2007, 01-09 Regular MeetingAGENDA
SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR 117IE- ETING
Council Meeting #107
Tuesday, January 9, 2007
6:00 p.m.
CITY IIIAL.L AT REDWOOD PLAZA
11707 East Sprague Avenue, First Floor
Council Requests All Eketronic Devices be Turned OR During Council Meeting
CALL TO ORDER:
NVOCATION: Pastor Dave Smith, Living Water Community Church
PUTI)GE OF ALLEGIANCE:
ROLL. CALL:
AN'ROVAL ()l;' A(;FIN DA:
LN-IRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GAFSTS AND PRESENTATIONS: New Employee Introduction:
Building Official Mary Kate Martin, by Community Devcloprncnt Director Marina Sukup
CONINIFITEV., BOARD, LIAISON SUNIAtARY REPORTS:
~!-XYOR'S R-LPORT:
PUBLIC COMNIEFI TS: Except where indicated below for "public comment" this is an opportunity for
the public to yak on any topic. When you come to the podium, please ate your name and address for
the record and limit remarks to three minute.
1. PUBLIC IIEARL'V'G: Extension of UR- I Zoning - Marina Sukup
2. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. A
Cotmcilmember may remove an item from the Consent Agenda to be considered sepanttcly.
a. Following Claim Vouchers:
VOUCHER LIST DATE
VOUCHER Ns
TOTAL VOUCHER
AMOUNT
12-08-2006
10551
6.25
12-08-2006
10552
5,5-48.45.
12-08-2006
10550- 10553-10607
406 852.77
12-15-2006
10608:10615-10676 (excluding
224,636.19
voided 1062 and 10646)
12-26-2006
10677-10736 (excluding voided
301,499.14
_
10686 and 10702)
80
938
542
GRAND TOTAL.
,
.
b. Payroll for Period Ending December 15, 2006: $161,392.16
c. Payroll for Period Ending December 31, 2006: 52 19,620.94
d. Ratification of January 2, 2007 City Ball Closure
e. Minutes of D"-ember 12, 2006 Council Regular Nieoting
f. Minutes of December 19, 2006 Council Study Session Meeting
L
n~
Cotmril A&=& 01.09-07 Regular Mfeeting Page I of 2
NFtiV 131 SINE- SS
3. First Reading Proposed Ordirumce 07-001 Extending UR-1 Zone - Marina Sukup [public comment[
4. First Rcading Proposed Ordinance 07-002 Street Vacation Portion of ) 5'h Avenue - Karen Kendall
[public comment]
5. Motion Consideration: Fiber Internet Service for CentcrPlacc -Mike Jackson [public comment[
PUBLIC CON1btENTS Except where indicated above for "public comment" this is an opportunity foe
the public 10',peak on snN topic. Whcn you conic to the podium, please stale your name and address fm
the recent and limit remark-; to three trunute,
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS:
6. Request for Qualifications for City Center Consulting Services - Scatt Kuhl
7. Proposed Ordinance Amending Dangerous Dog Appeals - Cary Driskell
INFORMATION ONLY:
8. Contract for ArchitecturcJEngincering Services for Outdoor Pool Renovation - Mike Jas
9. Cyclo-Cross (Bicycles) Event - Mike Jackson
10 City Use of Geiger Wort: Crews - Cary Driskell
EXECtI FIVE, SYSSU)N:
AlMOURNMEN'r
FUTURE SCHEDULE
Regular Council Afeetingr are generally held 2nd and 4'* Tuesdays, beginning at 6:00 p. HL
Council Study Sessions are generalhr held 1, fd and 5th Tuesdays, beginning at 6:00 p.m.
Tuesday. Februarv 13. 2007: No Meeting (Association of Washington Cities Confcrence)
Other Tentative L7i orninm4feetinps~Events:
Surat~tlt~~~p cwav revjt lizatiun an Public Meatinas and Wockshms;
'rues, January 16, 2007: Special Workshop Meeting, 6:00 p.m. Decades Banquet Room
NOTICE: Indi-viduais ptanning to attend the meeting whn require special assistance to accommodate physical, having, or other
impairments, please conmet the City Clergy; at (509) 921-11000 ns uinn as passible w that a mnucmcnts tttsy be made,
uundl Agenda 01-09-G7 Kegular Meeting Page
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: January 9, 2007.
City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ® public hearing
® information ❑ admin. report ® pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: An ordinance extending the UR-1 Urban
Residential Estate Interim Zoning for a fourth six months in the
Ponderosa and Rotchford Neighborhoods and amending the findings
of fact and work plan.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35A.63.220, Spokane Valley Ordinance 05-025
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Ordinance No. 06-019 extending the Interim Zoning
for an additional six months to coincide with the
adoption of Spokane Valley - Development
Regulations.
BACKGROUND: An interim zoning ordinance may be renewed for one or more six-month
periods if a public hearing is held and findings of fact are made prior to each renewal. The
purpose of interim zoning is to maintain a status quo. The UR-1 interim zoning does not impose
a moratorium on construction, but does restrict further subdivision of land within the Ponderosa
and Rotchford neighborhoods.
The Interim UR-1 Urban Residential Estate Zoning was originally effective on September 8,
r- 2004. A third renewal of six months was authorized until March 6, 2007. The updated work
plan had anticipated completion of development regulations, design guidelines and performance
standards implementing the Spokane Valley 2006-2026 Comprehensive Plan prior to this date.
The completion of development regulations is not expected to be complete until March 31,
2007, with actual rezoning with notice to affected property owners within six months thereafter.
It is anticipated that the development regulations will provide for an "R-1 - Residential Estate
Zoning District", with the same or similar provisions as those of the interim UR-1 district.
The City has received a single objection to continuance of the interim zoning regulation. The
objection centered on the minimum 40,000 square foot requirement for new lots.
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: n/a
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Not applicable.
STAFF CONTACT: Marina Sukup, Community Development Director
ATTACHMENTS:
Draft ordinance - see agenda Item. 03
Spo"ne
,;o$ Valley
UR-1 Residential Estate
Interim Zoning Extension #4
Public Hearing
Community Development Department
January 9, 2007
BACKGROUND
• Authorized pursuant to RCW 35A.63.105, WAC
365-195-845, WAC 365-195-855, and the City's
Interim Comprehensive Plan
• Interim UR-1 Residential Estate Zoning was initially
approved by City Council on August 24, 2004,
pursuant to Ordinance No. 04-035 and effective on
September 8, 2004, and valid for a period of 12
months with Findings of Fact and a Work Plan
• The third extension of the UR-1 zoning was
approved in September 2006 pursuant to Ordinance
No. 06-019.
• Finding of Fact and the Work Plan have been
updated
1
i
Rotchford Acres/Shelley Acres Addn
CV.High School
1
2
Background
• The work plan anticipated completion of development
regulations, design guidelines and performance
standards implementing the Spokane Valley 2006-2026
Comprehensive Plan prior to March 6, 2007.
• The completion of development regulations is not
expected to be complete until March 31, 2007, with
actual rezoning with notice to affected property owners
within six months thereafter.
• It is anticipated that the development regulations will
provide for an "R-1 - Residential Estate Zoning
District", with the same or similar provisions as those of
the interim UR-1 district.
E;MWA •C
RBISW UR-1 Werfm Zacdna Wert Plan
January 1, 2007
XJ
.
Tail A>.ri- -
Sw.
Fi h
" • ocr'-
AnY.n
oia o. it mu air
_
w V' ~ M
q W y m Mor i`r "M+ .Wr Y IM M N
I
udarrwmooa cn-a~i
304076
Wu2m
►.2w hm~
2
ca.Qrn.tn.rm:' .
AAg1-a
'
!s27ie
sur:oe
Y
. es
`
5.
DaCQ, 0.0.y
3M=
Uhl=
37r
-
Ensl wCUUR
]nR001
T&TO:7
Ir
41
/
.
5'
S-RiN Cn~l gaM-P,
72.:07e
"TzSr]p07-
OO Ir
6
P.M. He-MSO.Ury
SERC06
L7=:0!
:Iw
7
H-z W a fyf : Lace--
-
3.=DO_S
awnwf
'7 '
?:r.-a 9.6.
eM07e
ir17170:4
52.eo
0
Rmut-rary Re.1-
70nnooa
2ra=1
ow
to
1 "m
YZT.'luCle
1!]R067
:1
R-aanr: Cvrnlata
'-~r19:b7
ill: Ve0C7
1M -
Rv.6nf BCNOA
3
r
Recommendation
• Planning Commission recommended
extending the interim UR-1 zoning for six
months, adopting the Revised Findings of
Fact and Workplan
• Staff concurs with the recommendation of
the Planning Commission
f-
4
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 01-09-07 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: x consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Following Vouchers:
VOUCHER LIST DATE
VOUCHER ##s
TOTAL VOUCHER
AMOUNT
12-08-2006
10551
6.25
12-08-2006
10552
5,548.45
12-08-2006
10550; 10553-10607
406 852.77
12-15-2006
10608; 10615-10676 (excluding
224
636.19
voided 10622 and 10646
,
12-26-2006
10677-10736 (excluding voided
301,499.14
10686 and 10702
GRAND TOTAL
938,542.80
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
Approve claims for vouchers as listed above.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT: Amy Sienknecht
ATTACHMENTS Voucher Lists
vchlist Voucher List Page: 1
1210812006 4:36:18PM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount
10551 .12/412006 000324 SPOKANE COUNTY WATER DIST. #3 12042006 WATER,BILLING '6.25
1 Vouchers for bank code : apbank
1 Vouchers in this report
I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury,
that the materials have been furnished, the services,
rendered, or the labor performed as described herein
and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation
against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am
authorized to authenticate and certify to said claim.
Finance Director
Date
Total : 6.25
Bank total : 6.25
Total vouchers : 6.25
APPROVED:
Ken Thompson, ance Director
Mayor Wilhite A
/ 2-/2-
Date
-,age: 1
vchlist
12/08/2006 1:03:55PM
Bank code: apbank
Voucher List
Spokane Valley Page'
Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
10552 12/812006 000028 FARMERS 8 MERCHANTS BANK 1217
1225
1829
1852
5045
5169
1 Vouchers for bank code : apbank
1 Vouchers in this report
APPROWD:
Total vouchers : 5,548.45
I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury,
that the materials have been fumished, the services
rendered, or the labor performed as dcscribod herein
and that the claim Is just, due and an unpaid obligation
against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am
authorized to authenticate and certify to said claim.
Finance Director Date
1
Descrtption/Account
Amount
MERCIER'S CARD
104.62
GOLMAN'S CARD
863
96
GENERAL CARD #1
.
2
772
07
GENERAL CARD #4
,
.
1
550
07
DEVLEMING'S CARD
,
.
114
17
WILHITE'S CARD
.
143.56
Total :
5,548.45
Bank total :
5,548.45
Ken Thompson, . ' ance Director
Mayes ~4 ~
/2--1 i - OC.
Date
Page: 1
vablist ::Vouches list ~
1210812006 4:18:43P M Page: 1
Spo,kane:Valley,_
Bank code : apbank
Voucher
. Date.
Vendor
Invoice:
PO # .
Description/Account
10550
11/30/2005
000898 SPOKANE PROCARE
11302006
Amount
LANDSCAPING SERVICES
5,529.39
10553
12/8/2006
000335 ALTON'S TIRE INC.
6-20645
Total :
5,529.39
-
04 DAKOTA SERVICE MAINTENAN(
56
56
6-20914
03 EXPLORER VEHICLE MAINTENA
.
40.60
10554
12/8/2006
.000400 AMER INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS
2000788557
Total :
97.16
MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL
675.00
10555
1218/2006
000212 ATTORNEY NOTARY SUPPLY
092106
Total :
675.00
NOTARY.STAMP FOR CARRIE ACO
46.78
Total :
46.78
10556
12/8/2006
000030 .AV:I$TA UTILITIES
12012006
-
BILLING DATE 11/27/2006
5,759.14
10557
1218/2006
000918. BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY, INC.
877
167
Total :
5,759.14
,
-
LINEN SUPPLY FOR CENTERPLACI
213
36
8773052
LINEN SUPPLY FOR CENTERPLACI
.
235.63
Total :
448.99
10558
12/8/2006
'001022- CARR SALES CO.
922117t
41405
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
182.38.
Total :
182.38
10559
12/8!2006
000729 CH2MHILL INC.
3577526
40691
0009 - VALLEY CORRIDOR ENV
ST'
.
9,059.39
Total :
9,059.39
10560
12/8/2006
000379 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
12042006
BILLING
48.00
Total :
48.00
10561
12/8/2006
000957 COBALTTRUCK EQUIPMENT
20320 "
41390
PICK-UP ACCESSORIES FOR F2
50
1,257.31
10562
12/8/2006
'000109 COFFEE SYSTEMS INC
Total :
1,257.31
45705
COFFEE ORDER 1211/2006
142.33
Total :
142.33
10563
1218/2006
000508 CONOCOPHILLIPS FLEET
870166725611
GAS CHARGES' 10/26-11126
1,591.05
Page: 1
vchlist Voucher List
12108/2006. 4:18:43PM Spokane-Valley
Page: 2
Bank code : apbank
Voucher
Date.
Vendor
Invoice
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
10563
12!812006
000508 000508. CONOCOPHILLIPS FLEET
(Continued)'
Total :
1,591:05
10564
12/8!2006
000326 CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DIST, #19
120106
WATER BILLING
70.57
120106-2
WATER BILLING
52.30
Total
122.87
10565
12/8/2006
001120 CVS'WHOLESALE FLAGS
100467695
41264
OPERATING SUPPLIES
186.06
Total :
186.06
10566
12/8/2006
001194 DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY, CASHIERI
I 7222
CERTIFICATION'RENEWAL
30.00
Total :
30.00
10567
12/8/2006
001134 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
10460
CERTIFICATION RENEWAL
42.00
Total :
42.00
10568
1218/2006
000686 DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING
12012006
LICENSE-RENEWAL
99.00
Total :
99.00
10569
12/8/2006
000152 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
re-313-atb61114076
MONTHLY MAINTENANCE
3,868.50
re-313-atb61114077
MONTHLY MAINTENANCE
7,452.07
re-313-atb61114111
PINESIMANSFIELD PROJECT
2,132.86
re-313-atb61114113 .
ARGONNE ROAD OVERLAY-.
38.09
Total :
13,511.52
10570
12/8/2006
000059 DEVLEMING, MICHAEL
12052006
REIMBURSEMENT
78,76
Total :
78.76
10571
12/8/2006
000246 EAST SPOKANE WATER DIST #1
12042006
WATER BILLING .
93.74
12042006-2
WATER BILLING
311.93
12042006-3
WATER BILLING
293.97
124/0412006
WATER BILLING
148.51
Total :
848.15
10572
1218/2006
000171 GEIGER CORRECTIONS CENTER
41500149
SEPTEMBER 2006 HOUSING INVOI
93,289.93
Total :
93,289.93
10573
12/8/2006
000007 GRAINGER-
923463237.1 , •
41402
_ GRAINGER TRASH PUMP.
132.58
9234632389
41402
GRAINGER TRASH PUMP
88.03
s: 2
vchlisf
-J
UC
.Li
11108/2006
-4:18:43PM
O
her•
st
Spokane Valley
Page: 3
Bank code :
'apbank
Voucher
10573
Date Vendor:
1218/2006 000007 GRAINGER
Invoice
(Continued)
PO #
Description/Account.
Amount
9234806447
9236619467
41402
41301
GRAINGER TRASH PUMP
GRAINGER - MISC. NEEDS
2,228.71
38.04
10574
12/8/2008 000002 H & H BUSINESS'SYSTEMS INC.
152382
Total :
MONTHLY CONTRACT CHARGES
2,487.36
66.10
10575
1218/2006 000222 ICMA RETIREMENT'CORP.
017235
Total :
EMPLOYEE APPRECIATION
66.10
375.00
10576
12/8/2006 000117-JOURNALjNEWS PUBLISHING INC.
~
-
`
28419
28420
28421
28422
28423
48971
49139 -
49140.
Total :
ADVERTISING
ADVERTISING
ADVERTISING
ADVERTISING
ADVERTISING
ADVERTISING
ADVERTISING
ADVERTISING
375.00
25.00
66.00
81.00
63.00
66.00
40.00
40.00
150.00
Total :
531.00
• 10577
12/8/2006 000864 _JUB ENGINEERS, INC.
0042714
41166
06-001 STREET MASTER PLAN
16,267.78
Total :
16,267.78
10578
12/812006 000933, LAW SEMINARS INTERNATIONAL
29982.
PUBLICATIONS FOR LEGAL
100.00
Total :
100.00
10579
12/8/2006 000755 LEAGUE OF-OREGON CITIES
4605
WEB ADS
50.00
10580
12/8/2006 000993 LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER
268435
744691
744692
744699
Total :
TIRE MAINTENANCE
06769D PICK-UP MAINTENANCE
32809D PICK-UP MAINTENANCE
40203D PICK-UP MAINTENANCE
50.00
959.85
48,87
48.87
24.44
Total :
1,082.03
10581
12/812006'001058 MCROBERTS, CAROLINE
12042006
REIMBURSEMENT
18.91
Page: 3
vchlist
1210812006
4:18:43PM
Voucher-List
; Spokane Valley
Page:
4
Bank code :
apbank
,
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO #
Description/Account,
Amount
10581
121812006
001058 001058 MCROBERTS, CAROLINE
(Continued) ;
• Total :
18.91
10582
121812006
000662' NATIONAL BARRICADE & SIGN CO., OF
53636
41303
NATIONAL BARRICADE -MISC. NEI
16.29
Total :
16.29
10583
12/8/2006
001035 NETWORK DESIGN & MANAGEMENT
14627
MONTHLY MAINTENANCE & OTHEf
2,502.50
Total :
2,502.50
10584,
12/812006
000652 OFFICE DEPOT.INC.
362035035-001
41395
OFFICE SUPPLIES
69.13
363017214-001
41406
OFFICE SUPPLIES
14.06
363584784-001
41410
TONER CARTRIDGE FOR TRISH
1,330.74
363660371-001
41411.
SUPPLIES -FOR-AMY
41.31
36366047.4001
41411
SUPPLIES FOR AMY
32.59
363765122=001
41412
OFFICE DEPOT
274.18
Total :
1,762.01
10585
12/812006
000512 OFFICETEAM
17208405
SERVICES FOR ANGELA FINCH
528.00
17245063
SERVICES FOR KIMBERLY WILLIAt
515.63
•17259289
SERVICES FOR CENTERPLACE
120.96
17301279
SERVICES FOR CENTERPLACE
483.84
Total :
1,648.43
10586
12/8/2006
001033 PFLIEGER, CHARLIE
12042006
REIMBURSEMENT
737.13
Total :
737.13
10587
12/812006
000119 PIP PRINTING INC.
1330035954
Business cads and nameplate for To
175.16
1330036138
CAFR PRINTING
504.83
Total : -
679.99
10588
12/8/2006
001089 POE ASPHALT PAVING, INC.
42217.
41325
CONTRACT NO.06-019 POE ASPHA
62,007.71
Total:
62,007.71
10589
12/8/2006
000494 PRO PEOPLE STAFFING SERV INC.
18,165
SERVICES FOR CENTERPLACE
1,663.58
Total :
1,663.58
10590
1218/2006
000041 PROTHMAN COMPANY
2006-652
BUILDING OFFICIAL SEARCH EXPE
992.78
2006-661
- ,RECRUITMENT OF BUILDING OFFI(
5,757.00
-le:
4
vchlisf J
Voucher List Page: 5
110812006 - 4:18:43PM Spokane;Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher
10
"
Date
Vendor _
'Y '
Invoice
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
590
10591
12/8/20
06
1218/2006
000041"
000041 PROTHMAN COMPANY
001161 PROVISIONAL STAFFING SERVICES
(Continued)
3008-0500013906
Total :
SERVICES FOR MATT KUSHNER
6,749.78
690.66
10592
1218/2006
000019 PURRFECT LOGOS, INC.
17612
41400
_
Total:
STAFF CLOTHING
690.66
36.92
10593
1218/2006
000322 QWEST
11282006
Total :
ACCOUNT NUMBER: 509-228-0669
36.92
340.13
10594
12/8/2006
000709.: SENSKE.LAWN & TREE CARE INC.-.
1558390
1558391
Tota l :
LAWN CARE SERVICES
LAWN CARE SERVICE
340.13
48,822.92
1,900.50
10595
121,812006
000854 SHERRY PRATT VAN VOORHIS, INC
759.03
41214
Total :
MIRABEAU OVERLOOK
50,723.42
960.00
10596
12/812006
000726 SHUR KLEEN SERVICES, INC.
66027
41350
Total :
JANITORIAL - CARPET CLEANING
960.00
320.00
Total :
320.00
10597
12/8/2006
001156 SIENKNECHT, AMY
12042008
REIMBURSEMENT
31.60
Total :
31.60
10598
12/8/2008
001195 SPOKANE POLICE DEPARTMENT. ATTN'12052006
POLICE DEPT. GRANT MATCH
97,422.00
Total :
97,422.00
10599
12/8/2006
000954 SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH, DISTRIC' 1242006
PERMIT APPLICATION FOR CENTE
590.00
10600
1 21812 0 0 6
'00031.1,•:SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P: - °
11152006`
Total :
CONNECTION CARD-DATA PLANS
590.00
59.09
Total :
59.09
10601
12/812006.
001057 STAR RENTALS
13-111650.02
41304
STAR RENTAL OPEN PO FOR MISC
44.80
Total :
44.80
10602
12/8/2006
000773 STUDIO CASCADE, INC.
1111
GENERAL PLANNING SERVICES -
5,280.00
Total :
5,280.00
Page: 5
vchlist
-Voucher.Ust
Page:
12108/2006
4:18:43PM -
„y Spokane Valley
Bank code :
apbank
a.
Voucher
Date 'Vendor
Invoice PO #
DescriptiorilAccount
Amount
10603
12/8/2005 000093 THE SPOKESMAN-REVIEW INC.
11302006
ADVERTISING
78.36
Total :
78.36
10604
12/8/2006 000167 VERA WATER & POWER
12042006
BILLING DATE 11/21/2006
463.95
Total :
463.95
10605
12/812006 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE
1847974-2681-5
CODE ENFORCEMENT
112.23
Total :
112.23
10606
1218/2006 000688 WEBROOT SOFTWARE, INC.
inv0062701 41407
SPYSWEEPER RENEWAL 3 YEAR
849.60
inv0062702 41407
SPYSWEEPER'RENEWAL 3 YEAR,
1,133.20
Total :
1,982.80
10607
.12/812006 000766. YMCA OF THE INLAND NORTHWEST
120106
OCTOBER 2006 -
15,926.00
Total :
15,926.00
56
Vouchers for bank code : apbank
Bank total :
406,852.77
56
Vouchers in this report
Total vouchers :
406,852.77
I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty.of perjury,
that the materials have been furnished, the services
rendered, or the labor performed as described herein
and-that the claim is just, due and gn'unpald 'obligation
against the City of Spokane Valley, and'that I am
authorized to authenticate and certify to said claim.
Finance Director Date
APPROVED:
Ken Thompson, Finance Director
Mayor Wilhite
12- 17,
Date
Ige: 6
vchlist -:.;,Voucher List
12/15!21106 4:49:58PM page.
- - Spokane.Valley. .
Bank code :
apbank
Voucher
-
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
10608
12/13/2006 000658 SPOKANE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Spo Co lawsuit
10615
12/15/2006 000958 AAA SWEEPING; LLC
37144
41203
37145-a 41167
10616
12/1512006 000197 AIR INC
.
124391
10617
12/1512006 000335 ALTON'S TIRE INC
6-21393
6-21450
6-21473
6-21522'
10618 .12/15/2006 000173 BINGAMAN, GREG 12112008
12152006
10619 12/1512006 000907 BUILDING MAINTENANCE SUPPLY 38294
~ 41397
39102 41404
10620 12/1512006 001139 CATS EYE EXCAVATING, INC.. 138-141
• 41323
10621 12/15/2006 000143 CITY`OF SPOKANE 12142006
12/1512006 000109 .COFF.EE SYSTEMS INC
1
DescrlptionlAccount
Amount
FILING FEE FOR SPOKANE COUNT
200.00
Total :
200.00
06-008 VACTORING SERVICES
13,442.32.
06-015 STREET SWEEPING SERVI(
59,495.97
Total :
72,938.29
BACKGROUND CHECKS
50.00
Total :
50.00
MAINTENANCE ON 07 F205
30.23
MAINTENANCE ON 05.DAKOTA
54
98
MAINTENANCE ON 04 F150
.
25
72
02 CHEVY S-10 MAINTENANCE
.
22.33
Total :
133.26
QUARTERLY CELL PHONE ALLOW,
105.00
REIMBURSEMENT
3.15
Total:,
108.15
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
11735
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
46.24 .
Total :
163.59
CONTRACT NO 06-022 CATS' EYE E
6,577.35
Total :
6,577.35
BILLING DATE 11/28/06
3,109.89
Total :
3,109.89
Page:
10623 Total : 12.60
45705 COFFEE ORDER 12/1/2006
• 42.95
Total: 12/15M2 06 000806 COLUMBIA FIBER SOLUTIONS 316 42.95
41380 FIBER TRANSITION SPLICE FOR St 1,086.00
vchlist Voucher List Page: 2
1211512006 4:49:58PM Spokane Valley
Bank code :
' apbank
Vouclier
Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amount
10624
1214512006 000606 COLUMBIA FIBER SOLUTIONS
(Continued)
331
MONTHLY CHARGES
228.06
Total :
1,314.06
10625
12115/2006 000060 DENENNY, RICHARD
12112006
REIMBURSEMENT
35.00
12112006-2
REIMBURSEMENT
46.30
12112006-3
QUARTERLY CELL PHONE REIMBL
105.00
Total :
186.30
10626
12115!2006, 000686 DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING
12152006
CASH TRANSMITTAL
140.00
Total :
140.00
10627
12/15/2006 000693 DEPT OF INFORMATION SERVICES
, STi 2006110204
MONTHLY BILLING
24.19
Total :
24.19
10628
12115/2006 000059 DEVLEMING, MICHAEL
12112006
QUARTERLY CELL PHONE REIMBL
105.00
Total :
105.00
10629
12115/2006 000278 DRISKELL, CARY
12152006
REIMBURSEMENT
35.26
12152006-2
REIMBURSEMENT
344.94
Total :
380.20
10630
12115/2006 000246 EAST SPOKANE WATER DIST#1
12142096
BILLING DATE 11/20/2006
1,985.01
Total :
1,985.01
10631
12115/2006 000171 GEIGER CORRECTIONS CENTER
41500162
WORK CREW BILLING
4,426.91
Total :
4,426.91,
10632
12115/2006 000071 GOLMAN, SUE
12142006
REIMBURSEMENT
13.34
Total :
13.34
10633
1211512006 001009 GOTHMANN, WILLIAM H.
.12112006-
QUARTERLY CELL PHONE; REIMBL.:
_ 105.00p
12152.006
RCIMBURSEMENT
228 3~'
Total :
333.37
'10634
12115/2006 000002 H & H BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC.
122254
COPIER SUPPLIES
276.54
151426
41384 RICOH AFICIO CL7300D LASER CO
4,410.79
` ne: 2
vchlist
Voucher List
12/15/2006 ' 4:49:58PM Spokane Valley Page: 3
Bank cgde : apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor '
Invoice PO
10634
12115/20060000002 't-x:000002 'H 8~-H BUSINESS SYSTEMS-INC
Description/Account
Amount
. (Continued)
10635
12/15/2006 000441 HOME DEPOT COMMERCIAL CREDIT
12112008
•
''Total: -
•4;687:33Lil
CREDIT PLAN CHARGES
.2,705.56
10636
12/15/2008 000070 INLAND POWER AND LIGHT CO
12112006
Total :
2,705.56
.
BILLING DATE 11/29/2006
423.01
10637
12/1512006 000388 IRVIN WATER DIST. #6
12142006
Total :
423.01
•
BILLING DATE 12/1106
166.00
10638
12/15/2006 000117 JOURNAL NEWS PUBLISHING INC
2
Total :
166.00
.
' •
8455
ADVERTISING
39
00
28456
28457
ADVERTISING
.
82.50
28458
ADVERTISING
69.75
28459
ADVERTISING
72.00
ADVERTISING
79.50
10639
12/1512006 000012 JOURNAL OF BUSINESS INC.
12112006
Total :
342.75
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
38.00
10640
12115/2006 000864-JUB ENGINEERS, INC.
0041593
Total :
38.00
41418
QUOTE N0.0032-06 CARTE
GRAPH
9,991.20
10641
12/15/2006 000755 LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES
Total :
9,991.20
4647
ADVERTISING
25.00
10642
12/1512006 000089 MERCIER: DAVID
12152006
Total :
25.00
REIMBURSEMENT
508.87
10643
1211512006 000258 MICROFLEX INC.
00016687
Total :
508.87
SOFTWARE RENTAL
341.63
10644
12/1512006 000132 MODERN ELECTRIC WATER COMPANY. 12112006
Total :
341.63
•
BILLING DATE 11/2912008
7,352.70
60645
12/15/2006 000052 MUNSON
RICHARD
Total :
7,352.70
•
,
12112006
QUARTERLY CELL PHONE REIM13l.
105.00
Total :
105.00
Page:
3
vchlist Voucher List Page: 4
1211512006 4:49:58PM Spokane Valley
Bank code:
Voucher
apbank
Date Vendor
Invoice
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
- ~Y~'.r+"s+o
F~~~T~~~ 7,~j~.J ~'~X~, 1~{Qy~t~- ~itg F~_s b
a:++ii:.afa~M9~~~5' ~ i.dL. ' -+~itL1t.~fiiLdly.4LC?C37 , ~~1,•7..~J s t c:3~'i`.~:,~''-:~:".. ~~~~.fl>C:
1 Y~ `'.odic»
- :•.t '~rL,:•u~r _ .i F
¢:8
m}'
~
i5tal
1,905.95
10647
12/15/2006 001090 NORTHWEST SIGNAL SUPPLY INC.
21777 1)YDMt
41364
QUOTE NO.0028-06CONTROLLERC
3,583.80
Total :
3,583.80
10648
12/1512006 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC.
364865841-001
41413
Item 825-190--
2.97
Total :
2:97.
10649
12/15,2006 000307 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER
12142006
STATE REMITTANCES
52,984.47
Total :
52,984.47
10650
1211512006 000512 OFFICETEAM
17016043
SERVICES FOR KIMBERLY WILLIAP
709.50
17024990
SERVICES FOR ANGELA FINCH
511.50
17336649
SERVICES FOR LANCE PECHT
362.88
Total :
1,583.88
10651
12/15/2006 000899 ONEEIGHTY NETWORKS
549228
SERVICE FOR CITY.HALL & CENTE
828.18
Total :
828.18
10652
12/1512006 001197 PECHT, LANCE
12142006
REIMBURSEMENT
27.15
Total :
27.15
10853
12/15/2006 000494 PRO PEOPLE STAFFING SERV INC.
18,372
SERVICES FOR CENTERPLACE
1,451.10
Total :
1,451.10
10654
12115/2006 001161 PROVISIONAL STAFFING SERVICES
3008-0500013952
SERVICES FOR MATT KUSHNER
1
023.20
3008-0509013998
SERVICES FOR MATT KUSHNER
,
1,023.20
Total :
2,046.40
10655
12115/2006 000019 PURRFECT LOGOS, INC.
17714
41388
VEHICLE LOGOS
86.88
Total :
86.88
10656.
12/15/2006 000341 RICOH CORPORATION
07000890141
COPIER PAYMENT
238.92
07011875977
COPIER PAYMENT
246.53
07011876246
COPIER PAYMENT
412.68
-Total :
898.13
,e:
4
J
vchlist
Voucher List
1211512006
4:49:58PM
Spokane Valley
Page: 5
Bank code :
apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoico PO #
10657
12/1512006 000415 -ROSAUERS U-CITY INC
Description/Account'
Amount
.
-
12112006
ACCOUNT PAYMENT
38.72
10658
12/15/2006'000064 SCHIMMELS, GARY
12112006
Total :
38.72
-
QUARTERLY CELL PHONE REIMBL
105.00
10659
12/15/2006 000709 SENSKE LAWN & TREE CARE INC.
12152006
Total :
105.00
• - -
VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PRO(
68.50
10660
12/15/2006 0011'58 .SIENKNECH
T, AMY
12142006'
Total :
68.50
~ •
•
REIMBURSEM_ ENT
38.99
• 10661
12/15/2006 001140 SPECIAL ASPHALT PRODUCTS
invoo37466
Total :
38.99
41414
QUOTE NO. 0031-06 COLD MIX
733.06
10662
12/15/2006 000230 SPOKANE CNTYAUDITORS OFC
RECO 12112006
Total :
'
733.06
•
,
STATEMENT DATE 11/312006
335.00
10563-
12/15/2006 000090 SPOKANE COUNTY INFORMATION
SY
S 61349
Total :
335.00
,
SEPTEMBER 2006 BILLING
13,905.41
10664
12/15/2006 000308 SPOKANE COUNTY PROSECUTING
An 12142008 '
Total :
13,905.41
,
REMITTANCE FOR CRIME VICTIMS
793.72
10665
12/1512006 000323' SPOKANE COUNTY UTILITIES
12142006
Total :
'
793.72
•
BILLING DATE 12/1/2006
1,515.55
10666
'
12/1512006 000324 SPOKANE COUNTY WATER DIST. #3
12112006
Total :
1,515.55
BILLING DATE 1218/2006
6.75
10667
12/15/2006 000898 SPOKANE PROCARE
12152006
Total :
6.75
41012
LANDSCAPE & WEED SPRAYINGS
4,080.65
10668
12/1512006 000406 SPOKANE REGIONAL CVB
11-06 v contract
Total :
4,080.65
MARKETING CONTRACT
13,810.00
10669
12/1512006 000419 SUMMIT LAW GROUP
Total :
13,810.00
.
32380
BILLING THROUGH 111301200E
110.00
Total :
110.00
Page: 5
vchlist
1211512006
4:49:58PM
Voucher List
Spokane Valley
Page: 6
Bank code :
apbank
Voucher
Date Vcndor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account' •
Amount
10670
1211512006 0010063 TAYLOR, STEVE
12112006
QUARTERLY CELL PHONE REIMBL
105.00
Total :
105.00
10671
12/15/2006 001024 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST
61483.867-001 41305
UNITED RENTAL.OPEN FOR MISC.
7.33-
960476 •
STATEMENT DATE 11120/06
666.00
Total :
673.33
10672
1211512006 000723 US HEALTH WORKS MEDICAL, GROUP
0157813-wa
TESTING FOR MARY K. MARTIN
115.00
Total :
115.00
10673
12115/2006 000167 VERA WATER & POWER
12112006
BILLING DATES 11129/2006-12/71201
2,171.71
12142006
BILLING DATE 11/22/2006
22.70
12142006-2
-BILLING DATE 12/11/2006 -
19.48
Total :
2,213.89
10674
12115/2006 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE
0034527-2681-7
WASTE CHARGES
60.62
0036502-1516-3
WASTE SERVICES
666.44
1846356-2681-7
WASTE SERVICES
313.33
Total :
1,040.39
10675
12/15/2006 000061 WILHITE, DIANA
12112006
QUARTERLY CELL PHONE REIMBL
105.00
12152006
REIMBURSEMENT
855.91
Total :
960.91
10676
12/15/2006 000089 XO COMMUNICATIONS, INC., FILE 5055{ 0212120695
PHONE LINE-SERVICE
1,574.45
Total :
1,574.45
63
Vouchers for bank code : apbank
Bank total :
226,554.74
63
Vouchers in this report
Total vouchers :
,554.74
t
~.S s Ubl
E:
6
vchliat r Voucher List
Page: 7
1211512006 4:49:58PM Spokane-Valley
Bank cede : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor*
Invoice PO Description/Account Amount
the undersigned, do certify under-penalty of-pedury,
that the materials have been furnished, the services
rendered, or the tabor performed as described herein
and that the claim is•just, due and an unpaid obligation
against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am
authorized to authenticate and certify to said claim.
Finance Director Date
APPROVED: '
G~
Ken Thompson, T'inance Director
rlayor Wilhute
/ 0 ~
Date
Page: 7
vchlist
Vbucher-List
Page:
1
1212612006
9:19:08AM
Spokane Valley
,
.Bank code :
apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
PO #
DescriptionlAccount
Amount
10677
12/26/2006 000150 ALLIED FIRE &'SECURITY
svc280464
41424.
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
907
Total :
91.77
10678
12/26/2006 001081 ALSCO
Ispo129158
MATS-FOR CITY HALL
80.44
Total :
80.44
10679
12!2612006 000335 ALTO N'S TIRE INC.
6-21693
MAINTENANCE ON S-10
33.83
Total :
33.83
10680
12/2612006 000050 APA- INLAND EMPIRE SECTION-
12192006
SEPA TRAINING REGISTRATION
270.00
Total :
270.00
10681
12/2612006 000030 AVISTA UTILITIES
12182006
MASTER ACCOUNT 410069444
19,863.61
Total :
19,863.61
10682
12126/2006 000173 BINGAMAN, GREG
12182006-
REIMBURSEMENT
16.02
Total :
16.02
10683
12/2612006 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY, INC.
87749454
SERVICES FOR CENTERPLACE
384.91
8776862
SERVICES FOR CENTERPLACE
469.87
s0043327
SERVICES FOR CENTERPLACE
28.15
Total :
882.93
10684
12/2602006 001176 BROWN, MEL'INDA
12212006
REFUND REQUEST
.12.00
Total :
12.00
10685
12/26/2006 001139 CATS EYE EXCAVATING, INC.
144
41323
CONTRACT NO 06-022 CATS EYE f
2,727.73-
146
41323
CONTRACT NO 06-022 CATS EYE f
3,888.82
147
41323
CONTRACT.NO 06-022 CATS EYE f
3,684.14
149
41323
CONTRACT NO 06-022 CATS EYE f
2,902.78
150
41323
CONTRACT NO 06-022 CATS EYE f
323.66
T
tal:
13,527.1
3
o
_ ....:tee. 1 'r- ..:-+d s.:....M.s'~ x .al ~w~,:~
r
,
!
1
g%
.
,.a
Total :
12.60
106687
12/2612006 OD0571 CODE PUBLISHING COMPANY
27419
SUPPLEMENT UPDATE DEC. 2006
82.54
Page: 1
vchlst
Voucher List
1212612006
9:19:08AM
_'Spokane'Valley
Page: 2
Bank code:
apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
10687:•
12/26/2006 000571 CODE,.PUBLISHING COMPANY
(Continued).
27423
UPDATE FOR NOV.-DEC. 2006
26.06
Total :
108.60
10688
1212612006 000109, COFFEE SYSTEMS INC
46113
COFFEE ORDER 12115!2006
158.36
46143
COFFEE ORDER FOR CENTERPLA
76.00
Total :
234.36
10689
12/26/2006 001198 CONGRESS FOR THE NEW URBANISM
12182006
MEMBERSHIP FOR SCOTT KUHTA
185.00
Total :
165.00
10690
12/26/2006 000537 DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, IN
211928
41286
CONTRACT #06-020 DEA DEV. PLA
5,502.04
211931
41286
CONTRACT #06-020 DEA DEV. PLA
6,265.00
Total :
11,767.04
10691
1212612006 001208 DEST1TO, STACI
12212006
REFUND REQUEST
27.00
Total :
27.00
10692
12/26/2006 000059 DEVLEMING, MICHAEL
12192006
REIMBURSEMENT
28.50
Total :
28.50
10693
12/26/2006.000924 ELLER CORPORATION
12222006
41026
0004- BARKER ROAD CONSTRUCT
87,506.08
Total :
87,506.08
10694
12/26/2006 001205 _EMKEN, MICHAEL
12212006
CLASS INSTRUCTION
200.00
Total :
200.00
10695
12/26/2006 001203 FILENKO, VICTORIA
12192006
REFUND REQUEST
221.00
Total :
221.00
10696
12/2612006 001202 'FILIPINO-AMERICAN ASSOCIATONI OF
112192006
REFUND REQUEST
210.50
Total :
210.50
10697
1212612005 001113 FLOORMART
2110
FLOOR INSTALLATION AT CENTER
4,875.00
e,
; _;t T•' .
• .x TO~Iti
rC'C:yy'.:u4~a.7,$~~,~i
.10698
12/2612006 001009 GOTHMANN, WILLIAM H.
12182006
REIMBURSEMENT
1,267:29
Total :
1,267.29
2
~
y
vchlist Voucher List Page: 3
1212612006 9:19:08AM -;SOokane•Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher
Date . Vendor
Invoice
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
10699
12126/2006 000007 GRAINGER
9247030431•
41301
GRAINGER: MISC. NEEDS '
114.03
Total :
114.03
10700
12/26/2006 000002 H & H BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC.
1081
LEASE PAYMENT
201.97
152802
MONTHLY COPIER RENTAUSERVIr
55.97
152891
MONTHLY COPIER RENTAUSERVI(
93.34
152892
MONTHLY COPIER RENTAUSERVI(
41.68
152899
MONTHLY COPIER RENTAUSERVI(
24.98
152900
MONTHLY COPIER RENTAUSERVI(
21.42
152930
MONTHLY COPIER RENTAUSERVII
38.99
153015.
MONTHLY COPIER•RENTAUSERVI!
19.29
Total :
497.64
10701
12/26/2005 000009 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
41267100
HP XWB400 WORKSTATION FOR S
3,672.85
41355
Total:.
3,6
7
2.885
~t
r°R1°l1`.Z - 571 !!ms"rr'MM
+I'$
~
T~7@
7
2
Total :
328.70
10703
12/2612006 000117 JOURNAL NEWS PUBLISHING INC.'
28477
ADVERTISING
55.00
'
Total :
56.00
10704
1126/2006 001.124 LOTS-N-LAND, LLC
12202006
41273
QUOTE #0016-06, INDIANA SEWER
16,184.92
Total :
16,184.92
10705
12126/2006 001201' MARKET AMERICA, C/O ROGER HICKS
12192006
REFUND REQUEST
50.00
Total :
50.00
10706
12126/2006 000073 MC CORMICK, GREG
12212006
REIMBURSEMENT
66,75
Total :
66.75
10707
12126/2006000132 MODERN ELECTRIC WATER COMPANY
12192b06
BILLING DATE 11/22/06
34.13
12202006
BILLING DATE11/20-11/22
251.45
Total :
285.58
10708
12/26/2006 000662 NATIONAL BARRICADE & SIGN CO., OF
53781
41303
NATIONAL BARRICADE'- MISC. NEI
828.46
Page: 3
vchlist -:-..;Voucher-List Pagc: 4
1212612006 9:19:08AM .•:SpokaneValley -
Bank code : apbank
Voucher.
Date Vendor. Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amount
10708
12126/2006 000662 ' 000662 NATIONAL BARRICADE & SIGN CO., (Continued)
Total :
828.46
10709
12/26/2006 000283 NATIONAL RECREATION & PARK, ASSO 20024700 41394
PUBLICATIONS.
192.00
Total :
192.00
10710
12/26/2006 001035 .NETWORK DESIGN & MANAGEMENT 14693 41420
SENTINEL IPS APPLIANCE
1,905.95 '
Total :
1,905.95
10711.
12/26/2005.001-199"NOLL, JANINE 12182006
REFUND REQUEST
175 00
10712 12126/2006000058 OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE, ASSOCIATE 1282006
10713
10714
10715
10716
10717
10718
10719
12/2612006 000036 OFFICE DEPOT CREDIT PLAN
12/26/2006 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC.
112126/20G6.000512 OFFICETEAM
1212612006 001200 OXARC FIRE
12/2612006 001204 POWELL, DOUGLAS
12192006
366542962-001
36672601:-001':
366813044001
12126/2006 000494' PRO PEOPLE STAFFING SERV INC.
12/26/2006 001161 PROVISIONAL STAFFING SERVICES
17372057
17383380
17387361
12192006
12202006
18,560
3008-0500014048
Total :
175.00
PRE-EMPLOYMENT TESTING
101.00
Total :
101.00
ACCT. NO.# 6011565610072627
798.69
Total :
798.69
OFFICE SUPPLIES
139.84
41421-`--"`•`•`''f'. OFFICE'SUPPLIES`FOR`SUE-f"!'''''"`''"'
41422 EASEL
53.25
Total :
23641
SERVICES FOR ANGELA FINCH
660.00
SERVICES FOR LANCE PECHT
604.80
SERVICES FOR KIMBERLY WILLIAI
660.00
Total :
1,924.80
REFUND REQUEST
100.00
Total :
100.00
REIMBURSEMENT
170.00
Tota l :
170.00
SERVICES FOR CENTERPLACE
1,167.97
Total :
1,167.97
SERVICES FOR MATT KUSHNER
920.88
Total :
920.88
vchlist
-
1.v0L._a&.List
j
.-age: 5
12!2612006
9:19:08AM
Spokane•Valley
Bank code :
apbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Descrilition/Accotint•• Amount
10720
1212612006 000019 PURRFECT LOGOS, INC.
17712 41429
-OPERATING SUPPLIES 99.91
Total : 99.91
10721
12/2612006 000601 RERC
12182000"
MEMBER SHIP FOR GREG MCCOR 75.00
10722
10723
10724
10725
10726
Total : 75.00
12/2612006 001186 SCHOONOVER, KIM 122120136 REFUND REQUEST 24.00
Total : 24.00
12/26/2006 000935 SERVICE PAPER COMPANY 30388079 41429 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 575.63
Total : 575.63
12126/2006 001207 SLAZINIK, COURTNEY 12212006 REFUND.REQUEST. 25.00
1212612006 000230 SPOKANE CNTY AUDITORS OFC, RECO 12182006
12/26/2006 000172 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER viy0610
VIy0610
10727 12/26/2006 000424 SPOKANE COUNTY UTILITES, STORMW csv2006-406 .
10728 1212612008 000324 SPOKANE COUNTY WATER DIST. #3 12222006
10729 12/2612006 001159 SPOKANE PUMP INC. 0180012
10730 12/2612006 001083 STANDARD PLUMBING HEATING;'CONT 22685
10731 1212612008 000773 STUDIO CASCADE, INC. 1122
- Total :
25.00
RECORDING FEES
811.00
Total :
811.00
MONTHLY INVOICE-OCT. 9, 2006
92,383.87
40937 PINES/MANSFIELO MOU WITH COL
19,828.10
40937
Total :
112,211.97
STORMWATER DECANT
392.87
Total :
392.87
WATER BILLING DATE 12/15/2006
567.30
Total :
567.30
41354 QUOTE #0025-06 'PUMP- REPAIR SF
7,593.57
Total
7,593.57
PUMP FOR.CENTERPLACE
541.91
Total :
541.91
PLANNING SERVICES
3,740.00•
Total :
3,740.00
Page: 5
vchlist . Voucher List Page: 6
1212612006 -9:19:08AM . Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank ,
Voucher . Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount
10732
12/26/2006 001206 SWANSON'S REFRIGERATION RES' V 19215
KITCHEN MAINTENANCE-FOR CEN.
226.74
Total :
226.74
10733
12/26/2006 000576 THOMSON WEST
812721432
20137 WA COURT RULES STATE, FE
122.72
Total
122.72
10734
12126/2006 001024 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST
61483867-001
41305 UNITED RENTAL OPEN FOR MISC.
7.33
Total :
7.33'
10735
12/2612006 000167 VERA WATER & POWER
12192006
BILLING DATE 12112-1211412006
207.96
1222006
BILLING DATES_ 12/14-1212012006
297.92
Total :
505.90
10736
12/2612006 000980 WESTERN SYSTEMS
10001431
41249 QUOTE #0007-06 PTR SIGN
2,780.16
Total :
2,780.16
60 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 301,499.14
60 Vouchers in this-report
- APPROVED:
I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury,
that the materials have. been fumished,: the.services
rendered, or the labor performed as described herein .
and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation
against the City of Spokane Valley, and-that I am
authorized to authenticate and certify to said claim.
Finance Director
Date
Ken Thompson, Finance Director
Mayor Wijhite
Total vouchers : 301,499.14
Date
Pafle: 6
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 01-09-07 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: x consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE :
Payroll for Period Ending December 15, 2006
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND:
r_`,
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
Gross: $ 145,642.08
Benefits: $ 15,750.08
TOTAL PAYROLL: $ 161,392.16
STAFF CONTACT: Jason Faulkner
ATTACHMENTS
J
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 01-09-07 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: x consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE :
Payroll for Period Ending December 31, 2006
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND:
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
Gross: $ 144,748.72
Benefits: $ 74,872.22_
TOTAL PAYROLL: $ 219,620.94
STAFF CONTACT: Jason Faulkner
ATTACHMENTS
1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 01-09-07 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE:. Ratify January 2, 2007 City Hall Closure
BACKGROUND: On December 28, 2006, by Executive Order, President George W. Bush declared
that all executive departments, independent organizations and other agencies of the Federal government
shall be closed on Tuesday, :January 2, 2007, as a mark of respect for Gerald R. Ford, the 3 $°i President
of the United States.
.,or issued an announcement that President Bush declared January 2, 2007 as a
Deputy City Manager Reg
National.Day of Mourning and as a result, we would close our City Hall that day, and that there would be
no Council meeting that evening.
t
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to ratify the decision to close City Hall
January 2, 2007, in observance of a day of mourning for former President Gerald R. Ford.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT:
ATTACHMENTS
DRAFT
AfM TES
City of Spokane Valley
City Council Regular Meeting
Tuesday, December 1-2, 2006
Mayor Wilhite called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m., and welcomed everyone to the 106'' meeting.
Attendance:
Diana Wilhite, Mayor
Steve Taylor, Deputy Mayor
Mike DeVleming, Councilmember
Dick Denenny, Councilmembcr
Bill Gothmann, Councilmember
Rich Munson. Councilmember
Gary Schimmels, Councilmember
City Staff.
Davd Mercier, City Manager
Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager
Mike Connelly, City Attorney
Ken Thompson, Finance Director
Mike Jackson, Parks & Rec Director
Greg McCormick, Planning Manager
Neil Kersten, Public Works Director
Cary DriskelI, Deputy City Attorney
Scott Kuhta, Senior Planner
Greg Bingaman, IT Specialist
Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk
INVOCATION: Councilmember Munson gave the invocation.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGLANCE: Mayor Wilhite led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL. CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called roll; all councilmembers were present.
APPROVAL OF AGF\'nA: It was roved by Deputy rlfayor Taylor, seconded and unanimously passed
to approve the agenda. -
INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: None.
COMATITTEE, BOARD, LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS: `
Councilmember Schimmels: spoke of the Spokane Valley Arts Council meeting he attended about a
month ago.
Councilmember Denenny: reported that he attended last week's Health Board meeting and that the board
is doing well with their transition; and that he represented the Mayor by attending a reception for Critical
Lodging, a company moving here.from California.
Depuh' Mayor Taylor: mentioned that he attended a tour this morning of formal housing projects in
Spokane Valley hosted by the Spokane Low Income Consortium;
Councilmember Gothmann: stated that lie also attended the Flealth Board meeting where the board
members were updated on different health concerns in the community; that he also attended the National
League of Cities (NLC) conference in Reno, and of special interest was a session on seniors and how they
are becoming an increasingly large segment of our community, and he mentioned it would be a great idea
to pursue the development of an advisory group to provide the city with information or comments relative
to the senior population.
Councilmember Munson: reported that he also attended the NLC where he attended a workshop on re-
tracking and*how to apply some of those concepts to our building codes or if they are applicable and
workable; that he met today with the Spokane Transit Authority which discussed budget, adding that they
anticipate a 4% increase in sales tax for neat year.
Council Meeting: 12-12-06 Pale 1- of 7
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
MAYOR'S REPORT:
Mayor Wilhite reported that she attended the celebration of Spokane's 125 h birthday; she chaired her last
meeting as Chair of the NE Mayor's Association; she also attended the NL:C convention in Reno; and this
afternoon she graveled to Central Valley High School to join Washington's Governor as she made an
announcement on initiating programs of math and science, and of her intent to work toward amending the
Washington State Constitution to allow school bonds to pass with a simple majority.
PUBLIC COM-MENTS:
Gail Stiltner, 10119 E 44`s Avenue: remarked that she wanted to share a viewpoint; that concerning the
survey work started on 440' Ave in Ponderosa regarding a bike and walkway, that many residents were
aware something was going to happen but not aware of exactly what or when; and when surveyors started
their work interest mounted throughout the community and questions were raised; that she expressed
thanks to Mr. Worley and Mr. Stamatoplos for their help, but she would like the City to be mindful of
how important these projects are to the area residents and how the projects will affect them; like the need
for it road in and out of the community and that it is more important than a walkway. She stated that she
realizes citizen input will be taken but fears it may be given at a time too late and she would rather citizen
input be placed in the forefront of the planning process, and would like to see such a procedure put in
place.
1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. A
Councilmember may remove an item from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately.
a. Following Claim Vouchers:
VOUCHER LIST DATE
VOUCHER #s
TOTAL VOUCHER
A 4OUNTT
11-30-2006
10473-10474; 10486-10549
284 067.23
11-30-2006
104184-10485
1480 823.20
GRAND TO'1"A1.
1,764 890.43
b. Payroll for Period Ending November 30, 2006: $216,977.46
c. Minutes of November 28, 2006 Council Regular Meeting
.Il was moved by Deputy AfeVor Taylor, seconded and unanimously ggreed to approve the consent
agenda.
NEW BUSK TESS _
2. Second Reading Ordinance 06-028 Amending 2006 Budeet -Ken Thomason
After City Clerk read the ordinance title, it uvas proved by Deputy Mayor Taylor and seconded to approve
Ordinance 06-025 amending the 2006.budget. Finance Director Thompson went through his Power-Point
presentation explaining the proposed changes in revenue and resulting budget adjustments; and added that
there have been no changes since the ordinance's first reading. Mayor Wilhite invited public comment;
no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. .Abstentions:
None, tlfotion carried
3. Second 1teadin Proposed Ordinance 06-029 Amending SVMC 2.50 -Nina Regor
After City Clerk read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Taylor and seconded, to approve
Ordinance 06-029. Deputy City Manager Regor explained that at previous meetings, staff proposed some
potential updates to the Code and this ordinance incorporates those changes; e.g. adding sections to
address nepotism, conflict of interest, and violence in the workplace; adding that the only change to the
ordinance since the first reading is to correct a scrivener's error. Mayor Wilhite invited public comment;
no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor.: Unanimous. Opposed.: None. Abstentions:
Alone. Molion carried.
Council Meeting: 12-12-06 Page 2 of 7
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
4. Proposed Resolution 06-025 Replacing 03-015 --Nina Regor
After City Clerk Bainbridge read the resolution title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Taylor and seconded
to approve Resolution 06-025. Deputy City Manager Regor explained that this resolution would replace
resolution 03-015 which identified insurance plans that the city wanted to offer, and includes a new
proposal to add the option of a premium only plan, which would allow the employee or Council member
to pay their share of the premium costs using pre-tax income. Brief discussion included the mention that
not all councilmembers elect to participate in the medical plan; and that the first new paragraph under
section l speaks to employees and not councilmembers, Mayor Wilhite invited public comment. \b
comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Fcn~or: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions:
.None. Motion carried.
5. Proposed Resolution 06-026 Replacing 04-020 -Nina Regor
After City Clerk Bainbridge read the resolution title, it was moved by Deputy Taylor and seconded to
approve resolution 06-026. Deputy City Manager Regor noted that all proposed changes are
housekeeping in nature, but do represent more changes than were seen in September, specifically section
3 concerning sick leave. Ms. Regor explained that rather than list the uses of sick leave, the state
regulations of RCW 49.12 and WAC 296-130 are referenced. Mayor Wilhite invited public comment; no
comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed, None. Abstentions:
None. .Motion carried.
6. Motion Consideration: Urban Growth Area (UGA) Defined - Scott Kuhta
it was moved by Deputy Mayor Taylor and seconded to request the City of Spokane Valley Urban
Growth Areas as recommended by the Spokane Valley Planning Commission including the following
additional properties or areas (as displayed on the map entitled "City Council UGA Analysis'): CCR-1,
i CCR-2a; CCR-2b; and CCR-3.
Senior Planner Kuhta explained the process and discussed the various potential UGAs as shown on the
"City Council UGA Analysis" map. Mr. Kuhta also made reference to a letter from Kim A. McGogney-
Linke requesting a revision of parcels situaied at 17811 32"d Avenue, close to the Morning Side
Development; requesting a change from their current status or Urban Reserve, to Urban Growth. Mr.
Kuhta said that the area is in the urban reserve area but outside our UGA. Discussion followed on
population allocations and areas; preserving the natural state of the Ponderosa area; zoning designations
and mention that we do not have a comparable zone to "rural conversation" as Mr. Kuhta explained if the
property is to remain rural, it should remain in the County. Mayor Wilhite invited public comment.
PUBLIC CONCMENT:
Stacy Bjordahl, 422 W Riverside, Spokane: said she speaks on behalf of four different property owners:
Bud Morrison, Jack Kestell, Ken Tupper, and Viktor Sizov, and said that letters have been submitted
regarding those properties; that regarding the assumption of density in particular the low density
residential zone; she stated that the land capacity analysis assumes, develop ina at four units per acre; that
in the public hearings held last year, the number one complaint was that four units per acre is too dense;
and that developers are trying to go to the maximum in order to have lots available to build and sell; and
she asks that Council go back and look at the assumption, especially on city lots where there Nvill be infill
development, to see if four units per development acre is realistic on a one-acre lot; and that maybe two to
three per acre would be more appropriate, realistic and more consistent with how environment is
developed here. She added that there is a case that says if you have a private covenant that restricts
density or prohibits further lot development in terms of subdivision, it won't be developed; and that there
are a lot of already developed existing lots in the Valley. She mentioned that regarding the specific areas
that have been designated, a lot of those areas arc cases where the property owner did not request to be
` included in the UGA; and there are other property owners who have asked to be in the UGA and they are
not in tonight's proposal; and that it would be inconsistent to think that the areas are being designated
Council Meeting: 12-12-06 Page 3 of 7
Approved by Council:
DRAf'•T
without a request, that those areas will be developed; and if a property owner is really and willing to
develop, they would make such a request to be part of the City's UGA, which has not been done; and that
those areas include the areas of Plantes Perry, the NF rdgecliff area, Ponderosa, and some of the south
east portions. Ms. Bjordahl mentioned that many areas proposed to be included are not consistent with the
Growth Management Act, because the GNiA states when the area is designated, you first look to areas
where there are services available, sewer lines in place and an area characterized by urban brrowth; and in
particular in looking at Plantes Ferry, staffs report said that none of that area is sewered, yet that is an
area to be included in the UGA. Coneurrency would also be a problem, she stated, and she feels the
record does not support those areas being included in the UGA; and she asks that Council look at the
assumptions and the specific requests submitted and to perhaps re-evaluate those areas.
Mayor Wilhite invited further public comment; no other comments were offered.
Councilmember Munson mentioned the importance of time and that there must be forward movement or
we could be in violation of the CTED rules and possibly lose some C1`I;D funding; and he prefers to go
with staff's recommendations. Councilmember Gothmann added that he has a concern with the CCR-3
area and that Cities are not allowed to designate Waal areas; and that particular area needs to be a
conservation area and is exactly the same area as the Dishman Hills conservation area, and that he
proposes to exclude CCR3 from this consideration.
Deputy Mayor Taylor asked Mr. Kuhta what the Planning Commission considered and what was their
process in terms of individual requests to be included in the UGA. Mr. Ku}ata explained that all letters
were forwarded to the Planning Commission; that the County also received requests and input; and all
that information was given to the Planning Commission which resulted in staff forming a boundary that
tried to incorporate as many requests as reasonable; keeping in mind the need to accommodate 33,000
citizens; and that afterwards the Planning Commission made their recommendation. Mr. Kuhta explained
that forwarding this boundary is not the end of the process, as a full capital facilities analysis must be
completed which might show that areas need to be revised; that this will go forward through our Comp
Plan Amendment process with a full capital facilities plan amendment as well. In response to questions
about what is considered when evaluating these requests, Mr. Kuhta added that transportation impacts
must be considered, and that there. are currently levels of service problems at Sullivan and Pines; that
there is currently a large UGA on the southeast area; that this boundary and the capital facilities analysis
must also go before the Spokane Regional Transportation Council, which will send us some modeling
reports, and if the impacts are not severe, it might be appropriate to add more land if needed.
Councilmember Munson asked regarding the CCR2b area, if the cities of Liberty Lake and Spokane
Valley both ask for that area, what type of conflict resolution can be expected. Mr. Kuhta said if council
recommends asking for that CCR2b area, discussions should be held with Liberty Lake giving them our
reasons why we are requesting this area, and the decision ultimately goes to the County as arbitrator, and
the County could designate it for growth for Liberty Lake, or for Spokane Valley, or a three-way joint
planning area. In response to a question concerning how the units per acre are calculated, Planning
Manager McCormick explained that it refers to the assumption that low density residential would be four
units per acre; and that that is the regional methodology to do land analysis and not something as a result
of a court case or staff recommendation, but is a regional methodology that every city within the County,
and the County also, calculates land capacity; but that we are not proposing a minimum density of any
zoning we are developing; and the current zoning densities are maximum designations. Senior Planner
Kuhta added that staff will forward copies of Planning Commission minutes, as well as citizen's letters, to
council concerning this issue.
Mayor Wilhite expressed her view that concerning the CCR3 area, she said there is not a lot of good
developable land there although there is some development there, but her concern is that the Ponderosa
Council Meeting: 12-12-06 Page 4 of 7
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
has been looking at an access road and feels that would occur quicker if the area were under the City's
control; and that those citizens would be under our police response time rather than the County's as the
citizens would likely feel that would be beneficial; and that she does not want to see this land developed
as high density but does see a need for the area to be included in the city limits to address development
issues.
Councilmember Gothmann asked if it would be possible to designate that area, or part of that area as an
urban conservation area. Mr. Kuhta said that would be possible through a comp plan amendment and
creating a new category for this one specific piece of ground. Deputy Mayor Taylor said that he feels
there would be more pressure to develop that area to a non-rural standard if it was within our UGA;
whereas if it remains in County rural conservation there would be less pressure to do so. Councilmember
Denenny questioned why we would be bringing in something that does not add to an area that would
accommodate population; but rather cooperation by joint planning might better fulfill the needs of the
area. City Attorney Connelly said that the recommendation we are sending to the Steering Committee is
urban gowth areas, which are designated as areas where urban growth is expected to occur; so urban
conservation areas is a different topic; and if Council would like to build a road or protect an area, there
are other avenues to work toward those pursuits.
Deputy Mayor Taylor said he would like to amend his motion (friendly amendment) to remove the CCR3
area; seconder accepted that friendly amendment. City Clerk Bainbridge reiterated the new motion: to
request the City of .Spnkone Valley Urban Growth Areas as recommended by the Spokane Pulley
Planning Con?rnission including the following additional properties or areas (as displayed on the map
entitled "City Council UGA Analysis'): CC,R-1, CCR-2a; CCR-2b. Councilmember DeVleming added
that he would still like to review the relevant letters and the specific portions of the Planning Commission
minutes that address this issue. Discussion ensued concerning the process. City Attorney Connelly stated
~J that the timing of the recommendation is not clear and we will need further direction from the County;
although it appeared the Steering Committee wanted those recommendations immediately, before
formally arending our comprehensive plan. Mr. Kuhui further explained that the final process should
include us amending our comprehensive plan to include those areas, which would then be forwarded
through with the County making the final determination. Mr. Kuhta also explained that the bi-frication
part of this action is that the County is trying to get all of their comp plan updated, including UGAs in
their five-year update; they split-off the UGA discussion from the rest of the comp plan amendments
which is mostly text amendments and some land use changes within the existing UGA; so the County has
taken this UGA process and will be moving it forward through 2007; and that is where we get to this
discussion of timing, and what goes first, and he hopes the meeting this week will answer those questions.
Mr. Connelly explained that if council desired, we could wait a week until we have more information, and
include this matter on next week's agenda. After council discussion, Deputy Mayor "Taylor withdrew his
motion and the seconder accepted.
City Manager Mercier said that the additional information for council would include copies of letters
received from property owners and presented to the Planning Commission. Iv r. Connelly added that prior
to staff drafting a facilities analysis, first specific UGA's must be selected, then staff can do their analysis
on those WAS for further presentation to Council. Mr. Mercier also added that because we require
modeling information from SRTC, we are looking at a two or three month process to come back with this
information, but can provide council with copies of letters for next week's council meeting. Mayor
Wilhite said that council will ruminate this issue until the next council meeting, which will also give
councilmembers an opportunity to further think about these areas; and hope to hear about the outcome
from the steering committee meeting. Deputy Mayor Taylor reiterated the need for all councilmembers to
do careful analysis of letters and whatever other documents necessary to help make a determination.
Council Meeting: 12-12-06 Page 5 of 7
Approved by Council:
DRAY F
Mayor Wilhite called for a recess at 7:25 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 7:35 p.m.
7. Motion Consideration: A.ppleway Corridor- Dave Mercier/Mike Connelly
City Attorney Connelly explained that by letter dated November 15, 2006, the City recently asked the
County to acknowledge the City's ownership of the proposed Appleway extension; and by Spokane
County's letter dated December 5, 2006, they refused to do so. Mr. Connelly said that the position of
Spokane County appears to be that this dedicated road, as opposed to other roadways within the City of
Spokane Valley, did not revert to the City upon incorporation; and that it is the City's position that the
roadway did revert upon incorporation; and that it is clear that the failure to resolve this dispute could
adversely impact pending $4 million dollars in federal funds on that road's improvement, and of the
development of the City Center, which is at least in part adjacent to the roadway in question. The options
before Council, Mr. Connelly explained are to (1) authorize the initiation of a suit, (2) seek an agreement
for mediation or arbitration, (3) continue negotiations, or (4) take no action. It was moved by Mayor
Wilhite and seconded by Deputy Alcryor Taylor that we authorize the initiation of an action in Spokane
County Superior Court to resolve existing disputes as to ownership of the proposed Appletivay Extension.
Mayor Wilhite invited public comment. Tony Lazanis, 10626 E Empire: said he thinks we should go
with the lawsuit; and take over the sewers too; that we have spent enough time on this and should own the
sewers to benefit the Valley and the people. Vote by Acclamation after brief council discussion: Li favor:
Unanimous. Opposer!: None. Abstentions: drone. Motion carried.
3. Motion Consideration: L odgina Tax Grant Allocations - DepUly Ma yo} r Taylor
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Taylor and .seconded, to allocate the fithding recommendations as listed:
Spokane County Fair & .Frpo Center $20, 000; Spokane Regional Convention/Visitor's Bureau ,S17S, 000;
Spokane Regional Sports Commission $100,000; Spokane Valley heritage Wuseran $10,000; Vallelfest
$25, 000; Six .Brielges Arts Association ,512, 500; and CenteYPlace $40, 000. Mayor Wilhite invited public
comment. Tony Lazanis: said he would like the City to keep S 150,000 to put up a tourism facility around
the mall; that it could be a*small building so tourists can have coffee, and that we use that money much
wiser than we are doing now. After brief council discussion concerning the idea of additional proposals
in the spring, and the reserves, Council voted by acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed.: Alone.
Abstentions: None. Alotion carried
9. Ma orL al Appointments: Committees. Planning Commission - Mayor Wilhite
Mayor Wilhite explained that there are several committees and commissions which have members whose
terms expire the end.of the year; and that the openings on the Planning Commissioner were advertised,
but no one other than the incumbents expressed a desire to be on that commission. Mayor Wilhite stated
that she spoke with each councihnember and some are in the middle of situations and requested no
change be made; but that she did make a proposed change to the Finance Committee, removing her name
and adding Mr. DeVleming's; and likewise proposed changing the SR.TC (Spokane Regional
Transportation Council), removing Mr. DeVleming's name and adding hers. It was moved by
Councilmember Munson and seconded to approve the appointments to the various boards and committees
as noted on the accompanying list, [which list is attached to the final approved minutes] which includes
the Planning Commission appointments. Mayor Wilhite invited public comment; no comments were
offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: [lone. Abstentions: None. Alotion
carried
PUBLIC CONIHNIFNITS. Mayor Wilhite invited general public comments. No comments were offered.
ADMLNISTRATTVF REPORTS:
10. Dangerous Dog Appeal - Cary Driskell
Deputy City Attorney Driskell gave a brief history and background on handling appeals concerning
dangerous or potentially dangerous dogs; and that the Board of County Commissioners informed us that it
Council Meeting: 12-12-06 Page 6 of 7
Approved by Council: b
ORA- T
will not handle such appeals in the future; and as a result, Council needs to determine how to
administratively handle those future determinations. After Attorney Driskell explained, and Council
discussed the four options (as per his December 5, 2006 memorandum), it was council consensus to
choose the option that Council amend Spokane Valley Municipal Code 7.30.010 and .030 so that appeals
go from SCRAPS (Nancy Hill) with review by the Hearing Examiner on behalf of the City; and that the
decision by the Hearing Examiner would be final with any appeal taken directly to Superior Court. Mr.
Driskell will prepare a draft ordinance for a future council meeting.
11. Uniform Development Code (UDC) Title 17, 18, and 20 - Greg McCormick
Planning Manager McCormick went through his PowerPoint presentation explaining the general concepts
and provisions contained in three Uniform Development Codes: Title 17- General Provisions; Title 18-
Boards & Authorities; and Title 20 - Subdivisions. Discussion ensued regarding the Council's process of
discussing these titles, with Councilmember DeVleming stating his preference to have more of a round-
table type discussion of these issues. Councilmember Denenny asked if staff could identify which items
are necessary as per state statutes and therefore would not be susceptible to change, and which sections
are more flexible and open to change. Mr. Mercier remarked that while "Titles 19 and 22 will require
more in-depth discussion as those contain the bulk of policy concerns, perhaps in dealing with these
materials, Councilmembers can mark those items they -want conversation about, and send those comments
to staff who can then gather all remarks into one document for further discussion; and as such, Mr.
Mercier asked if Council would submit their materials (comments on titles 17, 18 and 20) to Chris
Bainbridge in preparation for the January 2 meeting. Council concurred.
There being no further business, it was proved by Cowicilmember DeVleming, seconded, and unanimously
J agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 8:23 p.m.
ATTEST:
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
i
Diana Wilhite, Mayor
Council Meeting: 12-12-06 Page 7 of 7
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
iI TINWES
0 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
Tuesday, December 19, 2006
Mayor Wilhite called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m., and welcomed everyone to the meeting.
Present:
Councilmembers: Staff:
Diana Wilhite, Mayor Dave Mercier, City Manager
Steve Taylor, Deputy Mayor Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager
Mike DeVleming, Councilmember Mike Connelly, City Attorney
Dick Denen.ny, Councilmember Neil Kersten, Public Works Director
Bill Gothmann, Councilmember Mike Jackson, Parks & Rec Director
Rich Munson, Councilmember Scott Kuhta, Senior Planner
Gary Schimmels, Councilmember Greg McCormick, Planning Managef
Carolbelle Branch, Public Information Officer
Greg Bingaman,IT Specialist
Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk
1. Mayoral Appointment: Spokane County Housing and Community Development Advisory Board -
Mayor Wilhite
Mayor Wilhite explained that these appointments are generally made during regular council meetings;
however, this Board's work is accumulating and the vacancy needs to be filled now to give the new
appointee ample opportunity to review documents associated with Community Development grants.
Mayor Wilhite stated that she intends to appoint Rick Scott: to this vacancy; and asked fora motion to
confirm that appointment. It was moved by Councilmember Cothmann, seconded, and unonimously
agreed to confirm the Mayor's appointment of Rick Scott to the Spokane County Housing and C'onunienity
Development Advisory Board. Rick Scott was in attendance and thanked Councilmembers for their trust
in him in making this appointment.
2. Economic Development Council (EDC) 2006 Third Ouarter R.eoort - Jim Huttenmaier
Partner Relations Director Jim Huttetnmaier thanked Council for the opportunity to present the EDC's
2006 Third Quarter report, and then introduced Pat Smith, Manager of Health Care Resources group, a
company the EDC assisted moving into the Pinecroft Business Park; and also introduced Robin 'l'oth,
EDC Director of Funding and Community Projects. Ms. Smith theft gave a history of her company and
how it originated in Sandpoint, Idaho, of their decision to open an office here in the Valley and 41 several
other states, of how it has grown, and of her appreciation of the ]:DC's assistance. Mr. Huttenmaier then
spoke of the Third Quarter 2006 Key results, followed by remarks from Ms. Toth of the work force and
integration of the EDC and the Spokane Chamber. Council extended their thanks for the update.
3. Parks 2007 Capital Program - Mike Jackson
Parks and Recreation Director Jackson explained that in working within the 2007 Parks Capital Projects
Budget, staff developed a list of recommended projects, which projects also follow the general
recommendations of the Parks and Recreation MasterPlan adopted last April. Via his PowerPoint
presentation, Mr. Jackson explained that staff recommends the top three priorities as upgrading the
existing park facilities, making aquatic improvements, and acquiring land. City Manager Mercier added
that the governor's budget was released today and in it, the Governor plans $70 million in funding for
IAC type projects, which is the entity that finds many of the park and recreation acquisition requests that
go before the state; that we filed an application and we were ranked In out of 69 projects; and that we
anticipate receiving verification of funding by the end of next week.
Meeting ,Minutes: 12-19-06 Page 1 of it
Approved by Council:
DR4ET
Mr. Jackson mentioned that some of the project funding would be from REET, and he can provide those
figures later to Council. Council/staff discussion included the need for security lights; neighborhood parks
and areas that have a school within a half.-mail radius; that the Greenacres area is the highest priority in
the plans for a neighborhood park; parking in iMirabeau and mention that a property owner in the area is
considering building a restaurant in that location which might lead to an opportunity to work with them
for parking; that staff plans to apply for grant funds to develop the park in 2008; how these projects fit in
with each department's and the City's overall business plan; the public's desire for facility improvements,
and that Parks and Rec staff will follow the Parks and Recreation Masterplan as their business plan for
park development as they put the projects together.
4. Proposed Urban GroNvth Area Defined - Scott Kuhut and Gn,,, McCormick
Senior Planner Kuhta mentioned that at the last council meeting during council's review of some new
information, Council asked that staff provide Council with copies of all citizen letters received by the
Planning Commission along with the Planning Commission relevant meeting minutes; and that the
minutes were distributed separately tonight; but the letters are contained in tonight's council packet. It
was also mentioned that Mr. McCormick attended last week's Planning Directors' Meeting to discuss the
process to get the urban growth update finalised and through the County's process, and that another
meeting is set for this Thursday to further discuss the process with the hope of finalizing exactly how the
UGA upgrades are accomplished. In further regard to process, Mr. Kulhta stated that the development of
the capital facilities analysis would be based on the map the Planning Commission recommended,
including some of the areas Council asked staff to add, and if additional lands should be considered; staff
would need to know that as well; and that this would move forward through the Comprehensive Plan
amendment process and then through the County; adding that the County is not pushing an end-of the-
year deadline, and staff is also not now trying to finalize this by the end of this year. Councilmember
DeVleming asked staff to indicate which citizen letters were approved or denied with a brief explanation
of the reason for such decision; and Deputy Mayor Taylor asked that staff prepare a map showing where
we are with our current proposed areas. Further discussion included the Painted Hills Area; the southeast
portion of Morningside area; areas on the northeast; how far on the Forker area; and that these items need
to be discussed with the rationale and guidance from staff on why or why not to include what areas. Mr.
Kuhta mentioned that some of the areas are ones which we think Spokane Valley would grow into and be
annexed over the years; but we will need to look at how such annexation would benefit our city, in
addition to looking at growth which occurs outside out city but impacts our city; and mentioned that we
will look at those parcels and boundaries as we all move deeper into the process next year. Mr. Kuhta
added that a plan should be devised within another few months.
Mayor Wilhite called for a. recess 7:10 p.m., and reconvened the meeting at 7:24 p.m.
5. Street MasterPlan Update - Neil Kersten
Public Works Director Kersten explained that Council previously expressed their desire to have a well-
defined Street MasterPlan along with finding options, that identifies the current condition of the City
streets and also recommends appropriate improvements and maintenance that would preserve the value
and structural integrity of the local transportation system; and that J-U-B Engineers was selected as the
most qualified consultant for this project. Mr. Kersten then introduced J-U-B representatives David
Kliever, Area Manager for the Spokane Office; Chuck Larson, Corporate Tnuisportation Manager; and
Spencer Montgomery, Transportation Planner. The gentlemen from J-U-B went through two PowerPoint
presentations explaining various aspects of the Pavement Management Program, including its purpose,
program benefits, software requirements, pavement management program components, pavement
condition (including the Pavement Condition Map of 2006), budget scenarios and results, and the next
steps utcluding evaluating different construction techniques, evaluating maintenance/capital improvement
costs, drafting an annual maintenance and capital budget, and the draft six-year plan. The second
PowerPoint, Phase 2 Transportation Planning, also highlighted the purpose of the planning and the
Nleeting Minutes: 12-14-06 Page 2 of 4
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
primary and secondary data needs, followed by a flow-chart showing the entire Transportation
Improvement Program Preparation Process.
Mr. Mercier stated in reference to the map showing the graphical rendition of the current condition of our
pavements, that this map would point out the need to have another map developed which would suggest
what the condition statement would be at the end of the sewering program since sewering is not included
on the map, and to also look at the chart on the deterioration curve and to give us a post-severing glimpse
that way, as that may not have been one of the variables cross tabulated previously. J-U-B representatives
responded that one of the positive attributes of the program is that staff' can give them all the "what-ifs"
and they will tell us what they will do; and he mentioned that they arc on top of the sewering issue and
that will be one of the evaluation components on how they move forward with a five-year pavement
maintenance plan, showing what roadways will get done as part of that. Councilmember DeVleming
added that he would like to have this system include a function that would allow citizens to enter their
address on the system and see exactly what their street's condition is and the planned maintenance for the
street; or any connecting street:. J-U-B representative said this software would be able to include that
option; and to be effective, this system would need to be managed annually, and that each year we would
re-inventory about one-fifth of the roadways and re-run the five-year plan; so that every five years we will
have inventoried and inspected every roadway and kept that data updated. Mr. Mercier asked if any other
jurisdiction of significant size in our area has anything equivalent to this program; and the response was
no; although there are some on the vest side such as in Bellevue, Auburn, Kitsap County; and for a
community our size, J-U-B representative said he doesn't know how anyone could effectively manage a
roadway system without such a program. J-U-B representative added that currently more than 55% of our
roads are in "very good" condition, adding that their schedule for completion of the plan is within the next
four to sic months.
0 in reference to the Pavement Management Program "Scenario Results" showing the $1.5 budget and the
budget baseline of 72.6, Mr. Mercier said a scenario he would like to see would be what is the amount of
increased spending or investment required to maintain that current baseline at 72.6; and to therefore have
at least one scenario that doesn't show the bar below the baseline. Mr. Kersten stated that these budget
Figures arc very preliminary and the scenarios do not include the severing projects. Mr. Mercier added
that his comment was intended not to focus on the $1.5 but to understand that the trend line would require
an increasing amount each year to maintain the same level of condition.
Mr. Mercier mentioned that should J-U-B consultants come back and state that the recommended baseline
should be 79 or 82, or whatever figure, we would need to have information about the cost of the delta
between that and the 72.6 as well as the value ratio; so that if the baseline is stepped up, not only will that
increase cost "x" but will likely sieve cost "y."
Mr. Montgomery explained that the Phase 2 program, which has an ultimate goal to help staff prepare the
annual Transportation Improvement Program with better tools, and to therefore make better city
infrastructure. Mr. Mercier asked that if in Mr. Montgomery's experience for a community of our size
with the configuration of our transportation system, do you typically run this analysis solely on
intersection level of service or do you perform a corridor analysis as well? Mr. Montgomery responded
that typically one would start at the uitersection then begin to see corridor projects that can be identified.
Mr. Larson added that a lot of the level of service analysis done here was done by our staff with the
synro-model in a corridor setting where practical. Mr. Larson added that prior to the open house for the
public, likely to be held in March or April, that they will attempt to have the maps placed on our website
for public viewing.
Meeting Minutes: 12-19-06 Nge 3 of 4
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
6. Advance Agenda Additions - Mayor Wilhite
Mayor Wilhite asked if there were changes to the Advance Agenda, and mentioned the Tentative 2007
Calendar, adding that this year at a glance will give Councilmembers dates to consider when planning
time away from City Hall, and that the 2007 calendar also lists the 2007 AWC and rLC conferences.
7. In orniation Only: Fiber Internet Service for Centerl'lace: Information only, no discussion or report.
8. Council Check-in - Mayor Wilhite
Mayor Wilhite mentioned a tentative date of January 18 for a Conversation with the Community, but said
she hesitates to firmly schedule such as attendance has been very low in the past; but that last week a
constituent approached her about issues of interest in the Ponderosa area. Taking into consideration
Deputy Mayor Taylor's Thursday class schedule, she will work with councilmembers for a mutually
agreeable date. Councilmembers also mentioned the upcoming legislative conference in Olympia and the
desire to coordinate travel arrangements. Mayor Wilhite mentioned the opening on the Cable Advisory
Board with a December 29 application deadline, and she stated that any assistance in applicant
recommendations would be appreciated.
9. Ci Manager Comments - Dave Mercier
Regarding the vacant City Police Chief position, City Manager Mercier reported and he and Deputy City
Manager Regor attended a series of meetings with the Sheriff's Office in an effort to negotiate
enhancements in the selection process and clarify understandings of rights, roles and responsibilities; that
a series of proposals were made to the Sheriff's Office to alter the recruitment process, including the
possibility of broad based advertising so to be appraised of all interested candidates, or to include the
position as a City Employee; but that those alternates were not embraced by the Sheriff's Office; and that
a letter was received from the Sheriff's Office containing three names for Police Chief consideration, but
an initial review suggests there may be a need to have one or two replacement. names; as Mr. Mercier
mentioned he contacted two of those on the list and one is going to retire at the end of February and is
therefore no longer a candidate; and that another candidate apparently did not meet all the academic
attributes provided in the draft job description. Mr. Mercier said that the Sheriff is out of the area until
after the first of the year, but was informed by the Under Sheriff that the Sheriff's Office will recompose a
list of names for Police Chief Consideration. Mr. Mercier further explained that questions have arisen
concerning who has authority to remove the chief of police; that the current provisions of the RCWs list
the City Manager with appointment and removal authority; so there is a need for our attorneys to meet
with the Board of County Commissioner's attorneys to discuss several phrases in the contract and any
other contract issues such as one sheriff binding another sheriff to ongoing contracts. Mr. Mercier said
attempts are ongoing to get everyone in a meeting to discuss unresolved issues; and that Mr. Mercier
looks to have those issues clarified and to secure a list of names of several interested candidates.
Council/staff discussion included autonomy of the City in securing a candidate to fill t: he position;
selection, retention and removal issues; and that contracts are generally entered into when beneficial to all
parties.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m.
ATTES` :
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
Diana Wilhite, Mayor
Meeting Minutes: 12-19-06 Page 4 of 4
Approved by Council:
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: January 9, 2007. City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business 0 new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ® pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First Reading Ordinance 07-001 Extending URA Zone
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35A.63.220, Spokane Valley Ordinance 05-025
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Ordinance No. 06-019 extending the Interim Zoning
for an additional six months to coincide with the
adoption of Spokane Valley Development
Regulations.
BACKGROUND: An interim zoning ordinance may be renewed for one or more six-month
periods if a public hearing is held and findings of fact are made prior to each renewal. The
purpose of interim zoning is to maintain a status quo. The UR-1 interim zoning does not impose
a moratorium on construction, but does restrict further subdivision of land within the Ponderosa
~I and Rotchford neighborhoods.
The Interim UR-1 Urban Residential Estate Zoning was originally effective on September 8,
2004. A third renewal of six months was authorized until March 6, 2007. The updated work
plan had anticipated completion of development regulations, design guidelines and performance
standards implementing the Spokane Valley 2006-2026 Comprehensive Plan prior to this date.
The completion of development regulations is not expected to be complete until March 31,
2007, with actual rezoning with notice to affected property owners within six months thereafter.
It is anticipated that the development regulations will provide for an "R-1 - Residential Estate
Zoning District", with the same or similar provisions as those of the interim UR-1 district.
The City has received a single objection to continuance of the interim zoning regulation. The
objection centered on the minimum 40,000 square foot requirement for new lots.
OPTIONS: Approve the extension following a public hearing, deny the extension.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: "I move to advance ordinance 07-001
authorizing the fourth extension of the Interim UR-1 Residential Estate zoning in the
Ponderosa and Rotchford neighborhoods, to a second reading."
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Not applicable.
STAFF CONTACT: Marina Sukup, Community Development Director
ATTACHMENTS:
i Draft ordinance, Findings of Fact, Amended Workplan
DRAFT
C
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 07-001
AN ORDINANCE OF TAE CITY OF SPOKAN- VALLEY, WASHINGTON,
EXTENDII14G THE URBAN RESIDENTIAL ESTATE (UR-1) INTERIM ZONING
AUTHORIZED BY ORDINANCE No. 04-035 FOR AN ADDITIONAL. SIX MONTUS
BEYOND THE THIRD EXTENSION APPROVED BY ORDINANCE No. 06-01.9 IN
THE PONDEROSA AND ROTCHFORD AREAS; AND AIMENDiNG THE FINDINGS
OF FACT AND WORKPLAN.
0
WHEREAS, The Growth Management Act provides that all zoning regulations be consistent with an
adopted Comprehensive Plan (RCW 35A.63.105); and
RrhIEREAS, RCW 35A.63.220 provides for establishment of interim zoning for up to one year following
a public hearing where a Work plan is developed for related studies; and
WHEREAS, the interim zoning may be extended for one or more six-month periods if a subsequent
public hearing is held and findings of fact are made prior to each renewal; and
NVHEREAS, the Spokane Valley Development Regulations will be finalized on or before March 31,
2007; and
WHEREAS, the neighborhoods desire to continue the Interim Zoning until such time as full analysis has
been completed; and
WI-IEREAS, following a public hearing and the adoption of Findings and a revised Workpla n, Ordinance
No. 06-001 extended the interim zoning for a period of six months until September 6, 2006, and
Ordinance No. 06-019 further extended the provisions until March 6, 2007; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on January 9, 2007 and approved revised the Findings
of Fact and Workplan.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Washington, ordains as follows:
Section I. The Interim Urban Residential Estate (UR-1) Zoning is hereby extended for an additional
six month period until September 6, 2007 within the original boundaries and subject to the regulations set
forth in Spokane Valley Ordinance No. 04-035.
Section 2.. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance shall be held to be
invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall
not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this
ordinance.
Section 4. Effective [date This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of
this Ordinance or a summary thereof occurs in the official newspaper of the City as provided by law.
Ordinance 07-001 Ext UR-I Page 1 oft
DRAFT
PASSED by the City Council this day of January, 2007.
Mayor, Diana Wilhite
ATTEST:
City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge
Approved as to Form:
Office of the City Attorney
Date of Publication:
f?ffective Date: -
Ordinance 07-001 Lxt UR-1. Page 2 of 2
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
(711
ne FINDINGS OF FACT
REVISED JANUARY 1, 2007
16&Y FOURTH EXTENSION OF INTERIM URBAN RESIDENTIAL ESTATE
(UR-1) ZONING FOR SIX MONTHS
STAFF REPORT DATE: January 1, 2007
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: Extension of interim zoning controls to limit residential densities
for a period of six months, and to continue practice of allowing the keeping of large animals
on residential lots.
PROPOSAL LOCATION: Portions of the Ponderosa and Rotchford residential subdivisions.
PREPARED BY: Marina Sukup, AICP, Director, Spokane Valley Community Development
Dept.
1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
PROPERTY INFORMATION:
Size & Ponderosa: Located adjacent to Browne's Mountain on the southern edge of
Characteristics: the City, neighboring the Dishman Natural Area on the northwest and the Iller
Conservation area on the south. Fully developed single-family residential lots
generally exceeding one acre in size, served by local access and residential
collectors. Limited access to municipal wastewater collection system. Terrain
hilly with intermittent streams feeding Chester Creek. Portion of the
subdivision located within the 100-year floodplain. Large stands of native
Ponderosa pines. Abuts a closed landfill. Platted in phases between 1964
and 1992.
Rotchford: Located on the eastern edge of the City. Fully developed single-
family residential lots generally exceeding one acre in size, served by local
access and residential collectors. No access to municipal wastewater
collection system. Rolling terrain abutting steep hills with drainage into
Saltese Creek. Saltese Creek is located within the 100-year floodplain.
Platted in 1974.
Both subdivisions were originally platted as residential subdivisions designed
for the keeping of a limited number of horses.
SURROUNDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & ZONING
Subject Comprehensive Plan - Low Density Residential
Properties
Zoning - Interim UR-1 Residential Estate
UR•1 Interim Zoning
FINDINGS RevWed
January 1, 2007
1 of 7
11. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
The Spokane Valley 2006-2026 Comprehensive Plan provides the following guidance in
relevant part:
CHAPTER 2 LAND USE:
Residential Goals & Policies
Goal
LUG-1 Preserve and protect the character of Spokane Valley's residential
neighborhoods.
Policies
LUP-1.1 Maintain and protect the character of existing and future residential
neighborhoods through the development and enforcement of the City's
land use regulations and joint planning.
LUP-1.2 Protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent non-residential uses
and/or higher intensity uses through the development and enforcement of
the City's land use regulations and joint planning.
LUP-1.3 Review and revise as necessary, existing land use regulations to provide
for innovation and flexibility in the design of new residential
developments, accessory dwelling units and in-fill development.
LUP-1.4 Encourage the development of transportation routes and facilities to
serve residential neighborhoods. Special attention should be given to
pedestrian circulation.
LUP-1.5 Encourage the development of parks and the dedication of open space in
and adjacent to residential areas. Open space dedication shall be
proportionate to the size of the development.
LUP-1.6 Preserve site characteristics that enhance residential development (trees,
bodies of water, vistas, and similar features) using site planning
techniques such as clustering, planned unit developments, transfer of
development rights and lot size averaging.
LUP-1.7 Allow zone changes within the Low Density Residential category only
when specific criteria are met. Criteria may include:
• Substantial changes within zone change area.
• Clear mapping errors.
• Adequate facilities and services (e.g. sewer, water capacity)
• Consistency with densities in the vicinity of the zone change
UR-1 Interim Zoning
FINDINGS Revised
January 1. 2007
2of7
CHAPTER 10 NEIGHBORHOODS:
Goal
NG-2 Preserve and protect the character of Spokane Valley's residential
neighborhoods.
Policies
NP-2.1 Maintain and protect the character of existing and future residential
neighborhoods through the development and enforcement of the City's
land use regulations and joint planning.
NP-22 Review and revise as necessary, existing land use regulations to provide
for innovation and flexibility in the design of new residential
developments, accessory dwelling units, and in-fill development.
NP-2.3 Encourage the development of parks and the dedication of open space in
and adjacent to residential areas. Open space dedication shall be
proportionate to the size of the development.
NP-2.4 Preserve site characteristics that enhance residential development (trees,
bodies of water, vistas, and similar features) using site planning
techniques such as clustering, planned unit developments, transfer of
development rights, and lot size averaging.
NP-2.5 Allow zone changes within the Low Density Residential category only
when specific criteria are met. Criteria may include:
• Substantial changes within zone change area.
• Clear mapping errors.
• Adequate facilities and services (e.g. sewer, water capacity).
• Consistency with densities in the vicinity of the zone change.
NP-2.6 Establish appropriate design guidelines with buffer zones and transition
requirements to protect residential neighborhoods from incompatible land
uses and adverse impacts associated with arterials, freeways and rail
corridors.
NP-2.7 Encourage rehabilitation and improvement programs to conserve and
upgrade existing properties and buildings.
NP-2.8 Encourage programs targeted at neighborhood preservation, including
Weed and Seed, housing rehabilitation and crime prevention programs,
such as Neighborhood Watch, McGruff Houses, etc.
NP-2.9 Integrate retail developments into surrounding neighborhoods through
attention to quality design and function. Encourage neighborhood retail
and personal services to locate at appropriate sites where local economic
demand and design solutions demonstrate compatibility with the
neighborhood.
NP-2.10 Develop guidelines and options for Neighborhood/sub-area associations
which facilitate the refinement of Neighborhood/sub-area plans.
UR-1 Interim Zoning
FINDINGS Revised
January 1, 2007
3of7
NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER:
Ponderosa: Low density residential designed for on-premises maintenance of a limited
number of horses. Heavily wooded with rugged terrain in parts. Expansion to the northwest
precluded because of the Dishman Natural Area and terrain. Over 95% of lots fully
developed. Some remain vacant because of topography.
Rotchford: Low density residential designed for on-premises maintenance of a limited
number of horses. Terrain is relatively flat east of Sullivan Road with steep hillside limiting
any easterly expansion. Equine easements provided on local streets. Subdivision is fully
developed.
Social Character: Well-organized and cohesive neighborhoods.
DESIGN QUALITY: Local access and residential collectors designed to accommodate lots
of approximately one acre. Single-family housing is well-maintained and designed for
residential privacy. A limited number of large animals, especially horses is a design theme
in both neighborhoods.
Although the Spokane Valley 2006-2026 Comprehensive Plan has been adopted,
Spokane Valley has not finalized implementing regulations, performance or design
standards to assure the quality of residential design to preserve neighborhood
character pursuant to the Plan.
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY:
Wastewater. Limited access to public sewer in the Ponderosa. Balance of property relies
on septic systems. Rotchford Acres relies entirely on septic systems. Re-subdivision to
increase residential densities should not be permitted absent an organized wastewater
collection and treatment system.
Potable Water. Ponderosa is served by Spokane County Water District #3, Rotchford by
Vera Irrigation Dist. #15, both Group "A° Community Water Systems. Re-subdivision to
increase residential densities will require adequate supply and pressure for domestic
consumption and fire protection.
Stormwater the Ponderosa subdivision has intermittent streams that drain to Chester
Creek. The contribution of to the rate and volume of flows from additional impervious cover
resulting from re-subdivision could result in an environmental damage as yet undetermined
for which mitigation would need to be established in a planned and coordinated manner.
Similar concerns concerning drainage which could affect Saltese Creek. A significant
stream traversing the neighborhood has been reclassified as a Type 4 stream by the
Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife. The implications of this
change have not been assessed. The Federal Emergency Management Agency proposes
to release draft floodplain maps affecting Saltese Creek is mid-2008.
Erodible soils: Both the Rotchford and Ponderosa subdivisions include or abut geological
hazard areas which require further evaluation prior to allowing additional residential
densities.
Native Vegetation/habitat: Ponderosa includes areas of wildlife critical habitat for White Tail
Deer and threatened species.
Spokane Valley has not yet finalized implementing regulations, performance or
design standards to assure the continued preservation of environmental quality in
outlying areas with limited public infrastructure and specific environmental
conditions, such as steep slopes, intermittent flooding and highly erodible soils.
UR 1 Interim Zoning
FINDINGS Revised
January 1, 2007
4of7
PUBLIC HEALTH & SAFETY:
Access: Ponderosa: Property lies west of the Union Pacific Railroad with only two points of
access. Additional access should be required prior to any increase in residential densities
for evacuation and emergency services. The evaluation of access will be incorporated in
the Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan under development by the City of Spokane Valley in the
Fall and Winter of 2005-2006.
Animal Maintenance: The requirements for the maintenance and upkeep of even a limited
number of large animals raises issues of compatibility resulting from noise, odor, proximity
to residential structures, flies, etc.. These issues are compounded with increased
residential densities and requirements for buffering for any additional residential densities
may be required.
Landfill: Ponderosa: The proximity of a closed landfill to an increased number of
residences requires additional study.
Although the Spokane Valley 2006-2026 Comprehensive Plan has been adopted,
Spokane Valley has not yet finalized implementing regulations, performance or
design standards to assure the quality of residential design to preserve
neighborhood character pursuant to the Plan.
PUBLIC NOTICE:
Current property owners purchased property with notice of existing regulations pertaining to
the keeping of large animals. The Short Plat process requires notice only to adjacent
property owners.
COMPLIANCE WITH THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL. POLICY ACT (SEPAL: Ordinance No. 48
(effective March 31, 2003) adopted on an interim basis by reference the Spokane
Environmental Ordinance (Spokane County) thereby implementing the State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and Chapter 197-11 of the Washington Administrative
Code (WAC) within the jurisdictional limits of the City of Spokane Valley. An
Environmental checklist was completed and a Determination of Non-Significance was
issued on April 26, 2004. Conclusions were based on the finding that a regulation
preserving the status quo would have no adverse environmental impact.
Concluslon(s):
Implementing regulations, performance and design standards implementing the
Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan will be finalized on or about March 31, 2007.
Rezoning with notice to affected property owners is required prior to institution of
permanent regulations.
III. DECISION
The Interim UR-1 Residential Estate Zoning adopted pursuant to Spokane Valley
Ordinance 04-035 and extended by Ordinance No. 06-001 until September 6, 2006,
and until March 6, 2007, should be extended for a fourth six month period until
September 6, 2007 pending finalization of development regulations, performance and
design standards, in order to preserve neighborhood character, maintain
environmental quality, and to ensure the continued health, safety and welfare of the
areas in accordance with the revised Workplan attached as Exhibit"C".
UR-1 Interim Zoning
FINDINGS Revised
January 1, 2007
5 ot7
UR-1 Interim Zoning
FINDINGS Revised
January 1, 2007
6of7
Enhlblt 'C"
REVISED UR•1 Interim Zoning {Mork Plan
January 1. 2007
ofa
ma
n.ir
wv
.e or
a:v
rt7
Taa ft"
Sal
Firvan
~k7n
w
wr
r
a.
ur
w
o.
o..
a.
A"
.r
M
t
MaipbboelwoA CbaracaM
LNZOOe
irtr200a
~ Y.
2
Ca~ahMOA Plan
~
MOM
5/1 2004
R 2w
2
D w0.2 fr
30!4M
wzMT
52w
4
EnVbW n. I O"We
Mm
) WMT
feaw
5
Samw Creak Re-Um
Srtr400e
4ly200)
wow
a
Pubae H"WS-"
Ile im
&MOM
:4w
)
i umm mmoom Aam
all z=
S?2fd006
taw
e
P Aft NWM
er9r2006
6r1 VM?
U-&*
9
Rsgufatm Ravi"
YI?*m
Y7t0/7007
saw
10
327!49100
]lmrZ00)
SS+r
11
Rem ov Goandwn
uWWT
)r2t*Wl
11w
UR•1 Interim Zoning
FINDINGS Revised
January 1, 2007
7 o17
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: January 9, 2007 City Manager Sign-off-
Item: Cbeek all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First Reading Proposed Ordinance 07-002, proposed right-of-way vacation
request (S7V-04-06) for a portion of 15th Avenue.
BACKGROUND:
The applicant's representative Alan Gay. USKII on behalf of the owners South Terrace Spokane and
Sundevil Development requests the vacation of a portion of right-of-way along 15°i Avenue located
approximately 47, feet west of Carnahan Road in the vicinity of 15* Avenue cul-de-sac and a portion 23
feet east of 15°' Avenue cul-dc-sac adjacent to Carnahan Road. The half of cul-do-sac equals 3,505 square
feet located between Parcel Nos. 35233.1515 & 35233.1516 (north) and 35233.2802 & 35233.2805 (south)
and the portion adjacent to Carnahan is 20 feet wide by 60 feet deep located between Parcel Nos.
35233.1517 (north) and 35233.2804 (south).
The Planning Commission made the following findings as part of their recommendation to City Council:
1. Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 14, 2006. The date of the hearing
was set by City Council on October 24, 2006 by Spokane Valley Resolution No. 06-020.
Notice of the hearing was published on November 17, 20006 in the Valley Herald, the official
newspaper of the City, was posted in three conspicuous locations within the City, was
PREVIOUS COUNCILCOMMISS[ON ACTION TAKEN: City Council adopted Resolution No. 06-
020 on October 24, 2006, setting the date for a public hearing hold on December 14, 2006. The Planning
Commission voted 6-0 to approve the attached findings and to recommend conditional approval of the
vacation. No new public comment shall be accepted since the public hearing has been closed.
provided to the petitioners and abutting property owners, and a sign was placed on the
property providing notice of the hearing also completed on November 17, 2006
2. The Planning Commission reviewed the report prepared by the Spokane Valley Community
Development Department in detail.
3. The vacation of the street/alley will permit full development of the property for beneficial uses
and permit appropriate levels of maintenance.
4. The Public Works Department submitted comments which analyzed the portions of 15'd
Avenue for need and future use and responded by specifying the requested portions are no
longer required for public use or public access subject to recommended conditions.
5. Given the present age and condition of adjacent development, it is unlikely that conditions will
change in the future to provide a greater use or need than presently exists; and
6. No objections have been received to the proposed vacation from the notice of public hearing
and/or routing to staff and agencies.
OPTIONS:
1. Move to 2°d reading scheduled at next City Council Meeting for approvallapproval with
conditions (No new public comment shall be accepted since the public hearing has been closed.);
2. Deny the proposed street vacation; or
3. Schedule a public hearing that will be conducted 20 days after noticing in the mail, on-site and
posted three conspicuous places in the City.
RECOMMENDED mono.N: Stove to Advance Ordinance 07-002 to a second reading.
STAFF CONTACT: Karen Kendall, Assistant Planner
ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report
Planning Commission Findings
Draft Ordinance
Spou5ne
Walley STAFF :PORT
PROPOSED VACATION OF A PORTIONS OF 1.5n AVENUE
Prepared by: Karen Kendall, Assistant Planner, Department of Community Development
Date: December 6, 2006
Findings:
1. Abutting Properties - The right-of-way proposed for vacation is located approximately 43 feet
west of Carnahan Road in the vicinity of 15`h Avenue cul-de-sac and a portion 23 feet east of 15
Avenue cul-de-sac adjacent to Carnahan Road. The half of cul-de-sac equals 3,505 square feet
located between Parcel Nos. 35233.1515 & 35233.1516 (north) and 35233.2802 & 35233.2805
(south) and the portion adjacent to Carnahan is 20 feet wide by 60 feet deep located between
Parcel Nos. 35233.1517 (north) and 352312804 (south). The portion of 15`h Avenue proposed to
be vacated is bordered on the north by South Terrace Spokane who's requesting the proposed
action and the south by SLuidevil Development. No objection from abutting property owners was
received.
2. Utilities - Comments were received from City of Spokane Water and Sewer, Qwcst and Avista
Utilities. Avista commented on the need to require preservation of easements for their scNices
located in the portions of 15'x' Avenue proposed for vacation.
3. Access - A portion of right-of-way (20 feet by 60 feet) located between the hvo (2) requested
areas was vacated previously by County Resolution No. 96-0379. Additionally in 2004 several
lots were being erected from the original Woodland Terrace Plat. ISO' Avenue was required to be
designed and constructed for access to the lots. The cul-de-sac on 15`h Avenue was constructed
west of the existing public right-of-way due to the steep slopes and rocky terrain. The cul-de-sac
is built and the three lots abutting the proposed street vacation would access directly onto 15`''
Avenue.
4. Zoning - Zoning surrounding the proposed vacation to the north, south, east and west is Urban
Residential 3.5 (UR.-3.5). The six parcels which abut the proposed street vacation are in the City's
Comprehensive Plan Designation as Low Density Residential as well as all surrounding properties.
5. Transportation - There is no access directly to Carnahan Street located to the east of the subject
area due to a vacation by County Resolution No. 96-0379 and the steep slopes with rocky terrain.
6. Condition - The proposed areas to be vacated have not been improved or currently usable for
access. The size, access and condition of the property preclude use by the City.
7. Assignment of Vacated portions of right-of-way - Absent objections from abutting properties
owners, right-of-way should be assigned to the petitioners, inasmuch as it appears that any portion
of the right-of-way to which they would lay claim will be transferred to them through completion
and a positive approval of the vacation. Abutting property owners have received notice of the
proposed vacation.
Conclusions:
I . The vacation of the street/alley will pennit full development of the property for beneficial uses and
permit appropriate levels of maintenance.
2. The Public Works Department submitted comments which analyzed the.portions of 15th Avenue
for need and future use and responded by specifying the requested portions are no longer required
,i for public use or public access subject to recommended conditions.
3. Given the present age and condition of adjacent development, it is unlikely that conditions will
change in the future to provide a greater use or need than presently exists; and
4. No objections have been received to the proposed vacation from the notice of public hearing
and/or routing to staff and agencies.
DRAFT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 07-002
AN ORDINANCE OF TAE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON, PROVIDING FOR
THE VACATION OF THE PORTIONS OF 15'H AVENUE BET`VEEN PARCEL NUMBERS
35233.1515, 35233.1516 AND 35233.1517 TO THE NORTH. AND PARCEL NUMBERS
35233.2802, 35233.2804 AND 35233.2805 TO THE SOUTH; AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER
MATTERS PROPERLY RELATING THERETO.
WHEREAS, the City Council by Resolution 06-020 initiated vacation proceedings for a portion
of 1516 Avenue located approximately 43 feet west of Carnahan Road in the vicinity of 15"' Avenue cul-
de-sac and a portion 23 feet east of 15`h Avenue cul-de-sac adjacent to Carnahan Road. The half of cul-
de-sac equals 3,505 square feet located between Parcel \'os. 35233.1515 & 35233.1516 (north) and
35233.2802 & 35233.2805 (south) and the portion adjacent to Carnahan is 20 feet wide by 60 feet deep
located between Parcel 'Nos. 35233.1517 (north) and 35233.2804 (south) (STV-04-06) by providing that a
hearing on the proposal would be held before the Planning Commission on the 14th day of December,
2006; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 14, 2006; and
WHFRrAS, following a hearing, the Planning Commission found that the notice and hearing
requirements of Title 10 Article TX Section 10.09.04.10 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code have been
1 met, and further found that:
1. The vacation of the street/alley will permit full development of the property for beneficial uses and
permit appropriate levels of maintenance.
2. The Public Works Department submitted comments which analyzed the portions of 15th Avenue for
need and future use and responded by specifying the requested portions are no longer required for public
use or public access subject to recommended conditions.
3. Given the present age and condition of adjacent development, it is unlikely that conditions will change
in the future to provide a greater use or need than presently exists; mid
4. No objections have been received to the proposed vacation from the notice of public hearing and/or
routing to staff and agencies.
\VFfEREAS, the Planning Commission findings and/or minutes have been filed with the City
Clerk as part of the public record supporting the vacation; and
\VI-1EREAS, none of the property owners abutting the property to be vacated filed a written
objection to the proposed vacation with the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, through adopted City Code provisions, the City shall provide that the vacated
property be transferred to the abutting property owners, one-half to each, unless circumstances require a
different division of property; that the zoning district designation of the properties adjoining each side of
the street shall attach to the vacated property; that a record of survey shall be submitted to the Director of
Community Development; and that all direct and indirect costs of title transfer to the vacated street be
paid by the proponent or recipient of the transferred property; and
Ordinance 07-002 Street Vacation STV-04-06 Page 1 of 4
DRAFT
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to vacate the above street pursuant to Spokane Valley
Municipal Code Sections 10.05.220 - .380.
NOW, THEKEFORI, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County,
Washington, do ordain as follows:
Section 1. Findin a of Fact. The City Council makes the following findings of fact: (1) the
City Department of Public Works has reviewed the right-of-"gay to be vacated and determined that the
property adjacent to the vacated property is otherwise served by public or private access; (2) a public
hearing on the proposed vacation has been held in accordance with State Law and City Code before the
Planning Commission with the record of such hearing and proceedings filed with the City Clerk; (3) no
written comments were received by an abutting properties.
Section 2. Propertto be Vacated. Based upon the above findings and in accordance with
this Ordinance, the City Council does hereby vacate the street or alley described on the attached Exhibit
"A" which is incorporated herein by reference.
Section 3. Zoning. The Zoning designation for the vacated property shall be the designation
attached to the adjoining properties as set forth within the respective property or lot lines. The Director of
Community Development is authorized to make this notation on the official Zoning Map of the City.
Section 4. Conditions of Vacation. The following conditions shall be fully satisfied prior to
the transfer of title by the City.
a) A record of survey prepared by a registered surveyor in the State of Washington and including an
exact metes and bounds legal description and specifying if applicable any and all casements for
construction, repair and maintenance of existing and future utilities and services. The record of survey
shall contain the professional stamp and signature of the registered surveyor and should be filed upon
completion with the Spokane County Auditor. The surveyor shall provide the City of Spokane Valley
with a nrylar copy of the recorded survey and the Auditor's Document Number and date of recordation;
and
b) The surveyor shall locate at least two monuments on the centerline of the vacated right-of-way with
one located at the intersection of the centerline of the vacated right-of-way with each street or right-of-
way in accordance with the standards established by the Sl)okane County Standards for Road and Server
Construction; and
c) All necessary easements required by Avista shall be shown on the record of survey and written
documentation from all utility companies is required to be submitted to the Community Development
Director, or designee verifying all easements have been indicated; and
d) Payment of all direct and indirect costs of title transfer of the vacated street or alley from public to
private ownership including but not limited to title company charges, copying fees, and recording fees;
and
e) The applicable zoning district designation (Urban Residential-3.5) shall be automatically extended to
the center of such vacation, and all area included in the vacation shall then and henceforth be subject to all
regulations of the extended districts.
Section 5. Closing. Following satisfaction of the above conditions, the City Clerk shall
record a certified copy of this Ordinance in the office of the County Auditor, and the City Manager is
Ordinance 07-002 Street Vacation STV-04-06 Page 2 of 4
DRAFT
authorized to execute all necessary documents, including a Quit Claim Deed, in order to complete the
transfer of the property identified herein.
Section 6. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be
held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or
phrase of this ordinance.
Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after
publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane
Valley as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council this day of 2007.
Mayor, Diana Wilhite
ATTEST:
City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge
Approved As To Form:
Office of the City Attorney
Date of Publication:
Effective Date: -
Page 3 of
Ordinance 07-002 Street Vacation S'rV-04-06 4
DRAFT
Exhibit "A"
Proacrty Description
01MICATIE0 ARE
PCB )%,EtJ •5U898..
,ry
1.5th Avenue
DEDICATED AiEA
PER AFA .536 ENS
YAC EO, G.C.
1_= c 20.43` I
cK=•50.04°
~ ! C
3,503 ;5;.F-
AREA TO f-.E
arnahan
Road
Ordinance 07-002 Street Vacation STV-04-06 Page 4 of 4 l
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION
C) December 14, 2006
Findings:
l . The Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 14, 2006 to receive testimony
concerning the vacation of a portion right-of-way along 1P Avenue located appro.Yimatcly 43 feet
west of Carnahan Road in the vicinity of 15'b Avenue cul-de-sac and a portion 23 feet east of 15`s
Avenue cul-de-sac adjacent to Carnahan Road. The half of cul-de-sac equals 3,505 square feet
located between Parcel Nos. '35233.15 l5 & 35233.1516 (north) and 35233.2802 & 35233.2805
(south) and the portion adjacent to Carnahan is 20 feet wide by 60 feet deep located between
Parcel Nos. 35233.1517 (north) and 35233.2804 (south). The date of the hearing was set by City
Council on October 24, 2006 by Spokane Valley Resolution No. 06-020. Notice of the hearing
was published on November 17, 20006 in the Valley Herald, the official newspaper of the City,
was posted in three conspicuous locations within the City, was provided to the petitioners and
abutting property owners, and a sign was placed on the property providing notice of the hearing
also completed on November 1.7, 2006.
2. The Planning Commission reviewed the report prepared by the Spokane Valley Community
Development Department in detail.
3. The vacation of the streettalley will permit full development of the property for beneficial uses and
permit appropriate levels of maintenance.
4. The Public Works Department submitted comments which analyzed the portions of 15`x' Avenue
for need and future use and responded by specifying the requested portions are no longer required
for public use or public access subject to recommended conditions.
5. Given the present age and condition of adjacent development, it is unlikely that conditions will
change in the future to provide a greater use or need than presently exists; and
6. No objections have been received to the proposed vacation from the notice of public hearing
and/or routing to staff and agencies.
Conclusions:
The Spokane Valley'Planning Commission therefore recommends to the City Council the portion of right-
of-way along 1 P Avenue located approximately 43 feet west of Carnahan Road in the vicinity of 15°i
Avenue cul-de-sac and a portion 23 feet east of 15`s Avenue cul-de-sac adjacent to Carnahan Road. The
half ofcul-de-sac equals 3,505 square feet located between Parcel Nos. 35233.1515 & 35233.1516 (north)
and 35233.2802 & 35233.2805 (south) and the portion adjacent to Carnahan is 20 feet wide by 60 Peet
deep located between Parcel Nos. 35233.1517 (north) and 35233.2804 (south) be vacated to the petitioners
subject to:
1. Following the City Council's passage of the ordinance approving the proposal to vacate the street
or alley, a record of survey of the area to be vacated, prepared by a registered surveyor in the State
of Washington and including an exact metes and bounds legal description, and specifying if
applicable any and all easements for construction, repair and maintenance of existing and future
utilities and services, shall be submitted by the proponent to the Director. The record of survey
shall contain the professional stamp and signature of the registered surveyor and filed upon
completion with the Spokane County Auditor. The surveyor shall provide the City of Spokane
Valley with a mylar copy of the recorded survey and the Auditor's Document Number Auld date of
recordation.
2. The surveyor shall locate at least two monuments on the centerline of the vacated right-of-way
with one located at the intersection of the centerline of the vacated right-of-way with each street or
I~ i
right-of-way in accordance with the standards established by the Spokane County Standardsfor
Road and Sewer Construction.
3. All necessary easements required by Avista shall be shown on the record of survey and written
documentation from all utility companies is required to be submitted to the Community
Development Director, or designee verifying all easements have been indicated.
4. All direct and indirect costs of title transfer of the vacated street or alley from public to private
ownership including but not limited to title company charges, copying fees, and recording fees are
to be borne by the proponent. The City will not assume any financial responsibility for any direct
or indirect costs for the transfer of title.
5. The zoning district designation of the properties adjoining each side of the street or alley to be
vacated shall be automatically extended to the center of such vacation, and all area shall included
in the vacation shall then and henceforth be subject to all regulations of the extended districts. The
adopting ordinance shall specify this zoning district extension inclusive of the applicable zoning
district designations.
6. A certified copy of the ordinance vacating a street or alley or part thereof shall be recorded by the
city clerk in the office of the Spokane County auditor:
7. All conditions of City Council authorization shall be fully satisfied prior to any transfer of title by
the City.
Approved this 14"' day of December, 2006
Gail Kogle, Chairman
ATUS`C
Deanna Griffith, Administrative Assistant
C-)
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: January 9, 2007
City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Fiber Internet Service for CenterPlace
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: NIA
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council previously declined to install fiber based on
high cost versus benefit.
BACKGROUND: The cost to provide fiber technology to CenterPlace for Internet service has
continued to drop. At this time, Time Warner is proposing to provide fiber at no installation cost
and a monthly recurring cost of $886. This results in a net increase of $201 for fiber versus
copper (including the $260 in savings which will result from the elimination of the two T1 lines
between City Hall and CenterPlace).
At the April 12, 2005 City Council meeting, staff discussed with Council an installation cost of
$48,000 and a monthly recurring cost of $2,300. So, the current proposal is much more
economical.
While it is impossible to predict with certainty, it appears that fiber cost has reached a low point
and is worth reconsidering. The additional capacity will allow the City (or third party providers) to
pursue video conferencing from CenterPlace. The fiber will also provide increased capacity for
future Internet based services.
OPTIONS:
1. Install Internet fiber at CenterPlace.
2. Continue using T1 lines for Internet services.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize installation of Internet Fiber at
CenterPlace.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: $2,412 increased cost in telephone services.
STAFF CONTACT: Mike Jackson, Parks & Recreation Director
ATTACHMENTS: December 27, 2006 Memorandum from Bing Bingaman; Information
Technology Specialist
To: Mike Jackson, Parks & Rec. Director
From: Bing, Information Technology Specialist
CC:
Date: December 27, 2006
Re: Fiber Internet Service for CenterPlace
Upgrade Internet Service for CenterPlace Proposal to support larger
conferences and video/telephone conferencing
Mike here's a brief overview:
o Originally Time Warner wanted $30,000 to install the fiber, and then $1,355 per
month for 10 MB fiber internet connection; they are now offering no install cost,
$886.00 per month for 6 MB connection.
o Currently we are paying Oneeighty networks at total of $425.00 per month for internet
service; $125.00 for the Private T1 Line and $300.00 for the internet service at 1.5 MB
o We are also paying 180.00 x2 for a total of $360.00 for two T1's between City Hall and
CenterPlace:
• 1 for phone transport
• 1 for data transport
c The costs of the two T1's for transport will be eliminated once we finish the fiber install
(before the end of the year). Our re-occurring cost will then be $100.00 per month (Fiber
agreement with Columbia, $20/mile) for a savings of $260.00 / month.
o So the difference we are talking about it is:
■ Currently, 1.5 MB internet service and 3 T1's = $785.00 / month
■ Proposed, 6 MB of internet service and fiber = $986.00 / month
• After all is said and done, net increase cost of $201 to go 4 times as fast which will allow us to start
working on video/teleconferencing.
1
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: January 2, 2007
City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: p consent ❑ Old business ❑ New business ❑ Public Hearing
x❑ Information a Admin. Report[] Pending Legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Request for Qualifications (RFQ): City Center Consulting Services
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council approved a contract for consulting services
to develop a subarea plan for the Sprague/Appleway corridor, including designating and
planning a city center. Preliminary recommendations concerning a proposed location for the
city center was presented to Council at a joint Planning CommissionlCity Council meeting on
September 14, 2006.
BACKGROUND: On September 14, 2006, at a Joint Planning Commission/City Council
meeting, the City's lead consultant for the Sprague/Appleway Corridor Revitalization Plan
presented to council three options to pursue the development of a city center:
1. Master plan the preferred site, adopt zoning regulations that would allow a city center to
be constructed, then wait for the market to build it.
2. Master plan and zone the preferred site and then "stimulate" developer interest by
constructing civic buildings and/or other capital improvements such as streets, sidewalks
and parks.
3. Master plan and zone the preferred site, secure property by purchase or option, market
the city center plan to developers through a competitive Request for Proposals (RFP)
process and then resell property to selected developer.
Option 1 provides the least financial risk to the City, but will likely take a significant amount of
time for a city center to develop, if it happens at all. Option 2 requires a significant financial
investment from the City for capital improvements, and therefore poses a greater financial risk,
but the chances of getting a city center constructed are better than Option 1. Option 3 gives the
City control over the project and potentially is the fastest way to get a city center constructed.
However, it is the riskiest option because it requires the City to play a much more active
development role. City Council expressed interested in exploring Option 3.
Michael Freedman suggested that the City would be best served by hiring a consultant to assist
in contacting and negotiating with property owners in the area preliminarily designated as city
center "Phase 1 To keep the city center project moving forward, staff has prepared the
attached draft RFQ for Council's review.
OPTIONS: 1) Move forward with the RFQ as proposed or amended; or 2) Provide additional
direction to staff.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Provide input to staff.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The cost of the consultant is preliminarily estimated at
$50,000. Funding for the Sprague-Appleway Revitalization Plan is included in the 2007 budget,
but did not include the cost of these proposed consulting services. If Council approves moving
forward with this proposal, the cost would be incorporated into the City's spring 2007 budget
amendment.
STAFF CONTACT: Scott Kuhta, Senior Planner
Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager
Attachments: Proposed RFQ
S pukan~~
jUalley
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Community Development Department
REQUEST FOR. QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ)
City Center Property Negotiations, Acquisition and Development
SUBMITTAL DEADLINE
February 2, 2007
SUBMIT
Original plus four (4) duplicate copies
DELIVER TO:
City of Spokane Valley
Community Development Department
Al-]'N: Scott Kuhta, Senior Planner
11707 E. Sprague Avenue, Suite 106
Spokane Valley, Washington 99206-5444
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
DESCRIPTION
PAC
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS ................................................................................................................................1
INTRODUCTION
.1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION .........................................................................................ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINE
D.
PROJF..CT SCHEDULE
. I
PROJECT ESTIMATE
.1
SCOPE OF SERVICES
.1
PERFORMANCE OF SERVICES
1
CONS ULY'ANI' SELECTION SCHEDULE
SELECTION PROCESS
INTER.VIEWS
I
ADDENDA
2
CONFIDENTIALITY
2
GENERAL CONDITIONS
2
INSURANCE
2
EVALUATION COMMITTEE
2
SUBMITTAL
2
FORMAT AND BINDING
3
PACKAGING
3
DELIVERY
3
FEDERAL EEO, ADA, CIVIL RIGHTS REQUIREMENTS
ATTACI•iMI ,NT A - PART I
i
.
ATTACHMENT A - PART 2 ..............................................................................................................................................5
ATTACHMENT B - EVALUATION CRITERIA AND WEIGHTS ...............................................................................G
ATTACHMENT C-MANDATORY `fE.IRMS AND CONDITIONS ..............................................................................7
ATTACHMENT D - INSURANCE REQUIRFMIENL'S
-II-
REQUEST FOR QUALITICATI:ONS
.cITR0QUCTI0N: The City of Spokane Valley is currently developing a revitalization plan for the Sprague/Appleway
corridor. A key part of the plan is to designate and develop a new City Center along the corridor. A preferred site has been
selected and the City is initiating discussions with current property owners concerning fbture development plans. The City
of Spokane Valley seeks assistance from a CONSULTANT with extensive real estate negotiation and development
experience in both public and private sector realms.
The CONSULTANT must have extensive experience in negotiating and executing complicated real estate purchase,
options, development and financing agreements, specifically relating to mixed-use/town center developments. The
CONSULTANT will also have extensive knowledge of retail, office and residential markets, including national trends in
real estate development and retail consumerism.
PROJECT SC14EDULF: Work under this contract shall begin on or about March 19, 2007 and is anticipated to be
completed by December 31, 2007.
PROJECT ESTIMATE: The anticipated cost range for this work is $20,000 to $50,000.
SCOPE OF SF.,RVICES: The selected CONSULTANT will serve as the City's key strategic advisor in all City Center
negotiations and deal structuring. The CONSULTANT will review the City's plans and progress towards developing a
City Center in the vicinity of University Avenue at Sprague and Appleway. The CONSULTANT will lead discussions and
assist in negotiations with key property owners within the preferred City Center location. The CONSULTANT will
negotiate terms of a development agreement between the City and property owners and/or developers to construct the City
Center.
(7)RhORMANCE OF SERVICES: The City intends that the firm awarded a contract will perform the work commencing
upon the notice to proceed and terminate upon project completion unless terminated sooner with written notification by the
City. The designation of a firm as "most highly qualified" by the City is not intended to be nor will it be a guarantee that
all professional services required by the City, appropriate to a firm of its type, will be exclusively performed by that firm.
The City retains the right to award work, on this or any other project, to other firms.
CONSULTANT SELECTION SCHEDULE: (T he follotiving dates are based upon initial platminrg and should be
considered teiyative).
1. Evaluate applications the week of February 5, 2007.
2. Interview finalists (if conducted) the week of February 26, 2007.
3. Designation of the most highly qualified firm week of March 5, 2007.
SELECTION PROCESS: A recommendation committee will rank all proper submittals based on the evaluation criteria set
forth in this packet... From these rankings either a recommendation for the most highly qualified firm will be made or a short
list of leading candidates will be developed for the purpose of interviews.
Spokane Valley reservers the right to select the most highly qualified firm based solely on the written response to the
evaluation criteria. interviews are not a mandatory part of this process. Spokane Valley will be the sole judge in the
determination of the most highly qualified firm.
1NTf R.ViEWS: Interviews will be held at the sole option of the City. If interviews are conducted firms should plan to have
key personnel on their interview teams who will be assigned to the work on the proposed project. Short listed firms may be
C ed to provide supplemental or additional information for review by the committee prior to the interviews.
The City reserves the right to utilize new or revised evaluation criteria and weights to be used in evaluation of the firms
January 15, 2007 City Center Property Negotiations Page 1 of 1 l
being interviewed. If changes are made to the criteria or weights they will be reduced to writing and be sent to the interview
candidates prior to the conduct of the interviews.
Committee members will use the applicable evaluation criteria and weights-to evaluate interview information. Previous
clients may be contacted as part of the evaluation process. The recommendation committee will rank the firms interviewed
and present their recommendation to the City Council for selection of the most highly qualified firm.
ADDENDA: All official clarifications or interpretations of the documents will be by written addenda issued by Spokane
Valley. Clarifications or answers to questions given by Spokane Valley during the submittal process will be considered
informal and unofficial. The City is not responsible for oral interpretations. Notification of any apparent discrepancies,
omissions, or doubt as to meaning found in this document should be submitted in writing to the person designated to
receive administrative questions.
Acknowledge receipt of addenda in Attachment A, Part 1 D. Failure to provide acknowledgment may result in the submittal
being rejected as not responsive.
CONF_ID_EN_TiA_LITY: Firms responding to this Request For Qualifications (RFQ) are hereby put on notice that Spokane
Valley will regard submittals as public records which will be available for public inspection and/or copying, subject to the
public disclosure requirements of RCW Chanter 42.17 after selection of a Finn is made regardless of any markings or
notices contained in the submittal documents. Therefore, if these terms are not acceptable, a Finn should not respond to this
RFQ.
GENERAL CONDITIONS: This RFQ does not commit Spokane Valley to award a contract or to pay any costs incurred in
preparing a submittal or to procure or contract for services or supplies. Spokane Valley reserves the right not to select any
firm(s) for the services based on this RFQ, to accept or reject any or all submittals, or to cancel, at its discretion, this RFQ
at any time.
Declaring a Finn as the most highly qualified to perform the work of this RFQ is not intended nor will it in any way be
construed or considered to be a contract or an exclusive guarantee to furnish professional services associated with this
project or any other work suitable to a firm of its type.
After declaration of the most highly qualified firm a statement of work and price for services will be negotiated between the
City and the firm. If an agreement cannot be reached with the selected firm negotiations will be terminated and the next
most qualified firm will be contacted for contract negotiations. No work will be undertaken without a mutually agreed upon
statement of work, fee, and contract signed by the parties.
Any contract awarded will be nonexclusive and if it be in the City's best interest it may award work to other firms. Any
contracts resulting from this RFQ will be between the City and the provider of services and may be canceled upon written
notification by the City.
INSURANCE: The CONSULTANT will be required to carry, for the duration of any contract resulting from this RFQ, the
insurance types and amounts as set forth in Attachment D - Insurance Requirements.
EVALUATION CON IITTEE: Typically evaluation committees try to review all presentations at one sitting in order to
facilitate continuity, which helps improve the consistency of the individual scoring. Due to the number of firms that usually
respond and a limited amount of time available for review it is strongly recommended that the response be concise and to
the point. The response should be structured in order to make it easy for the committee to evaluate the firm's professional
capabilities and experience.
SUBMITTAL: The submittal response consists of the following items which should be submitted in the following order
January 15, 2007 City Center Property Negotiations Page 2 of 11
Item 1: Cover letter (optional but not required).
Item 2: Attachment A - Part 1, General Information Sheet and receipt of addenda acknowledgment. To facilitate
identification of the submission please use this sheet, or reproduction, as the second sheet behind the cover sheet/cover
letter on the inside of all document copies.
Item 3: Attachment A - Part 2, Administrative Information.
Item 4: Attachment B - Response to the evaluation criteria in Attachment B. Use Attachment B as the presentation
outline. Respond to all items. The short statements following each item are offered as starting points only. Respondents are
to add additional information required to more fully develop their responses so that the response makes sense for this
project. Index your responses to each item if you do not use the format of Attachment B as your outline. Answer each item
fully, completely and concisely.
Submissions will become part of the official records for this request for professional qualifications and cannot be returned.
FORMAT AND BINDING: Submittals shall be limited to 30 double-sided sheets (8 %i" x 11 excluding covers and
dividers. Personnel resumes should be no longer than one page. Type size for text should be at least 10-points. Data
submitted should be bound in a single volume. Depending on thickness a staple in the upper left corner or plastic spiral, 19-
ring binding is preferred. Please do not submit materials bound in a three-ring type binder. The cover should be of a
suitable weight paper to protect the data. Bulk must be kept to an absolute minimum. Any material submitted for
consideration must be incorporated in each resnonse coov. A single set of material will not be reviewed.
PACKAGING: Submissions shall be scaled in an opaque envelope or package which has been clearly marked in the upper
' -ft corner with the Firm's name and address. In the center of the envelope or package write out "REQUEST FOR
IUALIFiCATiONS #05-002", followed by the submittal date of and title words "City Center Property
Negotiations."
DELIVERY: Submittals must be received on the day, date, time and location stipulated on the cover sheet. Submittals
delivered late may be rejected as non-responsive and be returned unopened.
FEDERAL, EEO. ADA, CIVI_L_ RIQHJS REOWREMENTS
The City of Spokane Valley in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 252, 42 U.S.C. 2000d to
2000dA and Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Department of Transportation, subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, Part
21, nondiscrimination in federally assisted programs of the Department of Transportation issued pursuant to such Act,
hereby notifies all interested parties that it will affirmatively insure that in any contract entered into pursuant to this
advertisement, disadvantaged business enterprises will be afforded full opportunity to submit qualifications in response to
this invitation and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color or national origin in consideration for an
award.
The City of Spokane Valley encourages disadvantaged, minority, and women-owned CONSULI'AN'r firms to respond.
Persons with disabilities may request this information be prepared and supplied in alternate forms by calling the City of
Spokane Valley City Hall at (509) 921-1000.
January 15, 2007 City Center Property Negotiations Page 3 of 1 I
ATTACHMENT A - PART I
GENERAL, INFORMATION
A. Legal Name of Applicant Company
B. Name of Contact Person
Title
Telephone lumber including area code
C. Did outside individuals/agencies assist with preparation ofthis program? _ YES _ NO
If "Yes", please describe:
D, RECEIPT OF Af DWDA: Firm acknowledges receipt of the following addenda if any:
Addendum No.
Addendum No.
Addendum No.
Addendum No.
Dated
Dated
Dated
Dated
I certify that to the best of my knowledge the information contained in this RFQ for qualifications is accurate and complete
and that I have the legal authority to commit this agency to a contractual agreement. I realize the final funding for any
service is based upon funding levels and the approval of the Spokane Valley City Council.
Print Name
Signature, Administrator, or Applicant Agency
Title
Date
January 15, 2007 City Center Property Negotiations Page 4 of .11
~,-,-»SDMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION
A. FIRM:
1. Name of firm:
ATTACTI MENT A - PART 2
2. Business address including zip code:
3. Telephone number including area code:
4. Fax number including area code:
5. Federal Tax Identification Number:
6. Washington State UBI Number if issued:
7. State Industrial Account Identification Number if issued:
8. Following is a listing of all engagements the company has undertaken in the last five years that have resulted
in:
(a) Arbitration or litigation and the disposition of the cases.
(b) Claims being filed by the Federal Government or the Washington State Departments of L & 1,
Employment Security or Revenue.
(c) Liens or claims recorded with the Spokane County Auditor by suppliers or subcontractors. List with
whom, for what, and amount.
B. INSURANCE COMPANY:
1. Name of Insurance Company
2. Name of Insurance Agent:
3. Address including zip code:
4. Telephone number including area code:
January 15, 2007 City Center Property Negotiations Page 5 of l l
ATTACHMENT B - EVALUATION CRITERIA AND WEIGHTS
It is strongly recommended that this be used as the outline for your response.
Criteria Description (Evaluation Weight
1. PROJECT TEAM EXPERIENCE &c QUALIFICATIONS .......................................................................................20
a. Summarize the relevant experience and qualifications of your Project Manager, Project Engineer, Lead Designer
and other key personnel. Discuss the ways in which the experience and qualifications of these individuals would
benefit the City on this project.
b. Discuss the capabilities/benefits of any specialty staff and/or subconsultant~s that you have included on your team for
this project.
c. Address the home office and availability of the team members and the support staff throughout the anticipated
proiect time frarne.
2. FIRM'S EXPERIENCE WiTFI SIMILAR PROJECTS ............................................................................................30
a. Provide information regarding the track record of the firm in negotiating complex real estate and development
agreements on behalf of government agencies.
b. Provide references (with contact names and telephone numbers) for similar projects completed within the last three
years.
c. Provide descriptions of two similar projects undertaken recently by the firm; discuss the size and complexity of the
projects, the special issues, and the challenges that were addressed.
d. Address the firm's success in conforming to the schedules and budgets for the projects.
3. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING & APPROACH .......................................................................................................2.-_..
a. Describe the firm's capacity to recognize "project specific" issues and develop creative solutions to address them.
b. Provide two examples of challenges and resulting solutions from previous projects.
c. Describe the ways in which the firm will apply knowledge gained from past projects to specific issues on this
project.
d. Describe the firm's tirmiliarity with relevant environmental code., and standards.
4. PROJECT MANAGEMENT & SCHEDULE .............................................................................................................20
a. Describe the involvement and the duties of the project manager in detail, with a clear description of the ways 41
which productivity will be monitored, and the project will be kept on budget and on schedule.
b. Discuss the quality control measures that will be put in place, and describe the stages of document review and the
team members that will be involved and their responsibilities.
c. Provide a schedule for the project, identifying key milestones and exhibiting knowledge of the various activities
involved under the major tasks.
5. ORGANIZATION AND CLARITY OF RFQ SUBMITTAL ......................................................................................5
The organkuition of the RFQ submittal and the manner in which information is presented in the submittal is an
indication of the firm's ability to assemble clear and concise document,,.
TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS 100
January 15, 2007 City Center Property Negotiations Page 6 of 11
ATTACHMENT C - MANDATORY TERMS AND CONDITIONS
'he City will prepare contracts based upon a scope of work and fee as negotiated and approved by the CONSULTANT and
the City. The following are minimum conditions that shall be incorporated in contracts resulting from this RFQ. Firms
considering responding to this RFQ are well advised to take these paragraphs into consideration when making their
decision whether to submit a response or not.
Should the City and CONSULTANT flail in their negotiations the City reserves the right to end negotiations, at a time of it-,
choosing, and begin negotiations with the next "most highly qualified finn. Failure to negotiate a scope of work and fee
will not terminate the s "eligibility" status.
OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS: All drawings, plans, specifications and other deliverable documents under this
agreement will become the property of the City without restriction, reservation or qualification. Any reuse without written
verification or adaptation by CONSULTANT for the specific purpose intended, will be at the City's sole risk and without
liability or legal exposure to CONSULTANT arising out of or resulting therefore. Any such verification or adaptation will
entitle CONSULTANT to further compensation at rates to be agreed upon by the City and CONSULTANT.
INSURANCE: The CONSULTANT shall continue coverage meeting the requirements of this RFQ for the
duration of the contract.
VENUE STIPULATION: This Agreement has and shall be construed as having been made and delivered in the
State of Washington and the laws of the State of Washington shall be applicable to its construction and enforcement of this
Agreement or any provision hereto shall be instituted only in the courts of competent jurisdiction within Spokane County,
Washington.
INDEMNIFICATION: The CONSULTANT agrees to defend, indemnify and hold the City harmless from any and
ail claims, including but not limited to reasonable attorney fees, demands, losses and liabilities to or by third parties arising
from, resulting from, an error, omission or negligent act of the CONSULTANT performed under this contract by the
CONSULTANT, its agents or employees to the fullest extent permitted by law. The CONSULTANT's duty to indemnify
the City shall not apply to liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damage to property caused by or
resulting from the sole negligence of the City, its agents or employees. The CONSULTANTs duty to indemnify the City
for liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damage to property caused by or resulting from the
concurrent negligence or (a) the City, its agents or employees, and (b) CONSULTANT, its agents or employees shall apply
only to the extent of negligence of the CONSULTANT or its agents or employees. CONSUL`I'ANTs duty to defend,
indemnify and hold the City harmless shall include, as to all claims, demands, losses and liability to which it applies, the
City's personnel-related costs, reasonable attorney's fees, court costs and all other claim-related expenses.
The CONSULTANT's indemnification shall specifically include all claims for loss liability because of wrongful
payments under the Uniform Conunereial Code, or other statutory or contractual liens or rights or third parties, including
taxes, accrued or accruing as a result of this contract or work performed or materials furnished directly or indirectly because
of this contract.
CONSULTANT further agrees that this duty to indemnify City applies regardless of any provisions in RCW Title
51 to the contrary, including but not limited to any immunity of CONSULTANT for liability for injuries to
CONSUL,TANT's workers and employees, and CONSULTANT hereby waives any such immunity for the purpose of this
duty to indemnify City.
RELATIONSHIP OF 114.E. PARTIES: The parties intend that an independent contractor relationship will be
j waated by this Agreement. The City is interested only in the results that could be achieved and the conduct and control of
_,J services will be solely with the CONSULTAN`T'. No agent, employee, servant or otherwise of the CONSULTANT shall
be deemed to be an employee, agent, servant, or otherwise of the City for any purpose and the employees of the
January 15, 2007 City Center Property Negotiations Page 7 of I 1
CONSULTANT are not entitled to any of the benefits that the City provides for City employees. The CONSULTANT" will
be solely and entirely responsible for its acts and the acts of its agents, employees, servants, subcontractors or otherwise,
during the performance of this Agreement.
OT -fr.R EMPLOYMENT: Contracts resulting from this RFQ are not exclusive services Agreements. The
CONSULTANT may take on other professional assignments while completing work tinder this RFQ.
PAYMENT OF TAXES: This Contract is for the employment of the CONSULTANT as an independent
contractor. The CONSULTANT holds that they are an independent contractor doing business as listed above and is solely
responsible for paying any and all taxes associated with the work of this Agreement including but not necessarily limited to
income and social security taxes.
January 15, 2007 City Center Property Negotiations Page 8 of 11
ATTACHMENT P - INSURANCI, REQULREMENTS
~JllEMNIFICATiQN /HOLD HARMLESS: CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, it-, officers,
officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits including attorney
fees, arising out ofor resulting from the acts, errors or omissions of the CONSULTANT in performance of this Agreement,
except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City.
INSURANCE: The CONSULTANT shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against
claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the
work hereunder by the CONSULTANT, its agents, representatives, or employees.
Minimum Scope of Insurance: CONSULTANT shall obtain insurance of the types described below:
1. Automobile Liability insurance covering all owned, non-owned, hired and leased vehicles. Coverage
shall be written on insurance Services Office (ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute form providing
equivalent liability coverage. If necessary, the policy shall be endorsed to provide contractual liability
coverage.
2. Commercial General Liabi%, insurance shall be written on ISO occurrence form CO 00 01 and shall
cover liability arising from premises, operations, independent contractors and personal iniury and
advertising injury. The City shall be named as an insured under the CONSULTANT,s Commercial
General Liability insurance policy with respect to the work performed for the City.
3. Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the industrial Insurance laws of the State of
Washington.
4. Professional _Uahility insurance appropriate to the CONSULTANT's profession.
Minimum Amounts of Insurance: CONSULTANT shall maintain the following insurance limits:
1. Aut mobile Liability insurance with a minimum combined single limit for bodily injury and property
damage of $1,000,000 per accident.
2. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written with limits no less than $1,000,000 each
occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate.
3. Professional Liability insurance shall be written with limits no less than $1,000,000 per claim and
$1,000,000 policy aggregate Iimit.
OTHER INSURANCE PROVISIONS: The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following
provisions for Automobile Liability, Professional Liability and Commercial General Liability insurance:
1. The CONSULTANT's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respect the City. Any
insurance, self-insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of the
CONSULTANT's insurance and shall not contribute with it.
2. The CONSULTANT's insurance shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be cancelled by
either party, except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested,
has been given to the City.
ACCEPTABILrl'Y OF INSURERS: insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not less
Yn A:VI;1.
January 15, 2007 City Center Property Negotiations Page 9 of 1 i
VERIFICATION OF COVERAGE: CONSULTANT shall furnish the City with original certificates and a copy of the
amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the
insurance requirements of the CONSULTANT before commencement of the work.
January 15, 2007 City Center Property Negotiations Page 10 of 1 l
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: January 9, 2007 City Manager Sign--off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information X admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Dangerous Dog Appeal procedures
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 7.30
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Resolution 03-046 delegating authority to BoCC to
hear appeals relating to dangerous dogs and potentially dangerous dogs. Administrative report
to Council on December 12, 2006.
BACKGROUND: The Board of Commissioners for Spokane County have considered appeals of
determinations that certain dogs are "dangerous" as that term is defined in City Code. The
BoCC recently advised the City that they are going to discontinue doing these appeals for us.
This change of appeal body meant that the City would need to revise some of its appeal
procedures in the municipal code. On December 12, 2006, the Council gave staff direction to
Ji
redraft the procedures in a manner that sends appeals of administrative decisions to the
Hearing Examiner, whose decision would be final, appealable to Superior court.
Currently, we have adopted the County regulations under Spokane County Code 5.04 by
reference. In drafting and discussing the changes with the Hearing Examiner and Nancy Hill,
they expressed a belief that it would be more clear for Animal Control and the Hearing Examiner
to use the regulations if we were to customize the County regulations to the City, and adopt
them as our own.
Based on that, I am re-drafting all of the County code sections in 5.04, reformatting them for
adoption as SVMC 7.30.100, et seq. I will continue reviewing and discussing the proposed
changes with County staff prior to first reading, scheduled for January 23, 2007.
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: None needed, update only.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT: Cary P. Driskell, Deputy City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS:
S#64
11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhail@spokanevalley.org
Memorandum
Date: January 3, 2006
To: City Council; Dave Mercier, City Manager; Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager
From: Mike Jackson, Parks and Recreation Director
Re: Contract for Architectural and Engineering Services for Outdoor Pool Renovations
The City of Spokane Valley advertised a Request for Proposal for architectural firms to conduct
public input meetings, review existing pool conditions and provide consulting, design and
architectural services to renovate and remodel the City's three outdoor swiminuig pools. Two
proposals were received. Eased on the proposals, Mike Jackson, Parks and Recreation Director
and Steve Worley, Senior Engineer for Capital Improvement Projects have been negotiating
scope of work and fees with ORII Architects of Renton, Washington.
The standard City of Spokane Valley Agreement for Professional Services is being developed for
this work and the fee for Architectural and Engineering services is currently estimated at
$196,711.00. The fee is based on a total project cost is $1,600,000.
The preliminary project schedule calls :for pre-design beginning in January/February 2007 with
the project to be bid in June 2007. Construction is anticipated to begin at the close of the 2007
swimming season and be completed prior to the 2008 opening.
CITI n~F
pd ane
j Valley
11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhaUspokanevatley.org
Memorandum
Date: January 3, 2007
To: Dave Mercier, City Manager; Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager
From: Mike Jackson, Parks and Recreation Director
Re: Cyclocross
Emde Sports hosted the state Cyclocross (bicycle cross country race) event at Valley Mission
Park on November 10, 2006. This event was very successful with over 100 riders attending the
event. There was minimal damage to the turf which was quickly corrected by Einde Sports.
Erode Sports feels that they have a good chance of-winning the bid to bring the National
Cyclocross Finals to Spokane Valley in 2009 and 2010.
I met with Michael and Marla of Emde Sports and the Chris Frye with the Regional Sports
Conunission on December 12`x'. They are requesting that the City make Valley Mission Park
available for the National Cyclocross event at Valley Mission Park in 2009 and 2010.
An event of this magnitude (1,000 riders) would cause considerable damage to the turf at Valley
'i\,tission Park which could be repaired with reseeding. Emde Sports along with the Sports
Commission is willing to provide all of the material and services to repair. The economic impact
which the race will have on Spokane Valley is significant and should outweigh the damage that
will be caused to the turn in the park..
It is my recommendation that we consider hosting the National Cyclocross at Valley Mission
Park.. I will provide additional details as they become available.
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: January 9, 2007 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
X information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Agreement for use of Geiger work crews
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 39.34 Interlocal Agreement Act
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None
BACKGROUND: The City has, from time to time, utilized Geiger work crews to perform certain
manual labor in the City's rights-of-way, primarily for weed abatement. This was done prior to a
contract being formally executed.
Staff wanted to formalize the relationship and spell out the terms under which future work would
be performed. Several draft agreements have been discussed, and staff is close to forwarding
a proposed final draft.
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: NA
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Use of crews is $250 per half day.
STAFF CONTACT: Cary P. Driskell, Deputy City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS:
it
i