2012, 08-14 Regular MeetingAGENDA
SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
FORMAL FORMAT MEETING
Tuesday, August 14, 2012 6:00 p.m.
Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers
11707 E Sprague Avenue
Council Requests Please Silence Your Cell Phones During Council Meeting
CALL TO ORDER:
INVOCATION: Pastor Mike Graef, Valley United Methodist Church
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
ROLL CALL:
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS:
COMMITTEE, BOARD, LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS:
MAYOR'S REPORT:
PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those on
this agenda as action items. (Action items include public hearings, and those items under NEW
BUSINESS. Public Comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.) When
you come to the podium, please state your name and address for the record and limit remarks to three
minutes.
1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any
member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered
separately.
a. Approval of the following claim vouchers:
VOUCHER LIST DATE
VOUCHER NUMBERS;
TOTAL AMOUNT
07 -20 -2012
3998 -4001; 26568
$59,625.73
07 -20 -2012
26457 -26567
$960,173.36
08 -01 -2012
26569- 26634; 9667202; 731120025
$1,651,017.25
08 -01 -2012
26635 -26639
$125.00
08 -02 -2012
26640
$5,575.06
08 -07 -2012
4018 -4021; 4038; 26641 -26645
$233,719.71
08 -07 -2012
5450 -5477
$2,919.00
GRAND TOTAL
$2,913,155.11
b. Approval of Payroll for period ending July 31, 2012: $390,287.29
c. Approval of Minutes of July 24, 2012 Special Council Meeting
d. Approval of Minutes of July 24, 2012 Regular, Formal Council Meeting
e. Approval of Minutes of July 31, 2012 Study Session Meeting
NEW BUSINESS:
2. Proposed Resolution 12 -004 Accepting Shoreline Master Program Goals and Policies — Lori Barlow
[public comment]
3. Motion Consideration: Settlement Agreement on Law Enforcement/Jail Interlocals — Kelly Konkright
[public comment]
Council Agenda 08 -14 -12 Formal Format Meeting Page 1 of 2
PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those on
this agenda as action items. (Action items include public hearings, and those items under NEW
BUSINESS. Public Comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.) When
you come to the podium, please state your name and address for the record and limit remarks to three
minutes.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS:
4. Library District Update — Executive Director Nancy Ledeboer, and Board Chair Tim Hattenburg
5. Calendar Year 2013 Budget — Mark Calhoun
6. Advance Agenda — Mayor Towey
INFORMATION ONLY (will not be reported or discussed):
7. Department Quarterly Reports
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
8. EXECUTIVE SESSION: [RCW 42.30.110(1)(g)]
Review Performance of Public Employee
ADJOURNMENT
General Meeting Schedule (meeting schedule is always subject to change)
Regular Council meetings are generally held every Tuesday beginning at 6:00 p.m.
The Formal meeting formats are en�erally held the 2nd and e Tuesday Formal meeting have time
allocated for general public comments as well as comments after each action item.
The Study Session formats (the less formal meeting) held the 1St. 3rd and 5d' Tuesday
Study Session formats DO NOT have time allocated for general public comments; but if action items are
included, comments are permitted after those specific action items.
NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate
physical, hearing, or other impairments, please contact the City Clerk at (509) 921 -1000 as soon as
possible so that arrangements may be made.
Council Agenda 08 -14 -12 Formal Format Meeting Page 2 of 2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: August 14, 2012 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Following Vouchers:
VOUCHER LIST DATE
VOUCHER NUMBERS;
TOTAL AMOUNT
07 -20 -2012
3998 -4001; 26568
$59,625.73
07 -20 -2012
26457 -26567
$960,173.36
08 -01 -2012
26569- 26634; 9667202; 731120025
$1,651,017.25
08 -01 -2012
26635-26639
$125.00
08 -02 -2012
26640
$5,575.06
08 -07 -2012
4018 -4021; 4038; 26641 -26645
$233,719.71
08 -07 -2012
5450 -5477
$2,919.00
001.058.056.558.
GRAND TOTAL
$2,913,155.11
)und on Voucher Lists
Other Funds
101 — Street Fund
103 — Paths & Trails
105 — Hotel /Motel Tax
120 — CenterPlace Operating Reserve
121 — Service Level Stabilization Reserve
122 — Winter Weather Reserve
123 — Civic Facilities Replacement
204 -- Debt Service
301 —Capital Projects (J." %4% REET)
302 — Special Capital Proj (2 "d'/4% REET)
303 -- Street Capital Projects
304 — Mirabeau Point Project
307 — Capital Grants
309 — Parks Capital Grants
310 — Civic Bldg Capital Projects
311 -- Street Capital improvements 2011 f
402 — Storinwater Management
403 -- Aquifer Protection Area
501 — Equipment Rental & Replacement
502 — Risk Management
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Approve claims for vouchers as listed above.
STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun, Finance Director
ATTACHMENTS: Voucher Lists
Explanation of Fund Numbers f
#001- General Fund
001.011.000.511
City Council
001 .013.000.513.
City Manager
001.013.015.515.
Legal
001.016.000.
Public Safety
001.018.013.513.
Deputy City Manager
001.018.014.514.
Finance
001.018.016.516.
Human Resources
001.032.000.
Public Works
001.058.050.558.
Comm. Develop.- Administration
001.058.055.559.
Comm. Develop.— Develop.Eng.
001.058.056.558.
Community Develop.- Planning
001.058.057.559.
Community Develop.- Building
001.076.000.576.
Parks & Rec-- Administration
001.076.300.576.
Parks & Ree- Maintenance
001.076.301.574.
Parks & Rec- Recreation
001.076.302.576.
Parks & Rec- Aquatics
001.076304.575.
Parks & Rec- Senior Center
001.076.305.574.
Parks & Rec - CenterPlace
001.090.000.511.
General Gov't- Council related
001.090.000.514.
General Gov't - Finance related
001.090.000.517.
General Gov't - Employee supply
001.090.000.518.
General,Gov't- Centralized Services
001.090.000.519.
General Gov't -Other Services
001.090.000,531.
General Gov't - Natural Resources
001.090.000.550.
General Gov't - Economic Dev.
001-090.000.560.
General Gov't - Social Services
001.090.000.594.
General Gov't- Capital Outlay
)und on Voucher Lists
Other Funds
101 — Street Fund
103 — Paths & Trails
105 — Hotel /Motel Tax
120 — CenterPlace Operating Reserve
121 — Service Level Stabilization Reserve
122 — Winter Weather Reserve
123 — Civic Facilities Replacement
204 -- Debt Service
301 —Capital Projects (J." %4% REET)
302 — Special Capital Proj (2 "d'/4% REET)
303 -- Street Capital Projects
304 — Mirabeau Point Project
307 — Capital Grants
309 — Parks Capital Grants
310 — Civic Bldg Capital Projects
311 -- Street Capital improvements 2011 f
402 — Storinwater Management
403 -- Aquifer Protection Area
501 — Equipment Rental & Replacement
502 — Risk Management
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Approve claims for vouchers as listed above.
STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun, Finance Director
ATTACHMENTS: Voucher Lists
vchlist
Voucher List
Page: 1
07/20/2012
2:45:32PM
Spokane Valley
Bank code :
apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
FundlDept
Description /Account
Amount
3998
7/20/2012 000048 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS, 401A PLAN
Ben44665
001.231.14.00
401A: Payment
20,665.99
Total:
20,665.99
3999
7/20/2012 000682 EFTPS
Ben44667
001.231.11.00
FEDERAL TAXES: Payment
29,600.11
Total:
29,600.11
4000
7/20/2012 000145 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS, 457 PLf Ben44669
001.231.18.00
457 DEFERRED COMPENSATION: Payr
6,623.30
Total :
6,623.30
4001
7/20/2012 000162 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS, 401A EXEC PL Ben44671
001.231.14.00
401 EXEC PLAN: Payment
1,052.33
Total:
1,052.33
26568
7/20/2012 001363 AUTOMATED ACCOUNTS INC
Ben44663
001.231.20,00
BERG 11130927 -A: Payment
1,684.00
Total:
1,684.00
5 Vouchers for bank code : apbank
Bank total:
59,625.73
5 Vouchers in this report
Total
vouchers:
59,625.73
I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury,
that the materials have been furnished, the services
rendered, or the labor performed as described herein
and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid
obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that
I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim.
Finance Director Date
Mayor
Council Member
Date
Date
Page: 1
vchlist
Voucher List
Page: 1
07/2012012
11:46:26AM
Spokane Valley
Bank code :
apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
Fund /Dept
Description /Account
Amount
26457
7/20/2012 000921 ATO,Z RENTALS
98078 -1
001.076.305.575
CHAIR RENTALS
230.44
Total :
230.44
26458
7/20/2012 000958 AAA SWEEPING, LLC
48108 -A
402.402.000.538
JUNE 2012 STORM DRAIN CLEAN[[
32,402.59
Total :
32,402.59
26459
7/20/2012 000150 ALLIED FIRE & SECURITY
JC1009930
001.076.305.575
INSTALLATION OF SECURITY SOF-
2,012.76
Total :
2,012.76
26460
7/20/2012 001081 ALSCO
LSPOI160188
001.016.000.521
FLOOR MATS: PRECINCT
21.91
LSPOI167059
001.01 &000.521
Floor Mats for Precinct Bldg - June
20.39
LSPOI173537
001.058.057.559
FLOOR MATS: BLG DEPT
39.55
PSPOI173773
001.016.000.521
Fl000r Mats for Precinct - July
22.51
Total :
104.36
26461
7/20/2012 001715 AMERICAN RED CROSS
11008693
001.076.301.574
TRAINING ON 6118
780.00
Total :
780.00
26462
7/20/2012 003076 AMSDEN, ERICA
Expenses
001.032.000.543
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
23.88
Total :
23.88
26463
7/20/2012 002019 ATD- AMERICAN CO.
13099740
001.076.304.575
TABLES, 30 "X72"
1,03000
Total :
1,030.00
26464
7/20/2012 000030 AVISTA
June 2012
001.076.300.576
UTILITIES: PARKS MASTER AVISTA
13,988.75
Total :
13,988.75
26465
7/20/2012 000694 AVISTA UTILITIES
37913
001.090.000.519
HOME ENERGYAUDITS - JUNE 20'
2,805.00
Total :
2,805.00
26466
7/20/2012 001606 BANNER BANK
4064
001.058.056.558
MAY 2012:4064
2,585.94
Total :
2,585.94
26467
7/20/2012 001816 BENTHIN & ASSOCIATES
1907
402.402.000.538
PINES /ALKAI -OLIVE SURVEYING S
2,080.00
Total :
2,080.00
26468
7/20/2012 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC
9343586
001.076.305.575
LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLYAT C
38.65
Page: 1
vchlist Voucher List Page: 2
07120/2012 11:46.26AM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
26468
7/20/2012 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC
(Continued)
000143 CITY OF SPOKANE
June 2012
9345559
001.076.305.575
LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT C
S0034387
001.076.305.575
LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLYAT C
S0035206
Total :
S0035239
26469
7/20/2012 002562 CD'A METALS
480202
26470
7/20/2012 002226 CENTRAL PREMIX
13- 1708146
26471
7/20/2012 000322 CENTURYLINK
July 2012
26472
7/20/2012 000729 CH2MHILL INC
3834038
26473 7/20/2012 002572 CINTAS CORPORATOIN 606715286
606716229
606717155
606717199
606718097
26474
7/20/2012
000143 CITY OF SPOKANE
June 2012
26475
7/20/2012
000143 CITY OF SPOKANE
June 2012
26476
26477
7/20/2012 003054 COMMUNICATIONS SUPPLY CORP 134307
712012012 000508 CONOCOPHILLIPS FLEET 28458637
Fund /Dept
Description/Account
Amount
001.076.305.575
LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT C
37.08
001.076.305.575
LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLYAT C
68.75
001.076.305.575
LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT C
140.76
001.076.305.575
LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLYAT C
330.01
Total :
615.25
101.000.000.542
SUPPLIES: PW
50.55
Total :
50.55
101.042,000.542
GRAVEL
45.85
Total :
45.85
001,076.302.576
JULY 2012: PHONE SERVICE
230.28
Total :
230.28
303.303.155.595
0155 - SULLIVAN RD W BRIDGE SL
43,013.23
Total :
43,013.23
101.000.000.542
SUPPLIES: PW
119.82
101.000.000.542
SUPPLIES: PW
119.82
101.000.000.542
SUPPLIES: PW
119.82
101.042.000.543
SUPPLIES: PW
160.53
101.000.000.542
SUPPLIES: PW
247.58
Total :
767.57
001.000.000.342
REFUND OF FALSE ALARM PAYME
365.00
Total :
365.00
402.402.000.538
TRANSFER STATION: PW
51,47
Total :
51.47
303.303.061.595
0061 FIBER OPTIC CABLE PURCHI
2,838.65
Total :
2,838.65
001.058.057.559
JUNE 2012: FLEET FUEL BILL
3,242.63
Total :
3,242.63
Page: 2
vchlist
Voucher List
Page:
3
0712012012
11:46:26AM
Spokane Valley
Bank code :
apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
Fund/Dept
Description /Account
Amount
26478
7/2012012 001157 COUNTRY HOMES POWER EQUIP
96094
101.042.000.542
SUPPLIES: PW
121.11
96513
101.042,000.542
SUPPLIES: PW
111.44
Total :
232.55
26479
7/20/2012 000683 DAVID EVANS & ASSOCIATES
319628
001.058.055.559
SPOKANE VALLEY PLAT REVIEW
1,635.00
319923
101.042.000.542
2012 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERI
5,328.05
320363
001.058.055.559
SPOKANE VALLEY PLAT REVIEW
1,055.80
Total :
8,018.85
26480
7/20/2012 000425 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS
59899
101.042.000.542
TOWER RENTAL
200.00
Total :
200.00
26481
7/20/2012 003083 DEBOISE, BRITfANI
Expenses
001.076.305.575
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
31.90
Total :
31.90
26482
7/20/2012 002604 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC
75893587
001.090.000.548
LEASE CONTRACT
1,087.47
Total :
1,087.47
26483
7/20/2012 000912 DEX MEDIA WEST
July 2012
001.076.304.575
Advertising Senior Center
39.55
Total :
39.55
26484
7/20/2012 002389 DIRECTPOS
14205
001.076.302.576
SERVICE AT PARK ROAD POOL
88.05
'total :
88.05
26485
7/20/2012 001043 ESRI
92506311
402.402.000.538
ARCPAD MAINTENANCE: PW
271.75
Total :
271.75
26486
7/20/2012 003088 >=EGLEY, 1NEZ
Refund
001.076.302.347
AQUATICS REFUND
30.00
Total :
30.00
26487
7/20/2012 001750 FIRST TRANSIT, INC
10697304
001.076.301.574
TRANSPORTATION FOR DAY CAMF
556.50
Total:
556 -50
26488
7/20/2012 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC
104191
001.058.056.558
ADVERTISING FOR PLANNING
103.50
Total :
103.50
26489
7/2012012 001253 GORDON THOMAS HONEYWELL
Jun 121042
001.011.000,511
LOBBYIST SERVICES
3,174.43
Page: 3
vchlist
07/2012012
11:46:26AM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page:
4
Bank code:
apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
Fund /Dept
Description /Account
Amount
26489
7/20/2012 001253 001253 GORDON THOMAS HONEYWELL (Continued)
Total :
3,174.43
26490
7/20/2012 003085 GOVERNMENTAL ACCOUNTING, STAND, 01210579
009.018.094.514
GASB SUBSCRIPTION: ACCT #538,
225.00
Total :
225.00
26491
7/20/2012 000007 GRAINGER
9863789542
101.042.000.542
SUPPLIES: PW
545.94
9863789559
101.042.000.542
SUPPLIES: PW
264.19
Total :
810.13
26492
7/20/2012 002271 GRASSEL, BRENDA
Expenses
001.011.000.511
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
405.16
Total :
405.16
26493
7/20/2012 000321 GREATER SPOKANE INC
85710
001.011.000.511
REGISTRATION FOR GARY SCHIMI
300.00
85723
001.011.000.511
REGISTRATION FOR TOM TOWEY
40.00
Total :
340.00
26494
7/20/2012 002712 GTFX INC.
25708
001.076.305.575
SERVICE GREASE TRAP
109.79
Total :
109.79
26495
7/20/2012 003057 HAGADONE DIRECTORIES INC
509 -688 -0300 -0000
001.076.305.575
ADVERTISING: CP
913.14
Total :
913.14
26496
7/20/2012 003084 HIDDEN RIVERS, IRRIGATION & LANDS( June 2012
309.309.079.594
MATERIALS - SOD - GREENACRES
3,375.14
Total :
3,375.14
26497
7/20/2012 000161 IIMC
July 2012
001.013.000.513
ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP: BAINBRID(
250.00
Total :
250.00
26498
7/20/2012 002518 INLAND PACIFIC HOSE & FITINGS
474707
101.042.000.542
SUPPLIES: PW
164.29
474726
101.042 .000.542
SUPPLIES: PW
319.23
474899
101.042.000.542
SUPPLIES FOR PW
27.44
475284
101.042.000.542
SUPPLIES: PW
328.71
475290
101.042.000.542
SUPPLIES: PW
11.89
475307
101.042.000.542
SUPPLIES PW
110.98
Total :
962.54
26499
7/20/2012 000070 INLAND POWER & LIGHT CO
94202
101.042.000.542
UTILITIES:JUNE 2012 PW
394.04
Page: 4
vchlist Voucher List Page:
0712012012 11:46:26AM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
26499 7/20/2012 000070 000070 INLAND POWER & LIGHT CO (Continued)
26500 7/20/2012 000388 IRVIN WATER DIST. #6 June 2012
June 2012
26501 7/20/2012 001635 1SS FACILITY /EVENT SERVICES 363032
367721
376575
26502 7/20/2012 002466 KENWORTH SALES 116035
26503
7/20/2012 002522 KOEGEN EDWARDS LLP
2187
Total :
2188
26504
7/20/2012 001944 LANCER LTD
0428316
101.042.000.542
UTILITIES: PW
0428318
26505
7/20/2012 001684 MARKETING SOLUTIONS NW
CP 7- 132012 Media
26506
7/20/2012 002259 MENKE JACKSON BEYER EHIL.S
439
001.076.305.575
EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLA(
470
26507
7/20/2012 000132 MODERN ELECTRIC WATER CO
17967418
Total:
June 2012
26508
7/20/2012 000662 NAIL BARRICADE & SIGN CO
76578
Total :
76625
26509 7/20/2012 001035 NETWORK DESIGN & MANAGEMENT 3403
Fund /Dept
Description /Account
Amount
Total :
394.04
001.076300.576
UTILITIES: PARKS
998.75
101.042.000.542
UTILITIES: PW
164.02
Total :
1,162.77
001.076.305.575
EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLA(
68.96
001.076.305.575
EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLA(
212.76
001.076.305.575
EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLA(
89.50
Total:
371.22
101.042.000.542
SUPPLIES: PW
165.22
Total :
165.22
001.013.015.515
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: LUPA
280.40
001,013.015.515
PROFESSIONAL SVCS: GENERAL
426.50
Total :
706.90
001.032.000.543
BUSINESS CARDS: ANDERSON
44.02
001.058.055,559
BUSINESS CARDS: MAY, AMSDEN,
108.98
Total :
15100
001.076.304.575
ADVERTISING FOR CENTERPLACE
967.00
Total :
967.00
001.013.015.515
PROF SVCS: HOLLYWOOD EROTIC
1,309.92
001.013.015.515
PROF SVCS: AT &T MOBILE TAX RE
494.88
Total :
1,804.80
101.042.000.542
UTILITIES: PW NOT ON MASTER &
23.14
101.042.000.542
UTILITIES'. PW JUNE 2012
8,644.75
Total :
8,667.89
001.032.000.543
SUPPLIES FOR PW
61.96
001.032.000.543
SUPPLIES FOR PW
268.00
Total :
329.96
001.090.000.518 SYSTEM MONTHLY MAINTENANCE: 6,378.75
Page: 5
vchlist
Voucher List
Page: 6
07/20/2012
11:46:26AM
Spokane Valley
Bank code:
apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
invoice
Fund /Dept
Description/Account
Amount
26509
7/20/2012 001035 001035 NETWORK DESIGN & MANAGEMEN (Continued)
Total :
6,378.75
26510
7/20/2012 003086 NEVILLS, CAPRI
Refund
001.076.302.347
AQUATICS REFUND
30.00
Total :
30.00
26511
7/20/2012 002364 NORTHEND TRUCK EQUIPMENT INC
1026836
101.042.000.542
TRUCK PARTS
1,220.33
Total :
1,220.33
26512
7/20/2012 001233 NORTHWEST FENCE COMPANY
0018807 -IN
001.016.000.521
Chain Link Fence - Precinct
982.43
Total :
982.43
26513
7/20/2012 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC.
615349594001
001.032.000.543
Supplies: PW
30.83
Total :
30.83
26514
7/20/2012 000058 OMA
June 2012
001.018.016.516
PHYSICAL EXAMS: NEW EMPLOYE
260.00
Total :
260.00
26515
7/20/2012 002243 ORBITCOM
00582370
001. 090.000.518
ETHERNET: JULY 2012
590.00
Total :
590.00
26516
7/20/2012 000881 OXARC
R138340
101.042.000.542
SUPPLIES.-PW
88.05
Total :
88.05
26517
7/20/2012 003087 PADILLO, VANESSA
Refund
001.076.302.347
AQUATICS REFUND
30.00
Total :
30.00
26518
7/20/2012 001860 PLATT
1754051
101.042.000.542
SUPPLIES PW
2,362.90
Total :
2,362.90
26519
7/20/2012 000119 PLESE PRINTING
1330051534
001.076.302.576
SWIMMING LESSON REGISTRATIC
473.44
Total :
473.44
26520
7/20/2012 001089 POE ASPHALT PAVING, INC.
June 2012
101.042.000.542
2012 STREETAND STORMWATER
99,568.43
Total :
99,568.43
26521
7/20/2012 000019 PURRFECT LOGOS, INC.
29601
001.032.000.543
CAR MAGNETS WITH CITY LOGO
171.75
29630
001.076.301.574
BANNERS FOR PARKS /REC
54.35
Total :
226.10
Page: 6
vchlist Voucher List Page: 7
07/20/2012 11:46:26AM Spokane Valley
Sank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description /Account Amount
26522 7/20/2012 000675 RAMAX PRINTING & AWARDS 22973 001.058.056.558 PRINTING ON CLOCK 77.18
Page: 7
Total :
77.18
26523
7/20/2012 002952 RAMEL, SIMONE
May 2012
001.016.000.521
REIMBURSEMENT FOR JAG GRAN
409.56
Total :
409.56
26524
7/20/2012 000415 ROSAUERS
641938
001.076.301.574
SUPPLIES FOR REC PROGRAMS
12.36
July 2012
001.076.305.575
SUPPLIES FOR CP
70.55
July 2012
001.076.301.574
SUPPLIES FOR REC PROGRAMS
9.76
Total :
92.67
26525
7/20/2012 0000644 SCHIMMELS, GARY
Expenses
001.011.000.511
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
100.12
Total :
100.12
26526
7/20/2012 000709 SENSKE LAWN & TREE CARE INC.
4318693
001.076.300.576
CONTRACT MAINT: JUNE 2012
54,123.81
4524992
101.042.000.542
2012 EMERGENCY TRAFFIC CONT
542.71
5084384
001.016.000.521
CONTRACT MA1NT: JUNE 2012 PRE
1,055.26
Total :
55,721.78
26527
7/20/2012 000935 SERVICE PAPER CO
110709975
001.016.000.521
SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE/PR
1,404.48
110710621
001.076.305.575
SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE../PR
1,583.73
Total :
2,988.21
26528
7/20/2012 000318 SHAMROCK MANUFACTURING
Pay app 1
303.303.160.595
EVERGREEN ROAD CONSTRUCTI(
291,856.33
Total:
291,856.33
26529
7/20/2012 002947 SILVER MOUNTAIN CORP
450002
001.076.301.574
SUMMER DAY CAMP FIELD TRIP
1,272.00
Total :
1,272.00
26530
7/20/2012 000779 SOUTHARD, BRAD
June 2012
101.042.000.542
2012 DEAD ANIMAL REMOVAL
600.00
Total :
600.00
26531
7/20/2012 000230 SPOKANE CO AUDITORS OFFICE
June 2012
001.058.056.558
RECORDING FEES
488.00
Total :
488.00
26532
7/20/2012 000172 SPOKANE CO ENGINEER
VLY1206
101.042.000.542
COUNTY SERVICES
101,415.86
Total :
101,415.86
Page: 7
vchlist
Voucher List
Page: 8
07/20/2012
11:46:26AM
Spokane Valley
Bank code :
apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
Fund/Dept
Description /Account
Amount
26533
7/20/2012 002679 SPOKANE CO OFFICE OF FINANCIAL
July 2012
001.016.000.598
SCSO 2012 SEAT BELT EMPHASIS
1,783.13
Total :
1,783.13
26534
7/20/2012 000658 SPOKANE CO SUPERIOR COURT
July 17 2012
001.013.015.515
FILE COMPLAINT: 3550.185
240.00
Total :
240.00
26535
7/20/2012 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER
51501213
001.016.000.523
JUNE 2012 HOUSING INVOICE
97,739.00
51501240
402.402.000.538
JUNE 2012 WORK CREW
6,409.33
Total :
104,148.33
26536
7/20/2012 000323 SPOKANE CO UTILITIES
July 2012
001.076.302.576
SEWER CHARGES FOR JULY 2012
1,459.89
Total :
1,459.89
26537
7/20/2012 002835 SPOKANE COURIER SERVICES LLC
2515
001.011.000.511
BROADCASTING SVCS
100.00
2622
001.011.000.511
BROADCASTING SVCS
40.00
Total :
140.00
26538
7/20/2012 002540 SPOKANE HOUSE OF HOSE INC.
218722
101.042.000.542
SUPPLIES PW
65.22
Total :
65.22
26539
7/20/2012 001903 SPOKANE TRAFFIC CONTROL
612 -1
101.042.000.542
Maint - University 6116 -23112
3,392.50
612 -2
101.042.000.542
Maint - University 6124 -30/12
1,863.00
Total :
5,255.50
26540
7/20/2012 000093 SPOKESMAN- REVIEW
320326
001.011.000.511
ADVERTISING: OUTSIDE AG ENCY
1,297.84
Total :
1,297.84
26541
7/20/2012 000273 SRTC
TS -1705
001.032.000.543
SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE
1,548.98
Total :
1,548.98
26542
7/20/2012 001083 STANDARD PLBG HEATING CONTROLS
31149
001.016.000.521
JUNE 2012 MONTHLY MA1NT PREC
553.60
31150
001.076.305.575
ANNUAL MAINTENANCE CONTRAC
7,443.61
31198
001.076.305.575
GLYCOL DELIVERED
274.79
Total :
8,272.00
26543
7/20/2012 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE
3177566975
001.058.057.559
OFFICE SUPPLIES
63.24
3177566976
001.058.057.559
OFFICE SUPPLIES
71.45
Page: 8
vchlist
Voucher List
Page: 9
07120/2012
11:46:26AM
Spokane Valley
Bank code:
apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
Fund /Dept
Description /Account
Amount
26543
7/20/2012 000065 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE
(Continued)
Total :
134.69
26544
7/20/2012 003079 SVR DESIGN CENTER
10348
001.032.000.543
APP LEWAY TRAIL -# 12 -025
11,500.00
Total :
11,500.00
26545
7/20/2012 002110 TARGET MEDIA N.W. PUBLISHING
43514
001.018.013.513
PRINTING: HOTTOPIC
834.09
Total :
834.09
26546
7/20/2012 001895 TAYLOR ENGINEERING INC
2 -Task No A
303.303.146.595
0146 - ON CALL ENG, DES, AUTOC.
351.32
Total:
351.32
26547
7/20/2012 002306 TERRELL, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, MIC 820
310.000.164.594
COSV SIGN DEVELOPMENT
590.00
Total :
590.00
26548
7/20/2012 001472 TESTAMERICA LAB
59005023
001.076.300.576
ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING: PARK;
27.00
Total:
27.00
26549
7/20/2012 001911 THE GLOVER MANSION
CP605
001.076.305.575
EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLA(
133.70
CP606
001.076.305.575
EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLA(
152.18
Total :
285.88
26550
7/20/2012 000335 TIRE -RAMA
8080017591
402.402.000.538
47366D: OIL CHANGE AND AIR FILI
66.81
Total :
66.81
26551
7/20/2012 002597 TWISTED PAIR ENTERPRIZES L.L.0
6282012
001.011.000.511
BROADCASTING COUNCIL MTGS J
1,239.18
Total :
1,239.18
26552
7/20/2012 002059 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
July 2012
311.000.162.541
APPLICATION FEE FOR TEMP USE
595.00
Total :
595.00
26553
7/20/2092 000337 UPS
Y3F950262
001.090.000.518
FEES FOR POSTAGE
14.37
Total :
14.37
26554
7/20/2012 002988 VALLEY BEST -WAY BLDG SUPPLY
608198
001.032.000.543
suppliesPW
8.69
608285
001.032.000.543
SUPPLIES PW
10.10
608386
001.032.000.543
SUPPLIES PW
4.98
Total :
23.77
Page: 9
vchlist
Voucher List
Page: 10
0712012012
11:46:26AM
Spokane Valley
Bank code:
apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
Fund /Dept
Description /Account
Amount
26555
7/20/2012 000295 VALLEYFEST
415
001.076.305.575
ADVERTISING IN VALLEYFEST PUI
1,515.00
Total :
9,515.00
26556
7/20/2012 003000 VAN NESS FELDMAN
97020
001.058.056.558
PROFESSIONAL SVCS: SNIP UPDA
3,755.17
Total :
3,755.17
26557
7/20/2012 002909 WA DEPT OF ENTERPRISE SERVICES
71 -1 -254
001.058.055.559
ARCGIS DESKTOP III WORKFLOW
945.00
Total :
945.00
26558
7/20/2012 002909 WA DEPT OF ENTERPRISE SERVICES
71 -1 -77
001.058.055.559
ARCGIS DESKTOP 11 - HENRYALLE
925.00
Total :
925.00
26559
7/20/2012 002909 WA DEPT OF ENTERPRISE SERVICES
2012060063
001.032.000.543
Technology Brokering services June<
734.30
Total :
734.30
26560
7/20/2012 000140 WAITS MAILING SERVICE
33391
303.303.115.595
SPRAGUE RECONSTRUCTION PR(
1,295.32
Total :
1,295.32
26561
7/20/2012 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE
0055580- 1518 -5
402.402.000.538
WASTE MGMT: JUNE 2012
2,563.01
1514060- 2681 -6
101.042.000.543
WASTE MGMT: MAINTENANCE FA(
178.12
Total:
2,741.13
26562
7/20/2012 000676 WEST
825240278
001.013.015.515
SUBSCRIPTION: LEGAL
696.29
Total:
696.29
26563
7/20/2012 003018 WESTERN CONCRETE PRODUCTS
0022818 -IN
101.042.000.542
SUPPLIES FOR PW
161.97
Total :
161.97
26564
7/20/2012 002839 WIND WIRELESS INC.
74877
101.042.000.542
WIRELESS TELEPHONE/[NTERNEI
84.95
Total :
84.95
26565
7/20/2012 001409 WORLD CLASS COMMUNICATIONS
120700035
001.076.305.575
ANSWERING SVCS: CENTERPLAC
22.75
Total :
22.75
26566
7/20/2012 003002 XO COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES
0251927556
001.076.305.575
JULY 2012 INTERNET /DATA LINES
448.06
Total :
448.06
26567
7/20/2092 000487 YMCA OF THE INLAND NW
Jan-June 2012
001.076.302.576
JAN - JUNE 2012 OPERATION AND
94,500.00
Page: 10
vchlist Voucher List Page: 11
07120/2012 11:46:26AM Spokane Valley
Sank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor
26567 7120/2012 000487 000487 YMCA OF THE INLAND NW
111 Vouchers for bank code: apbank
111 Vouchers in this report
1, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury,
that the materials have been furnished, the services
rendered, or the labor performed as described herein
and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid
obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that
I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim.
Finance Director Date
Mayor
Date
Council Member Date
Invoice Fund/Dept Description /Account Amount
(Continued) Total : 94,500.00
Bank total : 960,173.36
Total vouchers: 960,173.36
Page: 11
vchlist
Voucher List
Page: 1
08/01/2012
12:04:40PM
Spokane Valley
Bank code:
apbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
Fund /Dept
Description /Account
Amount
26569
8/1/2012
000958 AAA SWEEPING, LLC
48107
402.402.000.538
2012 STREET SWEEPING SERVICE
33 ,758.05
Total :
33,758.05
26570
8/1/2012
001668 ALDWORTH, CRAIG
Expenses
001.032.000.543
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
87.71
Total :
87.71
26571
8/1/2012
002931 ALL WESTERN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY
93580
101.042.000.542
SUPPLIES. PW
153.40
Total :
153.40
26572
8/1/2012
003089 ALL WESTERN MACHINE WORKS
21025
101.042.000.542
DRILL BORING FOR SHOP
121.74
Total :
121.74
26573
8/1/2012
000160 ALLIED ENVELOPE CO.
132962
001.018.014.514
ENVELOPES FOR PAYROLL
252.05
Total :
252.05
26574
8/1/2012
003076 AMSDEN, ERICA
Expenses
001.032.000.543
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
13.32
Total :
13.32
26575
8/1/2012
002638 ARROW CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY
106626
101.042.000.542
CORE DRILLAND STAND
2,516.80
Total :
2,516.80
26576
8/1/2012
000030 AVISTA
July 2012
101.042.000.542
UTILITIES: PW MASTER AVISTA
23,698.60
Total :
23,698.60
26577
8/1/2012
001565 BERRETH THOMAS PRINTING
28373
001.032.000.543
PRINTING - GRID SHEETS: PW
239.14
Total :
239.14
26578
8/1/2012
003090 BIG R STORES
042955/3
101.000.000.542
SUPPLIES FOR PW
13.03
042958/3
101.042.000.542
SUPPLIES FOR PW
13.02
4288613
101.042.000.543
SUPPLIES FOR PW
10.86
Total :
36.91
26579
8/1/2012
000168 BLACK BOX NETWORK SVC
SPO - 031450
001.090.000.518
SERVICE CALL
323.39
Total :
323.39
26580
8/1/2012
000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC
9347485
001.076.305.575
LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLYAT C
148.03
S0035335
001.076.305.575
LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLYAT C
246.58
Page: 1
vchlist Voucher List Page: 2
08/0112012 12.04.40PM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund /Dept Description /Account Amount
26580 8/1/2012 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC (Continued)
16.25
56.25
467.11
5,706.77
5,706.77
9,124.01
9,124.01
5.80
3.00
8.80
63.75
63.75
90.00
90.00
5,286.92
3,395.48
903.20
9,585.60
217.44
217.44
88.05
109.79
218.49
416.33
34.99
34.99
R l or
Page: 2
S0035368
001.076.305.575
LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLYATC
S0036247
001.076.305.575
LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLYATC
Total
26581
811/2012
000796 BUDINGER & ASSOC INC
H12256 -1
403.000.163.595
ON CALL MATERIALS TESTING
Total
26582
8/1/2012
000863 CENTURY WEST ENG CORP
233156
001.032.000.543
2012 TIP SERVICES - EXPIRES 12/:
Total
26583
8/1/2012
001169 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
July 2012
001.058.056558
PETTY CASH: 7800, 8151, 8152
July 2012
001.058.056.558
PETTY CASH: 7799, 7786,87
Total:
26584
8/1/2012
000109 COFFEE SYSTEMS INC
3820:111250
001.076305.575
COFFEE SUPPLIES: CP
Total :
26585
8/1/2012
003092 CRIDDLE, JULIE
Refund
001.076.302.347
AQUATICS REFUND
Total :
26586
8/1/2012
000734 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
RE- 313- ATB20717065
101.042.000.542
STATE ROUTE ROADWAY MAINTEF
RE- 313- ATB20717066
101.042.000.542
SIGNAL & ILLUMINATION MAIN
RE- 313- ATB20717073
101.042.000.542
INTELLIGENT TRAFFIC SYSTEMS,'
Total :
26587
8/1/2012
000912 DEX MEDIA WEST
July 2012
001.076.305.575
ADVERTISING FOR CENTERPLACE
Total :
26588
8/1/2012
002389 DIRECTPOS
14051
001.076.302.576
SERVICE AT TERRACE VIEW POOL
14058
001.076.302.576
SERVICE FOR TERRACE VIEW PO,
14301
001.076.302.576
SERVICE AT PARK ROAD POOL
Total
26589
8/1/2012
002920 DIRECTV, INC
18167568825
101.042.000.543
JULY 2012 CABLE SERVICES: MAII`
Total :
26590
8/1/2012
003091 DODD, KATHY
Refund
001.076.302.347
AQUATICS REFUND
16.25
56.25
467.11
5,706.77
5,706.77
9,124.01
9,124.01
5.80
3.00
8.80
63.75
63.75
90.00
90.00
5,286.92
3,395.48
903.20
9,585.60
217.44
217.44
88.05
109.79
218.49
416.33
34.99
34.99
R l or
Page: 2
vchlist Voucher List Page: 3
08/01/2012 12:04:40PM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
Fund /Dept
Description/Account
Amount
26590
8/1/2012
003091 003091 DODD, KATHY
(Continued)
Total :
30.00
26591
8/1/2012
000746 EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPT
217156-002
502.502.000.517
2ND QTR 2012
361.47
Total :
361.47
26592
8/1/2012
001926 1=ARR, SARAH
Expenses
001.018.014.514
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
103.79
Total :
103.79
26593
8/1/2012
001232 1✓ASTENAL CO
IDLE83505
001.032.000.543
SUPPLIES FOR PW
229.88
IDLEW83491
101.042.000.542
SUPPLIES FOR PUBLIC WORKS
128.62
Total :
358.50
26594
8/1/2012
001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC
38167
001.011.000.511
LEGAL PUBLICATION
103.40
38170
001.058.056.558
LEGAL PUBLICATION
92.80
38171
001.058.056.558
LEGAL PUBLICATION
89.25
38173
001.058.056.558
LEGAL PUBLICATION
85.85
98174
001.058.056.558
LEGAL PUBLICATION
94.35
Total :
465.65
26595
8/1/2012
000007 GRAINGER
861093094
402.402.000.538
SUPPLIES: PW
107.01
Total :
107.01
26596
8/1/2012
002568 GRANICUS INC
37641
001.011.000.511
BROADCASTING SERVICES
719.59
Total :
719.59
26597
8/1/2012
000917 GRAYBAR
960902799
001.090.000.518
SUPPLIES FOR IT
103.59
961314410
101.042.000.542
SUPPLIES: PW
4.78
Total :
108.37
26598
8/1/2012
000002 H & H BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC.
June 2012
001.058.057.559
COPIER COST
2,71224
Total :
2,712.24
26599
8/1/2012
000009 HEWLETT PACKARD CO
67306844
001.090.000.518
HP DATA PROTECTOR SUPPORT F
1,563.71
Total :
1,563.71
26600
8/1/2012
000741 HONEY BUCKETS
1- 490715
001.076.300.576
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL: PARKS
154.00
Total :
154.00
Page: 3
vchlist
Voucher List
Page, 4
08101/2012
12:04:40PM
Spokane Valley
Bank code:
apbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
Fund /Dept
Description/Account
Amount
26601
8/1/2012
002520 HUSKY INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS
69648
101.000.000.542
SUPPLIES:PW
178.33
Total :
178.33
26602
8/1/2012
000265 JACKSON, MIKE
August 2012
001.013.000.513
MONTHLY AUTO ALLOWANCE
300.00
Total :
300.00
26603
8/1/2012
000864 JUB ENGINEERS, INC.
0076741
101.042.000.542
TIP DATA MAINTENANCE AND UPD
8,211.08
Total :
8,211.08
26604
8/1/2012
000252 LOWE'S BUSINESSACCOUNT
July 2012
001.076.305.575
OPERATING SUPPLIES: CP
197.83
Total :
197.83
26605
8/1/2012
000788 MEDIAJOE, INC.
3405
001.090.000.594
BROADCASTING EQUIPMENT
451.11
Total :
451.11
26606
8/1/2012
000258 MICROFLEX INC.
20706
001.090.000.518
TAXTOOLS SOFTWARE RENTAL - J
343.83
Total:
343.83
26607
8/1/2012
002941 NORTHSTAR CLEAN CONCEPTS
8371
101.042.000.542
CLEANING SUPPLIES: MAINT FACI
239.14
Total :
239.14
26608
8/1/2012
000193 NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL, INC
August 2012
001.090.000.518
CITY HALL RENT
39,566.35
Total :
39,566.35
26609
8/1/2012
000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC.
616430234001
001.032.000.543
OFFICE SUPPLIES PW
11.67
616721425001
001.076.305.575
SUPPLIES: CENTERPLACE
41.07
616721560001
001.076.301.574
OFFICE SUPPLIES: CP
30.62
616721561001
001.076.000.576
OFFICE SUPPLIES: PARKS & REC
56.60
616721562001
001.076.000.576
OFFICE SUPPLIES: CENTERPLACE
19.56
Total :
15952
26610
8/1/2012
000307 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER
June 2012
001.01 6.000.586
STATE REMITTANCE
52,211.76
Total :
52,211.76
26611
8/1/2012
002844 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC
1206303
001.058.050.558
LOCATOR TICKET MGMT SYSTEM
61.60
Total :
61.60
26612
8/1/2012
002424 PITNEY BOWES GLOBAL
1428301 -JY12
001.090.000.518
JULY 2012 POSTAGE METER RENT
275.00
Page: 4
vchlist
Voucher List
Page: 5
08/01/2012
12 :04 :4013M
Spokane Valley
Bank code:
apbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
FundlDept
Description/Account
Amount
26612
8/1/2012
002424 002424 PITNEY BOWES GLOBAL
(Continued)
Total :
275.00
26613
8/1/2012
001860 PLATT
1997477
001.076.305.575
SUPPLIES: CP
112.03
Total :
112.03
26614
8/112012
000453 ROLLER VALLEY
5080
001.076.301.574
SUMMER DAY CAMP FIELD TRIP
128.00
Total:
128.00
26615
81112012
000415 ROSAUERS
641940
001.076.301.574
SUPPLIES FOR REC PROGRAMS
32.68
678232
001.076.301.574
SUPPLIES FOR REC PROGRAMS
26.31
679762
001.076301.574
SUPPLIES FOR REC PROGRAMS
7.34
Total :
66.33
26616
8/1/2012
000235 SECURE SHRED
80681
001.090.000.518
SHREDDING CHARGES
162.60
Total :
162.60
26617
8/1/2012
000318 SHAMROCK MANUFACTURING
2157
101.042.000.542
SUPPLIES FOR PW
21.83
Total :
21.83
26618
8/1/2012
000854 SHERRY PRATT VAN VOORHIS, INC
1349.03
309.309.165.594
0165 TERRACE VIEW PARK - PRO.,
4,290.00
Total :
4,290.00
26619
8/1/2012
002531 SIX ROBBLEES INC
5- 641009
101.042.000.542
SUPPLIES: PW
213.90
Total :
213.90
26620
8/1/2012
000090 SPOKANE CO INFO SYSTEMS
50308233
001.018.013.513
COUNTY IT SUPPORT
16,930.73
Total:
16,930.73
26621
8/1/2012
000308 SPOKANE CO PROSECUTING ATTY
June 2012
001.016.000.586
CRIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION F
755.18
Total :
755.18
26622
8/1/2012
000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST#3
July 2012
101.042.000.542
WATER CHARGES: PW
182.76
July 2012
001.076.302.576
WATER CHARGES: PARKS
383.48
Total :
566.24
26623
8/1/2012
002540 SPOKANE HOUSE OF HOSE INC.
225628
101.000.000.542
SUPPLIES PW
734.35
Total :
734.35
Page: 5
vchlist
8/1/2012
Voucher List
page: 6
08/0112012
12 :04 :40PM
Spokane Valley
SRCAA
Bank code:
apbank
001.018.014.514
OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
Fund/Dept Description /Account Amount
26624
8/1/2012 000406 SPOKANE REGIONAL CVB
55330
105.105.001.557 2012 LODGING TAX REIMBURSEMI 23,739.44
Total :
001.076.305.575
Total : 23,739.44
26625
8/1/2012 002978 SPOKANE SODA WORKS
M12343
101.000.000 542 SNOW PLOW REPAIR: PW 2 017 50
26626
8/1/2012
000311
SPRINT
26627
8/1/2012
000202
SRCAA
26628 8/1/2012 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE
26629
26630
26631
26632
26633
26634
9667202
8/1/2012 000773 STUDIO CASCADE, INC.
8/1/2012 000419 SUMMIT LAW GROUP
959698810 -056
2213
3177566970
1743
57842
$1112012 001911 THE GLOVER MANSION CP558
CP614
8/1/2012 000295 VALLEYFEST July 2012
July 2012
8/1/2012 002909 WA DEPT OF ENTERPRISE SERVICES 18 -1 -57860
8/1/2012 001885 ZAYO BANDWIDTH LLC July 2012
June 2012
7/27/2012 000409 DEPT OF REVENUE 2nd QTR 2012
001.076.302.576 USE TAX RETURN: COMBINED EXC
2,017.50
71.07
71.07
28,892.25
28,892.25
215.87
215.87
2,450.00
2,450.00
484.50
484.50
230.90
152.18
383.08
1,090.00
987.50
2,077.50
500.00
500.00
550.00
242.39
792.39
776.83
Page: 6
Total :
001.058.057.559
GPS PHONE
Total :
001.090.000.531
3RD QTR 2012
Total
001.018.014.514
OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE
Total
001-076.000.576
P &R MASTER PLAN UPDATE
Total
001.018.016.516
PROFESSIONAL SVC: GENERAL El
Total :
001.076.305.575
EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLAI
001.076.305.575
EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLAI
Total :
001.090.000.550
OUTSIDE AGENCY GRANT: ECONC
001.090.000.550
OUTSIDE AGENCY GRANT: ECONC
Total
001.090.000.518
3RD QTR 2012 CO -OP MEMBERSH
Total
001.090.000.518
HIGH SPEED INTERNET: CITY HAL
001.090.000.518
JUNE 2012: DARK FIBER LEASE
Total
001.076.302.576 USE TAX RETURN: COMBINED EXC
2,017.50
71.07
71.07
28,892.25
28,892.25
215.87
215.87
2,450.00
2,450.00
484.50
484.50
230.90
152.18
383.08
1,090.00
987.50
2,077.50
500.00
500.00
550.00
242.39
792.39
776.83
Page: 6
vchlist
Voucher List
Page: 7
0810112012
12:04:40PM
Spokane Valley
Bank code:
apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice Fund /Dept Description /Account
Amount
9667202
7/27/2012 000409 000409 DEPT OF REVENUE
(Continued)
Total : 776.83
731120025
7/31/2012 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER
9290200350 001.016.000.521 LAW ENFORCEMENT
1 368 839 84
68 Vouchers for bank code: apbank
68 Vouchers in this report
1, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury,
that the materials have been furnished, the services
rendered, or the labor performed as described herein
and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid
obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that
am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim_
Finance Director Date
Mayor
Council Member
Date
Date
Total : 1,368,839.84
Bank total : 1,651,017.25
Total vouchers : 1,651,017.25
Page: 7
vchlist Voucher List Page: 1
08/01/2012 12:37 :02PM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor
26635 8/112012 003093 BRANDENBURG, ILENE
26636 8/1/2012 003094 HOISINGTON, CHAD AND LOREE
26637 8/1/2012 003096 LONG, RAY
26638 8/1/2012 001627 STCU
26639 8/1/2012 003095 ZLI3 PLASMA SERVICES
5 Vouchers for bank code: apbank
5 Vouchers in this report
1, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury,
that the materials have been furnished, the services
rendered, or the labor performed as described herein
and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid
obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that
am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim.
Finance Director Date
Mayor Date
Council Member Date
Invoice Fund/Dept Description /Account
CRYWOLF: 3569055979 001.000.000.342 CRYWOLF REFUND: PERMIT # V4E
Total :
CRYWOLF: 3566858728E 001.000.000.342 CRYWOLF REFUND: PERMIT # WE
Total :
CRYWOLF: 3566775478 001.000.000.342 CRYWOLF REFUND: PERMIT# V44
Total:
CRYWOLF: 59506 001.000.000.342 CRYWOLF REFUND: PERMIT## V4E
Total :
CRYWOLF: 333335 001.000.000.342 CRYWOLF REFUND, PERMIT #WE
Total :
Bank total
Total vouchers
Amount
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
125.00
125.00
Page: 1
vchlist Voucher List Page: 1
08/02/2012 10:26:29AM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor
26640 8/2/2012 001606 BANNER BANK
1 Vouchers for bank code: apbank
1 Vouchers in this report
1, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury,
that the materials have been fumished, the services
rendered, or the labor performed as described herein
and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid
obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that
I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim.
Finance Director
Date
Mayor
Date
Council Member
Date
Invoice
Fund/Dept
Description /Account
Amount
0618
001.011.000.511
JUNE 2012: 0618
74518
4064
001.058.056.558
J U N E 2012: 4064
826.77
4375
001.011.000.511
JUNE 2012: 4375
628.69
4458
001.011.000.511
J U N E 2012: 4458
1,925.07
8861
001.076.305.575
JUNE 2012: 8861
380.25
9048
001.018.014.514
JUNE 2012: 9048
1,068.50
Total : 5,575.06
Bank total : 5,575.06
Total vouchers : 5,575.06
Page: 1
vchlist
Voucher List
Page: 1
08107/2012
11:58:30AM
Spokane Valley
sank code :
apbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
Fund /Dept
Description /Account
Amount
4018
8/3/2012
000048 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS, 401A PLAN
Ben44946
001.231.14.00
401A: Payment
22,763.98
Total:
22,763.98
4019
8/3/2012
000682 EFTPS
Sen44948
001.231.11.00
FEDERALTAXFS: Payment
34,886.76
Total:
34,886.76
4020
8/3/2012
000145 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS, 457 PLf Ben44950
001.231.18.00
457 DEFERRED COMPENSATION: Payr
6,661.48
Total:
6,661.48
4021
8/3/2012
000162 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS, 401A EXEC P1 Ben44952
001.231.14.00
401 EXEC PLAN: Payment
1,052.33
Total:
1,052.33
4038
8/312012
000682 EFTPS
Ben44956
001.231.12.00
FEDERALTAXES: Payment
743.24
Total:
743.24
26641
8/3/2012
000120 AWC
Ben44936
303231.16.00
HEALTH PLANS: Payment
102,246.45
Ben44954
001.231.16.00
HEALTH PLANS (COUNCIL): Payment
8,204.00
Total ;
110,450.45
26642
8/3/2012
000165 DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS
Ben44938
001.231.15,00
PERS: Payment
52,863.25
Total:
52,863.25
26643
8/3/2012
002227 IDAHO TAX COMMISSION
Ben44940
001.231.50.03
IDAHO STATE TAX BASE: Payment
1,266.33
Total:
1,266.33
26644
8/3/2012
000699 WA COUNCIL COICITY EMPLOYEES
Sen44942
001,231.21.00
UNION DUES: Payment
2,160.39
Total:
2,160.39
26645
8/3/2012
002574 WASHINGTON TRUST BANK
Ben44944
001.231.20.00
SFRG20110 -02- 03952 -4: Payment
871.50
Total:
871.50
10
Vouchers for bank code : apbank
Bank total :
233,719.71
10
Vouchers in
this report
Total vouchers:
233,719.71
Page: 1
vch I ist
08/07120/2 9:28:34AM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Bank code :
pk -ref
003112 DALY, BREE
REFUND
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
5450
8/7/2012
003120 AMERICAN CHILDHOOD CANCER ORG,
REFUND
5451
8/7/2012
003114 ATWOOD, LORETTA
REFUND
5452
8/7/2012
003111 BAFUS, KAREN
REFUND
5453
8/7/2012
003103 BARNES, RAVEN
REFUND
5454
8/7/2012
003099 BLAUER, LEEELLA
REFUND
5455
8/7/2012
003097 CAJIGAS, DENISE
REFUND
5456
8/7/2012
003105 CAVINESS, JERALDINE
REFUND
5457
8/7/2012
002855 CORNERSTONE CHURCH
REFUND
5458
8/7/2012
003112 DALY, BREE
REFUND
5459
8/7/2012
003115 DEMPSEY, PAT
REFUND
5450
8/7/2012
003104 ELLIS, BRENDA
REFUND
5461
8/7/2012
003107 HANSEN, REBECCA
REFUND
5462
8/7/2012
003108 HEDEN, CRYSTAL
REFUND
Page: 7
Fund /Dept
Description/Account
Amount
001 237.10.99
DEPOSIT REFUND: GREENACRES
52.00
Total :
52.00
001.237.10.99
DEPOSIT REFUND: FIRESIDE LOUI
210.00
Total :
210.00
001.237.10.99
DEPOSIT REFUND: BROWNS PART'
52.00
Total :
52.00
001237.10.99
DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU SPF
52.00
Total :
52.00
001.237.10.99
DEPOSIT REFUND: GREAT ROOM
210.00
Total :
210.00
001.237.10.99
SUMMER CAMP REFUND
56.00
Total:
56.00
001.237.10.99
DEPOSIT REFUND: VALLEY MISSIC
52.00
Total:
52.00
001.237.10.99
DEPOSIT REFUND: VALLEY MISSIC
52.00
Total :
52.00
001.237.10.96
CANCELLATION REFUND: GREAT F
390.00
Total:
390.00
001.237.10,99
DEPOSIT REFUND: FIRESIDE LOUI
210.00
Total :
210.00
001.237.10.99
CANCELLATION REFUND: YOGA G
35.00
Total :
35.00
001.237.10.99
DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU SPF
52.00
Total :
52.00
001.237.10.99
CANCELLATION REFUND: MIRABE
136.00
Page: 1
vchlist
Voucher List
Page:
2
08/07/2012
9:28:34AM
Spokane Valley
Bank code:
Pk -ref
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
Fund /Dept
Description/Account
Amount
5462
8/7/2012
003108 003108 HEDEN, CRYSTAL
(Con#inued)
Total :
136.00
5463
8/7/2012
003116 HORIZON CREDIT UNION
REFUND
001237.10.99
DEPOSIT REFUND: ROOM 108 CEO
157.00
Total :
157.00
5464
8/7/2012
003121 KEMPFF, BETTY
REFUND
001.237.10.99
DEPOSIT REFUND: TERRACE VIEV
52.00
Total :
52.00
5465
8/7/2012
003117 MEALS ON WHEELS, HOLLY CHILINSKI
REFUND
001237.10.99
DEPOSIT REFUND: VALLEY MISSIC
52.00
Total :
52.00
5466
8/7/2012
003098 MITTLER, MANDEE
REFUND
001.237.10.99
CANCELLATION REFUND: CHEER
75.00
Total :
75.00
5467
8/7/2012
001485 NARVRE, INC
REFUND
001.237.10.99
DEPOSIT REFUND: EDGECLIFF CE
52.00
Total :
52.00
5468
8/7/2012
003110 ONE*
REFUND
001.237.10.99
DEPOSIT REFUND: BROWN'S PARI
52.00
Total :
52.00
5469
8/7/2012
003102 PEGANOV, MARIYA
REFUND
001.237.10.99
DEPOSIT REFUND: GREAT ROOM
210.00
Total :
210.00
5470
8!712012
003101 POLLARD, MARY
REFUND
001.237.10.99
DEPOSIT REFUND: GREENACRES
52.00
Total :
52.00
5471
8/7/2012
003119 REED, BOB
REFUND
001.237.10.99
DEPOSIT REFUND: TERRACE VIEV
52.00
Total:
52.00
5472
8/7/2012
003118 RIDENBAUGH, STACIE
REFUND
001.237.10.99
DEPOSIT REFUND: GREENACRES
52.00
Total:
52.00
5473
8/7/2012
003100 ROATH, KEN
REFUND
001.237.10.99
DEPOSIT REFUND. FIRESIDE LOUI
178.00
Total:
178.00
5474
8/7/2012
003106 SPEAR, MICHELLE
REFUND
001.23710.99
CANCELLATION REFUND: MIRABE
84.00
REFUND
001.237.10.99
CANCELLATION REFUND: MIRABE
136.00
Total :
220.00
Page: 2
vchlist Voucher List Page: 3
0810712012 9 :28:34AM Spokane Valley
Bank code: pk -ref
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund /Dept Description/Account Amount
5475 8/7/2012 001986 SPOKANE MOUNTAINEERS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABE4U ME, 52.00
Total : 52.00
5476 8 /7/2012 003113 STUMBOUGH, LINDA REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: TERRACE V1EV 52.00
Total : 52.00
5477 8 /712012 003109 V1SCO, LAURA REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MISSION PARK 52.00
Total : 52.00
28 Vouchers for bank code : pk -ref Bank total : 2,919.00
28 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 2,919.00
1, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury,
that the materials have been furnished, the services
rendered, or the labor performed as described herein
and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid
obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that
I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim.
