The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2007, 01-09 Regular MeetingAGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR 117IE- ETING Council Meeting #107 Tuesday, January 9, 2007 6:00 p.m. CITY IIIAL.L AT REDWOOD PLAZA 11707 East Sprague Avenue, First Floor Council Requests All Eketronic Devices be Turned OR During Council Meeting CALL TO ORDER: NVOCATION: Pastor Dave Smith, Living Water Community Church PUTI)GE OF ALLEGIANCE: ROLL. CALL: AN'ROVAL ()l;' A(;FIN DA: LN-IRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GAFSTS AND PRESENTATIONS: New Employee Introduction: Building Official Mary Kate Martin, by Community Devcloprncnt Director Marina Sukup CONINIFITEV., BOARD, LIAISON SUNIAtARY REPORTS: ~!-XYOR'S R-LPORT: PUBLIC COMNIEFI TS: Except where indicated below for "public comment" this is an opportunity for the public to yak on any topic. When you come to the podium, please ate your name and address for the record and limit remarks to three minute. 1. PUBLIC IIEARL'V'G: Extension of UR- I Zoning - Marina Sukup 2. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. A Cotmcilmember may remove an item from the Consent Agenda to be considered sepanttcly. a. Following Claim Vouchers: VOUCHER LIST DATE VOUCHER Ns TOTAL VOUCHER AMOUNT 12-08-2006 10551 6.25 12-08-2006 10552 5,5-48.45. 12-08-2006 10550- 10553-10607 406 852.77 12-15-2006 10608:10615-10676 (excluding 224,636.19 voided 1062 and 10646) 12-26-2006 10677-10736 (excluding voided 301,499.14 _ 10686 and 10702) 80 938 542 GRAND TOTAL. , . b. Payroll for Period Ending December 15, 2006: $161,392.16 c. Payroll for Period Ending December 31, 2006: 52 19,620.94 d. Ratification of January 2, 2007 City Ball Closure e. Minutes of D"-ember 12, 2006 Council Regular Nieoting f. Minutes of December 19, 2006 Council Study Session Meeting L n~ Cotmril A&=& 01.09-07 Regular Mfeeting Page I of 2 NFtiV 131 SINE- SS 3. First Reading Proposed Ordirumce 07-001 Extending UR-1 Zone - Marina Sukup [public comment[ 4. First Rcading Proposed Ordinance 07-002 Street Vacation Portion of ) 5'h Avenue - Karen Kendall [public comment] 5. Motion Consideration: Fiber Internet Service for CentcrPlacc -Mike Jackson [public comment[ PUBLIC CON1btENTS Except where indicated above for "public comment" this is an opportunity foe the public 10',peak on snN topic. Whcn you conic to the podium, please stale your name and address fm the recent and limit remark-; to three trunute, ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: 6. Request for Qualifications for City Center Consulting Services - Scatt Kuhl 7. Proposed Ordinance Amending Dangerous Dog Appeals - Cary Driskell INFORMATION ONLY: 8. Contract for ArchitecturcJEngincering Services for Outdoor Pool Renovation - Mike Jas 9. Cyclo-Cross (Bicycles) Event - Mike Jackson 10 City Use of Geiger Wort: Crews - Cary Driskell EXECtI FIVE, SYSSU)N: AlMOURNMEN'r FUTURE SCHEDULE Regular Council Afeetingr are generally held 2nd and 4'* Tuesdays, beginning at 6:00 p. HL Council Study Sessions are generalhr held 1, fd and 5th Tuesdays, beginning at 6:00 p.m. Tuesday. Februarv 13. 2007: No Meeting (Association of Washington Cities Confcrence) Other Tentative L7i orninm4feetinps~Events: Surat~tlt~~~p cwav revjt lizatiun an Public Meatinas and Wockshms; 'rues, January 16, 2007: Special Workshop Meeting, 6:00 p.m. Decades Banquet Room NOTICE: Indi-viduais ptanning to attend the meeting whn require special assistance to accommodate physical, having, or other impairments, please conmet the City Clergy; at (509) 921-11000 ns uinn as passible w that a mnucmcnts tttsy be made, uundl Agenda 01-09-G7 Kegular Meeting Page CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 9, 2007. City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ® public hearing ® information ❑ admin. report ® pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: An ordinance extending the UR-1 Urban Residential Estate Interim Zoning for a fourth six months in the Ponderosa and Rotchford Neighborhoods and amending the findings of fact and work plan. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35A.63.220, Spokane Valley Ordinance 05-025 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Ordinance No. 06-019 extending the Interim Zoning for an additional six months to coincide with the adoption of Spokane Valley - Development Regulations. BACKGROUND: An interim zoning ordinance may be renewed for one or more six-month periods if a public hearing is held and findings of fact are made prior to each renewal. The purpose of interim zoning is to maintain a status quo. The UR-1 interim zoning does not impose a moratorium on construction, but does restrict further subdivision of land within the Ponderosa and Rotchford neighborhoods. The Interim UR-1 Urban Residential Estate Zoning was originally effective on September 8, r- 2004. A third renewal of six months was authorized until March 6, 2007. The updated work plan had anticipated completion of development regulations, design guidelines and performance standards implementing the Spokane Valley 2006-2026 Comprehensive Plan prior to this date. The completion of development regulations is not expected to be complete until March 31, 2007, with actual rezoning with notice to affected property owners within six months thereafter. It is anticipated that the development regulations will provide for an "R-1 - Residential Estate Zoning District", with the same or similar provisions as those of the interim UR-1 district. The City has received a single objection to continuance of the interim zoning regulation. The objection centered on the minimum 40,000 square foot requirement for new lots. OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: n/a BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Not applicable. STAFF CONTACT: Marina Sukup, Community Development Director ATTACHMENTS: Draft ordinance - see agenda Item. 03 Spo"ne ,;o$ Valley UR-1 Residential Estate Interim Zoning Extension #4 Public Hearing Community Development Department January 9, 2007 BACKGROUND • Authorized pursuant to RCW 35A.63.105, WAC 365-195-845, WAC 365-195-855, and the City's Interim Comprehensive Plan • Interim UR-1 Residential Estate Zoning was initially approved by City Council on August 24, 2004, pursuant to Ordinance No. 04-035 and effective on September 8, 2004, and valid for a period of 12 months with Findings of Fact and a Work Plan • The third extension of the UR-1 zoning was approved in September 2006 pursuant to Ordinance No. 06-019. • Finding of Fact and the Work Plan have been updated 1 i Rotchford Acres/Shelley Acres Addn CV.High School 1 2 Background • The work plan anticipated completion of development regulations, design guidelines and performance standards implementing the Spokane Valley 2006-2026 Comprehensive Plan prior to March 6, 2007. • The completion of development regulations is not expected to be complete until March 31, 2007, with actual rezoning with notice to affected property owners within six months thereafter. • It is anticipated that the development regulations will provide for an "R-1 - Residential Estate Zoning District", with the same or similar provisions as those of the interim UR-1 district. E;MWA •C RBISW UR-1 Werfm Zacdna Wert Plan January 1, 2007 XJ . Tail A>.ri- - Sw. Fi h " • ocr'- AnY.n oia o. it mu air _ w V' ~ M q W y m Mor i`r "M+ .Wr Y IM M N I udarrwmooa cn-a~i 304076 Wu2m ►.2w hm~ 2 ca.Qrn.tn.rm:' . AAg1-a ' !s27ie sur:oe Y . es ` 5. DaCQ, 0.0.y 3M= Uhl= 37r - Ensl wCUUR ]nR001 T&TO:7 Ir 41 / . 5' S-RiN Cn~l gaM-P, 72.:07e "TzSr]p07- OO Ir 6 P.M. He-MSO.Ury SERC06 L7=:0! :Iw 7 H-z W a fyf : Lace-- - 3.=DO_S awnwf '7 ' ?:r.-a 9.6. eM07e ir17170:4 52.eo 0 Rmut-rary Re.1- 70nnooa 2ra=1 ow to 1 "m YZT.'luCle 1!]R067 :1 R-aanr: Cvrnlata '-~r19:b7 ill: Ve0C7 1M - Rv.6nf BCNOA 3 r Recommendation • Planning Commission recommended extending the interim UR-1 zoning for six months, adopting the Revised Findings of Fact and Workplan • Staff concurs with the recommendation of the Planning Commission f- 4 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 01-09-07 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: x consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Following Vouchers: VOUCHER LIST DATE VOUCHER ##s TOTAL VOUCHER AMOUNT 12-08-2006 10551 6.25 12-08-2006 10552 5,548.45 12-08-2006 10550; 10553-10607 406 852.77 12-15-2006 10608; 10615-10676 (excluding 224 636.19 voided 10622 and 10646 , 12-26-2006 10677-10736 (excluding voided 301,499.14 10686 and 10702 GRAND TOTAL 938,542.80 RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Approve claims for vouchers as listed above. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: Amy Sienknecht ATTACHMENTS Voucher Lists vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 1210812006 4:36:18PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 10551 .12/412006 000324 SPOKANE COUNTY WATER DIST. #3 12042006 WATER,BILLING '6.25 1 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 1 Vouchers in this report I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services, rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify to said claim. Finance Director Date Total : 6.25 Bank total : 6.25 Total vouchers : 6.25 APPROVED: Ken Thompson, ance Director Mayor Wilhite A / 2-/2- Date -,age: 1 vchlist 12/08/2006 1:03:55PM Bank code: apbank Voucher List Spokane Valley Page' Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 10552 12/812006 000028 FARMERS 8 MERCHANTS BANK 1217 1225 1829 1852 5045 5169 1 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 1 Vouchers in this report APPROWD: Total vouchers : 5,548.45 I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been fumished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as dcscribod herein and that the claim Is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify to said claim. Finance Director Date 1 Descrtption/Account Amount MERCIER'S CARD 104.62 GOLMAN'S CARD 863 96 GENERAL CARD #1 . 2 772 07 GENERAL CARD #4 , . 1 550 07 DEVLEMING'S CARD , . 114 17 WILHITE'S CARD . 143.56 Total : 5,548.45 Bank total : 5,548.45 Ken Thompson, . ' ance Director Mayes ~4 ~ /2--1 i - OC. Date Page: 1 vablist ::Vouches list ~ 1210812006 4:18:43P M Page: 1 Spo,kane:Valley,_ Bank code : apbank Voucher . Date. Vendor Invoice: PO # . Description/Account 10550 11/30/2005 000898 SPOKANE PROCARE 11302006 Amount LANDSCAPING SERVICES 5,529.39 10553 12/8/2006 000335 ALTON'S TIRE INC. 6-20645 Total : 5,529.39 - 04 DAKOTA SERVICE MAINTENAN( 56 56 6-20914 03 EXPLORER VEHICLE MAINTENA . 40.60 10554 12/8/2006 .000400 AMER INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS 2000788557 Total : 97.16 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 675.00 10555 1218/2006 000212 ATTORNEY NOTARY SUPPLY 092106 Total : 675.00 NOTARY.STAMP FOR CARRIE ACO 46.78 Total : 46.78 10556 12/8/2006 000030 .AV:I$TA UTILITIES 12012006 - BILLING DATE 11/27/2006 5,759.14 10557 1218/2006 000918. BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY, INC. 877 167 Total : 5,759.14 , - LINEN SUPPLY FOR CENTERPLACI 213 36 8773052 LINEN SUPPLY FOR CENTERPLACI . 235.63 Total : 448.99 10558 12/8/2006 '001022- CARR SALES CO. 922117t 41405 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 182.38. Total : 182.38 10559 12/8!2006 000729 CH2MHILL INC. 3577526 40691 0009 - VALLEY CORRIDOR ENV ST' . 9,059.39 Total : 9,059.39 10560 12/8/2006 000379 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY 12042006 BILLING 48.00 Total : 48.00 10561 12/8/2006 000957 COBALTTRUCK EQUIPMENT 20320 " 41390 PICK-UP ACCESSORIES FOR F2 50 1,257.31 10562 12/8/2006 '000109 COFFEE SYSTEMS INC Total : 1,257.31 45705 COFFEE ORDER 1211/2006 142.33 Total : 142.33 10563 1218/2006 000508 CONOCOPHILLIPS FLEET 870166725611 GAS CHARGES' 10/26-11126 1,591.05 Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List 12108/2006. 4:18:43PM Spokane-Valley Page: 2 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date. Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 10563 12!812006 000508 000508. CONOCOPHILLIPS FLEET (Continued)' Total : 1,591:05 10564 12/8!2006 000326 CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DIST, #19 120106 WATER BILLING 70.57 120106-2 WATER BILLING 52.30 Total 122.87 10565 12/8/2006 001120 CVS'WHOLESALE FLAGS 100467695 41264 OPERATING SUPPLIES 186.06 Total : 186.06 10566 12/8/2006 001194 DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY, CASHIERI I 7222 CERTIFICATION'RENEWAL 30.00 Total : 30.00 10567 12/8/2006 001134 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 10460 CERTIFICATION RENEWAL 42.00 Total : 42.00 10568 1218/2006 000686 DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING 12012006 LICENSE-RENEWAL 99.00 Total : 99.00 10569 12/8/2006 000152 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION re-313-atb61114076 MONTHLY MAINTENANCE 3,868.50 re-313-atb61114077 MONTHLY MAINTENANCE 7,452.07 re-313-atb61114111 PINESIMANSFIELD PROJECT 2,132.86 re-313-atb61114113 . ARGONNE ROAD OVERLAY-. 38.09 Total : 13,511.52 10570 12/8/2006 000059 DEVLEMING, MICHAEL 12052006 REIMBURSEMENT 78,76 Total : 78.76 10571 12/8/2006 000246 EAST SPOKANE WATER DIST #1 12042006 WATER BILLING . 93.74 12042006-2 WATER BILLING 311.93 12042006-3 WATER BILLING 293.97 124/0412006 WATER BILLING 148.51 Total : 848.15 10572 1218/2006 000171 GEIGER CORRECTIONS CENTER 41500149 SEPTEMBER 2006 HOUSING INVOI 93,289.93 Total : 93,289.93 10573 12/8/2006 000007 GRAINGER- 923463237.1 , • 41402 _ GRAINGER TRASH PUMP. 132.58 9234632389 41402 GRAINGER TRASH PUMP 88.03 s: 2 vchlisf -J UC .Li 11108/2006 -4:18:43PM O her• st Spokane Valley Page: 3 Bank code : 'apbank Voucher 10573 Date Vendor: 1218/2006 000007 GRAINGER Invoice (Continued) PO # Description/Account. Amount 9234806447 9236619467 41402 41301 GRAINGER TRASH PUMP GRAINGER - MISC. NEEDS 2,228.71 38.04 10574 12/8/2008 000002 H & H BUSINESS'SYSTEMS INC. 152382 Total : MONTHLY CONTRACT CHARGES 2,487.36 66.10 10575 1218/2006 000222 ICMA RETIREMENT'CORP. 017235 Total : EMPLOYEE APPRECIATION 66.10 375.00 10576 12/8/2006 000117-JOURNALjNEWS PUBLISHING INC. ~ - ` 28419 28420 28421 28422 28423 48971 49139 - 49140. Total : ADVERTISING ADVERTISING ADVERTISING ADVERTISING ADVERTISING ADVERTISING ADVERTISING ADVERTISING 375.00 25.00 66.00 81.00 63.00 66.00 40.00 40.00 150.00 Total : 531.00 • 10577 12/8/2006 000864 _JUB ENGINEERS, INC. 0042714 41166 06-001 STREET MASTER PLAN 16,267.78 Total : 16,267.78 10578 12/812006 000933, LAW SEMINARS INTERNATIONAL 29982. PUBLICATIONS FOR LEGAL 100.00 Total : 100.00 10579 12/8/2006 000755 LEAGUE OF-OREGON CITIES 4605 WEB ADS 50.00 10580 12/8/2006 000993 LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER 268435 744691 744692 744699 Total : TIRE MAINTENANCE 06769D PICK-UP MAINTENANCE 32809D PICK-UP MAINTENANCE 40203D PICK-UP MAINTENANCE 50.00 959.85 48,87 48.87 24.44 Total : 1,082.03 10581 12/812006'001058 MCROBERTS, CAROLINE 12042006 REIMBURSEMENT 18.91 Page: 3 vchlist 1210812006 4:18:43PM Voucher-List ; Spokane Valley Page: 4 Bank code : apbank , Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account, Amount 10581 121812006 001058 001058 MCROBERTS, CAROLINE (Continued) ; • Total : 18.91 10582 121812006 000662' NATIONAL BARRICADE & SIGN CO., OF 53636 41303 NATIONAL BARRICADE -MISC. NEI 16.29 Total : 16.29 10583 12/8/2006 001035 NETWORK DESIGN & MANAGEMENT 14627 MONTHLY MAINTENANCE & OTHEf 2,502.50 Total : 2,502.50 10584, 12/812006 000652 OFFICE DEPOT.INC. 362035035-001 41395 OFFICE SUPPLIES 69.13 363017214-001 41406 OFFICE SUPPLIES 14.06 363584784-001 41410 TONER CARTRIDGE FOR TRISH 1,330.74 363660371-001 41411. SUPPLIES -FOR-AMY 41.31 36366047.4001 41411 SUPPLIES FOR AMY 32.59 363765122=001 41412 OFFICE DEPOT 274.18 Total : 1,762.01 10585 12/812006 000512 OFFICETEAM 17208405 SERVICES FOR ANGELA FINCH 528.00 17245063 SERVICES FOR KIMBERLY WILLIAt 515.63 •17259289 SERVICES FOR CENTERPLACE 120.96 17301279 SERVICES FOR CENTERPLACE 483.84 Total : 1,648.43 10586 12/8/2006 001033 PFLIEGER, CHARLIE 12042006 REIMBURSEMENT 737.13 Total : 737.13 10587 12/812006 000119 PIP PRINTING INC. 1330035954 Business cads and nameplate for To 175.16 1330036138 CAFR PRINTING 504.83 Total : - 679.99 10588 12/8/2006 001089 POE ASPHALT PAVING, INC. 42217. 41325 CONTRACT NO.06-019 POE ASPHA 62,007.71 Total: 62,007.71 10589 12/8/2006 000494 PRO PEOPLE STAFFING SERV INC. 18,165 SERVICES FOR CENTERPLACE 1,663.58 Total : 1,663.58 10590 1218/2006 000041 PROTHMAN COMPANY 2006-652 BUILDING OFFICIAL SEARCH EXPE 992.78 2006-661 - ,RECRUITMENT OF BUILDING OFFI( 5,757.00 -le: 4 vchlisf J Voucher List Page: 5 110812006 - 4:18:43PM Spokane;Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher 10 " Date Vendor _ 'Y ' Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 590 10591 12/8/20 06 1218/2006 000041" 000041 PROTHMAN COMPANY 001161 PROVISIONAL STAFFING SERVICES (Continued) 3008-0500013906 Total : SERVICES FOR MATT KUSHNER 6,749.78 690.66 10592 1218/2006 000019 PURRFECT LOGOS, INC. 17612 41400 _ Total: STAFF CLOTHING 690.66 36.92 10593 1218/2006 000322 QWEST 11282006 Total : ACCOUNT NUMBER: 509-228-0669 36.92 340.13 10594 12/8/2006 000709.: SENSKE.LAWN & TREE CARE INC.-. 1558390 1558391 Tota l : LAWN CARE SERVICES LAWN CARE SERVICE 340.13 48,822.92 1,900.50 10595 121,812006 000854 SHERRY PRATT VAN VOORHIS, INC 759.03 41214 Total : MIRABEAU OVERLOOK 50,723.42 960.00 10596 12/812006 000726 SHUR KLEEN SERVICES, INC. 66027 41350 Total : JANITORIAL - CARPET CLEANING 960.00 320.00 Total : 320.00 10597 12/8/2006 001156 SIENKNECHT, AMY 12042008 REIMBURSEMENT 31.60 Total : 31.60 10598 12/8/2008 001195 SPOKANE POLICE DEPARTMENT. ATTN'12052006 POLICE DEPT. GRANT MATCH 97,422.00 Total : 97,422.00 10599 12/8/2006 000954 SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH, DISTRIC' 1242006 PERMIT APPLICATION FOR CENTE 590.00 10600 1 21812 0 0 6 '00031.1,•:SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P: - ° 11152006` Total : CONNECTION CARD-DATA PLANS 590.00 59.09 Total : 59.09 10601 12/812006. 001057 STAR RENTALS 13-111650.02 41304 STAR RENTAL OPEN PO FOR MISC 44.80 Total : 44.80 10602 12/8/2006 000773 STUDIO CASCADE, INC. 1111 GENERAL PLANNING SERVICES - 5,280.00 Total : 5,280.00 Page: 5 vchlist -Voucher.Ust Page: 12108/2006 4:18:43PM - „y Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank a. Voucher Date 'Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptiorilAccount Amount 10603 12/8/2005 000093 THE SPOKESMAN-REVIEW INC. 11302006 ADVERTISING 78.36 Total : 78.36 10604 12/8/2006 000167 VERA WATER & POWER 12042006 BILLING DATE 11/21/2006 463.95 Total : 463.95 10605 12/812006 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 1847974-2681-5 CODE ENFORCEMENT 112.23 Total : 112.23 10606 1218/2006 000688 WEBROOT SOFTWARE, INC. inv0062701 41407 SPYSWEEPER RENEWAL 3 YEAR 849.60 inv0062702 41407 SPYSWEEPER'RENEWAL 3 YEAR, 1,133.20 Total : 1,982.80 10607 .12/812006 000766. YMCA OF THE INLAND NORTHWEST 120106 OCTOBER 2006 - 15,926.00 Total : 15,926.00 56 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 406,852.77 56 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 406,852.77 I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty.of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and-that the claim is just, due and gn'unpald 'obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and'that I am authorized to authenticate and certify to said claim. Finance Director Date APPROVED: Ken Thompson, Finance Director Mayor Wilhite 12- 17, Date Ige: 6 vchlist -:.;,Voucher List 12/15!21106 4:49:58PM page. - - Spokane.Valley. . Bank code : apbank Voucher - Date Vendor Invoice PO # 10608 12/13/2006 000658 SPOKANE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT Spo Co lawsuit 10615 12/15/2006 000958 AAA SWEEPING; LLC 37144 41203 37145-a 41167 10616 12/1512006 000197 AIR INC . 124391 10617 12/1512006 000335 ALTON'S TIRE INC 6-21393 6-21450 6-21473 6-21522' 10618 .12/15/2006 000173 BINGAMAN, GREG 12112008 12152006 10619 12/1512006 000907 BUILDING MAINTENANCE SUPPLY 38294 ~ 41397 39102 41404 10620 12/1512006 001139 CATS EYE EXCAVATING, INC.. 138-141 • 41323 10621 12/15/2006 000143 CITY`OF SPOKANE 12142006 12/1512006 000109 .COFF.EE SYSTEMS INC 1 DescrlptionlAccount Amount FILING FEE FOR SPOKANE COUNT 200.00 Total : 200.00 06-008 VACTORING SERVICES 13,442.32. 06-015 STREET SWEEPING SERVI( 59,495.97 Total : 72,938.29 BACKGROUND CHECKS 50.00 Total : 50.00 MAINTENANCE ON 07 F205 30.23 MAINTENANCE ON 05.DAKOTA 54 98 MAINTENANCE ON 04 F150 . 25 72 02 CHEVY S-10 MAINTENANCE . 22.33 Total : 133.26 QUARTERLY CELL PHONE ALLOW, 105.00 REIMBURSEMENT 3.15 Total:, 108.15 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 11735 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 46.24 . Total : 163.59 CONTRACT NO 06-022 CATS' EYE E 6,577.35 Total : 6,577.35 BILLING DATE 11/28/06 3,109.89 Total : 3,109.89 Page: 10623 Total : 12.60 45705 COFFEE ORDER 12/1/2006 • 42.95 Total: 12/15M2 06 000806 COLUMBIA FIBER SOLUTIONS 316 42.95 41380 FIBER TRANSITION SPLICE FOR St 1,086.00 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 1211512006 4:49:58PM Spokane Valley Bank code : ' apbank Vouclier Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 10624 1214512006 000606 COLUMBIA FIBER SOLUTIONS (Continued) 331 MONTHLY CHARGES 228.06 Total : 1,314.06 10625 12115/2006 000060 DENENNY, RICHARD 12112006 REIMBURSEMENT 35.00 12112006-2 REIMBURSEMENT 46.30 12112006-3 QUARTERLY CELL PHONE REIMBL 105.00 Total : 186.30 10626 12115!2006, 000686 DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING 12152006 CASH TRANSMITTAL 140.00 Total : 140.00 10627 12/15/2006 000693 DEPT OF INFORMATION SERVICES , STi 2006110204 MONTHLY BILLING 24.19 Total : 24.19 10628 12115/2006 000059 DEVLEMING, MICHAEL 12112006 QUARTERLY CELL PHONE REIMBL 105.00 Total : 105.00 10629 12115/2006 000278 DRISKELL, CARY 12152006 REIMBURSEMENT 35.26 12152006-2 REIMBURSEMENT 344.94 Total : 380.20 10630 12115/2006 000246 EAST SPOKANE WATER DIST#1 12142096 BILLING DATE 11/20/2006 1,985.01 Total : 1,985.01 10631 12115/2006 000171 GEIGER CORRECTIONS CENTER 41500162 WORK CREW BILLING 4,426.91 Total : 4,426.91, 10632 12115/2006 000071 GOLMAN, SUE 12142006 REIMBURSEMENT 13.34 Total : 13.34 10633 1211512006 001009 GOTHMANN, WILLIAM H. .12112006- QUARTERLY CELL PHONE; REIMBL.: _ 105.00p 12152.006 RCIMBURSEMENT 228 3~' Total : 333.37 '10634 12115/2006 000002 H & H BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC. 122254 COPIER SUPPLIES 276.54 151426 41384 RICOH AFICIO CL7300D LASER CO 4,410.79 ` ne: 2 vchlist Voucher List 12/15/2006 ' 4:49:58PM Spokane Valley Page: 3 Bank cgde : apbank Voucher Date Vendor ' Invoice PO 10634 12115/20060000002 't-x:000002 'H 8~-H BUSINESS SYSTEMS-INC Description/Account Amount . (Continued) 10635 12/15/2006 000441 HOME DEPOT COMMERCIAL CREDIT 12112008 • ''Total: - •4;687:33Lil CREDIT PLAN CHARGES .2,705.56 10636 12/15/2008 000070 INLAND POWER AND LIGHT CO 12112006 Total : 2,705.56 . BILLING DATE 11/29/2006 423.01 10637 12/1512006 000388 IRVIN WATER DIST. #6 12142006 Total : 423.01 • BILLING DATE 12/1106 166.00 10638 12/15/2006 000117 JOURNAL NEWS PUBLISHING INC 2 Total : 166.00 . ' • 8455 ADVERTISING 39 00 28456 28457 ADVERTISING . 82.50 28458 ADVERTISING 69.75 28459 ADVERTISING 72.00 ADVERTISING 79.50 10639 12/1512006 000012 JOURNAL OF BUSINESS INC. 12112006 Total : 342.75 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 38.00 10640 12115/2006 000864-JUB ENGINEERS, INC. 0041593 Total : 38.00 41418 QUOTE N0.0032-06 CARTE GRAPH 9,991.20 10641 12/15/2006 000755 LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES Total : 9,991.20 4647 ADVERTISING 25.00 10642 12/1512006 000089 MERCIER: DAVID 12152006 Total : 25.00 REIMBURSEMENT 508.87 10643 1211512006 000258 MICROFLEX INC. 00016687 Total : 508.87 SOFTWARE RENTAL 341.63 10644 12/1512006 000132 MODERN ELECTRIC WATER COMPANY. 12112006 Total : 341.63 • BILLING DATE 11/2912008 7,352.70 60645 12/15/2006 000052 MUNSON RICHARD Total : 7,352.70 • , 12112006 QUARTERLY CELL PHONE REIM13l. 105.00 Total : 105.00 Page: 3 vchlist Voucher List Page: 4 1211512006 4:49:58PM Spokane Valley Bank code: Voucher apbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount - ~Y~'.r+"s+o F~~~T~~~ 7,~j~.J ~'~X~, 1~{Qy~t~- ~itg F~_s b a:++ii:.afa~M9~~~5' ~ i.dL. ' -+~itL1t.~fiiLdly.4LC?C37 , ~~1,•7..~J s t c:3~'i`.~:,~''-:~:".. ~~~~.fl>C: 1 Y~ `'.odic» - :•.t '~rL,:•u~r _ .i F ¢:8 m}' ~ i5tal 1,905.95 10647 12/15/2006 001090 NORTHWEST SIGNAL SUPPLY INC. 21777 1)YDMt 41364 QUOTE NO.0028-06CONTROLLERC 3,583.80 Total : 3,583.80 10648 12/1512006 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 364865841-001 41413 Item 825-190-- 2.97 Total : 2:97. 10649 12/15,2006 000307 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER 12142006 STATE REMITTANCES 52,984.47 Total : 52,984.47 10650 1211512006 000512 OFFICETEAM 17016043 SERVICES FOR KIMBERLY WILLIAP 709.50 17024990 SERVICES FOR ANGELA FINCH 511.50 17336649 SERVICES FOR LANCE PECHT 362.88 Total : 1,583.88 10651 12/15/2006 000899 ONEEIGHTY NETWORKS 549228 SERVICE FOR CITY.HALL & CENTE 828.18 Total : 828.18 10652 12/1512006 001197 PECHT, LANCE 12142006 REIMBURSEMENT 27.15 Total : 27.15 10853 12/15/2006 000494 PRO PEOPLE STAFFING SERV INC. 18,372 SERVICES FOR CENTERPLACE 1,451.10 Total : 1,451.10 10654 12115/2006 001161 PROVISIONAL STAFFING SERVICES 3008-0500013952 SERVICES FOR MATT KUSHNER 1 023.20 3008-0509013998 SERVICES FOR MATT KUSHNER , 1,023.20 Total : 2,046.40 10655 12115/2006 000019 PURRFECT LOGOS, INC. 17714 41388 VEHICLE LOGOS 86.88 Total : 86.88 10656. 12/15/2006 000341 RICOH CORPORATION 07000890141 COPIER PAYMENT 238.92 07011875977 COPIER PAYMENT 246.53 07011876246 COPIER PAYMENT 412.68 -Total : 898.13 ,e: 4 J vchlist Voucher List 1211512006 4:49:58PM Spokane Valley Page: 5 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoico PO # 10657 12/1512006 000415 -ROSAUERS U-CITY INC Description/Account' Amount . - 12112006 ACCOUNT PAYMENT 38.72 10658 12/15/2006'000064 SCHIMMELS, GARY 12112006 Total : 38.72 - QUARTERLY CELL PHONE REIMBL 105.00 10659 12/15/2006 000709 SENSKE LAWN & TREE CARE INC. 12152006 Total : 105.00 • - - VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PRO( 68.50 10660 12/15/2006 0011'58 .SIENKNECH T, AMY 12142006' Total : 68.50 ~ • • REIMBURSEM_ ENT 38.99 • 10661 12/15/2006 001140 SPECIAL ASPHALT PRODUCTS invoo37466 Total : 38.99 41414 QUOTE NO. 0031-06 COLD MIX 733.06 10662 12/15/2006 000230 SPOKANE CNTYAUDITORS OFC RECO 12112006 Total : ' 733.06 • , STATEMENT DATE 11/312006 335.00 10563- 12/15/2006 000090 SPOKANE COUNTY INFORMATION SY S 61349 Total : 335.00 , SEPTEMBER 2006 BILLING 13,905.41 10664 12/15/2006 000308 SPOKANE COUNTY PROSECUTING An 12142008 ' Total : 13,905.41 , REMITTANCE FOR CRIME VICTIMS 793.72 10665 12/1512006 000323' SPOKANE COUNTY UTILITIES 12142006 Total : ' 793.72 • BILLING DATE 12/1/2006 1,515.55 10666 ' 12/1512006 000324 SPOKANE COUNTY WATER DIST. #3 12112006 Total : 1,515.55 BILLING DATE 1218/2006 6.75 10667 12/15/2006 000898 SPOKANE PROCARE 12152006 Total : 6.75 41012 LANDSCAPE & WEED SPRAYINGS 4,080.65 10668 12/1512006 000406 SPOKANE REGIONAL CVB 11-06 v contract Total : 4,080.65 MARKETING CONTRACT 13,810.00 10669 12/1512006 000419 SUMMIT LAW GROUP Total : 13,810.00 . 32380 BILLING THROUGH 111301200E 110.00 Total : 110.00 Page: 5 vchlist 1211512006 4:49:58PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 6 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vcndor Invoice PO # Description/Account' • Amount 10670 1211512006 0010063 TAYLOR, STEVE 12112006 QUARTERLY CELL PHONE REIMBL 105.00 Total : 105.00 10671 12/15/2006 001024 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST 61483.867-001 41305 UNITED RENTAL.OPEN FOR MISC. 7.33- 960476 • STATEMENT DATE 11120/06 666.00 Total : 673.33 10672 1211512006 000723 US HEALTH WORKS MEDICAL, GROUP 0157813-wa TESTING FOR MARY K. MARTIN 115.00 Total : 115.00 10673 12115/2006 000167 VERA WATER & POWER 12112006 BILLING DATES 11129/2006-12/71201 2,171.71 12142006 BILLING DATE 11/22/2006 22.70 12142006-2 -BILLING DATE 12/11/2006 - 19.48 Total : 2,213.89 10674 12115/2006 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 0034527-2681-7 WASTE CHARGES 60.62 0036502-1516-3 WASTE SERVICES 666.44 1846356-2681-7 WASTE SERVICES 313.33 Total : 1,040.39 10675 12/15/2006 000061 WILHITE, DIANA 12112006 QUARTERLY CELL PHONE REIMBL 105.00 12152006 REIMBURSEMENT 855.91 Total : 960.91 10676 12/15/2006 000089 XO COMMUNICATIONS, INC., FILE 5055{ 0212120695 PHONE LINE-SERVICE 1,574.45 Total : 1,574.45 63 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 226,554.74 63 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : ,554.74 t ~.S s Ubl E: 6 vchliat r Voucher List Page: 7 1211512006 4:49:58PM Spokane-Valley Bank cede : apbank Voucher Date Vendor* Invoice PO Description/Account Amount the undersigned, do certify under-penalty of-pedury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the tabor performed as described herein and that the claim is•just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify to said claim. Finance Director Date APPROVED: ' G~ Ken Thompson, T'inance Director rlayor Wilhute / 0 ~ Date Page: 7 vchlist Vbucher-List Page: 1 1212612006 9:19:08AM Spokane Valley , .Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptionlAccount Amount 10677 12/26/2006 000150 ALLIED FIRE &'SECURITY svc280464 41424. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 907 Total : 91.77 10678 12/26/2006 001081 ALSCO Ispo129158 MATS-FOR CITY HALL 80.44 Total : 80.44 10679 12!2612006 000335 ALTO N'S TIRE INC. 6-21693 MAINTENANCE ON S-10 33.83 Total : 33.83 10680 12/2612006 000050 APA- INLAND EMPIRE SECTION- 12192006 SEPA TRAINING REGISTRATION 270.00 Total : 270.00 10681 12/2612006 000030 AVISTA UTILITIES 12182006 MASTER ACCOUNT 410069444 19,863.61 Total : 19,863.61 10682 12126/2006 000173 BINGAMAN, GREG 12182006- REIMBURSEMENT 16.02 Total : 16.02 10683 12/2612006 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY, INC. 87749454 SERVICES FOR CENTERPLACE 384.91 8776862 SERVICES FOR CENTERPLACE 469.87 s0043327 SERVICES FOR CENTERPLACE 28.15 Total : 882.93 10684 12/2602006 001176 BROWN, MEL'INDA 12212006 REFUND REQUEST .12.00 Total : 12.00 10685 12/26/2006 001139 CATS EYE EXCAVATING, INC. 144 41323 CONTRACT NO 06-022 CATS EYE f 2,727.73- 146 41323 CONTRACT NO 06-022 CATS EYE f 3,888.82 147 41323 CONTRACT.NO 06-022 CATS EYE f 3,684.14 149 41323 CONTRACT NO 06-022 CATS EYE f 2,902.78 150 41323 CONTRACT NO 06-022 CATS EYE f 323.66 T tal: 13,527.1 3 o _ ....:tee. 1 'r- ..:-+d s.:....M.s'~ x .al ~w~,:~ r , ! 1 g% . ,.a Total : 12.60 106687 12/2612006 OD0571 CODE PUBLISHING COMPANY 27419 SUPPLEMENT UPDATE DEC. 2006 82.54 Page: 1 vchlst Voucher List 1212612006 9:19:08AM _'Spokane'Valley Page: 2 Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 10687:• 12/26/2006 000571 CODE,.PUBLISHING COMPANY (Continued). 27423 UPDATE FOR NOV.-DEC. 2006 26.06 Total : 108.60 10688 1212612006 000109, COFFEE SYSTEMS INC 46113 COFFEE ORDER 12115!2006 158.36 46143 COFFEE ORDER FOR CENTERPLA 76.00 Total : 234.36 10689 12/26/2006 001198 CONGRESS FOR THE NEW URBANISM 12182006 MEMBERSHIP FOR SCOTT KUHTA 185.00 Total : 165.00 10690 12/26/2006 000537 DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, IN 211928 41286 CONTRACT #06-020 DEA DEV. PLA 5,502.04 211931 41286 CONTRACT #06-020 DEA DEV. PLA 6,265.00 Total : 11,767.04 10691 1212612006 001208 DEST1TO, STACI 12212006 REFUND REQUEST 27.00 Total : 27.00 10692 12/26/2006 000059 DEVLEMING, MICHAEL 12192006 REIMBURSEMENT 28.50 Total : 28.50 10693 12/26/2006.000924 ELLER CORPORATION 12222006 41026 0004- BARKER ROAD CONSTRUCT 87,506.08 Total : 87,506.08 10694 12/26/2006 001205 _EMKEN, MICHAEL 12212006 CLASS INSTRUCTION 200.00 Total : 200.00 10695 12/26/2006 001203 FILENKO, VICTORIA 12192006 REFUND REQUEST 221.00 Total : 221.00 10696 12/2612006 001202 'FILIPINO-AMERICAN ASSOCIATONI OF 112192006 REFUND REQUEST 210.50 Total : 210.50 10697 1212612005 001113 FLOORMART 2110 FLOOR INSTALLATION AT CENTER 4,875.00 e, ; _;t T•' . • .x TO~Iti rC'C:yy'.:u4~a.7,$~~,~i .10698 12/2612006 001009 GOTHMANN, WILLIAM H. 12182006 REIMBURSEMENT 1,267:29 Total : 1,267.29 2 ~ y vchlist Voucher List Page: 3 1212612006 9:19:08AM -;SOokane•Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date . Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 10699 12126/2006 000007 GRAINGER 9247030431• 41301 GRAINGER: MISC. NEEDS ' 114.03 Total : 114.03 10700 12/26/2006 000002 H & H BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC. 1081 LEASE PAYMENT 201.97 152802 MONTHLY COPIER RENTAUSERVIr 55.97 152891 MONTHLY COPIER RENTAUSERVI( 93.34 152892 MONTHLY COPIER RENTAUSERVI( 41.68 152899 MONTHLY COPIER RENTAUSERVI( 24.98 152900 MONTHLY COPIER RENTAUSERVI( 21.42 152930 MONTHLY COPIER RENTAUSERVII 38.99 153015. MONTHLY COPIER•RENTAUSERVI! 19.29 Total : 497.64 10701 12/26/2005 000009 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 41267100 HP XWB400 WORKSTATION FOR S 3,672.85 41355 Total:. 3,6 7 2.885 ~t r°R1°l1`.Z - 571 !!ms"rr'MM +I'$ ~ T~7@ 7 2 Total : 328.70 10703 12/2612006 000117 JOURNAL NEWS PUBLISHING INC.' 28477 ADVERTISING 55.00 ' Total : 56.00 10704 1126/2006 001.124 LOTS-N-LAND, LLC 12202006 41273 QUOTE #0016-06, INDIANA SEWER 16,184.92 Total : 16,184.92 10705 12126/2006 001201' MARKET AMERICA, C/O ROGER HICKS 12192006 REFUND REQUEST 50.00 Total : 50.00 10706 12126/2006 000073 MC CORMICK, GREG 12212006 REIMBURSEMENT 66,75 Total : 66.75 10707 12126/2006000132 MODERN ELECTRIC WATER COMPANY 12192b06 BILLING DATE 11/22/06 34.13 12202006 BILLING DATE11/20-11/22 251.45 Total : 285.58 10708 12/26/2006 000662 NATIONAL BARRICADE & SIGN CO., OF 53781 41303 NATIONAL BARRICADE'- MISC. NEI 828.46 Page: 3 vchlist -:-..;Voucher-List Pagc: 4 1212612006 9:19:08AM .•:SpokaneValley - Bank code : apbank Voucher. Date Vendor. Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 10708 12126/2006 000662 ' 000662 NATIONAL BARRICADE & SIGN CO., (Continued) Total : 828.46 10709 12/26/2006 000283 NATIONAL RECREATION & PARK, ASSO 20024700 41394 PUBLICATIONS. 192.00 Total : 192.00 10710 12/26/2006 001035 .NETWORK DESIGN & MANAGEMENT 14693 41420 SENTINEL IPS APPLIANCE 1,905.95 ' Total : 1,905.95 10711. 12/26/2005.001-199"NOLL, JANINE 12182006 REFUND REQUEST 175 00 10712 12126/2006000058 OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE, ASSOCIATE 1282006 10713 10714 10715 10716 10717 10718 10719 12/2612006 000036 OFFICE DEPOT CREDIT PLAN 12/26/2006 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 112126/20G6.000512 OFFICETEAM 1212612006 001200 OXARC FIRE 12/2612006 001204 POWELL, DOUGLAS 12192006 366542962-001 36672601:-001': 366813044001 12126/2006 000494' PRO PEOPLE STAFFING SERV INC. 12/26/2006 001161 PROVISIONAL STAFFING SERVICES 17372057 17383380 17387361 12192006 12202006 18,560 3008-0500014048 Total : 175.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT TESTING 101.00 Total : 101.00 ACCT. NO.# 6011565610072627 798.69 Total : 798.69 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139.84 41421-`--"`•`•`''f'. OFFICE'SUPPLIES`FOR`SUE-f"!'''''"`''"' 41422 EASEL 53.25 Total : 23641 SERVICES FOR ANGELA FINCH 660.00 SERVICES FOR LANCE PECHT 604.80 SERVICES FOR KIMBERLY WILLIAI 660.00 Total : 1,924.80 REFUND REQUEST 100.00 Total : 100.00 REIMBURSEMENT 170.00 Tota l : 170.00 SERVICES FOR CENTERPLACE 1,167.97 Total : 1,167.97 SERVICES FOR MATT KUSHNER 920.88 Total : 920.88 vchlist - 1.v0L._a&.List j .-age: 5 12!2612006 9:19:08AM Spokane•Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Descrilition/Accotint•• Amount 10720 1212612006 000019 PURRFECT LOGOS, INC. 17712 41429 -OPERATING SUPPLIES 99.91 Total : 99.91 10721 12/2612006 000601 RERC 12182000" MEMBER SHIP FOR GREG MCCOR 75.00 10722 10723 10724 10725 10726 Total : 75.00 12/2612006 001186 SCHOONOVER, KIM 122120136 REFUND REQUEST 24.00 Total : 24.00 12/26/2006 000935 SERVICE PAPER COMPANY 30388079 41429 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 575.63 Total : 575.63 12126/2006 001207 SLAZINIK, COURTNEY 12212006 REFUND.REQUEST. 25.00 1212612006 000230 SPOKANE CNTY AUDITORS OFC, RECO 12182006 12/26/2006 000172 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER viy0610 VIy0610 10727 12/26/2006 000424 SPOKANE COUNTY UTILITES, STORMW csv2006-406 . 10728 1212612008 000324 SPOKANE COUNTY WATER DIST. #3 12222006 10729 12/2612006 001159 SPOKANE PUMP INC. 0180012 10730 12/2612006 001083 STANDARD PLUMBING HEATING;'CONT 22685 10731 1212612008 000773 STUDIO CASCADE, INC. 1122 - Total : 25.00 RECORDING FEES 811.00 Total : 811.00 MONTHLY INVOICE-OCT. 9, 2006 92,383.87 40937 PINES/MANSFIELO MOU WITH COL 19,828.10 40937 Total : 112,211.97 STORMWATER DECANT 392.87 Total : 392.87 WATER BILLING DATE 12/15/2006 567.30 Total : 567.30 41354 QUOTE #0025-06 'PUMP- REPAIR SF 7,593.57 Total 7,593.57 PUMP FOR.CENTERPLACE 541.91 Total : 541.91 PLANNING SERVICES 3,740.00• Total : 3,740.00 Page: 5 vchlist . Voucher List Page: 6 1212612006 -9:19:08AM . Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank , Voucher . Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 10732 12/26/2006 001206 SWANSON'S REFRIGERATION RES' V 19215 KITCHEN MAINTENANCE-FOR CEN. 226.74 Total : 226.74 10733 12/26/2006 000576 THOMSON WEST 812721432 20137 WA COURT RULES STATE, FE 122.72 Total 122.72 10734 12126/2006 001024 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST 61483867-001 41305 UNITED RENTAL OPEN FOR MISC. 7.33 Total : 7.33' 10735 12/2612006 000167 VERA WATER & POWER 12192006 BILLING DATE 12112-1211412006 207.96 1222006 BILLING DATES_ 12/14-1212012006 297.92 Total : 505.90 10736 12/2612006 000980 WESTERN SYSTEMS 10001431 41249 QUOTE #0007-06 PTR SIGN 2,780.16 Total : 2,780.16 60 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 301,499.14 60 Vouchers in this-report - APPROVED: I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have. been fumished,: the.services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein . and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and-that I am authorized to authenticate and certify to said claim. Finance Director Date Ken Thompson, Finance Director Mayor Wijhite Total vouchers : 301,499.14 Date Pafle: 6 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 01-09-07 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: x consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Payroll for Period Ending December 15, 2006 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: r_`, OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Gross: $ 145,642.08 Benefits: $ 15,750.08 TOTAL PAYROLL: $ 161,392.16 STAFF CONTACT: Jason Faulkner ATTACHMENTS J CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 01-09-07 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: x consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Payroll for Period Ending December 31, 2006 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Gross: $ 144,748.72 Benefits: $ 74,872.22_ TOTAL PAYROLL: $ 219,620.94 STAFF CONTACT: Jason Faulkner ATTACHMENTS 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 01-09-07 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE:. Ratify January 2, 2007 City Hall Closure BACKGROUND: On December 28, 2006, by Executive Order, President George W. Bush declared that all executive departments, independent organizations and other agencies of the Federal government shall be closed on Tuesday, :January 2, 2007, as a mark of respect for Gerald R. Ford, the 3 $°i President of the United States. .,or issued an announcement that President Bush declared January 2, 2007 as a Deputy City Manager Reg National.Day of Mourning and as a result, we would close our City Hall that day, and that there would be no Council meeting that evening. t OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to ratify the decision to close City Hall January 2, 2007, in observance of a day of mourning for former President Gerald R. Ford. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: ATTACHMENTS DRAFT AfM TES City of Spokane Valley City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, December 1-2, 2006 Mayor Wilhite called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m., and welcomed everyone to the 106'' meeting. Attendance: Diana Wilhite, Mayor Steve Taylor, Deputy Mayor Mike DeVleming, Councilmember Dick Denenny, Councilmembcr Bill Gothmann, Councilmember Rich Munson. Councilmember Gary Schimmels, Councilmember City Staff. Davd Mercier, City Manager Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager Mike Connelly, City Attorney Ken Thompson, Finance Director Mike Jackson, Parks & Rec Director Greg McCormick, Planning Manager Neil Kersten, Public Works Director Cary DriskelI, Deputy City Attorney Scott Kuhta, Senior Planner Greg Bingaman, IT Specialist Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk INVOCATION: Councilmember Munson gave the invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGLANCE: Mayor Wilhite led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL. CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called roll; all councilmembers were present. APPROVAL OF AGF\'nA: It was roved by Deputy rlfayor Taylor, seconded and unanimously passed to approve the agenda. - INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: None. COMATITTEE, BOARD, LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS: ` Councilmember Schimmels: spoke of the Spokane Valley Arts Council meeting he attended about a month ago. Councilmember Denenny: reported that he attended last week's Health Board meeting and that the board is doing well with their transition; and that he represented the Mayor by attending a reception for Critical Lodging, a company moving here.from California. Depuh' Mayor Taylor: mentioned that he attended a tour this morning of formal housing projects in Spokane Valley hosted by the Spokane Low Income Consortium; Councilmember Gothmann: stated that lie also attended the Flealth Board meeting where the board members were updated on different health concerns in the community; that he also attended the National League of Cities (NLC) conference in Reno, and of special interest was a session on seniors and how they are becoming an increasingly large segment of our community, and he mentioned it would be a great idea to pursue the development of an advisory group to provide the city with information or comments relative to the senior population. Councilmember Munson: reported that he also attended the NLC where he attended a workshop on re- tracking and*how to apply some of those concepts to our building codes or if they are applicable and workable; that he met today with the Spokane Transit Authority which discussed budget, adding that they anticipate a 4% increase in sales tax for neat year. Council Meeting: 12-12-06 Pale 1- of 7 Approved by Council: DRAFT MAYOR'S REPORT: Mayor Wilhite reported that she attended the celebration of Spokane's 125 h birthday; she chaired her last meeting as Chair of the NE Mayor's Association; she also attended the NL:C convention in Reno; and this afternoon she graveled to Central Valley High School to join Washington's Governor as she made an announcement on initiating programs of math and science, and of her intent to work toward amending the Washington State Constitution to allow school bonds to pass with a simple majority. PUBLIC COM-MENTS: Gail Stiltner, 10119 E 44`s Avenue: remarked that she wanted to share a viewpoint; that concerning the survey work started on 440' Ave in Ponderosa regarding a bike and walkway, that many residents were aware something was going to happen but not aware of exactly what or when; and when surveyors started their work interest mounted throughout the community and questions were raised; that she expressed thanks to Mr. Worley and Mr. Stamatoplos for their help, but she would like the City to be mindful of how important these projects are to the area residents and how the projects will affect them; like the need for it road in and out of the community and that it is more important than a walkway. She stated that she realizes citizen input will be taken but fears it may be given at a time too late and she would rather citizen input be placed in the forefront of the planning process, and would like to see such a procedure put in place. 1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. A Councilmember may remove an item from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. a. Following Claim Vouchers: VOUCHER LIST DATE VOUCHER #s TOTAL VOUCHER A 4OUNTT 11-30-2006 10473-10474; 10486-10549 284 067.23 11-30-2006 104184-10485 1480 823.20 GRAND TO'1"A1. 1,764 890.43 b. Payroll for Period Ending November 30, 2006: $216,977.46 c. Minutes of November 28, 2006 Council Regular Meeting .Il was moved by Deputy AfeVor Taylor, seconded and unanimously ggreed to approve the consent agenda. NEW BUSK TESS _ 2. Second Reading Ordinance 06-028 Amending 2006 Budeet -Ken Thomason After City Clerk read the ordinance title, it uvas proved by Deputy Mayor Taylor and seconded to approve Ordinance 06-025 amending the 2006.budget. Finance Director Thompson went through his Power-Point presentation explaining the proposed changes in revenue and resulting budget adjustments; and added that there have been no changes since the ordinance's first reading. Mayor Wilhite invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. .Abstentions: None, tlfotion carried 3. Second 1teadin Proposed Ordinance 06-029 Amending SVMC 2.50 -Nina Regor After City Clerk read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Taylor and seconded, to approve Ordinance 06-029. Deputy City Manager Regor explained that at previous meetings, staff proposed some potential updates to the Code and this ordinance incorporates those changes; e.g. adding sections to address nepotism, conflict of interest, and violence in the workplace; adding that the only change to the ordinance since the first reading is to correct a scrivener's error. Mayor Wilhite invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor.: Unanimous. Opposed.: None. Abstentions: Alone. Molion carried. Council Meeting: 12-12-06 Page 2 of 7 Approved by Council: DRAFT 4. Proposed Resolution 06-025 Replacing 03-015 --Nina Regor After City Clerk Bainbridge read the resolution title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Taylor and seconded to approve Resolution 06-025. Deputy City Manager Regor explained that this resolution would replace resolution 03-015 which identified insurance plans that the city wanted to offer, and includes a new proposal to add the option of a premium only plan, which would allow the employee or Council member to pay their share of the premium costs using pre-tax income. Brief discussion included the mention that not all councilmembers elect to participate in the medical plan; and that the first new paragraph under section l speaks to employees and not councilmembers, Mayor Wilhite invited public comment. \b comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Fcn~or: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: .None. Motion carried. 5. Proposed Resolution 06-026 Replacing 04-020 -Nina Regor After City Clerk Bainbridge read the resolution title, it was moved by Deputy Taylor and seconded to approve resolution 06-026. Deputy City Manager Regor noted that all proposed changes are housekeeping in nature, but do represent more changes than were seen in September, specifically section 3 concerning sick leave. Ms. Regor explained that rather than list the uses of sick leave, the state regulations of RCW 49.12 and WAC 296-130 are referenced. Mayor Wilhite invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed, None. Abstentions: None. .Motion carried. 6. Motion Consideration: Urban Growth Area (UGA) Defined - Scott Kuhta it was moved by Deputy Mayor Taylor and seconded to request the City of Spokane Valley Urban Growth Areas as recommended by the Spokane Valley Planning Commission including the following additional properties or areas (as displayed on the map entitled "City Council UGA Analysis'): CCR-1, i CCR-2a; CCR-2b; and CCR-3. Senior Planner Kuhta explained the process and discussed the various potential UGAs as shown on the "City Council UGA Analysis" map. Mr. Kuhta also made reference to a letter from Kim A. McGogney- Linke requesting a revision of parcels situaied at 17811 32"d Avenue, close to the Morning Side Development; requesting a change from their current status or Urban Reserve, to Urban Growth. Mr. Kuhta said that the area is in the urban reserve area but outside our UGA. Discussion followed on population allocations and areas; preserving the natural state of the Ponderosa area; zoning designations and mention that we do not have a comparable zone to "rural conversation" as Mr. Kuhta explained if the property is to remain rural, it should remain in the County. Mayor Wilhite invited public comment. PUBLIC CONCMENT: Stacy Bjordahl, 422 W Riverside, Spokane: said she speaks on behalf of four different property owners: Bud Morrison, Jack Kestell, Ken Tupper, and Viktor Sizov, and said that letters have been submitted regarding those properties; that regarding the assumption of density in particular the low density residential zone; she stated that the land capacity analysis assumes, develop ina at four units per acre; that in the public hearings held last year, the number one complaint was that four units per acre is too dense; and that developers are trying to go to the maximum in order to have lots available to build and sell; and she asks that Council go back and look at the assumption, especially on city lots where there Nvill be infill development, to see if four units per development acre is realistic on a one-acre lot; and that maybe two to three per acre would be more appropriate, realistic and more consistent with how environment is developed here. She added that there is a case that says if you have a private covenant that restricts density or prohibits further lot development in terms of subdivision, it won't be developed; and that there are a lot of already developed existing lots in the Valley. She mentioned that regarding the specific areas that have been designated, a lot of those areas arc cases where the property owner did not request to be ` included in the UGA; and there are other property owners who have asked to be in the UGA and they are not in tonight's proposal; and that it would be inconsistent to think that the areas are being designated Council Meeting: 12-12-06 Page 3 of 7 Approved by Council: DRAf'•T without a request, that those areas will be developed; and if a property owner is really and willing to develop, they would make such a request to be part of the City's UGA, which has not been done; and that those areas include the areas of Plantes Perry, the NF rdgecliff area, Ponderosa, and some of the south east portions. Ms. Bjordahl mentioned that many areas proposed to be included are not consistent with the Growth Management Act, because the GNiA states when the area is designated, you first look to areas where there are services available, sewer lines in place and an area characterized by urban brrowth; and in particular in looking at Plantes Ferry, staffs report said that none of that area is sewered, yet that is an area to be included in the UGA. Coneurrency would also be a problem, she stated, and she feels the record does not support those areas being included in the UGA; and she asks that Council look at the assumptions and the specific requests submitted and to perhaps re-evaluate those areas. Mayor Wilhite invited further public comment; no other comments were offered. Councilmember Munson mentioned the importance of time and that there must be forward movement or we could be in violation of the CTED rules and possibly lose some C1`I;D funding; and he prefers to go with staff's recommendations. Councilmember Gothmann added that he has a concern with the CCR-3 area and that Cities are not allowed to designate Waal areas; and that particular area needs to be a conservation area and is exactly the same area as the Dishman Hills conservation area, and that he proposes to exclude CCR3 from this consideration. Deputy Mayor Taylor asked Mr. Kuhta what the Planning Commission considered and what was their process in terms of individual requests to be included in the UGA. Mr. Ku}ata explained that all letters were forwarded to the Planning Commission; that the County also received requests and input; and all that information was given to the Planning Commission which resulted in staff forming a boundary that tried to incorporate as many requests as reasonable; keeping in mind the need to accommodate 33,000 citizens; and that afterwards the Planning Commission made their recommendation. Mr. Kuhta explained that forwarding this boundary is not the end of the process, as a full capital facilities analysis must be completed which might show that areas need to be revised; that this will go forward through our Comp Plan Amendment process with a full capital facilities plan amendment as well. In response to questions about what is considered when evaluating these requests, Mr. Kuhta added that transportation impacts must be considered, and that there. are currently levels of service problems at Sullivan and Pines; that there is currently a large UGA on the southeast area; that this boundary and the capital facilities analysis must also go before the Spokane Regional Transportation Council, which will send us some modeling reports, and if the impacts are not severe, it might be appropriate to add more land if needed. Councilmember Munson asked regarding the CCR2b area, if the cities of Liberty Lake and Spokane Valley both ask for that area, what type of conflict resolution can be expected. Mr. Kuhta said if council recommends asking for that CCR2b area, discussions should be held with Liberty Lake giving them our reasons why we are requesting this area, and the decision ultimately goes to the County as arbitrator, and the County could designate it for growth for Liberty Lake, or for Spokane Valley, or a three-way joint planning area. In response to a question concerning how the units per acre are calculated, Planning Manager McCormick explained that it refers to the assumption that low density residential would be four units per acre; and that that is the regional methodology to do land analysis and not something as a result of a court case or staff recommendation, but is a regional methodology that every city within the County, and the County also, calculates land capacity; but that we are not proposing a minimum density of any zoning we are developing; and the current zoning densities are maximum designations. Senior Planner Kuhta added that staff will forward copies of Planning Commission minutes, as well as citizen's letters, to council concerning this issue. Mayor Wilhite expressed her view that concerning the CCR3 area, she said there is not a lot of good developable land there although there is some development there, but her concern is that the Ponderosa Council Meeting: 12-12-06 Page 4 of 7 Approved by Council: DRAFT has been looking at an access road and feels that would occur quicker if the area were under the City's control; and that those citizens would be under our police response time rather than the County's as the citizens would likely feel that would be beneficial; and that she does not want to see this land developed as high density but does see a need for the area to be included in the city limits to address development issues. Councilmember Gothmann asked if it would be possible to designate that area, or part of that area as an urban conservation area. Mr. Kuhta said that would be possible through a comp plan amendment and creating a new category for this one specific piece of ground. Deputy Mayor Taylor said that he feels there would be more pressure to develop that area to a non-rural standard if it was within our UGA; whereas if it remains in County rural conservation there would be less pressure to do so. Councilmember Denenny questioned why we would be bringing in something that does not add to an area that would accommodate population; but rather cooperation by joint planning might better fulfill the needs of the area. City Attorney Connelly said that the recommendation we are sending to the Steering Committee is urban gowth areas, which are designated as areas where urban growth is expected to occur; so urban conservation areas is a different topic; and if Council would like to build a road or protect an area, there are other avenues to work toward those pursuits. Deputy Mayor Taylor said he would like to amend his motion (friendly amendment) to remove the CCR3 area; seconder accepted that friendly amendment. City Clerk Bainbridge reiterated the new motion: to request the City of .Spnkone Valley Urban Growth Areas as recommended by the Spokane Pulley Planning Con?rnission including the following additional properties or areas (as displayed on the map entitled "City Council UGA Analysis'): CC,R-1, CCR-2a; CCR-2b. Councilmember DeVleming added that he would still like to review the relevant letters and the specific portions of the Planning Commission minutes that address this issue. Discussion ensued concerning the process. City Attorney Connelly stated ~J that the timing of the recommendation is not clear and we will need further direction from the County; although it appeared the Steering Committee wanted those recommendations immediately, before formally arending our comprehensive plan. Mr. Kuhui further explained that the final process should include us amending our comprehensive plan to include those areas, which would then be forwarded through with the County making the final determination. Mr. Kuhta also explained that the bi-frication part of this action is that the County is trying to get all of their comp plan updated, including UGAs in their five-year update; they split-off the UGA discussion from the rest of the comp plan amendments which is mostly text amendments and some land use changes within the existing UGA; so the County has taken this UGA process and will be moving it forward through 2007; and that is where we get to this discussion of timing, and what goes first, and he hopes the meeting this week will answer those questions. Mr. Connelly explained that if council desired, we could wait a week until we have more information, and include this matter on next week's agenda. After council discussion, Deputy Mayor "Taylor withdrew his motion and the seconder accepted. City Manager Mercier said that the additional information for council would include copies of letters received from property owners and presented to the Planning Commission. Iv r. Connelly added that prior to staff drafting a facilities analysis, first specific UGA's must be selected, then staff can do their analysis on those WAS for further presentation to Council. Mr. Mercier also added that because we require modeling information from SRTC, we are looking at a two or three month process to come back with this information, but can provide council with copies of letters for next week's council meeting. Mayor Wilhite said that council will ruminate this issue until the next council meeting, which will also give councilmembers an opportunity to further think about these areas; and hope to hear about the outcome from the steering committee meeting. Deputy Mayor Taylor reiterated the need for all councilmembers to do careful analysis of letters and whatever other documents necessary to help make a determination. Council Meeting: 12-12-06 Page 5 of 7 Approved by Council: DRAY F Mayor Wilhite called for a recess at 7:25 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 7:35 p.m. 7. Motion Consideration: A.ppleway Corridor- Dave Mercier/Mike Connelly City Attorney Connelly explained that by letter dated November 15, 2006, the City recently asked the County to acknowledge the City's ownership of the proposed Appleway extension; and by Spokane County's letter dated December 5, 2006, they refused to do so. Mr. Connelly said that the position of Spokane County appears to be that this dedicated road, as opposed to other roadways within the City of Spokane Valley, did not revert to the City upon incorporation; and that it is the City's position that the roadway did revert upon incorporation; and that it is clear that the failure to resolve this dispute could adversely impact pending $4 million dollars in federal funds on that road's improvement, and of the development of the City Center, which is at least in part adjacent to the roadway in question. The options before Council, Mr. Connelly explained are to (1) authorize the initiation of a suit, (2) seek an agreement for mediation or arbitration, (3) continue negotiations, or (4) take no action. It was moved by Mayor Wilhite and seconded by Deputy Alcryor Taylor that we authorize the initiation of an action in Spokane County Superior Court to resolve existing disputes as to ownership of the proposed Appletivay Extension. Mayor Wilhite invited public comment. Tony Lazanis, 10626 E Empire: said he thinks we should go with the lawsuit; and take over the sewers too; that we have spent enough time on this and should own the sewers to benefit the Valley and the people. Vote by Acclamation after brief council discussion: Li favor: Unanimous. Opposer!: None. Abstentions: drone. Motion carried. 3. Motion Consideration: L odgina Tax Grant Allocations - DepUly Ma yo} r Taylor It was moved by Deputy Mayor Taylor and .seconded, to allocate the fithding recommendations as listed: Spokane County Fair & .Frpo Center $20, 000; Spokane Regional Convention/Visitor's Bureau ,S17S, 000; Spokane Regional Sports Commission $100,000; Spokane Valley heritage Wuseran $10,000; Vallelfest $25, 000; Six .Brielges Arts Association ,512, 500; and CenteYPlace $40, 000. Mayor Wilhite invited public comment. Tony Lazanis: said he would like the City to keep S 150,000 to put up a tourism facility around the mall; that it could be a*small building so tourists can have coffee, and that we use that money much wiser than we are doing now. After brief council discussion concerning the idea of additional proposals in the spring, and the reserves, Council voted by acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed.: Alone. Abstentions: None. Alotion carried 9. Ma orL al Appointments: Committees. Planning Commission - Mayor Wilhite Mayor Wilhite explained that there are several committees and commissions which have members whose terms expire the end.of the year; and that the openings on the Planning Commissioner were advertised, but no one other than the incumbents expressed a desire to be on that commission. Mayor Wilhite stated that she spoke with each councihnember and some are in the middle of situations and requested no change be made; but that she did make a proposed change to the Finance Committee, removing her name and adding Mr. DeVleming's; and likewise proposed changing the SR.TC (Spokane Regional Transportation Council), removing Mr. DeVleming's name and adding hers. It was moved by Councilmember Munson and seconded to approve the appointments to the various boards and committees as noted on the accompanying list, [which list is attached to the final approved minutes] which includes the Planning Commission appointments. Mayor Wilhite invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: [lone. Abstentions: None. Alotion carried PUBLIC CONIHNIFNITS. Mayor Wilhite invited general public comments. No comments were offered. ADMLNISTRATTVF REPORTS: 10. Dangerous Dog Appeal - Cary Driskell Deputy City Attorney Driskell gave a brief history and background on handling appeals concerning dangerous or potentially dangerous dogs; and that the Board of County Commissioners informed us that it Council Meeting: 12-12-06 Page 6 of 7 Approved by Council: b ORA- T will not handle such appeals in the future; and as a result, Council needs to determine how to administratively handle those future determinations. After Attorney Driskell explained, and Council discussed the four options (as per his December 5, 2006 memorandum), it was council consensus to choose the option that Council amend Spokane Valley Municipal Code 7.30.010 and .030 so that appeals go from SCRAPS (Nancy Hill) with review by the Hearing Examiner on behalf of the City; and that the decision by the Hearing Examiner would be final with any appeal taken directly to Superior Court. Mr. Driskell will prepare a draft ordinance for a future council meeting. 11. Uniform Development Code (UDC) Title 17, 18, and 20 - Greg McCormick Planning Manager McCormick went through his PowerPoint presentation explaining the general concepts and provisions contained in three Uniform Development Codes: Title 17- General Provisions; Title 18- Boards & Authorities; and Title 20 - Subdivisions. Discussion ensued regarding the Council's process of discussing these titles, with Councilmember DeVleming stating his preference to have more of a round- table type discussion of these issues. Councilmember Denenny asked if staff could identify which items are necessary as per state statutes and therefore would not be susceptible to change, and which sections are more flexible and open to change. Mr. Mercier remarked that while "Titles 19 and 22 will require more in-depth discussion as those contain the bulk of policy concerns, perhaps in dealing with these materials, Councilmembers can mark those items they -want conversation about, and send those comments to staff who can then gather all remarks into one document for further discussion; and as such, Mr. Mercier asked if Council would submit their materials (comments on titles 17, 18 and 20) to Chris Bainbridge in preparation for the January 2 meeting. Council concurred. There being no further business, it was proved by Cowicilmember DeVleming, seconded, and unanimously J agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 8:23 p.m. ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk i Diana Wilhite, Mayor Council Meeting: 12-12-06 Page 7 of 7 Approved by Council: DRAFT iI TINWES 0 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION Tuesday, December 19, 2006 Mayor Wilhite called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m., and welcomed everyone to the meeting. Present: Councilmembers: Staff: Diana Wilhite, Mayor Dave Mercier, City Manager Steve Taylor, Deputy Mayor Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager Mike DeVleming, Councilmember Mike Connelly, City Attorney Dick Denen.ny, Councilmember Neil Kersten, Public Works Director Bill Gothmann, Councilmember Mike Jackson, Parks & Rec Director Rich Munson, Councilmember Scott Kuhta, Senior Planner Gary Schimmels, Councilmember Greg McCormick, Planning Managef Carolbelle Branch, Public Information Officer Greg Bingaman,IT Specialist Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk 1. Mayoral Appointment: Spokane County Housing and Community Development Advisory Board - Mayor Wilhite Mayor Wilhite explained that these appointments are generally made during regular council meetings; however, this Board's work is accumulating and the vacancy needs to be filled now to give the new appointee ample opportunity to review documents associated with Community Development grants. Mayor Wilhite stated that she intends to appoint Rick Scott: to this vacancy; and asked fora motion to confirm that appointment. It was moved by Councilmember Cothmann, seconded, and unonimously agreed to confirm the Mayor's appointment of Rick Scott to the Spokane County Housing and C'onunienity Development Advisory Board. Rick Scott was in attendance and thanked Councilmembers for their trust in him in making this appointment. 2. Economic Development Council (EDC) 2006 Third Ouarter R.eoort - Jim Huttenmaier Partner Relations Director Jim Huttetnmaier thanked Council for the opportunity to present the EDC's 2006 Third Quarter report, and then introduced Pat Smith, Manager of Health Care Resources group, a company the EDC assisted moving into the Pinecroft Business Park; and also introduced Robin 'l'oth, EDC Director of Funding and Community Projects. Ms. Smith theft gave a history of her company and how it originated in Sandpoint, Idaho, of their decision to open an office here in the Valley and 41 several other states, of how it has grown, and of her appreciation of the ]:DC's assistance. Mr. Huttenmaier then spoke of the Third Quarter 2006 Key results, followed by remarks from Ms. Toth of the work force and integration of the EDC and the Spokane Chamber. Council extended their thanks for the update. 3. Parks 2007 Capital Program - Mike Jackson Parks and Recreation Director Jackson explained that in working within the 2007 Parks Capital Projects Budget, staff developed a list of recommended projects, which projects also follow the general recommendations of the Parks and Recreation MasterPlan adopted last April. Via his PowerPoint presentation, Mr. Jackson explained that staff recommends the top three priorities as upgrading the existing park facilities, making aquatic improvements, and acquiring land. City Manager Mercier added that the governor's budget was released today and in it, the Governor plans $70 million in funding for IAC type projects, which is the entity that finds many of the park and recreation acquisition requests that go before the state; that we filed an application and we were ranked In out of 69 projects; and that we anticipate receiving verification of funding by the end of next week. Meeting ,Minutes: 12-19-06 Page 1 of it Approved by Council: DR4ET Mr. Jackson mentioned that some of the project funding would be from REET, and he can provide those figures later to Council. Council/staff discussion included the need for security lights; neighborhood parks and areas that have a school within a half.-mail radius; that the Greenacres area is the highest priority in the plans for a neighborhood park; parking in iMirabeau and mention that a property owner in the area is considering building a restaurant in that location which might lead to an opportunity to work with them for parking; that staff plans to apply for grant funds to develop the park in 2008; how these projects fit in with each department's and the City's overall business plan; the public's desire for facility improvements, and that Parks and Rec staff will follow the Parks and Recreation Masterplan as their business plan for park development as they put the projects together. 4. Proposed Urban GroNvth Area Defined - Scott Kuhut and Gn,,, McCormick Senior Planner Kuhta mentioned that at the last council meeting during council's review of some new information, Council asked that staff provide Council with copies of all citizen letters received by the Planning Commission along with the Planning Commission relevant meeting minutes; and that the minutes were distributed separately tonight; but the letters are contained in tonight's council packet. It was also mentioned that Mr. McCormick attended last week's Planning Directors' Meeting to discuss the process to get the urban growth update finalised and through the County's process, and that another meeting is set for this Thursday to further discuss the process with the hope of finalizing exactly how the UGA upgrades are accomplished. In further regard to process, Mr. Kulhta stated that the development of the capital facilities analysis would be based on the map the Planning Commission recommended, including some of the areas Council asked staff to add, and if additional lands should be considered; staff would need to know that as well; and that this would move forward through the Comprehensive Plan amendment process and then through the County; adding that the County is not pushing an end-of the- year deadline, and staff is also not now trying to finalize this by the end of this year. Councilmember DeVleming asked staff to indicate which citizen letters were approved or denied with a brief explanation of the reason for such decision; and Deputy Mayor Taylor asked that staff prepare a map showing where we are with our current proposed areas. Further discussion included the Painted Hills Area; the southeast portion of Morningside area; areas on the northeast; how far on the Forker area; and that these items need to be discussed with the rationale and guidance from staff on why or why not to include what areas. Mr. Kuhta mentioned that some of the areas are ones which we think Spokane Valley would grow into and be annexed over the years; but we will need to look at how such annexation would benefit our city, in addition to looking at growth which occurs outside out city but impacts our city; and mentioned that we will look at those parcels and boundaries as we all move deeper into the process next year. Mr. Kuhta added that a plan should be devised within another few months. Mayor Wilhite called for a. recess 7:10 p.m., and reconvened the meeting at 7:24 p.m. 5. Street MasterPlan Update - Neil Kersten Public Works Director Kersten explained that Council previously expressed their desire to have a well- defined Street MasterPlan along with finding options, that identifies the current condition of the City streets and also recommends appropriate improvements and maintenance that would preserve the value and structural integrity of the local transportation system; and that J-U-B Engineers was selected as the most qualified consultant for this project. Mr. Kersten then introduced J-U-B representatives David Kliever, Area Manager for the Spokane Office; Chuck Larson, Corporate Tnuisportation Manager; and Spencer Montgomery, Transportation Planner. The gentlemen from J-U-B went through two PowerPoint presentations explaining various aspects of the Pavement Management Program, including its purpose, program benefits, software requirements, pavement management program components, pavement condition (including the Pavement Condition Map of 2006), budget scenarios and results, and the next steps utcluding evaluating different construction techniques, evaluating maintenance/capital improvement costs, drafting an annual maintenance and capital budget, and the draft six-year plan. The second PowerPoint, Phase 2 Transportation Planning, also highlighted the purpose of the planning and the Nleeting Minutes: 12-14-06 Page 2 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT primary and secondary data needs, followed by a flow-chart showing the entire Transportation Improvement Program Preparation Process. Mr. Mercier stated in reference to the map showing the graphical rendition of the current condition of our pavements, that this map would point out the need to have another map developed which would suggest what the condition statement would be at the end of the sewering program since sewering is not included on the map, and to also look at the chart on the deterioration curve and to give us a post-severing glimpse that way, as that may not have been one of the variables cross tabulated previously. J-U-B representatives responded that one of the positive attributes of the program is that staff' can give them all the "what-ifs" and they will tell us what they will do; and he mentioned that they arc on top of the sewering issue and that will be one of the evaluation components on how they move forward with a five-year pavement maintenance plan, showing what roadways will get done as part of that. Councilmember DeVleming added that he would like to have this system include a function that would allow citizens to enter their address on the system and see exactly what their street's condition is and the planned maintenance for the street; or any connecting street:. J-U-B representative said this software would be able to include that option; and to be effective, this system would need to be managed annually, and that each year we would re-inventory about one-fifth of the roadways and re-run the five-year plan; so that every five years we will have inventoried and inspected every roadway and kept that data updated. Mr. Mercier asked if any other jurisdiction of significant size in our area has anything equivalent to this program; and the response was no; although there are some on the vest side such as in Bellevue, Auburn, Kitsap County; and for a community our size, J-U-B representative said he doesn't know how anyone could effectively manage a roadway system without such a program. J-U-B representative added that currently more than 55% of our roads are in "very good" condition, adding that their schedule for completion of the plan is within the next four to sic months. 0 in reference to the Pavement Management Program "Scenario Results" showing the $1.5 budget and the budget baseline of 72.6, Mr. Mercier said a scenario he would like to see would be what is the amount of increased spending or investment required to maintain that current baseline at 72.6; and to therefore have at least one scenario that doesn't show the bar below the baseline. Mr. Kersten stated that these budget Figures arc very preliminary and the scenarios do not include the severing projects. Mr. Mercier added that his comment was intended not to focus on the $1.5 but to understand that the trend line would require an increasing amount each year to maintain the same level of condition. Mr. Mercier mentioned that should J-U-B consultants come back and state that the recommended baseline should be 79 or 82, or whatever figure, we would need to have information about the cost of the delta between that and the 72.6 as well as the value ratio; so that if the baseline is stepped up, not only will that increase cost "x" but will likely sieve cost "y." Mr. Montgomery explained that the Phase 2 program, which has an ultimate goal to help staff prepare the annual Transportation Improvement Program with better tools, and to therefore make better city infrastructure. Mr. Mercier asked that if in Mr. Montgomery's experience for a community of our size with the configuration of our transportation system, do you typically run this analysis solely on intersection level of service or do you perform a corridor analysis as well? Mr. Montgomery responded that typically one would start at the uitersection then begin to see corridor projects that can be identified. Mr. Larson added that a lot of the level of service analysis done here was done by our staff with the synro-model in a corridor setting where practical. Mr. Larson added that prior to the open house for the public, likely to be held in March or April, that they will attempt to have the maps placed on our website for public viewing. Meeting Minutes: 12-19-06 Nge 3 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT 6. Advance Agenda Additions - Mayor Wilhite Mayor Wilhite asked if there were changes to the Advance Agenda, and mentioned the Tentative 2007 Calendar, adding that this year at a glance will give Councilmembers dates to consider when planning time away from City Hall, and that the 2007 calendar also lists the 2007 AWC and rLC conferences. 7. In orniation Only: Fiber Internet Service for Centerl'lace: Information only, no discussion or report. 8. Council Check-in - Mayor Wilhite Mayor Wilhite mentioned a tentative date of January 18 for a Conversation with the Community, but said she hesitates to firmly schedule such as attendance has been very low in the past; but that last week a constituent approached her about issues of interest in the Ponderosa area. Taking into consideration Deputy Mayor Taylor's Thursday class schedule, she will work with councilmembers for a mutually agreeable date. Councilmembers also mentioned the upcoming legislative conference in Olympia and the desire to coordinate travel arrangements. Mayor Wilhite mentioned the opening on the Cable Advisory Board with a December 29 application deadline, and she stated that any assistance in applicant recommendations would be appreciated. 9. Ci Manager Comments - Dave Mercier Regarding the vacant City Police Chief position, City Manager Mercier reported and he and Deputy City Manager Regor attended a series of meetings with the Sheriff's Office in an effort to negotiate enhancements in the selection process and clarify understandings of rights, roles and responsibilities; that a series of proposals were made to the Sheriff's Office to alter the recruitment process, including the possibility of broad based advertising so to be appraised of all interested candidates, or to include the position as a City Employee; but that those alternates were not embraced by the Sheriff's Office; and that a letter was received from the Sheriff's Office containing three names for Police Chief consideration, but an initial review suggests there may be a need to have one or two replacement. names; as Mr. Mercier mentioned he contacted two of those on the list and one is going to retire at the end of February and is therefore no longer a candidate; and that another candidate apparently did not meet all the academic attributes provided in the draft job description. Mr. Mercier said that the Sheriff is out of the area until after the first of the year, but was informed by the Under Sheriff that the Sheriff's Office will recompose a list of names for Police Chief Consideration. Mr. Mercier further explained that questions have arisen concerning who has authority to remove the chief of police; that the current provisions of the RCWs list the City Manager with appointment and removal authority; so there is a need for our attorneys to meet with the Board of County Commissioner's attorneys to discuss several phrases in the contract and any other contract issues such as one sheriff binding another sheriff to ongoing contracts. Mr. Mercier said attempts are ongoing to get everyone in a meeting to discuss unresolved issues; and that Mr. Mercier looks to have those issues clarified and to secure a list of names of several interested candidates. Council/staff discussion included autonomy of the City in securing a candidate to fill t: he position; selection, retention and removal issues; and that contracts are generally entered into when beneficial to all parties. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m. ATTES` : Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Diana Wilhite, Mayor Meeting Minutes: 12-19-06 Page 4 of 4 Approved by Council: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 9, 2007. City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business 0 new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ® pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First Reading Ordinance 07-001 Extending URA Zone GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35A.63.220, Spokane Valley Ordinance 05-025 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Ordinance No. 06-019 extending the Interim Zoning for an additional six months to coincide with the adoption of Spokane Valley Development Regulations. BACKGROUND: An interim zoning ordinance may be renewed for one or more six-month periods if a public hearing is held and findings of fact are made prior to each renewal. The purpose of interim zoning is to maintain a status quo. The UR-1 interim zoning does not impose a moratorium on construction, but does restrict further subdivision of land within the Ponderosa ~I and Rotchford neighborhoods. The Interim UR-1 Urban Residential Estate Zoning was originally effective on September 8, 2004. A third renewal of six months was authorized until March 6, 2007. The updated work plan had anticipated completion of development regulations, design guidelines and performance standards implementing the Spokane Valley 2006-2026 Comprehensive Plan prior to this date. The completion of development regulations is not expected to be complete until March 31, 2007, with actual rezoning with notice to affected property owners within six months thereafter. It is anticipated that the development regulations will provide for an "R-1 - Residential Estate Zoning District", with the same or similar provisions as those of the interim UR-1 district. The City has received a single objection to continuance of the interim zoning regulation. The objection centered on the minimum 40,000 square foot requirement for new lots. OPTIONS: Approve the extension following a public hearing, deny the extension. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: "I move to advance ordinance 07-001 authorizing the fourth extension of the Interim UR-1 Residential Estate zoning in the Ponderosa and Rotchford neighborhoods, to a second reading." BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Not applicable. STAFF CONTACT: Marina Sukup, Community Development Director ATTACHMENTS: i Draft ordinance, Findings of Fact, Amended Workplan DRAFT C CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 07-001 AN ORDINANCE OF TAE CITY OF SPOKAN- VALLEY, WASHINGTON, EXTENDII14G THE URBAN RESIDENTIAL ESTATE (UR-1) INTERIM ZONING AUTHORIZED BY ORDINANCE No. 04-035 FOR AN ADDITIONAL. SIX MONTUS BEYOND THE THIRD EXTENSION APPROVED BY ORDINANCE No. 06-01.9 IN THE PONDEROSA AND ROTCHFORD AREAS; AND AIMENDiNG THE FINDINGS OF FACT AND WORKPLAN. 0 WHEREAS, The Growth Management Act provides that all zoning regulations be consistent with an adopted Comprehensive Plan (RCW 35A.63.105); and RrhIEREAS, RCW 35A.63.220 provides for establishment of interim zoning for up to one year following a public hearing where a Work plan is developed for related studies; and WHEREAS, the interim zoning may be extended for one or more six-month periods if a subsequent public hearing is held and findings of fact are made prior to each renewal; and NVHEREAS, the Spokane Valley Development Regulations will be finalized on or before March 31, 2007; and WHEREAS, the neighborhoods desire to continue the Interim Zoning until such time as full analysis has been completed; and WI-IEREAS, following a public hearing and the adoption of Findings and a revised Workpla n, Ordinance No. 06-001 extended the interim zoning for a period of six months until September 6, 2006, and Ordinance No. 06-019 further extended the provisions until March 6, 2007; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on January 9, 2007 and approved revised the Findings of Fact and Workplan. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Washington, ordains as follows: Section I. The Interim Urban Residential Estate (UR-1) Zoning is hereby extended for an additional six month period until September 6, 2007 within the original boundaries and subject to the regulations set forth in Spokane Valley Ordinance No. 04-035. Section 2.. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 4. Effective [date This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof occurs in the official newspaper of the City as provided by law. Ordinance 07-001 Ext UR-I Page 1 oft DRAFT PASSED by the City Council this day of January, 2007. Mayor, Diana Wilhite ATTEST: City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: f?ffective Date: - Ordinance 07-001 Lxt UR-1. Page 2 of 2 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (711 ne FINDINGS OF FACT REVISED JANUARY 1, 2007 16&Y FOURTH EXTENSION OF INTERIM URBAN RESIDENTIAL ESTATE (UR-1) ZONING FOR SIX MONTHS STAFF REPORT DATE: January 1, 2007 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: Extension of interim zoning controls to limit residential densities for a period of six months, and to continue practice of allowing the keeping of large animals on residential lots. PROPOSAL LOCATION: Portions of the Ponderosa and Rotchford residential subdivisions. PREPARED BY: Marina Sukup, AICP, Director, Spokane Valley Community Development Dept. 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION PROPERTY INFORMATION: Size & Ponderosa: Located adjacent to Browne's Mountain on the southern edge of Characteristics: the City, neighboring the Dishman Natural Area on the northwest and the Iller Conservation area on the south. Fully developed single-family residential lots generally exceeding one acre in size, served by local access and residential collectors. Limited access to municipal wastewater collection system. Terrain hilly with intermittent streams feeding Chester Creek. Portion of the subdivision located within the 100-year floodplain. Large stands of native Ponderosa pines. Abuts a closed landfill. Platted in phases between 1964 and 1992. Rotchford: Located on the eastern edge of the City. Fully developed single- family residential lots generally exceeding one acre in size, served by local access and residential collectors. No access to municipal wastewater collection system. Rolling terrain abutting steep hills with drainage into Saltese Creek. Saltese Creek is located within the 100-year floodplain. Platted in 1974. Both subdivisions were originally platted as residential subdivisions designed for the keeping of a limited number of horses. SURROUNDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & ZONING Subject Comprehensive Plan - Low Density Residential Properties Zoning - Interim UR-1 Residential Estate UR•1 Interim Zoning FINDINGS RevWed January 1, 2007 1 of 7 11. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The Spokane Valley 2006-2026 Comprehensive Plan provides the following guidance in relevant part: CHAPTER 2 LAND USE: Residential Goals & Policies Goal LUG-1 Preserve and protect the character of Spokane Valley's residential neighborhoods. Policies LUP-1.1 Maintain and protect the character of existing and future residential neighborhoods through the development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations and joint planning. LUP-1.2 Protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent non-residential uses and/or higher intensity uses through the development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations and joint planning. LUP-1.3 Review and revise as necessary, existing land use regulations to provide for innovation and flexibility in the design of new residential developments, accessory dwelling units and in-fill development. LUP-1.4 Encourage the development of transportation routes and facilities to serve residential neighborhoods. Special attention should be given to pedestrian circulation. LUP-1.5 Encourage the development of parks and the dedication of open space in and adjacent to residential areas. Open space dedication shall be proportionate to the size of the development. LUP-1.6 Preserve site characteristics that enhance residential development (trees, bodies of water, vistas, and similar features) using site planning techniques such as clustering, planned unit developments, transfer of development rights and lot size averaging. LUP-1.7 Allow zone changes within the Low Density Residential category only when specific criteria are met. Criteria may include: • Substantial changes within zone change area. • Clear mapping errors. • Adequate facilities and services (e.g. sewer, water capacity) • Consistency with densities in the vicinity of the zone change UR-1 Interim Zoning FINDINGS Revised January 1. 2007 2of7 CHAPTER 10 NEIGHBORHOODS: Goal NG-2 Preserve and protect the character of Spokane Valley's residential neighborhoods. Policies NP-2.1 Maintain and protect the character of existing and future residential neighborhoods through the development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations and joint planning. NP-22 Review and revise as necessary, existing land use regulations to provide for innovation and flexibility in the design of new residential developments, accessory dwelling units, and in-fill development. NP-2.3 Encourage the development of parks and the dedication of open space in and adjacent to residential areas. Open space dedication shall be proportionate to the size of the development. NP-2.4 Preserve site characteristics that enhance residential development (trees, bodies of water, vistas, and similar features) using site planning techniques such as clustering, planned unit developments, transfer of development rights, and lot size averaging. NP-2.5 Allow zone changes within the Low Density Residential category only when specific criteria are met. Criteria may include: • Substantial changes within zone change area. • Clear mapping errors. • Adequate facilities and services (e.g. sewer, water capacity). • Consistency with densities in the vicinity of the zone change. NP-2.6 Establish appropriate design guidelines with buffer zones and transition requirements to protect residential neighborhoods from incompatible land uses and adverse impacts associated with arterials, freeways and rail corridors. NP-2.7 Encourage rehabilitation and improvement programs to conserve and upgrade existing properties and buildings. NP-2.8 Encourage programs targeted at neighborhood preservation, including Weed and Seed, housing rehabilitation and crime prevention programs, such as Neighborhood Watch, McGruff Houses, etc. NP-2.9 Integrate retail developments into surrounding neighborhoods through attention to quality design and function. Encourage neighborhood retail and personal services to locate at appropriate sites where local economic demand and design solutions demonstrate compatibility with the neighborhood. NP-2.10 Develop guidelines and options for Neighborhood/sub-area associations which facilitate the refinement of Neighborhood/sub-area plans. UR-1 Interim Zoning FINDINGS Revised January 1, 2007 3of7 NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER: Ponderosa: Low density residential designed for on-premises maintenance of a limited number of horses. Heavily wooded with rugged terrain in parts. Expansion to the northwest precluded because of the Dishman Natural Area and terrain. Over 95% of lots fully developed. Some remain vacant because of topography. Rotchford: Low density residential designed for on-premises maintenance of a limited number of horses. Terrain is relatively flat east of Sullivan Road with steep hillside limiting any easterly expansion. Equine easements provided on local streets. Subdivision is fully developed. Social Character: Well-organized and cohesive neighborhoods. DESIGN QUALITY: Local access and residential collectors designed to accommodate lots of approximately one acre. Single-family housing is well-maintained and designed for residential privacy. A limited number of large animals, especially horses is a design theme in both neighborhoods. Although the Spokane Valley 2006-2026 Comprehensive Plan has been adopted, Spokane Valley has not finalized implementing regulations, performance or design standards to assure the quality of residential design to preserve neighborhood character pursuant to the Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY: Wastewater. Limited access to public sewer in the Ponderosa. Balance of property relies on septic systems. Rotchford Acres relies entirely on septic systems. Re-subdivision to increase residential densities should not be permitted absent an organized wastewater collection and treatment system. Potable Water. Ponderosa is served by Spokane County Water District #3, Rotchford by Vera Irrigation Dist. #15, both Group "A° Community Water Systems. Re-subdivision to increase residential densities will require adequate supply and pressure for domestic consumption and fire protection. Stormwater the Ponderosa subdivision has intermittent streams that drain to Chester Creek. The contribution of to the rate and volume of flows from additional impervious cover resulting from re-subdivision could result in an environmental damage as yet undetermined for which mitigation would need to be established in a planned and coordinated manner. Similar concerns concerning drainage which could affect Saltese Creek. A significant stream traversing the neighborhood has been reclassified as a Type 4 stream by the Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife. The implications of this change have not been assessed. The Federal Emergency Management Agency proposes to release draft floodplain maps affecting Saltese Creek is mid-2008. Erodible soils: Both the Rotchford and Ponderosa subdivisions include or abut geological hazard areas which require further evaluation prior to allowing additional residential densities. Native Vegetation/habitat: Ponderosa includes areas of wildlife critical habitat for White Tail Deer and threatened species. Spokane Valley has not yet finalized implementing regulations, performance or design standards to assure the continued preservation of environmental quality in outlying areas with limited public infrastructure and specific environmental conditions, such as steep slopes, intermittent flooding and highly erodible soils. UR 1 Interim Zoning FINDINGS Revised January 1, 2007 4of7 PUBLIC HEALTH & SAFETY: Access: Ponderosa: Property lies west of the Union Pacific Railroad with only two points of access. Additional access should be required prior to any increase in residential densities for evacuation and emergency services. The evaluation of access will be incorporated in the Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan under development by the City of Spokane Valley in the Fall and Winter of 2005-2006. Animal Maintenance: The requirements for the maintenance and upkeep of even a limited number of large animals raises issues of compatibility resulting from noise, odor, proximity to residential structures, flies, etc.. These issues are compounded with increased residential densities and requirements for buffering for any additional residential densities may be required. Landfill: Ponderosa: The proximity of a closed landfill to an increased number of residences requires additional study. Although the Spokane Valley 2006-2026 Comprehensive Plan has been adopted, Spokane Valley has not yet finalized implementing regulations, performance or design standards to assure the quality of residential design to preserve neighborhood character pursuant to the Plan. PUBLIC NOTICE: Current property owners purchased property with notice of existing regulations pertaining to the keeping of large animals. The Short Plat process requires notice only to adjacent property owners. COMPLIANCE WITH THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL. POLICY ACT (SEPAL: Ordinance No. 48 (effective March 31, 2003) adopted on an interim basis by reference the Spokane Environmental Ordinance (Spokane County) thereby implementing the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and Chapter 197-11 of the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) within the jurisdictional limits of the City of Spokane Valley. An Environmental checklist was completed and a Determination of Non-Significance was issued on April 26, 2004. Conclusions were based on the finding that a regulation preserving the status quo would have no adverse environmental impact. Concluslon(s): Implementing regulations, performance and design standards implementing the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan will be finalized on or about March 31, 2007. Rezoning with notice to affected property owners is required prior to institution of permanent regulations. III. DECISION The Interim UR-1 Residential Estate Zoning adopted pursuant to Spokane Valley Ordinance 04-035 and extended by Ordinance No. 06-001 until September 6, 2006, and until March 6, 2007, should be extended for a fourth six month period until September 6, 2007 pending finalization of development regulations, performance and design standards, in order to preserve neighborhood character, maintain environmental quality, and to ensure the continued health, safety and welfare of the areas in accordance with the revised Workplan attached as Exhibit"C". UR-1 Interim Zoning FINDINGS Revised January 1, 2007 5 ot7 UR-1 Interim Zoning FINDINGS Revised January 1, 2007 6of7 Enhlblt 'C" REVISED UR•1 Interim Zoning {Mork Plan January 1. 2007 ofa ma n.ir wv .e or a:v rt7 Taa ft" Sal Firvan ~k7n w wr r a. ur w o. o.. a. A" .r M t MaipbboelwoA CbaracaM LNZOOe irtr200a ~ Y. 2 Ca~ahMOA Plan ~ MOM 5/1 2004 R 2w 2 D w0.2 fr 30!4M wzMT 52w 4 EnVbW n. I O"We Mm ) WMT feaw 5 Samw Creak Re-Um Srtr400e 4ly200) wow a Pubae H"WS-" Ile im &MOM :4w ) i umm mmoom Aam all z= S?2fd006 taw e P Aft NWM er9r2006 6r1 VM? U-&* 9 Rsgufatm Ravi" YI?*m Y7t0/7007 saw 10 327!49100 ]lmrZ00) SS+r 11 Rem ov Goandwn uWWT )r2t*Wl 11w UR•1 Interim Zoning FINDINGS Revised January 1, 2007 7 o17 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 9, 2007 City Manager Sign-off- Item: Cbeek all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First Reading Proposed Ordinance 07-002, proposed right-of-way vacation request (S7V-04-06) for a portion of 15th Avenue. BACKGROUND: The applicant's representative Alan Gay. USKII on behalf of the owners South Terrace Spokane and Sundevil Development requests the vacation of a portion of right-of-way along 15°i Avenue located approximately 47, feet west of Carnahan Road in the vicinity of 15* Avenue cul-de-sac and a portion 23 feet east of 15°' Avenue cul-dc-sac adjacent to Carnahan Road. The half of cul-do-sac equals 3,505 square feet located between Parcel Nos. 35233.1515 & 35233.1516 (north) and 35233.2802 & 35233.2805 (south) and the portion adjacent to Carnahan is 20 feet wide by 60 feet deep located between Parcel Nos. 35233.1517 (north) and 35233.2804 (south). The Planning Commission made the following findings as part of their recommendation to City Council: 1. Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 14, 2006. The date of the hearing was set by City Council on October 24, 2006 by Spokane Valley Resolution No. 06-020. Notice of the hearing was published on November 17, 20006 in the Valley Herald, the official newspaper of the City, was posted in three conspicuous locations within the City, was PREVIOUS COUNCILCOMMISS[ON ACTION TAKEN: City Council adopted Resolution No. 06- 020 on October 24, 2006, setting the date for a public hearing hold on December 14, 2006. The Planning Commission voted 6-0 to approve the attached findings and to recommend conditional approval of the vacation. No new public comment shall be accepted since the public hearing has been closed. provided to the petitioners and abutting property owners, and a sign was placed on the property providing notice of the hearing also completed on November 17, 2006 2. The Planning Commission reviewed the report prepared by the Spokane Valley Community Development Department in detail. 3. The vacation of the street/alley will permit full development of the property for beneficial uses and permit appropriate levels of maintenance. 4. The Public Works Department submitted comments which analyzed the portions of 15'd Avenue for need and future use and responded by specifying the requested portions are no longer required for public use or public access subject to recommended conditions. 5. Given the present age and condition of adjacent development, it is unlikely that conditions will change in the future to provide a greater use or need than presently exists; and 6. No objections have been received to the proposed vacation from the notice of public hearing and/or routing to staff and agencies. OPTIONS: 1. Move to 2°d reading scheduled at next City Council Meeting for approvallapproval with conditions (No new public comment shall be accepted since the public hearing has been closed.); 2. Deny the proposed street vacation; or 3. Schedule a public hearing that will be conducted 20 days after noticing in the mail, on-site and posted three conspicuous places in the City. RECOMMENDED mono.N: Stove to Advance Ordinance 07-002 to a second reading. STAFF CONTACT: Karen Kendall, Assistant Planner ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report Planning Commission Findings Draft Ordinance Spou5ne Walley STAFF :PORT PROPOSED VACATION OF A PORTIONS OF 1.5n AVENUE Prepared by: Karen Kendall, Assistant Planner, Department of Community Development Date: December 6, 2006 Findings: 1. Abutting Properties - The right-of-way proposed for vacation is located approximately 43 feet west of Carnahan Road in the vicinity of 15`h Avenue cul-de-sac and a portion 23 feet east of 15 Avenue cul-de-sac adjacent to Carnahan Road. The half of cul-de-sac equals 3,505 square feet located between Parcel Nos. 35233.1515 & 35233.1516 (north) and 35233.2802 & 35233.2805 (south) and the portion adjacent to Carnahan is 20 feet wide by 60 feet deep located between Parcel Nos. 35233.1517 (north) and 352312804 (south). The portion of 15`h Avenue proposed to be vacated is bordered on the north by South Terrace Spokane who's requesting the proposed action and the south by SLuidevil Development. No objection from abutting property owners was received. 2. Utilities - Comments were received from City of Spokane Water and Sewer, Qwcst and Avista Utilities. Avista commented on the need to require preservation of easements for their scNices located in the portions of 15'x' Avenue proposed for vacation. 3. Access - A portion of right-of-way (20 feet by 60 feet) located between the hvo (2) requested areas was vacated previously by County Resolution No. 96-0379. Additionally in 2004 several lots were being erected from the original Woodland Terrace Plat. ISO' Avenue was required to be designed and constructed for access to the lots. The cul-de-sac on 15`h Avenue was constructed west of the existing public right-of-way due to the steep slopes and rocky terrain. The cul-de-sac is built and the three lots abutting the proposed street vacation would access directly onto 15`'' Avenue. 4. Zoning - Zoning surrounding the proposed vacation to the north, south, east and west is Urban Residential 3.5 (UR.-3.5). The six parcels which abut the proposed street vacation are in the City's Comprehensive Plan Designation as Low Density Residential as well as all surrounding properties. 5. Transportation - There is no access directly to Carnahan Street located to the east of the subject area due to a vacation by County Resolution No. 96-0379 and the steep slopes with rocky terrain. 6. Condition - The proposed areas to be vacated have not been improved or currently usable for access. The size, access and condition of the property preclude use by the City. 7. Assignment of Vacated portions of right-of-way - Absent objections from abutting properties owners, right-of-way should be assigned to the petitioners, inasmuch as it appears that any portion of the right-of-way to which they would lay claim will be transferred to them through completion and a positive approval of the vacation. Abutting property owners have received notice of the proposed vacation. Conclusions: I . The vacation of the street/alley will pennit full development of the property for beneficial uses and permit appropriate levels of maintenance. 2. The Public Works Department submitted comments which analyzed the.portions of 15th Avenue for need and future use and responded by specifying the requested portions are no longer required ,i for public use or public access subject to recommended conditions. 3. Given the present age and condition of adjacent development, it is unlikely that conditions will change in the future to provide a greater use or need than presently exists; and 4. No objections have been received to the proposed vacation from the notice of public hearing and/or routing to staff and agencies. DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 07-002 AN ORDINANCE OF TAE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON, PROVIDING FOR THE VACATION OF THE PORTIONS OF 15'H AVENUE BET`VEEN PARCEL NUMBERS 35233.1515, 35233.1516 AND 35233.1517 TO THE NORTH. AND PARCEL NUMBERS 35233.2802, 35233.2804 AND 35233.2805 TO THE SOUTH; AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, the City Council by Resolution 06-020 initiated vacation proceedings for a portion of 1516 Avenue located approximately 43 feet west of Carnahan Road in the vicinity of 15"' Avenue cul- de-sac and a portion 23 feet east of 15`h Avenue cul-de-sac adjacent to Carnahan Road. The half of cul- de-sac equals 3,505 square feet located between Parcel \'os. 35233.1515 & 35233.1516 (north) and 35233.2802 & 35233.2805 (south) and the portion adjacent to Carnahan is 20 feet wide by 60 feet deep located between Parcel 'Nos. 35233.1517 (north) and 35233.2804 (south) (STV-04-06) by providing that a hearing on the proposal would be held before the Planning Commission on the 14th day of December, 2006; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 14, 2006; and WHFRrAS, following a hearing, the Planning Commission found that the notice and hearing requirements of Title 10 Article TX Section 10.09.04.10 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code have been 1 met, and further found that: 1. The vacation of the street/alley will permit full development of the property for beneficial uses and permit appropriate levels of maintenance. 2. The Public Works Department submitted comments which analyzed the portions of 15th Avenue for need and future use and responded by specifying the requested portions are no longer required for public use or public access subject to recommended conditions. 3. Given the present age and condition of adjacent development, it is unlikely that conditions will change in the future to provide a greater use or need than presently exists; mid 4. No objections have been received to the proposed vacation from the notice of public hearing and/or routing to staff and agencies. \VFfEREAS, the Planning Commission findings and/or minutes have been filed with the City Clerk as part of the public record supporting the vacation; and \VI-1EREAS, none of the property owners abutting the property to be vacated filed a written objection to the proposed vacation with the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, through adopted City Code provisions, the City shall provide that the vacated property be transferred to the abutting property owners, one-half to each, unless circumstances require a different division of property; that the zoning district designation of the properties adjoining each side of the street shall attach to the vacated property; that a record of survey shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development; and that all direct and indirect costs of title transfer to the vacated street be paid by the proponent or recipient of the transferred property; and Ordinance 07-002 Street Vacation STV-04-06 Page 1 of 4 DRAFT WHEREAS, the City Council desires to vacate the above street pursuant to Spokane Valley Municipal Code Sections 10.05.220 - .380. NOW, THEKEFORI, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, do ordain as follows: Section 1. Findin a of Fact. The City Council makes the following findings of fact: (1) the City Department of Public Works has reviewed the right-of-"gay to be vacated and determined that the property adjacent to the vacated property is otherwise served by public or private access; (2) a public hearing on the proposed vacation has been held in accordance with State Law and City Code before the Planning Commission with the record of such hearing and proceedings filed with the City Clerk; (3) no written comments were received by an abutting properties. Section 2. Propertto be Vacated. Based upon the above findings and in accordance with this Ordinance, the City Council does hereby vacate the street or alley described on the attached Exhibit "A" which is incorporated herein by reference. Section 3. Zoning. The Zoning designation for the vacated property shall be the designation attached to the adjoining properties as set forth within the respective property or lot lines. The Director of Community Development is authorized to make this notation on the official Zoning Map of the City. Section 4. Conditions of Vacation. The following conditions shall be fully satisfied prior to the transfer of title by the City. a) A record of survey prepared by a registered surveyor in the State of Washington and including an exact metes and bounds legal description and specifying if applicable any and all casements for construction, repair and maintenance of existing and future utilities and services. The record of survey shall contain the professional stamp and signature of the registered surveyor and should be filed upon completion with the Spokane County Auditor. The surveyor shall provide the City of Spokane Valley with a nrylar copy of the recorded survey and the Auditor's Document Number and date of recordation; and b) The surveyor shall locate at least two monuments on the centerline of the vacated right-of-way with one located at the intersection of the centerline of the vacated right-of-way with each street or right-of- way in accordance with the standards established by the Sl)okane County Standards for Road and Server Construction; and c) All necessary easements required by Avista shall be shown on the record of survey and written documentation from all utility companies is required to be submitted to the Community Development Director, or designee verifying all easements have been indicated; and d) Payment of all direct and indirect costs of title transfer of the vacated street or alley from public to private ownership including but not limited to title company charges, copying fees, and recording fees; and e) The applicable zoning district designation (Urban Residential-3.5) shall be automatically extended to the center of such vacation, and all area included in the vacation shall then and henceforth be subject to all regulations of the extended districts. Section 5. Closing. Following satisfaction of the above conditions, the City Clerk shall record a certified copy of this Ordinance in the office of the County Auditor, and the City Manager is Ordinance 07-002 Street Vacation STV-04-06 Page 2 of 4 DRAFT authorized to execute all necessary documents, including a Quit Claim Deed, in order to complete the transfer of the property identified herein. Section 6. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council this day of 2007. Mayor, Diana Wilhite ATTEST: City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge Approved As To Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: - Page 3 of Ordinance 07-002 Street Vacation S'rV-04-06 4 DRAFT Exhibit "A" Proacrty Description 01MICATIE0 ARE PCB )%,EtJ •5U898.. ,ry 1.5th Avenue DEDICATED AiEA PER AFA .536 ENS YAC EO, G.C. 1_= c 20.43` I cK=•50.04° ~ ! C 3,503 ;5;.F- AREA TO f-.E arnahan Road Ordinance 07-002 Street Vacation STV-04-06 Page 4 of 4 l FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION C) December 14, 2006 Findings: l . The Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 14, 2006 to receive testimony concerning the vacation of a portion right-of-way along 1P Avenue located appro.Yimatcly 43 feet west of Carnahan Road in the vicinity of 15'b Avenue cul-de-sac and a portion 23 feet east of 15`s Avenue cul-de-sac adjacent to Carnahan Road. The half of cul-de-sac equals 3,505 square feet located between Parcel Nos. '35233.15 l5 & 35233.1516 (north) and 35233.2802 & 35233.2805 (south) and the portion adjacent to Carnahan is 20 feet wide by 60 feet deep located between Parcel Nos. 35233.1517 (north) and 35233.2804 (south). The date of the hearing was set by City Council on October 24, 2006 by Spokane Valley Resolution No. 06-020. Notice of the hearing was published on November 17, 20006 in the Valley Herald, the official newspaper of the City, was posted in three conspicuous locations within the City, was provided to the petitioners and abutting property owners, and a sign was placed on the property providing notice of the hearing also completed on November 1.7, 2006. 2. The Planning Commission reviewed the report prepared by the Spokane Valley Community Development Department in detail. 3. The vacation of the streettalley will permit full development of the property for beneficial uses and permit appropriate levels of maintenance. 4. The Public Works Department submitted comments which analyzed the portions of 15`x' Avenue for need and future use and responded by specifying the requested portions are no longer required for public use or public access subject to recommended conditions. 5. Given the present age and condition of adjacent development, it is unlikely that conditions will change in the future to provide a greater use or need than presently exists; and 6. No objections have been received to the proposed vacation from the notice of public hearing and/or routing to staff and agencies. Conclusions: The Spokane Valley'Planning Commission therefore recommends to the City Council the portion of right- of-way along 1 P Avenue located approximately 43 feet west of Carnahan Road in the vicinity of 15°i Avenue cul-de-sac and a portion 23 feet east of 15`s Avenue cul-de-sac adjacent to Carnahan Road. The half ofcul-de-sac equals 3,505 square feet located between Parcel Nos. 35233.1515 & 35233.1516 (north) and 35233.2802 & 35233.2805 (south) and the portion adjacent to Carnahan is 20 feet wide by 60 Peet deep located between Parcel Nos. 35233.1517 (north) and 35233.2804 (south) be vacated to the petitioners subject to: 1. Following the City Council's passage of the ordinance approving the proposal to vacate the street or alley, a record of survey of the area to be vacated, prepared by a registered surveyor in the State of Washington and including an exact metes and bounds legal description, and specifying if applicable any and all easements for construction, repair and maintenance of existing and future utilities and services, shall be submitted by the proponent to the Director. The record of survey shall contain the professional stamp and signature of the registered surveyor and filed upon completion with the Spokane County Auditor. The surveyor shall provide the City of Spokane Valley with a mylar copy of the recorded survey and the Auditor's Document Number Auld date of recordation. 2. The surveyor shall locate at least two monuments on the centerline of the vacated right-of-way with one located at the intersection of the centerline of the vacated right-of-way with each street or I~ i right-of-way in accordance with the standards established by the Spokane County Standardsfor Road and Sewer Construction. 3. All necessary easements required by Avista shall be shown on the record of survey and written documentation from all utility companies is required to be submitted to the Community Development Director, or designee verifying all easements have been indicated. 4. All direct and indirect costs of title transfer of the vacated street or alley from public to private ownership including but not limited to title company charges, copying fees, and recording fees are to be borne by the proponent. The City will not assume any financial responsibility for any direct or indirect costs for the transfer of title. 5. The zoning district designation of the properties adjoining each side of the street or alley to be vacated shall be automatically extended to the center of such vacation, and all area shall included in the vacation shall then and henceforth be subject to all regulations of the extended districts. The adopting ordinance shall specify this zoning district extension inclusive of the applicable zoning district designations. 6. A certified copy of the ordinance vacating a street or alley or part thereof shall be recorded by the city clerk in the office of the Spokane County auditor: 7. All conditions of City Council authorization shall be fully satisfied prior to any transfer of title by the City. Approved this 14"' day of December, 2006 Gail Kogle, Chairman ATUS`C Deanna Griffith, Administrative Assistant C-) CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 9, 2007 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Fiber Internet Service for CenterPlace GOVERNING LEGISLATION: NIA PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council previously declined to install fiber based on high cost versus benefit. BACKGROUND: The cost to provide fiber technology to CenterPlace for Internet service has continued to drop. At this time, Time Warner is proposing to provide fiber at no installation cost and a monthly recurring cost of $886. This results in a net increase of $201 for fiber versus copper (including the $260 in savings which will result from the elimination of the two T1 lines between City Hall and CenterPlace). At the April 12, 2005 City Council meeting, staff discussed with Council an installation cost of $48,000 and a monthly recurring cost of $2,300. So, the current proposal is much more economical. While it is impossible to predict with certainty, it appears that fiber cost has reached a low point and is worth reconsidering. The additional capacity will allow the City (or third party providers) to pursue video conferencing from CenterPlace. The fiber will also provide increased capacity for future Internet based services. OPTIONS: 1. Install Internet fiber at CenterPlace. 2. Continue using T1 lines for Internet services. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize installation of Internet Fiber at CenterPlace. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: $2,412 increased cost in telephone services. STAFF CONTACT: Mike Jackson, Parks & Recreation Director ATTACHMENTS: December 27, 2006 Memorandum from Bing Bingaman; Information Technology Specialist To: Mike Jackson, Parks & Rec. Director From: Bing, Information Technology Specialist CC: Date: December 27, 2006 Re: Fiber Internet Service for CenterPlace Upgrade Internet Service for CenterPlace Proposal to support larger conferences and video/telephone conferencing Mike here's a brief overview: o Originally Time Warner wanted $30,000 to install the fiber, and then $1,355 per month for 10 MB fiber internet connection; they are now offering no install cost, $886.00 per month for 6 MB connection. o Currently we are paying Oneeighty networks at total of $425.00 per month for internet service; $125.00 for the Private T1 Line and $300.00 for the internet service at 1.5 MB o We are also paying 180.00 x2 for a total of $360.00 for two T1's between City Hall and CenterPlace: • 1 for phone transport • 1 for data transport c The costs of the two T1's for transport will be eliminated once we finish the fiber install (before the end of the year). Our re-occurring cost will then be $100.00 per month (Fiber agreement with Columbia, $20/mile) for a savings of $260.00 / month. o So the difference we are talking about it is: ■ Currently, 1.5 MB internet service and 3 T1's = $785.00 / month ■ Proposed, 6 MB of internet service and fiber = $986.00 / month • After all is said and done, net increase cost of $201 to go 4 times as fast which will allow us to start working on video/teleconferencing. 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 2, 2007 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: p consent ❑ Old business ❑ New business ❑ Public Hearing x❑ Information a Admin. Report[] Pending Legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Request for Qualifications (RFQ): City Center Consulting Services GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council approved a contract for consulting services to develop a subarea plan for the Sprague/Appleway corridor, including designating and planning a city center. Preliminary recommendations concerning a proposed location for the city center was presented to Council at a joint Planning CommissionlCity Council meeting on September 14, 2006. BACKGROUND: On September 14, 2006, at a Joint Planning Commission/City Council meeting, the City's lead consultant for the Sprague/Appleway Corridor Revitalization Plan presented to council three options to pursue the development of a city center: 1. Master plan the preferred site, adopt zoning regulations that would allow a city center to be constructed, then wait for the market to build it. 2. Master plan and zone the preferred site and then "stimulate" developer interest by constructing civic buildings and/or other capital improvements such as streets, sidewalks and parks. 3. Master plan and zone the preferred site, secure property by purchase or option, market the city center plan to developers through a competitive Request for Proposals (RFP) process and then resell property to selected developer. Option 1 provides the least financial risk to the City, but will likely take a significant amount of time for a city center to develop, if it happens at all. Option 2 requires a significant financial investment from the City for capital improvements, and therefore poses a greater financial risk, but the chances of getting a city center constructed are better than Option 1. Option 3 gives the City control over the project and potentially is the fastest way to get a city center constructed. However, it is the riskiest option because it requires the City to play a much more active development role. City Council expressed interested in exploring Option 3. Michael Freedman suggested that the City would be best served by hiring a consultant to assist in contacting and negotiating with property owners in the area preliminarily designated as city center "Phase 1 To keep the city center project moving forward, staff has prepared the attached draft RFQ for Council's review. OPTIONS: 1) Move forward with the RFQ as proposed or amended; or 2) Provide additional direction to staff. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Provide input to staff. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The cost of the consultant is preliminarily estimated at $50,000. Funding for the Sprague-Appleway Revitalization Plan is included in the 2007 budget, but did not include the cost of these proposed consulting services. If Council approves moving forward with this proposal, the cost would be incorporated into the City's spring 2007 budget amendment. STAFF CONTACT: Scott Kuhta, Senior Planner Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager Attachments: Proposed RFQ S pukan~~ jUalley CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Community Development Department REQUEST FOR. QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) City Center Property Negotiations, Acquisition and Development SUBMITTAL DEADLINE February 2, 2007 SUBMIT Original plus four (4) duplicate copies DELIVER TO: City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department Al-]'N: Scott Kuhta, Senior Planner 11707 E. Sprague Avenue, Suite 106 Spokane Valley, Washington 99206-5444 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION DESCRIPTION PAC REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS ................................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION .1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .........................................................................................ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINE D. PROJF..CT SCHEDULE . I PROJECT ESTIMATE .1 SCOPE OF SERVICES .1 PERFORMANCE OF SERVICES 1 CONS ULY'ANI' SELECTION SCHEDULE SELECTION PROCESS INTER.VIEWS I ADDENDA 2 CONFIDENTIALITY 2 GENERAL CONDITIONS 2 INSURANCE 2 EVALUATION COMMITTEE 2 SUBMITTAL 2 FORMAT AND BINDING 3 PACKAGING 3 DELIVERY 3 FEDERAL EEO, ADA, CIVIL RIGHTS REQUIREMENTS ATTACI•iMI ,NT A - PART I i . ATTACHMENT A - PART 2 ..............................................................................................................................................5 ATTACHMENT B - EVALUATION CRITERIA AND WEIGHTS ...............................................................................G ATTACHMENT C-MANDATORY `fE.IRMS AND CONDITIONS ..............................................................................7 ATTACHMENT D - INSURANCE REQUIRFMIENL'S -II- REQUEST FOR QUALITICATI:ONS .cITR0QUCTI0N: The City of Spokane Valley is currently developing a revitalization plan for the Sprague/Appleway corridor. A key part of the plan is to designate and develop a new City Center along the corridor. A preferred site has been selected and the City is initiating discussions with current property owners concerning fbture development plans. The City of Spokane Valley seeks assistance from a CONSULTANT with extensive real estate negotiation and development experience in both public and private sector realms. The CONSULTANT must have extensive experience in negotiating and executing complicated real estate purchase, options, development and financing agreements, specifically relating to mixed-use/town center developments. The CONSULTANT will also have extensive knowledge of retail, office and residential markets, including national trends in real estate development and retail consumerism. PROJECT SC14EDULF: Work under this contract shall begin on or about March 19, 2007 and is anticipated to be completed by December 31, 2007. PROJECT ESTIMATE: The anticipated cost range for this work is $20,000 to $50,000. SCOPE OF SF.,RVICES: The selected CONSULTANT will serve as the City's key strategic advisor in all City Center negotiations and deal structuring. The CONSULTANT will review the City's plans and progress towards developing a City Center in the vicinity of University Avenue at Sprague and Appleway. The CONSULTANT will lead discussions and assist in negotiations with key property owners within the preferred City Center location. The CONSULTANT will negotiate terms of a development agreement between the City and property owners and/or developers to construct the City Center. (7)RhORMANCE OF SERVICES: The City intends that the firm awarded a contract will perform the work commencing upon the notice to proceed and terminate upon project completion unless terminated sooner with written notification by the City. The designation of a firm as "most highly qualified" by the City is not intended to be nor will it be a guarantee that all professional services required by the City, appropriate to a firm of its type, will be exclusively performed by that firm. The City retains the right to award work, on this or any other project, to other firms. CONSULTANT SELECTION SCHEDULE: (T he follotiving dates are based upon initial platminrg and should be considered teiyative). 1. Evaluate applications the week of February 5, 2007. 2. Interview finalists (if conducted) the week of February 26, 2007. 3. Designation of the most highly qualified firm week of March 5, 2007. SELECTION PROCESS: A recommendation committee will rank all proper submittals based on the evaluation criteria set forth in this packet... From these rankings either a recommendation for the most highly qualified firm will be made or a short list of leading candidates will be developed for the purpose of interviews. Spokane Valley reservers the right to select the most highly qualified firm based solely on the written response to the evaluation criteria. interviews are not a mandatory part of this process. Spokane Valley will be the sole judge in the determination of the most highly qualified firm. 1NTf R.ViEWS: Interviews will be held at the sole option of the City. If interviews are conducted firms should plan to have key personnel on their interview teams who will be assigned to the work on the proposed project. Short listed firms may be C ed to provide supplemental or additional information for review by the committee prior to the interviews. The City reserves the right to utilize new or revised evaluation criteria and weights to be used in evaluation of the firms January 15, 2007 City Center Property Negotiations Page 1 of 1 l being interviewed. If changes are made to the criteria or weights they will be reduced to writing and be sent to the interview candidates prior to the conduct of the interviews. Committee members will use the applicable evaluation criteria and weights-to evaluate interview information. Previous clients may be contacted as part of the evaluation process. The recommendation committee will rank the firms interviewed and present their recommendation to the City Council for selection of the most highly qualified firm. ADDENDA: All official clarifications or interpretations of the documents will be by written addenda issued by Spokane Valley. Clarifications or answers to questions given by Spokane Valley during the submittal process will be considered informal and unofficial. The City is not responsible for oral interpretations. Notification of any apparent discrepancies, omissions, or doubt as to meaning found in this document should be submitted in writing to the person designated to receive administrative questions. Acknowledge receipt of addenda in Attachment A, Part 1 D. Failure to provide acknowledgment may result in the submittal being rejected as not responsive. CONF_ID_EN_TiA_LITY: Firms responding to this Request For Qualifications (RFQ) are hereby put on notice that Spokane Valley will regard submittals as public records which will be available for public inspection and/or copying, subject to the public disclosure requirements of RCW Chanter 42.17 after selection of a Finn is made regardless of any markings or notices contained in the submittal documents. Therefore, if these terms are not acceptable, a Finn should not respond to this RFQ. GENERAL CONDITIONS: This RFQ does not commit Spokane Valley to award a contract or to pay any costs incurred in preparing a submittal or to procure or contract for services or supplies. Spokane Valley reserves the right not to select any firm(s) for the services based on this RFQ, to accept or reject any or all submittals, or to cancel, at its discretion, this RFQ at any time. Declaring a Finn as the most highly qualified to perform the work of this RFQ is not intended nor will it in any way be construed or considered to be a contract or an exclusive guarantee to furnish professional services associated with this project or any other work suitable to a firm of its type. After declaration of the most highly qualified firm a statement of work and price for services will be negotiated between the City and the firm. If an agreement cannot be reached with the selected firm negotiations will be terminated and the next most qualified firm will be contacted for contract negotiations. No work will be undertaken without a mutually agreed upon statement of work, fee, and contract signed by the parties. Any contract awarded will be nonexclusive and if it be in the City's best interest it may award work to other firms. Any contracts resulting from this RFQ will be between the City and the provider of services and may be canceled upon written notification by the City. INSURANCE: The CONSULTANT will be required to carry, for the duration of any contract resulting from this RFQ, the insurance types and amounts as set forth in Attachment D - Insurance Requirements. EVALUATION CON IITTEE: Typically evaluation committees try to review all presentations at one sitting in order to facilitate continuity, which helps improve the consistency of the individual scoring. Due to the number of firms that usually respond and a limited amount of time available for review it is strongly recommended that the response be concise and to the point. The response should be structured in order to make it easy for the committee to evaluate the firm's professional capabilities and experience. SUBMITTAL: The submittal response consists of the following items which should be submitted in the following order January 15, 2007 City Center Property Negotiations Page 2 of 11 Item 1: Cover letter (optional but not required). Item 2: Attachment A - Part 1, General Information Sheet and receipt of addenda acknowledgment. To facilitate identification of the submission please use this sheet, or reproduction, as the second sheet behind the cover sheet/cover letter on the inside of all document copies. Item 3: Attachment A - Part 2, Administrative Information. Item 4: Attachment B - Response to the evaluation criteria in Attachment B. Use Attachment B as the presentation outline. Respond to all items. The short statements following each item are offered as starting points only. Respondents are to add additional information required to more fully develop their responses so that the response makes sense for this project. Index your responses to each item if you do not use the format of Attachment B as your outline. Answer each item fully, completely and concisely. Submissions will become part of the official records for this request for professional qualifications and cannot be returned. FORMAT AND BINDING: Submittals shall be limited to 30 double-sided sheets (8 %i" x 11 excluding covers and dividers. Personnel resumes should be no longer than one page. Type size for text should be at least 10-points. Data submitted should be bound in a single volume. Depending on thickness a staple in the upper left corner or plastic spiral, 19- ring binding is preferred. Please do not submit materials bound in a three-ring type binder. The cover should be of a suitable weight paper to protect the data. Bulk must be kept to an absolute minimum. Any material submitted for consideration must be incorporated in each resnonse coov. A single set of material will not be reviewed. PACKAGING: Submissions shall be scaled in an opaque envelope or package which has been clearly marked in the upper ' -ft corner with the Firm's name and address. In the center of the envelope or package write out "REQUEST FOR IUALIFiCATiONS #05-002", followed by the submittal date of and title words "City Center Property Negotiations." DELIVERY: Submittals must be received on the day, date, time and location stipulated on the cover sheet. Submittals delivered late may be rejected as non-responsive and be returned unopened. FEDERAL, EEO. ADA, CIVI_L_ RIQHJS REOWREMENTS The City of Spokane Valley in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 252, 42 U.S.C. 2000d to 2000dA and Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Department of Transportation, subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, Part 21, nondiscrimination in federally assisted programs of the Department of Transportation issued pursuant to such Act, hereby notifies all interested parties that it will affirmatively insure that in any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, disadvantaged business enterprises will be afforded full opportunity to submit qualifications in response to this invitation and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color or national origin in consideration for an award. The City of Spokane Valley encourages disadvantaged, minority, and women-owned CONSULI'AN'r firms to respond. Persons with disabilities may request this information be prepared and supplied in alternate forms by calling the City of Spokane Valley City Hall at (509) 921-1000. January 15, 2007 City Center Property Negotiations Page 3 of 1 I ATTACHMENT A - PART I GENERAL, INFORMATION A. Legal Name of Applicant Company B. Name of Contact Person Title Telephone lumber including area code C. Did outside individuals/agencies assist with preparation ofthis program? _ YES _ NO If "Yes", please describe: D, RECEIPT OF Af DWDA: Firm acknowledges receipt of the following addenda if any: Addendum No. Addendum No. Addendum No. Addendum No. Dated Dated Dated Dated I certify that to the best of my knowledge the information contained in this RFQ for qualifications is accurate and complete and that I have the legal authority to commit this agency to a contractual agreement. I realize the final funding for any service is based upon funding levels and the approval of the Spokane Valley City Council. Print Name Signature, Administrator, or Applicant Agency Title Date January 15, 2007 City Center Property Negotiations Page 4 of .11 ~,-,-»SDMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION A. FIRM: 1. Name of firm: ATTACTI MENT A - PART 2 2. Business address including zip code: 3. Telephone number including area code: 4. Fax number including area code: 5. Federal Tax Identification Number: 6. Washington State UBI Number if issued: 7. State Industrial Account Identification Number if issued: 8. Following is a listing of all engagements the company has undertaken in the last five years that have resulted in: (a) Arbitration or litigation and the disposition of the cases. (b) Claims being filed by the Federal Government or the Washington State Departments of L & 1, Employment Security or Revenue. (c) Liens or claims recorded with the Spokane County Auditor by suppliers or subcontractors. List with whom, for what, and amount. B. INSURANCE COMPANY: 1. Name of Insurance Company 2. Name of Insurance Agent: 3. Address including zip code: 4. Telephone number including area code: January 15, 2007 City Center Property Negotiations Page 5 of l l ATTACHMENT B - EVALUATION CRITERIA AND WEIGHTS It is strongly recommended that this be used as the outline for your response. Criteria Description (Evaluation Weight 1. PROJECT TEAM EXPERIENCE &c QUALIFICATIONS .......................................................................................20 a. Summarize the relevant experience and qualifications of your Project Manager, Project Engineer, Lead Designer and other key personnel. Discuss the ways in which the experience and qualifications of these individuals would benefit the City on this project. b. Discuss the capabilities/benefits of any specialty staff and/or subconsultant~s that you have included on your team for this project. c. Address the home office and availability of the team members and the support staff throughout the anticipated proiect time frarne. 2. FIRM'S EXPERIENCE WiTFI SIMILAR PROJECTS ............................................................................................30 a. Provide information regarding the track record of the firm in negotiating complex real estate and development agreements on behalf of government agencies. b. Provide references (with contact names and telephone numbers) for similar projects completed within the last three years. c. Provide descriptions of two similar projects undertaken recently by the firm; discuss the size and complexity of the projects, the special issues, and the challenges that were addressed. d. Address the firm's success in conforming to the schedules and budgets for the projects. 3. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING & APPROACH .......................................................................................................2.-_.. a. Describe the firm's capacity to recognize "project specific" issues and develop creative solutions to address them. b. Provide two examples of challenges and resulting solutions from previous projects. c. Describe the ways in which the firm will apply knowledge gained from past projects to specific issues on this project. d. Describe the firm's tirmiliarity with relevant environmental code., and standards. 4. PROJECT MANAGEMENT & SCHEDULE .............................................................................................................20 a. Describe the involvement and the duties of the project manager in detail, with a clear description of the ways 41 which productivity will be monitored, and the project will be kept on budget and on schedule. b. Discuss the quality control measures that will be put in place, and describe the stages of document review and the team members that will be involved and their responsibilities. c. Provide a schedule for the project, identifying key milestones and exhibiting knowledge of the various activities involved under the major tasks. 5. ORGANIZATION AND CLARITY OF RFQ SUBMITTAL ......................................................................................5 The organkuition of the RFQ submittal and the manner in which information is presented in the submittal is an indication of the firm's ability to assemble clear and concise document,,. TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS 100 January 15, 2007 City Center Property Negotiations Page 6 of 11 ATTACHMENT C - MANDATORY TERMS AND CONDITIONS 'he City will prepare contracts based upon a scope of work and fee as negotiated and approved by the CONSULTANT and the City. The following are minimum conditions that shall be incorporated in contracts resulting from this RFQ. Firms considering responding to this RFQ are well advised to take these paragraphs into consideration when making their decision whether to submit a response or not. Should the City and CONSULTANT flail in their negotiations the City reserves the right to end negotiations, at a time of it-, choosing, and begin negotiations with the next "most highly qualified finn. Failure to negotiate a scope of work and fee will not terminate the s "eligibility" status. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS: All drawings, plans, specifications and other deliverable documents under this agreement will become the property of the City without restriction, reservation or qualification. Any reuse without written verification or adaptation by CONSULTANT for the specific purpose intended, will be at the City's sole risk and without liability or legal exposure to CONSULTANT arising out of or resulting therefore. Any such verification or adaptation will entitle CONSULTANT to further compensation at rates to be agreed upon by the City and CONSULTANT. INSURANCE: The CONSULTANT shall continue coverage meeting the requirements of this RFQ for the duration of the contract. VENUE STIPULATION: This Agreement has and shall be construed as having been made and delivered in the State of Washington and the laws of the State of Washington shall be applicable to its construction and enforcement of this Agreement or any provision hereto shall be instituted only in the courts of competent jurisdiction within Spokane County, Washington. INDEMNIFICATION: The CONSULTANT agrees to defend, indemnify and hold the City harmless from any and ail claims, including but not limited to reasonable attorney fees, demands, losses and liabilities to or by third parties arising from, resulting from, an error, omission or negligent act of the CONSULTANT performed under this contract by the CONSULTANT, its agents or employees to the fullest extent permitted by law. The CONSULTANT's duty to indemnify the City shall not apply to liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damage to property caused by or resulting from the sole negligence of the City, its agents or employees. The CONSULTANTs duty to indemnify the City for liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damage to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence or (a) the City, its agents or employees, and (b) CONSULTANT, its agents or employees shall apply only to the extent of negligence of the CONSULTANT or its agents or employees. CONSUL`I'ANTs duty to defend, indemnify and hold the City harmless shall include, as to all claims, demands, losses and liability to which it applies, the City's personnel-related costs, reasonable attorney's fees, court costs and all other claim-related expenses. The CONSULTANT's indemnification shall specifically include all claims for loss liability because of wrongful payments under the Uniform Conunereial Code, or other statutory or contractual liens or rights or third parties, including taxes, accrued or accruing as a result of this contract or work performed or materials furnished directly or indirectly because of this contract. CONSULTANT further agrees that this duty to indemnify City applies regardless of any provisions in RCW Title 51 to the contrary, including but not limited to any immunity of CONSULTANT for liability for injuries to CONSUL,TANT's workers and employees, and CONSULTANT hereby waives any such immunity for the purpose of this duty to indemnify City. RELATIONSHIP OF 114.E. PARTIES: The parties intend that an independent contractor relationship will be j waated by this Agreement. The City is interested only in the results that could be achieved and the conduct and control of _,J services will be solely with the CONSULTAN`T'. No agent, employee, servant or otherwise of the CONSULTANT shall be deemed to be an employee, agent, servant, or otherwise of the City for any purpose and the employees of the January 15, 2007 City Center Property Negotiations Page 7 of I 1 CONSULTANT are not entitled to any of the benefits that the City provides for City employees. The CONSULTANT" will be solely and entirely responsible for its acts and the acts of its agents, employees, servants, subcontractors or otherwise, during the performance of this Agreement. OT -fr.R EMPLOYMENT: Contracts resulting from this RFQ are not exclusive services Agreements. The CONSULTANT may take on other professional assignments while completing work tinder this RFQ. PAYMENT OF TAXES: This Contract is for the employment of the CONSULTANT as an independent contractor. The CONSULTANT holds that they are an independent contractor doing business as listed above and is solely responsible for paying any and all taxes associated with the work of this Agreement including but not necessarily limited to income and social security taxes. January 15, 2007 City Center Property Negotiations Page 8 of 11 ATTACHMENT P - INSURANCI, REQULREMENTS ~JllEMNIFICATiQN /HOLD HARMLESS: CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, it-, officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits including attorney fees, arising out ofor resulting from the acts, errors or omissions of the CONSULTANT in performance of this Agreement, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City. INSURANCE: The CONSULTANT shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the CONSULTANT, its agents, representatives, or employees. Minimum Scope of Insurance: CONSULTANT shall obtain insurance of the types described below: 1. Automobile Liability insurance covering all owned, non-owned, hired and leased vehicles. Coverage shall be written on insurance Services Office (ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary, the policy shall be endorsed to provide contractual liability coverage. 2. Commercial General Liabi%, insurance shall be written on ISO occurrence form CO 00 01 and shall cover liability arising from premises, operations, independent contractors and personal iniury and advertising injury. The City shall be named as an insured under the CONSULTANT,s Commercial General Liability insurance policy with respect to the work performed for the City. 3. Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the industrial Insurance laws of the State of Washington. 4. Professional _Uahility insurance appropriate to the CONSULTANT's profession. Minimum Amounts of Insurance: CONSULTANT shall maintain the following insurance limits: 1. Aut mobile Liability insurance with a minimum combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage of $1,000,000 per accident. 2. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written with limits no less than $1,000,000 each occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate. 3. Professional Liability insurance shall be written with limits no less than $1,000,000 per claim and $1,000,000 policy aggregate Iimit. OTHER INSURANCE PROVISIONS: The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions for Automobile Liability, Professional Liability and Commercial General Liability insurance: 1. The CONSULTANT's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respect the City. Any insurance, self-insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of the CONSULTANT's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 2. The CONSULTANT's insurance shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be cancelled by either party, except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. ACCEPTABILrl'Y OF INSURERS: insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not less Yn A:VI;1. January 15, 2007 City Center Property Negotiations Page 9 of 1 i VERIFICATION OF COVERAGE: CONSULTANT shall furnish the City with original certificates and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of the CONSULTANT before commencement of the work. January 15, 2007 City Center Property Negotiations Page 10 of 1 l CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 9, 2007 City Manager Sign--off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information X admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Dangerous Dog Appeal procedures GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 7.30 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Resolution 03-046 delegating authority to BoCC to hear appeals relating to dangerous dogs and potentially dangerous dogs. Administrative report to Council on December 12, 2006. BACKGROUND: The Board of Commissioners for Spokane County have considered appeals of determinations that certain dogs are "dangerous" as that term is defined in City Code. The BoCC recently advised the City that they are going to discontinue doing these appeals for us. This change of appeal body meant that the City would need to revise some of its appeal procedures in the municipal code. On December 12, 2006, the Council gave staff direction to Ji redraft the procedures in a manner that sends appeals of administrative decisions to the Hearing Examiner, whose decision would be final, appealable to Superior court. Currently, we have adopted the County regulations under Spokane County Code 5.04 by reference. In drafting and discussing the changes with the Hearing Examiner and Nancy Hill, they expressed a belief that it would be more clear for Animal Control and the Hearing Examiner to use the regulations if we were to customize the County regulations to the City, and adopt them as our own. Based on that, I am re-drafting all of the County code sections in 5.04, reformatting them for adoption as SVMC 7.30.100, et seq. I will continue reviewing and discussing the proposed changes with County staff prior to first reading, scheduled for January 23, 2007. OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: None needed, update only. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: Cary P. Driskell, Deputy City Attorney ATTACHMENTS: S#64 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhail@spokanevalley.org Memorandum Date: January 3, 2006 To: City Council; Dave Mercier, City Manager; Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager From: Mike Jackson, Parks and Recreation Director Re: Contract for Architectural and Engineering Services for Outdoor Pool Renovations The City of Spokane Valley advertised a Request for Proposal for architectural firms to conduct public input meetings, review existing pool conditions and provide consulting, design and architectural services to renovate and remodel the City's three outdoor swiminuig pools. Two proposals were received. Eased on the proposals, Mike Jackson, Parks and Recreation Director and Steve Worley, Senior Engineer for Capital Improvement Projects have been negotiating scope of work and fees with ORII Architects of Renton, Washington. The standard City of Spokane Valley Agreement for Professional Services is being developed for this work and the fee for Architectural and Engineering services is currently estimated at $196,711.00. The fee is based on a total project cost is $1,600,000. The preliminary project schedule calls :for pre-design beginning in January/February 2007 with the project to be bid in June 2007. Construction is anticipated to begin at the close of the 2007 swimming season and be completed prior to the 2008 opening. CITI n~F pd ane j Valley 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhaUspokanevatley.org Memorandum Date: January 3, 2007 To: Dave Mercier, City Manager; Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager From: Mike Jackson, Parks and Recreation Director Re: Cyclocross Emde Sports hosted the state Cyclocross (bicycle cross country race) event at Valley Mission Park on November 10, 2006. This event was very successful with over 100 riders attending the event. There was minimal damage to the turf which was quickly corrected by Einde Sports. Erode Sports feels that they have a good chance of-winning the bid to bring the National Cyclocross Finals to Spokane Valley in 2009 and 2010. I met with Michael and Marla of Emde Sports and the Chris Frye with the Regional Sports Conunission on December 12`x'. They are requesting that the City make Valley Mission Park available for the National Cyclocross event at Valley Mission Park in 2009 and 2010. An event of this magnitude (1,000 riders) would cause considerable damage to the turf at Valley 'i\,tission Park which could be repaired with reseeding. Emde Sports along with the Sports Commission is willing to provide all of the material and services to repair. The economic impact which the race will have on Spokane Valley is significant and should outweigh the damage that will be caused to the turn in the park.. It is my recommendation that we consider hosting the National Cyclocross at Valley Mission Park.. I will provide additional details as they become available. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 9, 2007 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing X information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Agreement for use of Geiger work crews GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 39.34 Interlocal Agreement Act PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: The City has, from time to time, utilized Geiger work crews to perform certain manual labor in the City's rights-of-way, primarily for weed abatement. This was done prior to a contract being formally executed. Staff wanted to formalize the relationship and spell out the terms under which future work would be performed. Several draft agreements have been discussed, and staff is close to forwarding a proposed final draft. OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: NA BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Use of crews is $250 per half day. STAFF CONTACT: Cary P. Driskell, Deputy City Attorney ATTACHMENTS: it i