The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 02/24/2011 ��TY�k�.n� � Valle � � Spokane Valley Planning Commission Agenda City Hall Council Chambers, 11707 E. Sprague Ave. February 24, 2011 6:00 p.m. L CALL TO ORDER IL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE IIL ROLL CALL IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: January 27, 2011 VL PUBLIC COMMENT: On any subject that is not on the agenda VIL COMMISSION REPORTS VIIL ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS OLD BUSINESS: CONTINUED DELIBERATION CTA-02-1 l,AMENDMENT TO THE ANIMAL KEEPING REGULATIONS,ALLOWING LIVESTOCK IN MIXED USE ZONES-ASSISTANT PLANNER CHRISTINA JANSSEN NEW BUSINESS: PUBLIC HEARING -ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS-SR.PLANNER MIKE BASINGER X. FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER XL ADJOURNMENT COMMISSIONERS CITY STAFF 70HN G. CARROLL,CHAIR KATHY MCCLUNG,CD DIRECTOR MARCIA SANDS,VICE CHAIR SCOTT KUHTA,PLANNING MGR,AICP BILL BATES MIKE BASINGER, SENIOR PLANNER,AICP RusTiN HaLL JoE Malvlv JoE STOY DEANNA GFUFFI� ARNE WOODARD WWW.SPOKANEVALLEY.ORG CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Planning Commission Review Meeting Date: February 24`h, 2011 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent � old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. Report ❑ pending legislation FILE NUMBER: CTA 02-11 AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Continued deliberations —Amendment to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code as follows: DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Chapter 19.40.150 (Animal raising and keeping) amending current regulations for the keeping livestock in areas of the City zoned Mixed Use. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A.106; SVMC 17.80.150 and 19.30.040 PREVIOUS PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: The Uniform Development Code was adopted in September of 2007 and was effective October 28`h, 2007. Following the adoption of the code, a number of items were discovered which were incorrect, impractical, or omitted. In September 2010, the Community Development Director received an Administrative Interpretation Request from citizen asking for clarification on zoning regulations for keeping livestock in the mixed use zones. A public hearing on this issue was held on February 10, 2011. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: No motion recommended at this time. STAFF CONTACT: Christina Janssen-Assistant Planner ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Administrative Interpretation Request Exhibit B: Map-Residential uses over 40,000 square feet in mixed use zones. . . ........... . ......... ......... ......... .. ... ... .. . .. ....... ....... .. .. . . .. .. . ... . ........ ....... ...... . I I .. ...... '.. P�&�� ADMINISTRATIVE INTERPRETATION �i� �pO�.ne REQU EST �� SVMC 17.50.010 � t Community Development- Planning Division 11703 E Sprague Ave Suite B-3 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 ; 509.720.5310 ♦ Fax: 509.688.0037 ♦ planningC�spokanevalley.org '� STAFF USE ONLY � I Date Submitted: Received by: Fee: �� , C`7C� � PLUS #: �d�b 2� `� ,S File#: � I -D3�117 ( i PART I - APPLICANT INFORMATION ! � � � i OWNER NAME: � i I MAILING ADDRESS: �� h � I CITY: ��,�.��,�` STATE:� ZIP: 1� �} \ �(�" , I� ��'� ' �'.R.l�° ' (� �I PHONE: FAX: CELL: (,� �j��-� EMAIL: �'�� ; � ��'IJ�� Vei ��U'v�C Y�'��-� Yl C,�- PART II - INTERPRETATION REQUEST i , TYPE OF REQUEST: � � SVMC � Zoning Map � Arterial Road Map [�; Prior Condition [� Prior interpretations � SITE ADDRESS: I ��C3 �C3�U�� " � Parcel No: �� 1�� ' I � � DESCRIBE IN DETAIL REQUEST AND REASON(S)WHY: (may included on separate sheet of paper) t-t�'i �v°��('�F- 1r�1 � � b cr��w�� l V1 c.1� __ � L,.�� I �l C°i ' � l.1 '� �� (�'br r ,v. � V�� (,�e, ��"�, � ��`��C��V1�� 1�.��/Ll C�1 1��'� ��t' Gvt t '1��,�v1 �'�� ' �� t�� -� it�1�✓�� t� � _ �L'�1��.�' �C7(� `f' � ' �" C� �� "� '`s'1�1 '�'�1� ,� �-��' _ PART III - AUTHORIZATION � I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY ME IS TRUE AND C ECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. `� .� Owner/Applicant Signature Date I INFORMATION FOR OWNER:After submittal of the application,the Community Development Director has up to two(2)weeks to issue I a decision. All decisions are appealable pursuant to Chapter 17.90 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC). � I � Page 1 of 1 � REVISED 1/27/10 'I I , ....,... �..St... , . , ,_—_r � �.. �_�.-'''. _.� �� t.,a � � � l — � � , I' �� _ —./ � —� , � # � � .=� , — � � ��,. Cih-of Millwood �� . .. / ,=:,,, -� - �� :. '"'�' . �� / � � .` L �� ; �-- � s'3=�'� � ��.�.w..zw�__ �-��LI� � � i � � � o �� , � ��m - � �� '� �� Y �`: City of Spokaue �[� � ��gy �� ,,�� r � � �p�� w� � � �° � Ci[y of Liber[y Lake %�ot��L�o�� q ^^.,.� � � � � `a_fILJ �� _ P.�`: If I o� . �. .,_. y� e � �- � ..ni'. � �� r � �� . _ � � �� e t � �� + � � � �� ' LL + � � �o�m��mc, � ��°e�� µr1111� II � � � � �� ,� � �� tiom aa�� a� ��u� °� �a _ � °�I��_ ��ra�❑�� ❑ ��owu�� _ �m �_ �� a��gy�� .. �- � �� m�� ^� ��❑ r� � �� o �� a �� v�� Valley Residential Parcels � _ �� MisedUseZoning>=40,OOOsqB N �� -Single Family Residential � �,-^.; - Valley Parcels CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Planning Commission Review Meeting Date: February 24, 2011 Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business � public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2011 Comprehensive Plan Amendments— Public Hearing PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: The Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan includes an annual amendment cycle that runs from November 2nd to November 15t of the following year. Applications received prior to November 15t are considered by the Planning Commission in late winter/early spring of the following year, with a decision by City Council in late spring/early summer. The Planning Commission will review the following Comprehensive Plan Amendments (CPAs) and make a recommendation to City Council by the end of March. City Council may choose to adopt the individual amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission, disapprove the amendments, or modify and adopt the proposal. If the Council chooses to modify a proposal, they must either conduct a public hearing or refer the proposal back to the Planning Commission for further consideration. All parts of the Comprehensive Plan can be amended during the annual cycle. The Community Development Department received two requests for site-specific Comprehensive Plan amendments for 2011. Sites approved for a Comprehensive Plan amendment will automatically receive a zoning designation consistent with the new land use designation. The 2011 Comprehensive Plan text amendments include amendments to five Comprehensive Plan Elements: Chapter 2 - Land Use, Chapter 3—Transportation, Chapter 4—Capital Facilities and Public Services, Chapter 7— Economic Development, and Chapter 8— Natural Environment. The amendments may also entail minor changes to other elements referencing the proposed amendments. NOTICE: Notice for the proposed amendments was placed in the Spokane Valley News Herald on February 4, 2011 and each site was posted with a "Notice of Public Hearing" sign, with a description of the proposal. Individual notice of the proposals was mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of each amendment. SEPA REVIEW Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA— RCW 43.21C) environmental checklists were required for each proposed comprehensive plan amendments. Under SEPA, amendments to the comprehensive plan 1of2 are considered "non-project actions" defined as actions involving decisions on policies, plans, or programs that contain standards controlling use or modification of the environment. Additional environmental review may be required for the physical development of the subject properties. Staff reviewed the environmental checklists and a threshold determination was made for each proposed comprehensive plan amendment. Determinations of Non-significance (DNS) were issued for the proposed amendments on February 4, 2011 consistent with the City of Spokane Valley Environmental Ordinance. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PROPOSALS: Comprehensive plan amendment proposals are organized into individual reports consisting of application materials, staff reports, comprehensive plan maps, zoning maps, aerial maps, vicinity maps, transportation maps, and comments submitted to date to assist the Commission's review. RECOMMENDED MOTION(S): CPA-01-11 (Propress Road and Sprapue Avenue) 1 move the Planning Commission finds CPA-01-11 to be consistent with Section 17.80.140 (HJ of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). The Planning Commission adopts the findings in the staff report and recommends approval of CPA-01-11, a change to Neighborhood Center (NC) with a subsequent zone change to Neighborhood Center(NC) to the City Council. CPA-02-11 (503 North Walnut Road) 1 move the Planning Commission finds CPA-02-11 to be consistent with Section 17.80.140 (H) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMCJ. The Planning Commission adopts the findings in the staff report and recommends approval of CPA-02-11, change to Medium Density Residential (MDRJ with a subsequent zone change to Multifamily Medium Density Residential District(MF-1) to the City Council. CPA-03-11 (Sprapue Appleway Subarea Plan) No recommendation is provided. The Planning Commission should consider the information within the staff report and discuss the merits of eliminating the plan as it relates to the public health and welfare of the community. The Commission should forward their recommendation, along with findings of fact to the Council for their consideration. CPA-04-11 throuph CPA-08-11 (Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments) 1 move the Planning Commission finds the 2011 Comprehensive Plan text amendments CPA-04-11 through CPA-08-11 to be consistent with Section 17.80.140 (H) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). The Planning Commission adopts the findings in the staff report and recommends approval of CPA-04-11 through CPA-08-11, to the City Council. STAFF CONTACT: Mike Basinger, AICP, Senior Planner ATTAC H M E NTS: Individual Staff Reports and Planning Commission Findings 2of2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION �`pokane STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE ��T��1�� PLANNING COMMISSION CPA-01-11 STAFF REPORT DATE: Febi'uaI'y 16, 2011 HEax�NG DaTE AN� LocaT�oN: February 24, 2011, beginning at 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers, Valley Redwood Plaza Building, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 101, Spokane Valley, Washington 99206. PROPOSAL DESCxiPTroN: Site-specific comprehensive plan map amendment to change the designation on parcels 45321.0109, 45231.0210, 45231.0211, 45231.0212, 45231.0213, 45231.0214, 45231.0216, 45231.0218, 45231.0224 and 45231.0226 from Mixed Use Avenue (MUA) to Neighborhood Center (NCT) comprehensive plan and zoning designation. PROrosAL LocATioN: Parcels 45321.0109, 45231.0210, 45231.021 l, 45231.0212, 45231.0213, 45231.0214, 45231.0216, 45231.0218, 45231.0224 and 45231.0226; located on the southeast corner of Progress Road and Sprague Avenue; further located in the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 23, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. OwNER/APPL�cANT:John Hultman, Hultman Family Trust, LLC & SET LLC; 3876 East Aphrodite Ct; Boise, ID 83716 OwNEx oF PARCEL 45231.0114: Matt Jankowski; 315 West Riverside, Suite 302; Spokane, WA 99201 OwNEx oF PaxcEL 45231.0215: Judy Soucy; 15121 East lst Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 990037 APPL�cANTS REPxESENTATrvE: Dwight Hume; 9101 North Mt. View Lane; Spokane, WA 99218 APPROVAL CRiTEiva: Chapter 2 (Urban Land Use) of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Title 17 (General Provision), Title 19 (Zoning Regulations), and Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION: Tl1e Planning Division, after review and consideration of the submitted application and applicable approval criteria, recommends that the Planning Commission approve CPA-01-11 subject to incorporating parcels 45231.0114 and 45321.0215 as part of the amendment. STAFF PLANNER: Karen Kendall, Assistant Planner, Community Development Department �v1EwEn By: Scott Kuhta, AICP,Planning Manager, Community Development Department ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Comprehensive Plan Map Exhibit 2 Zoning Map Exhibit 3: 2009 Aerial Map Exhibit 4: Vicinity Map StaffReport and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-01-11 Page 1 of 7 Exhibit 5: Transportation Map Exhibit 6: Application Submittal Exhibit 7: SEPA Determination L BACKGROUND INFORMATION APPL�cAT�oN PxocESS�NG: Chapter 17.80 Permit Processing Procedures in the Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC). The following summarizes key application procedures for the proposal. Pre-Application Meeting: October 13, 2010 Application Submitted: November l, 2010 Determination of Completeness: November l, 2010 Issuance of Determination of Non-Significance(DNS): February 4, 2011 End of Appeal Period for DNS: February 18, 2011 Date of Published Notice of Public Hearing February 4, 2011 Date of Mailed Notice of Public Hearing: February 9, 2011 PROPERTY INFORMATION: Size and Characteristics: The site is approximately 4.57 acres in size. The SEPA checklist states the site is flat. Comprehensive Plan: Mixed Use Avenue Zoning: Mixed Use Avenue Existing Land Use: There is a multiple occupancy building with office, shoe repair, restaurant and lock smith, post office, tire repair and six (6) single family dwelling on the subject parcels. SURROUNDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN,ZONING,AND LAND USES: North Comprehensive Plan—Neighborhood Center(NCT) and Mixed Use Avenue (MUA) Zoning—Neighborhood Center and Mixed Use Avenue Existing Land Uses —Church, restaurant, fitness center, bank and vacant building South Comprehensive Plan—Mixed Use Avenue (MUA) and Community Boulevard (CB) Zoning—Mixed Use Avenue (MUA) and Community Boulevard (CB) Existing Land Uses —Single family residences East Comprehensive Plan—Neighborhood Center(NCT) Zoning—Neighborhood Center(NCT) Existing Land Uses —Multiple retail complex with restaurants and bank West Comprehensive Plan—Mixed Use Avenue(MUA) and Community Boulevard (CB) Zoning—Mixed Use Avenue (MUA) and Community Boulevard (CB) Existing Land Uses —Car lot, retail uses and single-family residences II. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA Findings: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC), the lead agency has determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 4321C.030(2)(c). The Planning Division issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) for the proposal. This decision StaffReport and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-01-11 Page 2 of 7 was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Conclusion(s): The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act and Title 21 of the SVMC have been fulfilled by the applicant's submittal of the required SEPA Checklist, and the issuance of the City's threshold determination consisting of a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). No appeals were received. IIL FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT A. COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE 17 (GENERAL PROVISIONS) OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE Findings: Section 17.80.140 H. (Com�rehensive Plan Amendment A�roval Criteria) S�okane Vallev Munici�al Code 1. The City may approve Comprehensive Plan amendments and area-wide zone map amendments if it finds that(analysis is italicized): a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; Staff Comment: The City's adopted policies of the Comprehensive Plan state in part "the economic development strategy is to promote a more diverse economy [thatJ would achieve a better balance between jobs, housing and support the City's desired quality of life" (Section 2.3.1). The site-specific amendment offers additional opportunities to achieve the balance by expanding the land use available for further diverse development. b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; Staff Comment: The proposed location is served by all necessary urban services and provides for appropriate in-fill development within the City of Spokane T�alley. The City has adopted development regulations that are designed to address specific impacts related to new development such as off-street parking, landscaping, lighting, setbacks, and height. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Growth Management Act. Adjacent land use designations are consistent with the proposed amendment. The current amendment does not include two (2)parcels (45231.0114 and 45321.021 S) located to the east and south of the proposal. Staff finds the two (2)parcels should be included in the site-specific amendment to prevent islands of Mixed Use Avenue (MUA) surrounded by Neighborhood Center (NCT). The applicant, Dwight Hume, has contacted each property owner by mail requesting consent to include their parcel into the amendment. As of the date of this report, staff has spoken with the property owner of parcel 45231.0114 Matt Jankowski (KFC restaurant), however no direction was given to staff. c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; Staff Comment: The site-specific amendment is not responding to a change in conditions. StaffReport and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-01-11 Page 3 of 7 d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or Staff Comment: The site-specific amendment does not correct a mapping error. e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Staff Comment: The site-specific amendment does not address an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The City must also consider the following factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan amendments: a. The effect upon the physical environment; Staff Comment: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the City of Spokane T�alley Uniform Development Code, the lead agency has determined that this amendment does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. The comprehensive plan amendment is a non project action under SEPA. At the time of the submittal of the building permit application, an additional SEPA review may be required to evaluate the impacts of the use(s) and proposed structure(s) on the physical environment. b. The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes; Staff Comment: The SEPA checklist states that there is no surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity ofsite. c. The compatibiliry with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; Staff Comment: The site-specific amendment is contiguous to a Neighborhood Commercial Comprehensive Plan designation. The uses currently in operation on the subject parcels are convenient and within close proximity to serve the surrounding neighborhood. At the time of future development, standards in Title 22 (Design and Development Standards), specifically 22.70 (Fencing, Screening, and Landscaping) will reduce impacts on adjacent low density residential designated properties. d. The adequacy of and impact on communiry facilities including utilities, roads,public transportation,parks, recreation, and schools; Staff Comment: The City of Spokane T�alley addresses adequacy of community facilities on a citywide basis through capital facilities planning. Policy CFP-9.1 of the Comprehensive Plan recommends a concurrency management system for transportation, sewer, and water facilities. The City of Spokane T�alley's Parks and Recreation Plan outlines an implementation strategy including a capital facilities plan, which identifies costs and revenue sources for new parks. At the time of development, the proposed amendment may have an impact on transportation. All subject parcels are developed, however at the time of the future development staff will evaluate the impacts of the use(s) and proposed structure(s) on the physical environment in regards to transportation. e. The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region; Staff Comment: The amendment is consistent with the existing character of the neighborhood. The parcels proposed to change are in a neighborhood that has existing commercial/industrial uses on three (3)sides and single family residences to the south. StaffReport and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-01-11 Page 4 of 7 £ The quantiry and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land; Staff Comment: The site-specific amendment is approximately 4.57 acres in size and has a variety of commercial uses and six (6)single family residences. The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will have minimal impact on other aspects of the plan. g. The current and projected population density in the area; and Staff Comment: The site-specific amendment will not increase the population density. The proposed comprehensive plan amendment does not demand population analysis. h. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. Staff Comment: The site-specific amendment as proposed to be modified by staff will be consistent with the comprehensive plan and will have minimal impact on other aspects of the plan. The applicant, Dwight Hume, has contacted each property owner by mail requesting consent to include their parcel into the amendment. As of the date of this report, staff has spoken w ith the property owner of parcel 45231.0114 Matt.Iankowski (KF'C restaurant), however no decision has been made. B. COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE 19 (ZONING REGULATIONS) OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE Findings: Section 19.60.040 (Neighborhood Commercial District) S�okane Vallev Munici�al Code The Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment is from Mixed Use Avenue (MUA) to Neighborhood Center (NCT) comprehensive plan and zoning designation. The Neighborhood Commercial designation is intended to provide a limited number of commercial goods and services to surrounding residential neighborhoods. Conclusion(s): The proposed site-specific amendment is contiguous to Neighborhood Commercial properties and will provide a wider variety of commercial uses. At the time of development, standards in Title 22 (Design and Development Standards), specifically 22.70 (Fencing, Screening, and Landscaping)will reduce impacts on adjacent low density residential designated properties by providing visual separation and physical buffers between land uses. Any future development would be consistent with the intention of the Neighborhood Commercial designation. C. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Comprehensive plan states that the Neighborhood Commercial designation provides areas for small- scale neighborhoods serving retail and office uses located in clustered development. 1. LUG-4 of the Comprehensive Plan recommends providing neighborhood and communiry scale retail centers for the City's neighborhoods. Staff Comment: The Neighborhood Commercial designation is consistent with the surrounding neighborhood. There is public transportation route along Sprague Avenue adjacent to the proposed amendment. StaffReport and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-01-11 Page 5 of 7 2. LUP-4.4 of the Comprehensive Plan encourages the integration of retail developments into surrounding residential areas. Staff Comment: The Neighborhood Commercial designation will allow the introduction of a variety of commercial uses that would service the surrounding residential neighborhood. D. PUBLIC FACILITIES Findings: The property is currently served with public water and sewer. Progress Road designated as a local access street and Sprague Avenue designated as a principal urban arterial provide access as indicated in the Arterial Street Plan (Exhibit 5). E. FINDING AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO PUBLIC COMMENTS Findings: Staff has received no public comment concerning the proposal to date. Conclusion(s): Adequate public noticing was conducted for CPA-01-11 in accordance with adopted public noticing procedures. F. FINDING AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO AGENCY COMMENTS Findings: Staff has received no agency comments to date. Conclusion(s): No concerns are noted. IV. OVERALL CONCLUSION The proposed Comprehensive Plan designation to Neighborhood Commercial and change in zoning classification to NCT is consistent with the Comprehensive Plans policies and goals. V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Planning Division after review and consideration of the submitted application and applicable approval criteria recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approve CPA-01-11 subject to incorporating parcels 45231.0114 and 45321.0215 as part of the amendment. Planning Commission Findings and Factors (Section 17180140H of the SVMC): Findin�s a. The public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment is furthered by ensuring economic diversity and a better balance between jobs, housing and support of the City's desired quality of life. b. The proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are consistent with Chapter 36.70A RCW (Growth Management Act). c. The proposed amendment is not responding to a change in conditions. d. The proposed amendment does not correct a mapping error. StaffReport and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-01-11 Page 6 of 7 e. The proposed amendment does not address an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Factors: a. Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the City of Spokane Valley Municipal Code, the lead agency has determined that the proposed amendment does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. b. The proposed amendment is a non-project amendment and will not affect open space, streams, rivers, and lakes. c. The proposed amendment is contiguous to neighborhood center, mixed use avenue and low density residential properties. Any potential impact to adjacent properties will be addressed during the development of the property and can be mitigated with design and development standards. d. Future development of the site may impact traffic in the area. At the time of development, an additional SEPA review will be required to evaluate the impacts of increased traffic. e. The proposal is consistent with the character of the neighborhood and will provide a wider array of commercial uses serving the neighborhood. f. The proposed amendment will not increase population densities and does not demand population analysis. g. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will have minimal impact on other aspects of the plan. Recommended Motion: The Planning Commission finds CPA-01-11 to be consistent with Section 17.80.140 (H) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). The Planning Commission adopts the findings in the staff report and recommends approval of CPA-Ol-11, a change to Neighborhood Commercial with a subsequent zone change to Neighborhood Commercial (NC). StaffReport and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-01-11 Page 7 of 7 Comprehensive Plan Map ` �\ � � � a � � � � � � cPa-oi-li Sprague , ` ��B lst :� 2� 2nd 2nd , � � � � � �z � CPA-Ol-11 Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map City of Spokane Valley designation from MUA to NCT; subsequent zoning Community Development Department change from MUA to NCT. Zoning Map �\��,��\�� \ � � � � :� :\ � �, ,� cPa-oi-ii \;; �\ � �st �� ,�-�-�- �-,s.. :� � /��w 2nd 2nd � � � � � Uv°� � CPA-01-11 Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map City of Spokane Valley designation from MUA to NCT; subsequent zoning Community Development Department change from MUA to NCT. 2009 Aerial Map , k �y -_- . i , i•��+ i N _ _. -�. .i. . r _ .' t '' �r � 1�r u. �. � . �, G�t,. � _:� �' � 'r-�;i fi : �• i•' y, �p '� ',' � ,� ;� � � _3 �-�t� �R� T � �,� I ��. .M� . '"�* � � I � f� `� � �;,� r �� ,� �s�_ - ' �-tt'' I w . Je� _ � ' "' . � : i�.r �: � a .n T F �� -� v.; ,�. ,� � � ' . k' r'" u�` r� . � t � :�gd _ M e `—a �r_�i= - - r' � - - �. � � , i� � � _.�� '��, � ':�h^ � � , _ �.— _ , ��- +�Ff S�.r xI � �, � o •5 f " �' � < , � . � � � , � � �� 5r� �.. �'" �,3 �- �"��^� r . �� r�� Pa ' � . • . , � ",,� � � ,�, Riverside � , . .�. �+M_i � i� !:'4 ' . ;a - � 8 . . . .f .� —� J �.+•, � , � - � _ , -� ' � . . ' s `- � i.. h h� .. # f¢ _- e� , : _. . � � ^ �,.s � k ,.�—� I �� _ �� ,��Rif9�l9�� t�r� . }r i� = ' � I�'�'r" '�A� . n �� - � � �{� _ � � �� .n�__ � � � � , � � _ - .. � �i �� I � � � � � - ' � � ' ,» _ . � -. �i� � I� - � �. � � o.. �. �, ___��' f �' _ � �_ t � {��'-�� - a �i ; ?�. � ,�'' `^�`�I a "r� f. �'� .�. . - � -� • � ' • �. '�- �� f'`��r,i.�� , - . . rsid e .;r: 6 . �. Rive .. 2 � ._ - -. , . � � �' a r_�ri } h j 1 ,�'y 4 " d' +� � � .. �a r� ��'+r+ , 4 . , ��, , �� _ ��,:�+�_� ��.� '+" � ' y � . � u� . on r,' _ - f* o ' � ,� .! '�I�k'��i . i.' .e "r-f4:F'�+ �R�'�.fi .� - a . r.��*� � -- r;�,�� r� � � °� G'`. � � � � r'„� � f4�.� 1 � y � .. � � , '� . r � r r�1 ,� � � Y�. ' ,� r�'�'�� "�``^ � �_ �* �� _ � i�� - - . a .9 - - . . — . -� M L, 4 I . � ' ' _ _. : _ ��,r C'�, T.t F��/ 5 ^� ,i� . " .. I I�� ' �-�'�y��' ,.. ' i.F,-�° �J. � . , r. . � ' '4 r - r . r � .. � ' ' __ " " ` J-! �. . �a _ . d. le, . . Sprague Sprague Sprague � - •� - ._ ` �'� ' -� - ' � .M�. _ , � - .... � ��r _��"_' �''�`�"� � Tf;�' �� - - r� � �p1 � �, � _ _ � � � o � � � ' y�� A . �^ �F � — _ . .�.._ �� R' . . � �' ,_ � .- ,�, aa � � '� _ � - . , �" �� ;. �: � � � � � i � ' = �' � � �r _ � � . , , . <� r�� , � � ' . . � _ : , y F, _� E . ' , a. - ,°' " � � � � ; . �� ,',�; .�b �4' -: st '�".`� r<<:r ' � �', I M' �`�r � ' �'� . , °�r :� . � ��• �� y.� � �: CPA�O1�11 � � :.� f • f '" A xl� 'F � `!�� ' � �� w�l '�� _ r . _ -.t `� . . � ��; �i ",�� . � ;�'�' � � �� ,:.�"� �"r �`3;� -�ir`-1 � �. �� . y F �! - °� � ��, .�. f +"�^�._�I�� .�� y.s. . . .�.;... �, �:p�"p�' f#�l4.� �:. ''� � .�� _ .. , _ . . — �.�. ..� lY�_ �� AA h#' p-I "�° r l��li.r �'�L�t y _3 ��-.� ' " ,e,e�� 9 F 1 �� $,— � - ;' �',��.< <' T' "t � t •.i` �+i V'�'}* �"i t' �Y . �r �y� '��F '� '�' �` ? r-�:!° �' ��r - �,��.�'' � ' � ,�: �rt,��' ',�"�'�,�-�--.� I��'�`� d�.,l�.� � �i�- �� , r �'-��.� +��'{ y i - 2nd - - �2nd�-�r �4i r �� 2nd� .•�4-�,��`2nd � �2nd� � �-.`��w' _ . r .�,.�. � i , , � �+M r f � :.�++ s'", �,�°' �� `1 , ±�� ., :•� _ ��'� r � �..Y;,.,��' `� �..i .,.�'��`T ��-�a'� ,Z 2ndl� ^�' " �' _ .� �`' � M r . �r� _ a� ; ��4�� ! i � 4 � �.�ri�bk�, _ �4 �'''�� '� J J,,, ��: �' , '`�" '�+�'��. a---f�' $ r-, � �„�� -,�r�. ..�.'� -� r� _�. � .�_. .��_ v��"��',i�'1�� . . � �� - , _,�.� ��F ,..e��±� � -� �� ' ,�� !4 �`4 `" � �,t �'��d"�`�Z . i �� -y�'�� r y ��:� � ��3� �t�` ' -,b�D � ,�'�.,1 ��.t�°�'.,..,ae�=_" �' — "- _ fi e�'rfr �y � .!- ��„ �� ::�,F � t �p � '� , . �„r,;�,� o�e, �- � � � ;r�� : � _ � ' � � , � � �� . _. 'C i � � � _ � .. '� t. . .� �� ,-�� __� r �� }-r��..r�� • �� _�.��` � k�� a� - C/1 ,,.,� � _ �a',r ,.,, x,�'�� p�„� - .�° �� T � L � k L�� ,� � .