The URL can be used to link to this page

2013, 09-24 Regular Meeting AGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING FORMAL FORMAT MEETING Tuesday, September 24,2013 6:00 p.m. Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers 11707 E Sprague Avenue Council Requests Please Silence Your Cell Phones During Council Meeting CALL TO ORDER: INVOCATION: Pastor Sid Johnson, Spokane Valley Baptist Church PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: ROLL CALL: APPROVAL OF AGENDA: INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: September Community Recognition, Presentation of Key and Certificate—Mayor Towey COMMITTEE,BOARD,LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS: MAYOR'S REPORT: PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those on this agenda as action items. (Action items include public hearings, and those items under NEW BUSINESS. Public Comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.)When you come to the podium, please state your name and address for the record and limit remarks to three minutes. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2014 Proposed Budget—Mark Calhoun 2. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. a.Approval of the following claim vouchers: VOUCHER LIST VOUCHER NUMBERS TOTAL AMOUNT 09/06/2013 30194-30218 $96,751.60 09/12/2013 5665-5675 $1,111.00 09/12/2013 30219-30245 $415,683.34 09/13/2013 30246-30271 $25,110.67 09/16/2013 4503-4507; 30272 $64,477.05 GRAND TOTAL $603,133.06 b.Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending September 15,2013: $284,833.49 c.Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of September 17,2013, Study Session Format NEW BUSINESS: 3.First Reading Proposed Property Tax Ordinance 13-014—Mark Calhoun [public comment] 4.Motion Consideration: Funding Allocation to Outside Agencies—Mark Calhoun [public comment] Council Agenda 09-24-13 Formal Format Meeting Page 1 of 2 PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those on this agenda as action items. (Action items include public hearings, and those items under NEW BUSINESS. Public Comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.)When you come to the podium, please state your name and address for the record and limit remarks to three minutes. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: 5. Budget Amendment for 2013—Mark Calhoun 6. CDBG(Community Development Block Grant)Potential Projects—Scott Kuhta 7.Horizon 2040—Eric Guth, Steve Worley 8.Advance Agenda—Mayor Towey INFORMATION ONLY(will not be reported or discussed): 9. Department Reports 10. Planning Commission Minutes of August 8,2013 11. Wood Burning Ban CITY MANAGER COMMENTS 12.EXECUTIVE SESSION: [RCW 42.30.110(1)(b), and RCW 42.30.110(1)i)] Potential acquisition of real estate; and potential litigation. ADJOURNMENT General Meetini Schedule(meeting schedule is always subject to change) Regular Council meetings are generally held every Tuesday beginning at 6:00 p.m. The Formal meeting formats are generally held the 2nd and 4th Tuesdays. Formal meeting have time allocated for general public comments as well as comments after each action item. The Study Session formats(the less formal meeting)are generally held the 1st,3rd and 5th Tuesdays. Study Session formats DO NOT have time allocated for general public comments; but if action items are included, comments are permitted after those specific action items.NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical,hearing, or other impairments,please contact the City Clerk at (509)921-1000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made. Council Agenda 09-24-13 Formal Format Meeting Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 24, 2013 Department Director Approval: X Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business © public hearing ❑ information ❑admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing #2 on 2014 Budget. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: State budget law. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: No formal Council action has been taken on the 2014 Budget. BACKGROUND: This marks the fifth occasion where the Council will discuss the 2014 Budget and by the time the Council is scheduled to adopt the 2014 Budget on October 22, 2013, you will have had an opportunity to discuss it on seven separate occasions, including two public hearings to gather input from citizens: • June 18 Council Budget Retreat • August 13 Admin report: Estimated 2014 revenues and expenditures • August 27 Public hearing #1 on 2014 revenues and expenditures • September 17 City Manager's presentation of preliminary 2014 Budget • September 24 Public hearing #2 on 2014 Budget • October 8 First reading on ordinance adopting the 2014 Budget • October 22 Second reading on ordinance adopting the 2014 Budget This evenings meeting represents the second public hearing on the 2014 Budget and the purpose of the hearing is to consider input from the public on estimated revenues and appropriations / expenditures. 2014 Budget Overview: • The 2014 Budget currently includes appropriations of$70,204,691 including $20,685,561 in capital expenditures, comprised in-part of: o $14,389,790 in Fund #303 Street Capital Projects. o $262,500 in Fund #309 Park Capital Projects. o $3,595,521 in pavement preservation including $888,823 financed by the General Fund. o $1,166,000 in Fund #402 Stormwater Management projects. o $1,120,000 in Fund #403 Aquifer Protection Area projects. o $90,000 in Fund #501 Equipment Rental and Replacement for the acquisition of three half-ton pick-ups. • Budgets will be adopted across 20 separate funds. • The full time equivalent employee (FTE) count will increase by 2.0 employees from 85.25 in 2013 to 87.25 in 2014. The two additional employee include: o A 1.0 FTE help desk technician in the Finance Department. Cost of this position is budgeted at $64,996 which will be offset by reductions of $74,800 in professional services costs. 1 o A 1.0 FTE planning grants engineer in the Public Works Department. Cost of this position is budgeted at $100,010 allocated: • 37.5% to the General Fund #001 at a cost of $37,467, which is offset by a $40,000 reduction the professional services budget. • 37.5% to the Street Fund #101 at a cost of$37,467, which is offset by a $40,000 reduction in the professional services budget. • 25% to the Stormwater Management Fund #402 at a cost of$25,076. Pertaining Specifically to the General Fund: • The 2014 recurring revenue estimate of $36,823,500 is $1,548,800 or 4.39% greater than the 2013 budget of$35,274,700. • The 2014 recurring expenditure proposal of $36,823,010 is $1,510,336 or 4.28% greater than the 2013 appropriation of$35,312,674. • The increase of$1,510,336 is comprised of: o $1,245,443 that is public safety related (reflecting a 5.63% increase over 2013), and o $264,893 that is non-public safety related (reflecting a 2.01% increase over 2013) • Recurring revenues currently exceed recurring expenditures by $490. • Nonrecurring expenditures total $586,650 and include: o a $192,500 transfer to Fund #309 — Park Capital Projects. o $350,000 for a law enforcement contingency o $8,800 for AutoCAD licenses for the Public Works Department o $11,350 for replacement chairs at CenterPlace. o $24,000 for a variety of improvements at the police precinct. • The total of 2014 recurring and nonrecurring expenditures exceeds total revenues by $586,160 - and this is entirely a result of the one-time/nonrecurring expenditures. • The projected General Fund fund balance at the end of 2014 is currently $20,149,703 or 54.72% of recurring revenues. Our goal is to maintain an ending fund balance of at least 50%. 2 Other Funds: 2014 Budget appropriations (expenditures) in the other funds total $32,795,031 as follows: Fund Fund 2014 Number Name Appropriation 101 Street Fund 4,688,216 103 Paths and Trails Fund 0 105 Hotel / Motel Tax Fund 577,000 120 CenterPlace Operating Reserve Fund 0 121 Service Level Stabilization Reserve Fund 0 122 Winter Weather Reserve Fund 0 123 Civic Facilities Replacement Fund 616,284 204 Debt Service Fund 627,823 301 REET 1 Capital Projects Fund Capital Projects Fund 546,199 302 REET 2 Capital Projects Fund Special Capital Projects Fund 562,720 303 Street Capital Projects Fund 14,389,790 309 Parks Capital Projects Fund 262,500 310 Civic Facilities Capital Projects Fund 0 311 Pavement Preservation Fund 3,595,521 312 Capital Reserve Fund 2,570,000 402 Stormwater Management Fund 2,823,978 403 Aquifer Protection Area Fund 1,120,000 501 Equipment Rental and Replacement Fund 90,000 502 Risk Management Fund 325,000 32,795,031 Noteworthy here is that we are proposing to: • Change the name of Fund #301 from Capital Projects Fund to REET 1 Capital Projects Fund, and • Change the name of Fund #302 from Special Capital Projects Fund to REET 2 Capital Projects Fund Primary sources of revenues in these other funds include: • Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax revenue that is collected by the State and remitted to the Street Fund is anticipated to be $1,858,600. • Telephone Tax revenues remitted to the City that supports Street Fund operations and maintenance are anticipated to be $2,750,000. • Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) revenues that are in large part used to match grant financed street projects are anticipated to total $1,200,000. • Hotel / Motel Tax revenues that are dedicated to the promotion of visitors and tourism are anticipated to be $490,000. • Stormwater Management Fees that are estimated at $1,835,000. • Aquifer Protection Area Fees are estimated at $500,000. • Grant Revenues are estimated at $14,726,269: o Fund #303 —Street Capital Projects - $11,092,997 o Fund #311 — Pavement Preservation - $2,763,272 o Fund #403 —Aquifer Protection Area - $870,000 3 OPTIONS: State law requires a public hearing on 2014 estimated revenues and expenditures. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: As the purpose of the public hearing is to gather input from the public in regard to the 2014 Budget, no action is requested at this time. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Given that the budget will not be adopted by the Council until October 22, 2013, it is possible the figures may be modified as we refine estimates of revenues and expenditures. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: • Power Point presentation. • Assorted 2014 Budget information: o Pages 1-13 Budget summary information with detail by fund. o Pages 14-16 General Fund departmental category changes from 2013 to 2014. o Page 17 Full-time equivalent employees (FTEs). o Page 18 13-year history of CPI and Social Security increases. o Page 19 CPI change by month —2011 through 2013 4 \\SV-F52\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2014\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint presentations\2013 09 24\budget summary as of 2013 09 24 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/17/2013 2014 Budget 2013 2014 Difference Between As Amended As Proposed _ 2013 and 2014 May 28 Amendment Amended Budget $ I %Q I#001 -GENERAL FUND (RECURRING ACTIVITY I Revenues Property Tax 10,943,700 0 10,943,700 11,049,400 105,700 0.97% Sales Tax 15,250,000 0 15,250,000 16,390,000 1,140,000 7.48% Sales Tax-Criminal Justice 1,280,000 0 1,280,000 1,330,000 50,000 3.91% Sales Tax-Public Safety 750,000 0 750,000 745,000 (5,000) (0.67%) Gambling Tax and Leasehold Excise Tax 612,500 0 612,500 619,400 6,900 1.13% Franchise Fees/Business Registration 1,135,000 0 1,135,000 1,213,000 78,000 6.87% State Shared Revenues 1,684,600 0 1,684,600 1,886,500 201,900 11.99% Fines and Forfeitures/Public Safety 1,632,300 0 1,632,300 1,470,800 (161,500) (9.89%) Community Development 1,174,000 0 1,174,000 1,255,400 81,400 6.93% Recreation Program Revenues 571,500 0 571,500 579,800 8,300 1.45% Miscellaneous Department Revenue 0 0 0 85,500 85,500 #DIV/0! Miscellaneous&Investment Interest 158,000 0 158,000 115,600 (42,400) (26.84%) Transfers in-#101 (street admit?) 39,700 0 39,700 39,700 0 0.00% Transfers in-#105(him tax-CP advertising) 30,000 0 30,000 30,000 0 0.00% Transfers in-#402(storm admit?) 13,400 0 13,400 13,400 0 0.00% Total Recurring Revenues 35,274,700 0 35,274,700 36,823,500 1,548,800 4.39% Expenditures City Council 390,111 0 390,111 414,950 24,839 6.37% City Manager 637,984 0 637,984 660,843 22,859 3.58% Legal 439,161 35,000 474,161 448,922 (25,239) (5.32%) Public Safety 22,139,200 0 22,139,200 23,384,643 1,245,443 5.63% Deputy City Manager 609,706 0 609,706 653,215 43,509 7.14% Finance/IT 1,089,633 0 1,089,633 1,180,659 91,026 8.35% Human Resources 232,469 0 232,469 237,883 5,414 2,33% Public Works 876,443 0 876,443 882,694 6,251 0.71% Community Development-Administration 257,175 12,750 269,925 290,883 20,958 7.76% Community Development-Engineering 850,845 14,750 865,595 807,114 (58,481) (6.76%) Community Development-Planning 899,743 12,750 912,493 928,906 16,413 1.80% Community Development-Building 1,162,582 12,750 1,175,332 1,267,656 92,324 7.86% Parks&Rec-Administration 270,717 0 270,717 274,743 4,026 1.49% Parks&Rec-Maintenance 789,000 0 789,000 796,200 7,200 0.91% Parks&Rec-Recreation 231,321 0 231,321 229,152 (2,169) (0.94%) Parks&Rec-Aquatics 485,600 0 485,600 490,400 4,800 0.99% Parks&Rec-Senior Center 88,143 0 88,143 89,882 1,739 1,97% Parks&Rec-CenterPlace 800,884 0 800,884 828,842 27,958 3.49% Pavement Preservation 855,857 0 855,857 888,823 32,966 3.85% General Government 1,799,100 0 1,799,100 1,741,600 (57,500) (3.20%) Transfers out-#502(insurance premium) 319,000 0 319,000 325,000 6,000 1.88% Total Recurring Expenditures 35,224,674 88,000 35,312,674 36,823,010 1,510,336 4.28% Recurring Revenues Over(Under) Recurring Expenditures 50.026 (88,000) (37,974) 490 Page 1 of 19 `\5V-F52\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2014\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint presentations\2013 09 24\budget summary as of 2013 09 24 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/17/2013 2014 Budget 2013 2014 Difference Between As Amended As Proposed 2013 and 2014 May 28 Amendment Amended Budget $ I °lo #001 -GENERAL FUND-continued NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Transfers in-#120(excess reserves) 50,787 0 50,787 0 (50,787) (100.00%) Total Nonrecurring Revenues 50,787 0 50,787 0 (50,787) (100.00%) Expenditures Transfers out-#309(park grant match) 50,000 0 50,000 192,500 142,500 285.00% Law Enforcement Contingency 0 0 0 350,000 350,000 4DIVl0! Public Works(autocad licenses) 0 0 0 8,800 8,800 4D1V/01 Parks&Recreation(CP chairs) 0 0 0 11,350 11,350 #DIV/01 Public Safety(precinct improvements) 0 0 24,000 24,000 #DIV/01 Transfers out-#312(Capital Reserve Fund) 7,826,207 0 7,826,207 0 (7,826,207) (10000%) Parks&Recreation related 56,962 0 56,962 0 (56,962) (100.00%) Carpet at City Hall 25,000 0 25,000 0 (25,000) (100.00%) Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 7,958,169 0 7,958,169 586,650 (7,371,519) (92.63% Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (7,907,382) 0 (7,907,382) (586,650) Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues Over(Under)Total Expenditures (7,857,356) (88,000) (7,945,356) (586,160) Beginning unrestricted fund balance 28,681,219 28,681,219 20,735,863 Ending unrestricted fund balance 20,823,863 20,735,863 20,149,703 Fund balance as a percent of recurring expenditures I 59.12% 58.72% 54.72% Page 2 of 19 \\SV-FS2\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2014\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint presentations\2013 09 24\budget summary as of 2013 09 24 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/17/2013 2014 Budget 2013 2014 Difference Between As Amended As Proposed 2013 and 2014 May 28 Amendment Amended Budget . $ ! % SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS #101 -STREET FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Motor Vehicle Fuel(Gas)Tax 1,861,100 0 1,861,100 1,858,600 (2,500) (0,13%) Investment Interest 5,000 0 5,000 3,000 (2,000) (40.00%) Utility Tax 2,900,000 0 2,900,000 2,750,000 (150,000) (5.17%) Total Recurring Revenues 4,766,100 0 4,766,100 4,611,600 (154,5 00) (3.24%) Expenditures Wages/Benefits I Payroll Taxes 573,170 0 573,170 627,288 54,118 9.44% Supplies 72,200 0 72,200 91,500 19,300 26.73% Services&Charges 2,456,152 0 2,456,152 2,167,201 (288,951) (11.76%) Snow Operations 469,000 0 469,000 520,000 51,000 10.87% Intergovernmental Payments 851,000 0 851,000 798,000 (53,000) (6.23%) Transfers out-#001 39,700 0 39,700 39,700 0 0.00% Transfers out-#311 (pavement presentation) 282,000 0 282,000 282,000 0 0.00% Transfers out-#501 (plow replace.) 150,000 0 150,000 75,000 (75,000) (50.00%) Transfers out-#501 (non-plow vehicle rental) 10,777 0 10,777 10,777 0 0.00% Total Recurring Expenditures 4,903,999 0 4,903,999 4,611,466 (292,533) (5.97%) Recurring Revenues Over(Under) Recurring Expenditures (137,899) 0 (137,899) 134 NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Grants 0 200,000 200,000 0 (200,000) (100.00%) Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/01 Total Nonrecurring Revenues 0 200,000 200,000 0_ (2.00,000) (100.00%) Expenditures 133 Sprague/Sullivan ITS-phase 2 0 200,000 200,000 0 (200,000) (100.00%) Patch trailer 0 0 0 30,000 30,000 #DIVIO! Hawk Signal 0 0 0 25,000 25,000 #DIV/0! Software 0 0 0 6,750 6,750 #DIV/0! Transfers out-#501 (new pickup) 0 0 0 15,000 15,000 #DIV/0! Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 0 200,000 200,000 76,750 (123,250) (61.63%) Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures 0 0 0 (76,750) Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues Over(Under)Total Expenditures (137,899) 0 (137,899) (76,616) Beginning fund balance 2,228,437 2,228,437 2,090,538 Ending fund balance 2,090,538 2,090,538 2,013,522 Page 3 of 19 \\SV-FS2\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2014\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint presentations\2013 09 24\budget summary as of 2013 09 24 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 1 9/17/2013 2014 Budget 2013 2014 Difference Between As Amended As Proposed 2013 and 2014 _ May 28 Amendment Amended Budget $ SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS-continued #103-PATHS&TRAILS Revenues Motor Vehicle Fuel(Gas)Tax 7,800 0 7,800 7,800 0 0.00% Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/01 Total revenues 7,800 0 7,800 7,800 0 0.00% Expenditures Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV101 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV101 Revenues over(under)expenditures 7,800 7,800 7,800 Beginning fund balance 63,941 63,941 71,741 Ending fund balance 71,741 71,741 79,541 #105-HOTEL 1 MOTEL TAX FUND Revenues Hotel/Motel Tax 460,000 30,000 490,000 490,000 0 0.00% Investment Interest 500 0 500 300 (200) (40.00%) Total revenues 460,500 30,000 490,500 490,300 (200) (0,04%) Expenditures Transfers out-#001 30,000 0 30,000 30,000 0 0.00% City directed marketing efforts 55,000 0 55,000 0 (55,000) (100.00%) Tourism Promotion-contracted 425,500 0 425,500 0 (425,500) (100.00%) Tourism Promotion 0 0 0 547,000 547,000 #DIV101 Total expenditures 510,500 0 510,500 577,000 66,500 13.03% Revenues over(under)expenditures (50,000) (20,000) (86,700) Beginning fund balance 206,772 206,772 186,772 Ending fund balance 156,772 186,772 100,072 Page 4 of 19 \\SV-F521,Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2014\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint presentations\2013 09 24\budget summary as of 2013 09 24 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/17/2013 2014 Budget _ 2013 2014 Difference Between As Amended As , Proposed 2013 and 2014 May 28 Amendment Amended Budget $ [PECIAL REVENUE FUNDS-continued #120-CENTER PLACE OPERATING RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Total revenues 0 0 0 _ 0 0 #DIV/01 Expenditures Operations 50,787 0 50,787 0 (50,787) (100.00%) Total expenditures 50,787 0 50,787 0 (50,787) (100.00%) Revenues over(under)expenditures (50,787) (50,787) 0 Beginning fund balance 350,787 350,787 300,000 Ending fund balance 300,000 300,000 300,000 #121 -SERVICE LEVEL STABILIZATION RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 7,000 0 7,000 7,300 300 4.29% Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Total revenues 7,000 0 7,000 7,300 300 4.29% Expenditures Operations 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Revenues over(under)expenditures 7,000 7,000 7,300 Beginning fund balance 5,441,531 5,441,531 5,448,531 Ending fund balance 5,448,531 5,448,531 5,455,831 #122-WINTER WEATHER RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 700 0 700 700 0 0,00% Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/O! Subtotal revenues 700 0 700 700 0 0.00% Expenditures Reserve for Winter Weather 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/01 Revenues over(under)expenditures 700 700 700 Beginning fund balance 502,888 502,888 503,588 Ending fund balance 503,588 503,588 504,288 #123-CIVIC FACILITIES REPLACEMENT FUND Revenues Investment Interest 1,600 0 1,600 1,700 100 6.25% Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Total revenues 1,600 0 1,600 1,700 100 6.25% Expenditures Caplet Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Transfers out-#311 (pavement preservation) 616,284 0 616,284 616,284 0 0.00% Total expenditures 616,284 0 616,284 616,284 0 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures (614,684) (614,684) (614,584) Beginning fund balance 2,403,947 2,403,947 1,789,263 Ending fund balance 1,789,263 1,789,263 1,174,679 Page 5 of 19 \\SV-FS2\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2014\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint presentations\2013 09 24\budget summary as of 2013 09 24 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 1 9/17/2013 2014 Budget 2013 2014 Difference Between As Amended' As Proposed 2013 and 2014 May 28 Amendment Amended Budget . $ P DEBT SERVICE FUNDS #204-DEBT SERVICE FUND Revenues Spokane Public Facilities District 437,120 0 437,120 441,520 4,400 1.01% Transfers in-#301 92,951 0 92,951 93,152 201 0.22% Transfers in-#302 92,952 0 92,952 93,151 199 0.21% Total revenues 623,023 0 623,023 627,823 4,800 0.77% Expenditures Debt Service Payments-CenterPlace 437,120 0 437,120 441,520 4,400 1.01% Debt Service Payments Roads 185,903 0 185,903 186,303 400 0,22% Total expenditures 623,023 0 623,023 627,823 4,800 0.77% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 0 Beginning fund balance 0 0 0 Ending fund balance 0 0 0 Page 6 of 19 \\SV-FS2\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2014\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint presentations\2013 09 24\budget summary as of 2013 09 24 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/17/2013 2014 Budget 2013 2014 Difference Between As Amended As Proposed 2013 and 2014 May 28 Amendment Amended Budget $ CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS #301 -REET 1 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues REET 1 -Taxes 500,000 0 500,000 600,000 100,000 20.00% Investment Interest 500 0 500 1,000 500 100.00% Total revenues 500,500 0 500,500 601,000 100,500 20.08% Expenditures Transfers out-#204 92,951 0 92,951 93,152 201 0,22% Transfers out-#303 892,404 0 892,404 268,575 (623,829) (69.90%) Transfers out-#311 (pavement preservation) 1 50,000 0 150,000 184,472 34,472 22.98% Total expenditures 1,135,355 0 1,135,355 546,199 (589,156) (51.89%) Revenues over(under)expenditures (634,855) (634,855) 54,801 Beginning fund balance 1,092,264 1,092,264 457,409 Ending fund balance 457,409 457,409 512,210 #302-REET 2 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues REET 2-Taxes 500,000 0 500,000 600,000 100,000 20.00% Investment Interest 1,000 0 1,000 1,000 0 0.00% Total revenues 501,000 0 501,000 601,000 100,000 19.96% Expenditures Transfers out-#204 92,952 0 92,952 93,151 199 0,21% Transfers out-#303 617,479 0 617,479 285,097 (332,382) (53,83%) Transfers out-#311 (pavement preservation) 150,000 0 150,000 184,472 34,472 22,98% Total expenditures 860,431 0 860,431 562,720 (297,711) (34.60%) Revenues over(under)expenditures (359,431) (359,431) 38,280 Beginning fund balance 1,130,670 1,130,670 771,239 Ending fund balance 771,239 771,239 809,519 Page 7 of 19 \\SV-FS2\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2014\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint presentations\2013 09 24\budget summary as of 2013 09 24 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/17/2013 2014 Budget 2013 2014 Difference Between As Amended As Proposed 2013 and 2014 May 28 Amendment Amended Budget , $ I CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued #303-STREET CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 6,597,842 0 6,597,842 11,092,997 4,495,155 68.13% Developer 0 0 0 166,020 166,020 #DIV/0! Transfers in-#301 892,404 0 892,404 268,575 (623,829) (69.90%) Transfers in-#302 617,479 0 617,479 285,097 (332,382) (53.83%) Transfers in-#312-Appleway Landscaping 0 18,000 18,000 250,000 232,000 1288.89% Transfers in-#312-Sullivan Rd W Bridge 0 0 0 2,320,000 2,320,000 #DIV/0! Transfers in-#402 0 0 0 7,101 7,101 #DIV/01 Total revenues 8,107,725 18,000 8,125,725 14,389,790 6,264,065 77.09% Expenditures 005 Pines/Mansfield,Wilbur Rd.to Pines 300,000 0 300,000 0 (300,000) (100.00%) 060 Argonne Rd Corridor Upgrade SRTC 957,892 0 957,892 860,280 (97,612) (10.19%) 061 Pines(SR27)ITS Imporvements 637,288 0 637,288 10,000 (627,288) (98.43%) 115 Sprague Ave Resurfacing-Evergreen to Sullivan 188,745 0 188,745 0 (188,745) (100.00%) 123 Mission Ave.-Flora to Barker 0 127,500 127,500 382,410 254,910 199.93% 141 Sullivan&Euclid PCC(PE&RW) 139,332 0 139,332 123,090 (16,242) (11.66%) 142 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan PCC int,(PE/RW) 219,599 0 219,599 50,000 (169,599) (77.23%) 145 Spokane Valley-Millwood Trail 200,000 0 200,000 100,000 (100,000) (50.00%) 146 24th Ave Sidewalk-Adams to Sullivan 15,000 0 15,000 0 (15,000) (100.00%) 149 Sidewalk Infill 337,507 0 337,507 364,425 26,918 7.98% 154 Sidewalk&Tansit Stop Accessibility 33,198 0 33,198 0 (33,198) (100.00%) 155 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement 800,000 0 800,000 8,888,189 8,088,189 1011.02% 156 Mansfield Ave.Connection 1,012,924 0 1,012,924 1,158,727 145,803 14.39% 159 University Rd/1-90 Overpass Study 125,000 0 125,000 50,000 (75,000) (60.00%) 166 Pines Rd(SR27)&Grace Ave. Intersect Safety 98,100 0 98,100 538,850 440,750 449.29% 167 Citywide Safety Improvements(bike/ped) 450,995 0 450,995 341,928 (109,067) (24.18%) 168 Wellesley Ave&Adams Rd Sidewalk 554,500 0 554,500 30,000 (524,500) (94.59%) 169 Argonne/Mullan Corridor Safety-Indiana to Broads 104,460 0 104,460 0 (104,460) (100.00%) 170 Argonne Road-Empire to Knox Corridor Safety 172,785 0 172,785 0 (172,785) (100.00%) 171 Sprague Ave ADA Sdwlk Improve(Havana-Fanct 110,400 0 110,400 0 (110,400) (100.00%) 176 Appleway Trail Design 150,000 0 150,000 0 (150,000) (100.00%) 177 Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 0.00% 181 Citywide Traffic Sign Upgrade 0 150,000 150,000 50,000 (100,000) (66.67%) 185 Appleway Landscaping-Phase 1 0 18,000 18,000 250,000 232,000 1288.89% XX){ITS Infill Project Phase 1 (PE START 2014) 0 0 0 91,891 91,891 #DIV/Ot Contingency 1,500,000 (377,500) 1,122,500 1,000,000 (122,500) (10.91%) Total expenditures 8,107,725 18,000 8,125,725 14,389,790 6,264,065 77.09% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 0 Beginning fund balance 177,918 177,918 177,918 Ending fund balance 177,918 177,918 177,918 Page 8 of 19 \\SV-FS2\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2014\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint presentations\2013 09 24\budget summary as of 2013 09 24 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/17/2013 2014 Budget 2013 2014 Difference Between As Amended As Proposed 2013 and 2014 , May 28 Amendment Amended Budget $ CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued #309-PARKS CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Transfers in-#001 50,000 0 50,000 192,500 142,500 285.00% Investment Interest 0 0 0 500 500 #DIV/Ol Total revenues 50,000 0 50,000 193,000 143,000 286.00% Expenditures Capital 50,000 0 50,000 0 (50,000) (100.00%) Sand volleyball courts(4)at Brown's Park 0 0 0 40,000 40,000 #DIV/0! Edgecliff picnic shelter 0 0 0 65,000 65,000 #DIV/0! Discovery Playground equipment 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 #DIV/0! Shade structure at Discovery Playground 0 0 0 15,000 15,000 #D1VI0! City entry sign 0 0 0 70,000 70,000 #DIV/O! Park signs(3) 0 0 0 22,500 22,500 #DIV/O! Total expenditures 50,000 0 50,000 262,500 212,500 425.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 (69,500) Beginning fund balance 302,423 302,423 302,423 Ending fund balance 302,423 302,423 232,923 #310-CIVIC FACILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Investment Interest 0 0 0 1,900 1,900 #DIV/0! Total revenues 0 0 0 1,900 1,900 #DIV/0l Expenditures Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Capital 0 0 0 0 0 4DIV/0! Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 4DIV/0! Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 1,900 Beginning fund balance 1,110,074 1,110,074 1,110,074 Ending fund balance 1,110,074 1,110,074 1,111,974 #311 -PAVEMENT PRESERVATION Revenues Transfers in-#101 282,000 0 282,000 282,000 0 0,00% Transfers in-#123 616,284 0 616,284 616,284 0 0.00% Transfers in-#301 150,000 0 150,000 184,472 34,472 22.98% Transfers in-#302 150,000 0 150,000 184,472 34,472 22.98% Transfers in-#001 0 0 0 888,823 888,823 4DIV/01 Grants 0 165,793 165,793 2,763,272 2,597,479 1566.70% Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0 4DIV/0! Total revenues 1,198,284 165,793 1,364,077 4,919,323 3,555,246 260.63% Expenditures Pavement preservation 1,198,284 850,172 2,048,456 3,595,521 1,547,065 75.52% Total expenditures 1,198,284 850,172 2,048,456 3,595,521 1,547,065 75.52% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 (684,379) 1,323,802 Beginning fund balance 948,733 948,733 264,354 Ending fund balance 948,733 264,354 1,588,156 Page 9 of 19 \\5V-F52\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2014\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint presentations\2013 09 24\budget summary as of 2013 09 24 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9117/2013 2014 Budget 2013 2014 Difference Between As Amended As Proposed 2013 and 2014 May 28 Amendment Amended Budget _ $ I [CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued #312-CAPITAL RESERVE FUND Revenues Transfers in-#001 7,826,207 0 7,826,207 0 (7,826,207) (100.00%) Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Total revenues 7,826,207 0 7,826,207 0 (7,826,207) (100.00%) Expenditures Capital Outlays 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/01 Business Route Signage 60,000 0 60,000 0 (60,000) (100.00%) Balfour Park/Library site development 42,150 0 42,150 0 (42,150) (100.00%) Transfers out#303-Phase 1 -Appleway Landsc< 0 18,000 18,000 250,000 232,000 1288.89% Transfers out 4303-Sullivan Rd W Bridge 0 0 0 2,320,000 2,320,000 #DIVIO! Total expenditures 102,150 18,000 120,150 2,570,000 2,449,850 2038.99% Revenues over(under)expenditures 7,724,057 7,706,057 (2,570,000) Beginning fund balance 0 _ 0 7,706,057 Ending fund balance 7,724,057 7,706,057 5,136,057 Page 10 of 19 \\SV-FS21,Users\mcalhoun`Budgets\2014\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint presentations\2013 09 24\budget summary as of 2013 09 24 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA L9/17/2013 2014 Budget 2013 2014 Difference Between ' As Amended As Proposed 2013 and 2014 May 28 Amendment Amended Budget $ i ENTERPRISE FUNDS #402-STORMWATER FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY 1 - Revenues Stormwater Management Fees 1,800,000 0 1,800,000 1,835,000 35,000 1.94% Investment Interest 1,800 0 1,800 2,500 700 38.89% Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0? Total Recurring Revenues 1,801,800 0 1,801,800 1,837,500 35,700 1.98% Expenditures Wages/Benefits I Payroll Taxes 475,604 0 475,604 505,535 29,931 6.29% Supplies 16,300 0 16,300 15,900 (400) (2A5%) Services&Charges 1,127,120 0 1,127,120 1,065,076 (62,044) (5.50%) Intergovernmental Payments 27,000 0 27,000 26,500 (500) (1.85%) Transfers out-#001 13,400 0 13,400 13,400 0 0.00% Transfers out-#501 1,567 0 1,567 1,567 0 0.00% Total Recurring Expenditures 1,660,991 0 1,660,991 1,627,978 (33,013) (1.99%) Recurring Revenues Over(Under) Recurring Expenditures 140,809 0 140,809 209,522 NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Grant Proceeds 200,000 0 200,000 0 (200,000) (100.00%) Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Total Nonrecurring Revenues 200,000 0 200,000 0 (200,000) (100.00%) Expenditures Capital-various projects 350,000 0 350,000 900,000 550,000 157.14% Property acquisition 0 0 0 250,000 250,000 #DIV/01 VMS Trailer 0 0 0 16,000 16,000 #DIV/0! Sullivan Bridge Drain Retrofit 267,000 0 267,000 0 (267,000) (100.00%) UIC Retrofits on Pvmnt Pres Projects 430,000 0 430,000 0 (430,000) (100.00%) Transfers out-#501 (new pickup) 0 0 0 30,000 30,000 #DIV/0l Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 1,047,000 0 1,047,000 1,196,000 149,000 14.23% Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (847,000) 0 (847,000) (1,196,000) Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues Over(Under)Total Expenditures (706,191) 0 (706,191) (986,478) Beginning working capital 2,697,333 2,697,333 1,991,142 Ending working capital 1,991,142 1,991,142 1,004,664 Page 11 of 19 \\SV-F52\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2014\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint presentations\2013 09 24\budget summary as of 2013 09 24 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9117/2013 2014 Budget 2013 2014 Difference Between As Amended As Proposed 2013 and 2014 May 28 .Amendment Amended Budget $ I % ENTERPRISE FUNDS-continued #403-AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA Revenues Spokane County 500,000 0 500,000 500,000 0 0.00% Grant DOE-Decant Facility 735,000 0 735,000 0 (735,000) (100.00%) Grant DOT-Decant Facility 150,000 0 150,000 0 (150,000) (100.00%) Grant DOE-Sprague UIC Elimination 610,331 0 610,331 0 (610,331) (100.00%) Grant revenue 0 0 0 870,000 870,000 #DIV10! Investment Interest 1,000 0 1,000 0 (1,000) (100.00%) Total revenues 1,996,331 0 1,996,331 1,370,000 (626,331) (31.37%) Expenditures Sprague Swales 40,000 0 40,000 0 (40,000) (100.00%) 14th Ave Custer to Carnahan 300,000 0 300,000 0 (300,000) (100.00%) Bettman-Dickey Storm drain 250,000 0 250,000 0 (250,000) (100.00%) Decant Facility 980,000 0 980,000 0 (980,000) (100.00%) Broadway SD retrofit(design only) 0 0 0 60,000 60,000 4DIV/0? Outfall Diversion(design only) 0 0 0 60,000 60,000 4DIV/0! SE Yardley Retrofits 0 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 4DIV10! Total expenditures 1,570,000 0 1,570,000 1,120,000 (450,000) (28.66%) Revenues over(under)expenditures 426,331 426,331 250,000 Beginning working capital (108,658) (108,658) 317,673 Ending working capital 317,673 317,673 567,673 Page 12 of 19 \\5V-FS2\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2014\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint presentations\2013 09 24\budget summary as of 2013 09 24 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/17/2013 2014 Budget 2013 2014 Difference Between As Amended As Proposed 2013 and 2014 May 28 _Amendment Amended Budget $ C % (INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS #501 -ER&R FUND Revenues Transfers in-#001 15,400 0 15,400 15,400 0 0.00% Transfers in-#101 10,777 0 10,777 10,777 0 0.00% Transfers in-#101 (plow replace.) 150,000 0 150,000 75,000 (75,000) (50.00%) Transfers in-#402 1,567 0 1,567 1,567 0 0,00% Investment Interest 1,000 0 1,000 1,000 0 0.00% Transfers in-#101 (new pickup) 0 0 0 15,000 15,000 #DIV/0! Transfers in-#402(new pickup) 0 0 0 30,000 30,000 #DIV/O! Total revenues 178,744 0 178,744 148,744 (30,000) (16.78%) Expenditures Computer replacement lease 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Software/Hardware replacement 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Vehicle Replacement 50,000 0 50,000 90,000 40,000 80.00% Snow Plow Replacement 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Total expenditures 50,000 0 50,000 90,000 40,000 80.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures 128,744 128,744 58,744 Beginning working capital 1,053,177 1,053,177 1,181,921 Ending working capital 1,181,921 1,181,921 1,240,665 #502-RISK MANAGEMENT FUND Revenues Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV10! Transfers in-#001 319,000 0 319,000 325,000 6,000 1.88% Total revenues 319,000 0 319,000 325,000 6,000 1.88% Expenditures Auto&Property Insurance 319,000 0 319,000 325,000 6,000 1.88% Unemployment Claims 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/Ol Total expenditures 319,000 0 319,000 325,000 6,000 1.88% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 0 Beginning fund balance 83,212 83,212 83,212 Ending fund balance 83,212 83,212 83,212 TOTAL OF ALL FUNDS Total of Revenues for all Funds 63,871,801 413,793 64,285,594 66,957,980 Total of Expenditures for all Funds 65,988,372 1,174,172 67,162,544 70,204,691 Total grant revenues(included in total revenues) 8,293,173 365,793 8,658,966 14,726,269 Total Capital expenditures(included in total expenditures) 12,981,016 868,172 13,849,188 20,685,561 Page 13 of 19 \\SV-FS2\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2014\RCAs and intros and PowerPoint presentations\2013 09 24\budget summary as of 2013 09 24 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 2014 Budget General Fund Department Changes from 2013 to 2014 Difference Between 2014 2013 and 2014 2013 Proposed increase(Decrease) Budget Budget , $ I i City Council Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 188,868 210,658 21,790 11.54% Supplies 4,150 4,192 42 1.01% Services&Charges 197,093 200,100 3,007 1.53% Total 390,111 414,950 24,839 6.37% City Manager Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 574,080 596,300 22,220 3.87% Supplies 3,300 3,350 50 1.52% Services & Charges 60,604 61,193 589 0.97% Total 637,984 660,843 22,859 3.58% Legal Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 362,811 367,812 5,001 1.38% Supplies 2,400 2,400 0 0.00% Services & Charges 108,950 78,710 -30,240 -27.76% Total 474,161 448,922 -25,239 -5.32% Public Safety Judicial System 2,090,326 2,612,788 522,462 24.99% Law Enforcement 17,220,568 18,144,552 923,984 5.37% Jail System 1,301,540 1,501,222 199,682 15.34% Animal Control Contract 268,351 287,081 18,730 6.98% Fines & Forfeitures 1,050,264 764,500 -285,764 -27.21% Communications 208,151 0 -208,151 -100.00% Other 0 74,500 74,500 #DIV10l Total 22,139,200 23,384,643 1,245,443 5.63% Deputy City Manager Wages, Payroll Taxes& Benefits 573,870 590,025 16,155 2.82% Supplies 2,350 2,050 -300 -12.77% Services & Charges 33,486 61,140 27,654 82.58% Total 609,706 653,215 43,509 7.14% Finance/IT Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 1,055,533 1,151,059 95,526 9.05% Supplies 3,500 7,000 3,500 100.00% Services &Charges 30,600 22,600 _ -8,000 -26.14% Total 1,089,633 1,180,659 91,026 8.35% Human Resuorces Wages, Payroll Taxes& Benefits 210,161 214,905 4,744 2.26% Supplies 700 700 0 0.00% Services &Charges 21,608 22,278 670 3.10% Total 232,469 237,883 5,414 2.33% Page 14 of 19 \\SV-FS2\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2014\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint presentations\2013 09 24\budget summary as of 2013 09 24 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2014 Budget General Fund Department Changes from 2013 to 2014 Difference Between 2014 2013 and 2014 2013 Proposed Increase (Decrease) Budget , Budget $ I Public Works Wages, Payroll Taxes& Benefits 741,993 799,369 57,376 7.73% Supplies 25,500 19,500 -6,000 -23.53% Services& Charges 108,950 63,825 -45,125 -41.42% Total 876,443 882,694 6,251 0/1% Community Dev.-Admin Wages, Payroll Taxes& Benefits 227,975 232,683 4,708 2.07% Supplies 3,100 3,100 0 000% Services&Charges 38,850 55,100 16,250 41,83% Total 269,925 290,883 20,958 7.76% Community Dev.-Engineering Wages, Payroll Taxes& Benefits 764,895 709,964 -54,931 -7.18% Supplies 7,800 9,800 2,000 25.64% Services & Charges 92,900 87,350 -5,550 -5.97% Total 865,595 807,114 -58,481 -6.76% Community Dev.-Planning Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 759,293 777,356 18,063 2.38% Supplies 7,250 11,250 4,000 55.17% Services & Charges 145,950 140,300 -5,650 -3.87% Total 912,493 928,906 16,413 1.80% Community Dev.-Building Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 1,036,282 1,136,956 100,674 9.71% Supplies 34,200 28,200 -6,000 -17.54% Services &Charges 104,850 102,500 -2,350 -2.24% Total 1,175,332 1,267,656 92,324 7.86% Parks & Rec-Admin Wages, Payroll Taxes& Benefits 221,717 222,343 626 0.28% Supplies 8,300 8,450 150 1.81% Services &Charges 40,700 43,950 3,250 7.99% Total 270,717 274,743 4,026 1.49% Parks& Rec- Maintenance Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 0 0 0 #DIV10l Supplies 27,500 10,000 -17,500 -63.64% Services & Charges 761,500 786,200 24,700 3.24% Total 789,000 796,200 7,200 0.91% Parks & Rec- Recreation Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 152,321 156,702 4,381 2.88% Supplies 6,700 5,350 -1,350 -20.15% Services &Charges 72,300 67,100 -5,200 -7.19% Total 231,321 229,152 -2,169 -0.94% Page 15 of 19 \ASV-FS2\Users\mcalhoun`Budgets\2014\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint presentations\2013 09 24\budget summary as of 2013 09 24 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 2014 Budget General Fund Department Changes from 2013 to 2014 Difference Between 2014 2013 and 2014 2013 Proposed Increase (Decrease) Budget Budget $ I 1 '% Parks & Rec-Aquatics Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 0 0 0 #DIV101 Supplies 2,500 2,500 0 0.00% Services & Charges 483,100 487,900 4,800 0.99% Total 485,600 490,400 4,800 0.99% Parks & Rec-Senior Center Wages, Payroll Taxes& Benefits 77,693 81,682 3,989 5.13% Supplies 3,500 2,500 -1,000 -28.57% Services &Charges 6,950 5,700 -1,250 -17.99% Total 88,143 89,882 1,739 1.97% Parks & Rec-CenterPlace Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 410,402 420,115 9,713 2.37% Supplies 68,947 64,187 -4,760 -6.90% Services&Charges 321,535 344,540 23,005 7.15% Total 800,884 828,842 27,958 3.49% Pavement Preservation Council Designation 855,857 888,823 32,966 3.85% Total 855,857 888,823 32,966 3.85% General Government Wages, Payroll Taxes & Benefits 0 0 0 #DIVIO! Supplies 105,800 77,400 -28,400 -26.84% Services &Charges 1,693,300 1,664,200 -29,100 -1.72% Total 1,799,100 1,741,600 -57,500 -3.20% Transfers out-#502 319,000 325,000 6,000 1.88% Total recurring expenditures 35,312,674 36,823,010 1,510,336 4.28% Summary by Category Wages, Payroll Taxes& Benefits 7,357,894 7,667,929 310,035 4.21% Supplies 317,497 261,929 -55,568 -17.50% Services& Charges 4,323,226 4,294,686 -28,540 -0.66% Pavement Preservation 855,857 888,823 32,966 3.85% Transfers out-#502 319,000 325,000 6,000 1.88% Judicial System 2,090,326 2,612,788 522,462 24.99% Law Enforcement 17,220,568 18,144,552 923,984 5.37% Jail System 1,301,540 1,501,222 199,682 15.34% Animal Control Contract 268,351 287,081 18,730 6.98% Fines &Forfeitures 1,050,264 764,500 -285,764 -27.21% Communications 208,151 0 -208,151 -100.00% Other 0 74,500 74,500 #DIVIO! 35,312,674 36,823,010 1,510,336 4.28% Page 16 of 19 \\SV-FS2\Users\mealhoun\Budgets\2014\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint presentations\2013 09 24\budget summary as of 2013 09 24 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Full Time Equivalent Employees Difference from Adopted Proposed 2013 to 2014 2009 1 2010 1 2011 f 2012 1 2013 2014 +(-) #001 -General Fund City Manager/City Clerk 5 5 5 5 5 5 Legal 3 3 3 3 3 3 Deputy City Manager 8 8 7 7 6 6 Finance 10 12 11 11 10.75 11.75 1.000 (1) Human Resources 2 2 2 2 2 2 Public Works 7.5 7.5 7.5 7 7 7.375 0.375 (2) CD-Administration 3 3 3 3 2 2 CD-Engineering 8 8 6 6 8 7 (1.000) (3) CD- Planning 9 9 8.5 8.5 8 8 CD-Building 14.75 14.75 12.75 12.75 11.5 12.5 1.000 (3) Parks& Rec-Admin 2 2 2 2 2 2 Parks&Rec-Recreation 1 1 1 1 1 1 Parks& Rec Senior Cntr 1 1 1 1 1 1 Parks& Rec-CenterPlace 7 7 5 5 5 5 Total General Fund 81.25 83.25 74.75 74.25 72.25 73.625 1.375 #101 -Street Fund 5 5 4.5 5 5 5.375 0.375 (2) #303-Street Capital Project Fund 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 #402-Storm Water Fund 4 4 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.75 0.250 (2) Total FTEs 93.75 95.75 87.25 87.25 85.25 87.250 2.000 (1) Reflects the addition of a 1.0 FTE Help Desk Technician. (2) Reflects the addition of a 1.0 FTE Planning Grants Engineer. (3) Reflects the transfer of an employee from one division to another. Page 17 of 19 \\SV-FS2\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2014\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint presentations\2013 09 24\budget summary as of 2013 09 24 History of CPI as Published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics 9/17/2013 and Social Security COLAs for the years 2001 through 2014 July to July- U.S. City Average Year I CPI-U I CPI-W Social Security CPI Increase: For calendar year 2014 2013 For calendar year 2013 1.7 2012 1.4 1.3 For calendar year 2012 3.6 2011 3.6 4,1 For calendar year 2011 0.0 2010 1.2 1,6 For calendar year 2010 0.0 2009 -2.1 -2.7 For calendar year 2009 5.8 2008 5.6 6.2 For calendar year 2008 2.3 2007 2.4 2.3 For calendar year 2007 3.3 2006 4.1 4.3 For calendar year 2006 4.1 2005 3.2 3.3 For calendar year 2005 2.7 2004 3.0 3.0 For calendar year 2004 2,1 2003 2.1 2.0 For calendar year 2003 1.4 2002 1.5 1.3 For calendar year 2002 2.6 2001 2.7 2.6 For calendar year 2001 3.5 average 2.3917 2.4417 average 2.5462 According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics CPI-U =All Urban Consumers The CPI-U measures consumer inflation for all U.S. residents of urban areas, which accounts for about 87%of the U.S. population. CPI-W= Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers The CPI-W measures consumer price inflation for a subset of the CPI-U population: residents of ubran areas who live in households that: receive more than half of their income from clerical or wage occupations, and have one earner employed for at least 37 weeks during the previous 12 months. The CPI-W covers about 32 percent of the U.S. population. The CPI-U is the most commonly used index because it has the broadest population coverage. However, the CPI-W is used sometimes to make cost-of-living adjustments for labor contracts. **Social security increase for 2013 is based upon the change in the CPI-W, comparing September 2012 to September 2011. Page 18 of 19 \\SV-FS2\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2014\RCAs and Intros and PowerPoint presentations\2013 09 24\budget summary as of 2013 09 24 CPI as Published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics 9/17/2013 Comparing Change from 2010 to 2013 U.S. City Average I CPI-U I CPI-1N January 2010 to January 2011 1.6 1.8 February 2010 to February 2011 2.1 2.3 March 2010 to March 2011 2.7 3.0 April 2010 to April 2011 3.2 3.6 May 2010 to May 2011 3.6 4.1 June 2010 to June 2011 3.6 4.1 July 2010 to July 2011 3.6 4.1 August 2010 to August 2011 3.8 4.3 September 2010 to September 2011 3.9 4.4 October 2010 to October 2011 3.5 3.9 November 2010 to November 2011 3.4 3.8 December 2010 to December 2011 3,0 3.2 January 2011 to January 2012 2.9 3.1 February 2011 to February 2012 2.9 3.1 March 2011 to March 2012 2.7 2.9 April 2011 to April 2012 2.3 2.4 May 2011 to May 2012 1.7 1.6 June 2011 to June 2012 1.7 1.6 July 2011 to July 2012 1.4 1.3 August 2011 to August 2012 1.7 1.7 September 2011 to September 2012 2.0 2.0 October 2011 to October 2012 2.2 2.2 November 2011 to November 2012 1.8 1.7 December 2011 to December 2012 1.7 1.7 January 2012 to January 2013 1.6 1.5 February 2012 to February 2013 2.0 1.9 March 2012 to March 2013 1.5 1.3 April 2012 to April 2013 1.1 0.9 May 2012 to May 2013 1.4 1.2 June 2012 to June 2013 1.8 1.8 July 2012 to July 2013 2.0 2.0 August 2012 to August 2013 1.5 1.5 September 2012 to September 2013 October 2012 to October 2013 November 2012 to November 2013 December 2012 to December 2013 Page 19 of 19 City of Spokane Valley 2014 Budget Public Hearing #2 2014 Estimated Revenues and Expenditures September 24, 2013 1 2014 Budget Summary All Funds Total appropriations across all City Funds of $70.2 million including : $37.4 million in the General Fund which is comprised of $36.8 million recurring and $586,650 nonrecurring. $32.8 million spread across 19 additional funds. Including $20.7 million in capital expenditures. FTE count will increase by 2.0 employees from 85.25 in 2013 to 87.25 in 2014. 2 General Fund REVENUES: • Total recurring 2014 revenues of $36, 823, 500 as compared to $35,274,700 in 2013 for an increase of $ 1 , 548, 800 or 4. 39% . 2 largest sources are Sales Tax and Property Tax which are collectively estimated to account for $29, 514,400 or 80% of 2014 General Fund revenues. General Fund General sales tax collections are estimated at $ 16, 390, 000, an increase of $ 1 , 140, 000 or 7. 5% over the 2013 Budget. Property Tax levy is not proposed to include the 1 % increase authorized by State law. 2014 Levy is estimated at $11 ,049,400 Levy assumes we start with the 2013 levy of $10,899,437 + estimated new construction of $150,000. General Fund EXPENDITURES: • 2014 recurring expenditure proposal of $36, 823, 010 as compared to $35, 312 ,674 in 2013 for an increase of $ 1 , 510, 336 or 4.28% . The increase is comprised of: $1 ,245,443 that is public safety related (reflecting a 5.63% increase over 2013). $264,893 that is non-public safety related (reflecting a 2.01 % increase over 2013). General Fund Recurring revenues currently exceed recurring expenditures by $490. Nonrecurring expenditures total $586,650 and include: a $192,500 transfer to Fund #309 — Park Capital Projects $350,000 for a law enforcement contingency $8,800 for AutoCAD licenses for Public Works $11 ,350 for replacement chairs at CenterPlace $24,000 for improvements at the police precinct General Fund The total of 2014 recurring and nonrecurring expenditures exceeds total revenues by $586, 160. Projected fund balance at the end of 2014 is currently $20, 149,703 or 54.72% of recurring expenditures. Other Funds Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax revenue that is collected by the State and remitted to the Street Fund is anticipated to be $ 1 , 858,600. Telephone Taxes that are remitted to the City and support Street Fund operations and maintenance are anticipated to be $2 ,750, 000. Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) revenues that are in large part used to match grant financed street projects are anticipated to total $ 1 ,200, 000. Other Funds Hotel/Motel Tax revenues that are dedicated to the promotion of visitors and tourism are anticipated to be $490, 000. Stormwater Management Fees of $ 1 , 835, 000. Aquifer Protection Area fees of $500, 000. Grant revenues of $ 14,726,269. Fund #303-Street Capital Projects - $11 ,092,997 Fund #311 -Pavement Preservation - $2,763,000 Fund #403-Aquifer Protection Area - $870,000 9 Future Council Budget Discussions h Oct. 8 — First reading of ordinance adopting 2014 Budget. • Oct. 22 — Second reading of ordinance adopting 2014 Budget. 10 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 24, 2013 Department Director Approval: Ei Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Following Vouchers: VOUCHER LIST VOUCHER NUMBERS TOTAL AMOUNT 09/06/2013 30194-30218 $96,751.60 09/12/2013 5665-5675 $1,111.00 09/12/2013 30219-30245 $415,683.34 09/13/2013 30246-30271 $25,110.67 09/16/2013 4503-4507; 30272 $64,477.05 GRAND TOTAL $603,133.06 Explanation of Fund Numbers found on Voucher Lists #001 -General Fund Other Funds 001.011.000.511 City Council 101 —Street Fund 001.013.000.513. City Manager 103 —Paths&Trails 001.013.015.515. Legal 105 —Hotel/Motel Tax 001.016.000. Public Safety 120—CenterPlace Operating Reserve 001.018.013.513. Deputy City Manager 121 —Service Level Stabilization Reserve 001.018.014.514. Finance 122—Winter Weather Reserve 001.018.016.518. Human Resources 123 —Civic Facilities Replacement 001.032.000. Public Works 204--Debt Service 001.058.050.558. Comm. Develop.-Administration 301 —Capital Projects (1St'/%REET) 001.058.055.558. Comm. Develop.—Develop.Eng. 302—Special Capital Proj (2"d'/n% REET) 001.058.056.558. Community Develop.- Planning 303 —Street Capital Projects 001.058.057.558. Community Develop.- Building 304—Mirabeau Point Project 001.076.000.576. Parks &Rec—Administration 307—Capital Grants 001.076.300.576. Parks &Rec-Maintenance 309—Parks Capital Grants 001.076.301.571. Parks&Rec-Recreation 310--Civic Bldg Capital Projects 001.076.302.576. Parks& Rec- Aquatics 311 —Pavement Preservation 001.076.304.575. Parks &Rec- Senior Center 312—Capital Reserve 001.076.305.571. Parks & Rec-CenterPlace 402—Stormwater Management 001.090.000.511. General Gov't- Council related 403 —Aquifer Protection Area 001.090.000.514. General Gov't-Finance related 501 —Equipment Rental &Replacement 001.090.000.517. General Gov't-Employee supply 502—Risk Management 00I.090.000.518. General Gov't-Centralized Services 001.090.000.519. General Gov't-Other Services 001.090.000.540. General Gov't-Transportation 001.090.000.550. General Gov't-Natural &Economic 001.090.000.560. General Gov't-Social Services 001.090.000.594. General Gov't-Capital Outlay 001.090.000.595. General Gov't-Pavement Preservation RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Approve claims for vouchers as listed above. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun, Finance Director; ATTACHMENTS: Voucher Lists vchlist 09/06/2013 4:41:50PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 1 Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor 30194 9/6/2013 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC 30195 9/6/2013 003300 CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 30196 9/6/2013 000670 CITY OF CHENEY 30197 9/6/2013 001169 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY 30198 9/6/2013 000326 CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION#19 30199 9/6/2013 000795 EARTHWORKS RECYCLING INC. 30200 9/6/2013 002308 FINKE,MELISSA 30201 9/6/2013 001750 FIRST TRANSIT INC 30202 9/6/2013 000321 GREATER SPOKANE INC 30203 9/6/2013 000410 GRIFFIN PUBLISHING INC. 30204 9/6/2013 001635 ISS FACILITY/EVENT SERVICES Invoice 9464361 9466403 S0061449 July 2013 8/29/2013 August 2013 September 2013 August 2013 31874 August 2013 September 2013 10853984 92724 16695 641135 Fund/Dept 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.301.571 001.076.305.575 402.402.000.531 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.301.571 001.076.301.571 001.076.301.571 001.076.305.575 001.076.301.571 001.076.305.575 Description/Account LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT C LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLYAT C LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLYAT C Total : SUPPLIES:CP Total : SUMMER SWIM FOR SPOKANE VA Total : PETTY CASH: PARKS:8976,77, 78 PETTY CASH:9384,85,86,87,9392,! Total : UTILITIES: PARKS Total : RECYCLING COLLECTION:CP Total : INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT Total : SUMMER DAYCAMP FIELD TRIP TF Total : MEMBERSHIP BREAKFAST EXHIBI" Total : 2013 FALLIWINTER GUIDES DELIV Total : AUGUST 2013 MONTHLY CLEANINI Total : Amount 277.41 43.93 113.44 434.78 180.71 180.71 57.00 57.00 26.07 82.22 108.29 866.94 866.94 35.00 35.00 78.00 756.60 834.60 3,301.00 3,301.00 50.00 50.00 2,119.31 2,119.31 7,136.00 7,136.00 Page: 1 vchlist 09/06/2013 4:41:50PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 2 Bank code: apbank Voucher 30205 30206 30207 30208 30209 30210 30211 30212 30213 30214 30215 Date Vendor Invoice 9/6/2013 001944 LANCER LTD 9/6/2013 001684 MARKETING SOLUTIONS NW 9/6/2013 000132 MODERN ELECTRIC WATER CO 9/6/2013 001860 PLATT 9/6/2013 000019 PURRFECT LOGOS INC. 9/6/2013 000675 RAMAX PRINTING&AWARDS 9/6/2013 000153 ROLLER VALLEY 0439112 #CP 8/14/2013Postage #CP 8/20/13 #CP 8/21/13 August 2013 5475287 31814 31911 23926 24607 3472 9/6/2013 000709 SENSKE LAWN&TREE CARE INC. 5183139 5720410 5725205 9/6/2013 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST#3 9/6/2013 001992 SPOKANE HOTEL MOTEL ASSOC 9/6/2013 000773 STUDIO CASCADE INC. August 2013 1270 1852 Fund/Dept 001.076.000.576 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.302.576 001.076.305.575 001.076.301.571 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.301.571 001.076.300.576 001.076.300.576 001.016.000.521 001.076.300.576 001.076.305.575 001.076.099.576 Description/Account BROCHURES FOR PARKS Total : POSTAGE/MAILING:CENTERPLACI MEDIA EXPENSE:CENTERPLACE PRODUCTION/PLANNING EXPENS Total : UTILITIES: PARKS Total : SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE Total : CHANGING BANNER FOR MOVIE If SHIRTS EMBROIDERY FOR CENTE Total : NAME TAG WITH MAGNET NAME TAG WITH MAGNET Total : SUMMER DAY CAMP FIELD TRIP Total : CONTRACT MAINT: PARKS AUGUS MISC PARK REPAIRS:MIRABEAU SERVICES AT PRECINCT Total : WATER CHARGES: PARK ROAD PC Total : 2013 SECOND QTR MEETING FEE: Total: PLANNING SUPPORT SERVICES Amount 804.38 804.38 3,276.38 5,977.82 3,580.00 12,834.20 5,631.24 5,631.24 570.69 570.69 15.76 255.45 271.21 36.85 41.74 78.59 252.00 252.00 57,48294 597.85 386.81 58,467.60 406.87 406.87 17.00 17.00 596.50 Page: 2 vchlist 09/06/2013 4:41:50PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 3 Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor 30215 9/6/2013 000773 000773 STUDIO CASCADE INC. Invoice (Continued) 30216 9/6/2013 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 0890884-2681-3 1890885-2681-0 30217 9/6/2013 000413 WEST COAST CASH REGISTER 67528 67554 67588 30218 9/6/2013 001409 WORLD CLASS COMMUNICATIONS 130811173101 25 Vouchers for bank code: apbank 25 Vouchers in this report I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Mayor Date Council Member Date Fund/Dept 001.076.305.575 001.016.000.521 001.076.302.576 001.076.302.576 001.076.302.576 001.076.305.575 Description/Account Total : WASTE MGMT:CENTERPLACE WASTE MGMT: PRECINCT Total : CASH REGISTER SERVICE AND RE CASH REGISTER SERVICE AND RE CASH REGISTER SERVICE AND RE Total : ANSWERING SVC FOR CENTERPL Total : Bank total : Total vouchers : Amount 596.50 746.49 284.00 1,030.49 451.11 104.35 71.74 627.20 40.00 40.00 96,751,60 96,751.60 Page: 3 vchlist 09/12/2013 9:15:39AM Voucher List Page: 1 Spokane Valley Bank code : pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 5665 9/12/2013 003504 CATALDO CATHLIC SCHOOL PARKS REFUND 001.237.10,99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT: MIRABEAU ME 52.00 Total: 52.00 5666 9/12/2013 003156 FRUCCI, MIKE PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT: BROWNS PARI 52,00 Total : 52.00 5667 9/12/2013 003503 INLAND EMPIRE BASS CLUB PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT: MIRABEAU ME 52.00 Total : 52.00 5668 9/12/2013 003507 JULIANO, PAM PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 CANCELED CLASS TUNE TALES RI 70.00 Total : 70.00 5669 9/12/2013 003505 LINDSAY, GLENDA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT:VALLEY MISSI( 52.00 Total : 52.00 5670 9/12/2013 003502 MCKANNA, COLLEEN PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT: FIRESIDE LOU 210.00 Total : 210.00 5671 9/12/2013 002205 STATE PROTECTION SERVICES,ATTN: E PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT:VALLEY MISSI( 52.00 Total : 52.00 5672 9/12/2013 003506 TAYLOR,AMANDA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT:VALLEY MISSI( 52.00 Total : 52.00 5673 9/12/2013 003501 THOMPSON, HOLLY PARKS REFUND 001.237,10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT:SMALL DINING 52.00 Total : 52.00 5674 9/12/2013 003142 WESTERN DANCE ASSOCIATION PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT:SULLIVAN PAR 257.00 Total : 257.00 5675 9/12/2013 002459 WORLD WIDE DREAMBUILDERS PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT:GREAT ROOM 210.00 Total : 21 0.00 11 Vouchers for bank code: pk-ref Bank total : 1,111.00 11 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 1,111.00 Page: 1 vchlist 0911212013 1:06:05PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 1 Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 30219 9/12/2013 003496 ARGONNE 2000 LIMITED, PARTNERSHIF 45074.0139 30220 9/12/2013 002655 AZTECH ELECTRIC INC 30221 9/12/2013 000571 CODE PUBLISHING CO 30222 9/12/2013 000508 CONOCOPHILLIPS FLEET PAY APP 5 PAY APP 5 44474 34071982 30223 9/12/2013 003256 DISCOVERY BENEFITS INC, HRA PLAN 0000408215-IN 30224 9/12/2013 003509 DK GRAPHICS&PRINTER SUPPLIES 2981 30225 9/12/2013 003393 ENTERPRISE RENTA CAR 30226 9/12/2013 003393 ENTERPRISE RENT A CAR 30227 9/12/2013 003261 FEHR&PEERS 30228 9/12/2013 003500 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES D830216 MAY 2013 D830217 MAY 2013 D830691 JUNE 2013 D832752 JUNE 2013 D832754 JULY 2013 D832756 JULY 2013 D832767 JUNE 2013 D832768 JULY 2013 88535 Fund/Dept 303.303.060.595 303303.061.595 101.042.133.595 001.013.000.513 001.058.057.558 001.018.016.518 001.032.000.543 303.303.061.595 311.000.174.595 402.402.000.531 311,000.174.595 303.000.175.595 402.402.000.531 303.303.061.595 303.303.061.595 303.303.159.595 786957 001.076.305.575 Description/Account Amount PORTION OF PARCEL PURCHASE Total 0061 -PINES ITS CONSTRUCTION SPRAGUE/SULLIVAN ITS PROJECT MUNICIPAL CODE UPDATE Total : Total : AUGUST 201,3: FLEET FUEL BILL Total : AUGUST 2013 HRA SERVICE FEE Total : SUPPLIES: PW Total : RENTAL CAR FOR PUBLIC WORKS RENTAL CAR FOR PUBLIC WORKS Total : RENTAL CAR FOR PUBLIC WORKS RENTAL CAR FOR PUBLIC WORKS RENTAL CAR FOR PUBLIC WORKS RENTAL CAR FOR PUBLIC WORKS RENTAL CAR FOR PUBLIC WORKS RENTAL CAR FOR PUBLIC WORKS Total : 0159-UNIVERSITY ROAD OVERPA Total : SUPPLIES:CENTERPLACE 2,250.00 2,250.00 88,982.95 730.01 89,71 2.96 320.29 320.29 3,488.08 3,488.08 369.00 369.00 69.00 69.00 616.84 587.94 1,204.78 559.68 559.68 559.68 559.68 559.68 559.68 3,358.08 10,698.13 10,698.13 32.00 Page: 1 vchlist 09/1212013 1:06:05PM Voucher List Page: 2 Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 30228 9/12/2013 003500 003500 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES (Continued) Total : 32.00 30229 9/12/2013 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 40563 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 47.60 40564 001.013,000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 25.00 Total : 72.60 30230 9/12/2013 003508 G.ARGER COMPANY REAL ESTATE, INC 2013 AUGUST 303.303.060.595 PARCEL 45074.0139 ROW PLAN#1 750.00 Total : 750.00 30231 9/12/2013 001253 GORDON THOMAS HONEYWELL JUL 13 1042 001.011,000.511 LOBBYIST SERVICES 3,292.92 Total : 3,292.92 30232 9/12/2013 002043 HDR ENGINEERING INC 00096368-B 303.000.177.595 0177-FURURE TRAFFIC ANALYST: 15,444.08 Total : 15,444.08 30233 9/12/2013 003364 L.E.E.D. 09041302 001.016.000.521 AMMUNITION FOR SVPD 812.00 Total : 812.00 30234 9/1212013 003497 LARRY GUTHRIE ESTATE, C/O SUSAN G FIRE FEE REFUND 001.229.45.00 SHP-2013-0004 PLAT FEE CHARGE 160.00 Total : 160.00 30235 9/12/2013 000239 NORTHWEST BUSINESS STAMP INC. 90549 001.018.016.518 SLOTTED NAME BADGE 16.85 Total : 16.85 30236 9/12/2013 000193 NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC SEPTEMBER 2013 001.090.000.518 CITY HALL RENT 33,333.33 Total : 33,333.33 30237 9/12/2013 002925 ORRICK, HERRINGTON&SUTCLIFFE 1433494-43637 001.013.015.515 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,445.00 Total : 1,445.00 30238 9/12/2013 000318 SHAMROCK PAVING INC PAY APP 7 303.223.40.00 RETAINAGE RELEASE FOR CIP 01E 75,232.14 Total : 75,232.14 30239 9/12/2013 000172 SPOKANE CO ENGINEER VLY 1307 101,042.000.542 JULY COUNTY SERVICES 43,076.83 Total : 43,076.83 30240 9/12/2013 000090 SPOKANE CO INFO SYSTEMS 50310268 402.402.000.531 COUNTY IT SUPPORT 11,737.72 Total : 11,737.72 Page: 2 vchlist 09/12/2013 1:06:05PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 3 Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 30241 9/12/2013 003499 SPOKANE CO SHERIFF COMMUNITY,Of CONFERENCE 2013 30242 9/12/2013 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 30243 9/12/2013 000618 WA DEPT OF FISH&WILDLIFE 30244 9/12/2013 000100 WABO INC. 30245 9/12/2013 000487 YMCA OF THE INLAND NW 27 Vouchers for bank code: apbank 27 Vouchers in this report I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Mayor Date Council Member Date 3208724116 3208724118 HPA PROCESSING FEE 27155 SEPTEMBER 2013 Fund/Dept 001.011.000.511 001.018.013.513 001.018.013.513 402.402.150.595 001.018.016.518 001.076.302.576 Description/Account Amount CRIME PREVENTION CONFERENA SUPPLIES:ADMIN SUPPLIES:ADMIN 10.00 Total : 10.00 56.42 109.13 Total : 165.55 SULLIVAN BRIDGE DRAIN 0150 PR 150.00 Total : 150.00 JOB POSTING ON THE WABO WEE 50.00 Total : 50.00 OPERATING EXPENSES:WAGES C 118,432.00 Total : 118,432.00 Bank total : 415,683.34 Total vouchers : 415,683.34 Page: 3 vchlist 09/13/2013 1:03:40PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 1 Bank code: Voucher 30246 30247 30248 30249 30250 30251 30252 30253 30254 30255 30256 30257 apbank Date Vendor Invoice 9/13/2013 001081 ALSCO 9/13/2013 000334 ARGUS JANITORIAL LLC 9/13/2013 003172 BROADCAST MUSIC INC 9/13/2013 000619 COSTCO MEMBERSHIP 9/13/2013 003498 CRESCENT MACHINE WORKS INC 9/13/2013 003083 DEBOISE, BRITTANI 9/13/2013 000246 EAST SPOKANE WATER DIST#1 9/13/2013 000441 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 9/13/2013 001944 LANCER LTD 9/13/2013 001684 MARKETING SOLUTIONS NW 9/13/2013 000008 NORLIFT 9/13/2013 001860 PLATT LSPO1353141 LS P01359245 LSPO1365222 009199 24012284 111810668149 A 58915 Expenses August 2013 August 2013 0439362 CP 9/5/13 55023823 5637647 Fund/Dept 001.016.000.521 001.016.000.521 001.016.000.521 001.016,000.521 001.076.300.576 001.090.000.518 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 101.042.000.542 001.076.305,575 001.076.000.576 001.076.305.575 001.076.305575 001.076.305.575 Description/Account FLOOR MATS: PRECINCT FLOOR MATS FOR PRECINCT FLOOR MATS FOR PRECINCT Total : PRECINCT JANITORIAL SERVICES Total : LICENSE FOR ACCT 2323021 Total : ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL: Total : SERVICE ON DISHWASHER AT CP Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : WATER CHARGES: PW Total : SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE Total : FLYERS FOR CENTERPLACE-PRI Total : ADVERTISING FOR CENTERPLACE Total : SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE Total : SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE Amount 20.39 20.39 20.39 61.17 2,386.87 2,386.87 783.00 783.00 110.00 110.00 749.27 749.27 23.73 23.73 1,410,72 1,410.72 102.10 102.10 139.14 139.14 5,619.49 5,619.49 42.35 42.35 6.92 Page: 1 vchlist 09/13/2013 1:03:40PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 2 Bank code: Voucher 30257 30258 30259 30260 30261 30262 30263 30264 30265 30266 30267 30268 30269 apbank Date Vendor Invoice 911312013 001860 001860 PLATT 9/13/2013 000119 PLESE PRINTING 9/13/2013 002633 PRORIDER 9/13/2013 000019 PURRFECT LOGOS INC. 9/13/2013 002580 S&S DESIGN 9/13/2013 000323 SPOKANE CO UTILITIES 9/13/2013 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST#3 (Continued) 1330053904 25461 31982 32421 September 2013 August 2013 9/13/2013 000404 SPOKANE VALLEY HERITAGE MUSEUM September 2013 9/13/2013 001083 STANDARD PLBG HEATING CONTROLS 51118 9/13/2013 001472 TESTAMERICA LABORATORIES 9/13/2013 001911 THE GLOVER MANSION 9/13/2013 000098 WA CITIES INSURANCE AUTHORITY 9/13/2013 000140 WALT'S MAILING SERVICE 59007814 CP755 101009 38238 38238B Fund/Dept 001.076.302.576 001.090.000.518 001.076.000.576 001.076.305.575 001,076.302.576 Description/Account Amount Total : SWIMMING LESSON REGISTRATIC Total : BIKE HELMETS FOR SCOPE PROG Total : BANNER FOR OPEN HOUSE Total : CHAIR COVERS FOR CENTERPLA( Total : SPOKANE CO SEWER CHRGS:SEI Total: 101.042.000.542 WATER CHARGES: PW 001.090.000.550 001.016.000.521 Total : OUTSIDE AGENCY ECON DEV GR� Total : AUG 2013 MONTHLY MAINT: PREC Total : 001.076.300.576 TC/PA ANALYSIS:PARKS 001.076.305.575 001.058.050.558 312.000.178.594 312.000.178.594 Total : EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLAi Total : NOTARY BOND: D. HORTON Total: PARKS/LIBRARY PC(DROP#3) PARKS/LIBRARY PC-POSTAGE Total : 6.92 270.59 270.59 2,915.33 2,915.33 110.33 110.33 385.00 385.00 1,473.94 1,473.94 1,765.59 1,765.59 64.10 64.10 570.68 570.68 27.00 27.00 186.27 186.27 50.00 50.00 978.18 1,470.37 2,448.55 Page: 2 vchlist 09/13/2013 1:03:40 PM Voucher List Page: 3 Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 30270 9/13/2013 000487 YMCA OF THE INLAND NW 30271 9/13/2013 002640 ZEUTSCHEL EXCAVATING 26 Vouchers for bank code: apbank 26 Vouchers in this report I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Mayor Date Council Member Date August 2013 Pay App 2-Final Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 001.076.301.571 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 142.81 Total : 142.81 310.000.164.594 WEST ENTRY SIGN AND ENTRY IM 3265.72 Total : 3,265.72 Bank total : 25,110.67 Total vouchers: 25,110.67 Page: 3 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 09/16/2013 4:45:08PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 4503 9/20/2013 000048 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS,401A PLAN Ben51212 001.231.14.00 401A:Payment 27,067.44 Total: 27,067.44 4504 9/20/2013 000682 EFTPS Ben51214 001231.11.00 FEDERAL TAXES, Payment 30,906.74 Total: 30,906.74 4506 9/20/2013 000145 VANTAGEPOINTTRANSFERAGENTS,457 PL./ Ben51216 001.231.18.00 457 DEFERRED COMPENSATION; Payr 5,343.97 Total: 5,343.97 4507 9/20/2013 000162 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS,401A EXEC PL Ben51218 001.231.14.00 401 EXEC PLAN:Payment 1,083.90 Total: 1,083.90 30272 9/20/2013 001896 DANIEL Ii BRUNNER Ben51210 001.231.20.00 BONDURANT 1203245:Payment 75.00 Total: 75.00 5 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 64,477.05 5 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 64,477.05 I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 09-24-2013 Department Director Approval : ❑ Item: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Payroll for Period Ending September 15, 2013 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: OPTIONS: Budget/Financial impacts: Employees Council Total Gross: $ 241,900.58 $ - $241,900.58 Benefits: $ 42,932.91 $ - $ 42,932.91 Total payroll $ 284,833.49 $ - $284,833.49 RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Approve Payroll STAFF CONTACT: Raba Nimri DRAFT MINUTES SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STUDY SESSION FORMAT Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers Spokane Valley,Washington September 17,2013 6:00 p.m. Attendance: Councilmembers Staff Tom Towey,Mayor Mike Jackson, City Manager Gary Schimmels,Deputy Mayor Cary Driskell, City Attorney Dean Grafos,Councilmember Mark Calhoun,Finance Director Chuck Hafner, Councilmember Mike Stone,Parks&Recreation Director Rod Higgins,Councilmember John Hohman, Community Development Dir. Ben Wick, Councilmember Eric Guth,Public Works Director Arne Woodard, Councilmember Erik Lamb,Deputy City Attorney Scott Kuhta,Planning Manager Mike Basinger, Senior Planner Christina Janssen,Planner Chris Bainbridge,City Clerk Mayor Towey called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Roll Call: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present. ACTION ITEMS: 1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. a.Approval of the following claim vouchers: VOUCHER LIST DATE VOUCHER NUMBERS; TOTAL AMOUNT 08/26/2013 30024-30075 $352,101.26 08/29/2013 39976-30104; 827130174 $136,284.57 08/29/2013 5643-5664 $2,029.00 09/03/2013 30105-30139 $118,160.65 09/04/2013 4465; 4483-4486; 4502; 30140-30143 $260,936.16 09/06/2013 30144-30193; 830130027; 905130026 $2,067,438.14 GRAND TOTAL $2,936,949.78 b.Approval of Payroll for period ending August 31,2013: $409,490.69 c.Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of August 20,2013, Study Session Format d.Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of August 27,2013,Formal Meeting Format e.Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of August 28,2013, Special Regional Solid Waste Meeting f.Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of September 3,2013, Study Session Format g.Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of September 4,2013, Special Joint Meeting h.Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of September 6,2013, Special Meeting i.Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of Sept 6,2013 Special Meeting,Council of Governments It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the consent agenda. Council Study Session: 09-17-2013 Page 1 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT 2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 13-013 Avista Natural Gas Franchise—Cary Driskell After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to approve Ordinance 13-013 granting Avista Utilities a natural gas franchise. City Attorney Driskell briefly explained the background of the franchise. Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation:In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried. NON-ACTION ITEMS: 3.Manufactured Home Park Zoning—Scott Kuhta Planning Manager Kuhta explained that tonight's agenda item is in follow-up to previous discussions concerning the issue of manufactured home park zoning regulations, wherein staff gave an overview of Tumwater's lawsuit dealing with manufactured zoning, which resulted in Council seeking more information from the park owners. Mr. Kuhta said surveys were mailed in order to get some feedback on what could be viewed as restrictive zoning on manufactured home parks; and said only five surveys were initially returned. Mr. Kuhta said staff followed up with some phone calls to the six larger parks and received a few more responses; and out of those responses, only one expressed no concern at all as the owner stated they were not going to re-develop and had no plans to do so in the future. Mr. Kuhta said that other property owners expressed some level of concern with establishing such a zone, and he referenced Mr. Cochran's comments contained in the council packet material, which explain that Mr. Cochran feels there is enough protection in the current law, and zoning would present an undue burden on private property rights and that owners of the parks would rather not see any zoning restrictions. Mr. Kuhta said if Council wants to move forward with some zoning, we would need to get something on the docket by November 1 so that policies could be added to support future regulations. Mr. Kuhta mentioned that the current regulations limit density to seven units per acre in home parks, and said he is not sure why it is so limited, and that should be researched. There followed some discussion concerning smaller lots and greater density; overlay zones for manufactured home parks; what would or would not require a comprehensive plan amendment; and the general outcome of the Tumwater decision with City Attorney Driskell urging caution since that was an ordinance specific to Tumwater's conditions. Mr. Kuhta also mentioned the recent (September 16, 2013) letter from AMHO and all Councilmembers acknowledged that they received a copy. Deputy Mayor Schimmels stated his preference not to have this as a comprehensive plan change; Councilmember Wick indicated that perhaps there could be some law changes to pursue to make it easier for an association to purchase the property. Mayor Towey said he agrees with the need for greater density, and liked the idea to move forward to at least evaluate and study the possibility of changing the density of the property rather than moving to a more restrictive park. Mr. Kuhta said a density change could be accomplished through a code text amendment. There were no objections from Council for staff to further evaluate and study the density issue. 4. Specialized School in Industrial Zones—Christina Janssen Planner Janssen explained that staff received a privately initiated code text amendment to outright allow Specialized Training/Learning Schools/Studios in the Light Industrial zone, and to allow with a conditional use permit in the Heavy Industrial zone. Ms.Janssen said a conditional use permit would have to go before the Hearing Examiner, and said the benefit would be that these types of uses could be looked at on a case- by-case basis; and said the applicant prefers allowing it as a permitted use in Light Industrial. Ms. Janssen also explained the approval criteria as noted on pages 2 and 3 of the staff report, specifically that the proposed amendment is not consistent with the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan and therefore, staff is not recommending approval of the proposal. Community Development Director Hohman said staff had a difficult time with this proposal;that they want to be business-friendly but also need to look at the guidance in the Comprehensive Plan; and said there is enough information in there for staff not to recommend approval; adding that the issue is also about sewer availability. Mr. Hohman explained that the result of a previous analysis shows there is very limited sewer availability in the industrial areas; said it would be difficult to have discussions with the County in some of these areas when we'd be entertaining that this proposal would not fit within the industrial categories; said Council Study Session: 09-17-2013 Page 2 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT staff is an advocate of sewer expansion and we want to reserve as much as possible for industrial uses. In contrast, he explained, neighboring jurisdictions have their own sewer utilities so if they want to extend sewer they can; but explained that we are not in the same category and it would be more difficult to get industrial areas open with sewer; adding that we have an obligation to try to protect existing areas. Mr. Hohman said it was very difficult for staff to make a recommendation on this, but ultimately felt there was not enough support for such a proposal in the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Hohman said that perhaps staff didn't explain that we well as it could have been explained as the Planning Commission voted five to two to recommend approval;with a minority opinion to protect those areas for the higher use.Mr. Hohman said he wants to make sure Council has the complete picture, and that the detailed minutes are included in the Council packet to help Council understand the process as it took place at the Planning Commission. Mr. Hohman said he is here to answer questions; that Council has the option to proceed with this or not, or remit back to the Planning Commission for further analysis. Councilmember Woodard referenced Spokane Valley Code section 17C.130.015 and Title 17C concerning uses permitted,but it was later determined that those code sections are from Spokane's Municipal Code and not from Spokane Valley's Code. Councilmember Woodard said he would love to see the gymnastics here and doesn't see the issue as giving up industrial land. Councilmember Grafos asked if we had more property sewered,would that have made a difference, and Mr. Hohman replied that it would but that would have only resolved that part, as there are still numerous policies in the Comprehensive Plan that discourage the use; and in response to a question from Councilmember Hafner, said if this is permitted, it would be permitted city-wide; and said again one of the issues is, would this be the highest and best use for that property. Further discussion included that the type of building needed for their business is large, and the property in question is less expensive to rent than other commercial properties. Mr. Hohman also noted that Planning Commissioner Carlson recommended a "middle ground" resolution to allow this use as a conditional use in the light industrial, and not allow it in heavy industrial, which means the Hearing Examiner could look at the specific location. The idea of a conditional use permit was discussed including mention that the process would take longer. Mr. Hohman also noted that our use matrix is very specific and staff could examine in the future that with the idea of grouping more into broader categories. Mayor Towey and Councilmember Wick suggested moving forward with the conditional use permit. Councilmember Woodard said he would like to see gymnastics as part of our lifestyle, and said he does not like the idea of a conditional use permit as it is expensive and leaves the issue up to a public hearing. Councilmember Grafos said he agreed that the conditional use permit slows down the process and he prefers moving ahead. Councilmember Wick added that he sees this as a tremendous asset and doesn't want to impede their progress, but wants to protect the manufacturing zones, and as an example said he would not like a daycare next to a manufacturing facility. Councilmember Higgins asked about the status of a previous decision to allow a soccer facility and Mr. Hohman replied that after a lot of work to modify the permitting use matrix to allow indoor entertainment in the industrial area, the business was only viable for about three months and is currently not operating. Councilmember Higgins suggested going back to the structure under which we are working and start there. City Manager Jackson asked if Councilmember Higgins was referring to examining the goals and policies of light and heavy industrial land; and Councilmember Higgins replied that he was referencing Mr. Hohman's previous statement about broadening the use matrix. Mr. Hohman replied that would be a longer term goal while he would look to Council to make a decision on this particular matter with the current use matrix. Councilmember Hafner said he prefers this return to the Planning Commission for further review. In response to Mayor Towey's question of whether to send this back to the Planning Commission for further evaluation. Councilmembers Woodard, Grafos and Higgins expressed their preference to move forward; while Mayor Towey, Deputy Mayor Schimmels, and Councilmembers Wick and Hafner expressed their preference to have this return to the Planning Commission for further evaluation. The matter will be returned to the Planning Commission for further evaluation. Council Study Session: 09-17-2013 Page 3 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT 5. Site Selector Agreement Amendment—Cary Driskell,Mike Basinger Concerning the Agreement amendment, City Attorney Driskell explained that the amendment is minor; he explained that the agreement was adopted December 12, 2006,with a new agreement executed October 19, 2009; he said the person who oversees the consortium is Dr. Kerry Brooks from the University and he has moved from Washington State University to Eastern University, so the oversight for the agreement will move with him. Mr. Basinger then explained some of the functions and features of the Site Selector, including who the primary users are and the reports available, adding that his goal is to market this to make people aware of the site, and how it can be used. Councilmember Grafos suggested we have someone from the City attend the traders' clubs and have representatives there, and have someone at the Home Builder's as well. Planning Manager Kuhta said that Mr. Basinger participates on the Consortium Oversight Committee and directly participates in all decisions; and when he (Mr. Kuhta) was on the Consortium Committee, he made several presentations to traders clubs, and held open houses for training sessions on some of the new applications and has no doubt Mr.Basinger will be involved similarly.Mr.Kuhta said that Greater Spokane, Inc is also a partner in the Consortium and one of their representatives is directly responsible for communicating with the brokers. Councilmember Grafos said he believes we should have a representative and make sure we are at the table if we're going to pay for this. Going back to the agreement, Mr. Driskell said he will make the necessary name changes on the signature pages, and if there are no objections, will bring this back for a motion on a future council agenda. There were no objections. Mayor Towey called for a short recess at 7:30 p.m., and reconvened the meeting at 7:40 p.m. 6. Presentation of 2014 Preliminary Budget—Mike Jackson As part of the 2014 budget process, City Manager Jackson presented the 2014 Preliminary Budget for council review and discussion. He explained that the second public hearing for the 2014 budget is scheduled for next week, and tonight's focus is primarily on the budget message found in the front of the budget, which includes fiscal policies for long term fmancial health of the City. Mr. Jackson stressed that our message is we have a balanced budget and are in excellent financial condition, with a surplus level equivalent to six month's reserve. Via his PowerPoint presentation, Mr. Jackson went over the fmancial objectives as shown on slide #7,including the new objective to"grow our economy so our existing tax base can support our basic programs." Mr. Jackson said we must remain fiscally sound and one way to do that is to be committed to the policies of long-term financial sustainability, and said that deviation from our commitments could begin to erode our financial condition. He said our only true debt service is Street Bonds as the CenterPlace debt is reimbursed by the Spokane Public facilities District. Examples of our lean operations,Mr. Jackson explained, include capping the 2014 budget recurring expenditures at 1% over the 2013 budget for non-wage expenditures; as well as keeping our FTE (full time equivalent staff) lean at 87.25 for 2014. Mr. Jackson said public safety is our top priority and he briefly discussed some of what it takes to meet that priority, include property tax, criminal justice tax, public safety sales tax, and general fund. Road maintenance/preservation is our second priority, said Mr. Jackson and said our pavement preservation goal commitment represents 6% of our recurring expenditures. Mr. Jackson mentioned the various funds comprising our funding pavement preservation; and in the overall taxing picture, showed that the City of Spokane Valley's share is 11%, as compared with Spokane County's 10%, Central Valley School District's 35%, Fire District #1's 23%, State Schools' 17%, and the Library District's 4%; which breaks down to about $214 a year based on a median home value of$135,000 which breaks down to about $17.84 per month. Mr. Jackson also noted our staffing levels compared to other jurisdictions, and said we remain extremely lean with a ratio of approximately one employee per 1,049 residents. Mr. Jackson mentioned our continuing financial challenges of pavement preservation, street capital projects, street maintenance, and other capital projects such as parks and trails, and mentioned a new concept as shown on slide 32, of Service Level Solvency, with ties in with the balanced budget. Mr. Jackson said he might consider funding additional preservation from the REET (real estate excise tax) fund, which is an acceptable use, which would free up dollars in the general fund to support additional officers or other essential services for the City. Councilmember Grafos asked if the $350,000 contingency for law enforcement is for future deputies,and Mr. Jackson said it is for any cost increases we might incur in 2014, and is not anticipated for additional officers. Council Study Session: 09-17-2013 Page 4 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT Mayor Towey commended staff for their work and said the budget is something we can be proud of, and again expressed appreciation for the "great job." Councilmember Grafos said with regard to Mr. Jackson's idea of using the REET funds for road preservation, and would prefer the 6% come from the general fund, and Councilmember Woodard said he also likes the concept of having the line item in the general fund so citizens can keep in mind what we're doing; and as we move forward, said he would like more discussion on police; that he would prefer we "grow ourselves" to have the revenues coming in, and would rather not see that 6% come out of the general fund. Mr. Jackson said perhaps we could do without that,but it would be a potential source if we added officers without having adequate general funds to handle that additional cost. Councilmember Grafos said he would also like to see line items on each department that shows the percentage growth of each department as well as wages and benefits. Mr. Jackson said he provided that to Council at a work session, and he would be happy to include that in the budget. Councilmember Hafner said if we determine we need more officers, he is not opposed to looking at REET funds if needed. Mr. Jackson extended his thanks to Finance Director Calhoun and to the department heads and their administrative assistants for their efforts in working on the budget. 7.Advance Agenda—Mayor Towey Councilmember Grafos asked about the City Hall options, and Mr. Jackson said that issue was moved down in priority due to other,higher priorities,but staff should be able to bring the topic back perhaps next month. Councilmember Woodard asked if the changes we requested to the County concerning the CDBG (Community Development Block Grant) are included in next week's information, and Mr. Jackson said they were approved. Mayor Towey noted there are five Tuesdays in October and he asked if there were any objections to cancelling the October 1 meeting. There were no objections. 8. Argonne Road& Sprague Avenue Street Preservation Project This was for information only and was not reported or discussed. 9. Council Check-in—Mayor Towey Mayor Towey invited all citizens to this Friday's Valleyfest parade, which starts at 7:30 p.m. between Gillis and Pines Road; and said Saturday at 7 a.m., several Councilmembers will be serving breakfast at CenterPlace. 10. City Manager Comments—Mike Jackson City Manager Jackson said he met with our legislative lobbyist Briahna Taylor in preparation for the 2014 legislative session, and said there are several issues coming up that he would like her to discuss at a council meeting,perhaps in a few weeks; said last year Council supported the legislature considering transportation revenues, and now that the Sullivan Bridge has been resolved, does Council wish to continue that message in the 2014 session; also Council may want to pursue other capital projects; said issues such as streamlining sales tax mitigation will likely continue to be prevalent; and said Council may or may not be asked to consider a position on tribal casinos. Mr. Jackson said City Attorney Driskell is working on nuisance abatement legislation but it appears the banks don't support that so it will continue to be a challenge. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 8:22 p.m. ATTEST: Thomas E.Towey,Mayor Christine Bainbridge,City Clerk Council Study Session: 09-17-2013 Page 5 of 5 Approved by Council: CETY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 24, 2013 Department Director Approval: IN Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation [' executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First reading of Ordinance #13-014 levying 2014 regular property taxes and authorizing Spokane County to collect the tax on behalf of Spokane Valley. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: State law. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Through the 2014 Budget development process there have been discussions regarding the 2014 property tax levy including a public hearing that was held on August 271h. This topic was also addressed on September 3`d through an administrative report on this single topic. BACKGROUND: 2014 Levy and Estimated Rate per$1,000 of Assessed Value • State law requires the City to pass an ordinance in order to levy property taxes. • Based upon previous discussions with the City Council staff are not proposing that the City's 2014 levy include the 1% increase allowed by State law. • The levy will include property taxes on new construction. • With the passage of this ordinance, the City would collect approximately $11,049,437.13 in 2014 which is computed as follows: 2013 Actual Levy 10,899,437.13 + 0% Increase 0.00 2014 Levy after increase 10,899,437.13 + Estimated new construction _ 150,000.00 Total estimated 2014 Levy 11,049,437.13 • The levy is based upon a July 15, 2013 preliminary estimate of assessed property values provided to the City by the Spokane County Assessor of$7,079,911,469. This figure does not yet include a number of factors that will be considered by the Assessor including exemptions, appeals, corrections or new construction which is determined by the end of July with a certification by approximately mid-September. • Total property tax revenue of $11,049,437.13 on preliminary assessed values of $7,079,911,469 will produce a levy of approximately $1.560674 per $1,000 of assessed value in 2014 ($11,049,437.131 ($7,079,911,469/1,000) = $1.560674). • It is important to note that that this estimate is based upon the Assessor's latest preliminary projections of assessed value as of 7/15/2013. A change in any of the elements including assessed value, new construction estimate and/or a change in the amount of our proposed levy will change the levy rate per $1,000. At this point we know that the "new construction" portion of the preliminary assessed values has not yet been included. Once this figure is updated I believe the estimated levy rate per$1,000 should decrease. 11SV-FS21UserslmcalhounlBudgets120141Proper ty Tax12013 09 2412013 09 24 RCA setting 2014 prop tax levy.docx Banked Capacity Banked capacity is the difference between what the City could levy and what it actually does. In the case of the City of Spokane Valley our maximum levy rate is $1.60 per $1,000 of assessed value. Any amount levied that is less than $1.60 per $1,000 of assessed value represents "banked capacity". Included in the analysis below is history of Spokane Valley levies including five years of actual figures (2009 through 2013) and a preliminary estimate for 2014: A B C D E F Maximum Banked Levy Taxable Levy Levy Rate Levy Rate Levy Rate Banked Year Value Amount per$1,000 per$1,000 per$1,000 Capacity =a44/1,000)) I (=0-C) (=E*(Arl,000)) 2013 assessment for 2014 $7,079,911,469 $11,049,437.13 $1.56067 $1.60 $0.03933 $278,424.60 2012 assessment for 2013 $6,921,825,295 $10,899,437.13 $1.57465 $1.60 $0.02535 $175,482.11 2011 assessment for 2012 $7,087,523,395 $10,818,716.56 $1.52645 $1.60 $0.07356 $521,322.78 2010 assessment for 2011 $7,140,947,644 $10,732,862.64 $1.50300 $1.60 $0.09700 $692,650.50 2009 assessment for 2010 $7,169,492,602 $10,826,707.82 $1.51011 $1.60 $0.08989 $644,480.03 2008 assessment for 2009 $7,019,508,327 $10,528,504.69 $1.49989 $1.60 $0.10011 $702,708.94 Note: Figures reflected for the 2014 levy are preliminary and subject to change. At a minimum sne know the Taxable Value figure of$7,079,911,469 wilt change because it does not yet include "new construction". • Generally speaking, you'll note there is a direct relationship between the Taxable Value listed in column A, and the Banked Capacity in columns E and F. In other words, as the Taxable Value increases the Banked Capacity also increases. • Alternatively though, there is an inverse relationship between the direction of the Taxable Value and the Levy Rate per $1,000. In other words, as the Taxable Value decreases (as it had in the weaker economy of the recent past) the Levy Rate per $1,000 increases. Essentially what occurs in this case is that even though the Levy Rate per $1,000 may increase, the actual amount paid by a property owner may not change significantly because the value of the property has decreased. By the same token, as the economy begins to improve and Taxable Values increase, the Levy Rate per$1,000 will likely decrease. • It is also noteworthy that in the years the City does not levy the 1% increase in property tax revenue that is allowed by State law, that potential increase is "banked" for potential future use. • The banked capacity can be accessed by the City through the annual property tax levy ordinance adopted by the Council. However, the City may only take the banked capacity up to a level where the levy rate per $1,000 of assessed value does not exceed $1.60. OPTIONS: Passage of this ordinance is required by law in order to levy 2014 property taxes; proceed to second reading of ordinance with or without modifications. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to advance Ordinance #13-014 levying regular property taxes for 2014, to the second reading. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: This ordinance levies property taxes for the City's 2014 Budget where we anticipate property tax revenues to be approximately $11,049,400 or 30.01% of total General Fund recurring revenues of$36,823,500. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Ordinance No. 13-014 Levying 2014 Regular Property Taxes 11SV-FS2lUsersimca lhounlBudgets120141Property Tax12013 09 2412013 09 24 RCA setting 2014 prop tax levy,docx DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 13-014 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LEVYING THE REGULAR PROPERTY TAXES FOR THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON FOR THE YEAR COMMENCING JANUARY 1, 2014 TO PROVIDE REVENUE FOR CITY SERVICES AS SET FORTH IN THE CITY BUDGET,AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley has met and considered its budget for the calendar year 2014; and WHEREAS,the City's actual levy amount from the previous year was $10,899,437.13; and WHEREAS,the population of the City is more than 10,000. NOW,THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley,do ordain as follows: Section 1. Property Tax Levy - An increase in the regular property tax levy is hereby authorized for the levy to be collected in the 2014 tax year. The dollar amount of the increase over the actual levy amount from the previous year shall be $0.00 which is a percentage increase of 0.0% from the previous year. This increase is exclusive of additional revenue resulting from new construction, improvements to property, newly constructed wind turbines, any increase in the value of state assessed property, any annexations that have occurred and refunds made. Section 2. Transmittal of Budget. A complete copy of the budget as adopted, together with a copy of this Ordinance shall be transmitted by the City Clerk to the Division of Municipal Corporations in the Office of the State Auditor,and to the Association of Washington Cities. Section 3. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phase of this Ordinance. Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after the date of publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City. PASSED by the City Council this day of ,2013. ATTEST: Mayor,Thomas E.Towey City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge Approved As To Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Item 3 Ordinance 13-014 levying 2014 prop tax Page 1 of 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 24, 2013 Department Director Approval: x Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business IX new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Council Awards of Outside Agency Funding Requests for the 2014 Budget. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: This is a component of the annual budget development process, PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: No previous action has been taken. BACKGROUND: The City has provided partial funding for local social service and economic development agencies dating back to its incorporation in 2003 and this is again up for consideration in the 2014 Budget development process where $150,000 has been set aside for this purpose. On September 31d, Council heard 5-minute presentations from those agencies requesting funding (see below), and based upon those presentations and ensuing questions individual Councilors submitted to the Finance Department their recommendations for agency funding (detail on the attached sheet). OUTSIDE AGENCY PRESENTATIONS Economic Development Agencies Social Service Agencies September 3, 2013 September 3,2013 Requested Requested 1 Greater Spokane Incorporated 50,000 a Big Brothers and Sisters of the Inland NW 7,848 2 Greater Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce 25,900 b Children's Home Society of Washington 6,000 3 Spokane Area Workforce Development Council 14,915 c Coalition of the Responsible Disabled 6,000 4 Spokane River Forum 1,500 d Greater Spokane Substance Abuse Council 10,000 5 Spokane Valley Arts Council 22,500 e Hearth Homes 15,000 6 Spokane Valley Heritage Museum 2,350 f Spokane Guilds'School Foundation 10,500 7 Valleyfest 50,000 g Spokane Valley Partners 40,000 h YWCA 9,780 $167,165 $105,128 OPTIONS: Council has the discretion to provide funding to individual agencies as it deems appropriate. Based upon Council discussion at the February 26, 2013 workshop, we will use the same methodology to make awards as was used last year. This entails the following steps: 1, Agencies interested in receiving City funds for either social service or economic development purposes will submit written application materials and make a verbal presentation to the City Council. 2. Council members will deliver to the Finance Director their recommendations for how much funding should be provided to each agency. The total of the award amounts recommended by each Councilor should equal the amount of money included in the budget. 3. The Finance Director will prepare a summary of Councilor recommendations that includes both the number of Council votes received by each agency and the average of the seven award recommendations. 4. Agencies that receive four or more Council votes will be awarded the average of the Council recommendations. 5. Agencies that receive fewer than four votes will not be considered for funding in that funding cycle. 1lSV-FS2'Users.mcalhounlBudgets1201414utside Agencies12013 09 24 RCA for Outside Agency Funding.docx 6. Any Council awards recommended to agencies that receive three or fewer Council votes will be added together and distributed evenly among those agencies that received seven Council votes. The distribution will be a simple arithmetic average of the total amount remaining to be awarded divided by the number of agencies receiving seven votes. Noteworthy here is that no agencies received fewer than four votes so steps 4 through 6 above were not employed. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to award 2014 Outside Agency funding as follows: Greater Spokane Inc. $36,714; Greater Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce $11,571; Spokane Area Workforce Development $4,186; Spokane River Forum $929; Spokane Valley Arts Council $7,857; Spokane Valley Heritage Museum $2,171; Valleyfest $24,429; Big Brothers and Sisters $2,429; Children's Home Society $3,071; Coalition of Responsible Disabled $2,143; Greater Spokane Substance Abuse Council $5,286; Hearth Homes $5,214; Spokane Guilds' School Foundation $4,286; Spokane Valley Partners $34,071; and YWCA $5,643. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: $150,000 is included in the 2014 Budget for this purpose. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun ATTACHMENTS: • Spreadsheet reflecting a summary of Councilor recommendations for outside agency funding. 11SV-FS21UserslmcathounlBudgets1201410utside Agencies12013 09 24 RCA for Outside Agency Funding.docx Average] \\SV-FS2\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2014\Outside Agencies\Council Recommended Awards for 2014 as of 2013 09 24 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 2014 Budget Summary of Outside Agency Allocations Recommended by City Council Councilor Recommendations A I B I C 1 D f E I F #of Votes Requested Economic Development Agencies 1 Greater Spokane Incorporated 45,000 30,000 35,000 30,000 16,000 41,000 60,000 7 36,714 50,000 2 Greater Spokane Valley Chamber of 10,000 10,000 5,000 8,000 7,000 15,000 26,000 7 11,571 25,900 3 Spokane Area Workforce Developmc 1,000 1,500 6,000 0 10,000 3,800 7,000 6 4,186 14,915 4 Spokane River Forum 500 1,000 1,000 0 1,000 1,500 1,500 6 929 1,500 5 Spokane Valley Arts Council 10,000 10,000 8,000 3,000 9,000 10,000 5,000 7 7,857 22,500 6 Spokane Valley Heritage Museum 2,500 2,000 3,000 1,500 2,000 2,200 2,000 7 2,171 2,350 7 Valleyfest 37,000 20,000 29,000 40,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 7 24,429 50,000 Total economic development agent 106,000 74,500 87,000 82,500 65,000 88,500 111,500 87,857 167,165 Social Service Agencies a Big Brothers and Sisters of the Inlanc 1,000 5,000 2,000 2,000 7,000 0 0 5 2,429 7,848 b Children's Home Society of Washing 1,000 5,000 0 4,000 5,000 6,000 500 6 3,071 6,000 c Coalition of the Responsible Disable' 1,000 1,000 1,000 3,000 2,000 2,000 5,000 7 2,143 6,000 d Greater Spokane Substance Abuse C 2,000 10,000 3,000 5,000 5,000 2,000 10,000 7 5,286 10,000 e Hearth Homes 1,000 10,000 2,000 5,000 10,000 7,500 1,000 7 5,214 15,000 f Spokane Guilds'School Foundation 3,000 6,000 5,000 6,500 8,000 1,500 0 6 4,286 10,500 g Spokane Valley Partners 30,000 31,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 37,500 20,000 7 34,071 40,000 h YWCA 5,000 7,500 10,000 2,000 8,000 5,000 2,000 7 5,643 9,780 Total social service agencies 44,000 75,500 63,000 67,500 85,000 61,500 38,500 Total 62,143 105,128 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 272,293 Sum of agencies receiving fewer than 4 votes 0 Less average of awards exceeding$150,000 0 Balance remaining to be allocated 0 2013 for 2014 9/16/2013 Council Approved on 9/24/2013 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Remaining $150,000 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 24, 2013 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information © admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Administrative report on Proposed 2013 Budget Amendment #2. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: In order for the City to amend an adopted budget, State law requires the Council to approve an ordinance that appropriates additional funds. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: The Council last took formal action on the 2013 Budget when it was amended on May 28th for the first time. Since then a number of events have taken place in the normal course of operations that necessitate the budget be amended. BACKGROUND: Since the initial adoption of the 2013 Budget on October 30, 2012 and the subsequent amendment on May 28, a number of events have transpired in the normal course of operations that necessitate a second 2013 Budget amendment. They include: #001 - General Fund Provide additional appropriations (expenditures) of$88,000 comprised of: • $53,000 to professional services for Community Development including: o $40,000 for Spokane County GIS services that were erroneously excluded from the budget. o $11,000 for SmartGov cloud services. o $2,000 for AutoCad services. • $35,000 for legal services for shoreline consultants #101 — Street Fund Increase revenues and expenditures each by $200,000 to cover the Sprague/Sullivan ITS Phase 2 project. Project costs are offset by a $173,000 grant covering 86.5% of expenditures with the balance being paid with real estate excise tax money. #105 - Hotel / Motel Tax Fund The revenue estimate has been revised upward from $460,000 to $490,000. #303 — Street Capital Projects Fund This fund is being amended to reflect estimated actual progress on a number of projects. Included among the projects is the addition of an $18,000 appropriation for the Appleway Landscape Design that is being financed through a transfer-in from Fund #312 — Capital Reserve Fund. #311 — Pavement Preservation Fund This fund is being amended to reflect the Public Works Department's estimate of work that will be accomplished this year. • Appropriations (expenditures) are being increased by $850,172 to a total of$2,048,456. • Revenues will increase by $165,793 reflecting partial grant financing for a portion of the projects. #312 — Capital Reserve Fund Appropriations will increase by $18,000 reflecting a transfer to Fund #303 to finance the estimated cost of the Appleway Landscape design. The second 2013 Budget amendment reflects the changes noted above and will affect 6 funds resulting in total appropriation/expenditure increases of $1,174,172 and revenue increases of $413,793. Revenue Expenditure Fund Fund Increase Increase No. Name (Decrease) (Decrease) 001 General Fund 0 88,000 101 Street Fund 200,000 200,000 105 Hotel / Motel Tax Fund 30,000 0 303 Street Capital Projects Fund 18,000 18,000 311 Pavement Preservation Fund 165,793 850,172 312 Capital Reserve Fund 0 18,000 413,793 1,174,172 OPTIONS: Future options are to accept the proposed amendments in whole or in-part. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Staff seek Council consensus to move forward with amendments to the 2013 Budget as presented. If approved we anticipate the following calendar of events leading to Council approval of the amending ordinance: • October 8, 2013 — Public hearing on 2013 Budget Amendment #2. • October 8, 2013 — First reading of Ordinance #13-xxx amending the 2013 Budget. • October 22, 2013 — Second reading of Ordinance #13-xxx amending the 2013 Budget. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: There are adequate funds available to pay for these amendments. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun ATTACHMENTS: • Fund level line-item detail of revenues and expenditures. • Budget report reflecting budget amendment impact on related funds. 11 SV-FS21Users\mcalhoun\Budgets120131Amendments\Amendment#2\2013 09 241amendment no 2 detail CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 2013 Budget-Amendment#2 Line Item Detail 9/16/2013 Account Account Initial Amended Description Number Description/Justification Budget Amendment Budget [#001 -General Fund Recurring Expenditures Legal Legal 001.013.015.515.32.41.04 - Shoreline consultants Community Development Spokane County GIS 001.058.050.558.60.41.03 Spokane County GIS Spokane County GIS Spokane County GIS 001.058.055.558.50.41.03 001.058.056.558.60.41.03 001.058.057.558.50.41.03 Nonrecurring Expenditures n/a n/a #101 -Street Fund Expenditures Capital outlay - Spok Cnty GIS-$10,000 + SmartGov Cloud Service-$2,750 - Spok Cnty GIS-$10,000 + SmartGov Cloud Service-$2,750+AutoCad upgrade-$2,000 - Spok Cnty GIS-$10,000 + SmartGov Cloud Service-52,750 - Spok Cnty GIS-$10,000 + SmartGov Cloud Service-$2,750 - n/a Total recurring expenditures Total nonrecurring expenditures Total expenditures 101.042.133.595.64.63.03 - Project#133-Sprague/Sullivan ITS Phase 2 Phase 2 carried forward from 2012 Revenues Grant Income 101.042.133.333.20.20 Transfer from -#302 101.042.133.397.30.20 Total expenditures - Proj#133 -86.5% grant financed - Proj#133 - 13.5% matched with REET Total revenues Page 1 of 3 50,150 35,000 0 12,750 0 14,750 0 12,750 0 12,750 0 88,000 0 0 88,000 85,150 12,750 14,750 12,750 12,750 0 0 200,000 200,000 200,000 0 173,000 173,000 D 27,000 27,000 200,000 9/16/2013 1 11SV-FS21Usersl mcalhounl Budgets120131AmendmentslAmendment#212013 09 24\amendment no 2 detail CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 2013 Budget-Amendment#2 Line Item Detail Account Account Initial Amended Description Number Description I Justification Budget Amendment Budget #105-Hotel!Motel Tax Fund Revenues Hotel/ Motel Tax 105.105.000.313.30.00 - revised estimate #303 -Street Capital Projects Fund Expenditures Capital outlay Capital outlay Capital outlay Capital outlay Capital outlay Total revenues 460,000 30,000 490,000 30,000 303.303.123.595.xx.xx.xx - revised est-#123 Mission-Flora to Barker 0 127,500 303.303.177.595.xx.xx.xx - revised est#177 Sullivan Rd Corridor Study 0 100,000 303.303.181.595.xx.xx.xx - revised est#181 Citywide Traffic Sign UpgradE 0 150,000 303.303.185.595.xx.xx.xx - #185 Appleway Landscaping design 0 18,000 18,000 303.303.000.595.30.63.99 - revised estimate 1,500,000 (377,500) 1,122,500 Total expenditures Revenues Transfers from -#312 303.000.185.397.xx.xx.xx - Appleway Landscaping design Total expenditures Page 2 of 3 18,000 0 18,000 18,000 18,000 \\SV-FS21Users\mcalhounlBudgets120131Amendments\Amendment#2\2013 09 24\amendment no 2 detail CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 2013 Budget-Amendment#2 Line Item Detail 9/1 6/2013 Account Account Initial Amended Description Number Description 1 Justification Budget Amendment Budget #311 -Pavement Preservation Fund Expenditures Pavement Preservation 311.000.179.595.30.63.00 Revenues Grants Revised estimate based upon updated Public Works Department projections_ Combined pavement preservation projects in 2013 total$2,904,313 including $2,048,456 in Fund#311 and$855,857 in Fund#001. Total expenditures 311.000.179.333.20.20 - 2013 Phase 2 grant financing Total revenues #312-Capital Reserve Fund 1,198,284 850,172 2,048,456 850,172 0 165,793 165,793 165,793 Expenditures Transfer to-#303 303.000.185.597.xx.xx.xx - Appleway Landscaping design 0 18,000 18,000 Total expenditures 18,000 Totals Across all Funds Total revenues Total expenditures 413,793 1,174,172 Page 3 of 3 \\SV-F52\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2013\Amendments\,Amendment 42\2013 09 24\budget report CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 2013 Budget 2013 As Amended Proposed As May 28 Amendment Amended #001-GENERAL FUND LRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Property Tax 10,943,700 0 10,943,700 Sales Tax 15,250,000 0 15,250,000 Sales Tax-Criminal Justice 1,280,000 0 1,280,000 Sales Tax-Public Safety 750,000 0 750,000 Gambling Tax and Leasehold Excise Tax 612,500 0 612,500 Franchise Fees/Business Registration 1,135,000 0 1,135,000 State Shared Revenues 1,684,600 0 1,684,600 Fines and Forfeitures/Public Safety 1,632,300 0 1,632,300 Community Development 1,174,000 0 1,174,000 Recreation Program Revenues 571,500 0 571,500 Miscellaneous&Investment Interest 158,000 0 158,000 Transfers in-#101 (street edmin) 39,700 0 39,700 Transfers in-#105(him tax-CPadvertising) 30,000 0 30,000 Transfers in-#402(storm admin) 13,400 0 13,400 Total Recurring Revenues 35,274,700 0 35,274,700 Expenditures City Council 390,111 0 390,111 City Manager 637,984 0 637,964 Legal 439,161 35,000 474,161 Public Safety 22,139,200 0 22,139,230 Deputy City Manager 609,706 0 609,736 Finance I IT 1,089,633 0 1,089,633 Human Resources 232,469 0 232,469 Public Works 876,443 0 876,443 Community Development-Administration 257,175 12,750 269,925 Community Development-Engineering 850,845 14,750 865,595 Community Development-Planning 899,743 12,750 912,493 Community Development-Building 1,162,582 12,750 1,175,332 Parks&Rec-Administration 270,717 0 270,717 Parks&Rec-Maintenance 789,000 0 789,000 Parks&Rec-Recreation 231,321 0 231,321 Parks&Rec-Aquatics 485,600 0 485,600 Parks&Rec-Senior Center 88,143 0 88,143 Parks&Rec-CenterPlace 800,884 0 800,884 Pavement Preservation 855,857 0 855,857 General Government 1,799,100 0 1,799,100 Transfers out-#502(insurance premium) 319,000 0 319,000 Total Recurring Expenditures 35,224,674 88,000 35,312,674 Recurring Revenues Over(Under) Recurring Expenditures 50,026 (88,000) (37,974) NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Transfers in-#120(excess reserves) 50,787 0 50,787 Total Nonrecurring Revenues 50,787 0 50,787 Expenditures Transfers out-#309(park grant match) 50,000 0 50,000 Transfers out-#312(Capital Reserve Fund) 7,826,207 0 7,826,207 Parks&Recreation related 56,962 0 56,962 Carpet at City Hall 25,000 0 25,000 Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 7,958,169 0 7,958,169 Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (7,907,382) 0 (7,907,382) Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues Over(Under)Total Expenditures (7,857,356) (88,000) (7,945,356) Beginning unrestricted fund balance 28,681,219 28,681,219 Ending unrestricted fund balance 20,823,863 20,735,863 Fund balance as a percent of recurring expenditures I 59,12%1 58.72% Page 1 of 4 \\SV-FS2\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2013\Amendments\Amendment#2\2013 09 24\budget report CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 2013 Budget 2013 As Amended Proposed As May 28 Amendment Amended SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS #101 -STREET FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Motor Vehicle Fuel(Gas)Tax 1,861,100 0 1,861,100 Investment Interest 5,000 0 5,000 Utility Tax 2,900,000 0 2,900,000 Total Recurring Revenues 4,766,100 0 4,766,100 Expenditures Wages I Benefits/Payroll Taxes 573,170 0 573,170 Supplies 72,200 0 72,200 Services&Charges 2,456,152 0 2,456,152 Snow Operations 469,000 0 469,000 Intergovernmental Payments 851,000 0 851,000 Transfers out-#001 39,700 0 39,700 Transfers out-#311 (pavement preservation) 282,000 0 282,000 Transfers out-#501 (plow replace.) 150,000 0 150,000 Transfers out-#501 (non-plow vehicle rental) 10,777 0 10,777 Total Recurring Expenditures 4,903,999 0 4,903,999 Recurring Revenues Over(Under) Recurring Expenditures (137,899) 0 (137,899) NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Grants 0 200,000 200,000 Total Nonrecurring Revenues C 200,000 200,000 Expenditures 133 Sprague/Sullivan ITS-phase 2 0 200,000 200,000 Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 0 200,000 200,000 Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures C 0 0 Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues Over(Under)Total Expenditures (137,899) 0 (137,899) Beginning fund balance 2,228,437 2,228,437 Ending fund balance 2,090,538 2,090,538 #108-HOTEL I MOTEL TAX FUND Revenues Hotel/Motel Tax 460,000 30,000 490,000 Investment Interest 500 0 500 Total revenues 460,500 30,000 490,540 Expenditures Transfers out-#001 30,000 0 30,000 City directed marketing efforts 55,000 0 55,000 Tourism Promotion-contracted 425,500 0 425,500 Tourism Promotion 0 0 0 Total expenditures 510,500 0 510,540 Revenues over(under)expenditures (50,000) (20,000) Beginning fund balance 206,772 206,772 Ending fund balance 156,772 186,772 Page 2 of 4 \\5V-F52\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2013\Amendments\Amendment 42\2013 09 24\budget report CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 2013 Budget 2013 As Amended Proposed As May 28 Amendment Amended CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS #303-STREET CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 6,597,842 0 6,597,842 Developer 0 0 0 Transfers in-#301 892,404 0 892,404 Transfers in-#302 617,479 0 617,479 Transfers in-#312-Appleway Landscaping 0 18,000 18,000 Transfers In-#312-Sullivan Rd W Bridge 0 0 0 Transfers in-#402 0 0 0 Total revenues 8,107,725 18,000 8,125,725 Expenditures 005 Pines/Mansfield,Wilbur Rd.to Pines 300,000 0 300,000 080 Argonne Rd Corridor Upgrade SRTC 957,892 0 957,892 061 Pines(SR27)ITS Imporvements 637,288 0 637,288 115 Sprague Ave Resurfacing-Evergreen to Sullivan 188,745 0 188,745 123 Mission Ave.-Flora to Barker 0 127,500 127,500 141 Sullivan&Euclid FCC(PE&RW) 139,332 0 139,332 142 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan FCC int,(PE/RW) 219,599 0 219,599 145 Spokane Valley-Millwood Trail 200,000 0 200,000 146 24th Ave Sidewalk-Adams to Sullivan 15,000 0 15,000 149 Sidewalk Infill 337,507 0 337,507 154 Sidewalk&Tansit Stop Accessibility 33,198 0 33,198 155 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement 800,000 0 800,000 156 Mansfield Ave.Connection 1,012,924 0 1,012,924 159 University Rd/1-90 Overpass Study 125,000 0 125,000 166 Pines Rd(SR27)&Grace Ave.Intersect Safety 98,100 0 98,100 167 Citywide Safety Improvements(bike/ped) 450,995 0 450,995 168 Wellesley Ave&Adams Rd Sidewalk 554,500 0 554,500 169 ArgonnelMullan Corridor Safety-Indiana to Broad 104,460 0 104,460 170 Argonne Road-Empire to Knox Corridor Safety 172,785 0 172,785 171 Sprague Ave ADA Sdwlk Improve(Havana-Fanc 110,400 0 110,400 176 Appleway Trail Design 150,000 0 150,000 177 Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study 0 100,000 100,000 181 Citywide Traffic Sign Upgrade 0 150,000 150,000 185 Appleway Landscaping-Phase 1 0 18,000 18,000 XXX ITS Infill Project Phase 1 (PE START 2014) 0 0 0 Contingency 1,500,000 (377,500) 1,122,500 Total expenditures 8,107,725 18,000 8,125,725 Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 Beginning fund balance 177,918 177,918 Ending fund balance 177,918 177,918 Page 3 of 4 \\SV-FS2\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2013\Amendments\Amendment#2\2013 09 24\budget report CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 2013 Budget 2013 As Amended Proposed As May28 Amendment_ Amended [CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued C #311-PAVEMENT PRESERVATION Revenues Transfers in-#101 282,000 0 282,000 Transfers in-#123 616,284 0 616,284 Transfers in-#301 150,000 0 150,000 Transfers in-#302 150,000 0 150,000 Grants 0 165,793 165.793 Total revenues 1,198,284 165,793 1,364,077 Expenditures Pavement preservation 1,198,284 850,172 2,048,456 Total expenditures 1,198,284 850,172 2,048,456 Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 (684,379) Beginning fund balance 948,733 948,733 Ending fund balance 948,733 264,354 #312-CAPITAL RESERVE FUND Revenues Transfers in-#001 7,826,207 0 7,826,207 Investment Interest 0 0 0 Total revenues 7,826,207 0 7,826,207 Expenditures Capital Outlays 0 0 0 Business Route Signage 60,000 0 60,000 Balfour Park!Library site development 42,150 0 42,150 Transfers out#303-Phase 1 -Appleway Landsc 0 18,000 18,000 Transfers out#303-Sullivan Rd W Bridge 0 0 0 Total expenditures 102,150 18,000 120,150 Revenues over(under)expenditures 7,724,057 7,706,057 Beginning fund balance 0 0 Ending fund balance 7,724,057 7,706,057 Page 4 of 4 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 24, 2013 Department Director Approval: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2014 Community Development Block Grant Program — Potential CDBG Projects GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: In May, 2011, Spokane Valley entered into a three- year agreement (2012-2014) to continue participation as a member of the Spokane County CDBG/HOME Consortium. BACKGROUND: The City of Spokane Valley is a member of the Spokane County Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Consortium. Each year the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development provides CDBG entitlement funding to Spokane County, with last year's funding totaling approximately $1.3 million. In 2008, Spokane County amended the CDBG funding policies to establish a 20% set-aside of the County's annual federal appropriation for City of Spokane Valley infrastructure projects. The County anticipates that Spokane Valley's 2014 share will be approximately $260,000 for eligible projects. Although Spokane Valley has a guaranteed set aside, the City must participate in the same application process as all other agencies requesting CDBG funding. To be eligible for CDBG funding, projects must be located in residential, low to moderate income target areas (see attached map). Proposed projects must also be ranked as a "high priority" in the Spokane County 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan, the guiding document for Spokane County's CDBG program. High priority infrastructure projects include water, sewer and street improvements. Following the 2013 CDBG allocation process, Spokane Valley submitted a proposed amendment to the Spokane County 2012-2104 Consolidated Plan to change sidewalk projects from Low Priority to High Priority. This amendment would have allowed Spokane Valley to use CDBG funds for sidewalk projects in the target areas. Rather than amending the Consolidated Plan, Spokane County Commissioners signed a resolution specifically allowing Spokane Valley to use CDGB funds for sidewalk projects (see attached resolution). The justification was largely based upon public outreach and needs assessment conducted as part of the Spokane Valley Bike and Pedestrian Plan. The CDBG application deadline is November 9, 2013. A public hearing on the City's potential projects is scheduled for October 8, 2013. The following projects have been identified by City staff based on an evaluation of sidewalk needs in CDBG target areas: Staff Proposed CDBG Sidewalk Projects Estimated Costs 1. Sprague Avenue, Appleway to Artie Ln., south side $288,000 Long Rd., south of Sprague to school (missing gaps) Other Considered CDBG Sidewalk Projects 2. Farr Rd., 6th to 8th Ave., east side $81,013 3. 4t" Avenue, Long to Greenacres, north side 172,809 4. 4t" Avenue, Long to Greenacres, south side 239,986 5. Mission Ave., east of Barker, south side 159,893 6. Park Rd., Broadway to 1-90, west side 157,438 7. Park Rd., Sharp to Indiana, west side 432,064 8. Park Rd., Sinto to Indiana, east side 461,476 Spokane Valley staff focused on sidewalk gaps within proximity to schools in the CDGB target areas. In some instances, the street established the dividing line between qualifying and non- qualifying areas. In these instances, only the side within the CDGB target area would be eligible for CDBG finding. All of the proposed projects are identified on the City's Pedestrian Network map in the Spokane Valley Bike and Pedestrian program. City staff has consulted the Central Valley School District (CVSD) on the sidewalk projects and they expressed support for the Sprague/Long proposal. Staff inquired if CVSD would be interested in providing funding assistance for the projects that provide safe passage to schools. Ben Small, CVSD Superintendent, responded that some funding assistance may be possible and will bring the issue before the CVSD Board in October. OPTIONS: Discussion. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consensus on a list of Proposed CDBG Sidewalk Projects to present at the scheduled public hearing on October 8, 2013. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: CDBG grants are typically funded at 100% of the total project cost. STAFF CONTACT: Scott Kuhta, Planning Division Manager Steve Worley, Senior Capital Projects Engineer ATTACHMENTS: - CDBG Proposed Sidewalk Map - Spokane County Resolution - Presentation City Council Regular Meeting September 24, 2013 Community Development Block Grant Project Ideas COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT :PLANNING DIVISION Sprague Avenue — Looking toward Appleway 2 Sprague Avenue — Looking East 3 Sijolia Fie moos.Ntailey COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION Long Road — Looking North 4 Long Road — Looking North Stokane Val le COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION Farr Road — Looking North •■ te 111"11111;1111111111111 i11.1ti1M1 6 Spot;a Fie Val ley COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 4th Avenue — Looking East 4th Avenue — Looking West Mission Ave. — Looking towards Barker Mission Ave. — Looking East Sprihane ' Val ley COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION Park at Sinto — Looking North Park at Mission — Looking South k3ne Val ley COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION Park Road at Broadway — Looking North Park at Cataldo — Looking South 10 Questions ? NO. /3—®(Q/7, BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER CONCERNING THE SET-ASIDE OF ) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ) (CDBG) FUNDS FOR FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2014 ) RESOLUTION AS A CONDITION OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE ) VALLEY PARTICIPATING IN SPOKANE COUNTY'S ) URBAN COUNTY FOR FEDERAL FISCAL YEARS ) 2012,2013,AND 2014 ) WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, pursuant to the provisions of RCW 36.32.120(6),has the care of County property and the management of County funds and business;and WHEREAS, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD) has the authority to make available to counties, funds for community development purposes pursuant to various federal laws including CFR Title, 24, Chapter V, Part 570, Community Development Block Grants (CDBG); and HOME affordable Housing Projects under 24 CFR Section 92.150(HOME Investment Partnership);and WHEREAS, Spokane County had been notified by HUD that Urban County requalification is necessary for the award of 2012 through 2014 CDBG and HOME Investment Partnership Act(HOME)funding;and WHEREAS, the amount of CDBG funds to which the County may be entitled is in part dependent upon the population of other CDBG eligible cities and towns which elect to participate in the CDBG and HOME Entitlement Programs with the County;and WHEREAS, pursuant to the level of CDBG funds appropriated to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Spokane County established a set-aside based upon twenty percent of each annual allocation of CDBG funding for the purpose of eligible and allowable infrastructure improvements within the City of Spokane Valley meeting federal national objectives and consolidated plan priorities;and WHEREAS, City of Spokane Valley adopted a Bike and Pedestrian Master Program (BPMP) which identified 48 miles of needed sidewalk improvements within low to moderate income residential neighborhoods and desires to be able to use its set-aside for these sidewalk improvements. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED,by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County that the City of Spokane Valley's request to establish a set-aside within the Community Development Block Grant Program is approved for eligible and allowable infrastructure improvements within the City of Spokane Valley meeting federal national objectives and consolidated plan high priorities or sidewalk improvements as identified within the BPMP and that the Chair of the Board of County Commissioners or a majority of the Board are the official representatives of Spokane County authorized to approve CDBG Program requests. APPROVED BY THE BOARD this 16th day of July,2013. ■�\AC .=.44' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ( % )iAEö . . OF SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON �,LD . 5 ly O'Qui � air ATTEST: F� %.°.. E ..'•, r /1 �, / i I ,< Al French,Vic°-Chair Daniela Erickson,Clerk oft e Board fro,at, / Tod ielke,Commissioner sr' okane Valley DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 i Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000• Fax: 509.921.1008 f cItyhallespokanevalley.org Proposed Amendment to the Spokane County 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan March 1,2012 1. Proponent: City of Spokane Valley Address: 11707 East Sprague Ave.,Suite 106 Spokane Valley,WA 99206 Contact: Scott Kuhta,AICP, Planning Manager(skuhtaPsvokanevaliev.org) 2, Description of Proposed Amendment: The City of Spokane Valley proposes a minor amendment to the 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan; specifically changing sidewalks from a Low Priority to a High Priority under the infrastructure category In Table 2B—Priority Community Development Needs(page 128).The City of Spokane Valley believes that this change will facilitate the construction of safer pedestrian routes serving low and moderate income neighborhoods throughout Spokane County. 3. Principles of Consolidated Plan: • Priority to lowest-income: The proposed change will enable all members of the Spokane County CDBG Consortium to use CDBG funding to build sidewalks in low Income neighborhoods. As the price of owning an automobile rises and our population ages,safe and convenient pedestrian access from neighborhoods to transit,services and schools is Increasingly critical. • Basic Support: The proposed amendment falls under the Infrastructure"category and does not Impact important Public Services that address basic community needs. • Citizen Participation: The City of Spokane Valley adopted a Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Program(BPMP)in 2011,now integrated as a chapter In the City's Comprehensive Plan. The BPMP process provided ample opportunity for citizen Involvement,Including workshops,open houses and surveys. Over 900 people were on the program's contact database and over 350 people responded to an online survey where information was gathered on biking and walking in the City. When asked what prevents a person from biking or walking,an overwhelming 70%of the respondents said It was due to a lack of facilities. Through this process,a map was created that showed areas with missing sidewalk connections,many of which are located in low and moderate Income residential neighborhoods. • Collaboration: The City's BPMP process relied heavily on collaboration with the Spokane Regional Health District,Central,East,and West Valley School Districts,bicycle advocacy groups,Spokane Transit,Spokane Valley Public Works Department and other agencies in developing the BPMP. The groups have"ownership"in the BPMP and its successful implementation will directly benefit low and moderate income neighborhoods. Changing the sidewalk priority from low to high will help expedite Implementing the BPMP. • Emphasize the Potential: The proposed change will help provide our city and other Jurisdictions the opportunity to improve our pedestrian connections to public transit. Better connections to public transit will enable low and moderate income residents to access critical services. • Leverage: The City's BPMP was created through partnerships with various public and private entities and its implementation will rely on these partnerships to help guide limited resources to the high priority areas. • Measurable Results: The City annually updates Its sidewalk inventory maps,so we can measure results in linear footage of sidewalks constructed throughout the City. The maps currently show that 48 miles of sidewalks are missing throughout low and moderate income residential neighborhoods. The proposed amendment will enable the City to fill the void on the maps where sidewalks are needed throughout low and moderate income areas. • Comprehensive: The City's Bike and Pedestrian Master Program was developed with assistance from the Spokane Regional Health District. There is an increasing Interest in linking our built environment to public health. The BPMP states that literature reviews have shown that urban design and land use policies creating opportunities for physical activity within communities have been effective and are considered best practices for increasing a community's health and reducing obesity". The SRHD considers socio-economic factors as they relate to health. SRHD advocates for better bicycle and pedestrian facilities,especially in low and moderate income areas as these populations are most vulnerable to Increasing cost of owning and operating a car. Between 2004 and 2008,43.9 percent of the City's population was at or below the 200 percent federal poverty level,more than twice the national average. A substantial portion of the population cannot afford automobile transportation. For these people,In addition to the young in age and an aging population,getting around by walking,biking or transit is a necessity. Building more sidewalks in low and moderate neighborhoods will encourage people to walk,thus making them healthier and providing a safer means to access public services. 4. Why the Change Should be Made: Spokane Valley's Bike and Pedestrian Master Program was developed through collaboration with various public agencies,private interest groups and interested citizens.The community showed strong interest in developing safe facilities for biking and walking,including safe routes to schools. The BMPM Includes a Recommended Pedestrian Network map that shows existing and proposed sidewalks and another map showing Safe Routes to Schools. The map attached to this proposed amendment overlays existing and proposed sidewalks and safe routes to schools onto the 2010 Low and Moderate Income Block Groups, Our analysis shows the following data in low and moderate income residential neighborhoods(note that only residentially zone properties were included): Proposed Sidewalks—181,729 ft Existing Sidewalks—225,316 ft Safe Routes to Schools—74,770 ft Therefore,our data shows that about 48 linear miles of sidewalk are needed in low and moderate income neighborhoods In Spokane Valley alone. The City has very limited means to build sidewalks in existing residential neighborhoods. Sidewalks are typically constructed by private developers for new development. Sidewalks are also constructed by the City during road upgrades. However,federal and state funds can typically only be used on streets classified as arterials. Therefore,very limited funding is available for local neighborhood streets/sidewalks that connect to the arterials. As highlighted above,people with low incomes are finding it increasingly more difficult to afford an automobile as a primary means of transportation. We believe very strongly that sidewalk should be listed as a high priority infrastructure project In the Spokane County Consolidated Plan. We believe the community supports better pedestrian facilities. Thank you for your consideration: ;2--/,.,2(//3 Mike Jackso ,City Manger Date (.i Total linear feet of Proposed%dream-within Proposed Mamas—181,729 ft Existing Qdrwelits=225.316 It Safe Routes So Schools=74.770 ft I . Away..avid I.rage..de.coderanr iela The CAS-m.6m ma nbeze� "~= N~~~� -- Submit to Clerk of the Board with accompanying paperwork(Resolution,Agreements, etc.) AGENDA SHEET SUBMITTING DEPARTMENT: Community Services, Housing, and Community Development CONTACT PERSON: Heather Arnold PHONE NUMBER: 509-477-4517 CHECK TYPE OF MEETING ITEM BELOW: BELOW FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY: 2:00 PM CONSENT AGENDA: ® Clerk's Resolution No. /3—010 702 BY LEAVE:❑ Approved: Majority/Unanimous Denied: Majority/Unanimous 5:00 PM LEGISLATIVE SESSION:❑ Renews/Amends No. BY LEAVE: ❑ Public Works No. Purchasing Dept.No. SPECIAL SESSION: ❑ AGENDA TITLE: IN THE MATTER CONCERNING THE SET-ASIDE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDS FOR FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2014 AS A CONDITION OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY PARTICIPATING IN SPOKANE COUNTY'S URBAN COUNTY FOR FEDERAL FISCAL YEARS 2012, 2013, AND 2014. BACKGROUND (Attach separate sheet(s) if necessary): The City of Spokane Valley had requested a set aside in CDBG funding in the amount of up to 20% of each annual allocation of CDBG funding for the purpose of eligible and allowable infrastructure improvements within the City of Spokane Valley, meeting federal national objectives and consolidated plan priorities. The Spokane County Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee as well as the department had accepted and recommended approval of the City's request, which was eventually adopted through prior BoCC resolutions. Thus, for fiscal years 2009-2013, this set-aside has been in effect. The City of Spokane Valley, after development of a Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Program (BPMP), which is now integrated as a chapter in the City's Comprehensive Plan, proposes a change in the agreement which would allow for them to fund sidewalk improvements, an eligible CDBG activity but one that is currently identified as a low priority need in the County Consolidated Plan. After considerable citizen participation, through collaboration with various public agencies and private interest groups, the BPMP identified forty-eight (48) miles of sidewalks which are missing throughout low and moderate income residential neighborhoods. The proposed amendment to the agreement with Spokane Valley would allow for them to fund these needed sidewalk improvements, as well as other eligible projects. RECOMMENDATION: Approve FISCAL IMPACT: No changes SIGNATURES: Christine Barada Department Head/Elected Official or Marshall Farnell De gnated Aut • ' •::ting Agen•a Item) Chief Executive Officer A • S k 111 4�! 1__111LIAP Gr. is Admini:trator(sign-off) ❑ This item needs to be codified in the County Code Book. A B C D E F 2014 CDBG Sidewalk Projects 2 35 , ., Hosp. 0001.0d00110 = 0 Poke sat,. PR°P°s. =ARM 32 • i 1 6 6 6,, 1.11: ,6..1-.1 '1 A - T T26N , ,, I -P- ■' 1 ,_ —1 „,1 , 1 i —Th \ .. "------,---. , •,. .. - - 6 _ ' ....' ' OW IW—. . . . — , t:'' , . •'''ZI r'..,. --J 1 1, . ," Or . I .'''''' ..° 1 , i .,... :-.6.6.. -,.. ,-.6.• . --" '1 6 ......., 46. _Al MEM ..... - . . ,_ 4 5 6 .,. - - -.° gE = .1 i_t-t '" - aigllm 7n:m' imn7. iilr,i t • dMlml illlfflI -- ' - , 0 t, t, 25 - .., MIR • „.., „ 25 , ,30 ' Mel MI EMIEWEIM El IMI.. ° 29 , ,...- 1.Sprague Avenue,Appleway to Arties Ln,south side Long Rd,south of Sprague(missing gaps) 2.Farr Rd,6th to 8th Ave 3.4th Avenue,Long to Greenacres,north side 4.4th Avenue,Long to Greenacres,south side 5.Mission Ave,east of Barker,south side 6.Park Rd,Broadway to 1-90,west side 7.Park Rd,Sharp to Indiana,west side 8.Park Rd,Sinto to Indiana,east side ' 2... - , ,, I 31 1-•'`, ' '4 -4 „...t„, t)I ',Lir l'-1 .. , 35 35 4t , ,-, ,...: . ,\ ‘.. 5N '1. .1. I ,;,..,„° ,,,,.I-- 0C, - 724N 1 1 01 , I 06 02 ■ , ' 01 02 0 , . 0 03 05 I 06 05 —— - ,- - - -- -4-----y ----,-- --- - ---------------- ---------------------- - ---- --- --- 1 .....Valley A B C D E CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 24, 2013 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Horizon 2040 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: On September 3, 2013 Council heard a presentation by Kevin Wallace, Executive Director of the Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC), on Horizon 2040. Horizon 2040 is the new proposed Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP). More specifically, the presentation focused on the development of the Preliminary Draft of Chapter 4, which is entitled "How We'll Get There." Chapter 4 includes a list of proposed projects that would be eligible for future federal funding. Council requested a presentation from staff on how the draft Horizon 2040 plan will affect future federal funding for Spokane Valley projects. In response, staff has prepared the attached presentation. OPTIONS: Discussion RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Comments from Council are desired to assist staff in providing feedback to SRTC on the draft Chapter 4 of the Horizon 2040 plan. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Worley, P.E. — Senior Capital Projects Engineer Eric Guth, P.E. — Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint Presentation 1 HORIZON 2040 SRTC'S PROPOSED NEW METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN (MTP ) How does it affect Spokane Valley? What is Horizon 2040 ? ❑ 20+ year blueprint ❑ Establishes regional transportation priorities ❑ Guides multi-modal transportation investments ❑ Satisfies federal & state planning requirements, including coordination w/ SRTC, STA, and WSDOT HORIZON 2040 )--'\\ Spokane Metropolitan T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P l a n SRTC •3 mane 1ona(remq or&fton Coune What is Horizon 2040 ? All federally funded transportation projects must: ❑ Be consistent with the MTP ❑ Must be included in SRTC's 4-Year Transportation Improvement Program HORIZON 2040 )--'\\ Spokane Metropolitan T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P l a n SRTC •3 mane 1ona(remq or&fton Coune Draft MTP O Chapter 1 : Who We Are O Chapter 2: Where We' re At O Chapter 3: Where We' re Going Chapter 4: How We Will Get There 5 Draft MTP Can be found online at: www.srtc.org/mtp_2040.html Search SRTC , iC o4me ' iona(7rransportaion Council About Board&Committees Programs I Projects Documents i Maps Technical Resources HGRRZO H 2040 3 n fographic(click on Me image below[o yew a larger image.) HORIZON rim ipe HORIZON 2040:The Metropolitan Transportation Plan for the Spokane Metropolitan Planning Area SRTC is in the proccas of updating the Metropolitan Transportation Plan[MTP),Horizon 2040.The MTP is a long-temr,multimodal'blueprint'for transportation aimed at meeting the mobility needs of the area through the year 2040.It is based on projections for growth in population,housing and jobs and takes into consideration every mode of transportation,such as private vehicles,public transit,bicycling, walking,freight movement,rail and air travel.The MTP is key to the quality of life and economic health of our region. When complete,Horizon 2040 will include a financially-constrained list of transportation projects from each of the jurisdictions within Spokane County to construct or complete over the next 2D+years. The MTP is required by the Federal government to be updated at least every four years.The development process involves extensive input from the public Because the transportation system is used by every single person in one way or another,we'd like to know how you would like the transportation system to develop in the future. MTP Scope of Work During the MTP update,the plans format will be completely revamped,essentially developing a whole new plan that is more informative and user-friendly than past MTP documents.A scope of work for Horizon 2340 has been developed, City Cable 5 worked with SRTC fa produce this with the SRTC Policy Board targetted to adopt video on Horizon 2040,what it means for the the plan m December 2013 The scope of work community and how you can be involved.Click the can be viewed here. image above to view the video on YouTube. Members of SRTC s Transportation Advisory Committee ITAC)used conclusions and recommendations from the 2010 Transportation Vision Project lc craft Guiding Principles.They were,in turn used to create a policy framework for the MTP_ Public Involvement There will be many opportunities to get involved and provide your input during the MTP update process. SRTC will host open houses,attend community events,and partner with other agencies on public meetings during the course of the update. Check this page to stay up to date and for ways to participate. 6 Focus of MTP NpRIZON104p Maintenance & Preservation Economic Vitality System Operations, Maintenance and Preservation ; Stewardship Choi[ and Mobility Cooperation and Leadership Safety and Security Quality of Life • Principal Arterials only (NHS) Transportation Corridors: • Freight/Commerce • Urban • Neighborhood Corridor Screening Process Corridors Population/Employment Congestion Developable Lands Collisions Corridors Freight/Commerce Corridor ❑ Connects employment activity centers such as manufacturing and distribution ❑ Efficiently move goods, services and people ❑ Roads that can accommodate higher volume freight and person travel ❑ Regional/Interstate Scale (1-90 and the NSC) ❑ Local Access Scale (Maple/Ash & Thor/Freya) 9 Urban Corridor ❑ Corridors that can accommodate new ❑ Regional-scale investments (e.g. mixed-use development (e.g., Division) HPTN Red and Green Lines, bike lanes, ❑ Roads that can accommodate multi-modal sidewalks) travel: cars, transit, bikes, and pedestrians Neighborhood Corridor 10 ❑ Districts that can accommodate some new mixed-use development (South Perry) ❑ Compact, walkable neighborhood corridors ❑ Roads that can accommodate multi- modal travel: cars, transit, bikes, and pedestrians ❑ Neighborhood-scale investments (local transit routes, bike lanes, enhanced pedestrian environment) Highest Performing Corridors Freight/Commerce ❑ Interstate 90 ❑ US 395 North Spokane Corridor ❑ US 2 — West ❑ Sullivan Road ❑ Argonne Road ❑ Market-Haven-Greene-Freya Highest Performing Corridors Urban Neighborhood ❑ Division - Ruby- Browne St ❑ Mission Ave & Hamilton St ❑ Sprague — Appleway Ave ❑ Grand Blvd & 14th Ave ❑ Monroe St ❑ 29th Ave — SE Blvd to Regal St ❑ Grand Blvd ❑ [Appleway, Barker, Mission] ❑ 29th Ave Sullivan to Liberty Lake ❑ Regal St ❑ Maxwell — Mission Ave ❑ Examples (existing) : Garland District, South Perry District MTP Projects List ❑ Must be Financially Constrained o Cost of projects cannot exceed available resources o Includes all years through 2040 ❑ Focused on: o Maintenance & Preservation — Principal Arterials only o High Performing Corridors o Regionally Significant projects SfiCikan City of Spokane Valley Projects jualle` ❑ Barker Road Overpass — Barker/Trent/BNSF Short-Term (2014-2020) ❑ SR27/SR290 Underpass — Pines/Trent/BNSF Mid-Term (2021 -2031) ❑ Sullivan Rd Bridges — Sullivan/Trent/BNSF Long-Term (2031 -2040) Other Projects in Spokane Valley >Valley ❑ STA: South Valley Corridor Preservation - Short-Term (2014-2020) ❑ WSDOT: Interstate 90-Barker Rd I/C — Short-Term (2014-2020) ❑ WSDOT: Interstate 90-Barker To Harvard — Short-Term (2014-2020) ❑ Spokane County: Bigelow Gulch Rd. Project 6-Forker Connector — Mid-Term (2021 -2031) ❑ STA: South Valley Corridor Preservation — Mid-Term (2021 -2031) Note: Spokane County's Bigelow Gulch Projects 2, 3, 4 and 4A are all included in the Short-Term project list. S colia<%' Unfunded Spokane Valley Projects jualle` l lik ❑ Park Rd Overpass (Park/Trent/BNSF) ❑ Argonne Road Corridor Project ❑ Sullivan Road Corridor Project which includes: 1 ) Replacing the bridge over the Spokane River (to be completed) 2) Resurfacing the bridge over the UPRR (SB bridge completed) 3) Widening the bridges over Trent/BNSF 4) Concreting the corridor from 1-90 to Trent What Does This Mean for CoSV? ju��` Future federal funding from SRTC focused on: ® Maintenance & Preservation of Principal Arterials only O Capital Projects within Identified Corridors ". . .prioritize regional transportation corridors for improvements with the limited funding available." O Regionally Significant Projects Suggested Comments to SRTC Spokane Valley ❑ Include Barker Road as a Freight Corridor (Appleway to Trent) ❑ Provide details on annual funding resources for all agencies (WSDOT, STA, Cities, County) ❑ Include Preservation of Minor Arterials ❑ Clarify Sullivan Rd Corridor Project SRTC's Next Steps Mk ❑ Ongoing Community Outreach ❑ Preliminary draft chapters on the SRTC website ❑ Financial Plan, Scenario Analysis/Strategies — In Process ❑ Agency review period — mid-Aug. through mid-Sept. ❑ Public comment period — mid-Sept. to mid-Oct. ❑ SRTC Board approval — November/December Questions/Discussion/Comments DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA For Planning Discussion Purposes Only as of September 18,2013; 11:30 a.m. Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative To: Council & Staff From: City Clerk, by direction of City Manager Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings Oct 1,2013 meeting cancelled Oct 8,2013,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Sept 30] Proclamation: Careers in Energy 1. PUBLIC HEARING: CDBG Projects—Scott Kuhta (10 minutes) 2. PUBLIC HEARING: 2013 Budget Amendment—Mark Calhoun (15 minutes) 3. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 4. Second Reading Property Tax Ordinance—Mark Calhoun (10 minutes) 5.First Reading Ordinance Amending 2013 Budget—Mark Calhoun (10 minutes) 6.First Reading Ordinance Adopting 2014 Budget—Mark Calhoun (10 minutes) 7.Motion Consideration: Approval of CDBG Projects—Scott Kuhta (10 minutes) 8.Motion Consideration: Site Selector Agreement —Cary Driskell (10 minutes) 9.Motion Consideration: Bid Award,Argonne Rd& Sprague Ave St. Pres.Prjt—Eric Guth (5 minutes) 10.Motion Consideration: Decant Facility,Phase 2 Bid Award—Eric Guth (5 minutes) 11.Motion Consideration: Mayoral Appointment,citizen to HCDAC—Mayor Towey (5 minutes) 12.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 13. Information Only: Balfour Park/Library Conceptual Plan [*estimated meeting: 100 minutes] Oct 15,2013, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Oct 7] 1. Comp Plan Draft Docket—Lori Barlow (20 minutes) 2.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: minutes] Oct 17, 2013, 6-8 p.m. AWC Regional Meeting, Spokane, Wa. Red Lion Inn at the Park Oct 22,2013,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Oct 14] Oct Community Recognition, Presentation of Key and Certificate—Mayor Towey (5 minutes) 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Second Reading Ordinance Amending 2013 Budget—Mark Calhoun (10 minutes) 3. Second Reading Ordinance Adopting 2014 Budget—Mark Calhoun (10 minutes) 4.Admin Report: Proposed Street Vacation(Alki)—Marty Palaniuk (15 minutes) 5.Admin Report: Balfour Park/Library Conceptual Plan—Mike Stone (15 minutes) 6.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 7. Information Only: Dept Reports; Planning Commission Minutes [*estimated meeting: 65 minutes] Oct 29,2013, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Oct 23]] ACTION ITEM: 1.Motion Consideration: Balfour Park/Library Conceptual Plan—Mike Stone (15 minutes) NON-ACTION ITEMS: 2. Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Recommendations to Council—Mark Calhoun (20 minutes) 3.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 40 minutes] Nov 5,2013 Meeting Cancelled (election night) Draft Advance Agenda 9/19/2013 11:51:16 AM Page 1 of 2 Nov 12,2013,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. (possible no meeting) [due Mon,Nov 4] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2.First Reading Ordinance for Street Vacation (Alki)—Marty Palaniuk (15 minutes) 3.Motion Consideration: Approval of Comprehensive Plan Docket—John Hohman (15 minutes) 4.Admin Report: 2014 Fee Resolution—Mark Calhoun (15 minutes) 5.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 55 minutes] Nov 13—16:NLC Conference,Seattle Nov 19,2013, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Nov 11] Nov Community Recognition, Presentation of Key and Certificate—Mayor Towey (5 minutes) 1.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: minutes] Nov 26 2013,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Nov 18] Oath of Office to Councilmember Position#1 (completing term vacated by B.Grassel) (5 minutes) 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Second Reading Ordinance for Street Vacation(Alki)-Marty Palaniuk (10 minutes) 3. Information Only: Dept Reports;Planning Commission Minutes [*estimated meeting: minutes] Dec 3,2013, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Nov 25) 1.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) Dec 10,2013,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Dec 2] Dec Community Recognition, Presentation of Key and Certificate—Mayor Towey (5 minutes) 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Proposed Resolution Amending Fee Resolution for 2014—Mark Calhoun (10 minutes) 3.Motion Consideration: Lodging Tax Allocations for 2014—Mark Calhoun (25 minutes) 4.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 50 minutes] Dec 17,2013, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Dec 9] Oath of Office to Councilmembers (Positions 1, 4, 5, 7) (10 minutes) 1.Mayoral Appointments to Planning Commission(2 positions set to expire 12-31-2013) (5 minutes) 2.Mayoral Appointments to LTAC(2 positions set to expire 12-31-2013) (5 minutes) 3.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: minutes] Dec 24,2013 no meeting—Christmas Eve Dec 31,2013 no meeting—New Year's Eve January 7,2014, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Dec 30] 1. Council Officer Elections (select Mayor and Deputy Mayor)—Chris Bainbridge (10 minutes) OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: Appt.,Mayoral committee appointments for 2014 Park& Recreation Master Plan ADA Transition Plan PEG Funds(Education) Avista Electrical Franchise Public Safety Contract,Proposed Amendment Coal Train EIS Townhouses in Garden Office Future Acquisition Areas Legislative Agenda *time for public or Council comments not included Draft Advance Agenda 9/19/2013 11:51:16 AM Page 2 of 2 MEMO TO: Mike Jackson, City Manager FROM: Rick VanLeuven, Chief of Police DATE: September 13,2013 RE: Monthly Report August 2013 August 2013: August 2012: CAD incidents: 5,211 CAD incidents: 5,256 Reports taken: 1,820 Reports taken: 1,949 Traffic stops: 951 Traffic stops: 1,150 Traffic reports: 257 Traffic reports: 326 CAD incidents indicate calls for service as well as self-initiated officer contacts. Hot spot maps are attached showing August residential burglaries, traffic collisions, vehicle prowlings, and stolen vehicles. Also attached are trend-line graphs for 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013: Citations, Spokane Valley Dispatched Calls, Self-Initiated Calls, Collisions, Persons Crimes, Property Crimes, and Sex Crimes. Also included is the August Crimes by Cities stats report. This report reflects incidents that occurred in a specific city to which a deputy from Spokane County took the courtesy report. For instance, an individual may have had his car stolen in Airway Heights, and he waited until he returned home in the Newman Lake to make a report. In 2011, we switched from UCR to NIBRS classification. As a result, certain crimes were broken down to their violation parts for NIBRS and each part is now counted. Consequently, comparing certain crimes before 2011 to crimes during or after 2011 is not possible using the graphs. The crimes that are impacted by the NIBRS classification changes and should not be compared to prior graphs include: Adult Rape, Assault, Forgery and Theft. ADMINISTRATIVE: Tuesday, August 6, 2013, in the afternoon and evening, neighbors across Spokane County gathered for the 30th Annual National Night Out Against Crime sponsored by the National Association of Town Watch. Chief Van Leuven attended seven Spokane Valley NNO parties. Citizens, civic groups, businesses, neighborhood organizations, apartment complexes, homeowner's associations, military bases, and others met with neighbors and the community in an effort to reduce crime. As is done each year, everyone was invited to lock their doors, turn on outside lights, keep watch over the neighborhood and enjoy a neighborhood potluck, BBQ, ice cream social or just getting together as a group and meet your neighbors. This is an excellent chance for law enforcement to drop by and answer any questions citizens may have on crime in their neighborhood or provide crime preventions tips. Page 1 Chief VanLeuven attended a mandatory one-day in-service training during the month of August. 1.11 • - Target's Back-To-School Kids Shopping day occurred f in late August. Chief VanLeuven was paired up with a young man who needed a few items to start off the - ( school year Sponsored by the Salvation Army, men and ' ' --- women from area law enforcement agencies are paired up with kids to shop for Back-To-School supplies and i clothes. This is quite an enjoyable event for FiL deputies/officers to attend, watching those children t � picking out items they may not normally afford to buy. " It also builds a good relationship with the youngsters, deri encouraging them to approach law enforcement if/when needed. Quarterly Leadership Training was held in August, which Chief VanLeuven attended along with other members of Spokane Valley Police and the Sheriff's Office. Chief VanLeuven was on-call the last week of August. COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING: They participated in the following events during the month of August: ➢ National Night Out Celebration ➢ Safe Kids Meeting ➢ Spokane Interstate Fair Safety Meeting ➢ My ID Club Presentation (Finger Printing and ID Program) ➢ Spokane Crime Stoppers Meeting ➢ Valley Cruz Car Show ➢ Fall Free Spokane Coalition Meeting ➢ GSSAC Coalition Meeting ➢ Operation Family ID August 2013 Volunteers Hours per station: Location #Volunteers Admin Hours L.E. Hours Total Hours Central Valley 10 449.5 103.5 553.0 Edgecliff 22 540.0 39.0 579.0 Trentwood 6 350.0 66.0 416.0 University 32 579.5 289.0 868.5 TOTALS 70 1,919.0 497.5 2,416.5 Volunteer Value ($21.62 per hour) $52,244.73 for August 2013 Page 2 The Latent Fingerprint Team was dispatched to a total of 89 incidents during the month of August; 49 of those incidents were located within Spokane Valley. Year-to-date, the team has responded to 460 incidents within Spokane County; 256 of those incidents were in Spokane Valley. S.C.O.P.E. Incident Response Team (SIRT) volunteers contributed 142 on-scene hours (including travel time) in August, responding to crime scenes, motor vehicle accidents and providing traffic control. Of those hours, 48 hours were for incidents in Spokane Valley. Special Event hours for Spokane Valley totaled 10. Total August volunteer hours contributed by SIRT, including training, stand-by, response and special events is 504; year-to-date total is 4,554 hours. S.C.O.P.E. DISABLED PARKING ACTIVITY REPORT City of Spokane Valley # of #of Hrs #of Disabled #of #of Non- Vol. Infractions Warnings Disabled Issued Issued Infractions Issued January 6 123 22 0 0 February 4 83 11 0 0 March 7 147.5 36 0 0 April 8 160 28 0 0 May 4 86 4 0 0 June 4 129 26 0 0 July 2 55.5 8 0 0 August 4 86 22 0 0 Total 39 870 157 0 0 Spokane County # of #of Hrs #of Disabled #of #of Non- Vol. Infractions Warnings Disabled Issued Issued Infractions Issued January 2 2 0 0 0 February 2 6 0 0 0 March 3 31 0 0 0 April 3 24 5 0 0 May 1 11 0 0 0 June 0 0 0 0 0 July 0 0 0 0 0 August 0 0 0 0 0 Total 11 74 5 0 0 Abandoned vehicles tagged by S.C.O.P.E. volunteers for impoundment in Spokane Valley in July totaled 12 and in August 19 with 5 vehicles in July and 5 in August, respectively, eventually cited and towed. Sixteen hulks were processed in July and 21 hulks processed in August. During the month of August, a total of 80 vehicles were processed; the total for 2013 to date is 510. Page 3 OPERATIONS: Burglar Meets K9 - On a Saturday morning in early August, at about 6:15 a.m., Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputies responded to the area of 5900 E. Sharp to a burglary-in-progress call. The business owner had located a 50-year-old male inside the fenced area of the business driving a forklift. He had struck the building with the forklift and damaged the fence. Once confronted,he jumped an eight-foot barbed-wire fence into another business and took off running. Deputy Jeff Thurman and his K9 partner Laslo responded to the scene. They initially were able to track and locate the male suspect on a flat bed train car. When deputies gave the male commands, he failed to comply and ran from deputies. Laslo was deployed and made contact with the male suspect on his right upper thigh. He was taken into custody without incident. The male suspect chose to answer Deputy Scott Streltzoffs questions. He told Deputy Streltzoff that he was doing maintenance security and thought he had a job at the business. He also told Deputy Streltzoff he worked for a company that show security deficiencies on peoples' properties. Last, but not least, the male suspect asked Deputy Streltzoff if Deputy Thurman sharpened Laslo's teeth because they hurt so badly when he was bit. The male suspect was booked into the Spokane County Jail on the felony charge of 2nd Degree Burglary. Fatal Injury Collision - On a Wednesday afternoon in early August, Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputies responded to 3rd and Howe to a vehicle vs. pedestrian collision. The pedestrian had been involved in a collision where the Sprague on-ramp and Fancher on-ramp join to enter westbound I-90. The pedestrian was the victim of the initial collision where a box van made an improper turn across the median from the Sprague on-ramp onto 3rd Ave. The victim driver walked northbound across 3rd to contact the driver of the initial collision. After speaking with the driver, the 30-year-old male victim was walking south across 3rd back to his vehicle talking on his cell phone. A vehicle driving westbound on 3rd struck the victim from the initial collision on the front passenger side of his vehicle. The 33-year-old male driver was not impaired and collision investigators did not cite the driver for any infractions. The 30-year-old victim was transported to a local hospital where he was pronounced deceased. The driver of the box van was cited for the improper turn. Latest Phone Scam Involves Sheriff's Office - The Spokane County Sheriffs Office administrative office has received several calls over the past two to three months regarding phone calls citizens have received. Citizens have been receiving calls where the caller says they are from the Sheriffs Office, that there is a warrant out for their arrest, that their relative, spouse, etc. may be charged for harboring a wanted person, and that if they pay a fee, their record will be cleared. The Sheriffs Office has never and will never make these types of calls. Individuals with warrants can only take care of their warrants by contacting the court in person. The main issue is that caller ID provides the Sheriffs Office administration number. This is commonly referred to as "Spoofing." Attached is a link that explains this scam, what citizens need to do to protect themselves, and how to report these types of incidents. The Sheriffs Office will never contact wanted individuals requesting money to clear a warrant. According to the local Better Business Bureau office, several other law enforcement agencies across the state have had the same issue with this scam. If you are a victim of this type of scam, be sure to report it to Crime Check at 509-456-2233. http://www.fcc.gov/guides/caller-id-and-spoofing Bicycle Contact Produces Arrests for Warrants/Drugs - On a Wednesday night in early August, just before 11:30 p.m., Spokane Valley Sheriff's Corporal J. Shover contacted a male and a female who were riding bicycles along Sprague Avenue at University Road. Neither of the riders had visible lights to help illuminate them to traffic. Corporal Shover contacted the bicyclists and after checking Page 4 their names with dispatch, he was informed both had confirmed active warrants for their arrest. The 48-year-old female was arrested for a felony Department of Corrections Escape Community Custody warrant. During a search of the female, Corporal Shover located a small baggie containing a white crystal substance believed to be Methamphetamine in the right front coin pocket of her shorts. She immediately denied the substance was hers and stated"someone"must have given it to her without her knowledge. The 21-year-old male was arrested for a misdemeanor warrant for Violation of a Court Order. Both were transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for their warrants. The female suspect was also booked for an additional Felony charge of Possession of a Control Substance, Methamphetamine. The substance found on the female was tested and showed a presumptive positive reading for Methamphetamine. Running and Grabbing for a Cell Phone,Not Safe— On an early August morning, at approximately 03:54 a.m., Spokane Valley Sheriff's Deputy Jeff Thurman observed a white 1996 Ford SUV driving across the centerline of the roadway as it travelled westbound on Sprague in the area of Conklin Road. As he turned around to investigate the driver for possibly being impaired, the 36-year-old male driver of the vehicle, accelerated. Deputy Thurman activated his emergency lights as the vehicle continued westbound. Suddenly, the male swerved into the Fred Meyer parking lot, stopped at the gas pumps, jumped out of the vehicle and walked approximately 20 feet in front of his vehicle. Deputy Thurman gave multiple commands for the male suspect to return to the vehicle, but he began jumping up and down, swinging his arms and acting very excited. Believing the male suspect was under the influence of a controlled substance and not knowing if he was armed, Deputy Thurman asked for additional units to assist. Suddenly, the male suspect started running southbound across all four lanes of travel on Sprague Avenue into a very dark area, at which time Deputy Thurman, with his K9 partner Laslo on lead, gave chase. Deputy Thurman yelled multiple times at the male suspect to stop, that he was under arrest, and that Laslo would be deployed if he didn't stop, but the male suspect continued to run. During the chase, Deputy Thurman observed the male suspect reach into his waistband multiple times before falling on the ground in an extremely dark area south of Dairy Queen. Instead of staying on the ground and complying with Deputy Thurman's commands, the male suspect attempted to get back up, but slipped and fell back down to the ground. The male suspect again started to get back up onto a knee and began reaching into his right waistband with his right hand. Deputy Thurman observed the base of a black object, which appeared to possibly be the butt of a pistol, in the male suspect's hand as he continued to disregard commands to lie down on his stomach. Deputy Thurman dropped his lead and deployed K9 Laslo while he drew his firearm. K9 Laslo made contact with the male suspect and he immediately threw the object out of his hand, put his hands at his side and laid on his stomach yelling "Okay, okay I give up." Deputy Thurman immediately took control of Laslo and the male suspect was taken into custody when additional units arrived. The object the male suspect threw was determined to be a dark-colored cell phone. When asked, the male said he ran because his driver's license was suspended and he had a warrant for his arrest. He admitted to using methamphetamine a few hours prior to the stop and was feeling the effects. When Deputy Thurman explained he thought the male suspect was reaching for a weapon, the male explained he was very sorry and that he just had his cell phone and was trying to pull his pants up. During a search of the male suspect's vehicle, a baggie containing a white crystalline substance was located in a blue case, which was tested and it presumptively tested positive for methamphetamine. After receiving medical attention for a small puncture wound, the male suspect was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for Felony Possession of a Controlled Substance, Methamphetamine, misdemeanor charges of Resisting Arrest and Driving While Suspended and an active misdemeanor warrant for Driving While Suspended. Page 5 Domestic Dispute Turns Fatal - On a Sunday in mid-August, at 5:00 p.m., Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputies responded to the 15600 block of East 4th Ave. on a Domestic Violence call. The complainant told 911 she and her 27-year-old husband had some type of dispute, he was armed with a weapon and that he was threatening suicide. With this information, deputies made certain that the female caller and her three children were safely out of the apartment. Deputies then contacted other tenants in the area to ensure their safety. Deputies attempted to contact the suspect unsuccessfully. With information he was possibly armed, the Sheriffs Office SWAT Team and Hostage Negotiators were utilized as they have specialized training dealing with barricaded subjects. After several unsuccessful attempts contacting the suspect, the decision was made to enter the apartment using a robot. The robot did locate the male deceased inside the apartment at approximately 10:00 p.m. Sheriffs Office Major Crimes Detectives are investigating the incident. Sex Offender Information Bulletin-Notification of Release Level III Offender - The Spokane County Sheriffs Office is releasing the following information pursuant to RCW 4.24.550, which authorizes law enforcement - agencies to inform the public of a sex offender release when, in the discretion of the agency, the release of information will enhance public safety and protection. The individuals who appear on such notifications have been convicted of a sex offense that requires registration with the Sheriffs Office in the county of their residence. Further, their previous criminal history places them in a classification level which reflects the potential to reoffend. This individual has served the sentence imposed on them by the courts. HE IS NOT WANTED BY THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AT THIS TIME. THIS NOTIFICATION IS NOT INTENDED TO INCREASE FEAR; RATHER IT IS OUR BELIEF THAT AN INFORMED PUBLIC IS A SAFER PUBLIC. Law Enforcement has no legal authority to direct where a sex offender may or may not live. Unless court ordered restrictions exist, this offender is constitutionally free to live wherever he chooses. NAME: James Broady Artis Black Male, age 46 years, Black hair, Brown eyes Residence: 5800th block of E 4TH, SPOKANE VALLEY Conviction(s)-Date & Crime: Sep 15, 1991 Indecent liberties. For more information, tips and alerts please go to our OffenderWatch®page at: http://www.sheriffalerts.com/cap main.php?office=54488 If you have any questions about our community awareness program, please call: 509-477-6609 or e- mail administrator at rgriffey a s okanesheriff.org. Spokane Valley Shooting Investigation - On a Sunday morning in mid-August, at about 3:15 a.m., Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputies responded to the 11600 block of E. Empire Way on a shooting call. Deputies arrived on scene and learned a 22-year-old male victim had been driven by private vehicle to a local hospital. Deputy David Lawhorn contacted two adult females at the hospital who gave the victim a ride. One of the females told Deputy Lawhorn the 22-year-old victim and 42-year-old male suspect had been drinking and arguing through the evening. She said the victim and suspect were outside the residence when she heard what she thought was one gun shot. She went outside to find the victim on his hands and knees injured from a gunshot wound to his neck. Spokane County Major Page 6 Crimes Detectives are investigating the shooting. At this point there have been no arrests. The victim was last listed in stable condition at a local hospital. Six Honda Accord's Stolen — In a single day in mid-August, six stolen vehicle reports and one attempted vehicle theft were reported in Spokane Valley. Five Honda Accords and one Integra were stolen. There was also one attempted theft of a Honda Civic reported. Three of the vehicles were stolen from the Valley Mall parking lot. One was stolen from the Costco parking lot at 5601 E. Sprague and there was an attempted theft at the Home Depot parking lot at 5617 E. Sprague. Additionally, one of the other thefts occurred near the 8100 block of E. Appleway and the sixth was taken from the area of 1900 S. St. Charles Rd. Citizens are reminded to please take their valuables out of their vehicle whether it is brief cases, electronics, navigation systems or anything else of value. You can view several safety tips regarding preventing vehicle prowling on Neighborhood Watch website located on the Sheriffs Office web page http://www.spokanecounty.org/sheriff/. Also, Crime Stoppers is offering a cash reward with anyone providing information leading to an arrest in this string of vehicle thefts. Persons with information regarding these vehicle thefts should call the Crime Stoppers Tip Line at 1-800-222-TIPS, or should forward the tip via the Internet website www.crimestoppersinlandnorthwest.org. Tipsters do not have to give their name to collect the cash reward. Crime Stoppers of the Inland Northwest is a civilian organization that promotes public safety by paying cash rewards for information that solves crimes. It is not affiliated with law enforcement. Suspicious Person — On an afternoon in mid-August, a 26-year-old female was traveling west on Sprague from Pines. The victim said she noticed a white male driving a newer, white, four-door Dodge truck with a canopy, traveling next to her on Sprague. She said she had a strange feeling about the man because he kept looking inside her vehicle staring at her. The victim said she was on her way to the daycare at the old University High School, located at 10304 E. 9th. She said she saw the male was pulling into the parking lot behind her and thought he may be picking up a grandchild from daycare. Before she could exit her vehicle, the male contacted her at the driver's side door of her vehicle and told her she had no brake lights. The victim said the suspect was a white male, in his late 50's to early 60's, had grayish-blond, balding hair and was wearing a red dress shirt and blue jeans. She said the suspect bent over onto the floorboard, pushed her brake pedal down and looked up her skirt. She said this continued for a minute or two before he left in his truck. The victim had no problems with her brake lights. Anyone who may have witnessed this incident is asked to call Crime Check at 509-456-2233. Brothers Arrested For Multiple Felonies — In late August, Spokane Valley Property Crimes Detectives and Post Falls Detectives served a search warrant at a residence near the 6100 block of E. 15th Ave. in Spokane Valley. This was the result of a three-month investigation that dealt with stores in Spokane Valley, Post Falls, Spokane City and Airway Heights. Several stores in the area, such as Wal-Mart, Kohl's and Fred Meyer, had fallen victim to the brothers' crime spree. On that date, three adult brothers, ages 18, 24 and 25 years, along with their juvenile brother were taken into custody at their residence for multiple felony charges that include trafficking in stolen property, theft with intent to resell, burglary and possession of a controlled substance. Through the investigation of 15 separate cases, detectives learned the brothers would steal such items as high-end vacuum cleaners, carpet cleaners, sewing machines and air conditioning units, and then resell them on Craigslist. All the brothers were booked into the Spokane County Jail and Juvenile Detention for the listed charges. The investigation is on-going and additional arrests are expected. Page 7 Tire Thieves Arrested - On a Saturday in late August, 36 vehicle tires were stolen from Appleway Auto Nation on East Sprague Ave. in Spokane Valley. On the following Monday, Spokane Valley Property Crimes Detectives and patrol deputies responded to Clark's Automotive, located at 16010 E. Sprague, on a suspicious persons call. An employee from Clark's said that two suspects,both 44 years old, were trying to sell tires to the business. Through their investigation, Spokane Valley deputies and detectives discovered the tires were those stolen from Appleway Auto Nation earlier in the week. Eleven of the stolen tires were recovered at Clark's. Additionally, they learned other tires were at a residence located at a residence in the 1500 block of S. University Road in Spokane Valley. Spokane Valley Property Crimes Detectives later served a search warrant at that residence where a 45-year-old male was taken into custody without incident. Detectives located 14 additional stolen tires as well as methamphetamine at the residence. The two 44-year-old males were booked into the Spokane County Jail on the charges of Possession of Stolen Property and Trafficking in Stolen Property. The 45-year- old male was booked into jail on the charges of Possession of Stolen Property and Possession of a Controlled Substance. Burglar Mistakes Garage For Safeway - On a Wednesday in late August, Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputy G. Snyder responded to the 15200 block of East 22nd Ct. on a residential burglary call. Deputy Snyder contacted the homeowner who told him he had been outside and went into his residence for a moment. He said when he came back out into his garage he found a man standing next to his refrigerator inside his garage. The homeowner asked the man, who he said was about 6', blonde hair and a light build, what he was doing. He told the homeowner he was looking for Safeway. The homeowner politely told the suspect there was not a Safeway inside his garage. The suspect walked to a white Toyota truck that he had backed into the homeowner's driveway and fled the scene. The homeowner followed the vehicle and wrote down the license plate number. He last saw the truck driving west on Sprague from Sullivan. Deputy Snyder checked the license plate and it returned stolen. Anyone with information possibly identifying this suspect is asked to call Crime Check at 509- 456-2233. *************** Page 8 2013 AUGUST CRIME REPORT To date: Yearly totals Aug-13 Aug-12 2013 2012 2,012 2,011 2,010 2009 2008 2007 BURGLARY 103 87 707 636 1062 1027 936 725 753 584 FORGERY 43 82 565 473 826 593 341 297 354 365 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 163 171 1101 1158 1770 1566 1183 1245 893 1,265 NON-CRIMINAL 8 7 69 75 108 160 917 892 944 839 PROPERTY OTHER 132 124 990 731 1236 1126 837 933 828 890 RECOVERED VEHICLES 54 32 384 271 446 416 365 187 319 343 STOLEN VEHICLES 56 37 419 342 586 566 496 298 496 478 THEFT 248 257 1969 1749 2636 2512 2365 2162 1,846 1,881 VEHICLE OTHER 26 34 200 175 287 195 3 5 7 3 VEHICLE PROWLING 97 157 755 720 1165 1491 1395 920 1069 682 TOTAL PROPERTY CRIMES 930 989 7,159 6,535 10,328 9,615 8,852 7,668 7,513 7,338 ASSAULT 76 75 633 660 936 963 895 927 869 853 DOA/SUICIDE 18 8 157 163 256 213 188 210 269 221 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 60 67 441 391 600 714 1297 1226 1063 874 HOMICIDE 0 0 0 2 2 3 1 3 3 1 KIDNAP 2 0 14 10 17 15 16 21 16 23 MENTAL 16 27 182 193 270 253 289 310 360 350 MP 13 11 108 89 154 125 128 115 95 83 PERSONS OTHER 300 286 2217 2098 3112 2484 1692 1621 1,354 1,337 ROBBERY 8 9 70 57 79 98 68 75 71 60 TELEPHONE HARASSMENT 12 20 108 136 212 162 153 159 95 73 TOTAL MAJOR CRIMES 505 503 3930 3799 5638 4997 4727 4,667 4,195 3,875 ADULT RAPE 5 5 50 60 89 67 44 35 44 43 CHILD ABUSE 2 2 17 17 27 89 115 159 148 104 CUSTODIAL INTERFERENCE 23 20 147 120 190 184 206 157 86 92 SEX REGISTRATION 1 0 1 6 8 2 1 2 3 4 INDECENT LIBERTIES 2 4 14 16 27 17 8 10 11 18 RAPE/CHILD 2 2 9 12 13 23 28 35 39 31 RUNAWAY 34 31 286 399 530 510 490 440 369 295 SEX OTHER 0 4 26 28 38 56 215 211 179 194 STALKING 2 0 18 18 24 19 18 15 21 17 SUSPICIOUS PERSON 31 33 284 284 424 341 215 175 142 152 TOTAL SEX CRIMES 102 101 852 960 1370 1294 1387 1271 1,108 996 TOTAL ITF 26 30 224 276 430 521 542 671 838 808 TOTAL TRAFFIC REPORTS 257 326 2439 2600 3957 3569 3081 3,183 3,811 3,800 TOTAL REPORTS RECEIVED 1,820 1,949 14,604 14,170 21,723 19,996 18,589 17,460 17,465 16,817 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 Charge Count from Tickets: Spokane Valley JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC o 2011 2012 —C1-2013 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Spokane Valley Dispatched Calls JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -0-2011 -2012 -F 2013 ►Z • • • • • • JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -0-2011 -2012 -F 2013 300 250 200 150 100 50 SPOKANE VALLEY TRAFFIC COLLISIONS JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC O 2011 -2012 -0-2013 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Spokane Valley Person Crimes JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC X2011 X2012 t 2013 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Spokane Valley Property Crimes JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -0-2011 -2012 2013 • �I • • • • JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -0-2011 -2012 2013 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 Spokane Valley Self Initiated Incidents JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -0-2011 -2012 -F 2013 Spokane Valley Sex Crimes JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC X2011 X2012 -F 2013 • • • • ■ • ♦ I JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC X2011 X2012 -F 2013 ir�el� F.r.Agiww..- 1...,...fir a■.0.z ■wc=- midair.- :=Ymia � �1. • . •=r &N Z -=W - =ter d'Q357t —g1:-I:=MM: :ia:roll1111iiY :W M= Qem ents San a�ay T% oa a Gres 0 Wabash er Fruit Hill Sanson n arland Gran ite fly 31111WINEFETWE vow erick 1i Wl am:ga go Nliniii n11I1.■ 1:: mummEKJ map IMEN .� -1�0 an•.n Q'uecro IF 40 A owir. firs 51. mC!E \"I . ;Pi= insm 1=rl1l�■ • w nom r Era ma �T "sa_mue•_■=E � ••�■an■M IYI..i• �A■� �� 1 ., L^�,,��71fiI .�1r{l:1..■s� m^mi+ .rnmel.- MO.IMOPM ■ii�lllli• .INEuIM • IIM∎ .MM ul••■ .=nrr••>• ate== _NWT:W=1E11 muS:1f11- «r deo R11. 1�. 57th • Ill MIN Broadway ■- 411 t• gO �JIL 4 Spokan an Lacross Indu tn. ►kA EINEM NENE blY • vie iett P° T J alley iimmum : I� �WNW NM rCIIMIN �!4 ,rr..v s':CM in11E7== Ma►..l••■T �gI.-- ��-=a, _ ∎-_�=w 11•=-M ring ton APPIewaay I8th Ci Ech o le s- 3 +n 25th us th w ennie q, 10 Fn'O�h 1.� GIYY�� asnimpil w x RI �� u e ' wo at..�►IIEL ...`met m��[@L!!!. go• M issi one �.�=Pff ��Catald M 11°- 11111 41) aiAmi nom innonnir -111.11Nrar` onwis11in_rl---1+ • -,� m 5l WPM I,! �iramii21 � �....,. �yl'�IL�II,�iI�_I��i_�F� � wrr�� ■ �J �� Sa •��R7 � w!S•i �'4a� J h 8th � �� W,.41 116-1 1a.mis ro ! � i dp; �_r..■1=iptis awl -:4 omgraziksreiraleld• aI--n■ -- 11111 ge®e Terre e y an I st nd owy1ew 9 YQ V 3 - E t�3 Commercial Burglaries O 2 Low Medium High 0 0.5 I: Miles 2013 August Commercial Burglary Hotspots I I Map Produced: 70,- 1 1 Sep 2013 ` 7 Clem ents San a�ay 5unfl o'd e F c\� O G Rub 0 F T� �1 Fruit Hill 5anson n RIWI% ri Iles! Oly 1�i� FEE Mit E` IG - oa a Crest Gran ite • ■NW . - —R—ar �__r.--- —tea Y © 7; i�ll�p Quuecro n ck 4 an Lacr ss, Indu tn. ►kA y ME Mr ■I■■R1 .111■ RBIPark a P�- T M -ME in •■ it=PAS MMENIF r==--mawaEt 1IM_Mg • YW■■i■ q i�1►31'1■■■S Emma= ■1a>ara Naftali" � E ••∎•••1mm = mm11■.■= _= Oem ents San a�ay I�" �, I!a� T� Spokane Valley 5anson Fruit Hill Wabash n arland oa a Gres Granite •4, iT�i�7a11% Oly 31n1V -ir. Long�� .�T�rRlll 1■ILt_ ■■ raj'• 1,0 Lacross= Indu 1t�n.�.��.��••►•Ik��A �1711[II�I�3y 111111 PE Park E ry Iles! N° T • i BSI MILL llCi ■M... ■MI al1C=! 4114DAC1111I RIRIE 72i1 ran • Oem ents San Mandalay IFF37.ai • r1 o° a Crest Fruit H ill Wabash ^• :M 8 � ` t Wi �� e .1261 11 " �. r Ilama� l ac%-1-1% � s San on p TCenti Aida! Granite c os se arland dp erick !Sumo, I�r�Q 1■ I4d1■L MUM ZEE= !EMME■ 1111 MUM ULU= I��w�a3l��II ,. al.loM •.�YIL•'.;:.Ir IMMINFIg I=CM. l=.L1..1■ :mss} �� • lr■M l.�w e I■"14W,. 1lmiTi77 IfT!TAME MEM.. ■■■w.Alr 1lLalLIM= �ua ! ■�LLLuqW�1! ■�a:u�.rtra>aw ■KM •.=• ■IPJEih�! •==1� dp m1= p M ��: Ram g lutm S im • c o F��' sift G� � 1�L91��1aJ � �l1I�IIf11l111� antwypine .oa �lo! FIl�FJ■_■a �C�.intr-U Kno Mon a.• ery 1 90 _Mis io �' � '' ■■nt r7 K team m "1E i mmxParling Errilms, pma mow j t» a rim csionlIts a auglidai vQ mairem rtlwr � �nEri , On 2!I st- 0 u d •. .�inft(FM 111 o � . Proir- Man sfie 4 Spokan Indiana •gam..!` IZ ..-- ©•---� ,M!!! =!!! �_!!7!! _ 7 "P,- e°17,e 25th 18th c�. MIN 11=11 ei 110=92 rew1w- e WILE itiligileVermilrang= w o■■a1 wzfra�'+'�+ Q -r Eli `mahrorm! __hot= Amu d 10 th ie Co, RA? Y al Park E M issi Eu e- 0 Riyer" . attan 1�Mrt 0t Catald• I iberty Lake Ad Nam/gni-1T Belle Terre h•i h 8th 3 S I2 - (7 1st nd oWVI eW Traffic Collisions c 1 O 2 C 3 Low Medium Low - Medium _ High 0 0.5 I Miles I I I 2013 August Traffic Collision Hotspots Map Produced: I 1 Sep 2013 Oem ents andalay O G Ruby, Ner Y 0 Wabash er Fruit Hill 5anson n T� Iles! aint� _ - al IIF� r�r� �� it arland • i 2013 AUGUST CRIMES BY CITIES (Only crimes handled by Spokane County Sheriff's Office 8/13 Correction) 9/10/2013 AH CH DP FC FF LAH LL ML MW RF SCO SPA SPK SV WAV Total BURGLARY 6 0 3 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 82 0 2 103 0 200 FORGERY 3 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 32 0 0 43 0 86 MAL MISCHIEF 5 0 9 0 0 0 3 2 3 2 134 0 5 163 0 326 NON-CRIMINAL 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 6 0 0 8 0 19 PROP OTHER 26 0 7 2 0 1 10 4 0 1 63 0 21 132 0 267 RCRVD VEH 7 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 23 0 5 54 0 91 STL VEH 8 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 29 0 5 56 0 103 THEFT 18 0 11 1 0 1 9 1 4 0 124 1 4 248 0 422 VEH OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 15 0 0 26 0 42 VEH PROWL 9 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 3 0 111 0 2 97 0 227 TOTAL PROPERTY CRIMES 83 0 37 3 2 2 33 10 16 3 619 1 44 930 0 1,783 ASSAULT 3 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 42 0 8 76 1 135 DOA/SUICIDE 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 13 0 1 18 0 37 DV 15 0 2 0 0 0 1 5 0 1 58 0 2 60 0 144 HOMICIDE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 KIDNAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 0 5 MENTAL 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 19 0 0 16 0 42 MP 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 13 0 33 PERS OTHER 11 0 20 1 0 1 15 7 8 2 214 0 25 300 0 604 ROBBERY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 8 0 10 1'F;L-HARASS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 1 12 0 31 TOTAL MAJOR CRIMES 34 0 30 1 0 1 18 14 9 3 387 0 39 505 1 1,042 ADULT RAPE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 2 5 0 13 CHILD ABUSE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 3 CUST INTFER 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 23 0 41 SEX REGIS F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 IND LIBERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 5 RAPE/CHILD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 5 RUNAWAY 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 28 0 1 34 0 70 SEX OTHER 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 9 STALKING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 3 SUSP PERSON 5 0 0 0 0 0 7 2 0 1 21 0 5 31 0 72 TOTAL SEX CRIMES 7 0 5 0 0 0 7 5 2 1 79 1 13 102 1 223 TOTAL ITF 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 8 0 6 26 0 44 TOTAL TRAFFIC 15 0 10 0 0 0 5 4 6 0 165 0 41 257 0 503 TOTAL REPORTS RECEIVED 140 0 84 4 2 3 64 33 33 7 1,258 2 143 1,820 2 3,595 9/10/2013 2013 August INCIDENTS BY CITIES (Only incidents handled by Spokane County Sheriff's Office) 4 AH CH DP FC FF LAH LL ML MW RF SCO SPA SPK SV WAV TOTALS CAD INCIDENTS 16 136 272 27 4 7 14 148 82 21 3,780 4 504 5,211 1 10,227 SELF INITIATED INCIDENTS 14 12 130 4 1 1 5 83 33 7 1,259 2 431 1,682 0 3,664 DRUG SELF INT (PATROL) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 TRAFFIC STOPS 5 6 40 0 1 0 4 24 24 2 648 0 242 951 0 1,947 TRAFFIC STOPS (ARST/CIT/IN) 1 2 11 0 0 0 1 8 8 0 234 0 100 478 0 843 TS (WARRANTS) 25 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 7 13 0 50 CALLS FOR SERVICE 2 124 142 23 3 6 9 65 49 14 2,521 2 73 3,529 1 6,563 ALARMS 1 1 7 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 125 0 0 98 0 238 ACCIDENTS 0 6 2 0 0 0 1 3 3 0 157 0 10 168 0 350 ACCIDENTS (ARREST/CIT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 14 0 18 DRUG CALLS 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 8 0 0 51 0 62 DV 17 0 10 0 0 0 1 7 1 2 121 0 11 180 0 350 DUI 0 1 2 1 0 0 2 0 3 0 118 0 5 88 0 220 DUI (ARREST) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 26 0 32 PURSUITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY 0 12 27 1 0 0 1 17 13 1 439 0 31 604 0 1,146 VEHICLE RECOVERED 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 1 31 0 57 911 ABANDON LINE 0 34 5 14 1 1 0 5 6 1 209 0 9 306 0 591 SHOPLIFTING 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 25 ALL ARRESTS (ARREST/CIT/IN) 13 134 251 24 4 7 13 133 74 20 3,454 4 385 4,499 1 9,016 CRIME CHECK REPORTS 2 0 28 1 0 1 2 9 20 3 621 1 9 759 0 1,456 9/12/2013 Spokane Walley'- PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT August 2013 AGREEMENTS FOR SERVICES ADOPTED AND IN OPERATION Contract Total %of Contract Name Contractor Expended as Contract Amount of 8/31/13 Expended Street Maintenance Poe Asphalt $1,366,663.00 $889,661.28 65.10% Street Sweeping AAA Sweeping $490,199.94 $336,074.98 68.56% Storm Drain Cleaning AAA Sweeping $189,990.00 $146,094.71 76.90% Snow Removal Poe Asphalt $140,000.00 $36,897.14 26.36% Landscaping Ace Landscaping $90,803.72 $53,958.05 59.42% Emergency Traffic Control Senske $10,000.00 $4,511.24 45.11% Litter and Weed Control Geiger Work Crew $60,000.00* $40,746.75 67.91% State Highway Maintenance WSDOT $215,000.00 $98,386.26 45.76% Traffic Signals, Signs,Striping Spokane County $632,000.00 $267,599.21** 42.34% Dead Animal Control Brad Southard $15,000.00* $10,159.00 67.73! **Total does not include August 2093. * Budget estimates Citizen Requests for Public Works 60 --- 50 in a 40 — z 6 cc 30 — c ar +Nt 20 -- u - 1 10 — l- 0 _ LI J ■ �l l ♦ I ■ ! L � �. Ir Li Total Landsca Citizen ping Dead Roadwa Pothole Sign& Misc. Traffic Requests Right-of- Animal y Hazard Requests Signal Graffiti Requests Requests : Public was Removal Requests Works y ■Submitted 57 6 5 8 11 6 1 3 17 ■In Progress 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l i Resolved 56 I 5 5 8 11 6 1 3 17 "Information in bold indicates updates 1 WASTEWATER Status of the process can be monitored at: http://www.spokaneriver.net/, http://www.ecy.wa,gov/programs/wgftmdl/spokaneriver/dissolved oxygen/status.html, http://www,spokanecounty.org/utilities/WaterReclamation/content.aspx?c-2224 and http://www.spokaneriverpartners.com/ REGIONAL SOLID WASTE SYSTEM Staff attended regional strategy meetings with Spokane County and City of Spokane regarding development of an RPP to solicit proposals from consultants to evaluate alternatives for solid waste management and disposal. The selection committee recommended HDR's proposal. The County Commissioners approved the contract with HDR and the contract was signed on May 20, A kickoff meeting is scheduled for June 5, The 2-day kickoff mtg was held with HDR on June 4th and 5th, which included site visits to all of the facilities. HDR is in the process of collecting data and developing cost alternatives for the various regional options. They expect to complete these cost models in late July for the project team to review and discuss, HDR completed the final draft of the study on August 21st, and presented the results of the study to the elected officials representing the jurisdictions who are parties to the regional system, at CenterPlace on August 28tr, PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN A contract was executed with IMS to prepare the 2013 update to the Pavement Management Plan. A draft report was received and staff is in the process of reviewing it. CAPITAL PROJECTS (See attached Capital Projects Spreadsheet) STREET MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY The following is a summary of Public Works/Contractor maintenance activities in the City of Spokane Valley for August 2013: O Pothole patching / Shouldering O Igoe asphalt performed patch work O Poe subcontractors completed stormwater repairs O The Geiger crew continues with garbage pickup on arterials and dryland grass vegetation management • AAA Sweeping continues sweeping arterial roadways and vectoring drywells and catch basins STORMWATER UTILITY ® Stormwater Small Works projects Repair, replace or improve problems on the stormwater list. Design Continued. O Dettman/Dickey Stormdrain Improvements Project Substantial Completion 20 AUG 2013. See Project#0189. O 14th Avenue Custer to Carnahan Rids were received 16 AUG 2013 and a notice of award was sent to the apparent low bidder, Dig Sky Development, Inc. for $2.97,154.00. See Project#0190. *Information in bold indicates updates 2 TRAFFIC • Development Projects Reviewing traffic impact studies for several projects and assisting Development Engineering with preparation of a Certified Site Program. • I-90 Business Route Expect installation of the 1-90 Business Route signs in late summer or early fall. We are checking with WSDOT again on the schedule. GRANT APPLICATIONS New Call for Projects • TIB Call for Projects Staff submitted TIB grant applications for the following three projects which were approved by council on July 30: Broadway Ave Improvement-- Flora to Barker 32" Ave Sidewalk--SR 27 to Evergreen Indiana Ave Sidewalk— Pines (SR 27) to Indiana Results will be known by late November. • WUTC Grade Crossing Protective Fund Grant Staff prepared and submitted a grant application to the WUTC for a Grade Crossing Protective Fund Grant for a barrier curb at the VistalTrent/BNSF railroad crossing. • 2012 Supplemental Statewide Stormwater Grants The State Department of Ecology announced $7.OMJstatewide from previous grant offers that were declined or de-obligated. Grant applications are due June 14 and if awarded, projects would need to be completed by June 30, 2015. Staff submitted applications for projects that are in the Council approved Stormwater CIP. The projects are: Broadway, Havana to Fancher Stormdrain Retrofits and SE Yardley Stormdrain Retrofits. Staff was notified August 2 that the City is eligible to receive 75% match of up to $1M for the SE Yardley Stormdrain Retrofits Project. The Broadway project ranked 2 projects lower than the funding cutoff point. • FY2013 NPDES Phase Ill/ Capacity Grants o NPDES Implementation/Management: The State Department of Ecology informed staff that the City is eligible to receive $50,000 to assist with the implementation and management of the City's NPDES Municipal Stormwater Permit. Funding agreement will be forthcoming. o Preconstruction Task The State Department of Ecology informed staff that the City is eligible to receive up to $120,000 for planning and designing project-specific stormwater flow control and/or treatment facilities by August 2014. Funding agreement will be forthcoming. {Information in bold indicates updates 3 Spwtokajne Public Works Projects Valley. Monthly Summary August-2013 Design &Construction Estimated Total Project Design&Construction Projects Funding Proposed %Complete Construction Project it Bid Date PE I CN Completion Cost Street Projects 0155 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement H4508 FHWA-BR 12/01/13 90 0 12/31/15 $ 1,000,000 0156 Mansfield Ave Connection FHWA-CMAQ 03/01/14 40 0 12/31/14 $ 1,976,800 0166 Pines Rd.(SR27)&Grace Ave.Int Safety HSIP 04/01/14 10 0 10/31/14 $ 671,050 0175 Sullivan UP Tracks UC(SB)Resurfacing P FHWA-BR 06/07/13 100 75 09/30/13 $ 286,142 0186 Adams Road Resurfacing Project CDBG 01/31/14 0 0 06/30/14 $ 183,710 Street Preservation Projects 0179 2013 Street Preservation Ph2 FHWA-STP(U) 08/09/13 100 0 08/15/14 $ 1,522,400 0180 2013 Street Preservation Phi COSV 08/02/13 100 0 10/15/13 $ 1,420,934 0187 Sprague Ave Preservation Project FHWA-STP(U) 02/01/14 0 0 08/31/14 $ 1,193,614 Traffic Projects 0060 Argonne Road Corridor Upgrade(SRTC 06.3 FHWA-CMAQ 01/31/14 95 0 08/31/14 $ 1,290,636 0167 Citywide Safety Improvements HSIP 09/01/13 60 0 06/30/15 $ 474,580 0181 Citywide Traffic Sign Upgrade HSIP 08/01/13 100 2 03/31/14 $ 200,000 Stormwater Projects 0150 Sullivan Rd Bridge Drain Retrofit Dept of Ecology 07/26/13 100 0 10/31/13 $ 237,375 0173 Spokane Valley Regional Decant Facility Dept of Ecology 05/24/13 90 95 12/31/13 $ 885,000 0182 2013 Street Presery-Ph 2-Stormwater COSV 08/09/13 100 0 08/15/14 TBD 0183 2013 Street Presery-Ph 3-Stormwater COSV 08/02/13 100 0 10/15/13 TBD 0190 14th Avenue Custer to Carnahan COSV 08/02/13 100 0 12/31/13 $ 306,217 Other Projects 0149 Sidewalk Infill FHWA-CMAQ 02/14/14 80 50 06/30/14 $ 1,139,955 0168 Wellesley Ave s'walk&Adams Rd s'walk SafeRoutes-State 08/02/13 100 0 10/30/13 $ 808,565 0169 Argonne/Mullah Safety Indiana-Broadway HSIP 07/01/13 100 5 10/01/13 $ 111,750 0170 Argonne Road;Empire Ave-Knox Ave HSIP 07/01/13 100 5 10/01/13 $ 180,640 Design only Design Estimated Total Project Design Only Projects Funding Complete %Complete Construction Project # Date PE , Completion Cost Street Projects 0123 Mission Ave-Flora to Barker FHWA-STP(U) 09/30/14 5 $ 517,919 0141 Sullivan&Euclid PCC FHWA-STP(U) 04/15/14 20 $ 175,260 0142 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullin FHWA-STP(U) 11/30/13 85 $ 276,301 0188 Sullivan Rd Preservation Project FHWA-STP(U) 04/01/15 0 $ 1,156,500 Traffic Projects 0159 University Road Overpass Study FHWA-CMAQ 12/01/13 55 $ 249,711 0177 Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study FHWA-STP(U) 03/01/14 8 $ 200,000 Stormwater Projects 0185 Appleway landscaping-Phase 1 COSV 10/30/13 60 $ 18,000 Other Projects 0145 Spokane Valley-Millwood Trail FHWA-STP(E) 02/15/14 0 $ 745,000 0176 Appleway Trail COSY 10/31/13 30 $ 150,000 Spokane Valley Planning Commission APPROVED Minutes Council Chambers — City Hall, 11707 E. Sprague Ave, August S, 2013 I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Bates called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m, II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance III. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS Present Absent CITY STAFF Bill Bates-Chair x i- John Hohman, Community Development Director Joe Stoy—Vice Chair x r Mike Basinger, Senior Planner Steven Neill x Christina Janssen,Planner Kevin Anderson x Cary Driskell, City Attorney Mike Phillips x Robert McCaslin x Christina Carlsen x Cari Hinshaw, Secretary IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Commissioner Stoy moved to approve the agenda as presented, a second was nrade and the motion passed unanimously. V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Neill moved to approve the July 25, 2013 minutes as presented, a second was made and the motion was passed unanimously. VI. COMMISSION REPORTS; Commissioner Bates reported that he attended the last Council meeting and stated there was a great presentation in regards to Balfour Park and Library. He stated that it was the first time he had seen the plans for the park and it will be a very nice addition to our City. Chair Bates also attended some of the National Flight Out Against Crime parties. He stated that there were forty-five neighborhood parties thr u out the County, with the Fire Department, Police Chief and deputies attending party to party. Planning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 8 VII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Conununity Development Director John Holunan stated that there would be a new version of the advance agenda drawn up, Previously it was anticipated to be ready for a Public Hearing on the Shoreline development regulations for August 22. He stated that they are not prepared enough for that and it would be sometime in September. Staff spent a lot of time this week trying to fit all the pieces together with a real concerted effort on looking at the critical area regulations and how it fits in with the development regulations. VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no public comment IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS: A. New Business: Industrial Land Inventory Analysis Senior Planner Mike Basinger provided an overview on the Industrial Land Inventory, which is an assessment of the industrial property supply for the City of Spokane Valley. The purpose of the industrial property inventory is to provide an up-to-date understanding of the characteristics, practicality, and deficiencies of industrial properties. Commissioner Stoy stated that on the map that Mr. Basinger provided there is a critical area, he asked Mr. Basinger to explain that. Mr. Basinger stated that it's a wetland and that we have wetlands in our jurisdiction that haven't gone th u a process where they have been identified as a wetland. Mr. Basinger excluded that portion of the industrial property from the analysis. X, PUBLIC HEARING: CTA-2013-0006 Privately Initiated Code Text Amendment, SVMC Chapter 19.120, to allow Specialized TraininWLearning Studios as a Permitted Use in the I-1 zone and a Conditional use in the I-2 zone. Chair Bates opened the Public Hearing at 6:11 PM, Planner Christina Janssen provided a brief overview of CTA-2013-0006, Ms. Janssen informed Commissioners how the City Council allowed indoor recreational and entertainment facilities in the Light and Heavy Industrial zones as a permitted use. Ms. Janssen explained the difference between this use and the entertainment recreation facility. The recreational and entertainment uses would be a bowling alley or indoor soccer center, where individuals would go to recreate at their own leisure. Specialized training and learning schools deal with instruction have a teaching staff and participate in classes. Ms. Janssen explained that Spokane Valley Municipal Code, Section 17.80. 150(f) outlines two criteria that must be met in order to approve the amendment: 1. The proposed amendment needs to be consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive plan. 2. The amendment must bear a substantial relationship with the public health safety and welfare, Ms. Janssen went over the approval criteria, Chapter 2-Land use, Light and Heavy Industry. She stated in the application that was submitted the applicant called out four goals from the Comprehensive Plan to support their application: 1, LUG-14-Improve the appearance and function of the built environment. Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 8 2, EDG-1- Encourage diverse and mutually supportive business development and the expansion and retention of existing businesses within the City for the purpose of emphasizing economic vitality, stability and sustainability. 3. EDG-2- Encourage redevelopment of commercial/industrial properties within the City. 4. EDG-1-Encourage regional tourism as a sustainable provider of jobs and markets Following the application being submitted to the City, staff as well did an analysis of the CompPlan. Following are the goals and policies that staff found to be applicable to this application: 1. LUG-10-Provide for the development of well-planned industrial areas and ensure the long-term holding of appropriate land in parcel sizes adequate to allow for fixture development as industrial uses. 2. LUG-11- A variety of strategically located heavy industrial areas should be designated and protected from conflicting land uses. 3. LUP-11.1- Commercial, residential and recreational uses should be limited or not allowed in areas designated for industry, except for small-scale ancillary commercial and recreational uses intended to primarily serve the industrial area. 4. LUP-11.2- Conversion of designated industrial lands to other uses should be strictly limited to ensure an adequate land supply, 5. LUP-12.1-Commerical, residential and recreational uses shall be limited or not allowed in areas designated for light industry, except for small-scale ancillary commercial and recreational uses primarily to serve the industrial area. Ms. Janssen stated that Staff recommends denial of amendment to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC) 19.120. Questions: Commissioner McCaslin asked why the word residential is put in LUP-11.1. In addition, has anybody had any requests for residential in the Iight industrial area? Ms. Janssen stated that yes they have had questions regarding that at the Permit Center. (People wanting to locate residential in industrial areas). Public Comment: Tiara Racicot, 16612 E. Indiana # D108, Spokane Valley. A packet was passed around to the Planning Commission from Ms. Racicot. (See enclosed Attachment "A"). Ms. Racicot stated she has a huge amount of equipment totaling to a minimum of 15,000 square feet, so when you go out of the industrial zones its double to triple the price. She has ring towers reaching nineteen feet high, which need twenty-foot ceilings. Floor exercises are 45 by 45 feet, so columns within warehousing have to leave her with that amount of room, She stated that at this point she has exhausted every possible building. The industrial zone is her only option within the city limits. Ms. Racicot stated that there are already two other gymnastic facilities in the industrial zones and she hopes the City will give her the opportunity to do the same. Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 8 Commissioner Bates stated that the specialized training and learning schools are permitted use in six of our zones within the city and that encompasses most of the city. Mixed use, corridor mixed use, garden office, office, community commercial and regional commercial. Conunissioner Bates asked Ms. Racicot if there were buildings in any of the stated zones that would fit her needs. Ms. Racicot stated that she has gone thru every broker system and it has been an ongoing search since the beginning of April, with the specific requirements of the ceilings,pillars, and space, that she needs there is nothing. Commissioner Stoy asked what her facility does. Ms. Racicot responded that she holds Mommy and Me classes, recreational classes, adult classes, yoga, gymnastics. Commissioner Bates asked how many people she would employ. Ms. Racicot stated after the first year probably about twenty. Commissioner Bates asked what her main reason that she chooses the building she has in mind. Ms. Racicot responded that it is ideally set up with a sprinkler system, up to code, has the right spacing, and has the column situation where everything is outright twenty thousand square feet and half the price of anything she could have got if it was available. It's in the light industrial zone off Bradley by the UPS building. Shelli Waddell, 16621 E. Indiana Ave #D103, Spokane Valley. Ms. Waddell stated that she is a mom who has had kids in gymnastics and in traveling in that she has traveled the State of Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana, California, and Colorado. She stated that every site she has been to was an industrial zone. She stated she is permanently disabled and she has no safety concerns,traveling to those sites they are much more accommodating then some of the other sites she has been to. Industrial zones are more willing to build and be accommodating. Ms.Waddel stated that it seems kind of funny that cities like Liberty Lake, Spokane and the rest of Washington State allow this in the industrial zone and why wouldn't the City of Spokane Valley want to move forward and progress like everyone else has. Spokane Valley is willing to advertise (hey come to us were willing to work with you, were willing to change your permits). She stated that something like this is a no brainer. Commissioner Bates asked Ms. Waddell in her experience is it daytime activities or nighttime activities? Ms. Waddell responded that the kids were in school in the daytime, so it was in the evenings. Usually classes were 5-8 pm five days a week and some weekends. A few mornings for Mommy and Me's program for stay at home moms. Todd Whipple, 2528 N. Sullivan, Spokane Valley. A packet was passed around to the Planning Commission. (See attachment "B"). Mr. Whipple stated, in the packet is The City of Spokane's Code for Light Industrial with what has allowed and not allowed. Also included in the City code is the definition of Community Services, which is what this would technically fall under. Mr. Whipple stated also in the Community Services that they could see the exceptions that were noted when it becomes retail sales and service. Page four of the packet. Mr. Whipple stated he works with many land developers, which have many discussions about everybody is chasing the same dollar. Where should that dollar be spent? Should it be spent in Spokane, Spokane Valley, or Liberty Lake? One of the reasons Liberty Lake allows it is because of the HUB, which is a very nice sports facility that just happens to be located in light industrial. Mr. Whipple's opinion is; the Light Industry category is not to be as feared for change as is the resulting blight. He stated he wrote that in his first letter and was trying to be fairly hard about it. It's the cities responsibility to help and facilitate business. The city has an incredible amount by Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 8 percentage of heavy and light industrial for what he believes is per capita ratio. There are not that many 20,000 foot clear span buildings and the perception is that grocery stores are clear span but they're not. He said if you were to take a hard look at every grocery store, you would see that they put the rack lines on the column lines every twelve to sixteen feet. It's the clear span elements and some of the uses that can be facilitated by that in the long run that will help. He expressed in hopes that the City of Spokane Valley would come forward along with everyone else who has already done it. He stated that it could go too far to protect an industry, to the detriment of your City. Robert Bonnecelli, 4904 S. St. Andrews Lane, Spokane. Mr. Bonnecelli stated that he is a lifetime resident of Spokane Valley. He is the owner and or partner in owning about seven hundred thousand square feet of industrial buildings in the City of Spokane Valley that compromise about twenty-five separate projects. In addition, he is one of the managing partners of Pinecroft Buisness Park, which has three hundred and sixty thousand square feet of Business Park at Pines and Mirabeau Parkway. He stated he has many projects in the Valley, grew up here, and has paid a lot of taxes. This amendment to the text that Tiara is asking for is a no brainer. Mr. Bonnecelli commented that he is the owner of the building that Tiara is hoping to occupy. Changing this text amendment is going to allow a very compatible low impact use in this facility. He stated he has leased to several gyms in the industrial zone in the Spokane Valley, and currently he has two tenants that are gym related uses in industrial zones, one in Spokane Valley, and one in California. Piper Driskell, 11014 E. 21st, Spokane Valley. Ms. Driskell wanted more information as to why the City of Spokane Valley's staff recommended to deny the amendment. Commissioner Bates stated this is a time to make a presentation to the Planning Commission and discussion and other information come after that. Commissioner Bates stated a letter was added to the record for Public comment. (See Attachment"C"). There were no further comments and Commissioner Bates closed the Public Hearing at 6:43 PM. Motion: Commissioner Neill moved to approve and forward to City Council CIA-2013- 0006 as presented, a second was made. Discussion: Commissioner Stoy had concerns about the existing lighting levels due to the fact that light industrial zones are not quite as high as a regular retail area might be as far a for kids running around in the evening hours and how much truck traffic would there be due to it being a light industrial zone. Commissioner Stoy stated he thinks this should be allowed in industrial zones, but he just wants to make sure that there might be some stipulations to make sure we do have adequate lighting for that type of a use and make that part of the tenant improvement permit just to make sure there is enough light. Commissioner Bates reminded the Planning Commissioners that this is a request for permitted use in the light industrial use and the conditional use in the heavy industrial and if we approve and recommend to the City Council we not only change it for the building that is in question but that entire zone anywhere within our City. Commissioner Bates concern is that this would be city wide as a permitted use. Commissioner McCaslin Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 8 commented that in all his experience with his daughter being in gymnastics that anytime he took her there, he took her directly in the building and if the kids were waiting for anything, they stayed within the building. It was not outside. Commissioner Bates stated that Planning Commission did not get a chance to study over the material that was handed out (Attachments A, B,) and in all fairness, he had hoped they could end the discussion and take a recommendation that evening. He commented that with anything this major we should take our time and read all the information before there is a decision. Commissioner Anderson stated that two of the items supporting the applicant from the municipal code EDG-1 and EDG-2 (refer to page 3 of this document) do support the applicant due to the fact it encourages economic development. Staff comments LUG-10 and LUG-11 and LUP-11.2 (refer to page 3 of this document); Commissioner Anderson does not think these apply. He stated he agrees we are not developing new or converting existing industrial land into a different use and we are not converting industrial land. It's talking about a zoning action, but he thinks LUP-11.1 and LUP-12.1 do apply if they are taken literally. Commissioner Anderson stated that he does not see anything that is being offered to do in this application is any different from some of the items that are cutrently allowed in our own code. He does not think there is a public health safety welfare item, our job is not to further it, we just do not want to create a safety problem. He stated lighting is a problem anywhere. Commissioner Anderson supports the applicant stating he can't find any negatives. Commissioner Carlsen stated she liked that the proposed code text amendment request is utilizing existing structures for repurposing and not suggesting building new. She stated that currently we do allow similar facilities such as professional, vocational, trade schools and the golf driving range facilities. Commissioner Carlsen commented she believes to be consistent and to follow the Comprehensive Plan, we should think about allowing the specialized training and learning schools to be a conditional use in I-1 light industrial and not be allowed in I-2 heavy industrial. This allows for in this case she has a building in the light industrial area that fits her needs and on this case it only can be met on this particular location, it should be something that we can address. Commissioner Carlsen stated she does not think that the heavy industrial should be used for this. It already states in the Comprehensive Plan that we should limit the uses to small scale and she does not see a dance, gymnastics or martial arts in the industrial parks. Commissioner McCaslin asked if we would be denying a manufacturing concern valuable space if we allowed a learning studio. Is there that much demand for manufacturing space? He also stated as a City are we trying to attract manufacturing by offering tax breaks, wouldn't the City of Spokane Valley benefit from that, and shouldn't this be business and landowner driven and not driven by our City. Commissioner provided the pros to this proposal; use of empty buildings that would otherwise be unused, business development for Spokane Valley and the allowance of being business and customer driven. Commissioner Phillips commented that he believes we should allow businesses and property owners to make the decision whether they want to fill a building with a manufacturing need and or if they cannot feel that need then they should be able to decide. Planning Commission Arlinutes Page 6 of 8 He stated if there is a lighting problem, the customer could let the gymnastics company know this and it would take care of itself, Commissioner Phillips supports the proposal. Commissioner Neill stated he supports this because he loves to see new business coming in, Commissioner Neill asked Community Development Director John Hohman if there is a difference in the code for lighting for light industrial verses retail. Mr. Hohman responded no, we recently looked at the lighting code, before we did have some type of "not to exceed" language in there, The City does not regulate how much light, it is up to the proponent to bring that forward. Commissioner Bates stated he has a problem with this and that he relates to the Comprehensive Pian as the City's declaration as far as our City's Land Use. Commissioner Bates passed along a copy of the heavy industry and light industry from the Comprehensive Plan for the PIanning Commission (see attachment "D"). Commissioner Bates requested that 2.5.6 Industrial Designations from the Comprehensive Plan be part of the record. After Commissioner Bates read aloud 2.5.6 Industrial Designation, he commented on his definition of ancillary uses,which he believes it means support of our industrial areas such as banks, credit unions, and convenient stores, these types of things, which are supported by the Comprehensive Plan to support the industrial area. Commissioner Bates reminded the Planning Commissioners that if were approving or recommending approval of the industrial area were doing it citywide, and not just talking about this one building. Commissioner Bates stated he does not intend to support the application. Commissioner Bates stated that it is important to go thru all the documents that were handed out that evening in order to make a clear decision. He asked the Planning Commission how they felt about it. Majority felt they were ready to vote. Commissioner Anderson stated that he understands what Commissioner Bates just read, 2.5.6, and he thinks it needs to be taken in context that if you are developing a new industrial area or you're going to signify a new industrial area than you have the ability to put some stringent "what shall" and "not shall" be there, Most of the industrial areas that are being discussed is already developed. We are filling in an area that has no activity. Mr. Hohman stated the Comprehensive Plan applies for existing and new. You cannot just take the new and apply it to that. Commissioner McCaslin stated that it keeps coining back to some of Tiera's comments about her search for an appropriate place for what she is trying to do and the fact that she has only found it in the areas she's talking about, plus the fact the cost of putting that together in that building is so much lower. Commissioner McCaslin agreed that we need to take a good look at the Comp Plan and that there are parts that need to be revised, Commissioner Stoy stated that Mr. Bonnecelli has about 700,000 square feet of leasable space in different industrial areas. The industrial park has around 500,000 square feet of additional space. Looking at the information provided by staff on the Matrix, item number 713 is Entertainment/recreation facilities, indoor, which is an outright permitted use in the I-2. 7133 is Entertainment/recreation facilities, outdoor, is an outright permitted use in the I-1. Commissioner Stoy stated he thinks the Comprehensive Plan has missed this particular use, because it's right in the Matrix to have an indoor or outdoor recreation facility. Commissioner,Stay supports this. Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 8 Motion on floor: Planning Commission Vote was to forward to the City Council as Presented CTA-2013- 0006, 5 in favor, 2 against (Commissioner Bates and Commissioner Carlsen), the motion was Passed XI. GOOD OF THE ORDER: There were no comments. XII. ADJOURNMENT There being no other business the meeting was adjourned at 7;18 part. r 1 _, .. Bill Bates, Chairperson ite-g-c. i Cari Hinshaw, PC Secretary Date signed E/aa J/3 Planning Commission Minutes Page 8 of 8 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 24, 2013 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ® information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Request by Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency to ban most types of outdoor wood burning in the City GOVERNING LEGISLATION: NA PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: The Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency (SRCAA) sent a letter to the City to ask whether there is interest in the City adopting an ordinance prohibiting most types of outdoor wood burning within the jurisdictional limits of the City. The letter included a proposed ordinance in the event the City is interested in pursuing this matter. The letter and draft ordinance are attached. OPTIONS: (1) Consider discussion and/or adoption of an ordinance banning most outdoor wood burning in the City; (2) do nothing. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Advise staff whether there is any interest by Council for considering a draft ordinance banning most outdoor wood burning within the City. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: NA STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney ATTACHMENTS: Letter from SRCAA with proposed ordinance 1 R EC EIV P D sEp• 111 • IIw1r 1 1 2013 Spokane Regional r Ore OF SPOKANE VALLEY v�ean A�rAgency tEGA.L DEP,471TMENT 3104 E.Augusta Avenue. Spokane,WA 99207 • (509)477-6777 • Fax(509)477-6828 • www.spokanecleanainorg September 5, 2013 RECEIVED CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY ATTN MAYOR TOM TOWEY City of Spokane Valley 11707 E SPRAGUE AVE STE 106 SPOKANE VALLEY WA 99206-6124 Dear Mayor Towey: Portable wood-burning appliances seem to be growing in popularity for backyard recreational fires. Recreational fires are defined in WAC 173-425-030(21) as ".,,cooking fires, campfires, and bonfires using charcoal or firewood that occur in designated areas or on private property for cooking, pleasure, or ceremonial purposes. Fires used for debris disposal purposes are not considered recreational fires." Fires used for disposal are unlawful and are subject to fines which start at $200 and can go up to $10,000 per day,per violation,. While we have no specific data on the number of these appliances being used, they can be found at many general retail stores and home improvement stores. With the use of these devices increasing,particularly in more urban areas, smoke impacts are expected to increase over time. While some city residents have portable backyard wood-burning appliances, others have recreational fire pits in their backyards. We periodically hear complaints from city residents that are surprised and displeased to hear that such fires are legal in urban areas. Impacts from residential outdoor wood burning can be localized (neighbor-to-neighbor) and general (e.g. smoke in the area). While some people enjoy the smell of wood smoke, burning wood produces toxic air pollutants. When inhaled, these pollutants can have serious impacts on our lungs. Those at greatest risk are children, the elderly, and those suffering from chronic respiratory conditions, such as asthma, emphysema and bronchitis. It is difficult to determine the true extent of smoke impacts from recreational fires. Complaints may be reported to varying entities, including S,RCAA, fire districts, and city code enforcement offices. SRCAA receives about 200 outdoor burning complaints each year throughout Spokane County. Most of them pertain to recreational fires while others are yard debris disposal fires, silvicultural fires, and other types of fires (e.g. burning garbage). It is not uncommon to find portable wood-burning appliances and fire pits being used to dispose of yard waste, household garbage, and other prohibited materials. 1 I P ; c working with you for cyan air 0 One possible option for addressing emissions from recreational fires in more urban areas is to prohibit wood-fueled recreational fires within the city limits. The Olympic Regional Clean Air Agency (ORCAA)did this within the city limits of Olympia, Lacey and Tumwater and the unincorporated areas in-between in 1993 (ORCAA Rule 6,2.7). On.Tune 27,2413,staff asked the SRCAA Advisory Council if they thought wood-fueled recreational fires should generally be prohibited inside more urban areas. One of the members suggested that SRCAA may want to consider developing a model ordinance and encourage cities to adopt it,but ultimately leave the decision up to them. It was reported that the Spokane Regional Health District was successful in taking this approach with the bicycle helmet law. On August 1, 2413, staff discussed proposed revisions to SRCAA's outdoor burning regulations with the Board. The passibility of incorporating restrictions on woad-fueled recreational fires in more urban areas was included in the discussion. Consistent with the discussion at the Advisory Council, the Board instructed staff to develop a model ordinance which could be provided to cities in Spokane County for consideration. The attached model ordinance limiting outdoor fires was reviewed by SRCAA's Board of Directors on September 5,2013. While the focus of the discussion pertained to restrictions in more urban areas,wood-fueled recreational fires could also be limited in unincorporated areas as well, SRCAA believes-that-the CITY-OF SPOKANE VALLEY may want to consider-using this model ordinance to develop its own ordinance limiting outdoor fires within the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY. If you have any questions regarding SRCAA's outdoor burning program or the model ordinance, attached,please don't hesitate to contact Matt Holmquist, Compliance Administrator, at 477- 4727 ext. 142 or Lisa Woodard,Public Information Officer, at 477-4727 ext. 115. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency William O. Dameworth Director Cc: Correspondence file 2IPage Y Model Ordinance Limiting Outdoor Fires Outdoor fires can be a nuisance to neighbors, may impair the health of certain individuals and can pose a fire hazard to the community. Many types of outdoor fires are prohibited in the state. of Washington. Effective July 1, 2014,outdoor fires fueled by woad are prohibited within the city limits of , Washington, except as provided below_ After July 1, 2014,only the following types of outdoor fires will be allowed within the city limits: 1. 'Woad-fueled campfires at designated parks and recreational areas, if not otherwise prohibited. 2. Wood-fueled smokers used solely for the preparation of food. 3. Wood pellet-fueled grills used solely for the preparation of food. 4. Wood-fueled food preparation equipment used by commercial food service businesses. 5. Wood chips used for flavoring food only. 6. Charcoal-fueled grills, natural gas grills, and propane grills. 7. Other outdoor fires if permitted by the city and Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency (e.g., social event fires, flag retirement ceremony fires, fire training fires, etc.) if not otherwise prohibited. 3IP .1gc ■ CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 24, 2013 Department Director Approval Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ® executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: EXECUTIVE SESSION: Potential Acquisition of Real Estate; and Potential Litigation GOVERNING LEGISLATION: [RCW 42.30.110(1)(b) and(i)] PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: "I Move that Council adjourn into executive session for approximately sixty minutes to discuss potential acquisition of real estate, and potential litigation, and that no action will be taken upon return to open session." BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: ATTACHMENTS: