2006, 05-02 Study Session
:tcFNnA
C.I"I'Y(lF SPC)K-ANF/ VAIJ1.El'
CIT1' COUNCIL WORKSITCET
S'1'UDYSE.'..,~ION
Tucsdxv, May 2, 200b 6:00 p.m.
crrv HAI1. COUNCIL ClIA,tiIRERS
11707 Exst Sprxguc Ai•eaue, rirst rtoor
(Piease Turn C3ff All EIcrirunir De%iecs During the Meeting)
I)ISCUti,tilON LF:.AllEIt S[tB.JF.CT/ACT1V1'TY GOAL
1. Neii Krrstcn!Sti•vr 1Vorle}' Pmpnsed 2007 ^Q!2 'Cranspartatic,n lmprovement viseuni(mllnformution
I 10 minutc=.) !'i(!LS'111ll ( I II'M artt! 20f17 Annual Construction Pro};ram
Nril Ker,ten (14, nsisiutc5) t,mnmliant ('~)nsidrrntion for titrucl titi.;ter !'Ian Uiscussianllnfoimatinn
Nei1 Kcrsten (15 minutes) Rnilraad Quiei Zane Discussionllnformatic,n
4. Mikr l'0111101V (1) rvi[iulcs) 5ip
n l:udr i_fpciate Discu:,sion, lnformation
5. e'ary priskell (I(1 minntcs) Pr1'Perty titaintcnan.r t_'adr Upcit►te Uiscussion/[nforniation
6. Cety Driskel) (15 minutcs) Drnft Ordinance Rcgul:tiing Use of City Logo Uiscussion JInCotmation
7. Tam Schaltens (10 minutrs) H:u.;ird (mwntrry Annlysis Report Disc.u.tii.m +'Inforrnution
8, Dave Men;ier (15 minutrs) i'roposed Pticinct 13uilding Purchase f)ixussion!Information
Muyar Wilhita (20 minutes) Cauncil Budget Itcros DiscussiutJInfotmatiurti
10. Mstyor R'ilhitc Adviincr :1s,►enda Additiorn; Discussionnnfc+rmati:tin
/1 lnfvrmation Only Item- (:nnlerting Brurxl►vay t0 77rrer Lunes
1' lirjurmatinn Un1Y Jtenr: Nr•arft:g Eramhtcr Agreemant Jl,fodiftcuJfort
13, Ma}•or Wiihite Caunci( Check in Discussionllnfonnation
1 1. Dave Ntercier ('itv N113siagcr Comrnciils Discussi(ln;'(iifi)rniatikin
Norr: l'nless ntherwise aoted dbove, thcre wiil bc no puNlic cummenb rf Cauncil Study tie+sions. llonrscr, f'ouncil olwv}Irescrvex
tfic right to roquat informxtion fram thc pndlk rnd itaRu rppruprlate.
NUTiCE: h►dfvidw►!x plmming ro amrnd the meeting wlxi rcgurn 2ecia! midance tn scaanmochtr ph;zicml, harin ar tithrr Impuimten2t, plcrc crrntuGt
thc t V:y C.-Icr1~c n~ t1i11i1 v`1-I ihlp a~ ~cUtt i, ~rus5ihlc :u :1:~1 u:cw~acn~c:.iU ma~ ho m~„c
Study Sntium Ae.md.i
~ CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 2, 2006 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ~ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2007 - 2012 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) UpdatE and
. 2007 Annual Construction Program ~
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77,010, Perpetual advanced six-year plans for :
coordinated transportation program expenditures.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adopted 2006-2011 Six Year TIP last year on June
8, 2004, Resolution #05-009. Adopted Amended 2006 TIP on April 25, 2006, Resolution #06-
007.
BACKGROUND: The City is required by RCW 35.77.010 to prepare and after public _
hearing adopt a revised and extended comprehensive transportation program for the ensuing
six calendar years. This plan must be submitted to the Washington State Secretary of
~ Transportation before July 15t of each year. The proposed 2007 - 2012 Six Year TIP represents an update to the 2007-2012 adopted Six .
Year TIP prepared last year. . .
Proposed changes from last year's TIP include: ' ' -
• The following rescheduled Projects: . o Broadway Avenue Inlay, (I-90 to Park Road) .
o Montgomery Inlay, (Argonne Road to University Road)
o Park Rd/Bridging the Valley, BNSF Grade Separation
o Park Road Project #2, (Broadway Avenue to Indiana Avenue) ,
o University Inlay #1, (Dishman-Mica Road to 16'hAvenue) : o University Inlay #2, (16th Avenue to 4t'Avenue) . ~
o Park Road #3, (Sprague Avenue to 6roadway Avenue) . . :
0 0 Avenue Reconstruction, (Havana Road to Par1c Road) o Barker Road, (Appleway Avenue to Broadway Avenue) ;
. o Barker Road, (8th Avenue to Appleway Avenue)-
o Flora Road, (Sprague Avenue to Mission Avenue)
o Barker'Road, (Spokane River to Trent Avenue1SR290) .
O o Bowdish Road, (8'" Avenue to 32nd Avenue) o Evergreen Road, (16'' Avenue to 32"d Avenue)
o Valley Corridor Project #3, (Evergreen Road to Tschirley Road) ' .
s .
o Bar{cer Road, (32"d Avenue to 8'" Avenue) City Partnering with Spokane Gounty
• The Folloaring Modified Projects:
o Park Road #3, (Sprague Avenue to Broadway Avenue), Separated into PE Only
and-CN phases •
o Barker Road, (Sprague Avenue to Laberry Avenue , Combined with Barker, (St'
Avenue to Sprague Avenue) Project -
. o Barker Road,,(8~' Avenue to Sprague Avenue), Combined with Barker (Sprague
• Avenue to Laberry Avenue) Project
o Valley Corridor Project #3, (Evergreen Road to Tschirley Road), Separated into . PE Only and CN phases
• The Following Added Projects: .
o Broadway Avenue Safety Study, (I-90 to Sullivan Road)
o Signal Controller Upgrades, (Various Locations) .
. o Sullivan Road Concrete Reconstruction, (Mission Avenue to I-90)
0 44t" Avenue Pathway, (Woodruff Road to Sands Road)
o Argonne Knox Intersection Improvements '
o Pines Corridor ITS (Trent/SR290 to 1601) .l
- f
o Argonne Road Northbound Right Turn Lane (@ Montgornery)
`J o Sprague/Conklin Intersection Traffic Signal '
o Mission Avenue Reconstruction, (Flora Road to Barker Road) o Broadway Ave, (Moore Road to Flora Road) o Broadway Ave Extension, (Flora Road to Barker Road)
o Saltese/Sullivan Intersection Improvements
o Camahan Road Truck Lane, (8t' Avenue to City Limits) .
o SR27 Pedestrian Crossing (@ 24'")
o SR27/Pines/16th Intersection Improvements The Public Hearing for the TIP is scheduled for the May 23`d, 2006 Council Meeting.
OPTIONS: Accept or revise project list and/or project schedule ,
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Provide feedback and direction to staff.
BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS; The proposed 2007-2012 TIP projects.will be budgeted
within the Street Capital Projects Fund, which has the revenue resources to accommodate the
proposed TIP projects through 2010. At the current level of projecied revenues not all projects
in years 2011 and 2012 can be funded at this time. Staff will confinue to re-evaluate the
projects in these later years as we continue to prepare future TIPs. It is important, however, to
~ have these projects in.the TIP even if funding is not currently projected because most funding
sources require projects to be in our plan.
STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten, Public Works Director;
Steve Wodey, Senior Engineer - Capital Projects
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Summary description of proposed projects .
2) List of Draft 2007-2012 Six Year TIP projects .
3) Draft 2007-2012 Six Year TIP, 2007 Annual Construction Program
4) Map of Draft 2007-2012 Six Year TIP
O O
S06Kane .
Va11e
y
11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane ~ Valley WA 99206
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008.♦ cityhallCspokanevalley.org
' 0. ' _ ■i. 7 ' _.1
City of Spokane Valley
. 2007-2012 SiY-year Transportation Improvement Program
Praject DESCriptions
.1. APpleway Btvd. •
Reconstnzct Applcway Blvd. to five lanes with curbs and sidewalks from
. Tschirley Road to Hodgcs Road. Cost $3,200,000. City share $433,000..
2. Barker Tioad Bridge T'h.is project will reconstruct the Barker Road Bridge over the Spokane R.iver.
`Viden.i.ng of this bridge is needed due to increased traffic volumes. 1 ederal
-Bridge Replacemeat Crraut funds covering 100"/0 of the project cost was
received in 2004. Total Project Cost: $$,100;000. Ciry share: $0.
~ 3. PineslMansfield Project
This is a joiut project behveen the City, thc Washington 17cpt. of
Transportation, the Transportazion Improvement Board, the Federal Highvvay
.Administration, and private developers. It v~7ll move the signal at wescbound
on- and off-ramps to the Mansfield Intersection reducing congestion on Pines
Road. The project wrill reconstruct the westbound on-ramp aligni.ng it Nvith
1.ndiana to the ea.st. This will close the access to Vlontgomery Road, which
. Nvill end in a cul-de-sac. The westbound off-ramp Nvill be conuected to Itidiana
Avenue. Constructioii is scheduled for 2007. Cost $4;530;000. City sharc
$55,000.
_ 4. Sullivan I7aad Nortta Extension (Bigelow Gulch) .
Lxtend Sullivan Road north of Wellesley Avenue to the City limit with a5-
lane arterial. This project is as a part of the Spokane County's Bigelow Gulch
Road prpject and will be constructed by Spakane County. Total City share:
$60,000.
5. Valley Corridor- Pruject 2 Extend Appleway 131vd. East from Univcrsity Road to Evergreen Road. This
will likely be a 3-lane urhan arterial Arith sidewalks and bike lanes. This
project is partially funded -,Aith $4.2 m.illion in federal S1P(l.J) grant ftulds
secured from SRTC. WSI70'1 has will fund half the cost of the Pines Road/Appleway Blvd. concrete intersection and signals. Additional funds will
~ . be sought to cover the remaining project budget. PE scheduled to begin in
~ • .
2006 writh RlW and construction in 2007, 2008 and 2009. Total pmject cost:
$14,092,000. City shaze: $589,000. )
6. Broadway Avenue Inlay
Grind thc existing pavcment and ovcrlay,%Nrith asphalt concrete from I-90 EB
on-ramp to Park Road. Cost: $305,000 City Cost: $ 41;000.
7. Montgomery ltoad Inlay 2
Grind the existing paveuient and overlay Arith asphalt concrete from Argonne
Rodd to University Road. Cost $497,000. City Share: $0.
8. Bruadway Avenue Safety Study
This project is to develop a traffic plan that studies alternatives to reducing
accidents along the Broaciway Corridor. Cost: $50,000. City sliare: $50,000.
9. Park Road Grade Separation -Bridging the Valley
This project is part of the Bridging the Valley program and will construct a
bridge to allow velucle traffic over the BNSr tracks at Trent Avenue. A
Freiglit Mobility Strategic Investment Board (FMSIB) grant for $5 mullion
was received for this project. We anticipate additional funding support f.rom
the BNSF, TIB, Fcderal grants, and possibly `VSDOT. Cost: $16S million.
City share: $695,000
10. Park Road - Project 2
This project would reconstruct Park- Road from Broadway Avenue to Indiana _ --Avenue. This will be a fivc-lane arterial Aith curbs and sideNuall:s linki.ng
Broadway Avenuc to the new overpass al the 13NSF tracks and Trent Avenue.
Cost: $ 3,658,000 City cost: $731;000.
l.i. Park Roaci - Project 3(PE funds only)
This project proposes to rcconstruct Park Road from Sprague Avenue to Broadway Avenue lo a thrce-lane sfiandard street. This includes replacing the
railroad bridge just north of Sprague Avenue. Cnst: $594,000 Citycost:
$50,000. .
12. Signal Controller Upgrades
. This project Nvill replace all outdated signal controllers with modern
controllers throughout the ciry to be compatible with ihe Spokane Regional
Transportation Management System. Cost: $400,000. City share: $54,000.
. ,13. Sullivan Road PCC
This project Nvill replace the rutted asphalt pavement Nvith Porlland Ceinent
Concrete pavemeni betwcen Mission Avenue and the westbound 1-90 on/off
ramps. This will be combined with WST)OT's project to conerete Sullivan
Road over I-90 betAveEn the eastbound and westbound ramps. Cost: $450,000.
City share: $450,000.
14. Sullivan Road West Bridge
Reconstruct the west bridge over the Spokane River. Th.is bridge would «riden
to accommodate traffic turning west onto Indiana Avenue. Cost $8,000,000.
City share $0.
15. Univcrsity Road Ialay 1
Grind the existing pavement and overlay with asphAlt concrete from Dislunan-
Mica Road to 15 Avenue. Cost: $809,000 City Cost: $ 109,000.
lfi. University Road Tnlay 2'
Grind the existing pavement and overlay --A2t11 asphalt concrete from 15
Avenue to 4`!' Avenue. Cost: $422,000 City Cost: S 57,000.
17. 44`h Avenue Pathway
Construct a 10 foot ~v7de multi-use pathwa}~ on the north side of 44t1' Avenuc
in the Ponderosa area between Sands Road and Woodruff Road. Cost:
$209,000. City share: $28,000. 18. 8t6 Avenue Reconstruction
This project will widcn 8`h Avenuc from Havana to Park Road to an urban 3-
lane section w7th curb; gutter, sidewalks and bike lanes. Total project cost:
~ $5,$37,000. City share: $787,000.
19. Argonne/Knox Intersection rmprovements
Upgrade intersection vvith new signal poles and enlarge curb radii to
accommodate tunung truck h-affic. Cost: $436,000. City share: $58,000.
20. Barker Road - Appleway Avenue to Broadway Avenue
Reconstruct Barker FZoad to a fve-lane section writh center turn lane from
Appleway Avenue to Broadway Avenue. Cost: $2,213,000. City share:
$442,000.
21.. ArgonaelMontgomery iNBR (narthbound right) Turn Lane
Construct a right turn lane for narthbound trafrc at the Argonne/Montgomery
i.ntersection. Cost: $205,000. City share: $27;000.
22. Pines Corridor ITS (Intelligent Transportation System)
install conduit and fiber optic cabling to connect all traffic signals behveen
16'h Avenue and Trenl Avenue to the Sgokane Regional Transportation
A7anagement Center (SRTMC). Tlus Nvill improve si;nal coardination and
ti.ming and allow changes during peak hours and/or emergency cvcnts. Cost:
S133,000. City share: $18,000. ~~J
23. 32°d Avenue - SR 27 to Best Road
Recoastruct 32°° Avenue from SR 27 to Best IZoad (City limits). Tbis road '
would be a three-lane arterial with curbs and sidewalks connecting to a County project at Best Road that will conti.nue the improvement to Sullivan
Road. Cost: $1,812,000 City cost: S245,000.
24. Barkcr Road - 8`h to Appleway
Reconstruct the roadway to a three-lane urban arterial from 8th Avenue to
Appleway Blvd. Cosl: $2,878;000 Cost: $576,000.
25. Flora Road
This project will construct Flora Road to a three-lane arterial section from
Sprague Avenue to Missiou Avenue. Cost: $2,820,000. City share: $564,000.
26. Park Road - Project 3(CN)
This project proposes to reconstruct Park Rodd from Sprague Avenue to
. Broadway Avenuc to a three-lane standard street. This includes replacing the
railroad bridge just north of Sprague Avcnue. Cost: $5,$45,000 Citycost:
$497;000.
27. Sprague/Coaklin Signal Construct traffic sigual system at the intersection of Sprague Avenue and
Conklin Road. Cost: $300,000. City share: $180,000.
~
28. Euclid Avenue/Flora Road - -
Tlus project is proposed to reconstruct a.nd providc a 3-lane, shoulderod
arterial on Euclid Avcriue from Flora Road to Bazker Road and nn Flora 17oad
f.rom F-uclid Road on the west to Euclid Road on the east. Cost: $3,861,000
City cost: $521,000.
29. Mission Avenue Reconstruction
keconstruct Mission Avenue to a 3-lane urban arterial from Flora Road to
Bazker Road. Cost: $3,162,000. City share: $633,000.
30. Sullivan Road Reconstruction
Reconstruct to seven lanes from Euclid Avenue to Wellesley Avcnue. This
will be in coordiuation with the Nvidening of bridges at tbe BNSN and SR 290
(Trent) as part of the Bridgi.ng thc Valley Froject. Cost: $4,079,000 City
cost: $816,000.
31. Valley Corridor - Project 3(PE funds only)
Extend Appleway Blvd east from Evergreen Road to Tschirley Road. This
will be the same width a.nd number of lanes as the proposed extEnsion of
Appleway Blvd. bettveen University and Evergreen. This project will completc the Valley Corridor Project. Praject cost: $667,000. City share:
$90,000. ~
, i
32. Barker Road - Spokane River to Trent
Reconstruct Barker Road from the Spokane River Bridgc to Trent Avenue. .
The section will be LhrEC lanes widc Azth a centcr turn lanc, curbs and-
sidcwalk. Th.is will be coordinated Arith the Bazker Road Overpass which is
parl of thc Bridging thc Valley Project. Cost: $3,920,000. City share:
$529,000.
33. Bowdish Road .
Construct a th.ree-lane urban arterial with curbs and sidewalks from 32°d
Avenue to 8th Avenuc. Cost approximately $4,431,000. City share $887,000.
34. Rroadway Avenue - Flora to Barker
Construct a 3-lane urban arterial from Flora Road to Barker Road with curbs,
gutters, and sidwalks. Cost: $2,870,000. City share: $574,000.
35. Broadway Avenue - Moore to Flora
Rcconstruct and widen Broadway AvEnue to a 3-lane section, 180 feet E. of
Moore Roaei to Nlora Road. Cost: $2,198,000. City share: $440,000.
36. Evergrcen Road
Reconstruct EvergrEen Road from 32°a Avenue ta 16`h Avenue to a three-lane
~ urban section. Cost $3,065,000. City sbare $613,000.
38. SalteseJSultivan Signal
Install traffic signal at the intersection of Saltese Road and Sullivan Road.
Tlus vvill be in coordination vvith Spokane Counry. Cost: $305,000. City
share: $77,000. 39. Valiey Corridor - Project 3(C1V)
Extcnd Appleway Blvd east from Fvergreen Road to Tschxrley Road. This
will be tlie same width and nunlber of lanes as the proposed 'extension of
Appleway Blvci. beriveen University anci Evergreen (Project 2). This project
will complete the Valley Corridor Project. Project eost: $10,174;000. City
share: $874,000.
40. Carnahdn Truck Lane
Construct a southbound truck lane on Carnahan Road from 8d' Avenue to City
limits. Cast: $2,254,000. City share: $305,000.
41. SR 27 Pedestrian Crnssing Construct a pedestrian bridge across SR27 at 24Avenue. Cost: $2,250,000.
' City sha,re: $450;000.
~ 42. SR 27/Pines/16th Interscction
improve intersection for northbound and southbound traffic on Pincs Road.
Cost: $2,701,000. City share: $540,000.
. ~
43. Street PreservaHon Projects
Annual strcet preservation projects on various streets throughout the city.
Cost: $7,599,000. City share: $7,599,000.
44. Barker Road Recoastruction This project is in partnersh.ip Arith Sgakane County. Spokane County
proposes to rcconstruct F3arker Road from 8`h AvEnue to 32"d Avenue. The
city's portion of this project will be to participate in the construction of a 3-
lane urban arterial from 8`h Avenue to the city limits. Cost $40,000. City
share $40,000.
. /
~
iv of 5pokane Valley
rtmcnt of Pnb1Lr Wo[fo
. _ ~ ; , ~~~>rtntjon Improvement Aroqram DRAFT
;00T - 2012
,tao 1q t~+o~a~rotl~l
X ilrpJm I[m 1tl PtfQltly S00[Cr Cily Aaw1Qd Amt:JLt
-aPr~+r stis Tod*fhr Aaad Nodqss Raad S7P(Lq t05 C Spoimne fbvar t6503 BR s.er.
Wftx Rosd P1nes RaaO CMIW Zp t os
Pknes 6 hrilans 1Mest Dourd on rsrrp
A ~-ill!•Y R3~„" h71h ~rfi~V7n FY~lfn:n :,,Y?.I WV6jN"wY City LYl1ft "v 1 " J119/y C.Offl00C' PtqoGt 2 V(I/V0Q1ih1 Rd EYergreen Rd STPtM 409 3..'.',h
UnNersly Rd Evsrgnm Rd
5 r, I-00 EB ramp ParR RaW STA(P) ♦1
T •~a,-•~ : -r, = Atponne Raas UnNe" lio0d CDB4 <r.r
o &a.a.oy Arwr so" ~i 1DD Sudlvart cRy 50
a _ . - • . • - - froftna Avanue MmWwwtyAvn STP 32
19 81OOdM" Av Indiim Av UAP 113 ^r~ r
11 STP(U) 26
12 SWu[ Cowonw upqram CMAO 54 e.•~r~
12 SuNNW i!o fCC Msslon IDD E8 Rampe STPM gt aN i
14 Suo.an Ra.o wrw a +yp a Sppltwv RNr I4611 S 9R aar,
15 .=..~:1-r-sa,ns• DiihrtgtMAlCiflCOd tSCtAvw1u0 STP" U 9t
,e 150 Aven,e 4thAremis STP(F) 4
43 etrsa P.a~riadian Ptqe~ CM 1000 ~
u 32lId AUs CIlY IO 4:
20.17
h-Aa 6010 b himwr swrm tsod n.om Ajxk---u; ,
. ~x na.e snao. ~ svoRxN Rlver I55o0 eit
a SAnw 3aw ++octn Emoruion (Mpwo. GnsI1Yelleelay Cib LJmb C!!Y 64
R v.S.f caniaor - p►v1•d 7 UNrwnpy Rd Evarpnen Rd STP(l1) 37
UrtlveWN Rd Everprew RQ
- - ~ • . = ° r ~ . ~ r " . ~ Indiani AvlfriA 610n1QQnaTy /1V! STP pl
a - : ~ • : 6+nstlomy Av IMluv Av UAP 140 ±a-
! t ' a» a_ s2 Ff -ny STPM 25
14 9►dNvr+ RmC WtN &idp Cl Spok" Rnar f451 t S 8R 1"e =
+s . ~ = • DsAmen•Allka Raad 151h Avanus STPO ps .
15tlt AvenuO Ith Avanus STPIPI St a~ -
~ r aM Av& Pw%" WnoOruR Sands 5TP(E) 29 ~
~ e tr FUvaru SIIrx! Park Rdad s?PM 124 oI:
' D A.Vonti! -*OS 1 t14q~RUn (0 Kf100it CflAAO 6
:0 =rr ' aJ :7-- ..ar ~ _ :r_s. ' . qpaqwy BrobMfsyAvrltN UAP 84 : t Aipor"wLOrnq:swry NaR Tue++ uro AMwyOpnwY CMAA S
tnL-i Aw Trant Avo CMA0 18
4) :rwn : . _.~-.c'l_,• f •1
Cdy 1359
?:uJC~ ta uiJ tuncCrwnes ulwutirJ w eLe Tii' are f,i ~r- cuaculemi eU;tmnj es c-nf}i tt nr may chnnre due :n ut :ur:zv ;i i:ir.umStances, nn.7 urc r,ut
ieceedad by t6a Cfty m be rdied uyua DY Prote'y owners ac deveiopu9 ia maicin; cievsiopmmf doeisKn„
h
6': ti Df-06
Cit}' of Spokunc VaUey
I)rpartment of Publjc Works T~
Si=-Year 'f raaspartetion Improvtment Proaram i ~ _ , F k
2007 - 2012
(owrm In euouawidal
lian r ~m~ea 5vm to ?diny 5ouru Ciry Amrxzid AmouR
5 Ywr c.or+aQ - v-4w: Unirerslly Rd Evcrpreer+ Rd sTVM y Vgs"
Umverslty Rd Everpnean Rd
a _ . - •~,tncriana Rvenus Morttqanery Ava. 57'P 257 5_e11
, ~ . • _ ~ - . Hrvadwey Rv uKane Av UAP 478
IA 5umowit+oaa weoBrwp~ Q 6poASnQ RYrsr 04611-3 SR
,s ►iavanm Slrmt Pavfcftcad STP(u) 3m > ..aore+e - Kraa ers~cecn a Kna: Cmon S2 ~
AppleMfAy BrpsdYWyA1Mf1LQ l" zx
AEDwr4MwaVorwY V1111 Ttrn une a MOQivOf7lDfy GUAQ 22 15J
rniaAvrti. SR 27 Sesi iiaiaa sTPN) 38 =B'
gth Applawvy Ave UCP 68 239
5~•n =c~: . .
Sprapua Av Mfubn Av UCP BO 4n:
:a - ' . - - SRaqus Awnus Broadwa/ Avenue STP(U) 31 4C '
sws" • carkm SuWr ~ Conklin CAY
43 Ser..t r-*9W'.Vjan CiM 1300 ~.~r.
3,•0e 23.445
Itm: d pm~aa fr.xn Iu f'rwocy Suucre Cny Amaxm~ MLnual
r_ _ - ; • , . Y - d w o Avmue Mmtqornuy Ava 51P 2 97 e e i i
14 Suui.m ~e ww Bndpe a Spokane Rivr 04611 S BR 757
,e . . , 4 _ . - M:rana Stns! Parsi iiw0 STP(U) SOJ 2,246
,a • - . _ . : - APPIVAW BrtsDway Avenue l1AP 154 71'
_3 Ura Aw,w SR 27 Best Raae STf'(U) 4e a='
14 : , • 4 . _ ECi ApqlewiY Ave UCP 90 'D°
Sprigte Av 1Astia+ Av UGP 257 1.294
Sprpue Avenua Broadwey Avenw STP(U) 238 2-712
~
_e Eudld Avw F1on fi0 Fiora RoaC BartLer Roatl STP(ll? 45
Esrdkf Rood Eydld RoaO
; o Ataum Aw R*csarucuon Fbt1 Bs1ke► UAP 97 a]e
30 8wnna+ aa.e Rsransnaan Eudia Avenue Wetlestsy Avenue IJCP ga zs:
31 . : - - - . - = ~ Evwgrnen Appls+vsy 57PM 90 887
Evergreen APP1--f'
43 sr..cPr..vw+la,Prol.o CMy e540 1,540
~.1~] 18_651
~J;~
ltsi A projed itm t0 Pnmry Soureo CEy Amo= Aiarnmt
n aa,s Av.+w SR ri Beat Road STP(U) 160 i i nc
:a • _ . . . . . gth Appbaursy Ave. UGP 428 2. ; 3.5
- Sprsgue Av Mlsslon Av UGP 227 1.134
$prspue AvMUe Broadrwy Avenua $TP(U) 227 2,57l
: x eudw AvW Flw, Ra Fbra Road Aarlca Roed STP(ll) 68 501
EirJ1d Road Eudld Rwd
'_'fl Lq"tmO11AYe R!]o'7[iLcYI Fbfa BariClf L&AP 236 1430
3e eulan Rooe Rswrnsnctbn Eudid Avenuu Welle4ley Avenua UCi' 21$ 1300
12 Spokane RNer Trent Avenue STP(U1 38 :"..a
33 : 1 ' = 32nd Avaix.e 9Jt Avenue STP(LJ) gS °=s
:a lrn.:o..y Ara • Flam m a.mw Flaa Battcet UAP 52 y.
,,S 3uiOw" Ars Mo'Jr1 b FIOrf 1e0 n E a Moore Flaa UAP 59
» : ; =-L= SZtOAverwe 18tn/lvmue UAP 53 -5'
33 San....su0van 5ynr Q Sa,INran Rd oeer 77 3X
~p ~ , - - - Evar7cen RoaO AppIeNS+y Road UCP 350 75)
+63 StaetIrnr•, !tClty 12M 1.:97
3 516 13,8114
:'r•!jr.t9 ¢nd t:mciramea idaifilieJ en tbc FIi' are t.~ be cuusulac.i rSxtRia'evinli th:it ~t~ny ~tLwic duc W a~a;~ery ni';irce;tnr,~cx, an3 nrr ~ot
,-strnded by the Ciry to be ratiod aPon bY iwOcnY awnan cw Sevelupers in making dcvaiopmcnt dxisww_
F::ndea vr~~e~ca a~ced P-Cjec?5 ? 26-Apr-06
I
Cicy or Spokaac !'attcy
Departmeot otPublic Worics
tiix-Ycar 'rmnxportation Improvcrnent 1'rogrum 1
2007 - 2012
(00111u. m eewaswwal
12
liao M hoytd finm k7 iR=wy '%'%ttc: L¢y Amxur ,~rrt~um:
; e EuW Av.r Flon Re Ftora RooO BarW Rad STF'(I.) 40! a o<~
Eudld Road Eudid Road
29 Mmoors A+w wAmnsiumw Fiora Barkew UAP 258 r~ee
3o Szilvw itaw Neawwarvdlen Eudid Avenue VVNeeqt Avoncs UCP S~4 2,
, w - , • - SpokaneRiw TrontAwnae STP(U) 35
33 :-mr g2ndAvMtUe ft AMer►ue STP(U) 91
7+ OrodrM Ave - f1aa a HrRw FIOrd BNkOf LIAP SO '15L
,c gropu.r Ave Moors m F4xa 180 A E O( MOOm FIDn UAP 4e 7an
V. J?ndAverwe iDU+Averaw UAi' EO 4x
aa Ever9r"~ RpW Appleway ROid l1CP 437 SDo'
.o (-.+nrun Tn,oc une em Gy umns S7P(u) 27 aoo
4 1 iR 17 Padammn Crowny @ 241l1 Ave OIlw 3E
4: sU;,rW,.W+ftnno,.~ la iea, a sRZr una ag ~
~l =rne! ~•s:e ~:n ^-~~rn CRy 1200 ' Z00
3 286 15.BBt
~
f`tnj::ts atul nmettymeti ufrn;ititd in ihc fli' uc tu bc cucmr;fazd cntimaics ooly thal mu} chnngt Aix rn a vaJiety nf ci7rumoancr', and r:r ncN
tnteadai by ebe City to bo rdiod upwn by pruperty owoen or dcwdcK►ery ro makmS dercioptnmt do::nfnns.
=-nde-dFrp;9Ci5 l+dd@d PlDjBL't9 - - . - 3 26'A"
4 V y~, l y~
1 5 ~r-~J
rL=
~ w
CD
UF's cm
IT.
~
C7 qi ~ C3
LL. LL
r 1 _ ~ LI
;~,'4 'J~~`'~~
va~ W"q t e*1
~ ~~~fsly ~ ~ ' . r~ ~ ~fFJ ~l~5~~~ ~ ~ ~
~i
- 3
I r y, -
wL
~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ • ~ m ~ ~r ' ~ -~4L ~ ~ ~
~ ~
= ~ oc
e ~ r ~ ' ~ + Iu~.~ J ~ , ~x m. ~ ~ y~} •,f ~
+ur~' ~ ~ - A• -
, .
f'T ~
/t,~
' ~ '_~f ~ - I ` Y~. ~~~i~.l ~ , ,~"~,4`•rR°~~`~~ ~ 4 ~
ii-u- +6iu
L4.Y7 ,
19 wir ~
~ ~5 ~ ,t ~ _ ~~~ml'; w ~ t _ ~ ~ ~
_ Fe- , ~ ~ ~ ~ , , ,S~ ~t ~ ` ~
~ . e. ~
.,_~,j 1J~~
a~s,,;i,~+i r •u,. M, S7 ~Pe' M4 L,
~w.-
. ~ ~!Tlll ~ F} F •'F ~ ~ 7 ~
~
lb n~
S~~rw,~m ~ r- Ab_ ~."iFli~ f'_~"~-~`= e i~ii~~qlrk~ E~p. %*L-j.!
; nrA y ~ ^i{
4i ~ ~ ~ I: eai~ - i, Y - '~S F;Y7.. I , •5. .al ~~`i'-"'t I.~f.~
~1
. - ~ - - 71 , 1 i` ~`~__F ,N~•~~s i ~~._q~ I
j ,1`r~ p~p :f ~ ~"~fR•
kl. : xF
1i4K1# r' - I ! [ ,e - I I1~ ` f`~ _ . el
I L _ y
4~ ~ ~v{ryry Y~
`e ~k i AI^~I@°~I 4 #7 6u"~"""~ L
~
1 171~~
_ ffffla6
. . ~ . - ~ ~ .
....L ~ ~y~"s~ ~ ~ ~ i . ~ 1 ' ~4 .o ~ ~y I7N.~ Pa~ _y, I T i '.;M „
iL--
Ld"q ~ ~
Xx~~~'~J ~ y ~ I~H] w ~.I ~ ~
~ ~ I•,fh ~al1y ~~"1 ~C .,i ~~TF• ~-1 ~;~"~~%~I
. ~ .
~
~
~fli
` ~ IT
~ : ~ - -
~'~M+W.yU Jor.l ~ •t.s'+"'A~`. "~b.'~~ '1ti}~ 4~V. ~ - I I A~~ _ ~a . ~ _ ~ - ~ ~~k ~
Ninan Ii CI
~
t
t
.
_ w
~ h qn
;i
II r -
Wi ~ _ d . ~ . .
.~..W r . ~ ~
_ . i + ~ ' r .
F41ae~
4 + oii
. . ' r • . - '
- . ~ .
. . }+t_ ' Y ' S`~~~ ~ ' •
• i
. - ;
PRY ~~oka ne Valley,
~ ~ . Depa rtr.rio'nt df P u b lic 1Norks
Draf~
~ ~~OT- 2 0 12 S ix Yea'r° Tra ns r~
por~at~~on I.pr. ovement Program
;.I... . .
~ . . ~ 2~~:~ Ar~aJ Construct-ibn Prog ram
. r
- ~ GLOSSARY A N D ABBREVIATEONS
Functlonal Classificatron= RuraL Funding9au rccs: ,
7 Majar ColWor. _ B Minar Colleotor Fedcral assistanoe:'[hese fiunds-aro aulharized underthe
9 Acc.esa ° 5afe, Amauq~~bleFlgaa~,re; Effiefeht, Transpo~on Equlty Vrban~~ ' AL ~ LegucCy.for llsers (SAFEfEA-LU) and are admin6-tered
14 Principa! . `,by~lhe,~ederal HigMvayAdmrn~--tretivn throEo !he ' -
' ifi Minor • 4Yash1n9tori StaEe I]epartinent of 7ransparfiafion and [ho 17 Collectar ' 3pai€ane Keg ianeJ TranspartaUon 'Counxil {3RTC}_ 1~i LocalAocvas . . .
BR - BrfdgA ReplacerrmipraJec~s
CMAQ-Con9esi~an MaoagementlAirQvafty O!Der Fed - Qther federal tureds:
SlF - Surtace Transpartafion Program. Individus7 funds are
deslgrmted by fhe letlefs in par'enfhe3is thatfallow the irlitials .~F?._ .
STP{U} kJibarl iznprowernenEs .
, STP(Fi) Rural impmvements . S7F(G) ComaeMi ve runding STP(E) FnhancementonprovomenP °
9TP(S) SaFeiy improvemenis
, ' -,h • ~ _ 4 . .
F State a5sista nco: kJCP. UA2, and SP sre acFminis[ered by .
tht~ Tra,rspprtatian Irropmvemerlk Baard. ~.a ~i • . ' IJCP - IJr4an,Corridor Ar"ram - {Formeriy TranspOrtation Parfneashfp Prograrri '(TFP}) Y
. UAP - Urban Arberlal Pro#am
{Fornl9dy ArEeriaf ImproverneW Prograrn (AAP)
~jp - $icrewalk Program
"~'i~ . • - ~ . ' . - i..: ° ~ ~ - f : ~ r- - [~arnerFy Pedestrien 3af~iy W7abiliEy PrOgtarn
(PS~.7P}~ ~
Cr=Ft6 -Commun[iy rtranvmiv Revitafizatlon Board .
09Jie~5ti~:Otherstala funds ~ ~
RxM1~. ra
CoBG Cammurtiiy deveGopm:.nt Block Grank . i
Draft - 2007- 2012 FEearingData: 61132006 A"10,WIX
~0~~~ ; - Emo. As~s... Dae Rcsohitlon No.:
~~e Six-Year Transportation- Improvement Program
Y ,DOWirs fn Urousanus
• Proj'ccV R4ad Names! Descti tioN.Current Status Funding
p Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2007 2006 2009 2010 2611 2012 'fotal
1 Applew~ay Blvd. . 0 0 777, 777 CJty 105 ~ 105
Appieerty Blvd. Tschtrley f2oad Hodges Road 1.26 ST'(U) 672 672
Rsamstrud fo a ftve4ane urhan arteffal -
. .
Dasigning & H21 purnhase rIgAt-oS-v+ay PmJect Tatsl 777 777
2 6arkcr Raad Sridge ' 0 0 7,350 7,350 8R 3,875 3,675 7,351)
Qar)cer Road Q Spo:tano River #5503 0.10
fteptaoe biidga ovct the Spokano River.
, . W----- .
DesfignSng 8 vnli purchase right-0Piuay . project Totai 3,675 3,675 7,350
, • .
~ 3 PinesllAansf2ld 0 - 0 1,018 1,018 GIj 29 ' 29
Manstield Ava WFTour Road Pines Road 0.39 CUAQ 341 341
~ Pinos Rd Phies & lndane VMest bound on rsmp 1 , other 434 ~ 434
Thia proJed %+eI rewnfiQm tha Wf3 r.mips ot IAO ot SR27. It waabo ahcr Stem. 14 14
• ititden end reoonstruct Mensflcltl Ava. fram N~iibur Rd, to SR27 to a 34ane UCP 200" ~ 200
foatlYray Hifh curb, gutter end sidevoiGc. •
-
Desigrting ` PcojcdToral 1,018 1.018
Projects and Ihnefr.,mes tdcn8fled in NC TiP are Fo 0a con ;tctamd aslirmNa only that nrjy chaNe o due W a v.^:ifcty ad dreinIslnnces, ~ ' •
and ara ifrit idcnded by ttee Gly to bo relkC upom by pro,perry wmm ordevelo{aers 6n rnaking tlevelnµmcnt dectsfan,, '
eizWzooc ' a r
Draft 2007- - 2012 "eaft °S1a: &"W20°6 "dop41on °a`e:
s**~' . r~v. Asasse. os!s ftesoa,uo„ ko~
PO1Te 1~ Six YearTransporEation improvement Proqram.
' ~~/s~' ■Q,1Jl.y DnAawlnthausarct,
• ~ Ci
Fundin9
, ProjecU Road NamesJ Dcscriptionl Curront Status Length PE RW CN Total Sources • 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
4 SUlfivan Raad North Exlcnsion (Biget(w Gutch) 0 7 54 55 CitY 1 Sk 55
SullivAn Rd VJadesley Gity Ltm1L, 0.25
RcoonsWd and widen 1Re Suttivan Road cadens(on nortA also knven as
8ige4o'w Gtdfi Road tp a Mane rnadvvay wf[h 6-faot shouldets and a 12- •
toot roro wsry ICft tum lane.
Project Total 1 54
Sceldng fin►dtng
Val[ey CortfCor - Profed 2 702 3,318 9,896 13,918 CERe 1,790 1,$60 3,650
2nd Avenuo Univesity Rd Evergreen Rd 202 C61Y 469 37 1. ' 507
Sprague Ave ' Unhreuz tty Rd Evergreen Rd 2.42 Ouwr 1,610 403 2.413
Ddac~ Applv~ray Slvd. vAih n mutti-larua faplity Induding arbs and • Ogw Fed 1,000 1,000
sidatraRcs. Resurfaw Sprogue Avenuo and resbipe. oser SWta. 8 276 184 458 - -
• s7PM 1,289 2.076 1,233 4,578
UCP 1,020 680 ' ' 1,700 _
,
17ofng emironmefltal study Proptlraai 3.356 6,602 3,858 ' 13,918
8 Broadway Avcnuo Inlay 31 0 274 305 aiy 41 • 41
Broaztv2y Aventso 640 EB wp Park Road 0.34 STPlPl 264 284
Gri»d and Intay with 2 6ndies of asphelt corscrcW pavemeM . .
:
Destgnitig Project TotnI 305 ' 3OS
. .
farojects and itme2arne.^, 6dcMiflal ln ihe TIP aro to be oaiutdcred esllnwOC . ontf thag may enangc duc fo a%aslety ot ciseurtutancM.
and era nol irdandcd by Ihe Cily to bo mllod upwt by propeiry o,vncrs or Cgrelopers in ma0dng de•reiogiioint dcciarans. .
417 az : . '
• - - .
. . .
Draft 2007- 2012 ~aring oe-a en30036 adoD110n Data
S O~ - erv. A•.:eas. Date Rasolibion NO.:
~v.~.e Six-Year Transportation' Improvement• Program ,
Y DoParo (n thotisanQs
Funding.
ProjccV Road Names! Description/ Curront Stafus Length PE RW CN Total Sources' 2dD7 2008 2009 2010 2011 2412 Tota!
7 h4ontgomery kvenue Inlay2 50 0 447 437 CDBG 497 497
. h9ont8omery Ny Argonne Road UnN+eroiP/ Road 1,0.5
Grind and ropeve wtth 2" of asphalt concro0e pavement
.
1
-
. VLbrk planned fo begin (n 2007 PmJea Toml 497 437
B 6rosct:ray Avanve Safory Study 5U 0 0 50 Cir, 50 50
8roadway Av 190 Sulfivan 5_37 '
TraEfic pkvn to scudy altvmatkes tn ceduoe acddents aioaig Broadrray .
Cortidor ' ' •
--•._.R......._---.
.
50
lhtork p4~u~sd tn l~fn f,n 2t?07 Fject TMaI 5U
' 9 Park Road - Bridging Ihe Velley9 BNSF Gmcfa Sep 902 2,001 13,6T2 16,525 CjN 32 91. 287 287 697 •
" Park Road lndiana FivCnue MontgomeryAve. 0.20 ather 37 104 330 330 801 •
01herSWOo •227 650 2,061 2,061 4,9N
17-....:.Wct Park Roa+t! Uo separoto fhe gr3cles at Park Road and Uto f3HSF STP 365 7,045 3,30II 3,30$ 8,026
railrouLl hacks.
. UcP 91 281 82S M , 2,002
. .
' •--------_........_-----._~......-----------~.....W-------..~
- Oesigning • _ Projcd Totaf 752 2,151 6.811 8,811 ' 16,525 , .
Pnoj`cts errcJ limcframes imenlificd In Ihc 11p are to Gc conaldered esOmatas anly tlmt may cttsncje Qim to s vsc4ery af_~+tissianoca.
sid ere not irnsnnea by t,'~o ciry io bo renea vy«i O~r axpcrty wmere ar ae+ctovers in uw,kiip devlnprnem doc3sl6ns.
. 4261D006 A3
Draft 2007- . 2012 HoarirgDis GH3!'100Ei AdoDtionDak,:
Ss*T~'O ~ ~ ~ ~v. Pss=a. Dato f2esoMJon No.:
P e six-YearTransportation,lmpro,vement Proqram
~ ~ Oolkvs in thoi8ards,
Funding
ProJecU Raad NamcsJ DsscriptionJ Curront Status Longth PP RW CN Total Sourcce 2007 2006 2009 2010 2011 2612 7otal
10 Parlc Roed - Fraject 2 267 1,000 2,391 3,658 Cw 113 140 478 .731
Park Rd SroaQway Av ind'rana Av 0.75 uaP 454 560 1,913 2,927
Proj. #X2 - Recore6rtxt and widen to fisre Wtne.
1
.
VNork pfanned to bE:gin in 2007 . Pra(act Totat • 567 700 2,391 3,659
, 11 Pat1c Rd #3 PE Orily , 594 0 0 594 Cily 25 25 , 50
• O:hcr 15 1 S 30
. . ~ STP(i/} 257 257 514
Reconsinrct snd w{dan m a standasd 34ane aftrmf with cmb , and '
sidewalks
Work pdanned t0 b£& (n 2007 Projetl Totid 297 297 594
~ iz Signal c«►voiier upgraaes . 32 o sse aoo cib 54- 54
~ c,aaa 346 340
Cuailro0er fmpruvemenM to varias in0etseCUoteS . .
.................._....-------•----°--------°------4U0
~
H~Ortc Plannea to tegln !n 2007 ar~a 7o~i aoo •
. projects nnd Crrtcframes trlentt6ed bn tho 7!P are to te cm-,(dwed "estirnstea a+y that may change Gwa.m a ti~aAe~y. P! drwmstanoes. . ~
und aro rtot intendee try tho Ciry to be rene9 ypon by Properry arwncrs w da-~pers in ttmktng dcvclopmcnt dedsbris.
A4 . . , ' . , .
,
Draft 2007- ' 2012 w~d~n&e: e,nanoos a~to~«~M~:
S#pQi Six-YearTransportation Improvement ProAram r"'v.`wwe.og'e Rmi"'fonNo_
. ~ vaH@y Ddlaca In Qiousnnds ' .
Fundinfl
ProJecU Rosd Names! DescripUonl Current Status - ~ Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
13 SuYrvan Rd PCC 36 0 414 ASO Clry 61 . 61
Sullivan Rd 102ston 190 E8 Ramps 0.10 S'r(F) 389 • 389
Raconstrud in PCC
.
11foric plan,-ied to b0gin In 2037 Projecl Total 450 450
• 14 Suliivan Roat! Wes! Brtdge 400 35 7,566 8,001 BR 435 3,783 3,026 7S7 8,001
Sullivan Rd Q Spokane Rivar 94511-5 0,00 RecansWct ead wfden %v~:.,t Drfdge "
_-••.--°-------_-•.....------......r._-----------........r_--------_....
• VVOik plantted to begin in 2Aff7 ProJed Total 435 3,783 3,028 757 8,001
15 Urtiaerslty Road Inlsy i 81 0 728 ` 809 Cih/ i1 98 , 109
, Universiiy Rd Dishm:in-7Aica Road 15fh Avanue 1.29 S'TP(P) 70 630 700
, Grind and pava with 2 inches of asphali Conrrete psvCmartL .
ry ~ .s...... - o.."".
VVak pJanned to begln Ui 2007 . PraJact Total 81 728 ~ . • 809
PcokCls end Grncfremes idcnJfled Lt lho 71P ere Oo be oomidcsd eatOn%a7c, anly itfat nm-I clkinge due to a varte4'q of ciraarisletioc;., ~ • • ' , •
end are not fntenQed by the City to De reiied upon py pcopatty anmrs ord?vetoptts In nnk(ny d'Mbpmerd dcci&lona
412CJ2005 A$ '
Draft 2007-• ~ 2012 "0~~~~= ~,~°°e
• Env. As&uss. Da4a Resniu6on No.:
~ Six-YearTransportation Improvement Program
pv ~ Dotisss in U~uasutida
eJ
Funding
' Projcct/ Road Names! DescriptioN,Current Statas ~ Length PE RW CN. Total Sourrxs 20D7 . 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
16 Univtrsity Raad Inlay 2 42 0 360 422 GH 6 51 67
Univarsiiy Rd 151h Avenue 41h A,.enua • 0_GH STPiP1 38 329 385
Grfnd and pava N7th 2 fnchss af asphalt wnaote pavernenL
. °
War4c planned to begtn in 2007 Pmp_~x Totaf 42 380 422
17 443h Ave Pathway _ U 0 209. 209 Cit/ 23 ~
144@iAv . VJoodruff Sands 1.03 S7P(E) 181 ~~1 ,
10-R ACP Pat}nvay .
- _......_W~-°------------- .
Designing "ectTow 208 209
18 81h Averwe Recoae3ntctlon 499 848 4,992 5.83? CfC/ 124 360 303 7871
Sth Averuo Havana Stree1 Park Road 200 STP(u) 558 1,615 1,359 3,532
- UaP 240 644 • SBd 1,518
Fteconstnrct Sth AHe. to a Ehree-lerre eedion vrith aub, gu?tsr, sifm+aGc.^, •
end b°ka lanes. . ~
.
~~ng ~t~ , Pm)ect Total 922 2,(i69 2,246 5,837
Pcv)ecb and limcframsa kleKi6et1 n tho Tlp ere tu Dc eonsltlered estinsa'j-- onP( that msy dtwge due to a vazlely ot ctraaiWaix';es, • . '
and arc not trimMed 4y tho Clty tu De refted Gpon 6pl propeAy ormers ar tlevalapers h ena7cirV develapment deetsfoic;
4t.-F--) A8
. . ,
~ _ .
~
Draft 2007- 2012 Heafug Mcm cdi3rzoos aaopCion oew
Grv.Assess. DAte Rcsdutlon No.' ,
Six-Year Transportation lmprovement Proqram
DoI13r, In tAarssncls
J Funding
ProJceU Road NamesJ Doscripdon/ Currcnt Status'- L.ength PE RW CN Total Sources 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
i B Argonne - Knax Intet~',etfion 40 10 366 436 CIPj 6 52 58
Argonne Rd @ Knox 0.00 CIAAo 44 334 378
Upgtac4e InW_r:tection ,
~
...roj..------~....---- -
'Nak planned to begin in 2009 . Pect 7ctal 50 388 436
Tll , Berker Road -llppfway' tp BroadAmy Avartiue 171 500 1,542 2,213 c[tY 84 204 . 164 442
13orker Roid Appfevray BroadKay AvCatua 026 UA' 337 817 617 1,771
fteconstruct to a Tvo-tane BIVs[i31 with oEflbn tsrm Gtne irom App{away to
Brnadvxfy Ava. .
-----_••.......------...e-----•-----......._----------°-^..21....Y
' VJOdc plantiect to begtn tfl 2~ Prc)edToml 421 1,021 771 2,3
♦
21'Amonnalddontgomery, NBR Tum Lana 17 25 163' 205 Cuy S 22 27
NBonne Itd Q Montgomery 0.00 C►utq 37 941 :178
Add Pfm right tum lane
_
• VJOrk ptanrted to begin fn 2005' ProJect Ta~~l 42 163 206
Projocts mul t[mafrsmes idcnti2ed tri Uro TIP ere ta be oom7derod estlma(es ortf Um1 may diange dtia tu e vshcty at cGEumsiances, ~
tind are rot iWsrsded Dy thc CL'y to DC reried upon bY Pmperb amers or devaJopers in maft dc~mlapment ctcastom. ,
4fZCi2006 A7
Draft .2007- 2012 N~n~D2'n' a"w°°a Ae°°ff"'°am:
~0 '
. p c Six-YearTransportation Improyemerit ProQram 61'!. A33ESS_ 13fl19 RcaoluQon No,.:
~ vauey . Go4ass tn Ihoe;sands '
Fund[nQ
ProjecU Road Names! Descrfptlonl Current Status Length PE RW CN Total Sources• 2007 2008 -2069 2610 2011 2012- Total
22 Pinos Corridor ITS ' 14 0 S 59 . 133 Ciy 18 18
- Pht-- Rd 96tfi Ava. . Trtnt Ava O.OD . CMAO 115 115
TralOc Sdgnal Control System for Cortidor • "
'
4Vork pdanned to begin in 2008 Prqtu Tobl 133 133 ,
23 32ndAvenue 131 501 1,180 1,812 GTi 38 48 159 245
32rd A+renue SR 27 Best Road 0.48 SPN) 243, 303 1,021 1,567
RecoarsUuCt and vroden En three I:nos xSth afis end s[deaallu. • .
...............e.......•••-_
_W.....
VJak planned Eo beg(n tn 2009 Pm ectTatsi ZS1 351 1,1180 1,812
24 BaAcet Road - 8th to Appleway 239 500 2,139 2,878 Clry • 68 BO 428 576
Barkes Rd 8th AppleHmy Me. 0.75 Odwr 68 80 428 576
UCP 203 240 1,283 1.726
ReeansWct to e threedane urban erterial from 8th W Spragua. , • '
VWoik plsnned to berfin in 2009 • • Pro}ect Total 339 ...400 2,139 2,878
Projecta end fimetaancs identtfled In M TIF am in be cmsfderat cs:tnaGes oMf thal nsay cRangc dua Qo a tiarlety ot ctreurcislaneiim;
.and afc not htended by lJne City to bo nellad upon by proper?y owners ordErvcJopera h rn*ktng develnpmcnt dcci&iocis_
4la _''1 Ag
~ .
D raft 2007' 2012 Hcatfng Dste: 811~2006 AdPpt3on Da?a
S~~~ 5tv. Assesa. OsIB R~olufion No.: .
1~ Six-Year Transportation- Improvement Proqram .
~ VaDei'~j • Dat._rs in ihausercls . J Funding
ProjecU Road Names/ DescripUon/ Curccnt Status L.engtfi PE ' RW CN Tocal Sourccs 2007 2006 2009 2010 2011 2012 Tofal
25 FlOta RoeQ 252 300 2,269 2,920 Ct'.•! 80 257 227 564
,Flom Rd SplaptreAv Itiisson kv 1.00 , uCP 322 1,027 907 2,256
FLeconsEnic4 to a thcee-lano ortsrial. -
. .
1MpttC ptanned lo Dagin tn 2009 PMJea TaWI 402 1,234 1,134 2,520
26 Park Road - F'roJec! 3 CN ' 0 501 5,344 5,845 Ciri 34 238 227 497
Peifc Road Spraguo Avenva Broadway Avenue 0.50 Oth~r _ 20 139 134 293
S1P{U) 197 1,362 1,313 2,872
ReconsVuct and vhd:n W e atendard Shfae-lano ar'mriai streat with aabs ucp 150 1.035 993 2.983
sntl ;,iclewelks. '
_ 5Cakit~gftmctitg . ' FrosectTalal • 40r1 2,772 2.872 5.845
27 Spraque - Conklin Signal 25 15 260 300 Clr/ 180 180
Spragua Rd @ Coniclin ~ 0_00 oe~a 120 124
Signal InsFailation ~
, .
. '
.....r......
VJork planned to bCgin iri 2009 ~ Pro{cctTotal 300• ~
t . -
prn}ed. arod ilmeh~rnes idcnti9ed hi Itr~ TIP ere m bo ea~atdered celmaies n~j lhat may U~angnn dUe t'la'v3faety of dreumslancc.v. ' ' . ~ • .
, and ara nol ir4Cndcd by the CRy W bo riNted upon G'Y Pgopert11 anners ordcvelopers tn maldng dcvetapmcK dedstorts. '
4/26I2006 A8 .
Draft 2007- 2012 "earineD'tec 611312006 A°°°''°"°a:e'
at►• c ~ . Env. Assess. O~ats ite8olNfon Nn :
Spo`l~ne Six-YearTransportation Improvement Proqram •~Valey I„~~~,~,~~ .
Funding
ProjecU Road Namesl Descriptionl Current Status • Lenglh PE RW CN Total Sources 2007 2006 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
23 Euciid Avei FDora Rd 336 501 3,024 3,861 CE:y AS 60 408 521
Eudid Av Flora Road Barker Road 0.97 S7PM 291 433 2,616 3,340
Flora Rd Eud)d Road Eucad Road 0.14
Fteeoe-Anx# bo provida a three Iano, shouidefed arOqlal • . . .__W............
1h~tk plantlCd to begin, iri 2010 "ect Tobl 336 501 3,024 3,861
29 1Aission AHB ReconsVuctbn • 286 300 2,576 3,182 Clc/ , 87 ZHB 258 633
Mission Av F6orH tTatlcer . 0.99 U!P 349 1.150 1.030 2,529
Nenv 34ane secUon Fioca to 8artcer -
WarX plannad tn begin in 2010 Pro ectToim 438 1,438 1,288 3,182
30 Siillivan Road Reconstructlon 560 1,000 2,519 4,079 Ciry 56 216 544 816
" Suffrvan Road EudYd Avemie Weliesloy AvenuD 1-00 UCP 224 884 2,175 3,263
RecorLstrud to a sevc»-lane urban arterLgL •
' .
Mrk pdanru;d tD begin In 2010 PmJactTotel 2Sa 1,080 2,719 4,079
' Projccw and Itrnoltsmes itlrnJfied In tho 1tP ara Ie he wn0d¢reA est[metQS ottj l"rn.ry charuo dw ta a vaAaty of cSrcurtqt13rtc., , . '
. arW ere rrot InOCnQed by iho Cfry ro De rgied upon by propertj ownera oc dcmlopws fn meklrg deveSoprrr_n18..:..i,...c., , • - .
- • A!0
~i t l. ` •
~
[~carv DI'aft 2007- '2012 - H~drig aare: cn'.=os AdoptbnDae:
Six-Year Transportatiorf Imp'rov. • •ement Proqram . Fsv. AAM.^s. Qatc Resolulion Na: , .
IJ VJ1Ci.~L~
p t7
Do[I= tn thousands , • '
ci1. J
Funding.
ProjccU Road NamcS! DescriptIon! Current Status Leriflth PE 141N CN Total Sources 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Tota!
31 Vallay Cortidor- Projsd 3 PE 667 0 0 687 Ctry - 00 90
Evargreen ApplwwAy aoo . STPM 577 5-17
Valay CaupleS Etesgreen ' AppOerhay 225 • '
. F_xtend Applevay Btvd. m9th a rnu(ti-lene fadllty InUuding aubs uaod .
Sidewalks. Re ;urfsce Spragse AuCntte and reSUtpO. .
...................W......•.
Wbdc pfannmd !o begin in 2009 • PcoJcctTalal . 687 667
32 Barker Raad - Spolcem Rirw tn Trent . 377 160 0 527 CitY 36 35 71
Barker Road Spakang RNer Trent Averaw 1.51 3TFN) 228 228 458
. ReoonsWd to a three-lane aubed ertariq) . . .
~ • •
. Wou.t piannsd to begin in 2011 Pmkd Te'd 264 263 527
33 8amf'+sh Road 393' S00 ~ 0 893 GI9 ~ ~ ~ 179
' Liowdish Road 32nd Avenue am avenuo 1.62 S-rpM »j 168 359
. unP 169 186 355
Recvnstnici and wfden roadway to three Ianea.
.
VNOifc plenned to be9tn tn 2011 f'rv70a Tata1 425 468 893 ~
Prujeci,a and Umeltames ttle++tified tn the 1lP stt: to 6c consldere4 eswie.:a o* that may dsange duc Oo b wartary W_ciraircishmti;s, • •
and are nut fntendcd by ihe Cily Oa be: rci7cd upan Dy prpyctty ovmera aUevela4ers in maldng developmenl dectiom: ' ' . .
412 812 0 0 6 A f 7 ~ .
~ y
,a
D raft 2007- - 2012 "ca'i'9 °am rd'3r2DO6 ''G11°`'m°" oa`a
orr Env. /45csa. Dato ResnluUnti NO,:
~ SpokanTe siX-Year Transportation: improvement Proqram ~
~s~„ey - Qoh~rs ln lhnusaa~sSa Fun - .
(il_l
ding
Project! Road Namasl DoscriptivN Currsnt Status ' Length PE 'RW CN Total Sources 2007 2608 2009• 2010 2011 2012 Total
~ 34 Broadway Ave - Ftara to Barker ~ 262 250 0 572 Gri 52 50 102
Bros@+r,ry Av Rcm 8arkw _ -8.04 UA' . 210 200 410
ReCOnsWCttO 34ane3, FEorfl to BaPker
. . f
. 1M1~rk pfatrned to bogin in 2011 Proixi ToWI 262 2~0 512
35 Brosdway Avo.Moora to Flora 190 300 0 490 CitY so 48' 98
DroaGrreyAv 180 ft E of Moora FWra 0,73 UAP 200 192 392 ,
~ ReconsWct & widen Broadway +.n 34sns seellon, 180 ft E. of Mooro tA FEora
•-Y.--------------
1Alorlc p!s?RnCd lo begin (n 2011 . FrqectYUSat 250 240 490
36 Evergraw Raad 267 400 0 667 Cih 53 80 133
EvMrecn Rd 32txi Avenue 1 Fith Avenue 1.00 UA' 214 320 534,
Reoonstruct and ti%iden to throo L3nes
' _
WoAc pianned to begfn in 2011 • ' . • Projeet Totil 267 400 607
Projcras sM Gfieirarncs idanWed In Qtc TIP are !n be aortsidared esUrnates ony ihat may 'chwge due lo n v0ri^ty of ctrcumstantes,
anA me not inmnded by thc C'ity :o be relitd upon 6y propCsty cwneca ar dr.metopmrz. in ma9dng developmen[ 6rJ1.1ona.
,yA f2 ; ;I .
a ~ .
Draft '2007- 2012 "°a+ro°ate= er,3rMoe adf°p"°"°O=
Sp"TTO~ , tnv_ A-,m ex. Dato Re.ofu0on No.:
. Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
VaHe '
y ooffa;i h ~=nJz;
. Funding,
ProjocU Road NamesJ DascriptloN Current Status Lerigth PE RW CN Total 3ources ~20U7 2008 20U9 ` 2010 2A11. 2012 Tota{
38 Saltese,lSullivan S(gnal 39 18 251 30E CrdY 77 77
Saftsse Av @ Su111vAn Rd 0.0~ OthG 229 220
fWroverriCnts to InterSacEion '
-
- 306
VJoak planned lo begin in 2012 306•
39 VaRey Cortudor - Pro}ect 3 CN 0 1,50D 4,337 5,837 Ci.y 350 437 787
Ve" Couplot Evetgrecn Road ApplewaY R~d 225 oUxx Srate ' 250 250
sTP(U) 400 1,400 1,800
Fx?end npptmvay 81vd, w& a mutli-tane fa:Sliry indudirxg curbs and ~p 3,900 3,000
sidaeraucs. Rcsurface Sptagua Avenuo and mstripo. -
.
Work pianned to bog'vn In 2009 Prokd Total . 754 5,087 5,837
40 Cematian Truck l.arie 200 0 0 200 CRY 27 ~ 27
Camahan i7d &h Ciry LimIL, 0_50 ~ STAN3 173 173
Add Sf3 Wdc Lane to road
. „ . .
• ' „ • •
VJrnic planned fo begin (n 2012 ProJect Total 200 200
Prqieck+ and ttmefrmrim fdcnltrie9 ci tha TIP care tn bo cana[dered clfrnataa oNy lRxt maY ahan8e dus to u'vattery of draimetances,
iind aro nat tnlcnded by the Gly to bo reltecf upon by proXrty ahmers or QereloyoB fn mak(ng de»toprnent dcctsforia.
4l28l2006 A f 3
DI'aft 2007- 2012 '~a" oat": a"arzo°a '+a°r°1°" aam:
ars iO~ Ernr., :c-.5 b,co RcsaaNaa► n~.:
S~JQe Siz-YearTransportation lmpr.ovement Proqram i ~
* VaHey ood.as tn lhous,-.nds I
Funding
Projecf/ Road Namest Oescriptionl Current Status LengtN PE RW CN Total gource, 20,07 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
41 SR 27 Pedestrian CrossGng ' 128 50 0 178 CRY 36 36
SR-27 0 24th Avo 0.00 Oihff 142 142
PedesUian Crosstng @ 24th sw
Work plannsd tn begin in 2012 • Piqsct Tortn► 178 778
42 SR271P'uiesH6(h Itrier'.•ccEion 194 150 0 344 CUY 69 89 Piito3 Rd Q 96th & SR27 0_00 r other Slsta 59 89
- uqt> 206 208
Impruvements to Intepectlon (Dvai tane Round3b0ul7) .
___......._...de.. _..-3f'. 3------3Mi
Wotk pL~[tnod to begtrt lR 2012 . P~ajtdTola! .
43 Slreet Areservatian Projccts . . 649 0 8.950 ' 7,599 Cf.y 1,000 1,359 1,300 1,540 1,200 1,290 7,599
Various Roaft 0_00
Annual Strect preservation projects
......__...s~ ;...a--•-_....~.._...».....s.......~..
.
Desfgning&willconsUVCt Pru[cdTatal 1,000 1,359 1,300. 1.fi40 1.200, 1,200 7,539
f .
Pto)eels and Itmcfracmea IdentQed En Qwe TIP am in be mrt~rJered esUmaji-, antv that rnay chi.ango dua to a vadety ot cteum:han=, _ , .
and aro not IntentleC by {hc Cdty to be ieQed upon by pruysrty awTefs or de+r7oper. fn rrsaktng dcvcloqmcni dedarona: , •
A14
•
Draft 2007-, 2012 Heetng D3t~ ~3rzoos ~vsi«~ odoc: ,
Erw. Assess. aa!e ResaQ,tinn No.:
SP6-1&nE Six-Year Transportation'Improvement Program ,
~~alley ~~~~~~e . . .
Funding
"ProJecU Rosd kamesJ Descriptionl Current Status lenpth PE RW CN Total Sources 2007 2008 2009 20'IO * 2011 2012 Total
43 Bsrker Road FtecomWction, 32nd tn &fh 40 0 0 40 CY 40 40
Barker Ftd 32rxi 81D O.OD
Spa.+mne County Pr*ct RecombuG BarY.er tp 3lane Sed(on, Ciry
Pafner match '
.
S(,Oking fundin~ Projecl Toml 40 40
. Total: 9,163 14,670 59,044106,817 13,743 21,505 23,448 118,651 13,868 15,869
ProJacts and tirncS'amea klentificd ln Ehe TiP aris io be oansid^acd esthneles onty ihai may dmrnge du"s !n e vmfety of d aimstancft,
end aro mt LY.endcd by 1he Ciry to Do ielleU upwn bY PmAeftY or QeveEoperc tn rtealdng QevelOpmCnt dBCfBfOns.
4fzW2U06 A15 ' £
Draft 2007- 2012 HW„g oOx: en3rmos Adoption Date:
~
~n' ~ :°.ee~. Uste Rcsol~Sa~ No.:
} S~IO,n~.~ Six YearTransportation tmprovement Program F~v. k
_ ,
~ cy DORM in «a
Funding
Project! Road NamesJ DescriptioN Cument Status Length PE . RW CN Total Souraes 2007 2008, ,2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
' Slz-Year Transoortation Imorovement ProqlgMjotals ,
' Ya3r FeCvrnl Sda?e 09tcr , Clty
2007 E,816 994 2,OSi6 2,037
20p8 15,520 3,344 622 2,120 ~
2W9 11,057 7.649 532 3,104
2010 7.857 8,962 549 3.983
'
2011 3,586 6,0OS 791 3,510
2012 4,605 7,fi28 142 3,286
. ProJecLs and Efine6rames Etlenifiad cn tha TIf+ are to bo oamsidered estimabe oM/ ttut msy chmige Que to a ti:isiMy at dwmstancrs,
antl ere not in;unded by Ne Ciry 1n bo ruricd upon Dy propixty ownera ar developcr in ma'tMg devatopmx!rit deci.ions.' , • . ' -
~
qfT . • A46 l ` . . .
. 't
I \
L
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
~ . Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 2, 2006 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Report on Consultant for Street Master Plan
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adopted the drafting of a well-defined Street Master
Plan, with funding options, as a principal 2006 budget goal. Reviewed a draft scope of work at
the December 20, 2005 Council Study Session and authorized staff to issue an RFP for the
selection of a consultant. .
BACKGROUND: Council has expressed their desire to develop a well-defined Street Master
Plan, -with funding options, that identifies the current condition of the city streets and
recommends appropriate improvements and maintenance that preserve the value and structural
integrity of the local transportation system.
Staff developed a scope of work and issued an RFP for the selection of a consultant. Two
consultants submitted responses; HDR and J-U-B Engineers. The RFP responses were
reviewed by staff and interviews were held. J-U-B Engineers was selected as the most highly
qualified consultant for this project. -
O The scope for this work is divided into three phases. Phase one is the development of
pavement management system that will evaluate the current conditions' of the city streets and
determine what steps are needed to maintain them at their current level. Phase two is to assist
in the development of a Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan incorporating the results of
phase one and the other transportation needs of the city. Phase three combines the first two
phases into a singe Street Master Plan report.
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: .
The preliminary fee proposal is as follows: • Phase 1-$232,270 for the pavement management phase
• Phase 2-$186,400 for the transportation improvement planning phase • Phase 3 - $ 16,800 for the final Street Master Plan Report
Total - $435,470
Available Funds in the Steeet Fund:
• Pavement Management Plan . $275,000
• Snow removal costs were very low in Jan/Feb $160.470
Total $435,470-
~ STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten, Public Works Director; Steve Worley, Senior Engineer
ATTACHMENTS Draft Scope of V1Jork
Spokane Valtey Street Master Plan
Scope of Work
SECTION 1- BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
The City of Spokane Valley is a newly incorporated City of over 80,000 people. As such, the City
has a need to produce ptanning documents and Capital Improvement Programs with respect to
transportation infrastructure to serve the anticipated growth. The City has requested consultant
assistance to prepare the first Street Master Plan and a Pavement Management Plan for the City.
The intent of the e.fforts described in the Scope of Work below is to provide the City support,
guidance and docurrientation to prepare Plans and Prograrns and prioritize transportation needs,
prepare projects for potential funding source grant applications and to understand ongoing
pavement maintenance needs as well as future on-going needs with respect to roadway networlc
evaluation, project development and pavement management system maintenance. .
SECTION 2- ITEAAS PROVIDED BY CLIENT TO J-U-B
The following information, data, services and/or responsibilities will be provided by the Client,
without cost to J-U-6.
• Existing planning documents, records, data and reports, such as comprehensive land
use and transportation plans; zoning maps; roadway information systems; pavement
condition information; and appropriate maps; 6 Year transportation improvement . •
Programs; non-motorized facilities; available traffic studies; accident records, etc.
• Gather, obtain and provide traffic volume data on roadways and at important intersections, to include Average Daily Traffic and peak hour.
• Pubtishing as necessary public meeting notices and press releases.
SECTION 3- SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY J-U-B .
J-U-B shall furnish the services specifically limited to the following: -
Phase I- Pavement Manaeement Plan .
It is anticipated that several of the tasks in this phase will be undertaken simultaneously or in
consideration of other tasks. For example, the network definition and database development
tasks will clearly be driven by the selection of the software which in turn will be influenced by
the needs assessment. The full development of a pavement management system assumes that
City Council accepts the premise that benefits will warrant such a system. Task 1- Needs Assessment: Conduct a needs assessment to determine the viability of
developing a pavement management system (PMS) for the City. Interviews/meetings will be
conducted with key individuals from the City staff, including the Public Works Director, '
engineering staff, maintenance personnel, and other staff that will be involved in the future -
use of potentiat pavement management data and/or outputs. The purpose of the interviews is
to determine the types of available pavement management information, current program
budgets, current staffing levels of Public Works personnel, and any other information
necessary for the consultant to perform the assessment. Interviews will focus on answering O
I questions such as: What is anticipated as an end product? What are expectations on how the
-1- •
O pavement management system will impact employee efficiency? What are the anticipated
budgets for maintaining the pavement managernent system? What is the make-up of current
staffing - availability, technical strengths, etc.? The consultant will evaluate the benefits to the City from the creation of a pavement management system. A report shall be prepared to
present finding5. This report shall clearly detail the reasons and benefits of implementing the
system. The report shall also identify the impacts to City infrastructure and budgets if the
pavement management systern is not implemented.
Task 2- inventory Data Collection: This task involves collecting inventory information that
will be used to establish the pavement management database. It includes the collection of
existing inforrnation on the roads and streets that will be included in the implementation .
area. The types of data that will be collected are expected to include the following items, at
a minimum: ' • Location information (referencing with `frorn' and `to' characteristics)
• Dimensions (lehgth, width, area)
• Surface type
• Last construction date
• GIS identifiers Some existing information is available through the current City and County records (including
the Centertine PMS software information generated by Spokane County). The accuracy and
O thoroughness of the information may need to be verified. Aerial photography will be used to
evaluate accuracy and compteteness of existing centertine data. The consultant will evaluate
and make the most of all existing paper or digital databases that appty to roads, whether they
come from the County, City, or some other agency. Locational verification and conditionat
inventory of roads will be conducted in the field to supplement existing data and complete
the roadway network. Task 3- Network Definition: The pavement network shall be divided into facilities and
sections. Current philosophy suggests looking at using a block-by-block approach for dividing
pavement facilities into sections with intersections included in the block section. Multilane
streets may be divided by direction in addition to block-by-block segments. Management
sections can be aggregated into more applicable project lengths manually when developinv
final pavement maintenance and rehabilitation project tengChs.
Special consideration will be given to multi-lane facilities, divided roadways, and current
identification methods. These identification conventions shall be recorded_in the final
document to ensure that as the City of Spokane Valley expands, the pavement network ,
inventory is user friendly, can be easily updated and maintained.
Task 4- Condition Assessment: Consultant shall propose and implement a survey procedure
to assess the condition of City streets in accordance with the current Pavement Surface
Condrtion Fre(d Rating Manua( used by the Northwest Pavement Management Association. .
This will be done for the results to be comparable to data previously obtained by Spokane
County. Only pavement condition will be assessed in the survey; not the condition of curb and
gutter or sidewalks. However, it will be noted what edge-of-pavement treatment each
segment possesses (shoulder, curb and gutter, etc.). It will be important that the City's staff
'
. -2-
participate in the review of our data collection and condition assessment portions of the plan. ,
Sections on undivided roads will be full-width sections. In other words, assume that each .
section (block or intersection) will be defined as a section that spans the length and width of
the block (both directions of travel) on undivided roads. Sections on multilane streets may be
divided by direction in addition to block-by-block segments. Pavement condition surveys will
be conducted for each section taking into account the condition of the road in each direction
of travel.
For the purposes af this Scope of Work it is assumed that there are approximately 450
centerline miles of roadway, with arterial and collector roadways comprising 113 of roadway
network (2-man crew 2 hours per mile); and local roadways comprise 2/3 of mileage (one
person one hour per mile). -
Task 5- Database Development: Upon completion of the previous tasks, a pavement
management database shall be developed using the inventory and condition information
collected. If available, construction history will also be incorporated into the database
devetopment. We will work closely with staff to identify what is to be stored in a database,
how it needs to be viewed and retrieved, who will be retrieving it, and what types of reports
will be necessary.
Task 6- Software Evaluation and Development: Consultant will evaluate available public
domain and proprietary software for. use in development of the pavement management .
system. The consuttant will recommend a software package that wilt meet the needs of the ,
City as determined in Task 1- Needs Assessment. Among other things,'our evaluation will '
consider: flexibility, usability, data entry, output, multi-users, historical data, longevity, costs
to City of Spokane Valley. The consultant shall procure the software for the City after
discussions with key staff. This task shall also include customization of the selected pavement
management software to include the development of pavement deterioration models to
predict the performance of the pavement network in the future, the identification of
treatment rules to determine when certain maintenance and rehabilitation treatments are
viable, and the establishment of treatment costs so that budgets can be developed.
Task 7- Six-Year Pavement Management Plan with Reports and Maps: The information
contained in the pavement management database and the models developed in the previous
task shall be used to prioritize the maintenance and rehabilitation needs of the City under
realistic constraints such as budget limits. The final product of this task shall include a multi-
year pavement maintenance and rehabilitation plan that is developed based on the
parameters established in the pavement management system. Results of the analysis will be .
presented to City staff in the form of a report, which also provides the related details of the
implementation and color-coded GIS maps that show the proposed locations of work '
throughout the City.
Factors talcen into consideration when producing the schedule include the existing roadway
budget and historical maintenance data. The consultant will produce several pavement .
rnanagement strategies (using different possibte pavement treatment types) to show that
there is more than one approach to managing the City's pavement network.
~
~
-3-
The goal is to either maintain the current pavement conditions (provided the pavement is in
good condition) or to attain a desirable network average pavement condition within 5 to 10
years. The report produced as a result of this task will include future maintenance strategy
maps (on a yearly basis) as well as tables listing the specific roadway segments and their
respective treatments.and costs on a yearly basis.
Task 8- System Maintenance Evaluation: The consultant shall develop a plan for maintaining
the Pavement Management system. The p(an shall identify the personnel and cost5 associated
with maintaining the system by: 1) consultant contract and, as an alternative, by 2) in-house
City personnel. The plan shall identify the necessary F1'Es, equipment, and supplies to keep
the program viabte. A brief report shall be prepared ahd submitted detailing the findings of
this task.
Task 9- City Council Presentation: Early on in the effort, following the needs assessment,
the consultant will present the results of the needs assessment to the City Council on the '
whole project, both phases. Council can express their perception of the pavement network.
J-U-B will discuss what a successful pavement management system consists of and will be
ready to answer questions the City Council would have regarding the topic of pavement
management. Also this would give J-U-B good insight to possible concerns the Council sees in
the future relating to pavement condition.
To complete this phase, J-U-B will present to the City council the findings of Tasks 7 and 8. A
~ summary of the conducted inventory as well as a brief overview of the chosen software will accompany the presentation of the findings. The council will be informed of the existing
conditions of the City's pavement network and the steps needed to implement a successful
pavement management system. It is anticipated that the City Council will be presented
multiple pavement managernent strategies to consider. We will encourage questions from tlie
Council in order to help them understand future staffing and budgets necessary for ongoing
pavement maintenance and system maintenance.
Task 10 - Training and System Installation: Following the completion of Tasks 1 through 9,
the specific pavement management software program shall be installed on the necessary
computers at the City. Four (4) days of training will be provided to City staff who will be
working with the pavement management software. The training will inctude an introduction
to the general concepts of pavement management along with specific instruction relating to
the use of the selected pavement management software. The training will include lecture,
discussion, and hands-on use of the software. The consultant shall also provide the 'City with a
users manual and all necessary documentation for staff to consult during the use of the PMS.
Phase 2 - Transportation Planning
Task 1- Review and Evaluation: The consultant shatl review and evaluate the city's current
methods for deve4oping the annual Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). This
shall include a review of the available data used to develop the TIP and the manner is which
the data is managed. The purpose of this evaluation is to identify ways to improve the
methods used and improve the collection, storage, and evaluation of data necessary to
support the development of the annual TIP project priority list. Interviews/rneetings will be .
conducted with key individuals from city staff, including the Public Works Director,
-4-
engineering staff, maintenance personnel, and other staff that witl be involved in the future 'development of the annual TIP. The interviews will help determine the types of available ~
information, how this data is currently stored, retrieved and used, current staffing fevels of
Public Works personnel, and any other information necessary for the consultant to perform the
assessment. This effort will help to understand project expectations, goals and objectives of
the City.
Through the course of the meetings/interviews, we expect that all current pertinent data will
be obtained. This data will likely include, at a minimum, existing street maps, traffic data
(induding historical), roadway right-of-way maps, traffic control devices, street classification
maps, previous studies, existing and future land use data, aerial photography and city
Jinancial data for public works expenditures, staffing level5 and responsibilities.
A report shall be prepared to present the consultant's findings. This report shall dearly
indicate if the current available data is adequate for development of the TIP and to support
grant applications. The report shall also identify improvements needed, if any, in the
methods or data used to support the development of the annual TIP. The report shall also '
identify on-going staffing levels, resources, and budget to maintain the development of the
TIP each year.
