Loading...
2012, 07-31 Study Session Minutes MINUTES SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STUDY SESSION FORMAT Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers Spokane Valley,Washington July 31,2012 6:00 p.m. Attendance: Councilmembers Staff Torn Towey,Mayor Mike Jackson, City Manager Gary Schimmels,Deputy Mayor Cary Driskell, City Attorney Dean Grafos, CounciImember Mike Stone,Parks&Recreation Director Brenda Grassel, Councilmember Mark Calhoun,Finance Director Chuck Hafner, Councilmember John Hohman, Community Development Dir Ben Wick, Councilmember Scott Kuhta,Planning Manager Arne Woodard, Councilmember Mike Basinger, Senior Planner Steve Worley, Senior Engineer Morgan Koudelka, Sr.Administrative Analyst Greg Bingaman,IT Specialist Carolbelle Branch,Public Information Officer Carrie Koudelka,Deputy City Clerk Mayor Towey called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the amended agenda. ROLL CALL:Deputy City Clerk Koudelka called the roll; all Councilmembers were present. 1. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 12-018 CPA 05-12—Mike Basinger After Deputy City Clerk Koudelka read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, and seconded to approve ordinance 12-018, Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 05-12. Community Development Director Holman informed Council that staff updated the development agreement based on the results of last week's meeting and the realization that the developer wanted to put dwelling units within five feet of the setback area. He said they looked at the setbacks and staff recommends a ten-foot setback. He said he discussed it with the developer who agreed to the stipulation. He said now the agreement calls for a six-foot high fence, a five-foot landscape buffer and an additional ten-foot setback before the beginning of any dwelling unit. Mr. Hohman said the developer has accepted and signed the agreement. Mayor Towey invited public comment: Richard Wilcox - 16120 E Broadway: said he would like to know the reasoning as to why we have standards that are not adhered to and he would like clarification. Sheryl McManamon - 504 N Conklin Rd: said that if we widen her street due to the increased traffic, it will cause her and her neighbors to have less than a forty-foot setback in front of her house. She asked that if it is necessary to widen Conklin that it be to the minimum amount necessary for car safety. She also asked that we install signs limiting traffic to residential access and no semi-trucks; and that construction trucks only use Broadway to access the project property. Douglas Florence - 415 N. Moore Rd: said he did not hear that we did a traffic analysis for safety purposes on Moore and Broadway. Catherine Potter - 622 N Moore Rd.: Thanked Council and staff for working so hard on the project and granting additional time to work through it. She said she is in favor of rezoning to MF2 with no bonus density and said a stair-stepping transition is the best option for the neighborhood. She requests that the developer agreement specify single-story units in the buffer zone. Delbert Liljegren- 418 N. Moore Rd: said he wants to work with the builders and appreciates the plan to develop luxury apartments. He said he strongly requests the developer allow neighborhood Council Study Session Minutes 07-31-12 Page 1 of 7 Approved by Council:08-14-12 representatives to meet with the developer to work with the plans and concepts as they are finalized. He said the neighborhood is concerned that they have not seen final plans. Councilmember Woodard said he agrees that construction vehicles should use Broadway. He said we did a traffic analysis and our traffic engineer presented it.He said he believes we need to give creative leeway to the developer but he urges the developer to meet with neighbors about proposed concepts and that the ten-foot buffer helps. Councilmember Grafos said he will vote for the project because it meets the criteria for a zone change and he said he thinks the developer agreement is fair on both sides and the ten-foot setback is reasonable. He said the project will generate revenue for the City. Councilmember Hafner said the ten-foot setback solves some of the concerns he had. Councilmember Wick said the agreement makes a good transition and compromise between the developer and the neighborhood. Mayor Towey said he thinks they came up with the best developer agreement possible. Vote by acclamation: In Favor: Mayor Towey, Deputy Mayor Schrmels, Councihnembers Grafos, Hafizer, Wick, and Woodard Opposed: Councilmember Grassel. Motion carried. 2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 12-019 CPA 05-12 Zoning Map—Mike Basinger After Deputy City Clerk Koudelka read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to approve Ordinance 12-019 to update the Official Zoning Map for Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 05-12. Senior Planner Basinger explained the ordinance changes the zoning map to coincide with the Comprehensive Plan amendment just passed by Council. Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried 3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 12-020 SVMC 8.25 Solicitation Exceptions—Cary Driskell After Deputy City Clerk Koudelka read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to adopt ordinance 12-020 amending SVMC 8.25.025 relating to solicitation from vehicle occupants. Legal Intern Stolz said that when Council adopted the current solicitation ordinance, it contained an exception for special permits to, under certain conditions, engage in charitable solicitation from vehicles in the right-of-way. When the City amended SVMC 5.15 to remove such permits, language in SVMC 8.25.025 pertaining to charitable solicitation became unnecessary, along with a provision that pertains to parks that is now irrelevant. Ms. Stolz went on to say that staff looked at another provision in SVMC 8.25.025C2b that defines "prohibitive roadway" as including the first five feet beyond the edge of a paved shoulder where there is no sidewalk. Staff recommends amending that provision to state that it "includes paved shoulders and bike lanes." Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by acclamation:In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried. 4.Bid Award, Phase 2 Preservation—Steve Worley It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to award the 2012 Street Preservation Project- Phase 2 to the lowest responsible bidder, Spokane Rock Products, in the amount of$679,475.50. Senior Engineer Worley said they had a successful bid opening and received bids from five bidders; Spokane Rock Products was the lowest bidder and he recommends we award them the contract. Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered. Councilmember Wick asked if there is a plan for the money left over from the difference between the engineer estimate and the bid award. Mr. Worley said there are still projects for which we can use that money but it is hard to predict winter weather so some of those projects may not happen this year. He said there is about $400,000 left over from the $2.5 million approved by Council for street preservation. He said he will verify those numbers but the intent is to spend as much pavement preservation money as possible this year. Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. 5. Contract Amendment, Sullivan Road Bridge Design—Steve Worley It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute Contract Supplement #4 with CH2M Hill in the Amount of$997,850.00 for the final design phase Council Study Session Minutes 07-31-12 Page 2 of 7 Approved by Council:08-14-12 • of the Sullivan Road West Bridge Replacement Project#0155. Senior Engineer Worley said the has been working with CH2M Hill for the design of the Sullivan Bridge. He said they started with a survey for the project last fall and they have had several addendums since then. He said the preliminary design phase included open houses to discuss staging and he explained the supplements. He said Supplement 4 is for the final design of the bridge and is actually for$997,851.00. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schinunels, seconded and unanimously agreed to amend the motion by changing the dollar amount to $997,851.00. Mr. Worley explained the project funding to date and said they added the study of a pedestrian bridge under the main bridge. He said this option narrows the main bridge a little because it reduces the size of the sidewalks and it provides a direct connection between Centennial Trail and Sullivan Park. He said this supplemental does not include the design of the pedestrian bridge. Councilmember Woodard asked if we are required to put temporary pedestrian access across the river during construction. Mr. Worley said we are and we would likely build a temporary bridge on the upstream side of the northbound bridge. Mr. Worley said the final design cost is $857,791.00 and optional services include an additional open house, bridge visual simulation, Sullivan Park water main, illumination, park/trailhead irrigation, improved river access and a ten percent management reserve fund. He said these costs are not covered by federal grants so the City would be responsible to pay for these items. He said the location of the improved river access has not been determined but he said he thinks it is important to put the river access point at Sullivan Park and they are talking to the Park department and river users to determine the best site. Mr. Worley said staff recommends moving ahead with all optional design services. Councilmember Wick said there seems to be a trend around the region to incorporate artistic elements to bridge designs. Mr. Worley said staff is not currently looking at artistic concepts but they can add that to the scope. He said we haven't looked at artistic features because we want to get a federal grant to help pay for the bridge replacement. City Manager Jackson reminded Council that every added feature is a use of preservation dollars. Councilmember Hafiier inquired as to the status of the bridge today.Mr.Worley said there are no changes, an inspection is scheduled for October and he will update Council based on that inspection. Councilmember Grassel asked why the staff costs are included in the supplement. Mr. Worley said we have a project manager who works with the consultant on the project, and that eighty percent of staff cost is paid by the grant. Councilmember Grassel asked what the open house costs include. Mr. Worley said it includes costs for materials used for presenting the project, drawings, PowerPoints and other materials. Councilmember Grassel asked what the current REET fund status is. Finance Director Calhoun said the doesn't have that information at his fingertips but he will forward an analysis to Council. He said although REET funds are down, they continue to come in. City Manager Jackson said REET funds are down about $1,000,000, and that there are fewer grants to apply for but he said we can also use REET funds for preservation. Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered. Couneilmember Grafos said that because we are spending $1.5 million with CH2M Hill, they should be willing to throw in design elements as a good faith gesture based on how much we spend with them. Mr. Worley said we are looking to add architectural detail but to hire someone to do artwork is not something we had been considering. Deputy Mayor Schimmels said he does not want to add artwork. Vote by acclamation:In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None, Motion carried. Mayor Towey called for a break at 7:37 p.in. The meeting reconvened at 7:50 p.in. 6.Extension of Time for Economic Development Ad Hoc Committee—Councilmember Wick It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to extend the thnefi•ame of the Economic Development Ad Hoc Committee to the end of November or sooner if the committee feels they have satisfied their directive. Councilmember Wick said the committee has been working very hard and they are receiving feedback from stakeholders, and the committee would like more time to keep working. Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried. Council Study Session Minutes 07-31-12 Page 3 of 7 Approved by Council:08-14-12 7.Decant Facility—Steve Worley Senior Engineer Worley went through his presentation and said the preferred stormwater maintenance schedule is to clean catch basins every three years, drywells every three to seven years, and curb and sidewalk inlets every three to seven years; however, he said there are too many out there and we are not able to reach that preferred schedule. He said in 2010 hauling cost was $71,673 but with a decant facility, proposed hauling decant cost would be reduced to $11,761. He said we would be able to clean more in one day if we had a decant facility. He said we received a grant for$980,000 for an elaborate mechanical system, but the current proposal will not be that expensive. He said the Ecology grant will pay seventy- five percent with a twenty-five percent local match. Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) could share the cost of that local match but they would need to partner with us prior to June, 2013. He said we have an opportunity to partner with WSDOT and there are other entities in the region with the same need including the Department of Ecology, Spokane County and Spokane. Ecology has grant funds to locate three facilities: Mead, Spokane's Playfair site, and the WSDOT Pines Maintenance yard, and a future site in West Plains. Possible decant locations for Spokane Valley are the Euclid site and the WSDOT Pines site. He said he prefers the WSDOT site off Pines and Montgomery because it is centrally located and has nearby I-90 access. He said WSDOT likes that site as well and he said WSDOT has already prepared an environmental agreement for that site. The next step is to issue an RFQ (Request for Qualifications)for a consultant to design a facility to be most effective and most efficient for Spokane Valley and WSDOT. In the meantime,he said we would need an interlocal with WSDOT for maintenance and operations. WSDOT recommends we select the consultant. Mr. Worley said WSDOT is not an acceptable recipient for state grant funds as they are a state agency so Spokane Valley would be the lead agency on the grant proposal. He said WSDOT is also not able to manage the project due to staffing levels so we would partner with WSDOT for land and try for local matching funds. Councilmember Wick asked if we have the same flexibility to accommodate a growing city if the facility is not on City-owned property. Mr. Worley said the consultant will look at current and future needs, future expansion and our ability to clean stormwater structures. Councilmember Woodard asked how we will handle liability issues. City Manager Jackson said that those terms are negotiated. Councilmember Wick asked if the RFQ would include our Euclid site. Mr. Worley said it would only look at the four that are on the WSDOT sites unless there is some reason Council thinks we should look at the Euclid site because both City and WSDOT staff believe the WSDOT Pines site is the better location and WSDOT is willing to provide the property for it. Mr. Worley said we can start the process of selecting the consultant and have them review the best location and in the meantime start developing an interlocal agreement for the operations and maintenance of the facility. Mr. Worley said we should have that agreement in place before we go to the design, construction and use of the facility. Councilmember Wick said he would like us to include our Euclid site. Councilmember Grafos said the thinks we should move forward with an interlocal agreement with WSDOT to make sure we are not expanding Spokane Valley staff and said if we are looking to buy any equipment in the near future we should be looking at buying snowplows and not vactoring trucks. He said he is in favor of moving forward provided WSDOT operates and maintains the facility and equipment. Councilmember Hafner said he thinks it would be time and money consuming to evaluate the Euclid property if staff has already determined the WSDOT Pines location is the best site. Mr. Worley proposed we go forward with the RFQ, select a consultant and have them start evaluating the WSDOT site, staff will start work on the interlocal agreement and if we can't come to an agreement we have the option to then amend the consultant contract to include the Euclid site. Mayor Towey said he thinks we should move forward as proposed by Mr.Worley;there was no objection from Council. 8.Animal Control—Morgan KoudeIka Senior Administrative Analyst Koudelka said staff received responses to the RFP (Request for Proposal) for Animal Control Services from Spokane County SCRAPS (Spokane County Regional Animal Protection Service) and SpokAnimal. He said as the presents a summary of the two proposals he would like Council input as to Council priorities and their most important factors for animal control services so he can further analyze both proposals based on the priorities of Council. He then went through the PowerPoint presentation and said the RFP included six evaluation categories: 1) Level of Service 2) Adoption Programs 3) Ability to Enforce Regulations 4) Financial Stability 5) Professionalism and 6) Council Study Session Minutes 07-31-12 Page 4 of 7 Approved by Council:08-14-12 Cost. Mr. Koudelka asked Council to tell him of the six categories, which are most important, weighted heavier, or if there are other considerations they would like staff to incorporate into the evaluation. Councilmember Hafner asked what the financial stability of SCRAPS has to do with Spokane Valley. Mr. Koudelka said the reason that is included is to make sure the organizations are financially sound. City Manager Jackson said the process is to look at both agencies equally and part of the consideration in any long-term provider is the financial stability of the agency. Mr. Koudelka said SCRAPS is part of the general fund of Spokane County and they share common resources with several other departments and as any government agency, especially when times are tight, they make difficult decisions regarding the funding level of various services they provide. He said we can request the service levels we expect to receive on our contracts, but it is the County's prerogative to make funding decisions based on their resources. Councilmember Hafner said with regard to "Contractor Relationship" on slide 19, he does not like the negative connotation of the comment that Spokane Valley has had unresolved billing disputes with the County. Mr. Jackson said staff provided the same information for SpokAnimal and gave an objective comparison and Council will draw from it what they will. Councilmember Grasse] said she thinks it is important to have all the facts and asked how many staff both organizations have. Mr. Koudelka read the Iist of positions from the SpokAnimal proposal and said they also have a clinic and a humane service physician in addition to the animal shelter and animal control services so some of the positions serve functions that are outside those for which we would be contracting. He then read the list of positions for SCRAPS. He said both organizations heavily utilize volunteers: SCRAPS has 185 active volunteers and SpokAnimal has 300. Councilmember Woodard said he would like to have copies of both RFP's so he can study then. Mr. Jackson reminded Council that a copy is available in the City Clerk's office and said we can reproduce and distribute the proposals if Council wishes. Mr. Koudelka again asked Council for input as to their priorities and what they want staff to consider. Councilmember Wick said he thinks we should use the list as identified in going forward. Mr. Koudelka asked if staff should consider the items with equal weight or if any specific areas weigh differently. Councilmember Woodard said to change the evaluation categories would be unfair to both organizations and said the process for the relinquishing of pets is an important part of the adoption process. He said cost is not the only factor; he would like to compare the two proposals and said that the level of service ranks three or four on his list and cost is the least important factor to consider. Councilmember Grafos said he wants a copy of the SCRAPS proposal before he is comfortable making a twenty-year decision. He said the three items that are important to him are the financial stability, the ability to enforce and the size and capacity of the facility. He said a depreciation formula on the cost of the building rather than a cost of living increase for twenty years would be more reasonable. Councilmember Hafner said he does not care for summaries because they don't give the details. He said he wants copies of the proposals. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schiznmels, seconded, and rnzanimously agreed to extend the meeting one hour. Mayor Towey suggested Council take the time to read the RFP's to help make their decision. Mr. Jackson said staff will make copies of the proposals for Council and said we need to think about how we evaluate the proposals. He said typically on an RFQ (or RFP), the proposals are not provided to Council and that administratively staff reviews the proposals and provides a summary to Council. He said he wants to review the process before moving forward and said we may need to alter our steps. He said we will come back for further discussion on August 21st. Mr. Koudelka said we are trying to accommodate the County's timeline because they have an arrangement on the Trent building whereby they will start incurring penalties the end of August so we are trying to let them know our decision as soon as possible. However,he said, it is paramount that Council fully consider the options and that they have all the information to make a good decision. He said they will try to work within the timeline the County has requested but we will also ensure that Council has all the information needed. He said when Council is at the point they feel they are ready to make a decision, staff will make a recommendation to Council which they can choose to accept, reject, or pursue a different arrangement. If Council decides to go with one of the options, staff will work on the terms of the contract with the chosen provider and if we are unable to do so we would have the option of going with the other provider. Mayor Towey said if Spokane opts not to go regional, all of the numbers we've been given in the SCRAPS proposal are wiped out. Mr. Koudelka explained the proposal from SCRAPS is a regional model and that Council Study Session Minutes 07-31-12 Page 5 of 7 Approved by Council:08-14-12 if Spokane chooses not to participate they would revert to the current usage based, settle and adjust model. Councilmember Wick said he would weigh the six evaluation categories equally. 9.I-Pad Purchases and Use—Greg Bingaman IT Specialist Bingaman said members of Council voiced interest in purchasing I-Pads for use. I-Pads would be used primarily for agenda packets but have several other features that he demonstrated to Council. He said the total cost to purchase I-Pads for Council and directors would run between $7,520.72 and $8,950.92 plus $8,712 annually for cellular service. Mayor Towey asked when the current lease for Council laptops expires and how the cost of the lease compares to purchasing I-Pads. Mr. Bingaman said he will provide that information to Council. He said he plans to repurpose the current laptops in other areas, replacing older models. He said we would continue our current lease and purchase I-Pads at the same time. He said we can't get out of our lease and that we are in our first year of a three-year lease. Councilmember Grafos said we have an expensive lease and it would cost us $16,000.00 the first year to purchase I-Pads, accessories and service; therefore,he would decline the I-Pad but thinks it is a good idea for the directors who need to access information quickly. Councilmember Wick said the cost looks to be $7,000 to $9,000 and a use for repurposing the Iaptops has been identified and he said he thinks we probably wouldn't replace laptops for the directors so that would reduce the number from eleven to seven. He said he doesn't think Council needs the cellular service because they have cell phones, so that would reduce the cost as well. Mayor Towey said he has a concern the current laptops would not be utilized if Council switched to I-Pads. Councilmember Hafner said there are four members of Council who don't use their laptops now that we are currently spending money for. City Manager Jackson asked if Council wants staff to continue to research the purchase or drop the topic altogether. Councilmember Woodard said he doesn't want to spend the money for I-Pads if they won't be utilized. Councilmember Hafner agrees. Mayor Towey said he would like to get more information about the savings versus cost before making a decision; no objection from Council. Mr. Bingaman said he will bring more information back to Council at a future date. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to extend the meeting one hour. Vote by acclamation: In Favor: Mayor Towey, Deputy Mayor Schimmels, Councilmembers Grafos, Grassed, Hafiter and Wick Opposed: Councilmember Woodard. Motion carried. 10.Economic Development Committee Update—John Hohman Community Development Director Hohman said the committee has met five times, the first two meetings were to set the ground rules and the direction and the following three meetings they have been given presentations by the groups they are researching. He said the first meeting of presentations was sports related, the second related to tourism, the latest meeting was about river users. He said the committee decided on four questions to ask each group relating to economic development. He said the next meeting is this Thursday and it has to do with business and workforce development. He said they plan to have a couple meetings on land use issues, one focused on city regulations and zoning and another focused on what larger developers are looking for from our processes. He said the committee would meet again to determine where the focus should be and will bring that information back to Council for review. Councilmember Grassel said the purpose of the committee is not to come back to Council with what they should do, but to provide an exhaustive list of information they gathered to assist Council with future planning. 11. Advance Agenda—Mayor Towey No comments. 12. The Gateway Project, Finance Monthly Report and Sprague Swale Project Update were for information only and were not reported on or discussed. 13. Council Check in—Mayor Towey No comments. Council Study Session Minutes 07-31-12 Page 6 of 7 Approved by Council:08-14-12 14. City Manager Comments—Mike Jackson No comments. 15. Executive Session: Labor Negotiations FRCW 42.30.140(4)1 and Pending/Potential Litigation IRCW 42.30.110(1)(i)1 It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schinnnels, seconded and unanimously agreed to aCjourn into executive session for approximately forty-five minutes to discuss pending/potential litigation and labor negotiations and that no action will be taken upon return to open session. Council adjourned into Executive Session at 10:06 p.m. At 10:45pm., City Attorney Driskell announced the meeting was extended fifteen minutes to 11:00 p.m. At 11:00 p.m., City Attorney Driskell announced the meeting was extended fifteen minutes to 11:15 p.m. At 11:15 p.m., City Attorney Driskell announced the meeting was extended fifteen minutes to 11:30 p.m. At 11:30 p.m., Mayor Towey declared Council out of Executive Session and immediately thereafter, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. / f ATT Thomas E. To vey,Mayor fJ • ‘ 1 (f- hristine Bainbridge, City Clerk Council Study Session Minutes 07-31-12 Page 7 of 7 Approved by Council:08-14-12 AMENDED AGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION FORMAT Tuesday,July 31, 2012 6:00 p.m. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11707 East Sprague Avenue,First Floor (Please Silence Your Cell Phones During the Meeting) DISCUSSION LEADER SUBJECT/ACTIVITY GOAL ROLL CALL ACTION ITEMS: 1.Mike Basinger Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 12-018 Approval Consideration For CPA 05-012 [public comment] 2, Mike Basinger Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 12-019 Approval Consideration CPA 05-12,Zoning Map [public comment] 3. Cary Driskell Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 12-020 Approval Consideration SVMC 8.25 Solicitation Exceptions [public comment] 4. Steve Worley Bid Award,Phase 2 Preservation Motion Consideration [public comment] 5. Steve Worley Contract Amendment, Sullivan Road Motion Consideration Bridge Design [public comment] 6. Councilmember Wick Extension of Time for Economic Develop- Motion Consideration ment Ad Hoc Committee [public comment] NON-ACTION ITEMS: 7. Steve Worley Decant Facility Discussion/Information 8.Morgan Koudelka Animal Control Discussion/Information 9. Greg Bingaman Ipad Purchases and Use Discussion/Information 10.John Hohman Economic Development Committee Update Discussion/Information 11.Mayor Towey Advance Agenda Discussion/Information 12. Information Only(will not be discussed or reported): (a) Gateway Project; (b)Finance Monthly Report; (c) Sprague Swale Project Update 13.Mayor Towey Council Check-in Discussion/Information 14,Mike Jackson City Manager Comments Discussion/Information 15. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Labor Negotiations [RCW 42.30.140(4)] and Pending/Potential Litigation [(RCW 42.30.110(1 Xi)] ADJOURN Note: Unless otherwise noted above,there will be no public comments at Council Study Sessions. However,Council always reserves the right to request information from the public and staff as appropriate. During meetings held by the City of Spokane Valley Council,the Council reserves the right to take"action"on any item listed or subsequently added to the agenda. The term"action"means to deliberate,discuss,review,consider,evaluate, or make a collective positive or negative decision. NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical,hearing,or other impairments,please contact the City Clerk at(509)921-1000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made. Study Session Agenda,July 31,2012 Page 1 of t Item 4 CITY or SPOKANE VALLEY • Request for Council Action Meeting Date: July 31, 2012 Department Director Approval: ❑ Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business [ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration; 2012 Street Preservation —Phase 2 Bid Award GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: March 27, 2012 council approved the Pavement Management Plan Update for 2011; April 10, 2012 council approved $2.8 million dollars for street preservation projects in 2012; May 15, 2012 Admin Report on status of the 2012 Street Preservation Projects; June 12, 2012 Admin Report on 2012 Street Preservation Projects Update; July 3, 2012 Info item on the 2012 Street Preservation Projects Update. BACKGROUND: Council approved the Pavement Management Plan Update for 2011 which included a list of recommended street preservation projects for 2012. Council also approved $2.8 million to pay for street preservation projects in 2012. The 2012 Street Preservation Project ® Phase 2 is one of the street preservation projects. 2012 Street Preservation Project e Phase 2: The project includes the following streets: Fancher Rd - Sprague Ave. to Broadway Ave. 2" grind and inlay Replace SB vehicle detection loops on Fancher Rd at Sprague Avenue. Install ITS conduit from Sprague Ave. to Broadway Ave. Update pedestrian ramps to current Argonne Rd - Indiana Ave. thru Montgomery Ave. 2" grind and inlay of pavement failure areas University Rd from Sprague Ave. to Main Ave. 2" grind and inlay Replace SB vehicle detection loops on University Rd at Sprague Avenue. Update pedestrian ramps to current Mission Ave from Union Rd. to Pines Rd. 2" grind and inlay The Phase 2 project went to bid on Friday, July 13. The bid opening is scheduled for Friday, July 27 and work is anticipated to begin the last week of August or first week of September. OPTIONS: 1) Award the 2012 Street Preservation Project — Phase 2 to the lowest responsible bidder (the project bid tabs will be available at the Council Meeting) or 2) provide additional direction to staff. item 4 RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move to Award the 2012 Street Preservation Project — Phase 2 to the lowest responsible bidder, Spokane Rock Products, in the amount of $679,475.50. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Council approved $2.8 million dollars for street preservation projects in 2012. Below is the summary of proposed expenditures and estimates to date. These estimates are preliminary and subject to change based on final construction quantities and as designs are finalized and bid. Project(Bids Completed) Est. Expenditures Phase 1 $723,880 Evergreen Rd (16th to 32"`x) $106,402 Subtotal $830,282 Project(To be Bid) Est. Expenditures Phase 2 $960,649 (Engrs Est.) University Overlay (4th to 16th) $226,481 Sprague Ave (Park to Thierman) $623,338 Subtotal $1,810,468 Grand Total $2,640,750 STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Worley, Senior Capital Projects Engineer ATTACHMENTS: �i I''I4+s1��o0°00.0�°0.°0°0°0°00000000000000000000 00000000000000- �GM�, fQE�II�I�� ,� -oo 0000 000.moo oo oo Mw oo woo oo o000000o-0000 II c°6)o .u>`r:oa;d ddo�ioui�.=�oui m�a3conoo.maid ooa v��o<..ioo Wy� t MwNmMmm.UCM VONWOV<m I W<Etv<o.TNO< 8 p ocw.loway0 mo -.n._W en>✓m mm rr`Mm<ncvN 04°.°WNVO _ EQ U ^��U i��V� NA« < <IDmY NO <N =,...,_ m<10M1 .C< rig,NN..,,.. 9 . _ ld �I++I�.41'I�u1i V I il'iili4'�I. m W .,"_11 F4YY.I �dY ', NN NNNNNNNNNNNNNm NN CO NNNNCNNN•NN.AN N NNNNM.+III w I' 1�191,vimvivi$m Wo..000e000.. ...��,,h�l�l Y y Jfl .-.d eiv mBN<Nanm e°ic°°q°o, n �vB -,77,':1"--mm°<ki'ai g'48 1 I ._ 1 ,'l N N v 11�11(IC�II ;. ..... ....NNNW.�.p.N.NNNNNNNNNNN .......N. . 11��1'�IO N ' IyI�RR , .9 N 4: I �III V<•I ° 6,SO76OlA 066006.040 < OO00006Ow000w OOO WOO�Wro00.0 r 0. �A 1,� I �tC 111 ow MOO t°a°�'m")m)"M8F+S. 92 °mg.m-m°w°NNNQ wm 2tin°v$CC II. 'D S .+ r o • i FIIId , C.N;q.v. NNM g_e,m. N <h<N.00 MN 4.-Wb Wmwt.�<NNmN ^ ...:J 4+/L4^ ...WF^7F J.. .1 0. F I�,t �IU'IJ�,< a� :.Q 1 ....H V Z ^:h I d fillll�}li 'o -. O• II J II�I�� ..mm Ntn .... V1NCA ................... Nmm•Nm Om 1I`l'}'ll �J,�� �y2\ Q CO e' 1 i, I�r 00.nui°.°.°OOmSB ° oeoeoe o0°o21.s!t r8moo°omN�IrJI 4'0 'VP:2Y L '';0 'I+SI - .... ..,,-..10...01-,4-c000mo W0..OGrObO,.....g., T0C, v \PS'O' (0 a 4�Y� 1� <..4 b< w N.-v`.�w M ... II�b1111 <. li111 ..'it N N000000CCU)000 NNN 0000 ,...nm.00.n.n000000 mN j�117�;111;11 u�'{, !'"i0000000°0°000°OOO°o6Om°oo°°o°0000 o°°oo°oo°°o°o°oo°o°°oo°o°co°o°o°o°o°oo°mo.w•,°oo°o°o°°°o4�CI ' 1111{tl�-���''�y,' �o o.000.ria�ioov4o'vddo k��'y qq )�F51 h4,�e.eoo6o a« o«�oo°;c 00000000eo<v000ui.c; Oda 61I I1� f" �Oaml°o°o",dc°.,m _ 1158$!! wN" w°m$mo°�c0�o3.8w°<°oov�c'£'52 I1 O H 4�7Y " OmO V•<PN O'�Q<N<N WNWV�<NNmW NNm0 U ° i Iy Il�hh�� N .- W a <N ~ ���I 9�f 11 1I I�(,r. vo, Q "JIIf��IGU��IIJU���iIN.��II�......N. ....NNNCCN .. .... CO •NCO.A (((00). . 0...V)('a. �1' II,l m N oe N�N°W oom ,W OW Ob� °mo awoo0 !!3,4w O j��.l�iy';11J� 11„.,ate < (V� < °ANWO <o NNVMVN.- o FE O Ocwiac o� S • � Y ���IX �1� m N I \ fa�1,1VIIXI�I�IIyIyII �'''::�,hgYI '(IWN.I M a)M )Mmmm4)M NN MM MN N N CO ... 0-000 I+l lA �:.I 'I��I�111SIhf V m o o m ai°o 2.°-s a°i o <888888888 o n°o ;<°W.m o !,..›:011 d T g 46C '0IyII < < cw•)_ww ...<NMm w •.vr$N- I d V p� �(, 1�V�W N <N < mM �Nm mN<NN.'' yKm m ' m r�.l R �. A1C,Prvl� q t 4 ill llilJl`,Ili�li t",ti _ ItIiIII�uNI,,d+$1,„,�SW CO CO N .. NN N .,). ....). .. CO N NMHNN CO ¢ 1;1yy11,,I�yk'. . re oe eNm,-, n°0,o°°0°08°0 88°0 $a%w.°°a°g°o°o°o vi AE O 6 4.11 FJ J +.0 . H< I�NmO < NAlF0m6c0 M ^.00 0- 4,-. J1 1 a 1 oop M.N n <N ° 1p q III�J t� ' IIIIWIItlpIi]II' CO V) ((CO NN .......m. CO NNV) NN Nm... 01' 11'fil.1�(�j4,00 O 0. ° 0000 000000 O - 000 H�"44 .W. ,�yt9�1I''�Ifllfl� o o RR 00 0'800 °v°mm$°.00 °oo .o °o.°°- 0000°o, m °' Ep���l �° 8F 1 arl IVY,°- w <.- m ao m o em's °t•: N 0 w W m b n m aG 0(0(0 W1 0 V I I�„IIp.fll y Ci r N {N m 1k�'�'ry °- :;a ul I,1111 < Pli 14e�� 1i 111111 N N MN N N N a I),N' I'I• I I,N NNNNN N NN N NN N N„ (• •l' 00, 0 N 000000 828 m2FT,RI000 o 14J1�WI ▪ a �'ti I' y� J <M < ” < N <W8N°<° via`..• w''-g ° <mnvv Ifl'�Y MOO.I 11' N o <N N NN N NN NN mNm NN NN NNN NN mNNNN ,] yy 0p0.. 1144�IflJrl^1,V�I;'O O o0 00 ° 00 000000 O o00 0- o00o 14' + l'''lyI� IIIIg g oM 8 00 ”2222222 m `°oo °4- 2sloo .1 • O �' 4h1111y1110 < •c.= .o( < oC) 0W�.cm .. C. awa.N NN c-.)C W< (0 1.��l�h+'yy u� o vI W• r ICI�GI``1p 11�+� CO k.W4P l 'V III CO CO m CO CO CO,* NN NN NN N NNN NN NNN4P N�,�i W ✓✓ YI 11' Ob o Oo 000000 000 110- 0000 , '11'1 of p oa Wn 0 0. ..0000 000 No- woo. ' 1' C) b 4 WAY ''' W Na- < abggPm Nm fDCO CN :2 OJ000 yV w a J <. ,. _ ry WWI'III .n m M .CCCNON MOM K NMN mM a.nMM J' , ',Frilg ,INI: :!�� . 040L L oW F °W°m .F. N N �r°.N-N �'� g® vu 1 !R W W W W N t E� - 1CIy 1�` I i�i! Z C�U Q QQC ��I�':j uj i�?�•.,'u,lfa`t,l plti .�.i (Y.j�.�.4 W h 5 W_. PL I-N h l.]h� 6 .}ll.LL..W L a 1'5%W t.l 6 'Q O 1:1: vpwll NI Z ¢ ¢ lipl O 7.1 W w Id{�. . EL O 'i 1A dØ O m Z Q Y ��,*ay U O ^ ZO - ]N- N V=- 5,❑ w U Z.r o}' w w z 3,2'6'.:i 0- 4,,,1 m-z '❑ _ Ii1 I�ty11� �.gn C z > 2 , LI,A❑c,.. ¢5 PZI-C32 ia� o $f(a, r ` .i 0 OU . EIf1 "i'; dot° Y z azr aoOO.o 0°w 011W'.3 CU w"II f1 I'��, I'z yt ¢ MP ¢u.w.°�K Ill 1 �P'+lE, l> �o >> mm 3 "'ry c�w"-"UwOw A 1%t- I r0 ,s xs Sm w -o LWEury r o z wr r5.-m o Q 11�, 11't'-- op ❑ nw J-N U.w �g > U0¢ j m p0OU 0 am oJa acid(_OOwU w •�z zzLL❑O w,' i IL O i1..y� a... 0 .0.1i,aa. CO am szzzrzzwz > as iu 56g#7 :7-11 � w z �1 ...amm U w ON {w 000 O.�O � Z ti✓ � q�.'i0 mw¢n.a a >2m¢� z �4=-UUFOOU '� ��- .CU UU�zg4 w�I Hi III �� 1 � > O w ww 0 t uNinp t` 111111 w ¢mc� -o ?-¢''2. 12W2 0 4a U-U +,^,_ ° Iilll��fu411¢ moo 0 3pUZCio U.¢- mciw.ci rOi)om OmJmm�❑y II�I D �° Q. VII�,{Im 'x moo 0 ¢I.,0 ¢Z m._. � a _+ E ,� =O ¢v4 ° a. 001111; w oN l'0 oowwowwww n' oo� > »5 5 E4 ,,°¢ + IN mmw¢¢ ¢ m....Si= x-) .....O❑U ¢ .-Oa r=n.O❑a?a QI !I °V 1, Nm,1Wm1�WWO<NmVWmi`WW O<NmVmm))W)0<Nm''Wm ,{ q 0 O '=0 k m ylill�r NmTW WAmm NNN NNN NN NN W.mm Nmc9NW mWV V Vat V' +�^� 't "� o°o°e:Iii °o°o°o°o°0 1 III l^(II�ui1,IgI Q h 1 it J11 Ij$°$°oo°000°o 0000+YAK. FY ,�ppo oomo. ,,...=.-oo _I k,1 �IIlyify��I,ylIII14 h r.-7.-oco0e„:2 I I If I Pyv c`ei R'i v�8 oeo w�1II �. 1��1�r�tiJllllir' " y,6wy°,..,.:r,.,:712 e„ S API '1 � N f. I ° II�II�IIIII111tII0 N '' aw w ° s- S 1k r+u_ 11 f4 ~ 10111�l�f r 011II Ik�Vtll. N N NwwN Nww NN N ',VI1� I III ' yr,4' :.:-$mo°e, oo 000ryc°�roc om 11111111 VI!II!�iF.` .3..5..°hm°o°OO°o°o°oo°m°o°o k Y 4°1j4V jjNO2G,” OUP 6� 49�II� Y �'1�II�� IIt0 �1NGC Ot.2,211'44 1 r9 1 a1 4>I NN ir111Yi 11 Vi1'111 °o N �f �I �It ui,1 rV'y� ww ww ww 1 ' X11 ww hfl 6i 1 wNww�k 1111 hill 1I11I wN wwwwww 4jl — �I1l °o°o °o�°o°o°o .c4F c '1 $II 11, :) 0 0 0 a,O°000,o°°o �I' i oocc�o oo.=.- oov viral�sia,p it o n o oll F�IpH 'E wQN� 2mco� mall�Il'I 6 �;If''jl Ili��l'I� o sLian`o §taAREO �Illll' ' eN �II`,1 _ �I,�• wNwnw p�I 111 _ � I�I r'•,t�9.wyN �N :�.1i N of N 1 yn 1 's 1'w w Nwm Nw Nww SIIe,YII �Iy1196rh� 11 1 10111 R � 1 t r:1y vI rnQNow°o,°o,°o,o°OON2.,,IIrII1 It '��° m 'P�Ii III,IfI$IVimrriwo�o°^s°00000 II'�1 0 a l ...I ,OFG..„- lD 1 IC N 1111 I IS ::::::: :: ,ufl 0t 0o'°y.000022,222VO 1 f ' �FOOONOPO^^ n��u'Jjl °maP.-r.-S° ^m �«y �Ilsp, o oo<�E•-•-ZS4 FF§ .11 a''1141%'rr _i$:=1,1":11:2'r m'�_.-Fn'w 7a a:= < wi N'`•�' `co t: p ! — I1,4101A1,, Y w .N r N tNiN III o° . 1 v I` F �I �y 4, ¢ rau I� ' ww ww w.www w .1�Vfr"'l a Id�liyl 111.twV.! u1 iJ;��1 iy�illiiiiiiii R'�Ns���., ,'v.��N'� - --• •- ICJ�I I7 E 1 11 1 1 4 �- N of n N °N° w p _ v 6R � o ai o , , e w ca v o ■ lir i(11 � r n >l _ 1' f{ i11 a; oNN°°NNNNNNN NNN j1 A`H ¢5; m om •- Aa N U 1 A ll y°w ��mr111v4 °N N 'IW '111� I � l Ij a 1,, a r^00 i I,' N NNNN I I VI"44�IIa r1 ............. Ili ,M1,4.kl _ __ _ Iirsulr4 I ,PIm�""° °eoS00000 &, :_o°o o I4 If ip��ll 1 I�: m w m l --"r`Li.h N o o g 4,I m N� ��1 a j 11 o 10 a4 p� ,,...w " Nw a° �n l 6Wy 1 o rIV 1V't .Ilv 1 a IV1i„,, ,, , 11 )P 1. N NNNN 1 I Ily°IIS ta,/y 1{ 0u -_ �3sifS i1I°1IIf1Ili ''10,605°ON0ooBoo7.:m° 1 - ��i 1h 1111 Ih f ooia.,z,zi�Flo, 49�S11 �I I,ys� �h���, l� � � N f ltr,„4.11 Irv��' 7 1111 1Vu' ∎UfrS, wwww wwww....,0,A1 IL;1141h11 r� -_- -__ ','�o. !:TIIIIgg !!IIIIIIII 000 ooe oo1��: m� o° c,�1 k S~ " m m qI( F k W I � ,l il� c �,I� .'�P'4' 1 �j�4y1'gl�lu'� ��I n��' m r6 ., 4 NNN wN wNN NNN NNN;�'1 1.� 4� N I�� 'iliY�4..n�t PA II U,1114Y11r,505m..°�°o°oos6 �7II"Y j 9! VpfI. �Ii I�''� �.?.RRo.,,,,�irm111r' . . { �' II�'SI o�° 111.11 1 a;!i'I NNNNN NN N�NNNNN, �a I ° @I , 1q1.1,':�� 011 r,ALA., �I+y e. mp N•-a-�-tn1NWCifCNy,III��I }p-E 1 11'IIUHif T s^nP.- --NW0WN 1111 V� 4 N N � u114 « .- � °IIII �I O� 1� `a.- �- d, 1 Yh 1lh('IIIIIL �I IIII Itl, III•. . •fi °r��ll'PV v nYm?o ¢a¢u¢ �1�v�� 'I I�ldrlh� RwN nY�i a<aawu�w� u5��,I�1,11 fl-. �f- 000 ti ,i 1110 °0°2°,2 888822°02,2�m2 2,°o,°eo,o°0,2°00°020°2°o,o°ocmicm„oo°�2°0, IJ FN) W }�}}m w .� Nb�Om O^b2 vONmRo� 2.�OFNE O °N0ow00V,mDm f �d r 8 10)0)oa 2 -4, N r _ _ �COI1' II N F, c 7 1�I,.I�kI:Il' 0'rl e �11�6 Imm2 mmwenm .nw«.m.n.n w.n:�.nom.r..n.n.na.usvruaen.n..a....n..,en�,.n roi,^IN1I�����j���II� try Y Ii l vm 00)222$oo°°°ONro°o°,Imo°o°2222oo°o!2:22221 `; l. � 22.c, oN2m22rr0� N2°m2 mm222A$ r ruw u n It 0)m0)W.0)NN W i t* N 0)N M N m m m m W N m 0)0) mm20)22 Ih kl! .FR,ii:G 1,0 Oo00002222g800'-'02888820000008222880010 I �f'{f"}Y'1 ll, 000200000200000e0000m000 Odd{ICIIv r}°ia�z I�I 020 24�2rtioo ", ��ic nimovoo22 0000 nNVOio 1 I���41 v 0).Q mmmmNOmom®eOm°mv2on mm ea 6�4��I �tllll(:h m c l'lfill V _ t2"5" N �N.1,2p N .-m e-,- -2 s-„,.'�- s52 J�tw ,,ilfhS'ly N >. i[t ec1,y1tIR I(�I�Ii . x 1? if �a �?I 0 .1 Ili 000)0NNm...,.. N ......... )*0WW0)0)WW{R0N(000WWN(040 002000,0000 000000 00000008 m 000000 y11 f1�yy�' 0 'I 2-'228m.°oo.o000 (0000O000o88 .a,noo IIIIp� F �1"',, (0 .�-+ r2--RII W��=--- n.-4 -00c1i0o000'��K1-�Om'��+m+++ III 11Ik � IJ r�� NNm NmNCVmr°.(�bm 0)'m �uU� diM1�I�' 7 11�F( 200 mmm20)mm000m.?0Nmym4W0tlim(gm00W N. 0... tl� lI tI V� 1'd p �%4 (I �l dYl 0 0 0 o b 0)o 0 0 00 0 00 00 O N 0 0 2 0 0 0 u2y 0 0 00 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 00 0 '4 fl m u: tom m,d.oc�ciair000irgggs vr;Omoc0000aiovg(80do 111 n �,,,,.0 .00F NEE we�t°a2„ro2Ye 22n 0 C 0H°f'o°m (0400°'Oia$ml J �h4LNr���N,�l d; <5 U '�i' �(ON ON Nm r ,'22' .=N �C�[Np 22tO CV.P V.� I'U VV p,' h r ¢ Nm(0(0W(N.000000)00004(00W000)000.A000WNm(W0)mmmm(pmm00 13^I^� M1 AlOmNbwON 000)0000 OW OOP00000(1) 0)N 00 �� AIi'P MI° iy1mwmm. "iSm2m m$ a a2202�m2N T N 22�>r�n2r�rW 22222 ,08 rr222 F11 = i�, rr � N Qa��r888°°Q.° ���� l� l lllhy �iVV�,11i r r 41 l E, 16Y m(nmm2m 2 2m2N.nm m22mmm2mm2m m2mmm2 �,IIh4, y',,��;f L'IIpIi ¢'Nm OO°22; °2°o°Oeow<wvmc°v°o22O°oo°0°00°222°22°828°0°oomn°o0)°°o°o1411I ,. n }}}0�2 Vw 2cmi MrN rr hb(4 c°�0 Nn00Y 0NM 1�ry G � ! '� M r N .-r 2 n N 2 � 4 1,h{I 1�Iyi � N E;'” M a M Ifs 0. a li r;Kam' I � 1 Nfi of 'I'I mmmm(m)m0m(m0)0)0)mmmm2m0)0)00)(nm 0)000)00)000 "A(00)40(/)• ,Hd1 p1 JjJjN8 b888NWmM?n800r0808 88 08 00 0 0 0j0 °O°o y,Z'j l'4IIIII'�.1 �J -°° �w,000rt�'''.2 :'�`rc".,.00°o°oc°ii'O'„°.cmim°o " c�i°U I11' u a � N r r m m m cn N m c n cv 2 ( IY�'I�II� Illj 7 C`�ll''�XI t VIII V^f mmm0)m2....VYmmmm2mmmmm....N0)mmm ....... X8828 080222222220 8N00028888822o2 2 qY IP,1 0 mwu+\ 4,1p C }}}0)z N ` , `' Om y '9 I1�e 2800 rnm 22',oz.,'.c°iv ego rho 200 000020)8r 8 'oim '� ti n U 4�, › 2 gi r rr .'g.. ,r GC T, 2.° 'I 'La o,, m%�1I m y lh S Ui,y^ to ��lmmm mmm mmukm mm 0022002 mmmmmmmmmmm 200002200 2222 , o �I II .iiviviai8828°o°o°w82 288808°28880°°20°288888288fm°we°8°o, C4 I( fl,��ll 1I 411j1, �1,v22 r 200or`r-( ro 0Oo�i2mo�622 r C 2dl f ,$ �uV � �N m e<n N� f�y4��j�a�,�l 2 41II�II1 2�m2 2ti r�2gmN; met Q�2 �b� �� 0 IY III �a m m2mmm2m..immmm2m2mm,2m2mmmmmmm2 mmmmmm Y Y iu�,I�e� 1 � gI,��88°oeoeeo8°2208°082°282 080°0°2°2°2°2°28oe2°2oo°2°2828oeo°2 oo°°011( ' '�io G 'I'1, o 2oocfi2m2,<io- oo+.io2.i000200002�i2=io2 I iM11 0 Ii hwHlem+°oeoe2o°i2tr'N"eoem o,2-M Cin °ww"E`$.�'-°2°m°OOCemtDe28Q°oemmwRU1R �I m h`[,, ar 2MO .=r rr wom°am r I� .IVY o E 1 �'� Il;e'FI 0, "rt,,.l��tuli�lld'I m gjtv, �1�d IIIIJJ�IFIi 49 • mmmmmmm0)m400)0)0mm20)0)mm m0)mm20)mmmm2mmm mmmmmm If 11 m v�00.°0 000c0>'r°800888288088808000eeo°g'eg'81 11,}��(klll A 1111- -.-gym v.r 22. ."- ,2,7,.. io°eic22222o-ci F.:f,01aa.l ' , IpI $ . is'uJ 111�I11.1 mmmmmm2m2mmHmmmmmm0)0)mm0)mm2040 m0)2m04R�a.,;. r l r`, on 002 � z llIy 11I�' O� '�r °2cg°mmrPn°� NmF.- -rm�,2m.-NQNOmv.-v.-.-��,$.N ��i J Z 000 d h�Qll it !!(1J fD Div}ti t�}}d_j.J->}a Y}{{41iQ¢¢QQ}d d�N �W��I'' ;"u � 4f,flJ2<>7, �fO rnwJmMVJtlJ" 21.tilt 6,1-.WWWm w 2 u : I1SI,�'Illr E ,,Ii; 11. ', 1 b V m`0 _ 7,1 d 0 Q Ih �'�,'II'd'r =o S w a 5 J LL �I m wo 0= ¢ ��4 I K w U O }- w m O w z 'r1 ' o Iryiy b m f'0) Z b0) E z I'� ( m ° 4^�rIIpI g7- w .. m §2R o w w w Y 1V' V Y �M1` r, I U� H12-IY- §1-U a'2U K (~p?ZZ�i l w 1 '1 �;^�� m (lly ug.7 O rao.a zz }uiz O }, gx2 1V".191U�: 3° `m ;� " w 'oo a� � . ,r-E z mz000 .1 1I li ll El i 52 .0 O w00w ¢.0m-z rzN2_0n w>0a�40wqz0 70�0 z WoI-A7F-17oFz-w1oNz w-lzbruN_,m 0-~°=zzw,cal o 00 b� a =d ` = FO .),, -- ,22,,50§g0=S Na20-w Wwicow, d %o %§nrE ¢ O °2 S-w w wy¢ma w K�O¢gf%r a a .RE _o ig"-Wifiw Fz>pn ° QV-l-x X d'- i}}}} I I w V 2 �' oOgo>¢77 "aIb.gf- o . za5812 0.-. al q Gs - r. Mmrb aUUdoa pa.ma viz1-zH%ooxKO ---- Yag ° w � m omomOO 28n.Cail\`w1- 200W0000R-.7Nm o w W6006o 11r 0 z = n3 5".59 V-- o-oo 6 zwW 00`x$ 0 L m ° _.04wwww7000>0UUUV.q§-Ezzzw P8dialrr-P . O OA =WI ,e2222`2 Z ¢¢Z~mOWWmW'77<U 7}U a ¢ 'i )i Ua e. a=B5 0020 KwMe_22=o0 OVlaVVU1UU00¢ 7,ZmOO 3Oa : oY 4'min2m 2 41 t 1W , O 0 !W 1 -N2YWOt-2220 0NN n(0( NN(40m2X2...., 4 i -+.yi- , re_ piacc4 OH 0 N cu © 0 a cu ?- o a) U C (1)c rd O -E U cu .— u a N .' E O 'n CU s Q - — O coc " 73 E av, c CO o CV riCS U l ' LA it >4 � p rd E ..,0--- , , ,,,, , „, -:,.—, v, c, ii5. u rci rd L— c . p Cj o cu -SD a U kan z3 cn rd p c v U Q C v U U ii . rd -� —' 75 O 0 cr$ < .14( a)" 139 U Lt ac •Nd icc au rd .-u T a) II= rd i1�..1 CD LL U (i) (...7 cv _c c O 1- - rL...) V ! 0 0 0 I ReT1a IJ-ewt 6 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: July 31, 2012 Department Director Approval Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information LI admin. report ❑ pending legislation ® executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: EXECUTIVE SESSION: Pending/Potential Litigation and Labor Negotiations GOVERNING LEGISLATION: [(RCW 42.30.110(1)(i)] and [RCW 42.30.140(4)] PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: "I Move that Council adjourn into executive session I for approximately forty-five minutes to discuss pending/potential litigation and labor negotiations, and that no action will be taken upon return to open session." BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: ATTACHMENTS: RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 'r �. - STANDARDS GUIDE vaey_ . Community Development— Punning Division 5_ 11703 E Sprague Ave Suite B-3 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 ll 509.688.0197 0 Fax: 509.921.0037♦ planning®spokanevaUey.org Residential Zone Dimensional Standards in feet) I R-1 R..2 R-3 R4 MF-1 MF-2 PRD Single Family Lot 40,000 10,000 7,500 6,000 3,600 2,000 Underlying Area/Dwelling Unit zone Duplex Lot Area Per 6,000 5,000 Dwelling Unit E Lot Width 80 80 65(4) 50 45 20 30 m E Lot Depth 100 90 90 80 80 80 50 Front& Flanking Street 35 15 15 15 15 15 15 Yard Setback(2)(3) Garage Setback(2(3)) 35 20 20 20 20 20 20 Rear Yard Setback(1)(3) 20 20 20 20 10 10 15 Side Yard Setback(1)(3) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Open Space I 1 10% gross area E Lot Coverage 30.0% 50.0% 50.0% 55.0% 60.0% 65.0% 60.0% E 74 Building Height 35 35 35 40 50 Underlying r4 (in feet) Zone 1 No accessory structure shall be located in the front or flanking street yard, and shall be setback not less than five(5)feet from any side or rear yard. 2 Attached garages,where the garage door does not face the street, may have the same setback as the principal structure. Setbacks, when adjacent to a private road or driveway easement,are established from the inner edge of a the road or driveway and are the same as noted above except the flanking road which would be five (5) feet. 4 Duplex lots in R-3 zones may be a minimum of 60 feet in width. Total square footage of all detached accessory structures, regardless of lot size, is a maximum 10% of lot size RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS GUIDE Page 1 of 1 REVISED 2/09