�r,� �� r� 4�. r�` �� • "� ' ��`� �Y �' �`��d ��' }�e —�I ,�� . . � � ,yi�r � �. �_�'�'.. ,�x� . �.�r P �3� .. ..#r �� ° "��M `� 4f-� � �c� �l �� -. �Is�� -�- 4th" � • 4th 4t11 �' 4th ' �� ' _4th ,�- �yt+ 4th a _ �' _ _-.ie � �� Y-� '...`.:� r..r CPA-Ol-11 Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map City of Spokane Valley designation from MUA to NCT; subsequent zoning Community Development Department change from MUA to NCT. Vicinity Map �Progress � Elementaiy � � Pioneer and Spr-ing€ield , Rainbow Alki Alki � � �U a bL O � � a G b � � � � V311eyW8y Ualleyway Ual.leyway � Nixon � � � U �� > U � Main � ,� Riverside � � o CPL�-�1-11 a Sprague Sprague Sprague 1 st � � > i� 2nd `�' � 2-nd b � � � ;� '� St 1VZary's � � � � 3r.d � Gq � U 0.' � 4th 4th 4th � �� —� 3 � r °J � z c�ys�iJ s�n � s�n � � � � � 6� 6� � > � � � U Century �� Adams � a�as Elementaiy �� a � 8t�h 8th �' 8th CPA-Ol-11 Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map City of Spokane Valley designation from MUA to NCT; subsequent zoning Community Development Department change from MUA to NCT. Transportation Map � Progress Elementary Springfield Pioneer and Rainbow A1ki alki A1ki � � U. � � �Q � � � Valleyway � Valley_way � � Nixon � Nixon � �5� � Rivexside � � U �� U Main vi Riverside Riverside Sprague � � � � � a � � lst 2nd 2nd CPA-01-11 ; � 2nd � �� St Mary's " ° z' � � � �3rd �q U � 4th � Legend �� Sth Current Classification z State ar Federal Principal Arterial 6th � 6th Minor Arterial ',� Collector ' �° — — • Proposed Principal Arterial ��as � ° Proposed Minar Arterial dams Elementary � � — — • Proposed Collector v 8th CPA-01-11 Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map City of Spokane Valley designation from MUA to NCT; subsequent zoning Community Development Department change from MUA to NCT. rn��uF� CITY UF SPOKANE V►4LLEY (For StafF Use dniy] �� Cvmi�unity ❑evelopment DATE SUBMITT�D: �l f I R�c��►rEn sv. � �� Department + � i 1703 East Spr�gue A�e., Su ite B-3 FiLE Mo./Nan��: �-�� `t]� `!� � Spokane Valley, WA 99�a6 � Tel. [�Q�3} 921-J.C}�� Fax: {509] 9�1-1�}Q8 Ru►NNxN�FEEt �� C�S� {�lanninc��ars�rcfk��evalle .v �rp �.� ��. S'�PA FE�: GO�MRREHEhISIVE PLAN AMEhIQIUIENT APPLICATI�N P14RT t--APPLICATIDN INFOR{VlAT1C]N �Check 4ne) aMap Amendment � Text Amendment PROpE��r�7w�v��: Hultman Family Trust LLC 8� 5Efi LL.G C!(�Jr�hn Hultman MAILII�G AC]T}R�SS: 3876 E Aphrodite Ct CiTY: Boisa 5��tE: �� Z��: 837�� Ernaii: JQhnanderma@gmail.�cam PI'fC�AI�: [MM� _ {NIISe �CELL� I APPL.lCANT: �W�ght� Hume MAILING A�CIRESS: 9101 N Mt. VI+�W L�11B +�ITY: �Pakane $fiA7�: �A Z�P. ��$ Ernail: dhume c�spokane-landuse.c�m PH��l�; (►�M) {W�p 4��-31 Q$ �c��} S�me R�u�Tivr�s�r�To�wr��: Agent for t3wners PROPERTY LO�CA'�1�D�1(ADDRESS A�1�IOFt 1715TA�iCE aNR QIREC`TIC}hl FROM NEAR�ST CR�SS STREE7): 5EC vf Progress and 5prague Avenve. S�e �ttached map and legals ASS�5soR PARC��.No.: �ee aftached PROPERTY SfzE: 4.57 acres CURFtE�tT C�MPREHENSIV�PLAN D�SIGNA71dN: �lx8d 115�AVer��e PR�1PC]SED COMPI��HENSIVE PLAN pE51GNAT�C]N: Neighborhpad Center CU�iRENT ZaH��IG CLASSIF�CATlO�i; Mixed Use Aven�e PRt7PC]5�D ZvNI1�G Cl�AS59F[GA�`�o�1: N�ighborhooCi Centers BRIEFLY ExPLAliV R�ASDN FOR ll[IAP GtR T�7CT AMEhFi3MENT[A7TACH FULL E]CPLAI�ATIC]Ny; A more lagical bc�undary fnr Neighborhood Cer�ter is Progress Rd rather than a pr�perty ovunership iine See Attach�d SfGI�A7URE C]�F PR�QP�RTY QWi��R: UATE: 51GNATURE OF APPL.ICAHT: � I7AT�: �I�/�� Camprei�ensive Pfan Amen��n�nt P ket 'Aage 3 of 13 P:1Corr�munxty C3euelopment4p2 A,dminisiratienl63 Farms-Official VersionslLang�tang�PlanninglCom�Plan Amend Application Fflrm 2011,dac 1 � �.l sl V��r Lant3 [Tse P�.annin� Services 97.41 �T. h[T, VTEW L�AN� Spokane, WA 9�218 509--435-3108 (Vy 5Q9-957-t]224 (�') �.�-��-1� Mike Rasin�er Cnmmunity Develapment Depar�tnent �. 117�17 Sprague Avenue 5uite ?06 Spokat��V�[�ey, WA 992�6 Ref; Annuai Cc�mp Plar�IVI�p Am�ndi�ient to SARP De�Mske: Pursuant to aur Pre-Ap�lication meetiiig dis�ussia�is � have prepar+�d a map amendment ta 4.57 acres 1c��ated a�the SE cQ�•nez•of prag�•ess �nd Spra�ue Avenue fi�i•my cliei�ts G�mmanly kna�wn as the I�lult�nan F�mmily Trust LLC anr� SET LLC. Th�ir a•equest is ta amend the abov�desc�•ibeci �arerp�rty frort3 Mixed [Jse A�enue to Neighbarhr�od C�nter fflr the�r en�ire vwnership, tsee attached ir�ap}. Please note that this wi�l �xel�tde twc�other crwr��rships that are adjacent tc� this ownership aFid e�r�l�ess rnadified as wel�, will iea�e them as Mix�d Llse ,q�venu�. These ai•e the Kentuc�Cy F^ried Clucken located at Sprague and o��r��st b��ndary and a resic�en�e ln�ated or� tl�e tiortli sid� �f l St A�ei�ue at 151 Z 1 E 1�`l+�venue anc� id�ntifie� as Parcel Nui�ii�er�5?31,[]215. I will ieave th� issue af their inclusion to the c��scredon af�t�ff a�zd the Planning Cammissivn. To con�:Iude,my clients�'e pleased wit� the direction axid mandate af t��e �ity Cc�uncil to repeal SARP.Natwithstanding, if ihere wea•e any otl�er outcame that �pared SA.RP vfthis repea�; #hey desir�d to ha�e t�is a�nendinenl considered and��}�r��ed ai�d ubtnat tl�e san�� aecardin�ly, Re full s, nu�'ed, r,, aWlg � L1ITlE Land Use Pla��iing Services Copy: Hultn��n Family Trust L��and SET LLC, ovvn�rs � . � w il:A� i .n �ti � � e e � A � � �� . _ i l . r _ i . 1.-r�—i' hL.� , .. �_ �- �'�,,_ . . !' E �' ' - Z r"' � .I ''''1K1`�Y yittt �s''�i� .:r1Fi5 1; , e� �i fT� �` '� *`. _ ��^ _�� c r.�,� _ ,�i 1�j '�' �,c_..�.'�ME �'�1r"_y 7,,37 . �,� • � - '�`. , - , . Y1 - I � : .,�! �_ '� . r � ,� _� � . _ �.�� . _ _.. �_. . _ _-�- . _ . �:t= � � :_ _ -_ :_ � {-�_» _ _ � _ _ -� � �. - . r �..t �� - _ r ,.,� �� `��;�"�,!.� � �----- -� _ _.�.,. ��— '� _ s ' _ _' . 4 !r�i.�t - . " >�1�; i _ - _ =..�k'.F �!� r _r t �1. - a, i"_ .- . , _�^ , _� _, 1 . r~ . ,_ -- - � —F =- _-- �-�- � - +-, `_*t'!S� �'� — _-- -- - � �� -s �-. �_ y '_ _` — =='�:� �_- - -� _ - - �-�� 4 _-."� � r� .. ��l - .�� F �� -� ��c�l�� °c�� . -�� `"� i :-� ' -`"� , . � — � . ��iE�y � _ � ��,�� .��„s ~ �;� , �';� ' - - C �� _ I',, Y` � �_�. I ;Y ,, 4��' �,�-" . : �.�� - ;, k _;i _ 1J L�' �. �', Nrr� . �- � fl� _ - •-'� -'y��n � C ' , � , �� _r 1 _. ' _ `�l`I� . .. �. -� , . i; �� , °'_ —- _ x .- ,c _ . . _ . ��- , �� - � � - � �� . . _ - ._ . � — � !� et. ��f.� �� -a - i-, i ��- � �.,�� i � �, I � �. 1 - � � i ,�, - P. � �^�'v'� ' .�, _ .��" r._ 1°.-. _ q �1 -�� • L�{�� .-, �� 4 4 � 4 �y��I�� _ �' + �i � �f • 1 � 1 -�_P' �• i_�Jfr "� �JS� �f� ��_ y/ � .—vrs'" � �s'-YR}f�.��`� _ -- - ' _ '_ � W�� L^ _ �_ —�s�v,y .`! g � �� Y _ •� �� • - � i � I PART IV APP'LICANT S�GNATURE I, �► r�' , ��rin# name� SWEAR QR AF�IRM 7HAT THE ABOVE RESI�D � MA � TRUT_ �ULLY�,NQ TC3 TH� BEST DF MY KN(7WLEDGE. .--�' �fF`c�,/i'� tSi ture) (4atc�} Nv-rA�v {For Part iV a#�oVey STATE t7�WASHINGTON } ss: �C}UNTY�F S�OKANE ) S11�5CRI�E�Ah1D SWaRN to before me this �=�E day af a ,t��,,�,�ii1�J[ r , 2� �`�:. � NCJTARY SEA� , `' --'� . �, _ _ _ - NC? AR 5�G�4A7lJRE Nvtaty Public in and for the State o�Vllashir�gtvn f,rt. � _ �2G'SlCfilll� �t. -l.�`L- l� ` - — - ��,�.�►��t�1��r �Y �F�pointm�n#expires: ', .! ''-}-- `► 4 '`' t��'�M r��i `�„�'v.��,`'�iipi�,'�.'��►►+L ��✓ � �(�.-s��`�Y � �i*;�fi r r i —�.°� O + y }— /� . i ;# ► �� `.,'y �` � � E�O� ��L�ti s�` � �i `■ � ,�� 5��s��ti�4 ti�P-�._ �� .'4]`E C�F - � , , Comprehensive Piar�Amerrdment P�ck+�t Page�of 13 P:1Commti�rrity perle;�x�rmen1102 Adri�inislralion103 Forms-4fftciaf VersfonslLang Range PlanninglCamp�lan Amend Applicatian Form 2011.dt7C AUTHQRIZAT�aN TOR REPRCS�IVT I, w�herei�y affirm that I am the managing partner vf�ET LLC, owner af pr�perty hounded by 5�ra�ue A�enue and �irst A�enue narkh and s�uth, a�rsd Pro�ress on fhe we�t and I.ib��y Tire nn the east per at�aGhed exhibit. We I�ereby authoi•ize. Dwight J Htirne ta i•epi�esent our intere5t in this rrtatter beFare the City af Sp�kanc Valley reviewing bodies. i y 5 rr'�'kyj i�t�i. +L�c�� (�'�,l�.L�,,,r'C: C3wn�r af l�e�ord ; ACKI'"�IQ W LEDG�1V�ENT: STATE{�F C�L(�RAD(7 ) } 55. CC}UNTY QF ARAPAH(]E } On t�ais ?-� -•'' day od�4ctak�er, 2U1Q, befo�e me, il�e u�idersi�ned, a Ncatary Public in and for the St ta e of Calc�rado,duiy cammissianed and sworn, pexso�ally ap�ear�d - ; , , 4 , ta me knvwn t� be the indi�idual tha�executed the fcr�•e�oin�inst�im�i�t and�cknawleciged tl�e said °uYStrument to be f`ree and hisfher free and��Qiuntary aet and c��ed, far the uses and p�rposes tl�crein inentic�ned. Witness my hanc� and official seal hereto affixed the day and year�rst abc�ve written. ��.p,R Y��p�� i �MA1S �t3 t_ a'� �'�A�r � � °^� j'Q NQtary Pu�lic in and for the State uf Colara�io ��],��(]L�p,Pa residing at _ _ ALT'�'IIiD�ti�ATIQN T4 REPRESENT I, w�h�reby affii�nl that I a�n the managin�p�rtner of Hultrnaiz I'an-�ily LLC, awner of propei°ty bounded hy Sprague Avei�ue �iyd First A�r�nu� nortl��cid south, and Fa-o�;ress ai� the west a�id Liberty 7ire ai�the east per attacl�ed exhibit. We herchy �uthcri-ize awi�lit,T Hume tQ r�present nui•intee-est in this m�tter beiore tlle Ciry Qf Spokan�Valley re�iewii3g bodies. �P date � '�� d [}wn of cord ACKIYOWLED�EMGNT: STATE C]F WASHCi�GTtJh�' } } ss. CC]UNTY C]F SP�KAN� } C]n this �� d�y t�f C7ctober, 2Q1 Q, �efe�re me, t��e undersigned, a Natary Publi� in and far the State af Washin�,ton, dt�ly comsilission�d and swc�rn, persvi�ally appeare�i _� � f;•, 1-f� . r-� ��,�� ,, , ta me lcnnwn to b�t}ie indi�idual that executed the fpre�raing insti•un��nt an�l acltnawledg�d tl�e said inst�-uinent ta be free ai�d iiislhec•free �nd v�li�ntary act and deed, for t�e uses and purposes ther�in mentiailed. Witi�ess my hand and ofticial seal heret�a affi�ed the day an�� y�ar first ahoVe writters. ? ;, ��trrt�t��r � ,_ �•`;._L �t'r1 -�) �_�_`s�-��_'_ '�— ••°��.�'�!•.��T'''f. Nota�'y P�i�lic in and far tlae 51ate of'Washing#an ti~`��0�1QR��,�''fr�'' r�.'$iLl)n� �L . l�. � � f' �1 !'-,•.. f� _ ; f�4y Gomm. Exp�rrs ; r+ . FdVtuary 28,ti�f 1 - . 1 - - 1��JBL��'4��:: - F��1 .�. `��i��i��s��`. Hultman �amily �.'FAFM�� Supplement A 1 j R�ason fvx•th�co�n�r•�hensive plan amendrnent Zoiung Boundarv Fattei�i '2'he�rz��jec�prop��•t3'i s'.fla��k�cl nr�thc� nn�•th by lhc�Neigrhl�crr•lzvad Cer��er desrgr�a�ia�crr�c! zone crtrc�thet�ag�it�c�n Che�ast bJ��he sa►rze. Hei�elafr�r•e, tl3e ,2007 zane ��r�s Comrnunrty Conarrr�r�cicrl_f[��•Ilre su�j�.�c!��nper•!y as welf as thosc� tn lhc�wc�sl, nQ�•tJ�und easl. fi�er•e rs no paf�trcular�r�ecrsotr to depar•t f'rom thrs pf•euiaus.�in�ilnr•�o��irrg pc��ier�a, e,s��ciully whc�rr the Nergh�r�r•hoc�d Cender zone is desi�nated ta the nnr•!h and ends ar Pr•ogress. Clea��y the:�crme.rtreet`could�iav�6een used far 11ae u�es!I�c�i�nr�c�ry south r�f. 3prcr,�rr�. Street patteiii: Th�subject pr�operties ai-e locc�t�d at lh��`L�C ofPrr�,�ress and Spr�rgt�e�lveratr��:�hich is cr co�rlj'od�'ec�'in�er.rec�inn.rerk�ing�r�t�uch brr�ud�r resldertcial�eighUnr•hnc�c�.�ar��h Uf. S�rer�a�e Aven��e, This i.s s�r`rrrrlrrr t�a 11re larzd r�r,�e p�tterr�anr�1•o�rd,�'t�rrctrc�iz�f Pr•ogr•es,s �xtel7cii�zg�rrorrl� vf Sprugue Aven��e tivhere t17e IVezglrl�orl�c�od C`errfer�desi��alion enc�.r. 2'he purpose a{�the Ner'ghUarl�ond Cerrter is !o be cr izar�al j�niy7!o�f`tru�c thtrt sei�ves se��er�al zzei�fcTiof�hood� Ueynjzd. As slatec��rlro>>e, Pr�a�ress�erfor°nas thcr�,farrrc;�tio��nor�h�f S�f°rrgue bul,far sorr�e �•eas�ota wcrs averlc�e�ked s�uth ofS�rague. Summ�ry and conclus�an� TJ7e subaec!�rite ,sherulr�F�e tr•ecl�ed lhe.samc crs• �he nar•1!r,srde �f S,�t•ag�e wxth Pr•c�gress� serui�g crs rhe►�s�esr baunela��Qf't{z�N�igh�ar��•l2�ar.l C'enler•r�e.�ignrrt�oi�r, si��ce Pa•agy��ss ��er•ues the sat��e saeighhn�°l�ood c�lle�tot',fur��tioiz bath �zn�•th arad s�otlth a��S�r•crgue. ,l��plica.bl�Criteria A. The prnpas�ci�mei�din�nt Ue�rs �subsiantial reiationslup tc�ihe�u�alic health,safety, welfare, and�rotection o�'the e�n�ir�nment; The�ar•o�osed czrrzenc�rrzes7a��ozrlr�allo�� tlze ap�licali�rt of�he Neighbr��{l7vod C'e►ztf�r• c�es•agrrc�tion ennsi.s�[errt�zt�t vs�hat hc�s�xlf•eady heerr c�e.ri��rrated aCon�r the�nrtl�.srde Qf 45J�rcrgr�e�tuerTt�e,fi•c��n�Sirfli��utr 1a Pa•vgr•ess. A,s such i1 is fhej•�f�r•e i�r complrcrnce ��ill7 upplicuhl.e goe�ls rxnd pUlicies.ru��or�ting u�hrrt hrrs cur•r•entl�bee�r designcxtc�d. Si�ace rr r.�� ther•e�or•e cos�s�iste�zc x�illz �hese cipplical�Ic�gaals cand policie.s, if hear•s a subostrrntr�rl r�l�rliaraslr�p to the pasblic l�ealth, safe�y, ti�lelfa�•e a�ac�the en�vi�°onrr�ejal. $. The prQpased amendment is consistent wit�a ttae renui�•emei�ts af R�C W 3b.70l-� a�� witlY th� ��rtian nf'the City's adapteti pfau� n�t �ffected by the amendm,ent; Thc pr'opt�sed�r�c�itiata �a!he 11��i�hbot•havd C�ntef•Dr's��•ic[�`�flou�s•[�ae purpa.�e cr�d znt��r�af the N�de.�i�rralran lncalic�r�crr��ria und is�orrszs�ent x�xth whaC hcrs al�•eadv veer�appra�r�d. As,ruclz ir roc�compls�s �>ith rhe applic��e�rovisians nf'RCW 3c5.7C1A �rince thcs�,slale��egulatrans dictat� wh�zt tlae comprehensr��e 1`and use plcrrr �r�r�st i�acluc��. G. Tl�e propos�d arn�ndment respands t� a suhstantial cha�ige in cvnsditinns b�yond th� p��o}�erty awn�r"�control appli�able to the area within whiclY the suhje��proper�y lies; Nr��,�pplicable D. '�"he�ropas�d�mmendznent c�rrects a�i obvi�us r�iappir��ex•rar; �'he�rnp�.sed crmet�clrnent u�at�lc�rncrke !he h�es�erly�xle�sio�1�f�he Nei�h$�j•hoor!C'��ter hr�r•tic��curtsas��ra�wrlh the existi�ag borcler•rzn�-tjr c�f Sp��a,�ue Av�naee�4�l�rGh nr�w cxfer�ds ta �r•rjgr•ess Rr�ad. It crl.sn ackr�c�t�ledges�rhe f'r.��2c�ion r�f Pragr•ess L1.5 U i1L'1��7�larfroad ser��i�zg crr�ter�iu�cci�d.S�are�gue a�ac�1'r•agress crs a��ndcrl J�oint cr��pr�ap►•rctte far th�Ne�glabvr•,�taocl Cerrter c�esigncr�ion. E. The pr�posed amendmer�t addresses ar� identified defciency in the Con��rel�+e2lsive Plan. fllof A,pplrc�ble SVMC 17.8i].I40 cit�s tiie fallawing specific factors that rnust h� addressed ir�c��•der far C`t�mprehensive F'lan amenclrr►en�to be apprQVed. Please�dr�r�ss tbe fol�owing f�ct�r4: A. `I'h� effect upon tl�e physical en�ironm�nt; Tlxe Nea�hl�a��hoc�r�CerTfer-ca�egos�v�f�5:�1 RP Jrc:�s it's crti�>>fi lJe�fornyar�c e s�a�d�r�•�ls thc�f �•egulri��or•cnntr•ol the �Pzsaac�l rrrapacts arr the ph}�5:ice�l enurro�zment. 7'hese devc�loprrreaa� slr�ndc�r�s u�ill a�ply if S�I�P is�•�tcrined as�r�el�met�t of the campr•eh�nsive��lan. B. The eFfect oi� open space, strearns, ri�ers, and lakes; Fo��tlte �rra,�t part t3�is.faelar� is rrat rrpplicable beccrt�se at ls a�� urb�rrr�leuelr�l�me�1 designation wi�hnz�t ntay r�f lhese elerrrents exrstrng ar planr�ed fr�r the irnmedrr�le crr•eu. �)ra the ather•Frand, the�zigh lev�l of c�'evelr��rr�es7t,str��7�.�ar-d.s°ef�s•ure.s•the qiraliry n,f�he f�ur!! er�vrr•c�nrrterat tcr f�e uestheticadl}�pleasin�. C. Tlie campatibility with and ianpact on adjacent land uses and surroui�din�; neighborl�oacls; �.3•s!a[GC!ul�Qi>e, 11r� dex��lcr�rrrent strzndcrr•ds r•e�ul�ztrng the cccl��eel irrzpr•averr7ent,s x�illzin 1{�i,s cufegor°y��rs�.rr�� Compafil]i�iiy��Yl�h �I7e std�°rorrrrdirrgs. D. The adequacy ofan� im�act an c�mmunity faci�ities including utilities, raads, puhiic transportatioi2, pa��ks, recreatic�n and schnals; This i.r n r•e1ai1 cate�ary of`sirnzlar•inten,sYty to the �1�1'ixed U.re cate�or�y, There are u�ban ��rl�ices i�t p��e etr�d�c� udr�r�rosurl ex�t�trsi��r�s fcrt•esecn�c�accv�rtr�fic��lale Nei�lzhaf•�rar�d Cerarer�serwicea�to thar a�'the exrsting rrrixe�+u,re crrregory. E. The bene�t tv tl�e neigh�a��l�s�ad, city a�zd re�ion; The laenefi� to th� r�eigh�ionc�rnd ts canverrie��ce r�frrcces,srbilrlyfoj�ser��ices pr•fn�ided. 11�z�s rtrecflrtg t�te i�lCent u��this�aleg��. II�rl,sr��f�ar�rcles crn vp�ortx�ni��or szn3ilur• seer�irice5 tn thcrt ncr�ss the str°��►cr�rd flaer•eby expcxr�ds upora needed cc�rrue�7ief�ce servrc�s .�or t�r�.�°e wis�rirrg tc�slr��ir� this 1��utioPa. F. The�uantity�nd locati��af Iand pla�uzed f'or the pra��sec� l�id use type and c�ensity, and tl�e demand for such �at�d; 7'his firc��r ir not upplacable cr,r t�tis is an r�ctjusltrre�l t� nn ej�rai�i�the�lan that creat�d an inccr�asi.st�ent lrrnd u.se desigrtrxtian hound�fy. T`hef�e �.s Mo evr"clence thc�t�1�e cirr•re�rt Uvu�rrlar��_,for Nei�h�iat•hovcl Cen�er•reflecrs rhe r�ua�rirarr'►�e�nadysi�•r��'er•r�cl tc�. G. Tl�e c�irrent az�d proje�t�d ptrpuiatio;� d��sity in the a�•ea; .5'ee iter�t F abo�e. ar�d H. The effe�t upc�n otller aspects of the Comprehei�si�e Plan. This rrrrnor arrr�r�dtne�r�10 crdd�.S7 acres !o the Neagf�bnf�haac�Ce�ter•cut��r��i,s� in,sit�nifican� !�l�ie r•�st af�the�lan, 1V�'�a�•eover. mrrf�y uses a11c�x�c�d r�r tl�e Mixed tlse catcg�a;y�rf�e alsa crllowed 1n the .�Vei�l��arhaor��'er7te�� errtega�}r, s� ther� is•lirlle lor�� tei•��a eharzge fi�am tdae ane ccrtegc�r-y�tn the othej� thc7t aff�cts the eity�sjide�vlan. ASSE5St3R'S P�RCEL 3�(UMB ERS Pa�•cel N�rnber Pa�•cel Si�e �wner 45231.�7I09 4{�fJ�} sf 5ET LLC 45�31.�DZ 1 U 31 SSZ sf S�T ULG 45�31,Q21 l l�18�43 sf Hultman Fa.mily LLC �5�31.(321� 7�98 �f SET L�LC 45231.�2�3 9U31 sf �-Iultm�ei Family LLC ��31.53�1� �b88g sf SET LLC �5231.�1�16 935�st SET LLC 4523 l.�J��8 10�10 sf �Iultman Family LLC 45z31.�DZ24 2[�21$ sf SET LLC �5231.0226 �i9�35 s� SET T�L+C 149013 sf ��.�7 ac.) 6 "� 102.50 90 _ -_ 142.50_- — � —-- 60__ _ __31.70_28.30_83.]fl • ':` �. " "" — — — — _i _ — IQ � a 1.0226 � .7 /y.1.1sI �n r �r �1� N - I.0 P IY � 1.a1�9' 9.D294 � _ ' N � a '' �.D224 31 N _- 1.Q210 ° �as � m 47.5 � BS - i 4215 `° a5 ._.,Im� , - { � � �., e � 9fl.2s m I s 1�5 1.b213 T 1.0292 ° ,.o-�,s °� � 1.0211 � „`, "!� � °' � � � a7:� 20 1A218 r � ��a.as 1.U432 � 335 47i � 1.�115 .� ,�1 J- F.�e.'Zyt�!� - 203.50 4 �,,. ry� '-'1 '� 74 37 69 74 72.4Q � �s u,. 1.0320 0 �1�J , an �� 203.50 cn � n rn ""'#r'"'.- °° _ I� t� eti - --_ '�.0321 � 1.0323 � N i� 'o rt_�� 203.5 _. 1.fJ322 0 1.�324 - 1.032� 1.0327 1.Q32$ � (.� ��r,�� . . � . . �, il:al� i ' � � � � � � � a � � � — l �i ^ _ - , , E� • . � -. �G�—� �_ � 1�. .� �� ,t� � ��._ � �#'.L�t�= ' r�� c�.�y_-�. rI �� -�"�✓�� ••'�1:` � � �� - . —�s: . - - . ��-- .r� �� , �: - . � � . �r. _ � !� ''�i ! ' � 4 ��i- � - . _ �� _ - _ - -- - :6;� ., i ii..t- �� . .�`'. . � � �'�,��y, � -. 1 . - ' ♦ - � - _ �l'-r 4�r::�,^ ,°"� '�w��_, 4: � -"'� .. _ . - .. - � '�� t —� — — _ — —�_ ��...:,;��„� _ �-_ - �- �.I � � I' �t �.` . �. �;-. � � z. -�' {� �[�€rl�C�s�� i{��1�� p. t�''' ' , , ,� _�r,. . �., �',-f� ',� ��i1t� :?,«c�`a - • �- '�! � � - � �'s�� " � - - —t`� � � � � _ _,,. �,� , -.� _ ,�_ `s � �(- ` ,. ; _ - • � .� . ~ , r�,P � _ �. '�-!�� . •.i�c �' . 4„ _ �,[ . �' .Y . ��. �1�„� � �i�� ,: � _��I� �.j_ �; ' � f e� , _ �•. � ,n� . .-_ . . .�w.b � ' � . �' „ � � � 1.i , ' .. � �T� �� (o�q�.!' ❑ r ��K � � � � 1 rr + ,�_ A, �� . '� � -" �C47G. '� .,5� ,=� � � � �`, � �r. .� i �� _ �' • ,. �; - �,,� - . . - - - - � � C. !��_ � - —�r� :-- - r T i�.3�-3�._.7� .�� W� r � ��=°��-� !�—, �' � ,- • �� . �_��''sd y,t'-- - . � . , . i ........... ( ci��u� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ' PLANNING DIVISION ' ' �+�� Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) PROros�.: CPA-01-11 DESCRIPTION oF PxoPOSAL: Site-specific comprehensive plan map amendment to change the designation on parcels 45321.0109, 45231.0210, 45231.0211, 45231.0212, 45231.0213, 45231.0214, � 45231.0216, 45231.0218, 45231.0224 and 45231.0226 from Mixed Use Avenue (MUA) to Neighborhood Center(NCT) comprehensive plan and zoning designation. ' �PL�cA1vT:Dwight Hume; 9101 North Mt. View Lane; Spokane, WA 99218 I � OWNER: John Hultman, Hultman Family Trust, LLC & SET LLC; 3876 East Aphrodite Ct; Boise, ID � 83716 LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:Parcels 45321.0109, 45231,0210, 45231.0211, 45231a0212, 45231,0213, 45231.0214, 45231.0216, 45231.0218, 45231.0224 and 45231.0226; located on the southeast corner of Progress Road and Sprague Avenue; further located in the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 23, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. LEAD AGENCY: Spokane Valley The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact � on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW ; 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other ! information on file with the lead agency. This infortnation is available to the public on request. i � i DETERMINATION: � ❑ There is no comment period for this DNS. � This DNS is issued using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. There is no further comment period on the DNS. ❑ This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2);the lead agency will not act on his proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Kathy McClung, Community Development Director; 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106; Spokane Valley, WA 99206; (509) 720-5300 � I DATE ISSUED: February 4, 2011 S�GNATU�: � ( ArPE�.: An appeal of this detertnination shall be submitted to the Community Development Department within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date issued. The appeal must be written and make specific factual objections to the City's threshold determination. Appeals shall be conducted in conformance with Section 17.90 (Appeals) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code, and any required fees pursuant to the City's adopted Fee Scheduled shall be paid at time of appeal submittal. Pursuant to WAC 197-11-680, appeals shall be limited to a review of a final threshold determination. City of Spokane Valley February 4,2011 Determination ofNon-Si�ificance(DNS) Page 1 of 2 � CPA-01-11 ( . .... . .. . ... . ..... . . . ... . .. .. ... . .. ... ......... . . . . ' I i , . i ......... �.. ! THIS DNS WAS MAILED TO: Applicant Owner City of Liberty Lake, Community Development City of Spokane, Planning Services Spokane County, Boundary Review Board Spokane County, Building and Planning Spokane County Division of Utilities-Info Svc � Spokane County, Clean Air Agency Spokane County, Fire District No. 1 Spokane County, Fire District No. 8 Spokane County, Regional Health District Spokane Transit Authority (STA) Spokane Regional Transportation Council Washington State Department of Ecology,(Spokane) Washington State Department of Ecology (Olympia) ' � � i , City of Spokane Valley February 4,2011 j Determination of Non-Significance(DNS) Page 2 of 2 � CPA�O1�11 � i ( COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION �`pokane STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE ��T��1�� PLANNING COMMISSION CPA-02-11 STAFF REPORT DATE: Febi'uaI'y 16, 2011 HEax�NG DaTE AN� LocaT�oN: February 24, 2011, beginning at 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers, Valley Redwood Plaza Building, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 101, Spokane Valley, Washington 99206. PROPOSAL DESCxiPTioN: Site-specific comprehensive plan map amendment to change the designation on parcel 451742102 from Low Density Residential with an R-3 zoning designation to Medium Density Residential with an MF-1 zoning designation. PxoPOSaL LocaTioN: Parcel 451742102; addressed as 503 North Walnut Road; further located in the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 17, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane Counry, Washington. APPL�cANT: Ann Martin, Heylman Martin Architects; 100 North Stevens Street; Spokane, WA 99201 owNEx: St. John Vianney Catholic Parish; 503 North Walnut Road; Spokane Valley, 99206 APPxovaL CiuTExia: Chapter 2 (Urban Land Use) of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Title 17 (General Provision), Title 19 (Zoning Regulations), and Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION: Tl1e Planning Division, after review and consideration of the submitted application and applicable approval criteria, recommends that the Planning Commission approve CPA-02-11. STAFF PLANNER: Karen Kendall, Assistant Planner, Community Development Department �vlEwEn sy: Scott Kuhta, AICP, Planning Manager, Community Development Department ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Comprehensive Plan Map Exhibit 2 Zoning Map Exhibit 3: 2008 Aerial Map Exhibit 4: Vicinity Map Exhibit 5: Transportation Map Exhibit 6: Application Submittal Exhibit 7: SEPA Determination Exhibit 8: Public Comments StaffReport and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-02-11 Page 1 of 7 L BACKGROUND INFORMATION APPL�cAT�oN PxocESS�NG: Chapter 17.80 Permit Processing Procedures in the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). The following summarizes key application procedures for the proposal. Pre-Application Meeting: November 15, 2010 Application Submitted: November 24, 2010 Determination of Completeness: November 24, 2010 Issuance of Determination of Non-Significance (DNS): February 4, 2011 End of Appeal Period for DNS: February 18, 2011 Date of Published Notice of Public Hearing: February 4, 2011 Date of Mailed Notice of Public Hearing: February 9, 2011 PROPERTY INFORMATION: Size and Characteristics: The site is approximately 1.91 acres in size. The SEPA checklist states the site is flat. Comprehensive Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: Single Family Residential District (R-3) Existing Land Use: The parcel is an existing parking lot serving the St. John Vianney Catholic Church and School. SURROUNDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN,ZONING,AND LAND USES: North Comprehensive Plan—Low Density Residential (LDR) Zoning—Single Family Residential District(R-3) Existing Land Uses —St. John Vianney Catholic Church and single family residences South Comprehensive Plan — High Density Residential (HDR) Medium Density Residential (MDR) and Low Density Residential (LDR) Zoning — High Density Multi-family Residential District (MF-2), Medium Density Multi- family Residential District (MF-1) and Single Family Residential Urban District(R-3) Existing Land Uses —Single family residences East Comprehensive Plan—Low Density Residential (LDR) Zoning—Single Family Residential District(R-3) Existing Land Uses —Single-family residences West Comprehensive Plan—Low Density Residential (LDR) Zoning— Single Family Residential District(R-3) Existing Land Uses —St. John Vianney Catholic School and single family residences IL FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA Findings: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC), the lead agency has determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 4321C.030(2)(c). The Planning Division issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) for the proposal. This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. StaffReport and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-02-11 Page 2 of 7 Conclusion(s): The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act and Title 21 of the SVMC have been fulfilled by the applicant's submittal of the required SEPA Checklist, and the issuance of the City's threshold determination consisting of a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). No appeals were received. III. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT A. COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE 17 (GENERAL PROVISIONS) OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE Findings: Section 17.80.140 H. (Com�rehensive Plan Amendment A�roval Criteria) S�okane Vallev Munici�al C ode 1. The City may approve Comprehensive Plan amendments and area-wide zone map amendments if it finds that(analysis is italicized): a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; Staff Comment: The City's adopted policies of the Comprehensive Plan state in part "the economic development strategy is to promote a more diverse economy [thatJ would achieve a better balance between jobs, housing and support the City's desired quality of life" (Section 2.3.1). The site-specific amendment offers additional opportunities to achieve the balance by expanding the land use available for further diverse development. The application states the intent is to provide senior citizen housing. b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the Ciry's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; Staff Comment: The state-wide planning goals and policies provide the basis for the City's Comprehensive Plan and guidance in the development of goals and policies. State-Wide Planning Goals: Goal 1: Urban Growth. Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner. Goal 4:Housing. Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population of this state,promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage preservation of existing housing stock. Approval of the requested site-specific amendment would meet both state-wide planning goals cited above. The proposed location is served by all necessary urban services and provides for appropriate in-fill development with the City of Spokane T�alley. The City has adopted development regulations that are designed to address specific impacts related to new development such as off-street parking, landscaping, lighting, setbacks and height. The site- specific amendment is consistent with the Growth ManagementAct. Adjacent land use designations are consistent with the amendment. StaffReport and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-02-11 Page 3 of 7 c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; Staff Comment: The site-specific amendment is not responding to a change in conditions. d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or Staff Comment: The site-specific amendment does not correct a mapping error. e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Staff Comment: The site-specific amendment does not address an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The Ciry must also consider the following factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan amendments: a. The effect upon the physical environment; Staff Comment: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the City of Spokane T�alley Uniform Development Code, the lead agency has determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. The site-specific amendment is a non project action under SEPA. At the time of the submittal of the building permit application, an additional SEPA review would likely be required to evaluate the impacts of the use(s) and proposed structure(s) on the physical environment. b. The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes; Staff Comment: The SEPA checklist states that there is no surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity ofsite. c. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; Staff Comment: The site-specific amendment is contiguous to a Medium Density Residential Comprehensive Plan designation on the south. At the time of development, standards in Title 22 (Design and Development Standards), specifically 22.70 (Fencing, Screening, and Landscaping) will reduce impacts on adjacent low density residential designated properties by providing visual separation and physical buffers between land uses. d. The adequacy of and impact on communiry facilities including utilities, roads,public transportation,parks, recreation, and schools; Staff Comment: The City of Spokane T�alley addresses adequacy of community facilities on a citywide basis through capital facilities planning. Policy CFP-9.1 of the Comprehensive Plan recommends a concurrency management system for transportation, sewer, and water facilities. The City of Spokane T�alley's Parks and Recreation Plan outlines an implementation strategy including a capital facilities plan, which identifies costs and revenue sources for new parks. At the time of development, the site-specific amendment may have an impact on transportation. At the time of the submittal of any building permit applications, an additional SEPA review may be required to evaluate the impacts of the use(s) and proposed structure(s) on the physical environment in regards to transportation. e. The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region; StaffReport and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-02-11 Page 4 of 7 Staff Comment: The subject site is owned by St. .Iohn Vianney, which has a K-8 school, church and play field adjacent to site-specific amendment. Senior housing is proposed to complement the existing uses on site. £ The quantiry and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land; Staff Comment: The site-specific amendment is approximately 1.91 acres in size. The intent of this comprehensive plan amendment is to merge a portion of parcel 45174.2103 with the subject parcel by a boundary line adjustment for a total of 2.7 acres. Senior housing is proposed with approximately forty (40) dwelling units. The amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will have minimal impact on other aspects of the plan. g. The current and projected population density in the area; and Staff Comment: The site-specific amendment is intended to provide approximately forty (40) housing units to low-income seniors through residential bonus densities. The site-specific amendment does not demand population analysis. h. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. Staff Comment: The site-specific amendment is consistent with the comprehensive plan and will have minimal impact on other aspects of the plan. B. COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE 19 (ZONING REGULATIONS) OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE Findings: Section 19.60.040 (Nei�hborhood Commercial District) Spokane Vallev Municipal Code The Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment is from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential and corresponding zoning map amendment from Single-family Residential District (R-3) to Multifamily Medium Density Residential District(MF-1). The Medium Densiry Residential designation is intended to provide a range of housing types to accommodate anticipated residential growth with densities not to exceed twelve (12) units per acre. Multifamily residential zones should be used as transitional zoning between higher intensity land uses, such as commercial and office, to lower density single-family neighborhoods. High density residential areas should be located near services and high capacity transit facilities or transit routes. Conclusion(s): The 1.91 acres allows the opportunity for flexible development in housing types with a minimum size 3,600 square feet per dwelling unit. At the time of development, standards in Title 22 (Design and Development Standards), specifically 22.70 (Fencing, Screening, and Landscaping) will reduce impacts on adjacent low density residential designated properties by providing visual separation and physical buffers between land uses. C. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Comprehensive plan states that Medium Density Residential designation represents an opportuniry to provide a range of housing types to accommodate anticipated residential growth. StaffReport and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-02-11 Page 5 of 7 1. LUG-1 of the Comprehensive Plan recommends preserving and protecting the character of Spokane Valley's residential neighborhoods. Staff Comment: The Medium Density Residential designation allows fZexibility and a wide range of housing options. At the time of development, standards in Title 22 (Design and Development Standards), specifically 22.70 (Fencing, Screening, and Landscaping) will reduce impacts on adjacent low density residential designated properties by providing visual separation and physical buffers between land uses. 2. LUP-1.3 of the Comprehensive Plan encourages review and revisions as necessary for existing land use regulations to provide for innovation and flexibility in the design of new residential developments, accessory dwelling units and in-fill development. Staff Comment: The Medium Density Residential designation will allow fZexibility in development with the option of different housing types from single family residential, clustered housing, duplexes, townhouses and/or apartments. 3. HG-3 of the Comprehensive Plan encourages meeting the housing needs of special populations including the elderly, mentally ill, victims of domestic abuse,persons with debilitative conditions or injuries, and the homeless. Staff Comment: The Medium Density Residential designation will allow fZexibility in development. The intent of this comprehensive plan amendment is to merge a portion of parcel 45174.2103 with the subject parcel by a boundary line adjustment for a total of 2.7 acres. Senior housing is proposed with approximately forty (40) dwelling units. D. PUBLIC FACILITIES Findings: The property is currently served with public water and sewer. Walnut Road provides access and designated as a Local Access Street(Exhibit 5). E. FINDING AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO PUBLIC COMMENTS Findings: Staff has received two (2) public comments concerning the proposal to date. Public comments are focused on increased traffic concerns and the potential of Valleyway Avenue being extended to Walnut Road. The comments are attached in Exhibit 8. Conclusion(s): The proposal is considered a non-project action and future development is not a part of the decision making process. At the time of future development, traffic will be reviewed and determined by the City's Traffic Engineer. Adequate public noticing was conducted for CPA-02-11 in accordance with adopted public noticing procedures. F. FINDING AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO AGENCY COMMENTS Findings: Staff has received no agency comments to date. Conclusion(s): StaffReport and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-02-11 Page 6 of 7 No concerns are noted. IV. OVERALL CONCLUSION The proposed Comprehensive Plan designation to Neighborhood Commercial and change in zoning classification to NC is consistent with the Comprehensive Plans policies and goals. V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Planning Division after review and consideration of the submitted application and applicable approval criteria recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of CPA-02-11. Planning Commission Findings and Factors (Section 17180140H of the SVMC): Findin�s a. The public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment is furthered by ensuring economic diversity and a better balance between jobs, housing and support of the City's desired quality of life. b. The proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are consistent with Chapter 36.70A RCW (Growth Management Act). c. The proposed amendment is not responding to a change in conditions. d. The proposed amendment does not correct a mapping error. e. The proposed amendment does not address an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Factors: a. Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the City of Spokane Valley Municipal Code, the lead agency has determined that the proposed amendment does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. b. The proposed amendment is a non-project amendment and will not affect open space, streams, rivers, and lakes. c. The proposed amendment is contiguous to medium density residential zoned properties. Any potential impact to adjacent properties will be addressed during the development of the property and can be mitigated with design and development standards. d. Future development of the site may impact traffic in the area. At the time of development, an additional SEPA review will be required to evaluate the impacts of increased traffic. e. The proposal is consistent with the character of the neighborhood and will provide a wider array of commercial uses serving the neighborhood. £ The proposed amendment will not increase population densities and does not demand population analysis. g. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will have minimal impact on other aspects of the plan. Recommended Motion: The Planning Commission finds CPA-02-11 to be consistent with Section 17.80.140 (H) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). The Planning Commission adopts the findings in the staff report and recommends approval of CPA-02-11, a change to Medium Density Residential with a subsequent zone change to Medium Density Multifamily Residential District (MF-1). StaffReport and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-02-11 Page 7 of 7 Comprehensive Plan Map Spr-ingfield CPA-02-11 �St John Vianney b �� x Valle�vay V-ali'eyway � � � -� � � -d a � CPA-02-11 Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map City of Spokane Valley designation from LDR to MDR; subsequent zoning Community Development Department change from R-3 to MF-1. Zoning Map Spr-ingfield CPA-�2-11 St John Viannev b �� x _—_--_— Valle�vay � Vali'eyway .�... � � � -� � � -d a � CPA-02-11 Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map City of Spokane Valley designation from LDR to MDR; subsequent zoning Community Development Department change from R-3 to MF-1. 2009 Aerial Map f�� "+�,��1'A � ��+1��ia�..�� 4°�� 1��+ ��l^n "�� '�� ..�•1��y� ''��.' .. �'� �'�' r �'e� I �.l �^�P, p_�'- i, I �i,'i �� .y�.�_. � ,►�, �p�,,,��`i,�lls� w'� �.'-I, l �+J F, �.�,.. _ i �7 .. ..4. ��i4� � �� I. 0..�.. rlyja�inE�f'�r. 'r,',�1�� - _ .a�i�� 'I�� srK�C%, . �.r, . :�� .�� s � - f�. F��.' !. �. �I;�"`.._ bN� ` �� ! "�.�� ?` '►r- � .�:• C� k?�-�- � . !� . x..i. , _"` ,�: +� , . � . � �,,� . �.: .: �� 3, �� ; . �, . �� '�'b:�: �, ,''�� ?�' +� _ ,. r � �„�� ,.. , ,� Broadwa_ Broadway Broadway _ Broadway Broadway �Broadway _ � �: .. ,� � " � � , � � �. _ k � '-� �Ir^n �.-- � _ �p, �Y- k . �:� :#-�.�,'61+� ��. �*� ,� - , �, .� +� �.. � � .� � � �°Aif-IA .. i � f� �� { � � � � � .. y- � .,� . � �yr+ �,° �, y ti. _ -_ . - �F� �i ," .I, ' .. . � • R . ' �� '"I � . ".— s.e�.rTlf:1!� '�_ �� ' � '--� t I �� ' T'� � �+ii T� �� : � t '� � * "' Yy�'� � ... � T.� ��`�' '�6 _ � . ;�'�" ' �� - . , . --�, � � � . ��,� �I.,.-r �i�� .1�I�`- � :� ��- ��`�' . � '; �_��- �� - � �� ,� � � : -�r-+�*�!!� _�w��i�, .� i.. �`_ � ��• ��Y_ ,.. I M� .� +. . � �� #I �LL��a�.:.�� ''�� N�'.'��°� �',� �st�� . � 9 � .a _ –4. � � . ._�I ; _ � �� _ _ ��i ��_ � �� .��i t 3 _�_� e �� r�* �� 1 ��,—� �.� �� .� a i - � _ , , r m .�a . � ' - � M. +,,� _ ��,.T -, �.a, �. , . �' - � � �'°`� �"�'� , -_ � � • :-: - i,rF ��.J`�'' r=� -ry - - � � � A ��- �, ,, �� jk' � ` i �" ' � �' � �«a�.� � � �:.,�� ` �Il��'�'� • �-,. .�—Springfield �'� � u F�� , 'i�� i�" � �� r � y '.�R��F�.i .;� � � �r ! � �� k�w�l�i �� .��"?� .n�`. �'�-� M y '':� .��_ �~ _ �� _�T�I'�. I '� r��.+--� '� I�r.� r+w..s. '�. . _ ,��+Y` , ;_..� -r'rt�,.� � a.r_�. '�, �v� �-'$: .� �p- � - �a�� r � Y� �� , �=! - 'r"�,�... �� '� � ,a�" a� � �" '` ' '�'T"�'� ��J -"° � �!� +� ��.,� �R � �' �� :� �` ��,�` ��"��=- ��y��I� • Alki .�k ��''�.P�IS'� ��.l. :I M �:: �' � ` �i �� - __ ',�sr �F'� . - - 4 .. _ �. _•_ � ' . ' "_.' ' . ' �' �� `�'� �'`� Z�f!� i� �..:e. �°�f�. ■ �%y �. 'e�' � � �y +� r�3 � ��„� ' ' . �� s+ . � ,�'+ ` 1 5 #��r ��t�� , . r r i � M R ."� � .. y, _ �� . �� ?'�' �I _ �1�1 � I� - ' � l e. � ' F P- ' � � _ , h _.�,.� �,;�r5 . ,S ,b., �,. � -�,i _ , . � �. - �, • St Johri St<JtAI��t�� ,�-r �� ` i,w� �` ��I� �� w �'" �"` r Vianne�7, � ��' �} 4 i��r � ��w�..` ,�� r�� ° f �1.:,.* 'a . � �� .:�v __ _ - _ J. � V � � .��. .C� ' ,, � . '� �p��' �� ,r,�,Gy rr1 � � ` �� :� ��4 a!�"'� .�� r �� y.,�� 'F+� � �� ' ��"�� d!, �;"� ��.. � �� +,' � ,.�� __.i�.:�.11 �.� � .:Jliyt . r .. �,. 4 �':� �� .�� YY ,�I � � �� °� - - �� -- � �"_��;��.� '�� . w�� ., � � � � � � "' �=_�� °�.�i-��'� �'+. � �d� `��, � � _ �� . ,�;� . r, , : �,� _� �� . - �' � 4�`� � I�� ,� �, � � �' ,��,�'�"' �� '�._ °�.h `�""_� � .Q .� _ .>x. c�`_ ��-� �'� �" � � „��-° ,�` - „ ; _ : _, �Y +'."-�--� °� �� f"�- �� - � + '�� . , _ ,.-r� I_ � �i,��,l )a�� :�T � u� '�x'��c '_ , , , , ,- . f;� � '�� Valle�"w� _ �Valle wa� �' �� '� , _E ��V�lleyway ��'� � '�Valleyway�' ��p e . _ �� , � �" Y Y� - Y Y _ _.�.�. ,� � i� _�. Y�� yv .i �~ � �� 6 ia, �� '� � ' vl� ��,. _ _�4P' {f�i ,1 �'� � - ��*� --- �1��' ��: �i� � . _'�:_'.° '�. "� '� �w �" _�� r y� �,�r ,,��„ CPA-02-11 -I I� �� `�� ,. � �'± . ��4-- ar-�, �� ! � �-��,, �. tz�^�k !,i : � ;� ' �� "� ,i t��} �'`- , ''� , . � _.; � - _ I � ` W ,�ll�!"' r �, � F il� _ �. r�t� ��1�� ,��!;��- ' '+�y i -- ""- ��L -°�' - � � ' � � A-.��.., �-�jM 3 w ��7�,�+�� R �� . � � f— ��F �� '.°-.s n��, �1,��4�:�,�"��` ` � t • � .� �� A � `_j ��[��^•J � �� wJ� �� ` ��°r� � � ^i. � � � � • fi _ "-��, � _ _ tft�� '�' ae ��,t � ��.` - a� �.� � �� / �� '�'�-�` " .� ��! � � �� n�l J� F. l" ��,�F�� 5 .� �n� ��1°. . I ��fii� ��r�� '�• ~. � �`-��i r� r��'�a, I _'.^!., � y � ��- �a.- r �M { �Yi�L�. �e ,!� S� - p'�`�'.�; -•"xp"�r �� i'', �+�. -T �'�°-��` �� -��`�. � � - �'!" , � : - - ,, . . � , , � . � , �• ��` � ,� _ } �F . :�� . K .�._ � � �'I � .,,,ir�4�-f" � .. . �� ,L'�'�r / 1 ' �: ,��y^4 P 4��r+` . �y � ��1 � ` � � j--.. � l� �_ � �� f T'• � ','r r � �!�'�!,' I 4 '� ' C�" 'S � � I�.•� � ' '--+ � ��' w ,-i-� �•`� r��_ -�� — ^�..� g j�;;* y��d�_ � �; � �J � � 4r � _ � . _ . �' # � � ,� �� . c�X''T rJ,� . „ � � . , r � , �. . . � . ,y-.f '' _ _ ..'�.�� '�r ,��° �'` �" J !� a � � � ,. _ ��" z:. � _ ,�-' . � ,,.� -i�i� ��,� _ ylVIain � ' b� �LS_. �+_." �+'� w ��_ � �r' r�� {� �.�'�'��+�. .' +"'`'�, ,.�!r�h� , � r. f '�r r. . 4 x�L y� � -+, r ` �f. 5`r Y L"r � � � r.^ �/ r� '�.;.�'� �,,�. - y_ 1 _� �k��}� °.��+. dr_ �°,� Rp�r r- � - T � f � t .+� . n�^�� ' �...�..r�f'*��.1c--F � � �;^ �+."�� a! C� �� r � �—_ _ ., ��y� ��-- � �� 6� "� �. �F � ` °� r , : � - 1- � . �. �_. , ��- � � , r*+. ' `i ��' V�c� � r r �y �a " }�r y,� � j � � � ��l.L F�a . � ..�F r' ' �_ �� .. l 1�?f �aF 1$� . r-�- ,iJ. � �N' . � -' i, x � 4 � � � .� �*,� A�" i. ' �k �� "��..�:r� a i � � '��` }`. x � �� s L �� y�, �F�� R�� T �. ��= � { � �Y�.��i�'��i' -� ��A'7F':� �� ,� .�-.i� -�Pv�r.s�i K Ir�i ..A�..�".- _,.�.,� 'x �. . . .�. CPA-02-11 Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map City of Spokane Valley designation from LDR to MDR; subsequent zoning Community Development Department change from R-3 to MF-1. Vicinity Map �t�g � Sh� Sharp � w iBoone Boone � Balfour � w � � �, � �� a � � Desmet w Jamie �� Arthur b �; Cataldo �B Ness �o � p 0 Elementarp 'x � Dean � Broad�w�a� Broadw�a� Broadw�a� � o � w � Spr-i.ngfield � � � o � � '� Spr-ing CPA-02-11 I� � � A-lki � ,x E1.1ki St John St�John Vianney, Vianney Gym b � 0 w � cG V_al.le�uay V_alleyway N.i.xon Main � � Main Main w I� � � o �� w o � I� � Balfour Pai•k `� � CG .b � � � �� o I,a�i >, � '� x 1'sailiut�r i'�erk � �+FI:ID.1#1 Sprague Sprague � l�s{ � 0 � Q Appleway �e�,aY A1�'� � � w � �f �o� �� r� CPA-02-11 Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map City of Spokane Valley designation from LDR to MDR; subsequent zoning Community Development Department change from R-3 to MF-1. Transportation Map � Sharp Sharp � w Boone iBoone Boone Balfour � �o• o � � � � � � � � � Desmet � � � o �Jamie p Cataldo � Gataldo � � Arthur B Ness Elementary ��.�n � .� � .� 0 Broadway � � � w � Springfield � Springfield Springfield -o Q � � a x Alki Alki Alki St John Vianney St John Vianney,Gym � � Valle�vay � Valle�y_ay � �� o' Nixon � CPL�-�2-11 � Main w' Main Main -� � � � -� � Balfour Pa kBalfour P rk � FIRE DIS RICT#1 '� ��, Legend Spr�„e Current Classification State ar Federal Principal Arterial �' � Minor Arterial � Collector � Ca — — • Proposed Principal Arterial Proposed Minar Arterial Appleway — — • Proposed Collectar � � w CPA-02-11 Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map City of Spokane Valley designation from LDR to MDR; subsequent zoning Community Development Department change from R-3 to MF-1. i � CTTY OF ..... .....�. Spol�ane Valley� COMPREHENISVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; and e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. STAFF USE ONLY Date Submitted: ( �°� k� Received by: Fee: I�e�`=°" PLU� #: l��a�c�8�5 File#: ��,Q'�� I( PART II - APPLICATION INFORMATION �t,. � � r � Map Amendment; or ❑ Text Amendment . �, APPLICANT NAME: Iman Vr�4'�► ��" 1�' e��' �n ��/ �-`�. MAILING ADDRESS: ( � O�TrI • CITY: STATE: ZIP: ` PHON : �D FAX P � ( 8� CELL: EMAIL:��9��'��'��t��'�'��'�i��d�''��r��r�•E��"`�'"� PROPERTY OWNER: �Q� , ��AYI �W lV"��(,� G�1�'� STREET ADDRESS: o '`i � W�+I CITY: �l STATE: �, ZIP: � PHON : Z�Q p FAX: CELL: EMAIL: ��t&��C�� `u��,�t�1`��"�a��`� � PARCEL NO: ( SITE ADDRESS: �� VV�a�Yi� �( /�P� ��!+ i COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: t 4 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: �IUVY� 1 � � ZONING DESIGNATION: �"�� I PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: 0 � BRIEFLY EXPLAIN REASON FOR MAP OR TEXT AMENDMENT(2ttaCh2d fUll G'XpIa11at1011 011 S2pat'2t2 Sh2G't Of I paper): � i REVISED 2 2610 Page 3 of 4 I� i i� S`pol�ane Va11eyD COMPREHENISVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION � I� PART III - AUTHORIZATION ! (Signature of legal owner or applicant) I, I, '� 1�. , (print name) swear or affirm that the above responses are ' made truthfu ly and t the best of my knowledge. ; i � �� ,C,�, I� i i nature) (Date) ! � I NOTARY I STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss: COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this � � °� day of �'v��✓ , 20 I� NOTARY SEAL � OTARY SIGNATURE Robe J J� o�y�' Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary Public State nf Washington My Ap�ointmant Expires 04/18/2012 �� Residing at: ��e>�.ti-.Q My appointment expires: �C//��a-�d �� I LEGAL OWNER AUTHORIZATION: If the ap licant is not the legal owner(s), the owner must provide the following acknowledgement; i' I, � ,� , owner of the above described property do hereby authorize_ I !�� 1'l" °�/��I�i to represent me and my interests in all matters regarding this application. REVISED 2/2610 Page 4 of 4 � I �`�""`' COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ' �.�f�l`�� ,� ,4, ,' � `'c'TYO�.ne AMENDMENT APPLICATION p ' � Va�� SVMC 17.80.140 y i Community Development— Planning Division i 11703 E Sprague Ave Suite B-3 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.720.5026 ♦ Fax: 509.688.0037 ♦ planningC�spokanevalley.org I �ti � � Year �� ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN � AMENDMENT PROCESS � The City of �pokane Valley is accepting applications for map and text amendments to the Comprehensive Plan for the 2010 annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment cycle. The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) allows Comprehensive Plan amendments only one time per year. Any interested person, organization, agency or business may submit suggestions, proposals, or requests to the City for changes to the Comprehensive Plan, including maps and text. PROCEDURES 1. Application Period. Applications are due by November 15f of each year to be considered during the next calendar year amendment cycle. Submittals received after the deadline will be considered during the next annual amendment cycle. 2. Staff Review and Report. Spokane Valley Planning Staff will review all applications and will prepare a report and recommendation to the Spokane Valley Planning Commission. The report will analyze how each proposal addresses amendment criteria established by Spokane Valley City j Council in Ordinance 06-020. All application documents and staff reports will be available for public i review. ' 3. Planning Commission Public Hearing. The Spokane Valley Planning Commission will conduct a j formal public hearing on all proposed amendments. The Commission will consider amendments individually and will examine the cumulative impacts of all amendments collectively. The Commission will prepare one recommendation to the Spokane Valley City Council, including findings on each individual proposed amendment. 4. City Council Review and Decision. Within 60 days of receipt of the Planning Commission's recommendation, City Council may choose to adopt the individual amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission, disapprove the amendments, or modify and adopt the proposal. If the Council chooses to substantially modify a proposal, they must either conduct a public hearing or refer the proposal back to the Planning Commission for further consideration. 5. Notice. Each year, the City will provide notice of the annual amendment cycle at least 60 days prior to the application deadline via display ads in local newspapers, email to interested parties and on the City's website. Notice of public hearings and public meetings will be provided to the public as set forth in the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. At a minimum, notice will be provided to surrounding properties ; within 400' for site-specific Land Use Map amendments at least 14 days prior to any public hearing. Notice will also be posted on-site at least 14 days prior to any public hearing. Legal notice will also be published in the newspaper. � 6. Appeal Procedures. City Council decisions on Comprehensive Plan amendments may be appealed to the Eastern Washington Growth Management Hearings Board within 60 days of publication of notice of adoption, in accordance with RCW 36.70A.290(2). 7. Staff Contact. Questions may be directed to Mike Basinger, Senior Planner (mbasinger(c�spokanevalley.orq) or Greg McCormick, Planning Manager (gmccormick(c�spokanevalley.org), 509-921-1000. I I REVISED 2/2610 Page 1 of 4 � CR'Y OF ....... ............ Spol�ane Valley9 COMPREHENISVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION PART I - REQUIRED MATERIAL *"'THE PLANNING DIVISION WILL NOT ACCEPT YOUR APPLICATION IF THE REQUIRED MATERIALS ARE NOT PROVIDED** I A. Submit the following for MAP AMENDMENTS: �] Pre-Application Meeting Request (include copy of staff worksheet from meeting) � �bV. � Completed Application Form Application and SEPA Fee SEPA Checklist: One (1) copy of completed State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) ; Environmental Checklist, inciuding option Non-Project Action supplemental form. (Note: Any � previous environmental documents that are relevant to this project should be included and may � be adopted by reference.) i ❑ Notice of Application packet for 400-foot notification. (Please note: DO NOT submit the ( notice of application packet until you have been contacted by the City. Addresses must be � current within 30 days of the Planning Commission public hearing.) � � One(1) copy of a narrative describing the following: 1. State the reason for the Comprehensive plan Map Amendment. 2. Describe how the proposed changed meets the approval criteria below; a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of RCW 36.70A and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; and e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Describe how the proposal addresses the following specific factors; a. The effect upon the physical environment; b. The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes; c. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding � neighborhoods; ' d. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation and schools; e. The benefit to the neighborhood, city and region; f. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density, and the demand for such land; g. The current and projected population density in the area; and h. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. B. Submit the following for TEXT AMENDMENTS: ❑ Pre-Application Meeting Request (include copy of staff worksheet from meeting) i ❑ Completed Application Form ❑ One (1) copy of the text proposed to be changed,showing deletions by ��°��.�;:;s�#and additions by underline. i ❑ One (1) copy of a narrative describing the following: ' 1. Why the change is needed and the potential land use impacts if approved; 1. Describe how the proposed changed meets the approval criteria below; a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of RCW 36.70A and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; REVISED 2/2610 � Page 2 of 4 � � i i . .. ... ....... . . . . . . ... . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . .. . .... .... . ......... ......... ......... . . i ( I j............. i,.._....._ . I � . . . . - -. :`.. . ..... '. I Briefl�plain Reason for Mab Amendment - Parce145174.2102 is currently zoned R-3,with a Comprehensive Plan designation of Low Density Residential. This parcel serves as a parking lot for St. John Vianney Catholic Church. Parce145174.2103, also owned by St. John Vianney Catholic Church, is the parcel immediately adjacent and to the south of the above-listed Parce145174.2102. This parcel is zoned MF-1,with a Comprehensive Plan designation of Medium Density Residential. St. John Vianney Catholic Church has a goal to create approximately forty (40)housing units for senior citizens on the two parcels listed above. Consistent with Chapter S— Housin�of the City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Goal HG-3 states "Encourage meeting the housing needs of special populations including the elderly..." Policy HP-3.5 states "Encourage the location of new facilities for the special populations identified above within one-quarter mile of transit corridors. " Sprague Avenue, exactly one-quarter mile south of the proposed site, is a major public transit corridor. � � The subject parcel (seeking to be changed from an R-3 Low Density Residential � designation to a MF-1 Medium Density Residential designation) is necessary as an MF-1 in order to achieve the Parish goal of providing a safe, affordable inventory of housing ' for senior citizens. By means of a Boundary Line Adjustment between the two parcels, a � single parcel of approximately 2.7 acres in an MF-1 zone, Medium Density Residential, j can achieve 32 housing units. Through providing housing to low-income seniors,bonus I residential densities can be achieved. In addition,through providing site amenities that benefit the public, in accordance with SVMC 19.35.040,plus the bonus density of low- income housing, a final unit total of fifty-one (51) units could be achieved on the site. The future project contemplates forty (40)units. i i i � I �I i �; Narrative to describe the followin�: i 1. Reason for the Com�rehensive Plan Map Amendment: St. John Vianney Catholic Parish wishes to develop land that is adjacent to the church and elementary school on their campus into a project to provide housing for senior citizens. The church owns the parcel on which they are requesting a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment, as well as the adjacent parcels to the north, south and west. To the east is a public street: Walnut Road. In order to assemble the land parcels so they are adequate for the future housing project, a Boundary Line Adjustment is necessary between Parcels#45174.2102 and#45174.2103. Currently Parcel#45174.2102 is designated R-3, LDR. In order to achieve the multi-unit senior citizen housing project,the Comprehensive Plan designation need to be changed to � MF-1,MDR. 2. Describe how the pro�osed chan�e meets the ap�roval criteria below: a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare and protection of the environment. If the subject site is zoned to a higher density, in accordance with the Washington ; State Growth Management Act(GMA) (RCW 36.70A.020 (2) ) '� multi-family development will be enabled to occur in close proximity to already i established centers and corridors with services and public transit. b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements ofRCW.36.70A and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment. City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 5-Housing 5.1 Plannin� Context. 5.1.1 Washington State Growth Mana�ement Act states the following: The Washington State Growth Management Act provides the following guidance applicable to housing and neighborhoods: I Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities i and services exist or can be provide in an efficient manner. Reduce inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling, low-density development. I� � Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population of this state, and promote a variety of residential densities. � The subject site,Parcel#45174,2102, if enabled to become MF-1, MDR, will '� fulfill the above-stated goals. Higher density housing for low-income senior 'i � i ; I � citizens will be developed in close proximity public facilities and services along Sprague Avenue. c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies. Not applicable d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error ' Not applicable ' e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Not applicable 3. Describe how the proposal addresses the following specific factors: a. The effect upon the physical environment. Higher density housing in close proximity to already-established centers and corridors (in this case Sprague Avenue)preserves undeveloped land and reduces i inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling, low-density development. b. The effect on open space, str�eams, rivers and lakes. Not applicable c. The compatability with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods. ; In accordance with the Cit�ofSpokane Vallev Comprehensive Plan: Chapter S— ; Housin�, S.1 Plannin�Context, "GMA further requires that a housing element ensuring the vitality and character of established residential neighborhoods that includes: Identification of sufficient land area for the number of needed housing units, including government assisted housing, housing for low income and special needs housing." If the subject site becomes MF-1, MDR,via the Comprehensive Plan Amendment � process,the above-stated goal will have been achieved. The new zoning will � allow for in-fill in a nearly urban setting of inedium-density housing for low- income senior citizens. d. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, ( public tr�ansportation,parks, recreation and schools. At the time of application for a Building Permit, a concurrency study will be I undertaken. Undetermined as of yet,however,public services along Sprague � Avenue, less than a quarter mile to the south of the subject site, are plentiful. � I ; e. The benefit to the neighborhood, city and region. � Senior citizens provide an enduring, stabilizing fabric to a neighborhood. This neighborhood has the benefit of a K-8 school along with a church as cornerstones to the subject site. Through the Comp Plan Amendment and zoning change that will enable construction of housing for the elderly, enhancement to the neighborhood, city and region will be realized. ( f. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and �I density, and the demand for such land. Following a BLA for the two parcels slated to become the site for the future senior citizen housing development, a single parcel of approximately 2.7 acres will exist. Per SVMC 19.40.070, a zoning designation of MF-1 allows twelve (12)units per acre. When a Residential Bonus Density is utilized,per SVMC 19.35.040,with specific steps and public amenities incorporated into the future project, approx. ' fifty-one (51) housing units are allowed. The project being contemplated by St. John Vianney Catholic Parish is planning forty (40) senior housing units. f. Discuss the current and projected population density in the area. I' From information taken from the demographics report found at , www.selects�okane.com (Spokane Regional Site Selector and Property Locator), ; the current (2010)population indicates a total of 9,599 persons living within a one-mile radius of the subj ect parcel. The proj ected population within a one-mile �, radius of the subject site in the year 2015 is for a projected total of 9,556 persons. g. Discuss the effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan � It is anticipated that the Comprehensive Plan Amendment being sought(to change the zoning and land use designation of Parcel#45174.2102 from R-3 LDR to MF-1 MDR) will not have an effect on other parts of the Plan. i i �, � �; .� �� . . . `� i , � �,: � r�� r ,� � . , � ,t ,� � _ � . . � s � .,� ,� � � ' ` � .��µ...� , k*.�„�... : . �` � �� ;. � Ca �, � � ,. ;,�,� ��.'� R ' w t�"i . '"� " *` � . � � eK � � ,, �� '� �,y . �,� � � ,� � � 4 z k Y� a°�?�� -- ��.. �-=� � .. � � ,5�;-❑. , � + � ' .� .,iz.. ' �' . � „ �� x. s ri,.�; " �� ' 1"i4� �i�� ` �:a �,� x-� � � .� a � ;� �: � ac . � . "� -� °"`� t ` . �„ � s� ��` �=, �� '.. �b �-, .., � �� - . . . _'__ ,, . � �. ,„ . . " . ,' � :'��it�s. ...,�-.. .f� � . „ ,. . ._ _ r.` , , ... 3`:.. ".; i � . _. s�� . �' � J^ .. :._,.., 4s..' ,n.: '* � 4�� . . . ..... .., ��_� ..�. ._. �_ .si'r� . ..�, `Y �ry • �. . .S. ..� �, .�^�; ' �. . .... � +� k...: . .r. + M _ � � g � �� 4� 4.�#� si��pi ,.- .. 4 1 �{ .'� J�yk� � f.�i �� . t Y � t ;A � Jra � ', r , .� Y� 't : n � � : i�� . _If'+il ti� r�. y�S,1 � � ;�1' �? 3�" �=' �f' � � � z �.; '� i ,. €t �"�" ` ,4_< � ° PA�RG�* #451'IBA903,,,�._' F Y� — ��-,�.�, ".�,.,: � �` .'iF�� .-�.�" a ` •`� <� r,a �,- �< . r 1 ��' f.y„ '�, �'�'t^ � � �� , � � r„�` , z.�� % �"q. ' �»� r � ±` � " a(laYt y Av � � �,xy� �. w ��,,: .,..,�e , ` �... a - r ,, � & ` �, r� � �� .�, i � � Architecture � s " x tn '"`��`�Y ��, � �+�: � �t , ,��'' . . � Planning .�� ,, ,.� . .y !� � JtiV � =�r . �� :. �� ; : :3 Y*�; interior vesign � -� ��;�� r � • . r k°�'_ . cti+ �5; .�� ,4,-.. � � - -r �i . ''�.� � � � �� ''t " .p � NORTHi00STEV�J:S PARI'viDEPWl� SPoIUNE,N'M1SY!INGT04 99201 :.�f ��`0�. � Z � y §�, " ° . .' �. � ' ,,°' . �v � 5�918393101 FAX 509 8961185 �. — Q , � �� r "°R'" ST. .10HN VIf�NN�Y "" ;^ � „ �, ,� �`��°��`��`�� z' S1TE PLAN GOMP.PLAN AN9ENDMENT 'K� .�� 4�� ,.3. 3�... �`- r 4.U'.3.�Y �`�. a .k . : ScnL[.1"=too`-0" r�pg N.WALNUT,SPOIC4NE VALLEY,WA 99�14 5rE PLAN 11-15-10 �� i � ( � ,� � ��°� t� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT �'"' PLANNING DIVISION ' �+�� Determination of Non-Signi�'icance (DI�TS) , � � I PROPOSAL: CPA-02-11 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Site-specific comprehensive plan map amendment to change the designation on parcel 45174.2102 from Low Density Residential with an R-3 zoning designation to Medium Density Residential with an MF-1 zoning designation. �PL�C�vT:Ann Martin, Heylman Martin Architects; 100 North Stevens Street; Spokane, WA 99201 OWNER: St. John Vianney Catholic Parish; 503 North Walnut Road; Spolcane Valley, 99206 LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:Parce145174.2102; addressed as 503 North Walnut Road; further located in the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 17, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. LEAD AGENCY: Spokane Valley The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other � information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. DETERMINATION: i ❑ There is no comment period for this DNS. � This DNS is issued using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. There is no further j comment period on the DNS. j ❑ This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2);the lead agency will not act on his proposal for � 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by � i RESPONSIBLE OF�C��,: Kathy McClung, Community Development Director; 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106; Spokane Valley, WA 99206; (509) 720-5300 � DATE ISSUED: February 4, 2011 SIGNATURE: APPE�,: An appeal of this determination shall be submitted to the Community Deve opment Department within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date issued. The appeal must be written and make specific factual objections to the City's threshold determination. Appeals shall be conducted in conformance with Section 17.90 (Appeals) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code, and any required fees pursuant to the City's adopted Fee Scheduled shall be paid at time of appeal submittal. Pursuant to WAC 197-11m680, appeals shall be limited to a review of a final threshold determination. City of Spokane Valley February 4,2011 Determination of Non-Significance(DNS) Page 1 of 2 CPA-02-11 I � � THIS DNS WAS MAILED TO: ( Applicant ( Owner � City of Liberty Lake, Community Development City of Spokane, Planning Services �i, Spokane County, Boundary Review Board I Spokane County, Building and Planning I Spokane County Division of Utilities—Info Svc Spolcane County, Clean Air Agency Spokane County, Fire District No. 1 � Spokane County, Fire District No. 8 I Spokane County, Regional Health District � Spokane Transit Authority (STA) I,' Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) �i Washington State Department of Ecology(Spokane) � Washington State Department of Ecology (Olympia) � City of Spokane Valley February 4,2011 Determination of Non-Significance(DNS) Page 2 of 2 CPA-02-11 I i ; ; ; � � Karen Kendall � From: Deanna Griffith Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 3:15 PM To: Karen Kendall Subject: FW: Proposed Project St. John Vianney Church: Comment for our Com Plan amendment I Y P �eawwa ' I From: Chris Thompson On Behalf Of City Hall Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 1:55 PM ' To: Deanna Griffith Subject: Preposed Project St. John Vianney Church: ! Dea�na, I Can you please forward to the appropriate person? �, Thanks, Chris I�i Christine lfhos�pson City of Spokane Valley � 11707 E. Sprague Ave., Ste. 106 Spokan�Vall�y, 99206 Direct: (509) 720-5110 Fax: (509) 921-1008 cthompsonCa7spokanevalle�.org, Web: www.spokanevall�y.orq (Contents of this email and reply are subject to public disclosure) � From: bailey51103@comcast.net fmailto;bai1�51103@comcast.netl � Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 1:43 PM � To: City Hall � Subject: Cell# Preposed Project St. John Vianney Church: To Whom it May Concern: � i By way of this e-mail, I would like to express my concerns regarding the new project @ St. John Vianney Church located @ 503 N. Walnut Road. , I am a home owner on the corner of Valleyway and Herald and would be directed impacted IF I Valleyway is made a through street. Valleyway is presently a Bus Route for small elementary school �� children. The increase in traffic would be a safety issue and of great concern for many parents in the local neighborhood. As a home owner, I am also extremely concerned about the increase in traffic and possible loss of value to my primary residence and greatest asset. � � If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at the e-mail address listed above. �,, I Thank You � i , i Maria Naccarato i Cell# 509-638-5743 � i ( ( ; i � ( i , z i I � Karen Kendall From: Deanna Griffith Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 3:14 PM � To: Karen Kendall ; Subject: FW: Forward to Planning Commission ' I Comments far you. I �e�wwa From: Chris Thompson On Behalf Of City Hall 9ent: Monday, February 14, 2011 12:19 PM To: Deanna Griffith 9ubject: FW: Forward to Planning Commisson Christine Thorrtpson City of 5pokane Vailey 11707 E. 5prague Ave., Ste. 106 Spokane Valley, 99206 Direct: (509) 720-5110 Fax: (509) 921�1008 cthompson ,spokanevalle�.orq Web: www.spokanevalley.orq (Contents of this emafl and reply are subject to publtc disclosure) From: Stevens, Shelly (RBC Wealth Mgmt)jmailto:shelly.stevens@rbc.coml. 9ent: Monday, February 14, 2011 11:41 AM To: City Hall Subject: Forward to Planning Commisson RE: 40 unit low rise senior housing on Walnut Road and Valleyway. Please do not allow Valleyway to turn into a through street based on this project. Valleyway currently dead ends on Farr and on Wainut, please see that is stays that way. Thanks so much for your consideration I live at 312 North Walnut Road Spokane Valley WA 99206 SFieCCy L. Stevens j Investment Associate � Spokane�rancFi Office so9-363-sso9 RBC Wealth Management does not accept buy, sell, or cancel orders by e-mail, or any instructions by e-mail that would require your 1 � � signature. Information contained in this communication is not considered an official record of your account and does not supersede normal trade confirmations or statements . Any information provided has been prepared from sources believed to be reliable but is not � guaranteed, does not represent all available data necessary for making investment decisions and is for informational purposes only. ' This message is intended only for residents of the states in which the sender is registered as applicable to the content . This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations . Any distribution, use, or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you receive this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Information received by or sent from this system is subject to review by supervisory personnel, is retained and may be produced to regulatory authorities or others with a legal right to the information. Unless specified by the sender, e-mail messages are not encrypted. As such, client sensitive information sent to or received from your RBC Wealth Management Financial Consultant electronically may not be secure. With respect to the companies that are the subject of an equity research report not authored by our firm that is included in this electronic mail message, RBC Wealth Management is required to disclose � to you certain conflicts of interest. Any such disclosures may be � obtained by either accessing our web site at � I https : //www. rbccm. com/GLDisclosure/PublicWeb/DisclosureLookup. aspx?EntityID =2 or by mailing a request for such information to RBC Wealth Management Research Publishing, 60 South Sixth Street, Mailstop P18, Minneapolis, MN 55402 . RBC Wealth Management, a division of RBC Capital Markets Corporation. j Member NYSE/FINRA/SIPC. ( I 2 CONIMUNTTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTDZENT PLANNING DIVISION �`�pokane STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE �[J�� PLANNING COMMISSION �� CPA-03-11 STAFF REPORT DATE: Febrilal'y 17, 2011 HEax�NG DaTE ANn LocaT�oN: February 24, 2011, beginning at 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 101, Spokane Valley, Washington 99206. PxoPOSAL DESC�uPT�oN: City initiated, comprehensive plan amendment to remove the entire Sprague and Appleway Revitalization Plan (SARP) and associated zoning designations and return those areas to the City of Spokane Valley zoning in effect on October 15, 2009. Associated Comprehensive Plan and Development Code text Amendments necessary to remove all reference to the Subarea Plan are also considered. PxoPOSAL LocATioN: The amendment area includes all properties located within the Subarea Plan. Generally, the plan area consists of approximately 1000 acres of properties lining along and located in between the Sprague Ave. and the Appleway Boulevard rights-of-way, and extending west from Interstate 90 to just east of Sullivan Road. The area generally lies between E. Main Ave./E Riverside Ave. to the north and E. 4th Ave. to the south. See Exhibit 4 for the exact location. APPLicaNT: Ciry of Spokane Valley Communiry Development Department, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206. APPxovaL CiuTERia: Chapter 2 (Urban Land Use) of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Title 17 (General Provision), Title 19 (Zoning Regulations), Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) . SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION: Tlle Planning Division has not provided a recommendation to approve or deny the proposaL The Commission should review the information and discuss the impacts of eliminating the Subarea Plan as described in CPA-03-11. STAFF PLANNER: LORI BARLOW, AICP, Associate Planner, Community Development Depal'tment xEV�EwE�sy: ScoTT KuxTA, AICP, Planning Manager, Community Development Department EXHIBITS: Exhibit 1: SARP Area Exhibit 2 Existing Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations Map Exhibit 3: Proposed Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations Map Exhibit 4: Existing Zoning Map Exhibit 5: Proposed Zoning Map Exhibit 6: Associated SVMC Code Text Amendments StaffReport and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-03-11 Page 1 of 10 L BACKGROUND INFORMATION The Subarea Plan was developed in response to the community's desire to reverse the visual and economic decline of the Sprague and Appleway Corridor, restore the area as a viable commercial area within the communiry, and plan for the development of the City Center for the Ciry of Spokane Valley. The plan provides the implementing regulations to achieve the desired change along the corridor, and also identifies corresponding public and private investments necessary for the plan goals to be accomplished. A major component of the city actions included plans to reconfigure portions of Sprague Avenue to a two-lane, two- way street with wide sidewalks, and extend Appleway Boulevard, also as a two-way street. The reconfiguration of streets was intended to reverse the negative impacts to business resulting from the one way street configuration, as well as make the area pedestrian friendly. The Plan was based on the broad policies established in the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan for a new City Center and mixed-use/commercial development along the corridor. Planning for the Subarea plan began in 2006 with community focus group meetings and followed by public meetings. After several years of effort the plan was formally adopted by Ordinance 09-013. Subsequent to plan adoption, Council directed staff to review the plan on a zone by zone basis with affected property owners, business operators and interested citizens. As a result of the zone district review, changes were considered to the plan as code text amendments, with other changes to be docketed as a comprehensive plan amendment during the annual amendment process. Subsequent to the complete review of the Subarea Plan, the Council determined that the Plan no longer conformed with the policy direction of the Council and directed staff to begin the process to remove the Plan in its entirety. Prior to the beginning of the annual amendment process the City Center portion of the plan was eliminated by an Emergency Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Ordinance 11-001. APPL�cATION PxocESS�NG: Chapter 17.80 Permit Processing Procedures in the Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC). The following summarizes key application procedures for the proposal. Pre-Application Meeting: N/A Application Submitted: N/A Determination of Completeness: N/A Issuance of Determination of Non-Significance (DNS): February 4, 2011 End of Appeal Period for DNS: February 18, 2011 Date of Published Notice of Public Hearing: February 4, 2011 Date of Mailed Notice of Public Hearin : N/A Date of Public Hearing: February 24, 2011 PROPERTY INFORMATION GENERAL : Size and Characteristics: The plan area consists of approximately 1000 acres of privately and publicly owned properties. The area is relatively flat. No environmentally sensitive areas are known to exist within the plan area. Existin�Comprehensive Gateway Commercial Centers, Gateway Commercial Avenue, Plan Land Use Communiry Boulevard, Neighborhood Centers, and Mixed Use Designations: Avenue; (Note: City Center area was redesignated as Mixed Use Avenue by an Emergency Comprehensive Plan Amendment — Ordinance 11-001) StaffReport and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-03-11 Page 2 of 10 P�oposed Comprehensive Regional Commercial, Community Commercial, Office, Medium Plan Land Use Designations Density Residential, Corridor Mixed Use, High Density Residential, (Oct. 15, 2009 Parks/Open Space Designations): Existin�Zoning: Gateway Commercial Center, Gateway Commercial Avenue, Community Boulevard, Neighborhood Center, and Mixed Use Avenue; (Note: City Center area was rezoned Mixed Use Center by Ordinance 11-0002) Proposed Zoning (Oct 15, Community Facilities, Regional Commercial, Multi-Family-1, 2009 Zoning): Corridor Mixed Use, I-2, Heavy Industrial, Community Commercial, and Multi-Family 2. Existin�Land Use: The corridor is predominantly occupied by commercial and retail oriented uses. At major intersections along the corridor, such as Pines and Argonne-Mullan, the uses are generally office type uses in the north and south direction from Sprague. The uses south of Appleway R.O.W. are a mix of residential and limited commercial. Major intersections along the corridor are developed with neighborhood retail, and the area west of Argonne-Mullan contains mostly auto dealers and auto related commercial and service type uses. SURROUNDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN,ZONING,AND LAND USES: North Comprehensive Plan—Predominantly Low, Medium and High Density Residential; Heavy Industrial, Community Commercial and Office Zoning — R-3, R-4, MF-1 and MF-2; Garden Office and Office, Community Commercial, and I-2, Heavy Industrial Existing Land Uses — Predominantly Residential with commercial and Office uses along the major intersections of Sprague South Comprehensive Plan — Predominantly Medium and High Density Residential; Community Commercial and Corridor Mixed Use Zoning—MF-1 and MF-2; Office, CMU and Community Commercial Existing Land Uses —Predominantly Residential East Comprehensive Plan —Low, Medium and High Density Residential; and Community Commercial Zoning—R-4, MF-1 and MF-2; Community Commercial Existing Land Uses —Commercial, Office and Residential West Comprehensive Plan—Heavy Industrial, Regional Commercial and Office Zoning—I-2, Office and MF-2 Existing Land Uses —Commercial, Office and Residential II. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA Findings: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC), the lead agency has determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 4321C.030(2)(c). The Planning Division issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) for the proposal. This decision StaffReport and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-03-11 Page 3 of 10 was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Conclusion(s): The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act and Title 21 of the SVMC have been fulfilled by the submittal of the required SEPA Checklist, and the issuance of the City's threshold determination consisting of a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). III. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT A. COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE 17 (GENERAL PROVISIONS) OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE Findings: Section 17.80.140 H. (Comprehensive Plan Amendment A�roval Criterial Spokane Vallev Municipal C ode 1. The following are responses to the proposed comprehensive plan amendment; a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. The City proposes an amendment due to the deterioration of the economy and opposition to the implementation of the plan. The public has conveyed to the Council, with written comment and verbal testimony their belief that the S'ubarea plan creates an additional layer of regulation that in their opinion results in unwarranted project design and development costs not desired by the community. The costs create a financial burden to property and business owners, which in combination with the current economic conditions, has stifZed, rather than stimulated, development within the subarea. The proposed amendment reduces the amount of regulations, creates a more fZexible environment for developers, and eliminates the restrictive corridor identity established in the Subarea plan. However, if the plan is eliminated the conditions along the corridor may remain unchanged, with the expectation that vacancies and property disinvestment could continue. If the cycle continues properties will become increasingly more disadvantaged. This proposal has no potential impact on the safety of the community. It can be concluded that the vocal consensus of the community does not support the subarea plan goals and policies, and therefore eliminating the plan will support the health and welfare of the community by returning the area to its previous Comprehensive Plan Land Use designations and zoning. However, it also can be concluded that eliminating the plan does not address the declining conditions that are recognized along the corridor, and the continuation of the decline is contrary to the health and welfare of the community. b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the Ciry's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; StaffReport and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-03-11 Page 4 of 10 RCW 36.70A, The Growth Management Act, (GMA) requires cities and counties to adopt comprehensive plans and development regulations that are consistent with thirteen statewide planning goals. RCW 36.70A.080 authorizes jurisdictions to adopt optional elements and subarea plans. A subarea plan is not a required element, but one that is allowed so long as it is consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted comprehensive plan. The GMA planning goals require citizen participation and coordination to be a part of the plan development and allows for amendments to occur on an annual basis. The proposed amendment would eliminate the subarea plan, and amend the comprehensive plan in part, while retaining the goals and policies that directed the development of the subarea plan within the comprehensive plan. The proposed amendment to eliminate the plan is based on public dissatisfaction with the plan. Public comment has indicated that the development of the plan was based on a fraction of input from the community and does not represent the community's interests. The public comment received does not dispute the general direction of the goals and policies found within the Comprehensive Plan, but contends the Subarea plan developed is not what the community envisioned. Alternatively, other members of the community contend that the plan should not be abandoned recognizing that change is anticipated over a long period of time and that it is premature to determine that the plan will not provide the expected results. Regardless of the opposing opinions, the conclusion can be drawn that the elimination of the subarea plan will not cause the comprehensive plan to be inconsistent with the GMA, and it will not cause the development regulations to be inconsistent with the goals and policies of the plan. Retaining the goals and policies within the plan regarding the development of a city center and revitalization of the Sprague Corridor will allow the community to develop a plan and corresponding regulations in line with current community preference. c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies. Over 1,100 properties are located within the Sprague and Appleway Corridor Plan area. The amendment does not respond to any change in conditions to individual properties but is in response to the consensus of vocal citizens and property owners who contend that the plan does not refZect the needs and/or desires of the community, that the design standards within the form based code are not practical to apply to existing development, and that additional regulations have become a deterrent to developers considering the corridor. However, two specific conditions have changed since the adoption of the plan. First, the council has eliminated the city center portion of the plan as an emergency comprehensive plan amendment. Second, the City has not resolved the issues that would enable the City to acquire the Appleway right-of-way making it possible to extend Appleway in the future, as well as impeding the ability of those affected property owners to meet the requirements for frontage improvements concurrent with development. Two conclusions may be drawn from the latter statement: The first is that those properties may be unfairly burdened until the right of way is improved; and the second conclusion is that the principals of the plan are working by insuring that Appleway does not continue to develop as the "Back door of Sprague. " StaffReport and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-03-11 Page 5 of 10 It can be concluded that a shift in the economic climate, community support, and obstacles to obtaining the Appleway right-of-way have lead to a substantial change in conditions. d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or The proposed amendment does not correct a mapping error. e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendment does not address a deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The City must also consider the following factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan amendments: a. The effect upon the physical environment; The comprehensive plan amendment is a non project action under SEPA and has no identifiable impact on the environment. Development regulations in conjunction with environmental review ensure that all project related adverse impacts are mitigated at the time of development. b. The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes; There is no surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of subarea. Balfour Park is the only designated open space within the proposed amendment area. There are no impacts anticipated. c. The compatibiliry with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; The proposed amendment is to return the land use designations and zoning to those in place prior to the implementation date of the Subarea Plan on Oct. 1 S, 2009. The designations and zoning were established consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan adopted on April 25, 2006. Development regulations address impacts anticipated due to incompatible uses and SEPA provides the tool to address impacts not anticipated by regulations. Since the amendment proposes to restore land use designations and associated zoning to that which was previously in place, the status quo will be maintained, and no impacts are anticipated. d. The adequacy of and impact on communiry facilities including utilities, roads,public transportation,parks, recreation, and schools; The City of Spokane T�alley addresses the adequacy of community facilities on a citywide basis through capital facilities planning. Policy CFP-9.1 of the Comprehensive Plan recommends a concurrency management system for tr�ansportation, sewer, and water facilities. At the time of the submittal of the building permit application, an additional SEPA review would likely be required to evaluate the impacts of the use(s) and proposed structure(s) on the physical environment in regards to transportation and schools. However the community has noted that the Sprague Avenue and Appleway Boulevard configured as a one-way str�eet have negatively impacted business, and that too few north- south connections exist to conveniently provide access to business on either street. The limited connections and fast travel speeds of the thru-traffic create unfriendly and dangerous conditions for pedestrians. Book II.• Development Regulations, and Book III.• City Actions address these conditions, but to this date no measures have been implemented or projects StaffReport and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-03-11 Page 6 of 10 initiated that would bring about change. As a result of eliminating the plan, the conditions noted may remain unchanged. Traffic Studies completed for the EIS by Glatting.Iackson and Associates prior to the plan adoption have shown that reconfiguring Sprague Avenue and Appleway Boulevard would have marginal impact on the level of service. Eliminating the plan does not create, nor address known impacts, but allows for conditions to continue. e. The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region; The proposal would restore many uses within the subarea neighborhoods to that of a conforming status and restore commercial entitlements to properties that were rezoned. However, studies prepared by Eco-northwest indicated that the city has a surplus inventory of vacant and available commercial and office properties. Shopping trends indicated a consumer preference for anchor based shopping centers located at major crossroads which led to the underutilization of the commercial zoned properties. The Subarea plan zoning established a pattern of centers, boulevard and avenue segments in keeping with contemporary consumer and investor preference. The shift of entitlements within the plan attempted to reposition the corridor properties to capture value in the contemporary market place. Eliminating the plan will restore commercial entitlements contributing to the surplus of commercial properties. A benefit to the city may be realized by deciding the fate of the Subarea Plan in a final fashion as the continued controversy creates an uncertain climate for developers. £ The quantiry and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land; The S'ubarea plan contains approximately 1,000 acres of underutilized land. The proposal would return all acreage to the October I5, 2009 land use designations and zoning. The EIS prepared for the Subarea Plan noted that in general, there is not a significant difference between the "terms of envisioned growth"for the corridor and the land uses established within the Spokane T�alley Comprehensive Plan. Under either scenario, SARP, or pre-SARP Sprague Avenue will take many years to transform from strip retail to a mixed-use avenue. However the combination of form based zoning and the reconfiguration of Sprague and Appleway was intended to provide a foundation for redevelopment. A few differences are noted from the report: First, the mixed use vision for the Sprague corridor is similar under both alternatives (pre SARP and SARP) in that it allows a mix of uses. The subarea plan regulations require compatible building types, with regulations that control the building form,placement and architectural design of buildings. The current zoning regulations (in this case zoning prior to October 1 S, 2009) are use-based considering primarily use and bulk standards, such as minimum setbacks, height limits and maximum coverage requirements. Second, the subarea plan concentrated like uses into centers and segments. The elimination of the plan will allow commercial development essentially up and down the corridor increasing the amount of land available for generalized commercial uses. The elimination of the Community Boulevard District will return the zoning such that generally commercial uses are StaffReport and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-03-11 Page 7 of 10 allowed on the north side ofAppleway Boulevard and residential uses allowed on the south side. Last, regulating the design of buildings was intended to encourage a mixed use environment. Residential development along Sprague is less likely to occur when the zoning code is use- based, and not form- based. g. The current and projected population density in the area; and According to the EIS prepared for the Subarea Plan, impacts to population, housing and employment were not anticipated to be more significant than the impacts evaluated during th�e adoption of the Spokane T�alley Comprehensive Plan.(SVCP) Both the Subarea plan and the SVCP encourage residential growth along the corridor, however the subarea promotes higher density apartments and townhouses. The subarea plan analysis predicted an increase in employment,particularly in the City Center area. Since the City Center designation has been removed, and more commercial entitlements would be restored up and down the corridor, the strip commercial land use pattern is expected to continue. If the pattern of vacancies continues, a decrease in employment will be expected. h. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposal would eliminate the mapped area and zoning associated with the Subarea plan. The pre-SARP land use designations were consistent with the goals and policies within the SVCP at the time of adoption, and remain consistent. The mixed use vision for Sprague Avenue is similar under the Subarea plan, and the previous land use designations. However, mixed use development may be less likely to occur under the use based zoning. B. COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE 19 (ZONING REGULATIONS) OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE Findings: Section 19.110.020 (S�ra�ue A�lewav Corridors Subarea Plan) S�okane Vallev Munici�al Code The Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment includes the proposal to eliminate zoning associated with the Sprague and Appleway Corridors Subarea Plan and replace the zoning for affected properties with the zoning that was in effect on October 15, 2009. All references to the Subarea Plan and its authority are proposed to be removed from the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. The following sections of the SVMC are proposed to be amended: Title 19 Zoning Regulations, section 19.110.020 and 19.140.010; Title 5 Business Licenses and Regulations, Chapter 5.10 Adult Entertainment Establishments; and Appendix D, Spokane Valley Sprague and Appleway Corridors Subarea Plan. Conclusion(s): Rezoning the properties within the subarea to be consistent with the proposed land use designation would not result in any inconsistencies with Title 19 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. Any non-conforming uses that existed prior to the adoption of the Subarea Plan, would likely be nonconforming at the time the proposed zoning became effective. C. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Section I of Ordinance # 09-013, which amends the Comprehensive Plan Map and adopts the Land Use Designations set forth in the Sprague and Appleway Subarea Plan, identifies in great detai141 supporting StaffReport and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-03-11 Page 8 of 10 Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies. The Subarea plan is supported by the Comprehensive Plan goals and policies. However, based on public input and council direction the subarea plan is not representative of the community's vision, nor the Council's policy direction. Section 3 of Ordinance#07-015 which adopts Title 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22 as portion of city of Spokane Valley Uniform Development Code identifies in detail that the Development Regulations are consistent with numerous Goals and Policies from Chapter 1 Introduction, Chapter 2, Land Use, Chapter 3 — Transportation, Chapter 5 —Housing, Chapter 6,- Private and Public Utilities, Chapter 7- Economic Development, Chapter 8 - Natural Environment, Chapter 9—Parks, Recreation and the Arts and Chapter 10 Neighborhoods of the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore it can be concluded that the proposed zoning regulations are consistent with the comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies. Goal EDG -7 of the Comprehensive Plan states, " Maintain a regulatory environment that offers flexibility, consistency,predictability and clear direction." The continuation of the sub area plan creates an unpredictable environment for developers as staff struggles to implement the regulations contained within the plan consistent with the policy direction of the council. D. FINDING AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO PUBLIC COMMENTS Findings: Staff has received no written public comment concerning the proposal as a result of the comprehensive plan amendment noticing requirements to date. However, at the direction of Council, staff conducted a review of the plan by hosting 5 public meetings between May 2010 and September 2010. Both written and verbal comments were received during the process. As a result of the comments, council addressed issues through the code text amendment process, and then added the remaining issues to the annual comprehensive plan docket for further consideration. Conclusion(s): Adequate public noticing was conducted for CPA-03-11 in accordance with adopted public noticing procedures. E. FINDING AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO AGENCY COMMENTS Findings: Staff has not received any agency comments to date. Conclusion(s): No concerns are noted. IV. OVERALL CONCLUSION Considerable analysis was completed during the adoption of the Subarea Plan. The Plan was determined to adequately establish the planning and design framework to restore the vitaliry, functionality, and beauty of the Sprague and Appleway Corridor consistent with the free-market and community's vision. While the plan was built on public participation and governmental support, it appears that the vision within the plan may no longer be supported by the community and current council. The Plan is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. However, the plan is intended to be a living document and as such should respond to the visions and preference of the community and its leaders. RCW 36.70A.130 of the Growth StaffReport and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-03-11 Page 9 of 10 Management Act identifies the review process and schedule for annual updates acknowledging that revisions are necessary to address changing conditions within communities. This process has been followed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION No recommendation is provided. The Planning Commission should consider the information within the staff report and discuss the merits of eliminating the plan as it relates to the public health and welfare of the community. The Commission should forward their recommendation, along with findings of fact to the Council for their consideration. StaffReport and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-03-11 Page 10 of 10 �� :iiiii a // ■1 1��\ ,`z *� .ii%%i �� .�1.. � ;°%j'i a�l��!' ■�� ^��,,..'`, . . ,� 11�-•�� . ..°a``" .. �/ / /� /��11 . ��r�/��\ . �, ' �y�-�H,� + i ,'"i� �I■- . � �� IIIL '�� r.a\� 1 �e . i�',-•i� i '�� 1HtIIHT]m1�LJ�' i � _.,.,�:, ;�� ■ LT E°[6� ' rt�l� 1, , ., '.� . .��. : ri � .."� '� u�P" �",/ j �. e.- --�c-rrrtrrrnrm� 711�� ,— •• � .'„?FnTI� � e_ t �.� ' � e r �� n",� .r. nia�7 � � - �! "'�� : ITL: .� ;,�� , -!.� � ; »c"�, � �II�� .. 1.� �II� l��I":.'�� _ �� p�k ��. ��- � �u4»�� - �y�� n»» =tiiY» __- �,�� 7�_� »> �,�cc � .. � m ,..e1 . ;` �f i � r�� _�,U�� _E rF��t l�`0.j�� r� �� -�_[�[m»»_______C[�[�J�-r=2 ;U'_ [�[C=c� :i�� :. � i% :C.-., � __„�'"�� a�7 6 1�$s� � �f � _ �J "�- c ��i� m�I .� i��i%1i;:;%'_%�� sc � . ( [� i��. `�� `�7�]�)______C[CCC�]�] �1�� dy8908'L ",.._`\� ��%�/ /�/i�/�- � ��]; � � ¢____ CCCCC7� �n �-'-_JI� � / � - a�]�n �]�C[LZC[L�l 'J ___ � �1��.:� C�cT a��C � �-FG�C j .°>�� - �� ! ' � Ct_�� ',v?tJ � ,.. I�. `__t�aur \ .��\�. n»»-__ C-Ct[[C73�71-- �teG'c[� Cf�r_r�7 -S� _ �d �'=ecC' � * ��\:. mJ ,,::\: ,iI!�I�III� r �� I�� c�, �E:�_ ;, NeighborhoodCenters GatewayCommercialAve �Office ��Lightlndustrial `�� Mixed Use Avenue Community Boulevard �City Center -Heavy Industrial \;�� Mixed Use Center Low Density Residential ;;;;;;;;;; Neighborhood Commercial Park/Open Space � Echibit 2-Esisting Comprehensive Plan Neee �Corridor Mixed Use Medium Density Residential Community Commercial -Water Bodies L�nd Use Designations I\ ��Eee4� -GatewayCommercial Centers�High DensityResidential -RegionalCommercial �q �SARP - - =5 N L�� \\ \\ � �// � i, :.av aC �� ■�� / � �.II�iG9�1-E\�\ O.� ` i/, I� � ' ' �■�� 7� ■ � �� 1`�.. �. % /%�, s �� Illli _. � \ i ' �:.a \� < i �9 � i ;i �i� �� j;; rt1Th� T'R��,� .:■ � �� r, ; ,��1��._ � . � _.,.:....,.,� �. _.. -'�_ ��. i � rt° �� -;;� ,,. =�:':�� ,` ■ � � y �:��°:€� ' �11��i /'� �,; �2 ��.:��►I ;: W .��: iT.. .� �r" - a� �} �II��_ �� . ]IC7YS] � CS ��___ u �� ..,.t'e�"P��_. �X e . � °-..,'�s�. ��`..�Ule\a7P-.. � {a-`,�C�GGn � `� �+�-� c.�'�44��r� y't�vs �� n� . �� - �.��?-�-�4C-tt1- . \� ��. . �rYf.[� . �k�, ;z?� �s�s��'3 C tY�l�:"+-:d�� "J _ •�� n �3` a77irrrtr. �GGG�r+�T �-` �- _..�� _ . ...��\.... . \: - •. _ .�i�A��qq1�11L�G,� `__....�.'�—r�� -'".: �\ �'.�-a.�1,��\� \\`\��\�� .\.`?`��_s_ ? .\��\�,r �.cU � � m�■ .i�� \ � � �� \ \ � ' �S�i� ��J� -��• �\� ., . . . _ �- ;-� '�.�� '�;� �.. %s�';�� 7S� � �\ � � .:.� , �� ,, c�t�ir»3»��R�� _»_�»� c��R�V 4� m�� /�- �� .��1'� \ �� - � �I . ti `__e`�' �`� ��C�'_'�[ttd�]3�`-��tttZ�]53��`- - '�'-`_ � -- `�»> '��_�� ` �.- j �. �.� �� '��a��m�� :,, Mixed Use High Densiry Residential - Regional Commercial �Water Bodies =�=� � :� y �memem o --- �CwridorMixedUse � Office Lightlndustrial SARP ��;'� \ � \\ 7nu�n ... Low Densiry Residenfial ;;: Neighborhood Commercial - H�vy Indushial EShibiY 3-Pl'OPosed ComPl'ehensiVe Plan N Land Use Designations � Medium DensityResidenfial CanmuniryCommercial Park/Open Space - - - i=s U � q Ja airn wenck F�.�r�scke�'Freaerkk 3 B`Gk . . . � Feirview M10 Eudia ° r�"(".m e�a�a avi�ke� q � ��keve�° 3 a �H Me,� U w �o� �a�w.,o� �g# �rno��eo,�,y wzr .3ia� e �,�^zneaap 'y�� $ LL am�eiw [�x � '"m ce.i..ao�ery ce.mi x�e:ffirn f x LL 3 e x�ry ��0[.m��a} me�.iKU .� � xe�sf�eia �`°�p a W m J __ _ ° a ��E n��me ' sne��o� a �ax iso isa inaiana n�ne i�aa�a ......\� I� eeiew�� emw�� eemw� rvoa m�Sd��a�a�1aioN xo.a _ oeraw�n 50 1e5 " ` x Noa eo�o��oox \\I'. �d v a�e�sm �so`H1eiEZe�oFF o 3o� p a c� usta _ �zs M.,.,�o� m u 9 � �. a�e�sm �e smo�s a�e�sm� m EMe':u..':°ii' ��o� i so Fzm� o.a rn �� ex n��, w - f 5 s,me � ex eu� 8 ,mo a.vrei �e� � s�� s�ma �smro rna��m m o��zs� �`� im��o e s�ox $� eo g s�,n € m eoo�e s�am oe, eovme� � � � e �$Reoo3 _ o��e��' s �e sh�ni o�ma�> 6�aao e�aiao e� £ a �_ � o� �so H oe,me� .vme o _ 3 _ e s o �� " e,�ao € r.sauo� v.�aim� ��ran� �a�� q M,no� `��°��aa mo -W � ' m � £ � J `pag nik� o o°,oe��Kia'£ bn uo�3 m nik,e Y ° = >�s" � sP��b�e , nix� nik �are '��ygeo��oo+ niw o niw sn ee oire - ou.a � on�a " S ��ew � � ' g oin,e �s° m ' � d rvu��vau��„av ue� � veikv.ev�� a kvw v kr = v kv.ay w f w . h x ' ve er.er � rvaa @ rvaa��", y '� >rv� _ -00 me� ° . ° ° Ra� _ �m w _C] � ,p�y� e sd'" Nm M;� �� `o��o a rs�_oRqef 8v��"P°',�co`�"�o'o.��o ffa'°o`�o �ur�- " n j]�`��,7'.y�"�ti� ,J" �'�° �_�'� o� �a �� s � o��q °=°-°--o_o_e�_oaoe-_o-o_��_m� oa��°"�.;"�e L o� N � a ��_�G9�- ��'° G' rJ �so C_��'°r��%.��.�a@,o 0 0❑-,� . ��s�"-Eo_oRO� �r „� LL o atl sa e s�n "�i,��Y �,� _ � �, 5��om d o�oFom o-i tl �.r�ca o❑ -S '��L� � '� €J ❑ o� a�� J`��=5;� p q "� ° =�~m✓o»°� A o o.7'�o J��f�c Yc��e�#' � e'� u ��' � vsa��=tl �90 a�n � m �c_-�aa�b °� °i�'�`�G� o-o��o❑ ❑c��o,o�❑o�»o" � L u sm cro Lr n� c�o 035 ❑�P, , �`o_�r°� n a, �,. - ; ' g �°�A� € �g8paa+ un s�n � _ �a�£ � a "s � _ � p�,,�°° ,m em3 n - LL p� _ �n & ;'m � e� : s-f nn m &nF w _ e _ �"��„`�� snevev<a W �nn � s�n nRnem m� sm mn m ��e @ �n � m� o p : i s� w q�° �o o _ ' %, �om P&9�o �om �om 4 - ° - �n m � �q Fo3 m '� q 'O'n �nn � �un m � �an w�om z a��°--5» �un �un �e �un �un€ � p � � � �sm � � F ��-,��3 �� s � e g �� g _ n�a� m � i� rn = - � an ° � a�am - m m '�am ��m „ � �� E 2 u� am i s�u a s�4�°a m e � _ € a nrc ' -s � n �n = �a� u p`�`rgiar� aJ�a°w �n dT� �ame i LL esn ° a5�n �';eam a5m w��"-, �u 15 eam �n�� a^swi s. . o - � 3 - ��nam.� m �n � m Z , _ �a a�m �ok>� a °3 � n �� n�n @ y 'y � v � �n i �tq " tn S° ;' aetn a m ^ z9tn V m �N ,e�n��d ew,e�n o '� � _ ,a�n ,st� ,e��„,s ,sm � ,e'�� ,19n ��s sa��,��m �a�n Ae m �^s a�'0 ^ � 3 - ��,o �.� o� : zo� ,,. r N�`b� �mm �n��v� 19[��LL � s� ,s��ia � 3e° �m" k�'6,� �m•o ,� °''ia�ne2 nm), z � otict?ea d� ' \)� ��. n"�� nn s u p�� ay � ztna 11 A, - zz�e as�a�F se.,� �e psa� �(`p--'� g' E?t a b�y ��ta� "-�J 6� et�n ]9rtl � 9rtl ��"kary �a.;g vN� �"-�2t.a'm y�d� 2acn F 61 =2iN knqm " u y 10. v - � 6un;,zam �y � � 9 �..�� zsut § s - sn ' "- ° '�am - s�n a Rq P s ' °e eminm� m � � sam E n�n N nen3 s= 3n�n �nn => n� s�� o` o� a°S z �°e �� `c� �. ze�n V - � z '^�Ynv�m �aF . .. o ' n ; ¢ � �;o � o,� 6 pd�n� m� �n ��.Rg ��,� m�i `3as�� "�i _ �' ' �nm� N SARP Boundary Eshibit 1-SARPArea A 7nn�n I� City of Spokane Valley � /V ! �\�� _� �,:._ -'G�� I: � ��a��Po� � � ��d.� e .�,`` %O % Le �e �� i ��\ ' � �� i�.�Jl�■1��\\; �-;.'�'.~•:., �,� � :',. �� i��' \�' ' �� i� �%, �,, : Illh_ ��i ra�\ q�i l: � ,% � _ -r��d�R�d�(1�E�a'3��]lE�l� i . s i;� �i i ��1� 1��,°. �Ir 'T I�� ti � �.� . Gmai �—rr�rr.� � � 1e �e .�;� � , ,� IC I ....� " � IN�I � 1■+ _" i . . .. � r �� .. i �� ' ��I �1, , - . .. .� . � � � , � �� x�i�Ix��il;T� �� 6�� - � �r I�11�� ` . � ; ��: ,' �r . .. � r �a�o c � . �.�� ' - ` %///�o�/��7 i�' c`o_Gf � �o_o- 3_�=�C' .� . nY �a o�,p�p��.��-AoF� ;o=o o_o_��t9�`o=o=4tio--�� c_G�r��,��U�'��o p�� j � .��o o C��=o o C]o o==o o n o 0��:7 ']'fl�o=o�co //' � / �� J ��G�� .w 6�° lii`�I�� ,�„�-: . `� �I�i1�1�� o�=o o��o_o==o o� : .�� i�/,�,,,.,i, � �' � ,-e-c � 2„ ��, -- / Pea :°'-.l�� ' - ' i,- ,.-i �� o ro` o o��o o-o o_�_o=o ❑o�-0.. L '//�` `❑ ��a��i��e ��.'�'G� •` �'� :iW�o��'o�o � a o�o�o" �°`4Va't� ❑b C7'" +7_9_C'�$�'6�t"io � �4-� -o �o_m �-o❑ 0'7 ��_0 '11!■� .�� ° .��'r` : ; _ Wllill � _ ; \,q ,,.o_i.. `�;� �:� : �� ..., . �. R; ;,\ �. :- '�� C NCT -GCC CB R-2�-�,R 4 . MF-2�,,�,;"s O MUC-RC I-2 ;?-°-°�°SARP Etihibit4-ESistittg Zottittg N �a:,..:� ... . � / . . ` �\\ A �CCT MUA GCA R-1 R-3 � MF-1 �GO �CMU NC �I-1 P/OS �-�-cJ ,,■ •!� �\I I� /� i�i�`��Inl��`��'�I� . � .'� G . . _�� \ � \ � �i� �JI� �_�\�� . �\�� .. i I�� /� . . . .. /'' .. �%i� 11�■ ��..� i ii — 7�� \\ _ _ �i I 's: �-''lllli ,� u,�' ..-: .� °� . ' _ � • � �..�-. _... �:, s= � ',:s ■ � ! �� e� i� , ' �I��i �,� �r[�r lr,[�rq��fT11�A1�"�' I� u i r /� ,� :.s ,_ P � "� r� �-�Ir , � � .. . . _ �° ... . �� ' � �.� i�.L.Gf . .' �� , �C � �� / :�. ., _ -. .�:: � �11�� i.. i I��f � � � ,�c_A� ❑c��3.°�a- °�� ..�'E'3 0❑ � [� ' _ _ ��s� �i � �- � � �� \ `� �k r� r�.� p�� . t.- P. � � �! � �'.�� iilfG�Ar4iA-�ii��Y'�`r � � �:��'��,c[y-„2`��. � :.��.. ... � `�� ,. �-�`4C��o CC°.r��'� u��\`'�5�i'� \. � '��t� ��@� : ., ��:�vnnin.nr �..,�. '�, �:��.� . , \ � ..� . ...\\\�` \`\ � _c�❑ \\ ��; e 4 �o� '\�� n�u ,'�� ❑�_o-o=tr_a o r��l�,ii� \ \ �� I�1 �\�\� �\�\e`'�~..'�`za�. �\��\�;\ :��\\\ � ■ �7�$ � �. �\\ ,.� -; `- o❑ ❑ o�] _ ❑ ❑o� at, %� - �, C�� ! \Gr. �� `\ \ \ - 4�-o �o� B o_o_o=a�o 9�i��n ^�So o� I � . .��/�.��.',. 5�' �i�' \�\ � � �;�,s � ouuuludu;�..... .. n . �� .. o C�miaj �� 'o o��[Q'_�k5=o o' cL��7 ��o G '�o❑ o-F' T=o-o �� \ �,� �� i� a. ` ' I� � ~'�� 1 `� �' I�i� � � � ,� �� ° —H �� IG�. : . �� I6�a - . - � liiii4'i�l�+ � � = = = �� - :; __ -- _ _ �,, ,;?Sf R1 R3 MF-1 ��GO\CMU NC - RC - I-2 m��oee W P N sARP E�hibit 5-Pro osed Zoning ^ 9nmog �� R 2 __ _= R-4 � MF-2 �O MUC C \\I-1 CF � /V COMMUN[TY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT P[.n�v�v[�vc D[v[s[o�v S`pokane STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE ��Tr��T PLANNING COMMISSION • u1 2011 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENTS STAFF REPORT DATE:February 15, 2011 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: February 24, 2011, beginning at 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers, Valley Redwood Plaza Building, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 101, Spokane Valley, Washington 99206. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: The 2011 Comprehensive Plan amendments include: CITY INITIATED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENTS File Number Ma or Text Summar of Amendment CPA-04-11 Text Chapter 2 - Land Use: Table 2.1, Spokane Valley UGA Land Capacity Analysis,will reflect new population numbers within the City of Spokane Valley. Map 2.1, Land Use,will display land use designation chan es a roved throu h the 2011 amendment rocess. CPA-05-11 Map 3.2 Chapter 3 -Transportation: Map 3.2, Bike and Pedestrian System, will dis la newl develo ed bike and edestrian infrastructure. CPA-06-11 Text Chapter 4- Capital Facilities and Public Services: Amendments will Map 4.1 incorporate changes in the 6-year Transportation Improvement Plan Map 4.2 (TIP) into the Capital Facilities Plan to ensure consistency. Map 4.5 Amendments will update special purpose district's and other city service provider's facility and service data. Capital projects such as city hall,parks, and public works storage facility will be included for the use of REET funding. Maps 4.1, 4.2,and 4.5 will display updates to reflect the latest capital facilities and public services. Amendments will also update the growth assumptions to reflect population allocation numbers approved by the Spokane County Board of Commissioners. CPA-07-11 Map 7.1 Chapter 7- Economic Development: Map 7.1 will display new buildin ermits and land use actions in the 2010 develo ment c cle. CPA-08-11 Map 8.3 Chapter 8- Natural Environment: Map 8.3 will display the field Map 8.4 inventory work done in conjunction with DNR to update stream t in in S okane Valle . ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code, the lead agency has determined that the proposed text amendments to the comprehensive plan do not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. After a thorough review of the completed environmental checklist, the lead agency has determined that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). PROPOSAL LOCATION: The proposal affects the entire City of Spokane Valley,Washington. APPL�cANT: City of Spokane Valley,WA APPROVAL CRITERIA: Title 17 (General Provisions) and Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). StaffReport and Recommendation to the Planning Commission Page 1 of 5 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Division recommends that the Planning Commission approve the proposed text amendments to the adopted Comprehensive Plan. STAFF PLANNER: Mike Basinger,AICP, Senior Planner, Community Development Department ATTACHMENTS: CPA-04-11: Chapter 2 - Land Use CPA-05-11: Chapter 3 -Transportation CPA-06-11: Chapter 4- Capital Facilities CPA-07-11: Chapter 7- Economic Development CPA-08-11: Chapter 8- Natural Environment I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION APPLICATION PROCESSING: Chapter 17.80 Permit Processing Procedures in the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). The following summarizes key application procedures for the proposal. A lication Submitted: November 1, 2010 Determination of Com leteness: November 1, 2010 Issuance of Determination of Non-Si nificance DNS : Februar 4, 2011 End of Appeal Period for DNS: February 18, 2011 Published Notice of Public Hearin : Februar 4, 2011 Mailed Notice of Public Hearin : Februar 4, 2011 II. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA Findings: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC),the lead agency has determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). The Planning Division issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) for the proposal. This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Conclusion(s): The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act and Title 21 of the SVMC have been fulfilled by the applicant's submittal of the required SEPA Checklist, and the issuance of the City's threshold determination consisting of a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). No appeals were received. III. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS A. COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE 17�GENERAL PROVISIONS� OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE Findings: Section 17.80.140(H) of the SVMC provides approval criteria that must be considered when the City amends the Comprehensive Plan. The criteria are listed below along with staff comments. 1. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; Staff Response: The Washington State Growth Management Act limits the City to amending the Comprehensive Plan to once a year. The City provides a process each year for individuals, groups, StaffReport and Recommendation to the Planning Commission Page 2 of 5 City departments, and elected officials to propose updates to address changing conditions so the plan will reflect ongoing work or new information. The proposed text amendments add or modify policy direction in specific policy areas and update information in the plan. The 2011 proposed text amendments will ensure that internal plans such as the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), special purpose district's and other service provider's plans are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment are furthered by ensuring the Comprehensive Plan is reflective of regional policy and current with other plans. 2. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; Staff Response: The proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are not in conflict with Chapter 36.70A RCW (Growth Management Act) and do not result in internal inconsistencies within the plan itself. 3. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; Staff Response: The proposed text amendments are not site or property specific. This approval criterion does not apply. 4. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; Staff Response: The proposed text amendments will not result in changes to specific properties. 5. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan; Staff Response: The majority of the proposed text amendments either update or correct information contained in the plan. At this point, staff has not identified any deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Section 17.80.140(H) of the SVMC provides the following factors that must be considered when the City amends the Comprehensive Plan. The factors are listed below along with staff comments. 1. The effect of the physical environment; Staff Response: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the City of Spokane Valley Municipal Code, the lead agency has determined that the proposed text amendments do not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. 2. The effect on open space,streams, rivers,and lakes; Staff Response: The proposed text amendments are policy oriented and non-project amendments. 3. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; Staff Response: The proposed text amendments are policy oriented and non-project amendments. 4. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks,recreation,and schools; Staff Response: The City of Spokane Valley addresses adequacy of community facilities on a citywide basis through capital facilities planning. The Comprehensive Plan recommends a concurrency StaffReport and Recommendation to the Planning Commission Page 3 of 5 management system for transportation, sewer, and water facilities. The Parks and Recreation Plan provide an implementation strategy including a capital facilities plan, which identifies costs and revenue sources for new parks. 5. The benefit to the neighborhood, City,and region; Staff Response: The proposed text amendments add or modify policy direction in specific policy areas and update information in the plan to ensure consistency with other internal plans within the City. The public benefit is furthered by ensuring the Comprehensive Plan is reflective of regional policy and current with other internal plans. 6. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land; Staff Response: The proposed text amendments are policy oriented and do not address land quantity or land use designations. 7. The current and projected population density in the area; and Staff Response: The proposed text amendments are policy oriented and non-project amendments. The proposed amendments do not demand population analysis; however, population projections and capacity numbers were updated through this amendment process. 8. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. Staff Anal,� The proposed amendments are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will have minimal impact on other aspects of the plan. Conclusion(s): The proposed Comprehensive Plan text amendments are consistent with the approval criteria and factors contained in the SVMC. B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO PUBLIC COMMENTS Findings: Staff has received no public comments to date. Conclusion(s): No concerns are noted. C. FINDWGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO AGENCY COMMENTS Findings: The Department of Commerce (DOC) sent confirmation that materials were received on February 4, 2011 and processed with the Material ID IVo. 16608. The City is required under RCW.70A.106 to send comprehensive plan amendments to DOC for review 60-days prior to adoption. Conclusion(s): No concerns are noted. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Planning Division after review and consideration of the proposed amendments and applicable approval criteria and factors recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of CPA-04-11 through CPA-08-11. StaffReport and Recommendation to the Planning Commission Page 4 of 5 V. PLANNING COMMISSION FINDINGS The Planning Commission is required to adopt findings of fact(Sections 17.80.140) when recommending changes to the Comprehensive Plan. At the conclusion of the hearing for the Comprehensive Plan amendments, the Planning Commission,by separate motion, should adopt findings of fact. Findings: Staff has prepared the following findings for the Planning Commission in the event there is concurrence with the recommended approval. Section 17.80.140 (H) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) provides approval criteria that must be considered when the City amends the Comprehensive Plan. Planning Commission Findings and Factors(Section 17.180.140H of the SVMC� Findinas a. The public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment is furthered by ensuring the Comprehensive Plan is reflective of regional policy and current with other internal plans. b. The proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are consistent with Chapter 36.70A RCW (Growth ManagementAct). c. The proposed text amendments are not site or property specific and do not respond to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies. This approval criterion does not apply. d. The proposed text amendments are not site or property specific and do not correct mapping errors. This approval criterion does not apply. e. The proposed amendment does not address an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. The majority of the proposed text amendments either update or correct information contained in the plan. At this point,staff has not identified any deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Factors: a. Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the City of Spokane Valley Municipal Code, the lead agency has determined that the proposed text amendments do not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. b. The proposed text amendments are policy oriented non-project amendments and will not affect open space,streams, rivers, and lakes. c. The proposed text amendments are policy oriented non-project amendments and will not impact adjacent land uses orsurrounding neighborhoods d. The adeauacy of community facilities is determined on a citywide basis through capital facilities planning. e. The proposed text amendments are policy oriented and do not address land auantity or land use designations. f. The proposed text amendments are policy oriented and non-project amendments. The proposed amendments do not demand population analysis. g. The proposed amendments are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will have minimal impact on other aspects of the plan. Recommended Motion: The Planning Commission finds the 2011 Comprehensive Plan text amendments to be consistent with Section 17.80.140 (H) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). The Planning Commission adopts the findings in the staff report and recommends approval of CPA-04-11 through CPA-OS-11, amendments to the comprehensive plan text. StaffReport and Recommendation to the Planning Commission Page 5 of 5 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan quality of water runoff. Furthermore, development of a wellhead protection program with the various water providers should provide guidelines to avoid possible contamination. Policies contained in the Natural Environment chapter provide direction for development near wellheads and in aquifer recharge areas. For a complete discussion of water resources and water purveyors in the City of Spokane Valley, refer to the Capital Facilities chapter. 2.3.3 Parks and Open Space One of the most important and valued elements of a high quality living and working environment is a parks and open space system. Providing parks and open spaces contributes to a reduction in environmental impacts such as noise and air pollution; increases the value of adjacent properties; provides areas for passive and active recreation; and helps preserve the natural beauty of the City. 2.3.4 Natural Environment Spokane Valley's natural beauty is apparent. Streams, wetlands, surrounding mountains and the Spokane River provide a scenic backdrop as well as a source for active and passive recreation for the citizens of Spokane Valley. The Land Use chapter seeks to protect Spokane Valley's unique natural resources through policies that support the preservation of these areas for future generations. The Natural Environment chapter also includes a discussion of critical areas as defined by GMA. For a complete discussion, please refer to the Natural Environment chapter. 2.3.5 Housing Housing is a basic human need and a major factor in the quality of life for individuals and families. An adequate supply of affordable, attractive, and functional housing is fundamental to achieving a sense of community. The central issue related to land use is supplying enough land to accommodate projected growth for a range of incomes and households. Presently, housing is provided primarily in single-family subdivisions. This plan sets forth strategies to increase housing options and choices. The Land Use chapter advocates changes to current development codes to increase flexibility in platting land and encourage housing as part of mixed-use developments in commercial areas. The latter provides an opportunity to locate housing closer to employment and shopping, and to create affordable housing. A complete discussion of housing can be found in the Housing chapter. 2.4 Potential Annexation Areas 2.4.1 Projected Growth In October 2003, the City of Spokane Valley received a 2000 population certification from the U.S. Census Bureau that indicated 80,927 people called Spokane Valley home on April 1, 2000. As of April 1, 2003 the population had grown to 82,005 (based on the Washington State Office of Financial Management (OFM) population estimates). Upon incorporation on March 31, 2003, the City of Spokane Valley became the state's ninth largest city and second largest in Spokane County. �p^��'^,�V��,:�Fe6eHled nGnn ��i�+�.,., o��TM.�f81-��29nn „f n�z asn. T�-i�s�ew ��- +��n�z n„n„��+;,,., o?�TM+�The most recent OFM estimate for Spokane Valley is �9�90,210 as of April 1, �9�8�2010. This#i��population increase represents an annual growth rate of approximately�-51_0 percent since 2009. The average annual growth rate is approximately '.�1.37% over the_�7 year period from 2003 to �89-�2010. Future population growth is forecasted at the state and county level by OFM. This future population growth was distributed between jurisdictions and unincorporated Spokane County through a methodology prepared by the Spokane County Steering Committee of Elected Officials (SCEO). T"^ ��+„ r,f C.,r,Lo.,o ��uo„ ,., �.�hi.�h i.,.�l��.Joo +ho ., .�i+ioo r,f C.,r,Lo.,o \/ollo�� o.,.J I iho.+�� I oLo Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 9 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan . �e 0 0 "�� Using +;�,��an averaqe annual growth rate of 1.37%, `"'hi.�h ; ;�+o.,+ ,.,,+h n��+ o�+;n,�+o,� ,.r,,,.,+h r�+o� ;., +ho en„��.,o ��o„ � , the estimated ��2031 population of Spokane Valley is ��P120,145 or an increase of��29,935 persons. T"° ' so� � �� .,+h r�+o r „�+� ; �n�s n ��i�+�,,., .,f �n� n�� r,f S7 (1R� �e ��e��RCW 36.70A requires that at least every ten years the incorporated and unincorporated portions of the desiqnated urban qrowth areas and the densities permitted therein, be reviewed and revised so as to ensure that the urban qrowth areas are sufficient to accommodate the urban qrowth that is proiected bv OFM to occur in the countv for the succeedinq 20 vear ep riod. �ii„��+�.,., �., ni„"on,hor�nnn 0 #�^,re6�� „f �z�Fersens. T�i��-I.,f„rY„�+,,,., , ,��se��ed +„ +ho crGn ,,., �eb�y=T�29� '^�POn June 9, 2009, the BoCC approved via Resolution �-84��09-0531 a population allocation of��18,746 for Spokane Valley for planning purposes. 2.4.2 Land Capacity Analysis The GMA does not require a Population and Land Capacity Element to be included in the comprehensive plan. However, GMA does require that Land Use, Housing and Capital Facilities Elements include population densities, building intensities and estimates of future population growth. The GMA also requires a Land Capacity Analysis, or the theoretical holding capacity of the designated Urban Growth Areas, which by definition includes cities. By assigning the expected population growth to the results of the Land Capacity Analysis, the area required to accommodate the population growth is shaped. Countywide population forecasts are identified by the CWPPs, as one criterion for consideration in developing a regional methodology or countywide population allocation. The countywide growth target is based on the OFM growth management population forecast for Spokane County. The Land Quantity Analysis Methodology for Spokane County was developed through the efforts of the Land Quantity Technical Committee between March 1995 and October 1995. The Growth Management Steering Committee of Elected Officials adopted that methodology on November 3, 1995. The adopted methodology is patterned after the Washington State Department of Community, Trade and Economic DevelopmenYs (CTED) land quantity inventory guidebook entitled Issues in Designating Urban Growth Areas Part I- Providing Adequate Urban Area Land Supply. Use of that document was specified by the adopted Countywide Planning Policies (Policy Topic 1 (Urban Growth Areas Policy#3). However, the step-by-step CTED process was modified somewhat by the Land Quantity Technical Committee to reflect unique circumstances in Spokane County. The following steps of the regional methodology were followed by Spokane Valley in conducting the land capacity analysis: Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 10 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 1. Identify lands that are potential candidates to accommodate future growth - vacant, partially-used and under-utilized land (in other words, subtract all parcels committed to other uses). 2. Subtract all parcels that the community defines as not developable because of physical limitation. 3. Subtract lands that will be needed for other public purposes. 4. Subtract all parcels that the community determines are not suitable for development for social and economic reasons. 5. Subtract that percentage of land that the community assumes will not be available for development within the community plan's 20-year time frame. 6. Build in a safety factor. 7. Determine total capacity. Spokane Valley prepared a land capacity analysis of the city and surrounding UGAs based on the above regional methodology. The results of the land capacity analysis are contained in the table below: I Table 2.1 Spokane Valley UGA Land Capacity Analysis (updated�Aa�B�October 2010) Vacant and Net Developable Potential New Population Area Partially Used qcres Dwelling Units Capacity Land I Spokane Valley �816 4 (Incorporated Area) ��3,314 ��1,370 ��7,412 93 Ini,..+��e��• 4-� �33 � � � N ert�twee� � � �� 4-�� I €a�� a-9� 4� �� I Se�Fiea� 4-�� 3g � 7�R1 � �I� �64 � �9 �� I Re�e�e�sa �55 �5 � � IC.dr.enl:ff/Il:chrr.�r. �a �� C�'Z � I �� Spokane Valley recommended to the Steering Committee that both the City of Spokane Valley and the City of Liberty Lake receive an interim population allocation that could be accommodated within the existing city limits of each city. The rationale for this recommendation was based on the situation regarding sanitary sewer throughout the entire Spokane region. It is estimated that the Spokane County treatment plant will run out of capacity in 2009, and the Liberty Lake Water & Sewer District treatment capability is currently at or near capacity. Permits to expand the Spokane County and Liberty Lake plants from the Washington State Department of Ecology and the Environmental Protection Agency are currently in doubt. Given the potential constraint for both jurisdictions to provide this vital urban service, the Steering Committee forwarded a recommendation to the Spokane County Board of County Commissioners to allocate only the population that could be accommodated within existing city limits until such time as the sanitary sewer issues are resolved. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 11 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 2.4.3 Potential Annexation Areas The purpose of this section is to identify the unincorporated areas within the existing Spokane County UGA that are adjacent to the City of Spokane Valley, which would comprise potential annexation areas for the City. Map 2.2 indicates potential annexation areas (PAAs) for the City of Spokane Valley. Spokane County adopted its first comprehensive plan developed under GMA in 2001. A complete examination of urban services was required at the time the County established the UGA, moreover, Spokane County was obligated to comply with the State Environmental Policy Act. The County's plan included the designation of a regional UGA, which included the still unincorporated area of Spokane Valley. The County utilized the SEPA/GMA integration process to fulfill the environmental review requirements of the plan including the designated UGA. When Liberty Lake incorporated in 2001 and Spokane Valley incorporated in 2003 much of the "Valley UGA" was included as part of the newly created cities, but not all. In 2003 and again in 2006, Liberty Lake completed annexations totaling 975.69 acres of the County designated UGA. These annexations resulted in a nearly 34 percent increase (from 4.5 square miles to just over 6 square miles) in land area for Liberty Lake. ISeveral ^f +o��UGAs are a�-�j�contiguous to Spokane Valley Tss��+h �,,,,+ho��+ �n,� n„�+ho��+� and would be logical areas for future annexation to the City of Spokane Valley. Spokane County and the metro cities of Spokane Valley, Spokane, Liberty Lake and Airway Heights have begun the process of updating the regional UGA consistent with the county wide planning policies (CWPPs). Through this process, the City of Spokane Valley will identify areas needed to accommodate allocated population growth by re-evaluating land quantity analysis and urban service delivery. 2.4.4 Development of Goals, Policies, and Actions for Annexation The Growth Management Act (GMA) requires counties to designate Urban Growth Area (UGAs) within which urban growth shall be encouraged RCW 36.70A.110 (1). UGAs are to include sufficient land to accommodate the twenty-year population growth projected for the county. The GMA imposes planning requirements to influence the ability of a city to annex UGAs. A city is required by GMA to adopt policies for land use, housing, capital facilities, utilities, and transportation within the city's UGA. In order to meet this requirement the City of Spokane Valley has developed policies and goals to provide policy guidance for annexation of territory within UGAs. Annexation will have financial impacts on the city; it may be positive or negative. The City may need to develop an annexation study to assess the financial impacts especially for larger annexations. The Capital Facilities chapter identifies current service providers within the Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs) as a starting point for the detailed analysis that may be needed � , prior to annexation. � .`,� � , . � ��, ,;,, 2.5 Land Use Desiqnations i r -� �"J � � ��_ . '�'.- _ �� .' . � .; , � The land use designations in the SVCP - recognize the relationships between � , broad patterns of land uses. The �r �' � `�f�= designations set forth locational criteria _ ,� 'y�- ,`� ��,,�;�'r �`;- for each specific class of uses consistent �'�` Y _ �'�; ��, •:, ��. �'-" �`�"`�� with the long-term objectives of the �'` �' �*" � SVCP. These designations provide the purpose and intent for specific zoning districts. The location of the comprehensive plan land use designations are shown on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map (Map 2.1). Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 12 of 36 � Map 3.2 "�� Bike and Pedestrian $ ' _ � A 8=� � System � <�°° �p�e„�e�,Fe,,,-w � ° - - � ° � c. . . �_�� i � Ci[v of � � �� '� — Spokane `e � �P �{�y� m�a Legend � 's e 51'Id'Pa�'S � �' m � 3�- JC nsei �y�.�\, I • • •• (�[L�ne1�ol�a Rocks) O 1 �c �'O3 � ,� a� B��VC1e and Pedest[�an 6vs[em P��`� �� • \y � �� SheredUSePe[h � �S� � -��` ` «a� ��i� g A'oposedSLaredUSePeth s �.anea��e. �g T�vn'of Dlill�rood� �� - a �� \I e `\ �� BikeLene a a -' - - e,�-ti �� . � � �, °- , a . . � �A� � > . + . 3„� T m m ,�,�,- � , .i � . I rr�'"�� 9,4`i v �°.. AopwedB�ke Lene ° e� � ,e� __ w-unM'� � . ^ "�g s �Po �`��V . � �p ti I `d��W~ �g B�keL A p sedShazedUSePeth W e �. : y.. . � x \'aLL \I l� �� p 6 ° p � „ 9 ' S�n edSharedROed«'ay Ci[p of �auei 5 Cev G�eeu � s w a Sin edSheredROedvcay/ProposedBike Liber[y P k�ROaa G� o�o p - ��1 r I'a�'e 9hazedROad�vey . r oi �e� a "s� . -� e�,a., � � ` -- �PedeshianPath N S u _ , �u,w°� . 3 � . a � ° - aJm s �. �� _ . � � s � m a � • � W^ a r*+r� 8 orv�a AoposedP A��y y @ a .� = B It o�e Oppo�to -TO�mship , edes[nanPeth �� M 3 Park�-. �o � Hiu � n "'°;o -�'" �� . c . .,,,�," s,� � irailheads e /�w:s', hn+�.+�.f:ti� 9'+°`av � ��«v s,� � � 3� , -.$p�. r �� . �� ,a � � �� ,.� � I ters[ete 90 u • a�n � N 3� �°'" si�� q� $ � 9choole , m b �� Cnmp � � s� ° �i�- �� .. n Ca�o ' n y` I . �'� °6'ha Reilroed -1 - _ 1Ea utty t� �I��b: w..„_,� e°�� ' Dki�mau Huls }� w .�, � O[herM ''p 1't'es 'h e �A 4�:�Sb �'�� g` �3 � � - � CiROfSpokaneVelley $ Te�'�'ace\'ien Pa�'k � liiUan Gio�c9�Area Pool z ° - � Pazks �- 'F_� � - '� y e,_' 0.'atei Bodies � � ' � "a� � � �� s��o..,� � . earks NI= � MapLocahon v Ce'sue � ��jx Pi�'k �� - �� c�9mT�, g r �' a�� 3a�_ � � E�xe�n.-enare:xnxnnx �� g L o 1 ntl A � �3 � � � Ord No.:Y\-kYY� d� _ � �, _ �g �� ° ^$ �' _ �� U � �� " j a �� _ ,a` ` � ° F�� & � 0 OS 1 2 Miles �e ILLe�'COOSe�1a�i � '0�`� He�t � � g lice�Zkeinfo.m nshmi nxhismoyi piisdF�mw ` � rcce oras m,revinorc.Zhec eh m¢keri o claim � e� e \Iar�n��Caose g� � c l�ofhis and $ � o �m � a� l eW�Q(�d. !. !._1 7 - nte � o� �':,� 8 �m zo ro h �. c��fs .m a r��c mm�. �a�aionman��ev��a,a�v��o,ofzran.�a .o_�...-:000mn City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 4.4.2 Growth Assumption On June 9, 2009, the Spokane County Board of Commissioners (BoCC) approved a population allocation of 18,746 people for the City of Spokane Valley. The allocation is the amount of people the City can accommodate within its current municipal boundary. In addition, the BoCC approved a population allocation of 8,138 people for the unincorporated Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) adjacent to the City of Spokane Valley. The City of Spokane Valley has identified the adjacent UGAs as Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs). The City has identified existing service providers to help determine the effects on existing levels of service in the event of annexation. Capital facilities planning activities within these UGAs continue to be the County's responsibility. The following population data is used for capital facilities planning purposes: IT�hiu A A D..r...1�4:....Dr..iun4:..r. I �f �a ?i-8-a-rd �a I � �� 4 �(1G 77f1 ITable 4.4 Population Proiection IYear 2011 2017 2031 IPopulation 91,836 96,307 107,604 4.4.3 Level of Service Cities are often defined by the quality of facilities and services that are provided to its residents. Good road, sewer and water infrastructure are typical criteria used by businesses considering relocation. Park and recreation facilities are increasingly used to judge the quality of a City. Businesses want to locate where they can attract the best employees, and quality of life issues are often the deciding factor for a person to move to a new area. Level of service standards are quantifiable measures, such as acres of parks per 1000 people, or the amount of time it takes to travel a road segment during peak morning and afternoon "rush hours," the higher the level of service the higher the cost. This element establishes levels of service which will be used to evaluate the adequacy and future cost of urban facilities and services. 4.4.3 Concurrency The Growth Management Act introduces the concept of concurrency, which requires new development to be served with adequate urban services at the time of development, or within a specified time thereafter. The GMA allows six years for necessary transportation improvements to be constructed as long as a financial commitment is made at the time of development. The GMA strongly encourages concurrency for water and sewer, and it is good public policy to require the same. 4.4.4 Financing Facilities and Services The City is limited in its ability to finance all desired capital facility projects. Options must be available for addressing funding shortfalls or decisions must be made to lower levels of service for public facilities. In deciding how to address a particular shortfall, the City will need to balance current needs versus future growth requirements; existing deficiencies versus future expansions. Capital facilities plans must be balanced. When funding shortfalls occur, the following options should be considered: a. Increase revenues, b. decrease level of service standards, Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 12 of 71 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Capital Projects and Financing Plan Spokane Valley anticipates either constructing a new City Hall building, or purchasing and remodeling an existing building within the six year time frame of this CFP. The following table shows that Spokane Valley will use approximately $1,000,000 of Real Estate Excise Tax revenue for Civic Buildings. IT�hlu A G!`..rr.rr.��nifii C�nili4iuc Cin�r.nir.r.D��n � P-Fejes� a �8&Z �88� 298� �0-�4 �1- 20-a-� �et2� 8 � Ir�„�.. r�..�r+�e� `d6� a59 �a`9 a;389 �� e�a� 9 9 8 � �559 �59 a;399 �� I ce e c„ IDe�l Cc+�+e Cvnice T�v .�. '�Ca '�Ca �� Il�enerol CiinrJ � �� Qa � �a ,�� I �� a a a r-�- 2�3� � �a �� I ITable 4.6 Communitv Facilities Financinq Plan IProiect 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total ICivic Facilities 100 100 400 400 400 400 1800 I Public Works 500 Maintenance Facilitv ITotal 600 100 400 400 400 400 2300 IRevenue Source IReal Estate Excise Tax 100 100 100 200 100 200 800 IGeneral Fund 0 0 300 200 300 200 1000 IStreet Fund � 250 250 IStormwater Fund 250 250 ITotal 600 100 400 400 400 400 2300 4.4.8 Domestic Water The City of Spokane Valley does not own or operate a public water supply system. Rather, water is provided to Spokane Valley residences and businesses by special purpose districts, associations, and public and private corporations. Water service is coordinated by Spokane County through the Coordinated Water System Plan (CWSP), which identifies service boundaries, establishes minimum design standards and promotes the consolidation of regional water resource management. The CWSP is updated as needed at the direction of the Board of County Commissioners or the Washington State Department of Health (DOH). Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 16 of 71 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan IEast Spokane Water Dist 1 1700 94 1,277,000 IHutchinson Irriqation Dist#16 790 0 1,200,000 IHoneywell Electronic Mfq LLC 0 1 0 IIrvin Water District#6 1597 154 1,900,000 IKaiser Alum-Trentwood Works 0 2 21,200 IModel Irriqation Dist#18 2518 6 550,000 IModern Electric Water Co 7424 824 1,500,000 IOrchard Avenue Irriqation Dist 6 1255 4 0 IPinecroft Mobile Home Park 143 0 — 400 IPuerta Vallarta 0 1 0 ISpitfire Pub And Eaterv 0 2 87 ISpokane Business&Industrial Park 0 252 478,000 ISpokane Co-Mirabeau Park 0 2 200 ISpokane Co Water Dist#3 9788 426 6,880,000 ITrentwood Irriqation District 3 1727 162 1,120,000 IVera Water&Power 9259 390 8,650,000 IWoodland Park Trailer Court 30 0 0 I *Approximatelv 620 connections within Citv of Spokane Vallev Source: Washinpton State Deoartment of Health I Table 4.8 Group B Systems Group B System Connections Holiday Trailer Court 12 Janzen&Janzen 1 Levernier Const.Water System 1 Mercer Trucking Co Inc 1 Middco Tool&Equipment 1 Systems Transport Inc 1 Tci Water System 6 Tds 2 Union Pacific Railroad-Trentwood 1 Westco S Apparel Service 3 Western Structures Inc 2 WSDT-Pines Road Maintenance 1 Source: Washington State Department of Health Level of Service The Countywide Planning Policies were amended in 2004 to defer level of service standards for water supply and fire flow to the requirements of the Department of Health and local fire codes respectively. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 20 of 71 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Forecast of Future Needs Spokane Valley adopts by reference water system plans for all water purveyors providing service within the City of Spokane Valley. Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities Spokane Valley adopts by reference water system plans for all water purveyors providing service within the City of Spokane Valley. Capital Projects and Financing Plan Spokane Valley adopts by reference capital project and financing plans for all water purveyors providing service within the City of Spokane Valley. Fire Protection and Emergency Medical Service Fire protection and emergency medical services (EMS) are provided by Spokane Valley Fire � Department (�;s�r+c� "—��'�SVFD) and Spokane County Fire District No. 8. �p^��Fa'„� _ �i�eSVFD serves over 90% of the Valley, while District 8 serves a few small areas in the southern part of the City (see Fire Districts Map at the end of � -� � this chapter). Both districts serve the City with a full � r' ��'� ��'� '� `;�L ��' range of fire suppression and EMS services. - -__.-_. �- _ �_ � I Spokane Valley voters chose to annex �e -- � _ `�°'�,�„��+rzinto SVFD and District No. 8 in September, 2004. Insurance Rating � Si#��Fire departments °^�' f;ro ^r^+o„+;�n ,�;�+r;,.+� are assigned a numerical fire protection rating by the Washington Surveying and Ratings Bureau. Insurance companies fund the Bureau to perform on-site inspections of fire districts to determine the rating. The Bureau analyzes five main areas: average response time, water supply, communication network, schedule of fire inspections and fire station evaluations (which focus on age of vehicles), personnel training and staffing of facilities. Insurance companies use the fire protection rating to help determine insurance rates on all fire insurance policies. The rating is on a scale of one to ten, with one representing the best score. Quality of fire service can have a significant impact on fire insurance rates, particularly for commercial businesses. ,°s—of��8n� c^^'-°^° �a'��8��°�e��SVFD has a Fire Insurance Rating of#e�+�three 3 and District No. 8 has a Rating of five�, both indicating �es� excellent fire protection services. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 21 of 71 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Inventory of Existing Facilities and Apparatus I The Fire Districts Map shows the location of fire stations and service area boundaries for�e `�°'��SVFD, District No. 8 and surrounding fire protection districts. All fire agencies have mutual aid agreements to assist each other in major emergencies. I �„��y��o„ �,ro �nnaSVFD 2011 apparatus inventory includes �i+-��10 ��°Type I e�i+-�esEnqines, �3 Tvpe II Enqines, 3 Class A pumper/ladders, +�^�^ m°�'�^„°"�^'°°, three brush trucks and other miscellaneous vehicles for staff, training, rescue, maintenance, prevention and � command. �^'-°^° `�°"°„ ��r°SVFD has ten stations, including ei�#�seven within the City of Spokane Valley. Locations of the stations are as follows: IT�hlu A O Cr.i.4�r.0\/�Ile.i C:ru IIl:c4r:n4 C4�4:�n I � �4:�r�c IC+�+inn 1* 1l1110 C�c+Cnroni�e IC+n+inn 7* R(1(17 C��c+Trcn+ I �� 771R Alnrlh LJ�ni�rrl Ic+�+�,..,n � ��nna c��+�ni°ue�ie„ I � �tt�n��+nn�.�e++� � �� IC+�+inn 7* 1171 Cnii4h C�iernreen IGd` '+�+�nn�* Alnr4h 711/1\A/ilhiir I �` '+�+�nn� C�c} 1�Rt1� 1R� ` IC+�+inn 1!1** C�c+ 17717 Cr.r�niie IIncirJe CnnL�ne\/�Ile�r!"i+�r I imi+c I *�AarJin nnl�i c+�+inn I � Table 4.9 Spokane Vallev Fire � Department Station Locations � Station 1" 10319 East Spraque � Station 2 9111 E Frederick � Station 3 � 2218 North Harvard � Station 4 22406 East Welleslev � Station 5' 15510 East Marietta � Station 6' i 6306 East Spraque � Station 7' 1121 South Everqreen � Station 8' North 2110 Wilbur � Station 9' East 12121 32"a � Greenacres Station' East 17217 Spraque � ' Inside Spokane Vallev Citv Limits Fire District No. 8 has one fire station inside the City limits, station 84 in the Ponderosa neighborhood, located at 4410 South Bates. The District has two stations located outside the City limits providing additional coverage, No. 81 at 6117 South Palouse Highway and No. 85 at 3324 South Linke Road. Stations 81 and 84 each have two Class A engines and two wildland brush engines. Station 85 has one Class A engine and one wildland brush engine. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 22 of 71 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Level of Service �^��a'��The Level of Service goals for response time are °°�,Tdescribed in SFVD's Standard of Cover. SVFD's Standard of Cover is consistent with the reqionally adopted minimum level of service for fire protection and emerqencv services. • �:^��s �9°�-^�,�e-�;�;�e-#^r��,;:s • �:^^�Y,-,�'^'�'�zS �9°��2�;�;�E#��816 �',::.�pp^�aL�� st•nn • +og ggoi f+h�' �„r o,�"�.,,.� i •f,� c��nn,,.+ io�� .owrrrtrm'�r'a'cc �o—c,—c,-r ;-rrr vrncrrarrv �;,�,�u�vrc�rc 7 �� orl��onnorJ r. norJ��roc 4n r. nrJ m r�o4ion4�c o ' ��oror.o r o+ir,�,00 fl,r firo .�ollo +ho .,00+ �1 � o fl,lll,�.�o• • �80�-`�I�h^'„�'+�� S26S,�,aS • �S^Q��r�;;,��2-7 �es^^��'s • �s^��rx�;;,��'��$ ses^^��'s • �8^��r�;;,��es�s ssl�es+,,,., ,.,;�� ,�;";,�o ,.��--be�ee� f,ro o� c �.,,� R� c . �^��V�;T°„�AS--I'z�3c�,Qed +�^-'�"-'a�eF�� na ,.�ii� n r f.�Y„ �nnn +„ �nn� The following table shows the number of calls per year. IT�hle A �(1 Ilic4r:n4 1 C:ru Ducr...r.cuc I �K �� I � � �� ITable 4.10 Spokane Vallev Fire Department Citv Responses IYear 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 ICitv Responses 8270 9144 10080 9480 9394 The Countywide Planning Policies for Spokane County establishes minimum levels of service for fire and emergency medical services as follows: Urban areas are required to be serviced by a Fire District with at least a Class Six Insurance rating. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 23 of 71 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan • Urban areas must be within five road miles of an operating fire station that provides service with a "Class A" pumper, unless structures are equipped with fire sprinklers. • Urban areas shall be served by a state certified basic life support (BLS) agency within five miles and an operating advanced life support unit within six miles or ten minutes response time. IBoth ��r°��SVFD and 8 meet the minimum countywide level of service standards. Forecast of Future Needs I'lic4rir+ ic r�l�nr�ir�rv 4m m��io C4�4inn I�In Q 4n 4ho�iirini4�i nf'2'�� 4�io �r�rl Dir�oc Rrl The northeast area of the City is underdeveloped at present but as the City grows over the next ten I to fifteen years, +;�,��SVFD recognizes that a new station will need to be constructed to provide an adequate level of service. T"° °�nStation 11 will be constructed �^ +"° ��^�^�+�� ^fat Barker and Euclid. Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities C+o+ir,Y, Nr, Q �.��II ho .,�, �orJ fr.,.r, i+o oY,+ Ir,.�o+4r,., o+ 9�5��1 Coo+ 9R� +r, +ho � .,i+�� l,f Q'�� Fes��r'�^+ c+�+,,,., n�„ �n ;n+„ � +hree��f�,.;�,+„ ,.,;+h ,�„r,,,��ep��-�g,:,n�. Statlon No. 11 wlll be located in the vicinity of Barker and Euclid and will a�-se-I�ehave �aa3 bays with �'^rm° f^r °;^"+ �e�se�e4fire apparatus. Construction for Station 11 is tentatively planned for '^��2016 or when qrowth in the area will support the investment and onqoinq costs. Capital Projects and Financing Plan I �„��no ��o„ �,ro non�.+Y„on+SVFD is a junior taxing °��+��district and supplements its regular taxes with special levies. As the restrictions on the taxes generated from the regular tax go down, special levies are proposed to maintain needed funding. Special levies must be approved by � ��r°��voters served bv SVFD. The Department does not use its bonding capacity to fund capital projects. The DepartmenYs philosophy is to reserve funds generated through its regular � revenues for future capital needs. The following table represents t�x,1�,ri��SVFD planned capital expenditures. IT�hlu A �� Cr...4�nu\/�I�u.i Ciru G. r!`�r.:4�I Dri.iun4c �r.rl C:r.�nn:n.r Dl�n I �� + Cire C+�+inn�In O � � ��+� � r�.e c+�+�,..,ni,. �n $�$99 $�88 f�� 6t2� �� $�� n�„+ez�Rese�Ve-�u;as-#1',.��.eg�a,��,r,�;�,.++�c.,e�,y,��f,,,,,� ,. ,,;+��;.., ,,,,eRaeFl#� �nr,,,��.,+�� e+�..,e� Q� nnm I ITable 4.11 SVFD Capital Proiects Plan Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 24 of 71 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan IProiect 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Administration Buildinq 3 400 � 3 400 (New construction) Fire Station No.6 1 600 1 600 (Reconstruction) Fire Station No. 11 $1,800 $1,800 (New construction) ITotal 6 800 I (Amounts are times$1,000) 4.4.9 Library Service Library services are provided by the Spokane County Library District, which serves the unincorporated countv and eleven of its thirteen cities and towns. The District has a long history of excellent service and upon incorporation, the City of Spokane Valley ��°^��+°�' ° contracted with the District for continued service for its residents. ,°,�er +�-�;�ear,�ti G�,.h+„ � on+ „f,,,,+or� � ,o,� � n h�,.� �n+„ +ho n��+r�,.+ �n In a May 2005 special election, eiqhtv-seven percent of voters approved annexinq back into the District, with the annexation effective January 1, 2006. C�.�ili+�� Dl�.,..i.,r. hor.o., o.,.J o .,�f.�o.,+ o �.,+ r,f�.,fr,rrr,o+�r,., �. ..o+horo.J .,.�I��.J�.,..• � !'`r,r,�,.,orior,.,o �.�i+h lihror�� fo.�ili+ioo i l,+hor oi.,�,ilor oi�o.J \A/oohi.,..+r,., .�i+ioo � C.,I,Lo.,o\/ollo�� .Jorr,r,..ro.,h�.�o � D��hli.� lihror��fo.�ili+�� o+o.,.Jor.Jo � �., o ol��oio l,f.��rro.,+ C.,I,Lo.,o\/ollo�� o o lihrorioo � Drl,o o.,.J .� r,f��orir,��o fo.�ili+�� ol+or.,o+i��oo o.,.J � !'`l,w,r,�,��.,'+�� r r.�h 0 I'hro ',rtar rcmc'°c..r. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 25 of 71 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan �e�e�...ti r,,.,..i��,,.,� 0 r,,.,,.,,��.,�+.,e��.-.,e., �.,��'^-«V�i�� r„�,,.,,��.,�+„ �rE#GF�R^°�� F�}('�:cic�r2��'-�n'a'°cofi.,.,zT`�T'�9au9c° �"vrVc'an��ii°c`p' �I ri+i�on'c o+icfon+ir�n �nii+h n on+ I ihrorv c Tho r,�, l,r�+�� r,f o r,.,.Jo.,+o � �o.J I�hror� �"!L�., se��s i� a�os+�i4�4igr�vv+t��3°�e# ��' � F2�o,�,a2Ri�v�2�r,.+�.,.. +ho+ rhror�� { rvr,.,.J � .,r,.J ., ollor,+ � � i _. .. r� � �� Inventory of Existing Facilities � �� _ � Spokane Valley has one library located inside its boundary, the DistricYs Valley Branch, located at 12004 East Main. This resource library is the � DistricYs largest facility, measuring 22,�88-950 square feet, including branch administrative space. The District has two other libraries within the greater Valley area located at 4322 North Argonne and 22324 East Wellesley in Otis Orchards. � As of May �9�842010, approximatelv �-,�4433,000 Spokane Valley residents were Library District cardholders. Valley Library was the primary branch of VALLEY registration, with Argonne second and Otis Orchards third. Spokane County Library District has a �� reciprocal �;��borrowinq agreement with the E Brnadway Av City of Spokane with over 1,500 Spokane Valley � �,d��e;�s�:,� residents evw�i+�havinq a Spokane �i�Public Es " "°°' � = � � � ��Library card. � ; A � a � a Librarv Facilitv Master Plan = � �� E,��,aY �� In March 2008 voters defeated a proposal to establish a proposed Greater Spokane Vallev Librarv Capital Facilitv area to issue General Obliqation Bonds for construction of a new main librarv and a new neiqhborhood branch in the eastern area of the Citv. The District subsequentiv undertook a capital facilities planninq process for its entire service area, resultinq in the Julv 2010 Board of Trustees approval of a 20-vear Librarv Facilities Master Plan (LFMP). Usinq 2031 population estimates based on Spokane Countv GMA population allocations, the LFMP addresses current and future facilitv needs in each of its five qeoqraphic service areas: the Greater Spokane Vallev, North Countv, Southeast Countv, Southwest Countv, and Moran/Glenrose Prairie. LFMP development included communitv research (customer and communitv telephone survevs, focus qroups, and communitv leader interviews); population qrowth estimatinq bv aeoqraphic area; evaluations of existinq facilities and sites; and a public input process. The plan proposes replacement of three existinq libraries with new facilities, the addition of three new branches, and remodelinq/expansion of five others at a total cost of$50.8 million (2010 dollars). Level of Service -rho en„��no r„��n+„ i �h,-�r„ n��+r�,.+ h�� n„+ o�+�hr�ho,� � io„oi „f � The Library Facilities Master Plan establishes a Level of Service (LOS) of 0.5 square feet per capita for the overall District, with a tarqet 0.5 square feet per capita within each of the five qeoqraphic reqions served. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 26 of 71 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan I Forecast of Future Needs . The LFMP uses a 2031 Spokane Vallev population estimate of 108,000 for its future proiections, consistent with the Citv of Spokane Vallev's GMA population allocation for qrowth within the existinq Citv limits. The District recoqnizes that new librarv facilities need to be built inside Spokane Vallev to provide adequate library services to its residents. Future facilities will be divided between a main branch and two future neiqhborhood branches. Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities +� +hroo .,,;�o� �f�+ho .,,�,., hr�.,�h A new main branch to replace the existinq Spokane Vallev Librarv should contain about 50,000 square feet of space and should be located on an arterial street within about one-half mile of the Spraque corridor between Dartmouth and Everqreen Roads. To better serve the Veradale and Greenacres areas, a new neiqhborhood branch of approximatelv 12,000 square feet should be built on District-owned propertv on Conklin Road, immediatelv south of Spraque Avenue. A second new branch to serve the South Valley should be built between Dishman-Mica and Everqreen Roads on or immediatelv south of 32� Avenue. Capital Projects and Financing Plan The future main branch is estimated to cost $a-a-415.56 million in �88�2010 dollars; the neighborhood branch would cost about $�5_1 million each. h„n,�� o +ho n �� f,.,�n,.;.,,. .r,o+hr,.J fr,r rhr�r„ n o,.+� r,f+hio � Besides construction costs and fees, the estimates include library materials, furnishinqs, and equipment. Voter-approved qeneral obliqation bonds are the normal financinq method for library proiects of this size. The DistricYs Librarv Facilities Master Plan proposes a three phase capital improvement schedule that includes all Spokane Valley proiects in the first two phases. The earliest feasible date for a District-wide bond election to carry out the proposed proiects is earlv 2013, which for purposes of the schedule is Year 1. Phase 1: Years 1 to 4 • Complete propertv purchases (Year 1) • Desiqn, construct, and open replacement Spokane Vallev branch (Years 1-4) Phase 2: Years 3 to 8 • Desiqn, construct, and open new Conklin Road branch (Years 3-5) • Sell existinq Spokane Vallev branch (Year 5) • Desiqn, construct, and open new South Vallev branch (Years 6-8) Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 27 of 71 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Tho I'lic+rir+ r�rnr�ncoc 4ho fnlln�niinn ror�i4ol imr�rnvomon4 crhorli ilo• � +.,�� Plo#ormino r�roforrorJ Inrotinnc fnr no�ni lihrorioc no"oi.,n t��.,,��.,,. ni�., D��r.�h000 Io.,.J fl,r lihrorioo C.+i. ��v - �`es��rr�i inrlinn onrJ r�i irrho� ci4o/c\ if nn# �IroorJ�i rinno (`r,.,o+r��.�+ ., ., hro.,.�h Coll o io+i.,..\/ollo�� hro.,.�h �A+., 9�1 � • , IT�hlu n ��c..,,��.,e r,,...,+.,i �h.�..,n;�+.c..+� .r�..:+��o...�e,.+� �.,.��:.,�.,..:.,..oi�., I �K9}2G� ?i-�A� �$Z ?i-�A� �AA$ ?i-�-� ��- �-� �9�2� I �le�ni Cv.nL� e\/�Ile�i Q^n nnn I i� � � � � � a a W'�"✓'�� I �� W'y'v�' � � � � a A � IGe e Ci. I �--�b � V�'� � � �r/ a a �a I �$�2� � � � �v �v a a �a I Table 4.12 Spokane Countv Librarv District six vear Capital Proiects and Financinq Plan (Assumes a 2013 bond issue approval) IProiect 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total I New Spokane Vallev 0 0 1 250' 800 7 380 7 380 0 16 810 Librarv I New Conklin Road 0 0 0 0 200 2 450 2 450 5 100 Librarv I New South Vallev 0 0 250' 0 0 0 0 250 Librarv" ITotal 0 0 1 500 800 7 580 9 830 2 450 22 160 IRevenue Sources IDistrict Funds 0 0 1 500 0 0 0 0 1 500 IGO Bonds 0 0 0 800 7 580 9 830 2 450 20 660 ITotal 0 0 1 500 800 7 580 9 830 2 450 22 160 I 'These expenses are reimbursable from voter-approved bond funds. "The South Vallev Librarv's desiqn, construction,and openinq is in 2018-2020,outside the Six Year Plan I Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 28 of 71 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan The Library District will r��+vrnTCirra��1° coordinate +^ �^�^r� with the City of Spokane Valley +^ f��-�-�.,',�,Tr+hor o�.�., ,.,,n ho �rr,�F� +„ ; .�+o f„+,,.o �h�.,,.o , in identifyinq and procurinq buildinq sites, planninq the bond issue election, in carrvinq out desiqn and construction of the new libraries. As the LFMP is updated, this Capital Facilities Plan will be amended to incorporate future chanqes. Operational Costs The Library District assumes that with efficient building design and continuing staff productivity improvements, a larger Valley Library and an eventual new branch can be operated at normal District funding levels of 50 cents per$1,000 of assessed valuation. 4.4.10 Parks and Recreation Spokane Valley has a wide range of s � � ,, recreational opportunities available to residents �� ' '�± and visitors. City parks, school play fields, golf ;� ':4, '�'K ' courses, trails, County parks and conservations T � �, ��` ��,". � � areas are all within close vicinity to Spokane `' ti�=��' '' � Valley residents. ' �`�` ;�� The City provides a system of local parks that ,�;4� �', � `�!� �� is managed by the Spokane Valley Parks and � � � '� � �' � � ��I - - �`=� ' Recreation Department. The Parks - :._ X - - Department is in the process of developing a - , -- ��=� �� - -.._ - - new Parks, Recreation, and Open Spaces � '''� -- - a--;.� Master Plan. When finished, this plan will offer - - - - ._-_�_ a detailed picture of the park, recreation and open space system, including changes and � improvements that will be made in the future. This section of the Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) provides summaries of the parks inventory, level of service (LOS), future park needs, proposed projects, and a financing plan for the next six years. Park Types Parks are classified by their size, service area and function. Spokane Valley uses the nationally recognized Park, Recreation, Open Space and Greenway Guidelines, to establish standard for parks planning. Major classifications include mini-park, neighborhood, school-park, community, large urban, various trail designations and special use facilities. The Parks Element, Chapter 9, provides a thorough description of park types used for planning purposes. Inventory of Existing Facilities The Parks Map, found at the end of this Chapter, shows the location of all parks within Spokane Valley. Table 4.13 provides an inventory of park and recreation facilities owned by Spokane Valley. These parks are used to calculate Spokane Valley's level of service for parks. The Parks Master Plan provides the most detailed inventory of parks, including equipment, structures and other miscellaneous park facilities. Table 4.13 Spokane Valley Park Facilities Spokane Valley Parks Acreage Status Neighborhood Parks Balfour Park 2.86 Developed Browns Park 8.03 Developed Castle Park 2.71 Minimally Developed Edgecliff Park 4.74 Developed Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 29 of 71 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Level of Service The Countywide Planning Policies for Spokane County requires all jurisdictions to adopt a level of service (LOS) standard for parks. Spokane Valley has the flexibility and freedom to adopt a LOS standard for parks that reflects the �y=;�,;, expressed need and desire of our community. �� The National Recreation and Parks Association ,�'`, �" , �' �� F �'�. -�f`� suggest that cities adopt LOS standards for �F, ��'�"-0,"� �_ � w�`. t different park types, such as mini (pocket), �y,��-, „�^<,�'�,,,� ;� '" ] -" �� - . � - neighborhood, community and major parks. �: 1VL4��,�y-�+ti��„�;' i��, � '� "�:� Spokane Valley does not have a well-developed ��'- � __�<__`. park system and will use total City-owned park ,� ,w;�. acres for its LOS measurement. � � '� `' , . �^�,��a'„�-�,Te�+'�,--^,�^,rts 1�--�s� ' � �� e�ek3;�ed °^�,Qevek#ed ^°r��l�s+r�-�,"�° k �^�'�" ��` �-`� �9na ��i�+�,,., „f ns n�n n� io �i,.��rro.,+ �:;�,_ I�,�� °r g._ . pi� GGITCTIT _ �;�s L��s � a�z f r�+„ n�r� i�n,� f„r ` o"or„ �nnn ro�„�o.,+� In 2006, Spokane Valley a�adopted a LOS of 1.92 acres/1000 people as its minimum LOS standard� T�hlu� �� ..,,�,.,e��,��e.,o,.�� e,e�„F�e..,:,.e parl�s, a��hewn i� Ta�E�-^��. Spokane Valley recognizes that �;+„�,,�e� schools, churches, natural areas and o,.°�e' ' °�•°'��°��•��° commercial enterprises all provide recreation opportunities for Spokane $�8�9 �� o� �..,�e�i�nnn Valley residents. These will all be taken into consideration when Spokane Valley determines the best location to purchase new park land. Forecast of Future Needs Spokane Valley has the capacity to accommodate an additional�8-,��16,493 people over the next 20 years within the current City limits. In order to maintain the ��adopted LOS of 1.92 acres/1000 people, Spokane Valley would have to add about 48-35 acres of park land over the next 20 years, with �13 acres in the first six years, as shown in Table 4.15. The Parks Master Plan provides a more detailed analysis of park and recreation needs by dividing the City into smaller service areas. Table 4.15 Future Park Demand Year Population Total Park Acres Acres Required at 1.92 Net Deficiency Acres Available acres/1000 I �88fi2011 �991,836 �172 �177 8-5 I ��2017 �4�96,307 �172 �185 -�4-13 I ��2031 �8�-,��107,604 �172 �93207 -4-9-35 I �`Assumes 20-year growth of�9;�5&16,493 people Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities In order to maintain the adopted 1.92 acres/1000 level of service standard, Spokane Valley �x+s� would need to add �13 acres of park land by the year �'�2017. �^ ^r��r +„ �,�,�ro�� +h,� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 31 of 71 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan I �.�ill ho � o.J +r, .Jo+or.,-,i.,o+ho hoo+ Ir,.�o+ir,.,o fr,r .,orL IoY,.J o oi+ir,.,o . . IT�hlu n �c o�.�� r�..�..:+.,n.,�i.,�:� To..M��rm Anruc�TGe...�.'.re� V��r �e An�ec ��.07 Alu4 Ducer. Anruc � �Q ��/�f1llfl I ��3 � �a� �v� a I �� mQ�� I *7(1� nf v.�rLl�nrJ�niill he v. rnh�cerJ�nii+hin firc+R� nf v.l�n Capital Projects and Financing Plan The following table details Spokane Valley's six year Parks and Recreation capital improvement financing plan. The table details projects that address level of service deficiencies (capacity projects)and other capital improvements (non-capacity) projects. T�hlu n e�o�.�� r�..:+��..:r.+:e� oi�., Ali.4e. Arr.i...r.4c :r.@� f1l1(1 I �� a �-� �-�- �-� T�4�1 D�rL I �nrJ Anrvi�ici+inn /7(1 �� a � ID�rL Imnrn�ie en+c �� r � r � r �� '�� 8, �A � I �} - �� IGe e Ci. Ir?ener�l Ciinrl ��--�QQ �QQ � IDC�TT fF1 � �� a �a �� s�� t�v I �s �89 �-99 �-99 �9 $� : � I =`�� a-;fAB $a-�A9 � �� a-,389 �58 �88 �88 �8 a-89 �98 $�-�9 I Table 4.17 Parks Capital Facilities Plan Note:Amounts in$1,000 IProiect 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total IPark Improvements 1,959 100 100 100 100 100 100 2 559 Swimminq Pool Upqrades Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 32 of 71 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.17 Parks Capital Facilities Plan Note:Amounts in$1,000 ITotal 1,959 100 100 100 100 100 100 2 559 IRevenue Source IGeneral Fund 1,959 50 50 50 50 50 50 2 259 IREET#1 — 50 50 50 50 50 50 300 IGrants I I 500 I I 500 ISpokane Countv ITotal 1,959 100 100 600 100 100 100 3 059 I 4.4.11 Public Safety The Spokane Valley Police Department is a contract law enforcement agency, partnering with the Spokane County Sheriff's Department to provide a safe environment for the citizens, businesses, and visitors of the City of Spokane Valley. This unique contracting relationship allows for the sharing of many of our resources, allowing both agencies to operate at peak efficiency without duplicating services. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 33 of 71 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Spokane Valley also contracts with Spokane County for judicial, jail and animal control services. I The total contract for public safety for �88�2011 totaled over $� 15.3 million, including approximately 100 commissioned police officers. Spokane Valley supports community oriented policing and recognizes it as an important complement to traditional law enforcement. In Spokane County, community policing is known as S.C.O.P.E., or Sheriff Community Oriented Policing Effort. The community policing model balances reactive responses to calls for service with proactive problem-solving centered on the causes of crime and disorder. Community policing requires police and citizens to join together as partners in the course of both identifying and effectively addressing these issues. About 364 Spokane Valley citizens are S.C.O.P.E volunteers. Community Survey The Community Preference Survey included questions to gauge the public's perception of police services. Results show that 85% of Spokane Valley residents believe police services are good, very good, or excellent, indicating a generally high level of confidence in the police force. Only 27% of respondents expressed a willingness to pay additional taxes to have improved police services. Inventory of Existing Facilities The Spokane Valley Police Precinct is located at 12710 E. Sprague and houses patrol and detective divisions, the traffic unit and administrative staff. The Precinct also includes a-�e�e�t� �+„r�,.o f�,.,r+„ �.,,� a Spokane County District Court. Spokane Valley is served by�four S.C.O.P.E. stations, shown in the following table. T�hlu A �4 Cr...4�ne\/�Ile.i C !`!1 D C cM4ii.r.c �le'nH� h�rh��v`�i � � �� \A/ec�+ ,�\/�II� 11(17 �Inr+h Arnnnne �� 7�l1l1�I \A/ilhiirfF 70 �� 1(1R71��c+ 1t� (`en+%\/�II� 11t AI C�iern n DrJ CrJncnli� S77 C Thie n DrJ C�c+ �-uycorr I Table 4.18 Spokane Vallev S.C.O.P.E stations Neiqhborhood Location Neiqhborhood Location Universitv 10621 East 15 Trentwood 2400 N.Wilbur#79 Edqecliff 522 S.Thierman Rd. Central Vallev 115 N. Everqreen Rd. Level of Service Public safety is a priority for the City of Spokane Valley. It is difficult to determine at this time, an adequate and measurable level of police protection. Spokane Valley will monitor the performance of the Spokane County Sheriff's Department and will adjust the contract for services as necessary to ensure an adequate level of police protection. Forecast of Future Needs Future needs for police protection will be determined as a part of the annual budget process. Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities Spokane Valley is not planning to construct any new law enforcement facilities at this time. Capital Projects and Financing Plan Spokane Valley is not planning to construct any new law enforcement facilities at this time. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 34 of 71 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan In 1988, the intergovernmental agency known as the Spokane Regional Solid Waste System (System) was formed by interlocal agreement between the City of Spokane, Spokane County and all other cities and towns within the County. The System is responsible for implementing solid waste management plans, planning and developing specific waste management programs and updating solid waste plans for the entire County. The System is managed by the City of Spokane, which uses its structure to carry out the various solid waste management programs for our region. In Spokane Valley, solid waste services are provided by private haulers licensed by the Washington Utility and Transportation Commission (W.U.T.C.) through franchise agreements. Waste Management of Spokane provides residential and commercial garbage services and weekly curbside recycling collection; Sunshine Disposal provides only commercial services. At this time, Spokane Valley residents are allowed to self-haul their garbage to an appropriate dumping site. Inventory of Existing Facilities The Regional Solid Waste System includes a Waste to Energy facility located at 2900 South Geiger, and two recycling/transfer stations. One of the stations is located within Spokane Valley at 3941 N. Sullivan Road south of Trent and across from the Spokane Industrial Park; the other is located in north Spokane County at the intersection of Elk-Chattaroy Road and Highway 2. Landfills are necessary to provide disposal for solid waste that cannot be recycled or incinerated, or that exceeds the capacity of the WTE Facility. The Spokane County Regional Health District licenses six privately owned landfills in Spokane County. Level of Service The minimum Regional Level of Service Standards requires solid waste services to meet all State and Federal regulations. Forecast of Future Needs Spokane Valley is participating on the update of the Spokane County Waste Management Plan (SCWMP). The SCWMP update process will determine future needs for solid waste disposal. Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities The updated Spokane County Solid Waste Management Plan will provide information on future regional solid waste facilities. Finance Plan The updated Spokane County Solid Waste Management plan will include a financing plan for future regional solid waste facilities. 4.4.15 Stormwater Facilities Stormwater runoff in Spokane Valley flows to a combination of public and private facilities. In I developed areas, runoff infiltrates into the around or flows �^�^�^ �+roo+ ,.,,++or� �n,� ;� ,�,�n„�o,� �to drywells in public road rights-of-way, drywells on private property and grassy swales with overflow drywells in easements on private property. There are advantages and disadvantages to relying on on-site facilities for all stormwater management. One advantage is that on-site facilities are typically constructed with private funds and can be integrated into the development as a green space amenity. However, on-site facilities are sometimes not well maintained. Their capacity may be diminished over time or they may fail entirely during large runoff events. On-site facilities may take up large portions of a development site, thereby reducing the effective density that can be accommodated in that area. In 2004, the Spokane Valley City Council created a stormwater utility to develop and maintain storm � drainage systems on Citv owned ��land. To create revenues for the stormwater utility operations, the Council adopted an annual fee per Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU). Residential ERUs are based on the number of single-family dwellings, while Commercial ERUs are based on the square footage of impervious surface associated with a business or commercial development. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 47 of 71 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Inventory of Existing Facilities Spokane Valley's inventory of stormwater facilities, most of which are integral to the safe function of � our street system, consists of about �-,�997,200 drywells, �1900 bio-infiltration swales, �61 detention ponds, and one retention pond. Other facilities include curb inlets, bridge drains, and culverts, all of which require monitoring and maintenance. The retention pond, located at Dishman- Mica Road. and 32�d Ave., was constructed as a part of a road project and provides a disposal point I for water flowing from Chester Creek. The inventory does not reflect stormwater structures located on private properties that do not serve the public street drainaqe svstem. Level of Service The Spokane County Board of Commissioners adopted new regional level of service standards for stormwater in 2004 as a part of the Countywide Planning Policies update;- `Floodin,�of propertv outside desi�nated draina�vs, def�cto draina�vs, easements, flood zones or other a�roved draina�f�cilities, during the desi� precipitation or runo�f event prescribed in the standards of the governin� agencv or jurisdiction, shall be prevented within the reasonable probabilitv a�forded bv such� standards. Impact to buildin�s and accessorv structures shall be avoided to the maximum extent practicable bv evaluatin� the e,�fects of a100,vear rain event, and implementing measures to ensure that the runo�f attendant to such event is directed awav f�'om such buildin�s and accessory structures. Anv stormwater discharge to surf�ce or ground waters must meet federal, state and local rec�uirements for water c�ualitv treatment, stormwater runo�fand in�ltration." The standards reflect current best practices that are established in adopted stormwater design guidelines. Spokane Valley follows said guidelines in reviewing and approving new development and is therefore in compliance with the regional LOS standards for stormwater runoff. Forecast of Future Needs Spokane Valley will continue to use private, on-site treatment facilities for new development and will install drywells, swales and other facilities as needed for new street improvement projects. Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities Location and capacities of future facilities is dependent on the location and size of new development, future public street projects, and projects that will address current problem areas within the City. Future updates to this Capital Facilities Plan will incorporate capital programming for stormwater facilities. Capital Projects and Financing Plan � The City currently charges a $�9 21 annual stormwater utility fee per Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) to generate revenues for stormwater facility engineering, maintenance and administration. IThe stormwater fee is expected to generate$a-� 1.8 million annually. Transportation Facilities Inventory of Existing Facilities This section of the Capital Facilities Plan includes transportation facilities within Spokane Valley, including streets, bridges, pathways and sidewalks. Street maintenance is not included as a part of the Capital Facilities Plan. Spokane Valley is responsible for about 455 miles of public roads, including 51 miles of Urban Principal Arterials, 61 miles of Urban Minor Arterials, 44 miles of Urban Collectors, and 298.85 miles of Local Access Streets. Table 4.36 provides a list of all arterial intersections within Spokane Valley. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 48 of 71 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Funding for the operation and expansion of the City's transportation system falls into several categories, which include federal, state and city funds. Some sources consist of reliable annual funds while others are periodic, such as grants. The use, availability and applicability of these various sources are not always at the discretion of the City. Spokane Valley will develop a track record with funding agencies as time goes on, which will help make to make more reliable funding assumptions. A summary of expected federal, state and local funding sources for the City's six year Capital Improvement Program is shown in Table 4.39. The following is a summary of transportation funding options. Federal Assistance These funds are authorized under the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act for the 21St Century (SAFETEA-21) and are administered by the Federal Highway Administration through Washington State Department of Transportation and the Metropolitan Planning Organization (Spokane Regional Transportation Council). Federal funding programs include Bridge Replacement (BR), Congestion Management and Air Quality (CMAQ) and the Surface Transportation Program (STP). State Assistance The Washington State Transportation Improvement Board administers State transportation programs, including the Urban Corridor Program (UCP), the Urban Arterial Program (UAP), and the Sidewalk Program (SP). Citv Funds Spokane Valley contributes revenues from the General Fund and the Real Estate Excise Tax funds for transportation projects. The City also receives State Motor Fuel Tax and Restricted State Fuel Tax. IT�hle A.4Q Ci.._Ve�.-T.-�.,�.�,.,.-+�+i.,., !'`�.�,i+�l C�.�ili+ie� �.,.J Ci.,�.,.�i.,.�. DI�., I �� I /.J.,II�.-� i.�, 4h.,��.�,.J�l Ii+�,,, o.,,�e..+ne r+�,,., �F}F�2.Pf. �. �9#2� I � - �9EfF62 �9HR� �i�6HR� I � ❑�.�e,o,.�,� Q.�,�,.e � �s �Tn� I � ❑.,.�.�,.,�„ n„e �Qn t+� „s nn,,,,.e+„ ri,,.� I I�D aa �Pnas I � D�rL Dn�rJ if 7/DC (lnl�r\ Qrn�rJ�ni��r+n InrJi�n� CTD/I I\ �T� �97�R TrTo7 I4 �� rR7 �T1� Ica N�� ,��„�E�FteRSle„ z��nn��c��ir„�„ o,�+,,nn�ss��'� �S� �Tan �TQ�n I � SA�44 �-r' ��a I � �,4 �o�z �o�zn Ig i.,,��.,�ic��u�„�., i.,+e.�e..+�,,.,orr �A �o�s ��zn� I � �Qn �o�oQ I a-9 �3� �o��a I � (l+he��CerJ �Pnnn �Pnnn I � D�vemen+�A�n�nemen+Drnnrom i„ �i n....e�� Pnnn �Pnnn I � CTCD D��ieh�nL f i}�i` �,r�� Q��1 r I _ _ �n�n�T..+�i�. ��n$ ��^-�ono� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 61 of 71 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan � Table 4.38 Six-Year Transportation Capital Facilities and Financinq Plan � 2011 � dollars in thousands � Item Prolect Description Primary C� Total � # Source Amount Amount � 1 Park Road-#2 PE Onl -Broadwa to Indiana STP U 5 35 � 2 Indiana Ave Extension-3600'e/o Sullivan Rd to Mission&Flora UCP 53 375 � 3 Ar onne Road-190 to Trent CMAQ 101 713 � 4 Indiana/Sullivan Intersection PCC STA 249 1,216 � 5 Pines Corridor ITS: S ra ue to Trent CMAQ 216 1,609 � 6 Barker Rd/BNSF Grade Se aration PE Onl Other Fed 0 1,900 � 7 Broadwav Cc�Arponne/Mullan Intersections PCC(PE/RW Onlv) STP(U) 37 271 � 8 Mission Ave.-Flora to Barker PE/RW Onl STP U 66 488 � 9 Pavement Manaqement Proqram-Arterials Other Fed 2,000 4,000 � 10 Pavement Manaqement Proqram-Local Access C� 2,000 2,000 � 11 STEP Paveback C� 602 602 � 12 Sullivan/Euclid PCC Intersection(PE/RW Onlv) STP(U) 22 163 � 13 Sullivan West Brid e BR 0 668 � 2011 Totals: 5 351 14 040 I IT�hle A.4Q Ci.._Ve�.-T.-�..�.�,.,.+�+i.,., !'`�.�,i+�l C�.�ili+ie� �.,.J Ci..�...�i.,r. DI�.. I �� I /.J.,Il�rc in +h.,��c�n.Jc\ I � o.,,�e..+ne r+�,,., �}t�a�/ � �6t21 � �# - �eNrse At�sa a� A+�tet�� SAA,44 �Tn� �9�z I � �Qn �ooQ I � (l+he�FCerJ �Qnnn �onnn � � ��Qnnn �onnn I � CTCD D��ieh�nL �,r7S7 �T7�7 I � � �PR(1 �Tl1R1 I �r c��ii�„ ., o„�.��nie�+Q.�,�,.e � �-rn� �o��s I � nn��,��,.��n„e �.�+�Q�.�� o�a �Qna I _ _ �n��T,.+��. �-453 �533 � Table 4.38 Six-Year Transportation Capital Facilities and Financinq Plan � 2012 � dollars in thousands � Item Proiect Description Primarv C� Total � # Source Amount Amount � 6 Barker Rd/BNSF Grade Se aration PE Onl Other Fed 0 2,700 � 8 Mission Ave.-Flora to Barker PE/RW Onl STP U 58 430 � 9 Pavement Mana ement Pro ram—Arterials Other Fed 2,000 4,000 � 10 Pavement Mana ement Pro ram-Local Access Cit 2,000 2,000 � 13 Sullivan West Brid e BR 0 1,435 � 14 Broadwa Ave. Extension—Flora to Barker PE Onl Cit 265 265 � 15 Ever reen/32nd-16th to 32nd Ever reen to SR-27 PE Onl Cit 312 312 � 16 Park Road-#2(RW/CN Onlv)-Broadwav to Indiana STP(U) 135 1,000 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 62 of 71 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan � 17 Saltese/Sullivan Siqnal Developers 62 250 � 18 Sullivan Rd. Corridor Traffic Studv(I-90 to Welleslev) STP(U) 27 200 � 19 University Rd/I-90 Overpass Study STP(U) 34 250 � 20 Broadwa Ar onne/Mullan Intersections PCC CN Onl STP U 280 2,075 � 21 Sullivan/Euclid PCC Intersection CN Onl STP U 169 1,253 � 2012 Totals: 5,342 16,170 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 63 of 71 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan IT�hle A.4Q Ci.._Ve�.-T.�.,�.�,.,.-+�+i.,.�, !'`�.�,i+�l C�.�ili+ie� �.�..J Ci.,�.,.�i.�.r. DI�.�, I �� I /.J.,II�.� i.�, 4h.,��.�,.J�\ I � o.,.�e..+ne .,+�,,.. D";�--r�vr�y_ � �6t21 I � - �@FAK62 �}8HF}� ,Q}�}@HR� I � (l+he�FCerJ �Qnnn n nna I � o�, e.,+nn� .,+o.,.,..� i„ �i n.. � �Qnnn �onnn � a-a` $� �r�n� �o�� I � AAiss16^ n,�� Ig.�+,�-�-�..,�Q�.�eF �T�� n roa� I � o�.� o,.�.� +r�irni n.,i„� ❑.,,�,�,.,�„+„ i.,,��..� � ��a� ��on� I � �P1R RR7 I _ _ 7f1�7�s..4�lc. �Q�OG ��` I � Table 4.38 Six-Year Transportation Capital Facilities and Financinq Plan � 2013 � dollars in thousands � Item Proiect Description Primarv C� Total � # Source Amount Amount � 9 Pavement Manaqement Proqram-Arterials Other Fed 2,000 4,000 � 10 Pavement Manaqement Proqram-Local Access C� 2,000 2,000 � 13 Sullivan Road West Brid e BR 0 768 � 14 Broadwa Ave. Extension—Flora to Barker PE Onl Cit 265 265 � 15 Ever reen/32nd-16th to 32nd Ever reen to SR-27 PE Onl Cit 312 312 � 16 Park Road-#2 RW/CN Onl -Broadwa to Indiana STP U 540 4,000 � 22 Mission Ave.-Flora to Barker CN Onl STP U 536 3 969 � 2013 Totals: 5,653 15,314 I IT�hle A.4Q Ci.._Ve�.T.�.,�.�,.,.+�+i.,., !'`�.�,i+�l C�.�ili+ie� �.,.J Ci.,�.,.�i.,r. DI�.� I �� I /.J.,II�.-� i.�, +h.,��.�,.J�\ � l�e� �' S� �e�a� � �# - �eNrse A�s�+� A+x�s�� I � o�„erv.e.,+nn�.,�,.erv.e.,+o.,,,..�w, n.+e.��i� (l+he��CerJ �Pnnn �nna I � o�„erv.e.,+nn�.,�„erv.e.,+o.,,,..�w, i„ �i n....e�� }�. �Pnnn �Pnnn I �r c��ii�„�., o,.�.��nie�+n.�,�,. � ��Pznn � I � o�.� o,.�.� +r�irni n.,i"� ❑.,,�,�,.,�„+„ i.,,��..� �� no �r�a� I � �,.,�� o„��.� z�+„��+h ��o �oass I � (l+he�FCerJ �T� �otn I �9 �_'' �o�n I _ _ �n��.,+�i�. �roo� a��o�� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 64 of 71 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan � Table 4.38 Six-Year Transportation Capital Facilities and Financinq Plan � 2014 � dollars in thousands � Item Proiect Description Primarv C� Total � # Source Amount Amount � 9 Pavement Manaqement Proqram-Arterials Other Fed 2,000 4,000 � 10 Pavement Mana ement Pro ram-Local Access Cit 2,000 2,000 � 13 Sullivan Road West Brid e BR 0 8,440 � 23 Barker Road—South Citv Limits to Applewav(PE Onlv) C� 236 236 � 24 Bowdish Road-32nd to 8`h PE Onl STP U 52 384 � 25 Broadway Ave. Extension—Flora to Barker(PE Only) UCP 100 500 � 26 Flora Road—Spraque to Mission(PE Onlv) C� 216 216 � 27 Sidewalk Infill Proqram STP(E) 45 330 � 2014 Totals: 4 649 16 106 I IT�hle A.4Q Ci.._Ve�.-T.-�..�.�,.,.-+�+i.,.. !'`�.�,i+�l C�.�ili+ie� �...J Ci..�...�i..r. DI�.�, � �4 I �,�„��.,.-� ;., +�,,,,�.,,,,�� '- � � � �# - �e�se �� A�e� I � (l+he�aCerJ �Qnnn �onnn � � ��Qnnn �onnn � �r � ��nn �r � I �g �e�.,��p o,.��z2p�+,.��+h ��Tn�� Q� I � (l+he�aCerJ on �o�tn I � �°� �°� I _ _ �n�n��,.+�i�� rsm � Table 4.38 Six-Year Transportation Capital Facilities and Financinq Plan � 2015 � dollars in thousands � Item Proiect Description Primarv C� Total � # Source Amount Amount � 9 Pavement Manaqement Proqram-Arterials Other Fed 2,000 4,000 � 10 Pavement Manaqement Proqram-Local Access C� 2,000 2,000 � 13 Sullivan Road West Bridqe BR 0 8,440 � 23 Barker Road—South Citv Limits to Applewav(PE Onlv) C� 236 236 � 24 Bowdish Road-32nd to 8`h PE Onl STP U 52 384 � 25 Broadwa Ave. Extension—Flora to Barker RW/CN Onl UCP 100 500 � 26 Flora Road—S ra ue to Mission PE Onl Cit 216 216 � 27 Sidewalk Infill Pro ram STP E 36 270 � 28 Ever reen ITS Im rovements CMAQ 17 126 I Everareen/32nd-16th to 32nd, Everqreen to SR-27 29 RW/CN Onl STP U 54 400 � 2015 Totals: 4,711 16,572 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 65 of 71 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan IT�hle A.4Q Ci.._Ve�.-T.�.,�.�,.,.-+�+i.,.�, !'`�.�,i+�l C�.�ili+ie� �.�..J Ci.,�.,.�i.�.r. DI�.�, I �� I /.J.,II�.� i.�, 4h.,��.�,.J�\ I � o.,.�e..+ne .,+�,,.. D";�--r�vr�y_ � �6t21 I � - �@FAK62 �}8HF}� ,Q}�}@HR� I � (l+he�FCerJ �Qnnn n nna I � o�, e.,+nn� .,+o.,....� i,. �i n.. � �Qnnn �onnn � � n+he��re.� �o�aa ��Qno I � �4 ��n Iz2�2 n,,,,ie�.,�„ �.,+e„��,.,, i i„�„e.