. Task 2- Database Development: After reviewing the city's data upon which the prioritized
TIP project list is developed, the consultant shall review databases or other methods of data
storage used by other Washington jurisdictions, including Spokane County, and develop a -
recommendation on how the city's data could be better managed. The consultant shall then
develop a database, a series of databases, or other methods that will allow city staff to better manage the information necessary for the evaluation and prioritization of transportation
projects. This will include the management of transportation network volume/capacity ratios,
intersection levels of service, number and types of collisions/injuries/fatalities, recent local
bid r.esults for unit price estimating, and other types of information identified in Task 1. The
recommended data management tool could be a third-party software, a modification of
another jurisdiction's methods, or the development of an entirely new method. Once a
method is selected, the consultant sha(l develop that method using the city's available data
and train city staff on its use.
. Task 3-Six-Year TIP Project List: The consultant shall assist city staff in the development of
the 2008-2013 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) using data identified in
. Task 1. This shall include, but not be limited to, review of 1) volume/capacity ratios based on .
Spokane regional traffic models, 2) number, location, and type of collisions/injuries/fatalities,
and 3) existing and forecast intersection (evels of service. Coordination with other types of .
information will be required including: 1) existing pavement conditions, 2) increased areas of
development and re-development within the city and in areas adjacent to the city, 3)
adjacent jurisdiction street projects that cross city boundaries, 4) proposed street
maintenance activities, and 5) full width paving projects associated with Spokane County's
Septic Tank Elimination Program. For the purposes of this Scope of Work, it is assumed that
data will be provided by the City for 126 intersections and approximately 3600 accident
records, and that an average of 2 hours per intersection will be required for analysis.
-5-
O The consuttant shall develop and use a type of ranking systern that will utilize the available
data to identify and support a prioritized TIP project list. The project list shall be divided into
logical categories. Example categories include, but are not timited to, Arterials, Safety,
Traffic Control, Sidewalks/Trai(s, and ITS. It is anticipated that some assistance at a policy
level may be necessary to provide guidance in prioritizing projects between project types.
Task 4- Six Year TIP Cost Estimates: Once a prelirninary project list is developed, the -
consultant shall prepare planning-tevel cost estimates for each project. The planning-level
cost estimates shall include 1) a description of the proposed improvements, including number
of proposed (anes, intersection improvements, pedestrian/bicycle improvements, ADA requirements, drainage facilities, etc., 2) maps that define the proposed project limits, 3)
estimated quantities of proposed bid items including unit prices based on recent Spokane area
bid tabs, 4) right-of-way acquisition costs, and any other appropriate items. Conceptual
alternatives for some projects may be required in order to determine potential right-of-way
costs. For the purposes of this Scope of Woric it is assumed that project descriptions, maps
and cost estimates will be prepared for 40 projects with an average of 1 day per project.
Task 5- Six Year TIP Funding Proposals: The consultant shall review the project setection
criteria of the local, state, and federal grant programs available and shall identify agrant
funding program (or combination of grant programs) for each project on the TIP project list.
Grant programs shall indude, but not be limited to, the following:
~ • WA State Transportativn Improvement Board (TIB)
■ Corridor Completion Initiative (CCI)
• Urban Arterial Program (UAP, previously AIP)
• Urban Corridor Program (UCP, previously TPP)
■ Sidewalk Program (SP, previously PSMP)
• Freight Mobility/Strategic Investment Board (FMSIB) • Federal Aid Program
• Bridge (BR) ■ Surface Transportation Frogram (STP)
■ Congestion Management/Air Quality Funds (CMAQ) •
■ Transportation Enhancement Program
■ Emergency Retief
• Intersection and Corridor Safety
• WSDOT
• Safe Routes to Schoot Program.
• Pedestrian and Bicyde Safety Program .
■ Regional Mobility Grant Program '
• Spokane Transit Authority (STA)
• ' Bus related street improvements
• Community Development Block Grants (CDBG)
■ Low-Moderate Income area improvements
• Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (WUTC)
~ • Grade Crossing Protective Fund
-6-
The consultant shatt also identify potential funding partners such as adjacent jurisdictions
and/or private devetopers, economic developments, multi-modal compohents, etc. to
compete well in grant competitions. It may also be beneficial to reprioritize projects based
on this exercise. For the purposes of this Scope of Work it is assumed that funding proposals
will be prepared for 40.projects with an average of 2-3 hours per project plus discussions with
you and evaluations of agency program updates. Preliminary projett scoping is also a product
of this task.
Task 6- Six Year TIP Report - The consultant shall develop a Six Year TIP Report that consists
of the list of prioritized projects divided into categories and phases (PE, RW, and CN), by year
(based on available local match funds), by funding source, etc. City staff has presented
previous TIP reports to Council using both a spreadshegt and database methods. The
cvnsultant shatt review these two methods and recommend or develop an alternate method
for easily creating, editing, and tracking projects and project status in the TIP. The TIP report
shatt consist of a list of prioritized projects The TIP report shatt include all necessary
information for inclusion into the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) software.
Task'7 - Grant Applications: It is anticipated that J-U-B will assist the City with the
preparation of grant applications during the summer of 2006 to understand current techniques
used by the City and develop an understanding of current projetts. It is anticipated that the
Spolcane Regional Transportation Council will issue a Call for Projects for the'07-'09 biennium .
as a re5ult of the recently passed federal transportation bill. It is also anticipated that the
Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) grant applications for the 2008 construction season
will be due at the end of August 2006. The consultant shatt assist city staff prepare these, and
other, grant applications. Grant applications vary but the general type of information and
research required includes, but is not limited to: existing structural pavement condition,
existing and proposed levels of service (LOS), existing and proposed traffic volumes, system
continuity, project funding, alternative mode accessibility, transportation concurrency,
economic growth and development, urban accident analysis/annual benefit, public
support/participation, environmental enhancements/historical preservation, freight mobility,
GMA information/support, etc. Usually it is not overty productive to submit an excessive number of projects applications for
the same grant source, but rather to prepare applications for those projects that will compete
the best - focus efforts on preparing good applications rather than many apptications. For the
purposes of this Scope of Work it is assumed that up to 15 grant applications will be prepared -
7 TI6, 3 Enhancement and 5 other Federal, State or local grants with an average of 1 man-day
per application.
Task 8- Resources Report: A stand alone document will be prepared that identifies
resources of the City of Spokane Valley that are used to prepare the annual Transportation
Improvement Program. This report will identify data sources and methodologies for data
collection and storage as wetl as the data evaluation and project prioritization processes
developed as part of the development of the 2008 - 2013 TIP. This information will be
conveyed in order for staff and elected offtctals to understand the level of effort that will be
required to maintain the TIP on an annual basis. Recommendations for future regular traffic ~
data collection updates will be made along with database maintenance, data evaluation and
-7-
project development for new projects identified in the future, along with project
~ prioritization and report updates. A summary of the level of effort anticipated to accomplish
these tasks from an equipment, staffing and budget perspective will be provided.
Task 9- Public Involvement: The consultant shall prepare for and attend one public open
house to present project identified and receive feedback to assist in the prioritization process
and ensure that all potential projects have been identified.
Phase 3- Street Master Plan Report
The Consultant shall prepare a final Street Master Plan report that summarizes the. efforts and .
condusions developed under Phases 1 and 2. The report shall include an overall summary of
the existing conditions of the city's street network, the propased steps to maintain the . existing condition levels, recommendations on street capital projects and the development of
the annual Six Year TIP, and recommendations on budgets and staffing levels to maintain
these efforts. This task will also include incorporation of pertinent created maps and visual
aids.
Roadwav Structural Component Analvsis Option
Detailed Examination of Trouble Segments: Detailed evaluation of four relatively new
roadways that exhibit abnormal deterioration.
This task is centered on field exploration managed by J-U-6 ENGINEERS and performed by a
~ geotechnical engineering firm. This field testing will consist of 8 drill bonngs located at
roadway locations where existing pavements are deteriorating at an accelerated rate. The
product of this field work, laboratory testing and engineering evaluation will be specific
forensic discussions of why the pavements are performing poorly, what can be done now to
mitigate this occurrence, and recommendations for future projects to avoid a similar
outcome.
SERVICES NOT TO BE PROVIDED BY J-U-B AS PART OF THIS AGREEMENT
The Consuttant will not provide the specific services detailed below:
• Original traffic data collection.
• Bridge candition inventory. • Sidewalk inventory. • Comprehensive traffic forecastina nor modeling for future conditions. (Euisting SRTC
modeling will be used:)
. -s- .
*61&e
Val ley
40;000 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 # Spoksne Valley WA 99206
5(?9.921, tQ00 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhallfF?spokanevalley.org
Memorandum
To: Cky Council
From: Neil Kersten, Public Worics Dfrector
CC: Dave Msrcisr. Cfty Manager
DerGe; 4124106
Re: University Road / BNSF Railway Crosaing Quiet Zone
H18tOYy
A smal) gruup uf Spoknnc Valley cititc:ns and Cuunry atTiciuls were instrumentsl in gctUng thc
Washington Stste kgiyi$turc to pass a bill in 1995 allowing cities and counties to enact whistle bans
(akn yuict 7anes) at ccttain railroad crossings. ARer the installation of Suppierwntal Safety Mc,asures
(SSMs) in the facm of non•traversable mcidian9, and complelian uf a safi,Ky study with BNSF Railwuy
mid the Fedcral Railmad Administration (FRA), the County was able to enact a quict zcme gt the
l_►niversity Road crossing in ZO[Hl. According to the FR.A wehsite, there are onl) fivc quiel tones in
thc State of Wast?tingtun.
I'he County's arigina) tiSti1a included rtic<iil►n fT:it7it'(S
wliich cxtendcd frvm 'frent to 200 fect sauth of the
tracks. Tbc Caunty expcrienced problems with people
clriving on tfic wmng side of the median in order to
acccss Fairview Avenue. Thc median also impacted
truck access to an adjacent business. To oddrcs,s these ' • ~
c«ncerns, the Counry shortenai the southern medinn
ircxn 200 to 30 fceL Thc photo Eo the right st►dws the trossing lix*ing northwurd townrds Trcnt.
~ .
FRA Final Rule
In Aptil 2005, the FRA issuod a Fina) Rule un
Locvtnotive Homs at CrossingR which estabtishcd -
fccicral guidelines for quiet zones. "['he FRA natified the
t'ity of the noed to reoew the yuiet tone when the firiat
Rule was issucd. T?ic Public Wurics Dcpartmcnt sent
rencwaJ rtotifcstians in May of 2005 to cantinuc the
yuitti zone txwond the June 24, 2005 c.rpiraticn date.
1'hal renewal will expirc: un June 24, 2006. While n;:esn:hing the rtMuircmenls tor this ywu's
re.newal, we have Iearned thai the existing mc,-ciisns do not comply witb the 1•KA's new definitian af u
SSM. 'The southcrn mcdian shauld bc IOU feet insiead of 30 feet, and the intersec:tinn of Fairview is
closer to the crossing than is allowed by the federa) guidelines.
Options for Renewal
Ihere are twci opticxis under dix;ussion ti,r kceping the yuiet zone.
Option 1-"Ihe City could hire a contractor to rebuild the mcdixn to IUU tcet in length and clene
the interseciioa of f airview/University with concrele barriers. The median would neel to tx
reconsUveiod and the intcrseclion cloyed by the end of May in cxder to comply witti fl 21-day
notification pcriod. We wauld also naxf to notify the fairvicw Avenue rosidents that they will
need to drive east to Bowdish in cmier to entcr ancl exit their neig,hborhoud. We estimatc thai it
will tako approximately five weeks to complete an expedited bidding and construetion proccss.
T3ecause di the tight timeframe, stafl' hav begun preliminnry work on this option to grve the City
the twst pwssible chance to mctt the June 24 dcadlinc in ordeT to avoid interruptiai oFlhe current
(juiet Zeme. However, this preliminary work will nol limil Cuuncil's ability to choose Uption 2
should it wish to do so.
T
N
Q
Z
c
- - ~ ~ ~ - •
+ _ - _
, - y - ~ ~ - -
EXtc~rtrl t)»:~,~~r~,~~ le
►
. , r . .
CIOSf• r'c7IfVIEW WIiH ~ COf)Clef~b~fl7c'!"5
. ~
Optioo 2-Ibe (.ity cauld initiate the longcr approval proc:rss with FRA, WSnOT, the
Washington Utilities and Transpottation Commission, BNSF Railwny, Montana Rail Link, end
Amtrak ta get approval oi the existing mcdian. lliis process would requim hiring a consultam
xnd would likely takc ai ksst six months. Residents ncar the crossing wuuld bc snbjected to
hearing the train whistles during that time periiid. Approximatc:ly 45 trains a dny use the
crossing.
We are titill cliscussing with FKA thc possibility of temporarily clusuig C'airview and ,
Iengthening the median while conducting the study required by Option 2. I'he intent would
bc to re-open the intcrscction at a latc:r date. As af the writing of this memorxndum, it is not
clr:ar whether FRA w711 allow this uourse of aclion.
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 2, 2006 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new bus(ness ❑ public hearing
❑ infumiation ❑ admin. report ❑ pending teg(slatian
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Sign code update
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Ordinance 05-016
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adoption of ordinance 05-016
BACKGROUNO: The city council passed the above ordinance in June ot 2005_ The City has
begun a systematic enforcement effart in 2006 concentrating first on temporary signs. As
expected the enforcement process has raised a number of queMions as the application of the
ordinance and suggests a few changes that would help clarify the intent of the ordinance.
I've attached the Sign Code Enforcement Guidelines issued ta date. They address the following
issues:
1. A frame signs, reader boards and banners
2 Exempt signs
3. Permanent signs vs. portabte signs
4 flags and pennants
5 "auto row" signs,
6. diredional signs,
7. non-conforming rights.
The next step in enforcement is to review and regulate the number of permanent signs allowed
This will raise a number of issues due to the current limitation and the number af pennanent
signs currently in pface.
Finally, I will discuss a number of specific changes to the sign code which the council may want
to consider. They include the following:
1. A definiiian of signs being regulated by the ordinance.
2. And expanded definition oi exempt signs, specifically flags of institutions and
merchandising displays.
3. A definition of permanent signs.
4. Consideration of adding "auto row" signs to the Iist of zxempt signs.
5 An expanded defmition of "directional signs".
6. Clarification of whether or not temporary or portable signs of any kind are granted non-
conforming rights and if any are recognized, establishing a penod to phase out the
same.
Revision of the defnition of nonconforming signs and the verbiage under nonconfortning
rights to ensure uniformity.
8. Phase out af permanent nonconforming sigiis.
If the City council wishes to initiate some adjustments to the sign ordinance the next step would
be to take the proposed changes to the sign committee then back to the planning commission.
OPTIONS: No action or refer specif+c [ssues to the sign committee for consideration.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION. Council direction
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS NA
STAFF CONTACT: Mike Connelly, Marina Sukup
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment One Sign cocie guidelines published to date
i
51Gtd CODE ENF(7RCEPJ1FNf GUIpF.I.INES - 3-2-06
1 A-frame signs that are portable are prohibited. They are nct included in srgns allawed on a
temporary basis. See DeFnition of portable sign, temporary sign and table r" 02'emporary signs
They coutd bs allowed if exempt pursuant ta sectfon 10.07.09 03
2,4 sign affixed permanenUy to a structure Is not a por#able sign and allov:ed if the oiher criteria is
met. For exampfe a sign, regardless of the materfal used, that Is permanentiy attached to the
tront of a building and that would require a building permit is not portable and allowed. A banner
strung between poles or tled to structures ts a portable sign and prohibited unless allowed as a
temporary sign by section 7 02, or is exempt pursuant to sectlon 10.07.09.03.
3 Signs are defined in appendix H of the Intematianal building code adopted by 1he City of Spokane
VaNey as fiollows
a. Any lrttcr, figure, ch:iract4r, tnark, plruie, puiut, uiarquce siLin, design, poster,
pictorial, picture, stmke, stripe, tine, trademark, reading matter or illuminateci
service, which shall be constructed, plgced, attached, painted, erceted, fastened or
manufac:tured in any manner whatsoever, so that the sAmc shall be uscd for thc
attraction of the nubGc to anv^plac:e, subject erson. firm. cotporationLpublic
nerfotmance. articlr. machine or merchandise. whatsoever. which is disnlaved in
anv manr►er outdoors...
This definition includes thc colorcd flags aadlor buntiags put up by many autc~mobile
dealerships and restaurants. These llags are alsu portablc, "not permanentty afTued ta
thc ground or other permancnt structure" (see dcfinition of portable sign). The-se
signs are pi•ohibited pursuAnt to section 10.09.07.02 and could only be put up if :
--l'liey fnll within the listing of excluded signs set forth in Section 10.07.09.03, i.e.,
ufficial signs, seasonal derorationq, mrrrhandise displays, point-of-purchase
:idvertising displays, national :tnd stutc 11ags, ilags of a politicxl subdivision,
symbolic flugs of un intititation, ( linrited [o goverrtntental inslitntiotts) Iegal notices
required by law, barber poles, historic site, monuments/pluqurs, gravestones,
advertisin{; copy a[t'iaced to structures intended for a separate use such as phone
baoths, donation and recycling ennfainrt-r, Iettering or .rymbols applied direclly
onto or flush-mounted mat;netically to a motor vehicle, operuNng in the normal
course of business, political signs supporting political issues, candidates or ballut
measures, replacement of copy on signq othenti•ise permitted, and or other xign't
notcd on 'I'able 7.01 and 7.02.(table O! (ind (1' list several categories as nnl
rt•yuirinR Permits. or
- Iliey are allowcd pursuant to 7.02 with a temporary sign permit. (Bunners, ttgg:s,
pennants, inflatabtcs).
4. 11ie above exceptian for merrhandising d.isplays genernlly applied to signs thut arc
ai'fixeci to the item Ueing sold. Por example balloons attached to cars or baats, lettering in
rar windows or cards placed in the open hoods of vehicles or Icttering attached to a
iiianufactured home or recreational vehicle and are excluded from permitting. Section
i 0.07.nq nz.
Sic1N COraF FNF0RCr-:Mr.-KT Gr_rIDE.1_1NI':S - 1-7-06
I . Signs per4xaanentC4• att.~c}ir~ to I)calCs, 9ig1°kt Slta1~d-S c}r OthC.r PerMarIM s1.rLaMUCS t~rrC
pok~ sigis regardless of ihe niateriiil u~rd. As ageneral nile a sagn is perrtzanetit i9'
a l,uilcfhsg perinit 'ts rc.yuired tar i~s construc:tiorr. `Me riLem ber (I f xx,l~~ igns .1
biisiness n7ay have is limitecl bv ibe cocfe, (See tabk 7.01).
2":l!u[o rcrw" sigtis attached to a pole aet a pole sipi and shouid lic trt~a~ed a,s suc:h,
Directional ;igns, even if° tlic:v contain some insignia of a particuh:s busiiiess cail
be considered excni~t pur-quanx to 10.07.09.030.
Rcader boards ean be iLf`lixed to a pnle a5 fc~ng as the tAtier requirc:rnenu are nleo
and propc:r pemiits issued. iteader sagns cart also bc; n1ad:e intLi monw-nent sigris_
3. irti lieii c,f afiriding of violditioa~ VoIunWy Compliattce AgrecmesiLs n,tay he
,~mtered i.ntn if Li :;pecific pIan to end rhe violation is iri place. Thc term of tho5te
agrecitten~s shr7ul4.[ bc itc, ant}re t11aFi 31:1 days_
S1GN CUVI: ENFUR('FLiFNTc;!_lll)FL(nL:ti 4-08-06
Tti4•o adciitional issues have heen raised.
(ssiie: What types of flags are exemrt from the percuittiniz pruccss''
r'1nswer: 'I'he c.ude exempts "llags uf ins-titutions". Thes< words are nut aelintJ in the
ordinance. The American heritage dictionary defincs institutions as, "an organiz.ation,
csp. one dedicated to public service." CvnsequcntIy, if the: flag represents an existing or
prior pUblic arganization, such as a city, state or country or a civic Urganiz.ation such as
the red cross or boy scouts the tlag would lil:ely full within this cxception. If the tlag
represents a cammercial interest or is piaced sulely to draw attention to and bring
custnmers inta a store it likely would not lae exempt. A final mlst occurs if the flag is
eonsidered sewnnal decorations which are also speciGeully exempt.
Issue: 'I'o what extent are portable signs that lawfully existing prior to the enacUiicnt i,t
the recent code to be considcred nonconfornung and allowed to reruaui''
Answer: This question has come up in ttivo conicxts. The first is whcre a portable sign
such as a reacier board was purchased and used Cor advertisement prior to the enactmcnt
of the Spokane County cade in 1991. (Before that time there was no regulation.)
I3ecause the Spokanc County Cade adopted in 1991 gave nonwnfurming rights onlv to
signs that were, "pcrmancntly instnlled aad IegAlly erected prinr to the adoptiun of
this Codc" and furthcr prohibited portablc signs ouirigfit, such signs sliould not bc
considerecl, at this time, to be signs that were "lawfully ereeted and mainlained" priar tc~
the adoption of our current sign code and as a result have no nonconliorminb rights.
'fhe secund context is raised by portable signs ehat were expressiy allowed pursuant to
the Spokane County Code either as it existed prior to the incorporation of the City of
Spokane Valley or as it was adopicd at the timc uf incotpx►ration. ("I'he City of Spokane
Vallcy aciopted, with vnly minor chungcs, the 2002 Spokane County sign code.)
'Ilic Spokanc County Code in effect prior to 2002, under Section 14.804.020 exempteci
"incidental signs".
Inritlcnt;if signs wrrc: Ltetinecl as t'loIlows:
A smull nonelectric information siga fnur (4) syuare fcct or less in area which
pertains to goods, productg, 9ervices, or facilities which are availabie on t6e
prrmisc.s where thc sign occurs and intendcJ primarily for the conveniencr
of the publir ii-hile on the prrmises.
ThIS 5av11 co& wa.9 ali]ef1ded Lil 2002 1?y flle Unllt1T}', lE C]liilnCayni'd 1ptc Sal,-la' ~:tii1~1]§[lirl~l
foP InCTC7eF1tCd 51g1i9. '4°Jltli tE]U Sai71;- 4jCC1911tr,--s13. I[? 2005 ll1e ri~v1_;cd SVM(._' ti'Csde
elimirsated tZais exernption.
Ass4umvng asign was wi a11uwL:d tic,ncod.iturEniiig sigii Pua-saiu7t tz, tlle iricidcoital
exempti~n prior to tlie adopcion of tlie new codt ir~ 2005; its eonlinuing rion-cotiforitiity
must thrn lae analu~ed urtde.~r ihe Earogua~e of the nvwly a[lopu!d cude, °lhe cr.,de hLts two~
ptro]li?]t pri,lvItillllls. T7t~ fi9`:4i, illL' ~Qfi'e1!tC[}17 41Fa Piti9[l.l`i"7llfi7E'1711f1g
:"y_ sign wtYieh ;v-as lawfulRy er°ec.ted and ttrsainlai~ed an priv.ite.A Praperty
+whiclt now, as a result of c+idc aniendrnertINr duc-4 not iconform in alE
:epplicablc reguE3etions and rrstrictions o#' thi~ chapter.
I llc fat.iEiE 1wigua~,~ t~~is ~r~~'i~i~7n does ~ic~l di5~ir~gt~ish het~,~'r:~.ii ~it~ttal~lt (}r ~iers1z1sslen[
dgns when defttiing what a tionconforciting sign is.
'C`Pte stconci perii[retit pc'ovisiori es Counci tindir $tac itti:ucl-Ing, "31i!i7C17!ljo".-I"c13I1g. a31d
tiEaEes:
Anr- perntanent sign niaclc nnil-conforiiiiltg as a result of tFie .idoption of
tEiese t'egulatious may he rcpxired, bui nttt sii-ucturxlly iilterecl crr rnade morc
noncunForrning in any ir-ay. If the sign Es rernoved in ard+er tv ol:Oke repairs,
i~ shali be r€p1aced vvitEiin sixtv (GU) days, or tlic ~~~rmR[ A ►•nici. y"bcreafter,
st:r -,ign shall cc►nfnrm tca the requiremen#s c,fiikiis sectionw
IN-11le tNN %:ction clearly staces that non-conforming rigl1ts applv to N-rii3~~kniL Signs it is
in c.onflict h°ith the definition set fesrtlti above. Lfntil this conflict is eliminate(l t}iotigli a9l
amt~ndmeret tt) the sigsi coaie i w+aulci not recorru-ierad taking enforccuien!t acti~~ agai.iLSt ~
wEgn:~ ti~al ar-t pri}~~~en ts~ be I~~Nfilly eeccted E~ti~l izi~ntatned
pri~s~ t4 ~h~ ~at,~ of th~
Lidcapiiot7 of oY.1r t7ew stgrl c:ode f7nd ths1t rritel 4hL! urilcna wt for[h in 4he deIinition of an
c•1f3cideT9O 51.LJA
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 2, 2006 City Manager Sign-off
Item: Check ali that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public heanng
information X admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: I'roperty Maintcnance Cttide Update
GOVERNING LEGiSLATION S%'%tc 1 r).1 5.0 1 0(H SVNiC 7.05; SV(11C 1 U.30.1 >Q et seq
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN. tione
BACKGROUND StulT ft;.►s been rc% icwinc: %ariuus code provisiuns prc~ iously adoptrd hy the Cit} to
eliminaic canfusing, inapplicablc: or duplicative provisions. One sueh duplicaiion is tliut the Couneil
-idapted specific provisions addressing nuisnnce violations under SVMC 7.05. 7.I0, and 10. '1i.150. er.ceq.
Each provisicxi w-as drafted nnd considered to address prob(gpns identifitd in our ciry limiI s.
In contrast, the 1997 Internationo) Propcrty hlaintcnance Codr was adopted alang with approximatcly 10
other standardized cadus at the time of incntporation. It is more in the nature of a fallbuck code thnt
jurisdictiuns can adopt in lieu uf draRing Uicir owm. As such, it is accuratc to say that SVMC 7.05, 7.10,
and 10.35.150, et seq. are murr ac:curatc expressions of the approach this City Wti11L5 l0 tAIiC IOwaiCl
nuisance nbatement.
Additionslly, thc intcrnational Pruperty Meintenance Code gets into issucs the Council has declined to
cnter in the past. An example would be the existence of insects in u residcncc. Enforcement of the
Propcrty Maintrnnnec Code could require the Ciry tu inlecvcno, for instance, in a private 1nndlard/tcnnnt
disputc xs to wha is responsible for abatemcnt of'such a condition. Cxistcnce nf insec:ts can he due to a
variety of factors that simply rue nat of a public concern, or ofa public respansibility to sbate.
Given the above, stafT rccommends re{ealing SVMC 10.15.010(II). Staff has attachcd a propoticd
urclinance thai would acc(+mplish that task if the Cuuncil so drsires.
OPTIONS' 1 e:ne IVNIl' I(►.13 0 101111 as it ie;:idopt an ordin:uice. repEalinq tiVM( 10.15.011)(I~1
RECOMMENDED ACT10N OR MOT10N: Consensus tc, forward the proposed orciitsanee to the
Ptanning Commicsion far a public hearing and a recommendatic,n thnt would repc.ll the propcrry
maintenance code.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS NA
STAFF CONTACT: Carv P. Driskell, Deputy City Attorncv; Tom Scholtcns, Liuililing, Official
ATTACHMENTS: Proposed ordinance repeafing the property maintenance code
F'r-,Fv,;cd I)ftAN crdnsncr rcIlcnlliil." 5%'h1(- II) I5.01(}(1i), Itotcr_Ucns] E'rLipcrly !r1nintec1311cC Ci>i!c - C. 1)ruN;clf 03-Q2-cM
c[•rv oF sI'oKAxE v,u.L.Lv
tiPox.aKE COC~';~TY WASEIING'I'ON
()RD[.VANCF. NO. 06-0*''
AN ORll1NANCT nF TIIE CITY OF Sf'OKANF. VAi.LEY, WASHINGTON. REPEALING
SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICII'AL CODE SECTInN 10.150.010(11); PROViDING FnR
SEVF.RABII.ITY AYD AN EFFFC'fIVE llATF..
W}iL'[tEr1S, thc Ciry ndopted Ordinnnce 04-0I0, which adppted certain uniform codes approved
hy the Wasliington Stnte Huilding Code Cottncil; and
"'F-iEREAS, one of the uniform cades adaptcd by refercnce pursuant ta Ordinence 04-010 was
thc lnternationnl Property Mbintenance Code; and
Lvt [ERI:AS, after hvo years of enfacc;ing tlia International Property hlaintenance Codr, the ('it}•
haa dceeritiined that other urdinances and regulations adopted bv the City morr accurately reflect the
pxilicy approach ihe City w•ants to tal+e in relation to praperly maintenance, and that the other ordinances
and reeiilntions providc more effective mechanisms for abatemcnt oEundesirable cdnditions; and
\VIi1:REAS, repealing SVMC 10.15.010(FI) will further the public hralth, safety and welfarc.
NOW l FILkI=F()Rl:, ihe Citti Council of the City of 5pol:ane Valley, Wa.shington, ordains as follows:
Secdon l. Inrent. It is the intent of the City Council far the City of Spokam Vulley to
rrpcal SYMc: 10.I5.010(11), adoption of the lntcrnationnl I'roperty Maintennncc Cade, in its cntircty
hecause the City has deterntined that otlszr orciinances and rebulntions adopted by the City more
accurntely re(lert the policy approach the City w-anLs eo take in roIation to pruperty mnimenancc, and that
the other ardinnnces and regulations provide more effcctive mechru►isms for abatemcnt of undesirabir
conditions on privatc property:
Section t. Snokanc Vallev Mutiicinul Codu section 10.15.010(H) is repealed in its entirety,
'I'he rcmainder of thc SVA4C 10.15.010 is unaffected by this action.
44A-S41444;~he---2003 inteF~t+~~t1---~f+~}-~i~tes+~tr~
5erdon 3. Sevcrabijj!y. I1' any scctian, subsection, scntcnce ur ciausc of this chaptcr is for
any reason held to be invalid, such dccision shall noi uffcct the validity of thc rcntaining provisions of this
chnpter.
Section 4. Effective date. This Ordinanee shall be in full force and effect five days after
publication of tliis OrdinnncC or a summery lhereof occurs in the official newspaper of the City tts
pravidul by law.
P;Lsscd by the City Council this day of June, 2006.
ili,tinaucc-
1 uf 2
.1 DRA Fl' -'r lii!:inUc
A"T`I' F.SI':
City (=lcrk, Christi►ie EI:►inhrid.,.;e
Appruved M Tn Form:
c)rtire of'thc t,itv Att"rncv
Date of PuhEiclrinr,:
Lffective I)::iC
':I -
2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
MeeNng Date: May 2, 2006 City Manager Sign-off~
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ Information X admin. report ❑ pending legis!ation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE- Draft Ordinance regulating use of City Logo
GOVERNING LEGISLATION- RCW 19.77
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Ad hac response to requests to use the City Logo
BACKGROUNO As a result of several requests to use the City's Logo, the Council requested
that staff consider drafting an ordinance that woufd formalize a process whereby members of
the public could better understand how and why the City may, or may not, choose to allow a use
of the lago.
By way of background, the City applied for, and received from the State af Washington,
certification in June 2003 that the logo is a registered trademark of the City. As such, it is
considered a valuable asset of the City, and its use may only be w'rth permission of the Council.
Since that time, any time a person or entity wanted to use the Lago, Council approval must be
obtained
Recentfy, the Council requested that stafT draft a mechanism whereby a more defined process
could be identified and used. The proposed ordinance attached to this RCA would do so. If the
Council agrees wiih the concept, then one of the two choices in Section 5 will need to be
chosen, Staff would then draft a resolution that would be adopted immediately after adoption of
the ordinance that would adopt the style and standards manual that provides the actual
regulations for use_
OPTIONS: Instruct staff to amend the language in the drafl ordinance, or place it on a regular
mesting for a first reading.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Place on future regular meeting agenda for a first
reading.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A
STAFF CONTACT Cary Driskell, Deputy City Attomey; Carolbelle Branch, Public Inf. Officer
ATTACHMENTS- Draft ordinance regulating logo usage
nRnFr
CIT1' (1F SPOILAtiC v:•1LLE1"
SPOkAIVE COUN"TY, WAS1{(NGT4N
nRDINANCE N0. 06-
;1N ORDINAhCI: OF TEIE CfI'Y OF SPUKAIVF: VALLEY, SPOICANE COUIr'TY,
WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING L[h11'1'A1'IUNS ON THE USF, OI"TEiE OFTICIAL C11"Y
I.OGt) OF TIiE CITY OF SPOK.kNE V4LLEY, WASliT1'GTON.
WIIFREAS, the City CounGil established by 1'radcmark, the Ciry of Spokane Vallcy I..oga, «fiich depicis a
muuntnin nnd river with the name of the City of Spokane Vallry. The Trademark wss filed with the Secretaty
of State for the State of Washington on lune 23, 2003; and
WHEREAS. Secretary of State Sam Reed certifed July 1, 2003, that accarding to reconis an filc in his office,
the trademnrk "City of Spoknne Valley with Design", is now duly ret;istcrcd to the Cily of'Spokane Valley, in
the State of Washington file #31639, iSSUCJ lunc 23, 2003 nn(i cxpiring Junc 23, 2009; and
WI1FRCAS, pursuant to RCW 19.77 O 10. as registcred owncr of said Ingo, the City ofSpokatte Vailey ha_v thc
exclusive right to the use of ttte trademrul:; and
WHF:RF,AS, it i; t}ir desire eifthe C'iry Council to estahlitih appropriate criteria to deleflillilZ %vhether to grant
n;qucsis for use of the togo.
NOW, 7'HEREFORE, the City Council oi the City of Spokanc Valley orclsins as follov►•s:
Section 1. Leeislative findinp. 'ilie City Council fmds thut the logo of the City of Spoknne Valley is
a symtwl of the authtirity of the City and is a valuable asset of its population. It is the intcnt of the City
C'ouncil tu ensurc that only appropreate uses az-e made ofsaid City lago.
Section 2. Definition. Unless the eantext clearly requires otlierwise, the detinitian in this section
aEapG4s tiiroughout this chapter. "City Logo" or "logo" means that logo recorded under State of Washington
trademark #31 G49, N+•iih "City of Spoknne Vnlley" and depicting it mountnin and rivcr, w1 illustrated txluw:
S~~/~
j Val iey.
Section 3. Officint i!se. 1 Ise of the ( in• 1~igo shall he far officinl purjx)seti as .pecificnlly set fiorth
helow.
A. fht tollw-~ ine, u;c~. h.mn cccn c\rlicitly tind cxpressly appruvcd without the necd for further City consent:
1. use of logo on any ofticial City of Spokane Valley document, including but not limittd to stntinncry,
letterhead, report and report covers, envelopes, memorandums, f.vices, employee and eiected ofiicials' business
cards, name tags, and n;une plates;
2. use af loga an Student Advisory Cauncil (SAC) letterhead;
3. use of logo by Spokane Area Ecanomic Development Counci) far their mArketing matcrials, on tFieir
wcbsitc. IIIl(I in their printc;d matcriais that are used in re.cruitment, expansion and retention ed'orts fnr
markcting For business attraction und dLvelapmcnt;
4. use of logo by the Greatrr Spokane Vslley Chamber of Commecce for City of Spokane Valley
promotion through the ChamEx;r's map;
5. usc of Iogu by thosc ulTicinlly involved with anJ for the planning, promoting nnd decorating
connected witb the annual Mayor's Ball, includiag but not [imited to evcnt wine glasses, napkins, tickets,
invitntians, and other promotional materials and decorations far the l3all;
6, use of loro by Purrfeit Logos for apparel purch:tsed by city emplovees and elected officials,
Vr.f+ni'tcC L!':t(t, itY LoL,,. I 1 _1,,, :'u,r 1 ! i
DItAFf
lrc•vid?d chose purchnses are ttansnctrd while those employcxs und elected officiaLs are still scrving in th: ic
~ I ies; and
use of Iago by those officially invotved with and for the planning of Vullzyfest nnd accompanyin-,
!Udlll~-, hlll Il(!t lImttu-d fit C\'Ctl[ dCC[!t'1f1n17`:, (iroflloiGlfl:il t11YIl'Cll.k, ad,'CT1;tic'lllclli,, (1+JstcrC, 311~
~ ~ rnporary signs
B.. T}1C IO~,Ta tT1:lt', 14!Ifl l lly;!pj'n nL';11, h: ±l;cd C w21(:r ~i~:: fll~ Ct CRI> (h. tIfi,:
. ;~~1~)1~1\_t~ tt~.:' !!S:' ~ i!`• ~`1'.~ `•Il~t~~ .~I~r 'll .f~.:~~t~.ll1tC 11:If1 II1: l_ ~?~l ~>~~i)}.![ll~~.~~iC1~_>;,,~ ~'.~~Ri~i'r
titandards Ciuidc, which shali bc appruved by scparatc rrsulutii M
D. 'i'hc City logo shall not he used an or in connection with an) advern:;ing or promution i~~r any proxluLt.
husiness, orgpnizatiott, service, or artirlc, whethcr ot3ered for salc for prafit nr nfl`ered «-ithout charge, NN ithont
the exptessconsen2 ofth. r 11N (•,tlfl_ li E};C Ii+';'o ~fl:ill ll''t ill CO113it'C31cI[1 %\1II) .1IV) ti~:(It~il t":1ti, I'f
,:ampaign cclnted thereto
F. [t is et violation of Ihis cheptcr tu usc uny Symbul tiiat iniitatrs ttte logo or that is
.ippearunce of the togo, or in any manner tbat would Ix an impropcx use of thc logo it5e 1 t
F. Nothing in this cheptcr shnll prohibit thc rcpraduction ofthe City Logo fiQr illustrative !1,:
rnedia iftlte repruciuctian by the news meciia is incidrntal to the pub[ication or the broacica.st
hap%cr shnll pruhibit a charaeterir.ation of ttte city lago frvm txing used in politicat cartoons
Scction a. Nenaltv for violntion. Any persvn who vialstes this ch3pter shnll bc subjtLt tu any ancl ..,1 l
rcm~ ci:c; nvaiLahle tn thc C'ity unrler thr Iau•, includine bitt not limited tn a sitit fiir d;tmsges an<.1/or tnjitrt. tit _
r~1i~1
u>~OPIYUN ONE- Any reyuest fur usc at the City Logu shall bc aubmitted in wriling to tllc Cit} ( iI,
i or Jr;igner), at lcast 10 days in advance of the d9te needed. 7he Maynr, in cansulwtion witli thc ,I~
`,lanager, shall ciccide whether thc requestcd use sha(1 be approved by the City. The ('in• ('ferk Sha11 srn,!
Nmtrt n iesPonse to the requestor within three businrss dnys of the dccision by the
c)f'?'I011'77VO-1\ny request foruse c,fthe City Logo shall bc submiried in «r:cu e i:N
(.-r designee), at tea5t 20 d,zy5 in advxnce of thr dnte necrlcd. 'i flc matter tihall f,;: p(a,~;l oll a~u}~;:c~~.:..•~,~
tilxoming Caimcil agenda for considcmti, -ii.
Scrtlon 6. Severxbilitv_. [fany sCLii0it. ,~nt~r;~~•, I-i.tLlSC O[ ltflf:~,A IiIfti l117dlfl:l'!l'(: iti::li bL: ill'ld'
h; im:ilid or unconstitutionA) by a court ofcompetrnt jurisdictian, such invuliditv or uncanstitutianalitysh,.'
~~-a .it't:., t the validity or constitutiunality aFarry oiher section, sentence, clause or phriLia of this ordinanc~
SecNon 7. Efl'ective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full forcc and cffect five (5) day5 aj-
p+:hlication c?f this Ordinance or a summary thercof in the official newspaper of the Citv.
PAStiE.il bN the c,it% (_~otiFwil thi, (l:iti nf
L?sana Wilhite. 1taNor
I1RA fT
\i IE:ti~
('liristine Rainhridgc, l'itti Clrrk
.1pproved as to Purm:
(_)tlire at'ihc t_ itN ,1ttOrncV
i )atc of Puhlicmfun:
T (t~~: ti. r D,~cc:
I
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Councii Action
Meeting Date: May 2, 2006 City Manager Stgn-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent [D old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ infarmation M admin. report ❑ pending IegislaUon
AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Hazard Inventory Analysis Report
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: 44 CFR 201
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None
BACKGROUND: In October 2004 Staff was informed that a Hazard Inventory and Vulnerability
Analysis was required to be developed and approved prior to any federal disaster mitigation
funding being made available to our City.
The Comrnunity Development Department began working with our Fire Chiefs and Police Chief
to develop this plan. Although our plan was moving forward, we were later informed that the
plan was going to be a Spokane County wide analysis.
~ In September 2005 Staff became involved with the Spokane County Hazard Mitigation
Committee, formed at the request of Spokane City/County Emergency Management
Department, and participated with that committee to develop a Draft Mitigation and Objectives
plan (Plan).
Minutes of those meetings, the Plan, a Comment Sheet as well as other information may be
viewed at the Emergency Management link;
httD://www.sDokanecountv,oratemercenCVMCIMttMD.asD
OPTIONS: Provide input into the Plan using the Comment Sheet.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: None at this time ,
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None at this time
~
STAFF CONTACT: Building Official Scholtens
ATTACHMENTS
PowerPoint
Public PresentationlComment PowerPoint: ~
Hazard Inventory and
Vulnerability Analysis
UPdate: 02 May 2006
azard Inventory and Vulnerability
P!Analvsis: U
pdate
te
• The Department of Homeland Security
mandates that this be a county wide plan.
. As such, this plan may lack specifics that the
City may add to any Iocal mitigation plan to
address local vulnerability or increased levels
of hazard.
• The plan may identify hazards that do not
directly apply to the City.
1
Hazard Inventory and Vulnerability
Analysis: Update
• Last report made to City Council was a
memorandum dated 2.21.06
• In that report the work of the Spokane
County Hazard Mitigation Committee was
outlined.
• The first phase of that work is now completed
and the initial plan has been completed for
review.
Hazard Inventory and Vulnerability
Analysis: The Plan
SPOKANE COUNTY
ALL HAZARDS MITIGATION PLAN
,
GOALS AND OBJECTNES
Goal: PREVENTION
• Reduce the risks assodatad with natural and human caused hazards
through mitigation plannlng.
• Create and mair►tain a syatem that evaluaMs rtatural and human caused
hazards and their potentiel for risk to Iile, health and propeRy.
• Encoura9e publk and prtvate cooperaNon in diaaster mitigatan planning.
• Insure that all local land developmern plans and rogula6ons lessen the
impact of potential nalural and humen caused disasters.
2
~
zard Inventory and Vulnerability
IrAnalysis: The Plan
Objectives
• Develop a continuously revesed data base that identifies and objectively
prioriUzes natural and human caused hazards.
• Establ(sh a method for collecting and comparing data ebout aY hazards.
• Educata the public about hazard risks, avoidanoe and mitigation.
~ Ensure that there is consFstency and coordina6on between critical areas
plans, poficiea and regulations and belween Jurisdic6ons.
• Reduce financial and social impacts through provention.
• Identffy gaps in poteMial response and protection activities and find
resourcas to cbse these gaps.
• Implement an earry waming system.
1 lAnalysis: azard Inventory and Vulnerability
The Plan
- Goal: PROPERTY PROTECTION
• Protect crkical publlc facilities and Inirastructuro from possible damape do to
hazerds.
• Redute the impad of hazards on the built envlronment.
I
3
,
Hazard Inventory and Vulnerability
Analysis: The Plan
• Objectives
• Encourage and suppaR defensible space and proventive canskuction
practices.
• Rromote the use of appropriabe hazard roslstanoe strudural methods for
buildings.
• Promote fndividual and family planning for property protaction.
• Working wkh developers review laM uae ordinances and infrashucture
todes to ensura that they include adcquete property protection.
• Identify portions o( lfie buik anvlronment that share common hazard
vulnerabllity.
• Harden and seare all e6senNal critical facilities.
• Promote parsonal Firawise plans.
• Plan fof adequate aocesa and egresa.
• Consider inpads of naturel hazards on luture land use.
Hazard Inventory and Vulnerability
Analysis: The Plan
Goa/: PUBLIC EDUCATION AND AWARENESS
• Inauro that all Gtlnena, Including Uwse with special neads, aro awaro of
potential hazard5 and disaster preparedness.
Ob%@CW@S
• Educata the publlc about emergency preparedness ar►d prevention,
• Devebp a dlsaster preparedneaa public information program to be
disseminated by the media, neighbofiood groups, mail and xhool.
• Promote personal tESponsibility for disasMr preparodnesa. ~
• Improve the pubNc's understanding o( lfie location and potential impacts of
natural hazards.
• Develop a plan to address the needs of atizens who may not be ab[e to
;t' pra;ide their o,on transportatioa
4
_ ,
Hazantory and Vulnerability
W=rdlnve
An
alysis: The Plan
, PUBUC EDUCATION AND AWARENESS
ObjecGves (continued)
• Teach disaster preparedness In the public achools.
• Create tha oppoRunity for agenties and busineases to cooperate In
communicating the need for preparednesa.
• Recruit busJness, civic baders and chldren's groups to participete in
communicating the need }or preparodness.
I
- _ '~.r., .I
Hazard Inventory and Vulnerability
Analysis: The Plan
Goal: NATURAL RESOURCES
• Balence natural resource proservation with fife, property and safety
protaction.
Objectives
• Advocate 'best management" pradices for development to reduce potential
losses from disasters.
• Reduce confticts between high intansity land uses and natural hazards.
• Review aquifer protection regulations.
• Maintain the natural aystems tfiat provide flood protectfon, i.e., shorelines
and wedands.
• Restrfct development in critical areas where hazaMs exist.
• Promote projecis that mitigate Impads on the environmant.
5
Hazard Inventory and Vulnerability
Analysis: The Plan
° EMERGENCY SERV/CES
• Insure effective and efficient emergency response and recovery capablllties
to raduoe the loss of Ilfe and property durtng and after a disastar.
• Establish and malnWln a roliable oommunlcatlons system between public
responders and with the general public during a disaster.
• Insure that citizens, Including those with spedal needs, can effecc:tiively
avacuate irom potential disasters.
Hazard Inventory and Vulnerability
~ Analysis: The Plan
Objectives
;;x';~~ ; • Ensure the county-wide distribution of emergency supplies.
• Croate a registry of people who have spedal needs,
+ ` • Pre-deploy eme en su
~r rg cy pplies to varlous geographic locatlons.
• Implemant and davelop a joint informatlon plan for EDC.
• Share communica6on protocols between agencies
• Provide power badc-up and system operabllfty during a disaster.
• Evaluate and update Information on the capacity of food banks and shelters.
• Create neighborhood level disaster plans and ooordfnate these with city and
reganal plans.
• EnCOUrage NOAA radio ownership.
• Ensure that all communications to the public is consistent,
• Oevelop mutual aid plans for public works and code enforoement programs.
6
r=ntory ard Inveand Vulnerability
~ Analysis: The Plan
Goal: STRUCFURAL PROJECTS
• Support fhe bWlding of strudural proJects that will slgnlficaMisr reduce the fmpact
of hazards but Ihat do not create additional ernironmental fiarm.
Objectives
• Develop deslgn standard for earthquakes, floods and winds.
• Evaluate buiklings, brldgeL, aitical fadliUes end other stn,ctures for hazar0
resisianoe.
• Promote badcup Mgress and egross for wildland/urban intertace zonas.
• Evaluate exlsting thoroughfares tor potentially hazartlous situatlons.
• IdeMify any potenUal evacuation borilenecks,
• Ideritify potentiel impad of dam feilures for polentfal risks to property and I"rfe.
• Create incerrtives to uQgrade ebstng buildings.
• Expedite approval processea for projects that improve strudural resistance to
hazards.
• Rev(ew hazendous materlals transportatfon requiremenls.
Hazard Inventory and Vulnerability
~ Analysis: Next Steps
The Plan is put "on the street° for public comment.
• If changes are required in response to the
comments, the changes will be made and then the
Plan is presented to the Washington Emergency
Management Division (EMD) for review.
• Subsequently approval is gained as the Plan is then
forwarded to the Federal U.S. Department of
Homeland Security.
7
Hazard Inventory and Vulnerability
Analysis: Next Steps
t:
Finally, after all approval is gained at the state and
? national level the Plan comes back to the local
jurisdictions including the county governments and
`,T~ city governments fvr approval.
The Plan really needs to be approved as it then
would stand, by resolution, without any changes.
• Final approval will enable our local J'urisdictions to
participate in Federal Pre Disaster Mitigation Grant
funding to specifically address those hazards
identified in the Plan and rmporfant to Spokane
Va!ley.
Hazard Inventory and Vulnerability
1 Analysis: Conclusion
In tonight's presentation we covered:
• Requirement of making a county wide plan.
• General characteristics of the plan.
• Details the Spokane County All Hazards
Mitigation Plan.
• Plan approval process.
• Questions?
8
SP4KANE COUNTY
HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
L: u WILDFIRE TORNADO ~ 1, rL O!~ r
k, -
* ~
.
. -
•r ,
SOME HAZARD FACTS
• Nationally, the
wildland fire season ~ '<;'~`:l' . -
of 2000 was worst
since 1910 with
7,000,000 acres
burned costing
>
$1,6009000,000.
1
,
SOME HAZARD FACTS
• The 1996 ice
storm caused
four deaths and
$22 million in y ~ 14''~
r fy
damage in
~
Spokane County.
S4ME HAZARD FACTS
• There have been three declared flood
disasters in Spokane County since
1980.
' . • ~i
~ i,-~►,, . e:tr- . , f - ,
1z
I
I
2
J
I
SOME HAZARD FACTS
~ In June 2001, a
3.5+ earthquake
struck Spokane
- 3:
WHAT A HAZARD
MITIGATION PLAN DDES
• Creates a set of actions to:
- Reduce damages caused by natural
and human caused disasters
- Save lives ~I, - Improve disaster response
- Receive grants for disaster
preparedness -
f=• '~i;,'.
3
HAZARD MITIGATION
PLANNING PROCESS
1. ORGANIZE RESOURCES TO
CONDUCT THE PLANNING
PROCESS
2. ASSESS RISK
3. DEVELOP A MITIGATION PLAN
4. IMPLEMENT AND MONITOR THE
P LAN
~
THE HAZARD MITIGATION
COMMITTEE HAS
.1. SET PLAN GOALS
2. DEVELOPED PLAN
OBJECTIVES
3. CREATED A
L PRELIMINARY SET
OF ACTIONS
THEY NEED YOUR
HELP IN SE7TING
PRIORITIES!
4
WHAT CAN YOU DO?
1. FILL OUT A QUESTIONNAIRE
2. ATTEND A FUTURE MEETING
WHERE THE PLAN IS PRESENTED
OR REVIEW IT AT YOUR LOCAL
LIBRARY.
J
wl_ '
- ~
SPOKANE COUNTY
HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
,
Ey,WILDFIRE ~ TORNADO`~4s' ` FL¢ D
I~
ti -
5
YOU, TOO, CAN HELP
PREVENT DISASTER DAMAGE
I
Please help the Spokane County
Hazard Mitigation Committee
Spokane County's Hazard Mitigation Committee has received a grant
to prepare an all hazards mitigation plan. The committee has been I
formed to assist in the preparation of this plan. The planning effort
will identify actions to reduce damages created by natural hazards.
These hazards include wildland fires, floods, earthquakes, tornados
and high winds, winter storms, and landslides. The committee asks
you to assist them in the identification of problems associated with
these hazards and suggest solutions to these problems.
Some Hazard Facts
o Nationally, the 2000 fire season was the worst wildland fire season
since 1910 with nearly 7,000,000 acres burned costing
$1,600,000,000.
o Human activity is 7 times more likely to be the cause of a wildland fire
than lightning strikes
o In 1996, an ice storm caused four deaths and $22 million dollars in
damage in Spokane County.
o Flooding in Spokane County has caused the declaration of a disaster
three times since 1980.
o In June 2001, a 3.5+ earthquake struck Spokane.
What can you do to help? Turn the sheet over and find
out.
~
Your ideas are important!!! Use the space below to list your most
important issues concerning hazard damage management or write
comments, draw or sketch anything else you would like to say about
the hazards listed on the front in Spokane County.
Thank you for your time and ideas. Please return this comment sheet
to your committee member or send it to Fred Hurand, Department of
Urban Planning, Public and Health Administration, 668 N Riverpoint
Blvd., Spokane, WA 99202, or Email it to fhurand@mail.ewu.edu.
$06 &ne
,;OoVal1ey 11707 E Sprague Ave Sulte 106 ♦ Spokane VaUey WA 99206
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org
wm~
Memorandum
To: Dave Mercier, City Manager and Members of Council
From: Morgan Koudelka, Administrative Analyst
Date: May 2, 2006
Re: Purchase of Valley Prectnct
Introduction
The Valley Precinct building, located at 12710 East Sprague Ave., was purchased (along with the
parcel of property) and renovated by Spokane County ("County") prior to the incorporation of the
City of Spokane Valley (`City"). The original purchase price was $2.4 million. The City currently
occupies approximately 56% of the building (12,197 sq. ft. out of 21,780 total sq. ft.), utilizing the
facility for law enforcement and court services provided by the County under contract with the
City.
The City and County entered into an agreement to allow for the City's continued use of the
building. The City was presented with the option of purchasing a portion of the premises equal to
the percentage it utilizes for its law enforcement operations (56%). The City was credited with
prior contributions in the form of tax payments made by citizens to the County prior to the
incorporation of the City. This credit was calculated using population estimates and resulted in the
City receiving a credit of $975,046 as shown below.
City of Spokane Valley Contribution to Premises Purchase
Facility Purchase aod Renovation Costs $2,400,000
Divided by:
Uninoorporated Population at Time of Pnrchase 241,849
Equals:
Per Unincorporated Capita Cast of Facility $11.89
Multiply by:
City of Spokane Valley 2003 Population 82,005
Equals:
City of Spokane Valley Contribution $975,446
Purchase of Valley Yrecinct
May 2, 2006
Page 2 of 4 I
The City was given the option of using this credit towazd the purchase of the premises or drawing
down this credit by leasing the premises. The City has been drawing down this credit through
leasing 56% of the premises beginning in June of 2003. The price per square foot was $9.00 for
the yeazs 2003 and 2004 and was to be adjusted annually thereafter according to the Consumer
Price Index (CPI). The following table shows that the sum of the City's lease payments from
June of 2003 through May of 2006 will be $335,956.20
Spokane Valley Precinct Building Lease Costs Through May 2006
Year !_per sq. ft. SV Square Foota e~ Annual Cost
2003 (7 months) $ 9.00 12,197 $ 64,034.25
2004 $ 9.00 12,197 $ 109,773.00
2005 $ 9.29 12,197 $ 113,310.13
2006 (5 months) $ 9.61 12,197 $ 48,838.82
$ 335,95620
Citv Pnrchase of 140% the Vallev Precinct Premiscs
The total purchase price of the Valley Precinct premises remains $2.4 million. '1'hc City now has
the financial means to consider purchasing the premises. Both City and County staff have
expressed a preference for a 100% ownership scenario. The County is agreeable to considering the
City's purchase of 100% of the premises, with the County leasing the space it will continue to
occupy, as long as the County does not have to make any lease payments in the near future.
This memo will consider the purchase of the precinct premises on June 1, 2006. At that time, the
full purchase price of the Valley Precinct premises for the City wil( be $1,760,910 after factoring
in the remaining credit (as shown below).
Purchase Price oi 100% of Valley Precinct on June 1,1006
jSpokane Valley Credit 5 975,046
r----------________ - -
~Total Lease Amount Paid by SV to County (335,956)
~ Remaining SV Credit (Applicable boward Purchase Prlce) $ 639,090 ~
. ,
_ - ,
Precinct Building Cost $ 2,400,000 Remaining SV Credit ; (639,090)-
_ . - -
Purchase Price of 100%of Valley Precin-ct
- j S 1,760,910 j
Once the City executes the purchase of the facility, the CoLuity will continue to occupy 44% (9,583
sq. ft.) of the facility and be assessed lease charges adjusted annually according to the annual
average of the CPI. The following table estimates the County lease charges. ,
I
~
Purchase of Valley Precinct
May 2, 2006
Page 3 of 4
Projected County Lease Charges
Lease Year Lease Rate' Sq. Ft Annual Leaae
2006 (7 months) $ 9.61 9,583 $ 53,721
2007 9.90 9,583 94,872
2008 10.20 9,583 97,747
2009 10_ 50 9,583 100,622
2010 10.82 9,583 103,688
2011 11.14 9,583 106,755
2012 11.47 9,583 109,917
2013 11.82 9,583 113,271
2014 12.17 9,583 116,625
2015 12.54 9,583 120,171
2016 12.92 9,583 123,812
2017 13.30 9,583 127,454
Total $ 1,268,653
' Estimated 3% annuai rate increase with rate rounded to nearest hundredth
-Actual rate will vary according to avg. annual CPI increase
Maintenance of the premises is curnently provided by the County with the City paying for actual
costs (of its portion of the premises) through a settle and adjust agreement. The scenario would be
reversed under this purchase agreement, with the County making estimated payments to the City
throughout the year and reconciling to actual costs after year-end. The estimated maintenance
costs are as follows.
Spokane County Maintenance Charges •
Year a
2006 (7months) 34,880
2007 63,382
2008 67,185
2009 71,216
2010 75,489
2011 80,018
2012 84,819
2013 89,909
2014 95,303
2015 101,021
2016 107,083
2017 113,507
Tota I 983,812
' Based on 2006 estimate of $59,794.33 and 6% annual increase
according to avg. annual County increase for all contracts
Purchase of Valley Precinct
May 2, 2006
Page 4 of 4
The City will make an initial down payment of $500,004 to the County, leaving a remaining
balance of $1,260,910. The County will draw down the remaining balance through lease chazges
only and pay for the maintenance charges separately. Under this scenario, the County would begin
making lease payments to the City in December of 2017 (according to estimated lease charges,
subject to change according to actual lease rates) as shown in the following table.
Spokane Valley
Purchase Indebtedness Year-End Balance
~Purchase Price 1,760,916
Initial Down Payment (500,000)
Remaining Balance 1,260,910
2006 (7 months) ` (53,721) $ 1,207,189
2007 (94,872) $ 1,112,318
2008 (97,747) $ 1,014,571
2009 (100,622) $ 913,949
2010 (103,688) $ 810,261
2011 (106,755) $ 703,507
2012 (109,917) $ 593,590
2013 (113,271) $ 480,319
2014 (116,625) $ 363,694
2015 (120,171) $ 243,523
2016 (123,812) $ 119,710
2017 (127,454) $ (7,743)
Ending Balance $ (7,743)
' Remaining balance is drawn down by lease charges to Spokane County I
" County would begin making payments to City in December, 2017
- Lease cost based on 2006 rate of $ 9.61/sq. ft.at 12,197 sq. ft. and 3% annual increase
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meedng Date: 05-02-2006 City Manager Sign-off: I
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Council Budget Items
This item will give Council an opportunity to discuss any budget issues they wish to
raise at this time. The conversation is anticipated to include consideration of the
services of a lobbyist to research and pursue legislatives issues in Olympia andlor
Washington, D.C.
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT:
ATTAC H M ENTS
DRAFT
ADVANCE AGENDA
For Planning Discussion Purposes Unly
as of April 27, 2006 8:15 a.m.
Please nole lhis is a work in progress; items aze tentative
To: Council & Staff
From: City Manager
Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings
Mav 9. 2006, Regular Meetiug. 6:00 p•m• [due date Thurs, Apri127[
1. Consent Agenda: Minutes, Claims, Payroll, Resolution setting Planning Commission
Public Hearing for Street Vacation [S minutes]
2. Second Reading, Amended Ordinance Re Off-road Vehicles - Cary Driske(1 [ 15 minutes]
3. Motion Consideration: Contract Award for SpraguelAppleway Subarea Plan - Marina Sukup/
Scott Kuhta [15 minutes]
4. Motion Consideration: Consultant Services Agreement for the Street Master Plan - Neil Kersten [5 minutes]
5. Motion Consideration: Hearing Examiner Agreement - Morgan Koudelka [5 minutes]
6. Administrative Reports: (a) CenterPlace Technology - Mike ]ackson [10 minutes]
7. Information Only: (a) Storage Tank - Tom Scholtens; [estimated meeting: 55 minutes*]
Mav 16. 2006, Studv Session, 6:00 p•m• [due date Thurs, May 4)
1. Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) Program - Bruce Hamner, Fire District # 1 (15 minutes)
2. Report: Ad Hoc Right-of-Way Committee - Tom Scholtens (20 minutes)
3. Proposed 2006 Budget Amendment - Ken Thompson (20 minutes)
4. Geiger Agreement Discussion - Cary Driskell (15 minutes)
5. Appeal Fees - Cary DriskelUMike Connelly (15 minutes)
6. Advance Agenda - Mayor )
7. Council Check-in - Mayor ) 5 minutes
8. City Managcr Comments Dave Mercier ) TOTAL MINUTES: 90 minutes
May 23, 2006. Regular Meetint. 6:00 .m. [due date Thurs, May 11 j
1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2007-2012 Transportation Improvement Plan ('1'IP) [15 minutes]
2. PUBLIC HEARING: 2006 Amended Budget [ 15 minutes]
3. Consent Agenda: Minutes, Claims, Payroll [S minutes]
4. First Reading, Proposed Ordinance Amending SVMC Title 10, ConsGvction Work and Activity
Within Right-of-way (SVMC Title 10.05.070-10.05.250)- Tom Scholtens/Cary Driskell [15 minutcs]
5. First Reading, Proposed Ordinance Amending 2006 Budget - Ken Thompson [10 minutes]
6. Motion Consideration: Gei er A eement - Cary Driskell [ 15 minutes
8. Administrative Reports: Proposed 2007-2012 TIP [with public comment] [20 minutes]
9. Information Only: Department Monthly Reports [estimated meeting: 105 minutes*]
Mav 30.2006 - Dav After Memorial dav Holidav - NO MEET'ING
June 6, 2006, Studv Session, 6:00 a.m. [due date Thurs, May 251
1. SRTC Traffic Impact Study - Neil Kersten (25 minutes)
2. Advance Agenda - Mayor )
3. Council Check-in - Mayor ) 5 minutes
4. City Manager Comments - Dave Mercier ) TOTAL MINUTES: minutes
Draft Advance Agenda 41272006 8:14 AM1 Page 1of 2
June 13. 2006. Regu[ar Meeting, 6:00 p.m. [due date Thu rs, June 11
1, PLBi..IC HEA.R]1V"G: Cablc Franchise-Morgan Koudelka [45 minutes]
2. Consent Agenda: Minutes, Claims, Payroll [5 rninutes]
3. Secand Reading Proposed Ordinanee Amending 2406 Budget - Ken Thoznpsan [10 rninutes]
4. Second R.eading, Proposed (7rdinance Asnend ing SVMC TitIe 10, CpnStrUCt10n WOCk aild Act'ivlty
Within Ri,ght-of-vday (SV,'iC 7'itle 10.05.070-10.05.250 -"Tom ScholtenslCary Driske11 [15 rr►inutes]
5. First Reading Proposed Ordinance for Street'4'acation ST`V 01-06 - Karen Kend$1( [5 rninutes]
6. Proposed Resolu#ion A.dopting 2007-2012 TIP - Steve Worley [10 minutes] .
7. Cable Frsnchise Z.Jgdate - IVlorgan Krau€ielka [10 rrrinu#es]
[estimated meeting; 100 minutes*]
Sa#. June 17. 2006. Pvvlid-Year Council}Staff Retr'eat (Councilmem ber Yleneony's Cabln)[dHe Thu rs,1VLay 251
7"exrtative €rgerda iterrxs incluie.•
Updated Finarrcr`c~l Foreeast Coumcil Goafs~'r~r 2006 (mb-ar'eapTanning?)
Counci1 C"roafs for 2007 Annexatr`on Appraaches
Busine.s.s Plant~~~g Temp{u1e
(AWC .9n,aual Conference, June 20-23, 2046) -
June 20. 20Ob, Studv'Sessioo. 6;00 P-m- (posstbOry~fcanced,fdraon duaroAWC M-eetr,ag) [due dsete'Thurs,June8]
June 27. 2UIM6. Regular PVIeetrn.l. 6.00 p.m. Idne da#e Thurs, JUOe 151
1. Cvnsent Agenda: Minrates,, Claims, Payroll [5 nninutcs]
2. First Iteading Proposed Ordinance for Street Var~ation STV 0 1-06 - Karert fCendall [5 minutes]
3. Mcstion Consideration; Cost vf Living ,P►djustment for Nan-represented Ernpl,ayees - Llave Mereier [5 min]
4_ Infornnation C}nly: De_partment Montftly Reports
[l'TEEER PF,"T~G AN$JOR UFCO14L[NG ISSUESfNEEETINGS:
Traffic, TratlEic Lights, and Speed Limits I)iscussion --NeiI ;Kersten
Joint SoCC and +City Cavncil Meeting Regarding Joint Pfanning Agt'eernent and Conttt'n[ir~~
Pandemic Respons: S#rategies - Fire District #1 Chief Mike Thompson
Prisrn./P1usfPadal (Pa.t`cel Data Locator) 5ystem - Chris Berg -
Central Valley Schvo l D istrict Impact Fee Request
Proposed Sidevvalk Ordinan.ce
Sewer Collection Systems - Neil Kersten
SEPA Mitigation Strategies -Cary DriskellfGreg McCvrmicklNeil Kersten
Planned Unit Develogment (P[JD) Policy Issues - Marina SukUpIMike Connelly
Da lt Stedman, Jerry i_.enzi - to report on the NonkhlSouth Freeway
estimated m.eetutg time does ntst indude iime for public comments]
C)eaft Advance Agenda 4l27,2006 9_14 Ah4 Pagc 2 0f 2
S~Tpokane
,;OO%11ey 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 * Spokane Yalley WA 99206
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 * cityhaftspokanevalley.org
Informational Memo
To: Dave Mercier, City Council
From: Nefl Kersten, Inga Note, Steve Worlsy
CC:
Date: 4125106
Re: Broadway Avenue Resurfacing Project
Introduction
The resurfacing of Broadway Avenue from Bates Road to Sullivan Road is scheduled to
begin in June this year. Tnis federally funded project consists of grinding 2" off the existing
road sttrface and replacing it with new asphalt and then restriping the roadway back to its
curnent 41ane configuration.
In response to a request from Council the Public Works Department wanted to provide an
overview of the traffic and safety issues associated with the cwrent 4lane striping of
Broadway Avenue. We also wanted to discuss the potential of restriping Broadway Avenue
to a 3-lane section to reduce the number of collisions and provide more pedestrian safety
along this principal arterial.
Background
Over the last several years there have been a significant number of accidents at intersecrions
along Broadway, due mainly to the cuirent 4-lane configuration and the lack of visibility for
eastbound and westbound left-turning traPfic. Typicalty the rate of "accidents per miUion
entering vehicles," or AcclIVIEV, is used to compare the total oumber of accidents to tha
traffie volucnes at any particular loeation. An AcclMEV rate greaier than 1.0 indieates a
problem that should be addressed. I
Oae way to address this issue is to roconfigure Broadway Avenue to a 3-lane section. This
allows left-turning traffic to get out of the through lane while waiting for an opening in on-
coming traffic, thus reducing the potential for rear-ead collisions. It also provides improved
visibility of on-coming traffic for left-turns at intersections. 11tis significantly raduces the
collision potential at cross streets.
The following table highlights some of the differences between a 4-lane street and a 3-lane I
street.
I
Informational Memo Apri125, 2006
Broadway Avenue Resurfacing Project Page 2
Issne 3-I.ane 4-Lane ~
Capacity Before and after studies of conversions from 4 to 3 lanes in Seattle show either configuration can
carry 18,000 ADT or more.
I,ocal 11,500 ADT: Grand - 32°d to 38`h
Capacity 12,900 ADT: 29" - High Dr. to Grand 11,000 ADT Iiroadway - Park to Sullivan
Examples
15,800 ADT: Albert.a - Driscoll to Francis 18,300 ADT Wall - Monroe to Cascade Way
24,738 ADT: Cntry Hms Blvd, w of Wall
Vehicle Seattle study of 16 conversions resulted in a Rate > 1.0 ace/MEV indicates a pmblem.
Safety 27% reduction in collisions. Broadway/Argonne - 1.0 acc./NIEV
Comects through-left collision pattern at Broadway/Mullan - 1.1 acc.lMEV
McDonald. Broadway/University - 1.9 acc./MEV
Broadway/McDonald - 1.3 accJMEV
Rroadway/Evergreen - 0.8 acc./NIEV
compare to Sprague.nJniv - 1.7 acc./!V1EV
► ~ ~i-
~
~-t
Provides TWLTL for turns to side streets and
driveway.
Longer wait to exit driveways but residents
can back into TWI,TL Many sideswipe and rear-end collisions caused by
turning vehicles.
Residents back out into through lanes.
Bike Room for 5' bike lanes. Broadway identified No bike lanes without wideiiing and purchasirig
in the Comprehensive Plan as bikelpad. roate additional R/W
Pedestrian Bike lane provides buffer betw•een sidewalk Existing 4' sidewalk is nazrow, many power pole
and traftic lanes. obsUvctions, and adjacent to trai~ic lane.
Speeds Single through lane regulates speed in Two through lanes allows high-speed vehicles to
residential rteighborhood. pass.
Schools Kids cross 2 through lanes. Kids cross 4 through lancs.
(Summit, Allows center median islands for safer No room for median islands at crosswalks.
Pros.,~ess) crosswalks.
Parents block through lane while turning into drop-
TWLTL provides queuing area for parents off driveway.
turning into drop-off driveway.
Mail & Bike Lane provides partial shoulder for mail Mail trucks and buses stop in traa•el lane, greater
Transit deliveries and transit stops. potential for sideswipes, rear-ends.
Emergency Can travel in TWLTL. Must wait for vehicles to move into curb lanc.
Vehicles
Signal MeDonald - no change, east + west traffic MeDonald - because of collision problem, will
operation goes together. require change to inelTicient separate east and west
phasing. Longer delays.
T;vergreen -convert to efficient phasing with Evergreen - no change, keeps east + west traffic
east + west together. Shorter delays. separate. I
Inforniational Mccno April 25, 2006
Rroad%kray Avenuc Rcswfacing Project Page 3
Roadway Sections
Relaw are 'befcxe' anJ 'after' pictures of a stmci that «•as convrRed from 4 lanes to 3 lencs.
- - s
. il •y 1
„,w ~ _ • ,.~i,~' j ~~z:~ -
- ' - -
: ~ _ - - ~ ~ f :
As mentioned Larlier the [3rvadway resurfaeing pcaject limits an; from 13ates Road tfl Sullivan
Kond. If rccontiguration from 4-lanes to 3-lanes is considered, we would propose tu da this
bctween the major crossraads uf Pines Road and Sullivan Road. See map below. The currcnt
lane configuration at tho intersection of Qroadway Avenue gnd Pines Road would rrmsin
since this intetseciian is conertc and is not included in the overiay project.
r r ~
: f
1
A~■
Y
OveM7 Lbob1
MrW 11~ LIIIIIh -s--~
I'here are severnl issues thai would need to be considered if a decision is made Uo restripc a 3-
lane srction with thc Bruadway overlay projcct. 5ome of these issues include:
• The dcvelopment af rcvised striping plans and a change ardcr to the cantractor beforc
thc current ovcrlay praject begins in June
• Investigation of the necd tu change the signal phasing at Evergreen Road frum F.-W
trafiic moving together to E?rW traETc moving separately. Spokanc County revised
the signal phasing yrars ago to reduce cotlisions and accommodate higher traffic to
the mall. The current phasing reduces the efficiency of the intersextion causing
longer delays.
• Discuss crosswalk locadons and potential medians (pedestrian rcfuge islands) with
the schools within the project area
• Pu61ic NotificationlOpE;n 1 fouse?
• Potential 2-3 month drlay of avcrlny wurk if a puhlic mccting is dcsired.
Informational N-1enio April 2.5, 2006
[3roadti%ay Avenuc Resurfacing Nrojcct Yagc 4
f3eluw is nn cxamplc of a collision reporc fi•orii I3road%Nuy/McL3ona1J.
~
A ~4
U-! 1 i ! _l~_'.jl~ ~i. ! ! _1
~Vietr o
p ..._0
~ ~.111 i! :--.LL.LJ_l-J-J_.1_L;. _Ll_LL: _ I L1
!-C1a I i ! l7
..I - Cl ur• I ~ M ~ ~ i•~I.:w
0146AW
;,T;
s, 1• ~
r,-T-
. i~.:-~~. = • , ~ , - ; - -
H+
_ ~~c-iL • G~ ' `+~.~il/ /._oLf~~.li .
_ 'A+~r~r,~ ~.J ~~s1 J ~ vs✓~~ I
k /
(
l~ f?l~1i
i _ . ~3.
L .~•,M•~ ~~7% ~
A P,wT s ♦ "°''L,Z.°F~~
V4'e would be liappy to aiiswrr any yuestions Cuiuicil may havc: reluted to this issue.
J
S `t"~ok~ane
,;,ooOValley 11707 E Spraque Ave Suite 106 • Spolcane Valley WA 99206
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ dtyhaU@spokanevatlty.org
Memorandum
To: Dave Mercier, City Manager and Members of Council
From: Morgan Koudelka. AdministrativB Analyst
Date: May 2, 2006
Re: Modfication oi Hearing Examiner Agreement
The City contracts with Spokane County for the services of a heanng examiner to hear land use,
administrative and other malters over which the City has jurisdiction The County has adjusted the
hearing examiner rate to include non-produdive hours. Simply put, the county is factoring in
vacation, sick, breaks, training, and other non-bil(able time so that we will pay for a share of all
heanng examiner cosfs. This is similar to settle and adjust agreements in which our usage rate is
applied to all costs for a service, including the costs spent for employee's non-productive time.
The Caunty is taking the total Hearing Examiner costs and dividing by the total number of billable
hours so that all costs can be recovered.
The expected difference between the old cost methodology and the new cost methodoiogy is
shown in the table belaw.
DilTcrcace bctweca Prafuctive Hours Cnlculation (New Mrtbndolagyy) and M uU Hours Calculatioa (Uld
McthudoloQ,)
Raba
Noejrs SaiarX__ Indirad M 8 O Total 2005 Hours Est 2006 Cast 2006 Budg~et
PrncluctivaHours 1,527.50 S 10957 S 8.58 $ 3,94 $ 12208 S 453.00 i 55,308.77 S 65,453.00
Ful Hours 1,950.00 $ 85 82 $ 6.90 $ 3.08 S 95.70 S 453.OD S 43,35210 $ 65.453.00
The County used estimates to arrive at the produdive hours number of 1,527.50 and will use this
same calculation for all generel fund departments that use an hourly rate (Hearing Examiner and
Prosecutor). The Courrty's calculation shows 18.3396 of total hours as produdive hours
The producctive hours calculation is shown in the attached Exhibit 2 for the 2006 cocttract year.
As this is a major modification to the cost methodology, the City Manager can only modify the
heanng examiner agreement witfi Council appraval.
A motion consideration will be brought forward to Council at the May 9 Council meeting for the
purpose af amending the hearing examiner agreement. If the Council approves the amendment,
the attached Exhibit 2 will be attached to the Hearing Examiner contract 06-14, approved March
14, 2006. There is no change necessary to the language in the body of the contract.
Attachment: 2006 Cost Methodology Exhibit 2 for Heanng Examiner Services
,
t.iliit'it : I
tipw4nuc 1-uua1y
tipnlner %'*Ury Ilryring Fxaminer tTvorFy Ratc
:AU6 1`anvarl
2004 :\doplcd Utrrct I.ahnr ludkrcct Prr N11U Per
PnWio• Nin Hudget (_:o.tt pcr flunr llour Eluur Cnit 1'cr Hoar
Fn
i(r.arittgPxmminc I I06.136.00 69.41 3.44 344 79
5tn(f Assi:rsent I 1 61,729 W 4008 3.14 43
_ 1n7,;f, 4 (xi tf%) i7 5 58 1 114 I ~..._.n
h!-iti f+,i'c b.i.al ~~n :n.i r~':t , . 1 ti ' . .-.n :n~-,:,c:! t _:Lcv ..n~t ~~•-ivt~ts ' 83'.,
~iuutrayncr & I)peraunn
1006 AdoptcA %1 .i t ~ t
La.a: Cate..l.e..,a !/rt lt~id le ~r VaOe~ -
4 I70 lqai - UK Spnkne VWGey IApl Servica fQ Vdley Cam (SAO)
5 110 taww"niem" • Spatsu Yallery wI1 lim ~prte comad kr caoflza me (1,000)
')i IO lnlntisu: F4m . Iwii7 m,t fFais m YLlletimatra7 (a0!))
!sj Capowitn teduene"
3111 offms s~~ ndl.m c.pKaa cm tor :006 (400)
, t 70 uthr rrdeninnat - tsm nmourh w►y opocoed mm (400)
Puq , r:u-r4 - I r:,al,:: ~,e rrr M dwa (1.230)
aSj ui(rd 1*1.41> t014
Auowi Huun
A-mlahk Arun:ll 1 Scur,
Irsq 11 Paid Ilulxfays 82_54U i 1! iLy: a? ti luwn-.::lav i
irs5 10 Vacutran CLys 7500 (10 dyys x 1.5 twur-Jday )
Lea 1 S;clc Days 30 00 (4 day3 x 7S hau3Jdsr)
L,m' 1Nue 3Q irtmirttaAdfy(m1S. tnrtn 11750 ( 235 xvgdaysNcer x 30 s,nricr. i.iy :i:l ',I. .1 h, •:nu.ur.L~~:.~ i
L_ess i'wo 15 mmuts 6rra{c3/day I! 7 G0 (?1 5 1 cg d3y.'yry x it) m(m.tc•.'.].ay iua: hy r..U [nmutc .0-11
j
;lanaal Hoan Wor4rd 1.527.50
Sfal.anc County Md7ctmum ArutunJ N-u(k Ilottr-, - 7 5 hntux:&a}' x CS~1'SNLYI. x
Srxiknnc i'cunry• hlaximum hrsmm! f)aps i d!Jry'wcci c~) ~•.r~i::'~~-u ~~s:-:+:r.;u
.';jwii-.nr l'rr.m:N '1;+r;u•r A:~;url !r 1 1 P.iij hu:!d14%- ~:u,a'inn Ihr-, -4 -.ic1 diu-;