2012, 05-29 Study SessionAGENDA
SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
STUDY SESSION FORMAT
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
6:00 p.m.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11707 East Sprague Avenue, First Floor
(Please Silence Your Cell Phones During the Meeting)
DISCUSSION LEADER SUBJECT /ACTIVITY GOAL
ROLL CALL
ACTION ITEMS:
1. Mayor Towey
NON - ACTION ITEMS:
2. Steve Worley
3. Kelly Konkright
4. Kelly Konkright
5. Kelly Konkright
6. Deputy Mayor Schimmels,
Mike Jackson
7. Mayor Towey
Economic Development Committee Motion Consideration
Mayoral Appointments of Students to Committee
[public comment]
Draft 2013 -2018 Six Year Transportation
Improvement Plan (TIP)
Truck Traffic /Parking
Proposed Franchise for Coeur d'Alene
Indian Tribe Use of Right -of -way
Lodging Tax Sunset Provisions
Solid Waste Update
Advance Agenda
8. Information Only (will not be discussed or reported): Finance Monthly Report
9. Mayor Towey
10. Mike Jackson
ADJOURN
Council Check -in
City Manager Comments
Discussion /Information
Discussion /Information
Discussion /Information
Discussion /Information
Discussion /Information
Discussion /Information
Discussion /Information
Discussion /Information
Note: Unless otherwise noted above, there will be no public comments at Council Study Sessions. However, Council always
reserves the right to request information from the public and staff as appropriate. During meetings held by the City of Spokane
Valley Council, the Council reserves the right to take "action" on any item listed or subsequently added to the agenda. The term "action"
means to deliberate, discuss, review, consider, evaluate, or make a collective positive or negative decision.
NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical, hearing, or other
impairments, please contact the City Clerk at (509) 921 -1000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made.
Study Session Agenda, May 29, 2012 Page 1 of 1
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 29, 2012
Department Director Approval: ❑
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Mayoral Appointment: Economic Development Committee, appointment
of Students to Committee
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
After initial discussion late March, this subject returned as a Council agenda item at the April 17
council meeting, at which time Council determined to change the makeup of the committee to
two councilmembers, three members from a business, three from tourism, and two citizens at
large. It was also determined at that meeting that Councilmember Hafner would speak with the
various high school principals to see if there might be a student or a class or student club
interested in participating on this committee, and depending on that outcome, the membership
could be modified.
After meeting with several high school principals, the following students were recommended to
be added as members of this committee: Ben Baker from East Valley High School, and Josh
Ramsey from University High School.
BACKGROUND:
OPTIONS: Proceed with committee appointments, or take other action deemed appropriate.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move that Council confirm the Mayoral
Appointments of Ben Baker and Josh Ramsey to the Economic Development Ad Hoc
Committee.
BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT:
ATTACHMENTS:
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 29, 2012 Department Director Approval: ❑
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Draft 2013 — 2018 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
(TIP)
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010, Perpetual advanced six -year plans for
coordinated transportation program expenditures.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adopted 2012 -2017 Six Year TIP last year on June
28, 2011, Resolution #11 -005; Draft TIP Project List Admin. Report, April 17, 2012.
BACKGROUND: The City is required by RCW 35.77.010 to prepare and after public hearing
adopt a revised and extended comprehensive transportation program for the ensuing six
calendar years. This plan must be submitted to the Washington State Secretary of
Transportation before July 31St of each year.
The attached draft Six Year TIP incorporates comments received from the April 17th Council
Meeting and represents a significant revision to previously adopted TIPs. A new report is
included that groups projects by category, including a new `Street Preservation Projects'
category.
This draft TIP provides an increased emphasis on street preservation projects in accordance
with council goals. It also identifies from the recently adopted Pavement Management Program
(PMP) specific reconstruction and arterial preservation projects that could qualify for federal
funding. Projects not specifically identified, but included in the PMP, have been collectively
identified under the title "Pavement Preservation Program 20XX" for each year in this six -year
TIP.
Staff has reviewed historical funding levels for federal, state and City funds from the past five
years to estimate projected funding levels available during the next six years. The final adopted
Six -Year TIP is required to be fiscally constrained and reflect realistic expectations of annual
funding levels.
Other needed and worthwhile projects that do not fit within the limited amount of funding
anticipated from state and federal grants and City revenues are listed in the Unfunded Projects
List.
Based on council discussion, staff will continue to develop the TIP centered on Council priorities
and goals. This draft should be considered a `work in progress'. It may be updated again prior
to, and after receiving comments from, the Public Hearing scheduled for June 12, 2012.
OPTIONS: Discuss draft TIP project list and /or project schedules
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion.
BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: As the proposed 2013 -2018 Six Year TIP continues to
evolve, staff will coordinate with the Finance Department regarding the city's ability to meet local
match requirements for grants.
STAFF CONTACT: Steve Worley, Senior Engineer— Capital Projects
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Categorized List of Projects, 2) Draft 2013 -2018 TIP, 3) Unfunded
Projects List, 4) Annual List of Projects
2013 -2018 Six Year
Transportation
Improvement Program
(TIP)
Project SeleCtiOnfOr 2013 -2018 Six Year TIP
• Congestion Improvement
0 Only projects with current funding
• Improvement Projects
• Improve safety, pedestrian and bicycle mobility,
promote economic development, address geometric
deficiencies, reduce congestion, etc.
• Only projects with current funding
0 No new Improvement Projects
Example Corridorsfor Improvement Projects
8t" Ave. (Havana Rd. to
Park Rd.)
8t" Ave. (Dishman Mica Rd.
to Sullivan Rd.)
Adams Rd. (32ndAve - to
Mission Ave.)
Barker Rd.
City Limits)
(I -90 to South
Barker Rd. (Spokane River
to Trent Ave (SR290))
Bowdish Rd. (Sprague
Ave. to Dishman Mica Rd.)
Broadway Ave. (Flora Rd.
to Barker Rd.)
Flora Rd. (Sprague Ave. to
Mission Ave)
McDonald Rd. (Sprague
Ave. to SR -27)
Mission Ave (Argonne Rd.
to Pines Rd.)
Park Rd. (Sprague Ave. to
Trent Ave)
Sprague Ave (Tschirley Rd.
to East City Limits)
j� eyn
May 29, 2012
Project SeleCtiOnfOr 2013 -2018 Six Year TIP
• Reconstruction Projects
• Identified in PIVIP
• Added Concrete Intersections
• Concrete Corridors
➢Argonne Road (I -90 to Montgomery Rd.)
Sullivan Road (Spokane River to Trent Ave (SR290)
• Preservation Projects
• Arterials most eligible for federal grant funding
• Remaining projects grouped into annual PIVIP project
Example Preservation /Reconstruction Projects
• Grind /Overlay Project
• Euclid Ave.
• Concrete Intersection Project
Summary
• Review TIP List of Projects
j�alley
May 29, 2012
City of Spokane Valley
Grant Funding Summary
Street Projects, 2006 -2010
Project Name
Total Project
Cost
Outside Funding
Sources
% Outside
Funding
City Share
% City
Funding
Dish man-Mica/Montgomery Rehab
$
505,600
$
-
0%
$
505,600
100%
0003 Barker Road Bridge
$
11,817,000
$
10,340,000
88%
$
1,477,000
12%
0004 Barker - Boone to Spokane River
$
2,524,000
$
2,223,000
88%
$
301,000
12%
0005 Pines - Mansfield
$
6,397,100
$
5,405,600
85%
$
991,500
15%
0016 Appleway - Tshirley to Hodges
$
5,888,600
$
5,472,600
93%
$
416,000
7%
0016 Sprague /Conklin Signal
$
285,000
$
250,000
88%
$
35,000
12%
0019 Broadway Rehab - Pines to Sullivan
$
902,000
$
703,000
78%
$
199,000
22%
0022 Dish man-Mica PCC - 1st to Sprague
$
235,000
$
187,000
80%
$
48,000
20%
0053 24th Ave - Sullivan to Vera Crest
$
598,000
$
-
0%
$
598,000
100%
0054 44th Ave Pathway
$
334,000
$
334,000
100%
$
-
0%
0060 Argonne Resurfacing - 1 -90 to Trent
$
385,000
$
274,000
71%
$
111,000
29%
0062 Appleway /Sprague ITS
$
672,000
$
607,000
90%
$
65,000
10%
0063 Broadway Ave Safety Project
$
932,850
$
746,280
80%
$
186,570
20%
0065 Sprague /Sullivan PCC
$
1,164,400
$
745,100
64%
$
419,300
36%
0066 Broadway Rehab - Fancher to 1 -90
$
608,000
$
525,600
86%
$
82,400
14%
0067 Broadway /Fancher PCC
$
760,900
$
658,000
86%
$
102,900
14%
0068 Broadway Rehab - 1 -90 to Park
$
684,700
$
615,800
90%
$
68,900
10%
0071 Signal Controller Upgrades
$
258,400
$
223,500
86%
$
34,900
14%
0092 Sprague /Bowdish PCC
$
1,066,000
$
709,100
67%
$
356,900
33%
0098 Sprague ADA Upgrades
$
60,000
$
49,000
82%
$
11,000
18%
0099 1 -90 Ramp Resurfacing
$
300,000
$
-
0%
$
300,000
100%
0102 Sprague /Evergreen PCC
$
953,000
$
758,000
80%
$
195,000
20%
0103 Sprague /Pines PCC
$
946,000
$
752,000
79%
$
194,000
21%
0104 Sprague /McDonald PCC
$
909,000
$
723,000
80%
$
186,000
20%
0110 Sprague Rehab - Univ. to Evergreen
$
2,838,000
$
2,607,000
92%
$
231,000
8%
0127 Sprague 2009 ADA Upgrades
$
110,700
$
88,570
80%
$
22,130
20%
Funded Projects in Design Phase:
0060 Argonne ITS - Trent to 1 -90
$
1,289,200
$
1,111,000
86%
$
178,200
14%
0061 Pines ITS - Sprague to Trent
$
2,080,700
$
1,801,900
87%
$
278,800
13%
0069 Park Rd - Broadway to Trent
$
352,000
$
304,500
87%
$
47,500
13%
0088 Broadway - Moore to Flora
$
2,757,000
$
2,416,000
88%
$
341,000
12%
0112 Indiana Extension - Sullivan to Flora
$
2,612,000
$
2,297,000
88%
$
315,000
12%
0113 Indiana /Sullivan PCC
$
1,342,000
$
1,067,000
80%
$
275,000
20%
0114 Broadway /Sullivan PCC
$
1,230,000
$
978,000
80%
$
252,000
20%
STEP Re- paving Projects:
0057 Grandview Acres
$
1,094,000
$
975,700
89%
$
118,300
11%
0058 Trentwood
$
1,178,900
$
1,133,800
96%
$
45,100
4%
0081 White Birch
$
541,000
$
377,800
70%
$
163,200
30%
0082 Sutters
$
1,013,100
$
787,300
78%
$
225,800
22%
0084 Summerfield Phase 2
$
748,200
$
603,800
81%
$
144,400
19%
0091 Rockwell /Summerfield Phase 1
$
401,400
$
359,900
90%
$
41,500
10%
0094 Rockwell Phase 2
$
799,300
$
694,000
87%
$
105,300
13%
0106 West Ponderosa Phase 1
$
1,750,100
$
1,077,300
62%
$
672,800
38%
0106 West Ponderosa Phase 2
$
1,802,600
$
1,550,800
86%
$
251,800
14%
0107 Valleyview
$
1,600,100
$
1,152,200
72%
$
447,900
28%
0108 Rotchford Acres
$
1,129,600
$
753,800
67%
$
375,800
33%
0109 Clement
$
1,263,800
$
925,600
73%
$
338,200
27%
Total Costs
$
67,120,000
$
55,365,000
82%
$11,756,000
18%
Leveraged City Match: $ 4.71 Received in Outside Funding for Every Dollar of City
Matching Funds
P: \Public Works \Capital Projects \Project Funding Applications \Sorted Project Grant Funding Summary.xls 4/27/2010
City of Spokane Valley
Department of Public Works
2013 — 2018 Six -Year
Transportation Improvement Program
Glossary & Abbreviations
Funding Sources:
Principal Arterial
• ARRA
American Recovery & Reinvestment Act
• BR
Bridge Replacement Program
• City
City Funds
• CDBG
Community Development Block Grant
• CMAQ
Congestion Management/Air Quality
• Developers
Private Developer Funds
• EECBG
Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant
• FHWA
Federal Highway Administration
• FMSIB
Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Program
• HUD
Housing & Urban Development
• REET
Real Estate Excise Tax
• Other Fed
Misc. Federal Funding Sources
• Other RR
Railroad Funding
• Other State
Misc. State Funding Sources
• SP
TIB Sidewalk Program
• SRTS
Safe Routes to School
• SW
City Stormwater Funds
• STA
Spokane Transit Authority
• STP(E)
Surface Transportation Program (Enhancement)
• STP(U)
Surface Transportation Program (Urban)
• TIB
Transportation Improvement Board
• UAP
TIB Urban Arterial Program
• UCP
TIB Urban Corridor Program
• WSDOT
Washington Department of Transportation
• WTSC
Washington Traffic Safety Commission
• WUTC
Washington Utilities & Transportation Commission
Fundina Status:
'0000�
*M&ne
40;000WW.
• S Project Funding is Secured
• P Project Funding is Planned. The Most
Probable Funding Sources have been
Identified.
Project Phases:
• PE Preliminary Engineering
• RW Right -of -Way
• CN Construction
• VE Value Engineering
Construction Tvae:
• PCC Portland Cement Concrete
• HMA Hot Mix Asphalt
• ITS Intelligent Transportation System
(Integrated Traffic Signal Control Systems)
• STEP Septic Tank Elimination Program
Street Functional Classifications:
• Urban:
• 14
Principal Arterial
• 16
Minor Arterial
• 17
Collector Arterial
• 19
Local Access
s,f. Draft 2013- 2018
Spokane Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program
ValleyDollars in Thousands
Funding
Project / Description / Current Status Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
1 Argonne Road - 190 to Trent 0.38 50 250 582 882 City 120
S CMAQ 762
Revise Signal Phasing, Add NB Right Turn Lane at Montgomery, Intersection Improvements at Knox
Funding Secured (SRTC 06 -31), City Project #0060
Project Total 882
2 Mission Ave. - Flora Rd. to Barker Rd. (PE /RW) 1 259 400 0 659 City 89
S STP(U) 570
120
762
882
89
570
Reconstruct to a 3 -lane section with curb, sidewalks, bike lanes and stormwater facilities;
PE & RW Funding Secured, (SRTC # ) City Project #0123,
Project Total
659
659
3 Sidewalk Infill Program 0 0
0 323 324 City
65
65
S
CMAQ
259
259
Fill in gaps in sidewalk system throughout city
Funded by CMAQ (SRTC # ), City Project #
Project Total
324
324
4 Sullivan Road West Bridge 0.08 1,068
140 16,880 18,088 BR
966
2,852
2,852
6,670
S
City
242
213
213
668
FMSIB
1,000
1,000
2,000
Reconstruct and widen west (southbound) bridge
Other
4,375
4,375
8,750
Fed
Recv'd FMSIB and BR grants
Project Total
1,208
89440
89440
189088
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
5/24/2012 Page 1
nT,.� Draft 2013- 2018
Spokane Six -Year Transportation Improvement
Program
ValleyDollars in Thousands
Funding
Project / Description / Current Status Length PE RW CN Total
Sources
2013 2014 2015
2016 2017 2018 Total
5 24th Ave Sidewalk - Adams to Sullivan 0.25 0 0 258 258
City
132
132
S
Other
126
126
State
Fill in gaps in sidewalk
Funded, TIB Grant
Project Total
258
258
6 Mansfield Ave Connection - Pines (SR -27) to 0.21 50 540 951 1,541
City
61
61
S 200 -ft East of Houk Rd
CMAQ
511
511
UCP
792
792
Construct 3 -lane arterial gap connection from Pines to Houk, w/ sidewalk, curb, and stormwater facilities
Develop
177
177
ers
PE /RW funded by CMAQ (SRTC #10 -12), CN Funded by TIB( #9 -E- 208(003) -1), City Project #0156
Project Total
1,541
19541
7 Sidewalk & Transit Stop Accessibility Project 0 7 3 102 111
City
22
22
S
Other-
89
89
FTA
Sidewalk and bus stop improvements
Project Total
111
111
8 Spokane Valley- Millwood Trail - SCC to 5 559 0 0 559
City
S Evergreen Rd (PE)
STP(E)
559
559
Construct Shared Use Pathway on abandoned Railroad Right -of -way
PE Funded
Project Total
559
559
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
5/24/2012 Page 2
�,,, �,f Draft 2013- 2018
Spokane Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program
ValleyDollars in Thousands
Funding
Project / Description / Current Status Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2013 2014 2015
2016 2017 2018 Total
9 Sullivan Rd /UPRR Overpass Bridge Resurfacing 0.05
52 0 410 461
City
92
92
P Project
BR
369
369
Resurfacing of RR Overpass Bridge Deck
Project Total
461
461
10 University Rd /1 -90 Overpass Study 0
188 0 0 188
City
26
26
S
CMAQ
162
162
Study of feasibility and benefits of overpass at University /1 -90 to Argonne /SR -27
Project Total
188
188
11 Wellesley / Adams Sidewalk Project 0.85 32 38 500 570 Other 568 568
State
S City 2 2
Construct 6 -ft sidewalk on one side of Adams (Trent to Wellesley) and north side of Wellesley (Sullivan to 200 -ft East of
Isenhart)
Funded by SRTS
Project Total 570 570
12 Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Havana to Fancher 1
P (EB Lanes)
Grind /Overlay EB lanes; OCI : 38.53
50 0 450 500 City 500
Project Total 500
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
5/24/2012 Page 3
500
500
nT,.� Draft
2013-
2018
Spokane Six -Year Transportation Improvement
Program
..AiloiliiilOValley Dollars
in Thousands
Funding
Project / Description / Current Status Length PE
RW
CN Total
Sources
2013
2014 2015
2016 2017 2018 Total
13 Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Fancher to Dollar 0.4 24
0
225 249
City
249
249
P
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 35.83
Project Total
249
249
14 Park Road - #2 - Broadway to Indiana (RW & CN) 0.75 0
150
2,877 3,027
City
20
388
408
P
STP(U)
130
2,489
2,619
Reconstruct to a 3 -lane section with curb, sidewalks, bike lanes and stormwater facilities
Project Total
150
2,877
3,027
15 Sullivan / Euclid Concrete Intersection (RW /CN) 0 0
0
1,562 1,562
City
211
211
P
STP(U)
1,351
1,351
Reconstruct intersection in concrete pavement
Project Total
1,562
19562
16 Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study - 1 -90 to 2 200
0
0 200
City
27
27
P Wellesley
STP(U)
173
173
Conceptual Planning for Sullivan Road corridor improvements
Project Total 200 200
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
5/24/2012 Page 4
Spoka0W^%0W1_
ne
Valley
Project / Description / Current Status
Draft 2013- 2018
Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program
Dollars in Thousands
Funding
Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
17 Park Road #1 Sidewalk Project - Sinto Ave. to 0.44 49 25 360 434 City
p Indiana Ave. Other
State
Construct sidewalk along east side of Park Road from 200 -ft S. of Sinto to Indiana Ave. and 165 -ft gap on Mission Ave.
east of Park Rd
SRTS Application Submitted 2012
2 19 21
47 366 413
Project Total 49 385
18 Park Road #2 Sidewalk Project - Marietta Ave. 0.11 14 25 104 143 City 1 6
p to Buckeye Ave. Other 22 114
State
Construct sidewalk along one side of Park Road and 160 -ft gap on north side of Buckeye Ave east of Park Road
SRTS Application submitted 2012
434
7
136
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
5/24/2012 Page 5
Project Total 23
120
143
19 Broadway @ Argonne /Mullan Concrete 0
0 0 2,110 2,110 City
285
285
p Intersections (CN Only)
STP(U)
1,825
1,825
Reconstruct intersections in concrete pavement
Project Total
2,110
2,110
20 Greenacres Trail - Sullivan to E City Limits 2.2
0 0 1,095 1,095 STP(E)
1,095
1,095
p (RW &CN)
Construct Shared Use Pathway on abandoned railroad right -of -way
Project Total
1,095
1,095
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
5/24/2012 Page 5
nT,.�
Draft
2013-
2018
Spokane Six -Year
Transportation Improvement
Program
ValleyDollars
in Thousands
Funding
Project / Description / Current Status
Length PE
RW
CN Total
Sources 2013
2014
2015 2016 2017
2018 Total
21 Spokane Valley- Millwood Trail - SCC to
6.5 0
100
4,280 4,380
City
P Evergreen Rd (RW &CN)
STP(E)
100
2,140 2,140
4,380
Construct Shared Use Pathway on abandoned Railroad Right -of -way
Project Total
100
2,140 2,140
4,380
22 Sullivan Road Concrete Pavement Phase 1 -
0.24 277
0
2,121 2,398
City
28
295
323
P Spokane River to Inland Asphalt Entrance
STP(U)
180
1,895
2,075
Reconstruct urban arterial in concrete pavement; OCI: 37.28 (2013)
Project Total
208
2,190
2,398
23 Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Herald to University
0.4 30
0
375 405
City
405
405
P
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 35.01
Project Total
405
405
24 Mission Ave. - Flora Rd. to Barker Rd. (CN)
0 0
0
4,050 4,050
City
810
810
P
UAP
3,240
3,240
Reconstruct to a 3 -lane section with curb, sidewalks, bike lanes and stormwater facilities
Project Total
4,050
4,050
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
5/24/2012 Page 6
nT,.�
Draft
2013-
2018
Spokane Six -Year Transportation Improvement
Program
ValleyDollars
in Thousands
Funding
Project / Description / Current Status
Length
PE RW
CN Total
Sources 2013
2014 2015
2016 2017 2018 Total
25 Argonne Road Resurfacing - Sprague to
0.5
30 0
265 295
City
295
295
P Broadway
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 35.63
Project Total
295
295
26 Mullan Road Resurfacing - Dishman Mica to
0.6
30 0
265 295
City
295
295
P Broadway
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 35.56
Project Total
295
295
27 Evergreen Road Resurfacing - Sprague to
0.9
40 0
950 990
City
990
990
P Mission
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 35.07
Project Total
990
990
28 Euclid Ave Reconstruction - Flora to E City
1.5
80 0
1,500 1,580
City
1,580
1,580
P Limits
Full Road Reconstruction; OCI: 27.3
Project Total
1,580
1,580
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
5/24/2012 Page 7
nT,.�
Draft
2013-
2018
Spokane Six -Year Transportation Improvement
Program
ValleyDollars
in Thousands
Funding
Project / Description / Current Status
Length
PE RW
CN Total
Sources 2013 2014
2015
2016 2017 2018 Total
29 Mission Ave Resurfacing - Argonne to Herald
0.6
30 0
440 470
City
470
470
P
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 33.68
Project Total
470
470
30 Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Thierman to Park
0.5
30 0
615 645
City
87
87
P
STP(U)
558
558
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 34.3
Project Total
645
645
31 Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Argonne to Herald
0.6
30 0
680 710
City
96
96
P
STP(U)
614
614
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 33.28
Project Total
710
710
32 Dishman Mica Resurfacing - Sands to Thorpe
0.6
25 0
328 353
City
353
353
P
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 34.43
Project Total
353
353
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
5/24/2012 Page 8
nT,.� Draft
2013-
2018
Spokane Six -Year Transportation Improvement
Program
ValleyDollars
in Thousands
Funding
Project / Description / Current Status Length
PE RW
CN Total
Sources 2013 2014
2015
2016 2017 2018 Total
33 Mullan Road Resurfacing - Broadway to Mission 0.5
25 0
286 311
City
311
311
P
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 33.38
Project Total
311
311
34 Sullivan Road Resurfacing - Broadway to 0.5
30 0
250 280
City
38
38
p Mission
STP(U)
242
242
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 32.49
Project Total
280
280
35 Euclid Ave Reconstruction - W end to Sullivan 0.3
25 0
515 540
City
540
540
P
STP(U)
Full Road Reconstruction; OCI: 21.42
Project Total
540
540
36 Madison Road Reconstruction - 40th to Thorpe 0.5
30 0
1,450 1,480
City
1,480
1,480
P
Full Road Reconstruct; OCI: 22.06
Project Total
1,480
1,480
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
5/24/2012 Page 9
nT,.� Draft 2013- 2018
Spokane Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program
ValleyDollars in Thousands
Funding
Project / Description / Current Status Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
37 Flora Road Reconstruction - Euclid to Trent 1 25 0 1,300 1,325 City 1,325 1,325
P
Full Road Reconstruction: OCI: 27.96
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
5/24/2012 Page 10
Project Total
1,325
1,325
38 Appleway Trail - University to Tshirley 4
300 0 3,000 3,300 City
P
STP(E)
150 150
1,500 1,500 3,300
Construct Shared Use Pathway along abandoned Railroad Right -of -Way
Project Total
150 150
1,500 1,500 3,300
39 Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Vista to Argonne 0.5
25 0 640 665 City
89
89
P
STP(U)
576
576
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 34.04
Project Total
665
665
40 Appleway Blvd Resurfacing - Vista to Dishman 0.5
25 0 1,100 1,125 City
1,125
1,125
P Mica
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 33.37
Project Total
1,125
1,125
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
5/24/2012 Page 10
nT,.� Draft
2013-
2018
Spokane Six -Year Transportation Improvement
Program
ValleyDollars
in Thousands
Funding
Project / Description / Current Status Length
PE RW
CN Total
Sources 2013 2014
2015 2016 2017
2018 Total
41 Dishman Mica Road Resurfacing - 40th to Sands 0.25
20 0
260 280
City
280
280
P
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 33.67
Project Total
280
280
42 Dishman Mica Road Resurfacing - Thorpe to S 0.3
20 0
190 210
City
210
210
P City Limit
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 32.58
Project Total
210
210
43 Sullivan Road Resurfacing - Sprague to 0.5
25 0
800 825
City
111
111
P Broadway
STP(U)
714
714
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 31.2
Project Total
825
825
44 Euclid Ave Reconstruction - Sullivan to Marietta 0.5
25 0
1,960 1,985
City
268
268
P
STP(U)
1,717
1,717
Full Road Reconstruction; OCI: 28.41
Project Total
1,985
1,985
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
5/24/2012 Page 11
Spokane
Valley
Project / Description / Current Status
Draft 2013- 2018
Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program
Dollars in Thousands
Funding
Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
45 Progress Road Reconstruction - Wellesley to 0.25 20 0 450 470 City
p Crown
Full Road Reconstruct: OCI: 17.15
470
470
48 Barker Road / BNSF Grade Separation (PE & 0 2,250 400
Project Total
470
470
46 Farr Road Reconstruction - 4th to 8th
0.25 20 0 500 520 City
520
620
P
Fed
Full Road Reconstruction; OCI: 28.93
Other
611 1,368
1,979
Project Total
520
520
47 Argonne Road Concrete Pavement- 1 -90 to
0 362 0 2,776 3,138 City
362 2,776
3,138
p Montgomery
RR
Reconstruct pavement in concrete; OCI: 40.35 (2012)
Project Total
362 2,776
3,138
48 Barker Road / BNSF Grade Separation (PE & 0 2,250 400
0 2,649 City
101 256
357
p RW Only)
Other
180
180
Fed
Other
611 1,368
1,979
Fed
Construct Grade Separation at Barker /BNSF RR/ Trent (SR290)
Other-
38 95
133
RR
FY09 Federal Earmark for $720K million, $10M received from FMSIB for CN phase
Project Total
750 1,899
2,649
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
5/24/2012 Page 12
nT,.�
Draft
2013-
2018
Spokane Six -Year Transportation Improvement
Program
ValleyDollars
in Thousands
Funding
Project / Description / Current Status
Length
PE RW
CN Total
Sources 2013 2014 2015
2016 2017
2018
Total
49 Sullivan Road Concrete Pavement Phase 2 -
0.32
338 0
2,595 2,933
STP(U)
219
2,318
2,537
P Inland Asphalt Entrance to Marietta
City
34
362
396
Concrete Pavement; OCI: 37.28 (2013)
Project Total
253
2,680
2,933
50 Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Park to Vista
0.5
25 0
565 590
City
79
79
P
STP(U)
511
511
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 31.58
Project Total
590
590
51 Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Sullivan to Conklin
0.5
25 0
660 685
City
92
92
P
STP(U)
593
593
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 31.46
Project Total
685
685
52 Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Flora to Corbin
0.25
20 0
410 430
City
58
58
P
STP(U)
372
372
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 32.76
Project Total
430
430
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
5/24/2012 Page 13
nT,.�
Draft
2013-
2018
Spokane Six -Year Transportation Improvement
Program
ValleyDollars
in Thousands
Funding
Project / Description / Current Status
Length
PE RW
CN Total
Sources 2013 2014 2015
2016 2017
2018 Total
53 Evergreen Road Resurfacing - 1 -90 to Indiana
0.25
20 0
260 280
City
280
280
P
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 30.43
Project Total
280
280
54 Euclid Ave Reconstruction - Marietta to Flora
0.5
20 0
1,335 1,355
City
1,355
1,355
P
Full Road Reconstruction; OCI: 29.21
Project Total
1,355
1,355
55 Farr Road Reconstruction - Appleway to 4th
0.25
20 0
230 250
City
250
260
P
Full Road Reconstruction; OCI: 29.63
Project Total
250
250
56 Sprague / Fancher Concrete Intersection
0
181 0
1,391 1,572
City
212
212
P
STP(U)
1,360
1,360
Reconstruct Intersection in concrete pavement
Project Total
1,572
1,572
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
5/24/2012 Page 14
nT,.� Draft 2013- 2018
Spokane Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program
ValleyDollars in Thousands
Funding
Project / Description / Current Status Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
57 Sprague / Argonne - Mullan Concrete
P Intersections
Reconstruct intersections in concrete pavement
0 270 0 2,072 2,342 City
Project Total
Totals: 7,350 2,070 69,653 79,073
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
5/24/2012 Page 15
2,342 2,342
2,342 2,342
9,494 22,950 19,034 8,732 10,441 8,421 79,072
Spokane
,,;o0 Valley
Draft 2013- 2018
Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program
Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Totals
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
5/24/2012 Page 1
Secured
Projects
Federal
State
Other
Planned
Projects
$5,901
Year
Federal
State
Other
City
Total
Federal
State
Other
City
Total
2013
$3,878
$1,486
$177
$759
$6,300
$2,023
$69
$0
$1,102
$3,194
2014
$7,227
$1,000
$0
$213
$8,440
$5,689
$3,720
$0
$5,101
$14,510
2016
$7,227
$1,000
$0
$213
$8,440
$5,599
$0
$0
$4,995
$10,594
2016
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$5,297
$0
$0
$3,435
$8,732
2017
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$5,166
$0
$38
$5,237
$10,441
2018
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$5,366
$0
$95
$2,960
$8,421
Total
$18,332
$3,486
$177
$1,186
$23,180
$29,140
$3,789
$133
$22,830
$66,892
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
5/24/2012 Page 1
Totals
Federal
State
Other
City
Total
$5,901
$1,555
$177
$1,861
$9,494
$12,916
$4,720
$0
$5,314
$22,950
$12,826
$1,000
$0
$5,208
$19,034
$5,297
$0
$0
$3,435
$8,732
$5,166
$0
$38
$5,237
$10,441
$5,366
$0
$95
$2,960
$8,421
$47,472
$7,276
$310
$24,016
$799072
City of Spokane Valley
Department of Public Works
Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program
Projects w/ No Currently Identified Local Match Within Existing Resources
Dollars in Thousands
Project Name Description Total Cost
Arterial Improvement Projects
Bowdish Road - 16th to Sprague
Sprague to 8th: Inlay & Enhancement; 8th to 16th:
$2,851
Reconstruct as 2 -lane section w/ curb, sidewalk, bike lanes
and new stormwater facilities;
Bowdish Road - 24th to 16th
Reconstruct Roadway as 2 -lane section w/ curb, sidewalk and
$2,846
new stormwater facilities;
Bowdish Road - 32nd to 24th
Reconstruct Roadway as 2 -lane section w/ curb, sidewalk and
$2,637
new stormwater facilities;
Sullivan Road North Extension
Reconstruct and widen the Sullivan Road extension north also
$55
(Bigelow Gulch)
known as Bigelow Gulch Road to a 4 -lane roadway with 8 -foot
shoulders and a 12 -foot two way left turn lane.
Wellesley Realignment @
Realign connection of Wellesley to Barker Rd and SR290, 3-
$5,187
Barker /SR290
lane section, Part of Barker /BNSF Grade Separation
Bridge Projects
Barker Road / BNSF Grade
Construct Grade Separation at Barker /BNSF RR/ Trent
$32,000
Separation (CN Only)
(SR290)
Park Road / BNSF Grade Separation
Reconstruct Park Road to separate the grades of Park Road
$16,520
and the BNSF railroad tracks.
Congestion Improvement Projects
Evergreen ITS Improvements
Traffic Control Systems Upgrades for Eve rg reen (Broadway to
$708
16th)
Pines Corridor ITS: Sprague to 16th
Traffic Signal Control System for Corridor
$785
Saltese /Sullivan Traffic Signal
Improvements to Intersection, Install Traffic Signal (In
$586
coordination w/ Spokane County)
Sprague / Barker Traffic Signal
Install Traffic Signal
$594
Reconstruction Projects
Sprague / Thierman Concrete
Reconstruct intersection in concrete pavement
$1,242
Intersection
Sprague / University Concrete
Reconstruct Intersection in concrete pavement;
$1,660
Intersection
Sullivan / Kiernan Concrete
Reconstruct Intersection in concrete pavement;
$1,423
Intersection
5/24/2012 Page 1 of 2
City of Spokane Valley
Department of Public Works
Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program
Projects w/ No Currently Identified Local Match Within Existing Resources
Dollars in Thousands
Project Name Description Total Cost
Reconstruction Projects
Sullivan / Marietta Concrete
Reconstruct intersection in concrete pavement
$1,493
Intersection
Sullivan Road Concrete Pavement
Concrete Pavement; OCI: 37.28 (2013)
$2,722
Phase 3 - Marietta to Euclid
Sullivan Road Concrete Pavement
Concrete Pavement OCI: 37.45 (2013)
$3,360
Phase 4 - Euclid to Kiernan
Sullivan Road Concrete Pavement
Concrete Pavement; OCI 37.45 (2013)
$2,720
Phase 5 - Kiernan to Trent
Street Preservation Projects
Pavement Management Program -
Annual street preservation projects per PMP
$3,729
2013
Pavement Management Program -
Annual street preservation projects per PMP
$4,229
2014
Pavement Management Program -
Annual street preservation projects per PMP
$3,806
2015
Pavement Management Program -
Annual street preservation projects per PMP
$3,206
2016
Pavement Management Program -
Annual street preservation projects per PMP
$3,914
2017
Pavement Management Program -
Annual street preservation projects per PMP
$4,200
2018
Pavement Management Program -
Annual street preservation projects
$12,000
Local Access
Total $114,473
5/24/2012 Page 2 of 2
City of Spokane Valley
Department of Public Works
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
ProjectsListed by Category for the 2013 Six -Year TIP
Dollars in Thousands
Arterial Improvements
Project Name Description Start Year iotai Cost
Mission Ave. - Flora Rd. to Barker Reconstruct to a 3 -lane section with 2014 $4,050
Rd. (CN) curb, sidewalks, bike lanes and
stormwater facilities
Mission Ave. - Flora Rd. to Barker Reconstruct to a 3 -lane section with 2013 $918
Rd. (PE /RW) curb, sidewalks, bike lanes and
stormwater facilities;
Park Road - #2 - Broadway to Reconstruct to a 3 -lane section with 2013 $3,102
Indiana (RW & CN) curb, sidewalks, bike lanes and
stormwater facilities
Total: $8,070
Bridge Projects
Project Name
Description
Start Year
iotai Cost
Sullivan Road West Bridge
Reconstruct and widen west
2013
$19,750
University Rd /1 -90 Overpass Study
(southbound) bridge
2013
$250
Barker Road / BNSF Grade
Construct Grade Separation at
2017
$4,600
Separation (PE & RW Only)
Barker /BNSF RR/ Trent (SR290)
Sullivan Rd /UPRR Overpass Bridge
Resurfacing of RR Overpass Bridge
2013
$479
Resurfacing Project
Deck
Argonne Road - 190 to Trent
Revise Signal Phasing, Add NB
Total:
$24,829
Congestion Improvements
Project Name
Description
Start Year
iotai Cost
University Rd /1 -90 Overpass Study
Study of feasibility and benefits of
2013
$250
overpass at University /1 -90 to
Argonne /SR -27
Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study -
Conceptual Planning for Sullivan
2013
$200
1 -90 to Wellesley
Road corridor improvements
Argonne Road - 190 to Trent
Revise Signal Phasing, Add NB
2013
$1,291
Right Turn Lane at Montgomery,
Intersection Improvements at Knox
Mansfield Ave Connection - Pines
Construct 3 -lane arterial gap
2013
$1,977
(SR -27) to 200 -ft East of Houk Rd
connection from Pines to Houk, w/
sidewalk, curb, and stormwater
facilities
Total:
$3,718
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not
intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
Thursday, May 24, 2012 Page 1 of 5
City of Spokane Valley
Department of Public Works
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
ProjectsListed by Category for the 2013 Six -Year TIP
Dollars in Thousands
Pedestrian /Bicycle Program
Project Name Description Start Year Totai Cost
Sidewalk Infill Program Fill in gaps in sidewalk system 2013 $716
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not
intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
Thursday, May 24, 2012 Page 2 of 5
throughout city
Wellesley /Adams Sidewalk Project
Construct 6 -ft sidewalk on one side
2013
$639
of Adams (Trent to Wellesley) and
north side of Wellesley (Sullivan to
200 -ft East of Isenhart)
Spokane Valley- Millwood Trail - SCC
Construct Shared Use Pathway on
2013
$745
to Evergreen Rd (PE)
abandoned Railroad Right -of -way
Sidewalk & Transit Stop Accessibility
Sidewalk and bus stop improvements
2013
$315
Project
Greenacres Trail - Sullivan to E City
Construct Shared Use Pathway on
2014
$1,095
Limits (RW &CN)
abandoned railroad right -of -way
Park Road #1 Sidewalk Project -
Construct sidewalk along east side of
2013
$434
Sinto Ave. to Indiana Ave.
Park Road from 200 -ft S. of Sinto to
Indiana Ave. and 165 -ft gap on
Mission Ave. east of Park Rd
Park Road #2 Sidewalk Project -
Construct sidewalk along one side of
2013
$143
Marietta Ave. to Buckeye Ave.
Park Road and 160 -ft gap on north
side of Buckeye Ave east of Park
Road
24th Ave Sidewalk - Adams to
Fill in gaps in sidewalk
2013
$292
Sullivan
Appleway Trail - University to Tshirley
Construct Shared Use Pathway
2015
$3,300
along abandoned Railroad Right -of-
Way
Spokane Valley- Millwood Trail - SCC
Construct Shared Use Pathway on
2014
$4,380
to Evergreen Rd (RW &CN)
abandoned Railroad Right -of -way
Total:
$12,059
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not
intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
Thursday, May 24, 2012 Page 2 of 5
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not
intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
Thursday, May 24, 2012 Page 3 of 5
City of Spokane Valley
Department of Public Works
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
ProjectsListed by Category for the 2013 Six -Year TIP
Dollars in Thousands
Street Preservation Projects
Project Name
Description
Start Year
iotai Cost
Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Argonne
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 33.28
2015
$710
to Herald
Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Thierman
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 34.3
2015
$645
to Park
Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Herald to
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 35.01
2014
$405
University
Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Fancher
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 35.83
2013
$249
to Dollar
Argonne Road Resurfacing -
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 35.63
2014
$295
Sprague to Broadway
Mullan Road Resurfacing - Dishman
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 35.56
2014
$295
Mica to Broadway
Evergreen Road Resurfacing -
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 35.07
2014
$990
Sprague to Mission
Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Havana
Grind /Overlay EB lanes; OCI :38.53
2013
$500
to Fancher (EB Lanes)
Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Flora to
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 32.76
2017
$430
Corbin
Mission Ave Resurfacing - Argonne
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 33.68
2015
$470
to Herald
Evergreen Road Resurfacing - 1 -90
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 30.43
2017
$280
to Indiana
Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Sullivan
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 31.46
2017
$685
to Conklin
Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Park to
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 31.58
2017
$590
Vista
Sullivan Road Resurfacing - Sprague
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 31.2
2016
$825
to Broadway
Dishman Mica Road Resurfacing -
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 32.58
2016
$210
Thorpe to S City Limit
Appleway Blvd Resurfacing - Vista to
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 33.37
2016
$1,125
Dishman Mica
Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Vista to
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 34.04
2016
$665
Argonne
Sullivan Road Resurfacing -
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 32.49
2015
$280
Broadway to Mission
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not
intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
Thursday, May 24, 2012 Page 3 of 5
City of Spokane Valley
Department of Public Works
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
ProjectsListed by Category for the 2013 Six -Year TIP
Dollars in Thousands
Mullan Road Resurfacing - Broadway Grind /Overlay; OCI: 33.38 2015 $311
to Mission
Dishman Mica Resurfacing - Sands
to Thorpe
Dishman Mica Road Resurfacing -
40th to Sands
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 34.43 2015 $353
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 33.67 2016 $280
Total: $10,593
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not
intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
Thursday, May 24, 2012 Page 4 of 5
Total: $25,560
Overall Total: $84,829
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not
intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
Thursday, May 24, 2012 Page 5 of 5
City of Spokane Valley
Department of Public Works
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
ProjectsListed by Category for the 2013 Six -Year TIP
Dollars in Thousands
Street Reconstruction Projects
Project Name
Description
Start Year
Totai Cost
Euclid Ave Reconstruction - W end
Full Road Reconstruction; OCI: 21.42
2015
$540
to Sullivan
Sprague / Fancher Concrete
Reconstruct Intersection in concrete
2017
$1,572
Intersection
pavement
Argonne Road Concrete Pavement -
Reconstruct pavement in concrete;
2016
$3,138
1 -90 to Montgomery
OCI: 40.35 (2012)
Farr Road Reconstruction -
Full Road Reconstruction; OCI: 29.63
2017
$250
Appleway to 4th
Euclid Ave Reconstruction - Marietta
Full Road Reconstruction; OCI: 29.21
2017
$1,355
to Flora
Broadway @ Argonne /Mullan
Reconstruct intersections in concrete
2014
$2,110
Concrete Intersections (CN Only)
pavement
Farr Road Reconstruction - 4th to 8th
Full Road Reconstruction; OCI: 28.93
2016
$520
Progress Road Reconstruction -
Full Road Reconstruct; OCI: 17.15
2016
$470
Wellesley to Crown
Euclid Ave Reconstruction - Sullivan
Full Road Reconstruction; OCI: 28.41
2016
$1,985
to Marietta
Sullivan / Euclid Concrete
Reconstruct intersection in concrete
2013
$1,562
Intersection (RW /CN)
pavement
Madison Road Reconstruction - 40th
Full Road Reconstruct; OCI: 22.06
2015
$1,480
to Thorpe
Euclid Ave Reconstruction - Flora to
Full Road Reconstruction; OCI: 27.3
2014
$1,580
E City Limits
Sprague / Argonne- Mullan Concrete
Reconstruct intersections in concrete
2018
$2,342
Intersections
pavement
Sullivan Road Concrete Pavement
Reconstruct urban arterial in
2014
$2,398
Phase 1 - Spokane River to Inland
concrete pavement; OCI: 37.28
Asphalt Entrance
(2013)
Sullivan Road Concrete Pavement
Concrete Pavement; OCI: 37.28
2017
$2,933
Phase 2 - Inland Asphalt Entrance to
(2013)
Marietta
Flora Road Reconstruction - Euclid
Full Road Reconstruction; OCI: 27.96
2015
$1,325
to Trent
Total: $25,560
Overall Total: $84,829
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not
intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
Thursday, May 24, 2012 Page 5 of 5
City of Spokane Valley
Department of Public Works
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
2013 - 2018
Dollars in Thousands
2013
Item #
Project Name
Primary Source
City Amount
Total Amount
1
Argonne Road - 190 to Trent
CMAQ
120
882
2
Mission Ave. - Flora Rd. to Barker Rd. (PE /RW)
STP(U)
89
659
3
Sidewalk Infill Program
CMAQ
65
324
4
Sullivan Road West Bridge
BR
242
1,208
5
24th Ave Sidewalk - Adams to Sullivan
City
132
258
6
Mansfield Ave Connection - Pines (SR -27) to
UCP
61
1,541
200 -ft East of Houk Rd
7
Sidewalk & Transit Stop Accessibility Project
Other - FTA
22
111
8
Spokane Valley- Millwood Trail - SCC to
STP(E)
0
559
Evergreen Rd (PE)
9
Sullivan Rd /UPRR Overpass Bridge Resurfacing
BR
92
461
Project
10
University Rd /1 -90 Overpass Study
CMAQ
26
188
11
Wellesley / Adams Sidewalk Project
Other State
2
570
12
Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Havana to Fancher
City
500
500
(EB Lanes)
13
Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Fancher to Dollar
City
249
249
14
Park Road - #2 - Broadway to Indiana (RW &
STP(U)
20
150
CN)
15
Sullivan / Euclid Concrete Intersection (RW /CN)
STP(U)
211
1,562
16
Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study - 1 -90 to
STP(U)
27
200
Wellesley
17
Park Road #1 Sidewalk Project - Sinto Ave. to
Other State
2
49
Indiana Ave.
18
Park Road #2 Sidewalk Project - Marietta Ave. to
Other State
1
23
Buckeye Ave.
2013 Totals: $1,861 $9,494
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not
intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
Added Projects are shown in Green Rescheduled Projects shown in Orange Funded Projects are shown in Blue
Thursday, May 24, 2012 Page 1 of 3
2014
2014 Totals:
$5,314
$22,950
Item #
Project Name
Primary Source
City Amount
Total Amount
4
Sullivan Road West Bridge
Other Fed
213
8,440
14
Park Road - #2 - Broadway to Indiana (RW &
STP(U)
388
2,877
21
CN)
STP(E)
0
2,140
17
Park Road #1 Sidewalk Project - Sinto Ave. to
Other State
19
385
22
Indiana Ave.
STP(U)
295
2,190
18
Park Road #2 Sidewalk Project - Marietta Ave. to
Other State
6
120
29
Buckeye Ave.
City
470
470
19
Broadway @ Argonne /Mullan Concrete
STP(U)
285
2,110
31
Intersections (CN Only)
STP(U)
96
710
20
Greenacres Trail - Sullivan to E City Limits
STP(E)
0
1,095
33
(RW &CN)
City
311
311
21
Spokane Valley- Millwood Trail - SCC to
STP(E)
0
100
35
Evergreen Rd (RW &CN)
City
540
540
22
Sullivan Road Concrete Pavement Phase 1 -
STP(U)
28
208
37
Spokane River to Inland Asphalt Entrance
City
1,325
1,325
23
Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Herald to University
City
405
405
24
Mission Ave. - Flora Rd. to Barker Rd. (CN)
UAP
810
4,050
25
Argonne Road Resurfacing - Sprague to
City
295
295
Broadway
26
Mullan Road Resurfacing - Dishman Mica to
City
295
295
Broadway
27
Evergreen Road Resurfacing - Sprague to
City
990
990
Mission
28
Euclid Ave Reconstruction - Flora to E City Limits
City
1,580
1,580
2015 Totals: $5,208 $19,034
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not
intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
Added Projects are shown in Green Funded Projects are shown in Blue
Thursday, May 24, 2012 Page 2 of 3
2014 Totals:
$5,314
$22,950
2015
Item #
Project Name
Primary Source
City Amount
Total Amount
4
Sullivan Road West Bridge
Other Fed
213
8,440
21
Spokane Valley- Millwood Trail - SCC to
STP(E)
0
2,140
Evergreen Rd (RW &CN)
22
Sullivan Road Concrete Pavement Phase 1 -
STP(U)
295
2,190
Spokane River to Inland Asphalt Entrance
29
Mission Ave Resurfacing - Argonne to Herald
City
470
470
30
Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Thierman to Park
STP(U)
87
645
31
Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Argonne to Herald
STP(U)
96
710
32
Dishman Mica Resurfacing - Sands to Thorpe
City
353
353
33
Mullan Road Resurfacing - Broadway to Mission
City
311
311
34
Sullivan Road Resurfacing - Broadway to Mission
STP(U)
38
280
35
Euclid Ave Reconstruction - W end to Sullivan
City
540
540
36
Madison Road Reconstruction - 40th to Thorpe
City
1,480
1,480
37
Flora Road Reconstruction - Euclid to Trent
City
1,325
1,325
38
Appleway Trail - University to Tshirley
STP(E)
0
150
2015 Totals: $5,208 $19,034
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not
intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
Added Projects are shown in Green Funded Projects are shown in Blue
Thursday, May 24, 2012 Page 2 of 3
2016
2016 Totals:
$3,435
$8,732
Item #
Project Name
Primary Source
City Amount
Total Amount
21
Spokane Valley- Millwood Trail - SCC to
STP(E)
0
2,140
38
Evergreen Rd (RW &CN)
STP(E)
0
1,500
38
Appleway Trail - University to Tshirley
STP(E)
0
150
39
Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Vista to Argonne
STP(U)
89
665
40
Appleway Blvd Resurfacing - Vista to Dishman
City
1,125
1,125
Mica
41
Dishman Mica Road Resurfacing - 40th to Sands
City
280
280
42
Dishman Mica Road Resurfacing - Thorpe to S
City
210
210
50
City Limit
STP(U)
79
590
43
Sullivan Road Resurfacing - Sprague to
STP(U)
111
825
52
Broadway
STP(U)
58
430
44
Euclid Ave Reconstruction - Sullivan to Marietta
STP(U)
268
1,985
45
Progress Road Reconstruction - Wellesley to
City
470
470
55
Crown
City
250
250
46
Farr Road Reconstruction - 4th to 8th
City
520
520
47
Argonne Road Concrete Pavement - 1 -90 to
City
362
362
Montgomery
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not
intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
Added Projects are shown in Green Funded Projects are shown in Blue
Thursday, May 24, 2012 Page 3 of 3
2016 Totals:
$3,435
$8,732
2017
Item #
Project Name
Primary Source
City Amount
Total Amount
38
Appleway Trail - University to Tshirley
STP(E)
0
1,500
47
Argonne Road Concrete Pavement - 1 -90 to
City
2,776
2,776
Montgomery
48
Barker Road / BNSF Grade Separation (PE &
Other Fed
101
750
RW Only)
49
Sullivan Road Concrete Pavement Phase 2 -
STP(U)
34
253
Inland Asphalt Entrance to Marietta
2018 Totals:
$2,960
$8,421
50
Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Park to Vista
STP(U)
79
590
51
Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Sullivan to Conklin
STP(U)
92
685
52
Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Flora to Corbin
STP(U)
58
430
53
Evergreen Road Resurfacing - 1 -90 to Indiana
City
280
280
54
Euclid Ave Reconstruction - Marietta to Flora
City
1,355
1,355
55
Farr Road Reconstruction - Appleway to 4th
City
250
250
56
Sprague/ Fancher Concrete Intersection
STP(U)
212
1,572
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not
intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
Added Projects are shown in Green Funded Projects are shown in Blue
Thursday, May 24, 2012 Page 3 of 3
2017 Totals:
$5,237
$10,441
2018
Item #
Project Name
Primary Source
City Amount
Total Amount
38
Appleway Trail - University to Tshirley
STP(E)
0
1,500
48
Barker Road / BNSF Grade Separation (PE &
Other Fed
256
1,899
RW Only)
49
Sullivan Road Concrete Pavement Phase 2 -
STP(U)
362
2,680
Inland Asphalt Entrance to Marietta
57
Sprague/ Argonne - Mullan Concrete Intersections
City
2,342
2,342
2018 Totals:
$2,960
$8,421
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not
intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
Added Projects are shown in Green Funded Projects are shown in Blue
Thursday, May 24, 2012 Page 3 of 3
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 29, 2012 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Parking Regulations for Trucks in Residential Areas
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 9.05.010; WAC 308 - 330 -462; RCW 46.61.570
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None.
BACKGROUND
Council has received information from citizens, including public testimony at formal Council
meetings, that large commercial vehicles (such as semitrucks) are being parked in residential
areas of the City and that this is causing several difficulties for the residents in those areas. The
reported concerns include noise from continuous idling (particularly during the winter months
and in the early morning hours), obstruction of traffic, and aesthetics. At Council's request, staff
provides the following information regarding (1) the City's current ordinances and whether they
cover these concerns, and (2) what other municipalities have done to address the issues
presented by the parking of commercial vehicles in residential areas. Attached hereto are
photographs of semitrucks that have been parked in residential areas within the City.
The City's parking regulations are set forth in the Washington Model Traffic Ordinance (WMTO),
which the City adopted in SVMC 9.05.010. The WMTO parking restrictions do not prevent
persons from parking semitrucks and /or semitrailers on residential streets. Likewise, there are
no State laws preventing the parking of such vehicles in residential areas. The City does have
authority to adopt such parking regulations by ordinance. RCW 46.61.570(2); WAC 308 -330-
462; and SVMC 9.05.010.
While there is no specific prohibition against parking semitrucks on residential streets inside the
City, there are two limited circumstances in which law enforcement may be able to impound or
take custody of an unattended vehicle parked in a vehicular public right of way. The first is
when a vehicle is an accident or traffic hazard — such as when an unattended vehicle
constitutes an obstruction to traffic or jeopardizes public safety. RCW 46.55.113(a)(i);
46.55.010(14). The second mechanism allows law enforcement to take custody of any vehicle
parked along a public street 24 hours after it is tagged in accordance with the tagging
procedures of RCW 46.55.085.
These remedies only provide law enforcement with the ability to physically remove vehicles, and
only in limited circumstances which, depending on the individual circumstances, may or may not
apply to any particular situation in which a semitruck is parked in a residential area. To more
effectively regulate the parking in these situations, multiple jurisdictions have adopted
ordinances preventing the parking of semitrucks and other large vehicles in residential areas.
Examples of these ordinances are summarized below:
Page 1 of 4
Spokane
Prohibits the "habitual parking of any auto stage, farm vehicle, for -hire vehicle, limousine, motor
home, motor truck, private carrier bus, road tractor, semitrailer, trailer, park trailer, travel trailer,
tractor, truck, truck tractor, boat, or any other commercial vehicle" on any street in or bordering a
residential zone. Spokane Municipal Code 16A.61.562, a copy of which is attached to this RCA.
Liberty Lake
Prohibits parking of "commercial vehicles over 10,000 pounds licensed gross vehicle weight, the
principal use of which is the transportation of commodities, merchandise, produce, freight,
animals, vehicles, passengers for hire, or which are used primarily in construction or farming,
including but not limited to bulldozers, backhoes, tractors and cranes" between 12:01 a.m. and
6:00 a.m. on any street or highway in an area zoned residential.
Bellevue
Permits parking or storage of RVs, watercraft, and utility trailers in residential zones so long as
they are under 40 feet long and satisfy one of the following: 1) in a vented garage; 2) in a
carport sight- screened from abutting properties; 3) in a side or rear yard if sight- screened from
abutting properties and in compliance with setback requirements for accessory structures. The
ordinance provides an exception to the rule for a qualified disabled person with an RV and for
loading and unloading activities that are completed within three days. Defines RV as "[a]ny
wheeled, motorized vehicle manufactured, converted or altered to provide self- contained
temporary living quarters for recreational, camping or travel uses, and which does not exceed
40 feet in length. Any vehicle manufactured, converted, or altered which has integral wheels for
towing or can be mounted on a motorized vehicle to provide self- contained, temporary living
quarters for recreational, camping or travel uses."
Burlington
Prohibits recreational or commercial vehicles on the city streets or sidewalks in residential
zones, but allows them to be parked in a garage or private driveway. Permits two consecutive
days or two days in a seven -day period to load and unload (loading and unloading must be 15
minutes or under) on the street abutting the owner's property if it is done so in preparation for or
ending a departure. Defines RVs as "all travel trailers, tent trailers, boats, boat trailers, utility
trailers, snowmobile trailers or any similar vehicle. The term shall also include any "motor home"
or "camper" as such terms are defined in RCW 82.50.010." Defines commercial vehicles as
either: 1) vehicle or trailer over 20 feet long; or 2) vehicle over 10,000 pounds gross vehicle
weight and that are used commercially.
Clark County
Prohibits trailers and trucks with a gross weight capacity over 10,001 pounds, from being parked
on any street of any residential area of the county. Allows time for reasonable loading and
unloading, no set time limit.
Des Moines
Commercial vehicles over 10,000 pounds in gross weight and exceeding 20 feet in length and
7.5 feet in width are prohibited in residential areas except on a temporary basis not exceeding
six hours so long as sight is not obstructed. RVs and utility vehicles allowed in residential areas
only when: 1) they do not intrude into public rights -of -way or obstruct sight visibility from
adjacent driveways; 2) if at all possible, they cannot be parked in the front building setback; 3)
they must be clean and well -kept to not detract from appearance of surrounding area; 4) they
cannot be occupied as a dwelling unit. RVs and utility vehicles defined as travel trailers, folding
tent trailers, motor homes, truck campers, horse trailers, boat trailers, or utility trailers.
Page 2 of 4
Edmonds
Prohibits the parking or storing of commercial vehicles over 10,000 pounds in residential areas
unless a conditional use permit has been obtained. Allows for loading and unloading, no set
time limit. Commercial vehicle is defined as any motor vehicle, the principal use of which is the
transportation of commodities, merchandise, produce, freight, vehicles, animals, passengers for
hire, or which is used primarily in construction or farming, including but not limited to bulldozers,
backhoes, tractors and cranes.
Federal Way
A maximum of one commercial vehicle may be parked on a lot in a single - family residential
zoned lot regardless of weight. Provides exceptions for construction, loading and unloading (for
a maximum of 48 hours), and for limited time periods. If the commercial vehicle is over 80
inches wide there are time limitations on how long it may be parked on a lot. Parking or storage
of any recreational vehicle or boat more than nine feet in height and more than 22 feet in length
is prohibited in residentially zoned lots unless it falls into a listed exception. Commercial
vehicles, boats, and RVs may not be used for residential purposes for more than 14 -days in a
180 -day period.
Issaquah
RVs, commercial and utility vehicles and boats must be licensed, clean, well -kept. Commercial
vehicles may only be parked in residential areas if for temporary pick up, delivery, or moving
regardless of weight or size. "Commercial vehicles" are defined as a vehicle of size and weight
that is not typically found in a residential area. Travel trailers, campers, or motor homes may
only be parked in residential areas or kept in a side or rear yard. With the exception of
driveways, carports, and garages: trucks, RVs, and motorcycles shall not be permitted in front
or street side yards of a residential use property.
Lake Forest Park
Prohibits a truck or trailer or any type of construction equipment to be parked on any public
right -of -way in any residential zone unless in connection with a project, and only during daylight
hours. Does not apply to RVs, trailers, and pickup trucks.
North Bend
No parked trucks, truck tractors, or semitrailers, over 80 inches wide, permitted on streets in
multifamily residential zones, except for construction projects, and loading or unloading.
(Trucks in Multi- family Zones, Time Limits for Large Commercial Vehicles)
Redmond
Parking commercial vehicles over 10,000 pounds in residential areas is prohibited. Recreational
and utility vehicles must be located, in order of priority: 1) a vented garage or carport; 2) a side
or rear yard; 3) a front yard on a driveway; 4) other locations determined by the Code
Administrator to be less intrusive. Exemptions for pickup or light trucks 10,000 pounds gross
weight or less. The vehicles may be parked in residentially zoned areas provided the listed
conditions in the ordinance are met.
Renton
Prohibits parking of any vehicle over 12,000 pounds gross vehicle weight on any public right of
way in which all of the adjacent structures occupied as residential dwellings. "Adjacent
structures" means the same side of the right of way as the parking area and within the same
block. Prohibits commercial vehicles from parking at all during the hours of 12:00 a.m. and 3:00
a.m. on a public right of way. No person shall park a commercial vehicle upon a public right -of-
Page 3 of 4
way within 500 feet of a residential dwelling between 9:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. for more than ten
consecutive minutes within any two hour period. Exceptions include deliveries from commercial
vehicles, privately owned recreational vehicles and boats, utility trucks owned by a public or
quasi - public agency responding to emergencies. Violation is a nuisance and vehicle is
impounded.
Tacoma
Prohibits parking a commercial vehicle over 12,000 pounds on residential property or any public
street in a residential district for a period in excess of one hour unless engaged in loading and
unloading. Unlawful to park more than two vehicles of 12,000 pounds or less which are used for
commercial purposes. Prohibits parking a trailer, boat trailer, or RV on a public street for a
period of longer than seven -days. RVs may be used for human habitation for up to 14 -days per
calendar year so long as a proper permit has been attained.
If Council would like staff to develop an ordinance similar to the above, staff will seek Council
direction on the parameters of the ordinance, such as which vehicles to include in the
regulation, the scope of the prohibited conduct, and the penalty for violations.
OPTIONS: (A) No action, or (B) direct staff to draft an ordinance in accordance with
parameters identified by Council.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: It is within the discretion and authority of Council to
adopt an ordinance prohibiting the parking of commercial vehicles in residential areas.
BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None.
STAFF CONTACT: Kelly E. Konkright, Deputy City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS:
Spokane Municipal Code 16A.61.562
Photographs
Page 4 of 4
Spokane Municipal Code Page 1 of 1
Spokane Municipal Code Tuesday, April 17, 2012 - 9:58 AM
Print I Close Window Font Size: Increase I Decrease
Title 16A Motor Vehicles
Chapter 16A.61 Rules of the Road
Section 16A.61.562 Parking Non - passenger Vehicles in Residence Zones
No street right -of -way in an " R" zone of the City of Spokane, or which is the boundary of any "R" zone, shall be used for the habitual
parking of any auto stage, farm vehicle, for -hire vehicle, limousine, motor home, motor truck, private carrier bus, road tractor,
semitrailer, trailer, park trailer, travel trailer, tractor, truck, truck tractor, boat, or any other commercial vehicle. This section does not
prohibit on- street parking of a passenger vehicle, motorcycle, or motor - driven cycle.
Date Passed: Monday, November 10, 2008
ORD C34333 Section 5
http: / /www.spokanecity.org/ services /documents /smc /print/default.aspx 4/17/2012
1Oth Avenue & Ea &tffrn Road
m
. rr .•�_.
IMW
OF
-r• r r
- j' _ -
9�P0�k4�9� 99 0 QO
s
1 I Tli Avenue and Coleman Road
2.
r�
5
ti
r-
rip .
� i
r
p4094 99 �M
iis
R
i :A0 0
1
t. f
1
Ld
n
. r
r -
I� �
1
W I
� *
r ice■
Pa Iced in 1 fI on
4 of
Avenue
13624 EmA Mt)
i :A0 0
1
t. f
1
Ld
n
. r
r -
I� �
1
W I
� *
r ice■
L r "r ' i
*ilp
1. {
� rtr
,•
F I ti
`* a 4 _
4
r r-
-- 4F _
pr
• f _ r " - y
-n
F *JEParked M f torik o+f ' 3624 Erik h Avenue f f _ f e 7O T ■• J•� •�. • a
j
Al
L ■ r • ■ r
IF
■
; e, ' I&
11 pr
IA
w
p- - ,
_ ■ Tom•, • �
Aw-
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 29, 2012 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed Franchise for Coeur d'Alene Indian Tribe's Use of ROW
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35A.47.040
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None.
BACKGROUND: The Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Indians ( "CDA Tribe ") is seeking to install fiber
optic cable from its location in Worley, Idaho, to Liberty Lake, Washington, in order to upgrade
its capacity to provide access to the internet and telecommunication services. To accomplish
this, the CDA Tribe is seeking permission to run fiber cable along the City's rights -of -way. If the
franchise agreement is approved, the CDA Tribe plans to place fiber cable along Barker Road
from approximately 11th Avenue to 8th Avenue, and then along 8th Avenue from Barker Road to
Hodges Road.
This agreement with the CDA Tribe grants a non - exclusive franchise for telecommunication
facilities within the public rights -of -way of the City. The CDA Tribe does not currently have fiber
optic cables in the right -of -way. This agreement grants a franchise for a period of 10 years,
beginning on the effective date of the Ordinance, to install, construct, operate, maintain, replace
and use all necessary equipment and facilities to place telecommunications facilities in, under,
on, across, over, through, along or below the public rights -of -way and public places located in
the City, as approved under City permits issued pursuant to this franchise.
Similar to other franchises with private utility companies, the City collects no fee from this
agreement. The City has superior right to the use of the rights -of -way. The cost of any new
construction or maintenance of the CDA Tribe's facilities shall be solely the CDA Tribe's
expense. The City requires the CDA Tribe to maintain insurance through the entire period of
this agreement.
The City will need to publish a copy of a summary of the franchise in the newspaper prior to
adoption, at the CDA Tribe's cost. Staff recommends approval of the proposed franchise.
OPTIONS: The Council can approve the franchise, deny the franchise, or request changes.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consensus to place Ordinance 12 -0 ** authorizing
execution of a telecommunication facilities franchise with the CDA Tribe on a future agenda for
first reading.
BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None.
STAFF CONTACT: Kelly E. Konkright, Deputy City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposed franchise with the CDA Tribe.
2. Map showing location of where the CDA Tribe plans to place fiber
optic cable.
DRAFT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 12 - * **
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, GRANTING A NON - EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE TO THE COEUR
WALENE TRIBE OF INDIANS TO CONSTRUCT, MAINTAIN AND OPERATE
TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHTS -OF -WAY
OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING
THERETO.
WHEREAS, RCW 35A.47.040 authorizes the City to grant, permit, and regulate
"nonexclusive franchises for the use of public streets, bridges or other public ways, structures or
places above or below the surface of the ground for railroads and other routes and facilities for
public conveyances, for poles, conduits, tunnels, towers and structures, pipes and wires and
appurtenances thereof for transmission and distribution of electrical energy, signals and other
methods of communication, for gas, steam and liquid fuels, for water, sewer and other private
and publicly owned and operated facilities for public service;" and
WHEREAS, RCW 35A.47.040 further requires that "no ordinance or resolution granting
any franchise in a code city for any purpose shall be adopted or passed by the city's legislative
body on the day of its introduction nor for five days thereafter, nor at any other than a regular
meeting nor without first being submitted to the city attorney, nor without having been granted
by the approving vote of at least a majority of the entire legislative body, nor without being
published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation in the city before becoming
effective;" and
WHEREAS, this Ordinance has been submitted to the city attorney prior to its passage;
and
WHEREAS, the Council finds that the grant of the Franchise contained in this Ordinance,
subject to its terms and conditions, is in the best interests of the public, and protects the health,
safety, and welfare of the citizens of this City.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County,
Washington, ordains as follows:
Section 1. Definitions. For the purpose of this Ordinance, the following words and
terms shall have the meaning set forth below:
1. "City Manager" means the City Manager or designee.
2. "construction" or "construct" shall mean constructing, digging,
excavating, laying, testing, operating, extending, upgrading, renewing,
removing, replacing, or repairing a facility.
Ordinance 12- Teleconnnunications Franchise, Coeur d'Alene Indian Tribes Page 1 of 16
DRAFT
3. "day" shall mean a 24 -hour period beginning at 12:01 AM. If a
thing or act is to be done in less than seven days, intermediate Saturdays,
Sundays and legal holidays shall be excluded in the computation of time.
4. "franchise area" shall mean the entire geographic area within the
City as it is now constituted or may in the future be constituted.
5. "hazardous substances" shall have the same meaning as RCW
70.105D.020(10).
6. "maintenance, maintaining or maintain" shall mean the work
involved in the replacement and /or repair of facilities, including
constructing, relaying, repairing, replacing, examining, testing, inspecting,
removing, digging and excavating, and restoring operations incidental
thereto.
7. "permittee" shall mean a person or entity who has been granted a
permit by the Permitting Authority.
8. "permitting authority" shall mean the City Manager or designee
authorized to process and grant permits required to perform work in the
rights -of -way.
9. "product" shall refer to the item, thing or use provided by the
Grantee.
10. "public property" shall mean any real estate or any facility owned
by the City.
11. "Public Works Director" shall mean the Spokane Valley Public
Works Director or his/her designee.
12. "right -of -way" shall refer to the surface of and the space along,
above, and below any street, road, highway, freeway, lane, sidewalk, alley,
court, boulevard, parkway, drive, Grantee easement, and /or public way
now or hereafter held or administered by the City.
13. "streets" or "highways" shall mean the surface of, and the space
above and below, any public street, road, alley or highway, within the City
used or intended to be used by the general public, to the extent the City
has the right to allow the Grantee to use them.
14. "telecommunications facilities" shall mean any of the plant,
equipment, fixtures, appurtenances, antennas, and other facilities
necessary to furnish and deliver telecommunications services, including
Ordinance 12- Teleconnnunications Franchise, Coeur d'Alene Indian Tribes Page 2 of 16
DRAFT
but not limited to poles with crossarms, poles without crossarms, wires,
lines, conduits, cables, communication and signal lines and equipment,
braces, guys, anchors, vaults, and all attachments, appurtenances, and
appliances necessary or incidental to the distribution and use of
telecommunications services. The abandonment by Grantee of any
telecommunications facilities as defined herein shall not act to remove the
same from this definition.
Section 2. Grant of Franchise. The City of Spokane Valley, a Washington municipal
corporation (hereinafter the "City "), hereby grants unto the Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Indians
(hereinafter "Grantee "), a Franchise for a period of 10 years, beginning on the effective date of
this Ordinance, to install, construct, operate, maintain, replace and use all necessary equipment
and facilities to place telecommunications facilities in, under, on, across, over, through, along or
below the public rights -of -way and public places located in the City of Spokane Valley, as
approved under City permits issued pursuant to this franchise (hereinafter the "franchise "). This
franchise does not permit Grantee to use such facilities to provide cable services as defined by 47
C.F.R. § 76.5(ff).
Section 3. Fee. No right -of -way use fee is imposed for the term of this franchise.
Any such right -of -way use or franchise fee that may be imposed by subsequent ordinance would
apply to any subsequent franchise, if any, between the parties.
Section 4. Cijy Use. The following provisions shall apply regarding City use.
1. Grantee agrees to reserve to the City the right to access four dark fiber strands (2
pair) along the route identified in Exhibit A as adopted or amended, within the boundaries of the
City, for sole and exclusive municipal use or designation (the "City Reserved Fibers "). City
agrees that it shall not use the City Reserved Fibers as a public utility provider of
telecommunications business service to the public.
2. The City shall have the right to access by connection to the City Reserved Fibers
at existing Grantee splice points or reasonably established access points within the City limits.
The City shall provide at least 30 days written notice of intent to access the City Reserved Fibers.
Upon any access or use of the City Reserved Fibers, City shall pay Grantee a recurring monthly
charge of $20.00 per fiber pair per mile in use by the City (the "City Fiber Rate ") unless
otherwise specifically agreed by both the parties in writing and shall enter into Grantee's
standard "Fiber License Agreement" which shall govern the terms and conditions for use of the
City Reserved Fibers. Said recurring monthly charge shall not be imposed until such time as the
fiber is put into use by the City.
In the event the City Reserved Fibers are the last fibers remaining in Grantee's fiber
bundle, then the following shall apply:
A. If the City is using the fibers, then the rate the City shall pay Grantee will
change from the City Fiber Rate to Grantee's standard commercial rate.
Ordinance 12- Telecommunications Franchise, Coeur d'Alene Indian Tribes Page 3 of 16
DRAFT
B. If the City is not using the fibers, the City shall have the option of abandoning
the City Reserved Fibers in lieu of paying Grantee's standard commercial rate.
3. The City shall pay all costs associated with constructing any connection to the
City Reserved Fibers. The City Reserved Fibers shall have a term that matches the duration of
this Franchise Ordinance ( "Reserved Fiber Term ").
4. Consistent with RCW 35.99.070, at such time when Grantee is constructing,
relocating, or placing ducts or conduits in public rights -of -way, the Public Works Director may
require Grantee to provide the City with additional duct or conduit and related structures, at
incremental cost, necessary to access the conduit at mutually convenient locations. Any ducts or
conduits provided by Grantee under this section shall only be used for City municipal purposes.
A. The City shall not require that the additional duct or conduit space be
connected to the access structures and vaults of the Grantee.
B. This section shall not affect the provision of an institutional network by a cable
television provider under federal law.
C. Grantee shall notify the Public Works Director at least 14 days prior to opening
a trench at any location to allow the City to exercise its options as provided
herein.
Section 5. Recovery of Costs. Grantee shall reimburse the City for all costs of one
publication of this franchise in a local newspaper, and required legal notices prior to any public
hearing regarding this franchise, contemporaneous with its acceptance of this franchise. Grantee
shall be subject to all permit and inspection fees associated with activities undertaken through the
authority granted in this franchise or under City Code. Grantee shall be subject to all permit and
inspection fees associated with activities undertaken through the authority granted in this
franchise or under City Code.
Section 6. Non - Exclusivity. This franchise is granted upon the express condition that
it shall not in any manner prevent the City from granting other or further franchises or permits in
any rights -of -way. This and other franchises shall, in no way, prevent or prohibit the City from
using any of its rights -of -way or affect its jurisdiction over them or any part of them.
Section 7. Non - Interference with Existing Facilities. The City shall have prior and
superior right to the use of its rights -of -way and public properties for installation and
maintenance of its facilities and other governmental purposes. The City hereby retains full
power to make all changes, relocations, repairs, maintenance, establishments, improvements,
dedications or vacation of same as the City may deem fit, including the dedication,
establishment, maintenance, and improvement of all new rights -of -way, streets, avenues,
thoroughfares and other public properties of every type and description. Any and all such
removal or replacement shall be at the sole expense of the Grantee, unless RCW 35.99.060
provides otherwise. Should Grantee fail to remove, adjust or relocate its telecommunications
facilities by the date established by the Public Works Director's written notice to Grantee and in
Ordinance 12- Teleconnnunications Franchise, Coeur d'Alene Indian Tribes Page 4 of 16
DRAFT
accordance with RCW 35.99.060, the City may cause and /or effect such removal, adjustment or
relocation, and the expense thereof shall be paid by Grantee.
The owners of all utilities, public or private, installed in or on such public properties prior
to the installation of the telecommunications facilities of the Grantee, shall have preference as to
the positioning and location of such utilities so installed with respect to the Grantee. Such
preference shall continue in the event of the necessity of relocating or changing the grade of any
such public properties.
Grantee's telecommunications facilities shall be constructed and maintained in such
manner as not to interfere with any public use, or with any other pipes, wires, conduits or other
facilities that may have been laid in the rights -of -way by or under the City's authority. If the
work done under this franchise damages or interferes in any way with the public use or other
facilities, the Grantee shall wholly and at its own expense make such provisions necessary to
eliminate the interference or damage to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director.
Section 8. Construction Standards. All work authorized and required hereunder shall
comply with all generally applicable City Codes and regulations. Grantee shall also comply with all
applicable federal and state regulations, laws and practices. Grantee is responsible for the
supervision, condition, and quality of the work done, whether it is by itself or by contractors,
assigns or agencies. Application of said federal, state, and City Codes and regulations shall be
for the purposes of fulfilling the City's public trustee role in administering the primary use and
purpose of public properties, and not for relieving the Grantee of any duty, obligation, or
responsibility for the competent design, construction, maintenance, and operation of its
telecommunications facilities. Grantee is responsible for the supervision, condition, and quality
of the work done, whether it is by itself or by contractors, assigns or agencies.
If Grantee shall at any time be required, or plan, to excavate trenches in any area covered
by this franchise, the Grantee shall afford the City an opportunity to permit other franchisees and
utilities to share such excavated trenches, provided that: (1) such joint use shall not unreasonably
delay the work of the Grantee; and (2) such joint use shall not adversely affect Grantee's
telecommunications facilities or safety thereof. Joint users will be required to contribute to the
costs of excavation and filling on a pro -rata basis.
Section 9. Protection of Monuments. Grantee shall comply with applicable state
laws relating to protection of monuments.
Section 10. Tree Trimming. The Grantee shall have the authority to conduct pruning
and trimming for access to Grantee's telecommunications facilities in the rights -of -way subject to
compliance with the City Code. All such trimming shall be done at the Grantee's sole cost and
expense.
Section 11. Emergency Response. The Grantee shall, within 30 days of the execution
of this franchise, designate one or more responsible people and an emergency 24 -hour on -call
personnel and the procedures to be followed when responding to an emergency. After being
Ordinance 12- Telecoraraunications Franchise, Coeur d'Alene Indian Tribes Page 5 of 16
DRAFT
notified of an emergency, Grantee shall cooperate with the City to immediately respond with
action to aid in the protection of the health and safety of the public.
In the event Grantee refuses to promptly take the directed action or fails to fully comply
with such direction, or if emergency conditions exist which require immediate action to prevent
imminent injury or damages to persons or property, the City may take such actions as it believes
are necessary to protect persons or property and Grantee shall be responsible to reimburse the
City for its costs and any expenses.
Section 12. One -Call System. Pursuant to RCW 19.122, Grantee is responsible for
becoming familiar with, and understanding, the provisions of Washington's One -Call statutes.
Grantee shall comply with the terms and conditions set forth in the One -Call statutes.
Section 13. Safety. All of Grantee's telecommunications facilities in the rights -of -way
shall be constructed and maintained in a safe and operational condition. Grantee shall follow all
safety codes and other applicable regulations in the installation, operation, and maintenance of
the telecommunications facilities.
Section 14. Movement of Grantee's Telecommunications Facilities for Others.
Whenever any third party shall have obtained permission from the City to use any right—of-way
for the purpose of moving any building or other oversized structure, Grantee, upon 14 days'
written notice from the City, shall move, at the expense of the third party desiring to move the
building or structure, any of Grantee's telecommunications facilities that may obstruct the
movement thereof, provided, that the path for moving such building or structure is the path of
least interference to Grantee's telecommunications facilities, as determined by the City. Upon
good cause shown by Grantee, the City may require more than 14 days' notice to Grantee to
move its telecommunications facilities.
Section 15. Acquiring New Telecommunications Facilities. Upon Grantee's
acquisition of any new telecommunications facilities in the rights -of -way, or upon any addition
or annexation to the City of any area in which Grantee retains any such telecommunications
facilities in the rights -of -way, the Grantee shall submit to the City a written statement describing
all telecommunications facilities involved, whether authorized by franchise or any other form of
prior right, and specifying the location of all such facilities. Such facilities shall immediately be
subject to the terms of this franchise.
Section 16. Dangerous Conditions - Authority of City to Abate. Whenever
excavation, installation, construction, repair, maintenance, or relocation of telecommunications
facilities authorized by this franchise has caused or contributed to a condition that substantially
impairs the lateral support of the adjoining right -of -way, road, street or other public place, or
endangers the public, adjoining public or private property or street utilities, the City may direct
Grantee, at Grantee's sole expense, to take all necessary actions to protect the public and
property. The City may require that such action be completed within a prescribed time.
In the event that Grantee fails or refuses to promptly take the actions directed by the City,
or fails to fully comply with such directions, or if emergency conditions exist which require
Ordinance 12- Telecolmnunications Franchise, Coeur d'Alene Indian Tribes Page 6 of 16
DRAFT
immediate action, the City may enter upon the property and take such actions as are necessary to
protect the public, adjacent public or private property, or street utilities, or to maintain the lateral
support thereof, and all other actions deemed by the City to be necessary to preserve the public
safety and welfare; and Grantee shall be liable to the City for all costs and expenses thereof to
the extent caused by Grantee.
Section 17. Hazardous Substances. Grantee shall comply with all applicable federal,
state and local laws, statutes, regulations and orders concerning hazardous substances relating to
Grantee's telecommunications facilities in the rights —of -way. Grantee agrees to indemnify the
City against any claims, costs, and expenses, of any kind, whether direct or indirect, incurred by
the City arising out of the release or threat of release of hazardous substances caused by
Grantee's ownership or operation of its telecommunications facilities within the City's right -of-
way.
Section 18. Environmental. Grantee shall comply with all environmental protection
laws, rules, recommendations, and regulations of the United States and the State of Washington,
and their various subdivisions and agencies as they presently exist or may hereafter be enacted,
promulgated, or amended, and shall indemnify and hold the City harmless from any and all
damages arising, or which may arise, or be caused by, or result from the failure of Grantee fully
to comply with any such laws, rules, recommendations, or regulations, whether or not Grantee's
acts or activities were intentional or unintentional. Grantee shall further indemnify the City
against all losses, costs, and expenses (including legal expenses) which the City may incur as a
result of the requirement of any government or governmental subdivision or agency to clean
and /or remove any pollution caused or permitted by Grantee, whether said requirement is during
the term of the franchise or subsequent to its termination.
Section 19. Relocation of Telecommunications Facilities. Grantee agrees and
covenants, at its sole cost and expense, to protect, support, temporarily disconnect, relocate or
remove from any street any of its telecommunications facilities when so required by the City in
accordance with the provisions of RCW 35.99.060, provided that Grantee shall in all such cases
have the privilege to temporarily bypass, in the authorized portion of the same street upon
approval by the City, any section of its telecommunications facilities required to be temporarily
disconnected or removed.
If the City determines that the project necessitates the relocation of Grantee's then -
existing telecommunications facilities, the City shall:
a) At least 60 days prior to the commencement of such improvement project,
provide Grantee with written notice requiring such relocation; and
b) Provide Grantee with copies of pertinent portions of the plans and
specifications for such improvement project and a proposed location for Grantee's
telecommunications facilities so that Grantee may relocate its telecommunications
facilities in other City rights -of -way in order to accommodate such improvement
proj ect.
Ordinance 12- Telecolmnunications Franchise, Coeur d'Alene Indian Tribes Page 7 of 16
DRAFT
c) After receipt of such notice and such plans and specification, Grantee shall
complete relocation of its telecommunications facilities at no charge or expense to
the City so as to accommodate the improvement project in accordance with RCW
35.99.060 (2).
Grantee may, after receipt of written notice requesting a relocation of its
telecommunications facilities, submit to the City written alternatives to such relocation. The City
shall evaluate such alternatives and advise Grantee in writing if one or more of the alternatives
are suitable to accommodate the work which would otherwise necessitate relocation of the
telecommunications facilities. If so requested by the City, Grantee shall submit additional
information to assist the City in making such evaluation. The City shall give each alternative
proposed by Grantee full and fair consideration. In the event the City ultimately determines that
there is no other reasonable alternative, Grantee shall relocate its telecommunications facilities as
otherwise provided in this section.
The provisions of this section shall in no manner preclude or restrict Grantee from
making any arrangements it may deem appropriate when responding to a request for relocation
of its telecommunications facilities by any person or entity other than the City, where the
telecommunications facilities to be constructed by said person or entity are not or will not
become City owned, operated or maintained facilities, provided that such arrangements do not
unduly delay a City construction project.
If the City or a contractor for the City is delayed at any time in the progress of the work
by an act or neglect of Grantee or those acting for or on behalf of Grantee, then Grantee shall
indemnify, defend and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless
from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits including attorneys' fees to the extent
arising out of or in connection with such delays, except for delays and damages caused by the
City. This provision may not be waived by the parties except in writing.
Section 20. Abandonment of Grantee's Telecommunications Facilities. No
telecommunications facilities constructed or owned by Grantee may be abandoned without the
express written consent of the City.
Section 21. Maps and Records Required. Grantee shall provide the City, at no cost to
the City:
1. A route map that depicts the general location of Grantee's telecommunications facilities
placed in the rights -of -way. The route map shall identify telecommunications facilities as aerial or
underground and is not required to depict cable types, number of fibers or cables, electronic
equipment, or service lines to individual subscribers. Grantee shall also provide an electronic
format of the aerial /underground telecommunications facilities in relation to the right -of -way
centerline reference to allow the City to add this information to the City's Geographic Information
System ( "GIS ") program. The information in this subsection shall be delivered to the City by
December 1, annually.
Ordinance 12- Telecommunications Franchise, Coeur d'Alene Indian Tribes Page 8 of 16
DRAFT
2. In addition to subsection 1 of this section, the City may request Grantee to provide the
information described in subsection 1 of this section. To the extent such requests are limited to
specific telecommunications facilities at a given location within the franchise area in connection
with the construction of any City project, Grantee shall provide to the City, upon the City's
reasonable request, copies of available drawings in use by Grantee showing the location of such
telecommunications facilities. Grantee shall field locate its telecommunications facilities in
order to facilitate design and planning of City improvement projects.
3. Upon written request of the City, Grantee shall provide the City with the most recent
update available of any plan of potential improvements to its telecommunications facilities
within the franchise area; provided, however, any such plan so submitted shall be deemed
confidential and for informational purposes only, and shall not obligate Grantee to undertake any
specific improvements within the franchise area. The information in this subsection shall be
delivered to the City by December 1, annually.
4. In addition to the requirements of subsection 1 of this section, the parties agree to
periodically share GIS files upon written request, provided Grantee's GIS files are to be used
solely by the City for governmental purposes. Any files provided to Grantee shall be restricted
to information required for Grantee's engineering needs for construction or maintenance of
telecommunications facilities that are the subject of this franchise. Grantee is prohibited from
selling any GIS information obtained from City to any third parties.
5. Public Disclosure Act. Grantee acknowledges that information submitted to the City
may be subject to inspection and copying under the Washington Public Disclosure Act codified
in RCW 42.56. Grantee shall mark as "PROPRIETARY /CONFIDENTIAL" each page or
portion thereof of any documentation /information which it submits to the City and which it
believes is exempt from public inspection or copying. The City agrees to timely provide the
Grantee with a copy of any public disclosure request to inspect or copy
documentation/information which the Grantee has provided to the City and marked as
"PROPRIETARY /CONFIDENTIAL" prior to allowing any inspection and /or copying as well as
provide the Grantee with a time frame, consistent with RCW 42.56.520, to provide the City with
its written basis for non - disclosure of the requested documentation/information. In the event the
City disagrees with Grantee's basis for non - disclosure, the City agrees to withhold release of the
requested documentation /information in dispute for a reasonable amount of time to allow
Grantee an opportunity to file a legal action under RCW 42.56.540.
Section 22. Limitation on Future Work. In the event that the City constructs a new
street or reconstructs an existing street, Grantee shall not be permitted to excavate such street
except as set forth in the City's then- adopted regulations relating to street cuts and excavations.
Section 23. Reservation of Rights by City. The City reserves the right to refuse any
request for a permit to extend telecommunications facilities. Any such refusal shall be supported
by a written statement from the Public Works Director that extending the telecommunications
facilities, as proposed, would interfere with the public health, safety or welfare.
Section 24. Remedies to Enforce Compliance. In addition to any other remedy
Ordinance 12- Teleconununications Franchise, Coeur d'Alene Indian Tribes Page 9 of 16
DRAFT
provided herein, the City reserves the right to pursue any remedy to compel or force Grantee
and /or its successors and assigns to comply with the terms hereof, and the pursuit of any right or
remedy by the City shall not prevent the City from thereafter declaring a forfeiture or revocation
for breach of the conditions herein.
Section 25. City Ordinances and Regulations. Nothing herein shall be deemed to
direct or restrict the City's ability to adopt and enforce all necessary and appropriate ordinances
regulating the performance of the conditions of this franchise, including any reasonable
ordinances made in the exercise of its police powers in the interest of public safety and for the
welfare of the public. The City shall have the authority at all times to control by appropriate
regulations the location, elevation, and manner of construction and maintenance of any
telecommunications facilities by Grantee, and Grantee shall promptly conform with all such
regulations, unless compliance would cause Grantee to violate other requirements of law.
In the event of a conflict between the Municipal Code and this franchise, City Code shall
control.
Section 26. Vacation. The City may vacate any City road, right -of -way or other City
property which is subject to rights granted by this franchise in accordance with state and local
law. Any relocation of telecommunications facilities resulting from a street vacation shall
require a minimum of 180 days notice as provided for in section 37.
Section 27. Indemnification.
1. Grantee hereby covenants not to bring suit and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold
harmless the City, its officers, employees, agents and representatives from any and all claims,
costs, judgments, awards or liability to any person arising from injury, sickness or death of any
person or damage to property of any nature whatsoever relating to or arising out of this franchise
agreement; except for injuries and damages caused solely by the negligence of the City. This
includes but is not limited to injury:
a) For which the negligent acts or omissions of grantee, its agents, servants,
officers or employees in performing the activities authorized by a franchise are
the proximate cause;
b) By virtue of Grantee's exercise of the rights granted herein;
C) By virtue of the City permitting Grantee's use of the City's rights -of -ways
or other public property;
d) Based upon the City's inspection or lack of inspection of work performed
by Grantee, its agents and servants, officers or employees in connection with
work authorized on the facility or property over which the City has control,
pursuant to a franchise or pursuant to any other permit or approval issued in
connection with a franchise;
Ordinance 12- Telecolmnunications Franchise, Coeur d'Alene Indian Tribes Page 10 of 16
DRAFT
e) Arising as a result of the negligent acts or omissions of Grantee, its agents,
servants, officers or employees in barricading, instituting trench safety systems or
providing other adequate warnings of any excavation, construction or work upon
the facility, in any right -of -way, or other public place in performance of work or
services permitted under a franchise; or
f) Based upon radio frequency emissions or radiation emitted from Grantee's
equipment located upon the facility, regardless of whether Grantee's equipment
complies with applicable federal statutes and /or FCC regulations related thereto.
2. Grantee's indemnification obligations pursuant to subsection 1 of this section shall
include assuming liability for actions brought by Grantee's own employees and the employees of
Grantee's agents, representatives, contractors and subcontractors even though grantee might be
immune under RCW Title 51 from direct suit brought by such an employee. It is expressly
agreed and understood that this assumption of potential liability for actions brought by the
aforementioned employees is limited solely to claims against the City arising by virtue of
Grantee's exercise of the rights set forth in a franchise. The obligations of Grantee under this
subsection have been mutually negotiated by the parties, and Grantee acknowledges that the City
would not enter into a franchise without Grantee's waiver. To the extent required to provide this
indemnification and this indemnification only, Grantee waives its immunity under RCW Title
51.
3. Inspection or acceptance by the City of any work performed by Grantee at the time of
completion of construction shall not be grounds for avoidance of any of these covenants of
indemnification. Provided, that Grantee has been given prompt written notice by the City of any
such claim, said indemnification obligations shall extend to claims which are not reduced to a
suit and any claims which may be compromised prior to the culmination of any litigation or the
institution of any litigation. The City has the right to defend or participate in the defense of any
such claim, and has the right to approve any settlement or other compromise of any such claim.
4. In the event Grantee refuses the tender of defense in any suit or any claim, said tender
having been made pursuant to this section, and said refusal is subsequently determined by a court
having jurisdiction (or such other tribunal that the parties shall agree to decide the matter), to
have been a wrongful refusal on the part of Grantee, then Grantee shall pay all of the City's costs
for defense of the action, including all reasonable expert witness fees, reasonable attorneys' fees,
the reasonable costs of the City, and reasonable attorneys' fees of recovering under this
subsection.
5. Grantee's duty to defend, indemnify and hold the City harmless against liability for
damages caused by the concurrent negligence of (a) City or City's agents, employees, or
contractors, and (b) Grantee or Grantee's agents, employees, or contractors, shall apply only to
the extent of the negligence of Grantee or Grantee's agents, employees, or contractors. In the
event that a court of competent jurisdiction determines that a franchise is subject to the
provisions of RCW 4.24.115, the parties agree that the indemnity provisions hereunder shall be
deemed amended to conform to said statute and liability shall be allocated as provided herein.
Ordinance 12- Telecoininunications Franchise, Coeur d'Alene Indian Tribes Page 11 of 16
DRAFT
6. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this section, Grantee assumes the risk of damage
to its telecommunication facilities located in the rights -of -way and upon City -owned property
from activities conducted by the City, its officers, agents, employees and contractors, except to
the extent any such damage or destruction is caused by or arises from any willful or malicious
action or gross negligence on the part of the City, its officers, agents, employees or contractors.
Grantee releases and waives any and all such claims against the City, its officers, agents,
employees or contractors. Grantee further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend the
City against any claims for damages, including, but not limited to, business interruption damages
and lost profits, brought by or under users of Grantee's facilities as the result of any interruption
of service due to damage or destruction of Grantee's facilities caused by or arising out of
activities conducted by the City, its officers, agents, employees or contractors, except to the
extent any such damage or destruction is caused by or arises from the sole negligence or any
willful or malicious actions on the part of the City, its officers, agents, employees or contractors.
7. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration, revocation or termination of
this franchise.
Section 28. Insurance. Grantee shall procure and maintain for the duration of the
franchise, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may
arise from or in connection with the exercise of the rights, privileges and authority granted
hereunder to Grantee, its agents, representatives or employees.
Grantee's maintenance of insurance as required by this franchise shall not be construed to
limit the liability of Grantee to the coverage provided by such insurance, or otherwise limit the
City's recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity.
1. Automobile Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 Combined
Single Limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. This insurance
shall cover all owned, non - owned, hired or leased vehicles used in relation to this
franchise. Coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CA
00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary,
the policy shall be endorsed to provide contractual liability coverage; and
2. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written on Insurance Services
Office (ISO) occurrence form CG 00 01, or a substitute form providing equivalent
liability coverage acceptable to the City, and shall cover products liability. The
City shall be named as an insured under the Grantee's Commercial General
Liability insurance policy using ISO Additional Insured -State or Political
Subdivisions - Permits CG 20 12 or a substitute endorsement acceptable to the City
providing equivalent coverage. Coverage shall be written on an occurrence basis
with limits no less than $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit per occurrence and
$2,000,000 general aggregate for personal injury, bodily injury and property
damage. Coverage shall include but not be limited to: blanket contractual;
products /completed operations; broad form property; explosion, collapse and
underground (XCU); and Employer's Liability.
Ordinance 12- Telecommunications Franchise, Coeur d'Alene Indian Tribes Page 12 of 16
DRAFT
The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions
for Commercial General Liability insurance:
1. Grantee's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance with respect to the City
as outlined in the Indemnification section of this franchise. Any insurance, self -
insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be in excess of
Grantee's insurance and shall not contribute with it.
2. Grantee's insurance shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be
cancelled, except after thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to the
City.
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not less than
A: VII.
Grantee shall furnish the City with original certificates and a copy of any amendatory
endorsements, including the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance
requirements of Grantee prior to the adoption of this Ordinance.
Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies required herein shall
not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
Section 29. Performance Bond Relating to Construction Activity. Before undertaking
any of the work, installation, improvements, construction, repair, relocation or maintenance
authorized by this franchise, Grantee, or any parties Grantee contracts with to perform labor in
the performance of this franchise, shall, upon the request of the City, furnish a bond executed by
Grantee or Grantee's contractors and a corporate surety authorized to operate a surety business in
the State of Washington, in such sum as may be set and approved by the City, not to exceed
twenty -five thousand dollars, as sufficient to ensure performance of Grantee's obligations under
this franchise. The bond shall be conditioned so that Grantee shall observe all the covenants,
terms and conditions and shall faithfully perform all of the obligations of this franchise, and to
repair or replace any defective work or materials discovered in the City's road, streets, or
property. Said bond shall remain in effect for the life of this franchise. In the event Grantee
proposes to construct a project for which the above - mentioned bond would not ensure
performance of Grantee's obligations under this franchise, the City is entitled to require such
larger bond as may be appropriate under the circumstances.
Section 30. Modification. The City and Grantee hereby reserve the right to alter,
amend or modify the terms and conditions of this franchise upon written agreement of both
parties to such alteration, amendment or modification.
Section 31. Forfeiture and Revocation. If Grantee willfully violates or fails to comply
with any of the provisions of this franchise, or through willful or unreasonable negligence fails to
heed or comply with any notice given Grantee by the City under the provisions of this franchise,
and an adequate opportunity to cure the violation or non - compliance has been given in writing to
Grantee, then Grantee shall, at the election of the City, forfeit all rights conferred hereunder and
Ordinance 12- Teleconnnunications Franchise, Coeur d'Alene Indian Tribes Page 13 of 16
DRAFT
this franchise may be revoked or annulled by the City after a hearing held upon reasonable notice
to Grantee. The City may elect, in lieu of the above and without any prejudice to any of its other
legal rights and remedies, to obtain an order from the Spokane County Superior Court
compelling Grantee to comply with the provisions of this franchise and to recover damages and
costs incurred by the City by reason of Grantee's failure to comply.
Section 32. Assignment. This franchise may not be assigned or transferred without
the written approval of the City, except that Grantee can assign this franchise without approval
of, but upon notice to the City to, any parent, affiliate or subsidiary of Grantee or to any entity
that acquires all or substantially all the assets or equity of Grantee, by merger, sale, consolidation
or otherwise.
Section 33. Acceptance. Not later than 60 days after passage of this Ordinance, the
Grantee must accept the franchise herein by filing with the City Clerk an unconditional written
acceptance thereof. Failure of Grantee to so accept this franchise within said period of time shall
be deemed a rejection thereof by Grantee, and the rights and privileges herein granted shall, after
the expiration of the 60 -day period, absolutely cease, unless the time period is extended by
ordinance duly passed for that purpose.
Section 34. Survival. All of the provisions, conditions and requirements of sections:
5, 6, 7, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 27, 28, 29, 37, 38 and 39 of this franchise shall be in addition to
any and all other obligations and liabilities Grantee may have to the City at common law, by
statute, by ordinance, or by contract, and shall survive termination of this franchise, and any
renewals or extensions hereof. All of the provisions, conditions, regulations and requirements
contained in this franchise shall further be binding upon the heirs, successors, executors,
administrators, legal representatives and assigns of Grantee and City and all privileges, as well as
all obligations and liabilities of Grantee shall inure to their respective heirs, successors and
assigns equally as if they were specifically mentioned herein.
Section 35. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance
should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other
section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance. In the event that any of the provisions of
the franchise are held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the City reserves the
right to reconsider the grant of the franchise and may amend, repeal, add, replace or modify any
other provision of the franchise, or may terminate the franchise.
Section 36. Renewal. Application for extension or renewal of the term of this
franchise shall be made no later than 180 days of the expiration thereof. In the event the time
period granted by this franchise expires without being renewed by the City, the terms and
conditions hereof shall continue in effect until this franchise is either renewed or terminated by
the City.
Section 37. Notice. Any notice or information required or permitted to be given by or
to the parties under this franchise may be sent to the following addresses unless otherwise
specified, in writing:
Ordinance 12- Telecormnunications Franchise, Coeur d'Alene Indian Tribes Page 14 of 16
DRAFT
The City: City of Spokane Valley
Attn: City Clerk
11707 E. Sprague, Suite 106
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Grantee: Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Indians
Attn: IT Director
850 A Street
Plummer, ID 83851
Phone: (208) 659 -4578
Facsimile: (208) 686 -5059
Section 38. Choice of Law. Any litigation between the City and Grantee arising under
or regarding this franchise shall occur, if in the state courts, in the Spokane County Superior
Court, and if in the federal courts, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Washington.
Section 39. Non - Waiver, The City shall be vested with the power and authority to
reasonably regulate the exercise of the privileges permitted by this franchise in the public
interest. Grantee shall not be relieved of its obligations to comply with any of the provisions of
this franchise by reason of any failure of the City to enforce prompt compliance, nor does the
City waive or limit any of its rights under this franchise by reason of such failure or neglect.
Section 40. Entire Agreement. This franchise constitutes the entire understanding and
agreement between the parties as to the subject matter herein and no other agreements or
understandings, written or otherwise, shall be binding upon the parties upon execution and
acceptance hereof. This franchise shall also supersede and cancel any previous right or claim of
Grantee to occupy the City roads as herein described.
Section 41. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days
after publication of the Ordinance or a summary thereof occurs in the official newspaper of the
City of Spokane Valley as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council this day of , 2012.
Mayor, Thomas E. Towey
ATTEST:
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
Ordinance 12- Telecommunications Franchise, Coeur d'Alene Indian Tribes Page 15 of 16
DRAFT
Approved as to Form:
Office of the City Attorney
Date of Publication:
Effective Date:
Accepted by Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Indians:
The Grantee, Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Indians, for itself, and for its successors and
assigns, does accept all of the terms and conditions of the foregoing franchise.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, has signed this
day of , 2012. Subscribed and sworn before me this day of , 2012.
Notary Public in and for the State of
residing in
My commission expires
Ordinance 12- Telecoininunications Franchise, Coeur d'Alene Indian Tribes Page 16 of 16
us ml&, j
� pl
Le
rvii I
16"
Jpf
V,
464
n
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 29, 2012 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Effect of Lodging Tax Sunset Provision
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 67.28.080; .1815; and .1816
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None.
BACKGROUND:
Until 2007, lodging tax revenues could only be used "for the purpose of paying ... the cost of
tourism promotion, acquisition of tourism - related facilities, or operation of tourism - related
facilities." RCW 67.28.1815.
In 2007, the Legislature adopted RCW 67.28.1816. RCW 67.28.1816 provides the only
exception to the above. Under RCW 67.28.1816, lodging tax revenues may also be used "for
the marketing and operations of special events and festivals and to support the operations
and capital expenditures of tourism - related facilities owned by nonprofit organizations. .
. ." RCW 67.28.1816(1) (emphasis added). The same legislation that added RCW 67.28.1816
also amended the definitions of "tourism promotion ", "operations ", and "tourism- related facility"
to allow the uses authorized by .1816. These amendments and RCW 67.28.1816 are set to
expire June 30, 2013. RCW 67.28.1816(5).
If the 2007 lodging tax amendments are not extended by the Legislature, then lodging tax funds
will be limited to the uses identified in .1815 (cost of tourism promotion, and acquisition or
operation of tourism - related facilities). Accordingly, the City will no longer be able to spend the
funds toward:
• operating any festival or special event — even if designed to attract tourists;
• marketing festivals or special events that are not designed to attract tourists; or
• the operation or capital expenditures of facilities owned by nonprofit organizations.
Past recipients of lodging tax revenues for such items include the HUB for operation of its facility
and ValleyFest for operation of its annual festival. Lodging tax funds will not be allowed for such
uses if the Legislature allows the sunset provisions to expire.
If the sunset provisions do expire, the City will only be able to spend lodging tax funds on:
• Marketing of special events and festivals designed to attract tourists;
• Acquisition and operation of tourism - related facilities in which the City has an ownership
interest; and
• Other costs of tourism promotion, which will be defined as "activities and expenditures
designed to increase tourism, including but not limited to advertising, publicizing, or
otherwise distributing information for the purpose of attracting and welcoming tourists;
developing strategies to expand tourism; operating tourism promotion agencies; and
funding the marketing of special events and festivals designed to attract tourists."
A bill (Substitute Senate Bill 6646) was proposed during this past Legislative session that would
have extended of the 2007 lodging tax amendments, and would have prevented the provisions
discussed above from expiring. The bill did not make it out of committee, and was not passed.
There will be one more Legislative session before the 2007 lodging tax amendments expires.
AWC representatives have stated that AWC will support another effort to get the Legislature to
extend the 2007 amendments during that session.
OPTIONS: None. Informational only.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: None.
BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: If the 2007 amendments to the lodging tax provisions expire,
the amounts available for disbursements will not be affected. The only impact will be on how
the lodging tax revenues may be disbursed.
STAFF CONTACT: Kelly E. Konkright, Deputy City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS: None
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 29, 2012
Department Director Approval: ❑
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Solid Waste Update
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None. Information item for May 22, 2012 meeting.
BACKGROUND: The Solid Waste Governance Task Force met Thursday, May 17, 2012, and
finalized the Scope of Work (see attached). Per the e -mail from Spokane County, they also
decided on a few items:
1. Please review the attached document and send in your jurisdictions' approval or
disapproval of it no later than May 301h at noon to Karen Corkins. If you have an
answer before that time, it would be greatly appreciated if you let us know so we can
move the process forward in a timely manner.
2. The technical committee that will field any questions about the Scope of Work and
respond to RFI's will include:
a. Todd Ableman
b. Bill Wedlake
c. Russ Menke
d. Mike Jackson or his assigned designee
3. The committee that will review the submitted RFP proposals is comprised of the
technical people above plus elected representatives:
e. Todd Ableman
f. Bill Wedlake
g. Russ Menke
h. Mike Jackson or his assigned designee
i. Mike Fagan
j. Al French
k. Gary Schimmels
I. Tom Trulove
m. Doug Parks
Thank you,
Karen Corkins, Executive Assistant
County Commissioner Al French
1116 West Broadway Avenue
Spokane, WA 99260
509 - 477 -2741
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: This is a non - action item, however, council has been
asked to consider sending notification of consensus approval or disapproval of the Scope of
Work, to Karen Corkins, Executive Assistant to County Commissioner Al French, no later than
May 301h at noon.
BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF /COUNCIL CONTACT: Deputy Mayor Schimmels, City Manager Jackson
ATTACHMENTS: Final Consolidated Waste Consultant Scope of Work
Evaluation of County -Wide Waste Transfer and Disposal
Systems for Spokane County
Background
The Spokane Regional Solid Waste System (System) was created in 1988 by Interlocal
agreement between the City of Spokane and Spokane County. There are currently 14
member jurisdictions comprising all of incorporated and unincorporated Spokane County.
The bonds that financed construction of the System facilities were refunded in 2011. Nearly
all current agreements and contracts related to the System have an expiration date of
November 16, 2014.
The System is administered as a department of the City of Spokane. System Facilities
consist of the Waste to Energy (WTE) facility and two transfer stations. The WTE processes
approximately 800 tons of trash per day. The annual System tonnage for MSW is
approximately 300K/tons /yr. Each of the three System facilities have large recycling areas
for collecting and processing recyclables, moderate risk waste and organics.
There are additional Non - System Facilities in the community that contribute to the handling
of the MSW, organics, and recyclables. These include the North Side Landfill, Graham Road
limited purpose landfill, Marshall Transfer Station, Sunshine Recyclers Valley Transfer
Station, multiple wood grinding businesses both mobile and fixed facilities and numerous
recycling centers. There is also an inter -model railroad facility that is currently servicing the
community by shipping waste by rail to a regional landfill.
As the end of the long -term obligation of the System stakeholders approaches, there is a
strong desire to investigate lower cost options that can be System Facilities, Non - System
Facilities, New Facilities or a combination of all while still maintaining appropriate levels of
service for our citizens. As such, the purpose of this evaluation is to explore and recommend
lower cost alternatives for transfer and disposal by gaining improved efficiencies at existing
facilities, considering alternative disposal options and exploring additional uses for the WTE
facility. All options analyzed and presented must be in compliance with Washington State
law.
Pagel of 3
Scope of Work
WASTE TO ENERGY PLANT
The consultant will evaluate the existing system and facilities for the following areas /items of
interest:
1. Identify current and project for a 5, 10, 15 and 20 year period the cost of operating the current
WTE Plant and the required tipping fee to cover said cost. Identify cost reduction options and
quantify the potential savings.
2. Identify current and project for a 5, 10, 15 and 20 year period the cost to provide a stand alone
Moderate Risk Waste Management program. Identify cost reduction options and quantify the
potential savings.
3. Identify current and project for a 5, 10, 15 and 20 year period the cost to provide a stand alone
Recycling and Waste Reduction Outreach Program. Identify cost reduction options and quantify
the potential savings.
4. Identify current and project for a 5, 10, 15 and 20 year period the cost to provide a standalone
Recycling of Organics program. Identify cost reduction options and quantify the potential
savings.
5. Identify and quantify potential savings to be achieved by implementing the following system
modifications:
Reduced hours /days of service to the public.
Disposal of ash to existing in- county landfill site verses long haul.
6. Analyze the feasibility and identify the economics of converting the WTE plant into a biomass
(wood chip, construction debris, hog fuel, waste that may command a disposal price including
oily waste, tires, medical wastes, waste requiring assured destruction, and MSW from businesses
willing to pay a premium to have their waste managed in a zero landfill manner) cogeneration
power plant.
7. Analyze the feasibility and identify the economics of converting the WTE Plant tipping floors
and top load pit into a transfer station, separate from the biomass cogeneration portion of the
plant.
8. Estimate the potential pricing scenarios for the sale of power generated by the WTE Plant
based upon the various fuel sources available. Projections should be for a 10 and 20 year time
fr ame.
9. Identify alternative uses and /or disposal options for the ash byproduct from the WTE Plant.
10. Identify program cost and potential revenue to be derived from the marketing of a premium
priced "special waste" program with the origin of waste being from inside the county and
imported from outside of the county.
Page 2 of 3
TRANSFER STATIONS
The consultant will evaluate the following areas /items of interest:
1. Compare and analyze the cost and impacts of the transfer stations being acquired and /or
operated by the public or private sector.
2. Identify and quantify potential savings to be achieved by implementing the following system
modifications:
Altering the hours /days of operation
Modifying the self -haul fee structure
3. Identify current and project for a 5, 10, 15 and 20 year period the cost per ton to provide a
standalone Moderate Risk Waste Program at the transfer stations. Identify cost reduction options
and quantify the potential savings.
4. Identify current and project for a 5, 10, 15 and 20 year period the cost per ton to provide a
standalone Recycling of Organics Program at the transfer stations. Identify cost reduction
options and quantify the potential savings.
5. Identify current and project for a 5, 10, 15 and 20 year period the cost to provide a stand alone
Recycling and Waste Reduction Outreach Program. Identify cost reduction options and quantify
the potential savings.
6. Estimate number, location, configuration of and cost to construct new transfer stations
assuming that all existing transfer stations were not present. Compare the cost of the construction
of the new transfer stations by a public entity verses a private sector company.
LONG HAUL SYSTEM
1. Estimate disposal cost to the system based upon the following tonnage amounts; 50,000 tons
per year, 100,000 tons per year, 200,000 tons per year, and 300,000 tons per year.
2. Estimate disposal cost to the system based upon the following contract periods; 5 year, 10
year, and 20 year.
3. Identify and project cost of infrastructure needs beyond transfer stations for long haul disposal.
Compare the cost of the construction of the additional infrastructure needs by a public entity
verses a private sector company.
Page 3 of 3
DRAFT
ADVANCE AGENDA
For Planning Discussion Purposes Only
as of May 24, 2012; 8:30 a.m.
Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative
To: Council & Staff
From: City Clerk, by direction of City Manager
Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings
June 5, 2012 (CONFIRMED no meeting)
June 12, 2012, Special Meeting Council /Staff Budget Retreat: 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. CenterPlace
June 12, 2012, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, June 41
1. PUBLIC HEARING: Draft 2013 -2018 Six -Year TIP — Steve Worley ( -15 minutes)
2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes)
3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance Amending Title 24 — John Hohman (10 minutes)
4. Motion Consideration: Bid Award — Pavement Preservation Project Phase 1— Steve Worley (15 minutes)
5. Admin Report: Project Access Update (15 minutes)
6. Admin Report: Proposed Comp Plan Amendment CPA 05 -12 (601 N Conklin) — Mike Basinger (30 minutes)
7. Admin Report: Street Standards — John Hohman, Gabe Gallinger (20 minutes)
8. Admin Report: Street Illumination — John Hohman, Gabe Gallinger (15 minutes)
[ *estimated meeting: 125 minutes]
June 19 22, 2012: Association of Washington Cities Annual Conference, Vancouver, Wa.
June 19, 2012 (CONFIRMED no meeting)
June 26, 2012, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, June 181
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes)
2. Proposed Resolution: Adoption of Draft 2013 -2018 Six -Year TIP — Steve Worley (10 minutes)
3. Admin Report: City's Ten Year Anniversary — Carolbelle Branch (15 minutes)
4. Info Only: Department Reports [ *estimated meeting: minutes]
July 3, 2012, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, June 251
1. Advance Agenda
July 10, 2012, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, July 21
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
July 17, 2012, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, July 91
1. Shoreline Master Program (SMP) Goals and Policies — Lori Barlow (30 minutes)
2. Graffiti, Code Enforcement — Cary Driskell (20 minutes)
3. Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
[ *estimated meeting: minutes]
Draft Advance Agenda 5/24/2012 2:31:37 PM Page 1 of 2
July 24, 2012, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. Shoreline Master Program (SMP) Goals and Policies — Lori Barlow
3. Info Only: Department Reports
July 31, 2012, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda
[due Mon, July 161
(5 minutes)
(30 minutes)
[ *estimated meeting: minutes]
[due Mon, July 231
August 7, 2012, Study Session Format (CONFIRMED no meeting — National Night Out)
August 14, 2012, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Aug 61
1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2013 Budget (estimated revenues & expenditures)
2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes)
3. Proposed Resolution: Shoreline Master Program (SMP) Goals and Policies — Lori Barlow (20 minutes)
4. Admin Report: 2013 Budget- Estimated Revenues & Expenditures (20 minutes)
[ *estimated meeting: minutes]
August 21, 2012, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Donation Policy — Mike Stone
2. Advance Agenda
August 28, 2012, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. Info Only: Department Reports
ADA Transition Plan
Bidding Contracts (SVMC 3. — bidding exceptions)
Budget Amendment, 2012
Centennial Trail Agreement
City Hall Renovation
Contracts, Annual Renewals, histories, etc.
Decant Discussion
Emergency Management Interlocal
Greenacres Trail Grant
Investment Accounts
Manufactured Homes
Outside agencies (mid Sept)
Pedestrian/Bicycle Grant Program
Planning Commission Rules of Procedure
Prosecution Services
Revenue Policy, Cost Recovery
Speed Limits (overall system)
Spokane Valley Municipal Code 8.25.025(F)
Sprague Appleway Corr. Environ.Assessment (9 -30)
Stormwater Projects
[due Mon, Aug 13]]
(25 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[due Mon, Aug 20]
*time for public or council comments not included
Draft Advance Agenda 5/24/2012 2:31:37 PM Page 2 of 2
S 611&ne
..;oolOValley
11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.921,1000 ♦ Fax: 509,921,1008 ♦ dtyhak1@spokanevalley,org
Memorandum
To: Mike Jackson, City Manager
From: Mark Calhouri, Finance Director
Date: May 22, 2012
Re Finance Department Activity Report — April 2012
2011 Yearend Process
The 2011 books were closed March 23, 2012. The general accounting work required to
accomplish this included determining that revenue and expenditure activity was posted to the
correct year and accounts, analyzing account balances and preparing closing entries. The
annual report preparation is underway in anticipation of the annual audit which we anticipate will
begin sometime in June 2012.
2093 Budget Development Process
Preliminary work on the 2013 Budget continued with City Department Directors and Staff
receiving instructions on expectations related to the simultaneous development of the business
plan and budget. Due date of this portion of the process is May 16, and this will lead to the
Council's first discussion on the 2012 Budget that will be one of the topics discussed at the June
12, 2012 retreat.
IISV- FS21Userslmcalhoun\Finance Activity Reports1201212012 04.docx Page 1
Budget to Actual Comparison Report (pages 5 — 17)
A report reflecting 2012 Budget to Actual Revenues and Expenditures for those funds for which
a 2012 Budget was adopted and subsequently amended is located on pages 5 through 17.
Because we attempt to provide this information in a timely manner this report is prepared from
records that are not formally closed by the Finance Department at month end or reconciled to
bank records. Although it is realistic to expect the figures will change over subsequent weeks, I
believe the report is materially accurate.
You will note that the format of the report is identical to pages 20 through 32 of the 2012 Budget
document. We've included the following information in the report:
• Revenues by source for all funds, and expenditures by department in the General Fund and
by type in all other funds.
• A breakdown between recurring and nonrecurring revenues and expenditures in the General
Fund, Street O &M Fund and Stormwater Fund.
• The change in fund balance including beginning and ending figures. The beginning fund
balance figures are those that will be reflected in our 2011 Annual Financial Report.
• Columns of information include:
o The 2012 Budget as adopted and subsequently amended on February 28, 2012.
o April 2012 activity.
o Cumulative 2012 activity through April 2012.
o Budget remaining in terms of dollars.
o The percent of budgeted revenue collected or budgeted expenditures disbursed.
A few points related to the General Fund #001 (page 5):
Recurring revenues collections are currently at 18.59% of the amount budgeted with 33.3% of
the year elapsed. This is typical and reflective of the nature of the timing of when revenues are
collected.
• Property tax collections are currently just $640,301 or 5.92% of the amount budgeted. This
is because property taxes are paid to Spokane County in two installments each year on April
30 and October 31. These monies are then remitted to the City in May and November.
• Sales tax collections are currently just $3,667,009 or 25.81% of the amount budgeted. This
is because taxes collected in April are not remitted to the City by the State until the latter
part of May.
• Gambling taxes are just $9,821 or 1.53% of the amount budgeted. This is because they are
paid quarterly with first quarter payments due by April 30. Most of the returns were received
on the final day of April and actually booked as revenue the 1$t of May.
• Franchise Fee and Business Registration revenues are received in the month following a
calendar year quarter. Through April we have received first quarter payments of $306,072
or 24.18% of the amount budgeted.
• State shared revenues are composed of State of Washington distributions that include items
such as liquor board profits, liquor excise tax, streamlined sales tax mitigation and criminal
justice monies. Most of these revenues are paid by the State in the month following a
calendar quarter. Through April we've received first quarter remittances totaling $448,970
or 24.48% of the amount budgeted.
• Service revenues are largely composed of building permit and plan review fees as well as
false alarm fees and right of way permits. Revenues are currently $339,822 or 26.14% of
the amount budgeted.
• Fines and forfeitures revenues are composed of monthly remittances from Spokane County
with payments made in the month following the actual assessment of a fine. Through April
2012 we've received remittances for the period January through March with receipts of
$343,594 or 18.08% of the amount budgeted.
\\SV- FS21UsersMcalhoun\Finance Activity Reports1201212012 04.docx Page 2
• Recreation program fees are composed of revenues generated by the variety of parks and
recreation programs including classes, swimming pools (in- season), and CenterPlace.
Currently, revenues total $197,308 or 34.62% of the amount budgeted.
Recurring expenditures are currently at 28.92% of the amount budgeted with 33.3% of the year
elapsed. Departments experience seasonal fluctuations in activity so they don't necessarily
expend their budget in twelve equal monthly installments. At this point the Council budget is
38.41 % expended and this can be explained by the January 2012 payment of annual dues to
AWC and the NLC for a total cost of $67,655.
Investments (page 18)
Investments at March 31 total $47,923,991 and are composed of $42,895,901 in the
Washington State Local Government Investment Pool and $5,028,090 in bank CDs.
Total Sales Tax Receipts (page 19)
Total sales tax receipts are $4,145,885 including general, criminal justice and public safety
taxes. This figure is $207,386 (5.27 %) greater than for the same 3 -month period in 2011.
Including the latter half of 2011 sales taxes have shown an impressive increase but an increase
of just 1.31 % in the March 2012 State remittance is a reminder that the economic recovery is
still tenuous.
Economic Indicators (pages 20 — 22)
The following economic indicators provide information pertaining to three different sources of tax
revenue that provide a good gauge of the health and direction of the overall economy.
1. Sales taxes (page 20) provide a sense of how much individuals and businesses are
spending on the purchase of goods.
2. Hotel 1 Motel taxes (page 21) provide us with a sense of overnight stays and visits to our
area by tourists or business travelers.
3. Real Estate Excise taxes (page 22) provide us with a sense of real estate sales.
Page 20 provides a monthly history of general sales tax receipts (not including public safety or
criminal justice) beginning with the first remittance received in May 2003.
• Compared with calendar year 2011 collections, 2012 collections increased by $200,542 or
5.79 %.
• Tax receipts peaked in 2007 at $17.4 million and dropped off dramatically in the subsequent
three years.
• Receipts thus far in 2012 are similar to 2006 and 2009 collections, essentially straddling the
peak years of 2007 and 2008.
Page 21 provides a monthly history of hotel /motel tax receipts beginning with the first remittance
in May 2003.
• Compared with calendar year 2011 collections, 2012 collections have decreased by $970 or
1.39 %.
• Collections peaked in 2007 and 2008, dropped off in 2009 (although significantly less than
the drop in sales taxes) and have shown a nice recovery beginning in 2010.
Page 22 provides a monthly history of real estate excise tax receipts beginning with the first
remittance in March 2003.
• Compared with calendar year 2011 collections, 2012 collections have decreased by $21,330
or 10.91 %.
• Tax receipts peaked in 2007 at nearly $2.6 million, decreased precipitously in 2008 and
2009, and appear to have leveled off in 2010 and 2011.
I1SV- FS21Userslmca1houn\Finance Activity Reports1201212012 04.docx Page 3
Debt Capacity and Bonds Outstanding (page 23)
This page provides information on the City's debt capacity, or the dollar amount of General
Obligation (G.O.) Bonds the City may issue, as well as an amortization schedule of the bonds
the City currently has outstanding.
• The maximum amount of G.O. bonds the City may issue is determined by the assessed
value and the 2011 assessed value for 2012 property taxes is $7,087,523,395. Following
the City's December 1, 2011 bond payment, the City currently has $7,930,000 of nonvoted
G.O. bonds outstanding which represents 7.46% of our nonvoted bond capacity, and 1.49%
of our total debt capacity for all types of bonds.
• The $7,930,000 of bonds the City currently has outstanding is part of the 2003 nonvoted
(LTGO) bond issue. Of this amount:
• $6,260,000 remains on bonds issued for the construction of CenterPlace. These bonds
are repaid with a portion of the 1110 of 1% sales tax that is collected by the Spokane
Public Facilities District.
• $1,670,000 remains on bonds issued for road and street improvements around
CenterPlace. The bonds are repaid with a portion of the real estate excise tax collected
by the City.
I1SV- FS21Userslmcalhoun\Finance Activity Reports1201212012 04.docx Page 4
P:IFinancelFor City CouncillCouncil Monthly Reports1201212012 04 30 report
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2012
#001 - GENERAL FUND
RECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
Property Tax
Sales Tax
Criminal Justice Tax
Public safety Sales Tax
Gambling Tax and Leasehold Excise Tax
Franchise Fees /Business Registration
State Shared Revenues
Service Revenues
Fines and Forfeitures
Recreation Program Fees
Miscellaneous & Investment Interest
Transfer -in -#101 (street admin)
Transfer -in - #105 (h/m tax -CP advertising)
Transfer -in - #402 (storm admin)
Total Recurring Revenues
Expenditures
City Council
City Manager
Legal
Public Safety
Deputy City Manager
Finance
Human Resources
Public Works
Community Development - Administration
Community Development - Engineering
Community Development - Planning
Community Development - Building
Parks & Rec - Administration
Parks & Rec - Maintenance
Parks & Rec - Recreation
Parks & Rec -Aquatics
Parks & Rec - Senior Center
Parks & Rec - CenterPlace
General Government
Transfers out - #502 (insurance premium)
Total Recurring Expenditures
Recurring Revenues Over (Under)
Recurring Expenditures
NONRECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
nla
Total Nonrecurring Revenues
Budget Year
Elapsed = 33.3%
2012
Actual Actual thru Budget % of
Budget April April 30 Remaining Budget
10,808,900
343,744
640,301
(10,168,599)
5.92%
14,210,000
1,067,733
3,667,009
(10,542,991)
25.81%
1,200,000
89,848
304,970
(895,030)
25.41%
790,000
50,472
173,907
(616,094)
22.01%
640,000
7,642
9,821
(630,179)
1.53%
1,266,000
281,871
306,072
(959,928)
24.18%
1,834,300
177,107
448,970
(1,385,330)
24.48%
1,300,000
45,113
339,822
(960,178)
26.14%
1,900,000
115,317
343,594
(1,556,406)
18.08%
570,000
51,052
197,308
(372,692)
34.62%
305,000
8,757
40,081
(264,919)
13.14%
39,600
3,300
13,200
(26,400)
33.33%
30,000
5
85
(29,915)
0.28%
15,000
1,250
5,000
(10,000)
33.33%
34,908,800
2,243,212
6,490,140
(28,418,660)
18.59%
386,249
26,849
148,365
237,884
38.41%
631,667
53,693
178,848
452,819
28,31%
434,798
41,648
142,935
291,863
32.87%
22,000,000
1,650,479
6,586,024
15,413,976
29.94%
658,884
34,382
156,428
502,456
23.74%
1,047,107
75,995
307,930
739,177
29.41%
230,231
17,427
68,322
161,909
29.68%
901,519
49,280
210,430
691,089
23.34%
323,743
25,041
101,006
222,737
31,20%
680,796
55,350
217,240
463,556
31.91%
994,245
72,771
266,958
727,287
26.85%
1,260,454
113,082
460,741
799,713
36.55%
263,128
18,968
84,133
178,995
31.97%
803,700
60,153
181,825
621,875
22.62%
229,811
8,067
38,615
191,196
16.80%
442,250
1,378
6,346
435,904
1.43%
92,961
6,118
25,856
67,105
27.81%
1,119,357
84,710
334,975
784,382
29.93%
1,840,500
81,924
398,802
1,441,698
21.67%
319,000
26,583
106,333
212,667
33.33%
34,660,400
2,503,897
10,022,112
24,638,288
28.92%
248,400 (260,685) (3,531,972) (3,780,372)
0 0 0 0 #DIV101
0 0 0 0 #DIV101
Expenditures
Contingency/ Emergency (I% of recur exp)
346,600
0
0
346,600
0.00%
Transfers out - #303
89,500
0
0
89,500
0.00%
Transfers out - #309 (park grant match)
100,000
8,333
33,333
66,667
33.33%
Transfers out - #311 (xx% > $26million)
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
Building permit software purchase
0
0
0
0
#DIVl01
Total Nonrecurring Expenditures
536,100
8,333
33,333
502,767
6.22%
Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under)
Nonrecurring Expenditures
(536,100)
(8,333)
(33,333)
502,767
Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues
Over (Under) Total Expenditures
(287,700)
(269,018)
(3,565,306)
(3,277,606)
Beginning fund balance
28,045,203
28,045,203
Ending fund balance
27,757,503
24,479,897
Page 5
P:1FinancelFor City CounciACouncil Monthly Repo rts1201212012 04 30 report
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
0
30,000
128,248
Budget Year
#DIV10!
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
0
0
Elapsed
0
For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2012
Interfund Transfers in - #001
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
Interfund Transfers in - #122
0
2012
0
0
#DIVIO!
Interfund Transfers in - #302
Actual
Actual thru
Budget
% of
#DIVI01
Budget
April
April 30
Remaining
Budget
SPECIAL- REVENUE FUNDS
Miscellaneous
0
733
1,473
1,473
#101 - STREET FUND
Total Nonrecurring Revenues
0
30,733
129,721
129,721
RECURRING ACTIVITY
Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues
Revenues
Over (Under) Total Expenditures
(528,463)
213,742
269,556
798,019
Motor Vehicle Fuel (Gas) Tax
1,897,800
144,297
439,112
(1,458,688)
23.14%
Investment Interest
5,000
298
841
(4,159)
16.81%
Insurance Premiums & Recoveries
0
359
9,360
9,360
#DIV101
Utility Tax
3,000,000
234,113
689,005
(2,310,995)
22.97%
Miscellaneous Revenue
0
0
0
0
#DIVI01
Total Recurring Revenues
4,902,800
379,067
1,138,317
(3,764,483)
23.22%
Expenditures
Wages I Benefits 1 Payroll Taxes
522,142
49,510
214,504
307,638
41.08%
Supplies
72,200
24,449
251,989
(179,789)
349.02%
Services & Charges
3,310,321
82,629
400,946
2,909,375
12.11%
Intergovernmental Payments
847,000
26,174
90,665
756,335
10.70%
Interfund Transfers -out - #001
39,600
3,300
13,200
26,400
33.33%
Interfund Transfers -out - #103 (MVFT)
0
0
0
0
#DIVI01
Interfund Transfers-out - #501 (plow replace.)
100,000
8,333
33,333
66,667
33.33%
Interfund Transfers
0
0
0
0
#DIVl01
Streets Misc. projects
0
0
0
0
#DIVl01
Total Recurring Expenditures
4,891,263
194,396
1,004,638
3,886,625
20.54%
Recurring Revenues Over (Under)
Recurring Expenditures
11,537
184,672
133,679
122,142
NONRECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
Grants
0
30,000
128,248
128,248
#DIV10!
Utility Taxes
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
Interfund Transfers in - #001
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
Interfund Transfers in - #122
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
Interfund Transfers in - #302
0
0
0
0
#DIVI01
Interfund Transfers in - #402
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
Miscellaneous
0
733
1,473
1,473
#DIVIO!
Total Nonrecurring Revenues
0
30,733
129,721
129,721
#DIVIO!
Expenditures
BridgelStreet Maintenance
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
Interfund Transfers -out - #303 (Evergreen Rd)
500,000
0
(11,205)
511,205
- 124%
Grant financed capital
0
1,663
5,049
(5,049)
#DIVIO!
Capital Outlay
40,000
0
0
40,000
0.00%
Snow Plow purchase (budgeted in 2010 delivered h
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
Total Nonrecurring Expenditures
540,000
1,663
(6,157)
546,157
-1.14%
Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under)
Nonrecurring Expenditures
(540,000)
29,070
135,877
675,877
Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues
Over (Under) Total Expenditures
(528,463)
213,742
269,556
798,019
Beginning fund balance
2,489,734
2,489,734
Ending fund balance
1,961,271
2,759,290
Page 6
P:IFinance\For City Council\Council Monthly Reports1201 21201 2 04 30 report
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2012
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS - continued
#103 - PATHS & TRAILS
Revenues
Motor Vehicle Fuel (Gas) Tax
Interfund Transfer-in #101 (MVFT)
Investment Interest
Total revenues
Expenditures
IF Transfer for Trails /Paths Cap Prj
Miscellaneous
Capital Outlay
Total expenditures
Revenues over (under) expenditures
Beginning fund balance
Ending fund balance
#105 - HOTEL/ MOTEL TAX FUND
Revenues
Hotel /Motel Tax
Investment Interest
Subtotal revenues
Expenditures
Interfund Transfers - #001
Tourism Promotion
Subtotal expenditures
Revenues over (under) expenditures
Beginning fund balance
Ending fund balance
Budget Year
Elapsed = 333%
2012
Actual Actual thru Budget % of
Budget April April 30 Remaining Budget
8,000
0
0
(8,000)
0.00%
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
0
4
12
12
#DIV101
8,000
4
12
(7,988)
0.15%
0
0
0
0
#DIVI01
0
0
0
0
#DIV /O!
0
0
0
0
#DIV/O!
0
0
0
0
#DIWDI
8,000 4 12 (7,988)
56,084 56,084
64,084 56,096
430,000 25,655 68,646 (361,354) 15.96%
700 34 98 (602) 13.93%
430,700 25,689 68,743 (361,957) 15.96%
30,000
0
0
30,000 0.00%
400,700
10,000
10,000
390,700 2.50%
430,700
10,000
10,000
420,700 2.32%
0
15,689
58,743
(782,657)
257,932
257,932
257,932
316,675
Page 7
P:1Finance\For City CouncillCouncil Monthly Reports1201212012 04 30 report
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2012
Budget Year
Elapsed = 33.3%
Expenditures
Operations
Total expenditures
Revenues over (under) expenditures
Beginning fund balance
Ending fund balance
#122 - WINTER WEATHER RESERVE FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest
Interfund Transfer
Subtotal revenues
Expenditures
Reserve for Winter Weather
Total expenditures
Revenues over (under) expenditures
Beginning fund balance
Ending fund balance
#123 - CIVIC FACILITIES REPLACEMENT FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest
Interfund Transfer - #001
Total revenues
Expenditures
Capital Outlay
Total expenditures
Revenues over (under) expenditures
Beginning fund balance
Ending fund balance
0
Budget
Actual
Aril
2092
Actual thru
Aril 30
Budget
Remaining
% of
Budget
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS - continued
0
0
#DIV /O!
10,000
566
#120 - CENTER PLACE OPERATING RESERVE FUND
(8,381)
5,432,428
5,432,428
Revenues
5,442,428
5,434,047
Investment Interest
700
36
104
(596)
14.89%
Interfund Transfer
0
0
0
0
#❑IVI01
Total revenues
700
36
104
(596)
14.89%
Expenditures
0
#DIV101
0
0
0
Operations
0
0
0
0
#DIV /O!
Total expenditures
0
0
0
0
#DIV10!
Revenues over (under) expenditures
700
36
104
(596)
Beginning fund balance
350,787
350,787
Ending fund balance
351,487
350,891
#121 - SERVICE LEVEL STABILIZATION RESERVE FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest
10,000
566
1,619
(8,381)
16.19%
Interfund Transfer
0
0
0
0
#DIV /01
Total revenues
10,000
566
1,619
(8,381)
16.19%
Expenditures
Operations
Total expenditures
Revenues over (under) expenditures
Beginning fund balance
Ending fund balance
#122 - WINTER WEATHER RESERVE FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest
Interfund Transfer
Subtotal revenues
Expenditures
Reserve for Winter Weather
Total expenditures
Revenues over (under) expenditures
Beginning fund balance
Ending fund balance
#123 - CIVIC FACILITIES REPLACEMENT FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest
Interfund Transfer - #001
Total revenues
Expenditures
Capital Outlay
Total expenditures
Revenues over (under) expenditures
Beginning fund balance
Ending fund balance
0
0
0
0
#DIV /01
0
0
0
0
#DIV /O!
10,000
566
1,619
(8,381)
5,432,428
5,432,428
5,442,428
5,434,047
700
55
157
(543)
22.43%
0
0
0
0
#DIV /O!
700
55
157
(543) _
22.43%
0
0
0
0
#DIV101
0
0
0
0
4DIV /01
700
55
157
(543)
502,005
502,005
602,706
502,162
2,000 130 373 (1,627) 18.67%
397,000 33,083 132,333 (264,667) 33,33%
399,000 33,214 132,707 (266,293) 33.26%
0 0 0 0 #DIVIO!
0 0 0 0 #DIVIO!
399,000 33,214 132,707 (266,293)
2,004,848 2,004,848
2,403,648 2,137,555
Page 8
P:1FinanceTor City CounciRCouncil Monthly Reports1201212012 04 30 report
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2012
Budget Year
Elapsed = 33.3%
2012
Actual Actual thru Budget % of
Budget April April 30 Remaining Budget
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
432,320
0 (36,079)
468,399 -8.35%
Debt Service Payments - Roads
185,303
#204 - DEBT SERVICE FUND
200,766 -8.34%
Total expenditures
617,623
0 (511,542)
669,165 -6.35%
Revenues
0
0 51,542
(1,286,7
Beginning fund balance
0
Spokane Public Facilities District
432,320
0
0
(432,320)
0.00%
Interfund Transfer -In - #301
92,652
0
0
(92,652)
0.00%
Interfund Transfer -in - #302
92,651
0
0
(92,651)
0.00%
Total revenues
617,623
0
0
(617,623)
0.00%
Expenditures
Debt Service Payments - CenterPlace
432,320
0 (36,079)
468,399 -8.35%
Debt Service Payments - Roads
185,303
0 (15,463)
200,766 -8.34%
Total expenditures
617,623
0 (511,542)
669,165 -6.35%
Revenues over (under) expenditures
0
0 51,542
(1,286,7
Beginning fund balance
0
0
Ending fund balance
0
51,542
Page 9
PAFinanceTor City Council\Council Monthly Reports1201212012 04 30 report
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
475,000
35,865
Budget Year
(387,899)
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
Interfund Transfer -out - #204
92,652
Elapsed =
33.3%
For the Four-Month Period Ended April 30, 2012
0.00%
Interfund Transfer -out- #303
363,627
0
95,817
267,810
2012
Total expenditures
456,279
0
Actual
Actual thru
Budget
% of
Budget
April
April 30
Remaining
Budget
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS
772,072
0
772,072
0
#301 - CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Ending fund balance
791,193
0
763,561
Revenues
0.00%
Interfund Transfer -out - #303
1,448,059
0
REET 1 - Taxes 475,000
35,865
87,102
(387,899)
18.34%
Investment Interest 400
71
204
(196)
50.91%
Interfund Transfer -in - #303 0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
Total revenues 475,400
35,936
87,305
388,095
18.36%
Expenditures
475,000
35,865
87,101
(387,899)
18.34%
Interfund Transfer -out - #204
92,652
0
0
92,652
0.00%
Interfund Transfer -out- #303
363,627
0
95,817
267,810
26.35%
Total expenditures
456,279
0
95,817
360,462
21.00%
Revenues over (under) expenditures
19,121
35,936
(8,511)
(748,557)
Beginning fund balance
772,072
0
772,072
0
#DIVIO!
Ending fund balance
791,193
0
763,561
92,651
0.00%
#302 SPECIAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
REET 2 - Taxes
475,000
35,865
87,101
(387,899)
18.34%
Investment Interest
2,000
110
313
(1,687)
15.66%
Interfund Transfer -in - #307
0
0
4,393
4,393
#DIVIO!
Total revenues
477,000
35,974
91,808
(385,192)
19.25%
Expenditures
Interfund Transfer -out - #101
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
Interfund Transfer -out - #204
92,651
0
0
92,651
0.00%
Interfund Transfer -out - #303
1,448,059
0
12,368
1,435,691
0.85%
Interfund Transfer -out - #307
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
Interfund Transfer -out - #308
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
Total expenditures
1,540,710
0
12,368
1,528,342
0.80%
Revenues over (under) expenditures
(1,063,710)
35,974
79,440
(1,913,535)
Beginning fund balance
1,630,303
1,630,303
Ending fund balance
566,593
1,709,743
Page 10
P:IFinancelFor City CouncilkCouncil Monthly Reports1201212012 04 30 report
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget Year
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
Elapsed =
33.3%
For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2012
2012
Actual
Actual thru
Budget
% of
Budget
April
April 30
Remaining
Budget
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS - continued
0303 STREET CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
Grant Proceeds
7,828,118
49,590
77,458
(7,750,660)
0.99%
Developer Contribution
275,000
0
0
(275,000)
0.00%
Miscellaneous
0
900
1,400
1,400
#DIV /01
Interfund Transfer -in - #001
89,000
0
0
(89,000)
0.00%
Interfund Transfer -in - #101
0
0
(19,205)
(11,205)
#DIV /01
Interfund Transfer -in - #301
363,627
0
95,817
(267,810)
26.35%
Interfund Transfer -in - #302
1,448,059
0
12,368
(1,435,691)
0.85%
Interfund Transfer -in - #311
811,000
0
935,775
(675,225)
16.74%
Interfund Transfer -in - #401
0
0
0
0
#DIV /O!
Interfund Transfer -in
0
0
0
0
#DIV /01
Total revenues
10,814,804
50,490
311,612
(10,503,192)
2.88%
Expenditures
005 PineslMansfield, Wilbur Rd, to Pines
463,312
4,817
9,515
453,797
2.05%
060 Argonne Rd Corridor Upgrade SRTC 06 -31
802,792
22,231
61,185
741,607
7.62%
061 Pines (SR27) ITS Imporvement SRTC 06 -26
1,766,201
1,920
17,369
1,748,832
0.98%
063 Broadway Ave Safety Project- Pines
0
0
9,747
(1,747)
#DIV /0!
065 Sprague /Sullivan
0
(7,240)
(7,240)
7,240
#DIV10!
069 Park Road Reconstruction #2
0
0
139
(139)
#DIVI01
112 Indiana Avenue Extension
0
117
8,636
(8,636)
#DIV /01
113 Ind!analSullivan PCC Intersection
0
0
1,277
(1,277)
#DIV /0!
115 Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Evergreen to Sullivan
1,582,000
21,782
108,548
1,473,452
6.86%
123 Mission Ave -Flora to Barker
300,000
0
109
299,691
0.04%
141 Sullivan & Euclid PCC
26,289
1,088
6,735
19,554
25.62%
142 Broadway @ ArgonnelMullan
138,150
0
427
137,723
0.31%
145 Spokane Valley- Millwood Trail
447,000
121
2,849
444,151
0,64%
146 24th Ave Sidewalk - Adams to Sullivan
278,520
1,521
7,060
271,460
2.53%
148 Greenacres Trail - Design
60,000
0
2,620
57,380
4.37%
149 In -House Design - Sidewalk Infill
398,250
3,962
46,193
352,057
11.60%
151 Green Haven STEP
0
404
704
(704)
#DIV101
154 Sidewalk & Tansit Stop Accessibility
182,290
1,120
3,179
179,111
134%
155 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement
600,000
62,557
71,669
528,331
11.94%
156 Mansfield Ave. Connection
738,000
252
744
737,256
0.10%
University Rd 1 1 -90 Overpass Study
284,000
0
0
284,000
0.00%
157 Temporary Sullivan Bridge Repairs
200,000
55,523
191,298
8,702
95.65%
160 Evergreen Rd Pres. 16th -32nd
959,000
25,812
60,351
898,649
6.29%
Contingency
1,500,000
0
0
1,500,000
0.00%
Total expenditures
10,725,804
195,987
595,115
10,130,689
5.55%
Revenues over (under) expenditures
89,000
(145,497)
(283,503)
(20,633,881)
Beginning fund balance
73,648
73,646
Ending fund balance
162,646
(209,857)
Page 11
P:1FinancelFor City Counc!INCouncil Monthly Repo rts1201 21201 2 04 30 report
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
183,535
183,535
#DIV10I
Budget Year
0
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
#DIVIO!
0
Elapsed
0
For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2012
0
0
0
#DIV /01
147
147
2012
179,000
Actual
Actual thru
Budget
% of
Budget
Aril
April 30
Remaining
Budget
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS - continued
#304 - MIRABEAU PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
Other Miscellaneous Revenue
0
0
0
0 #DIVIO!
Investment Interest
0
3
8
8 #DIV101
Total revenues
0
3
8
8 #DIVIO!
Expenditures
Capital Outlays
0
0
0
0 #DIV101
Transfers
0
0
0
0 #DIVIO!
Total expenditures
0
0
0
0 #DIV /O!
Revenues over(under)expenditures
0
3
8
8
Beginning fund balance
44,347
44,347
Ending fund balance
44,347
44,355
#307 - CAPITAL GRANTS FUND
Revenues
Grant Proceeds
Miscellaneous
Interfund Transfer -in - #302
Interfund Transfer -in
Total revenues
Expenditures
069 Broadway - 190 to Park Road (Trans to #302)
088 Broadway - Moore to Flora
Total expenditures
Revenues over (under) expenditures
Beginning fund balance
Ending fund balance
179,142
183,535
183,535
#DIV10I
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
0
0
0
#DIVl0!
0
0
0
#DIV /01
0 179,142 183,535 183,535 #DIVIO!
0
0
4,393
(4,393) #DIVIO!
0
0
289
(289) #DiV101
0
0
4,682
(4,682) #DiV10?
0
179,142
178,853
188,217
147
147
147
179,000
Page 12
P:IF!nance\For City CouncillCouncil Monthly Reports1201212012 04 30 report
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2012
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS - continued
#308 - BARKER BRIDGE FUND
Revenues
Grant Proceeds
Developer Contribution
Interfund Transfer -in - #302
Total revenues
Expenditures
Bridge Reconstruction
Total expenditures
Revenues over (under) expenditures
Beginning fund balance
Ending fund balance
#309 - PARKS CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
Budget Year
Elapsed = 33.3%
j 2012
Actual Actual thru Budget % of
Budget April April 30 Remainin Budget
0
0
0
0
#DIV /01
0
0
0
0
#DIV101
0
0
0
0
#DIV/O!
0
0
0
0
#DIV /O!
8,384
33,508
(66,492)
33.51%
#DIVIO!
0
0
0
0
#DIVIOI
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
0
0
0
0
0
Grant Proceeds
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
Interfund Transfer -in - #001
100,000
8,333
33,333
(66,667)
33.33%
Investment Interest
0
51
175
175
#DIV101
Total revenues
100,000
8,384
33,508
(66,492)
33.51%
_Expenditures
Terrace View Park Shelter
0
0
0
0
#DIVI01
Terrace View Park Play Equipment
120,000
0
0
120,000
0.00%
Contingency
50,000
0
0
50,000
0.00%
Greenacres Park
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
Valley Mission Park
0
0
0
0
#DIV101
Discovery (Universal) Park
0
0
0
0
#DIV /0!
Total expenditures
170,000
0
0
170,000
0.00%
Revenues over (under) expenditures
(70,000)
8,384
33,508
(236,492)
Beginning fund balance
411,151
411,151
Ending fund balance
341,151
444,659
Page 13
P:1Finance\For City CouncilkCouncil Monthly ReportM201212012 04 30 report
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2012
Budget Year
Elapsed = 33.3 %n
I
2012
0
0
0
Actual Actual thru
Budget
% of
Budget
April April 30
Remaining
Budget
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS - continued
0
719
719
#310 - CIVIC FACILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Facilities
0
Revenues
0
0
#DIVIO!
Interfund Transfers 0
0 0
0
#DIV10!
Investment Interest 6,000
422 1,224
(4,776)
20,40%
Total revenues 6,000
422 1,224
(4,776)
20,40%
Expenditures
Interfund Transfers -out - #001
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
Capital - West Gateway at Th!erman
120,000
0
0
120,040
0.00 %
Balfour Park Purchase
0
719
719
Facilities
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
Total expenditures
120,000
719
719
120,000
0.60%
Revenues over(under)expenditures
(114,000)
(297)
505
(124,776)
Beginning fund balance
3,856,624
3,856,624
Ending fund balance
3,742,624
3,857,129
#311 -STREET CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 2011+
Revenues
Interfund Transfers in - #001 fxx % >$26mm)
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
Investment Interest
2,200
0
0
(2,200)
0.00%
Total revenues
2,200
0
0
(2,200)
0.00%
Expenditures
Facilities
0
1,920
1,920
(1,920)
#DIVIO!
Interfund Transfers -out - #303 - Sullivan
200,000
0
135,775
64,225
67.89 %fl
Interfund Transfers -out - #303- Evergreen
111,000
0
0
111,000
0.00%
Total expenditures
311,000
1,920
137,695
173,305
44.28%
Revenues over (under) expenditures
(308,800)
(1,920)
(137,695)
(175,505)
Beginning fund balance
1,084,681
1,084,681
Ending fund balance
775,881
946,986
Page 14
P:1Finance\For City CouncihCouncil Monthly Reports120121201 2 04 30 report
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2012
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
#402 - STORMWATER FUND
RECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
Stormwater Management Fees
Investment Interest
Miscellaneous
Total Recurring Revenues
Budget Year
Elapsed = 33.3%
2012 '
Actual Actual thru Budget % of
Budget Aril Aril 30 Remaining Budget
1,750,000 74,757 124,825 (1,625,175) 7.13%
5,000 162 453 (4,537) 9.25%
0 57 57 57 #DIVIO!
1,755,000 74,975 125,344 (1,629,656) 7.14%
Expenditures
0
0
0
#DIVro1
0
Wages 1 Benefits I Payroll Taxes
438,614
33,575
128,755
309,859
29.35%
Supplies
32,540
1,213
1,637
30,703
5.64%
Services & Charges
1,244,287
54,877
81,499
1,162,788
6.55%
Intergovernmental Payments
23,000
0
4
22,997
0.02%
Interfund Transfers- out - #001
15,000
1,250
5,000
10,000
33.33%
Interfund Transfers- out - #502
0
131
522
(522)
#DIVIOi
Total Recurring Expenditures
1,753,441
91,046
217,616
1,535,625
12.41%
Recurring Revenues Over (Under)
Recurring Expenditures
1,559
(16,071)
(92,272)
(93,831)
NONRECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
Grant Proceeds
Interfund Transfers -in - #101 (shop facility)
Total Nonrecurring Revenues
Expenditures
Interfund Transfers -out
Contracted maintenance
Div. 055 NPDES -Phase II program dev.
Capital - various projects
Shop Facility
Interfund Transfers -out - #101
Total Nonrecurring Expenditures
Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under)
Nonrecurring Expenditures
Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues
Over (Under) Total Expenditures
Beginning working capital
Ending working capital
153,667 0 3,428 (150,239) 2.23%
0 0 0 0 #DIV101
153,667 0 3,428 (150,239) 2.23%
0
0
0
0
#DIVro1
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
0
0
0
0
#DIV101
400,000
4,270
17,540
382,460
4.38%
0
0
0
0
#DIVI01
0
0
0
0
#DIVIOI
400,000
4,270
17,540
382,460
4.36%
(246,333)_ (4,270) (14,112) 232,221
(244,774) (20,341) (106,384). + 138,390
2,382,660 2,382,660
2,137,886 2,276,276
Page 15
P:1FinanceTor City Councll\Council Monthly Reports1201212012 04 30 report
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget Year
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
Elapsed
For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2012
2012
Actual
Actual thru
Budget
% of
Budget
Aril
Aril 30
Remaining
Budget
ENTERPRISE FUNDS - continued
#403 -AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA
Revenues
Spokane County
500,000
0
0
(500,000)
0.00%
Investment Interest
2,500
0
0
(2,500)
0.00%
Total revenues
502,500
0
0
_(502,500)
0.00%
Expenditures
Facilities
630,000
0
0
630,000
0.00%
Total expenditures
630,000
0
0
630,000
0.00%
Revenues over (under) expenditures
(127,500)
0
0
(1,132,500)
Beginning working capital
417,326
417,326
Ending working capital
289,826
417,326
Page 16
P;1FinanceWor City CouncilkCouncil Monthly ReportsVO1212012 04 30 report
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2012
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
#501 - ERBR FUND
Revenues
Interfund Transfer -in - #001
Interfund Transfer -in - #101 (plow replace.)
Investment Interest
Total revenues
Expenditures
Computer replacement lease
Software /Hardware replacement
Vehicle Replacement
Capital Outlay
Total expenditures
Revenues over (under) expenditures
Beginning working capital
Ending working capital
#502 - RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest
Interfund Transfer- #001
Total revenues
Expenditures
Services & Charges
Total expenditures
Revenues over (under) expenditures
Beginning working capital
Ending working capital
Budget Year
Elapsed = 33.3%
2012
Actual Actual thru Budget % of
Budget April April 30 Remaining Budget
0
1,612
6,448
6,448
#DIVIO!
100,000
8,333
33,333
(66,667)
33.33%
0
95
273
273
#DIV /01
100,000
10,041
40,054
(59,946)
40.05%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
#DIV /0!
#DIV101
#DIV101
0
0
0
0
#DIV /01
100,000
10,041
40,054
(59,946)
932,335
932,335
1,032,335
972,389
0
1
2
2
#DIVIO!
319,000
26,583
106,333
(212,667)
33.33%
319,000
26,584
106,335
(212,665)
33.33%
319,000
0
255,185
63,815
80.00%
319,000
0
255,185
63,815
80.00%
0
26,584
(148,850)
(276,480)
30,590
30,590
30,590
(118,260)
Page 17
P:IFinance\For City CoundhCouncil Monthly Reports1201212012 04 30 report
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Investment Report
For the Month of April, 2012
5/17/2012
Beginning
$ 43,326,780.28 $
3,023,651.45 $
2,004,438.36 $
Total
Deposits
LGIP-
BB CD 2
BB CD 3
Investments
Beginning
$ 43,326,780.28 $
3,023,651.45 $
2,004,438.36 $
48,354,870.09
Deposits
1,563,879.99
0.00
0.00
1,563,879.99
Withdrawls
(2,000,000,00)
0.00
0.00
(2,000,000.00)
Interest
5,240.55
0.00
0.00
5,240.55
Ending
$ 42,895,900.82 $
3,023,651.45 $
2,004,438.36 $
47,923,990.63
54.89
matures:
612812092
51412092
130.49
373.31
rate:
9.05%
0.38%
203.63
001 General Fund
101 Street Fund
103 Trails & Paths
105 Hotel /Motel
120 CenterPlace Operating Reserve
121 Service Level Stabilization Reserve
122 Winter Weather Reserve
123 Civic Facilities Replacement
301 Capital Projects
302 Special Capital Projects
303 Street Capital Projects Fund
304 Mirabeau Point Project
307 Capital Grants Fund
309 Parks Capital Project
310 Civic Buildings Capital Projects
402 Stormwater Management
403 Aquifer Protection Fund
501 Equipment Rental & Replacement
502 Risk Management
*Local Government Investment Pool
Balance
Earnings
Budge
I Current Period I Year to date
$ 29,283,624.21 $
3,202.20 $
16,871.07 $
145,000.00
2,729,077.14
298.43
840.64
5,000.00
37, 862.15
4.14
11.85
0.00
314,496.48
34.39
97.51
700.00
333,062.61
36.42
104.20
700.00
5,175,258.65
565.92
1,618.97
10,000.00
501,992.28
54.89
157.03
700.00
1,193,304.52
130.49
373.31
2,000.00
650,912.68
71.18
203.63
400.00
1,001,476.83
109.51
313.29
2,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
26,434.93
2.89
8.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
463,235.27
50.66
175.12
0.00
3,856,231.76
421.68
1,223.82
6,000.00
1,478,909.06
161.72
462.65
5,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2,500.00
873,026.82
95,47
273,11
0.00
5,085.24
0.56
1.59
0.00
$ 47,923,990.63 $
5,240.55 $
22,736.06 $
180,000.00
Page 18
P:IFinancelFor City CouncillCouncil Monthly Reports1201212012 04 30 report
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 1 5/17/2012
Sales Tax Receipts
Comparison of 2011 and 2012
Month
Received 2011
February 1,658,132.70
March 1,130,948.29
April 1,149,418.90
3,938,499.89
May
1,451,954.28
June
1,345,333.29
July
1,415,961.55
August
1,520,766.09
September
1,448,728.86
October
1,464,653.60
November
1,463,313.06
December
1,381,684.76
January
1,410,552.03
16,841,447.41
Difference
2012 $ %
1,792,084.16 133,951.46 8.08%
1,145,747.45 14,799.16 1.31%
1,208,053.80 58,634.90 5.10%
4,145,885.41 207,385.52 5,27%
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4,145,885.41
Sales tax receipts reported here reflect remittances for general sales tax, criminal justice
sales tax and public safety tax.
The sales tax rate for retail sales transacted within the boundaries of the City of Spokane
Valley is 8.7 %. The tax that is paid by a purchaser
at the point of sale is remitted by the
vendor to the Washington State Department of Revenue who then remits the taxes back to
the various agencies that have imposed the tax.
The allocation of the total 8.7% tax rate to
the agencies is as follows:
- State of Washington
6.50%
- City of Spokane Valley
0.85%
- Spokane County
0.15%
- Spokane Public Facilities District
0.10%
- Crminial Justice
0.10%
- Public Safety
0.10% *
2,20% local tax
- Juvenile Jail
0.10% *
- Mental Health
0,10% *
- Law Enforcement Communications
0,10% *
- Spokane Transit Authority
0.60%
8,70%
* Indicates voter approved sales taxes
In addition to the .85% reported above that the City receives, we also receive a portion of
the Criminal Justice and Public Safety sales taxes. The distribution of those taxes is
computed as follows:
Criminal Justice: The tax is assessed county -wide and of the total collected, the
State distributes 10% of the receipts to Spokane County, with the remainder
allocated on a per capita basis to the County and the cities within the County.
Public Safety: The tax is assessed county -wide and of the total collected, the
State distributes 60% of the receipts to Spokane County, with the remainder
allocated on a per capita basis to the cities within the County.
Page 19
11SV- FS21Usen;lmcalhoun\Tax Revenue\Sales Tax1201212012 sales tax collections
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
4,500,000
4,000,000
--
3,500,000
-
3,000,000
-
Sales Tax Collections -
March
■ February
2,000,000
■ January
1A 11
1,500,000
For the years 2003 through 2012
1,000,000
500,000
01
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
January
0
1,145,888
1,367,929
1,572,609
1,759,531
1,729, 680
1,484,350
1,491, 059
1,460, 548
1,589,887
February
0
962,431
917,747
1,068,743
1,155,947
1,129,765
1,098,575
963,749
990,157
1,009,389
March
0
909,472
1,015,573
1,072,330
1,196,575
1,219,611
1,068,811
1,018,468
1,015,762
1,067,733
Collected to date
0
3,017,791
3,301,249
3,713,682
4,112,053
4,079,056
3,651,736
3,473,276
3,466,467
3,667,009
April
0
1,080,745
1,322,070
1,371,030
1,479,603
1,423,459
1,134,552
1,184,137
1,284,180
0
May
519,943
1,263,176
1,159,647
1,392,111
1,353,013
1,243,259
1,098,054
1,102,523
1,187,737
0
June
747,486
1,123,171
1,212,663
1,362,737
1,428,868
1,386,908
1,151,772
1,123,907
1,248,218
0
July
821,741
1,301,359
1,377,753
1,555,124
1,579,586
1,519,846
1,309,401
1,260,873
1,332,834
0
August
1,306,427
1,162,356
1,395,952
1,405,983
1,516,324
1,377,943
1,212,531
1,211,450
1,279,500
0
September
1,390,452
1,160,787
1,372,081
1,487,155
1,546,705
1,364,963
1,227,813
1,191,558
1,294,403
0
October
1,172,591
1,274,680
1,520,176
1,526,910
1,601,038
1,344,217
1,236,493
1,269,505
1,291,217
0
November
963,163
1,091,721
1,095,566
1,369,940
1,443,843
1,292,327
1,155,647
1,139,058
1,217,933
0
December
973,505
1,085,827
1,286,191
1,366,281
1,376,434
1,129,050
1,070,245
1,141,012
1,247,920
0
Total Collections
7,895,308
13,561,613
15,043,348
16,550,953
17,437,467
16,161,028
14,248,244
14,097,299
14,850,409
3,667,009
Budget Estimate
9,100,000
11,000,000
12,280,000
16,002,000
17,466,800
17,115,800
17,860,000
14,410,000
14,210,000
14,210,000
Actual over (under) budg
(1,204,692)
2,561,613
2,763,348
548,953
(29,333)
(954,772)
(3,611,756)
(312,701)
640,409
(10,542,991)
Total actual collections
as a % of total budget 86.76% 123.29% 122.50% 103.43% 99.83% 94.42% 79.78% 97.33% 104.51% nla
% change in annual
total collected nla 71.77% 10.93% 10.02% 5.36% (7.32 %) (11.84 %) (1.06%) 5.34% nla
% of budget collected
through March 0.00% 27.43% 26.88% 23.21% 23.54% 23.83% 20.45% 24.10% 24.39% 25.81%
% of actual total collected
through March 0.00% 22.25% 21.94% 22.44% 23.58% 25.24% 25.63% 24.64% 23.34% nla
Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of March
4!2312012
2012 to 2011
Difference
129,339 8.86%
19,232 1.94%
51,971 5.12%
200,542 5.79%
Page 20
4,500,000
4,000,000
--
3,500,000
-
3,000,000
-
2,500,000
March
■ February
2,000,000
■ January
1A 11
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000
01
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
4!2312012
2012 to 2011
Difference
129,339 8.86%
19,232 1.94%
51,971 5.12%
200,542 5.79%
Page 20
\1SV- FS21UserslmcalhounlTax RevenuelLodging Tax12 0 1 211 0 5 hotel motel tax
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
80,000.00
70,000.00
60,000.00
50,000.00
40,000.00
■March
a February
30,000.00
a January
20,000.00
Hotel /Motel Tax Receipts through -
March
0.00
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Actual for the years 2003 through 2012
60"
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
January
0.00
16,993.58
20,691.03
20,653.49
25,137.92
28,946.96
23,280.21
22,706.96
22,212.21
21,442.32
February
0.00
18,161.04
19,976.81
20,946.09
25,310.66
24,623.06
23,283.95
23,416.94
22,792.14
21,548.82
March
0.00
18,182.01
22,828.15
24,308.48
29,190.35
27,509.99
25,272.02
24,232.35
24,611.28
25,654.64
Collected to date
0.00
53,336.63
63,495.99
65,908.06
79,638.93
81,080.01
71,836.18
70,356.25
69,615.63
68,645.78
April
0.00
26,897.82
29,748.41
34,379.82
37,950.53
40,406.02
36,253.63
39,463.49
38,230.49
0.00
May
11,527.32
16,440.37
29,017.66
32,522.06
31,371.01
36,828.53
32,588.80
34,683.32
33,790.69
0.00
June
32,512.11
53,284.01
35,330.35
34,256.71
36,267.07
46,659.88
40,414,59
39,935.36
41,403.41
0.00
July
38,580.48
42,120.26
43,849.82
49,744.62
56,281.99
50,421.37
43,950.26
47,385.18
49,311.97
0.00
August
54,974.74
43,649.84
46,852.10
45,916.16
51,120.70
50,818.35
50,146.56
54,922.99
57,451.68
0.00
September
30,718.23
39,390.66
46,746.18
50,126.53
57,260.34
60,711.89
50,817.62
59,418.96
58,908.16
0.00
October
36,960.11
33,004.62
34,966.85
38,674.17
43,969.74
38,290.46
36,784.36
41,272.35
39,028.08
0.00
November
23,044.56
32,176.61
26,089.36
36,417.11
36,340.64
35,582.59
34,054.79
34,329.78
37,339.36
0.00
December
28,825.30
23,142.70
31,740.18
29,947.15
31,377.41
26,290.11
27,131.43
26,776.84
32,523.19
0.00
Total Collections
257,142.85
363,443.52
387,828.90
417,084.39
469,578.36
467,089.21
423,978.22
448,544.52
457,602.66
68,645.78
Budget Estimate
419,000.00
380,000.00
436,827.00
350,000.00
400,000.00
400,000.00
512,000.00
380,000.00
480,000.00
430,000.00
Actual over (under) budg
L161,857.15)
(16,556.48)
(48,998.10)
67,084.39
61,578.36
67,089.21
(88,021.78)
68,544.52
(22,397.34)
(361,354.22)
Total actual collections
as a % of total budget 61.37% 95.64% 88.78% 119.17% 115.39% 116.77% 82-81% 118.04% 95.33% nla
% change in annual
total collected nla 41.34% 6.71% 7.54% 10.67% 1.19% (9.23 %) 5.79% 2.02% nla
% of budget collected
through March 0.00% 94.04% 14.54% 18.83% 19.91% 20.27% 14.03% 18.51% 14.50% 15.96%
% of actual total collected
through March 0.00% 14.68% 16.37% 15.80% 17.25% 17.36% 16.94% 15.69% 15.21% nla
Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of March
90,000.00
80,000.00
70,000.00
60,000.00
50,000.00
40,000.00
■March
a February
30,000.00
a January
20,000.00
10,000.00
0.00
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
4/24/2012J
2012 to 2011
Differenoe
(770) (3.47 %)
(1,243) (5.46 %)
1,043 4.24%
(970) (1.39 %)
Page 21
11SV- FS21UserslmcalhounlTax RevenuelREE 82 01 213 01 and 302 REET
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
1st and 2nd 1l4% FLEET Collections through March
Actual for the years 2003 through 2012
700,000.00
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
January
0.00
119,387.05
147,819.56
232,894.16
228,896.76
145,963.47
55,281.25
59,887-08
63,704.64
46,358.75
February
0.00
83,795.78
128,082.35
172,154.72
129,919.79
159,503.34
45,180.53
64,121.61
36,443.36
56,114.86
March
0.00
195,121.93
198,013.09
182,065.71
263,834.60
132,429.60
73,306.86
86,204.41
95,385.38
71,729.67
0.00
398,304.76
473,915.00
587,114.59
622,651.15
437,896.41
173,768.64
210,213.10
195,533.38
174,203.28
April
112,721.05
144,167.21
192,012.44
173,796.61
211,787.08
128,366.69
81,155.83
99,507.19
79,681.38
0.00
May
136,982.04
155,089.15
240,765.59
306,871.66
222,677.17
158,506.43
77,463.58
109,190.51
124,691.60
0.00
June
159,923.98
177,702.06
284,268.67
226,526 -64
257,477.05
164,771.48
105,020.98
105,680.28
81,579.34
0.00
July
156,636.66
197,046.43
209,350.53
2,104.30
323,945.47
217,942.98
122,530.36
80,790.14
79,629.06
0.00
August
198,506.47
171,521.07
258,631.50
451,700.06
208,039.87
132,909.28
115,829.68
72,630.27
129,472.44
0.00
September
190,932.75
176,002.43
214,738.94
188,066.23
153,037.21
131,240.36
93,862.17
75,812.10
68,019.83
0.00
October
155,243.97
199,685.81
244,590.31
211,091.20
206,442.92
355,655.60
113,960.52
82,733.97
61,396.23
0.00
November
115,054.43
151,219.02
190,964.73
139,979.09
191,805.53
147,875.00
132,881.49
72,021.24
73,976.83
0.00
December
111,788.66
173,502.55
159,381.40
161,285.23
179,567.77
96,086.00
71,365.60
60,871.34
65,077.29
0.00
Total distributed by Spokane County
1,337,790.01
1,944,240.49
2,468,619.11
2,448,535.61
2,577,431.22
1,971,250.23
1,087,838.85
969,450.14
958,257.38
174,203.28
Budget estimate
1,127,112.00
1,680,000.00
4,006,361.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000.000.00
760,000.00
800,000.00
950,000.00
Actual over (under) budget
210,678.01
264,240.49
(1,537,741.89)
448,535.61
577,431.22
(28,749.77)_5912,161.95)
209,450.14
158,257.38
(775,796.72)
Total actual collections
as a % of total budget
118.69%
115.73%
61.62%
122.43%
128.87%
98.56%
54.39%
127.56%
119.78%
n/a
% change in annual
total collected
nla
45.33%
26.97%
(0.81%)
5.26%
_(23.52 %)
(44.81%)
(10.88 %)
(1.15%)
n/a
% of budget collected
through March
0.00%
23.71%
11.83%
29.36%
31.13%
21.89%
8.69%
27.660/6
24.44%
18.34%
% of actual total collected
through March
0.00%
20.49%
19.20%
23.98%
24.16%
22.21%
15.97%
21.68%
20.41%
n/a
Chart Reflecting History of Collections
through the Month
of
March
700,000.00
600,000.00
i
500,000.00
400,000.00^
=March
300,000.00
■ February
■ lanuary
200,000.00
100,000.00
0.00
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
4!1312012
2012 to 2011
Difference
(17,346) (27.23 %)
19,672 53.98%
(23,656) (24.80 %)
(21,330) 91 1°
Page 22
\\SV- FS2\Users\mcalhoun\Bonds\ debt capacity
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Debt Capacity
2011 Assessed Value for 2012 Property Taxes 7,087
312 212 0 1 2
Maximum Outstanding Remaining
Debt as of Debt %
Capacity 12/31/2011 Capacity Utilized
Voted (UTGO)
1.00% of assessed value
70,875,234
0
70,875,234
0.00%
Nonvoted (LTGO)
1.50% of assessed value
106,312,851
7,930,000
98,382,851
7.46%
Voted park
2.50% of assessed value
177,188,085
0
177,188,085
0.00%
Voted utility
2.50% of assessed value
177,188,085
0
177,188,085
0.00%
12/1/2010
110,000
531,564,255
7,930,000
523,634,255
1.49%
Bonds
Repaid
Bonds
Remaining
2003 LTGO Bonds
60,000
85,0 0
Road &
12/1/2005
Period
90,0
Street
12/1/2006
Ending
CenterPlace
Improvemen s
Total
12/1/2004
60,000
85,0 0
145,000
12/1/2005
75,000
90,0
165,000
12/1/2006
85,000
90,00
175,000
12/1/2007
90,000
95,00
185,000
12/1/2008
95,000
95,00
190,000
12/1/2009
105,000
100,00
205,000
12/1/2010
110,000
100,000
210,000
12/1/2011
120,000
105,000
225,000
12/1/2020
740,000
760,000
1,500,000
12/1/2012
130,000
110,100
240,000
12/1/2013
140,000
115,000
255,000
12/1/2014
150,000
120,000
270,000
12/1/2015
160,000
125,000
285,000
12/1/2016
170,000
130,000
300,000
12/1/2017
180,000
135,000
315,000
12/1/2018
220,000
140,000
360,000
12/1/2019
250,000
145,000
395,000
12/1/2020
290,000
150,000
440,000
12/1/2021
325,000
160,000
485,000
12/1/2022
360,000
165,000
525,000
12/1/2023
405,000
175,000
580,000
12/1/2024
450,000
0
450,000
12/1/2025
490,000
0
490,000
12/1/2026
535,000
0
535,000
12/1/2027
430,000
0
430,000
12/1/2028
340,000
0
340,000
12/1/2029
295,000
0
295,000
12/1/2030
280,000
0
280,000
12/1/2031
240,000
0
240,000
12/1/2032
190,000
0
190,000
12/1/2033
230,000
0
230,000
7,000,000 2,430,000 9,430,000
Page 23