��+„+,, c„e.,,.ee„ c�o �4 �on� � �3 bS4� ��' �o�o � �4 kJ,4� �P� �-ra� I �c c�ir„�., o,.�.� io�nnrni,..,i,n ��..r.�+,.�ni°iie�ie„ CT� �Tn �onn I � c��ii�„�., o,.�.� ni,..+h �.,+e.,��,..,iQ�,.°i,.�.,r_��i..h� � �s ss I � Tro.,+icp�am_noi o�"+.,R�rUor T��r., i � no"o�� Pz� s�� I � o�.� i c.,.�„��e i.,+e.�e..+�,..,orr CT� �Po �oza � �$ SA/�44 �o�n �o�n a � �8 SAA,44 �Qs —,�o�nn I � �vTR� �o71S I _ _ 7l1�C�T..4�Ic. �P7�0 ��o�C4 � Table 4.38 Six-Year Transportation Capital Facilities and Financinq Plan � 2016 � dollars in thousands � Item Proiect Description Primarv C� Total � # Source Amount Amount � 9 Pavement Manaqement Proqram-Arterials Other Fed 2,000 4,000 � 10 Pavement Manaqement Proqram-Local Access C� 2,000 2,000 � 25 Broadwav Ave. Extension—Flora to Barker(RW/CN Onlv) UCP 812 4,062 � 27 Sidewalk Infill Pro ram STP E 162 1,200 � 28 Ever reen ITS Im rovements CMAQ 79 582 I Everqreen/32nd-16th to 32nd, Everpreen to SR-27 29 (RW/CN Onlv) STP(U) 647 4,791 � 30 Applewav Extension-Universitv to Everqreen STP 127 406 � 31 Greenacres Trail Plannin Stud Sullivan Rd.to Libert Lake STP E 28 210 � 32 Mansfield Extension-Pines SR27 to 300-ft East of Houk Rd Cit 136 136 � 33 Millwood Urban Trail-Fancher Rd.to Ever reen Rd. STP E 59 439 � 34 Park Rd/BNSF Grade Se aration Other Fed. 31 750 � 35 Sullivan Rd ITS Broadwa to 24th CMAQ 183 1,356 � 2016 Totals: 6,264 19,932 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 66 of 71 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan � � €eE4eKa{ �ta#e 9#heF S+�y �elal €e�eFa{ �Eate 8ihe� SiEy �eEal €eE4eFa{ �#a#e 9#k}e� S+�y �eEa{ �a�a � � � � �a,�s � �s �s � � � � � � �� a- � �a �a � � �aes �e �e �ea� �aa-� �e�e �e �e �,a� �aa-� � �a �a �a �a �a �a�a �e �a � � �a�e �a �a � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �a#a �s �s �s �a �a �a,� � � �a-� � �a,� �a-� � �-a-� � �s �g �s �a �a �a�z �s � � �aa �z � � � �aa �a S� S�ao� S� S�a;aaa �a � �a�a S�a�a �� S�a�a $�aaa �a�a S�� a Table 4.39 Siz-Year Transportation Improvement Proqram Summarv 2011 throuph 2016(in$1,000) Secured Pro'ects Planned Pro'ects Totals ear Federal State Other C� Total Federal State Other C� Total Federal State Other C� Total �2011 �.832 � �.��7 � �.87� �.339 � � �.6�2 �.17� �.171 � �.1�2 �.351 1$ 4.040 �2012 � � � � � �.846 � � �.284 1�5 740 1�0 218 � � �.342 1$ 6.170 �2013 � � � � � �.5�7 � � �653 1�.314 �.5�7 � � �653 1$ 5.314 �2014 � � � � � �.369 �2�88 �0 �4 649 1�6 106 �9 369 $2.088 � �649 1$ 6.106 �2015 � � � � � �773 �.�88 � �.711 1�.572 �.773 �.088 � �.711 1$ 6.572 2016 � � � � � 1$ 0.057 $3.574 � $6.264 1$ 9.932 1$ 0.057 $3.574 � $6.264 1$ 9.932 tals 3 204 282 1 007 807 5 300 52 891 8 325 455 31 163 92 834 56 095 8 607 1 462 31 970 98134 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 67 of 71 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan I T�MIe A A!1 Civ Ve�r Tr�v.cr...r4�4i..n Irv.r.r...iew. v.4 Dr..r.r�w. 7l1�l1 TMr..��r.M 7l1�C./ir. Q� !1!1l11 e IDrninn4c �•ii4hn��4 I n �I 11A�4rM�•ii4hin Fvic4inn Gncn��rnnc ID��n4�l�m� Dri.ien4 Ile r.4ii.v. �� I �`��r�i i C�iorrv n+n Donr�nc+ri in+�nrl�eiirlon+r�+hroo lonoc �nii+h R�c+ � ��P�nn I Q+h Avoniio Dhoco � (`�rnohon Donr.nc+nin+Q+h Avo.+�o+hroo lono con+inn �& �� I ��r�F�h�co '�_ D�rL+n CJon nc+ri in+Q+h ��io +n�+hroo_I�no con+inn �� nii+h n irh nii++or cirlo�ni�ILc �nrl hiLo I�noc � ��Pn nn I Q+h Avoni io Dhoco Z flinLov+r� Donr.nc+n in+Q+h Avo +�o+hroo lono con+inn � � I 4nr�le�ni�v Cv+onci _ C�iorivroon Cv+onrl 4r�nlo v Rl�irl �nii+h � iil+i_I�no +.,T�tih�rioT �� Po nn Donr�nc+riin++r�4 lon orl�eio�i�ed n n+or }iirn lono cirlo�n olLc irh A_ rvii++or onrl c�or�rm��ii�+� � I �qor�e,�-Dr,�rl Cnr,LonE-f�rPE�l��6' Tr�n+ Donr�nc+riin++n� `) lono n irhorl or+oriol � I nr.,�,�,.,�„ � nrn ornn��ii�., ,�a--aa�-88 I �r�orl�eio�i A�io Clr�ro+r� QorLor pon�nc+riin++r�4 lon Clr�ro+n QorLor F Q�n na I (`orn�h��TriinL c'vl�°c Qv+rn'zv" ArJrl CQ+n inL I o o+r. r orl �a Ciinlirl A�io/Clr�ro Drl Clr�ro Ciinlirl+r. Ciinlirl Ciinlirl Cll.r�+� Donl.nc+riin++r. �iirlo 0 7 lono chniilrlororl �� I � IDon�nc+nin+ In+orcon+ir�n in D(`(` � I Donr�nc+riin+onrl�eiirlon+r��c+onrlorrl+hroo lono orForiol c+roo+�eii+h n inc� onrl cirlo�eiolLc � `)�P� nn I � � I i�,,.,r�"o�„o.,+�+„�.,+o o..+��., in��i i�.,o CD'�7/Dinoc/�R+h In+orcon+inn �� I I Ini�iorci+�i/Cnron o In+orcon+inn Donl�no nh�l+n n+�eii+h nr�rFlonrl �� .,+.. ro+o ., .,+ � a��Pnn � �4� - �e8 � Table 4.40 Six Year Trans ortation Im rovement Pro ram 2010 Throu h 2015 in 1 000 � Pro�ects without Local Match within Existin Resources � Pro'ect Name Pro'ect Descri tion Total Cost I 32nd Avenue- Everqreen to Reconstruct and widen to three lanes with Best curbs and sidewalks. 2,237.00 I 8th Avenue Phase 1-Carnahan Reconstruct 8th Ave. to a three-lane section to Havana with curb utter sidewalks and bike lanes. 3 483.00 I 8th Avenue Phase 2- Park to Reconstruct 8th Ave. to a three-lane section Dickey with curb, qutter, sidewalks and bike lanes. 5,120.00 I 8th Avenue Phase 3- Dickev to Reconstruct 8th Ave. to a three-lane section Carnahan with curb utter sidewalks and bike lanes. 4 667.00 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 68 of 71 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan I Applewav Extension - Everqreen Extend Applewav Blvd. with a multi-lane to Tshirley facility includinq curbs and sidewalks. 13,219.00 Reconstruct to 3-lane roadway w/center turn lane, sidewalks, curb&qutter and Barker Road-8th to A lewa stormwater 5 475.00 I Barker Road -Spokane River to Trent Reconstruct to a 2-lane curbed arterial 6,530.00 I Broadway (c�Arqonne/Mullan Intersections PCC Reconstruct intersections in PCC 1 556.00 � Broadwa Ave- Flora to Barker Reconstruct to 3-lanes Flora to Barker 6 824.00 I Carnahan Truck Lane-8th to City Limits, Add SB truck Lane to road 5,973.00 Euclid Ave/Flora Rd- Flora Euclid to Euclid. Euclid Flora to Reconstruct to provide a 2-lane, shouldered Barker arterial 5 408.00 � Flora Road -Spraque to Mission Reconstruct&widen to 3-lane roadwav 5.175.00 � Kiernan &Sullivan PCC Reconstruct Intersection in PCC 1 350.00 I Park Road-#3-Spraque to Reconstruct and widen to a standard three- Broadway lane arterial street with curbs and sidewalks 4,244.00 I Pines Corridor ITS: Spraque to 16th Traffic Si nal Control S stem for Corridor 785.00 I Improvements to intersection (Dual lane SR27/Pines/16th Intersection Roundabout) 3,189.00 I Universitv/Spraque Intersection Replace asphalt pavement with portland PCC cement concrete avement. 1 642.00 � TOTAL 76.877.00 I Potential Annexation Areas/Urban Services The Growth Management Act requires that counties designate urban growth areas (UGAs). The City of Spokane Valley identified lands adjacent to the City within existing UGAs that would likely be developed for urban uses and potentially be annexed to the City. In order to assess the need for capital facilities, the City has identified existing service providers within the Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs). This assessment should help identify the effects a potential annexation area will have on existing levels of service. Table 4.41 Existing Urban Service Providers within Potential Annexation Areas(PAAs) PAAs Northwood Northeast East Southeast South Ponderosa Edgecliff Domestic Water Pasadena Park Consolidated Consolidated Vera Vera S.C.W.D.No.3 East Spokane Hutton Settlement Consolidated S.C.W.D.No.3 Fire 8�Emergency Services F.D.No.1&9 F.D.No.1 F.D.No.1 F.D.No.1&8 F.D.No.1&8 F.D.No.8 F.D.No.1&8 Law Enforcement Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Libraries S.C.Library Dist. S.C.Library Dist. S.C.Library Dist. S.C.Library Dist. S.C.Library Dist. S.C.Library Dist. S.C.Library Dist. Parks 8�Open Space Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Public Schools W.V.S.D.&S.D.81 E.V.S.D C.V.S.D. C.V.S.D. C.V.S.D. C.V.S.D. W.V.S.D.&S.D.81 Public Transit Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Sanitary Sewer Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Not Sewered Spokane County Solid Waste/Recycle Waste Mgmt. Waste Mgmt. Waste Mgmt. Waste Mgmt. Waste Mgmt. Waste Mgmt. Waste Mgmt. Storm water Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Street Cleaning Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Transportation Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 69 of 71 p ______'______ _____ ' e ` ____ _____________ ___ ,nppmooa_ _ o_ ____ � _ _ _ _ _ _ ,____ _____ _�'_pg r.e�+r_`____ _i__ _ ea,eae„aea,k � ' Ma 4.1 aw°� � � � e�o„ee, ° z6aa �� ° �„��a��„ ;z6aa �„-�a�eo �; �,a�e.� ?sa P n�„«��, � Y Dlsi�'kiH3 I Compem 'z44ry� PT � 35 m�h36--e�l 3 ' �g 32 �� 3 34 -� _ 35 36 -� 31 32 � water D1Str1Cts(]Y i ��° Be� � q= � c soua a V�ell lle`cld5' / � I G� K H��on �_ O�i�'Y:... - a a c" P�" � I ` �yc __ _ "u^��m � '__-, `-'� �fe„o 9enlement _ ely o�T�i`:3�i�-{iiL �' -.:19 i' beimiel g�� - O�'cLa�tl.4ceovl�� -� �� F' \IObLLeI � a� I�rteaHon ____ m� cha� � Home Pe�'L � Dls��'kt:.- u e � o j9P � �� 02 0� pq•Y � ;�Vc �5 y 4 04 r�5� 3 02 - "'P]• I� O6 OS _ �eo S � � �c„-m.� I, �, Legend _ _"Spp ___ °�� _ao D '� � __ _____ � e1e• Sp San"e �w � � M�nidpelWaterPUrveyors g�, �a�� ♦ [a st lat ' - 3� n.p� °°a � ea.�d I, - c;ry oespo�ne water se,.d�e �' e �z �•",�� o� �09 lo �a lz ', �,oa a �tiTyofspokenevalley �or�o �ug @ � _�boo.onaat'. • �I� `��° ♦ oro��peweux�as 1vB� I en [ � b,r� °� I m� Co�P��A{ \I�'� O' a19 I,�� Gronp B Nell Heads ° __ L��j� �a HomePm�k � ° �� m� �s � �o � -- - C ua t a �I' '"-$ i Urba�iGro�cthArea � = = 3 0 3 � s& [b ion�l � I �� e ' D' �p19�1 �WeterBOdies 1#} tlJ � ]gm o1J ' $�1 �le 1 13 18 y] CarnLOpe� u9 ' Hotchh�so 9 - •e � le[� �� / `I [�i � ^a�y _ I� bL, 3 .--��, 'I:�� 1 •I �o � 1 Dis��'e�'• Dis�iic..�.:.16 ' •�\IOde�v Elecl�'e z a �° �\ate C �p n I � � u,$ SIieII ��3 m C� �� h 4 19` �620 •1 2 1ha 3 24 �1�3 6h�]A 20 _ EJ I �� .�°y'I' .�n � �n ,� _�__e mey' aii � Eas�SpoAaneU 8 �h� 3v. b gg4�"� I, � , __ ___l{a�e'..11_--��__ ________ mC��n a ¢o e�_ - _____� _____i_ _ .�� Olsvk�� o - - i ' g �ew 9 i � -!� � �� n� m t e wv,�a g ��L " 2k� m 23-- 9' 29 4 m� h a�a,e � _ `�?b_ _� 25 ' ono3o 29 �& '�'°I�r/� 6 9pSane-0i ' �,____ ' . � C '-3}erei„ T=�y � � zsim I � � __ �__�_ ;___ ]I a t �'�t " - � [,bano�� __F_ Maplocahon � '�h Cltcatn,� 'I "�i�ibeJbn Pod. � Dlsvt2tML �I �� spo�aoe�va��m '�i nt4��'��nia' i� �,U � c+' sen � 'e�� I 36 35 31 � >3� �33� � 35 � 315 32 E�PecHveDate:AY/A\/A\XA 36 �� I - I s�e 3 Y row e " � y � � �� y 8°"°T° '� I rd�oaviceho lY-1X _ _ i , i '...'.. . �� K_ na'--�— zo_ _ a__ _�S•o�:�-'x_-y—_ _—__�_'o� I i � �' O Y� � , o ba g � 6 � �� o� e� . m�, � � --- ' e � � _, /\ ��' � m. � tl —� —�h a-- �ll e, � <> — --� � �g�� II � _ta aa,�_a .a,� � �--------�,n—�,—-----------------'— 5,.�� . � --- 1 ---°° —�,b— Pu � , � ' i, i j�^alk.y a & i �o`" � _ � ma� � _____eg ..ab p � � �I II - 0 OS 1 2Miles o� cm m. O]8� �'I ' 0 40 4°'� g '`��03 :2,�v.l an oee � i � a I I I °tlWo G� I � O6 SpL �°L� _ I 020 � O] I PS � c P �> , �ldf✓ r�ous '��?A43 • I ''€�� co -�_ _# � i � � � ,os 2A,45 ,� a= .r c� a �arm� i� �'�, I o' '. . I a i � �°s�° d�. � b t �..,do � � �e i ` �� i'"�sp��e i i �� i zo�o h . � a c�fs m r��c mu c -�ca�e�. �' s^m , rt� oa,�. �.� 5 � _ I I � �s`O��' i I blsirict � I�g I _ _ _ Deve(y �Deyarimen5 D��r�on ofP�ann'�%/�o,i 9_I-IOOO.�h ___ _____-_ I _ _ _ _ _ _______ __ ______________ ___ ____________ _ _ _ _ _ e„_____ ________ _ _ _ ____ _ ___ _ _ I --- ---- ---- -----,-----,---- ---- ----------•--------------- � � , , smnoo 94, � � � � � � , 8 8 � o � � � 8 � � Map 4.2 ��'----- ---------- ----j---- --------- ----;----- --------------- -------------- ---------------{---------��-- � , Fire Districts _5�0 ---- ---- -----�-----I--- -- -- ---------- ----- ---- ----- --- --'_---- -- ---- --- ----------5�0-- � - -- -% - �, �---- �m __axoo _ _____�____________________ _____�____ _____F_______ a� . ____ ____ ____ax'ao.__ -----��--- _ ��'� � Legend _4000�_____ ___ ____ _ _____F__________ __ `� _ �z9o'�°__ _____ ___ ____ ____ ____ _____ ___ ___4000__ � Cilyof5}wkaneFireSen�ceArea ➢�� i �FireDisYnctl � g�w:.� '< sm� aa� 0 _eauo� ____ s p�r ___ 's°a.°f°`�,�', __ _ __ ____� "� ,�� _ �� a ___atW__ �;re ninncc s �g '� � a a� _ 0�;ren,nd�c9 smnoo-s � �s, _a.0 o �t �=e sr�nons aaoo -G, . - --- -- . _ i____ =3 = S S - �S;sa`_ __ Sh d � �CityofSpok �11 �BOimdar7 ,,.D�r'r�"`�h+(CCH) � °� N� �ep T m � - - AddressC'd 1�90� ___ _ ___ __ �'� . 16,00_.. �Otl�er Mwudpalilies ' UrbanGro�i�ihArea SOO I � � � � __ _ ""ye89U.__ I�weter Bodies .. .. ao @ - �y u a�� Green�cre�m��..a s _p Sat _ .D __ �� _ _ ' Svtioo-b - i Srzt ov]o £ _ m e z� ' Slre ler� � �aw i �k s c� � sw � _ fl00 � _ s � �ew _ _ 89Q! � � g � 9wS�' �i ._1 �� 6 4vn . a ta�+ oo�� 8� - i 3 i a � ia� �o `� � � ; � aw i = � ia�n i = _1600 1s ° . ' . 3°' - s�n 5 a S . � '.. ' ___ . �__ C�� _` __ . ...._1600__ �� i �1--' � - --- _2�00 ---- ---- ---- ---------- ---- ------ ------ ------------Z�o-- - - ' Maplocation _2900__________ ___ ___ ___ _________ 6�Satlov� ' _" '__ `____'__,__ ____ _________"3LW__ � ---- - - `%�„� - ' � mm ' ;}' i Effecti��eDate:YX/Y\/Y\lY _,N i Srzeov 85� OcdinanceNo.:AY-XXX £� _3100�__ $ �Z�) ____ __________ ____ __________ ____ ____4000_ � S�O�a� . ---------- ---- ----- ---- -----g m -- -- -- --- j�^alic�r� . _aaoo_�____ _____r____ _____'____ ____ s��m�sa ____`r_ _'_____ ____'_____ ____ __________1_____I____aaao-- I�_ € _ _ i __ 0 ' 0'S ' ' Ntiles _ '1' Is�Zhs info.manon sho�rnlon�hir mao u romyi(sdf.om various i i I � � rorac - b� � .P C�� k (aims � � 8 ��8 � 8 8 R 8 9 8 h .� fl� , d 8 5i s�90 e.v��i r� i�a r j _ . � N Zo confi.macoaan�ro zmct ehe C n�ofSpokane la!(m�,Commr�r,frt� _ YIQO__________ ________ _ __ _ _ _ - ^ �.I ____ ____ __ ___ ___ s�allo�s 1 ._j- Dawrovma�r Dav�'m,am,Di�non ofF(¢aninq,roD)Dzr-r000. o�svo�ecai�,cobNU,wn �, � � , � , � , � , , � � g 8 8 8 8 � 8 e. . . � 0 8 'i i � , � � e = e ., e a � � _6300;----"-----i----------i--- ----=;---- ----- ----- ---- ----- ---- ---------- ----------�---------- --------63Q0-- Y S P t � F r � Map 4 5 ; � Six- ear ewer rojec s ' + ' � � � ' -�°°+----+---- ----------+----- ----�--------- ---- ---------- ----- - - -------- ---.-+---- ----- ---- ----��°-- � ----; I _480��i-�--- -----�----'�---+---- ---- -----�---- ----- ------- �� r � r '---- ---- - ----480�-- �LI)'O( i 1 �� '\ � °a� w e�n nwi i Spokane� � a go ��° Legend _'4000"i_____ ____ _____' __ __ _____ ____ _____ ____ ____ ____ �_�__ __________ ____ ____ _____ ___'4000__ �Cih�ofSpokanel'alleyBOwdar�� q�,y;�'"�� i tirbanGrrni�lhArea _3200T____i_SyoAane ____ -_F.e�.ua.nK TOW�fl�'1OW00f1 _ _ ___ ____ �_�II________ __�i__nVe _ ° _ ____32,00'_ ____MUnidpelAress i � � i � I `� � I � _ �w� a � �WeteSBOdles _2100�__ _ _ ___ ___ _ ____ _ ___I_____ ____y__ �_'_ _ _ a�____ _ ___ ___ �__ _ ____1A00 i - ---- q ;290�; •T,�n --- �x� sa 90 0 � ��a�� Cih�o[Spokaoe�'alle��Sen'er,s a � sn °y�\9o� _ SiaYearCapitallmpro�'ementPlan _1600*_________ ° „�op �,r�op. D „�ooare--� m __ ___ __� �„�op - }�.'0__ i M p Clt Of ' ° �5�� °3 �� so\�m,.P ,,.,�M�«oo,�., Liberty �eve�c�r(zoot-zoio) M'°'°�� Lake� ��i � a� �v ' �� x.�ore ,90'�� se.�-ered _.xoo I ,=�,m___ °`� , , , , , , , __ �`.�o�_ ___ ao__ I w aa.�oae ea __ ,,' —mter�ertor9 O�ll,�� +� Collec[ors __0 II�s Q`�� ¢9� m w w �A m r m a.�.� % r w.a�,0�l�if"`°"°t�9e � _—_I_— ____Address Gnd MuuQ _ aw., mw., ,�e.a Mawa.a9ria �ana ya�w'ews� i w an. T_OS1� n�90�-�'��t�o�MR.a � . ownn o,�nn.a.a d SXellei �° i � LaAey � _.xoo m�„„„ E,�,,,.q.�� ___ ______ „�„„„.� .� ,.,�„„,,.� ____!�.___y�__ ____ „�„„,,.� ___.xan�• ss a � � ' • . _iwo � ., ---- --- ------ ,�,n,,., ,s,� ,s,�.,., � ,s,n,�., ---- - '- � ---I--�-iwo-- _i__ __ Ra __ '� � __ ' _2100_�_____ __________ ___-+ _•_______ _____ ___ awa.e �- �nn.e ___ ___ __ _______ ____2100_ g �"" e _ Maplocation _2909�_______________ __________ _____Iii�-- �n maa. a _ _ _______�__ I_ •-_�-___ _____ ___3200__ � � EfPecti�-e Date:A\/�X/�XXA �" � . OcdinauceNo.:XA-A\l 'wRk„ ,� a e � _40Q0_ � � _3J00�__________ __________ _____ ____ ____ _____ ___�_____n __ _'__________ _______________ ______________ C��n� i i ��e • !sa�� ' � . I� j�d��Cy _4400}____�_____ __________ __________ _ awn.��____ ____ _ __l__________ '_______________�__________ _____4400 J � 0 OS 1 2Miles ;_ • I _ - o��a�zna;f.�,�aaon�a��„o..a,um�m�_�o��tsaFom�.m,� i � � i . a� �- . � .z c� m �ra�mr 8 ,8 � e ' :zii 8 8 � � 8 8 �� a � . . . .f � - _5:/09y � n � � _ 5'IOQ esor hd�rda�mrt�ab(rvjorerrosaw � ou�zamnreix. __________ __________ _____________________ _ _ _ ______ _ __ ____ _________Y____ __________ _ _____ IoconNmaaraan�coneacttheCih�of5POlnneValley'.Commrmin� � - Dew(opmentDeyammen5 Divinon ofP(anrciizg,/�OAJ a�J_J000. �-�- � � � � � _. 1� ----------- — ; Map 7.1 � , — r; _ 2010 _ � � _____ � ��f a,��°�° DevelopmentActivity , , �, ,, �. a, � ,� , , , v _ �� ---- '� �� „�d �. ,�!'' '. �.� - °�� ,.�, � , ,�, , , , m � � , c«y�v_ , ___.-- � � ��o ��o_ , , �.__, � < . ��n . S�oliane � Legeud � � a . < , . a Permifs � e:..._� . .�f'� _ _ s T 9 . Commerual ��ta r� '. l/�i.�f ,q• RjM� � � - * Re�de�ti� speaan�n��. �a�,r Tvwn of VLIIivo%d ��-- r"" • o `a � � � — / �'1 i/�/�' �^ :9 �°F * - OPIatsRuoNed /�� f� x — c� ^'��.\\ PI ��Prelim .A mval oq _ � � �/o� ��B oa� __ PI &BSPAPdicazims � � � � � ��c � LebavGrm�tABowdan s�� w a `�"��_.,,�""�." -. "�� a s' a oesrow��au� � r�� ,.. � ��g City of 0 ' .. . `� � ��r� � '� . e � ` ,k � Liberh '; �,om �a oe��e� ;d m _ �� v � "' �n� s- ,� � Lake `�� Ae_...�' �� . _ . 3�� y.,, • ° ao z000gcnao�. � 'in' � G.� r F A5� g f"" �� a�� .r m Rwa..a a�a - :� "° .,.�� J � �' „� � -n I � Y . NCT MF-2 � y � � = i � • Ydl � � � ' `�,s-�r. � �, �=e� ��-�aM�, `° w k �'U �.. 5 , �� Mun �co rR . m a... [ �� e h4^ �a , e�` Ar, � f. ieft" �f -GCC �O $ 0-0SPw �N .. � � d"°`;r a . e J 'q - - q � � . og�� b `'.. , ' _.-ey,— � i f I�a s„.�y � �r � GCA �CMU s � �.a s��. � . �� * /3 -, k ��.� fl, • L'k` I �3" � M1 �CC MUC a � .�s � s �. �W�4 �� '� � wF�*� � �� '� em "' ' CB NC 3 &. 9 1 ° i a 5 ise:_. � � '6 �" ....�R-1 C �sw ' 3 a @ �M � y wm� .�e a W.� '"°` st.� �.f � $� i..�� s�3�e a „9f m§ .� � R-2 -RC L� � �i Y ""'' � � �m. �ewmri' .a S . g :� z �" � �°�Y "�,: � 7 y � � g €�$ a �Py �g R'3 ��'� . -- ,-- '�. � a 'r � '� ��'�� .� �', �;'� ''� q�.'y:y e � - .�R-a �i-z � � ^ �. � , i � g , m a .._... �__� ,�.� � 8 � � . d � '°9, . � �.� � '�s �im.� � ' � ...�� '��„�`" MF-� wos � ..,h , � i . .a�,� �-° ��, � .� �I'" r--, ��-�. m s �' � � '_"' Ma Locariai ��3 ,s. ��uH.e. .w? P �n ..e.7 �p . fr---= w �i.-. _., ' .�a; �� , . � hi tl3� � ---- '----- � �� n Etre�menare�xs��a�xx b� � C I � Ordivanceho:XXYXl � / ' � a n� � S"p"okane�"°' �� , �— `�� a ; jUalley : � _ «�3 a ;y a'°�y -----�� o os i ��t� �""5�:�� •- I ��.�� . , . i ,J!Y�v r . 4� , � .n sn� . �� .r c � � . , . " ' c . . a�f a - �srh¢ ia�m(�ab�Gn�fm� aredom . Iocozfrm cetheCnofSpo.�zel 11�C � � - a¢raoa'rorm unin� �'� �y �� , Dewiopmenf Depvn eit D-vir on ofP/amm�g 09/ ._._ .� ' � . __. . . . _'Z I000. m�o,aw � �.�- �m� ,�, �. � x ` s� �' �� Ma 8.3 �a� ; � „ ' �� A . . . • � M,o�v, s ; a G is i i e a i a , oas . s � ��" �� s _ �, _ . Y - � � v . - ° • - � � �� r� q �� n� � �. `�` � �,..`. ;a'�,. e'. ``1 -�a $R � "°a�o 3 y � Legend �"`� ,,,�w LIlt _ � CityofSpokaneValleyBO�ndary Syokai�e.Ri��er P�' _ - - � � G7iffs/Bl�fis � v�� °�y.• �0.7uteTailedDcer e��r` � - �a3uM�� m y � � '� �Mm� '� E1kHabitat £ U�banNazuralOpenSpace a - a� —Ripenen Zone B ' _ - � � '�Wetefrnal � ° �_ � _ o�g a o�� '�� >�U�banOro�athArea 3 � '�� "'r� '"`� �R'ataBOdies � � eneuey' '"�� DA-RS[reamType �'°�' �� - L°� �(S)Designated 9horel'v�e � �� (�FishHetntffi � G� � �}y � `� �.a� i �a y w y5% T/-=� � _._ (h)Non fisL Hebitet � �`� � � � � �s� �� -M un�o«n �'' ,m a�` �.,. .� �'��{ '`�� ,�,m� �� ti � �g f- {�� _ � m � � :' } � .�.�� f�� [re� , `... '...' Y�• MapLocation , � {�� '° '` ,_ —� - .� �{��.� �� ; � ' � � ��{ � ,�� Eee�r�.ena�e�sxnxrcxii s � ,;Pa ��L�'�� ' � �� aaf��, ` � �n�oao�eso.ii ai. . �f � f fx{� 4� a ��I • � 3 w O Y u _ � � r{�� {r3 - � � � �f �a � / 3., �' � _,. a0 g � _ �a � ,��°"�e��, — � �� „f� °'�a� �� . , ; ��, �� o- �l' a�� f j I �f�� '��$?��$�x�'� �� .� � a"A �� ;� � �� o os � �,,s I�%m e�f��"5"r�rf�f .�� `.�.�r"A9f .��..��f�� f� 4r � }' I�.:r .f . .r;t m, . rr xx� i� f a �� .n c � .m rmr " I� �e.�9' ��r.r r• ��x,��. �� ,{�-.F ^�� Fv 55 g6�� Ae� 1�� . �l ff�l '� �d�f�� ' � tll ,� � I d (�� b f � f d ��I I �.��_—. , � ex�' .f f��".�:f��f��-f�� I ,` � {�� f� ��I �� C��S � l9(! C,iao.5 s� _�, {�._. � � i � ,�^ m e.,a,�s__„� i--- ---� -------------- ----—-- ,- -� - i ———— ---z643 -----�,_� ------�-- ti�� z644 �� - - - - - - - �6�--- �--.T Map 8.4 , ,s ___�� ,� � 3 � � 36 -'� 31 �' 32 ° FEMA Flood Hazards � av„ , oo �� c w, � ew,� � � o� , . - 3 �as ; �q , � , � � � � ��- � . . � � --------- °�----J—— w��<<,�--- ------------- ------- - - ------ , 6 � E, , , ,- - E�> ---�s,�,-,---------- -- ------ E — �,t�.oe � ' � ' ''_ � Spokane � ; ""� vo ' 3 p2 � � '� 2 3 O6 � � � � s Legend ! i I c m S � 'I �Amesof100-yearflooding S-kai�eRire. -- � neae 2- m __ _ I _ _ __ _ __ _______ __ _____ Town-ofryillwood I ¢, '�/�<�treesofsoo-yearfloodine � � i ' a � i _ � �Q � � aT � z o ��a �City ofSpokeneValley 9 I� - �Other Municipalitles � ___ Ci[-y0� iU�banGrrniRhArea � ��- ��I�� I�: Liberl� ---'wa�a aomes � � Lake, I� � �� s� �s � � � �� - - - - - - -m� �] �� o�� m�i - �I - . � � � -� SXtIIev �� - � �� Lake l I� -.�_. �r�� 9� I�� a y � � � � �� i � �� i ' i , a � � � � � I � a . , � y -"�'--- � --- - � -- - ai�---------�- 'i �---- ��--!- �.��'2� '° zs-_i f�to� ��Y � s „oso �� I e�l g,� � � ""'� �'` , �. -� �� I � , � �� a °� �� Map Locanon -m � __ _ _i___ � "^" � � �� F�� __�_ i�_____________ _ _ _ , �� ; �I { � ` ' / )'%/,�j � `'�I� � � 'r��✓� � �i, Eer�meua�e:asn��isa yxw� 3 ', 31 3� 35 � �3 Ij� 32 OcdinauceNo.:Y\-YXA 3 p.-� �� I 9 e�� , � v � � �� .� s� �' �✓ �I � .S�j��Il�e�' �p 4� � � � � , � i , � ' Y- m � < — � aa� ' ' j�► , . � i � �o -- ---- ----— °i — mp— � -- I_._ i , — --- �-- � . -- —— �- --—— I � � : � 4 y � � � , o o s � �,_ i . � ____ �f i � i i i � � m�r �� m � �m z� i ,� i �: � r �r .i �� f m - �a i � ' a � � i o � � � �� a �.- .�� .r c. .� ��mmr �N2443 � � #� i � � � ��—t 2445 � a��ao�.�ena �o.�,�.�„ 3.� s ana � B o , I -�(� � , � � � m � eeoresrhdirc!mmrliabiG�vforervo.rmzdomisrionsiniescontaner. I ZocorfirmaauranronmcrxheCinoj5yolmneVallav�,Commr�nirv ,�Q I � i I� � Dew(oymemDepmemem,Dioision ofPlaming,rQ)1^I-Z000. 56 tl m � I a aa` I P.� m I 0 � 0 [Aerer I I � �o s e. _ �e � I . s I xwee ___�____' _ _ _ _ _ _ __ n(5vvla a p ____ ___ _______________.�. . _ _ _ _ _ ________ ____ _ _ ______ ___ ____________ _ _ _ _ ______ ______ _ {lf4'[]f pokane ��,�r 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106•Spokane Valley WA 99206 � 509.921.1000•Fax:509.921.1008•cityhall@spokanevalley.org � Memorandum To: Mayor and City Councilors From: John Carroll,Chair-Spokane Valley Planning Commission Date: February 24,2011 Re: Planning Commission Findings and Recommendation: CPA-01-11 through CPA-08-11 BACKGROUND The Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan includes an annual amendment cycle that runs from November 2nd to November 15Y of the following year. Applications received prior to November 15t are considered by the Planning Commission in late winter/early spring of the following year, with a decision by City Council in late spring/early summer. The Planning Commission reviewed the Comprehensive Plan Amendments (CPAs) and has provided the following findings and recommendations. City Council may choose to adopt the individual amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission, disapprove the amendments, or modify and adopt the proposal. If the Council chooses to modify a proposal, they must either conduct a public hearing or refer the proposal back to the Planning Commission for further consideration. All parts of the Comprehensive Plan can be amended during the annual cycle. The Community Development Department received two requests for site-specific Comprehensive Plan amendments for 2011. Sites approved for a Comprehensive Plan amendment will automatically receive a zoning designation consistent with the new land use designation. The 2011 Comprehensive Plan text amendments include amendments to five Comprehensive Plan Elements: Chapter 2- Land Use, Chapter 3—Transportation, Chapter 4—Capital Facilities and Public Services, Chapter 7—Economic Development, and Chapter 8—Natural Environment. The amendments may also entail minor changes to other elements referencing the proposed amendments. The Planning Commission's findings and recommendation on CPA-01-11 through CPA-08-11 are summarized below: FINDINGS 1. Notice for the proposed amendments was placed in the Spokane Valley News Herald on February 4, 2011 and each site was posted with a "Notice of Public Hearing" sign,with a description of the proposal. 2. Individual notice of the site-specific map amendment proposals were mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of each affected site. 3. Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA—RCW 43.21C) environmental checklists were required for each proposed comprehensive plan map and text amendment. 1of3 4. Staff reviewed the environmental checklists and a threshold determination was made for each comprehensive plan amendment. Optional Determinations of Non-significance (DNS)were issued for the requested comprehensive plan amendments on February 4, 2011. 5. The DNS's were published in the city's official newspaper on February 4, 2011 consistent with Spokane Valley Municipal Code,Title 21, Environmental Controls. 6. The Spokane Valley Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on February 24, 2011, to consider the proposed amendments. After hearing public testimony, the commission made recommendations on CPA-01-11 through CPA-08-11. RECOMMENDATION File No.: CPA-01-11 Description of proposal: Privately initiated, site specific comprehensive plan map amendment to change the designation on parcels 45321.0109, 45231.0210, 45231.0211, 45231.0212, 45231.0213, 45231.0214, 45231.0216, 45231.0218, 45231.0224 and 45231.0226 from Mixed Use Avenue to Neighborhood Center with a corresponding zoning change from Mixed Use Avenue (MUA) to Neighborhood Center (NCT). This proposal is considered a non-project action under RCW 43.21C. Proponent: Dwight Hume Location of Proposal: The subject properties are located on the southeast corner of Progress Road and Sprague Avenue; further located in the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 23, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County,Washington. PC Recommendation: Change to Neighborhood Center (NCT) and zone to Neighborhood Center (NCT) File No.: CPA-02-11 Description of Proposal: Privately initiated site specific comprehensive plan map amendment on parcel 45174.2102 from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential with a corresponding zoning change from Single Family Residential District (R-3) to Multifamily Medium Density Residential District (MF-1). This proposal is considered a non- project action under RCW 43.21C. Proponent: Ann Martin, Heylman Martin Architects Location of Proposal: The proposed site is located at 503 North Walnut Road;further located in the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 17,Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. PC Recommendation: Change to Medium Density Residential (MDR) and zone to Multifamily Medium Density Residential District (MF-1) File No.: CPA-03-11 Description of proposal: City initiated comprehensive plan amendment to remove the entire Sprague and Appleway Revitalization Plan (SARP) and associated zoning designations and return those areas to the City of Spokane Valley zoning in effect on October 15, 2009. Associated Comprehensive Plan and Development Code text Amendments necessary to remove all reference to the Subarea Plan are also considered. Proponent: City of Spokane Valley Location of Proposal: Generally,the plan area consists of approximately 1000 acres of properties lining along and located in between the Sprague Ave. and the Appleway Boulevard rights-of-way, and extending west from Interstate 90 to just east of Sullivan Road. The area generally lies between E. Main Ave./E Riverside Ave. to the north and E. 4t"Ave. to the south. PC Recommendation: No recommendation is provided. File No.: CPA-04-11 Description of proposal: Chapter 2 — Land Use: City initiated comprehensive plan amendments will update Table 2.1, Spokane Valley UGA Land Capacity Analysis, to reflect new population numbers within the City of Spokane Valley; will update Map 2.1, Land Use,to display land use designation changes approved through the 2011 amendment process. 2of3 Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendment Location: Text amendments to Chapter 2—Land Use will have citywide implications. PC Recommendation: Adopt amendments to Chapter 2—Land Use as proposed by staff. File No.: CPA-05-11 Chapter 3 — Transportation: City initiated comprehensive plan amendment will update Map 3.2, Bike and Pedestrian System, to display newly developed bike and pedestrian infrastructure. Amendment Location: Text amendments to Chapter 3—Transportation will have citywide implications. PC Recommendation: Adopt amendments to Chapter 3—Transportation as proposed by staff. File No.: CPA-06-11 Chapter 4—Capital Facilities and Public Services: City initiated comprehensive plan amendments will incorporate changes in the 6-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) into the Capital Facilities Plan to ensure consistency; will update special purpose district's and other city service provider's facility and service data;will add capital projects such as city hall, parks, and public works storage facility to be included for the use of REET funding; will update Maps 4.1, 4.2, and 4.5 to reflect the latest capital facilities and public services; will update the growth assumptions to reflect population allocation numbers approved by the Spokane County Board of Commissioners. Amendment Location: Text amendments to Chapter 4—Capital Facilities and Public Services will have citywide implications. PC Recommendation: Adopt amendments to Chapter 4—Capital Facilities and Public Services as proposed by staff. File No.: CPA-07-11 Chapter 7 — Economic Development: City initiated comprehensive plan amendment will update Map 7.1 to display new building permits and land use actions in the 2010 development cycle. Amendment Location: Text amendments to Chapter 7—Economic Development will have citywide implications. PC Recommendation: Adopt amendments to Chapter 7—Economic Development as proposed by staff. File No.: CPA-08-10 Chapter 8— Natural Environment: City initiated comprehensive plan amendment will update Map 8.3 to display the field inventory work done in conjunction with DNR to update stream typing in Spokane Valley. Amendment Location: Text amendments to Chapter 8—Natural Environment will have citywide implications. PC Recommendation: Adopt amendments to Chapter 8—Natural Environment as proposed by staff. ADOPTION OF FINDINGS: The planning commission is required to adopt findings of fact (Sections 17.80.140)when recommending changes to the comprehensive plan. Each staff report contains findings applicable to the particular request. At the conclusion of the hearing for the comprehensive amendments, the planning commission, by separate motion, adopted the findings of fact contained in the staff reports for CPA-01-11 through CPA-08-11. Approved this 24`" day of February, 2011 John Carroll, Chair City of Spokane Valley Planning Commission 3of3