2013, 02-05 Study Session AGENDA
SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
STUDY SESSION FORMAT
Tuesday,February 5,2013 6:00 p.m.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11707 East Sprague Avenue,First Floor
(Please Silence Your Cell Phones During the Meeting)
DISCUSSION LEADER SUBJECT/ACTIVITY GOAL
ROLL CALL
ACTION ITEM:
1.Mayor Towey Appointment of Candidate for Interim Council Appointment
Position#5 [no public comment]
(Followed by City Clerk administering
Oath of Office)
2.Marty Palaniuk Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 13-001 Ordinance Adoption
Code Text Amendments CTA 04-12
[public comment]
3.Morgan Koudelka ESRI Interlocal for GSI Services with Spokane Motion Consideration
County [public comment]
NON-ACTION ITEMS:
4.Mike Basinger 2013 Comprehensive Plan Docket Discussion/Information
5.Mike Jackson and Accomplishments Report for 2012 Discussion/Information
Department Directors
6.Mayor Towey Advance Agenda Discussion/Information
7. Information Only (will not be reported or discussed):
(a)Parks &Recreation Quarterly Report (b)Stormwater Projects
8.Mayor Towey Council Check in Discussion/Information
9.Mike Jackson City Manager Comments Discussion/Information
ADJOURN
Note: Unless otherwise noted above,there will be no public comments at Council Study Sessions. However,Council always reserves the right to
request information from the public and staff as appropriate. During meetings held by the City of Spokane Valley Council,the Council reserves the
right to take"action"on any item listed or subsequently added to the agenda. The term"action"means to deliberate,discuss,review,consider,evaluate,
or make a collective positive or negative decision. NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate
physical,hearing,or other impairments,please contact the City Clerk at(509)921-1000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made.
Study Session Agenda,February 5,2013 Page 1 of 1
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: February 5,2013 Department Director Approval: n
Check all that apply: n consent n old business ®new business n public hearing
n information n admin. Report n pending legislation n executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Appointment of Candidate to Interim Council Position #1
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35A.13.020,RCW 42.12.070
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: January 8, 2013, Council approved the procedure for
filling a council vacancy. Five Candidate interviews were held during the January 29, 2013 council
meeting: Kevin Anderson,Amy Biviano,Rod Higgins,Linda Thompson, and Sam Wood.
BACKGROUND: Once Council makes the appointment, the newly appointed Councilmember's term
would begin immediately and end once the November 2013 general election results are certified,which is
expected to be November 26,2013.
Approved Voting Process to Appoint Interim Councilmember:
1. A City Council member may nominate an applicant to fill the vacancy. A second is required. If no
second is received,that applicant shall not be considered further unless no applicant receives a second, in
which case all applicants who were nominated may be considered again. Once the nominations are given,
the Mayor will close the nominations and Council will proceed to vote.
2.Any vote to approve an applicant shall be by voice or raised hand in the affirmative or negative.
3. The vacancy can only be filled if a majority of the City Council present affirmatively votes for the
applicant, i.e. if five City Council members are present, this would require at least three out of five City
Council members voting for an applicant.
If a candidate receives a majority of votes,that candidate is the Interim Councilmember.
4. If no applicant receives a majority of votes from the City Council, then the three applicants receiving
the most affirmative votes would be considered in a second round. In a second round of consideration,
the same process would be followed as before to determine if one applicant receives a majority of
affirmative votes. If one of the three applicants still fails to receive a majority of affirmative,then the two
applicants of the three who received the most affirmative votes would then be considered in a third round.
In a third round of consideration, the same process would be followed as before to determine if one
applicant receives a majority of affirmative votes. In the possible case of a vote resulting in one applicant
gaining the most votes (but not a majority of votes of all councilmembers) and a three-way tie of three
other candidates, Council will proceed with a second vote.
5. In the event the City Council fails after three rounds to arrive at a majority vote for an applicant, then
the City Manager shall flip a coin to determine who shall fill the vacancy, with the applicant whose last
name is closest to the letter A being assigned"heads" and the other person assigned"tails."
Seating of New City Council Member:
1. Once an applicant has either received a majority of votes or wins the coin flip, the City Clerk shall
administer the oath of office, and the new councilmember will be officially seated as a City Council
member.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
1.Nomination and second of candidate: "I nominate as the Interim Councilmember
to fill council position#1." [for each nomination]
2.After all nominations,Mayor closes nominations.
3.Vote for candidate(by show of hands)
4. Clerk Administers Oath of Office to new Interim Councilmember
5. Councilmember takes position at the dial.
STAFF/COUNCIL CONTACT: Mayor Towey,Mike Jackson
ATTACHMENTS:
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: February 5,2013 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: n consent n old business ®new business n public hearing
n information n admin.report n pending legislation n executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 13-001, Amending SVMC Title 19.40,
19.60, and 19.70.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A.106; SVMC 17.80.150 and 19.30.040
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: 1st Reading and Administrative report
BACKGROUND: This amendment is intended to clarify issues in the SVMC that have previously been
addressed and/or allowed Director Interpretations or management decisions. This amendment seeks to
formalize these decisions by addressing the following areas in the SVMC:
1. Home occupations in the mixed use,commercial and industrial zones;
2. Accessory Dwelling Units in the mixed use,commercial and industrial zones;
3. Recreational Vehicles in the mixed use,commercial and industrial zones;
4. Residential development standards in the Mixed Use Center and Corridor Mixed Use zones;
5. Manufactured homes in manufactured home subdivisions.
On November 8, 2012,the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the amendment.
Following public testimony and deliberations, the Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the
amendment.
On January 15, 2013 staff provided an administrative report to City Council. Council consensus was to
move the amendment to a First Ordinance Reading.
On January 22, 2013 a First Ordinance Reading was conducted. After hearing public comment, Council
moved to advance the Ordinance to a second reading. Staff amended the heading on SVMC 19.40.20 to
clarify that the section only applies to manufactured homes on individual lots. Manufactured home parks
are regulated in SVMC 19.40.130,so that section was added to the ordinance for clarity,though there are no
changes to that section.
OPTIONS: Approve the ordinance as drafted as modified, or take other appropriate action.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: "I move to approve Ordinance 13-001."
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:None
STAFF CONTACT: Martin Palaniuk,Planning Technician
ATTACHMENTS: Draft Ordinance 13-001
DRAFT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 13-001
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON AMENDING SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS
19.40.120, 19.40.140, 19.60.010, 19.70.010, AND 19.70.020 TO ALLOW HOME
OCCUPATIONS, ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS AND RECREATIONAL VEHICLES
IN MIXED USE, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONES; TO ALLOW USED
MANUFACTURED HOMES IN MANUFACTURED HOME SUBDIVISIONS; TO INCLUDE
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR MIXED USE ZONES, AND OTHER
MATTERS RELATING THERETO.
WHEREAS, on September 25, 2007, the City of Spokane Valley (City) adopted Spokane Valley
Municipal Code (SVMC)Title 19,pursuant to Ordinance 07-015; and
WHEREAS,on October 28,2007, SVMC Title 19 became effective;and
WHEREAS, such regulations are authorized by RCW 36.70A; and
WHEREAS, the amendments set forth below are consistent with the goals and policies of the City's
Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, on October 19, 2012 and October 26, 2012, notice of the Planning Commission public
hearing was published in the Valley News Herald; and
WHEREAS, on October 25, 2012, the Washington State Department of Commerce was notified
pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106,providing a 60-day notice of intent to adopt amendments to the Spokane Valley
Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS,on October 25,2012,the Planning Commission held a study session; and
WHEREAS, SVMC 19.40.040, 19.40.120, 19.60.010, 19.70.010 and 19.70.020, as amended, bear a
substantial relation to the public health, safety and welfare and protection of the environment; and
WHEREAS, on November 8, 2012, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, received
evidence, information, public testimony, and a staff report with a recommendation followed by deliberations
and provided a recommendation; and
WHEREAS, on December 13, 2012, the Planning Commission approved the findings and
recommendations; and
WHEREAS,on January 15,2013,City Council reviewed the proposed amendment; and
WHEREAS, on January 22, 2013, City Council considered a first ordinance reading to adopt the
proposed amendment.
NOW,THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley do ordain as follows:
Ordinance 13-001 Page 1 of 13
DRAFT
Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend SVMC 19.40.040, 19.40.120,
19.60.010, 19.70.010 and 19.70.020.
Section 2. Findings. The City Council acknowledges that the Planning Commission conducted
appropriate investigation and study, held a public hearing on the proposed amendments and recommends
approval of the amendments. The City Council hereby adopts the findings of the Planning Commission,
specifically that:
Growth Management Act Policies
1. The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) provides that each city shall
adopt a comprehensive land use plan and development regulations that are consistent
with and implement the comprehensive plan.
City of Spokane Valley Goals and Policies
2. The City of Spokane Valley has adopted goals and policies consistent with the GMA
and adopted CWPP.
Land Use Goal LUG-9: Encourage the development of Mixed-use areas that foster
community identity and are designed to support pedestrian,bicycle and regional transit.
Land Use Policy LUP-9.2: The mix of land uses allowed in either the Corridor Mixed-use
or Mixed-use Center designation should include:
• A full range of retail goods and services including grocery stores,
theaters/entertainment,restaurants,personal services and specialty shops;
• Public/quasi-public uses
• Commercial uses that require large land uses but have low employment density and
are auto-dependent, such as lumber yards, plant nurseries, warehouses and auto
dealerships, should be prohibited from either Mixed-use category.
Housing Goal HG-1: Encourage diversity in design to meet the housing needs of the
residents of the community and region.
Housing Policy HP-1.1: Consider the economic impact of development regulations on the
cost of housing.
Housing Policy HP-1.2: Streamline the development review process and strive to
eliminate unnecessary time delays and expenses.
Housing Policy HP-1.3: Establish development regulations and incentives for greater
diversity of housing types,costs and designs,that may include bonus incentives,
clustering,and transfer of development rights.
Housing Policy HP-1.4: Encourage mixed-use residential/commercial development in
designated areas throughout the City with the use of developer incentives and design
standards.
Economic Goal EDG-7: Maintain a regulatory environment that offers flexibility,
consistency,predictability and clear direction.
Economic Policy EDP-7.1: Evaluate,monitor and improve development standards to
promote compatibility between adjacent land uses; and update permitting processes to
ensure that they are equitable,cost-effective, and expeditious.
Economic Policy EDP-7.2: Review development regulations periodically to ensure
clarity,consistency and predictability.
Ordinance 13-001 Page 2 of 13
DRAFT
Neighborhood Goal NG-2: Preserve and protect the character of Spokane Valley's
residential neighborhoods.
Neighborhood Policy NP-2.1: Maintain and protect the character of existing and future
residential neighborhoods through the development and enforcement of the City's land use
regulations and joint planning.
Neighborhood Policy NP-2.2: Review and revise as necessary, existing land use
regulations to provide for innovation and flexibility in the design of new residential
developments, accessory dwelling units, and in-fill development.
Section 3. Spokane Valley Municipal Code 19.40.120 is amended as follows:
19.40.120 Manufactured heugHomes on Individual Lots
A. Pursuant to the requirements of RCW 35.21.684,the City does not discriminate against consumers'
choices in the placement or use of a home that is not equally applicable to all homes.This section
applies only to manufactured housing units placed on individual lots.
B. Homes built to 42 U.S.C. 70 Sections 5401 through 5403 standards(as they may be amended) are
regulated for the purposes of siting in the same manner as site-built homes, factory-built homes,or
homes built to any other state construction or local design standard;provided,however,that the
manufactured home shall:
1.Be a new manufactured home; and
2.Be set upon a permanent foundation,as specified by the manufacturer, and that the space from
the bottom of the home to the ground be enclosed by concrete or an approved product which can be
either load-bearing or decorative; and
3. Comply with all local design standards,including the requirement for a pitched roof with a slope
of not less than 3:12, applicable to all other homes within the neighborhood in which the
manufactured home is to be located; and
4. Be thermally equivalent to the state energy code; and
5. Otherwise meet all other requirements for a designated manufactured home as defined in RCW
35.63.160.
C. This section does not override any legally recorded covenants or deed restrictions of record.
A"new manufactured home"means any manufactured home required to be titled under RCW Title 46,
which has not been previously titled to a retail purchaser, and is not a used mobile home as defined in
RCW 82.45.032(2).
A"designated manufactured home"is a manufactured home constructed after June 15, 1976,in
accordance with state and federal requirements for manufactured homes,which:
1. Is comprised of at least two fully enclosed parallel sections each of not less than 12 feet wide by
36 feet long; and
2.Was originally constructed with and now has a composition or wood shake or shingle,coated
metal,or similar roof of nominal 3:12 pitch; and
Ordinance 13-001 Page 3 of 13
DRAFT
3. Has exterior siding similar in appearance to siding materials commonly used on conventional
site-built International Building Code single-family residences.
D.An existing single wide manufactured home may be replaced with a new single wide manufactured
home when replacement is initiated within 12 months of the date of damage which represents less than
80 percent of market value,or removal of existing habitable manufactured home.
E. Manufactured homes with dimensional features that match or closely match the predominant
manufactured home type within a manufactured home subdivision may be placed in the manufactured
home subdivision without regard to the age of the manufactured home.
19.40.130 Manufactured home parks.
A.Manufactured home parks shall require approval of a binding site plan,which includes a detailed
site development plan in compliance with the development standards of this code.
B. The site development plan will be reviewed and approved for compliance with ordinances and
standards by the Spokane County utilities department, Spokane County regional health district and
other appropriate agencies.
C.Manufactured housing parks shall not exceed seven units per acre with a minimum of 3,600 square
feet per space.
D. The maximum building coverage for each manufactured home space shall be 50 percent;provided,
that open patio covers, awnings, and/or carports shall not be considered buildings when calculating
this coverage.
E. Each manufactured home space shall be a minimum of 45 feet in width with direct frontage on a
public or private road.
F. The minimum setbacks for manufactured homes at park perimeter are as follows:
1. Twenty-five feet from all public rights-of-way.
2. Side yard: 10 feet from park perimeter at the overall site lot side line.
3. Rear yard: 10 feet from park perimeter at the overall site lot rear line.Three feet for any
accessory structure such as patio covers, awnings and/or carports.
G.Minimum setbacks for individual in-park spaces:
1.Front and flanking yards: four feet.
2. Side and rear yard: five feet.
Ordinance 13-001 Page 4 of 13
DRAFT
3.Accessory structures such as patio covers,awnings, and/or carports: three feet. (Ord. 07-015 § 4,
2007).
Section 4. Spokane Valley Municipal Code 19.40.040 is amended as follows:
19.40.140 Home occupations
A. Applicability. Any person, group or entity conducting a "for profit" enterprise from a location
whose primary use is a residence must obtain a home occupation permit. A home occupation may be
established in a residence that has been legally permitted. Businesses may be exempt from the home
occupation permit fee, as established by the master fee schedule,if all of the following criteria are met:
1. There are no proposed exterior alterations to the residence or any accessory structure(s) which
change the residential character of the property;
2. Goods and commodities associated with the business are not delivered to the premises;
3. There are no business customers visiting the premises;
4. There are no signs or window displays on the property related to the business; and
5.Any employees engaged in the business must live in the residence (no outside employees).
B. Home occupations are permitted as accessory uses, except as indicated by subsection C of this
section,incidental to the property's principal use as a residence, subject to the following requirements:
1. Property shall retain a residential appearance and character;
2. All storage shall be enclosed within the residence or accessory structure;
3. There shall be a limit of two employees not residing on the premises engaged in the home
occupation;
4. One unlighted sign placed flush against the exterior wall of the principal structure not exceeding
four square feet in area is permitted;
5. There shall be no window display nor shall sample commodities with the exception of flowers
and produce grown on the premises be displayed outside the building(s);
6. The hours of operation of a home occupation are limited to 7:00 a.m.to 10:00 p.m.;
7. The home occupation use shall not create electronic interference including, but not limited to,
interference with radio, satellite reception, telephone or television reception, nor generate
measurable levels at the property line of noise, dust, smoke, odor or glare. The home occupation
activity shall not generate solid waste in volume or type which is not normally associated with
residential use unless specifically permitted;
8. Loading docks and mechanical loading devices are not permitted;
Ordinance 13-001 Page 5 of 13
DRAFT
9. No traffic or parking of vehicles shall be generated by a home occupation in greater volumes
than normally expected in a residential neighborhood and any need for parking must be
accommodated within the required off-street parking for the dwelling unit; and
10. Uses which are detrimental to the existing residential appearance and character are not allowed
as home occupations.
C. Specific uses which are not permitted as home occupations include, but are not limited to, the
following: adult retail use establishment, adult bookstore or adult entertainment establishment; auto
repair; welding or metal plating shops; large appliance/electronics or equipment repair or service;
small engine repair; truck hauling and/or tow storage yard; vehicle sales; cabinet making;
manufacturing and/or related storage; kennel or stables; wholesale or retail sales; and
restaurants/drinking establishments.
Section 5. Spokane Valley Municipal Code 19.60.010 is amended as follows:
19.60.010 General requirements
A. Nonresidential development shall meet the minimum setback and the maximum height
requirements shown in Table 19.60-1.
B. Residential development shall meet the minimum residential development standards for the MF-2
zone shown in Table 19.40-1 with the exception that the following setbacks shall apply (NOTE:
alternate setbacks apply to multi-family adjacent to single-family uses or zoning. See 19.60.070 and
19.60.080):
Front yard setback: 20 feet
Rear yard setback: 10 feet
Side yard setback: 5 feet
Side yard—Flanking street setback: 20 feet
Residential use adjacent to a nonresidential use
Side yard(without living space window): 5 feet
Side yard(with living space window): 10 feet
C. A home occupation may be established in a residence that has been legally permitted, excluding
caretaker dwellings.
D. Attached and detached Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) are permitted in all zoning districts that
permit single-family dwellings and shall adhere to the appearance of single-family residences. An
attached ADU is an accessory dwelling unit that has one or more vertical and/or horizontal walls in
common with, or attached to,the principal dwelling unit. A detached ADU is a freestanding accessory
dwelling unit that is not attached or physically connected to the principal dwelling unit. Accessory
dwelling units shall meet all provisions contained in SVMC 19.40.100,
E. Recreational vehicles shall not be used as permanent or temporary dwelling units in any mixed use
or commercial zone except in manufactured home parks. Guests may park and/or occupy a recreational
vehicle while visiting the occupants of a dwelling unit located on the same lot for not more than 30
days in one consecutive 12-month period. The intent is to accommodate visiting guests and not to
allow the recreational vehicle to be used as a dwelling unit.
BF. Parking areas shall be paved and landscaped in accordance with Chapter 22.50 SVMC.
Ordinance 13-001 Page 6 of 13
DRAFT
CG.New development exceeding three stories in height shall be provided with paved service lanes not
less than 16 feet in width.
I DH.All new development shall provide for shared access with adjacent properties.
I
I. All outdoor trash, garbage and refuse storage areas shall be screened on all sides visible to public
views or rights-of-way with a minimum five-and-one-half-foot-high concrete block or masonry wall or
sight-obscuring fence with a sight-obscuring gate and two feet of Type II landscaping in accordance
with Figure 22.70-8 SVMC.
I FJ. The following structures may be erected above the height limits of this code in the Office,
Commercial, and Mixed Use zones, provided: (1) the structure is accessory to or part of a building
which is a permitted use in the zone; (2) the structure complies with the height limits in the Airport
Overlay zone; and (3) no residential use of the structure shall occur above the height limits prescribed
in the zone:
1. Penthouses or roof structures for the housing of elevators, stairways, tanks, ventilating fans, or
similar equipment to operate and maintain a building.
2. Fire or parapet walls, skylights, flagpoles, chimneys, church steeples, belfries, wireless masts,
and similar structures.
3. Structures such as silos, feed mills, batch plants, and fixed cranes which are used in a
manufacturing process which utilizes vertical processing and storage of materials.
4. Water stand pipes and tanks.
I GK.The following features attached to structures are allowed as exceptions to the setback standards:
1. Minor Projections Allowed. Minor features of a structure, such as eaves, chimneys, fire escapes,
bay windows no more than 12 feet long and which cantilever beyond the foundation of the
structure, uncovered stairways, wheelchair ramps and uncovered decks or balconies, may extend
into a required structure setback up to 20 percent of the depth of the setback. However, they may
not be within three feet of a lot line when a setback is required.
2. Full Projections Allowed. In addition to subsection (G)(1) of this section, the following features
are allowed to project farther into the required structure setback:
a. Canopies,marquees, awnings and similar features may fully extend into a street setback and
may extend into the public right-of-way subject to the requirements of the building code and
adopted street standards.
b. Uncovered stairways and wheelchair ramps that lead to one entrance on the street-facing
facade of a building may fully extend into a street setback.
c. Uncovered decks and stairways that are no more than 42 inches above the ground may fully
extend into a required structure setback.
d. On lots that slope down from the street, vehicular and pedestrian entry bridges that are no
more than 42 inches above the average sidewalk elevation may fully extend into a required
structure setback.
Ordinance 13-001 Page 7 of 13
DRAFT
e.Balconies may extend into public rights-of-way as allowed in the building code and adopted
street standards.
f. Attached mechanical equipment such as heat pumps, air conditioners, emergency generators
and water pumps are allowed to project into the side or rear yard setback only.
44L.Mobile food vendors with permission of the property owner,health certificate and permit.
4M. Community facilities and public utility distribution facility(ies), except power poles and
underground transformers,shall comply with the following conditions:
1. The requirements for landscaping, signage,lighting and other requirements shall apply.
2. Type I landscape screening is required along property line(s) adjacent to a residential use or
zone.
41\1. Public utility transmission facility shall comply with the following conditions:
1. The utility company shall secure the necessary property or right-of-way to assure for the property
construction, continued maintenance, and general safety to the property adjoining the public utility
transmission facility;
2. All support structures for electric transmission lines shall have their means of access located a
minimum of 10 feet above ground;
3. The facilities shall be compatible with the surrounding uses either by distance, landscaping,
buffering,or design, as determined by the director; and
4. The height of any structure above ground does not exceed 125 feet.
Section 6. Spokane Valley Municipal Code 19.70.010 is amended as follows:
19.70.010 I-1,Light Industrial district
A. The Light Industrial designation is a planned industrial area with special emphasis and attention
given to aesthetics,landscaping and internal and community compatibility. Typical uses would include
technology and other low-impact industries. Light Industrial areas may also include office and
commercial uses as ancillary uses within an overall plan for industrial development.
B. Supplemental Regulations.
1. The outdoor storage provisions contained in SVMC 19.60.060(B)shall apply to the I-1 district.
2. Mobile food vendors shall be located on/within designated areas which do not interfere with
parking or internal circulation with permission of the property owner,health certificate and permit.
3. Setbacks.
a.Front and flanking street yard setbacks shall be 20 feet; and
b. Side and rear yard setbacks of 35 feet are required only adjacent to residential zoning
districts.
Ordinance 13-001 Page 8 of 13
DRAFT
4. The following structures may be erected above the height limits of this code, provided: (a) the
structure is accessory to or part of a building which is a permitted use in the zone; (b)the structure
complies with the height limits in the Airport Overlay zone; and (c) no residential use of the
structure shall occur above the height limits prescribed in the zone:
a. Penthouses or roof structures for the housing of elevators, stairways, tanks,ventilating fans,
or similar equipment to operate and maintain a building.
b. Fire or parapet walls, skylights, flagpoles, chimneys, church steeples, belfries, wireless
masts, and similar structures.
c. Structures such as silos, feed mills, batch plants, and fixed cranes which are used in a
manufacturing process which utilizes vertical processing and storage of materials.
d.Water stand pipes and tanks.
5.All parking,maneuvering and outdoor storage areas shall be paved.
Exemptions:
a. Parking and storage areas routinely used by cleated and other heavy equipment as approved
by the planning director.
b. The planning director may waive portions of these requirements upon recommendation by
the Spokane regional clean air agency or the Spokane Valley development engineering
division when it can be demonstrated that the proposed surfacing, such as grass pavers or other
technology, will not adversely affect air quality, water quality or the integrity of the parking
area.
6. The following features attached to structures are allowed as exceptions to the setback standards:
a. Minor Projections Allowed. Minor features of a structure, such as eaves, chimneys, fire
escapes, bay windows no more than 12 feet long and which cantilever beyond the foundation
of the structure, uncovered stairways, wheelchair ramps and uncovered decks or balconies,
may extend into a required structure setback up to 20 percent of the depth of the setback.
However,they may not be within three feet of a lot line when a setback is required.
b. Full Projections Allowed. In addition to subsection (B)(6)(a) of this section, the following
features are allowed to project farther into the required structure setback:
i. Canopies,marquees,awnings and similar features may fully extend into a street setback
and may extend into the public right-of-way subject to the requirements of the building
code and adopted street standards.
ii. Uncovered stairways and wheelchair ramps that lead to one entrance on the street-
facing facade of a building may fully extend into a street setback.
iii.Uncovered decks and stairways that are no more than 42 inches above the ground may
fully extend into a required structure setback.
Ordinance 13-001 Page 9 of 13
DRAFT
iv. On lots that slope down from the street,vehicular and pedestrian entry bridges that are
no more than 42 inches above the average sidewalk elevation may fully extend into a
required structure setback.
v. Balconies may extend into public rights-of-way as allowed in the building code and
adopted street standards.
vi. Attached mechanical equipment such as heat pumps, air conditioners, emergency
generators and water pumps are allowed to project into the side or rear yard setback only.
7. Community facilities and public utility distribution facility(ies), except power poles and
underground transformers,shall comply with the following conditions:
a. The requirements for landscaping, signage,lighting and other requirements shall apply.
b. Type I landscape screening is required along property line(s) adjacent to a residential use or
zone.
8. Public utility transmission facility shall comply with the following conditions:
a. The utility company shall secure the necessary property or right-of-way to assure for the
property construction, continued maintenance, and general safety to the property adjoining the
public utility transmission facility;
b. All support structures for electric transmission lines shall have their means of access located
a minimum of 10 feet above ground;
c. The facilities shall be compatible with the surrounding uses either by distance, landscaping,
buffering,or design, as determined by the director; and
d. The height of any structure above ground does not exceed 125 feet.
9. The following shall apply to all secondhand stores and consignment sales:
a. The subject parcel must have frontage on an arterial; and
b.Minimum building size of 15,000 gross square feet(gsf); and
c. Limited to a single tenant.
10. A home occupation may be established in a residence that has been legally permitted,
excluding caretaker dwellings.
11. Recreational vehicles shall not be used as permanent or temporary dwelling units. Guests may
park and/or occupy a recreational vehicle while visiting the occupants of a dwelling unit located on
the same lot for not more than 30 days in one consecutive 12-month period. The intent is to
accommodate visiting guests and not to allow the recreational vehicle to be used as a dwelling unit.
Ordinance 13-001 Page 10 of 13
DRAFT
Section 7. Spokane Valley Municipal Code 19.70.020 is amended as follows:
19.70.020 I-2,Heavy Industrial district
A. Heavy Industrial designated property is characterized by intense industrial activities which include
manufacturing, processing, fabrication, assembly, freight handling and similar operations. Heavy
industry may have significant noise,odor or aesthetic impacts.
B. Supplemental Regulations.
1. I-2 allows any use permitted in the I-1 zoning district, except as specifically provided in
Appendix 19-A.
2. Mobile food vendors shall be located on/within designated areas which do not interfere with
parking or internal circulation with permission of the property owner,health certificate and permit.
3. The following structures may be erected above the height limits of this code,provided:
(a) the structure is accessory to or part of a building which is a permitted use in the zone; (b) the
structure complies with the height limits in the Airport Overlay zone; and (c) no residential use of
the structure shall occur above the height limits prescribed in the zone:
a. Penthouses or roof structures for the housing of elevators, stairways, tanks,ventilating fans,
or similar equipment to operate and maintain a building.
b. Fire or parapet walls, skylights, flagpoles, chimneys, church steeples, belfries, wireless
masts, and similar structures.
c. Structures such as silos, feed mills, batch plants, and fixed cranes which are used in a
manufacturing process which utilizes vertical processing and storage of materials.
d.Water stand pipes and tanks.
4.All parking,maneuvering and outdoor storage areas shall be paved.
Exemptions:
a. Parking and storage areas routinely used by cleated and other heavy equipment as approved
by the planning director.
b. The planning director may waive portions of these requirements upon recommendation by
the Spokane regional clean air agency or the Spokane Valley development engineering
division when it can be demonstrated that the proposed surfacing, such as grass pavers or other
technology, will not adversely affect air quality, water quality or the integrity of the parking
area.
5. The following features attached to structures are allowed as exceptions to the setback standards:
a. Minor Projections Allowed. Minor features of a structure, such as eaves, chimneys, fire
escapes, bay windows no more than 12 feet long and which cantilever beyond the foundation
of the structure, uncovered stairways, wheelchair ramps and uncovered decks or balconies,
may extend into a required structure setback up to 20 percent of the depth of the setback.
However,they may not be within three feet of a lot line when a setback is required.
Ordinance 13-001 Page 11 of 13
DRAFT
b. Full Projections Allowed. In addition to subsection (B)(5)(a) of this section, the following
features are allowed to project farther into the required structure setback:
i. Canopies,marquees,awnings and similar features may fully extend into a street setback
and may extend into the public right-of-way subject to the requirements of the building
code and adopted street standards.
ii. Uncovered stairways and wheelchair ramps that lead to one entrance on the street-
facing facade of a building may fully extend into a street setback.
iii.Uncovered decks and stairways that are no more than 42 inches above the ground may
fully extend into a required structure setback.
iv. On lots that slope down from the street,vehicular and pedestrian entry bridges that are
no more than 42 inches above the average sidewalk elevation may fully extend into a
required structure setback.
v. Balconies may extend into public rights-of-way as allowed in the building code and
adopted street standards.
6. Community facilities and public utility distribution facility(ies), except power poles and
underground transformers,shall comply with the following conditions:
a. The requirements for landscaping, signage,lighting and other requirements shall apply.
b. Type I landscape screening is required along property line(s) adjacent to a residential use or
zone.
7. Public utility transmission facility shall comply with the following conditions:
a. The utility company shall secure the necessary property or right-of-way to assure for the
property construction, continued maintenance, and general safety to the property adjoining the
public utility transmission facility;
b. All support structures for electric transmission lines shall have their means of access located
a minimum of 10 feet above ground;
c. The facilities shall be compatible with the surrounding uses either by distance, landscaping,
buffering,or design,as determined by the director; and
d. The height of any structure above ground does not exceed 125 feet.
8. A home occupation may be established in a residence that has been legally permitted, excluding
caretaker dwellings.
9. Recreational vehicles shall not be used as permanent or temporary dwelling units. Guests may
park and/or occupy a recreational vehicle while visiting the occupants of a dwelling unit located on
the same lot for not more than 30 days in one consecutive 12-month period. The intent is to
accommodate visiting guests and not to allow the recreational vehicle to be used as a dwelling unit.
Ordinance 13-001 Page 12 of 13
DRAFT
Section 8. All other provisions of SVMC Title 19 not specifically referenced hereto shall remain
in full force and effect.
Section 9. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held
to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality
shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this
Ordinance.
Section 10. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after
publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as
provided by law.
Passed by the City Council this day of February, 2013.
Mayor,Thomas E.Towey
ATTEST:
City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge
Approved as to Form:
Office of the City Attorney
Date of Publication:
Effective Date:
Ordinance 13-001 Page 13 of 13
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: February 5, 2013 Department Director Approval: ❑
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Regional GIS Enterprise License Interlocal
Agreement— Spokane County
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Approved in 2005 and 2009.
BACKGROUND: The City utilizes Geographic Information System (GIS) software for a variety
of purposes that utilize electronic mapping, plotting, and measuring geographical data. Since
2005, the City has utilized a regional enterprise license agreement negotiated between Spokane
County and Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (ESRI). This agreement allows the
City to utilize GIS software licenses without the upfront purchase cost and also provides greater
flexibility by allowing the City to try different types of software and pay for only the amount of
time the software is needed. The agreement also includes fees to online and in-person training
and conferences. This agreement extends this arrangement for four years. The City's cost is
determined based upon the percentage of system licenses we use.
The County negotiated a contract that increases a total of$7,000 per year for the entire system,
resulting in an annual cost increase of 3% in 2014, 2.9% in 2015, and 2.8% in 2016. The City's
proportionate share will increase less than $400 each year if there is no change in the City's
percentage of licenses. The County will begin adding indirect costs in 2013. There was no cost
change for the previous four years.
OPTIONS: Authorize City Manager to execute agreement, acquire more information, pursue in-
house licenses, eliminate GIS licenses.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to Authorize the City Manager to Finalize and
Execute the "Interlocal Agreement for Participation by the City of Spokane, City of Spokane
Valley, Spokane Regional Health District, and the Spokane Regional Transportation Council in
the ESRI/Spokane County, Wa Reconsolidated Enterprise License Agreement No.
2004ESL6082 as Amended and Reconsolidated Pursuant to Amendment 7."
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The cost change is less than $400 annually and has no
significant impact to the budget.
STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Koudelka, Senior Administrative Analyst
ATTACHMENTS: Interlocal Agreement Amendment 7 (Note: Original agreement between
Spokane County and ESRI available from City Clerk)
No. /• — 6008
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF THE EXECUTION OF AN )
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PARTICIPATION BY )
THE CITY OF SPOKANE, CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, ) RESOLUTION
SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT, AND THE )
SPOKANE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COUNCIL )
IN THE ESRI/SPOKANE COUNTY, WA )
RECONSOLIDATED ENTERPRISE LICENSE )
AGREEMENT NO. 2004ESL6082, AS AMENDED AND )
RECONSOLIDATED PURSUANT TO AMENDMENT 7 )
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of RCW 36.32.120(6), the Board of County Commissioners
of Spokane County has the care of County property and the management of County funds and business;and
WHEREAS, on December 14, 2004, pursuant to Resolution No. 2004-1050, the Board of County
Commissioners resolved that: (1) Spokane County acquire and use selected ESR1 software, data,
documentation, technical support and maintenance, and selected training over a three (3)year period from
Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., 380 New York St., Redlands, CA 92373-8100,
("ESRI")subject to a payment of fees, and under the terms and conditions set forth in Enterprise License
Agreement No. 2004ESL6082; and (2) Bill Fiedler, Director of Information Systems, was authorized to
execute, at other than a public meeting, an interlocal agreement with the City of Spokane, City of Spokane
Valley, the Health District, and the Spokane Regional Transportation Council to receive and use selected
software, data and documentation subject to the terms and conditions set forth in Enterprise License
Agreement No. 2004ESL6082; and
WHEREAS, on December 16, 2008, pursuant to Resolution No. 2008-1115, the Board of County
Commissioners resolved that Spokane County enter into an Interlocal Agreement for participation by the
City of Spokane, City of Spokane Valley, Spokane Regional Health District, and the Spokane Regional
Transportation Council in the ESRI/Spokane County, WA Reconsolidated Enterprise License Agreement
No. 2004ESL6082, as Amended and Reconsolidated Pursuant To Amendment 4; and
WHEREAS, Bill Fiedler, Director of Information Systems, has recommended that the Board of
County Commissioners renew the existing Enterprise License Agreement No. 2004ESL6082 for an
additional term, and authorize him to execute, on behalf of Spokane County, the attached, and any future,
Interlocal Agreement for participation by the City of Spokane, City of Spokane Valley, Spokane Regional
Health District, and the Spokane Regional Transportation Council in the ESRI/Spokane County, WA
Reconsolidated Enterprise License Agreement No. 2004ESL6082, as Amended and Reconsolidated
Pursuant To Amendment 7.
NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the Board of County Commissioners of
Spokane County that Bill Fiedler, Director of Information Systems, is hereby authorized to execute on behalf
of Spokane County, at other than an open public meeting,the attached, and any future Interlocal Agreement
for participation by the City of Spokane, City of Spokane Valley, Spokane Regional Health District, and
the Spokane Regional Transportation Council in the ESRI/Spokane County, WA Reconsolidated
Enterprise License Agreement No. 2004ESL6082, as Amended and Reconsolidated Pursuant To
Amendment 7.
RESOLUTION--1
ADOPTED this th day ofJanuar}, 2.013. fil 4 • .1/4. .„,„
com, ,s I,ri-46,
f dee
A.1'I'E,ST;
Commissioner
41, A A — ,'4 AI: 4 444 dA.4,,, A AfibSen /--
a
Danitla Erickson i — A 6 Commissioner ( 12)I) 44/ L_A-c)
Clerk of the Board �--
N.
_ coxes
'ti1 f %I/
4 ,,)
II' q , . p
I.
III •.. 96 .,. '
RESOLUTION—2
Submit to Clerk of the Board with accompanying paperwork(Resolution,Agreements,etc.)
AGENDA SHEET
SUBMITTING DEPARTMENT:Information Systems Department
CONTA CT PERSON_Bill Fiedler
PHONE NUMBER:509-477-5766
CHECK TYPE OF MEETING ITEM BELOW: BELOW FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY:
9:30 AM CEO MEETING;
2:00 PM CONSENT AGENDA:[ Clerk's Resolution No. 1 (5 r 4
BY LEAVE 0 Approved MalorityAJnanIrneus
Denied:Maloritylunanimous _
5-30 PM LEGISLATIVE SESSION;0 Renews/Amends No.
BY LEAVE.E] Pubilc Works No.
Purchasing Dept No.
SPECIAL SE3 ON:
AGENDA TITLE: INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR THE CITY OF SPOKANE'S, CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY'S,
SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH-DISTRICT'S, AND THE SPOKANE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COUNCIL'S
PARTICIPATION IN THE ESRIISPOKANE COUNTY, WA RECONSOLIDATED ENTE=RPRISE LICENSE AGREEMENT
NO. 2004ESL6082, AS AMENDED AND RECCIdSOLIDATED PURSUANT TO AMENDMENT 7
BACKGROUND: (Attach separate sheet(s) if necessary):
Spokane County Infurrnation Services[hector,has requested that the, Director of Information System,is hereby
authorized to execute on behalf of Spokane County at other than an open public meeting the attached and any Future
Interlocal Agreement for the City of Spokane's,City of SpokaneValley'sr Spokane Regional Health District's,and the
Spokane Regional Transportation Council's Participation in the ESRI/Spokane County,WA Reconsolidated Enterprise
License Agreement No. 2004ESL6082,as Amended and Reconsolidated Pursuant To Amendment 7.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Positive: Interlocal Agreement allows for the continuation of the cost sharing of the Spokane County 1 SR1 Enterprise
License Agreement with City of Spokane.City of Spokane Valley,Spokane Regional Health District,and the Spokane
Regional Transportation Council.
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION:
Approval
Si (S'Fir =s lust be I om. = .i before submitting to the Clerk of the Board).
imp
1 L_.of eparfrrl. t 2)i uditoes-a e
:41% tad)
3)all.get Office — 4)Department HeadifEiected Official or
Designated Authority(Requesting Agenda item)
5)Ce+ trot ces Other
❑ This item will need to be codified In the Spokane County Code.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR.PARTICIPATION BY THE CITY OF SPOKANE,
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT, AND
THE SPOKANE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COUNCIL IN THE ESRI/SPOKANE
COUNTY,WA RECONSOLIDATED ENTERPRISE LICENSE AGREEMENT NO
2004ESL6l$2, AS AMENDED AND RECONSOLIDATED PURSUANT TO
AMENDMENT.
f THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into the day of
, 2013 by and between the CITY OF SPOKANE, a municipal
corporation o e State of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at 808
West Spokane Falls Boulevard, Spokane, Washington 99201; the CITY OF SPOKANE
VALLEY, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, having offices for the transaction
of business at 11707 E. Sprague Avenue, Suite 106, Spokane Valley, Washington 99206; the
SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT, a municipal corporation of the State of
Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at 1101 W. College Avenue, Spokane,
Washington 99201: the SPOKANE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COUNCIL, a municipal
corporation of the State of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at 221 W.
First Avenue, Suite 310, Spokane, Washington 99201; and SPOKANE COUNTY, a political
subdivision of the State of Washington having offices for the transaction of business at 1116
West Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260.
The CITY OF SPOKANE, the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, the SPOKANE
REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT, and the SPOKANE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION
COUNCIL are listed as "Participating Eligible Agencies" in Appendix A to the ESRI/Spokane
County, WA Reconsolidated Enterprise License Agreement No. 2004ESL6082, As Amended
and Reconsolidated Pursuant to Amendment 7. For purposes of this Agreement, they are
hereinafter referred to as the Participating Agencies." Spokane County is hereinafter referred to
as the County." Collectively, the Participating Agencies and the County are referred to as "the
Parties."
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of RCW 36.32.120(6), the Board of County
Commissioners of Spokane County has the care of County property and the management of
County funds and business; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 39.34 RCW authorizes public agencies to contract with one
another to perform any governmental service, activity, or undertaking which each public agency
entering into the contract is authorized by law to perform; and
WHEREAS, the Parties have cooperated for many years in the use of Geographic
Information Systems Resources by standardizing on ESRI GIS software in order to jointly build
common interagency GIS data Iayers that have enabled the parties to provide geographic services
that have best met the needs of the community white avoiding duplication of effort and cost, and
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT--1
WHEREAS, in 2004, the Participating Agencies entered into interlocal agreements with
the County to receive and use selected software, data and documentation subject to the Willis and
conditions set forth in Enterprise License Agreement No. 2004ESL6082 between Environmental
Systems Research Institute, Inc.(ESRI), and the County; and
WHEREAS, in 2012, ESRI and the County have entered into the ESRI/Spokane County,
WA Reconsolidated Enterprise License Agreement No. 2004ESL6082, as Amended and
Reconsolidated pursuant to Amendment 7; and
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to reduce GIS software acquisition costs and continue to
improve the efficiency of geographic services provided to the community; and
WHEREAS, the Participating Agencies are desirous of continuing to receive and use
selected software, data and documentation subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the
ESRI/Spokane County, WA Reconsolidated Enterprise License Agreement No. 2004ESL6082,
as Amended and Reconsolidated pursuant to Amendment 7.
WHEREAS,the Parties desire to continue further cooperation by agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration for the mutual terms and conditions contained
herein the parties hereto covenant and agree as follows:
1. Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement is for the County to provide an opportunity for
the Participating Agencies to acquire selected ESRI GIS software licenses, maintenance and
other administrative services/benefits as delineated herein and under the terms and conditions of
the ESRI/Spokane County, WA Reconsolidated Enterprise License Agreement No.
2004ESL6082, As Amended and Reconsolidated Pursuant to Amendment 7 (hereinafter referred
to as "ELA"). Amendment 7 is attached hereto as Addendum A, and incorporated herein by this
reference.
2. Participation. The Participating Agencies have been previously authorized to participate
in the ELA, and have agreed to abide by the terms and conditions of the ELA applicable to a
Licensee by signing this document. ESRI may pursue remedies against a Licensee directly for
noncompliance of the terms of the ELA. Rights specifically granted to the County by ESRI are
not to be extended to the Participating Agencies.
3. Additional Or Revised Terms. The Participating Agencies agree that additional or
revised licensing terms for: (1) upgrades or updates to the Site License Software and Limited
Deployment Software or (2) upgrades or updates non-Site License Software terms may be
incorporated from time to time. These license revisions/updates shall be provided by the County
to the Participating Agencies as they are incorporated into the ELA. Additional or revised terms
and conditions for new software, data, documentation, shall be governed by the ELA, and any
revised terms found in the then-current General License Terms and Conditions and Exhibit I,the
terms of which will be indicated on ESRI's Web site or enclosed in the deliverable's packaging,
depending on the method of delivery. The pricelist(s) for non-Site License Software, Data,
Documentation, maintenance for non-Site License Software items, training or services may be
revised from time to time, but in no event shall pricing contained therein exceed standard
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT--2
commercial pricing. Unless revised via mutual written amendment between ESRI and the
County, the annual ELA fee paid by the County to ESRI is fixed for the term of the agreement.
The items provided by ESRI in exchange for the fee are identified in the ELA and include
selected software (type and quantity defined), maintenance for the defined software, limited
virtual campus training and a fixed amount of ESRI User Conference registration passes.
4. Agreement Is Non-Exclusive. The Participating Agencies agree to officially name ESRI
as their standard and further agrees to act as a reference for other ESRI customers and potential
customers as long as this Agreement remains in effect. Notwithstanding, under no circumstances
shall this Agreement be construed or interpreted as an exclusive dealings agreement and the
Participating Agencies reserve the right to purchase from third parties any of their requirements
for GIS software.
5. Scope Of Services. Services provided by the County Information Systems Department's
GIS Division(ISD-GIS) are as follows:
a. The County's ISD-GIS Division shall administer and manage the ESRI ELA for the
Participating Agencies. The County will have the authority from ESRI to deploy
ESRI Site License Software to the Participating Agencies. Additionally the County
or Eligible Agencies may order training, services, custom software, and maintenance
for standard licenses, or standard licenses for Software, Data, and Documentation
separately under the applicable terms of this Agreement (excluding the Enterprise
License Addendum Terms and Conditions, E512M) as further described in ESRI
ELA Amendment 4.
b. The County shall provide Tier 1 Technical Support via a Central GIS Help Desk. The
County's ISD-GIS Division shall also maintain the official list of the eight (8) named
individuals who may contact ESRI's Technical Support Group directly for Tier 2
Technical Support in Addendum B with at least one individual per Participating
Agency.
c. ESRI Conference Registrations and ESRI Virtual Campus Web-based Training Seats
shall be distributed to the Participating Agencies, based on the percentage a given
agency is contributing to the annual payment of the ELA and County ELA
Administration Fee. The Participating Agencies will be entitled to at least once ESRI
Conference Registrations per year upon request.
ii. Distributions of the ESRI Conference Registrations and ESRI Virtual Campus
Web-based Training Seats will be based on the methods described in Section
6 c4 under INVOICING AND COST SHARING but summed for the entire
year.
iii. Spokane County's ISD-GIS Division shall notify the Participating Agencies of
its ESRI Conference Registrations and ESRI Virtual Campus Web-based
Training Seats allocation for the coming year by January 15th of each year that
the ELA remains in effect.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT--3
6. Invoicing And Cost Sharing. The County shall handle all invoicing associated with the ESRI
ELA as follows.
a. Make annual payments, year nine ($230.000.00), year ten ($237,000.00) and eleven
($244,000.00) and potentially year twelve ($251,000.00) to ESRI within 45 days of the
anniversary date of ESRI ELA of 1 January for the term of the ELA.
b. The County ELA Administration Fee will be $5,000 for the administration of ESRI's
ELA and include a proportional amount based on Information Systems Department's
annual countywide cost allocation rate (Indirect Costs).
c. Year nine through eleven (and potentially year twelve) proration's of County ELA
Administration Fee and ESRI ELA License Fee shall be based on number of ESRI software
licenses keyed to a given agency/licensee. An ESRI software license table will be
maintained by the County's ISD-GIS Division and updated on a monthly basis for each
licensee. Cost allocation of the portion of the ESRI ELA License Fee that a given
agency/licensee would be responsible for will be calculated as follows:
i. Each individual ESRI software license will be associated with its associated standard
ESRI maintenance fee, except for ArcEngine and ArcGIS Runtime (client) licenses
which will be tabulated sans the maintenance fees. See Addendum E for Table of
Standard ESRI Maintenance Fees.
ii. The sum of the standard ESRI maintenance fees for all keyed ESRI software licenses
for given agency will then be calculated.
iii. The sum of all agencies standard maintenance fees will be calculated.
iv. The sum of each agency's individual standard ESRI maintenance fees calculated in
Step 2 will be divided by the sum of all agencies standard maintenance fees calculated
in Step 3. The result of this calculation will then be turned into a percentage by
multiplying by 100. This percentage calculation for each agency will be generated on a
monthly basis.
v. The sum $235,000.00 for year nine, $242,000.00 for year ten, $249,000.00 eleven,
and 255,000.00 for potentially twelve of the annual County ELA Administration Fee
($5,000.00) and the annual ESRI ELA License Fee depending on the year of the
agreement will then be divided by twelve and multiplied by a given agency's monthly
percentage calculated in Step 4 and invoiced to that agency on a monthly basis by the
County's Information Systems Department(ISD). All calculations for Steps 1-5 will be
based on the ESRI software license table maintained by the County's ISD-GIS
Division. This table is included in Addendum C. The Participating Agencies shall
remit the funds due to the County within 30 days of invoicing. Monthly invoicing for
years nine through eleven and potentially twelve begins in January of the preceding
year as ESRI requires maintenance payments in advance for software and maintenance.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT--4
7. Request, Deployment, & Account Procedures Of Newly-Keyed ESRI AGREEMENT Site
License Software. the County's ISD-GIS Division shall maintain the official list authorized
individuals (one per licensee) in Addendum D who have the budget authority to request
additional ESRI software covered by the ESRI AGREEMENT (as defined ESRI ELA
Amendment 4). Requests by a given Eligible Agency for additional ESRI Software License
must be sent to gissupport(a7spokanecounty.org. Newly keyed licenses will be added for that
licensee on a monthly basis to the ESRI software license Table maintained by the County's ISD-
GIS Division(as initially described in Addendum C). Newly keyed licenses will be incorporated
on a monthly basis into the Cost allocation procedures describe in Section 6 c4 under
INVOICING AND COST SHARING.
8. Compliance with Laws. Each party shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws and
regulations.
9. Assignments. This Agreement is binding on the Parties and their heirs, successors, and
assigns. Neither party may assign, transfer or subcontract its interest, in whole or in part, without
the other party's prior written consent.
10. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended at any time by mutual written agreement.
No modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be valid until the same is reduced to
writing and executed with the same formalities as this Agreement.
11. Anti-kickback. No officer or employee of the Participating Agencies, having the power or
duty to perform an official act or action related to this Agreement shall have or acquire any
interest in the contract, or have solicited, accepted or granted a present or future gift, favor,
service or other thing of value from or to any person involved in this contract.
12. Termination. Either party may terminate this Agreement by thirty (30) days' written notice
to the other party. In the event of such termination, the Participating Agencies shall pay for any
work completed up to the thirty(30) days or termination date.
13. Severability. In the event any provision of this Agreement should become invalid, the rest
of the contract shall remain in full force and effect.
14. Nondiscrimination. No individual shall be excluded from participation in, denied benefit of,
subject to discrimination under, or denied employment in the administration of or in connection
with this Agreement because of race, color, creed, marital status, familial status, religion, sex,
sexual orientation, national origin, Vietnam era or disabled veteran status, age, or disability. The
Parties shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local nondiscrimination laws,
regulations and policies.
15. Venue. This Agreement has and shall be construed as having been made and delivered in the
State of Washington and the laws of the State of Washington shall be applicable to its
construction and enforcement. Any action or judicial proceeding for the enforcement of this
1NTERLOCAL AGREEMENT--5
Agreement, or any provision thereof, shall be instituted only in a court of competent jurisdiction
within Spokane County, Washington.
16. All Writings Contained Herein. This Agreement contains all the terms and conditions
agreed upon by the parties. No other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject
matter of this Agreement shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the Parties.
17. Administration. No new or separate legal or administrative entity is created to administer
the provisions of this Agreement.
18. Agreement To Be Filed. The Participating Agencies shall file this agreement with its
Participating Agencies Clerk. The County shall file this agreement with the County Auditor.
19. Non-Waiver. No waiver by any the Parties of any of the terms of this Agreement shall be
construed as a waiver of the same or other rights of that party in the future.
20.Headings. Headings are inserted for convenience of reference only and are not to be deemed
part of or to be used in construing this Agreement.
21. Compliance With Laws. The Parties shall observe all federal, state and local laws,
ordinances and regulations, to the extent that they may be applicable to the terms of this
Agreement.
22. Relationship Of The Parties. The Parties intend that an independent contractor relationship
will be created by this Agreement. The Participating Agencies are interested only in the results
that could be achieved, and the conduct and control of all services will be solely with the County.
No agent, employee, servant or otherwise of the County shall be deemed to be an employee,
agent, servant, or otherwise of the Participating Agencies for any purpose, and the employees of
the County are not entitled to any of the benefits that the Participating Agencies provides for the
Participating Agencies' employees. The County will be solely and entirely responsible for its
acts and the acts of its agents, employees, servants, subcontractors or otherwise, during the
performance of this Agreement. The County does not have the power or authority to bind the
Participating Agencies in any promise, agreement, or representation other than specifically
provided for in this Agreement.
23. Enforcement Costs. If any legal action or other proceeding is brought for the enforcement of
this Agreement, or because of an alleged dispute, breach, default or misrepresentation in
connection with any provisions of this Agreement, the successful or prevailing party or parties
shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorney's fees, court costs, and all expenses (including
taxes) even if not taxable as court costs (including, without limitation, all such fees, costs, and
expenses incident to appeals), incurred in that action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief
to which such party or parties may be entitled.
24. Maintenance Of Records. The Parties will maintain, for at least three (3) years after
completion of this agreement, all relevant records pertaining to the agreement. The Parties shall
make available to other Parties, or the Washington State Auditor, or their duly authorized
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT--6
representatives, at any time during their normal operating hours, all records, books or pertinent
information which the Parties shall have kept in conjunction with this Agreement, and which the
Parties may be required by law to include or make part of its auditing procedures, an audit trail,
or which may be required for the purpose of funding the services contracted for herein.
25. Remedies. No remedy herein conferred upon the Parties is intended to be exclusive of any
other remedy, and each and every such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to
every other remedy given hereunder or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute
or otherwise. No single or partial exercise by any Party of any right, power, or remedy hereunder
shall preclude any other or further exercise thereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Interlocal Agreement to be
executed on the date and year opposite their respective signatures.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT--7
SPOKANE COUNTY:
- ! /57/ z313
Date
Title
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT--S
CITY OF SPOKANE:
Mayor Date
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT--9
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY:
City Manager Date
[NTERLOCAL AGREEMENT--10
SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT:
Date
Title
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT--I I
SPOKANE REGIONAL FRANSPORTATIO i COUNCIL:
Date
Title
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT--12
ADDENDUM A
rte a ri Amendment NG,
>:rr Contract N .2044ESL6108Z
E YL Nit Yqx Si.Rwi a 3;GA 92J'-I'C!'USA•TEL G,:o-73 @ 3•F?.3S aos..sa.sas
This Amendment No 7 is entered into by AAnd bet+yeei Spokti nu Cvu:tl;,Washington(hereinailer refttretl to
"County")and Envirtrnmental Sy'skms Resertrch Institute,Inc.(here:n tier reiened to as'Zvi").
*I-1 lx @A5,Esri and County entered Into an Enterprise License Agreement affective December' °'1,2IT14 and
,At irnndments 2,4 and 5 extended the terra until December 3 I w,21]12("Agreement");a d
WHEREAS.the parties desire to amend the Enterprise License Terms and Condition oFthe Agrsorrieur In(1)update
applicable appendices and(=i)extend Lie term until Deccmbc-3 l",2015{"Renewal Tern")for an additional seven hundred
and eleven thousand dollars(S711,000),
NOW THEREFORE,life pnrries agree to the fallowing:
1. EN tend the rerun°Rhis Agreement from Janl`ary l',2013 until December 3I",2171.6 unless terminated earlier es
provided in Article 7—Team.Termination,o.nd Expiration("Renewal Term').
2. Amend Appendix E Software aiid Deployment Schedule with the attached Renewal Term Appendix B SpR•stte and
Deployment Schedule,which shall supersede find apply deririg the Renewal Term.
3, Amend Appendix ELA Fee Schedule with the tattnoLmd Renewal Term Appendix C ELA Fee Schedule:,which shall
supersede and apply during[Ire ReneweI Term,
4. Amend Appendix D County Annual Deployment P.epatt with the attached Rooewal Term Appendix D County Annual
Deployment Report,which shall supersede and apply during the Renewal Term
Except as may spec i''bal ly m adifiiee by this Am tied ment N .7,n I l Drier teams.and eonditinn s Qtthe Agreement and
any Amend ntent(s)or Addendum(s)cpglgt'itu',u the enure agre;rtieet between the parties and supersede all prior and
contemporaneous sgretx rtents nr represerttarisns,urines or oral,nonecrn i n g the snbjncL mm ter of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have exneuied this Amendment N .7 Its of the date c.F the but party to sign
below.
ACCEPTED AND AGREED.
SPOKANE COUNTY.WYASIlIt.QTON ENVIRO T° SYSTEMS
(County) RESEA' .H I E.
(EsriJ
Printed lame; WILL IA i 1 r t i f3 C Printed Name. "' +..rnre.,Jpt9[Igpri
" 1 aatneetitsCO Iels
Title: t'rro-nen l4 k 1$ Vee&kid. title:
U>e; P Z —1 l L Date: 1.f-
2004ES1..6O82fTJ13 Amendment 7 'aE1 I 44 [240.01
INTERLGGAL AGREEMENT-13
ADDENDUM A Cont.
RENEWAL TERM APPE fD.IX B
SOFTWARE AND DEPLCIYMEr T SCHEDULE
County may Deploy the Fmerprise Lioenrse Software up lo the Dalai quan lily of'!"scenes indicared belyr,4(n-1ng the k -ek al
'rams adds ELA.
Table A-I
Enterprise Litenee Sartre:r—Fin li raised QLLSstride--
I Item - Total(N}'.fSeats
tss Be Deployed i
[Broils for Desktop SDPtware(Single List or Coneurreur Use)
13asiti{ArrVie s}.Slar,dnd{1r.f:ditur} a,d Adkancrd{Arc;nro) jrrn7mif
Argils h r Desktop p:Alsasiun 541-lrrarr(Single Use or Concurrent VulD) _.
Spatial Analyst,317 Anal}'s.Geastat stieal Analyst,Network Analyst,Publisher,S:hernatics, arfryrnired
Wcrkftiow Manager,and Data Reviewer
A reGIS far Server Softwar
Arci I S Server Worlhgronpr and A rtG IS Server Enterprise urvlfmilad
ArcGIS for Server Esseacsiaea _ J
Image Extension,Spatial Analyst,3D Analyst,artd Network Analyst /rrodfmiietf
ArcCl-S Engine nroflmrfed
Ara GIS Eaylizt Extensions
3D Analyst.Spatial Analyst.Lieadatbbaae Update,Fsetwork.iknalpst.and Schematics I 7rrrFlmtfad
ArcC I S Runtime S fondant rariOn Eros'
AreGIS Ito rt[m0 EafeaFIVei(Sink t )
31]Analyst.Spatial Analyst.Network Analyse nrrfimr'red
Table A-2
Fnlerprtte License Soll re--Li mitedQnantities
Rolled-In Qt y. QV.Seers
Item (Inapplicable) ID Be Deployed Toed
Beni Developer Network(EDN)Staedr:d aetnuai subscrIptIons - 9 i 4
is
.,*� MIA Intcraperalil1ly r7rtikrnp Ertensitm(3 year Term Licenses] - 2
3 Eitiflopping&C:°rarting;EarlPrndLLttionMaming 3 3
—
s
J Esri CityEngire Advensnd Conan-rani Use - 2 2
I�Ar Pad 17 12
Product Nurrrber Dr Skittle rlrtiuns Named Users per Subscription Annual C red lrs perS0bsrripltrn I
ArcGS5(Aline Subserllatkrrt 2 SO IO;JQG -
EsrI Virtu!Campus r - I2,0011
Piy 01'4
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT--11
ADDENDUM A Cont.
RENEWAL TERM APPENDIX C
ELA FEE SCHEDULE
The ELA Fee is$711,000.The ELA Fee is in consideration of the Enterprise License Software,ELA Maintenance,Esri
Developer Conference registrations and Esri International User Conference registrations.
January 1",2013 to January 1",2014 to January 1",2015 to ELA Fee
December 31",2013 December 31",2014 December 31",2015
Payments $230,000 $237,000 $244,000 • $711,000
Optional Year(to be mutually agreed to by amendment):
January 1",2016 to
December 31",2016
Payments $251,000
Number of Esri International User
Conference Registrations per Year 8
Number of Esri Developer Conference
per Year 2
Number of Tier 2 Support Callers 8
Sets of Back-up Media(upon request) 2
Renewal Term of ELA through December 31",2015
Page 3 of 4
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT--15
ADDENDUM A Cont.
. .
Ali I'
v _ s
I
Iril
a a
a c-
p tv t Ia'1 -
xix $ ma 4
E z
e
t
E' .] r
- m 04
z g4
z L 3
C
A
W
Y
I%
ix
0 2 '
4' E.z 5• r7 I +3
a y
l I
' i
IN4TERLOCAL ACREEh1EINT--1ii
ADDENDUM B
ELGIBLE AGENCY STAFF WHO MAY CONTACT ESRI'S TECHNICAL SUPPORT
GROUP DIRECTLY
SPOKANE COUNTY
ESRI Eligible Agency Authorized
CuKornerii Name Ind:ividJal Phone Number Expertise Email Address
SPOKANE rnatewart !spuleanes;ounty
6505 COUNTY lvI]KE STEWARt (509)477-7253 Database r dm'n&SDE [g
51'OL4NE CiFS Transportation- nmtewarbasoOklulgeNariD
550+ COUNTY DAVE RIDEOUT (509)477-7251 Engineering apps, Ig
GIS 11 1cb Services.GM
SPOKANE Analysis&Cadastra.l
19292 COUNTY SHAWNsA ERNST (509)477-7531 AP Ps. serru kalico ntv..ura
SPOKANE_ DARCY GIS Web Services (lhath.gEO,g5.u rt cx�utuIL,
6505 COUJ\'1'Y ERIC AWAY (509)4774142 ntg,
CITY OF SPOKANE
ES RI Eligible Agency
Custom- r Nance Authorizedlndividual Phone Number E .ertise Email Address
CITY OF MIKE SMITH (509)625-6457 GIS l:til:tics i3hrESrnithr;SpekartcCiri.or
6712 SPOKANE
CITY OF BILL P6WERS (504)625-6418 Database Admin&SC G bmyers@spakaneeity.org
6743 SRN<ANL
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Under contract NV Spokane County ISD-CIS. All ESRI Technical Support will be initiated by
Spokane County ISD-01S
SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT
ESRI Eligible Agency Authorized
Custom ell Name Individual Phan Number Expertise Email Address
SPOKANE
RCCICNAL MARK SPRINGER (509)224-1448 G .Sr Epidemktogy 13152/' ` anecStu}3r
HEALTH ,Arg
14423 DISTRICT
SPOKANE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COUNCIL
ESRI Eligible Agency A.ithnriad Customer Name Ind vi dual Phone Number Expertise Email Address
SPOKANE
REGIONAL Kevin Shipman (544)343-6385 G15&Transportation kshipman&�:s
TRANSFORTATI Planning
110540 ON DISTRICT.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT--11
ADDENDUM C
EXAMPLE; ESRI 2013 ELF,Montlily Cost Allo('Alion Splits for Eligible Agencier.
'Itemization of ESRI
ELF.Site Lift.liSe Fee
ESRS EI I!elpot.e Stu Itceme 5 230.00D 00
Taxi S 1936:60
ESP.]21.0...?mxe 5 ?49.:S5 60
Tatr1ES IE7.,LFri S *_44;83..60
TM EGRI ELA Fee ss•-{.nuray Fee. 5 361."0:60
~.�1CI
MontIJr Erarired
Iteinizatioii of County kFatnrretreaee Cn ul Ca tint. (gunk,Adaoin C nunn;-Indirect Total fiuum-,
Fees& Indirect C C15tS T 1, ae Fet1'C o-srs Frr C VA 1-9 Fir
Sleeking.COMM. S 49,150 00 11 3?sa S a.laD.14 S 9:060 r S ',31-°-Q-0 S i 1_3!"-60
C1V.of Spa auc 5 S0.654.0 0 '•6.•74°. 5 6,913 2R
R TC 5 3.%0+1.00 :45`4 S 302 27
SpckmecctloySiesiEli hate S 1700.40 i.19°d S 144.82
}peht11 valley S 790D.toe 5.55.7 $ 6s22
14:..5 ran 10 0.AtSta 5 5:,1..".40
Itemization By Agency lr'R1
of ESRI FLA Fee& 3so-rirl,
Meineenenst Input EBRI ELA trice Esi t EL5, E,nrerprke Fro-ratrd ESR.t CE A Sr
County Adiniil.Fee Tow., vp Allocasiott 5plfrt In crem Mann Cotten-}1.4 CoentyFeet
-pckaar CoiLerr S 1C3 3e0.00 /2 42`4 5 1:43573-4 5 1313,734.97 I 27:4;4.97 5 4„40.44 $ 134,973,41
!Cuso.5pAav,e S :0.-050.04 40 93q• 5 04.1345 01. S 102.065..4{6 1 '_1.413.45 S 6.965.10 I 109.014 66
SRTC 5 a-5170 00 1.7S..`. S 3 CRS 5 S 4 AN S.4 S 9N '5 3117 71 S i_74.1.S”
hpatprl.CauufF Tirallk 1):ono S 1 700 4ta OAP* S 1.9E4.27 S ?,13!.5C 5 455,50 5 146 53 S 2%298.31
5pDkar0.-nE r 5 ".K00N0 401'4 S 5.221.01 S LOPS S 2.098 12 5 682 27 S 10,680.39'
5
1$7.4/.513 go ultimo*?* 5 130,6[9.00 S 3493$3.60 s {',313.5o S 1:33'.00 S 151.720,60
.I hese table values change month to month based upon the number of software licenses
requested by the Participating Agencies.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT-w1$
ADDENDUM C CONT.
EXAMPLE: ESRI Nil ELA Monthly Cost AiloeaNiou Splits for Eligible Agencies,
Itemization of ESRI
ELA:sire License Fee
ESRI LL:rerov*t 5,6)Etc ease $ r+ it
Two
ES?"ELA w ram-, S
TOW E aiii ELA Et., S :56,492.60
TotaI ESRI ILA F,re
371.1 t5{{J --.
Ireirrivirion of Coniori ]taetllrl; F. i•,trd
1l�r�temn9rfe lepur
C nuts° C Adurirt Camdt5-lmrlirerr TOM'IOPelra'
Fars Totals oq Fers C'v;n Fre Cost f9-191a1 Ertl°"Cosa
SpolcekrCaa°er, S 4P.1.0000 i4.371i S !.'r1719 5 e.00(1.0D S 7,F50.10 5 1:1,560.0
City QC 5 0.000 i5.66ov $ +C121.21
SS}T[ 5 3,H10 Cu '_45,k 1 307:7.1
Spokane{euat3'HPMlt1i blarl:ce 5 4.70000 t ;?s< S 149.43
Spo.kaimr441.1ey 5 7.900.1.10 5 5+?'c S 04 62
5 14,85100 1.00 004. 4 .1:.664.}01
Iteanl7:ntitm B,-Argeurj' 2014 E$RI
limn<Ir[}
of ESRI ELA Fee :
%'�ni /�, } r5 FOR �I nlnlvu�rree lapac E5°173 EI.ABece E5R1'iE1.� E ate'prise P7'et'nsed E"SRI�X.Fe
4 ouuP'.�L Iniii,FOR Tatra.; ud, klloratioa ,lu15 leu•r east AMIlolirn ComOf1-rPEI C'C°llmrr Flt%
6prkameCouny S 101300.00 32.429- S 1?a.243Ol S 1;4--23-35 5 _i.7'_3B` 5 1.31;-19 S 7r1-05
City ofSpokaur 5 50,6}0.6} 4O Pj i 5 9-.901.01 s 105.153 It f 24.533 75 $ '-09L:7 I __ ?
56CTC $ 3.S44•30 I.'ft, 5 a°*49 50 $ 4.564.79 $ I C44.14 5 W.7.1 c
Spatisie Colley-Helt IDsgncr $ I.100.00 ISSN S 2.44466 s '-`1 14 b 517-14 S 34441 5 2.364-61
SpoLuu\Wel'' 3 7.544 00 4°0I°r 5 9.50165 $ 10.:03 1i 5 2.40J,13 5 6+94.6= 5 10.99T.90
S I.p7,' 0.33 100.00,$ $ 0?,94000 5 :34.99 L011 S ;T.,64:,60 5 1..{6030 S 26915:1,90 I
These table values change month to month based upon the number of software licenses
requested by the Participating Agencies.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT--19
ADDENDUM C CONT.
EXA MFLE: ESRI 2(U 5 LEA ►Ioiit 1 Cost Allocation Splits for Eligible Agencies
Itemization of ESRI ELA
Site License Fee
EU.1Eule.wise.SiteLweace c 241,4-00.4G
taxi
SRI ELi w u:es 5 26-1 601.60
Twill FaR1ELiTee S !61.601.60
ToenI€SIlf Igo eh,t !ir Frei S 1773S1-20
ATP- KL
ltmuhh- Rrorarrd
Itemization ofComity Atarnetnnne4input 611110 CM11.17 AtraiZ Com-Ir`'Ali to T;4 ra1Cannr'°
Fees &Indirect Costs Trtnls ax Eets'two Yee €510,19*bl FervCtsts
$p*Nuf austr 1 -IP:CP05 4.i19a 5 4,39:P4 5 ¢004N, S 7,"53.6 5 12,733,0
Civi d CSpoaar.4 S SO 6:0 06 36.46% S 7.217.34
59.7t $ 3 50000 '..1770 S ?13.:1
5poknsrCouallHsnlhLAirlsl 4 1760.0 L.1gei f 1f2.13
Spam*Vale- S '94000 5.3301 5 706¢7
S 1uI1;Q.OP IP4.P4 i S5,743 40
Itemization By Agetic:t of :416 ESR3
]Lamhty
ESRI ELA.Felt& Count;' St,I17ee#n5.eby. 85174 Ei._-1 Elm s. ESRIEL.; En103p111, ?scared E:2E1.445
Admin.Fee Tninii r4:0 311rrntfan Splits InrreaseAmmar Ces wry Faes Cmat!: res
Spc's a C'mwrr S 103.200,10 5:.6315 S 127.952 71 5 In 712-71 5 35,11.'1 S x 393 54 5 143.06 6B
L'i4v eoF 5pokaue 5 8p,450.10 10-534e 5 79-$56.€I2 S 105.7,5//4 5 27.64:' $ .31+.34 $ 115,51533
01ST[ 5 3.5P}.70 1.7540 $ 4.33393 $ 4.694-83 S 1.149.55 S 313 21 S 5.315.06
apckaue Coomy Remit Laing S "0}.50 0 36aQ i 7.$00.03 S ?S'7$ S 582'S 5 i5_.]? 5 2.330.4'_
SpoL.aoe':-alle^: 5 '+,900. 0 4.Pl.n 5 a.752?4 S LO.50813 S 2.70.33 $ +06.9: S 11,515.30
$ iS' .A57.PP $30•[Oe4 264.401.0 S 67.F.N.64 S 12.183.60 5 277.38a•34
These table values change month to month based upon the number of software licenses
requested by the Participating Agencies.
UNTERLOCAL AGREEMENT-20
ADDENDUM C GLINT,
EXAMPLE:ESRI 2016 ELA Monthly C'O!et Allocation Splits for Eligible Ageueieft
Itemization of ESRI ELA
Site Liceu.e Fee
1s5P3 iiiely.a.e aiie L7C0PSI1 S 211.9 a9 0a
Trxe. 3 21.219 63
Eat Eth•raxel S 272,210d5
To-1ml ESRI ELA Fee 5 60
Taint E',RI ELA Fre x.,Caasrti Fie? 5 21:1`.517
:1r10 Laid
Itemization of CRtuity 't49Y11i1�T� Pia,'elea
"afninrsriaieceleg�F C4unT a.LinrrAdmi < iiir !ndir•ri Tatn1e:uann"
roes sit I11dt1'ers 'ostS. Tamil o1 rrr.,Coxc Frr Cage](1.19foo Fees LI•.ri
Sprkriie Conan. S 317;100.00 34.37?e 5 1.470. 0 5 x.040 00 5 3.0090 5 11.00650
CLtyrfS ekteaf $ PO, Ip• ;6.46°4 S 7.341,41
&flit• S 1100.00 '_i'!. 5 51$8$
511sta (tansy Hesl7nLislhcr t 1.1`00.0$ l.:Zi. 5 134,79
SpokaueValler S 7,900,94 -53e4 5 '19,.2
S 141850.09 109,CO 71 5 13.004.90
IteIllizntiolt By 4Qu1cV Of :i16ESEI
p x14>ar1Lh.
ESR1 EL-51 Fee Lei C'uuni3 Hair eusxrr Iiiptei !SRI ELA 3ns ESRIELA Enrerprhe Yrni nrtel ES&3 E1?i Sr
A1iinin.Fee Torah e4 tisertIo,n Splif, lnrevn AmovIlI [coah•Fers C Fees
Syakaw 6 aua S 10.1 iln1xi 3!'1°e S 134,5-D?33 S 142.'111.5.' 4 30.401,6: $ 4,4'0.74 S 447-1+14
C'rh-al'Spvtame S 94.850.09 F3°s 5 102.13;03 5 11!.41_'6 S 37°'6_',26 $ ;333_sE 5 115755.6"
SRTC ?r 3.50090 t'&°z $ 4.456 26 $ 4.83500 5 1.333,00 5 11368 f, 5.653.64
Spokane Ccsaeh Hen.bh Ebr°trrei S I.'OD 1311 860., S :.1,55.4-1 5 2.348 1. S C.48.=3 S 154.79 5 2.503_22
Spa6anetial1n. S 90100 401', c 10.061'S; S 10.915119 S S S 7.1431' S 631.1i1
5 1971}fO.]l 1011,:14°s S :=1.940,40 5 . :,.10,69 c '5.140.0 5 13.106.911 S 155317250
These table values change month to month based upon the number of software licenses
requested by the Participating Agencies.
INTERLtCAL AGREEMENT-21
ADDENDUM I]
ELOIBLE AGENCY AUTHORIZED INDIVIDUALS
FOR SOFTWARE REQUESTS
(The following individuals have budget authority within their agency to make requests to Spokane
County ISD-Cr1S for ESRI software covered by the ESRI ELA)
CITY OF SPOKANE
ESRR1
Customer* Eligrbie Agency same Authorized Individual Phone Number Email Address
1742 CITY OT 5POF A\E C#[LL MYER_S 1569)G25.6412 bmL'ers.„?Ispol:ane.zit}'.urg
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
ESRI
Cos-Lomeli' Eligible Agene>Dame A.ithorsacd lndi';idual Phrvre Number Email Address
CITY OF SPOKANE MORGAN (509)720.5I04
V",ALLE'r KD11rILKFL nikoudell aar�ir., _rs_ iilpr
SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT
ESRI
Custurner4 Eligible Ageney Name Authorized Indiv ddual Phut Number I Email Address
SPCI.&INF R EC,fa Al_
14423 FIEALTH DISTRICT MARK SPRINGER 00)324-1442 48 rraspriager(Ospu4rana;rwnty_urg
SPOKANE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COUNCIL
ESRI
Customer* Eligible Agerwy Name Autlrorized Individual Phone Number Email Address
SPOKANE REGIONAL
TRANSPORTATION
40540 DISTRICT KEVIN WAI,.L ,CE {509)343-6370 5 tiw u nc ,r
Il`VTERLOCAL AGREEMENT-22
ADDENDUM E
MPA PRICELIST
E407-4Q12
Section Description Price
1 ArcGIS for Desktop Concurrent Use Licenses Maintenance
Primary Maintenance for ArcGIS for Desktop Advanced Concurrent Use License(primary 1st,11th,21st,31st...) $3,000.00
Secondary Maintenance for ArcGIS for Desktop Advanced Concurrent Use U cense(secondary 2-10,12-20...) $1,200.00
Primary Maintenance for ArcGIS for Desktop Standard Concurrent Use License $1,500.00
Secondary Maintenance for ArcGIS for Desktop Standard Concurrent Use License $1,200.00
Primary Maintenance for ArcGIS for Desktop Basic Concurrent Use License $700.00
Secondary Maintenance for ArcGIS for Desktop Basic Concurrent Use License $500.00
1 ArcGIS Extensions for Desktop Concurrent Use Licenses Maintenance
Primary Maintenance for ArcGIS Spatial Analyst for Desktop Concurrent Use License $500.00
Secondary Maintenance for ArcGIS Spatial Ana lyst for Desktop Concurrent Use License $200.00
Primary Maintenance for ArcGIS 3D Analyst for Desktop Concurrent Use License $500.00
Secondary Maintenance for ArcGIS 3D Analyst for Desktop Concurrent Use License $200.00
Primary Maintenance for ArcGIS Geostatistical Analystfor Desktop Concurrent Use License $500.00
Secondary Maintenance for ArcGIS Geostatistica I Analyst for Desktop Concurrent Use License $200.00
Primary Maintenance for ArcGIS Publisher for Desktop Concurrent Use License $500.00
Secondary Maintenance for ArcGIS Publisher for Desktop Concurrent Use License $2D0.00
Primary Maintenance for ArcGIS Tracking Ana lystfor Desktop Concurrent Use License $500.00
Secondary Maintenance for ArcGIS Tracking Analyst for Desktop Concurrent Use License $200.00
Primary Maintenance for ArcGIS Data Interoperability for Desktop Concurrent Use License $500.00
Secondary Maintenance for ArcGIS Data I nteroperabil ity for Desktop Concurrent Use License $200.00
Primary Maintena nce for ArcGIS Network Analyst for Desktop Concurrent Use License $500.00
Secondary Maintenance for ArcGIS Network Analyst for Desktop Concurrent Use License $200.00
Primary Maintenance for ArcGIS Schematics for Desktop Concurrent Use License $500.00
Secondary Maintena nce for ArcGIS Schematics for Desktop Concurrent Use License $200.00
Primary Maintenance for ArcGIS Workflow Manager for Desktop Concurrent Use License $500.00
Secondary Maintenance for ArcGIS Workflow Manager for Desktop Concurrent Use License $200.00
Primary Maintenance for ArcGIS Data Reviewer for Desktop Concurrent Use License $500.00
Secondary Maintenance for ArcGIS Data Reviewer for Desktop Concurrent Use License $200.D0
1 ArcGlS for Desktop Single Use Licenses Maintenance
Primary Maintenance for ArcGIS for Desktop Advanced Single Use License(core only) $3,000.00
Secondary Maintenance for ArcGIS for Desktop Advanced Single Use License(core only) $1,200.00
Primary Maintenance for ArcGIS for Desktop Standard Single Use License(without extensions) $1,500.00
Secondary Maintenance for ArcGIS for Desktop Standard Single Use License(without extensions) $1,200.00
Primary Maintenance for ArcGlS for Desktop Standard Single Use License(with extensions) $2,100.00
Secondary Maintenance for ArcGIS for Desktop Standard Single Use License(with extensions) $1,800.09
Primary Maintenance for ArcGIS for Desktop Basic Single Use License(core only) $400.00
Secondary Maintenance for ArcGIS for Desktop Basic Single Use License(core only) $300.00
Primary Maintenance for ArcGIS for Desktop Basic Single Use License(core plus extensions) $1,000.00
Secondary Maintenance for ArcGIS for Desktop Basic Single Use License(core plus extensions) $900.00
1 ArcGIS Extensions for Desktop Advanced Single Use Licenses Maintenance
Primary Maintenance for ArcGIS Spatial Analyst for Desktop Advanced Single Use License $500.00
Secondary Maintenance for ArcGIS Spatial Analystfor Desktop Advanced Single Use License $200.00
Primary Maintenance for ArcGIS Geostatistical Analystfor Desktop Advanced Single Use License $500.00
Secondary Maintenance for ArcGIS Geostati sti ca I Analyst for Desktop Adva need Single Use License $200.00
Primary Maintenance for ArcGIS Network Analystfor Desktop Advanced Single Use License $500.00
Secondary Maintenance for ArcGIS Network Analyst for Desktop Advanced Single Use License $200.00
Primary Maintena nce for ArcGIS 3D Analyst for Desktop Advanced Single Use License $500.00
Secondary Maintenance for ArcGIS 3D Analystfor Desktop Advanced Single Use License $200.00
Primary Maintenance for ArcGIS Tracking Analyst for Desktop Advanced Single Use License $500.00
Secondary Mai ntenance for ArcGIS Tracking Analystfor Desktop Advanced Single Use License $200.00
Primary Maintenance for ArcGIS Publisher for Desktop Advanced Single Use License $500.00
Secondary Maintenance for ArcGIS Publisher for Desktop Advanced Single Use License $200.00
Primary Maintenance for ArcGIS Schematics for Desktop Advanced Single Use License $500.00
Secondary Maintena nce for ArcGIS Schematics for Desktop Advanced Single Use License $200.00
Primary Maintenance for ArcGIS Data I nteropera bil ity for Desktop Advanced Single Use License $500.00
Secondary Maintenance for ArcGIS Data Interoperabil ity for Desktop Advanced Single Use License $200.00
Primary Maintenance for ArcGIS Data Reviewer for Desktop Advanced Single Use License $500.D0
Secondary Maintenance for ArcGIS Data Reviewer for Desktop Advanced Single Use License $200.00
Primary Maintenance forArcGlS Workflow Manager for Desktop Advanced Single Use License $500.00
Secondary Maintenance for ArcGIS Workflow Manager for Desktop Advanced Single Use License $200.00
Annual Maintenance for Esri Roads and Highways for Desktop Concurrent Use License $2,500.00
ADDENDUM E Cont.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT--23
3 Esri CityEngine
Primary Maintenancefor Esri CityEngine Advanced Concurrent Use License $800.00
Secondary Maintenance for Esri CityEngine Advanced Concurrent Use License $675.00
Primary Maintenance for Esri CityEngine Advanced Single Use License $800.00
Secondary Maintenance for Esri CityEngine Advanced Single Use License $675.00
Primary Maintenance for Esri CityEngine Basic Single Use License $100.00
Secondary Maintenance for Esri CityEngine Basic Single Use License $85.00
4 ArcGIS Engine Licenses
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS Engine Single Use License(without extensions) $100.00
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS Engine Single Use License(with one or more extensions) $400.00
Primary Maintenance for ArcGIS Engine Concurrent Use License $250.00
Secondary Maintenance for ArcGIS Engine Concurrent Use License $185.00
4 ArcGIS Extensions for Engine Maintenance
Primary Maintenance for ArcGIS 30 Analystfor Engine.Concurrent Use License $200.00
Secondary Maintenance for ArcGIS 3D Analyst for Engine Concurrent Use License $150.00
Primary Maintenancefor ArcGIS Spatial Analyst for Engine Concurrent Use License $200.00
Secondary Maintenance for ArcGIS Spatial Analystfor Engine Concurrent Use License $150.00
Primary Mai ntenance for ArcGIS Engine Geodata base Update Concurrent Use License $200.00
Secondary Maintenancefor ArcGIS Engine Geodatabase Update Concurrent Use License $150.00
Pri mary Maintenancefor ArcGIS Schematics far Engine Concurrent Use License $200.00
Secondary Maintenance for ArcGIS Schematics for Engine Concurrent Use License $150.00
Primary Mai ntena nce for ArcGIS Network Analyst for Engine Concurrent Use License $200.00
Secondary Maintenancefor ArcGIS Network Analystfor Engine Concurrent Use License $150.00
Primary Maintenancefor ArcGIS Tracking Analyst for Engine Concurrent Use License $200.00
Secondary Maintenancefor ArcGIS Tracking Analystfor Engine Concurrent Use License $150.00
Primary Maintenancefor ArcGIS Data Interoperebility for Engine Concurrent Use License $200.00
Secondary Maintenancefor ArcGIS Data Interoperabi lity for Engine Concurrent Use License $150.00
4 ArcGIS Runtime
Annual Maintenancefor ArcGIS Runtime Standard 25-Pack Single Use Deployment License $1,000.00
4 ArcGIS Extensions for ArcGIS Runtime
Annual Mel ntene ncefor ArcGIS 3D Analyst for RuntimeStandard 25-Pack Single Use Deployment License $2,000.00
Annual Mci ntena ncefor AroGIS Network Analystfor Ruritime Standard 25-Pack Single Use Deployment License $2,000.00
Annual Maintena nee for ArcGIS Spatial Analystfor Runtime Standard 25-Pack Single Use Deployment License $2,000.00
5 ArcGIS for Server Enterprise
5 ArcGIS for Server Enterprise Advanced
Annual Maintenancefor ArcGIS for Server Enterprise Advanced(up to four cores) $10,000.00
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS for Server Enterprise Advanced(additional cores) $2,500.00
5 ArcGIS for Server Enterprise Standard
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS for Server Enterprise Standard(up to four cores) $5,000.00
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS for Server Enterprise Standard(additional cores) $1,250.00
5 ArcGLS for Server Enterprise Basic
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS for Server Enterprise Basic(up to four cores) $3,000.00
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS far Server Enterprise Basic(additional cores) $750.00
5 ArcGIS for Server Workgroup Advanced
Annual Mai ntenance for ArcGIS for Server Workgroup Advanced(up to two cores) $2,500.00
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS far Server Workgroup Advanced(additional cores-maximum four cores per server) $1,250.00
5 ArcGIS for Server Workgroup Standard
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS for Server Workgroup Standard(up to two cores) $1,250.00
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS for Server Workgroup Standard(additional cores-maximum four cores per server) $625.00
5 ArcGIS for Server Workgroup Basic
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS for Server Workgroup Basi c-(price per server[core pricing does not applyl-minin $1,250.00
5 ArcGIS Extensions for Server Enterprise Advanced
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS Data I nteroperability for Server Enterprise Advanced(up to four cores) $2,500.00
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS Data I nteroperability for Server Enterprise Advanced(additional cores) $625.00
Annual Maintenance for ArcGls Image Extension for Server Enterprise Advanced(up to four cores) $2,500.00
Annual Maintenance for ArcGlS Image Extension for Server Enterprise Advanced(additional cores) $625.00
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS Workflow Manager for Server Enterprise Advanced(up to four cores) $2,500.00
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS Workflow Manager for Server Enterprise Advanced(additional cores) $625.00
Annual Maintenancefor Data Reviewer for Server Enterprise Advanced(up to four cores) $2,500.00
Annual Maintenancefor Data Reviewer for Server Enterprise Advanced(additional cores) $625.00
Annual Maintenancefor Esri Roads and Highways for Server Enterprise Advanced(up to four cores) $2,500.00
Annual Maintenancefor Esri Roads and Highways for Server Enterprise Advanced(additional cares) $625.00
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT--24
ADDENDUM E Cont.
5 ArcGIS Extensions for Server Enterprise Standard
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS Data I nteropera bil ity for Server Enterprise Standard(up to four cores) $2,500.00
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS Data I nteropera bil ity for Server Enterprise Standard(additional cores) $625.00
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS Workflow Ma nager for Server Enterprise Standard(up to four cores) $2,500.00
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS Workflow Ma nager for Server Enterprise Ste ndard(additional cores) $625.00
Annua I Maintenance for ArcGIS Network Analyst for Server EnterpriseStandard(up to four cores) $2,500.00
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS Network Analyst for Server Enterprise Standard(additional cores) $625.00
Annual Maintenance for ArcGlS Image Extension for Server Enterprise Standard(up to four cores) $2,500.00
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS Image Extension for Server Enterprise Standard(a dditiona I cores) $625.00
Annual Maintenance for ArcGlS Data Reviewer for Server Enterprise Standard(up to four cores) $2,500.00
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS Data Reviewer for Server EnterpriseStandard(additional cores) $625.00
Annual Maintenance for Esri Roads and Highways for Server EnterpriseStandard(up to four cores) $2,500.00
Annual Maintenance for Esri Roads and Highways for Server EnterpriseStandard(additional cores) $625.00
5 ArcGIS Extensions for Server Workgroup Advanced
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS Data lnteroperebility for Server Workgroup Advanced(maximum four cores)License $1,250.00
Annual Ma intena nce for ArcGIS Workflow Manager for Server Workgroup Advanced(maximum four cores)License $1,250.00
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS Image Extension for Server Workgroup Advanced(maximum four cores)License $1,250.00
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS Data Reviewer for Server Workgroup Advanced(maximum four cores)License $1,250.00
Annual Maintenance for Esri Roads and Highways for Server Workgroup Advanced(maximum four cores)License $1,250.00
5 ArcGIS Extensions for Server Workgroup Standard
Annual Ma i ntenance for ArcGIS Data Interopera bilitf for Server Workgroup Ste ndard(maximum four cores)License $1,250.00
Annual Mei ntena nce for ArcGIS Workflow Manager for Server Workgroup Standard(maximum four cores)License $1,250.00
Annual Ms i ntena nce for ArcGIS Network Analyst for Server Workgroup Standard(maximum four cores)License $1,250.00
Annual Maintenance for Image Extension for Server Workgroup Standard(maxi mum four cores)License $1,250.00
Annual Mai ntena nce for ArcGIS Data Revi ewer for Server Workgroup Standard(maximum four cores)License $1,250.00
Annual Maintenance for Esri Roads and Highways for Server Workgroup Standard(maximum four cores)License $1,250.00
5 ArcGIS for Server Enterprise Staging Server
5 ArcGIS for Server Enterprise Advanced Staging Server
Annual Maintenance far ArcGIS for Server Enterprise Advanced(up to four cores)Staging Server $5,000.00
Annual Maintenance far ArcGIS for Server Enterprise Advanced(additional cores)Stagi ng Server $1,250.00
5 ArcGIS for Server Enterprise Standard Staging Server
Annual Ma i ntena nce for ArcGIS for Server EnterpriseStandard(up to four cores)Staging Server $2,500.00
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS for Server Enterprise Sta ndard(additional cores)Staging Server $625.00
5 ArcGIS for Server Enterprise Basic Staging Server
Annua I Maintenance for ArcGIS for Server Enterprise Basic(up to four cores)Staging Server $1,500.00
Annua I Maintenance for ArcGIS for Server Enterprise Basic(additional cores)Staging Server $375.00
5 ArcGIS Extensions for Server Enterprise Staging Server
5 ArcGIS Extensions for Server Enterprise Advanced Staging Server
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS Data Interoperability for Server Enterprise Advanced(up to four cores)Staging Serve $1,250.00
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS Data Interoperabil ity for Server Enterprise Advanced(additional cares)Staging Sery $313.00
Annual Maintenance for ArcGlS Image Extension for Server Enterprise Advanced(up to four cores)Staging Server $1,250.00
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS Image Extension for Server Enterprise Advanced(additional cores)Staging Server $313.00
Annual Maintenance for ArcGlS Workfl ow Manager for Server Enterprise Advanced(up to four cores)Staging Server $1,250.00
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS Workflow Manager for Server Enterprise Advanced(additional cores)Staging Server $313.00
Annual Maintena nce for ArcGIS Data Reviewer for Server Enterprise Advanced(up to four cores)Staging Server $1,250.00
Annual Mai ntena nce for ArcGIS Data Reviewer for Server Enterprise Advanced(additional cores)Staging Server $313.00
Annual Maintenance for Earl Roads and Highways for Server Enterprise Advanced(up to four cores)Staging Server $1,250.00
Annual Maintenance for Earl Roads and Highways for Server Enterprise Advanced(additional cores)Staging Server $313.00
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT--25
ADDENDUM E Cont.
5 ArcGIS Extensions for Server Enterprise Standard Staging Server
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS Data Interoperability for Server Enterprise Standard(up to four cores)Staging Serve $1,250.00
Annual Ma intena nce for ArcG1S Data Interoperability for Server Enterprise Sta ndard(additional cores)Staging Servi $313.00
Annual Ma intena nce for ArcGIS Workflow Ma nager for Server Enterprise Standard(up to four cores)Staging Server $1,250.00
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS Workflow Manager for Server Enterprise Standard(additional cores)Staging Server $313.00
Annual Ma intenencefor ArcGlS Network Analyst for Server Enterprise Standard(up to four cores)Staging Server $1,250.00
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS Network Analyst for Server Enterprise Standard(a dditional cores)Staging Server $313.00
Annual Ma intena nce for ArcGIS Image Extension for Server Enterprise Standard(up to four cores)Staging Server $1,250.00
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS Image Extension for Server Enterprise Standard(additional cores)Staging Server $313.00
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS Data Reviewer for Server Enterprise Standard(up to four cores)Staging Server $1,250.00
Annual Maintenance for ArcGIS Data Reviewer for Server Enterprise Standard(additional cores)Staging Server $313.00
Annual Maintenance for Esri Roads and Highways for Server Enterprise Standard(up to four cores)Staging Server $1,250.00
Annual Maintenance for Esri Roads and Highways for Server Enterprise Standard(additional cores)Staging Server $313.00
12 Other Software
12 Esri Mapping and Charting
Annual Maintenance for Esri Production Mapping Concurrent Use License $2,500.00
Annual Maintenance for Esri Production Mapping Single Use License $2,500.00
13 Mobile GIS
13 ArcPad
Annual Maintenance for ArcPad Single Use License $250.00
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT--26
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: February 5, 2013 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ Consent ❑ Old business ❑ New business ❑ Public Hearing
❑ Information ®Admin. Report❑ Pending Legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2013 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) Docket
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: The Growth Management Act (GMA) RCW 36.70A.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: November 13, 2012, motion passed to approve 2013
Comprehensive Plan Docket.
BACKGROUND: The Growth Management Act (GMA) allows local jurisdictions to update
comprehensive plans no more than once each year. The City codified this process in Section
17.80.140 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC).
On November 13, 2012 City Council approved the 2013 Comprehensive Plan Docket. At this
point, staff is looking for direction from City Council on how to proceed with two items in the
adopted 2013 docket.
Split Land Use Designations (split zoning): The first item relates to the evaluation of the split
land use designations. The analysis for split land use designations identified eleven parcels with
split designations. There is a variety of options for mitigating the split designations aside from a
site-specific map amendment such as a boundary line adjustment, a subdivision, or to allow
appropriate use of both portions of the split property.
Another option would be to process a Code Text Amendment (CTA) that would provide
guidance to staff when these situations arise. A CTA would allow staff to work with the individual
property owners to determine the best solution on a project basis.
If City Council opts to process site-specific map amendment(s), notice will be required to all
property owners within 400 feet and each site must be posted with a public hearing notice.
Multifamily Zoning Locations: The second item on the docket relates to analyzing and
potentially modifying the City's land use map to ensure there are sufficient locations for
multifamily development. This analysis was based on the City's adopted comprehensive plan
and the policy direction for new multifamily development. The comprehensive plan states that
land appropriate for multifamily development should be located adjacent to the arterial street
system, served by public transit, and located in close proximity to business and commercial
centers.
Using a Geographical Information System (GIS), vacant and partially used land was identified
within existing zoning classifications that permit multifamily development. This data was
mapped (see attached maps) with arterials, grocery stores, and Spokane Transit Authority
(STA) bus routes to identify the proximity of existing multifamily parcels to essential services.
Page 1 of 2
The City currently has 3,160 acres of property that permits multifamily development. This
constitutes approximately 16% of the total land within the City. Out of the 3,160 acres currently
zoned multifamily, 573 acres are vacant and 131 acres are partially used (30,000 square feet or
greater). The results from the GIS analysis are located below:
Vacant multifamily zoned property
573 vacant parcels zoned multifamily
573 vacant acres zoned multifamily
1 acre is the average vacant acreage zoned multifamily
Vacant < 1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 7-8 8-9 9-10 10 >
Acreage
Number of 445 66 31 7 6 3 1 2 3 1 8
Parcels
Partially Used (PU) multifamily zoned property
120 partially used parcels zoned multifamily
131 partially used acres zoned multifamily
1 acre is the average partially used acreage zoned multifamily
PU < 1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 7-8 8-9 9-10 10 >
Acreage
Number of 63 49 5 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
Parcels
The analysis identifies that there are options for multifamily development through parcel
aggregation and on large vacant parcels. In addition, the analysis identifies that there are
opportunities for multifamily development in close proximity to transit and grocery stores. If
additional parcels are needed for multifamily development, the City has the ability to address
such needs through the annual comprehensive plan amendment process.
If City Council opts to designate new locations for multifamily development, notice will be
required to all property owners within 400 feet and each site must be posted with a public
hearing notice.
OPTIONS: Council discretion
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Council discretion
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A.
STAFF CONTACT: Mike Basinger, AICP, Senior Planner
Attachment(s): Designations that permit Multifamily map
Multifamily analysis maps
Split land use designations map
Page 2 of 2
r[, Department of Community Development
Planning Division
2013 Comprehensive Plan
Amendments
February 5, 2013
cirvH,,i.ic.
r[, Department of Community Development
Planning Division
Comprehensive Planning
The Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
(SVCP) lays out a vision for the future of
Spokane Valley during a 20-year period and
responds to the requirements of the Growth
Management Act (GMA)
2
cirvH,,i.ic.
r[, Department of Community Development
Planning Division
Docket Items for Discussion
• CPA-04- 13 : Reevaluate split land use
designations (split zoning) between McDonald
Road and Blake Road.
• CPA-OS - 13 : Analyze and potentially modify
Map 2 . 1 to ensure there are sufficient locations
for multifamily development.
3
CITYHAI I(.
Department of Community Development
Planning Division
Split Land Use Designations
Jpv
4
icoian Department of Community Development
., 1 Planning Division
Split Land Use Designations
5
icoian Department of Community Development
dolsoov 1 Planning Division
Split Land Use Designations
-
,
irr '-z•Z.h''
.:k.-,-.1-N..,..* :'
"~.-.4
, , .. . .
'''..1..4.%\%.",'
_
.;:,._
k--„:4: '-..."
%. ,-
,�•i .r +-
.
,r,.
, ,
.tom
A
,,,..„...
; Eta . , :
-
:ii„. .
MDR- 1
cirvH,,i.ic.
r[, Department of Community Development
s - Planning Division
Direction on Split Land Use (Zoning)
Options :
• Process a CTA for guidance on split zoning
• Process site-specific map amendments based
on City Council direction
— This option would require noticing
• 400 foot radius of parcel
• Posting of the site (4x4 sign)
7
*okane
"Tw" "``'" Department of Community Development
Planning Division
City of
Spokane
Designations that permit MF
Spokrrx
E
Eff
2
1ST t..
�m
t1 ira 6ea u;,
4 x
>� $ti �.
Montgomery .n.F4
s1.99
1—MIssI -Ave
-e
Yalleyway Ave
Sprague-Ave- – `•
ApPleway-+
6'�vd
City of Millwood
Euclid-Ave-
NlaY18Si3-
Manileld-Ave
–Indiana Ave--
Mission-Ave-m•
�
s,q-4,1
Sharp-:?
Ave `m
ThircPFauertH'A
Eighth,Ave
r
l r•; r1%h Ave
)IIIk 1111
BlroadwaylAve —
Vhlleyway-Awe ti NNP0113 �Lpye
=°. pragu$Aver'
Applsway t31vd –
Fourth Ave i :lit!&_r_
Eighth Ave.
IEighthrAv
<15th-Av
24th-Ave
44th Ave
25P'
Ave
Comp Plan Designations
Category
Mixed Use Center
Corridor Mixed Use
Medium Density Residential
High Density Residential
8
0.0°.%.... Department of Community Development
ne CITYHAIIpC"'.
Planning Division
dosiviciimestps,
Vacant Multifamily Analysis
Harvest
Food
11111111 •40
itfr
MiraDealu-Pkwy
lbertson's
e
Knox Ave
Montgomery
Ave
›,
!‘i)
_›-Montg,Q,,
't iti
-",-+--r-4-1_,,, ---,.— -----
SR-901.4,b.
41
Rive
afewayl
2
)adway-Ave
/alleyway
Ave
Win
•
Bowdi sh-R
• Rosauer
geMjSsio
prorAve
Multifamily Analysis
Leg end
=City Boundary
I I Water Bodies
1(4 mite radius from Grocery Store
1(4 mite buffer from Bus Route
Vacant MF Properties
Acres
1-2
▪2-3
NEI 3-4
-4
5-6
▪6-7
▪7-8
▪6-9
▪I0
AllYattrta
super
•Iiiift-Affaillliff--
sfrolligr, 110
SR90-eb=
cc
65
1:a Broadway Ave
•
Trading
CD7
Fred
Meyers
Safeway
yway Ave
I Appleway-Blvd
Fourth-Ave
Eighth-Ave
—Sprague Ave'
Shelley
/ Lake'
9
CITY HA I I(.
ane'4`14 Department of Community Development
Planning Division
Partially Used MF Analysis
M ntgornery
c--0—Ave
SR'90'eb
Mission-Av
-0
C
2
Vaileyway
Ave
Bowdish-R
II
Multifamily Analysis
Legend
City Boundary
'4ater Bodies
114 mile radius from Grocery Store
114 mite buffer from Bus Route
Partially Used MF Properties
Acres
1-2
2-3
3-4
5-6
6-7
Walmart
-ari -reenter
Broadway-Ave
Rosa.,
a feway
III
111111111 1
Valleyway-Ave
Fred III .
Meyers
Sprague-Ave
Appleway-Blyd
II •
[Fourth Ave
Eighth-Ave -0
a
:c
ILa
I C
SR-9
151
•
SiaArey
Lake
In
spokane
r[, Department of Community Development
40°'./7a2i100110'- Planning Division
Direction on Multifamily Analysis
Options :
• Allow market and private sector to propose
new MF areas (annual CPA process)
• Designate new locations for multifamily
development
— This option would require noticing
• 400 foot radius of parcel
• Posting of the site (4x4 sign)
11
41"1.4 rim1^11( r Department of Community Development
SiMane
Planning Division
Site - Specific CPA
17%.144.744016740%.7467-,NVNI
MIN
-IhN* -Ma§V47 ,i4M§9tilin-::?*‘?fq"*.
• •.11 t also
-14gW44443§§:V!_1"
'1414:Stb- WZ- 11.47,6
Okq,11
!4%-Z1- 1-ki;t1S"±&61t14164111;:ii:N-.411SN;It>%3§4- :S1: 111434$4,1t?‘:-
I I 1
20
th
IiuI
EIRE
11111.
11E1111
NENE= NENE
11111•11
INIMEn
uII
ri
1
ig
MIT
11111
1111
111101.
iginuommull
• lublimmomum:
9I1
•1111110111111M
11111111111111-1
11111111171111111
LS 1
•mmuslit
•immumen.
■11r-I MEMMM 17.:=.1•MNIM
Elio'no
hy&firr2
rdi
IMM`Li..11=1,Z=.■=m
12
sookscer r Department of Community Development
MiUev Planning Division
Noticing 400 '
ROL!rth Ave
5th
›.,
N _
_.-
W,,,ffor 00.
, ,A 11111,K211111
v rvorm
...."710/,#)X, /,, ill
-
NEEKAArApe;.#."00,1,
WA (4 Oer-' Il'imillii
Eig rer,dA4.444
.9vmeerveimmimmilm
•C f'Vr}4"1"4 //f f
illeidr; / 40,1 ,;/•0/ HINE
41 .0/•■il Fisi ,
' 11,, ..40
Nmwmill
•Ill1 om by II Elm
2>
.„,
c
I NI
Eighth
tnve
13
CITY HAI.L(ui5":-:;s-'F-
r[, Department of Community Development
Planning Division
Questions
2-Welles ey Aue
Harvest B
Foods/ o
e
a
Euclid-Ave
Buckeye-Ave
D
tgomery
o ct
—Ave
Knox-Ave t-
SR=90°eb
Multifamily Analysis
Legend
City Boundary
Water Bodies
1/4 mile radius from Grocery Store
1/4 mile buffer from Bus Route
Partially Used MF Properties
Acres
- 1-2
- 2-3
3-4
- 5-6
- 6-7
-o
r-Mission-Ave
E
Broad ay Avec-
■
11
Broadway-Ave
ague-Ave
Appleway
Blvd
Valleyway
rourrunr-
Ave
�®_1.1111F
er
afeway
-Foudr4ve
11
Eighth Ave
Appleway-Blvd
Fourth-Ave
D
D
B
x
Va.11
way-Ave
Fred flI i
Meyers
Sprague Ave
SR 9
II
■
Eighth Ave-o
o! �
E a
To
o w
16th Ave
%tese Ram
4th Ave
� � Y
't7nr.I.A_v
Ibert
son's
Shelley
Lake
i I
2-Welles ey Ave
Harvest F
Foods/ SDI:
0
u
Montgomery
Ave
SR-90-wb=
Multifamily Analysis
Legend
City Boundary
Water Bodies
1/4 mile radius from Grocery Store
1/4 mile buffer from Bus Route
Vacant MF Properties
Acres
- 1-2
Eh 2-3
3-4
4-5
- 5-6
- 6-7
PP 7-8
- 8-9
9-10
10
E
Broadway-Ave
T
Sprague Ave
Appleway
Blvd
Fourth Ave
ding
:O.
•
Fred
Meyers'alleyway-Ave
/Safeway ��.•
f Spr'gue Ave
Appleway Blvd
ti
Eighth Ave
D
D
D
am
McDonald-Rd
as
a
0)
a)
Fourth Ave
Eighth-Ave
16th Ave
1I1
Shelley
�Lak�
•
Designations that
Permit MF Development
Wellesley Ave
City of
Spokane
City of Millwood
[SharpAve s
I
rn�Eucl id-Ave
Mariettia-Pve
PTV
90eh.-
City of
Liberty
Lake
Third Ave,
Fourth A
-0
5
'f+y?e�4a�V 116th-Ave1
rip
ighth Aveo
Eighth
ve
Sgu
VA�A�yWiy;Pv
PPP �u
EighthrAve
4
32ndrAve
t
y
44th Ave
Legend
City Boundary
Water Bodies
Arterials
Comp Plan Designations
Category
Mixed Use Center
Corridor Mixed Use
Medium Density Residential
- High Density Residential
Effective Date:08/15/2012
Ordinance No.12-018
Milky
Map Location
0 0.5 1 2 Miles
1 1 1 1
Notice:The information shown on this map is compiled from various
sources and is subject to constant revision.The City makes no claims
or guarantees about the accuracy or currency of this map and
expressly disclaims liability for errors and omissions in its contents.
To confirm accuracy contact the City of Spokane Valley,Community
Development Department,Division of Planning,(509)921-1000.
Product of the City of Spokane Valley,Community Development Department
Split Land Use Designations
-_ NC — H���DR- - r '.' \ '\�\ M —J
_— _ %l /l.Broadway� `c�; �� 6th U
± --- 6th_.
= III LDR 1 ,_\\: �������� \w ■■111 . ■� W.0.4% i�w∎ii //%
Valleyw�ay'' ■■:-Ili■II=._ <N,...�\ .. .; '.:** //� -
CMUi`
HI '
��a o„ ,: :;„�•, f LDR
” \\��*
S�� 8th
L.Sprague !
////
RC 1st 9th
O Tr-�2nd. ApPlekaY \\\
11 111 -------;:1%;-:' 4 `�5 _
3rd CC% '\�`a`
1 111 1 11 I MDR 4��
11 4th ..)1';M:.' r.0` \
1I '?ry �� , F� "�:: .'...%, \\\\�� MDR x
5thl l_
II IIII—
nip . LDR II%. LDR
,111 wea ,:-„,,-, M Ktr:Ck,4*Z SA
Rockwell— \\ .
�.,,4,,e0:�� 4'4'. \Rockwe11*0 \ ter IL1JLR
�\ \
. ., ., ,,,,_,NN„- ,1
...\-. N. Nte.OutA 'NI \ k- .. --. . !..‘, cm.ti N-_,,,,,,,,,,,q'. :7.
\� � Et\\ arS��� a \ \ _: +�, 4'�`\\`rent HI.
LDRL�I Yom' \t,_ i �.. _ a .
Sprague ' \\\\\�� \` `\\\\\
. 1 rff7t ..i,''''s,'N.N .-.1"."---1 N'''''....1:. - :-'4_
', '' .. - ik: . ‘
' 4,:N6:CMU,„.::7- ,:;-, %. -',. Z
ll':?'' 'M .
�. �:
.. 2nd-.
,HDR _k .. MDR
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: February 5, 2013 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2012 Accomplishments Report
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: n/a
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: n/a
BACKGROUND: Staff will present the 2012 Accomplishments Report. The report includes
accomplishments in support of the 2012 Budget Goals as well as general accomplishments of
each City Department.
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT: Mike Jackson, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
PowerPoint Presentation
id
Sfiiikane
j Valley t
"A community of opportunity where
individuals and families can grow and play
and businesses will flourish and prosper."
Animml
iccomplisllmenls
g#61(a<
29121u111a1 Soils
• Continue monitoring wastewater issues, including governance of
wastewater facilities, and pursuit of the most efficient and economical methods to
ensure the continuation of wastewater discharge licenses.
• Pursue the topic of Solid Waste, to include identifying the issues and
obtaining alternatives of joining the consortium or handling it ourselves and the
consequences of each alternative.
• Review and Evaluate development regulations and compare with surrounding
cities.
• Develop a Shoreline Master Program to provide appropriate regulatory
protection for waters of statewide significance as required by state statute.
• Pursue a legislative capital budget request for: 1 ) funding for Sullivan
Bridge replacement, and 2) funding for the acquisition of park land adjacent to the
Park Road Pool.
• Create an Economic Development Plan including options for a new City
Hall.
si �it ;44IImti
jUalley
Admin.Assistant
Oily Clerk.
Deputy City Clerk
Public Works
Mehilenrm�.a
Semasnrriendent
Chnstruoliart
In ter
1.5 FTE
Adrnin Assistant
{City Council;
dtdrrinlSirailwe
Asslstalrt
IPolice Chief
(Contredj
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
by
Department
I Parks andRar:,
Director
Administrative
Assistant
Recreation
Coordinator
Molnionanca
Worker Facilities
(2.0 FTE)
i
Lenart-lace Last
'Relations/Facilities
Coordinator
Senior Canter
Specialist
Senior Engineer-
TraiSc
Assistant Engineer
Traffic
Mai-shard Engineer
Stermyvater
Engineering
Technician II-
Starrnwater
Msun[enFrn0:
Construction Inaped_or
t1.5FTE}
CersterPlece Admin.
Assistant
CentesPlace Offlne
Acsictani
t3epttty City Merrager II
Office As
(2.00 FIE)
,Public Information
Officer
77714 .Sartirx•;,•
(2.0 FTE)
1..
Officer
R d r I tj
Feller Englneak- )
Project Manager
7 o FTE)
Asslstarrl Piiu Ii ear
Tech
erirnician neae ni"
Engineering
Technician I
(2 a FTE)
City Attorney
Adm Intstretive
Assistant
DeW y City 1
Attorney
Cuinnnii:ly
3eye!sprint Oisdnr
Administrative
Aecounlrxl
Manager
IT Special]st
(2O Fir)
Accountant urlget
Analyst
(3.75 FTE)
Database
Adminstrater
Acoeunvng
Tea:hniuian
(2 0 FTEt
ring rt{nnegw
Offim Assistant
Ofilra Assistant I
Engineerirg
Technician
It 5FIE)
•!rill anon -.
Construction
Inspector
_ .F Valley*Wane
Iag'isIaIiva&
Exeeutive/Ie,isIMive $iv vices
City Council, City Manager and Support Staff
Isg!uisllspfsssnlM!ai,
Estimated - 465 Total Councilmember Hours in 2012
• Greater Spokane Valley Chamber of
Commerce
• Spokane Regional Convention &
Visitor Bureau Board of Directors
• Emergency Communications Board
911
• Greater Spokane Incorporated
• Growth Management Steering
Committee of Elected Officials
• Spokane Regional Health District
Board
• Spokane County Housing &
Community Development Advisory
Committee
• International Trade Alliance
• Mayors' Association of Northeast
Washington
• Solid Waste Liaison Board
• Northeast Housing Solutions
• Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency
• Spokane Regional Transportation
Council
• Spokane Solid Waste Advisory
Board
• Spokane Transit Authority
• Tourism Promotion Area Tax
Advisory Committee
-Eitelleg/s/a
suaaorlProvidedto chile%/
• Regular Council Meetings 21
• Study Sessions 20
• Special Meetings 8
• TOTAL MEETINGS 49
• Resolutions Enacted 14
• Ordinances Enacted 29
• Contracts Approved 21
• Bids Awarded 10
arecave/[eg/s/stive-
City Clerrs Mee
• Public Record Requests:
— 352 Total Requests
— .72 average days to respond
2. 12 average days to
completion
— 103 electronic responses
— 157 hard copy responses
2,309 paper and 5 cd copies
for $891 .50 total fees collected
20 referred to outside agencies
— 13 no records on file
— 4 referred to the website as a
response
• Records Management:
— 109 new boxes to storage
39 boxes destroyed
385 additional files and
documents destroyed
(records not previously
stored)
-legislifire s IxeeuIive/IaiisIative-
1
2012 Budget Goal: Pursue a legislative capital budget request for 1 ) funding for
Sullivan Bridge replacement, and 2) funding for the acquisition of park land adjacent
to the Park Road Pool.
• 2012 - We were unsuccessful in receiving funding for
either project due to shortages in State funding ;
Aminot.401111.111r--_
abut, ,
• 2013 — Council approved placing Sullivan Bridge
' replacement funding before the legislature once again
it
littilP10011111111111%N-'11,-
-� :ir�.a-rk7.1
-legislafire & ixeculive/IegisIaIivo-
2012 Budget Goal: Continue monitoring wastewater issues, including
governance of wastewater facilities, and pursuit of the most efficient
and economical methods to ensure the continuation of wastewater
discharge licenses.
2012 Budget Goal: Pursue the topic of Solid Waste, to include
identifying the issues and obtaining alternatives of joining the
consortium or handling it ourselves and the consequences of each
alternative.
9
J
4,egislatin z Bleagiveogislaliw
2012 Budget Goal: Create an Economic Development Plan including
options for a new City Hall.
City of
Spokane Valley —
Action
To provide a favorable
climate for business &
development within our
City
Short-term Goals/Projects
• Participate-Regional
Tourism
• Promote City as business
friendly community
• Promote access to river
• Implement Certified Sites
Program
• Provide funding for
partners
•
•
•
Ad Hoc
Committee
Long-Term Goals
Planning—Vision for the
City of Spokane Valley will
provide direction and
funding opportunities
Enhance existing
Sports/Sporting facilities
Diversity—recognize
balance between business
& residential in economic
development
Council
Input —
Citizens,
Business,
Property
Owners
Economic
Development
Plan
Organizational Creating and maintaining forum for exchanging ideas and
addressing the needs of the community.Develop strategy,raise
funds,work with partners in efficient manner.
Product
Investments of labor and capital to improve the community.
infrastructure,gateways,business parks,etc.
Market
Activities to recruit individuals to enhance the economy,such as
retired citizens and enlarging the market area in which they could
receive products and services.
Business
Business Growth and Investment.The"core of economic
development.Business attraction,retention and expansion,
tourism,and startup and emerging business.
Workforce Policies that build the skills of the local workforce.Partnerships
between business,education,and government so that all
residents can be contributing members of the local economy
-legislative&Exeeuliva/Iajiislative-
In collaboration with all Departments :
- Council & Staff explored opportunities for
economic growth aided by City operations and
infrastructure
Spokane
Valley
Two-Phase Plan
Short Term
— Add Economic Development to Business Plan
— Expand our inventory of resources & make them available
to the public
— Devote staff resources to work more actively with partner
agencies that provide economic development for Spokane
Valley
— Move forward to strengthen operational weaknesses
— Add Sprague stormwater improvement to 2012 Budget
— Make a decision on moving the permit center to City Hall
— Continue to look for process improvements at permit
center
Spokane
.0Valley
— Review Development Regulations
— Send a welcome letter to all businesses when they register
— Staff move forward to develop information, brochures,
web links to partners and initiate more of a direct
economic development presence for the City of Spokane
Valley
— Schedule future Council discussions
• Review of Economic Development Chapter of Comprehensive Plan
• Other
Two-Phase Plan,
continued
Long Term
— Complete an Economic Development plan for the City
— Incorporate Economic Development Plan in
Comprehensive Plan Update for 2012 or future revision
Parks
-160/80//a Ez illi,Is
Some of the ways the City has provided a favorable climate
Roads
Partners
Spokane Valley Business Assoc.
Spokane Valley Arts Council
Innovate Washington
Spokane Regional Sports Commission
Greater Spokane Inc.
Spokane Site Selector
International Trade Alliance
Global Trade Services
NW Business Development Assoc.
Visit Spokane
Spokane River Forum
Greater SV Chamber of Commerce
Permit Center
Police
-1 B/I S/s ire&ExecuUva/IegisIsIive-
IisippoftoIIcoiioaIcIlsvaIopmsit
• Council approved funding for a new Gateway
Access sign on Sprague/Appleway
IxeduhIve/IegisIaliveM
• Entered into an Interlocal Agreement with Spokane County
to develop a trail on the Old Milwaukee Right-of-Way /
University to Corbin
ET.
a
Interlocal Agreement on Milwaukee Railroad RIW
Exhibit "A"
Mission Av
valleyway Av
m
T
a APPleway By a
4th Av 4th Av
16th Av
Broadway Av
SPOKANE VALLEY
6th Av
24th Av
? 25th Pv
a
32nd Av
6.539.6 0 3,269,81 6,539.6 Feet
Valleyway Av Valleyway Av
16th Av
Sprague
24th Av
v
Et-
Mission Ay
Te-
as
Broadway Av Broadway Av
m
Valteyway Av x
SPOKANE VALLEY z
Sprague Av a
sd'!
QrPRd
32nd Av
This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only.Data layers that appear on this map may or may not he accurate.current or otherwise
eliatrle.
8th Av
14
arectivefieg/s/stire-
Purchased land for a park or other civic uses and entered into
an Interlocal Agreement with the Spokane County Library
District intended for a Joint Site Development Plan
-legislative&Exeeuliva/bjisIMive-
• Council reserved $75, 000 for Economic Development
• Staff implemented a media campaign to promote
successful changes to our permitting process
"Spokane Valley has been the best city
when it comes to obtaining permits."
west Spokane valley Warman Manager
Srlan Mansfield
.000 dl Icy spokanevalleymmg
16
-legislative&Exeeuliva/bjisIMive-
• Media campaign included :
— 200 T.V. spots - (KHQ, KREM, KXLY)
— 542 Radio spots - (KDRK, KZBD, KXLY, KZZU, KISC, KKZX)
— 26 Print ads - (S.R., LL Splash, Journal of Bus., Inlander, SV News Herald)
— 15 Billboards & 4 Digital Billboards
ii tit
The Friendliest
Permitting Process
in Washington___
spokanevalley.org
Spokane
Valley
CEDCOMMUNITY&
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Sp°�� Dpe,stansaMunhnislrnlivs jvalley � Sernees
/ inance
IT
HR
Front
Desk
Reception
Ops &
Admin
Deputy City Manager
Contract Administration
Public Information
-Opera= iiris l"►reserriees-
Economic Development Support
Ops/Admin & Executive/Legislative staff worked with Community
Development to create software program to merge business registration
information into "Welcome Letters" for all new businesses.
S1 �kii
i
a11e .
Congratulations!
960 letters mailed in 2012
On behalf of the City of Spokane Valley, we would like to take this opportunity to thank you for choosing Spokane Valley and
welcome you as one of our newly registered businesses. We are thrilled to have you with us!
The City Council and staff make it our priority to offer responsive, competent and excellent service. Our businesses are very
important to us and we work to ensure your complete satisfaction in any way we might be able to help you succeed in your
business ventures.
Enclosed, please find two brochures which provide the City's points of contact should you need any help. We encourage you
to call any of the Councilmembers or staff with your questions, comments or feedback. If you are not sure who to contact,
please call either of us or our front desk reception at 921-1000 for help or, visit www.spokanevalley.org and select the
Business link at the top of the home page.
Again, welcome to the City of Spokane Valley.
Sincerely,
Thomas E. Towey, Mike Jackson,
Mayor City Manager
4peratioss&iiIifluiiisIraIiva Sunless-
Citizen Action Request online entry System
(Spokane Valley C.A.R.E.S.)
• In collaboration with Public
Works and Community
Development, staff received
1 ,265 online requests
• 1 , 020 of those requests
were resolved with the
citizens
• 90 requests were dismissed
(outside our City)
• 155 requests are in process
• Requests include:
— General
— Animal Control & dead
animal removal
— Bike & Motorcycle
detection
— Snow related issues
— Street related issues
— Traffic related issues
— Signage
— Graffiti
yam__-- LINK
PASSPORT
•
City of
Spokane Valley
&10111111M1119$evices-
Public Information
Economic Development
Tourism Support
• Redeveloped Spokane
Valley Passport
— Printed professionally
Distributed to all Spokane
Valley hotels/motels
— Sent to visitor centers
within 200 mile radius
including keeping `Visit
Spokane' Visitor Centers
supplied
Whether is the
RUSH
or yoirr first rock climb,
finding the perfect
PERFECT
selection for your
seasonal wardrobe,
SAVORING
the nuances of local
winesµbrews,
or sampling the
FRESH
local cooing,
enjoy it all from
the qo let canfealle
BEAUTY of
• Reviewed Visit Spokane
publications and website
and proposed
updates/improvements
• Developed in-house
Lodging Tax tourism
lt promotions proposal
SOokane
Located in the heart
of the Spokane region
www.ris itspolane,comfspokanera lley
• Reserved and created ad
for Visit Spokane Visitor
Guide 2013
em s a►o a s p iiIiilhii!StfaIiVe Sameas-
Public Information
Economic Development Marketing Support
A FRIENDLY WAY OF
DOING BUSINESS
Just a few of the many
reasons you should bring
your business to us...
No City business and
operations tax
No personal income tax
Low property tax.rates
Fifteen of the region's
largest industrial parks
Fifteen of the region's
leading office and
business parks
Plenty of parking,and
its all free
Retail Sales Tax-8.7%,
including WA Combined
Excise Tax of 2.2%
Spakane
.000Valley
spokanevalley.org
• Drafted marketing proposal
• Drafted marketing RFP
• Assisted in selection of marketing
agency
• Reviewed and provided input on
ads
• Reserved and created ad for
Greater Spokane Relocation
Guide
Spokane Valle
r.1.1 eom ki
.P�s 4r
ti•y�114.ft+. rw
Ih
iffitastiodi
k.
lab Rib-
11■.■,/■.mt
.0 a i fi4 r..n..yr.
—..bib
22
em s a►o a s p i1IIilhil!SIf2I1VD Sameas-
Public Information
Collaborative Public Information
Outreach Projects
State of the City at the
Spokane Valley Mall
• First City Hall at the Mall
• Coordinated four State of the City events
• Public Works/Street Preservation projects
• Parks & Recreation Parks and Programs _
• Community Development Shoreline, Comp Plan , &
temporary sign brochure review
• Finance - Lodging Tax and Outside funding
40enitoos s Maloisfraire Senfices-
Human Resources
• Developed & negotiated a successor union
contract for represented employees of the
City.
• Met the AWC requirements to achieve the
WellCity Award at the "Excellence" level.
• Transitioned Title VI reporting efforts to the
HR Office with support from the Public
Works Department.
• Conducted and/or assisted in the
recruitment and selection efforts to fill
executive/staff vacancies.
• In 2012, HR became responsible for the
development and maintenance of the city's
website
we (city
Recognized fora commitment to employee health.
OM
BMPLOYEE
BENEFIT
TRUST
Con- ratulations 2012 WellCities!
City of Spokane Valley
24
s SOMess-
Contract act Administration
Animal Control:
• Evaluated animal control options through an RFP
(request for proposal) process
• With Finance Director and City Manager, negotiated a
new interlocal agreement helping to create a regional
system with a new 50-year animal shelter for no
additional cost to the City
Prosecution Services & Criminal Justice System:
• Collaborated with the City Attorney's Office in
evaluating & identifying preferred service options and
areas of focus for improvement in service delivery and
cost control
Public Safety contracts:
• Met with Spokane County representatives and agreed
to create enhanced reporting for the Public Safety
contracts, allowing greater analysis to quickly identify
trends & develop appropriate responses
25
-Operatons s lanlistraire Saiviess-
Finance si IT
• Implemented State Auditor mandates &
recommendations:
— Completed 2011 annual financial report and
related audit process
— Reorganized & renumbered City account
numbers per State Auditor's Office update of
the BARS (budgeting, accounting & reporting
systems) manual. To be implemented in
2013.
• Expanded 2013 Budget document to
include revenue, expense and fund
balance information for each fund as well
as expanded fund descriptions.
• Expanded contents of Finance Activity
Report:
— Included revenue, expense and fund balance
information for each fund, each month
Ciry of Spokane Valley
2013
BUDGET
VHF
•
GREENACRES
PARK
L4.7q®LTSr1[D 2617
-Operatons s Administraire Seiviess-
Finance si IT
• Prepared an analysis that discussed the financial merits of
acquiring/constructing a new City Hall building
• In coordination with the City Manager's office:
— Developed analysis of fund balance which established goal to maintain
General Fund reserve of no less than 50% of recurring expenditures
— Assisted in review of animal control services and negotiation of SCRAPS
contract
• In coordination with City Manager's Office and Public Works
personnel:
— Developed plan to provide pavement preservation financing at a level of
$2.05 million per year for at least next 4-years (2013-2016)
• In coordination with Human Resources department:
— Created, tested & deployed on-line employment application system
— Tested on-line time sheet feature that ties into payroll software
— Revised the City website for more user-friendly navigation
•Spokane Valley
0
-Operatom s Mmlisingre Seiviess-
Finance si IT
• Changed City Hall internet service provider
- Cost savings of $5,000 over 3-year period
— Quadrupled speed (5MB to 20MB)
• Changed telephone service provider
- Cost savings of $4,800 over 3-year period
• Converted all cell phones and mobile data cards to a different carne
— Allows for increased coverage
• Replaced 36 leased computers
— All of City is operating on Windows 7
• Added conference phone capabilities to City council chambers
• City Wi-Fi access points added to cover Public Works and west end
of first floor
-Operatom s Mmlisingre Seiviess-
Finance si IT
• Worked with Public Works to review, acquire and ultimately deploy
fleet maintenance software
• Acquired equipment for hearing assistance for CenterPlace & off-
site meetings and events
• Installed wireless audio visual equipment in Opportunity conference
room
• Replaced 3 servers & updated/repurposed 1
• IT Staff closed an average of 110 support calls per month
— Approximately 5 per day
• No system-wide outages occurred during normal business hours in
2012
-Mee silk City Arromen
2012 Budget Goal: Develop a Shoreline Master Program to provide appropriate
regulatory protection for waters of statewide significance as required by state
statute (while recognizing the rights of private property owners).
• With the assistance of outside council advised the Council and staff on
identifying appropriate regulatory framework for regulations under the
Washington State Shoreline Management Act, including scope of
permissible City discretion.
2012 Budget Goal: Pursue the topic of Solid Waste.
• Analyze governance of solid waste management, research issues in
pursuit of efficient and economical methods of solid waste
management.
�eeame City aaomey-
2012 Budget Goal: Create an Economic Development Plan including options
for a new City Hall.
• Participated as members of the management team in
discussing and formulating a City Economic Development
Plan .
• Review current City Hall Lease and space design .
• Assist Community Development in preparation of contract
for consultant to conduct architectural services for space
planning & design to develop options for a new City Hall .
iMe e oft/i, Cilvillafisy-
DapanuiioiiIahIoaIs siceomplisamems
>Continued the monitoring of all City franchises, contracts and
interlocal agreements.
Successfully negotiated, drafted and
completed agreements with :
• Spokane Valley Fire District (code compliance and plan review)
• Spokane County Library District (acquisition of real estate)
• Spokane County (purchasing, Appleway Trail, emergency
management)
• Geiger (work crews), addenda to various interlocal agreements
relating to the criminal justice system
• City of Millwood (Argonne Road safety project)
• Renegotiated a contract amendment with Splashdown
• Reviewed and approved approximately 190 contracts for the City
32
-Mee oi Ile Cilvillafisy-
DOpS#hiihflhShIOSIS a ieeoiiipIis9i!iaiits
Assisted in identification and implementation of code
compliance revisions
• Conducted meetings with Community Development and Code
Compliance to:
— identify potential revisions for improved efficiency.
— researched and analyzed all potential code modifications.
• Prepared proposed revisions for consideration by City Council
and implementation by staff, including revising relevant code
compliance documents and pleadings.
33
-Mee aft,, C -
D e p a r�n e e to/b o a/s keoInpIisIhflhsflIs
• Assisted all departments in analyzing and revising interagency
guidelines, manuals and policies.
— Reviewed, revised and adopted revisions to Governance Manual; drafted a
comprehensive purchasing manual, which is nearly complete.
— Drafted and adopted policies on donations, small and attractive assets,
Planning Commission emails and Planning Commission Rules of Procedure.
• Reviewed, negotiated and completed various land acquisitions and
issues including Sprague Park purchase, Balfour Park re-
acquisition, Brown Park re-acquisition and acquisition of the
Gateway entry property.
• Assisted in cost analysis, reviewed current contracts and evaluated
the availability and effects of possibility of in-house prosecutor
services.
-Palle Safety-
• Intelligence-Led Policing concepts continue to be
improved and successfully utilized by Spokane Valley
Deputies and Detectives
• Utilizing evidence-based best practices to implement effective policing
strategies
• Enhancing communications between Patrol and Detectives
• Utilizing resources and analyzing crime trends more efficiently
• Because SVPD is having greater successes at solving
crime trends due to that communication and analytical
data, the benefits to the community include:
• More arrests of individuals organizing the crime
• Recovery of property
• Reduced burglaries and vehicle prowls
-Palle Safety-
• Burglary Task Force formed in Spring 2012
— From April to July 15th, the Spokane County Sheriff's Office and the
Spokane Valley Police arrested 214 suspects on a total of 728
charges.
— 27.3% decrease in residential burglaries in Spokane Valley from July
1 -July 13, 2012, compared to August 1 -August 13, 2012.
• Vehicle Prowl Task Force
— In the district 6 area, we reduced the number of vehicle prowlings 44%
compared to the previous 4 weeks.
— Vehicle prowlings in the entire Spokane Valley were reduced by 24%
compared to the same time period in 2011 .
➢ Citizen involvement and reporting is a major key to the Sheriffs Office
success in solving these crimes.
-Palle Safety-
• Implementation of the Lethality Assessment Program - Maryland
Model (LAP)
— Integrates an evidence—based screening tool with an accompanying
protocol to:
• identify at the scene those victims of intimate partner domestic violence who
are at the greatest risk of being murdered, and
• connect them immediately to the local domestic violence program.
— Research shows that putting victims in touch with services as soon as
possible can reduce domestic violence related homicides, serious
assaults and repeat victimization.
— Spokane Co. Sheriff's Office and national domestic violence statistics, to
include a three-year study, has determined that 73% of our homicides are
domestic violence-related.
— The goal of the LAP is to prevent domestic violence homicides, serious
injury, and re-assault by encouraging more victims to utilize the support
and shelter services of domestic violence programs.
Spo
`` ilklA
-Palle Safety-
• Implementation of Aggressive Driving Program -
- This is a pro-active approach by Spokane Valley Police Department
that focuses on the dangers of aggressive drivers in the City of
Spokane Valley.
Statistics show that in 2012, there were 2,237 reckless driver calls
and in 2011 there were 2, 198 reckless driver calls in the City of
Spokane Valley. In an effort to reduce these numbers and ensure
the safety of the motoring public in Spokane Valley, unmarked non-
traditional law enforcement fleet vehicles are being used to focus on
this type of driving behavior.
The program is intended to educate the public about the dangers of
aggressive drivers.
— It is the goal of the SVPD, through education and enforcement, to
reduce the number of aggressive drivers in Spokane Valley and
ensure the safety of the motoring public.
Spo
-Palle Safety-
• Implementation of Spokane Valley Traffic School
The Spokane Valley City Council passed an interlocal
agreement, which enables most drivers issued traffic infractions
by Spokane Valley Police to choose an educational class
instead of paying a fine.
As of 1/12/12, citizens who are issued traffic infractions now
have the option of attending traffic school and upon successful
completion of the six-hour class, the traffic infraction will be
dismissed and will not appear on the attendee's driving record.
— Benefits of the Traffic School:
• Public Education of traffic laws
• Improve driving behavior to reduce serious injury collisions and
fatalities
• Improve communication and public relations with our citizens
-Palle Safety-
• False Alarm Program success:
— As of 12/31 /12, the number of open/active accounts with
the City of Spokane Valley False Alarm Reduction Unit is
up to 3,085 accounts over last year's total of 2,378
accounts.
— As expected, due to the increase in the number of
open/active accounts, the total false alarm calls have
increased to 977 calls this year, up over last year's 867.
— However, we have seen a decrease in the false alarm rate
which has dropped to 316.7 false alarm calls per 1 ,000
accounts; previously, we were at 364.6 false alarm calls
per 1 ,000 accounts in 2011 .
Spo
-Pale Safety-
• Spokane Valley Police continues to participate with State
and Federal agencies utilizing strategic planning
processes to focus on regional crime problems.
• Crime prevention outreach with all Spokane Valley Mall
businesses for potential critical incident planning .
• New Patrol vehicle striping process is saving
$700/vehicle.
-Palle Safety-
• Pro-active crime prevention bank visits by our
officers to reduce robberies.
• Participated in a Table Top Exercise with Spokane
Valley Mall Security and Valley Fire reference a
critical incident response.
• The Sheriff's Training Unit held 99 classes providing
instruction to approx. 3, 163 persons at the Training
Center as of 12/31 /12 .
— Hotels booked by those attending training in Spokane
Valley totaled over 3,000, with an economic impact of
$702, 150.
— Total training cost savings to SCSO is $521 ,488.
-Palle Safety-
• IA Pro (professional standards software system)
implementation
• provides a means to catalog, store, and track incidents such as
citizen complaints, internal investigations, use of force incidents,
vehicle pursuits, injuries, and property damage.
• provides a powerful data analysis capability and an "early warning"
feature that is useful in the prompt detection of potential personnel
issues and/or training deficiencies.
• provides a web-based, paperless system that allows supervisors to
electronically enter data into the system in a more timely manner.
• Enhances mandatory accreditation reports.
• Maintain Facebook site for the Spokane Valley
Police Department.
• Spokane Valley citizens are informed of current news and
operational successes;
• Photos of recovered stolen property are posted; many victims have
located their items thru the photos and were able to get their
property back;
• The Chief's crime prevention and safety tips are posted.
ma m m ua/4 g e e re/o p m e n t
DdnernIDePafIIileDI iecoiiipIisIliaanIs
• Implemented the Roadmap
to Enhanced Permitting
• Implemented new Permitting
software
• Worked with the Economic
Development Committee
• Assisted in 2012 Marketing
Program
• Significantly Improved
Customer Service
$180,000,000
$160,000,000
$140,000,000
$120,000,000
$100,000,000
$80,000,000
$60,000,000
$40,000,000
$20,000,000
$-
Department Valuations
Valuation
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Valuation
$147,019,151
$166,863,584
$105,111,785
$86,403,059
$65,369,891
$107,492,110
46
Total Construction Permits
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Total Permits
3972
3585
2993
3340
3454
4010
47
Total Department Revenue
$3,000,000
$2,500,000
$2,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,000,000
$500,000
$0
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
IuiI�ingDivisiuniccuinpIishinenIs
• Completed a code
amendment to extend
timeframes for building
permits and building
applications
• Continued interlocal
agreement to provide
building plan review to
Airway Heights
• Modified Permit Center
to improve efficiency
DeveIapDheDIEDgliDeefunhiceuhIlpIisIlIilenIs
• Completed draft revised
Standard Plans in cooperation
with Public Works
• Completed Mapping and
Hydrology Study of Forker
Draw Floodplain re-Study
• Review of the Saltese Flats
Floodplain Re-Study
• Participating in development of
Regional Low Impact
Development Manual
• Participating in development of
Regional Wellhead Protection
regulation
2012 Budget Goal: Develop a Shoreline
Master Program to provide appropriate
regulatory protection for waters of
statewide significance as required by
state statute.
• Continued the update to the
Shoreline Master Program
• Participated in state-wide
SEPA reform
• Completed Annual
Comprehensive Plan Update
• Conducted Planning
Commission Training
9111Sf PIaihhigkeuiiipIisIlinehiIs
• Worked with Spokane Region on Urban Growth
Areas and Annexation Agreements
[2012 Budget Goal: Review and evaluate development regulations and
compare with surrounding cities.
• Completed development code text amendments
• Boundary Line Adjustments
• Landscaping
• Sign regulations
• Multifamily setbacks adjacent to SFR
• Use Matrix update
• Animal shelters
Cole Coniplianee
• 386 Cases
Investigated
• 220 Cases Closed
• One case abated
by the City
• Three cases sent
to abatement but
were cleaned by
the property
owners before the
City had to
proceed .
Before
After Cleanup
Before
After
-Paris and
Remotion-
Ft :70
r r, :•
• .4!
' ' •
"7"71
I fir
FivlsMiiiiiiislrnlisn a
• Installed new playground
equipment and ADA
accessibility at Terrace View.
• Completed CenterPlace
South Landscape project with
two shelters, turf, and irrigation.
• Administered West Entry Gateway Sign project with installation of welcome
sign and landscaping.
• Coordinated with hundreds of volunteers for the National Day of Service to
complete improvements to Valley Mission and Appleway Trail.
FivlsMiiiiiiislrnlisn a
• Began update of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan.
• Held Grand Opening of Greenacres Park with
ribbon cutting ceremony and tree planting.
• Coordinated with city staff and Spokane County
Library District on acquisition for Sprague
property for joint Library/Park.
• Participated on Project Sports 2012 Vision Team
to develop and expand our region's sports
facilities and programs.
• Partnered with WA State Parks, Dept. of
Ecology, and city staff for Centennial Trail
riverbank repair project.
• Researched, developed, and distributed
Mirabeau Point Park Walking Trails Map
and Walk in the Wild Zoo historical
brochure.
CoellaiFisee
• Hosted our first annual Open House to showcase our venue to area
businesses and brides/grooms.
• Coordinated Valleyfest activities at CenterPlace, including the Step Up for
Down Syndrome Walk, Babyfest, Taste of the Valley, Car Show, etc.
Y Y Y
• Renewed contracts for leased space with Community Colleges of Spokane,
Central Valley School District, and Red Rock Catering.
61
CoellarFisee
• Purchased acoustical panels to improve sound in the Great Room.
• Hosted 951 events, with a significant increase in business meetings.
• Scheduled an additional 862 reservations for classes/training for
Community Colleges of Spokane and Central Valley School District.
• Revenues were up $120,839 from 2011 .
• Staff remodeled two small classrooms into one large room to accommodate
needs of customers.
62
IuuhI/CS IDIIIDCfuDh!DII
• Held first annual "Paws in the Pool" dog swim event
with 48 lucky dog participants.
• Held the 4th annual Valley Mission Haunted Pool event, which continues to
grow in popularity and spooked over 740 victims this year.
• Offered Free Summer Park Program and served over 1 ,637 children.
• Served 443 participants over the 10-week Summer Day Camp program.
lushes se d I T e stes do n
• Provided two free Saturday Outdoor Movies in the Park with over 1 ,200
people in attendance.
• Hosted and coordinated with the Rotary Club of Spokane Valley
for the "Breakfast With Santa" event. The event brought in 540 people.
• Partnered with Spokane Valley Partners, Liberty Lake, ministries, schools,
and city staff to create the Spokane Valley Hunger and Homeless Network.
Sail/DIV Cefile,
• Continued to emphasize healthcare hosting seminars from
Medicare to health issues.
• Hosted and coordinated the 3rd annual Senior Empowerment
Exposition Resource Fair which drew in 32 vendors.
• The Senior Association completed a new makeover of the
Senior Center lobby, providing a cozy and restful spot for folks to gather.
• The Senior Center continues to be a place where seniors can go for help,
friendship, fun, and sense of community.
llL\ M1 16
1..II.kka\“4YU4 k1:YLI....uSLLLMLLY tin bLaib
City of -
Spokane
Valley
Stormwater
Pull/c Works
Snow Removal
• Upgraded priority map to reflect
specific problem areas
• Added a 9th Snow Plow
• Received and responded to
over 200 citizen requests
• Used 126, 000 Gallons of deicer
• Used 960 Tons of granular deicer
SireeiMainienanee
Street and Stormwater Maintenance
• Pavement Preservation — 5260 Tons
• Asphalt patching — 2030 Tons
• Sidewalk repair — 136 Yards
• Crack sealing — 12 Tons
• ADA Ramp Upgrades — 37 on
University and Appleway
• Curb and Gutter repair — 1 ,680 LF
• Gravel road grading - 2 . 1 miles
maintained
• Shoulder repair
• Drainage structure repair
SireeiMainienanee
Pavement Preservation Projects
i
• Appleway Blvd . Between University and Dishman Mica
• University Rd . from Appleway to Sprague
• Farr Rd . From Appleway to Sprague
• Boone Ave. from Long to Greenacres
SireeiMainienanee
Geiger Work Crew
• Geiger Work Crew picked up 48,260
pounds of garbage
• Approximately 11 ,200 man hours worked
• Mowed 104 acres of dry land grass
• DOC Work Crew and Geiger Work Crew cleaned up and
mowed the Appleway Right-of-Way
• Mowed Noxious Weeds in cooperation with the Spokane
County Weed Board along our ROW's
i
Traffic Division
Low Cost Safety Improvements — 16th/Bowdish
Reflective sheeting on posts to reduce
running of stop signs.
i
Traffic Division
Low Cost Safety Improvements — 16th/Pines
Delineators to block curb lane and
reduce T-bone type collisions.
Traffic Division
Citizen Request Examples
• Responded to 162 C.A. R. E. S
requests
• At the request of the SVFD, changed
Stop Control at Main and Raymond
from east/west to north/south .
— Modified signing and added
striping to guide vehicles.
• Citizen stated that the signals at
32nd/Bowdish and 32nd/S . Pines "jump
around" too quickly during low traffic
volumes.
- Modified operation to be more
efficient and "jump around" less. .
Traffic Division
New Flashing School Beacons
• McDonald Elementary
• Evergreen Middle
• Bowdish Middle
• East Valley Middle
• $30, 000 in Grant Funding
• City paid for installation
Traffic Division
New Bike Lanes Installed
• Added approximately 4.75 miles
of new bike lanes
• University
— 16th to 4th
— Sprague to Main
• Fancher
— Sprague to Broadway
• Evergreen -
— 16th to 32nd
• Appleway between University and
Dishman Mica
— Upgraded existing Bike Lane to a
buffered bike lane
Traf!ie Ilivision
Signal Improvements
• Sprague-Appleway
— Installed evening coordination plan
for couplet
• West Sprague
— Adjusted all timing plans from
Fancher to City Limits to include
new Wal-Mart signal
• Sprague/Progress and
Sprague/Adams
— Installed accessibly push buttons
with audible and vibratory
notification and countdown heads
DON'T START
Finish Crossing
If Started
TIME REMAINING
To Finish Crossing
DON'T CROSS
Traf!ie Ilivision
Capital Project Support
• Designed/Reviewed Traffic Control Plans for
16 Projects
— Detours
— Signal Timing Adjustments
— Regular field reviews to check traffic control &
deal with signal or ADA related concerns
• Managed Design of Phase 1 Street
Preservation
• Provided Traffic Data for Project Designs
J
L12 O 7 2 TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS
Millwood
Broadway & Stanley
Striping
r•.
McDonald& Mallon
Striping
1
1111°)Sprague& Custer
Traffic Improvements
i
•
Safety 1 Operation Project
Signal Timing Work
Bicycle Improvements
New School Beacons
New Signal
8th & Park
Striping
1
vs
1 East Valley Middle
Accessible Push Buttons
Sprague &Adams
Spokane
Val
Bowdish
Middle
C'
16th & Bowdish
Reflective Post
i
.J
McDonald
Elementary
Accessible Push Buttons
Sprague& Progress
Evergreen Middle
16th &S. Pines
Roadway Delineation
1
1
;
1
Date: 1/29/2013
Slorinwaler 1111111;
2012 System Improvements
• Sprague UIC Retrofit
• Sprague
Reconstruction
• Evergreen Road
• Green Haven Sewer
Project
• Maintenance Projects
at 12 locations
• Sidewalk Projects at 2
locations
0 7 TO WATER
its4Rie a vcitefENI TS
1 Fancher 5 Baltiw+n
1140
I,.
iByer.N 1 cp1
i Dye{&Mkt '
I ti
Sprague. Dollar •Thiermaan
Parts, NJ 2503 j
T �P�ai . 17■01,1
University a Montgomery Idewalk I
tif r
Sullivan Bridge
[rain Ritrnirt
w
1 Cunt Fipmiity�
Dyer N 1615 1
':� gueAve kJIC
tsTrirrwattorr Project
9th&CroMrrnan
,
Dis#arrran Mica&
Appielersiy L
6rxec:Itsh
!r i
.•;.•A,.4.4.1 '4
3
14th Ave.
Custer to Carnahan
14th E 13$05
Stormwa#er Irnprovement s
Storrnwater CP
Maintenance Division
Design t Planning Phase
a
liternawater ImlrrovetTent
IMP oft CIF Project
rpplew y SW Feasthiliky
° -F
Disnrnan Mica S 421
8th&WDodlawn
•
Sullivan Rd,
Indiana to Trent
Indiana, E 18400
[ ison E 1521 r
nee&
Hcrane&Long Cr$ena[re5
Sprague Ave,
Evergreen to Sullivan
1 McDonald&10th
A iar a 12th
Greenee*es
IBarker a 2nd
Cgwe 1116/2[13
Slorinwaler 1111111;
Sprague Avenue Swale Project (UIC Elimination)
Before wAL Almost Done . . .
81
ji,jrmwaIenuIiIiIJ,
2012 Operations
• Responded to 41 Citizen
Requests involving flooding
or drainage problems
• Bid Service Contracts for:
— Roadway Landscape Services
— Storm Drain Cleaning
• 1 ,230 cubic yards of street
debris swept
• Structures Cleaned:
— 206 drywells
— 1 ,263 catchbasins
— 195 sidewalk/curb inlets
• Maintained over 11 acres of
irrigated turf in roadside
stormwater facilities
82
Slorinwaler Vilill;
2012 Funding
• Received $667,000 in grants for the Sprague Swales Project
• Awarded $885,000 for Regional Decant Facility
• Reviewed 20% of commercial properties to confirm proper
utility fee charges.
• Stormwater Utility fee $21 per Residential Unit annually —
among the lowest rate in the State - collects $1 .8M/year
Impervious Area
Slorinwaler 1111111;
Drainage Structure Inspections
• Developed
Inspection Tracking
Tool/Database
• Input inspection
data into GIS
• 231 "Debris Only"
Inspections
• 744 "Condition
Assessment"
Inspections
84
20 1 Z SYDRMWATE14
INSPECTIONS / RESPONSE
r..__
I
i araussAkerawsnikei, •�••,
f\\,_,1 a
_.., %
�—� .
{y '1 M■llw crud Y.r •��
• I
•
-J. :d M A M • • I A.•
i. i A ..•
• A 0118 1
II
•
• Verar GrAnace&
'III A. .
+ _ ; 1 ..a
• r....
1
?nor A • •M•• •• ••
V war•
Q J——r.,
® , ` s..r is yy + • I► l
I.._..—_4_,3 ,, SOc
_�,
••
NO
2012 Stormwater
Inspections/Response
Illicit Discharge&Spill
d Response
New SAREF Response
Q Drywells-Condition Assessment
Inspection
() Drywells-Debris Only Inpsection
# -""-"�1 10411
!d
{Ph
s1 •
$ 1--.•r Date'1/16/2013
.i _ t
•• (•
—._,A f
\-t,i
84
CIP Division
Capital Improvement Projects
• Completed Valley Corridor environmental assessment
• Completed 2013-2018 Six Year TIP
• Submitted 20 grant applications for Federal STP(U)
funding
• Received approximately $9,789,032 in grant funding
C1P DIVISION
2012 Construction Projects
Faucher Rd.
Sprague to Broadway
ti
Vista Rd_
Argonne Rci_
Multan to Montgomery F
y+
,+
�5.1 Lii•
`
+• T}SLTNI
Mission to Knox
4th Ave_
Dishrnan-Mica to Farr
Park Rd. :,.
am to 12th� ,Y
,.r •
Legend
- Reconstruction Projects
Sidewalk Projects
- Preservation Projects
Montgomery Rd.-
University to Van Mader
Sullivan Road West Bride
Temporary Repairs
Mission Ave.-
Union to Pines
[University Rd.-
Sprague to Main
r �
University Rd.-
4th to 16th
❑ishman-Mica-
16th to Schafer
Sprague Ave.Reconstruction
Evergreen to Sullivan
Pines Rid_-
16th to 24th
Evergreen Rd_Reconstruction
16hto32nd
48th Ave_and Sindown Ct
86
CIPDivision
Construction
Project
Contractor
Total Cost
Sullivan Rd West Bridge Temporary Repairs
N.A. Degerstrom
$358k
Sprague Avenue Reconstruction — Phase 2
Poe Asphalt
$2.5m
Evergreen Road — 16th to 32nd Reconstruction
Shamrock Paving
$1 .5m
Sprague Ave Recon—Phase 2
Evergreen Rd—16th to 32nd Recon
Sullivan Rd W Bridge Temp Repairs
1
CIPDivision
Construction
Project
Contractor
Total Cost
Sidewalk Infill
Wm Winkler
$477k
Sidewalk & Transit Stop Accessibility
Wm Winkler
$174k
48th Ave & Sundown Ct pavement repairs
Poe Asphalt
$131k
48th Ave Pavement Repair
Sidewalk Infill Project—16th to 24th
CIPDivision
Construction
Project
Contractor
Total Cost
2012 Street Preservation Projects
$631 k
• Phase 1 -4th Ave — Dishman Mica to Farr
Vista Rd — Mission to Knox
Spokane Rock
Dishman-Mica Rd — 16th to Schafer
Products
• Phase 2 -Fancher Rd — Sprague to Broadway
$680k
Mission Ave — Union to Pines
University Rd — Sprague to Main
Argonne Rd — MuIlan to Montgomery
• University Overlay — 4th to 16th
$226k
Dishman-Mica —16th to Schafer
Fancher Rd —Sprague to Broadway
University—4o(to 16th
1
CIPDivision
Design
Project
Designer
Cost
24th Avenue Sidewalk—Adams to Sullivan
Staff
$281k
Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan concrete intersection
Staff
$2.4m
Mansfield Avenue Connection
Staff
$1 . 1m
Spokane Valley-Millwood Trail
Staff
$5. 1m
Sullivan Rd W. Bridge
CIPDivision
Design
Project
Designer
Cost
Sullivan Rd Bridge Drain Retrofit
Staff
$562k
Sullivan/Euclid concrete intersection
Staff
$1 .5m
Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement
Consultant
$19.7m
Sullivan/Euclid concrete Intersection
Sullivan Rd. West Bridge
DRAFT
ADVANCE AGENDA
For Planning Discussion Purposes Only
as of January 31,2013; 8:30 a.m.
Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative
To: Council & Staff
From: City Clerk, by direction of City Manager
Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings
SPECIAL MEETING: Wed,Feb 6,2013, 9 a.m.to approx 11 a.m., Spokane County, Council Joint Meeting
Spokane County Risk Management Office Conference Room, 1033 West Gardner Avenue
Agenda: Presentation from Department of Ecology Regarding Solid Waste
February 12,2013,No Meeting(City Legislative Action Conference ICLAC1 in Olympia)
February 19,2013, Study Session Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Feb 11]
ACTION ITEMS:
1. Consent Agenda(Claim Vouchers,Payroll,Minutes) (5 minutes)
NON-ACTION ITEMS:
2.February Community Recognition,Presentation of Key and Certificate—Mayor Towey (5 minutes)
3. Proposed Amended 2013 TIP—Steve Worley (15 minutes)
4. Library/Park Update—Mike Stone (15 minutes)
5. Interlocal Agreement,Purchasing—Cary Driskell (15 minutes)
6. Disaster Response Procedures—Cary Driskell (20 minutes)
7.Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
8. Info Only: (a)CMAQ/TA Grant Projects,(b)Dept Rpts; (c)Planning Comm Minutes Jan 10
(d) School Beacons [*estimated meeting: 80 minutes]
SPECIAL MEETING Feb 26,2013 Winter Workshop 8:30a.m.-5:00p.m. [due Tues,Feb 19]
Council Chambers (Note: no evening Council meeting)
Tentative Topics: Ten-Year Anniversary
Work Plan 2013 City Hall
Manufactured Homes Zoning Business Route Signage
Council Goals Solid Waste
Legislative Agenda City Funding Opportunities: Outside Agency;Lodging Tax
Council Meeting Processes Misc. Items:Appleway Beautification
Thurs,February,28,2013(10 a.m. —9 p.m.)—City Hall at the Mall,Food Court
March 5,2013,Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Feb 25]
1. Public Access Plan Review(Shoreline Master Program)—Lori Barlow,Tadas Kisielius (30 minutes)
1. CMAQ/TA Grant Projects—Steve Worley (15 minutes)
2. Sign Code Discussion—John Hohman (30 minutes)
3.Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 80 minutes]
March 12,2013,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon March 4]
1. PUBLIC HEARING: Draft Amended 2013 TIP—Steve Worley (10 minutes)
2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes)
3. Proposed Resolution 13-001: Acceptance of SMP Public Access Plan—Lori Barlow (10 minutes)
4.Motion Consideration: CMAQ/TA Grant Projects—Steve Worley (10 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 35 minutes]
Draft Advance Agenda 1/31/2013 3:19:47 PM Page 1 of 2
Sat,March 16 2013, 10 a.m. to 4 pan. —Spokane Valley 10`"Anniversary/Birthday Celebration
March 19,2013, Study Session Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon,March 11]
1.Advance Agenda
March 26,2013,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,March 18]
1.March Community Recognition,Presentation of Key and Certificate—Mayor Towey (5 minutes)
2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes)
3.Motion Consideration: Amended 2013 TIP—Steve Worley (15 minutes)
4. Information Only: Dept Reports; Planning Commission Minutes [*estimated meeting: 45 minutes]
April 2,2013, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon,March 25]
1.Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
April 9,2013,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,April 1]
1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes)
April 16,2013, Study Session Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,April 8]
1.Advance Agenda
April 23,2013,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,April 15]
1.April Community Recognition,Presentation of Key and Certificate—Mayor Towey (5 minutes)
2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes)
3. Information Only: Dept Reports; Planning Commission Minutes
April 30,2013, Study Session Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,April 22]
1.Advance Agenda
OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS:
ADA Transition Plan Revenue Policy, Cost Recovery
Appleway Landscape Improvements Solid Waste Analysis
Arts Council Speed Limits(overall system)
Bidding Contracts(SVMC 3.—bidding exceptions) Spokane Valley Day at the Fair(Sept 10,2013)
Budget,2013 amendment SRTC Interlocal (amended)
Budget workshop for 2014(early June?) Regional Transportation Issues
CDBG(spring 2013) TIP(June,2013)
Coal Train EIS
Crime Reporting *time for public or Council comments not included
Future Acquisition Areas
Gateway,Regional MOU
Governance Manual
Interlocal Agreement,Purchasing
PEG Funds (Education)
Public Safety Contract,Proposed Amendment
Draft Advance Agenda 1/31/2013 3:19:47 PM Page 2 of 2
i.4 w,--- ,
G�, _ PARKS AND RECREATION } ,-
Spokane e . vauey 1
FOURTH QUARTER REPORT .-
LValley OCTOBER--DECEMBER 2012 '
ADMINISTRATION AND PARKS: q.
• Projects in progress last quarter were
completed this quarter:
0 CenterPlace South Landscape r , y '
Development Project ?', . � .f � ^ �.�„l ;
o Terrace View Playground ' < --.: ,, - ° I r . , -- ,
Yg - t -'' �� v. . = - fit+ .YID-
Replacement Project '7- , 171 ' ' 'y fir` i1 .,,,i'-'
o Spokane Valley West Entry Signi
and Landscape Improvement •.
Project
• For many years the Milwaukee Railroad ROW (now known as the Appleway Trail) has been vacant
and uncared for on a regular basis. As a result, some property lines are unclear and vegetation from
adjacent properties may be encroaching on the Trail. This is something to keep in mind as the City
works its way through the development and beautification process of this Trail.
• Work on the Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update continues with Studio Cascade The next step
in the process is developing questions for a telephone survey that will be conducted with the public.
• The Sprague property was officially purchased. Per our Memo of Understanding, both the City and
the Spokane County Library District have one year to develop a joint site plan for this project. A
Request for Qualifications (RFQ) was advertised for a consultant team for site development planning
for a joint park/library site. We received 15 submittals, and a selection committee will create a short
-list of five consultant teams to interview.
• We continue to participate on the Project Sports 2012 Vision Team coordinated by the Spokane
Regional Sports Commission. The team is currently considering two locations for a large fieldhouse,
one of which is near Mirabeau Point Park in Spokane Valley.
• Staff continues to be a part of meetings with the Sullivan Bridge consultants and State Parks
regarding the Sullivan Bridge project. The project will have both short— and long-term impacts on
Sullivan Park, and staff is working on potential improvements to mitigate the impacts and improve
the park.
• Staff has been busy working on several year end items, including the renewal of the Senske Lawn
and Tree Care contract for maintenance of all our parks.
• A new Janitorial Services contract for the Police Precinct was bid in December. Argus Janitorial was
the lowest responsible bidder. We are in the process of getting the contract processed.
i)LI i: A '1. ! 1 .,,i, J _ft, „ ..Li i . - TV; gi',$„; , _I :
i !!!
- 1
CENTERPLACE: max- -
rc• CenterPlace had a booth at the Greater Spokane Incorporated (GSI) , `°"' ,,} t G``'Is,
Business Fair which was held at the Northwest Casino in October. The .. �' ��` = - x
event was well attended. " •-., .. x .: 4'`
• Acoustical panels were purchased for the Great Room. These panels will %°c"t• % - ' � ''jf=
improve the sound quality in the Great Room, particularly when the room
in not full. The panels will take approximately two weeks to install and installation will be complete
by the end of March.
• Central Valley School District expressed interest in leasing a larger room at CenterPlace but one was
not available so staff remodeled two rooms on the second floor to combine them into one big room,
Room 212. CVSD is very happy with the extra space. The remodel was done by our staff at a
fraction of the cost it would have cost us to contract the work to be done. This remodel also freed
up Room 213 which was previously rented by CVSD.
• Staff took 103 CenterPlace reservations this quarter for events in 2012 and 2013, We hosted 951
events in 2012 which is 99 more over the same time period last year, and we have 338 events on the
books for 2013 which is up 21% over last year. The most significant increases in reservations have
been in business meetings and worship services. We hosted events for 73 unique businesses in the
last quarter of 2012.
• In addition to the reservations to the public, CenterPlace staff does the scheduling of the rooms for
our leasers (Community Colleges of Spokane and Central Valley School District). We took 862
reservations for classes/training sessions for these groups which were held at CenterPlace in 2012.
In comparison, in 2011 the Spokane Convention Center hosted 480 events of which 169 were minor
or like size to those at CenterPlace per their 2011 yearend report.
• CenterPlace hosted over 131,564 participants in 2012, which does not include walk-in visitors we
have throughout each day. This number represents events, meetings, Senior Center activities,
programs, and more. That's an average monthly attendance of just under 11,000 visitors. We are
excited with the increase in use of CenterPlace, truly a Regional Event Center, throughout the year.
�I �k f
ilk
r t
k
r _ - J
if I
t
i ill .i` o
It I V
M
4 k P ry
,,',„-* "lilt Y. \ -4 ! -3 r
2
RECREATION AND AQUATICS:
• We held the 4th annual Valley Mission Haunted Pool event, which continues to grow in popularity
and spooked over 740 victims this year The haunting lasted for four days and there were 115
local area high school volunteers from EV, CV and University High Schools, and Eastern
Washington University. We collected 460 pounds of food to donate to Spokane Valley Partners
and recovered 108% of costs.
• We hosted and coordinated with the Rotary Club of Spokane Valley for the "Breakfast With (r..,
Santa" event. The event brought 540 people into CenterPlace for the two-hour event. In �• ' � .,
addition to staff and the Rotary, there were 49 local high school volunteers bussing '
tables, serving food, and helping with arts and crafts. ';
• There's still plenty of fun exercise to be had indoors with the cool temperatures,
as demonstrated by the 40 couples who grabbed their dancing shoes and (r' •
participated in our weekly dance lessons this fall. '
• It looks like we may have some young musical geniuses in the making, with 54 # \ R
people who attended our fall Tune Tales Parent and Child music classes, ''�`
Who knows...maybe we helped create the next Miles Davis or Ringo Starr? ••-
'r
• What does a Parks and Recreation Department do? Well, some lucky ' i.+
S
IP ;
ummit Elementary School first and second graders found out during a " • ,r:
fun, interactive presentation by our Recreation Coordinator. ,i,E 44
• Staff attended Community Connection events held by Central Valley •, _ '._,
School District at various schools to network and learn more about , , r{,
what they are doing for the students and community. - �':'
• Our Recreation Coordinator was involved in the creation of the .+ Via•+,
j
Spokane Valley Hunger and Homeless Network to address t ,
these issues, This group meets twice a month and is '' +v, ,..4 , I
comprised of school staff, Spokane Valley Partners, Liberty J _
! .+
Lake, ministries, and city staff. �,; ''1 '
• We are also a part of the Healthy Communities Network. , I, )'
Staff began the planning, coordination, and vendor S (`' , _ \'. .A
recruitment for the "Get Connected" event to be held
at CenterPlace on February 28, 2013 from 3-6pm. . . • , .
This is a resource fair for all ages, abilities, and
socioeconomic status. I t
,
• Staff is a part of the city's 10th Anniversary f, of 7
Committee, working on the photo contest, '
planning, and developing rules and policies. , ?_( , y _ • ., A 4, ,
ilio::• You missed out if you didn't join us for the M 4
Zumba Party we hosted at CenterPlace in `�)
partnership with the YMCA. Zumba is f' '�`?4—.
„p -••—
the latest craze that combines a high- - '-”' -": - '' # a
energy cardiovascular workout with „j 'f - � .' ",a.
pulsating Latin music and many
dance styles into a fun, calorie- 1
burning experience. 3
SENIOR CENTER; i ' Ain OCT
• The Senior Center hosted its annual fall fashion show with :, ,4 _r
97 in attendance. This is in conjunction with the Cancer w
Care Discovery Shop and catered by Red Rock Catering. l i -.1�.; t' I, 1
• WSU Nursing students finished up their practicum in the
Wellness Center. They provided valuable services to the
seniors including checking blood pressure, blood sugar, and answering general
health questions. To reach more people, the students placed a table outside the senior dining
area each Tuesday.
• One of the important services that is perhaps overlooked is the resource and referral
information that is available for seniors. Many people are helped through these referrals.
• Wii bowlers came in 3rd place for the countywide tournament!
• The Annual General Membership Meeting for the Senior Association was held. The board of
directors reported the financial statement and introduced members who are running for the
board, and then elections took place.
• Senior Health Insurance Benefit Advisors (SHIBA), part of Aging and Long Term Care of
Eastern WA, met weekly with seniors who had questions about Medicare providers. This is a
free service offered to area wide seniors 65 and over.
• For the month of November, the Spokane County Clean Air Agency provided information on
clean air and placed an air quality kiosk in the lobby. No word yet on how clean our air is or
isn't in our lobby.
• While we can't accommodate the "mall walkers," some seniors have come to CenterPlace for
walking exercise along with the socialization. A 93-year-old retired accountant has even
calculated a one-mile exercise routine utilizing the staircases and hallway...yep, they never
stop counting in life. Another gentleman with a walker is strolling for therapeutic purposes.
<< , • The annual silent auction fundraiser was held with gift
r � baskets donated by various groups. The baskets were on
Amt ,. *: , { display and available for bidding for most of December, and
the association raised over $600 for the general fund.
tt .
• The board of directors voted to purchase two new
GO GO scooters from American Seating and Mobility to add
to the three they already have. All five are used and very
appreciated by the participants. No one wants to divulge his top speed, for fear of a ticket.
• Attendance counts were October (3,284); November (3,500); and December (1,943). These
totals do not include the walk-ins we have each day.
• Picklebail participants at the HUB counts were: October (264); November (211); and
December (197). New member counts were: October (13); November (12); and 4
December (22).
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: February 5, 2013 Department Director Approval: ❑
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Draft 2013-2018 Stormwater Capital Improvement Project List
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 90.48, Chapter 173-200 WAC, Title 33 U.S.C. 1251-1376;
Storm and Surface Water Utility: SVMC 3.80;
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: 2013 Budget Approval, October 30, 2012
BACKGROUND: Staff is working on the development of a Stormwater Utility Capital
Improvement Program (SWCIP). The formulation of a project list is central to the development
of the SWCIP. Staff is in the process of developing this list, which is prioritized based upon
criteria such as: local and regional flooding concerns, water quality, failing or inadequate
infrastructure, erosion, and system-wide enhancements. Staff also evaluates public requests for
service or improvement. The priority projects are then listed by year based available local funds
and anticipated State grant funding. Once the capital projects list has been created the strategy
is to pursue stormwater grants to assist with funding for these priority projects if applicable.
Those projects that are ranked as a lesser priority are added to the backlog list and will be
reevaluated annually for funding consideration.
Staff plans to bring the proposed six-year Stormwater Capital Program along with our priority
project list for 2013 to Council for discussion at a future Council Study Session.
OPTIONS: n/a.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: n/a
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Projects would utilize exising money from Stormwater Fund
#402 and Aquifer Protection Area Fund #403. Depending on priority and timing of the projects,
impacts could potentially include a request for a 2013 budget amendment for 2013 stormwater
projects.
Noteworthy is that the 2013 Budget for the Aquifer Protection Area Fund #403 did not include an
appropriation for the Decant Facility Project pending the completion of the study needed to site
the facility itself. With Council's decision to proceed with the project, a future 2013 Budget
amendment will be required to appropriate the $980,000 estimated cost which will be offset with
a $735,000 Department of Ecology Grant, $150,000 from the Department of Transportation and
$95,000 of Fund #403 reserves.
STAFF CONTACT: Eric Guth, Public Works Director
Art Jenkins, Stormwater Engineer
ATTACHMENTS: n/a