The URL can be used to link to this page

2012, 12-11 Regular Meeting AGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING FORMAL FORMAT MEETING Tuesday,December 11,2012 6:00 p.m. Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers 11707 E Sprague Avenue Council Requests Please Silence Your Cell Phones During Council Meeting CALL TO ORDER: INVOCATION: Pastor Craig Smart,Valleypoint Church PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: ROLL CALL: APPROVAL OF AGENDA: INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: Recognition of Outgoing Planning Commissioner Rustin Hall Legislative Update fi^om Briahna Taylor COMMITTEE,BOARD,LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS: Economic Development Ad Hoc Committee Final Report—Councilmember Wick MAYOR'S REPORT: PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those on this agenda as action items. (Action items include public hearings, and those items under NEW BUSINESS. Public Comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.) When you come to the podium, please state your name and address for the record and limit remarks to three minutes. 1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. a. Approval of the following claim vouchers: VOUCHER LIST DATE VOUCHER NUMBERS; TOTAL AMOUNT 11/09/2012 27499-27525; 27544 $163,52813 ll/09/2012 27526-27543; ll05120012; ll08120075 $801,13117 ll/16/2012 5532-5535 $2,076.00 ll/16/2012 17545-27591 $678,83318 ll/20/2012 4142-4145; 27592 $60,59023 ll/21/2012 27593-27613 $122,504.62 11/21/2012 27614-27667 $689,966.61 ll/29/2012 27668-27669 $15,737.00 ll/30/2012 27670-27699; ll29120018; 130120022 $1,869,285.57 GRAND TOTAL $4,403,652.51 b. Approval of Payroll for period ending November 15, 2012: $281,961.84 c. Approval of Payroll for period ending November 30, 2012: $381,529.46 d. Approval of Minutes of November 13, 2012 Council Formal Format Meeting Council Agenda 12-11-12 Formal Format Meeting Page 1 of 2 e. Approval of Resolution 12-011 New Position Classifications £ Approval of Argonne Road Safety Proj ect Memorandum of Understanding with Millwood NEW BUSINESS: 2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 12-028 Multi-Family Regulations—Mike Basinger [public comment] 3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 12-029 Commercial Vehicles (Trucks)—Cary Driskell [public comment] 4.Proposed Resolution 12-012 Accepting Restoration Plan of the Shoreline Master Program—Lori Barlow [public comment] 5.Proposed Resolution 12-013: Master List Commercial Vehicle Routes—Cary Driskell [public comment] 6.Proposed Resolution 12-014: Amending Fees for 2013 —Mark Calhoun [public comment] 7. Motion Consideration: Lodging Tax Allocation of Funds—Mark Calhoun [public comment] 8. Motion Consideration: Street Maintenance Contract Renewal—Eric Guth [public comment] 9. Motion Consideration: Street Sweeping Contract Renewal—Eric Guth [public comment] 10. Motion Consideration: Mayoral Appointments of Councilmembers to Committees -Mayor Towey [public comment] ll. Motion Consideration: Mayoral Appointments to Lodging Tax Advisory Committee -Mayor Towey [public comment] 12. Motion Consideration: Mayoral Appointments to Planning Commission—Mayor Towey [public comment 13. Motion Consideration: Holiday Closure—John Whitehead [public comment] PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those on this agenda as action items. (Action items include public hearings, and those items under NEW BUSINESS. Public Comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.) When you come to the podium, please state your name and address for the record and limit remarks to three minutes. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: 14. Advance Agenda—Mayor Towey INFORMATION ONLY(will not be reported or discussed): 15. Quick Response Safety Grant Program CITY MANAGER COMMENTS 16.EXECUTIVE SESSION: Review Performance of Public Employee [RCW 42.30110(1)(g)] ADJOURNMENT General MeetinQ Schedule(meeting schedule is always subject to change) Regular Council meetings are generally held every Tuesday beginning at 6:00 p.m. The Formal meeting farmats are generally held the 2nd and 4`h Tuesdavs. Formal meeting have time allocated for general public comments as well as comments after each action item. The Study Session formats(the less formal meeting) are generally held the ls` 3ra and 5`h Tuesda,� Study Session formats DO NOT have time allocated for general public comments; but if action items are included, comments are permitted after those specific action items. NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical,hearing, or other impairments, please contact the City Clerk at (509)921-1000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made. Council Agenda 12-11-12 Formal Format Meeting Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 11, 2012 Department DirectorApproval: ❑ Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information � admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Legislative Agenda Update GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: November 2, 2012, Lobbyist Briahna Taylor met with Council and other local officials concerning the Sullivan Bridge Project. Ms. Taylor will brief Council tonight on current and pending legislative issues. OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: ATTACHMENTS Council's 2011-2013 Legislative Agenda, last updated January 17, 2012 Sp�oll�a.ne Valley� 20l l-l3 Le�islative A�enda The following is the City of Spokane Valley's 20ll-2013 legislative agenda, adopted by Council October 26, 2010; amended November 16,2010; December 28,2010; October 25, 2011; and January 17, 2012: Princinle Items of Interest: Budget Requests: 1. Support Funding for Sullivan Bridge Replacement. Constructed in 1951, the Sullivan Bridge carries approximately 26,000 vehicles daily with a very high truck volume of about 24%. The Sullivan Road West Bridge is a part of a principal north/south transportation corridor in our City. Serving the southbound traffic as one of two bridges crossing the Spokane River at that location, the bridge links a primary industrial area with the City's major retail and commercial areas to the south, and provides critical access to I-90, the region's only Interstate highway. A 2010 inspection determined the bridge's Sufficiency Rating to be 24.14 out of a potential score of 100, and a subsequent load rating analysis rated the bridge as Structurally Deficient. A Notice of Funding Availability for TIGER Discretionary Grants (TIGER III) was published August 12, 20ll. The City of Spokane Valley applied for but was not awarded any of these funds. The current estimated cost of the project is $19.7 million. Spokane Valley received $8 million in Federal BR(Bridge Replacement) funds, and another $2 million in state grant funds from FMSIB (Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board), leaving a need of$9.7 million to complete the project. 2. Seek Funding to Acquire Park Land Adjacent to Park Road Pool and Centennial Middle School. The City of Spokane Valley has a population of 89,440 people, but only 172 acres of public parks— drastically below the 6.25-10.5 acres/1,000 population(559-938 acres) specified in the City Parks Master Plan. In the past, Spokane Valley has successfully partnered with the State Legislature to acquire and develop Greenacres Park, adjacent to Central Valley School District's future elementary school. A similar opportunity presents itself with Park Road Pool. The City requests $300,000 in funding to acquire land adjacent to Park Road Pool for a park near Centennial Middle School. Policy Requests: 1. Protect the state shared revenues the City receives. The City of Spokane Valley encourages the state to preserve local state-shared revenues. During the 20ll Legislative Session, these funds were cut 3.4%. Moving forward, the City requests that the funds remain intact. These funds include the Liquor Excise Tax Account, Liquor Revolving Account, Streamlined Sales Tax Mitigation, Municipal Criminal Justice Assistance Account, and City-County Assistance Account. 2. Additional Lien Authority to Recoup Code Enforcement Costs. The City of Spokane Valley seeks legislation to provide cities with additional tools to recoup costs for enforcing code compliance when a court order is issued and a city performs the abatement itself or through a contractor. This is anticipated to include enacting lien authority similar to a tax lien,including the authority to execute such a lien in the following year. Page 1 of 2 3. State Environmental Policy Act—Amend Certain Requirements Imposed by State Law. The City supports amending SEPA requirements to make the process less duplicative. SEPA thresholds to consider: (1) Convert some discretionary SEPA exemptions to categorically exempt (2) Raise the level of SEPA exemptions across the board; (3) Make most actions within UGAs categorically exempt with discretion given to cities; (4) Eliminate excessive costs associated with providing notice for every Determination of Non-signi�cance and Mitigated Determination of Non-Signi�cance application. 4. Support the Association of Washington Cities'legislative agenda items that serve the best interests of the City of Spokane Valley. Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 11, 2012 Department Director Approval: ❑ Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information � admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Economic Development Ad Hoc Committee Final Report GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Discussion BACKGROUND: On March 20, 2012, City Council approved a motion to form an Economic Development Ad Hoc Committee to research short and long-term goals to help grow the Spokane Valley economy. At the April 24, 2012 Council Meeting, a motion was passed to confirm the Mayoral Appointments made by Mayor Towey. The Committee consisted of the following: Councilmembers Brenda Grassel and Ben Wick; Citizens Ben Small, Grant Person and Robin Toth; Tourism Representatives Keith Backsen, Julie Cohen and Erin Gurtel; Business Representatives John Miller, Wayne Frost and John Guarisco; and Youth Members Ben Baker and Josh Ramsey. The Committee met with various business stakeholder groups to gather information and ideas for economic development in the City of Spokane Valley. A total of twelve meetings were held between May 16, 2012 and November 8, 2012. The Committee Report is ready to present to Council. OPTIONS: Council Discretion RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Council Discussion BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A STAFF/COUNCIL CONTACT: Mike Jackson, John Hohman, Councilmembers Wick and Grassel ATTACHMENTS: Economic Development Ad Hoc Committee Report and PowerPoint Presentation City of Spokane Valley Economic D evelo ment p Committee Final Report to City Council CITl' QF � �� H: Councilmember Ben Wick, Chair 12/11/2012 Committee Members On March 20, 2012, City Council approved a motion to form an Economic Development Ad Hoc Committee to research short and long-term goals and projects to help grow the Spokane Valley economy. At the April 24, 2012 Council Meeting, a motion was passed to confirm the Mayoral Appointments made by Mayor Towey. The Committee consisted of the following individuals: Citizens Ben Small, Grant Person and Robin Toth; Tourism Representatives Keith Backsen, Julie Cohen and Erin Gurtel; Business Representatives John Miller, Wayne Frost and John Guarisco; Youth Members Ben Baker and Josh Ramsey; and Councilmembers Brenda Grassel and Ben Wick. Committees Purpose The goal of the Economic Development Committee was to hear from members of the community gathering information and ideas about projects and/or improvements that could benefit economic development in Spokane Valley, including: • Physical infrastructure improvements such as street and road improvements, signage, park and recreation facilities and other public or private enhancements. • Program and services infrastructure such as safe community, permitting services, code enforcement, park maintenance, street maintenance, etc. • Branding and "key messages" and other community building programs to help identify and promote the City of Spokane Valley as a great place to live and work. The Process The Committee began the process by identifying categories of community representatives that are currently working on economic development within Spokane Valley, as well as areas previously discussed for potential economic development. Those individuals and groups were identified as representatives in designated categories and defined as Community Stakeholders. In order to help prepare the Stakeholder Groups, the Committee provided the following questions and asked that each group come prepared to give a 15-minute presentation. 1. What does the Spokane Valley area currently offer for your group? 2. What challenges/opportunities do you have? 3. What do you need to expand? 4. How are your goals going to increase jobs/private investment? 5. How can we help? The Committee then dedicated separate meetings to focus on each Stakeholder Group. A total of twelve meetings were held between May 16 and November 8, 2012. Stakeholder Groups and representatives interviewed were: Sports Eric Sawyer, Spokane Regional Sports Commission Phil Champlin, HUB Sports Complex Page � 1 Hospitalitv Phil Costello, Washington Restaurant Association Toni Hansen and Jody Sander, Spokane Hotel/Motel Association Cheryl Kilday, Visit Spokane River Andy Dunau, Spokane River Forum Chris Guidotti, Washington State Parks Business Development Nancy Holmes, Greater Spokane Valley Chamber Robin Toth, Greater Spokane Incorporated Workforce Development Mark Mattke, Spokane Area Workforce Development Council Ben Small, Central Valley School District Citv of Spokane Vallev's Zonin�and Develoqment Codes Overview Scott Kuhta, Planning Manager Lori Barlow, Senior Planner Mike Basinger, Senior Planner Local Develoqers Jodi Traeger, Pinecroft Business Park Dennis Crapo, Diamond Rock Construction Ken Tupper, L and L Homes Miscellaneous Nancy Ledeboer, Spokane County Library District Steve Worley, City of Spokane Valley Senior Engineer, Capital Improvement Projects Feedback Received Throughout the process the Committee received enthusiastic feedback and excitement for helping spur economic development within Spokane Valley. The following goals and projects were brought up in discussions with the Stakeholders: .sHC�R�-�E�M c�c�ALSj��a��T.�° • Participate as a regional tourism partner • Promote the "free parking" benefits of doing business in the City of Spokane Valley (CSV) • Identify reasons for people to live and do business in the CSV • Promote CSV as a business friendly community • Promote access to the Spokane River • Continue to support and attend Greater Spokane Valley Chamber sponsored events • Provide continued funding for CSV's economic development partners • Support the Chamber's entrepreneurial training classes • Implement a Certified Sites Program Page � 2 • Create and promote a partnership with the Spokane Area Workforce Development Council to develop a CSV presence • Create educational outreach on activities, changes, and programs the City is involved in • Collaborate with Spokane Transit Authority more actively in route decisions • Continue to provide funding for the HUB and Regional Sports Commission • Review the Regional Sports Commission Project Sports 2012 Vision Team Study (estimated to be released in October) • Investigate the possibility of branding CSV as the "amateur and youth sports capital" • Investigate options for development project sureties currently allowed �o1v�-��1� cc��sf��Cr,� • Create a vision for CSV—What do we want to be? • Revise the funding process for economic development agencies and lodging tax recipients • Develop a softball/baseball complex • Develop a championship golf course • Develop a cross country course • Develop an ice complex • Expansion of the HUB • Enhance existing sports facilities (i.e. soccer fields at Plante's Ferry Park) • Develop an indoor aquatic complex • Recruit"destination" businesses • More outdoor activities (Randall Survey states 70% of visitors would like more outdoor activities) • Attract a culinary school • Develop plans for street beautification/lighting/signage within the CSV • Support/promote a "Buy Local" Program • Create a location in the CSV that has a great vibe or would be considered a neighborhood destination (like Sherman Avenue in Coeur d'Alene or downtown Spokane) • Develop districts or zones within the CSV that could provide marketing, self-identity and/or grant opportunities • Participate in the Regional Wayfinding and Gateway Signage Program • Create more biking trails • Develop a river park with trails • Promote the Spokane River as a regional/national whitewater and fishing attraction • Help advocate/connect with funding for river enhancements • Partner to help develop a "regional trails" marketing program (i.e. adding pedestrian trails to the www.trails.com website) • Develop enhanced river access at Sullivan Park as part of the Sullivan Bridge replacement project • Provide leadership to develop a regional or Valley trails system website (possibly patterned after the water trail website) • Improve the trail access point at Mission Avenue • Potential land swap for Sullivan Park Land currently owned by the State of Washington • Develop a trail on both sides of the river to allow for a loop within our corridor • Increase the amount of local parks throughout the CSV • Connect current assets to global search engines, parks, trails, river, etc. • Develop a plan for marketing the Spokane River as a destination point Page � 3 • Promote the development of a restaurant along the Spokane River • Work to renew the agreement between Washington State and the individual cities for river access (the current agreement was signed by the county prior to incorporation) • Determine ownership and funding for capital improvement costs to the Centennial Trail • Implement a Port District • Support educational capital requests to Olympia for better work force development opportunities (example: the next phase of Spokane Valley Tech School) • Create an annexation process for adding areas or parcels into the City • Champion the Bridging the Valley Project • Add a signal light at Pines/Mirabeau Parkway • Create/define a City Center • City Hall Recommendations Knowing that resources are limited and wanting to help focus the City of Spokane Valley's efforts, the Committee puts forth the following recommendations for goals/projects that could make the most direct impact. sH��T-TER�1 �OALS/PRO�E��S Participate as a regional tourism partner. Tourism is a large part of our economy and provides our region with funding from citizens outside of our direct jurisdiction. Discussions with stakeholders suggest that we need more communication and collaboration between the City leadership and other agencies. Promote the City of Spokane Valley as a business friendly community. Throughout the discussions the Committee discovered that there are a lot of misunderstanding and misconceptions surrounding the City of Spokane Valley Operations, particularly in the permitting process. Provide funding for economic development partners including: Greater Spokane Incorporated, Visit Spokane, Spokane Valley Regional Chamber of Commerce, Regional Sports Commission. Reoccurring statements from Stakeholders emphasized that these groups play a major role in economic development or regional promotion by helping create and maintain businesses within our region. The Committee recognizes that funding is the largest limiting factor for tourism promotion. While the City of Spokane Valley does provide some funding, the Committee recommends that the City continue to find ways to enhance funding of these organizations. Promote access to the Spokane River. It was said that we have the most beautiful section of the Spokane River, yet we don't promote it. The Sullivan Hole area is a national attraction for whitewater rafters and fly fishermen. Implement a Certified Sites Program. In order to be competitive with business recruitment, we need to provide our economic development partners with additional tools. Businesses looking to expand or locate to our area want to know that their business(s) can be opened without long delays. It is also Page � 4 important to note the importance of consistency; define what a Certified Site means in Spokane Valley, and provide a process for sites to become certified. LUNG-TERNI �(?��LS'/PR�JJ�'�`�'� Planning: A vision for the City of Spokane Valley will provide the City with a cohesive direction and enable the City to seek funding opportunities. • Encourage the creation and development of districts within the City of Spokane Valley that could provide neighborhood destinations and business marketing opportunities. • Define a city center to provide the City of Spokane Valley with its own identity. River and Recreational Areas: The City of Spokane Valley contains one of, if not the most, vibrant sections of the Spokane River, yet we don't promote it. • Create a plan for developing and marketing the Spokane River as a major destination. • Create defined access points between the Centennial Trail and the Spokane River (this will help protect the environment and improve river access). • Consider a preventative maintenance program for the Centennial Trail similar to street preservation. Small investments now would prevent expensive projects later . Sports/Sporting Facilities: With the increase in youth and intramural sports participation, the number of citizens who have to travel throughout the region has also grown. • Enhance existing sports facilities to attract tournaments and events to the area (i.e. soccer fields at Plante's Ferry Park, expansion ofthe HUB). • Consider making the City of Spokane Valley the youth/intramural sports capital of the region guided by the Sports Commission Project Sports 2012 Vision Study (to be released in the near future). Diversity: Recognize that it is the balance between commercial, industrial and residential that makes our City strong and defines who we are. • Support industrial development by expanding/providing sewer and water availability. • Provide annexation procedures and proactively consider areas designated as urban under the Urban Growth Area (UGA). For example, developers pointed out the shortage of large residential development lots available within the City of Spokane Valley. • With limited resources available for commercial recruitment, the City of Spokane Valley should work with strategic partners in recruitment of destination type businesses (i.e. businesses that people are willing to travel to). Page � 5 S`pokane �Valley°� �:�,�¢}� w�.��r� ,��,,.�° � ��sk.�:� �;� , � ��' �'�`�� ,� � �: . , :_.� �� . Report to Council �.�. . - ,. . . { �� '' � ~�,� � M i� � -_ ��F � � _ y �c r!. °` t e � x� ' • �'�,�`' '� ; y ��'. �` '� �� ` � / Econorrrr�ic %� n y' �' *�,'W �t ` .c .� �:. �:i. r. �'�i� '1: t4+,� . �- �4 .s +�v r� ' . ' ,i . "' _ . ��' �� ' � F� �� ;�� Developrr�ent - ...� � �- ��`.��- ;� ��,' ,:� � ` �� ,� ` ��; � #_ Reeorr�rreendations �# � -� �' � - n ��- 5� *'i' ��Y��.P�� 3� � , _ 4-��.c�� .��..� _ �t � .'�r �' S:FaC$�:v _ . �'�� n "r �� * _ � r � � ,* �e�,`'��.r.'� "° � �. , �� _ �r :�I: � � �.��+� �,�� _*: ��y , f =� � ��. Deeernber 1 1 , , . , -- . � `°.'�� 2 012 � � �_. , �. �t� 1 � � S`pokane �Valley�. �� i r`i'1 Itt�+� �LI r��` ► The goal of the Economic Development Committee wasto hearfrom membersof the community �atherin� information and ideas about projects and/or improvements that could benefit economic development in Spokane Valley, including physical infrastructure improvements. �. .,� � � � S`pokane �Valley�� t� k� h�ld �r� SPORTS BUSINE55 DEVELOPMENT �= Spokane Regional Sports F Greater Spokane Valley Chamber Commission of Commerce � HUB Sports Complex � Greater Spokane Incorporated TOURISM, CONVENTIONS, WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT HOSPITALITY a� Spokane Area Workforce ➢ Washington Restaurant Association Development Council ► Hotel/Motel Association r Central Valley School District � Visit Spokane .� Spokane County Library District RIVER GROUPS LOCAL DEVELOPERS .: Spokane River Forum : Pinecroft Business Park �� Washington State Parks o> Diamond Rock Construction v� L and L Homes �. �t� 3 � � � h � rt-T� rr� � �� I � � r� � ��t� 1 ['I-11` [}F �� , - - ,��5 k�� . .. •.,;�i•"�t� �� S`pokane jValley�. ��1 � rt-T+�r111 �7�� r�,�"�Ct� � Participate as a regional tourism partner � Promote the City of Spokane Valley as a business friendlycommunity. � Promote access to the Spokane River � Implement a Certified Sites Program �� Provide funding for economic development partners, including Greater Spokane Incorporated, Visit Spokane, Greater Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce, and the Regional Sports Commission. �. .,� 5 � � L� r� -T� rrr� � �� I � � r� � ��ct� � 1 ['I-11` [}F �� , - - ,��5 k�� . .. •.,;�i•"�t� �� S`pokane �Valley�. �'�� 1'1 I I�� A vision for the City of Spokane Valley will provide the City with a cohesive direction and enable the City to seek funding opportunities. ➢ Encourage the creation and development of districts within the City of Spokane Valley that would provide neighborhood destinations and business marketing opportunities. ➢ Define a city center to provide the City of Spokane Valley with its own identity. �. �t� � � � S`pokane �Valley�� F�i�u� r � r�d I��r��ti��n� l �►r�� The City of Spokane Valley contains one of, if not the most vibrant sections of the Spokane River, yet we don't promote it. ➢ Create a plan for developing and marketing the Spokane River as a major destination. ➢ Create defined access points between the Centennial Trail and the Spokane River (this will help protect the environment and improve river access). ➢ Consider a preventative maintenance program for the Centennial Trail similar to street preservation. Small investments now would prevent expensive projects later. �. �t� � � $ S`pokane �Valley�� p�rt� �p� rti r�� F��i Iiti�� With the increase in youth and intramural sports participation, the number of citizens who have to travel throughout the region has also grown. ➢ Enhance existing sports facilities to attract tournaments and events to the area (i.e. soccer fields at Plante's Ferry Park, expansion of the HUB). ➢ Consider making the City of Spokane Valley the youth/intramural sports capital of the region guided by the Sports Commission Project Sports 2012 Vision Study (to be released in the near future). �. �,� 9 � � S`pokane �Valley�� [� IV�' r�ltl�/ Recognize that it is the balance between commercial, industrial and residential that makes our City strong and defines who we are. ➢ Support industrial development by expanding/providing sewer and water availability. ➢ Provide annexation procedures and proactively consider areas designated as urban under the Urban Growth Area (UGA). For example, developers point out the shortage of large residential development lots available within the City of Spokane Valley. ➢ With limited resources available for commercial recruitment, the City of Spokane Valley should work with strategic partners in recruitment of destination type businesses (i.e. businesses that people are willing to travel to). �. �t� 10 � � �>�A �1t��`� 1 t � \� �$ � ' �'� �--� t r �[s.`-�, . �i,,, . �W.- :r:' ;S r �� - - - � �� `�e � � � �\l� � �r ' � :'`.�� ,., .�� i + � ��"� � ..� �� _� � � � �� '� .� � �� i ' . � � �� ti . � � - ,�� z. �_ �� 1 � �� , �� . , . i,��,V .� � �'�' �,. � � �. .., ,t :��. . � .'Y . .�_ . N ; G.�'3s L _;e'',( vY� # ['I-11` [}F �� , - - ,��5 k�� . .. •.,;�i•"�t� �� S`pokane �Valley�. T�'1 � r'1 �( �'''p LI � ► Keith Backsen �:�� John Miller ► Ben Baker �v Grant Person ► Julie Cohen Ana Josh Ramsey ► Wayne Frost rsy Ben Small ► Brenda Grassel �� Robin Toth ► John Guarisco r Ben Wick ► Erin Gurtel �. .,� 12 � � CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Acfion Meeting Date: December 11, 2012 Department Director Appro�aL � Check all that apply: � consent ❑ olt� business ❑ new business ❑ pub�ic hearing AGENDA ITEM TITLE; Approval of the Faflowing Vouchers: VOUCHER LIST DATE VOUCHCR NUMI3FRS; TOTAL AMOUNT l 1/09/2012 27�99-27525; 27544 $IG3,52$.13 ] I/09/2012 27526-27543; I 105120012; ]108120075 $801,131.17 11/16/2012 5532-5535 $2,47G.40 11/16/2012 I7545-27591 $G78,833.18 11/20/20I 2 4]42-4]45; 27592 $G0,590.23 11/21/20�2 27593-27G 13 $122,544.G2 11/2I/20I 2 27G]4-27667 $�89,9�6.�L 1 1/29/20I2 27GG8-27GG9 $15,737.04 I 1/30/20I2 27G74-27699; 1 i29120418; 130124022 $1,869,285.57 GRAND TOTAL �4,�403,G52.51 B�pla��ation of Fund Nuu�bers fo�ind on Vo�EChe�•L�sts #001 - General I'und Other F�uids OOI.0! I.000.51 [ City Council i01 —5tt•eet Fu��d 40I.413.040.513. C ity Manager 103 --Patl�s& Trails 001.013.015.515. Legal 145 —HoteUMotel Tax 001.01�.000, Pu6fic SaFety i20—CeElTei•Place Operating Rese�•ve 001.018.013,513, Deputy City Ma��ager 121 —Service Leve[ 5tabilizltion Resei•l�e 001.0I$.014.514. Fina��ce l22—Winter Weather Reser•�e 0O1.OI8.OlG,516, Huma►1 Resoir�•ces 123--Civic F'aciEities Replace�nenk 001.032.000. Puvlic Works 244—Debt 5e��vice 001.058.054.558. Co�»m. Develop,-Administratio�i 30] --Capita[ Projects (15r'/%RBET) 001.058.055.559. Comm. Develop,-Deve[op.Eng. 342—Special Capita[ Proj (2"d '/%REBT) 041.058.056.558. Community Deveto}�.- Platu�iElg 303 —5treet Capitat Projects 001.058.057.559. Comnn�nity Develop.- Buildii�g 304—Mi��abeau Point Project 041.076.404.57G. Pai•ks & Rec—Adn�inistratio�� 307—Capital Gr�nts 001.076304.576, Parks & Rec-Maintenai�ce 309—Par•ks Capital Gr�nts 441.07G301.574. �'arks & Rec-Recreation 310—Civ�c Bldg Capita[ Projects 041.476.302.576. Parks &Rec-Aquatics 31 I —5h�eet Capital ImproveEi�ents 20i 1+ 001.07G304.575. Parks& Rec- Sei�ior Cenker 402—Storn��vate�•Managen�enf 001.476345.574. Pa�•ks& Rec-Ce3�terPiace 403 —Aqi�ife�•Protectio�� Area 001.090.00O.S l t. General Gov't-Co��i�cil �•eiated 501 --Equipmei�t Renta[ & Rep[acement 401,490.040.514. Gei�eral Gov't-Fi�3ar�ce re[ated 502—Risk Managemeiit OOI.090.040,517, Gene�•ai Gov't-�mployee sEippfy 40I.090.000,518, Ge»eral,Gov't-Ce��h•alized Seivices 401,094.040.5 I 9. Gener�l Go�'t-Other Services 001.090.000.531. General Gov't-Nahiral Resources 001.094.000.554. Gene��al Go<<'t-�conomic Dev. 001.094.004.SG4. Get�era[ Gov't-Social Se��ices 001.094.000.594. Ge��erai Gov't-Capital Outlay RECOMMENDED ACTIOIV OR MOTION; Approve claims for vouchers as listed above. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Ca(houn, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: Voucher Lists vchlist Voucher Lisf Page: 1 11/09/2012 2:00:56PM Spo[cane Vatley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 27499 11/9/2012,001081 ALSCO LSP001229848 001.016.000.521 FLOOR MATS:PRECINCT 20.39 LSP01223432 001.016.000.521 FLOOR MATS:PRECINCT 20.39 Total: 40.78 27500 11l9/2012 000334 ARGUS JANITORIAL LLC INV007993 001.016_000_521 JANITOREAL SVCS:OCT 2012 2,165.23 To4a1: 2,165.23 27501 11/92012 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC 9379482 009.076.305.575 LINEN SERVICE AND SIiPPLY AT C 194.91 S0041828 001.076.305.575 LINEN SERVICE AND SI.iPPLYAT C 275.01 S0041870 001.076.305.575 LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLYAT C 371.90 S0042480 001.076.305.575 LiNEN SERVICE AND SUPPLYAT C 156_26 Tota1: 998.08 27502 11/9/2012 000326 CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION#19 October2012 101.042.000.542 UTILITIES:PW 283.38 Total: 283.38 27503 11/9/2012 000246 EAST SPOKANE WATER DIST#1 Odober2012 101.042.000.542 WATEft CHARGES:PW 1,064,42 Total: 1,064.42 27504 11/9/2012 002308 FINKE,MELISSA Oct 2012 001.076.301.574 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 107.90 Total: 107.90 27505 11/9/2012 000011 GRFATER SPOKANE VALLEY September 2012 001.090.000.550 OUTSIDE AGENCY ECON DEVEL G 4,018.33 TotaE: 4,0'18.33 27506 19/9l2012 002712 GTFX INC. 26164 001.076.305.575 SERVICE GRE4SE TRAP 109.79 Total: 'i09_79 27507 11/9/2012 002882 HOFFMAN MUSIC COMPANY SE-20921'[ 004.076.305.575 ACOUSTICAL PANELS FOR GREAT 8,112.61 Total: 8,112.61 27508 11/9/2012 000715 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS October 2012 001.090.000.519 SUPPL[ES FOR CP AND KffCHEN f 346_54 Total: 346.54 27509 11/9/2012 000070 1NLAND POWER 8 LIGHT CO 94202 101.042.000.542 UTILITIES=OCTOBER PW 334.57 Total: 334.57 Page: 1 vch[ist Vouche�'List Page: 2 11/09/2072 2:00:56PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Vouc4er Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept Description/Account Amount 27510 11/9/2012 001635 ISS FACILI7Y/EVENT SERVICES 470561 001.076.305.575 SEPTEMBER 2012 MONTHLY CLEA 7,136.00 479220 001.076.305.575 EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLAI 236.40 474478 001.076.305.575 EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLAI 98.50 Total: 7,470.90 27511 11/8l2012 00'1002 M&L SUPPLY CO.,INC. S100102473.001 OOt.076.305.575 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 164.35 Total: 164.35 275'12 11/9/2012 001684 MARKETING SOLUTIONS NW CP 10-29-2012-Media 001.076.305.575 ADVERTISlNG FOR CEMERPLACE 967.00 Total: 9&7.00 27513 11/9/2012 000132 MODERN ELECTRIC WATER CO 18037426 101.042.000.542 UTILITIES:PW ACCT NOT ON MAS' 4523 OcYober2012 001.076.302.576 UTILiTIES:PARKS 3,296_34 Total: 3,341.57 27514 11/9/2012 004860 PLATT 2567077 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES:CENTERPLACE 40.05 Total: 40.05 275t5 11/9/2012 000415 ROSAUERS 679763 001.076.30'1.574 SUPPLIES FOR REC PROGRAMS 45.32 Nov2012 001.076.301.574 SUPPLfES:PARKSAND REC 71.85 Total: 117.17 27516 11/9/2012 000709 SENSKE LAWrI&TREE CARE INC. 4478698 001.076.300.576 CONTRACT MAINT:OCT 2012 54,123.81 5278099 001.016.000.521 CONTRACTMAINT:OCT2012PREi 639.00 Total: 54,762_81 27517 11/9l2012 000935 SERVICE PAPER CO 76688718 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES:CENTERPLACE 81.53 Total: 81.53 27518 11/9/2012 000323 SPOKANE CO UTILITIES November 2012 001.076.302.576 SEWER CHARGES FOR NOVEMBE 1,414.38 Total: 1,414.38 27519 11/9/2012 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST#3 October2012 009,076.302,576 WATER CHARGES:PARKS 298.57 Total: 298.57 27520 11/9/2012 001083 STA�IDARD PLBG HF�,TING CONTROLS 50115 001.076.305.575 WORK ORDER 22516 160.33 50137 001.016.000.521 OCTOBER 2012 MONTHLY MA]NT F 553.60 Page: 2 vchlist Voucher List Page: 3 11/09/2012 2:00:56PM Spokane Valley sank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept Description/Account Amount 27520 11/9/2012 001083 001083 STANDARD PLBG HEATI�IG CONTRi (Continued) Total: 773.93 27521 11/9/2012 002306 TERRELL,LANDSCAPEARCHITECT,MIC 861 310.000.164_594 COSV SIGN DEVELOPMENT 3,841.56 Total: 3,84'IS6 27522 11/9/2012 001911 THE GLOVER MANSION CP555 001.076.305_575 EVENT SERVICES AT CEN7ERPLAI 90.55 CP562 001.076.305.575 EVENT SERVICESAT CENTERPLA� 245.13 Tota1: 335.68 27523 11/9/2012 000167 VPRA WATER&POWER September 2012 101.042.000.542 LITILET]ES:SEI'7EMBER 2012 3,621_53 Tota1: 3,621.53 27524 ' 11/9/2012 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 1619882 2681-1 001.076.305.575 WASTE MGMT_TEMPORARY DISP( 239.12 Total: 239.12 27525 11/9/2012 000487 YMCA OF THE INLAND NW September 2012 001.076.302.576 SEPT 2012 OPERATION/MAI�fTENA 28,970.00 Tota1: 25,970.00 27544 11/9/2012 000193 NOR7HWES7 CHRISTIAN SCWOOL 1NC November 2012 001.090.000.518 CITY HALL RENT 39,566_35 Tota1: 39,566.35 28 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank toYa]: 163,528.13 28 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 163,528.13 Page: 3 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 91/09/2012 1=18:05PM Spokane Valley Bankcode: apbank Voucher pate Vendor Imoice FundlDept DescriptioNAccount Amount 27526 11/9C2012 001668 ALDWORTH,CRAIG EXPENSE 303.303.145.595 EXPEMSE REIMBURSEMENT 49.00 Total: 49.00 27527 11/9l2012 002615 BULLOCK,SUSAN EXPENSE 001.013.015.515 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT-OCT 35.46 EXPENSE 001.013.015.515 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 111.95 Total: 147.41 27528 11/9/2012 000571 CODE PUBLISHING CO 42036 001.013.000.513 WEB HOSTING SERVICES 350.00 Totai: 350_00 27529 11/9/2012 000683 DAV1D EVANS 8�ASSOCIATES 323683 311_000.162541 2012 TRAFFIC ENGtNEERING SER` 253.03 Total: 253.03 27530 11/9/2012 001121 DEW DROP SPRINKLERS,8 LANDSCAPI CENTERPLACE#2 309.000.172.594 CP LANDSCAPE DEVELOPEMENT 42,402.93 Total: 42,402.93 27531 11/9l2012 000746 EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPT 217156-00 2 502.502.000.517 3RD QTR 2012 8,436.00 Total: 8,436.00 27532 11/9/2012 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLiSHING IHC 38619 001.058.056.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 18720 38621 001.013.000.5'[3 LEGAL PUBLICATION 25.00 38622 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 40.80 38623 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 51.85 38624 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 25.00 Total: 329.85 27533 11l9/2012 001253 GORDON THOMAS HONEYWELL OCT 12 1042 001.019.000.511 LOBBYIST SERVICES 3,346.44 Total: 3,346.A4 27534 11/9/2012 002682 HAFNER,CHARLES EXPENSE 001.011.000,511 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT-OC7 86.58 EXPENSE 001.011.000.511 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT-SEP� 73.26 EXPENSE 001.011.000.511 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT-AUG 253.08 Total: 412.92 27535 T1/9/2012 002953 LITHOGRAPH REPRODUCTIONS,INC 2705R 001.058.056.558 LETTERSAND BROCHURES 1,073.96 Tofal: '1,073.96 Page: 1 vchtist Voucher List Page: 2 11/09/2012 1:18:05PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept DescriptioNAccount Amount 27536 11/9/2012 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 629983502001 001_018.013,513 OFFICE SUPPLIES:OPS&ADMIN 5321 629983648001 001.018.013.513 OFFICE SUPPLIES:OPS 8 ADMIN 7.15 630353243001 001.076_000.576 OFFICE SUPPLIES:PARKS 154.56 630353459001 001_076_000.576 OFFICESUPPLIES:PARKS 8.66 630530677001 001.090.000.519 OFFICE SUPPLIES:CONF ROOM 3.91 Total: 227.49 27537 11/9I2012 000027 OFF]CE OF THE CODE REVISER 0007271-01 001.013_015.515 LEGAL PUBLICATION 250.01 Total: 250.04 27538 1U9I2012 000854 SHERRY PRATT VAN VOORHiS, INC 1349.05 309.309.165.594 0165 TERRACE VIEW PARK-PRO.. 263.25 Tohl: 263.25 27539 11/9/2012 000862 SPOKANE ROCK PRODUCTS,INC. PAY APP 2 311.223.40.00 2012 STREET PRESERVATION PHP 496,858.66 Tota[: 496,858.66 27540 11/9/2012 000093 SPOKESMAN-REVIEW 335212 001.018.016.516 ADVERTISEMENT;ACCT 50869 249.60 TotaE: 249.60 27547 71/9l2012 000780 UNION PACIFIC RR CO 90030149 303.303.005.595 PINES RD MP 8_95-PROGRESSIVE 6,923.84 90030150 303.303.005.595 PINES RD MP 8.95-PROGRESSIVE 28,041.79 Total: 34,965.63 27542 1U9l2012 003210 WEST CONSULTANTS,INC. 003195 001.058.055.559 SALTESE CREEK FLOODPLAIN STI 328.86 Total: 328.86 27543 11/9/2012 001409 WORLD CLASS COMMUNICATIONS 121011173101 001.076.305.575 ANSWERING SERVICE CENTER P� 22.00 Total: 22.00 1105120012 1�I5/2012 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER October 2012 001.0�6.000.539 SPOKANE COUNTY SERVICES 207,856.17 Total: 207,856.17 1108120075 11I9/2012 002244 AOT PUSLIC SAFEiY CORPORATION SPKVLY-34 001.076.000.521 CRYWOLF CHARGES SEPTEMBEF 3,307.96 Total: 3,307.96 20 Vouchers for bank code: apbank gank total: 80'I,737.77 Page: 2 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 11/16/2012 11:25:23AM Spokane Valley Bank code: pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor I�voice FundlDept Description/Account Amount 5532 10/16/2012 001853 ALZHEIMERSASSOC REFUND 001_237.10.99 DEPOSITREFUND:MIRABEAU ME 257.00 Total: 257.00 5533 10/16/2012 003218 BENNETT,BARBARA REFUND 001.237.10.99 REFUND DEPOSIT:GREAT ROOM 89.00 ror�i: as.00 5534 10/16/2012 003217 SHUSTOV,VERA REFUND 001.237.10.99 REFUND DEPOSIL-GREAT ROOM 1,520.00 Tohl: 7,520.00 5535 10/16/2012 003219 WILES,KA7Y REFUND 001.237.10.99 REFUND DEPOSIT:GREAT ROOM 210.00 Total: 210.00 4 Vouchers for banK code: pk-�ef Bank total: 2,076.00 a Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 2,076.00 I,the undersigned,do ceRify under penalty of perjury, that the maYerials have been fumished,tha sarvices rendered,or the Iabor perFurmed as described herein and thatthe claim isjust,due and an unpaid obligation againsf the City of Spokane Valley,and that I am author¢etl to authenticate antl certify saitl claim. Finance Diredor Date Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: 1 vchlist VouGher List Page: 4 14/16/2012 41:44:56AM Spokane Valley sank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept Description/Account Amourtt 27545 11!'[6/2042 002988 ACE LANDSCAPWG 1837 101.042.000.542 2012 LANDSCAPING RIGHT OF WA 8,709.57 ToYal: 8,709.57 27546 11/16/2012 002931 ALL WESTERN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 94073 101,000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 42.72 Total: 42_72 27547 11/16/2012 003076 AMSDEN,ERICA EXPENSE 009.032.000_543 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMEN7 20.54 Total: 20.54 27548 11/16/2012 003213 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES CRYWOLF 001.000.000.342 CRYWOLF REFUND PERMIT:V126• 447.37 Total; 147.37 27549 11/16/2012 002807 BOUTEN CONSTRUCTION CO. PAYAPP 7 309.309.079.594 GREENACRES PARK CONSTRUCT 71.54 Total: 71.54 27550 11/i6/2012 002517 BROWN BEARING CO INC 6916512 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 396.75 Tota!: 396_75 2755'[ 11/16/2012 003212 CANCER CARE NORTH WEST CRYWOLF 001.000.000.342 CRYWOLF REFUND PERMIT:V325: 165.00 Total: 1fi5.00 27552 '[1/16l2012 000863 CENTURY WEST ENG CORP 233350 101.042.000.542 2012 TIp SERVICES-EXPIRES 1?J: 6,782.10 7ota1: 6,782.10 27553 11/16/2012 002572 CINTAS CORPORATOIN 606731411 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 115.69 606732358 101.00OA00.542 SUPPLIES:PW 195.69 606732406 101.042.000.543 SERV]CES:PW 187.70 606733322 101_000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 13'I.45 606734279 101.000.000.542 SUPPIES:PW 195.69 606734317 402.402.000.543 SERVICES:PW 160.53 606735209 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 115.69 Total: 942.44 27554 11/16I2012 001048 CITY PARCEL WC1210150 001.058.057.559 COURIER SERVICES:CD 12.75 Total: 12.75 27555 11/16Y1012 00057'[ CODE PUBL]SHING CO 42073 004_013_000_513 MUNICIPAL CODE UPDATE 443.48 Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 11/16/2012 1'[:44:56AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Envoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amoant 27555 91/16/2012 000571 000571 CODE PUBLISHING CO (Continued) 7otal: 443.48 27556 91/16/2012 000508 CONOCOPH[LL1PS FLEET 31048468 001.058.057.559 OCTOBER 2012:FLEET FUEL BILL 3,535.92 Total: 3,535.92 27557 11/16/2012 002920 DIRECTV,INC 19061290525 101.042.000.543 NOV 2012 CABLE SVCS:MAINT FA� 34_99 Total: 34.99 27558 11l16/2012 002157 ELJAY OIL COMPANY 4203409 101.000.000.542 OCTOBER 2012:FUEL 202.63 Total: 202:63 27559 11/i6/2012 001232 FASTENALCO IDLEW85722 901.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 26.06 IDLEW85864 901.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 21.20 Total: 47.26 27560 11l16/2012 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISH[NG INC 38620 00'[.032.000.543 LEGAL Pl1BLICATION 73.64 Total: 73.60 27561 19/16/2012 000007 GRAINGER 9966706583 502.502.000.518 SAFEIYSUPPLIES FLEET 375.50 Total: 375.50 27562 19/16l2012 000011 GREATER SPOKANE VALLEY 21798 001.018.013.513 ANNl1AL MEMBERSHIP 350.00 Totai: 350.00 27563 19/16/2012 003177 GUTH,ERIC EXPENSE 001.032.000.543 EXPENSE REIMSURSEMENT 26.95 Total: 26_95 27564 1'I/16/2012 003215 HAUGEN,PHILLIP CRYWOLF 001.000.000.342 CRYWOLF REFUND PERMIT:V497� 25.00 Total: 25.00 27565 11/16/2012 002043 HDR ENGINEERING,INC 00022433B 403.400.163.595 SPRAGUE SWALE UPGRADE DESI 11,580_61 Total: 11,580.61 27566 19/16/2012 002520 HUSKY INTERNAT[ONALTRUCKS 75079 101.000.000.542 PW:MAINTENANCE SHOP 83.91 CM62009 101.400.000.542 PARTS/SUPPLIES RERJRNED:PW -32.63 Total; 5L28 27567 1'I/16l2012 000313 INLAND ASPHALT COMPANY INC. PAYAPP 2 403.000.163.595 CONSTRUCTION-SPRAGUE SWAI 422,&29.55 Page: 2 vchlist Voucher List Paye: 3 11I1612012 11:44:S6AM Spokane Valley 8ank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept DescriptionlAccourrt Amount 27567 11/16/2012 000313 000313 INLAND ASPHALT COMPANY[NC. (COntinued) Tota1: 422,629.55 27568 11/16/2012 OOQ401 INLAND tJW CHAPTER OF ICC 121108 001.058.057.559 REGISTRATION FOR OFF[CIALS St 480.00 Total: 480.00 27569 11/16/2012 001944 LANCER LTD 0430996 001.032.000.5A3 REfURNED NAME PLATE �7.83 0431686 001.076.000.576 ZOO PHOTO:PARKS 38.05 0431688 001.032.000.543 BUSINESS CARDS 57.07 Total: 47.29 27570 11/16/2012 002259 MENKE JACKSON BEYER EH[LS A39 001.013.015.575 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,065.25 470 00'1.013.015.595 PROFESSIONALSERVICES 638.78 492 303.303.060.595 PROFESSIONALSERVICES 157.50 511 001.013.015.595 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 153.42 Total: 8,044.95 27571 11l16/2012 000662 NAT'L BARRICADE 8 S[GN CO 78278 001.032_000_543 SAFE7Y SUPPLIES:PW 86.96 78307 '101.042.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 694.59 Total: 781.55 27572 19/16/2012 0032'['[ NORDIC TARPS MFG IHC 12732 101.042.000_542 TARP FOR VEHICLE 47362D 1t4.14 Total: 144.94 27573 1'IM6f2012 000652 OFFICE DEPOT ItJC. 630'12932000'I 001.032.000.543 OFFICE SUPPLIES:PW 16.24 630757361001 001.032.000.543 OFFICE SUPPLIES:PW 31.94 630880072001 001.018.014.514 OFFICE SUPPLIES:F[HANCE 49.15 Tofai: 97.33 27574 11/16/2012 000307 OFF[CE OF THE STATE TREASURER OCTOBER 2012 001.016.000.586 STATE REMITTANCE 67,080.49 ' Total: 67,080.49 27575 11/t6YLOt2 000889 OXARC CM95729 401.000.000.542 RETURNED SUPPLIES:PW -503_63 R144267 101.000.000.542 SUPPLlES:PW 90.82 R162098 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES;PW 90.82 SSW1235 101.000.000.542 SUPPLlESMAINTSHOP 525.98 Tota[: 203.99 27576 11/16/2012 003216 PERSON,GRANT&DIXIE CRYWOLF 001.000.000.342 CRYWOLF REFUND PERMIT:V122: 25.00 Page: 3 vchlest VouChe�LISt Page: 4 11/16/2012 11:44:56AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept DescriptionlAccount Amount 27576 91/16/2012 003216 003216 PERSON,GRANT&DIXIE (Continued) Tofal: 25.00 27577 11/16/2012 001089 POEASPHALTPAVING,INC. PAYAPP 1 303.303.106.595 12-03648TH&SUNDOWN CONSTF 125,212.18 Tofal: 125,212.18 27578 11/16/2012 000318 SHAMROCK PAVING INC 1371 907.042.000.542 SUPPL[ES:PW 1,200.05 611 101.042.000.542 APP#1 GLENN ROAD PATCH 6,573.00 Tofal: 7,773.05 27579 11/16/2012 0032'I4 SMOKING LEGALANYWHERE CRY+NOLF 001.000.000.342 CRYWOLF REFUND:PERM[T V382' 25.00 Tofal: 25.00 27580 11/16/2012 000779 SOUTHARD,BRAD OC70BER 2012 101.042.000.542 2012 DEAD ANIMAL REMOVAL 2,040_00 Total: 2,040.00 27581 11/16/2012 000230 SPOKANE CO AUDITORS OFFICE OCTOBER 2012 001.058.056.558 RECORDIHG FEES 918.00 Total: 918.00 27582 11/16/2012 000308 SPOKANE CO PROSECU7WG ATTY OCtober 2012 001.016.000.586 CRIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION F 988.78 Total: 988.78 27583 11/16/2012 000658 SPOKANE CO SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER 15 2012 001.013.015.515 FILE COMPLAtNT 240.00 Total: 240.00 27584 11/16/2012 000001 SPOKANE COTREASIiRER 51501377 101.Q42.000.542 DETENTION SVCS INVOICE:OC7V 6,472.86 Total: 6,472.86 27585 11/16P2012 002540 SPOKANE HOUSE OF HOSE INC. 249676 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 50_22 Total: 50.22 27586 19l16/2012 000093 SPOKESMAN-REVIEW 336699 001.013.000.513 ADVERTISEMENT:ACCT 42365 393.91 Total: 393.91 27587 19/16/2012 002135 SPRAY CENTER ELECTRONICS,INC 216973 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 40.66 217002 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 43.88 Total: 84.54 27588 11/16/2012000065 STAPLESADVANTAGE 3185066885 001A58.057.559 OFFICESUPPLIES:CD 90.50 Page: 4 vchlist Voucher List Page: 5 11/16/2012 11:44:56AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept DescriptioNAccount Amoant 27588 11/162012 000065 STAPLESADVANTAC:E (Continued) 3185066886 001.058.057.559 OFFICE SUPPLIES:CD 23.74 3185066887 001.058.057.559 OFFICE SUPPLIES:CD 23.45 Total= 737.09 27589 11/16l2012000257 STqTEAUDiTOR'SOFFICE L95881 001.090_000.514 SAOAUDITOF2011 509.76 Total: 509.76 27590 '1'[/96l2012 002651 WOODP.RD,ARNE IXPENSE 001_011.000.511 IXPENSE REIMSURSEMENT:OCT 137.76 F�CPENSE 001.011.000.511 IXPENSE REIMSURSEMENT:SEP' 88.34 Total: 225.50 27591 11/16l2012 000347 WORLEY,STEVE EXPENSE 00'I.032.000.543 F�CPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 250.00 Total: 250.00 47 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 67$,833.18 Page: 5 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 11/20/2012 9:38:17AM Spokane Val[ey Bankcode: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept DescriptionlAccount Amount 4142 11/20/2012 000048 VANTAGETRANS�ERAGENTS,401APLAN Ben46729 OOi231.14.00 401A:Payment 22,576_86 Total: 22,576.86 4143 11/20/2012 000682 EFTPS Ben46731 009.231.11.00 FEDERALTAXES:Payment 32,754.14 Total: 32,754.14 4144 91/20/2012 000145 VANTAGEPOINTTRANSfERAGENTS,457 PLF Ben46733 009.231.18.00 457 DEFERRED COMPENSATION:Payr 4,131.90 Total: 4,131.90 4"145 41/20l2012 000162 VANTAGETRANS�ERAGENTS,401AEXEC PL Ben46735 001231.14.00 401 EXEC PLAN:Payment 1,052.33 7otal: 1,052.33 27592 41/20/2012 001896 DANIEL H BhUNNER Ben46727 00923120.00 BONDI{R.4NT,MICHAEL 1203245�Paym 75.00 Total: 75.00 5 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 60,590.23 5 Vouchers in this r¢port Tota[vouchers: 60,590.23 I,the undersigned,do certify underpenalty of perjury, that the materials have been fumished,the services ren0ered,or the labor pertormed as described herein , and that the claim isjust,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valfey,and that i am authonzetl!o authentirate and certify said claim. FEnance Diredor Date Mayor Date GounciE Member Date Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 11I21I2012 12:03:50PM Spokane Valley Bankcode: apbanK Voucher DatP Vendor Invoice FundlDept Description/AccourtE Amount 27593 11/21/20'12 002638 ARROW CONSTRUCTlON SUPPLY 114577 00'].076.300.576 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 583.72 Total: 583.72 27594 11/21/2012 000030 AVISTA October2012 001.076.300.576 UTILITIES:PARKS MASTERAVISTA 9,719.52 October2012 101.042.000_542 UTILITIES:PW MASTERAVESTA 23,703.20 Total: 33,422.72 27595 11/2'1/2012 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC 9371502 001.076.305.575 LINEN SERV[CEAND SUPPLYAT C 38.66 9377514 001.076.305.575 LINEN SERV[CEAND SUPPLYATC 83.95 9381484 001.076.305.575 LINEN SERV[CE AND SUPPLYAT C 37.08 S0042088 001_076.305.575 LINEN SERVECE AND SUPPLYAT C 166.51 S004259� 001.076.305.575 LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLYAT C 36626 S0043t69 001.076.305.575 LINENSERVICEANDSUPPLYATC 12.50 Tofal: 704.96 27596 11/21/2012 000109 COFFEE SYSTEMS INC 3820:5070 001.076.305.575 COFFEE SUPPLIES:CENTERPLAC 92.55 3820-116242 001.076.305.575 COFFEE SUPPLIES:CENTERPLAC 90.93 Total: 183.48 27597 11/21I2012 001880 CROWN WEST REALTY LLC November 2012 101.042.000.543 COMMON AREA MAINT CHRGES:14 i69.53 Tota1: 169.53 27598 11/21/2012 003220 GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF,INLAND NC Nov 2012 001.090.000.560 2012 OUTSIDE AGENCY GRANT RE 600.00 Tofial: 600.00 27599 11/21/2012 000070 INLAND POWER R LIGHT CO 94202-010 101.042.000.542 ANNUAL UTILITIES:PW METER NC 19920 Total: 199.20 27600 11/21/2012 000388 IRVIN WATER DIST.#6 October2012 001.076.300.576 U7ILI7IES:PARKS 166.00 Odober2012 �01.042.000.542 UTELITIES:PW 75.00 Total: 241.00 27601 11/21/2012 001635 ISS FACILI7Y/EVEN7 SERVICES 470701 001.076.305.575 EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLA� 384.16 470702 001.076.305.575 OCTOBER 2012 MONTHLY CLEANII 7,136.00 Total: 7,520.16 27602 11/21/2012 000132 MODERN ELECTRIC WATER CO 18060428 101.042.000.542 UTIL3T[ES:PW ACC7 N07 ON MAS' 69.91 Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List �aye: z 17/21l2012 12:03:50PM Spokane Vatley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor �nvoice Fand/Dept DescriptioNAccount Amount 27602 11/21I2012 000132 000132 MODERN ELECTR]C WATER CO (Continued) Total: 69.31 27603 11/21/2012 000616 NEW HORIZONS COMPU7ER LEARNINC 32049 001.018.014.594 COURSE REGISTRAT]ON:SHAREP 2,375.00 Total: 2,375.60 27604 11/21l2012 000193 NORTHWEST CHRIST]AN SCHOOL[NC December 2012 001.090.000.518 C17Y HALL RENT 39,566.35 Totai: 39,566.35 27605 11/21/2012 001860 PLATT 2771631 00'1.076.305.575 SUPPLIES:CP 102.26 7otal: 102.26 27606 11/21/2012 000709 SENSKE LAWN&TREE CARE INC. 5173983 00'1.076.300.576 BACKFLOW CERTTEST;CENTERF 228.05 Total: 228.05 27607 11/29l2012 00'[992 SPOKANE HOTELMOTELASSOC 9157 001.076.305.575 DUERSAND MONTHLYMEET]NG L 90_00 Tota[: 90.00 27608 11/21/2012 000093 SPOKESMAN-REVIEW Acct 2916468 001.076.000.576 SPOKESMAN REVIEW SUBSCRIPT 192.00 Total: 'I92.00 27609 11l21l2012 001911 THE GLOVER MANSION CP530 001.076.305.575 EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLAt 420.40 CP563 001.076.305.575 EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLAI 202.44 CP676 001.076.305.575 EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLA� 135.82 CP690 001.076.305.575 EVENT SERVICESAT CENTERPLA� 152.18 CP691 001.076.305.575 EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLAI 152.18 Total: 1,063.02 27610 11/21/2012 003175 VISE7 SPOKANE 5678 105.105.001.557 2012 LODGING TAX REIMBURSEME 12,672.90 Tot31: 12,672_90 27611 11/21/2012 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 0056269-1518-4 402.402.000.538 WASTE MGMT:OCTOBER 2012 10,140.36 Total: 10,740.36 27612 11/21/2012000487YMCAOFTHEINLANDNW October2012 001.076.302.576 OC720120PERA710N(MAIN7�NAp 12,092.00 Total: 12,092.00 27613 11/21/2012 000487 YMCA OF THE INLAND NW November 2012 001.076.301.574 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 288.00 Page: 2 vchlist Vo�cher List Page: 3 71121/2092 92:03:SOPM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept DescnptioNAccount Amount 27613 11/21/20'12 000487 000487 YMCA OF THE 1NLAND NW (Continued) Total- 288.00 21 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 122,504.62 21 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 122,504.62 I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjary, that the materials have been fumished,Yhe services reode2d,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against Yhe City of Spokane Valley,and that i am author¢ed to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: 3 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 11/21/2072 3:28:O1PM Spokane Valley Bankcode: apbank Voucher Qate Vendor Envoice FundlDept DescriptionlAccount Amount 27614 11/21/2012 000921 ATO Z RENTALS 111644-1 402.402.000.538 TRAILER RENTAL:PW 426.10 Totai: 426.10 27615 11/21/2012 000958 AAASWEEPING,LLC 48708 402.402.000.538 2012 STREEf SWEEP[NG SERVICE 58,913.15 48709 402.402.000.538 2012 STORM DRAIN CLFANING SE 22,185.35 Total: 81,098.50 27616 11/21/2012 000648 ABADAN 177774 101.042.133.595 MATERIALS PUBLIC WORKS 243.27 Total: 243.27 27617 11/21/2012 003078 ALLWEST TESTING&ENGINEERING 61868 303.303.160.595 MATERIALS TESTING:PROJECT#1 960.00 61881 403.000.163.595 MATERIALS TESTING-PROJECT# 6,219_80 Totai: 7,179.80 27618 'I'1/2'[/2012 00'1081 ALSCO LSP01232529 001.058.057.559 FLOOR MATS:BLDG 39.55 Total: 39.55 27619 11/21/2012 001012 ASSOC BUSINESS SYSTEMS 14033A 001.090.000.518 COPIER RELOCATION 163.05 Total: 163.05 27620 11/21/2012 001606 BANNER BANK CRYWOLF 001.000,000.342 CRYVJOLF REFUND PERMIT:V343: 70.00 Total: 70.00 27621 11l21/2012 000168 BLACK BOX NEfWORK SVC SPO-036999 001.090.000.518 PHONE SERVICE 441.87 Total: 441.87 27fi22 11/21/2012 000796 BUDINGER 8 ASSOC INC M92488-1 303.303_106_595 12-022 K COMPACTION&MAT TES' 2,032.00 Total: 2,032.00 27623 11/21/2012 000101 CDW-G S704838 001.018.014.514 SUPPLIES:FINANCE 309.36 Totai: 309.36 27624 11/21l2012 003221 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY CIP#1056 303.303.156.595 SEPAAPPLICATIOH FEE 350.00 Total: 350.00 27625 11/21l2012 002842 CLYDENI/EST INC 00347086 402.402.000.538 EQUIPMENT RENTAL:PW 810.75 Page: 1 vchlist Vottcher List Page: 2 1912712012 3_28.07PM Spokane Va[ley Ban&code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/DepF DescriPtion/Account Amount 27625 11/21/2012 002842 002842 CLYDE/WEST INC (Continued) Total: 810_75 27626 11/21/2012 001888 COMCAST NOV 2012 001.090.000.518 H1GH SPEED IN7ERNET:qTY HAL 115.95 Total: 915.95 27627 11/21/2012 000734 DEPT OF TI�ANSPORTATION RE-313-ATB21113057 101.042.000.542 STATE ROUTE ROADWAY MAINT. 12,038.30 RE-313-ATB21113058 901.042.000.542 SIGNAL 8�ILLUMINATION MAIN 1,848.52 RE-313-ATS21113079 101.042.000.542 INTEL[GENTTRAFFIC SYSTEMS SI 558.11 Total: 14,444.93 27628 11/21/2012 000912 DEX MEDIA WEST NOVEMBER 2012 001.076.304.575 ADVERTISING FOR SENIOR CENTE 3221 Total: 32.21 27629 11l21/2012 001232 FASTENAL CO IDLEW85877 901.042.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 17.41 IDLEW85880 '101.042.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 1823 IDLEW85934 001.032.000.543 SUPPLIES:PW 198.53 To�l: 234.17 27630 11/21/2012 002507 FASTENERS,INC 5347559.001 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW '13.36 7ota1: 13.36 27631 11l21/2012 000007 GRAINGER 99726'13807 402.402.000.538 SUPPLIES:PW 156.65 Total: 156_65 27632 1'1/21/2012 000002 H 8 H BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC. OCTOBER 2012 001.058.057.559 COPIER COST 2,575.21 Total: 2,575.21 27633 11/21/2012 003222 HONEYWELL ELECTRONIC MATERIALS CRYWOLF 001.000.000.342 CRYWOLF REFUND PERMIT:V405 35.00 Total: 35.04 27634 11l21/2012 002520 HUSKY IN7ERNAT[ONALTRUCKS 72520 101.000_000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 38.98 75778 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 370.36 75824 101.000.000_542 SUPPLIES:PW 114.03 75926 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 57.26 CM4955 101.000.000.542 SUPPL[ES RETURN:PW -62.43 CM75778 101.000.000.542 SUPPL[ES RE7URNED:PW -130.40 Tofal: 387.80 Page: 2 vch[ist Voucher List Page: 3 11/21/2012 3:28:09PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept DescriptionlAccount Amount 27fi35 11/21/2012 002901 IMSA NW CHAPTER 101769 001.032.000.543 IMSA DUES: KIPP 80.00 Total: 80.00 27fi36 11/21/2012 000655 INTL CODE COUIVCIL:RENEWALS November 2012 001.058.057.559 CERTIFICATION RENEWAL:TURBF 125.00 Total: 125.00 27637 11/27/2012 000265 JACKSON,MIKE DECEMBER 2072 001.013.000.513 MONTHLYAUTO ALLOWANCE 300.00 Total: 300.00 27638 11/21/2072 000258 MICROFLEX INC. 00020897 001.090.000.518 TAXTOOLS SOFTWARE RENTAL:0 343.83 Total: 343.83 27639 11/21(2012 000696 MITEL BUSINESS SYSTEM,INC 95016102 001.090.000.518 SOFTWARE MAINTENAHCE 597.05 Total: 597.05 27640 11/21l2Q12 003204 NATIONAL BUSINESS FURNITURE MK404622-OFM 001.058.057.559 CHAIRS FOR PERMIT CEHTER 2,152.04 ' Total: 2,152.04 27641 11/21/2012 002243 ORBITCOM 00616240 001_090.000_518 E7HERN�T:NOVEMBEft 2012 590.00 Tofal: 590.00 27642 11/21l2012 000019 PURRFECT LOGOS,INC. 30200 101.000.000.542 4 VEHICLE LOGOS:PW 715.22 ' Total: 115.22 27643 'I'I/27l2012 002467 QWICK KURB,INC. 103631 101.042.000.542 SUPPL]ES:PW 283.91 Total: 283.91 27644 11121(2012 001941 SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES W0074993 009.058.057.559 GLOBAL POSITIOHIHG SUBSCRIBE 1,900.00 Total: 1,900.00 27645 11/21/2012 000235 SECURE SHRED 85091 001.090.000.518 SHREDDING CHARGES:NOVEMBE 165.30 Tota[: 165.30 27646 11/21/2012 002531 SIX ROBBLEES INC 5-649543 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 99.86 Total: 99.86 27647 11/21/2092 002906 SOLID STRUC7URES LLC 1170 101.042.000.543 REPA[RS TO MAWTENANCE BLDG 461.77 Total: 461.77 Page: 3 vchlist Vo�cher List Page: 4 11121/2072 3:28:07PM Spokane Valley Bank code: 2pbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept Description/Account Amount 27648 11/21/2012 000172 SPOKANE CO ENGINEER VLY1210 101.042.000.542 COUNTYSERVICES 41,113.Q4 Total: 41,113_04 27649 11/21/2012 000090 SPOKANE CO INFO SYSTEMS 50308943 001.018.013.513 COUNTY IT SUPPORT 19,153.56 Total: 19,953.56 27650 11/21/2012 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 51501365 001.016.000.523 OCT 2012 HOUSfNG INVOICE 97,739.00 Total: 97,739.00 27651 11/21/2012 002835 SPOKANE COURIER SERV[CES LLC 3023 001.011.000.511 BROADCASTING SERVICES:OCTC 110.00 Total: 110.00 27652 11/21/2012 002540 SPOKANE HOUSE OF HOSE INC. 251332 '101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 65.26 253276 '101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 21.09 Total: 86.35 27653 11/21/2012 000862 SPOKANE ROCK PRODUCTS,INC. PAYAPP 7 303_303.'[12.595 INDIANAAVE.EXTENSION CN CO� 1,501.55 Total: 1,501.55 27654 11/21/2012 001875 S7RATA SP120196-I�I 303.303.160.595 0160 GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORA7IC 2,090.25 Total: 2,010.25 27655 11/21/2012 002555 T.IARIVIERE EQUIPMENT&,EXCAVATIC 285498 101.042.000.542 GRINDER DISHMAN MICA 900.00 Total: 900.00 27656 'I'IY21/2012 000335 TIRE-RAMA 8080019579 001.058.055.559 06769D:VEHICLE MAI�ITENANCE 108.02 8080019616 001.058.057.559 32810D:VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 92.15 8080019659 001.058.057.559 40203D:VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 105.19 8080019705 00'[.058.055.559 06769D:VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 78.26 8080019891 904A42.000.542 40210D:VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 68.47 8080019959 10'[_Oa2.000.5a2 a0210D:VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 143.47 Total: 595.56 27657 11/21/2012 000717 TRANSPO GROUP,INC. 14849 303.303.061.595 PINES ITS DESIGN CONSULTANT 7,712.99 44852 101.042.133.595 0133 SPRAGUE ITS CONSULTANTi 14,990_14 Total: 22,703.13 27658 11/21/2012 002597 TWISTED PAIR ENTERPRIZES L.L.0 10312012 001.011.000.511 BROADCASTING COUNCIL AATGS:� 2,087.04 Page: 4 vChlist VOUCher List Page: 5 11/21/2092 3:28:O1PM Spokane Valley Sank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept DescriptionlAccount Amount 27658 1121/2012 002597 002597 7WISTED PAIR ENTERPRIZES L.L,C (Contin�ed) Totai: 2,087_04 27659 11/21l2012 003223 WELLS FARGO BANK CRYWOLF 001.000.000.342 CRYVJOLF REFUND PERMIT:V293 100.00 Total: 100_00 27660 11/21/2012 000676 WEST 825977185 001.013.015.515 OCTOBER SUBSCRIPTION CHARG 696.28 Total: 696.28 276fi1 11/21/2012 003210 WEST CONSULTANTS,INC_ 003255 001.058.055.559 SALTESE CREEK FLATS FLOODPL 6,356_10 Total: 6,356.10 276fi2 11/21/2012 002501 WHffE BLOCK COMPANY 0189279 402.402.000.538 CONCRETE COVER:STORMWATEI 125_74 Total: 125.74 27663 11l21/2012 002839 WIND WIRELESS INC. 76731 101.042.000.542 WIRELESS TELEPHONFJINTERNEI 84.95 Total: 84.95 27664 19/24/2012 000842 WM WINKLER CO INC PAYAPP 1 303.303.154.595 0154 SIDEWALK&TRANSIT CONS- 88,857.01 PAYAPP 1 303.303.149.595 0149 SIDEwALK INFILL CONSTRU( 286,132.17 Total: 374,989.18 276fi5 11/21/2012 003002 XO COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES 0254650098 001.076.305.575 INTERNET/DATA LINES:NOVEMBE 448.98 Total: 448.98 27666 11/21/2012 001885 ZAYO GROUP LLC HOVEMBER 2012 001.090.000.518 HIGH SPEED 3NTERNET CITY HALL 550.00 Total: 550.00 27667 11/21/2012 001885 7AY0 GROUP LLC NOVEMBER 2012-B 004.090.000.518 DARK FIBER LEASE 242.39 Total: 242.39 54 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 689,966.61 54 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 689,966.61 Page: 5 vchlist Voucher List Page. 1 19/29/2012 1:19:21 PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept Description/Account Amount 27668 11/29/2012 001606 BANNER BANK 0618 001.011.000.511 OCTOBER 2012:0618 233.60 4064 001.058.055.559 OCTOBER 2012:4064 2,314.58 4458 001.011.000.511 OCTOBER 2012:4458 266.1i 8861 001.076.305.575 OCTOBER 2012:8861 1,604.31 9048 001.090.000.550 OCTOBER 2012:9048 943.40 Total: 5,362.00 27669 77/29/2072 000321 GREATER SPOKANE WC '14808 001_090.000.550 3RD QTR 2012 ECO DEV GRANT R 90,375.00 TotaE: 10,375_00 2 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank toYa[: 15,737.00 2 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 15,737.00 I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of per�ury, Yhat the matel'ials have been fumished,the servioes rendered,or the labor perfortned as described herein and that the c]aim is just,due and an�npaid obligaEon againstthe City of Spokane Valley,and that I am authorized Yo authenticate and certify said claim. Fnance DirecEOr Date nnayor Date Council Member Date Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 11/30/2012 1:38:21PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 27670 11/30/2012 001081 ALSCO LSP01238985 001.058.057.559 FLOOR MATS:BLDG 39.55 Total: 39.55 27677 11/30/2012 0010'12 ASSOC BUSINESS SYSTEMS 599609 001.093.015.515 COPIER MAINTENANCE:LEGAL 99.21 599757 001.058.050.558 COPIER COST.CD 370.97 Totdl: 470.18 27672 11f30/2012 003224 CAD OF SPOKANE,IHC 23884 101.042.000.542 2012 STREET PRESERVATION 911.97 Total: 911.97 27673 11/30/2012 002419 CLARKS TIRES&AUTOMOTIVE 29554 001.076.000.576 06770D:OIL CFiANGE/SNOW TIRE: 8221 Total: 82_21 27674 79/30/2012 003083 DEBOISE,BRITTANI EXPENSE 001.076.305.575 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT:NOV 69_96 Total: 69.96 27675 11/30/2012 000912 DEX MEDIA WEST HOVEfNBER 2012 001.076.305.575 ADVERT[SING FOR CENTERPLACE 166.46 Total: 166.46 27676 11/30/2012 001926 FARR,SARAH EXPENSE 00'E.018.0'14.514 E7CPENSE REIMBURSEMEM-NOV 67.79 Total: 67.71 27677 11/30/20t2 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 38652 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 934.60 38653 001.013.000.513 LEGALPUBLICATION 950.40 38657 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 45.90 38658 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 31.45 38740 007.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 32.00 Total: 391.35 27678 11/30/2012 002568 GRANICUS INC 40363 001.011.000.5'['[ BROADCASTING SERVICES 719.59 7otal: 719.59 27679 11/30/2012 003t77 GUTH,ER[C EXPENSE 001.032.000.543 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT-NOV 27.56 Total: 27.56 27680 11/30l2012 000002 Fi&H BUSINESS SYSTEMS ENC. 241865 001.090.000.594 NEW COPIER MAINT CONTRACT 21,522.60 Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 11/30/2012 1_38_2'IPM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Vo�cher DatF: Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept DescriptionlAccount Amount 27680 11l302012 000002 000002 H&H BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC. (Continued} Total: 21,522.60 27681 11l30/2012 001728 HP FINANCIAL SERVICES CO DECEMBER 2012 001.090.000.548 DECEMBER 2012:LEASE PAYMEN- 2,918.78 Total: 2,918_78 27682 11/30/2012 001944 lANCER LTD Oa32326 001.090.000.519 GENERAL BUSIHESS CARDS 97.83 Total: 97.83 27683 11f30/2012 003190 LUKINS&ANNIS,P.S 316850 001.013A95.515 PROFESSIOHAL SERVICES 3,185.00 316851 001.013.0']5.515 PROFESSIOHALSERVICES 87.50 7otal: 3,272.50 27684 11/30/2012 003227 MARSHALKIN,YEVGENIY SHP-10-09 402.237.10.98 WARRANTY REFUND FROM 12/14/ 2,000.00 Total: 2,000.00 27685 11f30/2012 001035 NETWORK DESIGN&MANAGEMENT 21963 001.090.000.518 SENTINEL RACK MAINT QUARTERI 1,047.00 Total: 1,047.00 27686 11/30/2012 000652 OFFfCE DEPOT INC. 152a203495 001.090.000.518 OFFICE SUPPLIES:GENERAL GO� 70.09 632865851001 001.076.305.575 OFFICE SUPPLIES:PARKS/REC 46.79 632866265001 001.076.305_575 OFFICE SUPPLIES:PARKS/REC 126.08 Total: 242.96 27687 11/30/2012 002493 QSCEND TECHNOLOGES,INC 5333 001.143.70.00 WEBSITE SUPPORTAND HOSTING 8,151.90 Total: 8,151.90 27688 11/30/2012 000952 RECALL DESTRUCTIOH SVC 3901193361 001.058.057.559 DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION-PERN 87.48 Total: 87.48 27689 11/30I2012 000391 SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE DIST.#1 3RD QTR 2012 001.229.A5.00 3RD QTR 2012:FIRE CODE FEES 14,526.70 Total: 14,526.70 27690 11/30l2012 000311 SPR[NT 959698810.060 001.058.057.559 GPS PHOHE 71.23 Total: 71.23 27691 11/30l2012 000084 STANDARD REGISTER CO 1002917 001.018.014.594 CHECK STOCK FOR FINANCE 1,234.86 Total: 1,234.86 Page: 2 vChliSf VouCher List Page: 3 11/30/2012 1:38:21PM Spokane Valley Baok code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept DescriptionlAccount Amount 27692 11/30/2012 002110 TARGET MEDIA N.W.PUBLISH[NG 44167 001.018.013.513 HOT TOPIC FALLlWINTER 2012 838,23 Tota1: 838.23 27693 11/30l2012 000335 TIRE-RAMA 8080020140 001.090.000.518 40204D:WIPER BLADES 37.28 Total: 37.28 27694 11/30/2012 002254 70WEY,70M EXpENS� 001,091.000.541 EXpENSE REIMBURSEMENT:NOV 116.61 Total: 116.61 27695 11/30/2012 000486 TOWN&COUNTRY BUILDERS INC REFUND 001.058.059.322 REFUND FOR BLDG PERMIT BLD-'e 410.50 Total: 410.50 27696 11/30/2012 001464 TVV TELECOM 05188703 001.076.305.575 INTERNET/DATA/PHONE LWES:NC 1,159.78 Total: 7,159.78 27697 11/30/2012 002185 URS CORPORATION 5301814 001.058.158.558 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM 6,910.00 Total: 6,910.00 27698 11/30/2012 003206 VAN NESS FELDMAN,LLP 99974 001.058.056.558 PROFESSIONALSERVICES 3,688.30 Total: 3,688.30 27699 11/30/2012 003226 WA S7ATE ATTORNEY,GENERAL'S OFFE NOVEMBER 2012 001.013.015.515 ORDERED COURT COSTS 353.40 Total: 353.40 1129120018 11/30/2012 000497 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLOfV DEC 2012 204.204.000.591 DEBT SERVICE 2003 LTGO BONDS 428,81125 Total: 428,817.25 1130120022 11/30/2012 000001 SPOKANECOTREASURER 9290200406 001.016.000.521 LAW ENFORCEMENT 1,368,839.84 Total: 1,368,839.84 32 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 1,869,285.57 32 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 1,869,285.57 Page: 3 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 12-11-2012 Department DirectorApproval : ❑ Item: Check all that apply: � consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Payroll for Period Ending November 15, 2012 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Budget/Financial impacts: Employees Council Total Gross: $ 243,320.42 $ - $243,320.42 Benefits: $ 38,641.42 $ - $ 38,641.42 Total payroll $ 281,961.84 $ - $281,961.84 STAFF CONTACT: Raba Nimri CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 12-11-2012 Department DirectorApproval : ❑ Item: Check all that apply: � consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Payroll for Period Ending November 30, 2012 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: BudgeUFinancial impacts: Employees Council Total Gross: $ 236,042.32 $ 5,475.00 $241,517.32 Benefits: $ 131,241.29 $ 8,770.85 $140,012.14 Total payroll $ 367,283.61 $ 14,245.85 $381,529.46 STAFF CONTACT: Raba Nimri DRAFT MINUTES City of Spokane Valley City Council Regular Meeting Formal Meeting Format Tuesday, November 13, 2012 Mayor Towey called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Attendance: Citv Staff Tom Towey, Mayor Mark Calhoun, Finance Director Gary Schimmels, Deputy Mayor Cary Driskell, City Attorney Dean Grafos, Councilmember John Hohman, Community Development Dir. Brenda Grassel, Councilmember Mike Stone,Parks &Rec Director Chuck Hafner, Councilmember Steve Worley, Senior Engineer Ben Wick, Councilmember Lori Barlow, Senior Planner Arne Woodard, Councilmember Mike Basinger, Senior Planner Gabe Gallinger, Development Serv. Sr. Engineer Inga Note, Traffic Engineer Carolbelle Branch,Public Information Officer Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk INVOCATION: In the absence of a Pastor, Mr. Joe Dumlao of the Spokane Vet Center gave the invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mr. Joe Dumlao, USAF Retired, led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the agenda. INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: n/a COMMITTEE,BOARD,LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS: Councilmember Hafner: reported he attended the November 2 meeting with the Lobbyist regarding the Sullivan Bridge; went to the Greater Spokane, Inc. breakfast where Drs. John Mitchell and Grant Forsyth spoke concerning the economy; attended an STA (Spokane Transit Authority) Operation Committee meeting where budget discussion continued; went to the Urban Transportation Council Workshop and heard a discussion concerning transportation corridors looking toward the year 2040; went to a SCOPE Awards Dinner; attended a Regional Health Board meeting and mentioned that Board's process of becoming accredited. Councilmember Grassel: said she went to the Urban planning meeting presented by the City of Spokane; attended the Economic Development Committee meeting with Councilmember Wick and Community Development Director Hohman, and said the final report will be coming to Council in December. Deputy Mayor Schimmels: said he attended a couple meetings with the SRTC (Spokane Regional Transportation Council) group, and mentioned that all the projects rated within the last sixty days now have a zero rating, and said it will be interesting to see what happens; said he attended the Urban Transportation Meeting; and went to a Liaison Board meeting concerning solid waste. Councilmember Grafos: stated that he went to the annual Economic Forecast Meeting at the Spokane Convention Center as Councilmember Hafner reported, with Drs. Mitchell and Forsyth, and reported on some of the mentioned statistics of the current economy; said he met today with Mayor Towey, Mr. Council Regular Meeting 11-13-2012 Page 1 of 7 Approved by Council: DRAFT Hohman and a potential large employer for Spokane Valley, and said they plan to decide where to locate by the end of this year. Councilmember Wick: stated that he went to the legislative meeting concerning the Sullivan Bridge, and then took a tour of the bridge to see the repairs made; attended the last meeting of the Economic Development Committee and said they are working to put the report together for the presentation to Council; said he extended a personal letter of support recommending the Central Valley High School Marching Band to represent our community in the upcoming Inaugural parade. Councilmember Woodard: said he also attended the economic conference with Drs. Mitchell and Forsyth; went to a public workshop regarding the new detention facility and said he testified as an individual about the jail and the detention center; went to the legislative brie�ng with our Lobbyist Ms. Taylor concerning the Sullivan Bridge; attended the Transportation Corridors downtown meeting concerning the future of our corridors; went to the grand opening of the new Maverick Gas Station; and said he attended three functions honoring our veterans; and in appreciation of Veterans' Day, Council, staff and members of the audience applauded our veterans. MAYOR'S REPORT: Mayor Towey reported that he attended most of the meetings already mentioned; he also went to the Community Health Association on South Pines, and said that 50% of their patients last year were either under-insured or had no insurance; went to the Economic Forecast meeting; the Urban Transportation Corridor Meeting; reported that the West Valley City School is a unique school where students have a lot of control, that they have a Mayor and Council, Judge and Jury; went to the ribbon cutting at Dick's Sporting Goods at the Spokane Valley Mall; and today in two separate sessions here in the Council Chambers, said he was "drilled" by Summit Elementary School Children as members of our staff gave them a presentation on some functions of a City,including information about stormwater,parks and recreation, and bike safety. Mayor Towey then read a National Hunger and Homelessness Awareness WeekProclamation, which was accepted with thanks from a member of the Spokane Valley Partners. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mayor Towey invited general public comments;no comments were offered. 1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. a. Approval of the following claim vouchers: VOUCHER LIST DATE VOUCHER NUMBERS; TOTAL AMOUNT 10/16/2012 27291-27319 $343,997.03 10/19/2012 4111-4ll4; 27320 $63,17022 10/19/2012 5521-5530 $1,536.00 10/19/2012 27321-37371; 1017120027 $910,121.55 10/26/2012 27372-27422; 10131397 $166,275.60 10/29/2012 27423-27443 $37,916.10 ll/02/2012 27445-27493; 1030120025, 1031120002 $4,611,480.05 ll/02/2012 4127-4130; 4141; 27494-27498 $242,96829 GRAND TOTAL $6,377,464.84 b. Approval of Payroll for period ending October 31, 2012: $397,131.39 c. Approval of Minutes of October 23, 2012 Council Formal Format Meeting d. Approval of Minutes of October 30, 2012 Council Study Session Meeting e. Approval of Extension for Economic Development Ad Hoc Committee Report Deadline It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the consent agenda. Council Regular Meeting 11-13-2012 Page 2 of 7 Approved by Council: DRAFT NEW BUSINESS: 2. First Readin�Pro�osed Ordinance 12-028 Multi-Familv Re�ulations—Mike Basin�er After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to advance Ordinance 12-028 to a second reading at the December 11, 2012 Council meeting. Senior Planner Basinger explained the proposal as provided in his previous administrative report, and explained that the changes deal with standards for multi-family development when adjacent to single- family development. Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation:In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried. 3. First Readin�Proposed Ordinance 12-029 Commercial Vehicles (Trucks)—Cary Driskell After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to advance Ordinance 12-029 to a second reading at the December 11, 2012 Council meeting. City Attorney Driskell explained the proposed ordinance, and said that the signs would include "no trucks" and "local delivery only." Mr. Driskell mentioned that a resolution adopting a master truck schedule will be brought to Council separately later. It was noted that for the second reading, Section 7 will reference refrigeration units rather than idling. Mayor Towey invited public comment no comments were offered. T�ote by Acclamation:In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried. 4.Pro�osed Resolution 12-007 Acce�tin�Environment Desi�nations Shoreline Master Plan— Lori Barlow It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to approve Resolution 12-007 informally accepting the City Council Draft Environment Designations. Senior Planner Barlow briefly explained that the purpose of this resolution is to informally accept the draft environment designations, which would then be referred to as "Council Draft;" and afterwards, we would wait for the remaining elements to be completed, and then all would brought forward together for a �nal and formal review process as a complete Shoreline Master Plan. Mayor Towey invited public comment no comments were offered. T�ote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried. 5. Pro�osed Resolution 12-008 Business Route Si n�a�e_In�a Note, Eric Guth It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to approve Resolution 12-008 supporting the establishment of an interstate business route. Traffic Engineer Note explained that this resolution is in response to the recommendation from Council to establish a business route; she said this route would be between I-90 Exit 185 and E�t 293, and would include sections of Sprague Avenue, Appleway Boulevard, Appleway Avenue, and Barker Road. Mayor Towey invited public comment. Mike Kin�, Commercial Realtor with NAI Black, 17 S Howard, spoke in favor of the motion and said this business recognition will have a direct impact and benefit to the business community. There were no further public comments. There was brief discussion concerning whether the Chamber of Commerce submitted any comments on this proposal, with Ms.Note explaining that she is not aware of any comments; mention from Councilmember Wick of the cost involved, and Councilmember Grassel adding that this topic has been ongoing for several years, and she feels anything we can do to support the citizens and be more business friendly is a good use of our funds. Vote by Acclamation: I� Favor: Mayor Towey, Deputy Mayor Schimmels, and Councilmembers Hafner, Grassel, Grafos and Woodard. Opposed: Councilmember Wick. Motion carried. 6. Motion Consideration: A�roval of Comprehensive Plan Docket—John Hohman It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to approve the 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket. Community Development Director Hohman explained the amendments, which include two privately initiated comprehensive plan amendments which were received prior to the deadline; and he re-capped the City-initiated amendments as explained previously. Mayor Towey invited public comment no comments were offered. T�ote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. Council Regular Meeting 11-13-2012 Page 3 of 7 Approved by Council: DRAFT 7. Motion Consideration: A�roval of University Road Over�ass Study—In a� Note It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the contract with Fehr and Peers in an amount not to exceed$229,802 for the University Road Overpass Study. Traffic Engineer Note explained that this study came about from a couple different ideas, one of which was a suggestion in connection with the bicycle plan, to have better nonmotorized access off the freeways, and to have some type of improvement to allow cyclists and pedestrians a safer plan to go back and forth; she said this topic was studied by WSDOT (Washington State Department of Transportation) in the late 1990's in terms of a full interchange, but this current study is of the industrial area. Mayor Towey invited public comments; no comments were offered. Councilmember Woodard spoke concerning so many unfunded projects, and said he feels this project may be premature, or that perhaps the timing is not good; while Councilmember Wick mentioned the City's match is $33,7ll compared with the grant of$216,000; and said in order to move forward, we must have a plan; that the plan doesn't bind us, but gives us more data. T�ote by Acclamation: In Favor: Mayor Towey, Deputy Mayor Schimmels, and Councilmembers Hafner, Grassel, Grafos, and Wick. Opposed: Councilmember Woodard. Motion carried. 8. Motion Consideration: Sullivan Rd W Brid�e Project, Request to use De minimus Exemption— Steve Worlev It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded that Council agree that permanent and temporary impacts to Sullivan Park and adjacent state-owned recreational properties resulting fi^om the Sullivan Road West Bridge Replacement Project are "de minimus." Senior Engineer Worley said the purpose of this motion is to get agreement from Council and the public that the impacts to Sullivan Park and other state parks related to the Sullivan Road projects are de minimus, which means it will have minimum impacts to the park properties; and he acknowledged City Project Manager Engineer Aldworth, and CH2M Hill Project Manager Mr. Dingfield. Mr. Worley said we also now have signed letters from various entities stating that the proposed project will have no adverse affect to their activities. Mr. Worley noted that we must go through the NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) procedures, and Section 4(� to determine if the impacts are significant and afterwards, will go through the State EPA (Environmental Protection Act) Process, then through our own shoreline permitting process. Mayor Towey invited public comment no comments were offered. T�ote by Acclamation:In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried. Mayor Towey called for a recess at 7:20 p.m., and reconvened the meeting at 7:34 p.m. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mayor Towey invited general public comments. Jodi Sanders, Sterlin� Hos�italit�, Ar�onne Exit: said that August was a revenue record month; spoke positively of the activities in connection with the HUB and Visit Spokane, and said those organizations need to be funded as it makes a big difference with the hotels, and she asked Council to consider allocating funds to the organizations which give returns on investments. Liz Beck, Vice President and General Mana�er of the Spokane Vallev Super 8, 2020 N Ar�onne: said her hotel is unique in that it can accommodate 180 guests and is one of the largest Super 8's in the nation; said Visit Spokane the Fair& Expo Center perform better each year with funds given, and said the HUB and Visit Spokane are a huge factor in funding; and she thanked Council for funding the organizations. Andy Rooney, General Mana�er Mirabeau Park Hotel: said his business represents over 80,000 room nights a year and is the largest in the valley, that he works hard along with the Sports Commission, the HUB, and the Visitor's Bureau to bring tourism dollars to Spokane Valley and the region, and said he had more sell-out nights this year than since 2005. Council Regular Meeting 11-13-2012 Page 4 of 7 Approved by Council: DRAFT ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: 9. Lod�� Tax Advisory Committee Recommendation to Council—Mark Calhoun Finance Director Calhoun explained that the purpose of tonight's report is to share information and the non-binding recommendations from the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee, for allocations for 2013; and he went over the discussions of this topic from three previous council meetings, including the September 25 meeting when Council by consensus, decided to set aside $80,000 of those estimated $460,000 proceeds for 2013, with $30,000 for CenterPlace advertising costs, and $50,000 to be used for yet undetermined City marketing efforts, leaving $380,000, plus interest, for allocation consideration. Mr. Calhoun reminded everyone that those funds can only be used for activities that promote convention and tourist travel for Spokane Valley, and that the ultimate allocation decisions rests with CounciL Mr. Calhoun also noted that the notebook containing each applicant's grant request materials was distributed to Council earlier. As noted in Mr. Calhoun's Request for Council Action (RCA) form, those applicants included the HUB Sports Center, Spokane County Fair & Expo Center, Spokane Regional Sports Commission, Spokane Valley Heritage Museum, Valleyfest, and Visit Spokane, formerly the Spokane Regional Convention and Visitor's Bureau. Mr. Calhoun further explained that those applicants gave a presentation to the Committee on October 17, 2012. Mr. Calhoun said the Committee felt that CenterPlace should be required to make a presentation as the other applicants did; and that Valleyfest is a community event that should be funded by the City through the economic development funding process instead of through the Lodging Tax Funding process; he said Committee members discussed the merits of each application and how the funds should be distributed, and whether they (the Committee) should re- allocate that set aside $80,000. Ultimately, the majority of the Committee members recommended that the funds be made in two tiers: one including the previously allocated $80,000 for City purposes, and the second showing recommendations of ways to use those $80,000 funds; he explained that the chart on the RCA shows one tier allocating $380,500 to the applicants, and the second tier allocating $444,500 to those applicants; and that the data included an average recommended allocation to CenterPlace of$8,000. Finance Director Calhoun explained that each committee member gave their recommendations for each applicant,but did not ultimately vote on the final allocations. Councilmember Hafner said he noted, as included on the RCA, that some of these organizations received funding from the Outside Agency funding process; and that for this current process, committee members Doug Kelley, Lee Cameron, and Jeff Fiman recommended no funds for the Museum and for Valleyfest, and he asked if there were some rationale for those decisions. Mr. Calhoun said he didn't recall any conversation concerning not funding the museum, but that the three felt strongly that Valleyfest should not be funded through lodging tax, but rather though the outside agency process of this city. Councilmember Grassel added that for those agencies which were not recommended for funding, it was because the committee members felt these funds should be directly related to hotel nights; she said they acknowledged that the verbiage in the state statute does not require that but if the fund wants to be replenished each year, it should be given to those agencies that create that opportunity for hotel nights; and also recognizing that two of the three had received funding from this City's outside agency funding process. Councilmember Hafner added that it is should be clear that Valleyfest is not a City activity,but is a separate nonprofit organization. Mayor Towey said the allocation decision is set for the December ll council meeting; and at a previous meeting, Council concurred to set aside a certain amount of money to facilitate some of our own tourism; and said he realizes that those who applied for these funds, do a tremendous amount for our community but he feels it was wise that Council determined to set aside discretionary funds as many things occur through the year related to tourism; and he mentioned Visit Spokane's regional visitor's guide and the extra cost for this City to advertise in the guide and be included on their map, including things like Discovery Playground and CenterPlace; or for banners through Visit Spokane. Councilmember Grassel stated that over the years, there was a frustration by the committee as they feel there wasn't a connection between their time-consuming work of going through the applications and hearing the presentations; that Council Regular Meeting 11-13-2012 Page 5 of 7 Approved by Council: DRAFT they requested in future that CenterPlace also come before the committee and make a presentation to clearly specify how they will use the funding and to help identify if there are times they may be marketing the same way as Visit Spokane, or how they might partner with the Sports Commission in order to have a better use of the funds and identify where they could do some joint marketing. Regarding the funds Council set aside, Councilmember Grassel said we need to be cautious so as not to duplicate efforts, but to involve the Sports Commission, and Visit Spokane as we heard from the hoteliers tonight, they do see a return on those investments, and they want us to use those funds in a way that will help those groups that work together to bring in events into our city that bring in those hotel nights. Further, Councilmember Grassel said her bigger concern is we are seeing a reduced amount of funding this year, and we also lost the tourism funding from Washington State; and we need to be careful on how we spend the funds; and that concerning Valleyfest, we have worked to try to move some of the funding because Valleyfest does not generate hotel nights, which is a concern of the committee; that Council has tried to move funding used for Valleyfest from the outside agency grant and said she designated we could give some additional funds for a total of$25,000 this year. Councilmember Grassel said at the meeting, she asked what Valleyfest was doing with the $19,000 they received from the outside agency grant, and said it was stated that they were using it for economic development, and yet the application for outside agency funding said "the specific element for which we request funding is the marketing and advertising of Valleyfest for the Pacific Northwest Region; in order to accomplish this objective, this marketing message must be carried to the regional audience in the northwest and beyond;" and Councilmember Grassel said this is why she believes this Council granted those funds; and when she asked the director that day how the funds were being used, Councilmember Grassel said the answer was economic development, and in explaining that, the director told Councilmember Grassel that they were going to use those dollars they already received, to entice businesses along the Sprague corridor to participate in Valleyfest, through a banner/flag program. Councilmember Grassel said her concern with that is, she doesn't think that is what this Council's intention was for those dollars; that Council gave them specifically to use for marketing Valleyfest and said it wasn't her intention for Valleyfest to use the funds for economic development of Sprague businesses,but was supposed to be used for marketing Valleyfest. Councilmember Wick remarked that although Valleyfest is not owned or operated by the City of Spokane Valley, it is the feeling of many that the festival is the community event and said he takes ownership in the event feeling that it is a city-type event, and very centered on the valley, and is synonymous with our City; and that regardless of where the funds come from, it is a festival that celebrates and symbolizes our City and our community; and said he would like to make sure people realize we don't operate it, but feels we should be a major sponsor and that there are so very few of those opportunities, that he would hate to jeopardize this event. Councilmember Grassel said she agrees with that which is why she supported allocating funds to them from the outside agency funds. 10. Draina�e Easements: a. Beach House Apts; b. Cancer Center—Gabe Ga1lin�er Engineer Gallinger gave the background on these two drainage easements, as noted in his November 13, 2012 Request for Council Action form, and that in the one case, the current property owner requested the City extinguish the existing easement and accept the dedication of a new drainage easement for the relocated bio-infiltration swale; and in the second case, that of Mission Avenue, that the developer would like to reconfigure the easement, therefore the current easement would need to be extinguished. Should Council agree, Mr. Gallinger explained, these issues would come before Council at the December 4 meeting for consideration of a resolution approval to extinguish each easement. There were no obj ections from Council. 11. Advance A�enda—Mayor Towey Mayor Towey mentioned that there will be no meeting for the next two weeks, and that he will miss the December 4 meeting as he will be in Olympia attending a Mayor's Conference. Mayor Towey also noted that the Spokane Valley Tech, in collaborating with the East Valley School District and other area Council Regular Meeting 11-13-2012 Page 6 of 7 Approved by Council: DRAFT schools, has asked for a letter of support as they are applying for a grant to help with the NEWTECH Skill Center in Spokane V alley. There were no obj ections from Council. INFORMATION ONLY The following items were for information only and were not reported or discussed: (12) Street Maintenance Contract Renewal; (13) Street Sweeping Contract Renewal; (14) Mailing Inserts; (15) Community Minded Television Report; and (16) Greater Spokane, Inc 3rd Quarter Report. CITI'MANAGER COMMENTS none It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 8:11 p.m. ATTEST: Thomas E. Towey, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Council Regular Meeting 11-13-2012 Page 7 of 7 Approved by Council: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 11, 2012 Department Director Approval: ❑ Check all that apply: � consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion approval: Amendment of the 2012 Employee Position Classification Matrix GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 2.15.030, Personnel Authority, SVMC 2.15.040, Creation of departments— Offices and Positions — Council Audit PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adoption of the 2013 Spokane Valley Budget. BACKGROUND: With the adoption of the 2013 Spokane Valley Budget, this action would amend the 2012 Employee Position Classification Matrix to reflect the position classification changes connected to the restructure of the Permitting and Plan Review functions of the City. These changes would allow for customer service improvements to the City's building permitting function. Specifically this amendment would add the classifications of "Development Services Coordinator," Grade 16, and "Permit Facilitator," Grade 12 and change the title of "Assistant Planner" to that of"Planner." Staff recommends the amendments to the Salary Schedule as outlined above. OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Resolution 12-011 amending the Spokane Valley Position Classification Matrix. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None. STAFF CONTACT: John Whitehead, HR Manager ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 12-011 and Amended 2013 Employee Position Classification Matrix DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 12-011 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE 2012 EMPLOYEE POSITION CLASSIFICATION MATRIX FOR THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY. WHEREAS, the City Council from time to time must create new employee classifications and adopt conditions of employment for those newly-created classifications to adjust its workforce in response to workload demands; and WHEREAS, the City Council through Ordinance #12-024 adopted the 2013 City budget which included the staffing changes associated with enhanced permitting and Plans Review services to the customers of the City; and WHEREAS, since adoption of Spokane Valley Municipal Code provision 2.50.70, the City Council has created various new employee classifications job descriptions; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Spokane Valley Municipal Code provision 2.50.070 which, in part, provides that position classifications and job descriptions shall be developed for new positions. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, as follows: Section 1. Authorization is granted to amend the 2012 Employee Position Classification Monthly Salary Schedule modifying the title of"Assistant Planner" to "Planner," and creating the new classification of"Development Services Coordinator" Grade 16, and"Permit Facilitator" Grade 12. Section 2. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. Adopted this day of December, 2012 City of Spokane Valley Mayor Tom Towey ATTEST: City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Resolution 12-0ll Classification Matrix Page 1 of 1 EMPLaYEE POSITION CLASSIFICATiQN MONTHLY SALARY SCHEDULE I 2042 Salary Schedule(Amended) �ffective 12I11l2012 ' Position Title Grade 2�72 Ran e Cit Mana er Unclassified De u Cit Mana er 29-22 8 888.29 - 12 661.�8 * ' Cit Attorne 21 8 888.39 - 11 395.08 " '� Communit Deveio ment Director 21 8 888.39 - 11,395.08 " , Finance t�irector 21 8 8$8.39 - 11 39b.08 * i, Public Works Direcior 21 8 888.39 - 11 395.08 ' 't Parks and R�creaiion Director '19 7 199.37 - 9 230.79 ° I Human Reso�rces Mana er 98 6 4$p.26 - 8 307.29 "' I Plannin Mana er 18 6�80.26 - 8 3�7.29 * I Buifdin Officia€ 98 6 48Q.26 - 8 307.29 * Senior En ineer-Ca ifal Pro'ects,Devefo ment 98 6 480.26 - 8,307.29 ` De u Cif Attorne '18 6 48D.26 - 8 307.29 * Senior�n ineer-Traffic C1P Plannin IGrants 97 5 881.91 - 7 476.25 ' Accountin Mana er '17 5 831.91 - 7 476.25 Cit Clerk '16 5 248.20 - 6 728.20 �' �n ineer '16 5 2�8.20 - 6 728.2D � Senior Plans Examiner 'I6 5 248.20 - 6 728.24 ` Public Works 5u erir�fendent '16 5 248.20 - 6 728.20 * SeniorAdministrat's�e Anal st 16 5 248.20 - 6 728.2Q Ser�ior Planner 96 5 248.20 - 6,728.2d Davela rr�ent Servic�s Coordinator '!6 b 248.2Q 6�55.20 �' Associate Planner 95 4 72�.02 - 6 Q55.80 CenterPlace Coordinator 15 4 724.02 - 6[}55.8� Assistant En 'sneer '15 4 724.02 - 6 055.8[} 1T 5 ecialist 95 4 724.02 - 6 055.80 �n ineerin 7echnician 11 '15 4 724.02 - 6 D55.8Q Gf5lDatabase Adrn'snistrator 95 �4 724.02 - 6 Q55.80 Human Reso�rce Anal st '14 4 251.88 - 5 45Q.64 ° AccounianilBud et Ana6 st '!4 4 251.88 - 5 450.64 * Administrative Ana! st 14 4 251.88 - 5 45D.84 Planner 94 4 251.88 - 5 45Q.64 Buildin Ins ector I[ '14 4 251.88 - 5 45�.fi4 Plans Exam9ner '!�4 4 251.8$ - 5 45D.64 Public infarmation Officer 14 4 251.88 - 5�}5�.64 En ineerin Technician I 'I4 4 251.88 - 5 45D.64 Senior Permit S ecialist 14 4 251.8$ - 5 450.84 MaintenancelCanstructian Ins ector �3-14 3 826.38 - 5 450.84 Recreation Coordinator 13-14 3 826.38 - 5 450.64 Cusfomer�telationslFacilities Coordinator 13 3 826.38 - 4 905.37 Code Enforcement Officer 'I3 3 826.38 - �}905.37 Buildin Ins ector I '!3 3 826.38 - 4 905.37 ; Plannin Technician 'I3 3 826.38 - 4 905.37 i De ut Cif Cierk 12-13 3 445.00 - 4 905.37 " Seniar Center S ecialist 12-13 3 445.00 - 4 905.37 Hurr3an Resources Technician 12-13 3 445.00 - 4 905.37 * Permit�acilitator 92 3 445.00 4 494.73 Administrative Assistant 19-12 3 093.55 - 4 494.73 " Permit S ecialist 1'i-12 3 099.5b - A�}'I4.73 Accounfin Technician 19-12 3 099.55 - 4 494.73 Maintenance Worker 19-12 3,099.55 - 4 4'l4.73 Office Assistant II 10-1'I 2 789.41 - 3 973.46 Custodian 1D 2 789.41 - 3 973.46 Office Assistant I 8-1� 2 51 Q.78 - 3 575.28 `7he pay grades for posit3ons nof represented by the Union are 2.5%[owerthan reflecied above because they were not increased by the 2.5%COLA on January 1,2fl11 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 11, 2012 Department DirectorApproval: ❑ Check all that apply: � consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Memorandum of Understanding between Cities of Spokane Valley and Millwood for the design and construction of the Argonne Rd (Empire to Knox) Safety Project. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: 8/9/11 Presentation on HSIP projects, 12/4/12 Info RCA BACKGROUND: With over 32,000 vehicle trips daily, the Argonne Road corridor is the busiest street in the valley. Traffic delays on Argonne Road within the City of Millwood quickly impact the section of Argonne Road within Spokane Valley. It is mutually advantageous for the Cities of Millwood and Spokane Valley to improve safety and traffic flow on the Argonne Road Corridor. In 2011 the City of Millwood and Spokane Valley applied for and received a $180,640 federal Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant for the Argonne Road (Empire to Knox) Safety Project. This was an "invitational only" call for projects, where the corridors were pre- selected by WSDOT (Washington State Department of Transportation). The project will focus on reducing red-light running, rear-end, pedestrian and bicycle collisions. The City of Spokane Valley and the City of Millwood will do this by upgrading signal equipment allowing for corridor wide signal coordination, development of new signal timing plans, installation of countdown pedestrian timers, and signing of alternate bike routes. Spokane Valley Public Works staff will develop new signal timing plans and design the improvements. The Spokane County Signal Shop will install the improvements. The attached MOU (Memorandum of Understanding) has been prepared to define the responsibilities of both cities during the project. It has already been reviewed by the Millwood City Council and signed by the Mayor. OPTIONS: 1) Consensus to move ahead with the approval of the MOU with the City of Millwood for the design and construction of the Argonne Rd (Empire to Knox) Safety Project, or 2) Provide additional direction to staff. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Spokane Valley and City of Millwood for the Design and Construction of the Argonne Road (Empire to Knox) Safety Project. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The $180,640 project cost is 100% funded by a HSIP grant. STAFF CONTACT: Inga Note, Senior Traffic Engineer ATTACHMENTS: MOU between Cities of Spokane Valley and Millwood for the design and construction of the Argonne Rd (Empire to Knox) Safety Project. Grant Application for Joint Corridor Project—Argonne from Empire to Knox MEMORANDUM �F UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF SP�KANE VALLEY AND CITY OF MILLW��D FOR THE DESIGN & C�NSTRUCTION OF THE ARGONNE RD {EMPfRE TO KNOX) SAFETY PROJECT WHEREAS, tf�e c[ties of Spokane Valley (SPOKANE VALLEY) and Millwood (M[LLWOOD) applied for and have been awarded a $180,�4fl Federal 20'f2 Cify Safety Program grant to design and construct various safety improvements a[ong the Argonne Road corridor befween Empire Avenue and Knox Avenue and install bicycle route signs along various nearby streets (SAFETY PROJECT); and WHEREAS, SPOKANE VALLEY and MIL.LWOOD intend as pa�t of their 2fl12 Transpor�ation Improvement Programs, to design and construct the SAFETY PROJECT; and WHEREAS, SPOKANE VALLEY and M1L.LWOOD agree tf�at tf�e installation of the SAFETY PROJECT would benefit the ratepayers, taxpayers and the traveling public of both cities. NOW, THEREFORE, SPOKANE VALLEY and M[LLWOOD do hereby agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 — RESP4NS[BILITIES OF SPOKANE VAL.LEY 1. Pians and specifications for the SAFETY PROJECT will be prepared by SPOKANE VALLEY for construction in 2013. SPOKANE VALLEY will purchase equipment under WASHINGTON STAT� PURCHASING CONTRACTS where possible. SPOKANE VALL.EY will contract with SPOKANE COUNTY (COUNTY) for construction and instal(ation of elements of the SAFETY PROJECT that cannot be installed by Spokane Valley or Millwood forces. 2. SPOKANE VALL.EY shall have full control over the construction, shall be responsib[e for ordering and approving materiais, construction testing, and shall be the administrator for the project. 3. SPOKANE VALLEY sf�a[I make payments to the STATE and COUNTY upon receipt of invoices. 4. SPOKANE VALLEY sf�a[I submit for reimbursement from WSDOT Highways and l.ocal ' Programs all eligible SAFETY PROJECT costs based upon invoices provided by the COUNTY, Washington State Purchasing Department, and other vendors. ARTICLE 2— RESPONSIBILI7i�S OF MII,LWOOD 1. M[LLWOOD wiil provide SPOKANE VAL.LEY with right-of-way information, including existing road as-b�ilt information at the intersections of Argonne Road and Liberty, �mpire, Grace and Trent. 2, This Memorandum of Understanding, once fully executed, shal[ establish a commitment by M[LLWOOD to cooperate and coordinate wikh SPOKANE VALLEY in a timely manner on all design and constructfon associated with the SAFETY PROJECT. M[L.LWOOD will review 30% Page 1 of 2 and 9Q% plans and specif[cations prepared by SPOKANE VALL�Y. MILLWOOD shall provide a review response for each within 1�working days. 3. MILLWOOD shall designate a "responsibEe person" who sha[I represent MELLWOOD's interest during the construction of the SAFETY PROJECT, and shall coordinate any modifications or changes needed by MILLWOOD in conjunction with the work. �4. MILLWOOD shal[ identify the elements of the project that it wishes ta include in the projec� prior to SPOKANE VALLEY submit�ing the 30% review plans, 5. MILLWOOD shal[ install the SAFETY PROJECT elements identified in the previous paragraph within the grant timelines. ARTCCLE 3—ALLOCATION OF C�STS 1. T�e SAF�TY project is �QO% funded by a $18�,64Q Federal 2Q12 City Safety Program grant for al[ design, right-of-way and construction costs. There is na [ocal match required. 2. SPOKANE VALLEY is aufhorized to include in the reimbursement its eligible administrati�e and staff costs incurred for researching, preparing design documents, grant and project administration, preparation of change arders, sign [nstaflation, etc., for the SAFETY PROJECT. 3. MILLWOOD is authorized to include in t�e reimbursement its eligible administrati�e and staff costs incurred far researc�ing, re�iewing design documents, grant and project administration, sign insta[latian, etc,, for the SAFETY PROJECT. �4. MILLWOOD shall issue a no-cost permit to t�e COUNTY ta perfarm work within MILLWOOD'S right-of-way for t�e SAFETY PROJECT. C�TY OF SPOKANE VALLEY: gy: Date: Cify Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: gy: Date: Office of the City Attorney CITY OF MILLWOOD; gy: '�JC� dt°, Date: � ��- �s Honorab[e Daniel Mork Mayor of City af Mil[wood gy; Date: Office of the City Attorney Page 2 of 2 ' ' f � . { I City of Spokane Valley and C1ty of Miflwood )oint Corridor Proj�ct Ar�onne f�oxr� Empi�� to Kr�ox Congressional District; 5tn Legisfative District: 4�h Contact. [nga Note, P�,Senior Traffic Engineer,�note@spokanevalley.or�, 509-720-5011 Tom Richardson, Millwood City Planner,tom.richardson ci ofm�llwood,or 509-924-0960 Cost Estimate Estimated Project Cost Amount Requested $18{1,64Q $180,640 See detafled cost estimate on the attached page. Project Description This project wi[1 focus on reducfng red-I�ght runn�ng, rear-end, pedestrian and bicycle collisions, Spokane Val[ey and Millwood intend to do this by upgrading signal equipment allowing for corridor w�de signal coordination, deve�opment of new signa! timing plans, insta[latlon of countdown pedestrian timers, and signing of afternate bike routes. These programs are detailed below, This part of Argonne carries over �O,Q00 veh�cfes �t�LS-1_�� ii-,�-�i�_� r�ill � li�i.L111I �I per day and has enough freight to be a T2 route, It ; � 1_�� 'ua�'"g°�°F Isvery congested during peak periods. Wh1Ee much ��1�9�� '�` � _ �� _�.�� 1��3��ix�- ±� _ .� � �� -f�:_ ;;-: ��_� , work has been done on the peak hour signal ��a��; �,�;�i�,;.-��!��,�� - - �a5 , �r, ��i�d �-: , coordination,the corridor could operate better with ��F�;eg��,°��'- � �- �3� `� ss�s3.� �� ri'� i��;, A,�� '� i 1�t some sma[I changes. The three signals in Mlllwood � �;��{ ;n�¢� fi�si� � ��[��- � ��ii�� n�� u�li�� - Cd�� tanA�I� E4�, 4 n_ Q afta l0." a �l�5G53 �._t!� � 1_ §� -- have o�d control�ers and are not connected into the �1 �Q��-��"�__�i��-��:�.a � ' �� - �� central system. This makes it almost impossibEe for � � M{ ��)G�W o o,o�� 0�4,2� �r - �`` $� i � 7 ��1�� „�rederlck-AV �j �� '. �� them to stay in coordination with the Spokane ' q gi�' 3� ��-�;�; �� i��z��v�� '�� f� _� � � Valley and WSDOT signals to the south, ]eading to " �`" j �G�a�� ;,� ' j �^ p � Q 4�`ke'Y �( � ��`;, 4 }�- �-j�.I -'. Q A 't �� t�� :, .i increased congestion, more stopping at red lights, � ;��-R.��1 � � k�.: a� � -;j��i��"` � ' � � du�eyeAv..: :.y � 1E31� �I � � ;� � s� d r i v e r f r u s t r a t i o n, a n d l i k e E y i n f l u e n c i n g t h e c o 1 1 i s 9 o n ¢ �s-� � �i � i��'��` � � � � � �?. ,� a -�� ; � l �"� � � :-� �' .: rate, Under this project the City of Milfwood wou�d ��t��A_ �k A� � �� ; � r'�� replace their three control�ers with Eagle m52s A� ��f �t ¢ �4 � �; r- � �� - �� :�� : running I�extPhase and would install rad90 � �5��'"`��0�s��°C � v�,igoniery Av ' ; �' � "` ° �' �J� : �� m: interconnect in the signal cabinets. The �f;(��I��r� � � °j �- '�,� '��#a �fiefd�A� � � B�� =� "�` �9 S y_. interconnect would tie to Spokane Va[ley and ��-w�=��.��[��a ��_ ' � �� t�� a kv -�� w'�� ..�.��s WSbOT systems at 7rentjArgonne. Although the � � ��`�Q�a�=� `� � � � k, ?�1 ��"t�-��'^ � ��'R *. °° y"n�i� �4- � �-.� SPOKANEtVA'LLEY �;' � _ ��,� northern end of this project was designated as � ��,��;-��av�� - ��d�,, , ,� �� ,,� Em ire Avenue both cities a ree it woufd be best ��" � �� "ya � °�� ' ` r� ��'�y�� f� �'� " ��c� }7 t g ii�nti �` � �; n � ! � .. };%��]L�>:� � z1.-� � ro 1�� - � , � t� �. to fnclude the Liberty Avenue signaf as well to 1��`��`}a�p�� '�"��- �jgu�Q i; Corrldor�icin�ty map i � �;:n�_„ -�.. a y :;. �-. .. y N _y . .._...... .. ,_.�.��......:,,..:�.�.:. , �..— �-,�� ensure a!1 three Milfwood signals are operating the City Safety Program (2009-2015) � � � � City of Spokane Va[ley and City of Millwood same equipment. �n order to replace the contro(ler and �nstal[ the radios, the signal cabinets must be replaced.Tne project wil[also install countdown pedestrian signa[s at the three Millwood signafs (Grace, Empire, and Liberty) to reduce ped coilisEons. All construction work for the signafs would be completed by Spokane County since they maintain the signals for Mifiwood. Follow9ng the signal equipment upgrade the City of Spokane Valley will work with WSDOT and Spokane County to develop improved signal coordination pfans for the weekend, evenings,and other times of tne day as deemed necessary. Adjustments wil( be made to the existing peak hour plans. The (ast part of this project will address the bicycle coflisions. Due to the heavy traffic and narrow lane widths,Argonne is not recommended for bicycle travei. Spokane Va[ley and Millwood intend to improve a[ternate routes to direct cyclists to ride on other streets as designated in the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. This project would fund the purchase and insta(lation of"Bicycle Route"signs on roadways west of Argonne including Mission, Vista, Knox, Sargent, Montgomery and Liberty Avenue(fn Millwoodj. , The Spokane Valley bicycle route map i5 attached for reference. ', The City of Spokane Valley is currently designing improvements to the Argonne/Knox and i Argonne/Montgomery Intersections, These improvements will include ADA upgrades to curb ramps, intersection and signal improvements at Knox and a new NB right turn Iane at Montgomery to reduce congestion between Trent and 1-90. The project is funded with a CMAQ grant. The proposed HS[P �mprovements wi[I be coordinated witn the CMAq funded improvements to maximize the benefits to the traveEing public. Therefore countdown pedestrian signals for the intersections of Argonne with Montgomery and Knox are not inc[uded in this proposal as they wifl be part of the CMAQ project. Agency Coordinatian The City of Spokane Valley will be the lead agency and will handEe all administration of the project. Spokane Valley staff will coordinate signal work with Spokane County and oversee development of signal timfng plans with 5pokane County, City of Millwood and WSDOT. 5pokane County signal staff will make alf traffEc signal improvements in Millwood. Spokane Valley wifl purchase bike route signs and provide them to Millwood for instalfation, Millwood will also provide feedback to 5pokane Valley and 5pokane County on the new signal timing plans. 5ee the attached email from the City of Millwood with their approval to move forward with a joint appfication. The two agencies will prepare an Enterlocal agreement[f the pro�ect is selected for funding. Scheduie Receive award notification 1an 2012 �esign Spring 2012 Construction Summer-Fall 2012 S9gnal Coordination Work Fal12012 Coil�sion Anaiysis A summary of the common collislon types is shown in the table below. Along with the collision types is a summary of the corrections that would be made to reduce the collisions. City Safety Program (2d09-2015) i �� City of Spokane Valley and City of MilEwood It should be noted that another prominent collision pattern has afready been corrected in this corridor. The Argonne Road/Indiana Avenue intersection was the site of many collisions between through and left turning traffic. This movement was eliminated with the installation of a median in fate 2008, which eliminated that collis9on pattern. For analysis purposes, the foqowing collisfons shou[d be considered as already corrected: 2031007, C706792, 1872641, 1905957, 19�.�.558, 2776601, 2779882, 2903643, 2903663, and 2912603, Rear-end collis9ons occur at many of the signa[ized � �- intersections and inbetween signals due to cangestion, � : '�he proposed improvements wi[I improve signal -� coordination and corridor throughput in an effort to � _ � _ _ � . reduce the overall congestion and queuing ofvehic[es. / = � � .. 7his shou[d lead to a reduction in rear-end calfislons. � � - --� �� ' - � _ Bicycle and vehide col[lsions are common throughout � �� N the corridor. They are aften caused by cyclists rlding on � "''S`" � ��;_ � the sidewalk. Cyclists are hit by drivers turning fram side ��`"�-�;- � � ' streets and driveways,where they are not accustomed ' m � � � o to looking for cycfists. One goal of th�s praject is to sign ` , � a[ternate bicycie routes for cydists to use and ta move KA%DXftD them off the arterial streets. �.�� ,�. � Pedestrlan coi(isions primar�Ey occur at the signalized `;�� r'-�;_''_ � � . �r�- x f . intersections, 7hey are caused by pedestrians not �'��- �, *rt�.� �-�:�; : following the pedestrian signal, and by drivers not -�.=-� - � - yie[ding the right of way. Installation of pedestrian � ��,� �� s �` � � countdawn signals in Millwood will heEp reduce this -�' - collision pattern. Countdowns will be instal[ed at the "' '��` 3 � - - Spokane Val[ey locations through a separate project, t�•,, - 7�`s . ,,*� r _,�� _ _ � � '`-,� s --- �- L � 11i'}.r� 1 :7_�-}-.t�:r�- Red-light running collisians occur at most of the signals /�g�4N� on the corridor. Spokane Valiey has used signal � � � � F° . . ' coordination to effectively reduce red-[ight running fn � i ' ather parts of the City, A significant amount of time has �-- � � � ' , already been invested in signal timing in this carridor, � � . : but additional improvements could be made once the . signal controllers in Mflfwood are updated. ln addition ��ox� � - • - : Spokane VaEley staff would work to develop weekend � � , � and evening timing plans to help reduce the red Iight running. City Safety Program �2009-20�.5� , , City of 5pokane Valley and City of Mil[wood The following collisions occurred in this corridor during the 2004-2010 analysis period. We believe they are all correctable with th9s improvement, This is not a com fete anal sis of a[1 collisions in the corridor, and there may be additional col[isions that are correctable. Collisfon Date Argonne Type 5e�erity Contrlbuting Factors f�umber Intersection Correcfalale with lmprovement 3059996 12/3/08 �mpire Angle 5erious Ran red 1[ght 2706088 6/7/07 Grace Angle 5er�ous Ran red light �060535 7/14/10 Trent Hit pedacyclist 5erio�s Crossing against IigE�t 3060231 11/19/07 Em�ire Rear-end E�ident At signal 2708219 6/27/09 Knox Angle Evident Ran red light 2909439 1/4/�.D Knox Angle Evident Ran red light 2031009 5/13./06 Knox Angfe Evident Ran red light 1407856 1/29/04 lndiana Hit pedacyc[ist �vident �n sfdewalk 3090110 9/�.7/(}9 lndiana Hit pedacyclist Evident On sidewalk 1932527 11/22/04 Montgomery Rear-end Evident Stopped in traffic 2776789 8/11/07 Montgomery Hit pedacyclist Evident In crosswalk 2960041 5/6/09 Montgomery Rear-end Evident Stopped in traffic 1744346 2/20/05 Trent Angie Evident Ran red ligh# - --- ---- - - - _ _ — --- - - -- 2D31128 fi]2rQ6 Trent Rear-end ��ident Sfop�ed in tra -ic 2960025 10I13I07 Trent Hit pedacydist Evident In crosswa[k 3365211 7/18/1€l Euclid Hit pedacycl�st �v[dent On sidewalk C699417 1/2bJ08 Knox Rear-end Possible Stop�ed in traffic 2779854 3/30/07 Indiana Rear-end Possible Stapped in traffic 1407960 S/15/04 Knox Left and thro�gh Possible Ran red light 1762778 9/17/04 Knax . Rear-end . Possible Stopped in traffic - 1905970 6/6/06 Knox Left and through Possibfe Ran red light 2450635 1�./2o/as Knax Ang�e Possib[e Ran red light 2708076 4/3/07 Knox Angle Possib�e Ran red [ight 1911377 7/6/05 Liberty Hit pedacyclist Possible �n sidewalk 1407446 2/27/0� Montgomery Angle Possible Ran red [ight 1407514 3/A�/�4 Montgomery Rear-end Possible Stopped in traffic 2685543 4/4/D7 Montgomery Rear-end Passible Stoppe� in traffic 1125b1� 9/3/Q4 Trent Rear-end Possible Sto�ped in traffic 2882931 4/17/08 Knox Rear-end Possible Stopped in traffic C714949 1/2/09 Knox Rear-end Possible Sto�ped in traffic 2450883 8/16/06 Buckeye Rear-end Possible Stopped En traffie 1905486 2�16/�6 Grace Rear-end Possible Stopped in traffic 2450684 10/26/06 Dalton Rear-end Possible 5topped in traffic 1980�.75 5/6/05 Grace Ang[e Poss�ble Ran red light 17b2287 6/2/�5 Ernpire Rear-end � Possible Stcspped in traffic 2g12742 10/18/Cl9 Euc[id Rear-end Possible Stapped in traffic City 5afety Program �2009-20�.5} r i Grant AppEication Cost Estimate ProJect Nama: A�gonne-Notth l-y Joint Project wlfh Millwood a�ri�� l..l�J T Prepared By: IrlgO NOtB,P.E. �/��p� preparation oaEe. OCt 27,267! �r �' Yd5�0T5TD. UNIT OF PLANNE� E5TIMATE�UN[T EST[h1A7E�17EM REMR SP£C. WSDOTSTO,q ITEh7DESCRIPFIOH tdEASUR� QVANTITY PAICE PiiICE 1 1-�9.7 OOQ7 MOBILl7A7€ON L,S. 1 $ - $ - 2 1-10.3 6979 PROJECTTEMf'ORARYT{�AFFICCONTROI. L5. 1 S 3,a00.00 $ 3,000 3 8-21 6890 PEftMAN�NTSIGNING ERCH 20 $ 250.00 $ 6000 a SIGNAE COUN7S AND TIN3ING L.S. 1 $ 10,000,00 $ � 10�00 5 CABINE7 FOUNDA710N EACH 3 S 1,000,09 S 3 006 6 SIGNAL CABItJ�.TS �P.CH 3 S 15,000.00 S 45 000 7 SIGNAL CONTFtOLL�FtS EACH 3 S s aao.00 S 9 D0a e RAD10 R�PEAFER LS. 1 $ 8,000.00 w� 5,Q00 8 DMS RAD305 EACH 3 S 6,0OO.OD $ 15,OOD 10 ANTENNA� �.ACH 1 S 2 DD0.00 S 2,OQ0 1i ETHER3VETSW[TCHES EACH 3 $ 1000.00 S 3,000 12 IN37ALL COUNTDOWN P�D�3TRIAN SIGNALS EACH 24 $ 500.00 $ 'I2,000 73 INSTALL FOUNDATIONS CABI�IETS,f2AC?IOS L.S. 1 S 20,OOO.DO $ 20,000 � FOTAL CONSTRUC7lON�S7IMATE $ 932 40Q Confingency(46°/,} S 19,800 Intlatfon Adf ustment Faator{a%1yr) i yeafs S b,280_ Constructfon 5uG-Tofel 5 157,680 P�-P58�('[0°/a} $ 95,710 CE.-(5%aJ $ 7�B6D R[ght Of 1Nay S - TOTAL PROJECT @5TENfATE $ 980,644 Cost Estlmate Aes�mpfions: P� i5 790. Bike route stgnage at 0.25 mlle(ntervals. ROW $ One sign each side of street,so e per mile. CN 5 164,930 Bike rouie and arraw esUmata atS100 eacri Post and insial]esilmaied at S�5D each TOTAL S 180,64D Labor ior cabinef replacement Includes pouring the base, � removing oId and installfng new cabtne� Rev�lring the new ' ' cabinel. 3 days for caGlnet Added 1 extra day Tor radlo fnsial�. All by Cvunty slaff, Assume 3 paople,4 days of labor per IniersecGon, Rata for a tech 3 ls$58mour fhen add 24%markup. Signa!coordinailon primarily fo be completed Gy Gity staff. Sfaff time is not inGuded In thfs esBmate. 61ke B1vd.Route; Miles Vlsta irom EuGld ta Knox 1 Knox-Mansfield D.5 Euclfd-PAargeurite U.5 M€ssfon from Park fo Vlsta o.5 2,5 P:1Public WorkslCapital ProjectsVProJect Fundfng Appllcatlons12011 AppllcaiionslHSIP City Safery ProgramlHSIP Cost EstMsx 1D12712011 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 11, 2012 Department Director Approval: � Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business �new business ❑public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 12-028, Multi-Family Regulations GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A.106; SVMC 17.80.150 and 1930.040 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: First Reading held November 13, 2012 BACKGROUND: In the past,the City has processed some contentious,privately initiated, site-specific map amendments through the Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment process. As a result, staff has researched changes to the SVMC to mitigate the impacts of multi-family development when it is adjacent to single-family development. The proposed city initiated te�t amendment would modify SVMC 19.40.070, 19.40.080, 19.60.070 and 19.60.080 to include standards for multi-family development when it is adjacent to single-family development. On October 11, 2012,the Planning Commission voted 6-0 to advance the Findings and Recommendations to the City Council. On October 23,2012, staff provided an administrative report to City CounciL Council consensus was to move the Planning Commission's recommendation to a First Ordinance Reading. On November 13,2012, City Council held a First Ordinance Reading. Council approved a motion to advance the ordinance to a Second Reading. OPTIONS: Proceed as proposed, or as modified; or direct staff further. RECOMMENDED ACTION/MOTION: I move to approve Ordinance 12-028 regarding multi-family regulations. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None STAFF CONTACT: Mike Basinger,AICP, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance 12-028 DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 12-028 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON AMENDING SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS 19.40.070, 19.40.080, 19.60.070 AND 19.60.080 TO INCLUDE STANDARDS FOR MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT WHEN IT IS ADJACENT TO SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT,AND OTHER MATTERS RELATED THERETO. WHEREAS, on September 25, 2007, the City of Spokane Valley (City) adopted Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Title 19,pursuant to Ordinance 07-015; and WHEREAS, on October 28, 2007, SVMC Title 19 became effective; and WHEREAS, such regulations are authorized by RCW 36.70A; and WHEREAS, the amendments set forth below are consistent with the goals and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, on September 5, 2012, the Washington State Department of Commerce was notified pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, providing an expedited 14-day notice of intent to adopt amendments to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, on September 13,2012, the Planning Commission held a study session; and WHEREAS, on September 21, 2012 and September 28, 2012,notice of the Planning Commission public hearing was published in the Valley News Herald; and WHEREAS, SVMC 19.40.070, 19.40.080, 19.60.070 and 19.60.080, as amended, bear a substantial relation to the public health, safety and welfare and protection of the environment and WHEREAS, on October 11, 2012, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, received evidence, information, public testimony, and a staff report with a recommendation followed by deliberations and provided a recommendation; and WHEREAS, on October 23, 2012, City Council reviewed the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, on November 8, 2012, the Planning Commission approved the findings and recommendations; and WHEREAS, on November 13, 2012, City Council considered a first ordinance reading to adopt the proposed amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley do ordain as follows: Section 1. Pumose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend Spokane Valley Municipal Code sections 19.40.070, 19.40.080, 19.60.070 and 19.60.080. Section 2. Findin�s. The City Council acknowledges that the Planning Commission conducted appropriate investigation and study, held a public hearing on the application and recommends approval of the amendment. The City Council hereby adopts the findings of the Planning Commission, specifically that Ordinance 12-028 Page 1 of 3 DRAFT Growth Mana�ement Act Policies 1. The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) provides that each city shall adopt a comprehensive land use plan and development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan. Countywide Plannin�Policies 2. The Countywide Planning Policies (CWPP) are based on principles developed through a lengthy citiaen participation process. One of the guiding principles coming out of that process was the importance of protecting neighborhood character. For most citizens, neighborhood character is one of the primary ingredients in their perceived quality of life. It is the intent of the CWPP to maintain neighborhood character and prevent neighborhoods from suffering the negative effects of growth. Ci .ty of Spokane Valley Goals and Policies 3. The City of Spokane Valley has adopted goals and policies consistent with the GMA and adopted CWPP. a. Goal LUG-1: Preserve and protect the character of Spokane Valley's residential neighborhoods. b. Policy LUP-1.1: Maintain and protect the character of existing and future residential neighborhoods through the development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations and j oint planning. c. Policy LUP-12: Protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent non- residential uses and/or higher intensity uses through the development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations and joint planning. d. Policy LUP-13: Review and revise as necessary, existing land use regulations to provide for innovation and fle�bility in the design of new residential developments, accessory dwelling units and in-�11 development. e. Policy LUP-2.4: Residential development should be designed to provide privacy and common open space. Open space areas shall be proportionate to the size of the residential development. f. Policy HP-13: Establish development regulations and incentives for greater diversity of housing types, costs and designs, that may include bonus incentives, clustering, and transfer of development rights. Section 3. Spokane Valley Municipal Code sections 19.40.070, 19.40.080, 19.60.070 and 19.60.080 are amended to include the following requirements to the Supplemental Permitted Use Regulations: Multi-familv adjacent to Sin�le-Family Residential uses or zoning a. A relational hei�ht limit to sin�le residential uses or zone is established (see Fi�ure 1) i. Where new multi-family development is abuttin� an adjacent parcel with a sin�le-family use or zone, the hei�ht of the new multi-family develo�ment may not increase b,� than 45 de�rees when measured from the an�le that ori�inates at 25 feet above the applicable property line (creatin� a 1 to 1 hei�ht-to-setback ratio) to the abuttin� sin�le- family use or aone. b. The minimum setback from a sin�le-familv use or aone shall be 10 feet from�ro�e , line. Ordinance 12-028 Page 2 of 3 DRAFT Figure 1: Relational Height Limit I - - ;�:-� _,-��.r� ��i,,� I ��i�ar�� a�kw � i r:.,:��_��.r.�n!�� l iHr��_ii,� � � � � I -- -- , � - � I - I ; � I �I f I �-- � Section 4. All other provisions of Spokane Valley Municipal Code Title 19 not specifically referenced herein shall remain in full force and effect. Section 5. Severabilitv. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect �ve days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provided by law. Passed by the City Council this day of December,2012. ATTEST: Mayor, Thomas E. Towey City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge Approved as to Form: Of�ce of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 12-028 Page 3 of 3 ATTACHMENT A FINDING,S AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THG S�OKANE VALI.EY PLANNING COMMISSION October 11,2412 The follo�ving findings are consistent with the P3anning Cammission's decision to recommend approval. Bacltgj•ound: 1. Spokane Valley developnte►tt regutatior3s were adopted in Septe�nber 2007 and beca��ie effective on OctobeR•28,2007. 2, A proposed city initiated code text amendment p�•oposing to amend Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC} I9.40.070, 19.40.080, 19,60.070 and 19.60.080 to incl�ide standa�•ds far ini�]ti-famiiy de�eIopment��hen it is adjacei�t to single-family de�elopment, 3. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on Octobe�' I 1, 2012. The Plan�fing Cojnmission appi•o�ed the following amendment to SVMC 19.40.070, 19.40.080, 19.60.070 and 19,60,080. Pla��ning Commission Findings: 1. Compli�nce with SVMC 17.80.15�F Approval Criteria a. The proposed city initiated code text amendment is consistent witl�the applicable provisions of the Co�nprehensi�e Plan; Fi�id iug(s): i. Goa1 LL1G-1: P��eser�e and pt•otect the ciiaracte�• af Spokane Valley's residential neighborhoods. ii. PoIicy LUP-1.1: Maintain and pi�otect the charactej• of existing and future resident�al neigEtborhoods through the develop�nent and enforcement of the City's land use i�egulations and joint planning. � iii. Policy LUP-1.2; Profect residential a�'eas from impacts of adjacent nornresidential uses andlor higher intensity i�ses througl�the developmer3t and enforcement of the City's la��d use reguiations and joint planning. iv. Policy LUP-1.3: Re�ie�v a►id re�ise as necessaiy, eYisting land use regulations to p�'o�ide for innovation and flexibility iti the design of ne�� residentiai de�elopments, accessory dweiling tinits and in-fitt development. v. Policy LUP-2.4: Residential development slfouid be designed to provide pri�acy a�fd common open space. Open space areas shall Ue proportia�iate ta tlie size of the residential de�elopment. �[. Palicy HP-1.3: Establish developmenT regt�lations and 'utcentives foi• greater di�ersity of Itottsing types, costs and designs, that may inclttde Uonus ince�fti�es, clustering, and tra��sfei• � of develop�nent rights. I b. The p�•oposed city initiated code te;ct a�nendment bears a s��bstantial relatioi� to public health, I safety,weIfare, and protection of tl�e environment; Findii�g(s); i. The proposed city initiated code text amendment will assist in m[tigating tlie impacts to sittgle-family residentiaE development when it is adjacent to netiv multi-family develop�nent, Piudings ancf RecommeEidations of the Spoka�ie Valley Planning Cornmissio�� Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT A ii. The public health,safety,welfare,and protect[ott of the en�ironme�tt are fi�rthered by ensuring that the City's developme�it�•egulations are consistent witi�goals and policies in tl�e adopted Comprehensive Plan. 2. Conelusioa�(s): a. The proposed cily iuitiated code text a�nendment is consistent witi�the CiTy's adopted Compeehensi�e Plan and The appro�al criteria confained in the SVMC I7,80.150F. b. The Gro�vtit Managen�e�lt Act(GMA)stipi�lates that the comprahensive land usa pla►i and development�•agulations sltall ba subjact to contii�uing revie�v and evaluatio�t by tha City. Recou�meitd�tions: Tlte Spokane Va[ley Planning Commission ttierefo�'e ��eco�nmends appro�a] to the City Couticil of p�'oposed city ii�itiaked code teYt an�endmei�ts to SVMC 19.40.070, 19,40.080, 19,60.070 and 19.60.080 as attachad. App • ve tl�is 11'f'day of Oc ber,2D12 1 � y�C�'C�- _ Bill Bates,Ci�airman - ATTEST . Dea na Griflith,Administr Ass�s ant Findings and Recommendations of thc Spokanc Valley Planning Commission Page 2 oF 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 11, 2012 Department Director Approval: � Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business � new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second reading Proposed Ordinance 12-029 adopting regulation of commercial vehicles GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 9.05.010; WAC 308-330-462; RCW 46.61.570; RCW 46.44.080. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: At the May 29, 2012 City Council meeting, Council received an administrative report on potentially restricting semi-truck parking in residential zones and at the June 26, 2012 Council meeting, received a follow up administrative report from the perspective of the professional trucking community; September 4, 2012 administrative report; October 23, 2012 administrative report; November 13, 2012 first reading of Ordinance 12-029. BACKGROUND: At the direction of Council, staff has been working on providing potential code options for regulating commercial truck traffic in residential neighborhoods. Additionally, staff has attempted to aggregate regulations regarding similar topics into one place, a new chapter of the City Code. Since staff last presented proposed Ordinance 12-029 on November 13, staff made several revisions. First, after further discussion between staff, a revision was made to section 6, regarding idling commercial vehicles. The language limiting the effect of the Code provision to the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. the following day was removed so it was consistent with what the Council had identified as the goal — removal of idling in residential neighborhoods. Council had expressed concern with idling during the day as well due to noise and fumes. Staff believes the revised language accurately reflects Council's stated concerns now. Second, the language relating to operation of refrigeration units now includes commercial trucks and trailers, instead of just trailers. This change was made after further discussion between staff of other potential vehicles that may contain refrigeration units. For example, various commercial trucks having such units make deliveries of frozen or refrigerated food in residential neighborhoods on a daily basis. The new proposed language accounts for those types of deliveries. OPTIONS: (a) adopt Ordinance 12-029 as drafted; (b) request that staff make additional changes to the draft Code provisions; or (c) do nothing. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move that we approve Ordinance 12-029 adopting a new SVMC chapter 9.30 relating to commercial truck regulations as proposed. 1 BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None anticipated. STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney; Inga Note, Senior Traffic Engineer ATTACHMENTS: (1) Proposed Ordinance 12-029 relating to commercial truck traffic issues; (2) Map showing existing "No Trucks" and "Local Delivery Only" signs posted by Spokane County; (3) Picture of a "No Trucks" sign and "Local Delivery Only" sign from Knox Avenue. 2 DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 12-029 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON,ADOPTING CHAPTER 9.30 OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO MISCELLANEOUS VEHICLE REGULATIONS; AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley previously adopted several provisions relating to vehicle regulations on the rights-of-way in the City, which were dispersed within the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC); and WHEREAS, the City has determined that it is appropriate to protect the life, health, and safety of its citizens to adopt additional vehicle regulations regarding idling of commercial vehicles in residentially zoned areas, operation of refrigeration units associated with commercial truck trailers, and operation of commercial trucks in excess of 10,000 pounds on certain City roads. Such regulations are within the police power granted to cities by Article XI, Section 11 of the Washington State Constitution; and WHEREAS, the City desires to aggregate the existing vehicle regulations along with the new regulations in one chapter of the SVMC for ease of use by the public. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Washington ordains as follows: Section 1. Ado�tin�S�okane Vallev Munici�al Code 930.010 Re a� rdin�r�ose and Authority. Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 9.30.010 is hereby adopted as follows: SVMC 930.010 -Purpose and authority. The purpose of this chapter is to regulate the kinds and classes of traffic, parking, and vehicular noise on certain streets within the City. This regulation is undertaken in order to promote the efficient movement of vehicles and conduct of commerce, while preserving the integrity of residential zones. The provisions of this chapter are adopted under the authority granted by RCW 46.44.080 and SVMC 9.05.040, and are to promote the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the City. Section 2. Ado�tin�S�okane Vallev Munici�al Code 930.020 Re a� rdin� Definitions. Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 9.30.020 is hereby adopted as follows: SVMC 930.020 -De�nitions. Terms used within this chapter are defined as follows: "Commercial Vehicle" means that term as defined in RCW 46.04140, as now or hereafter amended. "Local Delivery" means providing local or neighborhood deliveries or services to points upon such streets or roads. "Residential area" means the following zoning districts, as delineated on the official zoning map of the City: Ordinance 12-029 Adopting SVMC 9.30-Miscellaneous Vehicle Regulations P1g0 1 Of 4 DRAFT R-1 Single-Family Residential Estate District. R-2 Single-Family Residential Suburban District. R-3 Single-Family Residential District. R-4 Single-Family Residential Urban District. MF-1 Multifamily Medium Density Residential District. MF-2 Multifamily High Density Residential District. "Residential Street" means any street or alleyway within the City which is not designated on the City's arterial road map. "Trailer" means that term as defined in RCW 46.04.620, as now adopted or hereafter amended. "Vehicle" means that term as defined in RCW 46.04.670, as now adopted or hereafter amended. Section 3. Adoptin� Spokane Valley Municipal Code 930.030 Re�ardin� "No Trucks" Si�ns. Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 930.030 is hereby adopted as follows: SVMC 930.030—"No Trucks" Signs. A. Any street upon which a"No Trucks" sign is posted shall be permanently closed to all commercial vehicle travel having a gross licensed weight of 10,000 pounds or more, except for the purpose of providing local or neighborhood deliveries or services to points between the posted signs. The City may, for clarification purposes, also post optional "Local Delivery Only" signs in conjunction with"No Trucks" signs. B. The following vehicles are exempt from the provisions of SVMC 930.030: 1. All vehicles owned, contracted, or operated by governmental agencies. 2. Emergency vehicles and solid waste disposal vehicles. 3. Electrical, water, telephone, and natural gas utility providers responding for installations,maintenance, or incident repairs. 4. Vehicles actively used for the purpose of delivering materials to be used in the actual and bona fide repair, alteration, remodeling, or construction of any building or structure upon a residential street. 5. Trailers currently used at a specific location within a residential zone for the purpose of assisting or providing services such as construction, carpentry, plumbing, or landscaping to a residence or location upon a residential street. 6. Recreational vehicles including motor homes, campers, and travel trailers. 7. Vehicles belonging to, or operated by, persons permanently residing within the City limits, as evidenced by the owner's or operator's address on file with the Washington State Department of Licensing. To qualify for this exemption, the vehicle must be used for commuting to work at places located inside or outside of the City limits. 8. Any commercial vehicle belonging to a business located between the posted "No Trucks" signs. Ordinance 12-029 Adopting SVMC 9.30-Miscellaneous Vehicle Regulations P1g0 Z Of 4 DRAFT C. The location of signs reading "No Trucks" shall be established through adoption of a master "No Trucks" sign schedule, which shall be adopted and may be amended from time-to-time by separate resolution. Any such alteration shall be made on the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, be reasonable and safe, and in the interest of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of this City. "No Trucks" signs shall become effective upon the placement of such signs, and shall cease at such time as the signs are removed by the City. All signs placed pursuant to this section shall conform to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for streets and highways for the state of Washington. Section 4. Ado�tin�S�okane Vallev Munici�al Code 9.30.040 Re�ardin� Liability of Owner for Violations. Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 930.040 is hereby adopted as follows: SVMC 930.040—Liability of Owner for Violations. If the person operating the commercial vehicle at the time a citation for violation of SVMC 930.030 is issued is not the owner of the vehicle, then the issuing officer may also issue a citation for the owner of the vehicle in addition to the operator pursuant to RCW 46.44.120, as adopted or amended. Further, the operator of the commercial vehicle is authorized to accept the citation and to execute the Promise to Appear on behalf of the owner of the vehicle. Section 5. Adoptin� Spokane Valley Municipal Code 9.30.050 Re�ardin�Excessive Noise From Vehicle Audio System Prohibited. Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 930.050 is hereby adopted as follows: SVMC 9.30.050—Excessive Noise From Vehicle Audio System Prohibited. The sound from any motor vehicle audio system such as tape players, radio, and compact disc players at volumes so high as to be audible greater than 50 feet from the vehicle itself is prohibited. Section 6. Adoptin� Spokane Valley Municipal Code 9.30.060 Re�ardin� Idlin� of Commercial Vehicles Limited in Residentially-Zoned Areas. Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 930.060 is hereby adopted as follows: SVMC 930.060—Idling of Commercial Vehicles Limited in Residentially-Zoned Areas. No person shall cause a commercial vehicle to idle in any residentially-zoned area for more than 15 consecutive minutes, or more than 15 minutes total in any single calendar day. Section 7. Ado�tin�S�okane Vallev Munici�al Code 9.30.070 Re��O�eratin� Refri�eration Units on Certain Vehicles Limited in Residentially-Zoned Areas. Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 9.30.070 is hereby adopted as follows: SVMC 930.070 — Operating Refrigeration Units on Certain Vehicles Limited in Residentially- Zoned Areas. Between the hours of 10:00 p.m. any day and 7:00 a.m. the next day, no person shall operate a refrigeration unit on a commercial truck or trailer in a residentially-zoned area, except in the performance of a local delivery. Ordinance 12-029 Adopting SVMC 9.30-Miscellaneous Vehicle Regulations P1g0 3 Of 4 DRAFT Section 8. Ado�tin�S�okane Vallev Munici�al Code 930.080 Re�ardin�Violations -Penalty. Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 930.080 is hereby adopted as follows: SVMC 930.080—Violations—Penalty. Any person violating or failing to comply with any provisions of this chapter shall be subj ect to a Class 1 civil infraction pursuant to Chapter 7.80 RCW. Section 9. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 10. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect �ve days after the date of publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City. Passed this day of December, 2012. Mayor, Thomas E. Towey ATTEST: City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge Approved As To Form: Of�ce of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 12-029 Adopting SVMC 9.30-Miscellaneous Vehicle Regulations P1g0 4 Of 4 � � � r +�"_ ,�r-� ♦i - ,• , - � � . � � 4�� ,j� if�� M � �� " � �� - � � ` •� �...�� a: .�, '�►; - , � ' � ` � '' � : , � ' � r �, .�. w ' .�.° .. - '1,.J � �, �. . SPEED � +�} M �y`�- � _ ' � LIMIT 1'` " �� w�. � :�.. . . . � ',�._ , .:�' � s._ `c � ,�' o � �.i ��,\ „� M ' �p�' ti ti� � -� �'� � �c `�' . XyN �` �- yi ,� _ �y�� 4 �� y �"" '`� ,r�,.�''�:: . ev- ,.,, �. � -� , . i '� c. +' ` , �. --- �� ` �. - . � _`' •�, _.. � �`. J �� . .../'' � i: •� " - . � � :..� ,�. � r � �► �� 1 ; � � � ,��r I LOCAL � * . , � I �_ �t �� i �ELIVERY : �' . �< ` �A► � r�'� � ��' 0 N LY r� - ; ` ,� � �'!(`°`�'��. ',.-� "�:.- � : k � �- r i I �` • � _• ...,- _ ,_ � � _ r � � ......_--� _ � . - . � � ! � " �i�� ` -� i . . .} � �, � ;�,: J�,� . �.., . i s ^ � •t.. � ` , � y ,� . , ��.. �� . � , - r . e�f. � /` . � f - � ' wt�' � ,•. y...t �ti e--r, ' � 'i'�'_,< ,4 � �.:� .� � . . � _ + �� . ��. . � .,� `° �.. r~�Y �� r,t + �� 71 N{`T�� „}. +� ,:" } • � . ¢�t .�; �,� � � � �' " i tY-'o \��. �I`>I��.lr� . � �r '+ �J�`". .. fx7�• ♦ !� - ,�"` � .�! ! �.'��•,�� .' „«.��• � ` . �� _,..5{ - � �+rY-.� r y�� i u''t �� v T. � 'y�.,. ,, �i e �,.. _ g. A� ' . � o o ne Valle —� �'�� City f Sp ka y � IVo Truck Zones � � � �� .�� ,.�—� �� `'�� wm�,� _ �,.� � �� & � � �..� � � � �� ` �,RO,o�.�� ea�.o�..� � � � � B � � ��,�,� $ �P�� g � ��.� �,�-.� � �„, � -T § ��K �.�.�. � � � � p g �,m�� M�� p � � a .M^� a s � a�,.� .,�.� a � $ e,�.� � � em��. ,M.� � � :$ „m,�r. "'"$ g � 3 L � fi � 3 � � s�m�n�:� z��c uuo.rc '"'°•`E � LEGEND � No rRU�K zor�E „�.,, Drawn By MP Date:� C'IYy Of Spokane Valley � SPOKANE vqLLEY�PROJEC�Na- - Designea By:_Date:„nzn°°s �epartment of Public Works ''^N SHEET SCALE 11707 E. Spra9ue Ave. Suite 106 �DI1Alle City of Spokane Valley HoalzoNTn�: �-- SPOKANE VALLEY, WA. 492os ��'�,-11 1 of 1 VERTICAL x/n�� (509)921-1000 �cui�' No�rrsuck zouES - - CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 11, 2012 Department Director Approval: � Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business � new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed Resolution 12-012 City Council Draft Restoration Plan GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Shoreline Management Act (SMA) RCW 90.58 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Numerous discussions regarding local implementation of the SMA under RCW 90.58. BACKGROUND: The URS Corporation Consultants, assisted by City staff, have completed a Draft Restoration Plan for the Shoreline Master Program Update. The Restoration Plan is the fourth phase of the Shoreline Update Process, and is required by the SMA. The Restoration Plan establishes overall goals and objectives for Citywide shoreline restoration efforts. The Planning Commission review was completed over three meetings beginning on October 11, 2012. A public hearing was conducted on October 25, 2012, and deliberations were completed on November 8, 2012. The Commission voted 5-0 to recommend acceptance of the Draft Restoration Plan. Contract special counsel Tadas Kisielius also completed a review of the Draft Restoration Plan to identify areas where the draft plan may exceed, meet, or fall below the state guidelines. He provided input that was incorporated in to the draft during the development stage. Mr. Kisielius attended the December 4th meeting to answer questions. No changes were requested. OPTIONS: (1) Approve the attached document as presented; (2) Approve with modifications; (3) Send the draft back to the Planning Commission; (4) Request additional information from staff. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move to approve Resolution 12-012 informally accepting the City Council Draft Restoration Plan. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None STAFF CONTACT: Lori Barlow, AICP, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Resolution #12-012 City Council Draft Restoration Plan DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 12-012 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, ACCEPTING THE DRAFT RESTORATION PLAN FOR THE SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM, AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS,the City initiated a Shoreline Master Program Update process in 2009; and WHEREAS, on October 27, 2009, the City Council reviewed a public participation plan for the Shoreline Management Program Update; and WHEREAS,the public participation plan specifies the public involvement plan overview; and WHEREAS, the Shoreline Management Program Update process specifies that individual components of the Shoreline Management Program Update will be reviewed separately and accepted by Council resolution, recognizing that as each component is completed, it will be used as a base upon which to develop the remainder of the Shoreline Management Program; and WHEREAS, on November 5, 2009, the first Shoreline Master Program Update open house was conducted at which the Shoreline Management Program Update process was explained to interested parties; and WHEREAS, on September 14, 2010, the first component of the Shoreline Master Program Update,the Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report,was accepted by Resolution 10-014; and WHEREAS, on August 14, 2012, the second component of the Shoreline Master Program Update,the Goals and Policies,was accepted by Resolution 12-004; and WHEREAS, on N ovember 13, 2012, the third component of the Shoreline Master Program Update,the Environment Designations,was accepted by Resolution 12-007; and WHEREAS, the fourth component of the Shoreline Master Program Update is the Restoration Plan; and WHEREAS, on September 17, 2012, the Restoration Plan was sent to the Technical Review Group for review; and WHEREAS on October 5, 2012, the Restoration Plan was issued for public review, and a notice published in the Spokane Valley Herald announcing the public hearing; and WHEREAS, on October 11, 2012,the Planning Commission conducted a study session where the Restoration Plan was presented and discussed; and WHEREAS, on October 25, 2012,the Planning Commission conducted a properly noticed public hearing on the Draft Environment Designations; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission received public comments, including written comments, and no revisions were made to the document; and Resolurion 12-012,Accepting SMP Draft Restoration Plan Page 1 of 2 DRAFT WHEREAS, on November 8, 2012, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended that the Draft Restoration Plan be formally accepted; and WHEREAS, this Resolution informally accepts the proposed Draft Restoration Plan recommended by the Planning Commission, and it is anticipated that additional revisions may occur prior to formal adoption; and WHEREAS, the City Council Draft Restoration Plan is anticipated to be formally adopted by Ordinance at a later date as a part of the complete Shoreline Master Program. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County,Washington, as follows: The City Council Draft Restoration Plan, attached as E�ibit A,is hereby accepted. Approved this day of December, 2012. ATTEST: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Thomas E. Towey, Mayor Approved as to form: Office of the City Attorney Resolurion 12-012,Accepting SMP Draft Restoration Plan Page 2 of 2 Exhibit A SHORELINE RESTORATION PLAN (City Council DRAFT) City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update SP.ptPiTT1UPiT 1/, GOIG (ON2gZ11aIDNaft) NOVeffibeT g, 2�I2 (PlannangCommtssaonRecommendation) �eCeffibeP 1 l, 2�12 (Resolzrtion#12-0012) , � ��''_ ��;:� '��`'`� a�s`� A��- � � � �,= r, � � �' ,� �� 't�' ��' a �-��,�'a�.+�' �� > �.t� � � �s� ,....��+��.i. ..»a�.;:�:�i�r. -p� r'• - i�. .. _ -*�, _ _ . �x' ,�,`:batst%�r,<•� .� . s i.` ,•Ut.�s�� . - . , � _ . . . - ° � ��c>s 3.',. . T�. . ' r t. ^.�r...�_-'.,�k_.__,' r�r•.�, i ._:�� °` _ '- �� _ � :. Prepared for: City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department Spokane Valley City Hall 11707 E. Sprague Ave., Suite 106 Spokane Valley, Washington 99206 Prepared bv: Noah Herlocker, PWS URS Corporation 111 S.W. Columbia, Suite 1500 Portland, Oregon 97201-5814 URS Project Number 36298174 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section1 Introduction........................................................................................................................1 1.1 Shoreline Restoration in the SMP Update Process (Overview)............... 1-1 1.2 Context for the City of Spokane Valley................................................... 1-1 1.3 Required Elements of Restoration Planning for SMP Updates ............... 1-3 Section 2 Restoration Goals and Supporting Policies....................................................................2 Section 3 Existing and Ongoing Projects and Programs ...............................................................3 3.1 Summary of Limiting Factors..................................................................3-1 3.2 Existing and Ongoing Projects and Programs .........................................3-2 3.3 Additional Projects and Programs Needed to Achieve Shoreline RestorationGoals.....................................................................................3-6 Section 4 Prioritization Methodology...............................................................................................4 Section 5 Restoration Opportunities................................................................................................5 5.1 Programmatic Restoration Opportunities ................................................ 5-1 5.2 Site-specific Restoration Opportunities...................................................5-2 5.3 Conceptual Restoration Approaches........................................................5-8 Section 6 Implementation Plan .........................................................................................................6 6.1 Potential Restoration Partners.................................................................. 6-1 6.2 Potential Sources of Funding...................................................................6-3 6.3 Timeline and Benchmarks for Implementing Restoration Plan...............6-5 Section 7 Monitoring, Maintenance, and Adaptive Management...................................................7 7.1 Monitoring Plan....................................................................................... 7-1 7.2 Maintenance................................................................................................... Section8 References.........................................................................................................................9 City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan, Dec. 11, ZO�ZP:\Clerk�,4gendaPackets for 2\Item 4 CC DRAFT COSV SMP Restoration Plan Dec 11 2012.doc 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Tables Table 1: Required Elements of Restoration Planning for SMP Updates Table 2: Summary of Factors Limiting the Proper Functioning Condition of the COSV's SMA-Regulated Waters. Table 3: Restoration Priority Scoring Criteria Table 4: Shoreline Restoration Opportunities Table 5: Existing Partnership Opportunities Table 6: Timeline and Benchmarks Figures Figure 1: Proj ect Vicinity Figure 2: Shoreline Restoration Opportunity Index Map Figure 3a-3c Shoreline Restoration Opportunities Appendices Appendix A: Representative Photographs City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan, Dec. 11, ZO�ZP:\Clerk�,4gendaPackets for 2\Item 4 CC DRAFT COSV SMP Restoration Plan Dec 11 2012.doc 11 Acronyms ALEA Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account CIP Capital Improvement Project COSV Ciry of Spokane Valley DIP Detailed Implementation Plan DNR Washington Department of Natural Resources Ecology Washington Department of Ecology GIS Geographical Information Systems INLT Inland Northwest Land Trust IPM Integrated Pest Management LWD Large Woody Debris NPCC Northwest Power and Conservation Council OHWM Ordinary High Water Mark REI Recreational Equipment Incorporated ROW Right-of-Way SCD Spokane Conservation District SMA Shoreline Management Act SMP Shoreline Master Program SSP Spokane Subbasin Plan State Parks Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission TMDL Total MaYimum Daily Load URS URS Corporation (author) WAC Washington Administrative Code WDFW Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife WRIA Water Resource Inventory Area City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan, Dec. 11, 2012 111 SECTIONONE INTRODUCTION 1.1 SHORELINE RESTORATION IN THE SMP UPDATE PROCESS (OVERVIEW) Under the Washington State Shoreline Management Act (SMA), each city and county with "shorelines of the state" must adopt a Shoreline Master Program (SMP) based on state laws and rules but tailored to the specific geographic, economic, and environmental needs of the community. The primary goal that must be addressed in an SMP update is how to achieve "no net loss of ecological shoreline functions necessary to sustain shoreline natural resources" (Ecology 2004). This shoreline restoration plan describes actions intended to compensate for anticipated future shoreline habitat degradation associated with development and increased land use pressure. Incorporating shoreline restoration planning into the SMP update process allows the City of Spokane Valley (COSV) to balance anticipated shoreline habitat degradation and enhancement in a manner that maintains the overall existing ecological condition of shorelines. Within the COSV, only the Spokane River shorelines meet the definition of "shorelines of statewide significance." Additionally, all waters over 20 acres in area fall under the jurisdiction of the SMA as "waters of the state." As such, all areas within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark(OHWM) of Shelley Lake are also regulated under the SMA and considered in the COSV's SMP updates. Two active gravel mine pits have exposed the aquifer resulting in areas of water greater than 20 acres. However, as active mine pits are regulated under the Washington Department of Natural Resources (DNR), these features are not addressed in this plan. Updating the SMP involves several elements, including a baseline inventory of regulated shoreline areas, an assessment of key issues and opportunities for improvement within such areas, and a restoration plan to provide guidance for carrying out restoration in a comprehensive manner. The baseline characterization and the assessment of key issues and opportunities have been completed by URS Corporation (URS) in coordination with the COSV's Planning Department. These efforts were documented in a report titled City of Spokane T�alley Shoreline Master Program Update, Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report(URS 2010). This restoration plan establishes overall goals and objectives for citywide shoreline restoration efforts. It addresses degraded areas and impaired ecological functions identified in the inventory and analysis report, identifies and prioritizes restoration opportunities, and prescribes generalized treatment options for various restoration scenarios. The plan also identifies current and ongoing programs that contribute to achieving these goals, as well as additional projects or programs necessary for success. Lastly, this plan seeks to develop a draft implementation strategy, including funding options, proposed timelines, an adaptive management strategy, and benchmarks. The plan is based on the inventory and analysis report and a review of other plans and assessments aimed at improving the ecological health of the Spokane River and Shelley Lake. The term "restoration" has many definitions, both scientific and regulatory. For the purpose of this plan, restoration is defined as: The reestablishment or upgrading of impaired ecological shoreline processes or functions. This may be accomplished through measures including, but not limited to, revegetation, removal of intrusive shoreline structures and removal or treatment of toxic materials. Restoration does not imply a requirement for returning the shoreline City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan, Dec. 11,2012 1-1 SECTIONONE INTRODUCTION area to aboriginal or pre-European settlement conditions. (Washington Administrative Code [WAC] 173-26-020(27)) Under the SMP, the COSV's role in shoreline restoration includes collaborative planning, regulation, preservation of high qualiry shoreline areas, and aiding community efforts to restore degraded portions of COSV's shorelines. A well-designed restoration plan can help local governments meet the "no net loss" standard of the SMP Guidelines. Restoration planning must, therefore, include some form of monitoring to ensure that intended restoration actions are offsetting the expected loss of function that will occur from incremental impacts sustained over time (Ecology 2010a). 1.2 CONTEXT FOR THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY This plan provides a framework for restoration of the COSV's SMA-regulated shorelines. Specifically, it describes how the COSV plans to develop and monitor a restoration program as part of its SMP. Upon acceptance by the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology), the COSV will oversee the implementation,progress, and monitoring of this restoration plan. The COSV's role in the restoration of shorelines will focus on the fostering, coordinating, and documenting of restoration partnerships as described in Sections 6.1 and 63. Upon forming these partnerships, the COSV and its restoration partners would work together on securing restoration funding, as per Section 6.2. The COSV realizes the importance of implementing this plan and will strive to attain the timelines and benchmarks described herein as funding allows. Per WAC 173-26-201(2)(�, the process to prepare a restoration plan may vary significantly among local jurisdictions depending on a variety of factors including size of the jurisdiction; extent and condition of shorelines; the availability of grants, volunteer programs, or other tools for restoration; and the nature of the ecological functions to be addressed. The COSV is unique in that most of the near-shore riparian habitat along the Spokane River within the ciry limits is managed as natural area by the Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission (State Parks). Due to this designation, the shoreline condition is in a relatively natural and stable state compared with other urban environments. However, recreational use is projected to increase and future developments are anticipated within the shoreline jurisdiction. To balance this increased land use pressure, which has the potential to negatively affect shoreline ecological functions, implementing the restoration actions described in this plan will help the COSV meet the goal of "no net loss of shoreline ecological functions." A limitation to Spokane River aquatic habitat qualiry is the presence of dams above and below the city. The dams limit summer flows and also create slack water at the west end of the city. Operation of the dams is a factor that is mostly beyond the control of the COSV. The restoration element of the COSV's SMP update is focused on the identification of restoration opportunities, ranking of those opportunities, and identifying partnerships, planning elements, and grant options to implement these opportunities. It should be noted that coordination between the COSV and State Parks will be required to further many of the restoration opportunities identified in this plan. City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan, Dec. 11,2012 1-2 SECTIONONE INTRODUCTION 1.3 REQUIRED ELEMENTS OF RESTORATION PLANNING FOR SMP UPDATES The state guidelines (WAC 173-26-201(2)(�) provide six necessary elements for a complete shoreline restoration plan. These elements are summarized in Table 1 with reference to the section of this report in which that element is addressed. Table 1. Required Elements of Restoration Planning for SMP Updates Shoreline Restoration Plan Elements for SMP Updates Section in this Report Identify degraded areas,impaired ecological functions, and sites with potential Section 3: Existing and Ongoing far ecological restoration. Projects and Programs -and- Section 5: Restoration Opportunities Establish overall goals and priorities far restaration of degraded areas and Section 2: Restoration Goals and impaired ecological functions. Supporting Policies -and- Section 4: Priaritization Methodology Identify existing and ongoing projects and programs currently being Section 3: Existing and Ongoing implemented that are designed to contribute to local restoration goals(such as Projects and Programs capital improvement programs [CIPs] and watershed planning efforts). Identify additional projects and programs needed to achieve local restaration Section 3: Existing and Ongoing goals and implementation strategies,including identifying prospective funding Projects and Programs sources far those projects and programs. -and- Section 6: Implementation Plan Identify timelines and benchmarks for implementing restoration projects and Section 6: Implementation Plan programs, and achieving local restoration goals. Provide for mechanisms or strategies to ensure that restoration projects and Section 7: Monitoring and programs will be implemented according to plans and to appropriately review Maintenance the effectiveness of the projects and programs in meeting the overall restoration goals(e.g.,monitoring of restoration project sites). City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan, Dec. 11,2012 1-3 SECTIONTWO RESTORATION GOALSAND SUPPORTING POLICIES The goals and policies of this plan direct the course of the COSV's shoreline restoration efforts. This plan's goals and policies are an expansion of the proposed SMP Restoration Element goals and policies and are tailored to address the findings and recommendations of relevant plans and assessments reviewed for this plan. Goal SMP 6: Conservation : Preserve for the future those natural resources,including the unique,fragile and scenic qualities of the shoreline,which cannot be replaced. Achieve no net loss of ecological functions of the shoreline. Goal SMP 7: Restoration: Restore habitat and the natural systems to improve shoreline ecological functions. Restoration Plan Policy 1: Summarize degraded shoreline areas and functions documented by previous assessments. This plan documents areas identified as restoration opportunities by the City of Spokane T�alley Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report (URS 2010). For each restoration opporiunity identified by the Inventory and Characterization Report, the plan documents the apparent impairment (cause of degradation to shoreline ecological functions) and a conceptual restoration approach. Restoration Plan Policy 2: Prioritize restoration opportunities to identify projects with greatest benefit to shoreline areas. In order to most effectively proceed with restoration efforts, this plan prioritizes restoration opportunities in terms of overall benefit to the waterway. Restoration priorities are based on an assessment of limiting factors (as summarized in Section 3.1, below) in combination with the ease of project implementation (e.g., on public land), and project size. Prioritization methods are described in Section 4. Restoration Plan Policy 3: Establish an implementation strategy. As directed by WAC 173-26-201(2)(�(iii-iv), an adequate restoration plan must identify potential restoration partners, potential funding mechanisms, timelines, and benchmarks. Together, these elements comprise an implementation strategy. This plan includes these elements and organizes them to facilitate a workable implementation strategy. Restoration Plan Policy 4: Identify existing and prospective projects and programs that are contributing or likely to contribute towards local shoreline restoration efforts. An assortment of existing project and programs are in effect to support shoreline restoration efforts. Some are located within the COSV while others are regional. This plan includes an assessment of the existing project and programs to determine where gaps exist with regard to achieving the goal of this plan. This plan then describes additional projects and/or programs that have the potential to fill in those gaps. Restoration Plan Policy 5: Work with public and private partners to encourage restoration and enhancement of Spokane T�alley's shoreline areas City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan, Dec. 11,2012 2-1 SECTIONTWO RESTORATION GOALSAND SUPPORTING POLICIES The COSV will work to establish parmerships with public and private groups on specific restoration projects and/or programs, as funding allows. Special emphasis will be placed on creating partnerships with State Parks as they own a majority of the land within the COSV's shoreline jurisdiction. Restoration Plan Policy 6: Monitor success of restoration activities and adapt strategies based on monitoring results. This plan establishes a monitoring protocol to evaluate the effectiveness of the COSV's efforts to implement the restoration plan and meet the overall restoration goaL Monitoring data may be used to identify successful project designs that serve as examples for future restoration projects. In addition, where monitoring data documents failed designs, the data will be used to modify the strategy for subsequent restoration design projects. City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan, Dec. 11,2012 2-2 SECTIONTHREE Existing and Ongoing Prolects and Programs This section summarizes existing factors limiting the functionality of the shoreline ecosystem within the COSV. It then identifies existing ongoing projects and programs that are contributing or likely to contribute towards local shoreline restoration efforts. Lastly, this section identifies additional projects and programs that, in combination with existing projects and programs, would meet the goals of this plan and address the limiting factors. 3.1 SUMMARY OF LIMITING FACTORS Based on shoreline observations and existing natural resource assessments and watershed plans reviewed while preparing the City of Spokane i�alley Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report (URS 2010), the following table provides a summary of limiting factors for the Spokane River and Shelley Lake shoreline ecosystems. Limiting factors are environmental variables whose presence, absence, or abundance restricts the distribution, numbers, or condition of one or more organisms (Webster 2007). These factors impair ecosystem processes and limit the capaciry of ecological functions. Restoration activities should be developed to address the cause of these limiting factors, where possible. Table 2. Summary of Factors Limiting the Proper Functioning Condition of the COSV's SMA-Regulated Waters LIMTTING FACTOR ASSUMED CAUSE(S) AFFECTED WATER Dissolved metals(toxics) Past industrial practices Spokane River High summer water temperature Lack of riparian cover,low/restricted Spokane River, Shelley Lake flows Lack of riparian cover Adjacent land management Spokane River (transportation/utility corridor right- of-way [ROW] maintenance), pedestrian degradation,non-native species establishment,urban land use (turf,concrete, etc.) Lack of lake fringe vegetation Dramatic drawdown zone on steep Shelley Lake lacustrine banks inhibits natural recruitment of permanent lakeside vegetation. Presence/spread of noxious vegetation Prior introductions,funding Spokane River that displaces higher functioning insufficient to treat cause ar contain native habitat existing populations,continued transport along Centennial Trail. Low dissolved oxygen Eutrophication due to high nutrient Spokane River, Shelley Lake inputs from non-point sources in WA and ID,low flow in slack water portions of river. Lack of fish passage Multiple hydroelectric dams and Spokane River Spokane Falls. Low summer flows Dams hold back water in Lake Coeur Spokane River, Shelley Lake d'Alene and Saltese Creek,which results in low summer flows to the river and lake,respectively City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan, Dec. 11,2012 3-1 SECTIONTHREE Existing and Ongoing Prolects and Programs 3.2 EXISTING AND ONGOING PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS 3.2.1 Spokane Subbasin Plan The Spokane Subbasin Plan (SSP), contained within the larger Intermountain Subbasin Plan, was prepared by GEI Consultants Inc. for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council (NPCC) in 2004 (GEI Consultants Inc. 2004). The NPCC is responsible for developing a fish and wildlife program to protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife affected by hydroelectric development in the Columbia River Basin, and make annual funding recommendations to the Bonneville Power Administration for projects to implement the program. The SSP assessed existing conditions within the subbasin and was developed in an open public process, incorporating feedback from a wide range of state, federal, tribal and local managers, experts, landowners, local governments, and stakeholders. The primary purpose of the plan is to guide the design and funding of projects that protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife that have been adversely impacted by the development and operation of the Columbia River hydropower system. The construction and maintenance of dams, habitat degradation caused by agriculture and timber harvest, pollutants from point and non-point sources, sedimentation, declining stream flows, urbanization, fish barriers, and nonnative fish have all contributed to the decline of native species in the Intermountain Subbasin. The SSP contains a management plan that outlines goals and objectives which prioritize implementation strategies to address the degraded fish habitat specifically within the Spokane Subbasin. The SSP evaluates the health of the major water bodies included within the Spokane Subbasin, including the Spokane River. The SSP provides province level objectives as well as specific objectives and strategies for effectively managing priority fish species within the Spokane Subbasin. Objectives and strategies within the SSP include the following: • Complete assessments of resident fish losses throughout the Spokane Subbasin resulting from dam construction and operation by year 2020. • Develop and implement projects directed at protecting, restoring, and enhancing fish habitat for both native and nonnative resident fish through improvements in riparian conditions, fish passage, and aquatic conditions. • Develop and meet recovery plan goals for sensitive native resident fish species. • Conduct baseline investigations to determine native resident and resident fish stock composition, distribution, and relative abundance in the Subbasin. • Protect, restore, and enhance existing terrestrial and aquatic resources in order to meet the increased demands (cultural, subsistence, and recreational) on these resources associated with the extirpation of anadromous fisheries. • Where possible, acquire priority properties that can be protected or restored to support native ecosystem/watershed function through title acquisition, conservation easements, and/or long-term leases. • Create or use existing incentive programs for private landowners to protect and/or restore habitats to support native ecosystem/watershed function. . Enhance populations of sensitive native resident fish through habitat improvements and artificial production in concert with recovery plans. City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan, Dec. 11,2012 3-2 SECTIONTHREE Existing and Ongoing Prolects and Programs 3.2.2 Spokane River Water Quality Managed Implementation Plan for Water Resource Inventory Area (VIIRIA) 57 Watershed planning is being conducted in the Middle Spokane River Basin (WRIA 57) through grants from Ecology. WRIA 57 comprises the portions of the drainage basin of the Spokane River upstream of the confluence with Latah Creek to Washington State's eastern boundary, including all portions of the river within the COSV. Spokane County is the lead agency of a planning unit that was formed in 1999 and includes broad representation of local agencies and various interest groups in the basin. The Planning Unit holds monthly meetings that are open to the public. The WRIA 55 & 57 Watershed Management Plan was adopted by the Pend Oreille, Spokane, and Stevens County Commissioners on January 31, 2006. The WRIA 55 & 57 Watershed Detailed Implementation Plan (DIl') was approved by the Watershed Implementation Team on February 20, 2008. The DIP is a blueprint for coordinating and implementing 107 recommendations outlined in the Watershed Management Plan for the Little and Middle Spokane River Basins. The watershed planning effort has identified a variety of water management challenges. The recommendations fall into the following categories: • Instream flow needs . Water conservation, reclamation, and reuse • Domestic exempt wells . Water rights and claims • Strategies for base flow augmentation • Strategies for ground water recharge augmentation • Approaches to plan implementation The watershed plan and associated DIP have resulted in the various key projects being implemented within the watershed. Some future projects may occur within the COSV. Coordination and participation in the watershed planning unit can help implement shoreline restoration projects within the COSV that can help support the SOSV's shoreline restoration goal. 3.2.3 Spokane River TMDL Management Plan The total maximum daily load (TMDL) water quality improvement report was prepared by Ecology in 2007 and revised in 2010 (Ecology 2010b). The report establishes a management plan to address the problem of low dissolved oxygen occurring in the river due to eutrophication in the Spokane River and Lake Spokane. Eutrophication is a process where excess aquatic plant growth and algal blooms occur in water due to high levels of nutrients such as phosphorus. The excessive plant growth consumes large amounts of dissolved oxygen in the water, reducing it to levels that are harmful for fish and other aquatic species. The report includes a Managed Implementation Plan. The goals of the Managed Implementation Plan are to reduce significant amounts of phosphorus in the Spokane River during the April through October season and achieve water qualiry standards for dissolved oxygen. The plan City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan, Dec. 11,2012 3-3 SECTIONTHREE Existing and Ongoing Prolects and Programs establishes limits for ammonia, total phosphorus, and carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand. The plan focuses on strategies to reduce phosphorus because the strategies will likely result in reductions of these and other important pollutants. The plan sets limits on point sources, including the Kaiser industrial facility in the COSV. In addition, the plan must also assign pollutant loads to non-point sources in the watershed. Non- point sources are addressed by a Regional Non-Point Source Reduction Program and a Septic Tank Elimination Program. 3.2.4 Spokane River Hazardous Metals Cleanup Efforts As part of the Eastern Washington Clean Sites Initiative, Ecology is engaged in an effort that involves communities and other partners in shaping cleanup projects, including sites within the COSV. Through the initiative, Ecology is attempting to reduce toxic threats to people and the environment associated with historical mining practices in the Coeur d'Alene Basin. These historical mining practices resulted in contaminants known as heavy metals washing downstream from Idaho. The metals include lead, arsenic, zinc, and cadmium, and they have settled in soil and river sediments at certain shoreline areas along the Spokane River. Within the COSV, cleanup efforts are planned at four sites. In 2012, cleanup efforts will commence at the Barker Road North beach, which lies on the north side of the Spokane River east of the Barker Road Bridge. The other three beaches proposed for cleanup within the COSV are Islands Lagoon, Myrtle Point and Flora Road, which are all on the south side of the Spokane River. Initial cleanup work was done at the Flora Road beach in 2009. However, heavy spring runoff in 2011 damaged portions of the protective soil cap. The new cap will be designed to minimize future erosion. Ecology and local river groups intend to plant native vegetation on the soil caps to help stabilize the banks, thus reducing future erosion concerns at cleanup sites. COSV coordination in these projects may help ensure that revegetation efforts are successful. 3.2.5 Riverside State ParklCentennial Trail Management Activities Through State Parks' Classification and Management Planning Project, the Riverside State Park Management Plan was created in 2005 to establish a management plan for the park that is consistent with the agency's goal to identify appropriate recreational experiences that meet the needs of the public while protecting natural, cultural, and recreational resources for future generations (State Parks 2005). The park includes several subareas. The Centennial Trail subarea is the park area found along the Spokane River in a narrow band along much of both shorelines through the COSV. According to the plan, there are two relevant natural resource management issues for the Centennial Trail subarea. These include noxious weed control and protection of wildlife habitat/natural ecosystems. As part of the park-wide vegetation management program, the plan directs park staff to coordinate with their Regional Stewardship Manager to solicit cooperation from local governments to enhance noxious weed control efforts along segments of the Centennial Trail for which they have management responsibility. To achieve this, park staff is expected to actively solicit volunteer participation in manual removal of noxious weeds along the Centennial Trail. City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan, Dec. 11,2012 3-4 SECTIONTHREE Existing and Ongoing Prolects and Programs The plan directs wildlife habitat and natural ecosystem protection efforts to focus on riparian planting projects. Specifically, the plans' maintenance program includes planting of appropriate native vegetation along the shoulders of the Centennial Trail to reduce noxious weed invasion and enhance slope stability. 3.2.6 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) Habitat Mitigation Fund The WDFW issues Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) permits to projects proposing construction within flowing waters. In order to issue an HPA, the WDFW must ensure that project-related impacts to fish habitat are mitigated. Using money collected through past permit violations as well as payments made in lieu of onsite compensatory mitigation from various bridge projects along the Spokane River, the WDFW created a habitat mitigation fund. The purpose of this fund is to provide dollars for fish enhancement projects within the river that offset past habitat impacts associated with the permitted projects and violations. Typically, the fund is passed on to local conservation organizations that implement specific shoreline restoration projects. Use of the fund is discontinuing as the agency is moving away from the current process, which often makes the link between project impacts and future restoration projects difficult to follow. Future bridge projects, like the Sullivan Road Bridge repair project proposed by the COSV, will likely need to prepare project-specific mitigation plans in order to obtain an HPA. However, remaining money in the fund may be available for shoreline restoration projects within the COSV. To be eligible, the restoration project must benefit fish habitat. As riparian restoration projects and shoreline stabilization/erosion control project benefit fish habitat, it is possible that these projects would be eligible for use of any remaining funds. 3.2.7 Local Volunteer Groups The COSV is fortunate to receive help from a variery of volunteer groups that engage in habitat restoration, often in shoreline areas. These groups include the Spokane River Forum, Friends of the Falls, the Spokane Canoe and Kayak Club, the Northwest Whitewater Association, Trout Unlimited, and the Veterans Conservation Corps among others. Recent shoreline restoration projects implemented by such groups include riparian plantings and the restoration of Mirabeau Park This project involved debris and weed removal, a drain system to remedy shoreline erosion from stormwater runoff, and hydro-seeding with native plants to stabilize the affected shoreline area and provide native plant community support. Other recent volunteer efforts in the COSV include the 2012 Spokane River Clean-Up. This year's event is planned to cover the University District, Sullivan Park, Barker Road, and Harvard Road in Spokane Valley. Each year, the amount of litter removed from the Spokane River's shorelines grows as more volunteers show up and cover more area. A growing list of groups and organizations participate each year, including high schools, churches, whitewater groups, service clubs, and others. City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan, Dec. 11,2012 3-5 SECTIONTHREE Existing and Ongoing Prolects and Programs In addition, the Lands Council planted a mix of about 50 native shrubs at the Barker Road trailhead during the Spokane River Cleanup in 2011 and about 1,200 ponderosa pines along the Spokane River near Sullivan Park during Reforest Spokane Day in 2011. The Lands Council plans to continue these efforts in Spokane Valley during future Reforest Spokane Days and has identified high schools that may be interested in assisting with volunteer efforts. Shoreline restoration opportunities described in this plan would be of assistance to the council as they plan for future shoreline planting projects. 3.3 ADDITIONAL PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS NEEDED TO ACHIEVE SHORELINE RESTORATION GOALS The following proposed additional projects and programs may augment the existing, ongoing projects and programs in a manner that addresses the limiting factors and, thereby, meets the shoreline restoration goal (Section 2.1): • Support volunteer groups engaged in shoreline restoration activities • Coordinate with WDFW to direct wildlife mitigation funds towards shoreline enhancement projects within COSV and/or develop habitat enhancement strategies to offset impacts associated with proposed bridge projects • Work with the Ecology to incorporate revegetation into future hazardous materials cleanup activities located along the river • Work with project managers within COSV government to incorporate shoreline restoration into proposed capital improvement projects located near Shoreline of the State • Generate funding through fees to support staff availability for shoreline restoration coordination The existing level of local interest in shoreline habitat enhancements is promising but, as a volunteer and grant funding-dependent venture, it cannot be relied upon alone to realize the goal of no net loss of ecological functions within the SMP planning area. However, grant-funded volunteer efforts have contributed greatly towards shoreline restoration efforts, as noted above, and the COSV should periodically check in with these volunteer organizations to see how the COSV can assist with planning for future shoreline restoration efforts. Regional WDFW mitigation funds have been and will continue to be provided to either the Spokane Conservation District (SCD) or Trout Unlimited to be used for implementing habitat enhancements. To tap into these, the COSV will need to coordinate with the SCD, Trout Unlimited, and the WDFW to create agreements for the design, permitting (as necessary), implementation, and maintenance of shoreline enhancement projects. Therefore, the COSV planning staff should begin to regularly coordinate with these groups to steer funds towards identified restoration priorities. Ecology's river cleanup plans currently lack robust vegetation enhancement components. Cleanup sites noted near Sullivan appear to involve a gravel cap with no vegetation. These Ecology cleanup efforts should be encouraged to incorporate a vegetative restoration component, preferably with input from State Parks and the COSV, to ensure that the projects are consistent with the Shoreline Restoration Goals of the SMP. Capital improvement projects slated within the shoreline areas have the potential to be planned and funded so as to include an element of shoreline restoration. This includes the Sullivan Road City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan, Dec. 11,2012 3-6 SECTIONTHREE Existing and Ongoing Prolects and Programs Bridge repair project and enhanced formal river access developments described in the access management plan element of the COSV SMP update. When discussing justification for the spending of tax dollars on shoreline restoration elements of future capital improvement projects, this plan may be referenced as it describes the role of shoreline restoration under the SMP. Lastly, the COSV may modify shoreline development permit fees so that they generate sufficient income to cover the cost of staff involvement in shoreline restoration coordination. City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan, Dec. 11,2012 3-7 SECTIONFOUR Prioritization Methodology The prioritization methodology described in this plan was created specifically for the shoreline conditions along the Spokane River and Shelley Lake. Prioritization of restoration areas was based on five factors that are simple to measure and greatly influence the value of shoreline enhancements. Geographical Information Systems (GIS) technology was utilized to measure and score each site. Each site is scored on a scale of 1 to 5 for each of the five factors. The sum of the scores for these five factors provided an overall priority score for each site. This score illuminates restoration opportunities that are both practical to develop and result in the greatest benefit to shoreline functions. Table 3. Restoration Priorit Scorin Criteria Factor Measurement Scoring Criteria Ease of property Public ownership Public(5)ar private(1) acquisition Shade benefit Aspect along stream South bank(5),west bank(3), east bank(2),or north (thermoregulation) corridar(far planting of bank(1). Sites with more than one aspect receive the woody vegetation) highest aspect score. Sites that would not produce shade are scored as 0. Scale of restoration Size(acreage) Area>2 acres(5),> 1 but<2 acres(3),>0.5 but <1 activity acre (2),and area smaller than 0.5 acres(1) Role within context of Habitat connectivity Creates or fills gaps in wildlife habitat corridor surrounding habitat matrix (continuous woody vegetation cover)to produce a corridor that is greater than 10001inear feet(5), 500 to 9991inear feet(3), 100 to 4991inear feet(2),or under 1001inear feet(1). Restoration opportunities that would not create shade within 100 feet of the shoreline are not applicable and receive a scare of 0. Consistency with other Supports at least one other This plan addresses SMP Goal#7 (Restore habitat and SMP goals SMP goal the natural systems to improve shoreline ecological functions). Far shoreline restoration actions that have the additional merit of supporting other SMP goals, such as flood hazard reduction(Goal#9)or safe public access (Goal#10),those actions will receive a score of 5 far this factar. Natural Heritage Data and Prioriry Habitat & Species data were also factored in the prioritization analysis but these data did not affect any one site more than the others based on a lack of known populations within the COSV's shoreline areas. The priority scores are ranked from highest to lowest in Table 4 of this report. City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan, Dec. 11,2012 4-1 SECTIONFIVE Restoration Opportunities Restoration opportunities are discussed below as either a programmatic opportunity or as a site- specific opportunity. Site-specific opportunities draw directly from physical shoreline assessments that identified sites where degraded conditions could be restored to a properly functioning condition. These are opportunities for shoreline restoration for the COSV's consideration as the plan is implemented. As restoration opportunities identified in this plan are voluntary and subject to available funding, the COSV is not obligated to implement these opportunities directly. However, the COSV should reference these projects when reviewing shoreline development proposals or discussing shoreline projects with public agencies or interested volunteer groups. Where possible, the COSV should attempt to incorporate shoreline restoration into prospective projects, and track such progress, to document compliance with the shoreline restoration element of the SMP. 5.1 PROGRAMMATIC RESTORATION OPPORTUNITIES Programmatic opportunities are those that can be incorporated into existing or proposed programs with the goal of restoring ecological functions to the waterways without focusing on specific sites. Programmatic opportunities include approaches like public education or regulatory policy changes. These changes do not address specific sites, but rather, modify the way in which the public generally uses and views the shoreline areas in Spokane. OPPORTUNITY STRATEGY 1. Public Education Examples include incorporation of stream restoration practices (planting) and stewardship opportunities (minimal water use, litter removal) into environmental education curriculum at Spokane Valley Public Schools and colleges. Also, schools can be assigned to specific shoreline reaches to foster a conservation relationship between students and their local environment. 2. Shoreline Regulations The COSV manages development by regulating use, setbacks, height, and Enforcement design, and other standards to reduce impacts to ecological functions. 3. Shoreline Maintenance The following are examples of ways in which the COSV can restore shoreline areas through COSV maintenance programs: a. Identify potential funding sources to support the development and implementation of shoreline maintenance and enhancement strategies and low impact development strategies for COSV parks located in shoreline areas. This would apply to the following parks managed or maintained by the Spokane Valley Parks and Recreation Department (within SMA jurisdiction): Sullivan Park, Mirabeau Park, the Myrtle Point Natural Area, and any portions of the Centennial Trail maintained by the COSV. b. Develop roadside maintenance and enhancement strategies with the City of Spokane Valley Public Works Department for road ROW areas within SMA jurisdiction. Maintenance strategies can include slope stabilization (seeding/planting of bare soil areas), noxious weed control, and protection of native vegetation. City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan, Dec. 11,2012 5-1 SECTIONFIVE Restoration Opportunities Representative streets include North Barker Road, North Flora Road, North Sullivan Road, South Mirabeau Parkway, and East Coyote Rock Drive. 4. Conservation Futures The COSV may utilize conservation futures funding to purchase private properties with high restoration potential or developments within a flood zone to enhance shoreline areas. 5. Stormwater Plan/ The COSV's stormwater master planning may identify ways to Development Standards reduce non-treated runoff from entering aquatic habitats. Additionally, development standards may be reviewed to determine whether updated standards would provide opportunities for reducing pollution associated with stormwater. 5.2. SITE-SPECIFIC RESTORATION OPPORTUNITIES Table 4 summarizes the site-specific restoration opportunities that were identified during detailed stream assessments that occurred in 2010 as summarized in the City of Spokane T�alley Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report (URS 2010). For each opportunity, the cause of degradation (impairment), functions affected, conceptual restoration strategy, and restoration priority are provided. Photographs representative of the general impairments encountered at the restoration opportunity sites are contained in Appendix B. Opportunities are arranged by their prioriry score. Spokane River restoration opportunities can be seen on Figures 3a, 3b, and 3c. Shelley Lake restoration opportunities can also be seen in an inset on Figure 3c. Sites are generally numbered progressively along the waterway, beginning at the downstream extent and continuing progressively up river to the east. It should be noted that opportunities for enhancing the drawdown zone (shorelines between seasonal high and low water levels) around Shelley Lake were investigated. Little research exists on successful revegetation practices for drawdown environments. A review of historical photography indicates that vegetation did not naturally establish along the north, west, and south sides of the lake. Therefore, efforts to establish vegetation there would be better described as enhancement rather than restoration. Recent past efforts to establish vegetation were unsuccessful according to local residents. Vegetation establishment along the lake's northern, western, and southern drawdown zones would likely require either stabilizing lake water levels, benching/terracing the shoreline, or irrigation. Due to the proximity of the lake's shorelines to adjacent, developed residential properties and the frequency of human visitors on and around the lake, enhancement of the lake's steep shorelines would seem to be a low priority within the greater COSV. This is especially true with regard to ensuring no-net-loss of shoreline ecological functions when considering the degree of difficulty associated with water level management and/or shoreline grading around Shelley Lake. As such, the shoreline restoration opportunities identified around Shelley Lake (see Table 4) focus on the restoration of habitat along the east end of the lake and a wetland area just southeast of the lake where shorelines are more likely to support successful plantings. City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan, Dec. 11,2012 5-2 SECTIONFIVE RESTORATION OPPORTUNITIES Table 4. Shoreline Restoration Opportunities Site Priority j� Waterway Impairment Conceptual Restoration Approach Acres Public No Photoi Score Area of bank erosion due to high A combination of slope bioengineering 22 30 Spokane winter flow energy directed against combined with potential upstream fluvial River bank.Heavily rip-rapped modifications to decrease flow energy 0.65 YES 3-C 1 Managed access and noxious weed 20 31 Degraded habitat with large controL If off-road driving is curtailed, Spokane concentration of noxious weeds and several pine saplings will develop into River off-road vehicle traffic productive riparian foresthabitat 2.88 YES 3-C 18 11 Spokane Fence along access road creates Create wildlife undercrossing beneath River impasse for wildlife fenced roadway 0.03 YES 3-B 18 Zq Spokane Remnant patches of native prairie Weed control and seeding with native 3-B,3- River habitat competing with weeds prairie species 3.63 YES C Spokane Break in corridar full of spotted 17 13 River knapweed Riparian plantings 0.75 YES 3-B Spokane Degraded habitat;clearing 17 23 River associated with old road. Riparian forest plantings 0.44 YES 3-B Managed access and noxious weed 17 33 Degraded habitat with large controL If off-road driving is curtailed, Spokane concentration of noxious weeds and several pine saplings will develop into River off-road vehicle traffic productive riparian forest habitat 0.60 YES 3-C 2 Signage indicating riparian rehabilitation 16 6 Spokane Break in high quality riparian shrub to allow for passive restoration.Many River corridor saplings here 0.30 YES 3-A Fonnal trail establishment between 16 10 Spokane Habitat degradation due to parking areas and rock outcropping along River unmanaged pedestrian traffic shoreline. Signage,plantings,and 8.47 YES 3-B City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan,Dec.11,2012 5-3 SECTIONFIVE RESTORATION OPPORTUNITIES s�ce Priority j� R'aterway Impairment Conceptual Restoration Approach Acres Public No Photoi Score between parking areas and shoreline. strategic fencing to limit dispersed travel 16 18 Spokane Remnant patches of native prairie Riparian forest plantings along banks and River habitat competing with weeds prairie restoration on terrace above 2.57 YES 3-B 16 2� Spokane Disturbed/cleared area with large River spotted knapweed infestation Riparian forest plantings 0.11 YES 3-B 16 Z 1 Spokane Disturbed/cleared area with large River spotted knapweed infestation Riparian forest plantings 0.13 YES 3-B 3 16 Zg Spokane Ecology clean up area resulting in Riparian plantings and habitat features River bare gravel fill (woody debris) 0.28 YES 3-C 4 16 36 Spokane Slope bioengineering and riparian River Erosive gully plantings 0.09 YES 3-C 5 Formal access combined with native 16 38 Recently burnt area with heavy foot plantings and weed control to deter Spokane traffic associated with recreation transition to post-fire cheat-grass River access community 2.07 YES 3-C 6 Remnants of native Rathdrum Prairie 15 5 Spokane habitat competing with noxious River weeds Weed control 3.94 YES 3-A 15 � Spokane Degraded riparian slope area with River heavy foot traffic Riparian plantings 1.36 YES 3-A 7 Plant height appropriate shrubs along 15 16 Spokane Eroding area beneath transinission slope beneath powerline to create cover River line,break in riparian con�idar far wildlife and slope stabilization 1.77 YES 3-B Spokane 15 26 Eroding,steep streambank beneath River �ail. Support for trail and bench Slope bioengineering 0.61 YES 3-C City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan,Dec.11,2012 5-4 SECTIONFIVE RESTORATION OPPORTUNITIES s�ce Priority j� R'aterway Impairment Conceptual Restoration Approach Acres Public No Photoi Score feature are failing Wetland functions including water filtration,temperature regulation,and 15 40 habitat complexity would be enhanced by Shelley Wetland along tributary to lake lacks planting native shrubs in upper fringe of Lake cover/shade wetland and trees along wetland buffer 2.25 NO 3-C 8 14 12 Spokane Sparse riparian vegetation lacks River cover/shade Riparian plantings/underplantings 1.41 YES 3-B Opportunity for native plant 14 32 Spokane Area historically cultivated for apple establishment and/or upland native prairie River trees seeding 1.48 YES 3-C 13 19 Spokane Remnant patches of native prairie Controlled burn combined with native River habitat competing with weeds seeding and knapweed control 0.65 YES 3-B 12 4 Spokane Area full of construction debris and Debris removal,managed access,and River disturbed by random trails riparian plantings 0.55 NO 3-A 12 8 Spokane Sparse riparian vegetation lacks Riparian shrub plantings and native River cover/shade prairie enhancement 4.59 NO 3-B 12 17 Spokane Slope erosion due to heavy foot Controlled access/stairs would allow for River traffic passive restoration 0.28 YES 3-B 9 Spokane 11 3 River Erosion/break in corridar Slope stabilization/plantings 0.14 NO 3-A 11 9 Spokane River Degraded riparian habitat Shoreline stabilizationhiparian plantings 0.30 YES 3-B 11 14 Spokane Erosion associated with heavy foot Bioengineered slope stabilization and River traftic managed/fonnal access 0.04 YES 3-B 10 City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan,Dec.11,2012 5-5 SECTIONFIVE RESTORATION OPPORTUNITIES s�ce Priority j� R'aterway Impairment Conceptual Restoration Approach Acres Public No Photoi Score 11 15 Spokane Reinnant patches of native prairie Weed conh�ol and seeding with native River habitat competing with weeds prairie species 0.50 NO 3-B 11 ZZ Spokane Disturbed/cleared area with large River spotted knapweed infestation Riparian forest plantings 0.12 YES 3-B Provide a return flow culvert to drain 11 34 Spokane flood waters that otherwise erode trail River Flood erosion undercutting trail and adjacent habitat areas 0.02 YES 3-C 11 37 Spokane Degraded shoreline habitat with high River spotted knapweed concentration Riparian plantings 1.87 NO 3-C 11 9 1 Spokane Habitat degraded by old road River resulting in break in riparian corridor Riparian plantings 0.33 NO 3-A 9 35 Spokane Degraded shoreline habitat with high River spotted knapweed concentration Riparian plantings 0.25 YES 3-C 12 Shelley Reed canarygrass removal;native plant 8 39 Lake Noxious weeds establishment 0.27 NO 3-C � Z Spokane River Eroded gully Slope stabilizarion/plantings 0.01 NO 3-A � 28 Spokane Break in vegetation corridor on steep River slope Riparian forestplantings 0.10 NO 3-C 13 Degraded grassland habitat 6 25 Spokane dominated by non-native vegetation, River break in riparian farest corridor Riparian plantings 0.49 NO 3-C Spokane Remnant patches of native prairie Selective weed control and passive 3 27 River habitat competing with weeds restoration 0.67 NO 3-C 1Photo Nuuibers Refer to Appeudix A. City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan,Dec.11,2012 5-6 SECTIONFIVE RESTORATION OPPORTUNITIES 5.3 CONCEPTUAL RESTORATION APPROACHES Restoration opportunities listed in Table 4 of this plan include conceptual restoration approaches. These approaches address the specific impairments at each restoration opportuniry site. Where possible, they attempt to address the cause of the impairment to achieve long-term gains in shoreline ecological functions. The majority of the recommended restoration approaches have to do with riparian forest or scrub-shrub plantings. This is because these types of restoration projects tend to provide multiple ecological benefits that enhance various shoreline functions. According to research conducted while preparing the City of Spokane T�alley Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report (URS 2010), riparian plantings tend to provide the greatest return on investment along the Spokane River, considering the options available to the COSV. Plantings within areas of active river flow tend to require greater planning; these areas often require additional restoration factors to ensure that plantings are not washed out with the first high water of the season. Riparian planting projects located above the area of seasonally high water are generally much simpler to establish. This section provides generalized restoration information associated with the conceptual approaches noted in Table 4 to aid in developing site specific restoration plans. 5.3.1 Riparian Plantings Native riparian plantings almost always enhance quality of riparian habitats. The qualiry of riparian habitat promotes several beneficial functions to both the terrestrial and aquatic habitat components. These include pollutant filtering, wildlife habitat (cover, food, roosting), habitat connectivity, shading/temperature control of water, and input of organic matter (e.g., leaf litter) that provides food web support to aquatic species, including support for benthic invertebrates (Covitch et. al. 1999). Benthic invertebrates, or insects that live in the river soils, are a primary food source for native fish but heavy concentrations of inetals in the river substrate have negatively affected the invertebrates, thus affecting the overall food web (Ecology 2005). Planning for riparian planting projects must address the physical and ecological site conditions such as soil stabiliry, moisture a�ailabiliry, and aspect (amount of sun). Successful riparian plantings require appropriate species selection for a given set of local site conditions. Some species are found more commonly on the north, dry banks of the Spokane River, while others prefer the less-exposed southern banks. Certain species grow near the river edge while others prefer the elevations slightly above the water but where roots can reach the seasonally low water table. For these reasons, a qualified ecologist with riparian planting experience should assist with developing planting plans for specific areas whenever possible. Appendix C of the City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report (URS 2010) includes a list of vegetation inventoried along the shoreline. Native species contained in this list provide a good starting point for the development of a restoration project plant list. 5.3.2 Streambank Stabilization Streambanks often become unstable as a result of natural forces, such as increased water velocity. Where vegetation is present, the water scour energy is dissipated by the vegetation and City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan, Dec. 11,2012 $-7 SECTIONFIVE RESTORATION OPPORTUNITIES the soils are bound by the roots, thus resulting in less erosion. However, where vegetation is absent or degraded, often in association with pedestrian foot traffic or historical clearing, soils become less stable and prone to erosion. Erosion, although a natural process, can be detrimental to aquatic organisms when the amount of loose sediments in the river (turbidity) exceeds low densities. In addition to protecting human infrastructure, such as the Centennial Trail, streambank stabilization reduces the potential for shoreline erosion. Depending on site-specific conditions, one or more actions may be appropriate to stabilize an eroding shoreline area. Riparian plantings contribute greatly to bank stabilization by binding soil in roots and acting as a buffer to water velociry and abrasive materials transported in water. Based on existing streambank conditions, stabilization may also require engineering techniques such as slope set-back, terracing, soil wraps, or placement of large woody debris (LWD), to promote long-term stability. The term "bioengineering" used in Table 4 refers to the use of both engineering materials and biological materials that can grow within an engineered structure to provide structural support as well as habitat and shade functions. Examples include large rock or soil wrapped in geotextile fabric and secured with willow stakes. Streambank bioengineering in low precipitation areas often include live-stake plantings, brush or tree revetments, erosion control straw blankets, and willow fascines (Hoag and Fripp 2002). In certain situations, more durabiliry is needed to secure banks against high water velociry, to protect property and stabilize eroding riparian habitat. Hard devices such as rip-rap should be specifically sized and configured to the situation by a qualified person or team. Where possible, they should incorporate plantings. Geotechnical and hydraulic considerations are important to assess on a site-specific basis. 5.3.3 Noxious Weed Control Noxious weed control is an essential component of riparian vegetation maintenance and restoration. Native vegetation,in many areas throughout Spokane Valley,has the potential to re-establish through passive means (i.e.,by itsel�but competition from non-native and noxious vegetation in many areas is sufficient to prevent its successful growth. The installation of native vegetation in areas where weeds are prevalent requires careful site preparation and noxious weed maintenance. Given realistic constraints on long-term site maintenance, the best opportuniry to control weeds is to select plants to install that can compete against the weed(s), and in the best case scenario outcompete(i.e., shade out)weeds. The goal should be to establish a"weed-resistant"plant community to the extent possible. An Integrated Pest Management(Il'M)approach to establishing fa�orable conditions for native plantsand controlling invasive plants should be used. Several references are available on weed control and specialists with the County Noxious Weed Control Board are very knowledgeable of current control strategies. City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan, Dec. 11,2012 $-g SECTIONSIX IMPLEMENTATION PLAN This section addresses an implementation framework for the COSV's shoreline restoration planning as per WAC 173-26-201 (2)(�(vi). An implementation plan must include identified partners,potential funding sources, timelines, and benchmarks. 6.1 POTENTIAL RESTORATION PARTNERS The following organizations have demonstrated an interest in shoreline protection or restoration in the vicinity of Spokane Valley. These organizations may be contacted when seeking partners for restoration project funding, construction, and/or maintenance and monitoring. Table 5: Existing Partnership Opportunities Organization Summary Washington The WCC is an affiliate of the Americorps program administered by Ecology. The Conservation Corps WCC provides members the opportunity to develop skills in environmental (WCC) restoration,trail work, environmental education, and disaster response. City of Spokane Valley Water districts are involved in planning far water use within the COSV. They may be Water Districts interested in partnering on projects that conserve water ar enhance habitat. Friends of the Falls Friends of the Falls is a non-profit arganization working to implement projects identified in the Strategic Master Plan far the Spokane River area. Inland Northwest Land INLT is a local,non-profit,non-political organization with over 450 members. Trust(INLT) Through easements, acquisitions, and by working with other conservation partners, INLT warks to preserve wetlands, shorelines,farmlands, and forests in eastern Washington and northern Idaho. Local Academia Three local colleges have biology programs that include riparian ecology studies. By coardinating with biology professors,the COSV may be able to areate mutually beneficial relationships with their biology studies,particularly with graduate students studying riparian ecology. Gonzaga and Whitworth college have undergraduate biology programs. Eastem Washington University has undergraduate and graduate biology programs. Riverside State Park The foundation is a volunteer group that assists the efforts of State Parks staff by Foundation raising funds far the park, accomplishing specific projects, and being a helpful source for working with the community in many ways. The mission of the foundation is to preserve and protect the natural resources and inherent beauty of Riverside State Park. Sierra Club Upper The Sierra Club is a non-profit volunteer organization that has been working to protect Columbia River Group the natural environment and communities.The club is one of the largest and most influential grassroots environmental organization in the United States. Spokane Audubon The mission of the Spokane Audubon Society is to provide services to the Spokane Society region that allow natural ecosystems to become more healthy,thriving, and restarative, to nurture and protect birds and other wildlife and their habitats, and to encourage biological diversity for the benefit of people and nature in the Spokane region and the world. Spokane Canoe and The Spokane Canoe and Kayak Club is an organization of individuals who are Kayak Club enthusiastic about human-powered watercraft.In recent years the club has participated City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan, Dec. 11,2012 6-1 SECTIONSIX IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Organization Summary in joint habitat restoration projects,including the Spokane River Cleanup and tree plantings at Mirabeau Park. Spokane Conservation The Washington Conservation District Law(RCW 89.08)describes the responsibilities District(SCCD) and purpose of conservation districts,which include: •Conducting education and demonstration projects. •Carrying out improvements to conserve natural resources. •Cooperating ar entering into agreements with others,including other districts. •Making equipment and materials available to landowners to assist them in conserving natural resources. The mission of the SCD is to promote the sustainable use of natural resources within Spokane County. The district provides information on their available programs and services, as well as potential funding sources from outside agencies. Spokane River Forum The forum is a non-profit arganization that creates materials, events, and activities that promote regional dialogs far sustaining a healthy river system while meeting the needs of a growing population. The forum has been involved in various shareline restaration projects,including tree plantings at Mirabeau Park The Lands Council The Lands Council is a Spokane-area grassroots,non-profit organization dedicated to protecting the quality of life in the Inland Northwest. The Lands Council has protected thousands of aares of public land, and in the process worked to preserve farests,water, and wildlife. Trout Unlimited, The mission of Trout Unlimited is to conserve,protect, and restore cold water fisheries, Spokane Falls Chapter their watersheds, and ecosystems as a means of maintaining our quality of life. The Spokane Falls Chapter of Trout Unlimited does this by promoting effective fish management decisions, and by taking an active part in habitat restaration and fish production projects. Veterans Conservation The mission of the Veterans Conservation Corps is to assist veterans by providing Corps training and volunteer opportunities that help to restore and protect Washington state's natural resources. Volunteer and internship opportunities include: •Stream restoration and monitoring •Revegetation of native plants •Restaration of watersheds,forests,prairies or native grasslands •Environmental or community education •Other protection or restaration activities WDFW's Habitat The Restoration Division leads WDFW's efforts to restare and protect aquatic Program,Restoration ecosystems by providing scientific, engineering, and planning expertise through Division cooperative partnerships. The division's focus areas include: •Providing near shore ecosystem assessment, strategic planning, and funding assistance to local communities. •Identifying and prioritizing needed projects to remove fish passage barriers. •Providing training and guidance to local restaration project proponents to help communities inventory fish passage and successfully restore habitat. City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan, Dec. 11,2012 6-2 SECTIONSIX IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Organization Summary • Supporting aquatic habitat restoration by providing environmental engineering review,design, and technical guidance to public and private landowners and restaration entities. In addition to the partnership opportunities listed above, many others are likely. For example, local schools may be interested in supporting shoreline restoration projects. 6.2 POTENTIAL SOURCES OF FUNDING There are several sources of potential funding available to the COSV and potential restoration partners for shoreline restoration projects. This section summarizes the most likely and available funding sources. Potential restoration partners in the Spokane Valley area have indicated that the following grants have been, or are likely to be, used to fund previous shoreline restoration projects. Environmental Protection Agency: • Five-Star Restoration Pro�ram - This grant funds community-based wetland restoration having a strong "on-the-ground" component, with long-term ecological, educational, and/or socio-economic benefits to the community. This grant is available to citizen volunteer organizations, corporations, landowners, federal, state, tribal agencies, local government, charitable foundations, and youth groups. The grant provides $5,000- $20,000 on average. A $10,000 grant requires in-kind or cash match at 1:1. Each project ideally involves five partners. Apply in March - awards in May. For further information contact John Pai, US EPA, Wetlands Division, 202-260-8076,pai.john@epa.gov. http://www.epa.�ov/owow/wetlands/restore/5 star/ U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: • Habitat Conservation - Partners for Fish and Wildlife Pro�ram - This program provides expert technical assistance and cost-share incentives to private landowners to restore fish and wildlife habitats. Any privately owned land is potentially eligible. After signing a cooperative agreement with a minimum duration of 10 years, the landowner works one- on-one with a local Service biologist to develop a project plan addressing the goals and objectives of the landowner and the Service to benefit fish and wildlife species on his/her land. The landowner is reimbursed after project completion, based on the cost-sharing formula in the agreement. For further information contact Juliet Barenti, Eastern Washington Coordinator, 11103 East Montgomery #2, Spokane, WA 99206, 509-893- 8005, Juliet_Barenti@fws.gov. • Upper Columbia Fish and Wildlife Office Recoverv Pro�ram - Recovery grants are available to fund restoration, recovery, assessment, or research projects with an emphasis on well-planned "on-the-ground" projects that restore or enhance fish and wildlife and/or their habitats, benefit federally listed/candidate species and their habitats, or improve listed species numbers. Non-profits and private landowners are eligible. There is no City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan, Dec. 11,2012 6-3 SECTIONSIX IMPLEMENTATION PLAN match requirement; however, projects with some cost share or in-kind support may be prioritized. Proposals are accepted near the beginning of each fiscal year for restoration or recovery projects to be funded during that fiscal year. For further information contact Suzanne Audet at (509) 893-8002, Juliet Barenti at (509) 893-8005, or Greg Van Stralen at (509) 665-3508 ext. 20, or by email at: suzanne_audet@fws.gov, juliet_barenti@fws.gov, or greg_vanstralen@fws.gov. Washington State Department of Ecology: • Centennial Clean Water Fund - Provides funding for activities to reduce nonpoint pollution, comprehensive planning (sewer, storm water, watershed), and/or construction point source facilities. Available to local governments, tribes, and special purpose districts such as sewer, health, conservation districts. The funding is capped at $250,000 for up to four years and requires a 25 percent match except for construction projects, which require a 50 percent match. Funding is awarded annually. Notice and workshops occurs in December and January. Applications are due late February. For further information contact Tim Hilliard at Ecology, (360) 407-6429, thi1461(a�ecv.wa._gov. http://www.ecv.wa.�ov/fap.html • Flood Control Assistance Account Pro_rg am _ This statewide financial assistance program funds proposals that can demonstrate a propensity for preservation, restoration, or enhancement of Endangered Species Act-listed fishery resources through planning or flood damage reduction projects. Any public entity that belongs to the National Flood Insurance Program, including towns, cities, counties, and eligible Native American tribes throughout the state are eligible. Funding is capped at $500,000 per county per biennium and requires a 25-50 percent match, depending on the project. Applications are due in May, with funds available in September. For further information contact Ted Olson at Ecology, (509) 329-3413, to1s461(a�ecv.wa._gov. • Nonpoint Source Implementation Grant (319) Pro�ram - This fund provides grants to local governments, Native American tribes, state agencies, and nonprofit organizations to address identified non-point source pollution and to improve and protect water quality. Grant funds available for each state are determined by an Environmental Protection Agency-developed allocation formula. Grants are awarded annually. For further information contact Helen Bresler at Ecology, (360) 407-6180, hbre461@ecy.wa.gov. • Watershed Plannin� Grant Pro�ram - This program provides funds for the organizational, assessment, and planning phases of watershed related projects. The program requires a 10 percent match for Phase 4 watershed planning implementation. Eligible candidates include government agencies or tribes who wish to apply for grant funds for watershed related projects. To be eligible for Phase 4 funding, the Watershed Plan must have received approval from the planning unit and the county government(s). Grant amounts vary depending on which phase of planning is to be funded and whether projects involve one or more than one WRIA. Grants are funded on a fiscal year basis. Applications are due in June and awards are announced in July. For further information contact Cathy Hubbard, Grants Administrator, at Ecology, (360) 407-6491, cahu461 @ecy.wa.gov. City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan, Dec. 11,2012 6-4 SECTIONSIX IMPLEMENTATION PLAN • Washington Coastal Protection Fund — Terry Husseman Water Qualitv Account - This account is used to fund environmental, recreational, and aesthetic restoration and enhancement projects. Funding is available to local governments, tribes, watershed planning units, nonprofits, and state agencies. Priority is given to projects that involve partnerships with local resources/ volunteers. Requires Ecology partner. Total available funding is $200,000 for all projects. Match not required but given points. Applications are accepted year-round. For further information contact Melissa Gildersleeve, Watershed Coordinator, (360) 407-6548, m�i1461(a�ecv.wa.�ov. Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office: • Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account (ALEA) - This grant supports the purchase, improvement, or protection of aquatic lands for public purposes, including improved accessibiliry. The grant is available to local governments, state agencies, and tribes. Applicants must provide at least 50 percent in matching resources. Projects must be consistent with the local shoreline master program and must be located on lands adjoining a water body that meets the definition of"navigable." For further information contact Kim Sellers, Outdoor Grant Manager, (360)902-3082, kims(a�rco.wa.�ov. Washington State Department of Natural Resources: • Restoration Fundin�Pro�ram — The DNR funds projects associated with its aquatic lands lease program. Funding typically comes from the ALEA, as described above under the Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office. Under the ALEA, the DNR is instructed to ensure that revenue generated from state-owned aquatic land leases goes back to helping restore aquatic environments. Recently, the DNR funded a riparian restoration project at Riverwalk Park in the Ciry of Spokane. For further information contact Monica Shoemaker at(206)799-2949, monica.shoemaker(c(�dnr.wa.�ov. Recreational Equipment Incorporated(REI): • Stewardship Grants - Every year, REI gives 3 percent of its previous year's operating profit to organizations that employees have identified as important players in local conservation activities. In 2010, the company gave $3.7 million in grants to more than 330 groups across the country. The Spokane River Forum is one of three Spokane-area groups to receive an REI grant in 2011. The grant was used to provide improved river access and signage as well as habitat restoration at Mirabeau Park. 6.3 TIMELINE AND BENCHMARKS FOR IMPLEMENTING RESTORATION PLAN Restoration plans involve long-term goals and efforts with major developments generally occurring as funding becomes available. As per WAC 173-26-201(c), master programs must "include planning elements that, when implemented, serve to improve the overall condition of habitat and resources within the shoreline area." To facilitate this policy, this plan outlines five steps that the COSV may pursue to implement the restoration element of the updated SMP and the policies in this plan. The first step will be to establish a restoration program within a department of city government. Within one year of the SMP's formal adoption by the COSV and the state of Washington, the COSV will begin implementing this plan. Implementation City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan, Dec. 11,2012 6-5 SECTIONSIX IMPLEMENTATION PLAN includes the dedication of staff resources and the formation of a central shoreline restoration file that will contain all documents associated with efforts to coordinate, implement, or otherwise support shoreline restoration activities. Once familiar with the goals, policies, and opportunities contained in this plan, COSV staff would begin the second step, outreach activities. Outreach is likely to include efforts to form partnerships on site-specific restoration opportunities, meetings with potential restoration partners to develop inter-agency/department plans for shoreline restoration, and/or efforts to meet with public and private schools to foster shoreline education and volunteer opportunities. Once the COSV has identified potential restoration partners and specific programmatic or site- specific projects, the third step would involve supporting requests for funding. This would likely happen as a parmership with one of the organizations identified in Section 6.1. Applications for funding will likely target one of the sources identified in Section 6.2. The fourth step involves support throughout the construction phase of a restoration activity. Examples of COSV support may include, but are not limited to, provision of city resources such as material transport, site preparation, signage, or public outreach. The fifth and final step would monitor the success of the restoration program, as measured by meeting the benchmarks of this plan, and assess the existing program based on monitoring results. The results of this assessment will document progress in implementing the restoration element of the SMP and aid in determining whether a subsequent update is necessary to the SMP, as required under RCW 90.58.080(4). While exact dates cannot be specified for these five steps due to uncertainties in the SMP update adoption schedule and funding availability, Table 6 provides a target timeline to aid in conceptualizing the process. Benchmarks associated with each implementation step were developed to provide a means of demonstrating progress and compliance with SMP restoration goals. Because of uncertain external funding sources and partnership opportunities, benchmarks for site-specific restoration projects are not the focus of this plan. Dates associated with each benchmark are based on an estimated formal SMP update adoption date on or before December 31, 2012. A later adoption date would affect the timeline relative to the period of delay. Benchmark dates are not meant to impede any progress that might occur prior to the date given; any early shoreline restoration progress should be documented and stored in the COSV's files. Table 6: Timeline and Benchmarks Year Step Description Benchmark Ending 1 2013 COSV allocates resources for portion of COSV verifies that sufficient resources have been one full time employee(10-25%) as per allocated by 12/31/2013. COSV will create a this plan. shareline restoration project file to store and track progress. 2 2014 COSV restaration staff has met with COSV will have met with potential restoration several key groups to create partnerships partners. Meetings minutes will be documented on specific shoreline restaration projects. and stared in restaration project file. COSV restaration staffhas met with other COSV departments to look for shoreline restoration opportunities associated with City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan, Dec. 11,2012 6-6 SECTIONSIX IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Year Step Description Benchmark Ending proposed CIPs within SMP jurisdiction. 3 2016 COSV,in partnership with others,will COSV will participate in one ar mare apply for restaration funding. applications for restaration funding in partnership with arganizations identified through outreach activities by 12/31/2016. 4 2018 COSV supports funded restoration COSV will provide support(as described in proj ects, as able,with materials, Section 6.3,above)for at least one restoration transportation, site preparation, signage, project by 12/31/2018. engineering, etc. 5 2020 COSV monitors progress of program and COSV will monitar the progress and success of specific opportunities. COSV assesses the COSV's restaration program,as per Section progress,determines need far additional 71 of this report by 12/31/2020. SMP updates. City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan, Dec. 11,2012 6-7 SECTIONSEVEN MONITORING,MAINTENANCE,ANDADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT 7.1 MONITORING PLAN This section provides steps for monitoring the successful implementation of this plan as well as a process for monitoring site-specific restoration projects. Monitoring data will be utilized for ongoing maintenance strategies, adaptive management, future grant applications, and subsequent SMP updates. 7.1.1 Monitoring of Plan Benchmarks The following monitoring methods are designed to document progress with the implementation of this restoration plan. Proposed monitoring activities are tied to the benchmarks established in Table 6, above. Future SMP updates will benefit from data collected in this regard. Monitoring will highlight where the COSV's plan is most successful and where it may need improvement prior to the next round of SMP updates. Benchmark 1: Allocate staff resources by 2013. Monitorin� Method: Review and evaluate annual restoration budget to determine if existing funding is sufficient to support implementation of restoration goals. Contin�ency: Request budget summary for projects with restoration element. Ada�tive Mana_eg ment: If the COSV cannot allocate financing for staff to implement a restoration program, the responsibiliry may need to be parsed out and delegated to a variety of departments. If this is the case, it will be important to ha�e a central shoreline restoration file to track overall progress. Benchmark 2: Meet with potential restoration partners by the end of 2014. Monitorin� Method: Document that meetings have occurred or that an attempt was made to schedule meetings. Contin�ency: Document internal COSV meetings where restoration concepts were incorporated into shoreline development projects, such as new bridge work. Adaptive Mana�ement: If the COSV is unsuccessful at organizing a meeting with potential restoration partners, the COSV may delegate COSV's position to a restoration partner with demonstrated restoration goals that complement those of the COSV. Benchmark 3: Apply for funding by 2016 (with partners). Monitorin�Method: Document application for restoration funding. Contin_gencX: Document why no action was made (e.g., lack of partners, staff una�ailable, etc.) and how to ensure future action. Ada�tive Mana_e� ment: If the COSV is unable to partner on restoration funding applications for any reason, the COSV may alternately seek funding through council for programmatic restoration opportunities within the COSV, examples of which are provided in Section 5.1. Benchmark 4: COSV will participate in and provide support for a restoration project by the end of 2018. Monitorin�Method: Document participation in a restoration project. City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan, Dec. 11,2012 7-1 SECTIONSEVEN MONITORING,MAINTENANCE,ANDADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT Contin_gencX: Summarize attempts made to assist restoration projects and revise strategy to a method more capable of yielding results. Ada�tive Mana_eg ment: If the COSV is unable for any reason to support a restoration project, the COSV may revise its strategy for obtaining restoration partners and implementing restoration projects. Benchmark 5: Monitor and summarize success of implementing restoration plan by 2020. Monitoring Method: COSV may prepare status reports documenting the COSV's progress toward achieving the goal and policies of this plan, recommended adaptive management strategies, and the need for updating the restoration plan during the next cycle of SMP updates. Contin�ency: Document cause of noncompliance with SMP/failure to implement. Ada�tive Mana_eg ment: COSV will revise strategy based on experience over the first five years since restoration plan was implemented. 7.1.2 Restoration Site Monitoring Several of the site-specific restoration activities are similar in nature. Due to this fact, it is especially important to monitor the success of individual restoration activities so that subsequent restoration projects can be modified based on the particular successes and failures of each completed project. In addition to monitoring new shoreline restoration projects, it is advisable that the COSV or their parmer contact existing shoreline restoration project proponents to see if they are monitoring their restoration projects and, if so, if they will share their monitoring data. When applying for restoration project funding, the COSV and partners should include funding for follow up monitoring in the funding application. Monitoring data can be used to direct maintenance activities and demonstrate that the COSV is following through on the grant-funded projects. In addition, it can ensure grantors that future grant-funded restoration projects will have the benefit of lessons learned from past projects. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Ecosystem Management and Restoration Research Program provides the following description of the process for implementing monitoring for riparian restoration projects: The general process for implementing riparian restoration and monitoring is outlined in five basic steps. These include: (1) setting goals and objectives, (2) developing a monitoring protocol, (3) designing and implementing data collection, (4) analyzing and interpreting monitoring data, and(5) assessing restoration efforts. This process is helpful for monitoring all shoreline projects described by this plan. Additional detail for each of the five steps is provided in the literature (Guilfoyle and Fischer 2006). 7.2 MAINTENANCE Maintenance responsibilities will depend on the specific project and the dynamics of the partnership between the COSV and its restoration partner(s). Maintenance is an important aspect of project completion. The COSV is already committed to maintaining various areas under its park maintenance responsibilities. Often these overlap with State Parks' maintenance responsibilities throughout Riverside Park. City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan, Dec. 11,2012 7-2 SECTIONSEVEN MONITORING,MAINTENANCE,ANDADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT Specific maintenance activities will depend on site conditions and monitoring results. For example, restoration projects proposed at sites with identified noxious vegetation will need to maintain weed population reductions. City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan, Dec. 11,2012 7-3 SECTIONEIGHT REFERENCES Covich et. al. 1999. The Role of Benthic Invertebrate Species in Freshwater Ecosystems. Bioscience. Vol. 49, No. 2. February 1999. Ecology (Washington State Department of Ecology ). 2002. Washington State Wetland Evaluation Study, Phase 2: Evaluating Success. Ecology publication #02-06-009. Lacey, W ashington. Ecology. 2003. Introduction to Washington's Shoreline Management Act (RCW 90.58). Ecology Publication 99-113 (2003). Lacey, Washington 2 pp. Ecology. 2004 Restoration Planning and the 2003 Shoreline Management Guidelines. Ecology Publication#04-06-022. Lacey, Washington. 7pp. Ecology. 2005. Draft Cleanup Action Plan, Spokane River Upriver Dam PCB Site, Spokane, WA. Toxics Cleanup Program, Eastern Regional Office. Spokane, WA. Ecology. 2006. Spokane River Water Quality Managed Implementation Plan. Spokane, WA. Ecology. 2010a. Shoreline Master Program Handbook. Ecology Publication #11-06-010. Lacey, W ashington. Ecology. 2010b. Spokane River and Lake Spokane Dissolved Oxygen Total Maximum Daily Load: Water Quality Improvement Report. Ecology Publication#07-10-073. Lacey, WA. GEI Consultants. 2004. Intermountain Province Subbasin Plan. Prepared for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council. Spokane, Washington Hoag, C. and J. Fripp (Prepared by), for Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 2002. Streambank Soil Bioengineering Field Guide for Low Precipitation Areas. USDA NRCS Plant Material Center, Aberdeen, ID. Guilfoyle and Fischer. 2006. Guidelines for establishing monitoring programs to assess the success of riparian restoration efforts in arid and semi-arid landscapes. US Army Corps of Engineers Ecosystem Management and Restoration Research Program. Technical Note ERDC TN-EMRRP-SR-50 Spokane County Conservation District (SCCD). 2005. Spokane County Proper Functioning Condition Stream Inventory & Assessment. Spokane, WA. State Parks (Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission). 2005. Riverside State Park Management Plan. Olympia, WA. URS Corporation. 2010. City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program Update, Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report. Spokane Valley, WA. Webster.2007. New MillenniumTM Dictionary of English, Preview Edition (v 0.9.7) Copyright �2003-2007 Lexico Publishing Group, LLC City Council Draft COSV Shoreline Restoration Plan, Dec. 11,2012 g-1 FIGURES City Council Draft COS V Shoreline Restoration Plan, Dec. 11, 2012 APPENDIK A City Council Draft COS V Shoreline Restoration Plan, Dec. 11, 2012 ��,��_.; �.�.x �� r � t `� � 1, � ,.�, � r;� .: F,-.."� +�,y�,,,yi$` �,� ._ _. ;y,,ig�`�'�y< �7,�:.. y 'm��+Ty-a.� ,y Y�YK S �� i�,� 3"- � � � pp�._ � . . � �� 3p�^yc3.�^� �+�,r^i l,�' w f:� j ` • ft7/ � .{'x � �.�"�qY+e�s�" �,�y��-� 'f . . . . � . . � r . ;�' ' v� '�' .. . ,� �'. ' : r�V �.. � .. ' ' .. �� _ y�,�� ..�� '.1�?��w`"�,;�� 4' i . - .. `�� _ �' *�� F d �1�� •�!�E•�' 'te �t �i. � . . r�r�T{�n' ��J! � x ��4�� r ,�r t�,.,. �� . . _ A. °I. � 4Y _ \\ 4 '.� �1�4�� .`� � . F ,� '"`'a�_.'� �, ��pp,�s °,. ,; �: % �" < L ��Y� / � ' — L � "— - '� � �:� �pp � _ __ – ;s''� ' — � �f � -. � ,l�'�a r ' "�./ f' � .: � �,pp#� �— � �/ / . . ��.:, � -. �ppp�#4� _ � �.°- � \\ � , _ � .r �f � . � . , o�� - � � _ '.. ` / � . ��_ � - � �' � ��p�� , >� _ .� �, �� "—� oac�s . o`ap�1»z`� � � � '�,,, �� , � . �, . � � , ��\,��- �� . � '��, * -: ,' �� _ I " �,"� < y � �� , . � /� �:�,..11�� _ .;� "� �-� �., • � / ,nt �r r� � ri: � � �� IN �� ? � � �� .. ",�� ,�c��4 ', ,. ,,. \ 4 ' , ° , I � � � I � * � . � .� _ , . +F * p...s �� op , � opp.N�o Legend �;; 3 '�,'�y�, t � �� , �p�,,, L ��City of Spokane Valley � �I. J-�- �� _ �_f �_ �,�� '��'�� PP# ..� '. "" �a� h1�, •� �'S1�� - ��,:� ' � - � �.,. ;i.'�. 4' _=CentennialTreil ��N � � � ` � ` _ �-n �Paroels at river inside ciry limits Dreft Environment Designation Map W�E 0 02 0.4 Ciry of Spokane Valley Miles Shoreline Master Progrem Updates S Figure 2-A SepL 19,2012 � M . �! � �r��.'l� f �.I � .. - , r...�r'".YT �_, N ' S I'� � i � I i�I��i. — o {'� ` .:- -- z y i�; r � � { � f � ��9 : r .._ . a � I '. �;�' �:� . ,,1;i. � k, , .,.n.��.:, , .� 1 � ��' . ... ., F.� -. .� .. :. � ._. . .: _.. � o � r �'; � _ � r` $ .. ��.: . � . . �; . . .' � a � � . `...Opp.#8 .• . , s 5k;:'7! " � � + ��,. I .:: ��t. .,� Is -'��' � . � �I .�� ". _ _"'.��; - !•;k 1 jr� y , •� �. ,M1��rµ��. - � � � . _ �,- _ .,�� :. 'G 1 '��' �rfl- a , � � , ��°."'r'�'��. � f � ` Y �„" � �r � �I F r �1�� _ � i_ �� r �I I � �� , 1 4+�.�� a�� 3�� = '� �. � .. r . ,��'- -.- R.�. �V � ��f _ x,.as..�.�� F . _` ,Sr> �,{ � . � �Y�r'__ �• .. � � ��.�' , r � Opp.#9 �.1��__�.-w--�. . . � � ... . , ��"��41 .�1 �' ��. � � t._ f� � 1 .� �. r �f� �,� - . , , _. 11 � � 4 I ' � � �, .. o'pdp.Ni o opp:»i� _ y . `��_ � ,(� .��` r�� , �,.:� 'v�" ,; _ �;s' �..�- �� A` � �—��s . ... � ��..`�� "-��. Cpp.�12 �. ��..,d ... ,. . �� _ � , > i O p 9 y � ,� �- �ll ��_ _ � � ��8 Opp#13�pP.#94 y� � i �� , �� .�• � �. �pp S � i r / , �o ��.�r�� '� � y , r , , ,, . . F. �� _ . Opp.w16 � ( "Opp�26 —� u � � (� — T � � � opp.�zs � -�'�1' � � � �, i---i o�----.. � . � - ��a ,y � �� .� . � �; �pp:,�\ � � � � � � � o,p��4 � �- , , `` � •� ��-: , � t o �'�" op\� �u � , �, � �'� . I � � � '._�..:3.x-..��d'- .... � - -,�.�,�--s� � � / L S�\�� .._J. `�3 �pp`.#19 — ,. .. � , � � - � - �; Legend ' �'� _` .� . , � �\ popp.tt2o p p Nz3.��> _ -�l� �'�; - � ��Ciry of Spokane Valley ; �-� - ,�{ �- K ' - ° � __��O p;r2.3 " �PP'# .�r � ' .-��1�'�� .�. ... ��P't .�. l' _' _ Opp J �.. _ _",.. v �t '"' ..,. . . ��.es ,:� c�.'� ` . ,.:, : �.. . .. � . . - . - �� r��. ;��... _=Centenn ial Treil N �Paroels at river inside ciry limits Dreft Environment Designation Map W�E 0 02 0.4 Ciry of Spokane Valley Miles Shoreline Master Progrem Updates S Figure 2-B SepL 19,2012 _— . rt�..� .. r_ - . ., - � .. � a�i i � , . , . ' ° , _ .1— - �� ,E � . .� , � � ,_� _ , I �I . _ . i .. ... ,, � � � � i ��,�^�°"i n^} �� ',� _ Il�i. ' >A ' . � � , p}'r'"' . � �—=' .. �,,/° . , . ��y , . �1� . � . � � , � , � , =," � � �� i 7 {� t��r�;��^rl= � -( �-. m'�"� .. so�iae�o��s o�onebstta -- �.:� � I '�� '4 ` i {„ � _'��- s L4.i� � y, � � � �� '_ � i.y � T� F� 7��. . . �� r�. �Opp.32 � 1 �t r� a' ' '� � � �� ,3�'� � a t � � i �Iy��'+!� i� .. k � � � �i�1��, ��.��. w ��e� � ;��.�J-'1° B�iS.�� ` .��-9� ^ � ..,�....� . .,. .�� t.n' Y.; '�' - - - r i� �� opp �,s,a � uFi � �. i� �-__ �^ � �:'� J` r- -' � c.� ��-�� 1 '� ` � .-i �� '/ 6��h `°��` ��"t�� g .Tr.� �, . � / i:-�� . I��. � ,� �_� f�' `��!' ��4 t � � . . � ,'a. '��pp 36 '° y ` ��1 � li ' � ,./ . i . � . �� /9�-' '�t�J " I �pp#30 .. . � �� . �s � .r""'"",� F � � Opp u37�'iL ,.-°�. .` ,° ,¢"� � � .� q � , � � \ �. ..c�°� . /_ � 1� '\.��,;�'. � _.' __ �-�pp Y33 �pp�.N35 \,,.V �!� �l� ��` �:.. � Opp 34 - � J� _ Opp.�9% L }. { � �� f ;� � o'ap�a ,��'" o- �.. , I,` .� _ � I ` tic �r � '� � ' �� -•J � ��, ,JJ_I— , , �r?�;,�:i:� ��. � '/ - h�� 1 �li�� . ��-� �v�T � �..,�a��. a � S3 . �" � opp�zs I 3�!' � �� r � 1 ��3:f1 t'�� r'��-�„-` � ,� =.-_` J� �\'3� � a �- S�G� j�� `�F , �� `l yy�R I �� '�kk� �r a� � ��'��/�#�rc�l� � `V ` � � � i1� i P. , x�' r.` � °i .� l" s 1 ,:-,��\�y r :.'.� 7k��,n a T� opp»zs r y�.�i',!_ "� i�',�I � ,. ; rF;til,;.�., Yt !`*°1� � '''4� ��.�1 �- _�� } ,�; �, 1� � Ik�. ��w�, i � �; �� `I� j . : i � I �/F � '� �, ��, r �y� � �� ,-,�'�� 1.-�,,�i' � � j„r�.�.-� ��,�I��7s�'-�'.�5�,��', �d -�. 1 4�< �� r��'r' " , � � �r '�,_,��4� - opp �4 ;� � --��; � " i i �r��s � ., �� f� �- 1 f`j�'� iY,1�_ , � ,� .'� 1 � ��E t��'�,;.+�I�r��.,��'' =' t� �. I r� � ..� ? �� • .�_n,.�� 1 ..,. � �.e �k 1�r Legend � ��" a� � ��,� _ _ r' � � � � �� i "��,�� .�.: � � ,J.�a; r , � .. ��.r � �:E �..:`�'`�E � Cit of 5 okane Valle �' L ,�"r'-'� ��,� • L.�.� v a v �/ _ �:,-, �:5 �. . ��^ � �. :, . �r { -�' C .. ;:� , , .� �, , �._ ,. - . �� =� .._ � � y I .,��-��. �.pl p y ��— �PP�# � R,�f. �� ,'� _ _=Centenn ial Treil N , �Paroels at river inside ciry limits Dreft Environment Designation Map W�E 0 02 0.4 Ciry of Spokane Valley Miles Shoreline Master Progrem Updates S Figure 2-C SepL 19,2012 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 11, 2012 Department Director Approval: � Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business � new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed Resolution 12-013 Adopting Master "No Trucks" and "Local Delivery Only" Schedule. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 9.30.030(C); Washington Administrative Code 308-330-265(17), adopted by the City through SVMC chapter 9.05 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None on Resolution 12-013 BACKGROUND: The City has a number of existing signs depicting areas where it is not legal to drive commercial trucks, which signs were approved by the Board of County Commissioners and erected by Spokane County prior to incorporation of the City. After incorporation, the City did not take specific legislative action to authorize the enforcement of those areas where commercial trucks are prohibited. The Council has determined that it wants to provide that authority. This master schedule identifies with specificity each of those areas. The Council may amend the master schedule by either adding or removing areas, which would be done by subsequent resolution, and in accordance with the requirements of the new City Code provisions in SVMC 9.30. OPTIONS: (1) move to approve Resolution 12-013 as drafted; or (2) request revisions to Resolution 12-013. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move that we approve Resolution 12-013 Adopting the Master "No Trucks" and "Local Delivery Only" Schedule. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney; Inga Note, Senior Traffic Engineer ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 12-013 Adopting the Master "No Trucks" and "Local Delivery Only" Schedule DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 12-013 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON,ADOPTING A MASTER"NO TRUCKS"AND "LOCAL DELIVERY ONLY"SCHEDULE PURSUANT TO SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 9.30.030(C),AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 930.030(C) to require that the location of signs in the City depicting that"No Trucks" and "Local Delivery Only"be set forth in a Master"No Trucks" and"Local Delivery Only" Schedule; and WHEREAS, the City shall henceforth use a resolution to establish or modify where "No Trucks" and"Local Delivery Only" signs shall be placed in the City; and WHEREAS, the City Senior Traffic Engineer shall conduct an engineering and traffic investigation pursuant to Washington Administrative Code 308-330-265(17), adopted by the City through SVMC chapter 9.05, for all proposed changes to the Master "No Trucks" and "Local Delivery Only" Schedule, which shall be reasonable and safe, and in the interest of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of this City. NOW THEREFORE,be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, as follows: Section 1. Ado�tion of the Master "No Trucks" and "Local Deliverv Only" Schedule. The Master"No Trucks" and"Local Delivery Only" Schedule, as set forth below,is adopted. Section 2. Repeal. To the extent that any previous actions to establish "No Trucks" or "Local Delivery Only" signs are inconsistent with those set forth herein, they are repealed. Section 3. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. Approved this day of December, 2012. ATTEST: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Thomas E. Towey, Mayor Approved as to form: Office of the City Attorney Resolution 12-013 Master"No Trucks"and"Local Delivery Only" Schedule Page 1 of 2 DRAFT MASTER "NO TRUCKS" SCHEDULE The following road sections located in the City of Spokane Valley shall be restricted to truck travel as set forth in Spokane Valley Municipal Code 930.030 by placement of a "No Trucks" sign, which may be posted in conjunction with a"Local Delivery Only" sign. Road Segment(s) Zone Limits Location Jackson Avenue Montgomery Drive to Wilbur Road 519, T25N., R.44E.W.M. Wilbur Road Jackson Avenue to Montgomery Drive 519, T25N., R.44E.W.M. Grace Avenue Bowdish Road to SR-27 5.9, T25N., R.44 E.W.M Buckeye Avenue Bowdish Road to SR-27 5.9, T25N., R.44 E.W.M Lily Road SR-290 to Montgomery Drive 512, T25N., R.43 E.W.M. Girard Road SR-290 to Montgomery Drive 512, T25N., R.43 E.W.M. Bowman Road SR-290 to Montgomery Drive 512, T25N., R.43 E.W.M. Montgomery Drive Lily Road to Park Road 512, T25N., R.43 E.W.M. Area bordered by Park Road, SR-290, Argonne Road, and I-90 5.7, T25N., R.44 E.W.M. Vista Road Broadway Avenue to Mission Avenue 518, T25N., R.44 E.W.M. Mission Avenue Vista Road to Marguerite Road 5.18, T25N., R.44 E.W.M. Maxwell Avenue Wilbur Road to SR-27 516, T25N., R.44 E.W.M Wilbur Road Maxwell Avenue to Mission Avenue 5.16, T25N., R.44 E.W.M Bradley Road SR-290 to Marietta Avenue 512, T25N., R.43 E.W.M. Dora Road SR-290 to Mansfield Avenue 512, T25N., R.43 E.W.M. Coleman Road SR-290 to Utah Avenue 512, T25N., R.43 E.W.M. Park Road Addition Subdivision south of Mission Avenue, 513, T25N., R.43 E.W.M. west of Park Road, and north of I-90 Clinton Road Sprague Avenue to Main Avenue 515, T25N., R.44 E.W.M. Main Avenue McDonald Road to Clinton Road 5.15, T25N., R.44 E.W.M. Wellesley Avenue City limits to Evergreen Road S3, T25N., R.44 E.W.M. Resolution 12-013 Master"No Trucks"and"Local Delivery Only" Schedule Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SP(�KANE VALLEY Request for Council Act�on Meeting Date: December 1�, 2012 Department Directar Approval: � Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ o!d business �C]new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑admin, report ❑pending legislation [] exacutive s�ssion AGENDA ITEM TITLE: I�roposed Resal�tion 12-014; 2013 Fee Schedul�. GOV�RNING L�GIS�.ATf�N: The Niaster Fee Sche�ule setking 2�12 fees was established via Resolution #11-008 and was adopted �y the City Council or� Octaber 25, 2011. PREVIOUS COUN�IL ACTION TAKEN; On Deeember �4, 2�12, the Cauncil considered an Administrative Report on the proposec� resolution establishing 2�13 fees, but na fiarmal act�on has been taken to �afe. BACKGROUND: Pa�t of the annual operating budget developm��t pracess involves City Departments reviewing the Master Fee Schedufe that is currently �n �lace, and c�etermining whether changes in the fees c�argad andlor language used in the gouerning resalution should be altered, R�commended changes to the fee resolu#ion Enclude: • Rernaval of Scheduae C pertaining to the Fire Code and fees assessed by the Spokane �/alley Fire Department as a result of #he re�ised Interlocal Agreement with that body that was approved by the City Council on February 28, 20'�2. The new bnterloca[ agreerrh�nt specifles that the City wiil collect on behalf of the Fire Departm�nt fees that are set and periodically updated by the Fire Deparlment. � The Parks and �recreation Deparkment 9s proposing changes to the fea resolution for same new programslfees to cor�side� as welf as #he elimination of feas that do �at apply. Additionally, they are suggesting the fee structure listin� be re-formatted to make ik easier#a read. Lastly they a�e praposing to form�lize language providing authorizatian for the Director to implement a business incentive policy that h�as been kested in 20�2. The �o[icy invalves a rental rate reduction for group� #hat m��t eertain criteria per reservation which includes a minimum number of partici,par�ts, frequent use of classroam at CenterPlace in a calendar year and the use of o�r in-house caterer far meals at all reservations, Pra,pased Chan�es Include: o Add a Children's Birkhday Party Package ta CenterPl�ce rentals. This would include a 2 hr. rentai for up to 12 children, themed decorations, games & activiti�s and a host— Cost to be $175 Q lnc�ease Svwimming Lessans fee from $30 to $35 � Inc�ease Swim Team Fee from $35 #o $�5 � Add Discov�ry Piayground Shelter resen+ations - $3�for up to 2 hrs. � Eiiminate the lndoor Use Fees—they do nat apply r� Add a Business Incentive Policy Category under CenterPlace— Language would read as follows: The 'Parks & Recreatian �irector has the authority to reduce the roam �enkal rake b� '[ hr. +rvh�n the rent�9 meets t�e following criteria: minimum of 25 participants, use nf a classra4m 8 or more tir�es in a calendar year and use nf our in-hause caterer far a meal at each r�serva#ior�. � Re-format the Par�CS & Recreation section for�asier readin�. IISV-FS21UserslmcalhounlF�ee Resolutronlf2esolutr`on for2093 Fees12042 92 1 i RCA forFee Resolutron motron consideration,docx OPTI+ONS: �) Procaed with tha u,�dated fe� resolution changes as �resented this ev�ning, 2) Proceed with portions o�the updated fee resolutior� presented this evening, 3) Do not maEce any changes. R�CQMMENDED ACTION OR M�TI�N: Move to approve R�solufion #12-014 amen�ing the Mastee Fee Schedule for 2013. BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPAGTS: Tha proposed changes are not expected #a have a significartt im�act on 2013 r�venues but i� is noteworthy khat in t�e 2012 Budget, revenues gen�rat�d by the fee resolutian include: • �1,896,800, or 5.43% of total Gen�ral Fund recurring revenues of$34,908,8�0. • $1,750,000 Qr 99.72% of total Stormwater Nianagement Fund reWenues of$1,755,000, STAFF GD�ITACT: Mark Calhoun, Finance Director ATTACHMENT�: • A 14-page "dean �copy" of the R�solution #'E2-034. • A four-page mema prepared by fhe Gommuniky Deuelc�pment D�partment in Oc�ober 2011 �hat provides camparative ir�farma#ion with o�her loc�! municipalities relaked to fees an� turnaround times at #�ak point in time. • A two-page memo prepared by the Parks and Recreatiorr Department in October 20�1 that provides comparative information with otF�er iocal municipaFities r�lated ta fees at that point in �ime. 11SV-�S2lUserslmcalhounlFee Resolufio�lResolufion for2013 Fees120�2 12 99 RCA farFee Resolution motion considei�atinn.docx DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 12-014 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING RESOLUTION 11-008 AND APPROVING AN AMENDED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE. WHEREAS, it is the general policy of the City to establish fees that are reflective of the cost of services provided by the City; and WHEREAS, the City uses a resolution to establish fees for City programs, permits and services, and periodically the fee resolution must be amended to incorporate new or modified services; and WHEREAS, Council desires to amend the Resolution and accompanying Fee Schedule. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County,Washington,as follows: Section 1. The amendments needed at this time are incorporated into the attached schedules and include new fees and changes to existing fees. Section 2. Repeal. To the extent that previous fee schedules are inconsistent with those set forth herein,they are repealed in their entirety. Section 3. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect January 1, 2013. Approved this day of December, 2012. ATTEST: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Thomas E. Towey, Mayor Approved as to form: Office of the City Attorney Resolutionl2-014 Amending Fee Schedule for 2013 Page 1 of 14 DRAFT MASTER FEE SCHEDULE Fee Schedule Pa�e No. Schedule A: Planning 3 Schedule B: Building 5 Schedule C: Parks and Recreation 10 Schedule D: Administrative 13 Schedule E: Other Fees 13 Schedule F: Police Fees 14 Resolutionl2-014 Amending Fee Schedule for 2013 Page 2 of 14 DRAFT MASTER FEE SCHEDULE Schedule A — Planning FEE AMOUNT AMENDMENTS Comprehensive Plan Amendment $1,500.00 Zoning or other code text amendment $1,500.00 APPEALS Appeal ofAdministrative Decision $1,050.00 Appeal of Hearing Examiner Findings $315.00 Transcript/record deposit on Appeals of Hearing Examiner Decisions $157.00 Appeal of Administrative Decision-Code Compliance Notice and Order 500.00 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT(SEPA) Single Dwelling (when required) $100.00 All other developments $350.00 Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) Review,minimum deposit $2,200.00 Addenda of existing EIS Review $350.00 SHORELINE Substantial Development Permit $840.00 CRITICAL AREAS Floodplain Permit $315.00+$52.00 per lot OTHER PERMITS Home Occupation Permit and Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) $84.00 Conditional Use Permit $840.00 Temporary Use Permit $157.00 LAND USE ACTIONS Subdivisions Preliminary plat $2,324.00+$40.00 per lot Final Plat $1,424.00+$10.00 per lot Time extensions—file review and letter $80.00 Short Plats Preliminary 2 to 41ots $1,224.00 Final plat 2 to 41ots $924.00 Preliminary plat 5 to 91ots $1,424.00+$25.00 per lot Final plat 5 to 91ots $1,224.00+$10.00 per lot Time extensions—file review and letter $80.00 Resolutionl2-014 Amending Fee Schedule for 2013 Page 3 of 14 DRAFT Plat Alteration Subdivision plat $682.00 Short plat $278.00 Binding Site Plan Binding site plan alteration $278.00. Change of Conditions $650.00 Preliminary binding site plan $1,674.00 Final Binding Site Plan $924.00 Aggregation/Segregation Lot line adjustment $105.00 Lot line elimination $105.00 Zero lot line $105.00+$10.00 per lot Plat Vacation $1,474.00 SIGNS Review of permanent sign $50.00 +$25.00 if public works review needed Review of temporary sign $50.00 NEW RESIDENTIAL SITE PLAN REVIEW $50 SITE PLAN REVIEW -PER DIVISION REVIEW $275 STREET VACATION APPLICATION $1,365.00 OTHER Administrative Exception $315.00 Variance $1,575.00 Administrative Interpretations $100.00 Pre-application Meetings $250.00 Fee will be deducted from land use application, building permit or commercial permit application fee when application is filed within one year of pre-application meeting ZONING Zoning map amendments (rezone)* $1,650.00 Planned residential development plan $1,575.00+$26.00 per lot Planned residential development modification $525.00 Zoning letter $210.00 *If rezone is combined with other action(s), cost of other action(s)is additional Resolutionl2-014 Amending Fee Schedule for 2013 Page 4 of 14 DRAFT Schedule B — Building Fee Payment Plan review fees are collected at the time of application. Such fees may be adjusted during plan review. Overages or under payments will be appropriately adjusted at the time of permit issuance. Plan review fees are separate from and additional to building permit fees. Permit fees and any other unpaid fees are collected prior to issuance of the permit. Fees for outside professional services required during the permit process will be paid by the applicant. Examples of outside professional services include review by contract reviewers, special inspection or construction services, consultant services for special topics, surveying or other services required to determine compliance with applicable codes. Fee Refund Policy. Refunds authorized under this policy apply only to Schedule B. PLAN REVIEW FEES • Plan review fees are non-refundable once any plan review work has been started. • Paid plan review fees will be refunded when an eligible request is received in writing. • As a minimum, a$35.00 administrative fee will be retained. • If the paid plan review fee is less than$35.00,no refund is authorized. • If the paid plan review fee is more than $35.00,the amount for refund will be calculated at the rate of 100%of the paid plan review fee minus $35.00. PERMIT FEES • Permit fees are non-refundable once work authorized by the permit has begun. • Paid permit fees will be refunded when an eligible request is received in writing. • As a minimum, a$35.00 administrative fee will be retained. • If the paid permit fee is less than $35.00,no refund is authorized. • If the paid permit fee is more than $35.00,the refund will be calculated at the rate of 95°/o of the paid permit fee minus $35.00. For any application taken or permit issued in error, a full refund of fees paid will be made. No portion of the paid fees will be retained. FEES GENERAL Hourly Rate for City Employees $61.00 Overtime rate for City Employees (1.5 times regular rate) $92.00 Investigation fee: Work commenced without required permits Equal to permit fee Replacement of lost permit documents Hourly rate; 1 hour minimum Revisions to plans requested by the applicant or permit holder will be charged the hourly rate with a minimum of one hour. Revised plans submitted in response to reviewer correction letters are not subject to the hourly assessment. Washington State Building Code Council Surcharge (WSBCC) $4.50 per permit WSBCC Surcharge (Multi-Family) $4.50 lst dwelling unit+ $2.00 each additional unit Resolutionl2-014 Amending Fee Schedule for 2013 Page 5 of 14 DRAFT BUILDING PERMIT: Building permit fees for each project are set by the following fees. The figures below are to be used to determine the building permit fees and plans check fees based on the value of the construction work as stated by the applicant or the value calculated by the Building Official using the latest valuation data published in the Building Safety Journal by the International Code Council,whichever value is greater. Valuations not listed in the Building Safety Journal: Buildin� Type Valuation Per Square Foot Residential garages/storage buildings (wood frame) $19.00 Residential garages (masonry) $22.00 Miscellaneous residential pole buildings $19.00 Residential carports, decks,porches $15.00 Building Permit Fee Calculation Total Valuation Buildin�Permit Fee $1.00 to $25,000.00 $6925 for first$2,000.00 + $14.00 for each additional $1,000.00 (or fraction thereo fl Up to and including $25,000.00 $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $391.25 for first$25,000 + $10.10 for each additional $1,000.00 (or fraction thereo fl Up to and including $50,000.00 $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $643.75 for first$50,000.00 + $7.00 for each additional $1,000.00 (or fraction thereo fl Up to and including $100,000.00 $100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $993.75 for first$100,000 + $5.60 for each additional $1,000.00 (or fraction thereo fl Up to and including $500,000.00 $500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $3,233.75 for first$500,000.00 + $4.75 for each additional $1,000.00 (or fraction thereo fl Up to and including $1,000,000.00 $1,000,001 and up $5,608.75 for first$1,000,000.00 + $3.15 for each additional $1,000.00 (or fraction thereo fl Plan Review Fee Calculation %of Buildin�Permit Fee Plans review fee (general) 65°/a Plans review fee—Group R-3 occupancies (single family less than 7,999 sq ft) 40°/o Plans review fee—Group R-3 occupancies (single family 8,000 sq ft ar more) 65°/o Plans review fee—Group U occupancies(sheds,barns,et.) 25°/o Initial Plan Review Fees are capped at$35,000 not including pass-through expenses for outside review as noted in the "Fee Payment" section of this schedule. Resolutionl2-014 Amending Fee Schedule for 2013 Page 6 of 14 DRAFT OTHER BUILDING PERMITS: Over-the-Counter Service $61.00 flat fee Demolition Permit Single Family Residence $46.00 flat fee Commercial Buildings $131.00 flat fee Garage or accessory building associated with residence or commercial building $21.00 flat fee Foundation Only: 25%of building permit fee Swimming Pools, over 5,000 gallons $52.00+ plumbing fees Re-roof(no plan review charge unless submitted for review) Based on Project Valuation Change of Use or Occupancy Classification Permit Hourly Towers, elevated tanks, antennas Hourly GRADING PERMIT: 100 cubic yards (cu yd) or less $21.00 101 to 1,000 cubic yards $21.00 for first 100 cu yd. + $7.00 each additional 100 cu yd 1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards $88.00 for first 1,000 cu yd+ $6.00 each additional 1,000 cu yd 10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards $154.00 for first 10,000 cu yd+ $15.00 each additional 10,000 cu yd 100,001 to 200,000 cubic yards $386.00 for first 100,000 cu yd+ $15.00 each additional 100,000 cu yd 200,000 or more cubic yards $528.00 for first 200,000 cu yd+ $15.00 for each additiona1200,000 cu yd GRADING PLAN REVIEW FEE: 50 cubic yards or less No Fee 51 to 100 cubic yards $12.00 101 to 1,000 $21.00 1,001 to 10,000 $27.00 10,001 to 100,000 $27.00 for first 100,000 cu yd+ $7.00 each additional 10,000 cu yd 100,001 to 200,000 $104.00 for first 100,000 cu yd+ $6.00 for each additional 100,000 cu yd 200,001 or more $166.00 Land Clearing Only(without earth being moved) $68.00 Paving Permit(greater than 5,000 sq. ft. —new paving only) $263.00 Resolutionl2-014 Amending Fee Schedule for 2013 Page 7 of 14 DRAFT MECHANICAL PERMIT: Plan review fees for mechanical permits will be collected at the time of application as noted in the "Fee Payment" section of this schedule. Permit fees will be collected when the permit is issued. If submitted as part of a building permit application, the unit costs are added, but not the "basic" fee for issuing the permit. Mechanical Permit Fees A. BASIC FEES 1. Basic fee for issuing each permit $37.00 2. Basic fee for each supplemental permit $8.00 B. UNIT FEES (in addition to the basic fee) 1. Installation or relocation of Furnaces and suspended heaters a. up to and including 100,000 btu $13.00 b. over 100,000 btu $16.00 2. Duct work system $11.00 3. Heat pump and air conditioner a. 0 to 3 tons $13.00 b. over 3 tons to 15 tons $21.00 c. over 15 tons to 30 tons $26.00 d. over 30 tons to 50 tons $37.00. e. over 50 tons $63.00 4. Gas water heater $11.00 5. Gas piping system $1.00 per outlet 6. Gas log, fireplace,and gas insert installation $11.00 7. Appliance vents installation; relocation; replacement $10.00 each 8. Boilers, compressors,and absorption systems a. 0 to 3 hp- 100,000 btu or less $13.00 b. over 3 to 15 hp- 100,001 to 500,000 btu $21.00 c. over 15 -30 hp-500,001 to 1,000,000 btu $26.00 d. over 30 ph- 1,000,001 to 1,750,000 btu $37.00 e. over 50 hp-over 1,750,000 btu $63.00 9. Air Handlers a. each unit up to 10,000 cfin, including ducts $13.00 b. each unit over 10,000 cfm $16.00 10. Evaporative Coolers (other than portable) $11.00 11. Ventilation and E�austs a. each fan connected to a single duct $11.00 b. each ventilation system $13.00 c. each hood served by mechanical e�aust $13.00 12. Incinerators a. residential installation or relocation $21.00 b. commercial installation or relocation $23.00 13. Unlisted appliances a. under 400,000 btu $52.00 b. 400,000 btu or over $105.00 14. Hood a. Type I $52.00 b. Type II $11.00 15. LP Storage Tank $11.00 16.Wood or Pellet Stove insert $11.00 17.Wood stove system-free standing $26.00 Resolutionl2-014 Amending Fee Schedule for 2013 Page 8 of 14 DRAFT PLUMBING PERMIT: Plan review fees for mechanical permits will be collected at the time of application as noted in the "Fee Payment" section of this schedule. Permit fees will be collected when the permit is issued. If submitted as part of a building permit application, the unit costs are added, but not the "basic" fee for issuing the permit. A. BASIC FEES 1. Basic fee for issuing each permit $37.00 2. Basic fee for each supplemental permit $8.00 B. UNIT FEES (in addition to the basic fee) 1. Each plumbing fi�ture on a trap $6.00 each (includes garbage disposals, dishwashers, backflow device, drainage, hot tubs, built-in water softener, water closets,lavatories, sinks, drains, etc.) 2.Water Heater $6.00 each 3. Industrial waste pretreatment interceptor $16.00 (includes its trap and vent, except kitchen type grease interceptors functioning as fixture traps.) 4. Repair or alteration of water piping, drainage or vent piping $6.00 each fi�ture 5. Atmospheric type vacuum breaker $6.00 each 6. Backflow protective device other than atmospheric type vacuum breakers $6.00 each 7. Medical gas $6.00 per outlet 8. Interceptors $6.00 each RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT: A traffic plan and traffic plan review is required if more than 50%of the width of any street is closed or if a single arterial lane is closed. A minimum plan review fee of $61.00 (hourly rate for city employees) applies to all right-of-way permits that require a traffic plan. If additional staff time is required, it will be charged at the hourly rate. Cate�orv 1.Non-cut obstruction without clean up $73.00 2.Non-cut obstruction with clean up $110.00 3. Pavement cut obstruction,non-winter $168.00 4. Pavement cut obstruction,winter $210.00 5. Approach Permit $52.00 SIGN PERMIT: Sign permits are subject to assessment of planning division review fees as found in Schedule A. Sign Permits are also subject to the assessment of the WSBCC fee as noted in Schedule B "General" section. Signs mounted on buildings $48.00 per sign(flat fee) Sign and pole mounting $68.00 per sign (flat fee) Resolutionl2-014 Amending Fee Schedule for 2013 Page 9 of 14 DRAFT Schedule C -Parks and Recreation ADMINISTRATIVE FEES Basic fees to be considered when applying rates Administrative Fee $32.00 Refuse Fee $52.00 AQUATICS Pool admission(age 5 and under) free Pool admission(age olderthan 5) $1.00 Pool punch pass(25 swims) $20.00 Weekend family discount- 1 child under 13 free with paying adult Swimming Lessons $35.00 Swim Team Fee $45.00 Reservation(less than 50 people) $105.00 per hour** Food fee (less than 50 people,if applicable) $25.00 Reservation(50-100 people) $131.00 per hour** Food fee (50-100 people,if applicable) $52.00 Reservation(101-150 people) $157.00 per hour** Food fee (101-150 people,if applicable) $79.00 **Minimum 2 hours ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE PERMIT $10.00 CENTERPLACE Conference Center Wing Auditorium $79.00 per hour Auditorium $475.00 per day Auditorium $236.00 per half day Auditorium w/Presentation System $52.00 per hour*** Auditorium w/Presentation System $315.00 per day*** Auditorium w/Presentation System $158.00 per half day*** Auditorium Deposit $52.00 Executive Conference Room $52.00 per hour Executive Conference Room Deposit $52.00 Meeting Room (day and evening use) $42.00 per hour Meeting Room $263.00 per day Large Meeting Room $75.00 per hour Large Meeting Room $225.00 per half day Large Meeting Room $450.00 per 9 hr. day Meeting Room $131.00 per half day Meeting Room Deposit $52.00 Patio Event Package $500.00 per event Portable Sound System $150.00 per event Platinum Package $500.00 per event Resolutionl2-014 Amending Fee Schedule for 2013 Page 10 of 14 DRAFT ***Requires rental ofpresentation system, see nextpage Great Room Kitchen with dining room rental $105.00 per use Kitchen Commercial use (2 hour minimum) $52.00 per hour Kitchen deposit 452.00 Multi-use/Banquet Hall $105.00 per hour Multi-use/Banquet Hall $840.00 per 9 hr session Multi-use/Banquet Hall $1,575.00 all day(6 a.m.-1 a.m.) Small Dining Area $52.00 per hour Deposit $210.00 Stage $21.00 per section per day Stage Removal $150.00 Table Settings (linens and tableware) $3.00 per place setting Pipe &Drape rental $100/day Chair Cover rental $3/chair per day Senior Center Wing Lounge with Dance Floor $105.00 per hour Lounge with Dance Floor $850.00 per 6 hours Lounge deposit $210.00 Meeting room(evening use) $42.00 per hour Meeting room(evening use) $131.00 per 4 hr session Meeting room(weekend use) $262.00 per day Meeting room(weekend use) $131.00 per half day Meeting room deposit $52.00 Private Dining Room $52.00 per hour Private dining room deposit $52.00 Wellness Center $105.00 per hour Miscellaneous Cleanup fee $52 to $315.00 per event Host/Hostess (after hours) $16.00 per hour Presentation System *** $262.00 per day (includes projector,podium, DVD/VCR sound system, camera system) Room Setup $26.00 per hour Satellite Video Conferencing $262.00 per hour Sound System $42.00 per day Technical Support $42.00 per hour Television/VCR $79.00 per day Touch Pad Voting System $121.00 base station per day+ $16.00 per keypad per day per hour LCD Projector $25.00 per hour LCD Projector $100.00 per day Coffee Service $25.00 service Linens Only $5.00 per table Wine glass only rental $.50 per glass Children's Birthday Package $175.00 per package Resolutionl2-014 Amending Fee Schedule for 2013 Page 11 of 14 DRAFT Business Incentive Rental Policy — The Parks & Recreation Director has the authority to reduce the room rental rate by 1 hr. when the rental meets the following criteria: minimum of 25 participants; utilize a classroom at CenterPlace 8 or more times per calendar year; and use in-house caterer for a meal each reservation. PICNIC SHELTER RESERVATION (For groups fewer than 200 people) Browns (up to five hours) $50.00 Edgecliff(uptto five hours) $50.00 Discovery Playground#1 (up to two hours) $35.00 Discovery Playground#2 (up to two hours) $35.00 Greenacres—large (up to five hours) $84.00 Mirabeau Meadows—shelter and stage (up to five hours) $84.00 Mirabeau Springs—shelter and dock(up to two hours) $250.00 Sullivan(up to five hours) $50.00 Terrace View(up to five hours) $84.00 Valley Mission(up to five hours) $84.00 EVENT RESERVATION—include shelter (For groups of 200 or more people) Events include but are not limited to activities such as car shows, tournaments, or high-risk activities. The Parks and Recreation Director will make the final determination. General fee (up to five hours): $157.00 Non-profit applications with proof of 501(c)(3)fee (up to five hours): $84.00 VALLEY MISSION HORSE ARENA Rental is for Fri-Sun $105.00 per weekend EVENT PHOTOS Mirabeau Springs shelter and dock $150.00 per hour BALL FIELD RENTAL/USE $26.00 lst hour+ $15.00 each additional hour REFUNDABLE DAMAGE DEPOSIT Fewer than 200 people $52.00 200 or more people $257.00 SPECIAL EVENTS: (See Spokane Valley Municipal Code 5.15) Application Fee $5.00 PROFESSIONAL PHOTOGRAPHY—Permit fee $26.00 annual RECREATION Recreation program fees are set to recover costs as specified in the Parks and Recreation revenue policy. Resolutionl2-014 Amending Fee Schedule for 2013 Page 12 of 14 DRAFT Schedule D — Administration COPY FEE: Copy of audio tapes,video tapes, DVD, CD's, etc. At Cost Copy of written documents in excess of 6 pages $.15 per page Copy large format documents (24"x 36"or greater) $3.00 per page Hourly rate to transfer scanned records to electronic disc $19.00 per hour A deposit of 10%may be required on public record requests NSF Check return fee $26.00 Schedule E — Other Fees BUSINESS REGISTRATION Business Registration $13.00 annual Nonprofit Registration $3.00 annual Late Business Registration Fee: (charged in addition to the business registration fee) (SVMC 5.05.050) Failure to pay the registration fee by the applicable date shall result in a late fee of 50% of the annual registration fee. Failure to pay the annual fee may result in non-issuance of a Washington State license, as determined by the Washington State Department of Licensing. Adult Entertainment Establishment License, Live Adult Entertainment $1,575.00 Establishment License,Adult Arcade $1,575.00 AdultArcade Device License $157.00 Manager License $157.00 Entertainer License $157.00 Late Adult Entertainment License Fee: (charged in addition to the license fee) 7 to 30 calendar days past due 25%of license fee 31 to 60 calendar days past due 50%of license fee 61 and more calendar days past due 75%of license fee Appeal of Administrative Determination—Adult Entertainment License: Adult Entertainment License denial, suspension or revocation pursuant to SVMC 5.10 $1,050.00 TOW OPERATOR REGISTRATION FEE $105.00 annual OVERSIZED LOAD PERMIT FEE $26.00 STORMWATER UTILITY CHARGE ON DEVELOPED PARCELS: Each single-family unit $21.00 annual All other properties each $21.00 per 3,160 sq. ft impervious surface Resolutionl2-014 Amending Fee Schedule for 2013 Page 13 of 14 DRAFT Schedule F — Police Fees Alarm svstem registration Residential alarm systems $25.00 annual Commercial alarm systems $35.00 annual [If the alarm site has no false alarms during the registration year,the following year's registration fee will be reduced to $15.00 per year for residential,and$25.00 per year for commercial.] Discounted alarm re�istration fees The annual registration fees and false alarm cost recovery fees are reduced by 50% for eligible citizens. To qualify for the fee reduction, an eligible person a. has a gross annual income of less than$19,100 for a one-person household or b. has a gross annual income of less than $21,850 for households of two or more persons or c. is substantially disabled, meaning that the person has a physical or mental impairment which substantially limits one or more major life activities or functions, such as caring for oneself, performing manual tasks such as walking, seeing,hearing, speaking,breathing and learning. Appeal regarding a false alarm $25.00 Service fees for resnonse to a false alarm: Residential false alarm incident $85.00 per incident Commercial false alarm incident $165.00 per incident Resolutionl2-014 Amending Fee Schedule for 2013 Page 14 of 14 �C l'I 1'iM' �� From the Community Development Departme�t '�alley � _ _ _ _ � � Interoffi�� M�mar�.ndum To: Mike Jackson} City Manager, MayorlCity Council�nemhers From; John Hohtr�an,PE, C�'M Com�ntmity Development Du•ector CC: Mark Calhoun,Finanee Date: October 11,2011 Ite: Pl�nning fee comparison Please fit�d �tt�c3�ed a sheet �vhich coi�pares severa[ common plann�ng divisian feas cl�arged by the City af Spokane Vailey,fhe Ciry of Spokane and Spoka��e Cot�nty. ❑ 'y'he City of Spokane Valley fees shawn in the fee schedule comparison include the revietiv fees for bo�h the Plamiing Division and the Develapment Enginee�ing Division. ❑ Fees far platting processes, zoning ci�anges (rezone), Comprehensive Plan at�tei�dmeriks, Conditional Use and Temporary Usa p�rmits, Flaoc��lain pertnits, Shorel'ule pertnits, Sti�eet Vacations, are �lifftcu[t ka campai�e due to ttie fact Spflkane County and the City of Spo�C��e have fees and charges for ot��er departrnents involved in the process. ❑ Pei°lot fees chat•ged for platting vaiy beriveetl the otlZer jurisdictions ❑ Gity of Spokane Vallay credits pre-application meeting feas to the cost of the application if applied foi��vithin one year of the pre-app meeti�ig, other jurisdiction nates a credit is allo�ved for this fee,whicll is approximately t�vice as mucl�as �pokane Valley. L Spokane Cal�nty Engineers charg� an hourly rate for review in additian to the base pergnit fee. The Spokane County Engineers review fee ranges fiom $�l0 to $60 per hour. ❑ �he examples dernonstrate the fees ct�a�•ged bv the City of Spokane Valley are considerably iower when compared to Spakane County and Ci�y o�S�okane fees. � The fees chaz•ged by the City o�'�pokane have not been raisec� since 2008, buk it is out� ur�derstanding they are considering a fee increase. Sample Schedule B Building Plan Review and Perrr�it Fees* Fee Type Spokane Spokane Caunty Spakane Valley Residential(does not include plum6ing or mechanica[) Processing fee:$25 Processing fee:$128 New-2000 sf living space(does not include garage) Plan review:$472 Plan review:$83 Plan review:$626 Permit:$1,482 Permit:$864** Permit:$1,565 Total:$1,479 Total:$1,075 Total:$Z,191 Addition-600 sf living space Processing fee:$25 Processing fe2:$221 Plan review:$25 Flan review: Plan review:$288 PermiL:$699 Permit:$46Q Permit:$721 Total:$749 ToYal:$581 Total:$1,009 Wood framed garage-660 sf Processing fee:$25 Processing fee:$�79 Plan review:$25 Plan review: Plan review:$84 Permit:$359 Permit:$230 Permit:$209 Total:$409 Total:$409 Total:$293 Commercial(does not include plumbing or mechanicaly Small storage building w/office Processing fee:$25 Processing fee:$498 Construction type:VB Plan review:$765 Plan review:$2,003** Plan review:$708 Occupancy Classifications: 51: 2000 sf Permit:$2,177 Permit:$1,756** Permit:$1,089 B: 375 sf Total:$1,967 TotaL•$4,257 Total:$1,797 Large storage building w/office Processing fee:$25 Processing fee:$498 Construc€ion type:VB Plan review:$11,357 Plan review�$12,216 Plan review:$9,688 Occupancy Classifications: 51: 100,000 sf Permit:$17,473 Permit:$18,3b9 Permit:$14,904 B_ 1,Sd0 sf Total:$28,855 Total:$31,083 Tptal:$24,592 Qffice building Processing fee;$25 Processing fee:$498 Construction type:VB Plan review;$3,403 Plan review:$1,213** Plan review:$3,826 Occupancy Classifications: B:10,000 sf Permit:$5,236 Permit:$2,500 Permit:$5,886 Total:$8,664 Total:$4,211 Total:$9,712 Site Grading(450 cu) Processing fee:$25 Processing fee:$498 Plan review:$25 Plan review: Plan review:$21 Permit:$76 Permit:$74 Permit:$47 Total:$126 Total:$572 Total:$68 * These fees are for the purpose of comparison only. Fees included are only the building plan review and building permit fee from Schedule B based on the project description. The total does not inelude trade permits,planning,development engineering,or fre department fees. The total generally does not represent total permit costs for the described project. ** Minimum fee Plan Review Turnarvund Times* As of September 2Q11 Review type 5pakane Spokane County 5pokane Valley Residential Not tracked 5 working days**(inspertor review) 3 working days'`* Average is 11 calendar days to **frequently issued within 2-3 working days **frequently issued within 3 working days issuance(new only)** **certain applications are same day Commercial lVot tracked 15 working days 10 working days New/Additions:Average is 57 calendar days to issuance Remodels/Tls:Average is 27 calendar days to issuance *Plan review time is the time to first comments if corrections are required. Plans that do not require additional information or correction could be issued within the designated time frame. These time frames are work load sensitive and can fluctuate throughout the year. Development Review & Perrnits Fees Comparison PLAT ADMIIVISTRATFON S}�ok�ne Valley Spoka�ie Cou�1ty Crty af Spokane ShorkPlat(Assurne 4 lots)(1) �2,079.00-$?,329AQ �a6,153 �7,125 Short Plat(Assume 91ois}(1) �2,894.OQ-$3,144.00 �6,d53 �7,725 Long Plat(Assume 2D lots}(1) �4,679.00-$4,929.Od $10,252 �9,815 Bi�ading Site P1an(Assume�3 fots}(1) 52,529.OQ-$2,779,OQ $6,649 $8,280 Change af Ca�ditions for Short Plats �278 $2,$38 SO%of plat fee Chai�ge of Canditions for La�tg Plats $682 $2;83 8 80%of plat fee Change of Candit�ons for�iaiding Site Plans $656 $�4,203 SO%of plat fee �a89 minimum-�$$3/hr-�leg�l pubfication fees+�3pp SEPA revie�v and comment $35a engineering revie�v �250 E:ctension of Time �8Q �670 .�'b500.0{� I yr/$�k.190 for 5}rr (1)City of 5poicane Valley Pre-app�ication fee deducted fi�om land zone applicatio�i fee if application is f[led�3�ithin 1 year of preapplication meeting,there is no mention fi�om Spokane Coun�y�and Spo4cane Cih�of a lyir�g the pre-app fee ta the application. Z�NE �I3MII�iISTRATIC7N Spokane Valley Spokane County Gity af Spok�ne zone Reelassi�cation(1)(2) $1;650 �a14,988 �4,590 Co�npre�tensi��e Plan Amendntent(3) �1,500 �a9,205 �5,000 Variance �I,575 �a5,405 $4,59� Coriditianal Use �8�0 ��,6fl4 ��1,590 Temporary Use �157 �a1,220 $575 Home Oecupation �84 �3Q6 �a650 Accessor��D�veiling Unit �84 �346 �65fl (1}Spa�Cane Caunty Zone reclassificatian also has an inerement fee of�2/acre rural anc€$SOlaere tirban (2}City of Spokane has a 116.Q4 per acre charge for rezone (3}Cityof 5pok�ne charges�,1,Q75 per 14 acre inerement for Cpmp Plan amendments Cammercial Bt�ilding Permit Revie�� Spol:atae V�lle�� S�o�C�ne County Ciry of Spokane Pre-Application Meeting �250 $517 $75f� Ne�v Single Fa��ily Reviesv $100 N/A N/A 5ite Plait Rev�etiv $550 �ab93 +Sg'7.4b per hour �285 Other�'ez•xni� F"ees Spa��na V�lley Sp�okane Co�int�� City a#�Spokane ApproacE�Permit $52 �a125 �30 Comm.l�a20 Aesidential Shorelines Pet�nit 5$44 $3,968 $4,575 Floodplain Pe�-mit(Kno�vn Elevation) $315—�52/lot �140 $1,20D Floodplain Perrnit�vith Site Visit �315—�52/1ot �235 N/A Floodplaiii Permit�vitl�SEPA NfA Ioi/A $1,335 �2,142.76+actual engineeeing VacationlLimited Access �1,365 costs $65{3 �cn 5•c�1,- ��11�.n� ` Parks and Recreation Department all �TE 2426 K. Discovery Place � Spokane Valley, WA 99216 �� 509.b88,0340 9 Fax: 509.688,0188 4 parksandrecGspokanevalley,org Memar�andum To: City Cour�cil Mernbers; Mike Jackson, City Manager From: Miehael D, Stone, CPRP, Director of Parks and Recreatio� Date: october 18, 2o�.i Re: Park & Recreation Fe2 Comparison Attached to this rnem� is a comparison of par� & recreatian fees from the City of Spakane, Spokane County and t�he City of Spokane Valley. CenterPlac�, with the majority of au� feesf is unique to �ot�h the City and Caunty and therefore there are r�ally not any comparisons. The �ee comparison focuses an park reserva�ions, aquat�c fees and field rentals. The attack�ment has trie� ta gro�up similar fees b�tween the three agencies. The bottom [i�e for the City of S;�okane Valley is t'�at aur fees ar� e�r�mely competit�ve and in a majority of cases 1ess tha�► both 'the Ci�y af Spokan� and Spokane Coun�y. �f yau have questions ar need add9tio�al Enformation, p{ease let m� kr�ow, Thank yo�, 1 CEty of5pakane Valley parks and Rerreattan CPty of Spakane Parks aR�f Retreattan Spokane Couryty pat�a 'R�ftEdtaar� Picnl<Shelter FeES Picnic Shelker Fees[max4hrs er reservation} Shelter Retes Browns/Edgecllff/Sullivan Parks $50: less than 50 people l'+be Lake 550 for 5 hours $100: 51-100 peopTe $65 for wzek days Mirabeau MeadowS/Valley Mi�3ion $154: 101•200 people 5100 For weakends $84 for 5 hours $2p0: 3pi-3p0 eo le $50 depasit Miraheau Springs Additlonal ShekerFees $250AIcohol Sewr� $250 $2S0 fpr 2 hours $25: Special Event application,groups over 5D $150 for one hour Event Photos $�5: �ee for unusual structures�dunk tank,etc} Valley Mission Horse Arena $50: Char e if our event is tatered 51p51ortheweekend Weddin atPlcnfcShelters $52 refunda6le dama e de osit for all of tine above $50 s4artin at additionai fee tor ark icnic shelters E�enk Fees for rou s over 200 ea !e or with hi h risk activlties Lar e Grou s or 5 etial Events Cam Caro Rates $157 $50 nomrefundatle application fee if over 2p0 peopl� $�00 far a famlly fundion with a$20(1 deposit $84 for non-profit $25 fee per 300 people at the event $SSfl for an adult non-proft group with a$154 depostt $52 refundable dama;e deposlt for under 20�people $25 fee For unusual structures $75 for a outh nom rofit rou with at$75 de asit $257 refunda�ie damage de osit for over 200 eo le S50 Fee for a catered event $254 depoist for 2C 1 or more people $50 de osit for 20C ar less eo le Weddings In Parks $250 FlnchArboretum $304 for flo�ting Staga $175farCanadalsl�nd $175 for the Forestry Shelker $175 for Northbank Shelter $354 for LooK Carrousel ,$�00 for Coeur d'FJene Park $306 for Maniio Perk Ballfield User Fees Merkel 5 or#s Field User FtEs $Z6 first Hour Grass Pields $15 each additional hour $30 forAdults perhour 552reFundabledama�eda osit $20forYouth erhaur Turf Fields $65 for adultswlth lights $�5 for aduSts without IIgMs $55 far youih with Ilghts $45 for auih wlthout li hts Softball/9a5Ebdll Fi21ds $26.25 Adults per game with Ilghts $18.75 Aduit per game without lights $�2.50 Youkh per game with 1lghts $15 outh er arrewithoutll hts Franklin Park 5oftha1l/Base6all Field Faes Adult Sokball$22 per game with 1Eghts Adult 5oftball$18.50 per game without lights Youth Sokball$18.50 per game with 1lghts Youth Sokball$11 er ame vrithout li hts A uakics User Fees A ua#its User(ees A uatics User Fees 0 en5wim 0 enSwim 0 en5wim Children 5 and under FREE 03yrs.FRE€ 2 yrs and under FAEE $1 er o en swim $��aily Admission Vouth 4•llyrs. 3�Syrs.$2 $4 Pail Admissian Adult 1fl-54 rs. 6 and older$4 Seasan Passes Season Passes Season Passes $20 for a 25 swim ass $49.95 You[h 4-17yrs.Season Pass $40 Discounted Punch Pass $99.95 Rdult Seasfln Pass $183.95 Famil Season Pass $30 Swlm Lessons 5�8 Sw3m Lessons 535 Swim Lessons $35 Swim Team $75 Sw3m Team 5��Swlm 7eam CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 11, 2012 Department Director Approval: 0 Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business Q new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Allocation of Lodging Tax Funds. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: State Law PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Thus far in 2012, the Council has discussed lodging tax on four separate occasions: • An August 28th Admin Report that provided an overview of the 2013 grant application and award process. This report included attachments pertaining to Tourism Promotion Area (TPA) revenues and lodging taxes generated by jurisdiction for the years 2009 through 2011. • A September 18th Admin Report that followed up on two questions from the Council's August 28`h meeting: o Would expending lodging tax proceeds on "way-finding signs" be an appropriate use? (answer was yes, presuming the signs specifically directed visitors to tourist facilities), and o Would using lodging tax proceeds to contract with a vendor / agency to develop a festival for Spokane Valley be an appropriate use of the money? (answer was "perhaps" but because this is an unsettled question staff recommended against). • A September 25th Admin Report that discussed setting aside a portion of the lodging tax for City directed marketing efforts. At the conclusion of the discussion Council by consensus decided to set aside or earmark $80,000 of 2013 lodging tax proceeds with $30,000 being used to offset CenterPlace advertising costs, and $50,000 to be used for yet to be determined City marketing efforts. • A November 13, 2012 Administrative Report that communicated the results of the October 17, 2012, Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC) meeting. BACKGROUND: In 2003 the City implemented a 2% hotel/motel tax, the proceeds of which are used to promote conventions and tourist travel to our City. The organizations to which the tax proceeds are distributed are ultimately determined by the City Council which receives a nonbinding recommendation from the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee. The Advisory Committee is comprised of five members who are appointed by the City Council and the Committee membership must include: • At least two representatives of businesses that are required to collect the tax, • At least two people who are involved in activities that are authorized to be funded by the tax, and • One elected city official who serves as chairperson of the Committee The Advisory Committee makes its recommendations based upon a combination of written application materials and a presentation that is made to them by each applicant. On October 17, 2012, the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee met to consider application materials and presentations from applicants for a portion of the City's 2% hotel/motel tax Page 1 of 3 receipts which are estimated to be $460,000 in 2013. Presentations were made by the HUB, Spokane County Fair & Expo Center, Spokane Regional Sports Commission, Spokane Valley Heritage Museum, Valleyfest and Visit Spokane. Following applicant presentations, the Committee discussed both the merits of making particular awards to various applicants and how they felt revenues should be allocated. Ultimately, the majority of the Committee recommended that 2013 awards be made in two tiers: • The first tier being the $380,500 that remained after the City Council's 9/25/2012 earmarking of$80,000 for City directed purposes, and • The second tier reflecting the Committee's opinion of how the $80,000 should be expended. The Committee recommended the following awards be advanced to the City Council for consideration: Recommended Awards Amount Brenda Doug Peggy Lee Jeff A licant Re uested Grassel Kelle Doerin Cameron Fiman A�,era e HUB Sports Center 50,000 10,500 20,000 25,000 20,000 30,000 21,100 Spokane County Fair& Expo Center 30,000 14,000 20,000 15,000 20,000 20,000 17,800 Spokane Regional Sports Commission 200,000 150,000 150,000 120,500 165,250 165,250 150,200 Spokane Valley Heritage Museum 12,000 2,000 0 5,000 0 0 1,400 Valleyfest 50,000 6,000 0 20,000 0 0 5,200 Visit Spokane(Spokane Regional CVB) 350,000 198,000 190,500 195,000 175,250 165,250 184,800 692,000 380,500 380,500 380,500 380,500 380,500 380,500 LTAC Suqgested Reallocation of$80.000 Earmarked by City Council on 9/25/2012 -Visit Spokane(staffing of State-line visitor center) 30,000 30,000 0 30,000 30,000 24,000 -De�lopment of mobile application 20,000 20,000 0 20,000 20,000 16,000 -CenterPlace 10,000 10,000 0 10,000 10,000 8,000 -H UB 10,000 10,000 0 10,000 10,000 8,000 -Fair&Expo 10,000 10,000 0 10,000 10,000 8,000 80,000 80,000 0 80,000 80,000 64,000 460,500 460,500 380,500 460,500 460,500 444,500 Noteworthy here is that some organizations partake of both the Outside Agency and Lodging Tax funding processes. At the conclusion of the 2013 Outside Agency funding process on September 25, 2012, the Council awarded the following amounts to agencies that have also applied for lodging tax proceeds: • $5,429 to the HUB • $19,368 to Valleyfest • $1,429 to the Museum UPDATE ON 2012 REVENUES: The 2012 Budget was adopted with estimated revenues of $430,000 but with receipts of $420,000 through October 2012 it appears actual receipts will be closer to $480,000, or $50,000 greater than anticipated. Assuming the Council is agreeable to a subsequent 2013 Budget amendment it would be possible to award this extra $50,000 at this time. The Council could also decide to hold this money and award it as part of the 2014 award process that will take place in the fall of 2013. OPTIONS: The recommendations of the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee are advisory in nature and nonbinding to the Council. The City Council may accept the recommendations in whole or in part. Page 2 of 3 RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: 1 move to make the following allocations of Lodging Tax Funds for calendar year 2013: BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The 2013 Budget currently includes an appropriation of $460,500 of hotel/motel tax monies from Fund #105 including $30,000 for CenterPlace advertising, $50,000 for City directed marketing efforts and $380,500 for distribution to applicants. If the Council is agreeable to a future budget amendment we can at this time award another $50,000 for a total of $510,500 in 2013. The Council could also decide to hold this money and award it as part of the 2014 award process that will take place in the fall of 2013. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun ATTACHMENTS: • Fund #105 — Hotel/Motel Tax— history of revenues and expenditures—2008 through 2013. • Chart reflecting monthly history of Spokane Valley hotel/motel tax receipts from May 2003 through October 2012. • Fund #105 — Hotel/Motel Tax —Analysis reflecting revision of 2012 estimated revenues and potential impact on 2013. • Minutes of October 17, 2012, Lodging Tax Advisory Committee meeting. • Attachment from the Admin Report presented at the September 25, 2012 Council meeting which displayed "2013 In-House Tourism Promotion options". • Tourism Promotion Area (TPA) revenues received by Zone for the years 2009 through 2011. • Spokane County TPA and hotel/motel tax distributions for the years 2009 through 2011. • Summary of TPA Fee and 2% Hotel/Motel Tax Collections for the years 2009 through 2011. Page 3 of 3 \\SV-F52\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2013\1f15 Rev and exp CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 10l11/2012 Fund#105-Hotel/Motel Taz Fund Revenues,Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Actualfor2008through 20i7 - 2012 and 2013 Budgets 2012 Budget Actual As Adoptad As Amended 2013 2008 2009 2010 2011 11/15/201� 10/30/2012 Budget Revenues Hotel/Motel Tax 467,089 423,978 448,544 457,603 430,000 430,000 460,000 Investment interest 10,280 1,892 1,�98 454 700 700 500 5ubtotal revenues 477,369 425,870 449,562 458,057 430,700 430,700 460,500 Expenditures InterFund Transfers-#001 CenterPlace 84,550 86,963 37,500 0 30,000 3�,OOfl 30,000 City directed marKeting efforts 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 l`ourism Promotion 525,029 375,202 362,302 472,481 400,700 540,200 380,500 Subtotal expenditures 609,57� 462,165 399,802 472,481 430,700 , 570,200 460,500 Revenues over(under)expenditures (132,202) (36,295) 49,760 (14,424) 0 (139,500) 0 Beginning fund balance 391,093 258,891 222,596 272,356 257,932 257,932 �18,432 Ending fund balance 258,89'I 222,596 272,356 257,932 ^� I 118,432 � I � 2012 Awards Recipient Round 1 Round 2 '�"Total HUB 42,600 0 42,600 Sports Commission 185,000 0 185,000 Museum 3,900 1,100 5,000 CenterPlace 30,000 0 30,000 Valleyfest 0 30,000 30,000 CVB 0 251,720 251,720 Fair&Expo 0 25,900 25,900 Tota1 appropriation 261,500 308,720 570,220 Z012 08 28 RCA HSV-FS21Userslmealhoun\Tax RevenuelLodging Tax12 01 211 0 5 hotel motel tax CIiY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 11/30/2012 HofellMotel Tax Receipts through� October Actual for tNe years 2003 Chrough 2072 � �6 2012 to 2011 Difference 2003 200a 2005 2606 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 $ % January O.Op 16,993.58 20,691.03 20,653.49 25,137.92 28,946.96 23,280.21 22,706.96 22,21221 21,442.32 (770) (3.47%) February 0.00 18,161.04 19,976.Si 29,9a6,49 25,3�0.66 2a,623.06 23,283.95 23,4�6.94 22,792.14 21,548.82 (1,243} (S.a6%) March 0.00 18,182.01 22,828.i5 24,308.48 29,190.35 27,509.99 25,272.02 24,232.35 24,611.28 25.654.64 1,043 424% April O.DO 26,897.82 29,748A� 34,371.82 37,950.53 40,406.02 36,253.63 39,463.48 38,230.49 52,130.37 13,900 36.36% May 17,527.32 16,440.37 29,017.66 32,522.06 31,371.01 36,$28.53 32,5$8.8� 34,683.32 33,790.69 37,478.44 3.688 10.91% June 32,512.19 53,284.01 35,330.35 34,256.71 36.267.07 46,659.8$ 40,414.59 39,935.36 41,403.41 43,970.70 2,567 6.20f July 38,550.48 42,12026 43,841.82 49,7A4.62 56.281.99 50,421.3� 43,95026 47,385.1$ 49.311.97 52,818.60 3,507 7.91% August 54,97474 43,649.84 46,852.�0 45,916.16 51,12070 50,818.35 50,14fi_56 54,922.99 57,451.68 57,22923 (222) (0.39%) September 30,71823 39,390.66 46,746.18 50,126.53 57,260.34 60,711.89 50,817.62 59,418.96 58,908.16 64,29870 5,391 9.�5% October 36,960.11 33,004.62 34,966.85 38,674.17 43,96974 38,290.46 36,78d.38 41,272.35 39,028.OS 43,698.90 4,671 11.97% Collected to tlate 205,272.99 308,12421 329,999.36 351,520.13 393,860.31 405,216.51 362,792.00 387,437.90 387,740.11 420,270.72 32,531 8.39% November 23,044.56 32,176.61 26,089.36 36,a17.11 36,340.64 35,582.59 3a,05479 34,329.78 37,339.36 0.00 December 28,825.30 23,142.70 31,740.18 29,147.1@ 31,377.41 2&,290.11 27,131.43 26,776.84 32,523.19 0.00 Total Collections 257,142.85 363,443.52 387,828.90 417,084.39 461,578.36 467,089.21 423,978.22 448,544.52 457,602.66 420,27072 , ��;UU� w��-(,;'„�� Budget Estimate 419,900.00 380,000.00 436,827.00 350,000.00 400,OD�.00 400,000.00 512,000.00 380,000.00 480,000.00 430,000.00 Actual over(under)budg (161,857.15) {16,556.48) (48,998.10) 67,084.39 61,578.36 67,08921 (88,021.78) 68,544.52 (22,397.34) (9,72928) Total actual collections as a%of lotal budget 61.37% 95.64% 8878% 179.17% 115.39% 116.77% 82.81% 118.Q4% 95.33% Na %change in annual total collected n/a 41.34% 6.71% 7.54% 10.67% 1.19% (923%) 5.79% 2.02% n/a %of budget collecled through October 48.99% 8�.09% 75.54°Ia 109.43% 98.47% 101.30°/n 70.86°l0 101.96% 80780� y��40� %of actual total collected thfpUgh OCY040r 79.83% 84J8% 85.09% 8d28% 85.33% 86J51 85.57% 86-38% 84.73% fl/8 Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of Ociober 450,000.0� 400,OOO.QO _ - - — -Oc[ober 350,000.0� September 300,000.00 — � `AugusY 250,000.00 li 'July -June 200,000.00 z May 150,000.00 � � � .—..�-'- ___ �.� ■April � _— � s March ioa,000.00 - ■Fe6ruary 50,000.00 ,_ , � e——� ��"� sJanuary 0.00 �.^—e1 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2D12 Page 21 \\SV-FS2\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2013\105 Rev and exp CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 12/3f2012 Fund#105-Hotel/Motel Tax Fund Revenues,Expenditures and Ghanges in Fund Balance 2072 and 2013 Budgets 2012 Budget 2013 B�dget as adopted as amended Projected as adopted future 2013 Nov 15,2011 Oct 30,2012 Actuals Oct 30,2012 amendment Revenues Hotel/Motel Tax 430,000 430,000 480,000 460,000 460,000 investment Interest 700 700 700 500 500 Subtotal revenues 430,700 430,700 480,700 460,500 460,500 Expenditures Interfund Transfers-#0�1 CenterPlace 30,�00 3�,000 30,000 30,000 30,Q00 City directed marketing efforts d 0 0 50,000 50,000 Tourism Promot9on 400,70Q 540,200 540,200 380,500 430,504 Subtotal expenditures 430,700 570,200 570,200 460,500 510,500 Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 (139,500) (89,500) 0 (50,000) Beginning fund balance 257,932 257,932 257,9 118 168,432 Ending fund balance 257,932 198,432�-1b'�432 �4�8,432 118,432 2012 12 11 IISV-FS2lLlsersUncalhounlBudgetsL20131Lodging Tax120'!2 10 77 minufes fo LTAC meetrng.docx CITI( QF SPOKANE VAILLEY, WA Loclging Tax AdvESOry� Committee Minutes of Meeting held Ocfober 17, 2412. 2013 Award Y�ar The meeting was called to order at 8;45 am and Fn atter�dance was; • Committee Memb�rs �feff Fiman (by canference call}, Peggy Doerin�, Doug Kelley, Lee Cameran and Commit#ee Chair-� Brenda Grassel. • City Staff camprised of Sarah �arr ar�c� Mark Calhoun. • Applicant presenters included: o Phil Champfin (HUB}, o Denise Pauling from Unlimited Marketing, Larry Davis and Stephanie Hughes {Vafleyfest), o ,�ayne Svngl�ton and Herman Meier (Spokan� Valfey Heritage Museum), o Cheryl Kilday and Jeanna Hofrneister (Spokane Regianal CVB —Visit Spokane), o Rich Hartzell and Erin Gurtel (S�okaroe County Fair ar�d Expo Center} o Eric Sawyer (Spokane Regional Sparks Commission) Mark Calhoun then addressed the Commitk�� and applicants on a number of issues including: • A reminder#�hat beginr�ing in 2007 a�d running through June 30, 20�3 the State Legislatr�re added mor� p�rmissi�e �anguage in regards to how �otellmatel tax could be used, The expansio� of uses inciuded financirtg af operations, but beginning ,�uly 1, 2{}�3 the tax can again only be us�d for marketing purposes. • A brief explanation related to #he fir�ancial information included in the Camm�tte�: packet. He noted that the 2013 Budget projects $460,5�0 wifl be available for distribukion in 20�3, and that the City Council, �t their September 25, 2012 meeting by consensus decided to set aside $80,a00 for City directed ac#ivities with the rerriaining $380,500 availabfe through fhis grant process. The $80,000 earmarked by tne City will be used for: o $30,400 to pa�tially offset CenterPlace advertising costs, and o $50,OQ0 for City directed marketing to raise Spokane V�alley's tourism pro#ile. • He currently anticipates an ending fund balance in Fund #105— HotellMotel Tax Fund of $118,432 which should �e adequate to co�er: o Cash flow resuiting from the one-mor�th delay between w�en tl�e tax ss collecte� by a hotel and �rvhen it is remitte� to the Ciky. o The uncertainty of w�hat actual r�v�nues might be. � The need for additional money shoul� an unex�ected appartunity arise during the year. The cammittee then discussed the Counci!'s decisian ta set money aside, Ms. Grass�l's recollection was khat City Coun�il members attended a conference in w�aich signage uvas brought up in discussion, and Council wanted to bring more p�opie off af the fre�way usi�ng signage. She state� sl�e suggested pos#poning putting that maney aside until the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee cauld be inform�d or consulte�. She though# one cour�ci�member agreed, but it was deeaded to set it aside. Diseusslon ensued regarding t�e understanding that a mobile appl4cation development is one passible use of the funds. The Cammittee consensus was that they #elk the Cify should ha�e to apply for and make presenta#iQns to �he Committee far hotellmatel tax proceeds including �oth Ce�terPlace advertisin� and other marketing effarts. Page 1 of 4 11SW-FS24CIser51mca1hounlBudgets12d1731Lodging Tax12012 �0 17 minutes to L7'AC meetirrg.docx A lica�# resentatians were then made: • 8:50 HUB Sports Center -Phsl Champlin • �:Ofl Spokane Re�ional S�arts Commission - �ric Sawyer • 9:20 Sqolcane Va�iey Herita�e Museum - Jayne Singl�ton and Herma� h�eier • 9:40 Uisit SpoEcane - Cheryl Kilday and Jear�na Hofineister • 10;25 Valle�st - Denise Pauling, Larry Davis, Stephanie Hug}��s o Change their request to $30,Q00 as �hey u�dersland they won't receive $5Q,000. • 11:25 S�akane County Fair and Expo Gen#er- Rich Hartzell and Erin Gurte� During appl�cant presen#ations the Committee asked questions ar�d discussed various points. C3ne particuiar paint Ms. Grassel as9�ed to be includ�d in �he meetir�g minutes is lhat C�ty of S�okan� lodging #ax has historically been allocated witta 50% going to Visi4 Spokar�e and 50% going to the Spakane PFD. Beginning th@s year however the allocation is as follows: • The first $100,000 c�ilecfed is granted out, and the ba�ance is allocated; � 5°fo - Sporks Commissian 0 55% -Vi�it Spokane � 45% - SpOk��le PFQ Following appficant presen�afions, deliberations ensued by Committee m�mb�rs and they discussed: � wh�th�r CenterPlace should be required to make a presentation • that ti�ey feel Valleyfesk is a c�mmunity event t�a# should be funded by the City but nok with rodging tax because th� return on investment to the Gity comes from increased sales fiaxes ratY�er t�an lodging taxes • whether they should reallocate the �8Q,000 set aside by the City Council ak their September 25, 2012 meeting. Ultirr�at�ly, the rrtajority of the Committee recommer�ded t�rak 2013 awa�`ds be made ia� two t�ers: • The first tier being the $380,�0� that rem�inad after the City Council's 912 512 0 1 2 earmarking of $8Q,Q00 for City directed purposes, and • The second fier reflecting the Committee's opinion af how the $80,QOQ should be expended. The Committee recammended the fallowing awards be advanced to th� Gity Councif far ca�►side�ation; Page 2 of 4 11SV-FS21UserslmcalhounlBudgets120131Lodging Tax12012 10 17 minutes fo LTAC meeting.docx CITY OF SFOKANE VALLEI',WA 9Q11712��2 2013 Lodging Tax Funding Requests and Awards Ftecommended by the Lodging Tax Advisc�ry Committee (LTAC) Fiecommended Awards Amount Brenda boug Peggy Lee Jeff Applicant Requested Grassei Kelley �]oenng Cameron Fiman A�.erage FiUB Sports Center 5D,000 10,500 20,000 25,Q0� 20,0{�f} 34,000 21,100 5pokane County Fair&Expo Center 30,000 14,pp0 20,OOf} 'i5,Q00 20,OOQ 2q000 17,600 Spokane F;eglonal 5porks Commission 2D0,000 150,000 'i50,aao 120,50Q i65,25� 165,250 1�£l,2170 Spakane Valley Heritage Museum 12,000 2,000 0 5,440 a 0 1,400 Valieyfest 50,000 6,000 Q 20,i}DCl 0 � 5,200 Visit Spokane(Spo'kane Regional CVB) 350,000 198,000 i9D,5Q0 195,000 175,250 165,250 184,800 &92,000 380,b00 380,50fl 380,500 380,500 38D,500 3�0,540 LTAG Suqqesked Reallocation of$80 0�0�armar�ed by City Council on 9l25i2012 -Visit Spokane(skaffing of Slate-lins usi4or center} 3Q400 30,000 0 30,000 30,000 24,000 -De�lopment of mobile application 2�,OOQ 20,000 0 20,000 20,OOQ 16,040 -Ce�terPiaCe 'i0,0�0 14,000 0 1Q,000 10,OOQ 8,006 -HUB 90,04C7 1Q,000 0 1�,OD0 �Q,Q00 8,ODfl -Fair& Expo 10,000 1�,000 0 10,000 1p,000 8,000 80,400 80,000 0 BD,OOQ BD,df}0 64,000 464,50p 4Sfl,50D 3$0,5�0 450,5Q0 4BD,54fl 444,500 Following the grant award process Ms. Grassel brought �p some ot'�er topics that were alfud�d to in applican# pr�s�ntations that she fe6t shoul� be brought up to the City Counc�L These included the City considering awarding multi-yea�-contracts and that the Revis�� Code af VVashington (RCVI� cafls out specific agencies that provide tourism promotion services. She affered to either bring #hese topics up with khe Council ar that the Cammittee can have a round #able d�scussion. Ms. Grassel then moved that the Gommittee pursue lovking at a multi-year con�ract with tourism agencies and the motion was seconded by Mr. Kelley. Committee discussion ensued and the motian was withdrawn by Ms. Grass�l. fVlr. Cameron commer�ted that he is concerroed with a multi-year contract and v+rondered how t�is would be done. He stated that he doesn't want to close th� �racess to other applic�nts and suggested perhaps taking a portion ofi funds that are relakive6y secure. He stated he would �e cau�ious to put the Committee in a position where they don't fuifill th� spirit of the legislation. Discussian amang the Camrriikte� and Cheryl f�ilday and �rie Sawyer ensued. Ms. Grassel wikhdrew her initial motion and then in a new motian moved that the Com�-nittee wauld IEke to have Visit Spokane and the Sports Commission rneet with the City Manager and Mayar ta discuss longer term cflntracts. Mr. Cameron seconded the motion and suggested getting a legal opinic�rt as to whether this was passible, He fur�her stafed that #he difficult part politically is t�at you have a lot of entities that come to table and that Council daesn't want to tell them no, and so th� Committee should consider having a baseline approach that keeps palitics out and l�oks at it as return on investment otherwise we won't have tax dallars. He also P�ge 3 of 4 t1SV-FS21UserslmcalhounlBudgets120931Lodging Tax12012 10 1T minutes to L7'AC meeling.docx sugges#ed the City provide $50,Q00 of economic developmenk funds for Valleyfest. After furt�er disc�ssion #he motion was brought to a vot� with all in favor. Ms. Kilday from Visit Spokane then addressed the Commiktee and nated that th� City of Spokane rece�tly increased their ladging tax rate by '6,73%. She stated fhey waufd lik� the City af S�okane Vafley Counci! to afso consid�r increasi�g their tax as well to egualize ki�e tax in the communities ar�d provide additional funding. Mr. Cameron stated tf�at hakeliers don't support an increase in the�ax just#o generate more mvney. He felt the City of Spokane Valley shoul� guard any additianal tax proceeds until the Sporks CommESSion cornpletes a facilities study. The Committee woul� lilce to com�e back an� discuss the topic of increasing th� lodging tax rate ��, the future. Meeting was a�jaurne� at approximately 1:30pm. Page � of 4 11SV-F521iJsers\mcalhounlBudgets120131Lodging Tax12Q12 09 25 RCA attachment-50k City directed marketing efforfs ATTACHMENT A 2013 In-House Tourism Promotion options Descri tion Non-recurri Recurrin varies widely depending on complexity and whether Development of smartphone Spokane Valley Tourism app $20,000.�0 consultant or in-house development Smartphone tourism app ennual fees $5,000.00 ongoing annual hosting&maintenance Reprint updated copies of Spokane Valley Passport` $4,200_00 estimated suppfy for 1 year,reprint as needed Mail distribution of passport to targeted VICs"" $150.00 new mailings as needed Develop and print Spokane Valley bicyclelattractions map* $1,85fl_00 estimated supply for 1 year;reprint as needed Mail distribution of bike/atfractions map to tar eted VICs'* $150.00 new mailings as needed Full page ad in Tourism Alliance WA State Tourism Guide $14,000.00 Full page ad in Visit Spokane Regional Visitors guide $3,700.00 Visit Spokane website banner ad(12 months-1/8 share) $3,600.00 Page sponsorship-Places to stay-(6 summer montE�s-�/2 share) $1,500.00 Total if all proposal implemented $49,150.00 $5,000.00 Note: About$64,035.70 in 2012 economic development funding is being spen#for a marketing consultantlad agency to develop short and long term strategies for marketing and promoting Spokane Valley for economic development and tourism,and will include some minimal adveRising development and placement prfor to the end of 2012 Funds have not been allocated in the 2013 budget for implementation of the recommendations. "These are provided to local hotels,the Visit Spokane VICs in downtown Spokane and at the airport,also *Targeted V1Cs are Visitor Information Centers located within about a day's drive of Spokane Valley,and from which we draw the largest percentage of our overnight visitors to this area �'15V-F52�lJsers\mcafhaun,�8udgets�2013�,105 Rev and exp CITY OF SP4FCANE VALLEY, WA 8�2012012 Analysis o#Spokane Cgunty Tourism Prvmo�ian Area (TPA) R�venues Collected in Zones A, B, C and D*'` For the years 2009 through 2011 2009 2010 �0'f� Tofia I City of Spokan� Valley Zone A 0.00 �.00 4.00 0.00 Zone B 356,854.00 493,270.Q0 473,�68.(l� 1,323,292.00 Zon� C D.OQ 0.00 O.OQ 0.00 Zone D 988.�0 7,Q77.0� 1,�66,50 9,231.50 357,842.OQ 500,347.40 474,334.50 1,332,523.50 Cit of� akane Zc�ne A 1,005,174.00 1,Q95,426.00 1,114,7�O.Q0 3,215,300,0a Zone B 261,561.50 335,73�.00 362,'[42.00 959,436.50 zone c o.00 o.00 o.oa a.oa Zone p 4,355.50 6,308.00 z,750.50 13,414.00 1,271,091,04 1,437,4fi6.00 1,479,592.5� 4,188,149.5a Spolcane County Z�one A 0.�0 0.00 O.Oa O,OQ Zone B 0.00 Q.00 0.00 O.Oa Zone C 348,382.�0 364,246.0� 361,754.00 '[,074,3$2.00 Zone D 1,652.00 'f,1'i6.50 0,00 2,768.50 350,034.0{} 365,362.50 36�,754.Q0 1,077,15Q.50 Totals Zone A 1,�05,174.�0 1,095,426,00 1,114,700.00 3,2�5,300.Q0 Zone B 618,4�5,�0 829,002.Q0 83b,310.0� 2,28�,727.50 Zvne C 348,382.00 364,24�.00 3�1,754.00 1,07Q�,382.001 Za�e D 6,995.5Q 14,501.50 3,9�7.00 25,4'f4.00 1,978,967.00 2,3Q3,�75.50 2,376,6$1.00 6,5'97,823.50 Zone A Hotels located in downtown S�o'kane w'ith lodging revenues � $500,000. Zane 8 Hotels focated in the cities of Spokane Valley and Spokane that are not located in cfowntown Spolcat�e with lodgf�g r�venues > $500,000. Zone C �lote{s located in unincorporated Spokane County t�at ara not Zone A or B, and have fodging revenues � $500,Q00. Zane D Hoteis located anywhere in the Spokane County 7PA with reaenues � $500,Q00 *�Per fhe Wa�shr`ngton Sfate Deparfinent of Revenue �PA rev 14SV-F52�Users�mcalhoun�Bud�et5O2�13�105 Rev arod exp S�OKANE COUNTY DISTRIBUTIONS** 911'�12012 Distrihutians for the years 2009 thraugh 2Q11 S okane Count Tourism Pramatian Area �PA �istributions 2009 2010 2�11 _ Total CVB - Visit Spakane 1,300,00� 1,664,187 1,657,500 4,62�,687 Spokane Regional Sparts Commissfon 325,000 467,257 460,p01 1,252,258 United Stakes Fig€�re S�Cating 1��,ODO 72,600 0 197,5Q0 1,750,�Q0 2,203,944 2,117,501 6,071,445 S okane Count Distribukions af Hate] 1 Matel Tax 2009 201� 2011 Total CV� - Visit Spokane 275,000 275,000 275,000 825,000 Spokane Regianal Sports Commission 75,000 75,000 66,000 216,000 350,000 350,000 341,000 1,041,�00 **Per the Spokane County 8udgef Ofiice S�ok Cnty dist \�SV-FSZ��Jsers�mcalhoun�Budgets�2013'�1d5 Rev and ex}� CI`�Y OF SP�KANE 1lALLEY, WA 8123120�2 Summary of i'PA Fee and HoteilMo#el Tax Collected For the years 2009 througM 209'i 2009 2p�0 2��1 Total Citv of Spakane Va11ey TPA 357,842 500,347 474,335 1,332,524 9 Hot�l 1 Motel Tax 423,978 4�8,544 457,603 1,330,125 2 T81,82D 948,891 931,938 2,662,�49 City of Spokar�e TPA 1,27�,Q9'1 �,437,4Cf� 1,�79,593 4,188,'i50 9 Hotel 1 Motel Tax 9,361,444 �,415,863 1,37�,827 4,149,134 .� 2,632,535 2,853,329 2,851,420 8,337,284 S okane Count TRA 35�,034 365,363 361,754 1,a77,151 1 Hot�l / Motel Tax 38'f,730 395,489 397,030 1,174,249 4 731,764 760,852 758�,784 2,251,400 1 -From Deparfinenf of Revenue 2- From City af Spokane Va!!ey 3-Fram Cify af Spokane CAFR-Fund#1590 4-From Spokane Cour�fy CAFR-Fund#926 CoSV TPA and 2% CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 11th, 2012 Department Director Approval: � Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business � new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. Report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Street and Stormwater Maintenance Contract Renewal — Poe Asphalt Inc. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Street and Stormwater Maintenance Contract Approval on April 24, 2007, Contract Renewals in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 BACKGROUND: The City conducted an RFP process in March 2007 for street and stormwater maintenance and repair services. In April 2007, the Council unanimously agreed to award the contract to Poe Asphalt Paving, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $1,175,119 and also authorized the City Manager to sign the contract and future, seven-year renewal options as provided in the RFP. This contract is a Cost Plus contract, meaning the City pays all direct costs plus a pre-negotiated overhead and profit percentage. This negotiated overhead and profit (OH & P) percentage is 22% for Direct Costs and 8% for Subcontractors work. These percentages have remained the same throughout this contract. Public Works staff met with Poe Asphalt to discuss the contractor's 2012 overall performance, and any changes either party would like to make to the program. Poe Asphalt has provided a satisfactory level of service during all previous contract years. In light of their performance, staff discussed renewal of the contract and negotiated the 2013 option year. The outcome of that negotiation process was a request for a 2.22% increase adjustment to the labor rates, due to union contracts that represent Poe AsphalYs employees. Poe Asphalt is not proposing any changes from the 2012 equipment rates, and Poe Asphalt was successful in providing a modest decrease in material costs for 2013. The impact of the proposed increase in labor rates versus the decrease in material costs to the 2013 contract renewal as compared to 2012 actual expenditures results in a net increase to the contract costs of $160.21 or a 0.002% overall costs increase. This very modest increase is due largely to the fact that the service contract is essentially comprised of 26% labor, 22% equipment and 52% for materials. Staff does not believe this very modest increase will affect service levels or the scope of work of the contract. Additionally, staff made changes to the 2013 Contract amount reducing it from $1,545,119 to $1,366,663 for Street Maintenance (reduction of $178,456 from 2012), and the $140,000 for snow plowing remains the same. This reduction in contract amount is due to a change in the scope of work. This contract will no longer construct mill and overlays. This contract adjustment is provided for within the contract under section 1.11.3 Compensation, which allows the contractor to request an adjustment in unit rates annually for the following 12 months, and these price adjustments, shall be negotiated with city staff. Staff reviewed and discussed these changes with Poe Asphalt, and is recommending renewal of their contract for 2013 with these requested changes OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute a contract with Poe Asphalt Inc. in an amount not to exceed $1,506,663 for the Street and Stormwater Maintenance and Snow Removal. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The contract will be funded by the approved 2013 budget. STAFF CONTACT: Eric Guth ATTACHMENTS: 2013 Draft Option Year Contract OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY �{��(�,�� CARY P. DRISKELL- CITY ATTORNEY Vall� ERIK J. LAMB - DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY � 11707 East Sprague Ave., Suite 103 ♦ Spokane Valley, WA 99206 509.720.5105 ♦ Fax: 509.688.0299 ♦ cityattorneyC�spokanevalley.org December 20, 2012 Poe Asphalt Paving, Inc. 2732 North Beck Road Post Falls, ID 83854 Re: Implementation of 2013 option year-Agreement for Street and Stormwater Maintenance and Repair Services, executed May 11, 2007 Dear Mr. Griffith: The City executed a contract for provision of Street and Stormwater Maintenance and Repair Services on May 11, 2007 by and between the City of Spokane Valley, hereinafter "Ciry" and Poe Asphalt Paving, Inc., hereinafter "Contractor" and jointly referred to as "Parties." The Request for Proposal states that it was for one year, with seven optional one-year terms possible if the parties mutually agree to exercise the options each year. This is the sixth of seven possible option years that can be exercised and runs through December 31, 2013. The City would like to exercise the 2013 option year of the Agreement. The Compensation as outlined in Exhibit A, 2013 Cost Proposal, includes the labor and material cost negotiated and shall not exceed $1,506,663. The contract includes $1,366,663 for Street & Stormwater Maintenance and $140,000 for snow removal operations. The history of the annual renewals is set forth as follows: Original contract amount .........................................$ 1,175,119.00 2008 Renewal ......................................................$ 1,475,119.00 2009 Renewal ..... ................................................$ 1,175,ll 9.00 2010 Renewal......................................................$ 1,375,119.00 2011 Renewal......................................................$ 1,545,119.00 2012 Renewal ......................................................$ 1,685,119.00 2013 Renewal......................................................$ 1,506,663.00 This contract option year will use the Asphalt Cost Price Adjustment per WSDOT Spec 5-04.5. The Contractor shall provide the cost adjustment for asphalt prices monthly and include this information with each monthly invoice. All of the other contract provisions contained in the original agreement are in place and will remain unchanged in exercising this option year. If you are in agreement with exercising the 2013 option year, please sign below to acknowledge the receipt and concurrence to perform the 2013 option year. Please return two copies to the City for execution, along with current insurance information. A fully executed original copy will be mailed to you for your files. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY POE ASPHALT PAVING, INC. Mike Jackson, City Manager Name Title ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the Ciry Attorney Exhibit"A" 2013 Cost Proposal 2013 20�3 Street Maintenance 100%wages I�af�or ho�rl overtime Material Costs Superintender�t $ 47.20 $ fi9.32 112" PG 64�28 50 gyro $ 52,00 Foreman $ 47.20 $ 61.32 112" PG 70-28 75 gyro $ 52.50 �perator $ 45.50 $ 58.87 112" PG 70-28 100 gyro $ 51.50 Teamsfer $ 43.52 $ 55.2� Top Course 518° $ 6.30 Laborer $ 40.14 $ 52.17 *Prfce adjustment based on ESDOT 5-Q4.4.OPT2.GR5 I 2fl13 2013 Snow Operations -90%wages Or►erhead � Profit fee Costs Labor houri overtime Direcfi cos#s 22% Superintendent $ 43.90 $ 56.32 Subcar�tractors 8% F'orernan $ 43.90 $ 56.32 Operator $ 42.16 $ 54.06 Teamster $ 41.18 $ 51.7Q Laborer $ 37,4� $ 48.24 i � 2013 2013 E ui ment costs E ui ment costs 2Q super dump $ 81,47 247 f550 1 ton $ 27.07 22 end dump $ 60.72 253 wafer fruck 220 gal $ 5Q.00 23 super dump $ 81.47 259 wafer truck 400Q gal $ 60.72 , 24 super dump $ 81.47 273 service truck $ 39.47 25 super dump $ 81.47 275 service truck $ 39.47 26 super dump $ 81.47 316 pickup $ 16.19 �I 27 super dump $ 81.47 319 pickup $ 16.19 28 super dump $ $1.47 402 dd34 ro!!er $ 44.7$ 29 end dump $ 60.72 4D6 dd34 roller $ 44.78 4Q end dump $ 60.72 410 dd110 roller $ 75.00 43 Tractor $ 60.72 413 dd110 roller $ 75.00 70 utility trailer $ 95.94 420 hahm roller $ 75.00 75 Lowbed trailer $ 37.44 421 plate wacker $ 5.36 132 trailer $ 15.94 461 grade roller $ 55.15 134 trailer $ 15.94 512 roadtec paver $ 185.00 �35 trailer $ 15.94 524 blawknox 5510 paver $ 185.OQ 145 tilt trailer $ 26.57 713 cat�60 blade $ $6.53 949 trailer $ 15.94 718 huber $ 55.66 915 4 axle pup $ 21.25 722 skiploader $ 5Q.60 �87 4 axle pup $ 21.25 926 tack trailer $ 16.19 988 4 axle pup $ 21.25 930 cimline crack/joint sealer $ 85A0 189 4 axle pup $ 21.25 947 20" saw $ 26.57 � 202 f450 1 ton $ 27.07 ; 205 f550 tack truck $ 50.QQ � 225 f450 dump truck $ 50.00 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 11`h, 2012 Department Director Approval: � Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business � new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. Report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Street Sweeping Contract Renewal — AAA Sweeping GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Street Sweeping Contract Approval on March 3, 2007 and Contract renewal in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012. BACKGROUND: The City conducted an RFP process in March 2007 for street sweeping. In April 2007, the Council unanimously agreed to award the contract to AAA Sweeping in an amount not to exceed $473,687, and authorized the City Manager to sign the contract and future, seven-year renewal options as provided in the RFP. AAA Sweeping provided a satisfactory level of service during 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012. The 2012 contract amount was approved at $490,199.94. The 2013 contract will be the sixth of seven possible option years, and the amount will stay the same at $490,199.94, which has remained the same amount since 2009. Public Works staff inet with AAA Sweeping as a matter of course to discuss the contractor's 2012 overall performance, and any changes we would like to make to the program, and discussed the renewal of the contract and negotiated the 2013 option year. The outcome of that negotiation process was a request for a 1% increase adjustment to the contract hourly rates. This adjustment is provided for within the contract as long as the Contractor's request does not exceed the CPI-U or a maximum of 3% annually, whichever is less. The CPI-U for October (released 11/15/12) was 2.2%. In this case, staff was able to negotiate a far less increase, which only pertains to the hourly rates. Staff is comfortable with keeping the contract amount the same as the past four years. OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the contract to AAA Sweeping in an amount not to exceed $490,199.94 for the Street Sweeping Contract. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The contract will be funded by the approved 2013 budget. STAFF CONTACT: Eric Guth ATTACHMENTS: 2013 option year contract, October 2012 CPI-U OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY SCpakane CARY P. DRISKELL - CITY ATTORNEY �� ERIK J. LAMB- DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY �x 11707 East Sprague Ave., Suite 103 ♦ Spokane Valley, WA 99206 509.720.5105 ♦ Fax: 509.688.0299 ♦ cityattorneyC�spokanevalley.org December 20, 2012 AAA Sweeping, LLC PO Box 624 Veradale, WA 99037 Re: Implementation of 2013 option year, Agreement for Street Sweeping Services, 07- 021, executed March 13, 2007 Dear Mr. Sargent: The City executed a contract for provision of Street Sweeping Services on March 13, 2007 by and between the City of Spokane Valley, hereinafter "City", and AAA Sweeping, LLC, hereinafter"Contractor" and jointly referred to as "Parties." The Request for Proposal states that it was for one year, with seven optional one-year terms possible if the parties mutually agree to exercise the options each year. This is the sixth of seven possible option years that can be exercised and runs through December 31, 2013. The City would like to exercise the 2013 option year of the Agreement. The Compensation as outlined in Exhibit A, 2013 Cost Proposal, includes the labor and material cost negotiated and shall not exceed $490,199.94. The history of the annual renewals is set forth as follows: Original contract amount .........................................$ 473,687.00 2008 Renewal ......................................................$ 479,717.02 2009 Renewal ..... ...... ..........................................$ 490,199.94 2010 Renewal............ ..........................................$ 490,199.94 2011 Renewal............ ..........................................$ 490,199.94 2012 Renewal ............ ..........................................$ 490,199.94 2013 Renewal............ ..........................................$ 490,199.94 The Parties further agree to various specification changes, which are set forth in Exhibit B — Specification Changes. All of the other contract provisions contained in the original agreement are in place and will remain unchanged in exercising this option year. If you are in agreement with exercising the 2013 option year, please sign below to acknowledge the receipt and concurrence to perform the 2013 option year. Please return two copies to the City for execution, along with current insurance information. A fully executed original copy will be mailed to you for your files. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY AAA SWEEPING, LLC Mike Jackson, City Manager Name Title ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the City Attorney Exhibit A - 2013 Cost Proposal 2013 Street Sweeping Contract Contractor : AAA Sweeping Item Task Unit Price 1 Mechanical Sweeper Hours $150.23 2 Kick/Angle Brooms Hours $110.02 3 Regenerative Air Sweeper Hours $150.23 4 Water Truck Hours $111.66 5 Dump Truck/End Truck Hours $111.66 6 Loader Hours $110.02 EXHIBIT B SPECIFICATION ADDENDA (RFP No. 07-001) Street Sweeping Services —2013 Option Year The following addenda are included to update Specifications listed as part of the Agreement for Street Sweeping Services, No. 07-001, executed March 13, 2007: Section 1.11 - CONTRACT 0 1.11.3—Compensation ■ REPLACE the 3rd Paragraph with the following: "Prices shall remain firm for the duration of the contract. If annual contract renewal options are exercised, the Contractor may request an adjustment of the contract prices annually by November 15Y for the following calendar year. Such prices shall be negotiated by the City and the Contractor, and shall not be increased or decreased by more than the percent change in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) or 3%whichever is smaller. The reference point will be the CPI-U for September (which normally is published mid-October) and the index base period is 1982-1984=100. The source of this percent change shall be the "United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics." Section 3.3 DISPOSAL OF REFUSE o REPLACE the last paragraph with the following: "If applicable,the Contractor shall keep the transfer points neat, clean, and free of excess litter. This includes cleanup of litter, refuse, and discarded materials from the site pads, access road, fence lines, and tree or brush lines. Under no circumstances shall the collected debris be stored at a temporary storage site for a period in excess of forty-five calendar days. All collected material posing a public health or safety hazard or having the potential to create a public nuisance shall be immediately disposed of at an appropriate landfill." CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 11, 2012 Department Director Approval: ❑ Check all that apply:❑ consent ❑ old business � new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Confirmation of Mayoral Appointments, Councilmembers to Boards and Committees GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Various ordinances, resolutions, and state statutes PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Annually, the Mayor makes appointment recommendations to place councilmembers on various regional boards and committees. The following are the Mayor's recommendations for each Councilmember's committee assignment: Mavor Towev: Councilmember Grassel: 1. Greater Spokane Incorporated(GSI) 1. Visit Spokane (formerly Convention&Visitor's 2. Spokane Valley Finance Committee Bureau) 3. Spokane Valley Governance Manual 2. International Trade Alliance (ITA) 4. Mayor's Association of NE Washington 5. TPA(Hotel/Advisory) Tourism Promotion Area Councilmember Hafner: 6.Wastewater Policy Advisory Board 1. Spokane Regional Health District Board 7. Health District 2. Spokane Transit Authority 8. Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency 3. Emergency Communications Board 911 4. Finance Committee Deputv Mavor Schimmels: 5. Growth Mgmt Steering Committee Elected Officials 1. Wastewater Policy Advisory Board 2. Spokane Regional Transportation Council(SRTC) Councilmember Woodard: 3. Spokane Transit Authority(STA) 1. Chamber of Commerce Board 4. Solid Waste Liaison Board 2. HCDAC(Housing and Community Development 5. Solid Waste Advisory Committee (app't confirmed Advisory Committee) by Spokane Co. Board of County Commissioners) Councilmember Wick: Councilmember Grafos: 1. Governance Manual 1. Finance Committee 2. Lodging Tax Advisory Committee 2. Growth Mgmt Steering Committee Elected Officials OPTIONS: Move to confirm the Mayoral appointments of Councilmembers to the committees and boards as modified or listed above. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move to confirm the Mayoral appointments of Councilmembers to the committees and boards and listed above. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: Chris Bainbridge ATTACHMENTS CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 12-11-12 Department Director Approval: ❑ Check all that apply:❑ consent ❑ old business � new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Mayoral Appointments: Lodging Tax Advisory Committee GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Spokane Valley Municipal Code 3.20; RCW 67.28 BACKGROUND: Notice of openings was placed in the Spokesman Review, the Valley News Herald, and on our website. Terms will begin January 1, 2013. Lod�ing Tax Advisorv Committee of Snokane Vallev Committee consists of 2 members required to collect tax; 2 involved in funded activities, one councilmember. Terms are for one or two years. Applicants include: Keith Backsen,Visit Spokane (involved in funded activities) Herman Meier,Heritage Museum (involved in funded activities) Claud R Rick Wilhite,Valleyfest(involved in funded activities) Lee Cameron [incumbent] required to collect the tax Jeff Fiman[incumbent] required to collect the tax Mayor to make four appointments. Terms are for one or two years. Recommended Motion: Motion to confirm Mayoral appointments to the Lodging Ta� Advisory Committee as follows: 1. for a one-year term (representing an entity authorized to be funded by the ta�) 2. for a two-year term (representing an entity authorized to be funded by the ta�) 3. for a one-year term (representing a business required to collect the ta�) 4. for a two-year term (representing a business required to collect the tax) BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: n/a STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun ATTACHMENTS Individual applications e . ' t•4` i-�•, ." i,. �c�rl no�� . �� :��;,� �V11�� '�T}'()r. 4�� t�� / 1 . ��\►+� � `��"' �5 � t� U1t m ��Ty 4/��€�� '�'�i?:� •`�CI� ' �. Applica#ion Form for � Commi#teeslBoardslComrnissions Return Completed form to City Clerk at City Nalf, 11707 E. Sprague A�e. Suife 106 � Spokane Val�ey,WA 99206 5Q9-720-5102 phone; 509-688-0994 fax P051TION APPLYfNG F�R: �odgtng 7ax Advisory Commiitea , '� App[icant's name (�fease print): Ke��h wiuiam�a�x5en . � ' Appl�cant'S ReSIdellCe Addl'ess:T9�4 S.Ridgemont�rive Spokane Valley � 99037 Sfreet City zip Code Applicant'S Malflrlg Add1'eSS(i#diiierent from Residence address): ' SfreeE Cily Zip Code Applicant�S En'lall: kbacksen@visitspofcana,com Home F'hone; 549-891-7206 WOfk Ph011e:509-742-9375 Cell PhOfl8:549-993-9819 LengEi�of fime continuously lived witi�in Spokane Valley City Limits: 7 vears N07E:You musk be a resident of the Cify of Spokane Valiey fo participate on most�oarc[s, committees and commissions. Gender:Feinale� Male� U.S.Citizen7 YBS Wa.State Registered voter7 Yes gMPT�OYMENT HIS'I'ORY: Present ox last empIoyer; �isit spokane Position Held: �ce Presldentlolrector of Conventbn Seles and 5ervlces Dates o£Employment: 2405-Present Address: a01 W.Riverside Aven�e,Suife 30i,Spokane,WA 9920i Phone: 509-624-i 34�1 Previous�mpIoyer: G�S-Global�xperlance Speclallsfs Positio3i Held: fl�recfor of Sales-Central�ivis(on Dates of Em�loyinent:2000-2045 AddTess: 5248 S.Cicero Avenue,Chicago,IL 60632 PhDne: 773-767-2237' �DUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: High ScI-�ool; Canby Union High School Diploma: Yes � No � C1ty/State Adaress 72T SW 41h,Can6y,OR 97013 BS in Hotel Restaurant&Tourlsm College/University: oregon state university Degree Earned; �anagement 1987 City/State Address: co�vau�s,OR 97334 College/Universzty. Degree Earned: City/Sfate Address: „ , ;f . . � .i. �, . . .-. � �. . =.. . � � ..��._. , � COMMiJIVITY RELA'I'ED ACTIVITIES,PAST&PRES�NT:(atEach additional sheets iF necessary) Present-Member of lite Spokane HofellMotel Associafion Present-Honorary Eagie with the 92nd Air Re€�elfng team at Felrchild Air Force Base Preseni-Supporfer of ihe Cenlral Valiey High School 7rack and Cross Cot�niry team Pasf-Graduate of Leadershlp Spokane VOI.UNTSLR EXPERIENCBS,PAST 8z PR�S�NT: � Presenf-Spolcana Rivar cleanup;food svrtiflg ai 2nd Harvest;blood dvnor for Inlend NorlhS'test Blood Center Past-Communfiy service pro;ects with my church and tndustry organ4zatlons. Palnted tivalls and landscaped at a Women and Children's Shelter In Las Vegae. Organized intetlor an�ex�oi�clean-up p�o ec s o�v�c ui�rc� aug-t-Su�a�cboo an sang fn chu�ch choir.-------'-`""-T_____. SPECIA�.SKiI,LS/INTERESTS: Skilfs f can bring to Ehis commi€tee are'experlence fn worlcing wzlh groups on projects,building consensus,developing a worlc plan and managing i i both pro]ecf goals and budgeEs to delivar a fnished producf on tims and on budgel, I possess excelfenE communication skills and expedence managing teams bofh large and small. �nteresis: Hilcing,skiing and watar aclivities;s�orlc(ng on home and yard improvement projecls. PAST OR PRESENT MEMB�R OF THE FO�,OWIlJG PROFESSIONAL,CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS OR GOVERNMENT BOARDS,COMMITFE�S,OR COMMISSIONS: See Attachment A Committee Name City/State Committee Name City/State Committee Name City/State ' ' What do you feel you can contribute to the community that may not be e�+ident from inforn�ation already furnished7 Sea Attachmen!B Why do you feel you are qaalifiec{to act as a member of the�oard,Committee or Commission for which you are applying7 See Affachmant C Would your appointment to this position create a conflict of interest or an appearance of a mnflict of interest? �0 Should a topfc arise fhat presants thal possibility,f tivo�ld rescua mysefF from weighing�n on that parBcular Issue. . . , �' � � �: , . !. � . - � .. � . ' � � .,�y t ! � � �� _ � � �. �..._...��.�.�.�___.�� l �s� �� . r Signature �� Today's Date • .. . , ,, �� ,-, :� �� , �� ,:, , f-. ,. � . . , . 3 ! . Ci#y of Spokane Va[ley �!, [.oaging Tax Advisory Commit#ee App[ica#ion I Attachment A PAST OR PRESENT MEMBER OF THE FOL.L.OWING PROFESSf�NAI., CIV[C ORGANIZATIONS OR GOVERNMENT BOARDS, C�MMITTEES,�OR COMMiSSI�NS; Current -- Cammi#tee Member - City of Spokane Valley Economic Development s ----— Gorrmmit�ee�pokane Valley;Washingtan .____..____�__._._�_.__—___ � Curren# -- Chapter President - Pacific Nar�hwest Chapter of Professianal Conventian Management Association, Seattle Washington Currenf -- indusfry Relations Chair� Convention Sales Professional international Board of Directors, Princeton Junction, New Jersey _ Current--�Committee Member - DMO EmpowerMlNT Adoption Sub- Committee - Destinatfon Marketing Association International, Washington, D.C. Current -- Member - Hotel Sa[es and Marketing Association International, Washington, D.C. Pasf-- Past Chair, Board of Trustees - Veradale Unfted Church of Ghrist, Spokane Valley, WA Past -- Baard Member� American Cancer-Society, Spakane Chapter, Spakane Valley, WA � Past -- Cammittee Member -Washington Lodging Association Green Team Alfiance, . Olympia, WA Attachment B What do you feet you can contribute to the communi#y t�at may not be evident from information already furnis�ed? i fiave a passion to see Spokane Vafley grow and prosper with the r[ght mix of new , develapment. I respect the historic past af#he Spokane Val�ey and want to see the community embrace ifs nafural assets such as the river and naturaf areas like Dishman HilEs and MErabeau Park. My experience working an many boards and commiftees has helped me to understand what it takes to work with diverse groups of peopfe and ideas ta buifd consensus and reach a posit�ve outcome. I have a sense of dedication and the necessary patience to see projects and tasks t�rough to comp[etion. . � City of Spokane Vall�y Lodging Tax Advisory Commitfee Application Attachment C ', Why do you f�el you ar� qual€fied fo acf as a member of#he Board, Commift�e or li Commission forwh�ch you ar� applying? Economic Devefopment through tourism is crftical to the success af our community. As - a-residen#-of��pokane Vaifey,—i#-is-important-to-me-to-see-o�r-communiky-thrive-by -- - ---------- devefoping successful businesses and events that maximize the visitor experience. My decades of experience working directfy in #he tourism industry would be a very �enef�cia! addi#�on to t�e committee assigned ta advise the council on the use of iodging tax funds for the benefit af Spo�Cane Vaifey. Taurism is the 4th �argest employer in t�e state of Washington. �n many communifies, small and farge, tourism fuels their main streets, attracfs people to relocate their families and their businesses and drives t�e qualify of life for its residents. For the last seven years Spokane Valley has been my home. Before that, I had the pleasure to live in some �reat communities where tourism worked hand in hand wi#� economic devefopmen# to create a sense of community. 1n those places, people drave to work in the big city, but could not waif to escape bacEc to the communities they cal[ed home at the end of a work day. Families did not have to leave on the weekend to find _ leisure ac#ivities to enjoy. Spokane Valley has these same kinds of attributes just. wai#[ng to be ful[y developed and appreciated. Similar communities incl�de cit�es like Plainfeld, lll�nois, a suburb of Chicago, L.ewisville, Texas, a suburb of Daflas; and Newberg, Oregon, ane of many bedroom communities to Portland. Each of these communities contEnues to exist today because they use the power of tourism developmen# to drive the quality of life for their residents, Qualify of life [s the single mast important factor thaf attracts a large emp[oyer to refocate or draws more residents who may work oufside Spokane VaEley, but want to call the Valley home. _�:,; �� „��r�e � . �a�1ey. ApplNCa��ow� Form fo�r Commi�teesl�oardslComm�ssgons ' Return Compteted farm ta City Cterk at City Half, 117a7 E. Sprague Ave. Suite 106 Spokane Valley,WA 99206 5p9-720-5102 phone; 545-68&a'[94 fax P051TIONAPPLYiNGFOR: �a�L�.t�Ci �AK liOl.V�50�R.0 w�'�t��. � Applicant`s narrze �pfease print):__ ��24!Yl�4+V _ V vt�I�_ _ _ _ ' Applicant's Residence Address= ��b_[5 `6. �l7 L��SL�'�! �U� ��3r�N� I��l�,�rk.�, W_ Q��, Street City Zip Code AppliCant's Maifing Address (Ef differentfram Restdence address): 5pu1Af r Street City Zip Code Applicant's �maiE:. �1�4..►nnANrM�r�� tb�wtAt� . �osrv� � , ,_,_, Home f'hone:. . . -- � WorEc F'hone:__�S1_tlt.r7'l� Cell Phone:.5�•�q��o�'23 �engfh of time conEinuously lived wifhin Spo�Cane Valley City Limits; t�Sc.1¢asas � Val.ls� 3( t,l ffARS NOTE:You must be a residenf of the Clfy of Spokane Valiey to participa— t-�� boards,co mitfees nd commissions. Ge�der:Fema�e� Ma�e� U.S.Cikizen? �25 Wa.State Registeredvoter? En��o�r xrs�roRY: Present or Iast empla er; '�'c i2, �.+�e � S-�RVtic� �'�l�.oU� PasitionHe�d: � NSt� �A Dateso£��oaployment:_�Qb2 - 2007t3 �_ Address: l L E, 10�`5-�. �U I� �b - S Phone: �'95_�542 ' �O�S' Previous�rnployer: �-�0�u '�'1Qvvti,�V '�5 1 � J�/�C2g 'r�'��L� '1�4�i� GJ� CI� �. Posztion Hela: � � �i.�-v �t � T ["�i E Da es oFEmploy�nent:__4��-� �f�b2 Address: l o W � `�-� hk, 1 flo o n� WA •^ P�.one: 5oQ��74��13[ EDUCA'I70NAL HACKGROUND: High School: W10rJ'�Lo� �U IV to�7 =l�t�l�1 �C�an�-. , Diplo�oaa: Yes � No� City/State Addxess ��N+iZp� l�]!.1 College/Univexsity; �� AN� " a �� t�� Degree.�arned:_ �� , CXty/State Address: 41 3 c7" Q 5 Po ►�g, h Ca�ege/[Tniversity: AS 1 �1JAiC � �N4�1 t Degree�arnea; �� City/State Address: '�26 5��$� C�Q,a �l/,S, {� - �. �,-�, ._� i F•. , • ��`� 1 �7 ' _;•� � t:�:.,f. l.;i;'��;.f�:;;-°r;% ,� �� • , . � .;�Fti£.t�, �l.Fy� f"��C:l.r:�;� a COMMUrTI�Y RFsI.ATED ACTTVITIES,PAST$t PRESEIVT:(attach additional sheets i£necessary) _. _�Pp1Zlix9� Z�u�QSThT� �f A�2 � Et��tt�i� ��c� �g82��,T�Lt[�l F'�5�"t�Zc�tt�i�tc1�J �As?'eWv WAsc�„ve`fioN �AR1r� ��[Ll1qC�,t S11a�yuC b2c�An��a2l�k�li�c7-OR�� r�n�scse�r�^��aN .o�Po�t.-��N:� Toc�.�N �i � A� C��NERAL 'Wl�{NI�GIS�Q r Pl� �, , V.St IM-�L��R� �c,kes t�A ��c��.�� VOLUN�R E7CPE�IIIJCES,PAST�PRESEN�': rr C�n-�b��.�� eNa��., �,�-o�R .�a�t.�, ��y��g cl�aru �Z�.d�Ct,�1U �-.��. ��s _ �'�,�_4 o�Nc�t�`�rzatil 'h3�, �c� ,u � r (��- J , r �(__E�I/��v�v1N�i.__.SPo K�i1v� l//a�le�c1 ��t�2� ��g' �Us�►zlWl COacN—�-dR�AN.+Zr�2 Uou'r`h �lae.IC�v. �RaefLAW4�' ._U.S'.Yh,1q, W�s�'F�arN� 1VlJ f SP�CIAI,SIQLIS/]NTk�RESTS: �'rz�av�L�p (.tiv �-u_, v�2 ,S �c7 c�' o Aiu 4 A�tIM 1� �� R -WoocA a�2 �na ��A+T.�c�.��.�-�C �n�R �r�� z.v ��u4r. Ev�i�T PAST OR PRESENT NiEMBER OF'THL�FOLZ.OWIl�TG PROF�SSIONAL,CIV.[C ORGANiZATIONS OR GOVERNM�NT BOARDS,CO�ES,OR COMNIISSIONS: �r�sa l�R�ssit7gNl '�4Rgc,�c�A- �+ut,nNp Ev+n ti�2.� �`f'��am� C�as �u s 5po � Wi� Committee Nam� City/State ��n a� +� ��.�-d�s ,. �pQkr�� vr��lg �at��,� �Muze�v� SPoC�n,�. Uh6��v uv�1 Committee Nat�te {��y/�� Q��i C7�'PoR�'�n:�� (�.t9 w►rv�+�#c��C��s� u•�,m�A. U.�,�s�� atN`C A1 Committee Natne C'sty/State W�at do you£eel pou can contribute to the community that may not be e�ident from i.n�o,rmation already furn�shed? 2 'w 4 I,1 b� e� vr�L u A 6�� eo N'�'2�'�cr�ti(� --�o �. (2m u� �u Q �a vri sN�`R�►u�P �ROw�.a'��oN . o� o�1L C'�`�' WLu ��AC�+�Rs�,�P A�� '� �r , i '� • L 1 � C.'�{�{ti0�� rv 6n� � t 1 b •l � � �por'a["'1�la/l�S l�,C �fL2P/�'Qrs�.k hM1�? � '�-t�C4iZk -1.4r!'F'�.. �r" �V� �k �� RR�ssc�ps� Why da yau feel you are c� e to act as a m�ber a£the Aoazd,Committee oz Comn,i�.�ion�or which you are aPP1Y�g� 1 ��1n,A�r� �A��tct (�r��e� t,N �1Q�res� .Lbe�q�,N� -'�� r'uw��.i� CYC1r�S AS t � u �`b1 2a c 1 fl 12. . 1�1. �nn�7 �ov�R�as 11n� 1�Rac�ss oF ��►,� �,,� o� 5�Jo�iaN� 1la 6�� -a t�Ro �-�s �Q �n� �t� Would your apgoinkment to this position create a conflict o£Snterest or an agpearance of a rnn€Lict ofinterest? � . .� . � �Pn s�acr' •l6_, 2062 5ignature Today's Date i ' . i � , . ;' I . � �pOl��ne . . �a1�.eyQ Application Form for � ComrnifteeslBoardslCo�xlmiss�o�s Return Completed form to City Clerk at � City Ha11, �1707 E. Sprague Ave. Suite 108 � Spokane Val�ey,WA 99208 , 509-720-5�02 phone; 509-588-0�94 fax POSITEON APPLYf NG FOFZ: LdDGII3G TAX ADVISORY COMMI�'TEE AAplicant's name (please Arint): CLAUD R. 6�lILHITE . Applicank's Residence Address: 1010 S. SUNNXVAT�E LANE SPOKp.NE VAT�T�EX 99037 Streef � Cily Zip Code ApAlicant's Mailing Address (if different Prom Residence address}: � Street City Zip Code Ap�licant's Emai[: wa].ha.�e xa�ck@hotmail.com � �{ome Phone: 9��"3808 Wo�k Phone: 5�`�rg�� Cel[Phone: 991--6534 Length of tirne continuously lived vvitf�in SAokane Valley CiEy Limits; �S �ARS NOTE: You must be a resident of tF�e Cify of Spokane Valley to participate on most boards, commiftees and cor�missions. Gender:�'emale� Male� U.S. Ci�izen7 x�� 'UVa.State Registered voter? XES �MPLOYMENT HISTORY; Present or last ernployer: SAF�GUAI�D BUSINESS SYSTEh45 Position Held: QS'�� Dates of Employment: AUGUST 1981 -- PRESENT Address: b17 N. TiELENA SPQKAN� WA 99202 Phone: �34-9142 Previous�inployer. ��ONS, SEID'�W�LL ADV�R�ISZNG AGENCY Position Held: �`��TING EXECU��V� Dates ofEmployanent: �g�$ ` �9�� Address: Coons, '�ho�well t�rent out of busi.n�ss a.n abou� ].983. The offi.ce Phone: taas loca�ed jus� Sdest, abou� 4 blocks, of �he Spokane Club, Spokane, 6aA �DUCATTONAL SACKGROUND: High Schaol: x��N �'ALLS HIGH SCHOOL Diploma: Yes � No � Ciky/State Addres5 ��N FALLS, IDAHO COl�e�e/LTniversity: UN�V�RST'FY dF IDAHO Degree Earned; HA City�State Address: MOSCDW, IDAHd • College/LJniversiCy: UN�VEftSITY OF KANSAS Degree Earned: � City/State Address: �Udk�NCE, ICANSAS , ' i 1 .. . � . i Y r�, .. .-F . ... i...I A��7�" I � ��1 .=i�v i��=�:;��;lnr;!�til�s��ti° Ct�f t,i��d;K . . ' � . � . - � ' h �COMMC1NiTY REJ�A.T�D AG'�'�Vr�'I�S,PAST&PR�S�NT:(attach additional she�ts i�necessary) VA�LLEYFEST (�oarcl} ; SPOK�INE CONVEN�'rON and'VY5rTOR5 BUE�EAU: GREATER SPOKA� Z[��. : GRE1ATER �SPOKANE VALL�� • ' , CHAA1HETt OF CObiMERC�: -SPOKANE HOPdEBUxLbEftS ASSOC7ATrbt+1: �US(YlO�SS ��SOURCE CON[�EC'�'IONS ASSQC. , . . . . , �VOT�YTNTE�R�'ERIENCES,PAST&PRESBNT: � � . - ' COPiRfrTTEE �O INCOR:�ORATE S�OKANE VALL�Y " � • • • F'rRE•& SAFE�'Y'INCQR:�Oi�T�ON COMA7I'7."�E FOR.'3'H� CI'3'X Ok� S1'OKANE' VAF�LEX � . VALLEYFEST ' . . • � � SP�CTAL SKdI.�SS/INT�RESTS. � . . � . . 33. XEARS AS OtVNER Ok' A SUCOE�SSFUL SUSINESS. �REVIOUS EKPERIENC�:� ' 3 yeaxs as �ccount Exeetuive ��ith• Coons, �Sho�el3..�� 5 years Marke�.�ng,.Exee .caith N.t�7. Ayer ASH Znterr�ata.ona3, . eta or ; . years � i� Re a�zons Director, .Parker Pen Companyy-�anesvzlle, jVis: . ' . �n,joy ,sailing, �hotoc��r. •readinc� a^�ond hook and �?n�a�i_nc�f�ne a�ine. ' • � . • . � . . P1�ST OR PRESENT M�MB�R OF T��FCILLClWIl1G PROF��SIUNAL,CIVIC CIRGANF�ATIONS OR. • GO�ERN'1VI�I`I'I'$OARDS,COIVFMITT$�S,OR COMMLSSIONS. � ' • �VALLEXr�Sm. Soard Presidnet • • ' . ' Spokan� Va13eX • Committee Name ' � � . � " City/State Gem o� �he V�a�.ley Ga3a, Chair � � � Spokane val.leX Committee Name • - � � City/State - United States Da.s�r�.bu�.or As.so�ia�ion, Boa�d� member & T�easu�er. Aal�.as, �'X � Comtnittee Name ' � � _ City/State • � Wk1at d.Q you feel you can contribute to the Community that may not be evident from information a�ready furr�ished? Years b�fore� Spokane Va�.ley ancorporated, r .embraced• the �.dea �at �iae •needed to have a ci�y East of Sgokane. ' No�a that �pokane .Va3:3.�ey �is a xeali.ty, I re�iazn dedzcated �o the ways and � means of. enrich�ng the venues wz�hin Spokane Va�.ley r�o� only'.economica y u� cu �.uxa �.y �for a31..ci�izens �n•�he comme�rii�y: I strong�y'belzeve that Va�.'].ey�ea� does an.ou�s�.anda.ng � � . aszng. . " thousanci.s �nore to �he beauty and poten�a.a�s o� Spokar►e�,y�alley. - � • Why do you feel you axe qualified tQ ect as a member of the Board,Committee or Commissior►for whic�.you a�e appiying7 My busine�s b�ackground has made me� we11� awax� Qf the needs of v�rioe�s groups incZudzng ho.�e�iers &� a�hletic group� as well as non-profi,t oxgani.zati.ons. Wi.th my business backg�ound as -t•re�3.,as my ma�keting and publ.zc re�.ati.ons experience, -r�woulci. br�ng . � , ' � objecti.vity �3:ong wi.�h•a cans�rva�ive. sense of�responsibilxty tkiat-dol�.ars spent be 'in the . . � �=��'ol%ld.your appoin�rnentto thispositipzi create�conflict o�int�rest or'asi a�pe�reitce of�.�Coz.�#�.i��v�i�t�x��t7� ��Y . � � : • -s_._._�. ..... . . . ' _ . . .- . .' � ;� . . . • . ' . . - . . .: . . . . : . . . . . . . . � . . . !"`. • , . ..• '� ` . Y . • �'J . ./. • . : , . � . ' . . . ' , • ' � •/ � . Signature � _ � . ' • . . Today's Date ' � . • . ��U—�5-2�12 ��:�4 �RUM:LEE L CAMERO� 5�992262SS TO:S688��36 P.i � _ , � = - �;. Y,' Y _ '.. 5_'}�� : �Si. � F`} .+ c 3 � 3 � _��:.� � � ..V �� '�.. e C17Y pf-�,F� �:lle3' ��r-YGZ�,V��y .:M/� - . � .Appl�cat�cn �or-m �aw � C�r1itR11�t�e�S/�oards/Ca_m�isslons �i�eturn Comp�eted.�farm fo �:[ty Cl�erk at �fi�l}�alI,:117Q7�E,:Spragi�e.AVe.:5�it� 90�' I Sp'4ka�ie'Va!ley��,WA .89�08' sa$•��o��.az�no,i�; �oo�s$�=ai_$�rax �F'0�171bN�AF'PLYINO F'Qft: �+��G7�1C� C� . . Applicant`s name.(please prfnt): . �-�E_ �� _ ` ��1�A�/� : Appllasnl�e eslde� �baldres�• . 'o . str�ef Cl�y Z�p��ode ` Ap�Eleanf�5 M�I[Iq,�Aciclf968-�{!`diff�terikftarii fi�gst�'ence ad8iees];• . � S'l�a�t City �I�C��e AppJfc��k''s �`mall� L..0 �_ . v ° • ' . . . Koirie'Pf�onea � .�Nork��ho�re:.�,2a�� ag[��.3�'�'p : cell phone�.e25� �S� �S� LengltY of llme:c�rifinuo�f�ly.l(ved W�Eiiln Spokar�e Va��ey CEIy�Limife: q �/�5 ... _ � NOTE;You i�usf be��a r.estdent.��tGi�o Cify df'S�okanA Vafie.y to�art clpa�b o�1•iri4a�bbe�ds;.commkE�ees and cammissions, �C��d��:�ema��:� �Male.� '[.T,S.Ctttz'en? W�,Stafie�Regist�ieclvote�? . EM A.�OYIviRN"r=H:I�TOR�. prese�nf�pr.l�st er�plb�yer+ . - - L'osit�csf��Ie�i�;._., �LUrV�,2 �, Datgs af�Liriplc�.yrt�eiit�, 8 Adtlress; �. S .o . :�'ha1�eF. �a9 9v'ttf ��dr� :�x�vlo;u$��?m}��Idyeks �. I�o;��ti��el�i�p . Dn e's bf�tnplQyme��. d.-- � �A�drP;s's:�2.�3nSC �-��F� y.�`-�_[��...I.-�f1-R..�n��.A- - ----_ pHo��y ,a..�� ra�r�_ ��g� EpUCA�;i��`��3ACICG��U1�D� H��h�Sc�i4o1.-. ,��,Q�L./�ll ,f�/�N - --- Di�lo.t��; Yes � �io�� Gity%StaG�A�d'ress 5 _ , A �a�f�g�/iJ�ii��.refiy;: . la.��tS�l��.!�G�-[xs� �"Rau�. G��/1�_J.� A•,egr,��E�rnecl: Gi��jS�atetAddress,.�pr�L[..�tn�R.. _ _ Qoj1�g��Lv��$��:. . . . "De$�ee,.�`a�nea: , , _ City/Stak�.A��3 r�s"s.'� . . . ��i.��t'��r�4:t►�5�tir��l►y.�►Is�zli�:iliar�.fc��C-s�t33i�i�i.E�li3zs,��c�x;(`a�iar�±�ies�t5nk 1?f�'� ��bf� J��n�a'r}'�{S f�l . NOU-15-2012 00.3� FROM.LEE L CAM��ON 5�99226295 T0:96880�36 P.2 � ` ' , i �QM11iML1N1TY"RE�ATEDA��'iVITIE$,�'AST&�PRESE[�}T;(Attsch.nddiClon�slieetslf'nec.essnryi),_�ta.�F�I� _ j ... p .. . . [�-r�n1v qF �1 ... . Ql�. XJ j 1' . , �om v� _ ._ . u� ._ . �' � , b .. �� o q-�:�� Pol.cAti► �L N�aT�L��,a�T� L �S.�rV.� S"Po1�CA NE V AL�E� L��a�N� VOI�`iJNT�L�R��X�?�RIENCES;�PA�T&.PIZE�ENT;•'TX�}� /�L�l/IS,o�2c� 3��.A. o_ r r,��a ti/ o�,dA�J I � . N .� S� , �... o � � y ou � G'� G°�,u i �- a r � �c.�r1r�,�.�� a,v�,r- (J�s�-r-�f� �rc�e� us �+�,,�ca� ��,b ��sA� CGu�.�r ��G:..,��K��5/S[�T��STS; rv�q s�a�u �.,ou,�r�r �,�v�r r.a� �x �4 A U/S v f�c� �3oA�l�,D. 5 ,T rv � �AST OR-PR�S�ITXVf.�M13T.sR�1��nga��:Q�?ViNG PRak?�SS�C�I�3'A��C�UI�Q�GAlYI�A`�YQ�'S OR G.�VT��N�VI�I�N��O�►RpS,C�1ViM1T1��$,.��t GOMMFSSi0�18; ��P o G� � � `� vls�,� ComttiikC�eNgm'e Ci�y/St�te S,E � ��ori'imittiee Nati�e . . . .. C�'ty/.S�ate Comiti�t�ee�7am� -Gity.'IState �hat�tl�,}�du feel�you cah conhibute tio.the�eoi�mtinity rhat may not be e'�ident fro�:iriFormat�bn slxeac�yfur�t�she�2 7 ha v r � ,U � GA y � � � . . ... � . � �' �U . � , . � �.,�/ V,l�iydo you:fee�'y4u�axe gua��fle�d ro��as�me��x o£�he.�bae�l,Ca�n�ittee.ot'Colttmission f`or��+htCh:you are appl.yir±�7= l!/� �L1 N N _ T Al �%�� iaR v .7N� L,� � �l� U � Gro (�GL R �. .�iN T /h�M Zi�(+: ��77�� G'QJhNf �/�i . �ouCdyouxajipa�,- -' e�i,t'k¢t�i�pQSitIQ�c��.�t;e��conf��dtoFit�te�e�tar a�►R�p�e�rarice�o�n cd�i�ll;�,to,��nxer:est7,� .1� 1 W 1.2. . �5�gi�a�i�r'� � �L� �. fl M�� oday'�Aar� . {�xy. �.Fh�tu_1�nt[e�lE�l!u�A��}�f�.�-{t�[tl}�f�r'C'ot3,rn��{��#If3c,t�c(ty`C'�t«►��i�si��ns 3�xi�e:?�:}5 J�l,aaY�z r�f� �r � � �. . . I �❑ r �s�1'�g� � . I �� `r}` ~*%��f �'�sf� �,� t•3 ��1° _ ,t`:�f�.{t�'��,�� el "�`.( I 4,''.�f' ,A�pp9�ca�lon Fo�rm �ox �Ot'11f1[l�'��4�S1�o2��"dS/�O1riArij5siO�tS Fietutn Campleted form ta City Ciark at City F�alf, T�aoa E.spragueAve, Sufte 106 �pokane Val�e �920� 6d�-720-87�2 pho�t 6�9�688-01�4 f8 POSfT1oN APPLYING FOR: • b � f %f1 X A �O M � , Applicsnt's nafine(please print): � l� I' Appficsllt'� esldenoe Address: r"1�,�Sf' ..� '�� y � � St�set CfEy �ip Code AppI1C�n1'&MalliFl� Addf988(if dlKsrant P�am Fiesldenca addtoss}: ....�A!^��. 1a.5 Z! �o�g P�' � s'treet CiEy p Appllae�t's Em�fl: x/ "' Home P�ona. ,��f'aD�/ �--- WorEc Pha�e: --�' Gell Phone. .�og�'L��Lo �eng#h oF fimg conEinuously lived within 9pokane Valley G�ty Lir�its; � ' ' � NOTE:You must bs a resldet�t oi the C9iy oF Spoka�ta Vp11ey to pa�ifcipa�e aE�m t boards, comr�llf888 8Rd coR111115sTons. Ge�derc�emale� Male� U.S.Citiaen2 ��,,5 Wa,3tate R�giStEred vote�?_...��— � �MPY.p�MENT HISTORY; Present o�last emptoyer: � �� Qosition Held:,.,,_ ��,r[.?'''I li� Dates o,f�mp[oymen�: — Address:_.... . . ��,.,�3___� Mr`S:SiQ��=�.�,� l� L � �honet� L�1?9- �1 a'L�'~.�2 I � . Previous Em�sloyeec �S i�r 1 i Y �/ '"' �'a�° PasiKion Held: o �F .a Dates af�sn�loyment; C5 � AddXess; 1'�AGL�,S. �3C �'� �"°'� o Phone:,�2��.��d EDUCATIONAL]3A KGRQUND: High�c�iaol: L ��1 i Dip7ama� 7�ea� rIo � City/State Address^.�, � Coilege/Clnivarsity:, �Jl� �. � _ Degree�arned: � �� '�� CitplStat�Add�'ess; �" ,.— ColYe e/[3�ni�ersf ; DegK�e E�rned: r g �Y � CitylState Addxess: , � . � II� i1�:1�S�t'.�1 �'.�I�i s �:Ity��.. 1'tll niP � .tli Lui1 � . �i �111. . .: :i r'il'. j'�.. �if • 1 � I,�r�•�rt'� '1� 11 I . ' i'.a'.-I tiG.TR Rs�� GIC:01 �GiJ NNT N�fi?M�l NC11�71-[:woa.� ZS':�Z �ZGi�-S'�-I'�R COMN1�}N1TY�T.A'��1]AC'I'I�Ti�S,PAST&PR�sSENT;(nttacl��ddittonal sheets if necessat�l) �,.1 ` G�o r!/yi i �� - d �� OLL�ER EXP�RT�NCES.PAS'�&PR�S�TV'T; ��1� �, ��/� Gr � e�c.�� _. _..�... � , .,_. .. , SPECIAI.S�CCLT�S/INTEf�S'I'�; ;i� ' .�' ��I� PAST Olz PRES&NT M�MBE�OF TH��Ox�.4�<IN��'ROF�SSXON'AT,,CT�IC ORGRN��ATY01V5 OR GO'V�RT�M�NT]30ARll5,COIVEIVIITTE�S,OR COMMISSIONS: �ca��. Committee NsmB G�ty/Stat� �'`' � an1 �t'�"G�1 Y �.� � .J�'�e �ac.`�'i% � � L1r� �!A Gommitte2 N�me City/�tste Commietee Nama CiGylState '��'hat do yau feel you ca�n cantribute to tk�e t�mm�nity that may not be e�riden�from infosmat�on a.lready�urnished7 ��'v 7 G/ `Ol0 l� /� !J .V �it/ �� n� l 7�9`�'� �� Y i�l bs� I.QT ' � i�; � � Why do you feel you are qu�lrfled to�Ct�s a member of�he I3oazc�,Committee or•Cvmm3ssion for�vhich you axe � appiyln�? � � , ,�, l _�� - ..��7�� DU l �P�jC�� I�LL� DW%/7� I n1 0;�'� �U� uc�_s" i.q-x � S� v�iG i2,E�J �,e��,��',�,�s:,�� .fQ�lt� . Wou1d yourappvintment ro Chis posiCion Create A_conflict of interest or a�ti appearsnce o�a.conEiict of interest?�� ,✓�-vt.�,__, _,�.. Signa re Taday`s A te , � 111 i�F �'�ie.}i:l:i. .�i��5'S ��l�l.�I�:i�F.�;l �i;i { ��1'Iiirl:�.� ��i111�.�� rs:.11J1 .f:�i.•� �'iS^ � I�� + 1i��,.l;i,., liljtF ' �r�'� �6�0 889 605�a.L zez 1`�I�I I`k�d�Il��J" N011II-i:wa-�.� ��:zT zTOZ-�z--1�0 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 11, 2012 Department Director Approval: ❑ Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business � new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Planning Commission Mayoral Appointments GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Spokane Valley Municipal Code 18.10. BACKGROUND: There are currently three opening on the Planning Commission. According to SVMC 18.10, members of the Planning Commission shall be nominated by the Mayor and confirmed by a majority vote of at least four members of the City Council. Planning Commissioners shall be selected without respect to political affiliations, and shall serve without compensation. Terms shall be for a three-year period and shall expire on the thirty-first day of December. The vacancy announcement was posted on the City's webpage, and was published in the Spokesman Review and in the Valley News Herald. The deadline to submit an application was November 16, 2012. Councilmembers were distributed copies of the applications shortly after the submittal deadline. Mayor Towey will announce his recommendations at the December 11, 2012 meeting. OPTIONS: 1. Approve the Mayor's Recommended Appointments 2. Choose not to approve 3. Take other action deemed appropriate by council. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move to confirm the Mayor's recommended appointments to the Planning Commission,with a three year term beginning January 1, 2013, as follows: 1. 2. 3. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: Mayor Towey ATTACHMENTS: Individual applications from: Kevin Anderson, Fred Beaulac (incumbent), Christina Carlsen, John Carroll (incumbent), Joseph Collins, Robert McCaslin,and Sam Wood. Incumbent Rustin Hall did not seek reappointment. �� c:: ��ok�ne �.11ey� qpplication Form for COi11i111$$�eS1�DaA'[1SICDfrifrilSS�D11S Return Completed form to City Clertc at City Hall, ��787 E. Sprague Ave. Suita 706 Spokane Valley,WA 99206 509-720-5�02 phone; 509-688-019a fax POSf710N APPZYING FQR: �/�N/4//N� C��{'l1/J9/��/O�t/ Applicant's nama(please print); �!�/ �- rt/,��,��p/�/ Applicant's Residence Address: ��z� �� J�� r�D�-�i9N�l��L�j/ �� Sfreet City �ip Code Applfcant`S Malllflg Addfe5s(i[difterent from Resldence address}: Sfreet City Zip Code Appiicant`s �mail: �7 ,5 G� j O/71 Home I'hone: ��—��C� Wor[c f'hone: -�r Cel6 f�hone:9��/Q� Length of time continuously lived within Spo[cane Va[ley City�imifs:�, �S ' _ _ :, ^?��i5�,�5, , _ - NQTE:You must be a res9dent of#he Cify of Spokane Vaffey fo participate on most boards,committees and commfssions. Gender:Female� Male� U,S. Citizen?�__„��.. Wa.State Registered voter? �� OYM�NT H�C}RY: � Present or last employer. ��'/ I'°��'✓�uGT.� o�-�ljf�G . _. �_. ._-- Position He1d��uFAG'T�/iZ/�tl� /��. Dates of Employment: /�'i l� ' �� Address: .� ° Vd� n� i � � /�.1�r L��t/� ,� " S Phone:�d��5-/l�// Previous Emp�oyer: ��Yfi �C�G.S �� - ��!l�.P> r = /�,a C_-o Position He�d:f�,e/1Ti0,t��"1� V/-� �,�I��/a�cAates of Employment: Address: �39�>a �, .�p,��,�,i . �;�„�ia,v� ,li�A ��a�? ,. Phone: .S�Y �� EDUCATIONAT�BACKGROUND: High School; /��'-�h` �7"�/��- Diploma: Yes � No � City/State Address �'�K/{ic�G-. � College/(Jni�ersity: �g�� /� �.1�/V��/ _. Degree�azned: NO�G City/State Address:. �/fC.��'y_ �?�"/,l CollegelCTniversity;�il�CiP�r�/ O,� �i/65/,�i�/<erp�r/ Degree Earned: �/L'.UG' City/State Address: ��T��_ G�iS� f.u� . .:.1i . ..�'�,Ic ��ii ,I� � , .. .. � . .-�i.�' , . �- , f..�� ;�t� ii,,. ;i��37, �' . �1� , I>.��,�rl;�!�; �.'�i Ili � � � COMMLTNITY RELATED ACI'IVPFiES,PAST&PRFSENT:{attach adciitiona[sheets iF necessary) �/l��'/J��7�/>��S lr��---irrO�r�� iv, rr�C �d.�� 4s ��tcf1 /f� ��, ��o�vG ��vr��,�r��, ��.v� /��i�'�iri�� ,��i-�T� T'O .�'�,�i� f��cv �,� �ir�, Co�i.e9,T-�, � ' -re%�C� DU ~ I79� '�: VOL[Fi�TTEER EXPBRIENCFS,PAST&PRESENT: /✓l�a� /�/�?� /��NG/C=�_ C�'_ d',�C?Cl��-.. � SP�CIAL SKCLIS/IIVTLRES'TS: C��c.c.tr � � � - 4 L'O/ ,E�C-/�C.V,� � « T,s �'l1G- 17D.(/S. ��/�VC- �l/I�G(�✓f�� L�/j'B;� �'�G1N�,D�i�'TJ�Nl� ��/�-y�Ds[/ �/ �,I� �7F��tJI!/,IGa�'. ��r� �c=�i�.v�� 1- �c��G.�' ��r7�.�v rr� Co,v��.��"r.I�� -- PAST OR�RESENT MEMBER OF'I`HL FOLLUWII�TG PROFESSIONAL,CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS OR GOVERNM�IT BOARDS,COMMTTTEES,OR COMMISSIONS; ��s� Committee Name City/State Committee Name City/State Committee Name City/State Whst do�rou feel you ran contribute to the aommunity that�nay not be eviden�t from i.n£ormation already furnished7 �')/ /7'l9'Tl��'il'.vC� �7ElGi�T"/4� d1��+�J�� T� �7"l/�ii/Gf�Y�G'TCl.�.a/aC/e� ��'�.�/�T'iel![_'7"/D/�/ CX��",�'/��— lG�� Gz9/GC.. e�.�4G/D� % �'"��iS//G�/�! /�v-��C'.�' T� 7�� G°t�/11/llr:�,/o.f/, Why do you feel you are qualified to act es a�nember of Fhe Board,Committee or Commission for whirh you are applying7 ��.�N �/�V�7�� /��'-�V 1�L'(//L:<[�/N�, /�,55'_/./�.�, �C7�GG �C��7 d� GCl�2G'rvT` ��'/�/.�.� . �7%�lJ.!/� S'Gf/✓.OD�7'�1'�, dG �i�'/�/�� G7°�G�'J'1/ ��G�!S��'S------- Would your appointment to thie position create a conflict of interest or an appearan�e of a confli�t of intereat7 /I�. � , , �..,,..:1i1', _�:�; ,;E !.� '�. ,�.�i f . I`, 3. .. -,o � I ....��f�. , �.li-,�:,oi!315�� . �il . . . il:. ;��3 ///�f-�/�, Signature Today's Date E.1'�._ ��7. -l� �::1� :��i , , i!1, ��l, .. .. � . ,��1' , . - ��i i'.Ut{.�f' i if _ ;VC'r�l`. � .. rlf _, ,�.i��l". _'i[E1 ,. , �� .� �� ..� � ,�� ,� � ` ��'��a..�.. . ��f��9 ��g�l �f�� ._ ... , ��rml��1��d�/��1�� Q�rxrh�ornplgf�d�o�m t�cEty�lerk ak CEfy NaII,'19 7'0y�,SFragu�Ave.Su!(�1�6 ' �pakana V�Ifey,wA 99�oa 508-72Q-5902 phpne; 6Q�-fi88-0'f9�fax �4siTI�A!�PPLYI�I(��9R• �lanning ��mf��to��r APA�fcant's name{p�e��efnf): I� �d � � I �pR�tcar,t�� s[ n A��res�. 3��.� Sund�wr� Dr �p�k�n�1/al��y �9�OE 5f[eef Gi�y Zip Codo AA�IfcenE'9 Mal�ing AddPess(if dlF(arant from RaB�denCa address); Stree C(f 7_!p Code Appticant's �malf; �,�,��g��(O�tt1�t7.CQITI _�fP�C��J�aU��C(.{(D' ��fl�(��P9��C�YfI_o_c_e—_ —� Nome A�Ona: Wo�4 phon6c Cal��hon� 3 Lenffii�of Ifine conilncrouelyltved�v1lhlr�Spokane Vatl�y C1iy Lfmlts; N07�;You mastbe a ra�jdahl of lit�Cfly of Spokahe Valiey to panfoipa[o on mosf baarcls,commEfiees and commisstons. �ender,l�em�fe� �Male� Y1.5.Citizen?.��g _, l�Sra.Sta�e�tegis�ered'�ot��'T 99 LMPLOYMI�NT 7�ISTO�t�': Present ox IasE e�7�ployer. Posirlon�eld: ��p bates oF�mploy�n�nt:��pi�� Address; - pl�o�te: 7 S3�p� ' �revtot�s}3Ynp�oy�r: ! Posi�ion l�Teld: Aares ofFmp�oynacnt: ,,� I' Addxess; I Phone: I I �nU�TroN�A�a3AcrcGxotrNb: �1ghSc}tooT: T'u5�lrt Unfotl �If fl S�hoot , bi�loma, 1'es � N'o� CiryjStsteAddreys. '7"usgin Ca..... Coltege/Universtry,��ange Coast,Goil�ge . ._.-_,_, be�r�e�asned:Y�� ,llf $, Cs rylScare Ad�trQSS: Co]Ie�e/�1'niversity; �a(�tate ��terton Degree�nrned:. Mg �e��r�ph� Major - G��.y/Sta�e Addr�,ss; �O�RBT�4,'1�3I��CIaVl°TI�SF S'.r�`!',�P�S�I',{otiac�pddi[ias�sl ai�eees fPuecessnrY� �. 1�r�n�ng �nr�m��l��p�r, �h� ��d�lr��i��ka��.11�lf�y_p��_ r��m ��f�ri^_.�_ , .��. �1'OI,UNT��t��SPtI�"CP�.9,PA,S',i'�s�'R�SBNT; . I�9ClITI��4d�VB�LdY�4��P �1�LlP� �4dp�P1� ghd d��PQ�o ��n�� p�� '� ��C��l�e . �� ha��d�arr�r��fi�� v�l� e h� ��I �b��h�od �6�� f� � c�m ��h��v� � uP$�CAS,�IC�,YaSIIN�'��t,�: �� . � 'i _�9�� a � �ou��fl, �uf�n�iv� �nawled � of c�tr�me��i�l �r�r�� ar��or�. ��in ��iv� i�� arnmunlEy g1v�s �t� �h��I�fac$1�� f Ecr�owing x�a�� m da�ng my�art 4v m��e ��°oz��sr��i�R 0��A'L�'Q P��SSIONAY,,�1CV�C OR�rA�i��T�9�'S�I� GO�RNM�T`�OA�I S,�9MMTIZ'E�,@R�OM�I7LSSY�I�T3; ' • �pokan�V�lfay �fanninc� �ommissivn � akane Va1�e Wa� Camm�ite�l�ama CiE�/State Ne_ Ighhorhflod C�mmitf��._,_o.�.-.,- --._._`_ ,_„ _ ��[�a�e V�)f�y W� CommittecIda�ne '-� . �� - City/S�ate � �oro�nitte2 iVatne City/StaCe �hat�o you#`�el you can con[�Ib�nre to Phe co�t�aley ehag�tay a��b��v�dent�ram,inYopma�fan AZxe�dy�I�e�7 �ur)n �'n r�vfou� g��zup��1�4{� g�� f��r�� omm��ivr� t ��es�in � in �iv� y�ar�, I do m��ur�t��a�y d��i�lar�� ! m�k��r� b��ed o� f�c��nd ��apch. �'hy dv yot�fcel yera a�a q�uaxi�acd�o nc�os A me�bex of�he Y�osrd,�ommit�ee vr Comt�t�sio�6�oY tiv��tcl��ou ere �,��ly�g7 ��' � �� $ � �r� I�� iV[ n �m 1 f��pp�int�d�a gY�� c�r�rrtil��la� 1 v�aoufd ��b�� ipou�i�� u��v �pe�d in � veYy �h�r�flm�, � �'outd y'aur nggoiRt�e��tb P�s pvsi�ia�c�ea[e a coa�Ilcz o�ia�e,�ese o��n�,p��rax�c�a�a coar�Iis�oPin�exe5t7 �� .�,'' /� _�y �-.� G�� /� � z�0 � Signature Today's Date II �.it�:c l `,�:c?!._ , !'�;,t , ',� i:� . , . .3 .,t? . . �, � �. . �;llli`. �'�� _. , . �� < � �ov � �3 ��}�7 k `µ�� , Spol�ane ��Va�ley$ L�-�Y�� t,��L�� ! Applica�ion Form for II CommitteeslBoardslCommissions Return Completed farm to City C�erk at City Hail, 11707 E. Sprague Ave. Suite 106 Spokane Vafley,WA 99206 509-720-5102 pho�e; 509-688-0194 fax POSfTION APPLYING FOR: � � Is�I �t� Yl?i /�'�;�[} t , . Appficant's name (please print): �� C��` �S Appiicant's Residence Address: � � � � �,,j� (�� f ��, S reet City zip Code � Appficani's Mall'ing Address (ii different from Residence address}; � Str� t City Zip Code Applicanf's Email: Home Phone�� ,� � 4 Work F'hon : Ce][ Phone: Length of time continuously lived within Spokane Valley City Limits: � � r NOT�:You must be a resident of the City of Spokane Valley fo participate on st boards, committees and commissions. Gender:FemaIe Maie� U.S. Citizen? Wa.5tate Registered voter? �L�YMENT HISTORY: resent r last employer: - Position Held: Dates of�m loyznent: �" � � � Address: - Phone: � -- `�� Previous Employer: - � � � . - � � Positzon Held: �1��1 14�rnpl yment: � � Address: — � Phone:�f�-� ��n..E��'�C� �� a�� ,��" EDiTCATIONAL BACKGROiTND: High 5chool: ' t� �� Diplorna; Yes � No � City/5tate Address � , j - / � College/University: L > Degree Earned: City/5tate alddress: College/Univezsity: 1 �� r Degree�arned: �� V'��L~ City/State Address: �� r� , r}��,` � �� '� C �E,l� �C.1�'.'�C�'., COMMUNITY RELATED ACT1VirIES,P &PRESENT: attach additional sheets if neressary) � � � � VOLUIV'�EER EXPERIENCES,PAST&PRESENT: C� � � SPECIA.L SKILL5/IIVTERESTS: �. �, i PAST OR PRESENT MEMBER OF THE FOLLOWING PROFESSIONAL,CIVIC ORGAIVIZATIONS OR GOVERNMENT BOARDS,COMMITIEES,OR COMNIISSIONS: �� .� Committee ame City/st te l J � � Committee Name City/State Committee Name City/State What do you feeZ you can contribute to the communiry that may not be evident from information already furnished7 � � _. Why do you feel you are qtzali.fied to act as a member of Yhe Board,Committee or Co�_�.sion for which you are applying7 , � •� � i Would your appointment to tivs posilaon create a conflict of interest or an appearance of a conflict of interest?1\S� - - �� , �� l � � � � � Community Related Activities, Past and Present and Volunteer Experiences, Past and Present ` (Questions 1 and 2] As President of the [nland Ernpire Dahlia Society, I ha�e had many opportunities to work with the public to provide educational information regarding the horticuEture of dahlia growing. 1 have organized many events and fundraisers,and worked with numerous cornrnittees to accomplis� the goals of the Society, As a member of the Board of Directors of the Society of Inland Northwest Environmental Scientists, I have had the opportunity to plan and schedu[e guest speakers as well as pro�ide educationa! occasions for school kids of all ages. i have voiunteered for Science Olympiad at the local and state level, assistEng students in their pro�ecfs, as well as judging e�ents. Special Skilfs/tnterests: As a professional as welf as a home educator, E have great tirne managernent skilks, as well as exceptional technological skills, [enjoy problem solving as welf as researching new topics. I strive to be a ]ife-long learner. I am an fPA Certified Trainer for Renovation, Repair and Painting, as we][as Dust Samp[ing Technician,and the Training Progra�-n Manager for Able Clean-up Technologies. While at�astern Washington Universfty, I was a Teacher's Assistant for the Geology and Environmentaf Science departments, assisting with teaching lab classes as wel[ as assisting in the field, As a student intern for the united States Geo[ogical Sur�ey, I was able to participate in the research of industrial minerals for scFentific publEcations. What do you feel you can contribute to the community that may not be evident from information already furnished? With my background in the environmental field i feel that I can contribute the knowledge 1 learned while at university as welf as the experience 1 have had working for an environmentaf services firm for nine years. I majored in geology with a secondary major in Environmental Science, with a dream of working in the natural hazard/planning/r-nitigation field. While a student at Eastern Washington Uni�ersity I began working with a local environmental services firrn, I �ave stayed at this position since 2003 and ha�e a variety of experience work�ng with hazardous materials,writing Environmental Site Assessments, and providing er-nergency response for environmental concerns. Why do you feel you are qualified to act as a member of the Board, Committee or Commission for which you are applying? I be[ieve that I am qualified for a position on the City of Spokane Valley Planning Commission because of my education and work history experience. My career in the en�ironrnental field has enabled me to be a tearn mem�er and project�-nanager on many occasions. [n my work experience, I have worked on projects for clients representing public utilities, private enterprise, as well as government agencies. I prirnarily research past and current[and use for environmental studies, inc[uding work with Phase I, II, and Ill Environmental Site Assessments. These projects begin as reports researching the historical and current uses of a Site, and often continue with slte specific sampling and analysis, and conc�ude with mitigation. I strive to ensure a safe and producti�e environment. � ., �� . _ �`�'ok.�r�� QV � � �a�z ` ��1�� K��E ��.�� Application Form #or CommitfieeslBoardslCommissions Return Completed form to City Clerk at City Hall, 1'[707 E. Sprague Ave. Suite 1Q6 Spokane Valley,WA 99206 509-720-5102 phone; 509-688-0194 fax P051TiON APPLYINC FOR: -� C,��`l �� '1r` `�`' (� �^ � Applicanfs name (please print): ?: . �}�'�$"� �.-�� C(4`��"U� � �� Appliaant's Residence Address: � �Lb� 4�„ ��C:��"t�.f��r"r°�� "� ��'��. �tr��:v��'�s��;�°1��t� ��7�3�� Streek Cify � Zip Code ApplicanYs Mailing Addres5 (ii different from Residence address): Street City Zip Code Applicant's Email �t��'g�7 �` ��3`l�.�c'C��lit'"��'�F°V�dC �"��.��t c 4 c . r.- cz � � �`�``��, c � Home Phone:�) ��,} �;�"7�- ��_� Worlc Phone:, ��r� �Z � W�� Cell F'hone: ��<.��C�,S�J LengEh of time cont[nuously lived within Spokane Valfey Cily l.imits: c��_ ( =c- €°9 ` NOTE: You musk be a resident of khe City of SpoKane Valley to partic[pate on m� st boards, committees and commissions. Gender: Female� Male� U.S, Citizen? �, � �� Wa. State Registered voter? ��'% .�� ,:..�� EMPLOYMENT HISTORY: � Present or last employer: ��t'�'°�/p ��:� �� "� �.�' �.,��'_C��'�i v�Cs ��. t".C'�1 i�.C:u�`:> PositionHeld: �iCi.��..�>��fe � ��.�1Ci.�',c'i�'� DatesofEmployment: `{/d��'�� -- �'�,�1,.�,.��„��- Address: ��%� �-�C�� fC1 � ��`Cti��: ��`1.if�1�' � l.c�f) �{�� Phone:��C�°� � 1��.. �,�,�� Previous�mployer: Position Held: Dates oF�mployment: Address: Phone: �DUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: High School: ��"d €'°r t L: ,�� F(! � 4 ,t Diploma: Yes � No � City/State Address �� ' . e ' '3 - College/University:_ ��_�^�-� �:�J'��G��'�:��1 �"� � Degree�arned: ��i��C��p�Cr:'�d �,� City/State Addxess: ___ ��"��,%i��f t',. , l��(,'`, CollegelLJniversity: __�.,��(�� _ Degree�arned:��:5 c��td�5'��f�?.� �� . City/State Address: ,��,.�� /�t?�,r�'.� , �:f� _ ��E� e . t �i> s 3 � - . . . .�!< < �, �.:E �, � �3 �3 _ _ � , . - � �� _ �`1�i'.�� j��.s__��r�) �� el1c��w.0 ��%"ce>�r�e�e;� ? _��, �r_ , L.�7�r��.�Z� � L,L'�Y � ,J ;' COMIVIUNTTY RE�ATED ACTIV��'IES,PAST 8t PRESENT:(attach additional sheets if necessary) �t� �> ��,-�' P�,�'7 � �, �� '#de� "�=° ��1��'"C��f.l� C� C1� .�" '�� .t� �izr:� C'f`�c�tr�� i�. �1��.� f i!�. .,y .�° C' F , fJ - r ,I _: >,� r��f/�) .f f! ° �'� �; �i �`� �� ?� (�, f � CrQ.IE��C,�LY�.:L�(_� W�UY (��.l. �t�r... C_��L.�',.�L�.L'�., � - - --- - .. .....---�------- VO�UNTEER EXPERIENCES,PAST&PRESENT: ; , , _ . . �-/�� ,d��F�� 31 � ' ,�`l� . � rjl"'�,..�'.�� E�f7e�`: : t� r�:t �1� ��'3 .-�'.t .�tf"l.'� d_:-��:� ;` s`., �i. F ` � r-' � .� 'P , . _,, . .� c: - � _� .��`JC.:�� f F �� ' 'CC..� �,i"1'� �f" _Y`" ��°.� C�:��1 tL�� f'�L', ` � -� t� �p { ��.�J�6"��-��3F'_ ��:a�� 'r�� `�)�.� /v k` .��,t��'-_��_f��.`C�r:j i.4�'�� -�-�--•-------�—�--- — SPEC�AL SKILLS/Il�TERESTS: , . . , � �.. .�t-- ,� �-� � C�? �� _ �:s �� - �f:�� e��fa_ :• G`` �� _.�.��_��-�` ��r��r-� , . �-� _� , ' 1, I' � �� - R .. �' �� ' �'. c:tr��c��^� ' % l � � �'.�c 1?� -, ��C`L� 7/� �7e�i`7��_ � �� 1, -��r° 1��c��.C �� '��J�-��1 ��5�. � < PAST OR PRESENT MEMBER OF TH�FQLLOWING PROFESSIONAL,CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS OR GOVERNMENT BOARDS, COMMITTEES,OR COMMISSIONS: C _)'` �.��' �' Ir`. 0°�`1� '., � � c ,,�._ �.. ��' � °�l�7 ��_��'E� �(�F�� Committee Name °- City State t s �d�C:�l J t r`` �t L4�` Co�ri ittee Narae City/State Committee Nart�e City/State What do you feel�rou can contribute to the comtnunity that may not be evident from iaformation alread�r furnished7 �7�f'r._f'lf2� �%l�'�.r L�1��) i"3")[2�s€�.f ��2I�'��.5 L?7� ��J)c'_. Li6ii �c'G��.�fGi_7L�<5� �1_��r'�_ J��I�, Lt,�rJ'��1 z.i_,�CCSC�� f7?c�,_,� {c� , �� `��.��;l;c�t��z.c; e�.t�c� ��r-��c�.ti�.��e�- ��/� �°��'e'��k_�t s ta`' t5��f�_��'��_/lt'r�._s.S��vI#�<��e-C1�a/l..c.E� `��i� �.r�fc�rir-�c�:5 s . i—� �f,��f"c'C`G%r�Y�1�' �r.� ��'�Pf1�.F�tS...� -`� f�ye� CL �jct�.� e�{° GCW71i�3r°J'°t,� 'dn�-� j�kC��f � c;�.. �L��I3L'.r�� tz�d<�zi � - G�.�" ' �� . . - r z 7 { �� L.•` .�f C� y�Gnt°' }�� L�[�vt�C`��1t5 e �'3�L:f� ��1t,.'> . >G7��L.�l��-C� J��LI_j� �, !?L.tP"��lii�2,s:.� tlracf... d3kffd'ttc� e'c:� (1'7 ._ti��1C:'/�t Cl G<,u'c'it� �_�'/I��c'�f��b�kf�ft- �1��2.Y�7`e��7'/«:.`� EE��f�/csr�,�tG�C_ ��f L�C.e��.�i��sE�x.�lc��rE�,' ;',.��,�x.c�sy�a� c:��`dr� �'cr��r.i`.lac��. Why do you feel you are qualified to act as�mernber of the Board,Committee oa�Coznmission for which you are a��iring� � p � , . , . _ � Cr°L:J77t})1:5<5lc�d1 b�1�..as°�.� ��i� E�.e�-i�.-�. ..� ��C<4�r��. !��.'�i"t t✓6�� '��1�� '��d"3!7/0'a� � '��^r.'7�)�"Gi��C,CL', _1�. �'7��d'g�.,, ��.(r�'��c� CJ!l �dt,er fe7f��. ��err�aa��C'r`1�fb'e; I��C'76'3 �r'J�ac�.�' r��, f � . . . ...,_._ _.,.__""'_"'__"'—"'__'--_ C`�� C�f:S �/t 1��1�.F)�`� C,"L o�-��, G�r�[c_��YtS Cr'F ��//7c t.� / 5�41«'�§ Would your appointment to this position create a conflict of iz�terest or an appearance of a conflict of interest7��;� . // 1� �/ I Sign re Taday's Date I � i , ��'ma�� 3�� Spokane : ��1� � G �� Valley� c��r�oF s��o�«�vr v�rL�� Application Form for CommitteeslBoardslCommissions Return Camplsted form#o Ci#y Clerk at CiEy Hafl, 11707 �. Sprague Ave. Suite 106 Spokane Valley,WA 992Q6 509-720-5102 phone; 505-668-0994 fax POSITtON APPLYING F'OR: ' ' � AppficanYs name (please printj: � 11`1,.� ApplEcant's Residence Address: t��t � , � �� 1(,h� U�� -�� ^r�.� Street City - Zip Code AppliCa�lt`s Mailing Add�e55 (if different from Resldence address}: , Streef City Zip Cade Applicant`s Email: �rv �i'1 � t�.�-�� `� � `�1 � r V�'1 Fiome Phone;� �Z��°�� Woric Phone: ��(�� Cel[ Phone: -�`�7 °��l Ler�gth of time contin�ously li�ed within Spokane Valley City Limits: �� t't1�-�S NOTE:Yo� must�e a resident of tne City of Spokane Valley to participate o most boards, committees and commissions. Gender: Female� Mal.e� . U.S. Citizen? � .� Wa. State Registered�oter? �" EMPLOYNiLNT HISTORY: /�� . Present or last emp�oyer: �� `Vt�-��(.�Q� 1,�Y1,LJ.�P�C�-�t',-�i l 7.�/t � �.�..( '��, ,, Position Held: �r°��, �g�t'�,,�"' ��}t�i'1,��!�� Dates of Employ�nent: ,�bC�� -� �pr�'��' � Address:_�.��._ �� a-�rs 1�_��''� 1Ild .rf� �'.n ! ,�(.�—�� '� Phone; �-° � � Pre�ious Employer:��L��S,_i� � ��}f�S �1 C��l�l Position Held: 1'�� Dates of Employanent: �l`�e`� �'r�� ,_,_,� Address: � `� � ��.� ( }�" � �, Phone:�� -� �' �DUCAT,IONAL BACKGROUND: High School: ��,.,�,�� „ _,_._ ,,_ Diploma: Yes � No � City/State Address .`��° n�_C�in�� Col�ege/University:�Q(��l�f�.��P_ �e_��i C1F-� �S-� Degree Earned:__ �(� _ City/State Address: College/University: Degree Earned: City/State Address; CommUnity related acti�ities, Past and present: I was�ice presfdent of the Inland Empire Hockey Association,we worked to ensure the safety and affordability of the hundreds of Va1ley and Spokane area kids playing the great sport of hoc#cey under the banner of fnland Empire "Warhorse" Hockey Volunteer experience past and present: � i am current[y a knight in the Knights of Columbus,We do fund rais3ng in several different ways to help the poor throughout the area and also hefp with youth sports throughout the Spokane and Eastern � Washington communities. We help organixe blood dri�es and other endea�ors for the Spokane area health and weil- being. 5peciaC skilEs: As a General contractor in the Spokane Valley for the past 1�years and in 5pokane County for the past 25 years f am especialEy adept at problem sol�ing. I primari�y act as a specialty contractor for the past 10 yea rs. Past or present member of the foflowing professional,Civlc organ�zations or Government Boards, committees or commissions: Cu�rent PC�, in Precinct ��6 in the 5pokane Valley. Current District Leader on the 5pokane County GOP Executive Board Representing the�oters of s�b-district 4-A. Spokane County Lincoln Day dinner fund-raising corrimittee 2012. What can I contrib�ate?And how am I Qua[ified? 1 am wefl�ersed in the land use, xoning and permitting process in the Valfey and other municipalities throughout the area. I have a great grasp of local rights and inherent heritage and culture of the Spokane Valfey area, having grown up in this area and living here all of my fife. We as Spokane Valley citizens need to strive to preserve our sovereign rights as outside influences continue to impose their w�l[ upon us and our chi�dren. Would youT appointment to this position create a confiict of interest or appearance of a conffict of interest? No, a[though f am a contractor, I do not do fand deve[opment personally,so there is no inherent confiict there. �f chosen for this position I would resign my position as District leader at this December's re- organization rrieeting. My PCO position is basicalEy to run my cauws and can see no posslble conflict there. Thank You for your consideration, Joe Colfins 1031� E, 6tn - — ,�r ,. , _... � •°'� �if / // t.� � �� -- Sig atttre Today's Date /l�/� E � � . dt. .. � ..li< . , �ir� �i;��il� ._�,�.€l .,1, z ,3f�11:E . ,. i � _€f�.:;{ , i�72:...;1�..<,, i-� . ,.. � I��EIVE� Spal�ane oc� � a �o'� ��lle�� CI°�Y O�SPOE<AN�VALL�Y Application Form for ' CommitteeslBoardslCommissio�� :e�=-� Refurn Completed form to City Clerk at City Hall, 11747 E. Sprague Ave. Suite 146 Spokane Valley,WA 99206 549-724-5102 phone; 549-688-0194 fax POSITION APP�YING FOR: l�� Pf an n�� '1 �0��. � 5S �0 Vl��` Applicant's name{p[ease print): �0�DPJ"'� t�. r�'1 C C�S�I V1 Applicant's Residence Address: -2.�� 0�� y��1�f ef�Op�GL � U{CGt�I� 1/aL� �,�a 3� Street ity Zip Code Applicant's Mailing Address (if diFfereni from ftesidence address): f I 1 Streef City Zip Code Applicanf's EmaE[:. A.5 besTdS s t,�i��c�.�J u a� q YY}�i� , CoIM, HomePhone: "�J��S�(— (3�I1 WorkPhone: SO`1-2ZS - 538(o CeIlPhone:Sc3`1--�a'-�-`jg3(o Length oF fime continuously Eived within Spokane Valley Cily Limits: � t PLi-rS NOTE: You must be a resident oF#he City of Spokane Valley to parlicipate o most boards, corrzrrzittees and commissions. Gender: Female� Male� U.S. Citizen? V�S Wa. State Registered voter? �1 e5 EMPLOYMENT HLSTORY: �} 1 j Present or last employer: l��V�"` rG�.i �� u0 � �E 5��'�C_� � �5� 1'osition Held: C�GLSS rvaY"� T�aG4�ev' Dates of Employment: � 9L�- �-D t`�°SG'n Address: ICL�v o 7 �. Cc�.�}-u� n ��,o kc�.e U�..L �.0 , U1 dtk a R n I b Phone: �oa— 2�8 --5�Eon Previous Employer: �V L V" «Y1 �C.�0 D� �f S T i'i C.� Position Held: G'�6iSS t'uo►'vti `[�i�aL�°c�r' Dates of Employment: g �3 �'D 6 R'--f- Address:3188 Qt,�'�,rnb�, Rc�.. �a.vt�bs�, CA �51�-[8 Phone: �o$-2 7 O--6 So0 EDUCATIONAI,BACKGj U� �t"� �'l S � � High School: �z.°�"�"ra LG G Oo Diploma: Yes � No � Ciry/State Address �Pa��°Yu-��.s , �N� �..... J ..._... ..._... .....__-- College/Universiry: WCi511 b ro1r� 5��,-�e U.h i ve rs� Degree Earned: `�• � ' City/State Address: Pu,��tm �N A College/Universiry: W� �`��,�IOrT�I �V1�tJP_-�rs�� Degree Earned: � `''�' A ' City/State Addzess: S Po4tti�E.W� �li(L`(}-i��)i).i�tlli=' �'�1��+_'i: ,'[�f�?�1C�i�i(111 iQl"��i1i17111i1iC€'S�i3ll;�f'i1C�L.�()t111�1�1i:.;':I��111.5 I3^'.!C � i3�., i I<ttit��,'t• :'(31(1 • COMM[JNi'TY RELATED ACI'IVTTFES,PAST&PRESENT:{attach additional sheets if necessary) a.sk r�nern.be_.v" -� i Wa.v�.i s C�u,b S o�Q 1�a�� VOLUNTEER��CLS,PAST&PRESFNT: C�r�e�►�,k vo ��.�.-�e.��r a.-}- s�oka.v+� L'owh.-�.�_��v�v�� a�� snov�so►� b� �e I1 { h� j J 1/Lti'1.lOV� �` vS P.t 1"LlS5�t9V1 ��jr �GC.�S SP�CIAL SICII�I.S RESTS: ` I ( g i� r�u.s i�ti a.v� ��r rrn Con cer�`s r i� c�,'t !,n c.c�1 l i�ra�-i�s bn6t��'� TL'YI riL5 YJ�P�f` PAST OR PRESENT MEMBER OF THE FOLLOWII�'G PROFFSSIONAL,CIVIC ORGANIZATI�NS OR GOVERNMENT BOARDS,COMMITTE�S,OR COMMISS�ONS: �( E� , w�R , C11�=L� T�c,�.ev-`s u,n.�en �.�w�.��` Saol�Cn.� VQ.�,�� f w 1� Committee Name W G�P�C� �a,r-�'iGi�aan.� City/StaYe Committee Name City/State Committee Na�ne _ City/State What ao you£eel yau�an contxiibute to the co�mtinity that may not be evident from information already fiurnished7 � hcure a a aor,l u1�riC e.�h.ic., �},�nd�. a.lwaus �ieeYc -�a C�.o rn.� la es`i i Y� rn,u �i�e �o�-e c�,v o r� . � a�s o a�wt. w i �.�i v�cr -�v � ��n.�stud� ax� +'�sec�.rc.�n � �`+�. o�� `{�,e -�-t--u�l� ��. � 9►„� s��-��. ,--� — --- Why do you feel you are qtf�lified to act as a member of the Boazd,Comam.ittee or Commission£ox which you are applying7 � �,.a�►e bp�v� Gt.TC 2v�d,LVW ��t�. l�t-� l-UU.v1.0 � I'Yl.�e��5 cV� P�G'��.wi� �mn2is5ie-n YYI.P�°�i vtc?S o 1r� a. reQ k�a.1� �as I 5 , 0.�.t�L. Gt�rh. V P�1'u ��i 4l ciX' vJ�'�"� h o� �J o� l�c�olr tc- � ' Wov2dyovr appointment to this position create a conflict o£interest ox an appearance of a conflict of`interest? N a . �'��.,- . t:,E�� . .1-.� . __, �. . i . . .___ .. .. _. .. -. . . ._ _ . . . !j /�J- � L� � `D ��o 'l �- � Signature Today's Date 'i � �I ,,,,, •� C-�ti�°r�i`��o,«ne� A�t] c�.� ,°l,�,y icali��i for{_t�ii�€�ttiff�.°:%C3«t�rus�'l�€>r3iut��;.�irri5 i �_ e, ;i u��.3 J�t�tt�,E��3}[_l � i � � ; r �o� ��: � �:��y� °� ry ��j�� ; � � �� ' ��pll��t��r� ��m f�� #��l��a�c��l��m�i��i��s I�ett�rn �ompI�teci #orrn fo �iiy C�et��c at Cify Half, 11707 E,Sprag��e Av�.Su€Ee 106 Spolcat�e V�IIey,1/VA 9�206 � �oa-72a-��o2phone; 509-�00-0'E�J4faK €'O�ITIOh1 AP�LYIN(3 �p{�; Planning commission ; Sam p Wood Ap�licartt's nar�e(please print): 1520 S David 8t Spokane VaZ1ey,Vla 99212 Applfcant's Re�itience Ac1E�rbsa; . __ ._. � Streot City zEp Gade Ap�licant'S M�Ifltlf�AC�C�fBSS(lf different fram Re�idence address}; Applicanf`5 ETTIc�I(; �ampwood�soundappraisalmgt.com Stre�t City zfp Cocfo 509-998-8323 Hon�e Pl�one: 509-533-0702 �O�k ��OClO: 509-534-2000 C�([�h0[�e; 27 years ', Lengtf�of ti�ne coftti�ifiously Iived.wi#hir�Spoka��e Valley C[�y l.imils: n�or�; Yot�musf he a resident oflho CIEy of Spokane Valfey to partieipa#e on most�oa�c�s; comm�Efees ai�c[ co�nt�t[ssions. Oender;�emale� Mrtle� U.S. Citizen7 YeS WA,Staee RegisEered voter7 Y�e EMPI:07'"ML�NT�-I�ST'QRY: Present or last employer: Self employed �SOUnd Appraisal and TVood and Wood Rea1Cy ' Pos,ftion IIe1d: Real Estate Appza9.ser T]ates of�smploy�nez�t: 1989-2012 Sam As Above 11`�ll.Ci(�1"0S S f 17�lOner 509-534-2000 Pt'eV�0USL7Itl�I(7y�K;. Washington Mutual Bank �pS�[�Ol] 1-�2�(�;. Real Estate mAppraser �at2S Of�YCi��pyri]Et�t. 1998 out af business ��[�Y2SS: -- .._�� .,..,...,,,,._....,_,_,_. Pho�ie; N/A �]]LTCATIQNAL AACKGROUND; I-�igh Seliool: Lewis and ciark Di�Ioma; �es � Na � City/St�te Address Spokane,PTa � College/Uziiversity: �wsU De�ree Ea��ed;_ Journaiism � C1tYIS�Ate�CI[�1'�&St. Cheney,bTa WSU ColIege/Unive��sity; Degi�ee Eai•nedc_ No ` � City/Stare.Add resst,_,�.... P"l lman i � [ ��.i{�°{}��ya�'bi>:�s�i1'it' ��it��C'V'�4�3f3�it:i�[1119) �F;i f�[�¢�Ill:#1��,!?'�;>'��:7:3.f�t��i�-[F117i?i1lYl(�IF'.-! ��ilj�'<". 'I fq�'P � �C1lil;ifi'�` ��)a�) � i CQMMIJ�VI`].'Y RELATED AC,"TI�ITIES,I'AST&�R�S�NT.(attacli Rdditio�i�I s}teets if ztecessary) Attend the church o� the Nazazene support City Gate and The UGTd/Rode in Spoke �est/ ; VOLLINTE�R EXP�RTENCES,PAST&1'R�SENT; Awana,Cub Scouts and am now a coach for the First Tee O� the Northwes�.. � Usher at Inter playera theatre —,�.� � SP�GIAL SKILLS/INTL?R�S7'S; Go1�,Fishing,Cycling i ' j �'�1ST OR.PR�SENT MEMB��OF'�HF PCILLO�VII\TG�'�O1��SSIONIIL,CIVIG OItGANI.Z:.�TIONS OR ; VOV�RNM�NT BQARDS,COIVIIVI�T'I'E�S,QR CQMMISSIQNS: i NAIFA {local chapter president) 9pokane,�9a Commtttee Name Gity/StRte Carnhope S4ater District tchai.rman) Spokane Va].ley,C^�a Com�r�itt�e Natrie City/St�te CDBG Community Development l�lock grant board {3 years) Spokane,t9a C�oYnmitkee Nakne Gity/StaCe , Vt�hat:clo you feel yo€t can conteibute to tl�e com��lti�iity tiiat inay noti be evident fro�n infozmation already fi�rnishecl7 i know this community and have lived in Spokane all my �iFe. � • F f � i S Vi�liy do you feel yotx nze c��talifiec�to actaa a member pf the�o�tiis Committee or Go��rmissian [`or tvliic}t you�re � a�a�}Iyitig7 T have been in the real esCate indus�.ry for over 23 years E , Would youx appa�atinent t.o th'is position c�-e�tte�conflict of interest Qr nn appearaYice of n co��f�i.ct,of inke�•est7 No : � io/29/ZOi2 Sign�zture Tod�y's DAte. � (�7t�'i}I'S�?v�;i9t��' 1�tsEl;�t°,E�3��f#i't,tt€3�j f.��C,�ciE�;a�litir�.`.w�`i4i?�tr�fi<�t�'��:�l�sri��;iiai�ti �'f;t�.:;? [�� .�«ti�is�1��•�'��t SOUnd Appraisal 1520 S. David �t Spokane VaIley, Wa.99212 509-534-2000 Cell: 509-998-8323 Email address:sampwood@soundappraisaimgt,com Professional Employment His�ory: 1989-Present Wood and Wood Rea�ty Owner/B�•oker � 1996�1998 Blue Apple Appx•aisals �' Certified Residential Appraiser 1998-2006 Washington Muhial Bank Certified Residential Appraiser 200b-2012 Sound Appraisal Management Ow�-ier/Cei�tified Appraiser Professional Associations: President of Local Chapter ofNAIFA Chairman of the Carnhope Water District Member of local MLS Education: 1965�1970 Undergraduate in Jou�•nalism WSU 1995-1996 BA in Journalism EWSU Licenses: Certified Residential Appraiser in Washington Real Estate B�•oker in tlze state of Wasl�ington Major Clients: Hon�e St�•eet Bantc Academy Moi-�gage American West Bank Eagle Home Mortgage Citimortgage LSI Landsafe Mann Mortgage Guild Mor�gage CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 12-11-2012 Department DirectorApproval: ❑ Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business � new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: City Hall Holiday Closure BACKGROUND: OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move to authorize the closure of City Hall and CenterPlace, for Monday, December 24, 2012 for the entire workday; and to remain open for the entire workday, Monday, December 31, 2012. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: John Whitehead ATTACHMENTS DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA For Planning Discussion Purposes Only as of December 6, 2012; 3:00 p.m. Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative To: Council & Staff From: City Clerk, by direction of City Manager Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings December 18,2012, Studv Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Dec 10] ACTION ITEM: 1. Motion Consideration: Approval of Legislative Agenda—Mike Jackson (15 minutes) NON-ACTION ITEMS: 2. CTA 04-12 Code Text Amendment—Marty Palaniuk (20 minutes) 3. Admin Report: Update on Development Projects—John Hohman (20 minutes) 4. Decant Feasibility Study—Eric Guth (20 minutes) 5. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 6. Info Only: (a) Department Reports; (b) Senske Contract Update 7. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Review Performance of Public Employee [RCW 4230110(1)(g)] [*estimated meeting: 80 minutes] December 25,2012.No meeting. Christmas week January 1,2013.No meetin�. New Year's Dav Januarv 8,2013,Formal Meetin�Format,6:00 n.m. [due Mon,Dec 31] Proclamation: Spokane T�alley's Tenth Anniversary;Human Ti^afficking Awareness Day 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. First Reading Proposed Ordinance, CTA 04-12 Code Text Amendment—Marty Palaniuk (20 minutes) 3. Motion Consideration: Interlocal Agreement re Decant Facility—Eric Guth (15 minutes) 4. Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 5. Information Only: Planning Commission Minutes [*estimated meeting: 45 minutes] Januarv 15,2013, Studv Session Format, 6:00 n.m. [due Mon,Jan 7] 1. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) January 22,2013,Formal Meetin�Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Jan 14] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll, minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance, CTA 04-12 Code Text Amendment—Marty Palaniuk (20 minutes) 3. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 4. Information Only: Dept Reports;Planning Commission Minutes [*estimated meeting: minutes] January 29,2013, Studv Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Jan 21] 1. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) February 5,2013,Studv Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Jan 28] 1. Accomplishments Report for 2012—Mike Jackson and Dept Directors (30 minutes) 2. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) Draft Advance Agenda 12/6/2012 ll:37:10 AM Page 1 of 2 Februarv 12,2013,Possible No MeetinQ(Citv Le�islative Action Conference fCLACI in Olvmpia) February 19,2013, Studv Session Meetin�Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Feb 11] 1. Advance Agenda 2. Info Only: Department Reports; Planning Commission Minutes Feb 26,2013 Winter Workshop (Note:no evenin�Council meezin�) 8:30a.m.S:OOp.m. City Hall Council Chambers Tentative Topics: Ten-Year Anniversary Work Plan 2013 Park/Library Update Manufactured Homes City Hall Council Goals Business Route Signage Legislative Agenda Solid Waste Council Meeting Processes City Funding Opportunities: Outside Agency;Lodging Ta� Thurs, Februarv, 28,2012(tentative) —Citv Hall at the Mall March 5,2013,Studv Session Format, 6:00 n.m. [due Mon,Feb 25] 1. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) March 12,2013,Formal Meetin�Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon March 4] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) March 19,2013, Studv Session Meetin�Format, 6:00 n.m. [due Mon,March 11] 1. Advance Agenda March 26,2013,Formal Meetin�Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,March 18] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll, minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Information Only: Dept Reports;Planning Commission Minutes OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: ADA Transition Plan Regional Transportation Issues Arts Council TIP (June, 2013) Bidding Contracts (SVMC 3.—bidding exceptions) CDBG(spring 2013) *time for public or Council comments not included Donation Policy Future Acquisition Areas Gateway, Regional MOU PEG Funds (Education) Public Safety Contract,Proposed Amendment Revenue Policy, Cost Recovery Solid Waste Analysis Speed Limits (overall system) Stormwater Projects Draft Advance Agenda 12/6/2012 ll:37:10 AM Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: Dec 11th, 2012 Department Director Approval: � Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing � information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2013 Quick Response Safety Grant Program GOVERNING LEGISLATION: n/a PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: none. BACKGROUND: On November 27th, WSDOT released the 2013 Quick Response Safety Program call for projects. This program offers $25 million statewide for construction of safety projects. The source of the funding is the federal Highway Safety Improvement Program from SAFET-LU and MAP-21. This is very similar to the 2011 program that is funding $1.36 million in safety improvements throughout our City. The goals of the 2013 program are 1) reduce fatal and serious collisions on local roads and streets, and 2) get safety projects on the ground quickly. The program funds only the construction phase of a project, and they must be construction ready by July 2013. There is no match requirement, but the City would need to fund the design work. Grant applications are due January 4`h, 2013. Staff has reviewed the program guidance and developed a short-list of projects that could be submitted. Several small projects can be combined into one citywide safety program as we did with the 2011 program. The design work for many of these projects can be done in-house, but others would require using City funds to pay for design or survey work. Citywide Safety Project II • Regulatory/Warning Sign Replacement — Staff is currently working on the preliminary engineering for the sign replacement work funded through the 2011 grant program. Many of the City's regulatory and warning signs are over 10 years old and losing their nighttime reflectivity. The 2011 funding will not replace all of the faded signs, so we could request additional funds to continue that program. • Traffic Calming — Staff is evaluating the grant criteria to see if traffic calming projects would be eligible. • Bike Lane Striping — Staff has a completed plan set to stripe bike lanes that may be eligible for construction through this program. Applewav Path On December 15`h staff will find out if the Appleway Path (University to Evergreen) made the short list for funding through the state bicycle and pedestrian grant program. If it does not make the list, we could consider applying for construction funds for this project. Staff is evaluating the grant criteria and timeline to determine if this project could be eligible. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: None. Staff will bring a discussion to Council on December 1 g`n BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Possible expenditures for design work. STAFF CONTACT: Inga Note, Senior Traffic Engineer; Eric Guth, Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: None CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 11, 2012 Department DirectorApproval � Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation � executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: EXECUTIVE SESSION: Review Performance of Public Employee [RCW 4230.110(1)(g)] GOVERNING LEGISLATION: [RCW 42.30.110(1)(g)] PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: "I Move that Council adjourn into executive session for approximately forty minutes to review the performance of a public employee, and that no action will be taken upon return to open session." BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: ATTACHMENTS: