The URL can be used to link to this page

2013, 06-11 Regular MeetingAGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING FORMAL FORMAT MEETING Tuesday, June 11, 2013 6:00 p.m. Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers 11707 E Sprague Avenue Council Requests Please Silence Your Cell Phones During Council Meeting CALL TO ORDER: INVOCATION: Pastor Al Hulten, Valley Assembly Church PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: ROLL CALL: APPROVAL OF AGENDA: INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: June Community Recognition COMMITTEE, BOARD, LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS: MAYOR'S REPORT: PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those on this agenda as action items. (Action items include public hearings, and those items under NEW BUSINESS. Public Comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.) When you come to the podium, please state your name and address for the record and limit remarks to three minutes. 1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. a. ADDroval of the followina claim vouchers: VOUCHER LIST VOUCHER NUMBERS TOTAL AMOUNT 05/23/2013 29215 -29250 $288,176.67 05/24/2013 29251 -29288 $92,056.01 05/31/2013 29289 - 29325; 529130114; 530130040; 530130044 $2,409,885.04 05/31/2013 5568 -5580 $1,978.00 06/03/2013 5581 $502..00 06/03/2013 29326 -29344 $67,866.34 GRAND TOTAL $2,860,464.06 b. Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending May 31, 2013: $415,476.28 c. Approval of May 28, 2013 Council Meeting Minutes, Formal Format NEW BUSINESS: 2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 13 -007, Manufactured Homes in Individual Lots — Micki Harnois [public comment]. 3. First Reading Proposed Ordinance 13 -008, Comprehensive Plan —Mike Basinger [public comment] Council Agenda 06 -11 -13 Formal Format Meeting Page 1 of 2 4. First Reading Proposed Ordinance 13 -009, Zoning Map, Comprehensive Plan — Mike Basinger [public comment] 5. Proposed Resolution 13 -006 Adopting 2014 -2019 Transportation Improvement Plan — Steve Worley [public comment] 6. Motion Consideration: Approval of Contract, Phase I Decant Facility — Eric Guth [public comment] PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those on this agenda as action items. (Action items include public hearings, and those items under NEW BUSINESS. Public Comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.) When you come to the podium, please state your name and address for the record and limit remarks to three minutes. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: 7. Lodging Tax Report — Erik Lamb/Mark Calhoun 8. Pavement Preservation Phase Two — Eric Guth 9. Advance Agenda — Mayor Towey INFORMATION ONLY (will not be reported or discussed): 10. Finance Monthly Report 11. Police Department Monthly Report 12. Stormwater Project Grant Requests CITY MANAGER COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT General Meeting Schedule (meeting schedule is always subject to change) Regular Council meetings are generally held every Tuesday beginning at 6:00 p.m. The Formal meeting formats are generally held the 2nd and 41h Tuesdays. Formal meeting have time allocated for general public comments as well as comments after each action item. The Study Session formats (the less formal meeting) are generally held the 0_3 1d and 5th Tuesdays. Study Session formats DO NOT have time allocated for general public comments; but if action items are included, comments are permitted after those specific action items. NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical, hearing, or other impairments, please contact the City Clerk at (509) 921 -1000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made. Council Agenda 06 -11 -13 Formal Format Meeting Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 11, 2013 Department Director Approval: ❑X Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Following Vouchers: VOUCHER LIST VOUCHER NUMBERS TOTAL AMOUNT 05/23/2013 29215 -29250 $288,176.67 05/24/2013 29251 -29288 $92,056.01 05/31/2013 29289- 29325; 529130114; 530130040; 530130044 $2,409,885.04 05/31/2013 5568 -5580 $1,978.00 06/03/2013 5581 $502.00 06/03/2013 29326 -29344 $67,866.34 GRAND TOTAL $2,860,464.06 9001- General Fun 001-011.000.51 l 001.013.000.513. 001.013.015.515. 001.016.000. 001.018.013.513. 001.018.014.514. 001.018.016.518. 001.032.000. 001.058.050.558. 001.058.055.558. 001.058.056.558. 001.058.057.558. 001.076.000.576. 001.076.300.576. 001.076.301.571. 001.076.302,576. 001,076.304.575. 001-076.305.571. 001.090.000.511. 001.090.000.514. 001.090.000.517. 001.090.000.518. 001.090.000.519. 001.090.000.540. 001.090.000.550. 001.090.000.560. 001.090.000.594. 001.090.000.595. Explanation of Fund Numbers f I City Council City Manager Legal Public Safety Deputy City Manager Finance Human Resources Public Works Comm. Develop.- Administration Comin. Develop.— Develop.Eng. Community Develop.- Planning Community Develop.- Building Parks & Rec— Administration Parks & Rec - Maintenance Parks & Rec - Recreation Parks & Rec- Aquatics Parks & Rec - Senior Center Parks & Rec - CenterPlace General Gov't- Council related General Gov't - Finance related General Gov't - Employee supply General Gov't- Centralized Services General Gov't - Other Services General Gov't - Transportation General Gov't - Natural & Economic General Gov't - Social Services General Gov't - Capital Outlay General Gov't - Pavement Preservation aund on Voucher Lists Other Funds 101 — Street Fund 103 — Paths & Trails 105 — HotellMotal Tax 120 — CenterPlace Operating Reserve 121— Service Level Stabilization Reserve 122 — Winter Weather Reserve 123 — Civic Facilities Replacement 204 — Debt Service 301 — Capital Projects (I" %a% BEET) 302 -- Special Capital Proj (21" %% REET) 303 — Street Capital Projects 304 — Mirabeau Point Project 307 —Capital Grants 309 —Parks Capital Grants 310 — Civic Bldg Capital Projects 311 — Pavement Preservation 312 --- Capital Reserve 402 — Stormwater Management 403 —Aquifer Protection Area 501 — Equipment Rental & Replacement 502 — Risk Management RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Approve claims for vouchers as listed above. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun, Finance Director; ATTACHMENTS: Voucher Lists V- fil (9 L1 > W Q co r-I a R G7 M r O N N Cl) CV i 0 N N r r A 0 0 M 00 r 0) 0A (D W O O CO 0D ((� r � (D O 00 O M M N r- N N if) (O L� r O) N N N N O O 0) 1. 6) f` C~ N O (f) O (O t C GO CO O C 00 00 14 ti r N M O 4 1� 1� (D Cd 0 M W m 00 00 co M N O N 00 L!) In m 01 X 0 0 to CO (D (R N 1+ a M M 00 00 co M ' :F Lo LO `c, qt N N r T N T r (p (O 6 CA r r d CV (p N N CD w r r OJ W LaL I w a a J a O U d a O LL o z ¢ > w v W a Q a a D- 0 W u7 vi cii CL a w (] W J J _ J Q J Lr d d W O w (n CL ¢ LL V) (n N 0) 0) N C14 N L� � Li M O �M-- O O 0 (V M (V O CV (V a 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 LL r co 0 T r 0) � U 0 p 00 c r U z J a z O H U a U) z O U 0 Q � h O CO °o G Q) O � � M � O G) 13 O u �+ LO U N l� CA > N M LL z z M M M g U JS O a7 o W co co rl d U o 0 U z z g U JS LLI o W o p C L 0) _ F- > W L z ch �� OW 2Wi. U m w Z J U 0 W Q 2 W W U_ Q H d DO (n fnU fWA> Q IL 0 w Q m m U U otF m wz J (1) �JCyn z oz O ❑ r O ff ❑ m N (,) fA O of J w O m r Q M N w Q U) w w L N M r r O O H w > > z } N O O (~la [n 0_ Q Q M M Cl) (�1 N v rn tin ao w r- rn 0) LO (D td ((7 Ln Ln (f) U( U( LQ (C) ([) (n O Q 00 00 0 C) O O (�f) N (0 N N O r r 0 00 Cl) M O O 1t N M co v � 00 00 � O 0 dN 1- o M O o O M o o O a N Cy N N N 0 O 0 O M M M 0 O r t- O O O T T T LO to to O O O m � m �_ (� M Q Q M M O V O M M co O O (0D 000 _M LO o co co �� w � 2 0 00 U z z g U qa L� _ F- z co U z Z z Q z w r=- J U Q H H w w 0 z N Q IL 0 w Q m m U U otF m c000 0 o °O o a O o O O O O M M M M M M r r T r r r O O 0 O O O ❑ ❑ C M M C1r) M M Cl) (�1 N N N N N LC) L1) (f) L LO (D td 0) N rte- O N O Q M M [h N N N N r N N ar N [7) li5 0_ z g qa L� _ U z Q z r=- U Q H H LL Q IL W W otF m W w W > ❑ O w '� LO ❑ ❑ ❑ LO 00 0 O 00 O Q M M [h co T r r r O O O O N_ N 1t N M N N N N M LO N Cy N N N N N N ar N [7) li5 0_ vchlist 001.011.000.511 Voucher List 71959 Page: 2 05/2312013 4:01 :57PM Spokane Valley 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES. PW 163.05 Bank code : apbank SUPPLIES: PW 27.52 83889 101.000.000.542 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund /Dept Description/Account Amount 29225 5/23/2013 003256 003256 DISCOVERY BENEFITS, INC, HRA PI (Continued) RETURN SUPPLIES: PW Total : 1,102.50 29226 5/23/2013 000278 DRISKELL, CARY EXPENSE 001.013.015.515 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 560.95 -38.11 Total : Total : 560.95 29227 5/23/2013 002507 FASTENERS, INC 53562031.001 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 41.87 1,400.00 PAY APP 4 S3569230.001 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 20.46 Total : 53625523.001 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 132.06 4,331.98 S3626749.001 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 83.75 001.013.015.515 BUSINESS CARDS 102.44 Total : 278.14 29228 5/23/2013 000007 GRAINGER 9138560579 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 119.03 29229 5/23/2013 002568 GRANICUS INC 29230 5/23/2013 002520 HUSKY INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 29231 5/23/2013 000220 ICMA 29232 5/23/2013 000313 INLAND ASPHALT COMPANY INC 29233 5/23/2013 000864 JUB ENGINEERS, INC. 29234 5/23/2013 001944 LANCER LTD Total : 119.03 45521 001.011.000.511 BROADCASTING SERVICES 71959 Total : 719.59 81215 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES. PW 163.05 83815 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 27.52 83889 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 7.88 83906 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 274.28 CM75825 101.000.000.542 RETURN SUPPLIES: PW -29.41 CM81657 101.000.000.542 RETURN SUPPLIES: PW - 279.05 CM83877 101.000.000.542 RETURN SUPPLIES: PW -38.11 Total : 126.16 435270 001.013.000.513 MEMBERSHIP DUES: M. JACKSON 1,400.00 Total : 1,400.00 PAY APP 4 403.000.163.595 CONSTRUCTION - SPRAGUE SWAI 41,94529 Total : 41,945.29 0081547 101.042.000.542 TIP DATA MAINTENANCE AND SUP 4,331.98 Total : 4,331.98 0436669 001.013.015.515 BUSINESS CARDS 102.44 Tota 1 : 102.44 Page: 2 vchlist Voucher List Page: 3 05/23/2013 4:01:57PM Spokane Valley Bank code, apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund /Dept Description /Account Amount 29235 5/23/2013 000482 LANDTEK, LLC 4921 311.000.174.595 0174 - 2013 STREET PRES. PH1 SL 1,911.25 Total : 1,911.25 29236 5/23/2013 003251 MDI MARKETING 9643 001.090.000.558 APRIL 2013 ADVERTISEMENTS 464.01 Total: 464.01 29237 5/23/2013 002259 MENKE JACKSON BEYER EHILS 492 303.303.060.595 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,085.00 Total : 1,085.00 29238 5/23/2013 001536 NEW URBAN NEWS 2013 001.058.056.558 PLANNING SUBSCRIPTION; KUHTF 79.00 Total : 79.00 29239 5/23/2013 000239 NORTHWEST BUSINESS STAMP INC. 89850 001.018.016.518 SLOTTED NAME BADGE 28.26 Total: 28.26 29240 5/23/2013 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 654967801001 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES: PARKS AND REC 254.75 654967884001 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES: PARKS AND REC 37.37 Tota 1 : 292.12 29241 5/23/2013 002424 PITNEY BOWES GLOBAL 1428301 -MY13 001.090.000.518 POSTAGE METER RENTAL: 275.00 Tota 1 : 275.00 29242 5/23/2013 000318 SHAMROCK PAVING INC PAY APP 6 303.303.160.595 EVERGREEN ROAD CONSTRUCT[( 617.50 Total : 617.50 29243 5/23/2013 002531 SIX ROBBLEES INC 5- 669168 101.042.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 38.39 Total : 38.39 29244 5/23/2013 001892 SKILLINGS CONNOLLY INC 8333 303.303.149.595 10 -008 E ON CALL ROW ACQUISITI 6,164.15 8334 303.303.168.595 RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION SER) 5,624.74 Total: 11,788.89 29245 5/23/2013 002540 SPOKANE HOUSE OF HOSE INC. 287685 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 35.59 Total : 35.59 29246 5/23/2013 002978 SPOKANE SODA WORKS M13195 101.000.000.542 REFINISH CAB OF SNOW PLOW 3,647.64 Total : 3,647.64 Page: 3 vchlist 05/23/2013 4:01:57PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 4 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund /Dept Description /Account Amount 29247 512312013 000311 SPRINT 959698810 -066 001.058.057.558 GPS PHONE: MAY 2013 70.16 Total : 70.16 29248 5/23/2013 001875 STRATA SP130085 -IN 303.303.156.595 0156 - MANSFIELD AVE CONNECTI 8,755.00 Total : 8,755.00 29249 5/23/2013 001464 TW TELECOM 05523389 001.076.305.575 INTERNETIDATAIPHONE LINES: ME 1,158.96 Total : 1,158.96 29250 5/23/2013 001792 WHITEHEAD, .JOHN EXPENSE 001.018.016.518 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 287.68 Total : 287.68 36 Vouchers for bank code. apbank Bank total : 288,476.67 36 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 288,176.67 1, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: 4 uchlist Voucher List Page: 1 05/2412013 11:12:36AM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund /Dept Description /Account Amount 29251 5/24/2013 003076 AMSDEN, ERICA Expenses 001.032.000.543 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 48.65 Total : 48.65 29252 5/24/2013 000334 ARGUS JANITORIAL LLC INVO08709 001.016.000 -521 PRECINCT JANITORIAL SERVICE: 2,386.87 Total : 2,386.87 29253 5/24/2013 000030 AVISTA 010119017 001.076.300.576 UTILITIES: PARKS MASTER AVISTA 7,783.99 April 2013 101.042.000.542 UTILITIES: PW MASTER AVISTA 25,186.50 Total : 32,970.49 29254 5/24/2013 001862 BISCHOFF, PATTY Expenses 001.076.300.576 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 59.61 Total : 59.61 29255 5/24/2013 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC 9432038 001.076.305.575 LINEN SUPPLYAND SERVICE AT C 364.70 9434098 001.076.305.575 LINEN SUPPLY AND SERVICE ATC 252.04 9436096 001.076.305.575 LINEN SUPPLYAND SERVICE AT C 250.10 S0053815 001.076.305.575 LINEN SUPPLY AND SERVICE ATC 177.82 50053876 001.076.305.575 LINEN SUPPLY AND SERVICE AT C 6.88 S0053903 001.076.305.575 LINEN SUPPLY AND SERVICE AT C 13.75 S0053998 001.076.305.575 LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT C 79.07 Total: 1,144.36 29256 5/24/2013 001961 BUDANO, RANDY Expenses 001.032.000.543 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 22.04 Total : 22.04 29257 5/24/2013 001169 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY May 2013 001.058.056.558 PETTY CASH: 8746, 47,48, 49 42.50 Total : 42.50 29258 5/24/2013 000109 COFFEE SYSTEMS INC 3820:134275 001.076.305.575 COFFEE SUPPLIES AT CENTERPU 63.75 Total : 63.75 29259 5/24/2013 003083 DEBOISE, BRITTANI Expenses 001.076.305.575 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 16.95 Total : 16.95 29260 5/24/2013 000823 DEPT OF L & 1 233434 001.076305.575 BOILER INSP: CENTERPLACE 129.00 Total : 129.00 Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List Rage: 2 05124/2013 11:12:36AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund /Dept Description /Account Amount 29261 5/24/2013 001249 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY P29675010101 001.076.301.571 SUMMER PROGRAM SUPPLIES 291.37 Total: 291.37 29262 5/24/2013 000011 GREATER SPOKANE VALLEY 29263 5/24/2013 002882 HOFFMAN MUSIC COMPANY 29264 5/24/2013 000741 HONEY BUCKETS 29265 5/24/2013 000070 INLAND POWER & LIGHT CO 29266 5/24/2013 000388 IRVIN WATER DIST. #6 29267 5/24/2013 001635 ISS FACILITYIEVENT SERVICES 29268 5/24/2013 001944 LANCER LTD 29269 5/24/2013 000132 MODERN ELECTRIC WATER CO 29270 5/24/2013 000624 NAIL SEMINARS GROUP 2013 001.090.000.550 2013 OUTSIDE AGENCY: ECO DEV 4,445.19 Total : 4,445.19 SI- 223379 001.076.305.575 AN SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 86.93 Total : 86.93 1- 654604 001.076.300.576 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL: PARKS 154.00 Total : 154.00 94202 101.042000.542 UTILITIES: APRIL PW 336.70 Total : 336.70 April 2013 001.076.300.576 UTILITIES: PARKS 166.00 Total : 166.00 468002 001.076.305.575 EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLAI 433.40 482076 001.076.305.575 EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLA( 29.56 482079 001.076.305.575 EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLA( 118.20 482184 001.076.305.575 EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLA( 78.80 504813 001.076.305.575 EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLA( 68.96 515442 001.076.305.575 JANUARY 2013 MONTHLY CLEANI� 7,136.00 586013 001.076.305.575 EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLA( 168.56 589411 001.076.305.575 EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLA( 286.56 Total : 8,320.04 0436498 001.076.305575 BROCHURES /PRINTING FOR CP 402.19 0436646 001.076.305.575 BUSINESS CARDS: CARTER AND C 61.15 Total : 463.34 April 2013 001.076.302.576 UTILITIES: PARKS 1,389.99 April 2013 101.042.000.542 UTILITIES: PW 7,943.97 Total : 9,333.96 401273650 -001 001.076.305.575 EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE - DOBI 199.00 Page: 2 vchlist Voucher List Page: 3 0512412013 11:12:36AM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund /Dept Description /Account Amount 29270 5/24/2013 000624 000624 NATL SEMINARS GROUP (Continued) Total : 199.00 29271 5/24/2013 0000997 OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY SR23239001 001.076.305.575 ELEVATOR SERVICE AT CENTERPI 739.16 Total : 739.16 29272 5/24/2013 001084 PAPICH, JENNIFER Expenses 001.076.301.571 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 146.84 Expenses 001.076.301.571 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 74.58 Total : 221.42 29273 5/24/2013 001860 PLATT 3762474 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 285.02 Total : 285.02 29274 5/24/2013 002592 PURE FILTRATION PRODUCTS 15460 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 139.70 Total : 139.70 29275 5/24/2013 000019 PURRFECT LOGOS, INC. 31206 001.016.000.521 SIGNAGE FOR PRECINCT 26.63 31229 001.076.305.575 POLOS AND JACKETS FOR CP 209.79 Total : 236.42 29276 5/24/2013 000836 SCHULTZ, WILLIAM J. Expenses 001.058.056.558 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 399.70 Tota I : 399.70 29277 5/24/2013 000323 SPOKANE CO UTILITIES May 2013 001.076.302.576 SPOKANE CO SEWER CHRGS: MA 1,520.20 Total : 1,520.20 29278 5/24/2013 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST #3 May 2013 101.042.000.542 WATER CHARGES: PW 70.46 Total : 70.46 29279 5/24/2013 003349 SPOKANE KIDS CALENDAR 201323 001.076.305.575 BUSINESS LISTING PACKAGE: CP, 640.00 Total : 640.00 29280 5/24/2013 001083 STANDARD PLBG HEATING CONTROLS 50765 001.076.305.575 SERVICE CALLAT CENTERPLACE 1,919.64 Total : 1,919.64 29281 5/24/2013 000773 STUDIO CASCADE, INC. 1812 001.076.000.576 PLANNING SUPPORT SERVICES 1,787.51 Total : 1,78751 29282 5/24/2013 001472 TESTAMERICA LABORATORIES 59006979 001.076.300.576 TCIPAANALYSIS: PARKS 27.00 Page: 3 vchlist 5/24/2013 Voucher List 5804 29287 Page: 4 05/24/2013 11:12:36AM Spokane Valley 5/24/2013 003128 YWCA OF SPOKANE May 2013 Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund /Dept Description /Account Amount 29282 5/24/2013 001472 001472 TESTAMERICA LABORATORIES (Continued) Total : 27.00 29283 5/24/2013 001911 THE GLOVER MANSION CP795 001.076.305.575 EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLAf 152.18 CP847 001.076.305.575 EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLA( 45.27 Total : 197.45 29284 5/24/2013 002576 TUNE TALES MUSIC, INC April 2013 001.076.301.571 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 397.50 Total : 397.50 29285 5/24/2013 000167 VERA WATER & POWER 2013 101.042.000.542 UTILITIES: APRIL 2013 2,764.41 29286 5/24/2013 003175 VISIT SPOKANE 5804 29287 5/24/2013 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 0057250- 1518 -3 29288 5/24/2013 003128 YWCA OF SPOKANE May 2013 38 Vouchers for bank code: apbank 38 Vouchers in this report Total : 105.000.000.557 2013 LODGING TAX REIMBURSEMI Total : 402.402.000.531 WASTE MANAGEMENT: APRIL 201: Total : 001.090.000.550 SOCIAL SVCS GRANT REIMBURSE Total Bank total Total vouchers 2,764.41 13,339.10 13,339.10 5,803.80 5,803.80 886.77 886.77 92,056.01 92,056.01 Page: 4 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 05/3112013 3:04:06PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund /Dept Description /Account Amount 29289 5/31/2013 003076 AMSDEN, ERICA EXPENSE 001.032.000.543 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 24.88 Total : 24.88 29290 5/31/2013 003369 ASHLIN FINCH COMPANY CRYWOLF 001.000.000.342 FALSE ALARM REFUND: PERMIT V 50.00 Total : 50.00 29291 5/31/2013 001012 ASSOC BUSINESS SYSTEMS 637520 001.013.015.515 COPIER COST: LEGAL 154.40 637670 001.058.050.558 COPIER COST: CD 362.34 Total : 516.74 29292 5/31/2013 002655 AZTECH ELECTRIC INC PAY APP 1 303.303.061.595 0061 - PINES ITS CONSTRUCTION 252,550.01 Total : 252,550.01 29293 5/31/2013 000673 BUDGET ARBOR & LOGGING LLC 11 -1859 101.042.000.542 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,304.40 Total : 1,304.40 29294 5/31/2013 000796 BUDINGER & ASSOC INC M12517 -2 101.042.133.595 12 -022 L MATERIALS TESTING 013: 362.66 Total : 362.66 29295 5/31/2013 003224 CAD OF SPOKANE, INC 24294 101.042.000.543 MAINT SERVICE FOR SHOP 810.19 Total : 810.19 29296 5/31/2013 001122 CAMERON- REILLY, LLC PAY APP 1 303.303.146.595 0146 - 24TH AVE SIDEWALK CONS' 210,106.27 Tota 1 : 210,106.27 29297 5/31/2013 000835 CERIUM NETWORKS LLC 032595 001.090.000.518 HARDWARE CONTRACT 9,148.80 Tota 1 : 9,148.80 29298 5/31/2013 001880 CROWN WEST REALTY LLC JUNE 2013 101.042.000.543 COMMON AREA MAINT FACILITY C 168.21 Total : 168.21 29299 5/31/2013 000683 DAVID EVANS & ASSOCIATES 331593 001.058.055.558 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 880.00 Total : 880.00 29300 5/31/2013 000734 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION RE- 313- ATB30514074 101.042.000.542 INTELLIGENT TRAFFIC SYSTEMS,' 173.39 Total : 173.39 Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 05/31/2013 3:04 :06PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund /Dept Description /Account Amount 29301 5/31/2013 003368 ENVIROTECH SERVICES INC CRYWOLF 001.000.000.342 FALSE ALARM REFUND: PERMIT V 35.00 Total : 35.00 29302 5/31/2013 001926 FARR, SARAH EXPENSE 001.018.014.514 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 59.33 Total: 59.33 29303 5/31/2013 003261 FEHR & PEERS 86831 303.303.159.595 0159 - UNIVERSITY ROAD OVERPA 20,187.54 Total : 20,187.54 29304 5/31/2013 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 39914 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 57.60 39918 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 47.60 39919 001.058.056.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 106.25 Total : 211.45 29305 5/31/2013 002992 FREEDOM TRUCK CENTERS PCO01134453:01 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 48.86 Total : 48.86 29306 5/31/2013 001728 HP FINANCIAL SERVICES CO 600370846 001.090.000.548 SCHEDULE 572D8DD: 617 - 71612013 550.02 600370969 001.090.000.548 SCHEDULE 572DA494: 6/19 - 7118/1; 839.80 600370970 001.090.000.548 SCHEDULE 572DD016: 6111 - 7/1011 745.84 Total : 2,135.66 29307 5/31/2013 002520 HUSKY INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 84217 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 349.32 84218 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 22.70 84226 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 101.09 Total : 473.11 29308 5/31/2013 000265 JACKSON, MIKE JUNE 2013 001.013.000.513 JUNE 2013 AUTO ALLOWANCE 300.00 Total : 300.00 29309 5/31/2013 000786 K & N ELECTRIC MOTORS INC_ 0109832 402.402.000.531 SPRAGUE & BEST FLOAT TEST 1,034.03 Total : 1,034.03 29310 5/31/2013 003238 KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS 11226410 - 0413 402.402.000.531 DECANT FACILITY STUDY 3,887.90 Total : 3,887.90 29311 5/31/2013 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 657310602001 001.032.000.543 SUPPLIES: PW 43.35 657655759001 001.018.014.514 SUPPLIES: FINANCE 5433 Page: 2 vchlist Voucher List Page: 3 05131/2013 3:04:06PM Spokane Valley Bank code. apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund /Dept Description /Account Amount 29311 5/31/2013 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. (Continued) 657655957001 001.018.014.514 SUPPLIES: FINANCE 146.99 657769503001 001.076.301.571 SUPPLIES: PARKS AND REC 64.45 Total : 349.12 29312 5/31/2013 000307 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER APRIL 2013 001.016.000.586 STATE REMITTANCE 49,688.66 Total : 49,688.66 29313 5/31/2013 000019 PURRFECT LOGOS INC. 31114 101.000.000.542 DECALS FOR MA1NT SHOP 21.52 31294 101.000.000.542 DECALS FOR MAINT SHOP 76.63 Total : 98.15 29314 5113112013 001071 ROAD PRODUCTS INC. PAY APP 2 303223.40.00 RETAINAGE RELEASE FOR PROJE 311.16 Total : 311.16 29315 5/31/2013 000308 SPOKANE CO PROSECUTING ATTY APRIL 2013 001.016.000.586 CRIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION F 702.71 Total : 702.71 29316 5/31/2013 000459 SPOKANE CO TITLE CO 5- 190762 303.303.149.595 SIDEWALK INFILL CIP 0149 402,19 5- 191027 303.303.149.595 SIDEWALK INFILL PROJECT CIP 01 1,206.57 Total : 1,608.76 29317 5/31/2013 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 51501609 001.016.000.523 APRIL 2013: HOUSING INVOICE 106,447.00 Total : 106,447.00 29318 5/31/2013 002978 SPOKANE SODA WORKS M13237 101.000.000.542 5 -203 REFINSH CAB 4,780.67 Total : 4,780.67 29319 5/31/2013 001875 STRATA SP130107 -IN 311.000.174.595 SULLIVAN RD PRESERVATION PRC 1,084.31 Total : 1,084.31 29320 5/31/2013 002254 TOWEY, TOM EXPENSE 001.011.000.511 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 103.42 Total : 103.42 29321 5/31/2013 002185 URS CORPORATION 5503985 001.058.158.558 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,545.44 Total : 5,545.44 29322 5/31/2013 000087 VERIZON WIRELESS 9705069736 001.016.000.521 AIR CARD FOR POLICE CHEIF 40.01 Page: 3 vchlist Voucher List Page: 4 05/31/2013 3:04:06PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund /Dept Description /Account Amount 29322 5/31/2013 000087 VERIZON WIRELESS (Continued) 9705070947 29323 5/31/2013 003210 WEST CONSULTANTS, INC. 003854 29324 5/31/2013 000980 WESTERN SYSTEMS 0000023545 29325 5/31/2013 001885 ZAYO GROUP LLC MAY 2013 Total : MAY 2013 B 529130114 5/31/2013 002244 AOT PUBLIC SAFETY CORPORATION SPKVLY- 41 530130040 5/31/2013 000497 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON JUNE 2013 530130044 5/31/2013 000001 SPOKANE COTREASURER 9290200466 40 Vouchers for bank code. apbank 40 Vouchers in this report 001.016.000.521 AIR CARDS FOR POLICE DEPARTh 803.20 Total : 843.21 001.058.055.558 SALTESE CREEK FLATS FLOODPL 1,397.66 Total : 1,397.66 101.042.000.542 32ND AND BOWDISH SIGNAL UPGI 14,339.64 Total : 14,339.64 001.090.000.518 HIGH SPEED INTERNET CITY HALL 558.38 101.042.000.542 DARK FIBER LEASE 242.39 Total : 800.77 001.016.000.521 CRYWOLF CHARGES: APRIL 2013 3,531.68 Total : 3,531.68 204.204.000.592 DEBT SERVICE 2003 LTBO BONDS 184,011.25 Total: 184,011.25 001.016.000.521 LAW ENFORCEMENT: MAY 1,529,813.00 Total : 1,529,813.00 Bank total : 2,409,885.04 Total vouchers: 2,409,885.04 Page: 4 vehlist Voucher List Page: 1 0513112013 1:26:36PM Spokane Valley Bank code: Pk -ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund /Dept Description /Account Amount 5568 5/31/2013 000694 AVISTA UTILITIES PARKS REFUND 001237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: ROOM 109 412: 52.00 Total : 52.00 5569 5/31/2013 000321 GREATER SPOKANE ING PARKS REFUND 001237.10.99 DEPOSIT RFFUND! GREAT ROOM'. 210.00 Total : 210.00 5570 5/31/2013 003375 HAAKON INDUSTRIES PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: TERRACE VIEV 52.00 Total : 52.00 5571 5/31/2013 003374 HOLMAN, SANDRA PARKS REFUND 001,237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MISSION PARK 52.00 Total : 52.00 5572 5/31/2013 003376 LAYTON, RICK PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU PAF 52.00 Total : 52.00 5573 5/31/2013 003373 LEWIS, JERRE PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: DISCOVERY PL 52.00 Tota I : 52.00 5574 5/31/2013 003378 NOLTING, COLLEEN PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND: AAF 100.00 Total : 100.00 5575 5/31/2013 003371 NUMERICA CREDIT UNION PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: ROOM RENTAL 42.00 Total : 42.00 5576 5/31/2013 003370 ORRINO, DEBRA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREAT ROOM! 210-00 Total : 210.00 5577 5/31/2013 002899 PACIFIC CONTRACT & LASER, INSTITUT PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: AUDITORIUM 5 52.00 Total : 52.00 5578 5/31/2013 003372 RCAC ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: ROOM 109 CAS 52.00 Total : 52.00 5579 5/31/2013 000499 SPOKANE CO LIBRARY DIST PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREAT ROOM i 1,000.00 Total : 1,000.00 5580 5/31/2013 001342 WA BASSET RESCUE PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: SULLIVAN PART 52.00 Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 05131/2013 1:26:36PM Spokane Valley Bank code: pk -ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept Description /Account Amount 5580 5/31/2013 001342 001342 WA BASSET RESCUE (Continued) Total : 52.00 13 Vouchers for bank code: pk -ref Bank total : 1,978.00 13 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 1,978.00 I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: 2 vchlist Voucher List page: 1 06/03/2013 9:49:10AM Spokane Valley Bank code: pk -ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund /Dept Description /Account Amount 5581 6/3/2013 003372 RCAC ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: ROOM 109 CAN 502.00 1 Vouchers for bank code : pk -ref 1 Vouchers in this report 1, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Mayor Date Council Member Date Total : Bank total : Total vouchers: 502.00 502.00 502.00 Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List page: 1 06/03/2013 4:18:19PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund /Dept Description /Account Amount 29326 61312013 000271 BAINBRIDGE, CHRISTINE Expenses 001.013.000.513 EXPENSE REIMBUREMENT 267.89 Tota 1 : 267.89 29327 6/3/2013 001606 BANNER BANK 0797 001.011.000.511 APRIL2013: 0797 2,546.49 1423 001.032.000.543 APRIL2013:1423 716.45 2223 001.018.014.514 APRIL2013:2223 351.76 4064 001.058.055.558 APRIL2013:4064 1,136.75 4375 001.011.000.511 APRIL 2013: 4375 350.00 8861 001.076.305.575 APRIL2013:8861 834.99 Total : 5,936.44 29328 6/3/2013 001545 BERNARDO WILLS ARCHITECTS PC 2013 -1266 312.000.178.594 .JOINT PARK/LIBRARY SITE DEVEL+ 6,954.00 Total : 6,954.00 29329 6/3/2013 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC 9438146 001.076.305.575 LINEN SUPPLY AND SERVICE AT C 271.60 S0055286 001.076.305.575 LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT C 61.88 Total : 333.48 29330 6/3/2013 000326 CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION #19 May 2013 001.076.300.576 UTILITIES: PARKS 544.12 May 2013 101.042.000.542 UTILITIES: PW 323.62 Total: 867.74 29331 6/3/2013 000246 EAST SPOKANE WATER DIST #1 April 2013 001.076.300.576 WATER CHARGES: EDGECLIFF PA 446.07 May 2013 101.042.000.542 WATER CHARGES: PW 69622 Total : 1,142.29 29332 6/3/2013 002308 FINKE, MELISSA May 2013 001.076.301.571 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENTS 152.10 Total : 152.10 29333 6/3/2013 002607 HUB SPORTS CENTER May 2013 105.000.000.557 LODGING TAX REIMBURSEMENT:, 11,671.94 Total : 11,671.94 29334 6/3/2013 000252 LOWE'S BUSINESS ACCOUNT May 2013 001.076.305.575 OPERATING SUPPLIES 296.45 Total : 296.45 29335 6/3/2013 000193 NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC June 2013 001.090.000.518 CITY HALL RENT 33,333.33 Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 06/03/2013 4:18:19PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept Description /Account Amount 29335 6/3/2013 000193 000193 NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL I (Continued) Total 33,333.33 29336 6/3/2013 000019 PURRFECT LOGOS INC. 31301 001.076.305.575 METAL SIGN FOR CENTERPLACE 41 85 Total : 41.85 29337 6/3/2013 000415 ROSAUERS 679772 001.076.301.571 SUPPLIES FOR REC PROGRAMS 19.98 Total : 19.98 29338 6/3/2013 000658 SPOKANE CO SUPERIOR COURT May 2013 001.013.015.515 FILE COMPLAINT 3550.195 240.00 Total : 240.00 29339 6/3/2013 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST#3 May 2013 001.076.300.576 WATER CHARGES: PART{ ROAD PC 83.68 May 2013 001.076.300.576 WATER CHARGES: APPLEWAY BL1 51.86 May 2013 101.042.000.542 WATER CHARGES: PW 96.34 Total: 231.88 29340 6/3/2013 000404 SPOKANE VALLEY HERITAGE MUSEUM May 2013 105.000.000.557 LODGING TAX GRANT REIMBURSE 2,332.50 Total : 2,332.50 29341 6/3/2013 001791 STONE, MIKE Expenses 001.076.000.576 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 1,185.93 Total : 1,185.93 29342 6/3/2013 001911 THE GLOVER MANSION CP751 001.076.305.575 EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLAI 175.28 Total : 175.28 29343 6/3/2013 000140 WALPS MAILING SERVICE 36557 312.000.178.594 PARKS /LIBRARY PC 878.80 36557B 312.000.178.594 PARK/LIBRARY PC SERVICES 604.52 Total : 1,483.32 29344 6/3/2013 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 1825217- 2681 -6 001.076.305.575 WASTE MGMT: CENTERPLACE 743.48 1825218 - 2681 -4 001.016.000.521 WASTE MANAGEMENT: PRECINCT 284.00 1825219- 2681 -2 101.042.000543 WASTE MANAGEMENT: MAINT FAC 172.46 Total : 1,199.94 19 Vouchers for bank code: apbank 19 Vouchers in this report Bank total : 67,866.34 Total vouchers: 67,866.34 Page: 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 06 -11 -2013 Department Director Approval : ❑ Item: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Payroll for Period Ending May 31, 2013 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: OPTIONS: Budget/Financial impacts Employees Council Total Gross: $ 261,333.50 $ 5,475.00 $266,808.50 Benefits: $ 139,533.85 $ 9,133.93 $148,667.78 Total payroll $ 400,867.35 $ 14,608.93 $415,476.28 RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION STAFF CONTACT: Raba Nimri Approve Payroll DRAFT MINUTES City of Spokane Valley City Council Regular Meeting Formal Meeting Format Tuesday, May 28, 2013 Mayor Towey called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Attendance: City Staff Tom Towey, Mayor Mike Jackson, City Manager Gary Schimmels, Deputy Mayor Cary Driskell, City Attorney Dean Grafos, Councilmember Mark Calhoun, Finance Director Chuck Hafner, Councilmember Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney Rod Higgins, Councilmember Mike Stone, Parks & Rec Director Ben Wick, Councilmember Steve Worley, Senior Engineer Arne Woodard, Councilmember Eric Guth, Public Works Director Micki Hamois, Planner Rick VanLeuven, Police Chief Carolbelle Branch, Public Information Officer Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk INVOCATION: Pastor Rick Seavey of New Life Assembly of God Church gave the invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Towey led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the Amended Agenda. INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: May Community Recognition, Presentation of Key and Certificate Mayor Towey (see Mayor's Report) COMMITTEE, BOARD, LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS: Councilmember Hafner: reported that he attended the May sign dedication, and he extended thanks to Public Information Officer Branch for her work; went to the May 16 pancake feed with the bicyclists; attended a presentation from John Hohman concerning our permit process and the new portal system; participated in the SCOPE Board meeting as well as the 9 -1 -1 Emergency Committee meeting. Councilmember Higgins: stated that he also attended the sign dedication and the Smart Gov presentation; and went to the Library open house where they showed tentative plans for the use of the park; and attended the Appleway Trail open house. Deputy Mayor Schimmels: said he attended a Solid Waste Advisory Committee meeting about a week ago; went to the Sign Dedication; and said that last week West Valley City School brought over about 25 students and he, Councilmember Hafner, and Mayor Towey met with the students for about an hour for a question and answer session on council and government. Councilmember Grafos: said he attended the sign dedication, the SmartGov meeting, the Library meeting, and the Appleway Trail session, which he said was very well attended. Councilmember Wick: reported that he also attended the sign dedication, and remarked that it was nice the cost came in about half of what was originally budgeted; went to a high school senior presentation and said that the Valley Kiwanis raised enough money to award six scholarships to local high school students; and said he also attended the Chamber of Commerce breakfast last Friday. Council Regular Meeting 05 -28 -2013 Page 1 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT Councilmember Woodard: said during his various meetings that he met with a variety of citizens who expressed thanks for the entrance sign; said he went to the Appleway Trail meeting, and the Chamber of Commerce annual meeting. MAYOR'S REPORT: Mayor Towey reported that he was asked to speak at the Eastern Washington Forum Heritage Show put on by the museum; went to the campfire awards; and mentioned the leadership class that was held here as previously mentioned by Deputy Mayor Schimmels. Mayor Towey then announced that the Community Recognition recipient of the Key and Certificate for May goes to Jesse Sheldon, who was nominated by Tony Antonucci; and explained that Jesse is a Senior at Central Valley High School who four years ago started to form the Inland NW Baby organization, which helps distribute diapers for infants and toddlers in need; and said since they began, have distributed about 96,000 diapers. Mayor Towey said this generation has the passion, skills and energy required to make a difference in our community; and he proudly presented the City Key and Certificate to Jesse. Jesse thanked Council and Tony Antonucci for the recognition; adding that the organization now averages dispensing 100 diapers a week; said they have a storage space donated by the Paul Mitchell School; and again expressed his gratitude for this certificate, City Key, and recognition. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Draft 2014 -2019 Transportation Improvement Plan — Steve Worley Mayor Towey opened the public hearing at 6:25 p.m. Engineer Worley explained that annually staff puts together a six -year transportation improvement plan; that he added a few more projects within the funding level, and is open to Council's and the public's comments on the projects including the three new projects of Barker Road overpass, which he understands is Council's next highest priority after the Sullivan Bridge; the Barker Road to Euclid project; and Euclid to Trent. Mr. Worley also noted the Appleway Trail Phase 4 is included in the Plan, and would connect the trail from University Road to the Park Library site. There were no suggestions from Council. Mayor Towey invited public comment, and no comments were offered. Mayor Towey closed the public hearing at 6:29 p.m. 2. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. a. Approval of the following claim vouchers: 5/09/2013 4311 -4315, 4330, 29075 -29078 $252,331.44 5/09/2013 5555 -5566 $1,409.50 5/09/2013 5567 $550.00 5/09/2013 29079 - 29130, 502130037 $262,548.46 5/10/2013 29131 -29156 $93,851.60 5/17/2013 29157 -29212 $559,389.07 5/21/2013 4331 -4335, 29213 -29214 $71.002.16 GRAND TOTAL: $1,241,082. b. Approval of Payroll for period ending May 15, 2013: $296,606.98 c. Approval of Reappointment of Liz Beck to Tourism Promotion Area Commission d. Approval of May 14, 2013 Council Meeting Minutes, Regular Format e. Approval of May 21, 2013 Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the Consent Agenda. Council Regular Meeting 05 -28 -2013 Page 2 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT NEW BUSINESS: 3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 13 -005, Dangerous Dory Driskell After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to approve Ordinance 13 -005 amending Spokane Valley Municipal Code sections 7.30.035, 7.30.040, and 7.30.045. City Attorney Driskell said this has been discussed several times; and these changes will bring our regulations closer and more consistent with those of Spokane County; that it addresses that a violation would either be a misdemeanor or a gross misdemeanor, and aside from a few technical corrections, the other change addresses the insurance requirement. Mayor Towey invited public comment. No comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed. None. Motion carried. 4. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 13 -006 Amending 2013 Budget — Mark Calhoun After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to approve Ordinance 13 -006 amending Ordinance 12 -024 adopting a budget for the period January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013. After Finance Director Calhoun gave a brief overview of the history of this proposal and the resulting changes, Mayor Towey invited public comment. No comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed. None. Motion carried. 5. First Reading Proposed Ordinance 13 -007, Manufactured Homes on Individual Lots — Micki Harnois After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to advance Ordinance 13 -007, City initiated amendment CTA 2013 -0003, to a second reading. Planner Harnois explained that this amendment eliminates the "new manufactured home" requirement, and removes the definition of a new manufactured home. Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed. None. Motion carried. 6. Motion Consideration: Approval of 2014 -2019 Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan — Eric Guth It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to adopt the 2014 -2019 Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan and authorize the City Manager or designee to make application for grants to assist in funding the plan. Public Works Director Guth explained that Council and staff have discussed this six - year stormwater capital improvement plan several times, that the plan schedules capital improvement projects for the stormwater utility over a six -year period, that the projects are funded by the stormwater utility funds, and added that staff is working hard to find grants to help pay for the projects. Mr. Guth also noted staff will be doing an annual review on this so the next plan would be 2015 -2020. Mayor Towey invited public comments; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed. None. Motion carried. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: (moved to "Information Only ") 8. Advance Agenda — Mayor Towey Mayor Towey noted there are no agenda items for June 4 and he proposed Council cancel the meeting. There were no objections. City Manager Jackson noted that we are looking at the evening of June 18, from about 6 to 8 p.m. for a joint meeting with Council and the Planning Commission on the topic of development regulations for the Shoreline Management Plan. There were no objections. INFORMATION ONLY The items of (9) Department Monthly Reports; (10) Valley Corridor Environmental Assessment Project Update; (11) Planning Commission Minutes of April 11, 2013, and Council Regular Meeting 05 -28 -2013 Page 3 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT April 25, 2013; (12) Initiative 502 Initial Draft Rules and (7) Lodging Tax Funding Process were for information only and were not reported or discussed. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: City Manager Jackson said he received an e -mail from City Traffic Engineer Inga Note that WSDOT (Washington State Department of Transportation) approved our I -90 business loop signage, so now it is just a matter of time for them to develop an agreement and then actually schedule the work. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 6:46 p.m. ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Thomas E. Towey, Mayor Council Regular Meeting 05 -28 -2013 Page 4 of 4 Approved by Council: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 11, 2013 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 13 -007; CTA- 2013 -0003 City Initiated Amendment to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code to allow used manufactured homes on individual lots. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A.106, SVMC 17.80.150 and 19.30.040 BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission conducted a study session on March 28, 2013, followed by a public hearing on April 11, 2013. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the proposed amendment (see Attachments). On April 25, 2013, the Planning Commission approved their written Findings. The Planning Commission's recommendation was presented to Council at the May 14, 2013 study session. City Council conducted a first ordinance reading on May 28, 2013, voting unanimously to move the proposed ordinance to second reading. OPTIONS: Adopt Ordinance with or without additional amendments, send back to Planning Commission for further review, or direct staff further. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Ordinance 13 -007, City Initiated Amendment CTA 2013 -0003. BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A STAFF CONTACT: Micki Harnois, Planner ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance 2. Staff Report to Planning Commission 3. Planning Commission Findings 4. Planning Commission Minutes DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 13 -007 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON AMENDING SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 19.40.120 TO ELIMINATE THE "NEW MANUFACTURED HOME" REQUIREMENT, AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, on September 25, 2007, the City of Spokane Valley (City) adopted Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Title 19, pursuant to Ordinance 07 -015; and WHEREAS, on October 28, 2007, SVMC Title 19 became effective; and WHEREAS, such regulations are authorized by RCW 36.70A; and WHEREAS, the amendments set forth below are consistent with the goals and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, on March 27, 2013, the Washington State Department of Commerce was notified pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, providing a 60 -day notice of intent to adopt amendments to Spokane Valley development regulations; and WHEREAS, on March 28, 2013, the Planning Commission held a study session; and WHEREAS, on March 29, 2013 and April 5, 2013, notice of the Planning Commission public hearing was published in the Valley News Herald; and WHEREAS, on April 11, 2013, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, received evidence, information, public testimony, and a staff report with a recommendation followed by deliberations and provided a recommendation; and WHEREAS, on April 25, 2013, the Planning Commission approved the findings and recommendations; and WHEREAS, on May 14, 2013, City Council reviewed the proposed amendment; and WHEREAS, on May 28, 2013, City Council considered a first ordinance reading to adopt the proposed amendment; and WHEREAS, on June 11, 2013, City Council considered a second ordinance reading to adopt the proposed amendment; and WHEREAS, SVMC 19.40.120, as amended, bears a substantial relation to the public health, safety and welfare and protection of the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley do ordain as follows: Ordinance 13 -007 Page 1 of 4 DRAFT Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend SVMC 19.40.120, Manufactured Homes on Individual Lots, to allow used manufactured homes on individual lots. Section 2. Findings and Conclusions. The City Council acknowledges that the Planning Commission conducted appropriate investigation and study, held a public hearing on the proposed amendments and recommends approval of the amendments. The City Council hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Planning Commission, specifically that: A. Growth Management Act Policies - The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) provides that each city shall adopt a comprehensive land use plan and development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan. B. City of Spokane Valley Goals and Policies - The City of Spokane Valley has adopted goals and policies consistent with the GMA and adopted County -Wide Planning Policies, set forth below. 1. Land Use Goal LUG -2: Encourage a wide range of housing types and densities commensurate with the community's needs and preferences. 2. Housing Goal HG -1: Encourage diversity in design to meet the housing needs of the residents of the community and region. 3. Housing Policy HP -1.1: Consider the economic impact of development regulations on the cost of housing. 4. Economic Goal EDG -7: Maintain a regulatory environment that offers flexibility, consistency, predictability and clear direction. 5. Economic Policy EDP -7.2: Review development regulations periodically to ensure clarity, consistency and predictability. 6. Neighborhood Policy NP -2.1: Maintain and protect the character of existing and future residential neighborhoods through the development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations and joint planning. 7. Neighborhood Policy NP -2.2: Review and revise as necessary, existing land use regulations to provide for innovation and flexibility in the design of new residential developments, accessory dwelling units, and in -fill development. C. Conclusions 1. The amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies and goals for encouraging a mix of housing types in residential areas, establishing and maintaining a flexible and consistent regulatory environment and preserving and protecting neighborhoods. 2. The amendment bears substantial relations to public health, safety and welfare, and protection of the environment. 3. The proposed amendment will provide increased housing options and expand home occupations. 4. The proposed City initiated code text amendment is consistent with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan and the approval criteria in SVMC 17.80.150(F). 5. The Growth Management Act stipulates that the comprehensive land use plan and development regulations shall be subject to continuing review and evaluation by the City. The proposal is consistent with RCW 36.70A, Washington State Growth Management Act, which stipulates that the comprehensive land use plan and development regulations be subject to continuing review and evaluation by the City. Section 3. Spokane Valley Municipal Code Manufactured Homes on Individual Lots, is hereby amended to allow used manufactured homes on individual lots, as follows: Ordinance 13 -007 Page 2 of 4 DRAFT 19.40.120 Manufactured homes on individual lots. A. Pursuant to the requirements of RCW 35.21.684, the City does not discriminate against consumers' choices in the placement or use of a home that is not equally applicable to all homes. This section applies only to manufactured housing units placed on individual lots. B. Homes built to 42 U.S.C. 70 Sections 5401 through 5403 standards (as they may be amended) are regulated for the purposes of siting in the same manner as site -built homes, factory -built homes, or homes built to any other state construction or local design standard; provided, however, that the manufactured home shall: 1. Be tiew ffiaffttfaetd+e a -2-1. Be set upon a permanent foundation, as specified by the manufacturer, and that the space from the bottom of the home to the ground be enclosed by concrete or an approved product which can be either load - bearing or decorative; and �2. Comply with all local design standards, including the requirement for a pitched roof with a slope of not less than 3:12, applicable to all other homes within the neighborhood in which the manufactured home is to be located; and 43. Be thermally equivalent to the state energy code; and .4. Otherwise meet all other requirements for a designated manufactured home as defined in RCW 35.63.160. C. This section does not override any legally recorded covenants or deed restrictions of record. A "designated manufactured home" is a manufactured home constructed after June 15, 1976, in accordance with state and federal requirements for manufactured homes, which: 1. Is comprised of at least two fully enclosed parallel sections each of not less than 12 feet wide by 36 feet long; and 2. Was originally constructed with and now has a composition or wood shake or shingle, coated metal, or similar roof of nominal 3:12 pitch; and 3. Has exterior siding similar in appearance to siding materials commonly used on conventional site - built International Building Code single - family residences. D. An existing single wide manufactured home may be replaced with a new single wide manufactured home when replacement is initiated within 12 months of the date of damage which represents less than 80 percent of market value, or removal of existing habitable manufactured home. E. Manufactured homes with dimensional features that match or closely match the predominant manufactured home type within a manufactured home subdivision may be placed in the manufactured home subdivision Ordinance 13 -007 Page 3 of 4 DRAFT without regard to the age of the manufactured home. (Ord. 13 -001 § 3, 2013; Ord. 12 -007 § 2, 2012; Ord. 08- 026 § 3, 2008; Ord. 07 -015 § 4, 2007). Section 4. All other provisions of SVMC Title 19 not specifically referenced hereto shall remain in full force and effect. Section 5. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provided by law. Passed by the City Council this day of June, 2013. Mayor, Thomas E. Towey ATTEST: City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 13 -007 Page 4 of 4 S pokan�� jvalley, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CTA- 2013 -0003 STAFF REPORT DATE: March 20, 2013 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: April 11, 2013, beginning at 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers, Valley Redwood Plaza Building, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 101, Spokane Valley, Washington 99206. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: A city initiated text amendment to amend Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 19.40.120, Manufactured Homes on Individual Lots, to eliminate the requirement of "new manufactured homes ". PROPONENT: City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Suite 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Title 17 General Provisions. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Division recommends the Planning Commission approve the proposed amendment as put forth. STAFF PLANNER: Micki Harnois, Planner, Community Development Department ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Proposed text amendment to SVMC 19.40.120 A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. APPLICATION PROCESSING: SVMC Chapter 17.80, Permit Processing Procedures. The following summarizes application procedures for the proposal. Process Date Pre - Application Meeting: N/A Application Submitted: N/A Determination of Completeness: N/A Published Notice of Public Hearing: 3/29/13 & 4 -5 -13 Sent Notice of Public Hearing to staff /agencies: 3/27/13 PROPOSAL BACKGROUND: The proposal is to amend Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Chapter 19.40.120, Manufactured Homes on Individual Lots to eliminate the requirement of "new manufactured homes" (see Attachment A). The code defines "new" as not been previously titled to a retail purchaser or set on a property. This amendment will apply to any individual lot located in the City of Spokane Valley which is not located in a manufactured home park or manufactured home subdivision /community. The requirement of that a manufactured home to be a "designated manufactured home ", as described in SVMC Chapter 19.40.120 (C), will remain. A designated manufactured home is a home constructed after June 15, 1976, in accordance with state and federal requirements. A designated manufactured home must also meet the following standards per SVMC 19.40.120: 1. Is comprised of at least two fully enclosed parallel sections each of not less than 12 feet wide by 36 feet long; and 2. Was originally constructed with and now has a composition or wood shake or shingle, coated metal, or similar roof of nominal 3:12 pitch; and 3. Has exterior siding similar in appearance to siding materials commonly used on conventional site -built International Building Code single - family residences. Single wide manufactured homes do not meet the requirements of a "designated manufactured home ", so the proposed change to allow used manufactured homes on individual lots throughout the City would only apply to "double wide" manufactured homes. The provisions for single wide manufactured homes in manufactured home developments are referenced in SVMC Chapter 19.40.120 (E). 3. Staff has evaluated this change and is recommending allowing previously owned manufactured homes to be placed on individual lots. The Comprehensive Plan supports the diversity of housing types in residential areas and this would allow this flexibility by also increasing affordable housing options. B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE TEXT AMENDMENT 1. Compliance with Title 17 (General Provisions) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code a. Findings: SVMC 17.80.150(F) Municipal Code Text Amendment Approval Criteria The City may approve Municipal Code Text amendment, if it finds that (1) The proposed text amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan; Staff Analysis: The proposed amendment is consistent with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive plan goals for encouraging a mix of housing types in residential areas, maintaining a flexible and consistent regulatory environment, and preserving and protecting neighborhoods. Relevant Comprehensive Plan goals and policies are shown below: Page 2 of 3 Land Use Goal LUG -2 Encourage a wide range of housing types and densities commensurate with the community's needs and preferences. Housing Goal HG -1: Encourage diversity in design to meet the housing needs of the residents of the community and region. Housing Policy HP -1.1: Consider the economic impact of development regulations on the cost of housing. Economic Goal EDG -7: Maintain a regulatory environment that offers flexibility, consistency, predictability and clear direction. Economic Policy EDP -7.2: Review development regulations periodically to ensure clarity, consistency and predictability. Neighborhood Policy NP -2.1: Maintain and protect the character of existing and future residential neighborhoods through the development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations and joint planning. Neighborhood Policy NP -2.2: Review and revise as necessary, existing land use regulations to provide for innovation and flexibility in the design of new residential developments, accessory dwelling units, and in -fill development. (2) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; Analysis: The amendment bears substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare and protection of the environment. The proposed amendment will provide increased affordable housing options, expand home occupations, and establish a more consistent regulatory environment. b. Conclusion(s): The proposed text amendment is consistent with the approval criteria contained in the SVMC. 2. Finding and Conclusions Specific to Public Comments a. Findings: No public comments have been received to date. b. Conclusion(s): Public noticing has not been initiated for CTA- 2013 -0003 as of this date. 3. Finding and Conclusions Specific to Agency Comments a. Findings: No agency comments have been received to date. b. Conclusion(s): No concerns are noted. C. OVERALL CONCLUSION The proposed code text amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plans policies and goals. D. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Planning Division, after review and consideration of the submitted application and applicable approval criteria, recommends the proposal to eliminate the requirement of "new" manufactured homes on individual lots. Page 3 of 3 Signed FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF TI- E SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION April 25, 2413 The following findings are consistent with the Planning C'ommission's decision to recornmend approval. Background: 1. Spokane Valley development regulations wm adopted in September 2447 and became effective mi October 28, 2007. 2. The city - initiated code text amendment proposes to amend Spokane Valley M Lin icipaI Code (SVMC) 19.40.120, Manufactured Homes on Individual Lots, to eliminate the requirement of "new 110311uf t&Ured home ". 3. The Plaiinirig Commission head a public !tearing on April 11, 2013 and voted 6 -4 to recommend approval Qfthe amendment to City Council. Planning Commission Findings: 1. Compliance with 5VMC 17.80.15OF Approval Criteria FL. The proposed city initiated code text amendment is consistem with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive plan; Finding(s): i. Land Use Goal GUG -2 Encourage a wide range of hou5itig types and densities commensurate with the community'g needs and preferences. ii. Housing Goal HG -1; Encourage dlvursiLy in design to meet the housing needs of the residenlaofthe community and mgion. iii. Housing Policy 14P -1.1; Consider the economic impact of development regulations on the cost of housing. iv. Economic Goal EDG -7: Maintain a regulatory environment that offCrs flexihility, consistency, prWictabiIity and cicar direetioa. v. Economic Policy EDP -7.2: Review development regulations periodically to ensure clarity, consistency and predictahility. vi. Neighborhood Policy NP -2 -1: Maintain and protect the character of existing and future residential neighborhoods through the development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations andjoint planning_ vii. Neighborhood policy NP -2.2: Review and revise as necessary, existing land use regulations to provide for innovation and flexibility in the design of new residential developments, accessory dwelling units, and in -Fj II development. b. The proposed amendment hears a substantial relation to publie health, safety, welfare, and protection of the envirrnt men t. Padings aTid Raoinow3idaricifit df dte Spokane Valley Plano Ing Conimisslan Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT A Finding(s): i. The amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies and goats for encouraging a mix of housing types in residential areas, establishing and maintaining a flexible and consistent regulatory environment and preserving and protecling neighborhoods, ii. The amendment bears substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the env i non ment. iii. The proposed amendment will provide increased affordable housing options and expand home occupations. z. Conclusion(s): a. The proposed city initiated code, text amendment is consistent with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan and the approval criteria contained in SVMC 17,54,150(P). b. The Growth Management Act (GN4A) stipulates that the comprehensive land use plan and development regulations shall he subject to continuing review and evaluation by the City. Recommendations; The Spokane Va]ley Planning Corn wission therefore recommends City Council) adopt the proposed eiiy- initiated code text amendments to SVMC IP.40.120, Manufactured Flom es on IndividuaI trots. Appcd this 25'h day of April, 2013 BiW Bates, Chairman ATTEST: Cori Hinshaw, Planning Commission Secretary Findli�gs and Rmorn mendatIDns of theSpakarte Valley Planning Comm IssloA Page 2 of 2 Spokane Valley Planning Commission APPROVED Minutes Council C ham hers — City 11211,11707 E. Sprague Ave. April 11, 2013 L CALL TO ORDER Chair hates called the meeting to order at 6:00 p,tn 11, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C:vinmissiuners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. 111. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS Present Abment CITY STAFF Bill Bates -Chair x l- John Hohman, Director Joe Stoy - Vice- cl18ir x r Cary Driskell, City Attomey KiDbert WCitslin x f- Rad Higgins, City CounCil Mike Phillips x f Steven Neill x � Christina Carlsen x Kevin Anderson i x Mary Swank, secretary Commissioner Anderson was exqused. 1V. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Commissioner Slog made a motion to approve the agenda as presented. This motion was pa -Tsed unanimously. V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissianer Neill made a motion so approve the March 28, 2013 minutes as,presertied This Motion waspassed a nanimonsly. V1. PUBLIC COMMENT There was no public comment. V11. COMMISSION REPORTS Commissioner Dates reported that on April 40 our Representative, Cathy MoMords Rodgers was here and it went very yell. Ms. Rodgers commented our council did an excellent job on PIanring Commission Minutes Page 2 of 5 informing her on our cities priorities and wants to help with the Sullivan Bridge prgject and have information sent to her. VIII. ADMINISTRATITVE REPORT Community Development Director John Hohman explained staff is working on shoreline regulations and the 20I3 comprehensive plan amendments. We ,just received a draft on the shoreline regulations and are going through them. It will be a number of weeks before it is ready. We went to make sure it's easy for gas to understand and implement for any potential development. Mike Basinger is working on the comprehensive plan amendments. Scott Kuhta is out of town at the SEPA Committee in Olympia, working on Phase II. Our administrative report to Council on SEPA changes on Tuesday went well. They've authorized us to move forward to the first reading. Commissioner Stoy asked haw many comprehensive plan amendments we have this year. John Hch.ttman answomd we have hvo privately initiated and 5 to 6 city initiated. IX COMMISSION N BUSINESS Unfinished Business: No unfinished business. New Business: Public Ilearing: CTA - 2013 -O003 — Amending Manufactured Homes Regulations and CTA - 2013 - 0001— Amending Sign Rrgulations CTA -2013 -0403 John Holvmn started his presentaticn on CTA 2013 -0003, amending the SVMC 19.40.120 regm -ding manufactured homes. This is to eliminate the requirement for now manufactured homes in SVMC 19.40.120.5.1 and eliminate SVMC 19.40.120.0. The proposed amendment language will be changve that these provisions of the code will be removed. Once the language is removed then used manufactured homes will be a] lowed in the city. Commissioner Bates went over the procedures and opened the publie hearing at 6:12p.m. Commissioner Stoy read the rules. Commissioner McCaslin asked about homeowner covenants and associations. if somebody owns a lot in a preplanned community that they want to put a used manufactured home on does the homeowner associations have the power to deny that? John I-Iohmatt explained our code would not supersede any CC&R's or covenants. It would be a private issue. Commissioner McCaslin asked if homeowners associations have the power to keep someone from putting a manufactured home where the association would vote not to have one but what if they owned the lot. City Attorney Cary Driskell explained that CC&R's dictates w1w you can and cannot do with your property. CC &R's are a binding contract on that property, Commissioner Stay read tho rules of the Public hearing. Commissioner Bates opened public testimony. Public Comment was given by Tim B foyer at 11617 E Rego Court, Spokane Valley. Mr. Moyer stated there are a lot of areas where affoi*hle housing could help first time homebuyers but also provide housing for the rental market. Mr. Mnycr is in the process of Planning Commissinn Minutes I►sge 2 flf5 short plating a property on Bowdish and Valleyway. It has an existing 1950's home with a big lot. Mr. foyer is going to split if of the back and put a 2001 rLsed doublewide that is 50' x 24' that he found in the Valley and needs to be move. Mr. Moyer is in favor and hope it is approved. Commissioner Stoy asked how far Mr. Moyer is on his short plat. Mr. Moyer stated it's in process and being reviewed and it should be in final plat approval in about 3 to 6 weeks. commissioner Dates asked what Mr. Moyer planned to do with landscaping. Mr. Moyer responded that, he would make it look nice for the neighborhood and have a front and backyard, have a separate 24' x 30' foot garage with a concrete floor, and add sad and fencing to make it look like a rancher. It would be a permanent set foundation. Commissioner Bates closed public hearing at 6.22pm. Commissioner Sates asked do we have a motionfior amend7neni. Comwissioner �,;toy moved to proceed wlfh C'TA 2013 -0003 to city council. Discussion: Commissioner Neil and Commissioner Stoy commented that they support this project. it would be goad for the economy and help those families with less income, new starters and new families. Commissioner Bates supports this and talked about the Land Uge in our comprehensive plan that encourages needs and preferences and this does that. Commissioner .Sates asked if C'TA- 2013 -0003 should be approved. The wolion ryas passed unarnlmou,�fy. CTA - 2013 -0004 Chair Bates: Opened public hearing at 6:26 for CTA-201 3 -0 00 4. Con nissioner Stoy read the rules of the Public Hearing. John Hohman started presentation on CTA - 2013 -0404, sign code provisions. Mr. Hohman briefly reviewed 2012 sign code revision process, an overview nfthe changes, highlights of the public education code enforucrnent process, issues that came up with the code and our currently proposed provisions. Mr. Hohman reviewed the proposed sign rude changes, revisions from the attorney's office, minor clarifications and connections and a few other provisions that Dave not bean included yet. The changes would he presented with the Findings, depending on hove the Commission moved forward Commissioner Bates asked if Section D is new, w.by it is in the document and why scaled drawings are not. thin. Huhrfan stated Section D has not been included in the construction drawings. We had that required under a written policy from the first Building Official. Mr. Hohman stated that he asked Staff instead of having a written policy to incorporate this in the code. Mr., Phillips asked if scaled drawings are required for every sign application; if an engineer is required to stamp every drawing; and Whe would need two drawings if he put a sign in front of his building. Mr. Hohman stated that two scale drawings are required for the proposed sign. When you exceed 30 ft. them you need the engineer to approve that design. Commissioner Phillips asked if we have AutoCAD and computers now, why is a wet stamp required and not just a signed stamp. Mr. I4ohman stated this follows the standard code provisions but we will look into it. Commissioner Stoy asked if we still had an issue concerning statistics that were presented at the March 286 meeting. Mr. Hohman stated that it has not been resolved. Commissioner Stoy asked. under Section A, if he can have orie banner Planning Comrntssion Minutes Page 3 of 5 and two flags. Mr. Hohman stated yes, as businesses were surveyed. flags Lome in pair and this is how businesses like to display them. It could be distracting but staff felt it would be a goad option. Mr. Hohman stated that it depends on how the Commission feels and it could be looked at during deliberations. Ccmnzissioner Stoy asked if Section D is lined out because it is covered in the regulations, if it skill a requirement. Mr, Hohman confirmed that it is still a requirement. Commissioner Carmen inquired about increasing the arnnunt of freestanding signs for arterials and if there is a concern for temporary signs on arterial streets. Mr. Hohman stated that he hadn't heard of that issue, but if they were allowed rnultiple banners, one would be oft one side- street and another on arterial. Commissioner Carlsen asked how balloons are addressed if they are being taken out of Section G. Mr. Hohman stated, the Commission could recommend that change and for clarity the Ianguage rould be modified. Commissioner Carlsen expressed concern about the nurober of potential temporary signs at the Fred Meyer at Sul Iivan and Sprague, that it looks eery cluttered. She asked if Fred Meyer Gas and Fred Meyer Store can have mare signs and if the store separate from the gas station. Mr. 1- fohman responded that since they are separate they would be separate sums, it is something staff would look at for interpretation. Commissioner Hates asked if the dimension of reader boards is addressed in prohibited signs. 22.110,020. Mr. Hohman stated that they are not addressed at this time. Commissioner Bates stated that some are permanent and some are temporary but there are no square footage rules at this time. Mr. Holtman responded that reader boards have been considered portable signs that are prohibited_ However, through the yews they have been allowed to be permanently installed and viewed as a monument sign, which would regWre a permit. . Commissioner Bates closed the Public hearing at 6--53pm. Commissioner Mules asked if CTA- 2013-0004 should be approved, Commissioner Carisen moved to proceed with CTA -2013 -0004 to the City Council. Comments: Corurnissioner Bates commented that some things have been put off for a later time and some really good points have come up tonight. Commissioner Hates liked the idea of businesses having some flexibility on their signs and supports it. It's positive to our city. Commissioner McCaslin commended John on the proposals_ Commissioner Phillips stated after the last meeting he drove around and paid more attention to signs. Commissioner Phillips was surprised of the variety of the signs and how they are put up and that he can't even see have Mr. Hohman can come up with ideas for signs because there are so many different kinds. Commissioner Carlsen stated it has made this city look really nice and she has been looking at signs a lot lately. The Sprague corridor is noticeably clean. Commissioner Bates staters mast businesses do what they think they need to do and it is amazing how gaud they are at not blocking sidewalks, He rurther stated that the Commission hasn't discussed much oil clutter but that is a Future discussion. Commissioner Stay stated that the option for temporary signs will alleviate a lot of that clutter once this is accepted from City Council, Planning Commission Minutes pap 4 ors CoinrAissioner Bates risked if CTA- 2013 -0004 should be approved_ The wolion *as passed Unanimously. X. GOOD OF THE ORDER Theme was nothing for the good of the order. iii. ADJOURNMENT The being no other business the meeting was adjonrned at 7:03 p,m. Bill Bates, Chairperson Mwy Swankk Secretary Date signed Planning Cornalission Minuses Page 5 oFS CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Review Meeting Date: June 11, 2013 Department Director Approval Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First Reading Proposed Ordinance No. 13 -008: Comprehensive Plan Amendments (includes text and map amendments) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A, SVMC 17.80.140 and 19.30.010 PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: On May 21, 2013, staff presented City Council with an administrative report on the 2013 Comprehensive Plan amendments. City Council requested that parcel 35242.9012 be removed from CPA -03 -13 based upon public comment received by the Planning Commission. BACKGROUND: The Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 17.80.140 establishes an annual comprehensive plan amendment cycle that runs from November 2nd to November 1St of the following year. The Planning Commission considers applications received prior to November 1St in late spring of the following year, with a decision by City Council in late spring/early summer. For the 2013 Comprehensive Plan amendment period, the Community Development Department received two privately initiated requests for site - specific Comprehensive Plan amendments. In addition, the City is initiating one site - specific Comprehensive Plan amendment. Sites approved for a Comprehensive Plan amendment will receive a zoning classification consistent with the new land use designation. The 2013 Comprehensive Plan text amendments include amendments to six Comprehensive Plan Elements: Chapter 2 - Land Use, Chapter 3 — Transportation, Chapter 4 — Capital Facilities and Public Services, Chapter 7 — Economic Development, Chapter 10 - Neighborhoods, and Chapter 11 - Bike and Pedestrian. The amendments may also entail minor changes to other elements referencing the proposed amendments. On April 25, 2013, staff presented the proposed amendments to the Planning Commission at a study session. On May 9, 2013, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on each of the Comprehensive Plan amendments. After receiving public testimony, the Planning Commission deliberated and voted to forward CPA- 01 -13, CPA- 02 -13, CPA- 03 -13, CPA- 05 -13, CPA- 06 -13, CPA- 07 -13, CPA- 08 -13, CPA- 09 -13, and CPA -10 -13 to City Council with a recommendation for approval. Prior to voting CPA -09 -13 forward for City Council consideration, the Planning Commission approved modifications to CPA- 09 -13. On May 21, 2013, staff presented City Council with an administrative report on the 2013 Comprehensive Plan amendments. At the briefing, Council requested that parcel 35242.9012 be 1 of 2 removed from CPA -03 -13 to act in accordance with public comment received by the Planning Commission. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PROPOSALS: Comprehensive Plan amendment proposals are organized into individual reports consisting of application materials, staff reports, maps, and comments submitted to date to assist the City Council in its review. OPTIONS: Advance Ordinance No. 13 -008 to second reading with or without modifications, or take other action deemed appropriate. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to advance Ordinance No. 13 -008 to a second reading. STAFF CONTACT: Mike Basinger, AICP, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Ordinance No. 13 -008 with attached text and map 2. Signed Planning Commission Findings and Recommendation 3. Signed Planning Commission Minutes 4. PowerPoint Presentation [Note: Also reference yellow notebook: "2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments. "] 2 of 2 DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 13 -008 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, through Spokane Valley Ordinance No. 06 -010, the City of Spokane Valley adopted land use plans as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan, Capital Facilities Plan, and maps as the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Spokane Valley (as subsequently amended, the Comprehensive Plan); and WHEREAS, the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) allows comprehensive plans to be amended annually (RCW 36.70A.130); and WHEREAS, amendments to the City Comprehensive Plan may be initiated by the Planning Commission (Commission), the City Council (Council), citizens, or by the Community Development Director based on citizen requests or when changed conditions warrant adjustments; and WHEREAS, the GMA requires comprehensive plans to be implemented with development regulations, including the zoning of property consistent with land use map designations; and WHEREAS, consistent with the GMA, the City adopted public participation guidelines to direct the public involvement process for adopting and amending comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) provides that amendment applications shall be received until November 1 of each year; and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan, as originally adopted by Ordinance No. 06 -010, has been amended by Ordinance No. 07 -026, Ordinance No. 08 -011, Ordinance No. 09 -008, Ordinance No. 09- 039, Ordinance No. 10 -007, Ordinance No. 11 -001, Ordinance No. 11 -007, Ordinance No. 11 -009, Ordinance No. 12 -014, and Ordinance No. 12 -018; and WHEREAS, applications were submitted by the applicant, owner or by City staff to amend the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map for the purpose of beneficially using the property described herein; and WHEREAS, following the application to the City, staff conducted an environmental review to determine the potential environmental impacts from the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, on April 19, 2013, after reviewing the environmental checklists, staff issued Determinations of Non - Significance (DNS) for the proposals, published the DNS in the Valley News Herald, and where appropriate posted the DNS on the sites and mailed the DNS to all affected public agencies; and WHEREAS, on April 19, 2013, notice of the Commission public hearing was published in the Valley News Herald; and WHEREAS, on April 19, 2013, notice of the Commission hearing was mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of the subject property; and Ordinance 13 -008 Comp Plan Amendments Page 1 of 6 DRAFT WHEREAS, on April 19, 2013, notice of the hearing was posted on the subject properties; and WHEREAS, on April 25, 2013, the Commission conducted a briefing to review the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, on May 9, 2013, the Commission received evidence, information, public testimony, and a staff report and recommendation at a public hearing; and WHEREAS, on May 9, 2013, the Commission conducted a public hearing to consider proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. After receiving public testimony, the Commission deliberated and voted to forward CPA- 01 -13, CPA- 02 -13, CPA- 03 -13, CPA- 05 -13, CPA- 06 -13, CPA- 07 -13, CPA - 08-13, CPA- 09 -13, and CPA -10 -13 to Council with a recommendation for approval. Prior to voting CPA -09 -13 forward for City Council consideration, the Planning Commission approved modifications to CPA- 09 -13; and WHEREAS, on May 10, 2013, the Washington State Department of Commerce was notified pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106 providing a notice of intent to adopt amendments to the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, on May 21, 2013, Council conducted a briefing to review the proposed amendments. At the briefing, Council requested that parcel 35242.9012 be removed from CPA -03 -13 to adhere to the property owner's request that his property not be subject to the amendment set forth in CPA- 03 -13. WHEREAS, on June 11, 2013, Council considered a first ordinance reading to adopt the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, on July 9, 2013, Council considered a second ordinance reading at which time Council approved written findings of fact setting forth the basis for recommending approval of the proposed amendments. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley do ordain as follows: Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the Comprehensive Plan. Section 2. Findings. The Council acknowledges that the Commission conducted appropriate investigation and study and held a public hearing on the proposed amendments to Comprehensive Plan, and the Council hereby approves the amendments to the Comprehensive Plan map and text, with a modification to CPA -03 -13 to remove parcel 35242.9012 from CPA- 03 -13. The Council has read and considered the Commission's findings. The Council hereby makes the following findings: 1. SVMC 17.80.140 provides the framework for the public to participate throughout the Comprehensive Plan amendment process, including notice and public hearing requirements. 2. On April 19, 2013, notice for the proposed amendments was placed in the Valley News Herald and each site subject to a site - specific amendment was posted with a "Notice of Public Hearing" sign, with a description of the proposal. 3. On April 19, 2013, individual notice of the site - specific map amendment proposals were mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of each affected site. Ordinance 13 -008 Comp Plan Amendments Page 2 of 6 DRAFT 4. On May 10, 2013, the Washington State Department of Commerce was provided a notice of intent to adopt amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. 5. Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act set forth in RCW 43.21C (SEPA), environmental checklists were required for each proposed Comprehensive Plan map and text amendment. 6. Staff reviewed the environmental checklists and a threshold determination was made for each Comprehensive Plan amendment. 7. On April 19, 2013, Determinations of Non - Significance (DNS) were issued for the requested Comprehensive Plan amendments. 8. On April 19, 2013, the DNS's were published in the City's official newspaper, the Valley News Herald, consistent with SVMC 21.20. 9. The procedural requirements of SEPA and SVMC Title 21 have been fulfilled. 10. The Commission and Council have reviewed the proposed amendments concurrently to evaluate the cumulative impacts. The review was consistent with the annual amendment process outlined in SVMC 17.80.140 and RCW 36.70A. 11. On May 9, 2013, the Commission held a public hearing on each of the Comprehensive Plan amendments. After receiving public testimony, the Commission deliberated and voted to forward CPA- 01 -13, CPA- 02 -13, CPA- 03 -13, CPA- 05 -13, CPA- 06 -13, CPA- 07 -13, CPA- 08 -13, CPA- 09 -13, and CPA -10 -13 to Council with a recommendation for approval. 12. Prior to voting CPA -09 -13 forward for Council consideration, the Commission approved modifications to CPA- 09 -13. 13. The Commission adopted and incorporated by reference all findings of staff for CPA -01 -013 through CPA -03 -013 and CPA -05 -013 through CPA -10 -013. Such findings were included with the Commission's findings presented to Council. The Council hereby adopts and incorporates by reference all findings of staff for CPA -01 -013 through CPA -03 -013 and CPA -05 -013 through CPA - 10 -013, as adopted by the Commission; with the modification to remove parcel 35242.9012 from CPA- 03 -13. 14. The proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are consistent with GMA and do not result in internal inconsistencies within the Comprehensive Plan itself. 15. The site - specific map amendments will provide suitable land use designations consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 16. The goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan were considered and the proposed amendments are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 17. Findings were made and factors were considered to ensure compliance with approval criteria contained in SVMC 17.80.140H (Comprehensive Plan amendments and area -wide rezones). 18. The Comprehensive Plan land use map and text amendments will not adversely affect the public's general health, safety, and welfare. Ordinance 13 -008 Comp Plan Amendments Page 3 of 6 DRAFT Section 3. Property. The properties subject to this Ordinance are described in Attachment "A Section 4. Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130, the Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended as set forth in Attachment "A" (maps) and Attachment `B" (text). The Comprehensive Plan amendments are generally described as follows: Map Amendments File No. CPA -01 -13 Proposal: Site - specific Comprehensive Plan map amendment requesting to change the designation from Low Density Residential (LDR) with a Single - Family Residential (R -3) zoning classification to an Office (0) designation with a Garden Office (GO) zoning classification. Applicant: Arger Co. Real Estate, Inc., 300 N Mullan Road, Spokane Valley, WA 99206. Amendment Location: West 131 feet of parcel 45143.1328; generally located south of Springfield Avenue east of Evergreen Road; further located in the NW '/4 of the SW '/4 of Section 14, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. Council Decision: Change the west 131 feet of parcel 45143.1328 to Office (0). File No. CPA -02 -13 Proposal: Site - specific Comprehensive Plan map amendment requesting to change the designation from Low Density Residential (LDR) with a Single - Family Residential (R -3) zoning classification to a High Density Residential (HDR) designation with a High Density Multifamily Residential (MF -2) zoning classification. Applicant: Dennis Crapo, 2602 North Sullivan Road, Spokane Valley, WA 99216. Amendment Location: Parcels 55181.2602 and 55181.2604; generally located south of Sharp Avenue west of Barker Road; further located in the NE '/4 of the NE '/4 of Section 18, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. Council Decision: Change parcels 55181.2602 and 55181.2604 to High Density Residential (HDR). File No. CPA -03 -13 Proposal: Site - specific Comprehensive Plan map amendment requesting to change the designation from Office (0) with an Office (0) zoning classification to a Community Commercial (C) designation with a Community Commercial (C) zoning classification. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206. Amendment Location: Parcels 35231.0603, 35231.9106, 35242.9010, and 35242.9011; generally located south of Interstate 90 and north of 4th Avenue; further located in Sections 23 & 24, Township 25 North, Range 43 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. Council Decision: Change parcels 35231.0603, 35231.9106, 35242.9010, and 35242.9011 to Community Commercial (C). File No. CPA- 04 -13: Withdrawn Text Amendments File No. CPA -05 -13 Proposal: Chapter 2 — Land Use: City initiated Comprehensive Plan amendments will update Figure 2.1 Land Use by Comp Plan Category, update section 2.4.1 Projected Growth, update Table 2.1 Land Capacity Analysis, and add policy language to support office uses in high - density residential zones. Map Ordinance 13 -008 Comp Plan Amendments Page 4 of 6 DRAFT 2.1 Land Use will display land use designation changes approved through the 2013 Comprehensive Plan amendment process. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206. Amendment Location: Not applicable. Council Decision: Adopt amendments to Chapter 2 — Land Use as proposed by staff. File No. CPA- 06 -13: Proposal: Chapter 3 — Transportation: City initiated Comprehensive Plan amendments will update section 3.4 Transit, add policy language to support the City's pavement management strategy, and update Map 3.1 Arterial Street Plan to reflect the removal of Appleway Boulevard extension. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206. Amendment Location: Not applicable Council Decision: Adopt amendments to Chapter 3 — Transportation as proposed by staff. File No. CPA- 07 -13: Proposal: Chapter 4 — Capital Facilities and Public Services: City initiated Comprehensive Plan amendments will update Table 4.4 Population Projections, modify Group B water system language to reflect changes by the Washington State Legislature, update Table 4.10 Spokane Valley Fire Department (SVFD) City Responses, update Table 4.11 SVFD Capital Projects Plan, update section 4.4.9 Library Service, update Table 4.15 Future Park Demand, update Table 4.17 Parks Capital Facilities Plan, remove Table 4.37 State Highways, add Pavement Preservation Fund and Table 4.37 Pavement Preservation Revenues and Expenditures, and update the 6 -year Transportation Improvement Program. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206. Amendment Location: Not applicable. Council Decision: Adopt amendments to Chapter 4 — Capital Facilities and Public Services as proposed by staff. File No. CPA- 08 -13: Proposal: Chapter 7 — Economic Development: City initiated Comprehensive Plan amendments will remove Figure 7.6 New Construction Permits Issued, remove Figure 7.7 Construction Valuation, remove Figure 7.8 Permit Revenues, add policy language to support AutoRow, and update Map 7.1 to reflect the latest Development Activity. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206. Amendment Location: Not applicable. Council Decision: Adopt amendments to Chapter 7 — Economic Development as proposed by staff. File No. CPA- 09 -13: Proposal: Chapter 10 —Neighborhoods: City initiated Comprehensive Plan amendments will add policy language to support access to healthy food. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206. Amendment Location: Not applicable. Council Decision: Adopt amendments to Chapter 10 —Neighborhoods as proposed by staff and modified by the Planning Commission. Ordinance 13 -008 Comp Plan Amendments Page 5 of 6 DRAFT File No. CPA- 10 -13: Proposal: Chapter 11— Bike and Pedestrian: City initiated Comprehensive Plan amendments will update Map 11.2 to include bike improvements developed in the 2012 development cycle and add a proposed Shared Use Path extension to connect newly purchased City property to the City's existing non - motorized network, update Map 11.4 Recommended Pedestrian Network to include pedestrian improvements developed in the 2012 development cycle, and add policy language supporting the use of CDBG funding for sidewalks in low income neighborhoods. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206. Amendment Location: Not applicable. Council Decision: Adopt amendments to Chapter 11— Bike and Pedestrian as proposed by staff. Section 5. Copies on File- Administrative Action. The Comprehensive Plan (with maps) is maintained in the office of the City Clerk as well as the City's Department of Community Development. The City Manager or designee, following adoption of this Ordinance, is authorized to modify the Comprehensive Plan in a manner consistent with this Ordinance. Section 6. Liabili . The express intent of the City is that the responsibility for compliance with the provisions of this Ordinance shall rest with the permit applicant and their agents. This Ordinance and its provisions are adopted with the express intent to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the general public and are not intended to protect any particular class of individuals or organizations. Section 7. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council this day of July, 2013 Mayor, Thomas E. Towey ATTEST: City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge Approved As To Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 13 -008 Comp Plan Amendments Page 6 of 6 ......... .... . .. .. ................ . ...... .... . ................... . . . . ...... ...... ..... ..... .......... Uli : • - �• .............. .. ....... .... ....... .. ��'��'-- - - - - -- Comprehensive Plan Map CPA -02 -13 City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map designation from LDR to HDR; subsequent zoning change from R -3 to MF -2. Comprehensive Plan Map CPA -03 -13 Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map City of Spokane Valley designation from O to C; subsequent zoning Community Development Department change from 0 to C. City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan CHAPTER 2 — LAND USE 2.0 Introduction The Land Use chapter serves as the foundation of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan (SVCP) by providing a framework for Spokane Valley's future physical development and by setting forth policy direction for Spokane Valley's current and future land uses. Development of land, according to adopted policies and land use designations discussed in this chapter, should result in an appropriate balance of services, employment, and housing. The land use policies are supplemented by a Comprehensive Plan Map (Map 2.1) that provides a visual illustration of the proposed physical distribution and location of various land uses. This map allocates a supply of land for such uses as retail, office, manufacturing, public facilities, services, parks, open space, and housing to meet future demand. 2.1 Planning Context State and locally adopted county -wide land use policies provide a statutory framework for the development of City land use policies. It is important to briefly review state and county level policies to better understand historical conditions that have shaped the goals and policies in this chapter. 2.1.1 Growth Management Act The Growth Management Act (GMA) acknowledges that, "...a lack of common goals expressing the public's interest in conservation and the wise use of our lands, pose a threat to the environment, sustainable economic development, and the health, safety and high quality of life enjoyed by residents of this state'." The GMA provides a framework for content and adoption of local comprehensive plans. The GMA provides 14 goals to be, "...used exclusively for the purpose of guiding development of comprehensive plans and development regulations." GMA goals pertaining to land use include: • Urban Growth — Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner. • Reduce Sprawl — Reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling, low density development. • Housing — Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population of the state, promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage preservation of existing housing stock. • Open Space and Recreation — Encourage the retention of open space and development of recreational opportunities, conserve fish and wildlife habitat, increase access to natural resource lands and water, and develop parks. • Environment — Protect the environment and enhance the state's high quality of life, including air and water quality and the availability of water. • Public Facilities and Services — Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards. • Historic Preservation — Identify and encourage the preservation of lands, sites, and structures that have historical or archaeological significance. ' RCW 36.70A.010 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 1 of 35 Chapter 2 — Land Use City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Property Rights — Private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation having been made. The property rights of landowners shall be protected from arbitrary and discriminatory actions pursuant to state and federal law. The GMA requires that Comprehensive Plan land use elements: • Designate the proposed general distribution, location and extent of the uses of land for housing, commerce, industry, recreation, open spaces, public utilities, public facilities, and other appropriate land uses; • Population densities, building intensities, and estimates of future population growth; • Provide for protection of the quality and quantity of ground water use for public water supplies; • Review drainage, flooding, and stormwater runoff in the area and nearby jurisdictions and provide guidance for corrective actions to mitigate or cleanse those discharges that pollute water of the state. 2.1.2 County Wide Planning Policies The County Wide Planning Policies (CWPPs) required by GMA2 provide a regional framework to achieve the goals of the GMA. The CWPPs are a refinement of policy direction contained in the GMA and are a result of a collaborative process between Spokane County and the cities and towns within the County. The CWPPs provide a policy framework for both the county and its respective cities. Adherence to these policies ensures that plans within the county are consistent with one another. These policies address such issues as the designation of urban growth areas, land use, affordable housing, provision of urban services for future development, transportation, and contiguous and orderly development. The following are specific CWPPs that relate to the Land Use Element3: Policy Topic 1 - Urban Growth Areas Policies 1. Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) are areas within which urban growth shall be encouraged and outside of which growth can occur only if it is not urban in nature. Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) shall include areas and densities sufficient to permit the urban growth that is projected to occur in the county for the succeeding 20 -year period4. "Urban growth" refers to growth that makes intensive use of land for the location of buildings, structures and impermeable surfaces to such a degree as to be incompatible with the primary use of such land for the production of food, other agricultural products or fiber, or the extraction of mineral resources5. Urban growth should be located first in areas already characterized by urban growth that have existing public facility and service capacities to serve such development, and second in areas already characterized by urban growth that will be served by a combination of both existing public facilities and services, and any additional needed public facilities and services that are provided by either public or private sources. Further, it is appropriate that urban government services be provided by cities, and urban government services should not be provided in rural are as6. Rural government services may be provided in rural areas. However, Urban Growth Areas may be established independent of incorporated areas. Within these independent Urban Growth Areas (UGAs), urban governmental services may 2 RCW 36.70A.210 3 Note to reader: The following policies are numbered according to the policy number in the CWPPs, resulting in non - sequential numbering in this document. 4 RCW 36.70A.110 5 RCW 36.70A.030(17) 6 RCW 36.70A.110(3) Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 2 — Land Use Page 2 of 35 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan be provided by other than cities. Some cities may rely on contracts from Spokane County for provision of urban services. Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) include all lands within existing cities, including cities in rural areas. 9. Within Urban Growth Areas (UGAs), lands that fall within planned high- capacity transportation corridors should be designated for sufficient intensity of land use to support the economic provision of multimodal transportation. 11. Where applicable, comprehensive plans should contain land use policies which provide protection for the continued viability of Fairchild Air Force Base, Spokane International Airport, Felts Field, Deer Park Airport and other publicly owned airports within Spokane County. 12. Jurisdictions should work together to protect critical areas and open space within Urban Growth Areas (UGAs). Policy Topic 2 - Joint Planning within UGAs Policies 1. The joint planning process should: a. Include all jurisdictions adjacent to the Urban Growth Area and Special Purpose Districts that will be affected by the eventual transference of governmental services; b. Recognize that Urban Growth Areas are potential annexation areas for cities; c. Ensure a smooth transition of services amongst existing municipalities and emerging communities; d. Ensure the ability to expand urban governmental services and avoid land use barriers to expansion; and e. Resolve issues regarding how zoning, subdivision and other land use approvals in designated joint planning areas will be coordinated. 2. Joint planning may be accomplished pursuant to an interlocal agreement entered into between and /or among jurisdictions and /or special purpose districts. Policy Topic 3 — Promotion of Contiguous and Orderly Development and Provision of Urban Services Policies 5. All jurisdictions shall coordinate plans that classify, designate and protect natural resource lands and critical areas. 7. Each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan shall include, at a minimum, the following policies to address adequate fire protection: a. Limit growth to areas served by a fire protection district or within the corporate limits of a city providing its own fire department. b. Commercial and residential subdivisions and developments and residential planned unit developments shall include the provision for road access adequate for residents, fire department or district ingress /egress, and water supply for fire protection. c. Development in forested areas must provide defensible space between structure and adjacent fuels and require that fire -rated roofing materials be used. 10. Each jurisdiction shall include provisions in its comprehensive plan for equitable distribution of essential public facilities. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 3 of 35 Chapter 2 — Land Use City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 13. Each jurisdiction shall plan for growth within UGAs which uses land efficiently, adds certainty to capital facilities planning and allows timely and coordinated extension of urban governmental services, public facilities and utilities for new development. Each jurisdiction shall identify intermediate growth areas (six to ten year increments) within its UGA or establish policies which direct growth consistent with land use and capital facility plans. Policy Topic 4 — Parks and Open Space Policies 2. All jurisdictions should cooperate to identify and protect regional open space lands, natural areas and corridors of environmental, recreational and aesthetic significance to form a functionally and physically connected system which balances passive and active recreational uses. Each jurisdiction shall identify open space corridors within and between urban growth areas. All jurisdictions shall identify implementation, management, preservation and conservation strategies through both regulatory and non - regulatory techniques, to protect identified lands and corridors to sustain their open space benefits and functions. Implementation and management strategies should include collaboration and coordination with land trusts and other land preservation organizations. 3. Each jurisdiction shall require the development of parks and open space as a means to balance the impacts associated with higher- density development. 5. Each jurisdiction shall make appropriate provisions for parks and recreation areas. Policy Topic 5 - Transportation Policies 5. Local jurisdictions shall develop and adopt land use plans that have been coordinated through the Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) to ensure that they preserve and enhance the regional transportation system. These plans may include high- capacity transportation corridors and shall fulfill air quality conformity and financial requirements of Federal Transportation Laws and Regulations, the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, and the GMA. Local jurisdictions shall designate within land use plans areas that can support public transportation services. These areas shall include existing as well as new development. Each jurisdiction's land use plan, the regional transportation plan and the Spokane Transit Authority's (STA) Long Range Transit Plan shall support, complement and be consistent with each other. 11. Each jurisdiction shall address land use designations and site design requirements that are supportive of and compatible with public transportation, for example: a. pedestrian -scale neighborhoods and activity centers; b. mixed -use development; and c. pedestrian friendly and non - motorized design. Policy Topic 7 — Affordable Housing Policies 2. Each jurisdiction's development policies, regulations and standards should provide for the opportunity to create affordable housing in its community. Such policies may include regulatory tools, such as inclusionary zoning, performance /impact zoning, mixed -use development and incentives for increasing density to promote greater choice and affordable housing in its community. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 4 of 35 Chapter 2 — Land Use City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 6. In conjunction with other policy topics, coordinate housing, transportation and economic development strategies to ensure that sufficient land and densities for affordable housing are provided in locations readily accessible to employment centers. 2.2 Land Use Plan As shown in Figure 2.1 below, the majority of land is designated residential (4962 %) under this Plan. Of the land designated residential,5�54% is designated as Low Density Residential with densities up to six dwelling units per acre. Neapl�--�Twenty percent 44--of the land area is designated as Heavy and Light Industrial. The remaining land is designated as commercial, office, mixed use or parks /open space. Figure 2.1: Land Use by Comp Plan Category Parks and Regional Community Open Space Commercial Commercial NOffice I1 % r 3% 2% � Corridor Mixed Use Doi 1 ° Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 5 of 35 Chapter 2 — Land Use City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Figure 2.1: Land Use by Comp Plan Category Neiahborhood Mixed Use Cente 3.5% Medium Density _ Residential 4.1% Light Industrial 5.1% Office Parks and Regional Community 9 n0/ Open Space Commercial Commercial Corridor Mixed Use 3.2% 2.3% 4.2% High Density oe,i.+e., +iii Low Density Resid 54.2% 2.2.1 City Center Plan Heavy Industrial 15.2% This scenario presents concepts and strategies for creating a definable and vibrant "City Center" for the City of Spokane Valley. The purposes of creating a Spokane Valley City Center are: 1. Create an identifiable city center that is a social and economic focus of the City; 2. Strengthen the City overall by providing for long -term growth in employment and housing; 3. Promote housing opportunities close to employment and services; 4. Develop land use patterns that support the development of a more extensive regional transportation system, whatever the ultimate configuration may be; 5. Reduce dependency on automobiles; 6. Consume less land with urban development; 7. Maximize the public investment in infrastructure and services; 8. Provide a central gathering place for the community; and 9. Improve the quality of design for development throughout the City. There are several reasons why a definable, vital City Center is important to Spokane Valley's future. These include: The development of a more intensive, multi -use city center is a natural step in Spokane Valley's evolution. Most new urban areas start out as bedroom communities. Retail and commercial uses then develop to serve the new residential population. Office and industrial activities next begin to locate at key transportation crossroads, adding jobs and strengthening the employment base. Spokane Valley has experienced these evolutionary phases and is now ready for a defined City Center. 2. Economic Development — Spokane Valley has an opportunity to transform itself from an essentially residential community with retail and service based economy to a sub - regional economic center with an expanded, more diverse employment base. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 6 of 35 Chapter 2 — Land Use City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 3. Community Support — A survey of Spokane Valley area citizens prior to incorporation overwhelmingly indicated that the lack of identifiable "downtown" and a community gathering place was of concern to a majority of respondents. Community support was tested again when the city conducted a statistically valid survey in the spring of 2004. The support to create a City Center was reiterated throughout the community meetings held during the development of the comprehensive plan and the city's informal community survey. A discussion of the results of the city's survey is included in Section 2.10. The following could be components of the City Center 1. Location: Generally located along the Sprague /Appleway corridor. 2. Size: Between 300 and 400 acres in size. 3. Streets: New streets could be added at every 200 to 400 feet to create an internal grid street system to provide an urban atmosphere. 4. On- street parking would be provided on internal grid streets. 5. Ground floor retail on both sides of streets. 6. Building out to the edge of the right -of -way and include wide sidewalks to encourage a lively street scene. 7. Office /Employment uses provided in high visibility locations with adequate parking and adjacent to pleasant surroundings such as open space, retail shops and services. 8. Multifamily housing that is safe, secure, and located so that it is buffered from traffic noise and provides a pedestrian friendly streetscape with connections to parks, schools, shopping, services and transit. 9. Civic /public uses such as city hall, community library, performing arts center, city center, park, green space or other public uses that would attract people to downtown over an extended portion of the day. Other characteristics of this land use scenario include the following: Neighborhood /community retail centers - current land use patterns dictate that residents travel to the Sprague Avenue corridor to access some of the most basic goods and services. This scenario would provide for smaller scale, less intensive retail /commercial centers in the south end and northeast portions of the city. Potential locations for these centers would be focused at intersections of arterials at the periphery of the city, such as Highway 27/32nd Avenue, Dishman Mica Road /Bowdish Road and Barker Road /Boone Avenue. Office zoning districts — currently, there is no specific zoning district or comprehensive plan designation for professional office uses. The county has used the UR -22, Multi- family zoning district as its office district, which has resulted in a number of issues related to rezones and appropriate development standards. Areas that are currently developed in predominantly office uses would be re- designated to an "Office" comprehensive plan designation and zoning districts developed to implement this plan designation would include development standards to implement the policies of the comprehensive plan. Specific areas in the city include the Evergreen corridor north of Sprague Avenue; Mission east of Pines Road in the Valley Hospital /medical office area; near the intersection of Pines Road and Broadway; and other areas identified through the land use inventory process. 3. "Auto -Row" Overlay — The city has several new auto dealerships located along Sprague Avenue. The majority of these dealerships are located between Argonne Road and Thierman Road. Two dealerships are located just west of Dartmouth Road, near the U -City Mall. New car dealerships provide the city with substantial sales tax revenue on one hand, on the other hand auto dealerships can have a significant visual impact on a community and have somewhat unique needs related to development standards, such as signage and street frontage landscaping. This scenario recognizes these circumstances and designates Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 2 — Land Use Page 7 of 35 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan the areas identified above appropriately, and provides policy direction for the implementing development regulations. 4. Mixed -use — this scenario suggests reducing the strip commercial on Sprague Avenue by maintaining Community Commercial zoning only at major intersections such as Pines, Evergreen and Sullivan Roads. Areas in between these commercial "nodes" would be designated as Corridor Mixed -use or some other appropriate designation, which would encourage conversion of these vacant and /or dilapidated commercial areas into areas of office /employment, residential, light manufacturing and specialty retail. Industrial areas would not be significantly changed or altered under this or any other scenario. Permitted uses and development standards would be reviewed for appropriateness and changes proposed based on policy direction of the comprehensive plan. The majority of land in the City of Spokane Valley is dedicated to single family residential zoning and land use. The majority of the single family residential areas are designated Low Density Residential under the interim comprehensive plan. This plan designation allows for residential densities from one to six dwelling units per acre. Under this scenario, the existing single family residential zoning districts would be evaluated, and a series of single family districts with minimum lot sizes ranging from 7-6,000 to 10,000 square feet would be considered. Reducing overall lot sizes would enable the city to maintain its existing single family character, and minimize land needed for multi - family zoning to accommodate the city's 20 year population growth projection. 7. Areas previously platted in 1 +/- acre lots — There are areas in the City that were platted as approximately one acre lots. These areas would be rezoned to an R -1 zoning designation with the intent to preserve the original intent of the zoning for these areas. Moreover, these areas would be allowed to maintain a small number of livestock such as horses, cows, or llamas in keeping with the rural character of these neighborhoods. 2.3 Relationship to Other Comprehensive Plan Chapters The land use concept set forth in this chapter is consistent with all SVCP chapters. Internal consistency among the chapters of the SVCP translates into coordinated growth and an efficient use of limited resources. Below is a brief discussion of how the Land Use chapter relates to the other chapters of the SVCP. 2.3.1 Economic Development Spokane Valley's economy is disproportionately divided. Dr. Grant Forsyth, Assistant Professor of Economics at Eastern Washington University prepared a report based on year 2000 Census information for the Spokane Valley area. This report, "A Demographic and Economic Analysis for the City of Spokane Valley" indicates that there were nearly 3,000 employer firms employing approximately 43,305 people in the year 2000 with an average annual payroll per employee of approximately $29,000 (in 2000 dollars). Dependence on retail trade and service occupations stems primarily from the City's evolution into a regional shopping destination for eastern and southern Spokane County and counties in northern Idaho. Increased regional competition from other retail areas, such as Post Falls and Coeur d'Alene and the City of Spokane, may impact the City's ability to capture future retail dollars. To improve Spokane Valley's economic outlook, the economic development strategy is to promote a more diverse economy. A diversified economy would achieve a better balance between jobs and housing and support the City's desired quality of life. In conjunction with the Economic Development chapter, this Land Use chapter promotes the following: 1. A City Center composed of mid -rise office buildings, mixed -use retail, and housing. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 8 of 35 Chapter 2 — Land Use City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 2. Redevelopment and development of the Sprague Avenue /Appleway Boulevard corridor into an area of quality commercial and Mixed -use development. 3. Establishment of design standards. 4. Preservation of existing single family neighborhoods. The land use map designations support development necessary to achieve the above (see the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map 2.1). A complete discussion of economic development is set forth in the Economic Development chapter. 2.3.2 Capital Facilities Capital facilities provided by the City include: transportation and streets, parks and open space, and surface water management. The amount and availability of urban services and infrastructure influences the location and pace of future growth. The City is responsible for the construction and maintenance of parks and recreation facilities, streets and transportation improvements, and surface water facilities. Providing for future growth while maintaining existing improvements depends upon the community's willingness to pay for the construction and financing of new facilities and the maintenance of existing facilities. As outlined in the Capital Facilities Plan, new infrastructure and services may be financed by impact fees, grants, designated capital taxes (real estate excise tax, fuel tax, utility tax), money from the City's general fund or voter approved bonds. To capitalize on the City's available resources for urban services and infrastructure, this Land Use chapter recognizes that concentrating growth is far more cost effective than allowing continued urban sprawl. Concentrating growth also supports the enhancement of future transit improvements. Annexation of Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) to the City of Spokane Valley may be a logical progression to ensure centralized planning and prevention of urban sprawl. A major goal of the GMA is to reduce urban sprawl by encouraging development in urban areas where adequate public facilities exist. GMA further states that cities are the logical provider of urban government services. Prior to annexation, the City of Spokane Valley will consider the economic impacts of providing municipal services at a level consistent with other areas within the City. The City will not provide a lower level of service in areas being considered for annexation that were in existence in the proposed areas at the time immediately preceding the annexation process. The City will consider Potential Annexation Areas' JPAAsl' topography, land utilization, and population density when determining service levels. Water Availability — Potable water is provided to residents of Spokane Valley by thirteen water and irrigation districts. All drinking water used by residents in Spokane Valley is drawn from the Spokane Valley /Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer. Water Quality - Maintaining a clean source of water is vital to the health and livability of the City. Preserving water quality ensures a clean source of drinking water and continued health of the City's streams and lakes. Maintaining water quality is also important for maintaining the health of the aquifer that relies on surface water for recharge. Contamination of an aquifer by contaminated surface water can lead to serious health concerns and /or expensive treatment requirements. To address this concern and impacts of new development, the City has adopted a Stormwater Management Plan. The plan specifies actions to ensure water, quality including the development of detention /retention facilities to control rate and quality of water runoff. Furthermore, development of a wellhead protection program with the various water providers should provide guidelines to avoid possible contamination. Policies contained in the Natural Environment chapter provide direction for development near wellheads and in aquifer recharge areas. For a complete discussion of water resources and water purveyors in the City of Spokane Valley, refer to the Capital Facilities chapter. 2.3.3 Parks and Open Space Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 9 of 35 Chapter 2 — Land Use City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan One of the most important and valued elements of a high quality living and working environment is a parks and open space system. Providing parks and open spaces contributes to a reduction in environmental impacts such as noise and air pollution; increases the value of adjacent properties; provides areas for passive and active recreation; and helps preserve the natural beauty of the City. 2.3.4 Natural Environment Spokane Valley's natural beauty is apparent. Streams, wetlands, surrounding mountains and the Spokane River provide a scenic backdrop as well as a source for active and passive recreation for the citizens of Spokane Valley. The Land Use chapter seeks to protect Spokane Valley's unique natural resources through policies that support the preservation of these areas for future generations. The Natural Environment chapter also includes a discussion of critical areas as defined by GMA. For a complete discussion, please refer to the Natural Environment chapter. 2.3.5 Housing Housing is a basic human need and a major factor in the quality of life for individuals and families. An adequate supply of affordable, attractive, and functional housing is fundamental to achieving a sense of community. The central issue related to land use is supplying enough land to accommodate projected growth for a range of incomes and households. Presently, housing is provided primarily in single - family subdivisions. This plan sets forth strategies to increase housing options and choices. The Land Use chapter advocates changes to current development codes to increase flexibility in platting land and encourage housing as part of mixed -use developments in commercial areas. The latter provides an opportunity to locate housing closer to employment and shopping, and to create affordable housing. A complete discussion of housing can be found in the Housing chapter. 2.4 Poten+.,ll Annp-w,+:,,n Arp2igCurrent and Projected Population 2.4.1 Projected Growth Current population is estimated at the city, county and state level by the state's Office of Financial Management (OFM). The most recent OFM estimate for the current population of Spokane Valley (as of April 1, 2012) is 90,,4 550a&-4� 1, 2011-. -The City's estimated population capacity is the current OFM population estimate plus the potential population increase of 15,118 (see Table 2.1 Land Capacity Analysis�—. The City's estimated population capacity is 105,668. WSORg a ^,,,,,n„, IRdiRg r R)Wth Fato tho octimotorl :203_2 RCW 36.70A requires that at least every ten years the incorporated and unincorporated portions of the designated UGAs and the densities permitted therein, be reviewed and revised to ensure that the UGAs are sufficient to accommodate the urban growth that is projected by OFM to occur in the county for the subsequent 20 year period. On June 9, 2009, the Board of County Commissioners approved via Resolution 09 -0531 a population allocation of 18,746 for Spokane Valley for planning purposes. The City's Land Capacity Analysis estimated a population capacity of 415,118 leaving '�3, 228 people to be accommodated within the existing County UGAs. 2.4.2 Land Capacity Analysis The GMA requires a Land Capacity Analysis, or the theoretical holding capacity of the designated Urban Growth Areas, which by definition includes cities. By assigning the expected population growth to the results of the Land Capacity Analysis, the area required to accommodate the population growth is shaped. Countywide population forecasts are identified by the CWPPs, as one criterion for consideration in developing a regional methodology or countywide population allocation. The countywide growth target is based on the OFM growth management population forecast for Spokane County. The Land Quantity Analysis Methodology for Spokane County was developed through the efforts of the Land Quantity Technical Committee between March 1995 and October 1995. The Growth Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 10 of 35 Chapter 2 - Land Use City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Management Steering Committee of Elected Officials adopted that methodology on November 3, 1995. The adopted methodology is patterned after the Washington State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development's (CTED) land quantity inventory guidebook entitled Issues in Designating Urban Growth Areas Part 1- Providing Adequate Urban Area Land Supply. Use of that document was specified by the adopted Countywide Planning Policies (Policy Topic 1 (Urban Growth Areas Policy #3). However, the step -by -step CTED process was modified somewhat by the Land Quantity Technical Committee to reflect unique circumstances in Spokane County. The following steps of the regional methodology were followed by Spokane Valley in conducting the land capacity analysis: Identify lands that are potential candidates to accommodate future growth - vacant, partially -used and under - utilized land (in other words, subtract all parcels committed to other uses). Subtract all parcels that the community defines as not developable because of physical limitation. 3. Subtract lands that will be needed for other public purposes. 4. Subtract all parcels that the community determines are not suitable for development for social and economic reasons. 5. Subtract that percentage of land that the community assumes will not be available for development within the community plan's 20 -year time frame. 6. Build in a safety factor. 7. Determine total capacity. Spokane Valley prepared a land capacity analysis of the city based on the above regional methodology. The results of the land capacity analysis are contained in the table below: Table 2.1 Spokane Valley UGA Land Capacity Analysis (updated October 20102012) Vacant and Net Developable Potential New Potential Area Partially Used Acres Dwelling Units Population Land Capasltylncrease Spokane Valley X14 ^'9 ', ,4 93 (Incorporated Area) 3,378 1,265 6,998 15,118 2.4.3 Potential Annexation Areas As part of the implementation of the Growth Management Act (GMA), Spokane County established the Urban Growth Area (UGA) in 2001. Land inside that boundary is defined as urban, and must have urban densities, and land outside the UGA is to remain rural. UGAs are established by Spokane County, in cooperation with cities and towns, to accommodate projected population growth, both residential and commercial, throughout the County over the next twenty (20) years. These areas are under Spokane County's jurisdiction until they are annexed into an adjacent jurisdiction. The purpose of this section is to identify the unincorporated areas within the existing Spokane County UGA that are adjacent to the City of Spokane Valley, which would comprise potential annexation areas for the City. Map 2.2 indicates Potential aAnnexation aAreas (PAAs) for the City of Spokane Valley. Several UGAs are contiguous to Spokane Valley and would be logical areas for future annexation to the City of Spokane Valley. When a city annexes new areas, the new residents and businesses may be subject to the same taxes that are in place in the city at the time annexation takes place. If annexation occurs, the City would likely provide a consistent level of service throughout its new boundaries. Subsequently, the city would need to determine the cost of providing the current Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 11 of 35 Chapter 2 — Land Use City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan service levels to the annexation area. This process would include identifying public services and capital improvements that would need to be in place to serve the PAAs current and future land use pattern. 2.4.4 Development of Goals, Policies, and Actions for Annexation The Growth Management Act (GMA) requires counties to designate Urban Growth Area (UGAs) within which urban growth shall be encouraged RCW 36.70A.110 (1). UGAs are to include sufficient land to accommodate the twenty -year population growth projected for the county. The GMA imposes planning requirements to influence the ability of a city to annex UGAs. A city is required by GMA to adopt policies for land use, housing, capital facilities, utilities, and transportation within the city's UGA. In order to meet this requirement the City of Spokane Valley has developed policies and goals to provide policy guidance for annexation of territory within UGAs. Annexation will have financial impacts on the city; it may be positive or negative. The City may need to develop an annexation study to assess the financial impacts especially for larger annexations. The Capital Facilities chapter identifies current service providers within the Potential Annexation Areas analysis that may be needed prior to annexation. 2.5 Land Use Designations (PAAs) as a starting point for the detailed The land use designations in the SVCP recognize the relationships between broad patterns of land uses. The designations set forth locational criteria for each specific class of uses consistent with the long -term objectives of the SVCP. These designations provide the purpose and intent for specific zoning districts. The location of the comprehensive plan land use designations are shown on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map (Map 2.1). 2.5.1 Residential The demand for and development of single - family housing is expected to continue for the foreseeable future. Single- family development will occur as in -fill development of vacant or under developed lots scattered throughout existing neighborhoods, and as subdivisions on vacant tracts of land. To address future housing needs, the Land Use chapter encourages new techniques for developing single - family housing. Such techniques include clustering, planned presidential developments, lot size averaging, zero lot line development, accessory dwelling units and special needs housing. Low Density Residential The Low Density Residential (LDR) Comprehensive Plan designation addresses a range of single family residential densities from one dwelling unit per acre up to and including six dwelling units per acre. This designation would be implemented through a series of zoning designations as "{ described below. .,..: Implementing zoning for the LDR designation will include a series of zones allowing a range of minimum lot sizes. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Om `-OA City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Existing lot sizes and community character will be strongly considered when developing the City's zoning map. For example, areas such as Rotchford Acres and Ponderosa will likely require minimum lot sizes close to an acre in size. These large lot developments currently allow for horses and other large animals and have a distinct character that should be preserved to the greatest extent possible. The majority of the LDR designation will provide for densities ranging from four to six dwelling units per acre. Typical lot sizes will range from -76,000 to 10,000 square feet. Some areas designated as LDR still lack necessary urban services and infrastructure, mainly sanitary sewer facilities. Upon provision of urban services, such as water and sewer, and transit services, an increase in density in some areas may be warranted. However, the City will adopt strict criteria to evaluate zone changes to ensure that future development is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Medium Density Residential The Medium Density Residential designation represents an opportunity to provide a range of housing types to accommodate anticipated residential growth. The increase in population, decline in average family size, and increased cost of single - family homes have created increased demand for new housing types. The Land Use chapter encourages the development of housing types, such as duplexes, townhouses, and condominiums in existing multi - family areas and within mixed -use development in commercial areas. Multi- family uses, in large part, are in areas currently zoned for multiple - family development. Zoning will allow densities up to 12 dwelling units per acre in the Medium Density Residential designation. Opportunities for new development will occur through redevelopment and build -out of remaining parcels. Multi- family residential zones should be used as transitional zoning between higher intensity land uses such as commercial and office, to lower density single family neighborhoods. Additionally, Medium Density Residential areas should be located near services and high capacity transit facilities or transit routes. Residential design guidelines that address design and appearance of multiple - family developments should be considered. The primary goal of residential design guidelines is to develop multiple - family housing that is reflective of the community's character and appearance. High Density Residential This designation provides for existing multi - family residential development developed at a density in excess of 12 units per acre. Additionally, High Density Residential (HDR) designated areas are also located in areas near higher intensity development, such as a City Center. HDR provides housing opportunities for younger, lower income households in the City who may not yet be able to afford a home of their own. Moreover, this designation provides housing options for people looking to "downsize" from a single family dwelling on an individual lot, or for those known as "empty - nesters" whose children have moved out of the household and a large single family home is no longer needed. Generally, this designation is appropriate for land which is located adjacent to the arterial street system served by public transit, and is in close proximity to business and commercial centers. Offices are permitted in the High Density Residential areas in order to provide some of the service needs generated by high- intensity land uses and to allow conversion of existing single - family homes into office use. 2.5.2 Commercial Designations ! Existing commercial areas are auto - oriented and characterized by one - story low intensity development. In the future, these areas will become more intensively developed and pedestrian oriented, and in some designations, accommodate housing. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) L City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Transforming existing areas into places where people want to live, shop, and work requires changes. Commercial areas should contain street furniture, trees, pedestrian shelters, well marked crosswalks, and buildings oriented to and along the street to provide interest and allow easy pedestrian access. Regional Commercial The Regional Commercial designation encompasses two major retail areas of the City. It covers the "strip" retail areas along Sprague Avenue which includes the automobile dealerships located along the western end of the Sprague Avenue corridor and the "big box" retail area found in the Sullivan Road area from Sprague Avenue north to the Interstate 90 interchange, and includes the Valley Mall and Wal -Mart. Regional Commercial allows a large range of uses. A wide range of development types, appearance, ages, function, and scale can be found along Sprague Avenue. Older, single -story developments provide excellent opportunities for redevelopment. To create retail areas that are aesthetically and functionally attractive, revised development standards should be applied through Regional Commercial zoning, along with the adoption of Community Design Guidelines which address design quality, mixed -use, and the integration of auto, pedestrian, and transit circulation. Site design, modulation, and setback requirements are also addressed. Community Commercial The community commercial classification designates areas for retail, service and office establishments intended to serve several neighborhoods. Community Commercial areas should not be larger than 15 -17 acres in size and should be located as business clusters r rather than arterial strip commercial — - development. Community Commercial centers . may be designated through the adoption of the comprehensive plan, comprehensive plan amendments or through sub -area planning. Residences in conjunction with business and /or multifamily developments may be allowed with performance standards that ensure compatibility. In addition, light assembly or other unobtrusive uses not traditionally located in commercial zones may be allowed with appropriate performance standards to ensure compatibility with surrounding uses or zoning districts. Neighborhood Commercial The neighborhood commercial classification designates areas for small -scale neighborhoods serving retail and office uses. Neighborhood business areas should not be larger than two acres in size, and should be located as business clusters rather than arterial strip commercial developments. Neighborhood business centers may be designated through the adoption of the comprehensive plan, comprehensive plan amendments or through neighborhood plans. Auto -Row Overlay The City of Spokane Valley is home to several major new automobile dealerships. While these land uses provide a positive economic impact on the community, they can also have less positive impacts on the aesthetics of the community. Auto dealerships typically have vast areas of pavement to store new and used vehicles for sale. These land uses also have unique requirements for landscaping and signage. Unlike many commercial uses whose stock in trade is contained within a building, it is necessary for auto dealerships to have their vehicles clearly visible from the street. This makes traditional street side landscaping (consisting of low growing shrubs and bushes, and trees) not viable for these uses. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 14 of 35 Chapter 2 — Land Use City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan An overlay designation is being suggested rather than a zoning district because the negative affeetseffects on the non -auto dealer uses in the area will be minimized or eliminated. 2.5.3 City Center The intent of establishing a City Center in Spokane Valley is to create a higher density, mixed -use designation where office, retail, government uses, and residential uses are concentrated. The City Center will also be located at one of the major hubs of the region's high capacity transit (HCT) system. The City Center encourages higher intensity land uses. Traditional city centers are places where diverse office, retail, and government uses are concentrated, as well as cultural and civic facilities, community services and housing. Nationally, many cities are advocating mixed -use development in city center core areas for a number of reasons, including: • Providing new housing, increasing the range of housing choices, and reducing dependency on the automobile by bringing work places and residences into close proximity; • Providing retail and service needs in close proximity to residential and employment centers; Improving feasibility of a development project. The proximity of urban services makes housing projects more desirable and a nearby source of consumers help make a commercial project more viable. Residents choose to live in higher density housing for a variety of reasons. First, higher density housing is more affordable than traditional single family housing. Second, the convenience and proximity to work, needed services and cultural activities is very desirable for many people. Finally, many people find that they do not need a large, single family detached house. Given their lifestyle, they appreciate the low maintenance and security of higher density living. There is a mutually supportive relationship between higher density residential uses and commercial and retail activities. The presence of housing the core area also activates the streets in the city center, day and night. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) 7 W-7 W-7—� now ,,,t �d`� ��aY� _ lilt -':• �1! Page 15 of 35 Chapter 2 — Land Use Concentrating growth in a specific area also supports investment in public infrastructure including the regional HCT system. Existing low density development does not generate sufficient levels of demand to optimize "I-, mobility. The City Center emphasizes unfriendly to the use of automobiles. City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan n . LKI- 1 ['� dFr�rlrfr,s the return on investment in transit. Promoting higher density uses within walking distance of transit facilities will improve the viability of this significant infrastructure investment. Moreover, concentrating the highest density of development in the City Center, where a significant number of jobs and residences will be within walking distance of a transit station, helps reduce the dependency on the automobile and improves pedestrian pedestrian, bicycle, and transit mobility but will not be The City Center area will also be the central gathering place for the community — a place where the whole community can congregate and celebrate. Accordingly, the City Center should include an outdoor square, park, or commons with amenities such as fountains, sculptures, and unique landscaping. Other civic amenities or buildings including city hall or a performing arts center could be grouped around the core area square or park. The City currently holds an annual Christmas Tree Lighting Ceremony in the area designated as the City Center. Additional such events throughout the year will enhance the feeling of community in Spokane Valley. An appropriate street network is a critical component of the City Center. The current network of collector streets and arterials, the disjointed grid, and large block sizes contribute to a lack of identity in the City. The solution is not necessarily to construct wider streets. Streets become less efficient as the number of lanes increases. Building new streets versus widening existing streets can be more cost effective, yields greater capacity, and will have a more positive impact on the City Center. Automobiles are likely to continue as a dominant mode of transportation for the foreseeable future. A comprehensive network of streets must be developed to distribute this traffic and create more driving choices. To the extent possible, the City should connect streets and construct new streets to form a tighter grid system within the City Center, especially in the core area, by negotiating new public rights -of -way and building new streets. This "interconnectivity" serves to shorten and disperse trips, and consequently reduce travel on existing congested arterials. Pedestrian and bicycle mobility is a vital part of the future City Center transportation system. Improvements for pedestrians and bicyclists should support increases in transit services and promote the development of the City Center. As the street system is developed to better accommodate the needs of pedestrians and bicyclists, a network of facilities for people on foot and bikes should be established. Reducing the size of the street grid, improving auto circulation and creating pedestrian linkages through larger parcels is critical to establish walking patterns that reduce dependency on the auto. As individual sites are designed and developed to be more pedestrian friendly and improved Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 16 of 35 Chapter 2 — Land Use City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan pedestrian linkages are provided, the pedestrian system will handle an increasing share of trips. Special street design standards should be developed for the City Center. Special standards for extra -wide sidewalks (12 to 20 feet in width), pedestrian -scale street lighting, and additional amenities including benches, trash receptacles, and landscaped corner treatments should be included. Transforming the existing commercial core area into the proposed City Center is an ambitious task. It requires a significant transformation from a low- density, automobile oriented, largely retail area, to a higher intensity, more pedestrian oriented Mixed -use area. The City Center section of the Plan acknowledges that the City Center will take some time to develop. The City can facilitate these changes through a series of small steps taken over time. This is especially true if the steps are consistent with emerging economic, social and demographic trends. As is the intent of this Plan, the phasing scenario presented here accounts for the timing of market projections and j future actions. As noted above, the implementation strategy is keyed to projected trends and regional planning goals. Its form and character, as envisioned in this Plan, are dramatically different from • `^"'E """ %"" `'^"C ° anything that now exists in the i- „ proposed City Center area. It will im � -o G4R6 l• u•QA r2 take some time for the development community to redirect its energy and investments to produce development that responds to the direction of the Plan. The demand for more intense development opportunities in the City Center is not forecasted within the next few years. In the meantime, the City should discourage continued low -scale investment in this area since new development will take several years to be amortized, and will delay the accomplishment of preferred development. As regulations are applied to modest renovations, it should be possible to gain some basic improvements. However, the City should not expect full implementation of the vision for the City Center until major property owners in the area are ready to install long -term, major development projects. The figures (computer generated as part of the TOD Study) at the beginning of this section first show the existing conditions of the City Center; the second figure illustrating potential redevelopment of the area over time. The pictures are taken from approximately Farr Road looking east toward the U -City Mall area. The photos do not necessarily indicate specific recommendations for the area, but are merely an illustration of how a viable City Center could evolve through several coordinated, incremental steps taken over time. 2.5.4 Office Designation Spokane Valley has areas of quality office development. Several developments within the Argonne /Mullan Couplet, Pines Road, and Evergreen Road corridors embody good design and are representative of desired future office development. Office development will provide new job opportunities within the community. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) w 1�* �w Page 17 of 35 Chapter 2 — Land Use City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan This comprehensive plan designation is intended primarily for office development with limited retail or commercial uses. Retail and commercial uses are limited to those that are clearly subordinate to the primary office use, or the retail function primarily serves the office uses in close proximity to the retail or commercial use. Primary uses which are representative of this comprehensive plan category, include medical and dental facilities, education services, insurance, real s ■■ ■� r� estate, financial institutions, design + r firms, and legal services. /, ■■ n Areas designated as Office can serve a variety of functions. They can stand alone as major employment centers. They can also act as buffers or transition areas between higher intensity land uses and lower intensity land uses. For example, Office areas can provide a transition between industrial or commercial uses and residential areas. Office uses work well for this because they tend to generate less traffic and noise, operate shorter hours and are often smaller in scale then industrial or commercial areas. The Office comprehensive plan designation will be implemented through a series of office zoning districts. 2.5.5 Mixed -use The concept of "Mixed -use" has been around for centuries. Prior to the advent of the automobile and the proliferation of the road and highway system, Mixed -use was a predominant urban form. The "rediscovery' of this development type may be due in part to the negative impacts of sprawl, which have resulted in traffic congestion, decline in air quality, and inefficient use of resources and infrastructure. Mixed -use development has several potential benefits: • Land and infrastructure resources are used more efficiently; • Pedestrian - friendly neighborhoods; • Jobs are located near housing; • Opportunities to revitalize commercial corridors; • Opportunities for infill residential development (primarily in corridors); • Encourage new housing and innovative retail that is less auto dependent; and • Compatibility with existing transit access along local corridors. Mixed -use may be either "horizontal Mixed -use" or "vertical Mixed - use." Horizontal Mixed -use means that residential, commercial, office and other uses are adjacent to each other typically as part of an overall master plan for a site. However, not all projects within a "Mixed -use" designated area must be Mixed -use to achieve the goals of this plan. For example, a new residential -only project that is appropriately designed and located adjacent to an older existing commercial building may help stimulate renovation and reuse. This would be a more likely scenario in the Corridor Mixed -use area rather than the Mixed -use area. Vertical Mixed -use means that residential and nonresidential uses are stacked over each other. Typically, residential uses are placed over ground level retail, offices and /or restaurant uses. This development type would be more likely to occur in the City Center or in the areas designated as Mixed -use. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 18 of 35 Chapter 2 — Land Use City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Corridor Mixed -Use Corridor Mixed -use is intended to enhance travel options, encourage development of locally serving commercial uses, multi - family apartments, lodging and offices along major transportation corridors identified on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map (Map 2.1). Corridor Mixed -use recognizes the historical low- intensity, auto - dependent development pattern, and focuses on a pedestrian orientation with an emphasis on aesthetics and design. The Corridor Mixed -use designation is primarily used along Sprague Avenue in order to space the areas designated commercial. Mixed -Use Center The Mixed -use Center designation would allow for two or more different land uses within developments under this designation. As described above, Mixed -use developments can be either vertical or horizontally mixed, and would include employment uses such as office, retail and /or lodging along with higher density residential uses, and in some cases community or cultural facilities. Mixed -use developments in this designation are characterized by differing land uses which are developed pursuant to a coherent, approved plan of development. Compatibility between uses is achieved through design which integrates certain physical and functional features such as transportation systems, pedestrian ways, open areas or court yards, and common focal points or amenities. 2.5.6 Industrial Designations Providing for industrial land is important for the economic health of Spokane Valley. Industrial businesses help drive the local economy and create an economic multiplier effect throughout the region. Providing an adequate supply of usable land with minimal environmental constraints and infrastructure in place helps ensure that Spokane Valley will be an attractive place for industrial businesses to locate and prosper. (See Chapter 7, Economic Development, for additional policies that encourage recruitment and retention of industrial business.). Heavy Industry Heavy industry is characterized by intense industrial activities which include, but are not limited to, manufacturing, processing, fabrication, assembly /disassembly, freight - handling and similar operations. Heavy industry may have significant noise, odor or aesthetic impacts to surrounding areas. Commercial, residential and most recreational uses should not be allowed in areas designated for heavy industry, except for small -scale ancillary uses serving the industrial area. The conversion of designated industrial lands to other uses should be limited. Limiting incompatible uses ensures a competitive advantage in business recruitment by providing adequate industrial land supply, reducing land use conflicts and preventing inflation of land prices. Moreover, allowing a wide variety of commercial, retail and other uses in the Industrial areas would be in conflict with other portions of this Plan related to concentrating major commercial growth in nodes at the intersection of major streets. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 19 of 35 _ rMAo Chapter 2 — Land Use City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Light Industry The Light Industry designation is a planned industrial area with special emphasis and attention given to aesthetics, landscaping, and internal and community compatibility. Uses may include high technology and other low- impact industries. Light Industry areas may incorporate office and commercial uses as ancillary uses within an overall plan for the industrial area. Non - industrial uses should be limited and in the majority of cases be associated with permitted industrial uses. The Light Industry category may serve as a transitional category between heavy industrial areas and other less intensive land use categories. The category may also serve as a visual buffer for heavy industrial areas adjacent to aesthetic corridors. 2.5.7 Parks/ Open Space The Parks and Open Space designation is intended to protect parks, open space, and other natural physical assets of the community. 2.6 Development Review Process The Land Use chapter provides the policy foundation for implementing zoning and development regulations. In developing policy concerning future land use regulations, or revisions to existing regulations, every effort has been made to instill certainty and efficiency in the development process. State legislation has focused on developing streamlined and timely permit processing. Through the goals and policies of this Plan, the City will continue to strive to provide an efficient and timely review system. 2.7 Urban Design and Form In addition to guiding development, the Land Use chapter also guides the quality and character of the City's future development pattern through goals and policies related to the form, function, and appearance of the built environment. These priorities and implementation strategies, related to quality development, serve and will continue to serve as a basis from which to develop appropriate implementation measures. The design of our urban environment has a significant effect on community identity. Well designed communities contribute to a healthful, safe and sustainable environment that offers a variety of opportunities for housing and employment. An attractive and well planned community is invaluable when recruiting new business and industry to an area. Some of the concepts considered include: Community appearance, including signs and placement of utilities; • Neighborhood considerations in the review of development projects; • Integration and linking of neighborhoods including bicycle and pedestrian facilities; • The effect of traffic patterns and parking on neighborhood character; • Encouragement of high quality development through the appropriate use of planned unit developments; and • Consideration for public art. 2.7.1 Aesthetic Corridors Aesthetic corridors are intended to protect the visual appeal of Spokane Valley along major transportation routes entering and exiting the city. Aesthetic corridors provide special design standards for aesthetics along major transportation routes to help create a quality image of Spokane Valley. Another component of aesthetic corridors is the "gateways" into the city. There are several entrances into the City of Spokane Valley along major transportation corridors, including Sprague Avenue, Trent Avenue, State Route 27 and a number of interchanges on Interstate 90. Design elements and landscaping treatments should denote a sense of arrival into the City, a neighborhood or special area such as the city center. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 20 of 35 Chapter 2 — Land Use City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 2.7.2 Planned Unit Developments Building flexibility into the subdivision process is important to allow for new concepts and creative site design. Planned residential developments (PRDs) provide the city a tool for allowing flexibility, while ensuring a design meets overall health and safety standards, and is consistent with neighborhood character. PRDs allow for deviations from the typical zoning standards in exchange for designs that protect the environment, provide usable open space, and exhibit exceptional quality and design. 2.8 Historical and Cultural Resources 2.8.1 Background In many ways, Spokane Valley's historic and cultural resources are similar to our rich natural resources. Like wetlands, rivers, lakes, streams and other natural resources, historic properties are a finite and endangered resource. Also like our natural resources, once an historic or archaeological property is destroyed, it is lost forever. Cultural resources such as historic buildings, monuments of historic events and archaeological sites are statements of Spokane Valley's identity. People especially value our authentic, homegrown cultural resources that set us apart from other areas of the state. Spokane Valley is the location of several "Firsts" to occur in the Spokane Region. The first permanent settler in the Spokane area was Antoine Plante, a retired French - Canadian trapper. Plante built a cabin near the Spokane River in 1849, from which he operated a small Hudson's Bay Company trading post. Plante also constructed and operated the first ferry on the Spokane River. Other settlers began arriving in this area between 1865 and 1882. "Firsts" to occur in Spokane Valley include the first settler in 1849, first business and ferry in 1850, the first store and bridge in 1862, the first house in 1866 and the first post office in 1867. All of these "firsts" occurred before the arrival in 1873 of James Glover who was considered the "Father of Spokane." A large part of Spokane Valley's identity is derived from its heritage. From the Native Americans who first established trading centers to the continuing waves of newcomers from around the world, all have left their mark. Cultural resources include historic structures and landscapes engineered and built by man: a. Historic buildings - houses, barns, commercial buildings, churches, schools b. Historic structures - bridges, dams, stone fences. c. Historic districts - a grouping of buildings with related historic character. d. Historic objects - statues, monuments, sculpture. e. Landscapes — gardens, parks, urban and rural. Cultural resources include properties that were held in spiritual or ceremonial honor or by a cultural group or tribe. Cultural resources include properties which may no longer show evidence of man -made structures, but retain an historical association with an event or period. Archaeology sites include such areas as battlefields, campsites, cemeteries, burial sites, rock carvings, pictographs, trails, village sites, fishing sites, trading sites, religious and ceremonial sites.h ' 2.8.2 Cultural and Historical Resource Issues Documenting Cultural Resources - Many historic homes, farms and sites exemplify the history and culture of the Spokane Valley area, but proportionally few have ' been written in historic register nominations. Designation requires owner consent, does not pose undue restrictions to+` the property owner, and can be a planning tool for government Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 21 of 35 Chapter 2 — Land Use City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan by identifying significant properties. Archaeological Sites and Security State laws require the protection of archaeological sites on both public and private land by directing that the locations of sites be kept confidential within the assigned office because archaeological sites are highly susceptible to "treasure hunters and grave robbers." Existing lists need to be checked to confirm that evidence of the site /building remains, and a better means to identify and preserve evidence of significant archaeological sites is needed. Cultural resources are deemed important when they are over 50 years old, so identification and evaluation of them is a constant, ongoing process. Moreover, cultural resources are perceived as less important than other immediate, short -term City programs; therefore, funding and support for the preservation program is provided on an annual rather than an ongoing basis. 2.8.3 Spokane Valley Historic and Cultural Resources The Spokane Valley developed as irrigated agricultural tracts in five and ten -acre lots. The apple orchards of Otis Orchards were supported by warehouses, packing plants, and box manufacturers. The apple industry which thrived in the early century was destroyed by killing frost of the 1950s. Newman Lake supplied the water that irrigated these orchards via the Spokane Canal Company. The flow control gate at Newman Lake (a great fishing spot) remains as a ruin with its story only in fading memory. Open canal ditches, concrete flues, cultivated fields and apple orchards were part of growing up in the valley until the late 1950s. A canal ran behind Otis Orchards High School, neither of which now exists. The picture on page 25 shows an Otis Orchards irrigation canal. The Opportunity Township Hall was designed by Opportunity resident and noted Spokane architect C. Harvey Smith 4, "rte °f 0 and constructed in 1912 by Opportunity builder and businessman C.E. Johnson. Built as Opportunity's government seat, the Opportunity Township Hall also served as the area's community hall and a meeting place for various philanthropic and other organizations including the Opportunity Moose Lodge, Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, church groups, dance studios, and wedding parties. The Opportunity Township Hall is significant as a rare local example of Spanish- Mediterranean style architecture and for its association with the early settlement and development of the Spokane Valley and the town of Opportunity. 2.9 The Land Use /Transportation Connection 2.9.1 Street Connectivity Street design can have a significant impact on community development. It is important that neighborhoods be connected is such a manner that cars, bicycles and pedestrians can pass with ease from one neighborhood to an adjacent neighborhood via collectors and arterials. Such a pattern promotes a sense of community. All new developments should give special consideration to emergency access routes. 2.9.2 Traffic Calming Traffic calming can be defined as measures that physically alter the operational characteristics of the roadway in an attempt to slow down traffic and reduce the negative effects of the automobile. The theory behind traffic calming is that roads should be multiuse spaces encouraging social links Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 22 of 35 Chapter 2 — Land Use City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan within a community and the harmonious interaction of various modes of travel (i.e., walking, cycling, auto, transit). 2.10 Citizen Participation The City of Spokane Valley adopted a Public Participation Program for the preparation of the comprehensive plan. This program identified actions the city would take to meet the GMA requirements of "early and continuous" public participation in the development of the city's plan. Two of the public participation techniques identified in the Public Participation Program is citizen survey and a series of public meetings hosted by the city's planning commission. In the spring of 2004, the City hired Clearwater Research to conduct a statistically valid survey of Spokane Valley residents on a number of issues. Clearwater Research conducted a telephone survey with a random sample of 400 Spokane Valley adults. Survey data was collected from March 18 to April 7, 2004. The majority of respondents (83 %) indicated they thought Spokane Valley was headed in the right direction. However, respondents did identify a number of important issues facing Spokane Valley. Concerns about the economy and planning related matters were among the top issues respondents identified as facing the City. 2.10.1 City Center /Community Identity City Center. Sixty -one percent of respondents indicated that having a recognizable downtown or city center was important to the future of Spokane Valley (figure right). Female respondents, respondents at lower income levels, and respondents residing in one or two person households were most likely to report that having a recognizable downtown was important to the future of Spokane Valley. There was strong support among respondents for spending public money to create a city center. Seventy -four percent of respondents either somewhat or strongly supported Spokane Valley officials using public money to develop a city center. Only two percent strongly opposed the use of public money to create a city center. Most Ideal Location for a City Center Over half of the respondents (52 %) felt the University City area would be the most ideal Spokane Valley 5% 12 ° 15% ■ n =233 1 s °% ° 52 ° Other Everygreen and Sprague Pines and Sprague Mirabeau Point University City area 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% location for a city center. Other areas considered appropriate for the City Center included Mirabeau Point Pines and Sprague and Evergreen and Sprague. Importance of Spokane Valley Having Community Identity Community Identity. Only 26% of respondents thought Spokane Valley had a distinct identity or something that made it unique. Interestingly, almost the same percentage of respondents who said Spokane Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) 100% $0 ■ n =396 °I° 60% 40% 20% 21% 22% 15% o � 0% Strongly Somewhat Neutral Somewhat Strongly oppose oppose support support Page 23 of 35 Chapter 2 —Land Use City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Valley does not have a community identity (74 %), indicated that having a community identity was important to the future of Spokane Valley (76 %). While many respondents (47 %) felt community identity could be developed through social changes, others believed physical changes (28 %) or a combination of both physical and social changes (25 %) were the best means for accomplishing the development of community identity. 2.10.2 Community Aesthetics The typical pattern of development along the major streets of Spokane Valley did not appear to be of great concern to respondents. Just 22% expressed dissatisfaction with the current type of development along major streets. Further underscoring the general lack of concern about the typical pattern of development along major streets, only 23% of respondents indicated adding street trees and landscaping to major streets should be a high priority for City officials. Lower income respondents were more apt than higher income respondents to report that making streets pedestrian - friendly should be a high priority for City officials. Support /Opposition to Development of Small Commercial Centers Close to Residential Neighborhoods Respondents' opinions (graph right) regarding the development of small commercial centers close to residential neighborhoods, were also sharply divided. Just under half of the respondents (46 %) were supportive of developing small commercial centers close to residential neighborhoods. Priority Level: Stronger Controls on Signs and Billboards in Spokane Valley Opinions regarding the priority City officials should place on stronger sign and billboard controls were very mixed. However, 67% of respondents indicated that Spokane Valley officials should place a medium or high priority on stronger sign and billboard control and as such, it is probable that the majority of residents would be supportive of stronger billboard control and sign regulations. 2.10.3 Results of "Unscientific" Survey During the community meetings held on the comprehensive plan, city staff made available the survey questions contained in the city's community survey. Meeting attendees were asked to complete the survey and either return it before the end of the meeting, or to complete the survey at home and mail it to the city. In many cases the responses to the questions were similar to the responses of the formal survey conducted by Clearwater Research. These question numbers are right of the survey itself. The following are the results of the "unscientific" survey: Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 24 of 35 Chapter 2 — Land Use 100% n =396 80% 60% 41% 35% 40% 10 20% o o 0% E��979 Very Somewhat Neutral Somewhat Very unimportant unimportant important important 11 1 Priority Level: Stronger Controls on Signs and Billboards in Spokane Valley Opinions regarding the priority City officials should place on stronger sign and billboard controls were very mixed. However, 67% of respondents indicated that Spokane Valley officials should place a medium or high priority on stronger sign and billboard control and as such, it is probable that the majority of residents would be supportive of stronger billboard control and sign regulations. 2.10.3 Results of "Unscientific" Survey During the community meetings held on the comprehensive plan, city staff made available the survey questions contained in the city's community survey. Meeting attendees were asked to complete the survey and either return it before the end of the meeting, or to complete the survey at home and mail it to the city. In many cases the responses to the questions were similar to the responses of the formal survey conducted by Clearwater Research. These question numbers are right of the survey itself. The following are the results of the "unscientific" survey: Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 24 of 35 Chapter 2 — Land Use How important to the future of Spokane Valley is having an area of the City that is recognized as the "downtown "? Would you say...? The responses to this question are very similar to those received during the formal community survey. The results above reflect that out of the total responses of 177 on this issue, 102 or nearly 58 percent felt that Spokane Valley having an identifiable downtown or city center was either somewhat important or very important. This is compared to 40 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 100% F■ n =177Ti ■ n =170 80% 80% 60% 33% 40% 39% 34% 26% ° 18 /° 19% 40% 20% 4% 20% 5% 1 0% Very Somewhat Neither Somewhat Very important important important unimportant unimportant I --4 nor Somewhat Neither Somewhat Very unimportant important important nor unimportant responses or 229/o indicating that an identifiable city center was either somewhat or very unimportant. If you feel a developing a "downtown" is important, which of the following areas of Spokane Valley would be the most ideal location for a downtown? Those respondents who indicated that having an identifiable city center overwhelming (73 %) felt that the University City area was the most appropriate location for establishing a city center for Spokane Valley. In your opinion, does Spokane Valley have an identity or something that makes it unique? The result of this survey question is somewhat different from the results of the formal community survey. In the formal survey only 26% of the respondents felt that the City of Spokane Valley has an identity or something that makes it unique. The results in the graph at the right indicate that a majority of those surveyed at the community meetings (52 %) felt there was something unique about Spokane Valley. 100% ■ n =170 80% 60% 39% 34% 40% 13% 20% 5% 1 9% M 0% -::1 1 1 ---IlllllllL— I --4 Very Somewhat Neither Somewhat Very important important important nor unimportant unimportant unimportant Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 25 of 35 Chapter 2 – Land Use City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan How important to the future of Spokane Valley is having a "community identity? Would you say...? When asked how important to the future of Spokane Valley is having a distinct community identity, an overwhelming majority of the respondents (73 %) felt it is either somewhat important or very important that Spokane Valley have a distinct identity. This is consistent with 100% ■ n =155 the results of the formal community 80% survey where 76% of respondents felt it is important for the city to have a 60% 52% 48% community identity. — Would development of a "community identity" best be accomplished through physical changes, such as the development of a city center or the building of gateways at the major points of entry into the city, or through social changes, such as more community events like Valleyfest? When asked what types of changes would be needed to develop a community identity, a majority (57 %) felt that both social and physical changes would be necessary to accomplish developing an identity for the city. This is somewhat different than the formal survey where only 26% of the roe ondents felt that both h sical and 100% ■ n =150 80 57% 60 40 28% 20% 15% 0% Physical Changes Social Changes Both Changes Equally Important F F social changes were equally important to develop the city's identity. Do you consider adding street trees and landscaping to major streets in Spokane Valley a high, medium, or low priority for city officials? In terms of community aesthetics, a majority of the respondents (59 %) felt that adding street trees and landscaping to the major streets in the city should be either a medium or high priority for city officials. This result was identical to the result of the city's formal community survey where 59% of respondents felt this should be either a medium or high priority for the city. 2.11 Goals and Policies Residential Goals & Policies Goal LUG -1 Preserve and protect the character of Spokane Valley's residential neighborhoods. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 26 of 35 Chapter 2 — Land Use City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Policies LUP -1.1 Maintain and protect the character of existing and future residential neighborhoods through the development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations and joint planning. LUP -1.2 Protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent non - residential uses and /or higher intensity uses through the development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations and joint planning. LUP -1.3 Review and revise as necessary, existing land use regulations to provide for innovation and flexibility in the design of new residential developments, accessory dwelling units and in -fill development. LUP -1.4 Encourage the development of transportation routes and facilities to serve residential neighborhoods. Special attention should be given to pedestrian circulation. LUP -1.5 Encourage the development of parks and the dedication of open space in and adjacent to residential areas. Open space dedication shall be proportionate to the size of the development. LUP -1.6 Preserve site characteristics that enhance residential development (trees, bodies of water, vistas, and similar features) using site planning techniques such as clustering, planned unit developments, transfer of development rights and lot size averaging. LUP -1.7 Allow zone changes within the Low Density Residential category only when specific criteria are met. Criteria may include: • Substantial changes within zone change area. • Clear mapping errors. • Adequate facilities and services (e.g. sewer, water capacity). • Consistency with densities in the vicinity of the zone change. LUP -1.8 Development agreements in conjunction with comprehensive plan amendments may be used where the project is larger in scope and has potentially larger impacts than normal, or where the city council may desire to place certain restrictions on proposal. LUP -1.9 Development agreements in conjunction with comprehensive plan amendments shall not be used to waive requirements associated with a proposed use. LUP -1.10 Office uses are allowed in the High Density Residential (HDR) category. Office uses must conform to all the development standards established for high density multifamily development. Goal LUG -2 Encourage a wide range of housing types and densities commensurate with the community's needs and preferences. Policies LUP -2.1 Allow and encourage a variety of housing types in designated Mixed -use areas, especially in the City Center area. LUP -2.2 Use design and performance standards for residential developments to achieve integration in commercial and Mixed -use developments. Performance standards should focus on scale, appearance, and compatibility. Encourage variations in facades and rooflines to add character and interest to multi - family developments. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 2 — Land Use Page 27 of 35 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan LUP -2.3 Encourage the development of transportation routes and facilities to serve residential neighborhoods. Special attention should be given to walking, biking and transit uses. LUP -2.4 Residential development should be designed to provide privacy and common open space. Open space areas shall be proportionate to the size of the residential development. LUP -2.5 Consider special development techniques (e.g., zero lot lines, lot size averaging, and planned unit developments) in single - family areas, provided they result in residential development consistent with the quality and character of existing neighborhoods. LUP -2.7 Consider and possibly implement programs facilitating purchase or retention of existing open space lands, such as transfer of development rights (TDR) or purchase of development rights (PDR). Commercial Goals & Policies Goal LUG -3 Transform various commercial business areas into vital, attractive, easily accessible mixed use areas that appeal to investors, consumers and residents and enhance the community image and economic vitality. Policies LUP -3.1 Encourage transformation of Sprague Avenue Regional/ Community Commercial corridor into a quality mixed -use retail area. Retail development along the corridor, exclusive of the City Center, should be concentrated at arterial intersections and designed to integrate auto, pedestrian, and transit circulation. Integration of public amenities and open space into retail and office development should also be encouraged. LUP -3.2 Encourage large bulk retailers to locate in the designated Regional Commercial nodes around arterial intersections. LUP -3.3 Development agreements in conjunction with comprehensive plan amendments may be used to ensure compatibility between non - residential developments and residential zones by regulating height, scale, setbacks, and buffers. Goal LUG -4 Provide neighborhood and community scale retail centers for the City's neighborhoods. Policies LUP -4.1 Integrate retail developments into surrounding residential areas with attention to quality design and function. LUP -4.2 Encourage pedestrian and bicycle access to neighborhood shopping and services. LUP -4.3 Encourage retail and personal services to group together within planned centers to allow for ease of pedestrian movement. LUP -4.4 Encourage Mixed -use residential and commercial and office development in Neighborhood Commercial designations where compatibility with nearby uses can be demonstrated. LUP -4.5 Ensure compatibility between mixed -use developments and residential areas by regulating height, scale, setbacks, and buffers. LUP -4.6 Develop community design guidelines to promote common open space, public art, and plazas in commercial and office developments. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 2 — Land Use Page 28 of 35 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan LUP -4.7 Develop design guidelines that encourage quality design and pedestrian and vehicle circulation in commercial, office and Mixed -use developments. LUP -4.8 Develop design guidelines to encourage commercial development to locate along the street edge (where deemed appropriate) to provide pedestrian street access. LUP -4.9 Identify and designate streets where on- street parking can be safely provided without unduly slowing traffic flow or jeopardizing traffic safety. LUP -4.10 May provide incentives to encourage developers to include housing in mixed -use projects. Goal LUG -5 Identify appropriate locations for the Auto Row Overlay designation. Policies LUP -5.1 Identify other appropriate automobile related uses within the Auto Row Overlay designation that are complementary to automobile dealerships. LUP -5.2 Develop appropriate development standards for permitted uses within the Auto Row Overlay designated area. City Center Goal LUG -6 Create an identifiable City Center that serves as the social, cultural, and economic focus of the City of Spokane Valley. Policies LUP -6.1 Define a City Center with distinct boundaries, unique building types, and special features. LUP -6.2 Strengthen existing connections of the City Center area to the region's high capacity transit system. LUP -6.3 Focus on improving the existing character and image of the City Center area through appropriate development regulations and design standards. LUP -6.4 Develop land use regulations that allow higher intensity development in the City Center including, but not limited to, taller buildings, increased floor area ratios (FAR) and permitted uses. LUP -6.5 Coordinate with urban service providers to ensure sufficient capacity is available for anticipated development. LUP -6.6 Allow for a variety of uses and mixed -use development within buildings or complexes. Ensure that mixed -use development complements and enhances the character of the surrounding residential and commercial area. LUP -6.7 The City should always consider City Center sites regarding potential civic and cultural uses the City develops, such as a City Hall. LUP -6.8 Provide incentives to attract cultural and civic uses to the City Center over which the City does not have direct control, such as libraries or recreation facilities. LUP -6.9 Develop land use regulations that encourage higher density residential uses on the periphery of the City Center area in close proximity to high capacity transit. High density housing should be accompanied by residentially oriented retail and service uses. LUP -6.10 Provide amenities such as community services, parks and public spaces to meet the residential needs in the City Center. LUP -6.11 Provide an effective transition between the periphery of the City Center and nearby lower density residential development. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 2 — Land Use Page 29 of 35 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Goal LUG -7 Provide a balanced transportation network that accommodates public transportation, high occupancy vehicles, pedestrians, bicyclists, automobiles and integrated parking. Policies LUP -7.1 Improve traffic circulation around and through the City Center by extending the street network and creating smaller blocks. LUP -7.2 Encourage pedestrian and bicycle circulation by providing public sidewalks, street trees, street furniture and other amenities. LUP -7.3 Require clear and safe pedestrian paths to enhance the pedestrian network. LUP -7.4 Connect the main entry of buildings to public sidewalks by an identifiable walkway. LUP -7.5 Allow for on- street parking on the internal City Center street network. LUP -7.6 Encourage transit use by improving pedestrian and bicycle linkages to the existing and future transit system. Office Goals & Policies Goal LUG -8 Create appropriate development standards for Office designated areas. Policies LUP -8.1 Allow commercial, residential and recreational uses in conjunction with permitted uses in Office designated areas. LUP -8.2 Integrate sidewalks, bike lanes, landscaping, and area lighting in office areas to provide a safe and attractive working environment. LUP -8.3 Allow office uses in high density residential zones to provide some of the service needs generated from multifamily development. Mixed -use Goals & Policies Goal LUG -9 Encourage the development of Mixed -use areas that foster community identity and are designed to support pedestrian, bicycle and regional transit. Policies LUP -9.1 The characteristics of a Mixed -use area should include: • Housing and employment densities to support regional transit service; • Public transit connections; • Safe, attractive transit stops and pedestrian and bicycle ways; • Buildings that front on wide sidewalks with attractive landscaping, benches and frequent bus stops; • Multi -story buildings oriented to the street rather than parking lots; and • Parking space located behind or to the side of buildings or in parking structures. LUP -9.2 The mix of land uses allowed in either the Corridor Mixed -use or Mixed -use Center designation should include: Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 30 of 35 Chapter 2 — Land Use City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan • A variety of housing types including apartments, condominiums, town houses, two - family and single family dwellings on small lots; • A full range of retail goods and services including grocery stores, theaters /entertainment, restaurants, personal services and specialty shops; • Public /quasi - public uses and /or open space; • Professional Office and other employment oriented uses; and • Commercial uses that require large land areas but have low employment density and are auto - dependant, such as lumber yards, plant nurseries, warehouses, and auto dealerships, should be prohibited from either Mixed - use category. Industrial Goals & Policies Goal LUG -10 Provide for the development of well - planned industrial areas and ensure the long -term holding of appropriate land in parcel sizes adequate to allow for future development as industrial uses. Policies LUP -10.1 Plan capital facility expenditures to assist the development of lands designated for industrial uses. LUP -10.2 Encourage a diverse array of industries to locate in Spokane Valley. LUP -10.3 Encourage shared -use parking, pedestrian access and transit incentive programs in industrial development projects. Goal LUG -11 A variety of strategically located heavy industrial areas should be designated and protected from conflicting land uses. Policies LUP -11.1 Commercial, residential and recreational uses should be limited or not allowed in areas designated for industry, except for small -scale ancillary commercial and recreational uses intended to primarily serve the industrial area. LUP -11.2 Conversion of designated industrial lands to other uses should be strictly limited to ensure an adequate land supply. LUP -11.3 Provide appropriate buffering, landscaping and other development standards for industrial areas. LUP -11.4 Retail outlets shall be allowed for industrial businesses that manufacture and /or assemble products on -site. Goal LUG -12 Designate and protect a variety of strategically located light industry areas. Policies LUP -12.1 Commercial, residential and recreational uses shall be limited or not allowed in areas designated for light industry except for small -scale ancillary commercial and recreational uses primarily to serve the industrial area. LUP -12.2 Light industry areas shall include lighting, sidewalks, bike lanes and landscaping to provide a safe and attractive working environment. LUP -12.3 Retail outlets shall be allowed for industrial businesses that manufacture and /or assemble products on -site. Development Review Goals & Policies Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 31 of 35 Chapter 2 — Land Use City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Goal LUG -13 Develop and maintain an efficient and timely development review process. Policies LUP -13.1 Maximize efficiency of the development review process by continuously evaluating the permitting process and modifying as appropriate. LUP -13.2 Assist developers with proposals by continuing to offer pre - application meetings in order to produce projects that will be reviewed efficiently. Urban Design and Form Goals & Policies Goals LUG -14 Improve the appearance and function of the built environment. Policies LUP -14.1 Use performance and community design standards to maintain neighborhood character, achieve a greater range of housing options, and to create attractive and desirable commercial and office developments. LUP -14.2 Adopt specific regulations for designated aesthetic corridors that: • Provide incentives for aesthetic design; • Require landscaping buffers adjacent to roadways; • Limit sign height and size; • Provide performance standards to adequately screen intensive land uses that have exterior clutter such as outdoor storage, exterior heavy equipment and /or exterior fabrication /assembly. • Prohibit off - premise signage and billboards. LUP -14.3 Establish standards for the scale and intensity of commercial, retail and industrial signage that protect views and minimize signage clutter while allowing adequate business identification. LUP -14.4 Establish a "cap and replace" system for billboards. LUP -14.5 Designate aesthetic corridors along major transportation routes to provide a positive image of Spokane Valley. Aesthetic corridors shall be located along the following routes: • State Route 27 from 16th south to 32nd and Mansfield to Trent; • Appleway Boulevard (south side from Park to Dishman Mica); • Mirabeau Parkway from Pines to Indiana; • Dishman Mica Road from 8th Avenue, south to City limits • 32nd Ave. within the City limits • Appleway Blvd. from Barker to Hodges Historic and Cultural Resources Goals & Policies Goal LUG -15 Identify and protect archeological and historic sites and structures. Policies LUP -15.1 Continually identify and evaluate archaeological and historic sites to determine which should be preserved. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 32 of 35 Chapter 2 — Land Use City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan LUP -15.2 Link cultural resource preservation with local economic development strategies. LUP -15.3 Establish and maintain relations with Native American tribes for the preservation of archaeological sites and traditional cultural properties. LUP -15.4 Publicize the community's heritage through interpretive trails, historic plaques, art and other public displays. Land Use /Transportation Connection Goals & Policies Goal LUG -16 Provide a street system that connects neighborhoods. Policies LUP -16.1 Encourage new developments, including multifamily projects, to be arranged in a pattern of connecting streets and blocks to allow people to safely get around easily by foot, bicycle, bus, or car. LUP -16.2 Develop street, pedestrian path and bike path standards that contribute to a system of fully connected routes. LUP -16.3 Require adequate emergency evacuation routes prior to approving new development or redevelopment. LUP -16.4 Connect neighborhood services, public open space and parks with multi -modal paths. Joint Planning Goals and Policies Goal LUG -17 The City of Spokane Valley should continue to coordinate with Spokane County and neighboring cities for adjacent urban growth areas. Policies LUP -17.1 The City should coordinate with Spokane County to ensure appropriate service provision and land development prior to City annexation. Methods to allow for coordination may include, but are not limited to, execution of an interlocal agreement between the City of Spokane Valley and Spokane County to: • Establish guidelines for development plan review, impact fees and SEPA mitigation; and • Define service delivery responsibilities, level of service standards and capital facility implementation consistent with the goals and policies of this Plan. LUP -17.2 Through regional planning efforts, the City and County should ensure that planning is compatible with the Cities of Spokane and Liberty Lake. LUP -17.3 The City should continue coordinated planning efforts between Spokane County, appropriate fire districts, school districts, and water service providers to assure managed growth in urban growth areas. Potential Annexation Area Goals and Policies Goal LUG -18 Identify Potential Annexation Areas for the City of Spokane Valley that are consistent with the Spokane County regional urban growth area boundary. Policies Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 33 of 35 Chapter 2 — Land Use City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan LUP -18.1 Within the existing urban growth area, identify potential annexation areas that are contiguous to the city limits and not assigned to another city. LUP -18.2 Coordinate with adjacent cities and Spokane County to review and update the regional urban growth area boundary consistent with the Countywide Planning Policies and RCW 36.70. LUP -18.3 Propose changes to the regional urban growth area boundary necessary to accommodate Spokane Valley's 20 -year population allocation. LUP -18.4 The City will not accept requests to annex unincorporated territory located outside the designated urban growth area. LUP -18.5 Complete necessary capital facilities planning for any newly proposed urban growth areas in accordance with the Countywide Planning Policies. Goal LUG -19 Collaborate with adjacent cities, Spokane County, and affected residents. Policies LUP -19.1 Pursue interlocal agreements with Spokane County to support collaborative joint planning within potential annexation areas to ensure consistent development. LUP -19.2 Inform affected residents, property owners, and businesses in the annexation process. LUP -19.3 Include language in an interlocal agreement utilizing the tool of annexation, prior to urban development, to control the type, quality, and location of development in potential annexation areas. LUP -19.4 Coordinate with Spokane County to work with affected neighborhoods upon annexation to provide a smooth transition from Spokane County to the City of Spokane Valley administration. Goal LUG -20 Promote orderly growth within potential annexation areas. Policies LUP -20.1 Perform a fiscal analysis and provide a service plan for all areas proposed for annexation. Lup -20.2 Incorporate potential annexation areas in the Capital Facilities Plan including proposed locations for new capital facilities. LUP -20.3 Strive to retain neighborhood integrity in adjusting potential annexation areas boundaries. Goal LUG -21 Develop an annexation process for potential annexation areas Policies LUP -21.1 Evaluate annexations within the potential annexation areas based on the following criteria: • The City's ability, either in house, by contract, or by special purpose district, to provide public services at the City's adopted level of service • The annexation boundary should provide a contiguous and regular boundary with current City limits • The annexation boundary, where appropriate should use physical boundaries, including but not limited to, bodies of water, existing or future right -of -way, roads, and topography Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 2 — Land Use Page 34 of 35 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan • Assessment of staff time and expense involved in processing the annexation request • Review right -of -way issues prior to defining boundaries of individual annexations to determine logical inclusions or exclusions • The annexation boundary, where appropriate, should adjust any impractical or irregular boundaries • When the proposed annexation is located in the vicinity of a public facility, the City should evaluate the feasibility of modifying the annexation boundary to include the public facility LUP -21.2 Process annexations in accordance with State annexation laws in a timely and efficient manner. LUP -21.3 Generally, the City of Spokane Valley prefers the Petition Method of Annexation. LUP -21.4 Ensure that newly annexed territory accepts its equitable share of the City's bonded indebtedness. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 35 of 35 Chapter 2 — Land Use 2643 4 35 h 31 32 (' ' X2644 .-33 4 ' w -_— _— 5 1 � r 11 Wellesle I _— _- __- __- __- __- _ —__ - -y __ -__ -_— _— 2645 I ! _— _ - _•- 32 — _ _— _— _ -_ Map 2.1 Land Use C -ity of M _ IAve iTrent Spokane I - 290 2 Ave 3 1 0221 0� 0 03 Os^ a Ol o. 05 Legend I -- -- -- -SjTO'kane Utt e1I Ave City ofMillwaod P N N aeea K `A Mixed Use Center Pve Buck k� "Y Mane«a \\ Corridor Mixed Use 1 12• 07 O1 O8 ti/on�9gmeQ9 Mansfieltla 10 ml,;o 1,1 1 LL m�Or7 K 00$ Low Density Residential 290 Knox Ave =9 'wb _ Or Ave / - I� r y Medium Density Residential Y ASR _SRsgpreb a A CPA -02 -13 m Missions Citj' or - High Density Residential Sharp c ,Mission) Ave Ave 'LlbeY ;y Offi ce Ave LL o d = �. y g R ss: wb�,l s Lake ! EEEEEE ........:I Neighborhood Commercial Broadwa 14 Y 3 Ave I 18 17 Broa�dwa .16 1 A ve 14 13 'I' 118_ R 90 eb 17 ' ^� Community Commercial valleyway valley�ay I Regional Commercial Sprague CPA -03 -13 Ave LL CPA -01 -13 PPP�veay Li ht Industrial Ave Appleway sprague.Ave�l P g Thd Appleway Blvtl sR 90'eb Ave -ourth - ' r = F - Y 54q o _Heavy Industrial ir Blvd ourth Ave I ' ' Ave She71e I � Park/open Space Eig Mh Eighth r- 73 Eighth eyv�� 24 19 20 21 tit 24 y 19 20 Ave Ave r � Water Bodies id r _ A °¢ -16th ETT %Pq Ave I, � A /less. Ave - !y 26 23 - 1 X30 29 O i� 28 24th27 26 715 30 r 29 i �� Ave Ave � �_' - - - - -r Map Location m � Ave I � • _3 V a a 35 36 '�I 31 32 33 4 V 35 36 ''I 31 32 Effective Date: 08 /15/2012 Ordinance No. 12 -018 S 6 ' - � � pol.ane - - -- - - -- jUalley _ -- _ - Ave Thorpe 1 I 0 0.5 1 2 Miles 01'I 06 I 05 _ 04 �r 03 l2 i Notice: The information shown on this map is compiled from various 02 sources and is subject to constant revision. The City makes no claims 2443 �� i I o1 06 2445 06 or guarantees about the accuracy or currency fwis map and expressly disclaims liability for errors and omissions in its contents. I I To confirm accuracy contact the City of Spokane Valley, Community • -'I Development Department, Division ofplanming, (509) 921 -1000. I rxoaysc or me cry or Spokane vanes, co.�.wo�ty oevemp.�eoc oepam.�eoc City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan CHAPTER 3 — TRANSPORTATION 3.0 Introduction Transportation systems should provide for the safe and efficient movement of people and goods. Modes of transportation which impact Spokane Valley include roadway, transit, air, rail, bicycle and pedestrian. Each of these modes is addressed independently, although the development of an efficient and truly multimodal transportation system requires an evaluation of the interaction and interdependency of each mode in relationship to others Airport, rail and arterial roadways have implications for regional freight mobility. Transit, pedestrian and bicycle systems form part of larger systems with localized implications for the movement of people. Citizens should have a variety of viable transportation choices and the plan focuses on providing citizens with transportation options and reducing dependency on driving because: • The transportation preferences and needs of all people should be respected. All citizens, including those who cannot or choose not to drive, should have viable transportation options; • In the future, increasing numbers of people may not physically or financially be able to drive; • All people are pedestrians at some point; and • Continued dependency on driving may not be sustainable in the future, either economically and /or environmentally. Alternatives to driving must be truly viable. All transportation options must be safe, accessible, convenient and attractive. For instance, people might be more likely to use public transportation if service is frequent, routes to transit stops are pedestrian friendly and shops and services are located near stops. Safety is a critical factor; people will not choose transportation options they perceive to be unsafe. Safety is similarly important in the efficient movement of goods since they share road and rail transportation corridors. System design, direct routes and conflict reduction are key considerations in establishing a multimodal transportation system which provides mobility choices, moves people and goods effectively and safely, is coordinated with land use, maintains or improves air quality and mitigates impacts to the environment. 3.1 Planning Context The Transportation Element of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan (SVCP) establishes the framework for providing a transportation system (facilities and services), and focuses on actions needed to create and manage the transportation infrastructure and services. 3.1.1 Growth Management Act The Growth Management Act (GMA) (RCW 36.70A.020 [3]) "...encourages efficient multimodal transportation systems that are based on regional priorities and coordinated with county and city comprehensive plans." In addition, the act outlines guidelines for the preparation of the transportation plan, which is a mandatory element of the Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, these guidelines (RCW 36.70A.070 [6]) include: • The land use assumptions used in the plan; • Facility and service needs, including: 1. An inventory of existing facilities; Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 1 of 30 Chapter 3 — Transportation City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 2. Level of service standards for all facilities and services; 3. An action plan for brining system deficits up to standard; 4. Forecasts of future traffic growth; and 5. Identification of system expansion and transportation system management needs. • A financing plan which includes: 1. A comparison of funding needs versus available resources; 2. A six -year financing strategy; and 3. An assessment of how funding deficits will be managed. • Intergovernmental coordination efforts; • A demand management strategy; and • A concurrency management strategy. Moreover, the GMA requires that the Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) certify the transportation elements of local comprehensive plans. Certification is based upon conformity with state legislation related to transportation elements, and consistency of the City's element with the Metropolitan Transportation Plan. 3.1.2 County Wide Planning Policies Regional transportation planning services are provided by the SRTC, and coordinated by the Spokane Transit Authority (STA) and local jurisdictions, in accordance with federal and state planning requirements, and the Countywide Planning Policies for Spokane County (CWPPs). The CWPPs provide a policy framework for the County and its respective cities. Adherence to these policies ensures that plans within the County are consistent with one another. These policies address such issues as the designation of urban growth areas, land use, affordable housing, provision of urban services for future development, transportation, and contiguous and orderly development. The following are specific CWPPs that relate to the Transportation Element:' Policy Topic 3 — Promotion of Contiguous and Orderly Development and Provision of Urban Services Policies a. Each jurisdiction shall include policies in its comprehensive plan to address how urban development will be managed to promote efficiency in the use of land and the provision of urban governmental services and public facilities. The [GMA] Steering Committee has accepted a regional minimum level of service standards for urban governmental services with the exception of police protection within Urban Growth Areas (UGAs). Local jurisdictions may choose higher standards. In its comprehensive plan, each jurisdiction shall include, but not be limited to, level of service standards for: a. fire protection; b. police protection; c. parks and recreation; d. libraries; e. public sewer; f. public water; g. solid waste disposal and recycling; h. transportation; and ' Note to reader: The following policies are numbered according to the policy number in the CWPPs, resulting in non - sequential numbering in this document. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 3 — Transportation Page 2 of 30 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan i. schools2 3. Each jurisdiction shall include policies in its comprehensive plan to ensure that obstructions to regional transportation or utility corridors are not created. In addition, each jurisdiction should include policies in its comprehensive plan to ensure sustainable growth beyond the 20 -year planning horizon. Policy Topic 5 — Transportation 1. Regional transportation planning shall be conducted by the Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC). The SRTC shall coordinate with local jurisdictions and the Spokane Transit Authority (STA) to ensure that the regional transportation plan and local jurisdiction's land use plans are compatible and consistent with one another. 4. Comprehensive plans shall include, where applicable, the master plans of identified major transportation facilities to ensure that they are reasonably accommodated and compatible with surrounding land uses. Such facilities shall include, but not be limited to, airports, state highways, railroads and major freight terminals. 5. Local jurisdictions shall develop and adopt land use plans that have been coordinated through the Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) to ensure that they preserve and enhance the regional transportation system. These plans may include high- capacity transportation corridors, and shall fulfill air quality conformity and financial requirements of the Federal Transportation Laws and Regulations, the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, and the Growth Management Act (GMA). 7. In the long term, growth and change will necessitate the designation of specific transportation corridors which can support high capacity transportation. These corridors shall: a. be identified for the specific purpose of preserving the right -of -way necessary to implement a high- capacity transportation system and to provide a development density that will support such a system; b. be recognized in each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan and development regulations. These plans and codes should provide the authority to establish high - capacity transportation activity centers and urban villages having a land use pattern of mixed use density and intensities; c. be incorporated into capital facilities programs to provide a unified approach for preserving the character and quality of neighborhoods; d. be evaluated to identify both interim and ultimate transportation strategies for each corridor; e. encourage capital infrastructure investment to facilitate high- capacity transportation and supporting land uses; and f. be supported through a public education process. 8. The regional transportation plan and comprehensive plan of each jurisdiction shall include roads, air and rail service that accommodates the need for freight and goods movement. 9. Recognizing the need to maintain existing rail lines for shipments of commodities, which reduces the impacts of shipping commodities by roads, local jurisdictions should protect rail facilities to the extent possible. (Spokane County has not proposed a level of service for school districts to be adopted as part of the comprehensive plan. Individual school districts determine their own level of service standards. However, if any jurisdiction within Spokane County [itself] chooses to implement impact fees for schools at any future time, each school district must develop a capital facilities plan consistent with the GMA). Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 3 — Transportation Page 3 of 30 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 10. Each jurisdiction should coordinate its housing and transportation strategies to support existing, or develop new, public multimodal transportation systems. 11. Each jurisdiction shall address land use designations and site design requirements that are supportive of and compatible with public transportation, for example: a. pedestrian scale neighborhoods and activity centers; b. mixed use development; and c. pedestrian friendly and non - motorized design. 13. Each jurisdiction's transportation facilities shall be planned within the context of countywide, multi- county and bi -state air, land and water resources and shall not cause or contribute to exceeding federal or state environmental quality standards. 14. Each jurisdiction shall strive, through transportation system strategies, to optimize the use of and maintain existing roads to minimize the construction costs and impacts associated with roadway facility expansion. 15. In accordance with regional minimum level of service standards specified by the Steering Committee, each jurisdiction shall establish roadway standards, level of service standards and methodologies and functional road classification schemes to ensure consistency throughout the region and to support the use of alternative transportation modes. 16. Each jurisdiction shall address energy consumption /conservation by a. designing transportation improvements for alternatives to the single- occupant vehicle; b. locating and adopting design standards for new development to support pedestrian or non - motorized travel; c. providing regulatory and financial incentives to promote efforts of the public and private sector to conserve energy; and d. reducing the number of vehicle miles traveled and number of vehicle trips. 17. The transportation element of each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan, where transit service exists, will include level of service standards for transit routes and services. Each jurisdiction will coordinate the level of service standards with all adjacent jurisdictions and appropriate agencies. 18. Each jurisdiction shall use its adopted level of service standards to evaluate concurrence for long -range transportation planning, development review and programming of transportation investments. 20. Transportation elements of comprehensive plans shall reflect the preservation and maintenance of transportation facilities as a high priority to avoid costly replacement and to meet public safety objectives in a cost - effective manner. 21. Each jurisdiction, Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) and other transportation agencies shall identify significant regional and /or countywide land acquisition needs for transportation and establish a process for prioritizing and siting the location of transportation corridors and facilities. 3.1.3 Concurrency and Level of Service Concurrency as defined in the GMA3 means: 3 RCW 36.70A070(6) Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 3 — Transportation Page 4 of 30 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan ".. "local jurisdiction must adopt and enforce ordinances which prohibit development approval if the development causes the level of service on a locally owned transportation facility to decline below the standards adopted in the transportation element of the comprehensive plan, unless transportation improvements or strategies to accommodate the impacts of development are made concurrent with development. These strategies may include increased public transportation service, ride share programs, demand management, and other transportation system management strategies. For purposes of this subsection (6) "concurrent with development" shall mean that improvements or strategies are in place at the time of development or that a financial commitment is in place to complete the improvements or strategies within six years. (emphasis added) SRTC has been appointed by the Spokane County Growth Management Steering Committee to coordinate the development of regional transportation Concurrency Management Systems (CMS). Spokane County's CMS consists of regional and local concurrency reviews as described below. Regional: SRTC is responsible for monitoring and evaluating the performance of regional transportation facilities as affected by land use and transportation improvement decisions. SRTC uses travel times to assess performance or regional transportation corridors. A review of regional concurrency occurs on an annual basis. Local: Local jurisdictions are responsible for reviewing land use proposals within their jurisdiction and making determinations as to whether concurrency requirements are met as specified by their ordinance. The state is responsible for establishing performance standards on all highways of statewide significance, which are not subject to local concurrency requirements. Additional discussion of roadway concurrency is included in Section 3.2 below and in Chapter 4 Capital Facilities. 3.2 Streets & Roadways 3.2.1 Highways of Statewide Significance & Connectivity Spokane Valley is served by a network of publicly maintained streets and highways connecting local communities and urban centers in the greater Spokane region. Interstate 90 runs east/west through the city and provides direct linkages from the Spokane region west to the Seattle /Puget Sound region and east across the country. Spokane Valley also has two (2) state highways, State Route 27 (Pines Road) and State Route 290 (Trent Avenue). SR -27 provides access from Spokane Valley south into southeastern Spokane County and Whitman County. SR -290 provides Spokane Valley access to the east into areas around Rathdrum, Idaho. Both of the roadways provide important regional access to Spokane Valley. 3.2.2 Roadway Inventory and Functional Classification Functional classification is the grouping of highways, roads and streets by the character of service they provide, and was developed for transportation planning purposes. Basic to this process is the recognition that individual routes do not serve travel independently. Rather, most travel involves movement through a network of roads. Comprehensive transportation planning, an integral part of total economic and social development, uses functional classification to determine how travel can be channelized within the network in a logical and efficient manner. The Washington Department of Transportation (WSDOT) has the primary responsibility for developing and updating the statewide highway functional classification in rural and urban areas to determine functional usage of the existing roads and streets, and must cooperate with responsible local officials in developing and updating the functional classification. The results of the functional classification are mapped and submitted to FHWA for approval. Once approved, the map serves as the official record for Federal - aid highways and is the basis for designation of the National Highway System . 4 4 23 CFR 470 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 5 of 30 Chapter 3 — Transportation City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan A ROAD RIGHT OE WAY A �LBANE� LE R N �LBANE PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL LANE TYPICAL SECTION — N.T.S SIDEWALK LANDSCAPING SIDEWALK LANDSCAPING AND DRAINAGE AND DRAINAGE COLLECTOR ARTERIAL TYPICAL SECTION — N.T.S Interstate Freeway: The interstate is a controlled access, multi -lane, high speed, high - capacity roadway intended exclusively for motorized traffic. All access is controlled by interchanges and bridges separating local road crossings. Interstate 90 is the only freeway within the Spokane Valley city limits. Principal Arterials: Principal arterials serve the major centers of activity in urbanized areas and include the highest traffic volume corridors, serve the longest trips and carry a high proportion of the total urban travel, even though they constitute a relatively small percentage of the total roadway network. The principal arterial system carries most of the trips entering and leaving the urban area, as well significant intra -area travel, such as between central business districts and outlying residential areas. The system also carries important intra -urban and inter -city bus routes. Service to abutting land is subordinate to travel service to major traffic movements .5 ROAD RIGHT OE WAY A eINE LELANERN r`\ .I NE SIDEWALK LANDSCAPING AND DRAINAGE SIDEWALK LANDSCAPING AND DRAINAGE PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL TYPICAL SECTION — N.T.S Minor Arterials: The minor arterial street system interconnects with and augments the principal arterial system. It accommodates trips of moderate length at a lower level of travel mobility than principal arterials. This system places more emphasis on land access than the principal arterial system. Such a facility may carry local bus routes and provide intra- community continuity, but ideally does not penetrate identifiable neighborhoods. The spacing of minor arterials may vary from one tenth to one half mil (1/10 — 1/2) in central business districts, and two (2) to three (3) miles in suburban fringes, but is normally not more than one (1) mile in fully developed areas. Collector Streets: The collector provides both land access and traffic circulation within residential neighborhoods and commercial and industrial areas. It differs from the arterial system in that facilities from the collector system may penetrate residential neighborhoods, distributing trips from arterials through the area to their ultimate destinations. Conversely, the collector system also collects traffic from the local streets in residential neighborhoods and e FHWA Functional Classifications Guidelines Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 6 of 30 Chapter 3 — Transportation City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan channels it into the arterial system. In a central business district or other area of similar development and traffic density, the collector system may include the entire street grid. The collector street system may also carry local bus routes. Collectors may be separated into principal and minor designations, or into industrial or neighborhood classifications. Local Access Streets: The local access street system includes all facilities not designated as either an arterial or collector. It primarily permits direct access to abutting lands and connections to higher order systems. It offers the lowest level of mobility and usually contains no bus routes. Service to through- traffic movement is usually deliberately discouraged. Table 3.1 Roadway Mileage Summary for Spokane Valley Functional Class STATE CITY TOTAL Miles % Miles % Miles % 11 Urban Interstate 10.11 2.22% 10.11 2.22% 14 Urban Principal Arterial 11.46 2.52% 29.37 6.46% 40.83 8.98 All Principal Arterials 21.57 4.74% 29.37 6.46% 50.94 11.20% 16 Urban Minor Arterial 1.60 0.35% 59.53 13.09% 61.13 13.44% All Arterials 23.17 5.10% 88.90 19.55% 112.07 24.65% 17 Urban Collector 43.81 9.63% 43.81 9.63 All Collectors 43.81 9.63% 43.81 9.63 19 Urban Local Access 298.85 65.72% 298.85 65.72% All Local Access 298.85 65.72% 298.85 65.72% Totals 23.17 5.10% 431.56 94.90% 454.73 100.00% Source: Spokane Valley Public Works Department The procedures for classifying all roads and streets into functional systems are based on the most logical use of the existing facilities to serve present travel. A "future year" functional classification plan is based on projected "future year" population, land use and travel and will include, in addition to existing facilities, such new facilities as will be needed to serve "future year" land use and travel. Some of this new mileage will consist of new streets in expanding urban areas. Additional "new streets" may be identified in cases where adequate standards cannot be provided on the original location, or where an existing routing is excessively circuitous. In developing a "future year" classification, consideration has been given to the impact of foreseeable developments in other modes of transportation including high -speed rail service and improved air service. Population estimates for 2025 were made using the SRTC Visum model. The base for the Spokane Valley "future year" population is the 2000 Decennial Census. A basic assumption in assigning facilities to logical functional groupings is that higher order systems should generally serve the longest trips. Only comparatively few miles or urban streets and highways serve trips of any great length; a somewhat greater mileage serves trips of moderate length; and a substantial mileage serves comparatively short trips. Facilities which serve relatively long trips (including trips passing through urban area, trips between the suburbs and central city, trips between outlying communities, and long trips occurring within the central city) are likely to be functioning as arterials and should be considered for inclusion in the preliminary arterial system. The mileage for the functional classification is summarized on Table 3.4: The functional classification system is illustrated on Map 3.1. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 7 of 30 Chapter 3 — Transportation City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 3.2.3 Safety Street design and construction standards should accommodate the characteristics of vehicles utilizing the roadway, making adequate provision for weight, size and turning radius requirements. The four (4) general classes of design vehicles include passenger cars and light trucks, buses, large trucks and recreational vehicles. Bicycles are to be considered a design vehicle where bicycle use is allowed on the roadway. Traffic safety must consider roadway capacity, the type of traffic utilizing the roadway, terrain, access management, traffic volumes and congestion. Access management requires the management of access to land development while simultaneously preserving the flow of traffic on surrounding road systems in terms of safety, capacity and speed. The capacity of an arterial is often dominated by the capacity of individual signalized intersections. Intersection design improvements and signalization modifications should be considered as cost effective alternatives to the addition of additional travel lanes. Intersections must be designed to maintain visibility for the safety of motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians. Particular care is exercised at school crossings and in areas frequented by the elderly and disabled. 3.2.4 Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Transportation Systems Management (TSM) focuses on maximizing use of the existing systems travel capacity. The concept was first originated in the mid -1970s by the U.S. Department of Transportation. Since that time, it has been applied in a host of different ways in cities and metropolitan areas around the country. More recently, the 199 Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) expanded the vision of TSM, introducing the term Congestion Management Systems (CMS). TSM options can be grouped into the following categories: • Geometric Improvements • Signalization Improvements (including synchronization) • Access Management • Capacity Enhancements • Circulation 3.2.4.1 Geometric Improvements The term Geometric Improvements refers to projects intended to "re- shape" the physical layout of roads. Through reported problems and periodic monitoring, isolated improvements can be defined which will improve the operation of traffic and increase safety. Such improvements are under the City's control. While there are national and state level guidelines, the City's adopted design standards guide the design of these improvements. Sometimes called Spot Improvements, their low cost and net increase in efficiency make them particularly popular. 3.2.4.2 Signalization Improvements Signalization Improvements include traffic signal installation or removal, and operational strategies. To date, the City has relied on other agencies to service its traffic signals. Spokane County has maintained all signals that were previously under County control, while the state has operated those on certain state routes. This has produced a fragmented approach to traffic control. Traffic along Spokane Valley's major transportation corridors such as Sprague, Broadway, Argonne /Mullan and Sullivan would benefit from synchronization and improvement to signal timing and phasing. The cost of such improvements would likely be recovered by reduction in delay to drivers. Air quality would also be enhanced due to fewer unnecessary stops. In addition, Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 8 of 30 Chapter 3 — Transportation City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan transit reliability would increase as a result of these actions. Map 3.3 shows existing signalized intersections. 3.2.4.3 Access Management Access Management is another means to manage traffic flow efficiency, controlling intersection and driveway spacing to improve the safety and preserve capacity of major streets. Traffic conflicts are responsible for a high percentage of roadway crashes. By reducing the number of driveways and turning movements through shared access to multiple parcels, and restricting turning movements in congested areas, the safety and efficiency of the City's streets can be maintained. Access to adjacent property is one (1) of the major factors influencing functional classification. The State of Washington requires that access onto state facilities be granted by permit, and that such access conform to an access management classification system .6 Access management may reduce the number of driveways, the allowable movements or modify existing access points where recurrent problems have been observed, including those related to safety, traffic flow and maintenance of roadway capacity. 3.2.4.4 Capacity Enhancements Capacity Enhancements typically include road widening and /or redesign to assure an existing road segment operates as efficiently as nearby segments. For example, where a section of freeway carries more local, short tips than long distance through trips by adding a parallel frontage road, the freeway might operate more efficiently. Another example might consist of two (2) heavily -used streets being grade- separated at their intersection point to accommodate flow. Capacity enhancements typically are higher in cost than other TSM strategies. Funding from outside sources is limited. Therefore, such projects must be carefully justified. 3.2.5 Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Transportation Demand Management (TDM) is an approach to solving transportation problems that focuses on reducing the demand for automobile travel rather than increasing the system capacity (supply) for automobile travel. TDM strategies should be particularly aimed at reducing the volume of single- operator vehicles. TDM is a valuable tool with which to address transportation problems because it generally avoids the high environmental, financial, and human costs associated with capacity- oriented solutions, such as road construction. The Commute Trip Reduction Program provides TDM techniques locally. TDM involves two (2) types of strategies. One (1) strategy reduces the demand for single - operator vehicles (SOVs). This is accomplished through programs such as: • Employer- subsidized bus passes and other financial incentives for transit use; • Infrastructure changes, such as providing safe and convenient bicycle parking and safe and convenient bikeways from residential to work locations, or increasing the use of non - motorized modes of transportation; • Parking management that reduces the amount of easy and inexpensive parking for employees, provided this does not lead to an unacceptable reduction in available parking for residents in adjacent areas; • Preferential parking for car pools and vanpools; • Park and Ride facilities convenient to Interstate 90; • Construction of shelters at transit stops; 6 RCW 47.50, WAC 468.51 and 468.52 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 3 — Transportation Page 9 of 30 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan • The building of lockers, change rooms, and shower facilities for bicyclists; and • Ride match services. The other TDM strategy reduces the overall need for travel by any means. This is accomplished through programs, such as: • Flexible work schedules, including four (4) -day work week; and • Tele- working (using telecommunications and computer technology to work from home to another location). Several pieces of legislation have led the City into the realm of TDM. These include the State GMA, Commute Trip Reduction Act (CTRA), and federal level requirements under both TEA -21 and Clean Air Act Amendments as reflected in the State Implementation Plan. The GMA cites the need for a variety of "management actions" including the requirement that the transportation chapter of each plan include an identification of system expansion needs and TSM needs to meet current and future demands. The Act goes on to note: "After adoption of the Comprehensive Plan ... local jurisdictions must adopt and enforce ordinances which prohibit development approval if the development causes the level of service on transportation element of the comprehensive plan, unless transportation improvements or strategies to accommodate the impacts of development are made concurrent with the development. These strategies may include ...demand management and other transportation systems management strategies (emphasis added)." While TDM actions are aimed at reducing travel demand or, at least, shifting it to more opportune travel times, several focus on consolidating person trips to fewer vehicles. The City views transit/HCT use as key to reducing travel demand over the time horizon of this plan. 3.2.5.1 Commute Trip Reduction Act The Commute Trip Reduction Act (CTR) was passed by the State Legislature in 1991, and revised in 1997. It is also a part of the State Clean Air Act. The intention of the law is to improve air quality, reduce traffic congestion, and decrease fuel consumption. It focuses attention on larger employers with the intent or reaching concentrations of workers who might use shared -ride and non - motorized modes to travel to and from work. Working from 1992, or employer's survey year data as the base year, employers are encouraged to reduce SOV use and vehicle miles of travel (VMT) by 15 percent (15 %) in the first two (2) years, 20 percent (20 %) in four years, 25 percent (25 %) in six (6) years and 35 percent (35 %) in twelve (12) years. The City adopted Ordinance 03 -087 in November of 2003, to address the requirements of CTR. The ordinance establishes the requirements for employers with over 100 employees (affect employers) under CTR. 3.2.6 Roadway Concurrency Level of service (LOS) is a quantitative standard for the operating characteristics of the transportation system. The definitions for each level of service and methodologies for calculating LOS are contained in the Transportation Research Board Special Report 209, Highway Capacity Manual (2000). The GMA requires LOS standards for all arterials and transit routes and also requires that the standards be coordinated regionally. GMA does not define the procedure for measuring LOS. Many communities rely upon Highway Capacity Manual procedures, measuring LOS in terms of vehicle delay at intersections. This methodology does not account for the impact of mid -block left -turn lanes, curbs and gutters, sidewalks and other facilities. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 10 of 30 Chapter 3 — Transportation City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Levels of Service for Roadways are defined below: Level of Service Flow Characteristics A Free flow operations at average travel speeds, usually about 90% of the free -flow speed for the arterial class. Vehicles are completely unimpeded in their ability to maneuver within the traffic stream. Stopped delay at signalized intersections is minimal. B Reasonably unimpeded operations at average travel speeds usually about 70% of the free - flow speed for the arterial class. The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream is only slightly restricted and stopped delays are not bothersome. Drivers are not subjected to appreciable tension. C Stable operations. The ability to change lanes and maneuver in mid -block locations may be more restricted than in LOS B, and longer queues and /or adverse signal coordination may contribute to lower average travel speeds of about 50% of the average free -flow for the arterial class. Motorists will experience appreciable tension while driving. D Small increases in flow may cause substantial increases in approach delay and decreases in arterial speed. This may be due to adverse signal progression, inappropriate signal timing, high volumes, or some combination of theses. Average travel times are about 40% of free - flow speeds. E Characterized by significant approach delays and average travel speeds of one -third (1/3) the free -flow speed or lower, cause by adverse signal progression, high signal density, extensive queuing at critical intersections and inappropriate signal timing or some combination of these. F Arterial flow at extremely low speeds below one -third to one - quarter (1/3 — 1/4) of free -flow speed. Intersection congestion is likely at critical signalized locations, with high approach delays resulting. Adverse progression is frequently a contributor to this condition. Many of the roadways in Spokane Valley were built as rural facilities. Some have been improved using rural road design standards to carry higher traffic volumes, but are not supporting of the character and desires of an urban community. Therefore, the City will pursue a two (2)- tiered LOS standard: Intersections. Intersection LOS is calculated using standard Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) analysis procedures for the AM or PM peak hour, whichever is worse. • Roadway Segments. Roadway segment LOS will be based on allowable average daily traffic (ADT) on a roadway segment as a function of roadway characteristics. The allowable volumes will be developed following completion of the Comprehensive Plan. SRTC is tasked in the adopted countywide planning policies with establishing level of service standards for the regional street network. SRTC establishes travel time standards in the principal travel corridors. Table 3.2 indicates the corridors within the City of Spokane Valley for which travel time LOS has been established. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 11 of 30 Chapter 3 — Transportation City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 3.2 SRTC Congestion Management System travel Times 1999 Roadway From To AVI Average TModel2 2020 SB NB EB WB I -90 Sullivan Havana 7:45 Freeway 0.84 1 -90 8:41 Havana Sullivan 8:03 1 -90 Broadway 10:46 Freeway Argon ne /Dishman /Mica Sprague 1 -90 32nd Ave 2:23 2:13 Barker Road Sprague I -90 Upriver Dr 0.99 5:59 6:34 Sprague Avenue Sullivan Argonne 7:00 6:37 Argonne Sullivan 6:45 7:10 University Road Sprague 32nd Ave 3:34 3:46 Pines Road Sprague I -90 2:41 2:23 I -90 SR 290 2:28 3:11 Sullivan Road Sprague I -90 2:03 1:40 I -90 SR 290 4:12 4:25 Upriver Drive Frederick Sullivan 12:46 12:17 Source: Spokane Metropolitan Area Transportation Plan, November 1999. Updated 2002. The Washington State Transportation Commission sets the level of service standards for highways of statewide significance. The Commission coordinates the SRTC to establish level of service standards for state routes not on the highways of statewide significance system. Table 3.3 Roadways Exceeding 80% of Capacity 2025 Roadway From To Functional Class V/C Ratio 1 -90 Sullivan Barker Freeway 0.83 1 -90 Havana Carnahan Freeway 0.84 1 -90 Sprague Argonne Freeway 0.84 1 -90 Broadway Argonne Freeway 0.84 SR 27 Urban Boundary 32nd Ave Collector 0.97 Barker Road Sprague 4th Ave Minor Arterial 0.99 Source: SRTC 2025 Forecast 11/2004 The specific levels of service and resulting capital facilities plans are included in the Capital Facilities Element of this plan. Please refer to the Capital Facilities Element for a more detailed discussion of level of service, concurrency and the city's transportation facilities plan. SRTC has identified roadway segments expected to exceed 80% of volume /capacity ratio by 2025 (Table 3.3). Planning for additional capacity should be considered when traffic volumes reach this level. The SRTC Metropolitan Transportation Plan notes that intersection deficiencies impede the flow of traffic, even when sufficient capacity is otherwise available. Table 3.4 shows intersections expected to exceed 90% of capacity by 2025. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 12 of 30 Chapter 3 — Transportation City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 3.4 2025 Intersection Deficiencies Exceeding 90% of Capacity Roadway Cross Street Functional Class v/C Ratio 1 -90 Sprague Expressway 0.91 1 -90 Argonne EB On -ramp 1.01 1 -90 Pines EB On -ramp 092 1 -90 Pines EB Off -ramp 096 1 -90 Evergreen EB On -ramp 096 1 -90 Sullivan EB Off -ramp 091 Sprague University Principal 0.91 Barker Sprague Minor Arterial 1.04 SR 27 Belle Terre Collector 1.22 Appleway Park Principal Arterial 0.96 Appleway Thierman Principal Arterial 1.01 Source: SRTC 2025 Forecast 11/2004 3.2.7.1 Land Use The transportation system should be adequate to serve existing land uses and planned to meet future transportation demand. The adequacy of the system to meet local circulation needs, as well as regional transportation objectives, will be determined by existing and future land uses. The City of Spokane Valley street system is primarily a traditional grid with principal arterials laid out at approximately one (1) mile intervals, and minor arterials located approximately midway between principal arterials. Deviations from the grid result primarily from topographical limitations. Except in these areas, the grid distributes local residential traffic relatively evenly to the arterial network, although there is more direct access (properties fronting arterial roadways) than is desirable for the functional classification. The roadway network in non - residential areas is well developed, with little or no segregation of freight and passenger traffic. As the city grows, it should be anticipated that conflicts between the two (2) will increase. In commercial areas, the lack of access management on arterials has reduced roadway capacity significantly. At intersections in particular, placement of driveways may limit the effectiveness of design or signalization improvements. Local circulation and access along commercial corridors such as Sprague Avenue will be improved substantially by requiring shared and cross access between commercial properties as part of redevelopment. Changes in residential densities will increase the demand for transportation services. Encouraging higher densities along transit corridors will expand the mode choice, provided that pedestrian connections are planned appropriately. Safety and accessibility are primary concerns in providing access to schools and in providing for the elderly and the disabled. Expediting the flow of freight traffic and improving intermodal connectivity are important in creating attractive venues for business and industrial development. Land use plans should consider strategies for segregating freight movement from passenger traffic where possible. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 13 of 30 Chapter 3 — Transportation City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 3.2.7.2 Neighborhood /Sub -area Circulation Plans: Much of the future growth within Spokane Valley will occur as infill development or redevelopment. As neighborhoods make a transition from large lots and a rural character to smaller lots and higher density, it will be important to ensure connectivity of local roads and neighborhood collector streets. The purpose of developing neighborhood circulation plans is to determine the location of future local roads while the properties are undeveloped or underdeveloped. 3.2.7.3 City Center Through the public participation process, a "Preferred Land Use Alternative" was developed that includes the development of an identifiable city center in Spokane Valley. A major component of the City Center Alternative is the development of a grid street pattern within the city center. As the illustration indicates, a possible grid pattern of approximately 300 -400 feet would be ideal for the development of a city center. Pedestrian and bicycle mobility is a vital part AI Gr ` 'rr46 of the future City Center transportation system. Improvements for pedestrians and bicyclists should support increases in transit services and promote the development of the City Center. As the street system is developed to better accommodate the needs of pedestrians and bicyclists, a network of facilities for people on foot L and bikes should be established. Reducing the size of the street grid, improving auto circulation and creating pedestrian linkages through larger parcels is critical to establish walking patterns that reduce dependency on the auto. As individual sites are designed and developed to be more pedestrian - friendly and improved pedestrian linkages are provided, the pedestrian system will handle an increasing share of the trips. On- street parking and wide sidewalks, with street trees and other pedestrian amenities are important assets in promoting a pleasant shopping experience. Landscaped medians should be incorporated into the roadways adjacent to the City Center to channelize and control traffic movements. Block lengths within the City Center should be relatively short. Intersections should be landscaped with decorative pavement treatment to create a sense of place. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 14 of 30 Chapter 3 — Transportation ROAD RIGHT OF WAY BUILDING Q p BUILDING FACADE FACADE ON STREET _ ON STREET PARKING PARKING SIDEWALK SIDEWALK TREE WELL TREE WELL CITY CENTER TYPICAL SECTION - N.T.S of the future City Center transportation system. Improvements for pedestrians and bicyclists should support increases in transit services and promote the development of the City Center. As the street system is developed to better accommodate the needs of pedestrians and bicyclists, a network of facilities for people on foot L and bikes should be established. Reducing the size of the street grid, improving auto circulation and creating pedestrian linkages through larger parcels is critical to establish walking patterns that reduce dependency on the auto. As individual sites are designed and developed to be more pedestrian - friendly and improved pedestrian linkages are provided, the pedestrian system will handle an increasing share of the trips. On- street parking and wide sidewalks, with street trees and other pedestrian amenities are important assets in promoting a pleasant shopping experience. Landscaped medians should be incorporated into the roadways adjacent to the City Center to channelize and control traffic movements. Block lengths within the City Center should be relatively short. Intersections should be landscaped with decorative pavement treatment to create a sense of place. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 14 of 30 Chapter 3 — Transportation City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Special street design standards should be developed for the City Center. Special standards for extra -wide sidewalks (12 to 20 feet in width), pedestrian -scale street lighting, and additional amenities including benches, trash receptacles and landscaped corner treatment are typically included. 3.2.7.4 Freight & Goods Roadways should be designed for the type of traffic they serve. Designation of truck routes will expedite the flow of commercial traffic in other areas of the City and limit adverse impacts on residential neighborhoods. In order to prolong pavement life, minimizing the number of stops and starts along these routes and interconnecting signals for progressive movement should be considered. An important consideration in the establishment of truck routes is connectivity with sources of supply and distribution located outside the City, as well as major freight terminals and intermodal connections. Map 3.2 identifies truck routes within the City of Spokane Valley. The Washington Department of Transportation (WSDOT) classifies state highways, county roads and city streets according to the tons of freight that are transported each year. The freight and goods transportation system (FGTS) identifies the highways and roadways most heavily used by trucks and provides factual data to support funding for projects that improve conditions for freight transportation. The information is updated every two (2) years, and inclusion of data may be requested by the City Engineer. The tonnage classifications used for designating the FGTS are as follows: T -1: More than 1 million tons per year T -2: 4 million to 10 million tons per year T -3: 300,000 to 4 million tons per year T -4: 100,000 to 300,000 tons per year T -5: At least 20,000 tons in 60 days For purposes of this analysis, trucks are defined to include all trucks with two (2) rear -axles (six (6) tires) or larger. They also include larger two (2) rear -axle (four (4) tires) delivery vehicles such as express package delivery vans, bread trucks or any commercial vehicle. Private pickups, vans or recreational vehicles are not included. To aid in calculating annual tonnage, trucks are divided into categories, as shown below: Single Units — A single vehicle including dump trucks and mixers, regardless of the number of axles. Double Units — A two (2) -unit vehicle, normally a truck and trailer, generally with four (4) to six (6) axles. This category is basically any truck up to 80,000 lbs.; older double trailers can be included in this category. Trains — Normally a tractor and two (2) trailers r �!V �=m___.. - 1 } ; 4' Trucks rated from 80,000 lbs. to 105,000 lbs.; except gasoline tankers. In calculating the approximate freight tonnage, the following average weights were used: Singles: 7 tons Doubles: 27 tons Trains: 42 tons Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 15 of 30 Chapter 3 — Transportation City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Truck routes regulate through truck traffic and do not apply to freight movements with origination or destination on any roadway. The designation of truck routes is intended to direct through -truck movements to arterials designed for such traffic, and to limit the adverse impact of such traffic on adjacent land uses. Residential land uses are particularly sensitive to heavy truck usage. The designation of freight corridors generally improves traffic flow and freight mobility. 3.3 Non - Motorized Transportation (See Chapter 11 — Bike and Pedestrian Element) 3.4 Transit S pekane ValleY is Innaterl in Oho Coco Planning Peglnn of the ST O The City of Spokane Valley works with Spokane Transit Authority (STA) to foster appropriate transit service design that aligns transit facilities with adjacent land uses. This planning effort takes place for both near -term service implementation as well as long -term transit system improvements. Planning for transit involves coordination with other planning work related to land uses, utilities and other elements contained within this comprehensive plan. The STA ACurrently, STA provides basic fixed route sand a els- commuter peak bus is dQlAfnt Cnn Lane as WGII as nara +rani+ service. For individuals whose disability prevents them from usinq fixed route service, STA provides paratransit service and a wheelchair - accessible shared ride transportation service. wmthiA Both services are available in the City of Spokane Valley and throughout the Spokane Region. STA also offers vanpool services designed around the needs of commuters who are looking to share a ride to and from work. STA has a level of service policy stating that Basic or High Performance Transit service shall be available within no more than one - half mile of at least 85% of the Public Transit Benefit Area (PTBA) population residing within urban areas. In the snring of 2004 a Innal nntinn slanting ai ithnriZed- an arlrtitinnal throe tenths of 104 SA-18-16 tA-N fG.F tFaRSit, With a rI -ARAt AIAI USA Qf II -AA :200 Thi; STA G FFGRtly epeFateS twe (2) Park A _ �ME- MA M�..J�TC�� Providing convenient and accessible transit service can help reduce the reliance on single - occupant vehicles and increase mobility without building new streets and highways. High frequency transit service can also support economic development by providing affordable transportation for employees and by stimulating development or redevelopment along a particular Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 16 of 30 Chapter 3 — Transportation City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan corridor. Public right -of -way is limited and as demands for that space prow, transit provides and efficient way to move people around the city and the region and support growth in urban centers. Spokane Transit Authority's long -range plan, Connect Spokane: A Comprehensive Plan for Public Transportation includes a vision for the future of transit in the region. High Performance Transit (HTP) is a network of transit corridors providing all -day, two -way, reliable, and frequent service offering competitive speeds to the private automobile and features improved amenities for passengers. This HTP network also defines a system of corridors for heightened and long -term operating and capital investments. The HTP corridors that are envisioned to serve the City support the existing and planned land uses. Once implemented, they are expected to offer connections to the City of Spokane, Liberty Lake, Post Falls, Coeur d'Alene and other cities throughout the region. � a d S''o; uhC /liver ^y i n w = Spokane Valley .m a -tft a LU Ca U 3 >s Lj s a , F 8 E IF 8 r The Citv of Spokane Vallev will continue to coordinate with STA to desian and operate transit facilities and services that make connections within the transit system and other modes safe and convenient. The City of Spokane Valley will continue to work with STA to ensure that the design and location of stations and alignments will improve how people move through and perceive the city and contribute positively to the City of Spokane Valley's identity. It is the intention of the City of Spokane Valley to support a public transit system that builds strong neighborhoods and supports economic development. By providinq mobility and access to public transportation for the greatest number of people to the greatest number of services, lobs, educational opportunities and other destinations, public transportation will support the economic development and mobility goals of this City. disability pre,.4pptr, them frem 616iRg the reg6ilar foxed PA, UQ Thor, meap's that a PeFSGR M"At Saturday frorn 6- A-..rA. to 12 a.m., with sp-.P.gmr-,,Q- On SI-I.Rdays and holidays from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m.-Oa-st Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 17 of 30 Chapter 3 — Transportation City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Along south aide of,l - AppiewaY ElIvd .A. lr•.' �f / 4 AY _ - II ' I k � I t lon commended operatlans 1,Lcca rtd maintena enter at Bowd;sh Road Sharing segment$ of UPRR tracks LEGEND I tlghi Rsh 81apPn6 Ulty of Llherty Lako Light Rai BhtFane with Peek A FGde of Spakwe ofSpokana vailley DUN hall Allgnrnnt r 4 AMII.q Nil 3.5 Aviation Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 18 of 30 Chapter 3 — Transportation City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Spokane International Airport, the Airport Business Park, and Felts Field Airport are owned by the city and county of Spokane, and are operated and maintained by the Spokane Airport Board. Felts Field Airport's history traces back more than 85 years with its beginning as a landing field in a park area next to the Spokane River in the Spokane Valley. The airport's heritage includes the original site of the Washington Air National Guard. In the 1930's and 1940's, Felts Field served as Spokane's municipal airport with scheduled airline service from the airport terminal. That building, along with others at the airport is now on the National Register of Historic Places. All but approximately 10 acres of the 410 -acre Felts Field is located in the City of Spokane. Ten acres are located within the City of Spokane Valley. The airport is located at the North end of Fancher Road in the western Spokane Valley, and is now an active General Aviation airport with 320 based aircraft and more than 72,000 annual aircraft operations. Information for the combined Spokane Airport System is summarized in the table below: Table 3.5 Spokane Airports Data Dec -06 Dec -05 % Change YTD 2006 YTD 2005 Change Total Passengers 283,078 278,986 1.47% 3,224,423 3,197,440 0.84% Enplaned Passengers 141,283 140,147 0.81% 1,612,457 1,600,258 0.76% Deplaned Passengers 141,795 138,839 2.13% 1,611,966 1,597,182 0.93% Total Cargo (U.S Tons) 4,913.20 5,918.50 - 16.99% 57,369.30 57,623.00 - 0.44% Total Freight 4,891.30 5,080.10 - 3.72% 49,947.50 50,459.00 - 1.01% Freight On 1,970.00 2,212.10 - 10.94% 20,867.20 21,768.00 - 4.14% Freight Off 2,921.30 2,868.00 1.86% 29,080.30 28,691.00 1.36% Total Mail 21.9 838.4 - 97.39% 7,421.80 7,164.00 3.60% Mail On 5.3 311.4 - 98.30% 2,495.90 2,919.00 - 14.49% Mail Off 16.6 527 - 96.85% 4,925.90 4,245.00 16.04% Total Operations 7,036 6,588 6.80% 95,168 98,545 - 3.43% Air Carrier Operations 3,315 3,589 - 7.63% 39,539 42,081 - 6.04% Air Taxi Operations 1,467 1,620 - 9.44% 19,417 19,580 - 0.83% Itinerant General Aviation 1,010 859 17.58% 19,419 18,958 2.43% Local General Aviation 1,168 450 159.56% 15,508 16,019 - 3.19% Military Operations 76 70 8.57% 1,285 1,907 - 32.62% As of September 2001, Fed Ex began carrying mail, which is reported as freight. Freight, mail and cargo are reported in U.S. tons Source: Spokane Airports - Updated February 5, 2007 Felts Field is classified as a reliever airport in the Washington State Aviation System Plan. The airport is located adjacent to the city boundary; a portion of the southeast corner lies within Spokane Valley city limits. Felts Field has 361 based aircraft, including 289 single- engine aircraft and 24 multi- engine piston - powered aircraft. Annual general aviation operations totaled 29,000 in 2002. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 19 of 30 Chapter 3 — Transportation City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Airport facilities and affiliated properties support the local economy through a variety of activities. For example, a recent study estimated that the average general aviation trip generates approximately $700 in food, lodging and entertainment spending. According to the 2001 WSDOT Aviation Forecast and Economic Analysis study, the airport generated about 250 jobs with an annual payroll of $4.5 million, and 16.5 million in total annual sales output. Felts Field has two (2) runways, Runway 3R/21 L. Information about each runway is shown in Table 3.6. Table 3.6 Runway Attributes 3L/21 R 3R121 L Length 4,500 3,059 Width 150 75 Elevation 11952.9 1,946.5 Surface concrete asphalt Runway, 3L has runway end indicator lights, visual approach slope indicators (VASI) providing vertical guidance, and VOR and GPS and NDB non - precision approaches. Runway 21R is equipped with VASI's, as well as a medium density approach lighting system with runway alignment indicator lights ( MALSR), which, in conjunction with an instrument landing system, provides a CAT I precision approach to this runway end. The MALSR is pilot controlled when the tower is not in operation. There is a published non - precision approach to Runway 3R/21 L rather than a specific runway end. The Felts Field Airport Master Plan, adopted in October 2005, is a 20 -year needs assessment providing recommendations for improvements. The major recommendations of the master plan include construction of new taxiways, new development to the north along the river, and an extension of 550' to the main runway in the next 15 years to accommodate larger aircraft. The master plan also provides recommendations for the seaplane base located on the river adjacent to Felts Field. It is the only one (1) of its kind in Eastern Washington. The water landing is 6,000' long and 100' wide and accommodates approximately 450 landings annually. The Felts Field Master Plan calls for expansion of the airport's seaplane facilities over the next 20 years, including the construction of an additional dock, upgrades to existing docks, and improvements to the ramp. Map 3.4 Airport Hazards identifies regulated airspace pursuant to the Felts Field Airport Master Plan and 14 CFR Part 77 Subchapter E, Objects affecting Navigable Airspace and RCW 36.70A.510, RCW 36.70.547 within which structures exceeding specified heights and incompatible land uses may represent a threat to airport operations and the safe operation of aircraft utilizing Felts Field. Map 3.5 Land Use Compatibility identifies areas where restrictions on incompatible land use serve to protect persons and property adjacent to the airport. 3.6 Rail 3.6.1 Freight Freight rail service is provided by Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) and Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR). BNSF services an east -west route from Chicago to Seattle and Portland. The UPRR provides service to Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated :- — --- - - - - -- W =Lri 1 -° d- - - - - -T - - - -- - : - - -� �-C -- - ----- - - - - -- WASHINGTON STATE RAIL SYSTEM in City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Canada, the Yakima Valley and Portland. 3.6.2 Bridging the Valley The Bridging the Valley (BTV) project is a community- initiated project to explore the creation of one (1) common railroad corridor from which BNSF and UPRR would operate between Spokane, Washington and Athol, Idaho. This 42 mile corridor presently has 72 railroad crossings (46 in Washington) with over 494 trains in operation per week. Growth in train traffic i is forecast to increase annually by 3.4% over the next 20 years. Traffic accidents, traffic congestion from roadway closures, increased carbon monoxide emissions in the serious non - attainment area and noise significantly affect the economy, health, safety and general welfare of the i2 Ab9l." public in Spokane and Kootenai Counties, and therefore, TA;h°` �""`�° the Inland Northwest. ��T11ee Poet 'az M 141 _ The BTV project would eliminate approximately 51 at -grade M crossings through closure (35 in Washington), and _�yA ii} relocation of the Union Pacific Railroad mainline into the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway corridor. The — HOW" — U°A"°-°FENN" .°mF�R °r remaining twenty -one (21) crossings are wither currently grade separated (five existing grade separations in Washington) or would be grade separated (six in Washington) as part of this project. This approach would concentrate public investment into eight (8) railroad grade separations within Washington State into one (1) corridor to cross two (2) railroads rather than spread out public investment into 61 railroad crossings spread across 87 miles or railroad track. With an estimated total project cost of $252 million in 2001 dollars ($165 million in Washington /$87 million in Idaho), the Benefit /Cost ration of 1:4 indicates that the project makes economic sense and has benefits far exceeding its cost to the public ($80 million in net present value). Ultimately, by 2008 this project will create a triple track railroad corridor with a completely grade - separated roadway system. Both railway and roadway systems will be able to operate more efficiently and effectively throughout the corridor. The public can expect a significantly safer transportation system with less congestion and delay, as well as an environment with less carbon monoxide and substantially less noise pollution from train whistle blowing at the 35 at -grade crossings that currently exist in Washington. A summary of the crossings within the City of Spokane Valley affected by this project are shown in Table 3.7. Table 3.7 Bridging the Valley BNSF Crossing Proposal Current Proposed Havana At Grade Grade Separated Park At Grade Grade Separated Vista At Grade Close Argonne Grade Separated Modify Grade Separation University At Grade Close Pines At Grade Grade Separated Evergreen At Grade Close Sullivan Grade Separated Modify Grade Separation Flora At Grade Close Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 21 of 30 Chapter 3 — Transportation City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Barker At Grade Grade Separated Wellesley Grade Separated Remove Grade Separation Passenger rail service is provided daily by the Amtrak Empire Builder, with service to Seattle and Portland to the west and Chicago and Minneapolis to the east, as shown in the graphic below. Empire Builder • Wolf Point, MT Seatthe, WA ' • Spokane, WA 0:. . Fargo, ND Portland, OR Minneapolis-St- Paul, NI N Empire Builder Route Chicago, IL 3.7 Pipelines Pipelines are an integral part of the overall transportation picture. A number of pipelines are located within Spokane County and the metropolitan area. Yellowstone Pipeline Company (operated by Conoco /Phillips) maintains a high pressure petroleum pipeline and intermodal facilities located within Spokane Valley. Williams Pipeline and Pacific Gas & Electric transmission natural gas pipelines are located in within the unincorporated area of Spokane County. (See Map 6.1'x). 3.8 Multimodal /lntermodal Transportation The CWPPs, Policy Topic 5, Policy 3 states that "alternative modes of transportation to the automobile, including public transportation, pedestrian facilities, bikeways and air and rail facilities" shall be included in the regional transportation plan. * SEE CHAPTER 6 - UTILITIES Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 22 of 30 Chapter 3 — Transportation City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan "Multimodal transportation planning focuses on system choices, and adapts a generic, non -mode specific approach to defining and evaluating transportation problems. It then attempts to provide an unbiased estimate of each mode's contribution, singly or in combination, to solve the problem. Intermodal transportation planning, on the other hand, examines the policy and service interactions between modes, focusing on ensuring ease of movement for both people and goods when transferring from one (1) mode to another ".7 Multimodal Transportation: a. Market preferences for low density residential development results in increased amounts of auto - dependency, particularly in suburban areas with a large number of commuters. The lack of transportation system connectivity in many residential areas often obviates alternative transportation options available to individuals, including walking, bicycle and public transit. This is particularly the case where the lack of infrastructure for such alternatives is limited or non - existent. Public transit depends on ridership to remain a viable option, since systems depend on revenues generated by fares. Low density development and access limitation impede the attractiveness of transit in many suburban areas, both for the individual and the service provider. Bus transit utilizes the same street system utilized by automobiles, and the location of transit stops is an important consideration in evaluating mobility within the street network, particularly on two (2) -lane roads without bus pull -outs. HCT overcomes the adverse impact on the roadway system where located within a dedicated right -of -way. c. Bicycles also utilize the street network, although bicycle access can be supplemented with trails and shared pathways. Both bicycle routes and pedestrian ways should be separated from roadways designed for heavy commercial traffic as a safety measure. Regulations which prohibit parking in bicycle lanes is necessary to maintain the functionality of a bicycle system. d. Pedestrian mobility depends on the availability of well- maintained sidewalks and /or linked trails to destinations such as schools, employment and shopping. The utility of both pedestrian ways and bicycle routes may be compromised by inclement weather, particularly in areas of snow accumulation. Distance from schools, shopping and employment again is a significant factor in the effectiveness of the pedestrian network, as are pedestrian comfort and perception of safety. e. Truck acceleration and movement differs significantly from that of passenger cars and light trucks using the roadway. Truck acceleration /deceleration is generally slower, particularly in hilly terrain, and turning movements require additional space. It is advisable to segregate freight movement on the roadways from commuter routes on arterials with numerous stops or those without carefully synchronized signals. Trucks are usually the only alternative for the local delivery of commodities, and unlike passenger vehicles, are especially dependent on intermodal facilities such as airports, rail hubs or pipeline terminals. Adequate roadway access to these modes of freight transportation is a key consideration in improving overall mobility. f. Rail and pipelines operate within dedicated rights -of -way. Both modes are best suited to the movement of large quantities of particular types of goods. They necessarily rely on efficient linkages with other modes to make local deliveries. They generally represent conflict with other modes of transportation at the point on intersection, such as in the case with at -grade railroad crossings. These conflicts can occasionally cause serious issues of both mobility and safety. Technical Assistance Report, MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING IN VIRGINIA:, PAST PRACTICES AND NEW OPPORTUNITIES, Stephen C. Brich and Lester A. Hoel. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 3 — Transportation Page 23 of 30 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan g. Aviation relies on successful and efficient links with other modes of transportation serving both passenger traffic and freight movement. The nature of aviation is such that flight corridors have significant effects on adjacent land uses and the transportation serving those uses. 2. Intermodal Transportation The importance of the various types of intermodal transportation depends to a high degree on the service required and the land uses served, and the length of trips involved. a. In residential areas, a choice of mode favoring the individual is of greater importance. Transportation system choices for individuals will depend on the relative convenience, access and pricing of the alternatives. Public policy may seek to change the relative value of individual choices. They could no this by various means, including public improvement, offering financial /non - financial incentives, or adopting regulations. Public improvements. Improved pedestrian access to transit corridors, shopping and schools makes walking and public transportation more attractive to individuals using those facilities. Planning for higher density land uses adjacent these mode alternatives. Similarly, bus shelters and similar amenities which increase individual comfort and convenience will encourage additional utilization of alternative modes of transportation. Incentives. The Commuter Trip Reduction (CTR) program encourages car and van - pooling through corporate sponsorship. Additional incentives include telecommuting, company sponsored bus passes, and flexible work scheduling, which allows workers to avoid peak traffic periods. Where High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes are in place, vehicles with at least two (2) occupants benefit from reduced travel time. iii. Regulation. Local governments adopt regulations which have the affect of encouraging alternative modes of transportation. Decisions concerning freight movements are determined almost exclusively by the needs of suppliers and markets, but competitive pricing is probably the most significant factor in mode choice. "Just in time" delivery has replaced warehousing in most commodity markets, where delay is a cost factor. The efficiency of intermodal connections, loosely defined as that point where two (2) or more modes of transportation come together, e.g. roadways connecting airports, railroad loading facilities and freight terminals, pipelines and terminal facilities, depend more on the availability and adequacy of infrastructure and linkages. Through freight traffic should be segregated from origination /destination traffic to improve flow. iv. Signalization on roadways should be synchronized for commercial trucks to limit stopping and starting. Infrastructure in commercial and industrial areas should be designed to facilitate freight movement, including wide radii at intersections. vi. For goods moving on dedicated rights -of -way; reducing or eliminating points of conflict with other modes will facilitate mobility. 3.9 Citizen Participation The City conducted a citizen survey in the spring of 2004 to solicit community opinion on several general and other more specific transportation issues. The survey was a telephone survey conducted by Clearwater Research and was a statistically valid survey contacting over 400 households within the City of Spokane Valley. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 24 of 30 Chapter 3 — Transportation The majority of survey respondents (92 %) traveled less than fifteen minutes to work and nine out of ten drove to work. A majority of the respondents (69 %) believed that the construction of the Sprague /Appleway Couplet had been a useful transportation improvement and should not be returned to two (2) -way traffic. The graph right indicates responses rating the statement "Sprague /Appleway Couplet has been a useful improvement to overall roadway system." Further, 69% of the respondents indicate Appleway Boulevard east beyond its current terminus at University Road. Although 56% of the respondents indicated that they either strongly or somewhat supported the extension of the Couplet to Evergreen Road, another 35% were either strongly or somewhat opposed to this proposition. City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan d either strong support or somewhat supported ext 100% 100% Should making the streets 0 n =399 The Sprague/Appleway fl =� 80% Couplet has been a useful bicyclists a low, medium, or improvement to the overall high n,i,it, fnr the Cito 60% roadway system. 34% 40% 0 a , 22% 20 °Io 40% 25% 20% o v 0% Strongly Somewhat Neutral Somewhat Strongly disagree disagree agree agree d either strong support or somewhat supported ext 100% Should making the streets 0 n =399 80% friendlier for pedestrians and bicyclists a low, medium, or 60% high n,i,it, fnr the Cito 44% 34% 40% 22% 20 °Io Surveyors also asked citizens about 0% 1 — I the priority level for making major streets friendlier for pedestrians and Low priority Medium priority High priority snding bicyclists. Forty -four percent of the respondents said that the City should make this a high priority, while 22% stated that this should be a low priority for the City as indicated in the graph above. At the eight community workshops that were conducted during the spring and fall of 2004, an informal survey was taken which was based on the survey discussed above. The results from this informal survey generally supported the results of the statistically valid survey conducted by the Clearwater Research. The Spokane Valley Planning Commission held five (5) public hearings in June, July and September 2005. The Spokane Valley City Council held eight (8) public hearings on the Comprehensive Plan, concluding their deliberation on April 25, 2006. 3.10 Goals and Policies Streets and Roadways Goals & Policies Goal TG -1 Establish appropriate design standards for transportation facilities. Policies TP -1.1 Street design should provide for connectivity between residential neighborhoods and collectors. Discourage cut - through traffic. TP -1.2 Develop access management standards for each functional classification of roadway. Work to consolidate or remove existing access points when a roadway does not meet appropriate standards. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 25 of 30 Chapter 3 — Transportation City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Goal TG -2 Ensure that roadway systems are designed to preserve and are consistent with community character. Policies TP -2.1 Street design should complement adjacent development. TP -2.2 Discourage private roads as a principal means or access to developments. Private roads should be designed and constructed to public street standards. TP -2.3 Encourage landscaping, street lighting and beautification in the design standards for local access streets, collectors and arterials. TP -2.4 Ensure that Appleway Boulevard right of way is the minimum width necessary to accommodate future street and regional high eapaGity p rformance transit improvements. Goal TG -3 Improve local circulation and emergency access consistent with community character and safety. Policies TP -3.1 As funding allows, bring unimproved and rural cross sections up to adopted street standards. TP -3.2 As funding allows, make intersection improvements and increase storage capacity where appropriate. Goal TG -4 Minimize the negative impact from transportation systems on the natural environment, air quality, noise levels and fuel consumption. Policies TP -4.1 Restrict high -speed traffic from residential neighborhoods and utilize traffic calming strategies to reduce vehicular speeds where appropriate. TP -4.2 Complete local traffic circulation plans for areas experiencing new development. TP -4.3 Continue the retrofit of signal lights to lower- energy LEDs. TP -4.5 Reduce the amount of vehicle idling within the City through implementation of signal synchronization and driver awareness. Transportation System Management (TSM) Goals & Policies Goal TG -5 Extend the functional life of the existing transportation system and increase its safe and efficient operation through the application of TSM strategies. Policies TP -5.1 Implement traffic signal synchronization projects as the primary component of a TSM program. As funding permits, monitoring or traffic operation should be carried out to assure efficient timing of traffic signals. TP -5.2 Use Access Management measures, such as placing restriction on left turns across major arterial streets to reduce accident rates and extend capacity of major arterials. TP -5.3 Consider grade- separated railroad crossings where appropriate. TP -5.4 Ensure that pedestrians, bicyclists and the physically handicapped are taken into account when developing signalized intersections. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 3 — Transportation Page 26 of 30 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Goals & Policies Goal TG -6 Encourage all Commute Trip Reduction affected and voluntary employers in Spokane Valley to achieve the CTR Act travel reduction goals. Policies TP -6.1 Encourage car -and van - pooling, telecommuting, flexible work schedules and other strategies identified in the CTR to reduce overall travel demand. TP -6.2 Use video - conferencing and conference calling for off -site meetings where feasible. Freight & Goods Goals & Policies Goal TG -7 Provide for safe and efficient freight mobility. Policies TP -7.1 Discourage development of low- density residential development in close proximity to designated freight corridors and intermodal freight facilities. TP -7.2 Designate appropriate truck routes in the City of Spokane Valley. TP -7.3 Design designated freight corridors to improve traffic flow and freight mobility. TP -7.4 Disperse traffic throughout commercial districts rather than concentrating it on a single arterial. Goal TG -8 Adapt street and roadway design and facilities to manage traffic demand, address the need for freight movement, resolve traffic conflicts, and complement land use and urban features. Policies TP -8.1 Use the City's transportation system and infrastructure to support desired land uses and development patterns. TP -8.2 Allow for variety of services within neighborhoods that are convenient to and meet the needs of neighborhood residents, decreasing the need for driving. Non - motorized Transportation Goals & Policies (See Chapter 11- Bike and Pedestrian Element) Transit Goals & Policies Goal TG -10 Work with Spokane Transit Authority (STA) to foster a public transportation system that conveniently serves City residents during all hours of the day, seven days a week and can become the preferred form of travel to major destinations, including commercial, employment and residential areas.Support th of — saf,e, effiGient, and r_ogt e#esthxA TP -10.1 Work with STA to ensure that transit shelters, bus benches and other amenities that support transit use are provided in appropriate locations for users of the system. TP -10.2 Work with STA in planning and developing safe and efficient 61RIGadoRg PG transit access points. TP -10.3 Support the continued planning and development of other transit options, including but not limited to a high performance- sapasity transit system. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 3 — Transportation Page 27 of 30 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan TD-10 4Einnniv °� USA- of fi 181_offinion4 vehides the ni ihlin transportation system. TP -10.4 Support walking to transit by developing the pedestrian network that serves transit centers, stations, and stops. TP -10.5 Provide adequate crossing opportunities at transit stops. TP -10.6 Plan and design pedestrian improvements that allow adequate space for transit stop facilities. TP -10.7 Encourage developers to work with City and Spokane Transit staff early in their development process to determine how their new development can be best served by existing and future transit service. TP -10.8 Maintain a system of streets that supports the movement of transit vehicles for local trips. Goal TG -11 Encourage land uses that will support a high- sapasi'-j- performance transportation system. Policies TP -11.1 Ensure that street standards, land uses, densities and building placement support the facilities and services needed along transit routes to make transit viable. TP -11.2 Work with STA to facilitate neighborhood business areas are served by transit. TP -11.3 Ensure that Appleway Boulevard right -of -way is the minimum width necessary to accommodate future street and high- eapaG##— performance transit improvements. TP -11.4 Support the development of high performance transit throughout the City with the intention of improving personal mobility, fostering economic development and enhancing the character of the City. Aviation Goals & Policies Goal TG -12 Support the expansion of general aviation and freight uses at Felts Field in accordance with the approved Airport Master Plan. Policies TP -12.1 Encourage the full development and utilization of airport properties at Felts Field. TP -12.2 Encourage commercial, educational and logistical support industry in close proximity to the airport. Goal TG -13 Encourage land use and development compatible with airport uses and regulated airspace. Policies TP -13.1 Enforce regulations protecting airspace from encroachment. TP -13.2 Discourage incompatible land uses and residential densities adjacent to the airport. Rail Goals & Policies Goal TG -14 Support and encourage the continued viability of the passenger and freight rail system in the region. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 3 – Transportation Page 28 of 30 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Policies TP -14.1 Participate with other jurisdictions to facilitate safe and efficient rail systems. TP -14.2 Support the "Bridging the Valley" project to reduce the number of at -grade railroad crossings in the City of Spokane Valley and to reduce the adverse noise impact on adjacent properties of railroad operations. TP -14.3 Discourage incompatible land uses and residential densities along rail corridors. Pipeline Goals & Policies Goal TG -15 Cooperate with pipeline operators to maintain safe operating conditions at intermodal facilities and along pipeline easements. Policies TP -15.1 Establish guidelines for the development/redevelopment of properties adjacent to pipeline corridors. TP -15.2 Develop regulations governing the use, handling and transportation of pipeline products. TP -15.3 Evaluate the need for designation of hazardous cargo routes associated with pipeline products as well as other hazardous materials. TP -15.4 Include provisions in the Hazard Mitigation Plan for mitigation of and response to product leakage, spillage and explosion. Intermodal /Multimodal Goals & Policies Goal TG -16 Encourage improved intermodal connections to facilitate freight movements in and between strategic commercial and industrial locations, and to provide mode choice for citizens and businesses. Policies TP -16.1 Remove obstructions and conflicts between roadway corridors and bicycle /pedestrian /transit modes. TP -16.2 Encourage freight intensive operations to locate along designated truck routes and intermodal terminals. TP -16.3 Evaluate the need for public improvements, incentives and regulation to increase intermodal fluidity. Street Preservation Goals & Policies Goal TG -17 Extend the life of City street infrastructure by developing a street Preservation program to ensure streets are maintained on an ongoing basis to minimize higher cost reconstruction in future years. Pnliriac TP -17.1 Maximize maintenance techniques such as crack sealing, fog sealing, patching, shoulder repair, grading, overlays and mill and overlays to avoid costly repairs resulting from street failure. TP -17.2 Maintain a pavement management system to monitor the City's streets to ensure regular maintenance of the streets at lower costs. TP -17.3 Maintain the City's streets at a high level to prevent individual segments from falling into more costly treatment categories. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 29 of 30 Chapter 3 — Transportation City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan TP -17.4 Continue to maintain reserve funds for ongoing maintenance of the street network. TP -17.5 Continue to develop long -term maintenance strategies that minimize the costs to the City. TP -17.6 Minimize pavement cuts whenever possible and when cuts are necessary ensure aualitv pavement replacements to reduce future maintenance costs to the Citv. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 30 of 30 Chapter 3 — Transportation Map ■ Arterial Street Plan Legend Current Classification ='Nil - �; - 11■ IIIIIIIIIII�IIIO .1 - .... _ _ State or Federal _ 111® -- — Principal Arterial -M.�._ • — Collector • �111�11 11fi�r -_ w ` MEN 1M , �C ©win 1 S ��Ih' �IJ 1� ��■ -i ■ ■IG■ 1 lid '� " – – ■�i ■■ III per..:. LI ■ W1.0-11 Proposed PLadyard 11,11E a ME— MEM16.11E. 101 ME ME ME City of Spokane Valley Other Municipalities ,rh ms's Urban Growth Area _�_3 iN �1_ 11 `CIE =1.�I■�I■ � - � ' :, Water Bodies pN■. r ■1■ _ �_:= • lira i BEN Opp , 1 - -- am - -- aFi= -- :1. Map Location n— 61 ■L' ® - - - Removed Ordinance No, 12-0 4 r = .. i ■: or guarantees about the accuracy or currency ofthis map and expressly disclaims flabilityfor errors and omissions in its contents. To confirm accuracy contact the City ofSpokane Valley, Community Development Department, Division ofPlanning, (509) 921-1000. City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan CHAPTER 4 — CAPITAL FACILITIES AND PUBLIC SERVICES 4.0 Introduction The Growth Management Act (GMA) requires new development to be directed to areas that either currently have adequate public facilities and services, or to areas where facilities and services can be delivered within the 20 -year time frame of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan (SVCP). Facilities and services that are required for new development must be adequate and available at adopted levels of service (LOS). Locally established LOS help to define and contribute to Spokane Valley's quality of life. 4.1 Planning Context This section provides a review of the policy directives included in the State's Growth Management Act (GMA) and the Countywide Planning Policies relating to capital facilities planning. 4.1.1 Growth Management Act The GMA refers to capital facilities planning in two (2) of the thirteen (13) statewide planning goals. The two relevant goals are: • Urban Growth. Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner. • Public facilities and services. Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards. More specifically, the GMA mandates that the City prepare a capital facilities plan which contains the following components: • An inventory of existing facilities owned by public entities, showing the locations and capacities of the facilities. • A forecast of the future needs for such facilities. • The proposed locations and capacities of expanded or new facilities. • At least a six -year financing plan that will finance such facilities and clearly identify sources of public money for such purposes. • A requirement to reassess the Land Use chapter if probable funding falls short. 4.1.2 Countywide Planning Policies The Countywide Planning Policies (CWPP), originally adopted in 1994, contain a number of goals and policies regarding capital facilities and the provision of urban services. Those CWPP relevant to capital facilities planning are as follows:' Policy Topic 1 — Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) Urban Growth Area Designation Process for New Incorporated Cities: 1. The Steering Committee of Elected Officials will assign new incorporated cities an interim population allocation based on the Office of Financial Management population forecasts and previous allocations to the former unincorporated area. Note to reader: The following policies are numbered according to the policy number in the CWPPs, resulting in non - sequential numbering in this document. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 1 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 2. The new city will conduct a land capacity analysis using the Land Quantity Methodology adopted by the Steering Committee. a. The city will first determine land capacity inside its limits and then will examine the capacity of unincorporated UGAs adjoining the jurisdiction's boundary. 3. The new city will develop the Urban Growth Area proposal as part of its comprehensive planning process. a. The proposed UGA shall be presented to the Steering Committee at a public meeting. The new city must justify its UGA proposal, showing how the interim population allocation will be accommodated. b. The city must show how the area will be providing a full range of urban services within the 20 -year timeframe of the comprehensive plan. c. All Urban Growth Areas lying adjacent to the new city should be analyzed and either proposed as the jurisdiction's UGA, a Joint Planning Area (JPA), or proposed to be removed from the UGA and converted to rural land. d. The city will show its work by presenting its land capacity analysis, urban service analysis and other information as appropriate. 4. The Steering Committee will conduct a public hearing on the population allocation and the Urban Growth Area and /or the (or Joint Planning Area) proposal. The Steering Committee will vote on the proposal and will forward a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners via minutes from the public hearing. 5. The Board of County Commissioners may conduct a public hearing on the proposed Urban Growth Area, and /or the proposed Joint Planning Area, and population allocation. After the hearing, the Board will approve and adopt, modify or return the proposal to the city for revision and /or adoption. Policies a. The new city shall include the approved or modified UGA and /or the JPA in its comprehensive plan. b. The new UGA or JPA will become an amendment to the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan by incorporation. Urban Growth should be located first in areas already characterized by urban growth that have existing public facility and service capacities to serve such development, and second in areas already characterized by urban growth that will be served by a combination of both existing public facilities and services and any additional needed public facilities and services that are provided by either public or private sources. Further, it is appropriate that urban government services be provided by cities, and urban government services should not be provided in rural areas. Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) include all lands within existing cities, including cities in rural areas. 2. The determination and proposal of an Urban Growth Area (UGA) outside existing incorporated limits shall be based on a jurisdiction's ability to provide urban governmental services at the minimum level of service specified by the Steering Committee. Jurisdictions may establish higher level of service standards in their respective comprehensive plans. 5. Each jurisdiction shall submit proposed interim and final Urban Growth Area (UGA) boundaries to the Steering Committee, including: a. Justification in the form of its land capacity analysis and the ability to provide urban governmental services and public facilities; b. The amount of population growth which could be accommodated and the analytical basis by which this growth figure was derived; and Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 2 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan c. How much unincorporated land is required to accommodate growth, including maps indicating the additional areas? 8. Each municipality must document its ability to provide urban governmental services within its existing city limits prior to the designation of an Urban Growth Area (UGA) designation outside of existing city limits. To propose an Urban Growth Area (UGA) designation outside of their existing city limits, municipalities must provide a full range of urban governmental services based on each municipality's capital facilities element of their Comprehensive Plan. 11. Each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan shall, at a minimum, demonstrate the ability to provide necessary domestic water, sanitary sewer and transportation improvements concurrent with development. Small municipalities (those with a population of 1,000 or less) may utilize approved interim ground disposal methods inside of Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) until such time as full sanitary sewer services can be made available. Each jurisdiction should consider long -term service and maintenance requirements when delineating Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) and making future land use decisions. 12. Within Urban Growth Areas (UGAs), new developments should be responsible for infrastructure improvements attributable to those developments. 18. Extension of urban governmental services outside of Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) should only be provided to maintain existing levels of service in existing urban like areas or for health and safety reasons, provided that such extensions are not an inducement to growth. Policy Topic 2 — Joint Planning within Urban Growth Areas Policies 1. The joint planning process should: a. Include all jurisdictions adjacent to the Urban Growth Area and Special Purpose Districts that will be affected by the eventual transference of governmental services. b. Recognize that Urban Growth Areas are potential annexation areas for cities. c. Ensure a smooth transition of services amongst existing municipalities and emerging communities. d. Ensure the ability to expand urban governmental services and avoid land use barriers to expansion; and e. Resolve issues regarding how zoning, subdivision and other land use approvals in designated joint planning areas will be coordinated. 2. Joint planning may be accomplished pursuant to an interlocal agreement entered into between and /or among jurisdictions and /or special purpose districts. Policy Topic 3 — Promotion of Contiguous and Orderly Development and Provision of Urban Services Policies Each jurisdiction shall include policies in its comprehensive plan to address how urban development will be managed to promote efficiency in the use of land and the provision of urban governmental services and public facilities. The Steering Committee shall specify regional minimum level of service standards (see Table 4.1) for urban governmental services with the exception of police protection within Urban Growth Areas (UGAs). Local jurisdictions may choose higher standards. In its comprehensive plan, each jurisdiction shall include, but not be limited to, level of service standards for: Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 3 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan a. fire protection; b. police protection; c. parks and 10 hrA fiesrecreation d. libraries; e. public sewer; f. public water; g. solid waste disposal and recycling; h. transportation; i. schools. Table 4.1 Regional Level of Service Standards FACILITY LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD (LOS) Domestic Water Supply - Minimum Levels of Service for storage capacity and flow shall be consistent with the Washington State Department of Health requirements and the Spokane County Coordinated Water System Plan requirements (where applicable). System Design — Minimum Levels of Service for pipe sizing, flow rate, and systematic grid Domestic Water development shall be consistent with the Washington State Department of Health requirements and the Coordinated Water System Plan requirements (where applicable). Fire Flow — Fire flow rate and duration as well as fire hydrant specifications and spacing shall be consistent with local fire authority requirements or the Fire Code, whichever is more stringent. Incorporated areas will be provided with wastewater collection and transport systems in accordance with the adopted sewer concurrency requirements of the jurisdiction. Unincorporated urban growth areas will be provided with wastewater collection and transport systems in accordance with the requirements for sewer concurrency as set forth in Spokane County's Development Regulations. Collection systems and transport systems will be designed for peak flow conditions so that overflows, backups, and discharges from the system do not occur under normal operating situations. Specific design criteria shall conform to the requirements of the Washington State Department of Ecology and local regulations. Wastewater collection and transport systems will convey wastewater to centralized wastewater treatment facilities. Centralized wastewater treatment and effluent disposal facilities will be planned, designed, and Sanitary Sewer constructed to provide effluent that does not adversely impact the quality of surface or ground water of the State of Washington. Planning and design for wastewater treatment and effluent disposal facilities will be based on 20 year projections of population growth and current water quality criteria as established by the Washington State Department of Ecology. (Centralized wastewater treatment facilities shall be a part of a sewage system owned or operated by a city, town, municipal corporation, county, political subdivision of the state or other approved ownership consisting of a collection system and necessary trunks, pumping facilities and means of final treatment and disposal and approved or under permit from the Washington State Department of Ecology.) Transportation Maintain travel corridor time as established by Spokane Regional Transportation Council. Flooding of property outside designated drainage -ways, de -facto drainage -ways, easements, flood zones or other approved drainage facilities, during the design precipitation or runoff event prescribed in the standards of the governing local agency or jurisdiction, shall be prevented within the reasonable probability afforded by such standards. Impact to buildings and accessory Stormwater structures shall be avoided to the maximum extent practicable by evaluating the effects of a 100 - year rain event, and implementing measures to ensure that the runoff attendant to such event is directed away from such buildings and accessory structures. Any stormwater discharge to surface or ground waters must meet federal, state, and local requirements for water quality treatment, stormwater runoff and infiltration. Each jurisdiction shall specify in its Comprehensive Plan a level of police protection that addresses Law Enforcement the safety of its citizens. Libraries Each jurisdiction will specify its own level of service. Parks Each jurisdiction will specify its own level of service. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 4 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.1 Regional Level of Service Standards FACILITY LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD (LOS) Solid waste processing will meet Federal and State regulations, including maintaining any required Solid Waste facilities licenses. Each jurisdiction within the non - attainment area shall develop and use a street cleaning plan, coordinating with Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority (SCAPCA) as the oversight agency, to meet mandated Particulate Matter dust standards. Each jurisdiction's street cleaning plan will describe the programs and methods to be used to reduce particulate matter emissions from paved surfaces. Each plan shall address but not be limited to the following: 1) Street Street Cleaning sweeping frequency and technology to be employed. 2) Factors for determining when and where to initiate street sweeping following a sanding event, with the goals of expeditious removal when safety and mobility requirements have been satisfied. 3) Sanding reduction goal. 4) Sanding materials specifications to be employed. 5) Locations, application rates and circumstances for use of chemical de -icers and other sanding alternatives. 6) Identification of priority roadways (over 15,000 average daily traffic count). Public Transit Jurisdictions within the Public Transit Benefit Area (PTBA) shall have policies consistent with the level of service adopted by the Spokane Transit Authority Board of Directors. Urban areas jurisdictions in excess of 5,000 population, or once a population of 5,000 persons is achieved, shall be served by Fire District with at least a (Washington Survey and Rating Bureau of Insurance Services Office) Class 6 Insurance Rating or better. For the purposes of GMA minimum Levels of Service, Class 6 or better shall be based on the ISO Grading Schedule for municipal fire protection, 1974 edition, as amended, by using the fire district, fire service communication, and fire safety control portions of the grading schedule. The total deficiency points identified in these portions of the ISO or Washington Survey and Rating Bureau schedule shall not exceed 1,830 Fire and Emergency points. All jurisdictions, regardless of size, shall ensure that new development has a Fire Flow and hydrant placement per the International Fire Code adopted by that jurisdiction. Urban areas must Services be within 5 road miles of an operating fire station that provides service with a "Class A" pumper, unless structures are equipped with fire sprinkler(s) that are rated in accordance with the edition of the International Fire Code adopted by the jurisdiction, and is located within 5 road miles of an operating fire station that provides service with a Class "A" rated pumper. Urban areas shall be served by a state certified basic life support (BLS) agency. Urban areas should be served by an operating basic life saving unit within 5 miles; and an operating advanced life support unit within 6 miles or 10 minutes response time for those jurisdictions with urban areas in excess of 5,000 in population; and basic life support and advanced life support transport service. Public Schools To be determined by individual school district CFP. 2. Each jurisdiction and other providers of public services should use compatible information technologies to monitor demand for urban governmental and regional services and the efficiency of planning and services delivery. 3. Each jurisdiction shall include policies in its comprehensive plan to ensure that obstructions to regional transportation or utility corridors are not created. In addition, each jurisdiction should include policies in its comprehensive plan to ensure sustainable growth beyond the 20 -year planning horizon. 7. Each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan shall include, at a minimum, the following policies to address adequate fire protection. a. Limit growth to areas served by a fire protection district or within the corporate limits of a city providing its own fire department. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 5 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan b. Commercial and residential subdivisions and developments and residential planned unit developments shall include the provision for road access adequate for residents, fire department or district ingress /egress and water supply for fire protection. c. Development in forested areas must provide defensible space between structure and adjacent fuels and require that fire -rated roofing materials be used. 9. Wellhead protection plans should be coordinated with water purveyors and implemented by local jurisdictions. The Steering Committee shall pursue strategies for regional (to include Idaho jurisdictions) water resource management, which sustain projected growth rates and protect the environment. 10. Each jurisdiction shall include provisions in its comprehensive plan for the distribution of essential public facilities. 13. Each jurisdiction shall plan for growth within Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) which uses land efficiency, adds certainty to capital facilities planning and allows timely and coordinated extension of urban governmental services, public facilities and utilities for new development. Each jurisdiction shall identify intermediate growth areas (six to ten year increments) within its Urban Growth Area (UGA) or establish policies which direct growth consistent with land use and capital facility plans. Policy Topic 9 — Fiscal Impacts Policies 1. Each jurisdiction shall identify, within the capital facilities element of its comprehensive plan, capital resources that will be available to accommodate the additional development which is anticipated within Urban Growth Areas (UGAs). 4.2 Essential Public Facilities The City of Spokane Valley is required to plan for essential public facilities (EPFs) pursuant to GMA. Spokane County adopted through the CWPPs "Growth Management Essential Public Facilities Technical Committee Report" in 1996, which set forth a model project review process for the siting of EPFs. All jurisdictions within the County are required to provide a mechanism in the Comprehensive Plan to utilize the model project review process either verbatim or as a model. More recently, the Washington State Legislature passed two laws addressing siting of EPFs. In June 2001 the state enacted ESSB 6151, and in March 2002 the state enacted ESSB 6594. These laws require counties and cities fully planning under GMA to include a process in their Comprehensive Plans to provide for the siting of Secure Community Transition Facilities (SCTFs). A "secure community transition facility" (SCTF) is the statutory name for a less restrictive alternative residential facility program operated or contracted by the Department of Social and Health Services. As stated in RCW 71.09.020, "...a secure community transition facility has supervision and security, and either provides or ensures the provision of sex offender treatment services." The program offers 24 -hour intensive staffing and line -of -sight supervision by trained escorts when residents leave the facility. A less restrictive alternative (LRA) placement is defined in the state law as a living arrangement that is less restrictive than total confinement. In response to these new state laws, planning staff from all jurisdictions in Spokane County formed a task force to cooperatively develop a regional siting process for all essential public facilities, including SCTFs. The Essential Public Facilities Task Force, with assistance from the Washington State Office of Community Development (OCD), the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS), and technical staff from the jurisdictions developed a regional siting process for essential public facilities titled Spokane County Regional Siting Process for Essential Public Facilities. Table 4.2 below lists EPFs that are either wholly or partially located within the City. The regional process provides for a review process with a location analysis. Public involvement takes place throughout the process with public comment periods as well as public hearings. The Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 6 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan review process requires the applicant for an EPF to assume responsibility for the bulk of the analysis and processing of the proposal. The analysis includes two parts. First, an analysis of functional criteria of all potential sites is conducted to select the highest- ranking ten (10) semi- finalist sites. Second, these ten semi - finalist sites are analyzed using more qualitative criteria and resulting in selection of at least three (3) preferred sites. Both analyses include public comment periods. Next, the Board of County Commissioners (BoCC) conducts a public hearing on the Preferred Site List to allow for further public comment, identify strategies to address any issues associated with particular sites, and rank the finalist sites. The BoCC ranking is advisory to but not binding on the applicant. Last, the applicant, after selecting a specific site, will work directly with a local jurisdiction and its regulatory requirements to permit construction and operation of the EPF. The regional siting process is based on a coordinated inter - jurisdictional approach, which in combination with consistent development regulations among the jurisdictions will implement the requirement of equitable distribution of EPF of a statewide or regional /countywide nature. Table 4.2 Inventory of Essential Public Facilities Significance Category Name Address Statewide Regional Transportation Facilities Interstate 90 N/A Statewide Regional Transportation Facilities Centennial Trail N/A Regional Regional Transportation Facilities Pence -Cole Valley Park & Ride and 414 S. University Rd Transit/Transfer Center Regional Regional Transportation Facilities Pines Road /I 90 Park & Ride E. Montgomery, Pines Rd & 1 -90 Regional Regional Transportation Facilities STA Maintenance — Bowdish (Fleck 123 S. Bowdish Service Center) Regional Regional Transportation Facilities SR -27 (Pines Road) N/A Regional Regional Transportation Facilities SR -290 (Trent Avenue) N/A Regional Solid Waste, Wastewater & Water Valley Recycling - Transfer 3941 N. Sullivan Rd Facilities Regional Social Service Facilities Valley Hospital & Medical Center 12606 E. Mission Ave Regional Social Service Facilities American Behavioral Health Systems 12715 E. Mission Ave 4.3 Goals and Policies The following goals and policies are consistent with the goals and policies of the GMA and the Countywide Planning Policies. The City of Spokane Valley will implement the goals and policies for services provided by the City. Special purpose districts, such as water, school, and fire, are encouraged to implement the goals and policies that are under their control. Spokane Valley intends to coordinate with special purpose districts when they adopt and amend their own system plans and capital improvement programs. General Goal CFG -1 Provide facilities and services that the City can most effectively deliver, and contract or franchise for those facilities and services that the City determines can best be provided by a special district, other jurisdiction, or the private sector. Policies CFP -1.1 Review plans of service providers within Spokane Valley to determine consistency with the SVCP. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 7 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan CFP -1.2 The City should seek a balance between the quality and cost of providing public facilities and services. CFP -1.3 Optimize the use of existing public facilities and promote orderly compact urban growth. CFP -1.4 Coordinate the construction of public infrastructure with private development to minimize costs whenever practicable and feasible. Capital Facilities Planning and Level of Service Goal CFG -2 Adopt and implement a Capital Facilities Plan to ensure public facilities and services meet Level of Service Standards. Policies CFP -2.1 Facilities and services shall meet the following minimum Level of Service standards: Table 4.3 Spokane Valley Level of Service Standards Facility or Service Level of Service Standard Domestic Water Meet the minimum Regional LOS* Sewer Public sewer required for new development Transportation LOS D for Signalized Intersections LOS E for Un- signalized Intersections Stormwater Meet the minimum Regional LOS* Law Enforcement No minimum LOS adopted Parks 1.92 acres per 1000 residents Libraries Library District to set LOS Solid Waste Meet the minimum Regional LOS* Street Cleaning Meet the minimum Regional LOS* Public Transit Meet the minimum Regional LOS* Fire and EMS Meet the minimum Regional LOS* Public Schools School Districts to set LOS * See Page 4 for Regional LOS standards CFP -2.2 Update the City's Capital Facilities Plan annually to ensure that services and facilities are provided efficiently and effectively and to help establish budget priorities. CFP -2.3 Planned expenditures for capital improvements shall not exceed estimated revenues. CFP -2.4 If adopted level of service standards cannot be maintained, the City shall increase funding, reduce level of service standards or reassess the Land Use Element. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 8 of 61 Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Public Safety - Fire and Police Goal CFG -3 Provide police protection efficiently and cost effectively to Spokane Valley residents. Coordinate with fire districts to ensure adequate fire protection and emergency services for Spokane Valley citizens. Policies CFP -3.1 Encourage inter - jurisdictional cooperation among law enforcement agencies and fire districts to further develop, where practical, shared service and facility use. CFP -3.2 Develop a comprehensive emergency management plan that meets the needs of the City and coordinates with regional emergency planning efforts. CFP -3.3 Require adequate emergency vehicle road access and water supply /pressure for new development within the City. CFP -3.4 Encourage property owners to create a defensible space between structures and adjacent fuels and require that fire rated roofing materials are used on buildings in forested areas. Water and Sewer Goal CFG -4 Plans for water and sewer service should be consistent with the SVCP. Policies CFP -4.1 Review water and sewer plans to determine consistency with anticipated population growth, future land uses, comprehensive plan land use policies and development regulations. CFP -4.2 Coordinate sewer planning with appropriate jurisdictions for consistency with the SVCP. CFP -4.3 Support continued planning for domestic water needs in partnership with water purveyors, the Joint Aquifer Board, Washington State Department of Health and the Washington State Department of Ecology. CFP -4.4 Encourage public and private efforts to conserve water and to provide public education regarding the safe and appropriate use of the waste treatment system (i.e., NOT using drains and toilets for pharmaceuticals, grease, diapers, etc.). CFP -4.5 Discourage new, private domestic wells within the Spokane Valley City limits. CFP -4.6 New development must connect to public sewer and water. CFP -4.7 Consider grey water re -use and rainwater harvesting technology when and where appropriate and feasible. CFP -4.8 Encourage use of less water - intensive, native vegetation where possible. Solid Waste Goal CFG -5 Promote the reduction, re -use and recycling of solid waste. Policies CFP -5.1 Establish a City Hall recycling program to present a positive example of civic and environmental responsibility. CFP -5.2 Participate in updates to the Spokane County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management plan and support its implementation. CFP -5.3 Work toward reducing waste at City- sponsored events through the provision of recycling canisters and other means. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 9 of 61 Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan CFP -5.4 Provide links to reduction, re -use and recycling information on the City web site. CFP -5.5 Encourage the recycling of construction site waste. Stormwater Goal CFG -6 Ensure the provision of stormwater facilities and related management programs that protect surface and groundwater quality, prevent chronic flooding from stormwater, maintain natural stream hydrology, and protect aquatic resources. Policies CFP -6.1 Require stormwater management systems for new development. CFP -6.2 Create and implement a stormwater management plan to reduce impacts from urban runoff. CFP -6.3 Best management practices should be utilized to treat stormwater runoff prior to absorption of runoff into the ground. CFP -6.4 New development should include the multiple uses of facilities, such as the integration of stormwater facilities with recreation and /or open space areas, when possible. CFP -6.5 Encourage the use of alternatives to impervious surfaces, including permeable pavers, pervious pavement, subsurface drainage chambers and garden roofs. CFP -6.6 Consider programs limiting the use of herbicides, pesticides and fertilizers containing phosphates or other harmful chemicals. Library Service Goal CFG -7 Promote efficient and cost effective library service to Spokane Valley residents. Policies CFP -7.1 Encourage continued free, reciprocal library services among all libraries within the Spokane region. CFP -7.2 Land use regulations should allow siting of library facilities in locations convenient to residential areas. CFP -7.3 Work collaboratively with the Spokane County Library District to develop long - range library plans consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Schools Goal CFG -8 School sites and facilities should meet the education needs of Spokane Valley citizens. Policies CFP -8.1 Develop land use designations that allow new schools where they will best serve the community. CFP -8.2 Consider the adequacy of school facilities when reviewing new residential development. CFP -8.3 Assist school districts in their planning processes. CFP -8.4 Encourage educational and vocational institutions to develop programs that will result in local employment opportunities for graduates. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 10 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan CFP -8.5 Coordinate with school districts to use school facilities as community centers where appropriate. Concurrency Goal CFG -9 New development shall be served with adequate facilities and services at the time of development, or within the time frame consistent with state law. Policies CFP -9.1 Implement a concurrency management system for transportation, water and sewer facilities. Financing Growth Goal CFG -10 Consider a variety of revenue sources and funding mechanisms including, but not limited to, impact fees. Policies CFP -10.1 Identify and pursue sources of revenue for financing public facilities. Essential Public Facilities Goal CFG -11 Collaborate with all Spokane County jurisdictions in determining the best locations for public and private essential public facilities. Policies CFP -11.1 Follow the process for siting essential public facilities as set forth in the Spokane County Regional Siting Process for Essential Public Facilities. Potential Annexation Areas Goal CFG -12 Provide capital facilities to serve and direct future growth within the City of Spokane Valley Potential Annexation Areas Policies CFP -12.1 Plan and coordinate the location of public facilities and utilities in the potential annexation areas CFP -12.2 Considering, in advance, property acquisition opportunities for future facilities including but not limited to parks, police facilities, stormwater facilities, greenbelts, open space, and street connections CFP -12.3 Coordinate with adjacent jurisdictions in developing capital improvement programs and studies addressing multi - jurisdictional issues 4.4 Capital Facilities Plan 4.4.1 Introduction The Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) provides an analysis of the facilities and services required to support the future land use and growth projected in the Comprehensive Plan. The CFP includes a six_ year capital projects and a financing plan for facilities provided by the City. The finance plan identifies specific revenue sources that the City reasonably anticipates will be available in the year the project is scheduled to be constructed. The CFP includes Level of Service (LOS) standards for each public facility or service and requires that new development be served by adequate facilities. The purpose of the CFP is to use sound fiscal policies to provide adequate public facilities consistent with the land use element and concurrent with, or prior to, the impacts of development. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 11 of 61 Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 4.4.2 Growth Assumption On June 9, 2009, the Spokane County Board of Commissioners (BoCC) approved a population allocation of 18,746 people for the City of Spokane Valley. The allocation is the amount of people the City can accommodate within its current municipal boundary. In addition, the BoCC approved a population allocation of 8,138 people for the unincorporated Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) adjacent to the City of Spokane Valley. The City of Spokane Valley has identified the adjacent UGAs as Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs). The City has identified existing service providers to help determine the effects on existing levels of service in the event of annexation. Capital facilities planning activities within these UGAs continue to be the County's responsibility. The following population data is used for capital facilities planning purposes: Table 4.4 Population Projection Year 20122013 20122019 393 2033 Population 994991.218 95;39395.332 48-,693105.668 4.4.3 Level of Service Cities are often defined by the quality of facilities and services that are provided to its residents. Good road, sewer and water infrastructure are typical criteria used by businesses considering relocation. Park and recreation facilities are increasingly used to judge the quality of a City. Businesses want to locate where they can attract the best employees, and quality of life issues are often the deciding factor for a person to move to a new area. Level of service standards are quantifiable measures, such as acres of parks per 1000 people, or the amount of time it takes to travel a road segment during peak morning and afternoon "rush hours," the higher the level of service the higher the cost. This element establishes levels of service which will be used to evaluate the adequacy and future cost of urban facilities and services. 4.4.3 Concurrency The Growth Management Act introduces the concept of concurrency, which requires new development to be served with adequate urban services at the time of development, or within a specified time thereafter. The GMA allows six years for necessary transportation improvements to be constructed as long as a financial commitment is made at the time of development. The GMA strongly encourages concurrency for water and sewer, and it is good public policy to require the same. 4.4.4 Financing Facilities and Services The City is limited in its ability to finance all desired capital facility projects. Options must be available for addressing funding shortfalls or decisions must be made to lower levels of service for public facilities. In deciding how to address a particular shortfall, the City will need to balance current needs versus future growth requirements; existing deficiencies versus future expansions. Capital facilities plans must be balanced. When funding shortfalls occur, the following options should be considered: a. Increase revenues, b. decrease level of service standards, c. decrease the cost of the service or facility, d. decrease the demand for the service or facility, e. or some combination of the above. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 12 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan The following table presents possible financial resources available to the City for capital projects. Table 4.5 Funding Resources Funding Category Funding Source General Fund (Sales Tax, fees, property tax, utility tax, etc.) Current Revenues Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) Impact Fees Non -voted General Obligation Voted General Obligation Bonds Revenue (payable from a particular utility or enterprise) Local Improvement District (Assessment Bonds) Surface Transportation Program Bridge Replacement Funds Federal Grants Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) Land and Water Conservation Fund Community Development Block Grants Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account (ALEA) Transportation Improvement Account Centennial Clean Water Fund Public Works Trust Funds Interagency for Committee for Outdoor Recreation (IAC) State Grants /Loans Arterial Street Fund (Motor Fuel Tax) Urban Arterial Trust Account (UATA) Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account Hazardous Bridge Replacement Community and Economic Revitalization Board Water Pollution Control Fund Developer Contributions Other Donations Local Improvement Districts 4.4.6 Impact Fees New growth creates a demand for new and expanded public facilities and services. The GMA authorizes local governments to impose and collect impact fees to partially fund public facilities to accommodate new growth. Impact fees can be used to pay for new or expanded facilities and cannot be collected to address existing infrastructure deficiencies. The GMA allows impact fees to be assessed on the following: • Public Streets and Roads • Schools • Fire Protection Facilities • Public Parks • Open Space • Recreation Facilities Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 13 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan The City has not enacted impact fees as a funding mechanism for capital facilities, but may study the issue as directed by future City policy. 4.4.7 Community Facilities This section of the CFP includes civic buildings such as government offices, community centers, and entertainment facilities. As a new City, Spokane Valley does not have a significant inventory of community facilities. Inventory of Existing Facilities Spokane Valley completed construction of CenterPlace at Mirabeau Point Park, in the summer, 2005. The facility houses the Spokane Valley Senior Center, conference facilities, classrooms and a "great room" for events. CenterPlace has a dining capacity of 400 and includes a full commercial kitchen. Spokane Valley leases office and meeting space for employees and City Council in the Redwood Plaza office building, located at 11707 East Sprague Avenue. Spokane Valley also leases precinct and court space at the Valley Precinct Building located 12710 East Sprague. Level of Service Spokane Valley does not propose to adopt a level of service standard for community facilities. Forecast of Future Needs The need for new community facilities is difficult to quantify and depends on the future structure of City government. If Spokane Valley continues to contract for services such as police, parks and road maintenance, the need to acquire and maintain facilities will be minimal. However, if Spokane Valley begins providing these services, there will be a corresponding need for administrative office space and other facilities. For example, if Spokane Valley assumes responsibility for parks maintenance, a new maintenance facility would have to be constructed to house equipment and employees. At some future point, Spokane Valley will likely purchase an existing building or construct a new building to house City Hall. This decision must be made with thought and vision. In the right location, City Hall will be the center for civic affairs and community events and will influence economic development in the area where it is constructed. . The location should be centralized and accessible to all citizens. Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities Spokane Valley currently has no specific plans to construct new community facilities. The City must decide the location of a permanent City Hall and /or other civic buildings. Future updates to the Capital Facilities element will include information on locations and capacities for community facilities. Capital Projects and Financing Plan Spokane Valley anticipates either constructing a new City Hall building, or purchasing and remodeling an existing building within the six year time frame of this CFP. hAws that SpekaRG VaIIGY Will 6168 appreximately $i,000,000 ef Real Estate Exrigsp TA r e Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 14 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.6 Community Canili#ies Cina g Plan (Dollars in Thousands) ates� 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total trtWb Cnrili #iec 3Z $4-W $ $� $4Gg $40g $40g $40g oe �8kFF62 $a-9Z $499 $409 I $499 $499 $499 $2397 4.4.8 Domestic Water The City of Spokane Valley does not own or operate a public water supply system. Rather, water is provided to Spokane Valley residences and businesses by and public and private corporations. Water service is coordinated by Spokane County through the Coordinated Water System Plan (CWSP), which identifies service boundaries, establishes minimum design standards and promotes the consolidation of regional water resource management. The CWSP is updated as needed at the direction of the Board of County Commissioners or the Washington State Department of Health (DOH). e aistricts, associations The City of Spokane Valley is supportive of existing ' regional water supply planning, water use efficiency programs and plans, watershed wellhead protection plans, water quality plans, and planning for reclamation and reuse. Water Systems planning, Water systems are categorized generally by the number of connections served; Group A systems provide service to 15 or more connections while Group B water systems serve fewer than 15 connections and fewer than 25 people per day.Gre p B SyStems servo 7 #n '1 it nnnnon#innc g roup B water systems are regulated under chapter 246 -291 of the Washington Administrative Code W( AC). In 2009, the Governor and the Legislature set a new direction for regulating Group B public water systems by eliminating all state funding for this program and providing regulatory flexibility. They did this because Group B systems serve a small population, and the cost to provide regulatory oversight is relatively high. The law authorized the State Board of Health (Board) to: • Establish reauirements for the initial desian and construction of a Group B water system This change allowed the Board to eliminate ongoing requirements after initial approval of the system. It also allows local health jurisdictions (health department or health district) to establish Group B requirements that are more stringent than state requirements. • The law also authorized the Board to eliminate some, or all, regulatory requirements for Group B systems serving four or fewer connections. The current rule only eliminates reauirements for some one and two connection Group B systems. Spokane Valley has 25 Group A systems and 13 Group B systems providing water service within the City. A detailed inventory of water systems is shown below in the inventory section. Water System Plans The Washington State Department of Health recommends that all water purveyors prepare a water system plan to determine future needs for water facilities within their service areas. The plans must include an existing facility inventory, project future needs for water supply, conservation strategies, Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 15 of 61 Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan and identify and provide for the protection of aquifers against contaminates. Once a water system plan is adopted, it must be updated every six years. The Department of Health is the approval authority for water system plans. Water purveyors meeting the following criteria are required to have water system plans approved by DOH. 1. Systems having 1000 or more connections. 2. Systems required to develop water system plans under the Public Water System Coordination Act of 1977 (Chapter 70.116 RCW). 3. Any system experiencing problems related to planning, operation and /or management as determined by the Department of Health. 4. All new systems. 5. Any expanding system. 6. Any system proposing to use the document submittal exception process in WAC 246 -290- 125 (documents such as project reports and constructions drawings). In 2003, the Washington State Legislation passed what is commonly referred to as the "Municipal Water Law" (MWL), amending sections of the State Board of Health Code (RCW 43.20); the laws governing Public Water Systems (RCW70.119A); and sections of the state's Water Code (RCW 90.03). The MWL requires that water system planning documents must be consistent with Spokane Valley's Comprehensive Plan and development regulations. The Department of Health is developing procedures that water systems must follow to ensure coordination with local jurisdictions and consistency with growth planning. Water Rights Washington State water law requires all prospective water uses to obtain a water right permit from the Department of Ecology (DOE) before constructing a well or withdrawing any groundwater from a well. However, the law does allow a water right permit exemption, referred to as the domestic exemption, which states that no water right permit is required for the withdrawal of up to 5,000 gallons of water per day from a well when the water is being used for the following: 1. Livestock watering. 2. Single or group domestic water supply. 3. Industrial purposes. 4. Irrigation of no more than one half acre of lawn or noncommercial garden (RCW 90.44.050). For many years, Ecology issued water right certificates to water suppliers based on projected future use, rather than actual "beneficial use." The unused portions of those certificates or rights are known as "inchoate" rights, which could potentially be taken away by Ecology if not put to beneficial use. This situation was troubling to municipal water suppliers. Public water systems need a level of certainty to obtain financing for capital facilities as well as to issue letters of water availability to development interests. The "Municipal Water Law: of 2003" clarified that cities are entitled to inchoate (unused) water for the purpose of serving expanding areas. This ensures that municipalities have sufficient water for anticipated growth based on the communities' comprehensive plans and water and supply plans. Watershed Planning In 1998, Washington State passed the Watershed Management Act to develop a "thorough and cooperative method of determining what the current water resource situation is in each Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) of the state and to provide local citizens with the maximum Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 16 of 61 Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan possible input concerning their goals and objectives for water resource management and development" (RCW 90.82.005). In late 1998, a Planning Unit was formed for WRIAs 55 and 57, or the Middle Spokane - Little Spokane River watersheds, with Spokane County designated as the lead agency. The Watershed Management Act requires the Planning Unit to address water quantity issues and allows water quality, habitat and in- stream flows to be considered in the process. The watershed planning effort is expected to produce information on how water is used in the Water Resource Inventory Areas and recommendations for how it should be used in the future. The Planning Unit may also formulate a recommendation for in- stream flows for the Spokane and Little Spokane Rivers. The Department of Ecology may establish minimum water flows or levels for streams, lakes or other public waters for the purpose of protecting fish, game, birds or other wildlife resources, or recreational or aesthetic values of said public waters whenever it appears to be in the public interest to do so. The data, information and recommendations generated by the Planning Unit may be used by the Department of Ecology to assess the ability to issue new water rights for the Spokane Valley - Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer. The WRIA 55 and 57 planning process will provide a basis for better understanding of potential water resource limits and will be incorporated into future updates to this capital facilities plan. Inventory of Water Systems Most of the water used by Spokane Valley residents and businesses is provided by water and irrigation districts and small water systems, listed in Tables 4.7 and 4.8 and shown on the Water Districts and Wellheads map, located at the end of this chapter. The City of Spokane provides water to the western portions of Spokane Valley, totaling approximately 620 connections. Group A water systems are those which have 15 or more service connections or regularly serve 25 or more people 60 or more days per year. Group B water systems serve two to 14 connections and are not subject to the federal Safe Drinking Water Act. Instead, they must meet state and local requirements for water quality and operations. Table 4.7 Spokane Valley Water Purveyors - Group A Systems Current Residential Current Non Residential Storage Group A Systems Connections Connections Capacity (gallons) Bayou On Barker 0 4 0 50 Burger Royal 4 1 Carnhope Irrigation District 7 495 31 0 Central Pre Mix - Sullivan Rd 4 4 0 City Of Spokane" 59700" 0 Not reported Consolidated Irrig Dist 19 System 1 3349 196 2,750,000 Consolidated Irrig Dist 19 System 2 5168 125 2,200,000 East Spokane Water Dist 1 1700 94 1,277,000 Hutchinson Irrigation Dist #16 790 0 1,200,000 Honeywell Electronic Mfg LLC 0 1 0 Irvin Water District #6 1597 154 1,900,000 2 21,200 6 550,000 824 1,500,000 4 1 0 Kaiser Alum - Trentwood Works Model Irrigation Dist #18 Modern Electric Water Co Orchard Avenue Irrigation Dist 6 0 2518 7424 1255 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 17 of 61 Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.7 Spokane Valley Water Purveyors - Group A Systems Current Residential Current Non Residential Storage Group A Systems Connections Connections Capacity (gallons) Pinecroft Mobile Home Park Puerta Vallarta 143 0 0 1 2 400 0 Spitfire Pub And Eatery 0 87 Spokane Business & Industrial Park 0 252 478,000 200 Spokane Co - Mirabeau Park 0 2 Spokane Co Water Dist #3 9788 426 6,880,000 Trentwood Irrigation District 3 1727 162 1,120,000 Vera Water & Power 9259 390 8,650,000 Woodland Park Trailer Court 30 0 0 * Approximately 620 connections within City of Spokane Valley Source: Washington State Department of Health Table 4.8 Group B Systems Group B System Connections Holiday Trailer Court 12 Janzen & Janzen 1 Levernier Const. Water System 1 Mercer Trucking Co Inc 1 Middco Tool & Equipment 1 Systems Transport Inc 1 Tci Water System 6 Tds 2 Union Pacific Railroad - Trentwood 1 Westco S Apparel Service 3 Western Structures Inc 2 WSDT -Pines Road Maintenance 1 Source: Washington State Department of Health Level of Service The Countywide Planning Policies were amended in 2004 to defer level of service standards for water supply and fire flow to the requirements of the Department of Health and local fire codes respectively. Forecast of Future Needs Spokane Valley adopts by reference water system plans for all water purveyors providing service within the City of Spokane Valley. Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 18 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Spokane Valley adopts by reference water system plans for all water purveyors providing service within the City of Spokane Valley. Capital Projects and Financing Plan Spokane Valley adopts by reference capital project and financing plans for all water purveyors providing service within the City of Spokane Valley. Fire Protection and Emergency Medical Service Fire protection and emergency medical services (EMS) are provided by Spokane Valley Fire Department (SVFD) and Spokane County Fire District No. 8. SVFD serves over 90% of the Valley, while District 8 serves a few small areas in the southern part of the City (see Fire Districts Map at the end of this chapter). Both districts serve the City with a full range of fire suppression and EMS services. Spokane Valley voters chose to annex into SVFD and District No. 8 in September, 2004. Insurance Rating Fire departments are assigned a numerical fire protection rating by the Washington Surveying and Ratings Bureau. Insurance companies fund the Bureau to perform on -site inspections of fire districts to determine the rating. The Bureau analyzes five main areas: average response time, water supply, communication network, schedule of fire inspections and fire station evaluations (which focus on age of vehicles), personnel training and staffing of facilities. Insurance companies use the fire protection rating to help determine insurance rates on all fire insurance policies. The rating is on a scale of one to ten, with one representing the best score. Quality of fire service can have a significant impact on fire insurance rates, particularly for commercial businesses. SVFD has a Fire Insurance Rating of three (3) and District No. 8 has a Rating of five (5), both indicating excellent fire protection services. Inventory of Existing Facilities and Apparatus The Fire Districts Map shows the location of fire stations and service area boundaries for SVFD, District No. 8 and surrounding fire protection districts. All fire agencies have mutual aid agreements to assist each other in major emergencies. SVFD 2011 apparatus inventory includes 10 Type I Engines, 3 Type II Engines, 3 Class A pumper /ladders, three brush trucks and other miscellaneous vehicles for staff, training, rescue, maintenance, prevention and command. SVFD has ten stations, including seven within the City of Spokane Valley. Locations of the stations are as follows: Table 4.9 Spokane Valley Fire Department Station Locations Station 1` 10319 East Sprague Station 2 9111 E Frederick Station 3 1 2218 North Harvard Station 4 1 22406 East Wellesley Station 5 15510 East Marietta Station 6" 6306 East Sprague Station 7* 1121 South Evergreen Station 8" North 2110 Wilbur Station 9" East 12121 32nd Greenacres Station" East 17217 Sprague Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 19 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.9 Spokane Valley Fire Department Station Locations Inside Spokane Valley City Limits Fire District No. 8 has one fire station inside the City limits, station 84 in the Ponderosa neighborhood, located at 4410 South Bates. The District has two stations located outside the City limits providing additional coverage, No. 81 at 6117 South Palouse Highway and No. 85 at 3324 South Linke Road. Stations 81 and 84 each have two Class A engines and two wild land brush engines. Station 85 has one Class A engine and one wild land brush engine. Level of Service The Level of Service goals for response time are described in SFVD's Standard of Cover. SVFD's Standard of Cover is consistent with the regionally adopted minimum level of service for fire protection and emergency services. The following table shows the number of calls per year. Table 4.10 Spokane Valley Fire Department City Responses Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 City Responses 8,270 9,144 10,080 9,480 9,394 9.663 10,141 The Countywide Planning Policies for Spokane County establishes minimum levels of service for fire and emergency medical services as follows: Urban areas are required to be serviced by a Fire District with at least a Class Six Insurance rating. • Urban areas must be within five road miles of an operating fire station that provides service with a "Class A" pumper, unless structures are equipped with fire sprinklers. • Urban areas shall be served by a state certified basic life support (BLS) agency within five miles and an operating advanced life support unit within six miles or ten minutes response time. Both SVFD and 8 meet the minimum countywide level of service standards. Forecast of Future Needs The northeast area of the City is underdeveloped at present but as the City grows over the next ten to fifteen years, SVFD recognizes that a new station will need to be constructed to provide an adequate level of service. Station 11 will be constructed at Barker and Euclid. Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities Station No. 11 will be located in the vicinity of Barker and Euclid and will have 3 bays with fire apparatus. Construction for Station 11 is tentatively planned for 2016 or when growth in the area will support the investment and ongoing costs. Capital Projects and Financing Plan SVFD is a junior taxing district and supplements its regular taxes with special levies. As the restrictions on the taxes generated from the regular tax go down, special levies are proposed to maintain needed funding. Special levies must be approved by voters served by SVFD. The Department does not use its bonding capacity to fund capital projects. The Department's philosophy is to reserve funds generated through its regular revenues for future capital needs. The following table represents SVFD planned capital expenditures. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 20 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.11 SVFD Capital Projects Plan Project 20132 20143 20154 20165 20175 20187 Total c.e noRt.ro .+ N.A. a {2222!.!- $4-68 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1 $0 $0 $1,800 $0 $4-,00 1 $0 $1,800 !2!!2p1 Fire Station No. 11 (New construction) $0 T8ta4 $4 9, $0 $0 $0 $1,809 $0 Amounts are times $1,000 4.4.9 Library Service Library services are proviaea oy the Spokane county Library District, Spokane County Library District is a municipal corporation established by voters in 1942 under provisions of RCW 27.12.040. An independent special purpose district, SCLD's sole purpose is to provide public library services to the unincorporated county and affiliated municipalities. A f' a member Board of Tr stees a ointed b S okane Iy - u pp I y p County Commissioners governs the District. A Board - appointed library director serves as chief administrator. Inventory of Existing Facilities Spokane Valley has one library located inside its boundary, the District's Valley Branch, located at 12004 East Main. This resource library is the District's largest facility, measuring 22,950 square feet, including branch administrative space. The District has two other libraries within the greater Valley area located at 4322 North Argonne and 22324 East Wellesley in Otis Orchards. As of n ^January 2013, approximately 33,00036,000 Spokane Valley residents were Library District cardholders. Valley Library was the primary branch of registration, with Argonne second and Otis Orchards third. Spokane County Library District has a reciprocal borrowing agreement with the City of Spokane with over 4- 500 -1,600 Spokane Valley residents having a Spokane Public Library card. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 21 of 61 Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities VALLEY o E Broadway AV Valwy Bran E S re un A .a rc rc rc a w E 19th Au m Iy - u pp I y p County Commissioners governs the District. A Board - appointed library director serves as chief administrator. Inventory of Existing Facilities Spokane Valley has one library located inside its boundary, the District's Valley Branch, located at 12004 East Main. This resource library is the District's largest facility, measuring 22,950 square feet, including branch administrative space. The District has two other libraries within the greater Valley area located at 4322 North Argonne and 22324 East Wellesley in Otis Orchards. As of n ^January 2013, approximately 33,00036,000 Spokane Valley residents were Library District cardholders. Valley Library was the primary branch of registration, with Argonne second and Otis Orchards third. Spokane County Library District has a reciprocal borrowing agreement with the City of Spokane with over 4- 500 -1,600 Spokane Valley residents having a Spokane Public Library card. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 21 of 61 Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4-12 Spokane County Library rlistrint rbix Capital Dreients and Cinanninn Plan year (Assumes a 9044 bend issue approval) P rojeGt 2012 2013 4 2014 2015 201 A 2017 dal Valley zTibFary I i W 7ro W $20G $$$2,450 �leM., Cep nth Val Iev 1%9 � � � II11 a*9 �q�I1I1 $i,� ��,��I1 $2,459 RA venue Cn r1'ctroGt F, nds mr $i,599 mn �n mn Q� Cnn Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 22 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan G9 RQPdR $8 $9 $999 $7,,590 $9,939 $2,459 $29,669 Tetal $9 $1,599 $$99 $7,,539 $9,834 $2,459 $22,160 * These expepses are remmbl-,Fsable &Q- M „efe. e ,@d b9pd f-Rds Imb Farmes . Als the I—FIN.4 R 01.6 updated, this Gapital FaGilitiGIS RIA-A V.9011 be A-rAR- A d-R- d- tA- iRGGFPGFatG IFA —Dog-trOC-,t fluAd—ing levels of 50 Gents per $1,000 of assessed valuation. Library Facility Master Plan The Spokane County Library District currently provides library services to the residents of Spokane Valley primarily from a 22,950 SF library. The Spokane Valley Library was built in 1955 and expanded in 1986. The Spokane Valley Library is one of the busiest libraries in Washington. In March 2008, voters defeated a proposal to establish a proposed Greater Spokane Valley Library Capital Facility area and to issue General Obligation Bonds for construction of a new main library and a new neighborhood branch in the eastern area of the City. The District subsequently undertook a capital facilities planning process for its entire service area, resulting in the July 2010 Board of Trustees approval of a 20 -year Library Facilities Master Plan (LFMP). The LFMP proposed a capital investment totaling $50.8 million (2010 dollars). In 2013, the Board of Trustees approved a Strategic Plan to guide allocation of resources to support programs and services that are responsive to community needs. The Plan is based upon community conversations held in every library facility along with interviews with individuals actively engaged in the community. The plan identified four service response priorities for the next three to five years. • Create Young Learners • Support Job Seekers & Local Businesses • Inspire people of all ages to discover plan and learn • Connect Community As part of the planning process the Board of Trustees took a fresh look at the LFMP. They recognized that the changing role of public libraries and the current economic environment required a critical evaluation of all future building projects. New facilities will support early learning, workforce development, creative learning and community connections by being open, flexible spaces that adapt to changing roles and emerging services. With the increasing use of digital content and the emerging role of library as a place to gather, meet and exchange information, the Physical library is an information commons as well as community knowledge center. Future Facilities for the City of Spokane Valley The existing Spokane Valley Library has served residents of the valley for nearly 60 years. The split design is not efficient and the layout does not meet current needs. In 2012, the District entered into an agreement with the City of Spokane Valley to purchase 8 acres on Sprague between Farr and University adjacent to Balfour Park. A jointly funded site plan that will include a one story 30,000 SF library placed within a City park was initiated in 2013. The goal is to develop a park with amenities to enhance the library experience and create a welcoming civic destination. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 23 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan The District also owns property south of Spraque alonq Conklin Road and intends to build a 12,000- 15,000 SF library. The buildinq will offer an open, flexible floor plan providing meeting rooms, study rooms, children's learninq areas, information commons and space to browse library materials. The combined square footage for library facilities in the City of Spokane Valley is planned to be between 42,000- 45,000 SF. The agreement with the City of Spokane Valley allows the District up to five years to begin building on the Sprague property. The Board of Trustees is currently evaluating the possibility of putting a proposal before the voters in 2014 to fund the capital investment in two libraries that will be built within the City of Spokane Valley. If successful, the District would break ground in 2015 on the first building and shortly after on the second. Operational Costs The Library District anticipates that efficient building design and continuing staff productivity improvements, a larger Spokane Valley Library and an eventual new branch can be operated at normal District funding levels of 50 cents per $1,000 of assessed valuation. 4.4.10 Parks and Recreation Spokane Valley has a wide range of recreational opportunities available to residents and visitors. City parks, school play fields, golf courses, trails, County parks and conservations areas are all within close vicinity to Spokane Valley residents. The City provides a system of local parks that is managed by the Spokane Valley Parks and Recreation Department. The Parks Department is in the process of developing a new Parks, Recreation, and Open Spaces Master Plan. When finished, this plan will offer a detailed picture of the park, recreation and open space system, including changes and improvements that will be made in the future. This section of the Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) provides summaries of the parks inventory, level of service (LOS), future park needs, proposed projects, and a financing plan for the next six years. Park Types Parks are classified by their size, service area and function. Spokane Valley uses the nationally recognized Park, Recreation, Open Space and Greenway Guidelines, to establish standard for parks planning. Major classifications include mini -park, neighborhood, school -park, community, large urban, various trail designations and special use facilities. The Parks Element, Chapter 9, provides a thorough description of park types used for planning purposes. Inventory of Existing Facilities The Parks Map, found at the end of this Chapter, shows the location of all parks within Spokane Valley. Table 4.13 provides an inventory of park and recreation facilities owned by Spokane Valley. These parks are used to calculate Spokane Valley's level of service for parks. The Parks Master Plan provides the most detailed inventory of parks, including equipment, structures and other miscellaneous park facilities. Table 4.13 Spokane Valley Park Facilities Spokane Valley Parks Acreage Status Neighborhood Parks Balfour Park 2.86 Developed Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 24 of 61 Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.13 Spokane Valley Park Facilities Spokane Valley Parks Acreage Status Browns Park Castle Park Edgecliff Park Greenacres Park Terrace View Park 8.03 2.71 Developed Minimally Developed 4.74 Developed Developed Developed 8.3 9.24 Subtotal Community Parks Valley Mission Park 35.88 Developed 21.91 Subtotal 21.91 Large Urban Parks Mirabeau Point Park 41.91 Developed Subtotal 41.91 Special Use Areas Park Road Pool 2.00 Developed Sullivan Park 16.07 Developed CenterPlace 13.60 Developed Subtotal 31.67 Undeveloped Park Land Myrtle Point Park 31.07 Undeveloped Valley Mission Park (South) 7.22 Undeveloped Valley Senior Center 2.09 Undeveloped Subtotal 40.38 Total Park Acres 171.75 Level of Service The Countywide Planning Policies for Spokane County requires all jurisdictions to adopt a level of service (LOS) standard for parks. Spokane Valley has the flexibility and freedom to adopt a LOS standard for parks that reflects the expressed .", need and desire of our community. a'.I• The National Recreation and Parks Association suggest that cities adopt LOS standards for different park types, such as mini (pocket), neighborhood, community and major parks. Spokane Valley does not have a well - developed park system and will use total City -owned park acres for its LOS measurement. In 2006, Spokane Valley adopted a LOS of 1.92 acres /1000 people as its minimum LOS standard. Spokane Valley recognizes that schools, churches, natural areas and commercial Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 25 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan enterprises all provide recreation opportunities for Spokane Valley residents. These will all be taken into consideration when Spokane Valley determines the best location to purchase new park land. Forecast of Future Needs Spokane Valley has the capacity to accommodate an additional 16,49315,118 people over the next 20 years within the current City limits. In order to maintain the adopted LOS of 1.92 acres /1000 people, Spokane Valley would have to add about X31 acres of park land over the next 20 years, with 4-3-11 acres in the first six years, as shown in Table 4.15. The Parks Master Plan provides a more detailed analysis of park and recreation needs by dividing the City into smaller service areas. Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities In order to maintain the adopted 1.92 acres /1000 level of service standard, Spokane Valley would need to add 4-3-11 acres of park land by the year :20172019. Capital Projects and Financing Plan The following table details Spokane Valley's six year Parks and Recreation capital improvement financing plan. The table details projects that address level of service deficiencies (capacity projects) and other capital improvements (non- capacity) projects. Table 4.17 Parks Capital Facilities Plan Note: Amounts in $1,000 Project 20132 20143 20154 20165 20175 Table 4.15 Future Park Demand Total Park Improvements Total $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 Total Park Acres Acres Required at $100 Year 1 Population Available 1.92 acres /1000 Net Deficiency Acres 29422013 90,448550 171.75 173.5486 42.11 2082019 95,3933332 171.75 182.483.04 11.2329 29322033 106935,668 171.75 204:682.88 32-9331.13 *Assumes 20 -year growth of 459315.118 people $50 Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities In order to maintain the adopted 1.92 acres /1000 level of service standard, Spokane Valley would need to add 4-3-11 acres of park land by the year :20172019. Capital Projects and Financing Plan The following table details Spokane Valley's six year Parks and Recreation capital improvement financing plan. The table details projects that address level of service deficiencies (capacity projects) and other capital improvements (non- capacity) projects. Table 4.17 Parks Capital Facilities Plan Note: Amounts in $1,000 Project 20132 20143 20154 20165 20175 20187 Total Park Improvements Total $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $600 $100 $100 $600 Revenue Source General Fund $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $300 REET #1 $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $300 Grants 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total $100 $100 1 $100 1 $100 1 $100 1 $100 1 $600 4.4.11 Public Safety Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 26 of 61 Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan The Spokane Valley Police Department is a contract law enforcement agency, partnering with the Spokane County Sheriffs Department to provide a safe environment for the citizens, businesses, and visitors of the City of Spokane Valley. This unique contracting relationship allows for the sharing of many of our resources, allowing both agencies to operate at peak efficiency without duplicating services. Spokane Valley also contracts with Spokane County for judicial, jail and animal control services. The total contract for public safety for 2011 totaled over $$15.3 million, including approximately 100 commissioned police officers. Spokane Valley supports community oriented policing and recognizes it as an important complement to traditional law enforcement. In Spokane County, community policing is known as S.C.O.P.E., or Sheriff Community Oriented Policing Effort. The community policing model balances reactive responses to calls for service with proactive problem - solving centered on the causes of crime and disorder. Community policing requires police and citizens to join together as partners in the course of both identifying and effectively addressing these issues. About 364 Spokane Valley citizens are S.C.O.P.E volunteers. Community Survey The Community Preference Survey included questions to gauge the public's perception of police services. Results show that 85% of Spokane Valley residents believe police services are good, very good, or excellent, indicating a generally high level of confidence in the police force. Only 27% of respondents expressed a willingness to pay additional taxes to have improved police services. Inventory of Existing Facilities The Spokane Valley Police Precinct is located at 12710 E. Sprague and houses patrol and detective divisions, the traffic unit and administrative staff. The Precinct also includes a Spokane County District Court. Spokane Valley is served by four S.C.O.P.E. stations, shown in the following table. Table 4.18 Spokane Valley S.C.O.P.E stations Neighborhood Location Neighborhood Location University 10621 East 15 Trentwood 2400 N. Wilbur # 79 Edgecliff 522 S. Thierman Rd. Central Valley 115 N. Evergreen Rd. Level of Service Public safety is a priority for the City of Spokane Valley. It is difficult to determine at this time, an adequate and measurable level of police protection. Spokane Valley will monitor the performance of the Spokane County Sheriff's Department and will adjust the contract for services as necessary to ensure an adequate level of police protection. Forecast of Future Needs Future needs for police protection will be determined as a part of the annual budget process. Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities Spokane Valley is not planning to construct any new law enforcement facilities at this time. Capital Projects and Financing Plan Spokane Valley is not planning to construct any new law enforcement facilities at this time. 4.4.12 School Facilities Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 27 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Four public school districts provide service within Spokane Valley: East Valley, West Valley, Central Valley and Spokane School District 81. Spokane Valley must coordinate with each district to ensure consistency between the City's plan and school districts' plans. There are also a number of private schools that provide service to Spokane Valley area children. Inventory of Existing Facilities The School District Map, found at the end of this Chapter, shows district boundaries and locations of all public schools within Spokane Valley. Tables 4.19 through 4.21 shows capacities of all schools located within Spokane Valley. School districts use portable classrooms at some school sites as interim measures to house students until permanent facilities can be built. Portable units are not included in capacity figures. School capacity figures are reported by the Washington State Superintendent of Public Instruction and are based on square footage per student. Table 4.19 Central Valley School Inventory Elementary School Sq. Ft. Area Capacity Adams Summit (Formerly Blake) Broadway Chester 46,879 521 436 499 480 34,823 40,648 38,388 Greenacres 55,875 680 Keystone 33,669 421 Liberty Lake 60,477 756 McDonald 46,504 563 Opportunity 42,388 521 Ponderosa 51,377 642 Progress 37,573 452 South Pines Sunrise 45,956 499 662 455 7,587 53,673 University Total Elementary Permanent Facilities 37,867 626,097 Junior High Schools Sq. Ft. Area Capacity Bowdish Evergreen 74,738 743 751 76,075 Greenacres 91,803 908 Horizon 84,795 838 1,044 4,284 North Pines 105,368 Total Junior High Permanent Facilities 432,779 Senior High Schools Sq. Ft. Area Capacity Central Valley 239,540 11988 University 239,540 1,986 Total Senior High Facilities 479,080 3,974 Source: Central Valley School District Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 28 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.20 East Valley School Inventory Elementary School Sq. Ft. Area Capacity East Farms Otis Orchards 47,047 51,789 579 629 Skyview Trent Trentwood Total Elementary Permanent Facilities 42,140 509 713 573 3,003 58,482 47,274 246,732 Junior High Schools Sq. Ft. Area Capacity East Valley Mountain View Total Junior High Permanent Facilities 84,561 82,544 167,105 831 816 1,647 Senior High Schools I Sq. Ft. Area Capacity East Valley Total Senior High Facilities 203,248 203,248 1,686 1, 686 Source: Washington State Superintendent of Public Instruction 89,870 Table 4.21 West Valley School Inventory Elementary School Sq. Ft. Area Capacity Millwood Early Childhood Ctr. 27,164 340 Ness 33,440 418 Orchard Center 34,094 426 Pasadena Park 34,002 425 Seth Woodward 35,941 449 Total Elementary Permanent Facilities 164,641 2,058 Middle Schools Sq. Ft. Area Capacity Centennial 89,870 875 West Valley City School 30,258 307 Total Junior High Permanent Facilities 120,128 1,182 Senior High Schools Sq. Ft. Area Capacity West Valley 149,128 1,207 Spokane Valley 13,902 116 Total Senior High Facilities 163,030 1,323 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 29 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Source: West Valley School District Level of Service The Countywide Planning Policies for Spokane County requires that all jurisdictions adopt a Level of Service standard for schools. Spokane Valley defers this responsibility to the individual school districts providing service within the City. Individual school districts may request that Spokane Valley adopt a Level of Service standard in future updates to the Capital Facilities Element. Forecast of Future Needs Central Valley School District The Central Valley School District (CVSD) is experiencing a period of high growth in student population, particularly towards its eastern boundary. Liberty Lake and Greenacres Elementary Schools are currently over capacity. In response to this growth, the District initiated its "Community Linkages" planning process in the fall of 2004 to develop strategies and alternatives for accommodating its present and future students. The committee developed student population projections through the 2008/2009 school year for the entire district by analyzing growth trends in student population, building permit activity and proposed housing developments. The data will be used to guide decisions on where to locate school facilities. Table 4.23 shows the number of students enrolled in Central Valley Schools in 2005 for each school in the District and projections through the 2008 -09 school year. In 2005, 11,480 students were enrolled in CVSD schools, with 9,363 of those students living within the City of Spokane Valley. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 30 of 61 Table 4.23 Central Valley Enrollment Projection School Attendance Area Student Enrollment 2005 New Projected Student Enrollment in 2008 -2009 Student Increase Elementary Schools Broadway Progress 517 25 20 27 492 291 311 Opportunity 339 366 Adams 466 503 37 16 University 419 435 South Pines 331 332 1 McDonald 356 364 8 Sunrise 490 532 337 352 686 42 3 30 98 Ponderosa 334 Chester 322 Greenacres 588 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 30 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan The following table shows enrollment projections for Central Valley School District from the Washington State Superintendent of Public Instruction. The table provides historic and projected school enrollments for the years 2001 through 2010. Table 4.24 Central Valley School Enrollment Actual Enrollment Projected Enrollment Table 4.23 Central Valley Enrollment Projection School Attendance Area Student Enrollment 2005 New Projected Student Enrollment in 2008 -2009 Student Increase Liberty Lake 727 876 149 Total 5155 5611 456 Middle Schools North Pines 525 551 26 Bowdish 574 589 15 Horizon 440 462 22 Evergreen 578 630 52 Greenacres 644 757 113 Total 2761 2989 228 High Schools 1922 1642 2055 1804 133 University High Central Valley High 162 Total 3564 3859 295 Total Student Enrollment 11,480 12,459 979 Source: Central Valley Linkages Committee - John Bottelli, Spokane County GIS The following table shows enrollment projections for Central Valley School District from the Washington State Superintendent of Public Instruction. The table provides historic and projected school enrollments for the years 2001 through 2010. Table 4.24 Central Valley School Enrollment Actual Enrollment Projected Enrollment Grade 2001 2002 2003 2004 K -6 51873 5,817 5,965 6,272 7 -8 1,800 1,823 1,819 1,817 9-12 31410 3,544 3,555 3,602 KK- 1211,083 11,184 11,339 11,691 2005 1 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 7,985 6,433 6,686 6,980 7,332 7,697 1,899 1,942 1,900 1,897 1,926 2,090 3,862 3,653 3,695 3,788 3,789 3,828 11,985 12,323 12,668 13,018 13,451 13,937 Source: Washington State Superintendent of Public Instruction East Vallev School District East Valley School District has experienced a significant decline in enrollment in recent years. In 1999, enrollment peaked at just under 4,700 students down to 4,355 students enrolled in the fall of 2004. The following table indicates that East Valley will continue to lose students through the year 2010. Table 4.25 East Valley School Enrollment Actual Enrollment Projected Enrollment Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 31 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan K -6 2,355 2,288 2,167 2,139 I 2,082 2,022 1,974 1 1,964 1,931 1,917 7-8 743 735 732 716 690 681 659 599 572 564 9 -12 1,592 1,565 1,544 1,500 1,610 1,632 1,710 1,728 1,750 1,217 1,396 1,354 1,322 1,337 1,292 K -12 4,690 4,588 4,443 4,355 ' 4,168 4,057 3,955 3,900 3,795 3,698 Source: Washington State Superintendent of Public Instruction East Valley School District estimates that out of 4,240 total students enrolled in the District in September, 2005, 2,378 lived within the City of Spokane Valley. West Valley School District West Valley School District has grown in student population consistently since 1998 and is projected to continuing growing through the year 2010, as shown in Table 4.25. Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities Central Valley School District The most urgent need for the CVSD is to add more elementary classroom space in the east end of the District. The District recently acquired two properties in the north Greenacres area for a new elementary school. The District will need to construct a new high school and middle school in the 20 -year time frame of this comprehensive plan. The district has a site for a middle school adjacent to the Liberty Lake Elementary School. A number of elementary schools need to be completely remodeled, including Opportunity, Greenacres and Ponderosa. East Valley School District East Valley is not planning to construct any new facilities within the six year time frame of this capital facilities plan. Future updates to this plan will incorporate new capital projects. West Valley School District West Valley is remodeling its High School and will add elementary school classroom space. Capital Projects and Financing Plan West Valley School District passed a $35 million bond measure in 2004 that is being used to remodel West Valley High School, construct new elementary school classrooms and a new gymnasium. Central Valley School District is in the process of developing a Capital Improvement and Financing Plan. 4.4.13 Sewer Service Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 32 of 61 Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Table 4.26 West Valley School Enrollment Actual Enrollment Projected Enrollment Grade K-6 7-8 9-12 K -12 2001 1,591 545 1,469 V 3,605 2002 1,552 566 1,502 i i 3,620 2003 1,614 575 1,503 3,692 2004 1,581 528 1,534 3,643 1 2005 1,605 542 1,510 3,6578 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 1,610 1,632 1,710 1,728 1,750 560 567 503 519 589 1,493 3,832 1,538 1,554 3,7532 1,559 1,576 3,823 Source: Washington State Superintendent of Public Instruction Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities Central Valley School District The most urgent need for the CVSD is to add more elementary classroom space in the east end of the District. The District recently acquired two properties in the north Greenacres area for a new elementary school. The District will need to construct a new high school and middle school in the 20 -year time frame of this comprehensive plan. The district has a site for a middle school adjacent to the Liberty Lake Elementary School. A number of elementary schools need to be completely remodeled, including Opportunity, Greenacres and Ponderosa. East Valley School District East Valley is not planning to construct any new facilities within the six year time frame of this capital facilities plan. Future updates to this plan will incorporate new capital projects. West Valley School District West Valley is remodeling its High School and will add elementary school classroom space. Capital Projects and Financing Plan West Valley School District passed a $35 million bond measure in 2004 that is being used to remodel West Valley High School, construct new elementary school classrooms and a new gymnasium. Central Valley School District is in the process of developing a Capital Improvement and Financing Plan. 4.4.13 Sewer Service Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 32 of 61 Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Background In 1980, Spokane County initiated the Septic Tank Elimination Program (STEP) to bring sewers to houses and businesses located in the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA). Since that time, approximately 25,000 residences and businesses in the greater Spokane Valley area have been connected to the County's sewer system. The STEP will be completed in 2012. Residences and businesses with sewer available will be required to connect to the public sewer system by 2015. Upon incorporation, the City of Spokane Valley entered into an interlocal agreement giving Spokane County lead agency authority to provide sewer service. In 2009 another interlocal agreement was adopted which established a wastewater management advisory board and gave Spokane County the exclusive authority to provide sewer service to the City of Spokane Valley. Comprehensive Wastewater Management Plan In 1996, the County adopted the 1996 Comprehensive Wastewater Management Plan Update (1996 CWMP). The intent of the 1996 CWMP was to develop strategies to expedite the sewer program for protection of the Aquifer, and to satisfy regulations established by the Washington State Departments of Health (DOH) and Ecology (DOE) and the Spokane County Health District. In 2001, Spokane County again updated the CWMP, which focused on reprioritizing the remaining STEP projects under an accelerated construction schedule, policy updates, and addressing conformance with the requirements of the Growth Management Act (GMA). Most significantly, the CWMP updated population and wastewater flow forecasts and produced a revised Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Spokane County will update the CWMP in 2012. Spokane Valley adopts by reference the most current CWMP. Wastewater Facilities Plan Spokane County adopted a Wastewater Facilities Plan (WFP) in 2002 that identified wastewater facilities and programs required to meet the long -term wastewater treatment needs of the County. The WFP focuses on developing a long -term wastewater management strategy for the County. The WFP provides an in -depth analysis of various wastewater treatment technologies available, in addition to exploring the wide range of related environmental considerations. Public participation was fully integrated into this extensive planning effort. The WFP was updated in 2006, 2007. It was approved by the Department of Ecology in 2008. The Plan was again updated in 2010. This Plan is in its implementation phase, with the recent completion and start -up of a new regional water reclamation facility. Spokane Valley adopts by reference the most current WFP. Wastewater Treatment In 1980, Spokane County and the City of Spokane signed an interlocal agreement wherein the County agreed to purchase ten million gallons per day (mgd) of capacity in the City's Riverside Park Water Reclamation Facility (RPWRF). Spokane County is currently using approximately 3 MGD of this capacity, as a result of the new Spokane County Regional Water Reclamation Facility (SCRWRF) coming on line recently. Wastewater from the City of Spokane Valley is now conveyed through Spokane County's sewer system to the recently completed SCRWRF. This facility is at the old Stockyards site north of 1 -90 and east of Freya. The SCRWRF has a capacity of 8 million gallons per day (MGD) and produces effluent meeting Class A Reclaimed Water Standards prior to discharge into the Spokane River. In the future, when the flow from the Spokane Valley area exceeds 8 MGD, the additional flow will be directed to the City of Spokane Riverside Park Water Reclamation Facility (RPWRF) for treatment and discharge into the Spokane River, until the capacity of the SCRWRF is expanded. The site will support expansion of the SCRWRF up to 24 MGD in 4 MGD increments. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 33 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan The SCRWRF was designed and constructed by CH2M Hill, pursuant to a "Design- Build- Operate" contract with Spokane County. The contract provides for up to 20 years of facility operation by CH2M Hill. Inventory of Existing Facilities Sewer facilities within Spokane Valley are a system of pipes and pumping stations that move untreated sewage to two main interceptor lines. The interceptors are known as the Spokane Valley Interceptor (SVI) and North Valley Interceptor (NVI). These interceptors then convey the sewage to the County's SCRWRF through pumping stations or to the City's RPWRF by gravity flow. Major elements are summarized as follows: Interceptor Sewers: 32 Miles Collector Lines: 455 Miles Level of Service Major Pump Stations: 6 Local Pump Stations: 10 The Regional Minimum Level of Service Standards state that incorporated areas will be provided with wastewater collection and transport systems in accordance with the adopted sewer concurrency requirements of the jurisdiction. Spokane Valley requires all new development to be served with public sewer. Only existing residential, commercial and industrial lots may be served by septic systems /drain fields (approved by the Spokane County Health District) and only if public sewer is unavailable. Forecast of Future Needs Spokane County currently has about 37,500 customers within its sewer system area. Since some customers generate more flow than others, it is common to define an Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) as a way to project future flows and to set the sewer service rates. Spokane County assigns one ERU to each 800 cubic feet of water use per month, or about 200 gallons per day. The 37,500 customers account for about 52,900 ERU's, based on an average of 1.41 ERU's per account. The following table shows that there are about 24,800 accounts within the City of Spokane Valley, representing approximately 71 % of the County's total ERU's. Note that the number of accounts in the next three years is expected to increase substantially, due to the County's continuing emphasis on the enforcement of sewer connection deadlines within the Septic Tank Elimination Program areas. Anticipated growth in the number of accounts for the Spokane County sewer system overall is reflected by the following projections: Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 34 of 61 Table 4.30 Current Spokane County Sewer Customers and ERU's Customer Type City of Spokane Other County Service Total for County Valley Areas Service Areas Accounts ERU's Accounts ERU's Accounts ERU's Single Family 20,860 20,860 11,820 11,820 32,680 32,680 Duplex and 2,160 9,220 610 2,290 2,770 11,510 Multi - Family Commercial 1,767 7,210 270 1,230 2,037 8,440 Mobile Home 13 270 0 0 13 270 Parks TOTAL 24,800 37,560 12,700 15,340 37,500 52,900 Source: Spokane County Utilities Department Note that the number of accounts in the next three years is expected to increase substantially, due to the County's continuing emphasis on the enforcement of sewer connection deadlines within the Septic Tank Elimination Program areas. Anticipated growth in the number of accounts for the Spokane County sewer system overall is reflected by the following projections: Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 34 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan YEAR No. of Accounts No. of ERUs 2012 38,900 54,800 2013 40,500 57,100 2014 42,100 59,400 Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities Sewer Construction The County's Septic Tank Elimination Program (STEP) will be completed in the late spring of 2012. The purpose of the STEP is to expedite the construction of sanitary sewers and dramatically reduce the number of on -site sewage treatment facilities over the Spokane - Rathdrum Aquifer; and to satisfy regulations established by the State Departments of Heath and Ecology, Spokane County Health District and other regulatory agencies. The Sewer Projects Map found at the end of this chapter shows the areas where sewer has been extended as a part of the STEP program. The industrial area in the far northeast corner of the City currently does not have public sewer service. To encourage economic development and job creation, Spokane Valley may consider projects that would extend public sewer to this area. New Wastewater Treatment Plant The Spokane County Water Reclamation Facility (SCRWRF) was completed in 2011. The new plant has a current capacity of 8 MGD. It is projected that this capacity will last until approximately 2030. Additional phases will likely be made in 4 MGD increments. The SCRWRF site can be expanded to 24 MGD to accommodate up to 50 -years of anticipated future growth. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 35 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Capital Projects and Financing Plan Wastewater Treatment Spokane County has programmed capital expenditures for its share of upgrading the City of Spokane Riverside Park Water Reclamation Facility (RPWRF) for the years 2011 -2016, per the Six - Year Sewer Construction Capital Improvement Program. The upgrades must be undertaken to meet State and Federal effluent quality requirements. In 2011, Spokane County completed Phase 1 of the SCRWRF at a cost of $173 million. Phase 2 is estimated at $42 million (in 2011 dollars) for an additional 4 MGD of capacity. Spokane Valley adopts by reference the most current Spokane County Six -Year Sewer Construction Capital Improvement Program. Sewer Construction The Sewer Projects Map, as presented in the County's Six -Year Sewer Construction Capital Improvement Program, shows the location of the sewer projects planned in the Spokane Valley, both inside and outside the City boundary. Note that no specific new projects are currently planned, due to the completion of the Septic Tank Elimination Program in early 2012. Spokane Valley will continue to support the replacement of septic systems with public sewers and will consider the feasibility of extending public sewer to currently un- served commercial and industrial areas to encourage economic development and job creation. 4.4.14 Solid Waste In 1988, the intergovernmental agency known as the Spokane Regional Solid Waste System (System) was formed by interlocal agreement between the City of Spokane, Spokane County and all other cities and towns within the County. The System is responsible for implementing solid waste management plans, planning and developing specific waste management programs and updating solid waste plans for the entire County. The System is managed by the City of Spokane, which uses its structure to carry out the various solid waste management programs for our region. In Spokane Valley, solid waste services are provided by private haulers licensed by the Washington Utility and Transportation Commission (W.U.T.C.) through franchise agreements. Waste Management of Spokane provides residential and commercial garbage services and weekly curbside recycling collection; Sunshine Disposal provides only commercial services. At this time, Spokane Valley residents are allowed to self -haul their garbage to an appropriate dumping site. Inventory of Existing Facilities The Regional Solid Waste System includes a Waste to Energy facility located at 2900 South Geiger, and two recycling /transfer stations. One of the stations is located within Spokane Valley at 3941 N. Sullivan Road south of Trent and across from the Spokane Industrial Park; the other is located in north Spokane County at the intersection of Elk - Chattaroy Road and Highway 2. Landfills are necessary to provide disposal for solid waste that cannot be recycled or incinerated, or that exceeds the capacity of the WTE Facility. The Spokane County Regional Health District licenses six privately owned landfills in Spokane County. Level of Service The minimum Regional Level of Service Standards requires solid waste services to meet all State and Federal regulations. Forecast of Future Needs Spokane Valley is participating on the update of the Spokane County Waste Management Plan ( SCWMP). The SCWMP update process will determine future needs for solid waste disposal. Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 36 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan The updated Spokane County Solid Waste Management Plan will provide information on future regional solid waste facilities. Finance Plan The updated Spokane County Solid Waste Management plan will include a financing plan for future regional solid waste facilities. 4.4.15 Stormwater Facilities Stormwater runoff in Spokane Valley flows to a combination of public and private facilities. In developed areas, runoff infiltrates into the ground or flows to drywells in public road rights -of -way, drywells on private property and grassy swales with overflow drywells in easements on private property. There are advantages and disadvantages to relying on on -site facilities for all stormwater management. One advantage is that on -site facilities are typically constructed with private funds and can be integrated into the development as a green space amenity. However, on -site facilities are sometimes not well maintained. Their capacity may be diminished over time or they may fail entirely during large runoff events. On -site facilities may take up large portions of a development site, thereby reducing the effective density that can be accommodated in that area. In 2004, the Spokane Valley City Council created a stormwater utility to develop and maintain storm drainage systems on City owned land. To create revenues for the stormwater utility operations, the Council adopted an annual fee per Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU). Residential ERUs are based on the number of single - family dwellings, while Commercial ERUs are based on the square footage of impervious surface associated with a business or commercial development. Inventory of Existing Facilities Spokane Valley's inventory of stormwater facilities, most of which are integral to the safe function of our street system, consists of about 7,200 drywells, 1900 bio- infiltration swales, 61 detention ponds, and one retention pond. Other facilities include curb inlets, bridge drains, and culverts, all of which require monitoring and maintenance. The retention pond, located at Dishman -Mica Road. and 32nd Ave., was constructed as a part of a road project and provides a disposal point for water flowing from Chester Creek. The inventory does not reflect stormwater structures located on private properties that do not serve the public street drainage system. Level of Service The Spokane County Board of Commissioners adopted new regional level of service standards for stormwater in 2004 as a part of the Countywide Planning Policies update: `Flooding of property outside designated drainage -ways, defacto drainage -ways, easements, flood zones or other approved drainage facilities, during the design precipitation or runoff event prescribed in the standards of the governing local agency or jurisdiction, shall be prevented within the reasonable probability afforded by such standards. Impact to buildings and accessory structures shall be avoided to the maximum extent practicable by evaluating the effects of a100 year rain event, and implementing measures to ensure that the runoff attendant to such event is directed away from such buildings and accessory structures. Any stormwater discharge to surface or ground waters must meet federal, state and local requirements for water quality treatment, stormwater runoff and infiltration. " The standards reflect current best practices that are established in adopted stormwater design guidelines. Spokane Valley follows said guidelines in reviewing and approving new development and is therefore in compliance with the regional LOS standards for stormwater runoff. Forecast of Future Needs Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 37 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Spokane Valley will continue to use private, on -site treatment facilities for new development and will install drywells, swales and other facilities as needed for new street improvement projects. Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities Location and capacities of future facilities is dependent on the location and size of new development, future public street projects, and projects that will address current problem areas within the City. Future updates to this Capital Facilities Plan will incorporate capital programming for stormwater facilities. Capital Projects and Financing Plan The City currently charges a $21 annual stormwater utility fee per Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) to generate revenues for stormwater facility engineering, maintenance and administration. The stormwater fee is expected to generate $1.8 million annually. Transportation Facilities Inventory of Existing Facilities This section of the Capital Facilities Plan includes transportation facilities within Spokane Valley, including streets, bridges, pathways and sidewalks. Street maintenance is not included as a part of the Capital Facilities Plan. Spokane Valley is responsible for about 455 miles of public roads, including 51 miles of Urban Principal Arterials, 61 miles of Urban Minor Arterials, 44 miles of Urban Collectors, and 298.85 miles of Local Access Streets. Table 4.36 provides a list of all arterial intersections within Spokane Valley. Level of Service Spokane Valley uses arterial intersection delay as its transportation level of service (LOS). This LOS is based on travel delay and is expressed as letters "A" through "F ", with "A" being the highest or best travel condition and "F" being the lowest or worst condition. The lowest acceptable LOS for signalized arterial intersections is set at "D "; the lowest acceptable LOS for un- signalized arterial intersections is set at "E ". This LOS standard conforms to the latest edition of the Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, published by the Transportation Research Board. Table 4.36 provides a six and twenty year level of service analysis for all arterial intersections in Spokane Valley. The analysis uses the regional transportation model prepared and maintained by the Spokane Regional Transportation Council as its basis for forecasting future intersection volumes. Levels of service calculations follow Highway Capacity Manual methodologies. The last column in the table cross - references to capital projects listed in Table 4.38. These projects will address capacity deficiencies at the corresponding intersection. Table 4.36 Intersection Level of Service Analysis 2014 2030 2010 -2015 Intersection Count Control 2008 2014 Mitigated 2030 Mitigated Project LOS LOS LOS LOS LOS Identifier 4th / Adams 2007 4 -way stop A A A 4th / Bowdish 2007 2 -way stop D D E 4th / Carnahan EST -2008 2 -way stop A A A Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 38 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.36 Intersection Level of Service Analysis Intersection Count Control 2008 LOS 2014 LOS 2014 Mitigated LOS 2030 LOS 2030 Mitigated LOS 2010 -2015 Project Identifier 4th / Dishman Mica EST -2008 2 -way stop C D D 4th / Evergreen 2006 2 -way stop E E F 4th / Farr EST -2008 2 -way stop B B B 4th / McDonald 2007 2 -way stop C D F 4th / Park 2008 2 -way stop B C F 4th / SR 27 EST -2008 2 -way stop D D E 4th / Sullivan 2007 Signal B B B 4th / Thierman 2007 4 -way stop A A B 4th / University 2008 Signal B B B 8th / Adams 2007 4 -way stop A A A 8th / Barker 2005 2 -way stop B B C 8th / Bettman EST -2008 2 -way stop C C C 8th / Bowdish EST -2008 2 -way stop C D D D D Bowdish TWLTL from 8th -32nd 8th / Carnahan 2005 4 -way stop B B F 8th / Dishman Mica 2008 Signal B B B 8th / Evergreen 2006 Signal A A A 8th / Farr 2007 2 -way stop B B C Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 39 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.36 Intersection Level of Service Analysis Intersection Count Control 2008 LOS 2014 LOS 2014 Mitigated LOS 2030 LOS 2030 Mitigated LOS 2010 -2015 Project Identifier 8th / McDonald 2007 2 -way stop C D F 8th / Park 2008 2 -way stop B B E 8th / SR 27 2001 2 -way stop C D E 8th / Sullivan 2007 Signal B B B 8th / Thierman EST -2008 2 -way stop C C C 8th / University 2008 Signal A A A 16th / Adams 2008 4 -way stop A A A 16th / Bowdish 2008 4 -way stop B C C D C Bowdish TWLTL from 8th -32nd 16th / Carnahan EST -2008 2 -way stop B B B 16th / Dishman Mica 2004 Signal B B C 16th / Evergreen 2006 Signal A A A 16th / McDonald 2008 4 -way stop A A C 16th / Pines 2008 2 -way stop E F A F B TBD —* 16th / Saltese EST -2008 2 -way stop B B B 16th / SR 27 2008 Signal C C A E B TBD*** 16th / Sullivan 2004 Signal B B C 16th / University 2009 Signal B B C 24th / Adams 2007 4 -way stop A A A Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 40 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.36 Intersection Level of Service Analysis Intersection Count Control 2008 LOS 2014 LOS 2014 Mitigated LOS 2030 LOS 2030 Mitigated LOS 2010 -2015 Project Identifier 24th / Blake EST -2008 4 -way stop A A A 24th / Bowdish 2007 2 -way stop C C C C C Bowdish TWLTL from 8th -32nd 24th / Evergreen 2008 4 -way stop A A A B A Evergreen TWLTL from 16th -32nd 24th / McDonald EST -2008 2 -way stop B B B 24th / Pines EST -2008 2 -way stop B B B 24th / SR 27 2007 2 -way stop C C E 24th / Sullivan 2008 Signal B C C 24th / University EST -2008 2 -way stop A A A 32nd / Bowdish 2005 Signal B B B B B 32nd / Dishman Mica EST -2008 2 -way stop B B B 32nd / Evergreen EST -2008 2 -way stop B C C C E 32nd / Pines 2005 Signal B B C 32nd / SR 27 2005 Signal B C E 32nd / University 2005 Signal A B B 44th / Schafer EST -2008 4 -way stop A A A Appleway / Barker 2005 Signal C D F Appleway / Dishman Mica 2008 Signal B B B Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 41 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.36 Intersection Level of Service Analysis Intersection Count Control 2008 LOS 2014 LOS 2014 Mitigated LOS 2030 LOS 2030 Mitigated LOS 2010 -2015 Project Identifier Appleway / Farr 2008 Signal A A A Appleway / Park 2008 Signal B B C Appleway / Thierman 2005 Signal D D F Appleway / University 2008 Signal B B B Appleway / Vista 2008 Signal A A A Blake / SR 27 EST -2008 2 -way stop B B B Broadway / Adams 2005 2 -way stop D D E Broadway / Argonne 2008 Signal B B D Broadway / Barker EST -2008 2 -way stop B B B Broadway / Bowdish 2005 Signal A A A Broadway / Conklin 2009 2 -way stop C C E Broadway / Evergreen 2005 Signal D D D Broadway / Fancher 2007 Signal C C A Broadway / Farr EST -2008 2 -way stop C C C Broadway / Flora 2008 2 -way stop C F A F B Roundabout Moore to Flora Broadway / Heacox 2009 2 -way stop C C D Broadway / McDonald 2005 Signal A A A Broadway / Mullan 2008 Signal B C D Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 42 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.36 Intersection Level of Service Analysis Intersection Count Control 2008 LOS 2014 LOS 2014 Mitigated LOS 2030 LOS 2030 Mitigated LOS 2010 -2015 Project Identifier Broadway / Park 2008 Signal D D C F D Park Road Broadway - Indiana Broadway / Pines 2009 Signal C C C Broadway / Sullivan 2007 Signal C C C Broadway / University 2007 Signal A A A Broadway / Vista 2007 Signal A A A Broadway / Yardley 2006 2 -way stop B B C Buckeye / Park EST -2008 2 -way stop A B B Buckeye / Vista EST -2008 2 -way stop B B B Dishman Mica/ Bowdish 2005 Signal B B C Euclid / Park 2005 2 -way stop B B B Euclid / Sullivan 2006 4 -way stop C C C Euclid -West / Barker 2004 2 -way stop B B E Euclid -East / Barker EST -2008 2 -way stop B B B Euclid -West / Flora 2007 2 -way stop B B B Euclid -East / Flora 2007 2 -way stop B B C Indiana / Evergreen 2009 Signal B B B Indiana / Mirabeau 2009 Signal A B B Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 43 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.36 Intersection Level of Service Analysis Intersection Count Control 2008 LOS 2014 LOS 2014 Mitigated LOS 2030 LOS 2030 Mitigated LOS 2010 -2015 Project Identifier Knox / Argonne 2008 Signal C C D Knox / Vista EST -2008 2 -way stop B B B Mansfield / Mirabeau 2009 2 -way stop C C C Mansfield / Pines 2008 Signal C C D Mirabeau / Pines 2008 2 -way stop F F A F B Install Signal Mission / Adams 2005 2 -way stop B B B Mission / Argonne 2005 Signal B B C Mission / Bowdish 2005 2 -way stop D D F Mission / Flora 2009 2 -way stop A F A F A Roundabout Indiana Extension Mission / McDonald 2006 Signal A A A Mission / Mission Conn. 2008 2 -way stop B C C Mission/ Mullan 2005 Signal B B B Mission / Park 2006 Signal B C B D C Park Road Broadway - Indiana Mission / Pines 2007 Signal D D E Mission / Sullivan 2005 Signal B B B Mission / Thierman EST -2008 2 -way stop B B B Mission / University 2008 2 -way stop C D F Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 44 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.36 Intersection Level of Service Analysis Intersection Count Control 2008 LOS 2014 LOS 2014 Mitigated LOS 2030 LOS 2030 Mitigated LOS 2010 -2015 Project Identifier Mission Conn. / Evergreen 2007 Signal A A A Montgomery / Argonne 2008 Signal D D D E D Argonne 1 -90 to Trent Montgomery / Mansfield 2008 RDB A C C Montgomery / University 2007 2 -way stop C D E Rutter / Park 2003 2 -way stop B B C Saltese / McDonald EST -2008 4 -way stop A D E Saltese / Sullivan 2008 2 -way stop C F B F B Install Signal Schafer / Dishman Mica 2008 Signal B B F Sprague / Adams 2008 Signal B B B Sprague / Appleway 2006 Signal A B B Sprague / Argonne 2008 Signal B B B Sprague / Barker 2008 4 -way stop A F B F C Install Signal Sprague / Bowdish 2008 Signal C C C Sprague / Conklin 2009 Signal A A A Sprague / Evergreen 2006 Signal C C C Sprague / Fancher 2007 Signal D D D Sprague / Farr 2008 Signal A A A Sprague / Flora 2005 Signal B B D Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 45 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.36 Intersection Level of Service Analysis Intersection Count Control 2008 LOS 2014 LOS 2014 Mitigated LOS 2030 LOS 2030 Mitigated LOS 2010 -2015 Project Identifier Sprague / 1 -90 WB On Ramp EST -2008 Signal A A A Sprague / McDonald 2009 Signal C C D Sprague / Mullan 2008 Signal B B B Sprague / Park 2008 Signal B B A Sprague / Pines 2008 Signal D D D Sprague / Progress 2008 Signal B B B Sprague / Sullivan 2008 Signal D D E Sprague / Thierman 2005 Signal B B B Sprague / University 2008 Signal D D D Sprague / Vista 2008 Signal B B A Thorpe / Dishman Mica EST -2008 2 -way stop B B B Thorpe / Madison 2007 2 -way stop A A B Trent / Argonne 2008 Signal D D E Trent / Barker 2007 2 -way stop D D F F/B West Trent TWLTL Trent / Evergreen 2008 Signal B B B Trent / Flora 2003 2 -way stop E E F F BTV- Eliminate NB Movement Trent / McDonald 2007 2 -way stop C D F Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 46 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.36 Intersection Level of Service Analysis Intersection Count Control 2008 LOS 2014 LOS 2014 Mitigated LOS 2030 LOS 2030 Mitigated LOS 2010 -2015 Project Identifier Trent / Park 2008 Signal B B F B/C BTV- Reconfigure Intersection Trent / Pines 2009 Signal C D F Trent / Progress 2007 2 -way stop C C E Trent/ Sullivan -N Ramp 2007 Signal A A A Trent/ Sullivan -S Ramp 2007 Signal A A A Trent / University 2008 2 -way stop C C BTV- Eliminate Intersection Trent / Vista 2008 Signal B B B Wellesley / Evergreen 2005 4 -way stop A B B Wellesley / McDonald 2009 4 -way stop D E F Wellesley / Progress 2007 4 -way stop B B A C A Bigelow Gulch Wellesley / Sullivan 2007 4 -way stop C C B D C Bigelow Gulch Install Signal State Controlled Intersections Broadway / Thierman 2009 Signal A A A Broadway / 1 -90 WB Ramp 2009 Signal A A A Broadway/ 1 -90 EB Ramp 2009 Signal B B B Argonne / 1 -90 WB Ramp 2008 Signal B B C Argonne / 1 -90 EB Ramp 2008 Signal B B C Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 47 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.36 Intersection Level of Service Analysis Intersection Count Control 2008 LOS 2014 LOS 2014 Mitigated LOS 2030 LOS 2030 Mitigated LOS 2010 -2015 Project Identifier Mullan / 1 -90 WB Ramp 2008 Signal B B B Mullan / 1 -90 EB Ramp 2008 Signal C C C Indiana / Pines 2008 Signal D D E Pines / 1 -90 EB Ramp 2008 Signal C E E Evergreen / 1 -90 WB Ramp 2009 Signal C B B Evergreen / 1 -90 EB Ramp 2009 Signal B B B Indiana / Sullivan 2007 Signal C D D Sullivan / 1 -90 WB Ramp 2006 Signal B B C Sullivan / 1 -90 EB Ramp 2006 Signal E E F Indiana / 1 -90 WB Ramp 2006 Signal B B B Barker/ 1 -90 WB Ramp EST -2008 Signal A F F Barker/ 1 -90 EB Ramp EST -2008 Signal B D E Note: See Table 4.38 for a listing of capital improvement projects. Includes volumes from Bigelow Gulch Road project Intersection may be impacted by Appleway Extension project, but analysis was not completed due to uncertainty of ROW *** Improvement options are still under evaluation BTV: Bridging the Valley Regional Level of Service The Countywide Planning Policies require that LOS standards be adopted in accordance with the regional minimum level of service standards set by the Growth Management Steering Committee of Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 48 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Elected Officials. The Steering Committee approved the use of corridor travel time for use in establishing the regional transportation system. The Spokane Regional Transportation Council is determining annual average corridor travel time through a travel time study. This study is still in progress and corridor travel time Level of Service standards will be adopted upon its completion. Uses of Level of Service Standards As measures of transportation effectiveness, LOS standards can help jurisdictions identify where and when transportation improvements are needed, and when development or growth will affect system operation. Level of service provides a standard below which a transportation facility or system is not considered adequate. Level of service standards can be used to evaluate the impact of proposed developments on the surrounding road system. They can also be used to identify problems, suggest remedial actions and apportion costs between public and private sources. LOS standards are a cornerstone in the development of equitable traffic impact fee systems, which makes development pay some of the costs for improvements to the transportation infrastructure. The Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) performed traffic modeling for the urban area, considering future population growth and distribution. This model examines the performance of the entire urban transportation system. Improvements to provide for the increased traffic volumes shown by the model at the adopted level of service standards, are included in this plan. More information on the transportation modeling based on future land use assumptions is contained in Chapter 3, Transportation. Relationship to Concurrency Management Concurrency involves matching public facilities and new development. The concept of concurrency predates the Growth Management Act for some public facilities, specifically through SEPA mitigation requirements. The GMA extends concurrency to transportation facilities by requiring that new development be served by adequate roads and public transportation service, and that development is not permitted to cause these transportation facilities to operate below level of service standards that are adopted by local governments in their comprehensive plans. "Adequate capacity refers to the maintenance of concurrency" (WAC 365- 195 -835). State Transportation Facilities The Growth Management Act requires local jurisdictions to include inventory and Level of Service information for state transportation facilities in their Comprehensive Plans. State facilities are divided into two categories: Highways of Statewide Significance (HSS), and Regionally Significant Highways (non -HSS). The Growth Management Act requires non -HSS facilities to be subject to concurrency. Interstate -90 (1 -90) is designated a HSS and is not subject to concurrence. SR -27 (Pines Road) and SR -290 (Trent Avenue) are designated non -HSS and are subject to concurrence. State Transportation Level of Service The Washington State Department of Transportation ( WSDOT) requires state transportation facilities in urban areas (inside the UGA) to maintain a minimum Level of Service standard "D." In rural areas (outside the UGA), the minimum LOS standard is "C." Those areas lying outside the UGA that may have urban characteristics can be evaluated by the WSDOT in conjunction with the City on a case -by- case basis to determine which standard is the most appropriate fit. Intergovernmental Coordination Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 49 of 61 Tnhle 4.37 State Highway l-g9 i, .,+ ;at(Q 999 CR77 Pone -; R ;;d A nn HSS �8 Trent A Pnwe Alen -k22 - moo, --aew� ;�,.�„� NGR H99 -- Reg;eT °'li°T9T"fiGaR +"Highway Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Transportation plans were distributed for comment to all jurisdictions that may be impacted by, or impact, Spokane Valley's transportation system, including adjacent towns and cities, Spokane County, Spokane Transit Authority, Washington State DOT, and Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC). SRTC has overall responsibility for intergovernmental coordination of transportation plans. Each jurisdiction in the region must submit transportation plans to SRTC for inclusion in the Metropolitan Transportation Plan. SRTC responsibilities include: 1) Certifying the transportation elements of comprehensive plans adopted by the County, cities and towns in the region for consistency with the Metropolitan Transportation Plan; 2) Maintaining consistency between infrastructure plans and land use development plans, and 3) Reviewing LOS thresholds for transportation facilities in the Spokane Region. SRTC is also responsible for monitoring and evaluating the performance of regional transportation facilities as affected by land use and transportation improvement decisions. Concurrency management is linked to the planning process. Any amendments to the comprehensive plans require a concurrency management system analysis and must meet thresholds before their adoption. SRTC will annually assess the regional transportation system with respect to regional concurrency. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing Capital Projects Table 4.38 contains a complete list of transportation related capital projects f ^r the „oars :2002 The City updates the six year TIP throughout the year as project priorities and funding changes. This Plan adopts by reference any updates to the TIP occurring between Plan update cycles. The current TIP is available for viewing online at www.spokanevalley.org. These projects address capacity issues at intersections and safety improvements. Following is a discussion of potential funding sources. Funding Sources Funding for the operation and expansion of the City's transportation system falls into several categories, which include federal, state and city funds. Some sources consist of reliable annual funds while others are periodic, such as grants. The use, availability and applicability of these various sources are not always at the discretion of the City. Spokane Valley will develop a track record with funding agencies as time goes on, which will help make to make more reliable funding assumptions. A summary of expected federal, state and local funding sources for the City's six year Capital Improvement Program is shown in Table 4.39. The following is a summary of transportation funding options. Federal Assistance These funds are authorized under the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act for the 21St Century (SAFETEA -21) and are administered by the Federal Highway Administration through Washington State Department of Transportation and the Metropolitan Planning Organization (Spokane Regional Transportation Council). Federal funding programs include Bridge Replacement (BR), Congestion Management and Air Quality (CMAQ) and the Surface Transportation Program (STP). State Assistance The Washington State Transportation Improvement Board administers State transportation programs, including the Urban Corridor Program (UCP), the Urban Arterial Program (UAP), and the Sidewalk Program (SP). City Funds Spokane Valley contributes revenues from the General Fund and the Real Estate Excise Tax funds for transportation projects. The City also receives State Motor Fuel Tax and Restricted State Fuel Tax. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 50 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Pavement Preservation Fund The Pavement Preservation fund was created during the 2011 Budget development process for the purpose of setting money aside for future street capital improvement projects. In the 2012 budget, the City opted to transfer 100% of the General Fund unreserved fund balance in excess of $26.000.000 to the Pavement Preservation fund. In the 2013 budget, the City committed to financing pavement preservation at a level equivalent to 6% of 2013 General Fund. Financing pavement preservation at an amount equivalent to 6% of General Fund expenditures through the aforementioned plan is sustainable for approximately 4 years. Beyond that point, we anticipate the financial commitment to pavement preservation is sustainable at an annual level of no less than $1,437,857. Because this is a Capital Protect Fund whose sole purpose is to provide for Pavement Preservation projects, any money not expended in a given year will remain in the fund and will be available for reappropriation in subsequent years. Revenues and expenditures for the Pavement Preservation Program are shown in Table 4.37. Table 4.37 Pavement Preservation Revenues and Expenditures 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Revenues General Fund 855 857 855 857 855 857 855 857 855 857 855 857 Street Fund JZL2 000 JZL2 000 JZL2 000 JZL2 000 JZL2 000 JZL2 000 Civic Facility Replacement Fund $616,284 $616,284 $616,284 $554,996 0 0 REET 1 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 ii5Lo 000 REET 2 115Lo 000 115Lo 000 115Lo 000 115Lo 000 115Lo 000 115Lo 000 Total Revenues $2,054,141 $2,054,141 $2,054,141 $1,992,853 $1,437,857 $1,437,857 Total Ex enditures $2,054,141 $2,054,141 $2,054,141 $1,992,853 $1,437,857 $1,437,857 Fund Balance LO LO LO LO LO LO Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 51 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan M - - O - - - - -t-- ��7►7,� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 52 of 61 0— - - M. 151AMIN IN, © -- - -- - „ ' - aw Wr ©- - ' ----- ! -- M - - O - - - - -t-- ��7►7,� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 52 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan WE 1—yr-MyR a _ - - - - Nz Table 4.38 Six -Year Transportation Capital Facilities and Financing Plan 2013 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 53 of 61 .. 1 1 11 11111 © _ - - - _ _ - - _ - - -� _ - - - - WE 1—yr-MyR a _ - - - - Nz Table 4.38 Six -Year Transportation Capital Facilities and Financing Plan 2013 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 53 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan (dollars in thousands) Item # Project Name Primary Source C� Amount Total Amount 1 Argonne Road - 190 to Trent CMAQ 120 882 2 Mission Ave. - Flora Rd. to Barker Rd. PE /RW STP U 89 659 3 Sidewalk Infill Program CMAQ $65 $324 4 Sullivan Road West Bridge BR 242 J1 208 5 24th Ave Sidewalk - Adams to Sullivan Cit 132 258 6 1 Mansfield Ave Connection - Pines SR -27 to 200 -ft East of Houk Rd UCP 61 $1,541 7 Sidewalk & Transit Stop Accessibilit Pro ect Other- FTA 22 111 8 Spokane Valley- Millwood Trail - SCC to Evergreen Rd (PE) STP(E) 0 559 9 Sullivan Rd /UPRR Overpass Bridge Resurfacing Project BR 92 IL61 10 University Rd /1 -90 Overpass Study CMAQ 26 188 11 Wellesley / Adams Sidewalk Project Other State L 570 12 Park Road - #2 - Broadway to Indiana RW & CN STP U 20 150 13 Park Road #1 Sidewalk Project - Sinto Ave. to Indiana Ave. Other State L 49 14 Park Road #2 Sidewalk Project - Marietta Ave. to Buckeye Ave. Other State 1 23 15 S ra ue Ave Resurfacin - Fancher to Dollar Cit 249 249 16 Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Havana to Fancher ED _Lanes Cit 500 500 17 Sullivan / Euclid Concrete Intersection RW /CN STP U 211 a 562 _ 18 Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study - 1 -90 to Wellesley STP(U) 27 200 2013 Totals: 11 861 9 494 Table 4.38 Six -Year Transportation Capital Facilities and Financing Plan 2014 dollars in thousands Item # Project Name Primary Source City Amount Total Amount 4 Sullivan Road West Bride Other Fed 213 8 440 12 Park Road - #2 - Broadway to Indiana (RW & CN) SIP(U) 388 $2,877 13 Park Road #1 Sidewalk Protect - Sinto Ave. to Indiana Ave. Other State 19 385 14 Park Road #2 Sidewalk Project - Marietta Ave. to Buckeye Ave. Other State �6 120 19 Argonne Road Resurfacing - S ra ue to Broadway Cit 295 295 20 Broadway Ar onne /Mullan Concrete Intersections CN Onl STP U 285 2 110 21 Euclid Ave Reconstruction - Flora to E City Limits City $1,610 J1 610 22 Ever reen Road Resurfacin - S ra ue to Mission Cit 995 995 23 Greenacres Trail - Sullivan to E City Limits RW &CN STP E ) I LO 1 11 095 24 Mission Ave. - Flora Rd. to Barker_RqLQNj UAP I JQ83 1 13_416 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 54 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 25 Mullan Road Resurfacing - Dishman Mica to Broadway City 295 295 26 Spokane Valley- Millwood Trail - SCC to Evergreen Rd (RW &CN) STP(E) 0 100 27 Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Herald to Universit city $405 $405 28 Sullivan Road Concrete Pavement Phase 1 - Marietta to Euclid STP U 32 236 2014 Totals: 5 226 22 379 Table 4.38 Six -Year Transportation Capital Facilities and Financing Plan 2015 dollars in thousands Item # Project Name Primary Source C� Amount Total Amount 4 Sullivan Road West Bride Other Fed 213 8 440 26 Spokane Valley-Millwood Trail - SCC to Evergreen Rd RW &Ckl STELE �—O 2 140 28 Sullivan Road Concrete Pavement Phase 1 - Marietta to Euclid a=u 336 2 485 29 Applewav Trail - University to Evergreen STP(E) 0 100 30 Dishman Mica Resurfacin - Sands to Thorpe Cit 353 353 31 1 Euclid Ave Reconstruction - Wend to Sullivan City 555 555 32 Flora Road Reconstruction - Euclid to Trent City a 395 a 395 33 Madison Road Reconstruction - 40th to Thorpe cit y a 550 a 550 34 Mission Ave Resurfacing - Argonne to Herald City 470 470 35 1 Mullan Road Resurfacin - Broadwav to Mission Cit 311 311 36 Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Argonne to Herald STP U 96 710 37 Sullivan Road Resurfacing - Broadway to Mission a=u 38 JZ80 2015 Totals: 5 317 jj8 789 Table 4.38 Six -Year Transportation Capital Facilities and Financing Plan 2016 dollars in thousands Item # Proiect Name Primary Source Citv Amount Total Amount 26 Spokane Valley-Millwood Trail - SCC to Evergreen Rd RW &CN STELE �—O 2 140 29 Appleway Trail - University to Ever reen STELE 0 100 38 Applewav Blvd Resurfacing - Vista to Dishman Mica City $1,155 J1 155 39 Ar onne Road Concrete Pavement - 1 -90 to Mont ome City 362 362 40 Dishman Mica Road Resurfacing - 40th to Sands Cit 280 280 41 1 Dishman Mica Road Resurfacing - Thorpe to S City Limit City 210 210 42 Euclid Ave Reconstruction - Sullivan to Marietta STP U 285 2 110 43 Farr Road Reconstruction - 4th to 8th City 525 525 44 Progress Road Reconstruction - Wellesley to Crown City 485 485 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 55 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 45 Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Vista to Argonne SIP U 90 670 46 Sullivan Road Resurfacing - Sprague to Broadway STP(LI 113 840 2016 Totals: 11 505 Ig 877 Table 4.38 Six -Year Transportation Capital Facilities and Financing Plan 2017 dollars in thousands Item # Proiect Name Primary Source Citv Amount Total Amount 29 Applewav Trail - University to Evergreen STP(E) 0 1 000 39 Argonne Road Concrete Pavement - 1 -90 to Montgomery City $2,776 2 776 47 Barker Road / BNSF Grade Separation PE & RW OnIV Other Fed 101 750 48 Euclid Ave Reconstruction - Marietta to Flora cit y a 435 a 435 49 Evergreen Road Resurfacing - 1 -90 to Indiana Cit 280 280 50 1 Farr Road Reconstruction - Applewav to 4th City 250 250 51 S ra ue / Fancher Concrete Intersection STP U 212 $1,572 52 Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Flora to Corbin STP U 58 430 53 Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Park to Vista STP U 80 595 54 Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Sullivan to Conklin I STP U 94 695 55 Sullivan Road Concrete Pavement Phase 2 - Euclid to Kiernan I STP(U) 39 291 2017 Totals: $5,325 $10.074 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 56 of 61 Table 4.38 Six -Year Transportation Capital Facilities and Financing 2018 dollars in thousands Plan Item # Proiect Name Primary Source city Amount Total Amount 29 Applewav Trail - University to Evergreen STP(E) 0 1 000 47 Barker Road / BNSF Grade Separation (PE & RW Onlyl Other Fed 256 1 899 55 Sullivan Road Concrete Pavement Phase 2 - Euclid to Kiernan STP U [City 414 3 069 56 Sprague / Ar onne - Mullan Concrete Intersections $2,342 2 342 2018 Totals: __L3,.0.12 __18.31 0 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 56 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 57 of 61 Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Tahlp 4 29 sox Year T-ranspeFtation WpFevement PFegFam SunWary 2011 through 2016 (on $1-,� Secured Projects Planned Projects Totals Ye r Federal Teials IY-ew Federal State Other City Total r dpral State Other City Total r dpral State Other city Total 125-2 $.735 $4A $9 $-4-9 $f}974 $2,496 $ 694 $9 $635 $3-44 V—M4 $9 $4-64 $10,246 120-3 $44Q $0 $0 $242 $4394 $.993 $4484 $38 $4;848 $44;460 $624 $4-144 $38 $2;090 $42,554 2M $7,227 $a; 000 $0 $243 $8440 $5,294 $3,749 $955 $4,576 $40,624 $12,428 $4,749 $955 $4499 $19,061 2M $7,227 $4,000 $0 $243 $8440 $9-954 $2, 373 $98 $5,679 $13,140 $16,218 $3,373 $08 $4844 $21;589 2046 $9 $0 $9 $9 $9 $49,992 $+,947 $ 534 $1;877 $20;339 $49,992 $+,g47 $534 $1;877 $20;339 244-7 49 $9 $9 $9 $0 $44- 834 $4;476 $ 570 $4-,9A $24,08 $44;834 $4;476 $570 $4,9A $2�a08 $2a,34 42 26 $0 $- 8 $25; 245 $46;227 $23,500 $a, 335 $9,442 $80,004 W,--U $25;426 $-,335 $4 9 UQr.49 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 57 of 61 Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Table 4.39 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Summary 2013 through 2018 (in $1,0001 Secured Projects Planned Projects Totals Ye r Federal State Other City Total Federal State Other City Total Federal State Other cltv Total 20 2 $3878 $1486 177 759 $6300 $2023 69 LOO $1102 3194 $5901 $1555 177 $1861 JaAL4 20 3 s7227 sl000 L0 213 $8440 $5713 $3213 LOO $5013 $13,93 9 12 940 $4213 L0 5 226 $22,379 20 J= JM L0 213 JMN JL2L5 L0 LOO JaJ24 $10,34 9 12 47 IM L0 5 317 $18,789 201 $0 Lo Lo Lo L IL22 LO L 3 505 J= J= LO L $3505 $8877 20 6 $00 LOO L0 LOO LOO MM L0 $38 KM $10,07 4 R 711 LOO 38 ILM $10,074 20 7 '0 Lo L0 i0 J0 5.203 L0 J95 3.012 8 310 5 203 LOO 95 3 012 8 310 To I 18 332 3 486 177 1 185 23180 28 267 3 282 133 IL 061 JL4 743 JL6 599 J6 768 310 IL 246 77 923 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Page 57 of 61 Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.40 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013 Through 2018 (in $1,000) Pro'ects without Local Match within Existing Resources Pro'ect Name Pro'ect Description Total Cost Arterial Improvement Projects Bowdish Road - 16th to Sprague Sprague to 8th: Inlay & Enhancement: 8th to 16th: Reconstruct as 2 -lane section w/ curb, sidewalk, bike lanes $2,851.00 and new stormwater facilities; Bowdish Road - 24th to 16th Reconstruct Roadway as 2 -lane section w/ curb, sidewalk 846.00 and new stormwater _facilities- Bowdish Bowdish Road - 32nd to 24th Reconstruct Roadway as 2 -lane section w/ curb, sidewalk 637.00 and new stormwater _facilities- Sullivan Sullivan Road North Extension (Bigelow Reconstruct and widen the Sullivan Road extension north $55.00 also known as Bigelow Gulch Road to a 4 -lane roadway Gulch ) with 8 -foot shoulders and a 12 -foot two way left turn lane. Wellesley Realignment 0) Barker /SR290 Realign connection of Wellesley to Barker Rd and SR290, $5,187.00 3 -lane section, Part of Barker /BNSF Grade Separation Bridge Projects Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 58 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Barker Road / BNSF Grade Separation Construct Grade Separation at Barker /BNSF RR/ Trent $32,000.00 C( N Only) S( R2901 Park Road /BNSF Grade Separation Reconstruct Park Road to separate the grades of Park Road $16,520.00 and the BNSF railroad tracks. Domestic Water Congestion Improvement Projects Consolidated Consolidated Evergreen ITS Improvements Traffic Control Systems Upgrades for Evergreen(Broadway 708.00 to 16th Pines Corridor ITS: Sprague to 16th Traffic Signal Control System for Corridor $785.00 Saltese /Sullivan Traffic Signal Improvements to Intersection, Install Traffic Signal (In coordination w/ Spokane County 586.00 Sprague / Barker Traffic Signal Install Traffic Signal $594.00 Reconstruction Projects F. D. No. 1 F.D. No. 1 Sprague / Thierman Concrete Intersection Reconstruct intersection in concrete pavement $1,242.00 Sprague / University Concrete Intersection Reconstruct Intersection in concrete pavement; $1,660.00 Sullivan / Kiernan Concrete Intersection Reconstruct Intersection in concrete pavement; $1,423.00 Sullivan / Marietta Concrete Intersection Reconstruct intersection in concrete pavement $1,493.00 Sullivan Road Concrete Pavement Phase Concrete Pavement OCI: 37.28 (2013) $2,933.00 3 - Inland to Marietta Sullivan Road Concrete Pavement Phase Concrete Pavement; OCI: 37.28 (2013) $2,398.00 4 - Spokane River to Inland Sullivan Road Concrete Pavement Phase Concrete Pavement; OCI 37.45 (2013) $2,720.00 5 - Kiernan to Trent Street Preservation Projects Pavement Management Program -2013 Annual street preservation projects per PMP $3,729.00 Pavement Management Program -2014 Annual street preservation projects per PMP $4,229.00 Pavement Management Program -2015 Annual street preservation projects per PMP $3,806.00 Pavement Management Program -2016 Annual street preservation projects per PMP $3,206.00 Pavement Management Program -2017 Annual street preservation projects per PMP $3,914.00 Pavement Management Program -2018 Annual street preservation projects per PMP $4,200.00 Pavement Management Program - Local Annual street preservation projects $12,000.00 Access Total $113,722.00 Potential Annexation Areas /Urban Services The Growth Management Act requires that counties designate urban growth areas (UGAs). The City of Spokane Valley identified lands adjacent to the City within existing UGAs that would likely be developed for urban uses and potentially be annexed to the City. In order to assess the need for capital facilities, the City has identified existing service providers within the Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs). This assessment should help identify the effects a potential annexation area will have on existing levels of service. Table 4.41 Existing Urban Service Providers within Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs) PAAs Northwood Northeast East Southeast South Ponderosa Edgecliff Domestic Water Pasadena Park Consolidated Consolidated Vera Vera S.C. W.D. No. 3 East Spokane Hutton Settlement Consolidated S.C. W.D. No. 3 Fire & Emergency F.D. No. 1 & 9 F. D. No. 1 F.D. No. 1 F.D. No. 1 & 8 F.D. No. 1 & 8 F.D. No. 8 F.D. No. 1 & 8 Law Enforcement Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 59 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.41 Existing Urban Service Providers within Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs) PAAs Northwood Northeast East Southeast South Ponderosa Edgecliff Libraries S.C. Library Dist. S.C. Library Dist. S.C. Library Dist. S.C. Library Dist. S.C. Library Dist. S.C. Library Dist. S.C. Library Parks & Open Space Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Public Schools W.V. S.D. & S.D. 81 E.V. S.D C.V. S.D. C.V. S.D. C.V. S.D. C.V. S.D. W.V. S.D. & Public Transit Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Sanitary Sewer Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Not Sewered Spokane County Solid Waste /Recycle Waste Mgmt. Waste Mgmt. Waste Mgmt. Waste Mgmt. Waste Mgmt. Waste Mgmt. Waste Mgmt. Storm water Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Street Cleaning Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Transportation Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County The City of Spokane Valley has adopted Levels of Service (LOS) to measure a public facility or service's operational characteristics to gauge its performance. The following analysis will assess current levels of service in the PAAs to provide a context of how annexation could affect the City's LOS and provide guidance for phasing of annexations. Additionally, the analysis will provide City staff and elected officials information to assist in the planning and budgeting of public service delivery as a result of annexation to the City of Spokane Valley. The following study includes LOS analysis for sanitary sewer and parks and open space. Analysis is not provided for services where the City has adopted the minimum regional LOS. Services excluded from this analysis are domestic water, fire protection, law enforcement, libraries, public schools, public transit, sanitary sewer, solid waste /recycle, storm water, street cleaning, and transportation. If a level of service is measured on a per capita basis, the population assumptions are based on Table 2.1 (Land Capacity Analysis) in the Land Use chapter and Spokane County's estimated current population in the Metropolitan Urban Growth Areas (UGAs). The City of Spokane Valley's land capacity analysis is based on the adopted regional methodology. Sanitary Sewer The City of Spokane Valley does not provide sanitary sewer service at this time. Spokane County provides wastewater collection and transport systems within the City of Spokane Valley. Incorporated areas must have wastewater collection and transport systems in accordance with the adopted sewer concurrency requirements. The table below provides a sewer assessment within the PAAs. Level of service is categorized as sewered, within the 6 -year sewer plan, or not planned for sewer. Table 4.42 Sewer assessment within Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs) in Acres PAAs Total Sewered Within 6 -year Sewer not Percentage CIP available Sewered Northwood 1,820 1,397 0 423 77% Northeast 48 5 0 43 11% East 380 64 207 109 17% Southeast 791 443 0 347 56% South 1,041 669 0 371 64% Ponderosa 47 0 12 35 0% Edgecliff 298 21 0 276 7% Currently, Spokane County owns a capacity allocation of 10 million gallons per day (mgd) in the Spokane Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant (SAWTP). By the year 2020, the County's flow is projected to Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 60 of 61 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan reach 21 mgd. In 1999, Spokane County began a Wastewater Facilities Plan process to evaluate long- term regional wastewater needs, and to determine alternatives to meet those needs. The result was a decision by the Board of County Commissioners to build a new Spokane County Regional Water Reclamation Facility (SCRWRF). Spokane County is proposing to construct a new regional wastewater treatment plant at the Stockyards site in the City of Spokane. The new treatment plant and associated facilities will provide additional capacity for increased wastewater flows generated by the County's Septic Elimination Program and for projected growth in the County's service area. Many of the PAAs have sewer services, however new development will continue to add demand for new sewer services. The City should evaluate existing sewer treatment capacity and infrastructure prior to annexation. Parks and Open Space The City of Spokane Valley has an adopted level of service of 1.92 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. In 2007, Spokane County commissioned a fiscal study of the Urban Growth Areas (UGAs). The report focuses on the services provided by Spokane County to the metropolitan UGAs and the revenue generated for Spokane County in these areas. The report established a base population in the metropolitan UGAs using 2000 Census data and building permits. The estimated population for the UGAs adjacent to the City of Spokane Valley was determined to be 7,294. The City of Spokane Valley 2007 Land Quantity Analysis (LQA) estimated the land capacity in the PAAs could potentially add 13,406 additional residents. Using the population estimate from Spokane County's fiscal study and the City of Spokane Valley's estimated land capacity there is the potential of 20,700 residents at build out in the PAAs. Currently there are no parks in the PAAs. If the City annexed all the PAAs 40 acres of parkland would be needed to meet the current level of service of 1.92 acres. According to the City's Park Master Plan, many residents in the City of Spokane Valley are not conveniently located near a park. The City's Park Master Plan states that parks should be one of the highest priorities for the City. The plan also states that meeting Park needs can be a challenge in neighborhoods where little vacant land exists. Many residents expressed a desire for sports fields (complexes); these facilities generally require large vacant properties. The City should consider purchasing parkland prior to annexation to ensure adequate facilities will be available to serve neighborhoods in Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs). Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 06 -06 -2012) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 61 of 61 I I I 8 8 M e r Spa 'O i ' = ' 30A_ Map 4.5 6300 i _ _ _ _ i —_ _ _ - - - -= ---= 6 _ 1 Six -Year Sewer Projects 1 shoo 1 - - - -,- � -' - -- - - - -� -- - -� - -- - - - -I -,,,1.. - ----- --� -�- - - - I -� -,- - - -;- --- r--- . + - - - -I- r 5600 -- , I' ' �. ' 1 -rte , ' wamsiey wTmeal -Are11 n _ _ _ _ _ _ r- 1 6 4800 asoo _ � ----------- 1 Cit of ' Spokane I ' 1 , ' �29U` I ' -_aoo_ ___ -t- ' - -- -_- --- ' - - - -- - - - -- --- _a000_ ..�. i . Eua;d -A=` Cdy of Mdlw,00d zoo 1 3200 3 1 & oaf R,. Ave eul6emc.Y M _ I Ave -- - •- - - - -y- -%�;- � - - -- -- - -� - -- � -- zao0 1 _ I 5 z9o;�rlA ssa9o,ebs.9. I °�'��.rils Iea;aom AVe ' I -a51�- -- 1 � — R Owb; S1r SR 11'bioo '� ' sz<� nrraa,eaAe ' �� +— - - -b - - - - - Mss ; euAva - - - - t- M;aa,ean�e� _City_;ofo - - �Mssio Ava — -Misn ®Avc T L V x9aWg , IT Liberk \ C i shareAVeis�9a ® G q: :ti� nrtvt SR b��a w a Lake I � ,�w. y Se I ,, w I I �sA.9o.wb SK+9 PabTSlb9owb.� Sy 90 eb �� 800 Broad--AS— a° Q - ? - �oadway =Avef � Bro adway Avci� -Broadway Avc- .Broadway Avei Broadway Ave � Broadway Ave— - Broadway Aver I� � � �.� - .Iva ➢eywar Ave" o � I II 0 ��- TSeasee Awe R� -/--= seayee Awe - iSp.as�w -A.2— � seeasee�A�e__ - SpeaseeA�e I__' _ se.asee Awe ��Sp.ag„eA se.aseex�•- - Third Ave SR 90r6 SRl9d' �' -• - -•� PPtewaY'Blvd' , T�pptc�vay,�Blv�d�� - I i b�- �VPoui�Ava 1 1 P �Eighlh Ave- PomW Ava - PoWhAva slyeAyy 1 W 800 I I - I I Lake ' _ T 1I I - -� v EigbW Ave I- - _ Eighrh Ave. - - - i - - - _ -, - - EigWh -Ave I - - EigbW Ave- - - - - - - - T - - - - - EighW Avea - -" 800' ; - I '1.00 -6th Ave S ' _ _ a _ _ _ r _ _ _r _ _ _ _1600 i �- - •- - _ ' _ _ _ _ _ � - - - IfiW Ava � ' Ifilh•Ava- @et�ae � Ifilh Ava 1 — IfiW Ava- � � y ' 1 , ' � ' I .. "= 2109 r ��__ __ '____y__ __C _ zaw Ave - - - I zaw nve��1 ( - _�__' "- ?1____24A0__ - --- Legend City of Spokane Valley Boundary ' I Urban Growth Area - Municipal Areas Water Bodies - - - - Address Grid City of Spokane Valley Sewer Infrastructure Sewered Interceptors = Collectors ® Lift Stations City of Spokane Sewer Service Area Sewered Map Location --r'- ' f% � 3Zk2900 a I , , z, 0- - 1 ' ' I Effective Date: 6 /062012 - - -'1 i Ordinance No.: 12 -014 ' _ 1 ____ _____ ____ __ __I_____! ___ 4600_ ' 1 :y)1� i _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . -'_ 11(�� P f 4400 I _ I I' i . p I I _ -- I 446p aaltr - - - - -- 1I1 I I Milee Notice: the in ormation shown on this led ources and is subject to constant revision The Ci y make sno cl taims _ _ _ _ �_ _ _ _ 1 _ or guarantees about we accuracy or currency fth map and ° I - -• - - -- O - ° a" a 4 ,_ - _I -°I .ter •I •a 00 •+ 5700 _Pressly disclaims liability for errors and omissions in its contents. -�____ ^ _ -____�__________^ ____ ^ ;_____�____ ' - � - - , - - T - - - ,� , To co �m accuracy contact the City of Spokane Valley, Community i Development Department, Division o(Plarming, (509) 921 -1000. Bmduc—dw City of Spuka- Vaney, CUmmunity ue 1.pm V),actrw.t City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan CHAPTER 7 — ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 7.0 Introduction and Purpose A city can foster economic development to achieve its goals by anticipating and responding to changes in the local, regional, national and international economies. For Spokane Valley, these goals include providing for economic stability through economic diversity and encouraging a broad range of jobs to help employ the community's residents. A city's economic development actions can include activities primarily directed toward economic development and those undertaken for other reasons, but that also produce economic benefits. Examples of activities primarily directed toward economic development include allocating land for manufacturing uses, extending water and sewer systems to business sites, providing tax credits and incentives, and advance planning to accommodate growth. Examples of activities with economic benefits as secondary impacts include providing an efficient transportation system, encouraging high quality schools, providing for affordable housing, streamlining permit processes and providing park and recreation facilities and activities that improve the quality of life. Market - driven economic growth depends upon the decisions of individuals and firms; most jobs and investments are generated by private businesses. Local governments must also contend with forces beyond local control, such as changes in the regional, national and international economies. These changes result from numerous individual decisions and changes in economic and social trends. However, local governments can plan to take advantage of favorable trends and lessen the impact of unfavorable trends. Local governments also can hinder economic development through ill- advised policies, such as fiscal zoning which involves zoning more land than is needed for uses that produce relatively high tax revenues. 7.1 Planning Context 7.1.1 Washington State Growth Management Act The Growth Management Act (GMA) includes economic development as one of its basic goals. It considers the need to stimulate economic development throughout the state, but requires that these activities be balanced with the need to protect the physical environment. It encourages the efficient use of land, the availability of urban services, and the financing strategies necessary to pay for infrastructure. Finally, the GMA mandates that communities do their planning and then provide the zoning and regulatory environment so that appropriate development can occur. GMA recognizes that while the public sector can shape and influence development, it is the private sector that generates community growth. The GMA goal regarding economic development provides: RCW 36.70A.020(5) Economic development — Encourage economic development throughout the state that is consistent with adopted comprehensive plans, promote economic opportunity for all citizens of this state, especially for unemployed and for disadvantaged persons... and encourage growth... all within the capacities of the state's natural resources, public services, and public facilities. The GMA requires an economic development element be included in comprehensive plans (RCW 36.70A.070 (7)). An economic development element must include the following: • A summary of the local economy such as population, employment, payroll, sectors, businesses, sales, and other information as appropriate; A summary of the strengths and weaknesses of the local economy defined as the commercial and industrial sectors and supporting factors such as land use, transportation, utilities, education, work force, housing, and natural /cultural resources; and, Adopted April 25, 2006 (Update 06- 06 -12) Chapter 7 — Economic Development Page 1 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan An identification of policies, programs, and projects to foster economic growth and development and to address future needs. 7.1.2 County Wide Planning Policies The Spokane County Wide Planning Policies (CWPPs) required by GMA (RCW 36.70A.210) and adopted in 1994 with subsequent amendments in 1996, 1997 and 2004, provide a regional framework to achieve goals of the GMA. The CWPPs establish overall policy direction that calls for greater cooperation and coordination between the private sector and government in measuring both the performance of the local economy and the relationship between economic development and preservation of the area's natural environment and quality of life. In addition, the CWPPs emphasize the need for a regional (Eastern Washington and Northern Idaho) approach to the critical environmental issues of water and air quality; recognize the importance of central business areas, and the benefits of locating housing and regional transportation facilities in close proximity to employment centers. CWPP pertinent to the City of Spokane Valley include: Policies: 1. Include an economic development element in each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan that establishes local goals, policies, objectives, and provisions for economic growth and vitality and a high quality of life. The element shall include: a. a summary of the local economy such as population, employment, payroll, sectors, businesses, sales, and other information as appropriate; b. a summary of the strengths and weaknesses of the local economy defined as the commercial and industrial sectors and supporting factors such as land use, transportation, utilities, education, work force, housing, and natural /cultural resources; and c. an identification of policies, programs, and projects to foster economic growth and development and to address future needs. A city that has chosen to be a residential community is exempt from the economic development element requirement of the GMA. 2. Jurisdictions should adopt in their comprehensive plans economic development policies which will help protect the environment as a key economic value in the region. 4. Maintain the integrity of downtowns (Central Business Districts) as centers for retail, business and cultural activity. 5. Each jurisdiction should designate sites for industrial and service employers to encourage them to locate throughout urban areas in proximity to housing and regional transportation facilities (including public transportation). 7.2 Summary of Local Economy Economic data, including employment information, is collected by the State of Washington at both the County level and for the Spokane Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). Table 7.1 summarizes 2011 employment data in the Spokane MSA in comparison with the state of Washington. From September 2009 to September 2010, Spokane County posted the largest employment loss among large counties in Washington State, down 1.7 percent. Nationally, employment increased 0.2 percent during the same 12 month period.' U S Department of Labor, Bureau of Land Statistics, Third Quarter 2010 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Update 06- 06 -12) Chapter 7 — Economic Development Page 2 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 7.1 2011 Employment Spokane MSA **NAICS INDUSTRY TITLE (numbers in thousands) Spokane, September 2011 Washington September 2011 Total Number Employed 206,650 3,194,560 Percent Unemployed 8.6% 8.5% Average Monthly Earnings $3,550 $4,685 Source: Workforce Explorer Table 7.2 shows November 2011 Spokane MSA Employment statistics by industry category. Employment figures include the self - employed. Industries which saw the largest increase in employment include natural resources, information and state educational services. Table 7.2 Nonagricultural Wage and Salary Employment in the Spokane Metropolitan Statistical Area (Spokane County) (in thousands) **NAICS INDUSTRY TITLE (numbers in thousands) Nov "11 % Change from Nov '10 TOTAL NONFARM 206.3 -0.9 TOTAL PRIVATE 169.9 -0.8 GOODS PRODUCING 24.4 -1.6 NATURAL RESOURCES and MINING 9.3 -8.8 MANUFACTURING 15.1 3.4 SERVICES PROVIDING 181.9 -.08 TRADE, TRANSPORTATION, and UTILITIES 41.4 0.2 Wholesale Trade 9.4 0 Retail Trade 25.8 0 Food and Beverage Stores 4.3 0 General Merchandise Stores 6.2 3.3 Transportation, Warehousing, and Utilities 6.2 1.6 INFORMATION 2.7 -6.9 FINANCIAL ACTIVITIES 12.0 0 Finance and Insurance 9.0 -1.1 PROFESSIONAL and BUSINESS SERVICES 21.1 -.09 EDUCATION and HEALTH SERVICES 39.6 -2.9 Health and Social Assistance 34.1 -1.2 Ambulatory Health Care Services 13.8 0.7 Hospitals 8.7 3.6 LEISURE and HOSPITALITY 19.4 2.6 Food Services and Drinking Places 14.0 -.07 OTHER SERVICES 9.3 1.1 GOVERNMENT 36.4 -1.6 Federal Government 4.6 0 Total State Government 11.0 -5.2 State Government Educational Services 6.1 -6.2 Total Local Government 20.8 0 Local Government Educational Services 11.8 0 Workers in Labor /Management Disputes 0.0 0.0 Source: Washington State Employment Security Department Adopted April 25, 2006 (Update 06- 06 -12) Chapter 7 - Economic Development Page 3 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan The Spokane MSA has experienced a decrease in employment over the previous three years, as indicated in Figure 7.1. During the same period, the local unemployment rate has declined, as indicated in Figure 7.2. Figure 7.1. Non -Farm Employment Trends Source: Washington State Employment Security Department, Labor Market and Economic Analysis Branch Figure 7.2 Unemployment Trends Source: Washington State Employment Security Department, Labor Market and Economic Analysis Branch The 2009 -2019 employment forecast by industry for Spokane County is shown on Table 7.3. The highest growth is expected in the fields of computers and mathematics, followed by building and grounds maintenance and personal care and service occupations. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Update 06- 06 -12) Chapter 7 — Economic Development Page 4 of 18 Table 7.3 Employment Forecasts Avg. Annual Avg. Annual Opening Due to Avg. Annual Show All Occupations Estimated Employment Growth Rate Growth Total Openings Occupation Group 2009 2014 2019 2009 -14 2014 -19 2009 -14 2014 -19 2009 -14 2014 -19 TOTAL ALL OCCUPATIONS 231,053 246,731 265,391 1.30% 1.50% 3,126 3,702 8,507 9,454 MANAGEMENT 8,562 9,099 9,711 1.20% 1.30% 109 120 292 356 BUSINESS AND FINANCIAL OPERATIONS 8,754 91409 10,008 1.50% 1.20% 129 118 296 331 COMPUTER AND MATHEMATICAL 4,059 4,575 5,226 2.40% 2.70% 102 129 177 228 ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING 3,174 3,389 31719 1.30% 1.90% 46 65 105 141 LIFE, PHYSICAL, AND SOCIAL SCIENCE 1,908 2,031 2,227 1.30% 1.90% 1 25 38 81 98 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Update 06- 06 -12) Chapter 7 — Economic Development Page 4 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 7.3 Employment Forecasts Percent Employment by Category within Spokane Valley (in thousands) Spokane Valley County Avg. Annual Management, Professional and Related Occupations 11.3 71.2 Avg. Annual Opening Due to Avg. Annual Show All Occupations Estimated Employment Growth Rate Growth Total Openings Occupation Group 2009 2014 2019 2009 -14 2014 -19 2009 -14 2014 -19 2009 -14 2014 -19 COMMUNITY AND SOCIAL SERVICES 5,577 51854 6,310 1% 1.50% 55 90 164 228 LEGAL 1,984 2,126 2,253 1.40% 1.20% 28 25 59 65 EDUCATION, TRAINING, AND LIBRARY 14,295 1 15,056 16,049 1% 1 1.30% 148 1 195 436 541 ARTS, DESIGN, AND MEDIA 4,107 4,324 4,553 1% 1% 42 43 158 169 HEALTHCARE PRACTITIONERS AND TECHNICAL 15,907 17,127 19,085 1.50% 2.20% 239 392 1 529 794 HEALTHCARE SUPPORT 8,073 8,545 9,315 1.10% 1.70% 94 153 177 276 PROTECTIVE SERVICE 4,696 4,918 5,269 0.90% 1.40% 44 69 202 213 FOOD PREPARATION AND SERVING 18,654 19,389 20,338 0.80% 1% 150 188 895 754 BUILDING AND GROUNDS CLEANING 9,920 11,113 12,267 2.30% 2% 240 230 397 439 PERSONAL CARE AND SERVICE 11,436 12,594 13,975 1 1.90% 2.10% 233 274 544 571 SALES AND RELATED OCCUPATIONS 25,835 27,669 29,233 1.40% 1.10% 368 311 1,206 1,029 OFFICE AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT 37,200 1 39,810 42,578 1.40% 1.40% 521 552 1,302 1,406 FARMING, FISHING, AND FORESTRY 861 872 890 0.30% 0.40% 2 4 25 25 CONSTRUCTION AND EXTRACTION 11,932 12,152 13,425 0.40% 2% 40 251 233 503 INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, AND REPAIR 9,074 9,586 10,051 1.10% 1% 99 94 266 309 PRODUCTION OCCUPATIONS 1 11,522 1 12,665 1 13,551 1 1.90% 1 1.40% 1 232 1 175 1 465 1 440 TRANSPORTATION AND MATERIAL MOVING 13,523 1 14,428 1 15,358 1 1.30% 1 1.30% 180 186 498 538 Source: Workforce Explorer, Washington State Employment Security Department, Labor Market and Economic Analysis Branch Table 7.4 estimates the type of employment by job classes within Spokane Valley, compared to the County and State. In 2010, the majority of jobs were in sales as well as management and professional occupations. Table 7.4 Occupations of the City of Spokane Valley Area Residents, 2010 Census Percent Employment by Category within Spokane Valley (in thousands) Spokane Valley County State Management, Professional and Related Occupations 11.3 71.2 11183.0 Service Occupations 6.4 41.4 538.4 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Update 06- 06 -12) Chapter 7 — Economic Development Page 5 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 7.4 Occupations of the City of Spokane Valley Area Residents, 2010 Census Percent Employment by Category within Spokane Valley (in thousands) Spokane Valley County State Sales and Office Occupations 12.7 58.7 715.6 Natural Resources, Construction and Maintenance 3.6 14.4 295.1 Production, Transportation and Material Moving Occupations 6.9 25.3 337.9 Total 40.9 j 211.0 j 3,070.0 Source: American Fact Finder, 2010 Census Taxable sales within Spokane Valley by business category are shown in Figure 7.3 and Table 7.5. Accommodatic &Food Service 9.6 Constrt 6.f Figure 7.3 2010 Taxable Sales by Business Category Retail Trade, 63.91 J administrative, Waste Wholesale Information, 3.81 I Rental & Keai tsiaie Management, Trade, 5.18 Remediation Other Manufacturing, Leasing, Services, 1.49 Services, 5.46 1.99 1.72 rs Table 7.5 2010 Taxable Sales by Business Category Category Total Taxable Sales Percent of Total Agriculture, Fishing, F restry 465,244 0.03 Utilities 158,527 0.01 Construction 108,424,546 6.84 Manufacturing 31,595,586 1.99 Wholesale Trade 82,092,127 5.18 Retail Trade 1,012,831,614 63.91 Transportation and Warehousing 1,625,684 0.10 Information 60,372,526 3.81 Finance and Insurance 8,407,401 0.53 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Update 06- 06 -12) Page 6 of 18 Chapter 7 - Economic Development City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 7.5 2010 Taxable Sales by Business Category Real Estate Rental and Leasing 27,185,713 1.72 Professional, Scientific and Technical 12,140,247 0.77 Administrative & Support and Waste Management & remediation Services 23,560,170 1.49 Educational Services 1,190,899 0.08 Health Care and Social Assistance 3,386,226 0.21 Arts, Entertainment and Recreation 7,974,085 0.50 Accommodation and Food Services 152,221,399 9.60 Other Services 51,041,524 3.22 Public Administration 215,261 0.01 The gross taxable sales for the City, from 2004 to 2010, are shown in Figure 7.4 and Table 7.6. 2,000,000,000 1,800,000,000 1,600,000,000 1,400,000,000 1,200,000,000 1,000,000,000 800,000,000 600,000,000 400,000,000 200,000,000 0 m2( Figure 7.4 Gross Taxable Sales Table 7.6 Gross Taxable Sales 2004 — 2010 Year Total Taxable Sales 2004 1, 539, 680, 299 2005 1,731,672,576 2006 1,882,594,225 2007 1, 966, 515, 200 2008 1, 797, 852,179 2009 1, 613, 410,134 2010 1, 585, 010, 451 Source: Spokane Community Indicators Adopted April 25, 2006 (Update 06- 06 -12) Chapter 7 — Economic Development Page 7 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan A comparison of the County of Spokane, City of Spokane and Spokane Valley gross taxable sales and annual growth rate is illustrated in Figure 7.5. Figure 7.5 Total Taxable Retail Sales and Annual Growth Rate: City Data 5.00 - 4.00 3.t10 m 0 2.00 H 3.00 ►�1 0.04 - r. 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2004 2007 2000 20D9 2010 Year . Tntal Retail Salo [Billions], City of Spokane Total Retail Sal as (Oil 11 on3), City of Spokane Valley . Annual Growth Rafe, Spokane County . {annual Growth flat@, City of Spokane Annual Growth Rate, City of Spokane Valley 25.0% 20.0% 15.41 p m 10.096 a n 5.0 °Io a in 0.0% m -U% - 10096 Year City of Spokane Valley City of Spokane County of Spokane 2004 Taxable Retail Sales (in billions) 1.54 3.29 N/A Annual Growth Rate N/A 2.2% 5.9% 2005 Taxable Retail Sales (in 1.73 3.48 N/A billions) Annual Growth Rate 12.5% 5.7% 7.9% 2006 Taxable Retail Sales (in 1.88 3.84 N/A billions) Annual Growth Rate 8.7% 10.3% 9.2% 2007 Taxable Retail Sales (in 1.97 4.00 N/A billions) Annual Growth Rate 4.5% 4.5% 5.6% 2008 Taxable Retail Sales (in 1.80 3.92 N/A billions) Annual Growth Rate -8.6% -2.1% -4.2% 2009 Taxable Retail Sales (in 1.61 3.73 N/A billions) Annual Growth Rate -8.3% -4.9% -6.9% 2010 Taxable Retail Sales (in billions) 1.59 3.67 N/A Annual Growth Rate -1.8% -1.4% -1.8% Adopted April 25, 2006 (Update 06- 06 -12) Page 8 of 18 Chapter 7 - Economic Development City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Property taxes are part of the cost of doing business. The 2011 Property taxes in Spokane Valley include County, City, Library Bond, State School, Fire District and local school taxes, as illustrated in Table 7.7, for individual Tax Code Areas (TCA) Table 7.7 2011 Property Tax Rates within Spokane Valley per $1,000 valuation Levy Rate TCA 140 TCA 141 TCA 144 TCA 145 TCA 146 TCA 148 County: General 1.195057 'f 1000 Conservation Futures 0.044188 500 _ Road 1.332306 2004 2005 City of Spokane Valley 1.503003 • Commercial 289 86 50 79 95 State School 2.241034 67 • Multi - Family 0 711 15 5 Library 0.50000000 16 • Single Family /Duplex 2971 396 457 Subtotal 6.815588 6.815588 6.815588 6.815588 6.815588 6.815588 6.815588 SD 081 Spokane 5.654338 5.654338 5.654338 SD 356 Central Valley 4.490794 4.4907944 4.490794 SD 361 East Valley 3.538868 3.538868 SD 363 West Valley 6.633464 6.633464 Fire 01 Spokane Valley 3.157323 3.157323 3.157323 3.157323 3.157323 Fire /EMS 08 Moran 1 2.121076 1 1 2.121076 1 1 2.121076 Total 1 1 15.627249 1 14.591002 1 14.463705 1 13.427458 1 13.511779 1 16.606375 Source: SpoKane county Assessor Figure 7.6 New Construction Permits Issued W 2500 2000 1500 'f 1000 500 _ 0 2004 2005 2006T2007 2008 2010 2011 • Commercial 289 86 50 79 95 69 67 • Multi - Family 0 711 15 5 16 0 16 • Single Family /Duplex 2971 396 457 539 344 94 126 96 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Update 06- 06 -12) Page 9 of 18 Chapter 7 - Economic Development City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $0 Figure 7.8 Permit Revenue ki 42004 ■ 2005 2006 2007 ■ 2008 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 Tables 7.8 and 7.9 show the largest office / business parks and the leading industrial parks in the City of Spokane Valley, ranked by total square footage. Table 7.8 Largest Spokane Valley Office and Business Parks (Ranked by total square footage) Park Name /Address Total Square Footage Space Available as of Number of 1 -1 -12 Buildings Pinecroft Business Park 350,000 DND 12 12310 — 12825 E. Mirabeau Parkway Riverview Corporate Center 250,000 158,000 1 16021 E. Indiana Redwood Plaza 107,400 12,900 3 11707 E. Sprague CenterPointe Business Park 68,000 10,000 3 200 N. Mullan Argonne Mullan Plaza 54,000 8,000 2 920 N. Mullan Montgomery East Commercial Center 53,000 11,710 4 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Update 06- 06 -12) Chapter 7 — Economic Development Page 10 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 7.8 Largest Spokane Valley Office and Business Parks (Ranked by total square footage) Park Name /Address Total Square Footage Space Available as of Number of Number of Zoning 1 -1 -12 Buildings 11616 E. Montgomery Size(acres) Buildings Broadway Avenue Business Park 52,700 17,000 4 5501 E. Broadway LI 3808 N. Sullivan North Valley Business Park 51,300 6,390 3 11303, 11306 & 11327 E. Montgomery 513,000 180,000 300 North Pines Center 51,000 2,000 6 1014 N. Pines Argonne Forrest Office Park 44,360 3,860 3 8815 - 8775 E. Mission 1 Broadway and Fancher Mullan Center 43,000 4,200 2 1410 & 1420 N. Mullan 105,800 4,100 6.8 North Pines Professional Center 37,580 8,940 7 1005 N. Pines Montgomery CommerCenter 29,050 2,300 2 2721 N. Van Marter HI 18001 E. Euclid Boulder Creek 25,000 2,300 2 505 N. Argonne 95,600 9,000 18 Argonne Mullan Center 20,000 775 2 708 & 720 N. Argonne Pinestone Business Center 7,900 1,550 3 2310 -2314 N. Cherry LI 12009 E. Empire Source: January 2012 Book of Lists, Spokane County Journal of Business Table 7.9 Leading Industrial Parks (Ranked by total square footage) Park Name Total Square Space Available Park Number of Zoning Address Footage as of 1 -1 -12 Size(acres) Buildings Spokane Business and Industrial Park 3,800,000 425,000 615 55 LI 3808 N. Sullivan Central Business Park 513,000 180,000 300 26 LI 11016 E. Montgomery East Spokane Industrial Park 110,000 none 8.5 5 1 Broadway and Fancher Montgomery Business Park 105,800 4,100 6.8 2 LI 9922 E. Montgomery Bielec Industrial Park 105,000 25,000 14.5 4 HI 18001 E. Euclid Vista Industrial Park 95,600 9,000 18 8 HI 111 N. Vista Empire Industrial Park 90,000 2,200 7.5 13 LI 12009 E. Empire Trent Center 56,700 none 4.2 7 LI 6206 E. Trent Argonne Commercial Center 56,600 5,100 2.4 3 LI 9516 - 9608 E. Montgomery Fancher Bridge Business Park 56,000 15,300 3 5 HI 5805 E. Sharp Carstens Industrial Park 48,000 none 5 3 1 415 N. Thierman Van Marter Warehouse 45,000 none 3 1 LI 2701 N. Van Marter Farr Industrial Park 44,500 none 3.6 3 LI 9708 E. Montgomery Ella Industrial park 40,000 none 3 6 1 525 N. Ella Thierman Warehouse 30,000 none 1.5 2 HI 1419 and 1507 N. Thierman Alki Industrial Park 13,000 1,800 DND 2 HI 6002 - 6010 E. Alki includes office and felx space I Industrial; HI Heavy Industrial; LI Light Industrial; DND did not disclose; FTE means full -time equivalent; NA means not available Source: January 2012 Book of Lists, Spokane County Journal of Business Adopted April 25, 2006 (Update 06- 06 -12) Chapter 7 - Economic Development Page 11 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan The largest employers within the City of Spokane Valley are summarized in Table 7.10. Table 7.10 Largest Spokane Valley Employers (Ranked by number of full time equivalent employees) Name FTE Employees FTE Employees Parent Organization, Business Spokane Valley Elsewhere Location Activity 11/1/11 11/1/10 11/1/11 11/1/10 Wal -Mart Stores 1,332 1,362 DND DND Wal -Mart Stores, Inc. Retail Sales Bentonville, AK Central Valley School 1,248 1,245 0 0 Spokane Valley Public School District Kaiser Aluminum 850 800 DND DND Foothill Ranch, CA Aluminum Production Valley Hospital 485 457 0 0 Spokane Hospital /Health Care Yokes Foods, Inc. 426 408 317 282 Spokane Valley Retail Grocery Appleway Automotive 360 340 18,000 17,500 AutoNation, Inc. Auto Sales, Group Ft. Lauderdale, FL Service, Repair Spokane Industries, 282 211 3 3 Spokane Valley Stainless Steel Inc. Products Wagstaff, Inc. 279 259 67 66 Spokane Valley Machinery Design and Manufacturing SCAFCO Corp. 200 225 66 47 Spokane Valley Grain Storage System Manufacturing Alliance Machine 176 201 206 DND Spokane Valley Corrugated Box System International Handling and LLC Machines KeyTronicEMS 176 166 2,480 1,842 Spokane Valley Contract Manufacturing Good Samaritan 175 168 27,000 27,000 Sioux Falls, SD Retirement Society Community Principal Financial 169 177 DND 14,200 Des Moines, IA Investment, Group Insurance, Banking Hotstart, Inc. 166 162 6 4 Spokane Valley Engine Heaters Servatron Inc. 163 160 0 0 Spokane Valley Electronic Manufacturing Cascade Windows 162 200 374 200 Spokane Valley Vinyl Window Manufacturing DND did not disclose; FTE full -time equivalent; NA not available Source: January 2012 Book of Lists, Spokane County Journal of Business 7.3 Strengths & Weaknesses 7.3.1 Strengths Spokane Valley is sheltered from harsh continental climate by the Cascades and Bitterroot Mountain Ranges, and has a mild climate with four seasons. Its proximity to Idaho and the mountains provides excellent recreational opportunities throughout the year. Sportsmen appreciate the opportunities for hunting and fishing within the Inland Northwest. Spokane Valley is strategically located along Interstate -90 with an excellent transportation system linking air freight, rail and freight terminals. It has an ample supply of land designated for commercial and industrial purposes. Plentiful vacant and underdeveloped land is located in close proximity to the scenic Spokane River. The Spokane Industrial Park located on SR 290 (Trent Road) houses a 325,000 square foot Foreign Trade Zone (FTZ) designated by the U.S. Department of Commerce in November 2002 and activated in February 2004. The Spokane International Airport System allocated the FTZ from Felts Field to its present location in Spokane Valley. FTZ benefits importers by allowing them to defer import duties on shipments until the cargo is transshipped to another location within the United States, or to avoid those duties when imported freight is exported out of the country. Inland Empire Distribution Systems (IEDS) operates the FTZ, Adopted April 25, 2006 (Update 06- 06 -12) Chapter 7 — Economic Development Page 12 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan providing third party logistics and a public warehouse. The FTZ is also the site of the only U.S. Customs authorized Container Freight Station (CFS) which allows sealed in -bound containers to clear Customs in Spokane Valley. CFS is a federal service provided to individuals and businesses through the Spokane /Coeur d'Alene area. IEDS also provides the only public railroad transloader service in the Inland Northwest (Spokane /CDA Area) for both the BNSF and Union Pacific Railroads. Because of its location adjacent to the City of Spokane, Spokane Valley may be eligible to seek expansion of the Spokane Community Empowerment Zone for qualified Census block groups. Expansion of the Empowerment Zone will allow participating businesses to take advantage of sales tax deferrals and Washington business and occupation tax credits in exchange for expanding the employment opportunities available to low and moderate income individuals residing within the area. A wide variety of retail outlets provide goods for the region. Of major importance in Spokane Valley are automotive and recreational vehicle sales concentrated along Sprague Avenue at I -90. These businesses and others in manufacturing, service, transportation, and wholesale /distribution are well represented by the Valley Chamber of Commerce, the sixth largest chamber in the State of Washington, which boasts over 900 members. (Valley Chamber 2010 Annual Report) The Spokane area hosts a number of accredited institutions of higher education including community colleges, universities (both public and private) and private technical and business schools. Local K -12 public and private school programs have sought partnerships with these institutions to meet the training needs of a future work force. These institutions, particularly the community college system, have been active in seeking to meet the re- training needs of older workers displaced by losses of manufacturing jobs, and are receptive to developing partnerships with the local business community. Among these, the Spokane Intercollegiate Research and Technology Institute ( SIRTI) is a Washington State - funded, economic development agency that advances the growth of emerging technology companies in the Inland Northwest. SIRTI's commercialization services aim at helping clients bring innovative technologies to market while positioning them to compete globally. These services include: strategic planning, market research, business plan development, marketing, connections to technology managerial talent, and access to funding sources, as well as providing flexible, state -of- the -art incubator facilities. SIRTI also helps to build the Northwest's technology workforce by providing paid internships to eligible students from regional colleges and universities. The Small Business Development Center (SBDC) is a cooperative effort between Washington State University and the US Small Business Administration. Counselors provide one -on -one, confidential assistance at no charge for management and technical business affairs, such as start, purchase or the sale of a business, choosing and incorporating new technology, financial management, business plan development, market plan development, and business research. In 2010, small businesses in Washington State saw their sales decrease an average of one percent. However, clients who worked with SBDC advisors saw their sales increase an average of nearly four percent. (SBDC, 2011) Advances in technology and local investment in fiber -optic cable networks represent a significant competitive advantage in attracting information -based business to Spokane Valley. Spokane Valley is also the beneficiary of high quality medical facilities which serve a wide region, extending beyond Washington. The presence of these facilities has attracted a large number of active retirees who represent a well- educated and highly - skilled resource for local employers. Housing in the Spokane Valley is of high quality and affordable in all density ranges. Local utility purveyors at rates that are reasonable provide plentiful water and power. In addition to the many businesses focused on the prosperity of Spokane Valley, the City is fortunate to have a large number of professional, volunteer, service and faith -based organizations committed to community development and improvement. Citizens are engaged in the development Adopted April 25, 2006 (Update 06- 06 -12) Chapter 7 — Economic Development Page 13 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan of the new city and have dedicated countless hours to developing ideas which would promote economic development and job creation. Another important piece of the regional economic development picture is Greater Spokane Inc. (formerly Spokane Area Economic Development Council). . Since 1974, Greater Spokane Inc. (GSI) has established a proven record of accomplishment, strong leadership, and solid industry expertise as "the starting point" for regionally focused economic development. The role of GSI is to implement a business - focused strategy that proactively promotes the region's business identity, facilitates job growth and business expansion, and leverages available resources to provide effective solutions. While organized as an independent not - for - profit corporation funded by both public and private entities, GSI works collaboratively with key partners across the region. Spokane Neighborhood Action Programs (SNAP) provides programs to empower low income individuals and families with opportunities promoting financial independence. The SNAP Economic Development programs offer financial tools and education to promote sound money management and investment in assets, including business ownership, home ownership, higher education and transportation. The MicroEnterprise Development Program is operated by SNAP, along with public and private partners, to help qualified individuals develop a business plan, acquire capital and start or expand a business. Perhaps the most important aspect of economic development is the City's continuing efforts to streamline the permitting process and to ensure regulations are fair and predictable for businesses. Efficient permitting processes are a key factor for companies searching for suitable locations to build or expand their business operations. In order to remain competitive, the City must continually evaluate its permitting process to ensure a timely and predictable outcome. Regulations must also be continually monitored and amended as necessary to make sure the City is not unduly burdening businesses. 7.3.2 Weaknesses The City of Spokane Valley has yet to establish its own unique identity within the region. The lack of an identifiable city center and an overabundance of marginal commercial centers and strip development from an earlier era remain a part of the urban landscape. While they represent opportunities for redevelopment, they present very real challenges for economic development in the present. The costs of redevelopment are significantly higher than those with new development, and regulatory barriers often represent considerable obstacles to reinvestment in an aged infrastructure. Property subdivided in the past may need to be reassembled to meet development objectives at a significant cost to the investor in both time and money. The development experience of the last twenty years has shown the importance of attracting the proper tenant mix in a successful commercial project. To be successful today, retail development must be clean, well lit, landscaped and attractive, with convenient parking. More importantly, it must be perceived as safe with easy access. Existing buildings and properties are often not easily redeveloped to meet this criterion. Land development in the Spokane Valley has not had the advantages of urban planning at critical periods in its development. As a result, incompatibilities exist between adjacent land uses. This will be corrected over time as the City directs its own development. Development standards of the past have focused on rural rather than the urban types of development now mandated by the Growth Management Act. In some cases, the area continues to experience the effects of poor environmental practices in the past. As the information age advances, industrial development has moved from traditional manufacturing activities to business parks which combine corporate offices, call centers and electronic assembly of parts in an office /campus environment. Traditional warehousing has been replaced with "just in time" delivery and an increased dependence on efficient transportation movements. Business reliance on Internet access has replaced other more traditional methods of communication and sales. Unfortunately, many industrial properties have yet to be retrofitted to different standards. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Update 06- 06 -12) Chapter 7 — Economic Development Page 14 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Because the historical economic base was predicated on manufacturing, as is the case within the entire Spokane area, the local labor force has not always adapted quickly enough to these changes in market conditions. Losses in manufacturing have displaced local workers without the skills required for work in highly technical jobs. Spokane Valley's location, only minutes from the Idaho state line, represents a significant challenge to local economic development efforts. The many services supported by the State of Washington's complex wage and tax structure place business and industrial development at a competitive disadvantage when compared with similar ventures in Idaho only a few miles away. Many of these weaknesses may be more perceived than real, but all have contributed to an image which will require time and focused community effort to correct. 7.4 Community Survey The statistically valid Community Survey conducted in the spring of 2004 identified economic growth as the single most important issue facing Spokane, followed closely by job creation and urban planning issues. Sixty -one percent of respondents also felt that having a city center was important to the City's future, and seventy -four percent supported spending public funds to create a city center. Not surprisingly, roughly three quarters of survey respondents felt that the establishment of a unique community identity in the City of Spokane Valley was important. Although nearly half of respondents (47 %) felt that the development of a community identity could best be accomplished through social changes, another 28% indicated physical changes would be the best way to develop a community identity. One - quarter of respondents (25 %) felt physical and social changes were equally important to the development of a community identity. During community workshops conducted in the spring and early summer of 2004, participants were asked to express their opinions on many of the same issues. Results of these informal surveys generally tracked the results of the larger survey. 7.5 Goals and Policies This section provides goals and policies that support cooperation and coordination at a regional level to ensure sustainable economic development. There are a number of established organizations in the region that are engaged in economic development activities. It is in the best interest of the City of Spokane Valley to collaborate with these regional organizations. By focusing on common goals and allocating resources accordingly, government and private organizations can work together regionally to maximize successful business start -up, retention, expansion and recruitment efforts. As with many cities, Spokane Valley will have limited funds with which to pursue its economic development goals. The City will have to use its resources in a focused and prioritized manner to have a positive impact on the local economic base. It will be imperative that Spokane Valley make strategic investments of the limited resources available and where possible, leverage resources in cooperation with other governmental and private agencies. Goal EDG -1 Encourage diverse and mutually supportive business development and the expansion and retention of existing businesses within the City for the purpose of emphasizing economic vitality, stability and sustainability. Policies EDP -1.1 Strive to provide the necessary public facilities, infrastructure and services to support economic development. EDP -1.2 In conjunction with appropriate entities, encourage market feasibility studies to identify and target economic opportunities. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Update 06- 06 -12) Chapter 7 — Economic Development Page 15 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan EDP -1.3 In partnership with the business community and appropriate entities, encourage the development of a comprehensive marketing strategy customized for Spokane Valley and supportive of regional economic development objectives. EDP -1.4 Consider establishment of a public interactive web -based geographic information system to facilitate economic research for businesses. EDP -1.5 Encourage the development of business incubators to promote the creation of new business enterprises. EDP -1.6 Encourage creation and retention of home -based businesses that are consistent with neighborhood character. EDP -1.7 Encourage State and Federal agencies to locate in the City of Spokane Valley. EDP -1.8 Encourage local organizations engaged in business retention, expansion and recruitment. EDP -1.9 Encourage public and private programs and activities that diversify the economy and labor force. EDP -1.10 Encourage the full utilization and expansion of the Foreign Trade Zone. EDP -1.11 Seek expansion of the Spokane Community Empowerment Zone to include income - eligible Census block groups within the City of Spokane Valley. EDP -1.12 Continue to work with auto dealership stakeholders to develop unique streetscape designs, lighting and signage that further define the AutoRow area as regional destination. Goal EDG -2 Encourage redevelopment of commercial /industrial properties Adopted April 25, 2006 (Update 06- 06 -12) Page 16 of 18 Chapter 7 — Economic Development within the City. Policies EDP -2.1 Develop appropriate urban design and infrastructure standards for the City Center area. EDP -2.2 Develop zoning, permitting, and incentives that encourage prioritized development consistent with the SVCP. EDP -2.3 Focus economic development resources through specific redevelopment areas as appropriate. Goal EDG -3 Promote the development of a qualified labor force that is globally competitive and responds to the changing needs of the workplace. Policies EDP -3.1 Encourage the region's excellent education consortium. EDP -3.2 Encourage post- secondary education and technical schools to locate and expand offerings within the City of Spokane Valley. EDP -3.3 Encourage community colleges and technical schools in the development of customized training programs for businesses. EDP -3.4 Encourage K -12 education to include skills -based training and creative partnerships with business. EDP -3.5 Encourage public /private partnerships in training and education, through continuing employee education. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Update 06- 06 -12) Page 16 of 18 Chapter 7 — Economic Development City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan EDP -3.6 Encourage cooperation among businesses, schools, labor unions and other organizations in developing job training through apprenticeships, mentoring and other programs. EDP -3.7 Promote opportunities that employ Spokane Valley residents in Spokane Valley. Goal EDG -4 Encourage regional tourism as a sustainable provider of jobs and markets. Policies EDP -4.1 Encourage the development of a comprehensive tourism promotion plan that supports the marketing efforts of regional tourism agencies, attractions and events. EDP -4.2 Encourage the development of local attractions, recreational, cultural and sports events which take advantage of the four seasons. EDP -4.3 Encourage and promote the marketing of appropriate facilities that are consistent with Spokane Valley's tourism objectives. EDP -4.4 Expand and develop neighborhood and regional linkages and improvements to the Centennial Trail and Spokane River frontage. Goal EDG -5 Collaborate with other governmental agencies and the business community to promote a sustainable, strong, diverse and healthy regional economy. Policies EDP -5.1 Improve the effectiveness of capital improvement programs by encouraging greater communication and coordination between local governments and the private sector. EDP -5.2 Develop and implement strategies to identify and use appropriate Federal, State and regional economic resources and incentives. EDP -5.3 Encourage the continued support and funding of active duty, reserves and National Guard components of the United States Armed Forces. EDP -5.4 Collaborate with other local governments and business organizations in promoting legislation in support of economic development when appropriate. EDP -5.5 Encourage development of and participation in a recognition /certification program for businesses and non - profits moving toward local, sustainable practices in their operations. EDP -5.6 Encourage development of and participation in a "buy local" campaign. Goal EDG -6 Establish a balanced approach to environmental sustainability which complements the utilization of area resources and economic growth. Policies EDP -6.1 Encourage the retention, development and recruitment of environmentally friendly businesses. EDP -6.2 Encourage programs that foster and promote sustainable business practices. EDP -6.3 Encourage the development of clean technologies. Goal EDG -7 Maintain a regulatory environment that offers flexibility, consistency, predictability and clear direction. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Update 06- 06 -12) Chapter 7 — Economic Development Page 17 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Policies EDP -7.1 Evaluate, monitor and improve development standards to promote compatibility between adjacent land uses; and update permitting processes to ensure that they are equitable, cost - effective, and expeditious. EDP -7.2 Review development regulations periodically to ensure clarity, consistency and predictability. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Update 06- 06 -12) Chapter 7 — Economic Development Page 18 of 18 - - - -- Map 7.1 2012 Development Activity illy of Spokane ; Legend _ 290 Urban Growth Boundary City of Spokane Valley sp - Iz ' 1 City of Mill od 0 Other Municipalities , Permits 1 * New Commercial 1 1 New Residential Tenant Improvement Ciiy of ' 'Liberty LandActions (Plats andRezones) MF7� 1 Lake eIF J 1 1 ' 1 1 —40P -- — — 1 , w TTT- LOIt¢ L 1�1 ' J / \ _ -LL 1 1 1 ' 1 1 1 - - - - -1 \\ 1 1 Map Location —\ 1 v 1 (27. ' Effective Date: 6 /06/2012 1 Ordinance No.: 12 -014 4✓ 4 •+ --IGJ /e\ \ 1 �iiru-''^nle� P 0 005 1 2 Miles \ The information shown on this map it ompiled from various ' ' v s and is subject to constant revision. The City makes no claims \ \ or guarantees about the accuracy or currency ofthis map and expressly disclaims liability for errors and omissions in its contents. / To confirm accuracy contact the City of Spokane Valley, Community ' Development Department Division of Planing, (509) 921 -1000. ` Pcud. —dw, c.,.f Spokane —wy, --ity r— .pmeu[D ep.—t City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan CHAPTER 10 — NEIGHBORHOODS 10.0 Introduction Neighborhoods — their character, their livability, their development — these are some of the vital elements of the attractiveness of a city. Neighborhoods are the most immediate symbols of the context in which we live our lives. Empowering neighbors to make their neighborhoods safer, healthier and more economically vibrant is vital to GRGGHrage— establish a sense of control and IDaaaRse- rip de. � of +ho ��eia While many of the complex issues and opportunities facing the City are addressed effectively at the city -wide level, others require a more specific solution. In addition, neighborhoods and sub -areas may face unique issues which differ from those in other parts of the community. 10.1 Planning Context The Washington Growth Management Act' and Washington Administrative Code (WAC) provide for the inclusion of optional elements2 relating to physical development in the Comprehensive Plan. Neighborhood and sub -area plans may be included, provided they are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The initial adoption of a neighborhood /sub -area plan that does not otherwise modify the comprehensive plan policies and designations applicable to the sub -area is not limited to the annual update and may be enacted at any time 3. 10.2 Neighborhood /Sub -Area Planning 10.2.1 Purpose. Neighborhood /sub -area plans should be used to create, enhance or maintain civic identity and to revitalize under - utilized areas. Infill development is the process of developing or redeveloping under - utilized parcels of land within existing urban areas that are already provided with services. Infill development policies help utilize existing utilities and services before considering costly extensions. Neighborhood /sub -area plans include plans for residential neighborhoods, industrial /commercial development, mixed -use development and joint planning areas. The adoption and incorporation of neighborhood /sub -area plans into the Comprehensive Plan adds greater detail, guidance and predictability to the Plan. This chapter of the Comprehensive Plan provides Neighborhood /sub -area organizations a tool to provide advisory input to city government regarding all issues of governance in their respective geographic area. By accepting this advisory input, the City Council may receive greater citizen input in its decision and policy- making endeavors. A Neighborhood /sub -area is a geographic neighborhood /sub -area within the City of Spokane Valley and could include adjacent jurisdictions and joint planning areas. The extent of a neighborhood is variable and may be defined by tradition, historic uses, common interests and uses, period of building and development, or subdivision patterns. Neighborhood boundaries may include such features as major streets, natural geographic boundaries or other physical features. A neighborhood -based organization is an entity composed of individuals, businesses and /or institutions associated with one or more specific neighborhoods that are recognized by the City as a partner in communicating information and providing assistance in securing public participation. Neighborhood /sub -area planning will provide stakeholders a greater opportunity to be involved in a planning process that is more identifiable and predictable. Local residents, business owners and property owners will gain a clearer understanding of the potential changes that may affect their neighborhoods. ' RCW 36.70A.080 2 WAC 365- 195 -345 3 RCW 36.70A.130 Adopted April 25, 2006 Page 1 of 3 Chapter 10 — Neighborhood /Sub -area City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 10.2.2 Process. Guidelines and options will be developed for the planning process in the development of neighborhood /sub -area plans. 10.3 Goals and Policies Goal NG -1 Maintain consistency between adopted Neighborhood /sub -area plans and the City Comprehensive Plan. Policies NP -1.1 Conduct periodic review of sub -area plans for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Goal NG -2 Preserve and protect the character and quality of life of Spokane Valley's residential neighborhoods. Policies NP -2.1 Maintain and protect the character of existing and future residential neighborhoods through the development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations and joint planning. NP -2.2 Review and revise as necessary, existing land use regulations to provide for innovation and flexibility in the design of new residential developments, accessory dwelling units, and in -fill development. NP -2.3 Encourage the development of parks and the dedication of open space to Promote physical activity and community interaction in and adjacent to residential areas. Open space dedication shall be proportionate to the size of the development. NP -2.4 Encourage the dedication of open spaces for local food production in and adjacent to residential areas. NP -2.5 Encourage the location of farmers markets within walking distance of residential areas to support access to healthy food. NP -2.6 Encourage community gardens in residential areas. NP -2.47 Preserve site characteristics that enhance residential development (trees, bodies of water, vistas, and similar features) using site planning techniques such as clustering, planned unit developments, transfer of development rights, and lot size averaging. NP -2.58 Allow zone changes within the Low Density Residential category only when specific criteria are met. Criteria may include: • Substantial changes within zone change area. • Clear mapping errors. • Adequate facilities and services (e.g. sewer, water capacity). • Consistency with densities in the vicinity of the zone change. NP -2.49 Establish appropriate design guidelines with buffer zones and transition requirements to protect residential neighborhoods from incompatible land uses and adverse impacts associated with arterials, freeways and rail corridors. NP -2.7-10 Encourage rehabilitation and improvement programs to conserve and upgrade existing properties and buildings. Adopted April 25, 2006 Page 2 of 3 Chapter 10 — Neighborhood /Sub -area City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan NP -2.911 Encourage programs targeted at neighborhood preservation, including Weed and Seed, housing rehabilitation and crime prevention programs, such as Neighborhood Watch, McGruff Houses, etc. NP -2.412 Integrate retail developments into surrounding neighborhoods through attention to quality design and function. Encourage neighborhood retail and personal services that create a sense of community such as farmers markets, seasonal businesses, and family - friendly gathering places to locate at appropriate sites where local economic demand and design solutions demonstrate compatibility with the neighborhood. NP- 2.4813 Develop guidelines and options for Neighborhood /sub -area associations which facilitate the refinement of Neighborhood /sub -area plans. Goal NG -3 Encourage neighborhood /sub -area planning for commercial, industrial and mixed use properties to enhance the quality, vibrancy and character of existing development. Policies NP -3.1 Establish regulations and identify potential incentives that encourage multi -use areas that integrate a broad range of appropriate and compatible land use activities, and encourage the development and redevelopment of land in conformance with the SVCP. NP -3.2 Encourage the remediation of environmentally contaminated sites to return the land to productive commercial and industrial use. NP -3.3 Encourage commercial development that is designed and scaled in a manner that is compatible with surrounding neighborhoods. Goal NG -4 Work with Neighborhoods /sub -areas to determine the need_, if , and the preferred approach for outreach activities in order to maintain the flow of information between the city and its citizens. Policies NP -4.1 Work with schools and non - profit organizations to identify and address housing, food resources and neighborhood concerns. Adopted April 25, 2006 Page 3 of 3 Chapter 10 — Neighborhood /Sub -area City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan CHAPTER 11- BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN ELEMENT 11.0 Introduction 11.0.1 Why Plan for Bicycling and Walking? Bicycling in urban areas has grown dramatically in the last decade due to factors such as healthier lifestyles, rising fuel costs and a desire to lessen impacts on the environment. By creating safe places to ride, the development of new facility types such as bike lanes, bicycle friendly routes, and shared use paths have enabled more people to use bike transportation. In addition, as the importance of a healthy lifestyle has grown, the desire to incorporate exercise through walking has also grown. As a basic form of mobility, virtually all trips — regardless of mode —start and end with walking. The City of Spokane Valley has the essential elements to create a great place to bike and walk. Most streets connect, congestion is minimal, the terrain is flat, and weather is suitable many months of the year. For these reasons, biking and walking is a great way to get around the City. Where there are close links between home and destinations (such as school, work, and shops) walking and cycling can be the preferred and efficient way to move from place to place. Promoting walking and bicycling can help ease congestion, address weight and health issues and enhance the livability and economic vitality of our community. They help promote interaction between neighbors, strengthen connection to the community, provide `eyes -on- the - street' security, and support local retail activity. By comparison, streets and places where people are not present often feel uncomfortable and barren. Cities around the nation with the most positive economic growth and solid resources from tourism, general retail and other sources are places where people can come and feel comfortable. 11.0.2 Overview As an element of the City of Spokane Valley's Comprehensive Plan, this chapter is organized to present background data concerning bike and pedestrian facilities (Section 11.1), applicable federal, state and local codes relating to the topic (section 11.2), and a set of goals and objectives (section 11.3). Section 11.4, contains city -wide bike and pedestrian facility improvements, potential education, enforcement and evaluation tools. As a policy document, this chapter will guide decisions regarding multi -modal transportation facilities. As an implementation tool, it will detail priorities and standards for development. 11.0.3 Vision Statements To increase opportunities for non - motorized transportation that improve the connectivity, safety, convenience and attractiveness of the pedestrian and bicycle network in the City of Spokane Valley. To identify and prioritize facility recommendations based on thorough data collection and analysis, community visioning, regional collaboration, engineering assessment and preliminary cost estimates. 11.0.4 Process Several steps were involved in creating the Bike and Pedestrian Master Program a. Data Collection A comprehensive field inventory of existing bicycle and pedestrian facilities was conducted, identifying constraints and opportunities for improvements. The City coordinated with adjacent jurisdictions as well as bike, pedestrian and health advocates, property owners and other stakeholders. This step incorporated a thorough review of the existing adopted Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, including a review of the bike facility map, goals and policies related to bike and walking activity, as well as a review of recently approved similar Adopted 10 -25 -2011 Chapter 11 — Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 1 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan plans in the region. Accident data and funding sources for potential future projects were also gathered. A sidewalk inventory completed by students at Washington State University (WSU) was added to the City's GIS system. b. Public Outreach This Bike and Pedestrian Master Program (BPMP) was created over a year and a half period with participation from a diverse group of citizens, residents and interested parties. A contact database was created to ensure interested parties were notified throughout the development of the plan. Over 900 contacts were included within five months of initiation. The first in a series of BPMP workshops was held on June 16, 2010. A diverse group voiced opinions and concerns on bicycling and walking in the City. Through an interactive exercise, the participants identified destinations, obstacles, and preferred routes for bike and pedestrian facilities. An on -line survey was made available through the City's web page. Over 350 responses were received from the online survey, indicating a significant level of interest. The short, non - statistical survey gathered additional insight into the biking and walking experience in Spokane Valley and into desired routes and destinations. c. Connectivity Assessment and Route Recommendations From the gathered data, a preliminary connection assessment and potential route recommendations were developed. Details of existing rights -of -way, pavement width, driveway approaches and traffic counts were gathered. d. Continued Public Outreach A second community workshop was held on September 19, 2010 to present preliminary bike and pedestrian routes and connections based on the information gathered at the first workshop and through the on -line survey. The Spokane Regional Health District presented information on health impacts associated with alternative modes of transportation. By prioritizing potential projects, participants helped create a vision of a comprehensive bike and pedestrian network. The workshops were publicized online, at schools, bike shops and community facilities throughout the City. In addition, staff prepared newsletters and maintained a BPMP page on the City of Spokane Valley website. Quarterly updates were presented to the City Council as part of the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant ( EECBG) status reports. e. Safety Analysis and Prioritization of Improvements A portion of money from the City's EECBG funded an engineering consultant to review the proposed routes for safety, cost and prioritizations. This engineering assessment provides technical guidance to help ensure that proposed bike and pedestrian facilities, such as bike lanes on arterials or shared use paths in neighborhoods, are safe, functional, and appropriate for the set route. f. Plan Refinement, Review and Adoption Desired routes were refined based on technical input from the consultant. Classifications for both bicycle and pedestrian facilities were reviewed based on the American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO) guidelines and industry standards. Comprehensive Plan text, maps and exhibits were prepared. Priorities and preliminary implementation schedules were included. Additional workshops were held to gather input on the draft BPMP document. Finally, the BPMP was presented to both the Planning Commission and the City Council. 11.0.5 Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan Technical Advisory Group Developing the BPMP resulted in partnerships and collaboration between the City, adjoining jurisdictions and many other interested agencies and individuals. Representatives from many of these groups served on the Bike and Pedestrian Technical Advisory Group ( BPTAG). The BPTAG Adopted 10 -25 -2011 Chapter 11 — Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 2 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan met several times to review and make recommendations on potential routes, facilities and implementation strategies. 11.0.6 Partnerships Preparation of the BPMP has involved a wide range of people and agencies. Partnerships and collaboration contributes to the quality and integrity of the program. Maintaining these partnerships will contribute toward successful implementation and realization of shared goals. a. Spokane Regional Health District The Spokane Regional Health District (SRHD) serves as the area's public health leader and partner in protecting and improving the health of the community. The Health District's Physical Activity program works with community coalitions, elected officials, citizen groups and other organizations to encourage policies that make it easier for people to be physically active. An analysis of existing social, economic and health statistics of the residents of the City of Spokane Valley was prepared by the SRHD epidemiologist. The role of SRHD was to bring awareness of the positive health impact bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure can have on a community. b. School Districts and Safe Routes to School Safe Routes to School is a national program aimed at enabling community leaders, schools and parents across the country to improve safety and encourage more children to be active by safely walking and bicycling to school. In the process, work associated with Safe Routes to School contributes to reducing traffic congestion, improving physical health, and making communities more livable overall. The SRHD along with the City, Bicycle Alliance of Washington, Central Valley School District, East Valley School District, and West Valley School District worked diligently through the 2010/2011 school year to prepare walking audits of all elementary and middle schools. Walking audits are detailed surveys of streets and sidewalks within a one -mile radius surrounding a school using the Safe Walk and Bike Routes: A Guide for Planning and Improving Walk and Bike to School Options for Students (site: WSDOT and WTSC 2010). Results of the audits are used to prepare preferred walking routes for students and to identify and prioritize street and sidewalk safety projects. Continued coordinated efforts between school districts, SRHD and the City will aid in the successful implementation of safe routes for pedestrians of all ages. Spokane Transit Authority The Spokane Transit Authority (STA) is a regional public transportation agency providing a variety of transportation options, including bus service to the City of Spokane Valley. The transit system effectively expands the area that pedestrians are able to access for daily services and activities. STA's database of pedestrian paths throughout its service area was used as base data for the City's sidewalk inventory, gap analysis and recommended pedestrian network. The data identified barriers to people using the sidewalk network to access the bus system. d. Bicycle Alliance of Washington The Bicycle Alliance of Washington is a non - profit organization advocating for bicyclists and bike - friendly communities throughout Washington. The Alliance works toward increasing the percentage of all types of bicycle riders and increasing funding available for inclusive, non - motorized transportation facilities. The Alliance works closely with Safe Routes to School programs and serves as a clearinghouse for bicycle education and advocacy. e. Washington State University In 2007, Washington State University Interdisciplinary Design Institute (WSU) created a pedestrian model by mapping pedestrian networks throughout Spokane Transit Authority's service area, identifying barriers such as the absence of sidewalks and curb ramps, and non -ADA compliant variations in the surface condition, height, width, and slope of Adopted 10 -25 -2011 Chapter 11 — Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 3 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan pedestrian facilities. The data has been used to identify existing routes and to determine sidewalk infill priorities. By partnering with the City, data developed through the Bike and Pedestrian Master Program will be used to update the WSU pedestrian network model. In turn, the model will be useful in prioritizing pedestrian improvements in an effort to increase safety throughout the City. f. Spokane Regional Transportation Council The Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) is the local metropolitan planning organization encouraging coordination and collaboration between planning and transportation departments throughout the region. SRTC maintains the Transportation Improvement Program, a three -year list of state and federally- funded transportation projects, and the Metropolitan Transportation Plan in Spokane County, a document addressing transportation needs for the next 20 years. SRTC recognizes that walking and bicycling are simple and efficient modes of travel that can increase public transit ridership. Coordination between the City and SRTC will create opportunities to implement effective non - motorized projects and programs. 11.1 Planning Context The Bike and Pedestrian Element of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan expands on the Transportation Element to focus on non - motorized transportation. Also referred to as the Bike and Pedestrian Master Program, this element is consistent with the overall Comprehensive Plan, specifically the Land Use, Transportation, Parks and Recreation and Neighborhood Elements. 11.1.1 GMA The Washington Growth Management Act (GMA), the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) and the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) provide for the inclusion of non - motorized transportation elements in comprehensive plans. Bike and pedestrian planning is sometimes included in the land use, transportation or recreation elements. Using a separate element to address opportunities and constraints specific to these non - motorized forms of transportation allows the City of Spokane Valley to focus on improvements that enhance the livability and economic vitality of our community. 11.1.2 County -Wide Planning Policies County Wide Planning Policies (CWPP) provide a policy framework for the County and its respective cities. Specifically items 10 and 16 under Policy Topic 5 — Transportation, state: 10. Each jurisdiction should coordinate its housing and transportation strategies to support existing, or develop new, public multimodal transportation systems. 16. Each jurisdiction shall address energy consumption /conservation by: a. Designing transportation improvements for alternatives to the single- occupant vehicle; b. Locating and adopting design standards for new development to support pedestrian or non - motorized travel; c. Providing regulatory and financial incentives to promote efforts of the public and private sector to conserve energy; and d. Reducing the number of vehicle miles traveled and number of vehicle trips. As described in Section 11.0.6 above, the SRTC is the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Spokane region. SRTC maintains the Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), a 20 -year strategy to meet the transportation needs of the region. MTP goals related to non - motorized transportation include: • Establishing a bicycle and pedestrian program that will increase the mode -share of people walking and bicycling as a means of transportation over the next 20 years; • Eliminating barriers that discourage or prohibit pedestrian or bicycle access; Adopted 10 -25 -2011 Chapter 11 — Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 4 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan • Identifying the needs and gaps in the regional bicycle and pedestrian system; and Encouraging connections between residential areas and adjacent land uses to enhance awareness and cooperation between all roadway users. The MTP facilitated the creation of three complementary products: the Spokane Regional Bike Plan (adopted in 2008); the Spokane Regional Pedestrian Plan (adopted in 2009) and the SmartRoutes program. All of these were collaborative efforts with SRTC, the Spokane Regional Health District, the Active Transportation Technical Committee (including representatives from the City of Spokane Valley and other cities and towns) and a citizen -based steering committee. Each of these documents encourages jurisdictions to tailor the regional plans to their own needs and to use them for guidance to develop appropriate bicycle and pedestrian projects that traverse jurisdictional lines. 11.2 Existing Setting 11.2.1 Comprehensive Plan The City of Spokane Valley's Comprehensive Plan includes goals and policies to guide development within the City. All elements within the Comprehensive Plan must be internally consistent. Goals found within other elements encourage the development and implementation of a bike and pedestrian system within the City. The following are from the Land Use, Transportation, Natural Environment and the Parks and Recreation elements: Land Use - Goal LUG -7 Provide a balanced transportation network that accommodates public transportation, high occupancy vehicles, pedestrians, bicyclists, automobiles and integrated parking. Transportation - Goal TG -9 Enhance community livability and transportation by encouraging a connected system of pedestrian and bicycle ways that is integrated into a coordinated regional network. Natural Environment - Goal NEG -20 Support regional efforts to improve air quality. Parks and Recreation - Goal PRG -4 Based upon budgetary resources, promote, develop, operate and maintain a comprehensive trail /bicycle system within Spokane Valley that provides non - motorized travel (walking, bicycling, skating, and horseback riding) to meet city residents recreation, fitness and commuting needs. 11.2.2 Current Activity a. Collision Data The Washington State Department of Transportation maintains records of pedestrian and bicycle collision data. Between 2003 (incorporation) and 2010, there were six fatalities and 295 serious or disabling injuries in Spokane Valley associated with pedestrian and bicycle collisions. On average, there are 41 pedestrian and bicycle collisions per year. The majority of the collisions occurred on major arterials including Argonne, Pines and Sullivan Roads. It is estimated that many bicycle and pedestrian collisions have happened but have not been reported. b. Citizen Input To ensure the bike and pedestrian system reflects the community's desires, an extensive outreach component was built into the process. As described in the previous section, this process included workshops and an on -line survey. The results showed that a majority of respondents walk or bicycle for exercise /health, enjoyment, or to commute to work /school. When asked what prevents a person from biking or walking, an overwhelming 70% of the Adopted 10 -25 -2011 Chapter 11 — Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 5 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan respondents said it was due to the lack of facilities. The results showed the community's desire to see improved bike and pedestrian facilities in or around the following six routes: 1. Sprague Avenue 2. Pines Road 3. 32nd Ave / Dishman Mica 4. Argonne / Mullan corridor 5. Valleyway Avenue (as a bicycle friendly route) 6. Sullivan Road Many mentioned the need for more north /south connections to the Centennial Trail. The preferred facilities were bike lanes and shared use paths. The graphs below illustrate the respondent's views. Why do you bike or walk? Note: Respondents were asked to check all that apply 94% 89% 58% 55% 35% o- 9 /0 3% 4% Adopted 10 -25 -2011 Chapter 11 — Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 6 of 18 K C, o m o r yaa r° Aq�ca °��50 0 °Ct G° Adopted 10 -25 -2011 Chapter 11 — Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 6 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan What prevents you from biking or walking? Note: Respondents were asked to check all that apply 70% 57% 43% 28% 26% I- Fav\`` °� Qa�� Ja`� �5 26% 14% 13% 17% 6% O �a t5 Ga Where would you like to be able to bicyle or walk? Note: Responses were tallied from qualitative data 23% 5% 5% 5% 4% 21% 21% 1% GO5 �GC� GP 5r Adopted 10 -25 -2011 Chapter 11 — Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 7 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Which roadways are difficult for bicyclists or pedestrians? Note: Responses were tallied from qualitative data 24% 17% 16% 10% 5% 6% 0 t—T. 2% 3% 3% 3 /0 3% 3% 3% � ��`�a�i��t` �`��ot Q`m�� J\\`�a J�`,.��a\\�y a� yr � O� What bicycle and pedestrian facilities do you prefer? Note: Respondents were asked to check all that apply 78% 62% 51% Bike Lanes Shared Use Paths Signed, Shared Bicycle Boulevard Roadways Adopted 10 -25 -2011 Chapter 11 — Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 8 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Which of the following programs would you like to see implemented? Note: Respondents were asked to check all that apply 87% 66% 55% 47% 46% 36% 34 28% ry \0 ye ec� Qe G�5 drat° QJ�\• ear, \ °i � Q��o '� °��a i� �\a c. Health Data As part of the initial community workshops, the SRHD prepared information correlating active lifestyles, including bicycle and pedestrian commutes, to improved health. Sedentary lifestyles can contribute to obesity. Obesity can be defined as a person with a body mass index of 30 or greater. Obesity can contribute to illnesses including heart disease and strokes, high blood pressure, osteoarthritis, diabetes and some forms of cancer. Lack of physical activity increases health risks, resulting in increased costs for medical care, worker compensation and lost productivity. Obesity and lack of activity contribute to chronic diseases including cancer, heart and respiratory disease. The top five causes of death in Spokane Valley are shown below: Literature reviews have shown that urban design and land use policies creating opportunities for physical activity within communities have been effective and are considered best practices for increasing a community's health and reducing obesity. More than half of Spokane County's carbon monoxide emissions are from vehicle sources. Reducing vehicle trips by accommodating and encouraging active transportation can positively impacts health by improving air quality. SRHD also considers socio- economic factors as they relate to health. A link exists between education, poverty, and mobility choices. In Spokane Valley, between 2004 and 2008, 37.4 percent of the population had less than a high school diploma or GED. The amount of education a person achieves influences their ability to earn a certain standard of living. Between 2004 and 2008, 43.9 percent of the City's population was at or below the 200 percent federal poverty level. That is more than twice the national average. A substantial percentage of the population either cannot afford automobile transportation, or affording it is a financial hardship. For these people, in addition to the young in age and the older population, getting around by other alternatives such as walking, bicycling or transit is a necessity. Adopted 10 -25 -2011 Chapter 11 — Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 9 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 11.2.3 Existing Bicycle System Though developed as a compilation of rural townships over time, the City of Spokane Valley has a strong grid pattern of streets. The placement of principal and minor arterials, collectors and local access streets overlaid on the relatively flat topography provides an excellent base for non - motorized transportation. a. Types of Bicycle Users There are many types of bicyclists with varying skills and levels of comfort in terms of riding in traffic. While bicyclists can be loosely categorized as experienced adult, casual adult and child cyclists, there are many levels of cycling competency and just as many opinions as to what makes an ideal bike route. Some experienced cyclists ride on busy arterial streets regardless of bicycle facilities. Some cyclists will ride on busy roads only if bike lanes are provided. Some will use the lanes only if parallel residential roads are unavailable. b. Existing Bicycle Facilities A combination of striped bike lanes, posted bicycle friendly routes and separated bike facilities are found throughout the City. In addition, other streets act as informal routes, favored by bicycle commuters as safe and convenient alternatives to bike ways with heavy automobile traffic. The following different types of bicycle facilities, as defined by the American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials ( AASHTO) are found throughout Spokane Valley: i. Shared Use Path: Facilities on separated right -of -way and with minimal cross flow by motor vehicles. Minimum width is six feet; optimal width is ten feet. Shared use paths may also be used by pedestrians, skaters, wheelchair users, joggers and other non - motorized users. • The Centennial Trail is an example of a shared use path in the City. With connections through adjacent jurisdictions, it is an important regional recreational and commuting facility. Other shared use paths exist along the south side of Appleway Avenue from Sprague Avenue to the eastern City boundary and on Sullivan Road, from Centennial Trail to just south of Trent Road. Bike Lanes: A portion of a roadway designated by striping, signing and pavement markings for the preferential or exclusive use by bicyclists. The required width of a bike lane on a given street varies based on several factors, such as existence of a gutter and curb. Parking and traffic volume must be considered as well. AASHTO and SRTC (Spokane Regional Transportation Council) guidelines recommend that for a street without gutter or curb, the minimum width of the bike lane should be four feet. If the street includes curb and gutter, the minimum width should be five feet. In situations where parking is permitted without any striping or stalls, AASHTO guidelines recommend an 11 -foot bike lane width. Bicycle lanes improve conditions for cyclists of all abilities within a given corridor and encourage increased bicycle use by providing a greater degree of comfort and perceived safety for less skilled cyclists. • Striped bicycle lanes are located along several arterials, including 32nd Avenue, portions of Broadway, Evergreen Road, Mission Road, Sprague Avenue and 16tH Avenue. Mirabeau Parkway from Pines Road to Indiana Avenue and Indiana Avenue from Mirabeau to Evergreen Road are also improved with bike lanes. iii. Signed Shared Roadway: Signed lane allowing both vehicular and bicycle traffic. Minimum width is 14 feet. Signed shared roadways indicate to cyclists that there are particular advantages to using these routes compared to alternate routes. • In the City of Spokane Valley, signed shared roadways exist on 4th Avenue from University to Conklin, and on Trent from Flora to the eastern city boundary. Adopted 10 -25 -2011 Chapter 11 — Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 10 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan iv. Shared Roadway: Lane allowing both vehicular and bicycle traffic. No signing is involved. • All public streets in the City of Spokane Valley can be defined as shared roadways. Existing bike facilities in the City of Spokane Valley are shown in Map 11.1. Other bicycle facilities found throughout the City include bicycle parking facilities at some commercial, public and office facilities and bicycle racks on transit vehicles. c. System Deficiencies Barriers surrounding both recreation and commuting bicycle activity throughout the City include crossing Interstate 90, railroad tracks, and the Spokane River. Currently, principal arterials cross these barriers. However, the limited space for bike facilities on these arterials plus the traffic volume hinders the safety and comfort for many riders. This impacts those trying to access commercial and employment centers in the north part of the City as well as those trying to access the Centennial Trail. Other factors impacting bicycle activity include impaired sight distances, limited street connectivity, cyclist and motorist behaviors, lack of way- finding signs, and maintenance issues. 11.2.4 Existing Pedestrian System a. Types of Pedestrians For trips of a certain length, walking is a simple affordable way to get around. Spokane Valley, with relatively flat terrain and a predominately grid street pattern, has great opportunities for pedestrians of all kinds. People choose to walk for many reasons including recreation and necessity. Pedestrians include adults, children, seniors, people without cars and people with disabilities. Those with higher levels of transportation choice, i.e. those specifically able to afford cars and of driving age, make use of autos for most trips. This situation is not so much a reflection of popular transportation preferences but of the many auto - dominated land use and transportation decisions that created present day Spokane Valley. Citizens, including those driving cars as well as seniors, youth and people with disabilities, need safety, connectivity and accessibility. b. Existing Pedestrian Facilities Sidewalk inventories were performed by City staff as part of the analyses conducted for the Bike and Pedestrian Master Program and the American with Disabilities Act transition plan. Also, in association with the Safe Routes to School program, volunteers from all elementary and middle schools in the City conducted walking audits to determine potential routes to their schools and to identify missing sidewalk segments, potential pedestrian conflicts and existing safe haven areas for students. The existing pedestrian system in Spokane Valley includes sidewalks, shared use paths, wide shoulders on rural roads and residential streets. Generally, sidewalks exist on most of the existing arterials and range in width from three to six feet. In addition, most streets surrounding elementary, middle and high school facilities are improved with sidewalks. Several shared -use paths, intended for all types of non - motorized transportation, are located throughout the City (see section on existing bicycle facilities above). Map 11.3 shows locations of existing sidewalk facilities. Other infrastructure associated with pedestrian activity includes curb ramps, intersection markings, cross walks with and without associated signals, benches and shelters for transit facilities, and street trees. c. System Deficiencies: For the most part, sidewalks on arterials are constructed adjacent to the curb and lanes where cars are traveling in excess of 30 and 40 miles per hour, impacting pedestrian comfort and safety. In addition, while current development standards require separated sidewalks, there are portions where sidewalks were not built with initial street construction. Adopted 10 -25 -2011 Chapter 11 — Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 11 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Other factors making walking difficult include crosswalk issues on high - volume streets, obstructions such as power poles and utility boxes in the sidewalk, outdated or non - existent curb ramps, poor lighting, limited facilities at transit stops, and maintenance issues. 11.3 Goals and Policies Spokane Valley is intended to become a bicycle and pedestrian friendly City, where bicycling and walking are encouraged and promoted as safe and convenient forms of transportation and recreation. Goals help guide actions towards fulfilling this vision. Policies are more specific statements relating to implementing measures that will achieve the goals. As with many cities, Spokane Valley has limited funds with which to pursue its bike and pedestrian goals. Focused and prioritized resources will aid the City in having a positive impact on non - motorized transportation infrastructure. The City will strive to make strategic investments of the limited resources available and where possible, leverage resources in cooperation with other governmental and private agencies. The following goals and policies are consistent with the goals and policies of other chapters of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, with the Countywide Planning Policies and the Growth Management Act. Network and Facilities Goal & Policies Goal BP -1 Provide a comprehensive bikeway and pedestrian system connecting residential neighborhoods with parks, schools, commercial areas, trails, and employment areas within the City and to adjacent jurisdictions. Policies BP -1.1 Encourage bike lanes, shared use paths and sidewalks throughout the City where applicable and appropriate. BP -1.2 Encourage bicycle parking facilities at commercial and public facilities as well as at places of employment. BP -1.3 Work with Spokane Transit Authority to develop safe, comfortable and secure pedestrian amenities and bicycle parking facilities at transit stops as well as bike racks on transit vehicles. BP -1.4 Encourage sidewalks, bicycle facilities and shared use paths as part of development where applicable. BP -1.5 Encourage landscaping, bollards and other treatments with new streets, parking lots and other pedestrian activity zones to create an effective safety and visual buffer between the sidewalk and the street. BP -1.6 Coordinate on regional non - motorized efforts in partnership with adjoining jurisdictions and with the Spokane Regional Transportation Council. BP -1.7 Pursue joint funding applications for implementation that will expand the regional bikeway and pedestrian network. BP -1.8 Strive to maintain access for pedestrians, bicycles and emergency response vehicles when a street closure or a vacation request is processed. BP -1.9 Encourage the use of technological advances to provide a safe, user friendly bicycle and pedestrian network. BP -1.10 When considering alternative modes of transportation, priority should be placed on providing sidewalks for children particularly in areas near parks and schools. Adopted 10 -25 -2011 Chapter 11 — Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 12 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Safety and Accessibility Goal and Policies Goal BP -2 Reduce the number of bicycle and pedestrian injuries through development of safe and accessible routes for bicyclists and pedestrians of all ages and abilities. Policies BP -2.1 Encourage bicycle and pedestrian facilities to meet nationally recognized design standards for safety and accessibility, such as AASHTO. BP -2.2 Encourage bicycle routes and shared use paths to be properly signed and marked to address personal safety. BP -2.3 Encourage safe bicycle and pedestrian crossings of major arterials, railroads, I- 90 and the Spokane River through use of innovative treatments where appropriate. BP -2.4 Encourage the enforcement of pedestrian and bicycle safety rules on City streets and bikeways. Promotion and Education Goal and Policies Goal BP -3 Implement comprehensive education and encouragement programs targeted at all populations in the City. Policies BP -3.1 Continue coordinating with existing agencies and programs, including the Spokane Regional Health District, the Safe Routes to Schools program, the Police Department, SCOPE, the Commute Trip Reduction program and other entities concerned with bicycle and pedestrian safety, to create education programs focused on safe bicycle riding, walking and motorist activity. BP -3.2 Provide current and easily accessible information about the bicycle and pedestrian networks, programs and facilities. Implementation, Funding and Maintenance Goal and Policies Goal BP- 4 Seek funding from all available sources to implement and maintain bicycle and pedestrian facilities as well as ongoing education and enforcement. Policies BP -4.1 Maintain a prioritized and phased implementation plan that takes into consideration the scope, cost and benefits of a facility, and available funding opportunities. BP -4.2 Where feasible, include facilities as described in this Bike and Pedestrian Element as part of the annual Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). BP -4.3 Review and monitor opportunities for multi -modal grant funding as they become available. BP -4.4 City should strive to maintain quality street surfaces that provide a safe environment for vehicles and cyclists. BP -4.5 Ensure internal coordination between departments prior to developing street projects that include bike and /or pedestrian facilities. Adopted 10 -25 -2011 Chapter 11 — Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 13 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan BP -4.6 Use Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding to facilitate the construction of safer pedestrian routes serving low and moderate income neighborhoods throughout the City of Spokane Valley. BP -4.7 Direct the use of the CDBG funds for the benefit of citizens in low and moderate income neighborhoods to develop pedestrian connections that would provide public transit access to critical services for these citizens and pedestrian routes that enable children to safely walk to school in these neighborhoods. 11.4 Bike and Pedestrian Master Program 11.4.1 Engineering Improvements a. Overall Bicycle and Pedestrian Network The City of Spokane Valley Bike and Pedestrian Master Program is based on field data, citizen input and engineering analysis of constraints and opportunities for bicycle and pedestrian facilities. It should be noted that this is a master program, not a detailed feasibility analysis. As such, exact routing and designations could be modified during the course of more detailed studies of specific projects. The recommended bikeway network is shown in Map 11.2 and recommended pedestrian network is shown in Map 11.4. Map 11.5 shows the recommended travel ways for the schools that participated in the safe routes to school exercise. b. Possible Engineering Solutions The specific types of bike and pedestrian treatments that are applied to roads vary depending on the existing right -of -way, traffic counts, traffic speeds, roadway cross sections, number of approaches or driveways on the street and topography. A brief description of bicycle treatments is provided below. More specific design guidelines including the complete toolbox and typical cross section layouts are found in Appendix 2: Facility Design Guidelines. Bicycle Friendly Routes — Bicycle friendly routes are roadways with low speeds and low volumes. The treatments recommended for bicycle routes should strive to improve through movements for bicyclists and other non - motorized modes. Bicycle route treatments are ideal on two -lane roadways where traffic volume is less than 3,000 vehicles per day (although less than 1,500 vehicles per day is preferred) and posted speeds of 25 miles per hour or less. See Appendix 2 for specific bicycle friendly route treatments and cross sections. Bicycle Lanes - Bicycle lanes designate an exclusive part of the roadway (typically on the right side of the roadway) to be used by bicyclists only. A bike lane is typically located between the right most traffic lane and the curb or on street parking area. A bicycle lane should be considered on roadways with traffic volumes greater than 3,000 vehicles per day or posted speeds greater than 25 miles per hour. Appendix 2 includes a variety of bicycle lane treatments from a standard bike lane to buffered bike lanes and climbing lanes. The appendix also includes cross sections showing how bike lanes could be applied to existing City roadways. iii. Cycle Tracks - A cycle track is an exclusive bike facility separated from vehicle traffic and the sidewalk, and is intended to provide improved comfort and safety for the bicyclist as compared to an on- street bike lane. The cycle track can be separated from vehicle traffic using a variety of treatments (curbs, planter strips, on- street parking, pavement markings, or other options). In addition, the cycle track should be clearly defined from sidewalks (grade separated, pavement markings, or an alternate clear indication) to prevent bicycle conflicts with pedestrians. A cycle track requires a wider cross section than a typical bike lane, but should be considered on roadways where bicyclists may not feel comfortable biking directly adjacent to vehicle traffic. Adopted 10 -25 -2011 Chapter 11 — Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 14 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan iv. Shared Use Paths — Shared use paths are physically separated from the roadway and are intended for use by pedestrians, bicyclists, runners and other non - motorized users. Shared use paths supplement bike lanes, bicycle friendly routes and sidewalks and connect to these other facilities at ends of the path as well as midway, depending on the length and location. The number of driveways and crossings should be minimized when designing a shared use path. Generally, if there are more than eight crossings per mile, an on- street facility should be considered instead. v. Bicycle Intersection Treatments - Intersection treatments improve the safety of bicyclists through an intersection (typically a signalized intersection). Depending on the characteristics of the cross streets (traffic and bicycle volumes, traffic and bicycle speeds, type of bicycle facility, number of vehicles and /or bikes turning, visibility, surrounding land use, and other factors) a range of treatments may be applicable. Appendix 2 provides specific intersection treatment guidelines and criteria. vi. Mid -Block Crossing Treatments - Mid -block crossings can be dangerous for bicyclists because drivers are not typically expecting a crossing at a non - intersection location. The need for a mid -block crossing may arise if two bicycle facilities are off -set or if a trail intersects a roadway at mid - block. In these situations, mid -block crossing treatments can be applied to improve the safety. vii. Wayfinding - Wayfinding is meant to be used by bicyclists while en route to communicate directions, distance and sometimes expected travel time to a particular destination. Wayfinding is typically accomplished through the use of signs supplemented at times with pavement markings. Wayfinding can be beneficial to all types of bicycle facilities. viii. Prioritization Criteria — Bicycle Network The overall bicycle and pedestrian networks will be implemented over time. The criteria contained in Appendix 1 has been used to determine where to focus available funding and staff time to implement bicycle facility projects. Priority is given to those projects anticipated to serve the most number of people and to contribute to overall safety. ix. Prioritization Criteria — Pedestrian Network The criteria contained in Appendix 1 was used to determine where to focus available funding and staff time to implement pedestrian facility projects. Priority is given to those projects anticipated to serve the most number of people and to contribute to overall safety. x. Network Improvements Facility improvements, summarized in Appendix 1, are categorized as short -term and long -term projects based on need and ease of implementation. 11.4.2 Ancillary Facilities Ancillary facilities add to the safety and comfort of using walking and bicycling as modes of transportation. Ancillary facilities can include bicycle parking, showers and lockers, transit features and bicycle and pedestrian maps. Crosswalk design can aid in increasing visibility through the use of specific striping patterns and lights. The following methods address ancillary features: a. Pedestrian Features: Encourage that pedestrian crossing facilities, including crosswalks and signage, alert both motorists and pedestrians to the presence of the facility. Work with developers and utilities to remove existing hazards such as light poles and utility boxes from the sidewalk. Where appropriate, constrain roadway width Adopted 10 -25 -2011 Chapter 11 — Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 15 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan with bulb -outs and tighter right turns at intersections to slow vehicles as they approach areas with high pedestrian volumes. Provide sidewalks or pedestrian paths between neighborhoods and commercial or public destinations where appropriate. Encourage clearly identified safe walking paths between public sidewalks and commercial buildings. b. Bicycle Parking: Continue to require bicycle racks for new development. Consider developing standards for the size of bicycle parking spaces, clearance, aisles, signs, anchoring, non - interference with pedestrian circulation, and weather protection. c. Shower and Locker Facilities: Continue to coordinate with Spokane County Commute Trip Reduction program to encourage shower and locker facilities as tenant benefits and to encourage employers to consider partnering with nearby gym facilities for use of existing shower facilities. d. Transit Features: Continue as an active partner with the Spokane Regional Transportation Council and the Spokane Transit Authority to encourage the accommodation of bike lockers and bikes on transit vehicles. 11.4.3 Education and Encouragement Unfortunately, too many bicyclists in the United States lack the basic skills or knowledge to safely ride a bicycle in traffic. Many people are afraid of bicycling on streets. Bicycle education programs are designed to increase bicycle safety by improving the ability to ride with traffic as well as improve motorist awareness. The difficulties faced in helping people develop this skill and knowledge stems from the wide range of age groups that require this training and the necessity to tailor the programs to each group. Bicycle education programs should be directed at children bicyclists, adult bicyclists and motorists. The following methods address education and encouragement: Child Education and Encouragement: In conjunction with the Health District, school districts and other interested organizations, encourage development of bicycle education programs for several age groups or use existing programs that have demonstrated effectiveness. Programs could be incorporated into existing summer parks programming and existing school programming. Programs could include bicycle helmet safety information, maintenance and repair, safe riding habits and bicycle rides. More specifically, students in grades K -3 could be taught basic pedestrian skills, stranger danger, crossing residential streets, using pedestrian push buttons and taking a school bus. Older students in Grades 4 to 5 could learn bike safety and handling skills, including bike operation on streets with supervised bike rides on neighborhood streets. Later, in Grades 7 -9, students could learn basic mobility skills of how to get around town including using transit for utilitarian and recreational trips (e.g., how to read a bus schedule, execute a transfer, take rapid transit), and more on safe bicycling practices. In tenth grade, many students take driver's education. The driver's education curriculum could include focused instruction on how motorists should interact with pedestrians and bicyclists, how to predict their movements, pass safely and learn when different modes have the right -of -way. Adult Education and Encouragement: Continue to partner with the Health District, Police Department, SCOPE and other interested organizations to develop adult pedestrian and bicycle program(s) which could include a public awareness campaign focused on responsible road behavior. The campaign could be directed to pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists alike and make use of public service space from newspapers, television, radio, bus advertising, posters and flyers included in utility bills. In addition, promote community events such as Bike to Work Week, charity bike rides, costume rides, bike fairs and bicycle rodeos. Include bicycle safety checks and safety information. Incorporate "share the road" signs where appropriate on City streets and include "sharing the road" or other safety campaign information on the City's webpage. Adopted 10 -25 -2011 Chapter 11 — Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 16 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 11.4.4 Enforcement While laws that address bicyclists' behavior and safety are in place, they are sometimes not fully enforced. Effective enforcement leads to a safer environment for pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists alike. The following methods address enforcement of this Bike and Pedestrian Master Program: a. Law Enforcement: Work with the Spokane Valley Police Department to develop a policy to include the City's intent to enforce existing laws affecting pedestrian, bicyclist and motorist responsibilities, including parking in bike lanes but especially those relating to drunken driving, careless driving, speeding and failing to yield. b. School Crossings: Continue assisting school districts to develop their Safe Routes to School programs to ensure safe crossing activity at school sites. Engage SCOPE as an additional presence where needed. c. Facility Upkeep: Continue existing program of regular maintenance of street and sidewalk facilities. Ensure that asphalt pavement overlays are flush with the concrete gutter and that utility covers are flush with the pavement. 11.4.5 Implementation and Funding Various portions of this Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Program can be implemented with existing procedures (such as paint applied when a road is resurfaced, continuing existing requirements and coordination with other agencies). Other portions will require further study, possible neighborhood input and detailed engineering design. Table 11.4.1 summarizes potential steps involved with implementation: Table 11.4.1 BPMP Implementation Summary Program or Possible Implementation Step(s) Lead Department Improvement Bicycle and Pedestrian Network Improvements Ancillary Facilities Education and Encouragement Programs Enforcement Programs Further studies to determine exact facility improvements to be implemented Neighborhood input Engineering design work Funding source identification Environmental review Application of requirements with development Coordination with other agencies Program research and development Coordination with other agencies in developing programs Funding Source identification Community Development; Public Works Community Development Public Works Community Development; Public Works Community Development; Public Works Community Development; Project Developers Community Development Community Development; Parks Department Community Development Community Development; Public Works As referenced in Table 11.4.1, funding would be required to implement many portions of the Bike and Pedestrian Master Program. Adopted 10 -25 -2011 Chapter 11 — Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 17 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Detailed descriptions of funding sources, including match requirements and application timing, are contained in Appendix 3. Review of several funding programs reveals that while each grant announcement details specific criteria for funding, certain common threads are present. When applying for funding consider the following criteria: a. Partnership Funding is limited. Therefore, grant sources encourage and support cooperative regional projects and planning efforts that integrate housing, transportation, environmental impact and economic development. Projects that pull together public and private entities and multiple stakeholders are favored. b. Risk Reduction Crash data quantifies dangerous stretches of pedestrian and bicycle commute routes. Increasing safety for pedestrians and bicyclists encourages the larger community to consider these alternative modes of transportation. Projects designed to address a clear and demonstrated safety hazard are therefore encouraged. c. Location Bike and pedestrian facilities that link residential areas with schools, recreation facilities, and shopping areas result in a large benefit to a community. Encouraging alternative transportation to daily activities reduces car commutes and pollution. Well located projects also consider and provide for multi - generational users. d. Broad Project Scope Developing and encouraging use of an overall bike and pedestrian system is an on -going process. Implementing a successful bike and pedestrian master program includes identification of facility improvements, provisions for education, encouragement and enforcement, and program follow -up that provides for evaluation and adjustments over time. 11.4.6 Monitoring and Modifications Monitoring the effectiveness of the overall BPMP can be accomplished as part of the annual Comprehensive Plan review and update. Modifications to the Bicycle Map, the Pedestrian Map, the project implementation tables and other programs described in this Chapter can be accomplished as needed to achieve established goals. The City's web page can be updated with notices of projects that are in the planning, design, build or maintenance phase. Education and enforcement activities can be highlighted on the web page. Adopted 10 -25 -2011 Chapter 11 — Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 18 of 18 ICity of Spokane hard Ad,eH -f'�� -- Park I��ra Fa�ry w _ °ra a Mirabeau Park ,� da nn roan da �a�g mCarlsl on 90 ey Add bike lanes, improve sidewalk, and U N— L/� ` enhance crosswalk a safety on Broadway from Park to Pines Add bike lanes on e sha _ University from v,r• 4 nt amm n Sprague to Mission - Park Road ca \P o0 1 i t ■� Add bike lanes ' m� aw - x"' on Faucher fror a° Sprague to Bra ay r fiBalfour Opportunity Township sg,agaaurr♦ tti s- _ Park naa�n - Hall Add bike lanes, a improve sidewalk, and a and • enhance crosswalk °t" F elh - sm safety on Broadway by ti~' 1 s h st • Add bike from Park to Pines - lanes from Rh Edgecliff t LL t 4th [0 18th k w mt Park Stripe buffered bike �19h Zane on Appleway L— rh g �� from Dishman -Mica - gh ° th to University r� 1 n" a tam - � tam m Terrace it 5 ,� oa a nre Add bike lanes 2 zsm a 28t on Pinesfrom a s° 27th , 24th to 32nd Browns annn am Widening of the Park 2 t s n_ atat existing bike $ 7, 22nd lane /shoulder �� Ca`eHe from 16th to 32nd Park r et 7th 40t" 4rh Construct bike lanes and sidewalk on Ma Indiana extension Sullivan from Sullivan to Flora Park 4 KT I -I--a eyw m Add bike lanes on LbEvergreen from 16th to 32nd and complete sidewalk gaps from 24th to 32nd oo Map 11.2 Recommended �randa Wellesley Bikeway Network = E Legend Bicycle System Existing Bike Lane a d Existing Shared Use Path cra Bs— a� ..... Proposed Bike Friendly Route ..... Proposed Bike Lane ° i a F .... •Proposed Shared Use Path City of Ped/Bike Bridge Liber ..... proposed Ped/Bike Bridge Lake OPotential Crossing Treatments s ra • • • • • Centennial Trail Trailheads �smw c3 r Schools w+«+++ Railroad Other Municipalities City of Spokane Vall ey A Parks L * Water Bodies Map Location Ordinance eNo.: 110014 Ordinance No.: 11 -014 6 p S0O3kaR@�` . Vd11ey 0 0.5 1 2 Miles I i i I I Nofice: Die information shown on this map is compiled from various es and is subject to constant revision. The City makes no clmms or guarantees about the accuracy or currency ofthis map and expressly disclaims liability for errors and omissions in its contents. To co *m accuracy contact the City of Spokane Valley, Community Development Department, Division ofplmsning, (509) 921 -1000. Pmdascor ma City Sposaw —Ity, co.n.na iyuavamp— tituap —tnc City of hSpokane �O hard Ave a Park Sidewalk additions to y y, Montgomery Ave 2012 Sidewalk additions ' ' Edgeclift` to Park Rd 2012 nm Park_ _ - th 14th „ m epay Sidewalk additions 7 ^ _ 1nm 1 — [o Pines Rd 2012 NNLrabeau Park JTr Sidewalk additions - to Evergreen Rd 2012 m tae Sidewalk ° £ additions to e 24th Ave 2012 ism m Map 11.4 Recommended Pedestrian Network Map Location Effective Date: 11/-01 Ordinance No 11 -014 6 p I 0 1 2 Miles I I =e: the information shown on this map is compiled from various es and is subject to constant revision. The City makes no claims or guarantees about the accuracy or currency ofthis map and expressly disclaims liability for errors and omissions in its contents. To co �m accuracy contact the City of Spokane Valley, Community Development Department, Division ofPlasning, (509) 921 -1000. Pmd., rmeciy °rsp °saneVal @y,c °.n.nn iy oevemp.nencoepamnenc qLegend Pedestrian Network - Sidewalks Proposed Sidewalks 2012 Sidewalk Additions • Existing Shared Use Path ° ery ..... Proposed Shared Use Path i I d,a 1B� is PedBike Bridge q City of .... Proposed PedBike Bridge Centennial Trail ta!e— -- Liberty - Des Lake Trailheads oO0 "' Schools Railroad o- ° Other Municipalities City of Spokane Valley ° 3,d 2,d 4 _ etn c3 Parks Water Bodies Map Location Effective Date: 11/-01 Ordinance No 11 -014 6 p I 0 1 2 Miles I I =e: the information shown on this map is compiled from various es and is subject to constant revision. The City makes no claims or guarantees about the accuracy or currency ofthis map and expressly disclaims liability for errors and omissions in its contents. To co �m accuracy contact the City of Spokane Valley, Community Development Department, Division ofPlasning, (509) 921 -1000. Pmd., rmeciy °rsp °saneVal @y,c °.n.nn iy oevemp.nencoepamnenc FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING CO1VI:NIISSION NXay % 2413 A. Background: 1. The Spokane Valley Comprehensive Platt (Comprehensive Plan) includes an annual amendment oyale that runs from November 2nd to November 1st of the following year, The Planning Cunmissifln considers applications received prior to November I" in late winterfearly spring of the foltowiagyear, with a decision by City Cour-Lull is late spring/carly summer. 2. For the 2013 Comprehensive Plan annual amendment cycle, the Commuriity Development Department received two privately initiated requests fur salt- specific Comps)eltensive Plan amsndmea #s, designated as CPA- 41-013 and CIA -02 -013. In addition, ilie City initiated one site- spcciflc Comprehensive Plan amendment, designated as CPA. -03 -013. Sites appruved for a Comprehensive Plan amendment will receive a zoning classification consistent Nvith the new land use designation. The City initiated Comprehensive Plan text amendments to six Comprehensive Plan Elements. Ghaptrr 2 - Lend Use, Chapter 3 - Transportation, Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities and Public Services, Chapter 7 - Ewnomic Development, Chapter 14 - Neighborhoods, and Chapter 11 -Bike and Pedestrian. ne Comprehensive Plan lext amendments are designated as CPA -05 -013 through CPA -10 -413. B. Findings: L Spolcane Valley Municipal Code (SVMCj 17.50.140 provides the framework for the public to participate throughout ilia Comprehensive Plan arnendtnent process, including notice and public lreaiing requirements. 2. On April 79, 2013, notice for the proposed amendments was placed in the Spokane Valley News Herald and each site subject to a site- specific amendment was pasted with a "Notice of Public Bearing" sign, with a description of the proposal. 3. Individual notice of the site - specific map amendment proposals were mailed W alt property owners within 400 feet of eauIr affected site, 4. On May 10, 20135 the Depattraent of Commerce was provided a notice of intent to adopt amendments tc the Comprehensive Plan. S. Pursuant to the State EnviroiurwIJ Policy Act set forth in RC 43.210 (SBPA), environmental checklists were required fat` each proposed Comprehensive »J an map and text amendment, b. Staff reviewed tba envirw rnental checklists and a threshold determination vas made for each Comprehensive Plan amendment. Optional Deten- ninations of Non- Significance (DNS) were issued for each of the requested Comprehensive Plan amendments on April 19, 2013. 7, The DNS's were published in the City's official newspaper an April 19, 2013, consistent with Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC), Title 21, Environmental Controls. 8 The Pluuning Cummissivn finds the procedural requirements cf SEPA and SVMC Title 21 have been fulfilled. Findings and Recommend�tiorns of the Spokane Valley Planning Cnmm[ssiarn far 2013 CPAs Page. of 2 9. The Planning Corn nis.sion reviewed the proposed uiirnendments concurrently to eualuate the cumulative impacts. The mvicw was consistent with the annueI amendment pracess outlined in Spokane Valley Municipal. Code (SVEMC) 17.90.140 and RCW 36.70A (GrOW111 Management Act), 10. Thu Planning Commission held a public hearing on each of the Comprehensive Plan amvndment!� on May 9, 2013. After receiving public testimony, the Planning Commission deliberated and voted to forward CPA- 01 -13, CPA- 02 -13, CPA- 03 -13, CPA- 05 -13, CPA- 06 -13, CPA-07-13, CPA- 08-13, CPA- 09 -13, and CPA -10 -13 to City Council with a recontunendation for approval, 11, prim- to voting CPA -a9 -13 forward for City Council consideration, the )planning CDin- nission approved modifications to CPA -09 -13 12. The planning Commission hereby adapts and incorporates by reference all findings of staff for CPA -01 -013 through CPA•O3 -013 and CPA -05 -013 tlwQugh CPA -10 -013, as attached. 33. The Planning Commission finds the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive plan are censistent with Grwmh Management Act and do not result in internal inconsistencies %Yithin the plant itself: 14. The, Planning Commission finds the site - specific map amendments will provide suitable land use designations ocnsistent with the City Is Comprehensive Plan. Conclusions: The Planning Commissi4Z i finds compliance with SVMC 17.0.140(14) — Comprehensive Plan Amendment Approval Caitcria. The proposed 2013 Comprehensive Plan amendments are consistent with the goals and policies cf the Spokane Valley Cnmprehernsivr, Plan, and will promote the public health, safer, welfare, and protection of Vic environment. Recommendations: The Spokane Valley Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve 'he proposed 2013 Coutprehensive Plant amendments as attached.. ApprovO is 23" day oi. a 2 13 Sill rtes, Chailtnan ATTFS'r Cari Rinshaw, Planning Commission Secretary Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Piat nIng Commission For 2013 CPAs Page 2 oft Spokane Valley Planning Cnrarujssion APPROVED Minutes Council Chambers — City Hall, 11707 E. Sprague Ave, May 9, 2013 I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Bates called the meeting to order at 6:0 p.m. 11. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissionm.. staff, and audience stood fbr the pledge of allegiance 111. ROLL CALL C[lMMISSIONERS Present Absent CITY STAFF Bill Bates - Chair W r Scott Kuhta, Planning Manager Joe Stay - Vice Chair 9 r Mike, Basinger, Senior Ptarner Steven Neill W r Fnk Lamb, Deputy City Attorney Kevin Anderson W r Mike Phillips I` Robert mccaslin Christiana Carlson r Cirri 1linshaw, secretary IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Commissioner Sloy n7ade a mwian to wrove the agenda as plvsented, seconded and this molion wcespassedunanimovdy, V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Neill node a motion to approve the April 25, 2013 minutes as presented, seconded and rhis nzolion -w aspassed unri imourly. VI. PUBLIC COMMENT Thera was no public comment. VIZ. COMMISSION REPORTS There was no public comment_ VIII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS Planning Manager Scott Kuhta reported that there would be two upcoming community meetings. On May 201" at 6:00 PM at the Spokane Valley Library 12004 E. Main, diere is an Planning Commission Minutes Pap l of open house or the park and library conceptual plan for the property adjacent to Balfour Park, On May 22 "d at 4:04 PM, there is a follow up meeting oli the Appleway Trail planning process. The trail planning is from University to Evergreen for the Appleway section for a multi -use palh . IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS The Public Hearing opened at 6.08 PM A. New Business: Senior Planner Mike Basinger provided an overview of the arnendmevs for the 2013 Cornpreliensive Plan. Public Comment: CPA- O1 - -13 1. Linda Stack, 14106 E. Springfield, Spokane Walley: Ms. Stack had concerns on the building height. Planning Manager Kuhta stated that the maximum building height for that zone is 45ft. Nis. Stack stated she would not Iike it if there were apatlrments looking in har yard. Mr. Kuhta clarified that thc property that is to the east will remain in the low density residential category, which is single - family zoning. 2. Linda Lafser, 14414 E. Alki, Spokane Malley: Ms. Lafser had concerns about where. the business and parking were going to be located and if they plan is to extend the road Senior Planner Basinger respondeci that access to that development would carne off EverWeeri. Future developmemt of the back parcel may be accessed from Alki, but will be in the low- density residential category. 3. Applicant Gene Arger with Arger Company, 304 N. Mullen, Spokane Malley: Provided an overview of developments in the valley including one on Evergreen, Mr. Arger stated that they are looking to add same consistency by moving the zoning line to the east to lime up with the property to the south. He stated what makes this different from the property to the south is it is next to a community cornmereial zone to the north which makes it a good candidate for garden office. CPA -02 -13 1. Applicant Todd Whipple, 2528 N. Sullivan Rd., Spokane Valiey: Mr, Whipple provided the plan for CP,A- 02 -13. I-1c stated that changing this from low density residential to high density residential would have little impact to the overall neighborhood, givers the fact that the City has standards and requirements in the code that will guide them in the process. 2. Jay Shuman, 18414 E. Sinto, Spokane Valley: Mr. Shuman believes there is a lot of impact in regards to this change. He stated that the view to Holiday Bills is blocked wi th apartments from when he lives and the view to h4ica Peale will be blocked if more apartments are put in, Mr. Shuman also stated tote traffic flow and congestion is going to change. 3. Ben Thompson, 18511 E. Sharp, Spokane Malley: Wanted to know where the access is going to be to the apartments. Planning Manager Kuhla stated that it is not determined Pianning Carninission Minutes page 2 of yet. Mr. Thompson stated that he lives on Sharp and its tough living there already due to heavy traffic, no more scenic view, 4. Talena Thompson, 18511 E. Sharp, Spokane Valley: Nis. Thompson stated that the people that live in the apartments already throw cigarette butts and garbage over the fence line. People are inconsiderate. She said as a homeowner she takes good card of her property and would like this to stay how it is. . Dennis Crapo, Diamond Ruck CungLrucdon, and subject property owner, 2602 N. Sullivan, Spokane Valley: Mr. Crapo expressed some insight on the application. From Barker to Boone there is a short distance that is accessed by the residents of the apailimnts. He stated that the residents to the apartments generally pass endy's and then they drive into the parking lot. Mr. Crapo stated that lie has never had any calls fi-om the neighborhood reflecting any issuos with trash or cigarette butts. Commissioner Carlsen asked if there is trouble - finding parking. Mr. Crapo resporsded that they had done a traffic .study and that in addition the existing apartments have adequate parking, which was required to be able to build the apartments. Commissioner Carlsen asked Mr. Crapo if he had plans for a specific building where he is proposing his change and what could fit there. Air. Crapo stated that they would have to look at the zoning. He said eighteen units would fit there_ Senior Planner Basinger explained what was bcfvre therm was the change to MF -2 and then is a variety of uses that are allowed with an F -2. Mr, Basinger discussed that the Plarming Commission needs to look at it to we if it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan And regulations, and make stare the regulations protect the neighborhood character. He stated that there is a relational set back that was adopted; it transitions the height to any adjacent single - family use or zone. The two single - family uses to the west would require the relational setback for any development on this property. 6. Jay Shaman, 18414 E. Sinto, Spokane Valley: Mr. Shuman discussed that due to all the growth, during rush hour traffic Barker and Boone are being backed tip. It is causing traffic to go tip to Sharp and Sinto and yipping thru those neighborhoods to get back to Boone to get back into the apartments. Commissioner McC&slin commended the public For coming in early on the process before it goes to Council. Ile also recommended that if they have corn plaints about the neighboring property or traffic problems they treed to file those complaints as soon as possible Ttiat would help their case. C~ommissioncr Neill asked what it would take to have a light installed. Mr. Basinger stated that this is a non- project action. At the time of development, the applicant would have to meet transportation concumency. City's traffic engineer would require a traffic study and if there are concerns then the applicant will have to participate in improving the traffic system. CPA- 03 -13, CPA- 05 -13, CPA- 06-13, CPA-07-13, CPA- 08-13, CPA- 09-13, CPA -1043 No comments A cornment letterfrom Kristi heeldon for CPA -01 -13 is incorporated into the record. A comment letter was rceeived from Harlan Douglass for CPA -03 -13 is incorporated into record. Planning Commission Minutes Pufe 3 of Public Hearing eras closed at 7:02 pm. CPA -01 -13 Motion: CormmOsOner Neill made to onolion to cVprovo crud forward to the Cris Council CPA -01 -13 as prevented, seconded and this motion was passed unaniWously_ Discussion: Commissioner Carlson stated that the amendment was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the development regulations. Commissioner Stoy stated that the proposed amendment would make a nice clean line with the adjacent Garden Office, classification. CPA -02 -13 Moliow Commissioner S(ay made a motion to approve and forward 10 the Ciry C Dune d CP.4 -02 -13 av prerenled, five ,yes, one no and one recused (Commissioner Anderson) due io having afamily member rrffecled by the proposed change. Discussion; Commissioner Carlsen Mated that the amendment was not consistent with goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan and would affect the character of the adjacent single- family development. Comirtissioner Sates stated that the amendment was a natural progression of the existing multifamily development to the east. Commissioner Phillips stated that the site was an appropriate place for multifamily development. Commissioner Stoy stated that this was a great place for a smal l continuation of multifamily development, Stopped for a ten - minute brenk at 7:15 pm. Resumed at 7.25 pm. CPA. -03 -13 Hocion, Commissioner Slay made a notion w approve and forward to the City Council CPA -03 -13 as presented, seconded and this rr onion was passed unanimously. Disewsloti: Commissioner Dates stated that they had received a letter from Harlan Douglass asking for his property to remain in the Office designation. Commissioner Stoy stated the amendment is appropriate considering it would make the parcels Conforming rises. Commissioner Stoy asked Legal if there were any issues with changing the property to conform without the property owners consent. Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney, stated that the Commission should base their decision on the consistency with the Gh4A, the Comprehensive Plan, and the Development Regulations. He further stated that the courts have found that The policy behind legislative zoning is to eliminate non - conforming rises. Commissioner Neill asked Mr- Lamb if by changing the Zone it would affect Mr, Douglass in any way. Mr. Lamb stated that with discussion with Mr. Basinger and Mr. Kithta that they had not identified any negative impacts associated with the amendment- As Mr. Basinger stated, the zoning would allow all of the same uses as Office and the County Assessor stated that the taxes would not change, Comniissianer Bates stated that he felt that the letter did not provide enotagii information on why the property owner did not want die amendment and thought that they should have provided a representative at the public hearing to express their interests. Commissioner Carlsen stated that the amendnrrcni should be approved as recommended by staff including all the properties. Commissioner McCaslin stated that the property awner should have sent a representative if they had concerns regarding the amendment. Planning Commission M intges Page 4 of 6 CPA -D5 -13 Motion; Corr missloner Carlson made a motion to approve and fort -vend to than City ColdnVil CPA -05 -13 as presented, seconded aNd this motion was passed tonanimously. Discussion: Commissioner Bates asked why the vacant and partially used land went up and why the net developable acres went down in Table 2.1 Land Capacity Analysis. Mr. ]Basinger, Senior Planner, stated that therc are many variables that go into the City's laid capacity analysis. Mr. Basinger further stated that lie would be happy to provide the Commission with a detailed report on land quantity analysis at a future date. CPA -0b -l3 Motion, Commissioner Carlsen made ca matron to approve andforward ro the City Council CPA - X16 -1.3 as presented, seconded and this nmolion i +as passeii unanimo -tsly. Discussion: None CPA -07 -13 Motion: Commissioner Neill made a motion to approve card for iv ar•d to Me City Council CPA -07 -13 as presented, smeonded and this inotton was passed tlnaninZously. Discussion: hone CPA -08 -13 Commissioner Carlson made a motion lo approve cend forward to the City C'aurted CPA - 08 -13 as presented, seconded and this mohon weds passed -Unanimously, Discussion: None CPA -09 -13 Commissioner Curlsen made a manor fo approve and forty and to floe Ciry Council CPA- 09- 13 us- presented Discussion: Commissioner Anderson stated that he thought some of the wording could not be defined and should be removed. The Commission determined that some of the language should be modified (see he] ow). A motion on the table discussion was to make same changes try the motioij as follows: I. NP -2.5 remove (grocery stores and). I NP -2.3 remove (social capital and replace Mth community interaction). I NP -2.6 remove (and recognize). Commissioner Carlsen made a motion to amend the originai arallan CPA -09 -13 to Wor'por ale the changes NP-2.5 remove (grocery stores and), NP -2.3 remove (socifel capital and replace with earrrm pity interaction), and NP -2,6 remove (arid recognize), seconded and this motion was passed unanimorrcly, Main »fiction as ainended: PI41111111g Commission Minutes Pkge 5 of Commissioner Carlsen made a mufian to approve and forward CPA -09 -13 ojirh the changes inc orpar afed and to forward to the Wily Council as presented, seconded and I&Y mirror was passed unan n ;ously. CPA-10-13 Commissioner aSloy made a motion to appxore and forward to the City Counvil CFA -10 -13 asl2i•esuntcd, secanded and this mod on ivas passed unanimeusly. Discussion: Commissioner Stoy and Commissioner Bates congratulated Mr- Basinger on the development of the Bike and Pedestrian program, X. GOOD or THE OIRWE R There was nothing for the good of the order_ X1. ADJOURNMENT The being no other business the meeting was adjourned at 834 p.m. "-'e F Bill Bates, Chairperson -Z - le- Cari Hinshaw, PC Secretary. Date signed ,� P I Plsnn1ng Cam missicn minutes Nge G of ky COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments June 11, 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments ky COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Comprehensive Planning The Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan (SVCP) is the City's guide for growth and development. • Residential • Industrial • Commercial • Office • Recreation • Roads • Sewer • Water • Utilities Comprehensive Plan Amendments • Buildings • Services • Financing IN ky COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SVCP Amendment Process • City Council approves official docket • November 1St cut off for applications (60 -day notice) • Planning Commission recommendation • City Council approval • Growth Management Hearing Board Appeals Comprehensive Plan Amendments ky COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Privately Initiated Map Amendment Applicant(s): Application Description Arger Co. Real Estate, Inc. 300 Mullan Road Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Change the west 131 feet of parcel 45143.1328 from Low Density Residential to Office Comprehensive Plan Amendments j.*;,()k0�vn.e1 ky COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �J _0 v �s 0 V Barker High School and Learning r � n Broadway Ave I i ■� � I rrf �J COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT r JLAjE 2J4a MRAW k,.....�..; _ . Al I 7 W1 Sprin ,gfie r*oAwr MW 11 Comprehensive Plan Amendments 6 1*()k�a�ne COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .;w0valky �J Comprehensive Plan Amendments 7 ky COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �J Comprehensive Plan Amendments 8 ky COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �J Comprehensive Plan Amendments 9 ky COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �J PC Recommendation • PC voted 7 -0 to recommend approval of CPA -01 -13 ky COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Privately Initiated Map Amendment Project Number CPA-02-1'P Applicant(s): Application Description Whipple Consulting Engineers 2528 North Sullivan Road Spokane Valley, WA 99216 Change parcels 55181.2602 & 55181.2604 from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential Comprehensive Plan Amendments 11 j.*;.()k0�vn.e1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 0 j m r� �I I is �J P ===No = OJINA11 -1 E 077m;mmi 10 m I I 10 m Mission Ave i, I I -FF-1 i s M r� �I '44�, �J Stiat•p Boone Comprehensive Plan Amendments r� w - e 1 13 j.*;,()k0�vn.e1 ky COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT m r� �I I la �J 1*()k�a�ne COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .;w0valky M r-I �I �i a Comprehensive Plan Amendments 15 M r� �I I la 0J COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Ism,= Comprehensive Plan Amendments 16 ky COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT M r� �I I la 0J PC Recommendation • PC voted 5 -1 to recommend approval of CPA -02 -13 • 1 PC member recused himself ky COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City Initiated Map Amendment Applicant(s): Application Description mA City of Spokane Valley 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Change parcels 35231.0603, 35231.9106, 35242.9010,35242-9011, and 35242.9012 from Office to Community Commercial Comprehensive Plan Amendments j.*;,()k0�Vn.e1 ky COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I la �J CPA =a3 =13 'Eighth;Ave 1 :il ■ 1 11 1 �illln 11 1111 1 ■ fllll 111 1111 11 1 ■11 1111 1 Ilfl 111 111 ■11� ■1 11 1�1 �� 1 ■1111 ■1 ■ 111111111111 HE 11 111 ■ X111 ��IIII 1 II1 Comprehensive Plan Amendments 19 ky COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I la 0J Comprehensive Plan Amendments 20 ky COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I la 0J -, zrk I la 0J COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENI Comprehensive Plan Amendments 22 ky COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I la �J Comprehensive Plan Amendments Mi jo - - F 7- Vow-, MIF Comprehensive Plan Amendments ky COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I la 0J PC Recommendation • PC voted 7 -0 to recommend approval of CPA -03 -13 ky COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City Initiated Text Amendments • Add policies to support office uses in MF zones • Update land capacity analysis • Update projected growth PC Recommendation • PC voted 7 -0 to recommend approval of CPA -05 -13 Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2: ky COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City Initiated Text Amendments • Include 2012 transportation improvements • Update Transit section • Add policies to support pavement management PC Recommendation • PC voted 7 -0 to recommend approval of CPA -06 -13 Comprehensive Plan Amendments ky COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City Initiated Text Amendments PC Recommendation PC voted 7 -0 to recommend approval of CPA -07 -13 Comprehensive Plan Amendments 27 ky COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City Initiated Text Amendments PC Recommendation PC voted 7 -0 to recommend approval of CPA -08 -13 Comprehensive Plan Amendments 28 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City Initiated Text Amendments PC Recommendation • PC voted 7 -0 to recommend approval of CPA -09 -13 with the following text modifications • NP -2.5 remove "grocery stores and" • NP -2.3 remove "social capital" and replace with "community interaction" • NP -2.6 remove "and recognize" Comprehensive Plan Amendments 29 ky COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City Initiated Text Amendments • Include 2012 bike and pedestrian improvements • Add policy language to use CDBG funds for sidewalks • Add SUP connection to newly purchased City property PC Recommendation • PC voted 7 -0 to recommend approval of CPA -10 -13 Comprehensive Plan Amendments 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Review Meeting Date: June 11, 2013 Department Director Approval Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First Reading Proposed Ordinance 13 -009: Official Zoning Map amendments GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A, SVMC 17.80.140 and 19.30.0 10 PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: On May 21, 2013, staff presented City Council with an administrative report on the 2013 Comprehensive Plan amendments. City Council requested that parcel 35242.9012 be removed from CPA -03 -13 based upon public comment received by the Planning Commission. BACKGROUND: The Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 17.80.140 establishes an annual comprehensive plan amendment cycle that runs from November 2nd to November 1St of the following year. The Planning Commission considers applications received prior to November 1St in late spring of the following year, with a decision by City Council in late spring/early summer. For the 2013 Comprehensive Plan amendment period, the Community Development Department received two privately initiated requests for site - specific Comprehensive Plan amendments. In addition, the City is initiating one site - specific Comprehensive Plan amendment. Sites approved for a Comprehensive Plan amendment will receive a zoning classification consistent with the new land use designation. On April 25, 2013, staff presented the proposed amendments to the Planning Commission at a study session. On May 9, 2013, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on each of the Comprehensive Plan amendments. After receiving public testimony, the Planning Commission deliberated and voted to forward CPA- 01 -13, CPA- 02 -13, and CPA -03 -13 to City Council with a recommendation for approval. On May 21, 2013, staff presented City Council with an administrative report on the 2013 Comprehensive Plan amendments. City Council conducted a briefing to review the proposed amendments. At the briefing, Council requested that parcel 35242.9012 be removed from CPA - 03-13 to act in accordance with public comment received by the Planning Commission. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PROPOSALS: Comprehensive Plan amendment proposals and corresponding rezone proposals are organized into individual reports consisting of application materials, staff reports, maps, and comments submitted to date to assist the City Council in its review. 1 of 2 OPTIONS: Advance Ordinance No. 13 -009 to second reading with or without modifications, or take other action deemed appropriate. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to advance Ordinance No. 13 -009 to a second reading. STAFF CONTACT: Mike Basinger, AICP, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Draft Ordinance No. 13 -009 with Attachment A Map [Note: Also reference yellow notebook: "2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments." Also note signed Planning Commission Findings and Recommendation, and Signed Planning Commission Minutes included with previous agenda item.] 2 of 2 DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 13 -009 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NO. 07 -015 AND AS SUBSEQUENTLY AMENDED; AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley (City) adopted the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) and the Official City Zoning Map pursuant to Ordinance No. 07 -015, on September 25, 2007; and WHEREAS, the SVMC and Official City Zoning Map became effective on October 28, 2007; and WHEREAS, the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) allows comprehensive plans to be amended annually (RCW 36.70A130); and WHEREAS, amendments to the City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan (Comprehensive Plan) may be initiated by the Planning Commission (Commission), the City Council (Council), citizens, or by the Community Development Director based on citizen requests or when changed conditions warrant adjustments; and WHEREAS, the GMA requires comprehensive plans to be implemented with development regulations, including the zoning of property consistent with land use map designations; and WHEREAS, zone changes under consideration with the annual Comprehensive Plan amendments are to be considered as area -wide rezones pursuant to SVMC 17.80.140; and WHEREAS, consistent with the GMA, City adopted Public Participation Guidelines to direct the public involvement process for adopting and amending comprehensive plans and area -wide rezones; and WHEREAS, the SVMC provides that amendment applications shall be received until November 1 of each year; and WHEREAS, the Official City Zoning Map has been amended by Ordinance 07 -027, Ordinance No. 08 -012, Ordinance No. 09 -009, Ordinance No. 09 -040, Ordinance No. 10 -008, Ordinance No. 11- 002, Ordinance No. 11 -008, Ordinance 11 -010, Ordinance No. 12 -015, and Ordinance 12 -019; and WHEREAS, applications were submitted by the applicant, owner or by City staff to amend the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps for the purpose of beneficially using the property described herein; and WHEREAS, following the application to the City, staff conducted an environmental review to determine the potential environmental impacts from the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, on April 19, 2013, after reviewing the environmental checklists, staff issued Determinations of Non - Significance (DNS) for the proposals, published the DNS in the Valley News Herald, and where appropriate posted the DNS on the sites and mailed the DNS to all affected public agencies; and Ordinance 13 -009 Zoning Map Changes Page 1 of 5 DRAFT WHEREAS, on April 19, 2013, notice of the Commission public hearing was published in the Valley News Herald; and WHEREAS, on April 19, 2013, notice of the Commission hearing was mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of the subject property; and WHEREAS, on April 19, 2013, notice of the hearing was posted on the subject properties; and WHEREAS, on April 25, 2013, the Commission conducted a briefing to review the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, on May 9, 2013, the Commission received evidence, information, public testimony, and a staff report and recommendation at a public hearing; and WHEREAS, on May 9, 2013, the Commission conducted a public hearing to consider proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. After receiving public testimony, the Commission deliberated and voted to forward CPA- 01 -13, CPA- 02 -13, CPA- 03 -13, CPA- 05 -13, CPA- 06 -13, CPA- 07 -13, CPA - 08-13, CPA- 09 -13, and CPA -10 -13 to Council with a recommendation for approval; and WHEREAS, on May 10, 2013, the Washington State Department of Commerce was notified pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106 providing a notice of intent to adopt amendments to the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, on May 21, 2013, Council conducted a briefing to review the proposed amendments. At the briefing, Council requested that parcel 35242.9012 be removed from CPA -03 -13 to adhere to the property owner's request that his property not be subject to the amendments set forth in CPA- 03 -13; and WHEREAS, on June 11, 2013, Council considered a first ordinance reading to adopt the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, on July 9, 2013, Council considered a second ordinance reading at which time Council approved written findings of fact setting forth the basis for recommending approval of the proposed amendments. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley do ordain as follows: Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the Official Zoning Map, originally adopted through Ordinance No. 07 -015 and as subsequently amended, in order to permit the property described herein to be used in a matter consistent with the same. Section 2. Findings. The Council acknowledges that the Commission conducted appropriate investigation and study and held a public hearing on the proposed amendments to Comprehensive Plan, and the Council hereby approves the amendments to the Comprehensive Plan map and text, with a modification to CPA -03 -13 to remove parcel 35242.9012 from CPA- 03 -13. The Council has read and considered the Commission's findings. The Council hereby makes the following findings: 1. Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 17.80.140 provides the framework for the public to participate throughout the Comprehensive Plan and Official City Zoning Map amendment process, including notice and public hearing requirements. Ordinance 13 -009 Zoning Map Changes Page 2 of 5 DRAFT 2. On April 19, 2013, notice for the proposed amendments was placed in the Valley News Herald and each site subject to a site - specific amendment was posted with a 'Notice of Public Hearing" sign, with a description of the proposal. 3. On April 19, 2013, individual notice of the site - specific map amendment proposals were mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of each affected site. 4. On May 10, 2013, the Washington State Department of Commerce was provided a notice of intent to adopt amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and Official City Zoning Map. 5. Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act set forth in RCW 43.21C (SEPA), environmental checklists were required for each proposed Comprehensive Plan map and text amendment. 6. Staff reviewed the environmental checklists and a threshold determination was made for each Comprehensive Plan amendment. 7. On April 19, 2013, Determinations of Non - Significance (DNS) were issued for the requested Comprehensive Plan amendments. 8. On April 19, 2013, the DNS's were published in the City's official newspaper, the Valley News Herald, consistent with chapter 21.20 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). 9. The procedural requirements of SEPA and SVMC Title 21 have been fulfilled. 10. The Commission and Council have reviewed the proposed amendments concurrently to evaluate the cumulative impacts. The review was consistent with the annual amendment process outlined in SVMC 17.80.140 and RCW 36.70A. 11. On May 9, 2013, the Commission held a public hearing on each of the Comprehensive Plan amendments. After receiving public testimony, the Commission deliberated and voted to forward CPA- 01 -13, CPA- 02 -13, and CPA -03 -13 to Council with a recommendation for approval. 12. The Commission adopted and incorporated by reference all findings of staff for CPA -01 -013, CPA - 02-13 and CPA -03 -013. Such findings were included with the Commission's findings presented to Council. The Council hereby adopts and incorporates by reference all findings of staff for CPA -01- 013, CPA- 02 -13, and CPA -03 -013, as recommended by the Commission; and with the modification to remove parcel 35242.9012 from CPA- 03 -13. 13. The proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are consistent with GMA and do not result in internal inconsistencies within the Comprehensive Plan itself. 14. The site - specific map amendments will provide suitable land use designations consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 15. The goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan were considered and the proposed amendments are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 16. Findings were made and factors were considered to ensure compliance with approval criteria contained in SVMC 17.80.140H (Comprehensive Plan amendments and area -wide rezones). Ordinance 13 -009 Zoning Map Changes Page 3 of 5 DRAFT 17. The Comprehensive Plan land use map amendments will not adversely affect the public's general health, safety, and welfare. Section 3. Propert y. The properties subject to this Ordinance are described in Attachment "A Section 4. Map Amendments. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130, the City of Spokane Valley Zoning Map, as originally adopted through Ordinance No. 07 -015 and as subsequently amended, is hereby amended as set forth in Attachment "A" (map). The Zoning Map amendments are generally described as follows: Map Amendments File No. CPA -01 -13 Proposal: Site - specific Comprehensive Plan map amendment requesting to change the designation from Low Density Residential (LDR) with a Single - Family Residential (R -3) zoning classification to an Office (0) designation with a Garden Office (GO) zoning classification. Applicant: Arger Co. Real Estate, Inc., 300 N Mullan Road, Spokane Valley, WA 99206. Amendment Location: West 131 feet of parcel 45143.1328; generally located south of Springfield Avenue east of Evergreen Road; further located in the NW %4 of the SW %4 of Section 14, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. Council Decision: Change the west 131 feet of parcel 45143.1328 to Garden Office (GO). File No. CPA -02 -13 Proposal: Site - specific Comprehensive Plan map amendment requesting to change the designation from Low Density Residential (LDR) with a Single - Family Residential (R -3) zoning classification to a High Density Residential (HDR) designation with a High Density Multifamily Residential (MF -2) zoning classification. Applicant: Dennis Crapo, 2602 North Sullivan Road, Spokane Valley, WA 99216. Amendment Location: Parcels 55181.2602 and 55181.2604; generally located south of Sharp Avenue west of Barker Road; further located in the NE %4 of the NE %4 of Section 18, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. Council Decision: Change parcels 55181.2602 and 55181.2604 to High Density Multifamily Residential (MF -2). File No. CPA -03 -13 Proposal: Site - specific Comprehensive Plan map amendment requesting to change the designation from Office (0) with an Office (0) zoning classification to a Community Commercial (C) designation with a Community Commercial (C) zoning classification. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206. Amendment Location: Parcels 35231.0603, 35231.9106, 35242.9010, and 35242.9011; generally located south of Interstate 90 and north of 4th Avenue; further located in Sections 23 & 24, Township 25 North, Range 43 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. Council Decision: Change parcels 35231.0603, 35231.9106, 35242.9010, and 35242.9011 to Community Commercial (C). File No. CPA- 04 -13: Withdrawn Ordinance 13 -009 Zoning Map Changes Page 4 of 5 DRAFT Section 5. Zoning Map /Official Controls. Pursuant to RCW 35A.63.100, for the purpose of regulating the use of land and to implement and give effect to the Comprehensive Plan, the City hereby amends the Official City Zoning Map as set forth in Attachment "A ". Section 6. Adoption of Other Laws. To the extent that any provision of the SVMC, or any other law, rule, or regulation referenced in the attached Zoning Map(s) is necessary or convenient to establish the validity, enforceability, or interpretation of the Zoning Map(s), then such provision of the SVMC, or other law, rule, or regulation is hereby adopted by reference. Section 7. Map - Copies on File- Administrative Action. The Zoning Map is maintained in the office of the City Clerk as well as the City Department of Community Development. The City Manager or designee, following adoption of this Ordinance, is authorized to modify the Zoning Map in a manner consistent with this Ordinance. Section 8. Liabili . The express intent of the City is that the responsibility for compliance with the provisions of this Ordinance shall rest with the permit applicant and their agents. This Ordinance and its provisions are adopted with the express intent to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the general public and are not intended to protect any particular class of individuals or organizations. Section 9. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 10. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council this day of July, 2013 Mayor, Thomas E. Towey ATTEST: City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge Approved As To Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 13 -009 Zoning Map Changes Page 5 of 5 Zoning Map 11-n1 w CPA -01 -13 City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department eld il AM Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map designation from LDR to O; subsequent zoning change from R -3 to GO. Zoning Map CPA -02 -13 City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map designation from LDR to HDR; subsequent zoning change from R -3 to MF -2. Zoning Map �P 11■ r I I � e ' . I � 0 O O I 1 ■■ ■� �Il� mmms � Imo■ ■� � � E �; . ■■ a II � F� � �� ■11 ■111 ■ ■■ �� e� � ■1 ■111■ ,� � �� a� . ■11 ■1111■ 1 ■ ■ ■1■ c i ■111111 ■1 ■I■ ■� ■ 111■ .11011111ll� ■ ■ ■ ■1 ■1 ■■■■� III ■�■■ ■1111' �� . 11, ■■ ■1111. 11111 ■1111■ ■■� ■■■ NIEMEN i CPA -03 -13 Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map City of Spokane Valley designation from O to C; subsequent zoning Community Development Department change from 0 to C. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 11, 2013 Department Director Approval: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed Resolution 13 -006: Adoption of the 2014-2019 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010, Perpetual advanced six -year plans for coordinated transportation program expenditures. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: April 2, 2013 Admin. Report on Draft Six Year TIP Project List; May 7, 2013 Admin. Report on Draft Six year TIP; and May 28, 2013 Public Hearing on Draft 2014 -2019 Six Year TIP. BACKGROUND: The City is required by RCW 35.77.010 to prepare and, after conducting a public hearing, adopt a revised and extended comprehensive transportation program for the ensuing six calendar years. This plan must be submitted to the Washington State Secretary of Transportation by July 1s' of each year. The attached draft Six Year TIP incorporates comments received from previous Council meetings. This year's TIP continues with an emphasis on street preservation projects in accordance with council goals. Projects included in the Pavement Management Plan have been collectively identified under the title "20XX Street Preservation project" for each year in this six -year TIP. Staff reviewed historical funding levels for federal, state and City funds from the past five years to estimate projected funding levels available during the next six years. The Six -Year TIP is required to be fiscally constrained and reflect realistic expectations of annual funding levels. Other needed and worthwhile projects that do not fit within the amount of funding anticipated from state and federal grants and City revenues are shown in the `Unfunded List' of projects. OPTIONS: 1) Adopt the 2014 -2019 Six Year TIP as presented, or 2) Adopt the 2014 -2019 Six Year TIP with revisions. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Resolution 13 -006, adopting the 2014 -2019 Six Year TIP as presented. BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The proposed TIP has been developed to account for historical levels of state and federal grant funding assistance. Staff will coordinate with the Finance Department as projects identified in the TIP move forward and as grant opportunities become available to ensure local match requirements can be met. STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Worley, P.E. - Senior Capital Projects Engineer ATTACHMENTS: 1) Resolution 13 -006; 2) 2014 -2019 TIP, 3) Unfunded Projects List, 4) Categorized List of Projects, 5) Annual List of Projects; 6) Map of 2014 -2019 Six Year TIP DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 13 -006 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE 2014 -2019 SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, AND OTHER MATTERS RELATED THERETO. WHEREAS, to provide for the proper and necessary development of the street system within the City of Spokane Valley, the City shall, as required by State law, develop and adopt annually a Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program ( "TIP ") with such program acting as a guide for the coordinated development of the City's transportation system; and WHEREAS, the TIP of the City shall specifically set forth those projects and programs of both City and regional significance that benefit the transportation system and promote public safety and efficient vehicle movements; and WHEREAS, the Six Year TIP shall be consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan and be adopted following one or more public hearings before the City Council; and WHEREAS, a draft copy of the Six Year TIP was submitted to the Washington State Department of Commerce and has been reviewed and approved prior to the scheduled adoption of the TIP in accordance with RCW 36.70A.106; and WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing on May 28, 2013, for the purpose of inviting and receiving public comment on the proposed Six Year TIP. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, as follows: The City Council hereby adopts the attached Six Year TIP for the City of Spokane Valley for the purpose of guiding the design, development and construction of local and regional transportation improvements for the years 2014 through 2019. The City Clerk is directed to file the 2014 -2019 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program with the Washington State Secretary of Transportation not later than June 30. The TIP shall be reviewed at least annually for the purpose of determining the work to be accomplished under the program and the City transportation requirements. Adopted this I Ith day of June, 2013. City of Spokane Valley Thomas E. Towey, Mayor ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Resolution 13 -006, Adopting Six -Year TIP ,;o* VA ey City of Spokane Valley Public Works Department 2014 - 2019 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Resolution 13 -006, Adopted on June 11, 2013 amah Fundina Sources: • ARRA • BR • City • CDBG • CMAQ • Developers • EECBG • FHWA • FMSIB • HUD • REET • Other Fed • Other RR • Other State • SP • SRTS • SW • STA • STP(E) • STP(U) • TA • TIB • UAP • UCP • WSDOT • WTSC • WUTC City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works 2014 — 2019 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Glossary & Abbreviations American Recovery & Reinvestment Act Bridge Replacement Program City Funds Community Development Block Grant Congestion Management/Air Quality Private Developer Funds Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Federal Highway Administration Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Program Housing & Urban Development Real Estate Excise Tax Misc. Federal Funding Sources Railroad Funding Misc. State Funding Sources TIB Sidewalk Program Safe Routes to School City Stormwater Funds Spokane Transit Authority Surface Transportation Program (Enhancement) Surface Transportation Program (Urban) Transportation Alternatives Transportation Improvement Board TIB Urban Arterial Program TIB Urban Corridor Program Washington Department of Transportation Washington Traffic Safety Commission Washington Utilities & Transportation Commission Fundina Status: Ifs ftt` •��11 • S Project Funding is Secured • P Project Funding is Planned. The Most Probable Funding Sources have been Identified. Project Phases: • PE Preliminary Engineering • RW Right -of -Way • CN Construction Construction Tvae: • PCC Portland Cement Concrete • HMA Hot Mix Asphalt • ITS Intelligent Transportation System (Integrated Traffic Signal Control Systems) Street Functional Classifications: Urban: • 14 Principal Arterial • 16 Minor Arterial • 17 Collector Arterial • 19 Local Access s,, 2014 - 2019 Spokane Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program ValleyDollars in Thousands Funding Project / Description / Current Status Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total 1 Argonne Road - 190 to Trent 0.38 0 0 582 582 City 79 S CMAQ 503 Revise Signal Phasing, Add NB Right Turn Lane at Montgomery, Intersection Improvements at Knox Funding Secured (SRTC 06 -31), City Project #0060 Project Total 582 2 Mission Ave. - Flora Rd. to Barker Rd. (PE /RW) 1 148 400 0 548 City 74 S STP(U) 474 Reconstruct with curb, sidewalks, bike lanes and stormwater facilities; PE & RW Funding Secured, (SRTC #09 -01) City Project #0123, 79 503 582 74 474 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/3/2013 Page 1 Project Total 548 548 3 Spokane Valley- Millwood Trail - SCC to 6.5 440 0 0 440 City s Evergreen Rd (PE) STP(E) 440 440 Construct Shared Use Pathway on abandoned Railroad Right -of -way PE Funded; SRTC #TE10 -04; City Project #0145 Project Total 440 440 4 Sullivan / Euclid Concrete Intersection (PE) 0 53 0 0 52 City 7 7 S STP(U) 45 45 Reconstruct intersection in concrete pavement Funding secured for PE & RW, (SRTC #09 -06); City Project #141 Project Total 52 52 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/3/2013 Page 1 Spokane Valley Project / Description / Current Status 2014 - 2019 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Funding Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total 5 Sullivan Road West Bridge 0.08 0 0 16,880 16,880 BR 2,852 2,852 S City 893 893 FMSIB 1,000 1,000 Reconstruct and widen west (southbound) bridge Other 1,945 1,945 Fed UCP 1,750 1,750 Recv'd FMSIB, BR & TIB grants; City Project #0155 Project Total 8,440 89440 6 Mansfield Ave Connection - Pines (SR -27) to 0.21 0 0 951 951 City 13 S 200 -ft East of Houk Rd CMAQ UCP 792 Construct 3 -lane arterial gap connection from Pines to Houk, w/ sidewalk, curb, and stormwater facilities Develop 146 ers PE /RW funded by CMAQ (SRTC #10 -12), CN Funded by TIB( #9 -E- 208(003) -1), City Project #0156 7 Adams St Resurfacing Project - 4th to Sprague 0.25 S Pavement Resurfacing & ADA upgrades CDBG Funded; City Project # 8 Citywide Traffic Sign Project S Replacement of regulatory & warning signs throughout City QRSP funded, City Project # 0181 Project Total 951 5,704 1,786 2,000 3,890 3,500 16,880 13 792 146 951 0 0 195 195 City 27 27 CDBG 168 168 Project Total 195 195 0 0 0 100 100 City Other 100 Fed Project Total 100 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/3/2013 Page 2 100 100 Spakane Valley Project / Description / Current Status 2014 - 2019 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Funding Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total 9 SR -27 (Pines) & Grace Ave. Intersection Safety 0.25 S Safety Improvements, Add left turn -lane HSIP funded; City Project #0166 10 Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study - 1 -90 to 2 S Wellesley Conceptual Planning for Sullivan Road corridor improvements STP Funded; City Project #0177 0 0 523 523 City Other 523 Fed Project Total 523 80 0 0 80 City 11 STP(U) 69 523 523 11 69 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/3/2013 Page 3 Project Total 80 80 11 2014 Street Preservation Project 0 50 0 1,950 2,000 City 2,000 2,000 P Euclid Ave Reconstruction - Flora to E City limits; Evergreen Rd Resurfacing - Sprague to Mission; Mullan Rd Resurfacing - Dishman -Mica to Broadway; Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Vista to Argonne Project Total 2,000 29000 12 Appleway Trail Phase 2 - University to 2 0 0 2,542 2,542 City 343 343 P Evergreen (RW &CN) CMAQ 2,199 29199 Construct Shared Use Pathway along abandoned Railroad Right -of -Way PE funded with City Funds Project Total 29542 29542 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/3/2013 Page 3 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/3/2013 Page 4 2014 - 2019 �„ Spokane six -Year Transportation Improvement Program ValleyDollars in Thousands Funding Project / Description / Current Status Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total 13 ITS Infill Project, Phase 1 0 26 0 302 328 City 4 41 45 P CMAQ 22 261 283 Install ITS controllers and fiber along Broadway, University and Argonne /Mullan routes with existing conduit Project Total 26 302 328 14 Sidewalk Infill Program - Phase 3 0 38 25 592 655 City 12 7 70 89 P CMAQ 75 46 445 566 Complete gaps in sidewalk system throughout City, ADA upgrades Project Total 87 53 515 655 15 Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Argonne to Herald 0.6 60 0 665 725 City 98 98 S STP(U) 627 627 Grind /Overlay; OCI: 33.28 STP Funded Project Total 725 725 16 Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Vista to Argonne 0.5 41 0 629 670 City 91 91 S STP(U) 579 579 Grind /Overlay; OCI: 34.04 STP funded Project Total 670 670 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/3/2013 Page 4 2014 - 2019 �„ Spokane six -Year Transportation Improvement Program ValleyDollars in Thousands Funding Project / Description / Current Status Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total 17 2015 Street Preservation Project 0 50 0 1,950 2,000 City 2,000 2,000 P Dishman -Mica Resurface - Sands to Thorpe; Euclid Ave Recon - West end of City to Sullivan; Flora Rd Recon - Euclid to Trent; Madison Rd Recon - 40th to Thorpe; Mission Ave Resurface - Argonne to Herald; Mullan Rd Resurface - Broadway to Mission Project Total 2,000 2,000 18 Appleway Trail Phase 3 - Evergreen to Corbin 2.35 214 0 2,860 3,074 City 29 386 415 P CMAQ 185 2,474 2,659 Construct Shared Use Pathway along abandoned Railroad Right -of -Way Project Total 214 2,860 3,074 19 Appleway Trail Phase 4 - University Rd. to 0.5 100 400 700 1,200 City 68 94 162 P Balfour Park TA 432 606 1,038 Extend Shared Use pathway to Balfour Park Project Total 500 700 1,200 20 Bowdish Sidewalk - 8th to 12th 0.25 64 65 472 601 City 14 68 82 P SRTS 83 436 519 Construct sidewalk along both sides of Bowdish Project Total 97 504 601 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/3/2013 Page 5 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/3/2013 Page 6 2014 - 2019 t,,, �„ Spokane Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program ValleyDollars in Thousands Funding Project / Description / Current Status Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total 21 Mission Ave. - Flora Rd. to Barker Rd. (CN) 1 0 0 3,416 3,416 City 683 683 P UAP 2,733 2,733 Widen & Overlay with curb, sidewalks, bike lanes and stormwater facilities Project Total 3,416 3,416 22 Park Road #1 Sidewalk Project - Sinto Ave. to 0.44 15 25 416 456 City 5 56 61 p Indiana Ave. SRTS 35 360 395 Construct sidewalk along east side of Park Road from 200 -ft S. of Sinto to Indiana Ave. and 165 -ft gap on Mission Ave. east of Park Rd Project Total 40 416 456 23 Sullivan Corridor ITS - Indiana to Trent (SR 290) 1.75 105 0 809 914 City 14 109 123 P C MAQ 91 700 791 Extend ITS conduit and contols along Sullivan Corridor Project Total 105 809 914 24 Sullivan Road Resurfacing - Broadway to 0.17 30 0 0 30 City 4 4 S Mission STP(U) 26 26 Grind /Overlay; OCI: 32.49 STP Funded Project Total 30 30 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/3/2013 Page 6 Spokane Valley Project / Description / Current Status 2014 - 2019 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Funding Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total 25 Sullivan Road Resurfacing - Sprague to S Broadway Grind /Overlay; OCI: 31.2 STP Funded 0.5 52 0 788 840 City STP(U) 113 113 727 727 Project Total 840 840 26 2016 Street Preservation Project 0 50 0 1,950 2,000 P Appleway Blvd Resurface -Vista to Dishman -Mica; Dishman -Mica Rd Resurface - Thorpe to S City limits; Euclid Ave Recon - Sullivan to Marietta; Farr Rd Recon -4th to 8th; Progress Rd Recon - Wellesley to Crown City Project Total 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 27 Barker Road / BNSF Grade Separation (PE & 0 3,000 1,600 0 4,599 City 101 256 263 620 P RW Only) Other 180 540 720 Fed Other 611 1,368 1,049 3,028 Fed Construct Grade Separation at Barker /BNSF RR/ Trent (SR290) Other- 38 95 98 231 RR FY09 Federal Earmark for $720K million, $10M received from FMSIB for CN phase Project Total 750 1,899 1,950 4,599 28 Broadway Improvement Project- Flora to 0 543 1,000 4,163 5,706 City 309 833 1,142 P Barker UAP 1,234 3,330 4,564 Extend Broadway arterial to Barker Rd, Realign Broadway connection east of Barker Project Total 1,543 4,163 5,706 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/3/2013 Page 7 Spokane Valley Project / Description / Current Status 2014 - 2019 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Funding Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total 29 2017 Street Preservation Project 0 30 0 1,370 1,400 City P Euclid Ave Recon- Marietta to Flora; Evergreen Rd Resurface -190 to Indiana; Farr Rd Recon - Appleway to 4th; Sprague Ave Resurface -Flora to Corbin; Sprague Ave Resurface -Park to Vista; Sprague Ave Resurface- Sullivan to Conklin Project Total 30 Barker Rd - Spokane River to Euclid P Reconstruct and widen to 3 -lane urban section 31 Broadway @ Argonne /Mullan Concrete P Intersections (CN Only) Reconstruct intersections in concrete pavement 0.53 378 25 2,899 3,302 City UAP Project Total 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 81 580 661 322 2,319 2,641 403 2,899 3,302 0 0 0 2,110 2,110 City 285 285 STP(U) 1,825 1,825 Project Total 2,110 2,110 32 Park Road #2 - Broadway to Indiana (RW & CN) 0.75 0 150 2,877 3,027 City P STP(U) Reconstruct to a 3 -lane section with curb, sidewalks, bike lanes and stormwater facilities Project Total Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/3/2013 Page 8 20 388 408 130 2,489 2,619 150 2,877 3,027 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/3/2013 Page 9 2014 - 2019 �„ Spokane six -Year Transportation Improvement Program ValleyDollars in Thousands Funding Project / Description / Current Status Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total 33 Sullivan / Euclid Concrete Intersection (RW /CN) 0 0 0 1,562 1,562 City 211 211 P STP(U) 1,351 1,351 Reconstruct intersection in concrete pavement Project Total 1,562 1,562 34 2018 Street Preservation Project 0 30 0 1,370 1,400 City 1,400 1,400 P Project Total 1,400 1,400 35 Argonne Road Concrete Pavement- 1 -90 to 0.25 359 0 2,749 3,108 City 359 2,749 3,108 P Montgomery Reconstruct pavement in concrete; OCI: 40.35 (2012) Project Total 359 2,749 3,108 36 Spokane Valley- Millwood Trail - SCC to 6.5 0 100 2,140 2,240 City 14 289 303 P Evergreen Rd (RW &CN) STP(E) 86 1,851 1,937 Construct Shared Use Pathway on abandoned Railroad Right -of -way Project Total 100 2,140 2,240 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/3/2013 Page 9 �„ 2014 - 2019 Spokane six -Year Transportation Improvement Program ValleyDollars in Thousands Funding Project / Description / Current Status Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total 37 2019 Street Preservation Project P 38 Barker Rd - Euclid to 0.1 mi. S. of Trent Ave P (SR290) Reconstruct Barker to 3 -1ane urban section 0 30 0 1,370 1,400 City Project Total 0.75 471 100 0 571 City UAP Project Total Totals: 6,456 3,890 61,882 72,228 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/3/2013 Page 10 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 114 114 457 457 571 571 17,961 16,037 10,097 11,687 9,585 6,860 72,227 Spokane ,;,o0Va11ey 2014 - 2019 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Totals Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/3/2013 Page 1 Secured Projects Federal State Other Planned Projects $10,621 Year Federal State Other City Total Federal State Other City Total 2014 $8,325 $3,542 $146 $1,293 $13,306 $2,296 $0 $0 $2,359 $4,655 2016 $5,550 $2,750 $0 $1,010 $9,310 $1,133 $2,733 $0 $2,861 $6,727 2016 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,632 $1,234 $38 $3,193 $10,097 2017 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,854 $3,652 $95 $3,086 $11,687 2018 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,164 $2,319 $98 $3,004 $9,585 2019 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,851 $457 $0 $4,552 $6,860 Total $13,876 $6,292 $146 $2,303 $22,616 $19,930 $10,396 $231 $19,066 $49,611 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/3/2013 Page 1 Totals Federal State Other City Total $10,621 $3,542 $146 $3,652 $17,961 $6,683 $5,483 $0 $3,871 $16,037 $5,632 $1,234 $38 $3,193 $10,097 $4,854 $3,652 $95 $3,086 $11,687 $4,164 $2,319 $98 $3,004 $9,585 $1,851 $457 $0 $4,552 $6,860 $33,806 $16,687 $377 $21,368 $729227 City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Six -Year TIP Unfunded List Projects w/ No Currently Identified Funding Within Existing Resources Dollars in Thousands Project Name Project Description Total Cost Arterial Improvement Projects Bowdish Road - 16th to Sprague Sprague to 8th: Inlay & Enhancement; 8th to 16th: Reconstruct $2,858 as 2 -lane section w/ curb, sidewalk, bike lanes and new stormwater facilities Bowdish Road - 24th to 16th Reconstruct Roadway as 2 -lane section w/ curb, sidewalk and $2,846 new stormwater facilities; Bowdish Road - 32nd to 24th Reconstruct Roadway as 2 -lane section w/ curb, sidewalk and $2,637 new stormwater facilities; Sullivan Road North Extension (Bigelow Reconstruct and widen the Sullivan Road extension north also $55 Gulch) known as Bigelow Gulch Road to a 4 -lane roadway with 8 -foot shoulders and a 12 -foot two way left turn lane. Wellesley Realignment @ Barker /SR290 Realign connection of Wellesley to Barker Rd and SR290, 3 -lane $5,187 section, Part of Barker /BNSF Grade Separation Bridge Projects Barker Road / BNSF Grade Separation (CN Construct Grade Separation at Barker /BNSF RR/ Trent (SR290) $44,500 Only) Park Road / BNSF Grade Separation Reconstruct Park Road to separate the grades of Park Road and $16,520 the BNSF railroad tracks. Pines Rd / BNSF Grade Separation Construct grade separation at Pines Rd (SR -27) / Trent Ave (SR $45,000 290) / BNSF RR Sullivan Rd / BNSF Grade Separation Upgrade and widen grade separation at Sullivan /BNSF /Trent $45,000 Improvements (SR290) Congestion Improvement Projects Pines Corridor ITS - Sprague to 16th Traffic Signal Control System for Corridor $785 Saltese /Sullivan Traffic Signal Improvements to Intersection, Install Traffic Signal (In $586 coordination w/ Spokane County) Sprague / Barker Traffic Signal Install Traffic Signal $594 SR -27 (Pines) / Mirabeau Parkway Traffic Install Traffic Signal $575 Signal Pedestrian /Bicycle Projects Bowdish Sidewalk - 12th to 16th Construct Sidewalk along both sides of Bowdish Greenacres Trail - Sullivan to E City Limits Construct Shared Use Pathway on abandoned railroad right -of- (RW&CN) way Park Road #2 Sidewalk Project - Marietta Ave. Construct sidewalk along one side of Park Road and 160 -ft gap to Buckeye Ave. on north side of Buckeye Ave east of Park Road Projects listed here have been identified as needed projects, but don't currently have funding identified. Funding for these projects will be pursued as grant opportunities become available. $557 $1,095 $143 6/3/2013 1 of 2 Reconstruction Projects Sprague / Fancher Concrete Intersection Sullivan / Kiernan Concrete Intersection Sullivan / Marietta Concrete Intersection Sprague / Thierman Concrete Intersection Sprague / University Concrete Intersection Sprague / Argonne - Mullan Concrete Intersections Street Preservation Projects Pavement Management Program - Local Access Reconstruct Intersection in concrete pavement $1,572 Reconstruct Intersection in concrete pavement $1,423 Reconstruct intersection in concrete pavement $1,493 Reconstruct intersection in concrete pavement $1,243 Reconstruct intersection in concrete pavement. $1,660 Reconstruct intersections in concrete pavement $2,342 Annual street preservation projects $11,664 $190,335 Projects listed here have been identified as needed projects, but don't currently have funding identified. Funding for these projects will be pursued as grant opportunities become available. 6/3/2013 2 of 2 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Monday, June 03, 2013 Page 1 of 5 City of Spokane Valley Total: $3,082 $16,570 Department of Public Works Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Project Name Projects Listed by Category for the 2014- 2019Six -Year TIP Start Year City Cost Totai Cost Dollars in Thousands Reconstruct and widen west 2014 Arterial Improvements $16,880 (southbound) bridge Project Name Description Start Year City Cost Totai Cost Mission Ave. - Flora Rd. to Barker Reconstruct with curb, sidewalks, 2014 $74 $548 Rd. (PE /RW) bike lanes and stormwater facilities; Mission Ave. - Flora Rd. to Barker Widen & Overlay with curb, 2015 $683 $3,416 Rd. (CN) sidewalks, bike lanes and stormwater facilities Broadway Improvement Project- Extend Broadway arterial to Barker 2016 $1,142 $5,706 Flora to Barker Rd, Realign Broadway connection east of Barker Barker Rd - Spokane River to Euclid Reconstruct and widen to 3 -lane 2017 $661 $3,302 urban section Park Road #2 - Broadway to Indiana Reconstruct to a 3 -lane section with 2017 $408 $3,027 (RW & CN) curb, sidewalks, bike lanes and stormwater facilities Barker Rd - Euclid to 0.1 mi. S. of Reconstruct Barker to 3 -lane urban 2019 $114 $571 Trent Ave (S R290) section Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Monday, June 03, 2013 Page 1 of 5 Total: $3,082 $16,570 Bridge Projects Project Name Description Start Year City Cost Totai Cost Sullivan Road West Bridge Reconstruct and widen west 2014 $1,786 $16,880 (southbound) bridge Barker Road / BNSF Grade Construct Grade Separation at 2016 $620 $4,599 Separation (PE & RW Only) Barker /BNSF RR/ Trent (SR290) Total: $2,406 $21,479 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Monday, June 03, 2013 Page 1 of 5 City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Projects Listed by Category for the 2014- 2019Six -Year TIP Dollars in Thousands Congestion Improvements Project Name Description Start Year City Cost Total Cost Argonne Road - 190 to Trent Revise Signal Phasing, Add NB 2014 $79 $582 Mansfield Ave Connection - Pines (SR -27) to 200 -ft East of Houk Rd Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study - 1 -90 to Wellesley Right Turn Lane at Montgomery, Intersection Improvements at Knox Construct 3 -lane arterial gap connection from Pines to Houk, w/ sidewalk, curb, and stormwater facilities Conceptual Planning for Sullivan Road corridor improvements 2014 2014 Total: $13 $11 $103 $951 $80 $1,613 Pedestrian /Bicycle Program Project Name Description Start Year City Cost Total Cost Spokane Valley- Millwood Trail - SCC Construct Shared Use Pathway on 2014 $0 $440 to Evergreen Rd (PE) abandoned Railroad Right -of -way Appleway Trail Phase 2 - University Construct Shared Use Pathway 2014 $343 $2,542 to Evergreen (RW &CN) along abandoned Railroad Right -of- Way Sidewalk Infill Program - Phase 3 Complete gaps in sidewalk system 2014 $89 $655 throughout City, ADA upgrades Appleway Trail Phase 3 - Evergreen Construct Shared Use Pathway 2015 $415 $3,074 to Corbin along abandoned Railroad Right -of- Way Appleway Trail Phase 4 - University Extend Shared Use pathway to 2015 $162 $1,200 Rd. to Balfour Park Balfour Park Bowdish Sidewalk - 8th to 12th Construct sidewalk along both sides 2015 $82 $601 of Bowdish Park Road #1 Sidewalk Project - Construct sidewalk along east side of 2015 $61 $456 Sinto Ave. to Indiana Ave. Park Road from 200 -ft S. of Sinto to Indiana Ave. and 165 -ft gap on Mission Ave. east of Park Rd Spokane Valley- Millwood Trail - SCC Construct Shared Use Pathway on 2018 $303 $2,240 to Evergreen Rd (RW &CN) abandoned Railroad Right -of -way Total: $1,455 $11,208 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Monday, June 03, 2013 Page 2 of 5 City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Projects Listed by Category for the 2014- 2019Six -Year TIP Dollars in Thousands Safety Program Project Name Description Start Year City Cost Totai Cost Citywide Traffic Sign Project Replacement of regulatory & warning 2014 $0 $100 signs throughout City SR -27 (Pines) & Grace Ave. Safety Improvements, Add left turn- 2014 $0 $523 Intersection Safety lane Total: $0 $623 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Monday, June 03, 2013 Page 3 of 5 City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Projects Listed by Category for the 2014- 2019Six -Year TIP Dollars in Thousands Street Preservation Projects Project Name Description Start Year City Cost iotai Cost Adams St Resurfacing Project - 4th Pavement Resurfacing & ADA 2014 $27 $195 to Sprague upgrades 2014 Street Preservation Project Euclid Ave Reconstruction - Flora to 2014 $2,000 $2,000 Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Argonne to Herald Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Vista to Argonne 2015 Street Preservation Project Sullivan Road Resurfacing - Broadway to Mission Sullivan Road Resurfacing - Sprague to Broadway 2016 Street Preservation Project 2017 Street Preservation Project E City limits; Evergreen Rd Resurfacing - Sprague to Mission; Mullan Rd Resurfacing - Dishman- Mica to Broadway; Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Vista to Argonne Grind /Overlay; OCI: 33.28 Grind /Overlay; OCI: 34.04 Dishman -Mica Resurface - Sands to Thorpe; Euclid Ave Recon - West end of City to Sullivan; Flora Rd Recon - Euclid to Trent; Madison Rd Recon - 40th to Thorpe; Mission Ave Resurface - Argonne to Herald; Mullan Rd Resurface - Broadway to Mission Grind /Overlay; OCI: 32.49 Grind /Overlay; OCI: 31.2 Appleway Blvd Resurface -Vista to Dishman -Mica; Dishman -Mica Rd Resurface - Thorpe to S City limits; Euclid Ave Recon - Sullivan to Marietta; Farr Rd Recon -4th to 8th; Progress Rd Recon - Wellesley to Crown Euclid Ave Recon- Marietta to Flora; Evergreen Rd Resurface -190 to Indiana; Farr Rd Recon- Appleway to 4th; Sprague Ave Resurface -Flora to Corbin; Sprague Ave Resurface -Park to Vista; Sprague Ave Resurface - Sullivan to Conklin 2014 $98 $725 2014 $91 $670 2015 $2,000 $2,000 2015 $4 $30 2015 $113 $840 2016 $2,000 $2,000 2017 $1,400 $1,400 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Monday, June 03, 2013 Page 4 of 5 City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Projects Listed by Category for the 2014- 2019Six -Year TIP Dollars in Thousands 2018 Street Preservation Project 2018 $1,400 $1,400 2019 Street Preservation Project 2019 $1,400 $1,400 Total: $10,533 $12,660 Street Reconstruction Projects Project Name Description Start Year City Cost iotai Cost Sullivan / Euclid Concrete Reconstruct intersection in concrete 2014 $7 $52 Intersection (PE) pavement Broadway @ Argonne /Mullan Reconstruct intersections in concrete 2017 $285 $2,110 Concrete Intersections (CN Only) pavement Sullivan / Euclid Concrete Reconstruct intersection in concrete 2017 $211 $1,562 Intersection (RW /CN) pavement Argonne Road Concrete Pavement - Reconstruct pavement in concrete; 2018 $3,108 $3,108 1 -90 to Montgomery OCI: 40.35 (2012) Total: $3,611 $6,832 Traffic Operations and Maintenance Project Name Description Start Year City Cost iotai Cost ITS Infill Project, Phase 1 Install ITS controllers and fiber along 2014 $45 $328 Broadway, University and Argonne /Mullan routes with existing conduit Sullivan Corridor ITS - Indiana to Extend ITS conduit and contols along 2015 $123 $914 Trent (SR 290) Sullivan Corridor Total: $168 $1,242 Overall Total: $21,358 $72,227 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Monday, June 03, 2013 Page 5 of 5 City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 2014 - 2010 Dollars in Thousands 2014 Balfour Park 2014 Totals: $3,652 $17,961 Item # Project Name Primary Source City Amount Total Amount 1 Argonne Road - 190 to Trent CMAQ 79 582 2 Mission Ave. - Flora Rd. to Barker Rd. (PE /RW) STP(U) 74 548 3 Spokane Valley- Millwood Trail - SCC to STP(E) 0 440 13 Evergreen Rd (PE) CMAQ 7 53 4 Sullivan / Euclid Concrete Intersection (PE) STP(U) 7 52 5 Sullivan Road West Bridge BR 893 8,440 6 Mansfield Ave Connection - Pines (SR -27) to UCP 13 951 25 200 -ft East of Houk Rd City 2,000 2,000 7 Adams St Resurfacing Project - 4th to Sprague CDBG 27 195 8 Citywide Traffic Sign Project Other Fed 0 100 9 SR -27 (Pines) & Grace Ave. Intersection Safety Other Fed 0 523 10 Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study - 1 -90 to STP(U) 11 80 Wellesley 11 Appleway Trail Phase 2 - University to CMAQ 343 2,542 Evergreen (RW &CN) 12 ITS Infill Project, Phase 1 CMAQ 4 26 13 Sidewalk Infill Program - Phase 3 CMAQ 12 87 14 Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Argonne to Herald STP(U) 98 725 15 Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Vista to Argonne STP(U) 91 670 16 2014 Street Preservation Project City 2,000 2,000 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Added Projects are shown in Green Rescheduled Projects shown in Orange Funded Projects are shown in Blue Monday, June 03, 2013 Page 1 of 2 Balfour Park 2014 Totals: $3,652 $17,961 2015 Bowdish Sidewalk - 8th to 12th SRTS 14 97 Item # Project Name Primary Source City Amount Total Amount 5 Sullivan Road West Bridge BR 893 8,440 12 ITS Infill Project, Phase 1 CMAQ 41 302 13 Sidewalk Infill Program - Phase 3 CMAQ 7 53 17 Appleway Trail Phase 3 - Evergreen to Corbin CMAQ 29 214 18 Appleway Trail Phase 4 - University Rd. to TA 68 500 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Added Projects are shown in Green Rescheduled Projects shown in Orange Funded Projects are shown in Blue Monday, June 03, 2013 Page 1 of 2 Balfour Park 19 Bowdish Sidewalk - 8th to 12th SRTS 14 97 20 Mission Ave. - Flora Rd. to Barker Rd. (CN) UAP 683 3,416 21 Park Road #1 Sidewalk Project - Sinto Ave. to SRTS 5 40 Indiana Ave. 22 Sullivan Corridor ITS - Indiana to Trent (SR 290) CMAQ 14 105 23 Sullivan Road Resurfacing - Broadway to Mission STP(U) 4 30 24 Sullivan Road Resurfacing - Sprague to STP(U) 113 840 Broadway 25 2015 Street Preservation Project City 2,000 2,000 2015 Totals: $3,871 $16,037 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Added Projects are shown in Green Rescheduled Projects shown in Orange Funded Projects are shown in Blue Monday, June 03, 2013 Page 1 of 2 2016 Item # Project Name Primary Source City Amount Total Amount 13 Sidewalk Infill Program - Phase 3 CMAQ 70 515 17 Appleway Trail Phase 3 - Evergreen to Corbin CMAQ 386 2,860 18 Appleway Trail Phase 4 - University Rd. to TA 94 700 Balfour Park 19 Bowdish Sidewalk - 8th to 12th SRTS 68 504 21 Park Road #1 Sidewalk Project - Sinto Ave. to SRTS 56 416 33 Indiana Ave. City 1,400 1,400 22 Sullivan Corridor ITS - Indiana to Trent (SR 290) CMAQ 109 809 26 Barker Road / BNSF Grade Separation (PE & Other Fed 101 750 Item # RW Only) Primary Source City Amount Total Amount 27 Broadway Improvement Project - Flora to Barker UAP 309 1,543 28 2016 Street Preservation Project City 2,000 2,000 29 Barker Rd - Spokane River to Euclid 2016 Totals: $3,193 $10,097 2011 Park Road #2 - Broadway to Indiana (RW & CN) STP(U) 388 2,877 Item # Project Name Primary Source City Amount Total Amount 26 Barker Road / BNSF Grade Separation (PE & Other Fed 256 1,899 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Added Projects are shown in Green Funded Projects are shown in Blue Monday, June 03, 2013 Page 2 of 2 RW Only) 27 Broadway Improvement Project - Flora to Barker UAP 833 4,163 29 Barker Rd - Spokane River to Euclid UAP 81 403 30 Broadway @ Argonne /Mullan Concrete STP(U) 285 2,110 Intersections (CN Only) 31 Park Road #2 - Broadway to Indiana (RW & CN) STP(U) 20 150 32 Sullivan / Euclid Concrete Intersection (RW /CN) STP(U) 211 1,562 33 2017 Street Preservation Project City 1,400 1,400 2017 Totals: $3,086 $11,687 2018 Item # Project Name Primary Source City Amount Total Amount 26 Barker Road / BNSF Grade Separation (PE & Other Fed 263 1,950 RW Only) 29 Barker Rd - Spokane River to Euclid UAP 580 2,899 31 Park Road #2 - Broadway to Indiana (RW & CN) STP(U) 388 2,877 34 2018 Street Preservation Project City 1,400 1,400 35 Argonne Road Concrete Pavement - 1 -90 to City 359 359 Montgomery 36 Spokane Valley- Millwood Trail - SCC to STP(E) 14 100 Evergreen Rd (RW &CN) 2018 Totals: $3,004 $9,585 2010 Item # Project Name Primary Source City Amount Total Amount 35 Argonne Road Concrete Pavement - 1 -90 to City 2,749 2,749 Montgomery 36 Spokane Valley- Millwood Trail - SCC to STP(E) 289 2,140 Evergreen Rd (RW &CN) 37 2019 Street Preservation Project City 1,400 1,400 38 Barker Rd - Euclid to 0.1 mi. S. of Trent Ave UAP 114 571 (SR290) 2019 Totals: $4,552 $6,860 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Added Projects are shown in Green Funded Projects are shown in Blue Monday, June 03, 2013 Page 2 of 2 City of Spokane Valley 2014 - 2019 Six Year TIP May 13, 2013 .gonne Road I -90t Trent 7 / NOWN• . 17 E lid fir• 7�■� Rw gi!Lw - , �� I • ■I Madison Roatl Reconshaction 40th to Thorpe J v — Legend Project Year 2014 2017 2015 2018 2016 -2019 Note: Citywide Traffic Sign Projects, ITS Infill Project, Sidewall Infill Program, and 2018/2019 Street Preservation Projects not shown on this map. El 1 :: �r��■I MM 7 / NOWN• . 17 E lid fir• 7�■� Rw gi!Lw - , �� I • ■I Madison Roatl Reconshaction 40th to Thorpe J v — Legend Project Year 2014 2017 2015 2018 2016 -2019 Note: Citywide Traffic Sign Projects, ITS Infill Project, Sidewall Infill Program, and 2018/2019 Street Preservation Projects not shown on this map. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 11, 2013 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Spokane Valley Regional Decant Facility Phase I — Bid Award GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 90.48, Chapter 173 -200 WAC, Title 33 U.S.C. 1251 -1376; Storm and Surface Water Utility: SVMC 3.80; Aquifer Protection Area Fund: RCW 36.36. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council approval to complete Final Design, April 16, 2013; and Council approval of an Interlocal Agreement with the WSDOT, January 29, 2013. BACKGROUND: Plans, specifications, and a bid package for a Phase I of the Decant Project were prepared by KPFF Engineering and city staff for construction starting in June 2013. A second phase of the project is scheduled to go out to bid in about 6 -8 weeks for completion of the overall project by December 2013. Phasing the project was required to expend local match funding budgeted from WSDOT by June 30, 2013 and to establish plant growth in the bottom of the bio- infiltration treatment facility. The project was advertised for bids on May 14 and May 31. Bids are scheduled to be opened on Monday, June 10th. A copy of the bid tabulation will be provided at the Council meeting. OPTIONS: 1) Award the Spokane Valley Regional Decant Facility, Phase 1 Project to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, 2) not award the contract, or 3) provide additional direction to staff. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to award the Spokane Valley Regional Decant Facility, Phase 1 Project to in the amount of $ and authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the construction contract. BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The Spokane Valley Regional Decant Facility Project budget is $980,000 and is being paid for with Ecology grant funds (up to a maximum of $735,000), WSDOT funding of at least $150,000, and City Aquifer Protection Area funds - Fund 403 of $95,000. STAFF CONTACT: Eric Guth — Public Works Director Art Jenkins — Stormwater Engineer ATTACHMENTS: Bid Tabulations to be provided at the Council meeting CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 11, 2013 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information 0 admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Funding Methodology for Lodging Tax GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Imposition of tax, set -up of lodging tax advisory committee and determination of qualified expenditures is governed by RCW 67.28, as amended by Engrossed Substitute House Bill 1253, and SVMC 3.20. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Each year the annual budget development process includes the City Council determined allocation of Lodging Tax proceeds. The February 26, 2013 Council workshop also included an RCA (Request for Council Action form) that discussed developing a formal and repeatable methodology to guide the City Council in future tax allocation decisions, but no action could be taken pending the Washington State Legislatures' deliberations on this topic. BACKGROUND: City of Spokane Valley History Since its inception, the City has made annual distributions of lodging tax monies for the purpose of attracting visitors and tourists to our community. In that time however, no formal and repeatable methodology has been implemented to guide the City Council as to how it should proceed in these matters. At the February 26, 2013 Council workshop, the Council discussed developing a funding methodology. Discussion of a formal funding methodology was placed on hold due to Engrossed Substitute House Bill 1253 (ESHB 1253). At that time, ESHB 1253 was being heavily debated and it was unknown whether it would pass and if it did, what the final provisions would include. Washington State Legislature Engrossed Substitute House Bill 1253 ESHB 1253 was passed and approved May 10, 2013, by the Washington State Legislature. ESHB 1253 addresses the expanded uses of lodging tax that were in place beginning in 2007. The expanded uses were set to lapse June 30, 2013. As adopted, ESHB 1253 amends the uses of lodging tax revenue, application process, selection process, and reporting requirements set forth in RCW 67.28.1816. ESHB 1253 specifically retains the City's authority to use lodging tax revenues to fund: • Tourism marketing. • The marketing and operations of special events and festivals. • The operations and capital expenditures of tourism - related facilities owned or operated by a municipality or public facility district. • The operations (but not capital expenditures) of tourism - related facilities owned or operated by non - profit organizations. The primary change from the current allowable uses is to eliminate the use of lodging tax revenues to fund capital expenditures of tourism - related facilities owned or operated by non- profit organizations. Tourism marketing was also specifically added as an allowable use in ESHB 1253. Other allowable uses remain unchanged. ESHB also establishes new application and reporting procedures. In cities over 5,000 population, applicants must submit their applications to the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee, estimating how money received will result in increases in the number of people traveling for business or pleasure on a trip: Away from their place of residence or business and staying overnight in paid accommodations; To a place 50 miles or more one way from their place of residence or business for the day or staying overnight; or From another country or state outside their place of residence or their business. Selection Process Once applicants submit their application, the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee will review all applications (which must include the estimates listed above). The Lodging Tax Advisory Committee may only select candidates from the applicants. The Lodging Tax Advisory Committee will create a list of candidates and recommended amounts for City Council approval. The City Council may only approve candidates and the recommended amounts from the list provided by the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee. The City Council may choose to make awards to all, some, or none of the recommended candidates in the amounts recommended by the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee. Reporting Requirements Recipients must provide a report to the City describing the actual number of people traveling for business or pleasure on a trip: Away from their place of residence or business and staying overnight in paid accommodations; To a place 50 miles or more one way from their place of residence or business for the day or staying overnight; or From another country or state outside their place of residence or their business. The report must be made available to the City Council and the public and must be furnished to the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee ( JLARC) and the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee. The JLARC will provide biennial reports to the Washington State Legislature. 2013 Lodging Tax Appropriation Timeline The calendar we plan to follow in 2013 for 2014 lodging tax awards is as follows: Wed 9/4/2013 City runs notice in newspaper, places on web site, and sends letters to _ 2013 award recipients and others agencies that may have expressed interest. Fri 10/4/2013 _ Grant proposals are due to City by 4pm (no late submittals will be accepted). Fri 10/11/2013 Applications sent to Lodging Tax Advisory Committee for review. Wed 10/16/2013 * 8:30 am Applicant presentations to Committee. Tues 11/5/2013 Council Study Session Admin Report: LTAC Recommendations to City Council Tues 12/10/2013 * Formal Council Meeting City Council Motion Consideration: Award Lodging Tax for 2014 RCW 67.28.1817 requires that the City wait for a period of at least 45 days after the LTAC meeting before action can be taken by the City Coucil. 12/10/2013 10/16/2013 55 days Because we currently anticipate the 2014 Budget will be adopted on October 22, 2013, it is possible the amount of lodging tax ultimately awarded on December 10, 2013 may differ from the amount appropriated in the budget. If this were to occur, just as we are doing with the lodging tax award in 2013, we will amend the 2014 Budget if necessary. Lodging Tax Appropriation Procedures. Discussion points for the Council to consider may be: • If Council should agree to some but not all of the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee recommendations some money may be "left over." In such a case, would Council wish to have another application round or wait until the following year? • Would Council still like to receive the same application packets provided to the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee? • At what point in the year should Council review Lodging Tax Committee appointments and consider making changes. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: This is a discussion topic and no Council action is being sought at this time. BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The Lodging Tax appropriation ranges from approximately $450,000 to $500,000 per year. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun; Erik Lamb ATTACHMENTS: • Lodging Tax awards — 2008 through 2013. • Hotel /Motel Tax revenue history — 2003 through 2012. 3 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2007 -2013 Lodging Tax Awards Centerplace City directed marketing efforts HUB Sports Center Spokane County Fair & Expo Center Spokane Regional C &V Bureau Spokane Regional Sports Commission Spokane Valley Heritage Museum Spokane Winery Valleyfest 2010 Figure Skating Championships Subtotal Annual Totals \\SV -F52\ Users rmcalhoun\Budgets\2013\Lodging Tax\Award History 12/13/2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Award Award Award Award Award Award - Rd 2-1 Award 90,000 90,000 37,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40,000 30,000 18,250 0 0 306,000 236,000 195,000 250,000 145,000 115,000 120,000 165,000 0 3,250 5,000 5,000 8,300 0 0 0 30,000 27,500 30,000 36,000 15,000 15,000 0 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a 624,300 505,000 387,500 496,000 08 -12 30,000 0 30,000 0 0 55,000 42,600 0 21,100 0 25,900 27,800 0 251,720 184,800 185,000 0 150,200 3,900 1,100 6,400 0 0 0 0 30,000 35,200 0 0 0 261,500 308,720 n/a 570,220 510,500 11SV- FS21UserMmcalhounlTax Revenue\Lodging Tax1201 211 05 hotel motel tax through 2012 12 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Hotel /Motel Tax Receipts through - December • Actual for the years 2003 through 2012 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 211 412 0 1 3 2012 to 2011 Difference $ January 0.00 16,993.58 20,691.03 20,653.49 25,137.92 28,946.96 23,280.21 22,706.96 22,212.21 21,442.32 (770) (3.47 %) February 0.00 18,161.04 19,976.81 20,946,09 25,310.66 24,623.06 23,283.95 23,416.94 22,792.14 21,548.82 (1,243) (5.46 %) March 0.00 18,182.01 22,828.15 24,308.48 29,190.35 27,509.99 25,272.02 24,232.35 24,611.28 25,654.64 1,043 4.24% April 0.00 26,897.82 29,748.41 34,371.82 37,950.53 40,406.02 36,253.63 39,463.49 38,230.49 52,13037 13,900 36.36% May 11,527.32 16,440.37 29,017.66 32,522.06 31,371.01 36,828.53 32,588.80 34,683.32 33,790.69 37,478.44 3,688 10.91% June 32,512.11 53,284.01 35,330.35 34,256.71 36,267.07 46,659.88 40,414.59 39,935.36 41,403.41 43,970.70 2,567 6.20% July 38,580.48 42,120.26 43,841.82 49,744.62 56,281.99 50,421.37 43,950.26 47,385.18 49,311.97 52,818.60 3,507 7.11% August 54,974.74 , 43,649.84 46,852.10 45,916.16 51,120.70 50,818.35 50,146.56 54,922.99 57,451.68 57,229.23 (222) (0.39 %) September 30,718,23 39,390.66 46,746.18 50,126.53 57,260.34 60,711.89 50,817.62 59,418.96 58,908.16 64,298.70 5,391 9.15% October 36,960.11 33,004.62 34,966.85 38,674.17 43,969.74 38,290.46 36,784.36 41,272.35 39,028.08 43,698.90 4,671 11.97% November 23,044.56 32,176.61 26,089.36 36,417.11 36,340.64 35,582.59 34,054.79 34,329.78 37,339.36 39,301.22 1,962 5.25% December 28,825.30 23,142.70 31,740.18 29,147.15 31,377.41 26,290.11 27,131.43 26,776.84 32,523.19 30,432.13 (2,091) (6.43 %) Total Collections 257,142.85 363,443.52 387,828.90 417,084.39 461,57836 467,089.21 423,978.22 448,544.52 457,602.66 490,004.07 32,401 7.08% Budget Estimate 419,000.00 380,000.00 436,827.00 350,000.00 400,000.00 400,000.00 512,000.00 380,000.00 480,000.00 430,000.00 Actual over (under) budg 161,857.15) (16,556.48) (48,998.10) 67,084.39 61,578.36 67,089.21 (88,021.78) 68,544.52 (22,397.34) 60,004.07 Total actual collections as a % of total budget 6137% 95.64% 88.78% 119.17% 115.39% 116.77% 82.81% 118.04% 95.33% n/a % change in annual total collected n/a 41.34% 6.71% 7.54% 10.67% 1.19% (9.23 %) 5.79% 2.02% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of December Page 20 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 11, 2013 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2013 Street Preservation Projects Update GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: March 27, 2012 council approved the Pavement Management Plan Update for 2011; October 30, 2012 council approved the 2013 Budget which included $2.054 million for street preservation projects in 2013; Info Memo on March 5, 2013 with 2013 Street Preservation Projects Update; Bid Award on March 12, 2013 for Phase 1 — Sullivan Road Street Preservation Project; Info Memo on April 2, 2013 with 2013 Street Preservation Projects Update BACKGROUND: Council approved the Pavement Management Plan Update for 2011 which included a list of recommended street preservation projects for 2013. Council also approved the 2013 Budget which included $2.054 million for street preservation projects in 2013 and the list of proposed projects was included in the budget. The proposed projects have been arranged into the following three phases: • Phase 1: Sullivan Road — Indiana to Euclid Sullivan Road — Euclid to Trent • Phase 2: Sprague Ave — Herald to University Sprague Ave (EB only) — Havana to Fancher Sprague Ave — Fancher to Thierman Argonne Road — Sprague to Broadway • Phase 3: Carnahan Road — 8t" to City Limit g414. ,o .M.r-Kinnnn to Cannhor (deleted — needs reconstruction) The Phase 1 project was awarded on March 12 and construction began on April 22. The anticipated completion date is June 14. The design for the Phase 2 projects is 98% complete. Federal grant funds from SRTC were received for the Phase 2 projects. These grant funds will pay for 86.5% of the total project costs. Phase 2 is currently scheduled to go to bid on July 5, 2013. Staff is evaluating the availability of remaining 2013 Street Preservation budget and what projects to include in Phase 3. Below is a summary. • Phase 1: Sullivan Road — 90% complete with Construction o Total estimated cost - $1,250,000 ■ $1,100,000 - Street Preservation work ■ $ 150,000 - stormwater work • Phase 2: Sprague Avenues and Argonne Road — Currently 90% complete with Design • Federal STP(U) grant funds received for this project — $1,522,400 max. • Current estimated cost - $1,572,000 ■ $1,414,000 — street preservation work ■ $ 158,000 — stormwater work o Project funding detail: ■ $1,359,780 — federal STP(U) grant funds (86.5 %) ■ $ 158,000 — Stormwater Fund 402 ■ $ 54,220 — Street Preservation Fund 311 There are also two 2012 Street Preservation projects that have been carried over into 2013. These projects will need to be paid from the 2013 Street Preservation budget. The two projects include: • 2012 Pines Road (Sidewalk Infill Project) — Estimated Cost = $80,000 • 2012 Sprague Ave (Sprague Swale Upgrade) — Estimated Cost = $287,000 In summary, the current estimated cost for the 2013 Street Preservation budget is as follows: Total 2013 Street Preservation Budget: $2,054,141 2013 Phase 1 — Sullivan Road $1,100,000 2013 Phase 2 — Sprague /Argonne $ 54,220 2012 Pines Rd — 16th to 23rd $ 80,000 2012 Sprague Ave — Thierman to Park $ 287,000 Remaining 2013 Budget: $ 532,921 Actual costs will vary based on the bids received for the Phase 2 project. Staff evaluated the project contingency list presented in the 2013 Budget along with the current condition of other streets within the City. Staff recommends the following projects to include in Phase 3: Carnahan Road (8th to Kahuna) $175,000 Indiana Ave West (Pines to STA Park & Ride) $285,000 Indiana Ave East (STA Park & Ride to Mirabeau Parkway) $236,000 Sprague Ave (Park to Vista) $315,000 Total $1,011,000 Additional costs for design, construction engineering /inspection and contingency also need to be added to the above estimates. OPTIONS: 1) Consensus to move ahead with the projects listed above for the 2013 Street Preservation Phase 3 bid, 2) Consensus to move ahead with a revised list of projects for this year's Phase 3 bid, or 3) provide additional direction to staff. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consensus to move ahead with the 2013 Street Preservation Phase 3 projects as presented. BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Council approved $2.054 million in the 2013 Budget for the 2013 Street Preservation projects. However, according to information from our Finance Department, there is $949,000 of unspent funds from last year's 2012 Street Preservation Program. These funds can be used to make up difference between in the cost to complete the projects listed above. A summary of the Estimated 2013 Street Preservation costs are as follows. Description Amount 2013 Street Preservation Budget $2,054,141 2013 Phase 1 $1,100,000 2013 Phase 2 $ 54,220 2012 Street Preservation Carryover Projects Pines Road $ 80,000 Sprague Ave $ 287,000 Estimated 2013 Balance for Phase 3 $ 532,921 Unspent 2012 Preservation Funds $ 478,079 Potential 2013 Phase 3 Budget $1,011,000 STAFF CONTACT: Eric Guth, Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA For Planning Discussion Purposes Only as of June 6, 2013; 8:30 a.m. Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative To: Council & Staff From: City Clerk, by direction of City Manager Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings June 18, 2013, Special Mtg: Budget Wrkshp, 9:30 a.m. — 4:30 p.m. (Council Chambers) [due Mon, June 10] June 18, 2013, Special Mtg: Joint Meeting; 6:00 p.m. — about 8 p.m. [due Mon, June 10] Joint Meeting w/ Spokane Valley Planning Commission, City Hall Council Chambers. Topic: Development regulations for the Shoreline Master Plan June 25, 2013 No Meeting. Councilmembers Attend AWC Conference in Tri- Cities July 2, 2013, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, June 24 1. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 2. Info Only: (a) Dept Reports, (b) Planning Commission Minutes (originally due for the June 25 meeting) July 9, 2013, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, July 11 Proclamation: Parks and Recreation Month (5 minutes) 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance Comp Plan — Mike Basinger (10 minutes) 3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance, Zoning Map — Mike Basinger (10 minutes) 4. Admin Report: Communications Franchise Draft, Zayo Renewal — Cary Driskell (10 minutes) 5. Advance Agenda — Mayor Towey (5 minutes) 6. Info Only: (a) TIB Grant Requests [ *estimated meeting: 45 minutes] Julv 16.2013. Studv Session Format. 6:00 D.M. 1. State Adopted Code — Doug Powell 2. Capital Projects Update — Eric Guth 3. TIB Grant Requests — Eric Guth 4. City Hall Concepts — John Hohman, Doug Mitchell 5. Advance Agenda — Mayor Towey [due Mon, July 81 (20 minutes) (20 minutes) (15 minutes) (60 minutes) (5 minutes) [ *estimated meeting: 120 minutes] July 23, 2013, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, July 151 July Community Recognition, Presentation of Key and Certificate Mayor Towey (5 minutes) I. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 3. First Reading Proposed Ordinance, Zayo Franchise Renewal — Cary Driskell (10 minutes) 4. Information Only: Dept Reports; Planning Commission Minutes [ *estimated meeting: minutes] July 30, 2013, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda August 6, 2013 NO MEETING (National Night Out) [due Mon, July 221 (5 minutes) August 13, 2013, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon July 291 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance, Zayo Franchise Renewal — Cary Driskell (10 minutes) 3. Admin Report: 2014 Budget — Estimated revenues & expenditures — Mark Calhoun (20 minutes) Draft Advance Agenda 6/6/2013 11:54:11 AM Page 1 of 4 August 20, 2013, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda [due Mon, Aug 121 (5 minutes) August 27, 2013, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Aug 191 August Community Recognition, Presentation of Key and Certificate Mayor Towey (5 minutes) 1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2014 Budget revenues (including prop taxes) —Mark Calhoun (15 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes, Motion setting 9 -24 budget hearing) (5 minutes) 3. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 4. Information Only: (a) Dept Reports; (b) Planning Commission Minutes [ *estimated meeting: minutes] Sept 3, 2013, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Aug 261 1. Outside Agency Presentations (Economic Development Agencies) ( -40 minutes) 2. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [ *estimated meeting: 45 minutes] Sept 10, 2013, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Sept 21 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Outside Agency Presentations (social service agencies, 5 min each) — Mark Calhoun ( -45 minutes) 3. Presentation of 2014 Preliminary Budget — City Manager Jackson (30 minutes) 4. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [ *estimated meeting: 85 minutes] Sept 17, 2013, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Sept 9 1. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) Sept 24, 2013, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Sept 161 Sept Community Recognition, Presentation of Key and Certificate Mayor Towey (5 minutes) 1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2014 Proposed Budget — Mark Calhoun (15 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes) 3. First Reading Property Tax Ordinance — Mark Calhoun (10 minutes) 4. Motion Consideration: Allocations to Outside Agencies — Mark Calhoun (20 minutes) 5. Admin Report: Budget Amendment for 2013 — Mark Calhoun (15 minutes) 6. Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 7. Information Only: (a) Dept Reports; (b) Planning Commission Minutes [ *estimated meeting: 75 minutes] Oct 1, 2013, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. I. CDBG Potential Projects — Scott Kuhta 2. Advance Agenda Oct 8, 2013, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. I. PUBLIC HEARING: CDBG Projects — Scott Kuhta 2. PUBLIC HEARING: 2013 Budget Amendment — Mark Calhoun 3. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 4. Second Reading Property Tax Ordinance — Mark Calhoun 5. First Reading Ordinance Amending 2013 Budget — Mark Calhoun 6. First Reading Ordinance Adopting 2014 Budget — Mark Calhoun 7. Motion Consideration: Approval of CDBG Projects — Scott Kuhta 8. Advance Agenda [due Mon, Sept 23) (20 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Mon, Sept 301 (10 minutes) (15 minutes) (5 minutes) (10 minutes) (10 minutes) (10 minutes) (10 minutes) (5 minutes) [ *estimated meeting: 75 minutes] Draft Advance Agenda 6/6/2013 11:54:11 AM Page 2 of 4 Oct 15, 2013, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. I. Advance Agenda [due Mon, Oct 71 (5 minutes) Oct 22, 2013, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Oct 141 Oct Community Recognition, Presentation of Key and Certificate Mayor Towey (5 minutes) I. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Second Reading Ordinance Amending 2013 Budget — Mark Calhoun (10 minutes) 3. Second Reading Ordinance Adopting 2014 Budget — Mark Calhoun (10 minutes) 4. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 5. Information Only: Dept Reports; Planning Commission Minutes [ *estimated meeting: 35 minutes] Oct 29, 2013, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda Nov 5, 2013, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Recommendations to Council — Mark Calhoun 2. Advance Agenda Nov 12, 2013, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Admin Report: 2014 Fee Resolution — Mark Calhoun 3. Advance Agenda Nov 19, 2013, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. Nov Community Recognition, Presentation of Key and Certificate Mayor Towey 1. Advance Agenda [due Mon, Oct 23]] (5 minutes) [due Mon, Oct 281 (20 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Mon, Nov 41 (5 minutes) (15 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Mon, Nov 111 (5 minutes) (5 minutes) Nov 26 2013, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Nov 181 Oath of Office to Councilmember Position #1 (completing term vacated by B. Grassel) (5 minutes) 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Information Only: Dept Reports; Planning Commission Minutes Dec 3, 2013, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda Dec 10, 2013, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. Dec Community Recognition, Presentation of Key and Certificate Mayor Towey I. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Proposed Resolution Amending Fee Resolution for 2014 — Mark Calhoun 3. Motion Consideration: Lodging Tax Allocations for 2014 — Mark Calhoun 4. Advance Agenda Dec 17, 2013, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. Oath of Office to Councilmembers (Positions 1, 4, 5, 7) 1. Advance Agenda Dec 24, 2013 no meeting — Christmas Eve Dec 31, 2013 no meeting — New Year's Eve January 7, 2014, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Council Officer Elections (select Mayor and Deputy Mayor) — Chris Bainbridge [due Mon, Nov 25) (5 minutes) [due Mon, Dec 21 (5 minutes) (5 minutes) (10 minutes) (25 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Mon, Dec 91 ( 10 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Mon, Dec 301 (10 minutes) Draft Advance Agenda 6/6/2013 11:54:11 AM Page 3 of 4 OTHER PENDING AND /OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: ADA Transition Plan Appleway Landscaping Appleway Trail Arts Council Bidding Contracts (SVMC 3. — bidding exceptions) Coal Train EIS Comprehensive Plan Updates (chapters 2 & 5) Economic Development (long term goals) Future Acquisition Areas Gateway, Regional MOU Land Quantity Inventories: Industrial & Residential Manufactured Home Zoning PEG Funds (Education) Public Safety Contract, Proposed Amendment Revenue Policy, Cost Recovery Sign Code Modifications Solid Waste Analysis Speed Limits (overall system) Spokane Valley Day at the Fair (Sept 10, 2013) Sprague Avenue Parking Regional Transportation Issues Townhouses in Garden Office *time for public or Council comments not included Draft Advance Agenda 6/6/2013 11:54:11 AM Page 4 of 4 spot\ ,;oOValley 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax; 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhatL@spokanevalley.org Memorandum To: Mike Jackson, City Manager From: Mark Calhou finance Director Date: June 4, 2013 Re Finance Department Activity Report — May 2013 Following is information pertaining to Finance Department activities through the end of May 2013 and included herein is a 2013 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures through the month of April. I anticipate we will have an update to this report that runs through May 2013 by approximately mid -June. 2012 Yearend Process The 2012 books were closed in April 2013. The general accounting work required to accomplish this included determining that revenue and expenditure activity was posted to the correct year and accounts, analyzing account balances and preparing closing entries. The annual report preparation is underway in anticipation of the annual audit which we anticipate will begin sometime approximately mid -June 2013. 2014 Budget Development Process The 2014 Budget development process is well underway and at this point we have received detailed budget requests from all departments. By the time the budget is adopted on October 22nd the Council will have had an opportunity to discuss the budget on seven occasions including three public hearings. June 18 Council budget workshop August 13 Admin report on 2014 revenues and expenditures August 27 Public hearing #1 on 2014 revenues and expenditures September 10 City Manager's presentation of preliminary 2014 Budget September 24 Public hearing #2 on 2014 Budget October 8 First reading on proposed ordinance adopting the 2014 Budget October 22 Second reading on proposed ordinance adopting the 2014 Budget MV- FS21Us9rsVncaihounIFinance Activity Reports1201312013 04.docx Page 1 2014 Property Tax Levy A significant part of the budget development process includes the annual levy of property taxes which in 2014 are expected to account for approximately 30% of recurring General Fund revenues. Council discussions specifically related to this topic will take place at the following meetings: August 27 Review of ordinances levying 2014 property taxes and confirming tax levy September 24 First reading of ordinances levying 2014 property taxes and confirming tax levy. October 8 Second reading of ordinances levying 2014 property taxes and confirming tax levy. Budget to Actual Comparison Report A report reflecting 2013 Budget to Actual Revenues and Expenditures for those funds for which a 2013 Budget was adopted is located on pages 5 through 15. Because we attempt to provide this information in a timely manner this report is prepared from records that are not formally closed by the Finance Department at month end or reconciled to bank records. Although it is realistic to expect the figures will change over subsequent weeks, I believe the report is materially accurate. We've included the following information in the report: • Revenues by source for all funds, and expenditures by department in the General Fund and by type in all other funds. • A breakdown between recurring and nonrecurring revenues and expenditures in the General Fund, Street O &M Fund and Stormwater Fund. • The change in fund balance including beginning and ending figures. The beginning fund balance figures are those that are expected to be reflected in our 2012 Annual Financial Report. • Columns of information include: o The 2013 Budget as adopted. o April 2013 activity. o Cumulative 2013 activity through April 2013. o Budget remaining in terms of dollars. o The percent of budgeted revenue collected or budgeted expenditures disbursed. A few points related to the General Fund #001 (page 5): Recurring revenues collections are currently at 19.75% of the amount budgeted with 33.3% of the year elapsed. This is typical and reflective of the nature of the timing of when revenues are collected. • Property tax collections have reached $940,144 or 8.59% of the amount budgeted. This is because property taxes are paid to Spokane County in two installments each year on April 30 and October 31. The greatest portion of these monies are then remitted to the City in May and November. • Sales tax collections represent only 3- months of collections thus far because taxes collected in April are not remitted to the City by the State until the latter part of May. Collections are currently $3,953,102 or 26.2% of the amount budgeted. • Gambling taxes are at $17,867 or 2.92% of the amount budgeted. This is because they are paid quarterly with first quarter payments due by April 30. Most of the returns were received on the final day of April and actually booked as revenue the 1st of May. • Franchise Fee and Business Registration revenues are typically received in the month following a calendar year quarter. This year however through April we have received only $34,018 or 3.00% of the amount budgeted because a number of payments were not received until early May. 11SV- FS21UserslmcalhounlFinance Activity Repotfs1201312013 04.docx Page 2 • State shared revenues are composed of State of Washington distributions that include items such as liquor board profits, liquor excise tax, streamlined sales tax mitigation and criminal justice monies. Most of these revenues are paid by the State in the month following a calendar quarter. Through April we've received remittances totaling $454,696 or 27.0% of the amount budgeted. • Service revenues are largely composed of building permit and plan review fees as well as false alarm fees and right of way permits. Revenues are currently $477,182 or 36.6% of the amount budgeted. • Fines and forfeitures revenues are composed of monthly remittances from Spokane County with payments made in the month following the actual assessment of a fine. Through April 2013 we've received remittances for the period January through March with receipts of $335,675 or 22.5% of the amount budgeted. • Recreation program fees are composed of revenues generated by the variety of parks and recreation programs including classes, swimming pools (in- season), and CenterPlace. Currently, revenues total $156,730 or 27.4% of the amount budgeted. Recurring expenditures are currently at 25.2% of the amount budgeted with 33.3% of the year elapsed. Departments experience seasonal fluctuations in activity so they don't necessarily expend their budget in twelve equal monthly installments. Investments (page 16) Investments at April 30 total $45,753,594 and are composed of $40,710,716 in the Washington State Local Government Investment Pool and $5,042,889 in bank CDs. Total Sates Tax Receipts (page 17) Total sales tax receipts reflect State remittances through April and total $4,450,890 including general, criminal justice and public safety taxes. This figure is $305,006 (7.36 %) greater than for the same 3 -month period in 2012. Economic Indicators (pages 18 — 20) The following economic indicators provide information pertaining to three different sources of tax revenue that provide a good gauge of the health and direction of the overall economy. 1. Sales taxes (page 18) provide a sense of how much individuals and businesses are spending on the purchase of goods. 2. Hotel I Motel taxes (page 19) provide us with a sense of overnight stays and visits to our area by tourists or business travelers. 3. Real Estate Excise taxes (page 20) provide us with a sense of real estate sales. Page 18 provides a 10 -year history of general sales tax receipts (not including public safety or criminal justice) with monthly detail beginning January 2004. • Compared with calendar year 2012, 2013 collections have increased by $286,093 or 7.80 %. • Tax receipts peaked in 2007 at $17.4 million and dropped off dramatically in the subsequent three years. Page 19 provides a 10 -year history of hotel/motel tax receipts with monthly detail beginning January 2004. • Compared with calendar year 2012, 2013 collections have increased by $9,253 or 13.5 %. • Collections peaked in 2007 and 2008, dropped off in 2009 (although significantly less than the drop in sales taxes) and are currently approaching the highs of 2008. Page 20 provides a 10 -year history of real estate excise tax receipts with monthly detail beginning January 2004. 11SV- FS21UsersVncalhoun1F1nance Activity Reports1201312013 04.docx Page 3 Compared with calendar year 2012, 2013 collections have increased by $110,093 or 63.2 %. Tax receipts peaked in 2007 at nearly $2.6 million, decreased precipitously in 2008 and 2009, and appear to be slowly gaining ground. Debt Cat3acity and Bonds Outstanding (page 21) This page provides information on the City's debt capacity, or the dollar amount of General Obligation (G.O.) Bonds the City may issue, as well as an amortization schedule of the bonds the City currently has outstanding. • The maximum amount of G.O. bonds the City may issue is determined by the assessed value and the 2012 assessed value for 2013 property taxes is $6,921,825,295. Following the City's December 1, 2012 bond payment, the City currently has $7,690,000 of nonvoted G.O. bonds outstanding which represents 7.41% of our nonvoted bond capacity, and 1.48% of our total debt capacity for all types of bonds. • The $7,690,000 of bonds the City currently has outstanding is part of the 2003 nonvoted (LTGO) bond issue. Of this amount: • $6,130,000 remains on bonds issued for the construction of CenterPlace. These bonds are repaid with a portion of the 1/10 of 1% sales tax that is collected by the Spokane Public Facilities District. • $1,560,000 remains on bonds issued for road and street improvements around CenterPlace. The bonds are repaid with a portion of the real estate excise tax collected by the City. 11SV- FS21UsersVncalhounlFinance Activity Reports1201312093 04.docx Page 4 P:1Finance7or City Councll%Council Monthly Reports1201312013 04 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2013 #001 - GENERAL_ FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Property Tax Sales Tax Criminal Justice Tax Public safety Sales Tax Gambling Tax and Leasehold Excise Tax Franchise Fees /Business Registration State Shared Revenues Service Revenues Fines and Forfeitures Recreation Program Fees Miscellaneous & Investment Interest Transfer -in 4101 (street admin) Transfer -in - #105 (h/m tax -CP advertising) Transfer -in - #402 (storm admin) Total Recurring Revenues Expenditures City Council City Manager Legal Public Safety Deputy City Manager Finance Human Resources Public Works Community Development - Administration Community Development - Engineering Community Development - Planning Community Development - Building Parks & Rec- Administration Parks & Rec - Maintenance Parks & Rec - Recreatlon Parks & Rec - Aquatics Parks & Rec - Senior Center Parks & Rec - CenterPlace Pavement Preservation General Government Transfers out - #502 (insurance premium) Total Recurring Expenditures Recurring Revenues Over (Under) Recurring Expenditures NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues nia Total Nonrecurring Revenues Expenditures Transfers out - #309 (park grant match) Transfers out - #311 (100 %> $26million) Transfers out - #312 (Capital Reserve Fund) Total Nonrecurring Expenditures Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures Budget Year Elapsed = 33.3% 2013 Actual Actual thru Budget % of Budget April Apr. 30 Remaining Budget 10,943,700 747,047 940,144 (10,003,556) 8.59% 15,100,000 1,148,486 3,953,102 (11,146,898) 26.18% 1,280,000 94,503 318,384 (961,616) 24,87% 750,000 52,178 179,405 (570,595) 23.92% 612,300 13,974 17,867 (594,433) 2.92% 1,135,000 8,382 34,018 (1,100,982) 3,00% 1,684,600 111,636 454,696 (1,229,904) 26.99% 1,304,000 116,303 477,182 (826,818) 36.59% 1,494,300 123,813 335,675 (1,158,625) 22.46% 571,500 42,376 156,730 (414,770) 27,42% 166,200 19,718 52,849 (113,351) 31.80% 39,700 3,308 13,233 (26,467) 33.33% 30,000 0 0 (30,000) 0.00% 13,400 1,117 4,467 (8,933) 33.33% 35,124,700 2,482,841 6,937,752 (28,186,948) 19.75% 390,111 28,369 150,731 239,380 38.64% 633,974 48,539 195,542 438,432 30.84% 413,181 32,536 133,984 279,197 32,43% 22,139,200 391,669 5,437,348 16,701,852 24.56% 609,706 33,857 144,214 465,492 23.65% 1,089,633 66,735 335,092 754,541 30.75% 228,041 17,520 68,631 159,410 30.10% 876,443 54,889 215,087 661,356 24.54% 257,175 18,150 82,827 174,348 32.21% 850,845 77,700 275,691 575,154 32.40% 869,743 97,834 317,712 552,031 36.53% 1,162,582 85,407 350,166 812,416 30.12% 270,717 21,867 101,974 168,743 37.67% 789,000 61,806 186,450 602,550 23.63% 224,999 10,606 43,360 181,639 19.27% 485,600 3,811 14,978 470,622 3.08% 88,143 6,569 25,738 62,405 29.20% 795,884 62,832 208,359 588,525 26.15% 855,857 0 0 855,857 0.00% 1,740,700 126,741 457,438 1,283,262 26.28% 319,000 26,583 106,333 212,667 33,33% 35,091,534 1,294,021 8,851,654 26,239,880 25.22% 33,166 1,188,820 (1,913,902) (1,947,068) 0 0 0 0 #DIV /O! 0 0 0 0 #❑IV101 50,000 4,167 16,667 33,333 33.33% 0 0 0 0 #DIV101 7,826,207 0 7,826,207 0 100.00% 7,876,207 4,167 7,842,874 33,333 99.58% (7,876,207) (4,167) (7,842,87L 33,333 Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues Over (Under) Total Expenditures (7,843,041) 1,184,653 (9,756,776) (1,913,735) Beginning fund balance 28,681,219 28,681,219 Ending fund balance 20,838,178 18,924,443 Page 5 P:IFinancelFor City CouncillCouncil Monthly Reports1201 31201 3 04 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2013 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS #101 - STREET FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Motor Vehicle Fuel (Gas) Tax Investment Interest Insurance Premiums & Recoveries Utility Tax Miscellaneous Revenue Total Recurring Revenues Expenditures Wages 1 Benefits I Payroll Taxes Supplies Services & Charges Intergovernmental Payments Interfund Transfers -out - #001 InterfundTransfers - out - #501 (plowraplace.) Interfund Transfers -out - #501 (non -plow vehicle Total Recurring Expenditures Recurring Revenues Over (Under) Recurring Expenditures NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Grants Interf und Transfers in - #302 Miscellaneous Total Nonrecurring Revenues Expenditures Interfund Transfers- out - #311 (pavement preserve Interfund Transfers -out - #303 (Evergree Recon, 0133 - Sprague /Sullivan ITS Capital Outlay - Buildings & Structures Total Nonrecurring Expenditures Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues Over (Under) Total Expenditures Beginning fund balance Ending fund balance Budget Year Elapsed = 2013 Actual Actual thru Budget % of Budget April Apr. 30 Remaining Budget 1,861,100 135,695 427,839 (1,433,261) 22.99% 5,000 268 779 (4,221) 15.57% 0 0 633 633 #DIVI01 2,900,000 223,884 657,914 (2,242,086) 22.69% 0 0 0 0 #DIV101 4,766,100 359,847 1,087,164 (3,678,936) 22.81% 573,170 47,149 231,420 341,750 40.38% 72,200 15,375 141,009 (68,809) 195.30% 2,925,152 190,516 392,886 2,532,266 13.43% 851,000 64,259 129,462 721,538 15.21% 39,700 3,308 13,233 26,467 33.33% 150,000 12,500 56,000 100,000 3133% 10,777 898 3,592 7,185 33.33% 4,621,999 334,005 961,603 3,660,396 20.80% 144,101 25,842 125,561 (18,540)_ 0 1,132 1,612 1,612 #DIV101 0 0 75 75 #DIVIO! 0 4,195 11,516 11,516 #DIVIO! 0 5,327 13,203 13,203 #DIVI01 282,000 0 282,000 0 100.00% 0 0 138 (138) #DIV101 0 36,640 40,195 (40,195) #DIUI01 0 0 0 0 #DIVIO! 282,000 36.640 322,333 (40,333) 114.30% (282,000) 31,3`1 (309,130) (27,130) (137,899) (5,470) (183,569) (45,670) 2,228,437 2,228,437 2,090,538 2,044,868 Page 6 P:IFinance\For City Counc!ilCouncil Monthly Reports1201312013 04 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2013 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS - continued #103 - PATHS & TRAILS Revenues Motor Vehicle Fuel (Gas) Tax Investment Interest Total revenues Expenditures Miscellaneous Capital Outlay Budget Year Elapsed = 2013 Actual Actual thru Budget % of Budget Aril Apr. 30 Remainin Budget 7,800 0 0 (7,800) 0.00% 0 5 14 14 #DIVIO! 7,800 5 14 (7,786) 0.18% #DIVIO! #DIV101 Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 #DIV /01 Revenues over (under) expenditures 7,800 5 14 (7,786) Beginning fund balance 63,941 63,941 Ending fund balance 71,741 63,955 #105 - HOTEL f MOTEL TAX FUND Revenues Hotel/Motel Tax Investment Interest Total revenues Expenditures Interfund Transfers - #001 City directed marketing efforts Tourism Promotion Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning fund balance Ending fund balance 460,000 27,739 77,898 (382,102) 16,93% 500 26 85 (415) 17.07% 460,500 27,765 77,984 (382,516) 16.93% 30,000 0 0 30,000 0.00% 50,000 0 0 380,500 51,174 76,817 303,683 20.19% 460,500 51,174 76,817 333,683 16.68% 0 (23,409) 1,167 (716,199) 206,772 206,772 206,772 207,939 Page 7 PAFinance\For City Council\Council Monthly Reports1201312013 04 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2013 Budget Year Elapsed = 33.3% 2013 Actual Actual thru Budget % of Budget April Apr. 30 Remaining Budget SPECIAL. REVENUE FUNDS - continued 9120 - CENTER PLACE OPERATING RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 500 0 0 (500) 0.00% Interfund Transfer 0 0 0 0 #DIVI01 Total revenues 500 0 0 (500) 0.00% Expenditures Operations 0 0 0 0 #DIV101 Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 #DIV /01 Revenues over (under) expenditures 500 0 0 (500) Beginning fund balance 350,787 350,787 Ending fund balance 351,287 350,787 #121 - SERVICE LEVEL STABILIZATION RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 7,000 650 1,937 (5,063) 27.67% Interfund Transfer 0 0 0 0 #DIV /01 Total revenues 7,000 650 1,937 5,063) 27.67% Expenditures Operations 0 0 0 0 #DIVI01 Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 #DIV /O! Revenues over (under) expenditures 7,000 650 1,937 (5,063) 100.00% Beginning fund balance 5,441,531 150 5,441,531 (1,153) Ending fund balance 5,448,531 5,443,468 #122 - WINTER WEATHER RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 700 63 188 (512) 28.84% Interfund Transfer 0 0 0 0 #DIV /0! Subtotal revenues 700 63 188 (512) 26.84% Expenditures Reserve for Winter Weather 0 0 0 0 #DIV /O! Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 #DIV /01 Revenues over (under) expenditures 700 63 188 (512) 100.00% Beginning fund balance 502,888 150 502,888 (1,153) Ending fund balance 503,588 503,075 #123 - CIVIC FACILITIES REPLACEMENT FUND Revenues Investment Interest 1,600 150 447 (1,153) 27.91% Interfund Transfer- #001 0 0 0 0 #DIV /01 Total revenues 1,600 150 447 (1,153) 27.91% Expenditures Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 #DIV /O! Transfers out -#311 (pavement preservation) 616,284 0 616,284 0 100.00% Total expenditures 616,284 0 616,284 0 100.00% Revenues over (under) expenditures (614,684) 150 (615,837) (1,153) Beginning fund balance 2,403,947 2,403,947 Ending fund balance 1,789,283 1,788,110 Page 8 P:1FinancelFor City CouncillCouncil Monthly Reports1201312013 04 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 437,120 0 Budget Year Elapsed 333% Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures 185,903 0 (15,231) 201,134 -8.19% For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2013 623,023 0 (51,542) 674,565 -8.27% Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 15,492 113,509 2013 Beginning fund balance 0 0 Actual Actual thru Budget % of 113,509 Budget April Apr. 30 Remaining Budget DEBT SERVICE FUNDS #204 - DEBT SERVICE FUND Revenues Spokane Public Facilities District 437,120 0 0 (437,120) 0.00% Interfund Transfer -in - #301 92,951 7,746 30,984 (61,967) 3133% Inlerfund Transfer-in - #302 92,952 7,746 30,984 (61,966) 33.33% Total revenues 623,023 15,492 61,968 (561,055) 9.95% Expenditures Debt Service Payments - CenterPlace 437,120 0 (36,311) 473,431 -8.31% Debt Service Payments - Roads 185,903 0 (15,231) 201,134 -8.19% Total expenditures 623,023 0 (51,542) 674,565 -8.27% Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 15,492 113,509 (1,235,620) Beginning fund balance 0 0 Ending fund balance 0 113,509 Page 9 P:TinancelFor City CouncillCouncil Monthly Reporls12013=13 04 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2013 Budget Year Elapsed = 33.3 2013 Actual Actual thru Budget % of Budget April Apr. 30 Remaining Budget CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS #301 - CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues REET 1 -Taxes 500,000 36,086 176,329 (323,671) 35.27% Investment Interest 500 106 308 (192) 61.60% Interfund Transfer -In - #303 0 0 0 0 #DIVIOI Total revenues 500,500 36,192 176,637 323,863 35.29% Expenditures 1,000 126 375 (625) 37.48% Interfund Transfer -out- #204 92,951 7,746 30,984 61,967 33.33% Interfund Transfer- out - #303 742,404 0 855 741,549 0.12% Interfund Transfer- out - #311 (pavementpresen 150,000 0 150,000 0 100.00% Total expenditures 985,355 7,746 181,839 803,516 18.45% Revenues over (under) expenditures (484,855) 28,446 (5,202) (1,127,379) 33.33% Beginning fund balance 1,092,264 0 1,092,264 641,418 -3,88% Ending fund balance 607,409 0 1,087,062 0 100.00% #302 SPECIAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues REST 2 - Taxes 500,000 36,086 107,967 (392,033) 21.59% Investment Interest 1,000 126 375 (625) 37.48% Interfund Transfer -in - #307 0 0 0 0 #DIVl01 Total revenues 501,000 36,212 108,342 (392,658) 21.63% Expenditures Interfund Transfer- out - #101 0 0 75 (75) #DIV /01 lnterfund Transfer-out - #204 92,952 7,746 30,984 61,968 33.33% Interfund Transfer-out - #303 617,479 0 (23,939) 641,418 -3,88% Interfund Transfer- out - 9311 (pavement presen 150,000 0 150,000 0 100.00% Total expenditures 860,431 7,746 157,120 703,311 18.26% Revenues over (under) expenditures (359,431) 28,466 (48,778) (1,095,969) Beginning fund balance 1,130,670 1,130,670 Ending fund balance 771,239 1,081,892 Page 10 P:IF!nancelFor City CouncillCouncil Monthly Repo rts1201 31201 3 04 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2013 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS - continued #303 STREET CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds Developer Contribution Miscellaneous Interfund Transfer -in - #101 Interfund Transfer -in - #301 Interfund Transfer -in - #302 Investment Interest Total revenues Expenditures 005 Pines / Mansfield, Wilbur Rd. to Pines 060 Argonne Rd Corridor Upgrade SRTC 06 -31 061 Pines (SR27) ITS Imporvement SRTC 06 -26 063 Broadway Ave Safety Project - Pines 065 SpraguelSullivan 069 Park Road Reconstruction #2 106 West Ponderosa STEP 112 Indiana Avenue Extension 113 Indiana/Sullivan PCC Intersection 115 Sprague Ave Resurfacing - Evergreen to Sullivan 123 Mission Ave -Flora to Barker 141 Sullivan & Euclid PCC 142 Broadway @ Argonne /Mullan 145 Spokane Valley - Millwood Trail 146 24th Ave Sidewalk - Adams to Sullivan 148 Greenacres Trail - Design 149 Sidewalk Infill 151 Green Haven STEP 154 Sidewalk & Tansit Stop Accessibility 155 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement 156 Mansfield Ave. Connection 157 Temporary Sullivan Bridge Repairs 159 University Rd 11-90 Overpass Study 160 Evergreen Rd Pres. 16th -32nd 166 Pines Rd. (SR27) & Grace Ave. InI. Safety 167 Citywide Safety Improvements 168 Wellesley Ave Sidewalk & Adams Rd Sidewalk 169 ArgonnelMullan Safety Indiana - Broadway 170 Argonne road: Empire Ave - Knox Ave. 171 Sprague Ave ADA Curb Ramp Project 175 Sullivan UP Tracks UC (SB) Resurfacing 176 Appleway Trail 177 Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study 181 Citywide Traffic Sign Upgrade Contingency Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning fund balance Ending fund balance Budget Year Elapsed = 300,000 201,877 2013 96,898 67.70% 957,892 Actual Actual thru Budget % of Budget April Apr. 30 Remaining Budget 6,597,842 155,827 178,083 (6,419,759) 2.70% 0 0 0 0 #DIV101 0 0 50 50 #DIVIO! 0 0 138 138 #DIVIO! 742,404 0 855 (741,549) 0.12% 617,479 0 (23,939) (641,418) -3.88% 0 3 6 6 #DIVIO! 7,957,725 155,830 155,194 (7,802,531) 1.95% 300,000 201,877 203,102 96,898 67.70% 957,892 732 3,936 953,956 0.41% 637,288 3,920 11,050 626,238 1.73% 0 0 0 0 #DIVIO! 0 0 0 0 #DIV /01 0 0 0 0 #DIV101 0 39 138 (138) #DIV10! 0 0 0 0 #DIV101 0 0 0 0 #DIV101 188,745 118 10,487 178,258 5.56% 0 0 0 0 #DIVro? 139,332 0 0 139,332 0.00% 219,599 3,196 4,582 215,017 2.09% 200,000 115 245 199,755 0.12% 15,000 10,142 10,972 4,028 73.15% 0 0 0 0 #DIV101 337,507 6,091 7,335 330,172 2.17% 0 0 0 0 #DIVIO! 33,198 0 0 33,198 0.00% 800,000 1,244 4,967 795,033 0.62% 1,012,924 8,350 43,118 969,806 4,26% 0 0 16 (16) #DIVIO! 125,000 20,698 30,809 94,191 24.65% 0 0 138 (138) #DIVIO! 98,100 10,399 12,161 85,939 12.40% 450,995 667 1,449 449,546 0.32% 554,500 24,720 50,943 503,557 9.19% 104,460 439 667 103,793 0.64% 172,785 695 912 171,873 0.53% 110,400 5,603 14,580 95,820 13.21% 0 3,153 3,980 (3,980) #DIVIOI 0 13 1,373 (1,373) #REF! 0 752 2,250 (2,250) #REF! 0 0 0 0 #DIV/OI 1,500,000 0 0 1,500,000 0,00% 7,957,725 302,962 419,211 7,538,514 5.27% 0 (147,132) (264,017) (15,341,045) 73,646 73,646 73,646 (190,371) Page 11 P:1FinanceT -or City CouncillCouncil Monthly Reports1201 31201 3 04 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2013 Budget Year Elapsed = 2013 Actual Actual thru Budget % of Budget April Apr, 30 Remaining Budget CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS - continued 50,000 0 0 50,000 0,00% #309 - PARKS CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 50,000 0 0 50,000 0.00% Revenues 0 4,228 16,850 (83,150) 100.00% Grant Proceeds 0 0 0 0 #DIV /O! Interfund Transfer -in - #001 50,000 4,167 16,667 (33,333) 33.33% Interfund Transfer -in - #304 0 0 0 0 #DIV /01 Investment Interest 0 62 183 183 #DIVIO! Total revenues 50,000 4,228 16,850 (33,150) 33.70% Expenditures Capital 50,000 0 0 50,000 0,00% Total expenditures 50,000 0 0 50,000 0.00% Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 4,228 16,850 (83,150) 100.00% Beginning fund balance 302,423 0 302,423 0 100,00% Ending fund balance 302,423 0 319,273 0 100.00% 9310 - CIVIC FACILITIES CAPITAL. PROJECTS FUND 0 256 764 764 #DIVI01 Revenues 1,198,284 256 1,199,048 764 100.06% Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 #DIV /O! Investment Interest 0 165 492 492 #DIVIO! Total revenues 0 165 492 492 #DIVIO! Expenditures 0 14,032 24,692 (24,692) #DIV /01 Capital 0 0 0 0 #DIVI01 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 #DIVIO! Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 #DIV /0! Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 165 492 492 Beginning fund balance 1,110,074 1,110,074 Ending fund balance 1,110,074 1,110,566 #311 - PAVEMENT PRESERVATION FUND Revenues Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 #DIV /O! Interfund Transfers in - #101 282,000 0 282,000 0 100.00% Interfund Transfers in - #123 616,284 0 616,284 0 100.00% Interfund Transfers in- #301 150,000 0 150,000 0 100,00% Interfund Transfers in - #302 150,000 0 150,000 0 100.00% Investment Interest 0 256 764 764 #DIVI01 Total revenues 1,198,284 256 1,199,048 764 100.06% Expenditures 162 2012 Street Preservation 0 723 1,364 (1,364) #DIVIO! 174 2013 Street Preservation Phi 0 19,401 40,689 (40,689) #DIVIO! 179 2013 Street Preservation Ph2 0 14,032 24,692 (24,692) #DIV /01 180 2013 Street Preservation Ph3 0 165 165 (165) #DIV101 Pavement Preservation 1,198,284 0 0 1,198,284 100.00% Total expenditures 1 „198,284 34,322 66,910 1,131,374 5.58% Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 (34,065) 1,132,138 (1,130,610) Beginning fund balance 948,733 948,733 Ending fund balance 948,733 2,080,871 #312 - CAPITAL RESERVE FUND Revenues Transfers in- #001 7,826,207 0 7,826,207 0 100,00% Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 #DIVIO! Total revenues 7,826,207 0 7,826,207 0 100.00% Expenditures Capital Outlays 0 0 0 0 #DIVIO! Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 #D1V101 Revenues over (under) expenditures 7,826,207 0 7,826,207 0 Beginning fund balance 0 0 Ending fund balance 7,826,207 7,826,207 Page 12 P:1F!nanceTor City CounciINCouncil Monthly Reports12013\2013 04 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2013 ENTERPRISE FUNDS #402 - STORMWATER FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Stormwater Management Fees Investment Interest Miscellaneous Total Recurring Revenues Expenditures Wages / Benefits / Payroll Taxes Supplies Services & Charges Intergovernmental Payments Inter-fund Transfers -out - #001 Interfund Transfers -out - #502 Total Recurring Expenditures Recurring Revenues Over (Under) Recurring Expenditures NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Grant Proceeds Interfund Transfers -in Total Nonrecurring Revenues Expenditures Capital - various protects Sullivan Bridge Drain Retrofit Total Nonrecurring Expenditures Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures Budget Year Elapsed = 33.3% 2013 Actual Actual thru Budget % of Budget April Apr. 30 Remaining Budget 1,800,000 122,025 153,134 (1,646,866) 8.51% 1,800 186 553 (1,247) 30.75% 0 0 0 0 4DIV10! 1,801,800 122,211 153,687 (1,648,113) 8.53% 475,604 33,860 131,733 343,871 27.70% 16,300 760 1,137 15,163 6.97% 1,131,120 105,040 190,380 940,740 16,83% 23,000 0 12,500 10,501 54.35% 13,400 1,117 4,467 8,933 33.33% 1,567 131 522 1,045 33.33% 1,660,991 140,906 340,738 1,320,253 20.51% 140,809 (18,695) (187,051) (327,860) 200,000 1,482 11,073 (188,927) 5.54% 0 0 0 0 #DIV /O! 200,000 1,482 11,073 (188,927) 5.54% 150,000 0 0 150,000 0.00% 267,000 578 2,554 264,446 0.96% 417,000 578 2,554 414,446 0.61% (217,000) 905 8,519 225,519 Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues Over (Under) Total Expenditures (76,191) (17,791) (178,532) (102,341) Beginning working capital 2,697,333 2,697,333 Ending working capital 2,621,142 2,518,801 Page 13 P:TinancelFor City CouncitlCouncil Monthly Reports12O1312013 0430 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget Year Elapsed = 33.3% Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2013 2013 Actual Actual thru Budget % of Budget April Apr, 30 Remaining Budget ENTERPRISE FUNDS -continued #403 - AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA Revenues Spokane County 500,000 0 0 (500,000) 0.00% Grant - Sprague Swales 0 0 570,332 570,332 #DIVIO! Grant - Decant Facility 0 0 0 0 #DIVIOI Investment Interest 1,000 0 0 (1,000) 0.00% Total revenues 501,000 0 570,332 69,332 113.84% Expenditures Sprague swales 0 100 100 (100) #DIVIO! Capital - various 90,000 0 0 90,000 0.00% 14th Ave Custer to Carnahan 200,000 0 0 200,000 0.00% Bettman- Rickey Storm drain 210,000 0 0 210,000 0.00% Decant Facility 0 0 0 0 #DIVI0l Total expenditures 500,000 100 100 499,900 0.02% Revenues over (under) expenditures 1,000 (100) 570,232 (430,589) Beginning working capital (108,658) (108,658) Ending working capital (107,658) 461,574 Page 14 P;Tlnance\For City Council\Council Monthly Reports= 3\2013 04 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2013 Budget Year Elapsed = 33.3% Expenditures Computer replacement lease 0 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Software /Hardware replacement Budget April Apr. 30 Remaining Budget INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS 50,000 48,749 48,749 1,251 97.50% #501 - ER &R FUND 0 0 0 0 #DIV10! Revenues 0 0 0 0 #DIV101 Interfund Transfer -in - #001 15,400 1,283 5,133 (10,267) 33.33% Interfund Transfer -in - #101 10,777 898 3,592 (7,185) 33.33% Interfund Transfer -in - #101 (plow replace.) 150,000 12,500 50,000 (100,000) 3133% Interfund Transfer -in - #402 1,567 131 522 (1,045) 33.33% Investment Interest 1,000 110 327 (673) 32.67% Total revenues 178,744 14,922 59,575 119,169) 33.33% Expenditures Computer replacement lease 0 0 0 0 #DIVIOI Software /Hardware replacement 0 0 0 0 #DIV101 Vehicle Replacement 50,000 48,749 48,749 1,251 97.50% Snow Plow Replacement 0 0 0 0 #DIV10! Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 #DIV101 Total expenditures 50,000 48,749 48,749 1,251 97.50% Revenues over (under) expenditures 128,744 (33,828) 10,825 (120,420) Beginning working capital 1,053,177 1,053,177 Ending working capital 1,181,921 1,064,002 #502 - RISK MANAGEMENT FUND Revenues Investment Interest 0 i 2 2 #DIV /O! Interfund Transfer- #001 319,000 26,583 106,333 (212,667) 33.33% Total revenues 319,000 26,564 106,335 (212,665) 33.33% Expenditures Services & Charges 319,000 3,184 267,106 51,894 83.73% Total expenditures 319,000 3,184 267,106 51,894 83.73% Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 23,400 (160,771) (264,559) Beginning working capital 83,212 83,212 Ending working capital 83,212 (77,559) Page 15 P:1Finance\For City Council\Council Monthly Reports1201 31201 3 04 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Investment Report For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2013 5/14/2013 Beginning $ 42,126,084.39 $ 3,041,436.56 $ Total $ 47,168,973.04 LGIP* BB CD 2 BB CD 3 Investments Beginning $ 42,126,084.39 $ 3,041,436.56 $ 2,001,452.09 $ 47,168,973.04 Deposits 1,578,885.97 0.00 0.00 1,578,885.97 Withdrawls (3,000,000.00) 0.00 0.00 (3,000,000.00) Interest 5,735.78 0.00 0.00 5,735.78 Ending $ 40,710,706.14 $ 3,C41,436.56 $ 2,001,452.09 $ 45,753,594.79 121 Service Level Stabilization Reserve matures: 612812013 991412093 7,000.00 122 Winter Weather Reserve rate: 0.65% 0.29% 700.00 001 General Fund Balance Earnings Bud et I Current Period I Year to date 001 General Fund $ 28,070,369.42 $ 3,560.69 $ 12,405,92 $ 90,000.00 101 Street Fund 2,138,762.88 268.12 778.58 5,000.00 103 Trails & Paths 37,931.08 4.76 14.18 0.00 105 Hotel /Motel 206,332.86 25.87 85.33 500.00 120 CenterPlace Operating Reserve 332,958.41 0.00 0.00 500.00 121 Service Level Stabilization Reserve 5,184,679.69 649.96 1,936.77 7,000.00 122 Winter Weather Reserve 502,906.12 6105 187.87 700.00 123 Civic Facilities Replacement 1,195,476.81 149.87 446.58 1,600.00 301 Capital Projects 843,404.73 105.73 308.00 500.00 302 Special Capital Projects 1,003,299.93 125.78 374.80 1,000.00 303 Street Capital Projects Fund 22,821.38 2.86 5.93 0.00 304 Mirabeau Point Project 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 307 Capital Grants Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 309 Parks Capital Project 490,561.51 61.50 183.26 0.00 310 Civic Buildings Capital Projects 1,316,848.73 165.08 491.92 0.00 311 Street Capital Improvements 2011+ 2,045,966.92 256.49 764.29 0.00 312 Capital Reserve Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 402 Stormwater Management 1,481,601.27 185.74 553.47 1,800.00 403 Aquifer Protection Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 501 Equipment Rental & Replacement 874,578.54 109.64 326.71 1,000.00 502 Risk Management 5,094.51 0.64 1.91 0.00 $ 45,753,594.79 $ 5,735.78 $ 18,865.52 $ 110,600.00 *Local Government Investment Pool Page 16 P:1Finance\For City CouncillCouncil Monthly Reports120131201 3 04 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 1 5/14/2013 Sales Tax Receipts For the Three -Month Period Ended March 31, 2013 Month Received 2012 February 1,792,084.16 March 1,145,747.45 April 1,208,053.80 6.50% 4,145, 885.41 May 1,440,245.01 June 1,325,266.87 July 1, 458, 841.23 August 1,482,908.83 September 1,470,215.17 October 1,558,848.71 November 1,541,210.69 December 1,523,377.53 January 1,490,932.65 0.10% * 17,437,732.10 Difference 2013 $ % 1,876,298.24 84,214.08 4.74% 1,279,426.01 133,678.56 11,67% 1,295,166.24 87,112.44 7.21% 4,450,890.49 305,005.08 7.36% 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 4,450,890.49 Sales tax receipts reported here reflect remittances for general sales tax, criminal justice sales tax and public safety tax. The sales tax rate for retail sales transacted within the boundaries of the City of Spokane Valley is 8.7 %. The tax that is paid by a purchaser at the point of sale is remitted by the vendor to the Washington State Department of Revenue who then remits the taxes back to the various agencies that have imposed the tax. The allocation of the total 8.7% tax rate to the agencies is as follows: - State of Washington 6.50% - City of Spokane Valley 0.85% - Spokane County 0.15% - Spokane Public Facilities District 0.10% - Crminlal Justice 0.10% - Public Safety 0.10% " 2.20% local tax - Juvenile Jail 0.10% * - Mental Health 0.10% * - Law Enforcement Communications 0.10% * - Spokane Transit Authority 0.60% * 8.70% * Indicates voter approved sales faxes In addition to the .85% reported above that the City receives, we also receive a portion of the Criminal Justice and Public Safety sales taxes. The distribution of those taxes is computed as follows: Criminal Justice: The tax is assessed county -wide and of the total collected, the State distributes 10% of the receipts to Spokane County, with the remainder allocated on a per capita basis to the County and the cities within the County. Public Safety: The tax is assessed county -wide and of the total collected, the State distributes 60% of the receipts to Spokane County, with the remainder allocated on a per capita basis to the cities within the County. Page 17 I1SV- FS21Userslmcalhoun\Tax Revenue\Sales Tax1201312013 sales tax collections CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Sales Tax Collections - March =: For the years 2004 through 2013 Total actual collections as a % of total budget 123.29% 122.50% 103.43% 99.83% 94.42% 79-78% 97.83% 104.51% 108.57% n/a % change in annual total collected 71.77% 10.93% 10.02% 5.36% 7.32 %) 11.84°/x) 1.06 %) 5.34% 3,89% n/a % of budget collected through March 27.43% 26.88% 23.21% 23.54% 23.83% 20.45% 24.10% 24.39% 25.81% 26.18% % of actual total collected through March 22.25% 21.94% 22.44% 23.588% 25.24% 25.63% 24.64% 23.34% 23.77% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of March 5/13/2013 2013 to 2012 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 January 1,145,888 1,367, 929 1,572,609 1,759,531 1,729,680 1,484, 350 1,491,059 1,460,548 1,589,887 1,671,269 February 962,431 917,747 1,068,743 1,155,947 1,129,765 1,098,575 963,749 990,157 1,009,389 1,133,347 March 909,472 1,015,573 1,072,330 1,196,575 1,219,611 1,068, 811 1,018,468 1,015,762 1,067,733 1,148,486 Collected to date 3,017,791 3,301,249 3,713,682 4,112,053 4,079,056 3,651,736 3,473,276 3,466,467 3,667,009 3,953,102 April 1,080,745 1,322,070 1,371,030 1,479,603 1,423,459 1,134, 552 1,184,137 1,284,180 1,277,621 0 May 1,263,176 1,159,647 1,392,111 1,353,013 1,243,259 1,098,054 1,102,523 1,187,737 1,174,962 0 June 1,123,171 1,212,663 1,362,737 1,428,868 1,386,908 1,151,772 1,123,907 1,248,218 1,290,976 0 July 1,301,359 1,377,753 1,555,124 1,579,586 1,519,846 1,309,401 1,260,873 1,332,834 1,302,706 0 August 1,162,356 1,395,952 1,405,983 1,516,324 1,377,943 1,212,531 1,211,450 1,279,500 1,299,678 0 September 1,160,787 1,372,081 1,487,155 1,546,705 1,364,963 1,227,813 1,191,558 1,294,403 1,383,123 0 October 1,274,680 1,520,176 1,526,910 1,601,038 1,344,217 1,236,493 1,269,505 1,291,217 1,358,533 0 November 1,091,721 1,095,566 1,369,940 1,443,843 1,292,327 1,155,647 1,139,058 1,217,933 1,349,580 0 December 1,085,827 1,286,191 1,366,281 1,376,434 1,129,050 1,070,245 1,141,012 1,247,920 1,323,189 0 Total Collections 13,561,613 15,043,348 16,550,953 17,437,467 16,161,028 14,248,244 14,097,299 14,850,409 15,427,377 3,953,102 Budget Estimate 11,000,000 12,280,000 16,002,000 17,466,800 17,115,800 17,860,000 14,410,000 14,210,000 14,210,000 15,100,000 Actual over (under) budg 2,561,613 2,763,348 548,953 (29,333) (954,772) (3,611,756) (312,701) 640,409 1,217,377 (11,146,898) Total actual collections as a % of total budget 123.29% 122.50% 103.43% 99.83% 94.42% 79-78% 97.83% 104.51% 108.57% n/a % change in annual total collected 71.77% 10.93% 10.02% 5.36% 7.32 %) 11.84°/x) 1.06 %) 5.34% 3,89% n/a % of budget collected through March 27.43% 26.88% 23.21% 23.54% 23.83% 20.45% 24.10% 24.39% 25.81% 26.18% % of actual total collected through March 22.25% 21.94% 22.44% 23.588% 25.24% 25.63% 24.64% 23.34% 23.77% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of March 5/13/2013 2013 to 2012 Difference 4,000,000 81,382 5.12% 123,958 12.28% 80,753 7.56% 286,093 7.80% PageZ6 116 4,500,000 4,000,000 3,500,000 - 8,000,000 2,500,000 ' March ■ February 2,000,000 1,500,000 a ]anuary 1,000,000 500,000 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 PageZ6 116 IISV- FS21UserslmcalhounlTax RevenuelLodging Tax12 0 1 311 0 5 hotel motel tax 2013 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 80,000.00 HotellMotel Tax Receipts through - March 70,000.00 _ 60,000.00 ti Actual for the years 2004 through 2013 60, x March 40,000.00 ■ February 2004 2005 2006 2007 1 2008 1 2009 1 2010 2011 2012 2013 January 16,993.58 20,691.03 20,653.49 25,137.92 28,946.96 23,280.21 22,706.96 22,212.21 21,442.32 24,184 -84 February 18,161.04 19,976.81 20,946.09 25,310.66 24,623.06 23,283 -95 23,416.94 22,792.14 21,548.82 25,974.98 March 18,182.01 22,828.15 24,308.48 29,190.35 27,509.99 25,272.02 24,232.35 24,611.28 25,654.64 27,738.65 Total Collections 53,336.63 63,495.99 65,908.06 79,638.93 81,080.01 71,836.18 70,356.25 69,615.63 68,645 -78 77,898-47 April 26,897.82 29,748.41 34,371.82 37,950.53 40,406.02 36,253.63 39,463.49 38,230.49 52,130.37 0.00 May 16,440.37 29,017.66 32,522.06 31,371,01 36,828.53 32,588.80 34,683.32 33,790.69 37,478.44 0.00 June 53,284.01 35,330.35 34,256.71 36,267.07 46,659.88 40,414 -59 39,935.36 41,403.41 43,970.70 0.00 July 42,120.26 43,841.82 49,744.62 56,281.99 50,421.37 43,950.26 47,385.18 49,311.97 52,818.60 0.00 August 43,649.84 46,852.10 45,916.16 51,120.70 50,818.35 50,146.56 54,922.99 57,451 -68 57,229 -23 0,00 September 39,390 -66 46,746.18 50,126.53 57,260.34 60,711_89 50,817.62 59,418.96 58,908.16 64,298.70 0.00 October 33,004.62 34,96635 38,674.17 43,969.74 38,290.46 36,784 -36 41,272.35 39,028.08 43,698.90 0.00 November 32,176.61 26,089.36 36.417.11 36,340.64 35,582.59 34,054 -79 34,329.78 37,339.36 39,301.22 0.00 December 23,142.70 31,740.18 29,147.15 31,377.41 26,290.11 27.131.43 26.776.84 32,523 -19 30,432.13 0.00 Total Collections 363,443.52 387,828.90 417,084.39 461,578.36 467,089.21 423,978.22 448,544.52 457,602.66 490,004.07 77,898.47 Budget Estimate 380,000.00 436,827.00 350,000.00 400,000.00 400,000.00 512,000.00 380,000.00 480,000.00 430,000.00 460,000.00 Actual over (under) budg (16,556.48) (48,998.10) 67,084.39 61,578.36 67,089.21 (88.021.78) 68,544.52 (22,397.34) 60;004.07 (382,101.53) Total actual collections as a % of total budget 95.64% 88.78% 119.17% 115.39% 116.77% 82.81% 118.04% 95.33% 113.95% "la % change in annual total collected 41.34% 6.71% 7.54% 10.67% 1 -19% (9.23 %) 5.79% 2.02% 7.08% nla % of budget collected through March 14.04% 14.54% 18.83% 19.91% 20.27% 14.03% 18.51% 14.50% 15.96% 16.93% % of actual total collected through March 14.68% 16.37% 15.80% 17.25% 17.36% 16.94% 15.69% 15.21% 14.01% nla Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of March 90,000.00 80,000.00 70,000.00 _ 60,000.00 ti 50,000.00 x March 40,000.00 ■ February 30,000.00 a January 20,000.00 10,000.00 0.00 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 5/13/2013 2013 to 2012 QQ. Difference Y % 2,743 12.79% 4,426 20.54% 2,084 8.12% 9,253 13.48% 2003 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,527.32 32,512.11 38,580.48 54,974.74 30,718.23 36,960.11 23.044.56 28.825.30 257,142.85 419,000.00 (161,857 -15} 61.37% n/a 0.00% 0.00% Page.af jq I1SV- FS21Userslmcalhoun%Tax RevenuelREET120131301 and 302 REST for 2013 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 1st and 2nd 114% REST Collections through March Actual for the years 2004 through 2413 Total actual collections 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 January 119,387.05 147,819.56 243,894.16 228,896.76 145,963.47 55,281.25 59,887.08 64,128.13 46,358.75 56,898.40 February 83,795.78 128,082.35 172,154.72 129,919.79 159,503.34 45,180.53 64,121.61 36,443.36 56,114.56 155,226.07 March 195,121.93 198,013.09 182,065.71 263,834.60 133,513.35 73,306.86 86,204.41 95,879.78 71,729.67 72,171.53 Collected to date 398,304.76 473,915.00 598,114.59 622,651.15 438,980.16 173,768.64 210,213.10 196,451.27 174,202.98 284,296.00 April 144,167.21 192,012.44 173,796.61 211,787.08 128,366.69 81,155.83 99,507.19 79,681.38 86,537.14 0.00 May 155,089.15 240,765.59 306,871.66 222,677.17 158,506.43 77,463.58 909,624.89 124,691.60 111,627.22 0.00 June 177,702.06 284,268.67 226,526.64 257,477.05 178,202.98 105,020.98 105,680.28 81,579.34 124,976.28 DAD July 197,046.43 209,350.53 2,104.30 323,945.47 217,942.98 122,530.36 84,834.48 79,629.06 101,048.69 0.00 August 171,521.07 280,881.50 451,700.06 208,039.87 133,905.93 115,829.68 72,630.27 129,472.44 106,517.19 0.00 September 176,002.43 214,738.94 188,066.23 165,287.21 131,240.36 93,862.17 75,812.10 68,019.83 63,516.73 0.00 October 199,685.81 244,590.31 211,091.20 206,442.92 355,655.60 113,960.52 93,256.02 61,396.23 238,094.79 0.00 November 217,019.02 190,964.73 141,729.09 191,805.53 147,875.00 133,264.84 72,021.24 74,752.72 104,885.99 0.00 December 173,502.55 159,381.40 161,285.23 179,567.77 96,086.00 71,365.60 38,724.50 65,077.29 74,299.65 0.00 Total distributed by Spokane County 2,010,040.49 2,490,869.11 2,461,285.61 2,589,68122 1,986,762.13 1,088,222.20 962,304.07 960,751.16 1.185,706.66 284,296.00 Budget estimate 1,680,000.00 4,006,361.00 2,000.000-00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 760,000.00 800,000.00 950,000.00 1,000,000.00 Actual over (under) budget 330,040.49 (1,515,491.89) 461,285.61 589,681.22 (13,237.87) (911,777.80) 202,304.07 160.751.16 235,706.66 (715.704.00) Total actual collections 600,000.00 500,000.00 400,000.00 March 300,000.00 8 February as a % of total budget 119.65% 62.17% 123.05% 129.48% 99.34% 54.41% 126.62% 120.09% 124.81% nla % change in annual total collected 50.25% 23.92% (1.19 %) 5.22% (23.28 %) (45.23 %) (11.57 %) 0.16 %) 23.41% nla % of budget collected through March 23.71% 11.83% 29.91% 31.13% 21.95% 8.69% 27.66% 24.56% 18,34% 28.43% % of actual total collected through March 19.82% 19.03% 24.30% 24.04% 22.10% 15.97% 21.84% 20.45% 14.69% nla Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of March 700,000.00 600,000.00 500,000.00 400,000.00 March 300,000.00 8 February a January 200,000.00 100,000.00 0.00 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 511 312 0 1 3 2013 to 2012 Difference 10,540 22.73% 99,112 176.62% 442 0.62% 110,093 63.20% Page 0 ZO \\SV- FS2\Users\mcalhoun\Bonds\ debt capacity CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2/22/2013 Debt Capacity 2012 Assessed Value for 2013 Property Taxes 6,921,825,295 Maximum Outstanding Remaining Debt as of Debt % Capacity 12/31/2012 Capacity Utilized Voted (UTGO) 1.00% of assessed value 69,218,253 0 69,218,253 0,00% Nonvoted (LTGO) 1.50% of assessed value 103,827,379 7,690,000 96,137,379 7.41% Voted park 2,50% of assessed value 173,045,632 0 173,045,632 0.00% Voted utility 2.50% of assessed value 173,045,632 0 173,045,632 0.00% 12/1/2010 110,000 519,136,896 7,690,000 511,446,896 1.48% Bonds Repaid Bonds Remaining 2003 LTGO Bonds 60,000 85,0 0 Road & 12/1/2005 Period 90,0 Street I 12/1/2006 Ending CenterPlace Improvemen s Total 12/1/2004 60,000 85,0 0 145,000 12/1/2005 75,000 90,0 165,000 12/1/2006 85,000 90,00 175,000 12/1/2007 90,000 95,00 185,000 12/1/2008 95,000 95,00 190,000 12/1/2009 105,000 100,00 205,000 12/1/2010 110,000 100,000 210,000 12/1/2011 120,000 105,000 225,000 12/1/2012 130,000 110,000 240,000 12/1/2022 870,000 870,000 1,740,000 12/1/2013 140,000 115,000 255,000 12/1/2014 150,000 120,000 270,000 12/1/2015 160,000 125,000 285,000 12/1/2016 170,000 130,000 300,000 12/1/2017 180,000 135,000 315,000 12/1/2018 220,000 140,000 360,000 12/1/2019 250,000 145,000 395,000 12/1/2020 290,000 150,000 440,000 12/1/2021 325,000 160,000 485,000 12/1/2022 360,000 165,000 525,000 12/1/2023 405,000 175,000 580,000 12/1/2024 450,000 0 450,000 12/1/2025 490,000 0 490,000 12/1/2026 535,000 0 535,000 12/1/2027 430,000 0 430,000 12/1/2028 340,000 0 340,000 12/1/2029 295,000 0 295,000 12/1/2030 280,000 0 280,000 12/1/2031 240,000 0 240,000 12/1/2032 190,000 0 190,000 12/1/2033 230,000 0 230,000 6,130,000 1,560,000 7,690,000 7,000,000 2,430,000 9,430,000 Page 21 MEMO TO: Mike Jackson, City Manager FROM: Rick VanLeuven, Chief of Police DATE: May 20, 2013 RE: Monthly Report April 2013 April 2013: April 2012: CAD incidents: 4,791 CAD incidents: 4 „930 Reports taken: 1,847 Reports taken: 1,747 Traffic stops: 1,051 Traffic stops: 1,342 Traffic reports: 293 Traffic reports: 330 CAD incidents indicate calls for service as well as self - initiated officer contacts. Hot spot maps are attached showing April residential burglaries, traffic collisions, vehicle prowlings, and stolen vehicles. Also attached are trend -line graphs for 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013: Citations, Spokane Valley Dispatched Calls, Self- Initiated Calls, Collisions, Persons Crimes, Property Crimes, and Sex Crimes. Also included is the April Crimes By Cities stats report. This report reflects incidents that occurred in a specific city to which a deputy from Spokane County took the courtesy report. For instance, an individual may have had his car stolen in Airway Heights, and he waited until he returned home in the Newman Lake to make a report. In 2011, we switched from UCR to NIBRS classification. As a result, certain crimes were broken down to their violation parts for NIBRS and each part is now counted. Consequently, comparing certain crimes before 2011 to crimes during or after 2011 is not possible using the graphs. The crimes that are impacted by the NIBRS classification changes and should not be compared to prior graphs include: Adult Rape, Assault, Forgery and Theft. ADMINISTRATIVE: Chief VanLeuven attended the annual Our Kids: Our Business Kick -Off Luncheon in mid -April at the Convention Center, featuring Robin Karr- Morse, who spoke on "Ghosts from the Nursery.” Crime Prevention Deputy Chris Johnston spoke to a group of pharmacy tech students at the Spokane Community College in mid -April. He received a thank you from the director of the program, who stated, "I just to say thank you for taking the time out of your busy schedule to meet with the students in the Pharmacy Technician Program at Spokane Community College on Monday. The students took away some very valuable information and feel they are better prepared if a crisis arises." She also added that she will definitely be requesting he address future groups of students. Page 1 John Nowels, who headed up the Spokane Valley Police's Property Crimes Unit, was recently promoted to lieutenant and transferred downtown mid -month to the Investigative Support Unit. Sgt. Khris Thompson, who worked as a detective in the Property Crimes Task Force before being promoted to sergeant in 2009, replaced Lt. Nowels as the Property Crimes Sergeant. He brings great investigative skills and experience to the job and is a welcome addition to the SVPD Team. Chief VanLeuven and Sgt. Eylar met with officials from all the school administrations in the Spokane Valley where our School Resource Deputies (SRD's) are assigned. Chief VanLeuven talked with them about making sure the Spokane Valley Police Department is meeting their needs. He also discussed the need to review and practice their emergency event plans, which they are all doing. All, without a doubt, were very happy about the service they were getting and with the hard work the SRD's are doing at each school district. It was very evident that the students are comfortable with the SRD's, approaching them and talking to them about a variety of different issues, which confirms they are very committed to doing the very best they can for their individual districts. Chief VanLeuven and other command staff members attended "Police, Media and Positive Public Perception" three -day course in mid -April that was offered at the Spokane County Sheriff's Training Center in Spokane Valley. Chief VanLeuven attended Quarterly Leadership Training in April as well as the quarterly Drug Task Force meeting and other monthly meetings. He also attended a required quarterly In- Service Training at the Sheriff's Training Center. Chief VanLeuven traveled to Burien WA to attend the FBI Active Shooter Training that was held in late April. This was a two -day training sponsored by the Criminal Justice Training Commission. Chief VanLeuven invited new Spokane Valley Fire Chief Bryan Collins to the precinct for a tour of the facility and discussed cooperation between the agencies. The June 1St Spokane Valley Mall Exercise is quickly approaching. Numerous meetings were held during the month of April to coordinate all the different agencies who will be participating in the exercise. Officers will be represented from various local agencies as well as nearby law enforcement. The end of April concluded with the semi -annual Drug Take Back and Shred Event at the Spokane Valley Police Precinct. This event, once again, was very successful, which was sponsored by the Drug Enforcement Agency. COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING: S.C.O.P.E. welcomed 34 new volunteers in the month of April. They participated in the following events during the month of April: • S.C.O.P.E. Basic and COP Training • Washington State Crime Prevention Association Conference • Take 25 organizational meeting • GSSAC Coalition meeting Page 2 SIRT (S.C.O.P.E. Incident Response Team) CERT (Community Emergency Response Team) meeting Operation Family ID April 2013 Volunteers Hours per station: Location # Volunteers Admin Hours L.E. Hours Total Hours Central Valley 13 701.0 102 803.0 Edgecliff 19 398.0 14 412.0 Trentwood 4 201.5 82 283.5 University 37 977.5 233 1,210.5 TOTALS 73 2,278.0 431 2,709.0 Volunteer Value ($21.62 per hour) $58,568.58 for April 2013 S.C.O.P.E. Incident Response Team (SIRT) volunteers contributed 49 on -scene hours (including travel time) in April, responding to crime scenes, motor vehicle accidents and providing traffic control. Of those hours, 44 hours were for incidents in Spokane Valley. Special Event hours ( "Race2Place ") totaled 18. Total April volunteer hours contributed by SIRT, including training, stand -by, response and special events is 510; year -to -date total is 2,037 hours. S.C.O.P.E. DISABLED PARKING ACTIVITY REPORT City of Spokane Valle # of Vol. # of Vol. # of Hrs # of Disabled Infractions Issued # of Warnings Issued # of Non - Disabled Infractions Issued January 6 123 22 0 0 February 4 83 11 0 0 March 7 147.5 36 0 0 April 8 160 28 0 0 Total 25 513.5 97 0 0 Spokane County # of Vol. # of Hrs # of Disabled Infractions Issued # of Warnings Issued # of Non - Disabled Infractions Issued January 2 2 0 0 0 February 2 6 0 0 0 March 3 31 0 0 0 April 3 24 5 0 0 Total 10 63 5 0 0 Page 3 There were 34 reports of juveniles who ran away from their home in Spokane Valley during the month of April 2013, 2 of which remain unsettled. Out of the 34 reports, 14 of the reports involved juveniles running from a group home. One young man was responsible for 9 of those 14 reports; he was booked into Juvenile Detention near the end of the month for 1St Degree Arson charges. Abandoned vehicles tagged by S.C.O.P.E. volunteers for impoundment in Spokane Valley in March totaled 13 and in April 24 with 2 vehicles in March and 9 in April, respectively, eventually cited and towed. Seventeen hulks were processed in March and 12 hulks processed in April. During the month of April, a total of 75 vehicles were processed; the total for 2013 to date is 244. OPERATIONS: Regional Property Crime Task Force — In early April, Spokane County Sheriff Ozzie Knezovich along with Spokane Police Chief Frank Straub, Liberty Lake Police Chief Brian Asmus, Airway Heights Police Chief Lee Bennett, Cheney Police Chief John Hensley and Lt. Andy Boyle from the Kootenai County Sheriffs Office announced the formation of a regional Property Crime Task Force. Coeur d'Alene Police Wayne Longo and Post Falls Police Chief Scot Haug also accepted Sheriff's Knezovich's invitation to join the Task Force. The task force has been implemented due to the amount of property crimes committed throughout Spokane County and North Idaho. Agencies involved with this unit will share intelligence and data with the anticipated result of targeting times, locations and persons committing property crime in our region. Based on this information, agencies will focus resources strategically to combat this type of criminal activity and also to educate the public so citizens are aware of issues within their community. Shooting Investigation - Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputies responded to the 300 block of South Dishman Road to a shooting call at 7:10 a.m. in early April. The victim contacted deputies at the Valley Precinct and said he had broken down in front of the address on Dishman and was fired at one time. An employee at a neighboring business said he heard what he thought was one gunshot as well. While deputies were investigating this incident, they were notified by the North Idaho Violent Crimes Task Force that they had an active investigation involving the same address the shooting took place. A search warrant for the address was obtained and the Spokane County Sheriffs Office SWAT Team, Explosive Disposal Unit, and hostage negotiators served the warrant for the Violent Crime Task Force. A 36- year -old male was located and arrested for Aiming or Discharging a Firearm at the Dishman address stemming from the original incident to which deputies responded. Assault Victim Arrested - On an afternoon in early April, Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputies responded to a fight call at the intersection of 4th and Pines. Deputies received information that one of the male combatants, wearing a black hooded sweatshirt, had pulled a handgun on another male after he was punched in the face. The other male in the altercation was not located. Deputy C. Hilton arrived on scene and saw the armed male walking north on Pines. Deputy Hilton contacted the 33- year -old male at Sprague and Pines. Deputy Hilton ordered the male suspect to the ground, since he was reported to be armed. The male refused to cooperate and ran northwest across Sprague Avenue. Deputy Hilton advised he was in foot pursuit of the suspect and saw he dropped a backpack he was carrying. Deputy Hilton chased the male suspect across Sprague to the northwest corner of Sprague and Pines. The male then ran behind a truck, threw a handgun onto the ground, and continued running. The gun was retrieved by a detective and later determined it had been stolen. Deputy Hilton continued chasing the male and saw him throw a plastic baggie on the ground. Deputy Hilton later Page 4 collected the baggie that contained a white substance that tested presumptive positive for methamphetamine. Once Deputy Hilton caught up to the male suspect, he deployed his taser one time and took him into custody. The male suspect admitted that the methamphetamine belonged to him and that he had a drug problem. The suspect has nine prior felony convictions that include Possession of a Stolen Vehicle, Possession of Stolen Property 1st Degree, Trafficking in Stolen Property, Taking a Motor Vehicle Without Permission, Possession of a Stolen Motor Vehicle, Residential Burglary, and Forgery. The 33- year -old male was booked into the Spokane County Jail for the charges of Possession of a Stolen Firearm, Unlawful Possession of Firearm, Possession of a Controlled Substance, Obstructing, and Possessing Burglary Tools. Valley Standoff —In the early morning hours in early April, Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputies responded to the Sullivan Court Apartments to a shooting call. Information provided to 911 was that there were male subjects arguing in the parking lot and that two gun shots were heard. No injuries were reported. Deputies arrived on scene and detained two adult male subjects who were attempting to leave the complex. They told deputies they had been inside a residence where an argument took place with a 32- year -old male. Deputies quickly learned the male had a felony warrant for his arrest for a weapons violation charge and that he had possibly pointed a weapon at the two male subjects in the parking lot. Due to the male's history, the complex was secured and Sheriffs Office SWAT personnel, the Bomb Squad, and Sheriffs Office hostage negotiators responded to the scene. At approximately 6:20 a.m., the male suspect was taken into custody without incident. The suspect was booked into the Spokane County Jail on the felony warrant. Deputies and K9 Laslo Locate Wanted Suspects - On an evening in early April, Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputy Chan Erdman was patrolling in the area of Valleyway and University when he recognized a male walking on Valleyway. He checked the 36- year -old male's name on his mobile computer and found he was wanted for multiple felony warrants. Deputy Erdman turned around and attempted to locate the male suspect in the area with the assistance of additional deputies, including Deputy Jeff Thurman and his K9 partner, Laslo. While looking for the male, Deputy Erdman noticed another male he recognized riding a bicycle. He checked this 37- year -old's name and learned he was also wanted for multiple warrants, as he watched him ride into the yard of a duplex in the 400 block of North University. Deputy Thurman and Laslo continued to search for the first male suspect, starting a track from his last seen location. Laslo tracked back to the same duplex where the second male was last seen. The resident owner of the duplex was contacted and gave consent for both units of the duplex to be searched. The deputies decided to search the vacant side of the duplex first. As K9 Laslo let his presences be known, Deputy Thurman made several announcements a K9 would be used for the search if anyone inside did not identify themselves. The first male suspect voluntarily came out of the unit and was taken into custody without incident. Deputies search the unit and did not locate anyone else inside. They went over to the second unit and again made several announcements for anyone inside to come out but their attempts were unsuccessful. They began to search the inside when Laslo alerted on a closed bedroom door. Deputy Thurman made several more announcements for anyone in the bedroom to surrender, but no one came out. The door was opened, Laslo entered and made contact with the second male suspect. The deputies entered and tried to place the male in handcuffs, but he continued to resist while Deputy Thurman took control of Laslo. After a short struggle, the male was taken into custody; he was treated by medical staff before being transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail. He was charged with new misdemeanors of Resisting Arrest and Obstructing a Peace Officer in addition to a Felony and a Misdemeanor Warrant. The first male was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for two Felony Warrants. Page 5 Stolen Vehicle Recovered, Several Arrests - On a Saturday morning in mid -April, Spokane Valley Sheriff s Deputy R. Cunningham pulled in behind a 1995 Honda Civic, which had been reported stolen, as it travelled southbound on Coleman at Mansfield. He stayed behind the vehicle as he waited for additional patrol units to assist with the traffic stop or in case the driver decided to flee. In the area of Fancher Rd. and Broadway with the assistance of several additional patrol units, Deputy Cunningham activated his emergency lights and the driver of the Honda pulled into a parking lot located in the 300 block of N. Fancher and stopped. During the stop, the three occupants were cooperative and followed commands. All three suspects were arrested and transported to the Spokane County Jail. The 27- year -old male driver was booked on a Felony charge of Possession of a Stolen Motor Vehicle. A 29- year -old female passenger was booked for a local Misdemeanor Theft Warrant. The other passenger, a 32- year -old female, was booked Felony Warrants for 1st Degree Robbery, 1st Degree Burglary & a Community Custody Hold. She was also booked on a Misdemeanor Warrant. Stabbing /Robbery Incident - On a Monday evening in mid -April, Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputies responded to the 8500 block of E. Sharp Road in Spokane Valley on a stabbing call. The adult male victim told deputies that he was walking north on Vista Road approaching Broadway when he was confronted by an adult male. The suspect was a white male, wearing a grey hooded sweatshirt, approximately 5'11 ", 150 lbs and had a grayish brown beard. The victim estimated the age of the suspect in his early 30's. The victim said the suspect demanded money. When the victim refused, he said the suspect struck him with some type of edged weapon. The victim placed his hands in the air to shield the attack and was cut on his left hand. The victim threw his wallet on the ground telling the suspect to take it. The suspect took a $10.00 bill out of his wallet and ran northbound on Vista. The victim received nine stitches in his left hand from the assault. Crime Stoppers is offering a cash reward for anyone providing information leading an arrest in this incident. Persons with information should call the Crime Stoppers Tip Line at 1- 800 - 222 -TIPS, or should forward the tip via the Internet website www. crimestQppersinlandnorthwest .org. Tipsters do not have to give their name to collect the cash reward. Crime Stoppers of the Inland Northwest is a civilian organization that promotes public safety by paying cash rewards for information that solves crimes. It is not affiliated with law enforcement. Robbery Suspect Wanted - On a Saturday evening in mid -April, Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputies responded to a robbery call at Divines Gas Station located at Pines and Mission in Spokane Valley. The employee /victim told 911 that an adult male suspect had assaulted him in the neck with a pen, and then took an undisclosed amount of U.S. currency from the cash register. When deputies arrived on scene, the victim said the suspect rode away from the business on a bicycle. He told deputies he last saw the suspect riding north across Mission on the east side of Comfort Inn located at 12415 E. Mission Ave. Corporal Jeff Shover responded to the area and located an abandoned bicycle behind American Behavioral Health Services (ABHS), located at 12715 E. Mission. The victim positively identified the bicycle as the one on which the suspect rode off. Deputies contacted staff at American Behavioral Health Services to inquire if the suspect was a resident of the facility. Staff members told deputies they were not able to either confirm or deny if the suspect was a resident. Additionally, staff members contacted their supervisor on the phone and were told they were not able to confirm or deny any information requested by law enforcement, even with the knowledge that one of their residents had just possibly committed a robbery within a block of their facility. At about 12:56 a.m., American Behavioral Health Services called Crime Check and reported that a 31- year -old male had walked away from the facility. They reported he was found missing at 12:15 a.m., then reported the incident at Page 6 12:55 a.m. Information provided by ABHS staff as to what the male was last seen wearing and his physical appearance matched the description of the suspect as reported by the victim of the robbery. Spokane County Sheriffs Office Major Crimes Detective Kirk Keyser was assigned this robbery case. The victim has positively identified the 31- year -old male suspect, who is currently wanted for 1st Degree Robbery. Laslo Locates Fugitive - On a Wednesday night in late April, Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputies assisted a federal agency in apprehending a wanted fugitive. The 20- year -old suspect had fled federal agents and a short time later his vehicle was found in a ditch, abandoned, in the area of Dishman Mica and Appleway. The male suspect was considered armed and dangerous and had a history of possessing firearms. Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputies assisted and set up a perimeter to locate the male. Deputy Jeff Thurman and his K9 partner Laslo responded to the scene and a short time later located the male hiding in an outhouse several blocks from the vehicle. The suspect failed to listen to Deputy Thurman's commands to exit the outhouse and was introduced to Laslo. The male was taken into custody and when Deputy Thurman asked him why he did not listen to his commands, he said he had dealt with a police K9 in the past and was "scared." The male was released to federal agents after he was treated and released at a local hospital. Commendable Efforts — In early April, 911 received a frantic call from the wife of a male who was attempting suicide by cutting his arm and then stabbing himself. She was obviously frightened and feared for the safety of herself and her two young preschool children who were still in the home. She had taken her children and fled to the basement, but could hear her husband moving around on the main floor of the home. Numerous units responded, including Greg Snyder, Chan Erdman, Jerad Kiehn, and Liberty Lake's Taj Wilkerson. Upon arrival they found the male bleeding heavily on the kitchen floor. Deputy Snyder began applying pressure to the wounds. Officer Wilkerson and Deputy Kiehn went to the basement. Officer Wilkerson went with the children to a basement room and kept them occupied by playing games while Deputy Kiehn comforted the wife. They kept her and the children in the basement while medics worked on her husband upstairs. The firemen expressed that the male was in very serious condition and near death. Once he had been transported to the hospital, on -scene personnel realized that the only way to get the children out of the basement was to walk them past the kitchen where their father had bled heavily on the counters and floor. Officer Wilkerson devised a plan for a game of hide and seek where the children would cover their eyes while he and Deputy Kiehn carried them upstairs and to the back yard. The deputies upstairs were informed of the plan and they would try and stand in such a position as to shield the children from the kitchen should they open their eyes. Several minutes passed while arrangements were being made with relatives for the children so that the wife could go to the hospital. Before they made their way up the stairs to the kitchen, Deputy Erdman, on his hands and knees, along with two firemen were cleaning up the blood with cleaning supplies they found in the home. Because of extraordinary efforts of these officers, the wife and her children were able to leave the home without being exposed to the gruesome mess. They are to be recognized and commended. The family of the victim sent a thank you card to the Valley Precinct expressing their appreciation for all that was done for their family during the incident. They offered that although their family member has a lot of recovering to do, he did survive and it was due to the efforts of the first responders. Fatal Spokane Valley Collision - On an early Monday morning in late April, Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputies responded to a one - vehicle collision at Mission and Felts. When Deputy Jerad Kiehn and Deputy Ken Dodge arrived on scene, they found the engine compartment of the vehicle on Page 7 fire and the adult male driver trapped inside the vehicle. Unable to remove the driver from the vehicle, Deputies Kiehn and Dodge used several fire extinguishers to keep the flames from the engine compartment away from the driver. Valley Fire personnel arrived on scene, extinguished the fire, and had to extract the driver from the vehicle. Sheriffs Office collision investigators investigated the collision. The vehicle had been traveling eastbound on Mission, swerved across the westbound lane of traffic and struck a large tree head -on. According to investigators, the driver was transported to a local hospital and eventually succumbed to his injuries. Fire officials commended Deputy Kiehn and Deputy Dodge for their efforts in keeping the fire contained to the engine compartment of the vehicle, which gave the victim his only chance of survival. Latest ATM Scam - Two north Spokane financial institution ATM machines have fallen prey to a new scamming technique. This technique involves the suspect(s) super gluing the cancel button, or another similar type button, on the machine so the victim's transaction is not able to be processed. The result of this technique is that it is possible the machine will not release the victim's debit or credit card. This is alarming for a couple reasons. If the victim becomes frustrated and leaves, many machines have a short time delay before the card is not returned and stored in the machine for security purposes. If the suspect is able to get to the machine within this time frame, it is possible for them to defeat their alteration of the machine and either retrieve your credit card or continue with the transaction. Anyone who experiences this type of issue with an ATM machine is urged to immediately contact their financial institution as well as the business the machine is located. Burglars Latest Target - With the warm summer months quickly approaching, it seems like a good time to dust off the portable window air conditioning units, seal them into place and make sure they are working properly. The Spokane County Sheriffs Office has seen several reports of homeowners having these units taken out of their windows. These units contain internal copper components that the criminal element is taking to recycle. As always, citizens are encouraged to report suspicious activity they observe to either 911 or Crime Check at 509- 456 -2233. Neighborhoods interested in organizing a Neighborhood Block Watch Program in Spokane Valley can contact Deputy Chris Johnston at 477 -2592. Scammers Spoof Police Department Phone Number, Pretend to be Debt Collectors - Liberty Lake Police Department contacted Better Business Bureau alerting of a scam targeting the Spokane region. A Spokane resident received a call from a (509) area code phone number claiming to be a police deputy named 'Wilkerson.' The supposed 'deputy' aggressively told the Spokane man he had an outstanding bill and would be arrested if he didn't pay up. The scammer provided a (972) area code phone number for the man to call back and pay. The victim chose to call the phone number showing on his caller ID, and to his surprise, he reached the Spokane Sheriffs Regional Training Center, who knew nothing of the call. After receiving a second call from the same phone number, the resident researched to find and contact Officer Taj Wilkerson with the Liberty Lake Police Department, who informed the Spokane man there was no investigation into a debt and this was indeed a scam. Officer Taj Wilkerson followed up with the alleged 'debt collector,' contacted the (972) phone number, and reached an operation claiming to be in Dallas, Texas. The contact person provided a bogus address and refused to provide any further details. Fake debt collection calls are a very serious scam, and victims must remain calm amidst aggressive, threatening tactics often used by scammers. Page 8 Better Business Bureau offers a few tips when faced with a fake debt collection call: • Never provide or confirm bank account, credit card, or other personal information over the phone until you have confirmed the legitimacy of the call. • Ask the debt collector to provide official documentation which substantiates the debt. • Know your rights, familiarize yourself with the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, which describes both the collectors and debtors rights in the process. • Be wary. Local police or any other governing body will NEVER contact you out of the blue about a debt. Thank you from Gretchen Smith: Hello! I am a HUD social worker in Spokane Valley and am the Services Coordinator for the HUD property Pines Manor. We had Deputy Chris Johnston out on 4/4 to present to our residents on the topic of "Fraud." I always like to give credit where credit is due and want to say that Deputy Johnston's presentation was fantastic. He kept the residents engaged, provided current and interesting information, and also thankfully had a sense of humor. Our residents here are very trusting in general and he was able to deliver the information without scaring them, but empowering them. This is such a wonderful service and we are so very lucky to live in Spokane Valley. Thank you for all you do. Motorist/Pedestrian Safety Reminders - As warmer weather results in more pedestrian traffic, the Spokane County Sheriffs Office would like to remind both pedestrians and motorists of the rules of the road when dealing with crosswalks. Pedestrians crossing at marked crosswalks, without pedestrian control devices, need to make sure that there is a natural safe void in traffic before entering the roadway. In other words, pedestrians cannot jump in front of vehicles in the crosswalk when it is not safe or possible for the vehicle to stop. Pedestrians often feel a false sense of security when they are in a marked crosswalk. As a reminder, maintain eye contact with the motoring public to ensure a safe crossing. Motorists have responsibilities as well. Once a pedestrian enters the roadway, motorists are required to allow the pedestrian to cross safely. On a multi -lane roadway in opposite directions, if the pedestrian is within one lane of your vehicle on either side, you are required to stay stopped until the pedestrian is at least two lanes away from your vehicle. On a one -way road, if any vehicle is stopped at an intersection, all vehicles are required to stop. This is required because more often than not, the vehicle stopped at the intersection will obstruct the view of the pedestrian attempting to cross the road. Finally, any intersection in Spokane County is considered a cross walk, including T- intersections and round -a- bouts. It does not matter if the intersection is marked with the crosswalk markings or not. Page 9 2013 APRIL CRIME REPORT To date: Yearly totals: Apr -13 Apr -12 2013 2012 1 2,012 2011 2,010 2009 2008 2007 BURGLARY 93 83 359 272 1062 1027 936 725 753 584 FORGERY 90 71 317 277 826 593 341 297 354 365 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 131 128 548 510 1770 1566 1183 1245 893 1,265 NON - CRIMINAL 12 11 41 34 108 160 917 892 944 839 PROPERTY OTHER 127 103 442 387 1236 1126 837 933 828 890 RECOVERED VEHICLES 43 40 172 134 446 416 365 187 319 343 STOLEN VEHICLES 47 43 202 173 586 566 496 298 496 478 THEFT 214 256 934 817 2636 2512 2365 2162 1,846 1,881 VEHICLE OTHER 33 17 103 75 287 195 3 5 7 3 VEHICLE PROWLING 109 60 415 276 1165 1491 1395 920 1069 682 TOTAL PROPERTY CRIMES 899 812 3,533 2,956 10,328 9,615 8,852 7,668 7,513 7,338 ASSAULT 89 73 281 330 936 963 895 927 869 853 DOA/SUICIDE 25 19 80 90 256 213 188 210 269 221 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 61 38 207 155 600 714 1297 1226 1063 874 HOMICIDE 0 0 0 1 2 3 1 3 3 1 KIDNAP 1 2 4 51 17 15 16 21 16 23 MENTAL 17 16 86 96 270 253 289 310 360 350 MP 8 10 50 43 154 125 128 115 951 83 PERSONS OTHER 288 252 1089 986 3112 2484 1692 1621 1,354 1,337 ROBBERY 13 7 36 22 79 98 68 75 71 60 TELEPHONE HARASSMENT 17 25 56 72 212 162 153 159 95 73 TOTAL MAJOR CRIMES 519 442 1889 1800 5638 49971 4727 4,667 4,195 3,875 ADULT RAPE 3 8 20 26 89 67 44 35 441 43 CHILD ABUSE 1 0 5 9 27 89 115 159 148 104 CUSTODIAL INTERFERENCE 13 10 50 43 190 184 206 157 86 92 SEX REGISTRATION F 01 2 0 3 8 2 1 2 3 4 INDECENT LIBERTIES 1 2 8 7 27 17 8 10 11 18 RAPE /CHILD 0 1 3 3 13 23 28 35 39 31 RUNAWAY 39 69 152 229 530 510 490 440 369 295 SEX OTHER 6 6 17 11 38 56 215 211 179 194 STALKING 3 2 9 7 24 19 18 15 21 17 SUSPICIOUS PERSON 43 34 143 142 424 341 215 175 142 152 TOTAL SEX CRIMES 109 134 407 480 1370 1294 1387 1271 1,108 996 TOTAL ITF 27 29 128 155 430 521 542 671 838 808 TOTAL TRAFFIC REPORTS 293 330 12331 1397 3957 3569 3081 3,183 3,811 3,800 TOTAL REPORTS RECEIVED 1,847 1,74711 7,1901 6,788 21,7231 19,996 18,589 17,460 17,4651 16,817 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 N Charge Count from Tickets: Spokane Valley JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC --)K-- 2010 X2011 2012 -0-2013 Spokane Valley Dispatched Calls 4000 3500 3000 I 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV I DEC 2010 X2011 2012 -0 2013 300 250 200 150 100 50 SPOKANE VALLEY TRAFFIC COLLISIONS JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC A 2010 --0--2011 2012 P 2013 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 JAN FEB MAR Spokane Valley Person Crimes APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC --I-- 2010 X2011 2012 --K+---2013 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Spokane Valley Property Crimes JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC --I-- 2010 X2011 2012 �0-1 2013 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 411 0 Spokane Valley Self Initiated Incidents // >K a I JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 2010 X2011 2012 -0 2013 .� 50 40 30 20 10 0 Spokane Valley Sex Crimes I I >K I JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC --W- 2010 X2011 2012 -0 2013 7 N 11 10 Spokan4IVall M "s 6th 2nd G ran ite Lake i^ x R om imm o3' 1 e\ h ge11e Terre Commercial 3 th E v 41st �, o Burglaries dra e <ro 42nd Ball I ° a 43r1 e y Echo res 44 0- k 4 d e 45 h e m th horpe 45th 0 2 LL a IF A s mn ih nk Low A It e, r r c P cess `C lg Medium o se 54 c c 57th ✓ac � dk ry Q �o ' Moh6t Se n High I 1 0.5 IMiles 2013 April Commercial Burglary Hotspots 09 May 2013 I i I 7 N 11 0 10 Spokan4'Vall M "s 6th G ran ite 6 Lake i^ x 3 th °m imm ❑o�'i w h 41st ° gme c c Residential 2 L dra a46 t e <ro 42nd 1 Ball ° Burglaries i ° o - o 43rd e y 45 h 4 d Echo le e m 44 x 6� th horpe ate 45th 3 ao C �` 2 nr s- V Co o� U Ji m n w Em u_ A nk CP y E a LOW 5 It e,' F > P 3 06 q irP - F Medium s tA" ° P 57th 6t ✓ao °� �� G °�r� k i Ste b° High Y W � 0 0;5 iMiles 2013 April Residential Burglary Hotspots 09 May 2013 Clements b er - II 0o y Sun Ill a rest Lyils o 1 7 ri t o FOt� Joseph San on p Granite Mandalay 3 5 �� rF Fruit Hill > E e t G W� of o v Wabash _ c o N n e OIYR+OT 1 a - „nt cane L V dv er I ° --' L i ^ \ `w 0 ��. c i Sr oy red Brick m 0 rl e l7 _ 4 _ `o� b • iry ie _ �2. la, Budkey brace 111 M ietta P. saa Buckeye - t a� l c �e'r r ft0tt0r rlisle 2 � Mont ery � S okan M Kn Mans alle 4 °nt�'o ° S`F — fel p Y Rive n Lana w II ann 1 Fj y Bat in D Nora L °ra = m is ion Pit Old 0 Missi c a I ansnt kt'r CI w a I ^�. �; one iberty Lake ` w o _ E esimet Catald = Des et c w �L7e Cataldo '- 4 - C yVista Broad 0 p o eaGOk I i Valle wa I~ r n - L I W1e P Way y off Mia- _ M h e ide oar— 1 1 Q 3 2nd a $pr u c L-0 - — ,L' E Z i 4th - m F. Shep Y 6th 0 e ! R h 8th $ p th j c 9th / It _ 0 ° O mac' - � e 1 Z 4 16th 18th - @. ° v, v 20 ' 2 23 rd i 2 th an le^�e i e 25th e 6 h — >l whhr ti or to b Cli J _ > o t G Traffic p B Alo id 36h (� Collisions p.� P� m R n % Oo o gene Terre y 0 2 D 3 th '� ,Cimmar% O[h o m E F 41st 0 _ l � o C 3 � � Ball O o o 43r 4 4 Echo - 4th horpe th Low h� e c le to 6t 4 o ~� Il ], 7th = m Cow, of+ m n F 8t N Gnk ° e E Medium Low \ th es U > t ee 3' 0 Medium 54 h o the 5 th 57th th l �ccsr .� hi t � e Mohatt�o F s High 0 0.5 1 Miles 2013 April Traffic Co I I i s i on Hots pots Map Produced: °W' I I 09 May 2013'k: 7 ON ��IY'rr�� ' 1111111/ , � , �. ' '] SE —Ef , •'� r IL•L'E>f �� ,� .1■ -111 - _ .,y ` _ — Apr %'_ _• — � =— ��141.fi7 1� .�� ■�1 nnn�_ LOM El7__ _ & WN 000101,1 - ME NEW NO E ESS71L•J_ .. Rt��ii � Ezell ME 6th G ran ite Lake x C P ° f1 3 th R om imm off. m h F Belle Terre ma '0 Vehicle Prowling E `w � 41st o dra e<r° 42nd Ball i ° 0 43rd e O 45 h es o y 4 d Echo " 44 H 2 ° ° a 3 e m Q v >,L hor th P O 46th at 45th O 2 C 3 lenr F ' m n 48t F Em A nt 2 LL A E — Corl�r y °� LOW A S t 5 o� ire y Ile r P °es 8 �O c r i�6 F _ Medium se 54 c 57th 6t ✓a��ro �� Gory Ste Sana Moh�R� aed s � Pierce High w � O.s I Miles Map Produced: 2013 April Vehicle Prowl in g Hots pots 09 . May 2013 .�: 2013 APRIL CRIMES BY CITIES (Only crimes handled by Spokane County Sheriff's Office) 5/6/2013 rawf-.76911 M., ITETITZITUT, W, TOTAL PROPERTY CRIMES TOTAL MAJOR CRIMES SUSPPERSON TOTAL SEX CRIMES mQQQQQQ ® ©QmQQ I ' 0® TOTAL ITF TOTAL TRAFFIC TOTAL REPORTS RECEIVED 5/6/2013 2013 April INCIDENTS BY CITIES (Only incidents handled by Spokane County Sheriff's Office) 5/8/2013 AH CH DP FC FF LAH LL ML MW RF SCO SPA SPK SV WAV TOTALS CAD INCIDENTS 29 165 235 6 3 4 21 182 60 24 3,544 4 591 4,791 1 9,660 SELF INITIATED INCIDENTS 21 15 132 0 1 0 12 118 27 5 1,420 1 517 1,772 1 4,042 DRUG SELF INT (PATROL) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 3 0 7 TRAFFIC STOPS 10 2 66 0 0 0 6 43 11 1 784 1 356 1,051 0 2,331 TRAFFIC STOPS (ARST /CIT /IN) 6 1 21 0 0 0 1 11 6 0 376 0 170 540 0 1,132 TS (WARRANTS) 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 16 20 0 44 CALLS FOR SERVICE 8 150 103 6 2 4 9 64 33 19 2,124 3 74 3,019 0 5,618 ALARMS 0 2 6 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 125 0 0 104 0 241 ACCIDENTS 1 9 5 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 123 0 14 159 0 314 ACCIDENTS (ARREST /CIT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 9 0 12 DRUG CALLS 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 7 0 1 31 0 44 DV 11 0 5 0 0 0 2 3 2 0 85 0 8 154 0 270 DUI 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 79 0 3 61 0 149 DUI (ARREST) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 2 23 0 28 PURSUITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY 1 5 12 0 0 1 0 15 8 1 381 0 38 510 0 972 VEHICLE RECOVERED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 2 35 0 59 911 ABANDON LINE 0 61 6 4 0 0 0 5 3 1 154 0 5 299 0 538 SHOPLIFTING 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 0 36 ALL ARRESTS (ARREST /CIT /IN) 8 1 31 0 0 0 1 12 11 0 475 0 199 779 0 1,517 CRIME CHECK REPORTS 4 0 30 0 0 0 0 15 20 0 478 1 12 682 0 1,242 5/8/2013 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 11, 2013 Department Director Approval: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ® information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: June 2013 Ecology Supplemental Statewide Stormwater Grants GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Washington State Legislative 2012 Budget Appropriations PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Approval of 2014 -2019 Stormwater CIP, May 28, 2013. BACKGROUND: The State Department of Ecology is providing a new competitive funding opportunity for which the City of Spokane Valley, Stormwater Utility is eligible to apply for: Supplemental Statewide Stormwater Grant Program. The amount available for this program is $7.OM; applications are due by 14 June 2013. The goals for the funding are to construct improvements to protect State surface waters and /or drinking water supplies. Projects are to be completed before June 30, 2015. Staff has evaluated the grant criteria and matched it against the approved 2014 -2019 CIP program to determine which projects meet the requirements and have the best opportunity of receiving funding. Based upon this evaluation, staff has chosen the following two projects: The Broadway, Havana to Fancher SD Retrofit Project and the SE Yardly Retrofit Project(s). These projects best match the grant criteria, and are ones we had selected as grant eligible priority projects. The full implementation of the CIP is based on maximizing local funding with grant opportunities such as this one, and staff recommends proceeding with the applications. OPTIONS: Information RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Information BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: There is a 25% local match required to receive funding reimbursement for any grant awarded to the City with this program. The proposed 2014 Budget allocates funding from the Stormwater Utility Fund and the Aquifer Protection Fund to cover the local match for these projects if the City is successful in securing State award(s). STAFF CONTACT: Eric Guth, Public Works Director Art Jenkins, Stormwater Engineer ATTACHMENTS: