The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 01-12-2012 �CITYok�..ne � Val�e � � Spokane Valley Planning Commission Agenda City Hall Council Chambers, 11707 E. Sprague Ave. January 12, 2012 6:00 p.m. L CALL TO ORDER IL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE IIL ROLL CALL A. Election of Officers IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: October 27, 2011, Dec. 08, 2011 VL PUBLIC COMMENT: On any subject that is not on the agenda VIL COMMISSION REPORTS VIIL ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS A. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1. DELIBERATIONS PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TITLE 22.70 LANDSCAPING AND FENCING REQUIREMENTS B. NEW BUSINESS: 1. STUDY SESSION PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TITLE 22.110 SIGN REGULATIONS X. FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER XL ADJOURNMENT COMMISSIONERS CITY STAFF BILL BATES JOHN HOHMAN,CD DIRECTOR 70HN G. CARROLL SCOTT KUHTA,PLANNING MGR,AICP RusTiN HaLL RoD HIGGINs STEVEN NEILL MARCIA SANDS DEANNA GRIFFITH,SECRETARY JOE STOY WWW.SPOKANEVALLEY.ORG City of Spokane Valley Planning Commission RULES OF PROCEDURE Updated 06-22-2006 Updated 02-09-2010 Updated 11-29-2011 We, the members of the Planning Commission of the City of Spokane Valley, State of Washington, pursuant to the City of Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 18.10, do hereby adopt and publish the following Rules of Procedure: ORGANIZATION AND RULES OF PROCEDURE 1. Name A. The "City of Spokane Valley Planning Commission,"hereinafter referred to as the "Commission" is an advisory body created by the City Council for purposes consistent with SVMC 1810. 2. Location A. The Commission offices shall be the City Hall of the City of Spokane Valley. 3. Officers Unless otherwise required by a vacancy in office, the Commission shall organize every year in accordance with SVMC 1810. A. Of�cers of the Commission shall be elected from its membership; the of�cers shall be Chair, Vice Chair, and other appropriate officers that the Commission may choose to approve and appoint by maj ority vote. B. Planning Commission members must ha�e served at least one full calendar year to be eligible to be elected as an Officer. B. The Chair shall preside over the Commission and exercise all powers incidental to the office, retaining however, the full right as a member of the Commission to propose motions, second motions and have a vote recorded on all matters of the Commission. C. The Vice-Chair shall, in the absence of the Chair from any meeting, perform all the duties incumbent upon the Chair, and retain the full right as a member of the Commission in the same manner as the Chair. 4. Secretary of the Commission A. The Director of the Department of Community Development or his/her designee shall serve as the Secretary to the Commission. B. The Secretary shall provide for a recording of all Commission meetings, including public hearings and shall ensure that summary minutes of all public hearings are prepared and filed in the public record. C. The Secretary will conduct and record a roll call of the Commission members at each meeting, public hearing and study session. Updated and Approved by Council 11-29-2011 Page 1 of 6 5. Election of Officers A. Officers shall be elected at the first regular meeting in January of each year, by majority vote of the membership of the Commission. Terms of office shall run from the first January meeting until December 31 or until a successor has been elected. No Commission member shall serve more than two full consecutive terms as Chair of the Commission. No member shall serve as Vice-Chair for more than two full consecutive terms. In the event that the Commission has no sitting Chair at the first regular meeting in January, the Vice-Chair will preside over the Commission until officers are elected. If at the first regular meeting in January,both the Chair and Vice-Chair are no longer Planning Commission members, the Planning Commission Secretary will preside over the meeting until Officers are elected. B. A vacancy in any office will be filled by a special election, to be held at a convenient time with a majority present. In the event that the office of Chair is vacated, the vice-chair shall serve in that capacity until the required special election is held. Any member of the Commission who has served for at least one full calendar year, is eligible to fill the vacancy. However, no member can hold two office positions. 6. Quorum A. A quorum shall consist of four members of the Commission and no action can be taken in the absence of a quorum except to adjourn the meeting to a subsequent date. A quorum must be present for public hearings and study sessions. 7. Voting A. The affirmative vote of a majority of those present shall be necessary for the adoption of any motion or other general matter. B. For the conduct of business dealing with matters which require adoption or changes to the City's Comprehensive Plan and the election of officers, at least four affirmative votes must be cast. Each member of the Commission is entitled to one vote but no pro�shall be allowed. C. No member may participate or vote on a matter unless the member has been in attendance at all public hearings regarding such matter or has listened to the taped recording of the public hearing and reviewed the written record of the matter in question. 8. Meetings A. There shall be at least one regular meeting each month with additional meetings scheduled as necessary. Regular meetings shall be scheduled on the 2nd and 4"' Thursdays of the month, commencing at 6:00 p.m. and ending not later than 9:00 p.m. Meeting ending time can be extended by a majority vote of the Commission. Meetings may be used for general planning matters, study sessions or public hearings as described below. 1. Meetin�s on General Plannin� Matters. General planning matters to be reviewed by the Commission will typically be preceded by a study session of the Commission to discuss the issues with Community Development Department staf£ Generally, no testimony from the public shall be taken at a study session. 2. Public Hearin� Meetin�. A public hearing is a meeting wherein general business and public hearing items, such as the Comprehensive Plan and development regulations are discussed and decided. 3. Scheduled meetings may be canceled or convened at other times if deemed necessary by the Chair or,in the absence of the Chair,by the Vice-Chair. Notice of cancellation shall be given Updated and Approved by Council 11-29-2011 Page 2 of 6 personally to Commission Members and to the public by posting a notice at Commission offices. 4. The recommended order of business for meetings is: a. Call to order by Chair. b. Pledge of Allegiance. c. Roll call by recording secretary. d. Approval of Agenda. e. Approval or amendment of minutes. f. Public Comment. g. Commission Members Report. h. Administrative Report. i. Commission Business. � i. Unfinished Business ii. New Business j. For the Good of the Order. '�'- k Adjournment. B. Planning Commission meetings shall be held in accordance with the requirements of the Open Meetings Act, RCW Chapter 4230. C. Special meetings and study sessions may be called: 1. By the request of the Chair, or,in the Chair's absence,by the Vice-Chair. 2. By the written request of three or more members of the Commission. 3. By agreed motion of the Commission. 9. Conduct of Hearings A. Actions for a Planning Commission Public Hearing. Prior to the start of the public hearing, the Chair may require that all persons wishing to be heard shall sign in with the Secretary, giving their names and addresses, the agenda item, and whether they wish to speak as proponent, opponent, or otherwise. Any person who fails to sign in shall not be permitted to speak until all those who signed in have done so. At any public hearing, persons who have signed in and wish to be heard shall be given an opportunity to be heard.. The Chair, subj ect to concurrence by the maj ority of the Commission, may establish time limits and otherwise control presentations. The Chair may change the order of speakers so that testimony is heard in the most logical groupings, (i.e., proponents, opponents, adjacent owners, vested interests, etc.) B. The Chair introduces the agenda item, opens the public hearing, and announces the following Rules of Order: 1. All comments by proponents, opponents, or the public shall be made from the speaker's rostrum, and any individual making comments shall first give his/her name and address. This is required because an official recorded transcript of the public hearing is being made. 2. It is not necessary to be a proponent or opponent in order to speak. Updated and Approved by Council 11-29-2011 Page 3 of 6 If you consider yourself neither a proponent nor opponent, please speak during the proponent portion and identify yourself as neither a proponent nor an opponent. 3. No comments shall be made from any other location, and anyone making "out of order" comments shall be subject to removal from the meeting. 4. Demonstrations, applause or other audience participation during or at the conclusion of anyone's presentation are prohibited. It is distracting to the Commission and persons te stifying. 5. These rules are intended to promote an orderly system of holding a public hearing, to give persons an opportunity to be heard and to ensure that individuals are not embarrassed by exercising their right of free speech. C. When the Commission conducts a hearing to which the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine applies, the Chair(or in the case of a potential violation by that individual, the Vice Chair) will ask if any Commission member knows of any reason which would require such member to excuse themselves pursuant to the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine. The form of the announcement is as follows: All Commission members should now give consideration as to whether they have: 1. A demonstrated bias or prejudice for or against any party to the proceedings; 2. A direct or indirect financial interest in the outcome of the proceeding; 3. A prejudgment of the issue prior to hearing the facts on the record, or 4. Had ex parte contact with any individual, excluding administrative staff, with regard to an issue prior to the hearing. Please refer to Section 15(B) for more specific information on how to proceed where there has been an ex parte communication. If any Commission member should answer in the affirmative, then the Commission members should state the reason for his/her answer so that the Chair may inquire of administration as to whether a violation of the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine e�sts. CONDUCTING THE PUBLIC HEARING a. The Chair announces the matter and opens the public hearing stating the date and time. b. The Chair allows staff to describe the matter under consideration and place matters in the public record. c. The Chair inquires as to whether Commissioners have any questions of staf£ If any Commission member has questions, the appropriate individual will be recalled. d. The Chair allows proponents, opponents and the public to offer testimony and evidence on the pending matter. The Chair may allow Commission members to ask questions of any person at the conclusion of their testimony. e. At the conclusion of the public testimony, the Chair asks staff if there is_any additional information, testimony or evidence to submit for the record. £ The Chair either closes or continues the public hearing. Additional testimony may not be requested or considered after the closing of the public hearing, unless the Chair declares the record open until a date certain for the purpose of receiving written testimony or materials. g. The Chair inquires if there is a motion by any Commission member. If a motion is made, it shall be in the form of an affirmative motion. Af�rmative motion are preferred to Updated and Approved by Council 11-29-2011 Page 4 of 6 prevent "approval by default" of a failed negative motion. Following the motion and its second, discussion occurs among Commission members. h. The Chair inquires if there is any further discussion by the Commission members. i. The Chair inquires if there are any final comments or recommendations from staff. j. The Chair inquires of the Commission members if they are ready for the question. k The Chair calls for the vote on the motion L The Chair may direct staff to prepare findings for approval. D. Pre-filing of testimony or evidence is encouraged and may be delivered to the Department of Community Development in advance of a hearing. 10. Agenda, Staff Reports and Minutes for Regular Meetings. A. Typically, a copy of the agenda for every regular meeting of the Planning Commission shall be sent to each member up to seven (7) days prior to the date of the meeting. B. If available, staff reports will be sent to Planning Commission members with the agenda. Agendas and staff reports will be made available to applicants and the public at the same time. ll. Minutes and Communications with the City Council. A Minutes of all meetings shall be kept and the complete files of proceedings and actions taken in connection therewith shall be considered the public record and filed with the City Clerk. The Secretary shall provide the Commission members with a set of minutes of the previous meeting. These minutes shall be considered for approval by the Commission at a regularly scheduled public meeting and upon approval shall become part of the of�cial record of action of the Commission. Minutes shall also be transmitted as correspondence to the City Council for general information. B The assigned City Council Liaison may attend meetings for the purposes of communications with the Council as set forth in the "CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY GOVERNANCE COORDINATION MANUAL." 12. Recording of Meetings Proceedings of all public hearings, meetings, study sessions and any special meetings shall be recorded and retained. 13. Code of Conduct A. Prohibited Acts. Members of the Commission are prohibited from: 1. Acting in a manner, which would result in neglect of duty, misfeasance or malfeasance in office. 2. Acting in a manner that intentionally disrupts Commission meetings. 3. Missing six (6) or more regularly scheduled meetings or study sessions in a 12-month period without such absence being excused by the Commission. 4. Using his or her position to secure special privileges or exemptions for himself, herself, or others. 5. Directly or indirectly giving or agreeing to receive compensation, gifts, rewards, or gratuities from any source, except the City of Spokane Valley, for a matter connected with or related to the services as a member of the Commission,unless otherwise provided by law. Updated and Approved by Council 11-29-2011 Page 5 of 6 6. Accepting employment or engaging in business or professional activities that he or she might reasonably expect would require or induce said member to disclose confidential information acquired by reason of inembership on the Commission. 7. Disclosing confidential information gained by reason of his or her membership on the Planning Commission or using such information for his or her personal gain or benefit. 14. Conflict of Interest A. Any Commission member having a direct or indirect interest in, or who would benefit from any matter, shall disclose this interest and shall, if deemed appropriate by that commissioner or required by law,refrain from participating or voting on the matter. 15. Appearance of Fairness A. The Commission shall adhere to the applicable requirements of the appearance of fairness doctrine, RCW Chapter 4236. B. During the pendency of any quasi judicial proceeding,no Commission member may engage in ex parte communications with proponents or opponents about a proposal involved in the pending proceeding,unless the Commission member: 1. places on the record the substance of such oral or written communications; and 2. provided that a public announcement of the content of the communication and of the parties' right to rebut the substance of the communication shall be made at each hearing where action is taken or considered on the subject. This does not prohibit correspondence between a citizen and Commission members if the correspondence is made part of the record, when it pertains to the subject matter of a quasi judicial proceeding. (RCW 4236.060) 16. Review of These Rules of Procedure The Planning Commission shall review these rules of procedure on the first anniversary of their adoption and the odd numbered years thereafter. Any amendments identified by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council for review and ratification. KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENT: That the undersigned Secretary of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission does hereby certify that upon review and majority vote the above and forgoing rules have been duly adopted by the members of said Commission. BY: Secretary of the Commission Date: Updated and Approved by Council 11-29-2011 Page 6 of 6 Spokane Valley Planning Commission DRAFT Minutes Council Chambers — City Hall, 11707 E. Sprague Ave. October 27, 2011 L CALL TO ORDER Chair Carroll called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. IL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance IIL ROLL CALL Commissioners Bates, Carroll, Mann, Neill, Sands, and Stoy were present. Commissioner Hall was absent. Staff attending the meeting: Scott Kuhta, Planner Manager; Mike Basinger, Senior Planner; Dean Grafos, Councilmember, Deanna Griffith, Administrative Assistant IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Commissioner Mann made a motion to approve the October 27, 2011 agenda as presented. This motion was passed unanimously. V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES There were no minutes to approve. VL PUBLIC COMMENT � `— There was no public comment. � � VIL COMMISSION REPORTS Commissioners Bates, Carroll, Stoy stated they had attended the Developers' Forum put on by the City that morning. VIIL ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS Planning Manager Kuhta reported the City Council had approved the Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan. Staff has received several Comprehensive Plan amendments and the deadline for submittal is November 1, 2011. Staff also shared a list of future proposed code text amendments coming forward. IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS A. Unfinished Business: There was no unfinished business. B. New Business: i. Public Hearing for CTA-04-11, Proposed text amendment to 19.60 Senior Planner Mike Basinger made a presentation to the Commissioners to cover a privately initiated text amendment to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) to add a Recycle Facilities to Section 19120 Permitted and Accessory Uses; add OS-26-11 Planning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 4 Supplemental Permitted Use Regulations to Sections 19.60.050 B; Community Commercial zoning district, 19.60.060 B; Regional Commercial zoning district, 19.060.080 B; Corridor Mixed Use zoning district; and add a definition to Appendix A. Chair Carroll opened the public hearing at 6:08 p.m. Senior Planner Basinger reviewed the proposed language to be added to the Supplemental Permitted Use Regulations and stated that the language had been modified slightly to respond to the Commissioners' concerns regarding all materials and equipment being stored indoors. Commissioners had questions regarding storage of non-recyclable materials and direct access to an arterial. The Chair invited anyone who wished to speak to come forward. Dwight Hume 9101 Mount View Lane: Mr. Hume stated he was representing a business owner who currently has this type of business and stated that the client has proven to Mr. Hume that the business can run, completely contained, inside a sound proof building. Mr Hume stated that he believes, as does the client, that this type of business could be conducted in a zone that is not an industrial zone. Mr. Hume stated that the client did listen to the concerns the Commission had regarding storing materials and equipment inside the building, hazardous material, which is covered in another part of the code, access issues from an arterial. Commissioners had questions wondering why another zoning district would be more beneficial than industrial zone. Mr. Hume responded that the business owner would like to own his own property, which he cannot do in the Industrial Park, he is currently located. There was concern regarding the truck traffic, Mr. Hume stated that the truck traffic was already on the road traveling to other businesses. Planning Manager Kuhta also discussed the screening of any refuse storage outside. Commissioners asked about adding language for hazardous materials. Mr. Basinger addressed this concern and discussed how it is covered in the code. Seeing no one else who wished to testify, the Chair closed the public hearing 6:41 p.m. Commissioner Neill made a motion to recommend approval of CTA-04-11 to the Ciry Council, which was seconded. Commissioner Neill spoke in favor of the motion and the need to entice more business to our city. Commissioner Stoy also spoke in favor of the motion but was concerned regarding the lack of design standards and big blank walls. Commissioner Bates spoke in favor of the motion and feels the city should be moving forward in a more progressive fashion, is concerned about people dropping off non-recyclable materials. Commissioner Mann spoke in favor of recycling being a business that will enhance quality of life. Commissioner Sands stated she was concerned that this business did not belong in the zones being proposed, more truck traffic in these zones, in favor of recycling. Commissioner Sands stated she is also concerned changing Sprague Ave to an industrial zone and that changing the code for one business has happened in the past and .then the business did not come into the city. Commissioner Carroll stated he was in favor of the motion but would like to suggest a couple of changes to it. Commissioner Carroll made a motion to amend the supplementallanguage submitted in � the original motion to stick the word `indoor' in line #4,remove the words `recyclable', OS-26-11 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 4 � and `including non-recyclable materials', from line `a',_remove the words `access to site is limited to an existing' and add the words `and direct access' to line `d', and add new line `e' all activities involving the handling of hazardous and/or dangerous materials must meet the requirements set forth in SVMC 21.40.060." See strike-though text below: 4. �ee�Recycling facilities�; provided that: a. All r��materials and equipment, ��-r�e��e�i^-�'�, must be contained indoors. b. All activities must meet the noise requirements of SVMC 7.05.040(L). c. When adjacent to an existing residential use or residential zone screening in SVMC 22.70.030(B) shall be required. d. Site must have ^��°�� *� �;*° ;� ';m;*°�' *� �„ °°;�*;„� frontage and direct access on an arterial or state highway. �e.All activities involvin� the handlin� of hazardous and/or dan�erous materials must meet the rec�uirements set forth in SVMC 21.40.060 This amendment to the motion was seconded. Commissioner Carroll stated he felt that this amendment helped define the issues he felt the Commission was discussing. Commissioner Sands wanted to remove the word arterial so that these types of facilities could not be placed along Sprague, however other Commissioners felt that would limit possible access to too few places. Vote on the motion to amend the original motion is In favor = 5, Opposed = l, amendment passes, with Commissioner Sands dissenting. The vote on the motion as it has been amended was In favor = 5, Opposed = 1 motion passes with Commissioner Sands dissenting. CTA-04-11 was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission as amended. ii. Informational Item: Planning Commission Rules of Procedure Planning Manager Kuhta presented to the Commissioners the Planning Commission Rules of Procedure (ROP) as an informational item only. According to the Commission is required to review the ROP in the odd numbered years to make sure they are up-to-date with current practices. Mr Kuhta explained that staff is suggesting a couple of minor changes at this time: In item 8, Meetings; changing Old business to Unfinished Business. This would reflect more current use of language from Roberts Rules of Order. Also, Item 9, Conduct of Hearings replacing k `The Secretary records a roll call vote', with "The Chair calls for the vote on the motion." The Planning Commission has never used this rule and it should be modified to something a bit more useful. Mr. Kuhta stated that staff is bringing this forward now so that the Commission members can review the ROP and make suggested changes, if they have any, at any meeting between now and the end of the year. OS-26-11 Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 4 Commissioner Sands made a motion to accept the changes as presented by staff to the Planning Commission ROP, which was seconded. Commissioner Bates had a question as to why the election of officers takes place in the 12th month instead of in the lst month. Staff discussed with Commissioners what the basis for this rule had been. Commissioner Bates made a motion to amended the original motion to change the date of election of officers from the "first regular meeting in the 12th month of each year." To "the first regular meeting in the first calendar month of each year." This motion was seconded. Vote on this amendment was In Favor -= 3, Opposed = 3, motion fails for a tie. Commissioners Carroll, Sands and Mann dissenting. The Chair called for the vote on the original motion was unanimous in favor of the motion. X. GOOD OF THE ORDER There was nothing for the good of the order. XL ADJOURNMENT The being no other business the meeting was adjourned at 7:14 p.m. SUBMITTED: APPROVED: � � Deanna Griffith, Secretary John G. Carroll, Chairperson � OS-26-11 Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 4 Spokane Valley Planning Commission DRAFT Minutes Council Chambers — City Hall, 11707 E. Sprague Ave. December 8, 2011 L CALL TO ORDER Chair Carroll called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m. IL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance IIL ROLL CALL Commissioners Bates, Carroll, Mann, Neill, Sands and Stoy were present. Commissioner Hall was absent. Staff attending the meeting: John Hohman, Community Development Director; Scott Kuhta, Planner Manager; Karen Kendall, Assistant Planner; Martin Palaniuk, Planning Technician; Cari Hinshaw, Office Assistant; Deanna Griffith, Administrative Assistant IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Commissioner Sands made a motion to approve the agenda as presented. This motion was passed unanimously. V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES There were no minutes to approve. VL PUBLIC COMMENT There was no public comment. VIL COMMISSION REPORTS The Commissioners had nothing to report VIIL ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS Planning Manager Kuhta reported the City Council had amended the Commission's Rules of Procedure. IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS A. Unfinished Business: Continued Public Hearing — CTA-04-ll Proposed amendments to Title 22, Landscaping and Fencing. Assistant Planner Karen Kendall gave a brief recap of the questions which the Commissioners had previously requested clarification on, which were maintenance of the street trees along the public right-of-way (ROW), they responsibility of the property except for a portion of Sprague and Appleway west of University and Appleway Blvd east of Tschirley. Tree staking was the other subject Commissioners had asked about and Ms. Kendall stated the best information she was able to find was supplied at the last meeting OS-26-11 Planning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 4 from the University of Colorado which stated that staking is supported however only for a short period of time to stabilize the tree while it matures. Ms Kendall stated staff had received comments from Avista regarding fencing around utility facilities which have barbed wire. Avista is requested an exemption for critical and essential utiliry facilities. Chair Carroll asked for anyone who wished to testify. Clyde Haase, 12202 E Thorpe Rd.: Mr Haase spoke in favor of the amendments. Mr. Haase commented on tree staking and that it can be accomplished in many ways but it is more important to monitor it and remove it so the tree does not get damaged as it grows. Mr Haase agreed that smaller projects could probably be done without the help of a landscape architect. However, he stated he felt that guidelines should be set up for staff so that they would be able to understand better what they are reviewing. Commissioners did ask Mr. Haase some questions about the staking, cabling and maintenance of street trees. Dwight Hume, 9101 N. Mt. View Lane: Mr Hume stated that he reviewed the landscaping chapter and felt that there were a few issues he thought should be addressed. Mr. Hume stated he was concerned about fences being on property lines if the property was a through lot, the fence would be blocking the front yard of the neighbor. Mr. Kuhta made a drawing on the white board to show an example to the Commissioners. Mr. Hume was concerned that a change to the clearview regulations might make issue with every residential driveway in the City. Mr. Hume felt that barbed wire should be allowed on top of the maximum height allowed for a fence to be. Why allow barbed wire in a residential zone? Mr Hume also asked about electric fences as opposed to electrified fences and invisible fences. Mr. Hume stated that landscaping a building in and existing parking lot in an industrial area was not necessary. Mr Hume felt that the landscaping point threshold should be higher than is currently being proposed. Mr. Hume stated that a sight obscuring fences were required between incompatible uses, but there is no definition for incompatible uses. Mr Kuhta explained to the Commissioners that some of the issues Mr. Hume had brought up were beyond the scope of the original public hearing notice and if the Commissioners wanted to look at them, those issues would have to be noticed, which they had not at this time. Seeing no one else that wished to testify on this issue, Chair Carroll closed the public hearing at 6:49 p.m. Commissioners discussed the comments from Avista regarding the use of barbed wire around electrical substations, tree staking, clearview discussion on driveways, having answers from the traffic engineer, electric fences and several other issues and needing more information for some subjects. • Trees o Staking, required or not, maintenance, ., o tree maintenance, o staff to provide a recommendation on requirement, o why only in parking island OS-26-11 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 4 • Fences o Fence height, with wire on top o Exempt utility companies from wire requirements o Other cities doing, o Uniform height of fences o Electric, electrified, and invisible fences • Clearview Triangles o Better understanding of issues o Clearview triangles in residential zones o Stacked lots o Request traffic engineer attend to answer questions • Landscaping Points o Reduce required points for an architect (to how many points) 0 500 sf to bring site into compliance, question if should be more, o When would an architect be required Commissioner Stoy made a motion, which passed 5 in favor with one abstention, to continue deliberations to January 12, 2012. B. New Business: Public Hearing for CTA-05-11, Proposed text amendment to Title 20, requirements for Boundary Line Adjustments Planning Tech Martin Palaniuk made a presentation to the Commissioners regarding the proposed language change to Title 20 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 20.80.030 (F) regarding the requirements for a record of survey for all Boundary Line Adjustments (BLA) . Mr Palaniuk explained that the proposed amendment would allow the Community Development Director discretion in requiring a record of survey for simple boundary line adjustments. The current code language requires a record of survey for all BLAs. Staff has determined that in less complicated situations a BLA can be accomplished without a record of survey. The Community Development Director would have the ability to wave the need for a record of survey when there would be two parcels or less, simple legal descriptions, no complicating easements or appurtenances, no owner disputes, or any setback issues. Chair Carroll opened the public hearing at 7:38 p.m. Anthony Lazanas, 10606 E Empire: Mr. Lazanas thanked staff for the work on this amendment and spoke in favor of this amendment. Chuck Simpson, 909 N Argonne Rd: Mr Simpson stated he was a licensed surveyor in the State of Washington and was speaking in support of the proposed amendment. Mr. Simpson shared several examples where a record of survey would not have been necessary in order to complete the BLA. Seeing no one else who wished to testify the chairman closed the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. The Commissioners deliberated and asked Mr. Palaniuk to explain the basic process of the BLA. Discussion surrounded when drawings would not be required, how counter staff OS-26-11 Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 4 would determine when a to defer the BLA to the director, how much time could be saved, and that our consultant reviews all legal descriptions and surveys turned into the City. Commissioner Sands made a motion to recommend approval of CTA-OS-11 to the City Council. This motion was approved unanimously. After review Commissioner Bates made a motion to approve the findings as presented. This motion was approved unanimously. X. GOOD OF THE ORDER Commissioners and staff thanked Commissioner Joe Mann for his years of service to the City serving as a Planning Commissioner for the last three years. XL ADJOURNMENT The being no other business the meeting was adjourned at 7:52 p.m. SUBMITTED: APPROVED: Deanna Griffith, Secretary John G. Carroll, Chairperson OS-26-11 Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 4 CTA-03-11 RPCA CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Planning Commission Action Meeting Date: January 12, 2012 Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent �unfinished business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑information ❑ admin.report ❑ pending legislation FILE NUMBER: CTA-03-ll AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Continued deliberations — Code text amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: City initiated code text amendment modifying Chapter 22.70 (Fencing, Screening and Landscaping)in the Spokane Valley's Municipal Code (SVMC). GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 17.80150 and 19.30.040 PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: Planning Commission conducted a continued public hearing on December 8, 2011 from the initial public hearing held on November 11, 20ll and study session on September 22, 20ll. BACKGROUND: City Council has directed staff to proceed with modi�cations to the fencing and landscaping standards (Chapter 22.70) in the SVMC. On August 25, 20ll the Planning Commission was presented an overview of landscaping standards and outlined proposed changes. A. Specifics related to study session held on September 22,2011: 1. The following amendments were presented; a. Section 22.70.020(B) —Allow fences to be placed on the property line in a flanking yard (corner lot) outside of the front yard setback. b. Section 22.70.020(C) —Modify language to provide more clarity to the clearview triangle definition and update references to tables and diagrams to ensure this section is administered correctly. c. Section 22.70.020(F)—Define which zones allow barbed, concertina or razor wire. d. Section 22.70.040(E)(9) and Table 22.70-4 — Consolidate all landscape point calculation requirements into Table 22.70-4. e. Section 22.70.040(�(4) — Remove landscape requirement for new signs in developed areas. £ Section 22.70.040(L)(1)(e) — Add additional flexibility to landscaping requirements for industrial zoned properties. g. Section 22.70.040(N) — Provide a landscape point threshold for requiring a landscape architect to prepare a landscape plan and clarifying who will certify the installed landscaping at time of completion. 2. The Planning Commission requested the following items to be modified concerning the proposed code text amendment. a. Update clearview triangle diagrams to show consistency with requirement. b. Add requirement to barbed wire standards to state; "...not allowed in mi�ed use and commercial zones adjacent to public right-of-way". Current regulations only restrict similar fencing in mixed use zones adjacent to the public right-of-way. c. Clarify language in Section 22.70.0404(L)(1)(e),modi�cations. RPCA Continued Public Hearing for CTA-03-11 1 of 4 d. Increase the point threshold to require a landscape architect for plan preparation. The amendment is intended to add a threshold for smaller projects to be exempt from having a registered landscape architect prepare a landscape plan. Discussion from the Commission concluded 50 landscape points may be too small of a threshold number. A threshold of 1001andscape points is being presented. 3. The Planning Commission inquired about additional items not presented as proposed amendments during the study session. Findings below. a. Why do barbed, concertina or razor wire fences over six (6) feet in height require a building permit? The City adopted the 2009 International Building Code (IBC) which is the governing regulations for building permit requirements. Section 105.22 of the IBC states Fences not over 6 feet (1829mm) high" are exempt from permit requirements. The SVMC allows fences up to eight (8) feet in height, but any fence over six (6) feet tall requires a building permit. b. Tree staking - Section 22.70.030(G)(5)(�: The City's Municipal Code Section 22.70.030(G)(5)(� requires tree staking in parking areas only for a duration of 12 months. The City of Liberty Lake and Spokane County require tree staking. Concerns of tree staking are focused on improper installation, staking too tight and not being removed after the tree has developed its root system. The benefits of staking are protection from human activities, high winds and allowing an unstable or immature tree trunk to mature for a minimum of one growing season. Comments from Commissioner Steven Neill are included in Exhibit 3 of the staff report. c. Screening of loading docks - Section 22.70.030(�: Loading docks are screened to preserve aesthetic views from the public right-of-way from large trucks, storage areas and materials associated with large scale retail, service, manufacturing, storage, warehousing, hoteUmotel and industrial uses. At a minimum these uses are greater than 10,000 gross square feet of building area to require one loading bay. Newly developed sites are designed to allow for truck circulation as well as provide screening when necessary. Challenges that arise with existing sites may use the landscape modification section 22.70.030(L)to request a deviation to screening. B. Specifics related to public hearing held on November 11,2011: 1. Proposed code text amendment was presented with one addition by Development Engineering to Section 22.70.020(C)(1) stating; "Clearview triangles for new development and new commercial driveway approaches shall be calculated using the methods presented in SVMC 22.130.040 Street Standards." 2. Thomas Pratt, Thomas Pratt Designs and Clyde Haase, Haase Landscaping, commented at the public hearing. 3. The Planning Commission requested additional information on the following items, however none are proposed as current code text amendments. a. Maintenance of trees in public right-of-way; The responsibility of all maintenance within public right-of-way falls on the property owner pursuant to Section 1021 of the 2009 Street Standards. The City maintains trees within the right-of-way on Sprague Avenue between University Road and Thierman Road and along Appleway Avenue between Tschirley Road and Liberty Lake City Limits through a maintenance contract. The contract includes assistance from an arborist when providing maintenance of street trees and preserving clear sight triangles throughout the City. b. Tree stabilization and different types of tree staking; RPCA Continued Public Hearing for CTA-03-ll 2 of 4 Two methods of staking include above and underground. Attachment B is a document by Colorado State University providing guidance and visual representation on tree staking and stabilization methods. The City's code requires and shows a diagram of above ground staking. Staff confirmed with the City of Spokane's Urban Forestry Department, tree staking is not required and potential staking is determined at the time of planting with consultation from the City's arborist on site. C. Specifics related to continued public hearing held on December 8,2011: 1. Proposed code text amendment was presented with public comment from Avista Utilities relating to Section 22.70.020(F) requesting consideration for utility companies to be given more flexibility with amount and height of barbed wire used for screening and protecting their facilities. Findings below. 2. Clyde Haase, Haase Landscaping and Dwight Hume commented at the public hearing. 3. The Planning Commission deliberated and requested additional information, clarification and changes to proposed code text amendments. The four topics consist of clearview triangle, barbed wire, landscape points and tree staking sections. a. Clearview Triangle; i. A "driveway" as referenced in the clearview triangle definition can be a two-way stop controlled intersection (figure 22.70-3) including alleys and commercial driveways or a noncommercial driveway (figure 22.70-5) serving three (3) or more residences. The clearview triangle does not apply to individual residential driveways. The definition is reworded for clarity and consistency with four of the existing clearview triangles and �gures (uncontrolled intersection, two-way stop controlled intersection, yield-controlled intersection and noncommercial driveway)to protect the line of sight for vehicular,bicycle and pedestrian traffic. b. Barbed Wire; i. Avista Utilities submitted comments requesting to exempt critical and essential public facilities, such as a substation from Section 22.70.020.F. It is recommended to maintain proposed language and add the following to provide relief of community facilities for special circumstances. Proposed addition stating; `An administrative determination may be made by the Director for utility companies seeking relief fi^om barbed wire requirements." ii. Reference the comparison table below for local jurisdiction's barbed wire fencing regulations. Among the four Cities, Spokane Valley is the only jurisdiction to allow concertina and razor wire. Our current regulations are consistent with Spokane County's requirement of barbed wire only on the top quarter ('/4) of the fence. The top quarter('/4) of a six(6) foot fence is two (2) feet, similar to stating three (3) strands on top of a six(6) foot fence such as the City of Spokane. Section 22.70.020.F is proposed to be modified removing references to concertina and razor wire and only allow barbed wire consistent with adjacent jurisdictions. RPCA Continued Public Hearing for CTA-03-ll 3 of 4 City of City of City of Spokane County Spokane Valley Spokane Liberty Lake Propose to be allowed Not allowed Not Allowed in regional in commercial, mi�ed except in allowed. commercial and Barbed use and industrial zone certain industrial zones, only on Wire on top '/offence. Not commercial and top '/4 of fence. May be Fencing adjacent to ROW in industrial zones used for utility or commercial and mi�ed with 3 strands institutional uses in other use zones. on top of 6 foot zones for health/safety fence. Fence purposes. must be 12 feet from curb line. iii. The code addresses electrical fencing. Issues and concerns have not been raised regarding this type of fencing. No changes or additions are proposed. c. Landscape Points; i. The intent of proposed code change is to provide relief to smaller developments in relation to landscaping. Recommendation to remove required landscaping, if development is less than 500 square feet as shown in Table 22.70-4 remains. ii. Propose to remove Section 22.70.030(G)(6) as it conflicts with recommendation in Table 22.70-4. iii. Propose to move Section 22.70.030(N) (Landscape Plan Requirements) directly below Table 22.70-4. d. Tree Staking; i. Section 22.70.030(G)(5)(�is proposed to be updated stating; `Each tree shall be planted a minimum of two feet away fi^om the outside of any permanent barrier of a landscaped area or edge of the parking area. Ti^ees �� be staked for a period of not � more than 12 months after planting,�" Changing the word "shall" to "may" allows more flexibility and does not require tree staking. Additionally, the wording is changed to provide clarity when staking should be removed. This change will benefit the property owner and allow them the flexibility to determine,if tree staking is necessary. ii. To provide for more options, Figure 22.70-14 has been added to show an underground tree staking method. OPTIONS: Planning Commission may recommend approval as presented; recommend approval of modi�ed proposal, recommend the proposal not be adopted, or forward no recommendation to City Council. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: The Planning Commission advance a recommendation to the City Council. STAFF CONTACT: Karen Kendall, Assistant Planner ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: Staff Report with exhibits RPCA Continued Public Hearing for CTA-03-ll 4 of 4 CTA-03-11 STAFF COD�VIUNTTYDEVELOPMENTDEPA REPORT � PLANNING DIVISION crr�oH STAFF REPORT TO THE S�]okane � j PLANNING COMMISSION ,►,►��Iv�a�l�� TA-o3-�� STAFF REPORT DATE:November 2, 20ll HEAx�1vG DATE A1vn LocAT�o1v: November 10, 2011, beginning at 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers, Valley Redwood Plaza Building, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 101, Spokane Valley, Washington 99206. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: City initiated, code text amendment modifying Chapter 22.70 (Fencing, Screening and Landscaping)in the Spokane Valley's Municipal Code (SVMC). This proposal is considered a non-project action under RCW 4321C. PxoPOSAL LocAT�o1v: The proposal affects the entire City of Spokane Valley, Washington. APPL�cANT: City of Spokane Valley APPROVAL CRITERIA: Title 17 (General Provisions) and Title 19 (Zoning) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Division recommends the Planning Commission approve the proposed code text amendment to the SVMC. STAFF PLANNER Karen Kendall, Assistant Planner, Community Development Department ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Draft Language of Chapter 22.70 Exhibit 2: Public Comments A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION City Council has directed staff to proceed with modi�cations to the fencing and landscaping standards (Chapter 22.70) in the SVMC. On August 25, 20ll the Planning Commission was presented an overview of landscaping standards and outlined proposed changes. The following amendments were presented at the September 22, 2011 study session before the Planning Commission. • Section 22.70.020.B —Allow fences to be placed on the property line in a flanking yard (corner lot) outside of the front yard setback. • Section 22.70.020.0 — Modify language to provide more clarity to the clear view triangle definition and update references to tables and diagrams to ensure this section is administered correctly. • Section 22.70.020.F—Define which zones allow barbed, concertina or razor wire. • Section 22.70.040.E.9 and Table 22.70-4 — Consolidate all landscape point calculation requirements into Table 22.70-4. • Section 22.70.040.J.4—Remove landscape requirement for new signs in developed areas. • Section 22.70.040.L.1.e — Add additional flexibility to landscaping requirements for industrial zoned properties. Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission CTA-03-11 • Section 22.70.040.N—Provide a landscape point threshold for requiring a landscape architect to prepare a landscape plan and clarifying who will certify the installed landscaping at time of completion. The following table compares surrounding jurisdiction's requirements relating to the proposed code text amendment for fencing and landscaping. The City calculates required landscaping separate from the comparing jurisdictions. Some of the code changes cannot be compared. City of City of Spokane City of Spokane County Spokane Valley Liberty Lake Flanking Yards Propose fence Must meet Must meet Must meet flanking along property line flanking yard flanking yard yard setback. on flanking side setback. setback. yard. Barbed Wire Propose to be Not allowed Not allowed. Allowed in regional Fencing allowed in except in certain commercial and commercial, mi�ed commercial and industrial zones, use and industrial industrial zones only on top'/4 of zone on top '/of with 3 strands on fence. May be used fence. Not top of 6 foot fence. for utility or adjacent to ROW Fence must be 12 institutional uses in in commercial and feet from curb other zones for mi�ed use zones. line. health/safety purposes. Landscaping Proposal to not Landscaping not Requires Requires and Signs require required. landscaping. landscaping. landscaping for new signs on a developed site. Landscaping Remove landscape Yes,but not Yes,but not Yes,but not directly Flexibility for requirementfor directly related to directly related to industrial Industrial Lots new signs on a industrial related to properties. developed site. properties. industrial properties. Landscape Propose exemption Requires Architect Requires No Architect Architect to landscaping w/out exception. Architect required. requirements made w/out with Director's exception. approval. 1. APPLICATION PROCESSING Chapter 17.80 Permit Processing Procedures in the SVMC. The following summarizes key application procedures for the proposal. Page 2 of 4 Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission CTA-03-11 Application Initiated: September 1, 2011 Issuance of an Optional Determination of Non-Signi�cance September 30, 2011 (DNS): Date of Published Notice of Public Hearing: October 28, 2011 Date of Mailed Notice of Public Hearing: October 26, 2011 B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA 1. Findings: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the SVMC, the lead agency has determined that this proposal does not have a probable signi�cant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 4321C.030(2)(c). The Planning Division issued a Determination of Non-Signi�cance (DNS) on September 30, 20ll for the proposal. This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist on file with the lead agency. 2. Conclusion(s): The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) and Title 21 of the SVMC have been fulfilled by the applicant's submittal of the required SEPA Checklist, and the issuance of the City's threshold determination consisting of a DNS. No appeals were received. C. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE CODE TEXT AMENDMENT 1. Compliance with Title 17(General Provisions) of the Spokane Vallev Municipal Code a. Findings: Section 17.80.150(F) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) provides approval criteria that must be considered when the City amends the SVMC. The criteria are listed below along with staff comments. i. The proposed city initiated code text amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan; Staff Response: The City of Spokane T�alley has adopted goals and policies consistent with the Growth Management Act (GMA) and adopted County Wide Planning Policies (CWPP). The proposed text amendment is consistent with the GMA, CWPPs, and the City of Spokane T�alley's Comprehensive Plan. The code text amendment is consistent with the following goals and policies in the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan. • Policy LUP — 1.2: Protect residential areas fi^om impacts of adjacent non- residential uses and/or higher intensity uses through the development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations and joint planning. • Goal LUG—3: Ti^ansform various commercial business areas into vital, attractive, easily accessible mi�ed use areas that appeal to inventors, consumers and residents and enhance the community image and economic vitality. • Policy LUP — 4.5: Ensure compatibility between mixed-use developments and residential areas by regulation height, scale, setbacks and buffers. • Policy LUP—4.6: Develop community design guidelines to promote common open space,public art, and plazas in commercial and office developments. Page 3 of 4 Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission CTA-03-11 • Policy LUP—8.2:Integrate sidewalks, bike lanes, landscaping, and area lighting in office areas to provide a safe and attractive working environment. • Policy LUP — 10.2: Encourage a diverse array of industries to locate in Spokane T�alley. • Policy LUP — 11.3: Provide appropriate buffering, landscaping and other development standards for industrial areas. • LUP-14.1 requires the use of performance and community design standards to maintain neighborhood character, achieve a greater range of housing options, and to create attractive and desirable commercial and office developments. • Goal EDG-2: Encourage redevelopment of commercial/industrial properties within the City. ii. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment StaffResponse: The City initiated, code text amendment bears substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare and protection of the environment. The proposed amendment will provide clarity on clear view triangle standards, allow protection of commercial and industrial zoned properties through fencing requirements and expand options for providing landscaping associated with new development in the City of Spokane T�alley. The public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment are furthered by ensuring the SVMC implements local and regional policy. b. Conclusion(s): The proposed city initiated code text amendment to the SVMC is consistent with the approval criteria contained in the SVMC Section 17.80150(F). Page 4 of 4 CTA-03-11 EXHIBIT 1 Chapter 22.70 FENCING, SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING Sections: 22.70.010 Purpose and intent. 22.70.020 General provisions— Fencing. 22.70.030 Screening and buffering. 22.70.010 Purpose and intent. The use of fencing and screening reduces visual, noise and lighting impacts on adjacent properties and provides visual separation and physical buffers between land uses. It also serves to protect the health, safety and welfare of the community by eliminating dangerous conditions and preserving property values. (Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007). 22.70.020 General provisions— Fencing. A. No sight-obstructing fence more than 36 inches in height, nor any non-sight-obstructing fence (cyclone) more than 48 inches in height may be erected and/or maintained within the required front yard of any lot used for residential purposes. B. Any fence or wall, erected or placed behind the minimum required front yard setback line on a flankinq, side or rear yard may be erected or maintained to a maximum height of eight feet above the adjacent grade in residential zoning districts. Lots with double street frontage may have a fence constructed on the Iproperty line around the yard not used as the main point of access (the apparent�ask�a��rear vard). C. Neither residential, commercial or industrial fencing, nor any sight obstruction including vegetation, Iwhich constitutes a hazard to the traveling public shall be permitted on any sa�e�lot in any zone within the area designated as the "clearview triangle" as set forth below: 1. A clearview triangle is a measurement applied at the intersection of two streets1 or the intersection of an alley, private road or se�e�sfa-�driveway and a street to ensure unobstructed vision of motorists and pedestrians. Within the clearview triangle, the space between three and one-half feet and seven feet above the street, or three feet above the sidewalk, must be unobstructed and calculated as follows: I CTA-03-11 (Draft language for code text amendment) 1 Figure 22.70-1 Clearview Requirements Sr'EICi ETA7I�!M bYf'TH[N CLS PdiS?�W TRI.ir'YG1.S 7' . �.�,�_;,,,.� �, I+�4l�Ih�tP.[�+1 ,,°� ,�� j_�_�.. A�„�rt�lL�ITw1 [v�fs.�f �� ssr��s � Clearview trianqles for new development and new commercial drivewav approaches shall be calculated usinq the methods presented in SVMC 22.130.040 Street Standards. a. Uncontrolled Intersection. The right isosceles triangle having sides of 50 feet measure along the curb line of each intersecting local access street (or five feet from edge of pavement for a street with no curbs), °"°„ ^r^^mm°r^�°' �'r�"°,^,°„ (see Figure 22.70-2); or Figure 22.70-2 Uncontrolled Intersection I �n�°r. - � �--- ��. �srF�T� ' ��i�sr�7 �ou�e ___ __--�=��r =�-w,ax ,.� --�I r�---s._ _ , � F'fl�'ER17 LRfE 1 f � - � ' . �� . I i } , �J} � . a � � `�.r: p i; i �'+ �� ..{f,. � • . ,�� ' t� �w�o cx��, s r�� 'r u��rr�� .r � .�1 il � . �� _v� �� "��1�� {'�77��'� I CTA-03-11 (Draft language for code text amendment) 2 Figure 22.70-2 Uncontrolled Intersection soh soh Local Access Street Local Access Street� �CURB � CIN PROPERNLINE ROPERTYLINE RIGHT-OF-WAY w � � � Q N 0 z � z a a � � NOTE:If no curb is present, 0 o measure in 5 feet towards � � a a the property line from the edge of the roadway. �CURB� QN CIN RIGHT-OF-WAY RIGHT-OF-WAY b. Two-Way Stop Controlled Intersection. The right triangle having a 16-foot side measured along the curb line of a local access street (or five feet from edge of pavement for a street with no curbs), alley or commercial driveway, and the distance shown on Table 22.70-1 based on posted speed along the side along the curb line of the intersecting street (or five feet from edge of pavement for a street with no curbs) (see Figure 22.70-3); or F� ure 22.70-3 Two-Way Stop Controlled Intersection +�7+LN.F70E1- � .F 704t �.�;I - ,• .,�.. _ , . _ � . . . '� iFRYK,�I ApFFT TiiLNIFH ddIR�T= I �' � � . ..__ ..�-_e�s ' _" '._... _ _ _ � �� . . . ...- -�IYAAir-�1U�T __�� - A _ .''�� ± �-#R.�RJ7ITLI! -'& J� �� R ' y't_ _' ' ,V - � . 1 � .r.. �` _ ! ' i - �— - � .�' �• � � � �_.. ri+� r r�n ea��xA�€:��.x ro�.+rsa n�e , _._ �— �t •�o�r��€�n+E eacx c�n��nvr,�r .+ ,�1 F.a �. onrrld��wr�,r c�'r�it�r Aur I CTA-03-11 (Draft language for code text amendment) 3 Figure 22.70-3 Two-Way Stop Controlled Intersection � SThrouglh Streetl � � SThrouglh Streetl � CURB � � � Y � �' .iD. CIN ° RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPERTY Z LINE a � z a O z a o NOTE:If no curb is present, a measure in 5 feet towards the property line from the an LCURB J edge of the roadway. RIGHT-OF-WAY QN RIGHT-OF-WAY _ Table 22.70-1 �� — Two-Way Stop Controlled Intersection I Posted Speed (in MPH) Distance (in Feet) � I 25 70 I 30 95 I 35 110 c. In cases including, but not limited to, arterials with posted speeds in excess of 35 miles per hour, one-way streets, steep grades and sharp curves, the City traffic engineer will determine the appropriate measurement; or d. Yield-Controlled Intersection. For intersections of local streets with 25 mile per hour speed limits, the right triangle having a 35-foot side measured along the curb line or edge of pavement of the yield-controlled street, and an 80-foot side measured along the curb line or edge of pavement of the intersecting street. Triangles for yield-controlled intersections on collectors or arterials, or streets with speeds higher than 25 miles per hour, will be determined by the City traffic engineer (see Figure 22.70-4); or I CTA-03-11 (Draft language for code text amendment) 4 Fit� 22.70-4 Yield-Controlled Intersection K?. � Ao FT, ! �. 7Ft�U�QI� � � ��9�EET o �°� -_ . . , . . . . . . . ..._'�, f� . . . . . . _ � . �...�... _.:._'. : . . : . .. : . .�.f �. £. .. . .. _ — '.�11 I�YA flf�! . I 5 � � �� r u� _ _ �o ., ; , — .y,_ __�` � Y , .� . �i'� I Iv� , i i S �_ � -� 'Sk �I"�f�IT�[�F'N'A�Y CJ�'Y f1C�f-{3F-�%YAY Figure 22.70-4 Yield-Controlled Intersection � Through9treet � � Through9treet � NRB � � Y a m � � CIN � PROPERTY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE QN �CURB� RIGHT-OF-WAY CIN RIGHT-OF-WAY e. All-Wav Stop Controlled. The trianale determined bv the Citv traffic enaineer usina AASHTO siaht distance reauirements for all-wav stop controlled intersections: or f. Signal-Controlled Intersection. The triangle determined by the City traffic engineer using AASHTO sight distance requirements for signalized intersections; or g. Noncommercial Driveway Serving Three or More Residences. The right isosceles triangle having sides of 15 feet measured along the curb line of the street and the edge of the driveway (see Figure 22.70-5). I CTA-03-11 (Draft language for code text amendment) 5 Figure 22.70-5 Noncommercial Driveway ,��r. - �rr. _ '� • �� -��T ,. � f .:,a . . _ •., �.,. �, �.. T� .- ��IT Fh�F11-0F�WAT � . , � � f- ` ' w ' `�'R�'�'f L� 4� � 'f, , �-k j� \.. ..�:. _.. . _ ��} �{ _> ._ _ . i � M1� - � .k �'�,. . . �r .. '1 ��' � � . P �.. . 1t . x;�� i �-� �+�.. . � I .. � k �� . �1.� . . � 'C}� Figure 22.70-5 Noncommercial Driveway � St eet � � St eet � CURB � _ PROPERTYLINE � QN T 3 � RIGHT-OF-WAY i .'^. 0 � EDGEOF��EDGEOF DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY D. Exemptions. Clearview triangle regulations of this chapter shall not apply to: 1. Public utility poles; 2. Trees, so long as they are not planted in the form of a hedge and are trimmed to a height of at least seven feet above the street surface; 3. Properties where the natural ground contour penetrates the clearview triangle; and 4. Traffic control devices installed by the City. I CTA-03-11 (Draft language for code text amendment) 6 E. Fences in nonresidential, commercial, mixed use and industrial zoning districts shall not exceed eight feet in height. F. Barbed��wire may be used for security purposes in mixed use, commercial and industrial zoninq districts in the absence of a residential component only on the upper one-quarter of the fence� �.,,�„�+r,�� ,. ,�,�+r,,.+� garbed��r°, ^ °��^° ^ r wire shall not be permitted in any residential zoninq district (except for confininq animals, see Section 22.70.020.G and H)or in anv commercial and mixed use zoning district adjacent to any public right-of-way. An administrative determination mav be made bv the Director for communitv facilities seekinq relief from barbed wire requirements. G. In anv residential zoninq district, barbed wire fences mav be used to confine animals, if the parcel meets the requirements contained in Section 19.40.150. H. Electric fences may be used for the confinement of animals; provided, however, that: 1. The fence is marked with warning signs at least 24 square inches in area located every 150 feet; and 2. The electric fence is located not less than 24 inches from the property line; and 3. Access to the fence is limited by conventional fencing or enclosure. I#. A combination of sight-obscuring fences and landscaping shall be required between incompatible land uses as established in SVMC 22.70.030. J�. Fencing shall not block the view of fire protection equipment from approach. (Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007). 22.70.030 Screening and buffering. A. Applicability. The provisions of this section apply only to multifamily and nonresidential projects. B. Type I — Full Screening. 1. Where required for full screening, a sight-obscuring fence shall be installed consistent with the requirements for a clearview triangle. The fence shall be at least six feet high and 100 percent sight obscuring. Fences may be made of wood, ornamental iron or aluminum, brick, masonry, architectural panels, chain link with slats, or other permanent materials, berms, walls,vegetative plantings, or some combination of these. 2. The required fence shall be further screened by a mix of plantings located within a five-foot buffer strip that are layered and/or combined to obtain an immediate dense sight-obscuring barrier of two to three feet in height, selected to reach six feet in height at maturity as follows: I CTA-03-11 (Draft language for code text amendment) 7 a. A mixture of conifers and deciduous trees, planted at a distance of not less than 35 feet on center, with a maximum of 50 percent of the trees being deciduous; b. Evergreen shrubs shall comprise at least 75 percent of the plantings, planted at a distance of not less than six feet on center; c. A minimum of 24 points of landscaping shall be installed for every 25 linear feet of buffer area; d. Plantings used for full screening adjacent to public or private rights-of-way shall be located outside the fence or security system. Figure 22.70-6 Example of Type I Landscaping with Sight-Obscuring Fence (Not to Scale) Lve,greer,rr�.e �_J�«:i<uxxs; .. `;Fint:,, _� �?{°� ti ti} -,+�� •` ,�-��, �"' `� ..- �� '� L "� ��, '� J e c x�l� �,f'if� '�� '�� `��-�"�Y'i`°:�•�� ;��'� �'v�� #�� *T� ��,.. �' t 5 �1 � �- . . �� . �� ". :� _ . . � � �� ` a�~''.� �� '� :,"`'.�,� '�' �" ` �� - � �'ti.. }-`�+'r'�� k ff17i'< fl+llfl7 •�- � �..r � LJ Z • h�� t+-�F'3 €�v:1r�UT11Y�tS.`IY:4' 3. All trees and shrubs shall be planted and maintained in accordance with the standards of the IAmerican °°°^^�°+�^^ ^f "'��r°°r„m°^Standard for Nurserv Stock. All newly planted trees and shrubs shall be mulched and maintained to give a clean and weed-free appearance. � ,p '��a S' � J1}1� F. .� ' } . k_ k .. _'� � I��AN'I'IF{L�kl I?:'fL1Rl: �F.' �� II � � ;� ' r�. a-yr i,� '.r �� - - . 1�� ° } e#� ' � . . I I'I'.I1 I.*�'I'I�1:4H It U.�I I I'd]I-1�'_'4' �I(�I I`I'�i iH ti l'lil�i'I'IT�it�l 9:!�0:l�. Figure 22.70-7 Type I Full Screening C. Type II —Visual Buffering. 1. Where required to minimize the incompatibility between adjacent land uses, a visual screen of not less than five feet in width which may consist of fencing, architectural panels, berms, walls, vegetative plantings, or some combination of these shall be installed as follows: a. A mixture of conifers and deciduous trees, planted at a distance of not less than 35 feet on center, with a maximum of 75 percent of the trees being deciduous; I CTA-03-11 (Draft language for code text amendment) 8 b. Evergreen shrubs shall comprise at least 50 percent of the plantings; c. A minimum of 18 points of landscaping shall be installed for every 25 linear feet of buffer area. 2. All trees and shrubs shall be planted and maintained in accordance with the standards of the American o��,,,,,�+,,,., „f n�„r�or,,,,,o., �� ,. „f�.�hi..h ;� ., f,�o ;.,+ho n��.,.,;.,n �'°^°�i;Standard for Nurserv Stock. All newly planted trees and shrubs shall be mulched and maintained to give a clean and weed-free appearance. Figure 22.70-8 Example of Type II Landscaping Eveie�reen Tr�E D�cidu�us Shrubs � � �� , � �,� �, � � � � � � ��, 4 � '� ��--� �"� �� ' � - _ -� ' ,� ; , ��_ ��, �- �� . � _ � °��.. �mdf. T. C-�}i'c x � -�"`-�_ � �= `�-�`' ��`��-� .�� ' ��-- .,� #� �` �, � � �° � ��-� 3. The buffer shall run the entire length of the abutting lot line(s). A natural, undisturbed wooded area at least 20 feet in width may substitute for landscaping. D. Full screening and buffering are required for land use classification as shown on Table 22.70-2. I CTA-03-11 (Draft language for code text amendment) 9 Table 22.70-2 — Buffers Required by Type R-1, R-2, MF-1, NC, C, CMU, City Zoning Districts R-3, R-4 MF-2 O, GO RC MUC Center I-1, I-2 Planned Residential I I I I I I I Development IManufactured Home Parks I I I I I I I IMF-1, MF-2 I n/a I II II II I IO, GO I I n/a II n/a n/a n/a INC, C, RC I I II n/a n/a n/a n/a ICMU, MUC I I n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a In/a n/a n/a n/a n/a City Center I I I I-1, I-2 I I I I I I n/a I I —Type I Full Screening II —Type II Visual Buffering n/a —Not Applicable E. General Provisions— Landscaping. 1. Applicant may use any combination of planting materials to meet the requirements of this section. Points are assigned based on the following: Table 22.70-3 — Landscaping Point Values Minimum Size (at time of planting) Type of Plant Point Material Deciduous Trees Evergreen Trees Value (in caliper inches) (in feet of height) I8-inch or greater 22 ft. and over 26 I Large Tree 7-inch 19—21 ft. 24 I 6-inch 16— 18 ft. 22 I CTA-03-11 (Draft language for code text amendment) 10 Table 22.70-3 — Landscaping Point Values Minimum Size (at time of planting) Type of Plant Point Material Deciduous Trees Evergreen Trees Value (in caliper inches) (in feet of height) I 5-inch 13— 15 ft. 20 I 4-inch 11 — 12 ft. 18 I 3-inch 9— 10 ft. 15 I Medium Tree 2-inch 7—8 ft. 12 I Small Tree Single trunk: 1-inch 5—6 ft. 9 Ornamental Tree Multiple trunk (minimum 3 trunks): smallest 5—6 ft. 9 trunk 1-inch caliper I Large Shrub 5-gallon and 24-inch height at planting 3 I Medium Shrub 3-gallon and 12-inch height at planting 2 I Small Shrub 2-gallon and 8-inch height at planting 1 Ornamental 1 gallon 1/2 Grasses IGroundcover 1 gallon 1/2 I 4-inch pots 1/4 IExisting Trees Greater than 6-inch caliper 22—50 Landscaped Berm 30-inch height; 10-foot length; 3:1 slope 1 per 5 linear ft. Turf Grass n/a 1/4 per sq. yd. 2. Landscaping must equal or exceed a minimum number of points based on the size of the lot, parcel or tract and the number of parking spaces. Table 22.70-4 — Landscaping Points Required for Development,Additions or Site Alterations I CTA-03-11 (Draft language for code text amendment) 11 Size of Developed Number of Points Required A rea In_ yn�ft �i-��Rs °�Pn I 500—2,500 sq. ft. Site points =25 I 2,5018—5,000 sq. ft. Site points = 50 More than 5,000 sq. Site points = 50 plus one point for each 200 sq. ft. of area over ft. 5,000 sq. ft. Parking�e�s Two points per required parking space and one point for each proposed additional parking space 3. Landscapinq Plan Requirements. A landscapinq plan shall be prepared and sealed bv a reqistered landscape architect when proposal exceeds 100 landscape points. All landscape plans shall include the size and tvpe of landscapinq materials, the dimensions of the tract, and a point calculation showinq compliance with this provision. 4�. An additional 10 percent in the number of points shall be required adjacent to the following aesthetic corridors: a. State Route 27 from 16th Avenue South to 32nd Avenue and Mansfield Avenue to Trent Avenue; b. Appleway Boulevard (south side from Park Road to Dishman Mica Road); c. Mirabeau Parkway from Pines Road to Indiana Avenue; d. Dishman Mica Road from 8th Avenue, south to City limits; e. 32nd Avenue within the City limits; f. Appleway Avenue from Barker Road to Hodges Road. I54. Points for required full screening or visual buffers shall be in addition to the points required to meet landscaping requirements of this section. I6�. A maximum of 25 percent of required landscape points may be claimed within the street right-of-way. 7�. A minimum of 60 percent of points shall be used for landscaping in the front and side yards. 8�. A minimum of 25 percent of required points shall be used for evergreen plantings. I CTA-03-11 (Draft language for code text amendment) 12 I9�. A maximum of 25 percent of required points may be used for turf grass. (Turf located within the street right-of-way is excluded.) oholl r �c nf 9(1 r� in+c• onrJ 10. The type and location of vegetation shall not interfere with utilities and the safe and efficient flow of street traffic. Approval by the appropriate City departments responsible for street and utilities shall be required. 11. Any turf grass planted in the street right-of-way shall be excluded from turf point credits. 12. Street trees are included for point calculation. 13. All plant material planted to meet the minimum requirements of these regulations shall be in a healthy condition at the time of planting and shall meet quality standards set forth by the American Standard for Nursery Stock. 14. Turf grass shall be planted, seeded or re-seeded as necessary, watered and maintained in such a manner as to completely cover all exposed areas of soil after one full growing season. 15. No disturbed ground shall be left exposed. Grass and other approved and appropriate ground covers or mulch shall cover all nonpaved and nonbuilt developed areas. 16. Landscaping may be included within stormwater facilities, providing it does not impede on functionality and is consistent with stormwater guidelines. F. Street Trees. 1. Street trees shall include deciduous trees planted in or within 10 feet of any public or private right-of-way, planted at a distance of not less than 35 feet on center in sleeves designed to direct root development as shown in Figure 22.70-9 of this chapter. I CTA-03-11 (Draft language for code text amendment) 13 Figure 22.70-9 Root Barrier for Trees Planted Near Walkways � � 4.�-��" - I � ., r��,�x+��,.�c .�` � �; , �� . ��.......... �_�-� ��-��,�a _�* , . i{ . � �-�e . �• ..� �� ' � � ��.0. .r . ' w-'� ,� —�-�, �h1,..�+:7t�+/w��huFr.E F,�5C1T�A1e�9E ;�'.� I� ,, }-. t t1� } ?- r' ! . 1 1 l�.Cx�T �3�4F?�.I�R �C?R i�U4TiT4N� 71��C� MI�.4�' �lR��W�.Y'r'� __._ _,._�__�_._._ .. �-- —'" .. �S�Y 5S5 kC�+..66 2. If construction is adjacent to any local access, collector or arterial, at least one medium tree shall be planted for each 40 linear feet, or fraction thereof, for that portion of the development abutting the right-of-way. 3. Where overhead utility lines are present, use appropriate street tree species as specified in Appendix 22-A, Recommended Planting List, in subsection O of this section. G. Landscaping Requirements for Parking Areas. 1. Headlight Screening. Where parking lot design includes spaces which allow vehicles to park perpendicular to public rights-of-way or structures located on adjacent parcels, headlight screening shall be required. Headlight screening should not exceed 30 inches in height for the length of the parking area. ;aa'�e..�� f � � _ {+�k � r - -i �. �'�� `.,,.r+�PK:r{-� r.. .-��sr,�a Rr+ir�.r•w�Y Figure 22.70-10 Headlight Screening 2. When a parking area abuts residentially zoned property along any interior side or rear property line, Type I full screening is required. 3. A maximum of 10 percent of the number of required parking spaces may be replaced with landscaping. Ten points of landscaping shall be required for each substituted parking space. I CTA-03-11 (Draft language for code text amendment) 14 4. A minimum of 25 percent of required points for parking areas shall be evergreen plant materials. 5. Amount and Location. a. Each parking lot island and/or peninsula shall be a minimum of 130 square feet with a minimum average width of five feet; b. Each parking lot island and/or peninsula shall contain a minimum of one medium tree; c. The distance between any parking space and a landscaped area shall be no more than 75 feet; d. All parking lot planting areas shall be protected with concrete curbs, or equivalent barriers. Bumper blocks shall not be used for boundaries around the landscaped area; e. All landscaping must be located between parking stalls, at the end of parking columns, or between stalls and the property line. Landscaping which occurs between the parking lot and a building or recreation area shall not be considered as satisfaction of these requirements; f. Each tree shall be planted a minimum of two feet away from the outside of any permanent barrier of a landscaped area or edge of the parking area. Trees��m�be staked for a period of not-4e�ss more than 12 months after planting; g. Ground cover or grasses shall be planted to cover each parking lot planting area within three years from the date of issuance of the certificate of occupancy. All ground cover shall have a mature height of not more than 24 inches. Loose rock, gravel, decorative rock or stone, or mulch shall not exceed 20 percent of the planting area; h. Space devoted to required parking lot planting areas shall be in addition to any required front, side, and rear yard buffer requirements; i. Stand-alone parking lots shall require three points of landscaping for each parking space and shall be exempt from other landscaping requirements. 6�. Parking areas limited to commercial loading and truck maneuvering are limited to provision of street trees along public rights-of-way, planted at intervals no greater than 30 feet on center. I7�. Modifications to protect drainage features, easements, or facilities shall be allowed. I CTA-03-11 (Draft language for code text amendment) 15 8�. The requirements of this section shall not apply to parking garages or parking decks, or display areas for automotive and equipment sales and rentals. 9. Proposals requirinq ten (10) new parkinq stalls or less are exempt from landscapinq points found in Table 22.70-4. H. Landscaping Required for Common Open Space. 1. Fifty percent of the required common open area shall contain irrigated plantings. I. Screening of Loading Docks. Off-street loading spaces and apron space should be screened from view of the abutting streets for a minimum of 35 feet: 1. By a combination of permanent architectural and landscape elements such as walls, berms, trees and shrubs with a mature height of at least to the height of the top of the dock door but no greater than 12 feet above the truck dock apron; and 2. Shall, when viewed at a perpendicular angle from the street, screen the loading spaces completely, except for driveway opening(s). J. Landscaping Requirements for Freestanding Signs. 1. New freestanding sign structures serving a new development shall provide a landscaping area as follows: a. Structures on Slab. A landscape border of 18 inches or more measured from the edge of slab for monument signs. b. Single Pole Structures. A landscape border not less than 32 square feet in area located 18 inches or more measured from the edge of footing if flush with natural grade, or 18 inches from the pole, provided the footing is covered with not less than 18 inches of soil. c. Multiple Pole Structures. A landscape border not less than 60 square feet in area located 18 inches or more measured from the edge of footings. The landscape border may be placed adjacent to the poles provided footing is covered with not less than 18 inches of soil. 2. New freestanding sign structures located within 208 swales areas require no additional landscaping. Footings shall be installed in such a way that the biofiltration function of the swale is not diminished. 3. New freestanding sign structures located within existing developments where landscaping meets the requirements of subsection C of this section require no additional landscaping. I CTA-03-11 (Draft language for code text amendment) 16 4. New sign structures on a fully developed site �^��" r �� n++� „h�o,.+,,,n Ll r,f+hfo �o�+,,,n.are exempt from landscapinq. 5. Points for landscaping of sign structures may be used to meet the minimum requirements of this chapter. K. Xeriscaping. 1. The number of required points may be reduced by up to 20 percent for use of recommended xeriscape planting materials combined with decorative hardscape. Xeriscape planting materials need fewer waterings than typical lawn grasses and can tolerate, resist, or avoid drought after they are established. They have attractive ornamental features and are relatively easy to grow. Xeriscape planting materials have not been invasive in local growing conditions. 2. Use drip or trickle irrigation. 3. Mulch with three to four inches of shredded or ground bark, well-rotted compost, wood shavings or chips at the time of installation. L. Modification of Landscaping Requirement. 1. The director may approve alternative landscaping proposals where: a. Only a portion of the parcel is being developed; b. Landscaping would interfere with the adequate storage, conveyance, treatment or control of stormwater runoff or would interfere with the maintenance of stormwater facilities or natural drainage systems; c. Applicant proposes xeriscaping in conformance with subsection K of this section; d. Existing structures or improvements preclude installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems as prescribed herein. e. Additions or expansions on developed Industrial zoned properties mav be exempt from landscapinq requirements, where it is shown that the installation of landscapinq is not feasible. 2. Where applicant proposes to preserve existing healthy trees, a credit may be applied to points for required landscaping; provided, however, that not more than 25 percent of the total points may be located within the public right-of-way. Credit may be approved as follows: I CTA-03-11 (Draft language for code text amendment) 17 Table 22.70-5 —Credits for Tree Preservation Size of Preserved Deciduous Height of Existing Preserved Conifer Landscape Points Applied Tree* I 6-inch caliper 16— 18 ft. 25 I 7-inch caliper 19—21 ft. 28 I 8-inch to 10-inch caliper 22—28 ft. 30 I 10.1-inch caliper to 15-inch DBH 29—32 ft. 35 I 15.1-inch to 20-inch caliper 33—36 ft. 40 I 20.1-inch to 25-inch caliper 37—40 ft. 46 I Over 25-inch caliper >41 ft. 58 3. The decision of the director regarding modification of landscape requirements shall be final unless an aggrieved person appeals that decision to the hearing examiner. M. Installation, Maintenance, and Enforcement. 1. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, person(s)who prepared landscape plan � n;�+oro,� ��n,��,.�no �r,.h,+o,.+Will certify that the irrigation systems and landscaping have been installed in accordance with approved plans and specifications. 2. The director may authorize a delay where planting season conflicts would produce high probability of plant loss. In the event the director authorizes a delay, a limited access agreement, not to exceed six months, may be issued to complete the installation of required landscaping. Maintenance of landscaping shall be the responsibility of the property owner. All landscaping required by this chapter shall be permanently maintained in a healthy growing condition. Trees that become diseased, severely damaged or die shall be removed by the owner. All trees removed under this section shall be replaced in accordance with the approved landscaping plan for the property. Lack of maintenance shall constitute a violation of this code. a. Tree guards are to be used around the base of each tree in lawn areas. b. Trees are to be planted a minimum of four feet from any curb stop whenever possible. I CTA-03-11 (Draft language for code text amendment) 18 c. Landscaping must be maintained to allow fire protection equipment to be seen from approach. d. All landscaping must provide for a three-foot clear area around all fire protection equipment. Figure 22.70-11 Example of Suggested Shrub Planting � �� 7i�i�'��J��R'��1'� � � �` ��fi��al�,��l_� �.k,t �,�I1k.�H _ �� '�'�CN�E�1 PL�� . �A��:�T�1+1� �" p � ��}��h+�DVf +�t1� �� 1 I CTA-03-11 (Draft language for code text amendment) 19 Figure 22.70-12 Example of Suggested Deciduous Tree Planting � �� Pl�+l'(�C7 ThA.i T�}P�]F R�� d,+;.�.i I��4'�'�ti1�'il`1'fY+E � Pr►�+�'ri�3 uRA�� I' �Gli�t�i A��i'EE�fp �',� Mi�akt4}L7[] s7AFS.� �-; ;jT�kt`,i 5 �'�1° p�4'EH ih�IwG a�r�Pi�pV�:S. Ih�Cr'�N�Ca�+PE PRIO+� T�'e��I'I l��f+l� �F�J�+'�4�5�F��r�P,�+,�..T4E�a I C7�:�5 7�lC+C�S��"#�°C}��'IF',� �U_.�:�r ��'P��iT N _� — �;�� i SPE�IF�fi}PLAf+ffIKG M�i tnr,�t�R*`I'�1�' �� — F��C]l[�AI R�CrCK._� � �J _ i f " .. a ,x�41J,.�1�. , � I CTA-03-11 (Draft language for code text amendment) 20 Figure 22.70-13 Example of Suggested Deciduous Tree Planting � - ..� { �. � � �'' � � � rr �` �� , �� r _ �� r �`'� � �.4Y�M[�t#�ld+At1F,T��W�1 �— °—u1JY hVf�i I�Y��IJtG{IYI EA�I F�G 7�� _; '+l�1i91Lf�1'J�'+fliS�Tll��9f 4'�f 4��6 A$1�-� �� L�MhT6A�L'ldi�x � P�lM�14�5�D�4'i�lR��4�R u�''�1�R Pl+tl4Gf b�Y��1'�iF]��'[1 Gt A7 6�1i! �a�GIh4�E �'�.'"c�r- - �i14.C�^� �,��¢?'— -,�_�y _ "°"LY��8�1lGC�,4�Sl�94�F ° : � �9F�34fi€YAF�sA'CfH'llrtPie� ��da . � -...� _ �L,°''- �:=afl�er,nb�]aTi� � + ° � y� '�]Cri35f�MC�2l71u�11N1 y'�.'k�� '� � .. �� - -�H�JP�E' �CP'{9P��LL'�`]i1�c 4n.fEwuE �'`�*� �' � �4�`��ti�`w'��' i�Rtl1��P.A�.["�743F.�R�FFIILIE7�. ��tei'��c�,t'S" ��4��""-'t 4, �`+�,'� *�.. � ^` ,�*•�'� �,Y��.y,, �,t�'`�'�4 ��. �,. +'wu�e4rt�x�Yal�tu�€rto k��'*� �r`�'`'��'i '+�� fiy'�. ti ..�RE��T4�S+rE913�#aP�li� i f s.'��v�, 41_'�� F��f.-Jti_`. :F �C��c / / I CTA-03-11 (Draft language for code text amendment) 21 Fiqure 22.70-14 Example of Suqqested Deciduous Tree Plantinq .�� f ..I I � �, s'+. �/! r �� --• • ��- '9' . G� �.�.� ' �i i '. ��, �U��I t� ��I'1 L!�'�V St��€� � �"�C�IUS , � �_ Lri'�_. .. � ._ � .;a..i+�c..'.w,t ��,qll...��t+ • '��r.�vs � .... +,:i'f�+RW��+::._ _..,�.. __ '__" _ � y� �Pf � �I LY L4 Y �. � I CTA-03-11 (Draft language for code text amendment) 22 I Figure 22.70-154 Example of Suggested Conifer Tree Planting ,.�� .�� .,�� S�'�� SlI ;, �. MULCr P�,4GE� +I�.�� 3'�n.,'��a+'R�wi �i �,��il:i�'. ra�Il�S"�v!. �.+C�] � f hYJLGti*�-r�[]b�k1�,1H p, a�"�Il�"I n a��pit� `>1[iA. �r��`�4`A�v4C ►�a�77VG�C�IC�17:�� A_ ��, ��, F��u��wirr� ?1'�L4111N�;i,179 Rlil ��I ��N r P�IP�i i,R�Df I i -�� -I`- I . r 4� �� - � : � . . . ,. .,--�' . 1 CXI�a�F�5Clt}�� II.#W11M(r�-J�. I ��W-I.Glk, �, O. Recommended Planting Species. Refer to Appendix 22-A. (Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007). / I CTA-03-11 (Draft language for code text amendment) 23 CTA-03-11 EXHIBIT 2 PUBLIC COMMENTS � � ( I Karen Kendall � From: Steele Fitzloff[sfgavinassoc@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 3:24 PM To: Karen Kendall Cc: 'Timothy Gavin' Subject: FW: City of Spokane Valley proposes changes to fencing and landscaping (Section 22.70) of the SVMC One additionaf comment that should be considered for irnplement with#7 is `°Contractor cannot desi�n, install and �pprove their own work" This is really to protect the client from possibie poor or incompl�te work. i From: Steele Fitzloff mailto:sf avinassocCa�comcast.netl �� Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 3:16 PM ; To: 'kkendall@spokanevalley.org' � Cc: 'Timoth Gavin' Y Subject: FW: City of Spokane Valley proposes changes to fencing and landscaping (Section 22.70) of the SVMC Ka re n, �elow are our review comments on the proposed changes the landscapin�section of Municipal Code. 1. No comment 2. No cornment 3. Add "and nof adjacenf to a residential zone"after`in the absences of a residential component' , 4. No comment 5. Did not see anything to comment on '� 6. A.)Add a total width for Type I—Full Screen � B.)Adjust the linear feet for calculating points to be same linear feet between trees.. ex. 30' O.C. for Tr2es, 35 landscape points for every 30 linear feet 7. Licensed Landscape Architect required on sites "More than 5,000 sq.ft." We felt that for a Landscape Architeet to work ori anything srrialler than this wouid be more costly to the clients than the total cost of the piantings. However a landscape designer or other qualified person with irrigation and landscape design and installation; and local ' plant material should be highly recommended or required for the 500-5,000 sq.ft. categories. Tha n I<s, I St2ele Fitzloff Landscape Designer Gavin Associates Landscape Architecture LLC. (509) �69- 12�3 From: Karen Kendall [mailto:kkendall@spokanevalle .y oral ! Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 9:31 AM � To: Karen Kendall i Subject: City of Spokane Valley proposes changes to fencing and landscaping (Section 22J0) of the SVMC i The Spokane Valley City Council has directed staff to review the City's landscaping section of the Municipal Code to ensure that the regulations are not overly burdensome on our business community. Your input and expertise is highly valued and we encourage your review and comment on the upcoming proposed code changes. i i � � ; i � At this time, Staff is proposing the following changes to the landscaping section of Municipal Code (Title 22.70 Fencing, Screening and Landscaping) � 1. Clarify height of fences on Flanking Yards; 2. Correction to Clear View Triangle tables and definition; 3. Clarifying zones allowing barbed wire; 4. Streamline landscape point calculations; �. �e�nove landscaping requirement around �ign� in develop�d area�; 6. Providing more options to modify landscaping requirements; and 7. Changing threshold when a Landscape Architect is required. The Planning Commission will conduct a study session on September 22, 2011 followed by a public hearing on October 13, 2011. You are encouraged to participate and provide written feedback directly to me or at the public hearing before the Planning Commission regarding the proposed changes. You may view the proposal on the Planning Commission's page at www.s�okanevallev.org. Please forward information along to others you feel this would benefit. Thank you for your time and interest. K�FrL�N K��NP.4�� ,4ssistav�,tP��wweV, Covuwiuwi,t� DeV2I.nPw�ewtDePartw�ewt eCt� of spol�awe va��e� i 21�0��ast sprague ftvewue,su�te�.06 spo'rzav�.e va��e�, w�t99�o6 so9.��o.so��d�rect so9921.ioo�fax ww�o 12a v�.eva l�e�� Cowten,ts nf tl�i,s ennr�i,��wd aw� Ye�� qi�e sub�ect to Fubl�c di,sclosure. No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG- www.av .g com Version: 10.0.1392 /Virus Database: 1520/3892 -Release Date: 09/12/11 No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG- www.av�•� com Version: 10.0.1392/Virus Database: 1520/3894 -Release Date: 09/13/11 � � ( �_____.�_�..__.___ _ �._ __.�� ___ _.��__��_.._._._ � ; No virus found in this message. ' Checked by AVG- www.av .�m Version: 10.0.1410/Virus Database: 1520/3898 - Release Date: 09/15/11 2 � No virus found in this message. i Checked by AVG- www.avg_com ; Version: 10.0.1410 /Virus Database: 1520/3898 - Release Date: 09/15/11 I ; � I i i � I I �, � � � � ,, i I 3 ( i i i Karen Kendall From: Steven Neill[scneill@msn.com] Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2011 2:55 PM To: Karen Kendall; Scott Kuhta � Cc: John Hohman � Subject: Tree Planting I Attachments: 22.70-10 rewording.doc; Ohio State University Fact Sheet.doc � I i Hello All, � I am so sorry it took this long to do this, I have no real excuse. I have been looking at various City ordinances i and I could not find one that included the requirement to stake the trees nor did i find one that gave details on I how to plant them. I did however get permission from the Arbor Day Society(I have been a member for a decade now)to use their �uidelines:http://vwvw.arbordav.or�/trees/tips/as a resottrce for builders. I looked up what the City's of Portland, Spokane, and Seattle do since they are our closest big neighbors and they give a set of requirements for the type of trees planted as well as the need for permits in certain areas but again, they do not require staking the trees,they only give suggestions which I pasted below. Seattle: http://www.seattle.�ov/transportation/tree�lantin .g htm the guide is below httt�://www.seattle.gov/trans portation/newtree�lanting.htm � Spokane: http://s�okaneurbanforestrv.or /i.�ndex.php/Parks/pa�e/70/ Portland: httn://www.�ortlandonline.com/�arks/index.cfm?c=39712 the guide is below httt�://www.�ortlandonline.com/�arlcs/index.cfm?c=3 9712&a=164329 I really like the way the City of Seattle has there guideline laid out with good basic instructions on how to plant tree. However, we are not in the tree planting business so we may not want to go there. I am including the rewording of 22.70-10 to include the Arbor Site as an example. Should we want to incorporate the Seattle i approach, rewording their instructions to make them our own would not be a problem. But I am not sure how big of a can of worms you want to open. I am also including a list of outstanding trees from Ohio State � University that would be a great list for recommended and poor choice trees for our USDA Zone 5. Again, it is how much do we want to put into this that will determine what where we go from here. I did at least strikeout the unhealthy practice of staking all trees and give the property owner a good place to look for advice on planting their trees. I i i Below is a guideline from the ISA on structuring tree ordinances but again,how much work do we want to do? II International Society of Arboriculture Tree Ordinance Guidelines htt�://www.isa�arbor.com/education/onlineResources/treeOrdinanceGuidelines.aspx � In closing, it is my recommendation that we give a basic instruction on tree planting, it takes little work and will � benefit those who are not horticulturalists; I think we should have a list of recommended trees as well as on of i i popular trees that are poor choices for our area because of the long term problems they will cause. I feel that with a minimum amount of invested we can help the long term health of our City's forests,but as a private property advocate, I think this should be a choice, not a mandate. Steven Neill I I i � � ; �; i z � I I f. Each tree shall be planted a minimtun of two feet away from the outside of any permanent barrier of a landscaped area or edge of the parking area. �'N�� '��" '"° �4�'�°a ��~^ �°�'�^�' ��^{ ,°�� *'��„ ,'' ��N4'�� °N�'�N*;��, Trees should be planted according to the Arbor Day Societ_y 9 Tree Care Tips � Techniques Guide (http://www.arborday.org/trees/tips/). � I � ; ( I i I i ; ; i i �j , � I I I i � i Ohio State University Fact Sheet , �� Iorticulture and Crop S�ience � � 2001 Fyffe Court, Columbus, OH 43210-1096 , I Deciduous Trees and Shrubs With All-Season Interest HYG-1143- 6 9 . Michael Loos Jack Kerrigan Iaandall Zondag Developing interest in the landscape throughout the year is an objective for most gardeners. Selecting plants that have attractive characteristics during all four seasons helps gardeners reach . I their goal of a well-planned landscape. Some plants have several attributes that exhibit ornamental qualities during each season of the year. While attractive flowers may be the showiest characteristic,persistent ornamental fruit may extend the display into winter,while a distinct growth habit or form will be attractive when the plant is not in bloom or bearing fruit. Plants that bloom when other plants are not in blossom deserve special consideration. Foliage can provide varying shades of green or distinct contrast with yellow, red, or purple leaves. A blaze of autumn foliage color is a grand finale before the plant's more subtle winter � characteristics are revealed. Persistent fruit that is held into winter is attractive and may attract i wildlife. Patterned or textured bark is more evident when leaves have fallen and contrast nicely to a snowy background. Bold or unusual plant structure and form also are more evident after i leaves drop in autumn. j i Not all the plants listed have all these features,but each retains at least one outstanding ornamental characteristic all year. Planning will result in combinations of plants that complement each other throughout the year. An ever-changing, always interesting landscape is the result. All plants listed are hardy to Zone 5 (USDA); however, some may need-protection if exposed to harsh winter conditions. For additional information on these plants, see Michael A. Dirr's Manual of Woody Landscape Plants. , �� i ; I i _:::_:. . ...::�: �_ ;:: : :: � � : ��.� : � . ::� -... -._. . ::: .. �: . ' ' __. .. .� : . ,: - _ ,. ; � . �� . _; t : - - - _:.. ` .L..!.. B :� ,.- :._:. +:_��`' , : '... � �. ' .y� ..; :.::: �:e�� .. .:3.... ' 3 . l . � .... �.�. . 4� " 3 � '�f�e �' �� £ „" .._....:: _.�...: .i:al6 '� . : ...:. : :e:. e_ �.._.. e .. ..::Ee. :. ... . ..�, . e= :�.e£_";' � �=. ........ -.�. � " � � Y — _..; d �� ' �_ . �� ': ..'' ::: :: _ ,.:;...�� . _, . : ,-::_...�_ _ . � � .�:�`��',�.�-'... ..'..' � ii �. .E : .. .... �� ,; : . :�'�' . -: ... .�.'� �:. :'. `: � y . � �.. ''li'�j�`� : �ee . -_� C "' .�t II �L � ..._ : E. ., : : ...� .. .. ,.=-::. _ � . ... . __. �:�.::. _ :::._..._......................._. Figure 1. The peeling bark of a paperbark maple, Acer griseum. Medium to Large Trees j I (30 feet or taller at maturity) I Acer x campestre--hedge maple; 30 feet in height with an equal spread. Dense habit with � medium texture. Dark green foliage turns yellow in autumn. Bark is lightly ridged and furrowed, somewhat corky.Grows in any soil, but does better in rich,well-drained soi1. Tolerant of dry, compacted soil. Grows in sun or light shade. ( � Acer x freemanii (Acer rubrum)--Freeman maple; 40 to 60 feet in height with a broad columnar habit. Cultivars: 'Autumn Blaze,' 'Autumn Fantasy,' ' Celebration,' ' Lee's Red,' 'Marmo,' ' i Morgan,' and' Scarlet Sentinel'have good fall color. Acer rubrum--red maple; 40 to 60 feet in height with spread equal to or less than height. Bark is dark gray and rough, scaly, or ridged with age. Cultivars have an excellent red to orange autumn il color; `Autumn Flame,' ' Embers,' and 'Red Sunset.' Requires acidic soil and needs moisture. Betula nigra—river birch; 40 to 70 feet in height with spread a little less or equal to height. The cinnamon-colored, exfoliating bark of the River Birch is spectacular in the winter. Lustrous, medium-green leaves. Most borer resistant birch. Tolerant of both wet soils and dry stumiiers. Avoid very alkaline soils. Cladrastis lutea--yellowwood; 30 to 50 feet in height with a spread of 40 to 55 feet. Low- i branching and broad crown with bright green leaves that turn yellow to gold in autumn. White, i wisteria-like flowers give an excellent display every 2 to 3 years. Seed pods are decorative after ; leaves fall. Grow in well-drained soil in full sun. Pruning usually required to improve the tree's � structure. ; �I I Fagus sylvatica--European beech; 50 to 60 feet in height with a spread of 35 to 45 feet. Many � fine forms and cultivars. They include upright, weeping, and dwarf selections. All have smooth gray bark. There are many leaf colors and shape variations. 'Roseo-marginata' and 'Riversii' are particularly popular. Grow in moist, well-drained, acidic soil in full sun to light shade. Gymnocladus dioicus--Kentucky coffeetree, 60 to 75 feet in height with a spread of 40 to 50 feet. Bold,picturesque form is this tree's most imposing characteristic. Rough, scaly, gray to dark brown bark and attractive pods add to interest during winter. Unfolding leaves have a pinkish to purple tinge gradually turning a dark green in stunmer. Flowers are greenish-white and female flowers have the aroma of roses. Halesia carolina--Carolina silverbell, 30 to 40 feet in height with a spread of 20 to 35 feet, often smaller with a spreading habit. White flowers appear in April and May before the leaves. Dark green leaves turn yellow and fall very early in autumn. Dry, winged fruits are effective from September to late autumn. Multicolored, ridged and furrowed bark is interesting during winter. Requires acid soil. Liquidambar styrac�ua--sweetgum, 60 to 75 feet in height with a spread of 40 to 50 feet. This tree is neatly pyramidal in form,broadening as it ages. Its bark becomes corky beginning with young branches. The leaves are star-shaped with excellent red and orange autumn color. ' Gold ' Dust'has leaves speckled with yellow. Metasequoia glyptostroboides; Dawn Redwood rapidly grows to 75-100' or taller and 15-25' wide, with a pyramidal shape. A truly beautiful deciduous conifer, this rapid grower that can make an excellent shade or street tree if the lot is large enough. The overall shape of the mature tree is conical. The bark is gray to slightly reddish in color, and the needles are a lightgreen which turn a brilliant copper color in the fall before they drop. Nyssa sylvatica--black tupelo,black gum, or sour gum, 30 to 50 feet in height with a spread of 20 to 30 feet. Pyramidal when young, becoming more oval when mature. Bark is almost black and is thick with a very blocky appearance. Exhibits one of the best,bright red autumn colors. � Plant in a well-drained, acidic soil. � Oxydendrum arboreum--sourwood, 30 feet in height with a spread of 20 feet. Grows slowly with a pyramidal form with rounded top and drooping branches. Bark is dark brown and deeply ' furrowed, giving a checkered appearance. Leaves are deep green in siunmer becoming brilliant yellow,red, and purple in autumn. White, fragrant, drooping clusters of flowers bloom in early ' summer. Requires a well-drained, acidic soil with high organic content. Phellodendron amurense--amur corktree, 30 to 45 feet in height with a spread of 15 to 20 feet. Horizontally spreading branches create interesting shape. Bark is heavy and corky. Deep green leaves turn yellow to bronze in fall. Pyrus calleryana--callery pear, 30 to 50 feet in height with a spread of 20 to 35 feet. Showy � white flowers cover tree in spring. Shiny, dark green leaves of suminer turn yellowish orange to � i � E reddish purple in fall. ' Aristocrat'has a broad-pyramidal outline. ' Capital,' ' Chanticleer,' ' Cleveland Select,' and ' Stonehill'have a compact,upright-pyramidal habit. � Quercus macrocarpa--burr oak, 70 to 80 feet in height with an equal spread. Heavy in textttre, I with coarse bark,this is one of many worthwhile oaks. Fringed nuts are ornamental. Other oaks ; to consider include Q. bicolor (swamp white oak), Q. coccinea(scarlet oak), Q. imbricaria i (shingle or laurel oak), Q. robur (English oak), Q. rubra(Red oak) and Q. shumardii (Shumard oak). � Stewartia pseudocamellia--Japanese stewartia, 20 to 40 feet in height with an equal or smaller spread. Attractive camellia-like flowers appear in late stunmer and continue until frost. Dark green leaves turn vibrant red and orange in autumn. The exfoliating bark creates a beautiful pattern of white,beige and dark brown. A truly spectacular tree for the protected site. Soil should be moist and acidic with a high organic content. , � a � �� . 4 �&� ;.. � f� �� '� �. �� - Figure 2. The buds of a saucer magnolia,Magnolia x soulangiana, glistening in the winter sun. � � Small Trees and'Large Shrubs � (8 to 30 feet at maturity) Acer griseum--paperbark maple, 20 to 25 feet in height with a spread 10 to 20 feet. In addition to papery.bark texture, the form of this tree makes it an outstanding addition to any landscape. The cinnamon brown bark exfoliates on young to intermediate aged trees, although this trait decreases as the tree matures. The autumn foliage is bronze to brilliant red. Acer japonicum--fullmoon maple, 20 to 25 feet in height with an equal to slightly larger spread. Very similar to Japanese maple,the fullmoon maple has a more rounded palmate leaf. ' Aconitifolium'has brilliant red fall foliage. Zone 5 to 7. I ; , i i li �I i I i Acer palmatum--Japanese maple, 8 to 25 feet in height with an equal to slightly larger spread. Mature height varies with cultivars. Hundreds of cultivars are available that vary in leaf form, texture, variegation, and seasonal color. ' Bloodgood'has deep purple-red foliage. 'Burgundy Lace' does not hold the red color as well. Of the forms with highly dissected leaves, ' Crimson Queen,' ' Ever Red,' ' Garnet,' 'Red Select,' ' Shidare,' and' Tamukeyama' are recommended. � i Amelanchier arborea--downy serviceberry, Juneberry, or shadbush, 15 to 25 feet in height. This shrubby tree features white blossoms early in spring. The dark green leaves become orange to red in autumn. Smooth bark with narrow fissures becomes ridged and furrowed with age. The fine, elegant texture is attractive even in winter. Base selection of cultivar on height, growth habit, fruit size, and fall color. A. x grandiflora is also recommended. Chionanthus virginicus--fringe tree, 15 to 25 feet in height with an equal spread. The shape of this tree is variable, but generally spreading and open. Multiple stems are common. Flowers are very showy and similar to the Japanese tree lilac. Fruit forms only on female trees and looks like loose clusters of grapes. Autumn color is yellowish and variable. The bark becomes ridged and heavy as the tree matures. Cornus kousa--Kousa or Chinese dogwood, 20 to 25 feet in height with an equal spread. Mature specimens ha�e horizontal branching. Textured, exfoliating bark is attractive in winter. The floral bracts appear later than those of the native dogwood and the fruit is larger and showier than in Cornus florida. This tree or multistemmed shrub is borer and disease resistant. Dark green leaves turn reddish-purple to scarlet in fall and are effective for several weeks. Zone 5 to 8. Cornus mas--cornelian cherry, 20 to 25 feet in height with a spread of 15 to 20 feet. Small yellow flowers open in very early spring before the leaves appear. This is a multistemmed shrub or small tree with a rounded form. The exfoliating bark varies from gray-brown to rich-brown and is attractive all year. Fall foliage color is minimal. Fruit is cherry-like and drops in late summer. Crataegus phaenopyrum--Washington hawthorn, 20 to 30 feet in height with a spread of 20 to 25 feet. This rounded tree is dense and thorny. The white flowers in spring and glossy red fruits in autumn, persisting into winter are very showy. Foliage is lustrous green in summer,turning orange to scarlet or purple in autumn. For excellent fruit, fewer thorns and a slightly larger tree, consider C. viridis ' Winter King.' Magnolia stellata--star magnolia, 15 to 20 feet in height with a spread of 10 to 15 feet. Attractive white to gray bark is best appreciated against a dark background. White, fragrant flowers open in early spring and are often damaged by late freezes and wind. 'Royal Star'blooms slightly later than the species and other cultivars. Dark green leaves turn yellow to bronze in autumn. Grows better in acidic soil. Malus hybrids--crabapples, 12 to 25 feet in height with an equal or lesser spread. Very showy � spring flowers are followed by colorful fall fruit. Some cultivars have persistent fruit. There are ' many cultivars and selection should be based on flower, foliage, fruit,habit, and disease- � resistance characteristics. ' ' i i I I i ,� � � Parrotia persica--Persian parrotia, 20 to 40 feet in height with a spread of 15 to 30 feet. This is a foliage tree, with leaves unfolding as a reddish-purple,turning to a lustrous green and then finishing in fall as brilliant yellow to orange to scarlet. With age,the bark becomes exfoliating, revealing an array of gray, green,white, and brown. The petalless flowers appear before the foliage and the crimson stamens are curiously attractive. Styrax japonica--Japanese styrax or snowbell, 20 to 30 feet in height and an equal or greater � spread. The white,bell-shaped flowers are beautiful and showy May to June. The foliage turns yellow to reddish in fall and is held on the tree late in the season. This low-branched tree is finely � textured and has a horizontal structure that is distinctive in winter. The bark is grayish brown and I smooth with irregular, interlacing fissures of cinnamon brown. Hardy to Zone 5,this tree should be grown in a protected, east-facing exposure. Plant in a well-drained,moist, acidic soil. j ; Viburnum plicatum var. tomentosum--doublefile viburnum, 8 to 10 feet in height with an equal � or slightly greater spread. Horizontal branching structure produces a strong effect, especially in � front of a brick wall. The leaves are nicely textured and turn reddish purple in fall.Very showy � white flowers appear in May. The fruit, which is usually eaten by birds, is bright red changing to i black. It is effective in July and August. Good cultivars include ' Shasta' and'Mariesii.' Zone 5 ; to 8. Spring planting recommended. � � Small Shrubs (under 8 feet at maturity) Berberis thunbergii--Japanese barberry, 3 to 6 feet in height with a spread of 4 to 7 feet. This densely branched,rounded shrub is one of the first to leaf out in the spring. Foliage is bright green turning orange, scarlet, and reddish purple in autumn. The foliage tends to hide the small yellow flowers,but the bright red berries are showy beginning in October and continuing into winter. Cultivars to consider are 'Aurea' and'Kobold.'Recommended purple foliage cultivars include atropurpurea' Crimson Pygmy' and'Rose Glow.'Berberis koreana, Korean barberry is similar and also recommended. Cotoneaster apiculatus--cranberry cotoneaster, 3 feet in height by 3 to 6 feet spread. Stiff, herringbone pattern of branching is interesting all year. Glossy green leaves turn a bronzy-red to ; purple in fall. The small, pink flowers are attractive at a close range. The cranberry�red fruit provide an excellent showing in late fall through winter. Fothergilla gardenii--dwarf fothergilla, 2 to S feet in height with a similar spread. The white, � fragrant, bottlebrush-like flowers appear in early spring before the foliage. Leaves are dark green ( to blue-green,turning yellow, orange to scarlet in autumn,holding color late into the season. The ; slender, zig-zagging stems forming a dense colony are interesting in winter. Plant in partial shade ! in a well-drained, acidic soil with high organic content. I Hydrangea quercifolia--oakleaf hydrangea; 4 to 6 feet in height with an equal spread. This rather coarse shrub provides an excellent contrast in the landscape. The foliage is a deep green in sununer turning to red, orangish brown, and purple in auttunn. The flowers open white in late i I June and age to purple-pink and finally brown. The bark of mature plants is cinnamon-brown and exfoliates. Ilex verticillata--winterberry or Michigan holly, 6 to 10 feet in height with an equal spread. Slender stems with dense branching make this a fine natural screen. Leaves are a deep green in summer but no significant fall color. The fruit is bright red and ripens in late August,persisting into January. ' Sparkleberry' is a choice hybrid cultivar due to excellent fruit color. As with other � hollies, both sexes are needed to get berries on the female plants. Plant in moist, acidic soil with � a high organic content. i Rhus aromatica--fragrant sumac,2 to 6 feet in height with a spread of 6 to 10 feet. A low, irregular, spreading shrub with a medium texture. Ordinary green leaves turn orange, red to reddish-purple in autumn. The yellowish flowers yield fuzzy, red-orange fruit in autumn, persisting into winter. ' Gro-low' is a recommended low-growing cultivar. Adaptable regarding soil texture, it grows best in acidic soil. Grows in full sun to partial shade. Viburnum opulus 'compactum'--dwarf European cranberrybush viburnum; 2 to 4 feet in height ' with a slightly greater spread. This u�right, spreading, multistemmed shrub forms a rounded mound. The glossy, dark green leaves turn yellow-red to reddish-purple in autumn. Showy white flowers appear in May followed by berry-like fruits in September. The dwarf cultivars do not fruit well. This plant is very adaptable to a variety of soils and grows in full sun to light shade. Trees not recommended for the Spokane Valley: Populus spp. (Poplars/Quaking Aspen) Tops are brittle and break up easily in storms and their roots seek out waterlines causing damaged pipes I Salix spp. (willows, including weeping) Roots are particularly hard on sewers. � I Betula pendula - Extremely succeptabie to the bronze birch borer which generally kills the I tree while in its prime years. � I I i I � � , I i I ; , i Karen Kendall F ; From: Gloria Mantz � Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 11:50 AM � To: Karen Kendall � Ce: Inga Note � SubJect: Title 22.70 � i Hi Karen, Can you add the following language after Figure 22.70-1 Clearview triangles for new development and new commercial driveway approaches shall be calculated using the methods presented in SVMC 22.130.040 Street Standards. Thanks C�lori� Gloria Mantz, P.E. Development Engineer City of Spokane Valley 509-720-5321 I I i � � I ; � �I 1 II i � i i Karen Kendall C , From: Deanna Griffith I� Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 1:17 PM � To: Bekkedahl, Robin I Cc: Karen Kendall Subiect: RE: COSV Planning Commission agenda- 12-08-11 ii Robin, Thank you for your comments. We will submit these to the Planning Commission on Thursday evening during their continued public hearing. ' Dea v�,v�,a .' From: Bekkedahl, Robin [mailto:Robin.BekkedahlCc�avistacor .com] Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 12:24 PM � To: Deanna Griffith � Subject: RE: COSV Planning Commission agenda - 12-08-11 Hi D�anna: 7hank y�u for pro�idin� rr7�th� in��rrr�atian on the�oSV �C a�enda re��rding text amendrrrer�t chan�es on�VMC 1�itle 22 Landscapingo Avista has conc�r�s r�lating ta th� revised su��ested lan�uage regarding c�ur facilit�es. F. Barbed wire, concertina or razor wire may be used for security purposes in mixed use, commercial and industrial zoning districts in the absence of a residential component only on the upper one-quarter of the fence in industrial zoning districts. Barbed wire, concertina or razor wire shall not be permitted in any residential zoning district(except for confining animals, see Section 22.70.020.G and H) or in any commercial and mixed use zoning district adjacent to any public right-of-way. Some of our facilities, such as electrical substations, must be fenced. The fence serves as both a public safety measure � and as a security for the facility. For these reasons,we require 7 foot fabric with 3 strands of barbed wire on top. The i proposed language indicates that this will not be allowed in residential zones or mixed use and commercial zones I adjacent to any public right of way. Electric Substations are required to be located in all of these zones for the critical � and essential service we provide. Streets, alleyways, and platted rights of way not improved are considered public right � of way and substations are almost always adjacent to these rights of way, The 7'fence with barbed wire is critically important to public safety and substation security. With that, we recomrrrend that electric substations be exempt from i this proposed regulation. Avista would recommend that this section read: � F. Barbed wire, concertina or razor wire may be used for security purposes in mixed use, commercial and industrial zoning districts in the absence of a residential component only on the upper one-quarter of the fence in industrial zoning districts. Barbed wire, concertina or razor wire shall not be permitted in any residential zoning district(except for confining animals, see Section 22.70.020.G and H) or in any commercial and mixed use zoning district adjacent to any public right-of-way, with the exception that critical and essential utility facilities, such as substations are exempt from this. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Again thank you for the opportunity to comment. � r��in L. ekkedahl j Sr. Environmental Scientist ! Cultural Resources, Natural Resources, Project Permitting j Avista Utilities P.O. Box 3727 Spokane, WA 99220-3727 i 1 ; .. ..... . . i i � Telephene: 509-495-�657 '� Fax: 509-495-4�52 Email: robin.bekkedahlC7a.avistacorp.com This mess�ge and any attached file�or clocument§may contain infermation that is confid�ntial and 6onsidered proprieYary to�vista Cerporation, Any unauthorized use,transfer,or disclosure of the information contained herein is strictly forbidden. If you believe that this message has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error and delete the message. Fr��: Deanna �riffith [mailto:d�riffithC�s�ekane:�allP�;.er�] ; Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 3:00 PM ; To: Deanna Griffith j Subject: COSV Planning Commission agenda - 12-08-11 i Current Plannin�Commission A e� nda On the agenda for 12-08-11 meeting is a continued public hearing on a proposed text amendment to SVMC Title 22, amending sections of the Landscaping code and a public hearing on a proposed text amendment to SVMC Title 20, regarding requirements for a record of survey. Please do not hesitate to let us know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Deanna tyriffith, CFM Admin Assist, Community Deve%pment City of Spokane �alley 11707 E. Sprague A ve, Suite 106 Spokane �alley, WA 99206 509-720-5301, direct 509-921-1008, fax ; d9ri�thCa7spokanevalle,%�org Contents of this email and any reply are subject to public disc%sure, "Those who say it cannot be done should not stop those who are doing it." - The Roman Law Notice;Individua/s p/anning to attend a meeting who require specia/assistance to accommodate physical,hearing or other impairments p/ease contact the City C/erk at 509-921-1000 as soon as possib/e so that arrangements may be made, i �� i i � I I I 2 5�� - Department of Community Development �r ::aY# ��y� _ �Varle� , Planning Division e . � " i�7' _ Plannin Commission g �a,n��,� � ��s. . . January 12, 2012 Code Text Amendment of Chapter 2 2 .70 �en�in and �anc��ca in � � � ��r��a��-�� . Department of Community Development � e►��, �_ Varle � f.Y# yw � � ,�'_.. Planning Division e , i�;. � Summar of uestions . . . Y q 1 . Clearview Triangles; The Planning � Driveway in the definition applies to commercial driveways, alleys and residential driveways serving 3 or more lots. Does not Commission apply to individual residential driveways. requested , staff to follow 2. Barbed Wire Fencing; up on 4 topics .�rc Avista requested an exception. Propose to add language allowing from the exception with Director's approval of an administrative December 8, determination. 2011 � � �� ; �� .��, � � ��-r��r�; � ., ;, r ' �� continued � �°'` '' ` �:�� ' �� pUbI1C Barbed P�"opose to be allowed Not allowed except in Not allowed. Allowed in regional �]eaj'1]Zg. Wire in commercial, mixed certain commercial commercial and r� use and industrial zone and industrial zones industrial zones,only �' FenCing on top'/of fence. Not with 3 strands on top on top '/4 of fence. adjacent to ROW in of 6 foot fence. Fence May be used for utility commercial and mixed must be 12 feet from or institutional uses in use zones. curb line. other zones for health/safety purposes. ��. Department of Community Development � e►��, �_ Varle � f.Y# yw � � ,�'_.. Planning Division e , i�;. � Summar of uestions . . . Y q 3 . Landscaping Points; The Planning � Intent of proposal is providing relief of landscaping requirements to projects less than 500 square feet. Commission requested � Remove Section 22.70.030.G.6 staff to follow 4. Tree Staking up on 4 topiCS ,�, Change language so staking is not required, but optional and from the specify a time limit of 12 months when staking must be December 8, removed. 2 011 .,� Added a Figure of ' , continued �'� underground tree stabilization. �f publiC (Figure 22.70-14) ',� , o=�' hearing. ,�.,.ti:-,�' r��. � '',� '�' P�lulchta1m Low stake radius - _ _ � � �"� ..��...,�_ _ -- �_ ��__ : � �; �� -� Department of Community Development � e►��, �_ Varle � f.Y# yw � � ,�'_.. Planning Division e , i�;. � Back round g Proposed Amendments �ity �ouncil ,� Clarify fence height on Flanking Yards; directed staff ,,� Correction to Clear View Triangle tables and to m� definition; snecific areas within the � Clarify which zones allow barbed wire; fencing and ,� Streamline landscape point calculations; landscaping ,� Remove landscaping requirement around standards in signs in developed areas; Chapter 22.�0. � provide more options to modify landscape ,� requirements; and � � Establish threshold when a Landscape Architect is required. �� -� Department of Community Development � e►��, �_ Varle � f.Y# yw � � ,�'_.. Planning Division e , i�;. ��f � Pro osed Amendments p 22.7a.02U General rovisians —Fencin . � - - - + - - - - - B.Ar�y fence or�II erected ar placed behind tl�e mino�nurn required frontyard�etba�k line an a flankin�, side or re�r v�€d m�y b� e�ec�ed or maintained�a� �n�ximu�n 6�eight�f�ig�t fee�ab�ve Che �djacent gr�de in res�dential zar�o�g distri�ts. Lots �viC�u d�u�le street frontage m�y have� fence construc#ed on the pro�e�ty l�rue around t6�e ya�d no��sed a� the main paint�f�ccess �ti�e a��renf��re�r yard}. G. hleither residec�taa6,c�mmercial or �r�d�astrs�l fen�ing,fYOf�Il�51�F1t[J�75�fUG'�IOfl IfiCILldIIlC�'V2��e.3�1[Jll, which car��ti�utes a ha��rd ta the tra�eling public sh�ll be permitled Qn any�^�lot in anyz��e wuthin �n�� a��tn� ��clear+�iew triangle°a� 5et f�rtk� �eQo�v: �.A clear�ae�v triangle is a cneasurement�pplied at th� intersecti�n af t�vo str�eets, or the �ntersection af ar�alley:p�ivate road ar�'nm��driveway�nd a street to ens�r�unob�tructed viswon�of motarists �nd pedes�rians.UVithin the clearview triangle,the��ace between thRee and Qne-half feet arod sever�fe�t�b�v�the stir��t, or thr�e feet ab�ve the�ide�valk,mu�t be un�bstruc�ed and cal�ulat�d as fallows: Page 1 �� -� Department of Community Development � e►��, �_ Varle � <::,,, y'w � � ,�'_.. Planning Division e , i�;. ��f � Pro osed Amendments p ��'�rtrianql�s f�r new devef�pm�nt and new c�mm�rcG�f driv�way appr�ach�s sF�all be c�l��ilat�d usinq th�meth�ods Rres�nted in SVf��9�2�.130.44�] �tre�t Standards. a.kJncontr411ed Interse�tion. The right isasceles triangfe having sides of 5� feet measure along the curb lin� �of ea�h intersecting I�c�l acces�stre�t�or five f�et from edge af pavement for a street ti�vith no curbs) _��°„ �-.�- ^r��-.,r.,��-.,131�a�-��.�°,�.��,��see Figure 2�.7[l-��; ❑e Figure 22_7�-2 kJncontrofl�d Intersectian __ � �o� . - �(1!Fr. ��° ��t,a�±�+��s��r ta�a1�sr�€r� � �'- �r - . _ _ ,ti.�.e__F{ _ _ _d��,��..�nt�rr ue �� f�,f. ��--... � r ��r'"��{�� } f � � + � /� �f_ '1 � � � � . ' 'I�� r + ��-�f t' ��-°� '�` - - ...5 '•w-..� . A3'1� ��B�i�lC.l�YSR.��Y�}R�.�L r ,� ..y ��1��r+��{��..��Y y � � � ' ti s� � k- � �`�= �' �,� f� .�..�. C'�iY PK}ff�`i1fA.Y LYT'R I�T�4VA7 - Page 2 �� -� Department of Community Development � e►��, �_ Varle � <::,,, y'w � � ,�'_.. Planning Division e , i�;. ��f � Pro osed Amendments p Figu�e22.7�-2fln�rrn#ro�ked fntersett�an �l�oe�,x�s§vere � � L,e.:.a�sstfe�t� —�:uRe � �� - - - - - - -�� - - - - - - --- �. �'R{WfiC�'Ll4f ��C!P£R�"�f�Ll°lf �F�-0f=sV�.Y .,� ' .' � _ .� � ,.a h� i � � � � ; � � �f �� , � �� w � ; }� h� � , �, � � � ,; � � ' � � `�� f N�E:Ifn�.urhi�pra7=_nt, � `o `o /' measurein5fe=_ttox,erds � ¢ / h� the pr�pert+�lin�fr�m th=_ � =_d�e�fthe r�adw=_y. � � �a� - {�� R IGk.-0F�t'.�Y R IGF+r-0f�-i1dAY Page 3 �� -� Department of Community Development � e►��, �_ Varle � <::,,, y'w � � ,�'_.. Planning Division e , i�;. ��f � Pro osed Amendments p b.T°�ro-Vw'ay Stop Controlled Inters�ction. The ri�httriangle 17aring a 16-foot sid�e meas�ired along the curb line of a local acc�ss street (or fi=re feet from edge of pavement for a street with no c�irbs). all�y or commercial driveway. and the distanc�e sha•,�n on Table 22.70-1 based on pasted speeei along the si�ie alang the eurb line of the intersecting street (or five feet fram edge of pavement for a street with no eurbsj (see FigUre 22.7L1-3;1: ar Figur�e 22.71�-3 Twa-Way �top Coi�trolleci Intersection _ _ _ �.. - �� , .. .. �r+Rl F a4d, � _ !�T¢,rAY�:E 746t _ . TFik]Yyi HWkF+1 ��.�_ IHLlIlal#i11�P � ��CJ6 �.. " �.'""°_'_.'_` _"' :�� i _.. ' '_e. _ ,� ��dIYN�'I��F'kF7 f �'�f f�, � �-� �'\� l `- f lTKA'FJ117��+. - _ Y�, � ��I,' �� _ �_�- . � `�� "`� . I " ��`�_ ! --{ •r" _ _� �__,� � �. _ i. � . -�____ I r��r aa��a r�a�as,�+�r�s rsrn�r+ns� � �� , �� _.— a� wr�r�r�rr wrca m��aR n�wv►�r�rr `�� , . 1.� q*v wiG��'�v'-.rnr arr irrr tr w�Fr Page 3 �� -� Department of Community Development � e►��, �_ Varle � f.Y# yw � � ,�'_.. Planning Division e , i�;. ��f � Pro osed Amendments p Figure22.70-3Twa-tiAfay StopC:o�teofked[n#ersectian � ie_Tea�c°s.:Z.:rl � F�- SreYChe32.i'}1 � ,n:]�h:t^xt I ��n St� � fUR9 � � __---- � �� Table 22.70-1 ;�� °"' _�+soi�i r��trnFeo�i � � R�,#��Ax Twa-Way Stap Cantralled � ' 31RflPER�' � �� ,,,,E Intersectian �� • o '�� '� Pa�ted 5peed (in MPH) Distance (in Feet} o N O�TE:If n..u rh i z p re se nt, � mm=_surzin5feettov.ards �� +�d � th2 pr�p=_rtYlingfrCm#h=_ :r-r S„� .� ed��afth=_�oadway. �d ��J RKaI-r-0F=.e'J.�IY uRe RlGh�-0F�=sk'AY 3 5 11� Page 4 5�� - Department of Community Development �r ::aY# ��y� _ �Varle� , Planning Division e . � " i�7' r�� Pro osed Amendments � p F�g�cQ�2.7�-�Yield-Controlled Intersection �4 ----�.ea F� ? 9D FT. i _.—=-- -- � . � � n-�ia�k�i 97AEE� � �-CU� •_ i _ �..��_ �,�-�-.� � . _ ��`°-CRYHCliT�N'AY p s4 �A� '" _�-- �w � t ��1�'� .r� � ��"' �-PROPERIY fJf+E �-� r�`r , � r - -- � }�i };� ---- _ ��~~ - -_ �1� 1 � �_l �, __ � {tt�'Fll�iT-0E-WAY Cfd'P f1i�4r�OFiYfAY Figure22.7{9-4Yiefd-Con#colRed[n#ersectiern � �hraWih S[reet � � nea��tr�e[ � 'LP3 �- ___� � �_ � .--� y 4 m � k � �� tjy ��R�NT#-15'AY �� \ + I JI � .I"f `{UR9� RIGF-0f-'.V0.Y L�f RIGN��£=N.3T `II'.'�;av�Stao Controlled_The trianal�deterr�ined b�a the Citv traffic enuine�r usinc Page 5 ASHT�] siaht distance raauirements for all-4w�av ston controlled inieesections or �� -� Department of Community Development � e►��, �_ Varle � <::,,, y'w � � ,�'_.. Planning Division e , i�;. ��f � Pro osed Amendments � p Figure 22.76-5 Noncammercial Driueway s�r. - �rr � _.. Y�� --�s �-x xaae � °`d . — . ��rwrw,�r-w,a, . . .. s. _ .. ' �`-..` - � - — - - - - _ _ '- -�Ef�?1'6JME _ � � -�� J j� _- � - ~ � f'. , \ `S ,� ✓� '�� p ;r'�r �sN _ �--e ` , �;• f, �P �. � _.� �—__ �_- �,J;— — — — —; :� — — _ Figure 2�.70-5 NoncnmmerciaE driueway � 5ss� � � str�c ..t� �:uxs .,.._..� ' _ �. . . �PR'3PER"fLUE �� {RY `.ti, 3 C /fr /�I RiGF•^.{F'�YA7 `� _ � rr �,. . o `~� � f-, � � EGGEOF��—�E� Page 6 ➢RIrE1NAY ➢RfY#1WA'I 5�� - Department of Community Development �r ::aY# ��y� _ �Varle� , Planning Division e . � " i�7' r�� Pro osed Amendments p F_ �arbed ,,.��° ^r r��^�- v�rir� ma}�be u�ed for��curity pur�pos�� in mi��d us�, �amm�r�ial and industrial z�ninq distri�ts in th� abs�n�� of a re�id�ntial ��amponent or�ly on the upper on�-quart�r of t�e fence-i�+ ;�,�,�,�+�-�� ,�,��,n �,��+�-;.,+c Barbed=��ro ^�,�,^oF��,� :,r �°��,r�,ri�e shall not �e p�rmitted in any re�id�ntial zoninq distri�t ��c��pt f�r�onfinir�q animals, se� S�cti�n ��_7�..�J��_� and H� �r in an� cammer�ial and mi�ced us�e�or�ing di�trict adjacent t� any public right-of-��vay_An administrati�e d�t�rmir�ati�an ma�b� mad�b�the [�irect�r f�r�amm�mity fa�ilities s��ekinq relief fr�m barbed��vire r�quir�ments�_ �_ In an� residential z�nin� district, barb�.d wire fences ma�be �as��d t� c�nfine animals, if th� parcel me�tsth� r�q�iir�ments cantained in �e�ti�n �9.4�].��7. Page 7 �� -� Department of Community Development e►��, �_ Varle � <::,,, y'w � � ,�'_.. Planning Division e , i�;. ��f � Pro osed Amendments p 3. A�II trees and �h�ubs shall be planted and maintair�ed in accordanc.e �nrit� the standards of the �fTl$flCc`ll'1 ."�' ccr}��io+irin r�{ r�o.Iiirc•cn:r7��n�tc`�I`l�c`1fC� �Of �UfS�f]� .�tL]C�. �� fl$4�'��P �I��flt$[� tf$$S c`lfl� shrubs s�all be mul�hed ar�d maint�ined to �i�e a cle�rl and w�eed-free appear�r�ce. Page 8 �. All trees and shrubs shall be planted and maintained in accordance vwith the standards of the �tPT1�fIC�I'I .`�' c•cnriotini7 n�C+.Ii irc•�n.°��i...ii i�o rnn,r nf•.s.hirh ic• ni7 fila in fh.:. nloi7i7inr-i raG��`�Stand�rd f€�r�Jurs�er�r �t€�ck. All ne�rrly planted trees and shrubs shall be mulched and maintained to give a clean and weed-free appear�nce. Page 9 �� -� Department of Community Development � e►��, �_ Varle � <::,,, y'w � � ,�'_.. Planning Division e , i�;. ��f � Pro osed Amendments � � p Ta�i��z.�o� — Landseaping Poin#� Required f�r Developmen#. Addi#i�ns �r Si#e AI#�ra#i�ns ' Size �f Dev�loped Nurnber of Poin#s Ftequired Are� �J_ ti�'ii�r �j�r�E?IIl�� = 1ii �r�o - �:��o ��. ft. ��t� ��,t� _�� 2.5fJ1u — 5,U00 sq. ft. �ite points =50 h�lore than 5:000 sq. �ite points =50 plus one point for each �UO sq. ft. of area o�der ft. 5:00� sq. ft. Parkirrg i� Two points per required parking space arrd arre point for each proposed additior�al p�rking space 3. Lans�scaping Pl�n Requir�ments. :� lar7�lscapin�plan shall b� pr�p�r�cl a�nd se�led by� a r�raistere�l I�n�sc�p�e �rchitect 5n+hen propos�l exceeds 1�J� I�n�sc�pe poir7ts. All landsc�pe pl�ns shall includ� th� si�e �n� type of laridsc�ping m�terials. the dim�nsions of th�e tr�ct. and � g,.�int c�lculation sho�ving campliance+�+,�ith tl7is provision. Pagell 5�� - Department of Community Development �r ::aY# ��y� _ �Varle� , Planning Division e . � " i�7' r�� Pro osed Amendments p � f, _ cl7oll rarri iir�• , nf 1f1 nr�inta• onrl } Page 12 5�� - Department of Community Development �r ::aY# ��y� _ �Varle� , Planning Division e . � " i�7' r�� Pro osed Amendments p f. Each tfee shall be planted � minimUm of tvwo feet a+�vay from the outside of an�+ pefmanent k�arrier of a landscaped area or ed�e of the parkin� area. Trees s�ia-��k e staked for a period af not�-ss mor�than 1� months after plar�tin�; 5 6�. Parking areas limited to commercial loading and truck maneuvenn� are limited to pro�,rision of street trees along public ri€�hts-of-+�ray; planted at inten+als no greater than 30 feet on center. 7�. h,llodifi�ations to protect draina�e features, e�sements, or facilities shall be allo�eed. 8�. The requirements of this se�tion shall not apply to parking �arages or parkin� decl�s: or display areas for automotive and equipment aales and rentals. 9. Proposals r��uiring t�n �1 aj n��w parkiny �talls or I�ss are ��empt from landscapin�points four�� inTabl� 22.��1�. Page 15 5�� - Department of Community Development �r ::aY# ��y� _ �Varle� , Planning Division e . � " i�7' r�� Pro osed Amendments p �. ��W SI�I-Y S�fU�Uf�S �Il c'3 fU��C��V�I��C� SI��}�tirill r�rii iira r-ninim�l varicr�oninr+i ni irci ionttn ei ih,c�rtinn Ilr�,fthic ��-+��,�,.�re exempt fram lands�c�pin�. Page 16 �� -� Department of Community Development � e►��, �_ Varle � <::,,, y'w � � ,�'_.. Planning Division e , i�;. ��f � Pro osed Amendments p e. �dditi�n� �r eac��n�i�ns �n �ev�l�p�d In��tria�l��ne� pr��rtie� m�y be exempt fr�m I�ndsc�pin� rec�uirem�nt�,�,vh�re it is sha�n tnatth� inst�ll�tian �f landsc�pin� is r��t �easible. Page 17 �� -� Department of Community Development � e►��, �_ Varle � <::,,, y'w � � ,�'_.. Planning Division e , i�;. ��f � Pro osed Amendments p M. Installati�n, Maint�nanc�,an� Enf�dc��n�nt. 1 Prior to the is�u�r��e af� cer[ific�te of occ�p�ncy, persan{s}w�ho prepared I�ndscape pea�� rarvictar�rJ I�nrJcr_�n� arrF�it�rt��II ��c'�.�#rY� �ff��tl[]rl��m� �rY� le.`��Y��rY� rY��.'�rY ins#alled in�cc�rdan�e��+itl�apprar�ed�V�ros�r�d specifi�ati�ns. Page 18 �� -� Department of Community Development � e►��, �_ Varle � <::,,, y'w � � ,�'_.. Planning Division e , i�;. ��f � Pro osed Amendments p Fiq�a�� _7�7-�4 Example�f �uq��s�ted Decid�a��is Tree Plantir�� y 4� `� � '+� � ff� '� "�� /� .-�k{ �,F � 4'- � `�� iulch ta 1 m Lavrr�t�ke e;; ra�dius --- �#`�- - ..,�,,,x� �.�.�»' _��«-:� __� ��J=.. : Page 21 �� -� Department of Community Development � e►��, �_ Varle � <::,,, y'w � � ,�'_.. Planning Division e , i�;. r��. � � � ■ Page 7 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Planning Commission Review Meeting Date: January 12, 2012 Item: CheCk all that apply: ❑consent ❑old business ❑new business ❑public hearing � information ❑ admin.report ❑ pending legislation FILE NUMBER: CTA-06-ll AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Study Session—Amendment to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: City initiated text amendment to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC), Chapter 22110 Sign Regulations, to modify the regulations to allow a-frame signs, modify the requirements for temporary signs, increase the number of freestanding signs allowed for business on large lots fronting arterials, allow multi-family complexes to display wall signs, and require electronic signs to be equipped with an automatic dimming capability. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 17.80150 and SVMC Chapter 2120 — State Environmental Policy Act PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: None NOTICE: Notice for the proposed amendment to SVMC was placed in the Spokane Valley News Herald on January 6, 2012. Notice for the proposed amendment was provided consistent with applicable provisions of SVMC Title 17. APPROVAL CRITERIA: SVMC Section 17.80150(F)provides approval criteria for text amendments to the SVMC. The criterion stipulates that the proposed amendment(s) must be consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan and bear a substantial relation to the public health, safety,welfare, and protection of the environment. OPTIONS: A public hearing for the proposed text amendment is scheduled for January 26, 2012. STAFF CONTACT: Lori Barlow, AICP, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report Draft amendment(s)to SVMC Memo to Mike Jackson dated August 29, 2011 1of1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ��5{��, PLANNINGDIVISION �ip4�il� Vall�� STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CTA-06-11 STAFF REPORT DATE: 7anuary 4, 2012 STUny SESS�o1v DATE A1vn LocAT�o1v: January 12, 2012, beginning at 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers, Valley Redwood Plaza Building, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 101, Spokane Valley, Washington 99206. HEARING DATE: 7anuary 26, 2012 PxoPOSAL DESCx�PT�o1v: City initiated text amendment to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC), Chapter 22110 Sign Regulations, to modify the regulations to allow A-frame signs,modify the requirements for temporary signs, increase the number of freestanding signs allowed for businesses on large lots fronting arterials, allow multi-family complexes to display wall signs, and require electronic signs to be equipped with an automatic dimming capability. APPL�cANT(s): City of Spokane Valley APPxovAL C�TE�A: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Title 17 General Provisions, and Title 21 Environmental Controls. STAFF PLANNER: Lori Barlow, AICP, Senior Planner, Community Development Department REVIEwED BY: Scott Kuhta, AICP,Planning Manager, Community Development Department ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Proposed Text Amendment Exhibit 2: Memo to Mike Jackson dated August 29, 20ll A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION On July 5, 20ll staff presented an overview of the City's sign regulations to City Council. Council directed staff to conduct a comparison of the City's sign regulations to surrounding jurisdictions. At the August 15, 2011 and October 20, 20ll Council meetings staff provided a comprehensive comparison of Spokane Valley's sign regulations to the jurisdictions of Spokane, Liberty Lake, and Spokane County. While the comparison highlighted many positives about the City's sign regulations, it also identi�ed several items of concern to the Council, including: Spokane Valley is the only jurisdiction that does not allow A-frame signs, the only jurisdiction to charge for a temporary sign permit, and along with Liberty Lake, the only other jurisdiction compared that requires a temporary sign permit. Other conclusions of the review were that the varying categories of temporary sign permits and varying display time frames were confusing, and too restrictive for business; multi-family uses should be allowed wall signage; churches should have signage allowances even when in residential zones; and dimming requirements should be considered for electronic signs. As a result of the discussions, Council directed staff to initiate a code text amendment that would implement the following changes: Staff Report and Recommendation CTA-06-ll 1. Develop dimming requirements for electronic signs (lighting standards); 2. Ensure that churches are allowed reasonable signage in residential zones; 3. Allow properties along Trent and other arterials to have additional sign allowances; 4. Eliminate temporary sign fees and permits; 5. Develop regulations for the purposes of enforcement to address the following topics: a. Temporary signs should not distinquish between banners, pendants, flags, etc or special events; b. Time frames for displaying temporary signs should be increased; or c. Time frames for temporary signs should be eliminated and replaced with aesthetic standards that would determine when signs should be removed; 6. Allow A-frames or sandwich boards for businesses and real estate purposes; 7. Eliminate landscaping requirements at the base of free-standing signs on developed sites; and 8: Allow Multi-family complexes to have wall signs. The draft language implements the changes requested by Council with one exception: Item #7, freestanding sign landscaping requirements, are being addressed by separate code text amendment to the Landscaping Regulations. The following is a brief discussion regarding the proposed changes and the code section affected by the change. Dimmin� Requirements (SVMC 22110.060.B): Dimming requirements for electronic signs are accomplished by requiring the sign to have automatic dimming capability. This device adjusts the brightness of the sign to the ambient light. The brightness of the sign is a common concern and often a code requirement. Currently the City of Spokane requires verification that the dimming device is installed, while Spokane County allows staff to place additional conditions on the permit that protect adjacent property, that include lighting and location issues. Liberty Lake does not allow electronic message centers. Si�na�e for Churches in Residential Zones (SVMC Table 22-ll0-1 — Location, Hei�ht, and Co�Y Area Re�ulations): Churches are routinely classified as institutional uses, and therefore the current code would allow churches in residential zones to have wall signs, 10' high pole signs, and monument signs if the site was adj acent to an arteriaL Language is proposed that identi�es what uses are considered institutional uses in order to clarify that churches are allowed signage consistent with the intent of the code. It is also proposed to allow churches to have a monument sign in any location, not just along an arterial. However, the change as proposed affects all businesses, subdivisions, institutional uses, etc., not just churches, and allows monument signs on any site with street frontage. Height limits associated with monument signs typically result in the monument signs being used as identification signs, rather than electronic message centers utilized for advertising. Monument signs are generally unobtrusive and compatible in residential settings. Additional si�n allowances alon� Arterials (SVMC Table 22-110-1 — Location, Hei�ht, and Co�,y Area Re�ulations): The review indicated that Spokane County and Spokane increase the signage allowance for large sites in commercial and/or industrial zones. Spokane Valley's only additional sign allowance is provided to lots with more than one frontage. For example, corner lots may have two free standing signs if both street frontages are arterials. The additional sign on the second street frontage (corner lot) grants appropriate sign visibility for its passing traffic on both streets. Allowing additional freestanding signs on large lots insure that large single development sites are generally afforded the same number of signs as multiple smaller sites. This provision maintains sign equity Page 2 of 4 Staff Report and Recommendation CTA-06-ll between the larger and smaller sites. The proposed language allows additional free standing signs at a ratio of one (1) sign per 500 feet of lineal frontage. Temporary Si�ns (SVMC 22.110.050): Generally all communities regulate signs for special events— whether these signs are related to commercial enterprises (grant opening, sales, etc.) or institutional (places of worship, schools,non-profits) festivals, etc. The regulations generally include: the number of davs the signs can be displayed; the number and tvpe of advertising devices (signs, banners, balloons, etc.) that can be displayed; and their location on the property. This was consistent with all jurisdictions reviewed except for Spokane Valley, which did not stipulate number or size of temporary signs allowed. Currently the City classifies temporary signs into the following three categories: Banners; Pennants, flags, and streamers; and Special event signage. All three categories require a temporary sign permit with a fee, have varying display periods ranging from seven (7) to 60 days, but do not stipulate the number or area of temporary signs allowed to be displayed. The separate categories, with differing regulations, were confusing to the business owners, and the fee associated with the temporary sign permit was determined by the Council to be "cost prohibitive" to small business owners. Discussions with the Council highlighted conflicting concerns regarding temporary signs. The first being the cost associated with the temporary sign permit second, if the permit was eliminated how display times could be enforced. Also, since temporary signage is not intended for long term display and is subject to fading, fraying, ripping, or otherwise showing significant wear and tear, a concern was noted that unmaintained signs would be indefinitely displayed. The regulations proposed allow a single temporary sign, up to 20 sq. ft. to be displayed, so long as it is in good condition. Additional signage could be displayed for a maximum of 30 days if a temporary sign permit is obtained. This allows flexibility for business to display a single temporary sign at their discretion indefinitely, while still providing additional allowance for special events. Con�ning unlimited temporary signage to a defined 30 day period balances the business owners need for occaisional extra signage and keeps the visual clutter of signage in check to protect the area's aesthetics. A-frame Si�ns (SVMC 22110.OSO.I and K A-frame or Sandwich Board signs are commonly used by business's to attract attention. A-frame signs are not allowed in the current code since they are categorized as a portable sign. Jurisdictions typically regulate the size of the sign, and number of the signs allowed, location for display, display hours, and spacing. Size limits generally range from six (6) — nine (9) sq. ft. per side, while location is typically linked to distance from business entrance combined with controls to maintain adequate pedestrian areas. Spacing requirements prevent closely situated signs lining the public sidewalk. This can occur when each tenant within a strip mall displays a sign in front of their store front. The proposed language allows each business the opportunity to display an unlighted a-frame sign on-site, up to nine (9) sq. ft. on each side, within 12 feet of the business entrance, and during business hours only. As written, the regulation would keep the signs close to the business and prevent signage from being displayed off-site. Additionally, A- frame signs would be allowed to be used for open house/directional signage with a limit of five (5) square feet. Multi-family wall si�ns (SVMC Table 22-110-1 — Location, Hei�ht, and Co�y Area Re�ulations): The current code does not allow multi-family buildings, or apartments, to display wall signage. Multi-family development is allowed monument or freestanding signs. The review indicated that the other jurisdictions provide a small allowance for wall signs ranging from 10 — 20 sq. ft.. The proposed language would allow each multi-family building a wall sign up to 20 sq. ft. without modifying the other applicable signage requirements. B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA 1. Findings: Page 3 of 4 Staff Report and Recommendation CTA-06-ll Pursuant to SVMC Title 21 (Environmental Controls), the lead agency has determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 4321C.030(2)(c). The Planning Division expects to issue a Determination of Non-Signi�cance (DNS) for the proposal. This decision will be finalized after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. 2. Conclusion(s): The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and SVMC Title 21 will be fulfilled prior to any action taken by the city. C. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE TEXT AMENDMENT 1. Compliance with Title 17(General Provisions) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code a. Findings: SVMC 17.80150(F). Municipal Code Text Amendment Approval Criteria i. The City may approve Municipal Code Text amendment if it finds that (analysis is italicized): (1) The proposed amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. Staff Comment: The proposed amendment is consistent with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. It has no bearing on the signage standards developed for the Aesthetic Corridors, and maintains the intent of the code by minimizing sign clutter while allowing adequate signage for business. This is accomplished by allowing more discretionary use of temporary signs, but limiting the number of signs allowed to be displayed to a single sign unless otherwise permitted. Below are the relevant policies fi^om the Comprehensive Plan: LUP-14.2: Adopt specific regulations for designated aesthetic corridors that: • Provide incentives for aesthetic design; • Require landscaping buffers adjacent to roadways; • Limit sign height and size; • Provide performance standards to adequately screen intensive land uses that have exterior clutter such as outdoor storage, exterior heavy equipment and/or exterior fabricationlassembly. • Prohibit off-premise signage and billboards LUP-14.3: Establish standards for the scale and intensity of commercial, retail and industrial signage that protect views and minimize signage clutter while allowing adequate business identification. (2) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment Staff Comment: Public health, safety and welfare are furthered by providing sign regulations that respect the purposes of signs fi^om the perspective of the community and business. The amendment recognizes business need to advertise, while preserving an attractive commercial environment for the public. . Page 4 of 4 �{I l�t (]F �(��n� From the Community Development Department Val�.�� Interoffice Memorandum To: Mike Jackson, City Manager From: Lori Barlow,Senior Planner CC: Scott Kuhta,Planning Manager; John Hohman,Director Date: August 4,2011; Revised August 29,2011 Re: Sign Regulations Comparison Review This memo provides information to the City Council regarding the current sign regulations applicable to the city's non-residential zoning districts, and compares the regulations to the adjacent jurisdictions that include the City of Spokane and Liberty Lake. The memo has been revised to include Spokane County in the comparison. The original information reviewed compared prohibited signage, permit requirements, sign standards, and planning review fees. At the request of City Council the review also includes building permit fees, landscaping requirements for freestanding signs, and institution and multi-family sign allowances in residential zones. Last, the direction provided thus far by Council to Staff at the August 15tn Meeting has been summarized. The purpose of this review is to assist the City Council to determine if sign code revisions should be initiated. Overview Chapter 22.110, Sign Regulations of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) regulates permanent, temporary, and portable signs. The Chapter addresses all aspects of signage including signs in both residential and non-residential areas, prohibited signs, general regulations, location and setbacks, permitting requirements, sign area calculations, billboards, non-conforming signs, and maintenance. The information provided in this memo does not consider regulations applicable to signs in residential zones (except for institutional and multi- family uses), master sign plans, aesthetic corridors, nonconforming signs, or billboards. Instead, the focus is on the most common sign types and relevant regulations that affect local businesses. All referenced information is contained in the attached tables. Signage is defined by the SVMC as: A visual communication device, structure, or fixture, which is visible from any right-of-way and is intended to aid in promoting the sale of products, goods, services, events, or to ident� a building using graphics, letters, figures, symbols, Memo to City Manager Sign Compaiison Memo August 4,2011;Revised August 29,2011 Page 2 of 9 trademarks, or written copies. It is further defined to include any board, poster, placard, banner, flag, pennant, streamer, or similar structure, electronic or otherwise which is constructed, placed, attached, painted or fastened, in any manner for the purpose of attracting attention of the public to any place,person, entity, or business. Summarv Conclusions Based on the comparison of the code requirements reviewed for the three jurisdictions, the following general conclusions can be made: 1. The Ciry of Spokane Valley is fairly consistent with the adjacent jurisdictions in the types of signs that are prohibited. One significant difference is that Liberty Lake, Spokane, and Spokane County either allow, or are processing a code text amendment to allow, sandwich boards or A-frame Signs. 2. The City of Spokane Valley requires fewer temporary sign permits than Liberty Lake, but more than Spokane and Spokane County. Spokane and Spokane County do not require temporary sign permits except that Spokane requires notice of A-frame signs be provided to the city. 3. The Ciry of Spokane Valley and Spokane County provides the largest wall sign area allowance out of the jurisdictions compared. 4. Spokane Valley and Spokane County allow freestanding signs in all non-residential zoning districts if standards are met. The Ciry of Liberty Lake and Spokane limit the zoning districts that allow freestanding signs. 5. Spokane Valley allows a greater freestanding sign area than Spokane Counry for businesses in general since the standards do not change between commercial or industrial zones. Spokane County reduces the freestanding sign area for industrial zoned properties. 6. Spokane Valley and Liberry Lake limit free standing signs to 1 per arterial frontage; Spokane and Spokane County limit the number of freestanding signs based on a street frontage ratio. Larger parcels may be allowed additional freestanding signs. 7. Spokane Valley allows a greater monument sign area than the other jurisdictions compared for small single business sites. 8. Spokane Valley has more categories of temporary signage than the other jurisdictions reviewed and results in more temporary sign area allowed than the other jurisdictions. However, the regulations are confusing to the public. 9. With the exception of temporary signs, planning review fees charged by the City of Spokane Valley are generally consistent with Spokane and the County. Liberty Lake does not charge a planning review fee. 10. Spokane Valley is the only jurisdiction out of the four compared that charges a fee for temporary signs. 11. Generally Spokane Valley's Building Permit Review Fee is less than Liberty Lake and Spokane, and significantly less than Spokane Counry's Building Permit Review Fees. 12. Spokane Valley's requirement for landscaping at the base of freestanding signs for new development and existing development is consistent with Liberty Lake and Spokane Memo to City Manager Sign Compaiison Memo August 4,2011;Revised August 29,2011 Page 3 of 9 Counry, with the exception that the County mav not require landscaping for signs proposed within existing development; Spokane has no landscaping requirement associated with signs. 13. Spokane Valley is the only jurisdiction that does not allow wall signs on multi-family buildings, but by far allows the largest wall sign area for institutional uses. Review ancl Analvsis The following sections provide a comparison of the applicable regulations by jurisdiction. The attached tables provide more detailed information regarding the regulations. In some cases regulations have been generalized in order to make the comparison. This was necessary primarily when reviewing permanent signage regulations since the City of Spokane has many commercial zoning districts with differing sign regulations. Prohibited Si�ns Prohibited signs are those signs that are not allowed under any circumstances within each jurisdiction. Table 1 (see attached) identifies the signs prohibited within each jurisdiction. As noted in the general conclusions, Spokane Valley is less restrictive than Liberty Lake, and fairly consistent with Spokane and Spokane County when comparing the sign types that are prohibited. All jurisdictions prohibit flashing signs, portable readerboard signs, signs on vehicle trailers, and off-premise signage. Spokane and Spokane County allows A-frame signs, if criteria are met, and Liberty Lake is currently considering a comprehensive plan amendment that would allow A-frame signs. Currently Liberty Lake only allows A-frame signs for real estate purposes, such as open house advertising. Spokane Valley allows electronically changeable message signs, roof signs, video boards and temporary inflatable signs. Liberty Lake and Spokane County prohibits video boards and roof signs; Spokane allows roof signs in the Central Business District (CBD) zone. Billboards are prohibited in all four jurisdictions. However, Spokane Valley allows existing billboards to be replaced with a structure and copy area that is equal or smaller in size within the mixed use and nonresidential zoning districts. Criteria, such as spacing requirements, limits new billboard location in order to avoid having billboards clustered within concentrated areas. The Ciry has an inventory of existing billboards, which includes location, height, dimensions, and the date that the sign was erected. Permits Repuired Staff also compared the jurisdictions to determine which sign types require permits (See Attached Table 2). Generally speaking, jurisdictions have two types of sign permits: A Sign Permit, which is a building permit, is required for all permanently mounted signage. A Temporary Sign Permit is required for signs intended to be temporarily displayed and then removed, and generally not constructed of long lasting materials. Temporary Signs are approved over the counter by Spokane Valley staff. Each jurisdiction differs in the type of sign that require permits, with one exception: All jurisdictions require a sign permit for any permanently mounted signs. Signs that require a building permit include wall signs, freestanding or pole signs, and monument signs. The requirement for temporary sign permits varies greatly from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Liberry Lake requires a temporary sign permit for almost all forms of temporary signs, Memo to City Manager Sign Compaiison Memo August 4,2011;Revised August 29,2011 Page 4 of 9 including real estate and political signs. However, staff at Liberty Lake indicated that at this time due to staff cuts, this requirement is often not enforced. Spokane and Spokane County do not require temporary sign permits for any type of temporary signage. Both jurisdictions do have code sections that identify standards associated with most categories of signage including real estate and political signs. Spokane has one exception to the "No Permit Requirement" - A-frame signs require that notice be provided to the city, which includes, among other items, written acknowledgement of the requirements applicable to the sign use. Spokane County's regulations indicate that approval from the Planning and Building Division is required. However, according to County staff, temporary signs are displayed without any approval from the Planning and Building Division whatsoever. Spokane Valley requires a temporary sign permit for all types of temporary advertising signage that include banners, pennants, flags and streamers with copy, inflatables and other types of special event signage. In comparison to Liberty Lake, Spokane Valley does not require temporary sign permits for signage not geared toward sales, such as pennants and streamers without copy, political signs, or flags. None of the jurisdictions require permits for directional signs or name plates so long as they remain within the limits noted per jurisdiction. Table #2 identifies the sign type and notes if a permit is required by the individual jurisdiction. Comparison of Standards (Area, Hei�ht, Number of Si�ns Allowed) The standards for all sign categories were reviewed(See Attached Tables 3 and 4). The review compared maximum sign area, number of signs allowed, and height standards when applicable. The review of Temporary Signs included the same standards, but also took into consideration any time periods associated with their display. The comparisons are discussed below. Permanent Si�ns: The three categories of permanent signs are Wall Signs, Pole Signs and Monument Signs. This discussion considers the individual sign categories separately. (See Attached Table 3) Wall Si�ns: Spokane Valley and Spokane Counry allow up to 25% of the wall area as the maximum wall sign area. This is the largest allowance out of the jurisdictions compared. Spokane and Liberty Lake limit the maximum area to either 10% or 15%. All jurisdictions apply the wall sign area standard uniformly in that persons may have as many signs as they choose, so long as the area does not exceed the maximum area allowed. Wall sign area allowed has not been an issue in Spokane Valley. Freestandin� Si�ns: It is difficult to compare freestanding sign standards between jurisdictions, primarily because Spokane has many commercial zoning districts with different standards applicable. Generally, all jurisdictions allow a minimum of one Pole sign per parcel in the districts that allow Pole Si n�s. Spokane Valley, Spokane, and Spokane County allow one sign per arterial frontage; Liberty Lake onlv allows Pole Signs on properties along the I-90 corridor or within the interchange area. Spokane allows pole signs in most commercial zones and all industrial zones and allows signs based on lineal frontage, i.e. 1 sign per 300' lineal frontage. Spokane County is similar to Spokane, except that multiple businesses sites may have 1 sign per 500' of lineal frontage. Height limits for all jurisdictions generally range from 20' to 40' with higher limits, ranging from 50' to 60', established for freeway areas. Spokane Valley allows 30' for single business, with additional height allowed for multi-business complexes up to 40'. Maximum area allowed Memo to City Manager Sign Compaiison Memo August 4,2011;Revised August 29,2011 Page 5 of 9 per sign varies considerably since different allocation standards are utilized. Spokane Valley and Spokane County allow 100 to 200 square feet for single business depending on the lineal frontage a site has; Spokane Valley allows up to 250 square feet for freeway properties and multi-business complexes. Spokane bases the area allowed on linear frontage and number of businesses not to exceed 150 square feet, with the exception of their CBD area, where 250 square feet is allowed. Spokane County is similar to Spokane Valley by allowing 100 to 200 square feet of signage area relative to street frontage in commercial zones, but allows 40 — 80 square feet relative to frontage in industrial zones. Monument Si_gns: Monument Signs are allowed in all commercial and industrial zoning districts per jurisdiction. The number of signs allowed varies from 1 per parcel, 1 per building, 2 per street frontage, or 2 per each 500' of lineal frontage. Liberty Lake allows minimally 1 monument sign in addition to a pole sign in the freeway areas. Spokane Valley limits the monument signs to the maximum number of signs allowed for either pole signs or monument signs. Spokane County allows a greater number of monument signs compared to pole signs as an incentive to encourage business to utilize monument signs rather than pole signs. The area allowed varies from as little as 15 square feet in Spokane, up to 90 square feet in Spokane Valley and Spokane County. Spokane Valley and Liberty Lake provide additional area for multi-business complexes, ranging from 75 square feet up to 150 square feet, while Spokane County provides additional signage for multi-business complexes related to lot frontage. Spokane Valley allows the greatest area for single business and multi-business complexes in a single sign, but Spokane County's ratio approach for signage could result in more signs, with more total frontage on large sites. Temporary Si�ns: The most common type of Temporary Signs are banners, pennants, flags, streamers, inflatable or balloon signs, real estate signs, political signs, construction signs, and A-frames. Each jurisdiction regulates the signs through different classifications. For example, Spokane Valley calls out banners as a separate temporary sign rype, while Spokane only allows banners as part of grand opening or special event signage. Both Spokane and Liberty Lake have detailed regulations for real estate, construction, and political signs. However, regulation of these sign types has not been an issue for Spokane Valley, and therefore the discussion will focus on banners, pennants, special event signage and A-frame signs. Table 4 identifies the area and time limits associated with the temporary signs discussed(See Attached Table 4). Banners: Spokane Valley allows banners for a 30 day period, twice per year, compared to 30 days per quarter in Spokane County, and a single 30 day period in the other two jurisdictions. Spokane and Liberty Lake only allow banners associated with grand openings or special events. Liberty Lake has a maximum area of 75 square feet. The other jurisdictions have no maximum area limits. Spokane Counry permits a single banner, while Spokane Valley permits an unlimited number for that 30 day period. Pennants, fla�s, and streamers: Spokane Valley allows this signage to be displayed for up to 60 days, twice per year. The 60 days for pennants, flags, etc, is in addition to the 30 days for the banners, and special event signage allowance. Spokane and Liberty Lake only allow this signage in association with grand openings or special events. Spokane Counry allows a banner or pennants flags and streamers for 30 days each quarter. Memo to City Manager Sign Compaiison Memo August 4,2011;Revised August 29,2011 Page 6 of 9 Special Event Si_gnage: As noted above, Spokane and Liberty Lake allow temporary signage when associated with grand openings and special events. Both jurisdictions allow 30 days to display the signage. Other parameters on special event signage include area limits ranging from 20 — 75 square feet of signage, and height limits for balloon signs not to exceed 25'. Spokane County treats all temporary banners, flags, pennants the same and does not provide additional opportuniry beyond the 30 days per quarter as noted above. Spokane Valley allows special event signage for 7 day periods, 4 times per year, with no limits on number of signs, or sign area. A-frame or Sandwich Board Si_-�ns: Spokane Valley does not allow this rype of signage. Currently regulations in Liberty Lake allow this signage type only for real estate purpose. The height limit is 3' and maximum area is 5 sq. ft.. Spokane County and Ciry of Spokane both allow A-frame signs so long as they do not exceed a maximum area of 9 sq. ft. Spokane has additional requirements that include a height limit of 3', hours of use, and placement within 12' of the business entrance. As previously mentioned Spokane does not require temporary sign permits. However, a sandwich board sign does require notification to the City and an acknowledgement of the applicable rules. Fee Comparison The review also included the Planning fees and Building fees charged by each jurisdiction (See Attached Table 5). Planning Review fees are separate from the Building Permit Fees charged for permanent signage. Planning Review Fees for permanent signage ranges from $50.00 to �$60.00 for all jurisdictions, with the exception that Liberty Lake does not have a separate planning review fee. Spokane Valley is the only jurisdiction that charges a planning review fee for Temporary Signs. The fee is $50.00. Table 4 identifies the fees charged by each jurisdiction for the various sign types. Building Permit Fees for permanent signage vary significantly due to additional charges that are applied per jurisdiction. Generally, the fees range from $30.00 up to $75.00 for wall signs and from $68.00 up to $321.26 for freestanding signs. However, Spokane has a $25.00 processing fee that is added to each permit, while the County adds an inspection fee that ranges from $128.66 up to $192.99 per sign. Spokane Valley does not charge an inspection fee or a processing fee and therefore results in the lowest building permit fee charged by the jurisdictions compared, and significantly less than Spokane County. According to the Spokane County 20ll Fee Schedule, their fees are based on the actual average cost to the Building Department to process permits, review plans and perform inspections. This applies to all construction permits, not just signs. This is presumed to explain why their fees are significantly higher. Si�n Permit Process: During the August 15th meeting, Council members asked for clarification on the sign permit process, including length of time for review, number of signs included in a permit and clarification of engineering sign requirements. As noted above temporary signs are reviewed by the Planning Division only, and approved as an over the counter permit. Wall signs and freestanding signs are reviewed by the Building Division and the Planning Division. Upon application, permits are first given to the Building Division. Generally, the permit is reviewed by the Senior Plans Examiner within the same week of submittal, and then passed on to the Memo to City Manager Sign Compaiison Memo August 4,2011;Revised August 29,2011 Page 7 of 9 Planning Division for review and approval. Planners generally review sign permits the same day received. However, the review may take longer, if additional information is required. Permits may include numerous signs per building, and more than one freestanding sign on the site. Building permit fees are charged per sign. However, signage for separate buildings, even if on the same site, requires separate permit applications. See Table 5 for fee amounts as discussed above. As mentioned at the meeting, freestanding signs greater than 6' in height must be engineered. This requirement originates from the International Building Code. The sign application is being updated to reflect this requirement in order to inform applicants. Landscanin�Repuirements for Si�ns At the August 15th meeting Council also requested information regarding landscaping requirements for freestanding signs. All four jurisdictions were reviewed to identify landscaping standards, and it appears that all four jurisdictions deal with the landscaping requirement differently. Spokane Valley's current regulations identify landscaping requirements for two development conditions: New freestanding signs in new development, and new freestanding signs proposed in existing developments. Liberty Lake and Spokane County both require all freestanding signs to be placed in "maintained landscaped" areas. The difference is in how the regulation is implemented. Spokane County doesn't require new landscaping for the sign, the requirement is that the sign be placed within a landscaped area if landscaping were required for the site. Liberty Lake requires landscaping at the base, so the sign may be placed in a landscaped area, or landscaping must be provided. Spokane, in contrast, does not require landscaping in association with signage. Table 6 identifies the regulations by jurisdiction. The issue of landscaping at the base of signs was previously discussed with council, and staff was directed to propose a code text amendment eliminating landscaping at the base of signage proposed on developed sites. Staff is currently working on the development of a number of code text amendments to Chapter 22.70 Fencing, Screening, and Landscaping which will be brought to Council for review and approval following Planning Commission Review. Si�n in Residential Zones for Institutional and Multi-familv Uses Sign standards for Institutional and Multi-family uses were reviewed for each of the jurisdictions. All four jurisdictions establish standards for institutional rype uses. Spokane Valley and Spokane provide general standards for all institutional uses, and separate standards for multi-family uses, while Liberty Lake and Spokane County provide standards that further break down the institutional category into semi-public (churches, multi-family and child care, etc.) and schools/public (schools, and all public uses). Institutional uses are generally defined as establishments or organizations that are associated with public, education, or charitable causes or programs. Additionally, each jurisdiction has separate standards for each of the sign categories (wall, freestanding, and monument signs.) Table 7 identifies the specific standards for each sign type in each category. Wall siQns The City of Spokane Valley has the least restrictive wall sign allowance for institutional uses, and the most restrictive regulations for multi-family wall signs, since no wall signs are allowed Memo to City Manager Sign Compaiison Memo August 4,2011;Revised August 29,2011 Page 8 of 9 for multi-family uses. Spokane Valley allows up to 25% of the wall area for institutional uses, while Liberty Lake and Spokane Counry limit the maximum area from 20 sq. ft. up to 32 sq. ft. Spokane's maximum sign area allowed is 50 sq. ft., but may be smaller since the area is linked to the ratio of the building wall length. Wall sign area for multi-family complexes are limited to 1 sign per building with maximum area ranging from 10 sq. ft. up to 20 sq. ft. Free standin� siQns The comparison of the freestanding sign regulations for multi-family and institutional uses indicates that Spokane Valley's regulations provide the largest area for multi-family free standing signage, and a height limit that is not exceeded by any of the jurisdictions. Liberty Lake does not allow freestanding signs for multi-family uses or institutional uses. Spokane Valley's maximum sign area for institutional uses is consistent with Spokane County, and slightly less than Spokane. The height limits range from 10' up to 20', with Spokane Valley having the lowest maximum height. Monument Si�ns The comparison of monument sign regulations is similar to the freestanding sign regulations for multi-family and institutional uses in that Spokane Valley provides the largest area for signage and the tallest height allowance, with one exception - Spokane County provides an area bonus if a monument sign is kept under 7' in height. Council Direction At the August 15th City Council Meeting, Council members noted sign regulation items that should be revised during the discussion. While staff anticipates that this list will continue to evolve with Council discussion, the following items will be clarified with the Council to determine which items will move forward as a code text amendment: 1. Develop dimming requirements for electronic signs (lighting standards); 2. Ensure that churches are allowed reasonable signage in residential zones; 3. Properties along Trent and other arterials should have additional sign allowances; 4. Temporary sign fees and permits should be eliminated; 5. Regulations for the purposes of enforcement should be developed that address the following topics: a. Temporary signs should not distinguish between banners, pendants, flags, etc or special events; b. Time frames for displaying temporary signs should be increased; or c. Time frames for temporary signs should be eliminated and replaced with aesthetic standards that would determine when signs should be removed; 6. A-frames or sandwich boards should be allowed for businesses and real estate purposes; 7. Eliminate landscaping requirements at the base of free-standing signs on developed sites; Items that the Council noted that fall outside of the scope of the Planning Division include: l. Limit the rype of code compliance complaints that may be filed by citizens. i.e. no anonymous complaints. Memo to City Manager Sign Compaiison Memo August 4,2011;Revised August 29,2011 Page 9 of 9 Please let me know if you would like additional information. Sign Regulations Comparison Tables Table 1 Prohibited Signs By Jurisdiction Note: RevisedAugust24,2011 Sign Type Spokane Liberty Spokane Spokane Valle Lake Countv Flashine Siais Q Q Q Portable Si s(incli�des readerboards and fl frame signs) Readerboasds C�I C�I C�I C�I A-frames C�I C�I exceptA- fi�ame signs are allowed for�eal estate pixrposes> than 6 s .t.** Si s on Vehicle Traileis C�I C�I C�I C�I Billboards—(Note-Exisfing Billboards are non-conforming and allowed fio Q Q Q Q remain� Off Premises Si s C�I C�I** C�I C�I Electronically changeable message signs (freestanding) C�I Roof signs Q Allowed in the Q CBD zone onl . Video Boards C�I C�I Inflatable Signs or pertnanent balloon signs C�I C�I Note: Pennanent Balloon signs not allowed. Temporary inflatable signs only. **Note: The City of Liberty Lake is cuirently processing a code text amendment that would allow A-frame signs up to a ma�mum of 3'height and 6 sq.ft.of area and is also prohibiting off premise signage. August 15,2011; Revised August 24,20ll Page 1 Sign Regulations Comparison Tables Table 2 Sign Permits Required by Sign Type and lurisdiction Revised on August 24,2011 Sign Type Spokane Liberty Spokane Spokane County Valley Lake Wall Signs Q Q Q Q Free Standing or Q Q Q Q Pole Signs Monument Signs Q Q Q Q Banners(TemporarySign) QTS QTS NR NR Pennants,flags,and streamers with copy QTS QTS NR NR Special Event Signage(including search lights& QTS QTS NR NR inflatables) Temporary Commercial Signs(i.e.Construction,for NR QTS NR NR sale orlease) A-Frame Signs or Sandwich Boards Prohibited QTS NR—However notice NR to City is required acknowledging the requirements Electronic Signs Q Prohibited Q Q Official Signs NR NR NR NR National and State Flags; Flags of political sub- NR NR NR NR divisions; Symbolic flags of non-profit institutions Notice Signs;Legal Notices NR NR NR NR Pennants and Streamers w/o advertising copy; NR QTS NR NR Barber Poles:Seasonal Decorations associated w/ national,local or religious holiday Political signs for candidates or ballots NR Q TS NR Name Plates<4'sq.feet in area NR NR NR<2 sq.ft. NR Directional Signs<4'sq.feet in area NR NR NR<3 sq.ft NR TS=Temporary Sign Permit NR=Not Required August 15,2011; Revised August 24,20ll Page 2 Sign Regulations Comparison Tables Table 3 Location and Height Requirements for Permanent Signs in Commercial Zones Comparison by Jurisdiction Spokane Valley Liberty Lake Spokane Spokane County Wall Signs Number per No limit-may not exceed No limit—may not exceed No limit-may not exceed No limit-may not exceed wall maximum area maximum area. max area(except in CC4 zone) maximum area. Area 25%of wall area per building 1 sq.ft./10 sq.ft.of wall up 1.0-1.5 sq.ft.per 10 sq.ft. 25%of the total wall area or to a max.of 150 sq.ft.; I-90 of primary bldg wall or 15% 250 sq.ft.max per sign, properties-300 sq.ft.max.; of the primary building wall whichever is smaller.;Multi Director may increase wall whichever is greater; CC2 business complex,each area allowance if no other and CB(2)allow 1.5 sq.ft.of business is allowed a 250 sq. signage is proposed. primary bldg wall if no ft.sign so long as the total of freestanding signage exists all wall signs does not exceed 25%of the wall area. Max.area None 150 sq.ft;300 sq.ft.in I-90 15 sq.ft in CCR;50-100 sq.ft 250 sq.ft. per sign properties. other zones;and 250 sq.in CBD zones Free Vote: a combinafron of free- Note: Only allowed along I-90 Note-Pole sigras are not allowed Note: Sites that are allowed Standing standing and moniEment si,gras corridor. (M-2, G2, P zones) in all commercial zones- in that more than 1 free standing si,gra Signs may nofi exceed the limit per Desigra standards apply. case a monzrment si,gra is musfi provide a 500' separafron parcel of either sign type. allowed,� and fi�eestanding signs between signs. are not allowed if a projecting sign�eists or wall signage is<1 sq.ft.to 1 ft.ofbzxilding wall. Number per 1 per arterial street frontage 1 freestanding sign if along I- Varies by zone district: Single Business-1 per site: parcel 90 corridor and 1 monument 1/arterial street frontage;or additional signs are allowed if sign along access street per 1/300 ft of arterial street the site has multiple arterial parcel for single business frontage and 1 for each frontages additional 300 ft of frontage. Multi-Business—1 per 500'of frontage in all commercial and industrial zones,except NC. Height Single Business 30' Varies by zone district: 20- Varies by zone district: 20'or Multi-Business 40' 30' 35'; 60'in CBD-5 zone; No 30`; no height allowance Freeway 50' height allowance for multi- provided for multi-business business sites. sites. August 15,2011; Revised August 24,20ll Page 3 Sign Regulations Comparison Tables Table 3 Location and Height Requirements for Permanent Signs in Commercial Zones Comparison by Jurisdiction Spokane Valley Liberty Lake Spokane Spokane County Area Single Business-100 sq.ft.or 1 sq.ft.per 1 ft.of arterial or 50 sq.ft.-100 sq.ft. in 200 sq.ft.for lots with > 150 sq.ft.—250 sq.ft. local street frontage;or 50 to Neighborhood Com; 100'of frontage 75'with an additional 25 sq. 100 sq.ft.or 200 sq.ft.for Multi-Business and Freeway ft.for each additional lots with>100'street frontage -250 sq.ft. business not to exceed in other commercial zones;40 150sq.ft.;250sq.ft.in CBD, sq.ft.or 80 sq.ft for lots with GC,and Industrial zones >than 100'of frontage in industrial zones. The maximum amount is allowed for multi-business sites in all zones. Monument Note:the totol of free-standing Only allowed in M-1,M-2,M- Note: Monument Signs ore not Note: Monument signs moy be Signs and monument signs may not 3,C-1,C-2,I,P,O zones allowed if a projecting sign substituted for free standing signs exceed the limit per parcel of already exists or if wall signage —sites may not have both sign eithersign type. exceeds 1 sq.ft.to 1 ft.of lineal types,with the exceptions that an building wall. industrial park may have 1 entrance/identification monument sign. Number per 2 per street frontage Single Business-1/parcel; Varies by district-1 per Varies by district: 1-2 per parcel Multi Bus.—1/street frontage building or 1 per arterial site(Neighborhood com.);2 street frontage per each 500'of street frontage(other commercial and industrial zones) Height Single Business -7' 8.5' S' 7' Multi-Business -7' Area(sq.ft.) Single Bus. 90 sq ft. Single Business-50—75' Varies by district-15-50 sq. 75 sq.ft. Neighborhood com; Multi-Bus.150 sq.ft. Multiple Business-75-100' ft and 90 sq.ft. other non residential zones. August 15,2011; Revised August 24,20ll Page 4 Sign Regulations Comparison Tables Table 4 Temporary Sign Location and Height Requirements in Commercial Zones Comparison by Jurisdiction Spokane Valley Liberty Lake Spokane Spokane County Banners 30 days per year;1 Banners,pennants,flags,and streamers Banners,pennants,flags,and A single banner,flags, renewal allowed are all regulated the same. streamers are only allowed in pennants,searchlights or Pennants, 60 days with 1 - 30 days per year and 75 sq.ft. associated with Grand Opening Inflatable are allowed for flags,and renewal or an maximum;except properties in Displays or Special Event Signage. 30 days/quarter. streamers annual 75 day I-90 corridor allowed 150 sq.ft. See Below: Approval from the County permit max. is required. Special event 7 days duration;not See above Grand Opening Displays: 30 days See above—no special signage more than 4 special prior to event—no maximum area regulations for special event permits per or height limits. event. year Special Event:30 days prior- limited to 20 sq.ft.area maximum with no height limits. Balloon signs: limited to 30 days— 2x year; Vertical height limit is 25' and no max.area Temporary on- Construction Signs: Construction Sign: 1 sign/construction Construction Signs: commercial Construction signs: 40 sq. premise 16 sq.ft.max area site,limited to 32 sq.ft.and 6'height; zones-limited to 32 sq.ft. and 10' ft.max.;10'height limit. commercial and limited to 7'in Real Estate Wall Signs: area limited to 1 in height Real Estate: 32 sq.ft. signs height; no TS sq.ft./10 sq.ft of wall. Real Estate Signs— Limits range max.and 10'height limit. permit required Real Estate Free-standing Commercial generally from 1 per street Open house/directional signs:1 sign/frontage;16'sq.ft.area frontage up to 5 sq.ft.and 7' signs: 5 sq.ft.and 3'high max.6'height max. height; max;1 per each access street. A-Frame or Not Allowed Currently allowed only for real estate One Sign per business-Limited to 9 Max area of 9 sq.ft. Sandwich uses i.e.Open Houses; Proposed rules sq.ft.area and 3'height;displayed Board Signs would allow A-board signs up to 6'sq.ft. during business hours; located area and 3'height for limited commercial within 12'of entrance uses. Permanent Allowed;included in permanent Banners signage square footage consistent w/projecting signs and fascia August 15,2011; Revised August 24,20ll Page 5 Sign Regulations Comparison Tables Table 5 Comparison of Planning And Building Sign Fees by Jurisdiction and Sign Type Sign Type Spokane Valley Liberty Lake Spokane Spokane County Planning/Building Fees Planning/Building Fees Planning/Building Fees Planning/Building Fees Wall Signs $50.00/$48.00 per sign No Fee/$75.00 $50.00/$30.00+ 59.27/$52.16+ $25.00 processing fee $128.66 inspection fee Free Standing Signs $50.00/$68.00 per sign No Fee/$115.00 $50.00/$75.00+ 59.27/321.26+192.99 $25.00 processing fee inspection fee Monuments $50.00/$68.00 per sign No Fee/$115.00 $50.00/$75.00+ 59.27 $25.00 processing fee Temporary Signs $50.00/No fee No Fee/No fee No Fee—No Permit No Fee /No Fee Required Note: The fees do not include State Surcharge Fees or Electrical fees for lighted signs. Table 6 Landscaping Requirements at the Base of Free Standing Signs by Jurisdiction Development Spokane Valley Liberty Lake Spokane Spokane County Type New New free-standing sign structures in new All freestanding No landscaping All free standing and Development development shall provide landscaping at the and monument requirements monument signs base. Area required varies based on sign signs required related to signage shall be located in a structure and can range from 32 sq.ft.for single to be placed in a for new required landscape pole sign to 60 sq.ft.for multiple pole structure. maintained development or area if landscapin�is Existing No additional landscaping is required for new landscaped existing required as part of Development signs in development that meet current area. development. the development landscaping requirements; or proposal. New sign structures on fully developed site require minimal xeriscaping. August 15,2011; Revised August 24,20ll Page 6 Sign Regulations Comparison Tables Table 7 Sign Standards for Multi family Complexes and Institutional Uses in Residential zones by Jurisdiction Sign Type Spokane Valley Liberty Lake Spokane Spokane County Wall Signs Multi-family or No wall signs 1 sign up to 10 sq.ft. 1 per building up 15 sq.ft. 1 sign up to 20 sq.ft. Semi-Public allowed Institutional or Max.area 25%of 1 sign up to 20 sq.ft. 1 sq.ft.pe1`of primary building 1 sign up to 32 sq.ft. Schools/Public wall wall if free-standing sign is present or 1.5 sq.ft.per primary building wall if no freestanding sign exists;50 sq.ft.max per sign FPeeStelldlllg Note: Syokane allows 1 wall sign or 1 SIg115 freestanding sign for multi family eom leees. Multi-family or Multi-family and Not allowed 1 per building up to 15 sq.ft.and 1 sign allowed;16 sq.ft Semi-Public Institutional: 1 free 10'height. and 6'height maximum standing sign per Institutional or arterial frontage;10' Not allowed 1 sign/street frontage; area is 1 sign allowed;32 sq.ft. Schools/Public height and 32 sq.ft. limited to 1 sq.ft per linear street and 15'height maximum. max area allowed. frontage or 50 sq.ft.area and 20' height limit Monument Signs Multi-family or Same as for free 1 sign allowed;16 sq. Same as for free standing signs Same as above,except Semi-Public standing signs ft and 6'height maximum sign area may maximum be increased to 60 sq.ft Institutional or 1 sign allowed;32 sq. for monument signs 7'or Schools/Public ft.and 6'maximum. less in height Notes Liberty Lake and Spokane County categorize uses by Semi-Public or Schools/Public uses. Spokane Valley and Spokane categorize by Multi-family or Institutional uses. Semi-public includes churches,multi-family,and child day care centers,etc.; School/Public uses includes schools,and all public uses August 15,2011; Revised August 24,20ll Page 7 PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 22.110 SIGN � Chapter 22.110 F. Signs attached to or placed on a vehicle or SIGN REGULATIONS trailer parked on public or private property; provided,that this provision shall not be construed as prohibiting the identification of a Sections: business or its product on a vehicle operating 22.110.010 Purpose,intent and scope. during the normal course of business; 22110.020 Prohibited signs. 22.110.030 Permit required. G. Signs obstructing visibility within any 22.110.040 Number,general regulations clearview triangle as established in Chapter for permitted permanent 22.'70 SVMC; signs. 22.110.050 Permitted temporary signs. H. Billboards except when permitted as provided 22110.060 General provisions in SVMC 22110130; applicable to all signs. 22.110.070 Comprehensive sign plan. L Off-premises signs; 22110.080 Aesthetic corridors. 22.110.090 Sign location and front J. Temporary signs unless specifically allowed setbacks. pursuant to SVMC 22110.050; 22110100 Sign area calculation. 22.110.110 Maintenance of signs. K Abandoned signs and sign structures. (Ord. 22110120 Existing nonconforming 07-015 § 4, 2007). signs. 22.110.130 Billboards. 22.110.030 Permit required. A. Other than for those uses listed in subsection B of this section, a sign permit is required for all 22.110.010 Purpose,intent and scope. allowed permanent signs, temporary signs, Signage regulations are intended to promote unless otherwise specified, and billboards. commerce, traffic safety and community identity while improving the visual environment of B.Permits are not required for on-premises residential, commercial and industrial areas. official signs; seasonal decorations;merchandise This code regulates permanent, temporary, and displays;point-of-purchase advertising displays; portable signs. (Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007). national and state flags; flags of a political subdivision;notice signs,pennants and 22.110.020 Prohibited signs. streamers without advertising copy; symbolic The following signs are prohibited: flags of nonprofit institutions dedicated to public service; legal notices required by law; barber A. Signs which by coloring, shape,wording or poles; historic site designations; commemorative location resemble or conflict with traffic control monuments/plaques; gravestones; advertising signs or devices; copy affixed to phone booths; donation and recycling containers; lettering or symbols B. Signs that create a safety hazard for applied directly onto or flush-mounted pedestrian or vehicular traffic; magnetically to a motor vehicle operating in the normal course of business;political signs C. Flashing signs; supporting political issues, candidates or ballot measures; replacement of copy on signs D.Portable signs; except A-frame si�ns otherwise permitted; name plates with less than specifically allowed pursuant to 22110.OSO.I. four square feet of copy area; directional signs with less than four square feet of copy area; and E. Signs located within the public right-of-way, murals containing no copy. except official signs and except bus benches placed pursuant to an agreement with the City; Page 1 of 8 Planning Commission Study Session -January 12, 2012 CTA 06-ll C.Permit applications shall include a site plan 7. Tax parcel number where proposed that provides the following information: sign will be located. (Ord. 09-010 § 1, 2009; Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007). 1. The location of the affected lot, building(s) and sign(s); 2. The scale of the site plan; 22.110.040 Number, general regulations for 3. A scaled drawing of the proposed permitted permanent signs. sign or sign revision,including size, height, copy, structural footing details, A. Permitted permanent signs shall comply with method of attachment and illumination; the requirements of Table 22110-1.No more 4. The location of all e�sting signs on than the ma�mum numbers of either the site including size and height freestanding pole signs or monument sign 5. For signs subject to spacing structures are allowed per parcel. regulations, the location of neighboring signs on adj acent properties; 6. Approved sign plan,if applicable; and Page 2 of 8 Planning Commission Study Session -January 12, 2012 CTA 06-11 Table 22.110-1—Location,Height and Copy Area Requirements Maximum ,-, w � r..� .. 0 °� ° �l +� u Land Use Zoning District � � �o �o � � Additional Provisions i, � �� ^J s�," w �, �, °' �, °' � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �� 0 0 .� a a a � z x � � w � w � w Attached Wall Signs Multifa�ily Complex All Zones � � _ _ _ � Y 1 si�n up to 20 sq.ft. Instituti�nali Residential Zones � � � n/a n/a n/a Y �25%of wall area Single�usiness Residential Zones 1 n/a 60 n/a n/a n/a Y Nonresi�ential All Mixed Use and ;� �a * n/a n/a n/a Y *25% of wall area per building Nonresidential Zones Freestanding Signs SLibdivision/Area Name/Multifamily All Zones 1* 10 32 n/a n/a n/a Y Comple�/Institutional i ��o,..,..�o..:.,i ��..00��..,,��.,,.0 1 per Single Business Neighborhood 1 20 100 n/a n/a 5 �' S00 ft.of arterial street fronta�e Multi-Business Complex Business(NC)Zones 1* 20 n/a 100 n/a 5 y and 1 for each additiona1500 ft. or fraction thereof. Single Business Mixed Use and 1* 30 n/a 100 200 5 Y Nonresidential Zones Multi-Business Complex (except NC) 1* 40 250 n/a n/a 5 Y Nonresidential Freeway* All Nonresidential 1 50 250 n/a n/a 5 Y *Adjacent to I-90 only Zones Monument Signs Subdivision/Area Name/Multifamily All Zones 1 10 32 n/a n/a n/a Y Comple�/Institutional i *Per��street frontage Single Business Neighborhood 1* 7 75 n/a n/a 5 Y Multi-Business Complex Business(NC)Zones 2� � 90 n/a n/a 5 Y Single Business All Mixed Use and Z�k � 90 n/a n/a 5 Y Nonresidential Zones *Per street frontage Multi-Business Complex 2* 7 150 n/a n/a 5 Y Other Signs Directional All Zones n/a n/a 4 n/a n/a n/a N Name Plates All Zones 1 n/a 4 n/a n/a n/a N - Institutional includes nonprofit,religious or public uses,such as a church,librarv,public,or private school,hospital,or�overnment owned or operated buildin�,structure,or land used for public purposes. Page 3 of 8 B. In addition to the permanent signs allowed a maximum of two times�*�s�g�e �9� pursuant to Table 22110-1, a single decorative �n any calendar year. emblem (or standard) constructed of durable vinyl with a thickness of not less than 13 mis for G.Pennants,balloons, and streamers mav be every 50 feet of frontage shall be allowed. The displaved in conjunction with the special event lowest horizontal member of the bracket shall be si��e allowed in section F above,but must be located at a height of not less than seven feet removed at the conclusion of the event or within above the adjacent grade. thirty consecutive da� C. Where three or more single businesses agree H. Tem�orar,��ns shall not endan e� r the to share a single sign structure, an additional 20 public safety and shall be removed or relocated percent of copy area shall be allowed up to a if the buildin� official determines that a si�n is maximum of 250 square feet. (Ord. 09-010 § 1, unsafe. 2009; Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007). �_ , , 22.110.050 Permitted temporary signs. +;mo �„++„ o o,, tin a.,. � ;�,� ., tin a.,., Except as otherwise described under this section, "' n`'`';+;"""' }°"""'""""` ""';}""" ''° no permit is necessary for temporary si�ns. Tem�orar,y si�ns are not allowed to continuallX advertise �oods, services or events on a site; ^''*"'" " ";""'° """„"' �c `'"` "' ""';+ permanent si�ns shall be used for that purpose. ��ec�e��e��s�g�� --=,_.a �,. ^__,� ,•,.,��,. a-� � --a � -a---� A. A tem�orar,y si�n advertisin� a s�ecial event, "`""�'"}"'''°" " """`T°`"",}°"""'""'"„' ""';+ sale,promotion, openin� of a new business or � openin� of a business under new mana�ement mav be dis�layed and must be removed at end of "'°"' `""''*.�r" '"' ° }''"" �„"" "' ° "* use, event or condition. ""''+" " """,T°`' ; "'°"`'"'.` ° B.Number of Tem�orary Sl�ns—No more than L A-frame Si�ns—Business will be allowed a one (1) such si�n shall be allowed at an,�� maximum of one sandwich board or A-frame time for a use, except as permitted below. si�n. These si�ns are in addition to other tem�orar,5�si�ns allowed throu�h sections A—H, C. Si�na�e shall be limited to 20 square feet in and are subject to the followin�conditions: size. 1.Size The area of the si�n shall not exceed D. All tem�orar,��ns must be made of durable nine square feet per side in size and shall not materials and shall be well maintained. Si�ns exceed three feet in any dimension. are not well maintained if they are frayed, torn, Z.Maintenance Standards: Si�ns shall be or broken, or the le i�bilitv thereof has materiallX constructed out of materials able to withstand deteriorated. Unmaintained si�ns will be required to be removed. extreme weather conditions. Such materials mav be metal, finished wood, chalkboard, E. Banner si�ns must be attached to the fa�ade, whiteboard or�lastic. Si�ns and co�v should wall or window of the buildin�which includes be of professional quality.Permanent letterin� the business which thev advertise; for the business name and lo�o are required on � the Sandwich boards. Owners of sandwich F. Additional Banners or tempora .r� s��ns board si�ns shall be required to keep their si�ns advertisin� a special event,sale,promotion, in an intact, reasonably le�ible, and well openin� of a new business or a business under maintained manner. Sandwich boards are not new mana�ement are allowed by temporary well maintained if an��art thereof is broken; permit for a period of time not to exceed 30 days letters or�raphics are completely or partially Planning Commission Study Session -January 12, 2012 CTA 06-ll missin� or obstructed; or the le�ibility thereof B. Electronic signs shall be permitted on the has materially deteriorated. same basis as other signs, subject to the 3. Dis la Time: Si ns ma. only be dis la ed requirements of Table 22.110-1. All electronic � -� �-� � � messa�e center's (EMC's) are required to have durin�business hours. If business hours continue past davli�ht hours,precautions should automatic dimmin� capability that adjusts the be taken to�lace the si�n in a li�hted area.This bri�htness to the ambient li�ht at all times of the shall not be construed to allow the wirin� of a day and ni�ht. Written documentation that the si�n for li�htin�. � EMC is equi�ed with the automatic dimmin� device shall be submitted with the si�n�ermit 4. Location: Si n� s may be located no further application. than twelve feet from the entrance to the business. Such si�ns shall not be placed in a C. A roof-mounted sign may be substituted for location which is within the clearview trian�, an allowed freestanding sign; provided,that the as defined in section 22.070.020.C, or an, o� height of the sign structure may not exceed the location which will impede vehicular traffic. ma�mum height requirements of the zoning Further, such si�ns shall not be placed in a district in which the sign is located. manner which will block or otherwise obstruct the safe use of sidewalks,buildin� entrances or D. Signs located within the airport hazard area stairs b}�pedestrians. shall conform to the location and height J�. Temporary on-premises commercial signs regulations set forth in SVMC 19.110.030, are allowed without permit when posted in Airport Hazard Overlay zone. conjunction with the alteration, construction, E.No sign shall be erected,relocated or sale or lease of real property. Such signs shall maintained in a manner that prevents the free not exceed 16 square feet in copy area or seven ingress or egress from any door,window or fire feet in height. All such signs shall be affixed to either the ground or a permanent structure by escape. rope,wire, or a mechanical device- F.No sign shall be attached to a standpipe or fire K Open House/Directional Si�na�e - A-frame escape except official signs. si�ns mav be used as o�en house/directional G. Any sign erected or maintained within five si�ns and shall be allowed on each access street feet of public rights-of-way shall be smooth and to the property. Si�ns shall be placed so as not free of nails,tacks and wires. to interfere with vehicular or pedestrian traffic, shall be used only when-the�ro�e , is o�en for H. All signs shall be maintained in good repair inspection, shall be unlit, and shall be limited in pursuant to SVMC 22110110. size to 5 square feet and limited in hei�ht to 3 feet above r� ade. (Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007). L No sign shall block the view of fire protection equipment from approach. (Ord. 07-015 § 4, 22.110.060 General provisions applicable to 2007). all signs. 22.110.070 Comprehensive sign plan. A. All signs illuminated with exterior lighting shall have lighting confined to the sign, and Commercial development, shopping centers, positioned and shielded to minimize impacts to industrial parks,mixed use developments, and the surrounding area(s). Gooseneck reflectors hotel conference centers exceeding five acres in and lights are permitted on permanent size may seek approval of a sign plan speci�c to freestanding and wall signs;provided, that the proposed development. The director may lighting or glare does not extend beyond the approve a comprehensive sign plan that allows property line. deviations from the strict interpretation of spacing,height and area requirements when the following is demonstrated: Page 5 of 8 Planning Commission Study Session -January 12, 2012 CTA 06-ll A. The plan provides adequate signage for all B. Only monument signs as shown on Table proposed uses; and 22110-1 shall be allowed with designated aesthetic corridors. (Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007). B. The plan limits the number of freestanding sign structures; and 22.110.090 Sign location and front setbacks. C. The total copy area of all signage does not A. Monument signs exceeding three feet in exceed the amount which would otherwise be height shall be setback 10 feet from the front permitted. property line and outside any border easement provided,that the requirements of Chapter 22.70 Any conditions imposed to secure approvals �VMC,Fencing, Screening and Landscaping, shall be binding on the applicant,his successors (clearview triangles)have been met. and assigns. B. Freestanding signs with structural supports Modi�cations/amendments to the approved sign less than two feet in width,with copy area plan shall require reapplication and approval by placed at a height of seven feet or more above the director. If the applicant and director cannot grade, may be located at the property line; come to an agreement as to a comprehensive provided,that the requirements of Chapter 22.70 sign plan or a modi�cation/amendment to the SVMC Fencing, Screening and Landscaping, same, the director's decision may be appealed to (clearview triangles) of the Spokane Valley the hearing examiner pursuant to Chapter 17.90 uniform development code ha�e been met. SVMC. (Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007). Freestanding signs with structural supports of more than two feet shall be set back not less than 22.110.080 Aesthetic corridors. 10 feet from the front property line or border A. The standards applicable to monument signs easement. shown on Table 22110-1 shall apply to parcels C. All temporary signs, except inflatable signs, adjacent to aesthetic corridors designated in the shall be located at least five feet from public Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan: rights-of-way. 1. State Route 27 (16th Avenue south to D. Inflatable signs shall be set back at least 10 City limits); feet from public rights-of-way. 2. State Route 27 (Mansfield Avenue to E. All signs shall meet the vertical and Trent Avenue); horizontal clearance requirements of electric 3. Appleway Boulevard (south side only utilities. from Park Road to Dishman Mica Road); F. All new freestanding signs shall be located in 4. Appleway Avenue (Barker Road to a landscaped area in accordance with SVMC Hodges Road); 22.70.030(�. Landscaping should ensure that signs are not blocked or obscured by trees or 5. Dishman Mica Road(8th Avenue south to bushes. (Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007). City limits); 22.110.100 Sign area calculation. 6. 32nd Avenue within the City limits; A. Sign area for wall signs shall be no more than 7. Mirabeau Parkway(Pines Road to Indiana 25 percent of the two-dimensional area of a Avenue). building's elevation, excluding eaves and gables. Refer to Table 22.110-1. Page 6 of 8 Planning Commission Study Session -January 12, 2012 CTA 06-ll Figure 22110-1 computed by adding together the total area(s) of ___ :� all signs as shown in Figure 22110-3.Refer to �' E�� Table 22110-1 for minimum and maximum _ __—__� —__ _ height requirements. C. The sign area for multiple-sided signs shall be calculated as follows: 1. The total sign area for a two-sided sign shall be calculated using a single surface of a Figure 22.110-2 sign with messages on both sides; �� 2. The sign area for a three-sided sign shall � �' � be the sum of all surfaces where two or more g signs share a single structure; � hJl�xYrrurtr H�i�hl 3. The gross surface area of both faces of a :�,,��.,•;,,�,r• ��,�r�� V-shaped sign; 4. The copy area of a monument sign. ��p��' D. For irregularly shaped signs, the sign area is �"�� calculated by enclosing the extreme limits of the sign by no more than four rectangles. The sum Figure 22.110-3 of the area of the rectangles shall be the gross �,T�- . surface area. The maximum allowable area is � reduced by 10 percent for the second and each �� subsequent rectangle used in the calculation, �' illustrated below. � F.i.viRtn h�y=��i L., � � � .fi1C�:1'� '� � � i'.rta�: �� I ��if�rti�� 3 "CL.:r Lilic �� B. The sign area of a freestanding sign for a �- - sin le business shall be calculated as shown in � _ - �� g �— �:�� Figure 22.110-2. The sign area of a freestanding sign identifying multiple businesses shall be g 22.110.110 Maintenance of signs. 1. Conventional Measurement. Total area= a A. All signs shall be maintained in good repair. times b. The director shall have the authority to revoke any permit for signs that are tattered, torn, faded 2. Sum of Rectangles. Total area= (Area A+ or otherwise in disrepair, and may require the Area B +Area C+Area D). (Ord. 07- removal of flags,pennants and streamers which O15 § 4, 2007). are torn, discolored or in disrepair. Page 7 of 8 Planning Commission Study Session -January 12, 2012 CTA 06-ll B. All signage shall be maintained by the 1. Replacement billboards shall not business owner, or person in possession of the exceed the height limit in the property on which the sign is located. underlying zoning district,with a Maintenance shall be such that the signage maximum height limit of 50 feet in any continues to conform to the conditions imposed zone; by the sign permit. 2.No replacement billboard shall C. Any damaged sign structure shall be repaired exceed 672 square feet in copy area; within 30 days of notice. 3. Any replacement billboard may not D. Any signage which has been damaged to such be placed less than five feet from the extent that it may pose a hazard to passersby property line.No portion of the sign shall be repaired or removed within 48 hours of shall extend beyond the property line; notice. 4.No billboard may be located within E. Any abandoned sign shall be removed by and 1,000 feet of another billboard on the at the expense of the property owner within 60 same side of the street. Any days of notice. replacement billboard shall be offset from any billboard on the opposite side F. Any abandoned sign support structure shall be of the street by not less than 250 feet. removed within 36 months by the owner or Offset distance shall be measured from lessee of the premises upon which the sign is a point perpendicular to and along the located. (Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007). alignment of the roadway; 22.110.120 Existing nonconforming signs. 5. The owner of the billboard shall file Any permanent sign made nonconforming as a a complete inventory of all billboards result of the adoption of these regulations may located within the City,including date be repaired,but not structurally altered or made erected,height, size and location; more nonconforming in any way. If the sign is removed in order to make repairs, it shall be 6. Issuance of a permit for billboard replaced within 60 days, or any nonconforming replacement shall be accompanied by a rights are terminated. Thereafter,the sign shall permit for the destruction or removal of conform to the requirements of this chapter. the billboard to be replaced; and Notwithstanding other provisions of this section, 7. Any billboard that is not replaced any sign or signs for which a temporary permit within 60 months following the has been issued by the City shall be permitted to issuance of a demolition/removal remain at the location or locations authorized by permit shall not be replaced. the permit for as long as the permit is valid and all the requirements of the permit have been met. B. Replacement billboards shall not be permitted (Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007). along designated aesthetic corridors. (Ord. 07- O15 § 4, 2007). 22.110.130 Billboards. A.New billboards shall be prohibited;provided, however, that existing billboards may be replaced at another location with a structure and copy area of equal or smaller size in mixed use and nonresidential zoning districts except(NC) Neighborhood Commercial zoning districts as follows: Page 8 of 8