2012, 11-13 Regular Meeting AGENDA
SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
FORMAL FORMAT MEETING
Tuesday,November 13,2012 6:00 p.m.
Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers
11707 E Sprague Avenue
Council Requests Please Silence Your Cell Phones During Council Meeting
CALL TO ORDER:
INVOCATION: Pastor Steve Williams,New Life Assembly of God Church
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
ROLL CALL:
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS:
COMMITTEE,BOARD,LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS:
MAYOR'S REPORT: Proclamation:National Hunger and Homelessness Awareness Week
PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those on
this agenda as action items. (Action items include public hearings, and those items under NEW
BUSINESS. Public Comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.) When
you come to the podium, please state your name and address for the record and limit remarks to three
minutes.
1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any
member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered
separately.
a. Approval of the following claim vouchers:
VOUCHER LIST DATE VOUCHER NUMBERS; TOTAL AMOUNT
10/16/2012 27291-27319 $343,997.03
10/19/2012 4111-4ll4; 27320 $63,17022
10/19/2012 5521-5530 $1,536.00
10/19/2012 27321-37371; 1017120027 $910,121.55
10/26/2012 27372-27422; 10131397 $166,275.60
10/29/2012 27423-27443 $37,91610
ll/02/2012 27445-27493; 1030120025, 1031120002 $4,611,480.05
ll/02/2012 4127-4130; 4141; 27494-27498 $242,96829
GRAND TOTAL $6,377,464.84
b. Approval of Payroll for period ending October 31, 2012: $397,131.39
c. Approval of Minutes of October 23, 2012 Council Formal Format Meeting
d. Approval of Minutes of October 30, 2012 Council Study Session Meeting
e. Approval of Extension for Economic Development Ad Hoc Committee Report Deadline
Council Agenda 11-13-12 Formal Format Meeting Page 1 of 2
NEW BUSINESS:
2. First Reading Proposed Ordinance 12-028 Multi-Family Regulations—Mike Basinger
[public comment]
3. First Reading Proposed Ordinance 12-029 Commercial Vehicles (Trucks)—Cary Driskell
[public comment]
4.Proposed Resolution 12-007 Accepting Environment Designations, Shoreline Master Plan—
Lori Barlow [public comment]
5. Proposed Resolution 12-008 Business Route Signage—Inga Note, Eric Guth
[public comment]
6. Motion Consideration: Approval of Comprehensive Plan Docket—John Hohman
[public comment]
7. Motion Consideration: Approval of University Road Overpass Study—Inga Note
[public comment]
8. Motion Consideration: Sullivan Rd W Bridge Project, Request to use De minimus Exemption—
Steve Worley [public comment]
PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those on
this agenda as action items. (Action items include public hearings, and those items under NEW
BUSINESS. Public Comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.) When
you come to the podium, please state your name and address for the record and limit remarks to three
minutes.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS:
9. Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Recommendation to Council—Mark Calhoun
10. Drainage Easements: a. Beach House Apts;b. Cancer Center—Gabe GalLinger
ll. Advance Agenda—Mayor Towey
INFORMATION ONLY(will not be reported or discussed):
12. Street Maintenance Contract Renewal
13. Street Sweeping Contract Renewal
14. Mailing Inserts
15. Community Minded Television Report
16. Greater Spokane, Inc 3rd Quarter Report
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT
General MeetinQ Schedule (meeting schedule is always subject to change)
Regular Council meetings are generally held every Tuesday beginning at 6:00 p.m.
The Formal meetin� formats are �enerally held the 2°d and 4`h Tuesda� Formal meeting have time
allocated for general public comments as well as comments after each action item.
The Study Session formats (the less formal meetin�) are �enerally held the ls` 3ra and 5`''Tuesda�
Study Session formats DO NOT have time allocated for general public comments; but if action items are
included, comments are permitted after those speci�c action items.
NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate
physical, hearing, or other impairments, please contact the City Clerk at (509) 921-1000 as soon as
possible so that arrangements may be made.
Council Agenda 11-13-12 Formal Format Meeting Page 2 of 2
C[TY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request tor Council Action !
;
Meeting Date: November 13, 2012 DeparEment Director ApprovaL �
Check a!i #ha#apply: � consent ❑ old bUSiness ❑ new bUSiness ❑ public hearing
AGE{VDA ITEM TITLE. Appro�al of the �o[lawing Vouchers;
VOUC .H. ER LIST DATE VOUCHER NIIMB�RS; TOTAL,AMOLTNT
10/16/2012 27291-27319 $343,997.03
10/19/2012 4111-4114; 27320 $63,170,22
10/19/2012 5521-5530 $1,536.00
10/19/2012 27321-37371; 1017120027 $910,121.SS
10/26/2012 27372-27422; 10131397 $1b6,275.60
10/29/2012 27423-27443 $37,916.10
11/02/2012 27445-27493; 1030120025, 1031120002 $4,611,480.05
11/02/2012 4127-4130; 4141; 27494-27498 $242,968,29
GRAND TOTAL �5,377,464,84
Explanation of�'und Numbers faund on Voucher Lists
#Oal -Ge►�eral Tund Ot�ier F��nds
0O1,011,000.511 City Council 101 —Street Fiand
001.013,000.513. City Man�get• 103 —Pati�s &Trails
001.013.015.515. Legal 105—HoteUMotel Tax
001.016.000. Public S�fety 120—CenterPIace Operating Rese�ve
001.018.013,513. Deputy City Manage�� 12I --Setvice Level Stabilization Reserve
001.018.014.5 I4. Finance 122—Winter Weather Reseive
001,018.01G.516. Hu�natt Resot�cces 123—Civic�'acilities Replaceme�rt
001,032.000. Public Works 204—Debt Service
001.058.050.558. Comzn. Develop.-Administration 301 —Capital Projects (15{'/a%REET}
001.058.055.559. Coanm,Develop.—Develop.Eng. 302�-Special Capital Proj (2nd'/%REET}
001.058.OS6.558. Community Develop.-Planning 303 —Street Capital Pi•ojects
001.05$.057.559, Commun�ty Develop.-Building 304—Mirabeai�Point Project
001.076.000.576, Parks &Rec—Administi'ation 307—Capital G�•a�fts
001.076.300.576. Parks&Rec-Mainte�iance 309—Parks Capital Gra�its
001.076.301.574. Pa��ks&Rec-Rec�•eatio�i 310—Civic Bldg Capital Projects
001.07G.302.576. Pa��ks&Rec-Aqitatics 311 —Stteet Capital Improvements 201 l+
001.076304,575. Pa�'ks &Rec- Sexiio�•Centej� 402--Storinwater Management
001.076.305.574. Parks &Rec-CenterPlace 403 —Aquifer Protec#ioti Az•e�
001.090.00O,S I 1. Gelieral Gov't- Coutfcil related 501 --Equipment Rental &Replacemej�t
001,090.000.514. General Gov't-�'inance related 502—Risk Maif�gejnent
OOI,090.000.517. General Gov't-Employee sE�pply
OOI.090.000.518. Gene��al,Gov't-Cent�'alized Se�vices
001.090.00O,S19. Ge�fe�•al Gov't-O�ier Seivices
001.090,000.531, General Gov't�Nah��'al Resouz•ces
001.090,000.550. Gejferal Gov't-Economic Dev.
001.090.000.560. Gejiej•al Gov't-Social Seivices
001,090.000.594. Ge�ieral Godt-Ca�ital Outlay
R�COMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Approve claims for vouchers as listed above.
STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun, Finance Director
ATTACHME{VTS; Vouche� Lists
vchlist Vo�cher List Page: 'I
1019fi12012 2:90:9SPM Spokane Va[ley
Bank code= apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invo"rce FundlDept Descrip#ionlAccoun# Amount
27291 10/16/2012 QQ3199 ADA1R HOMES INC Refund QQ1.032.QQQ.322 REFUI�D: PERMIT FEE REFUND 52.00
Total : 52.00
27292 10/76/2012 001081 ALSCO LSP01206681 001.016.000.521 FLOOR MA7S: PRECIf�iCT 2Q.70
LSP01213221 001.016A44.521 FLOOR MATS= PRECINCT 24.39
LSP01217018 001.016.000.521 FLOOR MATS: PR�CIf�iC7 20.39
Total : 61.48
27293 101'16120'I2 000030 AVISTA September 2012 101.042.000.542 UTIL1TlES: PW MASTER AV[STA 23,262.65
September 2012 QQ1.076.3QQ.576 UTIL1TlES: PARKS MASTER AVISTA 11,511.89
Total : 34,774.54
27294 10/16/2012 000271 BAII�BRIDG�, CHRISTINE Expenses 007.043.000.5'[3 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMEN7 18.54
Total : 18.54
27295 10/16/2012 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINENI SUPPLY INC 9369524 001.076.305.575 LIf�fENI SERVCEAND SUPPLYAT CE 948.03
50040279 001_076.305.575 Lli�[Ei�[SERVCEAND SUPPLYAT CE 8.75
Total : 156.78
27296 10/16/2012 001169 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLE`( September 2012 001.076.301.574 PE1TY CASH PARKS:8967,8968 37.05
Total : 37.05
27297 10/16/2012 001169 C1TY OF SPOKANE VALLEY October 2012 001 A58.056.558 PETCY CASH:8'[65,66,68,69,70,71,' 17.38
Total : 17.38
27298 101'I6120'12 00'I'I21 DEW DROP SPRINKLERS,�LA�iDSCAPI Centerpiac.�1 309A00.172.594 CONTRACT#C012-1Q8 CP LA�iDS( 31,130.74
Terrar.e Vew Park 1 '309.3Q9.165.594 TERRACE VIEW PLAYGROUND 1Mf 91,673_45
Total : 122,804.19
27299 10/16/2012 001701 DUFFEY,DAN Expenses 004.078.044.574 EXPEI�SE REIMBURSENfENT 941.49
Total: 941.49
27300 10/16/2012 442877 FISCHER,WALLY Expersses 001.076.30'I.574 EXPEI�SE REIMBURSEMENT 48_00
7otaI : 48_00
27301 10/16/2012 QQ0441 HOME DEPOT CREDff SERVICES September 2012 001.076.300.576 SUPPLIES: CENTERPLACE 564.69
Page: 1
vchlist VouCheC List Page: 2
101�612012 2:90:96PM Spokane Va[ley
Bank code : apbank
Voticher Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept DescriptionlAccount Amount
27301 10/16/2012 004441 000441 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 7o�a1 = 564.69
27302 10/16/2012 002607 HUB SPORTS CENTER Oct 2012 105.105.000,557 LODGING 7AX 2012 GRANT REIMB 2,000.48
7ota1 : 2,000.48
27303 10/16/2012 00007D [NLAND POWER&�IGHT CO 94202 101.042.000.542 U7IL171ES:SEP7EMBER PW 391.45
Total : 391.45
27304 10/16/2012 000388 IRV1N WATER DIST.#6 September 2092 101.042.000.542 UTtL1T1ES: PW 108.01
7otal : 108.O�I
27305 10/16/20'I2 001635 ISS FAC[LITYIEVENT SERViCES 404924 001.076.305.575 �VENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLAI 171.40
Total : 171.40
27306 10/96/2042 009684 MARKETING SOLUTIONS NW CP 14-�3-2012-Media 001.076.3D5.575 ADVERT[SING FOR CENTERPLACE 1,762.00
Total : 'I,762.00
27307 'I011612012 000132 MODER�I E�EC7RNC WA7ER CO September 2012 909.042.000.542 U71LI71ES:PW 8,713.96
7o�al : 8,713.96
27308 10/16/2012 003198 �IORTHWEST PAVEMENT MANAGEMENI October 2072 001.032.000.543 NWPMA CONFERENCE REGISTRP: 300.00
Sotal : 300.00
27309 10/16/2012 000709 SENSKE LAWN 8�TREE CARE INC. 4437585 001.076.3DD.576 CO�ITRP.CT MA]NT:SEPT 2092 54,123.81
5160457 001.076.300.576 IRRIGATIONI [NIS7ALLAT DfSC PLA� 7,935.10
5195531 001.076.3DD.576 MISC PARK REPAIRS: NOT ON COP 583.95
5231940 001.016.00D.521 CONTRACT MA1NT:SEPT 2012 PRE 1,758.65
5238382 001.076.300.576 MISC PARK REPAIRS: NOT ON COP 1,190.58
7otaN : 65,592.09
27310 101'I612012 000323 SPOKA�IE CO UTILITIES October 2012 001.D76.302.576 SEWER CHARGES FOR OCTOB�R 1,651.38
7otal : 1,65�I.38
27311 10/16/2092 000451 SPOKAI�E REG SPORTS COMMiSSION September 2012 105.105.000.557 3RD QTR 2092 LODGII�G 7AX R�[N 46,250.DD
Total : 46,250.QQ
27312 10/'I6/2092 000202 SRCAA 2284 001.090.000.531 47H Q7R 20'I2 28,892.25
Page: 2
vch[ist Voucher List Page: 3
10116l2012 2:10:16PM Spokane Valley
Bank code: 8pb8nk
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept DescriptionlAccour� Amoeant
27312 10M8/2012 OOQ202 000202 SRCAA (Continued) Totat : 28,892_25
27393 10/16/2012 QQiQ83 STANDARD PLBG HEATING CONTROLS 50058 QQ1.01$.000.521 S�P7EMB�R 2012 MOiVTHLY MAIN' 553.80
TotaI : 553.6D
273'14 10/16/2012 OQ1472 TESTAMERtCA LAB 59QQ5651 001.07$.300.578 EiVVIRONMENTAL T�STING: PAF2K: 27_00
7otaf : 27.00
27395 '10/16/2012 0019'I1 THE GLOVER MANSIOPI CP555 001.076.305.575 EVEN7 SERVICES AT CENT�RPLA4 537.90
Total : 537.'I D
27396 90/16/2012 001444 UiV1TED LABORATORIES INV025272 001.076.305.575 SUPPLI�S FOR CENTERPLACE 31$.39
7o#al : 318.31
27397 '10/1612012 000295 VALLEYFEST October 2a12 00'I.090.000.550 OUTSIDE AGENCY GRANT: ECO DI 6,917.33
October 2Q12 001.090.000,550 OUTSIDE AGEiVCY GRAN7: ECO DI 881.25
October 2012 105.905A00.557 2012 LODGING TAX GRAIVT R�fM6 '13,850.00
Total : 21,648.58
273'I8 9 a/16/2012 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT QF SPOKAPIE 0056088-1518-8 402.4a2.000.538 WASTE MGIIII�:SEPT�MB�R 2012 5,581.28
To#al : 5,581.28
273'I9 1a/16/2012 001409 WORLD CLASS COMMUiV1CATfONS 120911173101 00'I.a76.305.575 AiVSWERING SVCS: CEN7ERPLAC 22.00
Total : 22.DD
29 Vo�schers for bank code: apbank Sank fotal : 343,997.D3
29 Vouchers in fhis reporf Total vouchers: 343,997.D3
Page: 3
vchlist 1loucher List Page: 9
�011912012 10:00:27AM 5pokane 1/alley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fundl�ept �escriptionlAccount Amount
411� 10/19/2012 000048 VANTAGETRANSFERAGENTS,40'1APLAN Ben46280 00z.239.94.00 401A:Payment 22,720.05
Total; 22,720.05
4112 10/19/2012 000682 EFTPS Ben46282 001.231.Z1.00 FEDERALTAXES:Payment 32,665.93
Total: 32,665.93
4'i13 �Ol'I9/20�2 000145 VANTAGEPO[NT TRANSFER AGEN7S,457 PLf Ben46284 001.231.18.00 457 DEFERREQ COMPENSATION;Payr 6,656.91
Totat: 6,656.91
41�I4 'f0/19l20'f2 000162 VAN7AGETRANSFERAGENTS,401AEXEC PL Ben46286 001.231.14.00 401 EXEC PLAN:Payment 1,052.33
Tota[: 1,052.33
27320 10/19/2012 001896 DANIEL H BRUNNER Sen46278 001.231.20.00 BONDURANT,M]CHAEL 1203245:Paym 75.00
Total: 75.00
5 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank#ora[; 63,170.22
5 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 63,170.22
I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury,
that the materials ha�e been fumished,the services
rendered,orthe labor performed as described herein
and thaY the daim is just,due and an un�aid
obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that
I am authorized to authenticate and ceRiiy said claim.
Fina�ce Director �ate
Mayor Date
Gounpl Member Date
Page: 1
vchiist Voucher List Page: 9
1 011 912 0 1 2 �0:57:20AM Spo[cane Valley
Bank code: pk ref
Vo�cher Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept DescriptionlAccount Amount
5521 10/19/2012 001$53 ALZHEIMERSASSOC R�FUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MfRABEAU ME� 257.00
Total : 257.00
5522 10/19/2012 001549 �MDE SPORTS, LLC R�FUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:M[RABEAU ME� 257.00
Total : 257.00
5523 10/'I9120'12 003'I92 HUNTER, SHANf R�FUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSI7 REFUND:7ERRACE VEEV 52.00
Total : 52Aa
5524 10/19/2012 002$96 INLAND EMPIRE MORGAN HORSE, CLUI R�FUND 001.237.10.99 REFUND D�POSIT: MISSION HOR� 52.00
Total : 52.Oa
5525 10/19/2012 003195 KELLER WILLIAMS REALTY REFUND 001.237.'[0.99 DEPOSI7 REFUND:AUDITORIUM 52.00
Total: 52.aa
552fi 10/19/2012 003194 KRIGER,ANASTASIYA REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSI7 REFUfVD: GREA7 ROOM 210.00
TotaI : 210.00
5527 'I01'19120'I2 003'193 PETIT CHAT VILLAGE BAKERY REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:GR�ENACR�S 52.00
Tatal : �2.00
552$ 1 011 9/2 0 1 2 pp319B RIGG[N, DONNA REFUi�ID 001.237.10.99 D�POSIT REFUND:MIRABEAU ME� 52.00
Total : �2.00
5529 10/19/2012 003151 TODD,JANESSA REFUND 001.237.10.99 D�POSIT R�FUND: FIR�SID�LOUI 500.00
Total : 500.00
5530 10/19/2012 002267 WAASSOC. OF ACCOUNTANTS R�FUND 001237.1 p_99 DEPOSIT R�FUND: ROOM 110 52.00
Total : 52.00
10 Vo�chers for bank code: pk-ref Bank total : 1,536.00
10 Vouchers in this report TotaN�avchers: 1,536.00
Page: 1
vchlist Voucher List Page: 9
90/19/2092 '[:18:29PM Spokane Val[ey
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Ver�dor Ir��oice FundlDept Descrip�ioNAcco�nt Amount
2732'I 'I0/1912012 00092� A TO Z RENTALS 10561{'r1 10'1.042.000.542 WE�D F_ATER RENTAL�PARTS: P' 2,469.64
Sotal: 2,459.64
27322 '1011912012 000958 AAA SWEEPING, LLC 48548 402.402.00d.538 2012 STREET SWEEPING SERVICE 32,565.06
Sotal : 32,565.06
27323 10/19/2012 002988 ACE LANDSCIaP1NG 1769 101.042.000.542 2012 LANDSC/aPING REGHT OF WA 8,7d9.57
Sotal : 8,709.57
27324 10/19/2d12 003076 AMSQEN, ER1CA EXPENSE 001.032.000.543 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 19.98
Total : 19.98
27325 10/19/2012 000030 AVESTA 246314823 310.ddd.164.594 WEST GATEWAYI LANDSCAPE PRc 807.88
7otaN : 807.88
27326 10119/20'12 000694 AVISTA UT[LITIES 40610 001.d9d.000.519 HOME�NERGYAUD[TS-SEPTEME 187.dd
7otal : 187A0
27327 90/'I9/2092 00'I816 BENTHIN�ASSOCIATES '1945 311.ddd.162.541 d962-GRAQE STAKING ON F/IILEC 1,376.dd
1946 311.000.162.541 d762 MONIUMENT RESTORATfON s4s.aa
Total : 2,024 AO
27328 10/19/2012 Od0101 CDW-G R413794 00'I.058.050.558 COMPUTER SOFTWAREMARDWAI 398.19
R63d5d6 00'I.090.000.598 COMPUTER SOFTWAREMARQWAI 298.42
7otal : 696.53
27329 10/19/2012 000863 CENTI�RY WEST ENG CORP 233291 101_042_000_542 2012 TIP S�RVICES-EXPIRES 12/; 7,52'I.57
Totaf : 7,521.57
27330 10119120'I2 000729 CH2MHILL INC 3$49999 303.303.155.595 0'155-SULLIVAN RD W BR[DGE SL 72,64020
Totat : 72,640.20
27331 10/'19120'I2 000$40 CLARY,AARON EXPENIS� 402.402.ddd.538 EXPENSE R�[MBURSEMENT:G[S( '1,070.'1'1
TofiaI : 9,070.91
27332 'I011912012 000683 D/•1VID EVANS&ASSOCIATES 323171 �a�.oaz.aaa.saz 20'12 TRAFFIC ENG[NE�R[NG SER' 2,132.70
323526 009.058.055.559 SPOKANE VALLEY PLAT REVIEW 1,238.00
Page: 1
vchlist VOUCher L,ist Page: 2
90/19/2092 '{;18;29PM Spokane ValEey
Ba�k code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept Descrip�ionlAccount Amount
27332 10/19/2012 000�83 ddd683 DAVID EVAHS&ASSOCIATES (Continued) Total : 3,370.70
27333 '1011912012 000734 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION LA07530R 303.303.955.595 SULLIVAN RD W BRIDGE REPLACE 31.37
Total : 31.37
27334 10/19/2012 002920 DIR�CTV, WC 188364�43165 109.042.000.543 OC72092 CABLE SVCS:MAINT FAt 34.99
Total : 3a.99
27335 10119/2d12 002157 ELJAY OIL COMPANY 4202189 101.000.000.542 SEPTEMBER 2012:FUEL 809.02
Total: 801.02
27336 10/19/2012 001926 FARR,SARAH EXPENSE 001_018_014_5'{4 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENiT 49.40
To1'al : 49.40
27337 1d11912d12 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLlSHING INiC 38428 101.042.133.595 LEGAL PUBLICAT[ON 944.00
38429 303.303.146.595 LEGAL PUBLICATION '1'f 0.40
38448 303.303.061.595 LEGAL PUBLICATEON 142.20
38520 001_013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATEON 25_00
38521 001.058.056.558 LEGAL PUBLICATlON 113.05
38522 001.058.056.558 LEGAL PUBLfCATION 104.55
38523 001.058.056.558 LEGAL PUBL[CATIONi 112.20
7otal : 751_40
27338 90/19/2012 000007 GRAINGER 9943918889 101.042.000.542 SUPPLIES=PW 1828
Total : 18.28
27339 10/19/2012 003177 GUTH, EREC EXPENSE OOt.032.000.543 EXPENISE REIMBURSEMENT 28.83
EXPENSE 00'I.032.000.543 EXPENISE R�IMBURSEMEINT 198.59
Total : 227.42
27340 10/19/2012 OOOdd2 H&H BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC. SEP7EMBER 2092 001.076.000.576 COPIER COST 2,502.00
rotar: z,�oz.aa
27341 10/19/2012 d00421 HOHMAN,JOHN EXPENSE d01.058.050_558 EXPENSE RE[MBURSEMEN7 'I23.24
Totai : 123.24
27342 10/19/2012 ddd313 I�iLAND ASPHALT COMPANY 1NC. PAY APP#1 4d3.000.163.595 CONS7RUC710N-SPRAGU�SWAI 263,801.80
Page: 2
vchlist Voucher List page: 3
10/99/2012 1:98:29PM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor lnvoice F�ndll�ept I]escriptionlAccount Amount
27342 10/19/2012 000313 000313 iNl._AND ASPHALT COMPANY INC. (Continued} TotaI : 263,801.80
27343 10/19/2012 000864 JUB ENGINE�RS, INC. 0078237 101.Q42A00.542 T[P DATA MAINTENANCE AND UPD 2,638.Q3
TofiaI : 2,638.03
27344 10/19/2012 OOd482 LANDTEK, LLC 4813 303.303.160.595 �1/ERGREEN RD RECON.SURVEY 2,058.75
Tofial : 2,058.75
27345 10/19/2012 002203 NAPAAUTO PARTS SEPTEMBER 2012 �a�.000.aaa.�2 SUPPLIES: PW 165.71
Tofial : 165.71
27346 '[0/'19/20'I2 007035 NETWORK DESIGN�MAPlAGEM�NT 21827 001.090.000.518 SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE 6,3d4.60
3522 001.090.OQ0.518 SYSTEM MONTHLY MA[NTEPlANCE �4,517.50
Total : T0,822.To
27347 10/19/2012 000652 OFFIC�DEPOT INC. 62634671001 00'1.058.05Q.558 OFFICE SUPPLIES: CD 65,17
626563250001 001.076.305.575 OFFICE SUPPL[ES: P�R 25.'I�4
626887876001 001.032.000_543 OFFICE SUPPL[ES: PW 5.35
'Total: 95.66
27348 10/19/2012 002844 ON�CALL CONC�PTS, iNC 1209303 001.058.050.558 LOCATOR TICKET MGMT SYSTEM 58.30
Total : 58.30
27349 10119/20'12 002243 ORBITCOM 00607888 001.090.000.518 ETHERNET:OCTOBER 2012 590.00
Total : 590.00
27350 '!0/'i912012 002424 P[TNEY BOWES GLOBAL 1428301-OT12 001.090.000.518 METER R�NTAL 275.Q0
Total : 275.44
27351 10/19/2012 001276 RANDALL, DAVfD 1520 402.402.000.538 BEITMAN �DICKEY RD-1�4TH TO 4,&40.QQ
Total : 4,840.00
27352 10/19/2012 000709 SENSKE I._AWN&TREE CARE INC. 4524997 101.0�42.000.5�42 2012 �MERGENCY TRAFFIC CONT 542.77
TofaC : 5�42.71
27353 10/19/2012 003200 SIMS,ASHLEY REFUND 001.076.302.347 AQUATICS REFUND-RfVER SIMS 30,00
Total : 30.00
Page: 3
vchlist Voucher List Page: 4
90/19/2012 7;18;29PM Spokane Valley
Bank cade: apbank
Va�cher Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept DescriptionlAccount Amount
27354 10/19/2012 000779 50UTHARD, BRAD September 2012 101.042.000.542 2412 DEAd ANIMAL REMOVAL 1,835.00
Total : 1,835.00
27355 10/19/2012 001140 SPECIAL ASPHALT PRODUCTS INVC060327 101.042.000.542 MELTER l�ENTAL: PW 'I,576.15
Total : 1,576.15
27356 'I011912012 000172 SPOKANE CO EHGINEER VLY1249 101.042.000.542 COUN7Y SERVICES 93,329.66
7otal : 93,329.66
27357 10/19/2012 000090 SPOKANE CO[NFO SYSTEMS 50308822 001.018.013.513 COUN7Y IT SUPPORT 'I8,'155.57
TOtal : 18,155.57
27358 10/19/2012 000001 SPOKANE CO Tl�FASUftEft 51501333 001.416.000.523 SEPT 20'12 HOUSING INVO{CE 97,739.00
51501347 101.042.000.542 dETENTION SVCS 1NV0[CE:SEPT 3,272.68
7ota1 : 101,011.68
27359 14/19/2412 000001 SPOKANE CO Tl�FASURER 'I450037'I 001.090.000.566 3Rd QTl�2412: L[QUOR TAX 4,084.14
Tofial : 4,084.14
27360 10/19/2012 000862 SPOK�INE ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. PayApp 1 311.444.162.541 UNIVERSI7Y OVERLY CONSTRUCZ 197,261.03
PayApp 6 303.303.112.595 INDIAHAAVE.EXTENSIO�i CN CO� 38,527.91
Total : 235,788.94
27361 10119120'12 000093 SPOKESMAH-REVIEW 333031 00'[.493.000.513 ADVERTfSEM�NT:ACCT 42365 2,699.47
Tatal : 2,699.07
27362 10/19/2012 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 3183477681 001.0'18.013.5'13 OFFICE SUPPLlES: PI -51.65
3183477682 004.058.057.559 OFFICE SUPPLl�S: CD 34.59
3183077683 001.058.057,559 OFFICE SUPPLIES: CD 44.37
3183077684 001.058.057.559 OFFICE SUPPLIES: CD '[83.22
3183077685 001.058.057.559 OFFICE SUPPLIES: CD 89.29
7o�ai : 296.74
27363 10/19/2012 444257 STATE AUDITOft'S OFFICE L95504 001.090.000.514 SAO AUDIT OF 2411 23,836.32
TotaI : 23,836.32
27364 10N9/2012 000335 TlRE-I�AMA 8080019040 401.058.057.559 40208D:O[L CHANGEJ MAINT SER1 119.57
Page: 4
vch[ist Voi�Cher List Page: 5
1011912d�12 1:18:29PM Spo[cane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher �ate Vendor In�oice Fundl�ept DescriptNonlAccount Amount
27364 10/19/2012 000335 000335 TiRE-RAMA (Continued) Total : 119.57
27365 10/19/2012 003430 TOPSA PIZZA REFUI�D 001.000.000.319 OVER PYMT:GAMBLING TAX ENTE[ 28.75
Total : 28.75
27366 10/19/2012 003197 VIERTH, DALE&R1TA CRYWO�F 001.000,000.342 CRYVIIOLF REFUND: PERMIT#V33� 60_00
Total ; 60.00
27367 10/19/2012 002909 WA DEPT OF ENTERPRiSE SERVICES 1&'I-59048 001.090.000.518 4TH QTR 2012 CO-OP MEMBERSHI 500.00
Total : 500.00
27368 10/19/2012 000100 WABO INC. 24897 001.058.057.559 WABO 2012 FAL�BLlS{NESS MEEf 60.00
Total : 60.00
27369 10/19/2092 003002 XO COMMLlNICATIONS SERVICES 0253964302 001.090.440.518 INTERNEI"IDATA�1NES: OCTOBER 448.98
7otal : 448.9$
27370 70119f2012 001885 ZAYO GROUP LLC OCTOBER'I2 00'I.090.000.598 HIGH SPEED 1NTERNET CfTY HA�i 558.25
Total : 558.25
27371 10/19/2012 401885 ZAYO GROIJP LLC OCTOBER 2012 101_042_000_542 DARK FIBER��ASE 242.39
Totai : 242.39
'1017120027 10/17/2012 002244 AOT PUBLIC SAFEfI'CORPORATIOI� SPKVLY-32 001,016.000.521 CRYWOLF CHARGES:JULY 2012 2,953.92
TotaI : 2,953.92
52 Vauchers for bank code: apbank Bank total : 910,121.55
52 Vouchers in this report . Tatal vouchers: 910,121.55
Page: 5
�chlist Voucher List Page: 1
10126l2012 ��:37:35AM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
VoUCher Date Vendor Invoice Fundlpept DescriptionlAccount Amount
27372 10/26/2012 000958 AAA SWEEPING, LLC �48549 402.402.000.53$ 2012 S70RM bRA1N CLEANENG SE 3'I,958.78
7ota1 : 3'i,95$.78
27373 1012fi/2012 002931 ALL WES7�I�N lNDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 94365 'IO'I.000.000.542 SUPPLEES: PW 255.46
Total : 255.46
27374 1012fi/2012 001081 ALSCO LSP01219686 001.058.057.559 FLOOR MATS: BLDG 39.55
7otaN : 39.55
27375 1012fi12012 003076 AMSbEN, EFtICA EXPENSE 001.032.000.543 EXPENSE FtEfMBURSEMET�f7 17.76
Total : 'i7.76
27376 1Q/2612012000135 APA 1�17941285 001.058.056.558 2013ANNUALM�MBERSH[P-BARL 388.��
TotaI : 388.00
27377 10/26/2092 000234 ARLT, SHANE EXPENSE ��1.032.0�0.543 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 477.85
Total : 477.85
27378 10/26/2012 001012 ASSOC BUSINESS SYSTEMS 593351 001.413.015.515 COPIER COST: LEGAL 93.90
5935'I'I 001.058.050.55$ COPfEFt COST:Cb 613.32
Total : 707.22
27379 1Q126/2012 001816 BENTH[N&ASSOCIATES 1947 403.004.163.595 SPRAGUE UIC ELIMINATION SURV 2,364_00
7otal : 2,364.00
27380 'I0126/2012 0007fi8 BLACK BOX NE7WOFZK SVC SPO-035848 001.090.000.578 S�FZV[CE CALL�CITY HALL 1,145.70
SP0�035859 001.090.000.518 SERVICE CALL�CITY HALL 382.63
7otal : 1,528.33 ,
27381 1Q/26/2012 000673 BUDGETARBOR�LOGGING LLC 11-1709 141.042.444.542 TREE TRIMMING: PW 9,304.44
7otai : 1,304,40
27382 10/26/2012 000322 CENTURYLENK OCTOBER 2012 009.076.302.576 OC70BER 2012 PHONE:509-Z140 563.64
7ota1 : 563.64
27383 10126/2�12 0010�48 CiTY PAI�CEL WC9209551 001.058_057_559 COURIER SERVICES:CD 12.56
Page: 1
vchlist VO�cher List Page: 2
10126120�12 �1�1:37:35AM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept DescriptioNAcco�nt Amount
27383 'ID/26/2D'I2 DD'I048 001048 CITY PARCEL (CoRtinued) Tot�l : 12.56
27384 9D/26/2D'12 002838 COMMERCIAL GRADING [NS 12-'I27 1p1.042.ppp.542 UBNT BRIDGE INSPECTION 1,793.55
Total : 'I,793.55
27385 10/26/2012 00320'I COPE,MAIA CRYWOLF DDI.DOD.00D.342 CRYWOLF REFUND: PERMIT#V4$: 25.00
Total : 25.00
27386 10/26/2D12 000734 DEP7 OF TRANSPORTATION F2E-313-ATB21D09D59 1D1.042.DDD.542 STATE RDUTE F20ADWAY MAINT 5,453.09
RE-313-ATB21DD9D6D 1D1.042.DDD.542 SIGNAL&1LLUMiNATION IIAAIN 'I,536.76
Tota,l : 6,9$9.85
27387 1Dl2612D12 DOD278 DRISKELL, CARY EXPENSE DD1.013.D15_b1b DCPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 51p.94
Total : 510.94
27388 1D/26/2D12 002992 FREEDOM TRUCK CENTERS PC001114430=01 'ID'I.DOD.DDD.b42 SUPPLEES: PW 25.60
PC001115590:01 10'[.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 31.64
PCOD11168D9:01 101.000.00O.b42 SUPPLIES: PW 262.29
PC001117264:41 101,000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 18.87
Total : 338.40
27389 10/26/2412 002588 GRANICUS INC 39939 441.011.444.511 BROADCASTING SERVECES 719.59
7o�ai : 7'19_59
27390 10/26/2012 DD0917 GRAYBAR 962770808 101.042.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 489.32
962795753 101.042.00D.542 SUPPLIES: PW 78.55
962897443 101.042.00D.542 SUPPLIES: PW 349.80
9629239D8 'ID'I.D42.DDD.542 SUPPLIES: PW 138.79
Tot�l : 1,0�6.46
27399 90/26/2012 00'I'I'I2 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS D216D824 1p1.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 1,13922
7otal : �I,139.22
27392 1p/26/2012 002043 HDR ENGWEERiNG, INC OOOT43Tf'rb 4D3.DDD.163.595 SPRAGUE SWALE UPGRADE DESI 30,856.T8
Total : 30,856.18
27393 1Dl26/2D12 002520 HUSKY IN7ERNATIONALTRUCKS 73104 1D1.DDD.DDD.542 b3178D: PAR7S/SUPPLIES 346.50
73749 101.00O.00D.542 47361D:SUPPLIES 1pp_31
Page: 2
�ch[ist Voucher List � Page: 3
�0126120�2 ��[.37:35AM Spokane VaCNey
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor IRVOice F�ndlDep� I�escriptiortlAccount Amount
27393 1D12612D12 00252Q HUSKY[N7ERNA7EONAL 1RUCKS (Continued)
73750 101.000.000.542 47361 D: PARTSI SUPPLIES � 315.49
Total : 762.30
27394 'I012fi120'I2 DD2518 INIAND PACIF[C HOSE&FlTfNGS 48Q893 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 111.48
48�894 101.000,000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 28.49
4816Q4 1Q1.000.000_542 SUPPLIES: PW 49.56
7otal : 189.53
27395 'I0126120'I2 000265 JACKSON,MEKE November 2012 QQ1.013.000.513 MONTHLYAUTO ALLQWANCE 300.��
Total : 300.44
27396 10/26/2012 003185 LAMB,ERIK EXPENSE QQ1.013.015.515 EXPENSE FtEIMBURSEMENT 417.10
Tptal : 4�[7.10
27397 1Q12612Q12 001944 LANCER LTD 0430333 001.032.QQQ,543 NAME PLATES: PW 26.09
Tota[ : 26.09
27398 10/26/2012 000482 LANDTEK, LLC 482fi 3Q3.303.1fiQ.595 EVERGREEN RD RECQN.SURVEY 552.5�
Totai : 552,50
27399 1Q126/2Q12 003203 MICKELSEN, LEDNE CRYWQLF QQ1.00O.QQQ.342 CRYWOLF REFUND: PERMIT#V48' 25.00
TotaI : 25.00
274QQ 1Q/26/2�12 001035 NEfWORK DESIGN&MANAGEMENT 21836 009.090.000.51$ SOFfWARE MAINTENANCE 1,831.60
Total : 1,831.60
274Q9 9Q/26/2092 D02709 NQRTHWEST FiOSE&FITT[NGS 394293-001 '101.000.00�.542 SUPPLIES: PW 134,31
394293-002 101.000.000,542 SUPPLIES: PW 3.94
Total : 13$.25
27402 10/26/2012 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 'I574919041 001.018.014.514 OFFNCE SUPPL[ES: FINANCE 11.61
627790594001 001.032.000.5�43 OFFICE SUPPL[ES: PW 16.$9
62783567$001 001.032.000.543 OFFICE SUPPL[ES: PW 18.69
627$5'I306001 001.Q32.000.543 pFFICE SUPPLIES: PW 338.18
62824280000'I 001.Q32.000.543 OFFIC�SUPPLIES: PW 4.63
62833923700'I 001.Q32,000.543 OFFICE SUPPLIES: PW 138.4$
Page: 3
vChlist VOUCheI' LiS'k Page: 4
10/26/2012 11:37:35AM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor In�oice FundlDept DescripiioNAccount Amount
27402 10/26/2012 000652 000852 OFF[CE DEP071NC. (Continued) Total : 326.48
27403 10/26/2012 000307 OFFIC�OF 7N�S7A7E 7REASUREFt Septem�er 2012 001.0'[6.000.586 STATE REMITTA�[CE 44,038.17
Total : 44,038.17
27444 10/26/2012 000029 P17N�Y BOW�S[�[C 5502044931 001.090.000.518 SUPPLIES FOR POSTAG�METER 71.69
Total : 71_69
27405 10/26/2012 000019 PURRFECT LOGOS, 1NC. 30150 009.058.05fi.558 NAME PLATE FFtED BEAULAC 16.31
Total : 7 6.31
27406 10/26/2012 001071 ROAD PRODUC7S II�[C. PAYAPP '1 'f0'1.042.000.542 PAV�ME�IT MARKII�lG REMOVAL 6,288.10
Total : 6,288.10
27407 10/26/2012 000235 S�CURE SHRED 83340 009.090.000.518 ShIREDDING CNARG�S:S�PT�MB 167.10
84226 00'1.090.000.518 SHREDDING CNARGES:OCTOBEF 167.10
Total : 334.20
27408 10/26/2092 000709 SENSK�LAWN 8�7REE CARE I�lC. 5262730 101.042.000.542 20'I2 EM�RG�NCYTRAFFEC CONT 169.57
5262734 101.042.000.542 20'12 EM�RG�NCYTRAFFIC CONT 1,045.48
Total : 1,27 5.05
27409 90/26/2012 002285 SKINFILL, LINDSEY EXPENSE 001.018,096.5'16 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 160.69
Total : 7 fi0.69
274�0 '10/26/2012 000308 SPOKA�lE CO PROSECUTING ATTY September 2012 001.016.000.586 CRIME V1CTIMS COMP�NSATIO�! F 633.05
Total : 633.05
27411 10/26/2012 002540 SPOKA�[E HOUSE OF NOS�1NC. 246542 101.042.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 5.57
Total : 5.57
27412 10/26/2012 002135 SPRAY CE�l7�R�LEC7R0�[ICS, WC 2'I6770 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 11,924.47
2'I677'I 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 93.18
2'i6772 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 17.00
Total : 12,034.65
27413 10/26/2012 000311 SPRINT 959698810-059 001.058.057.559 GPS PHON� 79.23
Page: 4
vchlist Voucher List Page: 5
10126l2012 11.37:35AM Spolcane Valley
Bank code: ap6an[(
Va�cher Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept DescriptionlAccount Amount
27493 '102612012 0003t4 000311 SPRINT (Continu�d) Totai : 71.23
27494 90/26/2012 000335 71F2E-RAMA 8080049'I47 001.Qb8,057.bb9 40211 D:O1L CHANGE AND TIRES 834.26
Total : 834.26
27495 90/26/2012 00'I464 TW TEL�COM 05045988 001.Q76,305.b7b [N7ERNE71DA7A LINESI PHONE 948.89
0507'I270 001.Q76.305.b75 WTERNT/DATA LINESI PHONE 1,'173.52
05'I32817 001.Q76.305.575 WTERNETIDATE LtNESIPHONE LII� 'I,'191.09
Total : 3,313.50
27416 10/26/2012 003135 UNITED RENTALS, {NORTH AMERICA) [i� 106197868-QQ1 101.042.000.542 EQUIPMENT RENTALS: PW 240.42
Total : 240.42
27417 10/26/2012 QQ1248 USKH, INC. 1372200-1 303.3Q3.156.595 Q756-TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING A� 2,549.59
Total : 2,549.59
27418 10/26/2012 QQ32Q5 WA STAT�DEPT OF GORRECTIONS Q912.&13-SCWGHQ '[0'I.Q42.000.542 SEPT 2Q12:STATE DOC WORK CRI 1,500.QQ
Toial : 1,500-00
27419 10/26/2012 QQQQ38 WAS7E MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 1616819-268'1�2 'I01.042.000.543 WASTE MGMT: MA[NT FACIL[TY 178.12
7oial : 178.92
27420 'I0/26/20'I2 QQ9Q9Q WELLS FARGO-NW SIGNALSUPPLY 1QQQ26396 403.000.163_595 PED[S7RIAN PUSH BU7TON POL�: 2,263.13
Toial = 2,263.73
2742'I '1012612012 000676 WEST 825897333 QQ1.013.Q15.515 SUSSCRIPTION CHARGES 280.99
7otai : 280.99
27422 1Q12612Q12 003202 WYCKOFF, NORMAN CF2YWOLF QQ1.00O.QQQ.342 CRYWOLF REFUND; PERMIT#�003: 25.00
To�aI : 25.00
1Q131397 1Q/26/2Q12 000409 DEPT OF REVENUE 3rd QTR 2042 QQ9.076.3Q2.576 USE TAX RETLlRN: COMBINED EXC 2,406.29
To�al : 2,406.29
52 Vo�chers for bank code: ap6ank Bank to�al : 166,275.60
52 Vo�chers iR this report 7otal�o�schers: 766,275.60
Page: 5
vchlist Voucher List Page: 1
10/2912012 1:09:39PM Spokan�Va1l�y
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Irnoice FundlDept DescripfiorlAccount Amotint
27423 1fl/29/2fl12 001606 BANNER BANK 0618 009.0'I'I.000.5'I'I SEPTEMBER 2D'I2:0618 74.07
4064 009.058.056,558 SEPTEMBER 20'I2:4064 2,a91.47
4375 001.0'I'I.000.5'I'I SEPTEMBER 20'I2:4375 45.00
4458 00'1.0'I'I.000.5'I1 SEPTEMBER 20'I2:4458 991.35
8861 001.076.305.575 SEPTEMBER 20'I2:8861 1,474.46
9D48 001.018,013.5'I3 SEP7EMBER 2012:9048 4,016.78
Tot�I : 8,293.Z 3
27424 '1a12912a'12 000918 BLUE R1660NI LINEN SllPPLY INC 9373501 001.076_305.575 LINI�N SIJPPLYAND SERVICE AT C 14$.03
9375524 001.076.305.575 LINEN AND SUPPLYAND SERVICE 14$.03
S4D41375 001.076_305.575 LINEN SUPPLYAND S�RVICE A7 C 241.64
SflD41377 001.076.305.575 LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY A7 C 148.75
Total : 606.45
27425 10/29/2012 001T69 C1T1'OF SPOKANE VALLEY October 2012 001.418.013.513 PET[Y CASH;74,75,76,77,78,79,8'l, 64.84
Total: 64.84
27426 10/29/2012 000326 COHSOLIDAT�D IRRIGATION#19 October2012 001.fl76.305.575 L7TILITIES: PARKS 541.10
Total : 541.10
27427 10/29/2012 400795 �ARTHWORKS R�CYCLING, INC. 29940 001.476.305.575 R�CYCLING COLLECTIO�i:CP 27.50
Total : 27.50
27428 10/29/2012 aaa246 FAST SPOKANE WATER DIST#1 Oct 2012 001_476_300.576 WATER CHARGES: EDG�CLIFF PA 524.51
Total : 524.51
27429 10/29/2012 flflfl741 HONEY Bl1CKEfS 1-54$249 001.076.300.576 HONEY BL7CKET RENTAL: PARKS '154.00
Total : 154.00
27430 10/2912012 441635 [SS FACILITYIEIJEN7 SERVICES 46327a 00'I.fl76.305.575 EVEN7 SERVICES AT CENTERPLAc 82.74
463302 001.076.305.575 EVENT SERVICES AT CEN7�RPLAc 78.84
463997 00'I.076.305.575 EVENT SERVICES A7 CEN7ERPLA� 118.24
Tot�l : 279.74
2743'I 'I0129120'I2 Oflfl252 LOWE"S BUSINESS ACCOUHT October 2092 00'I.076.305.575 OPEI�A7ING SUPPLIES:CP 432.93
Tot�l : 432.93
Page: 1
vChlist VOUC�7er L[St Page: 2
1 U12912012 1:09:39PM Spokane Valley
Bank code - apbank
Voucher �ate Vendor In�oice �undlDept �escriptionlAccount Amount
27432 10/29/2012 000910 MANTZ, GLORIA Expenses 001.Ob8.055.559 �CpENSE REIMBURSEMENT 17.27
Total : 17-27
27433 10/29/2012 000387 MODEL IRRIGATIO�[ DIST.#18 2012 001.076.300.b76 WATER CHARGESAPRILTO OCT'e 8�45.b3
� Total : 845.�3
27434 10/29/2012 001860 PLATT 2600287 001.076.305.b7b SUPPLIES: CP 43.9b
Total : 43.95
27435 10129/2D12 000415 R05AUERS 641949 001.076.301.574 SUPPL[ES: PARKSAI�ID REC 32.35
Total : 32.35
27436 10/29/2012 00093b SEF2VICE PAPEF2 CO 76686832 00'I.076.305.575 SUPPLIES FOF2 CEM"ERPLACE 921.92
76687425 001.076.305.b7b SUPPLI�S FOR CENTERPLACE 967.93
7otal : 1,889.8�
27437 10/29/2012 000854 SHERRY pRATT VA�[VOORHIS, I�[C 1349.06 309.309.165.594 0165 TERRACE V[EW PARK�PRO,. 1,842,76
'1350.05 309.000.172,594. CENTERPLACE SOUTFI LANDSCAF 451.20
Total : 2,293.95
27438 10/29/2012 QQ2285 SKINFILL, LINDSEY Expenses QQ1.D18.016.516 EXPE�[5E RE[MBURSEMENT 308.35
Totai : 308.35
27439 10/29/2012 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER D1ST#3 OcE 2012 101.042.000.542 WATER CHARGES: PW 101.91
Totat : 101.91
27440 1Q/2912Q12 001083 STA�IDARD PLBG HEATING CONTROLS 50086 009.076.305.575 WORK ORDEF2 22693 2,293.57
Total : 2,293.57
27441 10/29/2012 001791 STONE, MEKE EXpEi15E5 001.076.000.576 EXPENSE F2EIMBURSEMENT 871.95
7otal : 871.95
27442 9Q12912Q'12 DD3175 VIS1T SPOKANE 16192 105.105.001.557 2012 LODGING TAX REIMBURSEME 17,216,38
17621 001.076,000.576 2013 F2ENEWAL OF AMBASSADOR 90.00
'[7677 001.Q76.305.575 2Q13 F2EN�WAL OF AMBASSADOR 90.00
7ota1 : 17,236.38
27443 10/29/2012 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKA�[E 'I6'I68'I7-2681-0 001.076.305.575 WASTE MGMT=CE�[TERPLACE 764_20
Page: 2
vchlist Voucher List Page: 3
90129l2092 �:09:39PM Spokane Va11ey
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Irnoice Fundl�ept DescriptionlAccount Amount
27443 'IDJ29120'I2 DDDD38 WASTE MANAGEM�NT OF SPQKANE (Continued}
7fi7fi878-2fi81-4 001.016.000.521 WASTE MGMT:PRECINCT 292,64
Totaf: 1,056.84
21 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Sank total : 37,916.18
21 Vouchers in this report Total�ouchers: 37,916.10
I,tha undersigned,do certify under pe�alty of perjury,
that the materials ha�e bee�furnished,the services
ra�dered,or the labor performed as described herein
and that#he c[aim is j�st,due and an�npaid
obligation against the City of SpoEcane Va11ey,and thak
I am authorized to authentica4e and certify said Gaim.
Fina�ce Director Date
Mayor Date
Councif Mamber Date
Page: 3
vch[ist VOUCher LiSt Page: 'f
�11102I20�12 2:17:58PM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice F�ndlDept DescriptionlAccount Amount
27445 11/2/2092 003078 ALLWEST TESTING&EI�GfNEERENG 610�4 403.000.163.595 MATERIALS TESTING-PROJECT# 2,038.25
Total : 2,038.23
27446 11/2J2012 001081 ALSCO LSPO'1226109 00'I.058.057.559 FLOOR MATS BLDG DEPT 39.55
� Total : 39.33
27447 11/2J2012 003076 AMSD�N, ERICA E?CPENSE 001.032.000.543 EXPENSE FZEIMBURSEMENT 27.76
Total : 27.76
2744$ 11/2/2012 000135 APA 20297r1285 001.058.056.558 2013 M�MBERSH[P QUES 450.00
Total : 450.00
27449 11/?J2012 002638 ARROW CONSTRUCTlON SUPPLY 114002 001.032.000.543 SUPPLfES: PW 342_41
Totai : 342.41
27450 11/2/2012 000030 AVISTA 932320955 403.000.163.595 7103 E SPRAGUE: PROJECT 93232 509.40
99320956 403.000.163.595 7102 E SPRAGUE:PROJECT 99320! 509.40
total : 1,018.80
27459 'I'[/212012 00'I344 BENTLEY SYST�MS[NC 47486238 001.032.000.543 SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTtONIMAINI 521.76
Total : 521.76
27452 11/2120'I2 002517 BROWN BFARING CO INC 4975182 101.042.000.542 SLJPPLIES: PW 32.48
Total : 32.48
27453 11/2/2012 002562 CD"AMETALS 523356 10'IA00.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 121.07
'fotal : 121_07
27454 11/?J2012 000101 CDW-G S248841 009.090.000.518 COMPUTER SOFTWARFJHARDWAI 2,257.60
tota! : 2,237_60
27455 11/2/2012 000143 CITY OF SPQKANE OC70BEFZ 2072 707.042.000.542 TRAN[SFER S7A710N 215.31
totaI : 213.31
27456 11/?J2012 000026 CON7RAC7 RESOURCE GROUP INC 120460�0 001.058.057.559 PERMI7 CENTER RECONFIGURE 3,668.41
TotaI : 3,668,41
Page; 1
vChliSt VoucF�er List Page: 2
19102l2012 2:17:58PM Spokane Valiey
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor (nvoice FundlDept DescriptionlAccount Amount
27457 77/2/2012 007757 C011N7RY HOMES POWER EQU1P 99776 101.042.000,542 SUPPLIES: PW 134_01
TotaI : 134.01
27458 '1'l/?J20'12 000425 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS 60732 141.0�42.400.543 TOWER RENTAL 200.00
Total : 200.bb
27459 '17/212072 002604 �ELL FIPIANCIAL SERVICES LLC 76175692 401.090.000.5A.8 LEASE COI�lTRACT 1,087.48
Total : 1,087.48
27460 11C1J20'12 000365 DEPT OF LICENSING LICENSING 101.000.000_542 LICENSlNG FEES 2000 INTL 47.25
Total : 47.25
27461 11/2/2012 000912 DEX ME�IA WEST OCTOBER 2012 001.076,304.575 ADVERTISING FOR SENIOI�CEN7E 31.74
OCTOBER 2012 001,076.305.575 ADVERTISING FOR CENERPLACE 166.46
Total : 198.20
27462 11/2/2012 002213 Ep KA MANUFAC7UI�ING WC. 11242 10'I.000.000.542 pLOW PAI�7SILABOR 2,953.72
7otal : 2,953.72
27463 11/2/2012 002507 FASTE�IERS, I�IC S3464638.001 'IO'I,000.000.542 SUPPLlES: PW 49.83
Total : 49.$3
27464 11/2/2012 441447 FREE PRESS PUBL[SHING INC 38555 00'I.093.000.5'13 LEGAL pUBL[CA710PI 57.60
38556 00'I.0'13.000.5'13 LEGAL PUBL[CA710PI 47.60
38557 00'I.058.056.558 LEGAL PllBL[CA710PI 84.15
38596 00'I.058.056.558 LEGAL PUBL[CA710PI 11520
38597 001.032.000.543 LEGAL PllBLICATIOI�I 83.24
38640 00'I.0'13.000.513 LEGAL PllBLICATIOPI 25.44
7otal : 412.75
27465 11C1J2012 002975 FREEDOM SALES AND SUPPLY 2012532 00'I.032.000.543 SUPPLEES: PW 32.57
Total : 32.57
27466 111?J2012 444839 GENERAL FIRE EQUIP CO 4434389 502.502.000.518 FIRE EXTII�IGUESHER SERVICEISUI 486.38
Total : 486.38
27467 11/?J2012 000179 GFOA 4156864S 001.143.70.00 GFOA 2092 RENEWAL: DUFF�I' S0.44
Page: 2
vchlist Voucher List Page: 3
9'110212092 2:97:58PM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Vaucher Date Vendor In�oice FundlDept DescriptionlAccount Arnount
27467 11/?J2012 000179 000'179 GFOA (Continued) 'Cotal : 50.00
27468 11/?J2012 000007 GRAINGER 9958815830 001.032.000.543 SUPPLIES: PW 30.78
7otal : 30.78
27�469 111?J2012 003177 GUTH, ERIC EXPENSE 00'1.032.000.543 F,CPENSE FtEIMBURSEMENT 19.43
EXPENSE 001.032.000.543 DfPE1�SE REtMBUFtSEMENT 628.5�4
To�aI : 647.97
27470 11/2/2012 001728 HP FINANCIAL SERVICES CO December 20'I2 001.090.000.548 DECEMBER 2012: LEASE PAYMEN- 2,9'I8.78
Tota[ : 2,918.78
27471 99/?J2092 0025'18 EI�LAND PACfFIC HOSE 8�FITWGS 4820�4 101.000.000.5�42 SUPPLIES: PW 8.83
Total : 8.83
27472 '111?J20'12 002466 KENWORTH SALES 128226 101.000.000.542 PARTS&SUPPIES: PW 102.49
Total : 1�2.49
27473 1112120�2 003207 MERRITT,JEREMY CRYWOLF 00'I.000.000.342 CRYWOLF REFUf�[D: PERMfT V492. 25.00
Total : 25_00
27474 11/2J2012 000696 MtTEL BUSfNESS SYSTEM, INC 9b0129�6 007.090.000.518 b330 IP PHONE 2,654.45
Total : 2,654.4�
27�475 11/2/2012 000662 NATL BARRICADE&SIGI�CO 7$109 402.402.000.�38 SUPPLIES: PW �421.10
Total : 421.10
27476 11/2J2012 000193 NORTHWEST CHRISTIAI�SCHOOL INC 31�D QTR 2012 CAM 001.090.000.518 31�D Q7R CAM CHARGES 'I,010_17
Total : 1,010.17
27�477 11/?J2012 000064 SCHIMMELS, GARY F,CPENSE 001.011.000.�11 EXPENSE REIMBUF2SEMEI�iT 974.71
'Cotal : 174.71
27478 11/2/2012 000709 SE�[SKE LAWN 8�TREE CARE f1�C. 4524998 101.042.000.5�42 2012 EMERGENCYTRAFFIC CONT 542.74
'Cotal : �42.71
27479 14/2/2042 000318 SHAMROCK PAVWG INC PAYAPP 4 303.303.160.595 EVERGREEN ROA!]COI�S7'RUCTI( 82,908.22
Total : 82,908.22
Page: 3
vchli5t Vo�cher List Page: 4
99/02/2092 2:17:58PM Spokane Va[Iey
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor In�oice FundlDept DescriptionlAccount Amount
2748Q 'I1/212012 002531 S[X ROBBLEES INC r6523QQ 101.QQQ.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 68.38
5-652316 101.QQQ.000.542 SUPPL[ES: PW 72,g3
5-65231fr1 101.QQ0.000.542 SUPPLfES: PW 76.'�D
5�52334 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW �g.3�[
r652363 101.00O.00D.542 SUPPLIES; PW 96.07
Total : 251_69
27481 11/?J2012 0011�40 SPECIAL ASPHALT PRODUCTS 1NVC060478 '101.042.00D.542 SUPPLIES: PW 1,851.79
1NVC060483 'f0'1.042.QQQ.542 SUPPLIES: PW 1,822.&4
TOtal : -3,674_63
27482 11/2/2012 000474 SPOKANE CO PAf2KS&REC September 2012 QQ1.143.7Q.00 2013 SPOKANE INTERSTATE FAIR 5,50Q,00
Tot�I : 5,500.00
27483 11/?J2012 002540 SPOKANE HOLISE OF FiOSE INC. 249225 1Q1.00O.QQQ.542 SUPPLIES: PW 23,57
249238 1Q1.00O.QQQ.542 SUPPLIES: PW '�3.$7
totaI : 37_44
27484 '1']/2/20'12 000862 SPOKANE ROCK PRODUCTS, fI�C. PAYAPP 1 311.000.162.5�41 2012 STREE7 PRESERVATION PRC 576,470.99
7otaf: 576,470.99
27485 1'f/?J2092 QQ2935 SPRAY CENTER ELECTRONICS, INC 296851 101.000_000,542 SLIPPLIES: PW/MA[I�T FACILITY 25.Q6
216852 101.000.000.542 SiJPPLIES: PW 86.79
216853 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW ..52.gQ
216936 'IO'I.000.000.542 SLIPPLIES: PW 380.45
216937 'IO'I.00O.ODD.542 SUPPLIES: PW 77.14
216938 'IO'I.000.000,54�2 SLIPPLIES: PW 828.42
Total : 1,344.9$
27486 11/?J2Q12 QQQQ65 STAPLESADVANTAGE 31$5066888 001.Q93.000.513 OFFICE SUPPLIES:COUNCfL 76.75
Total = 76.75
27487 11/?J2Q12 QQQ261 7HRIFTY RENT A CAR AUTO SALES AUG 12-1048 001.Q9Q.000.548 AiJG:SUZUKI V1N 302$46 RENTAL i 544.49
AUG 92-1049 001.Q9Q.000.548 AiJG:SUZUKI V]N 305171 REN7AL 4 544.49
AUG '12-1050 402.4Q2.000.538 AiJG: HONDA VIN Q33896 RENTAL( 544.49
JUL 12-1045 001.Q9Q.000.548 JL1LY:SLIZUKI V[I�302846 REI�7AL 544_49
JUL 12-'1046 001.Q9Q.000.545 JUL=SiJZUK]VIN 3D5'I71 REI�TAL C 544.49
JUL 12�']0�47 402.4Q2.000.538 JUL: HONDA VIN D33896 ftEfVTAL C 544.49
Page: 4
vchlist Voucher List Page: 5
'11l02120'12 2:'17:58PM Spakane Valley
Bank code: apbanEc
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept DescriptionlAccount Amount
27487 11/7J2012 000261 THRIFTYRENTACARAUTOSALES (Continued}
JUN '12-1044 009.090.QQQ.548 JUN:SUZUKI V1N 305171 RENTAL( 544.49
JUN�12-1043 QQ'1.090.QQQ_548 JUNE;SUZUK�VIN 302846 RENTAL 544.49
MAY 12-1041 QQ9.090.QQQ.548 MAY: SUZUKI VIN 302846 RENTAL( 544.49
MAY 92-1042 QQ1.090.QQQ.548 MAY:SUZUKI V1N 305171 RENTqL t 544.49
OCT 12-1038 QQ1.090.QQQ.548 OCT:SUZUKI V[N 3Q2846 CAR RE� 544.49
OCT 12-'�039 QQ1,090.000.548 OCT:SUZUKI VIN 3Q5171 RENTAL( 5�44.49
OCT 12-1040 402.402.000.538 OCT: HQNDA V1N 033896 RENTAL( 544.49
SEP 12-1051 00'I.090.000.548 S�PT:SUZUK[VIN 3Q2846 CAR RE 54,4.49
SEP 12-1052 00'I.090.000.548 S�P: SUZUKI VIN 305171 RENTAL( 54,4.49
SEP 12-1053 402.402.000.538 SEP: HONDA 033896 RENTAL CAR 544.49 ,
Total : 8,71�.84
27488 11/?J2Q12 OQ2254 TOWEY,TOM EXP�NSE 001.Q'i1.000.511 EXPENSE REIMBURS�MENT 217.6Q
Total : 2�7.60
274$9 11/2/2012 002185 URS CORPORATION 5269909 001.Q58.158.558 SHORELIN�MAST�R PROGRAM 4,254.95
Total : 4,254.95
27490 'I'I/212012 003206 VAN N�SS FELDMAN, LLP 99407 001.Q58.056.558 PROF�SSIONAL SERVICES 2,995.00
Total: 2,915.00
2749'1 11/2/2012 000087 VERIZON WfREL�SS 'I'12908560 001.016.000.521 AIR CARD FOR POLICE CHIEF 40.01
1129510524 001.016.000.52'I AIR CARDS FQR POLfCE DEPARTi4 8Q3,20
1129516371 101.042.000.542 NOV 2012-VERIZON CELL PHONE: 1,Q85.48
6802078263 101.042.000.542 NQV 2012-�W[REL�SS DATA CARD; 56Q.14
Total : 2,488.83
27492 11/2/2012 002909 WA DEPT OF�NT�RPRtSE SERVICES 1�1-13184 10'1.042.000.594 VEHICLE PURCHASE: R�F#12-28E 18,QQQ.00
Total : 18,000.00
27493 11/?J2012 001580 WSU CASHI�RS-SPS 5058720 QQ7.090.QQQ.550 S[TE SELECTOR CONTRACT#90$ 9,196,7�
To�al : 9,196.7�
'I03012QQ25 1Q/30/2Q12 000001 SPOKANE CO TRFJ�SURER 9290200391 flfl1.016_QQQ_521 LP.W ENFORCEMENT 1,368,839.84
Total : 1,368,839.84
103'I120QQ2 10/31/2012 002134 FIRSTAMERICANT[TLE 4251-1968763 31Q.000.161.594 PURCHASE OF LAND FROM PRINC 2,509,668.00
Page: 5
�chlist Voucher LiSt Page: 6
1�1102l2012 2»17.58PM Spokane Valley
BaRk code: apb�nk
Vo�scher Date Vendor Irnoice FundlDept DescriptionlAccount AmouRt
103'['[20002 '[0/3�/2012 002�34 002134 FIRSTAMERICAN TNTLE (Contin�ed) Total : 2,501,668_00
51 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank totaI • 4,611,480.05
51 Vouchers in this report Total�ouchers : a,611,480.05
f,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury,
that the Rtaterials have been furnished,the services
rendered,ar the[abor perFormed as described herein
and thatthe Gaim is just,due a�d an unpaid
obligation againsY the City of Spokane Valley,and that �
I arrt avthorized to authenticate and certify said Gaim.
Finance director �ate
Mayor Qate
Council Member aate
Page: 6
vchlist Voucher List Page: 7
7710212D12 3:53:37PM Spokane Valley
Bank code: aphank
Voucher Date Vendor � Invoite FundlDept destriptionlAccount qmount
4�i27 11/5/2012 OOOd48 VANTAGE TRANSFERAGENTS,409A PLAN Ben46509 Op1_23'1.94.00 401A:Payment 23,478,56
Total: 23,478.56
412$ 11/5/2012 OOp682 �FTPS Ben46511 00'i.231.91.0a FEbERALTAXES:Payment 34,2Z6.23
7otaN: 34,216.23
4129 11/5/2p12 000145 UANTAGEPOINTTRANSFERAGENTS,457 PLf Ben46513 001.231.18.00 457 DEF�RRED COMPENSA7[ON:Payr 6,403.10
Total: 6,4Q3.i D
4130 11/5/2092 000'(62 VANTAGE TRANSFERAGENTS,401A�XEC Pl Ben46515 001.231.14,Op 4a1 EXEC PLAN;Payment 9,052,33
Total: 1,052.33
4']41 'i1/5/20'[2 OOa682 EFTPS Ben46519 p01.231,91.00 FEDERALTAXES:Payment 743.24
Total: 743.24
27494 11/5/2a12 000120 AWC Ben46499 001.231.�6.00 HEALTH PLANS: Payment 106,278.00
$en46597 001.231.'i6.p0 HFALTH PLANS(COUNCIL}:Payment 8,20�4.00
Totat: t74,A82.00
27495 11/5/2012 000165 DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS Ben46501 001.231.15.00 PERS: Payment 58,058.90
7ota[: 58,D58.90
27496 11/5/2012 002227 IDAHp TAX COMMISSlON Ben46503 403.231.50.03 IDAHp STATE TAX BASE:Payment 1,384,23
Tota[: 1,384.23
27497 1'1/512012 a00699 WACOUNC[LCO/C1TY EMPLOYEES Ben46505 001.231.2'�.p0 UN10N DUES: Payment 2,239,42
Tota[: 2,239.42
27498 19/5/2012 002574 WP+SHINGTON TRUST BANK Ben46507 001.231,2p.a0 BERG201'l0-02-03952-�: Payment 910.28
Tota[: 990.28
1 D Vouchers for bank code: apb3nk Bank total: 242,968.29
1 D Vouchers i�this report 7ota1 vouchers: 242,968.29
Page: 1
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 11-13-2012 Department DirectorApproval : ❑
Item: Check all that apply: � consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Payroll for Period Ending October 31, 2012:
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND:
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
Budget/Financial impacts:
Employees Council Total
Gross: $ 252,268.96 $ 5,475.00 $257,743.96
Benefits: $ 134,327.38 $ 5,060.05 $139,387.43
Total payroll $ 386,596.34 $ 10,535.05 $397,131.39
STAFF CONTACT: Raba Nimri
DRAFT
MINUTES
City of Spokane Valley
City Council Regular Meeting
Formal Meeting Format
Tuesday,October 23,2012
Mayor Towey called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
Attendance: Citv Staff
Tom Towey, Mayor Mark Calhoun, Finance Director
Gary Schimmels, Deputy Mayor Cary Driskell, City Attorney
Dean Grafos, Councilmember John Hohman, Community Development Dir.
Brenda Grassel, Councilmember Mike Stone,Parks &Rec Director
Chuck Hafner, Councilmember Steve Worley, Senior Engineer
Ben Wick, Councilmember Scott Kuhta,Planning Manager
Arne Woodard, Councilmember Mike Basinger, Senior Planner
Carolbelle Branch,Public Information Officer
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
INVOCATION: Pastor Isaac Hebden of the Intersection Church gave the invocation.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Towey led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously
agreed to approve the amended agenda.
INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: n/a
COMMITTEE,BOARD,LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS:
Councilmember Hafner: reported that he attended an STA (Spokane Transit Authority) Operational
meeting; went to Spokane Valley's audit e�t with the State Auditors; attended an all-day conference
concerning crime prevention; went to the Wal-Mart ribbon cutting; attended another STA Board meeting
then went to a SCOPE Board meeting; and attended yet one more STA meeting where they evaluated
proposals on the painting of transit vehicle advertising services.
Councilmember Grassel: said she attended a Visit Spokane, formerly Spokane Convention and Visitor's
Bureau, Board meeting where they discussed the upcoming budget participated in the Lodging Tax
Committee meeting and said that Committee's recommendations will be coming to Council at a future
meeting; attended the Washington Policy Center Dinner, which is a think tank group that educates the
legislators on different upcoming issues like transportation, education, and health care; went to the Cup of
Cool Water Dinner, which is a Christian ministry in the City of Spokane, and explained that they help
homeless kids to provide them a place to stay, and help with their education.
De�utv Mavor Schimmels: explained that he attended the City's Exit Audit with the State Auditor's;went
to the Wal-Mart open house, attended a transportation meeting hosted by Commissioner Mielke; and went
to the STA Board Meeting.
Councilmember Grafos: said he attended the VIP Night and the grand opening at the new Wal-Mart; the
Washington Policy Center Dinner; and the City's audit e�t meeting with the State Auditors.
Councilmember Wick: said he also attended the Audit Exit Conference; and the Regional Transportation
Meeting called by Commissioner Mielke.
Council Regular Meeting 10-23-2012 Page 1 of 5
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
Councilmember Woodard: said he went to the HCDAC(Housing and Community Development Advisory
Committee) and explained that HCDAC makes recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners
concerning allocation of CDBG (Community Development Block Grant) funds; went to the Wal-Mart
VIP night the City audit the Washington Policy Center Annual Dinner; spoke at the Spokane Mortgage
and Lenders meeting concerning the last twenty-five years and what's happening now with real estate;
attended a City forum at the downtown First Presbyterian Church; a variety of Chamber of Commerce
functions; and attended the Providence Children's Hospital presentation.
MAYOR'S REPORT: Mayor Towey reported that he attended most of the meetings and events already
mentioned; he thanked Finance Director Calhoun and his staff for a great auditor's e�t went to the
Policy Center dinner; attended a Crime Prevention meeting; the Wal-Mart grand opening; went to the
AWC (Association of Washington Cities) Conference in Pullman where he heard a prelude to what will
happen in Olympia concerning legislative priorities and the latest revenue forecasts and trends; and went
to the Park Place Wellness Fair. Mayor Towey then read the Proclamation for National Food Day, which
was received with thanks from Jandyl, Member Services Coordinator of Second Harvest.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mayor Towey invited public comments.
Mary Pollard, 17216 E Baldwin: spoke concerning an intersection on a new development going in an area
near her; said the problem is zoning and that people want to keep it the way it is; she suggested building
some kind of predictability into the Code so the zone can "be the zone;" said she wants a comp plan that
addresses that also voiced her concern about the "T" of intersections never lining up; said there should be
safety built into the community and have roads align where feasible; also addressed minimum standards
for parcels, and said if we create smaller and smaller lot sizes, there won't be space for gardens or for kids
to play.
Najah Aishah, 18518 E Cowle,y, Johnston's Mobile Home Park: said she has lived there for over a year;
there are about thirteen mobile homes in their community; they are on limited incomes; and even though
the homes are "mobile homes" it would be difficult to move them; she asked for an ordinance as a place
holder for a mobile home park as we await the outcome of the Tumwater Court ruling.
Randy Chapman, Vice President of Association of Manufactured Home Owners (AMHO), PO Box
142173, Spokane Wa: expressed similar concern as the previous speaker, and he read a statement from
Dan Barrett, President of the AMHO urging Council to include in the workplan for 2013, something that
would amend the comprehensive plan to allow for a mobile home park zone.
JoAnn Weaver, 26012 N Barker Road, S�ace ll4: RiverRose Villa�e; said she wrote a letter to Council
on September 19, and she reiterated the contents of that letter; that if they were asked or forced to leave
their mobile home park, it would be a huge impact, and she asked for an ordinance now as a placeholder
so it would be part of staff's workplan for 2013, so when the Tumwater Decision is made, Council can
move forward accordingly.
1. PUBLIC HEARING: Community Development Block Grant Proposed Projects—Scott Kuhta
Mayor Towey opened the public hearing at 6:42 p.m. Planning Manager Kuhta explained the CDBG
(Community Development Block Grant) process and the three proposed projects; said the projects must
be located in residential, low to moderate-income areas. Mr. Kuhta said that Councilmember Wick had
previously inquired about using CDBG funds to sewer industrial property in the northeast portion of the
City; but he said while funds could be used for economic development purposes, the City must document
how the project would benefit low and moderate income residents, and that we would be required to
monitor employment growth in the area as well as provide information on the number of low and
moderate income individuals employed as a result of the project, and therefore, he said staffrecommends
not adding that to the list of potential or proposed projects. Mr. Kuhta said he believes the first two
Council Regular Meeting 10-23-2012 Page 2 of 5
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
projects should be moved forward as staff believes those projects meet council's priority for pavement
preservation. Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered and Mayor Towey
closed the public hearing at 6:46 p.m.
2. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any
member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered
separately.
a. Approval of the following claim vouchers:
VOUCHER LIST DATE VOUCHER NUMBERS; TOTAL AMOUNT
10/04/2012 27160-27189 $35,379.66
10/OS/2012 27190-27244; 928120032; 1004120022 $1,542,875.09
10/OS/2012 4093-4096; 27245-27250 $260,265.06
10/12/2012 27252-27290; 1005120023; 1710914170 $488,80436
GRAND TOTAL $2,327,324.17
b. Approval of Payroll for period ending October 15, 2012: $283,174.28
c. Approval of Minutes of October 2, 2012 Council Study Session Meeting
d. Approval of Minutes of October 9, 2012, Council Formal Format Meeting
e. Resolution 12-005, Ratification of Spokane Housing Authority Commission Amendment
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the Consent
Agenda.
NEW BUSINESS:
3. Second Readin�Pro�osed Ordinance 12-026 Amendin� SVMC 7.05—Carv Driskell
After City Clerk Bainbridge read the proposed ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels
and seconded to approve Ordinance 12-026 amending Spokane T�alley Municipal Code 7.05 relating to
nuisance conditions. After Mr. Driskell briefly went over the proposed changes, Mayor Towey invited
public comment. No comments were offered. T�ote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:
None. Motion carried.
4. Second Readin�Proposed Ordinance 12-027 Amendin� SVMC 17.100—Cary Driskell
After City Clerk Bainbridge read the proposed ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels
and seconded to approve Ordinance 12-027 amending Spokane T�alley Municipal Code 17.100 relating to
Code enforcement. After Mr. Driskell briefly went over the proposed changes, Mayor Towey invited
public comment. No comments were offered. T�ote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:
None. Motion carried.
5. Motion Consideration: Pines Road ITS (#0061)Project, Bid Award— Steve Worley
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to award the Pines Road ITS Project to the
lowest responsible bidder, Aztech Electric, Inc. in the amount of$949,160.78 and authorize the City
Manager to execute the construction contract. Senior Engineer Worley explained the project as per his
October 23, 2012 Request for Council Action Form; and mentioned that three closed-circuit cameras will
be installed as well, on Pines at Valleyway, Trent, and at Mission. Mr. Worley also mentioned that staff
has coordinated this project with WSDOT (Washington State Department of Transportation) to have the
conduit before WSDOT comes in to grind and overlay. Mayor Towey invited public comment no
comments were offered. T�ote by Acclamation:In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried.
6. Motion Consideration: Interlocal A�reement with Kin� Co Directors Association—Cary Driskell
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to authorize the City Manager to finalize and
execute the Interlocal purchasing agreement with the King County Directors'Association. City Attorney
Driskell explained that the City is authoriaed under state law to use the purchasing contracts of other
Council Regular Meeting 10-23-2012 Page 3 of 5
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
jurisdictions in the state by following certain rules and said this proposed interlocal agreement meets
those requirements, and that this will enable the City to purchase computers and other IT equipment at
cost savings. Mayor Towey invited public comment no comments were offered. T�ote by Acclamation:In
Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried.
Added Agenda Item:
6a. Motion Consideration: 2013 CDBG(Community Development Block Grant)Pro�ram Proj ects— Scott
Kuhta
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to direct staff to prepare CDBG Applications for
the Adams Road, and 4X"Avenue resurfacing projects. Planning Manager Kuhta mentioned that these are
the projects he described as part of tonight's public hearing. Mayor Towey invited public comment no
comments were offered. T�ote by Acclamation:In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mayor Towey invited public comments; no comments were offered.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS:
7. Code Text Amendment, Multi-Family Re�ulations—Mike Basin�
Senior Planner Basinger explained that in the past, the City processed some contentious, privately
initiated, site-specific map amendments as part of the annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment process;
and as a result, staff researched changes to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code to mitigate the impacts to
multi-family development when it is adjacent to single-family development. As per his PowerPoint
presentation, Mr. Basinger explained about the proposed code text amendment said there are two
proposals tonight, one is having a relational height limit to single-family residential use or zone of a 1:1
height to setback ratio with a ten-foot minimum setback from single-family residential use or zone; and
the other proposal is a proposal from the Planning Commission recommending where new multi-family
development is abutting an adjacent parcel with a single-family use or zone, the height of the new multi-
family development may not increase by more than 45 degrees when measured from the angle that
originates at 25 feet above the applicable property line, creating a 1:1 height-to-setback ratio to the
abutting single-family use or zone, and that the minimum setback from a single family use or zone should
be ten feet from the property line. Mr. Basinger said staff feels either proposal would meet the objective
tasked by Council. There was discussion about which proposal is preferred; what the City of Spokane
and Spokane County's regulations are; with final consensus from Council to go with the Planning
Commission recommendation as it would be more compatible with the other jurisdictions. It was also
decided to bring this back for a first reading at the November 13 council meeting.
At 7:37 p.m., Mayor Towey called for a recess;he resumed the meeting at 7:49 p.m.
8. Comprehensive Plan Docket discussion—John Hohman/Mike Basin�er
Community Development Director Hohman explained that as a process of the Comprehensive Plan
update, he wanted to determine what they could initiate with current staff and budget. Via his PowerPoint
presentation, Senior Planner Basinger then explained the city-initiated text and map amendments, after
which discussion focused on the slide showing additional docket considerations. Mr. Basinger also noted
that Chapter 6 of the Comprehensive Plan will not be addressed this year as the Parks and Recreation
Master Plan won't be ready for another year. The "additional docket considerations" included (1) add
policies and goals to further support AutoRow; (2) consider revising the Land Use Map to include more
opportunities for multi-family development (3) add policies and goals relating to food systems; (4) revise
the local access street map to include connections along Appleway Boulevard; (5) add policy language to
include sidewalks and pathways for low income neighborhoods; (6)include policy language on pavement
preservation; and (7) add extension of Shared Use Pathway to newly purchased property. Both Director
Hohman and Senior Planner Basinger explained that including items on the docket enables staff to begin
work on those issues, and Mr. Basinger stated that by putting a consideration in the plan, we also might
Council Regular Meeting 10-23-2012 Page 4 of 5
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
be able to get financing assistance. By consensus, Council determined to keep the additional docket
considerations on for the 2013 docket with the exception of#4,which deals with local access street map.
The topic of manufactured homes was also discussed and it was ultimately decided not to include that
topic on the 2013 docket, but to get information from staff for making a decision in 2014, with City
Attorney Driskell adding that staff will work toward bringing forth that information in March 2013.
At 8:55 p.m., it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to extend the
meeting for th�irty minutes.
9. Re�ulation of Commercial Vehicles—Cary Driskell
City Attorney Driskell went over the draft language, and added that he would also bring forth a separate
resolution as a type of master list for local deliveries only; and said he will also discuss the weight and
other issues with Traffic Engineer Note, and will also work on refining the language further concerning
landscaping to cover such things as trucks used for taking down trees. There was Council consensus that
this draft move forward at a future council meeting.
At 9:30 p.m., it was moved by Deputy Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to extend the
meeting another thirty minutes.
10.Plannin� Commission Rules of Procedure—Cary Driskell
Community Development Director Hohman explained that staff met with Planning Commission Chair
Bates who feels very strongly about the work the Planning Commission did to make the changes to the
Rules and Procedures, that they spent three meetings discussing this and the trigger points for absent
commissioners, and that Mr. Bates feels strongly that the e�sting language is sufficient for the chair to
conduct their duties, that he would be a very strong advocate for attendance, and asked that Council
consider staying with the existing language, which permits greater flexibility for the Planning
Commission Chair. After brief discussion, Council concurred not to make further changes, with
Councilmember Grassel adding that she is okay with this draft, but has concerns and would have
preferred to include clarifying language about whether the absence is legitimate.
ll. Advance A�enda
Councilmember Woodard asked about the possibility of not meeting November 6. After brief discussion,
it was determined to keep the November 6 meeting as planned. There were also no objections to having
the winter workshop/retreat February 19, and not include an evening meeting as has been done in the past.
INFORMATION ONLY(will not be reported or discussed):
12. Department Reports were for information only and were not reported or discussed.
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: Mr. Calhoun had no comments.
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting
adjourned at 9:47
Thomas E. Towey, Mayor
ATTEST:
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
Council Regular Meeting 10-23-2012 Page 5 of 5
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
MINUTE S
SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
STUDY SESSION FORMAT
Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers
Spokane Valley,Washington
October 30,2012 6:00 p.m.
Attendance:
Councilmembers Staff
Tom Towey, Mayor Mike Jackson, City Manager
Gary Schimmels, Deputy Mayor Cary Driskell, City Attorney
Dean Grafos, Councilmember Mark Calhoun,Finance Director
Brenda Grassel, Councilmember John Hohman, Community Development Dir.
Chuck Hafner, Councilmember Eric Guth,Public Works Director
Ben Wick, Councilmember Mike Stone,Parks &Recreation Director
Arne Woodard, Councilmember Inga Note Tra�c Engineer
Lori Barlow, Senior Planner
Rick VanLeuven,Police Chief
Carolbelle Branch,Public Information Officer
Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk
Roll CaIL Mayor Towey called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all
Councilmembers were present.
ACTION ITEMS:
1. Second Readin�Proposed Ordinance 12-024 Adoptin�2013 Bud�et—Mark Calhoun
After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and
seconded to approve Ordinance 12-024 adopting the 2013 Budget. Finance Director Calhoun gave a very
brief synopsis of the changes made as a result of the October 9 first reading of the ordinance, and
explained that during the �rst reading, we failed to consider that Fund #310 had an appropriation of
$499,623 that was a transfer to Fund #314 Park Development Fund; and by eliminating Fund 314, it
invalidated the transfer, as a result,he said,the transfer has been eliminated. Mayor Towey invited public
comment no comments were offered. T�ote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None.
Motion carried.
2. Second Readin�Proposed Ordinance 12-025 Amendin�2012 Bud�et—Mark Calhoun
After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and
seconded to approve Ordinance 12-025 amending Ordinance 11-017 adopting a budget for the period
.Ianuary 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012. Finance Director Calhoun again gave a brief overview of
the proposed changes in the 2012 budget, all as noted in his October 30, 2012 Request for Council Action
form. Mayor Towey invited public comment no comments were offered. T�ote by Acclamation: In Favor:
Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried.
3. Pro�osed Resolution 12-006 Plannin�Commission Rules of Procedure—Carv Driskell
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to approve Resolution 12-006 adopting
Planning Commission Rules of Procedure. City Attorney Driskell said there have been no changes in the
proposed rules since the last administrative report. Mayor Towey invited public comment no comments
were offered. T�ote by Acclamation:In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried.
Council Study Session Minutes 10-30-12 Page 1 of 3
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
NON-ACTION ITEMS:
4. Draft Environment Desi�nations, Shoreline Master Plan—Lori Barlow
Senior Planner Barlow introduced Attorney Tadas Kisielius, with whom the City has contracted as a
special counselor to assist with the Shoreline Master Plan. Ms. Barlow explained that with the assistance
of the URS Corporation, staff has completed the draft Environment Designations,which is the third phase
of the Shoreline update process, and that the designations are required by the SMA (Shoreline
Management Act) and they provide the framework for uniformly applying the goals and policies, and she
also explained the use regulations within each designation. Via her PowerPoint presentation, Ms. Barlow
explained the definition of environment designation, what is required, proposed designations and general
criteria, followed by an explanation of the environment designation map. Mr. Kisielius discussed such
things as shoreline environment designations as well as parallel designations. Mr. Barlow ended her
presentation by explaining the continuing process, which would be a resolution for council approval
consideration during the November 13 meeting; that the next piece is the restoration plan followed by a
public access plan, which she said has not yet gone to the Planning Commission; afterwards the
development regulations, which are under development by URS Corporation, will probably be addressed
at the beginning of next year; she also mentioned staff is about three months behind the desired goal, but
continues moving forward and as per the Department of Ecology, as long as we continue moving forward,
we are still in good standing, and said she anticipates having a draft completed and ready for local
adoption by next summer. There were no additional questions or comments from Council.
5. I-90 Way�ndin� Si�na�e Project—In�allote
Senior Traf�c Engineer Note explained about the different types of signage for I-90, and of the
procedures and costs associated with re-establishing a business route along Sprague Avenue, and
mentioned if we were to pursue a business route designation, WSDOT would need a Resolution from
Council; and said WSDOT would also need an agreement if we were to have signage at the Country Vista
interchange, adding that she suggests not pursuing that option as that interchange is likely to be removed
in the future, and said she feels Barker would be a more logical option. Concerning Way�nding signs,
Ms. Note explained that there is a regional effort underway for wayfinding signs, and that Spokane
County has submitted a grant application in that regard; she said our City would be expected to be
involved; that she feels funding is likely, and this would be a good start for us as we pursue wayfinding
signage. Council discussion included mention of using our City's logo; having a visitor center on private
property and whether it would need to be staffed (Ms. Note said she would research that issue); and the
idea of using the Spokane Valley Mall as a visitor center. City Manager Jackson said he recommends
waiting to see if the grant is successful before moving forward and Council raised no objection to that
idea. Mr.Jackson also mentioned he is hopeful that a signage plan will be in place next year with funding
included in the 2014 budget.
6. Snow Removal Plan—Eric Guth
Public Works Director Guth gave some general information about the snow and ice operations, including
equipment and crew needed, and also explained the snow removal plan and outlined the priorities for
plowing. There was brief discussion about not plowing in driveways, where to place berms, having
sidewalks cleared as soon as possible, including the sidewalks in front of City Hall; GIS tracking
equipment and its benefits; a county-wide 2-1-1 system and the idea of encouraging the lawn care
businesses to assist in clearing sidewalks for those who can't and mention that we send out e-mails,
media releases, and post weather-related conditions on the City's website as needed.
7. Ten-Year Anniversar�pdate—Carolbelle Branch
After Public Information Officer Branch went through her PowerPoint presentation explaining the
planning process for the City's Ten-Year Anniversary, Deputy Mayor Schimmels suggested including the
Tree Lighting Ceremony as part of the City's celebration, and Ms. Branch indicated she has some
Council Study Session Minutes 10-30-12 Page 2 of 3
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
contacts who can give her information in that regard. Mayor Towey suggested having a slogan or theme
to go with the tenth-year anniversary, and Mr. Jackson suggested instead of forming a committee just for
that purpose, to take that task to the current committee. Councilmember Grafos suggested having signs
placed on specific land to announce such things as "Future Site of City Library/Park" and perhaps one as
well on the future urban trail. Councilmember Hafner suggested broadcasting our past accomplishments;
and Councilmember Wick suggested tying our anniversary into a 4"'of July celebration. Mr. Jackson said
some of those suggestions will require budget research.
8. Advance A�enda—Mavor ToweX
Mayor Towey said there was some discussion last week about either not meeting November 6 or having a
short meeting, and after brief discussion, it was determined that the November 6 meeting will be
cancelled. The subject of manufactured homes was brought up and it was again agreed not to place this
on the Comprehensive Plan Docket for 2013, but that in doing so, it would not preclude staff and Council
from conducting discussions on the topic, which is tentatively scheduled for an early March, 2013 council
meeting.
9. The followin i� tems, (a) University Road Overpass Study; (b) Finance Monthly Report; (c) Admin
Quarterly Report; and (d) Parks & Recreation Quarterly Reports, were for information only and were not
discussed or reported.
10. Council Check-In—Mayor Towe� There were no comments from Council.
ll. City Mana�er Comments—Mike Jackson
Mr. Jackson reported that staff has been meeting and had good exchanges with representatives from
SCRAPS as they work on a draft agreement he also noted that staff has signed a contract with MDI to
work on marketing and advertising for the remainder of the year and the hope is to have some ads out this
year. Mr. Jackson also commended staff and Council for working on and adopting the budget for 2013;
and said that the City is in outstanding financial condition.
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting
adjourned at 8:25 p.m.
ATTEST: Thomas E. Towey, Mayor
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
Council Study Session Minutes 10-30-12 Page 3 of 3
Approved by Council:
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: November 13, 2012 Department Director Approval: ❑
Check all that apply: � consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Extension for Economic Development Ad Hoc Committee Report Deadline
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: April 24, 2012, a motion was passed unanimously to
confirm certain Mayoral appointments to the Economic Development Ad Hoc Committee, with
an approximate time frame of four months from the date of appointment, for the committee to
complete its work.
At the July 31, 2012 Council meeting, a motion was passed unanimously to extend the
timeframe of the Economic Development Ad Hoc Committee's work to the end of November or
sooner, if the committee feels they have satisfied their directive.
There was Council consensus at the October 2, 2012 Council meeting to extend the deadline
for the report, to December 4, 2012, and a motion to that affect was placed on that Council's
Consent agenda, which passed unanimously.
Mayor Towey will not be in attendance at the December 4 council meeting, and In order to have
all councilmembers present for the final report, Committee Chair Ben Wick seeks to extend the
deadline to December 11, 2012.
BACKGROUND:
OPTIONS: Approve as part of the Consent Agenda, or remove this from the Consent Agenda
and discuss separately.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move to extend the timeframe of the Economic
Development Ad Hoc Committee to December 11, 2012.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: none
STAFF/COUNCIL CONTACT: Councilmember Ben Wick
ATTACHMENTS: n/a
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: November 13, 2012 Department Director Approval: �
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business �new business ❑ public hearing
❑information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First Reading Proposed Ordinance 12-028, Multi-Family Regulations
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A.106; SVMC 17.80.150 and 19.30.040
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None
BACKGROUND: In the past, the City has processed some contentious,privately initiated, site-specific
map amendments through the Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment process. As a result, staff has
researched changes to the SVMC to mitigate the impacts of multi-family development when it is adjacent
to single-family development.
The proposed city initiated text amendment would modify SVMC 19.40.070, 19.40.080, 19.60.070 and
19.60.080 to include standards for multi-family development when it is adjacent to single-family
development.
On October ll,2012, the Planning Commission voted 6-0 to advance the Findings and Recommendations
to the City Council.
On October 23,2012, staffprovided an administrative report to City Council. Council consensus was to
move the Planning Commission's recommendation to a First Ordinance Reading.
OPTIONS: Proceed as proposed, or as modified; or direct staff further.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Move to advance ordinance 12-028 to a second reading at the December
ll, 2012 Council meeting.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:None
STAFF CONTACT: Mike Basinger, AICP, Senior Planner
ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance 12-028,Planning Commission Draft Minutes,PowerPoint Presentation
DRAFT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 12-028
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON AMENDING SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS
19.40.070, 19.40.080, 19.60.070 AND 19.60.080 TO INCLUDE STANDARDS FOR
MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT WHEN IT IS ADJACENT TO SINGLE-FAMILY
DEVELOPMENT,AND OTHER MATTERS RELATED THERETO.
WHEREAS, on September 25, 2007, the City of Spokane Valley (City) adopted Spokane Valley
Municipal Code (SVMC) Title 19,pursuant to Ordinance 07-015; and
WHEREAS, on October 28, 2007, SVMC Title 19 became effective; and
WHEREAS, such regulations are authorized by RCW 36.70A; and
WHEREAS, the amendments set forth below are consistent with the goals and policies of the City's
Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, on September 5, 2012, the Washington State Department of Commerce was notified
pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, providing an expedited 14-day notice of intent to adopt amendments to the
Spokane Valley Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, on September 13,2012, the Planning Commission held a study session; and
WHEREAS, on September 21, 2012 and September 28, 2012, notice of the Planning Commission
public hearing was published in the Valley News Herald; and
WHEREAS, SVMC 19.40.070, 19.40.080, 19.60.070 and 19.60.080, as amended, bear a substantial
relation to the public health, safety and welfare and protection of the environment and
WHEREAS, on October 11, 2012, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, received evidence,
information, public testimony, and a staff report with a recommendation followed by deliberations and
provided a recommendation; and
WHEREAS, on October 23, 2012, City Council reviewed the proposed amendments at a study session;
and
WHEREAS, on November 8, 2012, the Planning Commission approved the findings and
recommendations; and
WHEREAS, on November 13, 2012, City Council considered a first ordinance reading to adopt the
proposed amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley do ordain as follows:
Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend Spokane Valley Municipal Code
sections 19.40.070, 19.40.080, 19.60.070 and 19.60.080.
Section 2. Findin�s. The City Council acknowledges that the Planning Commission conducted
appropriate investigation and study, held a public hearing on the application and recommends approval of the
amendment. The City Council hereby adopts the findings of the Planning Commission, specifically that
Ordinance 12-028 Page 1 of 3
DRAFT
Growth Mana�ement Act Policies
1. The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) provides that each city shall
adopt a comprehensive land use plan and development regulations that are consistent
with and implement the comprehensive plan.
Countywide Plannin�Policies
2. The Countywide Planning Policies (CWPP) are based on principles developed through
a lengthy citizen participation process. One of the guiding principles coming out of
that process was the importance of protecting neighborhood character. For most
citizens, neighborhood character is one of the primary ingredients in their perceived
quality of life. It is the intent of the CWPP to maintain neighborhood character and
prevent neighborhoods from suffering the negative effects of growth.
Ci .t�pokane Valley Goals and Policies
3. The City of Spokane Valley has adopted goals and policies consistent with the GMA
and adopted CWPP.
a. Goal LUG-1: Preserve and protect the character of Spokane Valley's residential
neighborhoods.
b. Policy LUP-11: Maintain and protect the character of e�sting and future
residential neighborhoods through the development and enforcement of the City's
land use regulations and joint planning.
c. Policy LUP-12: Protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent non-residential
uses and/or higher intensity uses through the development and enforcement of the
City's land use regulations and j oint planning.
d. Policy LUP-13: Review and revise as necessary, existing land use regulations to
provide for innovation and fle�bility in the design of new residential
developments, accessory dwelling units and in-fill development.
e. Policy LUP-2.4: Residential development should be designed to provide privacy
and common open space. Open space areas shall be proportionate to the size of
the residential development.
£ Policy HP-13: Establish development regulations and incentives for greater
diversity of housing types, costs and designs, that may include bonus incentives,
clustering, and transfer of development rights.
Section 3. Spokane Valley Municipal Code sections 19.40.070, 19.40.080, 19.60.070 and
19.60.080 are amended to include the following requirements to the Supplemental Permitted Use Regulations:
Multi-familv adjacent to Sin�le-Familv Residential uses or zoning
a. A relational hei�ht limit to sin�le residential uses or aone is established (see Fi u� re 1�
i. Where new multi-family development is abuttin� an adjacent parcel with a sin�le-famil.r�
or zone, the hei�ht of the new multi-family development mav not increase by more than 45
de�rees when measured from the an�le that ori�inates at 25 feet above the a�licable
pro�ertv line (creatin� a 1 to 1 hei�ht-to-setback ratio) to the abuttin� sin�le-familv use or
zone.
b. The minimum setback from a sin�le-family use or zone shall be 10 feet from�ro�e , line.
Ordinance 12-028 Page 2 of 3
DRAFT
Figure 1: Relational Height Limit
I - -
'��'�=':Jh'ER.TI Llfdt ;' I
� �1-?,hd ,4FLa
: r:..-��.i�Jpn.r�,.r ,
l
� ri���ii,i i ��,..� �
� -
_- , . _ . � �
�
� _
`�
I
�I
I
I
; �:� � �
Section 4. All other provisions of Spokane Valley Municipal Code Title 19 not specifically
referenced herein shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 5. Severabilitv. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held
to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality
shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this
Ordinance.
Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect �ve days after
publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as
provided by law.
Passed by the City Council this day of December,2012.
ATTEST:
Mayor, Thomas E. Towey
City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge
Approved as to Form:
Office of the City Attorney
Date of Publication:
Effective Date:
Ordinance 12-028 Page 3 of 3
Spokane Valley Planning Commission
DRAFT Minutes
Council Chambers — City Hall, 11707 E. Sprague Ave.
October 11, 2012
L CALL TO ORDER
Chair Bates called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
IL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance
IIL ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONERS Present Absent CITY STAFF
Bill Bates -Chair � � Scott Kuhta,Planning Manager
John G. Carroll � �— Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney
Rustin Hall � �— Lori Barlow, Senior Planner
Rod Higgins � � Mike Basinger, Senior Planner
Steven Neill � �
Fred Beaulac � �—
Joe Stoy—Vice Chair � � Deanna Grif�th, Secretary
The Chair hearing no objection declared Mr. Stoy's absence was excused.
IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Commissioner Higgins made a motion to approve the October 1l, 2012 agenda as presented.
This motion was passed unanimously.
V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner Neill made a motion to approve the September 27, 2012 minutes as presented.
This motion was passed unanimously.
VL PUBLIC COMMENT
There was no public comment.
VIL COMMISSION REPORTS
Commissioners Bates and Higgins reported they had attended a Planning Short Course offered
by the Dept. of Commerce October 5, 2012.
Planning Commission Minutes 10-ll-12 Page 1 of 8
VIIL ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
Planning Manager Kuhta reported the advanced agenda would be updated by the next meeting.
He also reported during next meeting Deputy City Attorney Erik Lamb would be conducting a
short training regarding Planning Commission members using City email addresses.
IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS
A. Unfinished Business: Deliberations Shoreline Master Program, Shoreline
Environment Designations.
Sr. Planner Barlow recapped the events to date following the public hearing held
September 27, 2012. Ms. Barlow stated during the public hearing the Commission had
received verbal and written testimony and requested staff ask the City's outside legal
counsel to review it and comment on it. Ms. Barlow reported Mr. Kisielius reviewed the
comments and generally felt the City had addressed all of the points which had been raised
by Futurewise and their partners. However, staff did feel there were two changes which
could be made based on the comments received.
In the introduction the suggested change would be to add the words, "and assure".
Futurewise requested to change the reference to `no net loss' from a goal to a requirement.
Mr. Kisielius felt the reference should be consistent with the WAC.
New Text: This is necessary so that the Citv °'""'°';"° ''°T,°'"""'°"+will reasonably
protect existing uses and shoreline character and assure
"No Net Loss" of shoreline ecological functions �° ���.
Ms. Barlow stated the other change requested was to include all of the state required
policies in the aquatic environment section of the report. Staff reviewed the request,
conferred with Mr. Kisielius. Mr. Kisielius has recommended the Planning Commission
include any extra general policies to cover situations the City did not anticipate. In the
aquatic environment this would affect a few structures, primarily docks, piers, bridges,
utility corridors.
Ms. Barlow reminded the Commission during the public hearing she had included two
maps for discussion. The first map had three designations reflected the original draft. The
second map, identified as the Alternate Draft Environment Designation Map, had the staff
recommendations with the suggested expanded environmental designations, Shoreline
Residential — Upland, Shoreline Residential — Waterfront, Urban Conservancy, Urban
Conservancy—High Qualiry, and Aquatic, and the defined Ordinary High Water Mark near
Coyote Rock.
The Commissioners thanked Sr. Planner Barlow for her work and diligence and then
discussed a point of order regarding information and the handling the motion on the floor.
The Commissioners agreed the Alternative Map and the draft of the Environment
Designations presented with the two minor changes was what they wanted moved forward.
Commissioner Carroll commented he was concerned the Urban Conservancy — High
Qualiry would be confusing for people and felt it should be changed to Natural. However,
he would go along with the Commission vote.
The original motion was "to accept the Shoreline Designations as proposed". T�ote is 0 in
favor, 6 against, the motion fails.
Planning Commission Minutes 10-ll-12 Page 2 of 8
Commissioner Beaulac moved to recommend approval to the City Council of the Draft
Environment Designations and the draft Alternative Designation map as presented. The
vote on this motion was unanimous in favor, the motion passes.
B. New Business:
1. Public hearing on CTA-03-12 proposed amendment regarding setbacks for
multifamily development when adjacent to single family development.
Chair Bates declared the public hearing opened at 6:38 p.m. Commissioner Carroll
read the rules for a public hearing.
Sr. Planner Mike Basinger recapped for the Commissioners CTA-03-12, a City initiated
code text amendment regarding the setbacks for multifamily development when it is
adjacent to single family residential development. Mr. Basinger stated concerns in the
past have been of the bulk and scale of multifamily development when it has been
adjacent to single family development. As a result council asked staff to look into
possible mitigation options. Commissioners, at the study session, asked to have notice
sent to the development communiry. Staff did send a notice to the Spokane Home
Builders Association, who in turn sent the message to membership. Mr. Basinger said
he did receive some information from one developer and would share it with the
Commission in his presentation. The proposed amendment would set a 1:1 relational
height setback Mr. Basinger explained it would be predictable for development and
easy for staff to administer. However, a concern had been raised that it could create a
hardship for some smaller properties to develop.
Mr. Basinger then explained the new proposal which would allow a 35 foot building
height at the 10 foot minimum setback The setbacks would increase from there. A 50
foot tall building would have be set back 25 feet. There were no further questions or
discussion. The Chair called for anyone from the public to testify.
Dennis Crapo, 2602 N Sullivan Rd.: Mr. Crapo stated he was a developer and he was
not opposed to the change. Mr. Crapo also stated he did not feel there was anything
wrong with the current regulations and that City struggled to apply the standards
consistently. Mr. Cra�o recapped his request for a Comprehensive Plan amendment on
property located on 4t near Sullivan. When he made his request for the Comprehensive
Plan amendment the Shelley Lake Homeowners became upset. The Shelley Lake
Home Owners Association (HOA) gathered together and came to the Commission and
to the Council and complained, therefore causing the creation of a developer agreement
in the Municipal Code in order to mitigate the impacts. Mr. Crapo stated it delayed his
project, did not feel it was fair when he had tried to accommodate reasonable
development with the neighbors, cost him money in attorney fees and the standards at
the time were adequate. Mr. Crapo then reminded the Commission during the last
year's Comprehensive Plan amendment process Mr. Arger came in for a
Comprehensive Plan amendment, very similar to his, and citizens became upset, but
they are not as organized as the Shelly Lake HOA and Mr. Arger was not required to
have a developer agreement. Mr. Crapo stated he felt the rules should apply to
everyone fairly or the City would continue to get resistance against development and
there would be no certainty for developers. Mr. Crapo said whether the City stayed
with the current rules, or had new rules, citizens were going to complain when they did
Planning Commission Minutes 10-ll-12 Page 3 of 8
not like new development next to them, and a developer will never know with certainty
what rules he will be using if the rules are allowed to change every time development is
met with resistance. Mr. Crapo said he felt staff had done a good job preparing a
reasonable compromise. Mr. Crapo said when a developer buys property for high
density development they pay more for it, they expect be able to get more out it.
When asked by a Commissioner, Mr. Crapo said of the two options he would prefer the
second one. It would allow a 35-foot building at a 10-foot setback He said, of course
he would prefer not to change the regulation at all. He also said he did not feel it would
change the resistance in the community. This option would allow latitude to the builder
and the developer. Mr. Crapo again, stated, regardless of the change, he still would like
to see the standards applied evenly and fairly to everyone and predictability in the
regulations is key to developers.
Chair Bates closed the public hearing at 6:56 p.m. Commissioner Neill then requested
to ask Mr. Crapo a question. Commissioner Carroll moved to reopen the public
hearing. This motion was seconded and the vote was unanimously passed. The public
hearing was reopened at 6:56 p.m.
Mr. Crapo returned to the podium. Commissioner Neill asked if there could be a third
option for smaller parcels which would be difficult to develop under the new standard.
Mr. Crapo responded that he felt there is nothing wrong with current standard. The
third option would be current regulations. Mr. Crapo said, again, he feels the problem
is that regardless the standards single family homeowners are not going to be happy
when multifamily development happens next to them. Mr. Crapo said he would like to
be cooperative with staff, and will go along with which ever option is proposed. When
asked if he had spoken with other developers regarding the proposal, he indicated he
had. When asked about those responses he had received from them Mr. Crapo stated he
would not speak for any other developers. Mr. Crapo said after discussion he hoped the
Commission would look at the proposal from different angles.
Commissioner Bates asked Mr. Basinger if the Developer Agreements were in the
Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Basinger answered yes there are policies in the
Comprehensive Plan which support it, but the Municipal Code is where the guidance
for the developer agreements are located. Mr. Basinger also said he had mentioned at
the study session this proposal (15 foot option) would not work for all properties,
especially the smaller ones. The purpose of the proposal is to add some confidence in
our regulations which would mitigate the impacts of multifamily development when it
is adjacent to single family development. He reminded the Commission the City would
like to try and not enter into developer agreements. Staff would support either option.
Both proposals have a relational setback, but Option 2 would allow smaller properties
to develop a little easier.
Commissioner Hall stated the point Mr. Crapo is making is this type of regulation
would make developing more predictable. Mr. Hall asked staff's opinion if this change
would make developing more predictable? Would it resolve the problem? Mr.
Basinger replied when in conjunction with Comprehensive Plan amendments it should
do that.
Planning Commission Minutes 10-ll-12 Page 4 of 8
Commissioner Higgins stated this change also makes the City's position, in subsequent
Comprehensive Plan hearings, defensible. Mr. Higgins pointed out dependability is
gone with developer agreements. He said if this change helps avoid that, he supports it.
Chair Bates closed the public hearing at 7:15 p.m.
Commissioner Carroll asked Commissioner Hall if, as an architect, the proposals have
any issues he can see. Mr. Hall stated he does not have a problem with either option.
Commissioner Hall moved to recommend approval of CTA-03-12, clarify relational
setback as modified to 25 foot formula to the City Council.
Commissioner Neill stated he supported this amendment. He said he believed it would
help with smaller properties and with the City's responsibiliry to the citizens. He said
he thought it would help to alleviate some of the flashback to some of the issues the
City has had regarding development in the past. He felt it had good balance.
Commissioner Carroll shared he was part of the Planning Commission when Mr.
Crapo's Comprehensive Plan was in submitted for approval Mr. Carroll said he
thought the Commission did not have the tools to help mitigate the issues. He said he
felt this would proposal was a more even way to deal with these issues.
Commissioner Hall said it would be nice if people would realize when they buy
property next to an open space it is possible development will be coming eventually,
but they don't. However, he felt the amendment was a good compromise.
Commissioner Higgins thanked Mr. Crapo for his comments, finding them very
educational. Commissioner Bates also thanked Mr. Crapo. Commissioner Bates
continued saying he felt this would not solve all of the City's problems. We need the
tools to make good decisions. We still have a ways to ga Mr. Bates did not want to
take anything away from the current proposal; he felt it was a good regulation change.
Mr. Bates stated he felt the Ciry needed to improve in the communications area. He
said he felt the communication, when it came to Comprehensive Plan amendments,
between the City, developers and the neighborhoods needs to be improved in order to
try and mitigate the problems we are continually dealing with. Mr. Bates stated he
intended to support the proposed
The vote on the motion was 6 in favor, the motion passed unanimously.
Commission took a break at 7:30 and returned at 7:40
2. Study session Shoreline Master Program—Restoration Plan.
Sr. Planner Lori Barlow made a presentation regarding the Shoreline Master Program
Restoration Plan. Ms. Barlow stated that the SMP Restoration Plan provides a
framework for restoration based on the inventory and characterization report, identifies
potential sites and opportunities for restoration and protection and provides guidance
for carrying out restoration in a comprehensive manner.
Ms. Barlow stated the Restoration Plan is a required element of the WAC. Jurisdictions
which have impaired shorelines must prepare a plan. Based on the City's inventory we
know we have impaired sites. Some examples are bank erosion, degraded habitat with
Planning Commission Minutes 10-ll-12 Page 5 of 8
large concentrations of noxious weeds, cleared and disturbed areas, eroding gully
slopes, erosion from heavy foot traffic, DOE metals clean-up sites.
Ms. Barlow said the WAC identifies items the Restoration Plan must address, which
include the following.
Identify degraded areas, impaired functions and sites with potential for ecological
restoration.
Establish overall goals and priorities for restoration of degraded areas and
impaired ecological functions.
Identify existing and ongoing projects and programs.
Identify additional projects and programs to meet restoration goals.
Identify timelines and benchmarks for implementing restoration projects and
programs and achieving local restoration goals.
Provide for mechanisms or strategies
Ms. Barlow then went on to explain each of the elements of the Plan.
Section 1 —Introduction: It is an overview of the requirements and how the plan is intended
to work in the SMP update process. It provides the City context for the plan which includes
collaborative planning, regulation, preservation of high quality shoreline areas, and
aiding community efforts to restore degraded portions of the City's shorelines. The
City and restoration partners are intended to work together on securing funding to
implement the plan and attain the timelines and benchmarks in the plan as funding
allows. In this section there is also an overview of the requirements, and how the plan is
intended to work.
Section 2 Restoration Goals and Su�ortin� Policies: This section identifies the
restoration goals and policies and refers back to the goals and policies in the overall
SMP. It summarizes degraded shoreline areas and functions, prioritizes restoration
opportunities, prioritizes restoration possibilities with the greatest benefit, establishes
a implementation strategy, helps to identify opportunities which contribute towards
shoreline restoration efforts, and monitor restoration activities.
Section 3, Existing and On-_goin_g Projects and Pro_rg ams: Summarizes existing factors
limiting the functionality of the shoreline ecosystem. Limiting Factors are things
which impair the ecosystem processes and limit the capacity of the functions. They
are environmental variables whose presence, absence or abundance restricts the
conditions. They could be things present like noxious weeds, or adding shade trees. This
section identifies the limiting factors and causes and highlights e�sting and ongoing projects
and programs that may address those issues. Last, it identifies additional projects and
programs needed to achieve shoreline restoration goals. It addresses where the gaps are and
what can the City do about them. For example, even though we know there is a program to
clean up the toxic metals sites, often the projects do not include vegetation. This will allow
us to�gure out where the gaps are and how we fill them.
Section 4 Prioritization Methodolo�v: This strategy was put in place to address how
to prioritize projects for restoration when it became possible to complete them. The
scoring factors are: Ease of property acquisition, shade benefit, scale of restoration
activity, role within the context of surrounding habitat matrix and consistency with
other SMP goals.
Planning Commission Minutes 10-ll-12 Page 6 of 8
Section 5 Restoration O�ortunities: There are two types of restoration opportunities.
One is programmatic opportunities (which are not site specific) such as public
education programs, shoreline regulations and enforcement, shoreline maintenance,
conservation futures and stormwater standards. The second opportunity is site
specific opportunities: Where the site could be restored to a properly functioning
condition. The opportunities are voluntary. Neither of the opportunities are a
requirement. The city is not obligated to fund any of the restoration opportunities.
However, the city is required to proactively identify restoration partners and pursue
funding opportunities — this requires staff involvement. Ms. Barlow gave an
example of how the program could work The City is currently working with State
Parks Dept. to stabilize the river bank east of Flora Road. The City would look at
what is impaired based on the plan and then look at what is possible in some of the
conceptual approaches. The Ciry has partnered with the State and has designed the
repair project for the state to implement.
Section 6 Im�lementation Plan: This section address an implementation plan which
identifies partners,potential funding sources, timelines and benchmarks. This section
has a list of organizations who have in the past demonstrated an interest in protecting
the City's shorelines. There is also a list of possible funding sources which are
possible if a project should become available for restoration. Timeline and
benchmarks for implementing restoration plan are also in this section.
Section 7 Monitoring, Maintenance and Ada�tive Mana_eg ment: The purpose of this
section is to provide steps for monitoring the successful implementation of this plan
and to have a process for monitoring site specific projects. This section also identifies
an alternative strategy if restoration benchmarks are not met.
Ms. Barlow said the public hearing for the Restoration Plan is scheduled for October
25� 2012. She told the Commissioners the next elements of the SMP to come before
them would be the Public Access Plan, then the regulations.
Commissioner Beaulac asked how successful could a restoration plan be in an urban
jurisdiction, especially when surrounding jurisdictions do not take care of their issues as
the City is doing. Ms. Barlow responded each jurisdiction in the state of Washington
who have shorelines of the state are required to have a restoration plan, and each of the
other jurisdictions are sharing a piece of the river. The City can only assume they are
sharing similar issues. Mr. Kuhta also indicated the City's situation provides more
opportunity for restoration because most of the shoreline along the river is publically
owned land, so partnership is easier. Private groups also help out, for instance there is a
group who just helped around the Mirabeau Park area, helping to define foot paths and
cleaning up the area. Ms. Barlow and Mr. Kuhta named examples of other cities where
shoreline restoration has occurred in highly industrialized, urban areas.
Mr. John Patrouch, with URS Corporation shared with the Commission the City has
good shoreline here, but it still needs to track no net loss of ecological functions. Mr.
Patrouch said the base line is the inventory, if nothing changed the simple wear and tear
along the trail would require restoration efforts. Commissioner Beaulac asked if the
City can't get the funding, would we would revert to public education. Mr. Patrouch
Planning Commission Minutes 10-ll-12 Page 7 of 8
responded the City would do the site specific restoration at same time as programmatic
opportunities. Both efforts would be done at the same time.
Commissioner Neill asked if a benchmark were approaching and the City was not going
to achieve it would it put the city in a position to have to fund a shoreline project over
another dedicated project, like street preservation. Ms. Barlow said no, the city would
not be required to fund shoreline restoration. She further commented the biologist,
Noah Herlocker, who wrote the Ciry's restoration plan, has been recognized as having
written some of the best restoration plans around the state. The Plan as written does not
obligate funds above and beyond another priority project. The restoration plan will not
force the city to hire someone to keep track of the shoreline restoration projects. Staff
will keep track and document projects and incorporate when possible restoration
concepts identified in the plan.
Commissioner Hall asked if staff could foresee any possible conflicts in potential
partners. Staff responded there could be some — every group has an agenda and there
could be a conflict, in that case they may not be a good partner for that particular
project. However,with most potential partners there are commonalities.
Staff discussed how projects would come into the City and be reviewed to determine if
it requires an environmental review and if these would be a potential for restoration in
the project and parmering possibilities.
X. GOOD OF THE ORDER
Commissioners Carroll and Higgins will not be able to attend the October 25, 2012 meeting.
XL ADJOURNMENT
The being no other business the meeting was adjourned at 8:37 p.m.
Bill Bates, Chairperson
Deanna Griffith, PC Secretary
Date signed
Planning Commission Minutes 10-ll-12 Page 8 of 8
i:r-v i.:,�,;,,;_...�.. :' b..�.. .
r�,« ��. Department of Community Development _ �:
S'pakane ._ , . . _ _ :
, `�
��'��1��� : . Planning Division �
_ y" �'°`, R�_ _ .
Multifamil Develo ment
Y p
Standards
November 13, 2012
i:r-v i.:,�,;,,;_...�.. :' b..�.. .
r�,« ��. Department of Community Development _ �:
S'pakane ._ , . . _ _ :
, `�
��'��1��� : . Planning Division �
_ y" �'°`, R�_ _ .
Relational S etback 2 5 ' Pro ert Line
p Y
� �
,
� -,
�1 F������,��t.-�r, i �� :� ,�: -
� F'La.f'J �d�C!�. ',.
� k�Crl1N�:FAR1' �f
�
iH�i�l�t Lii�i-�it. � �_;�+�
�
�
S�i[;�c�r.la:—II�._:i,�17�—�'��' I
�
I _A�C
�
I
�G`I
. �
__. �
I
I
1
�IY1C��c=; f��lll"���., f�
U S F' I j I'� :4�f'..=. ..
� fTi:fi
�C�.��C7CG.
i:r-v i.:,�,;,,;_...�.. :' b..�.. .
r�,« ��. Department of Community Development _ �:
S'pakane ._ , . . _ _ :
, `�
��'��1��� : . Planning Division �
_ y" �'°`, R�_ _ .
et ac F ormu a
Example 1 : Setback = Height — 25 feet
Setback = 50 feet — 25 feet
Setback = 25 feet
Example 2 : Setback = Height — 25 feet
Setback = 3 S feet — 25 feet
Setback = 10 feet
i:r-v i.:,�,;,,;_...�.. :' b..�.. .
r�,« ��. Department of Community Development _ �:
S'pakane ._ , . . _ _ :
, `�
��'��1��� : . Planning Division �
_ y" �'°`, R�_ _ .
uestlons
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: November 13, 2012 Department Director Approval: �
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business � new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First reading - Ordinance 12-029 adopting regulation of commercial
vehicles
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 9.05.010; WAC 308-330-462; RCW 46.61.570; RCW
46.44.080.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: At the May 29, 2012 City Council meeting, Council
received an administrative report on potentially restricting semi-truck parking in residential
zones, and at the June 26, 2012 Council meeting, received a follow up administrative report
from the perspective of the professional trucking community; September 4, 2012 administrative
report; October 23, 2012 administrative report.
BACKGROUND: At the direction of Council, staff has been working on providing potential code
options for regulating commercial truck traffic in residential neighborhoods. Additionally, staff
has attempted to aggregate regulations regarding similar topics into one place, a new chapter of
the City Code.
Since staff last presented this draft on October 23, several revisions have been made. These
changes were made to make the code provisions more consistent with the corresponding
County Code section so we get consistency of rulings from the local judges. Senior Traffic
Engineer Inga Note believes the current draft you have before you will be effective in controlling
commercial trucks in residential areas.
OPTIONS: (a) move to a second reading (b) request that staff make additional changes to the
draft Code provisions; or (c) do nothing.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move that we advance Ordinance 12-029 relating to
commercial truck regulations to a second reading.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None anticipated.
STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS:
(1) Proposed Ordinance 12-029 relating to commercial truck traffic issues
(2) Map showing existing "posted no trucks" signs posted by Spokane County
(3) Picture of a "No Trucks" sign and "Local Deliveries Only" sign from Knox Avenue
1
DRAFT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 12-029
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, ADOPTING CHAPTER 9.30 OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO MISCELLANEOUS VEHICLE REGULATIONS;
AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO.
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley previously adopted several provisions relating to vehicle
regulations on the rights-of-way in the City, which were dispersed within the Spokane Valley Municipal
Code (SVMC); and
WHEREAS, the City has determined that it is appropriate to protect the life, health, and safety of
its citizens to adopt additional vehicle regulations regarding idling of commercial vehicles in residentially
zoned areas, operation of refrigeration units associated with commercial truck trailers, and operation of
commercial trucks in excess of 10,000 pounds on residential roads. Such regulations are within the police
power granted to cities by Article XI, Section ll of the Washington state Constitution; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to aggregate the existing vehicle regulations along with the new
regulations in one chapter of the SVMC for ease of use by the public.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Washington ordains as
follows:
Section 1. Adoptin� Spokane Valley Municipal Code 930.010 Re�ardin� Purpose and Authority.
Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 930.010 is hereby adopted as follows:
SVMC 930.010 -Purpose and authority.
The purpose of this chapter is to regulate the kinds and classes of traffic, parking, and
vehicular noise on certain streets within the City. This regulation is undertaken in order
to promote the efficient movement of vehicles and conduct of commerce, while
preserving the integrity of residential zones. The provisions of this chapter are adopted
under the authority granted by RCW 46.44.080 and SVMC 9.05.040, and are to promote
the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the City.
Section 2. Adopt��n� Spokane Valley Municipal Code 9.30.020 Re�ardin� Definitions. Spokane Valley
Municipal Code section 9.30.020 is hereby adopted as follows:
SVMC 930.020 -De�nitions.
Terms used within this chapter are defined as follows:
"Commercial Vehicle" means that term as defined in RCW 46.04.140, as now or
hereafter amended.
"Local Delivery" means providing local or neighborhood deliveries or services to points
upon such streets or roads.
"Residential area" means the following zoning districts, as delineated on the official
aoning map of the City:
Ordinance 12-029 Adopting SVMC 9.30-Miscellaneous Vehicle Regulations P1ge 1 Of 4
DRAFT
R-1 Single-Family Residential Estate District.
R-2 Single-Family Residential Suburban District.
R-3 Single-Family Residential District.
R-4 Single-Family Residential Urban District.
MF-1 Multifamily Medium Density Residential District.
MF-2 Multifamily High Density Residential District.
"Residential Street"means any street or alleyway within the City which is not designated
on the City's arterial road map.
"Trailer" means that term as defined in RCW 46.04.620, as now adopted or hereafter
amended.
"Vehicle" means that term as defined in RCW 46.04.670, as now adopted or hereafter
amended.
Section 3. Adoptin� Spokane Valley Municipal Code 930.030 Re�ardin� "No Trucks" Si�ns. Spokane
Valley Municipal Code section 930.030 is hereby adopted as follows:
SVMC 930.030—"No Trucks" Signs.
A. Any street upon which a "No Trucks" sign is posted shall be permanently
closed to all commercial vehicle travel having a gross licensed weight of 10,000
pounds or more, except for the purpose of providing local or neighborhood
deliveries or services to points between the posted signs. The City may, for
clarification purposes, also post optional "Local Delivery Only" signs in
conjunction with "No Truck" signs.
B. The following vehicles are exempt from the provisions of SVMC 930.030:
l. All vehicles owned, contracted, or operated by governmental agencies.
2. Emergency vehicles and solid waste disposal vehicles.
3. Electrical, water, telephone, and natural gas utility providers responding
for installations, maintenance, or incident repairs.
4. Vehicles actively used for the purpose of delivering materials to be
used in the actual and bona fide repair, alteration, remodeling, or
construction of any building or structure upon a residential street, for
which a building permit has previously been obtained.
5. Trailers currently used at a specific location within a residential zone
for the purpose of assisting or providing services such as construction,
carpentry, plumbing, or landscaping to a residence or location upon a
residential street.
6. Recreational vehicles including motor homes, campers, and travel
trailers.
7. Vehicles belonging to, or operated by, persons permanently residing
within the Ciry limits, as evidenced by the owner's or operator's address
Ordinance 12-029 Adopting SVMC 9.30-Miscellaneous Vehicle Regulations P1ge 2 Of 4
DRAFT
on file with the Washington State Department of Licensing. To qualify
for this exemption, the vehicle must be used for commuting to work at
places located inside or outside of the City limits.
8. Any commercial vehicle belonging to a business located between the
posted"No Truck" signs.
C. The location of signs reading "No Trucks" shall be established through
adoption of a master "No Truck" sign schedule, which shall be adopted and may
be amended from time-to-time by separate resolution. Any such alteration shall
be made on the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, be reasonable
and safe, and in the interest of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of this
City. "No Trucks" signs shall become effective upon the placement of such signs,
and shall cease at such time as the signs are removed by the City. All signs
placed pursuant to this section shall conform to the Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices for streets and highways for the state of Washington.
Section 4. Adoptin� Spokane Valley Municipal Code 930.040 Re�ardin� Liability of Owner for
Violations. Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 930.040 is hereby adopted as follows:
SVMC 930.040—Liability of Owner for Violations.
If the person operating the commercial vehicle at the time a citation for violation of
SVMC 930.030 is issued is not the owner of the vehicle, then the issuing officer may
also issue a citation for the owner of the vehicle in addition to the operator pursuant to
RCW 46.44.120, as adopted or amended. Further, the operator of the commercial vehicle
is authorized to accept the citation and to execute the Promise to Appear on behalf of the
owner of the vehicle.
Section 5. Adoptin� Spokane Valley Municipal Code 9.30.050 Re�ardin�Excessive Noise From Vehicle
Audio System Prohibited. Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 930.050 is hereby adopted as
follows:
SVMC 9.30.050—Excessive Noise From Vehicle Audio System Prohibited.
The sound from any motor vehicle audio system such as tape players, radio, and compact
disc players at volumes so high as to be audible greater than 50 feet from the vehicle
itself is prohibited.
Section 6. Ado�tin��okane Vallev Munici�al Code 9.30.060 Re�� Idlin� of Commercial
Vehicles Limited in Residentially-Zoned Areas. Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 9.30.060 is
hereby adopted as follows:
SVMC 930.060—Idling of Commercial Vehicles Limited in Residentially-Zoned Areas.
Between the hours of 10:00 p.m. of any day and 7:00 a.m. the next day, no person shall
allow a commercial vehicle to idle in residentially-zoned areas more than 10 consecutive
minutes, or more than 15 minutes total in any single calendar day.
Ordinance 12-029 Adopting SVMC 9.30-Miscellaneous Vehicle Regulations P1ge 3 Of 4
DRAFT
Section 7. Adoptin� Spokane Valley Municipal Code 9.30.070 Re�ardin� Operatin� Refri�eration Units
on Certain Vehicles Limited in Residentially-Zoned Areas. Spokane Valley Municipal Code section
930.070 is hereby adopted as follows:
SVMC 930.070 — Operating Refrigeration Units on Certain Vehicles Limited in Residentially-
Zoned Areas.
Between the hours of 10:00 p.m. of any day and 7:00 a.m. the next day, no person shall
cause or allow a commercial vehicle to idle in residentially-zoned areas more than 10
consecutive minutes, or more than 15 minutes total in any single calendar day.
Section 8. Adoptin� Spokane Valley Municipal Code 9.30.080 Re�ardin�Violations -Penalty. Spokane
Valley Municipal Code section 930.080 is hereby adopted as follows:
SVMC 930.080—Violations—Penalty.
Any person violating or failing to comply with any provisions of this chapter shall
be subject to a Class 1 civil infraction pursuant to Chapter 7.80 RCW.
Section 9. Remainder of SVMC 7.05 Unchan�ed. The remaining provisions of SVMC Chapter 7.05 are
unchanged by this amendment.
Section 10. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held to be
invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall
not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this
Ordinance.
Section 11. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect �ve days after the date of
publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City.
Passed this day of November, 2012.
Mayor, Thomas E. Towey
ATTEST:
City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge
Approved As To Form:
Office of the City Attorney
Date of Publication:
Effective Date:
Ordinance 12-029 Adopting SVMC 9.30-Miscellaneous Vehicle Regulations P1ge 4 Of 4
a - �-
= T� . �'
:�. � _
r , .
� _ , ' 'f �.. � � � ��
• , - _ - = - _ i�
r �
Y-i
I_ 'I
�
i
7
I: i
� . � ' �
� ♦
� � t � -
_ _ ti tl �
'�' � �� - _
.. ��i`
A• � °
�
y �
� ..��. �� - .. n..
� � " � �
�
- � y i �lr
� �� . ' - +i ..
� a
� - � �
� � �
'�p' � . -' 1�
� � � 'y .. _ _ ..
M� .� � ' .� � - � _ ._
- � � � 1. � - - � � -
� � - � r„
_ . - -- ._ . � - � �
.. � - ��i . � - � •
. '
' ..�� � � ,� �. �� a ,_ .
._ ._ - _ - . _ :
�i* -� �'� � .
, _ '� " '�
,
, �_ - -„�
� -
y -
T � �, - � '
E � � _ � � -
� , -
.
��
�
_ .k�� a. ti __
4.
f
i..
� �' .. - . � ... �
� �� �
i �
� - '
_ � ..� " �� � `
_ � � � -.
_ � � �
tl ,� ri
�
� �, � i�
JI- ' .. ;.�. ! * -
�
. ' . � . � . � � .
� �
��� � ..a`y' � _ - - _
� '
� �z fY _
� • � _ �
� .. �S' _. 1� _ f�
�
-. � B
F � �'I'. � �"' �. � .
il � _
' . _ . i i�� - -_
t, _ �. _
� �� � � -
, _ _ .
� �
. ; ,, � ,
9 ,�
� _ � � -
� - .
, ,
� � : �
_ �
�.
�, - . _ _ , ;
, -
_ _ �� _
' iW. � ��.
. . . . < .- < . _. - � �� � � .
z �
� _ .
�
. . - . �:�•. � K 1
f ,
S � � � V
I
ii o � �- �� i� .._ � -_
! - �
� _ � �
_ � � I
� �, + .
. 1 � _ - ' ��'.
� _:. . ,� _ I ' �
� ` T
. � , � :�. . .. �
. _ . . . _ ' _ �� ' _ `r, - - ..�' Y�
�''"_. �� �I _ . � . i
I �
� -
-
- , -
,
� ' _ ..
� ''a a � ' o
, �
, i � �
, � � ,
� . - " ' Y � _ ' ' �
-' _
� �' �
. .. � _ _. _ , - � �..
�_
" _. . �� �• _. w�
. � � .- - �_ . _ -�
, . . _ . _ . . . . . . . _
_ � - � - .- - - � .
�� . _ ' . � �� s � � ,. . � �� , .e .' � _ _ ,.
« . �I * - ,� " '� � r
� � !
.. � � f - - � �
. .
"�"'�" "� � , �� �
� '� �
� � i __ �
�.., �� �{ -
, , � � � . I � � �
_��
'.� - �. . f
F . �, , ., . ' � , . ., .
„ . � � .i - � i .
• T
�
� � � v . _ ,
' .. � �..� - . . -
..
- �� � a � '�
-
, � � i �
.
_�� . . � . � � � �
�� ,: �� �, � � � . -
� �u � � - . - �. = � _ - �
i ..
, �
I ::
,�- - ,.. .:"� ` �_ . k'�, .. " . . . � "J ". �� . �. ,r . .
� ' - 1 r
� '
�
� I
� �!
�.� �, ��- � � _ �
� ��� _
� F . _' , i�.�'.
u
_ i
� �� � .. • ��. �� �lY.T ' k I �.. . n
u �
'_ � :I.. . . � " _ .
_ �
� � , �, �
� �- � ,,
_ _ _ � ,
. � .
,
_
, � _�i , � � . R '��
�- � � ' ' � �� ��
- -- -- -- � - - - _. � .
`. �, . �� . _ ._ _ � -._. _ � t� W � �
3
,r �;� f4 �� � I��'�! - ' - . ;"' .
i_� -- _ -'� 9, �'
� � �' � - � �� � _� ' .y�
1
.� � :. .. . .� _ � . ..
J '!� . �, ... , ��
`j4, i � �� � . -
�."��1! - �' � �.r� d�� -
�'"� ° �� � i .��' � � � _ -
� -'�„ - �..
p _ ,
.
�� y� � � �� . � }
* � � :_ _
' � n . w �'. .-
� � �
h � �� - - - � ' �
. , - �
. _ _ aN..i . �
. �R . . � ¢ - � , -� .
,� ,
� ��W � . ' �I' �•� ._ � . , . �
. - ,._ - —-� � ' .. - ��
�
' - ��
. ' --� . , . . �
_ e = - -�4, - , _
i � .
_ _' ` „ . .i�� � .. � _
_ �,.-c+�AA`� � y d. .
_ . #t i V �i
_
f _
�
_ - -
-- T � .. _ .a . . ` .. ` �
,
A r
�� �
. ' . ' � '� '�. . _
. �
..s... . �. . - ..
r 1
_ .. ... - -.: �- _ .�
. -�_ _ - • . . ��.� ,� �.
` �
�� � �� � _ � .dp_. .. ., � .
.,
► - ' _ _. ,� � -
.�- ''� � i � y 74i � �f. � ■ �� �� ._
. .�,3 . .� __�.� T ' L � : _
'� � . i i , �- - - ,
� Y ,�
,� ._ _ "x? s� � �R, i - � - �
- �' _ �
a - ?F, - M� . , ` -
�". . , ._. 1� -� . _ I
�� '4 • ~ � �� �� � - r}�-� _ ,
� - -
r_�II
� ����s '" � '
� � �- � � � y� - �1�: ' _
�k'. i� _ -� �� �.
. � � ' , a � _ . - -_- - �. - -
� - ... .. . . . , . _ . � . - �
.. �
x ;' � � � �
— . � `I� �• � - � r .
y� ' I
9� • p, I'. 'i , - . L ` t
.. .. - . a. � R . � ! � -.
� . , . s ;� � � - �,��
�r-� � . � i. i � — �
� �
'y' �� Y. + '-� _
� . �
.. '' , � `�. �� .. . �' _ 3 . .. � --
,�i
�
. �� � .
�
t
� � � '
� �
_ �
- ,
i � �
_ i
� !
'I .� .. ` . : , - - .. - i
- �s. ,�s. . . i . . ��� .
e *�. � �� _. : ' �� � ���r _ �.
� �1
�• - � ; # ; , . .
- �� �r -
-� _ _
� �. � � � �
. <
. , — .
� �' `� � � u : • � �� _,� — '-f'� ' � �
`- ! � �� . , _
"" _ v _4,_ .
� ', �
'�,., � �� ��
�� �
� �-' � � , -
� � I
� s, , � _ � — - __ � � � � � -�
� i i X 5 ` N:�. �. �'I - ,� -
�
� y � � r �
� � i
�' ;� .� � r � - - - -
� �
_
� _ �
, , �
�'
� T�. � ,r
,
�
- � --
- - � . —_ - -. �—
,
�
� �, > _ ,,_
� - - • �
,
� � �.�.,,�. 11
- -- � _ � ,� � a i . - �'M . � � 7�M,-���
r� .. . i , .. . -. .
� � �" . . ' -.�. ' . � '
I� y i � ry ;
... . .gk \. � '� � •
.. , i �- � i ' Y. '' .�
. �F , ' � . . ' �
�' ... - - �`� _ .0 _ - - 3
.i
'
_
��'� , . '� .� ..
� � � � _ ,
e � - � . 1 � , ' �
� r
'
�. n
_
_
i
. •
.' .� '.� � 1 .
� ,� _.. -- _ ..
� - ,, � �� � � � s,� �
M
� - x
I - �
_�r
� � �
d�°
.�� 1 - --_. . - -_ ,��� .-�. �
�, � �k - - - - � � ,
. I �
� W =
� �
�
� .. ' I
- # � . � i���.
: 1 = z. µ i� ' . � _ _ �� _- - - � �
�F _
i -
I H � _
�
�_ —�._ , � __
—
':
�i� � ,� _ � � � : . .. -
�
� !I +�
� �. � -�
—
�_ �L:. � 1 , _
� �
�
�� �� �, �i I. �I
� -
' ��� � _- � i 1 � .
� � ,
��T ' . � �� '� � + � .. �
. _ . � +�l '� ya � _
�• � ' � V } � � ,� ; ,
� 1 � _ ��,� �,. .
i � +� +
�
� �'�`. � � � � - I
� � �
.-. . " �e - �F �.'�' � �t -
a� .� . . * � � � - -
K �
!�" �y- . }��3 . � �Ak . . � � , . - � �... �- �.■ � '
. � �
�� _'y_ J _
, �
�, - �' � ,.., '� � � , �� i I
# � . � � _
'�e , _ - _ - - � � ` "
�
.� - � € ,� ��`� � � .
- . _ , - _ , � * � �
� � , �. . �, - � w . _ y �� , # � _ _ � =
- . ,. } _ � � � _
� , _ _ �. e � _. � _
_ . _ �` � - _ - _ � _
� � � � - , �
�
- , �. - . � � , , � . � *
� - � .
� . . �
, � , �
� t - � - M� _ � ,�
. � __
� ' _� _ .��. - . � �' ry .
�
�
l �' �
�� . . . ' _ ._ � � � ' �-: .'� . . ., ..
� � T� . . . �i �
� . f ' � _ i��� .�� � � � n �l' �.�-�' � .�fr� ��' �� !' `�`- � } �� .�
.
,
- - 'al�
� ' J �
�4
' _ -_ -�!
� � � - � � � � � . �'
6
.e� _ �y y�l ' .' � i
z
� � i . . . �' .. - . . � - ' �
a �I � . � � ��- � -�- ' .
4 - z � �
t �
_ y - /
� �
rt s
F � ., . �� .�,K .� �� �
-� - � �� . ��. '� - �� _ .. _ . "`-
� '. �_ . � � -�� � �. .�
_ a �
�* �� � �
-, ,. w. .�, �-,� , _ - - �, ,
��
' � . " `� , - � � t , ri
�
��, ., � r `, , �
� ° 1�W '" 1
e-
. i •
� � _ , ; • �
* .+�� , � .
��
�
- � -' . p-.� ._ . .�J" . r. - ! ��� �. b
a � ' ' �� • �' �
�rw-. _� . . ' . • . . ; , .. � � .. � ' . • - '�
� �
- � �!� . ' - . _
..� :a ' , - � ..� . , _ _ _ . _ �� I
. -m . � � - '. __ i .
� _ . � `��. �, �'�' ' _
� _ � _ �
.
, � _ � �
� ,
�' � ` .� �. �'" . - �'� � '� � �� ;`� r . �* � � ,arr
- �� �'` - - � - � � � i�
� _
f .•� � � ' .. �� , yri
_ � - .
�
i
Y
� ,��yy
,� ' � � " 1� � ., ' '� � �' �
� -. . . . ~ � . . �I � � � y, "
• � � i
.� , • � . � _ -_ . .. .
� � �
_ �- ��i '1� . � � . _
�' � _ � . i , - ' i � .: I � � ..• '
� F�'.�_ "� = M „ ,. , - � �
�� , �� �
,
- , _ .
��
• , n � '�,� � . '� � Y � + � _ _ 1 ,�, - R, y
_ .
_ , - � _ ,
'' �
�
�' � � �
�' �
_ '-i +,�� � - , s - � - ' �. �. '
� � _
• ����� �
'� � '� � � .a �� - _
� _ .
:� � � �
, _ �� , .. a� � + �. -°�
��� "'. , �` �, �' � �I �, � _ , ".�_
� '
�� -
� ,
` m ,� ' . r - - - _ � �
,. - .. �F . y� �, -
. �� .. - ' � � � .t' � - �� �' .�� '1 , * �� : � - �.+t �F-��.
,
_ _ ,
.� _ �`_, °. q � I�y � � - �` �� � _ _ � � - -- {�
.-
_ , �
_ - �. "'� - � - �
r- ,
�� _ � . ,� - � - _
- � �„ � � �' � , _ _ ,��
°r
� + � � ,� � .�
• "" ' ' � - �
, � ,
'9�y�.7�' r g' �p . ,F ' �. r t� �' � F• � ,�
. _
' ° . ` '� _ , � '-
-
T ,� , _"� 7 - � � �
"� c_ . � ,
, ��� �_ : .. , _ - �
� � �
� +.r
� � ,
- � .
�
I � � � , • � - � � � �
. _
. j�, �
s� '�°`�'r�. � , ° y _ ., �i ' �r .
� I -
, „ �
�
�
� E _ � ,� � � � -—
. � , _ - � _— � _
_ � �
- � � . - � � �
�.` '� _ , -
-
, - + • �
.
� � ` �_ I� -_ . „�, � ; . � , � �, _ _
, . �4 =
, 5 i
� � ' 4 , � '__ _ �i . � � " ' M�
�
. - _
i
�
_
' � � . . �' . , _
fi - '
.
.
�t��� � . �' '� . .�� � ��
,
� �� �
� � '. � �_ � ;. ` ��
� �
� N
■ W£LL£SY£Y A l� �
I � o � � � � � �
�
�
p � m
�
o ruc ones � �
�ENi A�.
N
M/RAB£AU PKWY.
� �
_ J�� -
�
4
,NpIyTGlANERY A11.
�ENt A�. /NDJANA Al�£
.� _ .:- .., � � /' II � �
� M/SSYON A b£
h � �,
�c M/SSYON AV£ �
4 � � � � pK � _i_.
M/S57A'✓A 11- � O� 2 �'
� � e 2 �
� O � � Q U
�� � � � � � � � � 6 � ..��- �
� 2 �
2� o s $ F� o �
0 � Q BROADWiI Y AY£.
�� J
Q BROAOWi1 Y AVE. ��;
-r
BROADWAY Alg
P�WAY Ay�.
� K � �� SPRAGUE AVE AP SPRACUE Al£
2 � �C� � � V
2 � _��� SPRAWE AVE
� � � � 0 p � 47H AVE
SPRAGUEAV£ .�_. .-- � � � � �u
. . � h � O 47H AV£ � 2
� 41H A 11. � W Q � � � � � m 81H A 6£
-_.- 47H A b£ , � �i � � � W e
_,. y 2 m � 81H Alf.
� � 81H AVE.
87H AVE.
3 � I .,.. . ...I ...,I
�
D
Z
\
�
� 167H AVE.
y 167H A bE
o � � �
h �
°� � z - � Q
� � 2 � � H
\ O
� � 247H AVE
�\. j 241H A�£• m
�
_��,I_. �.\, I� I
32N0 A b£
32N0 A 11-
32N0 A b£.
�.
� � LEGEND
�
� J
C � N❑ TRUCK Z❑NE
CqA!Ab£
. .. . , . ._, � ., ., , . I �\ % ,,r---
PLOT DATE: 11/12/2008 FILE No.: No_Trudc_Zone.dwg
No. Date ey Ckd. Appr. Revision Drawn By: MP Date: ,�i,zizoos City of Spokane Valley SPOKANE VALLEY PROJECT No. — SHEET
Designed By: Date: ii ,2 2oos Department of Public Works C17Y�r
SCALE 11707 E. Sprague Ave. Suite 106 Spokane City of Spokane Valley
HORIZONT,4L: �° = 3,soo� SPOKA(E V>LLEY, WA. 99206 valley NO TRUCK ZONES � of 1
VERTICAL: N/A 509 921-1000
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: November 13, 2012 Department Director Approval: �
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business � new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Resolution 12-007 accepting City Council Draft Environment
Designations
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Shoreline Management Act (SMA) RCW 90.58
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Numerous discussions regarding local implementation
of the Shoreline Management Act under RCW 90.58.
BACKGROUND: City staff, with the assistance of URS Corporation, has completed the draft
Environment Designations for the Shoreline Master Program Update. The Shoreline
Environment Designations (SED) are the third phase of the Shoreline Update Process.
Designations are required by the Shoreline Management Act (SMA), and they provide the
framework for uniformly applying the goals and policies and use regulations within each
designation.
The Planning Commission review was completed over three meetings beginning on August 23,
2012. A public hearing was conducted on September 27, 2012, and deliberations were
completed on October 11, 2012. The Commission voted 6-0 to recommend acceptance of the
draft Environment Designations and the draft Alternative Designation Map.
Attorney Tadas Kisielius, VanNess Feldman GordonDerr, assisted the Commission with their
review by providing written comments. His recommended changes were incorporated into the
draft document prior to Planning Commission action. Mr. Kisielius attended the October 30tn
Council meeting to discuss his review of the document and address Council comments. No
changes were requested.
OPTIONS: (1) Approve the attached document as presented; (2) Approve with modifications; (3)
Send the draft back to the Planning Commission; (4) Request additional information from staff.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move to approve Resolution 12-007 informally
accepting the City Council Draft Environment Designations.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None
STAFF CONTACT: Lori Barlow, AICP, Senior Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution #12-007
City Council Draft Environment Designation Report and Map
DRAFT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. 12-007
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, ACCEPTING THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENT DESIGNATIONS
REPORT AND MAP FOR THE SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM, AND OTHER
MATTERS RELATING THERETO.
WHEREAS, the City initiated a Shoreline Master Program Update process in 2009; and
WHEREAS, on October 27, 2009, the City Council reviewed a public participation plan for the
Shoreline Management Program Update; and
WHEREAS, the public participation plan specifies the public involvement plan overview; and
WHEREAS, the Shoreline Management Program Update process speci�es that individual
components of Shoreline Management Program Update will be reviewed separately and accepted by
Council resolution,recognizing that as each component is completed,it will be used as a base upon which
to develop the remainder of the Shoreline Management Program; and
WHEREAS, on September 14, 2010, the first component of the Shoreline Master Program
Update,the Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report,was accepted by Resolution 10-014; and
WHEREAS, on August 14, 2012, the second component of the Shoreline Master Program
Update,the Goals and Policies,was accepted by Resolution 12-004; and
WHEREAS, the third component of the Shoreline Master Program Update is the Environment
Designations; and
WHEREAS, on November 5, 2009, the first Shoreline Master Program Update open house was
conducted where the Shoreline Management Program Update process was explained to interested parties;
and
WHEREAS, on August 23, 2012, the Planning Commission conducted a study session where the
Environment Designations and Map were presented and discussed; and
WHEREAS, on August 28, 2012, the Environment Designations and Map were sent to the
Technical Review Group for review; and
WHEREAS on August 31, 2012, the Environment Designations and Map were issued for public
review, and a mailing sent to all property owners within the shoreline jurisdiction that notified persons of
the scheduled open house and public hearing; and
WHEREAS, on September 20, 2012, an open house was conducted where the Draft Environment
Designations and Map were discussed with interested parties; and
WHEREAS, on September 27, 2012, the Planning Commission conducted a properly noticed
public hearing on the Draft Environment Designations; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered public testimony and written comments and
revised the document to address noted issues and concerns; and
Resolution 12-007,Accepting SMP Envirornnent Designations Pagel of 2
DRAFT
WHEREAS, on October 11, 2012, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended that the
Draft Environment Designations and Map, as revised by the Planning Commission, be formally accepted;
and
WHEREAS, this Resolution informally accepts the proposed Draft Environment Designations
and Map recommended by the Planning Commission, and it is anticipated that additional revisions may
occur prior to formal adoption; and
WHEREAS, the City Council Draft Environment Designations and Map are anticipated to be
formally adopted by Ordinance at a later date as a part of the complete Shoreline Master Program.
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane
County, Washington, as follows:
The City Council Draft Environment Designations and Map, attached as Exhibit A, are hereby
accepted.
Approved this day of , 2012.
ATTEST: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Thomas E. Towey, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Office of the City Attorney
Resolution 12-007,Accepting SMP Envirornnent Designations Page2 of 2
City Council Draft City of Spokane Valley
November 13, 2012 Shoreline Master Program
Exhibit A Environment Designations
City of Spokane Valley
Shoreline Master Program
Shoreline Environmental Designations
City Council Draft
Prepared by
URS Corporation
lA Introduction—Environmental Designations
Shoreline Environmental Designations (SED) are analogous to zoning designations for areas
within the shoreline jurisdiction. SEDs provide a uniform basis for applying policies and use
regulations within each designation, if allowed by underlaying zoning requirements. SEDs are
intended to encourage appropriate uses and activities while providing for protection and
restoration of shoreline ecological functions. It is anticipated that reasonable standards,
restrictions, and prohibitions on shoreline developments will be instituted as shoreline
regulations. This is necessary so that shoreline development will reasonably protect e�sting uses
and shoreline character and assure "No Net Loss" of shoreline ecological functions is achieved.
SEDs are established based on existing use patterns, the biological and physical character of the
shoreline, and the goals and aspirations of the community as expressed through comprehensive
plans. For the City of Spokane Valley, the Inventory and Characterization Report, prepared by
URS Corp, 2010 provided information on shoreline ecological functions; development patterns as
represented by existing building lots, zoning and land use designations; and on current and
projected uses that were used to determine appropriate SEDs.
The shoreline designations are illustrated on the Shorelines Designations Map which is an
integral part of the Shoreline Master Program. Characteristics and general management policies
for each of the designations are given below. They provide the basis for development of
regulations for each SED.
2.0 City of Spokane Valley Environmental Designations
The information provided for each SED generally follows the state classification guidelines
(WAC 173-26-2ll (4) and (5)). The state guidelines provide a recommended classification
system. Local governments may establish a different designation system or may retain their
current environment designations (WAC 173-26-2ll(5), 2ll(4)(c)(i)).
The e�sting Pastoral, Conservancy, and Urban SEDs are proposed to be changed to new SEDs
that reflect the findings of the 2010 shoreline inventory and of current shoreline uses as well as to
allow for management of the shorelines under the new state guidelines. The proposed SED
categories are Urban-Conservancy-High Quality (UC-HQ), Urban Conservancy (UC), Shoreline
Residential—Waterfront (SR-W), Shoreline Residential-Upland (SR-U), and Aquatic (AQ) for
those areas within the ordinary high water mark Much of the Spokane River shoreline is
designated as UC, with conservation areas identified in the 2010 inventory as UGHQ. These
designations closely reflect the existing Pastoral and Conservancy designations. Two shoreline
residential environments have been added along the Spokane River and at Shelley Lake to
include those areas currently zoned Single Family Residential and that have existing single family
� 1
City Council Draft City of Spokane Valley
November 13, 2012 Shoreline Master Program
Exhibit A Environment Designations
residences. The Shoreline Residential designation provides a means to allow for appropriate
residential uses for those areas directly adjacent to the water (SR-W) and for upland residential
areas (SR-U).
Each of the SEDs is described more fully below. Each SED includes a purpose statement, the
designation criteria and basic management policies.
Urban Conservancy—High Quality Environment(UC-HQ)
Pur�ose
The purpose of the "Urban Conservancy - High Quality" environment is to protect e�sting
ecological functions where they occur in high quality environments, while allowing very limited
compatible uses. High quality environments are those that include intact or minimally degraded
shoreline functions sensitive to human use. These areas require that only very low intensity uses
be allowed in order to maintain e�sting ecological functions.
Designation Criteria
Assign an "Urban Conservancy — High Quality" environment designation to shoreline areas that
were identified in the Inventory as high quality environments exhibiting significant habitat
diversity and were noted on the Inventory as conservation areas. These areas come close to
meeting the State's "Natural" designation but due to existing development impacts do not meet
all the criteria to classify them as "Natural". These areas are appropriate for limited low impact
public uses and for restoration activities. This designation generally impacts public lands - Only
three locations are located on private property.
An "Urban Conservancy- High Quality" environment designation is assigned to shoreline areas if
any of the following characteristics apply:
(A) The shoreline is ecologically intact and is performing important, shoreline functions or
ecosystem-wide process that would be damaged by human activity;
(B) The shoreline is considered to represent ecosystems and geologic types that are of particular
scientific and educational interest or
(C) The shoreline is unable to support new development or uses without significant adverse
impacts to ecological functions or risk to human safety, with the exception of the Centennial
Trail and other existing low impact public uses.
Ecologically intact shorelines can include large reaches covering multiple properties to small
areas located within a single property, and as used here, means those shoreline areas that retain
the majority of their natural shoreline functions, as evidenced by the shoreline configuration and
the presence of native vegetation. Generally,but not necessarily, ecologically intact shorelines are
free of structural shoreline modifications, structures, and intensive human uses.
Management Policies
(A) Any use that would substantially degrade the ecological functions or natural character of the
shoreline area should not be allowed.
� 2
City Council Draft City of Spokane Valley
November 13, 2012 Shoreline Master Program
Exhibit A Environment Designations
(B) The following new uses should not be allowed:
• Commercial uses.
• Industrial uses.
• Nonwater-oriented recreation. (Note: This does not preclude development associated
with the Centennial Trail and other limited low impact public uses.)
• Roads, utility corridors, and parking areas that can be located outside of UC-HQ
designated shorelines.
(C) Single family residential development shall be allowed within this environment if the density
and intensity of such use is limited to protect ecological functions and be consistent with the
purpose of the environment.
(D) Scientific, historical, cultural, educational research uses, and low-intensity water-oriented
recreational access uses may be allowed provided that no signi�cant ecological impact on the
area will result.
(E) New development or significant vegetation removal that would reduce the capability of
vegetation to perform normal ecological functions should not be allowed. Do not allow the
subdivision of property in a configuration that, to achieve its intended purpose, will require
significant vegetation removal or shoreline modification that adversely impacts ecological
functions.
(F) Maintenance of existing utility corridor and infrastructure shall be allowed. If existing high
quality vegetated areas are disturbed by maintenance activities mitigation shall be required.
Urban Conservancy Environment (UC)
Purpose
The purpose of the "Urban Conservancy" environment is to protect and restore ecological
functions of open space, floodplain and other sensitive lands where they exist in urban and
developed settings, while allowing for compatible uses, including appropriate public access and
recreational uses.
Designation Criteria
Assign an "Urban Conservancy" environment designation to shoreline areas appropriate and
planned for development that is compatible with maintaining or restoring the ecological functions
of the area and that are not generally suitable for water-dependent uses if any of the following
characteristics apply:
(A) They are suitable for water-related or water-enjoyment uses;
(B) They are open space, flood plain or other sensitive areas that should not be intensively
developed;
(C) They have potential for ecological restoration;
(D) They retain important ecological functions, even though partially developed; or
(E) They have the potential for development that is compatible with ecological restoration.
� 3
City Council Draft City of Spokane Valley
November 13, 2012 Shoreline Master Program
Exhibit A Environment Designations
(F) Areas within shoreline jurisdiction that are not mapped and /or designated are automatically
assigned as "urban conservancy" until the shoreline can be redesignated through a master
program amendment.
In the COSV, the Urban Conservancy Environment is located along much of the river with the
exception of areas that are either designated as UGHQ or as Shoreline Residential. As shown in
the inventory much of the near shoreline (riparian) areas are owned by the state and managed by
State Parks. Many upland areas in this designation are privately owned large tracts.
Management Policies
(A) Uses that preserve the natural character of the area or promote preservation of open space,
floodplain or sensitive lands either directly or over the long term should be the primary
allowed uses. Uses that result in restoration of ecological functions should be allowed if the
use is otherwise compatible with the purpose of the environment and the setting.
(B) Standards should be established for shoreline stabiliaation measures, vegetation conservation,
water quality, and shoreline modi�cations within the "urban conservancy" designation. These
standards shall ensure that new development does not result in a net loss of shoreline
ecological functions or further degrade other shoreline values.
(C) Public access and public recreation objectives should be implemented whenever feasible and
significant ecological impacts can be mitigated.
(D) Water-oriented uses should be given priority over non-water oriented uses.
Shoreline Residential—Waterfront Environment(SR-W)
Purpose
The purpose of the "shoreline residential-waterfront" environment is to accommodate residential
uses on lots within existing residential areas where the lot is immediately adjacent to the
shoreline.
Designation Criteria
Assign a "shoreline residential-waterfront" environment designation to shoreline areas if they are
predominantly single-family or multifamily residential development or are planned and platted
for residential development and where the lot is immediately adjacent to the shoreline .
Within the City of Spokane Valley, areas that are included in this designation include Orchard
Avenue, and portions of the Coyote Rocks development.
Management Policies
(A) Standards for density or minimum frontage width, buffers and setbacks, lot coverage
limitations, shoreline stabilization, vegetation conservation, critical area protection, and water
quality shall be set to assure no net loss of shoreline ecological functions, taking into account
the environmental limitations and sensitivity of the shoreline area, the level of infrastructure
and services available, e�sting aoning and other comprehensive planning considerations.
(B) Multifamily and multi-lot residential and recreational developments should provide public
access and joint use for community recreational facilities unless appropriate public access is
available as determined by a Public Access Plan.
� 4
City Council Draft City of Spokane Valley
November 13, 2012 Shoreline Master Program
Exhibit A Environment Designations
(C) Access, utilities, and public services should be available and adequate to serve existing needs
and/or planned future development.
(D) Management policies for direct access to the water, docks, and shoreline stabilization
techniques shall be included for this designation.
Shoreline Residential—Upland Environment(SR-U)
Pur�ose
The purpose of the "shoreline residential-upland" environment is to accommodate residential uses
within e�sting residential areas that are separated from the shoreline by other properties
Designation Criteria
Assign a "shoreline residential-upland" environment designation to shoreline areas if they are
predominantly single-family or multifamily residential development or are planned and platted
for residential development and that are separated from the shoreline by either state parks land
and/or by lots dedicated as open space, for example lots managed by a neighborhood association.
Within the City of Spokane Valley, areas located within this designation include existing
residential uses including the Greenacres neighborhood and Shelley Lake.
Management Policies
(A) Standards that take into consideration that these properties are separated from the waterfront
for density or minimum frontage width, buffers and setbacks, lot coverage limitations,
vegetation conservation, critical area protection, and water quality shall be set to assure no
net loss of shoreline ecological functions, taking into account the environmental limitations
and sensitivity of the shoreline upland areas, the level of infrastructure and services available,
existing zoning and other comprehensive planning considerations.
(B) Multifamily and multi-lot residential and recreational developments should provide public
access to the adjacent public lands unless appropriate public access is available as determined
by a Public Access Plan.
(C) Access, utilities, and public services should be available and adequate to serve existing needs
and/or planned future development.
Aquatic" Environment(AQ)
Purpose
The purpose of the "aquatic" environment is to protect, restore, and manage the unique
characteristics and resources of the areas waterward of the ordinary high-water mark.
Designation Criteria
Assign an "aquatic" environment designation to lands waterward of the ordinary high-water
mark.
� 5
City Council Draft City of Spokane Valley
November 13, 2012 Shoreline Master Program
Exhibit A Environment Designations
Mana eg ment policies
(A) Allow new over-water structures only for water-dependent uses, single family residential
docks,public access, or ecological restoration.
(B)
Permitting for activities and structures within the aquatic environment shall comply with all
state and federal laws,including coordination with applicable agencies.
(C) The aquatic environment shall allow for public use on public waterways .
(D) The size of new over-water structures should be limited to the minimum necessary to
support the structure's intended use.
(E) In order to reduce the impacts of shoreline development and increase effective use
of water resources,multiple use of over-water facilities should be encouraged.
(F) All developments and uses on navigable waters or their beds should be located and
designed to minimize interference with surface na�igation, to consider impacts to
public views, and to allow for the safe,unobstructed passage of�sh and wildlife.
(G) Uses that adversely impact the ecological functions of freshwater habitats should not
be allowed except where necessary to achieve the objectives of RCW 90.58.020,
and then only when their impacts are mitigated according to the sequence described
in WAC 173-26-201(2)(e) as necessary to assure no net loss of ecological functions.
(H) Shoreline uses and modifications should be designed and managed to prevent
degradation of water qualiry and alteration of natural hydrographic conditions.
(I) Local governments should reserve shoreline space for shoreline preferred uses. Such
planning should consider upland and in-water uses,water quality,navigation,
presence of aquatic vegetation, critical habitats, aesthetics,public access and views.
� 6
City Council Draft City of Spokane Valley
November 13, 2012 Shoreline Master Program
Exhibit A Environment Designations
3.0 Background—Existing City of Spokane Valley Environmental Designations
Most of the Spokane River shorelines have an existing SED of Pastoral. There are four areas
within the City that due to existing uses have been designated as Conservancy. Two of these
areas are associated with railroads; the other two are Sullivan Park and Mirabeau Park.
Shorelines in the Orchard Avenue area are designated as Urban. The shorelines around Shelley
Lake are designated entirely as Conservancy. The gravel pits were not designated in the current
Shoreline Master Program, though the Sullivan Road grave pit has a shoreline permit.
The Pastoral and Conservancy designations are both protective of the natural environment and
limit many uses. A description of each of the current environmental designations is provided
below as well as a summary of some of the relevant Goals and Policies contained in Chapter 8 of
the City Comprehensive Plan.
The Pastoral Area Desi n� ation
The Pastoral area is intended to protect and maintain those shorelines which have historically
been subject to limited human interference and have preserved their natural quality as wildlife
habitat and places of scenic beauty. These areas are appropriate for passive agricultural and
recreational uses. Areas most appropriate are: 1) open spaces used for livestock grazing and
harvesting of non-cultivated crops; 2) shorelines which have physical limitations which would
preclude permanent structures, such as floodplains, meandering stream ways, cliffs, and steep
slope areas subject to landslides; and 3) wildlife habitats and areas of beauty whose ecological
systems will only tolerate limited human interference. Because the areas are not suited for
permanent structures, they are valued wildlife areas which provide for grazing and "wild hay" for
dispersed-use outdoor recreation. Management of the area should be designed to prevent the loss
or reduction of the wetland area and to restrict development from hazardous areas.
The Conservancy Area Desi�nation
The Conservancy Area is designated in Spokane Valley for the purpose of maintaining the
e�sting character of shoreline resources while providing for non-intensive uses. Those uses that
are preferred in the Conservancy Area are those which may utilize the natural resources on a
sustained-yield basis. These uses include passive agricultural activity, timber harvesting on a
sustained yield basis, and diffuse outdoor recreation. The Conservancy Area is designated to
protect agricultural land from encroachment by urban uses while providing for recreation
wherever recreation will not interfere with agricultural practices. Nonpermanent kinds of
structures and uses which will not reduce the quantity or quality of the physical and biological
resources of the area are to be given priority in the Conservancy Area.
The Conservancy Area is intended to prohibit intensive use of areas having physical hazards,
severe biophysical limitations which would not be appropriate for rural or urban uses, areas prone
to flooding, and areas which cannot provide adequate water supply or sewage disposal for
intensive activities.
The Urban Area Desi�nation
The Urban Area designation is intended to accommodate compatible water-dependent and water-
oriented uses in shoreline areas. The Urban Area is to be managed so that shoreline developments
will enhance and maintain the shoreline for a multiplicity of uses. The Urban Area is designated
in Spokane Valley to encourage the redevelopment of existing urban areas and to control the
� 7
City Council Draft City of Spokane Valley
November 13, 2012 Shoreline Master Program
Exhibit A Environment Designations
expansion of urban uses in characteristically rural areas of the County. Those urban uses which
are water-dependent and can provide visual and/or safe access to the waterfront are to be given
priority for shoreline locations.
� $
. . _ - � • .t - .. •� 'Y�F , -+�:4+f `;�l�. �`�;',4+ ,��, , .r" �+ - a • .:{... 'i;. , �, °y, .���` � ' I -
- . �
.. ..:.- °- j �#���� . ._�� ii.r.<' � � �i � ` .` t� ,L��:� �.-,.�* . 'p.�� ,�i� ' �+�+�nyy�� y-*�!,,��V`' �l' y�'.;r _°'f'�� _ _--a�'y -�,. ��•'
,..- � ._ .. . , ' . .
��i� .. ,�, . ' "� ��..�.. � � . . �:. ��s��� 'C:.'�;,-��"f���'�`•.�. 'tie�����(�'1�Fr�,.C�y�l'�.k �� ,:� - "�'a't�'��4 ��''�` '3a'�' ' •!.�trR�.%'L '���;'��.f -..��„�• � '� �_.� �i .�'�, .
° � , -� �R�,�� . -"��. .�' �, I y �.� �' I. � '"�
, . ,
,. '; - '`-�. , �����y-�-. � 1 �. J . _ ra 5k :"��1'-y� �'�'s��s�i�i' �pi ���:;�_ a' ��?�,�"iiw = • .+I�.a���i'•- � - - *� r .
�/ L.• � � r.y r ��;'...,. Q - . �,'� }� +y(�ri,�_:. .�R .7.. i a� :, � . �� tl�7il� : _ �'�'��
� - . r� �
... �/�j� . 'i. �,'�^yJ'C.•�_,, 1 �` '.�. ��� 1 .';ry ., Z .5 4���.�..J �' �-.�����}'��'+y���{_- ��,d;!� � ;.;w{r�...'�R'����.�"�` _`r`I �1�, _- _ -- �. _ .. -�'�'
. u " #
� T . . . . _ ,"'�. . �M'-� , , .�
. ;�- ROR ,_. � *�� , , . �".:, o .�,::� . �1��r � � + :�' �T - - - �
_
_ r-� � �.�� �'
��
: � , . � � _
�
.� _ _ '�'r � � � _ _ _� . � -
�
a� � r" � � • G .�� i �� ' �tl;''- ��
., - . ..
� .,1fi h. � T �� .` ���.- � �Jl`,�r. .��_ — �_ - _ r�� " ,� -
. = i�
_ .� _
L
`�1 : .: . . _
, �
., ` . �,, •�� ' �.�� ; r � - - - , - , � ��-
�_��
= r- __ _
- } - -
a " . _
� .
♦ �--'.,�i..� '.--e .
v
l�!!y� , � . `. ".� t� '_ .. _ . . __ _ . r.
� ��
, ..:.., ' ..-.->. � - ,:. �r=r
.�,
>
1 �:'�' ' _� ♦` ... ��F �R a..' "._- . :.�,_ — �P'-r � � -'�� ' . �, - n _ .�� �
_.
. � }
� .. �
,,,/I� T �
� a ; - -
��"'� ���" F-s°` °° , C� R\� }I W� f i � rt� � � ' �,-_ �� ` �
. , , . �„� .. � . m � '� q: ,� ,�e,�= _ - _.� � ;o- z= ��L� � �� �� I'i .
.
_� ��, � � _�
.
, ,.
�=y.:e 1 i_.-- ='--.-_�'' ..,. ��`� `•-. � �� �- - '�,�e�°-- ., � ��` :?� - — - -�;,i�,�- - � , �� _ :� _
_o .
M �
y .
< < �
,._�, ._�i �._. ,4''�� .�7� ��:.� .. �� �� ll - � � _ `� ' ' " ' _ �
:trr. � '� ay+,,�. -,�}' k � -
.
__ p,d �: , ; �.3�„.�iT'a' . ."� � � � � F !r�—_ ��__ _ �_ �,��,�� .�.� + � A�
. +�' 3„
,� - � ..,-,� . , _
, .� � � _ �
, . �, ��Y.!; P�RE �•� '.. � � . �T_�.. "-�• � '4 ,. - C �-
s ..;
. - _ � :,
-,. -�t���,- �M - �`' � � ? ,'�� a `� __ - ' _ ,:�� ou� ^dT'i_� �� . • �� ��Ny�,��`'.
�� _ ,
_�� ,� � 1
�r , L .�� '� ; '���,� ° ��I � T � y, - -- ,- _ ` t-�, '� I;
_-�<�,° '�"j.1f+��`� . ' - - - F ^,.., `� J1' � ,i�..��� ., .. F�'a„ � .�_ . ,� �° �„� � °s.r� ..k� .
� , ,.,� . "�� " � � f� k ��
. .. -
. . � ,�,4 � _ o
w
, �` �. �_�, ,. - . � - - - " " _ '� . ., +���
. � - .
._ r , _ . � - � � I ,
�������.���#�ti_ k�� � ' ._.--_ " �v_r.� �°;; , :�r;.�M ���� I � d. .��� ��-* � Z � �.. �'�� if� �'�}�ki' + ���i � �` ' � _ n
..� _ - �'
, ; ,
.
, • - .
- �il.l � .� _ _,:ir�.� ��,�+ , � ,�._� k` � . -�j, _-�- � � �" • �,I i� -� * - . EUCLIDAV• "����L 4 EUCLIDAV
�� L �� �i�� ,�- - I��
� s, �r .',- „ _ - e. a. � _ -, -
t -
� �� _
' .� - �' �+,' . — - - �� �'�r"� _ -. �'"��
„y��*_ _- _... .-t^._ _.
. �
� �
";�� 4°�' -,e � •r i3 ��'�. ^y'�/4fr': � r..,._:. ���,�'--- �r-.. i ��� _ �.1�"wr� � -._�I� � - - �;_ ,�.��' F . T -
r - _ -- . .
, _ - .
��� � �_�. �'.'�"`� 'P'��iP�.:��+ "w� .,�� ° �'��a ���� � .'�� 3�ti -_ �F� �'! �Ir� . j # r i � , �? � � � ,_ '.i�„- p. - i
' [�-{ ;3.. i. � ....�_ .�-�..'� I � r�j, 9 �,�P_a`"� _ r� , _ ��, p , � �-- ���- '.k. �
._ "f
- . ... � '� , ��� _ � ar_ � . � (A � Ir�1 . 4�
�. _ . A 3'!�-.J�.��!a4r., r j o�^��;��, - t �_ ' .� �. - � .��8 T� .� . �4.' , '_ ' � � �L.Q � _ .. �����,yy��� '
- - �,�., a - ... , 3 -.. :l T�'■ � r�';�,� � ��'k.��--' • �. �'�� .t. �� .. j �� '.7i, �_
� r t�UCL� V �Y� �_
_ . ,. �� ,��,, t .-: .'� e .� - .. -1�"� � � �,, — � �
- " �t �; ';�-� �,:4"1�+ �i.�?�� ,,� +. - r - , ` _ - = °'.� �-
F �`� . �-
� �_. _ �. , .�s-�. _ ILS^e4`°� v�� �,ry� +} 6� # . °yi.� _Y . ,� � . �`�. I '� _ yy� -1� .
. _
.
. _ � �{: ° "�.', . ' '. s ... �. -;-, w �if�y�e `� � � '�"' � .,
-4� ��rrk� ,�� ...�S�O�I.y,,,q i•a 3Cv _ • . ..s. . � Y� "N,�.�- - ` '� j ..*°�' :�+�" �^ - Av . r tr +'" �ry�;Y� .7' �.a' ,�r
_ �
�
, . U��"F.,�i :. 7'?��-'= . �'�. ._ ,. ' .,�r " � �y� '�(A � r� �,,�' ,�:J�a. . .
_ , .
: � `
. .
_.r -y - -Y' �
_ _ � : �
- L� �F� ��f '����f:F.���Z,�.�� � ,�� �IF+'�`'.Y�y f-�"� a��"�k ?r. . . ��� �ii. '�,. . . -^AR�� ,. . ��- f 1 �. ' � %,[�.`��"-{, 71,��?;'� � ,R�.
�,_ j� � 1 4,
-. d� ` ' ,:�7+��I�P �.�+`�.�, � ' ..�..�p.� '°` x�.,1P �'y�r,r�� - T� .. 1 . ��� ��� . ki� �! � �. '�.'...'^�r�" �:JI� ���.!.�
��.� � ;� ,
. . , .
. • . �
r' 7- �4�����. ��-• "� "' a.�� ' -�i�1-. _r: �.�. ' � j�..4 ' ., ..m � ,— .. — " ., m �,.g�1 i � ,��y���!.,..�. �S�.y�' � �-���
� � �
ONTGOM�I�Y��+ :' � � , �`_� ;�. � . : �u .e� �• ��` }a � � . � ' - - ,
� -� � . � � ,
, �_ _� ,., r .� . ,� ''�r � .a �y � -. � _� ��"� '+ ..'! -�r. �:� c,� �1,�
:
� � � � ti
. e�_ .. _ `�-- ,. �. • . , . , �. �.�`'� .�-2 �� - `�F E���° +��" .�
_ _ � -
� °
� , _
. .
#� � '
. _ . _ � : - - /
>
_ 4,� „r �� . o , ,. ,' , . . t� . Yr,, , , + . �'� , � . .�t .,.
e
� �.�.� il� ,:'�"�'f�_. � .,� �� � r,�ll- k �"�i� - "' . s`�' M - ,y` �,+'/���:;�� m' ""`*'�} �>
- � . - , � ,. " . . �.,
_ s .
�{��,� . .,f,� , l, _ l� ,� a� �� �Y�. � ��. �1 �'*'�� �'- ;'a
� ,'� � $�P
. . � .._.�" �`,. ' ':�c.e. • • y .' - �. _�r � �:, � .. � ::��.- .. / a..� � �•f k�: ���, � - � j' �� � "s
.
, r- �_ � "'�� . =-e. � .�`�- -._n- ; , '��'.i ��, _ ' � v° �' ! � ,� ��� .i�i;u�. t'� �� *t'��6rt'T�,.�„ .r.-.'- �,��'j.- 'r�yiii�i�
..-
, e P � � y� - . .r°��f` , y, i� -tlllir'1- '
.. E
i��; w� � � 4 �. �-� '[{:.� �+.+"�1��'7� •��'Y' ;� _ `�' I� +� _ - . . F�' •e%� !� "'*i-,��. ;�jd,ssn, >��q'
� - - , �,,
.
_ � � I k� t��'+�ii. -4�.��E��" -� � .., : -.'� � -� � �� . �'T'� � _� . - �.�,,�' �!�t'�k . ' �k. � i ..� f� �!�.�� e �s yp�-
+ `
-� -� � ���-�:le� �,, , � , , - ,..,6 _ ��- ,�r A °° ��`
_ _, . } . {
. ,.r. .��e_ r� h 5y �� ... � � . :'� �.� - � �..x ��1 ♦� . . . /�� . ��!� - '� }� � r yy. �WS � � . '°_�ffi�7��.A", �.•}-� e 5.y'4:�
-� -- .�r- - ,C. 1�- .,.�' �_ � .�y�, •� � , _ • � �' . '� . � �- . �„ $' '� a�.��,. -�� � ,�aF�, r�'=' e,
�
_ ; - � , , . ,:�
'�" °, _ ,
. , _ , . _
;'.+r. � ' •I� �'. i:� �Y-.�: . . ,,�. � 4 �,,ati i di ," �.'. ! ��-.r .��`.'� ,� �y 1 �, ��,'�. .�.��, �. y •* -�h .1� a�r�r, { .�a` �
� � u �
: g.r i._,1 _ ���.{� � . ,��- _ . - ' � ' � AV -_ � e�;i ..� .',.,, , 'w, �� ,�, .- l. ,�-,�,. . �.
,
��.,._� 1 � � - �-` . �� � � � �' ,
�` +� , �,,i � ,, �tM r. + _ � .. . _ r� �� INDIANA �� h `� � . '. , , � �";�� °T.. e�'�i ,��
, . � � ., ..
� �" * - �� � � � � '
, . ° ` . i > 4 �• ,,. [�'r '�,�, T�'
+ • �}I� i�+����. i r '.., _��� ` `�9' . . .3. � � � _ � ' - � !1 � '- �*: ia` �1 �� � �.�; ��.R}_.
� 'e� �� �,, a.. �� � . . .. � �� . " . ��� .�� ���� r.: � ' 'r� ��r�"��� ^ ,
!
_ ,y , �
�� � - . , . ,�F, k,�r ` .- , ���� �r , .� �'� . _,� T�„�„4,
,q �,
�._ . -�k� �T �� i;�����;.M� � ' � ` ',�_��~_Yf�- �� -� ..,�.��i� �' � R." F w'_.G . �::{��I',t�'_'� � , aTd�e I���k �'� .��. .a `�� ry'� .�� ;�i �T.
�__..•iM� i I Interstate 90 Interstate 90 _ ° . � ,�+ -�,•:�: �, r#� _ j � j��` i ,�a�;� � �,� �
�
' I _
� � , � � � ��.���� �
�,'��-- "'�. --��._ - - _ � �J�c = 1 1 � �, �� im �.. � }� Fy. - _ �
_
;� , .... _._ . ,. +� - � � � ia
' - - - ' F �'. +�,� �
1 w-
' ��I��"� -�i�'� "��`'� ' '�_.. �,,:_ ..,�:° � ` ��y, <r.a . _.,,..� .. . .i `'.♦ _ '�9 � ��� � wlzl�, � 7.�r i�Er� F� '.r5. �ly .'s'r�.
` � � •� "' �f� � '_ ..'',' ''�" _ ' `, y �I i' �'� r,.r
�" :�' µ��`�l� `� ' ' 30+ ,� �fs..�i I?'�', I ,. . _,,., _ _ y�' '� �r ` Ty �f. '�r � ,���` •y T� �' � ,k
.
. , , ye , _ �r _ �
. . _
. - .r� . . � �._ a'*x- .., . _ �T , . . , . _... ,. � ��.. �....�_s. �'� I-, , -..� "��:• � i ,Fi -
�+ ` �
\,
, , , , .. _. +� �,�-� _ .,. . . f � � ; , ,�.. � _r� . , �I. � _� - -..� i , `» � i . x_ � _ _�, �,'� - 4 �,�
� _
� _�'- � ��.�. . ' ' ,� ,
�.
� � ,� .,E4 ,.. MISSIbN dV � ' � ���. � • ' -, �� , e, '*s � �l:�- :i��^�f��,:� :_{t,;.. Ml$S4QN AV �r , ��� -
� �� �
� ,
.
� . .
* �: .
�� ��� -� �
, , e �- ---
- . , . t . , .. � . , � - _-,_ . --w� ��. �� _ � __ � . -r-- . -
, _- . , _ �
;,.- _� . - , . - - _ �
. y
- � � -s � . ,
.. � - - / pg �
,
t . 0�O . . .. fk.,,yAi ° r ".�� '�-� ..' . '.. "��� 3., r � ������ r1� ' 4i4� ..��` - �#r � - I�`` - . .. . _ . .
_ ti v ' �
_ �_ ! �`''�`�,�, � �r
� �
. . . , . � : ` `` ��
� �
o � �` ' i' ` _
_
� . _ .
, - .L , y . F � . � -� .� ., ' "�`~
,. � ° • - � �
_ - ,T
� . . .
,.. o o "� ' , . c , , . � '��, i r. .._- - . :�, 1 r '� , � e � :. .
. �- -
� -� - � . ._ � �,�. , -
_.
. � oQ . , �.•. r - �, _ , +,�:,� -
, . �
.r � , . ,
�; � � +k'�..- "- -� ,.�� , '. � ';�,,, ;' a k,� . ..4 ;� . '�^� �: f ! _ +r,� �'�` � . _ t
�
,. .: { �� � _
..,. "L .� ��..�-.� �'• �- '�. ,�' . , *_ F T �!iI���� + �w r �.s-- �� �13f�;�r,�4 r.,�� .� �"� .q r' ' �. .
�, ,:
, _ �. .. � � �T " .. �S' � ' `-
�
. � .
�F -i ' � S� FR' _ J
+
�� .[ � �... ,+:..# � 1�� �I.F., �F �-.: ,�� .�����,,�.. . #�`i �. �..` s:i� ��;__ ..,�""y - �, A+� _� ��r, ' � �s. . i x .� . • � .,�t. _ x�`
Y y �
� �
I L #n� �r[�°, . r. -rY� . _' " ° �.M�d ,�y�tF � s'�:.kT;���,�,� •7' 'i� �}���` �. ,��-- ' � � �'} _ ,�'y`s.i .-"w .
� � � <, L {��
.�,�?� . ❑ �, . ., . F,' .,�+..�'y� � �i. y�'�� f�'..� , ' � �r�T.�. - - 4 ��r...._ ' , _y'Sw�r �f.. �'}���- - '�:�;.Y';+��-��.���.. .��E�i�`� - . .F . i
� } " .' '.
. _ . .. . , � . . . i ' - +y�
.,:_ fls :.. � t ,,. �.... � .. ���1C +4". ,a . .�. �4.' .;��r� -+_ . ' . 'l' :r'-*{�k�' 1.��.• ''�� y�.�. " .���`���� � �' °r,r
�
�
� � � � ��-;t �.�' . - � . :�'_.{� i i� � � . � �,y..� �. N�� . � '4F , '�
. ' . _
. +
, � L
i °' ' �.
:'F�.: ... p k �4:'� '�'. .� �, ; .: � Y }�,� ,�a �F'.' ��. - � ��,,.. "1' "+ _. _ . � f's��.. '1���'��� ��4,��. ' `.
_ _ +
r.. � � "'� } , s'_, �� �r r s . �,: � p� �t�-�t�t� , � ��'��•:1 f' � �" - `2 .+1�.+=�4 ��r �� � -
, ., � . . . . . .. ',, ' � _ �y .
.. �
-;�;. .� . �; ,�y� . "'.• � �y+r•' � al �:.� . :� � . r :.. � �.. _.. -� . ..f �.�.�, tr�..��,',�`���•�.4. �Y�=--'�` ..r"'''. �� +f-�.� . 'v.k��• `..��`�..,.'��O�, '� „f� � �� Y
. �'. . �..�Y � � � �+. � ,.�y ,�#`"__ � �;"�. w r.8`I�OADUVAYAV+;�,�-� �«..� . �''�, � {�' '�� � F,,�� " i� tl :Nr���*+�� ,"� �.. �. �
. � � -- ,
.,.�� : .� :� � ,,.. � �- 3 5., �f r ., „ ' � � " - � "c- ` - � . � , '. ' a ' '� i�► � �,�s �� _
� • �� , � � �,�. � .� '�]f.�. ;... . .�. _ � ... �.-. . .,,� � . � � . ' � •7,i
y� .�:� ������R..,. � ....._ `��'* �',,1' . , y�, y �tiyn� ,� r,�a.,{°_ ..�:-w: "r. _2�.1_`�i r � � y, �C' �.r .� �y ��I,"r . . . ���'-+���j, .'����� �+� ���� �" �
, • � � _ . �
�+� ti� ' �.` r";'� �M�'";�, ;�-� �_ � � ,� ,.� �- � � , . +�'���v . �r �- �>,� �.. •� ��
" ��i,� � . � ,N� - � ` - - ,� �'' _i f� �•�T • ���
_ I � `"' � ♦
. ' t � ,. . � .p . ~' 4.,„ ��- � ■
a � , �, 1,�- �z �. ♦ _
� � �r� �* .�nl�" �+��� �" �.�F'� _ � „P �° � r i . ' 'i ;•�t,y �e" ,���`[ �r- . . '�'� +1� ,' ��„�� � ��: �I. �`������y��+ i
s . . � F +. �� `���,�
__ .'
%`- � r �' ' � �1 �,* a_ � u '� rr�' z V�4LL�YWAYAV �rr_^� �.�� e .J ,_ � -- f;,>�� I���' . , ` ,,
'� .'�' � +�#� � _II .� .�,'� r ��vr'� �` �y0.LLE * , . �'i � ^�... ��1���� �
., = � �
�
. �_ • ,
��f o "� � �', �` I� �r� � �I � w � , . . � �4,S,:.0 .���*r ',� ._ _ , ��J: r.'. ' � �r"„ . 5 ��,�� �, .
. , . , 1
' � n � - ,
. 1
"_ � „ .� �'Orchard Avenue r. ,'.,,�� �. �.�yg��,_.,__.,� __� i f# � .-.'? � • • " ;. . � - �,`�t�'--��;- �".y�.�° ;�� - - ; ��` � `II�� �
� -
. _
_• •- �y . •
� . #� �, .,... �� .7 .�' ' ���ya . p \`L„�,.�. , . '�`+� - " �0.` �.. '� ..c.r�. - _ (A ] i�l i.r+.R�t7 •,�+e "�l.� . R ��. � - �y�_ _,� f .,y.. i"
� . YWA AV.
, .
. ,���
� �
.. o - ,�F..4 ��� „r: , - ' , .•+ � "'�, ����" -� ��,. �F* Q. _ ���"'� _ � ._ � f;s - `�� �_ .
� ' F r y� - � �1
. . �. .: . �.,m � ,r°�-: � f o.�.. � • ,. �- . �� � - � , � e�, �„ ` r . �� - I Lr-s - r � ,''� r, ,
V, . �,�
� ` .
� �, . � � 3 � .r. - . �..� � ❑ �' ,�. . ' . � �.> _ :.��� �� - I � :ti '� [r�-°� � �'�' . ..�- _ _ 1• _ ;..s•_ �"i±.��� .
. - � _
' � �j�,
fl : ,F �. ._ . :.. , - . ._ . . .#- � � �.�. - . _ .. . - '� .�W ' .,� - , i� - - L: 61�'i7 , - � - _ _ -�u a
�� � w*, . r _� +' ;�, r` � � �� ,. ' � � 'lr . ,,`' '� � . , �a � � 4 �., "_ �, � �' °€' � ;r. �r'1 *�� " +. q��.. �RI ��µ'
'� 4
: . t_ � _ 4 ,� �, �. , ,, r'_�._� ' 4 � �� �-.;,�-., �� ,. , . � �i��b+: Shelley Lake _ .
,�
� , ? � ,�,�'
, , ,
- .- , . ��.�' : #f_�,.�.�F',_��:". . .1!'�4 , . _,� , • , , • . .
, _ . .� ; - �' �� - . . . � � .
-__.. —�_,, . ,. 5 . - �:j. . �.} - . , - i-� _ `,� ; :- , _ i �,� i�-
_ � � � �� � � , ��
-,..° _.. '. . p.F'*: . +, �' . �II _ t� � �J' iM
_, r 1`�I ♦ 4i1., I
�
� �F
s� . . , : . � - ■q� � ' :��
,
_ � . :�_ �
,
, . �u�� . � �.�...=- �. !,� � .�., . - .�,�� � '�- - - � _ _ � _ -;�� _
_
R. � , �
. _ „�
_ �'�s _�
:.
,. .. ��; . .ri!�+�* , -..� .��+±�"�. ..� , +� �.� �+k-:-..-�'� __.:..��• ��'�i� '�� ��. `5.� ��' ,.
` i
,. :.
_. �� . �.. �.
G . � . .:' . M� . ,
�
N
� Shoreline Residential - Upland Aquatic Environment City Council Draft
- Shoreline Residential - Waterfront - - - - � Centennial Trail Environment Designation Map
� Urban Conservancy Parcels P,�o;e���sambert��,zf�,�max�on=�
e�„�axMe.�r,an:-z�zaz de�e� City of Spokane Valley
Origin:471�degrees
� Urban Conservancy HQ �.._.._� City of Spokane Valley Shoreline MasterProgram Updates
° °'S °3 06 November 13, 2012
Miles
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: Nov 13th, 2012 Department Director Approval: �
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑old business � new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed Resolution 12-008 I-90 Business Route Signage
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: n/a
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: info memo on 6/29/10 and 10/18/11, discussion on
7/26/11 and 10/30/12.
BACKGROUND: Council has authorized staff to move forward with establishing an I-90
Business Route along the Sprague Avenue, Appleway Boulevard, Appleway Avenue and Barker
Road corridors from Exit 285 (Sprague Avenue) to Exit 293 (Barker Road).
Since the last discussion, WSDOT (Washington State Department of Transportation) has
developed additional signing options that include Appleway Blvd. Although having both street
names on the sign will be helpful to drivers, it does result in a reduction in font size and
therefore readability for drivers. The new sign designs are attached. Staff will continue
discussions with WSDOT on the preferred design, but favors option #5 due to its readability and
larger business route logo.
Staff will also look at installing signage at the end of the Sprague Eastbound off-ramp to clarify
the location of Sprague Avenue vs. Appleway Blvd.
Upon approval of the resolution, staff will initiate the request with WSDOT and attempt to get the
request on the spring meeting agenda for the American Association of State Highway
Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Special Committee on U.S. Route Numbering. Staff will also
enter into an agreement with WSDOT to reimburse them for costs associated with replacement
of the Exit 285 and Exit 293 signage. Pending an approval of the business route request in
spring 2013, we anticipate that the sign replacements would be complete by the end of the
2013.
OPTIONS: Proceed as proposed, or as modified; or direct staff further.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Motion to approve Resolution 12-008 Supporting the
Establishment of an Interstate Business Route
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The estimated cost of $60,000 is proposed to come from the
Capital Reserve Fund.
STAFF CONTACT: Inga Note, Senior Traffic Engineer; Eric Guth, Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS: 1) resolution 2) map 3) WSDOT signing options
DRAFT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. 12-008
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, SUPPORTING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN INTERSTATE-90
BUSINESS ROUTE FOR SPRAGUE AVENUE,APPLEWAY BOULEVARD,APPLEWAY
AVENUE,AND BARKER ROAD BETWEEN EXIT 285 AND EXIT 293,AND OTHER
MATTERS RELATING THERETO.
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes that the Sprague Avenue corridor, which includes both
Sprague Avenue and Appleway Boulevard, parallels I-90 and has many businesses of interest to the traveling
public; and
WHEREAS, the Sprague Avenue corridor at one time had an I-90 Business Route designation; and
WHEREAS, the City is willing to pay for updates to I-90 signage, including installation and ongoing
maintenance of "return to freeway" and trailblazer signs, and is willing to reimburse Washington State
Department Of Transportation(WSDOT) for staff time expenses incurred through the process; and
WHEREAS, the City recognizes that the logical endpoints of an I-90 Business Route would be E�t 285
(Sprague Avenue) and Exit 293 (Barker Road); and
WHEREAS, the City recognizes that the business route application will be handled by WSDOT and
processed through the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the American Association of State
Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO) for approval before any signage can be modified.
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane
County, Washington, as follows:
Section 1. Establishin� an I-90 Business Route in Spokane Valle�
Upon the approval of WSDOT, FHWA, and AASHTO, the sections of Sprague Avenue, Appleway
Boulevard, Appleway Avenue, and Barker Road between I-90 Exit 285 and E�t 293 will be designated as
the Spokane Valley I-90 Business Route.
Section 2. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption.
Adopted this 13"'day of November, 2012.
City of Spokane Valley
Mayor Thomas E. Towey
ATTEST:
City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge
Approved as to Form:
Of�ce of the City Attorney
Resolution 12-008 I-90 Business Route Page 1 of 1
E1-1
15fiin E45915P
- za,.
��� EiCIT ��� ��E ,�E E��� �$5 ,S�E
Bl]SIHE55 ���3�� � � � � ��� y � I ��
�ooP
= C�� 36�• sHi��o BUSp��
� Sprag � � A►re 9�p
� �aa•� �s-sri��a
�
' Barker Rd
16EM --------------------
E X 1 T autiex oN veuow
v0'E
��E � � ��L� �I2E 32'X22°ARROW � i i ,N�� � 32'7C23'ARROW
� 1�'E
71
I
1 6aR�ER WHITE OH GRE£N
R=��'� SRE C06E G MD4�FlEp
S!i=2"
60ROER WHITE ON GREEN
Rw'!23r� SIZE CfJQE E
TH-2in
E5-101 E4501 SP
z�-
155in
,�� E�CIT ��� ,s�
T
'f2E �J��� ,��� 18E
,33.�, APR � �ew� y BI ►r�d
eus�N€ss
�, eus�NESs
36" SHIELi? o �+ � 27.5"X31" ARROW � � rr r�+ � � ��� `�'�
r 11-3'Ell ' � � / � 36'SHIELQ
B a r k e r R d ----�-�y-----------------
16EM E/1►I� ---- au�ck on� re��ow
,m�
I7.5"]C}1'ARR9�N � ��L� � 2i.5'�[3S'ARRQW
10°E
B�RDER WF#IT� ❑N GR'��H Z
�{=1zfTl SiZE CDO� � 60RDER WH1TE ON GREEN
rx.rz' SIZE COOE C MOQiF�EO
TH=2in �+_�'
�l i � E45Q9$�P 1. �.O l
�'- ,�`�` E4S41SP
r, Me' _ � . zar
1
� i� �/�1� i ��� ,S`E 5� �!t�� �$.J 1SE
6U5lMf35 8u51YE55
�� S p r a C� u e �g p �5H1�° 9+� A R P I e vu►a y B I v►d ,��
as-sHree.o
� r
56'EY 93.TEAf �� � � �� � 1, � �l.� 13.3'6f
u r
v e .------------------------
�`+�� BIhCK ON YE�04V i
x � irE � �-r�T BIAGK ON YELLQW
n�3,.�� � a hl LY nsx3,��� ,,�, , � � iCE
I �"�`� DNLY ,"���,
1zE
1- i
BORf]ER Bf1R�ER NAi1T£t}k GREE3Y
1�12" LVH17E oN GREEN Raf1' $IZE CG�E'C Mpp1FiE�
TM,y Sf2E CoUE E MOOIFiE� TM�-
� E4-5[115P � E45p15P
2a�' �'
r
�� E7C[T ��Jr► ,� ,� E�CI�` ��$ ''rJ ,�
BWIFESE
s�'sm�n Q n Q f n � �W�� �� V� 733EM ��� A P P ��w a y B�v d 9 p w-swFl.f1
�� � P
� �
13�I T� S p ra g u e Ave ,x� ,�� TCl S p� ra q u e A�e ,��
�------------------
EXIT BLACK 9N Y£LLSlW E�IT ---- e`�c"`°N'��`°�
,� ,�
��„ � , ONLY � �-�A� ��R� � , ���Y � ���
�
euROER YNHITE ON GREEN a0atssrx yyHITE ON GREEN
R=�2' SIZE COmE C MO�IFIE� tt+�tr 51ZE CpDE C MQDIFIE�
ni.z- rH r
� E45015P
� � - 1
1b'E �x�� ��� 15"E
,��� APp � eway B�ad
susir�FSs
�ay� S p ra g u e Aa e� �i� �-��
; E�IT }�
swc�c ati veurnv
37NT'RRROYI� � I v�L� � 37'%7T MROW
/Q'E
�
�RO�+ WNTfE O!J GRE£N
H'�+Y SRE CD�E C MO�IFIF�
THrl"
�� �
� I � i�il.SS[+:YAIC � _ i � . • _ _ _ � i Y I e
� I � e — — I �--�
� � .���I���� ����� ��������Y� , � W ��kz, �. � ` � .�
I r —i °
.�
' 1 — � � � +�� —, �
����� ��.i� i Y�ti�.l� ��� �I�l.. !� � ' ..r—'-' Y��-� � , �. i I � � -�' ..��
� 7 . ,.. � ` ,� � �
. � � "� � �- � ._ �� , �
� -� � � _ � , � � - �
� � � .
AM' w~
� �#lY �=��� '�"' ,.�,►� � �- ° � �-�_=,� �
�
�-I���. �� .�,:� � �
� � 4 � ' � �'° �!��-°c� J� .�� . � �� r� I � � �
� �
__ _��lu � � � ,�� ��s
i � _� ��p �� _�— 'y �
I� � . y � + _ .`T � � � '4 �
s __�r
. . r"1�Y �,. � .�� ei� ,�,��,��� _�I � � . � � �, , . �
...
� ��� �
. , .. . .
�_�?.,I; �. +�� . � ._� '�f/Iyv� �_" p . � �L. , , I � I i
L �, _ `
'—.�� •'� ,,11 ,�� �_�� _�� � � •� , - �,�. � .. — I � YsIC;:�I�E ,.
- - � � ��-r a • � -„ . -
. ��,� � ,� -� 4 _� � .�� -�_- �
.Tr:�--� � - '��I"I�"l
i_�r � , � I llk4`7RiW J!_ . . . .
,� �
. � A6'�M AIE � .c=:- q 1� � � � '- ,�e � {� � `'
_ ,e^~� I Y � � .t� -� `� � � � � � � � � ,��--s—
111 2R � - �.e
_...... . �. ' '.- . z . . y�
� �
� —�� _ "� _ �. � �� i� p�l � � � � +� �YAiE . _ _-��• _- �. �
. , � � � �
� , ! I� ,@_ � .� i �r�� � �
a —
. _ . R .. I a AqpIpN11YAIE . _ . � �� .
— u
��
_ _ ._ g . � . - � _A� � . .' _. r-.._ � I�I �11�IE�d� � 1W"' �•� � � �
I
i i�, -I � _ � � � ��� � t� '++ — 9p1616fEAi6
� ,�;,s
�a ' � � � � �� °P°�� y m � ' �' � `� ` � 4AV AIE " .
. ,� �F� . �
�
. , �.�� .
� � � � � � � -
� ��� � � � �i
_ — � —_---- .�4 sm Al � AIL � � a � �,►AyE: �.
�{ � E� � fRl � � � I
, , - �. ::��� �er a�x� • � �+rta�"re:+a �' � • �— � � I� ` � e
I.1 !— � — _ � � s �
�s�,�=.�� � '� r d�mwi� � �..
.! � � � 3� � ��+��� �t - , •
� ,�� I..-� � �: W � �
° — `� 4t" 4A!A� ' ` ''� Y° �
.� °-' I �' I__ �,�--L I�yi—�_�'�;I � I � 4�, ��-I
� �� '!�.� �� — ����' � ' ' I�
������ - _ � -v�,i��� A��h':klr -
If�'1�A 1E T � "�
* T f� ' � �
. , q
'
,�
i �-°�'��� �J� ,�.� p� i -- � X � !� �6 � � �- v'�.� . � � 'r _ �•� .
��� � d
.�.�`��-'� � � �.� � � � �_I . �I. �� } `��°. � � �����P�. �- � �' q
� ', .. :Pfi�I nS~..
+ l i �
�, � � ,,-.,,,� ��'�, .a.�:��. . '
��.��.� �', � �J ��� �`��,� � --� � "�P�R�
k�� � �' � .� � - o_ COLLECTORS AND
i— , y �.�"`�f. � . ". I. � -- - !I ��-, �� LEGEND ARTERIALS
� � � ��F � �' ,��—� � .H�/I�lY� � �� –�
, � ;m,p�� � � L❑CAL RDADS
,�� ,� . �� �
PROPOSED BUSINESS �
� _��_— ` _:, ,,� RDUTE
I � �.��..-a..�;}, � � _ � , _-� �' �r
� ���— � � :. �—
I `� `_ � I- � ' � � �����--- RETURN TO FREEWAY �
�� 1 � i�'� �! SIGN
�� �-� �I p,� � _ " ,-._ � � � ! �.� _.-�
I— T , `�f �.,�..�_� _. I i . � �4: `� BIJSINESS R�UTE eo
-I_,'-���I �� '-'�._� � cj1. _ -: �-g -��I � �� TRAILBLAIER �
��'- �— y — 'T�' '"�"�� "� f� I-90 ExIT NUMBER
, � rL � _.
��.,� � r, `» �� _
, _ � ., , .E . e � � _. � I �1�-_ y�� r' -�—
,
PLOi WIIE 70 2 FlLE Na:
N0. 0�. ey c� � �, �rawn By. IN �ate: ia z Clty of Spokt�ne VpIIBy SPOKANE VALLEY PROJEGT No. SHEET
Designed By: �ate: ,o z Department of Public Works �,T,��
SCALE 11707 E. 5progue A�e. 5uite 106 Sp���.ne city af 5pakane Valley
HflRIZflNTAL: r-�,eocr SP�KANE VALLEY, WA. 9920fi � 1 of 1
VERIICAL: �� (5a9) 921-1��4 ��� I-9❑ BUSINESS ROUTE PROP05AL — —
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: November 13, 2012 Department Director Approval: �
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ Old business � New business ❑ Public Hearing
❑ Information ❑Admin. Report❑ Pending Legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: MOTION CONSIDERATION: 2013 Annual Comprehensive Plan
Amendment (CPA) Docket
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: The Growth Management Act (GMA) RCW 36.70A.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None.
BACKGROUND: The Growth Management Act (GMA) allows local jurisdictions to update
comprehensive plans no more than once each year. The City codified this process in Section
17.80.140 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). Consistent with state law and the
SVMC, staff published notices at the end of August advising the public of the annual
amendment process and that the City would be accepting applications for the 2013 cycle
through November 1, 2012. Notice was also posted in the main reception area of City Hall, the
Permit Center and at the Valley Library.
Comprehensive Plan Amendments are divided into two categories - map amendments and text
amendments (including charts, tables and graphics). Comprehensive Plan amendments may
be privately initiated or proposed by City staff. Most privately initiated amendments deal with
land use changes.
City initiated text amendments for 2013 will be limited to changes to Chapter 2: Land Use,
Chapter 3: Transportation, Chapter 4: Capital Facilities, Chapter 7: Economic Development,
Chapter 10: Neighborhoods, and Chapter 11: Bike and Pedestrian. It is critical to update the
Transportation and Capital Facilities elements annually due to GMA requirements for
concurrency and for certain funding sources, such as Real Estate Excise Tax (REET). REET
money can only be used for capital projects that are identified in the City's Comprehensive Plan.
City initiated map amendment for 2013 include evaluating the split zoning classifications north of
Trent Avenue between McDonald Road and Blake Road. The City will also consider
reclassifying property located east of Eastern Road, north of Park Road, and south of Interstate
90, from Office to Community Commercial.
The City has received two privately initiated comprehensive plan site-specific map amendments.
On October 23, 2012 City Council requested the following items be added to the 2013 docket.
- Chapter 2 - Land Use: analyze and potentially modify Map 2.1to ensure there are
sufficient locations for multi-family development; add policy language to support the use
of office in multifamily zones.
- Chapter 3 - Transportation: add policy language to support the City's pavement
management strategy.
- Chapter 7 - Economic Development: add policies/goals to support AutoRow.
- Chapter 10 - Neighborhoods: add policy language for food access at a neighborhood
level such as community gardens as a possible use of open space to develop a sense of
community and the support of small grocery stores in neighborhoods.
- Chapter 11 - add policy language supporting the use of Community Development Block
Grants (CDBG) funding for sidewalks in low income neighborhoods; add an extension to
connect newly purchased City property to the City's bike and pedestrian network.
OPTIONS: Approve or not approve the proposed 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Docket
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve the 2013 Comprehensive Plan
Amendment Docket
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A.
STAFF CONTACT: John Hohman, P.E., Community Development Director
Mike Basinger, AICP, Senior Planner
Attachment: 2013 CPA Docket
Exhibit 1
City of Spokane Valley
2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket
PRIVATELY INITIATED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
File Number Ma or Text Summar of Amendment
CPA-01-13 Map 2.1 Parcel 45143.1328, LDR to GO
CPA-02-13 Ma 2.1 Parcel 55181.2604, LDR to HDR
CITY INITIATED COMPRENSIVE PLAN SITE SPECIFIC MAP AMENDMENTS
File Number Map Summary of Amendment
CPA-03-13 Map 2.1 Parcels 35231.0603, 35231.9106, 35242.9010,
35242.9011, & 35242.9012, O to CC
CPA-04-13 Map 2.1 Reevaluate the split zoning north of Trent Avenue
between McDonald Road and Blake Road
CITY INITIATED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AND MAP AMENDMENTS
File Number Map or Text Summary of Amendment
CPA-05-13 Text Chapter 2 — Land Use: Analyze and potentially modify
Map 2.1 Map 2.1 to ensure there are sufficient locations for
multi-family development; add policy language to
support the use of office in multifamily zones.
CPA-06-13 Text Chapter 3 —Transportation: include transportation
Map 3.1 improvements developed in the 2012 development
cycle; update 3.4 Transit section; add policy language
to support the City's pavement management strategy.
CPA-07-13 Text Chapter 4 —Capital Facilities and Public Services:
Map 4.2 update 6-year TIP; ensure City capital projects, such
as parks and other public facilities are included to
utilize REET funding; update Table 4.36 Intersection
LOS Analysis.
CPA-08-13 Text Chapter 7 — Economic Development: update text and
Map 7.1 Map 7.1 to reflect the latest Development Activity; add
policies/goals to support AutoRow.
CPA-09-13 Text Chapter 10 — Neighborhoods: add policy language for
food access at a neighborhood level such as
community gardens as a possible use of open space
to develop a sense of community and the support of
small rocer stores in nei hborhoods.
CPA-10-13 Text Chapter 11 — Bike and Pedestrian: include bike and
Map 11.1-11.4 pedestrian improvements developed in the 2012
development cycle; add policy language supporting
the use of CDBG funding for sidewalks in low income
neighborhoods; add an extension to connect newly
purchased City property to the City's bike and
edestrian network.
Updated 10/30/2012
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: Nov 13th, 2012 Department Director Approval: ❑
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business � new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Consultant contract for University Road
Overpass Study
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: n/a
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: discussion on 8/24/10, approval of grant application
on 9/21/10, info memo on 10/30/12.
BACKGROUND: In 2010 the City applied for funding to conduct a transportation study of the
industrial and residential area bound by SR-290, SR-27, Argonne Road, and I-90. Although the
title of the project focuses on an overpass at University Road, the study will evaluate other
improvements to alleviate congestion on the Argonne and Pines corridors. It will also look at
improving the overall motorized and non-motorized transportation connections for residents and
busines�es within the study area.
This idea of a University Road overpass has been discussed by WSDOT and SRTC in the past,
but a full evaluation has not been completed.
The project is included in the City's 2012 Budget, the draft 2013 Budget, the 2012-2017 TIP and
the 2013-2018 TIP.
Staff went through the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) consultant selection process and
selected Fehr and Peers as the most highly qualified firm for this work. Staff has also
negotiated a scope and fee with Fehr and Peers. The contract amount is $229,802 which
includes a $20,000 management reserve fund. The remaining funds will be allocated for staff
time.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Motion to authorize the City Manager to finalize and
execute the contract with Fehr and Peers in an amount not to exceed $229,802, for the
University Road Overpass Study.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
Project Revenues: Estimated Project Expenditures:
CMAQ Grant $ 216,000 PE - Consultant contract $ 229,802
City Match $ 33,711 PE - Staff time $ 19,909
Other Fundinq $ — $ —
Total Funds Available $ 249,711 Total Est. Expenditures $ 249,711
STAFF CONTACT: Inga Note, Senior Traffic Engineer; Eric Guth, Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS: Draft Contract, Scope of Work, Estimate, Map
Local Agency ConsultanUAddresslfelephone
Fehr and Peers
Standard Consultant 1001 4thAvenue, Suite4120
Agreement Seattle,WA98154
�Architectural/Engineering Agreement
❑ Personal Services Agreement
A reement Number (206) 576-4220
Project Title And Work Description
Federal Aid Number University Road Overpass Study
STPUL-9932(042)
Agreement Type(Choose one) Analyze the transportation system in the area bound
by I-90, SR-290, SR-27 and Argonne Road using
❑ Lump Sum future traffic volumes. Evaluate a list of
Lump Sum Amount $ improvements including both a non-motorized and
� Cost Plus Fixed Fee vehicular overpass at University Road.
Overhead Progress Payment Rate %
Overhead Cost Method DBE Participation
❑Actual Cost ❑Yes � No % I
Federal ID Number or S�ia1 y�e���,Lumber
❑Actual Cost Not To Exceed % r{tuH�, u
REDACTED o (Rcw' g2.3z_3�0�
� Fixed Overhead Rate /o Do you require a 1099 for IRS? Completion Date
Fixed Fee $ ���u S�1 l?���F)� ❑Yes ❑ No
❑Specific Rates Of Pay Total Amount Authorized $ 209,802.00
❑ Negotiated Hourly Rate
Management Reserve Fund $ 20,000.00
❑ Provisional Hourly Rate
❑ Cost Per Unit of Work Maximum Amount Payable$ 229,802.00
Index of Exhibits (Check all that apply):
�Exhibit A-1 Scope of Work ❑Exhibit G-2 Fee-Sub Specific Rates
❑Exhibit A-2 Task Order Agreement �Exhibit G-3 Sub Overhead Cost
❑Exhibit B-1 DBE Utilization Certification �Exhibit H Title VI Assurances
�Exhibit C Electronic Exchange of Data �Exhibit I Payment Upon Termination of Agreement
❑Exhibit D-1 Payment-Lump Sum �Exhibit J Alleged Consultant Design Errar Procedures
�Exhibit D-2 Payment-Cost Plus �Exhibit K Consultant Claim Procedures
❑ Exhibit D-3 Payment-Hourly Rate ❑Exhibit L Liability Insurance Increase
❑Exhibit D-4 Payment-Provisional �Exhibit M-la Consultant Certification
�Eachibit E-1 Fee-Lump/Fixed/LTnit �Exhibit M-lb Agency Official Certification
❑Exhibit E-2 Fee-Specific Rates �Exhibit M-2 Certification-Priruary
�Exhibit F Overhead Cost �Exhibit M-3 Lobbying Certification
�Exhibit G Subcontracted Wark ❑Exhibit M-4 Pricing Data Certification
�E�ibit G-1 Subconsultant Fee ❑App.31.910 Supplemental Signature Page
THIS AGREEMENT,made and entered into this day of November , 2012 ,
between the Local Agency of City of Spokane Valley ,Washington,hereinafter called the"AGENCY",
and the above organization hereinafter called the"CONSULTANT".
DOT Form 14o-oe9 EF Page 1 of 8
Revised 3/2008
WITNESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS,the AGENCY desires to accomplish the above referenced project,and
WHEREAS,the AGENCY does not have sufficient staff to meet the required commitment and therefore deems it
advisable and desirable to engage the assistance of a CONSULTANT to provide the necessary services for the PROJECT;
and
WHEREAS,the CONSULTANT represents that he/she is in compliance with the Washington State Statutes relating to
professional registration,if applicable,and has signified a willingness to furnish Consulting services to the AGENCY,
NOW THEREFORE,in consideration of the terms,conditions,covenants and performance contained herein,or attached
and incorporated and made a part hereof,the parties hereto agree as follows:
I General Description of Work
The work under this AGREEMENT shall consist of the above described work and services as herein defined and
necessary to accomplish the completed work for this PROJECT.The CONSULTANT shall furnish all services,labor,and
related equipment necessary to conduct and complete the wark as designated elsewhere in this AGREEMENT. '
II Scope of Work
The Scope of Work and projected level of effort required for this PROJECT is detailed in E�ibit"A"attached hereto and
by this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT. ,
III General Requirements �
All aspects of coordination of the work of this AGREEMENT with outside agencies,groups,or individuals shall receive
advance approval by the AGENCY.Necessary contacts and meetings with agencies,groups,and/or individuals shall be ',
coordinated through the AGENCY.The CONSULTANT shall attend coordination,progress and presentation meetings
with the AGENCY and/or such Federal,State,Community,City or County officials,groups or individuals as may be
requested by the AGENCY.The AGENCY will provide the CONSiTLTANT sufficient notice prior to meetings requiring ,
CONSULTANT participation.The minimum required hours or days notice shall be agreed to between the AGENCY and �
the CONSiTLTANT and shown in E�ibit"A."
The CONSiTLTANT shall prepare a monthly progress report,in a form approved by the AGENCY,which will outline in
written and graphical form the various phases and the order of performance of the work in sufficient detail so that the
progress of the work can easily be evaluated.
The CONSULTANT,and each SUBCONSULTANT,shall not discriminate on the basis of race,color,national origin,or
sex in the performance of this contract.The CONSULTANT,and each SUBCONSiTLTANT, shall carry out applicable
requirements of 49 CFR Part 26 in the award and administration of USDOT-assisted contracts.Failure by the
CONSULTANT to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this AGREEMENT that may result in the
termination of this AGREEMENT.
Participation for Disadvantaged Business Enterprises(DBE),if required,per 49 CFR Part 26,or participation of Minority
Business Enterprises(MBE),and Women Business Enterprises(WBE),shall be shown on the heading of this
AGREEMENT.If D/M/WBE firms are utilized,the amounts authorized to each firm and their certification number will be
shown on E�ibit"B"attached hereto and by this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT.If the Prime
CONSULTANT is a DBE firm they must comply with the Commercial Useful Function(CUF)regulation outlined in the
AGENCY'S"DBE Program Participation Plan".The mandatory DBE participation goals of the AGREEMENT are those
established by the WSDOT'S Highway and Local Programs Project Development Engineer in consultation with the
AGENCY.
All Reports,PS&E materials,and other data furnished to the CONSULTANT by the AGENCY shall be returned.All
electronic files,prepared by the CONSULTANT,must meet the requirements as outlined in E�chibit"C."
All designs,drawings,specifications,documents,and other work products,including all electronic files,prepared by the
CONSULTANT prior to completion or termination of this AGREEMENT are instruments of service for this PROJECT,
and are the property of the AGENCY.Reuse by the AGENCY or by others,acting through or on behalf of the AGENCY
of any such instruments of service,not occurring as a part of this PROJECT,shall be without liability or legal exposure to
the CONSULTANT.
Page 2 of S
IV Time for Beginning and Completion
The CONSULTANT shall not begin any work under the terms of this AGREEMENT until authorized in writing by the
AGENCY.
All work under this AGREEMENT shall be completed by the date shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT under
completion date.
The established completion time shall not be extended because of any delays attributable to the CONSULTANT,but
may be extended by the AGENCY in the event of a delay attributable to the AGENCY,or because of unavoidable
delays caused by an act of GOD or governmental actions or other conditions beyond the control of the
CONSULTANT.A prior supplemental agreement issued by the AGENCY is required to extend the established
completion time.
V Payment Provisions
The CONSULTANT shall be paid by the AGENCY for completed work and services rendered under this
AGREEMENT as provided in Exhibit"D"attached hereto,and by reference made part of this AGREEMENT. Such
payment shall be full compensation for work performed or services rendered and for all labor,materials,supplies,
equipment,and incidentals necessary to complete the work.The CONSULTANT shall conform to all applicable
portions of 48 CFR Part 31.
A post audit may be performed on this AGREEMENT.The need for a post audit will be determined by the State
Auditor,WSDOT External Audit Office and/or at the request of the AGENCY'S PROJECT Manager.
VI Sub-Contracting
The AGENCY permits sub-contracts for those items of work as shown in Exhibit"G"attached hereto and by this
reference made part of this AGREEMENT.
Compensation for this sub-consultant work shall be based on the cost factors shown on E�ibit"G."
The work of the sub-consultant shall not exceed its maximum amount payable unless a prior written approval has been
issued by the AGENCY.
All reimbursable direct labor,overhead,direct non-salary costs and fixed fee costs for the sub-consultant shall be
substantiated in the same manner as outlined in Section V.All sub-contracts shall contain all applicable provisions of
this AGREEMENT.
With respect to sub-consultant payment,the CONSLTLTANT shall comply with all applic�ble sections of the Prompt
Payment laws as set forth in RCW 39.04.250 and RCW 39.76.011.
The CONSLTLTANT shall not sub-contract for the performance of any work under this AGREEMENT without prior
written permission of the AGENCY.No permission for sub-contracting shall create,between the AGENCY and sub-
contractor,any contract or any other relationship.A DBE certified sub-consultant is required to perform a minimum
amount of their sub-contracted agreement that is established by the WSDOT Highways and Local Programs Project
Development Engineer in consultation with the AGENCY.
VII Employment
The CONSLTLTANT warrants that they have not employed or retained any company or person,other than a bona fide
employee working solely for the CONSLTLTANT,to solicit or secure this contract,and that it has not paid or agreed to
pay any company or person,other than a bona fide employee working solely for the CONSULTANT,any fee,
commission,percentage,brokerage fee,gift,or any other consideration,contingent upon or resulting from the award or
making of this contract.For breach or violation of this warrant,the AGENCY shall have the right to annul this
AGREEMENT without liability or,in its discretion,to deduct from the AGREEMENT price or consideration or
otherwise recover the full amount of such fee,commission,percentage,brokerage fee,gift,or contingent fee.
Any and all employees of the CONSLTLTANT or other persons while engaged in the performance of any work or
services required of the CONSULTANT under this AGREEMENT,shall be considered employees of the
CONSULTANT only and not of the AGENCY,and any and all claims that may arise under any Workmen's
Compensation Act on behalf of said employees or other persons while so engaged,and any and all claims made by a
' Page 3 of 8
third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of the CONSLTLTANT'S employees or other persons
while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein,shall be the sole obligation and
responsibility of the CONSLTLTANT.
The CONSLTLTANT shall not engage,on a full-or part-time basis,or other basis,during the period of the contract,any
professional or technical personnel who are,or have been,at any time during the period of the contract,in the employ
of the United States Deparhnent of Transportation,or the STATE,or the AGENCY,except regularly retired
employees,without written consent of the public employer of such person.
VIII Nondiscrimination
During the performance of this contract,the CONSLTLTANT,far itself,its assignees,and successars in interest agrees
to comply with the following laws and regulations:
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
(42 USC Chapter 21 Subchapter V Section 2000d through 2000d-4a)
Federal-aid Highway Act of 1973
(23 USC Chapter 3 Section 324)
Rehabilitation Act of 1973 '
(29 USC Chapter 16 Subchapter V Section 794)
Age Discrimination Act of 1975
(42 USC Chapter 76 Section 6101 et seq.)
Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987
(Public Law 100-259)
American with Disabilities Act of 1990
(42 USC Chapter 126 Section 12101 et. seq.)
49 CFR Part 21
23 CFR Part 200
RCW 49.60.180
In relation to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,the CONSLTLTANT is bound by the provisions of E�chibit"H"
attached hereto and by this reference made part of this AGREEMENT,and shall include the attached E�chibit"H"in
every sub-contract,including procurement of materials and leases of equipment,unless exempt by the Regulations or
directives issued pursuant thereto.
IX Termination of Agreement
The right is reserved by the AGENCY to terminate this AGREEMENT at any time upon ten(10)days written notice to
the CONSLTLTANT.
In the event this AGREEMENT is terminated by the AGENCY other than for default on the part of the
CONSLTLTANT,a fmal payment shall be made to the CONSLTLTANT as shown in E�chibit"I"for the type of
AGREEMENT used.
No payment shall be made for any work completed after ten(10)days following receipt by the CONSLTLTANT of the
Notice to Terminate.If the accumulated payment made to the CONSLTLTANT prior to Notice of Termination exceeds
the total amount that would be due when computed as set forth herein above,then no fmal payment shall be due and the
CONSLTLTANT shall imtnediately reimburse the AGENCY far any excess paid.
If the services of the CONSLTLTANT are terminated by the AGENCY for default on the part of the CONSLTLTANT,
the above formula for payment shall not apply.
Page 4 of 8
In such an event,the amount to be paid shall be determined by the AGENCY with consideration given to the actual
costs incurred by the CONSULTANT in performing the work to the date of termination,the amount of work ariginally
required which was satisfactorily completed to date of termination,whether that work is in a form or a type which is
usable to the AGENCY at the time of termination,the cost to the AGENCY of employing another firm to complete the
work required and the time which may be required to do so,and other factors which affect the value to the AGENCY
of the work performed at the time of termination.
Under no circumstances shall payment made under this subsection exceed the amount,which would have been made
using the formula set forth above.
If it is determined far any reason that the CONSULTANT was not in default or that the CONSULTANT'S failure to
perform is without the CONSULTANT'S or it's employee's default or negligence,the termination shall be deemed to
be a termination for the convenience of the AGENCY.In such an event,the CONSULTANT would be reimbursed for
actual costs in accordance with the termination for other than default clauses listed previously.
In the event of the death of any member,partner or officer of the CONSULTANT or any of its supervisory personnel
assigned to the PROJECT,or dissolution of the partnership,termination of the corporation,or disaffiliation of the
principally involved employee,the surviving members of the CONSULTANT hereby agree to complete the work under
the terms of this AGREEMENT,if requested to do so by the AGENCY.This subsection shall not be a bar to
renegotiation of the AGREEMENT between the surviving members of the CONSULTANT and the AGENCY,if the
AGENCY so chooses.
In the event of the death of any of the parties listed in the previous paragraph,should the surviving members of the
CONSULTANT,with the AGENCY'S concurrence,desire to terminate this AGREEMENT,payment shall be made as
set forth in the second paragraph of this section.
Payment for any part of the wark by the AGENCY shall not constitute a waiver by the AGENCY of any remedies of
any type it may have against the CONSLTLTANT for any breach of this AGREEMENT by the CONSLTLTANT,or for
failure of the CONSULTANT to perform work required of it by the AGENCY.Farbearance of any rights under the
AGREEMENT will not constitute waiver of entitlement to exercise those rights with respect to any future act ar
omission by the CONSLTLTANT.
X Changes of Work
The CONSULTANT shall make such changes and revisions in the complete work of this AGREEMENT as necessary
to correct errors appearing therein,when required to do so by the AGENCY,without additional compensation thereof.
Should the AGENCY fmd it desirable for its own purposes to have previously satisfactorily completed work or parts
thereof changed or revised,the CONSLTLTANT shall make such revisions as directed by the AGENCY.This work
shall be considered as E�ctra Work and will be paid for as herein provided under Section XIV.
XI Disputes
Any dispute concerning questions of fact in connection with the work not disposed of by AGREEMENT beriveen the
CONSULTANT and the AGENCY shall be referred for determination to the Director of Public Works ar AGENCY
Engineer,whose decision in the matter shall be fmal and binding on the parties of this AGREEMENT;provided,
however,that if an action is brought challenging the Director of Public Works or AGENCY Engineer's decision,that
decision shall be subject to de novo judicial review.If the parties to this AGREEMENT mutually agree,disputes
concerning alleged design errors will be conducted under the procedures found in E�chibit"J",and disputes concerning
claims will be conducted under the procedures found in Exhibit"K".
XII Venue,Applicable Law, and Personal Jurisdiction
In the event that either party deems it necessary to institute legal action ar proceedings to enforce any right ar
obligation under this AGREEMENT,the parties hereto agree that any such action shall be initiated in the Superior
court of the State of Washington,situated in the county in which the AGENCY is located.The parties hereto agree that
all questions shall be resolved by application of Washington law and that the parties to such action shall have the right
of appeal from such decisions of the Superior court in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington.The
CONSULTANT hereby consents to the personal jurisdiction of the Superior court of the State of Washington,situated
in the county in which the AGENCY is located.
Page 5 of 8
XIII Legal Relations
The CONSiJLTANT shall comply with all Federal,State,and local laws and ordinances applicable to the work to be
done under this AGREEMENT.This contract shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with the laws of the
State of Washington.
The CONSiJLTANT shall indemnify and hold the AGENCY and the STATE and its officers and employees harmless
from and shall process and defend at its own expense all claims,demands,or suits at law or equity arising in whole or
in part from the CONSULTANT'S negligence or breach of any of its obligations under this AGREEMENT;provided
that nothing herein shall require a CONSiTLTANT to indemnify the AGENCY or the STATE against and hold
harmless the AGENCY or the STATE from claims,demands or suits based solely upon the conduct of the AGENCY or
the STATE,their agents,officers and employees;and provided further that if the claims or suits are caused by or result
from the concurrent negligence of(a)the CONSiILTANT'S agents or employees,and(b)the AGENCY or the
STATE,their agents,officers and employees,this indemnity provision with respect to(1)claims or suits based upon
such negligence(2)the costs to the AGENCY or the STATE of defending such claims and suits shall be valid and
enforceable only to the extent of the CONSiJLTANT'S negligence or the negligence of the CONSiJLTANT'S agents
or employees,
The CONSiILTANT'S relation to the AGENCY shall be at all times as an independent contractor.
The CONSULTANT shall comply with all applicable sections of the applicable Ethics laws,including RCW 42.23,
which is the Code of Ethics for regulating contract interest by municipal officers.The CONSULTANT specifically
assumes potential liability for actions brought by the CONSiJLTANT'S own employees against the AGENCY and,
solely for the purpose of this indemnification and defense,the CONSiJLTANT specifically waives any unmunity under
the state industrial insurance law,Title 51 RCW.
Unless otherwise specified'm the AGREEMENT,the AGENCY shall be responsible for administration of construction
contracts,if any,on the PROJECT. Subject to the processing of a new sole source,or an acceptable supplemental
agreement,the CONSiTLTANT shall provide On-Call assistance to the AGENCY during contract administration.By
providing such assistance,the CONSiTLTANT shall assume no responsibility for:proper construction techniques,job
site safety,or any construction contractor's failure to perform its work in accordance with the contract documents.
The CONSiJLTANT shall obtain and keep in force during the terms of the AGREEMENT,or as otherwise required,
the following insurance with companies or through sources approved by the State Insurance Commissioner pursuant to
Title 48 RCW.
Insurance Coverage
A.Worker's compensation and employer's liability insurance as required by the STATE.
B. Commercial general liability and property damage insurance in an aggregate amount not less than two million
dollars($2,000,000)for bodily injury,including death and property damage.The per occurrence amount shall
not exceed one million dollars($1,000,000).
C.Vehicle liability insurance for any automobile used in an amount not less than a one million dollar($1,000,000)
combined single limit.
Excepting the Worker's Compensation Insurance and any Professional Liability Insurance secured by the
CONSiJLTANT,the AGENCY will be named on all policies as an additional insured.The CONSiILTANT shall
furnish the AGENCY with verification of insurance and endorsements required by the AGREEMENT.The AGENCY
reserves the right to require complete,certified copies of all required insurance policies at any time.
All insurance shall be obtained from an insurance company authorized to do business in the State of Washington.The
CONSiTLTANT shall submit a verification of insurance as outlined above within fourteen(14)days of the execution of
this AGREEMENT to the AGENCY.
No cancellation of the foregoing policies shall be effective without thirty(30)days prior notice to the AGENCY.
The CONSiJLTANT'S professional liability to the AGENCY shall be limited to the amount payable under this
AGREEMENT or one million($1,000,000)dollars,whichever is the greater,unless modified by E�chibit"L".In no
case shall the CONSiILTANT'S professional liability to third parties be limited in any way.
Page 6 of 8
The AGENCY will pay no progress payments under Section V until the CONSiTLTANT has fully complied with this
section.This remedy is not exclusive;and the AGENCY and the STATE may take such other action as is available to it
under other provisions of this AGREEMENT,or otherwise in law.
XIV Extra Work
A.The AGENCY may at any time,by written order,make changes within the general scope of the AGREEMENT in
the services to be performed.
B.If any such change causes an increase or decrease in the estimated cost of,or the time required for,performance of
any part of the work under this AGREEMENT,whether or not changed by the order,or otherwise affects any other
terms and conditions of the AGREEMENT,the AGENCY shall make an equitable adjustment in the(1)maximum
amount payable;(2)delivery or completion schedule,or both;and(3)other affected terms and shall modify the
AGREEMENT accordingly.
C.The CONSiTLTANT must submit any"request for equitable adjustment",hereafter referred to as"CLAIM",under
this clause within thirty(30)days from the date of receipt of the written order,However,if the AGENCY decides
that the facts justify it,the AGENCY may receive and act upon a CLA1M submitted before fmal payment of the
AGREEMENT.
D.Failure to agree to any adjustment shall be a dispute under the Disputes clause.However,nothing in this clause
shall excuse the CONSiTLTANT from proceeding with the AGREEMENT as changed.
E.Notwithstanding the terms and conditions of paragraphs(A)and(B)above,the maximum amount payable for this
AGREEMENT,shall not be increased or considered to be increased except by specific written supplement to this
AGREEMENT.
XV Endorsement of Plans
If applicable,the CONSiTLTANT shall place their endorsement on all plans,estimates,or any other engineering data
furnished by them.
XVI Federal and State Review
The Federal Highway Administration and the Washington State Department of Transportation shall have the right to
participate in the review or examination of the work in progress.
XVII Certification of the Consultant and the Agency
Attached hereto as Exhibit"M-1(a and b)"are the Certifications of the CONSiTLTANT and the AGENCY,E�ibit"M
-2"Certification Regarding Debarment,Suspension and Other Responsibility Matters-Primary Covered Transactions,
E�ibit"M-3"Certification Regarding the Restrictions of the Use of Federal F�nds for Lobbying and E�ibit"M-4"
Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data.Exhibit"M-3"is required only in AGREEMENTS over$100,000 and
E�ibit"M-4"is required only in AGREEMENTS over$500,000.
XVIII Complete Agreement
This document and referenced attachments contain all covenants,stipulations,and provisions agreed upon by the
parties.No agent,or representative of either party has authority to make,and the parties shall not be bound by or be
liable for,any statement,representation,promise or agreement not set forth herein.No changes,amendments,or
modifications of the terms hereof shall be valid unless reduced to writing and signed by the parties as an amendment to
this AGREEMENT.
XIX Execution and Acceptance
This AGREEMENT may be simultaneously executed in several counterparts,each of which shall be deemed to be an
original having identical legal effect,The CONSLTLTANT does hereby ratify and adopt all statements,representations,
warranties,covenants,and agreements contained in the proposal,and the supporting material submitted by the
CONSLTLTANT,and does hereby accept the AGREEMENT and agrees to all of the terms and conditions thereof.
Page 7 of 8
In witness whereof, the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT as of the day and year shown in the
"Execution Date" box on page one(1) of this AGREEMENT.
By By
consu�tant Fehr and Peers Agency City of Spokane Valley
DOT Form 140-089 EF
Revised 3/2008 Page 8 of 8
Exhibit A-1
University Road Overpass Project: Draft Scope of Work
This documents our team's draft scope of work for the University Road Overpass
project.This scope is intended to be fairly detailed to assist in understanding how
we are proposing to work through the project; however,we recognize that this
scope will need to adapt to the project as it evolves.
Task 1: Kick-Off Meeting
As an initial task,we recommend a kickoff ineeting be held to review the project
objectives, clarify alternative evaluation criteria,identify stakeholders and potential
project/technical advisory committee members, and tour the study area with City
staff. Soon after this task,the project website will go live.
Deliverable:Meeting minutes summarizing outcomes and action items. Project website
up and running.
Task 2: Transportation Data Collection
Concurrent with Task 1,the Fehr&Peers team will develop a comprehensive data
collection plan for the study area.As part of this effort,we plan on collecting
comprehensive transportation data including AM and PM peak period intersection
turning movement counts,pedestrian and bicycle counts, roadway and intersection
geometries, speeds,an inventory of pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and cell phone
origin-destination data.To the extent that recent data are available,we will utilize
the information in the City's Synchro model and any relevant counts that may have
been collected as part of other studies in the area.The proposed study area and
intersections are shown in Figure 1.
Deliverable: Raw data files. Description of data collection results will be incorporated
into the Existing Conditions Memorandum described in Task 4.
Task 3: Land Use,Utility, and Agency Planning Data Collection
The Fehr&Peers team will collect data on utility locations and providers,property
ownership,special generators (schools, parks, etc.),WSDOT infrastructure, and
right-of-way limits near the probable overpass locations within the study area. In
addition,we will review and document plans for new infrastructure in the area
including utilities (transmission lines,water/sewer/purple pipe),railroad projects,
park plans, and WSDOT plans.
Deliverable:Description of these findings will be incorporated into the Existing
Conditions Memorandum described in Task 4.
Task 4: Existing Conditions Analysis
The project team will use Synchro to analyze existing traffic conditions at the study
intersections within the study area. Based on the LOS threshold defined in the City's
comprehensive plan, deficiencies will be identified.Transit operations will be
described at a qualitative level based on the traffic analysis results and discussions
with SRTC Staff. Pedestrian and bicycle facility deficiencies will be described and
mapped based on our field review of the study area.We will also perform a safety
assessment using data from WSDOT.We will identify intersections and roadway
segments that have higher than average vehicle collision rates and any locations
that have pedestrian/bicycle collisions in the last five years. Using the cell phone
based OD data described above,we will evaluate travel patterns in the study area.
We anticipate that this OD data will be able to differentiate between relatively short
trips that could be made by walking or cycling, and longer trips that are more likely
to be made by car. In addition to evaluating the OD patterns within the study area,
we will also evaluate the travel patterns in an area of the City that features better
connections to determine if there is any latent demand for shorter trips.
Deliverable:Existing Conditions Memorandum describing the results of the data
collection and multimodal transportation analysis. Memo will include maps and
�gures to make it easier for thegeneral public to understand the�ndings. This memo
will be posted on the project website.
Task 5: Planning Charrette and Stakeholder Outreach
Based on the results of the kick-off ineeting,the team will finalize the list of
stakeholders and the TAC.With these groups identified we will hold interviews with
the stakeholders to understand their principle issues related to the proposed
project. In addition,we will work with the City to develop an email distribution list
so that we can provide interested parties with updates and information about
meetings.
We envision a workshop with the technical advisory committee where mobility
improvement ideas will be brainstormed.We have found these focused group
planning efforts to be very successful in developing an array of viable alternatives,
some of which may not have been otherwise considered. ln addition,we plan on
holding an initial planning charrette with members of the public to gather input on
existing conditions that hinder multimodal access in the study area.At this
charrette,we will also solicit public input on potential solutions to make the area
more attractive to walking and cycling.
Deliverables:Stakeholder interviews, email distribution list, TAC mobility concept
workshop,public planning charrette.Memorandum summarizing outcomes of the
interviews, workshop, and planning charrette. Website status update.
Task 6: Travel Forecasting and Preliminary Alternatives Screening
The Fehr&Peers team will prepare a comprehensive set of multimodal travel
forecasts for a future year to be determined in consultation with City staff.The
travel forecasts will rely on a combination of tools including the SRTC regional
travel model, Fehr&Peers' pedestrian and trail user trip generation tools, and the
cell phone OD data. Note that we will account for special generators like Splashdown
and Mission Park in our forecasts to the extent that they are modeled by our tools.
As part of this task,we envision developing future travel forecasts for up to five
preliminary alternatives developed in the previous task.These preliminary
forecasts will focus on a limited number of time periods (e.g., PM peak hour
conditions for preliminary traffic analysis and daily conditions for
pedestrian/bicycle demand analysis) to be used in screening the viability of the
alternatives.The screening will take place at a planning-level and will use concepts
like roadway segment or intersection volume/capacity ratios, desire line analysis
for active transportation modes, and qualitative environmental impact/cost
assessments.
After this initial round of screening,the team will develop a more detailed set of
travel forecasts for up to three or four alternatives that best meet the objectives
defined in Task 1.These more detailed forecasts will include AM and PM peak hour
intersection turning movements, daily trail user/pedestrian volume estimates, and
trail/road crossing volumes at key locations.
Deliverables; Travel demand forecasting memo summarizing methods, assumptions,
and results. Updated project website.
Task 7: Preliminary Alternatives Evaluation
Based on the results of the travel forecasts above,the Fehr&Peers team will
perform a planning-level evaluation of up to four preliminary alternatives.This
evaluation will include a roadway link-level volume/capacity analysis.The team will
describe the expected levels of bicycle and pedestrian travel for each of the
alternatives. In addition,we will describe how the alternatives interface with the
regional trail network and the existing bicycle facilities to the south of I-90.Also,the
project team will assess potential environmental impacts using a SEPA checklist,
identify likely FHWA/WSDOT permits, identify right-of-way constraints,and
coordinate with the railroads on any potential or perceived conflict.
Deliverables:Preliminary alternatives analysis results memo, ln addition to technical
results, the memo will present a list of probable permits,potential constraints to
implementing the project, and potential actions to work through the constraints.
Updated project website.
Task 8: Preferred Alternatives Selection
Based on the results of Task 8,the team will work with City staff to identify one or
two preferred alternatives.Through this preferred alternatives selection process, it
is anticipated that the initial alternatives evaluated as part of Task 7 will be refined
to better meet the mobility and safety objective for the project. In addition to
updated traffic operations (Synchro analysis as described in Task 4),
pedestrian/trail forecasts, and environmental checklist,the team will prepare a
preliminary design sufficient for estimating planning-level costs for the preferred
alternative(s) improvements.The preferred alternatives analysis will also include
additional analysis to improve overall mobility in the study area, including VISSIM
simulations of the Argonne Road and Pines Road corridors near the I-90
interchanges to test different signal timing plans.We plan on developing a
graphically-rich memorandum to better explain the benefits and trade-offs of the
preferred alternatives.
Deliverables; Updated environmental checklist,Synchro analysis, trail user forecast,
conceptual design sketches,planning-level cost estimates, VISSIM model ofArgonne
and Pines Road corridors, updated signal timing plans. Results will be compiled into a
technical memo. Updated project website. Presentation to City staff and TAC.
Task 9: Preferred Alternatives Outreach
After the preferred alternative(s) are selected,the team will hold another public
workshop to describe the improvements, go over the analysis results, and
summarize the rationale for selecting the preferred alternative(s).
Deliverables:Public workshop to describe preferred alternative(s) and to solicit input.
Updated project website.
Task 10: Documentation
The results of the tasks described above will be compiled into a complete project
report. Our approach of developing interim memos as the project progresses will
assist in the final reporting since much of the material will be familiar to City staff
and the review period can be reduced. It is envisioned that this report will contain
nearly all of the relevant input data for a Type, Size, and Location report to justify a
new overpass and seek funding from state and federal sources.
We will submit a draft report to City staff for review.We anticipate responding to
one round of comments from staff.We will incorporate the comments into a final
report.
Deliverables:Draft report, response to comments,�nal report.
Task 11: Presentation of Findings to City Council and Planning Commission
We anticipate presenting the findings of the preferred alternative(s) analysis to the
City Council and Planning Commission for their review. In working with City staff,
we will determine if any interim presentations are warranted.
Deliverables:Meetings and presentation materials to show results to the Spokane
Valley Planning Commission and City Council.
Task 12: WSDOT/FHWA Documentation
Based on the outcome of the preferred alternative(s) selection,we will prepare the
appropriate documentation for WSDOT. Documentation could include an .
Interchange Justification Report,a Permanent Limited Access Break Request,
Methods and Assumptions Report, and appropriate environmental documentation.
In general,these documents will represent repackaged versions of our earlier
memos.
Deliverables:Methods and Assumptions Report, Limited Access Break Request.
Task 13: Project Management
We feel that successful project management begins with routine check-ins within
the consulting team and with the City project manager.To this end,we will hold bi-
weekly project conference calls and bi-weekly status update calls with City staff.
Fehr&Peers' project manager will lead these calls so there will be a single point of
contact both within the team and between the team and the City.We have
successfully used this type of project management structure on many other
similarly complex projects.
Deliverables:Bi-weekly calls with City staff and project team.
Optional Task 14: Type, Size, and Location Report Outline
Depending on the resources available at the end of this project,we can assist City
staff in outlining a Type, Size, and Location Report.This report is important to have
as part of grant applications. If resources are available,we can also assist in grant
applications.
Deliverables: Type,Size, and Location Report outline,grant applications.
' I
i
�
I
Exhibit C
Electronic Exchange of Engineering and Other Data
In this E�ibit the agency,as applicable,is to provide a description of the format and standards the
consultant is to use in preparing electronic files for transmission to the agency.The format and standards to
be provided may include,but are not limited to,the following:
I. Surveying,Roadway Design&Plans Preparation Section
A. Survey Data
B.Roadway Design Files
C. Computer Aided Drafting Files
D. Specify the Agency's Right to Review Product with the Consultant
E. Specify the Electronic Deliverables to Be Provided to the Agency
F. Specify What Agency Furnished Services and Information Is to Be Provided
II. Any Other Electronic Files to Be Provided
III. Methods to Electronically Exchange Data
A.Agency Software Suite
B.Electronic Messaging System
C.File Transfers Format
DOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit C
Revised 6/05
Exhibit D-2
Payment (Cost Plus a Fixed Fee)
The CONSiTLTANT shall be paid by the AGENCY for completed work and services rendered under this
AGREEMENT as provided hereinafter. Such payment shall be full compensation for work performed or
services rendered and for all labor,materials, supplies,equipment, and incidentals necessary to complete the
work specified in Section II,"Scope of Work."The CONSiTLTANT shall conform to all applicable portions of
48 CFR Part 31.
A. Actual Costs:Payment for all consulting services for this PROJECT shall be on the basis of the
CONSiTLTANT'S actual cost plus a fixed fee.The actual cost shall include direct salary cost,
overhead, direct non-salary costs,and fixed fee.
1. Direct Salary Costs: The Direct Salary Cost is the direct salary paid to principals,
professional,technical,and clerical personnel for the time they are productively
engaged in work necessary to fulfill the terms of this AGREEMENT.The
CONSiTLTANT shall maintain support data to verify the direct salary costs billed
to the AGENCY.
2. Overhead Costs: Overhead Costs are those costs other than direct costs,which are
included as such on the books of the CONSiTLTANT in the normal everyday
keeping of its books.Progress payments shall be made at the rate shown in the
heading of this AGREEMENT under"Overhead Progress Payment Rate."Total
overhead payment shall be based on the method shown in the heading of the
AGREEMENT.The two options are explained as follows:
a. Fixed Rate:If this method is indicated in the heading of the AGREEMENT the
AGENCY agrees to reimburse the CONSiTLTANT for overhead at the
percentage rate shown. This rate shall not change during the life of the
AGREEMENT.
b. Actual Cost: If this method is indicated in the heading of the AGREEMENT the
AGENCY agrees to reimburse the CONSiTLTANT the actual overhead costs
verified by audit,up to the Maximum Total Amount Payable,authorized under
this AGREEMENT,when accumulated with all other Actual Costs.
A summary of the CONSiTLTANTS cost estimate and the overhead
computation is shown in E�ibit"E"attached hereto and by this reference made
part of this AGREEMENT.When an Actual Cost method is used,the '
CONSiTLTANT(prime and all sub-consultants)will submit to the AGENCY �
within six(6)months after the end of each firm's fiscal year,an overhead I
schedule in the format required by the AGENCY(cost category,dollar I
expenditures,etc.)for the purpose of adjusting the overhead rate for billing
purposes.It shall be used for the computation of progress payments during the
following year and for retroactively adjusting the previous year's overhead cost
, to reflect the actual rate.
DOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit D-2
Revised 6/OS
Failure to supply this information by either the prime CONSiJLTANT or any of their sub-
consultants shall cause the AGENCY to withhold payment of the billed overhead costs until
such time as the required information is received and an overhead rate for billing purposes is
approved.
The AGENCY, STATE and/or the Federal Government may perform an audit of the
CONSiJLTANT'S books and recards at any time during regular business hours to determine
the actual overhead rate,if they so desire.
3. Direct Non-Salary Costs:Direct Non-Salary Costs will be reimbursed at the Actual Cost to
the CONSULTANT.These charges may include,but are not limited to,the following
items: travel,printing,long distance telephone, supplies,computer charges and sub-
consultant costs.
a. Air or train travel will be reimbursed only to economy class levels unless
otherwise approved by the AGENCY. The CONSiJLTANT shall comply with
the rules and regulations regarding travel costs(excluding air,train,and rental
car costs)in accordance with the AGENCY'S Travel Rules and Procedures.
However,air,train,and rental car costs shall be reimbursed in accordance with
48 CFR Part 31.205-46"Travel Cost
b. The billing for Direct Non-Salary Costs shall include an itemized listing of
the charges directly identifiable wh the PROJECT.
c. The CONSULTANT shall maintain the ariginal supporting documents in their
office. Copies of the original supporting documents shall be supplied to the
AGENCY upon request.
d. All above charges must be necessary for the services provided under this
AGREEMENT.
4. Fixed Fee: The Fixed Fee,which represents the CONSiJLTANT'S profit, is shown in the
heading of this AGREEMENT under Fixed Fee.This amount does not include any
additional Fixed Fee,which could be authorized from the Management Reserve Fund.This
fee is based on the Scope of Wark defined in this AGREEMENT and the estimated person-
hours required to perform the stated Scope of Work.In the event the CONSULTANT
enters into a supplemental AGREEMENT for additional work,the supplemental
AGREEMENT may include provisions for the added costs and an appropriate additional
fee. The Fixed Fee will be prorated and paid monthly in proportion to the percentage of
work completed by the CONSiJLTANT and reported in the Monthly Progress Reports
accompanying the billings.Any portion of the Fixed Fee earned but not previously paid in
the progress payments will be covered in the final payment, subject to the provisions of
Section IX entitled"Termination of Agreement."
5. Management Reserve Fund: The AGENCY may desire to establish a Management Reserve
Fund to provide the Agreement Administrator with the flexibility to authorize additional
funds to the AGREEMENT for allowable unforeseen costs,or reimbursing the
CONSiJLTANT for additional work beyond that already defined in this AGREEMENT.
Such authorization(s)shall be in writing and shall not exceed
the lesser of$100,000 or 10%of the Total Amount Authorized as shown in the heading
of this AGREEMENT. The amount included for the Management Reserve Fund is
shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT. This fund may not be replenished.Any
changes requiring additional costs in excess of the Management Reserve Fund shall be
made in accordance with Section XIV,"Extra Work."6. Maximum Total Amount
Payable: The Maximum Total Amount Payable by the AGENCY to the
CONSiTLTANT under this AGREEMENT shall not exceed the amount shown in the
heading of this AGREEMENT. The Maximum Total Amount Payable is comprised of
the Total Amount Authorized,and the Management Reserve Fund. The Maximum
Total Amount Payable does not include payment for Extra Work as stipulated in
Section XIV,"Extra W,ork."No minimum amount payable is guaranteed under this
AGREEMENT.
B. Monthly Progress Payments: The CONSiTLTANT may submit billings to the AGENCY for
reimbursement of Actual Costs plus the calculated overhead and fee on a monthly basis during the
progress of the work. Such billings shall be in a format approved by the AGENCY and
accompanied by the monthly progress reports required under Section III,"General Requirements"
of this AGREEMENT.The billings will be supported by an itemized listing for each item including
Direct Salary,Direct Non-Salary,and allowable Overhead Costs to which will be added the
prorated Fixed Fee.To provide a means of verifying the billed salary costs for CONSiTLTANT
employees,the AGENCY may conduct employee interviews.These interviews may consist of
recording the names,titles, salary rates,and present duties of those employees performing work on
the PROJECT at the time of the interview.
C. Final Payment: Final Payment of any balance due the CONSiTLTANT of the gross amount earned
will be made promptly upon its verification by the AGENCY after the completion of the work
under this AGREEMENT,contingent upon receipt of all PS&E,plans,maps,notes,reports,
electronic data and other related documents which are required to be furnished under this
AGREEMENT.Acceptance of such Final Payment by the CONSiTLTANT shall constitute a
release of all claims for payment,which the CONSiTLTANT may have against the AGENCY
unless such claims are specifically reserved in writing and transmitted to the AGENCY by the
CONSiTLTANT prior to its acceptance. Said Final Payment shall not,however,be a bar to any
claims that the AGENCY may have against the CONSiTLTANT ar to any remedies the AGENCY
may pursue with respect to such claims.
The payment of any billing will not constitute agreement as to the appropriateness of any item
and at the time of final audit,all required adjustments will be made and reflected in a final payment.
In the event that such final audit reveals an overpayment to the CONSiTLTANT,the
CONSiTLTANT will refund such overpayment to the AGENCY within thirty(30)days of notice of
the overpayment. Such refund shall not constitute a waiver by the CONSiTLTANT for any claims
relating to the validity of a finding by the AGENCY of overpayment.The CONSULTANT has
twenty(20)days after receipt of the final POST AUDIT to begin the appeal process to the
AGENCY for audit findings.
D. Inspection of Cost Records: The CONSiTLTANT and their sub-consultants shall keep available for
inspection by representatives of the AGENCY, STATE and the United States,for a period of three
(3)years after receipt of final payment,the cost records and accounts pertaining to this
AGREEMENT and all items related to or bearing upon these records with the following exception:
if any litigation,claim or audit arising out of,in connection with, or related to this contract is
initiated before the expiration of the three(3)year period,the cost records and accounts shall be
retained until such litigation,claim,or audit involving the records is completed.
Exhibit E-i
University Road Overpass Budget FP sci DEA
Staff Principal Projed Ma Engineer/F GIS/Graphic Admin Public Outre Environmei Pedestrian Civil Engin�Traffic Eng Other DEA Travel Other Dired C
Description
1.1 Kick-off Meeting 4 1 4 4 2 4 4 4 $1,000
1.2 Field Visit 6
1.3 Website Setup 4 $
1.4 Documentation(meeting minutes) 2 2 1
2.1 Traffic count colledion 4 Z
2.2 Ped and bike count colledion 4 $2,000
2.3 Cell Phone OD data 2 8 2 $12,000
2.4 Roadway geometries and operating
charederistics 4 1 2 2
2.5 Sidewalk and trail inventory 8 8 1 2 2 $500
3.1 Property ownership research 16
3.2 Existing and planned utility location
mapping(GIS) 2 8 1 12
3.3 WSDOT,Crty,and Railroad plan research 2 8 4 2 2 2
4.1 Update Crty Synchro model Z $
4.2 Analyze treffic LOS,pedestrian/bicycle
deficiencies,and transit service 2 2 16 2 2 4 10
4.3 Safety assessment(G IS) 2 4
4.4 Cell phone OD pattern analysis 2 2 36 2
4.5 Existing Conditions memo 2 8 24 8 4 4 4
4.6 Website update 4
5.1 Finalize stakeholder and TAC list 2 2 8 8
5.25takeholderinterviews 4 1 12 8
5.3 Email distribution list 2 8 4
5.4 TAC projed workshop 6 8 6 4 4 $500
5.5 Public planning charrette 6 6 6 1 12 8 6 4 4 8
5.6 Memorendum and website update 2 2 8 1 8
6.i SRTC model refinemenis/subarea validation 24 2
6.2 F&P Pedestrian and Trail UserTrip
Generation tool 24 2
6.3 Develop preliminaryforecasts ofTAC
workshop concepts 2 24 6
6.4 Preliminary assessment(operations,cost,
environmental)ofTACworkshopconcepts 2 2 32 8 6 12 8 24
6.5 Refined forecasts for 3-4 alternatives 2 16 2
6.6 Memorendum describing resulis,website
update 2 2 12 4 2 2
7.1 Preliminary Screening of Alternatives 2 16
7.2 Trail/path demand analysis 2 24 2
7.3 SEPA checklist 16
7.4 FHWA/WSDOT permit assessment 2 8 1
7.5 Railroad coordination 12 2
7.6 Constraints and conflicts matrix 2 8 6 1
7.7 Documentation 4 8 16 8 4 2 8 8
8.1 Preferred alternatives selection 4
8.2 Refine design of preferred alternative(s) 6 16 1
8.3 Update Synchro network $ 8 1$
8.4 Refine operdtions,trail/path demand
analysis,environmental checklist,cost
estimates 2 24 4 4 8 12 4 24
8.5 VISSIM simulation of any complex
intersedions or signal operations near the
freeway rdmp terminals 8 48 8
8.6 Preferred alternative(s)analysis
memorandum 4 8 16 8 4 4 2 4
8.7 Website update 4
8.8 Presentation of results to City staff and TAC 8 1 4 2 4 $S00
9.1 Preferred alternative(s)workshop/open
house 8 2 2 8 8 2 4 $S00
9.2 Website update 2
10.1 Compile draft report from technical
memoranda 4 4 24 8 4 4 2
10.2 Respond to City staff and TAC comments 2 4 24 8 4 8 4 2 4 2
10.3 Revise and finalize report 4 16 8 4
10.4 Update website 8
11.1 Develop meeting materials 4 4 16 8 6 8 4 2 2 4
11.2 Present to Planning Commission 8 4 2 $S00
11.3 Present to City Council 8 4 2 $500
12.1 Prepare Methods and Assumptions Report 4 4 32 4 4
12.2 Prepare Permanent Limited Access Break
Request/Interchange Justification Report 4 4 32 4 4
13.1 Bi-weekly internal project management
calis/emails 4 24 16 4 16
13.2 Bi-weekly progress report calls to City staff 4 24
13.3 Invoicing and generdl administration 16 24 8 4 4 16
Sub-Total
56 224 580 116 128 92 176 26 50 1Ub 128
Sub-Total $ 209,802
Management Reserve Fund $ 20,000
Total $ 229,so2
Note:Other dired costs include cell phone data,traffic/pad/bike counts,software leases,printing,phones.
>
Exhibit F
1
E -
' � Washington State Transportatlon Bullding
Department of Transportation 310 Mapla Park Avenue S.E.
Paula J. Hammond, P.E. P.O.eox 47300
Secretary of Transportation Olympia,WA 98504-7300
360-705-7000
� August 1, 20�'� TTY: 1-800•833-6388
� www.wsdol.wa.gov
I
Marion Donnelly, Principai and CFO
Fehr& Peers
100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 600
Walnut Creek, CA 94596-3582
Re: Fehr 8�Peers Overhead Schedule
Fiscal Year End December 31, 2010
�
Dear Ms. Donnelly:
On August 1, 2011, as a WSDOT representative, Sarah Erdmann,Audit Specialist,
completed a desk review of your proposed FYE December 31,2010, Overhead
Schedule. Sarah also reviewed the documentation provided by Fehr& Peers during this
review process.
The reviewed data included, but was not limited to; the schedule of the indirect cost rate,
a description of the company, basis of accounting and description of Fehr& Peers
accounting system and the basis of indirect costs. � REDACTED
Based on our work,we are issuing this letter of review establishing Fehr& Peers �2� �� ����xF��
overhead rate for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010, at of direct labor.
Costs billed to actual agreements will still be subject to audit of actual costs.
Please check with the WSDOT Consultant Services O�ce (HQ)and/or the WSDOT
Area Consultant Liaison to determine when this reviewed rate will be applicable to your
WSDOT agreement(s).
If you or any representatives of Fehr 8�Peers have any questions, please contact
Martha Roach, Jeri Sivertson, or Steve McKerney at(360)705-7003.
Sincerely,
�G�
Martha S. Roach
Agreement Compliance Audit Manager
MR:ds
Enclosures
cc: Steve McKerney, Director of Internal Audit
Jeri Sivertson,Assistant Director of Internal Audit 1����; ;,
Larry Schofield, MS 47323 � �J
Tharmalingam Bremjit, MS TB-32 � '' 'I;
,-.
,;j:
Fi le l� „' 'f j t'r Yl
,'
'��
r
�
�
r
Exhibit G
Subcontracted Work
The AGENCY permits subcontracts for the following portions of the work of this AGREEMENT:
�P nr all nf thP fnllnwlrig tc�SkS'
_ Riaht-nf-wav ancl ntilitv rece:arch
-----------T
- �ct Pctimatinn
-Railrnac� cnnrriinatinn
- Traffi� PnuinPPrina analvcic anri rlPCiun (nartiall
-Pnhlic nntre:anh nrnuram
- Fn�irnnmPntal accPCCmPnt
- Ctt�i�tiiral Pvahiatinn _
il
I
DOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit G
Revised 6/05
Exhibit G-3
i�
� Washington State Transportation Building
Department of Transportation 310 MaplePark Avenue S.E.
Paula J. Hammond, P.E. P.O.Box 47300
Secretary of Transportation Olympia,WA 98504-7300
360-705-7000
June 18, 2012 TTY: 1-800-833-6388
www.wsdot.wa.gov
Mr. Ron Gasper, CFO
David Evans &Associates,Inc.
2100 S W River Parkway
Portland, OR 97201-8009
IZE: David Evans &Associates, Inc. Overhead Schedule
Fiscal Year End October 29, 2011
Dear Mr. Gasper:
The Oregon Department of Transportation(ODOT)has concluded their Cognizant Audit
of David Evans&Associates,Inc. (DEA). ODOT is the Cognizant State for DEA.
ODOT accepted the audit performed by CPA Firm Grant Thornton, LLP. We were
���� provided with their letter and a copy of the audit report.
� �
�.� Based on the cognizant state's audit and acceptance o�the DEA rate, we are issuing this
O letter of review establishing DEA's overhead rate for the fiscal year ending October 29,
�4 �- ---__
Q �' 201 , a of direct labor. Included within this rate is a Facilities Capital Cost of
��v�' Money a -��-""� of direct labor. Costs billed to actual agreements will still be
subject to audit of actual costs.
Please check with the WSDOT Consultant Services Office (HQ) and/or the WSDOT
Area Consultant Liaison to determine when this reviewed rate will be applicable to your
WSDOT agreement(s).
Also,remember that when you provide next year's overhead schedule to our office, you
will also need to submit either your internally prepared Compensation Analysis for our
review, or use the National Compensation Matrix(NCM)�ormat to prepare your
alternate analysis and we will review that. The NCM is a tool that establishes
compensation amounts presumed reasonable for certain executive positions. The
Compensation Analysis and NCM are described further in the AASHTO Audit Guide,
Chapter 7. We will need your Compensation Analysis, or alternative analysis based on
use of the NCM, in order to complete our review of your overhead schedule.
il
Mr. Gasper ',
June 18, 2012 '
Page 2 'I
�
If you, or any representative of DEA,have any questions, please contact Martha Roach,
Jeri Sivertson, or Steve McKerney at(360) 705-7003.
Sincerely,
fy�Q���
�
Martha S. Roach
Agreement Compliance Audit Manager
MR:ds
Enclosure
cc: Steve McKerney, Director of Internal Audit
Larry Schofield,MS 47323
File
Exhibit H
Title VI Assurances
During the performance of this AGREEMENT,the CONSiTLTANT,for itself,its assignees,and successors in
interest agrees as follows:
1. Compliance with Regulations: The CONSULTANT shall comply with the Regulations relative to non-
discrimination in federally assisted programs of the AGENCY,Title 49,Code of Federal Regulations,Part
21, as they may be amended from time to time(hereinafter referred to as the"REGULATIONS"),which
are herein incorparated by reference and made a part of this AGREEMENT.
2. Non-discrimination: The CONSiTLTANT,with regard to the work performed during the
AGREEMENT, shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color,sex,or national origin in the selection
and retention of sub-consultants, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The
CONSiTLTANT shall not participate either directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by
Section 21.5 of the REGiTLATIONS,including employment practices when the AGREEMENT covers a
program set forth in Appendix B of the REGiTLATIONS.
3. Solicitations for Sub-consultants,Including Procurement of Materials and Equipment:In all solicitations
either by competitive bidding or negotiations made by the CONSULTANT for wark to be performed
under a sub-contract, including procurement of materials or leases of equipment,each potential sub-
consultant or supplier shall be notified by the CONSULTANT of the CONSULTANT'S obligations under
this AGREEMENT and the REGiTLATIONS relative to non-discrimination on the grounds of race,color,
sex,or national arigin.
4. Information and Reports: The CONSiTLTANT shall provide all information and reports required by the
REGiTLATIONS or directives issued pursuant thereto,and shall permit access to its books,records,
accounts,other sources of information,and its facilities as may be determined by AGENCY, STATE ar
the Federal Highway Administration(FHWA)to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such
REGiTLATIONS, arders and instructions.Where any information required of a CONSULTANT is in the
exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish this information,the CONSiTLTANT shall
so certify to the AGENCY, STATE or the FHWA as appropriate,and shall set forth what efforts it has
made to obtain the information.
5. Sanctions for Non-compliance: In the event of the CONSiTLTANT'S non-compliance with the non-
discrimination provisions of this AGREEMENT,the AGENCY shall impose such AGREEMENT
sanctions as it,the STATE or the FHWA may determine to be appropriate, including,but not limited to:
• Withholding of payments to the CONSiTLTANT under the AGREEMENT until the
CONSULTANT complies,and/ar;
• Cancellation,termination,or suspension of the AGREEMENT,in whole or in part
DOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit H
Revised 6/05
6. Incorparation of Provisions: The CONSULTANT shall include the provisions of paragraphs(1)through
(5)in every sub-contract,including procurement of materials and leases of equipment,unless exempt by
the REGiILATIONS,or directives issued pursuant thereto. The CONSiILTANT shall take such action
with respect to any sub-consultant or procurement as the AGENCY, STATE or FHWA may direct as a
means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for non-compliance.
Provided,however,that in the event a CONSULTANT becomes involved in, or is threatened with,
litigation with a sub-consultant or supplier as a result of such direction,the CONSiJLTANT may request
the AGENCY and the STATE enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the AGENCY and the
STATE and,in addition,the CONSULTANT may request the United States enter into such litigation to
protect the interests of the United States.
Exhibit I
Payment Upon Termination of Agreement
By the Agency Other Than for
Fault of the Consultant
(Refer to Agreement, Section IX)
Lump Sum Contracts
A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT which when added to any payments previously made shall
total the same percentage of the Lump Sum Amount as the work completed at the time of termination is to the
total work required for the PROJECT.In addition,the CONSULTANT shall be paid for any authorized extra
work completed.
Cost Plus Fixed Fee Contracts
A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT which when added to any payments previously made, shall
total the actual costs plus the same percentage of the fixed fee as the work completed at the time of termination is
to the total work required for the Project. In addition,the CONSULTANT shall be paid for any authorized extra
work completed.
Specific Rates of Pay Contracts
A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT for actual hours charged at the time of termination of this
AGREEMENT plus any direct nonsalary costs incurred at the time of termination of this AGREEMENT.
Cost Per Unit of Work Contracts
A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT for actual units of work completed at the time of
termination of this AGREEMENT.
DOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit I
Revised 6l05
Exhibit J
Alleged Consultant Design Error Procedures
The purpose of this exhibit is to establish a procedure to determine if a consultant's alleged design error is of a
nature that exceeds the accepted standard of care.In addition, it will establish a uniform method for the resolution
and/or cost recovery procedures in those instances where the agency believes it has suffered some material damage
due to the alleged error by the consultant.
Step 1—Potential Consultant Design Error(s)is Identified by Agency's Project Manager
At the first indication of potential consultant design error(s),the first step in the process is for the Agency's
project manager to notify the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer regarding the potential
design error(s).For federally funded projects,the Region Highways and Local Programs Engineer
should be informed and involved in these procedures.(Note: The Director of Public Works or Agency
Engineer may appoint an agency staff person other than the proj ect manager,who has not been as
directly involved in the project,to be responsible for the remaining steps in these procedures.)
Step 2-Project Manager pocuments the Alleged Consultant Design Error(s)
After discussion of the alleged design error(s)and the magnitude of the alleged errar(s),and with the
Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer's concurrence,the project manager obtains more detailed
documentation than is normally required on the project.Examples include: all decisions and
descriptions of work;photographs,records of labor,materials and equipment.
Step 3—Contact the Consultant Regarding the Alleged Design Error(s)
If it is determined that there is a need to proceed further,the next step in the process is for the project
manager to contact the consultant regarding the alleged design error(s)and the magnitude of the alleged
error(s). The project manager and other appropriate agency staff should represent the agency and the
consultant should be represented by their project manger and any personnel(including sub-consultants)
deemed appropriate for the alleged design error(s)issue.
Step 4—Attempt to Resolve Alleged Design Error with Consultant
After the meeting(s)with the consultant have been completed regarding the consultant's alleged design
error(s),there are three possible scenarios:
• It is determined via mutual agreement that there is not a consultant design error(s).If
this is the case,then the process will not proceed beyond this point.
• It is detertnined via mutual agreement that a consultant design errar(s)occurred.If this
is the case,then the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer,or their
representatives,negotiate a settlement with the consultant.The settlement would be
paid to the agency or the amount would be reduced from the consultant's agreement
with the agency for the services on the project in which
the design error took place. The agency is to provide H&LP,through the Region
DOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit J
Revised 6/05
Loca1 Programs Engineer,a summary of the settlement for review and to make
adjustments,if any, as to how the settlement affects federal reimbursements.No
further action is required.
• There is not a mutual agreement regarding the alleged consultant design error(s). The
consultant may request that the alleged design error(s)issue be forwarded to
the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer for review.If the Director of
Public Works or Agency Engineer, after review with their legal counsel,is not able
to reach mutual agreement with the consultant,proceed to Step 5.
Step 5—Forward Documents to Highways and Local Programs
For federally funded proj ects all available infortnation,including costs,should be forwarded through the
Region Highways and Local Programs Engineer to H&LP for their review and consultation with
the FHWA.H&LP will meet with representatives of the agency and the consultant to review the
alleged design error(s),and attempt to find a resolution to the issue.If necessary,H&LP will
request assistance from the Attorney General's Office for legal interpretation.H&LP will also
identify how the alleged error(s)affects eligibility of project costs for federal reimbursement.
• If mutual agreement is reached,the agency and consultant adjust the scope of work
and costs to reflect the agreed upon resolution.H&LP,in consultation with FHWA,
will identify the amount of federal participation in the agreed upon
resolution of the issue.
• If mutual agreement is not reached,the agency and consultant may seek settlement
by arbitration or by litigation.
Exhibit K
Consultant Claim Procedures
The purpose of this e�ibit is to describe a procedure regarding claim(s)on a consultant agreement. The following
procedures should only be utilized on consultant claims greater than$1,000.If the consultant's claim(s)are a total
of$1,000 or less,it would not be cost effective to proceed through the outlined steps.It is suggested that the
Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer negotiate a fair and reasonable price for the consultant's claim(s)
that total$1,000 or less.
This exhibit will outline the procedures to be followed by the consultant and the agency to consider a potential
claim by the consultant.
Step 1 —Consultant Files a Claim with the Agency Project Manager
If the consultant determines that they were requested to perform additional services that were outside of the
agreement's scope of work,they may be entitled to a claim. The first step that must be completed is the
request for consideration of the claim to the Agency's project manager.
The consultant's claim must outline the following:
• Summation of hours by classification for each firm that is included in the claim;
• Any correspondence that directed the consultant to perform the additional work;
• Timeframe of the additional work that was outside of the project scope;
• Summary of direct labor dollars,overhead costs,profit and reimbursable costs associated with
the additional work; and
• Explanation as to why the consultant believes the additional work was outside of the
agreement scope of work.
Step 2-Review by Agency Personnel Regarding the Consultant's Claim for Additional Compensation
After the consultant has completed step 1,the next step in the process is to forward the request to the
Agency's project manager.The project manager will review the consultant's claim and will met with
the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer to determine if the Agency agrees with the claim.If
the FHWA is participating in the proj ect's funding,forward a copy of the consultant's claim and the
Agency's recommendation for federal participation in the claim to the WSDOT Highways and Local
Programs through the Region Local Programs Engineer.If the claim is not eligible for federal
participation,payment will need to be from agency funds.
If the Agency project manager,Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer,WSDOT Highways and
Local Programs(if applicable),and FHWA(if applicable)agree with the consultant's claim,send a
request memo,including backup documentation to the consultant to either supplement the agreement,
or create a new agreement for the claim.After the request has been approved,the Agency shall write
the supplement and/or new agreement and pay the consultant the amount of the claim.Inform the
consultarit that the fmal payment for the agreement is subj ect to audit.No further action in needed
regarding the claim procedures.
DOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit K
Revised 6/05
If the Agency does not agree with the consultant's claim,proceed to step 3 of the procedures.
Step 3—Preparation of Support Documentation Regarding Consultant's Claim(s)
If the Agency does not agree with the consultant's claim,the project manager shall prepare a summary
for the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer that included the following:
• Copy of information supplied by the consultant regarding the claim;
• Agency's summation of hours by classification for each firm that should be included in the
claim;
• Any correspondence that directed the consultant to perform the additional work;
• Agency's summary of direct labor dollars, overhead costs,profit and reimbursable costs
associated with the additional work;
• Explanation regarding those areas in which the Agency does/does not agree with the
consultant's claim(s);
• Explanation to describe what has been instituted to preclude future consultant claim(s); and ',
• Recommendations to resolve the claim.
Step 4—Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer Reviews Consultant Claim and Agency
Documentation
The Director of Pubic Works or Agency Engineer shall review and administratively approve or
disapprove the claim,or portions thereof,which may include getting Agency Council or
Commission approval(as appropriate to agency dispute resolution procedures).If the project
involves federal participation,obtain concurrence from WSDOT Highways and Local Programs
and FHWA regarding final settlement of the claim.If the claim is not eligible for federal
participation,payment will need to be from agency funds.
Step 5—Informing Consultant of Decision Regarding the Claim
The Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer shall notify(in writing)the consultant of their final
decision regarding the consultant's claim(s).Include the final dollar amount of the accepted claim
(s)and rationale utilized for the decision.
Step 6—Preparation of Supplement or New Agreement for the Consultant's Claim(s)
The agency shall write the supplement and/or new agreement and pay the consultant the amount of the
claim.Inform the consultant that the final payment for the ageement is subject to audit.
Exhibit M-1(a)
Certification Of Consultant
ProjectNo. STPiTL-9932
Local Agency Spokane Valley
I hereby certify that I am Dan Grayuski,Principal and duly autharized
representative of the firm of Fehr and Peers whose address is
1001 4th Avenue, Suite 4120, Seattle,WA 98154-1155 and that neither I nor the above
firm I here represent has:
(a) Employed or retained for a commission,percentage,brokerage,contingent fee,or other
consideration,any firm or person(other than a bona fide employee working solely for me or the
above CONSiTLTANT)to solicit or secure the AGREEMENT;
(b) Agreed,as an express or implied condition for obtaining this contract,to employ or retain the
services of any firm or person in connection with carrying out this AGREEMENT; ar
(c) Paid,or agreed to pay,to any firm, organization or person(other than a bona fide employee
working solely for me or the above CONSiTLTANT)any fee,contribution, donation, or
consideration of any kind for,or in connection with,procuring ar carrying out this AGREEMENT;
except as hereby expressly stated(if any);
I acknowledge that this certificate is to be available to the Washington State Department of
Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration,U.S.Department of Transportation in
connection with this AGREEMENT involving participation of Federal-aid highway funds,and is
subject to applicable State and Federal laws,both criminal and civil.
Date Signature
DOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit M-1(a)
Revised 6/05 '
Exhibit M-1(b)
Certification Of Agency Official
I hereby certify that I am the AGENCY Official of the Local Agency of City of Spokane Valley , '
Washington, and that the consulting firm or its representative has not been required,directly or indirectly as an
express or implied condition in connection with obtaining or carrying out this AGREEMENT to:
(a) Employ or retain, ar agree to employ to retain,any firm or person; or
(b) Pay,or agree to pay,to any firm,person,or organization,any fee,contribution,donation, or
consideration of any kind;except as hereby expressly stated(if any):
I acknowledge that this certificate is to be available to the Washington State Departrnent of
Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration,U.S.Department of Transportation,in
connection with this AGREEMENT involving participation of Federal-aid highway funds,and is
subject to applicable State and Federal laws,both criminal and civil.
Date Signature
DOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit M-1(b)
Revised 6/05
Exhibit M-2
Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility
Matters-Primary Covered Transactions
I. The prospective primary participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief,that it and its
principals:
A. Are not presently debarred,suspended,proposed for debarment,declared ineligible,or
voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any federal department or agency;
B. Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil
judgment rendered against them for commission or fraud or a criminal offense in connection with
obtaining,attempting to obtain,or performing a public(federal, state,or local)transaction or
contract under a public transaction;violation of federal or state antitrust statues or commission of
embezzlement,theft,forgery, bribery,falsification or destruction of records,making false
statements,or receiving stolen property;
C. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental
entity(federal,state,or local)with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph(I)
(B).of this certification; and
D. Have not within a three(3)year period preced'mg this application/proposal had one or more
public transactions(federal,state,or local)terminated for cause or default.
II. Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this
certification,such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.
Consultant(Firtn): Fehr and Peers
(Date) (Signature)President or Authorized Official of Consultant
I
DOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit M-2 ,
Revised 6/05 I
Exhibit M-3
Certification Regarding The Restrictions
of The use of Federal Funds for Lobbying
The prospective participant certifies,by signing and submitting this bid or proposal,to the best of his or her
knowledge and belief,that:
1.No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid,by or on behalf of the undersigned,to
any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal
agency, a member of Congress,an officer or employee of Congress,or an employee of a member
of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract,the making of any Federal
grant,the making of any Federal loan,the entering into of any cooperative agreement,and the
extension,continuation,renewal, amendment,or modification of any Federal contract,grant,loan,
or cooperative agreement.
2.If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for
influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency,a member of
Congress,an officer or employee of Congress,or an employee of a member of Congress in
connection with this Federal contract,grant, loan,or cooperative agreement,the undersigned shall
complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance
with its instructions.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this
transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making
or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352,Title 31,U.S. Code. Any person who
fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than$10,000 and
not more than$100,000 for each such failure.
The prospective participant also agrees by submitting his or her bid or proposal that he or she shall
require that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier subcontracts which
exceed$100,000 and that all such subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
Consultant(Firm): Fehr and Peers
(Date) (Signature)President or Authorized Official of Consultant
DOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit M-3
Revised 6/05
- � ,. . , ,
� , a�� ,��„, ,��,,�.:� ` :
� � � '
=w����� -� - �` ��. � 4,� � �s��� ' iw '���� ' e� ��, ' � �
,�� -'�- G ����.�.t.� ,�� .--k ��- ,�;� �����e��������sy��w ��, ,��°`,•`��'i.e�1`, � �a,�`� ��� f� ,
���'N ���� a�i� 011,��1 'oe • c�� m�. ;� �
���■..� � • �aa ��� .,e� �
��n��: � �1y► �, � ��� # �� ��A -�s�,a+. �
�..n.. a� ������.����� �����` � aF���►� a.■u■
�=`� ����• �y,�'��S'` ���'j,,�°'i������e�` �'�� ,��,y �.< �t:►A�`�.�°�mes� �
�'■■_ �� i ���'��.,� ' 4, ' �"�'M •' 9![lNlleiUtlltllEtl�l[�
p,��; _hi'� ��,4�'���.��� '�,'�r,�����:.*��;�1►��' � `� '�..�'°r��ennue��i�n�u� md ��
������� * "�d.��` �����d'' s■ soenmeens��u�����:��ne��e�
tllflill�'�� �������� � -�`_el9�{���9i•l`�H1�vt.�1tf!!11!i�ll�l�ti I�111 ��■
:i11 LI#: ��� [uiti. �~� ��• � •�% t811{��i�l101a' �9!'dif�1f�1'�,�1�ils�t■!1 r�
'�C�.�S 1!� �..���1�/� � �� - .a -d �I1111l11 �
:h`,�s���!��� _�� rn �,�1�i9i1�1elt���l�i�fli�8s����iui n iiiiii nnsiiiei .
._ .._ ■� .� � .� �` ��� �'`nee� !�'�:�ill1lil�it�f��!!1�f��i���ldi��iti!,,
:������ ` ��rs�muun�—�a�l�s�s\��r'
�.�¢�,f s�� ,��!�~ � ""' �� Sd{'d�� E��� Li�_��R flt 31 d=.�
. u�tr s
.�i►�..� i�� � �i�^�l0��i'�!1��i t s� �
� �� j� ��� .«,��,.���� .. �� �0�� � �N �r���Iy��I����
� ��} ��' �� � '������ �•� ��� %'�.11�:f�t�'�
� �/ " .1l��LttK:' a� „`s1 � d:f°:u�ne ` ■ �—''. '
d
■ _
�__�`"�` � !=� � 6� ��� °-1i. � :�.
� • :C:�.
.'� . �7e�n�;� -� �i � ,��� j"`; , 1 :�
� � S � �
. �v I �...� � "�:t
�
,_�� ��� �� -.��1� . �, _ __ ��j,� a�i t�- -:
�S��''. ��� � _•-� �' �� � ��4- ��'..�
�� _ _ �� �
� � a a■��'ts � �
�!lH P:3;'; �t�ti � � ►,�_
� p `���N/�� i-'•� �'
-� �� _:� - �`==���i�tl�l�� �r
-
_ �, ,��=�s- =;:._.-
,n `t� '--°
.. �a�� 4IDEiflq) �
. _�n s��� t�l�L.���.. � lI116t1A1����
VQ��ail� �a- �„s � �Ili�� ��
�..s� u �
�ty ��`lile��.::�1li:l�����._".!��lti�.iE�t��'�'�`1u►r � � �' ��� �_
�r ,�i���� ta��.S. '
4 �i .6_ .E. $ .��,I�t�1li N!��i6i111S1111D .�4lu ; . un� ��'• -
� �� _ •••• 1���N.O��n�vu�!r.� aem n�r i1t0n��,�� � ';��
!'� ■.1�1����a, !l�li�
� ���!s <::. � ..�..
� ■ �� -
'�` ` e��ts1��11!'/1!,! �� e �i��s�f��fsN
� �.. �7t ef�.�1�:7i���� I�q��h � ��i e�$u �� ��� .���1�� �71���
..s.a�?!� � ��A ,� �,w���'.7#r R,��°.M.,,��H.,�l�l CIS li�l�11 .� �►t! �i�i tli �ii� [�Illtllr��� �
�` .�, -- � -IIl11if.s
�;L'���iim��!�■ � �•--— —'�'�= —�..s wt't�� ■re�C�����t��`'s■ ����
� �; J �;����et■.J�� ,:��—��.� s�tnem.a�►o�, �d���s�::�i.=n■ .
� ����° �!t!!�:.� �r-��!%��ti1�'s�sti�Es�� ��1�l�_��s a� eeRSr� � �
�, s � �'���°�"� �������11I11n�li�.'��i l���'�s.� 1���'��t�t ��ll�� t�' ��
i
r. w� .,. .h>�rdw.mmw � .� . �:..
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: November 13, 2012 Department Director Approval: �
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business � new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Sullivan Road W Bridge Replacement Project
— "De minimis" Determination on Impacts to Sullivan Park and
Centennial Trail
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Approved Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board
(FMSIB) Applications on May 25th, 2010; Admin Report on March 8, 2011; Admin Report on
August 23, 2011; Admin Report on Temporary Repairs on September 20, 2011; Info Memo on
TIGER III Grant Application on September 27, 2011; Approval of surveying and topographic
mapping contract with CH2M HILL on November 1, 2011; Info Memo on TIGER IV Grant
Application on February 14, 2012; Authorized execution of Supplemental Agreement Number 1
with CH2M HILL for a maximum amount payable of $569,411.00 for Preliminary Design
services; Info RCA regarding the Final Design Scope of Work on July 24, 2012; Approved Final
Design Phase Contract with CH2M HILL on July 31, 2012. Informational Memorandum
distributed to Council November 5, 2012.
BACKGROUND: The Sullivan Rd West Bridge Replacement project has received $8 million in
funding from the federal Bridge Replacement (BR) program. These federal funds require that
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) procedures be followed for environmental
permitting.
NEPA requires that impacts to any public park or recreational area be studied. The park
considerations are included in Section 4(f) of the NEPA and are frequently referred to as the
"4(f)" requirements. If the 4(f) impacts are significant, NEPA requires the project design to either
1) find and pursue a feasible alternative that avoids the impact to public park lands, or 2)
prepare an in-depth report documenting why no feasible alternative exists and mitigate the
impacts. Since the bridge replacement cannot be feasibly relocated away from the Sullivan Rd
corridor, there is not a feasible alternative. Therefore, mitigation is proposed for impacts to both
the City's Sullivan Park and the State's park property along both sides of the Spokane River.
If the park impacts and proposed mitigation are considered insignificant, meaning the project will
not adversely affect the features, attributes, or activities/use of the park property, then the
impact meets the "de minimis" criteria, and environmental permitting can be abbreviated. A "de
minimis" determination will save the City substantial environmental permitting time and cost.
CH2M HILL and City staff inet with Mike Stone, City Parks & Recreation Director, and Chris
Guidotti, State Parks Riverside Area Manager, to review the proposed park property impacts
and mitigation features that will be built prior to bridge construction work, the park features that
will be available during bridge construction and the permanent features that will be available
after bridge construction is completed.
Staff also met with Andy Dunau of the River Forum and Terry Miller of the Spokane Canoe and
Kayak Club to review the park and river impacts related to the bridge project. They both had
several good ideas that can be incorporated into the final De minimis request document. With
these additional ideas both Andy and Terry are supportive of the De minimis findings.
CH2M HILL is preparing numerous environmental documents required for this bridge project.
One of these documents is the attached Request for the Use of the De minimis (4f) Exemption
(de minimis Request) which describes why we believe the project impacts to both the City and
State park areas fall within the "de minimis" criteria. This is a draft document subject to change
as we continue to meet with affected stakeholders.
Based on the attached information regarding the anticipated impacts to the park area and the
proposed mitigation measures prior, during, and after bridge construction, staff's
recommendation is to concur with the "De minimis" determination. This recommendation is
based on the following reasons:
1) Use of Sullivan Park by the public will not be interrupted during or after construction
because the acreage proposed to be impacted by the contractor's work area will be
replaced prior to bridge construction with a new, improved park area that will have the
same function, purpose and use.
2) The Centennial Trail will be open to the public while the new bridge is constructed. The
project plans call for constructing a temporary enclosure along each side and over the
trail within the bridge construction work zone. However, there will be short periods when
public safety will require trail traffic be detoured around the project. These short periods
include construction and demolition of the enclosure, demolition of the existing bridge
span directly above the trail, and installation of the new bridge girders directly above the
trail. A detour route will direct trail users to cross Sullivan Road at the north side of the
Indiana/Sullivan intersection and proceed to a temporary trail access across private
property (with permission) or to the Old Mission Road trailhead.
3) Upon completion of the bridge, an easily accessible trail will be provided from Sullivan
Park down to the Spokane River to accommodate put-in and take-out access for river
users.
4) Both the City Parks and Recreation Director and the State Parks and Centennial Trail
Park Ranger concur with the "De minimis" determination.
Changes from the 11-2-12 Info Memorandum include:
1) Revised Exhibits 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 , 7 , 9 & 10,
2) A signed Sullivan Park "de minimis" letter from Mike Stone, a signed State Park /
Sullivan Park "de minimis" letter from Chris Guidotti, and a signed State Park Land "de
minimis" letter from Chris Guidotti, and
3) Included a copy of 23 CFR 771.135(P)(7) Conditions outlining what meets the 4(f) de
minimis requirements.
OPTIONS: Council Discretion
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to agree that permanent and temporary
impacts to Sullivan Park and adjacent state-owned recreational properties resulting from the
Sullivan Road West Bridge Replacement Project are "de minimis".
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None
STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Worley, P.E. - Senior Capital Projects Engineer
ATTACHMENTS: CH2M HILL Request for the Use of the De minimis (4f) Exemption
23 CFR 771.135(P)(7) Conditions
23 CFR 771.135(P)(7) Conditions:
(7) A temporary occupancy of land is so minimal that it does not constitute a use within the
meaning of section 4(f)when the following conditions are satisfied:
(i) Duration must be temporary, i.e., less than the time needed for construction of the
project, and there should be no change in ownership of the land;
(ii) Scope of the work must be minor, i.e., both the nature and the magnitude of the
changes to the section 4(�resource are minimal;
(iii) There are no anticipated permanent adverse physical impacts, nor will there be
interference with the activities or purpose of the resource, on either a temporary or
permanent basis;
(iv) The land being used must be fully restored, i.e., the resource must be returned to
a condition which is at least as good as that which existed prior to the project; and
(v) There must be documented agreement of the appropriate Federal, State, or local
officials having jurisdiction over the resource regarding the above conditions —in this case the
concurrence letters
Item #8 —attachment
DRAFT
October 31, 2012
To: Federal Highways Administration
Request for the Use of the De minimis (4f) Exemption
Subject: Sullivan Road West Bridge Replacement Project—De minimis Exemption Request
Local Agency: City of Spokane Valley, Washington
Project Title: Sullivan Road West Bridge Replacement Project
Fed Aid #: BRM 4103(007)
Please provide a copy of this document along with the minutes to be filed within your local forum. Please
provide a second copy to your Highwpys& Local Programs for their records. This document is intended to
provide a written account of your public outreach for the use of the de minimis(4f)determination.
Project Description
Sullivan Road is a principal north-south arterial in the City of Spokane Valley. The Sullivan Road crossing over the
Spokane River consists of two bridges.The southbound bridge (west) is two lanes wide and was constructed in the
early 1950's, and the northbound bridge (east) is two lanes wide and was built in the early 1970's.This project is
replacing the southbound bridge, which has experienced significant deterioration and is classified as structurally
deficient and functionally obsolete, with a prestressed concrete girder bridge (henceforth referred to as,the Project).
The adjacent northbound bridge is in relatively good condition and will remain in service.
The new bridge will accommodate four lanes of southbound traffic across the river, as well as a combined
pedestrian/bicycle pathway. During construction of the replacement bridge, southbound vehicle traffic will be moved
to the northbound bridge. To temporarily accommodate three lanes of traffic on the northbound bridge (one lane
northbound and two lanes southbound), the pedestrian walkway will be removed and a temporary traffic barrier
placed at the east edge of the bridge deck. Pedestrian access across the river during construction will be on a
temporary cantilevered walkway located at bridge deck level along the east edge of the northbound bridge.
Permanent pedestrian access will be on a 10-foot walkway on the west edge of the new southbound bridge.
Project is located on Sullivan Road at the Spokane River(Figure 1). Township 25 North, Range 44 East, and portions
of Sections 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The Project borders Sullivan Park north of the Spokane River and northwest of the Sullivan Road bridges, and state-
owned recreational properties on the remaining connecting parcels northeast, southeast and southwest of the
bridges.The southern parcels are transected by the Centennial Trail which passes through these properties east-to-
west. Because of the need to widen the southbound bridge (from 2-lanes to 4-lanes)to accommodate traffic flow,
and the need to widen the space between the two bridges to meet State standards for bridge maintenance
requirements, there will be permanent right-of-way(ROW) acquired from the northwest and southwest parcels.
There will also be temporary construction permits necessary in the northwest, northeast, southwest and southeast
SULLIVAN ROAD WEST BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT-DE MINIMIS EXEMPTION REQUEST
PAGE 2
OCTOBER 31,2012
parcels (see Figure 2 for parcel locations and Attachment A for photos representing these locations). Figure 3 shows
an overview construction plan for all recreational properties including Sullivan Park and the Centennial Trail. The
current use of these properties and the anticipated impacts to recreational use are described in more detail below:
Northwest Parcels (Sullivan Park)
Location
Sullivan Park is located on two parcels northwest of the Sullivan Road bridges. The approximately 32-acre state-
owned parcel (No. 45115.9034) adjoins the northern bank of the Spokane River that flows through the City of
Spokane Valley.The city-owned parcel No. 45114.9015 lies adjacent and north of the State's parcel. It is
approximately 10 acres at 1901 N. Sullivan Road. Both parcels are managed by the City Parks Department with
oversight from State Parks.
Description
Sullivan Park is partially developed with amenities that include 3 shelters, 2 gazebos, a playground area, open turf
area, the Western Dance Center with restrooms, radio-control car course and site amenities (park sign, 9 trash
receptacles, 12 picnic tables, 3 drinking fountains and a barbeque). It provides a parking area (37 spaces of which 2
are ADA accessible)for all park users including those that attend activities at the Western Dance Center and the
radio-control car course (Parks and Recreation Master Plan, City of Spokane Valley). The developed area is used for
picnicking, a playground, and for social gatherings.The undeveloped portion of the park is west and south of the
developed area. It has scattered Ponderosa Pine, shrubs, and undergrowth with some natural pedestrian trails and a
few benches that overlook viewpoints on the river. Public access to the Spokane River is available but difficult
because of the rocky, steep riverbank. There is also pedestrian/bicycle access to Sullivan Park from the existing
southbound bridge on a concrete sidewalk. This sidewalk passes through the east edge of the park and connects back
to Sullivan Road from the "lower parking lot".
Permanent Impacts
Permanent ROW acquisition from Sullivan Park will be necessary to accommodate the widened Sullivan Road and
bridge. A total of approximately 6,000 square feet(sq. ft.) of land will be acquired from the state-owned parcel, a
minor portion (0.4%) of the approximately 1,428,770 sq. ft parcel.There will be no permanent use of the city-owned
parcel (Figure 2).The expanded bridge ROW will encompass an "overlook" at the northwest end of the new bridge
that will provide a pedestrian/bicyclist viewpoint of the Spokane River and Sullivan Park.This overlook will be the
entry point to a 10-foot wide public sidewalk that will gradually slope down from the overlook to the parkland.
Furthermore,this ROW will include the retaining wall that is required because of the steep slope embankment from
Sullivan Road down to the Park.The ROW acquisition and project related Park mitigation and improvements will
require in the range of 90 to 110 trees to be selectively removed from park property. This permanent use will not
impair the park's features, activities, or attributes that qualify the property for protection under Section 4(f) because:
• The small ROW acquisition area,which is approximately one tenth of an acre, is located on a steep hillside where
no park features or amenities are currently located, and no defined park activities currently take place at this
location.
• It is on the periphery of the park, adjacent to the existing Sullivan Road ROW, and is not an integral part of the
recreational facilities at the park.
• The proposed ROW acquisition area is not suitable for future park features or amenities because of the
topography and location.
SULLIVAN ROAD WEST BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT-DE MINIMIS EXEMPTION REQUEST
PAGE 3
OCTOBER 31,2012
• The ROW acquisition does not modify the attributes or characteristics of Sullivan Park. Sullivan Park will maintain
the same features and recreational activities.
Furthermore, there will be permanent beneficial impacts to Sullivan Park because of park improvements that will be
constructed and available for public use, prior to bridge construction and after the project is complete. Some of these
park improvements are necessary because the construction staging area will occupy parkland and will temporarily
prevent public use of that area of the park. Improvements to Sullivan Park will be done that will double in size the
facilities that are currently used at the proposed construction staging area.These park improvements will enable the
public to have the same park features, attributes, and activities during bridge construction as prior to construction.
Improvements include expansion of the turf area, an irrigation system, parking lot resurfacing if needed, provision of
a new eight-foot wide river access trail, and park landscaping restoration to a condition which is at least as good as
that which existed prior to the project.
The new park improvement area will provide approximately 0.8 acres of grassy open space adjacent to the existing
turf area. It will be provided with onsite irrigation from a new potable water supply line from Consolidated Irrigation
District No. 19.The water pipeline will cross over the new bridge to serve Sullivan Park. In addition, restoration of the
staging area shorelines will include a publicly available trail to the river(Table 2 provides additional park
improvement details). A series of figures have been prepared to provide a visual understanding of the park
i mprovements:
• Figure 4: Existing Sullivan Park condition.
• Figure 5: Proposed Sullivan Park opens space expansion.
• Figure 6: Sullivan Park usable space and temporary impacts during construction.
• Figure 7: Sullivan Park restoration plans after bridge construction is completed and the location of a public
river access trail.
• Figure 8: Proposed river access Improvements
Temporary Impacts
Bridge construction will require access off of Sullivan Road (Figure 3).The construction access will be located south of
the existing signalized public park entrance (approximately where the existing Sullivan Park sign is located). It will be
used for passage of construction equipment and hauling demolition and new bridge construction materials from the
construction access point to the staging area and the work trestle located above the Spokane River. This construction
access road will be confined to a narrow band of ground on the most eastern edge of the park and adjacent to the
existing Sullivan Road ROW. The staging area will be approximately 0.8 acres. This staging area will include small
portions of the lower parking lot (19 parking stalls) and upper parking lot (10 parking stalls) (Figures 4 and 5). The use
of these parking spaces will not adversely affect parking availability because remaining parking spaces will be
sufficient to accommodate normal and expected park activities (Mike Stone and Chris Guidotti, August 29, 2012).
Altogether, the bridge construction will require temporary use of approximately 33,700 sq.ft. of the state-owned
parcel and approximately 14,000 sq.ft. of the city-owned parcel for a temporary construction permit at Sullivan Park
for approximately two years; a minor use of the 42-acre park (Figure 5).
The temporary construction access road and staging area in Sullivan Park will be removed and the site returned to
pre-existing conditions after bridge work is completed using similar park-landscaping and restoring the parking area
surfacing. The pedestrian/bicyclist pathway from the existing southbound bridge to Sullivan Park will be replaced
with a new pathway and retaining wall. The access road will not require a change in ownership of the parkland. There
are no anticipated permanent adverse physical impacts associated with the construction and removal of the access
road and staging area. Use of Sullivan Park by the public will not be interrupted during or after construction because
SULLIVAN ROAD WEST BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT-DE MINIMIS EXEMPTION REQUEST
PAGE 4
OCTOBER 31,2012
the impacted acreage will be replaced prior to bridge construction with a new, improved, park area that will have the
same function, purpose and use. Because the temporarv use described above meets all of the conditions set forth in
23 CFR 771.135(p)(7), the City of Spokane Valley believes that the impact is so minimal that it does not constitute a
use within the meanin�of Section 4(f) and is thus exempt from Section 4(f) analvsis.
Northeast Parcel
Location
The approximately 7-acre northeast parcel (No. 45123.9010) is located in the northeast corner of the Sullivan Road
bridges on the banks of the Spokane River, and is owned by State Parks. Access to this property is from Flora Pit Road
that borders the northern boundary of this parcel.
Description
This recreational parcel has a small pull-out and parking area provided off of Flora Pit Road, which is occasionally
used by members of the public that launch or beach water craft from the banks of the Spokane River. To access the
informal river launching area from this parking area, a climb down a steep riverbank is necessary.
Furthermore, the northeast parcel will be used for a stormwater infiltration area that will collect stormwater flowing
off of the Sullivan Road bridges. State Parks granted an easement to the City of Spokane Valley for this stormwater
infiltration area prior to the bridge project and it is not part of the proposed action. It will be designed and
constructed by the City of Spokane Valley as a separate project and prior to bridge construction.
Permanent Impacts
There will be no permanent impacts to the northeast parcel.
Temporary Impacts
There will be temporary impacts in the northeast parcel caused by the need to relocate existing overhead utilities
along the west edge of Sullivan Road that are in conflict with the proposed new bridge structure and widened
approach roadways.These existing overhead utilities will be rerouted to the east side of Sullivan Road, either
overhead or in buried conduits, as determined by the utility agencies. Buried conduits will be installed along the east
shoulder of Sullivan Road and wrap around the east end of the existing northbound bridge abutments (Figure 3).The
depth of bury for cable conduits is typically about 3-feet below the ground surface. These conduits will connect to a
cluster of new conduits suspended between the existing girders on the northbound bridge. A temporary construction
permit will be needed starting approximately 20 feet towards the river from the northern bridge abutment and
routed to Flora Pit Road along the east edge of Sullivan Road.The utility workspace will be located adjacent to the
existing northbound bridge and will be approximately 20-ft beyond the east edge of the existing ROW. A total of
approximately 12,030 sq. ft. of land will need a temporary construction permit from State Parks for approximately
two years, a minor portion (approximately 3.8%) of the 312,750.8 sq. ft. parcel (Figure 2).
The temporary construction permit area for utility placement in the northeast parcel will be returned to pre-existing
conditions (using native plant species), after bridge work is completed. It will not require a change in ownership of
the recreational property.There are no anticipated permanent adverse physical impacts associated with utility
placement. Use of the northeast parcel by the public will not be interrupted during or after construction because
access to the informal river launching area will remain open to the public and the remaining portion of the property
will continue to provide the same function, purpose, and use of this land. Because the temporarv use described
above meets all of the conditions set forth in 23 CFR 771.135(p)(7),the Citv of Spokane Vallev believes that the
impact is so minimal that it does not constitute a use within the meanin�of Section 4(f) and is thus exempt from
Section 4(f) analvsis.
SULLIVAN ROAD WEST BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT-DE MINIMIS EXEMPTION REQUEST
PAGE 5
OCTOBER 31,2012
Southwest Parcel
Location
The approximately 4.8-acre southwest parcel (No. 45114.9032) is located in the southwest corner of the Sullivan
Road bridges on the banks of the Spokane River, and is owned by State Parks.Access to this property is from the
Centennial Trail (there is no road access connecting to this property). The primary recreational use of this property is
the Centennial Trail.
Description
This recreational parcel lies along the southern bank of the Spokane River and the Centennial Trail runs through the
project area along this river bank.The approximate 12-foot wide asphalt trail passes beneath the two existing
Sullivan Road bridge structures between the south abutments and the river.There is a stairway from the Sullivan
Road sidewalk that provides access to the Centennial Trail located underneath the bridge. At the base of the stairway
is a kiosk where trail or other information is posted for trail users.
Permanent Impacts
Permanent ROW acquisition from the southwest parcel (includes a small portion of the Centennial Trail) will be
necessary to accommodate the widened Sullivan Road and bridge. A total of approximately 2,182 sq. ft. of land will
be acquired, a minor acquisition (approximately 1.0%) of the approximately 209,960 sq. ft. parcel (Figure 2).
This permanent use of recreational property will not impair the features, activities, or attributes that qualify the
property for protection under Section 4(f) because:
.
• The ROW acquisition does not modify the attributes or characteristics of this recreational property.
• The Centennial Trail on this parcel will maintain the same features, purpose, and recreational activities as before
bridge construction.
Temporary Impacts
There will be temporary recreational impacts in the southwest parcel caused by the closure of the Centennial Trail for
brief periods of time due to the proximity of the trail to planned construction activities (Figure 3). A temporary
enclosure (Figure 9)will be constructed along each side and above the trail to protect trail users from falling objects
and to constrain trail users from entering the construction zone.The enclosure will be constructed of durable
materials such as concrete jersey barriers, suitably sized lumber and plywood sheathing or steel structural members
and panels, and chain link fencing.The enclosure will have a minimum clear height of 10-feet, measured from the
asphalt surface of the trail to the underside of the enclosure, and a minimum horizontal clear opening of 12-feet. The
enclosure will be designed to support live loads equal to or greater than 150 pounds per square foot for the entire
structure. And the enclosure will extend along the trail through the construction area from a point west of the
contractor's temporary work trestle to a point east of the east edge of the existing northbound bridge structure.
Small screened openings will be provided in the solid side wall panels at period locations to allow some natural light
to enter.Artificial lighting will also be provided.
Closure for short-term periods of the segment of the Centennial Trail passing through the project area will be
necessary for specific construction activities, such as:when the enclosure is being installed and removed, demolition
of the existing concrete bridge span over the trail, and placement of new bridge girders. During these short-term trail
closure periods,trail traffic will be detoured around the closure area (Figure 10).The detour route will include the
existing ADA ramp west of Sullivan Road that connects the trail with the street-level sidewalk system at the
SULLIVAN ROAD WEST BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT-DE MINIMIS EXEMPTION REQUEST
PAGE 6
OCTOBER 31,2012
intersection of Sullivan Road and Indiana Avenue, signalized crosswalk across Sullivan Road, and the existing sidewalk
along the north side of Indiana Avenue (east of Sullivan Road)to a Centennial Trail connection on Flora Road. Trail
closures and detours will be implemented with barricades and signs in accordance with Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). A total of approximately 5,923 sq. ft. of
land will need a temporary construction permit for approximately 2 years from State Parks, a minor portion of the
approximately 209,960 sq. ft. parcel (Figure 2).
The asphalt surface of the trail will not be physically disturbed by the project. However, the existing stairway
connecting the trail to the sidewalk along the west edge of Sullivan Road, south of the bridge,will be demolished and
reconstructed farther to the west to make room for the wider bridge and approach roadway.This temporary
construction permit area will be returned to pre-existing conditions after bridge work is completed (restoring
disturbed ground with native seeds or plant species). It will not require a change in ownership of the recreational
property.There are no anticipated permanent adverse physical impacts associated with construction of the
protective enclosure and bridge. Use of the southwest parcels by the public will not be interrupted during or after
construction because there will be a Centennial Trail detour provided during those temporary times when the trail is
closed.Therefore, the property will continue to provide the same function, purpose, and use of this land. Because
the temporary use described above meets all of the conditions set forth in 23 CFR 771.135(p)(7), the City of Spokane
Valley believes that the impact is so minimal that it does not constitute a use within the meanin�of Section 4(f) and
is thus exempt from Section 4(f) analysis.
Southeast Parcel
Location
The approximately 1.3-acre southeast parcel (No. 45123.9012) is located in the southeast corner of the Sullivan Road
bridges on the banks of the Spokane River, and is owned by State Parks. Access to this property is from the
Centennial Trail (there is no road access connecting to this property). The primary recreational use of this property is
the Centennial Trail.
Description
The southeast recreational parcel lies along the southern bank of the Spokane River and the Centennial Trail passes
through this property along the river shorelands east-to-west.The primary public use of this property is the
Centennial Trail.
Permanent Impacts
There will be no permanent impacts to the southeast parcel.
Temporary Impacts
Similar to the southwest parcel,the bridge construction will interfere with Centennial Trail use in the southeast
parcel for brief periods of time when a protective enclosure is constructed over the trail and for specific bridge
construction activities (Figure 3). During these times, a trail detour will be necessary as described for the southwest
parcel. A total of approximately 3,662 sq. ft. of land will need a temporary construction permit for approximately 2
years from State Parks; a minor portion (6.2%) of the approximate 58,800 sq. ft. parcel (Figure 2).
After bridge construction is completed,this temporary construction permit area will be returned to pre-existing
conditions (restoring disturbed ground with native seed and/or plant species). It will not require a change in
ownership of these recreational properties.There are no anticipated permanent adverse physical impacts associated
with construction of the protective cover(Figure 9) and bridge. Use of the southeast parcels by the public will not be
interrupted during or after construction because there will be a Centennial Trail detour provided during those
SULLIVAN ROAD WEST BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT-DE MINIMIS EXEMPTION REQUEST
PAGE 7
OCTOBER 31,2012
temporary times when the trail is closed (Figure 10).Therefore, the property will continue to provide the same
function, purpose and use of this land. Because the temporary use described above meets all of the conditions set
forth in 23 CFR 771.135(p)(7), the City of Spokane Valley believes that the impact is so minimal that it does not
constitute a use within the meanin�of Section 4(f) and is thus exempt from Section 4(f) analvsis.
Applicability
Please provide answers to the following questions,your answers will aid FHWA in making a determination for
de minimis (4f).
1. Is the purpose of the project is to make Operational Improvements on Essentially the Same Alignment?
Yes,the project is essentially on the same alignment.There will be minor rights-of-way acquired because
the replacement bridge is wider than the existing bridge and the distance between bridges has been
widened to meet State standards that enable sufficient room for bridge maintenance.
2. Are affected lands publicly owned or recreational in their nature?
Yes, affected lands are publicly owned by State Parks or the City of Spokane Valley Parks, and are
recreational in their nature.
3. Please provide the amount and location of land to be used. Does your project impair the use of the remaining
properties?
The overall project is located at the existing Sullivan Road Bridges (northbound and southbound)that span
the Spokane River at approximate river mile 87.6 in the City of Spokane Valley.The amount of publically
owned properties to be used is shown in Table 1.The project does not impair the use of the remaining
properties.
TABLE 1
Location and Amount of Land to be used by Project
Ownership Location Parcel No. Amount of Land to be Used*
(approximate square footage)
Temporary Permanent
Sullivan Park Parcels:
State Parks Northwest Parcel 45115.9034 33,702.8 5,982.4
City Parks Northwest Parcel 45114.9015 13,993.7 None
Utility Placement conducted in this Parcel:
State Parks Northeast Parcel 45123.9010 12,027.1 None
Centennial Trail Parcels:
State Parks Southwest Parcel 45114.9032 5,923.1 2,181.5
State Parks Southeast Parcel 45123.9012 3,661.8 None
Totals: 8,163.9
*Amount of land to be used temporarily and permanently is also shown graphically presented on Figure 2.
SULLIVAN ROAD WEST BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT-DE MINIMIS EXEMPTION REQUEST
PAGE S
OCTOBER 31,2012
4. Does your project adversely affect a historic property(National Register eligible property)?
No(DAHP concurrence letter,Attachment B).
5. Official jurisdiction (i.e., Park Manager, SHPO, Nature Reserve Ranger etc) must concur& agree the project is a
de minimis take. Please have the resource steward provide written correspondence explaining why this project is
de minimis to their resource.
Yes(concurrence letters from the Washington State Department of Parks and Recreation and City of
Spokane Valley Parks Department,Attachment B).
6. Measures to Minimize Harm.
TABLE 2
Measures to Minimize Harm
General Conditions:
• Prior to bridge construction,improvements to Sullivan Park will be done(Figure 5)that will double in size the facilities that are currently used at
the proposed construction staging area.These park improvements will enable the public to have the same park features,attributes,and
activities during bridge construction as prior to construction.
• Public recreational use of Sullivan Park,the Centennial Trail,and other recreational properties will continue uninterrupted through construction
of Sullivan Park improvements,duration of bridge construction and continue when the new bridge resumes transportation operations.
• A potable public water supply pipeline will be included in the bridge design to serve Sullivan Park that is currently served by an onsite well.
• Temporary construction permits and bridge ROW acquisitions will be obtained from State Parks and City Parks prior to bridge construction
activities commencing.The terms and conditions of these agreements must be agreed upon by park agencies and the City of Spokane Valley
prior to bridge construction activities commencing.
• All construction areas will be fenced off and separated from areas open to public use.
• Where detours are necessary for the public(e.g.,Centennial Trail),detour signs will be posted to inform the public of the alternate route.
• Temporary disturbance of lands during construction will be lessened by avoiding and minimizing construction areas on recreational lands to
the extent possible.
• All land disturbance areas will be restored to pre-existing or improved conditions(see Figure 7 for park restoration plan).
Location Parcel No. Measures to Minimize Harm
Sullivan Park Parcels:
Northwest Parcel 45114.9034 . To minimize parkland acquisition,a retaining wall will be built between Sullivan Road and the
parklands below.This wall will support the sidewalk that connects the new southbound bridge
deck to the park.Otherwise,additional parkland would have been necessary because without a
retaining wall,the hillside would need more ground for a naturally sloped embankment,thus
resulting in more parkland intrusion.
• Temporary access road and staging area will be removed after bridge construction is completed.
• Restoration of disturbance area will include seeding grass and providing park landscaping on
island between the upper parking lot and Sullivan Road,and between upper and lower park
parking lots.
• The existing Sullivan Park sign will be replaced with a new sign.
• Disturbed upper parking lot parking spaces will be replaced with new asphalt surfacing.
Northwest Parcel 45114.9015 . Temporary access road and staging area will be removed after bridge construction is completed.
• Restoration of disturbed area will include seeding grass and providing park landscaping on island
between the lower and upper parking lots and at disturbed turf area.
• New turf area to be established and ready for public use prior to construction.
• New turf will transition into existing turf area.
• Existing park shelter will be available for public use during construction or a new shelter will be
installed on new turf area.
• Damaged lower parking lot parking spaces will be replaced with new surfacing.
• A Spokane River access point for foot traffic only will be provided from this parcel to the river.
Access trail will be developed between the turf areas in Sullivan Park to the edge of the river with
a uniform slo e ran e of 5-10%. It will traverse the natural slo e toward the east from Sullivan
SULLIVAN ROAD WEST BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT-DE MINIMIS EXEMPTION REQUEST
PAGE 9
OCTOBER 31,2012
TABLE 2
Measures to Minimize Harm
Park and extend beneath the new bridge,possibly as far as the informal take-out area
immediately east of the northbound bridge.The 8-foot wide trail will not need to satisfy ADA
requirements.Crushed rock surfacing will be provided from the top of bank down to the 100-year
flood elevation. Below the 100-year flood elevation the river access will be left natural with large
rock and boulders moved to the sides.
Utility Placement conducted in this Parcel:
Northeast Parcel 45123.9010 . Disturbed ground surfaces will be restored with native seeding and/or plants.
Centennial Trail Parcels:
Southwest Parcel 45114.9032 . Protective Centennial Trail enclosure will be constructed prior to bridge construction,so that the
public may use the trail safely,and removed when bridge construction is completed.
• Disturbed ground surfaces will be restored with native seed and/or plantings.
Southeast Parcel 45123.9012 . Protective Centennial Trail enclosure will be constructed prior to bridge construction,so that the
public may use the trail safely,and removed when bridge construction is completed.
• Disturbed round surfaces will be restored with native seed and/or lantin s.
Spokane River Access and Use:The Spokane River is not a Section 4(f)property;however,measures will be taken to minimize
disruption of recreational activities on this river as follows:
Spokane River . Construction intrusions on the river including piers,containment walls,and the work trestle will be
constructed in such a manner as to maintain river use and allow passage(kayaks,canoes,rafts,
etc.)around and past these intrusions.
• Signage will be provided to instruct river users as they pass through the river construction area.
7. Coordination/Public Outreach.
The City of Spokane Valley has been coordinating with State and City Parks on the mitigation plans and will be
coordinating with State Parks on any necessary real estate transactions. Both park agencies concur with the de
minimis take and conclusion. The City of Spokane Valley will continue to coordinate with park agencies to obtain the
necessary temporary construction permits, acquire the necessary property ROW's, and to conduct the restoration of
park properties. Copies of park meeting summary notes are in Attachment C. Furthermore, there have been several
public meetings and City Council meetings that have included discussion of the Project and potential impacts to
recreational lands, including Sullivan Park and the Centennial Trail. Copies of public meeting summary notes are also
in Attachment C.
Conclusion / Concurrence
Based upon this analysis we request concurrence from FHWA that:
1. The project meets the applicability requirements.
2. Coordination with state and/or federal agencies has or will be completed before any project commencement.
3. All reasonable and appropriate measures to minimize harm to Section 4(f) lands are incorporated into the
project.
SULLIVAN ROAD WEST BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT-DE MINIMIS EXEMPTION REQUEST
PAGE 10
OCTOBER 31,2012
Please feel free to contact Melanie Vance at (360)753-7376 should you have any questions regarding this evaluation.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
CH2M HILL
Craig Aldworth, P.E.
Senior Engineer and West Bridge Replacement Project Manager
c: Mike Stone/City of Spokane Valley Parks
Chris Guidotti/Washington State Parks and Recreation
Keith Martin/WSDOT, Highways and Local Programs
Melanie Vance/WSDOT, Environmental Engineer
Jim Dingfield/CH2M HILL
De_Minimis_West_Sullivan_Bridge_Request
FIGURES
DEER PARK
�� SPOKANE VALLEY
���
P ROJ ECT
LOCATION
�
SPOKANE
CHENEY
SPOKANE COUNTY
LOCATION MAP
NTS
uci ve.
�
North
PROJECT
o LOCATION
�P
F LP
��a,.
LAT 47°40'46.76"N �'a9`P
LONG 117°11'40.01"W
E�lnq�a�aqVe SPOKANE RIVER
E.M;SSion
A�e
9
z
n
3
A
E.Broadwa Ave.
E. roadwa ve.
� �
j �
�
a a DIRECTION TO SITE:
. a eyway ve.
FROM EASTBOUND
INTERSTATE 90 TAKE EXIT
VICINITY MAP 291B, TURN NORTH ON
SULLIVAN ROAD 0.25 MILE
NTS UNTIL YOU REACH THE WEST
AND EAST SULLIVAN BRIDGES.
S`pokane
j� Valley FIGURE 1
nep��nlentofPurl��w�rks VICINITY MAP
n9o�E.Speague Ave.
sPok�ne�ave�,99z�� Section 4(fl De Minimis Request
c°°9�9z'-=°°° Sullivan Road Wesf Bridge Replacemenf
City of Spokane 1/alley
CH2MHILLa
TBG101912172433SPK
v �I�
� -�Y--,�_ �' � �;1 G ���� ; �r'����"'� �/� /jj/�� /��<I ���" '�.`�S� V�.,(� � .1 �'�I?,o I \
( -� I� ___I � PERlAANENi �1/ �� :.�1� /��`'°/¢� ��/�'� ���j/ � �,,`� /"$ - �l �\�y �n P!. � ��`N f2THWES PA ��`� _
1 swn� J' L _
- 'J � enseMenT e . R.o F ! � ,� /� ,p,� �///��� � WA�DEPT P� ��./ ��- -, �n �s.� � �
� �.: _
. 1 0
..� _ .I�.. MAPoCEV PkM�II.LLC ���i yh{? ���// ��j., l � A ///� �� �< �__ _ 45115.90.?4�g CJ � � ��/,i� / °���oF S�dCAN `
�
� ._ )�" r r�..�',. flE ACW���Tq1J LINE f;� -�� � I%���]� �� /.,..I�i .,� �// _ f�-��.,� , • f � 45114801 i� �1+
,_, ��� I-I ..._..<EA�""�. ti '\�(\,\.1 /��.�l�� \ ;�ItioOG'3a,y� %//���� ��� 59 > '�// ,. )li'
i �
- /'` = 7-Z - � �kF "5 � r � �/,�/� ���/' � Ii eow_eht aROCe.�d� >>> <<< > y'- �T�
�` �� � _, � I I� � � -� �;'.�� —.°{.� �5!- ." /� %IST ROW ✓_' ���ETAI 0 Y��LL < ,�/
__ :�<SS � ��'��S>�� �>��� �j;5�� >S� ����
� h � �����. /� � �_. �`� 5������ S� � <�� � ��J >>�<>< � /
_ ,;, i
�,,„ . _ �-- � ,� °� }�> >}Z�S� � -- �- I
�>
- % = ---
--- -
., � �� .�� f � - ",!_' -. _ ..T- = t .� - �..i�.-- -- — T�,1�.
S � � � 4
S
� � �1 �'�. .-�
. '-- �-. -� ., ' --
_ ., ii� - � _ .. , : � �t - - -� .. �.� -
�
_ -� ,, �_s., .�,,��
- i �
r j� i J o �, j / � � ���, 1
t ,� ,. - - � -- �� --- -- ----- � �"� - - - - �- �'\ --�-�
��-� � �� � a• ,; �� ---�- --�r '° � � � 1�
. �� . ,_, .. � :� - .
�.,,��' , / "_ --�R ,- ,� � ��/ ���- — — -- —����-_�i�-�J��` - / �r —
� � � ' aa _ ___ _
y, ��� �
I�,� ' -� ' I I �\�' EXISTROW / � �� � /
�
y�1. / l° / .._ - .r:; � I�J'�,Y ��// - ._%!; C,/ —�_ � �/ / ��/
- � � _
l� •'� � 'i / ° r /� /�' � �� �r -/�� j, - - -- - ' -- � _- -- -- �j -
, �
�
� g - �' ' �� ��� �) '�,,� .
l �� /�, � � ��/ � . � / ���'%;' .����,a%
� � <
'�� � i � W�STAT�{YEP , -� �� 1,��
� � �d � ��./' ,/ �� wnsHiHOroH su� L a/ �� ; PARGE� I , �y , , � � .
_ � � / /,
� � v I �
_; .^_� - ' DNfl MPNAGm LAND F� TPA �✓ ��, ��_ )) S �t��
_ , � 7
'_,�'-„l ' ,l:,i�� l�� /�/-:� / i : ::/�s"/� :�� qg123.9010 � \\ ,.1f / �� , J // �/�__ I��� .....� ____v I__
_ �,�/S 1
�1 ,/; ;,� ���1 � � , ,�� � �. � �
� --il \ , �'"'('` '"'' `% �/ i�''� I — I � ✓� �i% ���'` � �.,. I .� - —� `�'✓
' � // � � �/ � /� /,/�/I ,l � �'_'' //I��,��/� / /
� R A HA N�30 / ( � �� J,I I I IJ� I I/I .� I I I I I I I I I\ I I r� I
�;i � 4ffi3doa � �7 / oaqNnnr Hio � . _
l � �Pd 7� /9i/�G �/�'� �G�/�����llk WAIER NARK /��///'�il,.l�� II i�/ �.� I I �/� .. �� �__".—_...///�. �//�/ �� �� —�—, .� �-� �
Y NOR7H
RO.W.ACOUISRION TENPORARY CONSTRUCTION PERAIR
ellu Gwn ' �eM�••� � • �elw '
. . a .� iss.l na�
.I +�3 _ . . .. .. �� � PROPOSE�R.O.W.ACW�STION S�ALE =EET
��@ I 1RY4. _ ...I-:i..
_ . n��sLAr. ::iRfSa �.i ::Sff � Eo'+�`A1 `AYI:
�:.� ., :ypµ�i �u . ., . � -S.
Rp L'Vl0 �JF I l�'
�'n �� L :t50 9iA 1� ] ��! FX 2M�L "1%0 , � PROPOSE�PERMANENT EASE�dENT
�e;ia...aw.s.n air•rQe ti•- i�*s=+ E � .
PROPOSE�lEA1PORARY
CONS1RUClION PER�dIT
FIGURE 2
RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQU ISITIONS
Section 4(tJ De Minimis Request
Sullivan Road West Bndge Replacement
City of Spokane Ualley
GH2MHILL.
�' � 4 •
, 1� �� �� .t, F �y�� ,�y �� ,I� �~ 73. '��•�d � ��1. ��,J�':'� ��1
� W ,� �,� � « �� �i �+� p '�
�! � i a �� •.• .'� 1 #'�! ,A�_.
2 i ,`� . ,: EXPANDED PARK
Q ?�v �
. ° �" `OPEN SPACE
� � ; .
� --- / � _ . . ..., ,, � ,�
� �� �C �' �� ' I� : �
2 �� �
� SULLIVAN PARK
� _ (OPEN DURING
CONSTRUCTION)
KRISPY
' �� � KREME ���� �y�'�. _ _�� SULLNAN
PARK PUBLIC
STAI WAYTOTRAIL :�:.. ;�.._;„ ACCESS
- - SIDEWALK FROM CONSTRUCTION
� a���- OVERLOOK OVERLOOK BRIDGE TO PARK� ACCESS ROAD
//// /.. �'
i � i / TO SULLIVAN
� ��. _. j� PROTECTIVE' � �����������//.. / /� %/ � .. /��l �PARK
TRAIL COVERING /CONS,T,RUC�TION �
� ,�STA'G1WG�A'R�EA� � �
—j_ _._ �:� ,�� � � � �///�%�/
d /f/ � . , � �% �//..
! ;� � —!L/ i/ ,,i,� �.���. � . . / .., ����../,/JN/�
� / /�
' r� -...�';%/ / / /
�A � � �/////////////�//,,%////////.//%/%/�///////%//// ////%iiiii�iiiiiiiiiiiiii����,.��- .. " "
_ l�!'�'��� T - � - -�"
- - � — - - - - - - - - - - - - — - _ ��_���h o y- — — �ULLIVAN ROAD
�- � � � ' ���'���UTILITY LINE PLACEMENT .� � :
--; ' �' i��-�,�,. , ___�� � ..
` WALKWAYATTACHED TO TH�i�`�����i.�7`�������������/��/���rf ,�_�"��r�� .��� rI.
�
� � '=" �TEMPORARY PEDESTRIAN � �+'�
�
EDGE OF NORTHBOUND BRIDGE ' Q
CENTENNIAL � �' �� ' � �� � � � �' �
TRAIL DETOUR .'+" PROTECTIVE� (BY O HERS) '� eC4� � �^ ��.���� �����1�1 r
<'-
TRAIL COVERING •.
. ,
`_ r�, # � ' � ' �O�� � '�, �'��f���'_. LEGEND: _
��'' - � �4; ;�: _ • �, ��€ ' `�"��� � Construction WorkArea
+�!� ,•`- �� ` � . ' � ��
� �, x , . -X—X- Construction Fencing
� ' �
�����, � � ` �� � �'��=. � , � �� � H Contractor Access Route
. ._� __ . .. . ',�.,. _� _ . �:•, } l`,�: � w'
0 20 40 60
North� ' ' '
Approximate scale in feet
FIGURE 3
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION PLAN
Section 4(f)De Minimis Request
Sullivan Road West Bridge Replacement
City of Spokane I/alley
CH2MHILLa
TBG101912172433SPK
. � � �
�� �
��� �r ,� � f ��
p�1h�1 NNL � '�
T�� � �.. � � ' � .,� t
I -� � � + � ' _ }^�
- �.
■ � 9 �p s ���� .
� ` �{ t I
, ��� I��+1��f1rF0 L� , � "� � ;� '�
7' 6'bTiJ116 I r �' �- I����IR�►
_ t r�4 3i1Y1� j r�i �. "�
y f � ��.
I � ' o�
�s "L �-
— �if z ,, 'T` ',° �..
�'
tY- �"�
� s� .�,. �,�-. �� _ � � ti
.. � �:_ • . �� � � p � '
�� _ � � ',�- �.
.�� � � � ^��1 � �� ��
� _ � i .
�� '� 4• �
�. ,�_ �. " ~,�� I I i�'r ,r q �.
- �' � 4 � �- �,_ ��'�
� � `� �•
�.� �'_
�i.rw���c �. � ,�,
� �
F �`
� �
- ., , - �[���w��or - �� " � � ' .,�� �� —
' LL �__ - � . '
� � ����� . �ar,w.a . ,_
,
�1�- __ , � � � �,�aa-riLlB
3 = , ' ' �� •' r
- i
� • � ��� , u. r �, �� { � �' .
� ` �
i M I� � � �
• r�ac�l�� � • � 'T�
r, , .,�
. ' r #-��S
_ . , _
I � � ��
��., � '
�'tELTER �� � .
� ��� � � ��.
• `s
� ' q ' •=4
�� �pey�.� I � � G 1F
P �! f l ' �
� �Lme ° F ��
FR��815.�� � �� ..
�L m �.�
�a
� . � � I g �.. .
� � ., � � � � - 'ti � ��• Y_
� � ������— � ' ���-. '
� TSAec���o •' � ' FF[3Jli��
�_ . Y��rl I, ��i� 1 ' ��4.i� PY4YT�'f4/�'�i+■•�.e4'±�
1�
� , ��4�1�
� P1iEL■NlrIAf�1"' � � ir a�1►awk•e�Y�14�6�f5ftledl
FOR��VIEYk�Of�l'i' _ ' .
,� ' � k el K�R*.�d�
��� ° - —
. � �ry� r
� � -- - - �+l �F1Ri�
�
'..� �+ ,�� � � � G���.N��?Ji]t��S
�* 7 7R�z,'SI ��yN 1UF�F Ih:T[}�x�St�
w _... 4 EtAnRG£HAiL � ^�
R � � �
�.l"?f.
.. ' � � � 2. roE'�'7'�_RF Sl'�AL.�9€�Fh9LI5F1E�^�?�F+�d
�x',.aIL4k3�E�0�USc��de4R�'�k'�isE�Ofi
. ? - ��; N.a�?f.-4""I��R�'7[s�M°pdSfR�+4lC9�FbW
�-=s� � � �.3- al°## 7 +tJ'�'�T�I�W,c4���.Y��•�8 riiE�S*�6E
� ��'� �^'7f� �, RF,'fa+CPJEC
� F "� �i
C�J �.� � I j
�
�
��'i` ` ` �d �—
�. ; �
� .-�.��-;
� � '+� �� " k �C'cLCC9s:'�7Fi��C kF.'k"{X++iY,
)' . �„ �� _ _ � _ � �' � ��� t � ..
�� tl-' y t=t�rrsT�wc$i�t;�r�rpr�c
� � � �- �G'�3N5TAUCiIOriF VR7�S PR£A
=='�o�rU�frva� - � � �, � #»� — ni+�ax..K�xYtx us�aaa�rK::,eX?€a.
' p �. � ,��' � . YEE�A�"O��Y G�'+�'i AIpF�[j.h[;H
�ULL�'a�AN F'aS�F� �+~� � ', r1°"■ ��, n . �O�GTr�R�,a7R�E$T�0liF.dAIN
�r
I �
.-
.
c�-� ,i � ' � 4�- .-
i
�%Prl�i:"I"�5i17r��i G�r."i �n'fi.Cr .'}`. ' '°' � ti � � ' �' ,��
� Yi F;,t;; . � . 'F' � �?'.._-, �,
��L4'TIYtGLE}.�{�tx�TF+E_�FEf.1i�J�;L - - ��`
SE�iGYPCE�CU� RF.Eh14'V�,;L `,-,','•°�_
-F•Tic€�`il�.i3HdG - • • '-' . . � f' "
._ . _ . . . ,�`.�r�_
;FrRltnfl[3bu , , . . . . . . . . .
.T¢3'rsSGfLaFYu , • . - • • , , • • •
-zi���ING{tf.µ-Oi�6�i'�� ��4 �SI -._.' `,' '_�
:�j,y_ _ ,+�x. - �
��� �'�7� X ''-� 54 - ��O
��� .'."�. . , .` . .�' �'�r'�.
`�. , . . , - , . -��T, ;� `�
.,;'�, . .". `�,�'. . . �
_ ". .'X,. . �•x"s
WEV.'LAI�O'c.�S:;v�: '�.e,._. .p. . ...'. .
�Hr`;t�k -y�, _-_ ,-_-.� �
sua�...;���. j� i���, .�°� F '�"�� �
,�"xL�?�f; •.•+ I 4 � +� ���,
'�'I
LAiii�.r Fif:�d�'" J - ��
� g..��-�.:,j � �
�b� � �
�� 1 �
��1�"� =Y:SiIFJ::�RIL]frt ` � '�� - ���7��'�S
�4�3E REP�A�G �� .
V ," � SU��1�lYtii',I F3f3AU'N�STfjF�#�G�
�3E P L.A�C Eh1�1v17
P�#E L IM I1V.�Y �u�4avysr��,akx-pPrn Sf�ac.=�:xN:�!+si�l�
�C�R�tE`:'I�',V�i�fLlf . a. Nt�,t�ets�-�P,�9+�
�F��I H I LL.
p y ` �� �� �� ? �s � GEN�w.�i�+3�S
� ,;! N . �- � � 6.4aC£HA1L � � r N�"w T'.:K'Ska..q.6�E��Y1kF�41$a�IEDl,hlO
� � . �[ rYrtl�,x�:f �:aRLSr:..:`rl,aGR?G�!�SE7F
_ y � �� r�.r.��t,r<�r�:�c�ce�us�a�,c-r�re
,, I M „ � �,
� �'. �� 'F� �
UI%R�F 6�ARk;F{�i LOi � "�"��'a #- rf .,�_ � �� �,,,
Ts�ST,�mlS L+] �}a � � t '1
2�A�TALL� �^` -
I - " �,� ,
�`i+�$Yi�uf��idN FENG:'�lG(TYP;. k -. . L�GEfijG1
� ��1..E':_f+ti°�i�F�,��Fz�3,'t'J.�
�� G��dEL��a,T_RYR?':+I.,1- .
4. � �'�-.:'• �,:;;�STt-ll1CYIC�M�F�WCING
� -- �a �, 3��'�,' � � ��� '� ��,'� �' ��.- � C�'ST57�JCiICfPk+�7W�S.8RiEA
� �r .;r +�,. � . e �4. T��'II��k�P71'GFL�'a£L
- �* � - • _ � ` . ' ��-' a�hL'�IF�UCTI'L`i�l,%,f'f�Rti�.`! . — AP�97i:?x.L'P�[41b`��.IqA4`:�E�4
� -' -�,��, 7�Ai`�R�Y C�'+�i.�P�G�CH
�ULL�V.A�J ��L�K .. . r �� .. _ �XiS:WC:H.GNY-L7�-V:rL*.'T4� f . ' ARiI#�GT�+kE+�TREE$T'0�@��AaIN
. �
1�. �� `
" •.,a LUtVE1i�'AR�iINSiLt7'f �`- �' ` �
CXPe4NGG�7URFE6'�6�J�°.�CE � �- U. .� �
t 1_A R�vi . ..� .� 7R`,-`1'#l.I.S �
�SfiRFW.I£t+t[i dMQ H;'AlI.A9�,@ F4R U9E � - ` F 7�S7+1LL$ .. � `< • �. . � .
_`_'_ . � � � f� y, � 'r. ��
�_� :.;� - _�--. _�.�� �����
—, - - '�'�� *,Y_ .+ ' ''- y , ;� ��!iy� ` p �
� °�'� - ° �y� ,•� '12�" . "� �� '�
"'�'=�."� � ; , . , � ; 'I � �
e- , .- : . . . . , ,-� �. ��.
- 1 .��r'%. ._'..� . 1 . . .�e�-�.l � � ��{�
�!•=�il LaE��£.i�;k�r ' '�• . . .'. � .•. ' . I � �
S�^rLTl2 ' �
��`°�_� }-:�. .{,e , . , � f L � +�
,_ .-.'T`,' ','I � I� _
, „' . . _
,�. . . . _ .
. . I � � �� _�h. �
d-Y'4i�'IMG�MIE�.7EH ��+�+,� �4I 7+. � �'�
y�'� IT�Rnhidi'ti F dsl aZiC 5C �' . _ � .
�.�f3+�+..'#a15Tr��4r T,C7;', �i' x x� ,� � *
�i ���
����r � _ - I
~ !
�'� x r � I � �ICaLFf��fi
--._
� C1 {x � SU��1tifAial RC3J�F�'�Y�ST���3G�
b'f#ELI�u1l�ili�Y k +�,��� R�PL.I����IE�,iT
�{�RRE�:'I�'.V��#LY � �" x � t �u�.i.,vaya:nr�-H+�:�cero�ro�u�:7�on
'.Y'p�M�taA"i�.R F,�#1�.
� ��7� 'x �
r. �.. . V�7�����r
�_� �� p� ° ? �, � GE.NE��C+i�".�
N - - �` CiMYCf HT�.LL � , stY{.�.9v'r,w�a�t�r�r`.����ir��ar+cr.s,
r 1�' � �cp�r�0��� ar����;�H.��;r7�C
_ # � �� R[STC71�d+JF�('+i C00.7F�E T€O�'V OF r�RiDGf
C�3NST�`JGa�€]NL
. � #� �;
I"�Y
�v�cRP��iw?�[�r � � �� *�•
�5 5T,�LLS i �- .
-�. 7�F+�I+65Tr1L4S � A *� � ' � ��?��L
` � ' �*
4�� - ' � � ' . c_
LAF.��+=-�+P� `�� � �
9E5iO�T� � "�
�, �_,� �i s��r=cr�T������,+e�v�
r ��y ��- r�, �dt7�NSTlR�JC710�+FENCaN�
� � -- +_d]N�SIAUCFI�fV:�0�S8R�E�4
_ � � �ia 3; ei`a r�. �'� � AWF�[1x.L�p+'�U*.�:6.1P.a(::,eR"c,m
.- � � +� ,�_. a. . � �.�--r�" I i - :�#�I�D��Y GftA'+�L.,oS��A�H
SUI_L�VA�I P��FC �;.� ' - ' {' n� _ 1 ' ` . PR[FJ�wT,U�FiSTREE$TU�€h�AIN
_r. � _
.{,q .� i • ,� ��` � .
�_ •_ � ;�
. . .r �
� �� . •�r' 4C"'T+Fti,S�rKiNrirLGT ' �
E�7A�5Li3FlC]i�:i32FEG`�RENS�A£� F �STAI�L5
�-' lia�a � � ... � 2i.9A3E,+�ES. �1J
_ � J sF�SG�zw[aE5F�4UEE`k�RAfli
r�'. ._.�-�.�.y, . . . .�� .- �� 15:14:iYk714 iaLYi3{
.��RS`•''�-`�'.li�+--�T • '�"T'-'.'.•.-�-6r ' x I�II 14 '� �
���� -� (
'�'-� :,�": . . �. •�; .� :;.-�� �� � � ��f
. �._ - ,�-. .-. - . -. . _ .-. . � , �'��,�
� . - ��- -. ., . . _ . . ._ . , . y � �
_ �'�� , t , , " ,... �.. �y.y I $ �I�¢Y4hi,K[]N c�1,ft,1.;'4'IW`4.RD.
��,:,,� ' - ',` �}�'�i'_J'Y�".�I�l r.�5'*�.+.'. � � I ,
��� ����� �
�. � � �
.�'i:r� �, ._ - . . . .p.
�� . . .�.�. .�� . � � �
�4�x"�• •'+ . ��� 1 � ac; '
�' .'�,��-,- � � + ��
��� � - I 7�� I_ _
�? j � 4 ��, , �i�u�r� �
"°: _
���.r_;;�'�+�c ��•-:}. �U��7YAi,I 3a�3RF�tiN�ST���G�
. .. �
Pf{,�LI'MIfi+1A.�iY i4:�,o�+��H��.�x,ac:+_.�s �I,i � F ��PIACEfiI��I'�
�{�Fi F�E4'I�',b'i.�hFLY ' .! ,� sa44wvk.a�an�k-pa��F�r r_n►�€��1r�n
r�w:�a��a;•nri r+�a�, ,�e4rr����r,x�o-,�
'::EaT�R�[k�� �' .,�. . — 1�.
.� � - y�W
-- V'�7������r
ATCH EXIST
DGE OF
GRASS AREA ��
' 19
\
/
HIPVISTiE1+ea58.o]
P�18TA:10�98.96
�
19]0 -- ——--_ �IELEV:'19ssP pyl6"rA:�itaa.51 PVI[iF/:iBSB.]4 °p'm
_� K:1]a P�l ELEV:1555.5e K:3.[o
—� � L . 500 K3 ' 50G
-��a34 3;t LVC>
\ � '. 03F � .. ._ . —_---_ -------------------__ _ �
o �
` m �
� � \� � �TG
�� l0a°a --_��—_ _ .i_ �
�. _ �i o�t°/ ���. \
\ T.1'I+'12'10 g
\ \ tl I I 19 ,,
\\ \ .,.11iA3. TI �
�� P�' 4�1 \
::. \ I PT:1�Oa.9 19�0
�p� � �� e.� �o«,o „wo �z.oa ,owa �nwo
� .
� RNER ACCESS PROFILE
�;;;;;\````P� \ccie.5a�� SCALE:HORR.1'=20'
�/ERT 1'=1U'
! `\ \ •, o c.12ie5ao
I � ���\
� I � �
I � \ \ 13 BS .. . /
� SO �� � \\* . �o.� z
� I � \ O
FRryFR � � �'�� � ��� \ m`P" GROUNO �
E I i \ `�\\ '�_\ � g �
�
I \\5 � � ~
ol �
EXI511NG P�� Z
��I ______' O
E I "'_"'
v
a°csrc �
0
z Q
.. 1...:�.:::::::::::-lll::::.... LL
< � oeuNenreo �. �
� wer�nNO ' RNER ACCESS TYPICAL SECTION Q
..'..'.... souNO�rzv I I.
a �" .. rva. �. .. sca�e:HoRiz r�=s Z
i
i J
I ~
, � ��� RIVER ACCESS PLAN �
II sc��e:i=zo�
�
�
ClyofSpckaneValle9 �"` FIGURES ' F"���� o
y,� CH2MHILLm oe�rn�e��orP�browo�� � ,�a,�,, ``"4., a
� prague Avenue,Suite B00 11707 East 5prague 4venue,Suite 70& �!^�+��' �
Spokane,WA 99201 jPOKANEVALLEY,WA.9920G ����k�� RIVERACCESSCONCEP7
509-747-2000 eensio�vs � (509J9214000 L____- PLANANDPROFILE OF
CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555-48 HOUR NOTICE RECIUIRED
�
-k•J,+� �� -
� - _ . �---
�_ -��e
�.
� �:aa rr
• +a am�
mx�cct.i�*rr-..'.-J
I
I I x _dtirlat+�ta rd��-rrr: I I
ivrm
I I . ,,�.aae;•s•r�sk++�.,�ae�c otrr�a,+im
w..�.w.��u�..rti�rwea-�,
I + [cana.+c .r�. .q�.�i � ��i!.15.al�
rC�JN'7[+:74rYM}N'RY 7fR;hS['IY
� 2ARl���ktl.y� � I I .+...CLNS C,Th�.?!a.R Rih�ll'�£a�]I!+P!'�.
-rev,�aoar. •.,+++-.,r�-�w,1 r.�.,�r..:A.�p�
rrvr..e�u�v" ,�� ..Y� a�- T r,�+ucutr� �x,-wu�r r+wx�
I � a -�rro�rts.xe.u¢_r..axr�c-�c,i
s�7G.`w�J�k��J- , rm-rrn,,wa �,1.�+PF�Fx���t�'
}N�°R/�8YC7ldt a T�
� � � I t "�Y Z+S'G�—ki�C.W1 7ARY.Yf��.R6
b ro�.�r'�i+���»n�•�4�8mR
MF�y�lr'M'i'4�'�rtw�r�hh�Vr.�t,�'E�',
�
a�a e�m�me�a r�
�
I I i �
�
� I �
�; I I i �
I -�a�vrar+ra�,�rr*: i�
�� � � L�
�I ,�q�ST. .:a.axk>.� &;r.,;.- _. " �
�� � a, '��'�._ �
C�i�tl4#�� q I �
�� �7`J'�N��N4���kt};4��'�L�7"e�l� �
�� r.r� ��
9
��
� e. . '. —` ._. �� a.. .. � . �hA �e —
' [:F��IUIHILL, m,.� .�soxar�+�a �. s .,�r:�--��,r,=ar�i�prn af5r;}w�y-irr;t.a��e;e�`� !��,�..��s�
_.._
�; "'� v-rwr�.:c�w.��.�o.y�i��; � � ,I?�vl�91.�.+A,r,�8rbf7S ���_ �� ra3�ur�r.u.we.-rr.•rar ��� ��
lei �' 3eAOw.�Y��a° . — �_.n,:" �,���a ��4$111�'�' �F t]X .4f
� .e_ .� . —._...v. "'°"': .�s.
. � �,�� R=F�aFaF*�a�ia�U•-aac:�.�xrb�-�HUUr�NF,�r�=�-�t,ir�:�.
�,k �, �� ,�� , � +� !�� i I� - ,��-�- C�tN�ru��� r+�]i F�
� �' �� ��r x ��_s` �q� � _ j� � 7. i�iTEAIf14L iFk41447LL 8E PFk7rELTEIS
� _ + i �'+� ' _ - �A�fki,�Ffillutnw�! �re ee rG,�1,�G�
�°� �.-- -�i� . �
. ,.� �� i�'I � �,_ . +��fr1�aGlUCai4�r�ln�'F
� ' a�� °"� � � �_ � � . ��trfhflu[�u�uilOM.
� , � csr�i�N�a�u YA+V� haio�rYari� rf��[
" �I ��i� �Fff9il�ll'E]diL"�4ND FC#i£F'lGiLT
�..
� � CS.II[A4YkJl{G��IiB R4411a�C�YRFi�hl
,bU1,V�461 A�14W'RL�$e l91���i d['Sl�4At�r�+C_TFd�II ■11��
• gAeFE�6Ftl8L3E CR6E3k�E4ICYJIIt511,HE34
9�f�A,4'�fN+��"�Y � � . _ L]P117P R f'SJtL�.141N 1�9,��T_'�
. • - � � _ - a.r+��Y�a�rsrw,`..�aa�aues�x
— �,`.r��ta.iL��ln KDr 8n�.
y _ ,µ�t�ri�icrn hn�pa+�l+n+� �1U4�
'VY�.L BEVL+xE�ElE�i9daf Fti3A[7NYsY
`� `s�i1r+4-FE+�i i�5���`�
. um r•ua rrr�s i�r$�s 4,1d`�o��!{w5�_
ro��.xr��s �;.�+,�
—�saae�+a���ao� ¢' �� — . _. c ��r.
���
� �'.�� �
� e�;�
;�'r`_� ��L.__ � . ��..
� � ���
. � �F�'� . ��
_~��
�,� �� l
���� �
� � ti� �.wexar�r� � �:
� +4 „�4 �4,11 � ��a�rarw �r ��
o � ��. �
. 4�
� -�� � �
� '�fY�9�hl��1'R�I�,.�� �ti, � : ��r
�
� •►'�c�t�•�#' �,�;� � ��
� �CL`b�s.�7Pf�: �,,ti � �� �-�
�CO . � �nP�'� � ��
_ ' � ��
�.�� ��`{ ���
F� ���.�, ����
��r.��� . .. � -
�'�.•��[IIM.7r�'YFi�YEYI��+�7"TR.
� —�'T�'R��I�s� �4lL�L�
.
,`T`i
�. � � �
FIG�URIE°10
��
�4lLL11f,U11 R�Q�YE'�T SA��
FFkELIMIFLS:?7�Y.Y �R��
FS7Fl��f-�h'�l4�� �ff�1�iY1 T�i�ffQMdR EA�f�VF�lI
YYiY�lt t,a1t
. ���
ATTAC H M E N T A
Photos
' �F . �-'- i'i�� �y
t W .._ ', �
+�— �� • , � • ,,_ . ; :dl � � � � � �
.. ��
�
i � - �,-,� • � � � F � '�
� �� - . � � - _ .
� ._ _ ' € � � �
�_°- • - � . . - � - - '
-- - �-��
� � -
._ . . , y , s - _:_' � t �,�� ..�'
_. - � � i.a. �i y
�. • + .��r�-=- � , ��'�' �,� ,.� - --�,,,�1
a � � , , � . i. � � �
1 �f � . v- _
' : � �s � j
t
�
� � � . . ,� ��� s . �r�;�, �'� R'�
. �' � `� _ � .i ��r _
� f ��
a � � � i � .
� _�� � �*.' '. -- � —
, 4 . ,, �
� +`.`� ' �,�, .,�` ,. � .�
Y .
, s - �,_ R� J . . - .!,
� * i'r r rr � . � �
�i � � � �_ � ��
r .�� 4 � y
`� �y4� ,� q ��r _ �'"�, ��� • ,�
�IF �n �.'!f � +� "� �
� �. a
-�j* �� e�, y' �` �` �:'� +� � �` � w- �! �
�i� . ry �
►'.. �y. +� ,�, � : �
�° �► � � � ��jy �' � 4,�
b�� � � ,4�` . � � � � .
¢9Z� � �F � .'�. 4. ''� � �
_� I �� y,�_� �� - � -*
� �� �1' � .4�`r`:�� � �� � �.�T � ;, ��
�`.- �M , � . � r �, . . � .
� �, r ���� «��
. �r.��, t �j '� ` ��at - � ,
F � . � '�,�� ��
.� � � � �• .
�� �` � ` � � �
2. �4 � r�
� � ��V�.
� �-� :� �,�
- i� �
,�, � E.
. . _ � ° �
. , . � .
�F �.. ' �^_- - �-'� .� � , .� � .
T �'
�y� � � _
.
�"� `� � � 'r �. -`_
..
' � - � �
•�„ � #_
� . � -
a�-�
w .
�
_ , �' 1` ��'..._� _
r * � � �
:�. �� y ; �• �` � . . �_ �
� r �� ` .� � �° . � � .* r
� �, � . � � �
��� � ,� Y � � �
� � �
_��,� �: -. ,
,�� �
- - � -
.� �- .- � � � .
� ..w � , � � _ r
.���� � _ �
�"�. ���i ��` *„�
� �`;�.." ,�ii - -_ � . � ■ _ . . �
K
�� � . =. , � j' +I�r 1 • • - � � � M � ' � � # • �'� - — - - � ' -` _
,� � �'��� � � ., � _ ��,� �'T'� . � �r � �- ��� +�:� r^'° - ' -�'�
r � ,. , _ �:
'kt . - r :
. +r � �� �' �. �
� � � � s - +� � � t�r+ _ 'y� .1 .. ' � 3�� � - �:. +� r�
��Y� � } �* ! Y � f iC � . � �JF i. 4 � • 't
� i
- .. K � ti � M . � +�1 .
- a
.�..� ' � + � r • M � R
• R � �� � 4 �..� �� � � � � �� �
� .. 1 � � �� � ♦ * +' ' � �,
. � _
� .� � F� r � � 1 � . � � i . p ' T � � �� �,�„ ry���'.� , .I��� � ,�-.
'1�' �' � " _ }� YY� �� ;�. ` .�� � � y�
�` �� �� +�4 � �. � �.� �� r'�. !. ..
� F
� � �
� � y
�� . . - - .. .� ` u
��t �. - . M � 's � i! � �- -, ..�� .� . � �! � �7 ro'$r ,� r. ' p '#� • i�' �.
� � , r �! _ L` � � fi�. ...�� � � �� I ..
# 1N � r yi�, v -
r' � , � ' . hC,� � y'�' � - k. � " �`�#
� � . . - _
- . , _� _ �r " r '�:_ ��'� „' , � �
� � � � * f
, " " �-�
i � . .; ,dJN ' -� � `'� , `� � '" �' ���a ;*e�
.# -s . �' :�., �# � � ",��*. ,i j � w ... _ , �, ' a.
au a � ' � ` � � � � .iP' ' rt� ��I� � m- �. ''' *,"� �,i j'"
�,'�� .r � T . � .�1„ . �� �s >t��+�-�- - „ Y���a��j1Y ;i� . '
. "� �! ..'� �� �• ,s� _., . '�� yr* .J• �� *' F� T
, & s
, y ,-
I�M �
7 �. � '� �S '� ! • ��y 1 « - _ �y . . , *. .
■ �� ,,����/ � E-
_ . i�
� w " �sii�� -E., � �R - � � '��r 7. � �M R
:a' " . iF ' .y �� � �y �
,. T } ��*��+� � T _ - ��..� �.� �,�E s��
'. _�.� ► . . ' „� � . _ � * �, �
;� !� �
,�?.��� _ .. ���.���', �,y +k 1"�. ,+1.. � - � + � A �k'� - �1*■
'f�� ye _i�3 , ^�,�� � ��I�Y ! �
. ' =�J' �� - � .. - � �� �$ , y, ����� .�� �".
� � .
�_. �} _ _ _ � '� ''. � �' � '�� n tl } '�t � '.�`r �
�.--:. � -- .. � � � �� �`� * s
�_ . - - ` � .�� k � . . f�' � �� � ' j ���
" - .��s . . . '. � - � _ � ^ •� �`�
� y '
, m , .� . _ -,. � . .. - � � . � '
' . r .. � � � ` f . �' � �•F��- 9
- - -i� .._ k„ " .
.".. � ` + . �. ° � '? _.
• �' r'+ .^ .. ..�
� ��.. , !� ��. � ., ., � .. ..wL , �
•
. � . - .� a .. .
� �
» w ' ' ,�,�
�' .�. " *. ,�I�i�y' „ ,yr� . � �`^' ° -� _ _ ��` J �s�- � �-
R � � ,� � w, �
-. ,
�
r 9 . _ � - � .
.����q, f� 1 . . . . .
v p ',� � .. k ��� i , �
� � *
� .-� _ �
� � '� . . . �' � � + ' ' _ e� . ���
' , , � � .� � ,y� ' ,� � +� �
� ' i
i � ��.� . � _ �� �� t �I����f
_ •� � �� "� - +11�� . �
�
� y
� , y y� '
� _ � r .
_ �, .
.. � , �L . . •
� �l a � .. "�� ' �{ �. � � � i Y q �
�` �1
J"
� r � " �
, ,� . 4�M �. . i, � �.� ��
, . � �
_
" .. . �.` .` � � w� , . � . .� . R � � '. �r � � ; -
- p .' �. "y � � .. '" ' �f y_ .
; � � �� A� /'�,� .� . y�I f� � � - �� �
° s; ���,"„'�i . � � - _ ,,� "�' � # ���-�
'? � � "'� �4 `� � � d
�� r M. M �
' ' # �� `,�� ,�.-. � � � �� ���;�+ - .�
�A = � #' . - . �.1 �.� � � _. � -
� . y ' � � � � '�, � . �� � � �
,� �y !X' - . � * � � . : ' � - � � � � #
.: , � �,y ``� � ' � ., � I
* � .. • •�'� � a.-.. � , � �
��i�, ' � ~ - - - ` g- �� y ..�. � ���� �,. . .� . ,
_ �
� � '�*� � � , � ��'� ,� 4 ��+e �� �
_ � � .
• w - ` � ' �� w �I,
.
. .
f " �. �= y �. � �_ . � . a : ' . -
, y � -r�
�M. � � +�' � �� . - �� �.i,v ` ; .. �.
s .�. - ., � � ' � ...
� .d - � �9- �� a ����� � :r k� �.' '��� �I'~�' ��1'�-• •�
_
_ �
'e ' *�� �� � �� . �, �i� _. � �' '� d. �'`�? `� � � �
.
� •
� , �r ,+y� _, _ . �`r �� .
. , .
�. �" d . �'"� 'e ,.�r�.r 'r��w'�—--�
, ti � , ��.x� _ �.� +�'
� �, ! • M � �». "«t�! � k.� � `,� ,�". �T. �+� � �, �+.i � "' .
, .
' „ , �a r .
.�.. r . . . � � .
� ± .�� `��� '�ff �. .r � ..� � '����x 1i���� r� ^�J G. .n � � a�-� s^'�
� .� , -•- �� � � �a'
� '_���'� ' �J..ti • ;� �� � �} _��1��.� �!'_ .� �"� �1 ! y� � . _
. � �
. " ` '. rr � _ T � A.� r � ', ll
W
"�' � 'r� � � .� � ' . ��
�'. �. .... � : � .
,� '� . +��`.. . � -. "`��:t r�'1�.� .., .. , �� ,,• .. m .�'�r, !�"r�'Y,�, � �af -��`.J, °� �lA � . �, � , �
.
- ,� � �' , a * r:� , ���- .:F - . � ��. - .. i-{ 9 r ...
. �
�.
� , :� t,
�, ` �
. . . :
r� � _ �.�;1!ti J. , _ .o •r, ' � �j� '� ' y� � �,.�
t • ,, Y �. ` '.
_ , , ,�� .' , ' ', .� , , s _'t�' w,�� �4 � M_�� �q��P., ' .L� .�
. �y.
_ . • I fI
''�'�` . `� .. Y� - ��s''.- ,.,r.�. `� : �±r.' G y s . �q '
,
�• . .' ' '�„! . e �' �r 'X y_ i�l� � - ��. • � « �f',
'� ,i_ P� � �i d [ .
� � [ �, � j r��� i ' �y - �n�'��„� � f � ; '�'��;�"_,' S �',+l �� �el�_ i � �� � _-{y .�x�� .r
�.�J� �� a�.. � ,Tfi , , ¢� �:"3tifi � .� ,�? �.T�` P .. � r -1 I r,.. ' , '. �r�„� � :+.�I
�r . • w
; - .. . , .� •� . y -� �,y 4 �� 1�.i _
p . ., ' ,�
�:, , r ' �' �3�. ir. ..�.. . � Ts. ± .sirt,� ' . ws , . �� •%,� J .� �+^ * ' _.+��A� '��r ./`I �.�
'�j'��'ke�� � � �.'�� `�ry,{.Y. + . , ' � _y:°�*4 �� A;� '�� ��*�"r � . �� �, �f� � '� �� .' Y�.{,_
,i �� ,ti I a � +i_ � 5 +�
�y.t. � , ~ �'
, a.
. .}� �,- .. F � �r,` - _ � +� F �,/�
�, ��'f��.. J. +�� '�'���7-� �_ .� � 1 �# `-'� 'e" *� � '.�.' `�k'( x�: .9.Pc+f� . o -7'"�rCu.. . �'1 �'��' � - - - �A'�
r ,r,�• �+ y� -,,� ►— � '� � _ , ,� _ . �,t--'_,.,;� - —
` t. ,�. ��y- u,* - y ,�Y� •� y '�' ` � .'��.� - �'�`•s '�L�'.'• �"i, � y� �. ... � _ � �i ..t - • . , -
,.. � - . � i�� }� ., _ �
I�"` 1 �. 4'�� � � '�fr',�'�k•.���'��,�� -wr�. �r .�.{y� ht`.� e R�.- �F'�.` ��a . ' . I',�, � , � - 1 � _ — � ._.. � � � � � ` ." � � +�.
.
� x � �
* � � . i y� � y � ~ �
� :
,^�;• . i, 1��` ,i � ..' ,�y�•. + "1.'� f.. % . �+�''_? �� i� ;�y � +1� - � � +-.
, :# -„ 7P.� .. �... -�. S . _'� _ i � _ _ . �_" ,��'� Y , "- �. "—� �
t ..� 1 SM:.fi � � >i 4 ��4�
i . .{'7�;, � �" • � � . p � •� � ,s
�'�d 4 . . f���� ' ''` �-�''",�,t '"�e< <i�.� +� "� - - -4' � ��'�� �, � � y�"'"'� '� -t,�, T � �' "- �..
, + � �! , � Z'':�� r t`. � , �J'4F {' w �, - • 4q tr : •e!k q -
ti __ _
. , ,,
� y�y�
,^; .' - ,} • 'JJ t _ .
, i�'
�er $ � . ' � �7•
.t.r � .�� . �T'�F'� ��� � �� � - ,� T��.� �4 .y ��JV•.' � .�..Ga^ �'p�g�` y ..•��� `.�J � q _
�
` . i� i Y) .f, � �. . �. �� �l • �f �� ' ' i '. . .,- �.
'' "';Tys�` ' ��.'�f "`� + kp��aL _'�f� y a,ays' r - y ��y�:.'��r- . � .
'D '�� ' �y�� 4 1 1[y, ,�.i - F `µ�°n'f �t + 7 ,i�,,.,. °' #r.�
,
��+�sR� � � . `` � ��� � F� '3 w�.�e�`� °� �'i,.� '. � �,( �j.. �s. .. -.F
M
'!
� s s +
. i q
. .. .
�.` :ff� .�'. � , � ��+ ,�.. . .3"� :!, � _ • �% •�'S(+tl1� .� � , � . � �� . .
. �
;. � a �'�"'- +_ „`�� x x 1�� . ,:� �?�� "� n �+ ,
�' , b ,
.. - � � . T .Y' �
� "i , +,,��. -�.
. a
{ , � ��a
_ Y 1.�'"`.At.k�r`�� � `'S1•�J 'e. .�, � ;+ � +'���3� �R��� � 'r.��'Lw����� . r,� �i .:-�''4 d
_ � � +,� , R +t�_
� .
�. �ti � ���� �
. ' _ ;
, . � •
�;,�-r� ',,�'�,, �;�y�` � ++,�'�',� y ��' "� - '� :�;,4 ��°-� `N'��'�,, �'', -t`r r° '' r v#�a'.
�,�.�+° � �''�/���,- ' �� i!'!�t�:s'- '��� - ��' �aM'r'�r �, '' '"�' 'T '" . .'��'A�':
Y� � �r • ''f.�,,
'��; `'� �� �� w���i y��'�.'r,- �.,.�-..� ''�:,� y�{5� -+..+ �'.�ti•�''� . . ' . r .0 � � �' '� ..'� :.
.�,Y - e e J*.•1 _�i��w, ��.. . . . �.
° •,. ,'o .• � �x- �,.�- -x
.�' y � ...�` . • , y �,� .� ! � , ,�'. - .�
. , , _ , � . .� ._
., i ..,�_ , t; i�f��y�,�.' ° � y,� y � ,�
� r � ,
v� .�� .. �.'. . { �-i'„�; �-L k ' �� �r` •�� , ,,^��a "A' " `.� �'!���� � � �� ,�`..�+�� �� Y` .'��M '4? ��e* , �� ' ,
�, y
. •
� s' • �. , � . : r f �y �('� t� . �r� �� .� �j... - � . k/��_
�, - ��{. ' �'J ���•-'7i 9'+ f�R � P '�]� r�( /r r � iJe � �4 - v. _ �� �it 4M° .A y� .
t°' Jf.�v�4' � 3�- , f- s:��', � '�fw+ "�R �Y ` , �`- Ip rr• t�' • . . �f' y
�� '�' "� {� �J�F r ���i��`�,T '' " ` �1�4" `�,'�r�- �.:�. ,1. .��,� - . , '�.��;;�`+�� " s ''+ ��,- -
�� �- � �,'�I' .'�• y_�;•-'�,•t����.' - x,`- ,+ R � �'+�.�x. `'+M ��f� �4,` '� �;� .
. �
'#����, . ' ; r+ ���,`. ,f��` - ��. ��'� r ,� •,�..T u ; :,� � - � � ��'� ���'�!s� � }j, e
"'� � >, �E 1 f �
. .. .r , _ } ,� - � . y •
�,la' Y .'�r��� � k Y. + • ,� ' ,1`, .'a� FI�(� :k -�1y�T �1 �{Y�f��¢S�� �` A° �"1 f •� �.��• {�.�
, •N � ,* / �± d-�,. 6r'�a.. r i ` _ �� �•� +f' ,� �� �, Y�, '�iu� �� '� �-. ` �
Y �, _ � � s v +Tr- e,� '
.
_ _
tl r- _ ,�,`� .� �! R'� 11�/, . z `� r..�� � � rx.� y�. � '�'��/' '�� �' R. vr-r+� � �, �!
r �f •► . �
� ' � '� ` - .
..
.
�� �.,
.
i , ti ^_ . . . ,�. '`. '�; . �,•, �'' q� �y . ��1A.+�, `�K ' . ,��" .��
� '
. ., f
�
� . �" `
� � . , . � /
. .
' ,
. ,� �' _ ; . . .5.�; ''. , ,. ` � r^+e"�� . �.'{�- ., ` �- � �¢.'"# '''� .4 ° `�k �`�`� ���� ,� 1'��.. .�` , ��.�� f �- ��+ �
ry�' •r � ''`'` • �.`r,,•�; ° '�`r ' sY' •'Y'�. }� .�_ . - 4 k � � - �. �r, '' - ��� � y �
.• _ "�. . �� vt. , .1'� . 7 �� _ �{�.. ' � f e��R
s
� f'�
'. � f k '� � �' +`„y1 E .7 -�. "J , �. r . ��� _.r� i` ,l
. _. `_ �� � �y ?�'-. . � , �.` .°� 1 .+ � �,J �r '' . .. ' ,w -4 . .+i . � r
e. �� � '�..: � "fE � �," T` .... � � e � �``Y-
. a ir ► �
�- ��J' � "� �,- � � ''�u.. ..r. . I . Wt.. .�, � � _/ ' . �
, ir.r � '- ���,'� � � f ; �p� ��. ' ` t�� �Y .
� y F �`1r+�%�� �' '. +� „'" �� y�'r`�i..�� i F�::�+s_+ '''� r �_ � � , fi= ���� rt� �`� � � �'4 ' 3+1�«
, .
1a ��o 't "- . .�.. ..��r�..�.w . ��. w=!� �� �. �-+.
a . , ,
.
r- .r . . . . p
.:'
.,� �'_ ! , ,M+; :..• ",i�"�.. . . .rk.: ' i� �� � : '�'r . � " ' . �._, �Ss+ t„ �+�
.. .. . . _
r
,
s:E. '; " ��� ��
, y��.-�.s� �'."l •._ �,; "'�-:-. K�s _. �,- . . "*,�.�,,,�,�, «- _'1 • f�M� - ' , .J_ _ , `� �II�, � _
:'�
���"Ft,,.��'4,,.a .,'r� . �.� . . _ � :.. ?� F, . .: � � .. �" - . "�� x�;'�w � ?��+-
�� �
� } � .
,� ''� .- " , .. , .. .��. ,. . = ,- ..i ' ,•' .'1, • , - k�.' -
• � A.
�� " ��li � - .. � •
, ��� �,�Mr�rr.+ ` .' ', � ,` ��-.,*#°s��� ,�, � �!s : . �,;,''�' � . ..� �j��� ! �"., -. . "
a _ ��— �
y. „ �.., . : s
_ `�
°_°*�" �T`�: � f� ..i i � + •� '.,i*.-• , .. { ,�1!' � r'�'. t 3" ,��; e r w.rt 7Q, " �' � �y�+ i'���'
.
��,�.. ��.� , ' _ • +�, .�i
. . . . . _
� '� �a x : 7� '�' �� ��,A.�` , r �, , r,+ 4 ��!l�' .� �a �"5r
. , . .. -
� � .^ ������ ... .r'� �°�,'' �r� . _�1 y'°a`. �w ' �.. '�Y y
, h
.
• � .
�� �Pr „�.*�#..�,T +�,��` ,_.}� _,. -* ,� y�f��+• ., ��� . .ry' �'� , � . t.�..,. � , _ . , ��-�
^
.
� : .
�l,, ♦ � * ' �
+'7�,��� ' `++L�.'rr... / .4g ,`� F,-: -�� � p q� a � ,....� .. w�� .,4 _ .. 3 , ' �.5•.
. }
� � � � .... 3. _ _
' F . � 1� . r .�; � �,A �a�l. _..� q '< . .� .� .� � .�}� � , .:;�s. �«• - -".
�„f�3�.��+ � a yf,�^Y� "��� J�, �r� �P' � ri „�k.,�. S„? 3�� ¢",y_ .�. . , IIMi �'�.,�, �"�.,?�. .. s.
,
, � .
r T� . , . , .. �
.� F. �� `�±.q� , � . �
1- . ��
' _,4'�.p� ��i��y��[' f� l 1 �� k"� .1vii�k\'.���. ., f ,� ,� ���a �S.�i1� . r - -- 3 �� .. � �,` yd� •� �"��
� �,, � .� _ .�
.. � } ��'�"��i �IH �4��' / �i*,� �".
. 'Y - : r.. _. , ._ ' L
..t�.^ � o,l� -,� r z='iy�`�'. .. ' L.�. . �,r� ' � ;, z r'�- - � ,,,r . �� ��
" f" r ;'- �. � � 'y °'�.� s� q �� A � ,�y,ip` .�f , � �`� "f„a'� ^' ` _ . v .r '4 �
i
� �.l�.i:� �'� p t� ■ �'�� " �� �rs. a,� !�` ' - .>a�� ��" ' . �
�. A �� , �� Ym.i .i,F �1' .1�yr�+��..'' .+- �� I ' , � � Fl�4i��. -��.
'� �� � �' �R � 4 .�2� . . �� ^,�.♦ f_ q ` :•�T''�y _. ��4 .�_ � <��f � �
'��". _� ���- a ,�.�,�i. ;�,�T-. rj fq�r.d�! ^� r.,�.+� q...' .k�.�i. ..!�.�. � �yr. �n -'"�q . � .ti!'!4� -- _�-'_ --,�"�. - '�„�•-`1"�'�,
r p� _��'.� ' � ,. y � i�k�e�f�,y �' '�Yi��
` • -��i .. � y,{�9r ,�y
�Y _ 1� y, , _
9 -'�.�,,� �_ � •.� ��++F'-s s�rr�'1�!f��. rRE.�- t 1!� "�1"�b.t'�'��i*° i�ly.��N1�(i. +.��,1]J'. �Eri.� �-� . "A- �.�,` _ - - 1'" � �
� r �.
� . _ , .4i•�„ ` " '- " k'
.
- " �
a
' .��A��_ .�.r--�.�' ..�..�,- z.e.. 'Itl.+e � _ . .-._ .. . _ . .. dhe����1dF�.
ATTAC H M E N T B
Correspondence
*.�itrt}F�Y
� { �
# � i
eh ��i
�'1+� i#��i�.l.��.
S'�ATE QF'4V+�5HIi��t��l
�E�`�►�T�IEhI�' �� ,����,A�+����'Y & �I��'��lC �����I�VJ4TI��
f�63 s_ C$prroJ way, Su�te ro� # Qrym�ta, tAf����n��on �8�[��
��l�PFI��1����55; �i� �Ox $$,�� ' ���'f'!T�]��, �/El3�1�rJ[]�R]t7��'�fJ�•����
�36�J 58�6-��kt�5 • F�it Altrrr�b�f(3i��?) lSfi�-,3UbT = UV�ei�srfe: �+'ww.�a��_►V�p_�tl�
���i�m�er �, �Q��
f1Af Tren� d� E�oer � � h°� `� 1.��'.'�:l p'f�u�����I�'��;
V1��C3C�"�, High�ways � ����I €�'r��r�rt�s
R� B�x ��39�1 t � �4� ����
�lympi�, U�VA �8S{�-���p
Ir� f�iur� �vrr��p������e �ie�se r���r �o: a �
���: ���1�2-�}7-FH'tiNN�
]�r€�pee�#y; ��1Pivan �v�d Vv'�s� B�id�e F��pla�e�1�^t ��eti ,A��I F�Rf�••�1i�3;Q:�7 i
Re. �reF�r���l�gy — �1�� �p���ble, No �Mi�#�r���'r�lq�r��es
D�ar �uqr �e ���r:
�f h�nk y€�� far c�nt�cti�� ��� Q�I�I� �f�C� R��3ViCIIF1� 2k i,`C��J�f�S �T5@ G4JI�kJ1°3� f�#s"{7UfC�I'S SLdfV�t}F ��J`'�1�1� �{e��r�d
�y' C4-1���IkiL V'�� C��C,�r fh�t 4n� ��i��v�n ���� 8�1�#g� �� nr�t efi��bl� ��cr I��t�n� �� ��re Nati�+��� F���i�t�r tri
�-i�s�[�ric F�k�c�s. W� f�rth�� �:�ncur wilh tts�ir�r�a��ss�o��� r��cc�mm�d�lion� �tr�r# yc�u�r [ir�9n� c�f nt�
his��r:c �rc����#i+�s af����� f�r th� br;d�e f�p��cerne�� pr�}�ct
'4N�wc�;.�f# �ppr�cia�e receiv�n� ar+y ��rr�sp�r�d��� r�r�mmet�ts fr�qm c�n�t��d tribe�s �►r oth�r �ar�i�s
�h�t ��r� ����i�+� �s ye��r c.�rs;a�C a�nd�r th�r�urre�n�n���# ;3B��R$�� �1��}���.
�he�e �t�rnm�nt� ar� �aas�d ��'+ th� irsf�r�n�xr�r� a�+ai Pat�l� a� th� RNrr�+� �af I�r�s r��+M�w �n�J r�� the k�e�p�Nf+�f
th� ���t� w-iistor�� �reservatEC� �rce�r' in c�r`�f�rrrr�nc+e�rit�r ��trc�n 1{�� pf �he �1�ki�n�d �iksi��l�
i'r�s�rv�+`c��sr� A�i��+�I �;s +�G��m�r,�ir1� r�gu�atr�n� ���rR$00.
�hou#d addi�ior��� ir�form���� �e�c�me �v�il�bl�, aur �ss�ss�mer�r r�aa�r � r+�wa�c�d. Ir� ��� �v��f tk�a�
�r�h��c�IG�r�t �� hisi�r��rna�t�ri�l� �r� ��sco►rer�d dur��r� �r�je�# ��t��'#lk��, w�i�4c �n tf�� �rnrp're���t� �+I�k�riCy�
rn�,�i st�a� t�e�r�a s�cu.r�c�. and tf��s a�c� arx� !#�e c�nc�r��� tr��,��. ����fi�d
���nk �rvu ��r t�� oppc��t�nity !n r�vi��nr �rrc! comrtie�i I#y+c�u �hau� ,�n}� ����tit�+��, �ale��� �+�nt�+�t r��;.
�ie��:er��+�
�����
1�atth�!v s��rr��r, '4q.f�.
1`�a�+s�orEati�n �4r�t�ae�i+�g+s#
���Ct� ��-�i782
m��th��r,�t�rn���d�l�,� wa.��r�+
���er�+Rrr�E�ti �� ,���He��tb��C� ���TOR��pats��v�tipi�
� — --- _r .r r �� —_ - -
,�C�171���� _,
� �'�rlc� �t��d f�ecrealror� pep�a�trr�ert�.
������ �a�2�� r��. U�:�t,v��y Pl��e � ����.ar�e Vasb�y. W�4 �1��1�
'�€�.fi8�.Q3��1 +r �a�� S�R�.F���,�i8� . �a���k�r7�lr�c+�s�rl�,nev�#k�y.���
+ —
f����c�n��eP' S, �0��
�r�i� ,�l�u�r�rt�, �.�.
Ci#y �� ap�k�r� '��IP�y
�17�� �. ��r��u� A+r�., ��e, IOC�
��7�:��i'Ft� 1I�11�'y+ 1�rJ� 9���C,
R�: ��.illi�r�ra R.�a�1 '4V��� E����c��� R.���kt��t�rt7��t�. f�ro�e�� — �ul�iv�� Pdr�:
����r�r��lg�'
�`l�+� �wty c�F 5���a�� �J�I��y C�r�;���rrffi�����i ��f ��:���EC 1�"���r�:� �� pr�p��i�� r�� r�,�,��_� th�
��istin� 5�9iiv�n R.�a� '�+es� ���+�g� ����k�hi���nd bric����. �#�i� �ru���t v�rill Im;��c�
���ll�rrar+ ��rJ� wik� ���f��i����ly �,���C� ��qw �k_ �F ��rr�rar�er�t ��rr����t ��d ����r���;m��cly
1��,�}�}� s�, �t. v� �rt���rary Mnnp�ct ��II p��r����e�t inr�p�c�s ora 1rV�s��;��t��r ���k� �'��'�;s
��r�el �o. ����15��C3�?}, �'h�r� wa�l �niy �� t�mp�rar�r dmpa�ts �c� t�� ci�yR�v����c:l ��rc��
h�1ta. �511�.�`��� ��f �ppro�€�rr��t�ly ��+,�0�� ��. rt.
1"�e p��r��ra�r�t irnpae�� �r� d�a� r,t� t,f�� �wfd�nln� c�F t�� '��I��v�n I�+�a+� W�1+�s� I�r���i�e
�r����s�r�y to a����r�np���� ��our• 1an�� c�f lr�f�� a�r��l 1� wi��� t�� ���c�.� ���r+��� �n�e
kv�uc� brir�t�es (s��.��h���r,d ��� r��r�l�b�u�d} k� r����� �t�te �t����rc�� f�r �ir�dg�
rr��ifi���r��a��� r��u�r�����, r�suk�i�� ir� �t�inc�r r-M�h��r��-var�y �c��i��tivr�. #��rm���r�t
t�r�����.��1 ��a7��a�is v�+il! �nclu�e � ���w ����'r��p��r�k pler��� sh�i��r �c�c�te�d �� � n�� ��.�I�
�r��� �r�C� �r� �i�h�.-�oc�k wid� �-iver �cce5� �r�i� �r�r�°� ��u#�i��n �'�r� k� ki�+� r��+�r. pu� ��
ll�� rr�i�7t�� �r�r�ount �f ���lacm+���w���� r�cr���ic�n�6 l�n�l. p�r��ne�t�y �s���c�� fr�.r� r��h�t-
�����y ��q,urs��iC?�, ��d t�e ��d�d ���r��� �f � rt�k�+ k�� �r��, pf�n�� ��el�er ���I ��v�r
����s� lr�iM ��r ,���li� ���, �fi� ����+�ss�� ��{i� �u�e �s b�r���'rciaF ir r��k�r� a�d +1�ra�l n�t
����r�s�4� dffetl �he ���tu��, ����b+���s �r �ct�+v�ta�s q��lif�rir�� �ulliu�n ��r� F�r
prok�ti�ra �tnde� �tinn 4�f�.
Tt�e �ra��xas� ��rra�vr�r� i�n���� ��u�e� by� c�n��r�ctic�n ea��rr�e�nks �a�� a���s� ar��l
�t�gir�� ��e�� �r� � rr,ir��r irx�p�i�t +n r���ur� ��nfl ri���r��k�t�� ��r ���fiv�� ��rk. ����s�
tF�e City +�f �����e V�I��y ��� ��r��r� ta� N����la�� �I��v t���-� a���a �h�t w�61 �� �c�c��i��i 1��+
t�� ��r'��s�tl �t��nstruck9[�r1 s���r�c� �r�� �n�� ����u�� kl�i'.� ECY?pM•r�v�m�nk� �� �u11av��
Pa��; �^ulll b� �1+��� �ri�r t� +c�nstr�c:tic�r� �r�d i�� �v�ll��6� f�i• ���li� �a�, tl-,e C�ty ��
5��,�kar�� VaNI�� �'�i�k� � ��cr��Liot� ���ar�r���t d��s r��t ��ta�.i{���� ��:rm�;�e�t �dv���s�
�hy��c�a �r��pact5 �� �i.tlihv'�� �'�rk, �r7��rC}v�l���r��s ��r�41 �o�i�a� ��� �az�e a� �xis���q t�a��
�re� ar�cl ����w ;r�cR�tie �a�c�+�� ��� r�s�,r��c�r�� `f r��e��d, �F7�� p��•� ��n�sc��ir�� �e��a��tio�
�� � cc�r����i+��� ���c� is �� +��s� �� +�os�� as 1��� whi��-ti ��i���d �a�'r�r �� �i�� p�o�eck.,
���a��s+v9 �th� p�rk ����r�v�me���� v�rpll b� �v�i9�bl� �c� ��a� ��a�fic prFf��- i� bF�i���
�.s�r�s�r�ct�ar�, �h� �er��C�r��t�+ Fii��act� w��l' i�r�� r��t��`��r� ���� ���� ��t�v;�i�s s��� pur�c5�: of
��sll��ra�� ��rk �� �i�i��.�� � ��r���ra�y o� ���#��r°,�n� �a�ks.
�'h� �r�����d ��t��ati�±� {��rl� ����r�v�r�r}r�t �r�� �nd ��v�r ae�es� �ra�s} is a r�o�-
�r�a�s:����t�v� �s� of ��k�+�ra�� ���a-�. T��� �nGt+���;�r� .� c��s7stc��t +�ik� ���� f��r�c�t�r� �f
��rl�vaa�r ��rk �nd i:s ���sid�.r�� � ���� �n�t r�c����t.
I� c�;����sao�, t6�� ����os�d �uEEiva�� ��c�ad ��+��� �3ri��� ��p?���r��;nl� �r�j�c� wi�i ��a��
�c� �dv���� ���� tc� �c:kk�+i�i�e�, fe�[����s, �r ����'ik���e� �� ��al�i�r�n ��:�+�, ��c� �t��u� w�rM ��°v�
� c1�: ��nl�ss im�,��� t+� ti}�� ���tj�� ��f� ��sc��arc�.
�irccYrcly,
}f, f ...��
���f' ����.��""���� . ��J,��`��f���y��v
1
- _ # �p � ,r+
�I�`i�[�����, J��i`���� L.���
'�i�°e�tr�r of ��rk��� �?�c���at>+�n
ct_; �ttv� 'k�'or��y — �`M�y t�� �p�k�r�� �"�9��y
C�o-i� ��ic�c��ti -- �'A '�t�t� �'�r�s
�ir� �i��g��el�p -� ��12�� �lill
�hr�rJ���+? ������t� � �`��;�* �il
�Ceik�� f���r�i�� �- V'�'����T
��I��I� V��i�e � V'���7�T
F}��,stnr��,.�
oF y F' `�
w �
n
��'�1969��y
WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION CO1vIMIS
� � � �1 �� �
�r'versr'cfe Stat� Park
9719 W. ChQr[es RoQd, NIf1C MTIB Fq�rS� Washin�ton 9402b {509) 4b5-50b4 �J�j ��jQ1/ � � ���Z f
Jnrernet Address: htt�:!lwrvw.parks.wu.gov �� � wi
T1JD(Teleeommuni«tions f?evi�e for the DeQf): (3b0) 753-�036
�y_______�__._----r....
Noveinber 2, 2012
Craig Aldworth, P.E.
City Hall
11707 East S�rague A�enue
Spokane Valley, WA 992p6
Subject: Sullivan Road West Bridge Replacement Projeet—Sulli�an Park
The City of Spokaue Va11ey Depaittnent of Public Works is proposing to replace the existing
Sullivan Road West Bridge (southboimd bi•idge). This project will impact Suliivar� Park with
approxir�ateiy 5,70Q sq. ft. of permanent ir�pact and approximately sq. ft, of
ternporary impact,
The pei7nanent impacts are due to the widening of the Sulli�a�i Road West Sridge necessary to
accommodate four lanes of traffic and to widen the space between the two bridges (so�thbound
and northbound) to meet State standards for bridge rnauitenance requu�ements, resulting in minor
i•ight-of-way acqi�isition. Also, a�i eight-foot wide ri�er access trail will be pro�ided from
Sulli�an Park to the river. Due to the minor amount of pubiiciy-owned recreational lai�d
permanent�y impacted, and the added benefit of a new ri�er access t�ail for public use, the
proposed 4(� �se is beiieficia] in nature and will not adversely affect the features, attrib�tes or
acti�ities qua�ifying Sullivan Park for protection under Section 4{�.
The proposed temporary impacts caused by constiuction easements for access and staging areas
are a minor i��pact in nature and magnitude to Sulliva�i Park. Because tlie City of Spokai�e
ValIey has agreed to replace the tui�f area th�t will be occupied by the proposed const�uction
staging area and because these improvements to Sullivan Park wiil be done prior to construction
and be available for public use; the City of Spok�ne Valley Parks Department does not anticipate
permanent ad�erse physical �mpacts to Sullivan Paxk. Improvements will double the size of
existing tiu�f area and wil l inciude parking lat resuifacing if needed, and park landscaping
restoration to a condition which is at least as good as that which existed prior to the project.
Because the park improvers�ents wi11 be a�ailabie to the pub�ic pi�ior to bridge consh�iiction, the
temporary impacts wili not inteifere with the acti�ities or puipose of Sulli�an Park on either a
tem�araiy or pei�rnanent basis.
Tlie proposed mitigation(park improvement area and river access trail) is a non-h•ansportation
use of Suliivan Park. Tlie mitigation is consistent with the function of Sulli�an Park and is
considered a park enhancernent.
In conclusion, the pro�osed Sullivan Road West Bridge Replacement Project will�zave no
advei•se effect to activities, features, or attributes to Sullivaii Paik, and thus will have a de
minimis impact to this Section 4(f} resource.
Sincerely �
�
C��is Guidotti
Riverside ,Area Manager
9711 W Charles Rd.
� Nuie Mile Falls, WA 99026
(509) 465-5064
Concui7•ence letter
C: Chris GuidottilWashington 5tate Parks
Steve WorlcylCity of Spokane Valley
.Tim�ingfieldlCH2M H[LL
Marlena Guh]ke/CH2M HILL
Keith MartinIWSDOT
Mclanie Vancc/WSDOT
�t��g'Arl��
�
O� e� y
� � P�
� � �
?}� Y
� � 1,,'
f�'�1lBy��
WASHI�IGT4�l STATE PARKS ANQ RECREATI4N ��MMISSI4N
River°side Stcrte �ar°k
97!i W. Char[es Road, Nrne Mile Falls, Y6�ashington 99026 (509)9G5-5064
InternetAddress: http:ll+vww.parks.wa.gov
7aD (7e[ecommunicatrons Device for the De�f): (3G0) 753-203b
Craig Aldwa�tF�, P.E.
City Hal!
11707 East Sprague Avenue
Spakane Valley,WA 9920b
Subject: Sullivan Raad West Bridge Replacement Praject—State-owned Parce�s 45115.9034,
45123.9010,45114.9032 and 45234.9012.
The City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Warks is proposing to replace the existing Sulli�an Road
West Sridge (south�ound bridge),This project will impa�t state-owned parcels as follows:
Parcel No. Parcel�escriptlon Amount of Land to Be Used
, [square faatageJ
7emporary Permanent
45115,9034 SUlllvan Park* 33,7a2.$ 5,9$2.4
45123.9010 Undeveloped parcel(has existing 12,027.1 None
easement with C1ty of Spokane Valley
for stormwater infil[ration area)
45114,9032 Centennial Trail 5,923.1 2,181.5
45123.9012 Centennial Trail 3,661.8 iVone
*Addressed in City of Spokane Valley and Washington Sta[e Parks letter,dated,November 2,2p12
The permanent impacts are due to the widening af the Sullivan Road West Bridge necessary ta
accommodate four lanes af traffic and ta widen the space between the two bridges (sout�bound and
northaound) ta meet State standards for bridge maintenance requirements, resulting in minor right-of- �
way acquisition in Parcel No. 45114.9032. Due to the minor amount of publicly-owned recreationaf land
permanently impacted, and the use of these lands and the Centennial Trail will nat be affected; the
propased 4(f� use will not adversely affect the features, attributes ar activities qua[ifying Sullivan ParK
for protection under Section 4(fJ.
The proposed temparary impacts caused by temporary constructian permits and activities are a minor
impact in nature and magnitude to the Centennial Trail and to these state-owned recreational
praperties.The Centennial Trail will remain in operatian during bridge canstruction except for�rief
periods of time due to the proximity af the trail to planned canstruction activities.A temporary
enclosure will be constructed along eacF� side and above the trail to pratect trail users from falling
objects and to constrain trail users fram entering the construction zone. The enclosure will extend alang
the trai!thraugh the canstructian area and from a paint west of the contracto�s temporary work trestle
to a point east of the east edge of the existing northbound bridge structure. During short-term trail
closure periods, trail traffic will be detoured around the closure area.
Due to the minor amount of publicly-owned recreational land permanently impacted and that the
Centennial Trail will remain in public use throughout and after the bridge construction project;the
proposed 4�fl use will not adversely affect the features,attributes or activities qualifying these
recreational properties for protection under 5ection 4(f).
8ecause the Gity of 5pokane Valley has agreed to maintain Centennial Trail operation during
construction,will build and remove a protective enclos�re over the trail, provide a trail detour when
needed, and will restore disturbed ground to conditions which is at least as good as that which existed
prior to the project; the Washington State Parks and Recreation Department does not anticipate
permanent adverse physical impacts to the Centenniai Trail and these properties.The temporary
impacts will not interfere with the activities or purpose of the Centennial Trail or of these properties on
either a temporary or permanent basis.
The proposed mitigation �prote�tive trail�overing and detours when neCessary for short periods of
time) is a non-transportation use of these properties.The mitigation is consistent with the function of
the Centennial Trail and these properties.
In conclusion,the proposed SuHivan Road West Bridge Replacement Project will have no adverse effect
to activities, features, or attributes to the Centennial Trail or these state-owned properties, and thus will
have a de minimis impact to this Section 4(f) resource.
Si erel
. �
Chrls Guid tii
Riverside Area Manager
97i 1 W Gharles Rd.
Nine Mife Falls, WA 99�26
(509) 465-5064 ehris._ uido�ti�parks.wa.aov
Concurrence letter
C: Chris Guidatti/Washington State Parks
Steve Worfey/Clty afSpokane Valley
Jlm Dingfield/CH2M HILL
Marlena Guhlke/CH2M HILL
Keith Martin/WSDOT
Melan�e Vance/WSDOT
ATTACHMENT C
Public Involvement
MEETING SUMMARY CH2MHILL
Sullivan Road West Bridge Replacement Project
Public Meeting #1
AnEN�EES: Steve Worley/City of Spokane Jim Dingfield/CH2M HILL
Valley Mark Brower/CH2M HILL
Craig Aldworth/ City of See attached Sign-In Sheet for all
Spokane Valley attendees.
Carolbelle Branch/City of
Spokane Valley
FROM: Mark Brower/CH2M HILL
MEETING DATE/TIME: JariUaPy Z5,2012,6:00 pm to 7:30 pm
MEETWG LOCATION: CeritePPlaCe,ROOTTl 1�9
2426 N. Discovery Place
Spokane Valley,WA 99216
A public meeting was held to introduce the Sullivan Road Bridge Replacement Project and
solicit public and stakeholder input prior to developing bridge replacement concepts.
Design Team Presentation
Craig Aldworth,the City's project manager,introduced the project team, and provided
information about the makeup of traffic on the Sullivan Road corridor,the existing bridge
condition,and steps the City is taking to ease the weight restrictions on the bridge
temporarily,until the bridge may be replaced.
Jim Dingfield,the consultant team project manager,continued the presentation by
highlighting project goals and key objectives:
Primary Goal:
• Replace existing 2-lane southbound bridge with a 4-lane structure.
Key Objectives:
• Maintain acceptable traffic flow during construction
• Maintain access to local businesses
• Maintain access to Centennial Trail,Sullivan Park
• Maintain access to river users
• Bridge construction anticipated to begin in 2014
• Integrate context sensitive aesthetic and public art features?
1
PUBLIC MEETING#1
Jim reviewed a number of project issues and challenges as they are anticipated and
understood,including:
Minimizing Impacts to:
• Sullivan Park
• Centennial Trail
• Local Businesses
• River Use
• Fish&Wildlife
• Utilities
• Freight Mobility
• Travelling Public
Environmental Documentation & Permitting to Protect:
• Recreational Properties,4(f)
• Fish and Fish Habitat
• Cultural Resources,Sect. 106
• Noise
• Aesthetics
• Hazardous Materials
• Wetlands
• Sole Source Aquifer
• Monitoring Well
Jim noted that one of the key challenges will be to accomplish the replacement,while
minimizing impacts to the travelling public and freight movers. The City would like to
maintain acceptable levels of traffic flow during replacement of the bridge. Jim described
some initial traffic staging alternatives that may be considered to meet this priority. The
initial alternatives include:
1. Two-Stage Replacement of SB Bridge
2. Temporary Traffic Bridge
3. Roll-in-Place Bridge
4. Widening of NB Bridge
a) Maintain One Lane in Each Direction on NB Bridge
b) Maintain Two SB,One NB Lane on NB Bridge
Jim discussed the importance of maintaining access to and use of the Centennial trail and
Sullivan park, and discussed some initial ideas on how to safely provide access during
construction.
Mark Brower provided an overview of the bridge design process,including environmental
documentation and permitting, and right of way. It is the intent to complete the process
and have a project ready to bid to contractors in fall/winter of 2013,for construction
beginning in 2014. The City will actively coordinate with the public throughout this process
in a variety of ways.
2
PUBLIC MEETING#1
Public Comments and Questions
At the completion of the presentation,questions were entertained from the audience. The
following is a summary of questions and comments:
Larry Rider,Deputy Chief, Spokane Valley Fire District
Fire Department:
1. We would hope that the design and coordination can allow the bridge to be built
faster than the Barker Bridge.
2. We need the ability to turn east and west onto Indiana from Sullivan.
3. We would like to see more room to float under the construction bridge,mainly in
the width of the opening.
4. We would like to see better and safer access to the river take out points for
floaters. If they are up current of the new bridges,it becomes unsafe because if
they miss the take out,they end up in the in a bad location under the bridges.
5. We would like to see better information and signage for the take out points,
maybe a map hanging to advise them where to go.
6. We would like to see the trail stay open under both the new bridge and
construction bridge during construction, as opposed to re-routing the trail to the
Indiana intersection.
As A Citizen of the Valley:
1. I would like to see a pedestrian bridge built downstream of the new bridge or
under it to go from the trail to the park. Let's get the pedestrians off the top of
the bridge. When you look at our bridges,they are impassable in the winter to
pedestrians. We plow the snow onto the sidewalks and it doesn t go into the
river,it just piles up.And I want us to get something permanent for the money
and allow the bridge to be narrower.
2. Build a 41ane bridge designed so that it can be two lanes each way when the
other bridge needs to be replaced.
3. I can live with one lane each way for about 18 months, so don t spend money on
widening the east bridge,just get it done faster.
River Users (Kayakers)
1. Specify river access openings and not allow work bridge to have"strainers°
2. Request improving East-west access along river bank on the north side of the
river under the bridges. Access is currently constrained by chain link fence
around sewer.
3. Current popular takeout points are:
North side, �200 feet downstream of SB Bridge centerline
North side even with west side of west bridge
North side, �200 feet upstream of east side of east bridge
4. Also like the idea of a downstream pedestrian bridge,per Larry's suggestion.
5. Appreciated Spokane County's willingness to change pier location during design
to accommodate a special kayak feature in the river. No such features are
present near the Sullivan Road bridge.
6. Asked if Fire Department response time would be impacted by this project?
Larry noted that they were very used to a number of constraints in responding,
including traffic, at grade railroad crossings,and river crossings. They have fire
stations on both sides of the project.
3
PUBLIC MEETING#1
Graham Construction, Bridge Contractor
1. Design and award construction contract quickly to take advantage of the
cutthroat bidding climate.
2. The cheapest and fastest option(besides total closure) will be putting all traffic
on NB bridge,21ane or 3lanes.
Western Dance Center
1. Requested design that would not impact Sullivan Park north parking lot.
2. Need to minimize impacts to Sullivan Park. How far will impacts extend in to
park? This has yet to be determined,but the environmental process will ensure
that impacts are minimized to the extent practicable.
3. Also like the idea of a downstream pedestrian bridge,per Larry's suggestion.
Jim Dingfield expressed that a separate pedestrian structure will likely be more costly than
providing a sidewalk and bicycle lane on the new bridge because of the additional
foundation costs. A separate pedestrian structure may not be eligible for funding under the
federal bridge program funds secured for the bridge replacement. If so, other funding
sources would need to be found for this to become a reality.
Attendees were encouraged to provide written comments via comment forms, sticky notes,
or by e-mailing Craig Aldworth directly at: caldworth@spokanevalley.org
4
SUL.L.IVAN BRIDGE PRELIMINARY DESiGN COMMl1NiTY MEETING
2�-Jan-12
Si n-in Sheet - lease rint c[earl
,,.
Name;% � addr ei state zi hon� email
,�<< ��i� ' �- /� '�Z-� - ��
�,��s� s1.�-- •n�, _.{�an.-� -- �'' z l�^� 2��l���I�01 ;
�y/ !' / r // /� ! �7C� / �� // b
itG�/i ��. % �L'--Pl� v3iC/ �", l Gc- G•�i ��Gl`-"�[� ii�-tC�� L✓�� � CC7 v 11G - / ��� i r� G-L �.�i6'fi4itw-(!cr/f� i'L� f'�
/���r��ti �'''r`�i.�r' � 3�
� • q ( �
f � ,n 1 i � f: f-•
v,t� ! n ✓
rLL y� � pi � 1
�� � 'J .U.�f ` J�G+ � .LY �� S t D � I W �I
' •�1(� ' � o �` , s r��t.�'t� �r� '.0 7 �
}�(�'c�ic�1 w���s ��-ra��, r�1 �.� �- ;� � � � �� �„1, �G 2 7 = �c��' �� G ��,-i�t
�G''�(/fc- C�!'e,,,^���Lr � �Z-7 � l� • �J i'�c''L L`✓'�Ch j ��/ r G��` Q [.�G�_ �' Z l
�J �,y�^ J'-F��c. �o��� z ����� , ✓��y �� � '�^ ^. � ���, G,��° �. � 7�,� �5 `^l.``t
i7(N�O NL ..2. .L i IG� >�' S CJ�C � A �v� `f=.' Z.-J-! �1 S `Cr�(+��i
<. 'd .. - . . .'"
. .. (
^ , /J.
/, �
� _ c �..,, �
�' '� '�z�,r. - '�� ' '� `' favSGlI�4[��V�'1,� � �!ti-�l�-��l�r-Lc^^v�
� C�-%%� �� 9l��./1? / '7^ _�� �✓�- ��f � -� ;' ,�✓ - �tir� �c'��
- ` �/�- - c 3i�5 �s G� � U <r�c— i�/�- zz� .�.�1�� s �/e'�i.�� � �/�, c _
.l r� r�%i'�t7c.�( !8�/,S��r.,p�t.:_ .��/ - l.-✓a!' J��/� Z�-�z�b J� � ro:.c` �.. ;�yl�./ca'�I
SUL.RIVAN BRIDGE PREL�MINARY DESIGN COMMUNITY MEETING
25-Jan-12
Si n�in Sheet- {ease rynt clearl
Name address ci state zi hone email..�`
%�"i r/1 'l� � !7 !— � C:cJi/ J �/ � Z� ��7� � f —t'U q�l�
� � � r . � � � � L' e 5 vll„ w � �I
' �..lL i�� �, � j�� `C. ��^9G�-r�Pa�c C�L(,—�s�-��� � �L � `� ` �'
/ �•-� �� t LA P �. C� f�r 8 t7 n � S C7�C?.✓S e f.�d� � � �� L) �t7
-.�/•c�� ��c�r r a�e�- �� d�d�c�1. ,�a�`` 5",���.<-..e. L�� 3L�- �°'7�
MEETING SUMMARY
PROJECT: SULLIVAN ROAD WEST BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
PROJECT NO.: 428859
MEETING DATE&TIME: February 15,2012 1:30 p.m.
Attendees: Craig Aldworth(City Public Works, PM) Steve Worley(City Public Works)
Jim Dingfield(CH2M HILL,PM) Mike Stone(City Parks)
Marlena Guhlke(CH2M HILL, Env. Lead) Scott Kuhta(City Planning)
Mark Brower(CH2M HILL, Design Lead) Lori Barlow(City Planning)
Karin Divens(WDFW) Jacob McCann(DNR)
Michael Maher(DOE) Chris Guidotti(WA State Parks)
Tim Erkel(USACE) Bill McCammon(WSDOT H&LP)
Bob Newman(USFWS, Region 1)
Meeting Summary Notes —Agency Coordination Meeting
INTRODUCTIONS
• Invitees absent from the meeting: Karin Divens(WDFW), Randy Abrahamson (Spokane Tribe), Craig Holstine
(WSDOT), and Juliet Barenti(USFW)
BACKGROUND
• Craig Aldworth opened the meeting,thanked the attendees for making time to assist, and provided the overall
purpose of the meeting:
1. Provide an overview of the bridge replacement project
2. Solicit input on initial bridge replacement concepts
3. Review the preliminary project schedule to determine any potential problems
4. Identify key permitting issues and obtain suggestions for resolution
5. Coordinate and commit to a path forward to enable the City to pursue critical funding with implementation
timeline restrictions.
• Craig and Jim Dingfield reviewed the existing Sullivan Road West Bridge condition, and discussed the overall
goal and objectives of the project. The City is looking to replace the 2-lane west bridge with a 4-lane structure.
• Jim summarized that the key issue with developing a preliminary design for this project is understanding the
best way to replace the bridge,while accommodating acceptable levels of traffic during construction. He
provided background on three initial traffic staging alternatives under consideration:
o Two-stage replacement of the existing bridge
o Temporary traffic bridge upstream of the northbound bridge
o Modification of the northbound bridge to accept 3-lanes of traffic
• Jim emphasized that the project schedule(handout)is accelerated, and is critical to being both eligible to
compete for and receive federal grant funding for the project. The project must be"shovel-ready" to obligate
funding by June 30,2013. This means that the NEPA documentation must be accepted, design complete,and
right-of-way certified by this date! The team's schedule illustrates how this may be achieved, but needs
validation and support from the agencies to make it happen.
Roundtable Discussion
• Marlena Guhlke led a group discussion focused on the proposed timeline for each key activity in the NEPA ECS
and permitting process for the project.
o Bill McCammon confirmed that if the City plans on using federal monies to acquire right-of-way,that NEPA
approval is required prior to initiating the acquisition process. He cautioned that overstepping this element
Updated February 22,2012
\\bbh\Proj\SpokaneValleyCityOf\4288595ullivanBridge\SR_PreliminaryDesign\04-StakeholderCoord_and_Public0utreach\Environmental Coordination Meeting#1�Agency Coordination
Meeting#1 Notes.doc Page 1
MEETING SUMMARY
PROJECT: SULLIVAN ROAD WEST BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
PROJECT NO.: 428859
has caused problems for local projects recently, and suggested that we coordinate with WSDOT closely on
advancing this aspect.
o Bill McCammon inquired as to whether a VE was planned? After some discussion, it is apparent that a VE
for this project would focus on the traffic/construction staging aspects. Bill offered that the City should draft
a letter outlining the nature of the budget for this project, anticipated project costs, and that a full VE may
not be justified, due to the limited scope required.
NEPA-BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION:
o Bob Newman noted that the schedule appeared adequate for this process and he anticipates a rapid
turnaround. He would like to leverage knowledge from the recent Appleway bridge project, and expedite
the review process on his end.
o He noted that Bull Trout/Red-Band Rainbows are the species of interest, and that if impact driving of piling
is anticipated—bubbler curtains may be mitigation (similar to Appleway). Extent of the curtain system
required is dependent on the acoustic calculations that must be performed. Piling size, impact attenuation
("pile blocking")are key factors.
o Bob discussed the presence of Bull Trout, and noted that we can't re-test for the absence of the species.
Presence has been documented.
o Bob said that a"formal" BA was not required but the information provided to him should have the facts
needed and be comprehensive enough so that an agency decision can be made. Bill McCammon will
coordinate with Bob and Marlena to"right-size" the document to suit the project needs. This may mean
including Kelsey Stacie (from WSDOT's Olympia office)in the discussions. The document needs to include
how stormwater will be handled during construction because discharge to the river is not allowed.
o Marlena noted that we will work with Karin Divens to mitigate any potential in-water work required outside of
the allotted fish window. Bob wanted to be included in those discussions regarding any work conducted
outside of the designated fish window for construction. Usually, he goes along with whatever mitigation is
decided as appropriate by WDFW.
NEPA-SECTION 4F COMPLIANCE:
o Bill McCammon suggested that we approach the impacts to public facilities(to include Sullivan Park and
the Centennial Trail)to achieve a"de minimis"finding. This generally means that impacts to the use of the
park are negligible(both during construction, and after project completion). City/State Parks will need to
concur with this finding, in writing.
o Bill noted that a public comment period and input will be required.
o Bill will work with us to make an initial determination. If a"de minimis"finding is not possible, and if certain
project criteria applies;we may need to follow the"Programmatic"4F process,whereby alternatives are
evaluated to ascertain and document the best path forward. For those projects that don't meet the
programmatic criteria,a more lengthy process is required that includes a legal sufficiency review and
concurrence by the Department of Interior. This may result in an expanded schedule beyond what we are
currently showing.
o Both Chris and Mike agreed that the parkland should not be used for a staging area,and if it was used for
that purpose, it is unlikely that a de minimis designation could be obtained for the project. The WSDOT
property north of Sullivan Park was mentioned as a potential staging area as well as commercial property
both north and south of the project.
o Because Section 4(fl requires maintenance of public use, to obtain a de minimis designation, it will be
important to not interfere with park's lease terms with the Dance Hall.
Updated February 22,2012
\\bbh\Proj\SpokaneValleyCityOf\4288595ullivanBridge\SR_PreliminaryDesign\04-StakeholderCoord_and_Public0utreach\Environmental Coordination Meeting#1�Agency Coordination
Meeting#1 Notes.doc Page 2
MEETING SUMMARY
PROJECT: SULLIVAN ROAD WEST BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
PROJECT NO.: 428859
o Chris Guidotti noted that he preferred to see a hard covering over the Centennial trail,as opposed to re-
routing the trail to the Sullivan/lndiana intersection. He also appreciated the efforts to ensure that non-
motorized facilities are provided at all times for access across the river.
o Chris suggested that the existing take-out point at Sullivan Park is in poor condition, and is difficult for river
users. If the contractor would be accessing the project via Sullivan Park, he would like to see the access
restored such that a more formal take-out is developed that improves river access, provides a safer access,
and mitigates erosion.
o Mike Stone concurred with Chris's suggestion, and offered that the public may expect this type of
improvement from the project.
o Chris Guidotti suggested that if State Park land acquisition is needed for the project,we need to be working
with the State Park lands group early, in order to keep our timeline. We will need to show how the property
"take"will not interfere with existing park uses and activities during and after construction. Potential
enhancements should be considered (e.g., turning the steep slope facing the park into a"climbing wall").
o Bill McCammon noted that providing a hard cover over the trail would likely be preferred, but we need to
pay special attention to safety and security elements, such as lighting, ventilation, etc.
NEPA-SECTION 1061CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT:
o Marlena was hoping that Randy Abrahamson would be in attendance. She will coordinate with Randy to
ascertain his initial thoughts for work in this area. Bill McCammon suggested that an onsite meeting might
be appropriate.
o Bill McCammon will be the go-between with this element, as with all of the NEPA elements. Once an APE
has been determined and approved by WSDOT and FHWA, he will send out a notification letter to the
Tribes, and DAHP. We will need concurrence on the APE from these agencies before we perform the field
survey.
o We need to include a 30-day comment period from the tribe(s)and DAHP once we submit the APE
notification letters.
o The bridge under consideration for replacement may be eligible to be listed on historic registers. The
historical nature and characteristics of the bridge will be included in the cultural resources assessment
(CRA)and a determination will be made at that time.
o Bill noted that if any artifacts are found during the CRA, our timeline will be greatly impacted.
NEPA-TECHNICAL MEMOS TO SUPPORT CE:
o Bill McCammon noted that we should probably add an Air Quality Analysis to the list. No Environmental
Justice review is warranted because the location is essentially the same with the same impacts to
population as the existing bridge and we are not planning to close the bridge corridor and implement a
major detour.
o Bill suggested that we will need to coordinate with Harold White(WSDOT Planning)with regard to the
transportation analyses,due to the immediate proximity to the I-90 interchange at Sullivan Road.
PERMITS-DNR EASEMENT AUTHORIZATION:
o Jacob McCann is researching to see if there are existing agreements in place for Sullivan Bridge.
o Jacob noted that the process for granting new easements has been changing within DNR in recent years
(since Barker Bridge). There are more habitat stewardship requirements considered now that may include
specific work windows, require light penetration, and other mitigations to protect benthic species. That said,
Jacob is optimistic that because this is an existing bridge and roadway corridor, and that the bridge is
Updated February 22,2012
\\bbh\Proj\SpokaneValleyCityOf\4288595ullivanBridge\SR_PreliminaryDesign\04-StakeholderCoord_and_Public0utreach\Environmental Coordination Meeting#1�Agency Coordination
Meeting#1 Notes.doc Page 3
MEETING SUMMARY
PROJECT: SULLIVAN ROAD WEST BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
PROJECT NO.: 428859
relatively high above the water(as opposed to a dock or pier), that many of these requirements may not
apply.
o Jacob noted that while the process and public review period moves along, DNR will not finalize the access
permit until all other permits have been completed. However, the public comment part of the process can
be conducted early-on so that once all permits are issued, the DNR easement can be issued immediately.
o Jacob will investigate whether temporary structures/work trestles need to be covered in the access
easement agreement.
o Jacob will also investigate how the need to increase right-of-way(ROW)area from the existing ROW might
affect the easement procedures; however, it was pointed out that a similar situation occurred on the Barker
Road Bridge without any difficulty.
PERMITS-SEPA CHECKLIST:
o The City of Spokane Valley is the lead agency for SEPA.
o Lori Barlow questioned the process in proceeding towards a documented categorical exclusion (CE)vs. an
environmental assessment(EA)or environmental impact statement(EIS). The group concurred that the
determination of significance process is the same at this stage for all of these potential environmental
evaluation outcomes. It is anticipated that a CE determination will be applicable for this project,and that
mitigation measures can be identified and applied to the project as appropriate for a CE determination.
o She noted that the City permitting process does not typically add requirements to any project, but allows for
a formalized opportunity for public appeal of the process. There will be no shorelines public meeting (the
City's decision can be made administratively by the planning department), but there will be public
notification and a 30-day public comment period.
o Mike Maher noted that there were river bank erosion impacts on the previous Barker Road Bridge project
that were not anticipated in the process. Marlena Guhlke noted that while some unanticipated elements
came up, they were fully mitigated. Jim Dingfield offered that these are examples of lessons learned, and
that we will address them in this project proactively.Actions may include the addition of specific contract
language that would limit obstructions in the river, or may include temporary armoring of the river banks to
protect them during construction with removal and restoration to existing conditions.
o Mike Stone offered that we will need to clearly illustrate how we may improve river access at Sullivan Park
(what will be the outcome), throughout the process, to avoid any misunderstandings by the public.
PERMITS-STATE WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION:
o Mike Maher suggested that the timeline and process seemed reasonable, but cautioned that unforeseen
things may come up.
PERMITS-CORPS OF ENGINEERS SECTION 404 PERMIT:
o Tim Erkel suggested that the timeline and process depicted are reasonable. He agreed that a categorical
exclusion designation for this project would result in the issuance of a Nationwide Permit(NWP)for the
bridge replacement project. No significant issues from his perspective.
OVER-ALL AGENCY INPUT
Updated February 22,2012
\\bbh\Proj\SpokaneValleyCityOf\4288595ullivanBridge\SR_PreliminaryDesign\04-StakeholderCoord_and_Public0utreach\Environmental Coordination Meeting#1�Agency Coordination
Meeting#1 Notes.doc Page 4
MEETING SUMMARY
PROJECT: SULLIVAN ROAD WEST BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
PROJECT NO.: 428859
o Steve Worley asked the group if there was any reason to believe that the City cannot achieve this
aggressive timeline. Recognizing that we are early in the process, there was general consensus from the
group that the June 2013 deadline can be met.
NEXT STEPS
• Jim Dingfield reviewed the next key project steps, and thanked the group for a productive and encouraging meeting:
o Analyze &Evaluate Alternatives
o Refine Preferred Alternative
o Initiate NEPA Documentation
Updated February 22,2012
\\bbh\Proj\SpokaneValleyCityOf\4288595ullivanBridge\SR_PreliminaryDesign\04-StakeholderCoord_and_Public0utreach\Environmental Coordination Meeting#1�Agency Coordination
Meeting#1 Notes.doc Page 5
AGENCY COORDINATiQN MEETING
Cit y of Spokane Valley
Sullivan Road West Bridge Replacement Prajec�
February �5, 2012 1:30 p.m.
Name C8m an i Rd�ress P#�one No. Fax Nn, E-mail Address
J, �'2-`�, ���..._-- �,h'a,n���.� �
L �•-,�l•��C-�'6�O ?� � �``' S'�{� �' � 5'"�Yb �°a �.�� - ?2� I ZS�z.- I S a7 c1-�2�..�., c�,..1
a a�6 °I z.x�
;���.�. �.,�.rr '_"' i'--��sc`' � �'. �C,. . _,�t�.�
I
,s ,�� ��^�`� ���{,,�4���-,'��'`i } �j - �-
_ f--�"7+��-�', � �,-�jG31�l:t'Ih,� �V�E�X'�/��� , C,V � �=�L�' . 4:�C..�,t i.��t��+.��`.i� l:Jy��
1�SZld� �E/l Lar�L �ieo6�nf -`Q�/ �� rA'cc�4rrrM� .
�LL /��JC�I'�7►f�� � Lvi4-GO�
fl� .r.�cr���
� VS�cc.^r++ �»►-�
/ „n �C2��FL uSac� Z3U'- S�S'7a Y '
���b� ri�c�.,-•._�-..
��O� /V�{�./ '(.t.�t"-''� �t S �(�r/S ��/,3 - ��/ � Q �'�,.�S � ��/
, -
I t� . ...,' .i I i ' . . 9 - ._I � I 4.,3` I `
I`y ,. �� t��_ r L;' i �- .,i ; _ . ��t _. �r + {f.� . . � - �I
_ i i .la�
_ ] ��. _ � ' �
I , � � f�� . �_• -�,' ..� �c-.
. ._�_ � l ( � , �
.'� .. � �v� '�`� 1 � Z �_ � �' "%�_, � , 1 � �,
_'� ,•�. �i� C
{ � ' � l {
�`1 c. ti r ��e G`l1~ `�s� � r-h�ty. U�c���Q ,�s. .�
'3
. �r �� ` , .�. . ��, �' -
'�b �� ������ ����`._��C�� �.���'ti� `��r_�;`� �-� C!�., e'��ti �;� �`I�� ���� T�• �� �cti�=�� ��1� �1 �::. r
� ��C:�C� �v �,�a �1
l�bbhlProlSpo�caneValleyCit}OM28859SuiNan9ridqe�SR_PrellminaryOeslQn�04-.SlakeholderCoord_and_Pub�bOuireachlEnvlronmental Coordinallon Mee�lrg dt1SRWBR S�n In.DOC
������ ���J"���IY��d�IV �'���1 fY�
�r���' ?J� �f�U�r��1�' �����'y
����a��n .��a� ��,�� ��;��� �������r�r��� �"��E
���r��r� 1�� ��1� 1_3�} � rr�
� �'� P��. �i� �I A+��
� } �� � ��� ����
�� .
�� -��'� ��.� � ����� �_�'
- �!V°5.J }� �,.f I� � � t."'
� �� �i• �
k� �� _ , � ;'�,_` r .-C� _y•4'��. �°'+a1'ti� �
�x � ��''�' ' �jrr+�r��� r''r
_ , _ _a
� �.I��.�i �!�_�
— � . �. •- • r.
� t T I i L. °� _ :s l ��, . �� + � - .. . .. �'i
� : x�,��,�,.�, . � - � -n � d' �Y��'�.�•_�-
!�,",�.i� r:. � .
�4-W r,., . . , �
_ _ _ �
� . �.�«�.. - +j4��� ,� ..I
1 k �,i.a �- i,i '. � i1•_�.�� - ' F,
�PI�! .�_
V
I
�
- — - -:- — —__
"rA�i�,SFMaf�w�'��rh+{X►�2w+i9R'+#r.•�M'+4+��9Ar+�M�-��+�`�+rd1�d_�L4���E����1 C�tild�on MI�F��i4�I��A 55�+i�ti O0�
MEETING SUMMARY CH2MHILL
Sullivan Road West Bridge Replacement Proj ect
Public Meeting #2
AnEN�EES: Steve Worley/City of Spokane Jim Dingfield/CH2M HILL
Valley Mark Brower/CH2M HILL
Craig Aldworth/ City of See attached Sign-In Sheet for all
Spokane Valley attendees.
Carolbelle Branch/City of
Spokane Valley
FROM: Mark Brower/CH2M HILL
MEETWG DATE/TIME: j�/jarC�l 14,ZOZZ, C:OO 1JTTl t0 7:30 pTTl
MEETING LOCATION: CeritePPlaCe,ROOTTl ZZO
2426 N. Discovery Place
Spokane Valley,WA 99216
A public meeting was held to present and discuss bridge replacement concepts considered,
discuss the preliminary preferred alternative concept, and solicit public and stakeholder
input prior to finalizing the selection of the preferred alternative and identify recommended
refinements.
Design Team Presentation
Craig Aldworth,the City's project manager,introduced the project team, and let attendees
know where we are in the process, and that the team was eager to receive comments on the
initial bridge replacement concepts.
Jim Dingfield,the consultant team project manager,reminded attendees that one of the key
objectives and challenges is to accomplish the replacement,while minimizing impacts to the
travelling public and freight movers. The City would like to maintain acceptable levels of
traffic flow during replacement of the bridge. Jim presented the five bridge replacement
concepts analyzed for consideration:
1. Two-Stage Replacement of SB Bridge
2. Temporary Traffic Bridge
3. Permanent Widening of NB Bridge to 4-Lanes
4. Reconfiguration of NB Bridge to 3-Lanes (one 11' NB lane,two 11' SB lanes)
4-Mod. Reconfiguration of NB Bridge to 3-Lanes (one 12' NB lane, one 11' SB through lane,
and one 12' through lane)
Jim discussed how each alternative would be constructed, and included some of the key
considerations for each,including impacts to traffic,impacts to use of public space,costs,
right-of-way impacts,environmental impacts, and construction schedule impacts.
1
PUBLIC MEETING#2
Matt Ewers noted that he was happy to see that the replacement bridge has 4-lanes.
Jim informed the attendees that the City and design team are currently favoring Alternative
4 and 4-modified. These alternatives have minimal impacts on the environment,minimize
in-water work(less construction duration risk), and are the lowest relative cost options. He
noted that the primary difference between Alternative 4 and Alternative 4-modified is that
4-modified provides slightly more width for each lane. In order to increase the available
width on the bridge from 33' (Alt 4)to 36' (Alt 4-Mod),we will need to remove a portion of
the deck, and replace the outermost longitudinal bridge girders to provide additional
strength to accommodate the wider deck and associated loads. It is estimated that this
widening would add over $lmillion to the cost of Alternative 4.
The City is interested to hear from bridge users,including freight-dependent businesses to
understand the value of the additional lane width for this temporary condition.
Public Comments and Questions
At the completion of the presentation,Steve Worley asked the attendees to provide their
specific thoughts as to whether it was important to widen the NB bridge to achieve the
additionallane widths. The following is a summary of responses and comments:
Matt Ewers (Freight Mobility)
1. Speeds through this section of Sullivan Road are fairly low (25-30 mph) due to
congestion and the traffic light. 11-foot vs. 12-foot lanes do not make a
significant difference in his mind for large trucks moving through the project.
2. Matt noted that the reverse curves coming in to and out of the project would
need to be wider to accommodate wheel tracking for the long single trailer trucks
(53'),but the narrow lanes on the bridge are not an issue.
Mayor Towey (City of Spokane Valley)
1. Initially preferred Alternative 3, due to the benefits of the permanent widening
of the NB bridge to 4-lanes. Understanding the age-related issues with this
structure,he is supportive of Alternative 4.
2. Is there a permanent benefit to the additional3-feet on Alternative 4-modified?
What will it give us that we do not already have? Jim Dingfield responded that
the 14-foot lanes will remain the same,and the additional3-feet will provide a
permanent pedestrian walkway that will now meet current minimum standards
for width.
Councilmember Woodard(City of Spokane Valley)
1. Recognizing the issues with the spread footings on the NB bridge- are there
feasible ways to rehabilitate the NB bridge in the future, such that Alternative 3
would make more sense? Steve Worley noted that the scouring of the spread
footings are just one of a number of issues that the NB bridge currently has, and
it will have more as it ages.
2. Likes the suspended pedestrian walkway and is interested to see if we can keep
the pedestrian access under the bridge permanently, and benefit from
accommodating 3-lanes of traffic on the NB bridge?
2
PUBLIC MEETING#2
Matt Ewers (Freight Mobility)
1. How long will the current repairs on the SB bridge last? Steve Worley noted that
the recently completed girder reinforcement work on the SB bridge is intended
as a temporary solution to facilitate removal of the weight restrictions. The hope
is that the temporary reinforcements will meet the need until the bridge can be
replaced. Undoubtedly the bridge will continue to deteriorate and other
remedial measures may be needed if replacement is delayed. Girder cracking,
which is what the temporary external reinforcement addresses,is just one of a
number of issues that may cause the load restrictions to be re-imposed in the
coming years.
2. Matt suggested that we should be focused on pursuing options that are fundable
and allow for the most rapid replacement. Typically less expensive options that
we can find monies for will get us the new bridge the fastest. The additional cost
and time associated with Alternative 4-modified are not desirable from this
standpoint.
3. Mayor Towey recognized this comment, and suggested that this is why the
replacement of the bridge is the #1 priority of the City.
Mike Frucci (Washington State DOT)
1. Mike noted that the recent bridge deck rehabilitation project on I-90 (Downtown
Viaduct) included traffic revisions that restricted lane widths on the interstate to
11-feet with no"shy° distance to bridge barriers. The 11-foot width was not a
problem for the state on this project, at 45mph. He does not see an issue with the
11-foot lanes on the Sullivan Road Bridge replacement project.
2. Reducing speeds through the construction zone is advisable.
3. Cautioned that providing too wide of lanes on the NB bridge in the final
configuration(Alt 4-Mod) may be confusing to drivers or encourage higher
speeds, and suggested the added width be dedicated to the pedestrian access
route.
Mike Alm (Trooper- Washington State Patrol)
1. Noted that there is no noticeable correlation between accidents on the interstates
related to narrowed lane widths during construction.
Attendees were thanked for their helpful input and encouraged to provide any additional
comments via e-mailing Craig Aldworth directly at: caldworth@spokanevalley.org
3
SULLIVAN BRIDGE PROPOSED DESIGN S� C4NSTRUCTION ALTERNATIVES MEETNNG
14-Mar-12
Si n�in Sheet - lease rint clearl
Name address ci state zi hone emai[
oxe !o � '— e:.. �'7cI Z6� � �
� � �.
�u"� ��`:� .d.-.�� �s�,.cm..��� ! � r ' ���'�� .� �'
�I l� �aLl� .� c� . ��. �vt �°.�'�R�1 �� S. � �. �P:41.�,t �ct 4 �
��� ���.� �°�G�S 4 � " �¢� c5 � �! 7 — �� � � .J � � �a
�S � +r � 2. A.� S�s�F��.;� � S ���. V a ��e Z °! �-� �
�r� r�'�;.��� /� ��A�d�' �6'�. � e�c�r. : � `��'c�"�' 3�� C��2.� �ieRCc.�c/l.l c�Ce�.S�'�.�`�P.�.�¢�C�
�
�i . �� t��. t " '` W_ �.L .�.v-. -— �. ,a�---�r.�-�-
.��.,. �o,�r��� � �°°�� � �'.`�'". `4�� °�: �� 8 e �����.� �,�� d�F j. �
�
� �� .
�`a��..�_ ° I'r ,g+i�,�' ��'3't � ���w:h"'�z+J:?- �..-"� ��aP�a'� .f$ '�, ,�`[ '`�� �' ���'��"=':;%y`r' �.S,i�!?e-8�� rr'�y
, �. .� � �, ..
CITY PARKS MEETING NOTES
� �������� CLIENT: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
� PROJECT: SULLIVAN ROAD WEST BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
PROJECT NO.: 428859
MEETING DATE&TIME: March 8,2012 2:30 p.m.
Attendees: Craig Aldworth(City) Mark Brower(CH2M HILL)
Steve Worley(City) Marlena Guhlke(CH2M HILL)
Mike Stone(City Parks) Jim Dingfield(CH2M HILL)
NOt@S — PROJECT COORDINATION MEETING
ALTERNATIVES
• Describe Alternatives and Rationale for Selection
Jim Dingfield presented the Sullivan Road West Bridge Replacement Alternatives, and described the rationale
used during the comparison evaluation.
a. Alternative 1 —Two-Stage Replacement of Bridge
b. Alternative 2-1-Stage Replacement of Bridge with Temporary Bridge
c. Alternative 3-1-Stage Replacement of Bridge with Widening of NB Bridge(widening with piers)
d. Alternative 4-1-Stage Replacement of Bridge with Revisions to NB Bridge
e. Alternative 4(Modified)—1-Stage Replacement of Bridge with Revisions to NB (deck widening only)
ENVIRONMENTAL(SSUES
• ROW will be needed from Sullivan Park
Approximately 20-30 feet of right-of-way(ROW) will be needed at Sullivan Park(Park). An approximate outline
of the ROW was shown on an aerial map, and based on this location;most of the land would be located on the
steep hillside(which is not used by park users). A retaining wall would be installed to limit intrusion into the
Park. The property would be at its widest point where the bridge ends and the approach to the bridge begins,
and then would taper fairly quickly back to the existing Sullivan Road RO W before reaching the controlled,
lighted intersection. Action Item: The property needed for the bridge project will be identified and
presented to both City and State Parks.
• Bike Ramp Access
o Tie-In Locations
■ There is an existing ramp that connects pedestrians and bicyclists from the SB Sullivan Road
bridge to a Park trail. It was pointed out that a new ramp could be incorporated into the
project or access to the Park could be made available from a new sidewalk that will be
constructed along the west side of Sullivan Road north of the SB bridge.
• Multi-Use Path Access
o Tie-In Locations
■ The multi-use path is a 10-foot wide sidewalk that will be constructed on the new SB
replacement bridge. It will be used for both pedestrians and bicyclists. This path will continue
beyond the bridge and then taper back to a 6-foot sidewalk on Sullivan Road.
• Parking Facilities
There was discussion of parking facilities located in several potential places:
Updated March 22,2012
P:\SpokaneValleyCityOf\4288595ullivanBridge\Permitting\Meetings\Agency_Meetings\03-08-12_City_Parks_Mtg\SRWBRCityParks Mtg 1V�tes �3—�0-12.UDCXPag@ 1
CITY PARKS MEETING NOTES
� �������� CLIENT: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
� PROJECT: SULLIVAN ROAD WEST BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
PROJECT NO.: 428859
1) Use approximately one half(1/2)of the "lower parking IoY'(the one closest to the river)for a small staging
area for locating the contractor's office, a few parking spaces, and a limited amount of storage.
2)Additional parking would need to be provided elsewhere for the contractor.
3)Parking for the public would be maintained during construction because the other%portion of the lower
parking lot would be available and that should be sufficient space based on past park user experience.
• Temporary Pedestrian Bridge During Construction
o Temporary vs. Permanent
■ There will be a temporary pedestrian bridge constructed underneath the northbound(NB)
bridge for pedestrians and bicyclists to cross over the river during construction. This bridge
might become a permanent bridge. Action Item: CH2M HILL will determine if there would
be any difference in design and cost for a permanent bridge as compared to a
temporary one.
■ Mike Stone agreed that City Parks could maintain a permanent bridge related to litter pick-up
but couldn't take-on the long-term commitment of structural maintenance. Steve Worley
agreed that pedestrian bridge inspection and maintenance could be a responsibility added to
his department. Mike liked the idea of a permanent bridge that would connect the Centennial
Trail to the Park.
o Tie-In Locations
Tie-in locations for the pedestrian bridge were discussed in terms of both north and south sides of the
bridge. During construction, the trail would tie-in to Sullivan Road on the east side of the Sullivan
Road NB Bridge. On the south side, the trail would also tie-in on the eastern side of the Sullivan Road
NB Bridge, and may require an easement from Hansen to connect the sidewalk at bridge level down
to the pedestrian bridge with a slope providing ADA capability. Action Item: City will talk to Hansen
about obtaining this easement.
• Stormwater Management
o Collected flow will go to basin located NE of bridge
Mike Stone was OK with the plans to collect and convey stormwater from the bridge to a swale
located on state parkland located northeast of the bridge.
• Contractor's Work Bridge and Access to River
A construction work bridge access road would need to be located temporarily along the eastern edge of the
Park. Mike was OK with the location of this access road,particularly if the area was restored to provide
improved access to the river for the public.
• Contractor's Staging Area
Staging areas were discussed at several locations. To make bridge construction workable, the existing green
space at the Park would likely be used along with the work bridge access road and a portion of the lower
parking lot as one of the staging areas. Another staging area would be needed for storage of materials and
supplies. Craig mentioned that WSDOT will have some surplus land for sale that is north and adjacent to the
park, and that the City would have an opportunity to purchase. It was noted that any staging area, access road,
or additional ground disturbance such as the additional green space area in the Park would need to be
included in the Area of Potential Effect(APE)survey for the project. It was also suggested to leave the location
of the staging area up to the bridge contractor, but in that case, no park land could be granted for the
contractors use if it had not been included in the APE.
Updated March 22,2012
P:\SpokaneValleyCityOf\4288595ullivanBridge\Permitting\Meetings\Agency_Meetings\03-08-12_City_Parks_Mtg\SRWBRCityParks Mtg 1V�tes �3—�0-12.UDCXPag@ 2
CITY PARKS MEETING NOTES
� �������� CLIENT: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
� PROJECT: SULLIVAN ROAD WEST BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
PROJECT NO.: 428859
At first Mike was opposed to using the green space for part of the bridge staging area. When a replacement
area was offered that would enable the public to continue use of the park during construction in the same way
and with the same existing space(project would include an irrigation system and relocation of the park shelter),
and would be constructed prior to bridge construction;he was OK with the idea. In addition the disturbed
ground at the access road, staging area at the existing green space and a portion of the lower parking lot
would be restored to pre-construction conditions so that in the end, the park would have twice the amenities it
has at the present.
• Access to Park during Construction
The public would continue to have access to the Park(including the dance hall and radio car track users)
during bridge construction. A separate access road for the contractor to the proposed staging area located on
the eastern side of the Park was discussed, but there was no conclusion on whether the topography of the land
would be suitable.
• Other
Mike described the problems of the existing water well that serves the Park. It would be highly desirable to
provide a water supply service line across the bridge that the City would maintain. However, even with the City
providing the service line, Consolidated Irrigation Water District may not be interested in the new connection to
its water system. Action Item: City needs to contact Consolidated Irrigation District to determine if they
would allow the Park to be connected to their water system.
• Conclusion: Would a proposal that would replace the existing green area and its amenities so that the new
park area would be the same size and have the same types of public use as is presently available, allow a
de minimis determination?
Marlena thought that under these circumstances, a de minimis determination is likely to be granted. A park
plan that shows the area that will be temporarily displaced and where and how it will be relocated in the Park,
along with restoration of the parkland that will be disturbed, needs to be prepared and presented to both City
and State Parks for approval and signature. If both agencies agree with the plan, which will show that the size
of the park is maintained or improved, and the public use remains the same during and after construction;a
de minimis determination should be possible. Action Item: This approach needs to be explained to State
Parks and agreement obtained.lt also needs to be presented to WSDOT at the upcoming meeting to
verify that a de minimis determination is possible.Also, a Park Plan needs to be prepared showing the
park before and after the proposed improvements.
Updated March 22,2012
P:\SpokaneValleyCityOf\4288595ullivanBridge\Permitting\Meetings\Agency_Meetings\03-08-12_City_Parks_Mtg\SRWBRCityParks Mtg 1V�tes �3—�0-12.UDCXPag@3
STATE PARKS M E ETI NG N OTES
� �������� CLIENT: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
� PROJECT: SULLIVAN ROAD WEST BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
PROJECT NO.: 428859
MEETING DATE&TIME: March 16,2012 2:30 p.m.
Attendees: Craig Aldworth(City) Chris Guidotti(State Parks)
Mike Stone(City Parks) Marlena Guhlke(CH2M HILL)
Jim Dingfield(CH2M HILL)
NOt@S — PROJECT COORDINATION MEETING
ALTERNATIVES
• Describe Alternatives and Rationale for Selection
Because Chris was familiar with the alternatives, Jim Dingfield presented the Alternative 4 and Modified
Alternative 4 because one of these options may be selected for final design.
a. Alternative 1 —Two-Stage Replacement of Bridge
b. Alternative 2-1-Stage Replacement of Bridge with Temporary Bridge
c. Alternative 3-1-Stage Replacement of Bridge with Widening of NB Bridge(widening with piers)
d. Alternative 4-1-Stage Replacement of Bridge with Revisions to NB Bridge
e. Alternative 4(Modified)—1-Stage Replacement of Bridge with Revisions to NB (deck widening only)
ENVIRONMENTAL(SSUES
• ROW will be needed from Sullivan Park
Approximately 30 feet of right-of-way(ROW) will be needed at Sullivan Park(Park).An approximate outline of
the ROW was shown on an aerial map, and based on this location;most of the land would be located on the
steep hillside(which is not used by park users).A retaining wall would be installed to limit intrusion into the
Park. The property would be at its widest point where the bridge ends and the approach to the bridge begins,
and then would taper fairly quickly back to the existing Sullivan Road ROW before reaching the controlled,
lighted intersection.Action Item: The property needed for the bridge project will be identified and
presented to both City and State Parks.
• Bike Ramp Access
o Tie-In Locations
■ There is an existing ramp that connects pedestrians and bicyclists from the southbound(SB)
Sullivan Road Bridge to a Park trail. It was pointed out that a sidewalk along Sullivan Road
north of the bridge isn't necessary, and that the park managers preferred eliminating that
street sidewalk and having the bike/pedestrian trail/sidewalk go through Sullivan Park.
• Multi-Use Path Access
o Tie-In Locations
■ The multi-use path is a 10-foot wide sidewalk that will be constructed on the new SB
replacement bridge. It will be used for both pedestrians and bicyclists. This path will continue
beyond the bridge but based on the above comment, it would go through the park instead of
both the park and along the edge of Sullivan Road.
Updated March 22,2012
P:\SpokaneValleyCityOf\4288595ullivanBridge\Permitting\Meetings\Agency_Meetings\03-16-12_State_Parks_Mtg\State Parks Mtg Notes �3-1 V—IZ.U�CX Page 1
STATE PARKS M E ETI NG N OTES
� �������� CLIENT: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
� PROJECT: SULLIVAN ROAD WEST BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
PROJECT NO.: 428859
• Parking Facilities
There was discussion of parking facilities located in several potential places:
1) Use approximately one half(1/2)of the"lower parking IoY'(the one closest to the river)for a small staging
area for locating the contractor's office, a few parking spaces, and a limited amount of storage.
2)Additional parking would need to be provided elsewhere for the contractor and it would be up to the
contractor to locate additional space.
3)Parking for the public would be maintained during construction because the other%portion of the lower
parking lot would be available and that should be sufficient space based on past park user experience.A count
should be made of the anticipated public parking stalls that would be unavailable during construction.Any
handicap stalls used by the staging area would need to be replaced so that they were available to the public
during construction. There is a Western Dance Hall Salmon BBQ that is held every August that draws a large
crowd of people.Action Item: Count the number of public parking stalls and handicap stalls that would
be used by the staging area.
• Temporary Pedestrian Bridge During Construction
o Temporary vs. Permanent
■ There will be a temporary pedestrian bridge constructed underneath the northbound(NB)
bridge for pedestrians and bicyclists to cross over the river during construction. This bridge
might become a permanent bridge. Action Item: CH2M HILL will determine if there would
be any difference in design and cost for a permanent bridge as compared to a
temporary one.
■ Chris liked the idea of a permanent bridge that would connect the Centennial Trail to the
Park.
o Tie-In Locations
Tie-in locations for the pedestrian bridge were discussed in terms of both north and south sides of the
bridge. During construction, the trail would tie-in to Sullivan Road on the east side of the Sullivan
Road NB Bridge. On the south side, the trail would also tie-in on the eastern side of the Sullivan Road
NB Bridge, and may require an easement or ROW from Hansen to connect the sidewalk at bridge
level down to the pedestrian bridge with a slope providing ADA capability.Action Item: Cify will talk
to Hansen about obtaining this easement.
• Stormwater Management
o Collected flow will go to basin located NE of bridge
Chris Guidotti was OK with the plans to collect and convey stormwater from the bridge to a swale
located on state parkland located northeast of the bridge.
• Contractor's Work Bridge and Access to River
A construction work bridge access road would need to be located temporarily along the eastern edge of
Sullivan Park. Chris was OK with the location of this proposed access road,particularly if the area was restored
to provide improved access to the river for the public. However, he suggested that the river access
improvements might be better located east of the Sullivan Road bridges, instead of west, because the river
forms eddies in that locale, which makes it easier to beach kayaks and canoes.
Updated March 22,2012
P:\SpokaneValleyCityOf\4288595ullivanBridge\Permitting\Meetings\Agency_Meetings\03-16-12_State_Parks_Mtg\State Parks Mtg Notes �3-1 V—IZ.U�CX Page 2
STATE PARKS M E ETI NG N OTES
� �������� CLIENT: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
� PROJECT: SULLIVAN ROAD WEST BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
PROJECT NO.: 428859
• Contractor's Staging Area
Staging areas were discussed at several locations. To make bridge construction workable, the existing green
space at the Park would likely be used along with the work bridge access road and a portion of the lower
parking lot as one of the staging areas.Another staging area would be needed for storage of materials and
supplies. Craig mentioned that WSDOT will have some surplus land for sale that is north and adjacent to the
park, and that the City would have an opportunity to purchase. It was noted that it is unlikely the City would
have funds available nor would the City have adequate time to purchase property that is not essential for the
completed bridge replacement project. It was also suggested to provide only a portion of the contractor's
staging needed and leave it up to the contractor to identify and secure any additional staging area deemed
necessary. It would be up to the bridge contractor to obtain permission from property owners and obtain any
necessary permits for staging areas not provided by the City. No additional park land could be granted for the
contractor's use if it had not been included in the Area of Potential Effect(APE).Also, Chris suggested that
there may be some advantages to having an additional staging area located east of the Sullivan Road bridges
that would be accessed by an existing parking area. There is an existing, but unimproved road that connects
the parking area to the river shore. This staging area might be helpful for the construction of the
bike/pedestrian bridge and could easily be turned into an improved public access area to the river, enabling
kayak users to park above and access the river below. Action Item: Discuss with Steve Worley about
including this eastern staging area in the APE survey.
Chris was OK with the idea to construct a replacement area in the park that would be available to the public
before bridge construction, which would allow use of the park during construction in the same way and with the
same existing space(project would include an irrigation system and relocation of the park shelter). It was
estimated that the proposed park improvements would cost approximately$150,000.The new park shelter
should be bigger than the existing one in Sullivan Park but smaller than the one constructed at Mission Park. In
addition, the disturbed ground at the Sullivan Park access road, staging area at the existing green space and a
portion of the lower parking lot would be restored to pre-construction conditions so that in the end, the park
would have twice the amenities it has at the present.
• Access to Park during Construction
The public would continue to have access to the Park(including the dance hall and radio car track users)
during bridge construction.A separate contractor's access road through Sullivan Park to the proposed staging
area, which would be located on the eastern side of Sullivan Park and blocked-off from public access, was OK
with Chris.
• Other
The existing Avista overhead electrical line west of the SB bridge will need to be moved east or west of the
proposed new bridge construction. Mike and Chris mentioned that when this line is permanently relocated, it
would be preferred to have an underground line in Sullivan Park versus an overhead line. Action Item:
Discuss with Avista about the possibility of the relocated line being underground and supported on
one of the bridges.
The"hard haY'that would be placed over the Centennial Trail that passes through the construction area of the
project needs to include an adequate lighting system to make the trail safe for pedestrian and bicyclisYs use.
Updated March 22,2012
P:\SpokaneValleyCityOf\4288595ullivanBridge\Permitting\Meetings\Agency_Meetings\03-16-12_State_Parks_Mtg\State Parks Mtg Notes �3-1 V—IZ.U�CX Page 3
STATE PARKS M E ETI NG N OTES
� �������� CLIENT: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
� PROJECT: SULLIVAN ROAD WEST BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
PROJECT NO.: 428859
The possibility of dividing the bridge construction work into two contracts was discussed as a means to speed
up the schedule. One contract would be for construction of the park improvements and the bike/pedestrian
bridge and it would be awarded first. The other contract would be for construction of the replacement bridge.
The best and fastest way to secure the ROW property that would be needed from Sullivan Park was discussed.
Easements are faster to obtain from the Parks Commission, but the City will want to own the ROW property
because of the maintenance and upkeep required for the new bridge and approaches to the bridge. Property
acreage needed from Sullivan Park is small. The existing ROW south of the existing bridge is wider and it
needs to be determined if it is at least 33-feet wide, because that would be sufficient to cover ROW needs
without additional property acquisition.Action Item: Measure existing southwestern RO W to see if it is
large enough for the replacement bridge without additional ROW acquisition from State Parks.
• Conclusion: Would a proposal that would replace the existing green area and its amenities so that the new
park area would be the same size and have the same types of public use as is presently available, allow a
de minimis determination?
Chris agreed that under these circumstances, a de minimis determination is likely to be granted from State
Park's perspective.A park plan that shows the area that will be temporarily displaced and where and how it will
be relocated in the Park, along with restoration of the parkland that will be disturbed, needs to be prepared and
presented to both City and State Parks for approval and signature. If both agencies agree with the plan, which
will show that the size of the park is maintained or improved, and the public use remains the same during and
after construction;a de minimis determination should be possible.Action Item:Prepare a park plan showing
before and after for the Park, and explaining why a de minimis determination is appropriate. Obtain
written agreement from both City and State Parks.
Updated March 22,2012
P:\SpokaneValleyCityOf\4288595ullivanBridge\Permitting\Meetings\Agency_Meetings\03-16-12_State_Parks_Mtg\State Parks Mtg Notes �3-1 V—IZ.U�CX Page 4
! MEETING SUMMARY NOTES
� �������L CLIENT: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
� PROJECT: SULLIVAN ROAD WEST BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
PROJECT NO.: 428859
MEETING DATE&TIME: August 29,2012 2:00 p.m.
Invitees: Craig Aldworth(City) Keith Martin/WSDOT
Steve Worley(City) Jim Dingfield(CH2M HILL)
Mike Stone(City Parks) Mark Brower(CH2M HILL)
Chris Guidotti(State Parks) Marlena Guhlke(CH2M HILL)
Lynn Harmon(State Parks)
AGENDA— PROJECT COORDINATION MEETING WITH STATE AND CITY PARKS
A meeting was held at City Hall on August 29, 2012 with representatives from Spokane Valley (City),
Washington State Parks and Recreation Department (State Parks), Spokane Valley City Parks (City Parks),
Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), and CH2M HILL. The purpose of the meeting was
to discuss conceptual changes to the Sullivan Road West Bridge Replacement project; to obtain feedback
from park representatives; and to obtain over-all agreement on the project's current approach to avoid,
minimize and mitigate impacts to Sullivan Park.
The discussion began by describing the changes to the pedestrian bridge's conceptual design. Originally, the
pedestrian bridge was going to be suspended underneath the northbound bridge as a temporary bridge during
construction because the sidewalk on the upper deck was not going to be available for pedestrians and
bicyclists (entire northbound deck needs to be used for vehicle lanes). Because of the relatively high costs of
constructing this temporary bridge, there was consideration given to designing the pedestrian bridge so that it
would be permanent. Then an idea evolved to place the temporary pedestrian bridge during construction on
the eastern edge of the northbound bridge deck and place a permanent pedestrian bridge under the
southbound bridge deck. The advantages of this approach are:
• The temporary pedestrian bridge on the eastern edge of the northbound bridge would cost less than
a suspended pedestrian bridge under the northbound bridge.
• The southbound vehicular bridge deck width could be lessened from 10-feet to 6-feet, which would
reduce costs of the vehicular bridge and would reduce property take at Sullivan Park
• Pedestrian under-bridge walkway would be a more integral part of the bridge design (not look
tacked-on to an old bridge).
• Investment of pedestrian under-bridge walkway would last longer because the northbound bridge
will need to be replaced in approximately 20 years while the new southbound bridge should function
for approximately 50 years.
• Connections to the Centennial Trail and Sullivan Park would be more conveniently located with
shorter pathway connections and improved linkage.
• Pathways on the east side of the Sullivan Road bridges could be eliminated, which would avoid
disturbance on those State Parks' properties (located northeast and southeast of the bridges).
• Placement of pedestrian underneath and on the outside (west side)of the new vehicular bridge as
compared to placing underneath the northbound bridge will provide more head room for those using
Updated October 9,2012
P:\SpokaneValleyCityOf\42SS595ullivanBridge\Permitting\ProjectMgmt\Meetings�P.gency_Meetings\Parks\State_City_Parks_Mt�Summary_�0-27-12 1'Ina1.d�CXPag@ 1
! MEETING SUMMARY NOTES
� �������L CLIENT: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
� PROJECT: SULLIVAN ROAD WEST BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
PROJECT NO.: 428859
the pedestrian bridge, make the pedestrian bridge safer, provide for more natural lighting, and
provide a better view of the Spokane River.
The conceptual plan presented at the meeting showed three walkways on the northwest corner of the new
southbound bridge. Concepts for landscaping adjacent to these walkways and on the retaining wall going
through Sullivan Park were discussed. The walkways included a connection from the pedestrian bridge to
Sullivan Park, a connection from the bridge deck to Sullivan Park (similar to the one that is presently in place),
and a connection from the bridge deck sidewalk to a public sidewalk along Sullivan Road. It was decided that
all three walkways were not needed, and if the pedestrian under-bridge walkway was constructed, the
walkway from the bridge deck to Sullivan Park could be eliminated. This will provide one walkway on top of the
retaining wall along the Sullivan roadway and the other below the retaining wall, which will be "tucked in"close
to the retaining wall to lessen encroachment into the grassy areas of Sullivan Park.
The safety of connecting walkways and the pedestrian bridge were discussed. Trees and shrubs next to
walkways may be avoided because they provide easy places for vagrants or criminals to hide. If trees were
used, an eight-foot wide planting area will be necessary to accommodate the tree roots, and this will cause
more encroachment upon the Park. Pedestrian bridge safety features may include provisions for overhead
lighting and rails that would discourage `jumpers" (rails taller than waist-high). It was noted that not all hazards
can be prevented and that the potential for people to hide on the pedestrian bridge (because the pedestrian
bridge pathway will be partially obscured by the piers), should not deter the construction of the pedestrian
bridge.
Lynn Harmon reviewed the potential State Parks land agreements that might be related to the bridge project:
• Purchase Right-of-Way (ROW)—applies to land acquisition necessary because of the bridge
widening and the placement of the retaining wall. This will require compensation to State Parks for
land at Sullivan Park and at the Centennial Trail.An appraisal may be necessary. This ROW can be
obtained without going to the Parks' Commission and will be led by Ken Graham. Park property
acquired doesn't need replacement elsewhere because the parkland is excluded from Section 6(�
requirements. It is anticipated that a ROW agreement can be obtained in approximately six months.
• Construction/Right of Entry Easements—for temporary use of land during construction. The City will
need to meet Mike Stone's terms and State Parks will agree with Mike's terms. This agreement
should be processed quickly. There will be a State fee of$125.00 that will be waived, but a
processing fee will be assessed.
• Operation and Maintenance Agreements—defines who is responsible for operations and
maintenance. An agreement should be obtained between State Parks, City Parks and City Public
Works that will describe roles and responsibilities for maintenance and operations of the proposed
pedestrian bridge and connecting walkways.
• Perpetual easement—doesn't apply in this case because the land will be either purchased for City
ROW or will remain Parks' property.
• Air space easement—doesn't apply in this case because all the pedestrian and vehicular bridge
structures will be within the City's ROW (no structure will hang over State or City Park's property).
Updated October 9,2012
P:\SpokaneValleyCityOf\42SS595ullivanBridge\Permitting\ProjectMgmt\Meetings�P.gency_Meetings\Parks\State_City_Parks_Mt�Summary_�0-27-12 1'Ina1.d�CXPag@ 2
! MEETING SUMMARY NOTES
� �������L CLIENT: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
� PROJECT: SULLIVAN ROAD WEST BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
PROJECT NO.: 428859
• Transfer of State property to the City—This is a trade of State land for City land, but will be done at
a later date and separate from this project because of the length of time to complete the transfer.
• The bioswale on the Parks northeast parcel from the bridges has already obtained necessary
approvals.
Lynn Harmon said that mitigation for Sullivan Park must be acceptable by Mike Stone. Mitigation, if necessary,
on State parklands located northeast, southwest and southeast of the Sullivan Road bridges must be
acceptable by State Parks.
In regards to the Sullivan Park improvement area to enable the Park to retain the same recreational uses
during construction, Mike Stone said that the primary features will be a picnic shelter and irrigation of a new
grassy area that might require some tree removal (Lynn requested that the giant fir between the upper and
lower parking lots should be preserved if possible).
The Centennial Trail will remain open except for short periods of time during the construction of the overhead
portal and during placement of girders for public safety purposes. A temporary detour for trail users will be put
in place during these times.
Keith Martin asked about the necessity of the pedestrian bridge with the public sidewalk on the southbound
bridge deck because of the additional '/z to 3/4 million dollars to construct it and because it needs to pass
through the Section 4(� process. Marlena pointed out that the pedestrian bridge allows the vehicular bridge
deck to be narrower(reduces width from 10-feet to 6-feet), which results in less take of park property(4-feet
less). However, both State and City Parks said that the additional ROW acquisition wouldn't be a problem
because of the nature and value of the land, and both agencies would support either project approach. Chris
Guidotti, Mike Stone and Lynn Harmon liked the pedestrian bridge idea because it would add to the
recreational experience on the river. Chris thinks that it is great how the project team is trying to accommodate
public use as part of this bridge project. He thinks that the pedestrian bridge underneath would be a safer
choice than on the bridge deck because pedestrians/bicyclists are separated more from the roadway traffic; he
supports it. Mike, Chris, and Lynn thought it was a wonderful idea but wondered if the public would support the
concept because of the costs. Mike thought that the lower pedestrian bridge would be great to have and would
support it. However, Chris, Lynn and Mike would also support the 10-foot pedestrian sidewalk on the new
bridge deck. Their primary needs were to maintain recreational uses at Sullivan Park and on the Centennial
Trail during construction, and provision for an improved public river access point.
The City needs to decide: 1) locate a 10-foot sidewalk on vehicular southbound bridge deck, which would save
costs but require more "take"of parkland or 2), narrow the bridge deck sidewalk to 6-feet and construct a 10-
foot pedestrian bridge that would lessen take of parkland but would add cost to the project. Discussions with
City Council may be appropriate to obtain their input early-on because any change in project approach later-on
could result in a change in bridge design with corresponding additional costs and delay in the schedule. Also,
the public view on the project needs to be considered.
Either approach must obtain Section 4(f) approval through the NEPA evaluation process. Should either
approach obtain necessary environmental approvals; Keith Martin said that they would be federally funded
(i.e., pedestrian bridge could be federally funded if approved under NEPA).
Updated October 9,2012
P:\SpokaneValleyCityOf\42SS595ullivanBridge\Permitting\ProjectMgmt\Meetings�P.gency_Meetings\Parks\State_City_Parks_Mt�Summary_�0-27—12 1'Inal.d�CX Pag@ 3
! MEETING SUMMARY NOTES
� �������L CLIENT: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
� PROJECT: SULLIVAN ROAD WEST BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
PROJECT NO.: 428859
Craig Aldworth provided input on the two alternatives. He had concerns about how aesthetically pleasing the
pedestrian under-bridge walkway would be when river water levels are high because it would result in a
narrow"chute-like"effect for people crossing the river with the vehicular bridge above and the water not far
below. He is also concerned with safety issues because of the proximity of the bridge to the river water during
these times, as well as with traffic noise levels and with on-going maintenance costs. His preference would be
to go with the 10-foot sidewalk on the bridge deck without a separate pedestrian bridge.
It was agreed that additional discussion should take place with Melanie Vance/WSDOT to get her input on the
pedestrian bridge options and how it would fit-in with the Section 4(� approval process (Meeting was
scheduled for 11:00 a.m. on August 30, 2012).
Additional items discussed:
• Public Access to River—it was reaffirmed that public river access will be provided on the western
side of the new southbound bridge. Chris and Mike agreed that this location was preferable because
of the public parking on that side of the Sullivan Road bridges.
• Coffer Dams may be used in addition to the work trestle for bridge construction activities. It won't
affect parkland but was noted as a possible river channel activity.
• Water Supply Line—it was reaffirmed that a water supply line will cross the river on the new
vehicular bridge to provide water to the Park from Consolidated Irrigation District's public water
system.
• Contractor's Staging Area—stays the same as before (in Sullivan Park).
• Access to Park during Construction —stays the same as before with separate construction and
public access to Sullivan Park.
• Public Parking Facilities—stays the same as before (no additional parking spaces need to be
provided during construction because the parking spaces that are currently available are not in full
use).
Action Items:
1. Section 4(fl needs to address both temporary and permanent impacts. The goal is to achieve a de
minimis impact to parklands and to obtain NEPA approval for the chosen pedestrian crossing
approach. A meeting will be held with Keith Martin, Craig Aldworth, Marlena Guhlke and Melanie
Vance to discuss and identify any issues with pursuing the pedestrian bridge concept.
2. Based on meeting outcome, the City needs to finalize the pedestrian crossing approach to present for
Section 4(fl. CH2M HILL's current direction from the City is to proceed with the pedestrian bridge
concept.
3. CH2M HILL needs to redesign pedestrian bridge walkways to eliminate the walkway from the
southbound bridge deck to Sullivan Park.
4. CH2M HILL needs to further define the park improvements plan with Mike Stone and prepare a parks
improvements plan.
Updated October 9,2012
P:\SpokaneValleyCityOf\42SS595ullivanBridge\Permitting\ProjectMgmt\Meetings�P.gency_Meetings\Parks\State_City_Parks_Mt�Summary_�0-27—12 1'Inal.d�CX Pag@ 4
! MEETING SUMMARY NOTES
� �������L CLIENT: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
� PROJECT: SULLIVAN ROAD WEST BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
PROJECT NO.: 428859
5. Agreements need to be achieved with City Parks and State Parks on mitigation for any impacts to
parklands and on ROWs, Construction/Right of Entry Easements, Operations and Maintenance
responsibilities.
Updated October 9,2012
P:\SpokaneValleyCityOf\42SS595ullivanBridge\Permitting\ProjectMgmt\Meetings�P.gency_Meetings\Parks\State_City_Parks_Mt�Summary_�0-27-12 1'Ina1.d�CXPag@ 'rJ
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: November 13, 2012 Department Director Approval: 0
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information QX admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Hotel / Motel (Lodging) Tax - 2013 Grants for Tourism Promotion
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: State Law
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Thus far in 2012 the Council has discussed lodging
tax on three separate occasions:
• An August 28`h Admin Report that provided an overview of the 2013 grant application and
award process. This report included attachments pertaining to Tourism Promotion Area
(TPA) revenues and lodging taxes generated by jurisdiction for the years 2009 through
2011.
• A September 18th Admin Report that followed up on two questions from the Council's August
28th meeting:
o Would expending lodging tax proceeds on "way-finding signs" be an appropriate use?
(Answer was yes, presuming the signs specifically directed visitors to tourist facilities),
and
o Would using lodging tax proceeds to contract with a vendor/agency to develop a festival
for Spokane Valley be an appropriate use of the money? (Answer was "perhaps" but
because this is an unsettled question staff recommended against.)
• A September 25t" Admin Report that discussed setting aside a portion of the lodging tax for
City directed marketing efforts. At the conclusion of the discussion Council by consensus
decided to set aside or earmark $80,000 of 2013 lodging tax proceeds, with $30,000 being
used to offset CenterPlace advertising costs, and $50,000 to be used for yet to be
determined City marketing efforts.
BACKGROUND: In 2003 the City implemented a 2% hotel/motel tax, the proceeds of which are
used to promote conventions and tourist travel to our City. The organizations to which the tax
proceeds are distributed are ultimately determined by the City Council, which receives a
nonbinding recommendation from the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee. The Advisory
Committee is comprised of five members who are appointed by the City Council, and the
Committee membership must include:
• At least two representatives of businesses that are required to collect the tax,
• At least two people who are involved in activities that are authorized to be funded by the tax,
and
• One elected city official who serves as chairperson of the Committee
The Advisory Committee makes its recommendations based upon a combination of written
application materials and a presentation that is made to them by each applicant.
On October 17, 2012, the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee met to consider application
materials and presentations from applicants for a portion of the City's 2% hotel/motel tax
receipts which are estimated to be $460,000 in 2013. Presentations were made by the HUB,
Spokane County Fair & Expo Center, Spokane Regional Sports Commission, Spokane Valley
Heritage Museum, Valleyfest and Visit Spokane.
P:ICIerklAgendaPackets for Weblagendapacket 11-13-1211tem 9 RCA Admin Rprt on LTAC mtg.docx
Following applicant presentations, the Committee discussed both the merits of making particular
awards to various applicants and how they felt revenues should be allocated. Ultimately, the
majority of the Committee recommended that 2013 awards be made in two tiers:
• The first tier being the $380,500 that remained after the City Council's 9/25/2012 earmarking
of$80,000 for City directed purposes, and
• The second tier reflecting the Committee's opinion of how the $80,000 should be expended.
The Committee recommended the following awards be advanced to the City Council for
consideration:
Recommended Awards
Amount Brenda Doug Peggy Lee Jeff
A licant Re uested Grassel Kelle Doerin Cameron Fiman A�,era e
HUB Sports Center 50,000 10,500 20,000 25,000 20,000 30,000 21,100
Spokane County Fair& Expo Center 30,000 14,000 20,000 15,000 20,000 20,000 17,800
Spokane Regional Sports Commission 200,000 150,000 150,000 120,500 165,250 165,250 150,200
Spokane Valley Heritage Museum 12,000 2,000 0 5,000 0 0 1,400
Valleyfest 50,000 6,000 0 20,000 0 0 5,200
Visit Spokane(Spokane Regional CVB) 350,000 198,000 190,500 195,000 175,250 165,250 184,800
692,000 380,500 380,500 380,500 380,500 380,500 380,500
LTAC Suqgested Reallocation of$80.000 Earmarked by City Council on 9/25/2012
-Visit Spokane(staffing of State-line visitor center) 30,000 30,000 0 30,000 30,000 24,000
-De�elopment of mobile application 20,000 20,000 0 20,000 20,000 16,000
-CenterPlace 10,000 10,000 0 10,000 10,000 8,000
-H UB 10,000 10,000 0 10,000 10,000 8,000
-Fair&Expo 10,000 10,000 0 10,000 10,000 8,000
80,000 80,000 0 80,000 80,000 64,000
460,500 460,500 380,500 460,500 460,500 444,500
Noteworthy here is that some organizations partake of both the Outside Agency and Lodging
Tax funding processes. At the conclusion of the 2013 Outside Agency funding process on
September 25, 2012, the Council awarded the following amounts to agencies that have also
applied for lodging tax proceeds:
• $5,429 to the HUB
• $19,368 to Valleyfest
• $1,429 to the Museum
OPTIONS: The recommendations of the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee are advisory in
nature and nonbinding to the Council. The City Council may accept the recommendations in
whole or in part.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: No action is required at this time. This topic will
come back before the City Council on December 11, 2012, when a motion consideration will be
requested.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The 2013 Proposed Budget includes an appropriation of
$460,500 of hotel/motel tax monies from Fund #105 including $30,000 for CenterPlace
advertising, $50,000 for City directed marketing efforts and $380,500 for distribution to
applicants.
P:ICIerklAgendaPackets for Weblagendapacket 11-13-1211tem 9 RCA Admin Rprt on LTAC mtg.docx
STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun
ATTACHMENTS:
• Minutes of October 17, 2012, Lodging Tax Advisory Committee meeting.
• Attachment from the Admin Report presented at the September 25, 2012 Council meeting
which displayed "2013 In-House Tourism Promotion options".
• Fund #105— Hotel/Motel Tax— history of revenues and expenditures—2008 through 2013.
• Tourism Promotion Area (TPA) revenues received by Zone for the years 2009 through 2011.
• Spokane County TPA and hotel/motel tax distributions for the years 2009 through 2011.
• Summary of TPA Fee and 2% Hotel/Motel Tax Collections for the years 2009 through 2011.
• Monthly history of Spokane Valley hotel/motel tax receipts from May 2003 through
September 2012.
P:ICIerklAgendaPackets for Weblagendapacket 11-13-1211tem 9 RCA Admin Rprt on LTAC mtg.docx
1
CITY OF SP(]KANE VALLEY, WA
Lodging Ta�c Advisory Comrnittee
I�inutes of Meeting held October 17, 2012
�013 Award Year
The meefing was called to order at 8:45 am and in attendance was:
• Committee Members Jeff Fiman (by co�ference cal!}, P�ggy Daering, Dou� Kelley, L.ee
Cameron and Committee Chair - Brenda Grassef,
• City Staff comprised of Sarah Farr and Mark Calhoun.
+ Applicant presenters including Phil Champlin (HUB), Q�nise Paufing (Un�imited Mark�fing
for Valleyfest} and Larry Dauis, Stephanie Hugh�s (for Valleyf�st), Jay�e Singleton and
H�rman Meier (Spokane VaEley Heritage Museum), Cheryl Kilday and ,�eanna Hofineist�r
(Spokane Regional CUB —Visit Spokan�), F�ich Hartzell and Erin Gurtef (Spokane Caunty
Fair and Ex�o Center) Eric Sawyer (Spakane Regional Sports Commissian)
Mark Calhaun then addresseci the Cammittee and applicar�ts on a number of issues including:
+ A reminder that beginning in 2007 and runnin� through Jun� 30, 2013 the State Legislature
adde� more permissi�e lan�uage in regards ta how hotellmotel #ax could be used. The
expansion of uses included f�nancing af operations, bu� be�innic�g July 1, 2�13 the tax can
again only �e used for marketing purposes.
� A �rief expfanation related to the financial �nformatian included ir� the Commitkee packet. He
noted khat the 2013 Budget proj�cts $460,500 will be available for �istribution in 20�3, and
thak the City Cou�cil, at their September 25, 2�12 meeti�€� by consensus decided to set
aside $80,OOQ �ar City directed activities with the remaining $380,500 availabPe tf�rough this
grant process. The $8D,000 �armarked by the City will be used for:
o $30,OOD ta parkially offset CenterPlace advertising costs, and
o $5Q,OOQ for City directed marketing to raise Spokane Valley's tour�sm profrle.
• He currently ankicipakes an ending fund balance in Fund #1 Q5— HotellMatel Tax Fund of
$1'68,432 which should be adequate to cover:
� Cash flow resulting from the ane-month delay betwean when the tax is col9ected
by a hotel and when it is remitted to the City.
o T�e uncertainty of what actual revenGes mighk be.
0 7he need for additional maney shoul� ar� unexpec#ed c�ppo�tunity arise during the
year.
The committ�e then diseussed the Councif's decis�on to set money aside. Ms. Grass�l's
reco�lection was t�at City Gauncil members attended a conference in whic'� sign�ge was
broug�t up in discussion, and Council wanted to bring more people aff af the freeway using
signage. She stated she suggeste� postpaning puttir�g thaf money aside until the Lodging Tax
Advisary Committee cauld be informed ar consulted. She thought one councilmember agreed,
but it was decided ta set it aside. Discussion �nsued regardit�g the understan�ing that a mobile
applicatian de�elopment is one possible use af the funds.
The Committee cansens�s was that they felt �he Gity should �ave to apply for and make
presentatians to the Commitkee for hotellmatel kax proceeds including bot� CenterPlace
adverkising and ather rnarketing efforts.
11SV-FS21UserslmcalhounlBudgets120131Lodgrng Tax12092 1017 minutes to LTAC meeting.docx
�
2 �
A�plicant presentations were then made�
� 8:50 HUB Sports Center-P'hiE Champlin
• 9:00 Spvlcane Reqianal Sports Commission - Eric Sawy�r
+ 9:20 Spalcane Valley Heritaqe Museum - Jayne Singletoro and Herman illieier
� 9:40 Visit Spokane - Cheryl Kilday and Jeanna Hofineister
• 10:25 l/alleyf�st - Denise Pauling, Larry Davis, Stephanie Hughes
o Change their request#a $30,000 as they understand they won't receive $50,{}OQ.
• 11:25 Spokane �oun#y Fair and Ex�o Center- Rich Hart��ll and Erin Gurtel
�€�ring a�piicant preser�tations the Commi#tee asked questions and discuss�d variaus points.
One particular poirat Ms, Grassel asked to be included an the r�eetin� minutes is that City of
Spokar�e lodging tax has historically �een allocated with 50% going to Visit Spokane and 50%
goir�g to the S�akane PFU. Beginning this year how�ver the �llocation is as fa�lfows:
• The first $100,OQ0 colfected is granted out, and the balance is allocated:
0 5% - �ports Commission
a 55% -Visit Spokane
o �45°/a - Spokane PFD
Fallow`s�g applicant pr�sentations, delibera#ior�s ensued by �ommit#e� memhers and they
discussed:
* whether CenterPlace should be required to make a presentation
• ihat they feel Valleyfest is a community event that should be funded by the City but not with
lodging tax because the return on investment tv the City c�mes from incr�ased safes #axes
rather than lodging taxes
+ whether they should reallocate the $8{�,00(} set as�de by the City Cour�cil at their September
25, 2012 me�ting.
Ultimately, the majarity of the Cammittee r�comm�nded that 201� awards be made in tw� tiers;
• The first tier �eing the $380,500 that remained after the City Council's 912 512 0 1 2 earmarking
of $80,000 for �ity directed p�rpases, an�
• The s�cond #ier refiectir�g the Committee's opr�nio� of how the $80,flOQ should �e expended.
The Gommitte� r�commended the fol6awing awards be advanced t4 the City Counci! for
cansideration:
ILSV�FS21UserslmcalhountiBudgets42Q13LLodgr`rrg Tax12012 90 17 minutes to LTAC meetrng.docx
�
3
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEI',WA 1 011 71201 2
2093 Lodging Tax Funding Requests and Awards Recommended
by the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC}
Recammended Awarcis
Amount Brenda Doug Peggy Lee Jeff
Applicant Requested Grassel Kelfey Doering Cameron Fiman A�rage
HUB 5ports Center 50,0�0 10,50� 20,000 25,000 20,fl00 30,000 21,10Q
5pokane County Fair 8�Expo Center 30,ODD 14,44� 20,0�0 15,a00 20,000 20,ODa 17,80p
Spokane Regior�al Sparts Commissivn 2Q0,000 150,�00 154,OQ0 120,500 165,250 165,2b0 15p,200
S�pkane Valley Heritage Museum 12,Qp0 2,q0a 0 b,4t3� Q 0 1,40D
Valleyfest 50,000 8,004 Q 20,000 0 0 5,200
Vfsil Spakane(Spakane Regional CVB) 350,000 198,000 190,540 i95,aaa 175,250 165,250 164,800
692,000 3$0,500 380,540 380,50Q 380,540 384,500 3B0,500
LTAC SUggested Reallocation af�SO,OOD Earmarked by Gity Council ora 5125/2d12
-Visit S{�flkane�staFfing of State-line+risitor centerj 34,000 30,000 0 30,0�0 34,000 24,000
-R��elopment of mobile applEcation 20,000 20,000 � 20,004 20,000 16,OOA
-CenterPlace 1Q,000 10,Q00 0 10,000 1d,000 8,000
-H UB 10,000 10,000 0 1 D,000 10,000 $,000
-Fair� Expo 10,000 10,000 0 10,000 10,000 8,004
84,000 BO,ODO 0 �O,OaO 80,0�0 64,000
464,500 460,5Q0 380,500 460,500 4^o0,5p0 444,500
Following khe grant award process Ms. Grassel karought up same ather t�pics that were alluded
ta in applicant presentations that s�e felt should b� brought up to the C9ty Counc3l. These
included the City considering awarding multi-year contracts ar�d k�ak the Revised Cod� of
Washington (RC1N) calls out specifc agencies thak pravide taurism promotion services. She
offered to either bring these topics up with the Cauncil or that the Commitkee can have a round
table discussion.
Ms. Grassel then moved t�at th� Committee pursue loaking at a rnulti-year contract with tourism
ag�ncies ar�d the motian was seconded by Mr. Kelley. Cammittee discussion ensued an� the
mot�an was withdrawn by Ms. Grassel. N[r, Camerar� cammented thak he is concerned with a
mulki-year contract and wondered hQw this wau�d be done. He stated that he doesn't want ko
caose the process to other appficanks and suggested perhaps taking a portion of funds that are
relatively secure. He stated he would be ca�tious to put the Committee in a �osition where they
don't fulfil! th� spirit of t�e legislatian. Discus�ian amorag the Committee and C�eryl Kilday and
Eric Sawyer �nsued.
Ms. Grassel withdrew her initial motion and then in a new moiion moved tha� the Camrnittee
wauld li�Ce to have Visit Spokane and the Sports Comm�ss�on meet with ti�e City Ma�ager and
Mayar ka discuss longer term eontracts. Mr. Cameran seconaled the motion and suggested
getting a legal apinion as to whether this was possible, He further sta�ed that the difficult part
politically is t�ak you have a lot of e�tities that came to table and that Cauncil doesn"t want to tell I
t�err� no, and so the Committee s�ould consider �tavin� a �aseiine approach that ke�ps politics
out and loaks at it as return on investment otherwise we wvn't have tax dollars. He also
1lSV-FS21Userslrr2calhounlBudgets120131Lodging Tax12012 10 97 minutes[a LTAC mee#ing.docx
4
suggested the Ciky provide $50,OQ0 of ect�nomic developrr�ent funds for Valleyfesk. After further
discussion the motion was brought to a vate with all in favor.
Ms. Kilday from Visit Spokane then addressed the Committe� and noted tf�at the City of
Spokane recentiy increased their {odging tax rate by 1.T3°/o. She stated they would like the City
of Spolcane Ualley Cour�cil to also consider increasing their tax as well to equalize the tax in the
communi�ies and provide additianal fundin�. fVlr. Cameron stated that hoteliers don't support at�
increase in the tax�ust to generate mvre money. He feft the City of Spokane Va�ley should
guard any additional tax proceeds unkil the S�orts Commission compl�tes a fac�liti�s study.
The Committee vuoufd Iike ta come bac� an� discuss t�e topic of increasing the ladging tax rate
ir� the future.
Meeting was a�journed at approximately 1.30pm.
11SV-FS24UsersUncalhounlB�rdgets420131Lodging Tax12012 1f1 97 minutes to LTAC meeting.dacx
ATTACHMENT A
20'I3 In-Hous�Tourism Promotlon qptions
Descripfiion Non-recurri� Recurring
varies widely de�ending on complexity and whether
De�elopment of smartphone Spokane Valley Tourism app $20,�p0.00 cansultant or in-house development
Smartphone to�rism app annuai fees $5,Q(}p.00 ongoing annual hosting & maintenance
Reprint updated copies of Spakane Valley Passport" $4,20b.00 estimated supply for 1 year; repTint as needed
Mail distribution of passport to targeted VICs*'� $150.0� new mai[ings as rz��ded
Develop and print Spokane Valley bicycfelattraction� map* $1,850.00 estimated supply for 1 year; reprint as needed
Mai1 distribution of�ikelaitractions map to targeted VICs�'` $150_00 new maiEings as needed
Fu�! page ad in Tourism Allianee WA State Tourism Guide $'14,OOQ.00
Fu[f page ad in Visit Spokane REgional Visitars guide $3,700.OQ
Visit Spokane website banner ad (12 months - 118 share) $3,600.00
Page sponsarship - A3aces ta stay- (� summer months - 1f2 share) $1,500,00
Total if al1 pro�osal implemented $49,150.00 $5,0{�0.0�
Note: About$6�4,035.70 in 2fl12 economic develo�ment funding is being spent far a marketir�g consultantlad agency ta develop
short and It�ng term strategies for m�rketing and promoting Spokar�e Valley for ecanornic develapment anc! tourism, and will include
some minima] advertising development and placement prior to the end of 2D12. Funds ha�e not been allocated in ti�e 2013 budget
#or implementation of the recommendatians.
"Th�se are pravid�d ta loca! hotels, the Visit Spokane V�Cs in downtown SpokanE and at the airport, also
*Targeted VICs are Visitor [nformation Centers 3ocated within abouti a day's dri�e of Spokane Valley, and from which we draw the
largest percenfiage of our overnight visitors to this area
1`SV-�S2�Users\mcalhoun\Budgets1,2013\1{l5 Reu and exp
CITY OF SPOKANE VALL�Y,WA 10111120'12
Fund#�05-Hotel 1 Motel Tax Fund
Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance
- Actual for 2008 througi� 20�1
- 2Q12 and 2013 Budgets
2012 6udget
Actual As Adopted As Amended 2Q13
• 2008 2009 2010 2011 1�11512�T 1 10130/2Q12 Budget
Re�enues
HotellMotel Tax 467,089 423,978 448,544 457,�a3 430,Ofl0 430,000 460,0(}0
In�vestm�nt]nterest 10,280 i,892 1,018 454 7�0 70fl 5CrQ
Subtotal revenues 477,369 425,870 449,562 A58,057 4�3�,70d 430,700 460,500
Ex�enditures
R Er�tertundTransfers-#�009 CenterPlace 84,55d 86,963 37,50(} 0 30,400 3Q,OQQ 34,O�a
City directed marketing efforts fl � 0 Q 0 0 5Q,OQD
Tc�urism Promotion 525,a21 375,2d2 �62,3172 472,48'i 4(}D,70fl 540,200 380,5fld
Subtotal expenditures 609,571 462,1�6� 399,802 472,481 430,700 , 574,200 4fiQ,5fJa
Re�enues over(ur�der) expendi#ures (132,202} {36,295) 49,760 (�[4,424) 0 {'{39,500) d
Beginning fund balance 39'[,U93 258,891 222,595 272,356 257,932 257,932 �9'[8,432
Ending fund balance 258,891 �22,�96 272,356 257,932 . 257,932 ; 1� 18,432 � �� 18,432
�
Y
2012 Awards �
Recipient Round 1 Round 2 �' Total
HUB 42,600 0 42,600
Sports Commission 185,000 0 185,000
Museum 3,900 1,'[0(} 5,000
CenterPlace 30,000 0 30,000
ValCeyfest 0 30,p00 30,000
CVB 0 251,720 251,720
Fair& Expa 0 25,90� 25,900
Total appropriation 261,500 308,720 570,220
2012 Q$ 28 RCA
��sv-�sz�users�mcalr,ounl�udgets1zo13�1a5 Rev and exp
CITY QF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 812 012 0 1 2
Analysis of Spokan� County Tourisrr� Pramotion Area (TPA} Rev�enues
Collected in Zones A, B, G and D**
For the years 2009 through 2fl11
2009 2�10 2019 Total
Gity of Spokane ValleV
zo�,e A o.oa a.oa o.oa o.ao
Zone B 356,854,OQ 493,270.00 473,168.OQ �,323,292.00
zon� c o.ao a.oa o.00 o.00
Zone D gss.ao �,o77.oa �,�s�.�o g,�s�.�o
357,842.00 �Q0,�47.Q0 474,334.50 1,332,523.50
Citv of Spolcane
Zone A �,005,174.OQ '{,095,426.04 1,114,7oo.oa 3,215,sao.ao
Zone B 261,561.50 335,732.00 362,142,00 959,435.50
Zone C �.00 0.00 0.00 0.{30
Zone D 4,355.50 6,308.00 2,750.50 13,4�4.00
1,271,091.00 1,437,466.00 1,479,592.54 4,188,149.50
Spakane CaunkX �
Zone A 0.00 O.C1� 0.00 O.OD
Zone B 0.00 Q.00 0.00 �.{��
Zone C 348,382.00 364,246.0{l 36'�,754.00 1,074,382.Op
Zone D �,652.fl0 1,196.50 Q.00 2,768.5Q
350,034.00 365,362.50 36�,754.00 1,OT7,150.50
�ota9s
Zone A 1,Q05,174.00 1,095,426.00 1,114,700.�fl 3,215,300.{}0
Zone B �18,415.50 $29,002.00 835,310.00 2,282,727.50
Zor�e G 34$,382.00 364,246.00 361,75�.Q0 1,074,382.00
Zone � 6,995.50 14,501,50 3,917.00 25,�414.OD
9,978,967.00 �,303,175.50 2,315,681.04 6,597,823.50
I
Zor►e A
hotels located in downtown Spokane wlth lodging revenues > $50{�,000.
Zone B
Hotels Eocated in the cities of Spokane Valley and 5polcane that are not located in
downtawn Spokane wi�h lodging revenues � $500,000.
Zone C
Hotels located i�n unincorporated Spokar�e County #t�a# are not Zone A or B, and
F�ave fodging revenues � $5Q0,000,
Zone D
Hotels ioca�ed anywhere in the S�okane Caunty TPA with revenues < �5{}O,fl00
*�Per fhe Washrngfc�n Stafe Department of Revenc�e
TPA rev
�r5V-F52rUsersl,mcalhoun�Sudgets'�2013�105 Rev and exp
SPQ�►N� COUNTY DISTRIBUTIONS** 9/1112012
DistribWtions for the years 2009 thtrough 2a11
S okaroe C�unt Tourism Prom4tiar� Area TPA Dis#ributions
2009 20�4 2091 Total
CVB - Visit Spokane 1,300,000 1,664,187 1,657,500 4,621,687
Spokane Regional Sports ComrrEission 325,OOQ 467,257 460,001 1,252,258
United States Figure Skating �25,OOQ 72,500 4 197,500
1,750,Oi70 2,203,944 2,117,5�1 6,071,445
S akane Caunt Distribut�ons of Hotel I Matel Tax
2009 2Q10 2011 Total
CVB -Visit Spokane 275,fl00 275,00� 275,�Q0 82�,000
Spokar�e Regiona� Sparts Camm�ssion 75,OQ0 75,000 66,Oa0 2�6,fl00
35C1,Of70 3�0,000 341,000 'f,041,00�
'`"'Per the Spokane County Budget Ofiice
Spok Cnty dist
��SV-FS2�Users�mcalhoun\Budgets�2Q13`�1(}5 Reu and exp
CITY OF SP�KANE VALLEY, WA 812312Q12
Se�mmary of TPA Fee and HotellNlatel 7ax Callected
For the years 2009 through 2011
2U09 2010 2011 Total
Citv af Spokane Vallev
TPA ^ 357,842 500,347 474,335 1,332,524 1
Hotel 1 Matel Tax 423,978 448,544 457,603 1,330,125 2
781,820 948,89� J3�,938 2,662,649
City of Spokane
7PA `f,279,091 1,437,46fi 1,479,593 4,18$,'i 50 1
Hotel 1 Motel Tax 1,361,444 1,415,863 �,37'f,827 4,149,`i34 3
2,632,535 2,853,329 �,851,420 8,337,284
Spokane Countu
TPA 350,03� 365,363 361,754 1,077,�51 1
Hotel 1 Motel Tax 381,730 395,489 397,030 1,174,2�9 �#
731,764 760,852 75$,784 2,251,400
9 -From Deparfinent of Revenue I
2-From City of Spokar�e Valley
3-From City of Spokane CAFR-Fund#1590
9-Frorn 5pokane Gounty CAFR-Fund#126
CoSV TPA and 2%
IISV-FS21UserslrncalhounlTax RevenuelLodging Tax120121105 hotel rt�otel fax
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 11I1120i2
HoteUMotel Tax Receipts through- Septem6e
Actual for the years 2003 through 2012
�.� 2a�z to zo�T
DifFerence
2003 2004 2005 2006 2D07 2008 2009 2�10 2011 2Q12 $ %
January 4.00 16,393.58 20,691.Q3 20,653.49 25,137.92 28,94&.9fi 23,28d.21 22,706.96 22,212.21 21,442.32 {77D) (3.47°fo)
Febn.�ary O.t10 18,161.04 19,976.81 20,946.09 25,314.66 24,623.D6 23,283.95 23,416.94 22,792.14 21,548.82 (1,243) (5.46%)
March OA� 1&,182.01 22,828.15 24,308.48 29,194.35 27,5Q9.99 25,272.d2 24,232.35 24,611.28 25,E54.64 1,043 4.24%
April 0.00 26,&97.82 29,748.41 34,371.82 37,g54.53 4{3,406.fl2 36,253.63 39,463.49 38,230.49 52,13d.37 13,90U 36.36%
May 19,527.32 16,440.37 29,017.66 32,522.06 31,371.01 36,828.53 32,588.SD 34,683.32 33,790.69 37,478.44 3,688 id.91%
June 32,512.11 53,284.01 35,330.35 34,256.71 36,267.47 46,659.88 40,414.59 39,935.36 41,403�41 43,970.7U 2,567 6.24°Jo
July 38,580.48 42,120.26 43,841.82 49,7d4.62 55,281.99 50,�421.37 43,950.2fi 47,385.18 49,311.97 52,818.fi4 3,5Q7 7.11%
August 54,974.74 43,649.84 46,852.10 45,916,16 51,12fl.70 50,818.35 50,146.5fi 54,922.J9 57,451.68 57,229.23 (222) (0.35%)
September 30,718.23 39,390.66 d6,746.18 50,126.53 57,260.34 64,711.89 50,817.62 59,418.95 58,908.16 64,298.70 5,391 9.15%
Collected to date 168,312.$8 275,119.59 295,032.51 312,845.96 343,830.5� 366,9�6.05 326,007.64 346,165.55 348,712,Q3 37fi,571.82 27,860 7.99%
dc�ober 36,960.11 33,004.62 34,966.$5 38,874.17 43,969.74 38,294A6 36,784.3fi 41,272.35 39,02$.O8 4.Q4
No�ember 23,044.56 32,176.61 26,�89_36 36,417.11 36,°�[0.64 35,582.59 34,�54.79 34,329_78 37,339.36 U.QO
f�ecember 28,825.30 23,142.70 31,740.18 29,147.15 31,377.41 26,294.19 27,131.43 2&,77fi.84 32,523.�9 Q.44
Total Cotlec#ions 257,142.85 363,443.52 387,828.90 417,084,39 461,578.36 467,489.21 423,978.22 448,544.52 457,602.66 376,571.82
Budget EsFimate 419,DOD.00 3&0,000.00 436,827.00 350,000.00 400,000.00 400,000.00 512,0OO.Oa 380,Od0.ad 480,OOOAO 430,oao.aa
Actual over(under)budg (161,857.15) (16,556.48) (48,998.10) 67,084.39 61,578.36 67,089.21 (88,d21.78) 88,544.52 (22,397.34) (53,428.18)
Total aetual collections
as a%of tatal budget 61.37°/a 95.64°/a 8$.7$% 119.17% 115.39°'/0 116.77% 82.81% 11$.D4% 95.33% nla
%change in annual
lotal col]eeted n!a 41.34% 6.71% 7.54% 10.67% 1.19% (9.23%) 5.79°/a 2.02°!o nla
%of budget collected
through September 40.17°/a 72.40°/4 67.54°Jo 89.38% 87.47%0 91.73% 63.67% 91.10°fo 72.65% 87.57%
%of actaai total collected
through September 65.46%0 75.74°Jo T6.07% 75.01°/s 75.80% 7$.56°10 7�.89% 77.18% 76.20% n/a
Chart Reflec6ng Histnry af Collections through the Month af Sepfember
40Q,000.00
350,000.00 —
Septernber
3QQ,OOfl.00 —
August
250,000.00 -�-- � July
-Sune
200,0OO.OD , —
c May
350.0OO.�d - - `:!'� — ■April
,i_ " �.�r, �}--�* --- c.� =March
ioo,oaa.00 -I,— ;
' � ■February
SO,OOQ.00 � � - ■January
o.00 - � '� � { � � ■ � � �
2003 2004 2Dp5 2�06 �(707 2008 2009 ZO10 2011 201Z
Page 21
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: November 13, 2012 Department Director Approval ❑
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information � admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Extinguishment of Drainage Easements: Beach House Apartments, 16621 E
Indiana Avenue; and Spokane Valley Cancer Center, 13424 E Mission Avenue
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None
BACKGROUND: In 2011, a drainage easement was granted to Spokane Valley as part of the Indiana
Avenue Extension Project, #0112 (See Attachment 1). The road project was completed and a portion of
the storm water runoff was discharged into a bio-in�ltration swale, located within the easement area, for
treatment and disposal. In 2012, a local developer purchased the property and proposed an apartment
complex (Beach House Apartments) on the parcel. The developer requested to relocate the e�sting swale
at his expense to better facilitate the proposed project. Detailed plans were submitted, reviewed, and
approved by Development Engineering and Public Works to confirm that the proposed swale provides
adequate capacity for treatment and disposal of the contributing runoff generated by the Indiana Avenue
Extension Project.
The current property owner has requested that the City extinguish the e�sting easement and accept the
dedication of a new drainage easement for the relocated bio-in�ltration swale.
Also, in 1992 the subject drainage easement on Mission Avenue was granted to Spokane County which
became the City's easement at incorporation. Up until this year the parcel was a vacant lot. The
Developer of the project on this lot would like to reconfigure the easement so the new easement and the
pond contained within the easement can be shaped to integrate into the site design. The new pond will
fulfill the purposes for which the initial drainage easement was created. To reconfigure the easement, the
current easement needs to be extinguished and a new easement granted to the City. The latter easement is
in process.
OPTIONS: Consensus to place a Resolution Extinguishing Stormwater Easement at 16621 East Indiana
Avenue, and a Resolution Extinguishing Stormwater Easement at 13424 E Mission Avenue, on a future
Council Agenda for approval consideration; or take other appropriate action.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consensus to place a Resolution Extinguishing Stormwater
Easement at 16621 East Indiana Avenue, and a Resolution Extinguishing Stormwater Easement at 13424
E Mission Avenue, on a future Council Agenda for approval consideration.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: NA
STAFF CONTACT: Gabe Gallinger, Development Engineering Senior Engineer
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Map of area that includes easement.
2. Copy of recorded drainage easement s
3. Draft Resolution Extinguishing Stormwater Easement at 16621 East Indiana Avenue.
4. Draft Resolution Extinguishing Stormwater Easement at 13424 E Mission Avenue
i:r-v i.:,�,;,,;_...�.. :' b..�.. .
r�,« ��. Department of Community Development _ �:
S'pakane ._ , . . _ _ :
, `�
��'��1��� : . Planning Division �
_ y" �'°`, R�_ _ .
Re uest to Extin uish
q g
Draina e Easements at
g
16621 E. Indiana Avenue and
13424 E. Mission Avenue
City Council Study Session
November 6, 2012
Gabe Gallinger, Development Engineering Senior Engineer
i:r-v i.:,�,;,,;_...�.. :' b..�.. .
r�,« ��. Department of Community Development _ �:
S'pakane ._ , . . _ _ :
, `�
��'��1��� : . Planning Division �
_ y" �'°`, R�_ _ .
��� '�662'f E. Indiana
�t� 1' } . �, ���"'7¢�°,�� -° �e, - . -,•—`�
�� r� '� �" �.•� 1' �-. 45171:�I.;; , ��.••�451P�ii77ff4
� 25!?'S.9157 � � '� � � �i� 5:5174.413i3 ���
._ . � , a .. f ,
'� -1S ��'� a �'c
-� , � �,e C; . .
, � 1 •.1 �l - ' ��R
��lor�p�t^�' � �. 4/ � / �� �� +i ,'�k r i Mis3i�n�Pk _ _ _
,.� 'w _i„,,/��,� �i .� ��,� f.� Ulcifli�.i3=i.5�+ r _..
��. ��*�'�-+� r ,'S,r� _, �J �� ...�-_ ....s .� '='h' ti -
.� �3 /�. � `�'�`'�' ,`'�� t "�
:]�la 7i� ,� f �a '�`,� '-���•, �
�,� �• ����"L�5�` "��.y�'� .'�` :�'.! `� , .
���'s '�? '�'s� �. ��,'��� ��
4� ���" ;�.�t, r y� •c'�
„�t �A' ,s::��.�:ii: a
��-f�,�`� ":z�`�� ` �,�A, + �' ���;��,�.�''� �= xisxing Draknan_.,� ,�, -
A�,-+l.►f ,���.�: � �� � ���se�nent 4 r - .
�.',�a�s�` �*�� � ���.� �i �' � �"
-F.� ,�itii �i t . � ^ , _ - �-
. w ,;r�,�1�� ���. •;�-��%'� µ ���"��' �151516117��
.Y
� _ �. .��:. � �' ,�' ^ �. ^�.. . ;
4 q�/� ,•.� r�'.�����,,,�yj"y��r.." a i� �.� -.r ��'� �' a. ,
�� y If
� � �'e
, [�J 19� ��y� �i, ��r t' •w` �,�: S P Q fC�A hJ� �.a1 L L�Y
�yr
'+� '� �!�.�f ��, ,���' '�" ��°�,-�`�'r �, �� � i.�npd! � _ . : . _i�,,:s i i�:��
,*�'J-,4� �!' �,,• n. ';t�f �+f 7 t s ff (� F� r_ 1�y.'��L I_ EY: ., � -�
�i z"���� a.' E ' �e,Y�"�"'� y� y
i ',r. "` �' �y�� ,�'�MP` 9fl�'� � a �=.i.:��n= ,�,.
�''-;�"" + �'� ' '�t ��� 6 _ "�r
�'- •.� I / ��__-:_��.... -b �
��l M+yil. �. �351�t�1'_7.- r==` -- - � y,_,
__�.. } � .` . . . . -. .. _. -
-14tt_.._ .- __ ____ � � ... .-��`��..�� . .
�-fi ; .! , t� 1i131�d31 � �i13t C�1('�i
t
�i 7 13'_;.�31�4 .`� � '—"''� At_ .
11 T� n.a a tl� ',; - _ _ ,�� ,. r _•
• � � -. .� �� � N�.. =i 5131.05L 1 -. _� '�''�+f,•
-a.L`` �r�-1�---r--- ._ � ��icS�c�tiL @ ���' "°"- - ai..,
�i�'. r.� _' "4� ,.. .`° ,'ks 4 ..
ast3i.n5zrs r, �, �_
- '� ' N -� ��`' _
.
-_- � � � rS?31.USt`3 � �..N �1.-k'.��. -.
— � �'� � ~R�� '�� 4513:.t7571t � -
� . _.- .r; �-.
'� ' �R. f:.. - ,SS33!�S�}7 c =. , -c;� �ys � 7
, . �- ,45I33.:1:i2t3� .� . � . .�y �' �h 4}�N7e�� - -�'( :- ..
°+: �,�; iS131.::511 . �� . l�ii4;.�r� . " �• _ -.�
!513�0�1R 1;13f.��if`�� .� �.1 .. � n -��'� -i5131.DL1�
.. r�.� . �k .�51� .����.� ,.
�
`1 '� -'v ����":_+�'
a95.3 0 247.54 495.3 Fee[ �
rnis mnp is s user gene�sted siahr•ou�pullmm an Inlernef mappirg stle and is for relerenee only �alx layers Ihal uppenr Qn lhis m�p may ar may nol 6e accurnle,currenl,ur olhervnse
relia6la.
2
i:r-v i.:,�,;,,;_...�.. :' b..�.. .
r�,« ��. Department of Community Development _ �:
S'pakane ._ , . . _ _ :
, `�
��'��1��� : . Planning Division �
_ y" �'°`, R�_ _ .
Beach House Apartment Complex
New Drainage Easement: ST��aRA,NPER r3.
THE BEACH HOUSE Rt FA 80RDER
TftNLHEA6 CkA6MC PLANS -�E,yr
���
��j.'Ilil I Cf �i l L �r ;, � �,� .\� , f� _} a�(�� �9/r','
!
� 4:� 4111�F i�),hf is v.- d� � / -� �--���/111,�,g{�f
�, � N�w 5torm Qrainag- r �f"A'"
•Relocated approximately � _"� - 1 ;1; , Ea�eme�t � ��4 -��;�T,
� ��.� �5,� ���._.<L� ,a� �
is � �/ `,� ^ � � �/ /o/!
250 feet west �—._ � �=. �:� ��, �_� � �,�s �� �
� t5 _�-� „ �� I
\ ! 41-�� \ �,-`� �;�� 'lT5 f
� �i �� � � o- , \
. � ���� �
«''r� �-� �`� � � ` �� Cs4 '�� _
� � �- ��,+�`� � uo '*', �� � �;� ��>�, �L y
• �r .f L� t f l .. � ,� � .� �n'
Provides adequate capacity � ��P�
�1 �a , ,. � � �: �. ,. f_
b��l Q,`�C' ' �i � �i��� �arQl/:
for public and private runoff ' � � :��� ;;� ���� �- ;�;=%
�`' ��Y' /.j-�.- '�.f/,-'f%i
` J! y ,p�` ,l
x
� `
�a -
� '�%`� C',p��� ���� �i.��4RRINACE EASEMENT
,, -- GRANTE6 70 pfY OF
�l`
�� � �� I'�f�� ���/7/�� ��� �%r�� SPOIipN€VALLEY.
v' � f.s�P�'_ rf
��/". � f-��� � 'i„ - -- — -
�y- e �`j�
rY� ` ."'_'_ . ..I
I.INE T.Ai3'LE l V h' r 7i f i;IW i 1=;? �
LInE biSTAWCE 9EARirrC LINE �iSiANCE BEARINC �
L1 56A7' S81'24'3§"W L9 SBAQ' N4�19'11�E ����1 �� ;�?'r'1 j
L2 57.33 526'SB'14"W 110 59 72' N75'13 Ft€ ,,- � _ _ �
L7 IaL47 �51628'25'W UI B5.27 582'4953 E �� � —.
L4 89.43 '.N92"49'53"w� L17 98,�2' .k76'282J E �.'�'7iri - - - ..
LS 47.17� NaB'Jf22"w 113 5415' S14'412BE L���F T T T r�i�_*�.._--
Lfi 121.06' S7&l9'11'w ll4 4390' N:4'41'29"W r 1 1 1 3 t�1 1 �--'
Li 9G.OU' SIJ'40'49 E L15 52,32� N?6'S8'Fd'E ,
L8 42.W' N8774�11"E Lt5 3{.55' N81'24'JS�E scatE i'.e0' I
J.R.BONNETT ENGINEERING Tt��s�ACxxotisEnrr�,aa[L�n
BRAINAG�kASE14ENT
,.
CrnL 1�u6 57RUC7uRAL CONSULnNG ANO ofs�CN APFEGTSFARCELN0.4i13k.9112&451i�1''OltS_�` 1=f_�
ea4csia��� axrss�oea:i�-iav.io CSVL1cvc!n;u���Fnt.i�gEilceritly
�cxui[,xAS�ixcrav ssms I
(yyl sy-�yay/r�y�uyl�-��� DA'fL':MARCH 22,201?.
. I f, ��2
�roi�oc� ����-1�=�j �
ia�»,�.�ss�.x� 1 �u�v
Suhmltl:iJ!b.__._ �
DRAFT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. 12-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY
WASHINGTON, EXTINGUISHING DRAINAGE EASEMENT AT 13424 EAST
MISSION AVENUE, SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON; AND OTHER MATTERS
RELATING THERETO.
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley, Washington is the successor in interest to a stormwater
drainage easement that was granted to Spokane County prior to the City's incorporation, which burdens
property owned by AC Investments, LLC; and
WHEREAS, the easement in question is located on Spokane County Assessor's parcel number
45151.9031, at 13424 East Mission Avenue. The easement was recorded on August 31, 1992, Spokane
County Auditor's recording number 9208310257; and
WHEREAS, the easement was granted on a vacant parcel to accommodate stormwater runoff for
a portion of Blake Road, but the development plan for the property requires that the stormwater swale be
relocated; and
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley approved a grading and drainage plan for the Spokane
Valley Cancer Center and it was determined that the relocated stormwater swale provided the required
treatment and disposal capacity to replace the e�sting facility; and
WHEREAS, City staff analyzed the request in terms of future need for stormwater treatment and
disposal facilities and determined that the easement is not necessary at its current location, for public
health, safety or welfare.
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane
County, Washington, as follows:
Section 1. Relinquishment of Easement Burdenin� Snokane Countv Assessor's narcel
number 45151.9031. The City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, as the successor in interest,
hereby relinquishes the easement granted for stormwater treatment and disposal purposes, Spokane
County Auditor's recording number 9208310257.
Section 2. Authorization for Citv Mana�er to Execute Easement Extin�uishment
Document. The City Council of the City of Spokane Valley authorizes the City Manager to execute the
Easement Relinquishment, attached as Exhibit A to this Resolution, and all other documents necessary
thereto.
Section 3. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect upon adoption.
Adopted this day of November, 2012.
ATTEST: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Thomas E. Towey, Mayor
Approved as to Form:
Office of the City Attorney
Resolution 12-_Relinquishment of Easement—Spokane Valley Cancer Center Page 1 of 2
AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO:
City of Spokane Valley
City Clerk
11707 E. Sprague Avenue, Suite 106
Spokane Valley,WA 99206
REFERENCE#:
GRANTOR: Gregory D. and Kimberly R.Jeffreys
GRANTEE: Governinent, City of Spokane Valley
SHORT LEGAL:
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY BSP 04-08 -MISSION MEDICAL CENTER PARCEL"2"AUDITORS
#5749346 BK 3 PG 13& 14 BEING A PTN OF NEl/4
ASSESSOR'S PROPERTY TAX PARCEL:45151.9031
RELEASE OF EASEMENT
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the City of Spokane Valley is the owner of an
easement acquired from Gregory D. and Kimberly R.Jeffreys(Grantor)dated August 28, 1992 and recorded
under Auditor's File No.9208310257,records of Spokane County,Washington,over the real property described
therein as follows:
See attached copy of recorded drainage easement for legal description of drainage easement
The City of Spokane Valley does hereby abandon and release all rights acquired under said easement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,said corporation has caused this instrument to be executed this day
of ,20
BY:
Mike Jackson, City Manager
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
)
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
On this day of , 20 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary
Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared MIKE
JACKSON,to ine know to be the person who signed as City Manager of the municipal corporation that executed
the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrwnent to be his/her free and voluntary act and
deed and the free and voluntary act and deed of the City of Spokane Valley for the uses and purposes therein
mentioned; and on oath stated that she/he authorized to execute the said instruction on behalf of said City of
Spokane Valley.
IN WITNESS WHERE OF I have hereunto set iny hand and official seal the day and year first above
written.
(Signature of Notary)
(Print or stamp name of Notary)
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington,
residing at:
(City)
My Appointment E�ires:
9�083g025�
�
�
Aeseseore Parcel No. 45l51.9018
SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Spokane County� Washington �D1. ��� r,,
�ruGr '7� !
bRAINAGE EASEMENT
The Grantore Gregory D. and Kimberly R. Jeffreys, Hueband and Wife of the County of
Spokane, state of waehinqton, for and in coneideration of Mutual Benefite, the
receipt of which ie hereby acknowledged, grante to Spokane County, a political
subdivieion of the State of Waehington, an Easement over, under, upon and acrose
the hereinafter described lande eituated in the County of Spokane, State of
Waehington:
Begin at the northeast corner of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of
section 15, T. 25 N. , R. 44 E.W.M. in spokane County, Washington;
zhence S 00°06`40"E al.ong the east line of saici NW 1/4 a distance
ot' 198 feet, thence S 89�53'20"W a distance of 30 feet to the
True P.O.B. ; thence continue S 89°53'20"W a distance of 40 ieet,
zhence N 00`06'�!0"W a distance of 50 feet, thence N 89°53'20"E
a distance of 40• feet, thence S 00°06'40"E a distance of 50 feet
to the True P.O.B.
The Easement granted to Spokane County and ite authorized agenta ie for the sole
purposes of allowing natural drainage and/or runoff over and acrosa the above
deacribed lande. The Grantor(a) hereby agree not to obatruct, artificially collect
or diecharge the flow acrose or adjacen�, to the above deecribed lande. The
Grantor(s) agree thatt' Spokane �County, accepte, no responeibility for maintaining the
drainage Eaeement. The Grantor(s):saccept,r`coatpl�te and total reaponeibility for the
conetruction and perpetualt�maint�e"nanCe' of �he facilitiee located within thia
drainage Eaeement per p,.laine�on`�fi'le'�tnt`�t h'�`bffice of the Spokane County Engineer.
�9�l. �,�tw,4C
+ e ►.�- . ... . r . . . � .
The Grantor(s) heXeby releaeee Spokane County, and al�. ite officere, employeea, and
agente from any responeibility or liability for any damage whatsoever including
ir.verae condemnation by or to any and all peraone or pYOperty ariaing out of or in
any way incident to or attributable to the etorm drainege within said Eaeement.
Spokane -County ie hereby granted the right to ingreae and egrese to, over and from
the above deecribed property.
Whenever the Cedar Chateau Eatatee "H" or their euccessora in intereat fail to
maintain the drainage facilities in confprmance with the approved Drainage Plan, a
notice will be given to the same as above or their eucceseore in intereet by the
County. If not corrected after ten (10) daye, �he County has the right to correct
the maintenance failure or have it corrected at the expenee of the Cedar Chateau
Eetatee "B" or their eucceesora in interest.
The Eaeement deecribed hereinabove ie to and ehall run with thL land. No
modification of the boundariee of eaid Easement can be made without the prior
approval of Spokane County.
R.E. 7eX EXGTi1�7t
�� il:[�i
patg��J�j/ i9 �� f"i(:EU C � ..�0�!,'rDEp
Spoka C 6 u n ty Trea�, ii E n�;; : .�- C Q �
���'��� � � �
�uc �I i� �r3 i'�l `9[
� a�:
- ���L
Ji'iii� �''':�i� ,
:__r;��iflrt,y»s�i. rNTEROFFIC:E
L'�1}'
yo�. � ����b�� '���
IN WITNESS WHEitEOF, we have hereunto set our hande and ae a t ' th d o�
August, �992. /�
�
✓
gory Jeffreye
t ' �
mb rly R. Jeff e s �
STATE OF WASHINGTQN ) �
COUNTY QF SPOKANE ) 9s
On this day pereonally appeared before me Gregory D, and Kimberly R. ,7effreye
peraonally known to me to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument
and acknowledged the eaid inatrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of
eaid individual, for the ueea and purposee therein mentioned.
Given under my hand and aeal tttie ?8th day of August, 19S2.
�e•r•o•�����a�r��••. ./�r�s/�
. r�orn�Y Pusuc
� f�R THE STA1E OF W/�y�p�,�pN � ary Public ,
e RAYINORD T.MODM � In and for the state of Washingtion,
• �����L ���s� � reeiding at spokane, Waehington.
•��t���� � � � � �*i����•
notcedar/eample/jp
MI SSION MEDI CAL CENTER
BSP 04-08
LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTtON 15, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 44 EAST, W.M.
CtTY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGT.ON �
I
RA
. . ' � . . . . UNPLATTED . � i p�'� �F�
0 0
� �
� � � � g 2658.10 S8T21�36'W 2658.12 P0�2i 36'W. GPS SURVEY 10-07-99 — — — - _ � _�. _„ ' 1 .— •— • —
. � —. — — . - _ � � _, — ._ -—. -- 419.06 . � � � i
10 - �,7�` . Z �
t4�- ' � '— � glo.00 , � MISSION AVENUE �
75 0' Z q I
0 368.96'-(Ri)
r•S `"� _ �369.13 . S8T21�36'W . � 198.13 � I
NOR1H QUAHTER CORNER . - � "> � . � . � � .
FOUND 3'BRASS GW � � � - . . . .
- 171.00 --------------------- NEW .
W[1H 7f'AS PER ROS 125/6 � � . -------- ------ -- . R=20.00 �
, - _'-
- . � � � -------------- . . 10' UTILl7Y E4SEMENT . L-31.40 . \ I .
. � - ------ - D=89'S7'09' 1
. . . . .. . . � . .. . -30' . I 3d .
P
W Iw
W �
C
F 't
y o
FD RE61R M'0 CM ' 1.00'R/W DEDIG� - . � � . � N ..
� ;° ;� W 1
°s a°.os6s�2�' ��R � PARCEL 1 � PARCEt 2 '�-. .7 0
— • 40.527 SQ FT lo
''J6 � W M $1r661 $Q FT - �� rn
� �.,��p R/�y u� 13414 E. Mission Avenue o __ m �
� y . 13424 E. Mission Avenue �- 4d � �°no
W
. � Q - - C�y � . . . . � � O �
l0 V� � y V1 � . - � . O . . . . I 1� Q N I
_ N IV N . � m N . � N � �,h ' � N
h N.p
O ' � . ' . ' . I '
NORTHWEST CORNER DETAIL N �
NOT TO SCALE . � . � L- - -- �
� � - i0'X 50� DR4�NAGE � I .
� � � � EASEMENT �
� � ' � � - � . � . � AFN 9208310257 - -
� � UNPLATiED . . . . .
I
, I
� 1
i
, " _ . . . � .. 218.57 � � I . .
t7i.00 389.57 SeT21'36'W .
. . . J89.41 (R7) .
� � � � SEE RECORD OF SURVEY � � �
BOOK 69. PAGE 20 .. , . . �
� . UNPLATTED � - -
� � � . � . . . . . 30, I - 30�
�
���
���� ������
�-
� '�
�� � "�� � �
�
.�r _
+�� �
�` �
� �
�
� ��� I.]..I
� �� � � T � � �, �
_ � r�.
� � � �
�" �„L.,�
� � �
�
�� �
�
�
� s
� � �I�.�a�.�I��E
�. � e �����I��1�'
r�tN �LO� �r�. ��,a: �
�ffi�T �L�n E L�4 �G1�•� �� ���� �� ��
� • °al`F
� � �
��� r �
. r�
� � �
��t�����iY�� � �� ��, �� t �I�� '5� "�'� ��'.:� '
r�� . L�� �l�� '3� '��+�' ��,i� °
' � : .� ��-� �� '�i 'S!�"'� �,2��
--� ,
L,�-�. h�r� '�� ��'�W ��.�� .
? ��� ��k�r '�'�. ��L�'�E ��?.�� '
�
- �-� ���;�3�-�e .�� �
�� � �C�.T�= i� +4��`�� .
�� L�f��Tl��!� �� �
I�'i��I�� f������� ��1�L�TC'� .��
��� ���� � �
�
� ��
�r���;�� �� � � �� fi
��.
�
�
��� ����� ��������
L��:�T�f� 4����.��I
� �'�1F�1"���! �F T� i�E 1�'w ���T�� i�,
���ih�. FI���, �i ,I� , �IT� �I� ���I��t�� �'��,��� �rw�{�������r'��"r���'.���
�P�I��h�1� ����IV��'. �I_��H��l�a�f� �,,.�r� ����`��g,��'�T� ��
DRAFT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. 12-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY
WASHINGTON, EXTINGUISHING DRAINAGE EASEMENT AT 16621 EAST
INDIANA AVENUE, SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON, AND OTHER MATTERS
RELATING THERETO.
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley, Washington was granted a stormwater drainage
easement as part of the Indiana Avenue Extension Project #0122, which burdens property owned by
ENJOY! THE RIVER, LLC ETAL; and
WHEREAS, the easement in question is located on Spokane County Assessor's parcel number
45131.0112, at 16621 East Indiana Avenue. The easement was recorded on February 1, 2011, Spokane
County Auditor's recording number 5975650; and
WHEREAS, the easement was granted to accommodate stormwater treatment and disposal
facilities for a portion of the Indiana Avenue Extension Project#0122, but the development plan for the
property requires that the swale be relocated; and
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley approved a grading and drainage plan for the Beach
House Apartments and it was determined that the relocated stormwater swale provided the required
treatment and disposal capacity to replace the e�sting facility; and
WHEREAS, City staff has analyzed the request in terms of future need for stormwater treatment
and disposal facilities and determined that the easement is not necessary at its current location, for public
health, safety or welfare.
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane
County, Washington, as follows:
Section 1. Relinquishment of Easement Burdenin� Snokane Countv Assessor's narcel
number 45131.0112. The City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, as the successor in interest,
hereby relinquishes the easement granted for stormwater treatment and disposal purposes, Spokane
County Auditor's recording number 5975650.
Section 2. Authorization for Citv Mana�er to Execute Easement Extin�uishment
Document. The City Council of the City of Spokane Valley authorizes the City Manager to execute the
Easement Relinquishment, attached as Exhibit A to this Resolution, and all other documents necessary
thereto.
Section 3. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect upon adoption.
Adopted this day of November, 2012.
ATTEST: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Thomas E. Towey, Mayor
Approved as to Form:
Office of the City Attorney
Resolution 12-_Relinquishment of Easement—Beach House Apartments Page 1 of 2
AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO:
City of Spokane Valley
City Clerk
11707 E. Sprague, Suite 106
Spokane Valley,WA 99206
REFERENCE#: 5975650
GRANTOR: Centennial Properties,Inc.
GRANTEE: Governinent, City of Spokane Valley
SHORT LEGAL:
BACON'S ADDITION TO GREENACRES;PTN OF BLKS 33,34&35 LYG ELY OF LN DAF;BEG AT PT
ON SLY R/W LN OF MISSION AVE 1473.6FT M/L FR NE COR SEC 13-25-44;TH
S40DEG35MIN35SDSW 382.89FT;TH S 54DEG53MIN30SDSW 250.74FT;TH S61DEG18MIN26SDSW
179.63FT;TH S7DEG47MIN31SDSW 112.3FT M/L TO INTER WITH S LN SD BLK 35 AND TERM LN
DESC.; exc row for Indiana & Steen Parkway
ASSESSOR'S PROPERTY TAX PARCEL:45131.0112
RELEASE OF EASEMENT
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the City of Spokane Valley is the owner of an
easement acquired from Centennial Properties,Inc. (grantor)dated February 2,2011 and recorded,under
Auditor's File No. 5975650,records of Spokane County,Washington,over the real property described therein as
follows:
See attached Legal Description and E�iibit for Drainage Easement#1
The City of Spokane Valley does hereby abandon and release all rights acquired under said easement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,said corporation has caused this instrument to be executed this day
of ,20
BY:
Mike Jackson, City Manager
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
)
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
On this day of ,20�before me, the undersigned,a Notary
Public in and for the State of Washington,duly commissioned and sworn,personally appeared MIKE JACKSON
to me know to be the person who signed as City Manager of the municipal corporation that executed the within
and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be his/her free and voluntary act and deed and
the free and voluntary act and deed of the City of Spokane Valley for the uses and purposes therein mentioned;
and on oath stated that she/he authorized to execute the said instruction on behalf of said City of Spokane Valley.
IN WITNESS WHERE OF I have hereunto set my hand and off'icial seal the day and year first above
written.
(Signature of Notary)
(Print or stamp name of Notary)
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington,
residing at:
(City)
My Appointment E�ires:
02/01/2011 11:34:44 AM 5975650
Recording Fee $65.00 Page 1 of 4 F
Easement GOVERNMENT, CITY OF SPOKqNE VqLLEY
Spokane County Washington
I IIIIIII(I III III IIII I IIIII IIIIII IIII I)I III I I III I III I III I III I III IIIII III(III �
r
�
�V�en recorded ieturn 4�: ;
City of Spokane Valley j
Public Works Department !
11707 E.Sprague Ave.,Ste 304 �
Spokane Valley,WA 99206 (
i
�
I
Document Title: Drainaqe Easement
Grantor(s): Centennial Properties,Inc. -
Grantee: Government Citv of Spokane Valley
Location: NE%4 Section 13 T25N R44E �
Legal Description: j
BACON'S ADDITION TO GREENACRES; PTN OF BLKS 33, 34&35 LYG ELY OF LN DAF; BEG AT PT i
ON SLY R/W LN OF MISSION AVE 1473.6FT M/L FR NE COR SEC 13-25-44;TH
� S40DEG35MIN35SDSW 382.89FT; TH S 54DEG53MIN30SDSW 250.74FT;TH S61DEG18MIN26SDSW I
179.63FT;TH S7DEG47MIN31SDSW 112.3FT M/L TO INTER WITH S LN SD BLK35 AND TERM LN �'
DESC. I
Assessor's Property Tax Parcel Number or Account Number. 45131.0112 �
I
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT I
Spokane Valley, Washington
DRAINAGE EASEMENT
IN THE MATTER OF Indiana Avenue Extension Proiect,#0112.
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the Grantor, Centennial Properties, Inc. for and in �
consideration of Mutual Benefits, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, grant(s) to the City of '
Spokane Valley (Grantee), a municipai corporation in the State of Washington, an Easement over, under, �
upon and across the hereinafter described lands situated in the City of Spokane Valley, County of �
Spokane, State of Washington: �
See attached Drainaqe Easement#1 Lepal Description and Exhibit
i
AFFECTS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO(S): 45131.0112 �
I
;
The Drainage Easement granted to the City of Spokane Valley and its authorized agents is for the sole ;
purpose of allowing construction, operation, and maintenance of a stormwater treatment swale inciuding ,
stormdrain piping and outfall; catchbasins and dryweils; future underground irrigation waterline; and , ;
electrical power and controi wiring in underground conduit. The Grantor(s) hereby agree not to obstruct !
access to the storm drain pipe, irrigation line and wiring to the above-described lands. The Grantor(s) �
Page 1 of 2 I�
R.E.Excise Tax Exempt
Date a - I �� I f i
Spokane County Treas �' � � � � i
gy � ��1� F� a �.; � ��r� ;��j " � li
��\ �. .,��
j
�
hereby agrees to limit the improvements within the easement to landscaping consisting of grasses,
shallow-rooted shrubs, but not trees or deeply rooted plants. The Grantee will not be responsible for �
replacement or repair of any improvements that the Grantor may place within the drainage easement, nor ��,
shall the Grantee be responsible to repair, maintain, or replace any damage to improvements, other than
replacement of grasses and shallow-rooted shrubs that are damaged by work of Grantee in the easement
area, that the Grantor(s) or assignees may place in the drainage easer�ent if the Gr�n#ee, �# it'� sal�
discretion, replaces or repairs the stormdrain piping and ouifall; stormwater treatr�ent swale including ;
catchbasins and drywells; future installation or maintenance of underground irrigation waterline; and ;
electrical power and controi wiring in underground wiring.
The City of Spokane Valley accepts compiete and total responsibility for the construction and perpetual ` �
maintenance of the public drainage facilities located within said Easement per Project#0112 plans on file
in the office of the City of Spokane Valley Public Works Department and as amended by the Director of
Pubiic Works. The Grantee shall not be responsible to replace, repair, or maintain any other
improvements.
The Easement and the agreements and duties provided for herein shall run with the land and shail be '
binding on, and shali inure to the benefit of the parties referenced herein, their heirs, successors and
assigns. -
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,_ �2 l,t.�P.1/'�lU�vz e�.� have hereunto set ��'1.�c.r
hand(s) and seal(s)this�day of c�b-+�w�A..►�t a , 20 l( . �
By: By; �
Titl Title: u.�:i.�c 1.�:��,r v�- i
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) j
ss
�
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that (�-�G � �
(is/are) the individual(s)who appeared before me, an said individuai(s) acknowledged that(he/she/they) �
signed this instrument, and acknowledged it to be (his/heNtheir) free and voluntary act for the uses and
purposes mentioned in this instrument.
Dated this 2� day of ��i , 20�� .
I
�
. ���oo�\\\\1141 �
� , -"� �-t,. 7 , � :,�-�•� ,
;` M�BA� ,Q ���� OTARY PUBLIC I and the Sta o� on, i
= ��:�`oN��� '''a p �i Residing at �`�> i
— '� -y` �',0.'4 G� �i
_�_� o �y '��%�c� ; My appointmenf ex ires: �
� 2so = � :
; (��� - •' � Z _
' i�i ,ovB�,�'�� �� -- \e\��\i\\\\\II1���' I
%;. N ,,,�, 8-29- .-'�^ - �-� '��NE fl�l.�,�� ►/�� �
�� �• ���I������.a�" � \�`��������1�11ry���'O�/ /� II
�/ �';� �r.:�._ — �_� tr�gSiO/y q���.p /�
f'�I{ � V�=0��10TA �'A�4 iQ j i
�,�,�,,�`�`��'�' i %V ��m; ��j ,
i Lq % ' ' ` in%177 i
� ��% �;�B��o = � Page 2 of 2 ,
'���O,c''29���1`��G��_ �
��1�� �ASH�N�`.� i
��t111\\>�����
i
C
, Legal Description
Drainage Easement#1
For (
Tax Parcel No.45131.0112
A portion the North Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 13, Township 25 North,Range 44
East, Willamette Meridian, City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, more
particulazly described as follows;
�
COMMENCIlVG at the Northeast corner of said Section 13; thence N89°57'44'W along the
North line of said Section 13 a distance of 1421.20 feet; thence S00°02'16'W a distance of
453.86 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, from which point the Northeast comer of said
Section 13 bears N72°19'37"E a distance of 1491.91 feet; thence S72°15'S6"E a distance of
101.83 feet; thence N47°33'07"E a distance of 21.52 feet; thence S 17°44'04'W a distance of
34.30 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the Northwest and hav,ing a radius of
467.50 feet; thence Southwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 21°32'24"an arc
distance of 175.75 to the intersection with the North line of Lot 36 of Bacon's Addirion to
Greenacres,recorded in Book"J"of Plats, Page 15; thence N89°52'22"W along said North line �
a distance of 83.61 feet; thence Np0°00'00"E a distance of 77.90 feet; thence N27°23'28"E a
distance of 144.35 feet to the P4INT 4F BEGINNING.
�
I
Containing 22,481 square feet more or less
i
�EL E. �,
$ oFx4s o
,���w �N �
�� �
�
_ ,
o '
��'��
°N�az�r�� '
��,r� _� _
�
'I
;
r
i
� EXHIBIT #1 ' I
DRAINAGE EASEMENT �1 ALONG INDIANA AVE RIGHT OF WAY
PORTiON OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF
SEC710N 13, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 44 EAST, W.M.,
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON .
��I J.���1��J��1���� I I
r� ' ��a������/ `���e I�
�� �`L..� � �
___ M _ FLORA ROAQ,�,__
~ � CURVE 7A8LE rr—
POIN�j OF �� � � WRVE RADIUS LENGTH 7ANGENT CH�RD DELTA i
COI,�I�ENCEAIENT i I �. C1 467.50' 175.75' 88.93' 174.72' 2132'24
� i � `� 1 1
� � I . utie rae�e � ; �
F_________t �. UNE IENGTH BEARING 1 � I
� � � U 101.83 S72`I5'S6'E j �
� I � L2 21.52 N47'33'07'E I �
i � � � L3 34.30 St7'44'04'W i �
� L4 83.61 N89'52'22hY I �
I I '� L5 77.90 N00'00'00'E j 1
j � i_ ;� •` L6 140.35 N27'23'28"E j I
�---------- �� • i
� � I'�,� `�. I ,� �
i ' i^ �` ;\ ;___
I '
j � Zi�, ti I
� � _ �
i � I �°� �� {
•----�---------{ � ��,
� , �� � ,. I
I � � �� \ �
� i
� � � ` • i
1��--2�0�0� I � ` \ i
�Iz�• $,` \, � i �
; TAX n� � ----
Z, \ PARCEL � �"'-' i
_ �ORTH LJNE ;
� 45131.0112 �� � ; � OF LOT 36
1I �\ � BACON
..� � i ADDIT10N TO
I ( � �� DRAINAG� EASEI�ENT �1 i �
� `. � GREENACRES �
� `� \REA 22��841 S.F. �
I �
� I � ��ti �� � i
`�e\ �. i
� �. �l� -
� � ���
I 1 `
`t�� i
! ' POINT OF �. ��
_ BEGINNING !` '
���� 500'02'16'H/ � 453.86' _•�•_. �
i ��`. � � ;
`gt s.�
e�c wssaetw�ea �4��o4a �I
�asao c Niruouu v�cw�r. �
�ulTe 1Oo
sroRwHe vn«cr
w�x�NUTOH9G21• �
�sef�v�e.o
r ses.a�so..
e�enaaoo.00w � i
wiaeH�tccrua[ � I� I
. [Hew«�iwo rw+w�wo
. NMDiOAPt AROMIttGTUR[
NND�YRV[YINO
&�2W9\09-0361 WSV IImIANA EXTEt�SO1�dPo�1�IT FOR GRF7NAGE ESMT/t.dvp 3LB/2010 1TIW5 PM PST 1 �! i
il
i
�
STOR�I DRAIN PER
THE BEACH HOUSE AT fASB�R�FR
TRAILHEAD GRADING PLANS. FMFNT
_ �/ am' Y � _ - +.t I
� T�i�B��x HfliT�� _ .� 1� `�,�,`__
_ ���A,�IL�AD#1PTS-_ �� _ � .!�'�jr'3S;S �
_ _ _ _ = New Storm Drainage _ - �. `"f#'R� I
_ - Easement - rr��,�� � I;
.J�
- �? - _�.�-� � �
_ _ _ _ �= _ � 11r`,��
- _ _ - -_ _ -
= �& - - - _ � � �� /I�f��. �
<.
. . � �
- _ �.P��� �
L� - :...: %�,.f'�' C
.. ..:::..................... `
.........:..............
....:::................ -
.........................
.........................
...::::..:::::::�::�:::.
_ 4 ;_ °—�,,," � `� j ,� �;i�5 ,_�
- _ - , ,
- �
rr:r::°r::ri�f:t.�.::'.;;:;;.cc�'.'r.�;:;+:rr`i:'::�irc`.;r;`ir.;;:f::. ��.
.......... ...:..::•'.
'i:. �• ��' -'� �._ �!��t , f
r , � t r }� '� �
... ::::ii�:i+::;::�::•:•� �
�:: ......•....
F: :::::•:�
::::.. .. ..:r:::'r::iii`:��:ri' . _
........:::•..............
• ,:•�.:::•.................:
J .:::�.::::•...... •.....::::1�:' - - �.: = f
': ................... I
... •...,
.............................. --: .
.. ....:::::::::::::::'
.. ...�... . .-
..:. ...::•.::•.:::::. . _` -f7� ' ' '
... .... _ .:_ ...:-_ _
� . .
_ !
•.::. ........ .. . ti
...... •...............'":::::: ":'-•• �_ _ -
.......:::::::::... L10
...........................
............ ..:::::-
,..... .....................:::. �
.............. �
..... ......:::.
::..................... .......... ,
::::. .............::....:•... -
.... ...........::::.... �
... .......... •.:::... /
,/
• ........::..... ....... _ �,,�Ff f r
........., •.... L9
; , �,: ,�,, � ��,,,,.
LB . _ /,�j�� � '� �F+� '
� ��� _ __ . /%, � ,
o .�'' � �'�,,��-�;�
. ��' ' = -= ���,, //
J,, � �/ �,
- _ _ � ✓� �� ��1 �r'l�lr���"' ��
_ � �'.. � f ,_ . y�,p�'p f`�'/
_ _ _ .� ���� f�� r� ✓�
� �./f � �>� /'_A f�/
_ _ _ � � �.�/��
_ �' �i_ -,..,,j, �,i%,,�� l/'
- / �,✓ � �Ss" ;'�"°//
- . �,,�� ��., ;,� °`(,�.
_ _- �,.� ,.,F�J ��� �J�, / � f�
�'� �,� r� ,Nf�,e' /•.
_ _ � //;. c�`y o ��>°`` ;.r� DRAINAGE EASE�IENT
- ` F � , �'�� GRANTED TO CITY OF
. _, �f,,�A'� , � O � i
- ''� � ,;-Fy F?�,��'.°��j� SPOKANE VALLEY. F
_ <'',r�,�,"����v� � � .�"��� (
_ _ /�°�� ,��,4�r , ,;�,J-�A"r' I
� �9'S� � iFi�Y�;%r� Fff e Pf,
� _- - _ �O.r�'`°�".,,.., �',.`l'4 �'f'�°f�,�r// _._____—_—_'_'_�__—.
st��..� "R,y°.��i c �r, .��...�. ��
-�, r
y _e�„���';f'��a,S�..,�
L1NE TABLE ' ��-�-�� �
C:��,/ � --�
�_�it'+�+`i;(� ��:�=i�.d"�f=i s
LINE DISTANCE BEARING LINE DISTANCE BEARING
L1 50.07' S81'24'35"W L9 58.00� N43'19'11"E ; ������ �a o� ,""6<�`:7 ;
,,.,„�
L2 57.33' S26'58'14"W L10 59J2� N75'19'11"E `Project�;%_ j
L3 101.07� S76'26'23"W Lf 1 85.27' S82'49'53"E i -_�^T�_�_____—� �
lVarn�_�----
L4 89.98' N82'49'S3°W L12 98.52' N76'26'23°E � — --
L5 47.17' N48'31'22"W L13 54.15' S14'41�28"E L�"'rT�" ' , �` D 11--�L-____ '
L6 121.00� S76'19'11"W L14 43.90� Nt4'41'28°W ����D�� 1—� � i
U 80.00' S13'40�49"E L15 52.32� N26'S8'14"E �
LB 42.00' N87'19'11"E L16 34.55� N81'24'35"E SCALE 1"=ao'
J.R. �ONNETT ENGINEERING THE BEACH HOUSE AT TRAILHEAD
DRAINAGE EASEMENT
CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL CONSULTING AND DESIGN AFFECTSPARCELN0.45131.0112&��1��1�t���� ��
803 E.3RD AVENUE ,1RBE 70B#:11-139.10 �SV Develo�nent _ngir��er�ng �
SP01(ANE,WASHINCTON 99202 I
(509)534-5929/FAR(509)534-4014 DATE:MARCH 22,2012
� � Fi o12 j
i
� Pf-oject# � �'�`Z-��2-'��
�Uame.e)�-`� � u �'
Submittal # 2- I
I
�.ti' '` 16621 E. Indiana
�', ? �� . � �,�, �� �'���y%" � �. ��� ..=— . y:r'. � �„' `�� i �
°� ' .. y + � 45124.02C14
~ ~ 45124.0140��. , y
� ' '� � 45124.Q138' ��' '��'
. r• s ii� 45124.p138 . ,a •
� _ -45125.9157 �� � "i;r� ,� . ¢� ; . ���.
..._ . .
- � ,':;' � x
a , , riS1J5.9U1(}� �y ,
��" �
r�p�tR ,. �.p µ;� r �rt. ri ' ` ! fc c,��`J' �,r�' �2 dE r R - � 55VO���F'?k '�
�1v � � ��� � r�' ��,�- '��,� ` �. _ � 01d Mission Av f _ ... . . , ,. . _ _, _ �r.-
. . � �
q�'� ., ., ,�
�Y.ii�'�.� .KN�. �-:h""` �. �j
� �,/ �
.� _
. ' ..y.. "'''`-
�
+R , i f! y,'�e4•�/ �P~i Pr�'d�''l'!� �°M.Y'y � ��"*',� f'�''1��n � � �� .
�'45135 90077 �,�1:.�'� +� `� � �,. av� � Y ,• ,,�� � �"'
� �a +��' � ���f��$ � �4x M ' � � !�� �� � `�.t"
r. � ,�� r J �ci,� ,.�. '�.�F �, °� � � 'y
d��� . A . `� .w� ,�fi� ' y Y �� � �,
, . , �
- ��#� -+�F � � � Jh ����'... � � N '�}~•a �.� � }} 7 .e',.\ _
.. 1 . •F . �, �.�. � ..� . �-. �
?���^F��s��`"��'�� � ' ,..�,. '�'��f �''� y��,�y� ,� , 45131.0117 ,�
� �^'���`,�.� b ���,.,/� •¢¢�,,,,.. �a� .� �� Existing Drainage h ' `; ,a�
�Cs�. ; �^. �� Y 'TSz 1£ � A �^! � . .,� � -_ a
,: � t�� Easement ,�� •a '���
: �� �� � �
`T �s � � � �wa.. � �,,
� � -..r-"*+ti3-r � v � � . ,p* ' '-'' v. . .
"' � � . ��4�' 'n � ryr. � _
� �il�l illl� ��� D � 'x"' �`
. ., ,.. ,
..� " . , � �,..r, 1 . � �tlF'�;� y ; .. . .�1... . . • 4���2.{��1�.�.� �
: �,�a t a �� y �
� + � • �`�. �� � f 4�' � ����• '� ' �
Q., � Y a �
•�°,�� y� ���"'�•�' :.: Q5131.U11G � ,�►,�. ,�� � 4a_,
.�'" '�� ,..� s� . ♦ � :1t .
��!y � �1 4 �� �"_ v,'� e.. �i. � ..1�
�;� � �'¢ �� ,
r r �. . �. . � .�' � ',, .
� �, ',;� ; �` '.� ,�, � ,� � ���,a Q�` 5�P C� K:A�hJ�E 114�4 L L E Y �i
. � . � . � �.
� � �,�,' ; ,�, - -�� $�,��s�� ,rd. ,� �..�,.
-�•�� .�!"j '# .,+ �;,. �p� ��� � ��n ��', ^'�`'� 'Y , s� , ■ - 451_31.C71�4 ��
. .` .'.}, � ��� ',,� � 4 � ��. �,,'�, �ry�- . '4� , ��.
�A * r � +�,; �F '�"`��'�1Y" , ,
`� . �f � �, _ 45131.Q103 �
�"rs :�'•� ' ;i, ' -� �.',� �� �.w.
,. . '� . `. ` .. �. �- 4 :;�.
,, = , ,,.
, � �' . ` � ��` �.F _ ,
� , �t� 45131.C1117 . - _. � .
�• '���...�< � �M: �� � v.�: _: * .. . � -..
"f �A � .
R , 1�'+ r 'i
. ." '�� � �� � .
.� , w
- _ , 45131.�7315 .. ,. .�_ , 45131.0107
�,. ._
, 45135.(]31�1 .`A� •�t
� i� �i
. . .. .:� �f.. . .. . . . _ --" •rA�� . .. � ..� ��i ..,,
V
t, � ' � ,{4n 45131,05G1 �� � ��.
, — .,..
971 l+i� , St>Y't+l�� . � ,����dn � � ...°�_ � ♦ �
�
. .,. a P �-----..�s : . ,
� �-�
. .-,, •�.. -. , -•:,
� k- �
�, ,,.<�v�� 4s131.as2fl c-, � - �
�
�. � �; -�,� �,. , � .
_�—�`f- �,- 45131.Q519 � w �"'W ; �� � _ ��-r
�r�°�_ ����� �y O H . � ��.. y -, , Wbr.� - �51�1-�521� ''r.,
�' -± 45131,��fl2 � o-• v '°�'�o��
�
45131.C142� � - p ��° , o ' - �"'�.
. -r 45131.0517 .-., �, i � e� � � � ._
45135.a414' 45131.U419 Y � '� ��*�''� "
r,�++r+�,�., �� � �45131.��13 i
451� .s
R� 1
rrx. _ s ., `t . ' �- . ., ''�� . :;��.�--��°"` --��
495.3 0 247.64 495.3 Feet O
This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only.Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate,current,or otherwise
reliable.
DRAFT
ADVANCE AGENDA
For Planning Discussion Purposes Only
as of November 7, 2012; 1:30 p.m.
Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative
To: Council & Staff
From: City Clerk, by direction of City Manager
Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings
November 20,2012—No Meetin�. Thanks�ivin�Week
November 27,2012—No Meetin�(NLC Conference in Boston, Nov 27—Dec 1)
December 4,2012, Studv Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Nov 26]
ACTION ITEMS:
1. Resolution Extinguishing Easement(Beach House Apts)—Gabe Gallinger (10 minutes)
2. Resolution Extinguishing Easement(Cancer Center)—Gabe Gallinger (10 minutes)
NON-ACTION ITEMS
3. Legislative Update—Briahna Taylor (30 minutes)
4. Shoreline Master Plan, Restoration Plan Report—Lori Barlow (20 minutes)
5. Report on 2013 Fees—Mark Calhoun (10 minutes)
6. Admin Report: Update on Development Projects—John Hohman (20 minutes)
7. Admin Report: Street Maintenance Contract Renewal-Eric Guth (20 minutes)
8. Admin Report: Street Sweeping Contract Renewal—Eric Guth (20 minutes)
9. Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
10. Info Only: Department Reports (normally due for Nov 27 meeting); Planning Commission minutes
[*estimated meeting: 145 minutes]
December 11,2012,Formal Meetin�Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Dec 3]
1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll, minutes) (5 minutes)
2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 12-028 Multi-Family Regulations—Mike Basinger (15 minutes)
3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 12-029, Commercial Vehicles—Cary Driskell (15 minutes)
4.Proposed Resolution: Master List Commercial Vehicle Routes—Cary Driskell (10 minutes)
5. Proposed Resolution: Amending Fees for 2013 —Mark Calhoun (10 minutes)
6. Proposed Resolution Accepting Restoration Plan of the SMP—Lori Barlow (10 minutes)
7. Motion Consideration: Lodging Tax Allocation of Funds—Mark Calhoun (30 minutes)
8. Motion Consideration: Street Maintenance Contract Renewal—Eric Guth (15 minutes)
9. Motion Consideration: Street Sweeping Contract Renewal—Eric Guth (10 minutes)
10. Motion Consideration: Mayoral Appointments to Planning Commission, Committees, etc. (15 minutes)
11. Economic Development Ad Hoc Committee Report—Councilmember Wick (20 minutes)
12. Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 160 minutes]
December 18,2012, Studv Session Format, 6:00 n.m. [due Mon,Dec 10]
1. Advance Agenda
2. Info Only: Department Reports [*estimated meeting: minutes]
December 25,2012.No meeting. Christmas week
Januarv 1,2013.No meetin�. New Year's Dav
Draft Advance Agenda ll/8/2012 9:23:39 AM Page 1 of 2
Januarv 8,2013,Formal Meetin�Format,6:00 n.m. [due Mon,Dec 31]
Proclamation: Spokane T�alley's Tenth Anniversary
1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes)
2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
3. Information Only: Planning Commission Minutes [*estimated meeting: minutes]
Januarv 15,2013, Studv Session Format, 6:00 n.m. [due Mon,Jan 7]
1. Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
Januarv 22,2013,Formal Meetin�Format, 6:00 n.m. [due Mon,Jan 14]
1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll, minutes) (5 minutes)
2. Advance Agenda
3. Information Only: Dept Reports;Planning Commission Minutes [*estimated meeting: minutes]
Januarv 29,2013, Studv Session Format, 6:00 n.m. [due Mon,Jan 21]
1. Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
Februarv 5,2013,Studv Session Format, 6:00 n.m. [due Mon,Jan 28]
1. Advance Agenda
(5 minutes)
Februarv 12,2013,Possible No Meetin�(Citv Legislative Action Conference fCLACI in Olvmpia)
Feb 19,2013 Winter Workshop (Note:no evenin�Studv Session) 8:30 a.m.—5:00 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers
Tentative Topics:
Manufactured Homes; Council Goals; Legislative Agenda; Council Meeting Processes
Ten-Year Anniversary; Park/Library Update; City Hall; Business Route Signage
February 26,2013,Formal Meetin�Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Feb 18]
1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll, minutes) (5 minutes)
2. Advance Agenda
3. Info Only: Department Reports; Planning Commission Minutes
Februarv, 28, 2012(tentative) —Citv Hall at the Mall
OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS:
ADA Transition Plan Revenue Policy, Cost Recovery
Animal Control Snow Plows, Discussion of
Arts Council Solid Waste Analysis
Bidding Contracts (SVMC 3.—bidding exceptions) Speed Limits (overall system)
Donation Policy Stormwater Projects
Future Acquisition Areas Regional Transportation Issues
Gateway, Regional MOU
Pedestrian/Bicycle Grant Program
PEG Funds (Education)
Prosecution Services *time for public or Council comments not included
Public Safety Contract,Proposed Amendment
Draft Advance Agenda ll/8/2012 9:23:39 AM Page 2 of 2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: November 13th, 2012 Department Director Approval: ❑
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
� information ❑ admin. Report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Street and Stormwater Maintenance Contract Renewal — Poe
Asphalt Inc.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Street and Stormwater Maintenance Contract
Approval on April 24, 2007, Contract Renewals in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012.
BACKGROUND:
The City conducted an RFP process in March 2007. By unanimous approval in April 2007
Council awarded the contract to Poe Asphalt Paving and authorized the City Manager to sign
the contract and future seven-year renewal options. Poe Asphalt Paving has provided
satisfactory service during all contract years.
This contract is a Cost Plus contract, meaning we pay all direct costs plus an overhead and
profit percentage (OH & P). There is a 22% OH & P on Direct Costs and 8% OH & P on
Subcontractors.
The 2012 contract amount was $1,685,119, which included $1,545,119 for Street and
Stormwater Repair and $140,000 for snow removal.
The 2013 Contract amount is $1,506,663, which includes $1,366,663 in Street Maintenance
(reduction of$178,456) and $140,000 in snow removal. The reduction in this contract amount is
due to a change in the scope of work. This contract will no longer construct mill and overlays.
Staff will present an Admin Report on December 4th. The Motion Consideration to authorize the
City Manager to sign this contract will come before council December 11`h. It is important to
have this contract signed by December 31St because this contract supplies drivers for Snow
Removal.
We are currently working with Poe Asphalt Inc. to determine the hourly rates for 2013. The
rates will be presented with the administrative report on December 4th, 2012.
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The contract will be funded by the approved 2013 budget.
STAFF CONTACT: Eric Guth
ATTACHMENTS: 2013 Draft Option Year Contract
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
�{�11���,��; CARY P. DRISKELL- GTY ATTORNEY
� ERIK J. LAMB - DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY
Vall�� 11707 East S ra ue Ave. Suite 103 ♦ S okane Valle WA 99206
P � � P Y�
509.720.5105 ♦ Fax: 509.688.0299 ♦ cityattorneyC�spokanevalley.org
December 20, 2012
Poe Asphalt Paving, Inc.
2732 North Beck Road
Post Falls, ID 83854
Re: Implementation of 2013 option year-Agreement for Street and Stormwater
Maintenance and Repair Services, executed May 11, 2007
*
Dear Mr. Griffith: ��
The City executed a contract for provision of Street and Stormwater Maintenance and
Repair Services on May 1l, 2007 by and between the City of Spokane Valley, hereinafter
"Ciry" and Poe Asphalt Paving, Inc., hereinafter "Contractor" and jointly referred to as
"Parties."
The Request for Proposal states that it was for one year, with seven optional one-year
terms possible if the parties mutually agree to exercise the options each year. This is the
sixth of seven possible option years that can be exercised and runs through December 31,
2013.
The City would like to exercise the 2013 option year of the Agreement. The
Compensation as outlined in Exhibit A, 2012 Cost Proposal, includes the labor and
material cost negotiated and shall not exceed $1,506,663. The contract includes
$140,000 for snow removal operations. The history of the annual renewals is set forth as
follows:
Original contract amount .........................................$ 1,175,119.00
2008 Renewal ......................................................$ 1,475,ll9.00
2009 Renewal ..... ................................................$ 1,175,119.00
2010 Renewal......................................................$ 1,375,ll 9.00
20ll Renewal......................................................$ 1,545,119.00
2012 Renewal ......................................................$ 1,685,119.00
2013 Renewal......................................................$ 1,506,663.00
This contract option year will use the Asphalt Cost Price Adjustment per WSDOT Spec
5-04.5. The Contractor shall provide the cost adjustment for asphalt prices monthly and
include this information with each monthly invoice.
All of the other contract provisions contained in the original agreement are in place and
will remain unchanged in exercising this option year.
If you are in agreement with exercising the 2013 option year, please sign below to
acknowledge the receipt and concurrence to perform the 2013 option year. Please return
two copies to the City for execution, along with current insurance information. A fully
executed original copy will be mailed to you for your files.
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY POE ASPHALT PAVING, 1NC.
Mike Jackson, City Manager Name
Title
ATTEST:
`
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Office of the Ciry Attorney �
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: November 13th, 2012 Department Director Approval: ❑
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
� information ❑ admin. Report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Street Sweeping Contract Renewal —AAA Sweeping
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Street Sweeping Contract Approval on March 3, 2007
and Contract renewal in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012.
BACKGROUND:
The City conducted a RFP process in March 2007. In April 2007, the Council awarded the
contract to AAA Sweeping by the following motion:
2. Motion Consideration: Street Sweepinq Request for Proposals—John Hohman
Engineer Hohman explained that this issue was previously presented to Council November 14
and February 20; and that staff now seeks approval of the contract to AAA Sweeping in an
amount not to exceed $473,687. It was moved by Councilmember Denenny and seconded to
award the contract to AAA Sweeping in an amount not to exceed$473,687 and authorize the City
Manager to sign the contract and future seven-year renewal options as provided in the RFP
documents. Mayor Wilhite invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by
Acclamation: In Favor. Unanimous. Opposed:None. Abstentions:None. Motion Carried.
The contract was for one year with seven one-year renewal options which may be exercised by the City.
AAA Sweeping provided a good level of service during 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012. The
2012 contract amount was approved at $490,199.94. The 2013 contract will be the sixth of seven
possible option years and the amount will stay the same at$490,199.94.
We are currently working with AAA Sweeping to determine the hourly rates for 2013 and they
will be provided with the administrative report on December 4`h, 2012.
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The contract will be funded by the approved 2013 budget.
STAFF CONTACT: Eric Guth
ATTACHMENTS: 2013 option year contract
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
�{�11���,��; CARY P. DRISKELL- GTY ATTORNEY
� ERIK J. LAMB - DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY
Vall�� 11707 East S ra ue Ave. Suite 103 ♦ S okane Valle WA 99206
P � � P Y�
509.720.5105 ♦ Fax: 509.688.0299 ♦ cityattorneyC�spokanevalley.org
December 20, 2012
AAA Sweeping, LLC
PO Box 624
Veradale, WA 99037
Re: Implementation of 2013 option year, Agreement for Street Sweeping Services, 07-
021, executed March 13, 2007
Dear Mr. Sargent:
The Ciry executed a contract for provision of Street Sweeping Services on March 13,
2007 by and between the City of Spokane Valley, hereinafter "City", and AAA
Sweeping, LLC, hereinafter"Contractor" and jointly referred to as "Parties."
The Request for Proposal states that it was for one year, with seven optional one-year
terms possible if the parties mutually agree to exercise the options each year. This is the
sixth of seven possible option years that can be exercised and runs through December 31,
2012.
The City would like to exercise the 2013 option year of the Agreement. The
Compensation as outlined in Exhibit A, 2013 Cost Proposal, includes the labor and
material cost negotiated and shall not exceed $490,199.94. The history of the annual
renewals is set forth as follows:
Original contract amount .........................................$ 473,687.00
2008 Renewal ......................................................$ 479,717.02
2009 Renewal ..... ................................................$ 490,199.94
2010 Renewal......................................................$ 490,199.94
20ll Renewal......................................................$ 490,199.94
2012 Renewal ......................................................$ 490,199.94
2013 Renewal......................................................$ 490,199.94
All of the other contract provisions contained in the original agreement are in place and
will remain unchanged in exercising this option year.
If you are in agreement with exercising the 2013 option year, please sign below to
acknowledge the receipt and concurrence to perform the 2013 option year. Please return
two copies to the Ciry for execution, along with current insurance information. A fully
executed original copy will be mailed to you for your files.
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY AAA SWEEPING, LLC
Mike Jackson, City Manager Name
Title
ATTEST:
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
�
Office of the City Attorney
�
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: November 13, 2012 Department Director Approval: ❑
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
� information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Adding mailers to utility bills
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: n/a
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None
BACKGROUND:
At the August 21, 2012 Council Study Session, Councilmember Grassel suggested marketing
Spokane Valley through notices included in utility bills.
(As part of analyzing the information below, it is important to note that the number of mailing
addresses in Spokane Valley includes about 36,625 residences and 5000 businesses for an
estimated total of about 41,625.)
The question was posed to nineteen utility providers, including power, water, sewer, and cable
entities.
Four indicated that they might/would allow us to include inserts (sized to fit in their standard #10
envelope). As the question had not arisen before, they were unable to provide information on
costs. Availability, frequency, and considerations varied:
• Spokane County Utilities advised they might allow us to include an insert once a year
(mailings are done monthly), and that we might be able to send to just their Spokane Valley
customers, of which they estimated to be between 27,000 to 29,000. Costs would be
determined at the time and would depend on number of mailers, sizes, postage costs, etc.
• Sunshine Disposal indicated that they might be willing to let us include an insert; however
they only serve large and industrial customers. The cost would be insertion cost plus
whatever additional postage, plus our cost to provide the preprinted materials.
• Vera Water & Power indicated they might allow us to occasionally include an insert in their
quarterly billings only if the information pertained to Vera Water & Power or benefitted their
customers, but it could not be limited to just their Spokane Valley customers (their total
customer base is 10,400). They cautioned that it would not be available on a regular basis.
The cost would be based on the actual cost for their provider to print the insert and for
inserting it as well as any additional postage that would be required.
• Waste Management indicated they would be willing to include our insert in their mailing;
however, they only cover about 65 percent of Spokane Valley addresses, and they bill
quarterly at various times throughout the month. Mailing is coordinated out of Phoenix, so
would require packaging mailers and shipping in advance. Not all customers would receive
the information at the same time. Cost would be our printing costs plus shipping to Phoenix,
plus any additional postage that might be required, as well as costs to insert.
Walt's Mailing estimated the cost for a single 8.5x11 self-mailer delivered to all Spokane Valley
business and residential addresses to be about $10,500, or just under twenty cents a copy.
Page 1 of 2
Currently, the four page, tabloid-sized newsprint HotTopic Community Newsletter is inserted
semi-annually in the Spokesman Review and Valley News Herald, and copies are available to
pick up at seventeen Spokane Valley locations for a total distribution of 20,000. It is also
distributed via email to over 500 subscribers in addition to distribution via RSS Feed and on the
city website. Each edition currently costs about $2100 to print and distribute, or about ten and a
half cents per copy.
OPTIONS: Information only
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: n/a
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: n/a
STAFF CONTACT: Carolbelle Branch, Public Information Officer
ATTACHMENTS: None
Page 2 of 2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: November 13th, 2012 Department Director Approval: ❑
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
� information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Community Minded Television (CMTV) 2012 Annual Report
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Cable Franchise Agreement Ordinance 09-034
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
• Approval of Comcast Cable Franchise December 1, 2009
• Approval of CMTV Public Access Agreement May 10, 2011
BACKGROUND: One of the requirements of the cable franchise agreement is for Comcast to
provide the City funding to be used for capital purchases associated with the creation and
broadcasting of public, educational, and governmental (PEG) programming. On May 10, 2011
the City selected CMTV to be the City's public access channel manager thereby allowing the
City to make PEG disbursements for public access. To date, the City has reimbursed CMTV for
approximately $41,293 in qualifying PEG expenditures. In accordance with the agreement
CMTV is to provide an annual report to the City Council—including a summary of the prior
year's activities, a programming schedule, an accounting of the equipment purchased with City
PEG funds (including the cost and purpose to which the equipment is being used) and a capital
request for the upcoming year. The annual report was received and reviewed by staff and
meets all of the requirements of the agreement.
OPTIONS: N/A
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: N/A
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A
STAFF CONTACT: John Pietro, Administrative Analyst
ATTACHMENTS: CMTV Narrative Report and Accompanying Documents
.
d'Commun[ty 25 W. Main Ave. ° 509-444-3381
:■
��■^� Minded $lllte ��a � community-mindedtv,org
���� Television Spokane, WA 9920[ ' cmtv@community-minded,org
COMMUNITY-MINDED TELEVISION
� ANNUAL REPORT �
,
October 1, 2012
Coininuni�y-Minded En�erprises (CME), Community Cable Channel Managei•far Spakane Cable
Channel 14, submits this preliminary annual report to the Spokane Valley City Council and s�aff,
and Comcast Cable, as delineated in the April 2011 agreement between CME and the City of
Spokaiie Valley. The CABLE Advisory Board having dissolved in 2010, are nat included in this
year's report.
As anticipated in the 2011 year, Community-Minded Television's successes during 2012 have
pushed for�vard CME's vision for CMTV to become a community-enhancing resaurce.
Al�l�ough�here]�ave been budget shartfalls since its inception, CMTV l�as built a stable
community resource nat anly utilized by the general public,but alsa by nonprofit organizations,
faith-based organizations, seivice agencies, disadvantaged young adults,Native Americans,
senior citizens, wild animal activists and social orgar�izations. Never before ii��his cammuiiity
have we seen such a diverse array af quality programming that can be utilized for infoiYnation
and ouheach by such a wide range of organizations and individuals. We look forward to fiesh
ideas wi�h�he desire to expand our effoits in the caming year.
Awards - 2012
In 2012, Cotnmunity-Minded Television received the Best of the Northwest Award for
O�erall Excellence in PEG Programming. Thanks to our community producers, volunteers, �
and staff, CMTV attained the highest honor bestawed on any community media channel in
Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana,NortheiYi Califoi7iia, Alaska,British Coluinbia and
Albe�ta. This is especially significant givei� our miniinal staffin�numbers comparative to o�l�er
community inedia channels in the region, and the lack of operational dollais conti7buted tluough
fi•anchise fees or grants from our reporting entities.
Capital Budget
The City of Spokane Valley contr•ibuted just over$12,000.00 in the last fiscal year toward
equipment for the new CMTV studio. This capitally restricted revenue went toward the piuchase
of lightiiig systems for the new studio and has been utilized by producers dozens of titnes since
the studio hit full aperation in]une of 2012. {See attached receipts for a camplete breakdown}.
The capital budget request for 2012-13 is an attached separate Appendix but for clarity, is
summai7zed as a fai7nal request for $36,788.00. Breakdowns and explanatians for•these requests
are attached separately.
1
. ti
����Community 25 W. Main Ave. ° 509-444-3381
.■ \�,
�p�� Minded SUIt@ 3�� � community-minded[v.org
■� • Television . sPokar,�, WA 9920 I ° cmtv@communiry-minded,org
COMMUNITY-MINDED TELEVISION
ANNUAL REPORT
October 1, 2011
Operational Budget:
The City of Spokane Valley did nat contribute any monies toward operational funds for the 2012
year. CMTV began offering a fee-for-seivice capacity for nonprofit organizations, seivice
agencies, and state agencies during the 2008 year; these services expanded tl�eir reacli tlu•ough
2012 and brouglit in $97,622.7b in production seivice contracts, Although this numbe�•held
steady in 2012 (fi•om ��01,�53.99), the lack of operational dollars from the City of Spokane
Valley has made it challenging to launch and implernent fu�l-scale continued outreach aiid
training efforts diu•ing 2012. Coiitinued operational resources are needed to launch full-scale
outreach effoi�ts to youth, veterans organizations, schools, faith-based groups and Valley
neighborhoods.
Through the majority of the year, CMTV operated with 2.5 �'TE for service tivork and increased
efforts to stabilize our core marketing and syiidication efforts for the programining we do
generate.New directions in our parent organization, and the appointment of Kathy Thamm as
our new Executive Director, have resulted in more concerted efforts and abilities in comrnunity .
production, inarketing and outreach.
. Profit and Loss Statemeut is attached as an appendix.
CHALLENGES �
Fiscal sustainability has always been a challenge for a nonprofit organization and CMTV is no
different. While we receive capitally restricted fundiiig fiom The City of Spokane Valley, this
money cannot be used to coiiduct trainings, inentoring, or outreacli. It can only be utilized for
equipment purchases aud maintenance of that equipment. In 2010, the City of Spokane Valley
contracted with Community-Miiided Tele�ision to record, edit, and broadcast their City Council
meetings on a weekly basis. This revenue was an important compoi�ent of the operational
funding we received that year and we respectfully request to be able to pro�ide this ser�ice
again. CMTV requests the opportuiiity to provide a comparable service to the City of Spokane
Valley at a coinpetitive price. While this will not sol�e all of our challenges, it will provide
CMTV the opportUnity to sevice the City of Spokane Valley with a �aluable asset, wlzile keeping
the re�enue wi�liin the region and push forward our efforts to conduct outreach into the city of
Spokane Valley, its groups, clubs, organizations and educational institutions that seivice youtl�,
se�iiors and �eterans. Through Valley Partners and the County Library system, both of whom we
have strong relationships with, ��e feel tive could connect ti�ith a wide variety of citizens wlio
could utilize our seivices and trainings
2
. �
�'Community 25 W. Main Ave. ° 569-444-3381
.■
�� Minded 5uite 3DD � communiry-mindedtv.org
i°��
� �°• Television 5pokane, WA 99241 � cmtv@communiry-minded.org
COMMUNITY-MINDED TELEVISION
ANNUAL REPORT
October 1, 2012
Outreach to/from the Public:
Tliroughout the 2012 year, CMTV has reaci�ed out to ti�e Spokane regions' community in diverse
ways that have benefited, grown and strengthened Spokane and neigi�boring communities. Our
most notable outreach effoi�ts have been:
• Tlze 50 Hor�r�Slar�r 2012-This years' S0 Hour Slam was as successful as t�e first year.
The workshop covered a broad range of topics and had over 30 atteiidees. Tlie contest
itself, w�icl� saw a reduced iiumber of films produced, saw a gr'eater collaboration among
the comrnunity to make larger teams and better films. This year the focus was tl�e
Natioiial Historic Society who is holding a conference in Spokane at the end of October.
Tl�ey are choosing one of the films made, to show at the conference, as each entry had to
include a historical site as one of its criteria. Collaboration with Broken Mic and GetLit!
This year meant a selection of spoken word poetiy was also a criteria for this yeais'
program. Another example of CMTV bringing toget�er and sl�owcasing disparate voices
in the community and bringing awareiiess to the �'eat talent and culture of the Inland
Northwest. Again, the fihns were aired on CMTV exclusively for t1�e inonth of June and
in Ju1y,began taking votes for favorites in a web based platform. T1�e announcements of
the year's �vinners are coming at the SPIFF{Spokane Intei�ational Film Festival}.
• Youtl� Or�tr�eaclr —This year,with the help of Comrnunity-Minded Television, the
Spokane Area Workforce Development Council provided a grant for training and
capacity building of the SAWDC local online presence tluough the InspireWA program.
A partnership which included 8 paid inteins�ip positions was developed that would help
local companies provide an inside look at their organization t��oug1� a video tour and
inteiviews with cui7•ent iiidividuals who work for that company. Individuals discuss tlie
path they took to the career they have and wl�at the best prospects are for training for that
particular job capacity, These facility walkthroughs and employee inteiviews will relieve
companies of the weekly facility walkthroughs that are a noi7nal pa�-t of high school
junior and senior h-ips and will lielp individuals wlio may be interested iii a career path
with that company or interested in a particular position with in that organization, assess
the developmental tools they will need to attain that position{schooling, work
experience, etc.}This project should expand to 10 businesses by the end of the year.
• Healtl�y Tee�as Project—CMTV created 6 PSA's {Public Seivice Announcemeiits) for
the Healthy Teens Project (a prnject of Community-Minded Enteiprises} with a Federal
CHIPRA Grant. The spots employed local youtli, actors, actresses and has received
statewide acclaim, resulting in hundreds of schools, doctors offices and health care
facilities showing the spots to encourage a more responsible approach to teenagers taking
respoiisibility for their own healthcare inanageinent. The state and federal govermnent
have outlined this as a priority in fostering responsible healtli decisions in young adults
and this project l�as resulted in a vibrant social change in the way teens view tl�eir health
ca�e respoiisibility.
3
. ���Communit 25 W. Main Ave. ° 549-444-3381
:■ '�°` y
p��� Minded Suite 300 � community-mindedtv.org
B�� Television Spokane, WA 99201 � cmt�@community-m9nded.org
COMMUNITY-MINDED TELEVISION
ANNUAL REPORT
October 1, 2012
Training:
Community video production trainfng began in 2007. We sta�-�ed wi�li tlu•ee introductory classes,
since it became apparent early that there was a need for basic digital �ideo training for
community members, including a separate certification process on using our more adva�iced
Sany HD ca�neras. We liave since focused more on mentoring and including pliysical
production with our inentees and tlie result has been more accomplished producers,prograins,
and interest fi•om students and teachers acrass the region. New equipment purchased this year
pro�ided for a new green screen production studio, lit witl� LED and fluorescent lights that
consume 40% less potiver than traditional lighting. We cui7entIy stock appraximately 26
terabytes of data for community producers and ha�e seen our project numbers escalate and the
di�ersity of the channeI continue to increase.
T1�e classes we currently affer a�•e:
• Ir7tr�odrrctiorz to Video Pr•oductrort—This class offers the student a chance to create a
completed �ideo project iii just a day and a half of instiuction. In this project-based class,
a student wi11 practice stoiyboarding/scripting, field�ideography, �ideo editing.
• HD Caniera Certifrcation—This class gives hands-on experience with a broadcast
quality camera and the oppoitunity to leaiYi advanced tools such as audia conri•ols, white
bala�ice, zebras, and much more. Cei-�ification is required for community producers who
wish to use the High Definition cameras.
• Final Cut P�•o I—With �liis professional editing saftware, students lear�the process of
digitizing, organization, layers ar�d the skills of being an editor.
� Firial Cut Pro 2- Studeiits familia�•witli the software aiid looking to mo�e totivard the
next level may take this class to examine working with multi-camera editing, �audio
s�veetening and adjustments, exporting using Compressor and final.ly bui�ning witli DVD
Studio Pra This will give a11 prajects a more professianal finished quality and produce
great looking deliverables for any client.
• Advarzced Video Pr•odrrctiorz —This class is for students wanting to di�e deeper into
production. Students wi11 lear�n ad�anced camera techniques, professional lighting and
professional audia setups, and lear�to work as a team on live shoots.
4
,v y •:°�'Community 25 W. Main Ave. ° so9-�aa-33ei
�� Minded SUlte 300 ' community-mindedtv.org
pe��
���� Television Spokane, WA 99201 ' cmtv@community-minded.org
COMMUNITY-MINDED TELEVISION
ANNUAL REPORT
October 1, 2012
Dur recent move to a lai•ger space-
In an effoi�to make creating a prograin easier for coimnunity produce�-s, CMTV inoved its
offices to an expanded section of the 3'�floor of the Saranac Bui�ding . The resulting studio
space (which still acts as a functional meeting space for the Saranac Tenants and the public),
provided an open area large enough to film a prog��am with room for cameras and lights. The
lack of this facility in years past has been a detriment(as iioted iii previous repoi-�s} and we are
actively encouraging community produceis to utilize the new facility and equipment for creating �
programming. �
Memi�erships- CMTV announced a meinbership drive at the beginning of summer that has
resulted in lower production fees for producers and geeater capacity to access resources. In an
effort to bring inore sustainable funding to the organization for the operational dollars required,
CMTV provides low cost memberships to community producers and organizations who utilize
equipinent on a consistent basis. This cost(effectively$30/month) offsets the time that is
required by eac� program to inentor producers as well as prepare the program for broadcast.
ComLUUnity Producers -In 2012, community producers submitted 365 hours of progr-amming,
CMTV relies heavily on its community producers and volunteers. Since our last annual report,
community producers have created or submitted 349 unique programs and 16 ongoing series to
CMTV for airing. Out of the cui7ent 604 programs that are playing on chaiinel 14, 72% of our
prngrainini�ig lineup is fi•oin com�nunityproducers. While this fgure is lower than last year
related to the percentage of new prqgramining, we have begun aii7ng more programming that has
a national appeal,promotes healthy discussion on current affairs, and is available to other
statioiis around the country,
Dui7ng 20I2, CMTV has beeri fortunate, with new producers stepping forward to create
programming fot Native Americans, the increasing population of our Slavic Coinmunity witli "
cablecasts in their iiative Russian, the gay and lesbian comrnunity, book re�iew pro�•ains
featui7ng local authors, pro�•ams about the ar�ts, veterans affairs and orgai�izations, cannabis
inedical uses and decriminalization as well as new talk shows t�at focus on uniquely Spokane
issues anc�organizatioris. One program,hosted by foi7ner Spokane City Council member Bob
Apple and Valley resident Victor Noder, c�iscusses a wide variety of groups, individuals and
interests. �
Iii 2012, we retained one work study and two interns, as well as met new volUnteers who
contributed a total of 980 hours of volunteer community seivice. These voluriteers have ,
coritributed all types and styles of tasks, from playing a key pai-�on video productions, editing !,
and filming their own projects, to assistiiig us with the cleanliness of the office. CMTV's ,
website and Facebook pages have provided outreach and feedback and have taken over where I
the CMTV Newsletter left off. This continues to provide us with more power to respond to '
producer requests and more input from our v�ewers. �I
�
5 I
p ��Community 25 W. Main Ave. ° 509-444-3381
Yp �
°:.•� Minded 5uite 300 � tammunity-mindedt�.org
���� Television 5pokane, WA 9920� ' cmt�@community-minded.org
COMMUNITY-MINDED TELEVISION
ANNUAL REPORT
October 1, 2412
CMTV Staff;
Robect Foote enjoyed his t�iird full year as Genet�al Manager of CMTV Robet�l�as
ir2corporated tl�e duties of engit�eer ana IT managet•to the incz'easing�y complex equipmet�t ana
coinputer resources that the station relies on to help producers create progcams. Daniel Reyes,
utzlizing skills as a producer, editor and camera operator, has taken control of classes and spends
a great deal of tiine working with commuuity producez•s, mentoring and assisting them with new
idea developineirt and creation. Da�iiel, in the face of new programs and pro}ects has retained a
full-tiine benefitted position tl�at wi�l allow hiin to devote more time and energy to editing and
producing,
Dashawn Bedford was added as a Progra�nmer in a part time benefitted capacity. The position
had been previously held by an workstudy but requires an concerted effort and attention to detail
tl�at a part time employee and full time student could not provide,. This l�as i•esulted in less
programming downtime issues and a greater va�7ety of progranuning airing on Channel l�.
Programming;
The shows currently airing on CMTV include an airay of viewer entertainment, infoi�natioii,
ri•aining and education.
Tl�is past year, CMTV produced
• Videos for the Empire Health Foundation on their Cooking for Ainerica Program that
sliowcased hainings of the Cheney School Dishict and District 81 luncl� teachers, who
utilize this training to reimagine their progeams using fresh foods prepa�•ed by the lunch
teachers for students. The video was very impactful aiid has been posted to the Cook for
America program's website and is being distributed by Empire Health Foundation to
other school districts in the region in an effo��t to have thein reassess their cui7ent lunch
programs in an effort to help coinbat growing child obesity rates in the region.
• Public Service Announcements for the Healthy Teens Project that encouraged teens to
take conh�ol of their own healthcare by educating them on tlie seivices available to thenm
through Washington State. These PSA's were very well received and disti7buted to
schools, doctors' offices and hospitals tlu•oughout Washington State for air in their
waiting rooms and counselors offices.
• Project Access contracted with CMTV to produce a thank you video for their program
foi7n patients to the doctars wlio worked with them tlu•ough the pcogram..
• The Better Spokane lnterviews Sei7es—locally produced programs tl�at discuss
enviroi�inental, media, and personal issues that develop better people and citizens.
• The Immaculate Hea�•t Reheat Center cantracted with us to produce a video about their
youth retreats and the long-ter�n iinpacts these retreats have on the youth and adults wl�o
attend them.
b
:e
�
�R'Community 25 W. Main Ave. ° 544-44A-3381
�� Minded SUIt� ��� � community-mindedtv.org
ee��
��� Television Spokane, WA 99201 � cmtv@community-minded,org
COMMUNITY-MINDED TELEVISION
ANNUAL REPORT
4ctober 1, 2012
• Tour Stop—A local interview show featuring national bands on touc tluough Spokane,
showcasing new music and offering glimpses of Spokane that showcase the city's vibrant
and diverse culhu•es. Through tlie PEG Media Network,TourStop has grown to 35
states, 50 markets and more than 10.8 million homes across the country.A 25% increase
aver the 2011 year.
Volunteeis produced pieces about the,political diversity, discriininatory issues and rights,Unity
in the Community, local fairs and celebrations in neighbaurhoods including Brown's Addition,
the Garland District as well as ValleyFest,poetry slains, documeiitary film and screen�vriting
ti�orkshops, sustainability efforts, new age religion, health matters and an ongoing series about
our local and regional movers and shakers with foi7ner Spokane City Councihnan Bob Apple and
local entrepreneur Victor Noder. Residents created weekly segments about localism, coaking,
organic faiYning and regional farmers markets. The Russian and Slavic papulation l�as also begun
braadcasting in their native tongue wikh khe�elp af CMTV's lights, cameras and editing
equipment,
CMTV broadcasts multiple public seivice aiuiouncements for iionprofits such as Spokane
Neighborhood Action Prog►�ain,Union Gospel Mission, flie Inland NorthWest Early Learning
Alliance, Spakane Child Abuse and Neglect Center, aiid also airs an ai�ay of public health spots
on subjecks such as how to get l�ealtl� insurance, protecting your family against the West Nile
Virus, the negative effects of drugs and child abuse, and information on recovery from addiction.
Please see the attached 2012 CMTV Programs docu�nei�t for a more complete list.
CMTV also increased its airing of live feeds from the FreeSpeech Tele�ision Network adding
Thom Hartmann and Al-Jazeera's netiiys fi•om their Washington D.C. Bureau in an effort ko I
provide alternative views to maiiis�ream news caverage and increase klie global perspective to
Spokane residenks. !
Marketing and Communications
The CMTV website www.commuiiitv-mindedtv.or�outlines aur missions and values to
community producers. Here we have posted class autlines and schedules as well as a sample of
our works in streaming video. 4uz•fee-for-seivice progra�n design costs and delive�'ables are
posted here and remain ainong the most competitive in the indusny, This year we are focusing
eneigies to make our web page more dynatnic and offer aownloaa of some of our more reqUestea
prograins.
7
. ���'Com m u n it� 25 W. Main Ave. ° 509-444-3381
:. `�:r_ Y
".°.�� Minded Suite 300 � community-mindedtv.org
���� Tele�ision Spokane, WA 99201 � cm[v@community-m3ndad.org
CMTV is now on Facebook as CMTV Spokane; this foiurn is working well for exchange of
infoiznation between producers and �olunteers and has helped provide feedback to many
prograins oii the air. CMTV has haci khis fully iunning since February of 2010.
COMMCJNYTY-MINDED TELEVISYON
ANNUAL REPQRT
Qctober 1, 2012
� PLANS FOR THE END OF 2012 AND THE COMING YEAR
New PragrAmrning:
CMTV programs cornpleted this past year or cuiY•ently in production include tl�ese subjects:
• The Better Spokane liiterviews Series—locaIly produced pr•ogeams kl�at discuss
en�ironinental, media, and personal issues tl�at de�elop better people and citizens.
• Tour Stop—A local interview show featuring national bands on tour through Spokaiie,
showcasing new music and offering glimpses of Spokane that showcase the city's vibrant
and di�erse cultures. This program is output through the PEG Media Netvvork and
reaches over 11 million l�omes nationwide.
CMTV Ser�vices:
CMTV offers video production seivices for nonprofits, seivice organizations and state agencies,
and recentIy we expanded our seivices in grapl�ic design, CMTV has seen community response
grow due to our ability to offer design sei�vices for brochures, flyers, posters, and web pages.
Dur lower-thau-typical industry rates assist inany nonprofits with their mar•keting budgets. It is
our Iiope to auginent patt of our operational costs by offering these services. �
New and Cantinuing Partnerships:
Coimnunity-Minded Enteiprises is au organizakion based on cominuniky collaboration and
paitnersliip, and CMTV is no exception. Tlu•ough tl�e past year, we ha�e pai�tnered wikh The
City of Spokane Valley to begin broadcasting their City Council Meetings and are working with
nuinerous groups to create more�ibrant local programming. We are aIso pursuing relationships
with other PEG stations to provide progra�nming about democracy building, and sustainable
neighborl�oods to our�iewers and ha�e e�en thrown in some entertair�nent on Friday and
I
;
�
Saturday nights witl� old bIack and white horror rno�ies fiom the 50's and 60's, as well as �
student fihnmaker works fiom local filrnmakers and students of Eastei�n Washington ZTni�ersity, �
Gonzaga, and Whit«orth LTniversities.
S
� l-'Com m u n ity 25 W. Main Ave. ° 509-444-3381
■A
�� I`linded Suite 300 � communiry-mindedtv.org
.�.
■
��ao
Television Spoka�e, WA 99201 ' cmtv@community-minded.org
COMMUNITY�MINDED TELEVISION
ANNUAL REPORT
October 1, 2012
CMTV Coordinating Committee:
In 2012, CMTV began addressing the presiding committee that oversees CMTV. The desire to
increase relevance among coinmittee members has resu�ted in successful outreach programs that
have seen aii increase in active committee ineinbers and resulted in more diversity from the
regional organizations, educational and religious institutions. Please see the attachinent for a full
list of our coordinating comiiiittee members.
Budget Praposals far the caming year:
As General Manager, I have ahvays tried to ensure purchases will be future proofed so that
inaterials purchased will not become redundant or inadequate to meet future expectations. Digital
television production is breaking exciting new ground in a wide variety of areas that are not
limited to cameras, computers, editing software, lighting or audio. The elements that create
programining are changing rapidly and we look to take advantage of eveiy possible shift that will
�uarantee a smooth experience for novice aud professional producers alike.
The CAP Act:
Currently H.R, 1746, (The Coirununity Access Preservation Act of 2011) sits in committee as a
co-spoiisored piece of legislation that would affect PEG Television nationwide. Tl�is bill goes a
long tivay to secui-ing and improving PEG stations and removes the capital restrictions fiom PEG
fees. CMTV supports this bill a�id is hopeful that the House of Representatives tivill pass it in the
coining inonths to stabilize iiot only CMTV but thousands of jobs in hundreds of PEG facilities
arouiid the country. CMTV is requesting a formal letter of support froni the Cit�� this ,year.
9
+ ��'Community 2S W. Main Ave. ° 509-444-3381
i�
e� Minded 5uite 300 � tommunity-mindedtv.org
.�.
!p�
��� Television Spokane, WA 9920f ° cmtv@community-min�e�.org
I
COMMUNITY-MINDED TELEVISION
ANNUAL REPORT
�ctober 1, 2012
ATTACHMENTSICOMPLIANCE STATEMENTS
• Financial �•epoit of c��annel operations and expenditures witii City of Spokane Valley
funding.
• Profit and Loss Stateinent for 2012
• Sainple weekly progeainming schedule.
• Next year's capital budget request for continued funding
• A list of flie CMTV Coordinating Committee members
• A cur�ent copy of CMTV's Rules and Re�ulations
• Cominunity Producers Program Submission Agreement Form
• CMTV Brochure
• PEG Funding Reiinbursement Ceitificate for 2012
• Statements of compliance for: '
o Signal quality and technical requiremeiits: "Community-Minded TV meets
ComcasYs reasoiiable video and audio signal quality/tech requi�ements. Audio is
broadcasting at a digital signal of-12db. White and black levels are within
broadcast range. There are no pending disputes rega�'ding the same."
o CMTV's Pro�•ain Proposal and Program Submission Agreement forms (see
attachments) stipulate that prograin producers assume legal responsibility for
programming content and copyrighted inaterial clearances. The City of Spokane
Valley and Coincast are indemnified fi•om any loss or liability resulting froin
programs running on Spokane cable channel 14.
10
:■
. ���:'_C0111111Llfllty 23 W. Main Ave. ° so9-a4a-33si
�r��� Minded Suite 300 � commanity-mindedtv.org
� ��'� Television Spokane, WA 99201 ' cmtv@community-minded,org
2012-2013 PROPOSED REVENUE E1(PENDITURES AND CAPITAL REQUEST
Community-Minded Television requests$38,788 for the fiscal year 2012-T3 for cosks associated with, upgrading the
RAID system(see attached quote), portable[ighting and battery power options for fighting systems(see attached
quote)and equipment repair and maintenance designated as 72.5%of the FTE salary to keep equipment functional
and ready to use for community producers.
CMN thanks the Val[ey Cffy Council and Valley staff for its continued support of the City's community media
channel.
B&H Photo - Video, znc. Page: 1
New Yor}c, NY 10 0 01
420 Ninth Avenue
Tel. No. (212) 444-6600
Fax. No. (212) 239-7770
I II� IIII II II�I�I��II II�I�III�II
0 Quote No. : 405531180
Date: 10/10/12
So1d To: Robert �'oote Ship To:
Community I�Sinded Television Community I�Sinded Television
25 W Main Ave Ste 310 1305 S. Napa St.
Attn: Robert Foote Attn: Jeff Anttila
SPOKANE, WA 99201 SPOICANE, WA 99202
�ill Phone: (509}209-2651 (360) 621--8290
********************
Cust Code: 36019727 Terms: Ship-Via: STANDARD
P.O. No. : Slsmari: PR ********************
-----------------------_______------------------------_�______----____-------------
Qty Brand Item Description Price Total
SKU#/Catalog#
-----------------------------��__------___�_�--------------------___�--—��_-----
12 zDX E7S ENDURA V-MT BATT.PK 71w w/PWR LzNK/REG 250.00 3, 000.00
#II3E7S/E7S
This Item I3as Free �hipping To The Continental USA.
1 FLOLIGHT LED-SATTKZT f/SONY NP/REG 79.95 79.95
#FLLEDBATTKZT/LEDSATTKIT
1 IDX 2-CI3ANNEL ENDURA CHRGR w/PWR �PPLY KIT/REG 415.00 415.00
�IDVL2J/VL2PLUS
CONSISTS OF:
1 zDX 2-CHANNEL ENDURA CHARGER/REG
#IDVL2/VL2PLUS
1 IDX 4-PIN TO 4-PIN CABLE (10 feet)/REG
#IDCA4XLR/CA4XLRB
3 FLOLIGI3T MICROBEAM 512 LED 5600K/V-MT - FLOOD/REG 598.95 1,796.85
#FLLED512VDF/LED512VDF
3 FLOLIGI3T MICROBEAM 1024 LED 5600K/V--MT - �POT/REG 893 .00 2, 679.00
#FLLED1024VDS/LED1024VDS
1 FLOLIGHT MCRS�I 128/DL 5600K �LOOD/SONY NP PLT/REG 259.00 259.00
#FLLED128SDR/LED128SDF
�� v��
���
�
�
�
�
L '
o �
� Page 1 of 2
�
B&H Pho�o - Video, Inc. Page: 2
Net,r York, NY 10001
420 Ninth Avenue
Tel. No. {212} 444-6600
Fax. No. (212) 239-7770 ,
Quo�e No. : 445531180
**x*****************
Cust Code: 36019727 Texms: Ship-Via: STANDARD
P.O, No. : Slsmari: PF ********************
---------------------------------------=-------------------------------____--------
Qty Brand. ��em Descxip�ion Price Tota�
SKU#/Ca�alog#�
@PLEASE NOTE: -------------_�--_--_---------�.���-------------��.._----------��-----
@ This quo�e �.s for information only. Prices, produc�s, and availabili,ty �
@ axe subject to change wi�hout no�a.ce. �
@ Certain i�ems may be enfoxced by vendox to sell at the '
@ vendor-imposed price po�ted a� the �ime of order,
Payment 'Type - Amount Sub-Total: 8,229.80
N/A
Shipping: 0.40
* Total: 8,229.84
�
�
�'
m Page 2 0!2
MAXX ENTERTAINMENT DIGITAL �11 1�T�
vi W
3]89 UNIT B R�D HILL AVE
C4STA MESA, CA 92626 Date QUOTE#
� io�3�zo�z t�sa
Name I Address Ship To
COMMiJ�IITY-Tvt1NDED TELEVISION COMMUNITY-A9INDED TELEVISION
ATTN:ACCOUNTS PAYABLE A`1"IN:ROBERT PODT�
25 1VE5T TvtAIN AVE„SUIT�436 25 ArEST MA1N AVE,,SU1TE 436
SPOK.ANE,1VA 99201 SPOKANE,A�A 99201
Terms Rep Project
COi�4PANY CHK 7G
ltem Description Qty Price Total
�V�6G-R16-�38'1`... MAXX T�1GI1'AL'S Evo 6G �XPANDO G Gblsec 1 i 1,995.00 11,995.00T
4$TB SATA 7200 RPM 64MEG CACH�,8026
EXPANDER 5A5(16)BAY RACKMOUN'1'1V1TH
Ri:VO-G80 PCI-e CONTROLLER CARD,SAS,AND
POIVER CABLES,2 X 8088/$0$$2 METER MINI SAS
CABLES.NOTC:PCI-e ONI,Y!POR P'1NALCUT
PRO,AVID-DVCPRO HD,DNX HD 220,PRO RES
422,PRORE5422(HQ},DPX.2k !rii�>>ri
rS I OGNIi1��KiT... MAXX DiGITAL 10 GIU 2d PORT ETHERPIET [ S,G95.00 S,b95.00T
S1�'ITCH�VITH]0 GIG STACKIT�TG PDRTS
452G,MAXX D1G1TAi,XrP A40D FOR 10 G1G
ETHERN�7'SIVITCH ,MAXX DIGITAL 10 GIG
�iF'P-S�Z tra�isceiver for lOGig s�vilch(this goes inio ihe
7�FPMOD)MA3�X DiCiITAL 3 METER SR CABLE
11'ITI� T�l'O LC CONNECTIDNS
i�7AXX DIGITAL I 0 G1G ETHERNET CARD NITI�
SFI'I'LU5 CONNEC'fOR,A7AXX DIGITAL ]0 GIG
SIZ'I'f2.At�I5C1EVEIZ,NEIV 1NSTALL RGA70TE Si;T
UP AND 1 YEAR SUPPORT
�V06G-3TB-SA... EVOGG 3TB MpDULE FOR EV06U 8 AND 1G BAY I 429.00 429.00'I'
6 iGI ONLY � .
Sales Tax (0.0%} �o.00
Phone# Fax#
7]4-374-�194�1 71�1-374-3404 Tota I S 1$,1I9.00
z:za P�n Communify-Minded Enterprises
09I26l12
Pro#it & Loss
September 2011 through Decemher 2012
Profit and Loss Slatements for the 2012 Fiscal Ye� Sep'11 -Sep 12
f ncome
4230•Ci1AN Restricted Revenaes 100,304.84
4300•Ci1AN Operating Revenue 97,622.76
Total Income 197,927.60
Expense
5000•Salaries and Wages 93,604.67
5020• Employee Beneflts 28,528.82
5040• Employee Parking 677.88
5080•Agent�isbursements 3,050.00
5120•Workshop Exp-Meals 130.27
5130• Re�islration Fees 27,00
5200• Postage 105.97
5220•Program Supplies 3,926.23
5221 •General Supplies Allocatlon 700,24
5260•Mlnor Equipmenk 25,292.94
5281 • Equipmenf Lease Allocatlon 1,590,19
5300• Equipment Repafrs R Malntenance 4,635.70
5340•�nsurance 1,774.43
5420• �ues 8�Subscriptlons 541.84
5440• RentlOccupancy 25,443.54
5460•Telephone Expense for Program 2,279.85
5461 • Telephone allocatlon for Ci1AE 1,000.58
5480•Internet Hosting for Program 3,178.18
5481 •Internet hosting alfocation CNfE 198.92
5500� Local-Tra�el 95.98
5510� Locaf-l4fileage 687.45
5520� Local-Meals 1,082.25
5600• Oat-of-Town-Trave[8�Lodging 76�.41
5620� Out-of-Town-Nfeais 304.51
5900 •Credil Card Fees 37.36
5901 •CNfN Capital Expenses 995.42
5920�Capitalized Equfpment 36�.37
5999• Indlrect Expenses 0.01
Total Expense 200,170.09
Net Income (2,242.49)
Page'I of'i
K?,>�a .�'+�!��r��'''' '�y/�s' y.rr5'`� li���� s -.�d��'�e'�,��::�a��w,7°C� '� ��.�r��'�.v r`;`�'.:-��,[�,.z,wklYZ=�",�y,�.,-�'��.,�.•�..,�s�1{=� rff 4y°,a7 ;{..��,r^��,- � r ��,� t s...fl�rtA_.;,ir-
,.4 _ .,.a�.r€?EY'��:s�� 4-,�� i y � s.., ,f s _ �����.�.�.�,.�x s r,y .,. � ���.�:'-d �' .. �� �r.;. ;,�'",Y'�f . � �:..''=J "? 'f'-.a� t S�`!� _. f���: �'��., � � .¢.''Y'-",1.,
I'��i� '"^'c� y�.:--�i.�,rc.s� �t:s�'e:. ; � -?�`5xs__ ,�,� �#,. ..k' �� �'�.���,;::��.� t°.-;';� z 1.�.� s��,���4 .�>_ ? T�I 4;`-;#,�±�5 �rr�,R�,c��'-wu�" _ �``�:*�Y,i f�'^'
'%�:��, ����s `3.,�k^.`F'��'� �s'S��..:y ,�' �.x- � y,�°'�,� ..:- ��„.� �..� .�.i-�, -� ` t<,�t?',r��5��� .,..d »:���[�'".�.'a e��, � '��� ��.!,1°�',7(r.r%� �q�"�' ��.•q �,,'
y.}:� �.� a��':�., .. �'�€�.']•r, ��Y�� -.i .�t`4'.�I°r �`y"'�T':�i�f_�"'^� 'il lq�'`��� .�2;°���-:� ��'� �;�,.is,� '�. ��"." `F�3Y3 1". .h � �y;r����
�'...�tl�; ��;��'�,.`����{.i"�.��� -?.r" a,. . ,�.,�. �a.�-;fEr ,.'?�4��,.� >�r .�a'-n�ahi; ,, y.s}.}a��`.�'F.e���� -.��'�..�• -s'-,";'� ��. 'l f:'
ti-~ �`� s Q � �.. i ], ���_��� ,� .e �.k. 4 r F�A� � :_�,..x, ��.`_
s�".���}ffi��\ ':'{ `'��n�.V �y��i°��j� 1' ��� ��t�' Y + '.�'� C�✓�zt�� 'F L���e���,���'�� �R-� ��,,,� ,,°:��`x ���� ,� �� �
���;,:� ` s .l"��„.. ,.,. � .�.,„�t' ��y-5.; �..,, �'� g�l`.<ti^' r 44''�'t ,.; ��'��. -�.�:-F�S-�.°.a �9" . ?`:s �'�L. �.;� �Y�� r . � �i�,;�"�'�'3�;rt
��.2.!i�.'C.' y�,��a ' u�. '� -::,f; , �ry'�i : �}'in�;. �3' i'��. ;:� r� �f� ..�� r� _ F � s..r� .��, ���{;�;J .�.�.p�. _, ���---.,�(::
� ,� I"°�•..r ,; � �� ��' �; � r. � f ����i� ��:�99�(�],�� � `��e> fi� �r� �,
'�;a�`��'�.��r��'���J-�'.Vl��QI'i,� q4 �;�i°{�>xqru., _�.� o�{S�.a' �n'�s!I����Y,�r�y.�;�ab)�'_"� �r�'�z ��:� tl 'y �.a.'d.;"Y �.i� 7�(��'f r ����t��j, � -7-,r-? �
�-"i E...:--. S ��.. -. ; , � �+ �l.� �,�-� '��._.�:�� .�,<rn�k�j{v g,� t�k � L C3;..t .t�3 � .4 �' , � �,. J� �{� �. .�
� f`5tr�n tli'enln cbrr3m��f# ih�at� hdi��talmedia f tl �,, 7 r � g� s �, fr a ; � ; '�. �t, ?�,� ,��-e�,, ,�.!
�. l� JY 1� ��'� � �.: T Y �, f � �._
�� $ Y g �8 t � %. � � , � f i�. ' ° rf �'' � � � �
,,'�� ti �. :, r � ' t 1 ._ �_ ��+��t f E i y` 4 '�1 i ' i ' f,. '�` �ft � f� .1..���,
i �, �` r,ii . . t .� '4 - . , i�"J s r r r j� ��1 1 � � , ,
. � . .� . � � , , , . �� i.
CMTV Rules and Regulations As Per�ains to
Programming and the Public
PROGRAM CONTENT
Overview:
Community-Minded TV wi11 reach out to and welcome the participation of a diverse
airay of cominunity members in its pingramming and in a wide�ariety of
volUnteerism opportunities. In so doing it will inaintain its focus on the quality and
the cominuuity-solutions rele�ance of its offerings.
Prohibitions And Clearances
The following material is prohibited:
1. Material which constitutes libel, slander, invasions of privacy or publicity rights,
or which might�iolate any other local, state or federal law.
2. Program inaterial that creates the iminediate danger of damage to propei�ty or
injuiy to persons; the substaiitial obstruction of law enforcement or other
governmental fi�nctions or services; the depri�ation of any person by du•eat, tlu•eat
of force or physical action of a�egal right or the disturbance of any person in the
enjoyinent of a legal right; or the creation of a public nuisance.
3. The direct or indirect presentation of lotteries or lotteiy information, except for
annouiicements pertaining to state sponsored lotteries.
4. Programs containing material that�iolates copyright or trademarks. [Use of such
material generally requires abtaining appropriate rights fiom music licensing
organizations, pUblishers, representatives, copyright holders, broadcast stations,
net��vorks and any other persons as may be necessary for cablecast. Producers lnay
be asked to fi�rnish written authorization for Use of such materials.]
CMTV shall exercise editorial control over program content, including that which is
required by law with regard to obsceiuty and illegal activity.
CMTV will schedule prograins it deems inappropriate for children in a timeslots of its
choosing,
Users of cominunity tele�ision chaniiels and prograin producers are fully responsible
for the coirteiit of all progra�n�naterial they produce andlor submit.
, �, r p -� .r ,r ' � ��-,a„,��
` �" :�;' ' � �- �` " �.'� r- _ �� -� ,�.w
.
��, � „_, ,�'� .,�"' � 5�����g �k� ��� - � _ �?a -
.
f���lx�� �7������ � � � � �� ; � r
��, ,� ,r ;�- �,
Credits,Disclaimers and La�eling of Sensitive Materiai
CMTV reseives the right to include the fallowing notice(ar some similar notice}
befare and/ar after a program:
"The views expressed on the following�{or preceding}pragram are those af the
individual producer and do not necessarily reflect those of Camrnunity-Minded TV.
CMTV is not respansible for the production or quality of the program being
cablecast."
We also reseive the right ta include a phrase, such as:
"The preceding prograin was made possible through the cornmunity television
facilities of CMTV."
If CMTV or the access producer makes a gaad faith determination that the subject
material in a program inay offend soine viewers and/ar may not be appropriate for
. children, CMTV may require that the following announceinent be added ta the
beginning of tlie prograin:
"The follawing progr�n may contain sensitive material. Viewer discretion is
ad�ised."
CHANNEL SCHEDULING
Application for channel tiine on the CMTV is open to cammunity members subject to
quality criteria, arena participatiori, and CMTV prograinming priorities. Pragrams
will be accepted or rejected on a"viewpaint neutral"basis.
PROGRAM SUBMISSION GUIDELINES
1. CMTV accepts all programs that are created in Spokane and within the
sUi7•aUnding areas* of Spokane County tliat fit within the CMTV Programming �
Guidelines.
"Surrounding areas include in�tv a 100 mile radius vf the County of Spokanc
2. CMTV will accept programining froin outside of its iminediate slu�rounding areas
bUt still within Washington State, if the pragrainming has direct local impact� on ;
the Spakane Cammunity ar is programining that directly supports CMTV's
inission and is not programining that is cuirently being aired on channel 1�,
�'Dires:t Local Lupact meai�s infonnation,action,chvices or concems that will inffuenee tlic Spokanc
Communiry.
3. All other programming" will be considered for airing on Channel 14 on an
individual basis. Programs that are selected for airing will support the ongoing
mission of CMTV and the ideals of community sustainability.
�`This may bc programs tliat are nationally sponsared ar out of stale
4. All programming tliat is not produced within Spokane's suri'ounding areas will
also have to be sponsored by a local producer and contain a Local Wrapping."
*Local Wr,�pping is an iu�roduction to tlie program cn�ted by tlic sponsor of why tl�is progr�m is being shown
to tlic 5pokane audieiice
5. Locally produced programs will take precedence over any other programining,
and all progcamming is subject to lose its time slot at flie full discretion of CMTV.
PROGRAMMING GUIDELINE�
1) Progeams submitted to CMTV may not contain:
a. Co�runercial advertising or any promotional material conceining products
or setvices presented for the pwpose of any solicitation of money or other .
things of value, unless specifically exempted under the ter�ns of this
agreement.
b. Cominents aimed at disparaging one gcoup of people in a way that might
encourage hate or vialence.
c. A lottery, or any advertiseinent or information conceining any lottery.
d. Any mater�al that constitutes libel, slander, invasion of privacy or
publicity rights, unfair coinpetition, violation of trademark rights or
copyright, or which may violate local, state or federal law.
e. Obscene or sexually explicit material
£ Matei7al that violates rights of ownership
g. �alse or misleading statements made in a Progeain Submission are grounds
for rejection of program.
2) All approvals, clearances, releases, licenses, etc. for the use of all program
material to be cablecast or webcast including but not liinited to approvals by
broadcast stations, net�vorks, underwriters, music licensing organizations, pi7nt or
visual copyright owners,publishers, perfoimers' representatives, all persons
appearing in or refei7�ed to in the program material, and any other approval s that
may be necessary to transmit the prograin matei7al, will be provided by the
producer upon request.
3) Comrnunity-Minded Television is not a public foruin, and all programs submitted
will be viewed on a "viewpoint neutral"basis.
4) Any program that does not follow the Pt•ograin Guidelines and the Prograin
Submission Guidelines will be rejected from airing.
PROGRAM,SUBMI,S,SION PROCEDURES
Program producer or sponsor must fill-out and sign the CMTV Application and
Program Submission form.
Before a program is cablecast, the DVD r�ust be cIearly labeled
with the following infoi�rnation;
1. Title of program
2. Producer's naine and pl�one number
3. Length of program
TECHNICAL ,STANDARDS
All programs submitted for the channel are required to rneet minimum technical
standaz•ds for cablecast. Audio and video signal must be stable and of a quality as to
permit playback and viewing without distortion and must be in compliance witl� FCC
regulations. CMTV reserves the right to deny broadcast if these minimum technical
standards are not met.
The following are exarnples of unacceptab�e technical conditions:
1. Loss of control h•ack (glitches)
2. Incoi7•ect color balance
3. White levels that exceed IOQ ire or black levels ti�at drop below 7.5 ire
4. Audio si�nals that are inaudible or distorted
All submissions subr�itted for cablecast must be coinpatible witi�the
foi�nat being utilized by the CMTV broadcast facility.
GRANTS, UNDERWRITING AND SPONSORSHIP
Unde��writiug
CMTV will seek and accept fnnding and seivices in support of its programming in
line with its mission and progranuning priorities. It will i�ot accept fnnds or services
to prioritize pro�amming outside of its programmingpi7oi7ties. It will not use
underwriting as a�eliicle for publicizing ar advertising specific fi.inders or service
providers, It will acknowledge funders and/or suppoi�ters in siinple oii-screen or web
115t5,
CMTV must be notified, at the time program proposal is submitted,that a program
�vill be undei�written. Failure to i�otify may result iii a delay ar cancellation of the
cablecast.
Any individual or �•oup submittiiig a proposal for grant fnnding for a project
involving use of the coimnunity access facilities or equipment inust obtaiii
prior written appro�al froin CMTV,
Personal Profit and Commea•cial Use
Producers may not use aiiy part of the program for personal profit or gain, Producers
found to be using the facilities oc equ�pinent for personal profit or gain will be subject
to loss of privileges. Federal law and FCC policies prohibit commercial use of
community access chaniiels.
RIGHT� AND RE�PONSIBILIT�ES OF CMTV �
Waivers
CMTV reseives t�ie right to unilaterally tivaive or modify any self-imposed
regulation when that waiver or modification is judged by CMTV to be in t�e public
interest or necessaiy for the efficient operatioii and management of t�e public access
system.
Violations
Any community producer found in violation of CMTV's rules, regulations and
operating procedures may be denied future use of CMTV equipment and facility.
Maintena�ice
CMTV tivill maintain all equipment in good tivorking order, Equip�nent that
e�periences technical failure will be promptly repaared. If the equip�nent can no
longer be repaired, replacements will be purchased. �
Public Iuspection
CMTV will maintain a file of all access requests, for bot�i equipment and playback.
The file shall include the naine and address of the individual�naking request. The file
will be available for inspection during noi7nal business hours.
Misuse of Access Facilit,y
CMTV's training workshops, facilities and equipment a�•e intended solely for the
e�pression of the vietivs and ideas of those members of the community who have
completed the CMTV training progia�n and have been certified in the use of the �
facilities a�id equip�nent, under the rules, regulations and procedures outlined herein, �
Workshops, facilities, and equipinent may not be usec�for cominercial ventures of any '
kind. Furthei7nore, it should be understood that the use of access equipment and ;
facilities is for not-for-profit puiposes only. Violators tivill face loss of all future �
access privileges and may be charged published rates fot co�nmercial leased access i
use. i
Represeixtation
Access producers are not to identify themselves as an employee or representative of
CMTV at any time. Anyone misrepresenting their affiliation with CMTV will cause
the irnrnediate termination of their access privileges.
Right of Refusal
CMTV reserves the i7ght to refuse the use of equipment or facilities to any person
who appears to be under the influence of diugs or alcohol or otherwise appears not to
be in full control of their faculties. CMTV reserves the right of refusal to any person
not complying with the iules and procedures set foi�h in this docwnent.
Copyright, Trademariz and Name& Likeness
Access producers must obtain, in writing, and produce upon request, all
necessary approvals, clearances, and licenses for the use of any inaterial submitted for
cablecast.
TRAINING
O�ervietiv
CMTV will utilize its Programming Department staff to insti�ct �pokane area
residents in te�evision pi•oduction techniques in a comprehensi�e television
production workshop. The workshop will include a w�•itten manual, detailed lectures
and hands-on training. Those under 18 years of age must have the peiYnission of a
parent or guardian before participating in the workshop. Certification is based on
proven proficiency with all production equipment. Upon cei�tification, community
producers are entitled to reseive studio time for the puipose of producing community
� access programs only. There is a great deal of matei-ial presented
Certi�ication
Certification entitles the participant to use certain public access facilities and
equipment. In order to remain certified, producers must log six hours of activity per
twelve-inonth period beginning with the date of certification. Pai�icipants may be
required, at the discretion of CMTV, to re-certify if the above requirement is not rnet.
In lieu of tlie warkshop, a pi•ofciency exam is available fo�•those with pi'evious
knowledge of or experience in television production. All participants are required to
sign a Producei's Agreement. This document certifies that the producer has read,
understands and will abide by the operating rules and regulations and agrees to be
solely responsible for the content of any programs produced or scheduled for
cablecast.
Additional Training
Any producer who would like additional training or a refiesher on any of the
equipinent may contact an access techiiician to airange for additional training,
USE OF FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT
Overview
To encourage the use of channel 14, CMTV will provide programming facilities,
equipment aiid staff. Although CMTV is not a public forum or intended to be an
"open mike" CMTV's facilities a�•e available on a viewpoint neutral basis. All
interested pai�ies are fiee to make application and must adhere to the policies and
procedures set forth herein.
Eligibility
Individuals who have successfully completed the CMTV training
course may apply to use CMTV facilities and equipinent.
Minors must have wi7tten permission fiom a parent or guardian to use
facilities. A pa�•ent or guardian must sign a documerit: 1} accepting
responsibility for damage or other liability arising out of or relating to
minor's use of pcoduction equipment or facilities, and 2) consenting to
and authorizing the appearaiice of a�iy minors on a cablecast program.
CMTV staff reseives the right to request proof of residency at any
time. Individuals or organizations fiom outside the community may use
equipment or facilities only with special permission fiom CMTV.
RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR EQUIPMENT AND FACILITY
Overvie�v
CMTV reseives the right to detei7nine whether proposed use of equipment and
facility is appropriate.
Reserving Studio Time and Equipineut
To ensure that no producer or group monopolizes the facilities, and to ensure that
equipineilt is beiiig used to complete a program ready for cablecast on the charuiel,
scheduling guidelines must be obseived. CMTV tivill be flexible in scheduling
procedures whenever possible to aid in successful completion of a program.
In order to secure studio time, CMTV reseives the i7ght to request the following:
1. A program outline or script
2. A list of cei�ified community producers who will seive as crew
3, Production plans as they relate to the operation of the studio. Reseivations for
studio production facilities may be made for up to 4 hours of time pex•session,
with a maximum of 8 hours per week. Or otherwise determined by staff,
Scheduled time includes the time needed to set-up and break down the set.
Reseivations may be inade for the following putposes:
1. To prepare sets, lights, and sceneiy
2, To rehearse and prepare material before the cameras
3. To record a program or program material
Access producers may schedule up to 16 hours of facility time in any month to
complete a single project. Additional time will be pei7nitted on a space-available
basis. The st�.idio will be available to only one g�•oup at a tiine. Due to space
limitations and security conceins, only those individuals directly involved in the
production a�•e allowed in the facility, Al1 posted rules for studio use must be
obseived, Cancellations of scheduled equipinent and facilities must be made 48 hours �
in advance. Repeated failure to do so may result in loss of access privileges.
Scl�eduled studio productions will be canceled if the production crew does not an•ive
within 30 minutes after the start of the scheduled facility time,
Producers Responsibilities .
Access producers must ai77ve on time for scheduled studio productions and must have
the studio and control room equipinent and sets put away before the end of the
scheduled time period—it is generally good practice to allow at least one hour before,
and one hour after the actual taping. This will provide ainple time to set up the studio,
brief the crew and talent on the planned production, and clean up after the taping. ,
It is the responsibility of the community producer to fill crew positions fiom among
the pool of certified coimnunity producers. CMTV staff should not be considered to
fill crew positions.
Access producers are expected to be prompt; ai7iviiig inore than 30 minutes late for a
scheduled appointment on more tl�an one occasion may result in the loss of access
privileges. The access center operates on a schedule to tiy to meet the needs of all
� access volunteers. Access p�•oducers who are"late" or"no-shows"have taken that
scheduled time from another produce�•. If a produce�•is more than 30 minutes late,
CMTV cannot guarantee equipment and/or facilities will be available for use,
Access producers must follow appropi�ate procedures for handling and operating
equipment and facilities, and assutne full responsibility for loss or damage due to
negligence or abuse during tl�eir scheduled and assigned time, Access producers
found to be misusing or abusing equipment may be asked to repeat training and may
be sub�ect to loss of privileges. Access producers may iiot change wiring, patch bays
or components on any equipment in the studio and editing facilities widiout staff
pex�nission or supervision. No attempt should be�nade to repair equipment Producers
who attempt to do so will be charged repair costs for any damage caused in such an
attempt and will lose their access pi�i�+ileges, Access producers should promptly report
any defects or probleins to CMTV staf£
Additional materia�s for productioiis beyond those supplied by CMTV (i.e., sets,
graphics, videotapes, other materials, etc.), must be su��lie�by tne producei•and
must be reinoved from the facility after the production.
Food,beverages and smoking are NOT alla�ved in the control room, editing suites or
studio area at any tiine. Additianally, CMTV facilities are non-smokiiig facilities.
Smaking is not peimitted indoars at any CMTV facilzty.
Anyone found to be under the influence of alcohol or drugs, or cai�rying a weapon of
any kind, will be removed from the premises and will have their access privileges
tei�ninated.
Inapprop�iate bel�avior b}�access volunteers will not be tolerated. Inappropriate
behavior includes,but is not limited to: yelling, using profanity, abusing equipinent
and physically or verbally abusing another individual. Engaging in inappropriate
behavior may result in termination af access privileges.
Telephones and otlier office equipment are for the use of CMTV staff only and may
not be used without pei7nission fiom CMTV staff.
Facilities and eyuipinent cannot be used for personal prafit or remuneration. Funding
may be sought only with consultation of CMTV staff aud iu accardance with the
sponsorslup guidelines outlined in tlus document.
Access privileges will be rescinded for uoncompliance with,any operating iules and
procedures outlined in this docuinent or for any action that is deemed det�-iinental to
CMTV.
Access P�•oducers Privileges
Access producers are afforded the following privileges:
• Owne�•ship rights to all original material.
• A minimum of one cablecast timeslot, in accordance with scheduling priorities.
• The ability to request that progi•am master videotapes held by CMTV be
discontinued from cablecast or erased.
Portable Equipment Rules And Regulatious
CMTV requires a show for cablecast for use of CMTV equipment.
Poi-�able equipment may be checked-out for 24 hours periods duriiig the week and 72
hours periods over a weekend. Requests for longer periads must be made at the time
the reseivation is made and�vil] be lionored at discretion of the staff.
Oiily one�veekend checkout will be peimitted per month, or otherwise peimitted by
staff, Equipment not retuined by the t•eturn date and time specified on the portable
equipinent checkout foiTn may result in loss of access privileges. Pai�able equipment
may be checked out up to four times before it is required to submit a show.
Access producers may not checkout more than one portable unit at a time.
Producers must test portable equipment at the time of checkout before lea�ing the
building. Any problems with the equipment inust be reported to CMTV staff.
Access producers assume full responsibility for loss or da�nage to equipment while in
their possession. Equipmeiit may not be taken outside of CMTV's seivice a�'ea
without express peiYnission from CMTV, Where special circumstances exist, and with
staff approval, equipment may be taken outside of the CMTV sei�vice area for the
purpose of gathering footage for the production of an access program.
Production equipment must not travel more than SO iniles of CMTV headquat�ters,
unless pei7nission is gi�en by CMTV staff.
Ynfractions And Disciplinary Action .
Infractions of the Rules and Regulatioiis�vill be dealt�vith on a case-by-case
basis.
I
�
�•Y�n> .�'1 ,`:°"~" ��,.��"f5., �.�r,l,�� �j s-.r,� j -£a�3d�,i�:�l�.� i �_ai"T' .' t�.:°.:fr�k �.,t�Y"?� 7i,. :f ...,�Y Sr�:i`:'=:.�"`y �'e " ts3 {_'".=. �.�e' �' �rl.�, �lfr.�'`::�'�
� .x 7 a��e��fy�..'��: s r .� .. Y.�. �l�� �.�y k .z'"�-k ^'s�9�.;�j'�:� +.T #C���� �:� �...�:- `^��� +'.'�.�+, �� /�'�jxj �',+j'Ci�' ;�.r���� s�`�I T�-7�'��g�.
��u�tc�3 )A4�.:Y' �4�. 3.:\ c � i a._ � ..r- x yk a"t 3�� �`.�s a'����-�.� �q"i�" `��r ' a�/ ,.�Y' �'�,;1��',:�i e o -.c:� i'
.i �� �. �y : .y-- •t i5 .��.:r�v��- ` Y �'� n�:��Y i �.7�. .. u!� �v,�� �,i�: 5 ��..�� ��yy! rJ:�;" ��.z ��� f..>�
- �?`s����i�r�y�.✓ r r��� � �-�� ri"�r .-" �,�°� C.;e�3 �g�s�";�i�k` f"c�,� ��� �,y �.i , �,,5`'o[�»�.%<F�� �� 1 a f � f'y,� :�� T<r;�, ,�`'r;,'.r
A �'�, d
F�{g. ._;<;`� ,3 -�� � ;� � . .?�; {^+, ��"C�"� .i,.?a' �LY�"��jV �'f/' "" � � " �� x � '�,�'� x��rA.._
.(� p� _� r "� �,i 'q�_ � r.�t�ai��s���F1,��,,��,�rYC�� ��y� �(� .� �� �''r ��.-�=c,.� rJ�
.:?�. -�T4r�����l l,l�y- � � �__r���� lr,e�o dt-,t p ,�SS".-.y:Y��4'� 3r;: � r,.;a -z,.I a�,����� e��}���', .a�s � .:-C�� ��,EAf � .�£���
�
�- -?� d`i t g � � r� -5 .��; �. s '�,y�z�.t �1�1'a):.� c�� e �'�r�p "� �?arYY��". ��� ��O h'"�
• �3 �;"� 7�}�► �y sV i+ t r � l��i;° s � '�� � :� J.S�. ��,�� 3 -F� 't , � �g�x..e.q
�� \ _ �lf�k�L"��l }�, :�1-� - � 4'wf, _S .f a �� �fi.z"�- 5��� � ^^�' r'. .r".rj.�':..�{ s._.-Wi �!:" ,/�- t ;""`Y��'N��. �r'� ,✓"_
� � a' !t., 1., y; a-_., t . Y s' ,. 5�8 ti r .!�' : e i"�! � ,�r f�r,� 9p /�E� k 5a"`7.��s��.. <��4 �T ��,.'z}�'�?:FF' � u�
I'f� � �' � �{I `y C n, -�./'lr. -9.�Y..? � ?."� +7'� � '��� f� ��� � .7� Y (as`"F4^,� �� ;,� 9��i'`i f l � �/ i�`^S �-s, %
i�.'_�,� �-�� �Cl�r��3��il+_�S: r . � � z���,T,� '�l r ,�. �Y' �.-r � �C�. Fl£'�� t y� t !,:�'ti�.@� ,r `�.c�.. ''P�;':+�� ��6� �°�']' �;��h. �y^F�_
_�,4��' � �. }��Fk,�«4 =� z �5-r ;''�„�=`.�.'�`Ji,. ; r}} -f [,a r "� s ;�> f��t r ,f - 'S&F���� ���l�r!'�''-�c `�
�r�f�gtl��r��ng'eommunitythroug'h�liprta�medsa'i ��: �'{ � �s� �;s � �� � ,- s, . �i: �5' �ti1f � � �� : j � �,,,, � � -t� �f
1 � y S � � s i y 1, � Y �� x � .5� % � r
-.>. , ` . i t: � =�
� �r � , ' , ` l � � , ,�� ;1 �r,:_
SPOKAIVE VALLEY PEG DOLLAR DlSTRiBUTION
CMN purchased lights for their new studio operation with the City of 5pokane Valley's PEG contribution
this year.The enclosed receipts show$7.2,304.84 was spent in acquiring a series of LED and fiuore5cent
lighting that made f3lming in our studio possible, We thank you for this contribution.
(111 (N"
p�l�ar�e
�alley�^
11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 1b6 0 Spokane Vakley WA 992b6
509.92i.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1(Hl8 0 city�all�spokanevalley.org
Public, Educafion, and Gavernmental (PEG) I`unding Reimbursement CertificAi�on
I certify that the reimbursement request dated _8/8/12 in the arriount of 123Q4.84 is for
qualifying capital expenditures utilized for the provisian of PEG broadcasting services to the
City of Spokane Valley and that PEG cantributions fr•orn other jurisdictions have not been
utilized to pay for the iterns contained within the request.
�
�
�.....
�
� -�---
�
General Manager CMTV
Signature Title
CommunitX-Minded Television 8/8/12
Coinpany/Agency Date
i
4
I
I
�
I
f
I
I
I
� 42A N�ntH Avenue, New Y�rk, Nlf 10A01 � Fax: 212.239.7770
p � ' ` i-�i2 444-b600 � • �� i-7i2 444m6700 � � ' 1-212 444-5000 ��� � i-2i2 444�5070
° ' 1-800 447-995Q 1-8Q0 947 9978 � 1-8Q0 447-4410 �3� 1-800 947-1183
� , � ' { ��� ' ' � Ta It� uire Abaut Your Order Te1: 212.239.7765 - �QQ.221.57'43 • fex:212.502.9�426 - 866.52�.737a
DzeProfessioriRI'sSource -_-, -- V1/'WW.Qieli���.COC�'1 �' -- ,
y �� �� Order �o.. 39033�1�;r7()
I I I�II �II II II I�� I� II�II�I �a;
Suld "i'o: It013I:RT FOOTE
COA�I�\-IU\'TTY\IL\DT�U'1'�LI;V'ISTO\�
2S «' I�lAI\A�'3's 5'1'I:3I0 � �
SPOICA\I;, LYA 99201 ��� �,
. �� �
;.t� c°
33i11 f'hunc: (509)2Q9-2G5[
I�n�ofce i)a!e CtESfoE�ier Code 'i'e��ms Order llate Yurchase Order i\umher 5alespe�•sofi Sh��� 1`i�i
Q6/0�i112 36019727 06/04/12 26G �-,��^�- �C;1'S ;rRQU\ll
�
s x s � r - �- : ,� �� s z �
'' �c�� �,�'�,� ���-
� 1 KINO-FLO GAFFER 4'la-BNK S�LNE 2-LT KIT (1 � KIGSK2U 2<i�3(1•U(I L.h311•l�[1
- Salesperson Code: 266 � �
"� - — ---- .,._--. , -�
2 � 2 KINO-FLO �}'1[]DUBLE-BANK SELECTIV�5Y5TEM f1 K14DSK ��99•9� �••�����`�«
� 5alespr.rsun Code�266 ��-`� � �- I
SF�iIAL F�:2273 2266 ��.���
i
- - 4;
�1 �� 1 FLdLIGiiT MB 2-512/1-�28 DL-SPOTISTAN[]SIS1uHC FLIVfB251DSWCK I ��-�9.Oli i 1,��-19.Ui1
! �� Salesperson Codc: 266 I
�
2 5� ;��� 1� 2 FLdLIGHT MB 2-1D2411-512 DL-FLDIVMISTNDSISS FLM.B2I�DFVSK ?.�_��°�.�1�) ` �.���`�•{S��
_�_Salesperson Codc: 266 _� __ ._------- -------- . -�
�3 3 KINO-FLd 4'lT12 SOOMA KFS� DAYLT LAMP COAT! KILKF554C6 l.�9.�0 -�I�.�IS
Selesperson Code: 266 5�!�✓'� 17�� , -
Iv ����
6 6 AUENG�R C'lddD CE1LfNG SCfSSOR CLAMP �
� flUC10DD 7.U�6 �6_'_'_�
Salesparson Code: 266
2 2 AVENGER C210 BABY PIPE CLAMP AVC210 =G�•��{) S?•S��
I
Salespnrson Coder 26fi
PLEASE NOTE: -----------__------------------------------------------
I
Q&H Wi!!be OP�N ora Independence Da y, .
- - ' ---- -
Contitztced or2 1Vext Page ... �
z�
m C�stomer Copy i'�iyc I ��i -
420 Ninth Aver�ue, IVew Yorle, NY �000� • Fa�c: �12.239.7�70
p � ' ' 1-717 444�bb00 � � �� 1�212 444-67dd ' ' 1-Z12 444°5000 ��� • 1-214 444-5d7d
� �� 1-800 447-9450 • 1-800 947 9978 0 1-80d 947-4410 ��� 1-800 447-1183
� � � '� ` � ��� ' ' ' T� In uire Ahavt Yaur Order Te1: 212.239.77G5 � �00.221.57�43 • Fax: 2�2.SQ2.9r�2G - 866.527.7375
7JTe Professional's Source - �.:-- \/i/V1��l1Io�rC11'1C��"f.CO1'9'1 � - _
Orc�cr �o.: 39()33��c�60
� � � �I I III �I II II� I� ��� l � � l
5qld'1'0: R013ER1'I<00'fIs
CO\�i\-IL'V'ITl'\�ff\'1]i+,D'I`IsLI'sVISIO\`
Zs" ii`\-ItiI\'riYi: 5'i'Ia;3IQ
51'OICA\'L+', WA 99201
liill Phnn�: (509)209-2b5[
Tuti�osce !)a!e Ci�stomer Code `I'ern3s Orcler I3ate Purchase Os•der Nnmber Salesperso�i 51¢i�� 1�i.t
OGID4112 36019727 0G10�112 266 UY5 C,EtC?[:\I� �
g a s � > - g_ � :
�t}.
1
Backorder To Follow {
i
I
,
ll
i
I
i
I
�
I
I
i
�
_ _1.. . _
, ,. , s��t�-'r�t:,i: ti i t,��}i.a-i
�3�;usonni.ico�rYn�T� cx}.c� iz,�o�.s�
Sliippiu;�� ,�.incilin�;: S.�ti3.a(]
'['ot.il Ordcr. 41?.,3f1-I.h;'
s "I'ut::I Paynt�i�t: 5'13,1f1a.N-!:
_ 13filat�cc: �.ltfl�
�, Customcr Gopy P��9� -' �'_ '
Cammunity-Mlnded Enterprlses 1����
B & H Phota 513 012 0 1 2
�ate Type Reference Original Amt. Balance �ue piscount Payment
5130120'12 Bil! #389372174 �2,304.84 12,304.84 '12,344.84
Check Amaunt 12,304.84
Banner Bank-Operati #389372170 12,304.84
r������� �� � �� � �I ���
6'15917(a!1�, 006141 Rev 3r11
j
I
�
Communiiy-Mlnded �nterprises 14���
B 8� H Phofo 5130120�2
Date Type Reference Original Amt. Balance Due Discount Payment
5/30/2012 Bill #389372470 �2,304,84 12,304.84 12,304.84
Check Amounf 12,304.84
Banner Bank-Operati #389372�70 12,304.84
MIMIlIII II I II I II III
si,s,z{ersi7 aas,ai �PVs�,t
Schedule for Community-Minded TV
Stmday,9I�12012
12;00 AM Cannab[s Common Sense A talk show 1:00
focasing on cannabis and current laws
1:00 AM Cannebts Common Sense A talk show 1;00
focusing on cannabis and current taws
2:00 AM Ga1he[irtig on thg Sa�Ed Mountaln The 0:53
Planet,Upcoming Earlh Changas and
the Effect of Gving In rlght relalionships
toclay and bayond 2012 wfll have upon
Earlh Changes.
2:53 AM A11ist 3hoVK�se CMN Presents locai i:Q5
art and music �
3:58 AM Artlat Showa�,ase CMN Presants locaf 1:01
art and music
4:59 AM Artlst Showcase CMN Presents local 1:01
art and music
6:00 AM Artlst SF1o�wicaae CMN Presents local 1;Ufl
art and mustc
7:00 AM Mist ShowGaBe CMN Presents local 1:00 I
art and music �
B:oO AM Living by Felih Blble teachings about 0:25
faith by Pastor Otis Manning.
8:29 AM Lsu�dlFed LlYe pf8se�lted by 0:30
LaunchFed INW Weakly 7alk show
with intervtaws of local business people
ancf companies In key industry sectors.
Miss9on Is to shlna a light on Spokane
businesses an
8:59 AM EveCgreeil CoopB�tfvB A look at Ihe i;a4
Evergreen cooperative experiment in
Ohio.
10:03 AM Donkgy D�Ife Biblical advenl�res with 0:30
OI[fe and his friends
10:33 AM QuietllrneTsles Children Stories and 0;27
Greaf Iliuslralions Read Aloud.
t 1:D0 AM Sp03�ne Book Report A showcase ot 1:U0
local authors and thelr works
t2:D0 PM C�&dloliC M�sse Weekly Calhollc Mass 1;U0
from lhe Immaculate Heari Retreak
Center.Alrs each Sunday a[12pm and
5pm
1;00 PM LJVIng by Felih Bible�eachtngs about 0:3fl
faith by Pastor Otis Manning.
1;30 PM fJfesiyles For Baitar ways of LFring 0:3fl
Generated 1 0/1/201 2 4:1 Q:3Q PM Page: 1
Schedule for Community-Minded TV .
2:00 PM fVort�SW6st Ir�dlan NeYVS Thls monthly 0:30
series tells slories from Iribes acrass
ttte Norihwest.�eaturing lraditional
Indian celebraiions and much more.
2:30 PM Betfe�Spokane f�share Wal&ing Wilh Q:30
- Jim Siollz-
3:00 PM BBtfe�SpolcBfle Interviews focuskng on d:33
improvir�g life En Spo[cane
3:33 PM CMTV is 14 A loo&ak CMTV and I[s 0:27
mission
4;00 pM The Garage Shaw S�mple garage 0:30
proJects that don't require complicated
equiprnent are crsated.
4:30 PNi 3rd LegC818ture DIeh1Ct 3rd LeglslaWre 0:30
Q3sirict
5:00 PM G�tho[�C Mess Weekly Caihol9c ARass 1:OU
t€om Ihe Immaculate Heart Relreat
Certter.Alrs each Sunday ai 12pm and
5pm
6:00 PM Lau►Id1Pad LIYi9 pre99rrted by 0:3fl
L�unChPad INW Weekly Talk show
wilh interviews of local 6usiness pea}�le
and companies In key Industry sectors.
Mlssion Is to shine a light on Spokana
buslnesses an
6,30 PM ThlrtyOdd Mlnutes A Trip Belween the 0:30
A6norma[and ihe Paranormal
7:00 PfN Lfving Room Thealef A movie/N 0:30
re�iew show with clips,categories and
games.Sirtce it is a commentary,cllps
are availab[e wilhout permission from
studios lo'Fair Use"
7;30 PM DleC C�oif MQgebne A look al ihe wodd t:OD
of disc golf
8:30 PM Befle[Spolcane Inlerviews focusing on t;D6
tmpraving life ln 5pokane
8:38 PM Just Coolin'History of Jazz,Beep bop, 1:00
R 8�B,and Bfues with Mtchae!Bellamy
(rom Stalen N,
10:38 PM ba Hou�Slem A coliect of shorl films 0:31
(rom ihe 2011 50-Hour 51am
i1:09 PM i��t Hour Programs 5ubmllted by the 0:29
Eastern Washington Unlverslty's Fllm
�ept.
i 1:38 PM CMN ES 14 A look at CMTV and its 0:22
misslon
Generated �0/1120�2 4:10:30 PM Page: 2
5chedule far Community-MEnded TV
AAonday.9r10V2012
i2:00 AM A�Ct[vlgtq A serles facusfng on positive i:00
impacis lo ihe world
1:00 AM Arilst 51�oK+cese CMN Presents local 1:00
art and music
2:00 AM Atltsl SFW�vCese CMN Presenis local 1:00
art and muslc
3:00 AM Arttst ShowCaee CMN Presents local i:00
art and muslc
4:00 AM ArU81 ShowCSSe CMN Presents local 1:00
art and muslc
5:00 AM penlocxa�y Nowt A dally TV news 1:00
program hosled by Amy Goodman 8�
Juan Gonzafez,alring over 854
stalions,the largest wmmunity medla
collaboralion In the U.S.
6:44 AM Llfastyla9 For Beiter ways oi Livfng 0:30
6:34 AM Lif9,qtylg9 For Better ways of L�rfng 0:30
7:00 AM Parldnson"a Speech An ongang series 1:Ot
of informative talks on Par&inson's
disease irom regional experts.F{osted
by lhe Parklnson's Resource Center
8:01 AM Spol�ne Book Report A showcase of 0:59
local au�hors and their works
S:OQ AM DemOCrB,qr IVaw!A daily TV news i.00
program hosted by Amy Goodman 8,
Juan Gonzalez,afring over 850
statlons,[he largest communiiy media
colfaborailon in the U.S.
10:00 AM Rofld to Recovery This program series 1:00
explores ihe benefits of addiction
treatment and Ihe rewards lo recovery
for any lndividuaf.
11;00 AM ACdvfgig A series focusing on posilive 1:00
irttpacFS to the worid
12:00 PM �etb9�'Spol�ne fnlervlews focusing on t:OD
lmproving life{n Spokane
1,00 PM Thpm Har�ilann ShDw Progressfve i;OQ
radio show hostThom Hartmann
discusses the day`s pofitical
happenings.
2:00 PM VetgranS�ott�m Host PJ SCO�t 0:30
in�erviews Washington veterans who
tell their stories.The show is also
des9gned lo provlde helpful Information
for velerans.
2:30 PM !J(q9tydgs For Better ways of Living 0,30
Generated 10/1/2012 4:10:30 PM Page: 3
Schedule for Community-Minded TV
3:DD PM 1�iort�yvest Indlan�Iews 7his monthly �:30
series fells stories from tribes across
fhe Northwest.Featuring traditional
[ndfan celebrations and much more.
3:3D F'M BettBr Spolcene lntervlews[ocusing on 0:30
improving�i[e In Spokane
4:DD PNi De1lioCfscyl�owl A daily N news 1;OD
program hosted by Amy Goalman&
Juan Gonzalez,airing over 85D
staEions,�he largest communily medla
colEabaration In the 13.5.
S:DD PM Better Spol�ne Interviews focusing on 1:U4
improving life in Spokane
6:DD Pf� 5�Ok8ng Velley Giy CoUildl Msetlng A 4:30
broadcasi of the 5eptem6er 4th
Spokane Valley Ciiy Council meelirtg
iD:3D PM LBURChPa(i Llve Rreeenf8d by fl:30
L.�urtChPed INW Weekly 7alk show
with inlervEews of local business people
and companies In key industry sec[ors.
Mission is to shine a light on 5pokane
businesses an
i 1:D0 I'M Meet Ame[ICS Meet America; 1:U0
Environmen#,Animaf,and Human
�[ights issues over[ooked by ihe
mainstream media.
Generated 1 0111201 2 4:10:30 PM Page: 4
Schedule for CommunEty-Minded TV
-r�,esday,9111�2012
12:00 AM Cannat�ls Common Sense A talk show 1:0�
focusing on cannabis and current laws
1:00 Ai�l Artisl S1wwr.ese CPAN Presents local �:ao
arf and music
2:00 AM A[tisl S1wwr.ese CRATV Prasents local 1:OQ
art and music
3:00 AM M181 Show�cese CRATV Presents local 1:Q0
art and music
4:00 AM ArtiA1 ShawC88B CMTV Presents local 1:Q0
arf and muslc
5:00 AM Demacrac.y Nowl A dally TV news i;Q� I
program hosted by Amy Goodman&
Juan Gonzalez,airing over 850 �
stations,the largest community medla �
colfaboration in fihe U,S.
6;00 ARA OCa�py Spokens The occupy Spokane 1:00
movemenf and what it entails.idlore
Informetion availa6le at ,
facebooklaccupy Spokane.Produced I
by Dustin Jolfy&Kyler Katez. Dust I
7,00 APA PopullBt Dleiogue A serles almed at 0:52
highiighting lesser known stories In the
medfa
7,52 APA AcSvlsts A serles focusing on�rsitive 1:08
Impacts to lhe world
9:00 AM aemacrac.y Npwr!A daliy TV news 1:40
program hosted by Amy Qoodman&
Juan Gonzalez,alring over 850
s�afions,the largesk community media
collaboralion In the U.S.
10:00 AA� Brethren Vobea Interviews focusing on 0:30
uplifting the community
10:30 A�1 Lltestylea For Better ways of Living 0:28
10:58 AiN Dr.C)on Conversatfons Each episode f:02
Dr.Oon discusses new and interesting
topics.
12:Q0 PM VBlerans Fo�um Host PJ Scott 0:3E1
lnterviews Washington veterans who
tell thekr slories,The show is also
designed to provide he�pful Informatlon
iorveterans.
12:30 PM 6�tter 5pakene lnterviews focusing on 0,30
improving fife in Spokane I
I
il
�I
Generated 10/1/2012 4:10:30 PM Page: 5 I'i
�
Sc�redu�e for Community-Minded TV
1:00 PM Thom Hartrnartn Shpw Pfogressive i:OD
radio show hosl Thom Hartmann
discusses ihe day's pollt�cal
happenings.
2;00 PM Veiel'8ns ForUm Host PJ Scolt 0:3p
Interviews Washington velerans who
teil their stories.The show is also
designed io provide helpful informalion
for veterans,
2:30 PM Husslan Proprsmmin�Through 0:43
Hardships-Teslirnony through
hardships of prisoners[rom Russia
3:13 PM Bettef Spokane Nahefe Walking Wilh 0:21
Jfm Stollz-
3:34 PM ,4Ctlul3ts A series(ocusing on positive 0:26
impacts lo Ihe worid
4:00 PM 1]empcxaCy Nowf A da4y TV news 1:OD
prpgram hosted hy Amy Goodman&
Juan GonYalez,alring over 850
statlons,the largest communi[y media
collaboration In the Li.S.
5:00 PM Nslldrtsotl'9 u�eech An ongoing series 0;59
of[nformative talks on Parkinson's
disease trom regional experts.Hosted
hy the Parkinson`s Resourca Centar
5:59 PM @etler SpQl�fle�he[s Walking V�lith 4:27
Jim Siollz-
6:26 PM DI9C GoH MA�nB A look at ihe world 1;02
of disc golf
7:28 PM Acdvlgtg A series focusing on posilive 4:32
impacis to the wodd
8:00 F'M 5(1 Hou[S[&RS A collec�of short lilms 0:34
from lhe 2011 50-HOUrSIam
8:31 F'3N R.AM.P.S.This is a video forum ihat 027
showcases ska�eboarders,musfcians,
and artisls
8:58 PM Just Coolin'History of Jazz,Beap bop, 1:0&
fi&B,and 81�es wilh MiChael 8ellamy
from 5taten TV.
10:04 Ph� Blacfc In SpoF�ne A look at black 0:26
hislory In 5pokane
i0:30 PM 111f�Hour Programs Suhmiued by Ihe 0:35
Eastern Washington Universlty's Film
Dept.
Generated 1 0/1/201 2 4.�0:30 PM Page: E
Schedule for Community-Minded TV
11:05 PM MeetAmer�Ca iNeet America; b:55
�nvironment,Anlmal,and Human
Rtghts Issues overlaaked by Ihe
mafnstream media.
Generated �0/�/20�2 4:10:30 PM Page: 7
Schedule for Community-Minded TV
wsa��saa,y,e�iznol2
i2:00 AM �ay USA News and analyst of lhe 1:00
LGBTQ community
1:00 AM Dr.DOrt Cdlv�stlpng Each episode i:flfl
Dr.�on discusses new and interesting
fOpICS.
2;OOAM NdstSFrpNNCBgg CiNN Presents local 1;QD
art and muslc
3:00 AWI Attlst Sho4VC8se CA+IN Presenis loca[ i:00
art and music
4:OQ AM Artls#ShptivC&g6 CMN Presenls local t:00
art and music
5:00 AM DemOCrac.y NvW1 A daily TV news t:00
program hosted�y Amy Goodman&
Juan Gonzalez,alring over 850
stalions,the largest community media
colla6ora�ion in ihe U.S.
6:OD A�vi PJ,4L Dealleg WRh the Pdloe Learn 0:55
your rights when encounlering ihe
police
fi:55 AiVI RoB,d to ReCOV�ery This program ser�es i:Di
explores the benelits of addictEon
lrealmentand the rewards lo recovery
ior any Individual.
7:56AM Qu1gtTlmeTelesChlldfen5loriesand D:30
Great Illustradons Read Aloud.
8;2SAiN Dpnlcgypl119 Bi61ica1 adventures with 0:34
011le and his triends
9:00 AAA Democrac.y NvW1 A daily TV news i;00
program hosted�y Amy Goodman&
Juan Gonzalez,air�ng over 85D
stafians,the largest communily medla
coilaboration in Ihe U.S.
1 D:00 AM Bei1gP Spol�ne Intervlews focusing on 1:00
improving life In Spokane
11:00 AM Brethrgrt Voloes fn�enriews focusing on 0;29
uplifting Ihe communEty
i 1:29 AiN &d L.eebisture�f9trlc,'t 3rd Legislature fl:16
DisErlct
11:45 AM BettAr Spol�ne Intenriews focusing on i:15
improving life in Spolcane
1:DD PM Tttom Hartrrl8r�e 5how Progressive 1:Qp
radio show hosl Thom Hartmann
discusses 1he cfay's political �
happenings.
2:OD PM LfnkNAncient Fulures i:00
Generated 101�/20�2 4:�a:3a PM Page: 8
Schedule #or Comm�nity-Minded TV
3:00 P�t�4 Ftoad eo Re�L�OV�ary 7his pragram series f,fl0
explores the beneffts of addlc�fon
freatment and 1he rewards to recovery
for any Individual.
4:00 PM DemoCrei.yr Nowl A daily TV news 1:fl0
program hosted by Amy Goodman&
Juan Gonzalez,alring over 850
slatians,the largesk communily media
collabaration In lhe U.S.
5;00 PM Uiso Golf MAga�ng A laak at ihe worid t:00
of disc gotf
6:00 Pivl IVorthwsst Indlen Newe This manth�y 0:29
series tells storles from tribes across
the Norihwest.Featuring Iradillonal
[ndian celebralions and much more.
6:29 PM LInkN Ma[cing a Garden 0:29
6:58 PM ��.DOn Conve�seHon9 Each eplsode 1:40
Dr.Don discusses new and interesling
topics.
7:58 PPA Ruselen ProgTSmming Through 0:39
Hardshfps-Testimony ihrough
hardships of prisoners from Russ[a
8:37 PM 3rtl l..�plsle�ture UlstrlCt 3rd Leglslalure 0:21
�Istrict
8:58 PiUI Ev6rgreen Cooperathre A look at Ihe 1;06
�vergreen caaperative experiment in
Ohlo,
1 U:04 P�+l LEving Hoom Theg{�A mo�iefN 0:30
review show with clips,categories and
games.Since it Is a commentary,cllps
are available withaut permisslon irom
stud'€os to"Fair lJse"
10:34 PM Spol�ne Book RepcNt A shawcase of 0:2fi
local authors and their works
11:�PM 11th Hour Programs Submitled by ihe 0:2H
Eastern Washingtan Llnfversity's FI[m
pept.
11:26 Pivl fnt��rl8te(�Dnfeseion9 fnlimafe D:34
Confessions
Generated 10/1/2012 4:10:30 PM Page: 9
Schedule for Community-Minded TV
7hu�y,�1�2012
12:�AM Cen[I8b13 Co�1101op Sen9A A lalk show i:00
focusing on cannabfs and current laws
1:00 AM Cannabls CornmOn Sen9A A talk show i:OD
focusing on cannabls and current laws
2;00 AM Arltst ShowCa�g CMN Presents local i:00
arkand music
3:00 AM Artlst Sho�case CMN Presents local i:00
artand musRc
4:00 AM Arlfigt 5hoyyCasg CMN Pfesents local 1:OD
art and music
5:00 AM Demoaa[.y NoVrl A daily TV news 1:00
program hosled by Amy Goodman&
Juan Gonzalez,airing over 850
stations,the largest community media
colfaboration in the U.S.
&:00 AM Ur,Qotl Cott�e�sa�ans Each episode 1:00
Dr.�on discusses new and interesting
topios.
7:00 AM 818thfen Vo[oB9 inferviews focusing on 0:30
uplifling the communily
7:30 AM MggtAmerk�MeetAmerica: 1:30
Envlronment,Animal,and Human
Rights�ssues overlooked by the
mainstream medla.
5;00 AM Demoaa[.y NoVrl A dally TV news 1:00
program hosled by Amy Goodman&
Juan Gonzalez,airing over 850
stations,the la►gest community media
eallaboration in the U.S.
10:60 AM PBridr►9on'8 S�eCh An ongang series b:55
of inFormative taEks on Parkinson's
disEase from regional experts.Hastet3
by Ihe Parklnson's Resource Center
10:55 AM Bette�Spof�le Inferviews Focusing on 4:00
Improving life�n Spolcane
1i;55AM BetferSpof�nelVBlureWalkingWith fl:25
Jim StoRz-
12:20 PM �iBCk In Spol�ne A look at black 0:1 B
history in Spokane
i2;3&PM BeitBrSpOf�ne Irsterviews focusing on D;2�
improving life In SpoEcane
1:00 PM T{�cxn HartrnAr�n Show Progressive 1:D0
radio show hostThom Harlmann
discusses the day's polilical
happenings.
Generated 1 0111201 2 4;1 Q:30 PM Page: 10
Schedule for Communi�y-Minded TV
2:DD PM I][SC GoEf Mflgebn6 A look at the world 1:00
af disc golf
3:DD PM Qulef'iimeTales Children Slories and 0:30
Great Uluslralions Read Aloud.
3:30 P�11 DonEcey 01116 Biblical advenlures with 0:30
011ie and hls friends
4:00 PM DemoCra4y T�1awl A daily TV nEws 1:00
pragram hosted by Amy Goodman&
Juan Gonzalez,airing over 850
staiions,ihe fargest community media
collaboration in ihe U.S.
5:D0 PM ACt1Y1518 A seties focusing on positive 1:00
kmpacls io the world
6:OD P�11 Popull8t UIltloguB A series aimed at 0:3fl
highllghting lesser known stories in lhe
media
6:30 PM L�festyfe8 For Better ways of Liv]ng d:30
7:00 PM PJAL Key Nots Address The Keynote D:58
address from PJAL�conomic
Conference.
7:58 PM 6pol�ne Book R9port A showcase of 1:D]
focal aufhors and their works
8:59 PM LInkTV Makir�a Garden 0:31
9:30 P�A Be�terSpol�ne Nowhere left 0:30
10:D0 PM RAM.P.S.This is a video forum that 0:30
showcases skateboarders,musicians,
and art[sts
10:30 pNl TOUrSh�pA music lnterview show 0:30
featuring Minus the 8ear,8realhe
Carolina and Talk Demonic
11:00 P3N 11th Hour Programs Submitteq by ihe 0:3fl
Easiern Washington University's Film
oept.
11:30 PA� L[ving Room Thefl69r A movielN 0:30
revlew show wilh clips,calegories and
games.Since it ls a commentary,cfips
are avallab[e wilhout permission from
studios lo'Fair Use°
Generated 1011120�2 4:�0:30 PM Page: i i
Schedule for Community-Minded TV
Fddq}I.91I1412012
12:00 AM Cannabls Common Sense A ta�k show 1:00
focusing on cannabis and currenl laws
1:00 AM Cannabls Common Sense A talk show 1:OD
focusing on cannabis and current laws
2:00 AM CM'fV Is 14 A look at CMTV and Ils 0:17
mission
2:17 AM Ml8t Show�Ceee CMN Presenls local 1:03
art and music
3:20 AM ,4[ti81 Stro�vCase CRAN Presents local 1:14
art and music
4:34 AM Ths AID3 Crls[e Expressed in Rhythm, D;10
dance and 5poken Ward.
4:44 AM 88fte�SpoksRe Interviews focusing on d:i6
iroprov�ng life In Spokane
5:00 AM Democracy Nowl A dally TV news 1:00
program hosled by Amy Goaiman&
Juan Gonzaler,airing over 850
sta#ions,Ihe largest community media
collaboration in the U.S.
fi:00 A3N Bett9rSpokene Interviews locusing on 1:Ofl
Improving life in Spokane
7:00 AM Qu18t71me7e1es Chlldren 5tories and 0:3D
Great Itluslrabons Read Aloud.
7:30 AM Uanlcsy OIIls Bibl�cal adventures wilh �:30
011ie and his[r9ends
8:00 AM L�rtkN Far Bellerways of Living 0:3D
B:30 AM Better Sp0lcnne Nflture Walking With 0:30
Jim 5to�tz-
9:00 AM DemOOrecylVowf A daily TV news 1:00
program hosted by Amy Goodman 8�
Juan Gonzalez,airing over B5D
staiions,the la�gest communily media
collaboration in the U.S.
1D;Q0 AM Popul�st DtalogtleA series almed al 0:30
htghlighting lesser known stories fn the
medla
1 D:30 AM Retter Sp0lae�na Enterv�ews focusing on 0:2p
fmproving life in Spokane
1 D.5D AM Brgt�ren Voloea lnlerviews focusing on 0:35
uplifting the communify
11:25 AM Better Spokene Nflture WaEking With 0:35
Jim 5loltz-
12:Q0 PM 8etterSpol�ne Intervlews focusing on 1:OD
Improving life in 5pokane
Generated 1 0111201 2 4:10:30 PM Page: 12
Schedule for Community-Minded TV
1:00 PM Thom Haitrnann SEqw Progressive 1:OQ
radio show hosiThom Hartmann
discusses ihe day's poliflcal
happenings.
2:00 PM Cefp Inbanrlew Russ Busch&Narriet 4:3E3
Bu€litt
2:30 PM Sf981ing Ame1{ca Voffi by VOba Hisiory 1:30
expiain the challengas of the American
voting system
4:00 P�A DemoCraGy No�wl A daily TV naws 1:00
program hosted by Amy Goodman&
Juan Gonzalez,alring over 850
staiions,ihe largest communiiy medla
callaboration in Ihe U.S.
5:00 PPA A,A.M.P.S.This is a v�deo forum Ihat 6:30
showcases skateboarders,musidans,
and artists
5:30 PiN 7our5bop An interview show feaiuring 6:28
some of the 6iggest names�n music
5:59 PM fi0 Houf Slem A collact of short films 0:32
irom the 201 i 5aHour Slam '
6:31 PM 50 Houf 51em A collact of short films 0:32
irom the 201� 5aHour S1am
7:03 PiN A+Ctivis�A series focusing on positive 0;57
€mpac#s to the world
8:00 PM ROfld 6o R9Cav9ry Thls program series 1:00
expfores the banefits of addictlon
ireatment and Ihe rewards to recovery
(or any indivldual.
9:00 PM Sp Houf 51em A collecl of short fi�ms 0:3i
(rom the 2011 5aHour Slam
9:31 PM 50 HoUf 51em A collect of shor[films D:33
irom the 2011 5aHour Slam
10:04 PM t+lorthwest Irldlall NeMrs 7his monthly 0:3D
saries talls stories[rom tribes across
the Northwasl,Featuring tradilional
lndian celebralions and much more.
10:34 PM 7}t&lang�s IJ�9n Tha King's Man 1;26
Generated 1 0/1/201 2 4:10:30 PM Page: 13
Scheduie for Community-MEnded TV
5aturday�9/i5r1012
12:�AM Demertled Driv�In The Brain the i:b6
Wouldn't Qie
1;56 AM ArtlstSh�wCdBe CMN Presents local i:04
art and music
3:00 AM AttlStSh�wCdBe CMN Presenls local 1:00
art and music
4:00 AM Ar88tShovMCe99 CMN Presents local 1:00
art and music
5:00 AM ArlistSho�wCa6g CMN Presents local 1:00
art and music
6:00 AM AI'�tShOw�Ca99 CMN Presents local 1:4D
artand music
7:00 AM Artist ShowC&ss CMN Presenfs Iocal i:�0
art and music
8:00 AM Donkey Ol][e Biblical advenlures with 0:30
011le and his friands
8:30 AM Qulet lime Te[es Children 5tories and 0:34
Great Illustra6ons fiead Aloud.
9:00 AM DlBC C,otf Magatlne A look at the warld t:00
of disC golf
1 U:�AM Thltiy Odd Mlnutes A Trip Beriveen the 0:3D
Abnormal and 1he Paranormal
10:30 AM MeatAm&ric&Meet Amerlca: 0:55
�nvironment,Animaf,and Human
Rights issues overlooked by ihe
mainstream media,
11:25 AM Bfal�lren Vdcea Inierviews focusing on 0:30
ugfiffing the communily
11:55 AM Populist D{alopue A series aimed at 0:30
highlighting lesser known stories in Ihe
media
12:25 PM Betler Spolsar►e Naiure Walking V�filh 0:30
Jlm 5rollz-
12:55 f'M A�C1ivI8CB A series focusing on posNive i;Ofl
impacts to the world
1:55 PM Guit Co3st BIu99 OII in our veins,An t;19
up front�ook at ihe o�l splll�n 1he Gulf.
3:14 PlVI LlfestyEes For Betfier ways of Living 0:29
3:43 PM 7renssolaC G8l4GHc�t A sci-fi parody 0:18
show
3;59 PM plsc Golf Msgazlne A look at the world i;01
of disC goiE
5:00 P�vl PJ,4L Youttl Penei The youth panel 1:00
from the PJAL conference
Generated 1 D/1/2012 4:�D:3D PM Page: �4
Schedule for Cammunity-Minded TV
6:00 PM Russlan Prpgramming Through U:3U
Flardships-Tesflmony through
hardships of prisoners from Russia
6:3U PM Papu11s1�lelvgtle A serles aimed at 0:28
highlighting fesser known sfaries in the
media
&:58 PiN Touf Spop A music Interview shaw 0:24
fealuring some of ihe biggesl names in
music
7:22 PiN Llvlrlg Room ThefltBr A movielTV 0:33
review show with clips,categorles and
games.Sinca it is a commentary,clips
are avallable withaut permission from
studios to"Falr Use"
7:55 PM JustCoolln`Hlstory of Jazz,Beep bop, 1:00
R&B,and Blues with Mlchael Bellamy
irom 5taten N.
8:55 PM LHBSiyles For Beller ways of Lfving 0:35
9:30 PM GuNCoeetBlues pil in our veins.An 1;15
up front look at Ihe oif spill In fihe Gulf.
1U:45 PiN LInkN Fall harvest U:13
tU.58 PiN 11tn hlajr Pragrams Submi�ted 4y lhe Q:34
Eastern Washington Universit}r`s Fi1m
bept.
t 1:32 PM Black In 5pol�ne A look at black 0:28
hlsfory in Spokane
Generated 1 0/1/201 2 4:10:30 PM Page: 15
Schedu�e for Community-Minded TV
SundB,y,91'18/F012
12:D4 AM pemeflGEd Dfire-In The Galaxy Inaader t,54
]:54 AM ArtistSF�owcasa CMN Presenls local i:01
art and music
2:55 AM ArtlstShowcase CMN Presenls local i:05
art and music
4:00 AM Artlst SFiow�sse CMN Presenls local i:00
art and music
5:00 AM Ntl9tSFio�w�sse CMN Presents local 1:00
art and music
&:00 AM ArtfatSFiaw�sse CMN Presents]ocal 1:00
art and music
7:00 AM Art�st Shaw+caee CMN Presents local ]:00
art and music
B:�O AhA I..Iving by Ffllth Bible teachings about 0:30
failh by Pastor Qtis Manning.
8:30 AM LaunchPad Llve preaeirted by 6:30
LflunchPad INW Weekly Talk show
with interriews of local business people
and companies In key industry seclors.
Mission is to shine a Ilght on Spolcane
buslnesses an
9:00 AM E�e�green Cooperative A look at the 3:04
Evergreen cooperative experiment In
Ohlo.
iD:04 AM Donkey pll[e Biblical adventures wilh 0:28
Qllie and his friends
10:32 ANi Qu1et Tlme Ta169 Children Stories and 0:26
Great llluslrations Read Aloud.
10:58 AM s^p01�rte BOOkReport A showcase of 1:02
local authors and their worlcs
12:D0 PM Cett�ollC Mfl89 Weelcly Cathdic Mass 0:51
from the lmmaculate Heart Retreat
Center.Alrs each Sunday at 12pm and
5pm
12:5i PM LN[ngbyFB.ftt�Bible teachings about 0:30
faith by Pastor Qlis k[anning.
i;2i PM Donksy 4ille B[bilcal advent�res wilh 0:33
pllle and his frfends
t:54 PM Bluegrass Sgokane Bluegrass[ilmed O;h4
by locak filmster Richard Peterson 509-
48&fl465
2:38 PM CMIY Is 14 A look at CMTV and Rs a:22
mission
Generated 101�/2012 4:�0:30 PM Page: 16
Schedule for Community-Minded TV
3:00 PNi Popullsl plalogua A series almed at 0:26
highlighfing lesser known stories in the
media
3:28 PNi Bptiar Spol�ne Interviews focusing on 0:28
improving life In Spokane
3:56 PPA Th6 Gflrepe 51ww Simple garage 0:32
projecls that don't requlre compltcated
equipment are created.
A28 PM 3rd i.eglsla�re Q�MCt 3rd Legislalure 0:32
DislriCt
5:00 PM Cet�oifc Mess Weekty Caiholic Mass Q;45
[rorn the Immaculale Heart Retreat
Center.Alrs each Sunday at 12pm and
5pm
5;45 PM LaullCfiPad LIVe pi�sented by a:35
L�unchPad INW Weekly 7alk show
with interviews ot[ocal bus�ness people
and companies�n key industry sectors.
PAlssion is to shine a light on Spokane
businesses an
6,2D PM ThIRyOddMlnu6esATrip Between lhe D:31
Abnormal and 1he Paranormal
6:Si PM llv�ng Room Thea�gr A movielN 0:30
review show wilh clips,categories and
games.Since it is a commentary,clips
are available wilhouf permission irom
studios to"Fair Use"
7:21 PM Q1SC GOfI MsgN�rlg A look at the world 1:03
of disc golf
8:24 P€v1 Dr.Don Co[nrersetlOne�ach episode 1:04
qr.Don dlscusses new and interesting
topics.
9:24 P�II Jusf Coolln'History of Jazz,8eep bop, 1 AE3
fi&B,and Blues wilh Mlchael BelEamy
trom Staten N.
10:24 PM r0 Ffout Siem A collect of short fi[ms E1:3E3
from the 2011 SaHour Slam
10:54 PPA 11Th!-10u�Programs Submitled by the 0:30
Eastern Washinglon lfniversily's Fflm
�ept.
11;24 PM CM'!`V Is 14A look al CMTV and ifs O:i6
misslon
11:40 PM BBtbat Spo4�rse Interv�ews focusing on 0;20
improving life in Spokane
Generated 1 011 120 1 2 �4:10:30 PM Page; 17
:■
y :�Community 25 W. Main Ave. ° 509-444-3381
�:�•� Minded � Suite 300 � ' communiry-mindedtv.org
� ��� Tele�ision Spakane, WA 99201 � cmtv@communiry-minded.org
STATEMEHT DF CDMPLIANCE: COMMUNfTY-MINDED TELEVISIDN AND CDMCAST
Community-►vlinded N meets Comcast's reasonable video and audio signal quality/tech requirements.
� Audio is broadcasting at a digital signal of-12db. White and black levels are within broadcast range.
There are no pending disputes regarding the same.
CMN's Program Proposaf and Master Submission forms (see attachments)stipufate that program
producers assume Eega� responsibility for programming content and copyrighted material cfearances.
7f�e City of Spokane and Comcast are indemnified from any�oss or liability resufting from programs
running on Spokane cable channel J.4.
� � °� � @
�
Community-Minded Television
Boai•d Coordinating Committee Contact Information
2012
(Ex-Officio}
KAthy Tl�amm Com�nunity-Minded Enterprises Phone; 209-2605
Executive Director 25 W. Main Street Ste 310 Fax: 444-3077
Spokane, WA 99201 kathyt@community-minded.org
Robert Foote 25 W. Main, 3rd Floor Phone: 509-209-2651
General Manager Spokane, WA 99201 Fax: 509-444-3077
rob ertf@co mmunit y-minded.o rg
Daniel Reyes 25 W. Main, 3rd Floor Phone: 509-209-2617
Production Coordinator Spokane, WA 99201 Fax: 509-444-3077
danielr@co manunit y-minded.o rg
Committee
Sandy Krause b910 S. Ben Burr Road Phone:509-448-1224
Committee Chairperson Spokane, WA 99223 skrause@inc�.com
Christopher Kelly Entrepreneur Phone: 483-2320
1203 E Indiana cmk@tipperary-press.com
Spokane, WA 99207
Claude Kistler 3911 S. Regal St Phone: 5�9-354-7704
General Manager-KSPS Spokane WA 99223 claudek@spokaneschools.org
Mark Beattie 502 East Boone Ave Phone: 509.313.6658
Director of Student Services MSC Box 2616. Spokane,. beattiem@jepson.gonzaga.edu
Gonzaga Virtual Campus WA 99258
Easy 11 b E. 40th Ave. Phone: 509-340-13b4
Spokane, WA 99203 easy4@waterplanet.ws
f
I
Sarah Monroe EWU Film and Digital Media Phone: NA at time of print �
Professor smonroe@ewu.edu
Naci Seyhanli Spokane Regional Health District Phone: 5�9-324-1529
Video Production Specialist
�r�a��r��,�� �
�}
Sp��a�e _
Inc�rpor�t�d���/�-� r„
No�vember 5, 2Q12
Honorable Tam 7owey, Mayar
Mr. Mike lackson, City Manager
11707 E Spra�ue Avenue,#�.06
SpaEcane Valley, WA 99206
Mayor 7owey, Mr.Jackson, and members af the City Council:
Greater 5pokane Incarparated is pleased to s�hmit its 2012 ti�ird quarter re�ort of actovities
to the City of Spokane Valley.
This report includes information an the following:
➢ Recruitment Activities
➢ Business R�tention, Expansion and Assistance
➢ Prajeet Summa�ies
I
The report also includes copies of�arious marketing materials that were distributed
during the quarter.
If you haue any questions about the report, pfeas�give me a call.
Sincerely,
����� a��
Robin B.Toth
VP, Business Development
Greater SpoEcane Ineorparated
Atta ch ment
� � )' - - — - - - - 1'il'dl"�',f7�t-h:l("al:jpl�a�:t;lll;�!'�lf�; �� 'Ii.��idlP:.c.��•{:}�:l.l�'���'�
�t
�
Q3 20Z2 Business Development
City of Spokane Valley �umrrtary
2012 OBJ�C71VE5
* Provide exceptional ser�ices ta enable business start up, exparision and relacation in the Region
• Build national awareness of aur region as the premier place to da business
i � �nYrance reg'ronal livability thraugh advocacy f�r transportation, education, healt'hcare and rQCreation
• Position the region for ecanomic expansion by partnering to establish a highly educated
and technically skilled workforce
2012 Q3 WINS
✓� Confidential recruitment to the City af Spakane Valley
0 40 new jobs
✓ Confidential retention in the City of Liberty Lake
0 20 new jobs
�conamic Impact
0 60 new jobs/$3.3 million payroll
a $63 million annual economic imp�ct
o $898,083 in state ar�d local tax revenue generated
o $199,610 City of Spokane Valley tax revenue generated
Q3 SUCE55ES
Recruitment
� • Working 77 qualified leads; 10 Manufacturing, 19 Clean Tech, 13 Busin�ss antf Professional Services,
4 Information Technolo�y, 5 Aerospace,4 Health Sciences, 16 Advancer� Manufact��ring, 6 Others
• 7 proposals sent
• 4 inbound�isits from lowa, Washington, Georgia, and New York I
• Attended Washington Biotechnology& 8iorr�edical Association (WBBA) Life Science Leadership Summit in
Seattle in June
• AirS�akane—aerospace praposal package completed and distributed at meetings on Governar"s Trade Mission
to Farnborough Air Show
• Advantage Spokane emailed tc� 3000+site selectors
• www.SelectSpokane.corn, 385 City af Spokane Valley properties listed
Retention & Expansion
• 1 retention win
, • �4�isits to City of 5pokane Valley �usinesses
• 54 Business Assists ta businesses in the City af S�okane Valiey
• 14 Workshops offered ca�ering small business iss�ues and gavernment contracting
, Projects:
• AirSpokane—certified site fln West Plains ready and marketed to aerospace cornpanies-
print proposal and videoformats, funded by Econ�mic Developmerrt Inno�ation Fund grarat
• Robin Toth sits on Spokane Valley's Economic Development Council
• Port District—organized tour of Port Qistricts in Moses Lake,Wafla Walla, and Benton -Aug. 8&9
Attendii�g from S�okane Vall�y: Deputy Mayor Gary Schimmels; Matt Ewers, Inland Empire Distributian Systems,
Ro�Gragg, Crawn West Realty; Nancy Holmes, Greater S�akane Valley Chamber;John Miller, Divcon, Inc.
• Bt�sine5s Barometer pub�ished
� tiS'-4','A7";I�II:I:SS�'14���1o{:i%lil�,{et(a,l � i,i�1111�'�I'10�;�%n�����; �
• Governor's 7th Ar�nual Aeraspace Summit, 5eptember 12 & 13
at the 5pokane Convention Gen�er
— d��..���.+�v ► a¢'� �� ,�,. _
I . -- _ �� G��...
- -_�--- rr..��
' --- _ , .���., I
�
1 .,�. � -
;, -�;''. _.:� �--- --
, � � 1M� � � ��. ' .
�. � , ?� ��
� , ,
~+ � *` �.�� "_�� �f ''��'� �y� �l'� �"
�, � -•-„ ,�' ���, .� ���_---
_��f�.� �� �"
City of 5pofcane Valley Activities
• MarEcet City of Spakane Valley property
+ �mail newsletfers and quarterly rnailings to over 3,000 site selectors, corporat� real estate brokers and
prospective cornpany targets for business recruitment
• Fast Facidity website highlights:
• Pinecroft Business Park htt,�://tivww.fastf��rlity,comffact sheet two.asp?36b30
• Spakane Business and Industriaf Park http:f/+Nww.fUStfacility.com/faet sheeC two.as�?35624
• 5even proposals went out including 4 Spokane Valley properties
�
i' * Provide autreac�t to City of Spokane Valley businesses for retentian,expansion and assistance
• 1�4 City of Spokane Valley comRanies visited for reterrtion and expansion issuQs
• 17 City af Spokane Valley companies assisted with various business issues
I1 • Targeted Industry 5ectors
� • Aeros�ace
I • fNWAC—Inkand Northwest Aerospace Cansortium meetings, regianal directory
Host website: www. inwae.com -842 visits in Q3
• Partner an AIR Spokane, Farnborough Air Show and Governar's Trade Mission, and Gaverrtar's
Aerospace Surrpmit
• Clean Tech
; + CLEEN�NW—Cor�sartium of l,eading Energy Efficiency Northwest Compani�s
� Host website: www,cfeennw,org—123 views in Q3
• Manufacturing
• Manufacturers Roundtable meets monthly
• Manufacturing Summit-workshops, roundtable discussions, s�eakers—July 10
• Procurement Technical Assistance Center�PTAC)—Go�ernment Contracting
• 206 clients, 18 new clier�t counseling appointments, 57 follaw-ups wiCh existing clients
• Six workshops on Cantracting with the Governrr�ent
�
� 15 5pokane Valley campanies reported contracks for$667,164
,,
�re�l�r Spc�l�����
ncorpora�ed i�
worl�ing �o build a
� � s�rang economy in �
,� �0�2-2��3
the S�okane region
and the I�land
l�ar€hwest�
�������« ���i�
�3uilc!natioi�al aware��ess o��poftane
as tiie premier plac�tia do i�us9ness.
" � P�•ovide�xceE�tional services to enal�le
����-�- .
` ' ' r � �� ,',� �� , -,�, � '—� I�usisiess�tai��-u�, expai�sian,anci
�; ` ' '+" r l•eloca4ion 4o fh�rec�ion.
� �nhanc��-e�iana[livabilify�hrout�h
�F: advocacy�or fraiisportation,
� r �:� ` etlucatior�, healihcar�e, pul�lic saf�ty,
� . ��..I,.i�,a � � .,r` �i� , s1+a. 't,i,°�`�', ` I���; �- ��.�„ ,
! — � {� f �iC�i ' .t.' ', .r, f r t..^d�r�Yy c�Il(� YeCYG'a�1011al O�(J�Y7U171412S.
' ,e{ .tr� , .I i �€1 d�,� sj"�,�,i 'f ri,� , ���,� `��y�'�'4�.
i . 1� � :, i a s fe� d
.i .�� F j. �,' r ���Sf� i i�F.� '�:'i� P''L�Iripp�rt ��.. � i ..
1" ' .� � ' ' r, � - , r��r �+��,.-� . f��sitian tii��•e ion fa�•econamiG
� �`�' � �� , � 7 � , 3r�rrt r�� �! Jfk� j ! � . '�
, �� i � ���' �- , L,I��lr ��, ' � i r r r r l,r i ' � i r,.� � �i� f�f' y� � ��1 expansioi�hy pa��tneriny fo esiaEalis1l
; � ir � , �s � + = 1 �, _ , i� ���? ' :�'1�� ,�I�'I� � ������1��
`�* xM'.. , �'' �,'� � ,,r� ,f sx� `�� ,� ir� � � ,`�! � �!� 1 � a highly educa�ed�+nc�tecl3nically
I �S� � , 4',L _ .., i '1��� ° v� i,! � V �� ! S k-�1 , I-" �. —
�.,�?q..
���� �l�,;l jr`��I ao"" i-��' i �!� " ' �� � �I ;1� ���_l' r�'�- 4" � �f ) �� s,n� �� �_J�;��j-; _ slcilled worlcforce,and responcling to
� ) � ,1 � �
r i 4f' � i r ��u i 3{J�i��� ■
�_��fE'� ;, ,- ,, i i��IR ti;r„�����. i���,` �1'}(e�j1 tfr ,1U1 i 9�::J s f e�n�rloyer�i�eds.
- �c--o - � ' �
I�� ��I• �"�'�. � a r��.s �r. '�"'S� _ -_
� �� +II ��'�s,'�'--�� ����� .
� _�v.i �.,• . . -^ -,= " ' �- . . Ai�tYaCfinvestor�ei}ffifomm�Ynb�rsanC�
If ��� � �I- � #- � �� f I ' .� � ; h�� �, � ��„�:s'`.��. '�,� .`�'�"'f/ e�^r� E�tEblie stal,eholders stif�icienE fio
sf �! �I :i� � � � 1� I� �� �, �� �� �= � __; . _ -� -- � i ou s�on an � ic+rri�es o�
1 , .. ;' �� ' _ , !f li II il � ��� } �,.i4 � � ' _
� ca•�y ��fz�vi ' d r'
<� .: � � �� ��,�� �� �� � ���� � � �ii�ok•gaa�izafion.
' � ' ' _ �
• � I� � __ ,,�P������ , � :
�� i` � :' ` -� { k t�� •; {� � ..,;' •' `� {;ecruit er.e��fianal leaclersfii�to#Eie
. , • ., _ �:=��T,�����,�,�?1���,��%'r"a,'�:��pz` i I
r - _ f . � ,� • � E�c�a��d a��d to Yhe statt.
. ' •�
_ i .•��� 1�� �?, _ �,
, _.
` - ._ . r �i, '`
I ` -�`.-- �.:� ,.. . . � �.�. ��.,� ��. r��� _ 7
�'. +' �;, `� f�1� �i .� �_�l l�'s�:l{'-i`�.'� \
. 't � r�� � ��
I � . _ }�V ` 'b* ,��'i` � ������ � .\
. ; _ , `.,��� ;.,� ` :. , � f�it;t:?t�st���=��ic;c� `�' �
, . � r ,
� � , ,, �-_�'' � •t'' . , '
� I':,t�,' '' �• . ' �...
`���,�x,��i.� �%r�ate Sarr,etr�iFx�Gre�ter
�
. �
1� ! '' r
�, � Creater upokane Incorporated
� „+ � k � 8Di 4V. Rlverslde Ave„Stiife 100
4 `
_ ,1.`:' 4 i�E'�.Y:`:t _ (,� Spo!<ane,VvA 9�2U1
-- -- --- l��� 5D�J.G2u.'1333 greater�p�okane.or�
�r���v� �,;�ca)�:�f�C�� r('�si�����C�.�l��i��``� �.�`..
r7
�d��l�ll�l@� �1ClC� �F'I��'I�I�ed �� �F1� ° Flea�os�ace Iniiiafive for�I�iecruitrrie��t(/11Fi Sr�ol�anej
�O�CC�, '�h� ���derSf�ll�} 4f �i�l Com�fete cerkified si#es at Spokane In#ernational
Airpart and market these sites to attract aerospace
will fiocus on �hese s�tra�ec��c cam�anies.
ok�jectiUe� tha# are critical �� the
� TransportationNVorth Spolcai�e Cor�•idar�NS�}
succ�ss ofi #he rec�i�n. �ri�e for a regional integrated transportatior-�
system (roads, rail,air,freic�ht,transit and personal
� Fairchild Air�arce F3ase[A�Ei}and 1"ank�rs T710I71I1'�]l�,go�ernance madef and funding strategy,
Advocate for basing af the new KC-�BA tankers Support Keep Spokane Moving to complete the
at Fairc�ild AFB. Suppork ac�ditional military North Spakane Corridor and advocate for$300-$6QD
infrastruature and adoption of the J4int Land Use million in the State transporka#�on pacEtage.
Study to�arevent encroachment,
e Part District
� Acad�mic 1-leaith Science Center l.ead tiae res�arch, dialogue and puialic awareness
The new�iomedical&Nealth Science buildin� around#he possibility of implementing a eaunty-
will house tF�e sehools of inedicine and pharmaey. wide Port District to suppor#regional economic
Funds have been raised for developing the 2nd year development initiatives.
medical educativn curriculum. Business{�lans for
growiny graduate medical education{GME)and
health science research and economic develo�ment
wilf be compfeted.
C �-- - -- _ - - - - --- �"
�corioinic De�elopment Ecfucation &Workforce
Attr�act and suppori new and curr�nt husiness investment ir� Partn�r with I�-12, higlier ed�ication, and local businesses to
the re�ion resufitine�in a diverse and strong economic bas�, deuelo�, attract, and ret�in a hiyhiy educated aRd skilled
leading to na4v welf-payinc� careers, wori<force.
Q Grow jobs locally by supporlinc�tk�e sxpansion ancl retenfion � Linlc�7ic�her ed�cc�tion mtire closely to industry gro���h
o€local businesses anci outreach to 200 local businesses sectors and su�por� university research ancl researc��
� Bring netiv opportui7ities to Spo4<a�ie by targeting#wo ins#itutes
'signature fogo' �ros��ects anci two n�tional headc�uarters � S��ppart Spolcane STEM (Science,TecY�nolor�y, En�ineering,
� Ge2�erate 50 qualified leads,thre� business wins, 15f1 new Math) iJettinrorlc, and assist in fhe development of the
jot�s, and�18 mi�lion i�� arnita�l econQr��ic ir�pact business plan for STEM ec}ucation
� War���vit��partners#o exparad anci marl<et portfolio af O Partner wi;h Eastern Washington Uneversi4y to f�ost the 2013
ee�tified sites FIRST Rol�otics Reyianal Competition
� Lead tf�e researcli, dialague and public ativareness arQUn�€ o Partner to stage i�iajor Car�er Explorafian event
fhe possit�ilFty ofi irnpfementing a caiinty-wide Poii District � Create ar�d host 1a Teaching the Teac�iers avorl<shops,
to support jobs ar>d ecor�omic growth introducing educatars to career oppor�unities
� Ci�eate a life sci�nce econoi��ic development strategy � Develop and irnplemer�t hi�h school i�ternsfii� �ro�ra�n
� Expand tfie outr�eacf�of tiie Procurement Tecf�+�ical
Assistance G�nter(c�avernment con4•actin�)�>royrarn to
151 new users in the region and 3(}� follow-up counseGng �-�=� ��'•� ��,,,,, , ..',l ° - ---
_ � -�,- ......�� �.
. - - - ~ • , ,_.sy_•„ -. '
sessions _—=�� _ _._ .;'- ", � --�' �-." �
� _ ,� -_�,�
�t�� � K }``,"'���� -�.
_ -� �:s',�
� } .. �� .. _� .�J
, J�t���,�. - �-,.�
GSI recruited Gater{}ill�r to li�e lh'ast Plains.I he distii�iulio�cenier is
exf>�ct�d la employ�O6-i5a peo�le.
f
�4F�i��l r�;+�I n 1[���1 kloS�j�-S�p k-)i'i{o)
- — — -- ---- y
— -- -- — 1�.�f���j#=F��-`�o�fflZ=)9���A�°}���ti���.�4°)1�
�9LIn�IC ��'[l�IG�
Advacate for business at every level of governrnen#.
a Advance local, state and federal iss�res affectinc� f�usinesses in Spo4tar7e and the - !
Inlarid Nor#hwesf :.� -_
_ '°-�'.: �
� Sec�ir�funding foi�medreal education and graduate medical eciuc�#ion, and suppot�t '
ti�e expansion af the Academic HeaPth Science Gent�r ��r
a Support new tan{ce��s anel military constr�iction prajects for Faircf�il�Amr Force Base .'�
� Oppose and assist in defeating fhe Community Bilf af Ric�hts measure
� Expar�d c�rass roots engagement and contir�ue ta ac�vance county-��ide stre�r7�lined ,
permifting -
GSI is advocalinc�for ihe basinc�of
Mcml�er§l1�p, �ve��ts atid ��n�ll 13usiriess tlie new 1<C-46A tankers at FairchiJd
Air Force Base.
Grow the membership base at�d drive new revenues to the orc�anization by a€fering
value-adc#ed r��em�iership invest���ent levels to existi�i� anci new members and � - �-. .- -- --
prov�dirlg events that inform anc!give them business-buildinc� opportciniti�s. ` �
�'�; ,~ �1��;
o Retain 93% ar rnare of exis#inc� irember investments , � �_ �.r.�
� Grow rr�em�iership investmenf#�y�1�i6,OQ0 fihro�.igh two account execufiues anr� a �
:,
s�rccessf��l board-fed initiative '�'
� Cond�ct 9D events/i7�eefinc�s invo3ving 8,500 participants,and increase - �-�, � .'
sponsorship revenue k�y 2% ,,'
a Host 2Q BIZStreet wor�4�shops generafinc�450 partici�ants : `�. �� �*�
� Co��duct Ag �xpo and Far,�n Forum, build Ag Week, increase ad a�evenue, and `` � �`.
Encrease Farm For��m program par�icipation ` �f�'
�
Maricetin & Corni�nurjications ��, Ic .
� -- - --
The rnarl<eRing and communications t�a� wili provide effective and tis��ely GS!works to develop, attract, ancl
communi�ations across all GSI constittaent groups and ci�partments witliin ihe retarn a hrr�hly edUCated and skr!!ed
organizafion. workfo�ce.
� Build relatior�ships with local and i�egional media as ar� irnpor�ant elei�ient in s ��
{C:��]11�C�:4ca�'IUl�i;�.14.'
carrying out organizational abjectiues � y �, rv,,, n�y r
� Activ�ly with}�a��tners, provida cor-ninunications and mai�ketiny suppo�t far all key "a���� 1"'��`���! ���'{"�`�i�'�� '
�riority projeuts ��ill[�1ror1��;� a,�fclP��o�o�;,fAl�1:ia)rloj
a Cor�tinue to implernei�#and manage hrai�d platform anci corizmun�cations taols
througflaut tlze organizatiora - ——
° SU�J�OI"iC IT1erYi�l@I'ShI�J�I'01M17t�1 Obf�CtIVU'S �JY fJl'pdUClfICJ c�fit� �c�U�lCkllilC� fIEVJ�iS� Pliotos courtesy 1'!SU Spo:�a�a,Easlem
l'Jashington Unlve�sity,and Caterpillar.
testi���or�ia�-style ad cam�aic�n
� Cam�nuni�ate specific 'Fietw�n on Investmeni' messaginy for var�io�fs audiences anci
G51 constituents
l�dminist��atiun & f=inance
Continue to develnp adi��inistraiive anci firiance proceclt�res 4i�3t best suppor i t��e
organization and its siaff
� Develop ar�n�ial I�uc#get ancl three�year�rojec4ions �C"E;ate �G��eihir�g �r�a��r
� Adei an aver�a�e of�25,000#o reserves each year
° U�9rade esffice equi�iner7t an a tf�r°ee year schedule �'�I�`t it.(_:1 r�,�
� rostet positi�re environmerrt for staff develoF�i��ent ����n� �
Q Adi��inister Boarc�af irustees role �I1C(11"�;iC?i"f:4'IC.Ci '< ,
/�
���)11��=��i I� I�3����� c����Ui����t��v�
+,n��;a�ra�JC�]a;t�� rnusrees
�'' �^,� � � ��' �� • �,�,( , , ' ` i�'��� t
'i �
r ,� , �� t.•�
; � , � s ,
.� � ,� �� �. � i�, .�
, i } `
j ,. _ ! �t
-.::7�;��, '� I �3�t?rf�fr�tt_ (�ra�ur�Ca•F�r�t�l 1 hi�r�i���at +;F3tPa�t��.�� IP,.r,.ci�fEtt�3��f3'k;�ir .f�'
.�I-4dA�idVl(t�iH3 I��iL1nt�Sttit���l��i't�r I ,�IN�$y�idi4=i�4 I;{�if�5"d�1(�t�f�7ii 1 r.rld,`I�i='h1°J ���I;ilaiEf.� EIIieAara k4arkAden
f�?•,��,i„e�+ �tJ::�r r�',:�?. �,;+ir*f P,7�1� tiy�r�:,rri�f�l-f:��C f.+.�i'�a�iN�4���1;r�:n i ��.,?tl,'Y. 1:r:,,t:� Ilo�'•et%Yi�fitr„��°?7 f3aacanNfllE"�^enls DCfE�gfneers
�'lr'�t n�ii.9�i�; t�(�{:]er:r, �r. ��,: r d{;>I I r,,tiets' r�,.� �
- - ' � °=� f._-== I'. .._ -i
;"r � -
�, 1 � .F�� � ��. ,� �,��� �� � . �
� � � �
�� � .F
� `.
� � _
_�
} �_ _ � . _i _ . �
, , ; . , � �
�, ..� ;,,� ■�, � _�
.iamieAitken JayAlfert �r.RodolfaAr€valo BarryBaker 7yroneBarbery Dave6lack KentGapulo �arrieC3�eshl�er
KREA?TVEKSKNFV Aslin-FrnchCa, EastamSYashfngfan BakerConsfnsction FdwardJones NAfH?ack Ka7ispelTriha! Travele�s
Unive�sify &�e��elapmenf FconomlcAvlhanty
�� �"' e",0.
�4 �'���"" �, ` � ���. '�� i��' `�� '�•' � t? . '��'� �ft`� .` ,rf '� ��i
' , . � ,r, . � e ,� � � ,,� , �
�'k. �� � . . , •-� �
� :, .— '
��� 1 • r:1`. .�
I_.� _—��; �. '�, . . �``: �,��� +��1' �"
MayorDavid Condon ElalneCnulure 1V.SlaceyCowles ScoltUielzen Phi1 DiPoEi �r.�Nlichael0unn Ezra Eckhardt Jon Eliassen
City o(Spokane Providence 7he Spokesman C!lffonLarsorrA7len LLP Norihti.es!Farm fVortheast Washington Slerling Benk Red Lion Viotels
HeafthCare Reviev CreditServices �soror Carparation
� � .\��t� Fei�. . . � ,�, - ' �., ' I ' ��
� � .� �� 1 � �. ' � � T
J � � P � �
_— r���.y'� '' .. 3 � �_,.. ' � � 5 � ��,
`�. � � lii ' '� /l '� a � - Is m 7 "
Linda Elkin Roger Flint Bill Gllberl Kristin Golt Ro6 Gragg Graig Hart Michelle Hege �Ttancy Holmes
US 8ank �C'H2d4Vi!!!,lnc. Deaconess Hospital 4Vendle Ford Nissan Cro�vn�/es!Realty Hart Capital Desautell-lega Avisla
lnrniti 5�zuk�' f.1anagemenf Gommunica['rons
" �, '� � �-� ...�.' "- r �:'r r �;�, �%�,�' ��r �, .�,
_ �� � � y� � 1 i 1
,"r � � ..�ti'=.' . � � � _. .�� ..y�"✓j/' . �, ���
� �i_ � �`��� � � i�. �'J�� e ' i �
br.ChrislineJohnson Fom dohnson 7wryJUdge l.arryKrauler Tyler 4aff�rty Mike�rSarzetta Dr.7hayne MoCulloh f'alricla Mcf�as
Communily Colfeges S7CU Noislart,lnc. Spokane Seven2 Aftek,Ina Gonraga llniversity KHQ TV
ol Spokane fnterna liona!Fu'rport
' .
r, A �' f`�
:' _. � �' �. �_„- i � + �
';. . � �� .r � .. J. �.
�F��._ 1!' S __�_ � J� ` 4 ,'� •.si� �e • . 1 �1ti
Cnmmissloner John i`doloney F6arcelo hlorales Scoft h7orrls Col.Brian Newberry 6renda Nicnhouse Dr,Br]an Pitcher Tom Qulgley
7odd M[elke lAolanay+0'Neir! Jubrlant Avisla Fairchifd Air Force ease SpoRane Symphony 1'Vashing�dn Sfafe Kiemle&Negaod
SpokaneCpuniy Nol+rslerStlerf�CC 4rchesl�a UniversirySpohane Company
� � €-.,` ---- i - ti �
�ti, + _°i��� "` �.— �;-�"
. � ' � r' • I^ � jI
+:- ' \: r� i ti' ' � d� - 'a :��` "
'� � �� . .��� t��. ��,�{ �� ` ' �� �!
� ��. �`"v �-a k ° � � � �� � � ;�'. '�
Coleen Quisznt�erry Dr.ShelleyAedinger Steve Ro6lnsoh Jan ScBmBdlkofer LlsaShaffer Ben Small PeterStanton Tim Sievens
Quisenbeny Spokane Publrc Spokarra Rock K 8 N Patii Snnf Genetics Cenlral Valley 1Vashing�on Trust 7ricrmph Composife
A?arke�ing E Oesign Schoors Producis Schoo!Dislrict 9ank Sysfems
�1 rT � �� .l� �� ( �. ., i - � f iir , ��J4�j f. ..\ — ' ^ " I
� � � �,� '•�F 4 I
I �' ,y•' \ �. m . ��.--y' ��t� ��. -� I� +� ,� �,� ' � . � '�
�. ..� �} ��--;" �ryf � � � . � ��� �
Larry Swailz ��,Deck Tay1o� Fdayor Tom Towey Mayor Tam Trulove Jim va�n Loban Sels Bruca 4lilliams MiSce Wilson Kyie 1'Jindhorn
L}drgConstarction 4NhihvorlhUniversity Cityoi&pakaneValley CilyolCheney Ar6orCres[ GeoFngineers,lna Piavidence }YalmartMarke[
4�ne Ceflars Heaflh Care OfBce
� t��i � fl � � �� A � A1 (�I
r ��a �� 1 ld �� �a�l iss���.�i� ��� � ��
M E ,r! �; i,��- .• � �,.� � t��'�.��w�
�� � � �� _ S o�can� ���' �._
�� �.� � _� . � . ,. � X�-,:
- � �, , � ,� �� - = Ir�c,��r ��������c,� � �,
� � � �, � � �
..� -���..�r i�iJ� {�I� � �5' � - ��-A�`j. .. -
J i ,y_� '-_��:�'r� ++�!� ����.1 �' — ' _ — 1�
� d�
� �
f• .i
r, •�'_',�+,✓ '�-~- �+ ' r
— . _ _ L •+:-�a-. r.._r°�„ �
i�� -!`�,!l�4��y �.� � � �� � �y ��,�•��'�. 4 +.r
� �:. � .�.� r .
- - r�
_. ,` _._- -- = . ; -
Jul 1 �
Y
2+D12 Ni a�n ufactu ri n �u rr�r�n it
�
wn�t:
You are in�ited to attend the 2012 Spokane Regional �Vlanufacturing Summit. Make�akuable
business connections and share ideas wi#h oti�er manufacturers, suppliers and industry
representatives. If you are a manufacturer, or work with marrufacturers in any capacity, thEs
�vent is for you!
The Summit will open with a luncheon covering the opportunies and challenges facing
manufacturers in Washingtan State. A netwar3cing reception and dinner will follaw the Summit,
featuring Brad Gile, ManageT of the Caterpillar(GAI� Spokane distribution center, and Dan
Flyn�n, who o�ersees CAT logistics in both �fart�h and Sout�America. Dan't miss it!
Afternoon workshops will co�er:
• Small business roundtable discussion
-What issues are affecting your t�usiness? �012 Sponsors�
• PoliGy issues affec#ing manufacturers ■
• Financing aptians and opportunities
• Lean manufacturing
+ Exporting Title Spansor:
• Mealth care and more... ` � �
�h��� Lunch Sponsor:
Tuesday, July 10 Association of Washington Business
Registration/Check-in: 12:00 pm
Luncheon; 12:30-2;00 pm Supparting Sponsors:
Workshops: 2.00-5:00 pm Air Washington/Spokane Community College,
Receptian & Dinner: 5:D0-7:30 pm Impact Wash�ngton, Pamiris,
WSU Applied Sciences Lab
IlVhere. E�ent S�onsars:
Centerplace Event Center Cd'A Metals, Haskins Steef Co., Inc.,
2426 iV. Discovery Place �'roto Technologies, Inc., Moss Adams,
Uni�ersity of P'hoenix-Warforce Solutions, Wagstaff
Applied Technologies, Washington Employers,
Regis�er Today: Wheatland Ban1c
Register far al�day or just the dinner:
http:/l�vents.greaterspokane.4rg.
� ��
�f?�.,,��?���1� - ���.���.����"'�I� E_af��1 ��.C�'�
� _,� , — !,, _ , �.. , , .�; ,, ���� !, _ .
�r .._`-�¢� c � , = ; '- . ' -
� '"
�� -, k k�' �N. , . � t , i� ;:- i k ��_ � �§� �.. � F �I1C.t�31`�-�Cll c1.'�;e;(.� ` ,,:
� ���^ 1 I� � J1.� t� � 7�.� ` y ... •! �� 1 � E _
'��7r . .�� s [ .-'�; . -_� � � � l l F `-
F �i+^°— �i i 1 �I �. } E �'^� 1 _� k I� �
� 1 / l
l 1_S} !t �` Y �1.. � -�.�7
r��'' � -``'� �� � ���.�i����`-�_t�-t� ,, �:��� ,�, -_ t-::��� 1 = ��. , .�� - { ,� ���;.
��{�'�� � ,s,��?sz � �� 4� ��E'� w#;" t — y '��� k � " ^ i '�4 �r, 1��� .' �r
�' '.�, � h_ } h� �` i��� °—� .�, .j.�;' -= �}�"� � 4�,�:'r��-�' r ` �°�°'��F�
"`'��i'3 i �j i`���` ��' �� �y '� +�' 01�r" �F:-. �a' �:� �� K �1 .�
,� {1 i ' -�c��' , i M , =��
��.- ' ,{ ti�� � ��' C"��J+,� 7if .,� � � dc�� �;
— _ _ _ -_ '.��, r `I� #�,'�J3':ii�}f.���� f�•"J� T�[� �� �f'� r - , �� r'
�.f.. S� -1�a,4 -s i�
. . -i.,._.�.:_ r Y _ . . 7
� � 2r��! G�u�rter, �a12
A quarterly p��bfication fram Greater 5pokane lncorpora3edT°'
Th� Economy Remains �c�Tt
"The econon�y remains sofit-locally arid natianally,"says new panelist Shaun�'L. Higgins, managinc� �rincipal of The Oxalis Group
LLC, and a longtime observer af the rE�ional econamy and d�mographics. "It's soiter now than I woulci have thouc�ht six months
aga, due to faciors such as declining c�rcrwth in China�nd continuing wsal<ness in Eiirope. When your largest traciing partners are
contracting, you have to be warried. Unfortunafiely, I don't see any�hing that�v�uld indicate a iiug� reviv�l any#ini�s4on."
Avista Chief Econamist Grant Farsyth agrees, "Tf�e ecanomy has definit�ly hit a sflfif �atct7."
"Ws are making prQgress,"says Sfeve Scranton,ehief investment officer for Washinaton Trust Banlc, "but it's s���ipar ca�pared
ta historica�stsndarcls. So to most peop4e, it stiU doesn't fee4 very good. �ut opin�ons about the econamy really d�penc! an which
inciuskry yau're in. My assessment overall is slow and steady witi� plenty of challenges ahead.°
Hnm� IPrices Stabilizing
"ihere are early signs af price stability in home sales,"says -
F'orsytfi. "We're finally star-�ing to see price increases, mostly �' °����='�C�'���1��� ° ' ' ����'�tT��
in line with i�flatioi�, but that's much better ti�an the decreases
we've seen for so Iang. Units soicl are up.I h�re's also an Year U��its f�o]Ear 5ales Rrice
increase ir�vof��me-alihough I don't I�now if it's permanenk." Sold Volume(U00) Auerage Median
2�10 Q2 9,530 �280,864 �'f83,571 '�64,945
lJs7its sold for second c�uaiier 20�2, compared to tl�e same��rioci 2011 Q2 1,172 �938,950 �169,752 953,000
irs 2011, are�p �.5%a. Dollar volume increassci more tl�an 7%, 2p12 az 1�225 �213,365 �1T4,975 �58,000
#he aver�ge s�le prices rose 2.6% ar�d tF�e median sale}�rice Source; Spoka��e Association of Realfors
increasecS 3.�%.
"We had soi�ze nice nu�nl�ers on a rel�tive basis,"says Seranton. Scranton says there is still a c�ues#ior� in his mind ai�aut how
"Ho�ne sal�s are bett�r than the seconcl quarter of 2011, I�ut#hey �1uch inventoiy is beinJ held oif the rnarl<et, locally ancf natio��ally,
still haven't came�ac4c to tiie levels of seconrf c�uarker�2010." because�eople ar�e underwatei�an il�eir homes or waitin�for
"7he affordauiliky irzdex remains prefty gr�od," accorclic�g to �f�eir hoii�e valu�to yo back ����laefar�e sellinc�. We is concerned
FI€ggir�s, "i�ut there aren't enough uuyers in the marlcet. Until we about the effect tf�is will have when these f7ousss show up or7 ihe
gei I�ac4<nn track wit�� �opulation and er��ployi��eEit c�rowtli sirnilar ma��kei as pr`ices increase. "Ar�ecdoi�lly, for every so9d sigrl that
to 2007, we are unlike�y to ses f�ousin� or retail sales increase I see going �i}�, it seerns ti�at iwo'for sale' si�r�s�a u�� shoi�ly
s�ibstantially, Hausinc�sales are li�<e!y to rernain soi�for at least after."
anoth�r year or so.°
Forsyth notes th�at fbreclosures in ow�area are still at a low level
in com�arison to 4he rest of the cauntry. li7 the U.S., one out af
every G5G homes�s in foreclosure, compareci to one in �,100 far
Spal�ane Co�u�4y antf one it�2,035 for Itootenai Cotinty.
��17a����.ic�f•in �ux°n,� ii� P�;rmit Val��ation�
I he number of permits is s�itl down sig��ificantly, but dollar ---
volumes are u� beca�+se of a few I�rg�e a�artment units stai�ting ������'�'� • _�f�jf�![IkA�i�Jl���
construction. -- -
Year Tota� permits 7otai Valua#ion
For all areas tivithin S,�olcane C�unty,Ehe nur7�k�er of�err7�it�in the 20'f 0 Q2 2,445 $128,30U,752
second quarker was down 5.4% from the same period last year, Za�'f Q2 2.3gg $129,289,921
bs�t valuations were up well over 100%. 2D12 Q2 2,244 �290,615,060
5ource: Ci1y of 5pokane, Gity of Spokane 1/a!ley,a�td
I he City of S�okane had#he biggest cJrop-8.2%, in the nc�mber Spokane County sdatisticalreports.
af permifs for seconci qua��ter this year campared fa 2i711, but - - --- - -
also the largest rise in ualuations at i 13,6%. overall act�vity is still very slow and there's no sign of lang-term
"The new home eonstruction marlce#is still pratty wealt. Banlcs
growti� in the pi�e�ine,"
cantimie to be refuctant to lencl ot7 lar�e hQUSing projects but are Higc�ins sounds a�ositive note for some real estate investors
more willing to���al<e loans €or construction of apartment units," and cSevelopers. "It's a great tir�ne for anyone who has capiial ar�d
says Ft�rsyth. doesn'# need an instant returr�on ii�ves#iYient to buy ai7d hui4ci
Scrantan r�otes, "hi tiie shart run it's a �'sce t�oost when there are relatively cf�e�p�y. S�ol<ane's long-ter��n picture is q��ite�oad, b���
larc�e coiistruetion projects, I�ut the r�umber of permits show that ifi remair�s somewliat wea4<for�the naxt two to ti�ree years."
Reta�l �al�� �hc�w MQdest (�rovuth
Reiail sales are inalcing "slow a��cl steaciy progress,"aceording to Forsyth notes t�tat the grawth rate in tzxabl�sales is rouc�hly
5cr�antan. the same as inflatiar3, "w��ich means lo�al governments are not
�aininc�ground oai revenue."
"Th�gaoci ne+�rs is tha�they are�tp 2.7% from second quarte��
last year,"Scranton says. "However;ihey are a bit sluggish tivhen Higgins paints out that "car sales hav� been up, but if you factor
comparsc�to the second quarter increase of 3.8% fi�om 2010 ta in 9nfla#ion a�ul the need to replace obsolete goo�ls, there's not
2011. I#hink this refiects cor�sumers being cautious i��causa�hey muci� otf�er growth in spendinc�. This is simpiy because the
are��ot seeing sic�r�ificant increases in their sal�rfes." dema�nd factors are larc�efy static."
Total sales far seconci quai�er rose 2,2% from last year.
� --- "!'m heari�rc�that sales are pretty volatile manth-to-i7ior7th,"says
�'���:��iT�'. � �yl�r:�,1�9�,��:�pl Ij;_`p�EYo��?;_�:.���.� Forsyth, "because consumers are higl�ly sensitive to econon�ic
Year Taxahle f�etai�7ra[ie Total '�axai7fe �7�WS. Also, national data suy�ests consumers have pulled bacl<
and this me�ns we wi�l pro��hly contin��e to see ar�ly n�odest
2010 Q2 $8�7,449,255 $9 675 454 759 ���°�h. 8ut we're t7at in free fall anymor�e. It's better than whai
2091 Q2 �815,609,672 $9,673,949,256 +Ne've sean ihe last iwo or ti�ree years, Any incraase is good
2012 Q2 ^�$37,344,647 $1,7'i0,713,728 n�'�$.��
sot,rce:spok�ne Cou,�ry
�nn�urn�r Pric� I��c��x ��rn�iri� �t�hfe
I he C�'I c{rop��eci€airly significar�tly, frarn 3.5%to 1,5% irorn
rc�o���:�!�iir.arl{��'�,��,Iti�k-�;c
secand c�uarYer 2CY�3 i io 20�2.
Year CPI Annual Perceiat Chanye
"Most ecanoi�iists expect tf�e inflation rate ta stay relatively low-
ir�ihe 1.5 to 'i.8% rang�-rnaybe lower,"says Higgins. "However, 2Q1fl Q2 U.51°!0
ti�e dev�stating elrQUgf�t, par�ticularly ir� tl�e Nticiwest, will meai� 2019 Q2 3.�t7%
gi�ocery inflafion, es�ecialiy ior��e�and csther meafs�h�at are 2012 Q2 1.52%
corr� dependent, anti tfie cost of the eth�nol�oin� ir�to o�ir Socace: U.S. sureau af LaborSt�tistics
- � _.
�asofine will I<i�k��p tf�ai com;�onent of automative f�rel prices."
dollars are goin� into tax-iree food sales, leaving less to s��enc�
Forsyth a�r�es. "A�rice shocl< is con7ing sonn on foocl F�rices. an taxaF�le iten�s.°
7here has beet� a tt�emeradaus spil<e ii�wf�eat ar�c!cot n prices ar��l
these will mal<e their-way ir�to cai7surner#ood ��rices fairiy quick#y. "Inflaiion is eurr��ntly not an iss��e over�all,'"says Scr�nfarl, "l�ui
In ac�dition,ihis is likely to alter taxahle sales as inore cansui7ier food �rices aE�E r�ain� up. Infiation doesn't feel low to�eople whQ
s��end a hic�her percentac�e of their incame on groceries,"
��__ — ---- - --- --
��_ _�T�- - �--�_- - - -------- - _-" �
- -- '` _
�mploym�r�� ��W�l� �c�nfi�ita��c� [�isappoin�
"Spo1<ane and I�oat�nai Co�mty have not seen sic�nifrcai7t "If you loolc at mai9<ets where thE top ten industries are a simiEar
employnient growth since November 2009," says Forsyth. mix to Spokane,th�emp2oyi�ient picture in�hose marl4�ts is�Iso
"f�.aotena9, however, is showir�g more�rawth tt7an Spol<ane." very sir7ii9ar," says Higc�ins.
Tf�e unemployment ra#e contiraues#a drap, frnm�.2% in second '"I have two indicators that I wa#ch clasely," says Tweedy, "the
quarter 2�1 t to th�curre�it 8.8%, hut this Ps d�i�to a decrease of fir�st is our business survey that includes payroll in€orma�ion.7�7is
�,224 people in the labor force over the same period last year. shows that�rivate business employn7ent is u�an�f I am very
encouraged by that. Even though#here's an averall gain in the
�oug Tweedy, r�gional econor�iis#, Washingtoz�State Labor private sec�or,the drag on emplayrner�t is the loss of government
Marl<et&�coi7omic Analysis, notes tf�at our reyion gained 7,QOD jahs."
�eaAle v�rho came here loolcine� for tivorl<av�r th�past couple of
years, "We haE+e been losTra�these people as ti�ey rnove E�ael:or "I he otl�er indicatoi�I watch,°continues Tweedy, "is a lear�rnc�
find joLs elsedl�t7ere, wlvch lowers tl�e ur3empfnyi3zei7t rate, t�ut it iradicator—the i7ui7iber of initial clairsis for un�mplay���ent
doesn't ir7dicaie any iricrease in the�iumber of jo�s.'" insurance, These ha�e trended downward for tf7e last 16 n�or�ths
and they are in line with ti�e���miber ot claims we had prior to the
"i he a�ly reason our�inem�layment numlaers ar�e falling is tl�at recess'son."
there are less people in ti�e labor fores," s�ys Scranton. "TE�is is
what peo�sle find most discouraging out�sf all the com��onenfis of "We have sail7e(�ositive chang�es cominc�onlir�e including
ihe eco�rornic picture." the opening of the Gater�aillar distribi�tion cer�tei',the Med'scal
Schoo!expansion and yrowtli af Fait'c17iIcS,° says Tweecfy, "These
The nur7iber of those ernplayeti declir�ed t�y 273 frc�m seconcl developments are�oing to be bigger than people realize."
quatter last year.
"Businesses ar�sts'll pretty cautious," says Forsyti�, t�eca�fse
fihey over-hired �ariar to the recession.They don't want to hira
and lay offi wor4cers i�#hiiigs change, sp they riiay use temporary
em�loyees, especially sr��all b�rsinesses. They won't i7iake hig
changes Lintil �ongr�ess deals with tY�e tipcaming fiscal cliff.°
. . e . � .1'�J!a�rf±��
r_
_ ' . �..n - . . a�.
- ���.
Year 5pokane County Ciuifian Labor Force Spokane County Washington State Ur�iked States
�otal �mployed Uneinpfoyed Unemployment Rate Llnemployment Rate Unemplayment Rate
2010 Q2 236,G6Q 213,96� 22,70Q 9.6% 9.7°/a 9.5%
2011 Q2 232,497 211,�53 21,343 9.2% 9.2% 8.�°10
2012 Q2 231,273 �10,8$0 20,393 8.$°ta 8.2% 8.0%
Source:Washingtott State Ea7ploymer�t 5ecerrrtyDepar#ment;U.S.Bu�eauoiLaborStatistics
Pc��itiv� �l�w� from the Air�car�
"�ven thou�#i capacity is down, travef response has b�en '"Th�air°{�ort is a very robust jah site and stimulator of the
increcl#t�le iri t�rms of laad factors,"sa�+s Todd Woodard, Director econom�r,"says Woodard. °Th�r�is�25 inillion in capital prajecis
of Marketinc�ar:d P�d�liG Pelatior�s, S�ol<ar�e lnternatianal Aiipor�. undei�rv�y at the airport, includiE�g lai7d purchases, a new aircraft
�-escue/firefic�l�ting f��eilding in desi�n, a snow rernoval eq�ripmerit
"Overall, the�I�nes ar�more iul!fhan they have I�een in the buildinc� uncier const+�uciion, �yarag� fic�hting praject,etc�
E�ast.I h�recen�iy-adcled tli°srd cfaily Delta flic�ht fa Iv�inr7ea��olis The air°�or-t is also purehasing eight pieces o�sr�aw removaS
has also been f�iil, whicf�is great.'" equipmen�costing abolii�h�lf millian cfollat-s."
I h�airpori had 746,9G1 #otal passer�gsrs in tl7e s�cond quai�rei�,�
1.F3°fo decre�se over 2011's 76a,£349. Ti�is is in spite of a double- �°x°����r�lli�(�i�i�f���i�.11/rtljl,���a1i��,���:f�i��kf�;
d�git�lecrease in�asser�ger seats y�a��-to-cSate. ��1r 7otal Total Tot�l Cargo
Operatior�s Passengers {tons)
Ca��r�o continues to k�e stron�, monih aiier n�onth,wiih second
c�uarter car�p up�0°l ove��last yeai;This is ever��a�ar�rob�rst 20�� Q2 2Q,5�1 782,635 19,7b5.2
than ti�e 24% increase for ft�e first c��farter. Ml�ch of the carc�o 20�� Q� 19,533 760,849 19,48�.1
ina�ease ti�is year is fror7i UI�S, tivhieh is hancllir�g more post ofifice �a�2 Q2 "i8,14'i 746,�61 '1S,{171.2
car�o due fn Consoliclatiotis in tl�e U.S. post�l service. SotJrce:�j�okana lr�terrzatronaf Airport
� -- -_,_ _u _ -,_ _ --�- �---_--�J^-- -��� - -_ ^ ' ' _��'l
Wooclard poinls to tl�e recent annt�uncement af direct air sen+ice to F-�onol�lu as an exciting developr��a��� for Spolcane. "Allegiant is,
I believe,the most profitable airiine iai the U.S., tivith a very special r�ici�e market.They are incredibly well run and very stic�essful. li's
been a four or five-year process to get snto their network. We ar��nticipatinc�that ather ex{�ansfons and ro�rtes will be corning soar�."
�Ic�sinc� '��f�o�ac�l��i� ai��l �us�ruatioi��
�1o�ig�"weec�y.ihe wage mix for Spol<ane is ci7anging. We are Insing entry-level jobs in retail ai7d feisure&haspitaliky, par�tly d��e ta
stru�tural chan�es such�s self-checl<o�rt arid automation. Esut we ar�e yaininc,�niici- arzci upper-level jobs in#f�e f�,ur diversified sectors
thal f�ave been leadin�a�n�economy: advanceci manu#acturing; health care; fin�ncial &insur�nce; and professional, scientific&
technicaE. So, o��arall, w�ges are going up.
5feve�cr�r�toe5: Refinancing contii�ues to be tfire rnajority of mor�tgac��lending because of#he very low rates. llltimate4y,this will
improve the ecQnomy beca�ise lower€�ion#h1y markgac�e�ay+nents leave rrroi�e rnoney far hausehald spending thai will stimulate the
locai economy.
C'�ra��f�f arsYti7:The federa#gavernment has changed the accaunting �ules for pension fur�ding. State and local Jovernrnents will have
to begii� using much more realis4ic assl�rnptions al�out t��eir ciisco�rnt rate ar assui7�ed rate of reiurr�.Tf�e neev r�iles will be p}�ased in
star�ing in 2013 anci it's yoing to�e a big c�eal. Many state and loGal�ensions are underf�mded even ��iih the optimistic assumptions.
The diffierence between assui7iir�� a 5f/ rate of return versus an 8% ��eturn is iiuge, and toially changes#he funda`r�g requi�ements,
The cl�aice is to aslc for rnuch hic�ger eontributions f��on�thase cur��ently payir,g into the pensia�7 or to c�it benefits in orrler ta I�eap tiie
pension solvent, It's going to be a ve�y���n�leasant debate and process to fix.
�I�adiri 1 ii�c�ins: We need to c{o a zero-l�ased ana�ysis of aur area's sfrengths ii1 or�der to have hiyhly s�ecific targets for tiie types oi
businesses w�are most lilcely to recrui�. For instance, we are one of the safest��laces in America in terma of c��o�raphy, climat�ar�d
nat�iraf disasters.This is a huse advar7iac�e for arc��iving businesses anci other iridustries that w�co�Ad r�cruit—not j��sf nationally, i�ut
g�obally,
.�
j.�.�,��„t,�,,�Ei,t�,
,�,,� ,.
Barometer ri�ril�r:
Dek�t�'�e Rauen,Leg:.nd�.ry Hil'�sGommun'c��ions
/ �; A �+ �+yy���7
�p��� .CitYit]A�JVA@1�1
�� titi',�s�3�ncrouuN�1'��is�i1'
star[same[hing�i�
D1�3 n55°I71b'°d 6y Li12 Ir151i1U[B IOf PuU'��:C R ECOflOrrilC
Ana�ysfs flC Eastern 4�'ash;nc�lon University
Conn�ct, [��ive, Advaca�e i
+ �-�� I. �
� � �`� � �rl�t;t���:G ;�
ki t� E e � �'�,,, Greater�S��alcane Incor•par�tecE �`������ � .
� � d� A.. ' ; ~-
��r�� '��'�; � � Sa1 W. Riveisid�Av�.� Suile�104 h� � ",,
2 yo
°�'q�,ei��ry�� l ' Spo4cane, Wf�9�J20� � �Il[,{���1()y"��It:�t.� �:' ..
�II ��:�'����� �;r'� �t�� 3oJ.�2�.•a3�3 c�reaters��akane.org Create Sarnethir�c�Greater
2� �d:.,�_
r � 3(. � I l ;� 1 �! ���, ��C���C'��A"��i�Lr�a IC�LiL��:�:�Cn l
^�} )� 4 i � , - _ [���`�C4X�Cr����1�������CXf
• .
� " p r:�',,;�" - -�-;,. , r -
�
�,.� �� �' h �`.
�,�` - `` d�-�` , _ '
� "-�'�-.`°' �' r '� �
���,'..��..�,�� ,� `'�`t�,.r. ' ,'
, ; + �� 4� ',I� - �
��4 " ,.1�. � �' M;�,+'� �-..��f' --' �
a '� -, .� 1
;:�5� �' , . � ' �': , ,w
y�� � �� , - i
�
,, , .
� � �" �
- • ,.
`'`' � 1' � +�~ . -
' t, \
J �, R��� . .��- "�
�'' +� - r�' __. ,����lllr._ � �
_- E`�
°We have been an active member o(
a GSI�nd Eastern Washirrgton PrAC for
������ ���� several yea�s and can atfest that the
� programs,seminars and conferences
s available have been invaluabfe in secur-
���I���� ����� �}� r"ng GSA and V'A profects in our region."
� I� -Randy Cameron,
8aker Construction&Develppmenf
GOVernr�er�t �
1]ici voii K�,ow.
���������� • Washington State had th�
highest amount ot
Abo�it CSI's �over�itiieiit Contractinc� Proc�r�rTi P"i',�C subcontracting dollars
Want to se11 to the government, b�it are overwh�lm�d by registra#ions aw�rded in 201i, totaling more
and certifications? Woufd you like guidance a�solicitations ar than$9$ million.
bidding? Eastem Washingtan Procure�rnent Technica9 Assistance
Center(PTAC)works to maximize the number of capable U.S, • The iederal govemm�nt is
com�anies participat'mg in the go�ernment marketpface by the largest purchaser of
prouiding your�iusiness with an understanding of the raq���rernents goods and services in the
and marketing 'know-how to do business with the gov�rnment. United States, from janitorial
prociuc#s and serviees ta
I'IA�'; t?ro�icles F'F�l-:l�Ilssis#ar��e military construction projects
•Government contrackinc� 1�11 classes and more.
• �nterpretation of soficitations
P Assistance with government registrations and certifications e .
+ Marketing assistance to help determine key marl<ets
1!l��� n .. e e
• Specifications, skandards and drawin�s -
•All other�reas of selfinc�to#he go�ernment �C%�o1�n���Cc�i�pE:>;Ea.�,;
rS�o�J) (�'r'�''� �i���niu�(0,3
O��r service area covers 12 counties:Adams,Asotin, Douglas, Ferry, ������a��ay�o�Re:X�°.1� l���o�o��a o • a
Garfield, Grant, Lincoln, Okanogan, Pend Oreille, Stevens, Spokane,
and Wiiitman. Oiir professional stafi works with businesses of ail -
sizes and aeross nearly every industry.
t.- .�
F1L57EFiN t"lASHIM1GTO� , ���
r�L� ����.
Gre�te Something C�r+�ater �r�a���S�;�f,�,��pr�r�xE� v-�`� ,..
Y�� I �
(�.1�1�A-�ai�.lit:f�s�,i�il��=lit<iio��� ` _
��- -� � I+�]E�I��f�a+il�l�toa;�rtkMC=�l�l��ti������:IIII i�F�I��=�,-=,f,'tarr'`�1i��Et��>i��o�1n7
'�i-j(�%lEN'��rh�Arfl(=1eLa1l4��A�"/�°1F���r1(o�ll�!��±()�?i�p)����°111V�Ilbti{tl�:lilr'��m�g}
���'a1�r�;�i[=II�Vo�r�t=ldMtt?.t=�=sl��ii�it:!�+I�'lil'iISPl.t��,lfy�:?�si�t+' �
_t'�` ��, . �
What Does t}�is Mear7 t�YOUl� �trsi��ess? 5#ay Rrtformeti �
• We'll help you e�xplore potential new markets#or yaur . Sign up to receive the PTAC e-newsleiter, a monthly
products and seruices. update on government contracting news, classes and
other timely information t�o hel,�yaur business.
• We'll assist you in finding specifications,standards
arad drawings necessary for soliciiations and help you = Find PTAC:
understar�d contract clauses,terms, definitions and -on ti�e web at gsiptac.orc�
rsquirements. -on Twitter at twitter.comlEWA_PTAC
-on Facebook at faeebook.comlWA.I�TAC
+ Our professional staff provide quality procurementf
contracting training classes and conferences. . For additaonal resaurces and information you ean visif
washingtonptac.org.
• We affer small group meetings with agency and prime
contrac#or purchasing representatives.
• Our customized software program is availabl�to
you, providing comprehensive bid and pro�aosal
oppartunities.
• You'll me�t other business owners and hav�potential
fo develop future i�usiness relatioa7ships.
GSI li7vite�You to Cet Ir�volveti
We invite you to be informed and get involved in ways
that help us create opportunities for your business.
f�TAC We��si#e—Cheek out aur PTAC website:
gsiptac.org, You'll find a wealkh of infprmatior�!
Glasses—Attend some of our�overnment contracting �ant to Know More?
classes—fis#ed under PTAC Events on the website.
For rnore inforn�ation ar d�t�ils on f7o�r�yo�+can��et
Videos--Take a loak at some of the PTAC videos for ir�uolveci, cont,ct Leslie Miller, Casterr�Wasf�inc�tas� PTAC
perspectives dram aur award-winnang PTAC clients, �'�1�i��c�er at 50�J-321-3�4f pr Imilfert±greaters�ol�ar�e.or�.
which you'll also find on our website.
Une-o�i-Or�e—Give us a ca11 and set up a time to meet, ��n��C L, Ur�Ue, f��U�CaI'�
and learn how we can help your busir�ess.
Greater 5pofcane Incorpor�ted
L�; �
F01 VV. ftf��erside Ave., Suiie 1Dd
Spokane,WA 9J2q1
�`�r��3t�I,��t. � '` � 56�J.G?�.�1393 gre�ters}�ol;arie.orc�
� ����1!✓ �r� y.', j
� Piioto�ra�>liy cflurtesy Eieautiful f'iioto Sfud��o and C7re�.��o�ovan
�i7�,r�1"�)C)f'�?'l"�;C� ` �r" ��.