HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013, 08-13 Regular Meeting AGENDA
SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
FORMAL FORMAT MEETING
Tuesday,August 13,2013 6:00 p.m.
Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers
11707 E Sprague Avenue
Council Requests Please Silence Your Cell Phones During Council Meeting
CALL TO ORDER:
INVOCATION: Pastor Jerry Sponseller, Opportunity Baptist Church
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
ROLL CALL:
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS:
Introduction of Kevin Wallace, Spokane Regional Transportation Council(SRTC)Director
COMMITTEE,BOARD,LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS:
MAYOR'S REPORT:
PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those on
this agenda as action items. (Action items include public hearings, and those items under NEW
BUSINESS. Public Comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.)When
you come to the podium, please state your name and address for the record and limit remarks to three
minutes.
1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any
member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered
separately.
a.Approval of the following claim vouchers:
VOUCHER LIST VOUCHER NUMBERS TOTAL AMOUNT
07/18/2013 4421-4422; 4424-4425; 29735; 718130117 $70,472.21
07/18/2013 29736-29770 $424,901.79
07/25/2013 29771-29794 $125,265.27
07/25/2013 29795-29852; 11629891; 724130007 $213,873.74
08/01/2013 5616-5637 $1,634.00
08/01/2013 29853-29877; 731130035 $1,699,525.90
08/02/2013 29878-29898 $142,931.97
GRAND TOTAL $2,678,604.88
b. Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending July 31,2013: $435,989.94
c. Approval of July 23,2013 Council Meeting Minutes,Regular Formal Format
d. Approval of July 30,2013 Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session Format
e. Approval of Resolution 13-007 Setting Planning Commission Public Hearing for Street Vacation
Council Agenda 08-13-13 Formal Format Meeting Page 1 of 2
NEW BUSINESS:
2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 13-010, Sign Code Revisions—John Hohman [public comment]
3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 13-011,Zayo Franchise —Cary Driskell [public comment]
4.First Reading Proposed Ordinance 13-012 Lighting Code Revisions—Marty Palaniuk [public comment]
PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those on
this agenda as action items. (Action items include public hearings, and those items under NEW
BUSINESS. Public Comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.)When
you come to the podium, please state your name and address for the record and limit remarks to three
minutes.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS:
5. Surplus Items—Mark Calhoun
6. Estimated Revenues and Expenditures for 2014 Budget—Mark Calhoun
7. Lodging Tax Update—Mark Calhoun
8. Commute Trip Reduction Interlocal—Morgan Koudelka
9. Street Preservation Phase 2—Eric Guth
10. Park Acquisition Needs—Mike Stone
11.Advance Agenda—Mayor Towey
INFORMATION ONLY(will not be reported or discussed):
12. Parks and Recreation Quarterly Report
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
13.EXECUTIVE SESSION [RCW 42.30.110(1)(b) and(g)]
Potential acquisition of real estate; and review performance of a public employee.
ADJOURNMENT
General Meetini Schedule(meeting schedule is always subject to change)
Regular Council meetings are generally held every Tuesday beginning at 6:00 p.m.
The Formal meeting formats are generally held the 2nd and 4th Tuesdays. Formal meeting have time allocated for
general public comments as well as comments after each action item.
The Study Session formats(the less formal meeting)are generally held the 0,_s and 51 Tuesdays.
Study Session formats DO NOT have time allocated for general public comments; but if action items are included,
comments are permitted after those specific action items.NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who
require special assistance to accommodate physical,hearing, or other impairments,please contact the City Clerk at
(509)921-1000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made.
Council Agenda 08-13-13 Formal Format Meeting Page 2 of 2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: August 13, 2013 Department Director Approval: El
Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Following Vouchers:
VOUCHER LIST VOUCHER NUMBERS TOTAL AMOUNT
07/18/2013 4421-4422; 4424-4425; 29735; 718130117 $70,472.21
07/18/2013 29736-29770 $424,901.79
07/25/2013 29771-29794 $125,265.27
07/25/2013 29795-29852; 11629891; 724130007 $213,873.74
08/01/2013 5616-5637 $1,634.00
08/01/2013 29853-29877; 731130035 $1,699,525.90
08/02/2013 29878-29898 $142,931.97
GRAND TOTAL $2,678,604,88
Explanation of Fund Numbers found on Voucher Lists
#001 - General Fund Other Funds
001.011.000.511 City Council 101 —Street Fund
001.013.000.513. City Manager 103—Paths&Trails
001.013.015.515. Legal 105--Hotel/Motel Tax
001.016.000. Public Safety 120—CenterPlace Operating Reserve
001.018,013.513. Deputy City Manager 121 —Service Level Stabilization Reserve
001.018.014.514. Finance 122—Winter Weather Reserve
001.018.016.518. Human Resources 123 —Civic Facilities Replacement
001.032.000. Public Works 204—Debt Service
001.058.050.558. Comm. Develop.-Administration 301 —Capital Projects(1St i/a%REET)
001.058.055.558. Comm.Develop.—Develop.Eng. 302—Special Capital Proj (2nd '4%REET)
001.058.056.558. Community Develop.-Planning 303 —Street Capital Projects
001.058.057.558. Community Develop.-Building 304—Mirabeau Point Project
001.076.000.576. Parks &Rec—Administration 307—Capital Grants
001.076.300.576. Parks &Rec-Maintenance 309—Parks Capital Grants
001.076.301.571. Parks &Rec-Recreation 310--Civic Bldg Capital Projects
001.076.302.576. Parks &Rec-Aquatics 311 —Pavement Preservation
001.076.304.575. Parks &Rec- Senior Center 312—Capital Reserve
001.076.305.571. Parks &Rec-CenterPlace 402—Stormwater Management
001.090.000.511. General Gov't-Council related 403 —Aquifer Protection Area
001.090.000.514. General Gov't-Finance related 501 —Equipment Rental&Replacement
001.090.000.517. General Gov't-Employee supply 502—Risk Management
001.090.000.518. General Gov't- Centralized Services
001.090.000.519. General Gov't-Other Services
001.090.000.540, General Gov't-Transportation
001.090.000.550. General Gov't-Natural&Economic
001.090.000.560. General Gov't-Social Services
001.090.000.594. General Gov't-Capital Outlay
001.090.000,595. General Gov't-Pavement Preservation
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Approve claims for vouchers as listed above.
STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun, Finance Director; ATTACHMENTS: Voucher Lists
vchlist Voucher List
07/18/2013 3:21:13PM Spokane Valley
Page: 1
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
4421 7/19/2013 000048 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS,401A PLAN Ben50339 101.231.14.00 401A:Payment 29,224.34
Total: 29,224.34
4422 7/19/2013 000682 EFTPS Ben50341 001.231.11.00 FEDERAL TAXES:Payment 33,203.71
Total: 33,203.71
4424 7/19/2013 000145 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS,457 PL./ Ben50343 001,231.18.00 457 DEFERRED COMPENSATION:Payr 6,485.26
Total: 6,485.26
4425 7/19/2013 000162 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS,401A EXEC P1 Ben50345 001.231.14.00 401 EXEC PLAN:Payment 1,083.90
Total: 1,083.90
29735 7/19/2013 001896 DANIEL H BRUNNER Ben50337 001.231.20.00 BONDURANT 1203245:Payment 75.00
Total: 75.00
718130117 7/19/2013 003256 DISCOVERY BENEFITS,INC,HRA PLAN Ben0713 001.231.28.00 HEALTH REIMBURSEMENT:JOHN JOH 400.00
Total: 400.00
6 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 70,472.21
6 Vouchers in this report
Total vouchers: 70,472.21
Page: 1
vchlist
07/18/2013 3:59:07PM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 1
Bank code: apbank
Voucher
29736
29737
29738
29739
29740
29741
29742
29743
29744
29745
29746
29747
Date Vendor
Invoice
7/18/2013 000756 3C MA
7/18/2013 003076 AMSDEN, ERICA
7/18/2013 002655 AZTECH ELECTRIC INC
7/18/2013 003090 BIG R STORES
7/18/2013 002562 CD'A METALS
7/18/2013 003432 CROSS,JOHN&SUSAN
7/18/2013 000683 DAVID EVANS&ASSOCIATES
7/18/2013 002920 DIRECTV, INC
7/18/2013 000999 EASTERN WA ATTORNEY SVC, 1NC 67062
67823
AUGUST 2013
EXPENSE
PAY APP 4
049972/3
630029
CRYWOLF
332692
20843372545
7/18/2013 000106 FEDEX
7/18/2013 003261 FEHR& PEERS
7/18/2013 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC
2-326-90248
87340
40190
40246
40247
Fund/Dept
001.018.013.513
001.032.000.543
303.303.061.595
101.042.000.542
101.000.000.542
001.000.000.342
311.000.179.595
101.042.000.543
001.013.015.515
001.013.015.515
001.032.000.543
303.303.159.595
001.058.056.558
001.011.000.511
001.058.056.558
Description/Account
Amount
ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES:C. B
Total :
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
Total :
0061 -PINES ITS CONSTRUCTION
Total :
Total :
Total :
SUPPLIES: PW
SUPPLIES:PW
FALSE ALARM REFUND: PERMIT V
Total :
0179-2013 STREET PRES PH2 TRA
Total:
CABLE SERVICE FOR MAINTENAN
Total :
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Total :
SHIPPING CHARGES
Total:
0159-UNIVERSITY ROAD OVERPA
Total :
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
390.00
390.00
27.13
27.13
351,068.69
351,068.69
72.81
72.81
24.24
24.24
25.00
25.00
7,962.50
7,962.50
45.99
45.99
45.00
45.00
90.00
48.01
48.01
16,592.35
16,592.35
100.30
117.50
187.20
Page: 1
vchlist
0711812013 3:59:07PM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 2
Bank code: apbank
Voucher
29747
29748
29749
29750
29751
29752
29753
29754
29755
29756
29757
29758
Date Vendor
Invoice
7/18/2013 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC
7/18/2013 000007 GRAINGER
7/18/2013 003177 GUTH, ERIC
7/18/2013 000265 JACKSON,MIKE
7/18/2013 001944 LANCER LTD
7/18/2013 002259 MENKE JACKSON BEYER EHILS
7/18/2013 003433 MOORE, ROBERT
7/18/2013 002203 NAPA AUTO PARTS
7/18/2013 000881 OXARC
7/18/2013 002288 SARGENT ENGINEERS INC.
7/18/2013 001140 SPECIAL ASPHALT PRODUCTS
7/18/2013 000090 SPOKANE CO INFO SYSTEMS
(Continued)
40248
40249
9142021501
EXPENSE
AUGUST 2013
0437825
439
470
CRYWOLF
JUNE 2013
30733SS
28633
ORD20919
50310021
Fund/Dept
001.058.056.558
001.058.056.558
001.032.000.543
001.032.000.543
001.013.000.513
001.016.000.521
001.013.015.515
001.013.015.515
001.000.000.342
101.000.000.542
101.042.000.542
101.042.000.542
101.042.000.542
402.402.000.531
Description/Account
Amount
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
SUPPLIES: PW
Total :
Total :
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
Total :
AUGUST 2013 AUTO ALLOWANCE
Total :
BUSINESS CARDS FOR POLICE CE
Total :
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Total :
FALSE ALARM REFUND: PERMIT V
Total :
SUPPLIES: PW
SUPPLIES: PW
Total :
Total :
ON-CALL BRIDGE CONSULTING TA
Total :
SUPPLIES: PW
COUNTY IT SUPPORT
Total :
73.95
94.35
573.30
81.90
81.90
26.27
26.27
300.00
300.00
76.63
76.63
2,850.81
129.99
2,980.80
25.00
25.00
261.22
261.22
38.24
38.24
460.53
460.53
11,176.01
11,176.01
12,389.77
Page: 2
vchlist
07/18/2013 3:59:07PM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 3
Bank code:
Voucher
29758
29759
29760
29761
29762
29763
29764
29765
29766
29767
29768
29769
29770
apbank
Date Vendor
Invoice
7/18/2013 000090 000090 SPOKANE CO INFO SYSTEMS (Continued)
7/18/2013 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 5150715
7/18/2013 002835 SPOKANE COURIER SERVICES LLC 4030
7/18/2013 002540 SPOKANE HOUSE OF HOSE INC. 304112
7/18/2013 000093 SPOKESMAN-REVIEW
7/18/2013 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE
7/18/2013 001875 STRATA
7/18/2013 003431 THE PIN CENTER
7/18/2013 002597 TWISTED PAIR ENTERPRIZES L.L.0
7/18/2013 000964 VOLT MANAGEMENT CORP
7/18/2013 003070 WENTZ, SANDY
7/18/2013 000676 WEST
7/18/2013 003002 XO COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES
363750
3204171938
3204171939
513130148-IN
0713066
06302013
29518334
AQUATIC REFUND
827546024
0260217876
Fund/Dept
101.042.000.542
001.011.000.511
101.000.000.542
001.011.000.511
Description/Account
Amount
Total :
JUNE 2013 WORK CREW INVOICE
Total :
BROADCASTING SERVICES: COUF
Total :
SUPPLIES: PW
Total :
ADVERTISEMENT:ACCOUNT 4236
Total :
001.032.000.543 SUPPLIES: PW
001.018.013.513 SUPPLIES:ADMEN
311,000.174.595
001.011.000,511
001.011.000.511
001.090.000.518
001.076.302.347
001.013.015,515
001.076.305.575
Total :
0174-2013 STREET PRES MATTE
Total :
LAPEL PINS-CITY LOGO
Total :
BROADCASTING COUNCIL MTGS:.
Total :
HELP DESK TECH TEMP
Total :
SWIM LESSON REFUND FOR COO
Total :
JUNE SUBSCRIPTION CHARGES
Total:
TELEPHONE SERVICE:JULY 2013
Total :
12,389.77
6,001.25
6,001.25
60.00
60.00
24.26
24.26
1,815.96
1,815.96
30.89
15.44
46.33
9,206.34
9,206.34
338.50
338,50
847.86
847.86
620,16
620.16
35.00
35.00
722.00
722.00
447.74
447.74
Page: 3
vchlist
07/18/2013 3:59:07PM
Voucher List Page: 4
Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
35 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total : 424,901.79
35 Vouchers in this report
1,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury,
that the materials have been furnished,the services
rendered,or the labor performed as described herein
and that the claim is lust,due and an unpaid
obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that
I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim.
Finance Director Date
Mayor Date
Council Member Date
Total vouchers: 424,901.79
Page: 4
vchlist
07/25/2013 11:20:08AM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 1
Bank code:
Voucher
29771
29772
29773
apbank
Date Vendor Invoice
7/25/2013 000150 ALLIED FIRE&SECURITY IVC1023085
7/25/2013 000334 ARGUS JANITORIAL LLC INV008951
7/25/2013 000030 AVISTA June 2013
June 2013
29774 7/25/2013 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC 9450232
9452213
50057991
50058704
29775
29776
29777
29778
29779
29780
29781
7/25/2013 000904 BRANCH, CAROLBELLE
7/25/2013 001169 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
7/25/2013 002389 DIRECTPOS
7/25/2013 000011 GREATER SPOKANE VALLEY
7/25/2013 000741 HONEY BUCKETS
7/25/2013 001635 155 FACILITY/EVENT SERVICES
7/25/2013 001021 LARSON'S DEMOLITION, INC.
Expenses
July 2013
17900
2013
1-694603
618753
1166
Fund/Dept
001.076.305.575
001.016.000.521
101.042.000.542
001.076.302.576
001.076.305.575
001.076.305.575
001.076.305.575
001.076.305.575
001.018.013.513
001.032.000.543
001.076.302.576
001.090.000.550
001.076.300.576
001.076.305.575
001.076.099.576
Description/Account
KEYS
Total :
PRECINCT JANITORIAL SERVICES
Total :
UTILITIES:PW MASTER AVISTA
UTILITIES: PARKS MASTER AVISTA
Total :
LINEN SUPPLY AND SERVICE AT C
LINEN SUPPLY AND SERVICE AT C
LINEN SUPPLY AND SERVICE AT C
LINEN SUPPLY AND SERVICE AT C
Total :
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
Total :
PETTY CASH:9149,9140,9376
Total :
SERVICE AT PARK ROAD POOL
Total :
2013 OUTSIDE AGENCY: ECO DEV
Total :
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL: PARKS
Total :
EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLAI
Total :
DEMOLITION REMOVAL OF BROWI
Total :
Amount
19.57
19.57
2,386.87
2,386.87
24,514.60
14,957.48
39,472.08
41.32
50.26
44.69
68.75
205.02
1921
19.21
11.73
11.73
32.61
32.61
1,984.22
1,984.22
154.00
154.00
215.97
215.97
7,317.68
7,317.68
Page: 1
vchlist
07/25/2013 11:20:08AM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 2
Bank code:
Voucher
29782
29783
29784
29785
29786
29787
29788
29789
29790
29791
29792
apbank
Date
Vendor
7/25/2013 000252 LOWE'S BUSINESS ACCOUNT
7/25/2013 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC.
7/25/2013 001133 PATRIOT FIRE PROTECTION, INC.
7/25/2013 000415 ROSAUERS
7/25/2013 000189 SILVERWOOD THEME PARK INC.
7/25/2013 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST##3
Invoice
July 2013
1535305441
2311315
2311388
679776
696451
696502
696503
33105
July 2013
7/25/2013 001083 STANDARD PLBG HEATING CONTROLS 50927
50928
50945
7/25/2013 001922 SWANK MOTION PICTURES, INC
7/25/2013 001472 TESTAM ERICA LABORATORIES
7/25/2013 000295 VALLEYFEST
7/25/2013 000787 WMS AQUATICS
RG 1826903
59007394
107
14578
Fund/Dept Description/Account
001.076.305.575
402.402.000.531
001.016.000,521
001.076.305.575
001.076.301,571
001.076.301.571
001.076.301.571
001.076.301.571
001.076.301.571
OPERATING SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR PW
Total :
Total :
ANNUAL INSPECTION BACKFLOW:
ANNUAL INSPECTION BACKFLOWi
Total :
PARK PROGRAMS SUPPLIES
PARK PROGRAM CRAFT SUPPLIES
SUMMER DAY CAMP SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES FOR SUMMER CAMP
Total :
SUMMER DAY CAMP FIELD TRIP 71
Total :
101.042,000.542 WATER CHARGES: PW
001.076.305.575
001.076.305.575
001.076.305.575
001.076.301.571
Total :
JUNE 2013 MONTHLY MAINT: PRE(
ANNUAL MAINT AGREEMENT:CP
LABOR FOR CHILLER AT CENTERF
Total :
MOVIE LICENSES
001,076.300.576 TC/PA ANALYSIS: PARKS
001.076.305.575
001.076.302.576
Total :
Total :
FULL PAGE AD IN VALLEYFEST PU
Total :
TERRACE VIEW POOL TANK PAINT
Amount
246.31
246.31
59.77
59.77
298.93
391.32
690.25
52.91
3.25
55.08
15.70
126.94
2,358.18
2,358.18
596.52
596.52
570.68
7,666.92
128.27
8,365.87
511.98
511.98
27.00
27.00
1,515.00
1,515.00
32,066.50
Page: 2
vchlist
07125/2013 11:20:08A11/1
Voucher List Page: 3
Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor
29792 7/25/2013 000787 000787 WMS AQUATICS
29793 7/25/2013 000487 YMCA OF'THE INLAND NW
29794 7/25/2013 003128 YWCA OF SPOKANE
24 Vouchers for bank code: apbank
24 Vouchers in this report
I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury,
that the materials have been furnished,the services
rendered,or the labor performed as described herein
and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid
obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that
I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim.
Finance Director Date
Mayor Date
Council Member Date
Invoice
(Continued)
July 2013
July 2013
Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
Total : 32,066.50
001.076.302.576 JULY OPERATING EXPENSES AND 26,314.07
Total : 26,314.07
001.090.000.560 SOCIAL SERVICES GRANT REIMBI. 567.92
Total : 567.92
Bank total : 125,265.27
Total vouchers: 125,265.27
Page: 3
vchtist
07/25/2013 2:36:29PM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 1
Bank code:
Voucher
29795
29796
29797
29798
29799
29800
29801
29802
29803
29804
29805
29806
apbank
Date Vendor
7/25/2013 001685 AICPA
7/25/2013 001081 ALSCO
Invoice
00022574
LSPO1343519
7/25/2013 003337 ARROW CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY INC 123869
7/25/2013 002891 BASIN SOD INCORPORATED 1564
1670
7/25/2013 000173 BINGAMAN,GREG
7/25/2013 000904 BRANCH, CAROLBELLE
7/25/2013 000863 CENTURY WEST ENG CORP
7/25/2013 000322 CENTURYLINK
7/25/2013 000729 CH2MHILL INC
7/25/2013 000683 DAVID EVANS&ASSOCIATES
7/25/2013 000686 DEPT OF LICENSING
7/25/2013 000409 DEPT OF REVENUE
3RD QTR 2013
3RD QTR 2013
233772
JULY 2013
3859657
333674
333676
25601 0111975
3213-2013-QTR2
Fund/Dept
001.018.014.514
001.058.057.558
101.042.000.542
101.042.000.543
101.042.000.543
001.018.014.514
001.018.013.513
101.042.000.542
001.076.000.576
303.303.155.595
001.058.055.558
311.000.180.595
001.058.050.558
001.090.000.518
Description/Account
CALHOUN 13/14 MEMBERSHIP DUI
Total :
MAT SERVICES PERMIT CENTER
Total :
SUPPLIES:PW
SUPPLIES: PW
CREDIT MEMO: PW
Total :
Total :
3RD QTR CELL PHONE ALLOWANC
Total :
3RD QTR 2013 CELL PHONE ALLOT
Total :
2013 TIP SERVICES
Total :
2013 PHONE SVCS:ACCT 509 Z14-
Total :
0155-SULLIVAN RD W BRIDGE SL
Total :
2013 SURVEY ON-CALL SERVICES
0180-STEREET PRESERVATION P
Total :
NOTARY RENEWAL: DEANNA NOR'
Total :
2ND QTR MLS CREDIT CARD FEES
Amount
225.00
225.00
46.55
46.55
178.38
178.38
1,412.36
-121.00
1,291.36
135.00
135.00
135.00
135.00
6,330.21
6,330.21
517.48
517.48
50,992.55
50,992.55
922.00
3,951.50
4,873.50
30.00
30.00
301.22
Page: 1
vchlist
07125/2013 2:36:29PM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 2
Bank code: apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
29806 7/25/2013 000409 000409 DEPT OF REVENUE
29807 7/25/2013 000912 DEX MEDIA WEST
29808 7/25/2013 000746 EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPT
(Continued)
JULY 2013
JULY 2013
217156-00 2
29809 7/25/2013 003391 FAMILY HEALTH CARE OF ELLENSBU 0002000000011302
29810 7/25/2013 003261 FEHR&PEERS
29811 7/25/2013 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC
29812 7/25/2013 002235 GRAFOS, DEAN
29813 7/25/2013 000692 GUS JOHNSON FORD
29814 7/25/2013 003177 GUTH, ERIC
29815 7/25/2013 000002 H&H BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC.
29816 7/25/2013 002682 HAFNER, CHARLES
87984
Fund/Dept
001.076.304.575
001.076.305.575
502.502.000.517
001.018.016.518
303.303.159.595
Description/Account
Amount
Total :
ADVERTISING FOR SENIOR CENTS
ADVERTISING FOR CENTERPLACE
Total :
2ND QTR 2013 UI TAX
NEW EMPLOYEE PHYSICAL
Total :
Total :
0159-UNIVERSITY ROAD OVERPA
Total :
40034 303.000.175.595 LEGAL PUBLICATION
40293 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION
40294 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION
3RD QTR 2013
794741
3RD QTR 2013
083604
083650
083731
JUNE 2013
001.011.000.511
001.058.055.558
001.032.000.543
001.058.057.558
001.018.014.514
001.032.000.543
001.058.057.558
3RD QTR 2013 001.011.000.511
Total :
3RD QTR 2013 CELL PHONE ALLOT
Total :
4-008:OIL CHANGE
Total :
3RD QTR 2013 CELL PHONE ALLOT
Total :
STAPLE REFILL: CD COPIER
STAPLE REFILLS: FINANCE
STAPLE REFILLS: PW
COPIER COST
Total :
3RD QTR 2013 CELL PHONE ALLOT
Total :
301.22
31.74
441.86
473.60
484.63
484.63
51.75
51.75
12,482.06
12,482.06
161.60
35.70
39.95
237.25
135.00
135.00
51.81
51.81
135.00
135.00
72.79
65.07
65.07
3,313.85
3,516.78
135.00
135.00
Page: 2
vchlist
07/25/2013 2:36:29PM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 3
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
29817 7/25/2013 003297 HIGGINS, LEVVIS ROD
29818 7/25/2013 002520 HUSKY INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS
29819 7/25/2013 002538 HYDRAULICS PLUS, INC
29820 7/25/2013 002384 IMS INFRASTRUCTURE MGMT. LLC
29821 7/25/2013 003362 INLAND GEAR 22795
22859
29822 7/25/2013 002518 INLAND PACIFIC HOSE& FITINGS 489887
494731
29823 7/25/2013 000265 JACKSON, MIKE
29824 7/25/2013 000864 JUB ENGINEERS INC_
29825 7/25/2013 000662 NAIL BARRICADE&SIGN CO
29826 7/25/2013 001035 NETWORK DESIGN&MANAGEMENT 4239
29827 7/25/2013 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC.
29828 7/25/2013 000307 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER JUNE 2013
3RD QTR 2013
86762
16688
10113-5
3RD QTR 2013
0082587
80457
665248175001
665248190001
Fund/Dept
001.011.000.511
101.000.000.542
101.000.000.542
101.042.000.542
101.000.000.542
101.000.000.542
101.000.000.542
101.000.000.542
001.013.000.513
101.042.000.542
101.042.000.542
001.090.000.518
001.090.000.519
001.090.000.518
001.016.000.586
Description/Account
3RD QTR 2013 CELL PHONE ALLO)
Total :
Total :
Total :
SUPPLIES: PW
REPLACE PUMP
2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PL
Total :
5-206-CLUTCH REPAIR
5-204-REPLACE CLUTCH
Total :
SUPPLIES: PW
SERVICE CHARGE FOR UNPAID IN
Total :
3RD QTR 2013 CELL PHONE ALL())
Total :
TIP DATA MAINTENANCE AND SUP
Total :
SUPPLIES: PW
Total :
MONTHLY SYSTEM MAINTENANCE
Total :
SUPPLIES: IT
SUPPLIES: IT
STATE REMITTANCE
Total :
Amount
135.00
135.00
82.94
82.94
489.15
489.15
5,637.50
5,637.50
1,627.45
1,413.37
3,040.82
39.98
2.14
42.12
135.00
135.00
18,687.90
18,687.90
189.14
189.14
4,475.00
4,475.00
30.97
23.32
54.29
56,570.39
Page: 3
vchlist
0712512013 2:36:29PM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 4
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice
29828 7/25/2013 000307 000307 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURE (Continued)
29829 7/25/2013 001604 PACIFIC NW PAPER 142198
29830 7/25/2013 002424 PITNEY BOWES GLOBAL 1428301-JY13
29831 7/25/2013 000256 RAINBOW ELECTRIC INC 377535
29832 7/25/2013 000031 ROYAL BUSINESS SYSTEMS 144821
29833 7/25/2013 002288 SARGENT ENGINEERS INC, 28632
29834 7/25/2013 000064 SCHIMMELS,GARY 3RD QTR 2013
29835 7/25/2013 001892 SKILLINGS CONNOLLY INC
29836 7/25/2013 003434 SNOOK, KAROL
29837 7/25/2013 000308 SPOKANE CO PROSECUTING ATTY
29838 7/25/2013 000459 SPOKANE CO TITLE CO
29839 7/25/2013 002540 SPOKANE HOUSE OF HOSE INC.
8435
8436
AQUATIC REFUND
JUNE 2013
6-191945-49
6-191950-53
291032
294334
304856
Fund/Dept
001.090.000.519
001.090.000.518
001.090.000.518
001.090.000.518
303.000.175.595
001.011,000.511
303.303.156.595
303.303.149.595
001.076.302.347
001.016.000.586
311.000.180.595
303.303.155.595
101.000.000.542
402.402.000.531
101.042.000.542
Description/Account
PAPER GENERAL USE
POSTAGE METER RENTAL
Total :
Total :
Total :
AIR CONDITIONING CURCUIT
Total :
COPIER SERVICE
Total :
BRIDGE AND STRUCTURAL CONS(
Total :
3RD QTR 2013 CELL PHONE ALLOT
Total :
RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION SERA
10-008 E ON CALL ROW ACQUISITI
Total :
SWIM CLASS REFUND:JOHN
Total :
CRIME VICITIMS COMPENSATION I
Total :
2013 STREET PRESERVATION CIP
W SULLIVAN BRIDGE CIP 0155
Total :
SUPPLIES: PW
SUPPLIES: PW
SUPPLIES: PW
Amount
56,570.39
1,459,84
1,459.84
275.00
275.00
490.24
490.24
103.27
103.27
153.51
153.51
135.00
135.00
649.23
5,770.92
6,420.15
35.00
35.00
825.37
825.37
1,467.45
1,173.96
2,641.41
87.19
63.35
2.05
Page: 4
vchlist
07125/2013 2:36:29PM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 5
Bank code:
Voucher
29839
29840
29841
29842
29843
29844
29845
29846
29847
29848
29849
29850
29851
apbank
Date Vendor Invoice
7/25/2013 002540 002540 SPOKANE HOUSE OF HOSE INC. (Continued)
7/25/2013 000311 SPRINT
7/25/2013 000854 SPW
7/25/2013 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE
7/25/2013 001875 STRATA
7/25/2013 002254 TOWEY,TOM
7/25/2013 001464 TW TELECOM
7/25/2013 000723 US HEALTH WORKS
7/25/2013 000964 VOLT MANAGEMENT CORP
7/25/2013 000980 WESTERN SYSTEMS
7/25/2013 002960 WICK, BEN
7/25/2013 002651 WOODARD,ARNE
7/25/2013 001885 ZAYO GROUP LLC
959698810-068
1419.01
3204171936
3204171937
3204171940
SP130188-N
3RD QTR 2013
05639919
0489220-WA
29549321
0000023756
3RD QTR 2013
3RD QTR 2013
JULY 2013
Fund/Dept
001.058.057.558
303.000.185.595
001.058.055.558
001.058.050.558
001.058.050.558
311.000.174.595
001.011.000.511
001.076.305.575
101.042.000.542
001.090.000.518
303.303.170.595
001.011.000.511
001.011.000.511
001.090.000.518
Description/Account
Amount
GPS PHONE:JULY 2013
APPLEWAY, DORA TO PARK
SUPPLIES: CD
SUPPLIES: CD
SUPPLIES: CD
Total :
Total :
Total :
Total :
0174-2013 STREET PRES MATTE:
Total :
3RD QTR 2013 CELL PHONE ALLO1
Total :
INTERNET/DATA/PHONE LINES:JU
Total :
DOT PHYSICALS: PW
HELP DESK TECH TEMP
Total :
Total :
0170-ARGONNE CONTROLLER CI
Total :
3RD QTR 2013 CELL PHONE ALLOT
Total :
3RD QTR 2013 CELL PHONE ALLO{
Total :
HIGH SPEED INTERNET CITY HALL
152.59
70.10
70.10
828.00
828.00
144.60
110.74
152.64
407.98
11,832.45
11,832.45
135.00
135.00
1,159.12
1,159.12
154.00
154.00
775.20
775.20
8,673.30
8,673.30
135,00
135.00
135.00
135.00
558.38
Page: 5
vchlist
07/25/2013 2:36:29PM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 6
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor
29851 7/25/2013 001885 001885 ZAYO GROUP LLC
29852 7/25/2013 001885 ZAYO GROUP LLC
11629891 7/29/2013 000409 DEPT OF REVENUE
Invoice
(Continued)
JULY 2013 B
2ND QTR 2013
724130007 7/25/2013 002244 AOT PUBLIC SAFETY CORPORATION SPKVLY-43
60 Vouchers for bank code: apbank
60 Vouchers in this report
I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury,
that the materials have been furnished,the services
rendered,or the labor performed as described herein
and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid
obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that
I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim.
Finance Director Date
Mayor Date
Council Member Date
Fund/Dept
101.042.000.542
001.076.302.576
001.016.000.521
Description/Account
DARK FIBER LEASE
Amount
Total : 558.38
410.91
Total : 410.91
COMBINED EXCISE TAX RETURN C
CRYWOLF CHARGES:JUNE
247.35
Total : 247.35
3,362.20
Total : 3,362.20
Bank total : 213,873.75
Total vouchers: 213,873.75
Page: 6
vchlist
08101/2013 3:52:24PM
Voucher List Page: 1
Spokane Valley
Bank code: pk-ref
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
5616 8/1/2013 003450 ADVENT LUTHERAN CHURCH PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT:TERRACE VIE\ 52.00
Total : 52.00
5617 8/1/2013 003456 ANDERSON, LYNETTE PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 SUMMER CAMP REFUND:ANDREV 110.00
Total: 110.00
5618 8/1/2013 003097 CAJIGAS, DENISE PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 SUMMER CAMP ADJUSMENT:CHL 10.00
Total : 10.00
5619 8/1/2013 003454 CAMPANELLA, KATE PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT: DISCOVERY PI 52.00
Total : 52.00
5620 8/1/2013 003453 CENTRAL VALLEY CLASS OF 1962 PARKS REFUND 001237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT:TERRACE VIE\ 52.00
Total : 52.00
5621 8/1/2013 003451 DUNHAM, LINDSEY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 SUMMER CAMP REFUND:AVERY 110.00
Total : 110.00
5622 8/1/2013 003446 DYK, CRYSTAL PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT: DISCOVERY P 52.00
Total : 52.00
5623 8/1/2013 003449 GORDON, KAROLEE PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT:MIRABEAU ME 52.00
Total : 52.00
5624 8/1/2013 003452 JAMES,GAY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 SUMMER CAMP REFUND:ALYSSA 100.00
Total : 100.00
5625 8/1/2013 003448 JOHNSON,GARY PARKS REFUND 001.237,10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT: EDGECLIFF PP 52.00
Total : 52.00
5626 8/1/2013 003444 KING,MELISSA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 REFUND FOR SUMMER CAMP TYS 220.00
Total : 220.00
5627 8/1/2013 003455 MASTER GARDENER FOUNDATION, DEP PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT:MIRABEAU ME 52.00
Total : 52.00
5628 8/1/2013 003457 MILLS, MARKA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT:VALLEY MISSI( 52.00
Page: 1
vchlist
08/01/2013 3:52:24PM
Voucher List Page: 2
Spokane Valley
Bank code: pk-ref
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
5628 8/1/2013 003457 003457 MILLS, MARKA (Continued) Total : 52.00
5629 8/1/2013 003350 OVNICEK,CHRISTY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT: BROWNS PARI 52.00
Total : 52.00
5630 8/1/2013 002432 RAPP, DAVID PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT:BROWNS PARI 52.00
Total : 52.00
5631 8/1/2013 000064 SCHIMMELS,GARY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND:TERR 52.00
Total: 52.00
5632 8/1/2013 003439 SCHMIDT, MARY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 CANCELAT1ON OF RENTAL MIRABE 136.00
Total : 136.00
5633 8/1/2013 001186 SCHOONOVER, KIM PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 SUMMER CAMP REFUND:CARSOP 120.00
Total : 120.00
5634 8/1/2013 002025 SORG, STACEY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRA 52.00
Total : 52.00
5635 8/1/2013 003175 VISIT SPOKANE PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT: ROOM 109 52.00
Total : 52.00
5636 8/1/2013 003447 WINT,JULIE PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT: EDGECLIFF P/1 52.00
Total : 52.00
5637 8/1/2013 003445 ZANOL, KEN PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 SUMMER CAMP REFUND FOR CAF 100.00
Total: 100.00
22 Vouchers for bank code: pk-ref Bank total : 1,634.00
22 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 1,634.00
Page: 2
vch l ist
0810112013 3:36:19PM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 1
Bank code: apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
29853
29854
8/1/2013 002816 ABLE CLEAN-UP TECHNOLOGIES
8/1/2013 000863 CENTURY WEST ENG CORP
29855 8/1/2013 002604 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC
29856 8/1/2013 002385 DKS ASSOCIATES
29857 8/1/2013 001926 FARR, SARAH
29858 8/1/2013 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC
29859 8/1/2013 002568 GRANICUS INC
29860 8/1/2013 000002 H&H BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC.
29861 8/1/2013 001728 HP FINANCIAL SERVICES CO
29862 8/1/2013 003438 J&S PLUMBING
Fund/Dept Description/Account
15320 001.058.056.524 13157 INSTALL FENCING
233769
233769
76757031
0052536
EXPENSE
40328
46934
110013
600377873
600377874
60077752
BLD-2013-1421
29863 8/1/2013 000635 KUHTA,SCOTT EXPENSE
311.000.180.595
303.303.149.595
001.090.000.548
303.303.14Z 595
001.018.014.514
Total :
180-ON CALL ENGINEERING TASI
149-ON CALL ENGINEERING TASI
Total :
LEASE CONTRACT 001-8922117-0C
Total:
ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES
Total:
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
001.058.056 558 LEGAL PUBLICATION
001.011.000.511
001.058.050.558
001.090.000.548
001.090.000.548
001.090.000.548
001.058.059.322
001.058.056.558
BROADCASTING SERVICES
SERVICE FOR CD COPIER
Total :
Total:
Total :
Total :
SCHEDULE 572DA494:8/19-9/18/1::
SCHEDULE 572DD016:8111-911011:
SCHEDULE 572D81DD:817-916113
Total :
MECHANICAL PERMIT REFUND DL
Total :
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
Total :
Amount
2,244.66
2,244.66
2,569.50
3,049.14
5,618.64
1,087.48
1,087.48
15,247.94
15,247.94
42.38
42.38
107.20
107.20
719.59
719.59
106.34
106.34
839.80
745.84
550.02
2,135.66
117.00
117,00
372.57
372.57
Page: 1
vchlist
08/01/2013 3:36:19PM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 2
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
29864 8/1/2013 003266 MCEUEN,SUSAN
29865 8/1/2013 000824 MCTRANS CENTER, UNIVERSITY OF FLI E84178
CRYWOLF
29866 8/1/2013 003251 MDI MARKETING 9694
29867 8/1/2013 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 663768400001
666991718001
668306733001
668306770001
29868 8/1/2013 003437 OLDFIELD, KAREN
29869 8/1/2013 003230 POOL WORLD, INC
29870 8/1/2013 000019 PURRFECT LOGOS INC.
29871 8/1/2013 000235 SECURE SHRED
29872 8/1/2013 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER
29873 8/1/2013 001875 STRATA
29874 8/1/2013 002254 TOWEY,TOM
CRYWOLF
BLD-2012-1324
31739
92143
51501694
934401859
934401875
SP 130190-IN
EXPENSE
Fund/Dept
001.000.000.342
101.042.000.594
001.090.000.558
001.076.301.571
001.018.013.513
001.018.014.514
001.018.014.514
001.000.000242
001.058.059.345
001.011.000.511
001.090.000.518
001.016.000.523
001.016.000.521
001.016.000.521
303.303.061.595
001.011.000.511
Description/Account
Amount
FALSE ALARM REFUND: PERMIT V
Total :
HCS ANNUAL SUPPORT SUBSCRIF
Total :
JUNE 2013 ADVERTISEMENTS
Total :
SUPPLIES: PARKS&REC
SUPPLIES: FRONT DESK
SUPPLIES: FINANCE
SUPPLIES: IT
Total :
FALSE ALARM REFUND: PERMIT V
Total :
REFUND OF SWIMMING POOL PEF
Total :
ROD HIGGINS MAGNETS
DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION
Total :
Total :
JUNE 2013 HOUSING INVOICE
IMPAIRED DRIVING JUNE 2013
IMPAIRED DRIVING 6/13-7/13
Total :
0061 -CN MATERIALS TESTING
Total :
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
Total :
25.00
25.00
400.00
400.00
27,186.60
27,186.60
54.85
60A3
161.33
15.70
292.31
15.00
15.00
349,56
349.56
23,91
23.91
165.30
16520
106,447.00
662.53
1,842.11
108,951.64
1,431.32
1,43122
65.01
65.01
Page: 2
vch l ist
08/01/2013 3:36:19PM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 3
Bank code: apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
invoice
29875 8/1/2013 000087 VERIZON WIRELESS
29876 8/1/2013 000964 VOLT MANAGEMENT CORP
29877 8/1/2013 003436 WALLACE,JENNA
731130035 7/31/2013 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER
26 Vouchers for bank code: apbank
26 Vouchers in this report
I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury,
that the materials have been furnished,the services
rendered,or the labor performed as described herein
and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid
obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that
I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim.
Finance Director Date
Mayor Date
Council Member Date
9708409144
9708410416
9708414659
9708528304
29579070
AQUATIC REFUND
9290200485
Fund/Dept
001.016.000.521
001.016.000.521
101.042.000.542
101.042.000.542
001.090.000.518
001.076.302.347
001.016.000.521
Description/Account
AIR CARD FOR POLICE CHEIF
AIR CARDS FOR POLICE DEPARTh
JULY 2013 VERIZON CELL PHONE;
JULY 2013 WIRELESS DATA CARD:
Total :
HELP DESK TECH TEMP
Total :
REFUND MICHELLE BROKE FINGE
Total :
LAW ENFORCEMENT
Total :
Bank total :
Total vouchers:
Amount
40.01
803.20
1,090.99
465.48
2,399.68
573.11
573.11
35.00
35.00
1,529,813.00
1,529,813.00
1,699,525.90
1,699,525.90
Page: 3
vchlist
08/0212013 1:16:32PM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 1
Bank code:
Voucher
apbank
Date Vendor
Invoice
29878 8/2/2013 001606 BANNER BANK
29879 8/2/2013 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC
29880 8/2/2013 000326 CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION#19
29881 81212013 003136 GIBSON, CARLY
29882 8/2/2013 000011 GREATER SPOKANE VALLEY
29883 8/2/2013 001635 ISS FACILITY/EVENT SERVICES
29884 8/2/2013 001684 MARKETING SOLUTIONS NW
0797
1423
2223
4064
4375
8861
9454214
S0059213
S0059517
S0059552
July 2013
Expenses
2013
625108
627131
#CP 7.22.13-Prod
29885 8/2/2013 000193 NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC 2nd Qtr 2013 CAM
August 2013
29886
812/2013 001860 PLATT
Fund/Dept
001.011.000.511
105.000.000.557
001.013,000.513
001.058.057.558
001.011.000.511
001.076.305,575
001.076.305.575
001.076.305.575
001.076.305.575
001.076.305.575
Description/Account
JUNE 2013:0797
JUNE 2013: 1423
JUNE 2013:7773
JUNE 2013:4064
JUNE 2013:4375
JUNE 2013:8861
Total:
LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT C
LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLYATC
LINEN SUPPLY AND SERVICE AT C
LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT C
Total:
001.076.300.576 UTILITIES:PARKS
Total:
001,018.014,514 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
Total:
001.090.000.550 2013 OUTSIDE AGENCY: ECO DEV
Total :
001.076.305.575
001.076.305.575
EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLAC
JULY 2013 MONTHLY CLEANING CI
Total :
001.076.305.575 AGENCY PLANNING/PRODUCITON
Total :
001.090.000.518
001.090.000.518
2ND QTR 2013 CAM CHARGES
CITY HALL RENT
Total
5338719 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE
Total :
Amount
3,009.19
924.48
1,014.58
556.26
448.81
1,277.03
7,230.35
163.52
163.76
26.93
117.57
471.78
799,51
799.51
11.30
11.30
300.00
300.00
84.28
7,136.00
7,220.28
1,577.00
1,577.00
738.28
33,333.33
34,071.61
105.56
105.56
Page: 1
vchlist
08/02/2013 1:16:32PM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 2
Bank code: apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
29887 8/2/2013 000291 PROJECTACCESS INC.
29888 8/2/2013 000019 PURRFECT LOGOS INC.
29889 8/2/2013 000415 ROSAUERS
29890
29891
29892
29893
29894
29895
29896
29897
8/2/2013 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST#3
2013-101
31679
31699
679777
696504
696505
July 2013
8/2/2013 000451 SPOKANE REG SPORTS COMMISSION August 2013
8/2/2013 000420 SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DIST 58-8353
58-8354
8/2/2013 000854 SPVV
8/2/2013 000773 STUDIO CASCADE INC.
8/2/2013 001911 THE GLOVER MANSION
8/2/2013 000295 VALLEYFEST
1350.07
1837
C P899
1013
8/2/2013 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 1868422-2681-3
1868721-2681-5
Fund/Dept
001.090.000.560
001.076.301.571
001.076.300.576
001.076.301.571
001.076.301.571
001.076.301.571
001.076.300.576
105.000.000.557
001.076.302.576
001.076.300.576
001.076.300.576
001.076.000.576
001.076.305.575
001.076.301.571
001.016.000.521
001.076.305.575
Description/Account
Amount
2ND QTR REIMBURSE: OUTSIDE A
Total:
BANENRS FOR PARKS AND REC
SIGNS FOR PARKS
Total:
SUPPLIES FOR REC PROGRAMS
SUPPLIES FOR REC PROGRAMS
SUMMER DAY CAMP SUPPLIES
Total:
WATER CHARGES: PARK ROAD PC
Total :
2ND QTR 2013 LODGING TAX REIN
Total:
INSPECTION FEES FOR TERRACE
INSPECTION FEES FOR GREENAC
Total :
CENTERPLACE SOUTH LANDSCAF
Total :
PLANNING SUPPORT SERVICES
Total :
EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLAt
Total:
ADVERTISING IN VALLEYFEST PUE
Total :
WASTE MANAGEMENT: PRECINCT
WASTE MGMT:CENTERPLACE
Total:
4,592.00
4,592.00
269.58
39.13
308.71
22.17
17.16
10.58
49.91
470.20
470.20
37,500.00
37,500.00
190.00
190.00
380.00
650.00
650.00
1,625.00
1,625.00
45.27
45.27
225.00
225.00
284.00
746.49
1,030.49
Page: 2
vchlist
08/02/2013 1:16:32PM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 3
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice
29898 8/2/2013 000487 YMCA OF THE INLAND NW
21 Vouchers for bank code: apbank
21 Vouchers in this report
I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury,
that the materials have been furnished,the services
rendered,or the labor performed as described herein
and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid
obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that
I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim.
Finance Director Date
Mayor Date
Council Member Date
July 2013
Fund/Dept
001.076.302.576
Description/Account
OPERATING EXPENSES:WAGES C
Total:
Bank total :
Total vouchers:
Amount
44,268.00
44,268.00
142,931.97
142,931.97
Page: 3
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 08-13-2013 Department Director Approval : ❑
Item: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Payroll for Period Ending July 31, 2013
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND:
OPTIONS:
Budget/Financial impacts:
Employees Council Total
Gross: $ 274,018.42 $ 5,475.00 $279,493.42
Benefits: $ 147,362.59 $ 9,133.93 $156,496.52
Total payroll $ 421,381.01 $ 14,608.93 $435,989.94
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Approve Payroll
STAFF CONTACT: Raba Nimri
Draft
MINUTES
City of Spokane Valley
City Council Regular Meeting
Formal Meeting Format
Tuesday,July 23,2013
Mayor Towey called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
Attendance: City Staff:
Tom Towey,Mayor Mike Jackson,City Manager
Gary Schimmels,Deputy Mayor Cary Driskell,City Attorney
Dean Grafos, Councilmember Erik Lamb,Deputy City Attorney
Chuck Hafner, Councilmember Mike Stone,Parks&Rec Director
Rod Higgins, Councilmember John Hohman, Community Dev Director
Ben Wick, Councilmember Eric Guth,Public Works Director
Arne Woodard, Councilmember Mark Calhoun,Finance Director
Marty Palaniuk,Planner
Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk
INVOCATION: Pastor Mike Graef,Valley United Methodist Church gave the invocation.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Towey led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously
agreed to approve the agenda.
INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS:
COMMITTEE,BOARD,LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS:
Councilmember Hafner:reported that he attended a SCOPE Leadership meeting and picnic.
Councilmember Higgins: no report
Deputy Mayor Schimmels: said he attended the "Phillips 66 Spokane Terminal Star Celebration"
recognizing their volunteers who have shown their commitment to employee protection.
Councilmember Grafos: said he toured the Sunshine Solid Waste Disposal Facility.
Councilmember Wick: mentioned the upcoming Cycle Celebration this Sunday.
Councilmember Woodard: no report.
MAYOR'S REPORT: Mayor Towey reported that he attended the Northeast Mayor's Meeting where
Mr. Hohman gave a presentation about our permitting process; said he attended the Spokane Valley
Veteran's Center where World War II Veteran Del Casper, an Army Air Corps Veteran, was honored 70
years after the War, and where Honorary Consul to France From Washington State, awarded Mr. Casper
with the French Legion of Honor Medal. Mayor Towey said he returned to the Veteran's Center again for
the 20th annual Women's Recognition Day.Mayor Towey reported that he also met with Spokane County
Commissioner Chair Shelly 0'Quinn.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mayor Towey invited public comments.
Don Meier, 3910 S Eagle Lane and Gerald Snow, 3938 S Eagle Lane spoke, with Mr. Meier speaking
first concerning the Painted Hill Trustee Sale; they both urged the City to move forward to purchase the
golf course; said this is a great opportunity to purchase a fully developed golf course; said we should
Council Regular Meeting 07-23-2013 Page 1 of 4
Approved by Council:
Draft
purchase this to preserve the quality of life now enjoyed within our City; and should take action prior to
the September 13 trustee sale at the County Courthouse.
1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any
member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered
separately.
a.Approval of the following claim vouchers:
VOUCHER LIST VOUCHER NUMBERS TOTAL AMOUNT
07/03/2013 5590-5605 $1,164.00
07/03/2013 29579-29599 $41,923.18
07/03/2013 29600-29627 $113,276.59
07/08/2013 29629 $404.96
07/10/2013 4375,4399-4402;4419; 29630-29634 $276,264.84
07/12/2013 29635-29671 $142,477.99
07/12/2013 29672-29734; 705130017 $1,657,588.74
07/15/2013 5606-5615 $892.00
GRAND TOTAL $2,233,992.30
b.Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending July 15,2013: $303,929.95
c.Approval of June 18,2013 Council Workshop Meeting Minutes
d.Approval of July 2,2013 Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session Format
e.Approval of July 9,2013 Council Meeting Minutes,Formal Meeting Format
f.Approval of July 16,2013 Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session Format
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the Consent
Agenda.
NEW BUSINESS:
2.First Reading Proposed Ordinance 13-010, Sign Code Revisions—John Hohman
After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and
seconded to advance Ordinance 13-010, City Initiated Amendment CTA 2013-0004, sign regulation
amendments, to a second reading. Community Development Director Hohman went over the highlights
of the code changes, which he said were initiated to provide flexibility to the regulations while keeping
consistent with the Cities of Spokane and Cheney. Mayor Towey invited public comments; no comments
were offered. Councilmember Wick voiced his opinion at keeping the temporary signs to one, adding that
he realized he was in the minority. Vote by Acclamation:In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion
carried.
3.First Reading Proposed Ordinance 13-011,Zayo Franchise—Cary Driskell
After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and
seconded to advance Ordinance 13-011, granting a telecommunications franchise to Zayo, to a second
reading. City Attorney Driskell displayed the route map on the screens; said this franchise has been
discussed previously, that it would be a renewal similar to other franchises, and would also be for a ten-
year period. Mayor Towey invited public comments; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation:
In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:Mayor Towey invited public comments.No comments were offered.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS:
4. Geology of Mirabeau Point Park—Mike Stone,Andy Buddington
Parks and Recreation Director Stone introduced Mr. Andy Buddington, Spokane Community College
Earth-Science Instructor, whom Mr. Stone explained has formed an alliance with him to examine
Council Regular Meeting 07-23-2013 Page 2 of 4
Approved by Council:
Draft
Mirabeau Park natural history; and said the project Mr. Buddington is about to describe, is an
undergraduate service-learning research project, and was conceived as a cooperative between the City of
Spokane Valley and the Spokane Community College. Mr. Buddington went through his PowerPoint
presentation showing various examples of the natural history contained at Mirabeau Park, including areas
of bedrock, and boulders brought into the area as a result of the Missoula flood that occurred at the end of
the last ice age; natural potholes, and the beautiful waterfall. Mayor Towey thanked Mr. Buddington for
an informative report.
5.Lighting Code Revisions—Marty Palaniuk
Planner Palaniuk gave the history of the proposed amendments to the lighting regulations, and then
briefly explained those changes, which include eliminating redundant references, height restrictions,
requirement for a lighting plan,and the watts per square foot standard as a means to limit luminosity; and
establishes two new outdoor lighting exemptions. Mr. Palaniuk also explained that these amendments
would not apply to one and two-family dwellings, or to public street lighting. There were no objections
to moving this forward to a first reading.
6. Council Goals for 2014—Mike Jackson
City Manager Jackson said that this topic is typically handled during the summer retreat/workshop, but
was postponed in the interest of time; that tonight represents the "first touch" for eventual 2014 Council
Goals; he said there will be subsequent discussions with the goals ultimately being adopted by Council as
part of the 2014 budget. To start the discussion, Mr. Jackson went over the current 2013 budget goals.
Mr. Jackson mentioned today's newspaper article concerning Spokane's discharge permit under appeal,
wherein the article said the permit is now "compromised" and he said therefore, the County will have
another thirty days in which to appeal. After discussion on this goal, it was decided to omit most of the
verbiage so that the goal would be written as "Continue to monitor the discharge permit process for the
Spokane County wastewater treatment plant." Mr. Jackson noted that Mr. Hohman will make a
presentation to council next week concerning the floodplain study. There was some Council discussion
regarding prioritizing the goals, and it was decided that the idea is not to prioritize goals,but to have them
listed in no particular order.
The next goal of solid waste was discussed, with mention by Mr. Jackson of an upcoming meeting this
Thursday to conduct a first review of the consultant's report; he said after that meeting work will begin on
the Performa to include actual annual costs; and said all data will be released to elected officials in
August. It was suggested to keep the goal but to re-word it to include mention of alternatives for
collection, transport and disposal. It was decided to remove the goal of developing a shoreline master
program since that program is scheduled for completion this year. The goal concerning a legislative
capital budget request was discussed and it was decided since a decision must be made by November
concerning the Sullivan Bridge,to remove that part of the goal. After further discussion it was decided to
include such things as seeking budget requests or funding for the Appleway Trail project, parkland
acquisition, the Barker Road grade separation, and purchase of a transfer station. Mr. Jackson also noted
he has not seen any grants thus far that might assist with the Appleway Trail project. The goal concerning
creating an economic development plan was discussed and Mr. Jackson stated that Mr. Hohman will also
give an update next week on this topic; he said the short term goals of the ad hoc committee have been
implemented, and concerning regional tourism partners, said we continue to work with such entities as
GSI (Greater Spokane, Inc.) and Visit Spokane and funding through the Lodging Tax process. It was
decided to edit the goal slightly to "continue and expand" an economic development plan. Mr. Jackson
said we have much to take care of now, and that during 2014 we could work on a scope of work for an
economic development plan to take place in 2015; and Councilmember Grafos agreed that we are not
ready to formalize a plan and should have a"better picture" in another year. Mr. Jackson asked Council
if they had any other goals they wished to include. After discussion, it was decided to include a goal of
Council Regular Meeting 07-23-2013 Page 3 of 4
Approved by Council:
Draft
focusing on sustainability of the street preservation program beyond 2016, and to evaluate the law
enforcement needs. Mr.Jackson said he will put together another draft for future discussion.
Mayor Towey called for a recess at 7:30 p.m., and reconvened the meeting at 7:40 p.m.
7.WUTC Grade Crossing Protective Fund,Railroad Safety Improvement Grants—Eric Guth
Public Works Director Guth explained that the Washington State Utilities and Transportation
Commission (WUTC) through its Grade Crossing Protective Fund has an open call for projects for
railroad safety improvement grants of up to $20,000 per project; he said the grants are for projects to
eliminate or mitigate public safety hazards at railroad crossings and along railroad rights-of-way. Mr.
Guth explained that a citizen contacted the City regarding the Vista Road/Trent Avenue crossing for the
BNSF Railroad; he said staff checked with WUTC and they suggested the crossing at Vista would be a
strong candidate for safety funding; he also noted that BNSF has recorded six close calls at this location
over the past five years from vehicles driving around down crossing gates as trains approached. Mr. Guth
further explained that this crossing has two main lines so it would be a possible total of$40,000 in grant
funds. Director Guth said that these grants are 100% funded up to the maximum amount if design and
construction management is contracted out; and based on the current preliminary estimate,the City match
would be approximately $11,000, and he proposed using REET funds to provide that match. Mr. Guth
said this would be a quick turnaround as the project would be designed this fall and winter and put out to
bid in spring for a spring project. Councilmember Wick asked if we are designing those improvements to
meet the criteria for quiet zones and Mr. Guth said he would have to research that. Mr. Guth
recommended staff bring this issue to Council at next week's Council meeting as a motion consideration,
and there were no objections.
8.Advance Agenda—Mayor Towey There were no suggested changes to the advance agenda.
INFORMATION ONLY Item #8 Department Reports; #10 Planning Commission Minutes; and #11
Justice Assistance Grant were for information only and were not reported or discussed.
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS Mr. Jackson had no comments.
12.EXECUTIVE SESSION: Pending/Potential Litigation; and Potential Acquisition of Real Estate
[RCW 42.30.110(1)(1)]; and RCW 42.30.110(1)(b)]
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn into executive
session for approximately thirty minutes to discuss pending/potential litigation and potential land
acquisition, and that no action would be taken upon return to open session. Council adjourned into
Executive Session at 7:51 p.m. At approximately 8:12 p.m., Mayor Towey declared Council out of
Executive Session. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to
adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at 8:12 p.m.
ATTEST:
Thomas E.Towey,Mayor
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
Council Regular Meeting 07-23-2013 Page 4 of 4
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
MINUTES
SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
STUDY SESSION FORMAT
Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers
Spokane Valley,Washington
July 30,2013 6:00 p.m.
Attendance:
Councilmembers Staff
Tom Towey,Mayor Mike Jackson,City Manager
Gary Schimmels,Deputy Mayor Cary Driskell, City Attorney
Dean Grafos,Councilmember Erik Lamb,Deputy City Attorney
Chuck Hafner, Councilmember Mark Calhoun,Finance Director
Rod Higgins, Councilmember Mike Stone,Parks&Recreation Director
Ben Wick, Councilmember Eric Guth,Public Works Director
Arne Woodard, Councilmember John Hohman,Community Development Dir
Gabe Gallinger, Senior Development Engineer
Scott Kuhta,Planning Manager
Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk
Mayor Towey called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. and announced that there will be an Executive
Session at the end of tonight's meeting.
Roll Call: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present.
ACTION ITEMS:
1.Approval to Submit WUTC Grant Application—Eric Guth
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to approve the Vista Road/Trent Avenue BNSF
Railroad crossing for a WUTC grant application as presented. Public Works Director Guth explained
that the Washington State Utilities and Transportation Commission (WUTC) issued a call for projects for
railroad safety improvement grants of up to $20,000 per project; and that he suggests applying for a grant
for the Vista Road/Trent Avenue crossing which is made up of two crossings so we could be eligible for
up to $40,000 total. Mr. Guth said that although the grant pays 100%of the total cost up to the maximum
grant amount if design and construction management is contracted out, based upon the current
preliminary estimate, the City match would be approximately $11,000; and said if funded, he proposes
using REET(real estate excise tax) funds to provide that match. Mr. Guth noted that there was a question
at the last meeting concerning quiet zones and he said this project would not prohibit that should it be
desired in the future. Mayor Towey invited public comments; no comments were offered. Vote by
Acclamation:In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried.
2.Approval to Submit TIB Grant Application—Eric Guth/Steve Worley
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to authorize staff to submit 2013 TIB Grant
applications for the Broadway Avenue Improvement Project, the 32nd Avenue Sidewalk Project, and the
Indiana Avenue Sidewalk Project as presented. Mr. Guth explained that after this issue was discussed at
the previous Council meeting, staff conducted further research as noted in the accompanying
memorandums, and it was determined that the Mission Avenue improvements project as well as the
Sprague Avenue lane reduction should not be recommended for these grants; that staff recommends
waiting until the final design of Mission Avenue has been developed with the involvement of the
Greenacres Neighborhood; and that the Sprague Avenue lane reduction project be developed more prior
to applying for grant funding, as there were few elements of this project that would score well according
Council Study Session Minutes 07-30-2013 Page 1 of 5
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
to the TIB's scoring criteria. Mr. Guth further explained that staff recommends the Sullivan Road
sidewalk project also not move forward since this project involves a significant amount of right-of-way
and the cost of acquiring that is not eligible for reimbursement under the TIB Sidewalk Program.
Therefore, Mr. Guth said staff recommends moving forward for TIB grant applications for the Broadway
Avenue Improvement Project, the 32nd Avenue Sidewalk Project, and the Indiana Avenue Sidewalk
project. Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In
Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried.
NON-ACTION ITEMS:
3. Park/Library Project Update—Mike Stone
Parks and Recreation Director Stone introduced Gary Bernardo,Bill Lame, and Dell Hatch,members of
consultant team from Bernardo Wills Architects. Mr. Stone said a third and final public meeting will be
held September 12, from 4 to 6 p.m., and the intent is to have the meeting on-site so members of the
community can see the layout of the various elements of the park, and so we and representatives from the
Library can get final feedback. Mr. Bernardo spoke about the three options which were developed in
preparation for the second meeting, and that after those options were reviewed, said the consensus was
that option A was the preferred option. The team went through the PowerPoint explaining their mission
statement, showing the aerial view of the site, along with slides showing the conceptual site plan of the
park and library, including some of the components such as a stage, veterans' memorial, reading garden,
and amphitheater. Parking was also discussed and the idea of parking on both sides of the library was
mentioned. Mr. Hatch reminded everyone that this plan is still conceptual, and that they expect their
survey to be complete within the next few days; he said the steering committee met this month and
discussed how to develop the plan and that the committee will meet again in a few weeks, with the hope
to have a complete plan in November, and then final presentation to Council. Councilmember Woodard
asked if there would be a benefit to have the road two-way just to Herald, and Mr.Bernardo said that was
not studied as that issue is beyond what they were asked to do. Mr. Hatch also mentioned that they met
with representatives from the Fire Department concerning their means of exit from the fire station.
4. Economic Development Update—John Hohman
Community Development Director introduced Senior Planner Basinger, and reported that Mr. Basinger
has been selected as the Economic Development Coordinator, and that it will be Mr. Basinger's job to
pull the items of the work program together. As a refresher, Mr. Hohman went through the PowerPoint
presentation explaining the activities staff has worked on since last March; adding that Mr. Basinger
developed an application which has been sent out to key stakeholders for review; and that one of the goals
is to have the certified sites program completed by the end of August.As shown on slide #8,Mr.Basinger
explained the work program and what it would entail; he said staff is looking at the industrial properties
as explained a few weeks ago, and said they have identified the portions of the industrial property that
have sewer; he said he feels it could be a great economic stimulus to offer some of the needed
infrastructure for that area; he said they are also working on the certified site program and want to
simplify the process and work with the property owners to reach their goal; he said they identified one of
the issues for them is looking at it as a marketing program; said some stakeholders felt it should not be
limited but should be offered to anyone who can use it; he said they are coordinating these issues with the
program partners and want to make sure they are promoting Spokane Valley; and again stated staff wants
to market some of the projects we have for the City to make it easy to understand what and why we do
what we do, and to get people involved. Mr. Basinger added he wants to look at the census data and
compile demographic information as well as socioeconomic status data. Mr. Hohman asked Council if
there is anything else they would like to see or move forward; and said he feels this work plan has many
elements and staff will spend dedicated time to complete some of these tasks. Council comments included
congratulations to Mr. Basinger on his new appointment; that they are encouraged by the process;that we
are a City of great potential and we need to do more marketing to publicize that message.
Council Study Session Minutes 07-30-2013 Page 2 of 5
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
5. Industrial Land Sewer—John Hohman, Gabe Gallinger
Community Development Director Hohman said that this agenda item is a continuation on the issue
briefly discussed by Mr. Basinger a few weeks ago; and said staff spent a lot of time over the last few
months coordinating with landowners and developers and Spokane County Utilities about what it would
take to open this area for development. Mr. Hohman said they want to as much as possible, keep the
amount of infrastructure to a minimum; that they are not proposing to extend any sewer on Flora. Mr.
Gallinger explained the phased approach as noted on slides seven through ten; said we don't need to do it
all at once, and recommended splitting the costs into thirds. Mr. Hohman said staff will continue to work
with potential private partners, and said we don't want to move forward without certainty that
development will occur; that there is a lot of potential, and staff will bring updates to Council as they
become available.
Mayor Towey called for a recess at 7:30 p.m., and reconvened the meeting at 7:40 p.m.
6. Spokane County Saltese Wetlands Restoration—John Hohman, Gabe Gallinger
Community Development Director Hohman gave a brief history of the County's ongoing wetland
restoration project and proposed floodplain restudy of the Saltese Flats/Shelley Lake area; said this was
initiated by Spokane County Utilities and that we operate in the review capacity of floodplain
administrators for our City; he said we have worked very closely over the last two years to operate as a
team to review this as part of the ongoing sewer needs; he said the decision last week concerning the
discharge permit into the River confirmed almost everything on the permit except for some added detail
that the Department of Ecology will have to look at. City Manager Jackson said he spoke with Kevin
Cooke and they are happy with the decision that allows the discharge; that the Saltese Flats idea could
have been a secondary location for discharge, but there are no concrete plans on that, but that tonight we
will explain how our staff has been involved.
Mr. Gallinger explained that we have not been involved in the design or even the review exclusively in
the County and outside our city limits; and Mr. Hohman added that when we perform a flood study, the
few components we work on include how much water will be developed and then we bring in the
mapping component, and said without completing and validating and calibrating the hydrology, which
information we don't yet have,we can't do the next step.Mr.Hohman said he can get the actual list of the
various steps required for Council,but it will take some time,noting that there are also appeal periods; he
said this is the exact process used with Chester Creek where the initial map showed flooding well beyond
what we thought was reasonable; then the City identified every drywell in the vicinity of the floodplain,
and cleaned and tested the drywells and provided the information to West Consultants, which Mr.
Hohman explained, is why the floodplain map was reduced in that location; he said that is how the
process should proceed, and said we have a long way to go to get the approved map. Mr. Hohman also
noted that this part just includes the existing conditions and they have not reviewed what could happen
when the County introduces wastewater; adding that this is just a very early look at initial conditions, and
said there are a lot of constraints the County would have to comply with and those have not been looked
at in detail as they are outside our jurisdiction. Mr. Hohman said we want to make sure our residents are
not impacted negatively.
7.Appleway Landscaping Phase I—Eric Guth
Mr. Guth gave the history of this project, as noted in his Request for Council Action dated July 30, 2013;
and then via his PowerPoint presentation explained that this deals with the preliminary design of
Appleway Landscaping Phase 1, which includes Dora to Park Road. Director Guth explained that the
planning level construction cost is estimated at $210,000, and that Council concurred for the design work
to start on Phase 1. Mr. Guth said that the project is in progress and that we have an agreement with
SPVV Landscape Architects, and he showed depictions of the existing area compared with the proposed
landscaped area; he briefly discussed the project's west and east halfs depicting the existing landscaping,
Council Study Session Minutes 07-30-2013 Page 3 of 5
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
irrigation crossings, and proposed improvements; showed a diagram of a typical cross-section area with
swales; and mentioned the plan to replace broken PVC pipe with ductile iron, and said the preliminary
cost estimate for 30% design construction is $260,000, which includes 30% contingency. Mr. Guth said
the next steps include updating the design to 60%, contacting the property owners along the corridor,
finalizing the bid package and cost estimate, and then Council consideration of adoption of the
construction funding for the 2014 budget.
8. Initiative 502 Update—Erik Lamb, Scott Kuhta
Deputy City Attorney Lamb stated that since the passage of Initiative 502, the Liquor Control Board has
initiated proposed rules which staff is analyzing so implementation can begin. Mr. Lamb explained that
recreational marijuana is the focus, that the Liquor Control Board continues their rulemaking process
which will include a public hearing, and that the Board expects the rules to be effective September 16,
after which they will begin accepting applications, and that they anticipate issuing licenses in December
or January. Through their PowerPoint presentation, Mr. Lamb explained the definitions of a marijuana
producer, processor, and retailer, and said concerning zoning, that no licensed marijuana facilities or
advertising may be done within 1,000 feet of certain establishments, including schools, playgrounds,
recreation centers, child care centers, public parks, libraries, or game arcades. Mr. Kuhta added that staff
has received several inquiries from individuals questioning where they could place their business, but
explained that we don't have the specific marijuana laws yet in our Code,but Council can establish those
laws if they desire. Mr. Lamb added that we have made administrative determinations about where
marijuana can be processed, sold or grown, and to eliminate confusion for these new possible uses, he
said staff recommends amending our permitted use matrix to provide for the four license types; he said
the process would go through the Planning Commission as usual and then to Council. Concerning
medical marijuana,Mr. Lamb said that is not subject to the 1,000 foot buffer or the Liquor Control Board
licensing, and said we have had no complaints about existing providers; but he added that we still have
not received any indication from the federal government on what they would do with either recreational
or medical marijuana; that it is his understanding a medical dispensary on the West side of the state was
raided. Mr. Lamb said staff is not recommending anything concerned with medical marijuana. Mr. Lamb
asked for a consensus from Council concerning whether staff should move this to the Planning
Commission, continue to wait to gather more information, or use the current zoning regulations. Mayor
Towey stated that being proactive would clarify the issue for those who wanted to pursue this; and
Councilmembers apparently nodded in agreement. Mr. Kuhta added that as for a typical code text
amendment, this would allow the Planning Commission to make recommendations, and then Council
could look at the matrix with flexibility to either restrict or expand as they feel best for the community.
9.Advance Agenda—Mayor Towey
There were no suggested changes to the Advance Agenda, and Mayor Towey reminded everyone that
next week's Council meeting has been cancelled so Councilmembers can participate in "National Night
Out."
10. Information Items of(a) Police Department Monthly, (b) Upcoming Public Works Projects Bids, (c)
Street Vacation STV 2013-0001, (d) Draft 2014 Council Goals, and(3) Ops & Admin Quarterly Report
were for information only and were not reported or discussed.
11. Council Check-in-Mayor Towey
Councilmember Grafos said a citizen informed him of a problem near Savage Land Pizza on Dishman
Road and 12th, as that area is a dark dead-end street and he would like the Police Chief to look into the
possibility of putting in a streetlight at the trailhead at the end of the street. Mr. Jackson said that street
lights are coordinated by our public works department and the Police Department, and said he will check
into that possibility, and report back to Council.
Council Study Session Minutes 07-30-2013 Page 4 of 5
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
12. City Manager Comments—Mike Jackson
Mr. Jackson mentioned Council's legislative agenda and our City's former request to increase the level of
liens when dealing with nuisance abatement cases when the City spent funds; which legislation did not
pass. Mr. Jackson said AWC (Association of Washington Cities) would like to put together a list of
priorities within the next few days and he asked Council if they had any objection to him advancing that
former request. No objections were noted.
EXECUTIVE SESSION: It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed
to adjourn into Executive Session for approximately forty-five minutes to discuss potential land
acquisition, and that no action would be taken upon return to open session. Council adjourned into
Executive Session at 8:49 p.m.
At approximately 9:52 p.m., Mayor Towey declared Council out of Executive Session. It was moved by
Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at
approximately 9:53 p.m.
ATTEST:
Thomas E. Towey,Mayor
Christine Bainbridge,City Clerk
Council Study Session Minutes 07-30-2013 Page 5 of 5
Approved by Council:
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: August 13,2013 Department Head:
Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin.report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Resolution setting a date for a Public Hearing before the Planning
Commission —request the vacation of an unimproved, half-width, right-of-way of Alki Avenue (81 feet
in length by 19 feet wide with 50 foot radius cul-de-sac at the terminus).
BACKGROUND: The applicant, Mike Silvey, on behalf of Evergreen & Valleyway, LLC,requests the
vacation of an unimproved, half-width, right-of-way section of Alki Avenue (81 feet in length by 19 feet
wide with 50-foot radius cul-de-sac at the terminus). The vacated cul-de-sac will be replaced through the
dedication of an emergency access turn-around. The street is located approximately 500 feet west of the
intersection of Alki Avenue and Bannen Road and further located between the southern boundary of
Parcel 45143.1328 and the northern boundary of parcels 45143.1572 and 45143.1573.
TRACT 85 OF VERA
— — — N89`58'2h"'W' 451.00 — — —
W
'24"w - -bf11.0J - -
6fl,5D — — _11075 •
bcsy I Area to he vacated 2 ALKI AVE.
c' — — —r
,.._ r
No ❑ ❑ - - - -
_ 6 _i /icy¢ g o d F-5 f"7)I ' - .7
Y
(
/
-7 e,
. . o • J� �t
`� w Area to be dedicated CN .
145,50 x ppBit
291.00 J i7c
LI> m -,FISTING
TRACT "D'" co ,
OPTIONS: Set a date for a Public Hearing on the proposed street vacation or take no action.
RECOMMENDED MOTION: "Approve Resolution 13-007, setting September 12, 2013 as the date
for a Public Hearing before the Planning Commission on Street Vacation Application STV-2013-
0001."
STAFF CONTACT: Marty Palaniuk, Planner
Page 1 of 1
DRAFT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. 13-007
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, SETTING THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE AND TIME FOR THE
PLANNING COMMISSION TO CONSIDER STREET VACATION REQUEST STV-2013-
0001 PURSUANT TO RCW 35.79.010; AND OTHER MATTERS RELATED THERETO.
WHEREAS, the applicant Mike Silvey, on behalf of Evergreen & Valleyway, LLC, requests the
vacation of an unimproved, half-width, right-of-way of Alki Avenue (81 feet in length by 19 feet wide
with 50-foot radius cul-de-sac at the terminus). The street is located approximately 500 feet west of the
intersection of Alki Avenue and Bannen Road and further located between the southern boundary of
Parcel 45143.1328 and the northern boundary of parcels 45143.1572 and 45143.157; and
WHEREAS, RCW 35.79.010 specifies that the legislative authority shall establish by resolution
the time when a Street Vacation application shall be considered by the legislative authority or a
committee thereof; and
WHEREAS, the Spokane Valley Municipal Code 22.140 establishes regulations and procedures
for the processing of vacations of public streets (hereafter referred to as"Street Vacation"); and
WHEREAS, Spokane Valley Municipal Code 22.140.030 specifies that the Planning
Commission shall conduct the public hearing required pursuant to RCW 35.79.010; and shall develop
and forward a recommendation for a requested Street Vacation to the City Council.
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane
County,Washington, as follows:
Section 1. Establishment of Public Hearing Date and Time for STV-2013-0001. The required
public hearing for Street Vacation Request STV-2013-0001 shall be conducted before the Spokane
Valley Planning Commission, September 12, 2013 beginning at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council
Chambers at the City Hall of the City of Spokane Valley, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 101,
Spokane Valley,Washington 99206.
Section 2. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect upon adoption.
Adopted this 13th day of August,2013.
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
ATTEST:
Thomas E. Towey,Mayor
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Office of the City Attorney
Resolution No. 13-007 Establishment of Public Hearing Date and Time for STV-2013-0001 Page 1 of 1
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: August 13, 2013 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public
hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 13-010; CTA-2013-0004 City
Initiated Amendment to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code-minor updates to sign regulations
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A.106, SVMC 17.80.150 and 19.30.040
BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission conducted a study session on March 28, 2013,
followed by public hearings on April 11, 2013 and May 23, 2013. Following the public hearings,
the Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the proposed amendment (see
Attachments). The Planning Commission approved their Findings of Fact on June 27, 2013.
The Planning Commission's recommendation was presented to Council at the July 9, 2013
study session.
The first reading of the ordinance was July 23, 2013.
OPTIONS: Approve the ordinance with or without further amendments; send back to Planning
Commission for further review; or direct staff further.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Ordinance 13-010, Sign Code
Revisions, as presented.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A
STAFF CONTACT: John Hohman, Community Development Director
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Ordinance
DRAFT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 13-010
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON AMENDING SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION
22.110, SIGN REGULATIONS INCLUDING CHANGES TO THE NUMBER AND
TYPE OF TEMPORARY SIGNS ALLOWED, AND PERMIT SUBMITTAL
REQUIREMENTS; AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO.
WHEREAS, on September 25, 2007, the City of Spokane Valley (City) adopted Spokane Valley
Municipal Code (SVMC)Title 22,pursuant to Ordinance 07-015; and
WHEREAS,on October 28,2007, SVMC Title 22 became effective; and
WHEREAS, such regulations are authorized by RCW 36.70A; and
WHEREAS, the amendments set forth below are consistent with the goals and policies of the
City's Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, on March 20, 2013, the Washington State Department of Commerce was notified
pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, providing a 60-day notice of intent to adopt amendments to Spokane
Valley development regulations; and
WHEREAS, on March 28, 2013, the Planning Commission held a study session to hear a staff
report about the proposed amendments; and
WHEREAS, on March 29, 2013 and April 5, 2013, notice of a Planning Commission public
hearing was published in the Valley News Herald; and
WHEREAS, on April 11, 2013, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, received
evidence, information, public testimony, and a staff report with a recommendation followed by
deliberations; and
WHEREAS, on May 3, 2013 and May 10, 2013,notice of a second Planning Commission public
hearing was published in the Valley News Herald; and
WHEREAS, on May 23, 2013 the Planning Commission held a second public hearing, received
evidence, information, public testimony, and a staff report with a recommendation followed by
deliberations; and
WHEREAS,on June 12,2013 the Planning Commission continued deliberations; and
WHEREAS, on June 27, 2013, the Planning Commission approved its findings and conclusions;
and
WHEREAS,on July 9,2013, City Council reviewed the proposed amendment;and
WHEREAS, on July 23, 2013, City Council considered a first ordinance reading to adopt the
proposed amendments to SVMC 22.110; and
WHEREAS, on August 13, 2013, City Council considered a second ordinance reading to adopt
the proposed amendments to SVMC 22.110; and
Ordinance 13-010 Page 1 of 14
DRAFT
WHEREAS, SVMC 22.110, as amended, bears a substantial relation to the public health, safety
and welfare and protection of the environment.
NOW,THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley do ordain as follows:
Section 1. Purpose: The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend SVMC 22.110, including
minor updates to sign regulations relating to the number and type of temporary signs and permit submittal
requirements.
Section 2. Findings and Conclusions. The City Council acknowledges that the Planning
Commission conducted appropriate investigation and study, held public hearings on the proposed
amendments and recommends approval of the amendments. The City Council hereby adopts the findings
and conclusions of the Planning Commission, specifically that:
A. Growth Management Act Policies - The Washington State Growth Management Act
(GMA) provides that each city shall adopt a comprehensive land use plan and
development regulations that are consistent with and implement the Comprehensive Plan.
B. City of Spokane Valley Goals and Policies - The City of Spokane Valley has adopted
goals and policies consistent with the GMA and adopted County-Wide Planning Policies,
set forth below.
a. Land Use Policy LUP-14.3 Establish standards for the scale and intensity of
commercial,retail and industrial signage that protect views and minimize signage
clutter while allowing adequate business identification.
b. Economic Development Goal EDG-7: Maintain a regulatory environment that
offers flexibility,consistency,predictability and clear direction.
c. Economic Development Policy EDP-7.2: Review development regulations
periodically to ensure clarity,consistency and predictability.
C. Conclusions
a. The amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies and goals
establishing and maintaining a flexible and consistent regulatory environment
and preserving and protecting neighborhoods.
b. The amendment bears substantial relations to public health, safety and welfare,
and protection of the environment.
c. The proposed amendment will provide additional signage options to business
owners.
d. The proposed City initiated Code text amendment is consistent with the City's
adopted Comprehensive Plan and the approval criteria in SVMC 17.80.150(F).
e. The Growth Management Act stipulates that the Comprehensive Plan and
development regulations shall be subject to continuing review and evaluation by
the City. The proposal is consistent with RCW 36.70A, Washington State
Growth Management Act, which stipulates that the Comprehensive Plan and
development regulations be subject to continuing review and evaluation by the
City.
Section 3. Spokane Valley Municipal Code, Chapter 22.100, Sign Regulations, is hereby
amended as follows:
Ordinance 13-010 Page 2 of 14
DRAFT
Chapter 22.110
SIGN REGULATIONS
Sections:
22.110.010 Purpose,intent and scope.
22.110.020 Prohibited signs.
22.110.030 Permit required.
22.110.040 Number,general regulations for permitted permanent signs.
22.110.050 Permitted temporary signs.
22.110.060 General provisions applicable to all signs.
22.110.070 Comprehensive sign plan.
22.110.080 Aesthetic corridors.
22.110.090 Sign location and front setbacks.
22.110.100 Sign area calculation.
22.110.110 Maintenance of signs.
22.110.120 Existing nonconforming signs.
22.110.130 Billboards.
22.110.010 Purpose,intent and scope.
Signage regulations are intended to promote commerce,traffic safety and community identity while
improving the visual environment of residential,commercial and industrial areas. This code regulates
permanent,temporary, and portable signs.
22.110.020 Prohibited signs.
The following signs are prohibited:
A. Signs which by coloring, shape,wording or location resemble or conflict with traffic control signs or
devices;
B. Signs that create a safety hazard for pedestrian or vehicular traffic;
C. Flashing signs;
D. Portable signs; except A-frame signs and reader boards specifically allowed pursuant to SVMC
22.110.050(M) and(E);
E. Signs located within the public right-of-way,except official signs and except bus benches placed
pursuant to an agreement with the City;
F. Signs attached to or placed on a vehicle or trailer parked on public or private property;provided,that
this provision shall not be construed as prohibiting the identification of a business or its product on a
vehicle operating during the normal course of business;
G. Signs obstructing visibility within any clearview triangle as established in Chapter 22.70 SVMC;
Ordinance 13-010 Page 3 of 14
DRAFT
H. Billboards except when permitted as provided in SVMC 22.110.130;
I. Off-premises signs,except off-premises directional signs allowed pursuant to SVMC 22.110.040(D);
J. Temporary signs unless specifically allowed pursuant to SVMC 22.110.050;
K.Abandoned signs and sign structures.
22.110.030 Permit required.
A. Other than for those uses listed in subsection 031 of this section, a sign permit is required for all
allowed permanent signs,temporary signs,unless otherwise specified, and billboards.
B. Permits are not required for on-premises official signs; seasonal decorations; merchandise displays;
point-of-purchase advertising displays;national and state flags; flags of a political subdivision; notice
signs,inflatables; flags with copy;reader boards;temporary signs as listed in 22.110.050 pennants and
,trcamers without advertising copy; symbolic flags of nonprofit institutions dedicated to public service;
legal notices required by law;barber poles;historic site designations;commemorative
monuments/plaques; gravestones; advertising copy affixed to phone booths; donation and recycling
containers; lettering or symbols applied directly onto or flush-mounted magnetically to a motor vehicle
operating in the normal course of business;political signs supporting political issues,candidates or ballot
measures;replacement of copy on signs otherwise permitted;name plates with less than four square feet
of copy area; directional signs with less than four square feet of copy area; and murals containing no
copy.
C. Permit applications shall include a site plan that provides the following information:
1. The location of the affected lot,building(s) and sign(s);
2. The scale of the site plan;
3. The location of all existing signs for the subject applicant including size and height;A scaled
drawing of the proposed sign or sign revision,including size, height, copy, structural footing
details,method of attachment and illumination;
4. For signs subject to spacing regulations,the location of neighboring signs on adjacent
propertiesThe location of all existing signs on the site including size and height;
5. Approved sign plan,if applicableFor signs subject to spacing regulations,the location of
neighboring signs on adjacent properties and ;and;;
6. Tax parcel number where proposed sign will be located.Approved sign plan,if applicable; and
7. Tax parcel number where proposed sign will be located. (Ord. 12 013 § 1, 2012; Ord. 09 010
§ 1, 2009; Ord. 07 015 § 1, 2007).
Ordinance 13-010 Page 4 of 14
DRAFT
D. Permit applications shall include construction drawings that provide the following information:
1. Two complete sets of scaled drawings of the proposed sign or sign revision,including copy,
structural footing details; method of attachment and illumination. A Washington State licensed
engineer's design, stamp and signature is required on each construction drawing for signs over
30 feet in height,pole and monument signs over 100 square feet in sign area regardless of
height, flag signs over 10 feet in height regardless of sign area and wall signs where it is
determined the size and weight of the sign is a factor on the structural integrity of the building or
structure. Where special conditions exist for any type of sign,the Building Official is authorized
to require additional construction documents to be prepared by a Washington State licensed
engineer and/or special inspections if deemed necessary.
22.110.040 Number,general regulations for permitted permanent signs.
A. Permitted permanent signs shall comply with the requirements of Table 22.110-1.No more than the
maximum numbers of either freestanding pole signs or monument sign structures are allowed per parcel.
Table 22.110-1—Location,Height and Copy Area Requirements
Maximum
Copy Copy Side
Zoning Number Copy Area Area Yard Permit Additional
Land Use Height
District per Area (ft2)/Lot (ft)/Lot Setback Required Provisions
Parcel (ft.) (ft) Frontage Frontage (ft.)
< l00 ft. > l00 ft.
Attached Wall Signs
One sign up
Multifamily Complex All Zones * * * * * * Y to 20 sq. ft.
Residential *25% of wall
Institutional' * * * n/a n/a n/a Y
Zones area
Residential
Single Business 1 n/a 60 n/a n/a n/a Y
Zones
All Mixed
Use and *25%of wall
Nonresidential * n/a * n/a n/a n/a Y area per
Nonresidential
Zones building
Freestanding Signs
Subdivision/Area *One per 200
Name/Multifamily All Zones 1* 10 32 n/a n/a n/a 1' ft. of street
Complex/Institutional' frontage and
Single Business Neighborhood 1 20 100 n/a n/a 5 y 1 for each
Ordinance 13-010 Page 5 of 14
DRAFT
Multi-Business Business(NC) additional
1* 20 n/a 100 n/a 5 Y
Complex Zones 200 ft. or
Single Business 1* 30 n/a 100 200 5 Y fraction
thereof in
nonresidential
zones.
Additional
signs allowed
on a multi-
Mixed Use
business
and
complex site
Multi-Business Nonresidential
1* 40 250 ilia n/a 5 Y may all be
Complex Zones (except free-standing;
NC)
additional
signs allowed
on a single
business
parcel shall
be monument
signs
All
Nonresidential *Adj acent to
Nonresidential 1 50 250 n/a n/a 5 Y
Freeway* I-90 only
Zones
Monument Signs MI
Subdivision/Area
Name/Multifamily All Zones 1 10 32 n/a n/a n/a Y
Complex/Institutional'
Per street
Single Business Neighborhood 1* 7 75 n/a n/a 5 Y frontage
Multi-Business Business(NC)
Complex
Zones 2* 7 90 n/a n/a 5 Y
Single Business All Mixed 2* 7 90 n/a n/a 5 Y
Use and *Per street
Multi-Business Nonresidential 2* frontage
2 7 150 n/a n/a 5 Y g
Complex Zones
Pther Ski's
Directional All Zones n/a n/a 4 n/a n/a n/a N
Name Plates All Zones 1 n/a 4 n/a n/a n/a N
1. Institutional includes nonprofit,religious or public uses,such as a church,library,public,or private school, hospital,
or government owned or operated building, structure,or land used for public purposes.
Ordinance 13-010 Page 6 of 14
DRAFT
B. In addition to the permanent signs allowed pursuant to Table 22.110-1, a single decorative emblem(or
standard)constructed of durable vinyl with a thickness of not less than 13 mil for every 50 feet of
frontage shall be allowed.The lowest horizontal member of the bracket shall be located at a height of not
less than seven feet above the adjacent grade.
C. Where three or more single businesses agree to share a single sign structure, an additional 20 percent
of copy area shall be allowed up to a maximum of 250 square feet.
D. Off-Premises Directional Signs. It is the intent of this subsection to allow the limited placement of off-
premises directional signs by co-locating on an existing conforming monument sign, freestanding sign,or
building wall.The-A business locating placing this type of sign on an existing sign must shall conform to
the following criteria:
1. The business must shall be located on a private easement or local access street;
2. The business and proposed sign must shall be located in a commercial,office,industrial or
mixed zone area;
3. Text shall be limited to the business name,logo,and a directional arrow and may include
certain advancing language as"next right";
4. The sign must shall be located on the nearest collector or arterial. If a business has double
frontage, staff will review this unique situation to determine if two directional signs are
warranted;
5. Sign area shall be limited to 15 square feet; this shall not be construed to allow the on-
premises sign to increase its sign area; and
6. If the business using an off-premises directional sign leaves its location,the business must
shall remove the sign within 60 days.
7. If the site has no existing signage or buildings,then a freestanding sign meeting the
requirements above may be allowed.
22.110.050 d Tlemporary signs.
Except as otherwise described under this section,no permit is necessary for temporary signs.Temporary
signs arc not allowed to continually advertise goods, services or events on a site;permanent signs shall bo
used for that purpose.
A. A temporary sign advertising a special event, sale,promotion, opening of a new business or opening of
a business under new management may be displayed and must be removed at end of use, event or
condition.
AB.Number of Temporary Signs.No more than two of the followingene sueh signs shall be allowed at
any one time for a use,except as permitted in subsection E below_-
Ordinance 13-010 Page 7 of 14
DRAFT
1. One Banner,or
2. One Reader board,or
3. One Flag with copy,
4,4.Or any combination of the above,not to exceed a total of two signs.
BC. Each signSignage shall be limited to 32 square feet in size.
D. All temporary signs must be made of durable materials and shall be well maintained. Signs are not
well maintained if they are frayed, torn, or broken, or the legibility thereof has materially deteriorated.
Unmaintained signs will be required to be removed.
E. Banner signs must be attached to the facade,wall or window of the building which includes the
business which they advertise.
CF.Additional banners or temporary signs advertising a special event, sale,promotion,opening of a new
business or a business under new management,including banners,balloons,pennants, flags with copy,
streamers, searchlights and inflatables are allowed by temporary permit for a period of time not to exceed
60 days a maximum of two times in any calendar year.
G. Pennants,balloons, and streamers may be displayed in conjunction with the special event signago
allowed in subsection F of this section,but must be removed at the conclusion of the event or within 60
consecutive days.
DH. Temporary signs shall not endanger the public safety and shall be removed or relocated if the
building official determines that a sign is unsafe.
Et A-Frame Signs. Each bgusiness will be allowed a maximum of one sandwich board or A-frame sign.
These signs are in addition to other temporary signs allowed through subsections A through Hand C of
this section,and are subject to the following conditions:
1. Size. The area of the sign shall not exceed nine square feet per side in size and shall not
exceed three feet in any dimension.
2.Maintenance Standards. Signs shall be constructed out of materials able to withstand extreme
weather conditions. Such materials may be metal, finished wood,chalkboard,whiteboard or
plastic. Signs and copy should be of professional quality. Permanent lettering for the business
name and logo are required on the sandwich boards. Owners of sandwich board signs shall be
required to keep their signs in an intact,reasonably legible, and well maintained manner.
Sandwich boards are not well maintained if any part thereof is broken; letters or graphics are
completely or partially missing or obstructed; or the legibility thereof has materially deteriorated.
3. Display Time. _•_ - . . .• . . . . . _ .- •- .. . .- •- ..
continuoIf the sign is displayed past daylight hours,precautions should be taken to place the sign
in a lighted area.This shall not be construed to allow the wiring of a sign for lighting.
Ordinance 13-010 Page 8 of 14
DRAFT
4. Location. Signs shall not be placed in a location which is within the clearview triangle, as
defined in SVMC 22.70.020(C),or any other location which will impede vehicular traffic.
Further,such signs shall not be placed in a manner which will block or otherwise obstruct the
safe use of sidewalks,building entrances or stairs by pedestrians.
F3.Temporary on-premises commercial signs are allowed without permit when posted in conjunction
with the alteration,construction,sale or lease of real property. Such signs shall not exceed 16 square feet
in copy area or seven feet in height.All such signs shall be affixed to either the ground or a permanent
structure by rope,wire,or a mechanical device.
K. Open House/Directional Signage.A-frame signs may be used as open house/directional signs and
shall be allowed on each access street to the property. Signs shall be placed so as not to interfere with
vehicular or pedestrian traffic, shall be used only when the property is open for inspection, shall be unlit,
and shall be limited in size to five square feet and limited in height to three feet above grade.
22.110.060 General provisions applicable to all signs.
A.All signs illuminated with exterior lighting shall have lighting confined to the sign, and positioned and
shielded to minimize impacts to the surrounding area(s). Gooseneck reflectors and lights are permitted on
permanent freestanding and wall signs;provided,that lighting or glare does not extend beyond the
property line.
B. Electronic signs shall be permitted on the same basis as other signs, subject to the requirements of
Table 22.110-1.All electronic message centers(EMCs) are required to have automatic dimming
capability that adjusts the brightness to the ambient light at all times of the day and night.Written
documentation that the EMC is equipped with the automatic dimming device shall be submitted with the
sign permit application.
C.A roof-mounted sign may be substituted for an allowed freestanding sign;provided,that the height of
the sign structure may not exceed the maximum height requirements of the zoning district in which the
sign is located.
D. Signs located within the airport hazard area shall conform to the location and height regulations set
forth in SVMC 19.110.030,Airport Hazard Overlay zone.
E.No sign shall be erected,relocated or maintained in a manner that prevents the free ingress or egress
from any door,window or fire escape.
F.No sign shall be attached to a standpipe or fire escape except official signs.
G.Any sign erected or maintained within five feet of public rights-of-way shall be smooth and free of
nails,tacks and wires.
H.All signs shall be maintained in good repair pursuant to SVMC 22.110.110.
I.No sign shall block the view of fire protection equipment from approach.
Ordinance 13-010 Page 9 of 14
DRAFT
22.110.070 Comprehensive sign plan.
Commercial development, shopping centers,industrial parks,mixed use developments, and hotel
conference centers exceeding five acres in size may seek approval of a sign plan specific to the proposed
development. The director may approve a comprehensive sign plan that allows deviations from the strict
interpretation of spacing,height and area requirements when the following is demonstrated:
A. The plan provides adequate signage for all proposed uses; and
B. The plan limits the number of freestanding sign structures; and
C. The total copy area of all signage does not exceed the amount which would otherwise be permitted.
Any conditions imposed to secure approvals shall be binding on the applicant,his successors and assigns.
Modifications/amendments to the approved sign plan shall require reapplication and approval by the
director. If the applicant and director cannot come to an agreement as to a comprehensive sign plan or a
modification/amendment to the same,the director's decision may be appealed to the hearing examiner
pursuant to Chapter 17.90 SVMC.
22.110.080 Aesthetic corridors.
A. The standards applicable to monument signs shown on Table 22.110-1 shall apply to parcels adjacent
to aesthetic corridors designated in the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan:
1. State Route 27 (16th Avenue south to City limits);
2. State Route 27 (Mansfield Avenue to Trent Avenue);
3.Appleway Boulevard(south side only from Park Road to Dishman Mica Road);
4.Appleway Avenue (Barker Road to Hodges Road);
5. Dishman Mica Road(8th Avenue south to City limits);
6. 32nd Avenue within the City limits;
7.Mirabeau Parkway(Pines Road to Indiana Avenue).
B. Only monument signs as shown on Table 22.110-1 shall be allowed with designated aesthetic
corridors.
22.110.090 Sign location and front setbacks.
A.Monument signs exceeding three feet in height shall be setback 10 feet from the front property line and
outside any border easement;provided,that the requirements of Chapter 22.70 SVMC,Fencing,
Screening and Landscaping,(clearview triangles)have been met.
Ordinance 13-010 Page 10 of 14
DRAFT
B.Freestanding signs with structural supports less than two feet in width,with copy area placed at a
height of seven feet or more above grade,may be located at the property line; provided,that the
requirements of Chapter 22.70 SVMC,Fencing, Screening and Landscaping, (clearview triangles)of the
Spokane Valley Munici al Code have been met.Freestanding signs with
structural supports of more than two feet shall be set back not less than 10 feet from the front property
line or border easement.
C.All temporary signs,except inflatable signs, shall be located at least five feet from public rights-of-
way.
D. Inflatable signs shall be set back at least 10 feet from public rights-of-way.
E. All signs shall meet the vertical and horizontal clearance requirements of electric utilities.
F.All new freestanding signs shall be located in a landscaped area in accordancecomply with SVMC
22.70.030(J)Landscaping. Landscaping should ensure that signs arc not blocked or obscured by trees or
bushes. (Ord. 07 015 § 1, 2007).
22.110.100 Sign area calculation.
A. Sign area for wall signs shall be no more than 25 percent of the two-dimensional area of a building's
elevation,excluding eaves and gables. Refer to Table 22.110-1.
PETE'S PRO GOLF
•__
----
_--•
Figure 22.110-1
SIGN
I ....urn...,
Minimum Haight
Properly
Line
Figure 22.110-2
Ordinance 13-010 Page 11 of 14
DRAFT
Harder h
SIGN i I Di
lAa: FIdh!
—'A
SIGN 2 $ Be
4
VW,: 3 Ea
Figure 22.110-3
B. The sign area of a freestanding sign for a single business shall be calculated as shown in Figure
22.110-2. The sign area of a freestanding sign identifying multiple businesses shall be computed by
adding together the total area(s)of all signs as shown in Figure 22.110-3. Refer to Table 22.110-1 for
minimum and maximum height requirements.
C. The sign area for multiple-sided signs shall be calculated as follows:
1. The total sign area for a two-sided sign shall be calculated using a single surface of a sign with
messages on both sides;
2. The sign area for a three-sided sign shall be the sum of all surfaces where two or more signs
share a single structure;
3. The gross surface area of both faces of a V-shaped sign;
4. The copy area of a monument sign.
D.For irregularly shaped signs,the sign area is calculated by enclosing the extreme limits of the sign by
no more than four rectangles. The sum of the area of the rectangles shall be the gross surface area.The
maximum allowable area is reduced by 10 percent for the second and each subsequent rectangle used in
the calculation,illustrated below.
a
A
laCrine
1. Conventional Measurement. Total area=a times b.
2. Sum of Rectangles.Total area=(Area A+Area B +Area C+Area D).
Ordinance 13-010 Page 12 of 14
DRAFT
22.110.110 Maintenance of signs.
A.All signs shall be maintained in good repair. The director shall have the authority to revoke any permit
for signs that are tattered,torn, faded or otherwise in disrepair, and may require the removal of banners,
flags,reader boards,pennants and streamers which are torn,discolored or in disrepair.
B.All signage shall be maintained by the business owner,or person in possession of the property on
which the sign is located.Maintenance shall be such that the signage continues to conform to the
conditions imposed by the sign permit.
C.Any damaged sign structure shall be repaired within 30 days of notice.
D.Any signage which has been damaged to such extent that it may pose a hazard to passersby shall be
repaired or removed within 48 hours of notice.
E.Any abandoned sign shall be removed by and at the expense of the property owner within 60 days of
notice.
F.Any abandoned sign support structure shall be removed within 36 months by the owner or lessee of the
premises upon which the sign is located.
22.110.120 Existing nonconforming signs.
Any permanent sign made nonconforming as a result of the adoption of these regulations may be repaired,
but not structurally altered or made more nonconforming in any way. If the sign is removed in order to
make repairs,it shall be replaced within 60 days,or any nonconforming rights are terminated.Thereafter,
the sign shall conform to the requirements of this chapter.
Notwithstanding other provisions of this section, any sign or signs for which a temporary permit has been
issued by the City shall be permitted to remain at the location or locations authorized by the permit for as
long as the permit is valid and all the requirements of the permit have been met.
22.110.130 Billboards.
A.New billboards shall be prohibited; provided,however,that existing billboards may be replaced at
another location with a structure and copy area of equal or smaller size in mixed use and nonresidential
zoning districts except(NC)Neighborhood Commercial zoning districts as follows:
1. Replacement billboards shall not exceed the height limit in the underlying zoning district,with
a maximum height limit of 50 feet in any zone;
2.No replacement billboard shall exceed 672 square feet in copy area;
3.Any replacement billboard may not be placed less than five feet from the property line.No
portion of the sign shall extend beyond the property line;
4.No billboard may be located within 1,000 feet of another billboard on the same side of the
street.Any replacement billboard shall be offset from any billboard on the opposite side of the
Ordinance 13-010 Page 13 of 14
DRAFT
street by not less than 250 feet. Offset distance shall be measured from a point perpendicular to
and along the alignment of the roadway;
5. The owner of the billboard shall file a complete inventory of all billboards located within the
City,including date erected,height,size and location;
6. Issuance of a permit for billboard replacement shall be accompanied by a permit for the
destruction or removal of the billboard to be replaced; and
7.Any billboard that is not replaced within five years6P-ffreftths following the issuance of a
demolition/removal permit shall not be replaced.
B. Replacement billboards shall not be permitted along designated aesthetic corridors.
Section 4. All other provisions of SVMC Title 22 not specifically referenced hereto shall
remain in full force and effect.
Section 5. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be
held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause,
or phrase of this Ordinance.
Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after
publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane
Valley as provided by law.
Passed by the City Council this day of August, 2013.
Mayor,Thomas E. Towey
ATTEST:
City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge
Approved as to Form:
Office of the City Attorney
Date of Publication:
Effective Date:
Ordinance 13-010 Page 14 of 14
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: August 13, 2013 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information [' admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second reading - proposed Ordinance 13-011 Telecommunications
franchise to Zayo Communications.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35A.47.040.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adoption of initial franchise in July, 2003;
administrative report July 16, 2013; first reading July 23, 2013.
BACKGROUND: The City granted a 10-year franchise to Columbia Fiber in July, 2003 for the
construction and operation of a fiber network in the City's rights-of-way. This proposed
replacement franchise would be 10 years as well. There is no recurring franchise fee payable to
the City for this type of franchise (as compared to a cable franchise), as set forth in state law.
Zayo has reviewed this draft and is in agreement with the proposed terms. The terms are
substantially similar to those in other franchises adopted by the City. Staff recommends
approving proposed Ordinance 13-011 granting Zayo a telecommunications franchise.
OPTIONS: (1) Approve Ordinance 13-011; or (2) take other action as appropriate.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move that we approve Ordinance 13-011, granting a
telecommunications franchise to Zayo.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: NA
STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Ordinance 13-011 granting fiber optic franchise to Zayo
Communications, with attached route map.
DRAFT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 13-011
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, GRANTING A NON-EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE TO ZAYO GROUP,LLC TO
CONSTRUCT,MAINTAIN AND OPERATE TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES WITHIN
THE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,AND OTHER
MATTERS RELATING THERETO.
WHEREAS, RCW 35A.47.040 authorizes the City to grant, permit, and regulate "nonexclusive
franchises for the use of public streets, bridges or other public ways, structures or places above or below
the surface of the ground for railroads and other routes and facilities for public conveyances, for poles,
conduits, tunnels, towers and structures, pipes and wires and appurtenances thereof for transmission and
distribution of electrical energy, signals and other methods of communication, for gas, steam and liquid
fuels, for water, sewer and other private and publicly owned and operated facilities for public service";
and
WHEREAS, RCW 35A.47.040 further requires that "no ordinance or resolution granting any
franchise in a code city for any purpose shall be adopted or passed by the city's legislative body on the
day of its introduction nor for five days thereafter, nor at any other than a regular meeting nor without
first being submitted to the city attorney, nor without having been granted by the approving vote of at
least a majority of the entire legislative body,nor without being published at least once in a newspaper of
general circulation in the city before becoming effective"; and
WHEREAS,this Ordinance has been submitted to the city attorney prior to its passage;and
WHEREAS,the Council finds that the grant of the Franchise contained in this Ordinance, subject
to its terms and conditions, is in the best interests of the public, and protects the health, safety, and
welfare of the citizens of this City.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County,
Washington,ordains as follows:
Section 1. Definitions. For the purpose of this Ordinance, the following words and terms
shall have the meaning set forth below:
"City Manager"means the City Manager or designee.
"construction" or "construct" shall mean constructing, digging, excavating, laying,
testing, operating, extending, upgrading, renewing, removing, replacing, and repairing a
facility.
"day" shall mean a 24-hour period beginning at 12:01 AM. If a thing or act is to be done
in less than seven days, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays shall be
excluded in the computation of time.
"franchise area" shall mean the entire geographic area within the City as it is now
constituted or may in the future be constituted.
Ordinance 13-011 Zayo Telecommunications Franchise Page 1 of 14
DRAFT
"hazardous substances" shall have the same meaning as RCW 70.105D.020(10).
"maintenance,maintaining or maintain" shall mean the work involved in the replacement
and/or repair of facilities, including constructing, relaying, repairing, replacing,
examining, testing, inspecting, removing, digging and excavating, and restoring
operations incidental thereto.
"overbuilding" shall mean adding additional fiber capacity to an existing conduit housing
fiber optic cable.
"overlashing" shall mean the act of lashing new fiber optic cable to an existing aerial
fiber optic cable.
"permittee" shall mean a person or entity who has been granted a permit by the
Permitting Authority.
"permitting authority" shall mean the City Manager or designee authorized to process and
grant permits required to perform work in the rights-of-way.
"product" shall refer to the item,thing or use provided by the Grantee.
"public property" shall mean any real estate or any facility owned by the City.
"Public Works Director" shall mean the Spokane Valley Public Works Director or his/her
designee.
"relocation" shall mean any required move or relocation of an existing installation or
equipment owned by Grantee whereby such move or relocation is necessitated by
installation, improvement, renovation or repair of another entity's facilities in the rights-
of-way,including Grantor's facilities.
"right-of-way" shall refer to the surface of and the space along, above, and below any
street, road, highway, freeway, lane, sidewalk, alley, court, boulevard, parkway, drive,
Grantee easement, and/or public way now or hereafter held or administered by the City.
"streets" or "highways" shall mean the surface of, and the space above and below, any
public street, road, alley or highway, within the City used or intended to be used by the
general public,to the extent the City has the right to allow the Grantee to use them.
"telecommunications facilities" shall mean any of the plant, equipment, fixtures,
appurtenances, antennas, and other facilities necessary to furnish and deliver
telecommunications services, including but not limited to poles with crossarms, poles
without crossarms, wires, lines, conduits, cables, communication and signal lines and
equipment, braces, guys, anchors, vaults, and all attachments, appurtenances, and
appliances necessary or incidental to the distribution and use of telecommunications
services. The abandonment by Grantee of any telecommunications facilities as defined
herein shall not act to remove the same from this definition.
Section 2. Grant of Franchise. The City of Spokane Valley, a Washington municipal
corporation (hereinafter the "City"), hereby grants unto the Zayo Group (hereinafter "Grantee"), a
franchise for a period of 10 years, beginning on the effective date of this Ordinance, to install, construct,
Ordinance 13-011 Zayo Telecommunications Franchise Page 2 of 14
DRAFT
operate, maintain, replace and use all necessary equipment and facilities to place telecommunications
facilities in, under, on, across, over, through, along or below the public rights-of-way and public places
located in the City of Spokane Valley, as approved under City permits issued pursuant to this franchise
(hereinafter the "franchise"). This franchise does not permit Grantee to use such facilities to provide
cable services as defined by 47 C.F.R. § 76.5(ff).
Section 3. Fee. No right-of-way use fee is imposed for the term of this franchise. Any such
right-of-way use or franchise fee that may be imposed by subsequent ordinance would apply to any
subsequent franchise,if any,between the parties.
Section 4. City Use. The following provisions shall apply regarding City use.
1. Grantee agrees to reserve to the City the right to access four dark fiber strands(two pair)
along the route identified in Exhibit A as adopted or amended, within the boundaries of the City, for sole
and exclusive municipal, non-commercial use or designation (the "City Reserved Fibers"). City agrees
that it shall not use the City Reserved Fibers as a public utility provider of telecommunications business
service to the public. It is the intent of Grantor and Grantee that any additional fiber capacity resulting
from overbuilding, overlashing, or relocation of Grantee's facilities shall not be considered a new route
for purposes of increasing the number of dark fiber strands available for use by Grantor, except as set
forth under 4.3,below.
2. The City has the right to access by connection to the City Reserved Fibers at existing
Grantee splice points or reasonably established access points within the City limits; provided that all
splicing shall be sole responsibility of the Grantee. The City shall provide at least 30 days' written notice
of intent to access the City Reserved Fibers. Upon any access or use of the City Reserved Fibers, City
shall pay Grantee a recurring monthly charge of$20.00 per fiber pair per mile in use by the City (the
"City Fiber Rate") unless otherwise specifically agreed by both the parties in writing and shall enter into
Grantee's standard"Fiber License Agreement"which shall govern the terms and conditions for use of the
City Reserved Fibers, except cost, which is set forth herein. Said recurring monthly charge shall not be
imposed until such time as the fiber is put into use by the City.
3. In the event the City Reserved Fibers are the last fibers remaining in Grantee's fiber
bundle,then the following shall apply:
A. If the City is using the fibers,then the rate the City shall pay Grantee will change from
the City Fiber Rate to Grantee's standard commercial rate.
B. If the City is not using the fibers,the City shall have the option of abandoning the City
Reserved Fibers in lieu of paying Grantee's standard commercial rate.
If Grantee installs additional fiber capacity, the City's right to use four dark fiber stands as set forth in
subsections 1 and 2,immediately above, shall again be in effect.
4. All access, interconnection and maintenance to and on the City Reserved Fibers shall be
performed by Grantee. The City shall pay all costs associated with such work to the City Reserved
Fibers. The City Reserved Fibers shall have a term that matches the duration of this franchise Ordinance.
5. Consistent with and subject to RCW 35.99.070, at such time when Grantee is
constructing, relocating, or placing ducts or conduits in public rights-of-way, the Public Works Director
may require Grantee to provide the City with additional duct or conduit and related structures, at
Ordinance 13-011 Zayo Telecommunications Franchise Page 3 of 14
DRAFT
incremental cost,necessary to access the conduit at mutually convenient locations. Any ducts or conduits
provided by Grantee under this section shall only be used for City municipal,non-commercial purposes.
A. The City shall not require that the additional duct or conduit space be connected to the
access structures and vaults of the Grantee.
B. This section shall not affect the provision of an institutional network by a cable
television provider under federal law.
C. Grantee shall notify the Public Works Director at least 14 days' prior to opening a
trench at any location to allow the City to exercise its options as provided herein.
Section 5. Recovery of Costs. Grantee shall reimburse the City for all costs of one publication
of this franchise in a local newspaper, and required legal notices prior to any public hearing regarding this
franchise, contemporaneous with its acceptance of this franchise. Grantee shall be subject to all permit and
inspection fees associated with activities undertaken through the authority granted in this franchise or
under City Code. Grantee shall be subject to all permit and inspection fees associated with activities
undertaken through the authority granted in this franchise or under City Code.
Section 6. Non-Exclusivity. This franchise is granted upon the express condition that it
shall not in any manner prevent the City from granting other or further franchises or permits in any rights-
of-way. This and other franchises shall, in no way, prevent or prohibit the City from using any of its
rights-of-way or affect its jurisdiction over them or any part of them.
Section 7. Non-Interference with Existing Facilities. The City shall have prior and superior
right to the use of its rights-of-way and public properties for installation and maintenance of its facilities
and other governmental purposes. The City hereby retains full power to make all changes, relocations,
repairs, maintenance, establishments, improvements, dedications or vacation of same as the City may
deem fit, including the dedication, establishment, maintenance, and improvement of all new rights-of-
way, streets, avenues, thoroughfares and other public properties of every type and description. Any and
all such removal or replacement shall be at the sole expense of the Grantee, unless RCW 35.99.060
provides otherwise. Should Grantee fail to remove, adjust or relocate its telecommunications facilities by
the date established by the Public Works Director's written notice to Grantee and in accordance with
RCW 35.99.060, the City may cause and/or effect such removal, adjustment or relocation, and the
expense thereof shall be paid by Grantee.
The owners of all utilities, public or private, installed in or on such public properties prior to the
installation of the telecommunications facilities of the Grantee, shall have preference as to the positioning
and location of such utilities so installed with respect to the Grantee. Such preference shall continue in
the event of the necessity of relocating or changing the grade of any such public properties.
Grantee's telecommunications facilities shall be constructed and maintained in such manner as
not to interfere with any public use, or with any other pipes, wires, conduits or other facilities that may
have been laid in the rights-of-way by or under the City's authority. If the work done under this franchise
damages or interferes in any way with the public use or other facilities,the Grantee shall wholly and at its
own expense make such provisions necessary to eliminate the interference or damage to the satisfaction
of the Public Works Director.
Section 8. Construction Standards. All work authorized and required hereunder shall comply
with all generally applicable City Codes and regulations. Grantee shall also comply with all applicable
federal and state regulations,laws and practices. Grantee is responsible for the supervision, condition, and
Ordinance 13-011 Zayo Telecommunications Franchise Page 4 of 14
DRAFT
quality of the work done,whether it is by itself or by contractors,assigns or agencies. Application of said
federal, state, and City Codes and regulations shall be for the purposes of fulfilling the City's public
trustee role in administering the primary use and purpose of public properties, and not for relieving the
Grantee of any duty, obligation, or responsibility for the competent design, construction, maintenance,
and operation of its telecommunications facilities. Grantee is responsible for the supervision, condition,
and quality of the work done,whether it is by itself or by contractors,assigns or agencies.
If Grantee shall at any time be required, or plan,to excavate trenches in any area covered by this
franchise,the Grantee shall afford the City an opportunity to permit other franchisees and utilities to share
such excavated trenches, provided that: (1) such joint use shall not unreasonably delay the work of the
Grantee; and(2) such joint use shall not adversely affect Grantee's telecommunications facilities or safety
thereof. Joint users will be required to contribute to the costs of excavation and filling on a pro-rata basis.
Section 9. Protection of Monuments. Grantee shall comply with applicable state laws
relating to protection of monuments.
Section 10. Tree Trimming. The Grantee shall have the authority to conduct pruning and
trimming for access to Grantee's telecommunications facilities in the rights-of-way subject to compliance
with the City Code. All such trimming shall be done at the Grantee's sole cost and expense.
Section 11. Emergency Response. The Grantee shall, within 30 days of the execution of this
franchise, designate one or more responsible people and an emergency 24-hour on-call personnel and the
procedures to be followed when responding to an emergency. After being notified of an emergency,
Grantee shall cooperate with the City to immediately respond with action to aid in the protection of the
health and safety of the public.
In the event the Grantee refuses to promptly take the directed action or fails to fully comply with
such direction, or if emergency conditions exist which require immediate action to prevent imminent
injury or damages to persons or property, the City may take such actions as it believes are necessary to
protect persons or property and the Grantee shall be responsible to reimburse the City for its costs and any
expenses.
Section 12. One-Call System. Pursuant to RCW 19.122, Grantee is responsible for becoming
familiar with, and understanding, the provisions of Washington's One-Call statutes. Grantee shall
comply with the terms and conditions set forth in the One-Call statutes.
Section 13. Safety. All of Grantee's telecommunications facilities in the rights-of-way shall
be constructed and maintained in a safe and operational condition. Grantee shall follow all safety codes
and other applicable regulations in the installation, operation, and maintenance of the telecommunications
facilities.
Section 14. Movement of Grantee's Telecommunications Facilities for Others. Whenever any
third party shall have obtained permission from the City to use any right—of-way for the purpose of
moving any building or other oversized structure, Grantee, upon 14 days' written notice from the City,
shall move, at the expense of the third party desiring to move the building or structure, any of Grantee's
telecommunications facilities that may obstruct the movement thereof; provided,that the path for moving
such building or structure is the path of least interference to Grantee's telecommunications facilities, as
determined by the City. Upon good cause shown by Grantee, the City may require more than 14 days'
notice to Grantee to move its telecommunications facilities.
Ordinance 13-011 Zayo Telecommunications Franchise Page 5 of 14
DRAFT
Section 15. Acquiring New Telecommunications Facilities. Upon Grantee's acquisition of
any new telecommunications facilities in the rights-of-way,or upon any addition or annexation to the City
of any area in which Grantee retains any such telecommunications facilities in the rights-of-way, the
Grantee shall submit to the City a written statement describing all telecommunications facilities involved,
whether authorized by franchise or any other form of prior right, and specifying the location of all such
facilities. Such facilities shall immediately be subject to the terms of this franchise.
Section 16. Dangerous Conditions - Authority of City to Abate. Whenever excavation,
installation, construction, repair, maintenance, or relocation of telecommunications facilities authorized
by this franchise has caused or contributed to a condition that substantially impairs the lateral support of
the adjoining right-of-way, road, street or other public place, or endangers the public, adjoining public or
private property or street utilities, the City may direct Grantee, at Grantee's sole expense, to take all
necessary actions to protect the public and property. The City may require that such action be completed
within a prescribed time.
In the event that Grantee fails or refuses to promptly take the actions directed by the City, or fails
to fully comply with such directions,or if emergency conditions exist which require immediate action,the
City may enter upon the property and take such actions as are necessary to protect the public, adjacent
public or private property,or street utilities,or to maintain the lateral support thereof, and all other actions
deemed by the City to be necessary to preserve the public safety and welfare; and Grantee shall be liable
to the City for all costs and expenses thereof to the extent caused by Grantee.
Section 17. Hazardous Substances. Grantee shall comply with all applicable federal, state
and local laws, statutes, regulations and orders concerning hazardous substances relating to Grantee's
telecommunications facilities in the rights—of-way. Grantee agrees to indemnify the City against any
claims, costs, and expenses, of any kind,whether direct or indirect, incurred by the City arising out of the
release or threat of release of hazardous substances caused by Grantee's ownership or operation of its
telecommunications facilities within the City's rights-of-way.
Section 18. Environmental. Grantee shall comply with all environmental protection laws,
rules, recommendations, and regulations of the United States and the State of Washington, and their
various subdivisions and agencies as they presently exist or may hereafter be enacted, promulgated, or
amended, and shall indemnify and hold the City harmless from any and all damages arising, or which
may arise,or be caused by,or result from the failure of Grantee fully to comply with any such laws,rules,
recommendations, or regulations, whether or not Grantee's acts or activities were intentional or
unintentional. Grantee shall further indemnify the City against all losses, costs, and expenses (including
legal expenses) which the City may incur as a result of the requirement of any government or
governmental subdivision or agency to clean and/or remove any pollution caused or permitted by
Grantee,whether said requirement is during the term of the franchise or subsequent to its termination.
Section 19. Relocation of Telecommunications Facilities. Grantee agrees and covenants, at
its sole cost and expense, to protect, support, temporarily disconnect, relocate or remove from any street
any of its telecommunications facilities when so required by the City in accordance with the provisions of
RCW 35.99.060,provided that Grantee shall in all such cases have the privilege to temporarily bypass, in
the authorized portion of the same street upon approval by the City, any section of its telecommunications
facilities required to be temporarily disconnected or removed.
If the City determines that the project necessitates the relocation of Grantee's then- existing
telecommunications facilities,the City shall:
Ordinance 13-011 Zayo Telecommunications Franchise Page 6 of 14
DRAFT
a) At least 60 days prior to the commencement of such improvement project,
provide Grantee with written notice requiring such relocation; and
b) Provide Grantee with copies of pertinent portions of the plans and specifications
for such improvement project and a proposed location for Grantee's telecommunications
facilities so that Grantee may relocate its telecommunications facilities in other City
rights-of-way in order to accommodate such improvement project.
c) After receipt of such notice and such plans and specifications, Grantee shall
complete relocation of its telecommunications facilities at no charge or expense to the
City so as to accommodate the improvement project in accordance with RCW 35.99.060
(2).
Grantee may, after receipt of written notice requesting a relocation of its telecommunications
facilities, submit to the City written alternatives to such relocation. The City shall evaluate such
alternatives and advise Grantee in writing if one or more of the alternatives are suitable to accommodate
the work which would otherwise necessitate relocation of the telecommunications facilities. If so
requested by the City, Grantee shall submit additional information to assist the City in making such
evaluation. The City shall give each alternative proposed by Grantee full and fair consideration. In the
event the City ultimately determines that there is no other reasonable alternative, Grantee shall relocate its
telecommunications facilities as otherwise provided in this section.
The provisions of this section shall in no manner preclude or restrict Grantee from making any
arrangements it may deem appropriate when responding to a request for relocation of its
telecommunications facilities by any person or entity other than the City, where the telecommunications
facilities to be constructed by said person or entity are not or will not become City owned, operated or
maintained facilities,provided that such arrangements do not unduly delay a City construction project.
If the City or a contractor for the City is delayed at any time in the progress of the work by an act
or neglect of the Grantee or those acting for or on behalf of Grantee,then Grantee shall indemnify, defend
and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims,
injuries, damages, losses or suits including attorney fees to the extent arising out of or in connection with
such delays, except for delays and damages caused by the City. This provision may not be waived by the
parties except in writing.
Section 20. Abandonment of Grantee's Telecommunications Facilities. No facility
constructed or owned by Grantee may be abandoned without the express written consent of the City,
which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. The City has discretion and authority to direct Grantee
to remove a facility abandoned by Grantee (whether or not the entity had permission to abandon the
facility) and restore the rights-of-way to their pre-removal condition when: (a) a City project involves
digging that will encounter the abandoned facility; (b)the abandoned facility poses a hazard to the health,
safety, or welfare of the public; (c) the abandoned facility is 24 inches or less below the surface of the
rights-of-way and the City is reconstructing or resurfacing a street over the rights-of-way; or (d) the
abandoned facility has collapsed,broke,or otherwise failed.
Grantee may delay removal of the abandoned facility until such time as the City commences a
construction project in the rights-of-way unless (b)or(d) above applies. When(b)or(d) applies,Grantee
shall remove the abandoned facility from the rights-of-way as soon as weather conditions allow, unless
the City expressly allows otherwise in writing.
Ordinance 13-011 Zayo Telecommunications Franchise Page 7 of 14
DRAFT
The expense of the removal, and restoration of improvements in the rights-of-way that were
damaged by the facility or by the removal process, shall be the sole responsibility of the Grantee. If
Grantee fails to remove the abandoned facilities in accordance with the above, then the City may incur
costs to remove the abandoned facilities and restore the rights-of-way, and is entitled to reimbursement
from Grantee for such costs,including reasonable attorney's fees and costs.
Section 21. Maps and Records Required. Grantee shall provide the City,at no cost to the City:
1. A route map that depicts the general location of the Grantee's telecommunications facilities
placed in the rights-of-way. The route map shall identify telecommunications facilities as aerial or
underground and is not required to depict cable types,number of fibers or cables, electronic equipment, and
service lines to individual subscribers. The Grantee shall also provide an electronic map of the
aerial/underground telecommunications facilities in relation to the right-of-way centerline reference to allow
the City to add this information to the City's Geographic Information System ("GIS") program. The
information in this subsection shall be delivered to the City by December 1,annually.
2. In connection with the construction of any City project,Grantee shall provide to the City,upon
the City's reasonable request,copies of available drawings in use by Grantee showing the location of such
telecommunications facilities. Grantee shall field locate its telecommunications facilities in order to
facilitate design and planning of City improvement projects.
3. Upon written request of the City, Grantee shall provide the City with the most recent update
available of any plan of potential improvements to its telecommunications facilities within the franchise
area; provided, however, any such plan so submitted shall be deemed confidential and for informational
purposes only, and shall not obligate Grantee to undertake any specific improvements within the franchise
area.The information in this subsection shall be delivered to the City by December 1, annually.
4. In addition to the requirements of subsection 1 of this section,the parties agree to periodically
share GIS files upon written request, provided Grantee's GIS files are to be used solely by the City for
governmental purposes. Any files provided to Grantee shall be restricted to information required for
Grantee's engineering needs for construction or maintenance of telecommunications facilities that are the
subject of this franchise. Grantee is prohibited from selling any GIS information obtained from City to
any third parties.
5. Public Disclosure Act. Grantee acknowledges that information submitted to the City may be
subject to inspection and copying under the Washington Public Disclosure Act codified in RCW 42.56.
Grantee shall mark as "PROPRIETARY/CONFIDENTIAL" each page or portion thereof of any
documentation/information which it submits to the City and which it believes is exempt from public
inspection or copying. The City agrees to timely provide the Grantee with a copy of any public disclosure
request to inspect or copy documentation/information which the Grantee has provided to the City and
marked as "PROPRIETARY/CONFIDENTIAL" prior to allowing any inspection and/or copying as well
as provide the Grantee with a time frame, consistent with RCW 42.56.520, to provide the City with its
written basis for non-disclosure of the requested documentation/information. In the event the City
disagrees with the Grantee's basis for non-disclosure,the City agrees to withhold release of the requested
documentation/information in dispute for a reasonable amount of time to allow Grantee an opportunity to
file a legal action under RCW 42.56.540.
Section 22. Limitation on Future Work. In the event that the City constructs a new street or
reconstructs an existing street, the Grantee shall not be permitted to excavate such street except as set
forth in the City's then-adopted regulations relating to street cuts and excavations.
Ordinance 13-011 Zayo Telecommunications Franchise Page 8 of 14
DRAFT
Section 23. Reservation of Rights by City. The City reserves the right to refuse any request
for a permit to extend telecommunications facilities. Any such refusal shall be supported by a written
statement from the Public Works Director that extending the telecommunications facilities, as proposed,
would interfere with the public health, safety or welfare.
Section 24. Remedies to Enforce Compliance. In addition to any other remedy provided
herein, the City reserves the right to pursue any remedy to compel or force Grantee and/or its successors
and assigns to comply with the terms hereof, and the pursuit of any right or remedy by the City shall not
prevent the City from thereafter declaring a forfeiture or revocation for breach of the conditions herein.
Section 25. City Ordinances and Regulations. Nothing herein shall be deemed to direct or
restrict the City's ability to adopt and enforce all necessary and appropriate ordinances regulating the
performance of the conditions of this franchise, including any reasonable ordinances made in the exercise
of its police powers in the interest of public safety and for the welfare of the public. The City shall have
the authority at all times to control by appropriate regulations the location, elevation, and manner of
construction and maintenance of any telecommunications facilities by Grantee, and Grantee shall
promptly conform with all such regulations, unless compliance would cause Grantee to violate other
requirements of law.
In the event of a conflict between the Municipal Code and this franchise,City Code shall control.
Section 26. Vacation. The City may vacate any City road, right-of-way or other City
property which is subject to rights granted by this franchise in accordance with state and local law. Any
relocation of telecommunications facilities resulting from a street vacation shall require a minimum of
180 days' notice as provided in section 37.
Section 27. Indemnification.
1. Grantee hereby covenants not to bring suit and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold
harmless the City, its officers, employees, agents and representatives from any and all claims, costs,
judgments, awards or liability to any person arising from injury, sickness or death of any person or
damage to property of any nature whatsoever relating to or arising out of this franchise agreement; except
for injuries and damages caused solely by the negligence of the City. This includes but is not limited to
injury:
a) For which the negligent acts or omissions of Grantee, its agents, servants,
officers or employees in performing the activities authorized by a franchise are a
proximate cause;
b) By virtue of Grantee's exercise of the rights granted herein;
c) By virtue of the City permitting Grantee's use of the City's rights-of-ways or
other public property;
d) Based upon the City's inspection or lack of inspection of work performed by
Grantee, its agents and servants, officers or employees in connection with work
authorized on the facility or property over which the City has control, pursuant to a
franchise or pursuant to any other permit or approval issued in connection with a
franchise;
Ordinance 13-011 Zayo Telecommunications Franchise Page 9 of 14
DRAFT
e) Arising as a result of the negligent acts or omissions of Grantee, its agents,
servants, officers or employees in barricading, instituting trench safety systems or
providing other adequate warnings of any excavation, construction or work upon the
facility, in any right-of-way, or other public place in performance of work or services
permitted under a franchise; or
f) Based upon radio frequency emissions or radiation emitted from Grantee's
equipment located upon the facility,regardless of whether Grantee's equipment complies
with applicable federal statutes and/or FCC regulations related thereto.
2. Grantee's indemnification obligations pursuant to subsection 1 of this section shall
include assuming liability for actions brought by Grantee's own employees and the employees of
Grantee's agents, representatives, contractors and subcontractors even though Grantee might be immune
under RCW Title 51 from direct suit brought by such an employee. It is expressly agreed and understood
that this assumption of potential liability for actions brought by the aforementioned employees is limited
solely to claims against the City arising by virtue of Grantee's exercise of the rights set forth in a
franchise. The obligations of Grantee under this subsection have been mutually negotiated by the parties,
and Grantee acknowledges that the City would not enter into a franchise without Grantee's waiver. To
the extent required to provide this indemnification and this indemnification only, Grantee waives its
immunity under RCW Title 51.
3. Inspection or acceptance by the City of any work performed by Grantee at the time of
completion of construction shall not be grounds for avoidance of any of these covenants of
indemnification. Provided, that Grantee has been given prompt written notice by the City of any such
claim, said indemnification obligations shall extend to claims which are not reduced to a suit and any
claims which may be compromised prior to the culmination of any litigation or the institution of any
litigation. The City has the right to defend or participate in the defense of any such claim, and has the
right to approve any settlement or other compromise of any such claim.
4. In the event that Grantee refuses the tender of defense in any suit or any claim, said
tender having been made pursuant to this section, and said refusal is subsequently determined by a court
having jurisdiction (or such other tribunal that the parties shall agree to decide the matter),to have been a
wrongful refusal on the part of Grantee, then Grantee shall pay all of the City's costs for defense of the
action, including all reasonable expert witness fees, reasonable attorney fees, the reasonable costs of the
City of recovering under this subsection.
5. Grantee's duty to defend, indemnify and hold harmless City against liability for damages
caused by the concurrent negligence of (a) City or City's agents, employees, or contractors, and (b)
Grantee or Grantee's agents, employees, or contractors, shall apply only to the extent of the negligence of
Grantee or Grantee's agents,employees,or contractors. In the event that a court of competent jurisdiction
determines that a franchise is subject to the provisions of RCW 4.24.115, the parties agree that the
indemnity provisions hereunder shall be deemed amended to conform to said statute and liability shall be
allocated as provided herein.
6. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this section,Grantee assumes the risk of damage
to its telecommunication facilities located in the rights-of-way and upon City-owned property from
activities conducted by the City, its officers, agents, employees and contractors, except to the extent any
such damage or destruction is caused by or arises from any willful or malicious action or gross negligence
on the part of the City, its officers, agents, employees or contractors. Grantee releases and waives any
and all such claims against the City, its officers, agents, employees or contractors. Grantee further agrees
to indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City against any claims for damages, including, but not
Ordinance 13-011 Zayo Telecommunications Franchise Page 10 of 14
DRAFT
limited to,business interruption damages and lost profits,brought by or under users of Grantee's facilities
as the result of any interruption of service due to damage or destruction of Grantee's facilities caused by
or arising out of activities conducted by the City, its officers, agents, employees or contractors, except to
the extent any such damage or destruction is caused by or arises from the sole negligence or any willful or
malicious actions on the part of the City,its officers, agents,employees or contractors.
7. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration, revocation or termination of
this franchise.
Section 28. Insurance. Grantee shall procure and maintain for the duration of the franchise,
insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in
connection with the exercise of the rights, privileges and authority granted hereunder to Grantee, its
agents,representatives or employees.
Applicant's maintenance of insurance as required by this franchise shall not be construed to limit
the liability of the Grantee to the coverage provided by such insurance, or otherwise limit the City's
recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity.
1. Automobile Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 Combined Single
Limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. This insurance shall cover all
owned, non-owned, hired or leased vehicles used in relation to this franchise. Coverage
shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute form
providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary, the policy shall be endorsed to
provide contractual liability coverage; and
2. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written on Insurance Services Office
(ISO) occurrence form CG 00 01, or a substitute form providing equivalent liability
coverage acceptable to the City, and shall cover products liability. The City shall be
named as an insured under the Applicant's Commercial General Liability insurance
policy using ISO Additional Insured-State or Political Subdivisions-Permits CG 20 12 or
a substitute endorsement acceptable to the City providing equivalent coverage. Coverage
shall be written on an occurrence basis with limits no less than $1,000,000 Combined
Single Limit per occurrence and $2,000,000 general aggregate for personal injury,bodily
injury and property damage. Coverage shall include but not be limited to: blanket
contractual; products/completed operations; broad form property; explosion, collapse and
underground(XCU); and Employer's Liability.
The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions for
Commercial General Liability insurance:
1. The Grantee's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance with respect to the City as
outlined in the Indemnification section of this franchise. Any insurance, self-insurance,
or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be in excess of the Grantee's
insurance and shall not contribute with it.
2. The Grantee's insurance shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be cancelled,
except after 30 days' prior written notice has been given to the City.
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M.Best rating of not less than A:VII.
Ordinance 13-011 Zayo Telecommunications Franchise Page 11 of 14
DRAFT
Grantee shall furnish the City with original certificates and a copy of any amendatory
endorsements,including the additional insured endorsement,evidencing the insurance requirements of the
Grantee prior to the adoption of this Ordinance.
Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies required herein shall not affect
coverage provided to the City,its officers,officials,employees or volunteers.
Section 29. Performance Bond Relating to Construction Activity. Before undertaking any of
the work, installation, improvements, construction, repair, relocation or maintenance authorized by this
franchise, Grantee, or any parties Grantee contracts with to perform labor in the performance of this
franchise, shall,upon the request of the City,furnish a bond executed by Grantee or Grantee's contractors
and a corporate surety authorized to operate a surety business in the State of Washington, in such sum as
may be set and approved by the City, not to exceed twenty-five thousand dollars, as sufficient to ensure
performance of Grantee's obligations under this franchise. The bond shall be conditioned so that Grantee
shall observe all the covenants, terms and conditions and shall faithfully perform all of the obligations of
this franchise, and to repair or replace any defective work or materials discovered in the City's road,
streets, or property. Said bond shall remain in effect for the life of this franchise. In the event Grantee
proposes to construct a project for which the above-mentioned bond would not ensure performance of
Grantee's obligations under this franchise, the City is entitled to require such larger bond as may be
appropriate under the circumstances.
Section 30. Modification. The City and Grantee hereby reserve the right to alter, amend or
modify the terms and conditions of this franchise upon written agreement of both parties to such
alteration,amendment or modification.
Section 31. Forfeiture and Revocation. If Grantee willfully violates or fails to comply with
any of the provisions of this franchise, or through willful or unreasonable negligence fails to heed or
comply with any notice given Grantee by the City under the provisions of this franchise, and an adequate
opportunity to cure the violation or non-compliance has been given in writing to Grantee, then Grantee
shall, at the election of the City, forfeit all rights conferred hereunder and this franchise may be revoked
or annulled by the City after a hearing held upon reasonable notice to Grantee. The City may elect,in lieu
of the above and without any prejudice to any of its other legal rights and remedies, to obtain an order
from the Spokane County Superior Court compelling Grantee to comply with the provisions of this
franchise and to recover damages and costs incurred by the City by reason of Grantee's failure to comply.
Section 32. Assignment. This franchise may not be assigned or transferred without the
written approval of the City, except that Grantee can assign this franchise without approval of, but upon
notice to the City to, any parent, affiliate or subsidiary of Grantee or to any entity that acquires all or
substantially all the assets or equity of Grantee,by merger, sale,consolidation or otherwise.
Section 33. Acceptance. Not later than 60 days after passage of this Ordinance, the Grantee
must accept the franchise herein by filing with the City Clerk an unconditional written acceptance thereof.
Failure of Grantee to so accept this franchise within said period of time shall be deemed a rejection
thereof by Grantee, and the rights and privileges herein granted shall, after the expiration of the 60-day
period, absolutely cease,unless the time period is extended by ordinance duly passed for that purpose.
Section 34. Survival. All of the provisions, conditions and requirements of sections: 5, 6, 7,
13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 27, 28, 29, 37, 38 and 39 of this franchise shall be in addition to any and all other
obligations and liabilities Grantee may have to the City at common law, by statute, by ordinance, or by
contract, and shall survive termination of this franchise, and any renewals or extensions hereof. All of the
provisions, conditions, regulations and requirements contained in this franchise shall further be binding
Ordinance 13-011 Zayo Telecommunications Franchise Page 12 of 14
DRAFT
upon the heirs, successors, executors, administrators, legal representatives and assigns of Grantee and
City and all privileges, as well as all obligations and liabilities of Grantee shall inure to their respective
heirs, successors and assigns equally as if they were specifically mentioned herein.
Section 35. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should
be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence,clause or
phrase of this Ordinance. In the event that any of the provisions of the franchise are held to be invalid by
a court of competent jurisdiction, the City reserves the right to reconsider the grant of the franchise and
may amend, repeal, add, replace or modify any other provision of the franchise, or may terminate the
franchise.
Section 36. Renewal. Application for extension or renewal of the term of this franchise shall
be made no later than 180 days of the expiration thereof. In the event the time period granted by this
franchise expires without being renewed by the City, the terms and conditions hereof shall continue in
effect until this franchise is either renewed or terminated by the City.
Section 37. Notice. Any notice or information required or permitted to be given by or to the
parties under this franchise may be sent to the following addresses unless otherwise specified,in writing:
The City: City of Spokane Valley
Attn: City Clerk
11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106
Spokane Valley,WA 99206
Grantee: Zayo Group,LLC
Attn: Legal Department
1805 29th Street
Boulder, CO 80301
Phone: (303) 854-5271
Facsimile: (303) 604-6869
Section 38. Choice of Law. Any litigation between the City and Grantee arising under or
regarding this franchise shall occur, if in the state courts, in the Spokane County Superior Court, and if in
the federal courts,in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington.
Section 39. Non-Waiver. The City shall be vested with the power and authority to
reasonably regulate the exercise of the privileges permitted by this franchise in the public interest.
Grantee shall not be relieved of its obligations to comply with any of the provisions of this franchise by
reason of any failure of the City to enforce prompt compliance,nor does the City waive or limit any of its
rights under this franchise by reason of such failure or neglect.
Section 40. Entire Agreement. This franchise constitutes the entire understanding and
agreement between the parties as to the subject matter herein and no other agreements or understandings,
written or otherwise, shall be binding upon the parties upon execution and acceptance hereof. This
franchise shall also supersede and cancel any previous right or claim of Grantee to occupy the City roads
as herein described.
Section 41. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after
publication of the Ordinance or a summary thereof occurs in the official newspaper of the City of
Spokane Valley as provided by law.
Ordinance 13-011 Zayo Telecommunications Franchise Page 13 of 14
DRAFT
PASSED by the City Council this day of , 2013.
Mayor,Thomas E.Towey
ATTEST:
Christine Bainbridge,City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
Office of the City Attorney
Date of Publication:
Effective Date:
Accepted by Zayo Group,LLC:
By:
The Grantee, Zayo Group, LLC, for itself, and for its successors and assigns, does accept all of
the terms and conditions of the foregoing franchise.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, has signed this day of_
,2013. Subscribed and sworn before me this day of ,2013.
Notary Public in and for the State of
residing in
My commission expires
Ordinance 13-011 Zayo Telecommunications Franchise Page 14 of 14
•;Ii.. ae, - of „. ' wilt e_ s _ ,a
olp' a fix' �•o �� `?� 1,• w
"
c. M1
iF' } L LI
AAA J{I,.e _ A . •`
Spokane,,Va
� _ ley 4. , '�".s °g. r
7 ve
:tip ji r d4d 6, n . gpP,ewal
., _.,� j . � I F; L jr.Cliy Hail 7 •f f,
E, m •
7
.
F
P �. a.e " iae
1.. -[ *Q 141.
01
E
■
n
0'b - ,,2C13Gocgle u
�,[lt`ti1l t�{��L
rcagery 7a e 9;7C 7C"11r' - -i l l 4;'1a..1 3 1'N 1 1 -1 A "1",N e e•L 2034!t _ Eye all E 1
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: August 13,2013 Department Director Approval: El
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ®new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin.report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First Reading Proposed Ordinance 13-012, Amending SVMC Title 22.60.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A.106; SVMC 17.80.150 and 19.30.040
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Administrative report
BACKGROUND: This amendment is intended to streamline and simplify development review of
outdoor lighting. This amendment will:
1. Eliminate watts per square foot limitations for parking areas and buildings;
2. Eliminate height restrictions for pole-mounted light fixtures and wall-mounted fixtures for
walkway areas;
3. Establish criteria and requirements for lighting plans and eliminate the requirement for a
photometric analysis;
4. Modify off-site light trespass standards;
5. Remove references to the Washington State Energy Code;
6. Remove outdoor arena, stadium and playfield light turn-off requirements;
7. Add two lighting exceptions.
On June 27,2013,the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the amendment.
Following public testimony and deliberations,the Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the
amendment.
On July 23,2013 staff provided an administrative report to City Council. Council consensus was to move
the amendment to a First Ordinance Reading.
OPTIONS: Proceed as proposed,or as modified;or direct staff further.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to advance Ordinance 13-012 to a second reading.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:None
STAFF CONTACT: Martin Palaniuk,Planner
ATTACHMENTS: Draft Ordinance 13-012
DRAFT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 13-012
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON AMENDING SECTIONS 22.60.020, 22.60.030, AND 22.60.050 OF THE
SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO INSTALLATION OF
OUTDOOR LIGHTING,LIGHTING PLANS, OFF-SITE LIGHT TRESPASS STANDARDS,
LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS FOR OUTDOOR ARENAS, STADIUMS, AND
PLAYFIELDS, EXCEPTIONS TO LIGHTING STANDARDS;AND OTHER MATTERS
RELATING THERETO.
WHEREAS, on September 25, 2007, the City of Spokane Valley (City) adopted Spokane Valley
Municipal Code (SVMC)Title 22,pursuant to Ordinance 07-015; and
WHEREAS,on October 28,2007, SVMC Title 22 became effective; and
WHEREAS, such regulations are authorized by RCW 36.70A; and
WHEREAS, the amendments set forth below are consistent with the goals and policies of the City's
Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS,on June 13,2013,the Planning Commission held a study session; and
WHEREAS, on June 14,2013, notice of the Planning Commission public hearing was published in the
Valley News Herald;and
WHEREAS, on June 19, 2013, the Washington State Department of Commerce was notified pursuant
to RCW 36.70A.106, providing a 60-day notice of intent to adopt amendments to the Spokane Valley
Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, SVMC 22.60.020, SVMC 22.60.030, and SVMC 22.60.050, as amended, bear a
substantial relation to the public health, safety and welfare and protection of the environment; and
WHEREAS, on June 27, 2013, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, received evidence,
information, public testimony, and a staff report with a recommendation followed by deliberations and
provided a recommendation; and
WHEREAS, on July 11, 2013,the Planning Commission approved the findings and recommendations;
and
WHEREAS,on July 23,2013, City Council reviewed the proposed amendment; and
WHEREAS, on August 13, 2013, City Council considered a first ordinance reading to adopt the
proposed amendment.
NOW,THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley do ordain as follows:
Ordinance 13-012 Page 1 of 6
DRAFT
Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend SVMC sections 22.60.020,
22.60.030,and 22.60.050.
Section 2. Findings. The City Council acknowledges that the Planning Commission conducted
appropriate investigation and study, held a public hearing on the proposed amendments and recommends
approval of the amendments. The City Council hereby adopts the findings of the Planning Commission,
specifically that:
A. Growth Management Act Policies - Washington State Growth Management Act
(GMA) provides that each city shall adopt a comprehensive land use plan and
development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive
plan.
B. City of Spokane Valley Goals and Policies-The City of Spokane Valley has adopted
goals and policies consistent with the GMA and adopted County-Wide Planning
Policies.
Land Use Policy LUP-1.2 Protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent non-
residential uses and/or higher intensity uses through the development and enforcement of
the City's land use regulations and joint planning.
Land Use Policy LUP-13.1 Maximize efficiency of the development review process by
continuously evaluating the permitting process and modifying as appropriate.
Housing Policy HP-1.1: Consider the economic impact of development regulations on the
cost of housing.
Housing Policy HP-1.2: Streamline the development review process and strive to
eliminate unnecessary time delays and expenses.
Economic Goal EDG-7: Maintain a regulatory environment that offers flexibility,
consistency,predictability and clear direction.
Economic Policy EDP-7.1: Evaluate,monitor and improve development standards to
promote compatibility between adjacent land uses; and update permitting processes to
ensure that they are equitable,cost-effective, and expeditious.
Economic Policy EDP-7.2: Review development regulations periodically to ensure
clarity,consistency and predictability.
Neighborhood Goal NG-2: Preserve and protect the character of Spokane Valley's
residential neighborhoods.
Neighborhood Policy NP-2.1: Maintain and protect the character of existing and future
residential neighborhoods through the development and enforcement of the City's land use
regulations and joint planning.
Neighborhood Policy NP-2.2: Review and revise as necessary, existing land use
regulations to provide for innovation and flexibility in the design of new residential
developments, accessory dwelling units, and in-fill development.
Ordinance 13-012 Page 2 of 6
DRAFT
Section 3. Amendment. Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 22.60.020 is amended as
follows:
22.60.020 Application.
The requirements of this chapter and the Washington Energy Code(Chapter 51 11 WAC) apply to outdoor
lighting requirements for all developments except one- and two-family dwellings and public street lighting.
(Ord. 07-015 § 4,2007).
Section 4. Amendment. Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 22.60.030 is amended as
follows:
22.60.030 General requirements.
The installation of new outdoor lighting or the extension, modification or expansion of existing outdoor
lighting is subject to the following requirements:
A. The lighting allowance for covered parking, open parking and outdoor areas shall not exceed 0.20 watts per
square foot of lot area;provided,however, that the allowance may be increased to 0.30 watts per square foot
for covered residential parking when ceilings and walls are painted or stained with a reflectance value of 0.70
or higher.
watts per square foot of building facade or 7.5 watts per linear foot of building perimeter.
C. The maximum height of pole mounted outdoor lighting fixtures shall not exceed'12 feet in Regional
Commercial and industrial zoning districts and 35 feet in all other districts.
A. All outdoor lights shall include a light source and reflector that controls the light beam so that unshielded
e light does not extends across any bounding property line between incompatible uses or into the public right-
of-way,above a height of three feet.
Ordinance 13-012 Page 3 of 6
DRAFT•7 , '..... , P TALE
firfr.r +
.'fif fr1,r 1
14`ye its
y_` %•.ti y,_,
ter.fi Ii I L.
44. rrafirai la s �isr x.
-Y.srv«r Properly '=r M41.041 e• Froprerty
rC rCrPT.AI L
YtlJ[Ar LI4rT
J,
-. 14i`71r'a r.-mp.. tr
B. Outdoor lighting fixtures shall be designed so that the light source is shielded at any bounding property
line except where topographical characteristics make this impossible.
UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE:
+911 1 41�l�Il41111i1p11,
'Lam uu5+� '
41/493::MOIL
I
F. All outdoor lighting systems shall be equipped with automatic switches conforming to the requirements of
Section 1513.6.2 of the Washington Energy Code.
C.All Aapplications for building permits for commercial development will be evaluated by the Community
Development Director to determine if a lighting plan is required to assess and mitigate impacts. The need for a
lighting plan will be based on the scope and scale of the project,compatibility with surrounding uses, and
anticipated light impacts. If required,the plan will include the following:shall be accompanied by a
photometric analysis of the lighting effects prepared by a qualified engineer.
1. A site plan showing the location of all outdoor light fixtures.
2.The type and method of shielding for each light fixture.
Ordinance 13-012 Page 4 of 6
DRAFT
H. The mounting height of walkway lighting shall not exceed 12 feet and all fixtures mounted at a height of
more than eight feet shall be fully shielded.
ID. Lighting designed to accent landscaping features or architectural elements,including the illumination of
pole-mounted flags of the United States, shall be concealed or positioned so that the light source is not visible
at adjacent property lines.
J. Lighting for outdoor arenas, stadiums and playfields shall not remain on longer than 30 minutes following
the end of the event. (Ord. 07 015 § 1, 2007).
22.60.040 Prohibited lights.
The following lights are prohibited unless a temporary permit is obtained for specific events with specific
times of operation:
A. Laser source light, strobe lights and similar high intensity light sources,except those associated with
approved activities of the City of Spokane Valley. High intensity lights for which a temporary permit is issued
shall not project above the horizontal plane nor extend into the public right-of-way.
B. Searchlights. (Ord. 07-015 § 4,2007).
Section 5. Amendment. Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 22.60.020 is amended as
follows:
22.60.050 Exceptions.
A.Navigation and airport lighting required for the safe operation of boats and airplanes.
B. Emergency lighting required by police,fire,and rescue authorities.
C. Lighting for state and federal highways authorized by the Washington State Department of Transportation.
D. Internal lighting of permitted signs.
E. Outdoor lighting for public monuments.
F. In-pool lighting for private swimming pools.
G. Holiday decorations.
Section 6. All other provisions of SVMC Chapter 22.60 not specifically referenced hereto shall
remain in full force and effect.
Section 7. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held
to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality
Ordinance 13-012 Page 5 of 6
DRAFT
shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this
Ordinance.
Section 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after
publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as
provided by law.
Passed by the City Council this day of August, 2013.
Mayor,Thomas E.Towey
ATTEST:
City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge
Approved as to Form:
Office of the City Attorney
Date of Publication:
Effective Date:
Ordinance 13-012 Page 6 of 6
DRAFT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.13-012
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON AMENDING SECTIONS 22.60.020, 22.60.030, AND 22.60.050 OF THE
SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO INSTALLATION OF
OUTDOOR LIGHTING,LIGHTING PLANS,OFF-SITE LIGHT TRESPASS STANDARDS,
LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS FOR OUTDOOR ARENAS, STADIUMS, AND
PLAYFIELDS, EXCEPTIONS TO LIGHTING STANDARDS;AND OTHER MATTERS
RELATING THERETO.
WHEREAS, on September 25, 2007, the City of Spokane Valley (City) adopted Spokane Valley
Municipal Code(SVMC)Title 22,pursuant to Ordinance 07-015;and
WHEREAS,on October 28,2007,SVMC Title 22 became effective;and
WHEREAS,such regulations are authorized by RCW 36.70A;and
WHEREAS,the amendments set forth below are consistent with the goals and policies of the City's
Comprehensive Plan;and
WHEREAS,on June 13,2013,the Planning Commission held a study session;and
WHEREAS,on June 14,2013,notice of the Planning Commission public hearing was published in the
Valley News Herald;and
WHEREAS,on June 19,2013,the Washington State Department of Commerce was notified pursuant
to RCW 36.70A.106, providing a 60-day notice of intent to adopt amendments to the Spokane Valley
Comprehensive Plan;and
WHEREAS, SVMC 22.60.020, SVMC 22.60.030, and SVMC 22.60.050, as amended, bear a
substantial relation to the public health,safety and welfare and protection of the environment;and
WHEREAS, on June 27,2013,the Planning Commission held a public hearing,received evidence,
information, public testimony, and a staff report with a recommendation followed by deliberations and
provided a recommendation;and
WHEREAS,on July 11,2013,the Planning Commission approved the findings and recommendations;
and
WHEREAS,on July 23,2013,City Council reviewed the proposed amendment;and
WHEREAS, on August 13, 2013, City Council considered a first ordinance reading to adopt the
proposed amendment.
NOW,THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley do ordain as follows:
Ordinance 13-012 Page 1 of 6
DRAFT
Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend SVMC sections 22.60.020,
22.60.030,and 22.60.050.
Section 2. Findings. The City Council acknowledges that the Planning Commission conducted
appropriate investigation and study, held a public hearing on the proposed amendments and recommends
approval of the amendments. The City Council hereby adopts the findings of the Planning Commission,
specifically that:
A. Growth Management Act Policies - Washington State Growth Management Act
(GMA) provides that each city shall adopt a comprehensive land use plan and
development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive
plan.
B. City of Spokane Valley Goals and Policies-The City of Spokane Valley has adopted
goals and policies consistent with the GMA and adopted County-Wide Planning
Policies.
Land Use Policy LUP-1.2 Protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent non-
residential uses and/or higher intensity uses through the development and enforcement of
the City's land use regulations and joint planning.
Land Use Policy LUP-13.1 Maximize efficiency of the development review process by
continuously evaluating the permitting process and modifying as appropriate.
Housing Policy HP-1.1: Consider the economic impact of development regulations on the
cost of housing.
Housing Policy HP-1.2: Streamline the development review process and strive to
eliminate unnecessary time delays and expenses.
Economic Goal EDG-7: Maintain a regulatory environment that offers flexibility,
consistency,predictability and clear direction.
Economic Policy EDP-7.1: Evaluate,monitor and improve development standards to
promote compatibility between adjacent land uses;and update permitting processes to
ensure that they are equitable,cost-effective,and expeditious.
Economic Policy EDP-7.2: Review development regulations periodically to ensure
clarity,consistency and predictability.
Neighborhood Goal NG-2: Preserve and protect the character of Spokane Valley's
residential neighborhoods.
Neighborhood Policy NP-2.1: Maintain and protect the character of existing and future
residential neighborhoods through the development and enforcement of the City's land use
regulations and joint planning.
Neighborhood Policy NP-2.2: Review and revise as necessary, existing land use
regulations to provide for innovation and flexibility in the design of new residential
developments,accessory dwelling units,and in-fill development.
Ordinance 13-012 Page 2 of 6
DRAFT
Section 3. Amendment. Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 22.60.020 is amended as
follows:
22.60.020 Application.
The requirements of this chapter and the Washington Energy Code(Chapter 51 11 WAC)apply to outdoor
lighting requirements for all developments except one-and two-family dwellings and public street lighting.
(Ord.07-015§4,2007).
Section 4. Amendment. Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 22.60.030 is amended as
follows:
22.60.030 General requirements.
The installation of new outdoor lighting or the extension,modification or expansion of existing outdoor
lighting is subject to the following requirements:
A.The lighting allowance for covered parking,open parking and outdoor areas shall not exceed 0.20 watts per
square foot of lot area;provided,however,that the allowance maybe increased to 0.30 watts per square foot
for covered residential parking when ceilings and walls arc painted or stained with a reflectance value of 0.70
B.The lighting allowance for building exteriors,including landscaping lighting,shall not exceed either 0.25
watts per square foot of building facade or 7.5 watts per linear foot of building perimeter.
C.The maximum height of pole mounted outdoor lighting fixtures shall not exceed 12 feet in Regional
Commercial and industrial zoning districts and 35 feet in all other districts.
A. All outdoor lights shall include a light source and reflector that controls the light beam so that unshielded
ee light does not extends across any bounding property line between incompatible uses or into the public right-
of-way,above a height of three feet.
Ordinance 13-012 Page 3 of 6
DRAFT
`�3 _ _ , [Formatted:Font:11 pt,Font color:Black
-V..., Pr nptt lrt.nncr'• P..,-.1,
��rlr7 •b,. r
y 1 EC:"''''''"~ti
Yarn PwpO.ty-.�n4Le h .1'wp.
EB.Outdoor lighting fixtures shall be designed so that the light source is shielded at any bounding property
line except where topographical characteristics make this impossible.
UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE
— jAtli.::•,..
Section 1513.6.2 of the Washington Energy Code.
C.411-Aapplications for building permits for commercial development will be evaluated by the Community
Development Director to determine if a lighting plan is required to assess and mitigate impacts. The need for a
lighting plan will be based on the scope and scale of the project,compatibility with surrounding uses,and
anticipated light impacts. If required,the plan will include the following:shall be accompanied by a
photometric analysis of the lighting effects prepared by a qualified engineer.
1. A site plan showing the location of all outdoor light fixtures.
2.The type and method of shielding for each light fixture.
Ordinance 13-012 Page 4 of 6
DRAFT
H.The mounting height of walkway lighting shall not exceed 12 feet and all fixtures mounted at a height of
more than eight feet shall be fully shielded.
ID.Lighting designed to accent landscaping features or architectural elements,including the illumination of
pole-mounted flags of the United States,shall be concealed or positioned so that the light source is not visible
at adjacent property lines.
J.Lighting for outdoor arenas,stadiums and playficlds shall not remain on longer than 30 minutes followin_
the end of the event.(Ord.07 015§1,2007).
22.60.040 Prohibited lights.
The following lights are prohibited unless a temporary permit is obtained for specific events with specific
times of operation:
A.Laser source light,strobe lights and similar high intensity light sources,except those associated with
approved activities of the City of Spokane Valley.High intensity lights for which a temporary permit is issued
shall not project above the horizontal plane nor extend into the public right-of-way.
B.Searchlights.(Ord.07-015§4,2007).
Section 5. Amendment. Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 22.60.020 is amended as
follows:
22.60.050 Exceptions.
A.Navigation and airport lighting required for the safe operation of boats and airplanes.
B.Emergency lighting required by police,fire,and rescue authorities.
C.Lighting for state and federal highways authorized by the Washington State Department of Transportation.
D.Internal lighting of permitted signs.
E. Outdoor lighting for public monuments.
F. In-pool lighting for private swimming pools.
G. Holiday decorations.
Section 6. All other provisions of SVMC Chapter 22.60 not specifically referenced hereto shall
remain in full force and effect.
Section 7. Severability. If any section,sentence,clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held
to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality
Ordinance 13-012 Page 5 of 6
DRAFT
shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this
Ordinance.
Section 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after
publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as
provided by law.
Passed by the City Council this day of August,2013.
Mayor,Thomas E.Towey
ATTEST:
City Clerk,Christine Bainbridge
Approved as to Form:
Office of the City Attorney
Date of Publication:
Effective Date:
Ordinance 13-012 Page 6 of 6
Spokane Valley Planning Commission
APPROVED Minutes
Council Chambers — City Hall, 11707 E. Sprague Ave.
June 13, 2013
I. CALL TO ORDER
Chair Dates called the meeting to order at 6:O() p.m.
IL PLEUCE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance
III. ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONERS Present Absent CITY STAFF
Bill Bates-Chair x John Holtman, Coin Development Director
Joe Stoy— Vice Chair x r- Marty Palaniuk, Planner
Steven Neill x Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney
Kevin Anderson x
Mike Phillips x -
Robert McCaslin x I�
Christina C'arlsen x C'ari i iinshaw, Secretary
IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Commissioner Soy moved to approve the agenda as presented. a .second war oracle and the
rrrutlun passed unanimously.
V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner- Neill moved to approve the May 23, 2013 minutes as presented a second was
made and the notion passed unanimously.
VI. PUBLIC COMMENT
There was no public comment.
VII. COMMISSION REPORTS
VIII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
Community Development Director John I lohman went over the advance agenda. Ile stated that
the creation of the development regulations have pushed their abilities to the limits because of
Planning Cu E 55 ion Min tiles Page I of n
all the different rewrites. There were seven different versions from the consultant before they
decided to go a different direction in-house, and then five different versions after that. He
stated that they arc at a point where they have done the best job they can do with this particular
material and that it was very complex. There will be various experts at Tuesday night's Joint
PIanning Commission/City Council meeting to help walk through all of it.
IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS
A. Unfinished Business: CTA-2013-0004, Sign Code Amendments.
A pending/postponed motion is on the table from the May 23, 2013 Planning
Commission Meeting:
Motion: Commissioner Stoy moved to approve and forward to the City Council CTA-2013-
1)011W as presented, a,Second was made.
Community Development Director John I lohman provided a short recap of the changes,
which are as follows:
1. 22.110.030 Permit required, paragraph C, item 3. (The location of all existing signs fir
the subject applicant including size and height). Subject Applicant was added.
2. 22.1 10.030 Permit required, paragraph D. In the last draft, there was an item 2. (2.
Special inspection agency agreements,signed by the owner and special inspection
agency are required for sign construction with concrete over 2500 psi, on site
welding, or high strength bolting.) Item 2 was removed. Mr. Hohman stated that at
the public hearing Mr, Wineinger slated that it was his experience that special
inspection agreements were not typically required. Mr. Hohman stated he discussed it
with the City's Building Official Doug Powell. Mr. Powell talked to the jurisdictions of
Cheney, Spokane, Spokane County, and Liberty Lake to get a feel for what they are
doing. Mr. Hohman explained that what staff came up with was that special inspection
agreements are only required in three different areas.
• If a sign co mpany conies forward with something completely out of the
ordinary that is typically not seen, like a large sign with a strange cantilever
structure or something else that would cause some questions.
• Extremely large pole signs that are not typical as well that have some
additional bracing or other issues that might make staff believe special
inspections are required.
• Replacement of existing billboards - those inspections are required.
Beyond the three items, it is not typical to have a special inspection agreement done,
Therefore, Item 2 was removed and, the following was added to Item 1: (Where
special conditions exist for any type of sign, the Building Official is authorized to
require additional construction documents to be prepared by a Washington State
licensed engineer and /or special inspections if deemed necessary.) Mr. I lohman
stated that this would provide the flexibility in case the City was to encounter one of the
three out of the ordinary situations, then the City could require special inspections.
3. 22.1 10.050 Temporary Signs, paragraph E, item 3. (Signs may only be displayed
During business hours. It' business hours continue) was removed and replaced with;
(If the sign is displaced past daylight hours, precautions should be taken to place the
sign in a lighted area.)
Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 (4'6
4. 22.110,090 Sign location and front setbacks, paragraph F, was changed to; (All new
freestanding signs shall comply with SVMC 22.70.039 (J).) Mr. Holtman stated that
be located and landscaped area was removed as well as the second sentence.
Commissioner Carlsen read the attached statement to the Planning Commission regarding
CTA-2013-0004. Commissioner Stoy responded that most of the businesses that
Commissioner Carlsen highlighted are destination locations and they do not need exposure
the way temporary signs would highlight an unknown brand new business; everyone knows
where Fred Meyer is (Sullivan), 1 l said he thinks the worst-case scenario was put out there
and that there are several business that have been there for large amount of time, and
everybody knows that they are there. lIe stated that there is a possibility that there could be
two hundred signs out there but that would probably never happen and you cannot tie
somebody's hands because he has a little lot with a hundred foot of frontage, to one sign.
Commissioner Carlsen stated that the purpose of a temporary sign is not to advertise your
business; the purpose is to advertise a special. or a daily deal. The temporary sign is not
meant to be the sign to draw people into your business. She continued that any strip mall
with any number of tenants could have the same problem and said she does not think a
temporary sign is going to change the nature of the business. Commissioner Bates stated
that temporary signs in Some instances are the lifeblood of a small business and through his
experience; he knows you can get traffic in a store if temporary signs arc done properly.
There are so many empty retail and businesses that we as a City have a big job to get
business in there. He stated that he is for doing anything within reason to help a business
survive and prosper. Commissioner Anderson stated that the worst-case scenario is always
possible with any rule or zone and that if it did happen then there is always the option to
say it can't continue because of any clutter. The City still has the ability to talk to the
business and let them know they are making a mess out of the area or with the code or we
can go out and stiffen it up.
Commissioner Neill moved to amend the original motion to approve and recommend C{TA-
2013-0004 to City Council to read, "as presented by staff' with the ,Jour• amendments
recommended by Planning Commission and shown in the draft of the proposed text
amendments provided to the Commission tonight. 'A second iras made, 6 in favor, 1
against (Commissioner Carlsen).
Commissioner Carlsen stated she meant to vote yes to amending the motion. Commissioner
Bates stated that they needed to revote on the last motion. Deputy City Attorney Erik Lamb
stated that someone needs to make a motion to re vote and make the record clear that
Commissioner Car lsen wishes to vote affirmatively on that motion to amend the original
motion.
Commissioner Stoy moved to rescind the amended motion CTA-2013-0004, A second was
made and the motion passed unanimously.
Re-vote:
Commissioner Neill moved to amend the motion to approve and recommend CTA-2013-
0004 to City Council to read. as presented by staff wiwitlh the ,folk' alnendrncnts
recommended by Planning Commission and shown in the draft of the proposed text
Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 6
amendments provided to the Commission tonight. "A second lr'a.S made and the motion
passed unanimously.
Note: The amendments are:
1. 22.1/0.030 C (4): to read: The location of all existing signs on the site for the subject
applicant including size and height.
2. 22.110.030 D (2): tii'as proposed.: Special inspection agency agreements, .signed by the
owner and special inspection agency area required or sign construction re'itl► concrete
over 2500 psi, on site welding, or high strength halting. Then replaced with (1):
Where special conditions exist for any type of sign, the Building Official is
authorized to require additional construction documents to be prepared by c►
Washington State licensed engineer and/or special inspections if deemed necessary.
3. 22,110.050 E (3) was proposed.' Signs may only be displayed during business hours.
If business hours continue. Then replaced with: If the sign is displaced past daylight
how's, p1'ecautions should be taken to place the sign in a lighted area
4. 22.110.090 F: to read:rill new freestanding signs shall comply with S VMC 22.70.030
(J). be located and landscaped area was removed also the second sentence.
The pending motion:
Commissioner Stoy moved to approve and.forward to the City Council C7A-2013-0004 as
amended, a second was made. Vote on the motion as amended: six in favor and one
opposed. The amended motion passed.
B. New Business:
Study Session: CTA-2013-0005, Outdoor Lighting Standards
Planner Marty Palaniuk provided an overview of the materials for the Outdoor Lighting
Standards and \vent over the proposed changes as attached in the drab materials for
Chapter 22.60 Outdoor lighting standards:
Mr. Palaniuk stated that the outdoor lighting standard does not apply to one or two-family
dwellings and public street lighting. He covered the background of l wattage and lumens,
which is the measure of the brightness of a light and stated that over the last several years
technology has changed. The old incandescent bulb at 40 watts would only put out 550
lumens and now there arc compact florescent light bulbs that require much less wattage but
actually create the same amount of lumens. This is important to the text amendment that is
being proposed. He stated a new Washington State Energy code would be enacted in July.
All of the new development will have to comply with the Washington State Energy Code.
See attached Chapter 22.60 I'or proposed changes.
Commissioner Neill asked if there was going to be a stipulation that shows at what point an
audit is triggered to have somebody come in and inspect. Mr. Palaniuk stated that during
the pre-application phase of development, the scope, scale and surrounding uses are looked
at or if there are any anticipated impacts from light trespass. Therefore, if the Building
Department felt that was going to happen, then they would require it at the lighting plan.
Deputy City Attorney Erik Lamb stated there is potential legal concern when there is no
criteria and you have unfettered discretion or there are no guiding principles for when that
Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 6
lighting plan is required, there are potential legal pitfalls with that. The three potential
criteria that Mr. Palaniuk listed could work well and still allow discretion from the building
department as to when the lighting plan is required without locking them into having a
lighting plan. Commissioner Stay asked if it was going to affect existing developments.
Mr. Palaniuk stated it would only effect developments after the amendments occur. it will
not go back to prior developments. Commissioner McCaslin asked if you need a permit to
change a light bulb for commercial projects, Community Development John llolvnan
stated that the City does not handle electrical components; it is the Department of Labor
and Industries that handle electrical permits. What the City would do in the case of an
addition or just installing new lighting, is look towards compliance with the energy code to
make sure that those units that were specified comply with our code. He stated, that what
this new amendment is looking at doing is handing most of it off to the review of the
energy code, maybe requiring a lighting plan in the larger developments or the ones
adjacent to residential, where the City would be more concerned about the location of the
lights and whether they are shielded or not. This is a big scaling back of out regulations.
Commissioner Anderson used a scenario that if you develop a mall parking lot, does the
City currently have a limitation on how much energy that they could use to light the mall
parking lot? Mr, Palaniuk said yes they do have to meet the provisions in the Washington
State Energy Code, That is what they are primarily trying to deal with is how much energy
you consume with your lighting. This concerns the luminosity and how bright the site gets
and the impacts of that brightness on the surrounding uses or adjacent properties,
Commissioner Bates talked about the zoning and new developments changes for going
from residential to the multi-family. He asked if we are getting into developer agreements
again, if we do not have criteria for lighting. Mr. Palaniuk responded that it needs to be
discussed whether they want to change the City to a responsible official like the building
official or the Community Development Director and whether or not they want to include
some criteria if they want to include that lighting plan. Such as the scope and scale of the
project, the surrounding uses if there is residential than we should require a lighting plan, or
if there is a sports arena or light industrial project, then the Planning Commission can add
them in there. Commissioner Bates stated that we are still in the Study Session and that it
might be a discussion to have after the public hearing. Mr. Palaniuk responded that he
could bring back another draft. Commissioner Stay asked if a multi-family would be
considered a commercial development. Mr. Palaniuk responded yes it would be subject to
this regulation. Deputy City Attorney Erik Lamb stated that if it is the Commissions' desire
to have criteria in the regulation then he could get that for them and staff could come back
with the changes before the public hearing. Commissioner Bates asked how everyone felt
about the criteria. Commissioner Anderson stated there are two things: we need criteria,
and then you have a designation of an individual. He asked if the Planning Commission is
qualified to designate that individual. Mr. Palaniuk stated that the City's Building Official
is the one who oversees the City's development pre-app meetings. He said he might he the
likely choice. Commissioner Stay agreed with Mr. Palaniuk as far as the Building Official
having the authority, but thinks they should also define the scope and scale similar to the
landscaping requirements. Commissioner Bates agreed and asked Mr. Palaniuk to come
back with some criteria for requiring a lighting plan. Commissioner McCaslin asked if
there have been any complaints regarding current outdoor lighting standards. Mr. Hohman
and Mr. Palaniuk said they had no complaints from the public. Commissioner Anderson
Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 6
commented on the public right away in the General requirements. He said we do not want
horizontal lights or bright lights affecting drivers on a roadway but said he would not be
against light laminating the sidewalk of a road or an alley from commercial property. He
asked if it is a stiff rule or an open rule. Mr. llohman responded that they are talking about
unshielded light and what they are trying to avoid is something like a spot light that would
blind you as a motorist or anything that would cause traffic safety concerns as opposed to
unshielded light that may illuminate part of the right-of-way. Commissioner Carlsen stated
that at the beginning Mr. Palaniuk said he is going to remove the reference to the
Washington State Energy Code. Mr. Palaniuk stated they are coming out with a new energy
code July 1st. Commissioner Bates asked if there was a criteria for the brightness of lights
on billboards. Mr. Palaniuk stated that is under the sign code and it does reference it needs
to be down loaded and that the bulbs cannot show. Flashing signs are prohibited. Mr.
Hohman stated that he would look to amend the notice to include some of the language
changes that Mr. Palaniuk talked about in his presentation. Therefore, at the public hearing,
there will be some criteria and the designated individual will be in the language. He said if
we could not amend the notice to the public, then they will bring some options forward for
the Planning Commission deliberations.
X. COOL) OF THE ORDER
There was nothing for the good of the order.
Xl. ADJOURNMENT
The being no other business the meeting was adjourned at 7:20 p.m.
gr)
1 �
L
Bill Bates,Bates, Chairperson
Carl Hinshaw, PC Secretary
Date signed 6/77 .
Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 6
I believe that the current code is sufficient for businesses to advertise their
specials. According to the intent of temporary signage, they are meant to be
"posted in conjunction with the alteration, construction, sale, or lease of real
property." In essence TEMPORARY signs for a TEMPORARY purpose. Our current
code offers free of cost options for business to provide notice for temporary
events. Currently businesses are allowed an A-frame sign and either a banner,
reader board, or two flags with copy. This is in addition to the permanent signs
also on the premises. Furthermore, businesses are allowed to get a permit for
additional signage to include "event" style advertising for up to 4 months of each
year.
As this new code has not even been enforced for a full year, I don't think it is
prudent to change the code again so quickly. I think that it would be wise to let
the code remain for a longer length of time, to ascertain if there are needs for
more signs.
In addition, temporary signage is not intended to keep a company in business,
and I do not believe that an additional temporary sign will make or break any of
our cities businesses. There are many ways to have effective advertising and
marketing, and businesses have opportunities to pursue them.
To address a concern brought up at our last meeting, I do not believe that
temporary signs help with the locating of businesses. And if businesses are using
temporary signs for these purposes, then they are not following the intent of
usage of temporary signs. In the context of finding businesses, I think that more
temporary signs will detract from the permanent signs and address markings.
Another note about signage, I agree that in theory one more sign per business
doesn't sound like that much of a change, but when I drive down some of our
main streets, I am overwhelmed by the sheer number of signs that are present.
There are real estate signs, there are political signs by the handful, there are
dancing tooth paste tubes and slices of pizza, Jiffy Lube and tire store employees
waving.
I have prepared a couple visual examples of the differences between the current
code and the proposed changes.
` f, , /3, Q/
P/annt/7 �Jfr44r.S.fr0n" ,
Example A
Example B
In discussing this issue with citizens, comments that I heard related to the
difficulty of finding businesses, especially along Sprague Avenue. The concerns
were that there aren't adequate numbering signs along the street, and those on
the businesses are too small or too far from the street to be useful.
Additional concerns are that excess of flags and banners are distracting to drivers
along some busy streets, and some trees along streets obscure not only signs and
addresses, but buildings as well.
My suggestion would be to let the current code stand until next year, to give
enough time for the businesses to determine if they do need more signs.
I would also be open to amending the current code with language stating that
those with a certain length of frontage to be allowed to have an additional sign.
As to the length of frontage, I would need more research on determining an
appropriate length. An example would be if your business has less than 100 feet
of frontage, you get one banner, reader board, or two flags with copy, and if you
have more than 100 feet you would get the option of two of the items.
To quote the Community Development Department's Business Guide to Keeping
Spokane Valley Beautiful
"We understand that running a business is challenging, and that adequate signage
is critical to communicate with your customers. At the same time, we know
business owners recognize the need to keep signage, especially movable and
temporary signage, from overwhelming the image of our business areas.
Ultimately, the future of Spokane Valley relies on a balance between supporting
the businesses that serve our community, and protecting the quality of life that
will attract the residents and major employers who will patronize those
businesses."
f ___ . —. ..
■
4 I-
' I
L 1 .1, _1,,411 , t II ilik
YS4 ,
lk 11k . ,
, . .4Fir7
, , ,, ,• r, ,,
, . ....t; , .
, , ..11' "..... F ' 'Al/Iht 0
tqi
, .....,..
.441wi.
, .. . ,.c4 ,.r v.,s,
..:ii.,,.. *; � A a)
4.
/ ' tO"' f ' 4 ■ 01
f 40
v
A i-
4`� � t • 44,..
lio
I� -
A _4 ,, czsci.) .<
''anti '
ar', '4A ..,. 71- bl) ;•>-
In- c.)
5
,,,' ' %,,,i' ..
rl 00 C
r
, A . \ 4ii , a)
,. 1 0• I ` 1 —
!w3 }, r1 i Co }i + 4 I 1
%1• -- i
•
t Wit. M, a>4_,...
. . ' fe 4 ,.. . . . .„.E 0 u vw o
Q a 3 A_ o .Y Aka '
\ r o
rl
V.' !! At '44111.1111111.?/
1
id o
cl
11.11141/4 a
cd
.P n` -. r r
lillipik I ,;"' a.)
vc
ilkiiir
L
a.3
a,
N
rq
Z 1 r r cri
'N 1 Lal TAI,. ' au c ) o
.,, L J b N
c
k , • HO
,,,
w 5r'� " � _i ry� •
4 41
kn
1' 111;114 %
c.,,,9
' '.4.!..A - 4,111Mii 11111:1141111.1111111itl' " .4
c) <
1 .,:e‘'.
�`?, .71-11r) FDA
•
e:
'' r �" 4]
* - -° w ct
�:1 F1..1
y r--1 00 0
`` 1 k ) r1 C ,
y :A
( ,,,,,, . ,..ii4, \L , _.,,, , . . . p...,
< 9 )4,'A AddidiAirlill:44 1 .
n
W - t
1r vi E D Q ,, • I t,� f I [d R.
II
, , 4 ,
ou y,.+
/4N)Isi $ ai
ilikl 101/11111' 1 4::;' n
4,si 4( ril r. 'U o
I
1°rt '1,P4
ca
140\ a 'Fi3 C4
,„
Nit ..„,
9 • 4 i
E
Ili
401/C.P/1
; ' J c a a_ 2 N...k ,,,i
41
G .2 2 O
I v a, . ,..., ,__. 0
... , , ...I, _ _ ,_ ,.„
iir 74C,,,
lip c)
$ r N ct
. :.0,, ..i, \
t _____it
•�' '�4, M „d
< ai
' t �t
cid - E
E CD
L \-_. ft------ x .4 t--
. V. ', ‘,-.
•I ,i f1li*T`4 'i .''►• ^I `'M.-"'1 '' �. `,, ,1 L_
.. •" 5 1 2#±17..1 I' ,
a I� r J�� �'.
ji" !F `�` x.14 1 iI ► cC
—: '1 I1!:�Fr fit, `r,' %. ' 'i • F r`� e 1 ��
I LJ
Y AkN
{
i i 1 7 I i I I I h • ,'
.' t
111 E, rif.. 1)4
i .• -- " } , ei, ,sz,
' ,I ' .-..� i++ '4 'tit 1r ,T,r` +1
i ` ,.
1 l C1
3i:,-* i 4 .,....,..ilrii i a - i
•
4 1 '4 `( 4D k d'* c
cfl LIB I `t I T' FL q
.0 q+ ki J I m Ste.' fr ct
.0 # .% li l'' ' 'l ,—.1 cr) tin
,7 ..1," ilt, jci .... ..., ,A . Sol ti ' , 1,„ •' L ] L V 11Q 1 . .I �t M ^ V) cyp
,—I
1 0 Ici ` a,s ti • '}• •
c`1 W O ^-"
I
• g ,—, ,7r. c„, (.. ) a)
�� 1 U n Ill
4 d' N Cd
Ili I
y l y
M: it ' Ill ,-- cid i ; . I
. 11 3 ,
,�
CO
..,-_,,,,, PY21 Vi rigt-alzi pris I Mire`
1 E L) (t o, Aii , . ns
i_ vin Li.j)ik•odiei till ',7 a
.I ii pi k?.
t
44( , i '74' I !' I
1 ! w
' •' a w
f" #l]{„
13,.. Ai i■.* tit .`` co V
1 �. I ii r 1 t t 4 'h �. s -.1, ,6 v
N i ^O a Y
+ I # . od
., 4
o
0.J ] 1" t, 1 G Cpl 2
e l -1 -1; , cn} a al
i+ �° t f rJ {4 A v o!1
w fibaN:Iitt
F bra i� N Y.�n! "o a T g , a E
Y •5I , , i 10:1111110 1 7■ r11 1 h O Ct. 1
rn
------icY*
k [ r b- N
r-1 Cin tin
. 4 -4, 4Y- . ..04 ,.... . ct
... ..71_ !... ,7_-_-; 4.6,
, P t;I:N1,;i - '" 4/1 ik#, iljti ., *7 yeti ',..C) ,---1 $a., ---;_,
�, O A'
f NA NJ► dr. , ' ` -
-
r- - O
di y d
N
! 1 fi 4 as. AL 411t 4 X --* b--1
. it i ' ' cr) rn (7.) ' cf)
-' -',9 ,iii
Li F: 4s ; ' :* ; t :
rj
L e..r n �l -
-�r � � ,� 1.f 1 IL .1-
tn
CI
e Si Ck
1 1,. „ r
SU c C3 a -' F J ` I '
lE C �6 O t' ' Ji i p bJ7
} �,'] in
3
0 Si
(Z4 rd + 0, ! E .-
/ Illiitinipti 40 ° cd
* 01)
p w
''' Firarsamaisie.". ..,pb,
'. 4
b b
i 46),,, , - `! e ,�1 a
E.
sa
1 ` 43. �C
4 ' tg W
, r ., „ `b°j %,,p,,_•---
N
i '11 r + r' L V V7 c Z .a
J.d ` • R7-:_fi':• �, fit It. ` �. = OA = CQ
'J ;? OA = N G
�` Q— 1 jrtil t
7 rr�r+ O A g I,_ 0
i. . u 'v v :r r
V a 1 , a rl o
i* 1 f- 1-y its! , 4 Olt [. rn N Vl H• 1
2,i;i40,,
r
I n
t f'it lifk' AS. Il a .r.,)
I >—
: 7 C t...,,,„..,4 ki,,,....f-t. .4 t-t' ,....1'r .--,
l�n '�
5 , } ` r 1,.Al 0 rte{ 1:•1
,./, -
."....fte..,..0‹ te \ ok _ . . , 0 r.,: .•.:. . 4.1 cn re)
ok ' 1 ' . • ” 0 0 .-644 Cr) . tE" >
Irr 44 i ,
fi ---..: g 1 1
loll
1 , , , ,- , c, rz-,
0 1 ' . 0 its i „Ft A ,
II, ; .i• .4'', CI') Cr) .C.4)
'11 '_. 8,1.,,
. ..,
n , .
• ;1 - it .-1 Cd
con
is f'' r
CZt
H-The- a+r+th g-height-o-w ►4kway4ighting th-„ot-axseed-12 feet-and-all-f+ t
of-more-than-eigfa-f-feet shall be-fay-shielded:
I. Lighting designed to accent landscaping features or architectural elements, including the illumination of
pole-mounted flags of the United States, shall be concealed or positioned so that the light source is not
visible at adjacent property lines.
J -L+g*$ting f„, ou door nd-p4a3 fields-shall not-Facnai ecthan-3 -m-mutes
followi tg-t n4— event-(ate-0 15§ 1, 2007).
22.60.040 Prohibited lights.
The following lights are prohibited unless a temporary permit is obtained for specific events with specific
times of operation:
A. Laser source light, strobe lights and similar high intensity light sources, except those associated with
approved activities of the City of Spokane Valley. High intensity lights for which a temporary permit is
issued shall not project above the horizontal plane nor extend into the public right-of-way.
B. Searchlights, (Ord. 07-015 §4, 2007).
22.60.050 Exceptions.
A, Navigation and airport lighting required for the safe operation of boats and airplanes.
B. Emergency lighting required by police, fire, and rescue authorities.
C. Lighting for state and federal highways authorized by the Washington State Department of
Transportation.
D. Internal lighting of permitted signs.
E. Outdoor lighting for public monuments.
F. In-pool liahtinq for private swimming pools
G. Holiday decorations (Ord. 07-015 §4, 2007).
22.60.060 Temporary lighting.
The building official may authorize temporary exceptions not to exceed 30 days for good cause shown.
(Ord. 07-015§ 4, 2007).
CTA-2013-0005 Proposed Text Amendment Page 13
Spokane Valley Planning Commission
APPROVE-1D Minutes
Council Chambers — City ball, 11707 E. Sprague Ave.
.tune 27, 2013
I. CALL TO ORDER
Chair Bates called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance
III. ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONERS Present Absent CITY STAFF
Bill Bates- Chair x Scott Kuhta, Planning Manager
Joe Stoy— Vice Chair x Marty Palaniuk, Planner
Steven Neil! x -- Cary Driskell,City Attorney
Kevin Anderson x r
Mike Phillips x I—
Robert MeCaslin
Christina Carlson x Can Hinshaw, Secretary
Planning Commissioners agreed to excuse Commissioner Stoy from the Planning Commission
Meeting.
IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Commissioner [arisen melded to approve t1w agenda as presented, a second was made toned the
motion passed unanimously.
V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner Neill moved to approve the dune 13, 2013 minutes as presented, a second was
made and the motion passed unanimously.
VI. PUBLIC COMMENT
There was no public comment.
VII. COMMISSION REPORTS
Commissioner Anderson and Commissioner Carlsen attended the Regional Short Course at the
City of Spokane. Commissioner Carlsen stated there was a lot of good information and wished
there were more that would have attended. She said there were many aspects of City Planning
that she had not wrapped her head around yet and the speakers did a good job at presenting the
Planning Commission Minutes Page I of
information, Commissioner Bates attended the City of Spokane Valley budget session and the
Joint Session on the Shoreline. He stated it was good to have a joint meeting and he
complimented the staff on what a good job they did.
VIII. ADMINiSTRATIVE REPORTS
Planning Manager Kuhta reviewed the advance agenda. I lc stated that the plan is to focus on
the Shoreline Master Plan issues. There is not a lot of detail to the advance agenda due to
waiting to see how the S M I' issues plays out.
IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS
A. Old Business:
Findings of Fact: CTA-20134)004, Sign Code Amendments
(.'oamnissioner Neill moved lo approve and forward to City Council CTA-2013-0004 as
presented. A second was made,
Discussion: None
Planning C'oa?umssiwn Pole was to,forward to the City Council us presented. the motion was
passed rnnaitinruusly,
B. New Business:
Presentation: Spokane Regional Transportation Council.
Senior Transportation Planner Ryan Stewart provided an overview of the I lorizon 2040
effort. Under Federal regulations, one requirement is to develop a metropolitan
transportation plan. This is a twenty-year minimum look into the future. It will be the blue
print for the entire county of what they want transportation to look like over the next
twenty plus years. lie went over the Regional priorities, their vision, forecasting the
population and employment.
C. Unfinished Business:
Commissioner 13.ites opened the I'uhlie Bearing at 7:03 PM
Public I-Tearing and Deliberations: C'I'A-2013-0005.
Planner Marty Palaniuk provided an overview of the materials for the Outdoor Lighting
Standards and went over the proposed changes as attached in the draft materials fot-
Chapter 2 2.60 Outdoor lighting standards.
Commissioner Phillips asked if "lights on billboards" was in the sign code ordinance.
Planning Manager Kuhta read the regulation as follows: Sign code section of the municipal
code 22.11 0.060 General Provisions: Electronic signs shall be permitted on the same basis
as other signs. All electronic message centers arc required to have automatic dimming
capabilities that adjust the brightness to the ambient light at all times of the day and night.
Mr. Kuhta stated there is suppose to be written documentation when people conk in for a
permit to install their sign. It does not talk about a specific standard, it talks about dimming
capabilities.
Planning C:uiiilnission Minutes Page 2 of 3
Commissioner Bates discussed criteria, His concern was about the maximum pole height.
He asked if the Planning Director would determine the height of each individual project
based on his knowledge of zoning and could we have different heights of poles in the City?
Planner Palaniuk responded with yes. Commissioner Bates discussed treating people fairly
by one of them not being able to put up the kind of fixture that he/she wanted verses
somebody else. He stated that maybe regulating it based on zoning would be good. Mr.
Palaniuk responded that the only purpose of the decision criteria is to decide whether a
lighting plan is required. He does not think it is going to limit the height of the pole. The
City is going to allow the developer to conic in and provide the information. The only
requirement the City will have is that the light be shielded off the site. The intent of the
changes is to allow more flexibility for the developer.
Commissioner Bates closed the Public Hearing at 7:20 Pr"i
Commissioner Neill moved to approve and'inward to the City Council CTi1-2013-0005 as
presented, a second'vas made
Discussion: Commissioner Anderson stated he will support the plan, but from a personal
standpoint, he said he could understand rules about minimal lighting for public areas or
parking lots that are all safety related, Ile does not like the idea that we would restrict
private people from how much electricity they use or pay for on their own properly. The
state of Washington has taken it upon itself to put rules for that. From Commissioner
Anderson's standpoint, he stated the cost of electricity would control what people do with
their money. He is amazed at the thought process (not created by this City) in that we
would restrict people from doing whatever lighting process they wanted as long as it was
not a safety hazard.
Planning Commission Action: to forward to the City Council as presented, the motion
Wa.s passed unaniragnarsly.
X. GOOD OF THE ORDER
There was nothing for the good of the order.
Xl. ADJOURNMENT
The being no other business the meeting was adjourned at 7:22 p.m.
Bill Bates, Chairperson
.1/
1
d{--e4
Can Hinshaw, PC Secretary
Date signed 7 / /f l/--.?
Planning C0111111 ission Minutes Page 3 of 3
ATTACHMENT D
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION:
OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION
July 11,2013
The following findings are consistent with the Planning Commission's decision to recommend approval.
Background:
I. Spokane Valley development regulations were adopted in September 2007 and became effective on
October 28, 2007.
2. The City-initiated text amendment proposes to amend Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC)
22.60 to streamline the outdoor lighting standards by eliminating the watts per square foot lighting
limit, eliminating redundant provisions, eliminating the requirement for a photometric plan, adding a
requirement for a lighting plan if deemed necessary by the building division, eliminating outdoor
recreation facility requirements, and adding two additional exemptions.
3. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 27, 2013 and voted 6-0 to recommend
approval of the amendment to City Council.
Planning Commission Findings:
1. Compliance with SVMC 17.80.159F Approval Criteria
a. The proposed City-initiated code text amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of
the Comprehensive Plan;
Finding(s):
i. Land Use Policy LUP-1.2 Protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent non-residential
uses and/or higher intensity uses through the development and enforcement of the City's land
use regulations and joint planning.
ii. Land Use Policy LUi'-13.1 Maximize efficiency of the development review process by
continuously evaluating the permitting process and modifying as appropriate.
iii, Housing Policy HP-1.1: Consider the economic impact of development regulations on the
cost of housing.
iv. Housing Policy HP-1.2: Streamline the development review process and strive to eliminate
unnecessary time delays and expenses.
v. Economic Goal EDG-7: Maintain a regulatory environment that offers flexibility,
consistency, predictability and cleat'direction.
vi, Economic Policy EDP-7.I: Evaluate, monitor and improve development standards to promote
compatibility between adjacent land uses; and update permitting processes to ensure that they
are equitable, cost-effective, and expeditious.
vii. Economic Policy EDP-7.2: Review development regulations periodically to ensure clarity,
consistency and predictability.
viii. Neighborhood Goal NG-2: Preserve and protect the character of Spokane Valley's residential
ticighborhoods,
ix, Neighborhood Policy NP-2.1: Maintain and protect the character of existing and future
residential neighborhoods through the development and enforcement of the City's kind use
regulations and joint planning.
x. Neighborhood Policy NP-2.2: Review and revise as necessary,existing land use regulations to
provide for innovation and flexibility in the design of new residential developments, accessory
dwelling units, and in-fill development.
Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission Page 1 oft
ATTACHMENT D
b. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare, and
protection of the environment.
Find
i. The proposed amendment will streamline the outdoor lighting development review process
and provide flexibility in lighting choices. The requirement to shield lighting trespass will
minimize glare and mitigate off-site impacts.
ii. The public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment are furthered by
ensuring that the City's development regulations are consistent with goals and policies in the
adopted Comprehensive Plan.
2. Conclusion(s):
a. The proposed city initiated code text amendment is consistent with the City's adopted
Comprehensive Plan and the approval criteria contained in SVMC 17.80.150(F).
b. The Growth Management Aet stipulates that the comprehensive land use plan and development
regulations shall be subject to continuing review and evaluation by the City.
Recoin in cii(I at ions:
The Spokane Valley Planning Commission therefore recommends City Council adopt the proposed City-
initiated code text amendments to SVMC 22.60 as attached.
Appioved this 1 rr''Mday of July,2013
ill Bates,Chairman
A't'lTST
e'"1- • /
.1
Cai•i Hinshaw,Administrative Assistant
Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission Page 2 of 2
ATTACHMENT E
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
Sjkane
.uii Valle STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
CTA-2013x0005
STAFF REPORT DATE: July 11,2013
HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: June 27, 2013, 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley City Hall Council
Chambers, Valley Redwood Plaza Building, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 101, Spokane Valley,
Washington 99206.
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: A City-initiated text amendment proposing to amend Spokane Valley
Municipal Code (SVMC) 22.60 to streamline the outdoor lighting standards by eliminating the
watts per square foot lighting limit, eliminating redundant provisions, eliminating the
requirement for a photometric plan, adding a requirement for a lighting plan if deemed necessary
by the building division, eliminating outdoor recreation facility requirements, and adding two
additional exemptions.
PROI'oNI:N'I': City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department, 11707 E Sprague Ave,
Suite 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206
APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC)
Title 17 General Provisions,
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDA'T'ION: The Planning Division recommends the Planning Commission
approve the proposed amendments as put forth,
STAFF PLANNER: Martin Palaniuk, Planner, Community Development Department
REVIEWLU BY: Scott Kuhta, AICP, Planning Manager, Community Development Department
A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
1. APPLICATION PROCESSING: SVMC Chapter 17.80, Permit Processing Procedures. The
following summarizes application procedures for the proposal,
Process Date
Pre-Application Meeting: N/A
Application Submitted: N/A
Determination of Completeness: N/A
Published Notice of Public Hearing: 6/14/2013
Sent Notice of Public Hearing to staff/agencies: 6/14/2013
Posted Notice of Public Hearing 6/14/2013
Staff Report and Recommendation Ct'A-2013-0005
2. PROPOSAL BACKGROUND: The proposal is to modify Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC)
Chapter 22.60, Outdoor Lighting Standards. The intent is to streamline the development review
process and remove unwarranted lighting requirements.
The proposed amendment will eliminate the lighting limits for covered parking, open parking and
outdoor areas, These areas were limited to 0.20 watts per square foot of lot area. Newer lighting
fixture technology has made the use of input wattage as a measure of brightness,or luminosity,
outdated. New lighting fixtures have increased the lumens, a measure of the amount of
brightness a light fixture emits, while reducing the amount of watts required. limiting the watts
per square foot is an inconsistent method of limiting the brightness emanating from a site.
The amendment will also remove the lighting limits on building exterior and landscape lighting.
The current code limits the watts per square foot of building façade or per linear foot of building
perimeter.
Restrictions on the maximum height of pole-mounted outdoor lighting fixtures are removed as
part of the proposed amendment. This requirement did not seem reasonable based on a new
proposed standard of not allowing any unshielded light trespass to occur between incompatible
uses. In order to meet the new standard, development should self-limit the height of light poles.
The proposed amendment changes the previous standard of no light trespass across any
bounding property line between incompatible uses or into the public right-of-way. It is difficult
for development to completely eliminate all light trespass. Staff is not trained or educated to
evaluate or measure whether proposed development is meeting the no light trespass standard,
The new standard will require that no unshielded light trespass may occur across the boundary,
seeking to eliminate the glare from outdoor lighting while allowing some light trespass to occur.
This standard appears to be consistent with surrounding jurisdictions.
Development is required to meet all the requirements of the Washington State Energy Code.
Restating the requirements in the SVMC is redundant. The amendment will remove these
redundant references.
The current SVMC requires any application for development to submit a photometric analysis of
the lighting effects prepared by a qualified engineer. The reason was to determine if any lighting
trespass would occur across the bounding property lines. The proposed amendment will require
the Community Development Department to evaluate the development application during the pre-
application phase of the permit process and determine if a lighting plan will be required. I1'a
lighting plan is required than it must show the location of the fixtures and type of shielding being
used. A photometric analysis will not be required because the new applicant no longer must
show that no light trespass will occur on adjacent properties.
The proposed amendment removes the restriction on the height of walkway lighting. Walkway
lighting will still require shielding to eliminate off-site glare.
The proposed amendment will eliminate the requirement for outdoor arenas, stadiums and
playl`ields to turn off lighting within 30 minutes of completing an event. This requirement has not
been actively enforced and no compliance issues have arisen.
Two additional exceptions to the outdoor lighting standards will be added as part of the proposed
amendment; in-pool lighting for private swimming pools and holiday decorations.
B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE TEXT
AMENDMENT
1. Compliance with Title 17 (General Provisions) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code
a. Findings:
SVMC 17.80.150(F)Municipal Code Text Amendment Approval Criteria
Page 2of4
Staff Report and Recommendation CTA-20I3-0005
L The City may approve Municipal Code Text amendment, if it finds that
(1) The proposed text amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the
Comprehensive Plan;
Staff Analysis: The proposed amendment is consistent with the applicable policies
of the Comprehensive Plan. The amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive
plan goals for encouraging a mix of commercial and residential uses, providing
affordable housing options, maintaining a flexible and consistent regulatory
environment, and preserving and protecting neighborhoods.
Relevant Comprehensive Plan goals and policies are shown below:
Land Use Policy-1.2 Protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent non-
residential uses and/or higher intensity uses through the development and
enforcement of the City's land use regulations and joint planning.
Land Use Policy -13.1 Maximize efficiency of the development review process by
continuously evaluating the permitting process and modifying as appropriate,
i Iousing Policy HP-I.1: Consider the economic impact of development regulations
on the cost of housing.
Housing Policy 1-IP-1.2: Streamline the development review process and strive to
eliminate unnecessary time delays and expenses.
Economic Goal ED€i-7: Maintain a regulatory environment that offers flexibility,
consistency, predictability and clear direction.
Economic Policy EDP-7.1: Evaluate, monitor and improve development standards to
promote compatibility between adjacent land uses; and update permitting processes
to ensure that they are equitable, cost-effective, and expeditious.
Economic Policy EDP-7.2: Review development regulations periodically to ensure
clarity,consistency and predictability.
Neighborhood Goal NG-2: Preserve and protect the character of Spokane Valley's
residential neighborhoods.
Neighborhood Policy NP-2.1: Maintain and protect the character of existing and
future residential neighborhoods through the development and enforcement of the
City's land use regulations and joint planning.
Neighborhood Policy NP-2.2: Review and revise as necessary, existing land use
regulations to provide for innovation and flexibility in the design of new residential
developments, accessory dwelling units, and in-fill development.
(2) The proposed amendment hears a substantial relation to public health, safety,
welfare, and protection of the environment;
Staff Analysis: The amendment bears substantial relation to public health, safety,
welfare and protection of the environment. The proposed amendment will streamline
the outdoor lighting development review process and provide flexibility in lighting
choices. The requirement to shield lighting trespass will minimize glare and mitigate
off-site impacts.
b. Conclusion(s):
The proposed text amendment is consistent with the approval criteria contained in the SVMC.
Page 3 of 4
Staff Report and Recommendation ($TA-2013-0005
2. Finding and Conclusions Specific to Public Comments
a. Findings:
No public comments have been received to date.
b. Conclusion(s):
Public noticing was completed for CTA-2013-0005 on June 14,2013.
3. Finding and Conclusions Specific to Agency Comments
a. Findings:
No agency comments have been received to date,
b. Conclusion(s):
No concerns are noted.
C. OVERALL CONCLUSION
The proposed code text amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plans policies and goals.
D. STA FE RF,C()147 MEN DATION
The Planning Division, after review and consideration of the applicable approval criteria,
rccomtnertds the approval of the proposed amendment to eliminate the maximum watts per square
foot requirement, eliminate references to the Washington State Energy Code, remove height
restrictions on pole-mounted and walkway lighting, eliminate. the no light trespass standard and
replace it with a no unshielded light trespass standard, eliminate the requirement for a photometric
analysis and replace it with a lighting plan if required by the building division, eliminate the 30
minute turn-off after an event requirement for outdoor arenas, and except in-pool swimming pool
lighting and holiday decorations from the outdoor lighting standards.
Page 4 of 4
\SV-FS21UserslmcaihounlCity DepartmentslFinancelSurpluslRCA 2013 0813 admin rprt on equip surplus.docx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: August 13, 2013 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information admin. report ❑ pending legislation [' executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Administrative report on Resolution 13-XXX which declares as surplus
furniture and equipment that is inoperable, obsolete or in excess of our needs.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: City Code 3.40.070
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None
BACKGROUND: The City last declared property surplus to its needs in July 2009 and since that
time has accumulated a number of pieces of office furniture and a variety of equipment that have
reached the point of being inoperable, obsolete or excess to our current operating needs. These
include items such as computer monitors and workstations, file cabinets, chairs, two broken pianos
at CenterPlace and two 2003 S10 pickups.
City Code 3.40.070 provides guidance for the disposal of surplus City equipment. A short summary
follows:
1. The City Council declares property to be surplus to the City if it has no practical, efficient or
appropriate use to the City, or is damaged, inoperable or obsolete, and the cost of repairing the
property is uneconomical or impractical.
2. The Finance Director provides notice of the potential disposition of property to the other City
Departments and if they desire to acquire any of the surplus property it will be transferred to
them.
3. The Finance Director is authorized to dispose of remaining surplus equipment via public
auction, bid or other method of sale on terms deemed to be in the best interest of the City.
4. If surplus equipment is unsellable it may be discarded as scrap.
Our goal is to dispose of the surplus items by selling what we can and discarding what we cannot,
in a manner that minimizes the use of City resources.
OPTIONS:
1. Authorize staff to sell or otherwise dispose of surplus items in a manner deemed to be in the
best interest of the City.
2. Retain some or all of the items recommended as surplus to the City's needs.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: No action is required at this time but we are asking for
Council consensus to address this as a formal action item at the August 27, 2013 Council meeting.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: We anticipate some of the items we are recommending for
disposal can be sold but a number of pieces have no apparent value. We anticipate that total
revenues received will exceed total costs of disposal
STAFF/COUNCIL CONTACT: Mark Calhoun, Finance Director
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 13-XXX.
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO.13-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON,DECLARING CERTAIN PERSONAL PROPERTY OF THE
CITY SURPLUS TO THE NEEDS OF THE CITY,AUTHORIZING DISPOSAL
OF THE SAME,AND OTHER MATTERS RELATED THERETO.
WHEREAS,the City has accumulated various items of personal property necessary for operation
of City Hall since the previous declaration of surplus items on July 14, 2009, such as office furniture and
computer equipment, which are no longer useful or usable for their intended purpose; and
WHEREAS, the City would like to dispose of these items that are unneeded or not useful to the
City; and
WHEREAS, the City adopted Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 3.40.070, which
prescribes a process for disposing of surplus City equipment; and
WHEREAS, the City has followed the process set forth in SVMC 3.40.070 and now desires to
formally declare the items surplus and dispose of them pursuant to City Code.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL SPECIFICALLY RESOLVES AS SET FORTH BELOW:
Section One: Declaration of items of personal property surplus to the needs of the City. The City
Council hereby declares that all remaining unclaimed items(See Exhibit 1 to this Resolution)are declared
surplus to the need of the City, as they have no practical, efficient or appropriate use to the City, or is
damaged, inoperable or obsolete, and the cost of repairing the same is uneconomical or impractical.
Section Two: Authorization to dispose of surplus property. The Finance Director is authorized to dispose
of the surplus personal property identified in Exhibit 1 to this Resolution as set forth in SVMC
3.40.070(C):
Sale of Property. Following passage of a resolution by the city council declaring property surplus,
the finance director is authorized to sell surplus property in the following manner:
1. Upon a finding by a department director that the property is surplus to City use, the
finance director shall provide notice of potential disposition to other City departments. If
any department director desires to acquire and use the proposed surplus property, the
property may be transferred to the requesting department director, or other authorized
representative.
2. If no request for use of proposed surplus property is received,the finance director may
proceed to dispose of the same by public auction, bid, or other method of sale on terms
deemed to be in the best interests of the City.
3. Surplus personal property which is unsellable because of obsolescence, wear and tear,
or other reasons may be dismantled, if necessary, and sold as scrap. Surplus personal
property which has no marketable value or use may be discarded as refuse.
Section Three: Repeal. To the extent that previous Council motions or resolutions are inconsistent with
those set forth herein,they are repealed.
Section Four: Effective Date. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect upon adoption.
Pass by the City Council this day of August,2013.
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Thomas E. Towey,Mayor
ATTEST: Approved as to form:
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Office of the City Attorney
\\SV-FS2\Users\mcalhoun\City Departments\Finance\Surplus\Resolution 13-000 Exhibit 1
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA
Resolution#13-000
Exhibit 1
List of Surplus Equipment
Dell Laptop bag
Office Chair
Office Chair
Office Chair
Office Chair
Office Chair
Office Chair
Compaq Evo PC
Compaq Evo PC
Compaq Evo PC
Compaq Eva PC
Compaq Evo PC
HP Compaq
Compaq Evo PC
Compaq Evo PC
Compaq Eva PC
Compaq Evo PC
Compaq Evo PC
Compaq Evo PC
Compaq Evo PC
HP Compaq
HP Compaq
HP Compaq
Compaq Evo PC
Compaq Evo PC
Compaq Evo PC
HP Compaq
HP Compaq
HP Compaq
HP Compaq
Dell 500 SC
HP Compaq
HP Workstation 6400
HP
none
Grey tall chair
Red chair
Red chair tall
Red chair short
Light red chair
blue chair
usw32604rq
6x31-kn8z-60d0
w303kn8za258
w303kn8za288
6x31-kn8z-60tg
uswa3105b6
w233kn9zb305
usw32d04nm
w302kn8ze589
u sw32004m p
w313kn8zc814
w313kn8zc79d
6x31-kn8z-60d3
2ub5330d92
2ub5200j0m
2ub5200jqh
usw32004p3
usw32604rp
w233kn9zb335
w233kn9zb264
w233kn9zb262
2ub53209fm
mx184804f7
dc41x11-ALT ID
2ub53209fl
2ua74519ks
mx184804f6
Bag
Chair
Chair
Chair
Chair
Chair
Chair
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Page 1 of 7
181 None
129 None
130 None
131 None
132 None
133 None
134 None
2 000061 2006
3 000035 2006
4 000056 2006
5 000039 2006
6 000037 2006
7 000112 2006
8 000011 2006
9 000069 2006
10 000036 2006
11 000024 2006
12 000026 2006
13 000028 2006
14 000057 2006
15 000139 2006
16 000145 2006
17 000131 2006
18 000023 2006
19 000027 2006
20 000017 2006
21 000031 2006
22 000018 2006
26 000143 2006
27 000266 2006
28 None 2006
30 000142 2006
31 000188 2006
32 000269 2006
COSV
Estimated Date
Description
Serial Number/Alt.ID
Item
Lot#
' Asset Tag#
of Acquisition
Dell Laptop bag
Office Chair
Office Chair
Office Chair
Office Chair
Office Chair
Office Chair
Compaq Evo PC
Compaq Evo PC
Compaq Evo PC
Compaq Eva PC
Compaq Evo PC
HP Compaq
Compaq Evo PC
Compaq Evo PC
Compaq Eva PC
Compaq Evo PC
Compaq Evo PC
Compaq Evo PC
Compaq Evo PC
HP Compaq
HP Compaq
HP Compaq
Compaq Evo PC
Compaq Evo PC
Compaq Evo PC
HP Compaq
HP Compaq
HP Compaq
HP Compaq
Dell 500 SC
HP Compaq
HP Workstation 6400
HP
none
Grey tall chair
Red chair
Red chair tall
Red chair short
Light red chair
blue chair
usw32604rq
6x31-kn8z-60d0
w303kn8za258
w303kn8za288
6x31-kn8z-60tg
uswa3105b6
w233kn9zb305
usw32d04nm
w302kn8ze589
u sw32004m p
w313kn8zc814
w313kn8zc79d
6x31-kn8z-60d3
2ub5330d92
2ub5200j0m
2ub5200jqh
usw32004p3
usw32604rp
w233kn9zb335
w233kn9zb264
w233kn9zb262
2ub53209fm
mx184804f7
dc41x11-ALT ID
2ub53209fl
2ua74519ks
mx184804f6
Bag
Chair
Chair
Chair
Chair
Chair
Chair
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Page 1 of 7
181 None
129 None
130 None
131 None
132 None
133 None
134 None
2 000061 2006
3 000035 2006
4 000056 2006
5 000039 2006
6 000037 2006
7 000112 2006
8 000011 2006
9 000069 2006
10 000036 2006
11 000024 2006
12 000026 2006
13 000028 2006
14 000057 2006
15 000139 2006
16 000145 2006
17 000131 2006
18 000023 2006
19 000027 2006
20 000017 2006
21 000031 2006
22 000018 2006
26 000143 2006
27 000266 2006
28 None 2006
30 000142 2006
31 000188 2006
32 000269 2006
\\SV-FS2\Users\mcalhoun\City Departments\Finance\Surplus\Resolution 13-000 Exhibit 1
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA
Resolution#13-000
Exhibit 1
List of Surplus Equipment
Description
Serial Number/Alt.ID
Item T
Lot#
Asset Tag#COSV
Estimated Date
of Acquisition
HP Workstation 6400
HP Workstation 6400
HP Compaq
HP Compaq
HP Workstation 6400
HP
HP Compaq
HP Compaq
HP Compaq
HP Compaq
HP Compaq
HP Compaq
HP Workstation 6400
HP Compaq
HP Compaq
HP Workstation 6400
HP Compaq
HP Workstation 6400
HP Compaq
HP Workstation 8400
HP Workstation 6200
HP Workstation 6200
HP Workstation 6200
HP Workstation 6200
HP Workstation 6000
HP Workstation 6400
HP Workstation 6400
HP Workstation 6000
HP Workstation 6000
HP Compaq
HP Compaq
HP Workstation 6400
HP Workstation 6400
HP Workstation 6400
2ua6190zy9
2ua5090km5
xm16140h8q
2u b5200j0j
2ua632014z
2ua74519ks
2ub5200j0k
2ub5310c72
mx154805zg
mx184804f8
mx172101f7
mx16070c2w
2ua80717fh
mx16300j5s
mx16140h23
2ua7070v5v
mxI6130nhf
2ua7470186
mx17210If5
2ua6430hxf
2ua5090km6
2ua525038d
2ua6201665
2ua5090km4
usv3410cxr
2ua7070v5w
2ua7470cvr
usv3410cxt
usv4390cIq
mx172101f6
mx17210If8
2ua7470cvs
2ua8100216
2ua52000yf
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Computer PC
Page 2 of 7
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
67
68
000153
000127
000151
000132
000160
000270
000136
000137
000146
000267
000171
000149
000195
000157
000150
000167
000154
000181
000175
000164
000126
000134
000156
000125
000042
000166
000183
000043
000113
000173
000174
000182
000191
000129
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
\\SV-FS2\Users\mcalhoun\City Departments\Finance\Surplus\Resolution 13-000 Exhibit 1
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA
Resolution#13-000
Exhibit I
List of Surplus Equipment
Description
Serial Number/Alt.ID
Item
Lot#
COSY
Asset Tag#
Estimated Date
of Acquisition
Compaq Monitor 9500
HP Workstation 6400
Large cork board
Large cork board
Medium cork board
4 drawer filing cabinet
4 drawer filing cabinet
4 drawer filing cabinet
4 drawer filing cabinet
4 drawer filing cabinet
4 drawer filing cabinet
4 drawer filing cabinet
4 drawer filing cabinet
4 drawer filing cabinet
4 drawer filing cabinet
4 drawer filing cabinet
4 drawer filing cabinet
4 drawer filing cabinet
4 drawer filing cabinet
4 drawer filing cabinet
4 drawer filing cabinet
4 drawer filing cabinet
4 drawer filing cabinet
4 drawer filing cabinet
4 drawer filing cabinet
4 drawer filing cabinet
4 drawer fi ling cabinet
5 drawer filing cabinet
6 drawer filing cabinet
4 drawer filing cabinet
7 drawer filing cabinet
HP Keyboards USB-New
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
cn245ym145
2ua8020hp5
none
none
none
#2
#15
#21
#3
#5
not able to see#
not able to see#
#23
#26
#25
#28
#35
#34
#29
#32
#36
#18
#16
#12
#13
#17
#20
#31
#27
#24
#33
lic#090714035569
bc2ab0fvbxklcx
bc2abofvbxklcn
Computer PC
Computer PC
Cork Board
Cork Board
Cork Board
Filing Cabinet
Filing Cabinet
Filing Cabinet
Filing Cabinet
Filing Cabinet
Filing Cabinet
Filing Cabinet
Filing Cabinet
Filing Cabinet
Filing Cabinet
Filing Cabinet
Filing Cabinet
Filing Cabinet.
Filing Cabinet
Filing Cabinet
Filing Cabinet
Filing Cabinet
Filing Cabinet
Filing Cabinet
Filing Cabinet
Filing Cabinet
Filing Cabinet
Filing Cabinet
Filing Cabinet
Filing Cabinet
Filing Cabinet
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Page 3 of 7
73
117
198
199
203
66
70
71
72
75
77
78
80
81
82
84
89
90
91
92
93
102
103
104
105
106
177
178
179
194
205
25
136
137
None
000187
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
2006
2006
2007
2007
\\SV-FS2\Users\mcalhoun\City Departments\Finance\Surplus\Resolution 13-000 Exhibit 1
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA
Resolution#13-000
Exhibit 1
List of Surplus Equipment
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards-Used
HP Keyboards-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards-Used
HP Keyboards-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-New
HP Keyboards USB-New
HP Keyboards USB-New
HP Keyboards USB-New
HP Keyboards USB-New
HP Keyboards USB-New
HP Keyboards USB-New
HP Keyboards USB-New
bauhpOgcpzuvb5
bc2ab0fvbxklcq
bc2ab0fvbxkld5
bc2abObluuefdc
b93abOaluta8cl
b77420avb2tp81
bc2abObluuefdl
bc2abofvbxklcp
bc2abofvbxklcl
bc2abofbxklcm
bc2abOfvbxklcl
b77420aIpgn3vz
bc2aa0dvbvrn95
bc2aa0dvbrn98
b39aboavbj9xlt
bauhpoigaorbkc
bauhpoivbzrkl5
bc2abObluuefdl
bc2ab0fvbxxlcv
bauhpOgdpzw0y0
bcrabOfbxklcu
b77420avbrg7e6
bc2abOfbxklcy
b55680dganklpe
b55680fgaO3alp
b55680fga03aks
bauhpOlga0r5bd
bauhp01gaorbje
Iic#090714035491
Iic#090714035553
Iic#090714035554
Iic#090714035481
Iic#090714035496
Iic#090714035497
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Page 4 of 7
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
COSV
Estimated Date
Description
Serial Number/Alt.ID
Item
Lot#
Asset Tag#
of Acquisition
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards-Used
HP Keyboards-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards-Used
HP Keyboards-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-Used
HP Keyboards USB-New
HP Keyboards USB-New
HP Keyboards USB-New
HP Keyboards USB-New
HP Keyboards USB-New
HP Keyboards USB-New
HP Keyboards USB-New
HP Keyboards USB-New
bauhpOgcpzuvb5
bc2ab0fvbxklcq
bc2ab0fvbxkld5
bc2abObluuefdc
b93abOaluta8cl
b77420avb2tp81
bc2abObluuefdl
bc2abofvbxklcp
bc2abofvbxklcl
bc2abofbxklcm
bc2abOfvbxklcl
b77420aIpgn3vz
bc2aa0dvbvrn95
bc2aa0dvbrn98
b39aboavbj9xlt
bauhpoigaorbkc
bauhpoivbzrkl5
bc2abObluuefdl
bc2ab0fvbxxlcv
bauhpOgdpzw0y0
bcrabOfbxklcu
b77420avbrg7e6
bc2abOfbxklcy
b55680dganklpe
b55680fgaO3alp
b55680fga03aks
bauhpOlga0r5bd
bauhp01gaorbje
Iic#090714035491
Iic#090714035553
Iic#090714035554
Iic#090714035481
Iic#090714035496
Iic#090714035497
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Page 4 of 7
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
\\SV-FS2\Users\mcalhoun\City Departments\Finance\Surplus\Resolution 13-000 Exhibit 1
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA
Resolution#13-000
Exhibit 1
List of Surplus Equipment
HP Keyboards USB-New
HP Keyboards USB-New
HP Keyboards USB-New
HP Keyboards USB-New
HP Keyboards USB-New
Monitor Compaq 5017
HP Monitor P930
Compaq Monitor 9500
Compaq Monitor 9500
Compaq Monitor 9500
Compaq Monitor 9500
Compaq Monitor 9500
Compaq Monitor 9500
Compaq Monitor 9500
HP Monitor P930
HP Monitor P930
HP P1230 Monitor
Hp Monitor P950
Hp Monitor P950
HP Monitor P930
HP Monitor P930
HP Notebook Stand
HP Notebook Stand
Piano at CenterPlace-Gulbransen
Piano at CenterPlace-Cable-Nelson
Plannar PL1910M
Toshiba Port Replicator Ill Plus
Toshiba Port Replicator Ill Plus
Toshiba Port Replicator Ill Plus
Toshiba Port Replicator Ill Plus
Toshiba Port Replicator Ill Plus
Toshiba Port Replicator III Plus
Panasonic CFNEB512 Port Replicator
Toshiba Express Port Replicator
lic#090714035498
lic#090714035499
lic#090714035500
lic#090714035552
lic#090714035492
221bn64yj499
248gf23nb382
cn 245ym 167
cn245ym169
cn303x1539
cn247yb210
cn247yb214
nc247yb211
cn316xd686
cn314yu119
cn314yu116
cnv428006v
248gf23nb384
248gf23nb391
248gf23nb390
248gf23nb388
bfox0c051200gi
bfOx0f082300r8
n/a
n/a
a1507f29754
16012735
65160304
85204056
64051186
65160297
74063140
ab012346ktsa3409r
66018071
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Notebook Stand
Notebook Stand
Piano
Piano
Planner
Port Replicator
Port Replicator
Port Replicator
Port Replicator
Port Replicator
Port Replicator
Port Replicator
Port Replicator
Page 5 of 7
172
173
174
175
176
1
76
79
83
85
86
87
88
94
95
96
97
98
99
69
74
126
127
n/a
na
100
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
2006
2005
2005
COSV
Estimated Date
Description
Serial Number/Alt.ID
Item
Lot#
Asset Tag#
of Acquisition
HP Keyboards USB-New
HP Keyboards USB-New
HP Keyboards USB-New
HP Keyboards USB-New
HP Keyboards USB-New
Monitor Compaq 5017
HP Monitor P930
Compaq Monitor 9500
Compaq Monitor 9500
Compaq Monitor 9500
Compaq Monitor 9500
Compaq Monitor 9500
Compaq Monitor 9500
Compaq Monitor 9500
HP Monitor P930
HP Monitor P930
HP P1230 Monitor
Hp Monitor P950
Hp Monitor P950
HP Monitor P930
HP Monitor P930
HP Notebook Stand
HP Notebook Stand
Piano at CenterPlace-Gulbransen
Piano at CenterPlace-Cable-Nelson
Plannar PL1910M
Toshiba Port Replicator Ill Plus
Toshiba Port Replicator Ill Plus
Toshiba Port Replicator Ill Plus
Toshiba Port Replicator Ill Plus
Toshiba Port Replicator Ill Plus
Toshiba Port Replicator III Plus
Panasonic CFNEB512 Port Replicator
Toshiba Express Port Replicator
lic#090714035498
lic#090714035499
lic#090714035500
lic#090714035552
lic#090714035492
221bn64yj499
248gf23nb382
cn 245ym 167
cn245ym169
cn303x1539
cn247yb210
cn247yb214
nc247yb211
cn316xd686
cn314yu119
cn314yu116
cnv428006v
248gf23nb384
248gf23nb391
248gf23nb390
248gf23nb388
bfox0c051200gi
bfOx0f082300r8
n/a
n/a
a1507f29754
16012735
65160304
85204056
64051186
65160297
74063140
ab012346ktsa3409r
66018071
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Keyboards
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Notebook Stand
Notebook Stand
Piano
Piano
Planner
Port Replicator
Port Replicator
Port Replicator
Port Replicator
Port Replicator
Port Replicator
Port Replicator
Port Replicator
Page 5 of 7
172
173
174
175
176
1
76
79
83
85
86
87
88
94
95
96
97
98
99
69
74
126
127
n/a
na
100
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
2006
2005
2005
\\SV-F52\Users\mcalhoun\City Departments\Finance\Surplus\Resolution 13-000 Exhibit 1
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA
Resolution#13-000
Exhibit 1
List of Surplus Equipment
Toshiba Express Port Replicator
Power Cords to PC 19
HP 8150DN
Brother MFC-8840D
HP Laserjet 1300
HP Laserjet 1000 Series
NEC Projector LT260
Sharp XE-A101
Sharp XE-A101
Sharp XE-A101
x6026261
cords
Associated Systems 21796
u61036d503208
cnbjf65098
cnbj213703
2x00581ne
58032024
58078846
68017094
HP Storage works MSL5000 Series Library 3g32lbv3Ihy1
Toshiba Tablet PC-Tecra
Toshiba Tablet PC-Tecra
Toshiba Tablet PC-Tecra
Toshiba Tablet PC-Tecra
Toshiba Tablet PC-Portege
Toshiba Tablet PC-Tecra
HP Compaq C8000
Hp Compaq NC8230
Dell Inspiron 5150 w/bag and
Dell Inspiron 5100 w/bag and
Dell Inspiron 5100 w/bag and
Dell Inspiron 5100 w/bag and
power cord
power cord
power cord
power cord
Dell lnspiron 5100 w/bag and power cord
HP Lap top bag/Panasonic CF-51 w/
power cord
Toshiba Tecra
Toshiba Tecra
65109716h
65109767h
16014626h
86107168h
34054049pu
z6095252h
cnu4190v3k
cnu51707q3
34394384737
24258347929
34682279401
26447122153
32917002985
dfqx3993xa
86107167h
x5056986h
Port Replicator
Power Cords
Printer
Printer
Printer
Printer
Projector
Register
Register
Register
Series Library
Tablet PC
Tablet PC
Tablet PC
Tablet PC
Tablet PC
Tablet PC
Tablet PC
Tablet PC
Tablet PC
Tablet PC
Tablet PC
Tablet PC
Tablet PC
Tablet PC
Tablet PC
Tablet PC
Page 6 of 7
116
135
29
101
107
193
192
23
24
65
180
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
None
None
000029
None
None
None
000141
None
None
None
None
TABLET4
TABLETS
000148
000159
000109
000165
000106
000128
000321
000054
000067
000097
None
000170
000158
None
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
COSV
Estimated Date
Description
Serial Number/Alt.ID
Item
Lot#
Asset Tag#
of Acquisition
Toshiba Express Port Replicator
Power Cords to PC 19
HP 8150DN
Brother MFC-8840D
HP Laserjet 1300
HP Laserjet 1000 Series
NEC Projector LT260
Sharp XE-A101
Sharp XE-A101
Sharp XE-A101
x6026261
cords
Associated Systems 21796
u61036d503208
cnbjf65098
cnbj213703
2x00581ne
58032024
58078846
68017094
HP Storage works MSL5000 Series Library 3g32lbv3Ihy1
Toshiba Tablet PC-Tecra
Toshiba Tablet PC-Tecra
Toshiba Tablet PC-Tecra
Toshiba Tablet PC-Tecra
Toshiba Tablet PC-Portege
Toshiba Tablet PC-Tecra
HP Compaq C8000
Hp Compaq NC8230
Dell Inspiron 5150 w/bag and
Dell Inspiron 5100 w/bag and
Dell Inspiron 5100 w/bag and
Dell Inspiron 5100 w/bag and
power cord
power cord
power cord
power cord
Dell lnspiron 5100 w/bag and power cord
HP Lap top bag/Panasonic CF-51 w/
power cord
Toshiba Tecra
Toshiba Tecra
65109716h
65109767h
16014626h
86107168h
34054049pu
z6095252h
cnu4190v3k
cnu51707q3
34394384737
24258347929
34682279401
26447122153
32917002985
dfqx3993xa
86107167h
x5056986h
Port Replicator
Power Cords
Printer
Printer
Printer
Printer
Projector
Register
Register
Register
Series Library
Tablet PC
Tablet PC
Tablet PC
Tablet PC
Tablet PC
Tablet PC
Tablet PC
Tablet PC
Tablet PC
Tablet PC
Tablet PC
Tablet PC
Tablet PC
Tablet PC
Tablet PC
Tablet PC
Page 6 of 7
116
135
29
101
107
193
192
23
24
65
180
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
None
None
000029
None
None
None
000141
None
None
None
None
TABLET4
TABLETS
000148
000159
000109
000165
000106
000128
000321
000054
000067
000097
None
000170
000158
None
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
\\SV-FS2\Users\mcalhoun\City Departments\Finance\Surplus\Resolution 13-000 Exhibit 1
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA
Resolution#13-000
Exhibit 1
List of Surplus Equipment
General Dynamics GoBook VR-Z
HP Compaq NC 8000
2003 Chevy 5-10 Truck
2003 Chevy 5-10 Truck
IBM Wheel Writer 3
Large White Board
Large White Board
Large White Board
Medium white board
Medium white board
Medium white board
zzgeg7361zz2125
cnu419Ovc4
1GCCS19H338170574
1GCCS19HX38160768
1.3567E+13
none
none
none
none
none
none
Tablet PC
Tablet PC
Vehicle
Vehicle
Wheel writer
Whiteboard
Whiteboard
Whiteboard
Whiteboard
Whiteboard
Whiteboard
190
191
204
205
128 None
195 None
196 None
197 None
200 None
201 None
202 None
None
000087
2007
2007
2003
2003
COSV
Estimated Date
Description
Serial Number/Alt.ID
Item
Lot#
Asset Tag#
of Acquisition
General Dynamics GoBook VR-Z
HP Compaq NC 8000
2003 Chevy 5-10 Truck
2003 Chevy 5-10 Truck
IBM Wheel Writer 3
Large White Board
Large White Board
Large White Board
Medium white board
Medium white board
Medium white board
zzgeg7361zz2125
cnu419Ovc4
1GCCS19H338170574
1GCCS19HX38160768
1.3567E+13
none
none
none
none
none
none
Tablet PC
Tablet PC
Vehicle
Vehicle
Wheel writer
Whiteboard
Whiteboard
Whiteboard
Whiteboard
Whiteboard
Whiteboard
190
191
204
205
128 None
195 None
196 None
197 None
200 None
201 None
202 None
None
000087
2007
2007
2003
2003
11SV-FS21UserslmcalhounlBurlgets120141RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint presentatlons12013 08 1312013 08 13
RCA Est 2014 rev and exp.docx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: August 13, 2013 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information®admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Estimated 2014 revenues and expenditures.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: State budget law,
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: No formal Council action has been taken on the 2014
Budget. A proposed budget is currently under review by the City Manager who will present his
Preliminary 2014 Budget to the Council on September 17, 2013.
BACKGROUND: This marks the second occasion where the Council will discuss the 2014
Budget. The first occurred during the June 18, 2013 Council Retreat where the Council
reviewed 2014 Budget worksheets prepared by Staff. By the time the Council is scheduled to
adopt the 2014 Budget on October 22, 2013, you will have had an opportunity to discuss it on
seven separate occasions, including two public hearings to gather input from citizens:
• June 18 Council Budget Retreat
• August 13 Admin report: Estimated 2014 revenues and expenditures
• August 27 Public hearing #1 on 2014 revenues and expenditures
• September 17 City Manager's presentation of preliminary 2014 Budget
• September 24 Public hearing #2 on 2014 Budget
• October 8 First reading on ordinance adopting the 2014 Budget
• October 22 Second reading on ordinance adopting the 2014 Budget
State law requires that the City hold a public hearing on revenue sources for the upcoming
year's budget in order to consider input from the public. This hearing is scheduled to take place
on August 27th. The presentation this evening is an administrative report leading up to the
public hearing. All of the figures currently included in the 2014 Budget worksheets are
preliminary and subject to change by the City Manager until his September 17 presentation of
the 2014 Budget,
2014 Budget Overview:
• The 2014 Budget currently includes appropriations of $55,667,742 including $9,402,435 in
capital expenditures, comprised in-part of:
o $5,501,601 in Fund #303 Street Capital Projects.
o $262,500 in Fund #309 Park Capital Projects.
o $2,275,584 in pavement preservation including $888,823 financed by the General Fund.
o $1,196,000 in Fund #402 Stormwater Management projects.
o $90,000 in Fund #501 Equipment Rental and Replacement for the acquisition of three
half-ton pick-ups.
• Budgets will be adopted across 20 separate funds.
1
1SV-FS21UserslmcalhounrBudgets120141RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint presentations2013 08 1312013 08 13
RCA Est 2014 rev and exp.docx
• The full time equivalent employee (FTE) count will increase by 2.0 employees from 85.25 in
2013 to 87.25 in 2014. The two additional employee include:
o A 1.0 FTE help desk technician in the Finance Department. Cost of this position is
budgeted at $64,996 which will be offset by reductions of $74,800 in professional
services costs.
o A 1.0 FTE planning grants engineer in the Public Works Department. Cost of this
position is budgeted at $100,010 allocated:
• 37.5% to the General Fund #001 at a cost of $37,467, which is offset by a
$40,000 reduction the professional services budget.
• 37.5% to the Street Fund #101 at a cost of $37,467, which is offset by a $40,000
reduction in the professional services budget.
• 25% to the Stormwater Management Fund #402 at a cost of$25,076.
Pertaining Specifically to the General Fund:
• The 2014 recurring revenue estimate of $36,823,500 is $1,548,800 or 4.39% greater than
the 2013 budget of$35,274,700.
• The 2014 recurring expenditure proposal of $36,823,010 is $1,510,336 or 4.28% greater
than the 2013 appropriation of$35,312,674.
• The increase of $1,510,336 is comprised of:
o $1,245,443 that is public safety related (reflecting a 5.63% increase over 2013), and
a $264,893 that is non-public safety related (reflecting a 2.01% increase over 2013)
• Recurring revenues currently exceed recurring expenditures by $490.
• Nonrecurring expenditures total $586,650 and include:
o a $192,500 transfer to Fund #309 — Park Capital Projects.
o $350,000 for a law enforcement contingency
o $8,800 for AutoCAD licenses for the Public Works Department
o $11,350 for replacement chairs at CenterPlace.
o $24,000 for a variety of improvements at the police precinct.
• The total of 2014 recurring and nonrecurring expenditures exceeds total revenues by
$586,160 - and this is entirely a result of the one-time/nonrecurring expenditures.
• The projected General Fund fund balance at the end of 2014 is currently $20,149,703 or
54.72% of recurring revenues.
2
11S11-FS21UserslmcalhounlBudgets120141RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint presentations12013 08 1312013 08 13
RCA Est 2014 rev and exp.docx
Other Funds:
2014 Budget appropriations (expenditures) in the other funds total $18,258,082 as follows:
Fund Fund 2014
Number Name Appropriation
101 Street Fund 4,688,216
103 Paths and Trails Fund 0
105 Hotel 1 Motel Tax Fund 577,000
120 CenterPlace Operating Reserve Fund 0
121 Service Leal Stabilization Reserve Fund 0
122 Winter Weather Reserve Fund 0
123 Civic Facilities Replacement Fund 616,284
204 Debt Service Fund 627,823
301 REET 1 Capital Projects Fund Capital Projects Fund 546,199
302 REET2 Capital Projects Fund gp 562,720
303 Street Capital Projects Fund 5,501,601
309 Parks Capital Projects Fund 262,500
310 Civic Facilities Capital Projects Fund 0
311 Pavement Preservation Fund 1,386,761
312 Capital Reserve Fund 250,000
402 Stormwater Management Fund 2,823,978
403 Aquifer Protection Area Fund 0
501 Equipment Rental and Replacement Fund 90,000
502 Risk Management Fund 325,000
18,258,082
Noteworthy here is that we are proposing to:
• Change the name of Fund #301 from Capital Projects Fund to REET 1 Capital Projects
Fund, and
• Change the name of Fund #302 from Special Capital Projects Fund to REET 2 Capital
Projects Fund
Primary sources of revenues in these other funds include:
• Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax revenue that is collected by the State and remitted to the Street
Fund is anticipated to be $1,858,600.
• Telephone Tax revenues remitted to the City that supports Street Fund operations and
maintenance are anticipated to be $2,750,000.
• Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) revenues that are in large part used to match grant financed
street projects are anticipated to total $1,200,000.
• Hotel / Motel Tax revenues that are dedicated to the promotion of visitors and tourism are
anticipated to be $490,000.
• Stormwater Management Fees that are estimated at $1,835,000.
• Aquifer Protection Area Fees are estimated at $500,000.
3
ISV-FS2lUserslmcalhounlBudgets120141RCAs and Intros and PowerPointpresenfations12013 08 1312013 08 13
RCA Est 2014 rev and exp.docx
OPTIONS: State law requires a public hearing on 2014 estimated revenues and expenditures.
A hearing is scheduled for August 27, 2013.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: No action is requested at this time.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Given that the budget will not be adopted by the Council until
October 22, 2013, it is possible the figures may be modified as we refine estimates of revenues
and expenditures.
STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun, Finance Director
ATTACHMENTS:
• Power Point presentation.
• Assorted 2014 Budget information:
o Pages 1-13 Budget summary information with detail by fund.
a Page 14 General Fund budget change from June 18 to August 13.
o Page 15 General Fund revenue and expenditure line-item changes.
o Page 16 Full-time equivalent employees (FTEs).
o Page 17 13-year history of CPI and Social Security increases.
a Page 18 CPI change by month —2011 through 2013
4
\\SV-FS2\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2014\budget summary as of 2013 0813
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 8/6/2013
2014 Budget
2013 2014 Difference Between
As Amended As Proposed 2013 and 2014
May 28 Amendment Amended Budget $ I %
#001 -GENERAL FUND
[RECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
Property Tax 10,943,700 0 10,943,700 11,049,400 105,700 0.97%
Sales Tax 15,250,000 0 15,250,000 16,390,000 1,140,000 7.48%
Sales Tax-Criminal Justice 1,280,000 0 1,280,000 1,330,000 50,000 3.91%
Safes Tax-Public Safety 750,000 0 750,000 745,000 (5,000) (0,67%)
Gambling Tax and Leasehold Excise Tax 612,500 0 612,500 619,400 6,900 1.13%
Franchise Fees/Business Registration 1,135,000 0 1,135,000 1,213,000 78,000 6.87%
State Shared Revenues 1,684,600 0 1,684,600 1,886,500 201,900 11.99%
Fines and Forfeitures/Public Safety 1,632,300 0 1,632,300 1,470,800 (161,500) (9.89%)
Community Development 1,174,000 0 1,174,000 1,255,400 81,400 6.93%
Recreation Program Revenues 571,500 0 571,500 579,800 8,300 1,45%
Miscellaneous Department Revenue 0 0 0 85,500 85,500 #DIV/0!
Miscellaneous&Investment Interest 158,000 0 158,000 115,600 (42,400) (26.84%)
Transfer-in -#101 (street admin) 39,700 0 39,700 39,700 0 0.00%
Transfer-in -#105(Wm tax-CP advertising) 30,000 0 30,000 30,000 0 0.00%
Transfer-in -#402(storm admin) 13,400 0 13,400 13,400 0 0,00%
Total Recurring Revenues 35,274,700 0 35,274,700 36,823,500 1,548,800 4.39%
Expenditures
City Council 390,111 0 390,111 414,950 24,839 6.37%
City Manager 637,984 0 637,984 660,843 22,859 3.58%
Legal 439,161 35,000 474,161 448,922 (25,239) (5.32%)
Public Safety 22,139,200 0 22,139,200 23,384,643 1,245,443 5.63%
Deputy City Manager 609,706 0 609,706 653,215 43,509 7.14%
Finance/IT 1,089,633 0 1,089,633 1,180,659 91,026 8.35%
Human Resources 232,469 0 232,469 237,883 5,414 2.33%
Public Works 876,443 0 876,443 882,694 6,251 0.71%
Community Development-Administration 257,175 12,750 269,925 290,883 20,958 7.76%
Community Development-Engineering 650,845 14,750 865,595 807,114 (58,481) (6.76%)
Community Development-Planning 899,743 12,750 912,493 928,906 16,413 1.80%
Community Development-Building 1,162,582 12,750 1,175,332 1,267,656 92,324 7.86%
Parks&Rec-Administration 270,717 0 270,717 274,743 4,026 1.49%
Parks&Rec-Maintenance 789,000 0 789,000 796,200 7,200 0.91%
Parks&Rec-Recreation 231,321 0 231,321 229,152 (2,169) (0.94%)
Parks&Rec-Aquatics 485,600 0 485,600 490,400 4,800 0.99%
Parks&Rec-Senior Center 88,143 0 88,143 89,882 1,739 1.97%
Parks&Rec-CenterPlace 800,884 0 800,884 828,842 27,958 3.49%
Pavement Preservation 655,857 0 855,857 888,823 32,966 3.85%
General Government 1,799,100 0 1,799,100 1,741,600 (57,500) (3.20%)
Transfers out-#502(insurance premium) 319,000 0 319,000 325,000 6,000 1.88%
Total Recurring Expenditures 35,224,674 88,000 35,312,674 36,823,010 1,510,336 4.28%
Recurring Revenues Over(Under)
Recurring Expenditures 50,026 (88,000) (37,974) 490
Page 1 of 18
\\SV-F52\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\20141budget summary as of 2013 0813
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA L 8/6/2013
2014 Budget
2013 2014 Difference Between
As Amended As Proposed 2013 and 2014
May 28 Amendment Amended Budget 1 $
#001 -GENERAL FUND-continued
NONRECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
Transfer in-#120(excess reserves) 50,787 0 50,787 0 (50,787) (100.00%)
Total Nonrecurring Revenues 50,787 0 50,787 0 (50,787) (100.00%)
Expenditures
Transfers out-#309(park grant match) 50,000 0 50,000 192,500 142,500 285.00%
Law Enforcement Contingency 0 0 0 350,000 350,000 #DIV10!
Public Works(solaced licenses) 0 0 0 8,800 8,800 #DIV/0!
Parks&Recreation (CPchairs) 0 0 0 11,350 11,350 #D1V10!
Public Safety(precinct improvements) 0 0 24,000 24,000 #DIV/01
Transfers out-#312(Capital Reserve Fund) 7,828,207 0 7,826,207 0 (7,826,207) (100.00%)
Parks&Recreation related 56,962 0 56,962 0 (56,962) (100.00%)
Carpet at City Hall 25,000 0 25,000 0 (25,000) (100.00%)
Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 7,958,169 0 7,958,169 586,650 (7,371,519) (92.63%)
Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under)
Nonrecurring Expenditures (7,907,382) 0 (7,907,382) (586,650)
Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues
Over(Under)Total Expenditures (7,857,356) (88,000) (7,945,356) (586,160)
Beginning unrestricted fund balance 28,681,219 28,681,219 20,735,863
Ending unrestricted fund balance 20,823,863 20,735,863 20,149,703
Fund balance as a percent of recurring expenditures I 59.12%1 58.72% 54.72%
Page 2 of 18
\`SV-FS2\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2014\budget summary as of 2013 0813
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 8/6/2013
2014 Budget
2013 2014 Difference Between
As Amended As Proposed 2013 and 2014
May 28 Amendment Amended Budget $
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
#101 -STREET FUND
RECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
Motor Vehicle Fuel(Gas)Tax 1,861,100 0 1,861,100 1,858,600 (2,500) (0.13%)
Investment Interest 5,000 0 5,000 3,000 (2,000) (40,00%)
Utility Tax 2,900,000 0 2,900,000 2,750,000 (150,000) (5.17%)
Total Recurring Revenues 4,766,100 0 4,766,100 4,611,600 (154,500) (3.24%)
Expenditures
Wages/Benefits 1 Payroll Taxes 573,170 0 573,170 627,288 54,118 9.44%
Supplies 72,200 0 72,200 91,500 19,300 26.73%
Services&Charges 2,456,152 0 2,456,152 2,167,201 (288,951) (11.76%)
Snow Operations 469,000 0 469,000 520,000 51,000 10.87%
Intergovernmental Payments 851,000 0 851,000 798,000 (53,000) (6.23%)
Transfers-out-#001 39,700 0 39,700 39,700 0 0,00%
Transfers-out-#311 (pavement preservation) 282,000 0 282,000 282,000 0 0.00%
Transfers-out-#501 (plow replace.) 150,000 0 150,000 75,000 (75,000) (50.00%)
Transfers-out-#501 (non-plow vehicle rental) 10,777 0 10,777 10,777 0 0.00%
Total Recurring Expenditures 4,903,999 0 4,903,999 4,611,466 (292,533) (5.97%)
Recurring Revenues Over(Under)
Recurring Expenditures (137,899) 0 (137,899) 134
NONRECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
Grants 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Total Nonrecurring Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Expenditures
Patch trailer 0 0 0 30,000 30,000 #DIV/0!
Pickup 0 0 0 15,000 15,000 #DIV/0!
Hawk Signal 0 0 0 25,000 25,000 #DIVIO!
Software 0 0 0 6,750 6,750 #DIV/0!
Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 0 0 0 76,750 76,750 #DIV/0!
Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under)
Nonrecurring Expenditures 0 0 0 (76,750)
Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues
Over(Under)Total Expenditures (137,899) 0 (137,899) (76,616)
Beginning fund balance 2,228,437 2,228,437 2,090,538
Ending fund balance 2,090,538 2,090,538 2,013,922
Page 3 of 18
\\SV-FS2\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2014\budget summary as of 2013 08 13
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA I 8/6/2013 I
2014 Budget
2013 2014 Difference Between
As Amended' As Proposed 2013 and 2014
May 28 Amendment Amended Budget $ I %
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS-continued
#103-PATHS&TRAILS
Revenues
Motor Vehicle Fuel(Gas)Tax 7,800 0 7,800 7,800 0 0.00%
Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/01
Total revenues 7,800 0 7,800 7,800 0 0.00%
Expenditures
Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 #DIVI01
Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 #DIVIO!
Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Revenues over(under)expenditures 7,800 7,800 7,800
Beginning fund balance 63,941 _ 63,941 71,741
Ending fund balance 71,741 71,741 79,541
#105-HOTEL I MOTEL TAX FUND
Revenues
HotellMotel Tax 460,000 30,000 490,000 490,000 0 0.00%
Investment Interest 500 0 500 300 (200) (40.00%)
Total revenues 460,500 30,000 490,500 490,300 (200) (0.04%)
Expenditures
Transfers out-#001 30,000 0 30,000 0 (30,000) (100.00%)
City directed marketing efforts 55,000 0 55,000 0 (55,000) (100.00%)
Tourism Promotion-contracted 425,500 0 425,500 0 (425,500) (100.00%)
Tourism Promotion 0 0 0 577,000 577,000 #DIV/01
Total expenditures 510,500 0 510,500 577,000 66,500 13.03%
Revenues over(under)expenditures (50,000) (20,000) (86,700)
Beginning fund balance 206,772 206,772 186,772
Ending fund balance 156,772 186,772 100,072
Page 4 of 18
\15V-FS2\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2014\budget summary as of 2013 0813
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA r 8/6/2013
2014 Budget
2013 2014 Difference Between
As Amended As Proposed 2013 and 2014
May 28 Amendment Amended Budget $ [ %
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS-continued
#120-CENTER PLACE OPERATING RESERVE FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Transfers-in 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Total revenues 0 0 0 0 0 #DIVIO!
Expenditures
Operations 50,787 0 50,787 0 (50,787) (100.00%)
Total expenditures 50,787 0 50,787 0 (50,787) (100.00%)
Revenues over(under)expenditures (50,787) (50,787) 0
Beginning fund balance 350,787 350,787_ 300,000
Ending fund balance 300,000 300,000 300,000
#121 -SERVICE LEVEL STABILIZATION RESERVE FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest 7,000 0 7,000 7,300 300 4.29%
Transfers-in 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Total revenues 7,000 0 7,000 7,300 300 4.29%
Expenditures
Operations 0 0 0 0 0 #DIVIO!
Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Revenues over(under)expenditures 7,000 7,000 7,300
Beginning fund balance 5,441,531 5,441,531 5,448,531
Ending fund balance 5,448,531_ 5,448,531 5,455,831
#122-WINTER WEATHER RESERVE FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest 700 0 700 700 0 0.00%
Transfers-in 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV101
Subtotal revenues 700 0 700 700 0 0.00%
Expenditures
Reserve for Winter Weather 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/01
Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV10!
Revenues over(under)expenditures 700 700 700
Beginning fund balance 502,888 502,888 503,588
Ending fund balance 503,588 503,588 504,288
#123-CIVIC FACILITIES REPLACEMENT FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest 1,600 0 1,600 1,700 100 6.25%
Transfers-in-#001 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV10l
Total revenues 1,600 0 1,600 1,700 100 6.25%
Expenditures
Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0l
Transfers out-#311 (pavement preservation) 616,284 0 616,284 616,284 0 0.00%
Total expenditures 616,284 0 616,284 616,284 0 0.00%
Revenues over(under)expenditures (614,684) (614,684) (614,584)
Beginning fund balance 2,403,947 2,403,947 1,789,263
Ending fund balance 1,789,263 1,789,263 1,174,679
Page 5 of 18
`\SV-F52\Users\mcalhoun`Budgets\2014\budget summary as of 2013 08 13
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 8/6/2013
2014 Budget
2013 2014 1 Difference Between
As Amended As Proposed 2013 and 2014
May 28 Amendment Amended Budget $ I %
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
#204-DEBT SERVICE FUND
Revenues
Spokane Public Facilities District 437,120 0 437,120 441,520 4,400 1,01%
Transfer-in-#301 92,951 0 92,951 93,152 201 0.22%
Transfer-in-#302 92,952 0 92,952 93,151 199 0.21%
Total revenues 623,023 0 623,023 627,823 4,800 0.77%
Expenditures
Debt Service Payments-CenterPlace 437,120 0 437,120 441,520 4,400 1.01%
Debt Service Payments-Roads 185,903 0 185,903 186,303 400 0.22%
Total expenditures 623,023 0 623,023 627,823 4,800 0.77%
Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 0
Beginning fund balance 0 0 0
Ending fund balance 0 0 0
Page 6 of 18
\\SV-FS2\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2014\budget summary as of 2013 08 13
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 1 8/6/2013
2014 Budget
2013 2014 Difference Between
As Amended As Proposed 2013 and 2014
May 28 _Amendment Amended Budget $ I %
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS
#301 -REET 1 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
REET 1 -Taxes 500,000 0 500,000 600,000 100,000 20.00%
Investment Interest 500 0 500 1,000 500 100.00%
Total revenues 500,500 0 500,500 601,000 100,500 20.08%
Expenditures
Transfer-out-#204 92,951 0 92,951 93,152 201 0.22%
Transfer-out-#303 892,404 0 892,404 268,575 (623,829) (69.90%)
Transfers out-#311 (pavement preservation) 150,000 0 150,000 184,472 34,472 22.98%
Total expenditures 1,135,355 0 1,135,355 546,199 (589,156) (51.89%)
Revenues over(under)expenditures (634,855) (634,855) 54,801
Beginning fund balance 1,092,264 1,092,264 457,409
Ending fund balance 457,409 457,409 512,210
#302-REET 2 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
REET 2-Taxes 500,000 0 540,000 600,000 100,000 20.00%
Investment Interest 1,000 0 1,000 1,000 0 0.00%
Total revenues 501,000 0 501,000 601,000 100,000 19.96%
Expenditures
Transfer-out-#204 92,952 0 92,952 93,151 199 0.21%
Transfer-out-#303 617,479 0 617,479 285,097 (332,382) (53.83%)
Transfers out-#311 (pavement preservation) 150,000 0 150,000 184,472 34,472 22.98%
Total expenditures 860,431 0 860,431 562,720 (297,711) (34.60%)
Revenues over(under)expenditures (359,431) (359,431) 38,280
Beginning fund balance 1,130,670 1,130,670 771,239
Ending fund balance 771,239 771,239 809,519
Page 7 of 18
\\SV-F521,Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2014\budget summary as of 2013 0813
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 8/6/2013
2014 Budget
2013 2014 Difference Between
As Amended As Proposed 2013 and 2014
May 28 Amendment Amended Budget $ I %
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued
#303-STREET CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
Grant Proceeds 6,597,842 0 6,597,842 4,524,808 (2,073,034) (31.42%)
Developer 0 0 0 166,020 166,020 4DIV101
Transfer-In-#301 892,404 0 892,404 268,575 (623,829) (69.90%)
Transfer-in-#302 617,479 0 617,479 285,097 (332,382) (53.83%)
Transfer-in-#312 0 0 0 250,000 250,000 #DIV10!
Transfer in-#402 0 0 0 7,101 7,101 #DIV/0!
Total revenues 8,107,725 0 8,107,725 5,501,601 (2,606,124) (32.14%)
Expenditures
005 Pines/Mansfield,Wilbur Rd.to Pines 300,000 0 300,000 0 (300,000) (100.00%)
060 Argonne Rd Corridor Upgrade SRTC 957,892 0 957,892 860,280 (97,612) (10,19%)
061 Pines(5R27)ITS Improvements 637,288 0 637,288 10,000 (627,288) (98.43%)
115 Sprague Ave Resurfacing-Evergreen to Sullivan 188,745 0 188,745 0 (188,745) (100.00%)
123 Mission Ave.-Flora to Barker 0 127,500 127,500 382,410 254,910 199.93%
141 Sullivan&Euclid PCC(PE&RW) 139,332 0 139,332 123,090 (16,242) (11.66%)
142 Broadway @ Argonne/Muilan PCC Int,(PE/RW) 219,599 0 219,599 50,000 (169,599) (77.23%)
145 Spokane Valley-Millwood Trail 200,000 0 200,000 100,000 (100,000) (50.00%)
146 24th Ave Sidewalk-Adams to Sullivan 15,000 0 15,000 0 (15,000) (100.00%)
149 Sidewalk Infill 337,507 0 337,507 364,425 26,918 7.98%
154 Sidewalk&Tansit Stop Accessibility 33,198 0 33,198 0 (33,198) (100.00%)
155 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement 800,000 0 800,000 0 (800,000) (100.00%)
156 Mansfield Ave.Connection 1,012,924 0 1,012,924 1,158,727 145,803 14.39%
159 University Rd 11-90 Overpass Study 125,000 0 125,000 50,000 (75,000) (60.00%)
166 Pines Rd(SR27)&Grace Ave. Intersect Safety 98,100 0 98,100 538,850 440,750 449.29%
167 Citywide Safety Improvements(bike/ped) 450,995 0 450,995 341,928 (109,067) (24.18%)
168 Wellesley Ave&Adams Rd Sidewalk 554,500 0 554,500 30,000 (524,500) (94.59%)
169 Argonne/Mullen Corridor Safety-Indiana to Broads 104,460 0 104,460 0 (104,460) (100.00%)
170 Argonne Road-Empire to Knox Corridor Safety 172,785 0 172,785 0 (172,785) (100.00%)
171 Sprague Ave ADA Sdwlk Improve(Havana-Fanct 110,400 0 110,400 0 (110,400) (100.00%)
176 Appleway Trail Design 150,000 0 150,000 0 (150,000) (100.00%)
177 Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 0.00%
181 Citywide Traffic Sign Upgrade 0 150,000 150,000 50,000 (100,000) (66.67%)
185 Appleway Landscaping-Phase 1 0 18,000 18,000 250,000 232,000 1288,89%
XXX ITS Infill Project Phase 1 (PE START 2014) 0 0 0 91,891 91,891 #DIV10!
Contingency 1,500,000 (395,500) 1,104,500 1,000,000 (104,500) (9.46%)
Total expenditures 8,107,725 0 8,107,725 5,501,601 (2,606,124) (32.14%)
Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 0
Beginning fund balance 73,646 73,646 73,646
Ending fund balance 73,646 73,646 73,646
Page 8 of 18
WV-F52\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2014\budget summary as of 2013 08 13
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 8/6/2013
2014 Budget
2013 2014 Difference Between
As Amended As Proposed 2013 and 2014
May 28 Amendment Amended Budget , $
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued
#309-PARKS CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
Transfer-in-#001 50,000 0 50,000 192,500 142,500 285.00%
Investment Interest 0 0 0 500 500 #DIV/0!
Total revenues 50,000 0 50,000 193,000 143,000 286.00%
Expenditures
Capital 50,000 0 50,000 0 (50,000) (100.00%)
Sand volleyball courts(4)at Brown's Park 0 0 0 40,000 40,000 #DIV/0!
Edgecliff picnic shelter 0 0 0 65,000 65,000 #DIVIO!
Discovery Playground equipment 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 #DIV10!
Shade structure at Discovery Playground 0 0 0 15,000 15,000 #DIVIO!
City entry sign 0 0 0 70,000 70,000 #DIV/0!
Park signs(3) 0 0 0 22,500 22,500 #DIVIO!
Total expenditures 50,000 0 50,000 262,500 212,500 425,00%
Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 (69,500)
Beginning fund balance 302,423 302,423 302,423
Ending fund balance 302,423 302,423 232,923
#310-CIVIC FACILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV10!
Investment Interest 0 0 0 1,900 1,900 #DIVIO!
Total revenues 0 0 0 1,900 1,900 #DIV/0!
Expenditures
Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 #DIVIO!
Capital 0 0 0 0 0 #DIVIO!
Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 1,900
Beginning fund balance 1,110,074 1,110,074 1,110,074
Ending fund balance 1,110,074 1,110,074 1,111,974
#311 -PAVEMENT PRESERVATION
Revenues
Transfers in-#101 282,000 0 282,000 282,000 0 0.00%
Transfers in-#123 616,284 0 616,284 616,284 0 0.00%
Transfers in-#301 150,000 0 150,000 184,472 34,472 22.98%
Transfers in-#302 150,000 0 150,000 184,472 34,472 22.98%
Federal STP(U)Grant 0 1,359,780 1,359,780 1,199,548 (160,232) (11.78%)
Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0?
Total revenues 1,198,284 1,359,780 2,558,064 2,466,776 (91,288) (3.57%)
Expenditures
Pavement preservation 1,198,284 1,837,859 3,036,143 1,386,761 (1,649,382) (54.32%)
Total expenditures 1,198,284 1,837,859 3,036,143 1,386,761 (1,649,382) (54.32%)
Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 (478,079) 1,080,015
Beginning fund balance 948,733 948,733 470,654
Ending fund balance 948,733 470,654 _ 1,550,669
Page 9 of 18
\\SV-FS2\Users\mca!houn\Budgets\2014\budget summary as of 2013 08 13
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 8/6/2013
2014 Budget
2013 2014 Difference Between
As Amended As Proposed 2013 and 2014
May 28 Amendment Amended Budget _ $ I %
[CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued
#312-CAPITAL RESERVE FUND
Revenues
Transfers in-#001 7,826,207 0 7,826,207 0 (7,826,207) (100.00%)
Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0 #DIVIO!
Total revenues 7,826,207 0 7,826,207 0 (7,826,207) (100.00%)
Expenditures
Capital Outlays 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Business Route Signage 60,000 0 60,000 0 (60,000) (100.00%)
Balfour Park 1 Library site development 42,150 0 42,150 0 (42,150) (100.00%)
Transfer-out#303-Phase 1 -Appleway Landsca. 0 0 0 250,000 250,000 #DIV/0!
Transfer-out#303-SB Sullivan St Bridge 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Total expenditures 102,150 0 102,150 250,000 147,850 144.74%
Revenues over(under)expenditures 7,724,057 7,724,057 (250,000)
Beginning fund balance 0 0 7,724,057
Ending fund balance 7,724,057 7,724,057 7,474,057
Page 10 of 18
115V-F52\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets120141budget summary as of 2013 0813
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 8/612013
2014 Budget
2013 2014 Difference Between '
As Amended 1 As Proposed 2013 and 2014
May 28 Amendment Amended Budget $ I %
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
#402-STORMWATER FUND
RECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
Stormwater Management Fees 1,800,000 0 1,800,000 1,835,000 35,000 1.94%
Investment Interest 1,800 0 1,800 2,500 700 38.89%
Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 #01VI0!
Total Recurring Revenues 1,801,800 0 1,801,800 1,837,500 35,700 1.98%
Expenditures
Wages/Benefits/Payroll Taxes 475,604 0 475,604 505,535 29,931 6.29%
Supplies 16,300 0 16,300 15,900 (400) (2.45%)
Services&Charges 1,127,120 0 1,127,120 1,065,076 (62,044) (5.50%)
Intergovernmental Payments 27,000 0 27,000 26,500 (500) (1.85%)
Transfers-out-#001 13,400 0 13,400 13,400 0 0.00%
Transfers-out-#501 1,567 0 1,567 1,567 0 0.00%
Total Recurring Expenditures 1,660,991 0 1,660,991 1,627,978 (33,013) (1.99%)
Recurring Revenues Over(Under)
Recurring Expenditures 140,809 0 140,809 209,522
NONRECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
Grant Proceeds 200,000 0 200,000 0 (200,000) (100.00%)
Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Total Nonrecurring Revenues 200,000 0 200,000 0 (200,000) (100.00%)
Expenditures
Capital-various projects 350,000 0 350,000 900,000 550,000 157.14%
Property acquisition 0 0 0 250,000 250,000 #DIV/01
Pickup 0 0 0 30,000 30,000 #01VI0!
VMS Trailer 0 0 0 16,000 16,000 #DIV/0!
Sullivan Bridge Drain Retrofit 267,000 0 267,000 0 (267,000) (100.00%)
UIC Retrofits on Pvmnt Pres Projects 430,000 0 430,000 0 (430,000) (100.00%)
Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 1,047,000 0 1,047,000 1,196,000 149,000 14.23%
Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under)
Nonrecurring Expenditures (847,000) 0 (647,000) (1,196,000)
Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues
Over(Under)Total Expenditures (706,191) 0 (706,191) (986,478)
Beginning working capital 2,697,333 2,697,333 1,991,142
Ending working capital 1,991,142 1,991,142 1,004,664
Page 11 of 18
\\SV-F52\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2014\budget summary as of 2013 08 13
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA ! 8/6/2013
2014 Budget
2013 2014 Difference Between
As Amended As Proposed 2013 and 2014
May 28 Amendment Amended Budget $ I %n
ENTERPRISE FUNDS-continued
#403-AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA
Revenues
Spokane County 500,000 0 500,000 500,000 0 0.00%
Grant DOE-Decant Facility 735,000 0 735,000 0 (735,000) (100.00%)
Grant DOT-Decant Facility 150,000 0 150,000 0 (150,000) (100.00%)
Grant DOE-Sprague UIC Elimination 610,331 0 610,331 0 (610,331) (100.00%)
Grant revenue 0 0 0 0 0 4DIV/01
Investment Interest 1,000 0 1,000 0 (1,000) (100.00%)
Total revenues 1,996,331 0 1,996,331 500,000 (11,496,331) (74.95%)
Expenditures
Sprague Swales 40,000 0 40,000 0 (40,000) (100.00%)
14th Ave Custer to Carnahan 300,000 0 300,000 0 (300,000) (100.00%)
Bettman-Dickey Storm drain 250,000 0 250,000 0 (250,000) (100.00%)
Decant Facility 980,000 0 980,000 0 (980,000) (100.00%)
Capital projects 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV10!
Total expenditures 1,570,000 0 1,570,000 0 (1,570,000) (100.00%)
Revenues over(under)expenditures 426,331 426,331 500,000
Beginning working capital (108,658) (108,658) 317,673
Ending working capital 317,673 317,673 817,673
Page 12 of 18
\\SV-FS2\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2014\budget summary as of 2013 0813
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 8/6/2013
2014 Budget
2013 2014 _ Difference Between
As Amended As Proposed 2013 and 2014
May 28 Amendment Amended Budget $
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
#501 -ER&R FUND
Revenues
Transfer-in-#001 15,400 0 15,400 15,400 0 0.00%
Transfer-in-#101 10,777 0 10,777 10.777 0 0.00%
Transfer-in-#101 (plow replace.) 150,000 0 150,000 75,000 (75,000) (50.00%)
Transfer-in-#402 1,567 0 1,567 1,567 0 0.00%
Investment Interest 1,000 0 1,000 1,000 0 0.00%
Transfer-in-#101 0 0 0 15,000 15,000 #DIV/0!
Transfer-In-#402 0 0 0 30,000 30,000 #DIV/0!
Total revenues 178,744 0 178,744 148,744 (30,000) (16.78%)
Expenditures
Computer replacement lease 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Software/Hardware replacement 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV10!
Vehicle Replacement 50,000 0 50,000 90,000 40,000 80.00%
Snow Plow Replacement 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Total expenditures 50,000 0 50,000 90,000 40,000 80.00%
Revenues over(under)expenditures 128,744 128,744 58,744
Beginning working capital 1,053,177 1,053,177 1,181,921
Ending working capital 1,181,921 1,181,921 1,240,665
#502-RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Transfer-in-#001 319,000 0 319,000 325,000 6,000 1.88%
Total revenues 319,000 0 319,000 325,000 6,000 1.88%
Expenditures
Auto&Property Insurance 319,000 0 319,000 325,000 6,000 1.88%
Unemployment Claims 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/O!
Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Total expenditures 319,000 0 319,000 325,000 6,000 1.88%
Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 0
Beginning fund balance 83,212 83,212 83,212
Ending fund balance 83,212 83,212 83,212
TOTAL OF ALL FUNDS
Total of Revenues for all Funds 63,871,801 1,389,780 65,261,581 54,747,244
Total of Expenditures for all Funds 65,988,372 1,925,859 67,914,231 55,667,742
Total Capital expenditures(included in
total expenditures) 12,981,016 1,837.859 14,818,875 9,402,435
Page 13 of 18
NONRECURRING ACTIVITY I
5912%1
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA
2014 Budget
General Fund
I RECURRING ACTIVITY I
Revenues
Property Tax
Sales Tax
Sales Tax-Criminal Justice
Sales Tax-Public Safety
Gambling Tax and Leasehold Excise Tax
Franchise Foes/Businoss Registration
State Shared Revenues
Fines and Forfoitures/Public Safety
Community Development
Recreation Program Revenues
Miscellaneous Department Revenue
Miscellaneous&Investment Interest
Transfer-in-#101(street admin)
Transfer-in-/1105(him tax-CF adverrisrng)
Transfer-in-#402(storm admfn)
Total Recurring Revenues 35 274,700
onditums
City Council 390,111
City Manager 637,984
Legal 439,181 35,00
Public Safety 22,139,200
Deputy City Manager 809,708
Finance!IT 1,089,633
Human Resources 232,489
Public Works 876„443
Community Development-Administration 257,175 12,75
Community Development-Engineering 850,845 14,75
Community Development-Planning 899,743 12,75
Community Development-Building 1,182,582 12,75
Parks&Roc-Administration 270,717
Parks&Roc-Maintenance 789,000
Parks&Roc-Recreation 231,321
Parks&Rec-Aquatics 485,800
Parks&Roc-Senior Cantor 58,143
Parks&Roc-ConterPlace 800,884
Pavement Preservation 855,857
General Government 1,799,100
Transfers out.#502(insurance premium! 319.900
2013
As Amended
May 28
Amendment
As
Amended
10,943,700
15,250.000
1,280,000
750,000
612,500
1,135,000
1,684,600
1,632,300
1,174,000
571,500
0
158,000
39,700
30,000
13490
\\SV-F52\Users\rncalhoun\Budgets\2014\budget summary as of 2013 08 13
2014
as of
6118/2013
Change
as
Revised
10,943,700 11,049,400
15,250,000 16,260,000
1,280,000 1,320,000
750.000 740,000
812,500 819,400
1,135,000 1,213,000
16,84,600 2,066,700
1,632,300 1,470,800
1,174,000 1,255,400
571,500 579,800
0 85.500
158,000 115,600
39,700 39,700
30,000 C
13,400
0
130,000
10,000
5.000
0
0
(180,200)
30,000
13,400 0
I 8/5/2013 I
Difference Between
2013 and 2014
5 I %
11,049,400 105,700 0.97%
18,390,000 1,140,000 7.48%
1,330,000 50,000 3.91%
745,000 (5,000) (0.67%)
819,400 6,902 1.13%
1,213,000 78,000 6.87%
1,886,500 201,900 11.99%
1,470,800 (181500) (9.89%)
1,255,400 81.400 8.93%
579,800 8,300 1.45%
65.500 85.500 #DIV(01
115,600 (42,400) (28.84%)
39,700 0 0.00%
30,000 0 0.00%
13,400 0 0.00%
35,274,700 36,828,700 (5,200) 36,823,500 1,548,800 4.39%
390,111 413,850
637,984 660,843
474,161 444,922
22,139,200 23,384,643
609,706 826,215
1,089,633 1,120,464
232,469 237,433
678,443 885228
269,925 290,883
865,595 807,114
912,493 929,906
1,175,332 1,267,656
270,717 274,743
789,000 798,200
231,321 229,152
485,600 490,400
88,143 89,882
800,884 798,842 30,00
855,857 888,823
1,799,100 1,811,600 {70,00
319.000 325.000
1,100
0
4,000
0
27,000
80,195
450
12,534)
414,950 24,839 6.37%
660,843 22,859 3.58%
448,922 (25,239) (5.32%)
23,384,643 1,245,443 5.63%
653,215 43,509 7.14%
1,180 859 91,026 8.35%
237,883 5,414 2.33%
862,694 6,251 0.71%
293,883 20,958 7,76%
807,114 (58,481) (6.78%)
928,906 18,413 1.80%
1,267,656 92,324 7.86%
274,743 4,026 1.49%
796,200 7,200 0.91%
229,152 (2,169) {0.94%)
496400 4,890 0.99%
89,882 1,739 1.97%
825,842 27,958 349%
889.823 32,986 3.85%
1,741,600 (57,500) {5.20%)
325.000 6,000 1.88%
Total Recurring Expenditures 35,224,674 88,000 35,312,674 36,772 799 50,211 38 823,010 1,510,336 4.28%
Recurring Revenues Over(Under)
Recurring Expenditures 50,026 (88,000) (37,974) 55901 (55,411) 490
Revenues
Tmnsfar in-#120(excess reserves) 50,787 0 50,787 0
Total Nonrecurring Revenues 50,787 0 56787 0
0
O (50,787) (100.00%)
0
O (50,767) (100.00%)
Expenditures
Transfers out-#309(park grant match) 50,000 0 50,01)0 190,010 92,500 192,500 142,500 285.00%
Law Enforcement Contingency 0 0 0 350,000 0 350,000 350,000 #DIV/01
Public Works(aufocad licenses) 0 0 0 0 8,800 8,800 8,800 #DIV/01
Parks 8 Recreation(CPchairs) 0 0 ❑ 0 11,350 11,350 11,350 #DIV/01
Public Safety(precinct improvements) 0 0 0 0 24,000 24,000 24,000 #DIV/01
Transfers out-#312(Capital Reserve Fund) 7,826,207 0 7826,207 0 0 0 {7,826,207) (100.00%)
Parks&Recreation related 56,962 0 56,962 0 0 0 (56,982) (100.00%)
Carpet at City Hall 25,000 0 25,000 0 0 0 (25,000) (100.00%)
Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 7,958,169 0 7958,169 _ 450,000 136,650 586,650 {7,371,519) (92.63%)
Nonrecuning Revenues Over(Under)
Nonrecurring Expenditures
Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues
Over(Under)Total Expenditures (7,857,358) - (88,000) (7,945,356) (394,099) (192,061) (586,180)
Beginning unrestricted fund balance 28,681,219 28,681,219 20,735,863 20,735,863
Ending unrestricted Fund balance 20,823 883 70735,883 20,341 764 70,149,703
(7,907,382) 0 (1,907,382) _(450:000} {136 656) ( , )
586650
Fund balance as a percent at recurring oxpend/funs
I 58.72%1
f 5532661
Minimum fund balance of 50% 18,386,400
Fund balance greater than 50% 1,955,364
54.72%I
Page 14 of 18
18,411,505
1,738,198
\\SV-FS2\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2014\budget summary as of 2013 08 13
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 8/6/2013
General Fund #001
2014 Budget Worksheets - Expenditure Changes from June 18 to August 13,2013
Line-Item Line-Item
Account Budget @ Increase Budget @
Number Description 6/18/2013 (Decrease) 8/13/2013
[Revenues
001.000.313.10.00 Sales Tax 16,260,000 130,000 16,390,000
001.000.313.71.00 Sales Tax- Criminal Justice 1,320,000 10,000 1,330,000
001.000.313.73.00 Sales Tax- Public Safety 740,000 5,000 745,000
001.000.336.06.21 MVET Criminal Justice- Population 20,500 3,300 23,800
001.000.336.06.26 Criminal Justice Special Programs 77,100 2,500 79,600
001.000.336.06.94 Liquor Board Excise Tax 294,200 (185,300) 108,900
001.000.336.06.95 Liquor Board Profits 814,000 (700) 813,300
001.076.397.76.01 Transfer In-#105 (him tax-CP advertising) 0 30,000 30,000
(5,200)
[Expenditures
City Council
001.011.000.511.60.42.01 Postage R 1,100 1,100 2,200
Leqal
001.013.015.515.32.41.03 Spokane County GIS R 0 2,500 2,500
001.013.015.515.32.49.05 Filing & Recording Fees R 3,000 1,500 4,500
4,000
Public Safety
001.016.099.521.20.35.01 Small Tools& Minor Equip N 0 12,000 12,000
001.016.099.521.20.48.00 Maintenance N 0 12,000 12,000
24,000
Deputy City Manager
001.018.013.513.10.41.17 Advertising R 0 27,000 27,000
Finance
001.018.014.514.21xx.xx Payroll (Help Desk Tech) R 1,086,064 64,995 1,151,059
001.018.014.514.23.41.05 Professional Services R 4,800 (4,800) 0
60,195
Human Resources
001.018.016.516.20.49.13 Employee Health &Wellness R 870 450 1,320
Public Works
001.032.000.543.10.xx.xx Payroll (Planning Grants Engineer) R 761,903 37,466 799,369
001.032.000.543.10.41.02 Engineering &Architectural R 48,000 (40,000) 8,000
001.032.099.543.10.31.01 Nonrecurring Supplies (AutoCAD) N 0 8,800 8,800
6,266
Parks & Rec-CenterPlace
001.076.099.576.10.31.01 Nonrecurring Supplies (CP chairs) N 0 11,350 11,350
001.076.305.575.50.41.17 Advertising (CenterPlace) R 33,000 30,000 63,000
41,350
General Government
001.090.000.518.85.41.03 IT Support(Help Desk Tech) R 98,500 (70,000) 28,500
001.090.000.597.30.00.90 Park Capital transfer to#309 N 100,000 92,500 192,500
22,500
Total changes in General Fund expenditures 186,861
R= recurring 50,211
N = nonrecurring 136,650
186,861
Page 15 of 18
\\SV-FS2\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2014\budget summary as of 2013 08 13
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA
Full Time Equivalent Employees
Difference from
Adopted Proposed 2013 to 2014
2009 I. 2010 I 2011 I 2012 I 2013 2014 + (-)
#001 -General Fund
City Manager 1 City Clerk 5 5 5 5 5 5
Legal 3 3 3 3 3 3
Deputy City Manager 8 8 7 7 6 6
Finance 10 12 11 11 10.75 11.75 1.000 (1)
Human Resources 2 2 2 2 2 2
Public Works 7.5 7.5 7.5 7 7 7.375 0.375 (2)
CD-Administration 3 3 3 3 2 2
CD-Engineering 8 8 6 6 8 7 (1.000) (3)
CD- Planning 9 9 8.5 8.5 8 8
CD-Building 14.75 14.75 12.75 12.75 11.5 12.5 1.000 (3)
Parks&Rec-Admin 2 2 2 2 2 2
Parks&Rec-Recreation 1 1 1 1 1 1
Parks&Rec-Senior Cntr 1 1 1 1 1 1
Parks& Rec-CenterPlace 7 7 5 5 5 5
Total General Fund 81,25 83.25 74.75 74.25 72.25 73.625 1.375
#101 -Street Fund 5 5 4.5 5 5 5.375 0.375 (2)
#303-Street Capital Project Fund 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
#402-Storm Water Fund 4 4 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.75 0.250 (2)
Total FTEs 93.75 95.75 87.25 87.25 85.25 87.250 2.000
(1) Reflects the addition of a 1.0 FTE Help Desk Technician.
(2) Reflects the addition of a 1.0 FTE Planning Grants Engineer.
(3) Reflects the transfer of an employee from one division to another.
Page 16 of 18
\\SV-FS2\Users\mcalhou n\Budgets\2014\budget summary as of 2013 08 13
History of CPI as Published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics 7/18/2013
and Social Security COLAs for the years 2001 through 2014
July to July-U.S.City Average
Year I CPI-U I CPI-W Social Security CPI Increase:
For calendar year 2014
2013 For calendar year 2013 1.7
2012 1.4 1.3 For calendar year 2012 3.6
2011 3.6 4,1 For calendar year 2011 0.0
2010 1.2 1.6 For calendar year 2010 0.0
2009 -2.1 -2.7 For calendar year 2009 5.8
2008 5.6 6.2 For calendar year 2008 2.3
2007 2.4 2,3 For calendar year 2007 3.3
2006 4.1 4.3 For calendar year 2006 4.1
2005 3.2 3.3 For calendar year 2005 2.7
2004 3.0 3.0 For calendar year 2004 2.1
2003 2.1 2.0 For calendar year 2003 1.4
2002 1.5 1.3 For calendar year 2002 2.6
2001 2.7 2.6 For calendar year 2001 3.5
average 2.3917 2.4417 average 2.5462
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics
CPI-U=All Urban Consumers
The CPI-U measures consumer inflation for all U.S.residents of urban areas,which accounts
for about 87%of the U.S.population.
CPl-W=Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers
The CPI-W measures consumer price inflation for a subset of the CPI-U population: residents
of ubran areas who live in households that:
receive more than half of their income from clerical or wage occupations,and
have one earner employed for at least 37 weeks during the previous 12 months.
The CPI-W covers about 32 percent of the U.S.population.
The CPI-U is the most commonly used index because it has the broadest population
coverage. However,the CPI-W is used sometimes to make cost-of-living adjustments for
labor contracts.
**Social security increase for 2013 is based upon the change in the CPI-W,comparing
September 2012 to September 2011.
Page 17 of 18
\\SV-F52\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2014\budget summary as of 2013 08 13
CPI as Published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics 1 7/18/2013
Comparing Change from 2010 to 2013
U.S.City Average
I CPi-U I CPI•W
January 2010 to January 2011 1.6 1.8
February 2010 to February 2011 2.1 2.3
March 2010 to March 2011 2.7 3.0
April 2010 to April 2011 3.2 3.6
May 2010 to May 2011 3.6 4,1
June 2010 to June 2011 3.6 4.1
July 2010 to July 2011 3.6 4.1
August 2010 to August 2011 3.8 4.3
September 2010 to September 2011 3.9 4.4
October 2010 to October 2011 3.5 3.9
November 2010 to November 2011 3,4 3.8
December 2010 to December 2011 3.0 3,2
January 2011 to January 2012 2.9 3.1
February 2011 to February 2012 2.9 3.1
March 2011 to March 2012 2.7 2.9
April 2011 to April 2012 2.3 2.4
May 2011 to May 2012 1.7 1.6
June 2011 to June 2012 1.7 1.6
July 2011 to July 2012 1.4 1.3
August 2011 to August 2012 1.7 1.7
September 2011 to September 2012 2.0 2.0
October 2011 to October 2012 2.2 2.2
November 2011 to November 2012 1.8 1.7
December 2011 to December 2012 1.7 1.7
January 2012 to January 2013 1.6 1.5
February 2012 to February 2013 2.0 1.9
March 2012 to March 2013 1.5 1.3
April 2012 to April 2013 1.1 0.9
May 2012 to May 2013 1.4 1.2
June 2012 to June 2013 1.8 1.8
July 2012 to July 2013
August 2012 to August 2013
September 2012 to September 2013
October 2012 to October 2013
November 2012 to November 2013
December 2012 to December 2013
Page 18 of 18
City of Spokane Valley
2014 Budget Discussion
Administrative Report on
2014 Revenues and Expenditures
August 13, 2013
1
2014 Budget Summary
All Funds
Total appropriations across all City Funds of $55.6 million
including:
$37.4 million in the General Fund which is comprised of $36.8
million recurring and $586,650 nonrecurring.
$18.2 million spread across 19 additional funds.
$9.4 million in capital expenditures.
FTE count will increase by 2.0 employees from 85.25 in
2013 to 87.25 in 2014.
2
General Fund
REVENUES:
16 Total recurring 2014 revenues of $36,823,500 as
compared to $35,274,700 in 2013 for an increase of
$1 ,548,800 or 4.39%.
NI All revenue estimates are based upon a combination of
historical collections and future projections with some
increasing and others decreasing.
• 2 largest sources are Sales Tax and Property Tax which
are collectively estimated to account for $29,514,400 or
80% of 2014 General Fund revenues.
General Fund
General sales tax collections are estimated at
$16,390,000, an increase of $1 , 140,000 or 7.5% over the
2013 Budget.
Property Tax levy is not proposed to include the 1 %
increase authorized by State law.
2014 Levy is estimated at $11 ,049,400
Levy assumes we start with the 2013 levy of $10,899,437 +
estimated new construction of $150,000.
4
General Fund
EXPENDITURES:
h. 2014 recurring expenditure proposal of $36,823,010 as
compared to $35,312,674 in 2013 for an increase of
$1 ,510,336 or 4.28%. The increase is comprised of:
$1 ,245,443 that is public safety related (reflecting a 5.63%
increase over 2013).
$264,893 that is non-public safety related (reflecting a 2.01 %
increase over 2013).
General Fund
Recurring revenues currently exceed recurring
expenditures by $490.
• Nonrecurring expenditures total $586,650 and include:
a $192,500 transfer to Fund #309 — Park Capital Projects
$350,000 for a law enforcement contingency
$8,800 for AutoCAD licenses for Public Works
$11 ,350 for replacement chairs at CenterPlace
$24,000 for improvements at the police precinct
General Fund
The total of 2014 recurring and nonrecurring expenditures
exceeds total revenues by $586, 160.
• Projected fund balance at the end of 2014 is currently
$20, 149,703 or 54.27% of recurring expenditures.
Other Funds
Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax revenue that is collected by the
State and remitted to the Street Fund is anticipated to be
$1 ,858,600.
Telephone Taxes that are remitted to the City and support
Street Fund operations and maintenance are anticipated
to be $2,750,000.
Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) revenues that are in large
part used to match grant financed street projects are
anticipated to total $1 ,200,000.
8
Other Funds
Hotel/Motel Tax revenues that are dedicated to the
promotion of visitors and tourism are anticipated to be
$490,000.
Stormwater Management Fees of $1 ,835,000.
Aquifer Protection Area fees of $500,000.
9
Future Council Budget Discussions
Aug. 27 — Public Hearing #1 on revenues and
expenditures
• Sept. 17 — City Manager presentation of Preliminary 2014
Budget
NI Sept. 24 — Public hearing #2 on 2014 Budget
• Oct. 8 — First reading of ordinance adopting 2014 Budget.
• Oct. 22 — Second reading of ordinance adopting 2014
Budget.
11SV-FS21UserslmcathounlCity DepartmentslFinance12013 Lodging Tax1RCA 2013 0813 Council Goals and Priorities for
Lodging Tax,docx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: August 13, 2013 Department Director Approval: Ix
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information g admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Council Goals and Priorities for Lodging Tax
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Imposition of tax, set-up of lodging tax advisory committee and
determination of qualified expenditures is governed by RCW 67.28, as amended by Engrossed
Substitute House Bill 1253, and SVMC 3.20.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Each year the annual budget development process
includes the City Council determined allocation of Lodging Tax proceeds. During calendar year
2013:
• At the February 26, 2013 Council workshop Council discussed developing a formal and
repeatable methodology to guide the City in future tax allocation decisions but no action could
be taken pending the Washington State Legislatures deliberations on this topic,
• At the June 11, 2013 Council meeting Council discussed changes in lodging tax legislation.
COUNCIL GOALS AND PRIORITIES FOR USE OF LODGING TAX REVENUES
Council may develop goals and priorities that it will take into account when making selections and
final distribution of lodging tax revenues from the candidates and recommended amounts proposed
by the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee. While Council cannot direct the Lodging Tax Advisory
Committee as to how the Committee makes its selections and recommended amounts, Council
should consider developing such goals and priorities and conveying those goals to the Lodging Tax
Advisory Committee prior to the selection process. Staff has identified the following possibilities for
Council to consider recommending. These suggestions are meant to give Council a starting point in
discussing and developing goals and priorities.
1. The Council will distribute lodging tax revenues to organizations on the basis of application
materials and the recommendation of the lodging tax advisory committee and will make a direct
award based on an historical amount to CenterPlace to continue promoting tourism activity
through that facility.
2. Council desires to focus on all aspects of allowable lodging tax revenue uses by allocating
portions of the available lodging tax revenues to each category specified in RCW 67.28.1816,
as amended by Engrossed Substitute House Bill 1253:
a. Tourism marketing
b. The marketing and operations of special events and festivals
c. The operation and capital expenditures of tourism related facilities owned or operated by a
municipality or public facility district
d. The operation (but not capital expenditures) of tourism related facilities owned or operated
by non-profit organizations.
1
11SV-FS21UserslmcalhountCity DepartmentslFinance12013 Lodging TaxIRCA 2013 08 13 Council Goals and Priorities for
Lodging Tax.docx
3. To consider the economic impact derived through the expenditure of lodging tax proceeds of all
major components of our tourism-based economy including shopping, dining, and overnight
visits.
The Councilmember who is the chairperson of the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee will convey
council goals and priorities to the Committee.
DEVELOP GENERAL PROCEDURES
In addition to Council goals and priorities, there are also outstanding procedural questions due to
recent changes under ESHB 1253.
• Per RCW 67.28 Council has the ability to decline the award of specific proposals made by the
lodging tax committee but cannot change the amount of the recommended award. In the event
Council agrees to some but not all of the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee recommendations
some money may be "left over". Prior to advertising for applications, determine whether the City
would conduct one application process or multiple processes each year in the event of such "left
over" lodging tax revenues.
2013 LODGING TAX APPROPRIATION TIMELINE
The calendar we plan to follow in 2013 for 2014 lodging tax awards is as follows:
Wed 9/4/2013 City runs notice in newspaper, places on web site, and sends letters to
2013 award recipients and others agencies that may have expressed
interest.
Fri 10/4/2013 Grant proposals are due to City by 4pm (no late submittals will be
accepted).
Fri 10/11/2013 Applications sent to Lodging Tax Advisory Committee for review.
Wed 10/16/2013 * 8:30 am Applicant presentations to Committee.
Tues 11/5/2013 Council Study Session
Admin Report: LTAC Recommendations to City Council
Tues 12/10/2013 * Formal Council Meeting
City Council Motion Consideration: Award Lodging Tax for 2014
RCW 67.28.1817 requires that the City wait for a period of at least 45 days after the LTAC
meeting before action can be taken by the City Coucil.
* 12/10/2013
* 10/16/2013
55 days
Because we currently anticipate the 2014 Budget will be adopted on October 22, 2013, it is possible
the amount of lodging tax ultimately awarded on December 10, 2013 may differ from the amount
appropriated in the budget. If this were to occur, just as we are doing with the lodging tax award in
2013, we will amend the 2014 Budget if necessary.
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
City of Spokane Valley History
Since its inception, the City has made annual distributions of lodging tax monies for the purpose
of attracting visitors and tourists to our community. In that time however, no formal and
2
IISV-l=S2lUsersimcalhounlCity Departrnents{Finance12013 Lodging Tax4RCA 2013 08 13 Council Goals and Priorities for
Lodging Tax.docx
repeatable methodology has been implemented to guide the City Council as to how it should
proceed in these matters. At the February 26, 2013 Council workshop the Council discussed
developing a funding methodology. At that time, Engrossed Substitute House Bill 1253 was
being heavily debated by the Legislature it was unknown whether it would pass and if it did,
what the final provisions would say. Consequently, Council placed this topic on hold.
Washington State Legislature - Engrossed Substitute House Bill 1253
ESHB 1253 was passed and approved May 10, 2013, by the Washington State Legislature.
This legislation addressed the expanded uses of lodging tax that were put in place beginning in
2007 and set to lapse June 30, 2013.
As adopted, ESHB 1253 amends the uses of lodging tax revenue, application process, selection
process, and reporting requirements set forth in RCW 67.28.1816. ESHB 1253 specifically
retains the City's authority to use lodging tax revenues to fund:
• Tourism marketing.
• The marketing and operations of special events and festivals.
• The operations and capital expenditures of tourism-related facilities owned or operated by a
municipality or public facility district.
• The operations (but not capital expenditures) of tourism-related facilities owned or operated
by non-profit organizations.
The primary change from the current allowable uses is to eliminate the use of lodging tax
revenues to fund capital expenditures of tourism-related facilities owned or operated by non-
profit organizations. Tourism marketing was also specifically added as an allowable use in
ESHB 1253. Other allowable uses remain unchanged.
ESHB also establishes new application and reporting procedures. In cities over 5,000
population, applicants must submit their applications to the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee,
estimating how money received will result in increases in the number of people traveling for
business or pleasure on a trip:
• Away from their place of residence or business and staying overnight in paid
accommodations;
• To a place 50 miles or more one way from their place of residence or business for the day or
staying overnight; or
• From another country or state outside their place of residence or their business.
Selection Process
Once applicants submit their application, the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee will review all
applications (which must include the estimates listed above). The Lodging Tax Advisory
Committee may only select candidates from the applicants. The Lodging Tax Advisory
Committee will create a list of candidates and recommended amounts for City Council approval.
The City Council may only approve candidates and the recommended amounts from the list
provided by the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee. The City Council may choose to make
awards to all, some, or none of the recommended candidates in the amounts recommended by
the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee.
Reporting Requirements
Recipients must provide a report to the City describing the actual number of people traveling for
business or pleasure on a trip:
• Away from their place of residence or business and staying overnight in paid
accommodations;
3
11SV-FS2Userslmcalhoun1City DepartrnentslFinance42013 Lodging Tax1RCA 2013 08 13 Council Goals and Priorities for
Lodging Tax.docx
• To a place 50 miles or more one way from their place of residence or business for the day or
staying overnight; or
• From another country or state outside their place of residence or their business.
The report must be made available to the City Council and the public and must be furnished to
the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee (JLARC) and the Lodging Tax Advisory
Committee. The JLARC will provide biennial reports to the Washington State Legislature.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: This is a discussion topic and no action is being sought
at this time. We are, however, seeking Council direction:
• that will impact the 2014 Budget development process (as it relates to whether we intend to
continue the historical practice of providing lodging tax money to partially offset CenterPlace
advertising costs),
• Council goals and priorities it might wish to convey to the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee as
the Committee begins the 2014 application process.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The Lodging Tax appropriation ranges from approximately
$450,000 to $500,000 per year.
STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun and Erik Lamb
ATTACHMENTS:
• Lodging Tax awards —2008 through 2013.
• Hotel/Motel Tax revenue history—2004 through 2013.
4
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA
2007-2013 Lodging Tax Awards
\\SV-FS2\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2013\Lodging Tax\Award History
2008
Award
2009
Award
2010
Award
2011
Award
2012
Award Award -Rd 2
Centerplace 90,000 90,000 37,500 0 30,000 0
City directed marketing efforts 0 0 0 0 0 0
HUB Sports Center 0 0 0 40,000 42,600 0
Spokane County Fair& Expo Center 30,000 18,250 0 0 0 25,900
Spokane Regional C&V Bureau 306,000 236,000 195,000 250,000 0 251,720
Spokane Regional Sports Commission 145,000 115,000 120,000 165,000 185,000 0
Spokane Valley Heritage Museum 0 3,250 5,000 5,000 3,900 1,100
Spokane Winery 8,300 0 0 0 0 0
Valleyfest 30,000 27,500 30,000 36,000 0 30,000
2010 Figure Skating Championships 15,000 15,000 0 0 0 0
Subtotal n/a n/a n/a n/a 261,500 308,720
1 12/13/2012
2013
Award
30,000
55,000
21,100
27,800
184,800
150,200
6,400
0
35,200
0
n/a
Annual Totals 624,300 505,000 387,500 496,000 570,220 510,500
7/31/20131
2003 1
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA
Hotel/Motel Tax Receipts through- June
Actual for the years 2004 through 2013
IISV-FS21UserslmcalhounlTax RevenuelLodging Tax120131105 hotel motel tax 2013
2004 1 2005 J 2006
2007 I 2008
January 16,993.58 20,691.03 20,653.49 25,137.92
February 18,161.04 19,976.81 20,946.09 25,310.66
March 18,182.01 22,828.15 24,308.48 29,190.35
April 26,897.82 29,748.41 34,371.82 37,950.53
May 16,440.37 29,017.66 32,522.06 31,371.01
June 53,284.01 35,330.35 34,256.71 36,267.07
28,946.96
24,623.06
27,509.99
40,406.02
36,828.53
46,659.88
2009 I 2010 I 2011
23,280.21
23,283.95
25,272.02
36,253.63
32,588.80
40,414.59
22,706.96
23,416.94
24,232.35
39,463.49
34,683.32
39,935.36
22,212.21
22,792.14
24,611.28
38,230.49
33,790.69
41,403.41
2012
2013
21,442.32
21,548.82
25,654.64
52,130.37
37,478.44
43,970.70
2013 to 2012
Difference
24,184.84 2,743 12.79%
25,974.98 4,426 20.54%
27,738.65 2,084 8.12%
40,979.25 (11,151) (21.39%)
40,560.41 3,082 8.22%
47,850.15 3,879 8.82%
Total Collections 149,958.83 157,592.41 167,058.65 185,227.54 204,974.44 181,093.20 184,438.42 183,040.22 202,225.29 207,288.28
July 42,120.26 43,841.82 49,744.62 56,281.99 50,421.37 43,950.26 47,385.18 49,311.97 52,818.60 0.00
August 43,649.84 46,852.10 45,916.16 51,120.70 50,818.35 50,146.56 54,922.99 57,451.68 57,229.23 0.00
September 39,390.66 46,746.18 50,126.53 57,260.34 60,711.89 50,817.62 59,418.96 58,908.16 64,298.70 0.00
October 33,004.62 34,966.85 38,674.17 43,969.74 38,290.46 36,784.36 41,272.35 39,028.08 43,698.90 0.00
November 32,176.61 26,089.36 36,417.11 36,340.64 35,582.59 34,054.79 34,329.78 37,339.36 39,301.22 0.00
December 23,142.70 31,740.18 29,147.15 31,377.41 26,290.11 27,131.43 26,776.84 32,523.19 30,432.13 0.00
Total Collections 363,443.52 387,828.90 417,084.39 461,578.36 467,089.21 423,978.22 448,544.52 457,602.66 490,004.07 207,288.28
Budget Estimate 380,000.00 436,827.00 350,000.00 400,000.00 400,000.00 512,000.00 380,000.00 480,000.00 430,000.00 460,000.00
Actual over(under)budg (16,556.48) (48,998.10) 67,084.39 61,578.36 67,089.21 (88,021,78) 68,544.52 (22,397.34) 60,004.07 (252,711.72)
Total actual collections
as a%Q of total budget 95.64% 88.78% 119.17% 115.39% 116.77% 82.81% 118.04% 95.33% 113.95% n/a
5,063 2.50%
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
11,527.32
32,512.11
44,039.43
38,580.48
54,974.74
30,718,23
36,960.11
23,044.56
28,825.30
257,142.85
419,000.00
(161,857.15)
61.37%
%change in annual
total collected 41.34% 6.71% 7.54% 10.67% 1.19% (9.23%) 5.79% 2.02% 7.08% nla n/a
%of budget collected
through June 39.46% 36.08% 47.73% 46.31% 51.24% 35.37% 48.54% 38.13% 47.03% 45.06%
%of actual total collected
through June
41.26% 40.63% 40.05% 40.13% 43.88% 42.71% 41.12% 40.00% 41.27% nla
Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of
June
250,000.00
&June
M May
M April
March
•February
■January
200,000.00
?"
150,000.00
100,000.00
50,000.00
0.00
<_
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
.
2010
2011
,
2012
2013
10.51%
17.13%
Page 20
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: August 13, 2013 Department Director Approval: ❑
Check all that apply: [' consent ❑ old business [' new business [' public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report [' pending legislation [' executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Intergovernmental Agreement for Commute Trip Reduction
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 70.94
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: The Council authorized the City Manager to execute
interlocal agreement C11-146 on September 13, 2011.
BACKGROUND: The attached interlocal agreement is between Spokane County and the City
of Spokane Valley. The agreement allows the Spokane County Commute Trip Reduction (CTR)
department to retain the City's state-issued CTR funds in return for developing, implementing,
and administering CTR plans and ordinances for all affected employers within the City of
Spokane Valley.
This agreement replaces the previous agreement, C11-146, which expired June 30, 2013. The
agreement is for two years and would expire June 30, 2015. There are no substantive changes
from the previous agreement. The legal department has reviewed the agreement.
OPTIONS: 1.) Authorize staff to place the agreement on the next Council Consent Agenda,
with or without modification;
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Council consensus to place this Interlocal
agreement on the next Council Consent Agenda.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The County would retain the City's state funds of
$61,772.39. If the agreement is not approved, the City would have to dedicate these funds to
the CTR program and administer the CTR programs of all 17 affected employers in Spokane
Valley.
STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Koudelka, Senior Administrative Analyst
ATTACHMENTS: Interlocal Agreement
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT
Between Spokane County and the City of Spokane Valley
Regarding Commute Trip Reduction Implementation
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 2011
2013 by and between the City of Spokane Valley, a municipal corporation of the State of
Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite
106, Spokane Valley, WA, 99206, hereinafter referred to as the "City" and Spokane County, a
political subdivision of the State of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at
West 1026 Broadway Avenue, Spokane,Washington, 99260, hereinafter referred to as the
"County,"jointly hereinafter referred to as the "Parties."
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the Washington State Legislature has adopted legislation codified in RCW
70.94.521 through 551, the purpose of which is to improve air quality, improve transportation
system efficiency and reduce the consumption of petroleum fuels through employer-based
programs that encourage the use of alternatives to the single occupant vehicle for commute trips
and reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT); and
WHEREAS, RCW 70.94.527 requires counties containing urban growth areas and cities
and towns with"major employers," that are located within urban growth areas with a state
highway segment exceeding the threshold of one hundred person hours of delay or jurisdictions
that are located in contiguous urban growth areas, or are within an urban growth area with a
population greater than seventy thousand people that adopted an ordinance before the year 2000
or jurisdictions that are located in contiguous urban growth areas, or contain a major
employment installation in an affected county to develop ordinances,plans and programs to
reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and Single Occupant Vehicle (SOV) commute trips, and
thereby reduce vehicle-related air pollution, traffic congestion and energy use, and
WHEREAS, the County and each affected city within Spokane County have adopted
Commute Trip Reduction Ordinances and must implement a Commute Trip Reduction (CTR)
Plan for all major employers; and
WHEREAS,the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Public
Transportation Division is responsible for administering funds on behalf of the state Legislature
and is desirous of making available to Spokane County certain funds and requiring Spokane
County to enter into agreements through the Interlocal Cooperation Act or by Resolution or
Ordinance as appropriate with other jurisdictions,local transit agencies,or regional transportation
planning organizations to coordinate the development,implementation and administration of CTR Plans
and Ordinances as described in RCW 70.94.521-551.
Page - 1
WHEREAS, Spokane County has entered into an agreement with WSDOT under
I Agreement No. GCA6900GCB1570, hereinafter referred to as "WSDOT Agreement," pursuant
to which Spokane County is eligible to receive a reimbursable amount of funds which the
County will distribute to itself and cities to implement and administer CTR Plans and
Ordinances; and
WHEREAS, Spokane County has allocated $62,390.17$61,772.39 to the City from the
Agreement No. GCA6900 GCB 1570 which the City is now desirous of making available to the
County to perform those tasks which are the responsibility of the City.
NOW,THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises set forth
hereinafter, and as authorized under chapter RCW 70.94.527 (5), the parties hereto do mutually
agree as follows:
Section 1: PURPOSE
The County has entered into a WSDOT Agreement with the WSDOT under which it will
receive $367,001 for two years. This funding is to be allocated to the County and cities within
Spokane County for their use in the implementation and administration of their CTR Plans and
Ordinances. The County, based upon an allocation formula established by the WSDOT, has
I determined that the City shall receive $62,390.17$61,772.39 from the WSDOT Agreement from
which it shall perform certain tasks. The City agrees to its proportionate share of the monies
made available to the County in the WSDOT Agreement and agrees to allow Spokane County to
retain its proportionate share in consideration of the County performing those tasks as more
particularly set forth in Attachment "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In
conjunction with allowing the County to retain its proportionate share of monies, the City will
execute any and all necessary documents which may be required by the WSDOT.
It is understood by the parties hereto, that in order for the County to perform those tasks
as set forth in Attachment "A" for the City, the City must perform certain tasks. Attached hereto
as Attachment "B" and incorporated herein by reference, is a listing of tasks which the City
agrees to perform in conjunction with the County performing those tasks set forth in Attachment
Section 2: DURATION
The County agrees to provide those tasks set forth in Section 1 and complete performing
I such tasks on or before June 30, 20132015.
Section 3: TERMINATION
The parties agree that this Agreement may be terminated by either party for material
breach of any provision set forth herein, upon ninety (90) days advance written notice to the
other party at the address set forth hereinabove. Provided, however, the parties agree that any
notification of termination shall set forth the specific provision(s)for which such notification is
Page - 2
being provided and additionally, advise that if such default is cured within such ninety (90) day
time frame, said termination notification shall be of no force and effect.
In the event of termination, the County agrees to provide to the City all written
documentation which it has completed to the date of termination under the terms of this
Agreement. Additionally, the County agrees to return to the City that portion of the monies set
forth in Section 1 hereinabove, which has not been expended by the county, prior to the date of
termination, on the City's behalf in providing those tasks as set forth in Attachment "A."
Provided, further, the parties recognize that the WSDOT in Agreement No.
I GCA6904GCB1570, has retained the right to unilaterally terminate all or a part of such contract
if there is a reduction of funds from the funding source. Accordingly, in the event that the
WSDOT terminates all or part of the WSDOT Agreement with Spokane County, and such action
affects the allocation of funds by the County to the City herein, and/or modifies the tasks to be
performed hereunder, the parties will immediately meet to renegotiate the provisions of this
Agreement.
Section 4: DESIGNATION OF ADMINISTRATOR
The County hereby designated Ms. Aurora J. Crooks, the Spokane County Transportation
Demand Management Manager, as its designee for the purpose of administering and
coordinating the County's responsibilities under the terms of this Agreement.
Section 5: ACQUISITION/DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY
The parties hereto agree that any real or personal property acquired by the County with
those monies made available to the County by the City under Section 1 hereinabove shall be and
remain the sole property of the County upon acquisition and/or termination of this Agreement.
Section 6: COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
The County agrees to observe all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances and
regulations including, but no necessarily limited to, the Americans with Disabilities Act and
chapter 49.60 RCW, to the extent that they may have any bearing on performing those tasks for
the City as set forth in Section 1 hereinabove. Additionally, the County agrees to comply with all
applicable funding audit requirements of WSDOT in conjunction with performing those tasks for
the City. The County agrees to make available to the City or its duly authorized representative
during normal County business hours and all records which it has kept in conjunction with
providing those services for the City as set forth herein above.
Section 7: NOTICES
All notices or other communications given under this Agreement shall be considered given
on the day such notices or other communications are received when sent by personal delivery; or the
Page - 3
third day following the day on which the notice or communication has been mailed by certified mail
delivery, receipt requested and postage prepaid addressed to the other Party at the address set forth
below, or at such other address as the Parties shall from time-to-time designate by notice in writing
to the other Party:
CITY: City Clerk
City of Spokane Valley
11707 E. Sprague Avenue, Suite 106
Spokane Valley, WA, 99206
COUNTY: Board of County Commissioners
Spokane County Courthouse
1116 West Broadway Avenue
Spokane, Washington 99260
Section 8: HEADINGS
The section headings in this Agreement have been inserted solely for the purpose of
convenience and ready reference. In no way do they purport to, and shall not be deemed to,
define, limit or extend the scope or intent of the sections to which they appertain.
Section 9: MODIFICATION
No modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be valid until the same is reduced
to writing and executed with the same formalities as this present Agreement.
Section 10: ALL WRITINGS CONTAINED HEREIN
This Agreement contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the Parties.No
other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement shall be
deemed to exist or to bind any of the Parties hereto. The City has read and understands all of this
Agreement, and now states that no representation, promise or agreement not expressed in this
Agreement has been made to induce the City to execute the same.
Section 11: LIABILITY
The County shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers and
employees from all claims, demands, or suits in law or equity arising from the County's
intentional or negligent acts or breach of its obligations under the Agreement. The County's
duty to indemnify shall not apply to loss or liability caused by the intentional or negligent acts of
the City, its officers and employees.
The City shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the County, its officers and
employees from all claims, demands, or suits in law or equity arising from the City's intentional
or negligent acts or breach of its obligations under the Agreement. The City's duty to indemnify
Page - 4
shall not apply to loss or liability caused by the intentional or negligent acts of the County, its
officers and employees.
If the comparative negligence of the Parties and their officers and employees is a cause of
such damage or injury, the liability, loss, cost, or expense shall be shared between the Parties in
proportion to their relative degree of negligence and the right of indemnity shall apply to such
proportion.
Where an officer or employee of a Party is acting under the direction and control of the
other Party, the Party directing and controlling the officer or employee in the activity and/or
omission giving rise to liability shall accept all liability for the other Party's officer or
employee's negligence.
Each Party's duty to indemnify shall survive the termination or expiration of the
Agreement.
Each Party waives, with respect to the other Party only, its immunity under RCW Title
51, Industrial Insurance. The Parties have specifically negotiated this provision.
Section 12: ANTI-KICKBACK
No officer or employee of the City, having the power or duty to perform an official act
or action related to this Agreement shall have or acquire any interest in the Agreement, or have
solicited, accepted or granted a present or future gift, favor, service or other thing of value from or
to any person involved in the Agreement.
Section 13: VENUE STIPULATION
This Agreement has been and shall be construed as having been made and delivered
within the State of Washington. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of
Washington both as to interpretation and performance. Any action at law, suit in equity or judicial
proceeding for the enforcement of this Agreement, or any of its provisions, shall be instituted only
in courts of competent jurisdiction within Spokane County,Washington.
Section 14: COUNTERPARTS
This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which, when so
executed and delivered, shall be an original, but such counterparts shall together constitute but
one and the same.
Section 15: SEVERABILITY
If any parts, terms or provisions of this Agreement are held by the courts to be illegal, the
validity of the remaining portions or provisions shall not be affected and the rights and
obligations of the Parties shall not be affected in regard to the remainder of the Agreement. If it
should appear that any part, term or provision of this Agreement is in conflict with any statutory
provision of the State of Washington, then the part, term or provision thereof that may be in
Page - 5
conflict shall be deemed inoperative and null and void insofar as it may be in conflict therewith
and this Agreement shall be deemed to modify to conform to such statutory provision.
Section 16: RCW 39.34 REQUIRED CLAUSES
A. PURPOSE: See Section 1.
B. DURATION: See Section 2.
C. ORGANIZATION OF SEPARATE ENTITY AND ITS POWERS: No new or separate
legal or administrative entity is created to administer the provisions of this Agreement.
D. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES: See Agreement provisions.
E. AGREEMENT TO BE FILED: The City shall file this Agreement with its City Clerk. The
County shall file this Agreement with its County Auditor or place it on its web site or other
electronically retrievable public source.
F. FINANCING: See Section 1.
G. TERMINATION: See Section 3.
H. PROPERTY UPON TERMINATION: See Section 5.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands and seals
the day and year first above written.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Al FrenchShelly O'Quinn, Chair
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Todd MielkeAl French, Vice Chair
Mike Jackson, City Manager
Mark RichardTodd Mielke, Commissioner
ATTEST:
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
ATTEST:
Approved by:
By
Daniela Erickson
Office of the City Attorney Clerk of the Board
Page - 6
Exhibit I
Funding Allocation Methodology
RCW 70.94.544 authorizes the CTR Board to determine the allocation of program funds
made available for the purpose of implementing CTR plans. The funding allocated for local
implementation of CTR activities in July 1, 2011 2013 through June 30, 2013 2015 is based
on the decision taken by the CTR Board at its May 20, 2011April 26, 2013 meeting
Page - 7
ATTACHMENT "A"
STATEMENT OF WORK
The County will:
1. Promote consistency within all affected local government jurisdictions within Spokane
County, while serving the City's specific needs.
2. Maintain and administer the City's CTR Ordinances and Plan.
3. Employ a full-time Transportation Demand Management Manager to administer the
County's and City's CTR Plans and Ordinances.
4. Take reasonable measures to identify and notify all affected employers within the City.
5. Assist each affected employer within the City in preparing a program and promoting
the principles of Transportation Demand Management (TDM)with the employer's
employees.
6. Maintain an appeals process consistent with RCW 70.94.537(2)(e)by which major
employers,who as a result of special characteristics of their business or its locations
would be unable to meet the requirements of a commute trip reduction plan, may obtain a
waiver or modification of those requirements and criteria for determining eligibility for
waiver or modification. Within 30 days from the date of approval, submit to WSDOT the
name and employer identification code for any worksite that has been granted an
exemption. Include information about the duration of all exemptions and information on
the type of modification granted.
7. Submit to WSDOT periodic progress reports summarizing the overall CTR
implementation costs incurred by the County and shall be reported in a format provided
by WSDOT.
8. Provide WSDOT with a public hearing notice and copies of any proposed amendments to
the CTR ordinance,plan, and/or administrative guidelines within the first week of the
public review period and final copies of all actions within one (1)month of adoption.
9. Coordinate and administer baseline and measurement CTR employer surveys. Provide
employer survey assistance, training and state-supplied survey forms.
10. Notify WSDOT prior to sending any surveys to University of Washington for processing.
The notification must include the name of the worksite, employer identification code and
type of survey for each survey being submitted for processing. The notification shall be
Page - 8
submitted as an electronic spreadsheet via electronic mail. The County agrees to wait for
confirmation from WSDOT prior to sending or delivering the surveys for processing.
11. Provide WSDOT with updated lists of affected worksites and jurisdiction contacts on a
periodic basis or as requested by WSDOT. These updates will be submitted electronically
in a format specified by WSDOT.
12. Continue to monitor the programs of each of the affected employers in the City to
determine compliance with the CTR Ordinance and Plan. Complete annual review of
employer CTR programs including a determination as to whether the employer is acting
in good faith to meet the goals established by the CTR Law.
13. Provide on-going support to all employer designated Employee Transportation
Coordinators (ETCs) and assist ETCs in facilitating regular employer networking
opportunities and obtaining information necessary to perform their duties including
information materials that explain a range of measures and activities to encourage
employee use of commute alternatives.
14. Market available services to affected employers to assist in accomplishing CTR goals.
15. Work collaboratively with and provide technical guidance and support to employers in
developing successful CTR programs.
16. Conduct at least one Basic ETC Training Course per year,using WSDOT-provided
ETC Handbook and other training materials reviewed and approved by WSDOT.
17. Provide employers with written information on basic requirements of the CTR
ordinance and goals set forth in approved CTR plans.
18. Attend transportation or health/benefits fairs at affected employer worksites to encourage
high-occupancy vehicle commuting and promote the employer's CTR program.
19. Design, construct and distribute worksite Commuting Options Boards. Provide
professional materials such as brochures, flyers, posters,newsletters, clip art and other
tools to assist employer implementation of worksite CTR programs.
20. Provide all affected employers with the WSDOT-approved "Program Description&
Employer Annual Report" form. Ensure completed reports are submitted by affected
employers to meet applicable deadlines.
21. Submit to WSDOT periodic invoices along with progress reports that accurately assess
the progress made by County, on behalf of City, in implementing RCW 70.94.521-551.
Report contents include:
a. Detailed summary of CTR events and projects, including implementation
assistance provided to affected employers within the City;
Page - 9
b. Actual total CTR expenditures used by the County for all state CTR funds
expended by the County during the previous quarter for the purpose of CTR
implementation using WSDOT pre-approved format;
c. Updated list of affected employers and worksites (electronic);
d. Total number of worksites by jurisdiction;
e. List of sites which have applied for exemptions or modifications;
22. Establish and maintain books, records, documents and other evidence and accounting
procedures and practices sufficient to reflect properly all direct and indirect costs of
whatever nature claimed to have been incurred and anticipated to be incurred solely
for the performance of this Agreement. Establish and maintain a separate "CTR
Account" within Spokane County along with supporting documentation such as payroll
and time records, invoices, contracts,vouchers or products proving in proper detail the
nature and propriety of the charges.
23. Participate in local implementation of statewide CTR public awareness and
recognition programs developed by WSDOT.
24. Offer recommendations to the City for policies on parking and site design which will
encourage the use of alternative transportation modes.
25. Encourage employers to develop site designs and improvements to office and
industrial sites that promote the use of alternative transportation modes.
26. Assist WSDOT with CTR evaluation.
27. Serve as liaison between WSDOT and cities, towns, transit agencies and regional
transportation planning organizations for the purpose of RCW 70.94.521-551.
28. Continue applying for funding opportunities to further encourage the use of commute
alternatives.
Page - 10
ATTACHMENT "B"
STATEMENT OF WORK
The City will:
1. Provide Spokane County with copies of any proposed amendments to the CTR Plan
and Ordinance.
2. Provide Spokane County with copies of any CTR-related amendments to parking
ordinances prior to public review.
3. Develop, implement and maintain its own CTR Program as an affected employer or as
otherwise specified in the CTR Board Guidelines or RCW 70.94.521-551.
4. Reimburse the County for the services provided by this Agreement in an amount equal
to the City's share of the CTR funding as provided in RCW 70.94.544.
Page - 11
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: August 13, 2013 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2013 Street Preservation Project Phase 2 Update
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: March 27, 2012 council approved the Pavement
Management Plan Update for 2011; October 30, 2012 council approved the 2013 Budget which
included $2.054 million for street preservation projects in 2013; Info Memo on March 5, 2013
with 2013 Street Preservation Projects Update; Bid Award on March 12, 2013 for Phase 1 —
Sullivan Road Street Preservation Project; Info Memo on April 2, 2013 with 2013 Street
Preservation Projects Update; Info RCA on June 11 with an update on the 2013 Street
Preservation Projects.
BACKGROUND: The 2013 Street Preservation Phase 2 project consists of the following four
federally funded projects:
• Sprague Ave — Herald to University
• Sprague Ave (EB only) — Havana to Fancher
• Sprague Ave — Fancher to Thierman
• Argonne Road — Sprague to Broadway
Due to a combination of the federal process and the need to pave some areas at night, the
construction of these projects will be delayed until spring next year.
At the beginning of this year it was anticipated that the design, environmental process and
construction of these projects could be completed in one year. Unfortunately, the right-of-way
process took longer than expected. Now, due to the lateness of the bid, it is recommended that
construction of the project be delayed to the spring of 2014.
The scope of this preservation project involves some night work to minimize impacts to the
travelling public, especially at the Sprague/Fancher intersection. The westbound off-ramp from
1-90 must be closed to grind and pave this intersection and WSDOT has approved this closure
for night time hours only.
Paving at night can be problematic this late in the season. The paving temperature specification
can be difficult to meet in October as the average low temperatures are around 38-40 degrees
Fahrenheit, which is too cold for paving.
Staff proposes to proceed with bidding the project this year. The anticipated schedule assuming
CN funds are approved by August 13 is as follows:
August 16 Advertise for bids (3 weeks minimum)
Sept 6 Open Bids
Sept 9 WSDOT reviews DBEs and approves Contractor Award
Sept 17 Council Awards project
Oct 1 Contractor submits executed contract
Oct 4 City executes contract
Spring 2014 Contractor begins work
OPTIONS: Discussion
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Council approved $2.054 million in the 2013 Budget for the
2013 Street Preservation projects. The estimated cost for this project is $1,540,613. The
federal STP(U) grant share of 86.5% is $1,332,630. The City's local share is $207,983, of
which approximately $188,300 is stormwater work that will be paid from Fund 402.
STAFF CONTACT: Eric Guth, PE - Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS:
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: August 13, 2013 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: [' consent ❑ old business [' new business [' public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report [' pending legislation [' executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Park Acquisition Needs
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: N/A
BACKGROUND: As Council is aware, staff has been in the process of updating the original
Park & Recreation Master Plan this past year. Several public meetings have been held for
public input on the plan as well as the conducting of a citizen survey. The updated plan is
nearing its final draft state and it is anticipated to be complete this fall.
One of the main focuses or themes of the draft plan update is park acquisition. In both the
original and updated plans, the current level of available park property is not meeting the current
needs of our citizens or their future needs. The City is lacking in several special use facilities.
The City's Comprehensive Plan supports the concept of adding additional park acres to the
current inventory and that preserving selected undeveloped lands as open space.
The former Painted Hills Golf Course property is for sale. The potential acquisition of this
property could provide numerous opportunities for our citizens that are identified in the Park &
Recreation Master Plan update. Staff would like to engage the City Council on this subject.
OPTIONS: N/A
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: N/A
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: To be determined.
STAFF CONTACT: Michael D. Stone, CPRP. Director of Parks and Recreation
ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint Presentation
Park
Acquisition
Needs
Park Acquisition Needs
Original 2006 Park & Recreation Master Plan
identified the need for additional park
property in the Painted Hills area
Current Park & Recreation Master Plan Draft
Update recommends a Community Park in
the south central area of our City
It suggests acquiring park land on or near the
former Painted Hills Golf Course
Park Acquisition Needs
n City' s Comprehensive Plan indicates:
To maintain the existing level of service the City
needs to add 58.89 acres by 2025
Acquisition of park property is encouraged to
provide a broad range of recreational
opportunities
Identify, evaluate and preserve as open space
selected undeveloped lands
Park Acquisition Needs
n Park & Recreation Master Plan Goals/Objectives
Prioritize the acquisition and development of
facilities that contribute to community identity and
community pride
Develop acquisition program to take advantage
of present opportunities to meet future needs
Acquire park land with unique natural features or
significant natural resources in order to preserve
them for present or future generations
Park Acquisition Needs
o Currently, the amount of park land
available is inadequate to meet current
and future needs
The City is lacking in several special use
facilities such as pet parks, skate parks, disc
golf course
Park Acquisition Needs
Painted Hills property is 91 acres.
Likely the last available large piece of
property in our City
Acquisition of site would fulfill Park &
Recreation Master Plan goal to acquire
Similar in size to Manito and Riverfront Parks;
twice as big as Mirabeau Point Park
Potential is immeasurable
Park Acquisition Needs
o Site could accommodate a wide variety of
activities
Walking/Hiking Trails
Pet Park
Community gathering; Banquet/Reception
venue
o Cross country skiing
o Playgrounds
t Sand Volleyball courts
Park Acquisition Needs
o Splashpads
Car show venue
o Skateboard park
Disc golf course
o Slacklining park
o Picnic areas
Farmers Market
o Driving range/Par 3 course? ?
Park Acquisition Needs
c Site would not need to be developed
immediately
Minimum maintenance required until site
is developed
Need to develop master plan/cost
estimate
Park Acquisition Needs
Summary:
Wonderful opportunity for our City
Property is for sale with a foreclosure sale on
September 13
Park & Recreation Master plan identifies the
need for a Community Park @ this location
Land acquisition is a priority in the updated Park
& Recreation Master Plan
DRAFT
ADVANCE AGENDA
For Planning Discussion Purposes Only
as of August 7,2013; 9:30 a.m.
Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative
To: Council & Staff
From: City Clerk, by direction of City Manager
Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings
August 20,2013, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Aug 12]
ACTION ITEMS:
1.Bid Award, Sullivan Road Bridge Drain Retrofit Project#0150—Steve Worley (5 minutes)
2. Bid Award,Wellesley Ave Sidewalk and Adams Rd Sidewalk Project#0168—Steve Worley(5 minutes)
3.Bid Award Carnahan,Indiana& Sprague St Preservation Project#0180—Steve Worley (5 minutes)
NON-ACTION ITEMS:
4. Crime Prevention Officer Update—Chief VanLeuven,Deputy Chris Johnston (25 minutes)
5.Avista Natural Gas Franchise—Cary Driskell (15 minutes)
6. Solid Waste Discussion—Mike Jackson (20 minutes)
7.Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 80 minutes]
August 27,2013,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Aug 19]
August Community Recognition, Presentation of Key and Certificate—Mayor Towey (5 minutes)
1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2014 Budget revenues(including prop taxes)—Mark Calhoun (15 minutes)
2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes,Motion set 9-24 hearing; Resolution Surplus items) (5 min)
3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance,Lighting Code Revisions—Marty Palaniuk (10 minutes)
4.First Reading Proposed Ordinance Avista Franchise—Cary Driskell (10 minutes)
5.Motion Consideration: Commute Trip Reduction Interlocal Agreement—Morgan Koudelka(10 minutes)
6.Motion Consideration: Bid Award, Sullivan Rd W.Bridge Replacement Phase 1-S.Worley (10 minutes)
7.Admin Report: SmartGov Public Portal—Mike Turbak,John Hohman (20 minutes)
8.Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
9. Information Only: (a)Dept Reports; (b)Planning Commission Minutes [*estimated meeting: 90 minutes]
Wed,Aug 28,2013: 8:30 a.m 11:30 a.m.Special Joint Meeting w/Board of County Commissioners et al
CenterPlace Regional Event Center, Room 109. Topic: Solid Waste
Sept 3, 2013, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Aug 26]
1. Outside Agency Presentations(Economic Development Agencies) (-30 minutes)
2. Outside Agency Presentations(social service agencies, 5 min each)—Mark Calhoun (-50 minutes)
3. Solid Waste Update—Eric Guth,Mike Jackson (15 minutes)
4.Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 100 minutes]
Friday, Sept 6, 2013, 10 a.m. —12:30 P.M. Spokane Regional Council of Governments, Fairgrounds
Sept 10,2013 No Meeting.Council attends"Spokane Valley Day at the Fair"
Sept 17,2013,Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Sept 9]
ACTION ITEMS:
1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes)
2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance Avista Franchise—Cary Driskell (10 minutes)
NON-ACTION ITEMS:
3. Presentation of 2014 Preliminary Budget—City Manager Jackson (30 minutes)
4.Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 50 minutes]
Draft Advance Agenda 8/8/2013 1:35:05 PM Page 1 of 3
Sept 24,2013,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Sept 16]
Sept Community Recognition, Presentation of Key and Certificate—Mayor Towey (5 minutes)
1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2014 Proposed Budget—Mark Calhoun (15 minutes)
2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes)
3.First Reading Proposed Ordinance for Street Vacation (Alki)—Marty Palaniuk (15 minutes)
4.First Reading Property Tax Ordinance—Mark Calhoun (10 minutes)
5.Motion Consideration: Allocations to Outside Agencies—Mark Calhoun (20 minutes)
6.Admin Report: Budget Amendment for 2013 —Mark Calhoun (15 minutes)
7.Admin Report: CDBG Potential Projects—Scott Kuhta (10 minutes)
8.Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
9. Information Only: (a)Dept Reports; (b)Planning Commission Minutes [*estimated meeting: 100 minutes]
Oct 1,2013, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Sept 23)
1.Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
Oct 8,2013,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Sept 30]
1. PUBLIC HEARING: CDBG Projects—Scott Kuhta (10 minutes)
2. PUBLIC HEARING: 2013 Budget Amendment—Mark Calhoun (15 minutes)
3. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes)
4. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance for Street Vacation (Alki)—Marty Palaniuk (10 minutes)
5. Second Reading Property Tax Ordinance—Mark Calhoun (10 minutes)
6.First Reading Ordinance Amending 2013 Budget—Mark Calhoun (10 minutes)
7.First Reading Ordinance Adopting 2014 Budget—Mark Calhoun (10 minutes)
8.Motion Consideration: Approval of CDBG Projects—Scott Kuhta (10 minutes)
9.Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 85 minutes]
Oct 15,2013, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Oct 7]
1.Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
Oct 22,2013,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Oct 14]
Oct Community Recognition, Presentation of Key and Certificate—Mayor Towey (5 minutes)
1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes)
2. Second Reading Ordinance Amending 2013 Budget—Mark Calhoun (10 minutes)
3. Second Reading Ordinance Adopting 2014 Budget—Mark Calhoun (10 minutes)
4.Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
5. Information Only: Dept Reports; Planning Commission Minutes [*estimated meeting: 35 minutes]
Oct 29,2013, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Oct 23]]
1.Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
Nov 5,2013, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Oct 28]
1. Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Recommendations to Council—Mark Calhoun (20 minutes)
2.Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 35 minutes]
Nov 12,2013,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. (possible no meeting) [due Mon,Nov 4]
1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes)
2.Admin Report: 2014 Fee Resolution—Mark Calhoun (15 minutes)
3.Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 25 minutes]
Draft Advance Agenda 8/8/2013 1:35:05 PM Page 2 of 3
Nov 13—16:NLC Conference,Seattle
Nov 19,2013, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Nov 11]
Nov Community Recognition, Presentation of Key and Certificate—Mayor Towey (5 minutes)
1.Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
Nov 26 2013,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Nov 18]
Oath of Office to Councilmember Position #1 (completing term vacated by B.Grassel) (5 minutes)
1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes)
2. Information Only: Dept Reports; Planning Commission Minutes
Dec 3,2013, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Nov 25)
1.Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
Dec 10,2013,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Dec 2]
Dec Community Recognition, Presentation of Key and Certificate—Mayor Towey (5 minutes)
1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes)
2. Proposed Resolution Amending Fee Resolution for 2014—Mark Calhoun (10 minutes)
3.Motion Consideration: Lodging Tax Allocations for 2014—Mark Calhoun (25 minutes)
4.Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 50 minutes]
Dec 17,2013, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Dec 9]
Oath of Office to Councilmembers (Positions 1, 4, 5, 7) (10 minutes)
1.Mayoral Appointments to Planning Commission(2 positions set to expire 12-31-2013) (5 minutes)
2.Mayoral Appointments to LTAC (2 positions set to expire 12-31-2013)
3.Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
Dec 24,2013 no meeting—Christmas Eve
Dec 31,2013 no meeting—New Year's Eve
January 7,2014, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Dec 30]
1. Council Officer Elections (select Mayor and Deputy Mayor)—Chris Bainbridge (10 minutes)
OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS:
Appt.,Mayoral committee appointments for 2014
ADA Transition Plan
Coal Train EIS
Economic Development(long term goals)
Future Acquisition Areas
Park& Recreation Master Plan
PEG Funds(Education)
Public Safety Contract,Proposed Amendment
Speed Limits(overall system)
Regional Transportation Issues
Townhouses in Garden Office
*time for public or Council comments not included
Draft Advance Agenda 8/8/2013 1:35:05 PM Page 3 of 3
T
!.
CITY OF PARKS AND RECREATION
• S okane � ., .
p SECOND QUARTER REPORT i E;
Ate_ (4,
Valley APRIL—JUNE 2013
ADMINISTRATION AND PARKS:
• Contracts completed in the second quarter include:
o WM Smith—Painted the Terrace View pool tank.
o Marketing Solutions—Marketing and advertising services for CenterPlace.
o SPVV—Design of the ADA walkway leading from Discovery Playground out to the two new
adjacent shelters.
o Bacon Concrete—Construction of the ADA walkway at the Discovery Playground shelters.
o Red Rock Catering– Continued contract for food services at CenterPlace for another year.
o Pool World—Installed an ADA Lift in the swimming pool at Terrace View.
o Allwest Testing & Engineering—Performed field services and testing for lead and asbestos on
the city-owned former Ray Brown residence property adjacent to Greenacres Park. This
parcel will be developed in the future as part of the Phase II/Master Plan for the park when
funding is available.
o Phalon Abatement Services—Performed the asbestos removal of materials found at the former
Brown residence.
o Larson's Demolition, Inc.—Performed the demolition of the former Brown residence, which
included removal and disposal of all materials, debris, and remaining landscaping.
• Ongoing projects staff is working on:
0 Appleway Trail—Participating with Public Works on the planning and development of the
proposed trail, including hosting the second open house at CenterPlace in May.
0 Park/Library Conceptual Site Plan Project–Working with Bernardo Wills Architects, Spokane
County Library District, and related Steering Committee, including co-hosting a public meeting
and an open house, both held at the current library.
0 Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update—Working with Studio Cascade on the draft plan,
now that the surveys and public meetings have been held.
o Sullivan Bridge Project—Continuing various meetings regarding impacts and improvements of
the park as a result of the bridge project.
• Additional projects being worked on this quarter:
o CenterPlace Acoustical Panel Installation Project– Installation panels in the Great Room for
better sound absorption during meetings and events.
o Precinct Office Addition–Addition constructed to facilitate increasing staff, installing interior
walls, suspended ceiling and insulation plus minor electrical and HVAC work.
• Hired Teresa Dickinson as our Park Ambassador for the summer months. This position has proven to
be invaluable as a direct liaison with the citizens and for solving numerous problems that arise.
• Coordinated with Andy Buddington, an instructor in the Science Dept. at Spokane Community
College, to study the geology of Mirabeau Point Park. This undergraduate service-learning research
project was developed to create earth science awareness and educational opportunities for the
general public that utilize the park. Field studies and interpretations will allow for the development of
informational displays, a guided walking tour, and potential lesson plans for K-12 field trips.
1
CENTERPLACE: I
• Staff took 223 CenterPlace reservations the -•• K
first quarter of this year for events in 2013 °` - ' . 11
and 2014. We have 626 events on the books �'
which is down slightly, about 35% over `-J ' ' ` ":
second quarter last year. Worship services are .
down as some have leased their own facility - r i „,
and are no longer meeting here; however, we . v: +- - ,�
have had two more churches inquire so that !
number should improve next quarter. —
• Carol Carter, our Customer Relations & Facility Coordinator, attended the Venue
Management School through the International Association of Venue Managers. It is the
premier school for venue management and consists of one week of intensive instruction and
is considered to be the benchmark in the industry for this education.
• Carol also attended the Washington Recreation and Park Association yearly conference in
Vancouver, WA. The conference was filled with training information that all of the Parks and
Recreation staff will benefit from.
• Staff attended the Tourism Awards banquet hosted by Visit Spokane at the Red Lion Inn at
the Park. Carol Carter, our Customer Relations and Facility Coordinator was one of three
finalists nominated for Best First Impression for a Business Meeting.
• We have been looking at ways to increase sales, such as additional sales training
opportunities, sending thank you cards to customers who utilize the facility, and letting
groups book further in advance to secure dates.
• Staff has also been updating processes to ensure events operate more smoothly on evenings
and weekends by developing individual roles for host staff by having the front desk staff be
more involved in customer meetings.
• We are now offering themed Birthday Party Packages in '4 -• t I
a private party room decorated in the theme of choice: '`` .
princess, pirate, or luau. The packages include party
favors, themed craft, place settings and party host. A
Food service is also available. i„J' p
,i,r
- '` , 1 ;:
E ,
*-4” 4 IIII".* '' " tll /144
,04 1AR
I n . ilia '", tit „--_� F ''� . ,�_��
WEID_ .,t,i.. NtE,:.)id_ ,-‘'"&_z-,___ :7:-. ''. 40 1 I A -- t
2
RECREATION AND AQUATICS: "
• Staff attended the Washington Recreation and Park Association (WRPA) annual
conference in Vancouver, WA.
r
• Multiple interviews were conducted for the summer staff. Jennifer Papich, our
Recreation Coordinator hired and trained 11 Recreation Assistants, including • ;
positions for Summer Day Camp, Park Programs, and the Recreation Intern.
1 di4
• The Counselor in Training Program began again with 13 youth (aged 12-16 years)
participating. The teens learn all aspects of working with children in a Day Camp
setting, including leadership, communication, planning, safety and fun, of course. T4i-4
• Registering online for recreation programs has proven to be popular and 1
continues to grow. There were 261 transactions for $25,914 compared to _&,
171 transactions for $16,530 in 2012. �,.M„we
• Staff participated in the Greater Spokane Valley Healthy Communities I t -4 - .- It
Network Resource Fair, "Get Connected,” held at the HUB in May. This
community event was free for all ages, abilities, and socioeconomic statuses. '
There were dozens of community vendors promoting health, wellness, ..p._ .
recreation, fitness, education, financial support, resources, and more. .
•
• Summer Day Camp began on June 17. There were 110 happy campers ,•
participating in the first two weeks of camp, compared to 95 in 2012. And
the great thing about our camp is no one gets homesick or has to write I\ .4
letters to their parents back at home. e `
-
• New this season are tumbling classes held at CenterPlace conducted jointly ,
with the Spokane Valley YMCA. Don't get too excited about becoming the 4.. - , Silo."
next Olympic gymnast, as these Baby Bugs, Tumble Bugs, and Jitter Bugs
classes are for cuties aged 1.5-7 yrs. • -,
"-- ,le
• The free Summer Park Program also began on June 17 at Greenacres,
Terrace View, and Valley Mission. Our enthusiastic summer Parks and
Recreation staff lead games, arts, crafts, and other fun activities in the morning. it.
• The pools opened on June 15. The amount of June open swim visits were down *-
-
from last year, but the swim lesson registrations went up to 420 from 350 last
�� l
year. Swim team registrations stayed steady at 102. ,,'
• Something new this year we are offering is the convenience of purchasing f
goggles, swim diapers, and ear plugs at the pools. During the first two weeks,
we sold 25 pairs of goggles, 7 swim diapers, and 3 sets of ear plugs. _ ; *'
i
V-1717."-"• lim- ' .; i I., ,; ..,' ' -,_,_ i,•.. . - [ ..,;,t .,10---, 0, 9
1, . . *4. c..,, E . 41 .1" -'' .:111 . • tii',..• .f:- i 4i) —
'� �/ l+l+ p NI
.. ? Vim e =fir . ..
3
SENIOR CENTER:
r„,,
ilk.
• The Spokane Humane Society asked the Senior Association to help them
collect favorite old recipes, to put together a cookbook to raise funds for
-' A I
the Humane Society. The response from the seniors was impressive. ,�=
.
• Chiropractor, Dr. Brian Wickstrom, presented a program on proper lifting, " r
twisting, and good posture
• The Bereavement Group through Hospice of Spokane continues to attract
more participants every Thursday. We are pleased to be able to provide
a space for this gathering and fellowship time.
• AWC health screenings were held in the Wellness Center of the Senior
Center for city employees and dependents. 1
• The Mother's Day Style Show presented by Cancer Care Discovery Shop ! , ° ,4 v
and Red Rock Catering attracted 80 attendees. t‘ilr i. -
,r11•'
• Our Senior Center Specialist, Karen Clark-Parson, attended a "Managing
Conflict Effectively"workshop. The Associate Director of the Center for
Community Action and Service Learning at Gonzaga University was the
presenter. At the core of the presentation is the belief that all people
are capable of working together despite differences.
• The Wednesday dance in June was sponsored by Assisted Transitions, 1'
i
a company that helps seniors with housing choices and challenges. F
The dance with new leadership and different music has increased in �,
popularity with 130 attendees for the month. More retirement and ' -` •
assisted living communities are bringing their residents to enjoy the ; ' . --i -•music. And dare we say, we had an Elvis sighting? 'bra-.. i‘,, ,,t,.-4L
• Pickleball, which is held i.
.
at the HUB, continues to
= 4' r _7. grow and can now be played
on Wednesday and Sundays evenings. Seniors play for $2,
4 ."\ L -4 x all others for $4. There were 600 players in April, which
41,
surpassed the billiards room count of 463. Not to be
outdone by the competition though, billiards racked them up
r .r and hit back with 532 visits in May, while Pickleball took
` a` second place with 514 visits. They remain the most popular
•
I - — activities, with Bingo in third place.
• Attendance counts were: April (3,468); May (3,513); and June
(approx. 3,000). These totals do not include the walk-ins we have "--- '
_Y
each day. Participation typically begins the decline in June for the _ �
summer months with the nicer weather and families travelling. =� ;� w
• New member counts were: April (22); May (21); and June (13). — _. t
4
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: August 13, 2013 Department Director Approval
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ® executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: EXECUTIVE SESSION: Potential Acquisition of Real Estate; and Review
Performance of a Public Employee [RCW 42.30.110(1)(b) and(g)]
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
[RCW 42.30.110(1)(b)]
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND:
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: "I Move that Council adjourn into executive session
for approximately forty-five minutes to discuss acquisition of real estate, and to review the
performance of a public employee; and that no action will be taken upon return to open session."
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT:
ATTACHMENTS: