2006, 05-16 Study Session74i/te
AGENDA
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHEET
STUDY SESSION
Tuesday, May 16, 2006 6:00 p.m.
CITY tLA LL COUNCH. CHAMBERS
11707 East Sprague Avenue, First Floor
(Please Turn Off All Electronic Devices During the Meeting)
DISCUSSION LEADER SUH.IEC'I .711 ivy GOAL,
Employee Introduction: Jennifer Cusick Recreation Coordinator - by Mike Jackson, Parks & Rec Director
1. Bruce Hamner, Fire District #1 Community Emergency Response Team
5 minutes) Program (CERT)
2. Neil Kcrsten (15 minutes)
3. Tom Scholtens (20 minutes)
d. Ken Thompson (20 minutes)
5. Cary Driskell/Mike: Connelly
(15 minutes)
Converting BroadNray to That Lanes
Ad I1oe Right-of--Way Committee
Proposed 2006 Budget Amendment
Appeal Fees
6. Councilmembm (15 minutes) Council Budget Items
7. Mayor Wilhite
8. Mayor Wilhite
9. Dave Mcmicr
Advance Agenda Additions
Council Check in
City Manager Comments
Discussion/1 n format ion
Discussion/information
D i scussion tI n formation
Discussion/Information
Discussiuti/Information
Discussion/Information
Discussion/Information
DiscussionAnformntion
DiscussionInfnrmation
Now Unless otherwise noted above, there will be no public comments at Council Study Sessions. Howenw, Council always reserves
the right to request Information from the public and staff as appropriate
WNICE: Individuals planning to attend the martw-A who rtquirt spexiri asustanee w socommodste physical, hearing, or other Impairments, please contact
( the City Clerk a I St1e1► 921- I OW as taxes as possible so that wMe anenes mss be maic
Study Session Ar-nda, (15-16.46
Pads I or 1
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 05-16-06 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Community Emergency Response Team Program (CERT)
Bruce Hamner, Fire District #1, will give a presentation on the CERT Program
(Community Emergency Response Team).
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT:
ATTACHMENTS
0
Spokane Valley Fire Department
Community Emergency Response Teams (CERT)
Following a major disaster, first responders who provide fire and medical services will
not be able to meet the demand for these services. Factors as number of victims,
communication failures, and road blockages will prevent people from accessing
emergency, services they have come to expect at a moment's notice through 911. People
will have to rely on each other for help in order to meet their immediate life saving and
life sustaining needs.
The Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) Program educates people about
disaster preparedness for hazards that may impact their area and trains them in basic
disaster response skills; such as fire safety, light search and rescue, team organization,
and disaster medical operations. This training is designed to prepare you to help yourself,
your family, and your neighbors in the event of a major disaster. Using the training
learned in the classroom and during exercises, CERT members can assist others in their
neighborhood or workplace following an event when professional responders are not
immediately available to help. CERT members also are encouraged to support emergency
response agencies by taking a more active role in emergency preparedness projects i.6
their community.
The Spokane Valley Fire Department's CERT program is comprised of 2 basic areas:
C 1) Initial class- this is a 7 week course, one night a week for approximately 34 hours.
Through the 7 weeks, being prepared is taught through subjects as: Disaster
Preparedness, Fire Suppression, Medical Operation.% Light Search and Rescue,
Command and Control.
2) Continuing Education Training - this part of our program is comprised of 6 refresher
classes throughout the year. They are held in March, April, May and September,
October, November, one night a month for 2 howl. During the end of May, a V2 day
scenario based drill is conducted.
We are looking for citizens to volunteer their time to be better prepared and to help their
community when it is needed. For more information or to sign up for an upcoming
CERT class, please contact the Spokane Valley Fire Department administration at
509-928-1700.
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 16, 2006 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ® old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Converting Broadway to Three Lanes
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: NIA
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: 1) Approval of Six Year Transportation Improvement
Plan, which includes the Broadway Avenue Overlay Project, 2) approval of application for
federal grant funding for the Broadway Avenue Overlay Project, 3) Review of Informational
Memo included in the May 2, 2006 Council packets.
BACKGROUND: Public Works received a $703,000 federal grant for the rehabilitation of
Broadway Avenue between Bates Road and Sullivan Road. This project will improve 2.46 miles
of roadway surface by grinding and overlaying the road with 2 inches of asphalt concrete
pavement.
During the course of this project the issue of possibly re-striping Broadway Avenue from 4 lanes
to 3 lanes has been brought up as a potential way to mitigate the number of collisions at
intersections and to provide additional/safer bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
An informational memo was prepared comparing the differences between 4-lane and 3-lane
roadways. (See attached)
OPTIONS: Discussion
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: NIA
STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten, Public Works Director
Inga Note, Traffic Engineer
Steve Worley, Senior Engineer - Capital Projects
ATTACHMENTS Informational Memo dated 4/25106
0
jalley
11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhalt@spokanevatley.org
Informational Memo
To:
Dave Mercier, City Council
From:
Neil Kersten, Inga Note, Steve Worley
CC:
Date:
4125106
Re:
Broadway Avenue Resurfacing Project
Introduction
The resurfacing of Broadway Avenue from Bates Road to Sullivan Road is scheduled to
begin in June this year. This federally funded project consists of grinding 2" off the existing
road surface and replacing it with new asphalt and then restriping the roadway back to its
current 4-lane configuration.
In response to a request from Council the Public Works Department wanted to provide an
O overview of the traffic and safety issues associated with the current 4-lane striping of
Broadway Avenue. We also wanted to discuss the potential of restriping Broadway Avenue
to a 3-lane section to reduce the number of collisions and provide more pedestrian safety
along this principal arterial.
Background
Over the last several years there have been a significant number of accidents at intersections
along Broadway, due mainly to the current 4-lane configuration and the lack of visibility for
eastbound and westbound left-turning traffic. Typically the rate of "accidents per million
entering vehicles," or Acc/MEV, is used to compare the total number of accidents to the
traffic volumes at any particular location. An Acc/MEV rate greater than 1.0 indicates a
problem that should be addressed.
One way to address this issue is to reconfigure Broadway Avenue to a 3-lane section. This
allows left-turning traffic to get out of the through lane while waiting for an opening in on-
coming traffic, thus reducing the potential for rear-end collisions. It also provides improved
visibility of on-coming traffic for left-turns at intersections. This significantly reduces the
collision potential at cross streets.
The following table highlights some of the differences between a 4-lane street and a 3-lane
street
Informational Memo
April 25, 2006
Broadway Avenue Resurfacing Project Page 2
Issue
3-Lane
4 ,ane
Capacity
Before and after studies of conversions from 4 to 3 lanes in Seattle show either configuration can
carry 18,000 ADT or more.
Local
11,500 ADT: Grand-32" to 38
Capacity
12,900 A.DT: 29"' - High Dr. to Grand
11,000 A.DT Broadway - Park to Sullivan
Examples
•
15,800 ADT: Alberta- Driscoll to Francis
18,300 ADT Wall - Monroe to Cascade Way
24,738 ADT: Cntry Hms Blvd, w of Wall
Vehicle
Seattle study of 16 conversions resulted in a
Rate > 1.0 acc/MEV indicates a problem.
Safety
27% reduction in collisions.
Broadway/Argonne - 1.0 acc./MEV
Corrects through-left collision pattern at
Broadway/Mulla.n - L I ace.IMEV
McDonald.
Broadway/University - 1.9acc./MFV
Broadway/McDonald - 1.3 acc./MEV
Broadway/Evergreen - 0.8 acc./MEV
compare to Sprague/Univ - 1.7 ace./ME
i1
Provides TWLTL for turns to side streets and
i
driveway.
Longer wait to exit driveways but residents
can back into TWLTL
Many sideswipe and rear-end collisions caused by
turning vehicles.
Residents back out into through lanes.
Bike
Room for 5' bike lanes. Broadway identified
No bike lanes without widening and purchasing
in the Comprehensive Plan as bike/ped. route
additional R/W
Pedestrian
Bike lane provides buffer between sidewalk
Existing 4' sidewalk is narrow, many power pole
and traffic lanes.
obstructions, and adjacent to traffic lane.
Speeds
Single through lane regulates speed in
Two through lanes allows high-speed vehicles to
residential neighborhood.
pass.
Schools
Kids cross 2 through lanes.
Kids cross 4 through lanes.
(Summit,
Allows center median islands for safer
No room for median islands at crosswalks.
Progress)
crosswalks.
Parents block through lane while turning into d.rop-
TWLTL provides queuing area for parents
off driveway.
turning into drop-off driveway.
Mail &
Bike Lane provides partial shoulder for mail
Mail trucks and buses stop in travel lane, greater
Transit
deliveries and transit stops.
potential for sideswipes, rear-ends.
Emergency
Can travel in TWLTL.
Must wait for vehicles to move into curb lane.
Vehicles
Signal
McDonald - no change, east + west traffic
McDonald - because of collision problem, will
operation
goes together.
require change to inefficient separate east and west
phasing. Longer delays. i`
Evergreen convert to efficient phasing with
Evergreen - no change, keeps east + west traffic
east + west together. Shorter delays.
separate.
J
1
Informational Memo
Broadway Avenue Resurfacing Project
April 25, 2006
Page 3
Roadway Sections
Below are 'before' and 'after' pictures of a strcet that was converted from 4 lanes to 3 lanes.
As mentioned earlier the Broadway resurfacing project limits are from Bates Road to Sullivan
Road. If reconfiguration from 4-lanes to 3-lanes is considered, we would propose to do this
between the major crossroads of Pines Road and Sullivan Road. See map below. The current
lane configuration at the intersection of Broadway Avenue and Pines Road would remain
since this intersection is concrete and is not included in the overlay project.
There are several issues that would need to be rAmsidcred if a decision is made to restripe a 3-
lane section with the Broadway overlay project. Some of these issues include:
• The development of revised striping plans and a change order to the contractor before
the current overlay project begins in June
• Investigation of the need to change the signal phasing at Evergreen Road from E-W
traffic moving together to E -W traffic moving separately. Spokane County revised
the signal phasing years ago to reduce collisions and accommodate higher traffic to
the mall. The current phasing reduces the efficiency of the intersection causing
longer delays.
• Discuss crosswalk locations and potential medians (pedestrian refuge islands) with
the schools within the project area
• Public Notification/Open House"
• Potential 2-3 month delay of overlay work if a public meeting is desired.
11' - 11' - W- 11'
5'-1P-12'-11'-5'
Informational Memo April 25, 2006
Broadway Avenue Resurfacing Project Page a
Below is an examplc of a collision report from Broadway/McDonald.
rz==r W-
A
.moo ..rk--
mr.r.s,. Rcroar rd L T
o1~a•f yr i'- i !7i~~_ tl~~'t~~
We would be happy to answer any questions Council may have related to this issue.
lllllll(lllllllilllll !.LIL1
A Rwi a A w. LIZI-{LA-
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 16 May 2006 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ® pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Report: Ad Hoc Right-of-Way Committee
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 10.05 Article II Construction Work and Activity Within
Right-0f--Way
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: 4-11-06 City Council Direction
BACKGROUND: At the 4-11-06 City Council meeting staff was directed to develop an Ad Hoc
Committee to look at the non cut Street Obstruction Permit requirements. Following is the
proposal for that committee:
Purpose of the committee:
To evaluate SVMC 10.05 Article II Construction Work and Activity Within Right-of-Way to
establish if the Section is required to be clarified or changed as it relates to non-street cut
activity.
Issues:
1. Is all work in the ROW permitted the same or are non-cut permits able to get longer or
multi location permits?
2. Can franchise holders be exempted from certain permits?
3. How much of the ROW must be used to cause the City to require an Obstruction Permit?
4. How long can a traffic lane be obstructed prior to an Obstruction Permit Being required?
Committee Members:
City of Spokane Valley
Public Works representative
Legal Department representative
Building Official
Admin Assistant
Spokane Valley Fire Department
Quest
Avista
Modern Electric Water Company
Vera Irrigation District #15
Consolidated Irrigation #19
Arborist/Landscaper
Small excavation contractor
OPTIONS:
1. Direct staff to proceed with forming the committee with a consensus report to be
forthcoming on issues 1-4.
2. Reorder Issues, redefine Purpose or provide additional direction.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Council directs staff to proceed with the ad hoc
committee as proposed.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Limited time commitment for City resources.
STAFF CONTACT: Building Official Scholtens
ATTACHMENTS
none
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 16, 2006
City Manager Sign-off.
Item: Check all that ap ly: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business
❑ public hearing information ❑ admin. report Opending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed Amendments to the 2006 Budget.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: State law requires a public hearing and an amendment to our
budget when the City will exceed appropriations.
Previous Council Action Taken: The City budget for 2006 was adopted in November 2005.
BACKGROUND:
Budget adjustments are needed to: 1) transfer $2,105,000 to the Service Level Reserve Fund to
maintain operating service levels during reduced economic activity; 2) adjust revenue sources to
anticipated levels; 3) update the budget for programs and projects carried over from prior years;
4) increase appropriations for contracted services; 5) authorize additional appropriations related
to the bond proceeds and a school zone light grant; 6) authorize temporary assistance for
Community Development; A more detailed listing of the proposed budget amendments is
attached as Exhibit A.
OPTIONS: Options include amending the budget, amending the budget for some of the
changes or making no amendments. The budget should be amended to comply with
Washington State law.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Direction to staff to proceed with these budget
amendments is recommended.
BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS: Passage of an amended budget ordinance will provide the
authorization to move ahead with these programs.
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Thompson, Finance Director
Jason Faulkner, Accountant/Budget Analyst
AMENDMENTS TO 2006 BUDGET
MAY 16, 2006
KEN THOMPSON
JASON FAULKNER
AMENDMENTS TO 2006 BUDGET, Continued
REQUIRED BY STATE LAW:
• Programs carried over
• Temp help for Community Dev.
• Housekeeping adjustments
• Trans. to Service Level Stabilization
AMENDMENTS TO 2006 BUDGET, Continued
MAY 16, 2006
GENERAL FUND:
• Mobile data terminals
$200,000
• Communications grant match
$100,000
• Community Dev. temp help
$100,000
• Employee training
$ 20,000
• Trans to Service Level Stabil.
$23105,000
AMENDMENTS TO 2006 BUDGET, Continued
MAY 16, 2006
Street Bond Proceeds:
Street Projects $300,000
Street Fund
School zone light grant $ 35,600
Barker Bridge:
Bridge Improvements $332,400
Total $3,193,000
2
City of Spokane Valley
Exhibit A
Amendments to 2006 Budget
May 2006
REVENUE
EXPENDITURE
Fund
INCREASE
INCREASE
Explanation
GENERAL
Unrestricted reserves
$ 940,000
Transfer to Serv. Level Reserve
$ 2,105,000
Achieve reserve target level
Sales tax
1,400,000
-
Iricreass to current estimate
Gambling tax
100,000
-
Increase to current est~nate
Fines/Forfeitures
(100,000)
-
Decrease to current estona
Service fees
85,000
-
Increase to current estimate
Investment earnings
100,000
-
Investment income is increasing
Mobile data terminals for police
-
200,000
Coundl authorized in late 05
Communications grant match
-
100,000
council authorized In Is% 05
Com. Dev. Temp. Help
-
100,000
Council discussion 4-15-06
Employee training
-
20,000
Planned In 05 but happened in 05
General Fund Totals
$ 2,525,000
$ 2,525,000
Street Fund
School zone light grant $ 35,600 $ 35,600 Grant for Msting rights
BOND SALE PROCEEDS
Unrestricted reserves 300,000
Street projects 3W,000 To use up bond proceeds
BARKER BRIDGE
Federal Grant $ 332,400
Bridge Improv. $ 332,400 To Increase to 2005 estimate
GRAND TOTALS---> $ 3,193,000 $ 3,193,000
Other significant changes which did not require a budget amendment:
-Pines/Mansfield project has been delayed ($3 million reduction)
-Bridging the Valley project did not receive state funding ($2 million
reduction).
:Budgetamend)oc5-1-06 attach A
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 16, 2006 City Manager Sign-off-
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information X admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Appeal fees
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Master Fee Schedule, SVMC 10.30.150, et seq.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None
BACKGROUND: The Council adopted penalty provisions to handle code violations and
nuisance violations, pursuant to SVMC 10.30. Those provisions state that people alleged to
have violated our code provisions can appeal that administrative determination. Such an appeal
would go to our Hearing Examiner.
Our Master Fee Schedule identifies that appeals of administrative determinations have a $1,000
appeal fee. There is some ambiguity as to whether the type of administrative determination
contemplated by the existing fee is the type identified contemplated by the $1,000 fee that
already exists. The $1,000 fee appears to be intended for appeals of land use development
determinations.
Staff recommends establishing a new fee that is specifically intended for appeals of nuisance
type administrative determinations. Staff further recommends setting the appeal fee at $500 for
this type of appeal.
OPTIONS: Place on agenda for action by the Council
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consensus to put on regular agenda for
consideration for adoption by resolution.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Should be relatively close to revenue neutral because the
cost of appeal should cover the cost of the Hearing Examiner.
STAFF CONTACT: Cary P. Driskell, Deputy City Attorney; Mike Connelly, City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS:
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 05-16-06 City Manager Sign-off-
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Council Budget items
Councilmembers will discuss budget issues, including the topic of contract lobbyists.
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT:
ATTACHMENTS
DRAFT
ADVANCE AGENDA
For Planning Discussion Purposes Only
as of May 11, 2006 8:30 a.m.
Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative
To: Council 8t Staff
From: City Manager
Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings
May 23, 2006, Regular Meeting, 6:00 a.m. [due date Thurs, May 111
1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2007-2012 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) [15 minutes]
2. PUBLIC BEARING: 2006 Amended Budget [ 15 minutes]
3. Consent Agenda: Minutes, Claims, Payroll [5 minutes]
4. First Reading, Proposed Ordinance Amending 2006 Budget- Ken Thompson [10 minutes]
5. Proposed Resolution Setting Logo Standards - Cary Driskell [10 minutes]
6. Motion Consideration: Precinct Building Purchase - Nina Regor [10 minutes]
7. Information Only: (a) Department Monthly Reports; (b) Time-Warner Franchise
[estimated meeting: 65 minutes*]
May 30, 2006 - Day After Memorial day Holiday - NO MEETING
June 6, 2006, Study Session, 6:00 p.m.
1. SRTC Traffic Impact Study - Neil Kersten
2. Bigelow Gulch - Neil Kersten (tentative)
3. W SDOT - Round-abouts (tentative)
4. Traffic, Traffic Lights, and Speed Limits Discussion - Neil Kersten
5. Geiger Agreement Discussion - Cary Driskell
6. Time Warner Franchise - Cary Driskell
7. CH2M Hill Valley Corridor EA Amendment - Neil Kersten
[due date Thurs, May 251
(25 minutes)
(15 minutes)
(15 minutes)
(20 minutes)
(15 minutes)
(15 minutes)
(15 minutes)
8. Information Only: County Memorandum of Understanding Sewer Amendment
.7CUUC3U2&V, aUUV It 4VVV, 1V:VV A.M. - ib:VV LI.111. %IV1
(lunch on your own) County Courthouse (room TBA) -
TOTAL MINUTES: 75 minutes
June 13, 2006, Regular Meeting, 6:00 Pan [due date Thurs, June I]
1. PUBLIC HEARING: Cable Franchise - Morgan Koudelka [45 minutes]
2. Consent Agenda: Minutes, Claims, Payroll [5 minutes]
3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance Amending 2006 Budget - Ken Thompson [10 minutes]
4. First Reading Proposed Ordinance Amending Property Maintenance Code - Cary Driskell [10 minutes]
5. First Reading, Proposed Ordinance Amending SVMC Title 10, Construction Work and Activity
Within Right-of-way (SVMC Title 10.05.070-10.05.250)- Tom Scholtens/CaryDriskell [15 minutes]
6. First Reading Proposed Ordinance for Street Vacation STV 01-06 - Karen Kendall [5 minutes]
7. Proposed Resolution Adopting 2007-2012 TIP - Steve Worley [10 minutes]
8. Motion Consideration: Geiger Agreement - Cary Driskell [15 minutes]
9. Motion Consideration: CH2M Hill Valley Corridor EA Amendment - Neil Kersten [10 minutes]
10. Motion Consideration: County Sewer Memorandum of Understanding Agreement
Amendment - Neil Kersten
11. Administrative Reports: Cable Franchise Update - Morgan Koudelka
Draft Advance Agenda 5/11/2006 8:25 AM
[15 minutes]
[10 minutes]
[estimated meeting: 150 minutes*]
Page l of 2
Wed, June 14, 2006..6 p.m. Conversation vv/Community, Greenacres Christian Church, 18018 E. Mission Ave.
L74My ,ruuc J &VVV, 7.VV a.Mo - J.VV MA LTMU' 1 GAi_ I.VYOG1JV0t=1L JMClrulil
(Councilmember Denenny's Cabin) [due Thum, May 251
Tentative agenda items include:
1. Council Goals for 2007 4. Updated Financial Forecast
2. Council Goals for 2006 (sub-urea planning?) 5. Joint Planning
3. Business Planning Template Info Only: Workplan Update
Annexation Approaches
Jane 199 2006:
Topic of discussion: joint planning (specifics on downtown meeting place TBA)
(A WC Annual Conference, June 20-23, 2006)
June 20, 2006, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. (possibility ofcancellation due to AWC Meeting) [due date Thurs, June 81
June 27, 2006, Regular Meeting, 6:00 p.m. [due date Thurs, June 151
1. Consent Agenda: Minutes, Claims, Payroll [5 minutes]
2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance Amending Property Maintenance Code - Cary Driskell [10 minutes]
3. Second Reading, Proposed Ordinance Amending SVMC Title 10, Construction Work and Activity
Within Right-of-way (SVMC Title 10.05.070-10.05.250 -Tom Scholtens/Cary Driskell [15 minutes]
4. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance for Street Vacation STV 01-06 - Karen Kendall [5 minutes]
5. Motion Consideration: Cost of Living Adjustment for Non-represented Employees - Dave Mercier [5 min]
6. Information Only: Department Monthly Reports [estimated meeting: 40 minutes*1
July 4 - NO MEETING
July 11, 2006, Regular Meeting, 6:00 p.m.
July 18, 2006, Study Session, 6:00 p.m.
July 25, 2006, Regular Meetine, 6:00 p.m.
August 8, 2006, Regular Meeting, 6:00 p.m.
[due date Thurs, June 291
Idue date Thurs, July 61
/due date Thurs, July 131
[due date Thurs July 271
OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS:
Pandemic Response Strategies - Fire District #I Chief Mike Thompson
Prism/Plus/Padal (Parcel Data Locator) System - Chris Berg
Central Valley School District Impact Fee Request
Proposed Sidewalk Ordinance
Sewer Collection Systems - Neil Kersten
SEPA Mitigation Strategies - Cary Driskell/Greg McCormick/Neil Kersten
Planned Unit Development (PUD) Policy Issues - Marina Sukup/Mike Connelly
Dale Stedman, Jerry Lenzi - to report on the North/South Freeway
estimated meeting time does not include time for public comments]
Draft Advance Agenda 5/1112006 8:25 AM
Page 2 of 2