Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2013, 01-22 Regular Meeting
AGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING FORMAL FORMAT MEETING Tuesday,January 22,2013 6:00 p.m. Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers 11707 E Sprague Avenue Council Requests Please Silence Your Cell Phones During Council Meeting CALL TO ORDER: INVOCATION: Pastor Matthew Larson,Advent Lutheran Church PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: ROLL CALL: APPROVAL OF AGENDA: INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: COMMITTEE,BOARD,LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS: MAYOR'S REPORT: PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those on this agenda as action items. (Action items include public hearings, and those items under NEW BUSINESS. Public Comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.) When you come to the podium, please state your name and address for the record and limit remarks to three minutes. 1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. a.Approval of the following claim vouchers: VOUCHER LIST DATE VOUCHER NUMBERS; TOTAL AMOUNT 12/31/2012 27927 $105.00 12/31/2012 27928-27967; 1231120012 $1,987,717.66 01/02/2013 27968 $39,566.35 01/04/2013 27969-27982 $14,920.28 01/10/2013 27983-27998 $76,717.51 01/11/2013 27999-28068; 10547049; 104130016; 104130098 $328,736.62 01/11/2013 28069-28087 $114,942.58 01/11/2013 28088-28090 $435.00 01/15/2013 4186-4199; 28091-28096 $265,106.15 GRAND TOTAL $2,828,247.15 b.Approval of Payroll for period ending January 15,2013: $318,124.53 c.Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of January 8,2013,Formal Meeting Format d.Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of January 15,2013 Special Meeting e.Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of January 15,2013 Study Session Format Council Agenda 01-22-13 Formal Format Meeting Page 1 of 2 NEW BUSINESS: 2.First Reading Proposed Ordinance 13-001, CTA 04-12 Code Text Amendment—Lori Barlow [public comment] 3.Motion Consideration: Street Preservation Project Change Order—Eric Guth [public comment] 4.Motion Consideration: Memorandum of Understanding, Solid Waste—Mike Jackson [public comment] PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those on this agenda as action items. (Action items include public hearings, and those items under NEW BUSINESS. Public Comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.)When you come to the podium, please state your name and address for the record and limit remarks to three minutes. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: 5.Advance Agenda—Mayor Towey INFORMATION ONLY(will not be reported or discussed): 6.Coal Trains 7. Department Reports 8. Planning Commission Minutes of December 13,2012 9. Park/Library Joint Site Development Plan CITY MANAGER COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT General Meetinji Schedule(meeting schedule is always subject to change) Regular Council meetings are generally held every Tuesday beginning at 6:00 p.m. The Formal meeting formats are generally held the 2nd and 4th Tuesdays. Formal meeting have time allocated for general public comments as well as comments after each action item. The Study Session formats(the less formal meeting)are generally held the 1st, 3rd and 5th Tuesdays. Study Session formats DO NOT have time allocated for general public comments; but if action items are included, comments are permitted after those specific action items.NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical, hearing, or other impairments, please contact the City Clerk at (509)921-1000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made. Council Agenda 01-22-13 Formal Format Meeting Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 22, 2013 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business [' public hearing AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Following Vouchers: VOUCHER LIST DATE VOUCHER NUMBERS; TOTAL AMOUNT 12/31/2012 27927 $105.00 12/31/2012 27928-27967; 1231120012 $1,987,717.66 01/02/2013 27968 $39,566.35 01/04/2013 27969-27982 $14,920.28 01/10/2013 27983-27998 $76,717.51 01/11/2013 27999-28068; 10547049; 104130016; 104130098 $328,736.62 01/11/2013 28069-28087 $114,942.58 01/11/2013 28088-28090 $435.00 01/15/2013 4186-4199;28091-28096 $265,106.15 GRAND TOTAL $2,828,247.15 Explanation of Fund Numbers found on Voucher Lists #001 - General Fund Other Funds 001.011.000.511 City Council 101 Street Fund 001.013.000.513. City Manager 103 —Paths&Trails 001.013.015.515. Legal 105 Hotel/Motel Tax 001.016.000. Public Safety 120—CenterPlace Operating Reserve 001.018.013,513. Deputy City Manager 121 —Service Level Stabilization Reserve 001.018.014.514. Finance 122—Winter Weather Reserve 001.018.016.516. Human Resources 123 —Civic Facilities Replacement 001.032.000. Public Works 204—Debt Service 001.058.050.558. Comm. Develop.-Administration 301 —Capital Projects(1st 1/4%REET) 001.058,055.559. Comm.Develop.—Develop.Eng. 302—Special Capital Proj (2'16'A%REET) 001.058.056.558. Community Develop.-Planning 303—Street Capital Projects 001,058.057.559. Community Develop.-Building 304—Mirabeau Point Project 001.076.000.576. Parks&Rec—Administration 307—Capital Grants 001.076.300.576. Parks&Rec-Maintenance 309—Parks Capital Grants 001.076.301.574. Parks &Rec-Recreation 310---Civic Bldg Capital Projects 001.076.302.576. Parks &Rec-Aquatics 311 —Pavement Preservation 001.076.304.575. Parks&Rec-Senior Center 312—Capital Reserve 001.076.305.574. Parks&Rec-CenterPlace 402—Stormwater Management 001.090.000.511. General Gov't-Council related 403—Aquifer Protection Area 001.090.000.514. General Gov't-Finance related 501 —Equipment Rental&Replacement 001.090.000.517. General Gov't-Employee supply 502—Risk Management 001.090.000.518. General,Gov't-Centralized Services 001.090.000.519. General Gov't-Other Services 001.090.000.531. General Gov't-Natural Resources 001.090.000.550. General Gov't-Economic Dev, 001.090.000.560. General Gov't-Social Services 001.090.000.594. General Gov't-Capital Outlay RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Approve claims for vouchers as listed above. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: Voucher Lists vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 12/31/2012 12:04:38PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 27927 12/31/2012 000061 WILHITE,DIANA Cell Allowance 001.011.000.511 4TH QTR 2007 CELL ALLOWANCE 105.00 (reissuing unclaimed check from the past) Total: 105.00 1 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 105.00 1 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 105.00 I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that i am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: 1 • vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 12/31/2012 1:55:31PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 27928 12/31/2012 003165 AMERICAN WEST CHROME 52602 101.000.000.542 PLOW MAINTENANCE 614.16 Total: 614.16 27929 12/31/2012 003090 BIG R STORES 046068/3 101.042.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 26.07 Total: 26.07 27930 12/31/2012 000673 BUDGET ARBOR&LOGGING LLC 11-1775 101.042.000.542 TREE REMOVAL 1,250.05 Total: 1,250.05 27931 12/31/2012 002562 CD'A METALS 544766 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 106.87 544776 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 27.23 544785 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 59.08 Total: 193.18 27932 12/31/2012 000729 CH2MHILL INC 3845438 303.303.155.595 0155-SULLIVAN RD W BRIDGE SL 97,957.64 Total: 97,957.64 27933 12/31/2012 000425 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS 106913-00 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 58.11 Total: 58.11 27934 12/31/2012 001194 DEPT OF ECOLOGY 7222 402.402.000.538 2013 WASTEWATER OPERATOR G 30.00 Total: 30.00 27935 12/31/2012 002920 DIRECTV,INC 19286491055 101.042.000.543 DEC 2012 CABLE SVCS:MAINT FAI 42.99 Total: 42.99 27936 12/31/2012 002385 DKSASSOCIATES 51319 303.303.060.595 ARGONNE CORRIDOR SIGNAL&D 2,704.38 Total: 2,704.38 27937 12/31/2012002157 ELJAY OIL COMPANY 0675762 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 1,148.35 Total: 1,148.35 27938 12/31/2012 003254 EUCON CORP CRYWOLF 001.000.000.342 CRYWOLF REFUND:PERMIT V149 10.00 Total: 10.00 27939 12/31/2012 001232 FASTENAL CO IDLEW86485 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 27.81 IDLEW86534 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 147.26 Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 12/31/2012 1:55:31PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 27939 12/31/2012 001232 FASTENAL CO (Continued) 1DLEW86586 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 69.07 1DLEW86669 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 13.89 Total: 258.03 27940 12/31/2012 002507 FASTENERS,INC S3499268.001 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 144.09 Total: 144.09 27941 12/31/2012 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 38865 310.000.161.594 LEGAL PUBLICATION 65.80 38912 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 59.50 38913 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 60.35 38914 001.058.056.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 90.95 38915 001.058.056.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 93.50 Total: 370.10 27942 12/31/2012 003252 GARR,ALAN CRYWOLF 001.000.000.342 CRYWOLF REFUND:PERMIT V504 25.00 Total: 25.00 27943 12/31/2012 000007 GRAINGER 9021019709 101.042.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 5.08 9021019717 101.042.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 62.59 Total: 67.67 27944 12/31/2012 000917 GRAYBAR 964040729 101.042.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 406.72 Total: 406.72 27945 12/31/2012 000313 INLAND ASPHALT COMPANY INC. PAY APP 3 403.000.163.595 CONSTRUCTION-SPRAGUE SWAT 221,047.42 Total: 221,047.42 27946 12/31/2012 002518 INLAND PACIFIC HOSE&FITINGS 483491 101.042.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 168.30 484273 101.042.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 116.68 484298 101.042.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 273.47 484371 101.042.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 156.14 Total: 714.59 27947 12/31/2012 003238 KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS 11226410-1012 402.402.000.538 DECANT FACILITY STUDY 6,409.55 11226410-1112R 402.402.000.538 DECANT FACILITY STUDY 17,728.28 Total: 24,137.83 Page: 2 vchlist Voucher List Page: 3 12/31/2012 1:55:31PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 27948 12/31/2012 001944 LANCER LTD 0433240 001.076.305.575 BUSINESS CARDS:PARKS&REC 48.48 Total: 48.48 27949 12/31/2012 001640 MAINTENANCE SOLUTIONS,INC 71916906 101.042.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 164.00 Total: 164.00 27950 12/31/2012 002709 NORTHWEST HOSE&FITTINGS 394974-001 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 46.05 Total: 46.05 27951 12/31/2012 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 636925612001 001.011.000.511 OFFICE SUPPLIES:COUNCIL 178.64 Total: 178.64 27952 12/31/2012 000307 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER NOVEMBER 2012 001.016.000.586 STATE REMITTANCE 49,391.10 Total: 49,391.10 27953 12/31/2012 003253 OWEN,CARA CRYWOLF 001.000.000.342 CRYWOLF REFUND:PERMIT V502 25.00 Total: 25.00 27954 12/31/2012 000881 OXARC 01057SS 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 169.45 Total: 169.45 27955 12/31/2012 002616 ROADWISE,INC 54.465 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 5,350.49 54466 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 5,352.04 Total: 10,702.53 27956 12/31/2012 003225 SEATTLE DAILY JOURNAL,OF COMMER 3269266 310.000.161.594 CN:SITE DEVELOP PLANNING ADV 305.25 Total: 305.25 27957 12/31/2012 000709 SENSKE LAWN&TREE CARE INC. 53179538 001.090.000.518 SIDEWALK SNOW REMOVAL2012: 54.35 5317973 001.090.000.518 DE-ICE WALKWAYS-CITY HALL 20 43.48 5327605 402.402.000.538 FLAGGING SERVICES 169.57 Total: 267.40 27958 12/31/2012 002531 SIX ROBBLEES INC 5-656668 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 19.20 Total: 19.20 27959 12/31/2012 000308 SPOKANE CO PROSECUTING ATTY NOVEMBER 2012 001.016.000.586 CRIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION F 734.98 Page: 3 vchlist Voucher List Page: 4 12/31/2012 1:55:31PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 27959 12/31/2012 000308 000308 SPOKANE CO PROSECUTING ATTY (Continued) Total: 734.98 27960 12/31/2012 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 40100459 402.402.000.538 SPOKANE CO UTILITIES 0&M 1NV 188.46 Total: 188.46 27961 12/31/2012 002540 SPOKANE HOUSE OF HOSE INC. 258061 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 160.70 258272 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 48.61 258313 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 14.78 Total: 224.09 27962 12/31/2012 000093 SPOKESMAN-REVIEW 23152 001.011.000.511 YEARLY SUBSCRIPTION:COUNCIL 192.00 Total: 192.00 27963 12/31/2012 003206 VAN NESS FELDMAN,LLP 100714 001.058.056.558 PROFESSIONAL FEES 3,325.89 Total: 3,325.89 27964 12/31/2012 000087 VERIZON WIRELESS 1147457090 001.016.000.521 AIR CARD FOR POLICE CHEIF 40.01 1147459063 001.016.000.521 AIR CARDS FOR POLICE DEPARTh 803.30 Total: 843.31 27965 12/31/2012 003210 WEST CONSULTANTS,INC. 003355 001.058.055.559 SALTESE CREEK FLATS FLOODPL 13,556.87 Total: 13,556.87 27966 12/31/2012 000842 WM WINKLER CO INC PAYAPP 2 303.303.154.595 0154 SIDEWALK&TRANSIT CONS' 90,721.95 PAYAPP 2 303.303.149.595 0149 SIDEWALK INFILL CONSTRUC 96,533.79 Total: 187,255.74 27967 12/31/2012 001189 WSDA 65644 402.402.000.538 2013 PESTICIDE LICENSE RENEW 33.00 Total: 33.00 1231120012 12/31/2012 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 9290200415 001.016.000.521 LAW ENFORCEMENT 1,368,839.84 Total: 1,368,839.84 41 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 1,987,717.66 41 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 1,987,717.66 Page: 4 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 01/02/2013 2.51:41 PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 27968 1/2/2013 000193 NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC January 2013 001.090.000.518 CITY HALL RENT 39,566.35 Total: 39,566.35 1 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 39,566.35 1 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 39,566.35 I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 01/04/2013 1:49:59PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 27969 12/31/2012 001606 BANNER BANK 0618 001.011.000.511 NOVEMBER 2012:0618 116.30 4064 001.058.057.559 DECEMBER 2012:4064 2,738.43 4458 001.011.000.511 NOVEMBER 2012:4458 4,146.03 8861 001.076.305.575 NOVEMBER 2012:8861 557.59 9048 101.042.000.542 NOVEMBER 2012:9048 2,815.56 Total: 10,373.91 27970 12/31/2012 000326 CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION#19 Dec 2012 001.076.305.575 UTILITIES:PARKS 68.98 Total: 68.98 27971 12/31/2012 003136 GIBSON,CARLY Expenses 001.018.014.514 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 11.10 Total: 11.10 27972 12/31/2012 001944 LANCER LTD 433154 001.076.305.575 CHRISTMAS CARD CENTERPLACE 217.40 Total: 217.40 27973 12/31/2012 000252 LOWE'S BUSINESS ACCOUNT December 2012 001.076.305.575 OPERATING SUPPLIES:CP 187.16 Total: 187.16 27974 12/31/2012 001860 PLATT 3027313 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 71.74 Total: 71.74 27975 12/31/2012 000709 SENSKE LAWN&TREE CARE INC. 5328205 001.016.000.521 DE-ICE WALKWAYS-PRECINCT 163.06 5330151 001.076.300.576 SIDEWALK SNOW REMOVAL/DE-IC 193.49 Total: 356.55 27976 12/31/2012 000935 SERVICE PAPER CO 76752860 001.016.000.521 SUPPLIES FOR PRECINCT 357.69 Total: 357.69 27977 12/31/2012 000994 SIMPSON ENGINEERS,INC. 15960 001.076.000.576 UNION ROAD/RAILROAD SURVEY: 700.00 Total: 700.00 27978 12/31/2012 000658 SPOKANE CO SUPERIOR COURT DECEMBER 2012 001.013.015.515 FILE COMPLAINT 240.00 Total: 240.00 27979 12/31/2012 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST#3 Dec 2012 001.076.300.576 WATER IRRIGATION CHRGS:APPL 17.92 Dec 2012 101.042.000.542 WATER CHRGS:PW 328.29 Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 01/04/2013 1:49:59PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 27979 12/31/2012 000324 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST#3 (Continued) Total: 346.21 27980 12/31/2012 000773 STUDIO CASCADE,INC. 1776 001.076.000.576 PLANNING SUPPORT SERVICES 903.50 Total: 903.50 27981 12/31/2012 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 1660071-2681-5 001.076.305.575 WASTE MGMT:CENTERPLACE 763.40 1660072-2681-3 001.016.000.521 WASTE MGMT:PRECINCT 292.64 Total: 1,056.04 27982 12/31/2012 001409 WORLD CLASS COMMUNICATIONS 121211173101 001.076.305.575 ANSWERING SERVICE CENTERPL 30.00 Total: 30.00 14 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 14,920.28 14 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 14,920.28 1,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: 2 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 01/10/2013 11:04:39AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 27983 1/10/2013 001081 ALSCO LSP01236401 001.016.000.521 FLOOR MATS:PRECINCT 20.39 LSP01249203 001.016.000.521 FLOOR MATS:PRECINCT 20.39 LSP01255293 001.016.000.521 FLOOR MATS:PRECINCT 20.39 Total: 61.17 27984 1/10/2013 000334 ARGUS JANITORIAL LLC INV008235 001.016.000.521 JANITORIAL SERVICES:DEC 2012 2,16523 Total: 2,165.23 27985 1/10/2013 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC 9391540 001.076.305.575 LINEN SUPPLY AND SERVICE FOR 38.66 9393529 001.076.305.575 LINEN SUPPLY AND SERVICE FOR 101.16 Total: 139.82 27986 1/10/2013 001169 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY December 2012 001.058.056.558 PETTY CASH:8193,8195,96,97 6.50 Total: 6.50 27987 1/10/2013 001665 CLIFF SCHMITZ CONSTRUCTION 02-FSW312 001.237.10.98 SWALE DEPOSIT FEE REFUND 1,000.00 02-FSW350 001237.10.98 SWALE DEPOSIT FEE REFUND 1,000.00 02-FSW455 001.237.10.98 SWALE DEPOSIT FEE 1,000.00 02-FSW650 001.237.10.98 SWALE DEPOSIT FEE REFUND 1,000.00 03-FSW41 001.237.10.98 SWALE DEPOSIT FEE REFUND 1,000.00 03-FSW71 001.237.10.98 SWALE DEPOSIT FEE REFUND 1,000.00 Total: 6,000.00 27988 1/10/2013 001121 DEW DROP SPRINKLERS,&LANDSCAPI Terrace View Park#3 309.309.165.594 TERRACE VIEW PLAYGROUND IMF 4,251.70 Total: 4,251.70 27989 1/10/2013 000715 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS December 2012 001.090.000.518 SUPPLIES:KITCHEN AND COUNCII 1,908.87 Total: 1,908.87 27990 1/10/2013 000388 IRVIN WATER DIST.#6 December 2012 001.076.300.576 UTILITIES:PARKS 230.74 Total: 230.74 27991 1/10/2013 001635 ISS FACILITY/EVENT SERVICES 495767 001.076.305.575 EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLA/ 264.77 495794 001.076.305.575 EVENT SERVICES:CENTERPLACE 51.22 495795 001.076.305.575 EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLAI 24.66 Total: 340.65 Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 01/10/2013 11:04:39AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 27992 1/10/2013 001133 PATRIOT FIRE PROTECTION,INC. 2310811 001.016.000.521 ANNUAL INSPECT SPRINKLER SW. 195.66 Total: 195.66 27993 1/10/2013 001860 PLATT 3065346 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES:CENTERPLACE 165.37 3077514 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES AT CENTERPLACE 67.39 Total: 232.76 27994 1/10/2013 003237 PROSSER&SONS 41671 001.076.000.576 TERRACE VIEW SWINGS INSTALL 902.21 Total: 902.21 27995 1/10/2013 000709 SENSKE LAWN&TREE CARE INC. 4518049 001.076.300.576 CONTRACT MAINT:DEC 2012 54,123.81 5328206 001.076.300.576 SIDEWALK SNOW REMOVAL2012 73.92 5328207 001.076.300.576 SIDEWALK SNOW REMOVALIDE-IC 123.92 5329033 001.016.000.521 CONTRACT MAINT:DEC 2012 PRE 485.84 5330149 001.076.300.576 SIDEWALK SNOW REMOVAL/DE-IC 202.19 5330150 001_016.000.521 SNOW REMOVE AND DE-ICE:PRE 1,032.66 Total: 56,042.34 27996 1/10/2013 000935 SERVICE PAPER CO 76756045 001.016.000.521 CENTERPLACE OPERATING SUPP 99.77 Total: 99.77 27997 1/10/2013 001083 STANDARD PLBG HEATING CONTROLS 50269 001.016.000.521 WORK ORDER 22718 3,293.98 Total: 3,293.98 27998 1/10/2013 001911 THE GLOVER MANSION CP556 001.076.305.575 EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLA1 846.11 Total: 846.11 16 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 76,717.51 16 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 76,717.51 Page: 2 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 01/11/2013 11:30:19AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 27999 1/11/2013 000958 AAA SWEEPING,LLC 49034-A 402.402.000.538 2012 STREET SWEEPING SERVICE 5,530.62 Total: 5,530.62 28000 1/11/2013 002816 ABLE CLEAN-UP TECHNOLOGIES 14934 101.042.000.542 HAZARDOUS WASTE CLEAN UP 1,182.14 Total: 1,182.14 28001 1/11/2013 000197 AIRFACTZ 68871 001.018.016.516 CRIMINAL REPORTS:NEW HIRES 40.00 Total: 40.00 28002 1/11/2013 002931 ALL-WESTERN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 94787 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 21.74 Total: 21.74 28003 1/11/2013 000150 ALLIED FIRE&SECURITY 215854 001_090.000.518 REPLACE LOCKS ON CASH DRAW 107.05 Total: 107.05 28004 1/11/2013 003078 ALLWEST TESTING&ENGINEERING 62120 403.000.163.595 MATERIALS TESTING-PROJECT# 3,939.80 Total: 3,939.80 28005 1/11/2013 001081 ALSCO LSPO1251713 001.058.057.559 FLOOR MATS:BLDG 39.55 Total: 39.55 28006 1/11/2013 003090 BIG R STORES 046255/3 101,000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 84.53 STATEMENT 101.000.000.542 FINANCE CHARGES SUPPLIES:PV 1.36 Total: 85.89 28007 1/11/2013 000168 BLACK BOX NETWORK SVC SPO-037695 001.090.000.518 PHONE CHANGE OVER 1,250.07 Total: 1,250.07 28008 1/11/2013 000904 BRANCH,CAROLBELLE EXPENSE 001.018.013.513 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT:OCT 18.93 Total: 18.93 28009 1/11/2013 002993 BROADWAY SPLICING SUPPLY 374148 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 184.49 Total: 184.49 28010 1/11/2013 002517 BROWN BEARING CO INC 5006709 101.000.000,542 SUPPLIES:PW 53.70 Total: 53.70 Page: 1 • vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 01/11/2013 11:30:19AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 28011 1/11/2013 000863 CENTURY WEST ENG CORP 233423 101.042.000.542 2012 TIP SERVICES-EXPIRES 12/: 3,433.77 Total: 3,433.77 28012 1/11/2013 000322 CENTURYLINK DECEMBER 2012 001.076.000.576 DECEMBER PHONE:ACCT 509-Z14 501.85 Total: 501.85 28013 1/11/2013 002572 CINTAS CORPORATOIN 606739468 101.042.000.543 SERVICES:PW 187.70 606739932 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 117.35 606740897 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 133.11 606741400 101.042.000.543 SERVICES:PW 160.53 606741844 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 132.26 606742798 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 132.80 Total: 863.75 28014 1/11/2013 000571 CODE PUBLISHING CO 42468 001.013.000.513 MUNICIPAL CODE UPDATE 377.78 Total: 377.78 28015 1/11/2013 000508 CONOCOPHILLIPS FLEET 31640710 001.058.057.559 DECEMBER 2012:FLEET FUEL BIL 1,654.23 Total: 1,654.23 28016 1/11/2013 000683 DAVID EVANS&ASSOCIATES 326059 001.058.055.559 SPOKANE VALLEY PLAT REVIEW 1,424.00 Total: 1,424.00 28017 1/11/2013 000409 DEPT OF REVENUE 4TH QTR 2012 001.076.301.586 LEASHOLD EXCISE TAX RETURN C 2,853.80 Total: 2,853.80 28018 1/11/2013 000912 DEX MEDIA WEST DECEMBER 2012 001.076.305.575 ADVERTISING FOR CENTERPLACE 166.46 Total: 166.46 28019 1/11/2013 000278 DRISKELL,CARY EXPENSE 001.013.015.515 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT:DEC 51.32 Total: 51.32 28020 1/11/2013 002157 ELJAY OIL COMPANY 4205402 101.000.000.542 OIL PRODUCTS FOR MAINT SHOP 7,414.05 Total: 7,414.05 28021 1/11/2013 001926 FARR,SARAH EXPENSE 001.018.014.514 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT DEC 42.18 Total: 42.18 Page: 2 vchlist Voucher List Page: 3 01/11/2013 11:30:19AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 28022 1/11/2013 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 38946 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 33.60 Total: 33.60 28023 1/11/2013 001253 GORDON THOMAS HONEYWELL DEC 12 1042 001.011.000.511 LOBBYIST SERVICES 3,644.21 Total: 3,644.21 28024 1/11/2013 002235 GRAFOS,DEAN EXPENSE 001.011.000.511 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT:DEC 13.32 Total: 13.32 28025 1/11/2013 000007 GRAINGER 9021019725 001.058.055.559 SUPPLIES:CD 12.83 Total: 12.83 28026 1/11/2013 000002 H&H BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC. 244909 001.058.050.558 COPIER COST:CD 7.15 DECEMBER 2012 001.058.057.559 COPIER COST 1,516.11 Total: 1,523.26 28027 1/11/2013 002682 HAFNER,CHARLES EXPENSE 001.011.000.511 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT:DEC 64.93 Total: 64.93 28028 1/11/2013 002520 HUSKY INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 77593 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 84.98 77594 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 150.11 77728 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 15.17 Total: 250.26 28029 1/11/2013 002538 HYDRAULICS PLUS,INC 15992 101.000.000.542 47303D:SERVICE REPAIR 760.90 DECEMBER 2012 101.000.000.542 UNCOLLECTED SALES TAX SUPPL 969.75 Total: 1,730.65 28030 1/11/2013 002518 INLAND PACIFIC HOSE&FITINGS 484502 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 244.51 484598 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 54.60 STATEMENT 101.000.000.542 SERVICE CHARGES FOR SUPPLIE 2.17 Total: 301.28 28031 1/11/2013 000864 JUB ENGINEERS,INC. 0079669 101.042.000.542 TIP DATA MAINTENANCE AND UPD 8,491.41 Total: 8,491.41 28032 1/11/2013 002676 KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES K868094 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 106.43 Page: 3 vchlist Voucher List Page: 4 01/11/2013 11:30:19AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 28032 1/11/2013 002676 002676 KAMAN INDUSTRIALTECHNOLOGIE (Continued) Total: 106.43 28033 1/11/2013 002466 KENWORTH SALES 142461 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 61.57 Total: 61.57 28034 1/11/2013 002259 MENKE JACKSON BEYER EHILS 439 001.013.015.515 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 796.25 470 001.013.015.515 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 603.09 511 001.013.015.515 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1.57 Total: 1,400.91 28035 1/11/2013 000258 MICROFLEX INC. 00021050 001.090.000.518 TAXTOOLS SOFTWARE RENTAL:0 343.83 Total: 343.83 28036 1/11/2013 000013 NEOPOST USA,INC. 13823961 001.090.000.518 FEEDER MACHINE:CONTRACT 12: 3,645.00 Total: 3,645.00 28037 1/11/2013 001035 NETWORK DESIGN&MANAGEMENT 21856 001.090.000.518 HP CARE PACKS 3,349.26 3555 001.090.000.518 IT SUPPORT 7,720.00 3639 001.090.000.518 MONTHLY SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 4,777.50 Total: 15,846.76 28038 1/11/2013 002556 NORTHWEST WEATHERNET INC 2012-9503 101.000.000.542 2012-2013 WINTER FORCASTING: 315.00 Total: 315.00 28039 1/11/2013 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 1532651631 001.090.000.518 OFFICE SUPPLIES:IT 3.30 636600878001 001.018.016.516 OFFICE SUPPLIES:HR 40.20 637018321001 001.076.305.575 OFFICE SUPPLIES:PARK&REC 15.11 637018404001 001.076.305.575 OFFICE SUPPLIES:PARKS&REC 68.53 637018405001 001.076.305.575 OFFICE SUPPLIES:PARK&REC 10.86 637018406001 001.076.000.576 OFFICE SUPPLIES:PARK&REC 7.14 637381923001 001.090.000.518 OFFICE SUPPLIES:IT 20.96 638373181001 001.090.000,518 OFFICE SUPPLIES:IT 4.30 638373187001 001.090.000.518 OFFICE SUPPLIES:IT 46.73 638488237001 001.076.305.575 OFFICE SUPPLIES:PARKS&REC 158.77 638488325001 001.076.305.575 OFFICE SUPPLIES:PARKS&REC 4.42 638602651001 001.090.000.519 OFFICE SUPPLIES:CITY HALL 102.30 Total: 482.62 Page: 4 vchlist Voucher List Page: 5 01/11/2013 11:30:19AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 28040 1/11/2013 000881 OXARC R173951 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 90.82 Total: 90.82 28041 1/11/2013 003257 PACIFIC NORTHWEST WHITE CLOUD CRYWOLF 001.000.000.342 CRYWOLF REFUND:PERMIT V382' 25.00 Total: 25.00 28042 1/11/2013 001089 POE ASPHALT PAVING,INC. 43819 101.000.000.542 2012 STREET AND STORMWATER 8,189.83 Total: 8,189.83 28043 1/11/2013 000256 RAINBOW ELECTRIC INC 128209 001.090.000.518 COAX INSTALLATION:CONF ROOT 463,06 Total: 463.06 28044 1/11/2013 000675 RAMAX PRINTING&AWARDS 23603 001.058.056.558 SUPPLIES:CD 154.35 Total: 154.35 28045 1/11/2013 002578 REBUILDING&HARDFACING INC 46423 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 1,295.70 Total: 1,295.70 28046 1/11/2013 000064 SCHIMMELS,GARY EXPENSE 001.011.000.511 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT:DEC 55.49 Total: 55.49 28047 1/11/2013 000709 SENSKE LAWN&TREE CARE INC. 4525000 101.042.000.542 2012 EMERGENCY TRAFFIC CONT 542.71 5328204 001.090.000.518 DE-ICE WALKS,SNOW REMOVAL C 97.83 5330148 001.090.000.518 SNOW REMOVAL FOR CITY HALL 152.18 Total: 792.72 28048 1/11/2013 000854 SHERRY PRATT VAN VOORHIS, INC 1354,06 403.000.163.595 SWALE UPGRADE PROJECT 345.00 Total: 345.00 28049 1/11/2013 002531 SIX ROBBLEES INC 5-658363 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 82.39 Total: 82.39 28050 1/11/2013 000779 SOUTHARD,BRAD DECEMBER 2012 101.042.000.542 2012 DEAD ANIMAL REMOVAL 2,815.00 Total: 2,815.00 28051 1/11/2013 000230 SPOKANE CO AUDITORS OFFICE DECEMBER 2012 001.058.056.558 RECORDING FEES 1,181.00 Total: 1,181.00 Page: 5 vchlist Voucher List Page: 6 01/11/2013 11:30:19AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 28052 1/11/2013 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 51501457 402.402.000.538 DETENTION SVCS INVOICE:DECE 4,481.92 Total: 4,481.92 28053 1/11/2013 002540 SPOKANE HOUSE OF HOSE INC. 259982 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 121.41 Total: 121.41 28054 1/11/2013 001903 SPOKANE TRAFFIC CONTROL 1112-7 101.042.000,542 MAINT ON MISC.ROADS 1,280.00 Total: 1,280.00 28055 1/11/2013 000093 SPOKESMAN-REVIEW 341603 001.018.016.516 ADVERTISEMENT:ACCT 50869 205.00 Total: 205.00 28056 1/11/2013 000311 SPRINT 959698810-061 001.058.057.559 GPS PHONE:DECEMBER 2012 70.30 Total: 70.30 28057 1/11/2013 000773 STUDIO CASCADE,INC. 1786 001.058.056,558 PLANNING SUPPORT SERVICES 8,336.00 Total: 8,336.00 28058 1/11/2013 000261 THRIFTY RENTA CAR AUTO SALES DEC-12-1078 001.032.000.543 DEC SUZUKI VIN 305171 RENTAL C 332.13 DEC-12-1079 001.032.000.543 DEC SUZUKI VIN 302846 RENTAL C 245.03 DEC-12-1080 402.402.000.538 DEC-HONDA VIN 033896 RENTAL( 245.03 Total: 822.19 28059 1/11/2013 000335 TIRE-RAMA 8040031401 101.000.000.542 53665D:REPLACE TIRES 3,089.62 8080020685 101.042.000.542 47366D:OIL CHANGE 36.16 Total: 3,125.78 28060 1/11/2013 001464 TW TELECOM 05247352 001.076.305.575 INTERNET/DATA/PHONE LINES:DE 1,159.88 Total: 1,159.88 28061 1/11/2013 002597 TWISTED PAIR ENTERPR1ZES L.L.0 12202012 001.011.000.511 BROADCASTING COUNCIL MTGS: 1,565.28 Total: 1,565.28 28062 1/11/2013 000014 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES,INC. 045-79394 001.090.000.518 FINANCIALS CONVERSION FOR 2C 3,000.00 Total: 3,000.00 28063 1/11/2013 000337 UPS 0000Y3F950492 001.058.057.559 RETURNED INCORRECT SHIPMEN 37.81 Page: 6 vchlist Voucher List Page: 7 01/11/2013 11:30:19AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 28063 1/11/2013 000337 000337 UPS (Continued) Total: 37.81 28064 1/11/2013 003206 VAN NESS FELDMAN,LLP 100959 001.058.056.558 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,056.44 Total: 4,056.44 28065 1/11/2013 000087 VERIZON WIRELESS 1147464976 001.058.057.559 DEC 2012-VERIZON CELL PHONE: 1,814.85 6828455683 001.013.000.513 DEC 2012-WIRELESS DATA CARD! 560.14 Total: 2,374.99 28066 1/11/2013 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 1560073-2681-1 101.042.000.543 WASTE MGMT:MAINT FACILITY 178.12 Total: 178.12 28067 1/11/2013 002960 WICK,BEN EXPENSE 001.011.000.511 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT:2012 325.34 Total: 325.34 28068 1/11/2013 002651 WOODARD,ARNE EXPENSE 001.011.000.511 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT:DEC 56.16 Total: 56.16 10547049 1/31/2013 000409 DEPT OF REVENUE 4th QTR 2012 001.076.305.575 USE TAX RETURN:COMBINED EX( 495.90 Total: 495.90 104130016 12/31/2012 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER DECEMBER 2012 001.016.000.539 SPOKANE COUNTY SERVICES 208,531.32 Total: 208,531.32 104130098 1/7/2013 002244 AOT PUBLIC SAFETY CORPORATION SPKVLY-36 001.016.000.521 CRYWOLF CHARGES:NOVEMBER 3,517.38 Total: 3,517.38 73 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 328,736.62 73 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 328,736.62 Page: 7 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 01/11/2013 1:32:19PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 28069 1/11/2013 000277 AWC 2013 001.011.000.511 2013 MEMBERSHIP FEES 61,256.00 2013 AWC MEMBERSHIF 001.018.016.518 2013 AWC DRUG&ALCOHOL MEM 435.00 Total: 61,691.00 28070 1/11/2013 000497 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON 111-1538451 001.090.000.592 ADMIN FEES FOR BOND OBLICATI, 300.93 Total: 300.93 28071 1/11/2013 001880 CROWN WEST REALTY LLC JANUARY 2013 101.042.000.543 COMMON AREA MAINT CHARGE:Iv 169.53 Total: 169.53 28072 1/11/2013 003255 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS 61142 101.042.000.542 TOWER RENTAL 200.00 Total: 200.00 28073 1/11/2013 002604 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC 76310224 001.090.000.548 LEASE CONTRACT 001-8922117-OC 1,087.48 Total: 1,087.48 28074 1/11/2013 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 38973 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 199.75 38978 001.058.056.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 69.70 38979 001.058.056.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 69.70 Total: 339.15 28075 1/11/2013 001728 HP FINANCIAL SERVICES CO JANUARY 2013 001.090.000.548 JANUARY 2013:LEASE PAYMENT 2,135.66 Total: 2,135.66 28076 1/11/2013 002538 HYDRAULICS PLUS,INC 16001 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 148.02 Total: 148.02 28077 1/11/2013 000265 JACKSON,MIKE JANUARY2013 001.013.000.513 MONTHLY AUTO ALLOWANCE 300.00 Total: 300.00 28078 1/11/2013 000662 NATL BARRICADE&SIGN CO 78704 101.042.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 13.59 Total: 13.59 28079 1/11/2013 002243 ORBITCOM 00632721 001.090.000.518 ETHERNET:JANUARY 2013 590.00 Total: 590.00 28080 1/11/2013 000677 PAW 2013 001.058.056.558 2013 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 120.00 Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 01/11/2013 1:32:19PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 28080 1/11/2013 000677 000677 PAW (Continued) Total: 120.00 28081 1/11/2013 000658 SPOKANE CO SUPERIOR COURT JANUARY 2013 001.013.015.515 FILE COMPLAINT:3550.191 240.00 Total: 240.00 28082 1/11/2013 000202 SRCAA 2987 001.090.000.553 LOCALASSESSMENT FOR 1ST QT 28,930.00 Total: 28,930.00 28083 1/11/2013 000273 SRTC TS-1739 101.042.000.542 2013 MEMBERSHIP DUES 18,022.00 Total: 18,022.00 28084 1/11/2013 001134 WA STATE DEPT OF HEALTH 010460 402.402.000.553 2013 WATERWORKS CERT RENEW 42.00 Total: 42.00 28085 1/11/2013 002839 WIND WIRELESS INC. 77669 101.042.000.542 WIRELESS TELEPHONE/INTERNE 84.95 Total: 84.95 28086 1/11/2013 000310 WSAMA 81357 001.013.015.515 2013 WSAMA MEMBERSHIP FEE 80.00 Total: 80.00 28087 1/11/2013 003002 XO COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES 0256021850 001.076.305.575 INTERNET/DATA LINES:JANUARY; 448.27 Total: 448.27 19 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 114,942.58 19 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 114,942.58 Page: 2 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 01/11/2013 1:53:10PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 28088 1/11/2013 000060 DENENNY,RICHARD 2nd Qtr 001.011.000.511 CELL ALLOWANCE 135.00 (reissuing unclaimed check from the past) Total: 135.00 28089 1/11/2013 001713 RCCCS Refund 001237.10.97 REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 250.00 Total: 250.00 28090 1/11/2013 001178 WEST PLAINS COMMUNITY FAIR Refund 001.237.10.97 REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 50.00 Total: 50.00 3 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 435.00 3 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 435.00 1,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 01/15/2013 3:07:34PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 4186 1/4/2013 000682 EFTPS Ben47362 311.231.11.00 FEDERAL TAXES:Payment 33,184.07 Total: 33,184.07 4187 1/4/2013 000048 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS,401A PLAN Ben47364 001.231.14.00 401A:Payment 23,950.20 Total: 23,950.20 4188 1/4/2013 000145 VANTAGEPOINTTRANSFERAGENTS,457 PLF Ben47366 001.231.18.00 457 DEFERRED COMPENSATION:Payr 6,268.30 Total: 6,268.30 4189 1/4/2013 000162 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS,401A EXEC PL Ben47368 001.231.14.00 401 EXEC PLAN:Payment 1,083.90 Total: 1,083.90 4199 1/4/2013 000682 EFTPS Ben47374 001.231.11.00 FEDERAL TAXES:Payment 743.24 Total: 743.24 28091 1/4/2013 000120 AWC Ben47352 001.231.16,00 HEALTH PLANS:Payment 107,221.82 Ben47370 001.231.16.00 HEALTH PLANS(COUNCIL):Payment 7,111.86 Total: 114,333.68 28092 1/4/2013 000165 DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS Ben47354 001.231.15.00 PERS:Payment 57,101.80 Total: 57,101.80 28093 1/4/2013 002227 IDAHO TAX COMMISSION Ben47360 001.231.50.03 IDAHO STATE TAX BASE:Payment 611.75 Total: 611.75 28094 1/4/2013 000164 LABOR&INDUSTRIES Ben47350 001.231.17.00 LABOR&INDUSTRIES:Payment 24,536.63 Ben47372 001.231.17.00 LABOR&INDUSTRIES:Payment 234.57 Total: 24,771.20 28095 1/4/2013 000699 WA COUNCIL CO/CITY EMPLOYEES . Ben47356 001.231.21.00 UNION DUES:Payment 2,220.63 Total: 2,220.63 28096 1/4/2013 002574 WASHINGTON TRUST BANK Ben47358 001.231.20.00 BERG20110-02-03952-4:Payment 837.38 Total: 837.38 11 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 265,106.15 Page: 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 01-22-2013 Department Director Approval : ❑ Item: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Payroll for Period Ending January 15, 2013 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Budget/Financial impacts: Employees Council Total Gross: $ 242,477.01 $ $242,477.01 Benefits: $ 75,647.52 i $ 75,647.52 Total payroll $ 318,124.53 $ $318,124.53 STAFF CONTACT: Raba Nimri DRAFT MINUTES City of Spokane Valley City Council Regular Meeting Formal Meeting Format Tuesday,January 8,2013 Mayor Towey called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Attendance: City Staff: Tom Towey,Mayor Mike Jackson,City Manager Gary Schimmels,Deputy Mayor Cary Driskell, City Attorney Dean Grafos, Councilmember John Hohman,Community Development Dir. Chuck Hafner, Councilmember Mike Stone,Parks&Rec Director Ben Wick, Councilmember Mark Calhoun,Finance Director Arne Woodard, Councilmember Eric Guth,Public Works Director Rick VanLeuven,Police Chief Morgan Koudelka, Sr.Administrative Analyst Carolbelle Branch,Public Information Officer Carrie Koudelka,Deputy City Clerk INVOCATION: Pastor Jerry Sponsellor of Opportunity Baptist Church led the invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Towey invited Cub Scout Troop 420 to lead the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: Deputy City Clerk Koudelka called the roll; all Councilmembers were present. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the agenda. INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: Mayor Towey presented the International City/County Management Association's (ICMA) "Voice of the People Award for Transformation" to representatives of the Spokane County Ambulance Services Board and Spokane Valley Fire Department. The award is one of eight awards given throughout the United States based on the improved service ratings for ambulance services in our latest citizen survey. He said in 2009, seventy-nine percent of citizens rated ambulance services as excellent or good and in our 2011 survey, ninety percent rated ambulance services as excellent or good. He presented the award to Cheney Fire Chief Mike Winters, Chair of the Ambulance Services Board, and acknowledged the Fire Department Chiefs in attendance as well as the general manager of American Medical Response. Mayor Towey presented former Councilmember Brenda Grassel with a plaque for her three years of service on the Council. He said he has tremendous respect for her,that she has been a steady voice for the people and said she has raised the bar for this and future Councils. COMMITTEE,BOARD,LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS: Councilmember Woodard reported that went to the GSI Governor's Elect idea session where he discussed the $4 million needed for the Sullivan Bridge and expressed it as a regional need. He said he went to the Visit Spokane Board meeting to discuss the possibility of the world figure skating championship coming here in 2016 and said that nothing has yet developed. He said he attended the Chamber of Commerce Government Affairs meeting and reported they are developing a legislative agenda to take to Olympia. Councilmember Wick had nothing to report. Council Regular Meeting 01-08-2013 Page 1 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT Councilmember Grafos said he attended a number of conferences and read a statement (included as an attachment to the minutes) detailing his experience at the National League of Cities conference he attended in Boston. He said it was beneficial to hear what cities around the country are experiencing and that in attending several priority based budgeting seminars he came away feeling Spokane Valley is well ahead of other cities in our financial sustainability. Deputy Mayor Schimmels said he attended the Spokane Transit Authority(STA)Board meeting,the STA Planning Committee meeting and the Solid Waste Liaison Board meeting sponsored by City of Spokane. He said Spokane is looking at a $9 per ton reduction in our current tipping fee at the transfer stations but he said they have to increase the transaction fee for the operation of that system from the current$7.00 to $15.00. Councilmember Hafner said he went to the STA Board meeting and he said ridership is at an all-time high but with that comes questions relating to sustainability with continued growth. He also attended the meeting of the Regional Health District Board and they discussed water chlorination. He said he attended the 9-1-1 Emergency Board meeting, he said many municipalities that don't have enough sales tax funding need to use reserve funds to pay for their needs and they are looking to other agencies, such as Spokane Valley, for help. He said he is involved in SCOPE and said they are able to save the Sheriff's office up to$2 million dollars a year by using the SCOPE volunteer services. MAYOR'S REPORT: Mayor Towey reported he attended a number of Mayor's conferences in December and said he is proud to represent Spokane Valley because of the financial situation we are in. He said he attended the Northeast Mayors conference where they discussed problems and solutions common to the east side of the state. He also attended the Regional Clean Air Committee meeting and discussed the burning ban and he said they opted to keep the burning ban perimeter where it is rather than eliminating it. Mayor Towey then read the proclamations for Spokane Valley's Tenth Anniversary and Human Trafficking Awareness Day. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mayor Towey invited public comments. Peggy Doering, 11522 E Sunview Circle — said that as the Valleyfest Executive Director she expresses her thanks to Council for the support given to Valleyfest at the December 11, 2012 Council meeting. She said the Valleyfest Board and volunteers will continue to work with hotels and other community partners to achieve the goals of the hotel/motel tax funds to bring tourism to Spokane Valley. 1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. a.Approval of the following claim vouchers: VOUCHER LIST DATE VOUCHER NUMBERS; TOTAL AMOUNT 12/07/2012 27700-27725 $137,944.12 12/07/2012 27726-27772; 1204120007 $289,735.98 12/10/2012 4157-4160; 4170; 27774-27776 $233,275.82 12/13/2012 27777-27790 $67,358.64 12/14/2012 27791-27834 $259,916.35 12/19/2012 4171-4174; 27835-27836 $59,618.28 12/19/2012 27837 $787.80 12/21/2012 27838-27859 $79,230.51 12/21/2012 27860-27926; 1218120113 $352,159.39 12/21/2012 5536-5543 $1,505.50 GRAND TOTAL $1,481,532.39 b.Approval of Payroll for period ending December 15,2012: $273,743.07 c.Approval of Payroll for period ending December 31,2012: $392,058.94 Council Regular Meeting 01-08-2013 Page 2 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT d.Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of December 4,2012 Study Session Format e.Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of December 11,2012 Formal Meeting Format f.Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of December 18,2012 Study Session Format g.Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of December 19,2012 Special Meeting It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the consent agenda. NEW BUSINESS: 2.Motion Consideration: Council Vacancy Procedure—Mike Jackson It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to approve the procedure for filling a Council vacancy as submitted. City Manager Jackson said with the departure of Councilmember Grassel,we have ninety days from the date of the vacancy to fill the position or the County will fill it for us.He said March 21st is the deadline but he said we are hoping to have it filled by February 5th. He said the applications are due this Friday, January 11th, interviews will be January 29th, and the appointment at the February 5th Council meeting. The candidates to be interviewed will receive the questions in advance; however the Council does not have to stick to the questions the candidates are given and they can also ask follow-up questions. Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion passes. 3.Motion Consideration: Regional Animal Control Services Interlocal Agreement—Morgan Koudelka It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to finalize and execute the Interlocal Agreement for Animal Control Services in the City of Spokane Valley. Senior Administrative Analyst Koudelka started by thanking Nancy Hill of SCRAPS, Jim Emacio and Bob Wrigley of Spokane County, County Commissioner Todd Mielke, Mike Jackson, Cary Driskell, Mark Calhoun, Former Councilmember Grassel and Councilmember Wick who ensured we undertook a thorough process to provide the best possible service to our citizens. He said the agreement establishes an enterprise fund for animal control, stabilizes cost and service levels, and establishes a board of directors with representatives from the jurisdictions who will meet regularly to monitor costs and performance measures. He said the City of Spokane does not want membership on the board of directors and that is reflected in the number of board members in the agreement. Mr. Koudelka said capital costs will remain fixed with no CPI increase and operating costs will be capped at the annual change in CPI.He said the starting costs are equal to the 2012 costs and there is no escalator for 2014. He said debt service costs will be billed twice yearly and operating costs will be billed monthly except in the first year in which the City will pay the first half-year of cost at the beginning of the year. The agreement includes an operating and a reserve fund, it is for a twenty-year term and it works with or without the participation of the City of Spokane. Mr. Koudelka pointed out and clarified the most recent changes to the draft contract as provided in the packet. He said we wanted to ensure the City would get full use out of the facility for the useful life of the building so that if the County chooses not to renew after twenty years,then any unused value will be refunded to the City. He said the annual budget will include indirect cost as defined in the A-87 cost allocation plan.He said all entities will share equitably in the costs and if better terms are offered to any city or town, those terms will be offered to Spokane Valley as well. Councilmember Grafos asked when the new facility will open. Mr. Koudelka said respondents to the RFP for architectural and engineering services anticipate meeting the goal of opening the beginning of 2014. Councilmember Hafner asked Mr. Koudelka to explain the CPI and the $10,000 reserve funding. Mr. Koudelka said the CPI is a cap on costs. He said in many of our agreements with the County we pay actual costs but we don't always know what those costs will be at the end of the year. He said CPI gives some certainty of what the costs will be but is not assigning an increase to CPI each year. There is no CPI adjustment for capital cost for the life of the agreement. He said the $10,000 operating reserve is to account for any needs that were not budgeted or anticipated, that ensures we have sufficient cash flow throughout the year. He said there is also a building debt services reserve fund of$30,000 to cover larger Council Regular Meeting 01-08-2013 Page 3 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT expenses related to the facility. This fund allows us to respond quickly to needs such as water damage or other emergencies as they may arise and helps as insurance to make sure payments are made should one of the entities not make a payment on time. He said that entity would be responsible to replenish the fund. Mr. Koudelka clarified that our cash reserve is a percentage of the operating costs paid into the operating reserve.Mayor Towey invited public comments. Nancy Hill, SCRAPS Director thanked Council and staff for going through the process and working out the language on the interlocal agreement. She said the staff she has worked with have been thoughtful, helpful and thorough and that SCRAPS is looking forward to continuing service in Spokane Valley. Councilmember Woodard said he thinks the contract is good and thanked Nancy Hill for continually reducing cost and that he looks forward to the new structure for the animals. Councilmember Wick said the contract has come a long way since we first started and he thinks it is a great regional model. Councilmember Schimmels commended SCRAPS and the County for the past nine years of smooth operating with their service and thanked staff for all the hours put into negotiating the contract. Vote by Acclamation:In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion Passes. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mayor Towey invited public comments.No comments were offered. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: 4.Advance Agenda—Mayor Towey No comments. INFORMATION ONLY The Department Monthly Reports and Planning Commission Minutes of November 8, 2012, were for information only and were not reported or discussed. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:N/A 7.EXECUTIVE SESSION: Pending/Potential Litigation [RCW 42.30.110(1)(i)] It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn into Executive Session for approximately thirty minutes to discuss pending/potential litigation, and that no action will be taken upon return to open session. Council adjourned into executive session at 7:07 p.m. At approximately 7:37 p.m., Deputy City Attorney announced that the meeting would be extended another ten minutes. Mayor Towey declared Council out of Executive Session at 7:49; after which it was moved by Councilmember Wick, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. ATTEST: Thomas E.Towey,Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Council Regular Meeting 01-08-2013 Page 4 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT MINUTES City of Spokane Valley City Council Executive Session Tuesday,January 15,2013 Attendance: Councilmembers: Staff: Tom Towey,Mayor Mike Jackson,City Manager Gary Schimmels,Deputy Mayor Cary Driskell, City Attorney Dean Grafos, Councilmember Chuck Hafner, Councilmember Ben Wick, Councilmember Arne Woodard, Councilmember EXECUTIVE SESSION: Mayor Towey called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. I t was then moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn into executive session for approximately sixty minutes to evaluate the qualifications of candidates for appointment to elective office [RCW 42.30.110(1)(h)J, and that action is anticipated thereafter during the regular 6:00 p.m. council meeting. Council adjourned into executive session at 5:03 p.m. At approximately 5:49 p.m., Mayor Towey declared council out of executive session and it was then moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 5:50 p.m. Thomas E.Towey,Mayor ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge,City Clerk Council Minutes:01-15-2013 Page 1 of 1 Approved by Council: DRAFT MINUTES SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STUDY SESSION FORMAT Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers Spokane Valley,Washington January 15,2013 6:00 p.m. Attendance: Councilmembers Staff Tom Towey,Mayor Mike Jackson,City Manager Gary Schimmels,Deputy Mayor Cary Driskell, City Attorney Dean Grafos,Councilmember Mark Calhoun,Finance Director Chuck Hafner, Councilmember John Hohman, Community Development Dir. Ben Wick, Councilmember Mike Stone,Parks&Recreation Director Arne Woodard, Councilmember Eric Guth,Public Works Director Scott Kuhta,Planning Manager Steve Worley, Senior Engineer Marty Palaniuk,Planning Technician Rick VanLeuven,Police Chief Carolbelle Branch,Public Information Officer Chris Bainbridge,City Clerk Mayor Towey called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Roll Call: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll;all Councilmembers were present. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Determination of Candidates to Interview for Interim Councilmember#1 Position—Mayor Towey After Mayor Towey explained the process for taking nominations, including that nominations require a second, and at least three councilmembers must vote for a candidate in order for that candidate to be interviewed, Mayor Towey opened the floor for nominations of candidates to interview. Councilmember Grafos nominated Rod Higgins, the nomination was seconded. Councilmember Wick nominated Linda Thompson, the nomination was seconded. Deputy Mayor Schimmels nominated Amy Biviano, there was no second. Councilmember Wick nominated Rustin Hall, there was no second. Councilmember Woodard nominated Sam Wood,the nomination was seconded. Councilmember Hafner nominated Amy Biviano, the nomination was seconded. Councilmember Woodard nominated Kevin Anderson, the nomination was seconded. Councilmember Wick nominated Jon Gibbs, there was no second. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to close the nominations. Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered. The following is the outcome of the vote on those candidates receiving a nomination and a second: 1. Candidate Rod Higgins: In Favor: Mayor Towey, Deputy Mayor Schimmels, and Councilmembers Hafner, Grafos and Woodard. Opposed: Councilmember Wick. This candidate will be interviewed. 2. Candidate Linda Thompson: In Favor: Mayor Towey, and Councilmembers Wick, Hafner, Grafos and Woodard. Opposed: Deputy Mayor Schimmels. This candidate will be interviewed. 3. Candidate Samuel Wood: In Favor: Mayor Towey, Deputy Mayor Schimmels, and Councilmembers Hafner,Grafos and Woodard. Opposed: Councilmember Wick. This candidate will be interviewed. Council Study Session Minutes 01-15-2013 Page 1 of 3 Approved by Council: DRAFT 4. Candidate Amy Biviano: In Favor: Mayor Towey, Deputy Mayor Schimmels, and Councilmembers Hafner, Grafos and Wick. Opposed: Councilmember Woodard. This candidate will be interviewed. 5. Candidate Kevin Anderson: In Favor: Councilmembers Grafos, Hafner, and Woodard. Opposed: Mayor Towey, Deputy Mayor Schimmels, and Councilmember Wick. This candidate will be interviewed. NON-ACTION ITEMS 2. Code Text Amendments CTA 04-12—Marty Palaniuk Planning Technician Palaniuk went over the issues what led to the proposed amendments concerning home occupations in the mixed use, commercial and industrial zones; accessory dwelling units in the mixed use, commercial and industrial zones; recreational vehicles in the mixed use, commercial and industrial zones; residential development standards in those same zones; and manufactured homes in manufactured home subdivisions. Councilmember Woodard asked about L&I (Labor and Industries) regulations concerning moving manufactured homes, and it was determined that staff will research that issue prior to the scheduled January 22,first reading. There were no objections from Council. 3. Shops/Storage Sheds in Residential Areas—Scott Kuhta,John Hohman Community Development Director Hohman explained that the issue of concern is an increasing citizen trend to build oversized shops with a small dwelling located within the structure;he said primary use as a shop is inconsistent with residential zone intent; that staff received some complaints of structures on Progress, and staff is concerned enough to try to do something a little different;that they took the issue to the Planning Commission for their input, and the Commission was unanimous in their feelings that this should be brought to council. After viewing photos of the structures via staff's PowerPoint, Planning Manager Kuhta said that previously 51% of the structure would have to be dedicated to dwelling,but that was not written in the Code and a subsequent Community Development Director felt it couldn't be enforced; and he said the issues are also the definitions. There was discussion concerning just building a shop on a lot; aggregating lots; the intention to use the structure solely for storage, and mention from Mr. Kuhta that in the past, this has led to such things as operating an auto body shop in a residential area. Councilmember Woodard suggested staff check the Millwood height limitations, and Councilmember Grafos went over his comments concerning shop buildings on residential lots, which he distributed as a handout. After further discussion,it was determined that staff will look at the issue of detached accessory structures, setbacks, and building heights,and that this issue will return to the Planning Commission. 4. Draft Interlocal Decant Facility—Eric Guth Public Works Director Guth went over the highlights of the draft interlocal agreement, including the estimated costs; and after brief discussion, it was determined hat staff will bring this interlocal for council approval consideration at the January 29 council meeting. Mayor Towey called for a short recess at 6:56 p.m.; and he reconvened the meeting at 7:06 p.m. 5. Street Preservation Project Change Order—Steve Worley Senior Engineer Worley went over the background of the Street Preservation Project, Phase 1 and of the subsequent bid award to Spokane Rock Products, and that the project was substantially completed September 5;that the current change order and accompanying documentation explain the current changes; that the cost of the overages increase the project cost above 15% of the bid contract price and therefore requires Council approval. Mr. Worley also noted that the bids came in below the engineer's estimate, which estimate was based on aerial photos instead of the normal topographic survey; and that the project was put together on short notice. Council agreed to staff bringing this back next week for Council approval consideration. Council Study Session Minutes 01-15-2013 Page 2 of 3 Approved by Council: DRAFT 6.Advance Agenda—Mayor Towey Councilmember Hafner asked about the status of school zone traffic beacons and grant opportunities, and Mr. Jackson said they will look into that issue for possible future discussion. Councilmember Grafos mentioned the swale project on Appleway and of past discussions on that topic at the 2011 retreat,where he said the matter was the highest priority,but that it has not moved forward since,and said a Fortune 500 company could be coming and he would like staff to bring back a plan to council to approve completing the remainder of the corridor,possibly this summer. Mr.Jackson said staff will research the issue. 7. Information Only: City Hall at the Mall Update was for information only and was not reported or discussed. 8. Council Check-in—Mayor Towey Mayor Towey said we have been requested to join with other jurisdictions to draft a letter to the Governor on a proposed transportation package, and said he favors that idea; he said several cities in King County agree with the idea; and that most favored three things that aligned with the AWC (Association of Washington Cities) transportation package, which package Mayor Towey explained, could benefit us in our pursuit of funding for Sullivan bridge; he said if all local jurisdictions would draft a common letter to the Governor,that a united voice going to Olympia would be more beneficial; he said cities and counties need to be given more tools in order to solve our transportation problems. Council discussion included several Councilmembers expressing the need for caution. Mayor Towey said some of the suggested proposals are to increase the Council's authority to raise vehicle tabs to $40;to increase the level of motor vehicle excise tax to share with cities, and increase the gas tax. Mayor Towey said such a letter could be general in nature, and prior to actual submittal, could be brought again before Council. Councilmember Wick said he would prefer to support the package if our letter listed specific items; and it was suggested that staff contact other jurisdictions for their input. Mr. Jackson said staff can handle that task as this is an important issue to as it ties in with our request for $4 million for Sullivan bridge; and added that he will contact the City's lobbyist Briahna Taylor for her expertise; that this is a good way to demonstrate regional support for the need for additional funding, and that staff can initiate the process. Council concurred. Mayor Towey also mentioned the selection process for the Community Recognition Program; and that the first presentation will be January 29;with the cutoff for the next month's nomination as February 5. 9. City Manager Comments—Mike Jackson City Manager Jackson said that staff has been working with Spokane County and the City of Spokane concerning solid waste; that they met last Monday and we have a draft Memorandum of Understanding; that our City Attorney has reviewed it and if possible, staff would like to bring that to Council next week for council approval consideration, and said he hopes to have a draft Scope of Work as well. There were no objections from Council. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 7:37 p.m. ATTEST: Thomas E.Towey,Mayor Christine Bainbridge,City Clerk Council Study Session Minutes 01-15-2013 Page 3 of 3 Approved by Council: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 22,2013 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ®new business ❑public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin.report ❑pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First Reading Proposed Ordinance 13-001, Amending SVMC Title 19.40, 19.60,and 19.70. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A.106; SVMC 17.80.150 and 19.30.040 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Administrative report BACKGROUND: This amendment is intended to clarify issues in the SVMC that have previously been addressed and/or allowed Director Interpretations or management decisions. This amendment seeks to formalize these decisions by addressing the following areas in the SVMC: 1. Home occupations in the mixed use,commercial and industrial zones; 2. Accessory Dwelling Units in the mixed use,commercial and industrial zones; 3. Recreational Vehicles in the mixed use,commercial and industrial zones; 4. Residential development standards in the Mixed Use Center and Corridor Mixed Use zones; 5. Manufactured homes in manufactured home subdivisions. On November 8,2012,the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the amendment. Following public testimony and deliberations,the Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the amendment. On January 15,2013 staff provided an administrative report to City Council. Council consensus was to move the amendment to a First Ordinance Reading. OPTIONS: Proceed as proposed,or as modified;or direct staff further. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Move to advance Ordinance 13-001 to a second reading. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:None STAFF CONTACT: Lori Barlow, Senior Planner; Martin Palaniuk,Planning Technician ATTACHMENTS: 1 —Presentation 2- Draft Ordinance 13-001 3—backup materials (Planning Commission Findings, Staff Report) CITYHALp5P4NANP�r - •. Department of Community Development Valle Planning Division City Council 1St Reading, Ordinance 13 -001 January 22, 2013 City Initiated Code Text Amendment SVMC 19.40, 19.60 and 19.70 (CTA-04- 12) artment of Communit . De �--�.• Spokane p Y Develo ment p '.� 111e) Planning Division z , Planning Commission 's Recommendation Approve ordinance to: • Allow "Used" manufactured homes that are similar in type to be placed in "Manufactured Home Subdivisions" • Permit Home Occupations to occur in any legally permitted residence regardless of the zoning • Allow Accessory Dwelling Units in all zones that permit single-family dwellings • Allow guest use of RVs for up to 30 days at any residence regardless of the zoning • Establish residential standards for residential development in the CMU and MUC zones . DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 13-001 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON AMENDING SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS 19.40.120, 19.40.140, 19.60.010, 19.70.010, AND 19.70.020 TO ALLOW HOME OCCUPATIONS, ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS AND RECREATIONAL VEHICLES IN MIXED USE, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONES; TO ALLOW USED MANUFACTURED HOMES IN MANUFACTURED HOME SUBDIVISIONS; TO INCLUDE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR MIXED USE ZONES, AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, on September 25, 2007, the City of Spokane Valley (City) adopted Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC)Title 19,pursuant to Ordinance 07-015; and WHEREAS,on October 28,2007, SVMC Title 19 became effective;and WHEREAS, such regulations are authorized by RCW 36.70A; and WHEREAS, the amendments set forth below are consistent with the goals and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, on October 19, 2012 and October 26, 2012, notice of the Planning Commission public hearing was published in the Valley News Herald; and WHEREAS, on October 25, 2012, the Washington State Department of Commerce was notified pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106,providing a 60-day notice of intent to adopt amendments to the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS,on October 25,2012,the Planning Commission held a study session; and WHEREAS, SVMC 19.40.040, 19.40.120, 19.60.010, 19.70.010 and 19.70.020, as amended, bear a substantial relation to the public health, safety and welfare and protection of the environment; and WHEREAS, on November 8, 2012, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, received evidence, information, public testimony, and a staff report with a recommendation followed by deliberations and provided a recommendation; and WHEREAS, on December 13, 2012, the Planning Commission approved the findings and recommendations; and WHEREAS,on January 15,2013,City Council reviewed the proposed amendment; and WHEREAS, on January 22, 2013, City Council considered a first ordinance reading to adopt the proposed amendment. NOW,THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley do ordain as follows: Ordinance 13-001 Page 1 of 10 DRAFT Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend SVMC 19.40.040, 19.40.120, 19.60.010, 19.70.010 and 19.70.020. Section 2. Findings. The City Council acknowledges that the Planning Commission conducted appropriate investigation and study, held a public hearing on the proposed amendments and recommends approval of the amendments. The City Council hereby adopts the findings of the Planning Commission, specifically that: Growth Management Act Policies 1. The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) provides that each city shall adopt a comprehensive land use plan and development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan. City of Spokane Valley Goals and Policies 2. The City of Spokane Valley has adopted goals and policies consistent with the GMA and adopted CWPP. Land Use Goal LUG-9: Encourage the development of Mixed-use areas that foster community identity and are designed to support pedestrian,bicycle and regional transit. Land Use Policy LUP-9.2: The mix of land uses allowed in either the Corridor Mixed-use or Mixed-use Center designation should include: • A full range of retail goods and services including grocery stores, theaters/entertainment,restaurants,personal services and specialty shops; • Public/quasi-public uses • Commercial uses that require large land uses but have low employment density and are auto-dependent, such as lumber yards, plant nurseries, warehouses and auto dealerships, should be prohibited from either Mixed-use category. Housing Goal HG-1: Encourage diversity in design to meet the housing needs of the residents of the community and region. Housing Policy HP-1.1: Consider the economic impact of development regulations on the cost of housing. Housing Policy HP-1.2: Streamline the development review process and strive to eliminate unnecessary time delays and expenses. Housing Policy HP-1.3: Establish development regulations and incentives for greater diversity of housing types,costs and designs,that may include bonus incentives, clustering,and transfer of development rights. Housing Policy HP-1.4: Encourage mixed-use residential/commercial development in designated areas throughout the City with the use of developer incentives and design standards. Economic Goal EDG-7: Maintain a regulatory environment that offers flexibility, consistency,predictability and clear direction. Economic Policy EDP-7.1: Evaluate,monitor and improve development standards to promote compatibility between adjacent land uses;and update permitting processes to ensure that they are equitable,cost-effective, and expeditious. Economic Policy EDP-7.2: Review development regulations periodically to ensure clarity,consistency and predictability. Ordinance 13-001 Page 2 of 10 DRAFT Neighborhood Goal NG-2: Preserve and protect the character of Spokane Valley's residential neighborhoods. Neighborhood Policy NP-2.1: Maintain and protect the character of existing and future residential neighborhoods through the development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations and joint planning. Neighborhood Policy NP-2.2: Review and revise as necessary, existing land use regulations to provide for innovation and flexibility in the design of new residential developments, accessory dwelling units, and in-fill development. Section 3. Spokane Valley Municipal Code 19.40.120 is amended as follows: 19.40.120 Manufactured housing A. Pursuant to the requirements of RCW 35.21.684,the City does not discriminate against consumers' choices in the placement or use of a home that is not equally applicable to all homes. This section applies only to manufactured housing units placed on individual lots. B. Homes built to 42 U.S.C. 70 Sections 5401 through 5403 standards(as they may be amended) are regulated for the purposes of siting in the same manner as site-built homes, factory-built homes,or homes built to any other state construction or local design standard;provided,however,that the manufactured home shall: 1.Be a new manufactured home; and 2.Be set upon a permanent foundation, as specified by the manufacturer, and that the space from the bottom of the home to the ground be enclosed by concrete or an approved product which can be either load-bearing or decorative; and 3. Comply with all local design standards,including the requirement for a pitched roof with a slope of not less than 3:12,applicable to all other homes within the neighborhood in which the manufactured home is to be located; and 4.Be thermally equivalent to the state energy code; and 5. Otherwise meet all other requirements for a designated manufactured home as defined in RCW 35.63.160. C. This section does not override any legally recorded covenants or deed restrictions of record. A"new manufactured home"means any manufactured home required to be titled under RCW Title 46,which has not been previously titled to a retail purchaser,and is not a used mobile home as defined in RCW 82.45.032(2). A"designated manufactured home"is a manufactured home constructed after June 15, 1976,in accordance with state and federal requirements for manufactured homes,which: 1. Is comprised of at least two fully enclosed parallel sections each of not less than 12 feet wide by 36 feet long; and 2.Was originally constructed with and now has a composition or wood shake or shingle, coated metal,or similar roof of nominal 3:12 pitch; and 3.Has exterior siding similar in appearance to siding materials commonly used on conventional site-built International Building Code single-family residences. D.An existing single wide manufactured home may be replaced with a new single wide manufactured home when replacement is initiated within 12 months of the date of damage which represents less than 80 percent of market value,or removal of existing habitable manufactured home. E. Manufactured homes with dimensional features that match or closely match the predominant manufactured home type within a manufactured home subdivision may be placed in the manufactured home subdivision without regard to the age of the manufactured home. Ordinance 13-001 Page 3 of 10 DRAFT Section 4. Spokane Valley Municipal Code 19.40.040 is amended as follows: 19.40.140 Home occupations A. Applicability. Any person, group or entity conducting a "for profit" enterprise from a location whose primary use is a residence must obtain a home occupation permit. A home occupation may be established in a residence that has been legally permitted. Businesses may be exempt from the home occupation permit fee, as established by the master fee schedule,if all of the following criteria are met: 1. There are no proposed exterior alterations to the residence or any accessory structure(s) which change the residential character of the property; 2. Goods and commodities associated with the business are not delivered to the premises; 3. There are no business customers visiting the premises; 4. There are no signs or window displays on the property related to the business; and 5. Any employees engaged in the business must live in the residence (no outside employees). B. Home occupations are permitted as accessory uses, except as indicated by subsection C of this section, incidental to the property's principal use as a residence, subject to the following requirements: 1. Property shall retain a residential appearance and character; 2.All storage shall be enclosed within the residence or accessory structure; 3. There shall be a limit of two employees not residing on the premises engaged in the home occupation; 4. One unlighted sign placed flush against the exterior wall of the principal structure not exceeding four square feet in area is permitted; 5. There shall be no window display nor shall sample commodities with the exception of flowers and produce grown on the premises be displayed outside the building(s); 6. The hours of operation of a home occupation are limited to 7:00 a.m.to 10:00 p.m.; 7. The home occupation use shall not create electronic interference including, but not limited to, interference with radio, satellite reception, telephone or television reception, nor generate measurable levels at the property line of noise, dust, smoke, odor or glare. The home occupation activity shall not generate solid waste in volume or type which is not normally associated with residential use unless specifically permitted; 8. Loading docks and mechanical loading devices are not permitted; 9. No traffic or parking of vehicles shall be generated by a home occupation in greater volumes than normally expected in a residential neighborhood and any need for parking must be accommodated within the required off-street parking for the dwelling unit; and 10. Uses which are detrimental to the existing residential appearance and character are not allowed as home occupations. C. Specific uses which are not permitted as home occupations include, but are not limited to, the following: adult retail use establishment, adult bookstore or adult entertainment establishment; auto repair; welding or metal plating shops; large appliance/electronics or equipment repair or service; small engine repair; truck hauling and/or tow storage yard; vehicle sales; cabinet making; manufacturing and/or related storage; kennel or stables; wholesale or retail sales; and restaurants/drinking establishments. Ordinance 13-001 Page 4 of 10 DRAFT Section 5. Spokane Valley Municipal Code 19.60.010 is amended as follows: 19.60.010 General requirements A. Nonresidential development shall meet the minimum setback and the maximum height requirements shown in Table 19.60-1. B. Residential development shall meet the minimum residential development standards for the MF-2 zone shown in Table 19.40-1 with the exception that the following setbacks shall apply (NOTE: alternate setbacks apply to multi-family adjacent to single-family uses or zoning. See 19.60.070 and 19.60.080): Front yard setback: 20 feet Rear yard setback: 10 feet Side yard setback: 5 feet Side yard—Flanking street setback: 20 feet Residential use adjacent to a nonresidential use Side yard(without living space window): 5 feet Side yard(with living space window): 10 feet C. A home occupation may be established in a residence that has been legally permitted, excluding caretaker dwellings. D. Attached and detached Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) are permitted in all zoning districts that permit single-family dwellings and shall adhere to the appearance of single- family residences. An attached ADU is an accessory dwelling unit that has one or more vertical and/or horizontal walls in common with, or attached to, the principal dwelling unit. A detached ADU is a freestanding accessory dwelling unit that is not attached or physically connected to the principal dwelling unit. Accessory dwelling units shall meet all provisions contained in SVMC 19.40.100, E. Recreational vehicles shall not be used as permanent or temporary dwelling units in any mixed use or commercial zone except in manufactured home parks. Guests may park and/or occupy a recreational vehicle while visiting the occupants of a dwelling unit located on the same lot for not more than 30 days in one consecutive 12-month period. The intent is to accommodate visiting guests and not to allow the recreational vehicle to be used as a dwelling unit. F. Parking areas shall be paved and landscaped in accordance with Chapter 22.50 SVMC. GG. New development exceeding three stories in height shall be provided with paved service lanes not less than 16 feet in width. DH.All new development shall provide for shared access with adjacent properties. I. All outdoor trash, garbage and refuse storage areas shall be screened on all sides visible to public views or rights-of-way with a minimum five-and-one-half-foot-high concrete block or masonry wall or sight-obscuring fence with a sight-obscuring gate and two feet of Type II landscaping in accordance with Figure 22.70-8 SVMC. RI. The following structures may be erected above the height limits of this code in the Office, Commercial, and Mixed Use zones, provided: (1) the structure is accessory to or part of a building which is a permitted use in the zone; (2)the structure complies with the height limits in the Airport Overlay zone; and (3) no residential use of the structure shall occur above the height limits prescribed in the zone: 1. Penthouses or roof structures for the housing of elevators, stairways, tanks, ventilating fans,or similar equipment to operate and maintain a building. 2. Fire or parapet walls, skylights, flagpoles, chimneys, church steeples, belfries, wireless masts, and similar structures. Ordinance 13-001 Page 5 of 10 DRAFT 3. Structures such as silos, feed mills, batch plants, and fixed cranes which are used in a manufacturing process which utilizes vertical processing and storage of materials. 4.Water stand pipes and tanks. I GK. The following features attached to structures are allowed as exceptions to the setback standards: 1. Minor Projections Allowed. Minor features of a structure, such as eaves, chimneys, fire escapes, bay windows no more than 12 feet long and which cantilever beyond the foundation of the structure, uncovered stairways, wheelchair ramps and uncovered decks or balconies,may extend into a required structure setback up to 20 percent of the depth of the setback. However, they may not be within three feet of a lot line when a setback is required. 2. Full Projections Allowed. In addition to subsection (G)(1) of this section,the following features are allowed to project farther into the required structure setback: a. Canopies,marquees, awnings and similar features may fully extend into a street setback and may extend into the public right-of-way subject to the requirements of the building code and adopted street standards. b. Uncovered stairways and wheelchair ramps that lead to one entrance on the street- facing facade of a building may fully extend into a street setback. c. Uncovered decks and stairways that are no more than 42 inches above the ground may fully extend into a required structure setback. d. On lots that slope down from the street, vehicular and pedestrian entry bridges that are no more than 42 inches above the average sidewalk elevation may fully extend into a required structure setback. e. Balconies may extend into public rights-of-way as allowed in the building code and adopted street standards. f. Attached mechanical equipment such as heat pumps, air conditioners, emergency generators and water pumps are allowed to project into the side or rear yard setback only. HL. Mobile food vendors with permission of the property owner, health certificate and permit. I 11VI. Community facilities and public utility distribution facility(ies), except power poles and underground transformers,shall comply with the following conditions: 1. The requirements for landscaping, signage,lighting and other requirements shall apply. 2. Type I landscape screening is required along property line(s) adjacent to a residential use or zone. I 4N. Public utility transmission facility shall comply with the following conditions: 1. The utility company shall secure the necessary property or right-of-way to assure for the property construction,continued maintenance, and general safety to the property adjoining the public utility transmission facility; 2. All support structures for electric transmission lines shall have their means of access located a minimum of 10 feet above ground; 3. The facilities shall be compatible with the surrounding uses either by distance, landscaping,buffering,or design, as determined by the director; and 4. The height of any structure above ground does not exceed 125 feet. I Section 6. Spokane Valley Municipal Code 19.70.010 is amended as follows: 19.70.010 I-1,Light Industrial district A. The Light Industrial designation is a planned industrial area with special emphasis and attention given to aesthetics, landscaping and internal and community compatibility. Typical uses would include technology and other low-impact industries. Light Industrial Ordinance 13-001 Page 6 of 10 DRAFT areas may also include office and commercial uses as ancillary uses within an overall plan for industrial development. B. Supplemental Regulations. 1. The outdoor storage provisions contained in SVMC 19.60.060(B) shall apply to the I-1 district. 2. Mobile food vendors shall be located on/within designated areas which do not interfere with parking or internal circulation with permission of the property owner, health certificate and permit. 3. Setbacks. a.Front and flanking street yard setbacks shall be 20 feet; and b. Side and rear yard setbacks of 35 feet are required only adjacent to residential zoning districts. 4. The following structures may be erected above the height limits of this code, provided: (a) the structure is accessory to or part of a building which is a permitted use in the zone; (b) the structure complies with the height limits in the Airport Overlay zone; and (c) no residential use of the structure shall occur above the height limits prescribed in the zone: a. Penthouses or roof structures for the housing of elevators, stairways, tanks, ventilating fans,or similar equipment to operate and maintain a building. b. Fire or parapet walls, skylights, flagpoles, chimneys, church steeples, belfries, wireless masts,and similar structures. c. Structures such as silos, feed mills, batch plants, and fixed cranes which are used in a manufacturing process which utilizes vertical processing and storage of materials. d.Water stand pipes and tanks. 5.All parking,maneuvering and outdoor storage areas shall be paved. Exemptions: a. Parking and storage areas routinely used by cleated and other heavy equipment as approved by the planning director. b. The planning director may waive portions of these requirements upon recommendation by the Spokane regional clean air agency or the Spokane Valley development engineering division when it can be demonstrated that the proposed surfacing, such as grass pavers or other technology, will not adversely affect air quality, water quality or the integrity of the parking area. 6. The following features attached to structures are allowed as exceptions to the setback standards: a. Minor Projections Allowed. Minor features of a structure, such as eaves, chimneys, fire escapes, bay windows no more than 12 feet long and which cantilever beyond the foundation of the structure, uncovered stairways, wheelchair ramps and uncovered decks or balconies,may extend into a required structure setback up to 20 percent of the depth of the setback. However, they may not be within three feet of a lot line when a setback is required. b. Full Projections Allowed. In addition to subsection (B)(6)(a) of this section, the following features are allowed to project farther into the required structure setback: i. Canopies, marquees, awnings and similar features may fully extend into a street setback and may extend into the public right-of-way subject to the requirements of the building code and adopted street standards. ii. Uncovered stairways and wheelchair ramps that lead to one entrance on the street- facing facade of a building may fully extend into a street setback. iii. Uncovered decks and stairways that are no more than 42 inches above the ground may fully extend into a required structure setback. Ordinance 13-001 Page 7 of 10 DRAFT iv. On lots that slope down from the street,vehicular and pedestrian entry bridges that are no more than 42 inches above the average sidewalk elevation may fully extend into a required structure setback. v. Balconies may extend into public rights-of-way as allowed in the building code and adopted street standards. vi. Attached mechanical equipment such as heat pumps, air conditioners, emergency generators and water pumps are allowed to project into the side or rear yard setback only. 7. Community facilities and public utility distribution facility(ies), except power poles and underground transformers,shall comply with the following conditions: a. The requirements for landscaping, signage,lighting and other requirements shall apply. b. Type I landscape screening is required along property line(s) adjacent to a residential use or zone. 8. Public utility transmission facility shall comply with the following conditions: a. The utility company shall secure the necessary property or right-of-way to assure for the property construction,continued maintenance, and general safety to the property adjoining the public utility transmission facility; b. All support structures for electric transmission lines shall have their means of access located a minimum of 10 feet above ground; c. The facilities shall be compatible with the surrounding uses either by distance, landscaping,buffering,or design,as determined by the director; and d. The height of any structure above ground does not exceed 125 feet. 9. The following shall apply to all secondhand stores and consignment sales: a. The subject parcel must have frontage on an arterial; and b.Minimum building size of 15,000 gross square feet(gsf); and c. Limited to a single tenant. 10. A home occupation may be established in a residence that has been legally permitted, excluding caretaker dwellings. 11. Recreational vehicles shall not be used as permanent or temporary dwelling units. Guests may park and/or occupy a recreational vehicle while visiting the occupants of a dwelling unit located on the same lot for not more than 30 days in one consecutive 12- month period. The intent is to accommodate visiting guests and not to allow the recreational vehicle to be used as a dwelling unit. Section 7. Spokane Valley Municipal Code 19.70.010 is amended as follows: 19.70.020 I-2,Heavy Industrial district A. Heavy Industrial designated property is characterized by intense industrial activities which include manufacturing, processing, fabrication, assembly, freight handling and similar operations.Heavy industry may have significant noise,odor or aesthetic impacts. B. Supplemental Regulations. 1. I-2 allows any use permitted in the I-1 zoning district, except as specifically provided in Appendix 19-A. 2. Mobile food vendors shall be located on/within designated areas which do not interfere with parking or internal circulation with permission of the property owner, health certificate and permit. 3. The following structures may be erected above the height limits of this code, provided: (a) the structure is accessory to or part of a building which is a permitted use in the zone; (b) the structure complies with the height limits in the Airport Overlay zone; and (c) no residential use of the structure shall occur above the height limits prescribed in the zone: a. Penthouses or roof structures for the housing of elevators, stairways, tanks, ventilating fans,or similar equipment to operate and maintain a building. Ordinance 13-001 Page 8 of 10 DRAFT b. Fire or parapet walls, skylights, flagpoles, chimneys, church steeples, belfries, wireless masts, and similar structures. c. Structures such as silos, feed mills, batch plants, and fixed cranes which are used in a manufacturing process which utilizes vertical processing and storage of materials. d. Water stand pipes and tanks. 4.All parking,maneuvering and outdoor storage areas shall be paved. Exemptions: a. Parking and storage areas routinely used by cleated and other heavy equipment as approved by the planning director. b. The planning director may waive portions of these requirements upon recommendation by the Spokane regional clean air agency or the Spokane Valley development engineering division when it can be demonstrated that the proposed surfacing, such as grass pavers or other technology, will not adversely affect air quality, water quality or the integrity of the parking area. 5. The following features attached to structures are allowed as exceptions to the setback standards: a. Minor Projections Allowed. Minor features of a structure, such as eaves, chimneys, fire escapes, bay windows no more than 12 feet long and which cantilever beyond the foundation of the structure, uncovered stairways, wheelchair ramps and uncovered decks or balconies,may extend into a required structure setback up to 20 percent of the depth of the setback. However, they may not be within three feet of a lot line when a setback is required. b. Full Projections Allowed. In addition to subsection (B)(5)(a) of this section, the following features are allowed to project farther into the required structure setback: i. Canopies, marquees, awnings and similar features may fully extend into a street setback and may extend into the public right-of-way subject to the requirements of the building code and adopted street standards. ii. Uncovered stairways and wheelchair ramps that lead to one entrance on the street- facing facade of a building may fully extend into a street setback. iii. Uncovered decks and stairways that are no more than 42 inches above the ground may fully extend into a required structure setback. iv. On lots that slope down from the street,vehicular and pedestrian entry bridges that are no more than 42 inches above the average sidewalk elevation may fully extend into a required structure setback. v. Balconies may extend into public rights-of-way as allowed in the building code and adopted street standards. 6. Community facilities and public utility distribution facility(ies), except power poles and underground transformers,shall comply with the following conditions: a. The requirements for landscaping, signage,lighting and other requirements shall apply. b. Type I landscape screening is required along property line(s) adjacent to a residential use or zone. 7. Public utility transmission facility shall comply with the following conditions: a. The utility company shall secure the necessary property or right-of-way to assure for the property construction,continued maintenance, and general safety to the property adjoining the public utility transmission facility; b. All support structures for electric transmission lines shall have their means of access located a minimum of 10 feet above ground; c. The facilities shall be compatible with the surrounding uses either by distance, landscaping,buffering,or design,as determined by the director; and d. The height of any structure above ground does not exceed 125 feet. Ordinance 13-001 Page 9 of 10 DRAFT 8. A home occupation may be established in a residence that has been legally permitted, excluding caretaker dwellings. 9. Recreational vehicles shall not be used as permanent or temporary dwelling units. Guests may park and/or occupy a recreational vehicle while visiting the occupants of a dwelling unit located on the same lot for not more than 30 days in one consecutive 12- month period. The intent is to accommodate visiting guests and not to allow the recreational vehicle to be used as a dwelling unit. Section 8. All other provisions of SVMC Title 19 not specifically referenced hereto shall remain in full force and effect. Section 9. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 10. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provided by law. Passed by the City Council this day of February,2013. Mayor, Thomas E. Towey ATTEST: City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 13-001 Page 10 of 10 ATTACHMENT A FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMIVIISSION December 13,2012 The following findings are consistent with the Planning Commission's decision to recommend approval. Background: 1, Spokane Valley development regulations were adopted in September 2007 and became effective on October 28,2007. 2. The city-initiated code text amendment proposes to amend Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC) 19.40,120, 19.40.140, 19.60.010, 19.70.010, and 19.70.020 in order to clarify home occupations in nonresidential zones; clarify Accessory Dwelling Units (ADD) in nonresidential zones; clarify Recreational Vehicle(RV)use in nonresidential zones; establish residential development standards in nonresidential zones; establish standards for manufactured homes in manufactured home subdivisions. . 3. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on November 8, 2012 and voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the amendment to City Council, Planning Commission Findings: 1. Compliance with SVMC 17.80.150F Approval Criteria a. The proposed city initiated code text amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan; Finding(s): i, Land Use Goal LUG-9: Encourage the development of Mixed-use areas that foster community identity and are designed to support pedestrian, bicycle and regional transit. ii. Land Use Policy LUP-9.2: The mix of land uses allowed in either the Corridor Mixed-use or Mixed-use Center designation should include: • A full range of retail goods and services including grocery stores,theaters/entertainment, restaurants,personal services and specialty shops; o Public/quasi-public uses o Commercial uses that require large land uses but have low employment density and are auto-dependent, such as lumber yards, plant nurseries, warehouses and auto dealerships, should be prohibited from either Mixed-use category, iii. Housing Goal HG-1; Encourage diversity in design to meet the housing needs of the residents of the community and region. iv. Housing Policy HP-L1: Consider the economic impact of development regulations on the cost of housing, v. Housing Policy HP-1,2: Streamline the development review process and strive to eliminate unnecessary time delays and expenses. vi. Housing Policy HP-1.3: Establish development regulations and incentives for greater diversity of housing types, costs and designs, that may include bonus incentives, clustering, and transfer of development rights. vii. Housing Policy HP-1.4: Encourage mixed-use residential/commercial development in designated areas throughout the City with the use of developer incentives and design standards. Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission Page 1 of 3 ATTACHMENT A viii. Economic Goal EDG-7: Maintain a regulatory environment that offers flexibility, consistency,predictability and clear direction. ix. Economic Policy EDP-7.: Evaluate, monitor and improve development standards to promote compatibility between adjacent land uses; and update permitting processes to ensure that they are equitable,cost-effective, and expeditious. x, Economic Policy EDP-7.2: Review development regulations periodically to ensure clarity, consistency and predictability. xi. Neighborhood Goal NG-2: Preserve and protect the character of Spokane Valley's residential neighborhoods. xii. Neighborhood Policy NP-2.1: Maintain and protect the character of existing and future residential neighborhoods through the development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations and joint planning. xi ii, Neighborhood Policy NP-2.2: Review and revise as necessary,existing land use regulations to provide for innovation and flexibility in the design of new residential developments, accessory dwelling units,and in-fill development. b. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. Fi nding(s): i. Allowing used manufactured homes to be placed in manufactured home subdivisions will increase affordable housing options. Consistency with the type and size of predominant homes found in the subdivision would be preferred. ii. Home occupations are permitted in any legally established dwelling in all residential zones. Allowing a home occupation to occur in a legally permitted residence regardless of the zone provides residents with flexibility in housing decisions and provides a use normally associated with a dwelling, iii. MCJC and CMU zones permit residential development. Establishing residential development standards for these zones will provide regulatory consistency and certainty for future development. iv. Accessory Dwelling Units are permitted as an accessory use to a single-family residence. Allowing ADUs in CMU and MUC zones will provide property owners with increased housing options and may result in more affordable housing. v. Temporary RV use is permitted in all residential zones, RVs are typically used in residential areas when visiting family or friends. Allowing temporary RV use at any residence regardless of zone will provide flexibility and consistency to residents, vi. The public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment are furthered by ensuring that the City's development regulations are consistent with goals and policies in the adopted Comprehensive Plan. 2. Conclusion(s): a. The proposed city initiated code text amendment is consistent with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan and the approval criteria contained in SVMC 17.80.150P. b. The Growth Management Act (GMA) stipulates that the comprehensive land use plan and development regulations shall be subject to continuing review and evaluation by the City. Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane valley Planning Commission Page 2 of 3 ATTACHMENT A Recommendations: The Spokane Valley Planning Commission therefore recommends City Council adopt the proposed city- initiated code text amendments to SVMC 19.40.120, 19.40.140, 19.60.010, 19.70.010, and 1970.020 as attached, App •+ved this 13`h d• of December,2012 16.-- �..J►1 - 3 Bil Bates,Chaim. 1 ATTEST aCLt ALI4a 414/ � ,De una Griffith,Aiitlistrative Assistant • Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission Page 3 of 3 . CaliilIU\1Tv DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DlVlstoN Siiejkane all STAFF REPORT AND RECONTMENDATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CTA..04-12 STAFF REPORT DATE: October 17, 2012 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: November 8,2012, beginning at 6:00 p.m.,Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers, Valley Redwood Plaza Building, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 101, Spokane Valley, Washington 99206, PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: A city initiated text amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 19.60 to clarify home occupations in nonresidential zones; clarify Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) in nonresidential zones; clarify Recreational Vehicle (RV) use in nonresidential zones; establish residential development standards in nonresidential zones; establish standards for manufactured homes in manufactured home subdivisions. PROPONENT: City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Suite 106,Spokane Valley,WA 99206 APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC) Title 17 General Provisions. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Division recommends the Planning Commission forward the code text amendment as proposed by staff to the city council for approval. STAFF PLANNER: Martin Palaniuk, Planning Technician,Community Development Department REVIEWED in':Scott Kuhta,ATCP,Planning Manager, Community Development Department A`1TACHII LENTS: Exhibit 1: Proposed text amendment to SVMC 19.40, SVMC 19,60 and SVMC I9.70 Exhibit 2: SVMC Table 19,40-I Exhibit 3: Community Development Director Interpretation Exhibit 4: Manufactured Housing Legislation Overview Exhibit 5: Home Occupation Standards Exhibit 6: Accessory Dwelling Unit Standards Exhibit 7: Approved Planning Commission minutes 10-25-2012 Exhibit 8: Approved Planning Commission minutes 11-08-2012 Exhibit 9: Planning Commission Findings and Recommendation A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. APPLICATION PROCESSING: SVMC Chapter 17,80, Permit Processing Procedures. The following summarizes application procedures for the proposal, Process Date Pre-Application Meeting: N/A Staff Report and Recommendation CTA-04-12 Process Date Application Submitted: N/A Determination of Completeness: N/A Published Notice of Public Hearing: 10/19/2012 and 10/26/2012 Sent Notice of Public Hearing to staff/agencies: 10/24/2012 Posted Notice of Public Hearing 10/24/2012 2. PROPOSAL BACKGROUND: The proposal is to modify Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC) 19.40,District Purpose and Supplemental Use Regulations—Residential Zones,SVMC 19.60, District Purpose and Supplemental Use Regulations—Comrmercial,Office and Mixed Use Zones, and SVMC 19.70,District Purpose and Supplemental Use Regulations—Industrial Zones. The following areas have not been fully addressed in the SVMC and require clarification. A brief description of the issue together with the intent of the proposed amendment is provided below: Manufactured Homes in Manufactured Home Subdivisions Issue: The code requires all nnanuufaclured!homes placed on individual lots to be"new". SVMC defines"new"as not previously titled or set on a property. Manufactured.Ironic subdivisions contain individual lots but are designed specifically to accommodate a manufactured home community. In most cases all the homes within the subdivision are manufactured homes. As written,the SVMC would not permit placing a"used"manufactured home within a manufactured home subdivision. Intent of Code Text Amendment: Allow a"used"manufactured home to be placed within a manufactured home subdivision. The amendment would require double-wide manufactured homes be placed in subdivisions with predominantly double-wide homes and would allow single- wide manufactured homes in subdivisions with predominantly single-wide homes. Home Occupations Issue: It is unclear whether a home occupation is permitted in a residence established in a nonresidential zone. Home occupations are a permitted accessory use allowed in all residential zones. The code provisions addressing home occupation is contained in the residential section of Title 19 but Is not addressed in the commercial,mixed ruse,office or industrial sections, CMU and MUC zones allow dwellings and legally established dwellings exist In other nonresidential zones. Intent of Code Text Amendment: Clarify the status of home occupations in the nonresidential zones. The proposed amendment clarifies the issue by allowing a home occupation to occur in any residence that has been legally permitted regardless of zone, Residential Development In MUC and CMU zones Issue: Mixed use zones permit single-family and multi-family residential development however, the mixed use section of the SVMC does not contain development standards for residential development. These standards include density, lot width, lot depth,building height, lot coverage, setback and open space requirements. In the absence of any standard the MF-2 zone standard for density has been applied in the past together with a Community Development Director Interpretation with respect to setbacks.(See attachment) Intent of Code Text Amendment: Provide a residential development standard for residential development in the MUC and CM U zone. The proposed amendment will refer to the Iv1F-2 standard contained in SVMC 19.40 as the standard for residential development in the MUC and Page 2 of 5 Staff Report and Recommendation CTA-0'1-12 CMU zones. The setback standards contained in the Director's Interpretation are added for consistency with past development. Accessory Dwelling Units Issue: It is unclear whether an accessory dwelling unit is permitted accessory to a single-family residence established in a nonresidential zone. Accessory dwelling units(ADU)are permitted in all the residential zoning districts. ADUs are addressed in the residential section of Title 19 but they are not addressed in the commercial,mixed use,office,or industrial sections. CMU and MUC zones allow single-family dwellings. Intent of Code Text Amendment: Clarify the status of accessory dwelling units in the nonresidential zones. The proposed amendment clarifies the issue by allowing an ADU to occur at any single-family residence that has been legally permitted in the MUC and CMU zone. Iteereattoual Vehicles Issue: The use of Recreational Vehicles in association with residential uses Is addressed in the residential section of the SVMC. Residential uses are permitted in mixed use zones and also occur as legal uses in other nonresidential zones. The SVMC does not address RV use outside of the residential section. Intent of Code Text Amendment: Allow the use of RVs at legally permitted residences in nonresidential zones. The proposed amendment establishes that an RV can be parked at a residence In a noncommercial zone consistent with the restrictions on RV use found In the residential zones. Staff's recommended draft code text language to SVMC 19.40,SVMC 19.60 and SVMC 19.70 has been included in Attachment A of the Request for Planning Commission Action(RPCA). D. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE TEXT AMENDMENT 1. Compliance with Title 17(General Provisions)of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code a. Findings: SVMC 17.80.150(F)Municipal Code Text Amendment Approval Criteria 1. The City may approve Municipal Code Text amendment, if it finds that (1) The proposed text amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan; Staff Analysis: The proposed amendment is consistent with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The amendment Is consistent with the Comprehensive plan goals for encouraging a mix of commemial and residential uses, providing affordable housing options, maintaining a flexible and consistent regulatory environment,and preserving and protecting neighborhoods. Relevant Comprehensive Plan goals and policies are shown below: Land Use Goal LUG-9: Encourage the development of Mixed-use areas that foster community identity and are designed to support pedestrian, bicycle and regional transit. Land Use Policy LUP-9.2: The mix of land uses allowed in either the Corridor Mixed-use or Mixed-use Center designation should include: Page 3 of 5 Staff Report and Recommendation CTA-d4-12 o A full range of retail goods and services including grocery stores, theaters/entertainment,restaurants,personal services and specialty shops; 41 Public/quasi-public uses o Commercial uses that require large land uses but have low employment density and are auto-dependent, such as lumber yards, plant nurseries, warehouses and auto dealerships,should be prohibited from either Mixed-use category, Housing Goal HG-1; Encourage diversity in design to meet the housing needs of the residents of the community and region. Housing Policy HP-1.1: Consider the economic impact of development regulations on the cost of housing. Housing Policy HP-1.2; Streamline the development review process and strive to eliminate unnecessary time delays and expenses, Housing Policy HP-1,3: Establish development regulations and incentives for greater diversity of housing types,costs and designs,that may include bonus incentives, clustering,and transfer of development rights. Housing Policy HP-1.4: Encourage mixed-use residential/commercial development in designated areas throughout the City with the use of developer incentives and design standards, Economic Goal EDO-7: Maintain a regulatory environment that offers flexibility, consistency,predictability and clear direction. Economic Policy EDP-7.: Evaluate,monitor and improve development standards to promote compatibility between adjacent land uses;and update permitting processes to ensure that they are equitable,cost-effective,and expeditious. Economic Policy EDP-7.2: Review development regulations periodically to ensure clarity,consistency and predictability. Neighborhood Goal NG-2: Preserve and protect the character of Spokane Valley's residential neighborhoods. Neighborhood Policy NP-2.1: Maintain and protect the character of existing and future residential neighborhoods through the development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations and joint planning. Neighborhood Policy NP-2.2: Review and revise as necessary,existing land use regulations to provide for innovation and flexibility in the design of new residential developments,accessory dwelling units,and in-fill development, (2) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health,safety, welfare,and protection of the environment; Analysis: The amendment bears substantial relation 10 public health, safety,welfare and protection of the environment. The proposed amendment will provide increased affordable housing options,expand home occupations,and establish a more consistent regulatory environment. b. Conclusion(s): The proposed text amendment is consistent with the approval criteria contained in the SVMC. 2. Finding and Conclusions Specific to Public Comments a. Findings: Page 4 of 5 Staff Report and Recommendation CTA-04-12 No public comments have been received to date. b. Conclusion(s): Public noticing was conducted as set forth in SVMC 17.80 for a Type IV application and has been deemed sufficient for this proposal. No concerns are noted, 3. Finding and Conclusions Specific to Agency Comments a. Findings: No agency comments have been received to date. b, Conclusion(s): c. Public noticing was conducted as set forth in SVMC 17.80 for a Type IV application and has been deemed sufficient for this proposal. No concerns are noted. C. OVERALL CONCLUSION The proposed code text amendment Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plans policies and goals. D. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Planning Division, after review and consideration of the submitted application and applicable approval criteria, recommends the proposal to allow home occupations and temporary RV use in all zoning districts with a legally permitted residence; to allow accessory dwelling units in all zoning districts that permit single-family dwellings; to establish residential development standards in the CMU and MUC zones; and to allow "used" manufactured homes in manufactured home subdivisions. Allowing used manufactured homes to be placed in manufactured home subdivisions will increase affordable housing options. Consistency with the type and size of predominant homes found in the subdivision would be preferred. 1-lome occupations are permitted in any legally established dwelling in all residential zones. Allowing a home occupation to occur in legally permitted residence regardless of zone provides residents wills flexibility in housing decisions and provides a use normally associated with a dwelling. MUC and CMU zones permit residential development. Establishing residential development standards for these zones will provide regulatory consistency and certainty for future development. Accessory Dwelling Units are permitted as an accessory use to a single-family residence. Allowing ADUs in CMU and MUC zones will provide property owners with increased housing options and may result in more affordable housing. Temporary RV use is permitted in all residential zones. RVs are typically used in residential areas when visiting family or friends. Allowing temporary RV use at any residence regardless of zone will provide flexibility and consistency to residents. E. RECOMMENDED MOTION The Planning Commission forwards the proposed code text amendment as recommended by staff to the city council for approval. Page 5 of 5 Exhlblt 2 - Table 19.40-1 Table 10.40-1 --Residential Zone Dimensional Standards(in Feet) R-1 R-2 R-3 R.4 MF-1 MF-2 PRO Single-Family Lot Underlying 40,000 10,000 7,500 6.000 3,600 2,000 ArealDwalling Unil zone Duplex Lot ArealDwelfing 6,000 5,000 Unit Lot Width 80 80 65s'J 50 45 20 30 Lot Depth 100 90 90 80 80 80 50 Minimum Front and Flanking Street Yard Setback V" 35 15 15 15 15 I 15 15 9 Garage Setbacks'" 35 20 20 20 20 20 20 i Rear Yard Setback Io 20 20 20 20 10 10 15 Side Yard Setback(`y'1 5 5 8 5 5 5 I 5 Open Space 10%gross area Lot Coverage 30.0% 50.0% 50.0% 65.0% 60.0% 65.0% 60.0% Maximum Underlying Building Height(in Feet) 35 35 35 35 40 50 zone No accessory structure shall be located In the front or flanking street yard, and shall be set back not less than five feet from any side or rear yard. Attached garages,where the garage door does not face the street, may have the same setback as the principal structure. Setbacks,when adjacent to a private road or driveway easement,are established from the inner edges of the road or driveway and are the same as noted above except the flanking read which would be five feel. (s' Duplex lots in R-3 zones may be a minimum of 60 feet in width. Exhibit 3a- Director Decision Memorandum TO: Community Development Department FROM: Kathy McClung,Director DATE: August 5,2008 RE: Setbacks for single family residential in Mixed Use Center(MUC)Zone Recently the Development Regulations were altered to allow single and multi-family units in the MUC. Table 19.60-1 addresses setbacks in the MUC for commercial uses but does not address residential uses, Therefore,time following setback will apply: Front yard setback:20 feet Rear Yard setback: 10 feet Side Yard Flanking street: 20 feet Side Yard: 5 feet w/out living space window; 10 feet with living space window. No accessory structure shall be in the front or flanking street yard. Otherwise, they may be setback a minimum of 5 feet from the property line. This decision is made under the authority of Section 17.50,010 of the Spokane Valley City Code. Final 9122!08 Exhibit 3b - Director interpretation Memorandum TO: Community Development Departanent 111OM: Kathy McClung,Director V\f4j DATE: December 4,2008 Itl?; Setbacks for residential development in Mixed.-use Center(IVI;UC)and Corridor Mixed Use(CMU)Zones On August 5,2008 Imade an administrative detertuivatlon regarding setbacks for single family residential development In the Mixed Use Center(MUC)zoning district. This determination updates the August 5h determination to include residential development in the Corridor Mixed Use(CMU)zoning district. Table 19,60-1 lrr the Spokane Valley M4urieipai Code addresses setbacks inure MUC and CMU zoning dist dots that apply tb commercial uses,however Table 19.60-] does not address setbacks for kesidential uses that are allowed in the districts. Therefore the following setbacks shall apply to residential uses in the MUC and CMU zoning districts: ( Front yard setback: 20 feet Rear yard setback: 10 feet Side yard-L ianking street setback: 20 feet Side yard(without living space window): 5 feet Side yard(with living space window): 10 feet No accessory structure shall be In the front or flanking street yard. Otherwise they shall be setback a nrininmr>z of 5 feet front the property line. This decision is made under the authority of Section 17,50.010 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. • l 7 P:1CommuuityDavelopmeakCurrent Pfau ning MUC-CMtitsetback Meinnranduin,doc i21df2008 Exhibit 4 - MN Legislation overview Introduction and Overview of Manufactured Housing Legislation 2004 Leglslntion Sets New Direction for Manufactured Housing Regulation The 2004 legislature significantly changed the landscape of local land use regulation of manufactured homes by the passage of SB 6593(Laws of 2004,eh.256),which became effective on July 1, 2005.This law requires that,to protect"consumers'choices in housing,"cities and counties trust regulate manufactured homes built to federal manufactured housing construction standards no differently than they regulate other types of homes. A second impetus for the 2004 legislation was, according to the legislative intent expressed in Section 1 of SB 6593,to provide for"affordable homeownership and rental housing."Whatever one's views regarding manufactured housing,it cannot be disputed that manufactured housing today is quite different from the mobile homes of twenty or thirty years ago or more, "Mobile homes,"as they are commonly thought of,are no longer being built,and"manufactured housing"has taken their place.Manufactured housing is much more like traditional site-built housing than was the traditional mobile home.The manufactured housing Industry contends that there is no appreciable difference between the two.Being generally less expensive than site-built housing,manufactured housing can provide viable housing opportunities for low income families. Prior to SB 6593,Washington cities and counties seemingly had the authority to regulate the location of manufactured homes through zoning and even to ban them entirely.While local goverunenls were(and still are "preempted"by federal law(the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974)from enacting construction,safety,and energy standards that are stricter than those established by federal regulations adopted by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD),HUD had acknowledged that the federal legislation did not limit the authority of local governments to regulate the location of manufactured housing,as long as they do not do so based on compliance or noncompliance with stricter construction,safety,and energy standards.And,in Washington Mantrfactur•ed Housing Assay. i', Public Utility District No. 3, 124 Wn,24 381,385(1994), the state supreme court,in dicta,noted that it is"clear that zoning laws that ban manufactured housing or limit them to certain areas are not preempted if they are silent as to construction or safety standards." SB 6593,however,eliminated any previous ability of local govertunents in the state to restrict where manufactured housing- at least certain manufactured housing-could locate. See RCW 35,21.684;RCW 35A.21.312,and RCW 36.01.225 Nevertheless,cities and counties may under this legislation require that that these manufactured homes: (1) be new manufactured homes(but see below);(2)be set on a permanent foundation;(3)comply with any local design standards that may apply to all other homes in the neighborhood in which the rnatwfactored home is to be located;(4)are thermally equivalent to the state energy code; and/or(5) otherwise meet requirements for a"designated manufactured home" in RCW 35,63.160.(Because a "designated manufactured home"under that definition is one that includes at least two sections,cities and counties may still regulate "single-wide"manufactured homes differently than other types of homes.) 2008 Legislation Further Restricts Local Regulation This legislation was amended by the 2008 legislature to provide that cities and counties may not prohibit a mobile or manufactured home from locating in an existing mobile home park or manufactured housing community(existing before June 12,2008)based on the age or size of that mobile or manufactured home. See RCW 35.21.684;RCW 35A.21.312,and RCW 36.01.225. Local jurisdictions are still permitted to place age and dimension criteria on manufactured housing that is sited outside of mobile and manufactured housing communities,or on housing to be sited in new mobile home parks or manufactured housing communities(SSEI 5524). 2009 Legislation Permits Recreational Vehicles as Housing The 2009 legislature added a further limitation on the authority of cities and counties regarding manufactured/mobile home conummities.Under FHB 1227(Laws of 2009, ch.79), which became effective on July 26, 2009,cities and counties may not have an ordinance that prevents the entry or requires the removal of a recreational vehicle used as a primary residence in manufactured/mobile home communities. However,cities and counties may enact requirements that utility hookups in manufactured/mobile home communities meet state and federal building code standards for these communities and that a recreational vehicle contain both au Internal toilet and an internal shower(unless Ike manufactured/mobile home community provides toilets and showers).See RCW 35.21.684(3),RCW 35A.21.312(3),and RCW 36,01.225(3). Many local manufactured housing ordinances in this state have been on the books for a number of years and do not necessarily reflect the current state of the law Or of the industry.The Washington Manufacured Housing Association has developed"model"regulations for local governments to adopt for the purpose of complying with SB 6593. See Documents below.The model regulations do not,however,address the 2008 legislation,SSB 5524,or the 2009 legislation,EH B 1227. Revised Code of Washington(new)Definitions "Mobile home"means a factory-built dwelling built prior to June 15, 1976,to standards other than the United States department of housing and urban development code,and acceptable under applicable state codes in effect at the time of construction or introduction of the home Into the state.Mobile homes have not been built since the introduction°film United States department of housing and urban development manufactured home construction and safety act; "Used mobile home" means a mobile home which has been previously sold at retail and has been subjected to tax under chapter 82.08 RCW,or which has been previously used and has been subjected to tax under chapter 82,12 RCW,and which has substantially lost its identity as a mobile unit at the time of sale by virtue of its being fixed in location upon land owned or leased by the owner of the mobile home and placed on a foundation(posts or blocks) INitlt fixed pipe connections with sewer,water,and other utilities. "Mobile home lot"means a portion of a mobile home park or manufactured housing community designated as the location of one mobile home, manufactured home,or park model and its accessory buildings,and intended for the exclusive use as a primary residence by the occupants of that mobile home,manufactured home, or park model; "Mobile home pa a," "mnaufnetured housing community," or"In mot factored/mobile home community" means any real pioperty which is rented or held out for rent to others for the placement of two or more mobile homes,manufactured homes,or park models for the primary purpose of production of income,except where such real properly is rented or held out for rent for seasonal recreational purpose only and Is not intended for year-round occupancy; "Mobile home park cooperative"or"manufactured housing cooperative"means real property consisting of common areas and two or more lots herd out for placement of mobile homes,manufactured homes,or park models iii which both the individual lots and the common areas are owned by an association of shareholders which leases or otherwise extends the right to occupy individual lots to its own members; "Mobile home park subdivision" or"manufactured housing subdivision" means real properly, whether It is called a subdivision condominium,or planned unit development,consisting of common areas and two or more lots held for placement of mobile homes,manufactured homes,or park models in which there is private ownership of the individual lots and common,undivided ownership of the common areas by owners of the individual lots; "Mnnufactum'ed home" means a single-family dwelling built according to the United States department of housing and urban development manufactured home construction and safely standards act,which is a national preemptive building code.A manufactured home also:(a)Includes plumbing,healing,air conditioning,and electrical systems;(b)is built on a permanent chassis;and(c)can be transported in one or more sections with each section at least eight feet wide and forty feet long when transported,or when installed on the site is three hundred twenty square feet or greater; "New manufactured home"means any manufactured home required to be titled under Title 46 RCW, which has not been previously titled to a retail purchaser, and is not a"used mobile home"as defined in RCW 82.45.032(2), "Designated manufactured home" is a manufactured home constructed after June 15, 1976,In accordance with state and federal requirements for manufactured homes,which: (a)Is comprised of at least two fully enclosed parallel sections each of not less than twelve feet wide by thirty-six feet long; (lr)Was originally constructed with and now has a composition or wood shake or shingle, coated metal,or similar roof of nominal 3:12 pitch;and (c)Has exterior siding similar in appearance to siding materials commonly used on conventional site- built uniform building code single-family residences. Exhibit 5 - home Occupation standards Home Occupations • Permitted accessory uses In residential zones; O Property shall retain a residential appearance and character; G All storage shall be enclosed within the residence or accessory structure; o There shall be a limit of two employees not resitting on the premises engaged in the home occupalion; • One unlighted sign placed flush against the exterior wall of the principal structure not exceeding four square feet in area is permitted; 6 No window display nor shall sample commodities • The hours of operation of a home occupation are limited to 7:00 a.m.to 10:00 p m.; • Loading docks and mechanical loading devices are not permitted; • Uses which are detrimental to the existing residential appearance and character are not allowed as home occupations. The following are NOT allowed as home occupations: adult retail use establishment, adult bookstore or adult entertainment establishment; auto repair; welding or metal plating shops; large appliance/electronics or equipment repair or service; small engine repair; truck hauling and/or tow storage yard; vehicle sales; cabinet making; manufacturing and/or related storage; kennel or stables; wholesale or retail sales restaurants/drinking establishments Exlhibit 6 -AUD Stardards ADU 6 One per tot O Must be a complete, independent housekeeping unit; U Combined footprint of all accessory structures shall not exceed 10 percent of the lot area; o No home profession in the ADU o Owner must occupy either the principal dwelling unit or the ADU O Parking space required ▪ 50 percent of the habitable square footage of the principal dwelling unit, nor be less than 300 square feet; o Entrance located on the side or in the rear of the structure or in such a manner as to be unobtrusive in appearance when viewed from the front of the street, and only one entrance may be located on the facade of the principal dwelling unit in order to maintain the appearance of a single-family residence; 6 No more than two bedrooms 6 Designed to meet the appearance of a single-family residence CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 22, 2013 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Chance Order 8 - 2012 Street Preservation Projects — Phase 1 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: March 27, 2012 council approved the Pavement Management Plan Update for 2011; April 10, 2012 council approved $2.8 million dollars for street preservation projects in 2012; May 15, 2012 Admin Report on the 2012 Street Preservation Projects Update; June 12, 2012 Awarded 2012 St Preservation Project — Phase 1 to Spokane Rock Products. BACKGROUND: The project plans were prepared and advertised for bid on May 18th. Council awarded Phase 1 of the 2012 Street Preservation Project to Spokane Rock Products, Inc. for $630,799.53, approximately $400,000 below the Engineer's estimate. The project began construction on July 23 and was substantially completed on September 5. Staff has prepared the attached Change Order 8 to pay for major bid item quantity overruns. See the attached Memorandum on Change Order 8 — Explanation of Major Bid Item overages. The cost of the overages increase the project cost above 15% of the bid contract price and require Council Approval. Upon execution of the change order staff will begin project closeout resulting in retainage release. OPTIONS: 1) Approve Change Order 8 for the Phase 1 contract with Spokane Rock Products, Inc. or 2) take other appropriate action. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Change Order 8 of the 2012 Street Preservation Project — Phase 1 with Spokane Rock Products, Inc., in the amount of $29,834.21 and to authorize the City Manager to execute the change order to the construction contract. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Council approved a total of $2.8 million in for Street Preservation projects in 2012. The current estimate of funds spent for the Street Preservation costs is $2,230,000. There are funds available for the change order. STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Worley, Senior Capital Projects Engineer ATTACHMENTS: Change Order 8, 2012 Street Preservation Project — Phase 1; Memorandum, CO 8 Explanation of major bid item overages cr our a==- fG ':Y CHANGE ORDER TO CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT NO 12-017• OEpARTMENT OP PUBIJC WORK8 . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . ■PROJECT; 2012 8troe Psevtbn Projnat-P€asp 9 CONTRACT[ATE: 8/2912012 CONTRACTOR: ..-..Spokane Rook Products,Inc . CHANGE ORDER NO 8 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO; 0160 BID hiO,. 12-017 ... . pE$pRIPT1ON OF CHANGES This Summary of Quantilles Change Order pays for major bid Item overages. See the attached Std Item Overage Explanation, Rom No Doe()Hatton llnit Onsntlty Unit Prtc@ Ts31tl Soh 0-EA SCHEDULE 0 FLAQGERS ANO SPOTTERS HR 167,60 $ 42,00 2,00 $7,068 75 • Soh C-10A HIM CL.1!2 PG 642$,,17 FT,DEPTH Bch G-12A HMA SIGNAL PATCH S.Y. 114 $ E4,83 $6,260.82 Soh G•'14A JOINT ADHESIVE t.F 11,609 $ 0.60 58,754.60 Soh G-23A CEMENT CONCRETE TRAFFIC CURB AND GUTTER LP 78 $ 27.43 $2,189.64 Sch C-24A CEMENT CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN CURB LP 89 $ $5,20 53.932.80 Total Amount of this Change Order(Inol.Tax) $29,834121 SUESTANTIAL.OOMPLETIoN - Original Dale: 8!2412012 Nor to this Change Orden 91612012 inoiuding this Change Order: 91612012 Original Working Days.... 28 Walking Days Added b ;Ihls CO: 0 Wo kIng Da; incltrcii - ng this CO 30, • ter.... THESE CHANGES RESULT IN TH1 FOLLOWING ADJUSTMENTS OF TOTAL CONTRACT PRIDE, 830,7tIQ lS3 ORIGINAL TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT' ,�;, i i4 w-1. .:.i» s• r.a+�:-r'ri=i„,s�H 3.IINluy�i.•n4�!.e�.SYFII..w l.w.'�x,rM.R�t +` TOTAL PRIOR CONTRACT CHANGE-ORDER Af UL►NT 93,489.90 �..v«.�..-.-,•..k.,,..w..,,•a1..1.�,vx..o.:.:».;rF4:.,,,�lm.rr>ny»t+.w.Mw,».»�,�. TOTAL CONTRACT PRICE PRIOR TO'His CHANGE ORDER ��4 �� �� «Iw.kwyn.fr.k.:k;t ..� n NET T HlS CHANGE ORDER me34.21 TOTAL ONTRAQT AMOUNT`INCUDING THIS CHANGE ORDER 7 26 t OOITRAOT ORACCEPTANOEI DATE: ..1�- /y 241( L The contreotor hereby accepts title adjustment Under the terms of the Waal contract for all work perfomed. RECOMMENDED BY: _ ,,‘ • --- .' .. DATE: 12•�ofr'?-. .. DATE: . APPROVED BY: ., DATE:APPROVED BY: :- . :. •• • 'OlirMansaor ATTAdHMENT.S: CO 8 B€d item Overage Exalanattorf Distal/60i . ORIGINALS TO: contractor,City o1 Spokane Valley Ciaris'3 01nco,PW Protect Pile L •GOtsiEB'K;-. t'W Pruleet File , •. . j.rr,>ySo... .. .r _c ts� rz43rr ....... ..„. ,..,..... isoPublic Works Department ane Capital Improvement Program Valleyg 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 • Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 • Fax: 509.921.1008 0 cityhatl @spokanevalley.org Memorandum To: File From: Craig Aldworth, P.E. —Project Engineer Date: Jan 8, 2013 Re: 2012 St Preservation Project-- Phase 1 Change Order 8 -Explanation of Major Bid Item Overages Schedule C—Dishman—Mica Road Schedule C Bid Item 5, Schedule C Flaggers and Spotters -$7,968.75 The original estimate for flagging was too low for the Dishman-Mica Schedule. The project traffic control plans referenced WSDOT Standard Plans that conflicted on the amount of flagging required for some project locations. Other Standard plans included in the contract did not provide for flagging. When in doubt as to which Standard Plan applied to a given situation, the Contractor erred on the side of caution, and provided flagging. This approach resulted in no construction related accidents during the project. Additional flaggers and spotters were required along Dishman-Mica Rd while conducting ADA pedestrian ramp retrofit work to safely separate the construction equipment from vehicle traffic on the intersecting streets. Additional flaggers and spotters were also used during grinding and paving operations to guide traffic from adjacent homes and businesses through the work area. Schedule C Bid Item 10, HMA CL W PG 64-28, .17FT Depth -$4,588.00 As a cost-saving measure the original bid set of plans did not include grinding and repaving of the NB Dishman-Mica bike lane. When the bids came in significantly lower than the Engineer's Estimate ($400,000), staff re-reviewed the paving limits. It was determined that not including the bike lane in the grind and paving limits,would leave a long longitudinal joint on the edge of the NB lane. Staff felt it would be best not to have to maintain this longitudinal joint. Therefore, the bike lane area was added to the grind and paving quantities. This eliminated the future costs of maintaining the joint and will prolong the life of the pavement. Also the plans were quickly prepared using aerial photos which are not as accurate as preparing plans using a topographic survey. This resulted in a variation between bid quantities and what was actually installed in the field. Payment to the contractor is based on actual field measurements made by the project inspector. Schedule C Bid item 12, HMA Signal Patch -$6,250.62 The patch areas for the signal at the Dishman-Mica Rd and University Rd intersection were expanded from what was shown on the original plans. The patch was extended to the curb to allow optimal signal loop placement, widened so that the patch edge would not be in a wheel path, and adjusted along centerline to enhance constructability between traffic control phases. Schedule C Bid item 14,Joint Adhesive-$5,754.50 Joint Adhesive was originally planned to be applied only at transverse edges of the new inlay as a cost saving measure. Since the bid came in well under the Engineer's Estimate, the joint adhesive was also applied to the longitudinal edges of the inlay on Dishman-Mica Rd. This will reduce future crack sealing maintenance costs in the future. Schedule C Bid Item 23, Cement Concrete Traffic Curb and Gutter-$2,139,54 Additional curb and gutter (from what was originally estimated) was removed and replaced when it was found to be damaged or cracked along Dishman-Mica Rd. Also additional curb and gutter was removed to revise pedestrian ramp designs so they would conform to current ADA requirements. The design plans called for perpendicular style curb ramps at the four corners of the Dishman-Mica I Schafer intersection. The ramp designs on these corners were revised in the field to parallel style curb ramps that fit better within the existing site constraints. Schedule C Bid Item 24, Cement Concrete Pedestrian Curb -$3,132.80 Additional pedestrian curb was installed when pedestrian ramp designs were revised to conform to current ADA requirements along Dishman-Mica Rd. The design plans called for perpendicular style curb ramps at the four corners of the Dishman-Mica I Schafer intersection which do not include pedestrian curbs. The ramp design on these corners was revised in the field to parallel style curb ramps that do include pedestrian curb. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 22, 2013 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Spokane Valley, the City of Spokane, and Spokane County, Regarding Regional Solid Waste Management GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.21.120; RCW 35.21.152; RCW 35.21.156; RCW 70.95; RCW 39.34 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: On January 15, 2012, City Manager Mike Jackson discussed in City Manager comments that an MOU on regional solid waste management may be presented for Council approval at the January 22, 2013, meeting. BACKGROUND: The City of Spokane provides regional solid waste services via the Spokane Regional Solid Waste Management System related to the transfer and disposal of solid waste within the unincorporated areas of Spokane County, the City of Spokane, the City of Spokane Valley and all other incorporated cities in Spokane County. The County, City of Spokane, City of Spokane Valley and other regional cities executed interlocal agreements to participate in the System, all of which expire November 16, 2014. Over the past five years, there have been extensive ongoing discussions regarding whether to continue the System or explore other solid waste disposal and transfer alternatives. There is not sufficient cost information about alternatives for the City to make a decision on the extension of its interlocal agreement. The City desires to collaborate with Spokane County and the City of Spokane to fund a study to identify and estimate cost alternatives to the existing System to allow the City to make an informed decision on solid waste disposal and transfer services. A draft Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) has been prepared to establish the collaborative efforts of the City, Spokane County and the City of Spokane to fund a study to identify and estimate cost alternatives to the existing System. The MOU provides that the estimated budget for the proposed study is $75,000. The City of Spokane will pay 100 percent of the study up to $46,000, and Spokane County and the City will pay equal amounts of any remaining costs. Based upon the estimated cost of the study, the City and Spokane County would each pay $14,500. If for any reason the City of Spokane determines not to fund the study, the City and Spokane County will split the amount that should have been paid by the City of Spokane and will pay equal amounts for the total cost of the study. The study will be conducted by a consultant who will be selected pursuant to a request for proposals issued by Spokane County. The Board of County Commissioners for Spokane County is anticipated to approve the MOU on Tuesday, January 22, 2013. OPTIONS: Council may approve the MOU, deny the MOU, or request changes. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the "Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Spokane Valley, Washington, and the City of Spokane, Washington, and Spokane County, Washington, Regarding Regional Solid Waste Management." BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Estimated 2013 cost of$14,500. STAFF CONTACT: Mike Jackson, City Manager; Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney ATTACHMENTS: Draft Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Spokane Valley, Washington, and the City of Spokane, Washington, and Spokane County, Washington, Regarding Regional Solid Waste Management MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WASHINGTON, AND THE CITY OF SPOKANE,WASHINGTON, AND SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON, REGARDING REGIONAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU)is entered into on this day of , 2013, by and between the City of Spokane Valley, the City of Spokane, and Spokane County (hereinafter collectively referred to as the"Parties"). RECITALS WHEREAS, the City of Spokane, a first-class charter city duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the state of Washington, provides regional services via the Spokane Regional Solid Waste Management System ("System") related to the transfer and disposal of solid waste within the unincorporated areas of Spokane County, the City of Spokane, the City of Spokane Valley, and all other incorporated cities in Spokane County (all areas together, the "Region"); and WHEREAS, Spokane County, the City of Spokane Valley, and other Regional cities executed interlocal agreements with the City of Spokane to participate in the System, all of which expire or come due for renewal in November of 2014; and WHEREAS, over the past five years there have been ongoing discussions regarding whether to continue the System in its existing configuration, or to explore alternatives to the existing System configuration; and WHEREAS, there is not sufficient cost information relative to the alternatives to the existing System configuration for the Parties to make a decision on extension of the interlocal agreements; and WHEREAS, the Parties desire to collaborate on the funding of a study to identify and estimate costs for alternatives to the existing System configuration; and WHEREAS, the City of Spokane, the City of Spokane Valley, and the County are authorized by chapter 39.34 RCW to enter into agreements with each other for cooperative action, such as planning, construction, owning, financing, managing and operating solid waste facilities; and WHEREAS, the aforementioned recitals are found to be true and correct findings of fact; and WHEREAS, the City of Spokane, the City of Spokane Valley, and the County hereby find and determine that this MOU is mutually fair and advantageous to the City of Spokane, the -1- City of Spokane Valley, and the County. NOW, THEREFORE, between the Parties hereto, the City of Spokane, the City of Spokane Valley, and the County, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS As used in this MOU, the following words, unless the context otherwise dictates, have the following meanings: County means Spokane County, Washington, a class A county of the state of Washington. Budget means the contract amount for the consultant to conduct Phase I of Evaluation of County-Wide Transfer and Disposal System Alternatives. MOU means this Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Spokane, the City of Spokane Valley, and the County for the study of alternatives and costs to the existing System configuration. Region means all municipalities that are members of the Spokane Regional Solid Waste System and all areas served by the System. Solid Waste Regional Solution means County-wide collaboration between the Parties to determine solid waste management plans for the Region, which may consist of the use of existing or new solid waste facilities and services and which may be offered and entered into jointly or separately as determined to be in the best interest of each of the Parties. System means the Spokane Regional Solid Waste System. ARTICLE II COOPERATIVE PROJECT Section 2.1. Purpose of this MOU. The purpose of this MOU is to set forth an agreement between the City of Spokane, the City of Spokane Valley, and the County relating to the sharing of the financing for a study to identify the costs of all reasonable solid waste transfer and disposal alternatives within the Region as a means to find a Solid Waste Regional Solution. Section 2.2. Cooperative Nature of the Project. The City of Spokane, the City of Spokane Valley, and the County hereby recognize the regional nature of solid waste management, and a commitment to a Solid Waste Regional Solution. To achieve a beneficial Solid Waste Regional Solution, the Parties hereby declare their intent to collaboratively fund a study to identify and estimate costs for System alternatives. -2- Section 2.3. Project Scope. The project is a study to evaluate several alternatives for transport and disposal of solid waste, in accordance with the Request for Proposals for Evaluation of County-Wide Transfer and Disposal System Alternatives-Phase I, attached hereto as ATTACHMENT A. Section 2.4. Project Funding. The estimated maximum Budget for Phase I of the study is Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars ($75,000). The City of Spokane agrees to contribute one hundred percent of the cost of the study up to Forty-Six Thousand Dollars ($46,000). The County agrees to pay fifty percent of the balance of the cost of the study, which is estimated to be Fourteen-Thousand Five Hundred dollars ($14,500) based upon the Seventy Five Thousand Dollars ($75,000) Budget estimate. The City of Spokane Valley agrees to pay fifty percent of the balance of the cost of the study, which is estimated to be Fourteen-Thousand Five Hundred dollars ($14,500) based upon the Seventy Five Thousand Dollars ($75,000) Budget estimate. The County will send invoices to each of the Parties for their share of the work following the receipt of invoices from the consultant. Each party will reimburse the County within thirty (30) days of receipt of invoice. Section 2.5. Project Management. The County will issue the Request for Proposals for Evaluation of County-Wide Transfer and Disposal System Alternatives, and select the consultant in collaboration with the City of Spokane and City of Spokane Valley. The consultant shall provide the services described in the Request for Proposals to both the County and City of Spokane Valley in the manner described in the Request for Proposals. ARTICLE III MISCELLANEOUS Section 3.1. Amendment of this MOU. Amendment of this MOU may be made only by written agreement of the City of Spokane, the City of Spokane Valley, and the County. Section 3.2. Duration and Termination of this MOU. (a) This MOU shall be in effect until Phase I of the study is completed, or December 31, 2013, whichever occurs first. (b) Except as otherwise provided herein, this MOU may be terminated early only by mutual agreement of the City of Spokane, the City of Spokane Valley, and the -3- County. Section 3.3. Regionalization of Solid Waste Management. Nothing in this MOU shall preclude the City of Spokane, the City of Spokane Valley, and/or the County from participating in efforts to form a new regional solid waste management entity, revising the existing System, or from providing solid waste management facilities and services separately; provided no new entity, revised System, or separate services shall exist or be provided until after November 16, 2014. Section 3.4 Organization of Separate Entity and its Powers. No new or separate legal entity is created to administer the provisions of this MOU. Section 3.5 Property Upon Termination. No property will be created under this MOU. Section 3.6 No Abrogation Nothing in this MOU is intended to limit or abrogate the Parties' existing rights or obligations under existing law. Section 3.7. Waiver. No officer, employee, agent or otherwise of the City of Spokane, the City of Spokane Valley, or the County has the power, right, or authority to waive any of the conditions or provisions of this MOU. No waiver of any breach of this MOU shall be held to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach. All remedies afforded in this MOU or at law shall be taken and construed as cumulative, that is, in addition to every other remedy provided herein or by law. Failure of the City of Spokane, the City of Spokane Valley, or the County to enforce at any time any of the provisions of this MOU, shall in no way be construed to be a waiver of such provisions, nor in any way affect the validity of this MOU or any part hereof, or the right of the City of Spokane, the City of Spokane Valley, and/or the County to hereafter enforce each and every such provision. Section 3.8. Headings. The section headings in this MOU have been inserted solely for the purpose of convenience and ready reference. In no way do they purport to, and shall not be deemed to, limit or extend the scope or intent of the sections to which they appertain. Section 3.9. All Writings Contained Herein. This MOU contains all of the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. No other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this MOU shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. The parties have read and understand all of the provisions of this MOU, and now state that no representation, promise, or agreement not expressed in this MOU has been made to induce the parties to execute the same. -4- Section 3.10. Filing of this MOU. The County shall file this MOU with the County Clerk, County Auditor and Secretary of State,with a copy of such filings to the City of Spokane Clerk and City of Spokane Valley Clerk. Section 3.11. Severability. In the event any provision of this MOU shall be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not, in any way, be affected or impaired thereby. Section 3.12. Effective Date. This MOU shall become effective immediately after it is fully executed by the City of Spokane, the City of Spokane Valley, and the Board of County Commissioners of the County. IN WITNESS WHEREOF each of the parties has executed this MOU by their duly authorized officials. DATED as of this day of , 2013. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Shelly O'Quinn, Chair Al French, Vice-Chair Todd Mielke, Commissioner ATTEST: Daniela Erickson, Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners ( SEAL ) -5- DATED as of this day of , 2013. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Spokane County, Washington Michael Jackson, City Manager ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk DATED as of this day of , 2013. CITY OF SPOKANE Spokane County, Washington ATTEST: City Clerk -6- ATTACHMENT A- STATEMENT OF WORK(SOW) 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Spokane County is initiating this Request for Proposals (RFP) to solicit submittals from firms interested in providing an evaluation of the options available to the County and the City of Spokane Valley for transfer and disposal of municipal solid waste (MSW). Spokane County is initiating this RFP on behalf of itself and the City of Spokane Valley. Spokane County and the City of Spokane Valley have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding to jointly acquire and utilize the firm selected through this RFP. The firm selected shall provide the services described herein to both Spokane County and the City of Spokane Valley. The Spokane Regional Solid Waste System (System) was created in 1988 by Interlocal agreement between the City of Spokane and Spokane County. The City of Spokane Valley joined the System in 2003 when it incorporated. There are currently 14 member jurisdictions which represent all of incorporated and unincorporated Spokane County. The bonds that were issued to finance construction of the System facilities were refunded in 2011. Nearly all current interlocal agreements and contracts related to the System are set to expire November 16,2014. The current System is administered as a department of the City of Spokane. System Facilities consist of the Waste to Energy (WTE) Facility, a transfer station in Spokane Valley, and a transfer station in unincorporated northern Spokane County. All System Facilities are currently owned by the City of Spokane. As the end of the long-term commitment to the System approaches, there is a strong desire by Spokane County and the City of Spokane Valley to jointly investigate lower cost transfer and disposal options for their respective waste streams through alternative means, including public, private,or a combination of public and private provider(PPP) approaches. In Spokane County, new municipal solid waste transfer stations are considered Essential Public Facilities (EPF), and must go through the EFP siting process. Concurrent with this RFP, Spokane County will begin the EPF siting process for new transfer stations. Additional information about the management of solid waste in Spokane County is contained in the Spokane County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan. Also, a copy of the transfer station appraisals will be made available upon request. Additional information about the specific facilities of the Spokane Regional Solid Waste System is contained in the 2009 Performance Audit. 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES It is anticipated that this evaluation will be conducted in three phases: 2.1 Phase I—Provide initial evaluation of transfer/disposal alternatives and estimated costs. Spokane County and the City of Spokane Valley are interested in having the successful firm provide an analysis of tipping fee cost estimates for the transfer and disposal of solid waste as compared to the estimated tipping fees of the System. Alternatives for transfer and disposal of solid waste to be considered include: 1. Purchasing and utilizing one or both of the two existing City of Spokane transfer stations (North County and Valley).Recent appraisals of those facilities are available upon request. 2. Building new transfer station(s). 3. Combination of options 1 and 2. For each option, include analysis of differences in cost estimates for public purchase and operation, private purchase and operation,or mixed PPP purchase and operation. These facilities may be used by unincorporated Spokane County, the City of Spokane Valley, and potentially most of the smaller cities located within Spokane County. An assumption to be included in the tipping fee cost estimates is that the transfer stations will continue to provide the user citizens the ability to self-haul their solid waste,recyclables,clean green and moderate risk waste. The tipping fee cost estimates will also include additional costs to Spokane County for compliance with all of the required elements of RCW 70.95 and RCW 70.105. Unincorporated Spokane County and the City of Spokane Valley are served by WUTC certificated haulers. Purchase or acquisition of the existing transfer stations may require transfer of MSW to the WTE Facility for a period of 5 to 10 years. Provide in each option an analysis of delivery of MSW to the WTE Facility for 5 years and 10 years. Identify in the cost analysis the viability of use of existing rail facilities to provide long haul disposal (currently facilities exist at the Yardley Rail Yard, owned by Burlington Northern Santa Fe). The product of Phase I will be a technical memorandum of the comparison of cost estimates for each option to the existing system. The technical memorandum shall also summarize the analyses and assumptions that produced the cost estimates for tipping fees associated with transfer and disposal of solid waste. The memorandum shall provide established timelines for the various options, including any timelines for design, permitting and construction of any required new facilities. If facilities cannot be purchased or constructed by November 2014, provide necessary interim plans and associated costs, including either extension of the use of the existing System or interim use of long hauling. At the end of Phase I, Spokane County and the City of Spokane Valley will each determine which scenario to carry forward into Phase II. The scenario(s) selected may be joint with both entities or separate for each entity and may include use of the existing System. 2.2 Reporting Requirements and Timeline. 1.A draft report shall be submitted within (?)weeks of contract start date. 2.A final report shall be submitted within three weeks of receiving all comments on the draft report. In addition to any trip(s) to Spokane to collect data, the firm selected should budget four separate trips, each of one day's duration,to attend meetings with Spokane County and the City of Spokane Valley to present the results of the project to staff and elected officials. 2.3 Phase II—Develop detailed option analysis. A separate budget and timeline will be negotiated for Phase II and Phase III after Phase I is completed. In Phase II, the consultant will perform a detailed analysis of each entity's selected scenario to allow implementation of that option, including selection, acquisition, purchase or construction of transfer stations and an evaluation of the most advantageous means to forming a PPP, if that scenario is selected. 2.4 Phase III Implementation In Phase III, the consultant will assist in implementing the option selected by each entity, which may include assisting in preparing any necessary Requests for Proposals, assisting in the selection of a PPP firm, as necessary and assisting in the negotiation of a service agreement for a PPP. All such services may be provided jointly to Spokane County and the City of Spokane Valley or separately to each entity depending upon which option each entity selects. DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA For Planning Discussion Purposes Only as of January 17,2013; 8:30 a.m. Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative To: Council & Staff From: City Clerk, by direction of City Manager Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings January 29,2013, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Jan 21] ACTION ITEMS: 1.Motion Consideration: Interlocal Agreement regarding Decant Facility—Eric Guth (10 minutes) NON-ACTION ITEMS: 2.January Community Recognition,Presentation of Key and Certificate—Mayor Towey (5 minutes) 3. Interim Council Applicant Interviews (— 120 minutes) 4.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 140 minutes] SPECIAL MEETING: February 5,2013, Executive Session 5:00 p.m. 1. Discuss applicant interviews February 5,2013,Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Jan 28] ACTION ITEMS: 1.Appointment of Interim Council Applicant—Mayor Towey (15 minutes) 2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance, CTA 04-12 Code Text Amendment—Marty Palaniuk (20 minutes) NON-ACTION ITEMS: 3.Multi-Family Zoning—Mike Basinger (20 minutes) 4. Split-Zoning—Mike Basinger (20 minutes) 5. Emergency Management Plan—Cary Driskell (20 minutes) 6.Accomplishments Report for 2012—Mike Jackson and Dept Directors (30 minutes) 7.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 130 minutes] February 12,2013,No Meeting(City Legislative Action Conference ICLAC1 in Olympia) February 19,2013, Study Session Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Feb 11] 1.February Community Recognition,Presentation of Key and Certificate—Mayor Towey (5 minutes) 2. Proposed Amended 2013 TIP—Steve Worley (15 minutes) 3. Library/Park Update—Mike Stone (15 minutes) 4. CMAQ Grant Projects—Eric Guth (15 minutes) 5.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 6. Info Only: Department Reports; Planning Commission Min Jan 10 [*estimated meeting: 55 minutes] SPECIAL MEETING Feb 26, 2013 Winter Workshop (Note: no evening Council meeting) 8:30a.m.-5:00p.m. City Hall Council Chambers Tentative Topics: Ten-Year Anniversary Misc. Items: (Appleway Beautification) Work Plan 2013 Park/Library Update Manufactured Homes Zoning City Hall Council Goals Business Route Signage Legislative Agenda Solid Waste Council Meeting Processes City Funding Opportunities: Outside Agency;Lodging Tax Thurs, February,28,2013 (time TBA)—City Hall at the Mall Draft Advance Agenda 1/17/2013 4:28:54 PM Page 1 of 2 March 5,2013,Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Feb 25] 1.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) March 12,2013,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon March 4] 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Draft Amended 2013 TIP—Steve Worley (10 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) Sat,March 16 2013,10 a.m. to 4 p.m. —Spokane Valley 10th Anniversary March 19,2013, Study Session Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,March 11] 1.Advance Agenda March 26,2013,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,March 18] 1.March Community Recognition,Presentation of Key and Certificate—Mayor Towey (5 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3.Motion Consideration: Amended 2013 TIP—Steve Worley (15 minutes) 4. Information Only: Dept Reports;Planning Commission Minutes April 2,2013,Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,March 25] 1.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) April 9,2013,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,April 1] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) April 16,2013, Study Session Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,April 8] 1.Advance Agenda April 23,2013,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,April 15] 1.April Community Recognition,Presentation of Key and Certificate—Mayor Towey (5 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3. Information Only: Dept Reports; Planning Commission Minutes April 30,2013, Study Session Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,April 22] 1.Advance Agenda OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: ADA Transition Plan Solid Waste Analysis Appleway Landscape Improvements Speed Limits(overall system) Arts Council Stormwater Projects Bidding Contracts(SVMC 3.—bidding exceptions) Regional Transportation Issues(TBD,etc.) Budget,2013 amendment TIP(June,2013) Budget workshop for 2014(early June?) CDBG(spring 2013) *time for public or Council comments not included Coal Train EIS Future Acquisition Areas Gateway,Regional MOU Governance Manual Interlocal Agreement,Purchasing PEG Funds(Education) Public Safety Contract,Proposed Amendment Revenue Policy, Cost Recovery School Beacons Draft Advance Agenda 1/17/2013 4:28:54 PM Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 22, 2013 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing Z information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: EIS Meeting Related to Increased Coal Train Traffic GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: N/A BACKGROUND: On December 4, 2012 Public Works staff attended a scoping meeting at the Spokane County Fairgrounds for the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the proposed Gateway Pacific Terminal at Cherry Point. This project has brought up concerns about the increase of coal train traffic through Spokane Valley. Below are highlights of the information staff has at this time. 1. Cherry Point is north of Bellingham, WA in Whatcom County 2. The proposal is to build a new deep-water marine terminal that would handle import and export of up to 54 million dry metric tons per year of bulk commodities, mostly exporting coal (to China). 3. BNSF Railway Inc. is also proposing to add rail facilities adjacent to the terminal site and installing a second track along the six-mile Custer Spur. 4. The project is at the beginning of the Environmental permitting phase. An EIS is required to assess the potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of the proposed terminal. 5. The meeting held at the Fairgrounds was a scoping meeting for the EIS. The purpose was to take public comment on what issues should be addressed in the EIS. Other similar scoping meetings were held throughout the state. 6. There were two opposing groups represented at the meeting; those in favor of the terminal project because of the jobs it would create and those opposed to the terminal because of the perceived impacts associated with the rail transport of coal through the Spokane area (increase in train traffic, coal dust concerns, traffic impacts, delay in emergency response time, etc.). 7. The draft EIS is scheduled to be available for public review and comment in `2014 or later." There will be a public hearing to receive comments on the draft EIS 8. The final EIS is scheduled to be available in "2014 or 2015." 9. The proposed route for the coal trains is from the Powder River Basin in southeast Montana/northeast Wyoming west through the Spokane area, south through the Tri-Cities, west along the north side of the Columbia River, and then north through Seattle to Bellingham. 10. More information about the Gateway Pacific Terminal at Cherry Point can be found at http://www.ecy.wa.dovideodraphic/datewaypacific/ OPTIONS: Information only. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Information only. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Worley, P.E. - Senior Capital Projects Engineer ATTACHMENTS: S4okiIi Valle Operations & Administrative Services 2012 - 4th Quarter Report Administrative Projects: • Negotiated new Public Defender Enhanced Reporting • Completed review of 2011 Law Enforcement Settle and Adjust and 2013 Estimated Costs • Negotiated Animal Control Interlocal Agreement • Assisted with Economic Development Marketing Campaign • Ten Year Anniversary Planning, Budget & Committee Coordination Human Resources: Recruiting/Employment—Existing Unfilled Positions Recruitment ' Filled or Recruiting Accountant/Budget Analyst Recruiting Permit Facilitator Recruiting Limited Term Senior Engineer Recruiting Assistant Engineer Recruiting Development Services Coordinator Filled Recreation Assistant—Host Recruiting Senior Plans examiner Filled Special Projects: • Negotiation and ratification of successor labor agreement. • Research and development of alternate compensation and benefit plans. • Development and approval of personnel changes in the Community Development Department. • Completed the training, exam, and applied knowledge components necessary to earn the Certificate of Wellness Leadership. Public Information: Key Reporting Areas • Media relations • Media contacts: 19 (does not include those that were subsequently referred to another City resource or multiple contacts on same request) • Media releases: 22, Traffic Alerts: 18, SnowInfo Updates: 11, Calendar Requests: 2, for a total of 53 • Earned media stories: 19 (does not include all television/radio/web) • Total media stories: 60 (does not include ads,police reports, nor all television/radio/web) • Citizen Contacts: 58 +those at SVCC Biz Buzz breakfast • Media Release Email distribution: 330 • Traffic Alert Email distribution: 314 • Snowlnfo Email distribution: 349 • Hot Topic Community ENewsletter Subscribers: 542 • Hot Topic print distribution: Fall/Winter 2012 edition distributed to 19,000 in Valley News Herald, Spokesman Review and through numerous Spokane Valley locations • Website Updates: (Does not include P10-initiated, and daily/regularly scheduled page/document updates or those by departments with their own posting authority) • Areas of significant focus: • SnowInfo • Public Works construction season projects information outreach o Sullivan Road Bridge Replacement • Ten Year Anniversary plans • Marketing/Branding Web Site Web Site Summary Oct Nov Dec 4th Quarter 2012 Year to Date Unique User Sessions 9,369 8,767 8,475 94,976 Top Five Pages Viewed Employment 3,544 5,096 5,523 58,292 Police 1,423 1,238 1,563 16,864 Parks & Rec 755 807 456 16,808 Pools 180 90 100 13,546 Planning 959 742 860 11,557 Top Five "Referrer"Web Sites Spokane County—employment 914 876 894 11,863 Municipal Research (MRSC) 156 176 173 2,778 County Ideas 122 104 94 1,374 WM NW 158 118 33 1,361 Google 55 53 358 1,148 Central Reception: Business Registration • 435 New registrations • 1711 Annual renewal Call Volume 7,082 calls handled through the front-desk reception in 2012 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 CD Council H R Legal Misc Ops/Ad P&R PW Total min •Oct 268 54 14 16 207 55 17 96 727 •Nov 206 34 16 7 82 49 10 71 475 •Dec 161 28 13 15 113 30 7 32 399 Visitor Volume Oct,209 Nov, 140 Dec,161 2012 Total, 2046 Spokane Valley C.A.R.E.S —October - 113 November - 104 December - 81 (Year to Date—1,131) TOTALS 104 113 6 Misc 19 28 0 Street Sweeping 5 3 -I 7 Snow Related 0 0 2 Public Records Requests _ 4 4 Graffiti on City property 3 5 1 0 Stormwater/erosion 2 8 Dec 6 •Nov Traffic-various 6 21 •Oct 20 Sign 9 13 9 Road hazard 6 11 22 Animal Removal 32 19 4 Potholes 7 5 0 Animal Control 1 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 MEMO TO: Mike Jackson, City Manager FROM: Rick VanLeuven, Chief of Police DATE: January 14, 2013 RE: Monthly Report December 2012 December 2012: December 2011: CAD incidents: 4,502 CAD incidents: 4,302 Reports taken: 1,826 Reports taken: 1,789 Traffic stops: 1,003 Traffic stops: 1,287 Traffic reports: 345 Traffic reports: 339 CAD incidents indicate calls for service as well as self-initiated officer contacts. Hot spot maps are attached showing December residential burglaries, traffic collisions, vehicle prowlings, and stolen vehicles. Also attached are trend-line graphs for 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012: Citations, Spokane Valley Dispatched Calls, Self-Initiated Calls, Collisions, Persons Crimes, Property Crimes, and Sex Crimes. Also included is the November Crimes By Cities stats report. In 2011, we switched from UCR to NIBRS classification. As a result, certain crimes were broken down to their violation parts for NIBRS and each part is now counted. Consequently, comparing certain crimes before 2011 to crimes during or after 2011 is not possible using the graphs. The crimes that are impacted by the NIBRS classification changes and should not be compared to prior graphs include: Adult Rape, Assault, Forgery and Theft. ADMINISTRATIVE: Chief Van Leuven attended a meeting in early December along with other law enforcement agencies and personnel from the Department of Emergency Management to begin discussions/updates on Emergency Support Function #13 to include related plans, such as the evacuation plan. A working group was developed,who will meet in the coming months to update and revise the plan as needed. The semi-annual Behind the FACE Panel was held at Airway Heights in early December. FACE, which stands for FireArms Crime Enforcement, is a program facilitated at Airway Heights where a panel, comprised of representatives from various agencies to include law enforcement, speaks to inmates, who are scheduled for release. The inmates are identified as Armed Career Criminals and are reminded not only that they cannot possess firearms or ammunition after their release, but the Page 1 ramifications if they do not change their past criminal ways and abide with conditions placed on them once they are released from prison. Chief Van Leuven attended a meeting on the planning of an Active Shooter Exercise, scheduled for June 2013 at the Spokane Valley Mall. Crime Prevention Deputy Greg Snyder along with Spokane Valley Mall Security Head is working with law enforcement and Valley Fire to schedule a mock incident to provide agencies with the appropriate training, should an actual incident occur here. The Spokane County Sheriffs Office & Spokane • - • --„i, --- •.7 ,ir r Valley Police Department participated in the , r - =,.. •,Holidays and Heroes program in mid-December. it e. I. . Chief VanLeuven and Mayor Tom Towey, along ii 4 7 .E . with the Mayor's granddaughter, Allison, C - accompanied Zaeua Pederson for their shopping trip _ to purchase gifts for his family. The program was { able to help 31 families this year in Spokane w , County plus they had a fun time doing it. , — - = iink. Each family received gifts and a large food basket I 11171i” with all the makings for a wonderful Christmas 1_T= li -! ,!��;�� dinner. The families were selected through the -;1N' 's1 school districts and the deputies volunteered their time. After shopping at the Wal-Mart on Broadway in the _ _ —_ Spokane Valley, Deputies met with our North Idaho : ~ - 611,----— _ 4- law enforcement and emergency service personnel r---r--- ,r „ out at the Greyhound Park to wrap presents, visit a- "' - with Santa, check out Air 1 and enjoy some lunch. This program would not be successful if it weren't 4 for our generous sponsors and volunteers. Thank , s -, , t you to all who participated!! . COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING: December typically reflects lower hours due to the holidays and sometimes poor weather conditions. S.C.O.P.E. is having a Basic Training for new Volunteers on January 19, 2013. ➢ S.C.O.P.E. Incident Response Team meeting, ➢ CERT (Community Emergency Response Team)meeting; and, ➢ Operation Family ID Page 2 December 2012 Volunteers Hours per station: Location #Volunteers Admin Hours L.E. Hours Total Hours Central Valley 12 555.5 115.00 670.5 Edgecliff 23 444 5 449 Trentwood 5 142.5 89 231.5 University 19 421 213 634 TOTALS 59 1563 422 1,985 Volunteer Value ($21.62 per hour) $42,915.70 for December 2012 Total hours for Spokane Valley SCOPE volunteers totaled 33,009,for a total value of$713,654.58. S.C.O.P.E. Incident Response Team (SIRT)volunteers contributed 38 on-scene hours (including travel time) in December, responding to crime scenes, motor vehicle accidents and providing traffic control. Of those hours, 8 hours were for incidents in Spokane Valley. Total December volunteer hours contributed by SIRT, including training, stand-by, response and special events is 530; year-to-date total is 6,048 hours. SIRT response activity this year was slightly lower than 2011 (-5%) due in large part to a particularly mild weather start of the year. Looking back over the last four years, the type of responses is very similar from year to year, with motor vehicle accidents at the top of the list followed by traffic control responses not involving a vehicle (37%). The third response category is structural fires, accounting for 18%, and combined with vehicle accidents they accounted for over 55% of our response activity. Staffing levels are slightly higher by five more than this time last year, bringing our total level of certified members to 24. Finally, budget expenditures were within those projected. S.C.O.P.E. DISABLED PARKING ACTIVITY REPORT City of Spokane Valley # of #of Hrs #of Disabled #of #of Non- Vol. Infractions Warnings Disabled Issued Issued Infractions Issued January 7 120 13 0 0 February 5 150 19 0 0 March 11 194 21 0 0 April 9 139 16 0 0 May 7 127 13 19 0 June 8 110 5 0 0 July 10 134 26 0 0 August 3 68 5 0 0 September 7 67 16 0 0 October 7 87 9 0 0 November 7 112 30 0 0 December 8 85 16 0 0 Total 89 1393 189 19 0 Page 3 Spokane County # of #of Hrs #of Disabled #of #of Non- Vol. Infractions Warnings Disabled Issued Issued Infractions Issued January 5 24 6 0 0 February 5 74 0 0 0 March 5 29 1 0 0 April 8 80 0 0 0 May 6 67 2 2 0 June 7 21 1 0 0 July 8 45 1 0 0 August 0 0 0 0 0 September 7 30 1 0 0 October 4 12 0 0 0 November 4 24 0 0 0 December 3 5 0 0 0 Total 62 408 12 2 0 There were 26 reports of juveniles who ran away from their residence in Spokane Valley during the month of December 2012, 5 of which remain unsettled. There were a few juveniles who ran numerous times during the month, causing the high number of juvenile runaway reports. Nine of the runaways were from group homes. Abandoned vehicles tagged by S.C.O.P.E. volunteers for impoundment in Spokane Valley in November totaled 17 and in December 9 with 6 vehicles in November and 4 in December, respectively, eventually cited and towed. Sixteen hulks were processed in November and 7 hulks processed in December. During the month of December, a total of 36 vehicles were processed; the total for 2012 to date is 753. OPERATIONS: Vehicle Prowling/Garage Burglary Update — From mid-November through mid-December, Spokane Valley Property Crimes Detectives and Spokane Valley Patrol Deputies began an emphasis to combat the rise in vehicle prowlings and garage burglaries in the eastern part of the City of Spokane Valley. Monthly statistics had shown an increase in vehicle prowlings and garage burglaries in these areas from August 2012 through October 2012. As an example, the total garage burglaries in that area jumped from an average of 12.7 over the previous three months to 30 in the month of October 2012. There was an increase in vehicle prowlings from an average of 17.3 per month to a total of 65 vehicle prowlings in the month of August alone. The average from August to October 2012 was 44.3 prowlings. Sheriff Knezovich authorized the formation of a task force composed of four patrolmen and two detectives from the Spokane Valley Property Crimes Unit. There were originally over 30 people identified as being involved in these crimes or associated with those involved in the crimes. In the first four weeks, over 20 of those people had been arrested on over 22 felony charges, 22 misdemeanor charges, 10 felony warrants, and 17 misdemeanor warrants. Page 4 As investigation into several of these cases continue, dozens of felony charges will be added to those already charged, and several more individuals will be charged with new felony crimes. The charges include Vehicle Prowling, Possession of Burglary Tools, Possession of Vehicle Theft Tools, Possession of Controlled Substances, Identity Theft, Forgery, and Possession of Stolen Property. Charges of Theft and 2nd Degree Burglary are also forthcoming on several individuals. In one search warrant alone, over 57 items of stolen property were recovered from one target address, solving more than 10 garage burglaries. Detectives posted pictures of stolen property recovered from the residence on the Spokane Valley Police Department's Facebook page in hopes of identifying more victims. In District 6, we reduced the number of vehicle prowlings 44% compared to the previous four weeks. Vehicle prowlings in the entire Spokane Valley were reduced by 24% compared to the same period in 2011. The community is urged to report suspicious people, vehicles, and activities as these tips have been vital in combating these and other types of criminal activity in Spokane County. Spokane Valley Resident Robbed by Two Masked Suspects - Spokane Valley Sheriffs deputies responded to the 13800 block of East Heroy in the Spokane Valley just before 11 a.m. in early December for a report of a possible robbery. A 59-year-old male victim told deputies as he entered his unattached garage, he was confronted by two masked suspects. One of the suspects was armed with a black pistol and the victim was tied up during the incident. After the suspects left, the uninjured victim yelled for help and was assisted by a neighbor. The suspects stole some of the victim's coins and his black 1997 Ford F350 pickup with a silver stripe. One suspect was described as approximately 6'00" tall, wearing a black or dark colored jacket with white on it and dark colored pants or jeans. The second suspect was described as approximately 5'09" tall, wearing a red plaid type jacket and dark pants or jeans. Both of the suspects were believed to have worn dark colored gloves. The victim's truck was recovered later that evening. Valley Business Owner Arrested For Assault With Sexual Motivation - Spokane County Sexual Assault Detectives have been investigating multiple allegations of sexually motivated assaults by a Spokane Valley business owner. In early December, the 76-year-old male who owns a car dealership near the 18100 block of East Appleway Avenue, was cited and released on two counts of Assault 4th Degree with Sexual Motivation. The arrest was the result of two separate incidents that took place in December of 2011 and May of 2012. Both adult female victims claimed the male suspect engaged in inappropriate and unwanted touching when they responded to job postings at the business. Detectives believe there are other victims who have experienced the same type of criminal activity by the male suspect and the investigation is on-going. Anyone with information is asked to contact Deputy D. Simmons at 509-477-4719. Wanted Felon Apprehended—On an evening in early December, 9-1-1 received a call from a citizen stating that they were expecting a 32-year-old male wanted suspect at their residence sometime that evening. The male suspect had an active felony Department of Corrections Escape warrant and information was provided by the citizen, who was a family member, that he was possibly armed with a stolen firearm. The suspect's family member told Sheriffs Deputies they would let them know where he was when they called because they were worried about his safety. At about 11:30 p.m., a family member contacted Deputy C. Eaton and told him the male suspect had called and said he was walking in the area of Mirabeau Park by the river in Spokane Valley. About an hour later, Sheriffs Corporal J. Elliott was near the 13200 block of East Mirabeau Park Drive when he saw a male matching the Page 5 suspect's description walking westbound on Mirabeau. Corporal Elliott, a Spokane Police Department K9 unit, Air-1 and several additional deputies responded to the scene. The male suspect was ordered multiple times to lie on the ground, but refused to obey any commands given by deputies. In addition, he was reaching for his waistband and a duffel bag he had in his possession. Having information the male suspect may be armed with a stolen firearm, the SPD K9 unit was deployed allowing units on scene to safely take him into custody. A stolen .40 caliber handgun was located inside the male suspect's duffel bag along with a baggie of methamphetamine. The male suspect was booked into the Spokane County Jail on the charges of Possession of a Stolen Firearm, Unlawful Possession of a Firearm 2nd Degree, Possession of a Controlled Substance, Possession of Stolen Property 2nd Degree, Resisting Arrest and Obstructing a Law Enforcement Officer. Vehicle Burns In Driveway - Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputy C. Hilton notified dispatch of a vehicle driving recklessly near Park and Trent in Spokane Valley in mid-December. Sheriffs Deputy C. Sciortino was in the area of Trent and Havana when he observed the vehicle, a 2001 Pontiac Bonneville, traveling westbound on Trent prior to turning southbound on Havana. When Deputy Sciortino attempted to stop the vehicle, the driver continued to drive recklessly disregarding the southbound stop light at Havana and Mission. The vehicle continued south on Havana until it turned east on 8th Avenue. Deputy Sciortino lost sight of the vehicle near the area of 8th and Eastern. A short time later, a resident near the area of 200 N. Bessie called 9-1-1 and said there was a vehicle on fire in his driveway. Deputy Sciortino responded to the scene and determined it was the same vehicle that was driving recklessly. The vehicle was unoccupied at the time of the fire. The Spokane Valley Fire Department responded to the scene and extinguished the flames, which had fully engulfed the vehicle. An arson investigator with the Spokane Valley Fire Department determined the fire started somewhere in the engine compartment and was not arson. It is unknown at this time who was driving the vehicle or if the vehicle was stolen. Anyone with information about this case is asked to call Crime Check at 509-456-2233. "NIGHT OF 1,000 STARS" DUI Patrol - For the past 22 years, law enforcement agencies throughout Washington have conducted "Night of 1,000 Stars" impaired driving traffic safety emphasis patrols. Each "star" represents the badge worn by an on-duty law enforcement officer. This year's patrol, which occurred on December 14, was dedicated to all Washington law enforcement officers who continue to protect and serve our communities. This statewide enforcement's goal was to remove impaired drivers from our roads. Impaired driving caused by alcohol — or some other drug —is the primary reason why people die in motor vehicle crashes. Officers were also on the lookout for people who speed, drive aggressively, are not wearing a seatbelt, or violate other traffic laws. Wintertime driving can be hazardous. When mixed with alcohol or drugs it becomes deadly. There were 30 traffic fatalities in Spokane County in 2011; 16 of the 30 traffic deaths were from impaired drivers. The "Night of 1,000 Stars" is a cooperative effort involving the Spokane County Target Zero Task Force (one of the twenty-four DUI/Traffic Safety Task Forces in the state), the Washington Traffic Safety Commission and law enforcement agencies through Washington State. Burglar Meets Marine — In late December, at 10:45 a.m., Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputies were dispatched to a residence near the 12400 block of East Desmet Road for a burglary in progress. The caller advised 9-1-1 when she, her husband, daughter-in-law, and son came home they saw their animals were outside and that the front screen door was open. The homeowner told 9-1-1 that her son, an active United States Marine home on leave from Afghanistan, went inside the residence. The Marine's mother told 9-1-1 she heard yelling in the house as deputies arrived on scene. When deputies Page 6 entered the residence, they found a 43-year-old male suspect detained on the ground by the 22-year- old U.S. Marine Infantryman and his father. Once in custody, the U.S. Marine told deputies he located the male suspect in his parents'master bathroom, where the male suspect was trying to quietly shut the door. The Infantryman pushed the door open, escorted the male suspect to the ground with his father and waited only a minute or two for deputies to arrive. The male suspect had scattered jewelry around the bedroom, but he was not successful in his burglary attempt. The male suspect was booked into the Spokane County Jail on the charge of Residential Burglary after a short stay at a local medical facility. He has over 27 years of criminal history in Spokane County. School Shooting - The Spokane County Sheriffs Office would like to express our condolences to the victims, families and citizens of Newtown Connecticut. Our agency, as well as school district officials in Spokane County, have received numerous calls with questions about the safety of their children in our schools. The Spokane County Sheriffs Office has a total of seven School Resource Deputies assigned to the following school districts: • Liberty School District • Freeman School District • Central Valley School District • East Valley School District • West Valley School District • Mead School district The Spokane County Sheriffs Office was involved in the development of a Rapid Responder Program that began in 2004. This is a program that outlines everything in public schools dealing with evacuation of students, schematic of the schools, security, electrical plans, etc. This program assists deputies with assuring the quickest response into the facility in an emergency situation. Along with the Rapid Response Program, The Sheriffs Office conducts yearly training at schools throughout Spokane County dealing with the type of tragedy that took place in Connecticut. These training opportunities are extremely beneficial as it allows both the school districts and Sheriffs Office personnel to work as one. This leads to a more organized response and deployment of resources, since the school districts and Sheriffs Office know exactly what to expect from each other as a result of these training exercises. The Spokane County Sheriffs Office will continue to conduct these types of training exercises to ensure the safety of our children in every school district in Spokane County. **************** Page 7 2012 DECEMBER CRIME REPORT To date: Yearly totals: Dec-12 Dec-11 2012 2011 2011 2,010 2009 2008 2007 2006 BURGLARY 89 83 1062 1027 1027 936 725 753 584 714 FORGERY 107 92 826 593 593 341 297 354 365 334 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 161 151 1770 1566 1566 1183 1245 893 1,265 1,122 NON-CRIMINAL 3 9 108 160 160 917 892 944 839 811 PROPERTY OTHER 114 82 1236 1126 1126 837 933 828 890 982 RECOVERED VEHICLES 45 55 446 416 416 365 187 319 343 403 STOLEN VEHICLES 56 57 586 566 566 496 298 496 478 711 THEFT 215 206 2636 2512 2512 2365 2162 1,846 1,881 1,888 UIOBC 0 0 4 0 0 3 4 4 8 11 VEHICLE OTHER 20 23 287 195 195 3 5 7 3 3 VEHICLE PROWLING 93 125 1165 1491 1491 1395 920 1069 682 937 TOTAL PROPERTY CRIMES 903 883 10,328 9,615 9,615 8,852 7,668 7,513 7,338 7,916 ASSAULT 71 83 936 963 963 895 927 869 853 846 DOA/SUICIDE 20 22 256 213 213 188 210 269 221 167 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 56 59 600 714 714 1297 1226 1063 874 736 HOMICIDE 0 0 2 3 3 1 3 3 1 5 KIDNAP 2 2 17 15 15 16 21 16 23 22 MENTAL 20 8 270 253 253 289 310 360 350 425 MP 14 9 154 125 125 128 115 95 83 88 PERSONS OTHER 241 219 3112 2484 2484 1692 1621 1,354 1,337 1,159 ROBBERY 7 3 79 98 98 68 75 71 60 58 TELEPHONE HARASSMENT 19 14 212 162 162 153 159 95 73 83 TOTAL MAJOR CRIMES 450 419 5638 4997 4997 4727 4,667 4,195 3,875 3,589 ADULT RAPE 10 4 89 67 67 44 35 44 43 29 CHILD ABUSE 1 2 27 89 89 115 159 148 104 78 CUSTODIAL INTERFERENCE 18 15 190 184 184 206 157 86 92 105 SEX REGISTRATION 0 0 8 2 2 1 2 3 4 3 INDECENT LIBERTIES 3 1 27 17 17 8 10 11 18 15 CHILD MOLESTATION 0 0 0 19 19 47 35 66 46 69 CHILD RAPE 1 0 13 23 23 28 35 39 31 62 RUNAWAY 27 36 530 510 510 490 440 369 295 309 SEX OTHER 2 8 38 56 56 215 211 179 194 203 STALKING 0 2 24 19 19 18 15 21 17 17 SUSPICIOUS PERSON 27 40 424 341 341 215 175 142 152 177 TOTAL SEX CRIMES 89 108 1370 1294 1294 1387 1271 1,108 996 1,067 DRUG 39 40 430 519 519 541 670 838 807 665 ITF OTHER 0 0 0 2 2 2 1 0 1 0 TOTAL ITF 39 40 430 521 521 542 671 838 808 665 TOTAL TRAFFIC REPORTS 345 339 3957 3569 3569 3081 3,183 3,811 3,800 3,345 TOTAL REPORTS RECEIVED 1,826 1,789 21,723 19,996 19,996 18,589 17,460 17,465 16,817 16,582 Charge Count from Tickets: Spokane Valley 2500- — • 2000 IA •__■, • X 1500 ■ 2020109 1 •• • ♦ �� • --X-2010 • • • • • M X2012 1000 • • 500 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Spokane Valley Dispatched Calls 4000 3500 ' ' • 3000 4 • 2500 • -dos • • • � ■ 2009 -W-2010 2000 - -0-2011 X2012 1500 1000 500 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC SPOKANE VALLEY TRAFFIC COLLISIONS 300 - - A 250 - A 200 ` ` �w� • •N ■ A ' \vl • • 2009 150 • A 2010 A : X2011 A • • -1-2012 100 50 0 1 I I I I I I I I I I JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Spokane Valley Person Crimes 400 350 • /"............... • 300 - • A • !` • ! •� • • 250 • • ` • 2009 200 1 X . I aK 2010 • • -0-2011 -2012 T 150 100 50 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Spokane Valley Property Crimes 1000 - 900 • 800 AN; 700 • • 600 • • • 2009 500 • v� 2010 0/ . S' • • X2011 -o-2012 400 300 200 100 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Spokane Valley Self Initiated Incidents 3500 • 3000 • • I 2500 • • • • AL. • 2000 •• �� • • 2009 • / (N .4.4'....„,,....... -0-2010 X2011 1500 / X X2012 1000 500 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Spokane Valley Sex Crimes 60 50 • 40 • , • , Iwqry • ■ 2009 30 • • • I-• -) 2010 • X2011 X • • --2012 • 20 • • 10 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC I..21 cements 5uc1. .1" , fl I 1 Q e ae: °■\Y...'.,.. I ! 1- R� `� R.Hi Anson Granite•Mandalay _crew o a pA.�_ ‘% 1 .!mtEi e •t ° ♦Shane,�, ,, er VIE,/ 8 111111"��Il^i- ��. --__ .. 1 eP gal a i� I� 7L'17 ,I' '' Longtel. I.MENEV E � `!CI] - o ane `.. ' . � Lac Indu tri lkIkA i �.�,,�� :Q �311�11• arn 11111 ^^� MIME -5 , :. ipi I 111'■= ®'' __ —� w �. tio 2ee&&1111111■:• • ■�° i i^'= — -rid< Ir-- Lr irk -' '4_-'+, i— .©m�iq���= IE' I1II ._ Spokan: galley 1F""� "z� �111 ',P,, Old ��� �■■3='I�'�•L`NI ■a• Y _�© a_' .�tif:t■= d . ©• M s 1 ® 1 9 '1.• 1 �r�r1■ _ y� rrJE�7� _ o s y .�� ' M.1.1—''' u11ii ]IL� ,, 11■"© ■'■ � _ �1�111 . .� betty Lake E M■_a®rte riali to N � FIIP 2 . I� 71111∎• - . ■mil i 1:1■ ■�i � IBILIM.Iilarwinlaripfng o r I � �•: Ei■c�- I'�,�m. — ailiti■1111`' lE�:fr ilnum I!_' -a te■�� � � mills.�3 4th ' r 1. y ~� il�� !MELEE 4.1 EMITIOTIEWEIIIA !-Hugrii irt.,_, ,, , , ,.,.. P EWEN �: �. 1,.=.1 18th % ' � 1.77— 17. •�I\1 � 11—< r i li r <IS;� �■e■uy •.•� .--■zu.<�.�a \ ..y�,R 11R+�t'�- ��ii � G �� Is ■uuu071i i a e—rg . i4\\ F __� �'� new 0 11:M-a� a uw_a-■ 4 M `\ •�� y °wn ":'= 25th ° izialktii-eu P"+ 1 s j ::= = _u.Y■ . � 1 Traffic ` „!will I� ' ��� Collisions 1g. --� m a n �, C 4 It R' [ � ��''/ 1 € 1 5 3.- mar at I,� �_ AM& 2 Low � rnb&4 lOn M° N P a a -° •�� r ©�w,,anm7 M° � — High IIIINLO I_ eL _ "tip 0 0.5 I Miles 2012 December Traffic Collision Hotspots Map Produced: I I 08Jan 2013 Dement Su nfb ♦�� � ��.1.: .,.. a �i�ti �� rea��" ,.:� —I j �n ni o 5 a _-R•-'n- Mandalay aleE� frw'� Valle k�b' r l ■ gliii:G:I511- is.- � !3 1 j o f"II 1� II ���1!• / �po an " i 7ir.. i-cr I:din=r■.7 kA I ',Or,. in•� 1111111■. inVA llM... �>�. NEM =° $ >,w Eu id I y_ d "°��° {11 !111�11111'EIIII a I.I.� • .--__r■•auuu■w IIL�71.•1(�•' � !111111111 -�u- ralp '"•`"d� pe, I;.� I�■31. y, Spokan■ alley ,."4,,, 4 ; r _---, -4 ■FI MI X11 r, Illi �► - �� ��h a ON . — �;t. 111E .Is-MC �% Nora -'`- Fbh Pit a �� I1�t■cl.I�i�L'� - V I1■9R�"�1i0i�� I7I, - Q �. Missi. 1 pJ 7 ' "IMF i a1■3u■ 1: a � --� u9i1� � -� ' II:di1 — d�• ■ Broadway ■111 111 it 1— ■rim . From. �� �.: �! ■ ....1 .1-e ;r='"'�■_l1fa -„im-:I) c I M .� . d � lll111111 I,Q o"rte vv o r.>_� - r ■ 1 ■.. I I E k-olli ii li° �J rw1 s 3 -- ■11 a =— r vi e11eY y i '®J • .1.1 �— m sr� Lake r 0 1 ■�F°ll`.11■�i bd —Z'- �'■�� e.,■■■i �i�rlrl��d �y `1 ea II _ �■�• b■ ■E.'.. ":;;■■li _■L= II 11] �r `It ligh ■ !•■■t m �i y 11121 1 ■ ` 111 a Ir• .�■ ■ ��6,, I11 \�0.'-1..ceru.La�P 1\��RICi �mi ', GFs, Ist r ■ s�iVt... 1�� 1Rr rnd '� •11.011,0j,fir r3til�. ,�- ��I Eip! — n 1 11 0-, � i till , �. � y��i ir-- "_ �� —_I� 9 _ —n. T ry i Stolen � iti��■-■a��l Ran. ' �3 �- - - voc rag b e or i , P,4• Vehicles r* m ■� X111 �'e 4m -- D C 3 1y� A ILL A9 i•t�... F�' �� ." Em.. ' c ,,, . Low . ,„Corkery '� Si �A...1,4 T Pn ���. gds 17 1 -' . p b 6 Medium ta�nti4 al 71 ,r r',' G,ke, 1 e Mon,,....0 • — High 0 0.5 IMiles 2012 November & December Stolen Vehicle Hotspots M081anduced: e. Dement Su nfb'd +`` T, ll� ���—� IL' e ��1 ° ,� RS,-a rest.° ,iwo ya�1■ f � wpm- Mandalay .E 3wyy'j�r - - RAF �F fruit Hill , Gran to lI Valle ,'` •;;erW ash I "ns �'�.r.. .i!`] 'C Ill a rir.,po ane 4■ Y , �� i��r .C1 -n �� Indu tri..7 kA ar __ 11 �r,� o©G. a �. ood �'I� P,e�° ■■■ pw 1= 4 timt. 'AMR !i1T.a ki `—Mra■f_ ..'- •. Kati- 1{� !W I'`UM` p3 ��d� �.�yy< /'�M�'■�: I .� Mon.mery ..mina a • S' Spokan. alley �4d " ,1L� 1a g ■Ein I'''ll 1,1� ■ k Norafel �, h Pit V. �S I■j�� _ _,..:-.5.,-,v--- V7. VC .' a ' Mad gr t _ — �, �_ ! --=`Ti��� �:_ ■t. _ 190` , M� =~F . �� � ? _,r EIF=ii 1-3 Clement Su nfb'd ♦�� _.. a x•71 ,A rases �:a'tiiif" j San f 444 2 • ' �i-,-_— 7 ,sH g S two _aR•�'n- nanday a. 4) a AI 41 a.� �F Ft Hill .r Gran re ILE G` wabasn o �.`"-...�. ory war an El J po ane ` .' IIN lid Indu tri.17 kA !� F' I 11131%Gra _ ood FlEkl 6 v Ill � y_. 111l�IIIIIEl�Ef�- ��- �° !__._-�'•'j--. �a�6 ^� I I G!...00 ,�1:=_ s ` _ '� ' -a _-._rid..,_ ^, nesa rd;t_ ' : �1 = P d'' .41171"110.°."7. 111-- i� ,. it , 61 Spokan■ alley I � .is-n,. eG -- �il -pus-•• ! e Manseeid 4,11,._ v��1�. ■q ,r �1� a11Jp[rtO yer..mil ui�i ��indiana u�_ . �i.Y�:yv. �.�. l^ - —• �`TI�IL�Itl'IYz.ii „' r - �% `�_ F�'ra Pit ad �! 1 :MME' r�__��� r VI 71i Ca�d. ,� -- •—f: iiiii."-miLJ. ©la■ rtEM — r6fi� ∎SMIEr �., w r � Imam =jrr;•o+ MOU ��IIII iii—m■�®_ _ f_ © E .. ,� , c ■im m.. f,rNmc a amg r g� millE Inlw M� . R 7r�, ���—f�`3 i�,, -- I�AM — 1 i ! alai■1i':. I ode a �re� ��fi�'-���...r`.33 � 3i�0 �JI cSi c to d 3rd a,_ �� li—� a.�i�rj�% ' --'-- tU �IIG 1rm.n1�.,.sd, 7a, ui elley 61 � v_ ®�An9— G R .M m (.Lake r 6a, _ -- --- =� -_..� nth - w s .e rid —w �—I 3 ura p --. 1- d ■L Q 12th 1'I] ,r /It M. • rrr.i — V_� V 1�r�r� ; la 3 h L r ` ■mil ■n.-rw.e� 11L . ...•... •_ 1 F --1 6th n��+l! ¶ irif INNI �. � ..1 a w w le --aul'�IG. k .6 h Fral 25th a 1,� t--- w 1 a, ` 2 1 .: l Ali \EU''U—s�'il� .'R1PIIL z n_2__ ,. �. `b3 �1 yam` ��+[ h t °'r te Y .�� 4'4 g' Prowling Oc l �• 11t 1� 45th :-.. . 11a,M ie ■� 1 4-" 'Pe 46th N- – .� 3 L rrrrrrr-es Corkery —� . ..:. Low '.a ��.r�.4,° II Ms 54 7 a,;: r - ly1 -' Medium Mink 57th �■l roe' �¢< dke � Moh ook� 'Euielaila ,, sl High 0 0 5 iMiles 2012 December Vehicle Prowling Hotspots Map 08 2012 DECEMBER CRIMES BY CITIES AH CH DP FC FF LAH LL ML MW RF SCO SPA SPK SV WAV Total BURGLARY 4 0 2 0 0 0 6 1 2 0 101 0 0 89 0 205 FORGERY 7 0 3 0 1 0 0 4 4 0 53 1 4 107 0 184 MAL MISCHIEF 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 4 1 0 119 0 4 161 0 292 NON-CRIMINAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 3 3 0 14 PROP OTHER 21 0 9 0 0 0 10 2 3 1 54 0 20 114 0 234 RCRVD VEH 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 18 0 3 45 0 73 STL VEH 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 25 0 3 56 0 88 THEFT 27 0 7 0 0 0 6 4 4 1 118 0 4 215 0 386 UIBOC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VEH OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 20 0 35 VEH PROWL 2 0 3 0 1 0 1 2 1 0 79 0 1 93 0 183 TOTAL PROPERTY CRIMES 68 0 25 0 2 0 25 18 15 5 590 1 42 903 0 1,694 ASSAULT 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 6 2 2 45 0 10 71 0 142 DOA/SUICIDE 2 0 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 24 0 0 20 0 51 DV 11 0 1 0 2 0 0 3 2 1 39 0 3 56 0 118 HOMICIDE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 KIDNAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 3 MENTAL 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 16 0 5 20 0 45 MP 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 14 0 22 PERS OTHER 9 0 15 0 1 0 14 11 5 1 161 1 25 241 0 484 ROBBERY 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 7 0 13 TEL-HARASS 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 11 0 0 19 0 35 TOTAL MAJOR CRIMES 28 0 23 0 4 0 16 23 11 6 308 1 43 450 0 913 ADULT RAPE 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 10 0 17 CHILD ABUSE 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 CUST INTFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 18 0 29 SEX REGIS F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IND LIBERTY 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 5 MOLES/CHILD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAPE/CHILD 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 RUNAWAY 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 23 0 0 27 0 56 SEX OTHER 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 5 STALKING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 6 SUSP PERSON 4 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 1 16 0 2 27 0 60 TOTAL SEX CRIMES 11 0 5 0 0 0 10 1 1 1 55 0 10 89 0 183 DRUG 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 10 0 7 39 0 59 ITF OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL ITF 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 10 0 7 39 0 59 TOTAL TRAFFIC 21 0 9 0 0 0 14 5 1 1 225 0 50 345 0 671 TOTAL REPORTS RECEIVED 130 0 62 0 6 0 65 47 29 13 1,188 2 152 1,826 0 3,520 1/4/2013 2012 December `f INCIDENTS BY CITIES AH CH DP FC FF LAH LL ML MW RF SCO SPA SPK SV WAV TOTALS CAD INCIDENTS 24 169 238 13 8 4 27 166 85 20 3,505 6 412 4,502 0 9,179 SELF INITIATED INCIDENTS 20 9 149 9 0 1 17 90 34 1 944 2 333 1,691 0 3,300 DRUG SELF INT(PATROL) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 9 0 14 TRAFFIC STOPS 9 1 46 0 0 0 12 23 26 0 442 2 197 1,003 0 1,761 TRAFFIC STOPS(ARST/CIT/IN) 3 0 15 0 0 0 6 6 8 0 185 0 79 416 0 718 TS (WARRANTS) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 6 13 0 21 CALLS FOR SERVICE 4 160 89 4 8 3 10 76 51 19 2,561 4 79 2,811 0 5,879 ALARMS 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 5 2 0 123 1 3 78 0 218 ACCIDENTS 0 7 7 0 0 0 2 5 2 2 578 0 13 270 0 886 ACCIDENTS (ARREST/CIT) 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 1 17 0 30 DRUG CALLS 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 10 0 3 22 0 38 DV 13 0 4 0 3 0 1 6 6 2 130 0 18 197 0 380 DUI 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 78 0 7 85 0 177 DUI (ARREST) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 35 0 39 PURSUITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY 1 12 18 1 0 0 0 14 5 3 292 0 12 515 0 873 VEHICLE RECOVERED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 21 0 1 35 0 58 911 ABANDON LINE 0 47 11 2 1 0 0 11 6 0 188 0 5 267 0 538 SHOPLIFTING 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 46 0 48 ALL ARRESTS(ARREST/CIT/IN) 3 0 27 1 1 0 6 12 12 2 277 0 94 664 0 1,099 CRIME CHECK REPORTS 1 0 24 0 3 0 0 23 13 1 500 2 9 699 0 1,275 1/7/2013 *Wane .00.0Va11ey. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT December 2012 AGREEMENTS FOR SERVICES ADOPTED AND IN OPERATION Contract Total %of Budget Contract Name Contractor Amount Expended as Expended of 12/31/12 Street Maintenance Poe Asphalt $1,545,119.00 $1,530,099.96 99.03% Street Sweeping AAA Sweeping $530,199.94 $520,590.03 98.19% Storm Drain Cleaning AAA Sweeping $199,990,00 $192,375.81 96.19% Snow Removal Poe Asphalt $140,000.00 $19,354.27 13.82% Landscaping Ace Landscaping $78,386.00 $78,386.00 100.00% Emergency Traffic Control Senske $10,000.00 $8,562.71 85.63% Litter and Weed Control Geiger Work Crew $63,318.88 State Highway Maintenance WSDOT $215,000.00 $172,407.30 80.19% Traffic Signals, Signs,Striping Spokane County $632,000.00 $611,921.88 96.82% Dead Animal Control Brad Southard $15,785.00 **-The Snow Removal Contract with Poe Asphalt was not signed until late January 2012, this total reflects amounts after the contract was signed CITIZEN ACTION REQUESTS Citizen Requests for Public Works 80 70 I 64 so — I e --- 40 30 — l 20 — u 10 — 1 I I 1 I on i i NE i i 0 Total Citizen Snow Dead Roadway Pothole Sign& Traffic Requests: Removal Animal Hazard Requests Signal Graffiti Requests Public Removal Requests Works •Submitted 73 7 22 9 4 20 5 6 •In Progress 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 iIResolved 72 7 22 8 4 20 5 6 *information in bold indicates updates 1 WASTEWATER Status of the process can be monitored at: http:/fwww.spokaneriver,net/ http://www.ecy.wa.qov/programs/wgltmdf/spokaneriver/dissolved oxygen/status.html http:/fwww.spokanecounty.orq/utilities/WaterReclamation/content.aspx?c=2224 and http://vvww,spokaneriverpartners.com/ REGIONAL SOLID WASTE SYSTEM No action PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN Most of the planned projects were completed in 2012 except for Pines -- 16th to 24th and Sprague Ave (Park to Thierman) which will be carried over and finished in 2013. An RFQ advertisement for qualified firms to submit proposals to perform data collection, evaluation, and update the pavement management plan went out on October 19. A contract was executed with IMS to prepare the 2013 update to the Pavement Management Plan. CAPITAL PROJECTS (See attached Capital Projects Spreadsheet) STREET MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY The following is a summary of Public Works/Contractor maintenance activities in the City of Spokane Valley for December 2012: • The Geiger crew continued with garbage pickup on arterials and miscellaneous projects in rights of way throughout the city. • Completed stormwater repairs on 8th Avenue east of Pines Road. STORMWATER UTILITY Stormwater Capital Improvement Project Development 1. Stormwater Decant Facility An agreement was executed with KPFF Consulting Engineers to perform a type, size, and location study by the end of the year for the WSDOT site. Preferred alternative was agreed upon between WSDOT and City staff. The consultant is finishing the study report. Staff continues working with WSDOT representatives to complete a Draft Interlocal Agreement for the design, construction, and long-term operations and maintenance of the decant facility proposed for the WSDOT Pines Road location. 2. 2012 Stormwater Small Works projects - Repair, replace or improve problems on the stormwater list, First project package to go out to bid in January 2013 includes Pines/Alki, and Dishman-Mica near Appleway projects. First project package will be for construction in spring 2013. TRAFFIC • Sign Database Updates Spokane County has completed mapping of all new (since incorporation) City streets and is now logging the signs on each road into our sign database. • 1-90 Business Route Skins The request was sent to WSDOT Eastern Region shortly after Council approval. WSDOT Eastern Region expects to forward the request to Olympia in early December. *Information in bold indicates updates 2 o North Spokane Corridor Value Engineering Study Staff is continuing to work with WSDOT to evaluate less expensive alternatives for the completion of the North Spokane Corridor. • Freight and Goods Transportation System Map Staff is using annual traffic counts to estimate the tonnage of freight moved on all arterials in the City. This will be sent to WSDOT for the 2013 update of the state's Freight and Goods Transportation System Map. GRANT APPLICATIONS New Call for Projects O 2013 Quick Response Safety Program The City turned in two applications at the beginning of January. One is to construct the Appleway Trail from University to Evergreen. The other is to replace regulatory and warning signs throughout the City. • SRTC Call for Projects - CMAQ and TA Funds Staff is beginning to look at potential projects to recommend to Council for the upcoming Call for Projects in March this year. *Information in bold indicates updates 3 SI' ) e Public Works Projects '4alley• Monthly Summary-Design& Construction December-2012 Estimated Total Project Proposed %Complete Construction Project # Design&Construction Projects Funding Bid Cate PE I CN Completion Cost Street Projects 0005 Pines/MJanfield,Wilbur Rd to Pines TIB-UCP 05/23/08 100 95 04/30/13 $ 6,573,181 0146 24th Ave Sidewalk Adams to Sullivan TIB-SP 09/14/12 100 0 05/31/13 $ 292,000 0155 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement ft4508 FHWA-3R 12/01/13 55 0 12/31/15 $ 1,000,000 0156 Mansfield Ave Connection FHWA-CMAQ 05/31/13 25 0 12/31/13 $ 1,026,000 0166 Pines Rd.(SR27)&Grace Ave.Int Safety HSIP 04/01/14 0 0 10/31/14 $ 671,050 Street Preservation Projects 0174 2013 Street Preservation Project COSV TBD 10 0 12/15/13 5 50,000 Traffic Projects 0060 Argonne Road Corridor Upgrade(SRTC 06-3 FHWA-CMAQ 03/15/13 95 0 08/31/13 $ 1,290,636 0061 Pines(SR27)ITS Improvements(SRTC 06-2 FHWA-CMAQ 09/21/12 100 0 07/15113 $ 1,833421 0133 Sprague/Sullivan ITS FHWA-CMAQ 09/14/12 100 10 05/31/13 $ 768421 0167 Citywide Safety Improvements HSIP TBD 0 0 06/30/15 $ 474,580 Stormwater Projects 0150 Sullivan Rd Bridge Drain Retrofit Dept of Ecology 05/03/13 95 0 07/01/13 $ 237,375 0163 Sprague Ave.Swale Upgrade, Park to 1-90 Dept of Ecology 08/03/12 100 70 06/30/13 $ 1,006,622 0173 Spokane Valley Regional Decant Facility Ecology/COSVJWSDOT TBD 0 0 12/31/13 $ - Other Projects 0149 Sidewalk I nfill FHWA-CMAQ 08/10/12 60 40 12/30/13 $ 939,955 0168 Wellesley Ave s'walk&Adams Rds'walk SafeRoutes-State 04/12/13 25 0 11/30/13 $ 639,000 0169 Argonne/NI ullan Safety Indiana-Broadway HSIP TBD 0 0 06/30/15 $ 111,750 0170 Argonne Road:Empire Ave-Knox Ave HST TBD 0 0 05/30/15 $ 180,640 0171 Sprague Ave ADA Curb Ramp Project CDBG 01/18/13 99 0 09/01/13 $ 329,300 *Mane Public Works Projects 00'Valley• Monthly Summary- Design only January-2073 I Design Estimated Total Project Complete %Complete Construction Project # Design Only Projects Funding _ Date PE Completion Cost Street Projects 0069 Park Rd Recon.#2 Brdwy&Ind.5RTC06-12 FHWA-STP(U) 10/03/11 90 $ 352,002 0123 Mission Ave-Flora to Barker FHWA-STPIU} 09/30/13 5 $ 517,919 0141 Sullivan&Euclid PCC FHWA-STPIU} 11/15/13 20 $ 175,260 0142 Broadway @Argonne/Mullan FHWA-STPIU) 10/31/13 10 $ 276,301 Traffic Projects 0159 University Road Overpass Study FHWA-CMAQ 12/01/13 2 $ 249,711 Other Projects 0145 Spokane Valley-Millwood Trail FHWA-STP(E) 02/15/13 0 $ 745,000 1 Spokane Valley Planning Commission Approved Minutes Council Chambers — City Hall, 11797 E. Sprague Ave. December 13, 2012 I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Bates called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Il. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance III. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS Present Absent CITY STAFF Bill Bates -Chair FY1 i— John Hohrnan,CD Director John G.Carroll r � Scott Kuhta, Planning Manager Rustin 1-fall r 1W Lori Barlow, Senior Planner Rod Higgins I— Steven Neill I--' Fred Beaulac l— lw Joe Stoy—Vice Chair r Deanna Griffith, secretary Hearing no objections, Commissioners Carroll and Beaulac were excused. IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Commissioner Stoy moved to approve the agenda as presented. The motion was passed unanimously. V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Neill moved to approve the November 8, 2012 minutes as presented. The motion was passed rtnanitnously. VL PUBLIC COMMENT There was no public comment. VII. COMMISSION REPORTS Commissioners had nothing to report. VIII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS Community Development Director John Hohrnan thanked outgoing Planning Commissioner Rustin hall. Mr. Hall commended the quality of City staff and expressed his appreciation and Planning Commission Minutes 12-3-]2,Approved 1 I-10-13 Page 1 of 3 honor to be a member of the PIanning Commission. Chair Bates also thanked Mr. 1-tall for his efforts. 1X. COMMISSION BUSINESS A. Unfinished Business: The Commission reviewed Findings and Recommendation document for CTA-04-12, amending Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 19.40.120, 19.40.140, 19.60.010, 19.70.010, and 19.70.020 in order to clarify home occupations in nonresidential zones; clarify Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) in nonresidential zones; clarify Recreational Vehicle (RV) use in nonresidential zones; establish residential development standards in nonresidential zones; establish standards for manufactured homes in manufactured home subdivisions. Mr. Higgins moved to approve the Findings as presented. The Commission voted unanimously to approve die Findings. B. New Business: Senior Planner Lori Barlow led a discussion with the Planning Commission on an increasing trend in building permits for oversized shops/storage structures with a small dwelling unit internal to the structure; where the shop appears to he the primary use located on a parcel. The department recently issued a building permit for a shop with a very small dwelling unit on the upper floor and has received a complaint regarding the structure. Ms. Barlow showed pictures of the shop, which overwhelms the adjacent homes and is out-of- character for the neighborhood. The Municipal Code does not specifically address these types of structures and does not quantify the area that must be dedicated to living space in order to meet the definition of primary use. Ms. Barlow explained that the following definitions have been considered collectively to provide staff with the basis to make a determination regarding the use: Accessory; Dwelling Unit; Principal Structure; and Principal Use. CutTently, staff has made the interpretation that the primary use allowed, which is the dwelling, must consume the largest area within the structure in order to be consistent with the intent of the code and protect the character of the neighborhood. A prior administrative interpretation required that at least 51% of the structure be the dwelling portion; however, subsequent interpretations required the dwelling portion of the structure to only meet minimum building code requirements ler a dwelling, which can be as small as 300 square feet and include cooking, sleeping and sanitary facilities. Ms. Barlow discussed potential code changes that would address these circumstances. The Planning Commission agreed that staff should consider changes to the Municipal Code. Staff will brief City Council to determine if they also agree that a Code Text Amendment would be appropriate, and then follow up as necessary. X. GOOD OF THE ORDER There was nothing for the good of the order. Planning Commission Minutes 12-3-12,Approved 01-10-13 Page 2 of 3 XI, ADJOURNMENT The being no other business the meeting was adjourned at 7 p.m. Cake was served for Iutgoing Commis-'once Dustin Hall. . Bill Bates, Chairperson • Deanna Griffith, PC S- e rp Date signed i-fV- f, Planning Commission Minutes 12-3-12 Page 3 of 3 S ol€ib� c�r an Parks and Recreation Department 40000V alley 2426 N. Discovery Place • Spokane Valley, WA 99216 �1 509.688.0300 Fax: 509.688.0188 parksandrec@spokanevalley.org Memorandum To: City Council Members; Mike Jackson, City Manager From: Michael D. Stone, CPRP, Director of Parks and Recreation Date: January 16, 2013 Re: Park/Library Joint Site Development Plan Consultant Selection Update As you are all aware, the Sprague property was officially purchased on October 31, 2012. As per our Memorandum of Understanding, both the City and the Spokane County Library District have one year to develop a joint site plan for this project. I wanted to take a moment to update you as to our progress. Staff developed a Request for Qualifications for this project that was advertised in December 2012. Submittals were due on December 17, 2012 and we received 15. A selection committee was formed made up of three representatives from the Library District and three representatives from the City. The selection committee has met and created a short-list of five consultant teams to interview. We are currently scheduling the interviews with our goal of completing them before the end of January. Once we have selected the consultant team we wish to work with, we will mutually develop a scope of work and then negotiate a fee and contract. If the scheduling works out as envisioned, we hope to update City Council on the contract cost and the Committee's selection at the February 19 Council Meeting and receive Council consensus to expend the necessary funds. The funds for the site plan were not included in the 2013 budget and later in the year the Finance Director will bring forth a budget amendment for Council motion. If you have any questions or need additional information please let me know. Thank you.