Finance Director Date
Mayor Date
Council Member Date
Page: 3
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 08 -14 -2012 Department Director Approval : ❑
Item: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Payroll for Period Ending July 31, 2012
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND:
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
Budget/Financial Impacts:
Employees
Council
Total
Gross:
$ 249,587.24
$ 5,475.00
$255,062.24
Benefits:
$ 130,157.09
$ 5,067.96
$135,225.05
Total payroll
$ 379,744.33
$ 10,542.96
$390,287.29
STAFF CONTACT: Raba Nimri
DRAFT
Attendance:
Councilmembers:
Tom Towey, Mayor
Gary Schimmels, Deputy Mayor
Dean Grafos, Councilmember
Brenda Grassel, Councilmember
Chuck Hafner, Councilmember
Ben Wick, Councilmember
Arne Woodard, Councilmember
MINUTES
City of Spokane Valley
City Council Executive Session
Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Staff:
Mike Jackson, City Manager
Cary Driskell, Acting City Attorney
John Whitehead, Human Resources Manager
EXECUTIVE SESSION: Mayor Towey called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.
It was then moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn into
executive session for approximately fifty minutes to discuss labor negotiations, and that no action is
anticipated upon return to open session. Council adjourned into executive session at approximately 5:02
p.m.
At approximately 6:01 p.m. Mayor Towey declared council out of Executive Session. It was moved by
Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 6:01
p.m.
Thomas E. Towey, Mayor
ATTEST:
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
Council Minutes: 07 -24 -2012 Page 1 of 1
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
MINUTES
City of Spokane Valley
City Council Regular Meeting
Formal Meeting Format
Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Mayor Towey called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
Attendance:
City Staff
Tom Towey, Mayor
Mike Jackson, City Manager
Gary Schimmels, Deputy Mayor
Cary Driskell, City Attorney
Dean Grafos, Councilmember
Mark Calhoun, Finance Director
Brenda Grassel, Councilmember
Mike Stone, Parks & Recreation Director
Chuck Hafner, Councilmember
Steve Worley, Senior Engineer
Ben Wick, Councilmember
John Hohman, Community Development Dir.
Arne Woodard, Councilmember
Scott Kuhta, Planning Manager
Mike Basinger, Senior Planner
Lori Barlow, Senior Planner
Rick VanLeuven, Police Chief
Carolbelle Branch, Public Information Officer
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
INVOCATION: Pastor Matthew Larson of Advent Lutheran Church gave the invocation.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Towey led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously
agreed to approve the agenda.
INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: n/a
COMMITTEE, BOARD, LIAISON SUN UgARY REPORTS:
Councilmember Hafner: said he attended STA (Spokane Transit Authority) meetings where they are
discussing budget; and attended the Spokane Regional Health District meeting where budget discussions
were underway also.
Councilmember Grassel: said she participated in two Ad Hoc Economic Development Committee
meetings and that Councilmember Wick will be discussing those in detail later, and that she met with
people from the Tourism Industry and Rivers users, and Parks Department; went to an ITA (International
Trade Alliance) Board meeting where they had an executive session to discuss the process for hiring a
new director, as the previous director left for a job with the private sector.
Deputy Mayor Schimmels: reported he went to a manufactured housing group meeting a few weeks ago;
went to an SRTC (Spokane Regional Transportation Council) meeting where about 35 people attended,
and he encouraged citizens to visit that meeting room in the railroad station.
Councilmember Grafos: said he went to the Builder's Hall of Fame induction dinner and said they are
aggressive in what they are trying to do in economic development.
Councilmember Wick: reported that he participated in two Ad Hoc Economic Development Committee
meetings; and attended a Chamber of Commerce business connection meeting.
Council Regular Meeting 07 -24 -2012 Page 1 of 6
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
Councilmember Woodard; said he also attended the Chamber business connection meeting where the
three candidates for County Commissioner spoke; and about two weeks ago heard Lt. Col Shore speak,
who was a POW in Desert Storm.
MAYOR'S REPORT: Mayor Towey reported that he attended the Air Quality Committee meeting; met
the new Chief Executive Officer of the YMCA, attended a Philippine American Association meeting; and
today had a radio spot with KTW which will air Sunday.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mayor Towey invited general public comment.
Kathleen Blair, 1921 N Vista: read her statement about the problem with trucks in residential
neighborhoods, and she asked that Council make this a higher priority so a law can be adopted.
Fire Chief Mike Thompson: Spokane Valley Fire District, 2120 N Wilbur Road; remarked that Deputy
Chief Hale spoke a few weeks ago about the upcoming levy; he gave some history of the formation of the
Fire District; said it has always been a paid department; and in the mid 60's the maintenance and
operation levy was presented to voters, and continues to be presented to voters every three years; and said
that the levy rate for this ballot is the same amount collected in 2012.
1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any
member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered
separately.
a. Approval of the following claim vouchers:
VOUCHER LIST DATE VOUCHER NUMBERS; TOTAL AMOUNT
07/10/2012 3976 -3979; 3995 -3997; 26363 -26369 $257,768.25
07/11/2012 26370 - 26456; 628120035; 705120020 $2,128,154.05
GRAND TOTAL $2,385,922.30
b. Approval of Payroll for period ending July 15, 2012: $259,349.54
c. Approval of Minutes of July 3, 2012 Study Session Format Council Meeting
d. Approval of Minutes of July 10, 2012 Regular Formal Format Council Meeting
e. Approval of Minutes of July 17, 2012 Study Session Format Council Meeting
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the Consent
Agenda.
2. PUBLIC HEARING: Development Agreement in Connection with Proposed Comprehensive Plan
Amendment CPA 05 -12 — Mike Basinger
Mayor Towey explained that tonight's public hearing is on the development agreement associated with
the Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 05 -12, and encouraged the public to keep their comments to
the agreement. Mayor Towey opened the public hearing at 6:17 p.m. and invited Senior Planner Basinger
to the podium. Senior Planner Basinger explained the proposal to change the designation from Medium
Density Residential to High Density Residential and that the negotiated terms of the development
agreement include limiting density to 22 units per acre, that the main access will be Broadway Avenue,
Alki Road will not be improved, the developer will construct a ten -foot shared use path from Moore to
Sonora and bollards will be placed at each end to prevent vehicle access, and that there will be a 40' wide
area of restriction surrounding the property, which will restrict the building height to 35 feet.
Councilmember Grassel asked if once approved, could any further changes be made to the agreement, and
Mr. Basinger replied that changes would be possible, but that the agreement would need to come back for
council approval. City Attorney Driskell added that this would be a contract between the Developer and
Council, the agreement would be recorded with the County, and that the agreement would run with the
property. Mayor Towey invited public comment.
Council Regular Meeting 07 -24 -2012 Page 2 of 6
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
1. Jerry Combs, 405 N Sonora Lane: mentioned the fine print on Exhibit A indicates a fire emergency
area and he'd like clarification. Mr. Basinger stated there is no intention to have an emergency access off
Sonora and no need for a fire access and that if that is in the fine print, staff will clean that up.
2. Katherine Potter, 622 N Moore Road: wanted screening landscaping required.
3. Dennis Crapo, 2602 N Sullivan: said all the agreements should be consistent and same rules applied to
all developers.
4. Joseph Wetzler, 424 N Moore: said he thought he would be speaking to the Planning Department;
spoke about a previous development where developers built into the right -of- way that denied access to
property owners of Valleyway. Mayor Towey reminded him the topic is this development agreement.
Mr. Wetzler spoke about the corner of Moore Road to Senora where curbs weren't put in and where there
were half - completed projects.
5. Linda Rockhold, 423 Conklin Road: asked if a street light would be put on Broadway as she feels one
is needed.
6. Cheryl McManamon, 504 N Conklin Road: said she thought a development agreement meant the
developer was going to meet with the neighbors, and now realizes that is not the case; said a light was
promised at the end of Conklin and Broadway and that there is a fence blocking the view; that this is not
on a bus route; it's not in agreement with the comprehensive plan as it won't preserve and protect their
neighborhood, and that Councilmember Grafos had previously said he received campaign money from the
developer and therefore feels he could not vote fairly.
7. Jan Wold, 503 N Conklin Road: doesn't want any large facility as it's not welcome and does not fit
with the neighborhood; and agrees Mr. Grafos should not be allowed to vote on this issue.
8. F.J. Dullanty, Jr. 422 West Riverside, Attorney for Developer Arger: said the area referred to is not a
buffer but a restricted zone where they are limited to building single family residential; said all aspects of
the City's code must be followed; said likely a fence will be erected and shrubs put in; said the roadways
are just the site plan; a traffic study was done and determined no light is required.
9. Richard Wilcox, 16102 E. Broadway: extended thanks to Council for their work on this proposal.
10. Dwight Hume, 9101 N Mountain View Lane, Spokane, speaking on behalf of Mr. Arger: said he is
pleased with the elements of the draft agreement; commented that it would be impossible to have every
development agreement alike as they are site specific; and said this proposal is a much better blend than
what is currently permitted by code in that area.
11. Peggy Cunningham 16113 E. Valleyway: said there are some three -story apartments across the street
from her; that you can't see coming out from the complex on one way, and that the traffic is so heavy you
can't make a left -hand turn off Valleyway; and putting apartments on Broadway will make a big mess.
There were no other public comments. There was Council discussion concerning the landscaping and
what would be required and included in the Development Agreement, with Planner Basinger explaining
that Type 1 landscaping will be required all the way around the complex, which includes a 6' wall fence
with slates, and a mix of trees on the inside of the fence. There was also discussion about the setback and
area of restriction, as well as discussion about the main access entrance from Broadway, and that signage
will help direct people to that main access. Mayor Towey closed the public hearing at 7:03 p.m.
NEW BUSINESS:
3. Motion Consideration: Approval of Development Agreement, CPA 05 -12 — Mike Basinger
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to approve and authorize the City Manager to
finalize and execute the development agreement associated with CPA 05 -12. Mayor Towey invited
public comment.
1. Jan Wold, 503 N Conklin Road: asked if there would be ample parking or if people would be parking
on the streets. Planner Basinger said a certain number of parking spaces will be required, and that will
include taking into consideration parking for visitors, but there will not be "no parking" signs and sand
we cannot guarantee people won't park on the street.
Council Regular Meeting 07 -24 -2012 Page 3 of 6
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
2. Jerry Combs, 405 N Sonora: said if there is no parking on Broadway, Conklin will be limited due to its
width and said there will be nothing to stop people from parking at the end of their cul -de -sac.
3. Kathryn Potter, 622 N Moore: voiced concern about the lack of sidewalks on Conklin.
4. Greg Arger, 300 N Mull Road: explained about the parking requirements that would be associated with
his building, and said they have every intention to exceed code regarding parking requirements; said these
types of projects are successful as they try to create a product with amenities that are marketable based on
what is reasonable and what is working in the market place. Planning Manager Kuhta clarified the
parking requirements of one space per dwelling unit for one and two bedroom apartments, plus 5% to
accommodate guests. In response to Councilmember Grassel's question about sidewalks, Mr. Kuhta said
frontage improvements are required for any new development, and they only have to improve that part on
Conklin.
5. Dennis Crapo, 222 Sullivan: said he feels a precedent is being set by not having consistent
development agreements, and said there is vague language in the development agreement.
6. Luke Davis, 16323 E Valleyway: also asked Council to consider parking issues.
7. Peggy Cunningham 16113 E. Valleyway: said she wants the same consideration for this project as the
people at the Shelley Lake project; and said if she had known this was going to happen, she might have
sold her house and moved away.
Mr. Basinger again explained the 40' setback and area of restriction in response to further Council
questions; said that there will be a 40' buffer surrounding the entire property that will limit the height to
35 feet; and said if Mr. Crapo had had a 40' restriction all the way around his property, he would not
have been able to develop his property; and said if the developer wanted to build a structure that was 35'
or lower, it could be 5' from the property line; which he said is just like the residential zone of the
neighbors; and said with a single family residence, there is a clear definition of a rear and a front yard; but
that is not the case with a multi - family structure. Mr. Dullanty also commented on what would or would
not be permitted. After further discussion about the number of allowed stories, the setback and the area of
restriction, it was moved by Councilmember Grafos and seconded, to amend the motion by approving the
development agreement with the following changes: under 2.2.5.2 add in the 40' restricting area
surrounding the project, the building will be limited to two -story building with no balconies or decks
within the 40' restricted area facing toward the parameter, and on Exhibit A, to remove the reference to
an emergency exit on Senora and remove the reference to a 40' single story only. Mayor Towey invited
further public comment. Jerry Combs, 405 N Sonora, said it is a 35' building height and said that wasn't
covered. After Council discussion it was determined that reference was not changed in the agreement.
Kathryn Potter, 622 N Moore: said the planner "threw a big fit" when he was limited to nonhabitable
spaces, and said the intent of the building is obvious that he will put two -story residences five feet off the
back of her property, and said she doesn't want people looking down to her yard and that having a
balcony or not is irrelevant; and said it should say "non- habitable." Jeff Potter, 522 N Moore agreed with
his wife's statement and does not want a two -story building off the back of his yard. Frank Hebis, 16210
E Broadway, asked why the property owner isn't allowed to build within 15' feet of their property line in
the back but can build within 5' of the property line from the back of the homes. Richard Wilcox, 16120
E Broadway: said it is his understanding that it will be 35' buildings out further away from the property
line than what it is. Dennis Crapo, 2602 N Sullivan: said the buffer zone discussed is really just an area
that they can build a 35' structure in, and is not a setback, and said Council already previously determined
it should be a 40' setback, but he hears tonight it should be 5' and said for one project it should be 40',
but for this project, the setback should be 5'.
Greg Amer, 300 N Mullan: said the intent was to agree to a 40' restricted area, and said typically
developments are buffered by garages, which are one story or possibly two, and there may be an
opportunity to provide some townhouses along this area or something to mitigate the tall building to the
surrounding neighbors; and said they have not gone through a design criteria on this; and said they are
trying to be allowed the flexibility to have a townhouse or a loft without impeding the neighborhood, and
Council Regular Meeting 07 -24 -2012 Page 4 of 6
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
said it is not practical to compare one development agreement for one property, to that of another property
as the demographics are different in each area; and said this site supports the traffic with access to
Broadway; and said it works if they have the flexibility to work within the two - story; and said it is
difficult to design today and be restricted to just one story, and said this was a means to be sensitive to the
surrounding neighborhood, and said they can accomplish that if they are allowed to have the two -story
along that restricted area. Joan Cook, on Sullivan and said she has a home on North Moore Street, and
spoke about previously getting a paper around asking this not be changed from residential to commercial,
and that Council changed it anyway for a contractor, and it appears the contractor will get exactly what he
wants. Dwight Hume, on behalf of Mr. Arger, and said they agree with the revisions of the amended
motion as it clarifies the intent of that 40' space; and said it is difficult without a site plan, to reach any
kind of appeasement of the manifestation of what that performance standard means; said we are in a
Growth Management Plan, which requires accommodating future populations; and said when we start
micromanaging the places where residential can go just because the neighbors don't want it, that ignores
the intent of what that performance standard change was all about. There were no further public
comments. It was then moved by Councilmember Grassel to further amend the motion concerning no
balconies or decks, to include no windows. The motion was not seconded and therefore did not move
forward. Vote by acclamation on whether to amend the motion as earlier stated.- In Favor: Mayor Towey,
Deputy Mayor Schimmels, and Councilmembers Woodard and Grafos. Opposed: Councilmembers
Hafner, Grassel and Wick. Motion to amend passed. Vote by acclamation on the fully amended motion:
In Favor: Mayor Towey, Deputy Mayor Schimmels, and Councilmembers Woodard and Grafos.
Opposed: Councilmembers Hafner, Grassel and Wick. Motion carried. Mayor Towey called for a recess
at 8:30 p.m. He reconvened the meeting at 8:45 p.m.
At 8:45 p.m. it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed, to exceed the
meeting for one hour. He also mentioned there would be no Executive Session after the meeting.
4. First Reading roposed Ordinance 12 -020 Amending_ Spokane Valley Municipal Code 8.25.025
Solicitation Exceptions — Cary Driskell
After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and
seconded to advance Ordinance 12 -020 amending Spokane Valley Municipal Code 8.25.025 relating to
solicitation from vehicle occupants, to a second reading. Legal Intern Ashley Stoltz explained as she did
during the first reading, that these changes are being proposed in order to make the provisions consistent
with other provisions within the Code. After brief discussion about sidewalks and curbs, Mayor Towey
invited public comment. No comments were offered. It was also noted that the motion refers to the new
draft ordinance just distributed to Council tonight. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Mayor Towey, Deputy
Mayor Schimmels, and Councilmembers Hafner, Grafos, Wick and Woodard. Opposed.- Councilmember
Grassel. Motion carried.
5. Motion Consideration: Transportation Improvement Board Call for Projects — Steve Worla
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to authorize staff to submit a 2012 TIB grant
application for the Sullivan Road West Bridge Replacement Project #0155. Senior Engineer Worley
explained the history of this proposal as noted in the July 24, 2012 Request for Council Action Form.
Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor:
Unanimous. Opposed. None. Motion carried.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mayor Towey invited general public comments, no comments were offered.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS:
6. Shoreline Master Program (SMP) Goals and Policies — Lori Barlow
Senior Planner Barlow explained that at the last meeting, the draft goals and policies were introduced and
the approval process discussed, and tonight Mr. Tadas Kisielius will lead further discussion on these draft
Council Regular Meeting 07 -24 -2012 Page 5 of 6
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
goals and policies, with the anticipated date of August le as the date for Council to consider a resolution
to accept the draft, either as presented or with modifications. Mr. Kisielius explained that the purpose of
the goals and policies is to have a broad statement of the City's vision to shape the overall approach, and
said the process is much the same as the comprehensive plan amendment policy; he said some of the
detail will be missing as these are generalized vision statements, but that the details will be flushed out
while keeping the appropriate level of abstraction and resisting the urge to fine tune each goal and policy.
He further explained that not everything will be implemented through development regulations alone, as
there are other ways of accomplishing this, like incentives or other mechanisms, and then explained some
of the areas which were mandated by the state statutes and /or Washington Regulations; and reminded
Council that it is not his job to approve or reject policy decisions as those are at the discretion of Council,
with ultimate approval by the Department of Ecology. Mr. Kisielius also noted that there are two main
themes: what are the statutory standards that govern protection of the critical areas of shorelines, and to
assure no net loss; and to balance the statutory shoreline requirements against constitutional protections
for private property owners. Further Council discussion in direction to staff to draft a policy that
recognized the Centennial Trail as an economic asset and review the language of policies 5.2 and 12.10
for conflicts.
At 9:45 p.m., it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to extend the
meeting another fifteen minutes.
7. Advance Agenda — Mayor Towey
Deputy Mayor Schimmels noted the second reading of the ordinance regarding CPA 05 -12 is set for next
week, and since there would not be a full council, suggested moving it to August 14'h. There was brief
discussion concerning Councilmember Woodard's planned absence and of the possibility of him phoning
in on the City's connection, so that he would be able to hear the meeting and others would be able to hear
him. Councilmember Woodard said he would contact Mr. Jackson tomorrow to let him know whether he
would be able to attend the July 31 meeting. Councilmember Grassel asked about the process to "clean
up the code" so development agreements would not be necessary, and Community Development Director
Hohman noted that the topics of the Zoning Use Matrix, Revisions to the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment Process, and a review of Multi - family zone requirements are all scheduled for the August 21
council meeting.
8. Department Reports and (9) Sullivan Road Bridge Final Design Contract Amendment were for
information only and were not reported or discussed.
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: City Manager Jackson reported that this Thursday the committee on
Solid Waste will reconvene and listen to comments from Mr. Russ Menke on why there were no
responses to the Request for Proposals.
10. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Labor Negotiations [RCW 42.30.1140(4)]. There was no executive
session.
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting
adjourned at 9:50 p.m.
ATTEST:
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
Thomas E. Towey, Mayor
Council Regular Meeting 07 -24 -2012 Page 6 of 6
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
MINUTES
SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
STUDY SESSION FORMAT
Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers
Spokane Valley, Washington
July 31, 2012
Attendance:
6:00 p.m.
Councilmembers
Staff
Tom Towey, Mayor
Mike Jackson, City Manager
Gary Schimmels, Deputy Mayor
Cary Driskell, City Attorney
Dean Grafos, Councilmember
Mike Stone, Parks & Recreation Director
Brenda Grassel, Councilmember
Mark Calhoun, Finance Director
Chuck Hafner, Councilmember
John Hohman, Community Development Dir
Ben Wick, Councilmember
Scott Kuhta, Planning Manager
Arne Woodard, Councilmember
Mike Basinger, Senior Planner
Steve Worley, Senior Engineer
Morgan Koudelka, Sr. Administrative Analyst
Greg Bingaman, IT Specialist
Carolbelle Branch, Public Information Officer
Carrie Koudelka, Deputy City Clerk
Mayor Towey called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels,
seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the amended agenda.
ROLL CALL: Deputy City Clerk Koudelka called the roll; all Councilmembers were present.
1. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 12 -018 CPA 05 -12 — Mike Basinger
After Deputy City Clerk Koudelka read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels,
and seconded to approve ordinance 12 -018, Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 05 -12. Community
Development Director Hohman informed Council that staff updated the development agreement based on
the results of last week's meeting and the realization that the developer wanted to put dwelling units
within five feet of the setback area. He said they looked at the setbacks and staff recommends a ten -foot
setback. He said he discussed it with the developer who agreed to the stipulation. He said now the
agreement calls for a six -foot high fence, a five -foot landscape buffer and an additional ten -foot setback
before the beginning of any dwelling unit. Mr. Hohman said the developer has accepted and signed the
agreement. Mayor Towey invited public comment:
Richard Wilcox - 16120 E Broadwav: said he would like to know the reasoning as to why we have
standards that are not adhered to and he would like clarification.
Sheryl McManamon - 504 N Conklin Rd: said that if we widen her street due to the increased traffic, it
will cause her and her neighbors to have less than a forty-foot setback in front of her house. She asked
that if it is necessary to widen Conklin that it be to the minimum amount necessary for car safety. She
also asked that we install signs limiting traffic to residential access and no semi - trucks; and that
construction trucks only use Broadway to access the project property.
Douglas Florence - 415 N. Moore Rd: said he did not hear that we did a traffic analysis for safety
purposes on Moore and Broadway.
Catherine Potter - 622 N Moore Rd.: Thanked Council and staff for working so hard on the project and
granting additional time to work through it. She said she is in favor of rezoning to MF2 with no bonus
density and said a stair - stepping transition is the best option for the neighborhood. She requests that the
developer agreement specify single -story units in the buffer zone.
Delbert Liljegren - 418 N. Moore Rd: said he wants to work with the builders and appreciates the plan to
develop luxury apartments. He said he strongly requests the developer allow neighborhood
Council Study Session Minutes 07 -31 -12 Page 1 of 7
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
representatives to meet with the developer to work with the plans and concepts as they are finalized. He
said the neighborhood is concerned that they have not seen final plans.
Councilmember Woodard said he agrees that construction vehicles should use Broadway. He said we did
a traffic analysis and our traffic engineer presented it. He said he believes we need to give creative leeway
to the developer but he urges the developer to meet with neighbors about proposed concepts and that the
ten -foot buffer helps. Councilmember Grafos said he will vote for the project because it meets the criteria
for a zone change and he said he thinks the developer agreement is fair on both sides and the ten -foot
setback is reasonable. He said the project will generate revenue for the City. Councilmember Hafner said
the ten -foot setback solves some of the concerns he had. Councilmember Wick said the agreement makes
a good transition and compromise between the developer and the neighborhood. Mayor Towey said he
thinks they came up with the best developer agreement possible. Vote by acclamation: In Favor: Mayor
Towey, Deputy Mayor Schimmels, Councilmembers Grafos, Hafner, Wick, and Woodard. Opposed.
Councilmember Grassel. Motion carried.
2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 12 -019 CPA 05 -12 Zoning Map — Mike Basinger
After Deputy City Clerk Koudelka read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels
and seconded to approve Ordinance 12 -019 to update the Official Zoning Map for Comprehensive Plan
Amendment CPA 05 -12. Senior Planner Basinger explained the ordinance changes the zoning map to
coincide with the Comprehensive Plan amendment just passed by Council. Mayor Towey invited public
comment; no comments were offered. Vote by acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed. None.
Motion carried.
3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 12 -020 SVMC 8.25 Solicitation Exceptions — Cary Driskell
After Deputy City Clerk Koudelka read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels
and seconded to adopt ordinance 12 -020 amending SVMC 8.25.025 relating to solicitation from vehicle
occupants. Legal Intern Stolz said that when Council adopted the current solicitation ordinance, it
contained an exception for special permits to, under certain conditions, engage in charitable solicitation
from vehicles in the right -of -way. When the City amended SVMC 5.15 to remove such permits, language
in SVMC 8.25.025 pertaining to charitable solicitation became unnecessary, along with a provision that
pertains to parks that is now irrelevant. Ms. Stolz went on to say that staff looked at another provision in
SVMC 8.25.025C2b that defines "prohibitive roadway" as including the first five feet beyond the edge of
a paved shoulder where there is no sidewalk. Staff recommends amending that provision to state that it
"includes paved shoulders and bike lanes." Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were
offered. Vote by acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed.- None. Motion carried.
4. Bid Award, Phase 2 Preservation — Steve Worley
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to award the 2012 Street Preservation Project -
Phase 2 to the lowest responsible bidder, Spokane Rock Products, in the amount of $679,475.50. Senior
Engineer Worley said they had a successful bid opening and received bids from five bidders; Spokane
Rock Products was the lowest bidder and he recommends we award them the contract. Mayor Towey
invited public comment; no comments were offered. Councilmember Wick asked if there is a plan for the
money left over from the difference between the engineer estimate and the bid award. Mr. Worley said
there are still projects for which we can use that money but it is hard to predict winter weather so some of
those projects may not happen this year. He said there is about $400,000 left over from the $2.5 million
approved by Council for street preservation. He said he will verify those numbers but the intent is to
spend as much pavement preservation money as possible this year. Mayor Towey invited public
comment; no comments were offered. Vote by acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed.- None.
Motion carried.
5. Contract Amendment, Sullivan Road Bridge Design — Steve Worley
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to authorize the City Manager or his designee to
execute Contract Supplement #4 with CH2MHill in the Amount of $997,850.00 for the final design phase
Council Study Session Minutes 07 -31 -12 Page 2 of 7
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
of the Sullivan Road West Bridge Replacement Project #0155. Senior Engineer Worley said he has been
working with CH2M Hill for the design of the Sullivan Bridge. He said they started with a survey for the
project last fall and they have had several addendums since then. He said the preliminary design phase
included open houses to discuss staging and he explained the supplements. He said Supplement 4 is for
the final design of the bridge and is actually for $997,851.00. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels,
seconded and unanimously agreed to amend the motion by changing the dollar amount to $997,851.00.
Mr. Worley explained the project funding to date and said they added the study of a pedestrian bridge
under the main bridge. He said this option narrows the main bridge a little because it reduces the size of
the sidewalks and it provides a direct connection between Centennial Trail and Sullivan Park. He said this
supplemental does not include the design of the pedestrian bridge. Councilmember Woodard asked if we
are required to put temporary pedestrian access across the river during construction. Mr. Worley said we
are and we would likely build a temporary bridge on the upstream side of the northbound bridge. Mr.
Worley said the final design cost is $857,791.00 and optional services include an additional open house,
bridge visual simulation, Sullivan Park water main, illumination, park/trailhead irrigation, improved river
access and a ten percent management reserve fund. He said these costs are not covered by federal grants
so the City would be responsible to pay for these items. He said the location of the improved river access
has not been determined but he said he thinks it is important to put the river access point at Sullivan Park
and they are talking to the Park department and river users to determine the best site.
Mr. Worley said staff recommends moving ahead with all optional design services. Councilmember Wick
said there seems to be a trend around the region to incorporate artistic elements to bridge designs. Mr.
Worley said staff is not currently looking at artistic concepts but they can add that to the scope. He said
we haven't looked at artistic features because we want to get a federal grant to help pay for the bridge
replacement. City Manager Jackson reminded Council that every added feature is a use of preservation
dollars. Councilmember Hafner inquired as to the status of the bridge today. Mr. Worley said there are no
changes, an inspection is scheduled for October and he will update Council based on that inspection.
Councilmember Grassel asked why the staff costs are included in the supplement. Mr. Worley said we
have a project manager who works with the consultant on the project, and that eighty percent of staff cost
is paid by the grant. Councilmember Grassel asked what the open house costs include. Mr. Worley said it
includes costs for materials used for presenting the project, drawings, PowerPoints and other materials.
Councilmember Grassel asked what the current REET fund status is. Finance Director Calhoun said he
doesn't have that information at his fingertips but he will forward an analysis to Council. He said
although REET funds are down, they continue to come in. City Manager Jackson said REET funds are
down about $1,000,000, and that there are fewer grants to apply for but he said we can also use REET
funds for preservation. Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered.
Councilmember Grafos said that because we are spending $1.5 million with CH2M Hill, they should be
willing to throw in design elements as a good faith gesture based on how much we spend with them. Mr.
Worley said we are looking to add architectural detail but to hire someone to do artwork is not something
we had been considering. Deputy Mayor Schimmels said he does not want to add artwork.
Vote by acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed.- None. Motion carried.
Mayor Towey called for a break at 7: 37 p. m. The meeting reconvened at 7: 50 p. m.
6. Extension of Time for Economic Development Ad Hoc Committee — Councilmember Wick
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to extend the timeframe of the Economic
Development Ad Hoc Committee to the end of November or sooner if the committee feels they have
satisfied their directive. Councilmember Wick said the committee has been working very hard and they
are receiving feedback from stakeholders, and the committee would like more time to keep working.
Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by acclamation: In Favor:
Unanimous. Opposed. None. Motion carried.
Council Study Session Minutes 07 -31 -12 Page 3 of 7
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
7. Decant Facility — Steve Worley
Senior Engineer Worley went through his presentation and said the preferred stormwater maintenance
schedule is to clean catch basins every three years, drywells every three to seven years, and curb and
sidewalk inlets every three to seven years; however, he said there are too many out there and we are not
able to reach that preferred schedule. He said in 2010 hauling cost was $71,673 but with a decant facility,
proposed hauling decant cost would be reduced to $11,761. He said we would be able to clean more in
one day if we had a decant facility. He said we received a grant for $980,000 for an elaborate mechanical
system, but the current proposal will not be that expensive. He said the Ecology grant will pay seventy -
five percent with a twenty -five percent local match. Washington State Department of Transportation
( WSDOT) could share the cost of that local match but they would need to partner with us prior to June,
2013. He said we have an opportunity to partner with WSDOT and there are other entities in the region
with the same need including the Department of Ecology, Spokane County and Spokane. Ecology has
grant funds to locate three facilities: Mead, Spokane's Playfair site, and the WSDOT Pines Maintenance
yard, and a future site in West Plains. Possible decant locations for Spokane Valley are the Euclid site and
the WSDOT Pines site. He said he prefers the WSDOT site off Pines and Montgomery because it is
centrally located and has nearby I -90 access. He said WSDOT likes that site as well and he said WSDOT
has already prepared an environmental agreement for that site. The next step is to issue an RFQ (Request
for Qualifications) for a consultant to design a facility to be most effective and most efficient for Spokane
Valley and WSDOT. In the meantime, he said we would need an interlocal with WSDOT for maintenance
and operations. WSDOT recommends we select the consultant. Mr. Worley said WSDOT is not an
acceptable recipient for state grant funds as they are a state agency so Spokane Valley would be the lead
agency on the grant proposal. He said WSDOT is also not able to manage the project due to staffing
levels so we would partner with WSDOT for land and try for local matching funds. Councilmember Wick
asked if we have the same flexibility to accommodate a growing city if the facility is not on City -owned
property. Mr. Worley said the consultant will look at current and future needs, future expansion and our
ability to clean stormwater structures. Councilmember Woodard asked how we will handle liability
issues. City Manager Jackson said that those terms are negotiated. Councilmember Wick asked if the
RFQ would include our Euclid site. Mr. Worley said it would only look at the four that are on the
WSDOT sites unless there is some reason Council thinks we should look at the Euclid site because both
City and WSDOT staff believe the WSDOT Pines site is the better location and WSDOT is willing to
provide the property for it. Mr. Worley said we can start the process of selecting the consultant and have
them review the best location and in the meantime start developing an interlocal agreement for the
operations and maintenance of the facility. Mr. Worley said we should have that agreement in place
before we go to the design, construction and use of the facility. Councilmember Wick said he would like
us to include our Euclid site. Councilmember Grafos said he thinks we should move forward with an
interlocal agreement with WSDOT to make sure we are not expanding Spokane Valley staff and said if
we are looking to buy any equipment in the near future we should be looking at buying snowplows and
not vactoring trucks. He said he is in favor of moving forward provided WSDOT operates and maintains
the facility and equipment. Councilmember Hafner said he thinks it would be time and money consuming
to evaluate the Euclid property if staff has already determined the WSDOT Pines location is the best site.
Mr. Worley proposed we go forward with the RFQ, select a consultant and have them start evaluating the
WSDOT site, staff will start work on the interlocal agreement and if we can't come to an agreement we
have the option to then amend the consultant contract to include the Euclid site. Mayor Towey said he
thinks we should move forward as proposed by Mr. Worley; there was no objection from Council.
8. Animal Control — Morgan Koudelka
Senior Administrative Analyst Koudelka said staff received responses to the RFP (Request for Proposal)
for Animal Control Services from Spokane County SCRAPS (Spokane County Regional Animal
Protection Service) and SpokAnimal. He said as he presents a summary of the two proposals he would
like Council input as to Council priorities and their most important factors for animal control services so
he can further analyze both proposals based on the priorities of Council. He then went through the
PowerPoint presentation and said the RFP included six evaluation categories: 1) Level of Service 2)
Adoption Programs 3) Ability to Enforce Regulations 4) Financial Stability 5) Professionalism and 6)
Council Study Session Minutes 07 -31 -12 Page 4 of 7
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
Cost. Mr. Koudelka asked Council to tell him of the six categories, which are most important, weighted
heavier, or if there are other considerations they would like staff to incorporate into the evaluation.
Councilmember Hafner asked what the financial stability of SCRAPS has to do with Spokane Valley. Mr.
Koudelka said the reason that is included is to make sure the organizations are financially sound. City
Manager Jackson said the process is to look at both agencies equally and part of the consideration in any
long -term provider is the financial stability of the agency. Mr. Koudelka said SCRAPS is part of the
general fund of Spokane County and they share common resources with several other departments and as
any government agency, especially when times are tight, they make difficult decisions regarding the
funding level of various services they provide. He said we can request the service levels we expect to
receive on our contracts, but it is the County's prerogative to make funding decisions based on their
resources. Councilmember Hafner said with regard to "Contractor Relationship" on slide 19, he does not
like the negative connotation of the comment that Spokane Valley has had unresolved billing disputes
with the County. Mr. Jackson said staff provided the same information for SpokAnimal and gave an
objective comparison and Council will draw from it what they will. Councilmember Grassel said she
thinks it is important to have all the facts and asked how many staff both organizations have. Mr.
Koudelka read the list of positions from the SpokAnimal proposal and said they also have a clinic and a
humane service physician in addition to the animal shelter and animal control services so some of the
positions serve functions that are outside those for which we would be contracting. He then read the list of
positions for SCRAPS. He said both organizations heavily utilize volunteers: SCRAPS has 185 active
volunteers and SpokAnimal has 300.
Councilmember Woodard said he would like to have copies of both RFP's so he can study them. Mr.
Jackson reminded Council that a copy is available in the City Clerk's office and said we can reproduce
and distribute the proposals if Council wishes. Mr. Koudelka again asked Council for input as to their
priorities and what they want staff to consider. Councilmember Wick said he thinks we should use the list
as identified in going forward. Mr. Koudelka asked if staff should consider the items with equal weight or
if any specific areas weigh differently. Councilmember Woodard said to change the evaluation categories
would be unfair to both organizations and said the process for the relinquishing of pets is an important
part of the adoption process. He said cost is not the only factor; he would like to compare the two
proposals and said that the level of service ranks three or four on his list and cost is the least important
factor to consider. Councilmember Grafos said he wants a copy of the SCRAPS proposal before he is
comfortable making a twenty -year decision. He said the three items that are important to him are the
financial stability, the ability to enforce and the size and capacity of the facility. He said a depreciation
formula on the cost of the building rather than a cost of living increase for twenty years would be more
reasonable. Councilmember Hafner said he does not care for summaries because they don't give the
details. He said he wants copies of the proposals. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded,
and unanimously agreed to extend the meeting one hour. Mayor Towey suggested Council take the time
to read the RFP's to help make their decision. Mr. Jackson said staff will make copies of the proposals
for Council and said we need to think about how we evaluate the proposals. He said typically on an RFQ
(or RFP), the proposals are not provided to Council and that administratively staff reviews the proposals
and provides a summary to Council. He said he wants to review the process before moving forward and
said we may need to alter our steps. He said we will come back for further discussion on August 21st. Mr.
Koudelka said we are trying to accommodate the County's timeline because they have an arrangement on
the Trent building whereby they will start incurring penalties the end of August so we are trying to let
them know our decision as soon as possible. However, he said, it is paramount that Council fully consider
the options and that they have all the information to make a good decision. He said they will try to work
within the timeline the County has requested but we will also ensure that Council has all the information
needed. He said when Council is at the point they feel they are ready to make a decision, staff will make a
recommendation to Council which they can choose to accept, reject, or pursue a different arrangement. If
Council decides to go with one of the options, staff will work on the terms of the contract with the chosen
provider and if we are unable to do so we would have the option of going with the other provider. Mayor
Towey said if Spokane opts not to go regional, all of the numbers we've been given in the SCRAPS
proposal are wiped out. Mr. Koudelka explained the proposal from SCRAPS is a regional model and that
Council Study Session Minutes 07 -31 -12 Page 5 of 7
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
if Spokane chooses not to participate they would revert to the current usage based, settle and adjust
model. Councilmember Wick said he would weigh the six evaluation categories equally.
9. I -Pad Purchases and Use — Gre2 Bingaman
IT Specialist Bingaman said members of Council voiced interest in purchasing I -Pads for use. I -Pads
would be used primarily for agenda packets but have several other features that he demonstrated to
Council. He said the total cost to purchase I -Pads for Council and directors would run between $7,520.72
and $8,950.92 plus $8,712 annually for cellular service. Mayor Towey asked when the current lease for
Council laptops expires and how the cost of the lease compares to purchasing I -Pads. Mr. Bingaman said
he will provide that information to Council. He said he plans to repurpose the current laptops in other
areas, replacing older models. He said we would continue our current lease and purchase I -Pads at the
same time. He said we can't get out of our lease and that we are in our first year of a three -year lease.
Councilmember Grafos said we have an expensive lease and it would cost us $16,000.00 the first year to
purchase I -Pads, accessories and service; therefore, he would decline the I -Pad but thinks it is a good idea
for the directors who need to access information quickly. Councilmember Wick said the cost looks to be
$7,000 to $9,000 and a use for repurposing the laptops has been identified and he said he thinks the
directors would not need I -Pads so that would reduce the number from eleven to seven. He said he
doesn't think Council needs the cellular service because they have cell phones, so that would reduce the
cost as well. Mayor Towey said he has a concern the current laptops would not be utilized if Council
switched to I -Pads. Councilmember Hafner said there are four members of Council who don't use their
laptops now that we are currently spending money for. City Manager Jackson asked if Council wants staff
to continue to research the purchase or drop the topic altogether. Councilmember Woodard said he
doesn't want to spend the money for I -Pads if they won't be utilized. Councilmember Hafner agrees.
Mayor Towey said he would like to get more information about the savings versus cost before making a
decision; no objection from Council. Mr. Bingaman said he will bring more information back to Council
at a future date.
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to extend the meeting one hour. Vote by
acclamation: In Favor: Mayor Towey, Deputy Mayor Schimmels, Councilmembers Grafos, Grassel,
Hafner and Wick. Opposed.- Councilmember Woodard. Motion carried.
10. Economic Development Committee Update — John Hohman
Community Development Director Hohman said the committee has met five times, the first two meetings
were to set the ground rules and the direction and the following three meetings they have been given
presentations by the groups they are researching. He said the first meeting of presentations was sports
related, the second related to tourism, the latest meeting was about river users. He said the committee
decided on four questions to ask each group relating to economic development. He said the next meeting
is this Thursday and it has to do with business and workforce development. He said they plan to have a
couple meetings on land use issues, one focused on city regulations and zoning and another focused on
what larger developers are looking for from our processes. He said the committee would meet again to
determine where the focus should be and will bring that information back to Council for review.
Councilmember Grassel said the purpose of the committee is not to come back to Council with what they
should do, but to provide an exhaustive list of information they gathered to assist Council with future
planning.
11. Advance Aeenda — Mavor Towev
No comments.
12. The Gateway Project, Finance Monthly Report and Sprague Swale Project Update were for
information only and were not reported on or discussed.
13. Council Check -in — Mayor Towey
No comments.
Council Study Session Minutes 07 -31 -12 Page 6 of 7
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
14. City Manager Comments — Mike Jackson
No comments.
15. Executive Session: Labor Negotiations [RCW 42.30.140(4)] and Pending /Potential Litigation
[RCW 42.30.110(1)(i)1
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn into executive
session for approximately forty-five minutes to discuss pending /potential litigation and labor negotiations
and that no action will be taken upon return to open session. Council adjourned into Executive Session at
10:06 p.m. At 10:45pm., City Attorney Driskell announced the meeting was extended fifteen minutes to
11:00 p.m. At 11:00 p.m., City Attorney Driskell announced the meeting was extended fifteen minutes to
11:15 p.m. At 11:15 p.m., City Attorney Driskell announced the meeting was extended fifteen minutes to
11:30 p.m. At 11:30 p.m., Mayor Towey declared Council out of Executive Session and immediately
thereafter, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn.
ATTEST:
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
Thomas E. Towey, Mayor
Council Study Session Minutes 07 -31 -12 Page 7 of 7
Approved by Council:
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: August 14, 2012 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Resolution 12 -004 accepting the City Council Draft Shoreline Goals
and Policies
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Shoreline Management Act (SMA) RCW 90.58.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Numerous discussions regarding local implementation
of the Shoreline Management Act under RCW 90.58.
BACKGROUND: City staff, with the assistance of a Shoreline Advisory Group (SAG),
completed the draft Goals and Policies for the Shoreline Master Program Update in July 2011.
The Planning Commission review was completed over 6 meetings beginning on March 22,
2012. A public hearing was conducted on April 12, 2012, and deliberations were completed on
June 28, 2012. The Commission voted 5 -0 to recommend acceptance of the draft as modified.
Attorney Tadas Kisielius, VanNess Feldman GordonDerr, reviewed the draft and assisted the
Commission with its deliberations. Mr Kisielius attended the July 24th Council meeting to discuss
his review of the draft document and address Council comments. During the discussion staff
was directed to draft a policy that recognized the Centennial Trail as an economic asset and
review the language of policies 5.2 and 12.10 for conflicts. The policies have been redrafted to
eliminate conflict. It is also recommended that language be added to policy 12.10 that further
identifies the circumstances that would allow non - water - oriented commercial development to be
located within shoreline jurisdiction consistent with the Washington Administrative Code (WAC).
The proposed language is provided below, and is included in the attached Draft Goals and
Policies in track changes form.
New policy proposed in the Economic Development element:
SMP 5.8 Economic Assets
Promote the Centennial Trail and Spokane River as a community economic
asset.
Modified €existing policies in Economic Development Element and Shoreline Use Element:
SMP 5.2 Design of Economic Development
Development should be designed to minimize the impacts to the shoreline
aesthetic through architectural, landscape, and other design features_ Give
nreferenne to water_nrienterd ernnnmin 'develnnment while limiting Inn.+tin
GW non shorelinewater oriented rdenenrdent elements of the 'deyelnn,
Encourage design that seeks to restore damaged or compromised
shoreline through incentives.
SMP 5.3 Priorities for Economic Development
Give preference to water oriented economic development, while limiting the
location of non -water oriented elements of the development outside of the
shoreline jurisdiction.
SMP 12.10 Non -Water Oriented Commercial Uses
Prohibit new non -water oriented commercial uses unless they are part of a
mixed -use project, -or the use provides a significant public benefit, such as
public access and ecological restoration, or if the site is physically
separated from the shoreline by another property.
OPTIONS: (1) Approve the attached document as presented; (2) Approve with modifications; (3)
Send the draft back to the Planning Commission; (4) Request additional information from staff.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move to approve Resolution 12 -004 informally
accepting the City Council Draft Recommended Goals and Policies.
BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None
STAFF CONTACT: Lori Barlow, AICP, Senior Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution #12 -004
City Council Draft Goals and Policies August 14, 2012
Please bring the 3 -ring binder on the Shoreline draft Goals and Policies provided at the
July 17th meeting.
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. 12-004
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, ACCEPTING THE DRAFT GOALS AND POLICIES FOR THE
SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM, AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING
THERETO.
WHEREAS, the City initiated a Shoreline Management Program Update process in 2009; and
WHEREAS, on October 27, 2009, the City Council reviewed a public participation plan for the
Shoreline Management Program Update; and
WHEREAS, the public participation plan specifies that a Shoreline Advisory Group be
established to assist staff with development of the Goals and Policies; and
WHEREAS, the Shoreline Management Program Update process specifies that individual
components of Shoreline Management Program Update will be reviewed separately and accepted by
Council resolution, recognizing that as each component is completed, it will be used as a base upon which
to develop the remainder of the Shoreline Management Program; and
WHEREAS, the first component of the Shoreline Master Program Update, the Shoreline
Inventory and Characterization Report, was accepted by Resolution #10 -14; and
WHEREAS, the second component of the Shoreline Master Program Update is the Goals and
Policies; and
WHEREAS, on November 5, 2009, the first Shoreline Master Program Update open house was
conducted where the Shoreline Management Program Update process was explained to interested parties;
and
Vn-IEREAS, the Shoreline Advisory Group met eight times between January 20, 2011 and June
23, 2011 for the purpose of assisting staff with the development of the draft Goals and Policies document;
and
WHEREAS, on March 22, 2012 the Planning Commission conducted a study session where the
Shoreline Advisory Group Draft Goals and Policies were presented and discussed; and
WHEREAS, on March 28, 2012, the Shoreline Advisory Group Draft Goals and Policies were
sent to the Technical Review Group and issued for public review; and
WHEREAS, on April 5, 2012, an open house was conducted where the Draft Goals and Policies
were discussed with interested parties; and
WHEREAS, on April 12, 2012, the Planning Commission conducted a properly noticed public
hearing on the Shoreline Advisory Group Draft Goals and Policies; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered public testimony and written comments and
revised the document to address noted issues and concerns; and
WIMREAS, on June 28, 2012, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended that the
Draft Goals and Policies, as revised by the Planning Commission, be formally accepted; and
Resolution 12 -004, Accepting SMP Goals & Policies Page 1 of 2
WHEREAS, this Resolution informally accepts the proposed Draft Goals and Policies
recommended by the Planning Commission, with minor revisions, and it is anticipated that additional
revisions may occur prior to formal adoption; and
WHEREAS, the City Council Draft Shoreline Goals and Policies are anticipated to be formally
adopted by Ordinance at a later date as a part of the complete Shoreline Master Program.
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane
County, Washington, as follows:
The City Council Draft Shoreline Goals and Policies, attached as Exhibit A, are hereby accepted.
Approved this day of
ATTEST:
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Office of the City Attorney
P111VA
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Thomas E. Towey, Mayor
Resolution 12 -004, Accepting SMP Goals & Policies Page 2 of 2
August CITY COUNCIL DRAFT
General Goals and Policies
Goal SMP 1: Enhance the City's shorelines by establishing and implementing goals, policies, and
regulations which promote a mixture of reasonable and appropriate shoreline uses that improve the
City's character, foster its historic and cultural identity, and conserve environmental resources.
Policies
SW 1.1 Coordinated Planning
Coordinate shoreline planning between the City of Spokane Valley, agencies with jurisdiction, adjoining
jurisdictions, the State of Washington, and the State of Idaho into which the river basin extends, and
consider the plans of non - government organizations (NGO's) and/or special interest groups.
SMP 1.2 Consistency with Other Plans and Programs
Ensure that the City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program is consistent with the Washington State
Shoreline Management Act and Growth Management Act, and to the extent practical the basic concepts,
goals, policies of the following documents: Land use plan of the City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive
Plan development regulations, the City of Spokane Valley Critical Areas Ordinances, and the Shoreline
Master Programs of adjacent jurisdictions.
SNP 1.3 No Net Loss of Ecological Functions
Ensure that all shoreline uses and development are regulated in a manner that assures no net loss of
shoreline ecological functions
SNP 1.4 Public Interest and Property Rights
Balance the interests of the community in attaining the goals of the Shoreline Master Program, in a
manner consistent with all relevant constitutional and other legal limitations on the regulation of private
property.
SMP 1.5 Shoreline Designated Environments
Designate shoreline environments for the City of Spokane Valley shorelines that are consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan land uses, shoreline management practices, and shoreline inventory within each
designated area.
SW 1.6 Use preferences for all Shorelines
Give preference to those shoreline activities which fulfill long range Comprehensive Plan goals and the
Shoreline Management Act policy priorities, as listed and discussed below:
It is the policy of the City to provide for the management of its shorelines by planning for and fostering
all reasonable and appropriate uses. Policies are designed to ensure the development of the City's
shorelines in a manner which will promote and enhance the public interest. These policies will protect
against adverse effects to the public health, the land, its vegetation and aquatic life and wildlife, and the
waters of the Spokane River, Shelly Lake and the Sullivan Road and Park Road Gravel Pits and their
aquatic life.
SMP 1.7 Use preferences for Shorelines of State -wide Significance
The State Legislature has declared that the interest and benefit of all of the people shall be paramount in
the management of shorelines of state -wide significance, and therefore preference shall be given to uses
in the following order of preference which:
1. Recognize and protect statewide interest over local interest
2. Preserve the natural character of the shoreline
City of Spokane Valley I Draft Goals and Policies
August CITY COUNCIL DRAFT
3. Allow uses that result in long -term over short -term benefits
4. Protect the resources and ecology of shorelines
5. Increase public access to publicly owned areas of shorelines
6. Increase recreational opportunities for the public on the shorelines.
SW 1.8 Priority Uses and Shoreline Alterations
Uses shall be preferred which are consistent with control of pollution and prevention of damage to the
natural environment, or are unique to or dependent upon use of the state's shoreline. Alterations of the
natural condition of the shorelines of the state, in those limited instances when authorized, shall be given
priority for single - family residences and their appurtenant structures, shoreline recreational uses and other
improvements facilitating public access, industrial and commercial developments which are particularly
dependent on their location on or use of the shorelines, and other development.
Historical, Cultural, Scientific & Educational Element
Goal SMP 2: Goal: Protect the historic, cultural, scientific or educational sites within the
shoreline that reflect our community's unique heritage and create or contribute to our collective
sense of place.
Policies
SW 2.1 Sites and Structures
Identify, preserve, and manage shoreline sites and structures having historical, cultural, scientific or
educational value, and develop regulations that avoid, minimize, or mitigate any adverse impacts to
these resources.
SW 2.2 Sites and Building Acquisition
Public acquisition through gifts, bequests, grants, or donations of buildings or sites having cultural,
scientific, educational, or historical value should be encouraged.
SMP 2.3 Cooperation and Consultation
Ensure constant cooperation and consultation with
potentially impact cultural and historical resources.
affected agencies and tribes for projects that could
SMP 2.4 Inventory of Sites
Work with tribal, state, federal and local governments as appropriate to maintain an inventory of all
known significant local historic, cultural, and archaeological sites in observance of applicable state and
federal laws protecting such information from public disclosure.
SNP 2.5 Site Inspection and Evaluation
Ensure early and continuous site inspection, consultation or evaluation by a professional archaeologist in
coordination with affected tribes for all permits issued in areas documented to contain archaeological
resources.
Utilities Element
Goal SMP 3: Maintain and provide adequate utility services within the shoreline environment
while preserving and enhancing the natural environment and ecology of the shoreline.
City of Spokane Valley I Draft Goals and Policies
August CITY COUNCIL DRAFT
Policies
SMP 3.1 Location
Locate new public facilities and utilities, including, but not limited to, utility production, processing,
distribution, and transmission facilities outside of the shoreline jurisdiction whenever feasible.
SMP 3.2 Place Underground
Require new utilities and facilities that must be located within the shoreline to be built underground, if
feasible, and utilize low impact, low profile design and construction methods to the maximum extent
possible. Undergrounding shall not be required if it results in a net loss of shoreline ecological functions.
SW 3.3 Existing Rights -of -way
Require new utilities and facilities to be located in existing rights -of -way whenever possible.
SMP 3.4 Maintenance and Operation Design
When existing utilities, facilities and rights of ways are located within shoreline jurisdiction and require
maintenance or other improvements, the maintenance /improvement should be designed and implemented
to minimize additional impacts on the shoreline environment and encouraged to correct past impacts
caused by the utility. Vegetation Management Plans should be recognized as maintenance activities.
SMP 3.5 Preference to Existing Facilities and Utilities
Give preference to established utility corridors and rights -of -way for upgrades, maintenance and
reconstruction of existing utilities and facilities, unless a location with less potential to impact the
shoreline environment is available.
SMP 3.6 Stormwater Facilities
Stormwater utilities will be designed and located as to minimize environmental impacts within the
shoreline jurisdiction. If located within the shoreline jurisdiction they shall use best management practices
(e.g. biofiltration measures) and landscaping with native vegetation. All stormwater facilities must
protect water quality, manage runoff and address erosion control and sedimentation.
Circulation Element
Goal SW 4: Provide a safe, convenient, and multimodal circulation system which will minimize
negative impacts to the shoreline environment
Policies
SW 4.1 Transportation Access
Ensure that a system of arterials, scenic drives, pathways, public transit routes, and bikeways adjacent to
and within the shoreline areas provide appropriate access to the Spokane River in a way that meets the
needs and desires of the community as reflected in the Comprehensive Plan, while also assuring no net
loss of ecological function of the shorelines.
SMP 4.2 Location of New Streets or Street Expansions
Locate new streets or street expansions outside of the shoreline jurisdiction, unless no other options are
available or feasible. In all cases, streets should be on the landward side of development.
SW 4.3 Consolidation of Corridors
Encourage the consolidation of transportation and utility corridors crossing the shoreline environment in
order to minimize the number of crossings, and encourage the collocation of utilities on bridges or in
transportation rights of way whenever possible by considering the needs during the design of bridge and
corridor upgrades.
City of Spokane Valley I Draft Goals and Policies
kueust 14. 2012 ' CITY COUNCIL DRAFT
SMP 4.4 Transportation Facilities
Plan, locate, and design proposed transportation facilities where routes will have the least possible
adverse effect on shoreline ecological functions, will not result in a net loss of shoreline ecological
functions, or adversely impact existing or planned water dependent uses.
SMP 4.5 Stormwater Treatment
All development within the shoreline jurisdiction area shall provide stormwater treatment for all new and
redeveloped pollution generating impervious surfaces.
SMP 4.6 Parking Facilities for Public Access
Parking facilities for public access to the shoreline and water should be kept as far from the shorelines as
feasible
SMP 4.7 Parking Facilities not a Primary Use.
Parking facilities should only be allowed as necessary to support permitted shoreline uses, and not as a
primary use, and must be located outside of the shoreline jurisdiction area if other options are available
and feasible.
SMP 4.8 Impacts of Parking Facilities
Minimize the environmental and visual impacts of parking facilities where allowed.
SMP 4.9 Retain Unused Public Rights -of -way for Visual and Physical Access
Retain unused public rights -of -way within the shoreline area to provide visual and physical access to the
shoreline unless:
• The street vacation enables the City to acquire the property for beach or water access
purposes, boat moorage or launching sites, park, public view, recreation, or educational
purposes, or other public uses or the City declares that the street or alley is not presently
being used and is not suitable for the above purposes; or
• The street vacation enables the City to implement a plan, that provides comparable or
improved public access to the same shoreline area to which the streets or alleys sought to be
vacated, had the properties included in the plan not been vacated.
SMP 4.10 Improve Non - Motorized Access to Shoreline
Improve non - motorized access to the shoreline by developing, where appropriate, pathways, trails and
bikeways along and adjacent to the shoreline. Connectivity between non - motorized access points is
encouraged.
SMP 4.11 Recognition of Centennial Trail
Recognize the importance and uniqueness of the Spokane River Centennial Trail to the City of Spokane
Valley, the region, and the state. Future trail development on private property including trail extensions,
new access points, whether public or private, shall be designed to have the least adverse impact. Future
trail development on public property shall meet the same objective, but should also incorporate
enhancement and restoration measures where appropriate.
SMP 4.12 New Rail Lines
Allow new rail lines and the expansion of existing rail corridors within the shoreline jurisdiction only for
the purpose of connecting to existing rail lines or rights -of -way. Construct new rail lines within an
existing rail corridor where possible.
City of Spokane Valley I Draft Goals and Policies m
August CITY COUNCIL DRAFT
SW 4.13 Rail Lines affecting Public Access
Construct, where feasible, all new rail lines so that they do not compromise the public's ability to access
the shoreline safely.
Economic Development Element
Goal SMP 5: Encourage and support water dependent, water oriented, and water related economic
activities within the shorelands of the City of Spokane Valley that will be an asset to the economy of
the area and that will protect and maintain the ecological functions of the shoreline environment.
Policies
SMP 5.1 Location of Economic Development
Give preference to economic development within the shoreline jurisdiction that is particularly dependent
on their location on or use of the shoreline. Encourage new development to locate in areas that have
intensive prior use and can be upgraded or redeveloped. Encourage new economic development to cluster
into areas of the shoreline whose current use is compatible.
SMP 5.2 Design of Economic Development
Development should be designed to minimize the impacts to the shoreline aesthetic through architectural,
landscape, and other design features. Give preference to water - oriented economic developmente
limiting leeation ef non watef efiented elements ef the development outside of the sher-elitie jefisdietien
ebjeetives of th- Shlifle Management Aet, Encourage design that seeks to restore damaged or
compromised shoreline through incentives.
SMP 5.3 Priorities for Economic Development
Give preference to water oriented economic development, while limiting the location of non -water
oriented elements of the development outside of shoreline jurisdiction.
SMP 5.34 Provisions for Physical and Visual Availability to Water
When public access is required under this SMP, historic areas, overlook points, structures, and points of
public access to the waterfront should be incorporated in economic development site - planning.
SMP 5.45 Encourage Regional Tourism
Strengthen regional tourism by expanding and developing neighborhood and regional linkages and
improvements that use the shoreline areas.
SMP 5.456 Consistency with Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations
Proposed economic development in the shoreline should be consistent with the City of Spokane Valley
Comprehensive Plan and development regulations. Upland uses on adjacent lands outside of immediate
SMA jurisdiction (in accordance with RCW 90.58.340) should protect the preferred shoreline uses from
being impacted by incompatible uses.
SNP 5.67 Provisions for Shoreline Protection
Require that development provide adequate provisions for the protection of water quality, erosion control,
landscaping, aesthetic characteristics, stormwater systems, fish and wildlife habitat, views, archaeological
sites, and normal public use of the water.
SMP 5.8 Economic Assets
Promote the Centennial Trail and Spokane River as a communitv economic asset.
City of Spokane Valley I Draft Goals and Policies
August CITY COUNCIL DRAFT
SMP 5.79 Promote Recreational Uses
Promote recreational uses of the shorelines to contribute to the economic attractiveness of the city. Seek
opportunities to partner with public and private property owners to increase public recreational
opportunities in the shoreline.
SW 5.810 Water- Enjoyment Areas
Promote The identification and establishment of water - enjoyment areas, such as parks, view points,
beaches and pathways as attractions.
SMP 5.311 Business and Industry Operations
Encourage shoreline industries and businesses to maintain a well kept appearance and to operate in a
manner that will not cause negative aesthetic impacts to the community.
SMP 5.182 Redevelopment
Encourage and provide incentives for redevelopment of existing sites that includes points of public
access, areas designed for public enjoyment, and improve fish and wildlife habitat.
SMP 5.1 -13 Building Orientation
New public shoreline uses and developments should be planned and designed to attract the public to the
waterfront; new private shoreline uses and development should be planned and designed to attract the
public to the waterfront with exceptions as allowed by WAC 173- 26- 221(4)(d).
SMP 5.124 Design Feature Incentives
Incentives should be created to encourage developers to incorporate design features into the waterside of
the building.
SMP 5.135 Mining Industry
Support the existing aggregate mining industry as a significant component of the area economy.
Conservation
Goal SNIP 6: Preserve for the future those natural resources, including the unique, fragile and
scenic qualities of the shoreline, which cannot be replaced. Assure no net loss of ecological functions
of the shoreline.
Policies:
SMP 6.1 Protect Vegetative Buffers and Setbacks
Protect existing vegetation and shoreline ecological function by designating buffers and setbacks that are
supported by the 2010 Shoreline Inventory and allow for the use of innovative techniques and strategies
while assuring no net loss of ecological functions.
SMP 6.2 Acquisition of Unique Shoreline Areas
Acquire and maintain, through conservation futures, donations, grants, general funds, or other sources,
shoreline areas containing natural elements especially worthy of preservation or especially attractive to
the public, such as beaches, forest covers, trees, wildlife populations, vistas and other scenic features.
SMP 6.3 Baselines for Functions and Values
Utilize 2010 shoreline inventory to establish baselines for the functions and values of shoreline. Property
owners may provide additional information to supplement the inventory in preparation of a development
proposal.
City of Spokane Valley I Draft Goals and Policies
• CITY COUNCIL DRAFT
SNP 6.4 Preserve Ecological Connectivity
Assure no net loss of ecological viability and connectivity through use of habitat islands and corridors
within the shoreline area.
SMP 6.5 Incentives for Retention of Critical Areas and Open Space
Retain existing open space and environmentally sensitive areas on private property through the use of
incentives.
SMP 6.6 Mitigation of Negative Impacts
Development shall avoid and if avoidance is not possible, mitigate negative impacts to steep banks,
surface and ground water quality, ecological functions, fish and wildlife habitat, vegetative cover, and
erosion of the soil.
SMP 6.7 Cumulative Impacts
Regulations shall assure that the commonly occurring and foreseeable cumulative impacts of development
do not cause a net loss of ecological functions of the shoreline.
Restaratinn
Goal SMP 7: Restore habitat and the natural systems to improve shoreline ecological functions.
SNIP 7.1 Restoration Plan
Develop a Restoration Plan that will identify degraded areas and provide a framework for restoration
efforts to improve the existing ecological function and provide a mechanism for mitigation of unavoidable
and unforeseeable future development.
SW 7.2 City Stewardship
Ensure that the City of Spokane Valley assumes a primary stewardship role through restoration efforts on
city -owned and controlled land. Manage the City's programs, services, and operational infrastructure in a
manner that assures no net loss of ecological or shoreline functions.
SMP 7.3 Incentives for Restoration and Enhancement Projects
Provide incentives for projects that include restoration and enhancement components by implementing
tools which may include but are not limited to: modifying the shoreline setback area that would apply to
the restored areas or allowing a greater range of uses or flexible development standards (e.g., setbacks) on
properties providing restoration and or enhancement that may result in a net gain of ecological function.
SMP 7.4 Gravel Pit Restoration Plans
Assist the Gravel Pits in the development and implementation of restoration plans for pits that are
consistent with the Shoreline Master Program and the Department of Natural Resources.
SW 7.5 Cooperative Restoration Programs
Encourage cooperative restoration programs between local, state, and federal public agencies, tribes, non-
profit organizations, and landowners.
Critical Areas Element
Goal SMP 8: Assure no net loss of ecological functions and ecosystem -wide processes within
wetlands, critical aquifer recharge areas, fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, geologically
City of Spokane Valley I Draft Goals and Policies
August CITY COUNCIL DRAFT
hazardous areas and frequently flooded areas. Assure no net loss of ecological function within
these critical areas.
Policies
SNIP 8.1 Consistency with Critical Areas Goals and Policies
To the extent practicable and consistent with RCW 36.70A.480 ensure the critical area goals and policies
for the Shoreline Master Plan are consistent with the critical areas goals and policies contained in the
Comprehensive Plan.
SW 8.2 No net loss of ecological function
Ensure regulatory protection measures developed for the shoreline area assure no net loss of shoreline
ecological functions necessary to sustain shoreline natural resources as defined by Washington State
Department of Ecology guidelines adopted pursuant to RCW 90.58.060
SMP 8.3 Preserve and protect critical areas defined as Wetlands through protective measures.
Rate wetlands based on the quality of the wetland and the ecological function they serve. Develop
protective measures tailored to the wetland quality and function and that consider the characteristics and
setting of the buffer and the impacts on adjacent land use.
SMP 8.4 Preserve and protect critical areas defined as Wetlands through mitigation measures.
Base wetland mitigation on the wetland rating and require mitigation sequencing. Only allow
compensatory mitigation after mitigation sequencing has been applied and avoidance has been deemed
infeasible.
SNIP 8.5 Protect people and property from risk associated with critical areas defined as
Geologically Hazardous Areas.
Limit development that would cause foreseeable risk from geological conditions to people or property.
Do not allow development that will require structural shoreline stabilization except in the limited cases
where it is necessary to protect an allowed use and no alternative location is available. Allow structural
shoreline stabilization to protect existing structures only when relocation or reconstruction is infeasible.
Do not allow structural shoreline stabilization that will result in a net loss of ecological function.
SNIP 8.6 Preserve and protect critical areas defined as Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation
areas
Develop measures that assure no net loss of ecological functions of river, lake and stream corridors
associated with fish and wildlife habitat. Integrate the protection of fish and wildlife habitat with flood
hazard reduction and other fish and wildlife management provisions. Develop measures that authorize
and facilitate habitat restoration projects.
SNIP 8.7 Preserve and protect critical areas defined as Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas.
Protect the hydrologic connections between water bodies, water courses, and associated wetlands.
Integrate the protection of critical aquifer recharge areas with jurisdictional and non jurisdictional aquifer
protection measures such as Watershed Management Plans, Wellhead Protection Plans, Department of
Natural Resources Forest Practices, and others as appropriate.
SMP 8.8 Protect people and property from risk associated with critical areas defined as Frequently
Flooded Areas
Limit development that would cause foreseeable risk to people and property from frequent flooding.
Ensure frequently flooded areas are fully addressed in the goals and policies of the Flood Hazard
Reduction element of this plan.
City of Spokane Valley I Draft Goals and Policies
August CITY COUNCIL DRAFT
Flood Hazard Reduction Element
Goal SMP 9: Prevent and reduce flood damage in shoreline areas to protect ecological functions,
shoreline habitat, lives, and public and private property.
Policies
SMP 9.1 Development within the Shoreline
Prohibit development within the shorelines that would intensify flood hazards or result in cumulative
significant adverse effects to other properties, as regulated by Chapter 21.30, Floodplain Regulations, of
the Spokane Valley Municipal Code.
SMP 9.2 Coordination among agencies
Coordinate flood hazard reduction planning among the applicable agencies.
SMP 9.3 Structural Flood Hazard Reduction
Allow new structural flood hazard reduction measures only:
• Where scientific and engineering analysis has demonstrated it to be necessary, and when non-
structural methods are infeasible and mitigation is accomplished; and
• Landward of associated wetlands and buffer areas except where no alternative exists, as
documented in an engineering analysis; and
• When consistent with current best management practices, using natural native materials
whenever feasible.
Note: An example of a structural flood hazard reduction measure is a structure placed by humans within
a stream or river waterward of the ordinary high mark such as, but not limited to a diversion or
modification of water flow to control flooding.
SMP 9.4 Removal of Gravel
Allow removal of gravel for flood control only if biological and geomorphological study demonstrates
that extraction has a long -term benefit to flood hazard reduction, does not result in a net loss of ecological
functions, and is part of a comprehensive flood management solution. This does not apply to the
permitted gravel mining operations underway at the time of SMP adoption and approval.
SMP 9.5 Natural Vegetative Buffers
Maintain, protect, and restore natural vegetative buffers that are within the floodplain of the Spokane
River that function to reduce flood hazards.
SMP 9.6 Alternate Flood Control Measures
When evaluating alternate flood control measures consider the removal or relocation of structures in
floodplain areas.
Public Access Element
Goal SMP 10: Provide diverse, reasonable, and adequate public access to the shorelines of the state
consistent with the natural shoreline character, private property rights, public rights under the
Public Trust Doctrine, and public safety while assuring no net loss of ecological function.
SMP 10.1 Public Interest and Private Property
Promote and enhance the public interest with regard to rights to access waters held in public trust by the
state, while protecting private property rights and public safety.
City of Spokane Valley I Draft Goals and Policies •
• CITY COUNCIL DRAFT
SMP 10.2 Shoreline Development by Public Entities
Require public entities, including local governments, state agencies and public utility districts, to include
public access as part of each development project unless such access is incompatible due to reasons of
safety, security or impact to the shoreline environment.
SMP 10.3 Shoreline Development
Require the dedication and improvement of public access in developments for water - enjoyment, water -
related and non water - dependent uses and for the subdivision of land into more than four parcels, with
exceptions as allowed by WAC 173- 26- 221(4)(d)(iii).
SMP 10.4 Public Access Maintenance and Improvements
When improving and maintaining existing public access points, minimize additional impacts on the
shoreline environment and, so long as it is consistent with constitutional protections, correct past adverse
environmental impacts caused by the public access.
SMP 10.5 Access Plan
Develop a formal Public Access Plan for an integrated shoreline area public access system that identifies
specific public needs and opportunities to provide public access that includes visual and physical access.
The plan should identify access opportunities and circulation for pedestrians (including disabled persons),
bicycles, and vehicles between shoreline access points.
SMP 10.6 Design of Access Measures
Require that public access measures have a design appropriate to the site, adjacent property, and general
nature of the proposed development, while protecting and providing views. Public access facilities
should be designed with provisions for persons with disabilities, where appropriate.
SMP 10.7 Motor Vehicle Access
Where access to the water's edge by motor vehicles is necessary, parking areas should be kept as far from
the shorelines as possible. Parking facilities shall implement a design appropriate for the shoreline
environment.
SW 10.8 Access Design and Spacing
Access design and spacing of access points should be based on the biophysical capabilities of the
shoreline features and should protect fragile shoreline environment.
SMP 10.9 Impacts on Views
Minimize the impacts to existing views where the view is taken from the water or shoreline, public
property or substantial numbers of residences. Water- dependent shoreline uses and physical public access
shall have priority over maintaining a view when a conflict between them is irreconcilable provided that
the water dependent use is consistent with height restrictions in RCW 90.58.320.
SMP 10.10 Permitted Uses
Regulate the design, construction, and operation of permitted uses in the shorelines of the state to
minimize, insofar as practical, interference with the public's use of the water.
SMP 10.11 Incentives
Incentives such as density or bulk and dimensional bonuses should be considered if development
proposals include additional public access beyond that required by this SMP.
City of Spol<ane Valley I Draft Goals and Policies
August CITY COUNCIL DRAFT
SW 10.12 Non - Motorized Access
Preference shall be given to the development, or improvement, of access for non - motorized recreational
activities.
Recreation Element
Goal SMP 11: Increase and preserve recreational opportunities on the shorelines of the City of
Spokane Valley
Policies
SMP 11.1 Preserve Shorelines for Public Recreational Use
Encourage appropriate public agencies to preserve shorelines for public use and to dedicate or transfer
appropriate shoreline land for recreational uses.
SMP 11.2 Encourage Passive and Active Recreation
Both passive and active recreation should be encouraged for appropriate shorelines.
SMP 11.3 Recreational Areas Protect Shoreline Ecological Functions
Recreational areas should be located, designed, developed, managed and maintained in a manner that
protects shoreline ecological functions and processes.
SMP 11.4 Linkages to Recreation Areas
Hiking paths, bicycle paths, easements and scenic drives should link shoreline parks, recreation areas and
public access points.
SNP 11.5 Public Access Priority
Public use and access to the water should be a priority in recreational development.
SMP 11.6 Recreational Opportunities for All
Ensure that recreational planning takes into account the differences in use groups, physical capabilities,
and interests among the public in order to provide opportunities for safe and convenient enjoyment of the
shorelines.
SNP 11.7 Adequate Support Facilities
Create adequate support facilities of uses such as parking areas, maintenance buildings, and rest rooms to
meet shoreline recreational demands.
SMP 11.8 Non- Motorized Recreation
Preference shall be given to non - motorized recreational activities.
Shoreline Use Element
Goal SMP 12: Consider the use and development of shorelines and adjacent land areas for housing,
business, industry, transportation, recreation, education, public buildings and grounds, utilities and
other categories of public and private land uses in relation to the natural environment and assuring
no net loss of ecological function.
Policies
General Use Policies
SW 12.1 Shoreline Use Priorities
City of Spokane Valley I Draft Goals and Policies
• CITY COUNCIL DRAFT
Give preference to water - dependent and single family residential uses that are consistent with preservation
of shoreline ecological functions and processes. Secondary preference should be given to water - related and
water - enjoyment uses. Non - water - oriented uses should be allowed only when substantial public benefit is
provided with respect to the goals of the SMA for public access and ecological restoration.
SMP 12.2 Protect Shoreline Ecological Functions
Assure no net loss of ecological functions through the use of specific standards for setbacks, buffers,
density, and shoreline stabilization.
SNIP 12.3 Public Access in Development
Ensure that shoreline development includes visual and physical public access to the shorelines, while
avoiding, minimizing, or mitigating negative impacts to the shoreline including views.
SMP 12.4 Preserving Fish and Wildlife Habitat
Encourage new development to contribute to the creation or preservation of open space and /or fish and
wildlife habitat along the shorelines through the use of tools such as conservation futures, conservations
easements, transferable development rights, and planned unit developments.
SMP 12.5 Nonconforming Use and Development
Legally established uses and developments that were erected and maintained in lawful condition prior to
the effective date of this Master Program, shall be allowed to continue as legal nonconforming uses
provided that future development or redevelopment does not increase the degree of nonconformity with
this program. Expansion, or replacement of pre - existing residential structures and their appurtenant
structures, shall be allowed if it is consistent with the master program, including requirements for no net
loss of shoreline ecological functions.
SMP 12.6 Mitigation Sequencing
Avoid and reduce significant ecological impacts from shoreline uses and modification activities through
mitigation sequencing.
Residential Use
SMP 12.7 Subdivided Lots
Require new subdivided lots to be designed, configured, and developed to:
• Prevent the net loss of ecological functions at full build -out;
• Prevent the need for new shoreline stabilization or flood hazard reduction measures ; and
• Be consistent with the applicable environment designations and standards.
SMP 12.8 Over -Water Residences
Prohibit new over -water residences and floating homes
Commercial Use
SMP 12.9 Priorities for Commercial Use
Give preference to commercial uses in the following order:
• First priority is given to water - dependent commercial uses,
• Second priority is given to water - related and water - enjoyment commercial uses.
SMP 12.10 Non -Water Oriented Commercial Uses
Prohibit new non -water oriented commercial uses unless they are part of a mixed -use project, the use
provides a significant public benefit, such as public access and ecological restoration, or if the site is
physically separated from the shoreline by another property.
City of Spokane Valley I Draft Goals and Policies
• oil CITY COUNCIL DRAFT
SMP 12.11 Non -Water Dependent Commercial Uses
Prohibit non -water dependent commercial uses over the water
SW 12.12 Mitigation of Shoreline Impacts
Public access and ecological restoration collectively should be considered as potential mitigation of
impacts to shoreline resources and values for all water - related or water - dependent commercial
development unless such improvements are demonstrated to be infeasible or inappropriate.
Industrial Uses
SW 12.13 Priorities for Industrial Use
Give priority to industrial uses in the following order:
• First priority is given to water - dependent industrial uses
• Second priority is given to water - related industrial uses
SMP 12.14 Non -Water Oriented Industrial Uses
Allow new non -water oriented industrial uses only if the use includes a water dependent use or
navigability is severely limited at the site, and provides for public access and/or ecological restoration,
or the area is physically separated from the shoreline by another public right of way.
SMP 12.15 Industrial Use in Impaired Shoreline Areas
Encourage industrial uses and redevelopment to locate where environmental cleanup and restoration is
needed and can be accomplished.
SMP 12.16 Water Dependent and Water Related Industrial Uses
Water dependent and water related industrial uses within shoreline jurisdiction should be prohibited in
areas that are susceptible to erosion and flooding and where there are impacts to ecological functions.
SMP 12.17Control Pollution and Damage
Designate and maintain appropriate areas for protecting and restoring shoreline ecological functions and
processes to control pollution and prevent damage to the shoreline environment and/or public health.
SMP 12.18 Uses Consistent with Comprehensive Plan
Ensure shoreline uses are consistent with the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan and satisfy the
economic, social, and physical needs of the city.
Shoreline Modifications
SMP 12 -19 Shoreline Modifications
Allow structural shoreline modifications only where they are:
• Demonstrated to be necessary to support or protect an allowed primary structure or a legally
existing shoreline use that is in danger of loss or substantial damage; and
• Necessary for reconfiguration of the shoreline for mitigation or enhancement purposes.
SMP 12 -20 Modification Impacts and Limitations
Reduce the adverse effects of allowed shoreline modifications and, as much as possible, limit allowed
shoreline modifications in number and extent unless they are necessary to support or protect an allowed
primary structure or a legally existing shoreline use that is in danger of loss or substantial damage or are
necessary for reconfiguration of the shoreline for mitigation or enhancement purposes.
SMP 12 -21 Appropriate Modifications
Allow only shoreline modifications that are appropriate to the shoreline environment designations and
environmental conditions for which they are proposed.
City of Spokane Valley I Draft Goals and Policies
CITY COUNCIL DRAFT
SNIP 12 -22 Modifications and No Net Loss of Ecological Functions
Assure that shoreline modifications individually and cumulatively do not result in a net loss of ecological
functions by:
• Giving preference to those types of shoreline modifications that have the least impact on
ecological function; and
• Requiring mitigation of identified impacts resulting from shoreline modifications.
SNIP 12 -23 Shoreline Modifications Regulations
Base shoreline modification regulations on scientific and technical information of reach conditions for the
Spokane River and Shelley Lake.
SMP 12 -24 Restoration of Impaired Ecological Functions
Plan for the restoration of impaired ecological functions where feasible and appropriate, while
accommodating permitted uses.
SMP 12 -25 Measures to Protect Ecological Functions
Incorporate all feasible measures to protect ecological shoreline functions and ecosystem -wide processes
as shoreline modifications occur.
Piers and Docks
SMP 12 -26 Dock Restrictions
Allow new docks only for public water - dependent uses, single - family residences, and public access on the
Spokane River and Shelley Lake.
SNIP 12 -27 Dock Location
Docks shall be allowed only in locations where they will not pose a public safety hazard or adversely
impact shoreline ecological functions or process and limited as follows:
• Spokane River - only in reservoir areas, where flow conditions least resemble the natural free -
flowing river;
• Shelley Lake; or
• Severely ecologically impacted shoreline areas with adequate public access
SNIP 12 -28 Dock Size
Restrict the size of new docks to the minimum necessary to serve a proposed water - dependent use.
SNIP 12 -29 Demonstrate Need
Permit new docks only when specific need is demonstrated, except for single - family residences.
SNIP 12 -30 Expansion and Multiple Use
Encourage multiple use and expansion of existing docks over the addition and /or proliferation of new
single dock facilities.
SMP 12 -31 Joint Use and Community Docks
Encourage residential development of more than two dwellings to provide community docks, rather than
individual docks.
SNIP 12 -32 Design and Construction
Design and construct all piers and docks to avoid, minimize, and mitigate impacts to ecological processes
and functions.
City of Spokane Valley I Draft Goals and Policies
• CITY COUNCIL DRAFT
Shoreline Fill
SMP 12 -33 Design and Location
Shoreline fills shall be designed, located, and constructed to protect shoreline ecological function and
ecosystem -wide processes, including channel migration, wildlife habitat, water quality, water currents,
surface water drainage, and flood hazard protection measures.
SMP 12 -34 Limitations on Fill
Fill waterward of the Ordinary High Water Mark shall require a conditional use permit and shall only be
allowed under limited circumstances.
SNIP 12 -35 Fill Proposal Plan
Require a plan that addresses species removal, replanting, irrigation, erosion, and sedimentation control
and other methods of riparian corridor protection with all fill proposals.
Streambank Protection
SMP 12 -36 Streambank Protection Measures
The term "streambank" shall apply to all shoreline banks within Spokane Valley. Prohibit new
streambank protection measures, except when necessity is documented through a geotechnical analysis
of the site and shoreline characteristics. When necessity is demonstrated and conditions require, only
allow streambank protection for existing primary structures, water- dependent development, new
development, and ecological restoration or toxic clean -up remediation projects.
SMP 12 -37 Design and Location of New Development
Design and locate new development and lots created through subdivision, particularly those located on
steep slopes and bluffs, to prevent the need for future streambank protection measures during the life of
the structure.
SMP 12 -38 Public Access
Incorporate ecological restoration and public access as part of publicly funded streambank protection
projects.
SNW -12 -39 Integrated Approach to Streambank Protection
Require an integrated approach to streambank protection. Select and design streambank protection
measures using an integrated approach requiring an analysis of the reason for the erosion; fish and
wildlife habitat characteristics, needs and potential; and the current and future risks associated with
erosion and bank protection to property, infrastructure, fish and wildlife habitat and public safety.
SMP 12 -40 Dredging
Site and design new development to avoid the need for new or maintenance dredging.
SMP 12 -41 Dredging Restrictions
Prohibit dredging except when necessary for projects that restore ecological functions and to maintain
existing structures. Dredging is allowed as part of the permitted aggregate mining operations in the
gravel pits.
SMP 12 -42 Dredging Materials
Prohibit the use or disposal of dredging materials within the shoreline except for projects that benefit
shoreline resources and except for permitted aggregate mining operations in the gravel pits.
SMP 12 -43 In- Stream Structures
City of Spokane Valley I Draft Goals and Policies
kueust 14, 2012 ': CITY COUNCIL DRAFT
Site in- stream structures to protect and preserve ecosystem -wide processes, ecological functions, and
cultural resources, including but not limited to fish and fish passage, wildlife and water resources,
shoreline critical areas, hydro - geological processes, and natural scenic vistas.
SNIP 12 -44 In- Stream Structure Location
Consider the full range of public interests, watershed functions and processes, and environmental
concerns when planning and locating in- stream structures, with special emphasis on protecting and
restoring priority habitats and species.
SNIP 12 -45 Boat Ramps and other Boating Facilities
Locate and design boat ramps and other boating facilities to meet health, safety, and welfare requirements
and to minimize adverse affects upon geo- hydraulic processes, fragile shoreline features, natural
wetlands, and aquatic and wildlife habitats.
SNIP 12 -46 Development of Boat Ramps and other Boating Facilities
Assure no net loss of ecological functions as a result of boat ramp or other boating facility development.
SMP 12 -47 Aesthetic Impacts of Boat Ramps and other Boating Facilities
Avoid or mitigate impacts to shoreline aesthetics as a result boat ramp or other boating facility
development.
SNIP -12 -48 Habitat and Natural Systems Enhancement Projects
Advocate and foster habitat and natural system enhancement projects which restore the natural character
and function of the shoreline provided they are consistent with the Restoration Plan.
Gravel Pits
SNW12 -49 Gravel Pit Operations
Existing gravel pit operations may continue to operate and expand consistent with operational permits.
Active gravel pits are not regulated as shorelines of the state until reclamation is complete and DNR
terminates the Surface Mine Reclamation Permit.
City of Spokane Valley I Draft Goals and Policies Ki ..
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: August 14, 2012 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion consideration — Settlement Agreement on law enforcement/jail
interlocal amounts — pre -2010
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 39.34
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Approval of prior law enforcement interlocal
agreement in March, 2003; approval of jail interlocal agreement in July, 2006.
BACKGROUND: The City claims Spokane County overcharged the City for law enforcement
services for 2003 -2009. The County claims the City owes additional funds for those services
beyond what the City has already paid. The parties attempted to resolve this dispute through
mediation, which was unsuccessful. A new law enforcement agreement became effective in
2010, which addresses the source of the original billing dispute. Both parties wish to end the
dispute and relinquish their claims against the other party.
Given this, the parties have discussed entering into an agreement to resolve all financial issues
for the prior law enforcement agreement in effect from 2003 to 2009, and any settle and adjust
issues for the jail contract from 2006 -2009 whereby neither party pays the other any additional
funds.
OPTIONS: (1) Request additional information from staff; or (2) authorize staff to execute the
settlement agreement with Spokane County regarding the 2003 -2009 Law Enforcement
interlocal and the current jail interlocal.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move that we authorize the City Manager to execute
and finalize the "Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release of All Claims With Regard to
Interlocal Agreement for Law Enforcement Services in the City of Spokane Valley (2003 -2009)
and Interlocal Agreement for Jail Services in the City of Spokane Valley (2005- 2009)."
BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: NA
STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney; Kelly Konkright, Consulting Attorney
ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release of All Claims With
Regard to Interlocal Agreement for Law Enforcement Services in the City of Spokane Valley
(2003 -2009) and Interlocal Agreement for Jail Services in the City of Spokane Valley (2005-
2009)
DRAFT
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT and
MUTUAL RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS WITH REGARD TO INTERLOCAL
AGREEMENT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES IN THE CITY OF SPOKANE
VALLEY (2003 -2009) and INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR JAIL SERVICES IN THE
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY (2005 -2009)
I. PARTIES
A. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY (hereinafter "City "), having offices at 11707 East
Sprague Avenue Suite 106, Spokane Valley, Washington.
B. SPOKANE COUNTY and SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF (hereinafter
collectively referred to as the "County ") having offices respectively at 1116 West Broadway
Avenue and 1100 West Mallon, Spokane, Washington.
C. Collectively referred to herein as "Parties ".
II. RECITALS
WHEREAS, the County under Resolution No. 03 -0238 and City under No. CO3 -14
executed a document entitled "Interlocal Agreement for Law Enforcement Services in the City
of Spokane Valley" (hereinafter "former Law Enforcement Agreement ") which terminated on
December 31, 2009, and was replaced by a subsequent agreement of 2010 and beyond; and
WHEREAS, the City claims the County overcharged the City (and the City therefore
overpaid) for services rendered under the former Law Enforcement Agreement for calendar years
2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009; and that such overcharge constitutes a breach of
contract; and
WHEREAS, the County claims the City is obligated under the former Law Enforcement
Agreement to pay additional funds for services rendered beyond that which the City has already
paid; and
WHEREAS, the City denies the County's claim that the City owes the County additional
Page 1 of 5
DRAFT
funds under the former Law Enforcement Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the County denies the City's claim that the County overcharged the City for
services under the former Law Enforcement Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the County under Resolution No. 06 -0674, and City pursuant to a motion
passed by the City Council on July 25, 2006, executed a document entitled "Interlocal
Agreement for Jail Services in the City of Spokane Valley (January 1, 2005- December 31,
2005)" (hereinafter "Jail Services Agreement") which agreement is still in effect; and
WHEREAS, Section No. 5 (Cost of Services and Payments) within the Jail Services
Agreement contains an adjust and settle provision relating to the cost of services under that
agreement on an annual basis. Section No. 5 within the Jail Services Agreement is related to the
Parties respective claims under the former Law Enforcement Agreement for calendar years 2006-
2009 only. The Parties have not adjusted and settled under Section No. 5 of the Jail Services
Agreement for calendar years 2006 -2009; and
WHEREAS, the Parties stipulate that their respective claims as they relate to the former
Law Enforcement Agreement constitute bona fide disputes; and
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to settle their respective claims regarding the former Law
Enforcement Agreement as well as the adjust and settle under Section No. 5 (Cost of Services
and Payments) within the Jail Services Agreement for calendar years 2006 -2009 only.
The Parties hereby enter into the following Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release of
Claims.
III. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
For and in sole consideration of the above recitals which are adopted herein and Parties'
Mutual Release of Claims, the terms of which are set forth below and which each Party hereby
Page 2 of 5
DRAFT
stipulates constitutes valuable consideration, the Parties agree that the Parties' claims under the
former Law Enforcement Agreement as recited above as well as the adjust and settle under
Section No. 5 (Cost of Services and Payments) within the Jail Services Agreement for calendar
years 2006 -2009 only as recited above are hereby settled.
This Settlement Agreement and the Mutual Release of Claims are limited to claims under
the former Law Enforcement Agreement as recited above and claims under the adjust and settle
under Section No. 5 (Cost of Services and Payments) within the Jail Services Agreement for
calendar years 2006 -2009 only as recited above but specifically exclude Section No. 10
(LIABILITY) within the former Law Enforcement Agreement associated with third party claims.
The Settlement Agreement does not have any legal effect or relation to the current
agreement for law enforcement services which was entered into on August 18, 2010, with an
effective date of January 1, 2010.
The Settlement Agreement does not have any legal effect or relation to the Jail Services
Agreement except for the adjust and settle under Section No. 5 (Cost of Services and Payments)
within the Jail Services Agreement for calendar years 2006 -2009 only.
IV. MUTUAL RELEASE OF CLAIMS
FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of this Mutual Release, receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, the City and County hereby release each other and forever discharge each other,
the heirs, successors and assigns of all Parties, and any and all other persons, firms, and
corporations, whether or not herein named or referred to, and their respective heirs, legal
representatives, successors and assigns, of and from any and all claims, demands, or causes of
action, damages, costs, loss of services, expenses, compensation, and all consequential damages
arising out of or as a result of alleged damages sustained by either party with regard to the former
Page 3 of 5
DRAFT
Law Enforcement Agreement and the adjust and settle under Section No. 5 (Cost of Services
and Payments) within the Jail Services Agreement for calendar years 2006 -2009 only. This
release does not include Section No. 10 (LIABILITY) within the former Law Enforcement
Agreement associated with third party claims.
It is expressly agreed and understood that the consideration received is not, and is not to
be construed as an admission on the part of either party of any liability whatsoever in connection
with the compensation and alleged damages, but that said consideration is in compromise and is
in settlement of claims which are disputed by them.
This Mutual Release shall forever settle, adjust, and discharge all claims of the Parties
with regard to the former Law Enforcement Agreement and the adjust and settle under Section
No. 5 (Cost of Services and Payments) within the Jail Services Agreement for calendar years
2006 -2009 only, whether known or unknown unless otherwise provided herein.
The Parties declare that they have read the above, obtained the advice of counsel, and that
they understand and agree to the provisions herein stated.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Settlement Agreement and the
Mutual Release of Claims to be executed on the day and year opposite their respective signature block.
DATED: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Page 4 of 5
MIKE JACKSON, City Manager
DRAFT
SPOKANE COUNTY:
DATED:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF SPOKANE, COUNTY, WASHINGTON
TODD MIELKE, Chair
MARK RICHARD, Vice Chair
AL FRENCH, Commissioner
ATTEST:
Daniela Erickson, Clerk of the Board
SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF
DATED:
LM
Page 5 of 5
OZZIE KNEZOVICH, Sheriff
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: August 14, 2012 Department Director Approval: ❑
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Library District Update
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND: January 10, 2012, Library Board of Trustees Chair Tim Hattenburg gave a
presentation to Council on the Library Facilities Master Plan.
Library Executive Director Nancy Ledeboer and Board of Trustees Chair Tim Hattenburg will
give an update to that presentation.
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT:
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Updated PowerPoint presentation
2. January 10, 2012 previous presentation
Library Facilities Master Plan
Adopted by Board of Trustees in 2010
Key Findings
+Libraries are too small and too noisy
+Need more quiet reading and study areas
+Not enough books, audiobooks and DVDs
+Need more computers
+Need more comfortable seating
SPOKANE COUNTY
2 LIBRARY
�r DISTRICT
Overall Recommendations
+Replace Spokane Valley Library
+Replace North Spokane Library
+Expand and renovate seven community libraries
+Build two new libraries to serve Spokane Valley
+Expand and remodel admin /support services
SPOKANE COUNTY
3 LIBRARY
P1,611 DISTRICT
Timeline
+Three -phase implementation to be completed
over 20 years
+Anticipate 2014 -15 as earliest election date
+All projects completed by 2025 -2026
+Oriainal timeline and recommendations did not
v
anticipate the current economy
SPOKANE COUNTY
4 LIBRARY
P1,611 DISTRICT
Future Libraries for Spokane Valley
Current
+Spokane Valley
Library — a stand
alone library with
22,950 sq ft on three
floors
+Built in 1955
+ Remodeled and
expanded 1986 &
1988
5
Proposed*
+Sprague Library —
one floor 30,000 sq ft
+Conklin Library
15,000 sq ft
+South Valley Library
15,000 sq ft
(Total of 60,000 sq ft)
*Revised 2012
SPOKANE COUNTY
LIBRARY
e, 9 DISTRICT
Sprague Library
+Proposed partnership
+Combines park with
library
+30,000 sq ft one story
+Large meeting room
+Programming room
+Study rooms
+Conference room
+Collection space SPOKANE COUNTY
6 LIBRARY
P11,61 DISTRICT
Conklin Library
+District own 2.5 acres
on Conklin near
Sprague
+ 15,000+ sq ft
+Large meeting room
+Programming room
+Information commons
+Study rooms
r, It
l
t
f
:Rd
0-
A.
+Collection
SPOKANE COUNTY
LIBRARY
DISTRICT
Future South Valley Library
+Exploring sites south
of 32nd between
University and
Sullivan
+Need minimum of 2.5
acres
+ 15,000+ sq ft
--------------- --
+Comparable to
Conklin Library
E'
SPOKANE COUNTY
LIBRARY
��� DISTRICT
Proposed Partnership with Park
+Library Board approved the Inter -local
Agreement to purchase property on Sprague
+Revised plan for the size of the building based
upon Traffic Study, service needs and required
parking
+One story provides greater efficiency and
sustainable operating costs
+Assumes successful bond issue election by
2015 to fund capital costs
SPOKANE COUNTY
9 LIBRARY
e, 9 DISTRICT
Strategic Planning
+District is developing a Strategic Plan to guide
services over the next 3 -5 years
+Board of Trustees will review the Master
Facilities Plan in light of the current economy
and strategic goals and objectives
+Plan will take into account intention to present a
capital bond issue to the voters by 2015
+Plan will account for reducing the size of the
Sprague Library and increasing size of Conklin
and South Valley libraries
SPOKANE COUNTY
10 LIBRARY
e, 9 DISTRICT
Ready to Move Forward
+Board approved mid -year budget modifications
allocating funds to purchase Sprague property
+Board approved Inter -local Agreement
+District staff are prepared to begin working on a
site plan with City of Spokane Valley staff
+Questions?
SPOKANE COUNTY
11 LIBRARY
�� DISTRICT
Library
Facilities
Library Facilities Blaster Plan
-- Adopted by Board of Trustees in 2010
-- Based on community needs assessment
Key Findings
— Libraries are too small and too noisy
Quiet reading and study areas needed
Not enough books, audiobooks, and
DVDs
Not enough computers
— Not enough comfortable seating
--- Guides short and long term facility
planning
— Plan prioritizes improvements
® Three phases
— 20 -year planning horizon
• Relocate & replace 3 branches
• Add 3 new branches
• Expand & remodel 6 branches
• Expand & remodel support services
-- $50.8 million (2010 $) bond funding
-- 2014 -2015 earliest election date
— All projects completed by 20252026
i.N �A �fl
J k � I" i
��V, AII!'
• New Branch: Conklin Rd
— 12,000 square feet
— Single floor
• Phase 2
Land already owned
— Approximately two acres
— East side of Conklin Road,
just South of Sprague
L
'6kane
3p
New Branch: South
12,000 square feet
Single floor
Land not yet acquired
Need Approximately two
Ideally along the Pines Rd
& 32nO Ave axis
cane
F'Valle .
f ,
I � Ire' � ' i ' � i♦.
I
• Replace Spokane Valley
Library
-- 50,000 square feet
— 2 floors
— 200 seat auditorium
— 2 conference rooms
— 5 quiet study rooms
— 242 parking spaces
• Phase 1
• Site not yet acquired
— Need approximately four acres
— Ideally on the Sprague Avenue
corridor axis between
University and Pines Roads
1 ,
1
I ;
I
I
1
i -
i
I.
'
`{f IIS IX
.;.0 VaI ley
• Approximate cost for City of Spokane Valley
projects
— $25,768,000 of the $50,801,000 District -wide total [2010
dollars]
• Timeline
— Assumes successful early 2015 bond issue election
— Phase 1: 2015 -2018
• Design, build, open Spokane Valley Library replacement
— Phase 2: 2017 -2022
• Design, build, open new Conklin Road Library
• Design, build, open new South Valley Library
Spokane
Val ley
® Location
-- Ideally on the Sprague Avenue corridor
axis between Dartmouth and Pines Roads
-- Possibly as far north as Broadway or as far
south as 4th
— On arterial
-- Zoning not an issue for a public library
• Site size requirements
-- Approximately 4 acres, depending
on parcel configuration
— Significant parking requirements +
landscaping
9 other factors
— Compatible adjacent uses
-- Easy left turn to parking
-- Prefer vacant land to purchasing
structure and razing
Site identification and
evaluation
Representation agreement
with NAI /Black (Grant Person
& Mike King) to...
Research potential sites
Evaluate suitability
Provide acquisition cost estimates
Researched 19 potential
Narrowed down to 4
Top choice is west half of 8+ acres
at Sprague & Herald owned by
the Pring Corporation
• Pring Corporation property
-- Location meets SCLD site
criteria
— Vacant land
— In addition, adjacent to
park (Balfour)
— However, only west half of
property needed
— Owner is firm about selling
only entire site and for
cash —no financing or
contingencies
-- SCLD can't purchase entire
8+ acre's
t
raw
i ►.°
i ,Ei
• Proposal
— City of Spokane Valley and Spokane County Library
District discuss joint purchase of entire 8+ acres
• SCLD use west half for library
• City of Spokane Valley use east half to expand Balfour Park
• Joint site planning and development to maximize public use of
the property
• Interlocal Agreement for terms of joint purchase. including
financial
• Probably second Interlocal Agreement regarding joint site
planning and development
— If City Council interested in pursuing, staff could
begin to work out details of purchase offer and
Interlocal Agreements for future Council and SCLD
Board of Trustees consideration
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: August 14, 2012
Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Estimated 2013 revenues and expenditures.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: State budget law.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: No formal Council action has been taken on the 2013
Budget. A proposed budget is currently under review by the City Manager who will present his
Preliminary 2013 Budget to the Council on September 11, 2012.
BACKGROUND: This marks the second occasion where the Council has discussed the 2013
Budget. The first occurred during the June 12, 2012 Council Retreat where the Council
reviewed 2013 Budget worksheets prepared by Staff. By the time the Council is scheduled to
adopt the 2013 Budget on October 23, 2012, you will have had an opportunity to discuss it on
eight separate occasions, including three public hearings to gather input from citizens:
• June 12 Council Budget Retreat
• August 14 Admin report: Estimated 2013 revenues and expenditures
• August 28
Public hearing #1 on 2013 revenues and expenditures
• September 11
City Manager's presentation of preliminary 2013 Budget
• September 25
Public hearing #2 on 2013 Budget
• October 9
Public hearing #3 on 2013 Budget
• October 9
First reading on ordinance adopting the 2013 Budget
• October 23
Second reading on ordinance adopting the 2013 Budget
State law requires that the City hold a public hearing on revenue sources for the upcoming
year's budget in order to consider input from the public. This hearing is scheduled to take place
on August 28t ". The presentation this evening is an administrative report leading up to the
public hearing. All of the figures currently included in the 2013 Budget worksheets are
preliminary and subject to change by the City Manager until his September 11 presentation of
the 2013 Budget. In summary:
• The 2013 Budget currently includes appropriations of $53,189,350 including $7,980,400 in
capital expenditures.
• Budgets will be adopted across 21 separate funds.
• The full time equivalent employee (FTE) count will decrease by 2.0 employees from 87.25 in
2012 to 85.25 in 2013.
Pertaining specifically to the General Fund:
• The 2013 recurring revenue estimate of $35,232,900 is $324,100 or 0.93% greater than the
2012 budget of $34,908,800.
• The 2013 recurring expenditure proposal prior to adding a pavement preservation
component is $34,235,677 or $424,723 (1.22 %) less than the 2012 appropriation of
$34,660,400.
• To the $34,235,677 is added $855,857 for total recurring expenditures of $35,091,534. This
now represents a $431,134 or 1.24% increase over the 2012 appropriation of $34,660,400.
IkSV- FS21UsersVncelhoun lBudgets120131RCAs and Intros and PwrPnt presentationsi2012 08 14 RCA Est 2013 rev and exp.docx
• The addition of the $855,857 reflects a transfer to Fund #311 that is part of a total 2013
commitment of $2,054,141 for pavement preservation.
• Related to Fund #311, we will be proposing that the fund name be changed from "Street
Capital Improvements 2011 +" to "Pavement Preservation ".
• We arrived at the $855,587 General Fund Transfer to the Pavement Preservation Fund
through the following actions that have occurred since the June 12'h Budget Retreat:
• Revenue estimates have increased by $208,800
• Recurring expenditures have been reduced by $597,057
• Nonrecurring expenditures have been reduced by $50,000
• 2013 Budget projections currently include $2,054,141 for pavement preservation projects.
This figure is an amount equivalent to 6% of the 2013 General Fund recurring expenditures
computed prior to adding a pavement preservation element ($34,235,677 x 6% _
$2,054,141).
• General Fund recurring expenditure budget amounts in the recent past have been (each
excluding pavement preservation):
0 2011 Budget $34,825,086
0 2012 Budget $34,660,400 ($164,686 or .4% less than 2011)
0 2013 Budget $34,235,677 ($424,723 or 1.227% less than 2012)
o The 2013 Budget of $34,235,677 is $589,409 or 1.7% less than 2011)
• Recurring revenues currently exceed recurring expenditures by $141,366.
• Nonrecurring expenditures include:
o $350,000 to be used only for Emergency /Contingency reasons. This represents 1% of
recurring expenditures. Although appropriated as part of the 2013 Budget, City staff
would not expend these monies without prior Council approval.
o A $50,000 transfer to Fund #309 for park capital projects.
• The total of 2013 recurring and nonrecurring expenditures exceeds total revenues by
$258,634.
• The projected General Fund fund balance at the end of 2013 is $25,371,974.
OPTIONS: State law requires a public hearing on 2013 estimated revenues and expenditures.
A hearing is scheduled for August 28, 2012.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: No action is requested at this time.
BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS: Given that the budget will not be adopted by the Council until
October 23, 2012, it is possible the figures may be modified as we refine estimates of revenues
and expenditures.
STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun, Finance Director
ATTACHMENTS:
• Power Point presentation.
• Assorted 2013 Budget information:
• Pages 1 -12 Budget summary information with detail by fund.
• Page 13 General Fund budget change from June 12 to August 14
• Page 14 Full -time equivalent employees (FTEs).
• Page 15 12 -year history of CPI and Social Security increases.
• Page 16 2010, 2011 and 2012 CPI information.
1kSV- FS21UsersVncalhounOudgets120131RCAs and Intros and PwrPnt presentatlons12012 08 14 RCA Est 2013 rev and exp.docx
Other Funds
Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax revenue that is collected by the State
and remitted to the Street Fund is anticipated to be $1,861,100.
Telephone Taxes that are remitted to the City and support Street
Fund operations and maintenance are anticipated to be
$2,900,000.
Real Estate Excise Tax (REST) revenues that are in large part
used to match grant funded street projects are anticipated to
total $1,000,000 — we are recommending that 30% of these be
dedicated to pavement preservation.
Hotel /Motel Tax revenues that are dedicated to the promotion of
visitors and tourism are anticipated to be $460,000.
Stormwater Management Fees of $1,800,000.
Aquifer Protection Area fees of $500,000.
8/9/2012 9
Future Council Budget
Discussions
Aug. 28 — Public Hearing #1 on revenues and
expenditures
�_- Sept. 11 — City Manager presentation of Preliminary 2013
Budget
Sept. 25 — Public hearing #2 on 2013 Budget
Oct. 9 — Public hearing #3 on 2013 Budget
Oct. 9 — First reading of ordinance adopting 2013 Budget.
rF Oct. 23 — Second reading of ordinance adopting 2013
Budget.
8/9/2012 10
\\SV -FS2\ Users \mcalhoun\Budgets\2013\8udget summary 2012 08 14 w page numbering for RCA
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
2013 Budget Worksheets
#001 - GENERAL FUND
RECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
Property Tax
Sales Tax
Criminal Justice Sales Tax
Public Safety Sales Tax
Gambling Tax
Franchise Fees /Business Licenses
State Shared Revenues
Service Revenue
Fines and Forfeitures
Recreation Program Fees
Miscellaneous & Investment Interest
Transfers -in - #101 (street admin)
Transfers -in - #105 (him tax -CP advertising)
Transfers -in - #402 (storm admin)
Total Recurring Revenues
Expenditures
Council
City Manager
Legal
Public Safety
Deputy City Manager
Finance
Human Resources
Public Works
Community Development - Administration
Community Development - Engineering
Community Development - Planning
Community Development - Building
Parks & Rec- Administration
Parks & Rec - Maintenance
Parks & Rec - Recreation
Parks & Rec -Aquatics
Parks & Rec - Senior Center
Parks & Rec - CenterPlace
General Government
Transfers -out - #502 (insurance premium)
Transfers out - #311 (pavement preservation)
Total Recurring Expenditures
Recurring Revenues Over (Under)
Recurring Expenditures
2012
As Amended
February 28
1 Amendment
As
I Amended
8/8/2012
2013 Difference Between
Proposed 2012 and 2013
Budget $ F %
10,808,900
0
10,808,900
11,051,900
243,000
2.25%
14,210,000
0
14,210,000
15,100,000
890,000
6.26%
1,200,000
0
1,200,000
1,280,000
80,000
6.67%
790,000
0
790,000
750,000
(40,000)
(5.06 %)
640,000
0
640,000
612,500
(27,500)
(4.30 %)
1,266,000
0
1,265,000
1,135,000
(131,000)
(10.35 %)
1,834,300
0
1,834,300
1,684,600
(149,700)
(8.16 %)
1,300,000
0
1,300,000
9,304,000
4,000
0.31%
1,900,000
0
1,900,000
1,502,300
(397,700)
(20.93 %)
570,000
0
570,000
571,500
1,500
0.26%
305,000
0
305,000
158,000
(147,000)
(48.20 %)
39,600
0
39,600
39,700
100
0.25%
30,000
0
30,000
30,000
0
0.00%
15,000
0
15,000
13,400
(1,600)
(10.67 %)
34,908,800
0
34,908,800
35,232,900
324,100
0.93%
386,249
0
386,249
390,111
3,862
1.00%
631,667
0
631,667
635,984
4,317
0.68%
434,798
0
434,798
411,171
(23,627)
(5.43 %)
22,000,000
0
22,000,000
22,139,200
139,200
0.63%
658,884
0
658,884
609,706
(49,178)
(7.46 %)
1,047,107
0
9,047,107
1,089,633
42,526
4.06%
230,231
0
230,231
228,041
(2,190)
(0.95 %)
901,519
0
901,519
876,443
(25,076)
(2.78 %)
323,743
0
323,743
257,175
(66,568)
(20.56 %)
680,796
0
680,796
850,845
170,049
24.98%
994,245
0
994,245
869,743
(124,502)
(12.52 %)
1,260,454
0
1,260,454
1,962,582
(97,872)
(7.76 %)
256,128
0
256,128
270,717
14,589
5.70%
803,700
0
803,700
789,000
(14,700)
(1.83 %)
229,811
0
229,811
224,999
(4,812)
(2.09 %)
442,250
0
442,250
485,600
43,350
9.80%
92,961
0
92,961
88,143
(4,818)
(5.18 %)
9,126,357
0
1,126,357
796,884
(329,473)
(29.25 %)
1,840,500
0
1,840,500
1,740,700
(99,800)
(5.42 %)
319,000
0
319,000
319,000
0
0.00%
0
0
0
855,857
855,857
#D1VI0!
34,660,400
0
34,660,400
35,091,534
431,134
1.24%
248,400 0 248,400 141,366
Page 1 of 16
\ \5V- F52 \Users\mcalhoun\Budgets \2013 \Budget summary 2012 08 14 w page numbering for RCA
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
2013 Budget Worksheets
#001 - GENERAL FUND - continued
NONRECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
Transfers -in - #310 (for #303 full paveback)
Transfers -in - #310 (for #311 street capital)
Total Nonrecurring Revenues
Expenditures
Contingency 1 Emergency (1 % of recur exp)
Transfers out - #303 (full paveback)
Transfers out - #309 (park grant match)
Transfers out - #311 (street capita! improvement)
Building permit software purchase
Total Nonrecurring Expenditures
Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under)
Nonrecurring Expenditures
Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues
Over (Under) Total Expenditures
Beginning fund balance
Ending fund balance
2012
As Amended
February 28
1 Amendment
As
I Amended
8!812012
2013 Difference Between
Proposed 2012 and 2013
Budget $ F %
0
0
0
0
0
#DIV /O!
0
0
0
0
0
#DIV /0!
0
0
0
0
0
#DIV /01
346,600
0
346,600
350,000
3,400
0.98%
89,500
0
89,500
0
(89,500)
(100.00 %)
100,000
0
100,000
50,000
(50,000)
(50.00 %)
0
2,045,203
2,045,203
0
(2,045,203)
(100.00 %)
0
81,692
81,692
0
(81,692)
(100.00 %)
536,100
2,126,895
2,662,995
400,000
(2,262,995 )
(84.98%
(536,100) (2,126,895) (2,662,9 (400,000)
(287,700) {2,126,895) (2,414,595) (258,634)
28,045,203 28,045,203 25,630,608
27,757,503 25,630,608 25,379,974
Page 2 of 16
\ \SV -FS2\ Users \mcalhoun \Budgets \2013 \Budget summary 2012 0814 w page numbering for RCA
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
2013 Budget Worksheets
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
#101 -STREET FUND
RECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
Motor Vehicle Fuel (Gas) Tax
Investment Interest
Utility Tax
Total Recurring Revenues
Expenditures
Wages 1 Benefits 1 Payroll Taxes
Supplies
Services & Charges
Intergovernmental Payments
Transfers -out - #001
Transfers -out - #501 (plow replace.)
Total Recurring Expenditures
Recurring Revenues Over (Under)
Recurring Expenditures
NONRECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
Grants
Miscellaneous
Total Nonrecurring Revenues
Expenditures
Transfers out - #311 (pavement preservation)
Capital Outlay - Truck Wash Facility
Transfers -out - #303
Building & Structures
Total Nonrecurring Expenditures
Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under)
Nonrecurring Expenditures
Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues
Over (Under) Total Expenditures
Beginning fund balance
Ending fund balance
2012
As Amended
February 28
1 Amendment
As
I Amended
8/8/2012
2013 Difference Between
Proposed 2012 and 2013
Budget $ T %
1,897,800
0
1,897,800
1,861,100
(36,700)
(1.93 %)
5,000
0
5,000
5,000
0
0.00%
3,000,000
0
3,000,000
2,900,000
(100,000)
(3.33 %)
4,902,800
0
4,902,800
4,766,100
(136,700)
(2.79 %)
40,000
0
40,000
0
522,142
0
522,142
573,170
51,028
9.77%
72,200
0
72,200
72,200
0
0.00%
3,299,544
0
3,299,544
2,929,152
(370,392)
(11.23 %)
847,000
0
847,000
847,000
0
0.00%
39,600
0
39,600
39,700
100
0.25%
110,777
0
110,777
160,777
50,000
4514%
4,891,263
0
4,891,263
4,621,999
(269,264)
(5.50 %Y
11,537 0 11,537 144,101
0 #DIV10!
0 #DIV10!
0
0
0
0
0
#DIVI01
0
0
0
262,000
282,000
#DIV /O!
0
0
0
180,000
180,000
#DIVIO!
500,000
0
500,000
0
(500,000)
(100.00 %)
40,000
0
40,000
0
(40,000)
(100.00 %)
540,000
0
540,000
462,000
(78,000 )
(14.44%
(540,000) 0 (540,000) u 46( 2,000)
(528,463) 0 (528,463) (317,899)
2,489,734 2,489,734 1,961,271
1,961,271 1,961,271 1,643,372
Page 3 of 16
\ \SV -FS2\ Users \mcalhoun \Budgets \2013 \Budget summary 2012 08 14 w page numbering for RCA
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
2013 Budget Worksheets
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS - continued
#103 - PATHS & TRAILS
Revenues
Motor Vehicle Fuel (Gas) Tax
Investment Interest
Total revenues
Exoenditures
Miscellaneous
Capital Outlay
Total expenditures
Revenues over (under) expenditures
Beginning fund balance
Ending fund balance
#105 - HOTEL 1 MOTEL TAX FUND
Revenues
HoteUMotel Tax
Investment Interest
Total revenues
Expenditures
Transfers out - #001
Tourism Promotion
Total expenditures
Revenues over (under) expenditures
Beginning fund balance
Ending fund balance
8/8/2012
2012 2013 Difference Between
As Amended AS Proposed 2012 and 2013
February 28 1 Amendment I Amended Budget $ %
8,000
0
8,000
7,800
(200)
(2.50 %)
0
0
0
0
0
#DIV10!
8,000
0
8,000
7,800
200
2.50 %)
0
0
0
0
0
#DIV10!
0
0
0
0
0
#DIV /O!
0
0
0
0
0
#DIWO!
8,000
0
8,000
7,800
0
56,084
257,932
56,084
64,084
118,432
64,084
257,932
64,084
71,884
118,432
430,000
0
430,000
460,000
30,000
6.98%
700
0
700
500
(200)
(28.57 %)
430,700
0
430,700
460.500
29,800
6.92%
30,000
0
30,000
30,000
0
0.00%
400,700
139,500
540,200
430,500
(109,700)
(20.31 %)
430,700
139,500
570,200
460,500
(109,700)
(19.24 °fin)
0
(139,500)
0
257,932
257,932
118,432
257,932
118,432
118,432
Page 4 of 16
\ \SV -FS2\ Users \mcalhoun \Budgets \2013 \Budget summary 2012 0814 w page numbering for RCA
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
2013 Budget Worksheets
2012
As Amended
February 28
Amendment
As
I Amended
8/8/2012
2013 Difference Between
Proposed 2012 and 2013
Budget F %
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS - continued
#120 - CENTER PLACE OPERATING RESERVE FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest 700 0 700 500 (200) (28.57 %)
Transfers -in 0 0 0 0 0 #DIVIO!
Total revenues 700 0 700 500 200 28.57%
Expenditures
Operations
0
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
Total expenditures
0
0
0
0
0
#DIV 101
Revenues over (under) expenditures
700
Ending fund balance
700
500
5,449,428
Beginning fund balance
350,787
350,787
351,487
Ending fund balance
351,487
351,487
351,987
#121 -SERVICE LEVEL STABILIZATION RESERVE FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest
10,000
0
10,000
7,000
(3,000)
(30.00 %)
Transfers -in
0
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
Total revenues
10,000
0
10,000
7,000
(3,000)
(30.00
Expenditures
Operations
0
0 0
0
Total expenditures
0
0 0
0
Revenues over (under) expenditures
10,000
10,000
7,000
Beginning fund balance
5,432,428
5,432,428
5,442,428
Ending fund balance
5,442,428
5,442,428
5,449,428
#122 - WINTER WEATHER RESERVE FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest
Transfers -in
Subtotal revenues
Expenditures
Reserve for Winter Weather
Total expenditures
Revenues over (under) expenditures
Beginning fund balance
Ending fund balance
#123 - CIVIC FACILITIES REPLACEMENT FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest
Transfers -in - 4001
Total revenues
Expenditures
Capital Outlay
Transfers out - #311 (pavement preservation)
Total expenditures
Revenues over (under) expenditures
Beginning fund balance
Ending fund balance
700 0 700
0 0 0
700 0 700
0 0
0 0
700
602,005
502,705
700
0
0
0
0
0
700
700
502,005
502,705
502,705
503,405
0 #DIV10!
0 MIMI
0
0
0.00%
#DIVI01
0
0.00%
0
#DIVIO!
0
#DIV10!
2,000 0 2,000 1,600 (400) (20.00°/x)
397,000 0 397,000 0 (397,000) (100.00 %)
399,000 0 399,000 1,600 (397,400) {99.60°/x)
0 0
0 0
0 0
399,000
2,004,848
2,403,848
Page 5 of 16
0
0
0
399,000
2,004,848
2,403,848
0 0 #DIWO!
616,284 816,284 #DIVIO!
616,284 616,284 #DIV /01
(614,684)
2,403,848
1,789,164
\\SV -F52\ Users \mcalhoun\Budgets\2013\Budget summary 2012 0814 w page numbering for RCA
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
2013 Budget Worksheets
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
#204 - DEBT SERVICE FUND
Revenues
Spokane Public Facilities District
Transfer -in - #301
Transfer -in - #302
Total revenues
E=xpenditures
Debt Service Payments - CenterPlace
Debt Service Payments - Roads
Total expenditures
Revenues over (under) expenditures
Beginning fund balance
Ending fund balance
2012
As Amended
February 28
Amendment
As
I Amended
8/8/2012
2013 Difference Between
Proposed 2012 and 2013
Budget $ F %
432,320
0
432,320
437,120
4,600
1111%
92,652
0
92,652
92,951
299
0.32%
92,651
0
92,651
92,952
301
0.32%
617,623
0
617,623
623,023
5,400
0.87%
432,320
0
432,320
437,120
4,800
1.11%
185,303
0
185,303
1185,903
600
0.32%
617,623
0
617,623
623,023
5,400
0.87%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 6 of 16
\\SV -F52\ users \mcalhoun\Budgets\2013\Budget summary 2012 08 14 w page numbering for RCA
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
0
0
92,651
0
92,651
8/8/2012
2013 Budget Worksheets
1,448,059
0
0
0
1,540,710
0
1,540,710
(1,063,710)
2012
(1,063,710)
2013
Difference Between
566,593
As Amended
566,593
As
Proposed
2012 and 2013
February 28
Amendment
Amended
Budget
$
%
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS
#301 -CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
REST 1 - Taxes
475,000
0
475,000
500,000
25,000
5.26%
Investment Interest
400
0
400
500
100
25.00%
Total revenues
475,400
0
475,400
500,500
25,100
5.28%
Expenditures
Transfer -out - #204
92,652
0
92,652
92,951
299
0.32%
Transfer- out - #303
363,627
0
363,627
291,501
(72,126)
(19.84 %)
Transfers out - #311 (pavement preservation)
0
0
0
150,000
150,000
#DIVIOI
Total expenditures
456,279
0
456,279
534,452
78,173
17.13%
Revenues over (under) expenditures
19,121
19,121
(33,952)
Beginning fund balance
772,072
772,072
791,193
Ending fund balance
791,193
791,193
757,241
#302 SPECIAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
REET 2 - Taxes
Investment Interest
Interfund Transfer -in
Total revenues
Expenditures
Transfer -out - #101
Transfer -out - #204
Transfer -out - #303
Transfers out - #311 (pavement preservation)
Total expenditures
Revenues over (under) expenditures
Beginning fund balance
Ending fund balance
475,000 0 475,000 500,000
2,000 0 2,000 1,000
0 0 0 0
477,000 0 477,000 501,000
0
0
0
92,651
0
92,651
1,448,059
0
1,448,059
0
0
0
1,540,710
0
1,540,710
(1,063,710)
(1,063,710)
1,630,303
1,630,303
566,593
566,593
Page 7 of 16
0
92,952
356,215
150,000
599,167
(98,167)
566,593
468,426
25,000
5.26%
(1,000)
(50.00 %)
0
#DIVIO!
24,000
5.03%
0 #DIVIO!
301 0.32%
(1,091,844) (75.40 %)
150,000 #DIVIO!
(941,543) (81,11%)
\\SV -FS2\ Users \mcalhoun\Budget5\2013\Budget summary 2012 08 14 w page numbering for RCA
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
2013 Budget Worksheets
2012
As Amended
February 28
Amendment
_-Wi-
I Amended
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS - continued
#303 STREET CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
Grant Proceeds
Developer Contribution
Miscellaneous
Transfer -in - #001
Transfer -in - #101
Transfer -in - #102
Transfer -in - #301
Transfer -in - #302
Transfer -in - #311
Transfer -in - #401
Total revenues
Expenditures
005 Pines /Mansfield, Wilbur Rd. to Pines
060 Argonne Rd - 190 to Trent
061 Pines (SR27) ITS Imporvements
115 Sprague Ave Resurfacing- Evergreen to Sullivan
123 Mission Ave -Flora to Barker (PE & RW)
Contingency
141 Sullivan & Euclid PCC (PE & RW)
142 Broadway @ ArgonnelMullan PCC int,(PEIRW)
145 Spokane Valley - Millwood Trail
146 24th Ave Sidewalk - Adams to Sullivan
148 Greenacres Trail - Design
149 In -House Design - Sidewalk Infill
154 Sidewalk & Tansit Stop Accessibility
155 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement
156 Mansfield Ave. Connection
157 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Temp Repairs
159 University Rd 11 -90 Overpass Study
160 Evergreen - 16th to 32nd reconstruction
Pines Rd (SR27) & Grace Ave. Intersect Study
Citywide Safety Improvements
ArgonnelMullan Corridor Safety - Indiana to Broads
Argonne Road - Empire to Knox
Wellesley Ave & Adams Rd Sidewalk
Sprague Ave ADA Sdwlk Improve (Havana -Fanct
063 Broadway Avenue Safety Project Pines- Park
065 Sprague /Sullivan PCC Intersection
069 Park Road - #2 (PE Only) - Broadway to Indiana
112 Indiana Ave. Extension - 3600
113 Indiana /Sullivan Intersection PCC
139 Park Rd RR Crosing Safety Improvements
STEP Projects (106,107,109,128,129,130,131)
Total expenditures
Revenues over (under) expenditures
Beginning fund balance
Ending fund balance
8/8/2012
2013 Difference Between
Proposed 2012 and 2013
Budget $ F %
7,828,118
0
7,828,118
4,048,543
(3,779,575)
(48.28 %)
275,000
0
275,000
0
(275,000)
(100.00 %)
0
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
89,000
0
89,000
0
(89,000)
(100.00 %)
0
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
0
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
363,627
0
363,627
291,501
(72,126)
(19.84 %)
1,448,059
0
1,448,059
356,215
(1,091,844)
(75.40 %)
811,000
0
811,000
0
(811,000)
(100.00 %)
0
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
10,814,804
0
10,814,804
4,696,259
(6,118,545)
(56.58 %)
463,312
0
463,312
0
(463,312)
(100.00 %)
802,792
0
802,792
43,014
(759,778)
(94.64 %)
1,766,201
0
1,766,201
637,288
(1,128,913)
(63.92 %)
1,582,000
0
1,582,000
188,745
(1,393,255)
(88.07 %)
300,000
0
300,000
0
(300,000)
(100.00°/x)
1,500,000
0
1,500,000
1,500,000
0
0.00%
26,289
0
26,289
0
(26,289)
(100.00 %)
138,150
0
138,150
0
(138,150)
(100.00 %)
447,000
0
447,000
0
(447,000)
(100.00 %)
278,520
0
278,520
0
(278,520)
(100.00 %)
60,000
0
60,000
0
(60,000)
(100.00 %)
398,250
0
398,250
317,363
(80,887)
(20.31 %)
182,290
0
182,290
48,002
(134,288)
(73.67 %)
600,000
0
600,000
345,614
(254,386)
(42.40 %)
738,000
0
738,000
0
(738,000)
(100.00 %)
200,000
0
200,000
0
(200,000)
(100.00 %)
284,000
0
284,000
125,000
(159,000)
(55.99 %)
959,000
0
959,000
0
(959,000)
(100.00 %)
0
0
0
98,100
98,100
#DIVIO!
0
0
0
450,996
450,996
#DIVIO!
0
0
0
104,460
104,460
#DIV10!
0
0
0
172,785
172,785
#DIVIO!
0
0
0
554,500
554,500
#DIVIO!
0
0
0
110,392
110,392
#DIVIO!
0
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
0
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
0
0
0
0
0
#DIVI01
0
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
0
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
0
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
0
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
10,725,804
0
10,725,804
4,696,259
(6,029,545)
(56.22 %)
89,000
89,000
0
73,646
73,646
162,646
162,646
162,646
162,646
Page 8 of 16
\\SV -FS2\ Users \mcalhoun\Budgets\2013\Budget summary 2012 08 14 w page numbering for RCA
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
2013 Budget Worksheets
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS - continued
#304 - MIRABEAU PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
Other Miscellaneous Revenue
Investment Interest
Total revenues
Expenditures
Capital Outlays
Transfers
Total expenditures
Revenues over (under) expenditures
Beginning fund balance
Ending fund balance
#307 - CAPITAL GRANTS FUND
Revenues
Grant Proceeds
Miscellaneous
Transfer -in - #302
Total revenues
Expenditures
069 Broadway -190 to Park Road - Trans - #302
088 Broadway - Moore to Flora
Miscellaneous
Total expenditures
Revenues over (under) expenditures
Beginning fund balance
Ending fund balance
#309 - PARKS CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
Grant Proceeds
Transfer -in - #001
Investment Interest
Total revenues
Expenditures
Terrace View Park Shelter
Terrace View Park Play Equipment
Contingency
Greenacres Park
Capital
Total expenditures
Revenues over (under) expenditures
Beginning fund balance
Ending fund balance
2012
As Amended
February 28
Amendment
As
I Amended
8/8/2012
2013 Difference Between
Proposed 2012 and 2013
Budget $ F %
0
0
0
0
0
#DIV101
0
0
0
0
0
#DIV101
0
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
100,000
0
100,000
50,000
0
0
0
0
0
#DiV10!
0
0
0
0
0
#DIV101
0
0
0
0
0
#D1V10!
0
0
0
0
(50,000)
(100.00 %)
44,347
0
44,347
44,347
0
#DIV101
44,347
0
44,347
44,347
50,000
#DIV101
0
0
0
0
0
#D!V /O!
0
0
0
0
0
#DIVro!
0
0
0
0
0
#DIV/01
0
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
0
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
0
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
0
0
0
0
0
#DIV10!
0
0
0
0
0
#DIVI0!
0
0
0
147
147
147
147
147
147
0
0
0
0
0
#DIV /O!
100,000
0
100,000
50,000
(50,000)
(50.00 %)
0
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
100,000
0
100,000
50,000
(50,000
50.00 %)
0
0
0
0
0
#DIV101
120,000
0
120,000
0
(120,000)
(100.00 %)
50,000
0
50,000
0
(50,000)
(100.00 %)
0
0
0
0
0
#DIV101
0
0
0
50,000
50,000
#DIV101
170,000
0
170,000
50,000
(120,000)
(70.59 %)
(70,000)
(70,000)
0
411,151
411,151
341,151
341,151
341,151
341,151
Page 9 of 16
\ASV -FS2\ Users \mcalhoun\Budgets\2013\Budget summary 2012 08 14 w page numbering for RCA
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
2013 Budget Worksheets
2012
As Amended
February 28
1 Amendment
As
I Amended
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS - continued
#310 - CIVIC FACILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
Spokane Cnty reimb on STEP -48th & Sundown 0 78,500 78,500
Investment Interest 6,000 0 6,000
6,000 78,500 84,500
Total revenues
Expenditures
8/8/2012
2013 Difference Between
Proposed 2012 and 2013
Budget $ %
0 (78,500) (100.00 %)
0 (6,000) (100.00 %)
0 84,500 100.00%
West Gateway at Thierman
120,000
0
120,000
0
(120,000)
(100.00 %)
STEP - Greenhaven
0
118,000
118,000
0
(118,000)
(100.00 %)
STEP - 48th & Sundown
0
173,500
173,500
0
(173,500)
(100.00 %)
Prof Svc related to potential Sprague prop acq
0
30,000
30,000
0
(30,000)
(100,00 %)
Acquisition of Sprague property
0
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
Total expenditures
120,000
321,500
441,500
0
(441,500)
(100.00 %)
Revenues over (under) expenditures
(114,000)
(357,000)
0
Beginning fund balance
3,856,623
3,856,623
3,499,623
Ending fund balance
3,742,623
3,499,623
3,499,623
#311 -STREET CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 2011+
Revenues
Transfers in - #001 (100 % >$26mm)
0
2,045,203
2,045,203
0
(2,045,203)
(100.00 %)
Transfers in - #001
0
0
0
855,657
855,857
#DIVIO!
Transfers -in #101
0
0
0
282,000
282,000
#DIVIO!
Transfers -in #123
0
0
0
616,284
616,284
#DIVIO!
Transfers -in #301
0
0
0
150,000
150,000
#DIVIO!
Transfers -in #302
0
0
0
150,000
150,000
#DIVIO!
Investment Interest
2,200
0
2,200
0
(2,200)
(100.00 %)
Total revenues
2,200
2,045,203
2,047,403
2,054,141
6,738
0.33%
Expenditures
Pavement preservation
0
0
0
2,054,141
2,054,141
#DIVIO!
Transfers -out #303 - Sullivan Brdg Rpr
200,000
0
200,000
0
(200,000)
(100.00°/x)
Tran sfers-o u t #303 - Evergreen 16 -32
111,000
0
111,000
0
(111,000)
(100.00 %)
2012 Pavement Preservation -Phase 1 & 2
0
2,818,883
2,818,883
0
(2,818,883)
(100.00 %)
Total expenditures
311,000
2,818,883
3,129,883
2,054,141
(1,075,742 )
(34.37%
Revenues over (under) expenditures
(308,800)
(1,082,480)
0
Beginning fund balance
1,084,681
1,084,681
2,201
Ending fund balance
775,861
2,201
2,201
Page 10 of 16
\ \SV -F52\ Users \mcalhoun \Budgets \2013 \Budget summary 2012 08 14 w page numbering for RCA
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
2013 Budget Worksheets
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
#402 - STORMWATER FUND
RECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
Stormwater Management Fees
Investment Interest
Miscellaneous
Total Recurring Revenues
Expenditures
Wages 1 Benefits 1 Payroll Taxes
Supplies
Services 8 Charges
Intergovernmental Payments
Transfers -out - #001
Transfers -out - #303
Total Recurring Expenditures
Recurring Revenues Over (Under)
Recurring Expenditures
NONRECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
Grant Proceeds
Transfers -in - #101 (shop facility)
Total Nonrecurring Revenues
Expenditures
Capital - various projects
Street/ Storm Maintenance Facility
Total Nonrecurring Expenditures
Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under)
Nonrecurring Expenditures
Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues
Over (Under) Total Expenditures
Beginning working capital
Ending working capital
4403 - AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA
Revenues
Spokane County
Investment Interest
Grant - Sprague Swales
Grant - Decant Facility
Total revenues
Exoenditures
Sprague Swales
Decant Facility
Capital outlay
Total expenditures
Revenues over (under) expenditures
Beginning working capital
Ending working capital
2012
As Amended
February 28
1 Amendment
As
I Amended
8/8/2012
2013 Difference Between
Proposed 2012 and 2013
Budget $ %
1,750,000
0
1,750,000
1,800,000
50,000
2.86%
5,000
0
5,000
1,800
(3,200)
(64,00 %)
0
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
1,755,000
0
1,755,000
1,801,800
46,800
2.67%
502,500
666,662
1,169,162
501,000
438,614
0
438,614
475,604
36,990
8.43%
32,540
0
32,540
16,300
(16,240)
(49.91 %)
1,244,287
0
1,244,287
1,132,687
(111,600)
(8.97%)
23,000
0
23,000
23,000
0
0.00%
15,000
0
15,000
13,400
(1,600)
(10.67 %)
0
0
0
0
0
#DIV10!
1,753,441
0
1,753,441
1,660,991
92,450
(5.27%
1,559 0 1,559 140,809
153,667 0 153,667
0 0 0
153,667 0 153,667
0 (153,667) (100.00 %)
0 0 #DIV101
0 (153,667) (100.00 %)
400,000 0 400,000 200,000 (200,000) (50.00 %)
0 0 0 0 0 #DIV10!
400,000 0 400,000 200,000 (200,000) (50.00 %)
(246,333) 0 (246,333) (200,000)
(244,774) 0 (244,774) (59,191)
2,382,660 2,382,660 2,137,886
2,137,886 2,137,886 2,078,695
500,000
0
500,000
500,000
0
0.00%
2,500
0
2,500
1,000
(1,500)
(60.00 %)
0
666,662
666,662
0
(666,662)
(100.00 %)
0
0
0
0
0
#DIV1O!
502,500
666,662
1,169,162
501,000
(668,162)
(57.15 %)
630,000
258,829
888,829
0
(888,829)
(100,00 %)
0
0
0
0
0
#DIV101
0
0
500,000
500,000
#DIV10!
630,000
258,829
888,$29
500,000
(388,829)
(43.75 %)
(127,500)
280,333
1,000
417,326
417,326
697,659
289,826
697,659
698,659
Page 11 of 16
\NSV -F52\ Users \mcalhoun\Budgets\2013\Budget summary 2012 08 14 w page numbering for RCA
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
2013 Budget Worksheets
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
#501 - ER &R FUND
Revenues
Transfer -in - #001
Transfer -in - #101
Transfer -in - #101 (plow replace.)
Transfer -in - #402
Investment Interest
Total revenues
Expenditures
Computer replacement lease
Software /Hardware replacement
Vehicle Replacement
Snow Plow Replacement
Total expenditures
Revenues over (under) expenditures
Beginning working capital
Ending working capital
#502 - RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest
Transfer -in - #001
Total revenues
Expenditures
Auto & Property Insurance
Unemployment Claims
Miscellaneous
Total expenditures
Revenues over (under) expenditures
Beginning fund balance
Ending fund balance
TOTAL OF ALL FUNDS
Total of Revenues for all Funds
Total of Expenditures for all Funds
2012
__Ts
As Amended
February 28
1 Amendment
I Amended
81812D12
2013 Difference Between
Proposed 2012 and 2013
Budget $ 7 %
0
0
0
15,400
15,400
#DIV /O!
0
0
0
10,777
10,777
#DIV /O!
100,000
0
100,000
150,000
50,000
50.00%
0
0
0
1 ,567
1,567
#DIV10!
0
0
0
1,000
1,000
#DIV101
100,000
0
100,000
178,744
78,744
78.74%
0
0
0
0
0
#DIV101
0
0
0
0
0
#DIVI01
0
0
0
50,000
50,000
#DIV101
0
0
0
250,000
250,000
#DIV101
0
0
0
300,000
300,000
#DIV /O!
100,000
100,000
(121,256)
932,335
932,335
1,032,335
1,032,335
1,032,335
911,079
0
0
0
0
0
#DIV10?
319,000
0
319,000
319,000
0
0.00%
319,000
0
319,000
319,000
0
0.00%
319,000
0
319,000
319,000
0
0.00%
0
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
0
0
0
0
0
#DIVIO!
319,000
0
319,000
319,000
0
0.00%
0
0
0
30,590
30,590
30,590
30,590
30,590
30,590
55,983,894 2,790,365 58,774,259 51,702,567
58,102,320 5,665,607 63,767,927 53,189,350
Total Capital expenditures (included in
total expenditures) 12,396,804 3,480,904 15,877,708 7,980,400
Page 12 of 16
\ASV-52\U s e rs\mca I ho u n\B u dgets\2013\Bud get summary 2012 08 14 w page numbering for RCA
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 8/8/2012
General Fund #001
2013 Budget Worksheets - Changes from June 12 to August 14
RECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
Property Tax
Sales Tax
Criminal Justice Tax
Public safety Sales Tax
Gambling Tax and Leasehold Excise Tax
Franchise Fees /Business Registration
State Shared Revenues
Planning & Building
Fines and Forfeitures
Recreation Program Fees
Miscellaneous & Investment Interest
Transfer -in -#101 (street admin)
Transfer -in - #105 (h1m tax -CP advertising)
Transfer -in - #402 (storm admin)
Total Recurring Revenues
Expenditures
City Council
City Manager
Legal
Public Safety
Deputy City Manager
Finance
Human Resources
Public Works
Community Development - Administration
Community Development - Engineering
Community Development - Planning
Community Development - Building
Parks & Rec - Administration
Parks & Rec - Maintenance
Parks & Rec - Recreation
Parks & Rec - Aquatics
Parks & Rec - Senior Center
Parks & Rec - CenterPlace
General Government
Transfers out - #502 (insurance premium)
Transfers out - #311 (pavement preservation)
Total Recurring Expenditures
Recurring Revenues Over (Under)
Recurring Expenditures
NONRECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
nla
Total Nonrecurring Revenues
Expenditures
Contingency I Emergency (1 % of recur exp)
Transfers out - #309 (park grant match)
Total Nonrecurring Expenditures
Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under)
Nonrecurring Expenditures
Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues
Over (Under) Total Expenditures
Beginning fund balance
Ending fund balance
2013 Budget
as of
6/12/2012
as of
8/14/2012
Difference
Inc (Dec)
10,992,000 11,051,900 59,900
15,100,000
15,100,000
0
1,280,000
1,280,000
0
750,000
750,000
0
612,500
612,500
0
1,135,000
1,935,000
0
1,535,700
1,684,600
148,900
1,304,000
1,304,000
0
1,502,300
1,502,300
0
571,500
571,500
0
158,000
158,000
0
39,700
39,700
0
30,000
30,000
0
13,400
13,400
0
35,024,100
35,232,900
208,800
390,111
390,111
0
637,984
635,984
(2,000)
439,161
411,171
(27, 990)
22,220,000
22,139,200
(80,800)
665,473
609,706
(55,767)
1,089,633
1,089,633
0
231,541
228,041
(3,500)
876,443
876,443
0
257,175
257,175
0
850,845
850,845
0
869,743
869,743
0
1,162,582
1,162,582
0
270,717
270,717
0
789,000
789,000
0
224,999
224,999
0
485,600
485,600
0
88,143
88,143
0
1,113,8134
796,884
(317,000)
1,850,700
1,740,700
(110,000)
319,000
319,000
0
0
855,857
855,857
34,832,734
35,091,534
258,800
191,366 141,366 50,000
0 0 0
350,000 350,000 0
100,000 50,000 (50,000)
450,000 400,000 (50,000)
(450,000) (400,000) 50,000
(258,634) (258,634) 0
25,630,608 25,630,608 0
25,371,974 25,371,974 0
Page 13 of 16
\\SV -FS2\ Users \mcalhoun\Budgets\2013\Budget summary 2012 08 14 w page numbering for RCA
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Full Time Equivalent Employees
Difference from
Adopted Budgets Prelim 2012 to 2013
2009 1 2010 1 2011 F2012 2013 +( -}
General Fund
City Manager 1 City Clerk
5
5
5
5
5
Legal
3
3
3
3
3
Deputy City Manager
8
8
6
7
6
(1.000)
Finance
10
12
11
11
10.75
(0.250)
Human Resources
2
2
2
2
2
Public Works
7.5
7.5
7.5
7
7
CD - Administration
3
3
3
3
2
(1.000)
CD - Engineering
8
8
6
6
8
2.000
CD - Planning
9
9
8.5
8.5
8
(0.500)
CD - Building
14.75
14.75
12.75
12.75
11.5
(1.250)
Parks & Rec - Admin
2
2
2
2
2
Parks & Rec - Recreation
1
1
1
1
1
Parks & Rec - Senior Cntr
1
1
1
1
1
Parks & Rec - CenterPlace
7
7
5
5
5
Total General Fund
81.25
83.25
73.75
74.25
72.250
(2,000)
Street Fund
5
5
4.5
5
5
Street Capital Project Fund
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
Storm Wafer Fund
4
4
4.5
4.5
4.5
Total FTEs
93.75
95.75
86.25
87.25
85.250
Page 14 of 16
(0.750)
\\SV -FS2\ Users \mcalhoun\Budgets\2013\Budget summary 2012 08 14 w page numbering for RCA
History of CPI as Published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics
and Social Security COLAs for the years 2001 through 2012
July to July -
U.S. City Average
Year
CPI -U
CPI -W
2012
n/a
n/a
2011
3.6
4.1
2010
1.2
1.6
2009
-2.1
-2.7
2008
5.6
6.2
2007
2.4
2.3
2006
4.1
4.3
2005
3.2
3.3
2004
3.0
3.0
2003
2.1
2.0
2002
1.5
1.3
2001
2.7
2.6
7/30/2012
Social Security CPI Increase:
For calendar year 2012
3.6
For calendar year 2011
0.0
For calendar year 2010
0.0
For calendar year 2009
5.8
For calendar year 2008
2.3
For calendar year 2007
3.3
For calendar year 2006
4.1
For calendar year 2005
23
For calendar year 2004
2.1
For calendar year 2003
1.4
For calendar year 2002
2.6
For calendar year 2001
3.5
average 2.4818 2.5455 average 2.6167
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics
CPI -U = All Urban Consumers
The CPI -U measures consumer inflation for all U.S. residents of urban areas, which accounts
for about 87% of the U.S. population.
CPI -W = Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers
The CPI -W measures consumer price inflation for a subset of the CPI -U population: residents
of ubran areas who live in households that:
receive more than half of their income from clerical or wage occupations, and
have one earner employed for at least 37 weeks during the previous 12 months.
The CPI -W covers about 32 percent of the U.S. population.
The CPI -U is the most commonly used index because it has the broadest population
coverage. However, the CPI -W is used sometimes to make cost -of- living adjustments for
labor contracts.
Page 15 of 16
\\SV -FS2\ Users \mcaIhoun\Budgets\2013\Budget summary 2012 08 14 w page numbering for RCA
CPI as Published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics 7/30/2012
Comparing Change from 2010 to 2011
January
2011
to
U.S. City Average
2012
2.9
3.1
February
2011
to
February
2012
CPI -U
CPl -W
January
2010
to
January
2011
1.6
1.8
February
2010
to
February
2011
2.1
2.3
March
2010
to
March
2011
2.7
3.0
April
2010
to
April
2011
3.2
3.6
May
2010
to
May
2011
3.6
4.1
June
2010
to
June
2011
3.6
4.1
July
2010
to
July
2011
3.6
4.1
August
2010
to
August
2011
3.8
4.3
September
2010
to
September
2011
3.9
4.4
October
2010
to
October
2011
3.5
3.9
November
2010
to
November
2011
3.4
3.8
December
2010
to
December
2011
3.0
3.2
January
2011
to
January
2012
2.9
3.1
February
2011
to
February
2012
2.9
3.1
March
2011
to
March
2012
2.7
19
April
2011
to
April
2012
2.3
2.4
May
2011
to
May
2012
1.7
1.6
June
2011
to
June
2012
1.7
1.6
Page 16 of 16
City of Spokane Valley
2013 Budget Discussion
Administrative Report on
2013 Revenues and Expenditures
August 14, 2012
8/9/2012
2013 Budget Summary
All Funds
Total appropriations across all City Funds of $53.2 million
including $8.0 million in capital expenditures.
Budgets will be adopted across 21 separate funds.
FTE count will decrease by 2.0 employees from 87.25 in
2012 to 85.25 in 2013.
8/9/2012 2
General Fund
REVENUES:
Total recurring 2013 revenues of $35,232,900 as
compared to $34,908,800
$324,100 or 0.93 %.
in 2012 for an increase of
All revenue estimates are based upon a combination of
historical collections and future projections with some
increasing and others decreasing.
2 largest sources are Sales Tax and Property Tax which
are collectively estimated to account for 80% of 2013
General Fund revenues.
General sales tax collections are estimated at $15.1
million, an increase of $890,000 over the 2012 Budget.
8/9/2012 3
General Fund
Property Tax levy is proposed to include the 1 % increase
authorized by 1 #747.
2013 Levy is estimated at $11,051,900
Levy assumes we start with the 2012 levy of
$1078187717 + 1 % or $108,187 + estimated new
construction of $125,000
8/9/2012 4
General Fund
EXPENDITURES:
2013 Recurring expenditures prior to adding a pavement
preservation component are $34,235,677 representing a
reduction of $424,723 or 1.22% compared to the 2012
appropriation of $34,660,400.
To the $34,235,677 is added $855,857 for total recurring
expenditures of $35,091,534 for an increase of $431,134
or 1.24% compared to the previous year.
The addition of $855,857 reflects a transfer to Fund #311
that is part of a total 2013 commitment of $2,054,141 for
pavement preservation.
8/9/2012 5
General Fund
Related to Fund #311 we will be proposing that the fund
name be changed from "Street Fund Capital
Improvements 2011 +" to "Pavement Preservation ".
We arrived at the $855,857 General Fund Transfer
through the following actions that have taken place since
the June 12th retreat:
$208,800 revenue estimate increase
■ $597,057 recurring expenditure reduction
� 50,000 nonrecurring expenditure reduction
$8557857
8/9/2012 6
General Fund
2013 Budget projections currently include $2,054,141 for
pavement preservation.
This is equivalent to 6% of the 2013 General Fund
recurring expenditures
pavement preservation
$270547141).
computed prior to adding a
element ($34,235,677 x 6% _
General Fund recurring expenditure budget history
(excluding pavement preservation):
2011 $3418251086
• 2012 $3416601400 ($164,686 or .4% less than 2011)
* 2013 $3412351677 ($424,723 or 1.22% less than 2012)
* 2013 Budget of $34,235,677 is $589,409 or 1.7% less than
2011)
8/9/2012 7
General Fund
Recurring revenues currently exceed recurring
expenditures by $141,366.
Nonrecurring expenditures include:
$350,000 to be used only for Emergency /Contingency
reasons.
A $50,000 transfer to Fund #309 for park capital projects.
The total of 2013 recurring and nonrecurring expenditures
exceeds total revenues by $258,634.
Projected fund balance at the end of 2013 is currently
$2573717974.
8/9/2012 8
Other Funds
Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax revenue that is collected by the State
and remitted to the Street Fund is anticipated to be $1,861,100.
Telephone Taxes that are remitted to the City and support Street
Fund operations and maintenance are anticipated to be
$219001000.
Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) revenues that are in large part
used to match grant funded street projects are anticipated to
total $1,000,000 — we are recommending that 30% of these be
dedicated to pavement preservation.
Hotel /Motel Tax revenues that are dedicated to the promotion of
visitors and tourism are anticipated to be $460,000.
Stormwater Management Fees of $1,800,000.
Aquifer Protection Area fees of $500,000.
8/9/2012 9
Future Council Budget
Discussions
Aug. 28 — Public Hearing #1 on revenues and
expenditures
Sept. 11 — City Manager presentation of Preliminary 2013
Budget
Sept. 25 — Public hearing #2 on 2013 Budget
Oct. 9 — Public hearing #3 on 2013 Budget
Oct. 9 — First reading of ordinance adopting 2013 Budget.
Oct. 23 — Second reading of ordinance adopting 2013
Budget.
8/9/2012 10
DRAFT
ADVANCE AGENDA
For Planning Discussion Purposes Only
as of August 8, 2012; 3:00 p.m.
Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative
To: Council & Staff
From: City Clerk, by direction of City Manager
Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings
August 21, 2012, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Aug 13]]
ACTION ITEMS:
1. Motion Consideration: Sprague Swale Upgrade Project Bid Award— Steve Worley (10 minutes)
NON - ACTION ITEMS:
2. Zoning Use Matrix — Christina Janssen (20 minutes)
3. Animal Shelters, SVMC Title 19.120 Amendment, (to permit in CMU zones) - Karen Kendall (20 min)
4. Potential Revisions to Comp Plan Amendment Process — Scott Kuhta (30 minutes)
5. Multi- Family Zone Requirements Review — Scott Kuhta (20 minutes)
6. Planning Commission Rules of Procedure — Cary Driskell (20 minutes)
7. Sprague Property Update — Mark Calhoun, Inga Note, Mike Jackson (20 minutes)
8. Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
[ *estimated meeting: 145 minutes]
August 28, 2012, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Aug 201
1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2013 Budget (estimated revenues & expenditures) (10 minutes)
2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes)
3. First Reading Proposed Ordinance Amending Zoning Use Matrix— Christina Janssen (15 minutes)
4. Admin Report: Proposed 2013 Property Tax Ordinances — Mark Calhoun (20 minutes)
5. Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
6. Info Only: Department Reports [ *estimated meeting: 55 minutes]
September 4, 2012, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Aug 271
1. Outside Agencies: Presentations from Economic Development Orgs — Mark Calhoun ( -30 min)
2. STA Presentation: Future Transit Planning & SV Corridor Potential Projects — Susan Meyer (15 minutes)
3. Sprague Appleway Corridor Environmental Assessment — Public Works (30 minutes)
4. Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
[ *estimated meeting: 80 minutes]
September 11, 2012, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Tues, Sept 41
Proclamation: National Fall Prevention Day (Sept 21)
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes)
2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance Amending Zoning Use Matrix — Christina Janssen (15 minutes)
3. Admin Report: Presentation of City Manager's Preliminary 2013 budget — Mike Jackson (15 minutes)
4. Admin Report: Outside Agencies: Presentations from Social Service Agencies — M.Calhoun ( -60 min)
5. Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
[ *estimated meeting: 100 minutes]
Draft Advance Agenda 8/9/2012 4:44:01 PM Page 1 of 3
September 18, 2012, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Sept 101
1. Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
September 25, 2012, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Sept 171
1. PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed 2013 Budget — Mark Calhoun (20 minutes)
2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes)
3. Motion Consideration: Allocation of Funds to Outside Agencies — Mark Calhoun (20 minutes)
4. Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
5. Info Only: Department Reports [ *estimated meeting: 50 minutes]
October 2, 2012, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Sept 241
1. Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
October 9, 2012, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon Oct 11
1. PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed 2013 Budget — Mark Calhoun (20 minutes)
2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes)
3. First Reading Proposed Ordinance for Property Tax — Mark Calhoun (15 minutes)
4. First Reading Proposed Ordinance Adopting 2013 Budget — Mark Calhoun (15 minutes)
5. Motion Consideration: Allocation of Funds to Outside Agencies — Mark Calhoun (20 minutes)
6. Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
[ *estimated meeting: 80 minutes]
October 16, 2012, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda
October 23. 2012. Formal Meeting Format. 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. Second Reading Ordinance Proposed Property Tax — Mark Calhoun
3. Second Reading Ordinance Adopting 2013 Budget — Mark Calhoun
4. Admin Report: Advance Agenda
5. Info Only: Department Reports
October 30, 2012, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda
November 6, 2012, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda
November 13, 2012, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
November 20, 2012 — No Meeting. Thanksgiving Week
November 27, 2012, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda
3. Info Only: Department Reports
[due Mon, Oct 81
(5 minutes)
[due Mon, Oct 151
(5 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(15 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[ *estimated meeting: 35 minutes]
[due Mon, Oct 221
(5 minutes)
[due Mon, Oct 291
(5 minutes)
[due Mon, Nov 51
[due Mon, Nov 191
(5 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[ *estimated meeting: minutes]
Draft Advance Agenda 8/9/2012 4:44:01 PM Page 2 of 3
December 4, 2012, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda
December 11, 2012, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. Motion Consideration: Mayoral Appointments to Planning Commission, et al
3. Admin Report: Advance Agenda
December 18, 2012, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda
2. Info Only: Department Reports
December 25, 2012. No meeting. Christmas week
January 1, 2013. No meeting. New Year's Dav
ADA Transition Plan
Arts Council
Bidding Contracts (SVMC 3. — bidding exceptions)
Budget Amendment, 2012
Centennial Trail Agreement
City Hall Analysis
Contracts, Annual Renewals, histories, etc.
Donation Policy
Future Acquisition Areas
Greenacres Trail Grant
Interstate Signage
Investment Accounts
Lodging Tax Funding
Manufactured Homes
Nuisance, SVMC 7.05, Amendment
Nuisance Compliance Amendments SVMC 17.100
Pedestrian/Bicycle Grant Program
Planning Commission Rules of Procedure
Prosecution Services
Revenue Policy, Cost Recovery
Snow Plows, Discussion of
Speed Limits (overall system)
[due Mon, Nov 261
(5 minutes)
[due Mon, Dec 31
(5 minutes)
(15 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[ *estimated meeting: minutes]
[due Mon, Dec 10]
Stormwater Projects
Truck Traffic; Truck Parking in Residential Areas
*time for public or council comments not included
Draft Advance Agenda 8/9/2012 4:44:01 PM Page 3 of 3
jUalley
Administrative Proiects:
Operations & Administrative Services
2012 — 2nd Quarter Report
• Council, Executive - Legislative and Operations & Administrative Draft Budgets
• 2013 Draft Business Plan Preparation
• Summer Council Budget Workshop, June 12
• Graffiti Abatement Reporting Process in E -gov and pdf Chart Identifying Process
• Draft for Safety Committee Review RE: Hazardous Chemicals (MSDS Sheets)
• Animal Control
Human Resources:
Recruiting /Employment — Existing Unfilled Positions
Recruitment
Filled or Recruiting
Traffic Intern
Recruiting
Deputy City Attomey
Recruiting
Accounting Technician
Recruiting
Temp. Help Desk Technician
Filled
Building Official
Filled
Public Information:
Key Reporting Areas
■ Media relations
• Media contacts: 43 (does not include those that were subsequently referred to another City
resource)
• Media releases & traffic: 22 Media Releases, 8 SnowInfo, 3 Traffic Alerts, 9 Calendar Requests
for a total of 42
• Total media stories: 157 city stories plus 133 police activity stories (does not include ads nor all
television /radio /web) for a total of 290
• Earned media stories: 29 (does not include all television /radio /web)
• Hot Topic Community ENewsletter Subscribers: 506
• Hot Topic Community Newsletter Distribution: 20,000
Public Information, cont:
OTHER:
Citizen contacts: 113
• Website Updates: 12 plus 42 media release postings (not including PIO- initiated or those by departments
with their own posting authority)
• Areas of Significant focus:
• Snow info
• Public Works Projects meetings and mailers
• City Hall at the Mall
• State o f the City preparation
Web Site
Web Site Summary
Apr
May
Jun
2nd Quarter 2012
Year to Date
Unique User Sessions
9919
10610
11718
60686
Top Five Pages Viewed
Employment
4912
4911
4984
32014
Parks & Rec
1425
1880
2633
8841
Police
1277
1312
1407
8366
Maps
1043
933
985
6106
Planning
994
1144
882
5979
Top Five "Referrer" Web Sites
Spokane County — employment
1041
1174
1045
6290
Municipal Research (MRSC)
363
198
183
1791
County Ideas
91
131
102
712
WM NW
99
129
85
649
Google
239
23
79
402
Central Reception:
Business Registration
1800
1500
1400
1200
1000
800
500
400
200
Call Volume
New & Renewed Business Licenses
New Renew
tlstQtr
f2nd Qtr
Visitor Volume
Spokane Valley C.A.R.E.S — April - 56 May - 44 June — 656 (Year to Date - 572)
TOTALS
M isc
Street Sweeping
Illicit Discharge
Graffiti
Landscaping ROW
Stormwater /erosion
Traffic - various
Signs
Road hazard
Animal Removal
Potholes
Gravel Shouldering
0 10 20 30 40 s0 60 7■
6
44
5
s
s
14
1
2
O
4
O
O
1
O
O
4
2
0
3
O
2
■June
6
■ May
8
10
■ Apri I
1
9
13
8
4
3
8
4
4
6
8
0
O
2
0 10 20 30 40 s0 60 7■
+�� e
PARKS AND RECREATION
*64-6 ne
SECOND QUARTER REPORT
/Valle °d
y APRIL -JUNE 2012
ADMINISTRATION AND PARKS:`
• The long awaited Grand Opening of Greenacres '
Park took place on Saturday, June 2, at 10:30 a.m. Festivities began
with a family walk around the new pathway and a tree planting by the
City Council. An official opening ceremony and ribbon cutting followed.
There were informational booths and crafts and games for the kids. A
highlight was introducing the game of disc golf to the community and
having the Mayor and City Manager giving it a whirl.
• Staff continued to work with Mike Terrell, our consultant for the City
Signage project for the west gateway entry to our city. This project will
go to bid in early August
• We have contracted with T.C. Sherry & Associates for two construction projects:
o The Terrace View Playground Replacement Project consists of replacing the existing
playground equipment and the addition of a new accessible walkway. Play structures have
been chosen and the project will go out for bids in July.
o The CenterPlace South Landscape Development Project will turf, landscape, and irrigate the
remaining portion of our campus just east of Discovery Playground. Based upon many
requests from citizens and our growing needs to accommodate groups (especially birthday
parties), two smaller shelters and picnic tables will be installed and available for reservations
next year.
• Our Park Ambassador is back on board for the summer. This position has proven to be invaluable as
a direct liaison with the citizens, and we are always improving things based on this feedback. This
position acts as our "eyes and ears" and helps educate the public of park rules and regulations,
informs and shares area information, and ensures reservations and activities are running smoothly.
Preserving and protecting our parks and facilities has become a large part of the position, as the
public creates many challenging and criminal situations.
• Staff has been involved with the Library Interlocal meetings and the discussions surrounding the
possible purchase of an 8 -acres parcel adjacent to Balfour Park.
• Interviews were conducted with several consultant firms responding to our Request for
Qualifications for updating our existing Parks and Recreation Master Plan. We selected and
contracted with Studio Cascade for this project.
• Staff collaborated on renewing and reducing the lease contract with Splash Down.
• A contract and work was completed with Northwest Fence Inc. for repair of the Police Precinct
perimeter fence.
• Staff continues to participate on the Project Sports 2012 Vision Team coordinated by the Spokane
Regional Sports Commission.
• The Parks and Recreation Department budget for 2012 was prepared for the June 12 Budget
Retreat.
• Staff has been working on HVAC contract renewals for CenterPlace and the Police Precinct.
• The turf at Greenacres continues to be a problem. Staff is working with the contractor for a
solution.
• Staff has been working with State Parks on a riverbank repair project along the Centennial Trail.
• We are happy to see even more people enjoying and using our parks, and shelter reservations are
increasing. We are frequently receiving positive feedback for our parks and especially for the new
Greenacres Park and Discovery Playground.
CENTERPLACE:
• Staff is working with Valleyfest organizers to coordinate all of the activities that will be held on
CenterPlace grounds and be a liaison for the overall event. This year's CenterPlace activities include:
Car Show, Babyfest (first time event), Step Up for Down's Syndrome Walk (first time event), hot air
balloon release, pancake breakfast, planetarium, Comedy Club (nationally televised), Great Room
patio entertainment, and Taste of the Valley wine tasting event.
DS Connections has partnered with Valleyfest to utilize Discovery Playground to start their Step Up
for Down's Syndrome walk. This group formerly held the event at Riverpoint in Coeur d'Alene and is
hoping to grow their event by having it in Spokane Valley. This is the only walk of its kind in the
northwest and is expected to draw many people from around the region to attend. DS Connections
has a strong desire to have their participants enjoy a weekend full of events so we have been
working with Valleyfest to change the date of some of the events so that people can stay to take part
in multiple events; the walk will be on Saturday, and the bike race and possibly a triathlon will take
place on Sunday.
• Staff attended a Washington Recreation and Park Association Conference in Bellevue in May. The
conference provided many opportunities for education information, teambuilding, training, marketing
and networking.
• CenterPlace hosted its largest event to date. The four -hour event in May was held by RM Motivation
and attracted over 2000 people from throughout the region. The group has already reserved our
facility for another event in 2013 and extended the event to eight hours.
• Staff took 147 CenterPlace reservations this quarter for events in 2012 and 2013. We have 718
reservations already booked for 2012 which is 105 more over the same time period last year. The
most significant increases in reservations have been in business meetings.
• Red Rock Catering, a subsidiary of the Glover Mansion, is in their third year as our non - exclusive food
and beverage caterer. This partnership has been well received by our business customers that are
looking for consistency and quality in their food choices. They are also becoming a regular choice for
wedding receptions and private party groups who chose to bring their own food in the past. Red
Rock is also working with us to provide events such as Valleyfest and Breakfast with Santa. Having
an in -house caterer has proven to be beneficial to provide a seamless experience for customers as
we work very closely with them to ensure the success of an event.
RECREATION AND AQUATICS:
• Staff conducted multiple interviews for the summer staff. We hired and trained 11 Recreation
Assistants, including an Intern, for our Summer Program staff. They will be conducting the
Summer Day Camp and Free Park Programs.
• The Counselor in Training Program began again with 12 youth participating. The teens learn
all aspects of working with children in a Day Camp setting, including leadership,
communication, planning, safety, and fun, of course.
• Staff attended the statewide Washington Recreation and Parks Association Annual Conference
in Bellevue, WA. Jennifer Papich, our Recreation Coordinator, is Treasurer of the organization.
• Registering online for recreation programs has been popular. There were 171 registrations for
this quarter totaling $16,530.
• Our office has been a hub of activity preparing for the summer season and getting it started
again. The swimming pools opened for the season on June 16. The Summer Day Camp and
free Summer Parks Programs began for the summer on June 18.
There were 5,287 open swim visits in June, compared to 4,859 last year.
June swim lesson registrations were 350 people equaling $10,495, compared to 209 last year.
• The swim team registrations for June were 102 people equaling $3,570, down slightly from
last year.
• The free Summer Park Program at Valley Mission, Terrace View, and Greenacres was attended
by 424 children /teens in June. Our enthusiastic summer Parks and Recreation staff lead
games, arts, crafts, and other fun activities in the morning.
The June Summer Day Camp participants totaled 95 for the first two weeks.
3
SENIOR CENTER:
• April was Volunteer Appreciation Month. The Senior Center
Association treated the volunteers to lunch at Timber Creek
Buffet. There were 56 attendees out of approximately 75
active volunteers.
• The Association continues to work with Spokane Valley
Partners in providing donations of books, games, etc.
The monthly newsletter includes articles to inform members
of Valley Partners' needs for the community. We also list the monthly Character Trait of the
Month, working with Central Valley School District. In April, we published emergency exits for
the first and second floors of CenterPlace, and each activity leader was informed about proper
procedures for exiting the building in case of emergency.
• The Greenhouse held the annual plant sale prior to Mother's Day, plus held sales every
Monday and Thursday throughout June. We appreciate the loyal volunteers who enjoy
working with the plants.
Several people took advantage of free tune -ups offered
by Bates Pharmacy on walkers and wheelchairs. The Senior
Center also benefitted, as the board purchased three battery -
operated scooters and one electric wheelchair was donated.
On our busiest days, all scooters are in use and very
appreciated by the senior users who cannot walk the
distances of the hallways.
• Each month AARP offers a driver's refresher course for personally owned vehicles, and most
insurances offer a discount to those who have completed the class.
• Nintendo Wii bowling is still growing with 10 -15 people playing in the reception area each
week. There is a monthly tournament which includes other senior centers and retirement
communities in Spokane Valley and Spokane.
• The lobby area has been spiffied up with some framed
historical Spokane Valley photos, new wall pamphlet holders,
a new coffee service table, and a nice area rug. The
reception area offers a cozy and restful spot for folks to
gather.
• Attendance counts were: April (3,165); May (3,571); and
June (2,811). These totals do not include the walk -ins we
have each day.
New member counts were: April (22); May (30); and June (16).
4
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: August 14, 2012 Department Director Approval
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ® executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: EXECUTIVE SESSION: Review Performance of Public Employee
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: [(RCW 42.30.110(1)(g))]
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND:
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: "I Move that Council adjourn into executive session
for approximately forty -five minutes to review the performance of a public employee, and that no
action will be taken upon return to open session."
BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT:
ATTACHMENTS: