The URL can be used to link to this page

2013, 02-19 Study Session AMENDED AGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION FORMAT (With Some Action Items) Tuesday,February 19,2013 6:00 p.m. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11707 East Sprague Avenue,First Floor (Please Silence Your Cell Phones During the Meeting) CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: APPROVAL OF AENDA AMENDED AGENDA: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SPECIAL GUESTS: Presentation of Lilac Court Members ACTION ITEM: 1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. a.Approval of the following claim vouchers: VOUCHER LIST DATE VOUCHER NUMBERS; TOTAL AMOUNT 01/17/2013 28097-28116 $274,326.79 01/18/2013 28117-28150 $500,421.88 01/18/2013 28151 $201.00 01/18/2013 28152-28175 $182,955.17 01/22/2013 4200-4215; 28176 $107,311.66 01/24/2013 28177-28189 $136,427.37 01/25/2013 28190-28214 $204,313.05 01/25/2013 28215-28237 $50,871.02 01/25/2013 5544-5546 $343.00 01/29/2013 28239-28242 $22,317.02 02/01/2013 28243-28263 $15,750.09 02/01/2013 28264-28288; 131130032 $1,559,490.09 02/07/2013 28289 $39,566.35 02/08/2013 28290-28344; 205130014,205130163 $260,087.11 02/08/2013 4213,4214,4216,4217; 28345-28349 $245,094.03 GRAND TOTAL $3,599,475.63 b.Approval of Payroll for period ending January 31,2013: $396,924.32 c.Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of January 22,2013,Formal Meeting Format d. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of January 29,2013 Study Session Format e. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of February 5,2013, Special Meeting f. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of February 5,2013, Study Session Format g. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of February 6,2013, Special Meeting with Spokane County Study Session Agenda,February 19,2013 Page 1 of 2 DISCUSSION LEADER SUBJECT/ACTIVITY GOAL NON-ACTION ITEMS: 2.Mayor Towey February Community Recognition Presentation of Key and Certificate 3. Julie Honekamp, SNAP Request for Letter of Support Discussion/Information SNAP CEO 4. Steve Worley Proposed Amended 2013 Transportation Discussion/Information Improvement Plan(TIP) 5.Mike Stone Library/Park Update Discussion/Information 6. Cary Driskell Interlocal Agreement,Purchasing Discussion/Information 7. Cary Driskell Disaster Response Procedures Discussion/Information 8.Eric Guth Small Works Projects Bids Discussion/Information 9.Mayor Towey Advance Agenda Discussion/Information 10. Information Only (will not be reported or discussed): (a) CMAQ/TA Grant Projects (d)School Beacons (b)Department Reports (e)Hearing Examiner Annual Report (c)January Planning Commission Minutes 0 Response to Public Comment 11.Mayor Towey Council Check in Discussion/Information 12.Mike Jackson City Manager Comments Discussion/Information 13. EXECUTIVE SESSION: RCW 42.30.110(11(b) - Acauisition of Real Estate ADJOURN Note: Unless otherwise noted above,there will be no public comments at Council Study Sessions. However,Council always reserves the right to request information from the public and staff as appropriate. During meetings held by the City of Spokane Valley Council,the Council reserves the right to take"action"on any item listed or subsequently added to the agenda. The term"action"means to deliberate,discuss,review,consider,evaluate, or make a collective positive or negative decision. NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical,hearing,or other impairments,please contact the City Clerk at(509)921-1000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made. Study Session Agenda,February 19,2013 Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: February 19, 2013 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Following Vouchers: VOUCHER LIST DATE VOUCHER NUMBERS; TOTAL AMOUNT 01/17/2013 28097-28116 $274,32639 01/18/2013 28117-28150 $500,421.88 01/18/2013 28151 $201.00 01/18/2013 28152-28175 $182,955.17 01/22/2013 4200-4215; 28176 $107,311.66 01/24/2013 28177-28189 $136,427.37 01/25/2013 28190-28214 $204,313.05 01/25/2013 28215-28237 $50,871.02 01/25/2013 5544-5546 $343.00 01/29/2013 28239-28242 $22,317.02 02/01/2013 28243-28263 $15,750.09 02/01/2013 28264-28288; 131130032 $1,559,490.09 02/07/2013 28289 $39,566.35 02/08/2013 28290-28344; 205130014,205130163 $260,087.11 02/08/2013 4213, 4214, 4216,4217; 28345-28349 $245,094,03 GRAND TOTAL $3,599,475.63 Explanation of Fund Numbers found on Voucher Lists H001 -General Fund Other Funds 001.011.000.511 City Council 101 —Street Fund 001.013.000.513. City Manager 103 —Paths &Trails 001.013.015.515. Legal 105—HotellMotel Tax 001.016.000. Public Safety 120---CenterPlace Operating Reserve 001.018.013.513, Deputy City Manager 121 —Service Level Stabilization Reserve 001.018.014.514. Finance 122—Winter Weather Reserve 001.018.016.518. Human Resources 123 —Civic Facilities Replacement 001.032.000. Public Works 204—Debt Service 001.058.050.559. Comm. Develop.-Administration 301 µ-Capital Projects (15t'/%REET) 001.058.055.559. Comm. Develop.--Develop.Eng. 302—Special Capital Proj (2°6'A%REET) 001.058.056.558. Community Develop.-Planning 303 --Street Capital Projects 001.058.057.558. Community Develop.-Building 304—Mirabeau Point Project 001.076.000.576. Parks&Rec—Administration 307—Capital Grants 001.076.300.576. Parks &Rec-Maintenance 309—Parks Capital Grants 001.076.301.571. Parks &Rec-Recreation 310—Civic Bldg Capital Projects 001.076.302.576. Parks &Rec-Aquatics 311 —Pavement Preservation 001.076.304.575. Parks&Rec- Senior Center 312—Capital Reserve 001.076.305.571. Parks&Rec-CenterPlace 402---Storinwater Management 001.090.000,511. General Gov't-Council related 403 —Aquifer Protection Area 001.090.000.514. General Gov't-Finance related 501 —Equipment Rental&Replacement 001.090.000.517. General Gov't-Employee supply 502—Risk Management 001.090.000.518. General Gov't- Centralized Services 001.090.000.519. General Gov't-Other Services 001.090.000.540. General Gov't-Transportation 001.090.000.550. General Gov't-Natural &Economic 001.090.000.560. General Gov't-Social Services 001.090.000.594. General Gov't-Capital Outlay 001.090.000.595. General Gov't-Pavement Preservation RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Approve claims for vouchers as listed above. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun, Finance Director; ATTACHMENTS: Voucher Lists vchlist 01/1712013 2:30:15PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 1 Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 28097 1/17/2013 000150 ALLIED FIRE&SECURITY RCB1097462 28098 1/17/2013 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC 9395522 9397513 28099 1/17/2013 000572 CARTER,CAROL Expenses 28100 1/17/2013 001169 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY January 2013 28101 1/17/2013 000109 COFFEE SYSTEMS INC 3820:123715 28102 1/17/2013 003083 DEBOISE, BRITTANI Expenses 28103 1/17/2013 002883 DOUGLASS, LANCE 28104 1/17/2013 002883 DOUGLASS, LANCE 28105 1/17/2013 000179 GFOA 28106 1/17/2013 003057 HAGADONE DIRECTORIES INC 28107 1/17/2013 000895 NEWBILL,BRANDON 28108 1/17/2013 003258 NOR-WEST DEVELOPMENT INC 00-FNA326 01-FNA7 02-FSW248 0131582 509-688-0300-0000 Expenses 98-FNA847 Fund/Dept 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.032.000.543 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.237.10.98 001.237.10.98 001.237.10.98 001.018.014.514 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.237.10.98 Description/Account SECURITY MONITORING:CENTER Total: LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY FOR LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT C Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : PETTY CASH:8200 Total : COFFEE SUPPLIES:CENTERPLAC Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : SWALE DEPOSIT FEE REFUND SWALE DEPOSIT FEE REFUND Total SWALE DEPOSIT FEE REFUND Total: 2013-CALHOUN, DUFFEY,WILSO Total : ADVERTISING FOR 2013:CP Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : SWALE DEPOSIT FEE REFUND Amount 112.50 112.50 37.08 37.08 74.16 34.60 34.60 7.16 7.16 63.75 63.75 16.64 16.64 1,000.00 1,000.00 2,000_00 1,000.00 1,000.00 640.00 640.00 892.08 892.08 21.64 21.64 1,000.00 Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List 0//1712013 2:30:15PM Spokane Valley Page: 2 Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 28108 1/17/2013 003258 003258 NOR-WEST DEVELOPMENT INC (Continued) 28109 1/17/2013 003259 PACIFIC ELECTRIC 02-FSW299 28110 1/17/2013 003260 PARAS CONSTRUCTION INC 02-FNA47 28111 1/17/2013 000323 SPOKANE CO UTILITIES January 2013 28112 1/17/2013 002212 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS 9777177 28113 1/17/2013 001911 THE GLOVER MANSION CP710 CP727 28114 1/17/2013 002963 THE INLAND EMPIRE GARDENERS 7436 28115 1/17/2013 003262 VILLAGE SQUARE APARTMENTS,ATTN: Refund 28116 1/17/2013 000098 WA CRIES INSURANCE AUTHORITY 101122 20 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Fund/Dept 001237.10.98 001.237.10.98 001.076.302.576 001.016.000.521 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.018.013.513 502.502.000.518 Description/Account Amount SWALE DEPOSIT REFUND Total : Total : SWALE DEPOSIT FEE REFUND Total : SPOKANE CO SEWER CHRGS:JAI' Total : MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE: Total : EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLAI EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLAI Total : NEWSPAPER ADS IN 2013 Total : CSV ENDORSEMENT FEE REFUNE Total : 2013 LIABILITY/PROGRAM ASSES Total : 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,478.72 1,478.72 81.53 81.53 184.33 152.18 336.51 632.50 632.50 13.00 13.00 263,922.00 263,922.00 Bank total : 274,326.79 20 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 274,326.79 Page: 2 vchlist 01/18/2013 2:55:27PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 1 Bank code: Voucher 28117 28118 28119 28120 28121 28122 28123 28124 28125 28126 28127 28128 apbank Date Vendor Invoice 1/18/2013 003263 ALL SURFACE ROOFING&,WATERPRO(4159 1/18/2013 003078 ALLWEST TESTING&ENGINEERING 60698 1/18/2013 001816 BENTHIN&ASSOCIATES 1/18/2013 000796 BUDINGER&ASSOC INC 1/18/2013 000729 CH2MHILL INC 1/18/2013 002572 CINTAS CORPORATOIN 1/18/2013 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 1963 1973 M12517-1 3847532 606743320 107547 1/18/2013 002365 GENERAL DYNAMICS ITRONIX CORP S0027276 1/18/2013 001003 GEOENGINEERS INC 0121555 0121963 120600 1/18/2013 002518 INLAND PACIFIC HOSE&FITINGS 483274 1/18/2013 003190 LUKINS&ANNIS, P.S 318165 1/18/2013 003251 MDI MARKETING 9495 Fund/Dept 101.042.000.543 311.000.162.541 311.000.162.541 403.000.163.595 101.042.133,595 303.303.155.595 101.042.000.543 001.018.013.513 001.016.000.521 311.000.174.595 311.000.174.595 303.303.115.595 101.042.000.542 001.013.015.515 001.090.000.550 DescriptionlAccount Amount REPAIR LEAKS FOR MAINT FACILI- Total : 0162-CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL: Total : 0162 MONUMENT RESTORATION SPRAGUE UIC ELIMINATION SURV Total : 12-022 L MATERIALS TESTING 013: Total : 0155-SULLIVAN RD W BRIDGE SL Total : Total : Total : Total : SERVICES: PW LEGAL PUBLICATION GOBOOKS FOR SVPD 0174-'13 STREET PRES.GEOTEC 0174-'13 STREET PRES.GEOTEC; MATERIALS AND COMPACTION TE: Total : SUPPLIES: PW PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Total : Total : DECEMBER MEDIA INVOICE 2012 1,239.18 1,239.18 12,432.50 12,432.50 886.00 1,506.00 2,392.00 711.20 711.20 112,987.96 112,987.96 187.70 187.70 351.54 351.54 3,339.92 3,339.92 3,628.25 19,569.07 27,053.59 50,250.91 12.74 12/4 507.50 507.50 47,440.64 Page: 1 vchlist 01/18/2013 2:55:27PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 2 Bank code: Voucher 28128 28129 28130 28131 28132 28133 28134 28135 28136 28137 28138 28139 28140 28141 apbank Date Vendor Invoice 1/18/2013 003251 003251 MDI MARKETING 1/18/2013 000788 MEDIA JOE, INC. 1/18/2013 002259 MENKE JACKSON BEYER EHILS 1/18/2013 002203 NAPA AUTO PARTS 1/18/2013 000019 PURRFECT LOGOS, INC. 1/18/2013 000952 RECALL DESTRUCTION SVC 1/18/2013 000709 SENSKE LAWN&TREE CARE INC. 1/18/2013 000994 SIMPSON ENGINEERS, INC. 1/18/2013 000172 SPOKANE CO ENGINEER 1/18/2013 000090 SPOKANE CO INFO SYSTEMS 1/18/2013 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 1/18/2013 002835 SPOKANE COURIER SERVICES LLC 1/18/2013 000093 SPOKESMAN-REVIEW 1/18/2013 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE (Continued) 3503 492 DECEMBER 2012 30467 3901154833 5334253 15953 VLY1211 50309279 9020100148 3281 342830 3189212685 Fund/Dept 001.090.000.518 303.303.060395 101.000.000.542 001.058.056.558 001.058.057.559 001.090.000.518 303.303.168.595 101.042.133.595 001.018.013.513 001.090.000.511 001.011.000.511 310.000.161.594 001.058.057.559 Description/Account Total : BROADCASTING EQUIPMENT MAID Total : PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SUPPLIES: PW Total : Total : SIGNS FOR PERMIT CENTER/PLAI Total : DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION: PERM Total : SNOW REMOVAL FOR CITY HALL Total : 0168 WELESLEY AVE.&ADAMS AN) Total: DECEMBER 2012 COUNTY SERVIC Total : COUNTY IT SUPPORT Total : 2012 VOTER REGISTRATION COSY Total : BROADCASTING SERVICES: DECE Total : ADVERTISEMENT:ACCOUNT 4236 Total : Amount 47,440.64 698.40 698.40 1,242.50 1,242.50 411.90 411.90 119.57 119.57 32.08 32.08 43.48 43.48 20,596.11 20,596.11 37,887.52 37,887.52 12,960.44 12,960.44 86,132.32 86,132.32 60.00 60.00 78830 788.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES:CD 66.40 Page: 2 vchlist 01/18/2013 2:55:27PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 3 Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 28141 1/18/2013 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 28142 28143 28144 28145 28146 28147 28148 28149 28150 1/18/2013 001875 STRATA 1/18/2013 000717 TRANSPO GROUP, INC. 1/18/2013 002185 URS CORPORATION 1/18/2013 001248 USKH, INC. 1/18/2013 001797 VPCI 1/18/2013 000140 WALT'S MAILING SERVICE 1/18/2013 000676 WEST 1/18/2013 003210 WEST CONSULTANTS, INC. 1/18/2013 002640 ZEUTSCHEL EXCAVATING 34 Vouchers for bank code: apbank (Continued) 3189212687 3189212688 3189212689 3189212690 3189212691 3189212693 3189212695 SP120259R-IN 14999 5371244 01372200-2 00009956 35306 826364260 003430 1 Fund/Dept 001.058.057.559 001.058.057.559 001.058.057.559 001.058.057.559 001.058.057.559 001.058.057.559 001.058.057.559 303.303,160.595 303.303.061.595 001.058.158.558 303.303.156.595 001.090.000.518 303.303.155.595 001.013.015.515 001.058.055.559 310.000.164.594 Description/Account Amount OFFICE SUPPLIES:CD OFFICE SUPPLIES:CD OFFICE SUPPLIES:CD OFFICE SUPPLIES:CD OFFICE SUPPLIES:CD OFFICE SUPPLIES:CD OFFICE SUPPLIES:CD Total : 0160 GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATIC Total : PINES ITS DESIGN CONSULTANT Total : SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Total : 0156-TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING Al Total : Total : SULLIVAN BRIDGE Total: LASERFICHE SUPPORT DECEMBER SUBSCRIPTION CHAR Total : SALTESE CREEK FLOODPLAIN STI Total : COSV SIGN&ENTRY IMPROVEME Total : Bank total : 47.26 55.00 17.77 163.79 10.86 164.16 138.24 663.48 12,994.64 12,994.64 640.18 640.18 8,002.49 8,002.49 5,651.29 5,651.29 10,793.91 10,793.91 938.93 938.93 696.28 696.28 1,721.16 1,721.16 65,492.91 65,492.91 500,421.88 Page: 3 vchlist 01/18/2013 3:10:32PM Voucher List Page: 1 Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 28151 1/18/2013 003248 U.S. DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTR DECEMBER 2012 001.013.015.515 PETITION FOR ADMISSION ERIK U 201.00 Total : 201.00 1 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total : 201.00 1 Vouchers in this report 1,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that 1 am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Mayor Date Council Member Date Total vouchers: 201.00 Page: 1 vchlist 01/18/2013 3:32:17PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 1 Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 28152 1/18/2013 000135 APA 28153 1/18/2013 001473 APWA 28154 1/18/2013 000101 CDW-G 28155 1/18/2013 001888 COMCAST 28156 1/18/2013 002920 D1RECTV, INC 28157 1/18/2013 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 28158 1/18/2013 002520 HUSKY INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 28159 1/18/2013 002183 HYDROCAD SOFTWARE SOL. LLC 28160 1/18/2013 002518 INLAND PACIFIC HOSE&FITINGS 28161 1/18/2013 001035 NETWORK DESIGN&MANAGEMENT 076184-12114 096840-12114 672486 W183564 JANUARY 2013 19509319545 39009 39010 39011 77919 78083 78187 78219 78220 78443 6141A.6141B 485145 22134 Fund/Dept 001.058.055.558 001.058.056558 001.032.000.543 001.090.000.519 001.090.000.518 101.042.000.543 001.058.056.558 001.013.000.513 001.058.056.558 101.000.000.542 101.000.000,542 101.000.000.542 101.000.00(1542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 402.402.000.531 101.000.000.542 001.090.000.518 Description/Account 2013 MEMBERSHIP WA CHAPTER 2013 MEMBERSHIP DUES WA CHA Total : MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL:STEVE V Total: SUPPLIES:IT Total : HIGH SPEED INTERNET: CITY HAL Total: JAN 2013 CABLE SVCS: MAINT FA( Total: LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION SUPPLIES: PW SUPPLIES: PW SUPPLIES: PW SUPPLIES: PW SUPPLIES: PW SUPPLIES: PW Total : Total : HYDROCAD SOFTWARE:2013 SUF Total : SUPPLIES: PW Total : HARDWARE/SOFTARE MAINTENA1 Amount 365.00 429.00 794.00 179.00 179.00 796,04 796.04 124.99 124.99 47.99 47.99 83.20 31.45 71.40 186.05 245.36 34.63 52.09 6.30 126.66 398.60 863.64 300.00 300.00 214.27 214.27 2,310.96 Page: 1 vchlist 01/1812013 3:32:17PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 2 Bank code: Voucher 28161 28162 28163 28164 28165 28166 28167 28168 28169 28170 28171 28172 apbank Date Vendor Invoice 1/18/2013 001035 001035 NETWORK DESIGN&MANAGEMEN (Continued) 1/18/2013 000239 NORTHWEST BUSINESS STAMP INC, 88841 1/18/2013 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 1/18/2013 001604 PACIFIC NW PAPER 1/18/2013 002616 ROADWISE, INC 1/18/2013 000235 SECURE SHRED 1/18/2013 000709 SENSKE LAWN&TREE CARE INC. 1/18/2013 003264 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 1/18/2013 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 1/18/2013 000391 SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE DIST.#1 639847230001 137463 54605 54606 54607 54608 54609 86628 5337409 B00891901 51501451 JANUARY 2013 1/18/2013 002555 T. LARIVIERE EQUIPMENT&, EXCAVATI( C01 1/18/2013 000335 TIRE-RAMA 8080020863 Fund/Dept Description/Account 001.032.000.543 SUPPLIES: PW 001.032.000.543 OFFICE SUPPLIES: PW 001.090.000.519 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 001.090.000,518 001.090.000.518 001.090.000.518 001.016.000.523 001.011.000.511 101.000.000.542 001.032.000.543 Total : Total : Total : PAPER SUPPLIES CITY HALL Total : SUPPLIES: PW SUPPLIES: PW SUPPLIES:PW SUPPLIES: PW SUPPLIES: PW DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION SNOW REMOVAL CITY HALL Total : Total : Total : MCAFEE GOLD BUSINESS SUPPOI Total : DEC 2012-HOUSING INVOICE Total : 7TH ANNUAL SPV EMP. RECOGNIT Total : ON-CALL ROAD GRADERS FOR SN Total : 35518D:VEHICLE SERVICE Amount 2,310.96 75.06 75.06 44.07 44.07 1,573.98 1,573.98 5,426.41 5,308.65 5,426.41 5,310.20 5,268.36 26,740.03 98.64 98.64 54.35 54.35 5,102.45 5,102.45 97,739.00 97,739.00 45.00 45.00 3,120.00 3,120.00 65.71 Page: 2 vchlist 01/18/2013 3:32:17PM Voucher List Page: 3 Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 28172 1/18/2013 000335 000335 TIRE-RAMA (Continued) Total : 65.71 28173 1/18/2013 000014 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 045-79971 001.090.000.518 SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE 2013 41,679.18 Total : 41,679.18 28174 1/18/2013 001885 ZAYO GROUP LLC JANUARY 2013-B 001.090.000.518 HIGH SPEED INTERNET CITY HALL 55837 Total : 558.37 28175 1/18/2013 001885 ZAYO GROUP LLC JANUARY 2013 101M42.000.542 DARK FIBER LEASE 24239 Total : 242.39 24 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total : 182,955.17 24 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 182,955.17 I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: 3 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 01/22/2013 10:30:14AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 4200 1/18/2013 000048 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS,401A PLAN Ben47607 001.231.14,00 401A:Payment 32,363.62 Total; 32,363.62 4201 1/18/2013 000682 EFTPS Ben47609 402,231.13.00 FEDERAL TAXES:Payment 30,568.33 Total: 30,568.33 4202 1/18/2013 003256 DISCOVERY BENEFITS,1NC,HRA PLAN Ben47611 001.231.28.00 HEALTH REIMBURSEMENT ACCOUNT 36,300.00 Total: 36,300.00 4203 1/18/2013 000145 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS,457 Pl.) Ben47613 001.231.18.00 457 DEFERRED COMPENSATION:Payr 6,520.81 Total: 6,520.81 4204 1/18/2013 000162 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS,401A EXEC PL Ben47615 001.231.14.00 401 EXEC PLAN:Payment 1,083.90 Total: 1,083.90 4215 1/18/2013 003256 DISCOVERY BENEFITS, INC,HRA PLAN Ben47648 001.231.28.00 HEALTH REIMBURSEMENT ACCOUNT: 400.00 Total: 400.00 28176 1/18/2013 001896 DANIEL H BRUNNER Ben47605 001.231.20.00 BONDURANT,MICHAEL 1203245:Paym 75.00 Total: 75.00 7 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 107,311.66 7 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 107,311.66 Page: vchlist 01/24/2013 2:12:46PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 1 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 28177 1/24/2013 000030 AVISTA 28178 1/24/2013 001606 BANNER BANK 28179 28180 28181 28182 28183 28184 28185 28186 28187 December 2012 December 2012 0618 4064 4375 4458 8861 9048 1/24/2013 001732 GREATER SPOKANE SUBSTANCE 2012 1/24/2013 000070 INLAND POWER& LIGHT CO 94202 1/24/2013 000132 MODERN ELECTRIC WATER CO November 2012 1/24/2013 000451 SPOKANE REG SPORTS COMMISSION December 2012 1/24/2013 000896 SPOKANE VALLEY MEALS ON WHEELS 2012 1/24/2013 001911 THE GLOVER MANSION 1/24/2013 000167 VERA WATER&POWER 1/24/2013 000167 VERA WATER& POWER 1/24/2013 003175 VISIT SPOKANE CP521 2012 2012 5710 Fund/Dept 101.042.000.542 001.076.300.576 001.011.000.511 001.058.056.558 001.011.000.511 001.011.000.511 001.076.000.576 101.000.000.542 001.090.000.560 101.042.000.542 101.042.000.542 105.105.000.557 001.090.000.560 001.076.305.575 101.042.000.542 101.042.000.542 105.105.001.557 Description/Account UTILITIES:PW MASTER AVISTA UTILITIES: PARKS MASTER AVISTA Total : DECEMBER 2012:0618 DECEMBER 2012:4064 DECEMBER 2012:4375 DECEMBER 2012:4458 DECEMBER 2012:8861 DECEMBER 2012:9048 Total : 2012 OUTSIDE AGENCY: ECO DEV Total : UTILITIES:DECEMBER PW UTILITIES:PW Total : Total : 4TH QTR 2012 LODGING TAX REIM Total : 2012 OUTSIDE AGENCY/SOC SERI Total : EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLAI Total : UTILITIES: NOVEMBER 2012 UTILITIES: DECEMBER 2012 Total: Total : 2012 LODGING TAX REIMBURSEMI Amount 25,401.67 7,909.48 33,311.15 135.00 1,119.56 135.00 669.83 756.84 859.62 3,675.85 2,000.00 2,000.00 335.99 335.99 8,081.06 8,081.06 47,378.81 47,378.81 9,000.00 9,000.00 45.27 45.27 2,850.72 2,850.72 2,720.70 2,720.70 23,794.92 Page: 1 vchlist 01124/2013 2:12:46PM Voucher List Page: 2 Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 28187 1/24/2013 003175 003175 VISIT SPOKANE 28188 1/24/2013 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 0056562-1518-2 28189 1/24/2013 001792 WHITEHEAD,JOHN Expenses (Continued) 13 Vouchers for bank code: apbank 13 Vouchers in this report 1,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been fumished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Mayor Date Council Member Date Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount Total: 23,794.92 40Z402.000.538 WASTE MGMT: DECEMBER 2012 3,106.16 Total : 3,106.16 001.018.016.516 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 126.74 Total : 126.74 Bank total : 136,427.37 Total vouchers: 136,427.37 Page: 2 vchtist 01/25/2013 1:04:09PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 1 Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 28190 1/25/2013 003209 BUDGET BLINDS OF N.SPOKANE 62370 28191 1/25/2013 000796 BUDINGER&ASSOC INC 28192 1/25/2013 000143 CITY OF SPOKANE 28193 1/25/2013 000603 CONTRACT DESIGN ASSOC INC 28194 1/25/2013 000683 DAVID EVANS&ASSOCIATES M12266-1 M12435-2 M12445-2 DECEMBER 2012 32373 32374 326973 28195 1/25/2013 003265 DT TREE SERVICE LLC, RAY MCELFISH 1017 28196 1/25/2013 003261 FEHR&PEERS 28197 1/25/2013 001635 ISS FACILITY/EVENT SERVICES 28198 1/25/2013 000265 JACKSON, MIKE 28199 1/25/2013 003238 KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS 84877 498837 498838 498839 498840 503800 EXPENSE Fund/Dept 001.090.000.511 303.303.112.595 303.303.149.595 303.303.154.595 101.042.000.542 001.032.000.543 001.018.014.514 001.058.055.559 101.042.000.542 303.303.159.595 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.013.000.513 11226410-1212 402.402.000.538 Description/Account BLINDS FOR COUNCIL CHAMBER Total : GEOTECH SVCS FOR PROJECT#C 12-022 1 0149 CN MATERIALS TEST 12-022 J MATERIALS TESTING 015, Total : TRANSFER STATION CHAIRS FOR STREET SHOP CHAIR FOR FINANCE Total : Total : SPOKANE VALLEY PLAT REVIEW Total : TREE REMOVAL: PW Total : 0159-UNIVERSITY ROAD OVERPA Total : EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLAI EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLAI EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLAi EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLAI DECEMBER 2012 MONTHLY CLEAP Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT: DEC Total : DECANT FACILITY STUDY Total : Amount 329.36 329.36 161.35 4,437.38 2,210.15 6,808.88 65.40 65.40 1,396.56 698.28 2,094.84 1,470.00 1,470.00 2,445.75 2,445.75 4,585.13 4,585.13 9.71 90.62 14.57 55.16 7,136.00 7,306.06 20.00 20.00 11,961.37 11,961.37 Page: 1 vchlist 01125/2013 1:04:09PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 2 Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 28200 1/25/2013 002556 NORTHWEST WF_ATHERNET INC 28201 1/25/2013 000307 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER 28202 1/25/2013 000881 OXARC 28203 1/25/2013 001276 RANDALL, DAVID 28204 1/25/2013 000709 SENSKE LAWN&TREE CARE INC. 5334254 5334255 2012-9656 DECEMBER 2012 01566SS 1535 28205 1/25/2013 000318 SHAMROCK PAVING INC 28206 1/25/2013 000994 SIMPSON ENGINEERS, INC. 28207 1/25/2013 000172 SPOKANE CO ENGINEER 28208 1/25/2013 000308 SPOKANE CO PROSECUTING ATTY 28209 1/25/2013 000862 SPOKANE ROCK PRODUCTS, INC, 28210 1/25/2013 001083 STANDARD PLBG HEATING CONTROLS 50295 50332 PAY APP 5 15831-02 VLY1212 DECEMBER 2012 PAY APP 3 28211 1/25/2013 001895 TAYLOR ENGINEERING INC Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 101.000.000,542 2012-2013 WINTER FORCASTING Total : 001.016.000.586 Total : 001.076.304.575 Total: 402.402.000.538 001.076.300.576 001.016.000.521 303.303.160.595 303.303.149.595 101.042.000.542 001.016.000.586 311.000.162.541 001.016.000.521 001.076.305.575 1 303.303.168.595 STATE REMITTANCE SUPPLIES: PARKS&REC BETTMAN&DICKEY RD-14TH TO Total : SNOW REMOVAL FOR E APPLEWA SNOW REMOVAL&DE-ICE: PRECI Total : EVERGREEN ROAD CONSTRUCTI( Total : 0149 SIDEWALK INFILL SURVEY S' Total : DECEMBER COUNTY SERVICES Total : CRIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION F Total: 2012 STREET PRESERVATION PHP Total : DECEMBER 2012 MONTHLY MAINT WORK ORDER 22842 Total : WELLESLEYAVE/ADAMS RD SIDE Total : 315.00 315.00 52,874.38 5Z874.38 66.90 66.90 2,432.00 2,432.00 54,35 190.23 244.58 10,749.11 10,749.11 2,175.10 2,175.10 61,150.42 61,150.42 792.49 792.49 20,306.67 20,306.67 553.60 192.40 746.00 2,751.96 2,751.96 Page: 2 vchlist 01/25/2013 1:04:09 P M Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 3 Bank code: Voucher 28212 28213 28214 apbank Date Vendor Invoice 1/25/2013 000337 UPS 1/25/2013 000842 WM WINKLER CO INC 1/25/2013 000487 YMCA OF THE INLAND NW 25 Vouchers for bank code: apbank 25 Vouchers in this report I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Mayor Date Council Member Date 0000Y3F950013 PAY APP 3 December 2012 Fund/Dept 001.058.057.559 303.303.149.595 001.076.302.576 Description/Account LATE CHARGE ON INV:CD Total : 0149 SIDEWALK INFILL CONSTRU( Total : NOV/DEC 2012 OPERATING EXPEP Total : Bank total : Total vouchers: Amount 2.27 2.27 12,526.38 12,526.38 93.00 93.00 204,313.05 204,313.05 Page: 3 vchlist 01/25/2013 1:37:07PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 1 Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 28215 1/25/2013 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC 9399528 S0046501 28216 1/25/2013 002562 CD'A METALS 553665 28217 1/25/2013 000322 CENTURYLINK JANUARY 2013 28218 1/25/2013 001194 DEPT OF ECOLOGY 2013-WAR046507 28219 1/25/2013 000734 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 28220 1/25/2013 003269 DYKES, LLOYD 28221 1/25/2013 002975 FREEDOM SALES AND SUPPLY 28222 1/25/2013 002568 GRANICUS INC 28223 1/25/2013 003177 GUTH,ERIC 28224 1/25/2013 002384 IMS INFRASTRUCTURE MGMT. LLC 28225 1/25/2013 000265 JACKSON,MIKE 28226 1/25/2013 000252 LOWE'S BUSINESS ACCOUNT RE-313-ATB30115053 RE-313-ATB30115055 RE-313-ATB30115074 CRYWOLF 2013043 42215 EXPENSE 10113-1 FEBRUARY 2013 JANUARY 2013 Fund/Dept 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 101.000.000.542 001.076.000.576 402.402.000.531 101.042.000.542 101.042.000.542 101.042.000.542 001.000.000.342 001.032.000.543 001.011.000.511 001.032.000.543 101.042.000.542 001.013.000.513 001.016.000.521 Description/Account Amount LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT C LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT C Total : SUPPLIES:PW Total 2013 PHONE SVCS:ACCT 509 Z14- Total: STORMWATER PERMIT WAR04650 Total : STATE ROUTE ROADWAY MAINT. SIGNAL&ILLUMINATION MAIN INTELLIGENT TRAFFIC SYSTEMS Total : CRYWOLF REFUND:PERMIT V504: Total : FIRST AID KITS FOR MAINT TRUCl< Total : BROADCASTING SERVICES Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT:JAN Total: 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PI. Total : MONTHLY AUTO ALLOWANCE Total : OPERATING SUPPLIES:CP 148.03 189.26 337.29 27.18 27.18 500.75 500.75 12,499.50 12,499.50 20,315.77 4,609.72 50.29 24,975.78 15.00 15.00 177.66 177.66 719.59 719.59 26.17 26.17 2,687.50 2,687.50 300.00 300.00 232.15 Page: 1 vchlist - 01/25/2013 1:37:07PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 2 Bank code: aI]bank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 28226 1/25/2013 000252 000252 LOWE'S BUSINESS ACCOUNT 28227 1/25/2013 003266 MCEUEN,SUSAN 28228 1/25/2013 003268 NAGY, ROBERT 28229 1/25/2013 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 28230 1/25/2013 002424 PITNEY BOWES GLOBAL 28231 1/25/2013 002578 REBUILDING&HARDFACING INC 28232 1/25/2013 000709 SENSKE LAWN&TREE CARE INC. 28233 1/25/2013 002531 SIX ROBBLEES INC 28234 1/25/2013 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST#3 28235 1/25/2013 000311 SPRINT 28236 1/25/2013 001464 TW TELECOM (Continued) CRYWOLF CRYWOLF 638873722001 638873749001 638943407001 639451480001 639451643001 639640998001 1428301-JA13 Fund/Dept 001.000.000.342 001.000.000.342 001.090.000.519 001.018.013.513 001.090.000.519 001.090.000.518 001.090.000.518 001.090.000.519 Description/Account Total: W CRYOLF REFUND: PERMIT V353, Total : W CRYOLF REFUND:PERMIT V5091 Total : OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES: IT OFFICE SUPPLIES:IT OFFICE SUPPLIES: IT 001.090.000.518 POSTAGE METER RENTAL 46471 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 46481 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 5342714 5-658392 JAN 2013 959698810-062 05300390 001.090.000.518 SNOW REMOVAL CITY HALL 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 101.042.000.542 WATER CHARGES:PW 001.058.057.558 001.076.305.575 GPS PHONE:JANUARY 201 Total : Total: Total : Total : Total : Total : 3 Total: INTERNET/DATA/PHONE LINES:JA Total : Amount 232.15 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 72.09 2.35 102.30 41.84 119.56 3629 374.43 275.00 275.00 5,631.75 605.46 6,237.21 97.83 97.83 11.92 11.92 53.76 53.76 70.20 70.20 1,177.10 1,177.10 Page: 2 vchlist 0112512013 1:37:07PM Voucher List Page: 3 Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 28237 1/25/2013 003267 WOOD,BEVERLY Fund/Dept 001.000.000.342 Description/Account CRYWOLF CRYWOLF REFUND: PERMIT V47T Total : 23 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total : 23 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 1,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that 1 am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Mayor Date Council Member Date Amount 25.00 25.00 50,871.02 50,871.02 Page: 3 vchlist 01/25/2013 1:29:07PM Voucher List Page: 1 Spokane Valley Bank code: pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 5544 1/25/2013 003271 LANDED GENTRY DEVELOPEMENT INC PARK REFUND 001237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: ROOM 110 52.00 Total : 52.00 5545 1/25/2013 003270 SCHNELTING,JOHN PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: DINING ROOM 52.00 Total : 52.00 5546 1/25/2013 001342 WA BASSET RESCUE PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: SULLIVAN PARE 239.00 Total : 239.00 3 Vouchers for bank code: pk-ref Bank total : 343.00 3 Vouchers in this report 1,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been fumished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Mayor Date Council Member Date Total vouchers : 343.00 Page: 1 vchlist 01/29/2013 12;27:49P M Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 1 Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 28239 1/29/2013 002968 ALL PRO SOUND 28240 1/29/2013 000321 GREATER SPOKANE INC 28241 1/29/2013 000011 GREATER SPOKANE VALLEY 28242 1/29/2013 003230 POOL WORLD, INC 4 Vouchers for bank code: apbank 4 Vouchers in this report I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Mayor Date Council Member Date 218075 89192 December 2012 209365 FundlDept 001.090.000.518 001.090.000.550 001.090.000.550 001.076.302.576 Description/Account TELEX SOUNDMATE PERSONAL LI Total : 4TH QTR 2012 ECO DEC GRANT RI Total : OUTSIDE AGENCY ECON DEVEL G Total : ADA LIFTS FOR SWIMMING POOLE Total : Bank total : Total vouchers: Amount 2,471.90 2,471.90 10,375.00 10,375.00 4,416.66 4,416.66 5,053.46 5,053.46 22,317.02 22,317.02 Page: 1 vchtist 02101/2013 11:53:47AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 1 Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 28243 2/1/2013 000150 ALLIED FIRE&SECURITY 28244 2/1/2013 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC 28245 2/1/2013 001169 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY 28246 2!1/2013 000326 CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION#19 28247 2/1/2013 003136 GIBSON,CARLY 28248 2/1/2013 000321 GREATER SPOKANE INC 28249 2/1/2013 002991 !AVM 28250 2/1/2013 003277 INLAND NW BUSINESS ALLIANCE 28251 2/1/2013 002990 INPRO 28252 2/1/2013 001635 ISS FACILITY/EVENT SERVICES 28253 2/1/2013 003230 POOL WORLD, INC SVC1073441 9401559 S0047238 S0047248 January 2013 Jan 2013 Expenses 89053 230382 21512 1/30/2013 511398 209366 28254 2/1/2013 002475 POST FALLS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Jan 2013 Fund/Dept 001.076.305.575 001.076305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076305.575 001.032.000.543 001.076.305.575 001.018.014.514 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076305.575 001.076.302.576 001.076.305.575 Description/Account Amount WORK ON DOCK CARD READER Total : LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY FOR LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT C LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT C Total : PETTY CASH:8702,8708 UTILITIES: PARKS Total : Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES: CP Total : 2013 MEMBERSHIP DUES: CAROL Total : ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP AND ADVEF Total : BRIDAL SHOW BOOTH REGISTRA1 Total : EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLAC Total : ADA LIFTS FOR SWIMMING POOL Total : 248.93 248.93 45.25 32.75 6.88 84.88 22.08 22.08 62.65 62.65 11.92 11.92 700.00 700.00 445.00 445.00 650.00 650.00 250.00 250.00 98.50 98.50 6,956.80 6,956.80 EXHIBITOR BOOTH COMM BUSINE 175.00 Page: 1 vchlist 02101/2013 11:53:47AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 2 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 28254 2/1/2013 002475 002475 POST FALLS CHAMBER OF COMME (Continued) 28255 2/1/2013 000019 PURRFECT LOGOS, INC. 30565 28256 2/1/2013 000415 ROSAUERS 28257 2/1/2013 000709 SENSKE LAWN&TREE CARE INC_ 28258 2/1/2013 001971 SITELINES PARK AND PLAYGROUND 28259 2/1/2013 000668 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 28260 2/1/2013 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST#3 28261 2/1/2013 001992 SPOKANE HOTEL MOTEL ASSOC 28262 2/1/2013 001911 THE GLOVER MANSION 28263 2/1/2013 001793 WWRC 21 Vouchers for bank code: apbank ,Jan 14,2013 5337410 5337412 5342716 5342717 14614 45105.9010 Jan 2013 1189 CP732 01-10-13 Fund/Dept 001.076.300.576 001.076.305.575 001.076.300.576 001.076.300.576 001.076.300.576 001.076.300.576 001.076.000.576 001.076.000.576 001.076,300.576 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.000.576 Description/Account SIGNS FOR PARKS SUPPLIES:CP Total Total : Total : SNOW REMOVAL FOR E APPLEWA SIDEWALK SNOW REMOVAL SPRA SNOW REMOVAL FOR E APPLEWA SIDEWALK SNOW REMOVAL SPRA Total : TABLES FOR PARKS Total : UTILITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT Total : WATER IRR CHARGES:APPLEWA' Total 2013 ALLIED MEMBERSHIP DUES Total : EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLAI Total : 2013 ANNUAL AGENCY MEMBERSI Total : Bank total : 21 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : Amount 175.00 46.74 46.74 31.97 31.97 73.92 69.57 147.84 139.14 430.47 2,543.58 2,543.58 1,987.34 1,987.34 8.96 8.96 300.00 300.00 45.27 45.27 650.00 650.00 15,750.09 15,750.09 Page: 2 vchlist 02101/2013 2:26:38PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 1 Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 28264 2/1/2013 001081 ALSCO 28265 2/1/2013 003272 BONDURANT, MICHAEL 28266 2/1/2013 000912 DEX MEDIA WEST LSPO1264006 EXPENSE JANUARY 2013 JANUARY 2013 28267 2/1/2013 000999 EASTERN WA ATTORNEY SVC, INC 70755 70928 70936 70996 28268 2/1/2013 001926 FARR,SARAH EXPENSE 28269 2/1/2013 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 39046 39047 39048 28270 2/1/2013 003278 KERR-BUILT SP-743 28271 2/1/2013 003279 KING, DAVE 00-FNA126 28272 2/1/2013 003276 KINNEY-MATTESON CORP 94-FNA1054 96-FNA630 97-FNA4 97-FNA522 SP-0833 Fund/Dept 001.058.057.558 001.058.057.558 001.076.304.575 001.076.305.575 001.013.015.515 00t013.015.515 00t013.015.515 001.013.015.515 00t018.014.514 Description/Account Amount FLOOR MATS PERMIT CENTER Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : ADVERTISING FOR SENIOR CENTS ADVERTISING FOR CENTERPLACE Total : PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT:JAN Total : 001.058.056.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 001.058.056.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 001.237.10.98 001237.10.98 001.237.10.98 001237.10.98 001.237.10.98 001.237.10.98 001.237.10.98 Total : SWALE DEPOSIT FEE REFUND Total : SWALE DEPOSIT FEE REFUND Total : SWALE DEPOSIT FEE REFUND SWALE DEPOSIT FEE REFUND SWALE DEPOSIT FEE REFUND SWALE DEPOSIT FEE REFUND SWALE DEPOSIT FEE REFUND Total : 39.55 39.55 80.00 80.00 31.74 168.95 200.69 47.50 84.00 45.00 55.00 231.50 50.85 50.85 204.80 204.80 81.60 491.20 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 5,000.00 Page: vchlist 02/01/2013 2:26:38PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 2 Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 28273 28274 28275 2/1/2013 2/1/2013 2/1/2013 003280 LAPTEV,SERGEY 003282 LINDERMAN, LONNIE 003281 LINDSEY CONSTRUCTION 28276 2/1/2013 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 28277 2/1/2013 000019 PURRFECT LOGOS, INC. 28278 2/1/2013 003284 RANSIER,ALLEN AND DEBBIE 28279 2/1/2013 003288 REED, ROBERT 28280 2/1/2013 000709 SENSKE LAWN&TREE CARE INC. 28281 2/1/2013 003287 SHUVARIKOV,ALEKSANDER 28282 2/1/2013 000773 STUDIO CASCADE, INC. 28283 2/1/2013 002254 TOWEY,TOM 28284 2/1/2013 000087 VERIZON WIRELESS 28285 2/1/2013 003283 WHITE,GEORGE 99-FNA310 99-FNA463 97-FNA524 641016081001 30579 02-FNA112 SP-0880 5347492 95-FNA1021 1790 EXPENSE 1156446100 1156448070 01-FNA400 Fund/Dept 001.237.10.98 001.237.10.98 001.237.10.98 001.018,013.513 001.016.000.521 001.237.10.98 001.237.10.98 001.090.000.518 001.237.10.98 001.058.056.558 001.011.000.511 001.016.000.521 001.016.000.521 001237.10.98 Description/Account Amount SWALE DEPOSIT FEE REFUND Total : SWALE DEPOSIT FEE REFUND Total : SWALE DEPOSIT FEE REFUND Total : OFFICE SUPPLIES Total : DECAL FOR POLICE CRUISER Total : SWALE DEPOSIT FEE REFUND Total : SWALE DEPOSIT FEE REFUND Total : SNOW REMOVAL FOR CITY HALL Total : SWALE DEPOSIT FEE REFUND Total : PLANNING SUPPORT SERVICES Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT:JAN Total : AIR CARD FOR POLICE CHEIF AIR CARDS FOR POLICE DEPARTh Total : 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 18.91 18.91 260.88 260.88 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 54.35 54.35 1,000.00 1,000.00 8,336.00 8,336.00 70.93 70.93 40.01 803.22 843.23 SWALE DEPOSIT FEE REFUND 1,000.00 Page: 2 vchlist 02/01/2013 2:26:38PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 3 Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor 28285 2/1/2013 003283 003283 WHITE, GEORGE 28286 2/1/2013 003286 WHITEWATER CREEK INC 28287 2/1/2013 003275 WRS ASSOCIATES 28288 2/1/2013 003285 YOUSEPH,CHRISTAN 131130032 1/31/2013 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 26 Vouchers for bank code: apbank 26 Vouchers in this report I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Mayor Date Council Member Date Invoice (Continued) 02-FSW219 00-FNA663 00-FNA752 99-FNA62 96-FNA28 9290200432 Fund/Dept 001.237.10.98 001.237.10.98 001.237.10.98 001.237.10.98 001237.10.98 001.016.000.521 Description/Account Amount Total : SWALE DEPOSIT FEE REFUND 1,000.00 1,000.00 Total : 1,000.00 SWALE DEPOSIT FEE REFUND SWALE DEPOSIT FEE REFUND SWALE DEPOSIT FEE REFUND Total : SWALE DEPOSIT FEE REFUND 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 3,000.00 1,000.00 Total : 1,000.00 LAW ENFORCEMENT:JANUARY Total : Bank total : 1,529,812.00 1,529,812.00 1,559,490.09 Total vouchers: 1,559,490.09 Page: 3 vchlist 02/07/2013 2:29:37PM Voucher List Page: 1 Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept Description/Account Amount 28289 2/7/2013 000193 NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC FEBRUARY 2012 001.090.000.518 CITY HALL RENT 1 Vouchers for bank code: apbank 1 Vouchers in this report I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been fumished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that 1 am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Mayor Date Council Member Date 39,566.35 Total : 39,566.35 Bank total : 39,566.35 Total vouchers: 39,566.35 Page: 1 vchlist 0210812013 11:32:22AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 1 Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor invoice 28290 2/8/2013 003076 AMSDEN, ERICA 28291 2/8/2013 003292 ANDERSON, LARI 28292 2/8/2013 001540 ARNOLD, DARLA 28293 2/8/2013 001012 ASSOC BUSINESS SYSTEMS 28294 2/8/2013 000277 AWC 28295 2/8/2013 000168 BLACK BOX NETWORK SVC 28296 2/8/2013 002562 CD'A METALS 28297 28298 2/8/2013 000101 CDW-G 2/8/2013 001888 COMCAST EXPENSE REFUND EXPENSE 612374 612464 1,031-38040 SPO-039763 553769 555294 555326 555930 W504754 W626841 W799722 W810664 FEBURARY 2013 28299 2/8/2013 001198 CONGRESS FOR THE NEW URBANISM 2013 Fund/Dept 001.032.000.543 001.090.000.367 001.032.000.543 001.013.015.515 001.058.050.558 001.011.000.511 001.090.000.518 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 001.090.001518 001.090.000.518 001.058.057.558 001.058.057.558 001.090.000.518 001.058.056.558 Description/Account Amount EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT:JAN Total : BOOTH REFUND FOR 10TH ANNIVI Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT:JAN Total : COPIER MAINT: LEGAL COPIER MAINT:CD Total : REGISTRATION AWC: ROD HIGGIN Total : PHONE SERVICE CALL SUPPLIES: PW SUPPLIES:PW SUPPLIES: PW SUPPLIES: PW HARDWARE: IT HARDWARE: IT HARDWARE: IT HARDWARE: IT Total Total : Total : HIGH SPEED INTERNET: CITY HAL Total : URBANIST MEMBERSHIP: KUHTA Total : 23.18 23.18 25.00 25.00 20.85 20.85 201.91 186.64 388.55 135.00 135.00 118.49 118.49 339.82 43.75 27.18 113.05 523.80 86.69 162.15 60.81 1,597.11 1,906.76 116.56 116.56 195.00 195.00 Page: 1 vchlist 02108/2013 11:32:22AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 2 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 28300 2/8/2013 001880 CROWN WEST REALTY LLC 28301 2/8/2013 003255 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS 28302 2/8/2013 002604 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC 28303 2/8/2013 000686 DEPT OF LICENSING 28304 2/8/2013 000278 DRISKELL,CARY 28305 2/8/2013 003274 EXCHANGE PUBLISHING 28306 2/8/2013 001232 FASTENAL CO 28307 2/8/2013 002507 FASTENERS, INC 28308 2/8/2013 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 28309 2/8/2013 000179 GFOA 28310 2/8/2013 001253 GORDON THOMAS HONEYWELL 28311 2/8/2013 000007 GRAINGER 30 548480 76379019 0046907 EXPENSE LD19089 IDLEW87142 S3526547.001 108799 39086 39130 39131 39132 01568060S JAN 131042 9047389284 Fund/Dept 101.042.000.543 101.042.000.543 001.090.000.548 001.032.000.543 001.013.015.515 001.090.010.513 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 001.090.010.513 001.032.000.543 001.013.000.513 001.013.000.513 001.058.056.558 001.018.014.514 001.011.000.511 101.042.000.542 Description/Account Amount COMMOM AREA MAINT CHARGE:11 Total : TOWER RENTAL: FEB 2013 Total : LEASE CONTRACT 001-8922117-00 Total : ENGINEERING LICENSE RENEWAL Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT:JAN Total : SEEKING RECYCLES ADS 2013 Total : Total : Total : SUPPLIES: PW SUPPLIES: PW 10 YEAR ANN IVERSARY ADVERTIE LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION RENEWAL FOR DUFFEY LOBBYIST SERVICES SUPPLIES: PW Total : Total : Total : 169.53 169.53 200.00 200.00 1,087.48 1,087.48 116.00 116.00 24.30 24.30 25.95 25.95 84.55 84.55 46.30 46.30 42.75 72.25 31.45 25.00 96.90 268.35 55.00 55.00 3,175.88 3,175.88 11.80 Page: 2 vchlist 02/08/2013 11:32:22AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 3 Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 28311 2/8/2013 000007 000007 GRAINGER 28312 2/8/2013 000917 GRAYBAR 28313 2/8/2013 001728 HP FINANCIAL SERVICES CO 28314 2/8/2013 002520 HUSKY INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 28315 2/8/2013 002538 HYDRAULICS PLUS, INC 28316 2/8/2013 002466 KENWORTH SALES 28317 2/8/2013 003185 LAMB, ERIK 28318 2/8/2013 001944 LANCER LTD 28319 2/8/2013 002552 MDM CONSTRUCTION, INC. 28320 2/8/2013 000788 MEDIA JOE, INC. 28321 2/8/2013 000435 NCW CHAPTER OF ICC 28322 2/8/2013 002709 NORTHWEST HOSE& FITTINGS 28323 2/8/2013 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. (Continued) 964577086 JANUARY 2013 78583 78860 16054 146083 EXPENSE 0431308 2054 3517 REGISTRATION REGISTRATION 2013 399666-001 640823000001 Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES: IT 001.090.000.548 101.000,000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 001.013.015.515 001.032.000.543 101.000.000.542 001.076.305.575 001.058.057.558 001.058.057.558 Total : Total : JANUARY 2013 LEASE PAYMENT Total : SUPPLIES: PW SUPPLIES: PW SUPPLIES: PW SUPPLIES: PW Total : Total : Total: EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT:JAN Total : TITLE PLATE: PW Total : ON-CALL ROAD GRADERS FOR SIs Total: SERVICE CALL FOR RACKS Total : REGISTRATION: POWELL REGISTRATION: GUERRY Total : 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW Total : 11.80 105.90 105.90 2,135.66 2,135.66 38.52 7.37 45.89 1,402.23 1,402.23 47.78 47.78 12.05 12.05 47.83 47.83 3,650.00 3,650.00 163.05 163.05 295.00 295.00 590.00 224.26 224.26 001.032.000.543 OFFICE SUPPLIES:PW 17.34 Page: 3 vchlist 02/08/2013 11:32:22AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 4 Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 28323 2/8/2013 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. (Continued) 641707859001 28324 2/8/2013 000058 O MA A500163 28325 2/8/2013 000881 OXARC 05851 SS 06088SS 28326 2/8/2013 000019 PURRFECT LOGOS, INC. 30655 28327 2/8/2013 002578 REBUILDING&HARDFACING INC 46520 28328 2/8/2013 002616 ROADWISE, INC 28329 2/8/2013 003133 SHAMROCK MANUFACTURING INC 28330 2/8/2013 002531 SIX ROBBLEES INC Fund/Dept 001.032.000.543 001.018.016.518 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 001,011.000.511 101.000.000.542 Description/Account Amount OFFICE SUPPLIES: PW 24.95 Total : 42.29 130.00 130.00 38.24 331.94 Total : 370.18 16.31 Total : 16.31 844.60 Total : 844.60 5,308.65 5,313.30 Total : 10,62195 3,318.28 Total : 3,318.28 24.11 205.83 122.60 24.10 Total : 376.64 2,784.30 Total: 2,784.30 80.00 80.00 2628 7.23 PHYSICAL EXAMS:NEW EMPLOYE Total : SUPPLIES: PW SUPPLIES: PW NAME PLATE: HIGGINS SUPPLIES: PW 54712 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 54713 101.000.000,542 SUPPLIES: PW 1462 101.042.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 5-658363-1 5-659036 5-659487 5-659487-1 28331 2/8/2013 002679 SPOKANE CO OFFICE OF FINANCIAL 934401525 28332 2/8/2013 002835 SPOKANE COURIER SERVICES LLC 3396 28333 2/8/2013 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 3192071718 3192071719 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000,000.542 001.016.000.521 001.011.000.511 001.011.000.511 001.011.000.511 SUPPLIES: PW SUPPLIES: PW SUPPLIES: PW SUPPLIES: PW SCSO IMPAIRED DRIVING BROADCASTING SERVICES:JANU Total : SUPPLIES:COUNCIL OFFICE SUPPLIESL COUNCIL Page: 4 vch l ist 02108/2013 11:32:22AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 5 Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 28333 2/8/2013 000065 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE (Continued) 28334 2/8/2013 003123 STOLTZ,ASHLEY EXPENSE 28335 2/8/2013 000419 SUMMIT LAW GROUP 60303 28336 2/8/2013 001250 SYTE NET SERVICES 7609 28337 2/8/2013 000335 TIRE-RAMA 8080021048 28338 2/8/2013 003291 TRANSPORTATION ISSUES DAILY 189 28339 2/8/2013 002597 TWISTED PAIR ENTERPRIZES L.L.0 10302013 28340 2/8/2013 000087 VERIZON WIRELESS 1156453986 6841679186 28341 2/8/2013 003175 VISIT SPOKANE 28342 2/8/2013 001090 WELLS FARGO-NW SIGNAL SUPPLY 28343 2/8/2013 002839 WIND WIRELESS INC. 28344 2/8/2013 003002 XO COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES 205130014 1/31/2013 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 5704 100026581 78149 0256712352 JANUARY 2013 Fund/Dept 001.013,015.515 001.018.016.518 001.090.000.518 001.032.000.543 001,032.000.543 001.011.000.511 101.042.000.542 101.042.000.542 001.090.000,558 101.042.000.542 101.042.000.542 001.076.305.575 001.016.000.554 Description/Account Amount Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT:JAN Total : PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSTALLATION FOR IT 53179D:OIL CHANGE Total : Total : Total : SUBSCRIPTION THROUGH NOV 3C Total : BROADCASTING COUNCIL MTGS:. Total: JAN 2013 VERIZON CELL PHONES JAN 2013 WIRELESS DATA CARDS Total : 2013-14 VISITOR GUIDE ADVERTIS Total : TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE ANAYLSIS Total : WIRELESS TELEPHONE/INTERNE1 Total : INTERNET/DATA LINES: FEBURARI Total : SPOKANE COUNTY SERVICES Total : 33,51 3.33 3.33 1,326.00 1,326.00 130.44 130.44 26.93 26.93 100.00 100.00 1,500.06 1,500.06 1,103.17 560.14 1,663.31 3,414.00 3,414.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 84.95 84.95 448.27 448.27 208,132.37 208,132.37 Page: vchlist 02/08/2013 11:32:22AM Voucher List Page: 6 Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 205130163 2/5/2013 002244 AOT PUBLIC SAFETY CORPORATION SPKVLY-37 001.016.000.521 CRYWOLF CHARGES: DECEMBER 4,996.41 Total : 4,996.41 57 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total : 260,087.11 57 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 260,087.11 1,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that 1 am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: 6 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 02/08/2013 2:16:24PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 4213 2/5/2013 000048 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS,401A PLAN Ben47900 001.231.14.00 401A:Payment 29,147.31 Total: 29,147.31 4214 2/5/2013 000682 EFTPS Ben47902 311.231.11.00 FEDERAL TAXES:Payment 32,547.74 Total: 32,547.74 4216 2/5/2013 000145 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS,457 PLF Ben47904 001.231.18.00 457 DEFERRED COMPENSATION:Payr 6,743.77 Total: 6,743.77 4217 2/5/2013 000162 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS,401A EXEC P1 Ben47906 001.231.14.00 401 EXEC PLAN:Payment 1,083.90 Total: 1,083.90 4227 2/5/2013 000682 EFTPS Ben47910 001.231.11.00 FEDERAL TAXES:Payment 734.64 Total: 734.64 28345 2/5/2013 000120 AWC Ben47890 001.231.16.00 HEALTH PLANS:Payment 105,253.77 Ben47908 001.231.16.00 HEALTH PLANS(COUNCIL):Payment 7,112.07 Total: 112,365.84 28346 2/5/2013 000165 DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS Ben47892 001.231.15.00 PERS:Payment 58,314.39 Total: 58,314.39 28347 2/5/2013 002227 IDAHO TAX COMMISSION Ben47894 001.231.50.03 IDAHO STATE TAX BASE:Payment 1,137.46 Total: 1,137.46 28348 2/5/2013 000699 WA COUNCIL CO/CITY EMPLOYEES Ben47896 001.231.21.00 UNION DUES:Payment 2,137.19 Total: 2,137.19 28349 2/5/2013 002574 WASHINGTON TRUST BANK Ben47898 001.23120.00 BERG20110-02-03952-4:Payment 881.79 Total: 881.79 10 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 245,094.03 10 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 245,094.03 Page: 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 02-19-2013 Department Director Approval : ❑ Item: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Payroll for Period Ending January 31, 2013 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Budget/Financial impacts: Employees Council Total Gross: $ 251,356.83 $ 4,725.00 $256,081.83 Benefits: $ 133,225.80 $ 7,616.69 $140,842.49 Total payroll $ 384,582.63 $ 12,341.69 $396,924.32 STAFF CONTACT: Raba Nimri DRAFT MINUTES City of Spokane Valley City Council Regular Meeting Formal Meeting Format Tuesday,January 22,2013 Deputy Mayor Schimmels called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Attendance: City Staff Gary Schimmels,Deputy Mayor Mike Jackson,City Manager Dean Grafos, Councilmember Cary Driskell,City Attorney Chuck Hafner, Councilmember John Hohman,Community Development Dir. Ben Wick, Councilmember Mike Stone,Parks&Rec Director Arne Woodard, Councilmember Mark Calhoun,Finance Director Eric Guth,Public Works Director Lori Barlow, Senior Planner ABSENT: Rick VanLeuven,Police Chief Tom Towey,Mayor Carolbelle Branch,Public Information Officer Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk INVOCATION: In the absence of a pastor, a few moments of silence were observed. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Deputy Mayor Schimmels led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present except Mayor Towey. It was moved by Councilmember Grafos, seconded and unanimously agreed to excuse Mayor Towey from tonight's meeting. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: It was moved by Councilmember Wick, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the agenda. INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: n/a COMMITTEE,BOARD,LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS: Councilmember Wick: reported that he attended a SNAP meeting where they are working on a strategic plan for the year; and last night he attended the "Meet and Greet" for the six fire chief finalists. Councilmember Grafos: said he attended the ITA (International Trade Alliance) Board of Directors meeting where they had a guest speaker from Washington State who discussed small business development. Councilmember Woodard: stated that he attended the design meeting at CenterPlace concerning the Sullivan Bridge; the HCDAC (House and Community Development Advisory Committee) Meeting concerning CDBG (Community Development Block Grant) funds; attended a vigil on Human Trafficking; a ribbon cutting for Independent Wealth; went to the Spokane Mortgage Lenders Association meeting; attended CenterPlace's open house; went to the Spokane City Forum where a chief economist from AVISTA spoke, and Mr. Woodard quoted some statistics gleaned from that meeting. Councilmember Hafner: attended the STA (Spokane Transit Authority) meeting, and said he is the Chair this year, that they discussed the increased ridership to Eastern; went to the CenterPlace bridge meeting; and attended the GMA (Growth Management Act)and Health District Meeting. Deputy Mayor Schimmels: said he attended the meeting at CenterPlace concerning the Sullivan Bridge; went to the STA Board meeting; an SRTC (Spokane Regional Transportation Council) meeting; and participated in the fire chief selection process. MAYOR'S REPORT: n/a Council Regular Meeting 01-22-2013 Page 1 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT PUBLIC COMMENTS: Deputy Mayor Schimmels invited public comment. 1. Robert Schrader, 414 S Pines Road, Travelon Motor Company: spoke concerning the sign ordinance; said the City's Code Enforcement officer told him he had to remove his signs, which are flat against his fence,or be subject to a fine;that if he removes the signs,they will lose revenue;that he wants to work on keeping the signs, doesn't want to pay the fines; said the signs are well maintained; and wants to work to change the ordinance. 2. Tara Self, 11809 East Sprague, Red Cup of Coffee: also spoke concerning the sign ordinance and her visit by a Code Compliance officer; when she removed the signs she said she experienced a 75% loss in revenue; and when the City allowed her to put the signs back up, revenues increased about 50%; said as an espresso establishment, she needs to be able to put up signs; and she asked if banners would be allowed to come back as they brought in more revenue. 3. Shawn Duncan, his family owns Dunk's Espresso across from Ziggy's [16919 E Sprague]: said they put up a reader board and experienced about a 40%increase in business;but saw over 50%decrease when they took it down; said they want to be treated fairly; that the auto part stores have large windows with large banners although they are only supposed to have one; that fast food restaurants also have big banners un each window; said his business should be treated the same as other businesses. 4. Dan Allison, 1203 N Warren Road: concerned that we have new SUV police cars from Wendell Ford with painted accessories put on in a downtown body shop; said they should be bought and outfitted in Spokane Valley; should also demand that for every vacant lot, a sign is posted of what the construction project is; said it would be great for citizens to know what's going on at every construction site. City Manager Jackson said that our City is under contract with the County for police enforcement and the County purchases the police vehicles.Mr.Allison remarked that we spend a lot of money with the County for police force, and that we should have some kind of say on how things happen. 5. Lynn Plaggemeier, 11708 E 19th: spoke about the crime rate in Spokane; said he belongs to an international/national travel club and is often asked if it is safe to come to this region; said concerning crime we're worse than Tacoma and Yakima; that a National Insurance Institute ranked us 5th in the nation for stolen vehicles; said citizens, schools and others need to start meeting to push to eliminate at least 90% of the crime which lends to bad PR for our region; said he doesn't recommend Spokane any more for businesses; said we need a focus group. 6. Inga Laurent, 3111 W 22nd, Spokane: said the City's sign brochure is helpful but a bigger program is signage that needs to be replaced and is in disrepair; signage on personal property should not be an issue; those who can afford to pay will and the small businesses that can't, don't have the same opportunity. 7. Tara Self, 11809 East Sprague, Red Cup of Coffee: said she tried to comply and got a quote for signs and the least expensive sign was over$7,000,with the most about$20,000; and said that is more than she paid for her business to begin with; that maybe the City could do something for new and/or smaller businesses. 1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. a.Approval of the following claim vouchers: VOUCHER LIST DATE VOUCHER NUMBERS; TOTAL AMOUNT 12/31/2012 27927 $105.00 12/31/2012 27928-27967; 1231120012 $1,987,717.66 01/02/2013 27968 $39,566.35 01/04/2013 27969-27982 $14,920.28 01/10/2013 27983-27998 $76,717.51 01/11/2013 27999-28068; 10547049; 104130016; 104130098 $328,736.62 01/11/2013 28069-28087 $114,942.58 01/11/2013 28088-28090 $435.00 01/15/2013 4186-4199; 28091-28096 $265,106.15 GRAND TOTAL $2,828,247.15 b.Approval of Payroll for period ending January 15,2013: $318,124.53 Council Regular Meeting 01-22-2013 Page 2 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT c.Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of January 8,2013,Formal Meeting Format d.Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of January 15,2013 Special Meeting e.Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of January 15,2013 Study Session Format It was moved by Councilmember Hafner, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the consent agenda. NEW BUSINESS: 2.First Reading Proposed Ordinance 13-001, CTA 04-12 Code Text Amendment—Lori Barlow After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Councilmember Woodard and seconded to advance ordinance 13-001 to a second reading. Senior Planner Barlow explained the proposed changes for this city-initiated text amendment. In response to a question from Council, she explained the difference between a manufactured home subdivision and a manufactured home park. City Manager Jackson said staff will work to edit the text for a second reading so that it will be more clear. Councilmember Woodard said he spoke to a home inspector for L&I (Labor and Industries) and confirmed there are no restrictions for moving a used home at any location. Deputy Mayor Schimmels invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried. 3.Motion Consideration: Street Preservation Project Change Order—Eric Guth It was moved by Councilmember Wick and seconded to approve Change Order 8 of the 2012 Street Preservation Project-Phase 1 with Spokane Rock Products, Inc., in the amount of$29,834.21 and to authorize the City Manager to execute the changer order to the construction contract. Public Works Director Guth mentioned that tonight's motion follows last week's staff report which explained the overruns. Deputy Mayor Schimmels invited public comment, and Mr. Lynn Plaggemeier,of 11708 E 19th Street, asked if this was due to a design deficiency or a modification. Mr. Guth said the change order is a change and not a modification; that staff measured and pays for only that which is put into the ground, that the project was a grind and overlay project; but that some modification was needed in the field. There were no further comments. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. 4.Motion Consideration: Memorandum of Understanding, Solid Waste—Mike Jackson It was moved by Councilmember Woodard and seconded, to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the `Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Spokane Valley, Washington, and the City of Spokane, Washington, and Spokane County, Washington, regarding regional solid waste management." City Manager Jackson gave a brief overview of the Memorandum, as noted on his Request for Council Action form,which included an explanation of the estimated cost; and said once this is approved by all parties, it would go out through County purchasing; and said that a final schedule should likely be available mid-summer. Deputy Mayor Schimmels invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation:In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Deputy Mayor Schimmels invited public comment;no comments were offered. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: 5.Advance Agenda—Mayor Towey/Deputy Mayor Schimmels Several suggestions for upcoming agenda items included hearing from Visit Spokane and others who receive funding from the City, a report from the police concerning crime, and an update on the code provisions concerning signage,based on tonight's comments. Mr. Jackson mentioned there will be a joint meeting with Spokane County February 6, to hear a presentation from the Department of Ecology concerning solid waste. Council Regular Meeting 01-22-2013 Page 3 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT INFORMATION ONLY The items (6) Coal Trains; (7) Department Reports; (8) Planning Commission Minutes of December 13, 2012, and (9) Park/Library Joint Site Development Plan were for information only and were not reported or discussed. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS City Manager Jackson stated that Council previously authorized him to finalize and execute the Animal Control Contract, and that after he had done so, he was contacted by Nancy Hill of SCRAPS, who told him that the afterhours drop-off of animals had been discontinued over a year ago, but that provision was still included in the contract. Mr. Jackson said he and County representatives initialed the deletion of that strike-thru language as the service was already discontinued, and the language inadvertently remained in the contract. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Councilmember Grafos, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 7:17 p.m. ATTEST: Thomas E.Towey,Mayor Christine Bainbridge,City Clerk Council Regular Meeting 01-22-2013 Page 4 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT MINUTES SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STUDY SESSION FORMAT Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers Spokane Valley,Washington January 29,2013 6:00 p.m. Attendance: Councilmembers Staff Tom Towey,Mayor Mike Jackson,City Manager Gary Schimmels,Deputy Mayor Cary Driskell,City Attorney Dean Grafos,Councilmember Mark Calhoun,Finance Director Chuck Hafner, Councilmember John Hohman, Community Development Dir. Ben Wick, Councilmember Mike Stone,Parks&Recreation Director Arne Woodard, Councilmember Steve Worley, Senior Engineer Morgan Koudelka, Sr.Administrative Analyst Rick VanLeuven,Police Chief Carolbelle Branch,Public Information Officer Chris Bainbridge,City Clerk Mayor Towey called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Roll Call: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Interlocal Agreement,Decant Facility—Steve Worley It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the "Interlocal Agreement GCB 1358 between WSDOT and the City of Spokane Valley for a Regional Decant Facility." Senior Engineer Worley explained that we have finalized the interlocal agreement with Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), and he went over the highlights of the agreement and noted the few minor changes, i.e. the new language about termination of the agreement and repayment of grant and city invested funds if that were to occur, that the numbering down the side of the pages will be removed, and the signature space will be modified to make it more conducive for actual signatures. Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation:In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried. NON-ACTION ITEMS 2.January Community Recognition—Mayor Towey Mayor Towey explained that our City is beginning its tenth-year and as part of that celebration, said he would like to recognize individuals, organizations and businesses that have made a positive impact on our community; and said he plans to make such a recognition once a month during a council meeting. Mayor Towey said that it is his hope that we get many recommendations as there are thousands of people who do great things in our community, and said he would like to recognize those efforts, present them with a certificate and a key to the city, and thank them for their contributions. Mayor Towey said that he is proud to announce the first recipient, JoAnn Dowling, nominated by Kim Johnson, who in making this nomination, explained that Mrs. Dowling "makes Spokane Valley a better place through her talent as an educator, her positive, encouraging spirit, and her zest for life."Mrs. Dowling expressed her appreciation for the honor and she received a round of applause from those in attendance. 3. Sewer Billings,Payments and Liens—Bruce Rawls, Spokane County Utilities Division Mr. Bruce Rawls, of the Spokane County Utilities Division, said that he gave this presentation to the Board of County Commissioners a few weeks ago, and that after speaking with City Manager Jackson, thought it would be beneficial to present to this Council as well. He gave an update on the sewer account Council Study Session Minutes 01-29-2013 Page 1 of 2 Approved by Council: DRAFT delinquencies and via his PowerPoint presentation, explained some of the recent problems on E-Bill accounts,went over the billing process, and discussed liens and proposed actions. Mr. Rawls said that as of December, the total past due balance is over $4 million, and that interest on delinquent payments amounts to approximately $350,000; he said the auditor's office must charge fees prescribed by law; and explained some of the cost associated with filing liens. In response to a question from Council concerning liens and foreclosure,Mr. Rawls said that their liens are superior to any lien by a bank doing a foreclosure. Mr. Rawls also asked how many sewer connections remain, and Mr. Rawls said they are down to about 4,000; and that out of about 42,000 total customers, most everyone should have sewer connection by 2015. Mr. Rawls said that this would be the first year to start foreclosures, and via the City Clerk,distributed a copy of a foreclosure warning form letter they send to delinquent accounts. 4. ESRI Interlocal Agreement(GIS Services)—Morgan Koudelka Senior Administrative Analyst Koudelka said that the City uses Geographic Information System (GIS) software for several purposes, such as electronic mapping,plotting, and measuring geographical data; that since 2005,the City has used a regional enterprise license agreement negotiated between Spokane County and Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (ESRI); which allows us to use GIS software licenses without the upfront purchase cost, and said we pay for only the amount of time the software is needed. Mr. Koudelka said the agreement also includes fees to online and in-person training and conferences; that this agreement would extend that arrangement for four years; that our cost is determined based upon the percentage of system licenses we use; and with cost changes for upcoming years;this would amount to an increase of less than $400 annually. Council concurred to have this brought to the February 5 council meeting for approval consideration. 5. Council Position#1 Candidate Interviews—Mayor Towey Mayor Towey explained the process for conducting the interviews; that 30 minutes will be allotted for each candidate, that each Councilmember will ask one question, and then proceed to the next councilmember for subsequent questions. Council interviewed Mr. Kevin Anderson, followed by Ms. Amy Biviano. After Ms. Biviano's interview, at approximately 7:34 p.m., Mayor Towey called for a short recess. Mayor Towey reconvened the meeting at 7:45 p.m., and Council then interviewed Mr. Rod Higgins, followed by Ms. Linda Thompson, then by Mr. Samuel Wood. At approximately 9:00 p.m., it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to extend the meeting for one hour. Mayor Towey thanked all the candidates for coming. 6.Advance Agenda—Mayor Towey. There were no suggestions for agenda items. 7. Greater Spokane, Inc., Quarterly Report—was for information only and was not reported or discussed. 8. Council Check-in—Mayor Towey.There were no council comments. 9. City Manager Comments—Mike Jackson City Manager Jackson said he wanted to update Council concerning the idea of sending the legislature a letter requesting they examine funding methods for transportation needs, and referenced a copy of the draft letter he distributed to Council previously. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 9:02 p.m. ATTEST: Thomas E.Towey,Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Council Study Session Minutes 01-29-2013 Page 2 of 2 Approved by Council: DRAFT MINUTES City of Spokane Valley City Council Special Meeting Tuesday,February 5,2013 Attendance: Councilmembers: Staff: Tom Towey,Mayor Mike Jackson,City Manager Gary Schimmels,Deputy Mayor Cary Driskell, City Attorney Dean Grafos, Councilmember Chuck Hafner, Councilmember Ben Wick, Councilmember Arne Woodard, Councilmember EXECUTIVE SESSION: Mayor Towey called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. I t was then moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn into executive session for approximately sixty minutes to evaluate the qualifications of candidates for appointment to elective office [RCW 42.30.110(1)(h)J, and that action is anticipated thereafter during the regular 6:00 p.m. council meeting. Council adjourned into executive session at approximately 5:02 p.m., Mayor Towey declared council out of executive session at 5:45 p.m., and it was then moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 5:45 p.m. Thomas E.Towey,Mayor ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Council Minutes:02-05-2013 Page 1 of 1 Approved by Council: DRAFT MINUTES SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STUDY SESSION FORMAT Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers Spokane Valley,Washington February 5,2013 6:00 p.m. Attendance: Councilmembers Staff Tom Towey,Mayor Mike Jackson,City Manager Gary Schimmels,Deputy Mayor Cary Driskell, City Attorney Dean Grafos,Councilmember Mark Calhoun,Finance Director Chuck Hafner, Councilmember John Hohman, Community Development Dir. Ben Wick, Councilmember Mike Stone,Parks&Recreation Director Arne Woodard, Councilmember Eric Guth,Public Works Director Morgan Koudelka, Sr.Administrative Analyst Rick VanLeuven,Police Chief Carolbelle Branch,Public Information Officer Chris Bainbridge,City Clerk Mayor Towey called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Roll Call: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the amended agenda. ACTION ITEMS: 1.Appointment of Candidate for Interim Council Position#1 —Mayor Towey After Mayor Towey explained the voting procedure, he opened the floor for nominations. Deputy Mayor Schimmels nominated Linda Thompson for the interim council position #1; the nomination was seconded. Councilmember Grafos nominated Rod Higgins;the nomination was seconded. There were no further nominations and Mayor Towey closed the nominations. A vote by a show of hands was taken three times with the following same outcome: voting for Linda Thompson were Mayor Towey, Deputy Mayor Schimmels, and Councilmember Wick; voting for Rod Higgins were Councilmembers Hafner, Grafos and Woodard. City Clerk Bainbridge then read the following section from the previously approved procedure: "In the event the City Council fails after three rounds to arrive at a majority vote for an applicant, then the City Manager shall flip a coin to determine who shall fill the vacancy, with the applicant whose last name is closest to the letter A being assigned"heads" and the other person assigned "tails." City Clerk Bainbridge stated that therefore if the coin shows "heads," the toss would go to Mr. Higgins, and if the coin shows "tails,"the toss would go to Ms. Thompson. With the City Clerk acting as a witness, City Manager Jackson flipped the coin, and it landed with "heads" facing up; indicating Rod Higgins as the new interim councilmember. City Clerk Bainbridge administered the Oath of Office to Mr. Higgins, he was congratulated by Councilmembers and others, and then took his seat at the dias. 2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 13-001 Code Text Amendment CTA 04-12—Marty Palaniuk After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to approve ordinance 13-001. Planning Technician Palaniuk explained that changes made since Council Study Session Minutes 02-05-2013 Page 1 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT the first reading included designating section 19.40.120 as Manufactured Homes on Individual Lots, instead of manufactured housing; and that although there were no changes, section 19.40.130 was included in the ordinance to show the difference between manufactured home parks, and manufactured homes on individual lots, such as in subdivisions. Mayor Towey invited public comments; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation:In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried. 3. ESRI Interlocal for GSI Services with Spokane County—Morgan Koudelka It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to authorize the City Manager to Finalize and Execute the "Interlocal Agreement for Participation by the City of Spokane, City of Spokane Valley, Spokane Regional Health District, and the Spokane Regional Transportation Council in the ESRI/Spokane County, Wa Reconsolidated Enterprise License Agreement No. 2004ESL6082 as Amended and Reconsolidated Pursuant to Amendment 7. "After Senior Administrative Analyst Koudelka explained the interlocal much the same as noted last week, Mayor Towey invited public comments. No comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation:In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried. NON-ACTION ITEMS: 4. 2013 Comprehensive Plan Docket—Mike Basinger Community Development Director Hohman said that staff is looking for feedback from Council as this issue is explained. Via his PowerPoint presentation, Senior Planner Basinger explained that two items on the 2013 Comprehensive Plan Docket include CPA 04-13,the re-evaluation of split land use designations, and CPA 05-13, potential modifications to Comprehensive Plan Map 2.1 to ensure there are sufficient locations for multifamily development. After Mr. Basinger explained each issue as noted on his February 5, 2013 Request for Council Action form, there were no objections from Council for staff to move forward on the Split Zoning issue as a future Code Text Amendment instead of a comp plan amendment, in order to add clarity in the Municipal Code; and for the milt-family zoning issue, to allow the market and private sector to propose new Multi-family areas, and to take those issues on a case-by-case basis. Mayor Towey called for a recess at 6:56 p.m., and reconvened the meeting at 7:10 p.m. 5. 2012 Accomplishments Report—Mike Jackson and Department Directors City Manager Jackson said that this report is the result of a lot of teamwork, and that teamwork is one of the reasons we get so much done with such a small staff. Mr. Jackson briefly went over the 2012 Budget Goals, and then discussed the Legislative and Executive Services,including approximate number of hours spent by Council in Regional Representation on various committees and boards; and mentioned the number of council meetings held, and resolutions and ordinances approved, and mentioned the number of public record requests handled by the City Clerk's office. City Manager Jackson went over the Council Budget goals for 2012, some of which included acquisition of park land adjacent to the Park Road Pool; placing the Sullivan Bridge replacement funding before the legislature once again in 2013; and creating an economic development plan including options for a new city hall. Mr. Jackson mentioned some of the completed projects, such as the Gateway Access Sign; and the interlocal agreements completed as we work with other agencies, such as the County to develop the Old Milwaukee right-of-way, and Spokane County Library District for a joint site development plan for land purchased for a park or other civic uses. Mr. Jackson mentioned the media campaign, the number of letters sent to new businesses, the City's online Citizen Action Request system, and the marketing and tourism support as well as other outreach projects such as the City Hall at the Mall, and the State of the City events. Human Resources (HR), he explained, falls under the Operations and Administrative Services,and Mr. Jackson went over some of the accomplishments associated with HR, such as the Well City Award, and lastly, Mr. Jackson went over some of the contract processes over the last year, such as animal control, prosecution services, criminal justice,and public safety. Council Study Session Minutes 02-05-2013 Page 2 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT Finance Director Calhoun discussed the accomplishments of his department, which included implementing State Auditor mandates and recommendations, and he highlighted many of the successes of the IT (Information Technology) staff including adding conference phone capabilities to City Council Chambers, and cost savings such as changing the City Hall Internet service and telephone service providers. Mr. Calhoun also noted his department worked with Public Works concerning fleet maintenance software; that hearing assistance equipment was acquired for CenterPlace; wireless audiovisual equipment was installed in the Opportunity Conference Room, and proudly stated that there were no system-wide outages during normal business hours in 2012. City Attorney Driskell discussed various projects his office has been working on, such as the Shoreline Master Program in conjunction with Community Development, analyzing the governance of solid waste management, participating in formulating a City Economic Development Plan; review of the current City Hall lease and space design, and the successful negotiation and competed agreements with such entities as Spokane Valley Fire Distinct, Spokane County Library District, Geiger Work crews, City of Millwood for the Argonne Road safety projects, Splashdown,and a review of approximately 190 general contracts for the City. Chief VanLeuven discussed some of his Department's accomplishments, such as Intelligence-Led Policing, Burglary and Vehicle Tasks Forces; implementation of their Lethality Assessment Program to help victims of domestic violence; implementation of programs such as Aggressive Driving, and Spokane Valley Traffic School; mentioned the success with their False Alarm Program, crime prevention outreach, and implementation of their professional standards software system which catalogs, stores, and tracks incidents. Community Development Director Hohman explained that the Community Development Department's accomplishments included implementation of the "Roadmap to Enhanced Permitting," several code amendments, modification of the permit center to improve efficiency; completed a mapping and hydrology study of the Forker Floodplain; reviewed the Saltese Flats Floodplain; and participated in the development of Regional Wellhead Protection regulations; his department also developed a Shoreline Master Program; participated in state-wide SEPA reform; completed the Annual Comprehensive Plan Update; and Conducted Planning Commission Training. Mr. Hohman stated that Code Compliance investigated 386 cases and closed 220 cases, and he shared some "before" and "after" photos of some of the properties addressed by Code Enforcement. Parks and Recreation Director Stone highlighted the accomplishments of his Department, including installation of a new playground at Terrace View Park; the completed south landscape project at CenterPlace; the administration of the West Entry Gateway Sign project; said they coordinated with hundreds of volunteers for the National Day of Service to complete improvements to Valley Mission and Appleway Trail;held the Grand Opening of Greenacres Park,worked with the County Library District for Sprague property acquisition; partnered with State Parks for Centennial Trail riverbank repair project; developed a walking trails map; coordinated with Valleyfest activities; renewed contracts with the Community Colleges for leased space in CenterPlace; purchased acoustical panels to improve sound in the Great Room; remodeled two small classrooms into one large room; held the first "Paws in the Pool" dog swim event; held the 4th annual Valley Mission Haunted Pool; offered free summer park programs and served over 1600 children; provided two free Saturday Outdoor Movies in the Park with over 1200 in attendance; with the Rotary Club,hosted and coordinated the "Breakfast with Santa" event; and partnered with Spokane Valley Partners,Liberty Lake and other ministries and schools to create the Spokane Valley Hunger and Homeless Network. Mr. Stone mentioned that the Senior Center is very active as they continue their emphasis on healthcare issues, as well emphasizing that they function as a place where seniors can go for friendship, fun and a sense of community. Public Works Director Guth went over some of his department's accomplishments, including snow removal statistics such as adding a ninth snow plow, responding to over 200 citizen requests, using over 126,000 gallons of deicer and 960 tons of granular deicer; that for street maintenance his department patched, repaired, sealed, upgraded and preserved miles of roadways using tons of materials; he listed Council Study Session Minutes 02-05-2013 Page 3 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT several major projects which have been completed, such as the Appleway between University and Dishman Mica,University from Appleway to Sprague,Farr Road from Appleway to Sprague, and Boone from Long to Greenacres. Mr. Guth said Geiger Work crews were of enormous assistance as they picked up over 48,000 pounds of garbage, mowed over 100 acres of dry land grass, and cleaned up and mowed the Appleway right-of-way. The Traffic Division, Mr. Guth explained, responded to over 160 citizen action requests; modified some of the signing and signals, and said that flashing school beacons were added to McDonald Elementary, and Evergreen, Bowdish and East Valley Middle schools; he said that division also added almost five miles of new bike lanes, installed signal coordination plans for the Sprague-Appleway couplet, as well as installed accessibility push buttons and audible and vibratory notification and countdown heads to Sprague and Adams. Mr. Guth said that his department designed and/or reviewed traffic control plans for sixteen projects; managed the design of Phase 1 Street Preservation; and that the stormwater utility section of his department included several retrofit, maintenance and/or other reconstruction projects; they responded to over 40 citizen requests involving flooding or drainage problems; and cleaned over 200 drywells, 1250 catchbasins, and almost 200 sidewalk curb inlets. The Public Works Department worked very hard to acquire grants, and Director Guth said they received $667,000 in grants for the Sprague Swales Projects, and $885,000 for the Regional Decant Facility; and that his department also developed an inspection-tracking database, completed the Valley Corridor environmental assessment, as well as the 2013-2018 Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan. As a recap, Mr. Guth highlighted several of the construction and design projects completed over the year. Councilmember Grafos asked about the status of the Mansfield Project, and Mr. Guth said a consultant has been hired to help with the real estate issue in obtaining right- of-way, that the project will be put out to bid with construction anticipated for the end of fall. Several councilmembers expressed thanks to all staff for their hard work. City Manager Jackson thanked the department heads and outstanding staff for a productive year; and Mayor Towey also extended his thanks, and commented that he feels this City has the best qualified staff in the State of Washington. 6.Advance Agenda—Mayor Towey Councilmember Woodard asked if we received any citizen calls concerning the rate increase of Waste Management. Mr. Jackson said we have received a few, and he asked Council to let him know if they get any calls, and said that per our Franchise agreement with Waste Management, rates are set by Waste Management and the Washington Utilities Commission. Mr. Jackson said that the agenda for tomorrow's joint meeting with Spokane County is a discussion by the Department of Ecology concerning solid waste. Mayor Towey reminded everyone that there is no council meeting next week as members of Council will be attending the Legislative Conference in Olympia. Councilmember Grafos said regarding road preservation,that he would like to take another look at where we are putting the emphasis on which projects; and suggested that some of the projects such as pavement management and swales could be done at the same time to save money. Mr. Jackson said that Public Works is putting that information together and we will be discussing these projects prior to paving; adding that a large portion of the Appleway project is actually landscaping. Councilmember Grafos again mentioned the idea of paving the auto row section and of putting parking on the south side of Sprague Avenue. Mr. Jackson said those issues can be re-visited, as parking on the south side was discussed previously and Council elected not to try to add that; and he asked if there were any objections to pulling out those issues for re-examination. Council had no objection. 7. Information Only: The (7a)Parks and Recreation Quarterly Report; and (b)Stormwater Projects were for information only and were not discussed or reported. 8. Council Check-in: Mayor Towey : There were no additional comments from Councilmembers. Council Study Session Minutes 02-05-2013 Page 4 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT 9. City Manager Comments—Mike Jackson City Manager Jackson mentioned the draft letters before Council concerning legislative issues, and there were no objections from Council to moving forward with both letters. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned 9:03 p.m. ATTEST: Thomas E.Towey,Mayor Christine Bainbridge,City Clerk Council Study Session Minutes 02-05-2013 Page 5 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT MINUTES Special Joint Meeting Spokane County Board of County Commissioners Spokane Valley City Council Wednesday,February 6,2013 9:00 a.m.—11:00 a.m. Spokane County Risk Management Office Conference Room 1033 West Gardner Avenue, Spokane,Wa Attendance: City of Spokane Valley Spokane County Tom Towey,Mayor Shelly O'Quinn, Chair Gary Schimmels,Deputy Mayor Al French,Vice-Chair Dean Grafos, Councilmember Todd Mielke, Commissioner Ben Wick, Councilmember Arne Woodard, Councilmember Absent: Chuck Hafner, Councilmember Rod Higgins, Councilmember Staff: Spokane County Staff Mike Jackson, City Manager Marshall Farnell, Chief Executive Officer Eric Guth,Public Works Director Jim Emacio,DPA,Prosecutor's Office Cary Driskell,City Attorney Ken Gimpel, Spokane Regional Solid Waste Erik Lamb,Deputy City Attorney Bill Wedlake, Spokane Regional Solid Waste Morgan Koudelka, Sr.Administrative Analyst Mike Stone,Parks&Recreation Director Others in Attendance: Mark Calhoun,Finance Director Jim Wavada,Environmental Planner,DOE Chris Bainbridge,City Clerk Wayne Krafft,DOE Regional Section Mgr Steve Salvatori, Spokane Council Member Doug Nixon, Cheney Councilmember Larry Condon,PacificClean Environmental Steve Wolf, Sunshine Disposal Recycling After self-introductions Jim Wavada, Environmental Planner with the Department of Ecology (DOE), gave the following presentation concerning Solid Waste: Mr. Wavada explained that we must be in compliance with state regulations for various options for future purposes concerning solid waste, and that today he will present an analysis of the options and the next steps. He said that as of midnight,November 16, 2014, the current plan will no longer be valid, and that the only option is to extend the agreement and keep the interlocal intact. RCW 70.95.010(6)(c) states that it is the responsibility of"county and city governments to assume primary responsibility for solid waste management and to develop and implement aggressive and effective waste reduction and source separation strategies." This means, he said,that each county, in cooperation with the cities, is required to prepare and coordinate a comprehensive solid waste management plan, and that according to RCW 70.95.08(1)(a-e), as of June 2010, plans must include a plan for handling methods for recyclable materials,including organics. Mr. Wavada said the Department of Ecology realizes this could take longer than November 2014, and a short-term fix would be to request DOE for a "Letter of Currency" which Joint Spokane County/Spokane Valley Meeting Minutes 02-06-2013 Page 1 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT would validate the permit and the municipalities would be approved to spend CPG (Coordinated Prevention Grant)funds. According to RCW 70.95.080(3),cities have three solid waste planning options: 1. Prepare and deliver to the county auditor of the county in which it [municipality] is located,its plan for its own solid waste management for integration into the county plan. The caveat is, to qualify for state financial assistance with planning costs, [RCW 70.95.130] "Any city preparing an independent plan shall provide for disposal sites wholly [emphasis added] within its jurisdiction." Mr. Wavada said most municipalities do not choose this option because the disposal site isn't within its jurisdiction,therefore the municipality would not be eligible for CPG grants nor qualify for State funding. 2. Enter into an agreement with the County pursuant to which the city shall participate in preparing a joint city-county plan for solid waste management. Mr. Wavada said this is the option most cities choose and he suggested entering into two interlocals: one to authorize the plan, and the second to explain the details; and when ready,jurisdictions/municipalities adopt the plan by a"Resolution of Adoption." 3. Authorize the County to prepare a plan for the city's solid waste management for inclusion in the comprehensive county plan. Mr. Wavada said that regardless of the options,the State statutes require that all solid waste plans contain a detailed list of plan elements and cover both short-term (5 years); and long-term (20)years. He said we are already at the five-year period. Mr. Wavada then gave some information comparing the options: that for option 1, Spokane County would be the lead planning and implementation authority for the countywide solid waste management. He said a new solid waste plan could cost between $80,000 and $150,000; new transfer stations between $1 million and $2 million, assuming you built your own; and new household hazardous waste facilities about $100,000 each. Option 2 includes a ten-year waste disposal contract for flow control, and planning requirements and responsibility remains with the County as lead, and cities select one of three options; that staffing and program operational costs may be shared based on which planning options the City of Spokane selects, and upon subsequent interlocal agreements; and said with this option, capital investment would be much smaller than with Option 1. Option 3 is the status quo for all planning functions; it keeps operational responsibility for everything except perhaps disposal, with the City of Spokane via an interlocal agreement, and it doesn't affect statutory responsibility for planning,just the approach to getting it done. In summary,Mr. Wavada said under any option, the County is responsible for writing a new comprehensive plan, and each jurisdiction must choose which way it will go to meet its obligation to participate; he also stated that the third option in terms of development, could be just as complicated as any of the other two; but that in terms of implementation, option 3 would be the lowest cost and the easiest to implement concerning legal agreements as there would be a single plan with one entity (the County) responsible for that plan's implementation; and that the jurisdictions would sign in via a resolution of adoption. Discussion and questions ensued concerning various aspects of the plan, and of solid waste in general. A concern was raised about the education aspect in the plan, and Mr. Wavada said we must address an education plan that meets the plan's expectations and with educating consumers,and said there are always options to consider when it comes to recycling. Commissioner French said he is aware of three agencies that work with recycling education; and suggested the [Washington State Department of Ecology] 1-800- recycle (1-800-732-9253) number as an aid, adding that it could be the element or education portion of a plan. Someone asked if a "blended plan" would be allowable where part could be sent to an incinerator and part to long-haul which would allow for adjustments in the volumes based on market conditions, and Mr. Wavada said that would be permissible. Someone stated that recycling varies as one week glass might be marketable, and the next not, so flexibility needs to be included in a Plan. Joint Spokane County/Spokane Valley Meeting Minutes 02-06-2013 Page 2 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT In response to a question from Commissioner O'Quinn concerning next steps. Commissioner French said that they have authorized for the issue of the RFQ(request for qualifications)to select a consultant to select the site selection process for trans-loaders; he said they also issued an RFQ for consultant help in reviewing the analysis between long-haul and incineration; he said those have been released and the due date for those coming back is the end of the month, after which they'll select a contactor and move forward to conduct that study; he said that at meetings between Spokane Valley,the County and the City of Spokane regarding the idea of whether there is an opportunity to acquire from the City of Spokane,the existing transfer stations in exchange for some kind of flow-control and some kind of volume that would go to the City; and he said those conversations will continue while we wait for the response to the RFQ. Commissioner O'Quinn commented about the option of looking at a public governmental nonprofit model; said she would compare such a model to the Spokane Regional Health District model; that it seems too often in these cases that the personalities or the politics of the different jurisdictions get in the way of the ability to act regionally as a community; and as in the Health District example, you take that factor out, and she asked how much, if at all, has that been discussed. Commissioner French said after conversations on that topic for two years, that that idea has been pretty much "beat to death;" that the majority of the jurisdictions reject that as an option; what they heard was that ultimately,jurisdictions were not happy with the government structure, or the voting structure; that some larger cities didn't like giving away that much power to include small cities; he said the interlocal was sent out to the jurisdictions asking that the document be signed, but no one returned a signed interlocal; he said they want accountability;they want to have control over the way the decisions are made and the only way that will happen is with the Board of County Commissioners he said there was a full year of conversation about governance and most feel more comfortable with the County doing it. Spokane Valley City Manager Jackson said he feels that is an accurate statement; adding that when we all met to discuss the next steps, it was decided by all that more information is needed; that part of the difficulty with the governing structure was they didn't know about landfill closures or potential capital costs to the City, and he said it could actually cost more for some cities if they entered into the agreement, so at that time,it was decided to move forward with the RFQ to get the information that everyone felt was needed; he said that last June unfortunately we didn't get any responses to the RFQ; and said we hope we get some good responses to the current RFQ; how much new information we'll learn is speculative he said; but we all need the information on the costs and the options for long haul or to continue for five to ten years with the existing system and then ultimately have the transfer station transferred either to the City and the County jointly, or the City of Spokane Valley or however those details get worked out. He said part of the RFQ includes options concerning the question of what do we do if we get to November 16,2014 and don't have everything in place, and said the candid discussion has been: "we'll find a way to make this work." Further discussion included mention that the change in the leadership of the City changed the dynamic of this topic whereby the City has decided they would be a stand-alone contractor as opposed to a previous inclination to be part of the alliance; but now that there is a clear understanding of what the City of Spokane will do with their incinerator, it allows the other jurisdictions to plan accordingly. Spokane City Council Member Salvatori said in speaking for one of the city council, he thinks it is a shared goal for waste-to-energy plans, to have it be a viable economic alternative to long-haul; and said the days of a $105 tipping fee are over; that ways have to be found where entities will choose to do business with it;that if people want a choice of what to do with garbage,"we need to burn" as if we don't burn,you don't have a choice as everyone would be long-hauling; and he said they are trying to bring the operating costs of that plant down so that they can be a vendor of choice on disposal methods. Regarding the transfer stations, he said his understanding is if you go the route of building new ones, he's pretty sure a transfer station has to go through the Essential Public Facility process, which he explained is an extensive process especially when on a deadline or even on an extended deadline; and said just speaking Joint Spokane County/Spokane Valley Meeting Minutes 02-06-2013 Page 3 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT for himself, he wants what brings us the lowest, most efficient rates for everyone; he said his opinion is that"you guys can collectively run those transfer stations better than we can, and you can drive costs out of that transfer station that we could never do— and he expressed hope to find some way without having to go to bond or anything else,to just do"x"number of years of flow control, get the transfer stations,we all have to work together on the plan; and said there's obviously over-lap on recycling and household hazardous materials; and said he hopes we all look at making this as simple and as efficient as possible. Council Member Salvatori said he thinks a nonprofit municipal corporation is just another layer and not something that would produce anything of value, and said that it is incumbent upon us to have a competitive alternative to long-haul. Other discussion involved the idea of regional or individually owned transfer stations, or sending everything to the waste-to-energy plant; and Commissioner O'Quinn asked if the City could contract out for these services and Mr.Wavada said no,that they could not take a job away from the union and turn it over to the private sector. Commissioner Mielke commented that he feels that none of these different elements are mandatorily tied together; that he doesn't see where the ultimate disposal decision is tied to the transfer stations; that in just looking at the transfer station piece, there are three options: one — go through the essential public facility process —we find a location —we build; or two —there's a purchase price offered by the City of Spokane and the price is with consideration of a flow control; and three -just the outright cost or asking price for purchase with no mandatory linkage between the flow control;he said he knows there is an appraisal out there and it is being reviewed; said he's trying to queue up each of those three options up so he can do a financial comparison, to purchase with consideration, purchase without consideration,or a different consideration,but that he's not able to run those numbers until he has those figures from the City of Spokane on the outright purchase. Spokane City Council Member Salvatori commented that he doesn't think anyone here has an outcome that they are bound to as everyone seeks what is best for their constituents, understanding that each jurisdiction's constituents has different needs; that if their needs and a regional need makes sense, then good; and if they don't, then that is what he likes about option three as each jurisdiction will have the ability to develop their own plan; he said at the time of last year's summit,the County's position was that they want this to be regional and were willing to turn over all governance to a separately appointed independent body that the County had no control over; he said the starting conversation was everyone wanted to be part of the governance, but that wasn't where the conversation ended. Mr. Salvatori said he doesn't think the Board's position has changed from where it was two years ago, and said he is still open to all options until all the necessary information has been obtained to make a decision. Commissioner Mielke replied that while it is important to recognize differences of constituents and their expectations,he is also hopeful as elected officials they will look for the commonality as well. Mr. Gimpel said it appears they have even moved this just to two options: the transfer of the assets, the transfer stations, in return for a disposal agreement for a period of time; or a cashed-out option to acquire those facilities; that the more tons there are, the more leverage and options there will be in pricing models; he said there's about 150,000 tons in the county, and about 150,000 that come to the waste-to- energy plant direct, and if we keep those tons together, as a region it will give us better leverage with whatever option is chosen. Commissioner Mielke said he understands the issue of volume, but that he also understands the idea of trying to diversify risks; which he said, is the balancing act; he said if he signs a long-term contract, he'd be at its whim for the period of that contract; he said he hopes no one takes this as directed at personalities, but in looking at the objectives, he wants the most cost effective, responsible way of disposing solid waste; that under the previous discussions where the projections were $142, at that point the County was saying "I'm not sure we're meeting our objective; we think there are other responsible ways of getting rid of solid waste at a lower cost." He said the concern he has with dedicating every bit of their flow to a long-haul option is that he has no idea what fuel prices will do over an extended period of time; and if he signs a long-term agreement on that,then he may be at the whim of Joint Spokane County/Spokane Valley Meeting Minutes 02-06-2013 Page 4 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT fuel prices. City Councilmember Grafos stated if Spokane is going to be a contractor,they need to tell us; give us a five-year horizon for the other municipalities to decide on an option; he said they can't come back and say we need a thirty-year contract; that if they can run that plant and they can be a contractor, then give us a number for five years; but whatever system is decided upon,we should have the option of changing and going out to the market every five years. Commissioner French said he feels the City is giving us a target,or a soft number of$65 a ton for just disposal subject to their calculations they are still working on; and that is more than what we had a few months ago. Council Member Salvatori said that one way to help mitigate that is to shorten the duration,not thirty or twenty years,but maybe ten years or less; that from the City's standpoint, he hopes we are talking ten because we can transfer title to the transfer stations with ten years of flow at zero costs; in round numbers, he said he is not designated to negotiate,but in round numbers,you can end up with the transfer stations with no cash if we had ten years of flow, and that could be subject to other negotiations; that we'll have a better operation of a waste-to- energy plant if there are choices of where to put your trash; and said the best way for me to bring value to my voters in the city, is to make us have to compete to keep your business; he said we should work together on planning,you run the transfer stations; we need to be competitive, and said he'd hate to see a bond issue required to go buy a transfer station when we'll give them to you. Mr. Gimpel said that the Board of County Commissioners just approved the tip fee reduction proposal rolling back the cost to $9 per ton starting May 1 if the City Council approves it next Monday night for final reading; therefore for the next two years that rate will simply be adjusted by a CPI(consumer price index) so there won't be an unknown for the short term. Appreciation was extended to everyone for attending today's meeting. The meeting adjourned at approximately 10:35 a.m. ATTEST: Thomas E.Towey,Mayor Christine Bainbridge,City Clerk Joint Spokane County/Spokane Valley Meeting Minutes 02-06-2013 Page 5 of 5 Approved by Council: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: February 19, 2013 Department Director Approval: ❑ Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: February Community Recognition GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: At the January 15, 2013, Council meeting, Mayor Towey mentioned the selection process for the Community Recognition Program and said that the first presentation would be January 29; with the 5th of the month as the cutoff for the next and subsequent month's nominations. BACKGROUND: As part of our ten-year anniversary celebrations in 2013, the City of Spokane Valley wants to recognize those individuals, organizations and businesses in Spokane Valley that have made our community a better place. Throughout the anniversary year, Mayor Towey and members of the Spokane Valley City Council will honor individuals, organizations and businesses that have had positive impacts on our community. Those selected for recognition will be honored at a City Council meeting and presented with a Key to the City, and a commemorating certificate. OPTIONS: n/a RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Mayor Towey will present the Key to the City and a commemorating certificate to his choice from among those nominated. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF/COUNCIL CONTACT: Mayor Towey ATTACHMENTS: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: February 19, 2013 Department Director Approval: ❑ Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: SNAP Request for Letter of Support GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: SNAP CEO Julie Honekamp, along with Capital Campaign Co-Chair Mark McCabe will present an overview of their nonprofit agency, which has been helping low-income and vulnerable residents throughout Spokane County for the past forty-seven years. SNAP provides support through nearly thirty programs in areas such as energy assistance, foreclosure prevention, weatherization, and small business loans, and SNAP has had a presence at Spokane Valley Partners for many years with an energy assistance office. Ms. Honekamp will provide a brief description of SNAP's historic first, capital campaign, which is an effort to purchase the former site of the Dominican Center on Ft. Wright Drive near Spokane Falls Community College. As part of this campaign, SNAP is requesting a letter of support from the Spokane Valley City Council on behalf of SNAP's $638,000 grant application to the State Building Community Fund, which request will be considered during the current legislative session in Olympia. OPTIONS: Council discretion. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Council discretion. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF/COUNCIL CONTACT: Councilmember Ben Wick ATTACHMENTS: Draft Sample Letter DRAFT Dear Legislator: We acknowledge and appreciate SNAP's efforts as our region's community action agency. As the City of Spokane Valley's elected officials, we know that if one of our citizens has trouble paying a light bill, SNAP Energy Assistance will be there to help; when a family is in danger of losing their home, a SNAP housing counselor will answer the call, or when an aspiring entrepreneur needs a loan and mentoring to get off the ground, SNAP Financial Access will respond with resources and guidance. For the past 47 years, SNAP has earned its reputation as a nonprofit that helps people realize their potential by blending finaueL41 assistance with an array of valuable educational programs. While the agency offers a safety net in difficult times, it also acts as a reliable springboard to self-sufficiency. We value SNAP's commitment to making our community a more secure place to live, work and raise a family. The agency has a presence in our city at the Spokane Valley Partners office on Broadway and through programs that support our residents in areas like foreclosure prevention, weatherization, minor home repair, energy assistance, securing affordable housing and more. We know their efforts make a very real and lasting impact in our city and beyond. Now, for the first time in its history, SNAP has launched a capital campaign with the goal of purchasing the former site of the Dominican Center off Ft. George Wright Drive in northwest Spokane. The purchase of this facility, built in 1968 for the Dominican Order of Nuns, will provide a home for over 60 SNAP employees as well as Transitions, a separate nonprofit which helps homeless women with employment training and life skills. In its entire history, SNAP has never owned its own administrative home. Along with a significant savings in operational costs each year, the agency's move to the Ft. Wright campus will provide the area with an additional community hub that can be utilized by a variety of nonprofit groups. The Ft Wright building also hosts a steady schedule of educational events in areas like money management, microenterprise training, homebuyer awareness and more — again, all with the goal of helping people achieve self-reliance. We add our support of SNAP's capital campaign and urge you to do the same by supporting the agency's grant application to the Department of Commerce Building Communities Fund during this legislative session. The requested funds are a critical component in the overall effort to purchase the building and surrounding property by the deadline of Nov. 1, 2013. We feel confident that SNAP is doing its part to generate the balance of funds through an ambitious community campaign, loans, grants, funding of its own, and sale of a portion of the property. We genuinely appreciate your consideration of this matter and look forward to SNAP securing a home that it can call its own. Sincerely, Thomas T. Towey, Mayor On behalf of Spokane Valley City Council CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: February 19, 2013 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. Report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Draft Amended 2013 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adopted the 2013-2018 Six Year TIP on June 26, 2012, Resolution #12-003; Approved on July 10, 2012 a list of projects for federal grant applications through SRTC; Approved list of projects for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) applications on October 23, 2012; Approved list of projects for the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant applications on August 9th, 2011. BACKGROUND: Council adopted the 2013-2018 TIP based upon information staff had at that time relative to available funds and how these funds could be utilized for transportation projects. Since the adoption of the 2013-2018 TIP, staff submitted applications for federal STP Call for Projects and a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) for the following projects that were selected for funding: • Adams St Resurfacing - Sprague to 4th Ave (CDBG) • Pines (SR-27) / Grace Intersection Safety Project (HSIP) • Citywide Safety Improvements (HSIP) (Bike and Pedestrian safety upgrades) • Argonne-Mullan Safety Project— Indiana to Broadway (HSIP) (Signal, Bike upgrades) • Argonne Corridor Safety Project— Empire to Knox (HSIP) (Signal, Bike upgrades) • Argonne Rd Resurfacing Project—Sprague to Broadway (STP(U)) • Sprague Ave Resurfacing Project— Herald to University (STP(U)) • Sprague Ave Curb Ramp ADA Improvements — Fancher to Havana (CDBG, Only ADA ramp portion of street resurfacing project was funded) Additional proposed changes identified in the Amended 2013 TIP include the following: Removed projects: • Sidewalk & Transit Stop Accessibility • Park Road Project 2 (RW/CN Only) — Broadway to Indiana • Park Road #1 Sidewalk Project - Sinto Ave - Indiana Ave • Park Road #2 Sidewalk Project— Marietta to Buckeye Carryover projects from 2012: • Pines/Mansfield (Railroad Crossing Improvements) • Pines Corridor ITS • Sprague/Sullivan ITS • Sullivan/Euclid PCC Intersection • Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan PCC Intersections • Sullivan Bridge Drain Retrofit • Sprague Ave Swale Project Other projects approved by Council: • 2013 Street Preservation Projects Based on this information, it is recommended that the 2013 TIP be amended to reflect the deletion of the projects that did not receive funding, include those projects that were not completed in 2012 and have carried over to the 2013 construction season, and those projects added to the 2013 construction season. Attached is a summary of the proposed changes. A public hearing on these changes to the 2013 TIP is currently scheduled for March 12, 2013. Adoption of the Amended 2013 TIP is currently scheduled for March 26, 2013. OPTIONS: Discussion RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The projects costs shown in the draft Amended 2013 TIP are preliminary and may be adjusted prior to adoption to reflect 2012 year-end adjustments. There are sufficient capital project funds to cover the local match for these projects. STAFF CONTACT: Steve Worley, Senior Capital Projects Engineer Eric Guth, Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: Draft Amended 2013 TIP City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Adopted 2013 Transportation Improvement Program Primary City Total 2013 Proj.# Project From To Source Amount Project Costs 1 0060 Argonne Road Corridor Improvements 1-90 Trent CMAQ $ 120,000 $ 882,000 2 0123 Mission Ave Improvement Project(PE/RW Only) Flora Barker STP(U) $ 89,000 $ 659,000 3 0149 Sidewalk InfiII Project Various locations CMAQ $ 65,000 $ 324,000 4 0155 Sullivan West Bridge#4508 Sullivan @Spokane River BR $ 242,000 $ 1,208,000 5 0146 24th Avenue Sidewalk Project Adams Sullivan TIB-USP $ 132,000 $ 258,000 6 0156 Mansfield Ave Connection Project(PE/RW Only) Pines(SR 27) Houk St. CMAQ $ 61,000 $ 1,541,000 7 0154 Sidewalk&Transit Stop Accessibility Various locations FTA $ 22,000 $ 111,000 8 0145 Spokane Valley-Millwood Trail(PE Only) SCC Valley Mall STP(E) $ - $ 559,000 9 Sullivan Rd/UPRR Overpass Bridge Resurfacing Sullivan @UPRR Overpass BR $ 92,000 $ 461,000 10 0159 University Rd/1-90 Overpass Study University 1-90 CMAQ $ 26,000 $ 188,000 11 0168 Wellesley Ave/Adams Rd. Sidewalk project Sullivan/Trent Isenhart/Wellesley SRTS $ 2,000 $ 570,000 12 0069 Park Road Project 2(RW/CN Only) Broadway Indiana STP(U) $ 20,000 $ 150,000 13 Park Road#1 Sidewalk Project Sinto Ave Indiana Ave SRTS $ 2,000 $ 49,000 14 Park Road#2 Sidewalk Project Marietta Buckeye SRTS $ 1,000 $ 23,000 15 Sprague Avenue Resurfacing Project Fancher Dollar STP(U) $ 249,000 $ 249,000 16 Sprague Avenue Resurfacing Project(EB Lanes) Havana Fancher STP(U) $ 500,000 $ 500,000 17 Sullivan/Euclid Concrete Intersection(RW/CN) Sullivan Euclid STP(U) $ 211,000 $ 1,562,000 18 0177 Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study 1-90 Wellesley STP(U) $ 27,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,861,000 $ 9,494,000 Funded Projects Added Projects Planned Projects City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works DRAFT-AMENDED 2013 Transportation Improvement Program Resolution 13-_,( ,2013) Primary City Total 2013 Proj.# Project From To Source Amount Project Costs 1 0005 Pines/Mansfield Montgomery Pines(SR-27) City-303 $ 463,000 $ 463,000 2 0060 Argonne Road Corridor Improvements 1-90 Trent CMAQ $ 120,000 $ 882,000 3 0061 Pines Corridor ITS Sprague Trent CMAQ $ 376,340 $ 1,881,700 4 0123 Mission Ave Improvement Project(PE/RW Only) Flora Barker STP(U) $ 69,900 $ 514,900 5 0133 Sprague/Sullivan ITS Sprague Sullivan/1-90 CMAQ $ 58,950 $ 294,750 6 0141 Sullivan/Euclid PCC Intersection(PE/RW only) Sullivan Euclid STP(U) $ 19,150 $ 142,000 7 0142 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan PCC Intersections(PE/RW only) Broadway @Argonne/Mullan STP(U) $ 31,580 $ 233,950 8 0145 Spokane Valley-Millwood Trail(PE Only) SCC Valley Mall STP(E) $ - $ 559,000 9 0146 24th Avenue Sidewalk Project Adams Sullivan TIB-USP $ 128,000 $ 250,000 10 0149 Sidewalk Infi11 Project Various locations CMAQ $ 150,000 $ 425,250 11 0150 Sullivan Bridge Drain Retrofit Sullivan Bridge southbound DOE $ 71,950 $ 287,800 12 0155 Sullivan West Bridge#4508 Sullivan @Spokane River BR $ 168,000 $ 840,000 13 0156 Mansfield Ave Connection Project Pines(SR 27) Houk St. CMAQ $ 137,190 $ 1,960,000 14 0159 University Rd/1-90 Overpass Study University 1-90 CMAQ $ 33,700 $ 249,700 15 0163 Sprague Ave Swale Upgrade Park Rd. 1-90 DOE $ 142,000 $ 379,200 16 0166 Pines(SR-27)/Grace Intersection Safety Project Pines(SR 27)@ Grace Ave HSIP $ - $ 100,200 17 0167 Citywide Safety Improvements(Bike/Ped.) Various locations HSIP $ 42,170 $ 47,170 18 0168 Wellesley Ave/Adams Rd. Sidewalk project Sullivan/Trent Isenhart/Wellesley SRTS $ 2,000 $ 570,000 19 0169 Argonne-Mullan Safety Project(Signal/Bike Upgrades) Indiana Broadway HSIP $ - $ 9,720 20 0170 Argonne Rd Corridor Safety Project(Signal/Bike Upgrades) Empire Knox HSIP $ - $ 15,710 21 0171 Sprague Avenue Curb Ramp ADA Improvements Fancher Havana CDBG $ 13,890 $ 129,300 22 0174 2013 Street Preservation Project Various locations City $ 1,862,400 $ 1,862,400 23 -Argonne Rd Resurfacing Project Sprague Broadway STP(U) $ 49,275 $ 365,000 24 -Sprague Avenue Resurfacing Project Fancher Thierman STP(U) $ 48,600 $ 360,000 25 -Sprague Avenue Resurfacing Project Herald University STP(U) $ 56,025 $ 415,000 26 -Sprague Avenue Resurfacing Project(EB Lanes) Havana Fancher STP(U) $ 83,700 $ 620,000 27 0175 Sullivan Rd/UPRR Overpass Bridge Resurfacing Sullivan @UPRR Overpass BR $ - $ 286,140 28 0176 Appleway Trail University Evergreen City-303 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 29 0177 Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study 1-90 Wellesley STP(U) $ 27,000 $ 200,000 $ 4,304,820 $ 14,493,890 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances,and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Funded Projects Added Projects 2012 Carry Over Projects P:\Public Works\Capital Projects\CIP-TIP Funding\2013-2018 TIP\Amended 2013 TIP\Amended 2013 TIP.xlsx 2/11/2013 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: February 19, 2013 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Park/Library Joint Site Development Plan Consultant Selection Update GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: The City Council approved the purchase of the Sprague property on October 31, 2012. BACKGROUND: As Council is aware, staff is working on a joint site development plan with the Library District. Per Agreement, the City will pay for 50% of the plan. These funds were not appropriated in the 2013 Budget. The City will soon need to commit to expenditures for the plan. Staff is seeking consensus to expend funds and add this item to the 2013 Budget Amendment. As per our Interlocal Agreement, both the City and the Spokane County Library District have one year following the Closing, to develop a joint site plan for this project. Staff developed a Request for Qualifications for this project that was advertised in December 2012. Submittals were due December 17, 2012 and we received submittals from 15 consultant teams. A selection committee was formed made up of three representatives from the Library District and three representatives from the City. The selection committee met and developed a short- list of five consultant teams to interview. Interviews of these five short-listed consultant teams were conducted on January 29, 2013. Staff will be providing an update of this process on February 19 to the City Council. This update will include the name of the selected consultant team, an explanation of the scope of work and the proposed contract fee. The Library District Board will be discussing the proposed contract at their February 19 meeting as well. OPTIONS: Council discretion RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: City Council Consensus to proceed with expenditures within the City Manager's Authority. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Funds for the site plan were not included in the 2013 budget and later in the year the Finance Director will bring forth a budget amendment for Council approval consideration. STAFF CONTACT: Michael D. Stone, CPRP. Director of Parks and Recreation ATTACHMENTS: None CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: February 19, 2013 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. Report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed Intergovernmental Purchasing Contract with the Washington State General Administration Office. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Chapter 39.34 RCW PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: N/A BACKGROUND: The City is authorized under state law to utilize the purchasing contracts of other jurisdictions in the state by following certain rules. This is commonly referred to as "piggybacking" on the contract of the other entity. One of the requirements is the adoption of an interlocal agreement by both entities which provides such authority. This proposed interlocal agreement meets that requirement. There are other requirements specific to each piggybacked purchasing event. Staff is proposing this interlocal purchasing agreement with the State of Washington — General Administration Office (GAO) so the City can purchase various items, including miscellaneous equipment and goods for Public Works, and IT equipment. Items purchased through this contract are generally expected to be below normal retail pricing. The authority requested by staff for this interlocal purchasing agreement is different than other interlocal purchasing agreements. When staff received the proposed purchasing agreement in 2011, it appeared it was something staff could execute on behalf of the City. That was not the case, and we now know that Council must take action to authorize execution. The City can legally remedy this oversight by gaining Council ratification of the prior staff action, which gives approval after the fact for prior purchases. Additionally, the GAO has requested that we execute an amendment to the agreement which extends the agreement to June 30, 2013. If we want to be part of this cooperative beyond that date, we would present a new interlocal purchasing agreement for Council consideration. OPTIONS: (1) Ratify the prior staff action regarding authorizing the Washington State — GAO interlocal purchasing agreement and authorize finalizing and executing the 6 month extension; (2) request further information. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Place on future consent agenda for motion consideration to ratify the prior staff action regarding authorizing the Washington State — GAO interlocal purchasing agreement, including Amendment #1, and authorizing staff to execute Amendment #2 extending the agreement to June 30, 2013. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: $2,000 for one year, $1,000 for six month extension in 2013. STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney ATTACHMENTS: State of Washington Intergovernmental Agreement for State Purchasing Cooperative, including amendments one and two. r ,(17.4'0„,i t 44 l!R State of Washington DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL ADMINISTRATION Office of State Procurement Rm.201 General Administration Building, P.O. Box 41017 Olympia,Washington 98504-1017 (360)902-7400 http:/Iwww.ga.wa.gov STATE OF WASHINGTON INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR STATE PURCHASING COOPERATIVE Pursuant to Chapter 43.19 RCW,Chapter 3924 RCW and WAG 236.49-060,the State of Washington,Department of General Administration,Office of State Procurement,("Office of State Procurement"or°OSP"),and City of Spokane Valley 'Cooperative Member)agree to enter Into this Intergovernmental Agreement("Agreement"),for the purpose of the Cooperative Member participating in the State Purchasing Cooperative Program("Cooperative")under the following terms and conditions: 1) Washington State political subdivisions(e.g.local governments and school districts)and public benefit nonprofit corporations are eligible for membership in the Cooperative and must be subject to audit by Washington State Auditor's Office(SAO).Offices,departments,divisions,or other sub-units("subdivisions") within Washington State political subdivisions and public benefit nonprofit corporations may join the Cooperative. However,the subdivision's membership fee will be assessed at the rate of the associated Washington State political subdivision or public benefit nonprofit corporations.Washington state agencies and their subdivisions are automatically Cooperative Members and do not need to apply for membership or pay a membership fee. 2) The Office of State Procurement Is required to recover the costs of administering the State Purchasing Cooperative Program from Cooperative Members. The Membership Fee Schedule below sets forth the fee structure for Cooperative Members,which are not Washington State agencies. The Membership Fee Schedule is based on the Cooperative Member's total expenditures,less debt service and inter-fund transfers,as reported in the Cooperative Member's last audited financial statement. 3) The term of this Agreement and Cooperative membership is January 1,2010 through December 31,2011. This Agreement may be canceled in writing by either party.However;if the Cooperative Member has used state contracts during the current membership period;the Cooperative Member remains liable to pay any unpaid balance of the membership fee for the entire term. Fees are not based on the level of contract usage. Refunds will not be given to members due to lack of contract usage. 4) The Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction(OSPI)financial reporting information will be used to verify fee amounts for public school districts,and Educational Service Districts,(ESD's). 6) Any Cooperative Member not reported in the OSPt or State Auditor's financial reporting information,must submit a copy of its most recent audited financial statements to OSP upon request.When a Cooperative Member does not have audited financial statements,the Cooperative Member shall provide internal budgets or financial statements.Once membership fees are verified through such authoritative sources,OSP will issue quarterly invoices for remittance due and payable within 30 days of receipt or due date shown on invoice whichever is sooner.After initial verification and at the beginning of each calendar quarter thereafter, invoices will be sent via electronic mail to the contact listed betow. 6) This executed Agreement entitles the Cooperative Member access to state contracts for goods and services as viewed on www.ga.wa.gov.Cooperative Members may only access Western States Contracting Alliance (WSCA)contracts where Washington is the lead state,or has a signed a participating addendum(PA). Cooperative Members are not authorized to enter into separate WSCA participating addenda with vendors. Cooperative Members are also entitled to use Oregon Purchasing Contracts, 2 of 4 • Y • 7) If a Washington State political subdivision or public benefit nonprofit corporation or a subdivision thereof that Is not a current Cooperative Member Is found to have used a state contract,WSCA contract,or Oregon Purchasing Contract;that Washington State political subdivision or public benefit nonprofit corporation shall be liable for payment of a full year membership fee. Failure to pay such fee may be reported to the State Auditor's Office and result in audit findings against the entity. 8) The Office of State Procurement,in contracting on behalf of the State of Washington for the purchase of goods and services according to the laws and regulations governing such purchases,agrees to also contract on behalf of the Cooperative Member,to the extent permitted by law. The Cooperative Member accepts responsibility for compliance with any additional laws and regulations applicable to the Cooperative Member. 9) The Office of State Procurement agrees to comply with its statutory requirements regarding notice for bids or proposals for goods or services subject to this Agreement,and will either:a)post the bid or solicitation notice on a web site established and maintained by OSP for the purposes of posting public notice of bid or proposal solicitations,or b)provide an access link on the State of Washington's web portal to the notice. 10) When the Office of the State Procurement has entered into a contractual agreement for the purchase of goods or services on behalf of Cooperative Member,the Cooperative Member may purchase goods and services covered by the contract on the same terms and conditions as the State of Washington,except that the contractor has the right to modify payment terms based on Its credit assessment of the Cooperative Member.Purchases by the Cooperative Member may be made by a purchase order Issued by the Cooperative Member to the contractor. The Cooperative Member is solely responsible for payment for any goods and services it purchases under contracts pursuant to this Agreement or services it purchases directly from OSP. The Cooperative Member agrees to be responsible for limited contract monitoring related to their use of these contracts. 11) The Cooperative Member reserves the right to contract independently for the purchase of any particular class of goods or services,with or without notice being given to OSP. 12) In the event that either the Office of the State Procurement or the Cooperative Member Is abolished,this Agreement shall continue in operation as to any entity succeeding to the powers and duties of the abolished party,except as canceled or modified by operation of law. 13) The Cooperative Member agrees to use only those OSP,WSCA,or Oregon Purchasing contracts authorized under the terms of this Agreement and to comply with those contracts'terms and conditions. The Cooperative Member further agrees that ail purchases from OSP,WSCA,or Oregon Purchasing contracts will be made only for the direct use of the Cooperative Member's programs and no purchases will be made on behalf of or for the use of other entities or jurisdictions. 14) It Is not the intention of the parties,nor shall this Agreement be Interpreted,to create a separate legal entity for the performance of this Agreement. Instead,the Office of State Procurement shall be responsible for administering this Agreement. 1 6) in accordance with RCW 39.34.040;the Cooperative Member shall be responsible for filing the executed copy of this Agreement with its county auditor's office,or filed in such manner as required by law,to meet public disclosure requirements.This may Include listing on the Cooperative Member's Internet site or any other electronically retrievable public source. 16) By Its signature below,the Office of State Procurement confirms it approves of this Agreement as required by RCW 39.34.050 and It Is authorized to enter into this Agreement pursuant to RCW 39.34.030 and RCW 39.34.080. Similarly,by its signature below,the Cooperative Member confirms it is authorized to enter Into this Agreement pursuant to RCW 39.34.030 and RCW 39.34.080. 17) PAYMENT and NOTICES:Payment shall be made to OSP at the address provided below. Further,any notice,demand or other communication required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be made to the parties at the addresses provided below. The Cooperative Member agrees to pay the membership fee as a part of this Agreement. Late payments may be subject to statutory interest and collection related costs. First time Cooperative Members joining after June 30th may have their fee prorated, if the member has not previously accessed state contracts. Pro-rated fees will be based on 6-month intervals,January—June,June—December. 3 of 1 1 s ti Mall the signed Agreement and payment to: State of Washington,OSP PAF-Non/Prof Fund:422 04 20 000214, Room 303 General Administration Bldg., P,O,Box 41008,Olympia,WA 08504-1008 Cooperative Member contact Information; Contact Person to whom contract documents and related communications are to be mailed or faxed. Cooperative Member Agency Name: ai. 0C &ntr,P _ 1es� Agency Federal TIN#: -1t- iCil(-111b Contact Name: 1';1eis,s ,n. ,, Address: 111 ri C. Svrae A : R\le, %til\e, .V„ City,St.Zip . A.V..).. . U,XN, ' a.c it, Phone Number: LSCAY1Z0-SC8+4 Fax Number: I SCA)G% -tYLA[4 Email Address: m :.�: 16 _, Secondary Contact: Name:. Kew `EhgmpsOr-, Email: k mrprrr;c�spdew►c9a.1\t,d•or3 Two-Year Membership Fee Schedule Note: Total expenditures listed below are minus of debt service and Inter-fund transfers Annual Annual Two-Year Verified expenditures expenditures of Membership Fee Level of more than less than Fee $0.00 $3,000,000 $400 $3,000,001 $7,600,000 - $1,000 $7,500,001 $30,000,000 $2,000 $30,000,001 $68,000,000 "$4,000 X $68,000,001 $80,000,000 $6,000 $90,000,001 ' $150,000,000 $8,000 $150,000,001 and over $10,000 According to the most recent authoritative Information;City of Spokane Valley,your annual operating expenditures were$81,236,531.00 making your two-year fee$4,000.00. The undersigned has read, understands and agrees to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, certifies that he/she is the Authorized Signatory for the Cooperative Member,and certifies under penalty of perjury under the laws of Washington State that the verified expenditure in the Membership Fee Schedule above Is true and correct. Cooperative Memb r uth d Signature: Signature: ,/ Date Signed: /-24- l l Print Name: V'),, "C xrvpsc n Title: .rins.%tr 'trer-Nrw- Address(if nol the same as above): Phone Number(s): 50a r v FOR OSP = ONLY(Completed by OSP,this page will be returned to you In executed copy) Approved a I.form: AAG Date: 10/1 612 s atuls bte) f 'o r as-ig Co-op member number i0' b'd R has: provide this number to vendors when ordering f', . � \ras Ii : lading � th OSP.. it ip1 iC t1RE !� V`� ,I I OP Verification Used l��q � r 1 .-te _ x .171 4of4 • ASSIGNMENT OF INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT Amendment Number 1 • to • State of Washington Department of General Administration Intergovernmental Agreement Number 2011-WPC-070 for Office of State Procurement State Purchasing Cooperative This Amendment Number 1 to Department of General Administration Intergovernmental Agreement Number 2011-WPC-070 is made and entered by and between the State of Washington Department of General Administration,hereinafter referred to as GA ,and City of S 'oCane Valley hereinafter referred to as "COOPERATIVE MEMBER". The purpose of this Amendment is i&farmally assign the • - - - Intergovernmental: greennent made on January.21,2011•between:.aA aridTCOOPERATWE MEMBER, to the Washington State Department of Enterprise Services. • . ' WHEREAS,the Washington State Legislature.passed Engrossed Substitute-Senate Bill 5931 (ESSB 5931) consolidating all or portions of the Washington State Department of Inforination Services,Department of Personnel,State Printer, General Administration and the Office of Financial Management(Agencies); WHEREAS,the authority and funding for those Agencies has been withdrawn effective October 1,2011; WHEREAS,the Washington State Legislature has created under ESSB 5931•which includes delegation of contracting authority,the Department of Enterprise Services hereinafter referred to DES; • WHEREAS,the authority and funding for the continuation of Intergovernmental Agreement Number 2011- WPC-070 has been transferred to the DES; WHEREAS, the DES finds that it is in the best interest of the State of Washington to continue to conduct business with Cooperative Member under the terms and conditions of this Intergovernmental Agreement 2011-WPC-070. Now therefore,DES and COOPERATIVE MEMBER agree that 1. Effective October 1,20l lthe Intergovernmental Agreement 2011-WPC-070 is hereby assigned in all respects to DES. 2. By signing this Amendment,COOPERATIVE MEMBER hereby consents to this assignment. As assigned,said Agreement hereby amended so that wherever the name GA is used it shall mean DES. 3. Any and all payments made by COOPERATIVE MEMBER to GA shall be deemed to have been made to DES and shall discharge COOPERATIVE MEMBER from any further liability with regard to said payment. Further, the Intergovernmental Agreement is hereby modified: 3) Term of this Agreement and Cooperative membership is extended one(1)year through December 31,2012. Either party may terminate this Agreement upon thirty (30)days written notification to the other party. However, if the Cooperative Member has used state contracts during the current membership period,the Cooperative Member remains liable to pay any • • ASSIGNMENT OF INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT Amendment Number 2 to State of Washington Department of Enterprise Services Intergovernmental Agreement Number 2011-WPC-070 for Master Contracts, Consulting and Oversight State Purchasing Cooperative This Amendment Number 2 to Department of Enterprise Services Intergovernmental Agreement Number 2011-WPC-070 is made and entered by and between the State of Washington.Department of Enterprise Services, hereinafter referred to as "DES", and City of Spokane Valley, hereinafter referred to as "COOPERATIVE MEMBER". The purpose of this Amendment is to extend the Intergovernmental Agreement between DES and COOPERATIVE MEMBER. The Intergovernmental Agreement is hereby modified: 3) Term of this Agreement and Cooperative membership is extended six (6) months through June 30,2013. • • 17)PAYMENT and NOTICES: COOPERATIVE MEMBER six month fee is $1,000.00. ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT SHALL REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have read this Amendment Number 2 to Intergovernmental Agreement 2011-WPC-070 in its entirety, agree to it and hereby assert that they have the authority • to bind their respective parties to it. Approved Approved Department of Enterprise Services City of Spokane Valley SIGNATURE SIGNATURE • Chris Cantrell PRINT OR TYPE NAME DATE PRINT OR TYPE NAME DATE Coop Program Coordinator TITLE TITLE • Page 1 of 2011-WPC-070 Contact Information We consider regular contact with you to be very important, especially in this time of change. In order to keep you up to date with the latest changes we need to verify that your contact information. Below is the contact information we have on file for your organization. Please indicate any changes that need to be made to this information in the spaces provided at the bottom of the page. Organization Name: City of Spokane Valley Contact Name: Melissa Holien Mailing Address: 11707 E Sprague Ave Ste 106,,, .r.,,. Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Contact Phone Number: 509-720-5044 Please indicate changes below • Organization Name: Contact Name: ; r1 C-T,b \r■ Mailing Address: City/State/Zip: Contact Phone Number: Contact E-mail: • • Please return with your signed amendment to DES, Attn: Coop Program, PO Box 41017, Olympia, WA 98504-1017. if you have any questions, please contact us at coop @des.wa.goy or 360-407-9396. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Administrative report— process for declaring an emergency GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 38.52; RCW 35A.33 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: Staff wanted to provide the Council with some training on emergency declarations in a non-emergency setting. This will provide an opportunity for the Council to learn this process so it will better understand when such declarations may be issued, and to walk through the process. What is an emergency?A disaster or emergency is defined in RCW 38.52 as being "an event or set of circumstances which: (i) Demands immediate action to preserve public health, protect life, protect public property, or to provide relief to any stricken community overtaken by such occurrences, or (ii) reaches such a dimension or degree of destructiveness as to warrant the governor declaring a state of emergency pursuant to RCW 43.06.010." The City has declared an emergency two times, both in 2008. The conditions giving rise to those declarations involved the Valley View fire in July and extreme snow conditions in December. Who declares an emergency? The City Manager is the person authorized by law in our form of government to formally proclaim an emergency when there is insufficient time to convene the City Council for consideration of a resolution declaring the emergency. The City Manager or City Council would make this determination following consultation with appropriate emergency personnel such as the Fire Chief from District 8 or Spokane Valley Fire, the Police Chief, the Spokane County Sheriff, or the Department of Emergency Management for Spokane County. If the City Manager proclaims the emergency, staff would present a resolution declaring an emergency for Council consideration at a specially called meeting, or at the next regularly scheduled meeting. If the emergency affects territory in another jurisdiction, such as unincorporated Spokane County, Liberty Lake, Millwood, or Spokane, the other jurisdiction(s) would consider whether conditions warranted a similar declaration, and act accordingly. Similarly, if the emergency conditions affect a wide area, the Board of County Commissioners may declare an emergency for the entire County. If the emergency is regional, or conditions are severe, the Governor may declare an emergency for the broader area. Emergency response plan. State law also requires each jurisdiction to establish an emergency management program, and to adopt an emergency management plan. Alternatively, jurisdictions are authorized to join together to form a program and adopt a multi-jurisdictional emergency response plan. This is the approach the cities in Spokane County have taken, including Spokane Valley. The regional cities and towns are members of the Interlocal Agreement for Emergency Management, which was last updated in mid-2012. The emergency response plan would provide the framework for dealing with a regional emergency. What are consequences of declaring emergency? First, pursuant to RCW 38.52.070(2), the bidding laws are suspended for those tasks "necessary to combat such disaster, protecting the health and safety of persons and property, and providing emergency assistance to the victims of such disaster." This is critical so that the City can go about the business of providing for its citizens in a time of need without having to go through the time-consuming requirements of public bidding and purchasing. If the bidding requirements were waived in this fashion, the City Council would be required to make written findings of the existence of the emergency on the record no later than two weeks after the emergency. This would occur when a resolution declaring the emergency is presented for Council consideration generally at the next regularly scheduled meeting, as discussed above. The second consequence of declaring an emergency is that it sends a strong message to the citizens that conditions exist which present a serious risk of harm or injury, and the expectation is that people, so warned, will be able to better take care of themselves. Third, the declaration may impose limitations on what people are able to do as a result of specific conditions, such as entering the river due to extreme high water. Lastly, a disaster declaration may qualify a jurisdiction for state or federal disaster relief funds, depending on the extent of the conditions and the impact on people and/or property. Such a request would highly likely be by the regional Department of Emergency Management or by the Governor. The actual process of declaring an emergency by City staff. Generally speaking, when conditions exist which warrant consideration of declaring an emergency, various City staff will be extremely busy and may not have the time or ability to type up an Emergency Proclamation for the City Manager to sign. For that reason, we have put together a notebook that contains all of the necessary forms with which to declare an emergency on very short notice, including in electronic form on a USB thumb drive for use remotely if necessary in the event City Hall is not accessible or operational. These forms are fill-in-the-blank, so can be done very quickly. These would then be sent to the regional Department of Emergency Management. Copies and notice would also be sent to the major media entities in the region, and posted on the City's website in an effort to get broad dissemination. Applicable Revised Code of Washington (RCW) provisions relating to emergency response, as well as all relevant contact information for regional and state emergency response providers, are also contained in the notebook. The Mayor, City Manager, City Attorney, Police Chief, and Public Information Officer have copies of the notebook. At some point, the conditions causing the emergency pass and staff would present a resolution to the Council declaring the emergency to be over. Staff will briefly walk through a fictitious emergency situation so the Council can see how the process is intended to work. OPTIONS: NA RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: NA BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: NA STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney ATTACHMENTS: 1) Emergency Proclamation by City Manager 2) Resolution Emergency Declaration by City Council 1 DISCUSSION ON DECLARING AN EMERGENCY Presented by the Office of the City Attorney Disasters can take various forms - Past disasters in our area : Flooding from rising water in the Spokane River Past disasters The Valley View fire Past disasters Heavy winter weather Past disasters in Ice storms Past disasters Volcanic activity Statutory authority The authority for cities under state law for declaring a disaster, and the consequences for doing so, are found in RCW 35A.33 and RCW 38.52. What is a " disaster"? "an event or set of circumstances which: Demands immediate action to preserve public health, protect life, protect public property, or to provide relief to any stricken community overtaken by such occurrences; or Reaches such a dimension or degree of destructiveness as to warrant the governor declaring a state of emergency pursuant to RCW 43.06.010". Localized emergency The City and its staff primarily respond to smaller, localized emergencies. Over the past ten years, the City has declared an emergency two times, both in 2008. the Valley View fire in July the big snow in December Consequences of disaster declaration The primary benefits for a jurisdiction in declaring a disaster are as follows: The jurisdiction can enter into contracts directly related to responding to the emergency without following bidding laws, although a proper accounting must be performed later. In short, take care of your citizens and do the paperwork when you can reasonably do so. If the disaster is significant enough, it may qualify the City to receive state or federal disaster assistance. Certain activity can be limited, such as entering river, or implement a burn ban, if unsafe. It alerts the citizenry of the condition for their safety. Regional or statewide disaster The Board of County Commissioners or the Governor has authority to declare that emergency conditions exist over a broader area affecting multiple jurisdictions. An example is when former Gov. Gregoire declared on October 7, 2012 that all outside burning was banned due to extremely dry conditions, which created a significant risk of wildfire. In such a case, our City would not have to independently declare the emergency, although it may. Sometimes, the City may declare an emergency, which then becomes larger, and then the County or Governor may declare the larger emergency. 12 Interlocal Agreement for Emergency Management — Regional disasters ❑ The City is a member of the regional Interlocal Agreement for Emergency Management. o Recently updated in summer 2012. o Responsibility to draft/maintain a response plan. ci Small staff dedicated to emergency response. Director is County Sheriff, Deputy Director is Tom Mattern. Mobilize on an as-needed basis utilizing assets from various partner members. 13 How would a disaster declaration occur in the Cit for a significant snow event? ow In Scenario — Snowing for six straight days, average 8 inches per day. City has contract for snow plowing with ABC contractor; City contracts with four additional contractors to provide plowing service with road graders in the event of heavy or sustained snow. 1-1 Amount of snow exceeds capacity of contractors to handle on third day, Friday morning. o People are unable to get out of neighborhoods. The City needs additional graders under contract immediately. 14 Process for declaring emergency ❑ Public Works would identify potential contractors. ❑ City Manager would access the Emergency Proclamation by either using the electronic form or the paper copy. City would not use bidding process, and would instead execute contracts with what would likely be four or five additional contractors. This is allowed even if there is no money currently budgeted. ❑ The necessary work would get done with as little delay as possible. -1 At the next Council meeting, staff would present a resolution to Council declaring the emergency, and ratifying the actions by staff in bypassing the bidding laws. When the emergency is over Once the conditions giving rise to the emergency have passed, staff would present a resolution to the Council declaring that the emergency was over. In the event it was part of a wider emergency, staff may apply for reimbursement from the state or federal government, which is coordinated through the Spokane Department of Emergency Management. Updated 1-7-13 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON,RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON,PROCLAIMING AN EMERGENCY OR DISASTER IN THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WASHINGTON,AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley staff and/or the Greater Spokane Department of Emergency Management has reported to the Spokane Valley City Council THAT on (date) , at (time) , a (DESCRIPTION OF INCIDENT) severely disrupted or is disrupting the health, safety and welfare within the City of Spokane Valley and caused or is causing extensive damage in parts of the City of Spokane Valley; and WHEREAS, an emergency or disaster exists that necessitates utilization of the emergency powers granted pursuant to RCW 38.52 and/or 35A.33; and WHEREAS, the emergency conditions warrant the calling of an emergency meeting of the City Council without prior notice pursuant to RCW 42.30.070; and WHEREAS, significant economic loss has occurred or is occurring as a result of shutdowns necessary to conduct structural assessments of facilities; and WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley is responsible for maintaining the health, safety, and welfare of its citizens; and WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley has authority, pursuant to RCW 38.52.070(2), "to enter into contracts and incur obligations necessary to combat such disaster, protecting the health and safety of persons and property, and providing emergency assistance to the victims of such disaster. Each political subdivision is authorized to exercise the powers vested under this section in the light of the exigencies of an extreme emergency situation without regard to time-consuming procedures and formalities prescribed by law (excepting mandatory constitutional requirements), including, but not limited to, budget law limitations, requirements of competitive bidding and publication of notices, provisions pertaining to the performance of public work, entering into contracts, the incurring of obligations, the employment of temporary workers,the rental of equipment, the purchase of supplies and materials, the levying of taxes, and the appropriation and expenditures of public funds..."; and WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley is a party to the regional Interlocal Agreement for Emergency Management Services. That interlocal agreement was established pursuant to RCW 39.34 and RCW 38.52.070 to facilitate cooperation between the City of Spokane Valley and the other local governments that are parties to the agreement in the event of an emergency; and WHEREAS, state and federal resources are supplemental to local jurisdiction efforts; and WHEREAS, City Manager Mike Jackson proclaimed that emergency conditions exist at p.m. on ,201*; and WHEREAS, a local "Proclamation of Emergency" is a preliminary step to requesting a "Proclamation of Emergency"from the Governor and requesting state and federal assistance, Page 1 of 2 Updated 1-7-13 NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1—Purpose and intent. As a result of the aforementioned conditions,it is the purpose and intent of this Resolution to formally proclaim the existence of an emergency or disaster in the City of Spokane Valley due to (explanation) SECTION 2—Definitions. "Emergency or disaster" as used in all sections of this Resolution except RCW 38.52.430 shall mean an event or set of circumstances which: (i) Demands immediate action to preserve public health, protect life, protect public property, or to provide relief to any stricken community overtaken by such occurrences, or (ii) reaches such a dimension or degree of destructiveness as to warrant the governor declaring a state of emergency pursuant to RCW 43.06.010. SECTION 3—Emergency Proclamation. A. The action by City Manager Mike Jackson in proclaiming an emergency at a.m./p.m. on (date) is ratified by the City Council. B. It is hereby declared that there has been an emergency since (date) and continues to be an emergency or disaster as a result of the aforementioned conditions in the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington; therefore, designated departments are authorized to enter into contracts and incur obligations necessary to combat such emergency to protect the health, safety and welfare of persons and property, and provide emergency assistance to the victims of such disaster pursuant to RCW 38.52 and/or 35A.33. C. Each designated department is authorized to exercise the powers enumerated in this Resolution in light of the demands of an extreme emergency situation without regard to time consuming procedures and formalities prescribed by law(except mandatory constitutional requirements). SECTION 4 Effective Date. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect upon adoption, and shall remain in effect until subsequent action by the City Council stating the conditions giving rise to this Emergency Proclamation have subsided. DATED this day of ,20**. *,Mayor ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Page 2 of 2 Updated 1-7-13 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON PROCLAMATION OF EMERGENCY OR DISASTER IN THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WASHINGTON,BY THE CITY MANAGER,AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley staff and/or the Spokane City/County Department of Emergency Management has reported to the Spokane Valley City Council THAT on (date) , at (time) , a (DESCRIPTION OF INCIDENT) severely disrupted or is disrupting the health, safety and welfare within the City of Spokane Valley and caused or is causing extensive damage in parts of the City of Spokane Valley; and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 38.52.010, an "emergency or disaster" shall mean"an event or set of circumstances which: (i) Demands immediate action to preserve public health, protect life, protect public property, or to provide relief to any stricken community overtaken by such occurrences, or (ii) reaches such a dimension or degree of destructiveness as to warrant the governor declaring a state of emergency pursuant to RCW 43.06.010." WHEREAS, an emergency or disaster exists that necessitates utilization of the emergency powers granted pursuant to RCW 38.52 and/or 35A.33; and WHEREAS, significant economic loss has occurred or is occurring as a result of shutdowns necessary to conduct structural assessments of facilities; and WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley is responsible for maintaining the health, safety, and welfare of its citizens; and WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley has authority, pursuant to RCW 38.52.070(2), "to enter into contracts and incur obligations necessary to combat such disaster, protecting the health and safety of persons and property, and providing emergency assistance to the victims of such disaster. Each political subdivision is authorized to exercise the powers vested under this section in the light of the exigencies of an extreme emergency situation without regard to time-consuming procedures and formalities prescribed by law (excepting mandatory constitutional requirements), including, but not limited to, budget law limitations, requirements of competitive bidding and publication of notices, provisions pertaining to the performance of public work, entering into contracts, the incurring of obligations, the employment of temporary workers, the rental of equipment, the purchase of supplies and materials, the levying of taxes, and the appropriation and expenditures of public funds...";and WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley is a party to the regional Interlocal Agreement for Emergency Management Services. That interlocal agreement was established pursuant to RCW 39.34 and RCW 38.52.070 to facilitate cooperation between the City of Spokane Valley and the other local governments that are parties to the agreement in the event of an emergency; and WHEREAS, state and federal resources are supplemental to local jurisdiction efforts; and WHEREAS, a local "Proclamation of Emergency" is a preliminary step to requesting a "Proclamation of Emergency"from the Governor and requesting state and federal assistance, Page 1 of 2 Updated 1-7-13 NOW THEREFORE, I Mike Jackson, City Manager of the City of Spokane Valley, as a result of the aforementioned situation and pursuant to RCW 35A.13.080 and RCW 38.52.070: DO HEREBY PROCLAIM that a State of Emergency exists in the City of Spokane Valley and direct that the plans and procedures of the currently adopted Interlocal Agreement for Emergency Management Services be implemented. Designated departments are authorized to enter into contracts and incur obligations necessary to combat such emergency to protect the health, safety and welfare of person and property, and provide emergency assistance to the victims of such disaster. Each designated department is authorized to exercise the powers vested in this proclamation in light of the demands of an extreme emergency situation without regard to time consuming procedures and formalities prescribed by law(except mandatory constitutional requirements). DATED this day of ,201*. Mike Jackson, City Manager Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: February 19, 2013 Department Director Approval: ❑ Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Small Works Projects Bids GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 90.48, Chapter 173-200 WAC, Title 33 U.S.C. 1251-1376; Storm and Surface Water Utility: SVMC 3.80. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Project is included with adopted 2013 budget. BACKGROUND: In September 2012, Stormwater Utility staff prepared plans and specifications for two small projects for the repair of flooding arterials (caused by failing drywells) on Pines Road (just south of Broadway Ave.) and Dishman Mica Road (just south of Appleway Blvd.). The two projects were combined and put out to bid through the City's Small Works Roster process. This advertisement for bids received no responses. The bid package was immediately advertised again and one bid was received in the amount of $249,975 which was substantially higher than the engineer's estimate. The singular bid was rejected, with the thought that more favorable bids and more participation would be received in early 2013. Staff advertised the Projects for bid again in January through the Small Works Roster process, and again received only one bid for $216,208.02. However, this bid is approximately $34,000 less than the bid received in 2012. Although this bid is higher than our estimate it is still well within the budget of $290,000. Additionally, the flooding project for Pines Road is time sensitive, because WSDOT is planning an asphalt overlay of Pines Road from Trent Avenue to 32nd Avenue with anticipated construction in late summer of 2013. The Pines Road drainage issue needs to be repaired prior to WSDOT paving the roadway. Generally, these small stormwater projects are approved by the City Manager, who has up to $200,000 in contract authority. But because this bid exceeds that approval threshold, staff is requesting Council approval for this award. OPTIONS: Discussion item RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion and concurrence to bring this item back at the next regular meeting for motion consideration. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The 2013 Stormwater Utility budget includes $290,000 for Stormwater Utility small works maintenance projects. Remaining funds not used for this contract will be used for other smaller-scale projects, to be bid later in 2013. STAFF CONTACT: Eric Guth, Public Works Director Ryan Brodwater, Assistant Stormwater Engineer ATTACHMENTS: Bid Tabulation, Stormwater Utility 2013 Small Works Projects, Phase 1 Cat's Eye Excavating QU°ANmY _ Total Cost Total'C � �-?�,... ._Y .YA= feY �ii':' ryi $'%"'�"y"� :'r T.y,. Y�Mfr•s' "' .: -i e 1> is :+:�i:4' t 4,'I M (.3rr"k"�"�X' .,, i' ",'„Ii ..• il,..._.. .,f,,,:N 44e14;011644,' iiI :i x's }.;��; . �II7,,16* .t i . - s:; �''fi�.�. �' :. �t.x-n'r?;.�..,.:a�t_�G � '��' � ? �. ir;t" i� ? `�'�_�:: �", z>c,yr.a 3k 1�.- ,,�uri�-r Ma � , �,�.�,a,AS€�{'sAr�.3r.��,��z MOBILIZA TION,SCHEDULE•A 1 $ 9,026.60 •$ 9,026.60 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,C .CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING . ®MEM $ 50040. ;$ 500.00 $ 3,349;50 $ 3,: PORTABLE CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN DAY 2 $ 200.00 $ 400.00 .$ 1,000:00 .$ 2,C SEQUENTIAL ARROW SIGNS DAY 10 $ 200.00 .$ 2.000.00 :$ 200.00 $ 2,C SPCC PLAN. MEM 1 $ 200.00.. $ 200.00 $ 4,0.00. $ 4,C SAWCUT ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT 111111M11 760 $ 1.00 $ 760.00 .$ 0.45 '$ , REMOVE PCC.CURB AND GUTTER ® 3Q $ 3.00 $ 90:00 $ 12.28. $ REMOVE PCC SIDEWALK/DRI DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA For Planning Discussion Purposes Only as of February 13,2013; 10:15 a.m. Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative To: Council & Staff From: City Clerk, by direction of City Manager Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings SPECIAL MEETING Feb 26,2013 Winter Workshop 8:30a.m.-5:00p.m. [due Tues,Feb 19] Council Chambers (Note:no evening Council meeting) Tentative Topics: Ten-Year Anniversary Work Plan 2013 City Hall Manufactured Homes Zoning Business Route Signage Council Goals Solid Waste Legislative Agenda City Funding Opportunities: Outside Agency;Lodging Tax Council Meeting Processes Misc. Items:Appleway Beautification;Review of 2012 budget Thurs,February,28,2013(10 a.m. —9 p.m.)—City Hall at the Mall,Food Court March 5,2013,Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Feb 25] ACTION ITEMS: 1.Motion Consideration: Small Works Projects Bids —Eric Guth (10 minutes) NON-ACTION ITEMS: 2. Public Access Plan Review(Shoreline Master Program)—Lori Barlow,Tadas Kisielius (30 minutes) 3. CMAQ/TA Grant Projects—Steve Worley (15 minutes) 4. Sign Code Discussion—John Hohman (30 minutes) 5. CTA 01-13,Proposed Amendment to 19.120,Townhouses in Neighborhood Commercial—Scott Kuhta(20 min) 6. Sprague On-Street Parking Discussion—Eric Guth (15 minutes) 7.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 125 minutes] Wed,March 6,2013-Mayor Towey's State of the City Address (special meeting) 12:00— 1:00 p.m. 2nd Floor Community Room, Spokane Valley Mall, 14700 E Indiana Avenue AND 6:00 p.m.—7:00 p.m., CenterPlace Auditorium, March 12,2013,Formal Meetin2 Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon March 4] 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Draft Amended 2013 TIP—Steve Worley (10 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3. Proposed Resolution 13-001: Acceptance of SMP Public Access Plan—Lori Barlow (10 minutes) 4.Motion Consideration: CMAQ/TA Grant Projects—Steve Worley (10 minutes) 5.Mayoral Appointments: Committee Appointments for Councilmember Higgins—Mayor Towey(10 min) 6.Mayoral Appointments: Appointment of Planning Commissioner—Mayor Towey (10 minutes) 7.Admin Report: Update on Initiative 502 (cannabis)—Erik Lamb (15 minutes) 8.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Towey (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 75 minutes] Sat,March 16,2013,10 a.m. to 4 p.m.—Spokane Valley 10'h Anniversary/Birthday Celebration March 19,2013, Study Session Meetin2 Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,March 11] 1.Advance Agenda Draft Advance Agenda 2/14/2013 1:23:14 PM Page 1 of 2 March 26,2013,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,March 18] 1.March Community Recognition,Presentation of Key and Certificate—Mayor Towey (5 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3. Proposed Ordinance 1st reading, 19.120,Townhouses in Neighborhood Commercial—Scott Kuhta(20 min) 4.Motion Consideration: Amended 2013 TIP—Steve Worley (15 minutes) 5. Information Only: Dept Reports; Planning Commission Minutes [*estimated meeting: 45 minutes] April 2,2013, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon,March 25] 1.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) April 9,2013,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,April 1] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Proposed Ordinance 2nd reading, 19.120,Townhouses in Neighborhood Commercial—Scott Kuhta(20 min) April 16,2013, Study Session Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,April 8] 1.Advance Agenda April 23,2013,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,April 15] 1.April Community Recognition,Presentation of Key and Certificate—Mayor Towey (5 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Towey (5 minutes) 4. Information Only: Dept Reports;Planning Commission Minutes April 30,2013, Study Session Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,April 22] 1.Advance Agenda May 7,2013, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,April 29] 1.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: ADA Transition Plan Solid Waste Analysis Appleway Landscape Improvements Speed Limits(overall system) Arts Council Spokane Valley Day at the Fair(Sept 10,2013) Bidding Contracts(SVMC 3.—bidding exceptions) SRTC Interlocal (amended) Budget,2013 amendment Stormwater Capital Projects Budget workshop for 2014(early June?) Regional Transportation Issues CDBG(spring 2013) TIP(June,for six yr 2014-2019) Coal Train EIS Crime Reporting *time for public or Council comments not included Future Acquisition Areas Gateway,Regional MOU Governance Manual Interlocal Agreement,Purchasing PEG Funds(Education) Public Safety Contract,Proposed Amendment Revenue Policy, Cost Recovery Draft Advance Agenda 2/14/2013 1:23:14 PM Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: Februarys 19, 2013 Department Director Approval: El Check all that apply: LI consent ❑ cold business 0 new business [] public hearing 1 information ❑ admin, report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2013 SRTC CMAQ/TA Calls for Projects GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adopted the 2013-2018 Six Year TIP on June 26, 2012 BACKGROUND: The Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) is scheduled to issue a 2013 CaII for Projects on March 1g1, 2013 for the allocation of federal transportation funding for both the Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality (CMAQ) and Transportation Alternatives (TA) programs for the years 2013-2016. This call for projects is the result of Congress' passage of a new federal transportation bill called Moving Ahead for Progress rn the 21' Century (MAP-21), Approximately $20 million in CMAQ funding and $2.3 million in TA funding will be available for the Spokane region for the next four years, Pre-applications for the CMAQ program are due Monday April 1st, 2013_ A short-list of approved MAO projects will be selected. Final project applications for both the CMAQ and TA programs will be due Tuesday, April 301h, 2013. Copies of the draft application forms are included for additional information, A summary of each program is shown below. CMAQ Summary % Approx. Funds Available 45% $9 Million Traffic Improvements Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), Intersection or corridor improvements (turn lanes, signal coordination, Traffic Management Center) - - - - -_ — Travel Demand Management 40% $8 Million Commute Trip Reduction, Bike & Pedestrian, Transit, carpacllvanpooI programs, travell demand management programs PM10 16% $3 Million Paving gravel roads, street sweepers, Diesel Engine retrofits or fleet upades Total $20.0 Million Key CMAQ Scoring Criteria: • Air Quality Benefit(60 pts)=What is the projected benefit? Cost-benefit ratio? • Economic Vitality (10 pts)-Improves access to key destinations or major transportation routes andlor hubs. Population density. • Cooperation & Leadership (15 pts)- Is project consistent with regional and local planning documents?Agency coordination and cooperation? Public involvement? • Stewardship (15 pts) -Minimizes impacts to environment, ability to advance, previous funding? Does it serve low income andfor minority populations? TA Summary % Approx. Funds Available 100% $2.3 Million Eligible Project Activities: • Bicycle & Pedestrian Facilities • Vegetation management practices in ROW • Historic Preservation • Preservation of abandoned RR corridors for bike/pedestrian projects Key TA Scoring Criteria: • Economic Vitality (15 pts)- Improves access to pedestrian generators, commercial centers, city/regional centers, transit access. Consistent with adopted local economic developmentirevitalization plan • Cooperation & Leadership(1 0 pts) - Is project consistent with regional and local planning documents? • Stewardship (10 pts)- Minimizes impacts to environment, ability to advance, previous funding? • Quality of Life (10 pts) - Does it include elements that contribute to quality place making?, Does it support health promoting transportation options? • Choice and Mobility (30 pts) -Add or improve pedestrian facilities?, Add or improve bicycle facilities?, Improve Transit Access?, Expand modes of transportation?, Does it serve low income and/or minority populations? • Safety (20 pts) -Does it address known accidents arrdfor safety hazards? • Matching &Community Support (5 pts)- Matching funds committed above required minimum?, Demonstrated community support? Staff has been evaluating the proposed CMAQ and TA grant criteria to identify potential city projects to review with council. Information staff uses to develop this draft list of projects includes: • The 2013-2018 Six Year TIP • ITS Plan • Bike and Pedestrian Plan Possible CMAQ Projects: 1, Appleway Trail, (University to Evergreen) 2, Appleway Trail, (Evergreen to Corbin) 3. Park Rd Sidewalk (20O-ft south of Sinta to Indiana) 4, Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Project 5. Pave Gravel Roads Possible TA Projects: 1. Park Rd Sidewalk (200-ft south of Sint° to Indiana) 2. Bowdish Rd. Sidewalk Phase 1 (8th to 12th) 3, Bowdish Rd. Sidewalk Phase 2 (12'1' to 16th) 4. Sullivan Rd. Sidewalk (4th to 16 h) The CMAQ/TA Call for Projects will also be the first appplicaticn cycle that SRTC will require the completion of the new Safe and Complete Streets [Checklist form to be completed with each project application. The checklist was developed last year by SRTC as a threshold requirement for future projects to ensure that a 'holistic' approach to street and non-vehicle projects is considered during project development A copy of the Safe and Complete Streets Checklist has also been attached for your information. OPTIONS: Information only. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Information only. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Project costs are currently being developed in more detail for each project. The city's match on federally funded projects is typically 13.5% of the total project cost. The match for pedestrian projects is 20%. An initial review of the projected REET funds through 2016 appears to indicate sufficient funds to provide the city's match for the recommended projects. STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Worley, PE —Senior Capital Projects Engineer Inga Note, P.E. — Senior Traffic Engineer ATTACHMENTS: Draft CMAQ Applications Form; Draft TA Application Form; Safe and Complete Streets Checklist APPENDIX C.SAFE AND COMPLETE STREETS POLICY& CHECKLIST POLICY FOR SAFE ANO COMPLETE STREETS Approved by the SRTC Board on September 13, 2012 Purpose This Safe and Complete Streets Policy is written to incorporate the needs of all users into the design and construction of roadway projects funded through the Spokane Regional Transportation Council. Users include, but are not limited to, people of all ages and abilities who are motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists,transit and school bus riders, motorcyclists, freight providers, emergency responders and adjacent land users, This policy applies to projects funded through SRTC and new projects requested to be included in the TIP. The Safe and Complete Streets concept is an initiative to design and build roads that adequately accommodate all users of the transportation system. This concept anticipates that appropriate features be included so that alL modes of transportation can function safely and independently} in current and future conditions. A Safe and Complete Streets Policy can be adapted to fit local community needs and used to direct future regional transportation planning. Such a pelicy should incorporate cnmmunity values and qualities including environment, aesthetics, historic and natural resources as well as safety and mobility.This approach demands careful multi- moda1 evaluation for all transportation projects, This policy will act as a stand-alone policy until incorporated into the 2013 Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Goals 1. To ensure that the regional decision-making process routinely considers the safety and convenience of all transportation users during planning and programming; 2. To maximize mobility and access to opportunities for all area residents; 3. To recognize the need for flexible Safe and Complete Street solutions to fit within the context(s) of communities in our diverse rural, suburban and urban region, 4. To create a carnprehensive, integrated and connected transportation system that supports transportation choices and strengthens access to and use of transit; 5. To create attractive places that can make businesses more accessible and appealing and increase retail sales and commercial activity; 6, To encourage healthy, active living through walking, biking and transit use while reducing transportation system demand, mobile source emissions and vehicle miles travelled. Policy Statement SRTC encourages project sponsors to achieve a safe, balanced, affordable, multi-modal and equitable transportation system by implementing Safe and Complete Streets with context- sensitive solutions within our diverse urban, suburban and rural communities. Each project will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. SRTC encourages local jurisdictions to adopt and implement Safe and Complete Streets policies. Applicability The SRTC Safe and Complete Streets Policy shall apply to the following: Call for Protects Any roadway construction or reconstruction projects that will use federal funding through an SRTC Call for Projects including planning, design, right-of-way acquisition, construction or construction engineering. Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Any programming activities conducted by SRTC for projects seeking inclusion in the Transportation Improvement Program after the adoption of the Safe and Complete Streets Policy. Process When SRTC issues a Call for Projects for roadway projects or a project with any funding source is to be programmed in the Transportation Improvement Program, the project sponsors will be required to complete the SRTC Safe and Complete Streets Checklist (see Attachment 1) to document how the needs of users were considered in the process of planning and/or designing the project for which the funds are requested. For projects that do not accommodate all users, project sponsors must document why the project is being proposed as designed. The answers to the checklist will determine if a project is exempt from this Safe and Complete Street Policy or regarded to be in compliance with this Policy and therefore be approved. If a project is neither approved nor exempt with this policy, the project will be determined incomplete or denied. If certain information required in the checklist is not known at the time of the project submittal, the project sponsor shall provide general detail on the required submittal information, but shall state, "Specific information has not yet been determined." If the project is programmed into the TIP, the project sponsor shall update SRTC as part of its regular reporting and participate in the checklist process once the necessary information is available.All TIP projects will be required at some point to complete a Safe and Complete Streets Checklist and be either approved or exempted from the checklist process or risk being removed from the TIP. Project Review SRTC will review the project checklist prior to being submitted to the TIP or a Call for Project Process. Roadway projects listed in the TIP and Call for Projects shall dearly be labeled that they meet the Safe and Complete Streets policy, by being approved or exempted. Conversely, if the project does not meet the intent of this policy, the project checklist could be denied. The process is outlined below. Final appeal decisions will be made by the SRTC Board. SRTC Safe& Complete Streets Process - 1 Applies for Applies Ter Staff Review Chectutes Cheeidles (1 Week) €stmpttan Approval [ 1 I -- Request Request _ Dented Approved Opp°rtunity for Appeal Sponsor Sponsor Meddles or Modification Appeals Application (1 Week) 3 1 Appear Arpcxr Review 8.Resolution Denied Granted (t Week) SPCM5Or Modiries Opportunity for Modification Application (1 Week) Appeal Appal SRTC Board D cIsion pealed Granted '1 (1 Weekhe,er io eoudmerino 17 Required Step SRTC Goneple1es q{�y Process J l Optional Step Project Sponsor Reporting Once a project is programmed into the adopted TIP the project sponsor shall submit written status reports to SRTC committees pursuant to the biannual project tracking process. Project Description Changes The project sponsor shall report to SRTC immediately if a significant change to the roadway project is warranted, especially in the case of any change affecting the project's accommodations for one group of users. SRTC will review the requested change(s) to the project and determine if the change(s) affects the intent as detailed by the approved project descriptions. If a roadway project is determined to no longer meet the intent of this policy,the SRTC Policy Board shall consider removing the project from the TIP until such time that the project is brought into compliance with the Complete Streets Policy or is exempted. Evaluation To assist with evaluation of this policy, SRTC will use performance measures to help encourage meaningful progress in the region. Performance measures will include, but not be limited to, miles of sidewalk and bicycle network added to the regional transportation system. Implementation 1. Beginning with TIP and call for project applications submitted after adoption of this policy, project sponsors will adhere to this policy. 2. This policy will act as a stand-alone policy until it is incorporated into the 2013 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP). Attachment 1 SRTC Safe and Complete Streets Checklist PROJECT TITLE: JURISDICTION/AGENCY: PROJECT LOCATION; CONTACT NAME: CONTACT PHONE]1 1 C❑NrACT EMAIL° Recent federal, state, and regional policies call for routine consideration of all transportation users in the planning, design, and construction of all transportation projects, The SfTC Safe and Complete Streets Policy calls for the creation of this checklist, In accordance with the SWTC Safe and Complete Streets Policy, project sponsors applying for regional transportation funds and all projects that need to be included in the Transportation Improvement Program that entail construction or reconstruction must complete this checklist to document how the needs of all transportation users were considered In the process of planning and/or design of the project. For sponsors of projects that do not accommodate all transportation users,the project sponsors must document the reasons). Screening Criteria: Is this project located where pedestrian or bike traffic Is prohibited AND transit does not currently operate nor Is planned to operate in the next 15 ,years? NO If YES, the checklist is not required. tf NO, please complete the checklist. Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) projects are oliiy required to answer questions I.a and I.h. PROJECT DESCRIPTION.AND PURPOSE Project Description a. Please provide a protect description. Project Purpose b. Please describe the protect purpose. 11. EXISTING CONDITIONS Project Area a. What features for vehicles, transit operations,transit access, pedestrians and bicycles are included on the current facility and on facilities that it intersects or crosses? (Attach photo) b, If there are no existing transit access, pedestrian or bicycle facilities, hem far from the propcsed project are the closest parallel facilities? c, Please describe any particular transit access, pedestrian or bicycle uses or needs along the project corridor which you have observed cr about which you have been Informed? d What existing challenges could the proposed project address for transit operations and access, pedestrian and/or bicycle travel or safety in the vicinity of the project? e. Is transit operated or planned to operate In the project area? f. If yes,will the project accommodate access to transit for transit users? Demand - g. What trip generators iexisting and future) are in the vicinity of the proposed project that might attract transit customers,walkers,or bikers? Are these employees, students,visitors or others? Collisions - h, In the project design, have you considered collisions involving vehicles, pedestrians and bicyclists along the route of the facility? If so, what resources have you consulted? PLAIDS, POLICIES AND PROCESS Plans a. Do any adopted plans call for the development of transit access or service, pedestrian, or bicycle facilities on, crossing, or adjacent to the proposed facility/project? If yes, list the applicable plan(s)and section s). b. Is the proposed project consistent with these plans? Policies, Design Standards&Guideilr es c. Are there any local, statewide or federal policies that call for incorporating transit users, pedestrian and/or bicycle facilities into this project? If so what are they and have these policies been followed? d. Does the project meet street,vehicle,transit, pedestrian and/or bicycle facility applicable design standards or guidelines? if not, please explain why. e. If there have been any stakeholder or public meetings during which the proposed project has been discussed, what comments have been made regarding features for all modes of travel? 1V, THE PROJECT Project Scope a. What features, if any, are Included for traffic calming, place-making,transit operations, transit access, pedestrians and/or bicyclists in the proposed project design? (Attach design diagrams if available) Hindering Pedestrians or Bicyclists b. Will the proposed project remove an exist ng transit access, pedestrian, or bicycle facility, or block or hinder transit access,pedestrian movement or bike travel?If yes, please describe situation in detail, c. If the proposed project does not incorporate both pedestrian and bicycle facilities, or if the proposed project would hinder pedestrian or bike travel, list the reasons why the project is being proposed as designed. 1. Cost(1kehat would the cost of the transit access, pedestrian andforbike facilities add to the total project cost? Proportion of total project cost?) li. Right-of-way (is the right-of-way necessary to add facilities for ail modes of travel unavailable? Did an analysis lead to this conclusion?) 111. Other(Please explain.) Construction _ d. How will transit operations, access for transit, pedestrians and/or bicycles be maintained during project construction? - Ongoing Maintenance e. What agency will be responsible for ongoing maintenance of the facility and how will this be budgeted? 2014-2017 SRTC Transportation Alternatives (TA) Project Application s �„u �,y,rJmn�rrh�:a�P-truxir PROJECT TITLE: GENERAL:Pficiltai IWMM Ail ON Agency or Organization Phone Number Contact Person Email Address Project Location Project Description(include the project scope,length,purpose,and brief comparison of existing and proposed conditions): Please describe how or why the project relates to the transportation system(functional,proximity,or impact). Note:Projects must be primarily for transportation purposes rather than recreational purposes.Projects lacking a functional, proximity or impact linkage to the transportation system are not eligible. PE RW CN Other Estimated obligation date(mldlyy) Estimated completion date(mld/yy) Please provide a vicinity map,signed Project Endorsement Form,and Complete Streets Checklist. SRTC Staff ['Vicinity map ❑Endorsement ❑Complete Streets Checklist A.Previous obligations(all fund sources,all phases) $ Funding is requested for the following B.Requested TAP Funds $ phases(check all that apply): • C.Other secured federal funds,source: $ ❑Preliminary Engineering/Design D.Secured state funds,source: $ ❑Right-of-way E.Secured local funds,source: $ ❑Construction F.Secured private funds,source: $ ❑Other(planning,etc.) G.Total Estimated Cost of Project(All Phases)[A through F] $ Cost summary notes(optional).Please indicate if this project has received partial funds through a past SRTC Call for Projects. The project sponsor must verify that the project,once completed,will be maintained for the life of the project(include estimated life of project). EcONOM1G�7�rau�rr _ _ _ Please describe how the project enhances connections to existing key destinations(Le.employment centers,city/regional centers and attractions,schools,or parks)or major transportation routes and/or transportation hubs(including transit).Include the distance from the project location to any referenced key destinations. Note:Project must be located within%2 mile(pedestrian project)or 3 miles(bicycle project)of a key destination. RCIONAM—RM t :Vii _iln Is the project consistent with an adopted local economic development/revitalization plan?If so,please cite the plan and the page number that indicates the project is consistent with the plan. Project is located within an area of existing development.Please refer to the 2010 Population/Employment Density map to identify the density of the project location.Check all densities that apply to the project location(if it traverses more than one density type,an average score will be given). El Average density 2 El Above average density - 4 ❑High density 6 10 STS Please indicate the project's consistency with regional and Local plans.Check one box only: /The project is listed in SRTC's 2011-2035 Metropolitan Transportation Plan as: ❑A planned improvement(specifically listed in Section 4,pages 12-17); 5 ❑An unfunded transportation need (specifically listed in Section 4,pages 18-19); 3 ❑The project is not specifically listed,but is consistent with the goals and policies of the MTP(as described in Section 1). 1 Cite the page number and text that indicates consistency with the MTP: g The project is listed in a local agency long-range plan or capital improvement program as: ❑A programmed or planned improvement(specifically listed).Plan/program and page number: 3 z ❑An unfunded transportation need(specifically listed).Plan/program and page number: 1 ❑The project is not specifically listed in a plan or program,but is consistent with the goals and policies of the 0 comprehensive plan.Cite the page number and text that indicates consistency with the plan: The project is listed in an approved regional(SRTC)plan: ❑Spokane Regional Pedestrian Plan Page 3 ❑Spokane Regional Bike Plan Page 3 ❑Spokane Regional ITS Architecture Plan,Implementation Plan Page 3 ❑Other: Page 3 WWM a Is the project a joint venture between multiple jurisdictions and/or agencies?If so,please describe: 2 Please describe the extent to which the project has been reviewed by the public or other agencies(public meetings, 3 environmental review,legislative actions,etc). Does the project improve the environment or minuriize the environmental impact of the facility above and beyond current 3 design standards(Le.use of recycled materials,innovative storm water treatment,use of drought tolerant vegetation, air quality benefit,etc.)?If so,please describe. Describe the status of the project. ❑ Environmental documentation(NEPA)incomplete&approved,or categorically excluded(CE) 3 ❑ Right-of-way plans approved 9 ❑ Right-of-way acquisition is complete,or ndt needed 3 ❑ Design is 30%complete _ 5 point max. 1 ❑ Design is 60%complete 2 ❑ Design is 90%complete 3 Project status notes. Please indicate if there any circumstances that could delay the project and/or if there are any critical timelines associated with this application(e.g.right of way acquisition,environmental documentation,other funds needed for full funding). z_ Has the project previously been awarded partial funding through a SRTC Call for Projects? 2 QUAillTio Does the project include design elements that contribute to qualit. +lace mat_king.-if so,please check all that apply: 5 ❑ Lighting ❑Unusual or unique surfaces(pavers or stamped) ❑ Bicycle parking ❑Public art ❑ Benches,bus shelters - ❑Garbage/recycling receptacles ❑Traffic calming measures = ❑Ballards ❑ Landscaping,pots/planters,tree grates ❑ Other design elements,please describe: ❑ Raised or uniquely treated crosswalks Does the project support health-promoting transportation options for people of all abilities and ages(walking,biking,transit, 5 safe routes to school,etc.)?If so,please describe G 9ie a, Mos[tK_ j . T_v , - _ti.__3Q 1: Will the project add or improve pedestrian facilities(ADA requirements,crossings,completes a gap,extends connection,eliminates barriers,vegetated buffers,width>5 ft, pedestrian islands,etc.)?If so,please describe. 7 Is the facility on a designate icyclr e route? If yes;will the project add or improve bicycle facilities(lanes,pavement markings, signage,completes a gap,ex en s connection,eliminates barriers,etc.)?If so,please describe. = 7 Has the project been coordinated with STA or other transit operators?If so,please describe. 1 Does the project improve transit access?If so,please describe. Project must be within%2 mile(pedestrian projects)or 3 miles(bicycle projects)of a transit stop.Include the distance -- from the project location to the closest transit stop. If the project improves transit access,how many buses per day traverse the facility? Number of buses(include both inbound and outbound) ❑ 1-30 buses per day 3 ❑30+buses per day 6 /0 Project encourages or allows for the shared use of infrastructure for multiple users(Le.new shared use path,or the i' addition of facilities for a new user group on an existing facility). 4 Project serves low income and/or minority communities or establishes a new or enhances an existing transportation choice to the transportation disadvantaged.Please refer to the 2010 Environmental Justice map to determine whether the project is located in an area of disproportionately high percentages of low income and/or minority residents.Please check all classifications that apply to the project location(if it traverses more than one classification,an average score will be given). 5 ❑Average proportion of low income 1 ❑Average proportion of minorities 1 ❑Above average proportion of low income 3 ❑Above average proportion of minorities 3 ❑ High proportion of low income 5 ❑ High proportion of minorities 5 EittestintiraMfirerut Does the project address an existing safety concern(s)?If yes,please indicate the existing safety concern(s). ❑Collisions involving pedestrians,bicyclists ❑ Lack of separated facilities for user groups ❑Lack of safe pedestrian crossing ❑ High volumes/speeds on facility ❑Other safety concern: Does the project address the existing safety concern(s)via the one or more of the following strategies? ❑ Provides sidewalks/walkways and curb ramps ❑Add signage directed to improve safety concern ❑ Provides bike lanes,markings,signage ❑Install/improve traffic and bike/pedestrian signals ❑ Implement roadway narrowing measures ❑ Provide crosswalk enhancements(including striping,refuge islands, ❑Add traffic calming improvements raised medians) ❑Includes a safety education program(for Safe Routes to ❑Other safety improvements consistent with NCHRP 500: School Projects only) al `Lrn = y■'-_ o c -a c riI L E _ r:fi CO o 0 t, ca3 o C u� U cu 7,,.. : c :C -_ 0 E F-- "z: p r— c 4) Z.-,..,:- ',..,, z 0 m CO co C i 0 a a wus. .a) a = I �0 .4 0 .� :3 - ' E 0 0 U ` Fe o ti) m _ 1 `o c) o E :-€ a r 0 — ,: o �- o tyi u) Q. Q aj a O C 't7 O _�. Q i 4 E y-+ Q az� Cn 5 O Z 0 _U O = C O O I- (/) . N Q 0" :2 r 0 O C R 2$ •N 0 ,Q c... C6 - 0 OQ 0 C ." ={1f 'C •.._- 2 �O _ c 0 "8 a) i � Lw: .N z '2� N 0 _ =,"i z- A - 4) (6 a„_,. N 'x'a �, (gyp (� a) . 'a w-. C c 0 -�-- -- C Boivusa��urs � �_ — �s{MAx_ Does the project have partial funding(local,state,or federal)secured?If so,please indicate the percentage of the total project cost that is already secured. ❑0-5% 1 ❑5-10% 2 ❑10%+ 3 Project has demonstrated community support(letters of support from stakeholder groups andlor local jurisdictionslagencies). 3 • SRTC 1-1843 Almost Final DRAFT yl,,rffll_:eoiU»or7ittruYI'("I,;nCrAuvir 2014-2017 Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality (CMAQ) Project Application PROJECT TITLE: ER. ' . i Agency or Organization . ' Phone Number Contact Person Email Address Type of CMAQ Project Traffic Flow improvements ❑ Intelligent Transportation Systems(traffic Signal synchronization,traveler information,traffic signal control systems, incident management programs,etc.) ❑Traditional Traffic Flow Improvements(I-0V lanes,channelization,etc.) ❑Other CMAQ eligible traffic flow project Travel Demand Management ❑Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities and Programs ❑Transit Improvements ❑Carpooling and Vanpooling ❑Public Education and Outreach Activities ❑Other CMAQ eligible travel demand management project'':` PM10 Reductions::; El Paving Dirt Roads:::;;:; 111 Purchasing Street Sweepers El:Diesel Engine Retrofits! :__;.. El Other CMAQ eligible PMoreductions project Project Location Project Description(2000 character max.) Include the project scope,length,purpose,and brief comparison of existing and proposed conditions. Please describe how or why the project relates to the transportation system(functional,proximity,or impact). Projects must be primarily for transportation purposes rather than recreational purposes. Projects lacking a functional,proximity or impact linkage to the transportation system are not eligible. SRTC Congestion Mitigation&Air Quality Project Application FFY 2014-2017 1 Complete Streets Checklist ❑Submitted ❑ Project Exempt riajWil t AMZ iaW I PE RW CN Other �✓ ,v Estimated obligation date(m/dlyy) Estimated completion date(mld/yy) • ir10)I y ern .:rte �.3..-'`.£3 may-a%.... a �*+ =«,,. ..d . s�='" 1 Please provide a vicinity map and a signed Project Endorsement Form attached to this application. SRTC Staff ❑Vicinity map ❑Endorsement gfa,.r f y/ nom'' R 'T„�,- :f lam' ��.�a5F ,.- i W A.Previous obligations(all fund sources,all phases) $ Funding is requested for the following B.Requested CMAQ Funds $ - - phases(check all That apply): C,Other secured federal funds,source: $ D.Secured state funds,source: $ ❑ Preliminary Engineering/Design E. Secured local funds,source: $ -❑Right-of-way F.Secured private funds,source: - $ ❑ Construction G.Total Estimated Cost of Project(All Phases)[A through Fj ❑Other(planning,etc.) Cost summary notes(if additional explanation is needed). Describe the commitment of matching funds and other funds or the status of obtaining the proposed matching funds. (Note:matching funds must be available at the time of fund obligation). 5 3 What is the design life of this project? The project sponsor must indicate that the project,once completed,will be maintained for the life of the project. Please complete the appropriate supplemental application form for the project type(see Appendix A) ❑Submitted SRTC Congestion Mitigation &Air Quality Project Application FFY 2014-2017 2 -0: 1,9 A III - IV )RJ :'-‘,4I9t q- 1r __a�= == Y ®4 Please describe how the project enhance connections to existing employment centers,key destinations(Le.employment centers,schools,parks,retail,city/regional centers and attractions),major transportation routes and/or transportation hubs (including transit), k5 alb .D i alm]IlY7fit J --=-- —' Project is located within an area of existing development, (Density of housing/jobs in proximity) jrTa 7 E v Vk jV if fat}itAt'l:i i ki 'i - 5 Jsc y �3a� . f. The project is listed in SRTC's 2011-2035 Metropolitan Transportation Plan as: ❑A planned improvement(specifically listed in Section 4,pages 12-17); 5 ❑An unfunded transportation need(specifically listed in Section 4,pages 18-19); 3 ❑The project is not specifically listed,but is consistent with the goals and policies of the MTP(as 1 described in Section 1).Cite the page number and text that indicates consistency with the MTP: The project is listed in a local agency long-range plan or capital improvement program:as ❑A programmed or planned improvement(specifically listed).:PianIprogram`and page number: 3 ill An unfunded transportation need(specifically listed Plan/program and page number: 2 ❑The project is not specifically listed in a plan or program,but is'consistent with the goals and policies of the plan or program.Cite the page number and text that indicates consistency with the plan or program: The project.is listed in an approved regional(SRTC)plan: Spokane Regional Pedestrian Plan Date&Page 3 El Spokane Regional Bike Plan ; Date&Page 3 ❑Spokane Regional ITS Architecture Plan, Implementation Plan Date&Page 3 ❑Other(Please Explain): Date&Page 3 NA it, Is the project a joint venture between multiple jurisdictions and/or agencies(including private and/or financial partnerships)? If so,please describe: Please describe the extent to which the project has been reviewed by the public or other agencies(public meetings, environmental review,legislative actions,etc). SRTC Congestion Mitigation &Air Quality Project Application FFY 2014-2017 3 p' (�7� pedi�Iy�' yam' Does the project improve the environment or minimize the environmental impact of the facility above and beyond current design standards(i.e.use of recycled materials,innovative storm water treatment,use of drought tolerant vegetation,etc.)?If so,please describe. Describe the status of the project. ❑Environmental documentation(NEPA)is complete&approved,or categorically excluded(CE) 5 ❑Right-of-way plans approved ❑ Right-of-way acquisition is complete,or not needed 5 point 5 [' Design is 30%complete maximum [' Design is 60%complete 2 ['Design is 90%complete 3 Project status notes.Please indicate if there any circumstances that could delay this project and if there are any critical timelines associated with this application(e.g.right of way acquisition,environmental documentation,other funds needed for full funding). j Y e oW, t f ®I I v' vi -i- s,x,at3� WFVrg-S. i,;*`I*-7i.,--�,' ,> `-`"'--rte_.-,--f v�-"'3'u'i- j9 T ^sue Has the project received federal funding from SRTC in the 1t pt�Ai'o,,-t l.e I-a Ly A 00 b,t2�.' .r,�.�r�.�",y. -i�''}'_"JS.,t _�-.�'Y ✓� .i,, -.ru: ,�..,�..'.._�--"'--�-n_,.}�-'r- -_`_J.i.��$ r Project serves low:income and/or minority communities;provides a new or enhances an existing transportation choice to the transportation disadvantaged. Project must start/end/go through a Census tract with higher than County-average proportions of low income and/or minority populations. SRTC Congestion Mitigation &Air Quality Project Application FFY 2014-2017 4 MEMO TO: Mike Jackson, City Manager FROM: Rick VanLeuven, Chief of Police DATE: February 11, 2013 RE: Monthly Report January 2013 January 2013: January 2012: CAD incidents: 4,384 CAD incidents: 4,423 Reports taken: 1,898 Reports taken: 1,865 Traffic stops: 918 Traffic stops: 1,212 Traffic reports: 335 Traffic reports: 377 CAD incidents indicate calls for service as well as self-initiated officer contacts. Hot spot maps are attached showing January residential burglaries, traffic collisions, vehicle prowlings, and stolen vehicles. Also attached are trend-line graphs for 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013: Citations, Spokane Valley Dispatched Calls, Self-Initiated Calls, Collisions, Persons Crimes, Property Crimes, and Sex Crimes. Also included is the January Crimes By Cities stats report. This report reflects incidents that occurred in a specific city to which a deputy from Spokane County took the courtesy report. For instance, an individual may have had his car stolen in Airway Heights, and he waited until he returned home in the Newman Lake to make a report. In 2011, we switched from UCR to NIBRS classification. As a result, certain crimes were broken down to their violation parts for NIBRS and each part is now counted. Consequently, comparing certain crimes before 2011 to crimes during or after 2011 is not possible using the graphs. The crimes that are impacted by the NIBRS classification changes and should not be compared to prior graphs include: Adult Rape, Assault, Forgery and Theft. ADMINISTRATIVE: Chief Van Leuven attended an Active Shooter Training Seminar at the Spokane Valley Mall. This training was attended by employees of the various retail stores at the mall. The training was very much appreciated by those who attended and many inquired if it would be given again so others from their stores could attend. Chief Van Leuven attended a one-day training on Investigating and Responding to Officer-Involved Shootings, at the Sheriff's Training Center. Page 1 Chief Van Leuven met with Erin Williams of Lutheran Community Services and toured their facility. Erin just recently became the Director of Advocacy & Prevention at LCS. SVPD has been a long-time community partner with Lutheran Community Services and the Drug Endangered Children Program. Near the end of January, Chief Van Leuven had the privilege of being on the Fire Chief Interview Panel for Spokane Valley Fire. Candidates for the Fire Chief position were interviewed and evaluated, enabling the panel to select a replacement for Mike Thompson, who retires in February 2013. Chief VanLeuven attended the SCRAPS Press Conference w/City of Spokane, Spokane Valley and County officials. Kevin Miller of the Secret Service made arrangements for a representative from Washington D.C. headquarters to meet with Chief VanLeuven at the end of January. The Secret Service has an office inspection/review every three years and part of the review process is for inspectors to meet with local law enforcement partners to gauge their effectiveness. Chief VanLeuven expressed to the representative that the Sheriff's Office enjoyed an excellent relationship with the Secret Services and find them ready to assist law enforcement, when the need arises. Quarterly leadership training for the Sheriff's Office was held mid-January, which Chief VanLeuven, Lt. Lyons, and other upper management attended. He also attended quarterly in-service training this month. Chief VanLeuven was on call one week during the month of January. COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING: S.C.O.P.E. participated in the following events during the month of January: ➢ GSSAC Coalition Meeting; ➢ Walking School Bus Training (working with elementary schools); ➢ S.C.O.P.E. Basic Training (9 new Volunteers); ➢ SIRT (S.C.O.P.E. Incident Response Team); ➢ CERT (Community Emergency Response Team)meeting; and, ➢ Operation Family ID. January 2013 Volunteers Hours per station: Location #Volunteers Admin Hours L.E. Hours Total Hours Central Valley 10 591 107 698 Edgecliff 32 728 36 764 Trentwood 5 159 64 223 University 22 442 313 755 TOTALS 69 1920 520 2440 Volunteer Value ($21.62 per hour) $52,752.80 for January 2013 S.C.O.P.E. Incident Response Team (SIRT)volunteers contributed 44 on-scene hours (including travel time) in January, responding to crime scenes, motor vehicle accidents and providing traffic control. Of those hours, 17 hours were for incidents in Spokane Valley. Total January volunteer hours Page 2 contributed by SIRT, including training, stand-by, response and special events is 531; year-to-date total is 531 hours. S.C.O.P.E. DISABLED PARKING ACTIVITY REPORT City of Spokane Valley # of # of Hrs #of Disabled #of #of Non- Vol. Infractions Warnings Disabled Issued Issued Infractions Issued January 6 123 22 0 0 Total 6 123 22 0 0 Spokane County # of #of Hrs #of Disabled #of #of Non- Vol. Infractions Warnings Disabled Issued Issued Infractions Issued January 2 2 0 0 0 Total 2 2 0 0 0 There were 38 reports of juveniles who ran away from their residence in Spokane Valley during the month of January 2013, 3 of which remain unsettled. There were a couple juveniles who ran away from a group home together numerous times during the month, contributing to the high number of juvenile runaway reports. Approximately one-third of the runaway incidents were from group homes. Abandoned vehicles tagged by S.C.O.P.E. volunteers for impoundment in Spokane Valley in December totaled 9 and in January 14 with 4 vehicles in December and 4 in January, respectively, eventually cited and towed. Seven hulks were processed in December and 18 hulks processed in January. During the month of January, a total of 62 vehicles were processed; the total for 2013 to date is 62. OPERATIONS: Driver of a Stolen Vehicle Rams Patrol Car— In early January,just after 1:10 a.m., Spokane Valley Sheriff's deputies arrested two occupants of a stolen vehicle after the driver rammed a Spokane Valley Patrol car, ending a pursuit in the area of Pines and Broadway in the Spokane Valley. Spokane Valley Sheriff's Deputy Juan Rodriguez observed a 2002 Ford Explorer in the area of Argonne and Mission. He checked the vehicle's license plate and confirmed the vehicle was reported stolen on 12/31/12. He turned in behind the vehicle and followed it southbound on Argonne. When additional deputies arrived, he attempted to stop the vehicle on Argonne north of Sprague but the driver immediately accelerated. With the roads almost completely void of other vehicles, the driver continued to try and evade the deputies reaching speeds of 60 to 80 mph during the pursuit. When the vehicle turned east on Broadway from Pines, Deputy Rodriguez attempted a successful Pursuit Intervention Technique (PIT), which caused the vehicle to spin and stop facing west on Broadway. Deputy Seth Berrow, who was just behind Deputy Rodriguez, turned onto Broadway and slowed almost to a stop. Both deputies planned to position their vehicles to block any escape, but the suspect accelerated again and rammed the front of Deputy Berrow's fully-marked Patrol car. Deputy Rodriguez pulled in behind the Page 3 suspect's vehicle that now appeared to be stuck on the bumper and hood area of Deputy Berrow's vehicle. The two male occupants were taken into custody without further incident. The driver was charged with Attempting to Elude a Peace Officer, Assault 1st Degree, Possession of a Controlled Substance-Methamphetamine and Possession of a Stolen Vehicle, all felonies. The passenger was arrested for an outstanding misdemeanor warrant for Theft 3rd. Both were transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for the noted charges. Deputy Berrow appeared to be sore after the collision, but thankfully was not injured more severely. Stolen Firearm Located - In early January, at 11:00 p.m., Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputies stopped a vehicle near Fancher and Sharp for multiple traffic infractions. When deputies contacted the male driver, they saw he was shaking and very nervous. When asked why he was so nervous, the male told deputies he was a convicted felon and police made him nervous. After a driver's check, deputies learned his driving status was suspended. Deputies also asked the male if he had any weapons inside his vehicle, since he was a convicted felon and prohibited from possessing firearms. After slight hesitation, the male suspect told deputies he was holding onto a rifle for a friend and that it was in the trunk of his vehicle. The male suspect gave deputies permission to search the vehicle and a Browning .308 caliber rifle was located in the trunk. A check through dispatch showed the rifle was stolen during a residential burglary earlier in the month. Deputies also located methamphetamine in the center console. When questioned about the rifle, the only information the male suspect would provide was that he was holding the rifle for "a friend." No other information was provided. Deputies contacted the owner of the firearm who said she had no idea who the male suspect was and that there were three firearms stolen from her residence. The male suspect was booked into the Spokane County Jail for the charges of Possession of a Controlled Substance (methamphetamine), Possession of a Stolen Firearm, Unlawful Possession of a Firearm and Driving While License Suspended Third Degree. Vehicle Prowler Arrested - In early January, at about 5:00 a.m., Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputies responded to the 2100 block of North Pines Road reference a vehicle prowling call. Customers at the convenience store provided a description of the suspect and told an employee the suspect was prowling vehicles in the parking lot. Deputies quickly arrived on scene and saw a male in the parking lot. The male suspect matched the description provided by the employee. When deputies attempted to contact him, he placed his hand in his pocket and started to walk away from them. Once it was confirmed the male suspect was the individual who was prowling vehicles, deputies ordered him to stop. The male suspect continued to ignore deputies and began reaching in his waistband. Worried the suspect may be reaching for a weapon, deputies attempted to physically detain him. While attempting to detain the male suspect, deputies realized he had a knife on his person. A taser application was applied and he was eventually placed in handcuffs. A knife was located in the suspect's pocket after he was placed under arrest as well as a baggie of methamphetamine. The male suspect was booked into the Spokane County Jail for the charges of Possession of a Controlled Substance (methamphetamine), Obstructing and Resisting Arrest. Driver's Untruths Lead to his Arrest - In mid-January, Spokane Valley Sheriff's Deputy Karnitz observed two occupied vehicles parked next to each other in the parking lot of a closed business just before 11p.m. in the area of Pines and Boone in the Spokane Valley. After checking one of the license plates, he observed the registered owner of the vehicle was listed as having several active felony warrants and his driver's license was suspended. He contacted the driver who stated he did not have identification on him, but gave Deputy Karnitz a name and date of birth; he was, however, unable to provide additional information most people would know. Believing the male wasn't being truthful, Deputy Karnitz asked for additional units and checked driver's license photos on his computer. From Page 4 the photos, he confirmed the male appeared to be the registered owner, a 32-year-old male. With Deputy Hilton and WSP Trooper Britton now at the scene to assist, Deputy Karnitz told the male suspect to exit the vehicle twice. The suspect revved the engine, put the vehicle in gear and sped away, initiating a pursuit. The male suspect continued at speeds up to 50-60 mph on the mostly unoccupied roads as he tried to evade the deputies. When he went through the intersection at Broadway and Mullan, he ran over a set of spike strips deployed by Sgt. Dave Ellis. He continued westbound on Broadway as the vehicle's passenger side tire lost air. With the tire now flat, he pulled into a business parking lot on Broadway and Lake Rd. and stopped. He was taken into custody without further incident. The male suspect gave consent to search his vehicle and a pair of"brass" knuckles, which are illegal to possess in Washington and an unloaded pellet gun were located. The male suspect was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for a felony charge of Attempting to Elude,misdemeanor charges of Making False or Misleading Statements, Possession of a Dangerous Weapon and Driving with a Suspended License 3rd. He was also booked on three out-of- county felony warrants and one local misdemeanor warrant for DV Assault. Robbery Investigation - Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputies are investigating a robbery that took place during the morning school hours in the parking lot of Progress Elementary on Broadway in Spokane Valley. At about 11:15 a.m., the female victim called 911 and said she was assaulted in the parking lot and that the suspect took her cell phone and purse. The victim told deputies she had walked her niece into the school. She said when she walked back out to her vehicle in the parking lot, she opened the driver's side door and was struck in the back of her neck with an unknown object. The victim said she was knocked to the ground, saw the suspect take her cell phone and purse out of her vehicle and run southbound on Progress Road. The victim said the suspect was possibly a white male in his late 20's wearing a dark jacket,jeans and a baseball cap. The victim was treated and released at the scene by paramedics. Several deputies set up a perimeter in the area and a Sheriffs K-9 unit tracked south of the school. The suspect was not located. Crime Stoppers is offering a cash reward for any information leading to an arrest in this robbery. Persons with information should call the Crime Stoppers Tip Line at 1-800-222-TIPS, or should forward the tip via the Internet website www.crimestoppersinlandnorthwest.org. Tipsters do not have to give their name to collect the cash reward. Crime Stoppers of the Inland Northwest is a civilian organization that promotes public safety by paying cash rewards for information that solves crimes. It is not affiliated with law enforcement. Road Rage Shooting — In mid-January, at 6:30 a.m., Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputy Griffin Criswell responded to a drive-by shooting call in the area of 8th and Dishman Mica. The adult male victim told 911 he was no longer at the scene and was available for contact at his place of employment. The victim told Deputy Criswell he had been behind the suspect's vehicle at the northbound stop light on Dishman Mica and Schafer. He said the suspect was having a difficult time accelerating on the snow when the signal turned green, so he decided to change lanes and go around the vehicle. The victim said when they reached the northbound stop light at Dishman Mica and 8th, he saw the 46-year-old male suspect, waiving a handgun at him. The suspect's vehicle was in the outside lane on the passenger side of the victim's vehicle. The victim said he did not respond to the male suspect and that when the signal turned green, he saw the suspect reach out his window and shoot at the front passenger tire of his vehicle. Although shaken, the victim was able to write down the license plate number of the suspect's vehicle. Through his investigation, Deputy Criswell was able to locate a phone number for the male suspect and arranged a meeting with him. The suspect admitted he did in fact shoot the victim's tire. His reason was that the victim had cut him off nearly putting him in the ditch. The male suspect gave Deputy Criswell the .22 caliber Ruger Mark II pistol used to shoot the victims vehicle. The male suspect was booked into Spokane County Jail on the felony charge of Drive-By-Shooting. Page 5 Sheriffs K9 Brax Locates Burglar - In the early morning hours of mid-January, Spokane Valley Corporal J. Shover saw a Power City Electric van pull into Sullivan Park located north of the Spokane River on Sullivan Road. Cpl. Shover watched the van park next to a sedan that was parked in the parking lot. Due to the time of night and location the vehicles were parked, Cpl. Shover attempted to contact the driver of the van. Before Cpl. Shover approached the van, the 48-year-old male driver exited from the driver's seat and ran eastbound across Sullivan Road. The male jumped a fence on the west side of Central Pre-Mix and ran south through Central Pre-Mix property. Cpl. Shover requested K9 assistance and Sheriffs K9 Brax and his handler responded to the scene. K9 Brax located the male suspect nearly a mile away from the van hiding under a pile of brush in the Sullivan Business Park. The male suspect was taken into custody without incident. Cpl. Shover looked inside the Power City Electric van and could see several large spools of copper in the back. A supervisor at Power City said the van had been parked at a nearby business and was certain the male suspect was not a Power City employee. The investigation is on-going and additional felony charges are expected. The male suspect was booked into the Spokane County Jail for the felony charge of 2nd Degree Burglary. Copper Theft Investigation — In mid-January 2013, at about 3:45 a.m., Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputies responded to a transformer fire at an Avista substation at Barker and Euclid. Spokane Valley Fire had responded to a transformer fire at the substation and saw the fence surrounding the station had been cut open. Deputies found a large opening in the fence and were able to see footprints leading into the substation. An Avista employee responded to the scene and told deputies a ground wire had been cut and removed from the transformer on fire. The employee said that removing the ground charged the transformer with over 7,500 volts of electricity causing it to ignite. The employee said the suspect(s) more than likely were burned from cutting the ground. Several other ground lines were removed inside the station. Avista reported there were approximately 2,165 customers who were without service in the Barker/Euclid area for a short period of time as a result of the incident. Anyone with information regarding this incident is asked to call Crime Check at 509-456-2233. Driver's Misinformation Suspends His Evening Activities — In mid-January at 9:45 p.m., Spokane Valley Sheriff's Deputy Clay Hilton observed a Chevy truck in the area of East 14th Ave. and South Herald. After checking the vehicle's license plate, he learned the registered owner of the vehicle had a suspended driving status in Washington. Deputy Hilton stopped the vehicle and contacted the 37- year-old male driver who matched the physical description of the registered owner. Deputy Hilton confirmed the male was the driver and asked him why he was driving to which the driver responded, "It's not a crime to drive." Deputy Hilton asked the male to exit the vehicle and informed him he was under arrest for Driving While License Suspended 3rd. After he was in custody, the male continued to explain to Deputy Hilton he didn't think he could be arrested for driving with a suspended license and only believed he would only receive a ticket. During a search of the male after his arrest, Deputy Hilton located a clear plastic baggie in his pocket which contained a white crystalline substance Deputy Hilton recognized, from his training and experience, as methamphetamine. Deputy Tyler Kullman, who arrived to assist, contacted the female passenger in an attempt to check her driving status to see if the male's vehicle could possibly be released to her. At first, she provided a false name to Deputy Kullman, but she was eventually identified. Deputy Kullman placed her in custody for Making False/Misleading Statements and three outstanding Spokane County warrants for Driving While License Suspended 3rd. Deputies also found clear plastic baggies on her person after her arrest; one containing a small amount of a white crystalline substance believed to be methamphetamine. Both the driver and passenger were transported to the Spokane County Jail where an additional plastic baggie containing a white crystalline substance was located on the female passenger during a more extensive search by Spokane County Corrections Deputy Michelle Mossoni. The male suspect was Page 6 charged with Felony Possession of a Controlled Substance and Misdemeanor Driving While License Suspended 3rd. The female was booked for Felony Possession of a Controlled Substance, a Misdemeanor for Making False/Misleading Statements and her three warrants. The white crystalline substances found on the two suspects were field tested and all showed a presumptive positive reading for methamphetamine. Driver of Stolen Vehicle Caught by Spokane Valley Sheriff's Deputies — In late January, just before 2:15 a.m., Spokane Valley Sheriff's Deputy C. Sciortino observed a 1995 Honda Accord, with one male occupant, in front of his marked patrol vehicle as they travelled northbound on McDonald from Broadway Avenue. Deputy Sciortino checked the vehicle's license plate on his in-car computer and received notification it was reported stolen from Ephrata Washington on 01/23/2013. As he moved closer to confirm the license plate number again, the driver accelerated heavily reaching speeds of 50 mph on McDonald as he tried to evade Deputy Sciortino who had activated his lights and siren. With other vehicle traffic very light at this time of the morning, the pursuit continued east on Mission and south on Sullivan Road reaching speeds of up to 60 mph. The driver lost control of the vehicle as he travelled south on Sullivan, south of Sprague Avenue and struck a light pole stopping in the northbound lanes of Sullivan. The driver exited the vehicle and ran southbound. Deputy N. Bohanek caught up to the suspect, after a short foot pursuit, as he tried to scale a chain-link fence east of the 200 block of S. Sullivan Road. The 33-year-old male suspect was taken into custody by deputies without further incident. During a search after his arrest, deputies located a vial containing a white crystalline substance in his front pants pocket. The substance was tested and showed a presumptive positive reading for methamphetamine. The male suspect was treated and released by medical staff and transported to the Spokane County Jail. He was booked for Possession of a Stolen Motor Vehicle, Attempting to Elude and Possession of a Controlled Substance (Methamphetamine). He was also charged with the following misdemeanors: Obstructing a Peace Officer, Hit & Run (Unattended Property) and Driving While License Suspended 3rd Slick Roads and a Suspended License Equals a Bad Idea — In late January at 10:45 p.m., Spokane Valley Sheriff's Sergeant Dave Ellis stopped a 1998 Ford Mustang in the area of Freya and Olive after he observed the driver accelerate rapidly, fishtail and start sliding sideways on Freya. He contacted the 40-year-old male driver, who admitted he was driving too fast for the conditions and he did not have a valid driver's license. Sergeant Ellis checked the male's driving status and found his Washington driving privileges were indeed suspended and placed him in custody. A tow truck was requested to impound the vehicle since there was no known licensed driver to take possession and the male suspect was unwilling to identify the male passenger in the vehicle to see if he possessed a valid driver's license. Around the time the tow service arrived, Sergeant Ellis was contacted by a female who identified herself as the male driver's wife and identified the male passenger. Sergeant Ellis positively identified the 21-yeal-old male suspect and found he had two confirmed Spokane County warrants for Delivery of a Controlled Substance and Driving While License Suspended 3rd Degree. The younger male suspect was re-contacted and searched after his arrest by Deputy Chad Eaton who had arrived at the location to assist. During the search, Deputy Eaton located a clear baggie containing several smaller baggies commonly used to transport and distribute illegal drugs in the male's pants pocket. Deputy Getchell conducted a search of the vehicle and located a clear plastic baggie containing a tan crystal- like substance between the passenger's seat and the center console. The substance was tested and showed a presumptive positive reading for methamphetamine. The male driver and his young male passenger were both transported to the Spokane County Jail. The driver was booked for a misdemeanor charge of Driving While License Suspended 3rd. The passenger was booked for a new felony charge of Possession of a Controlled Substance along with his warrants. Page 7 Fast Response Helps Recover Stolen Vehicle — In late January at 11:30 p.m., Spokane Valley Sheriff's Deputy J. Karnitz heard a call broadcast over the radio regarding a 1994 Honda Prelude reported as stolen five minutes earlier from a residence in the 11900 block of East Frederick. Deputy Karnitz started driving east on Trent toward the area the vehicle was reported stolen in an attempt to locate it. Within minutes, Deputy Karnitz observed a Honda travelling westbound matching the description of the one reported stolen and another vehicle behind it. Deputy Karnitz turned around, caught up to the vehicle as it continued travelling west on Trent and confirmed it was the Honda being reported. Waiting for additional units to assist, Deputy Karnitz continued to follow the vehicle at a distance. The Honda turned onto Mission from Trent and the driver began to accelerate and drive recklessly as he passed two vehicles. With the Honda's speed in excess of 60 mph and the reckless actions of the driver, Deputy Karnitz activated his emergency lights and siren in an attempt to stop the vehicle. Deputy Karnitz tried to keep up with the vehicle as the driver began turning on several streets in an attempt to escape on the wet and slushy roads. Travelling west on Sharp, Deputy Karnitz lost sight of the Honda near Pittsburg. He slowed, turned off his lights and siren and began checking the area for the vehicle. Minutes later, Spokane Police Department Sergeant King, who was in the area to assist, located the unoccupied Honda crashed into a garage in an alleyway behind a residence in the 2100 block of East Sinto. Sergeant King advised there was one set of footprints in the snow leading away from the open driver's door. Additional SCSO and SPD units arrived in the area and began to setup a containment perimeter. A Spokane Police K9 unit arrived and began to track the suspect as he ran northeast. A short time later, SPD Officer Schneider advised he was contacting a 21-year-old male suspect. The male's face was flush and he appeared to be out of breath and sweating. The K9 unit continued with the track, which led to the location the male was being detained, as did the single set of footprints in the snow. The male suspect declined to talk to Deputy Karnitz or answer questions about the incident. He was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for felony charges of Attempting to Elude, Possession of a Stolen Vehicle and misdemeanor charges of Hit and Run- Property Damage and Driving While License Suspended 211d. The vehicle did sustain some damage, but was drivable and released to the owner at the scene. Spokane County Sheriff's deputies and Spokane Police officers did a great job working together to arrest this vehicle theft suspect, ensure the safety of the citizens in the area, and return the stolen vehicle to its owner. This was Deputy Karnitz's 3rd Stolen Vehicle recovery of the night!! Salvation Army Target Of Scam -An adult, Native American female has been contacting businesses in Spokane, Colville, Tri-Cities and Post Falls requesting scrap metal and or batteries for the Salvation Army. The woman has been described as heavy set driving an older white station wagon. This individual is telling businesses she is recycling the items for the Salvation Army and that the proceeds are being used to fund different types of children's programs. This is not true. The Salvation Army does not do any type of door-to-door solicitation. If you are contacted by this individual or anyone asking for donations at your residence or place of employment, please contact Crime Check at 509- 456-2233. Vanessa Reed posted on Spokane Valley Police Department's timeline "I wish to extend my Gratitude for going above and beyond in assisting me in a public service. I cant imagine what you go thru each day and only pray you are kept safe on your calls of duty.Thank you Officer G...and Officer S... Always v" Page 8 2013 JANUARY CRIME REPORT To date: Yearly totals: Jan-13 Jan-12 2013 2012 2,012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 BURGLARY 82 60 82 60 1062 1027 936 725 753 584 FORGERY 80 76 80 76 826 593 341 297 354 365 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 131 133 131 133 1770 1566 1183 1245 893 1,265 NON-CRIMINAL 12 11 12 11 108 160 917 892 944 839 PROPERTY OTHER 110 94 110 94 1236 1126 837 933 828 890 RECOVERED VEHICLES 57 60 57 60 446 416 365 187 319 343 STOLEN VEHICLES 67 70 67 70 586 566 496 298 496 478 THEFT 263 227 263 227 2636 2512 2365 2162 1,846 1,881 VEHICLE OTHER 23 18 23 18 287 195 3 5 7 3 VEHICLE PROWLING 110 91 110 91 1165 1491 1395 920 1069 682 TOTAL PROPERTY CRIMES 935 840 935 840 10,328 9,615 8,852 7,668 7,513 7,338 ASSAULT 72 86 72 86 936 963 895 927 869 853 DOA/SUICIDE 24 20 24 20 256 213 188 210 269 221 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 62 34 62 34 600 714 1297 1226 1063 874 HOMICIDE 0 0 0 0 2 3 1 3 3 1 KIDNAP 2 0 2 0 17 15 16 21 16 23 MENTAL 24 30 24 30 270 253 289 310 360 350 MP 10 12 10 12 154 125 128 115 95 83 PERSONS OTHER 280 266 280 266 3112 2484 1692 1621 1,354 1,337 ROBBERY 5 4 5 4 79 98 68 75 71 60 TELEPHONE HARASSMENT 18 13 18 13 212 162 153 159 95 73 TOTAL MAJOR CRIMES 497 465 497 465 5638 4997 4727 4,667 4,195 3,875 ADULT RAPE 6 11 6 11 89 67 44 35 44 43 CHILD ABUSE 0 5 0 5 27 89 115 159 148 104 CUSTODIAL INTERFERENCE 10 17 10 17 190 184 206 157 86 92 SEX REGISTRATION F 0 0 0 0 8 2 1 2 3 4 INDECENT LIBERTIES 3 3 3 3 27 17 8 10 11 18 RAPE/CHILD 1 2 1 2 13 23 28 35 39 31 RUNAWAY 41 65 41 65 530 510 490 440 369 295 SEX OTHER 1 1 1 1 38 56 215 211 179 194 STALKING 5 1 5 1 24 19 18 15 21 17 SUSPICIOUS PERSON 34 34 34 34 424 341 215 175 142 152 TOTAL SEX CRIMES 101 139 101 139 1370 1294 1387 1271 1,108 996 TOTAL ITF 30 44 30 44 430 521 542 671 838 808 TOTAL TRAFFIC REPORTS 335 377 335 377 3957 3569 3081 3,183 3,811 3,800 TOTAL REPORTS RECEIVED 1,898 1,865 1,898 1,865 21,723 19,996 18,589 17,460 17,465 16,817 O N C) O O O O N N N N f 1 I ifi • 7' U 0 > • O z I- • U O CD w To • • w > u) 0 c cv 0 lit* D U) iii _i H 0 • D c M O E) L cQ U ct 7 • Q Et X • • Q \ 2 co w w X. 1•1 Q 4 r O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 Lc) o Lc) o Lc) N N O N C) O O O O N N N N X i) II ill w 0 • O z i- >+ • U O CL • L M CO • D Q L i. 0 E • O U 0 0 C MI Y O (0 \ < Q • > '- \• Q • Et m w • �t Q 4 o Lo o Lo o Lo o Lo o cr co co N N O N C) O O O O N N N N f i) t il • 0 1 • 0 z • 0 0_ • u) U 3 r) Q t c. - cc co • D 6 \ , >+ a) (7 z > D a) c al o Y Q < � � 2 ct • Q ct r\s _■ W LL z • Q O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Lt) o Lt) o Lt) o Lt) co co N N O N Co O O O O N bN N N • i T I 0 • • uJ 0 0 z i- 0 0 Z - _O a J • uJ J O 0 0 0 • Q L u 4' . _1 W W Z Y O • <a • • a Q ct a 2 m w u_ • • Q oO O O O O O O Lc) O Ln O Lc) M N N O N C) O O O O N N N N f I ili 0 W 0 • O I/ z • O 0_ w co 0 E OU • Q C CO L CD 0 a • D CD WI > \ CD • D C CO Y O 4 < Ct 6 Q Ct • 2 • w Z /1 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Lt) o Lt) o Lt) o Lt) cr co co N N O N CO O O O O N fiS N N N III 0 W 0 > 0 z 1- • 0 0 W N a) E U • Q L a) a O L • D a a) 7) a) Iii D • c al O a >- 2 ♦ • X 0_ d Q 4 Et I II m • W W • •• Q r O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O 00 co Lo co N CI) O N- N C) O O O O O O N N N N N • I I I ,� U O W 0• O z i- E • U O 1 w • 7 ■ w C u) 0 c _ ), • •ii D 0 Q ca F. ti a � cn CD Z •4 • D CD C CC Y . Q O 2 Q Ct d Q Ct Q 2 m w t) u_ Z • 0 Q 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lt) 0 Lt) 0 Lt) 0 Lt) co co N N N- O N Cr) O O O O N N N N X (11) 111 Ili 0 • • W 0 • O Z -14 • • 0 • a) E N• 'L U Q a) J >+ • D a) Y O Q • Q II • N Q 2 W • • Q 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (o Lf) co N CI) O N- N CO O O O O O O N N N N N • f : f • ■ U W 0 /• • z • • H U O w '• 1 W C) C , ' CO 0 ► J _� To a) • • D C CO i O 4 fr • • Q X • • o_ d Q ct • • • < 'AI IS • w • • Q 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a) 00 N. co Lo co N • i �I9 uoly i sp J >r � (qua{ E , 1�1 0 ._ ,"I N M J Ifmlargl 6 MI 211 IL ; 1� I a 11:1 ref �l ua�uEg �to_, Y� c 1,.C. AR a+ s.GREY _\\� Q-ei`�`Jet�+'1�� say EUaa� \ uua-,H _ uapg :7e� �� .UO a1PPc : .1 !cal t ,(al.,-Ps1 u� wince Art 7S 1. EW Mop.,u CIS VI Yt'YfL 111!y 1fi , a / •5 Pier Vc ... � [�-.� dill ��m ��i ° !_ i O F]IL7'Ci 7_ S '7 I 'I , ��r��a ■ v AE7 . • _ lii-� m pi, * az �I�li � � �II��1 'IPPON% i O.� 1 ("grill--ti 111 «I�� l To win iga ` . 1� ll 1011115 111, i_ iiL• Dul-{ W ■�� F 1_I��111 �1111�../ � �RR��I�I�I..`; ��M�o `� ..1 A� i _ 1111 :fr' �3� �Q:�Ll �L= ¢��[; l_v J. �, 11,. .. 1111 :011 /��'V' '.. •�1 IlO51pE O E O •�/ �.i i . a � INII Ii iI 1 EREE IPIF ��toq, W Q of a c = ■J ., dl aka - t ~a o 111 r. . !�■a� �E� �. �11�� -�J�_1� �� E 't% - ' ``� - mol 611^1111 rr f 1II ; E 1 X1111111111111111 a /�E E 1 !!i1 a1 �o l!!�ln1■1111101�71m1111ie, • swot Q` . co , I"I 1'�� ■.riorrJ.reliL`IE7� �1J ooh � `-, V _ „ .itisamcm. ... ,FI . ..1•411 - .„,et:e4 IL A >■ PI T ra ci �.�� III _ �L�Jr�� / °a. - �, �/orch 41 ��' 1,�,mBI■■11■I_I'/'el o. `_ Sl� l.-�a r:•.=IIL .•9aaiE4a5 — trl �� 0 ■■�■■■�■ r •11 ul� �-- -- ■■a�■r 111�1� ; 1�. `� 11k1 i a M 4, 11211111 iGk1\ - 0 �7■■ r� rrl �� mm\11111\ � . .–II�IfiL11 O cNi 0 llama. . i Boa , 1111111111 O ��wa. �' ce E� ',.i wann1111. 1 ■ `' aE o \ u \ 1 111 3 -- 6 F O� � 111 10 �..� �■11 ; oipEy ■wake , a4. 1\t� ',IBM * A 1 - — 'L `F, :.1!111 0 �� 7 Uo ,',0-.\ O A �i'>t>� ii ]1 �m 7 /uaalp :,..,.... 111 .. ' lw _ y 1■11=188 I it1111111111 1 111"` �N i Eing Itmon IGIilF:1 : .n iIIIIII1 omma 111111nii111111 iNti11i : = '0 ..'7��111:�1E1~1: ° fl- � =1 ka 3.. 1111i1....�il ��•�i1B11«IIgIIII111;;I1i!I��, 1IF� a;�': - 1 AmIE>I,IMM"illl '��1 Hill lllr� IfIL:. .x•= tli14111. 1 1111.. iiii11111nii Izollllii � . iru �e�au.�iw u--uurwuauuu. �7r1�..�r..�f I'�= ,�:111�IR�q.�riiti��Yn��ll1��i�Lrllllll�.d.�:711113''—�`�1ii.N1 1• 1%ii_ illiMilliap .) 'L N J Z I- kl RV= T E •:,Ot ems,AO� Y � ! 1�CYlaisa� . 3 W 0 I I �m)111 �g�., . awl �� >< ! m - API' Mc vac, ►'wm \\r .e��`Jejvl'1�r i Fj uu.1_,H - aFplb uaP3 sa�� l :lec '1'q as `IPPE. c040 .uo ,(al.x ipsl Iii, � u� r� J 0 , I SIM Ila9 IPr a GI.. .,,1 N ° '. EW Mop Eaw CIS ... . -.IA or a '..1111114 7s pul ° • � � '� O CL Iva•weer J m... ` MK . C.. 7 I a 711111: Val &MEE A : 'I, 4.1, 4 ; prilAle ' C. 'Jl I "S! PM vmpoleil _ , ,,, iY ■ � a i !Ill" y .aul-{a' l � - ' a!i4lV !fii !1 IIOSI E O 1% li a i ��:'f �1f Al -x_7 1 .� iE `iAlliptiL‘t iler a a 111 ilir ..._ .4111V11111 (141P4r Eib,_-' it ;.)--o pli.r . l�llii L,._rmIlii118 uni.., rill . ®_A,r , )Jr, e �111lillllllliil ��2 a E 1 r a A �rrr l 111 INN1■111110�71 IOLLI t on". North � 1 mom\ ,m .i�■ i o,` "i ■ . ar,•minr■WII ^►-v(. ` a al Atm 117 le■ni 11 .■1 hi_ 0 . .�i1 'NI IC: 1NIIki■N I 11i- — a a A; .Ill:r a■ i misiii7mIA' a „, ,Iu 1111iii''1I ! = RiiiMilfielliir IC 11111r k,il 6 MI . Ili viii.. k .imm. ,., . _ w u A a d {�C�YIYi� - 3 0 .-E o O O 1 1 1 'o t ±O AR' Mc 17-4►a + fill lir iiim ) _a\\1� Q,e t�' uua_H x•3A. ReY 4 ■1 say EUaa� - uap3 sa E. :l es` I 'IPP ' Ilk IL �i]c040 :uO1 ,(al.x ipsl V a alga. 1...... `l I Epp r. o >,... o. 1. EW Mopeaw N a , lili £" Ilrest,. A� wait NI, 117. tiz1ir" o ,0. ► .11l�l�q 11� - : 1 ��. �. , 71_ IL■.. „, I1 bed _ O EMIL ,,� _z1Js ,^ ilviaa■p E 11.r.11[ 1 /� g ti &RI , tile k, 1 � � � � � � 11,..--,.yr.� LI�nI� IIOSIpE d O 1. - " 0 ! * P 1111., Jr,ilII,��'«�1 „, 1‘ ° i► ! ■� 1�� ,�11�E. - •N gt. .A ID — ,, 0 . ``� - Illl1'l�rf�il llr G a O r ° 1 VI 11111MP Hr ' mail )1-�'■ 11.0- -a■■" 8 <' 0 .:___Aili ■ 1 . ii,, " .444114Mtillir" CD North � 1 � ��■f o.` u 27 4,.., � S.`Ai, legit t 11--i.l• CI twl t11'='; CIF' N i mm\11111■ a NJ N Cs ,..... _ kV Al ii 1!RiLI Fail 3ed anal ZL'LJ , 1E..1MENIM E ',� \ ko �yin O 4ewa ° lxj uEli . G�� ` 111 ° t �0 azpod �� 7 co m uaa35e t lil- 0 F HE ld ,,,,'es' T 1 �~ oipEy ■ •aY 11 E'ZZ■i 0 0 t_N 1 -'5 " ` a ., 1� .\11111 1 -� - y .1 - 1i.N a-&,�1�, �r _ trews • r �!� /,aaa.p � 111 � ,l �'�' " elifilii-_,---- ' .... .— C 111 ' 0 , 16,...,._ ,—.010,„:Ti minima 8 I 0 Pfu igini 111 1 - ,.,'+IIIPI�iIii..'•: ililili111€Illil AA1'lll� 1p,./Mg ,, mi. - .J0 AraRap- M ■Fignosto mmn IIIIIrii : ■1 irk !3811111111 1a.■Em■ tillllinniII iumiNeinii. ,. _mai��u�l[ri'i��lillli fl- �� I� uullll 1�+ 3■.�, �+EIt41111dii.■..iri i��•�iiBli«Ilgillillll�i~Id1� �,�� 11F�� a. ,ra:al I meillil1 1�16�IC,IIIIir� \ ►:Ti : _ ! m—1 IIIIIQ�dllllrtliilYl€mamii `il1i111111N1i1i111111111111r 1M Jaou_�.uwwu�_uur� �uuu� 7r.■■�r■■w31'�=.—IILI Rq■Eniti�MIYN11lll1�i�Lrllllll�.d�:��°—�+''.., 9, .. uo1y5'p' w rd � .y . : Ann —1 z •:41k10 wag tlaq.U J /y■ aE NM 3 b.0 t.A° \. ; r R . 6YI`is Tai �< i• _ o s O OOU I I 0 tiAll' Me 6-7„ 1 _tip-,ra ..III .' _ aLL ReY x aq Q'�`�e< 1�r saa EUaaa I �, I / uuA.l.{ ci 1, uaoW' w !. a8p!b uap3 sa�, �, :lei �w c� •uo eIPPuE 1 1 .Aal al Lpsi. .: � u� Ag mil 1 211112 Ila9 moan ,,j a L as o, 7L ° 1. eW Mopeaw,IS m CA � "«...Ma / IN WO5 1I'` " qv- • 1..1.•-ion er J c�... A.riutio,.,fT rin • i c- 0 griitipq -,.. nomaposuatahmiii_w ,55,, : '1, 4, o vismil � rural m - r iiipahE a7 � + / L U „m - ti U °il 1 y c drz • e *.a _MI's A _ no.,! Lz�S ew EMIG �s a 111111 ' �- ` -- • d p o � lll cT° ' Nwt ♦ rl Aua c eeo aapaan .� 11.2.1. Z, o k:. , %\ I e ° 0J 11 I!Adb'N uos!PE 2 W y B■.Y �r _ ��i■N i it - . a !� � u• �, 1 ■1 �Ilill�.��! �aNd a !11111�� NI � �C� ` _ a � ° a NM� �� 111 111111 i,�' -�,��_ � "�4' �E E 1 _ i . . ii..�t wi ■111110 IMMF a „ L_,,_. ya) _ r za PI �� asunum 1..r� ”` -'LISG��■I�North ` =SU m∎�i11. - °,` M ill,� 4� C ��_ aranlnNMI;�I ou'9Aaie4aS � ' 1 MEMEM .411re; W VIII u° i1i 117 1163�E-ai 0 k .. 11111 "i in 1 r r a N �� Illl:m Ili '-- l tea.. �ir7��'�11m■ ',a ....a kV ,, �"� D X11111\ t 1l. , Elm. 5 r.y I •IVL�EI�. r G,w 4.a9 ,1-. G■; a ion -I dui ,.. U� "�' ��\ ,Aed IIIIIIIIIIII °�� i 1.1.1;] E �: 4ew Ira' �L� �� IIIIIIIIIII C ax, 1'a 't PF ' J1 tell i: �, ■uaa35e 0 1111Z 0 ��'I' 1 r ! " la s* 1\ .\III1l `!l " y — ` 'L k ..1•111 7 UO s,,,, 0 I aae'�11�1�,� 3 _ kg_ uE4e �W c a III, F N�` 11r� ny� /uaa ip 111 on p. ;' Ihy ° 1,1 G a+� ,^ L i _ Ill 11■1" �Ya l� '' L "1 111.�it ~/_�3 — ali ,,,.,am ` •u—H r1 1711.0. 11 �h,. n fir, N t op), yailil�7s I raum111111 I. II!4IIIii u;i;;'.: IIII111111€Illil 111111<I N �,111119 Ii■E i 111II11I11111I11111 1A - g L. " ��Ii�JG'��N 0 IIIIlG11IF:1 `'� ! I " 1: � � ��Alll�li . ('{^Z� �o r c 11 � �J�J.ic a v s° ♦�7 � ��u �[�i:i�lallll°1 fl- t 11�11,:JI1" in,3.. , E t4 ire iii....... .•i1Bli«Il.11llllll li!I I I 0��: .1149"iit1111N1511111V 'ICI Illilliilllr�n k �l' ..IIIIIQ�d11IliilillYl€Il k111 lillliIIIIIiiiiii i lllllllIII V: �e�Jaioue.au.�iul∎u∎mu En∎LII uuuw T.1•..∎r■■�f=.=—'=111.>R�q•■nits■■ anniiiInViiilli f la 1i1■M ok . : .,SEIM ro ` v ......m. w J , oo.a.ua�0 J 'i'O f111.xu:�:1I � I_ 1rL%t 3 N a p0 c w a� _ O .- N M J Z _ -om,,, , ., 0/ - iV6 A AV s d iii-„ - _.- ,-„, , tot.scl-sulrimit , litA i± u a_1 Midi- ,, i111 1, 11VMM � I O ■_ �'i Sca �eReY aA e��„Jes d r'' saJ EUaaA \ B uu.i.H uaP3 .� sa E' ,� I IaS audit .0 IF I ■ .I Ila 1E 1!.ME up M a , "R � - 3U O , e.iimil A` j $IJiA4tn Mop a . l 4 , O ©: . T�1tY—ieZ� F ° T to els'-'� c 4'A c.._ ? '1 : 18 • A o of-nome a 1111°.11 91 -Ed '�,� I .awEl„I t'.._ I,m 4'' gilo ar,` .;LZ i1S �o\�e d (n■ .tj EMI 11-- �t 1113 11Wi.�� iii. 1..illa , 0 1VIriI ¢fee V.i:Nietfi El <, a . .. . I, S't'l d7r All iiiiii illilitalluldief4,1 ' ,,, -gr' %- ‘iIN � ® I M 1111,`Z�g�11111�'�17 :��r, s 1 '' o IIIE� 1111111 5ro. r A o 4 1111`IIIIIingi1'.,y ■li 11T. � f a �71saaNU, I■IIIII0i71 IIII ire ,Y L;In • ..AK-111,' a �1, = �a ° , .w ■■ �r �1�' el ° .iii ,^5 ■illM PI - mammy a,, c No - Vi NI elm .HEAVE �.°'w1,.1 �r - m © ■EMS -,y1■=■ Li 0 �` 4 a ade ~' 111,1 7�L_ =K_t' 1W17.. ,, 11�1[STI�1�i1i?�7■�■■I iii_ O ,..3i..�+ kh ey, =� F 'IF:i�fii[aF7■� o. , J [ I .11 ��1 ■■■u■ a attiltia IME IIIPia1\ ■J 'IPL ' ■' Bll a 1111b Ile W�� ll � ,�- ro i I- E E ■ AaEd © liiilf Yilll oe N ■■ II>> +° 111101111"'1l 0 wa% uEwaaiyl c.n\c agezy3 FI.11�y -'.■1� lli +.• m „pod " uzw.ralyj ro ■�� II t '11� ,a 6 F ' 11110 ■ m %.,.., N Ell wase3 ` 1 y� 0 1pl mill i ' +�.. yP4 0 ci, - ' JD 1.0 CD i11 ? '�1ti1 11110 1� y .? 0 �IYa t•uF{ ya■11�' P C 'Pi�+�u�i1�111 �, dA■ f!'AI111111 11;111 IIIIII 1 o■■IA�I[,��i?� p, III IG��RI ■� ��' _ li's f iFalltll�I��ill�i�.'.. '�' �I I111 11110 �� ■ c 1111 1 ... r.....�G �g 116. ONSIM EMCIECIII it i ; 111, ` 111 If liilica�rr i11'iklEiF 911t1IE w11,E;1 • ��a11��ragm lin...„idl___ ', llir anvil r-m :Olmi1"110i1141Iliiiiiiillll llil ii11111111111�IICaI111IL SI 1 ��= CO N O■ O■ O ■ p0 N '-' `r' (.,., N v') v) `'� ■0 N ,� M N O _ N O N O 00 O M N '-' M N '-' ,� M l ,-I N M N '' N O in N H N N ,--i ,-I ,--I ,-I ,-I v') OA N ,.p M co N • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O N O N- N O I. N. CO CO O N N O N 0 0 LO CO (0 D O O CO L) - O L) pp • CO CO CO Lf) (o (o N N- I N. N (0 N CO ..- N N- CO Il CO CO Cr M N CA O CO pp Lf) p0 co N. Lf) co co O) O 0 0 0 N. co O co O O N O O N N N- N N ,-y O %- (O �--I ,--I c/D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 4-i O O _--1 _--I Q) (O N M N N p0 p0 M N— c.1 .1- ..— .— LO N (0 I. � N 0) CD CO CD (O CO N N- 00 LO M O Lf') CO (O 0) N L) N - - I. M N- N N- 00 7p V L) M N- Or p M ,--I 0 O 0 0 0 0 — co O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O (1) ■.O O O ■.O ri- i -L N N N O O O O O O CO O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O CO W r N N M VZ1 N LO O N O CO O 00 N N O O O O L) O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O (0 c in M O O N I� Lo O N N 0 0 0 0 CO O O O O O O O O N O O CO I,- co 0 ,a-1 N Oo M CW cN as 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 O w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 — 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 — 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N- Q w -- _ o M z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q - w --i o o N M QS N N O 0 0 0 N- 0) - - O O N O 0) O O N O 0 0 0 0 0 O QS in 0 r Q .--i N in N U) N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E C.-) O -, O N -L V (O N- N N- N CO 0) O CO N- N O O O 0) CD CD CD CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N c N O 0 A w ,,,,) w w U ( WU w x x � � w a w v� Oww w zU w0 z p4 aw ° � HH � Qc PEl 0w � H PO � 3H R.1 �x �xgzox w � xPc � QZ c � a � QQ E. a4 Z < 53' HHH p O P4 U WW WW O O > O w O it 0Q x w ‹ w H 0 0 0 0 ca w Z a rx cn H » 4 4 a rx = d U U v) Cn Cn CO Cl) CO 00 Lf) - CO Lf) Lf) (O N CO (O (O Cr) CO Lf) CD O) O) (O J ,- N N CO 00 Lf) N. N Lf) 00 N N. CO 00 O Q O CO (O N. N ,- (O CO I. Lf) O N N H 00 M LS .— .— OD O N H • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co Co 0 O O O O a 00 N. 00 O CN CO O Cr) O N O Cr) CO 00 I� co co co .— CO N O Lf) CO Co I. O N. > CO CO 0) N N N N (O N- U) N N O N O O O O O Cr) O N O O O O • Lf) 0) 0) 00 (O CD N d M _ U) V a N 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O c N O N. ,- 0 0 0 0 I. O N 00 O 00 LO ,- N i- 0 Lf) CO CO 00 00 I. N. N (O 0) (O (O o O O O Cr) N N U) M N- o) 00 Lf) O O O O co O co O O — 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (O cn LL Ce (3) (3) O O N O O O N O .- N 0 0 0 N LO - (O O 00 N N- (O W Q i U M - O 00 O - - Lf) 0 0 0 - - 0 CO ,- N O N U 0 - '- ..- M O = as > O Lf) O 00 - O Lf) O N O O (O 0 0 0 0 0 0 N C CO J N CC 0 J M ~ a = 0) - 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Z NL L I Q .- (O O - CO O Lf) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U LL Z o co Lf) N O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co 0 I. O CO O C LL CO O M O M I� CO LO I� N 0 0 0 0 LO O LO N a Cr) Cr) 00 N- N- N- N- (i) 0 N C Lf) I� O N — O co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CV 0 - O _ M ,- Lc U ,— C O O O N N O O O M O O O O O O Cr) ._ _ >, < C O z z U) 0 U U H zQ U) >- o oQ Q w 5W H H Q W Q � WZ W 0 ? H 0 0 H > Q Ct U O J Et W Z u) aUZC� Q Q U) p — OO < W J U) WwOZ ZHJU) U) QU) I— I— W UDQD ,- H U WQWUUQQU) ZZ0 QH0WZW W - HULLLLaO2W W QDUJmJ W 2 0z0LLLLe,LLQ - 00 U) QUQQQ 0 ,� ? DQQ w < 00D Qw2 _ OQ W w WQQQU) JJUUQ » � � � W � 2Q . 2 b Q WaHHHQQQQ000a0_ W > rn U) J Q 0 U) 0 Q 0 Spokane -£ .....Va lley PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT January 2013 AGREEMENTS FOR SERVICES ADOPTED AND IN OPERATION Contract Total %of Budget Contract Name Contractor Amount Expended as Expended of 1/31/13 Street Maintenance Poe Asphalt $1,366,663.00 $0.00 0.00% Street Sweeping AAA Sweeping $490,199.94 $0.00 0.00% Storm Drain Cleaning AAA Sweeping $189,990.00 $0.00 0.00% Snow Removal Poe Asphalt $140,000.00 $19,372.89 13.83% Landscaping Ace Landscaping $82,902,72 $0.00 0.00% Emergency Traffic Control Senske $10,000.00 $712.27 7.12% Litter and Weed Control Geiger Work Crew $838.51 State Highway Maintenance WSDOT $215,000.00 0.00% Traffic Signals,Signs,Striping Spokane County $632,000.00 0.00% Dead Animal Control Brad Southard $3,455.00 Citizen Requests for Public Works tn 140 - --—— 120 — - 0 100 - al 80 I -- — 60 N 40 {I I P 20 9 t _ eI{ r U I_� - C i 0 Total Citizen Snow Dead Roadway Pothole Sign& Traffic Requests: Removal Animal Hazard Requests Signal Graffiti Requests Public Removal Requests Works ISubmitted 126 53 31 2 4 25 1 10 ■In Progress 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l Resolved 126 53 31 2 4 25 1 10 *Information in bold indicates updates 1 January 2013 Snow and Ice Operations Date Man Hours Mag(Gallons} Iceslicer(Tons) Snowfall Pre-Treat Deicing Plowing Comments 01/01/13 0.00 Trace 01/02/13 23.00 5.00 Trace 01/03/13 8.00 500 X 01/04/13 8.00 01/05/13 17.50 5350 0.3 X X 01/06/13 58.00 26.50 2.0 X Limited Plowing 01/07/13 148.00 900 105.00 6.9 X X Plowing/Graders Hills 01/08/13 35.00 2050 45.00 0.1 X X Plowing/Graders Hills 01/09/13 25.00 1800 X 01/10/13 73.00 2100 1.5 X X Limited Plowing 01/11/13 56.00 450 0.2 X X Plowing 01/12/13 0.00 Trace 01/13/13 26,50 24.00 0.2 X Limited Plowing 01/14/13 74.00 _ 55.00 0.6 X Limited Plowing 01/15/13 40.00 3000 12.00 X X X Limited Plowing 01/16/13 24.00 4700 1.00 Trace X X 01/17/13 27.50 2975 Trace X X Lmtd Plow/Ice Removal 01/18/13 10.00 2500 X 01/19/13 0.00 01/20/13 0,00 Trace 01/21/13 8.00 Trace 01/22/13 14.50 150 X 01/23/13 50.00 2300 13.00 0.5 X X X Limited Plowing/Hills 01/24/13 47.00 7900 10.00 Trace X X X Limited Plowing/Hills 01/25/13 25.50 2000 5.00 Trace X X Lmtd Plow/Ice Removal I 01/26/13 23.50 5100 Trace X X 01/27/13 41.50 5250 10,00 0.2 X X 01/28/13 59.00 4000 27.00 0.7 X X X Limited Plowing 01/29/13 38,00 3900 30.00 1.0 X X Plowing 01/30/13 28.00 2200 1.50 Trace X X X Plowing _ 01/31/13 36.00 1200 X Totals 1024.50 60,325 370.00 14.20 Season Totals 1824.75 115,725 607.50 38.20 8.0 Precipitation Totals 7.0 _. 6.0 - 5.0 - - L3 Snowfall 4,0 - 11 Precipitation 3.0 - 2.0 1.0 Li0.0 I 1 I r1 I I'1�1 1 r1 111-T�7-1-1 -,- , ■ -r-1 -r l r ,.I 1 1 '-i- 1 1 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 13 21 23 25 27 29 31 mow 'Information in hold indicates updates 2 Temperature Graph 50 45 40 35 - i r 30 - WAve High 25 - Iry Avg Low 20 15 —+,—Actual Hi 10 x —+—Actual Low 5 o b I 1 1 1 ( 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 WASTEWATER Status of the process can be monitored at: http://www.spokaneriver.net/ http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/tmdl/spokaneriverfdissolved oxygen/status.html http://www.spokanecounty.orq/utilitiesNVaterReclamation/content.aspx?c=2224 and http://www.spokaneriverpartners.com/ REGIONAL SOLID WASTE SYSTEM Staff attended regional strategy meetings with Spokane County and City of Spokane regarding development of an RFP to solicit proposals from consultants to evaluate alternatives for solid waste management and disposal. The RFP is proposed to be advertised during the first part of February. PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN A contract has been executed with INIS to prepare the 2013 update to the Pavement Management Plan, Street evaluations are currently scheduled to begin in April. CAPITAL PROJECTS (See attached Capital Projects Spreadsheet) STREET MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY The following is a summary of Public Works/Contractor maintenance activities in the City of Spokane Valley for January 2013: • Snow and Ice Operations • Pothole patching and gravel shoulder repair • The Geiger crew continued with garbage pickup on arterials and miscellaneous projects in rights of way throughout the city. STORMWATER UTILITY Stormwater Capital Improvement Project Development 1. Stormwater Decant Facility — An agreement was executed with KPFF Consulting Engineers to perform a type, size, and location study by the end of the year for the WSDOT site. Preferred alternative was agreed upon between WSDOT and City staff. The consultant is finishing the study report. Staff continues working with WSDOT representatives to complete a Draft Interlocal Agreement for the 'Information in bold indicates updates 3 design, construction, and long-term operations and maintenance of the decant facility proposed for the WSDOT Pines Road location. 2. 2012 Stormwater Small Works projects - Repair, replace or improve problems on the stormwater list. First project package to go out to bid in January 2013 includes Pines/Alki, and Dishman-Mica near Appleway projects. First project package will be for construction in spring 2013. TRAFFIC • Sullivan Corridor Timing Staff has begun working with WSDOT in a joint effort to update signal timing on the corridor. a 1-90 Business Route Signs The City's request for a business route has been forwarded to WSDOT Headquarters. They are waiting for the AASHTO spring meeting announcement to be issued, which will include a solicitation for any changes to route numbering. a Freight and Goods Transportation System Map Staff is using annual traffic counts to estimate the tonnage of freight moved on all arterials in the City. This will be sent to WSDOT for the 2013 update of the state's Freight and Goods Transportation System Map. o Transportation LOS Update for Comprehensive Plan Staff has been collecting new intersection counts throughout the year and is working on updating the intersection LOS table for the Comprehensive Plan. We just received a draft copy of the 2040 Traffic Forecast Model from SRTC and are working on the 2018 and 2040 intersection forecasts and analysis. GRANT APPLICATIONS New Call for Projects o 2013 Quick Response Safety Program The City turned in two applications at the beginning of January. The Appleway Trail project did not receive funding. The City was awarded $200,000 to replace old regulatory and warning signs. o SRTC Call for Projects m CMAQ and TA Funds Staff is beginning to look at potential projects to recommend to Council for the upcoming Call for Projects in March this year. 'Information in bold indicates updates 4 Spp nne Public Works Projects Valley- Monthly Summary-Design &Construction January-2013 Estimated Total Project Proposed %Complete Construction Project # Design&Construction Projects Funding Bid Date PE I CN Completion — Cost Street Projects 0005 Pines/Manfield,Wilbur Rd to Pines TIB-UCP 05/23/08 100 95 04/30/13 $ 6,571,181 0146 24th Ave Sidewalk Adams to Sullivan TIB-SP 09/14/12 100 0 05/31/13 $ 292,000 0155 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement#4508 FHWA-BR 12/01/13 55 0 12/31/15 $ 1,000,000 0156 Mansfield Ave Connection FHWA-CMAQ 06/30/13 30 0 12/31/13 $ 1,976,800 0166 Pines Rd.(SR27)8L Grace Ave.Int Safety HSIP 04/01/14 0 0 10/31/14 $ 671,050 0175 Sullivan UP Tracks UC(SB)Resurfacing P FHWA-BR 06/14/13 0 0 09/30/13 $ 286,142 Street Preservation Projects 0174 2013 Street Preservation Project COSV TBD 24 0 12/15/13 $ 50,000 Traffic Projects 0060 Argonne Road Corridor Upgrade(SRTC 06-3 FHWA-CMAQ 03/15/13 95 0 08/31/13 $ 1,290,636 0061 Pines(SR27)ITS Improvements(SRTC 06-2 FHWA-CMAQ 09/21/12 100 0 07/15/13 $ 1,833,121 0133 Sprague/Sullivan ITS FHWA-CMAQ 09/14/12 100 10 05/31/13 $ 768,121 0167 Citywide Safety Improvements HSIP HSIP 0 0 06/30/15 $ 474,580 1 Stormwater Projects 0150 Sullivan Rd Bridge Drain Retrofit Dept of Ecology 05/03/13 95 0 07/01/13 $ 237,375 0163 Sprague Ave.Swale Upgrade,Park to 1-90 Dept of Ecology 08/03/12 100 70 06/30/13 $ 1,006,622 0173 Spokane Valley Regional Decant Facility Dept of Ecology TBD 0 0 12/31/13 $ - Other Projects 0149 Sidewalk lnfill FHWA-CMAQ 08/10/12 60 40 12/30/13 $ 939,955 0168 Wellesley Ave s'walk&Adams Rd s'walk SafeRcutes-State 04/12/13 55 0 11/30/13 $ 639,000 0169 Argonne/Mullan Safety-Indiana to Broadway HSIP TBD 0 0 06/30/15 $ 111,750 0170 Argonne Road:Empire Ave-Knox Ave HSIP TBD 0 0 06/30/15 $ 180,640 0171 Sprague Ave ADA Curb Ramp Project CDBG 02/08/13 100 0 09/01/13 $ 129,300 Design Only Design Estimated Total Project Complete %Complete Construction Project # Design Only Projects Funding Date PE Completion Cost Street Projects 0123 Mission Ave-Flora to Barker FHWA-STP(U) 09/30/13 5 TBD $ 517,919 1 0141 Sullivan&Euclid PCC FHWA-STP(U) 11/15/13 20 TBD $ 175,260 0142 Broadway @Argonne/Mullan FHWA-STP(U) 10/31/13 10 TBD $ 276,301 Traffic Projects 0159 University Road Overpass Study FHWA-CMAQ 12/01/13 4 TBD $ 249,711 0177 Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study FHWA-STP(U) 03/01/14 0 TBD $ 200,000 Other Projects 0145 Spokane Valley-Millwood Trail FHWA-STP(E) 02/15/13 0 TBD $ 745,000 0176 Appleway Trail COSV 12/01/13 0 TBD $ 150,000 1 1 I Spokane Valley Planning Commission Special Meeting Council Chambers — City Hall, 11707 E. Sprague Ave. January 7, 2013 I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Bates called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance III. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS Present Absent CITY STAFF Bill Bates -Chair John Hohman, Community Development Director Kevin Anderson r - Cary Driskell, City Attorney Christina Carlsen Erik Lamb,Deputy City Attorney Rod Higgins r Scott Kuhta, Planning Manager Steven Neill Lori Barlow, Senior Planner Robert McCaslin r r Mary Swank, Office Assistant Deanna Griffith,Administrative Assistant Joe Stoy—Vice Chair Cari Hinshaw, secretary IV. PLANNING COMMISSION TRAINING Commissioner Chair Bates called the special meeting to order at approximately 4:00 p.m. Mr. Bates explained how the training meeting would proceed and stated the purpose was to go over the Planning Commissions Policies and Procedures. Commissioner Bates welcomed the new Planning Commissioners: Kevin Anderson, Christina Carlsen, and Robert McCaslin, as well as thanked staff for all their hard work. Planning Manager John Hohman opened the training by introducing the City employees to the new Planning Commissioners. Staff provided a broad overview on a number of topics in order as follows: John Hohman: City Organizational Structure Cary Driskell: Planning Commission Authority/Duties and Conflict of Interest Cary Driskell: Open Public Meetings Act/Appearance of Fairness Planning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 2 Commissioner Chair Bates: Planning Commission Meeting Procedures Cary Driskell: Roberts Rules of Order Erik Lamb: Public Records and Email Usage Planning Manager Scott Kuhta: Zoning and Comp Plan Review Planning Manager Scott Kuhta: City Website Navigation. Staff and PC Commission agreed to move the website navigation training to the next Planning Commission Meeting this Thursday January 10, 2013. Senior Planner Lori Barlow: Shoreline Management Act Overview In closing Commissioner Bates complimented and told the staff how much he appreciates everything they do. V. GOOD OF THE ORDER There was nothing for the good of the order. VI. ADJOURNMENT The being no other business the meeting was adjourned at 6:10 p.m. Bill Bates, Chairperson Cari Hinshaw, PC Secretary Date signed / /a2'v/%:3 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 2 Spokane Valley Planning Commission APPROVED Minutes Council Chambers— City Hall, 11707 E. Sprague Ave. January 10, 2013 I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Bates called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. III. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS Present Absent CITY STAFF Bill Bates-Chair x John Hohman,Community Development Director Joy Stoy—Vice-chair x r Cary Driskell-Attorney Robert McCaslin x r Lori Barlow—Senior Planner Rod Higgins x r Steven Neill x r Christina Carlsen x r Kevin Anderson x y Mary Swank, secretary Chair Bates introduced and welcomed the new commissioners, Christina Carlsen,Robert McCaslin and Kevin Anderson. Chair Bates stated the rules and procedures for the election of officers 2013. Chair Bates opened for planning commission chair. Commissioner Stoy nominated Commissioner Bates for Chair. Nominations were closed. Vote was unanimous. Chair Bates opened for planning commission vice-chair. Commissioner Higgins nominated Commissioner Stoy for Vice-Chair. Nominations were closed. Vote was unanimous. Planning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 6 IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Commissioner Stoy made a motion to approve the agenda as presented. The motion was passed unanimously. V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Higgins made a motion to approve the 12-13-2012 minutes as presented. The motion was passed unanimously. VI. PUBLIC COMMENT There was no public comment. VII. COMMISSION REPORTS Commissioner McCaslin-no reports. Commissioner Carlsen—attended meeting on Monday for orientation. Commissioner Higgins—attended the bridge presentation last evening and orientation. Commissioner Stoy—attended orientation. Commissioner Neill—no reports Commissioner Anderson—attended orientation. Chair Bates—no reports. VIII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS Mr. Hohman welcomed the new Commissioners, and thanked them for attending the orientation. He stated that the Community Development Dept. is in the midst of staffing changes. City Council approved the 2013 Business Plan and that resulted in moving two planners from the Planning Division to the permit center. It additionally created two permit facilitator jobs that will replace the permit specialists with more knowledge to do over the counter plan reviews. He mentioned that City's marketing campaign and the article in the latest copy of the "Inlander." The article was favorable. We continue our efforts to build on momentum to be the best permit center and the best staff in the region. IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS A. New Business: Study session: Shoreline Master Program Senior Planner Lori Barlow provided an overview of the Draft Public Access Plan, the requirements of the Shoreline Management Act and the guidelines, and covered the content of the Draft Plan. She highlighted the public access definition, SMA and WAC regulations, and following points of the Plan: Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 6 • Public access offers the general public the opportunity to reach, touch and enjoy the water's edge,to travel and view the water from shoreline and adjacent locations. • SMA requirements in RCW 90.58.100(2) (b) (c) and the WAC requirements (173-26- 221-4)which explain how we are to meet the goals and policies of the SMA. • Section One — The Introduction identifies the purpose of the plan and the context for development which is that the city currently has adequate access due mostly to public land ownership and the Centennial Trail. • Section Two — Integration with other Community Plans, highlights the other relevant community plans that were considered in the development of this plan. • Section Three — Public Access and Public Uses, provides an inventory of the existing public access and uses, and describes ownership, river and trail access, and parking lot conditions and the typical locations of uses • Section Four—Shoreline Conditions, describes shoreline conditions by breaking the river corridor into 4 segments and discusses the character of land use and vegetation, access and use of the corridor, and the key use area. This section also introduces future use areas. • Section Five — Proposed Shoreline Access and User Improvements, describes proposed improvements to existing and future access and use areas • Section Six — Implementation Strategy identifies that access and improvements can be voluntary if proposed by a developer and consistent with the Public Access Plan, or required of a development if the development impairs an existing public access or creates a demand for public access that doesn't currently exist. Improvements are designated on publicly owned lands, and assumed to be provided for within the capital improvement budgets of the state and/or local agencies. It was noted that the access being discussed as part of the Sullivan Bridge replacement project is identified in the plan as a proposed improvement. Commissioner Stoy asked whether or not the City met the SMA requirement for public access. Ms. Barlow responded that — we are taking advantage of the alternative approach, which is to develop a public access plan which looks at public access along our whole corridor rather than at a project by project basis. We believe this plan meets that requirement. Commissioner McCaslin asked about the acquisition of property for parking. Ms. Barlow noted that the plan identifies a deficiency in parking at The North Barker Road access site and recommends that additional parking be contemplated. Because these improvements would be on public property, funding would be part of the state or city budgeting process. This plan does not bind the city to acquire land. Mr. Hohman said the Public Works Dept frequently purchases properties for right of way projects. I would assume if there was parking to be acquired it would be done by the Public Works Department. We handle it with a consultant who handles appraisal and negotiations on fair market value. If there is an opportunity for us to buy, it is presented to the property owner; we are prohibited from paying anything less than fair market value. Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 6 Discussion followed regarding the type of boat ramp proposed at Sullivan Park. John Patrouch, URS Corp noted that the bank at Sullivan Park is very steep, and that the access would be for kayaks and canoes etc... Chair Bates asked if parking lot paving would trigger ADA requirements. Mr. Patrouch responded that part of the parking areas are supposed to be ADA compliant. However, the one at Barker Road south looks too steep to be ADA compliant. I don't think it is a state requirement for river access improvements, unless you get state or federal money. The Shoreline Advisory Group expressed an interest in being able to put disabled vets .in the boats. If it can be implemented, it is desired by the community. Ms. Barlow mentioned that on Wed. Jan 16, an open house was scheduled. The public hearing will follow on January 24, and Tadas Kisielius will be present for questions. At that time the Planning Commission will be asked to make a recommendation to Council. Other items discussed included a clarification as to whether future trails would be required to be paved. Ms. Barlow noted that a trail can be as informal as a foot path, and that nothing in the Plan requires trails to be paved. Mr. Patrouch noted that motor boats are launched at a boat ramp at State Line and at the airport; during the spring, Millwood and Orchard Avenue area boats are put in at Felts Field once a year and taken out once a year. The City does not have any formal boat ramps. Commissioner Anderson asked if the shoreline management rules would apply to State Parks if they want to do something to the shoreline. Ms. Barlow explained that anytime there is any project or development proposed within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark, then it is within shoreline jurisdiction, and it is regulated by the Shoreline Master Program. It doesn't make a difference if the property is publicly owned or the project is publicly funded. It is still subject to the Shoreline Master Program rules. Commissioner Anderson asked if somebody wanted to access the trail would you have to get permission from State Parks to put a trail off of their trail onto the river for access. Ms. Barlow responded yes. Swimming access issues were discussed and Cary Driskell, City Attorney clarified that the city has water safety regulations that require floatation devices when entering the river. If the Planning Commission is interested I will look at that and get back to you. I don't think the city would put up signs for a swimming hole. Ms. Barlow noted that the Plan doesn't recommend a swimming area, but rather notes it as a typical use occurring along the river corridor. Commissioner Anderson asked if there is any way we can coordinate the use of the Harvard Road Access as part of this program when you know Myrtle Point someday will have a boat ramp. That way you would have ramps at both ends that could handle kayaks, raft, drift boats and you don't have a fight in the middle of never having it work. Mr. Patrouch responded that we are working with the Spokane River Forum and talking about Harvard Road as a river trail spot for drift boats, kayaks etc. The Spokane River Forum is working on funding to replace the old access at Myrtle Point. The best recreational run is from Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 6 Barker to Sullivan Rd. We need access at those areas. We will never be able to bring in big motor or drift boats. Commissioner Bates asked how much of the shorelines are city owned, state owned and private owned. Ms. Barlow responded that over 60 percent of the shoreline is publicly owned. It is predominately state owned. I will bring information back to you. Discussion on motor boats followed noting that they are prohibited in most of the reaches of the river. They are only allowed from the westerly city limits to Centennial Trail Bridge;regulations and speed limits apply. Mr. Driskell noted that the speed limits and wake zones eliminate motor boat use in most areas of the river. Ms. Barlow noted that the timeline for the public access plan would coordinate with the SMP, and it is a 20 year period. The Chair declared a ten minute break which began at 7:20pm Use Manufactured Home Discussion: Community Development Director John Hohman discussed issues related to manufactured home regulations. He-noted that on November 8, 2012 staff proposed a change to the zoning regulations that would allow used manufactured homes to be placed in manufactured home subdivisions. This discussion is intended to be a follow-up to determine if the Planning Commission believes that staff should approach City Council to discuss if used manufactured homes should be allowed city wide. The current regulations allow a manufactured home to be placed on any residential lot, but require the home to be new. This is applied across the board to individual lots and to manufactured home subdivisions. When we discussed manufactured homes on individual lots throughout the city, the Commission was deadlocked. The consensus was to wait until the new members came on board to have the discussion. We have had a few individuals over the last few years request the code be amended to allow used manufactured homes throughout the city. Chapter 5 of the Comprehensive Plan discusses affordable housing, inventories and other elements that help guide housing decisions, and Chapter 10 discusses protecting and preserving the character of neighborhoods. Affordable housing is an issue throughout the city. However, you also need to consider if this action would impact established neighborhoods. The City has not requirements relating to manufactured home condition. The home may be in good repair, or not. How would the surrounding residents feel about that? Manufacturing housing legislation was also discussed, and it was noted that the city code is in compliance with state law as it is currently written. Legislation allows cities to regulate the age of manufactured homes. Mr. Hohman clarified that a manufactured home in a subdivision would typically involve a privately owned lot. A manufactured home park would be a single underlying property owner and the properties leased to the person owning the manufactured home. We do have several subdivisions throughout the city that were anticipated to be manufactured home subdivisions. The Commissioners discussed potential impacts of placing an older used manufactured home in an established neighborhood, the difference between a mobile home, constructed prior to 1976, and a manufactured home constructed to a different standard subsequent to 1976, and the fact that the code does not regulate aesthetics or manufactured home condition. Commissioner Neill noted that he supported allowing used manufactured homes and establishing an age limit. Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 6 Commissioner McCaslin stated his concern about limiting the homes due to age and supported allowing homes newer than 1976. I support manufactured homes in communities to allow affordable housing. Commissioner Higgins indicated he did not think this was a major issue. The fear is someone putting an older home in a new development. That's not likely to happen since they have HOA's. Mr. Hohman stated that more than 90 percent of manufactured homes are never moved after placement.He suggested that the Code consider condition, rather than age. The Commission agreed unanimously that staff should discuss a code text amendment with City Council to allow used manufactured homes to be placed on all residential lots? Commissioner Anderson also noted that the 1976 date should be the baseline, but aesthetics should be considered Commissioner Stoy noted that lots that are going to be affordable are not going to be in major developments. I don't have a problem with that as long as it is newer that 1976. But upkeep is suggestive.Commissioner Higgins stated that the— 1976 date"Fits quite well." Chair Bates noted that the Comprehensive Plan mentions affordable housing.We have an obligation to look at these things. Mr. Hohman indicated that staff will move forward with the discussion. Password and email address discussion. Ms. Barlow explained how to access email for the Commissioners. If you need any assistance contact Greg Bingamen. X. GOOD OF THE ORDER There was nothing for the good of the order. XI. ADJOURNMENT There being no other business the meeting was adjourned at 8:03 p.m. Bill Bates, Chairperson Mary Swank,PC Secretary Date signed ( l2`'/i3 Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 6 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: Feb 19th, 2013 Department Director Approval: ❑ Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: School Zone Flashing Beacons GOVERNING LEGISLATION: n/a PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: n/a BACKGROUND: Council requested an update on the School Zone Flashing Beacon program. Since 2006 the City has received several grants to pay for school zone beacons. These funds come from the Washington Traffic Safety Commission. From 2006 through 2011 the funding was only available for elementary schools. In 2012 the program was expanded to cover middle schools. Within the City limits there are 27 elementary and middle schools. Fifteen (15) of these schools have beacons, and 12 do not. Currently at the 15 schools with beacons, the City maintains 32 individual beacons. The table below shows the funds the City has received over the years, along with the installation and maintenance costs. Installation costs include a survey of the school zone to determine right-of-way boundaries, preparing the foundation and then installation of the equipment. Equipment Purchase Installation Maintenance Year Grant City Notes City Funds City Funds Funds Funds 2006 $58,100 $957 $10,000 (est) Not tracked Included radar boards. 2007 $25,086 $518 $7,000 (est) Not tracked 2008 $3,500 $0 $4,606 $503 Added rear-facing beacons. 2009 $15,000 $4,000 $15,309 $2,884 2010 n/a n/a - $6,559 2011 $65,400 $7,170 $17,667 $5,430 Funding included upgrading the controllers to a new system. 2012 n/a n/a $9,978 $1,480 Beacons approved in fall 2011 were installed in 2012. Total $167,086 $12,645 $64,560 $16,856 The 2013 call for funding was released on February 11th. Applications are due May 3rd. Staff will bring a request to Council this spring to determine if additional beacons should be applied for. At that time we will discuss the locations with the school districts and law enforcement. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: None. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None. STAFF CONTACT: Inga Note, Senior Traffic Engineer ATTACHMENTS: None • S.4 j/ S P O Ic A t S�', Flu -- le O U N T:';5( OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER MICHAEL C.DEMPSEY,CH VINER s ` „1r„MEMORANDUM , To: City Manager(Mike Jackson), City Council members, and Director of City Community Development Department(John Hohman) From: Michael C. Dempsey, City Hearing Examiner Pro Tem >1/t, CO Re: Annual Report on City Hearing Examiner System Date: February 4,2013 The City Hearing Examiner is required to annually provide a report to you stating the number and type of hearings conducted and decisions issued during the past year, the outcome of such decisions, recommendations for improving the hearing examiner system, and pertinent observations and recommendations regarding land use policies and regulations. See Section 18.20.030.B.1 of Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). A. Interlocal agreement for hearing examiner services The Hearing Examiner hears and decides land use matters and dangerous dog appeals for the City on a pro tem basis, pursuant to an interlocal agreement executed between the City and Spokane County in 2006. The City has been contracting with the County for Bearing examiner services since the incorporation of the City in 2003. The interlocal agreement renews automatically at the end of each year, for a 1-year period, unless terminated by either entity with notice. The Hearing Examiner bills for services at an hourly rate, as determined under the interlocal agreement. The Hearing Examiner has been employed full-time as the Spokane County Hearing Examiner since 1996. • B. Matters heard or decided for Spokane Valley in 2012 In 2012, the Hearing Examiner heard and decided 4 land use matters for the City, and no dangerous dog/potentially dangerous dog appeals. There were no appeals of the Examiner's decision on the land use matters. THIRD FLOOR PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING 1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE,SPOKANE,WASHINGTON 99260-0245 PRONE: (509)477-7490 o PAX: (509) 477-7478 0 TDD; (509)477-7133 • Annual Report on City of Spokane Valley Hearing Examiner System February 4, 2013 Page 2 The following table indicates the disposition of land use matters heard during 2012: 2012 Spokane Valley Land Use Matters Decision Approved Denied Returned Appealed Plats 1 0 0 0 PUDs 1 0 0 0 Rezones 1 0 0 0 Change of conditions 0 0 0 0 Variances 0 0 0 0 Conditional Use Permits 1 0 0 0 Shoreline Permits 0 0 0 0 Administrative Appeals 0 0 0 0 Code Enforcement 0 0 0 0 Appeals The Hearing Examiner heard and decided approximately 45 Iand use, drug forfeiture and dangerous/potentially dangerous dog appeal matters for Spokane County in 2012. Some of the drug forfeiture cases processed by the Examiner involved the investigation of controlled substance violation by the Spokane Valley Police Department. The Hearing Examiner occasionally hears land use matters for the City of Spokane Hearing Examiner, in conflict situations;pursuant to an interlocal agreement. The Hearing Examiner also heard a Iand use matter for Pend Oreille County in 2012, pursuant to a memorandum of understanding with Spokane County. C. Observations and recommendations regarding City hearing examiner system; and land use olicies re ulatious and rocedures _ The public hearings conducted by the Hearing Examiner for the City are all conducted at City Hall, on Thursday mornings. The City's website, under the City Conununity Development Department, can be accessed to obtain copies of Hearing Examiner decisions and agendas for Spokane Valley matters. The Examiner believes that the hearing examiner system for the City of Spokane Valley is working well. The relative lack of appeals over the years is a sign that the recommendations by City staff, and the decisions by the Hearing Examiner, are sound with regard to land use matters and other matters heard by the Examiner. Annual Report on City of Spokane Valley Hearing Examiner System February 4, 2013 • Page 3 The Hearing Examiner keeps pace with City Council actions and changes to the SVMC through weekly review of City Council agendas, the hearing process, updates to the SVMC provided by the City Clerk, contacts with City staff, and the local newspapers. The Hearing Examiner has consistently been impressed with the staff reports and presentations submitted by City Community Development Department staff at public hearings held by the Examiner on land use matters. Staff has been receptive to requests made by the Hearing Examiner to ensure that staff reports address all the approval criteria the Examiner is required to consider in issuing a land use decision. Staff presentations are second to none in the use of power point and exhibits to provide and display information. From time to time, the Hearing Examiner has recommended changes to the SVMC where there are inconsistencies or ambiguities in the regulations, particularly those that affect the hearing process. D. Other matters The Hearing Examiner is an attorney, and is required to complete 15 hours of continuing legal education each year as an active member of the Washington State Bar Association. The Hearing Examiner is a longstanding member of the Washington State Hearing Examiners Association, and attended the association's annual conference in 2012. Prior to being appointed County Hearing Examiner in 1996, the Examiner served as a deputy prosecuting attorney for 16 years; specializing primarily in land use, public works and other civil matters; but also received extensive experience in all areas of criminal prosecution. This included 9 years serving as a Senior Attorney in the Civil Division of the Spokane County Prosecuting Attorney's Office. The Hearing Examiner has been a resident of the City of Spokane Valley since 1987, grew up in the Spokane Valley, and graduated from West Valley High School. The Examiner is a graduate of the University of Washington, and Gonzaga Law School; and has been an attorney since 1978. The Hearing Examiner is an active member of the community; including being a member and past president of Downtown Kiwanis, and involvement in church activities. The Examiner's Office employs a staff assistant, Kristine Chase; who acts as the clerk and recorder during land use hearings conducted for Spokane Valley and Spokane County, Annual Report on City of Spokane Valley Hearing Examiner System February 4, 2013 Page 4 handles budget, accounting and clerical functions; and processes, schedules, and provides noticing for drug forfeiture claims and/or forfeiture orders, Kristine is a former staff assistant for the Spokane County Building and Planning Department, and for Spokane County Veterans Services. She is married to Doug Chase, the Director of the County Parks, Recreation and Golf Department, E. Meeting with City Manager, City Council and Director of Community Development Department The Hearing Examiner welcomes the opportunity to meet with the City Manager, City Council members and the Director of Community Development regarding this report, upon request. The Examiner attends City Council meetings on occasion in order to monitor proposed changes to the City Development Code that may affect the Hearing Examiner, and to meet new members elected to the Council. • c: Cary DriskelI, City Attorney • • • • CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: February 19, 2013 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ® information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Response to citizen inquiry regarding purchasing police vehicles GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: N/A BACKGROUND: At the Council meeting on January 22, 2013, a citizen inquired about two matters related to the purchase of police vehicles used in our City. First, he wanted to know if Spokane Valley vendors were given an opportunity to submit bids to the Sheriffs Department for vehicles used in the City. Second, he asked if a Spokane Valley business could be used to apply police decals to cars used here. Although the intent of the state bidding laws is to try to get the lowest price so as to conserve our public money, we want to ensure that our local businesses are given an equal opportunity to participate in providing products. Staff asked the Sheriff's Department how such purchasing takes place, and specifically whether Spokane Valley businesses were given an opportunity to participate. We were informed that notice of the bid went out to local vendors, including in the City. Our local Ford dealer did respond, but did not have the lowest price. Chief VanLeuven informed me that recently the Sheriff's repair shop began applying the police decals to Sheriff vehicles, including those used in the City. Staff called the citizen to inform him of these findings. He said he was satisfied with these responses, and thanked staff for getting back to him. OPTIONS: N/A RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: N/A BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney ATTACHMENTS: