The URL can be used to link to this page

2005, 12-20 Study Session •1•~~I ' / r l'• :t ~ J- _ . f - Ac,F:NuA C'ITY" Ok' SPOKANF VAI_I_Eti` CITY COLrNCT[. WoRxsHLLT STUDY 5ES410N Tucsday, Dccrmbcr 20. 200; 6:00 p.m. SPOEi.ANE VALI..EY Cf1'Y H4LL 11707 Eust Spragac Avenue, Suite 101 (Plt-we Tnrn Off All F.lcctroaic Dcvires 1)uring the Meeting) t)LSCL'tiS[()N LFAnFR S(173,IECTIA(:7'1VM' GQAL F.mpluyee brtrochicllun: Judi A1ain, Peraat Spec:iulrsl, ht• Tcim Sdwlten.s, Building Qfficiu! 1. Uhric R;iinhriiige (10 minutcs) Administration rt c)ath af C)ffire f~ir Presentatian CQUncitmcmbcrs 2. UavL Mrrcier/I'oby Stcwnrt 2009 World Figure Sl:ttting Champic,nsiip5 PrcSCntatinn/forrriation (15 minutcs) Cal WaIk-er i 10 minutes) hast VaIle,, 5chtx)1 T)istrici SchovE Resourcc Pre,eotatio(i;'InformtUiL)u C)ff iccrs 1. Davc Cco;by 120 minutes) Ac! Hoc; Si,gn Committee Upiate Diwu.xsionr[nforniation -5. 1'om Scholtcns (10 minutes) Pevement Cut PoticS• Discusssan/lnformntion 6_ Mnrina Sukup/Grcg McCaimick Drati Roqucst fo: Praposals fur thc Spra:;urr I7iscussWn.~7nformation (IS mintues) Appk-way Carridcrc Submva Plan 7. Neil Ker.Strn (20 minutcs) Chaft Scape af Work far Stneet titaster}ilan I)ix:ussioiL+lnfurmatian and Rctntcd Activi1ie5 8. Ncil KCmcn.'Jahn Hvhtnan Raad h'inintcnincc lipdutc I)iscus4ion;'Inf'ormation (?0 minutes) Llave Morcicr (15 minutcs) Scrvice Rccognitian Dixcussiott/Infurmntian 10. Mnyur Wilhite (S minutcs) Advance Agcndst Additinns DiscussioNinformation 11. Mxyor Wilhitc Council Check in Discussion/Infortnntian I?. nfive Men:ier City Mtutagzr Commcnts Discussion/In!'emuitism 1Vcrte: Unltss uthcttvisc uutcd abovc, thcrE will bc no puhlic wmmencs Mt Couneil Study S-cs~mn,. }Iv%rvcs, t'ounril ah~a-- , tcsr,rvcs thc tight to roqucst intormatlen from thc public ansi staff as apprupxinte. N(7i1(F• lnc4ividnels pl2nning to attentl tfit meeting wtsfl crquire.Tecinl assistarrre to uecnaunt,dltr ph}•sical, hcarinq, or othirr fmruirncnt•,, r pleav: cvutn:t 11:c f Ity 1'Icri rt i5t►Q) 1121-1000 fC intiil 2- possihl: ;a thn! r.:r--ngemcnE•: mv: h: m-idc 5tud+ 5a.iiz1 ,L4cnJz, I`.?rJ ;It i'a.: 1 of i CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 12-20-05 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Administration of Oath of Office for Councilmembers GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Couticilinembers may be sworn in at the 13st council meeting in December or up to ten'-days before the scheduled day Qf assuming ofkicc, Januztry 1. (RCGV 29.04.170(3).) Whp may aclminister thc oath of office? RCW 29.01.135(4) provicfes fhaC an oath or affirmation "shall Ue administcred ancl ccrlifecl by a.ny officer or notary public who administers oaths, witliout eMarge therefore," t\ notary public is clearly authorized to administer osths as arc judicial offic:ers and city clerks. ; - PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: . OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: l~ STAFF CONTACT: Chris Bainbridge ; ATTAC H M ENTS 2009 World Figure Skating Championships ~ 9 ~ March 2009 2009 J Fact Sheet WORLD FIGURE SKATING CHAMPIONSHIPS SPOKANE, WASHINGTON CANDIDATE ClTY OVERVIEW The World Figure Skafiing Championships is the most prestigious competition outside of the Winter Olympics for the Olympic sporf of Figure Skafing, attracting more than 200 afhlefes from over 40 nations. The objective now is to gamer the necessary support required to submit a successful bid to hosf the 2009 World Figure Skafiing Championships. If the state of Washington is selected, the competifion would take place in March of 2009 at the Spokane Arena and the Spokane Convenfiion Center. Unlike the U.S. Figure Skating Championships which include Novice, Junior and Chompionship (Olympic) level athletes, the World Championships include only the elite level athletes. THE BID PROCESS Cities compete to hosf the Worid Figure Skafing Championships in much the same way that cities compete to hosfi the Olympic Games. The Intemational Skafiing Union, the International governing body for the Olympic sport of Figure Skafiing selects the city that will hosf each yeQr's World Championships. Each country that chooses to bid on the World Championships selects ihe site that is submitfied to the I.S.U. as their candidate city. As a result of the record attendance achieved at Smart Ones Skate America held in Spokane in October 2002, and the record ticket sales fhus far for the 2007 State Farm U.S. Figure Skating Championships, Spokane is a viable candidate to host the Worid Championships. 'I'he next few months will be crucial to Spokane submifting a successful bid, as local organiaers work wifh the entire community to create the best bid. 7he Intemational Skafing Union's deadline for countries to submit their bid for the 2009 Worlds is April 15, 2006, the I.S.U. will make its selection for 2009 in 2006. At the I.S.U. Council Meeting helci in Genevo, Switzerland eartier this month, (Ociober 14-16, 2005) the International Skating Union announced its selection of Gvthenburg, Sweden for the 2008 World Figure Skating Championships which will be held March 17 - 23, 2008. ECONOMIC IMPACT The World Championships were last held in the Paciflc Norlhwest in 2001 in Vancouver, British Columbia. Figures announced by Vancouver Tourism indicate that the overall economic impact of the 2001 World Figure Skating Championships to Brftish Columbia was $81.6 million with $63.7 million in the Greater Vancouver areo. 2001 was the last World Championships held prior to the 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake Ciry. The 2009 World Championships will be the last Worid Championships held prior to the 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver, British Columbia. UPCOMING HOST CITIES The next fihree host cities are 2006 - Calgary, Canada; 2007 - Tokyo, Japdn; and 2008 - Gothenburg, Sweden. PAST US HOST CITIES The World Championships were last hosted in the United Stafies in Washington DC, in 2003; in 'Minneapolis, MN, in 1998; and in Oakland, CA in 1992. 2009 World Figure Skating Championships Marc h 2009 Fact Sheet PAST INTERNATIONAL HOST CITIES The past five internafiional hos4 cities were; 2005 - Moscow, Russia; 2004 - Dortmund, Germany; 2002 - Nagano. Japan; 2001- Vancouver, Canada: 2000 - Nice, France. OFFICIAL VENUES The Spokane Arena - If the State of Washington is selected to host the 2009 World Fgure Skating Championships, the competition venue will be the Spokane Arenp in downtown Spokane, a 10.500 seat venue. In addition to hosting all competitions, the venue wifl also host practice sessions daily. Spokane Convention Center - The secondary venue for the 2009 World Figure Skating Championships will be the Spokane Convention Center, which will have had previous exAeriencE hosting a figure skating competition when the 2007 State Farm U.S. Figure Skating Championships are held in Spokane, January 21-28, 2007. TELEVISION COVERAGE The 2009 World Figure Skating Championships will.include a total of 17 hours of national coverage produced by ABC Sporfs on ESPN and ESPN2. In addition to the broadcasts on ESPN and ESPN2, the 2009 World Championships will be broadcast in numerous other nations including Canada (CTV), Japan (TBS), China (CCTV), Europe (EBU), Korea (SSS), and ESPN International. Figure Skating Continues to Rate High Among Television Yiewers Figure skating is consistently rafed as the highest rated Olympic Winter Sport on television. In 2002, the ladies figure skating final at the 2002 Olympic Winter Games attracted the largest television audience of the event garnering a 29.0 rating and 42 share. MEDIA COVERAGE The 2009 World Figure Skating Championships will attract over 400 local, national and intemational journalisfis and photographers. In addifion to almost every major daily newspaper in the U.S., the media contingent will also include journalists and photographers from over 15 nations. PRIORITY GIVEN TO SUPPORTERS As has been our praciice, if the Sfate of Washington wins the bid fio host the 2009 World Figure Skating Championships, those that have supported our efforfs will be rewarded. Those that have purchased tickets fo the 2007 State Farm U.S. Figure Skating Championships will be given priority. The companies that have supported the U.S. Championships in Spokane as Major Local Sponsors also wifl be given the iirst opporfunity for involvemenfi. Contacts Toby Steward & Barb Beddor Star USA 509-448-6829 i-~ EAST VALLE-Y SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 361 . , SChool 051dontial Peputy. F'ropo5a I C..~okane County CorrimI5510n(5M and ~ City of 4ouno V~40y _ ~ Christine Burgess, Superintendent Richard Cook, Manager of Fiscal Affairs 12325 East Grace Spokane, WA 99216 ~ ~ (509) 924-1830 ~ . ~ of ~ VL/~~✓ Frapo5al !5..pmmary 1 aatetic5 f rm the S~el-P5 Office 2-b s-ae~r r~la-~on ~y ay & coulty 9 . . - . ,9Wrt Letf.,~r from WeSt Valley xwl Pbtricr 10 ~ ~ - ~ ~ • Last Valley School District would like to have support from the Ciey of, SPokane Valley and Spokane • County to cstablish a School Ftesidential Deputy (STtD) at East Valley School l7istrict to be housed at East Valley High School for improvcd community safety. " A depufy or officer assigned to our community schools has had a proven positive impact throughout the County and is essential in the followinb issues: • Proven Success - Other school districts have had ovenwhelming suceess with this progr~im. (Letter fram West Valley Attached) • Campus lssues - a quick response to serious activities in progress, assiscing untrained staff in these arcas. During the past year, East Valley rligh School has recorded these incidents - 44 druglalcohol, 49 tobacco, 58 harassmc►it, 6 weapons, 42 thefts alid numerous vandalism incidents across the district. SRD presence may act as a deterrent as well as a resource to assist in investigation of these types of crimes. Provide one on one interaction with studencs ancl follow up with parents or guardians. improve ovei-a11 personal safety of studencs and staff: • Psrkiug Lot Issues - there are many student and auesC driving and parking problems tFiat could get some inuneciiate attenrion for impraved safety at all levels. Bus areas are sometimes a real safely problem, which could be improved with somc SRD invrolvement. Srudent parkino lot issues for safety would also be improved. • Neighborhood Presei►ce - several areas in our district arc known as high crime areas. Law enforcement presence would act as a detErrcnt to some aF ihese activities. Also, the officer could work with ]ocal businesses and residents on student issues relaled to driving, trespassing, malicious mischief, ecc. ` 0 Education -provide education on various issues to administration and stafF'as-well-as , classrooni activities for st'uclents. This helps build a positive life long relalionship between tlle community and law enforcement. Collaboration tivith lhe Dean of Students to improve student relations in the areas of assaults, drugs, harassment to name a few. • Prevention - providing a presence in our schools has provcn to create a proaccive policing environinent by gaining infonnation About issues from students leading to drug dealing intervention and a reduction of fights. School shootings are less likely to occur in a school that has an SR.D prese•uce. . • Resource - access to police reports and promotivn of a coliaborative efCort benveen the commtmity schools and law enforeerncnt. Pravide support to parents of stucients with ' counseling needs. Scouts venturing program support. 1'rovide consistent after school event supPort. Access to snident population for investigation of crime by law enforcemcnt. The cost of this program to Last Valley School District would be to contribute S 15,000 toward the cost of Iielciing an officer, as is done with all otlier Spokane County School Districts. The total 'cost is currently estimated at abnut S1.00,000 per year. The counl'y and ciCy, in our case, would sllare the remaining cost of fielding a School Resource Qi'ficer through available grants and otber local fiinding. This person would be available to East Valley School I7istrict during the school year being houscd at East Valley Fligh School and to the county or city for training and other police work during the suininer. ` 1 ~ . CAD INCIDENTS WITHIN TWO BLOCKS OF ANY EAST VALI.EY SCHOOL BY HOUR OF DAY 09/05/2005 -10/3112005 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 7oi81 911A 0 0 0 Q 0 0 1 1 0 0 ' 2 0 4 ACCINJ 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ANIMAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 ASISTC 0 0 O I 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 ASLT 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 CC 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 ' CHKEV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 I CUSINT 0 0 0 0 0 OI 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 DRUGS 0 0 0 1 0 0 'I 0 0 0 0 0 2 DUI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 N OVOPS 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 4 FIGHT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 1 0 0 1 FOLLOVJ 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 1 FOUNDP 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 a 0 0 2 HARASS 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 IPJFO 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O I 0 0 1 JVRUN 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 h9ALMS 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 . RECKDf2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 SUICA 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 SUSCIR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 SUSPEF2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 ~ . . ~ . ~ ~ : -~.i - . • f' • " , . i' • , . 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 115 16 17 18 , Total SUSVEH 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 TNEFI' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 THREAT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 • TRANStA 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 TS 2 1 1 0 3 2 F 2 0 0 1 2 0 14 VEHREC ( 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 WARRNT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 1 0 0 0 1 WEIFAR 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Tofal 3 S 6 3 5 3 13 8 3 4 6 1 58 W . , r-- ' ~ CAD INCIDENTS WITHIN TWO BLOCKS OF ANY EAST VALLEY SCHOOL BY HOUR OF DAY 01/03/2005 - 0610512005 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Total 911A 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 4 1 11 ABAN 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 ACC 0 1 0 0 0 1 01 1 0 0 0 4 ACCFtR 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 O I 1 [ACCINJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 ~ ADULTUI 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ALA4C 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ALIviR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 ASISTA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 ASISTC 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 OI 0 1 ~ ASLT 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 ATL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 CC 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 CHILQF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 CHKEV 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 CIVIL 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 CONTOF 0 1 0. 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 CON7P 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 6 DRUGS 0 0 0 2 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 7 DUI 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 DV 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 DVOPS 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 . - . . . . - ~ i ~ , . • ~ i Q,~ti 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 tiQ 15 16 17 18 7otal ' DVOPV 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 DVV) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 FO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 FOLLOW 0 1 1 0 3 1 0 0~ 0 1 0 0 7( FOUNDB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 I 0 0 0 0 1 FRVt'KS U 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 INFO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 JVRUN 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 PEf2W 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 RECKDR 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 5 SEXCRI 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 SUICA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 : SUSCIR 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 SUSVEH 1 0 1 0 0 O I 1 0 0 1 0 0 4 THEFT 1 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 TRANS 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 TRAPJSM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OI 0 0 1 0 1 TRBLU 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 TRESP 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 TRFHAZ 0 'I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 TS 5 3 3 2 3 2 2 7 10 5 1 4 47 VEHPRO ( 0 0 0 1 0 0 OI 0 0 0 0 0 1 VEHREC 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 2 WELFAR 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 i^- --ti 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Total ' FTotal 8 9' 12 11 76 11 14 20 16 13 12 T 149 'i 2101l05 ~ . - ~...i . i--. • ~ . CAD INCIDENTS WITHIN TWO BLOCKS OF ANY EAST VALLEY SCHOOL BY HOUR OF DAY ' 0910412004 -12/20/2004 . J 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 l8 Total 911A 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 4 ABAN 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 6 ACC 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 ACCNR 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 ACCINJ 0 'I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Al.A+iC 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 5 ALMR 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ARGUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 ASLT 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 4 y BURGC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 CC 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 . CIVIL 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 1 CONTP 0 2 1 3 2 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 13 CUSINT 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 DISORD 0 0 1 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 1 ~RUGS 0 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 T DUI 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 DV 0 0 0 0 0 0~ 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 FIGHT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 FOLIOW 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 5 FOUNDP 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 GRAF 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 4 r~. , • , • . I . --f • - ~ . 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Total ~ JVRUN 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 MALA4S 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 OI 2 ORV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 PRKVIO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 O I 0 1 RECKDR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 3 SUICA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 ' SUSCIi2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 SUSPER 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 SUSVEH O I 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 5 THEFT 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 co THREAT 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 TRANS 0 0 0 0 0 0~ 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 TRESP 0 0 0 0 0 O I 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 TRFHAZ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 , TS 3 5 i 0 2 1 1 1 7. 12 2 1 1 36 UGUEST 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 VEHTf"l' 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 WELFAR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 I 0 0 0 0 1 Yotal 5 13 5 13 8 9 15 21 18 12 11 4 134 12/01l65 r - , East Valley School District #361 Estimated Students by City or County ~ September 2005 , Based Qn School Enrollment , Head Count School Vly City Counry 7olal Trent 429 429 Trenhvoad 308 308 Otis 243 243 East Farms 375 375 Skyview 209 209 EVMS 540 540 MVMS 464 464 EVHS 770 661 1,431 - CCS 98 96 192 Connections 20 18 38 GED 6 5 11 Total 2,378 1,862 4,240 56.1 % 43.9% Head Count is based on total nurnber of students High School is split on Middle School Ratio. Kindergarten is only half time. r- ~ ~ Based On Zi Code ~ Wead Count Hi h School Onl ZIP Code VI Ci Count VI Ci Coun - 99004 1 Cheney 1 99005 1 Colbert 99016 19 Greenacres 11 99019 13 Liberty Lake 8 99021 3 Mead 1 98025 1,130 Newman Lake 391 99027 989 Otis Orchards 349 99037 12 Veradale _ 6 , 99156 1 Newport I 9920X 19 Spokane 4 99206 795 Spokane Valley 210 99212 15 Millwood 3 99214 4 Spokane Valley 1 99215 2 Spokane Valley 99216 1,295 Spokano Valley 377 99217 158 Spokane Valley 58 00000 15 15 None 5 5 Sub Total 2,300 2,187 668 763 51.3% 48.7°io 46.7% 53.3% Total 4,487 1,431 ~ - f ~ - 9 West Valley School District No. 363 Bo„d a,a~~fam 1aR,_s Mmm,ts ' Sapcrrntcndent Alorfh 2905Arywrnp 11faln UHiro PdmW.aMc' ea7 a. wxvy r. aro~,rey P.O. eax 11739 • =r sos-s24-zaso vty Suywintendent Spekar,c, l!A 9921! Adm!nfstnubn Oi(Tco FF'JC RppaT {y~;NyRry ti'. mgfas it Msfsoq CFA 504.9225235 i `s EQl;a10~,4+~rhu;iry,' ~ . wobx~Yo L~ctbicafprfrlal sisian! Supafnlendent pp;vrnyvc qction FarpApycr ; wvmwfy~ com Or, Genc Srnfrn;i Ra'iC-q Dvncier '1Go'S Aro Oiur Et+sinoss' December 8, 2005 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Please find this as a Ietter of support for East Valley School District as they pursue their request for a school residential deputy. West Valley has had a uniformed deputy serve as our school resource officer for the past six years and isvery dedicated to continuing with the program. . Following are a few of the many benefits that we have gleaned from having a unPformed school resource officer: • Our SRO program has helped us to act aggressively and quickiy when dealing with drug offenses in our schools, particularly when drug distribution is involved. As a result, the number of drug related incidents has been reduced in our schools. We also believe there is an accompanying drop in drug usage. ' . • Our SRO has been an invaluable resource as we conduct investigations and interrogations. ' . • Our SRO has helped to develop positive relationships with our community as he ~ responds quickly and effectively to requests and concems. C.. • West Valley has a large number of high trafFc areas that are frequented by our students. . Through his presence, and that of large group traffic focus patrols, our students are safer as they go to and from school. • Our SRO has been invaluable in problem sotving investigations involving probable cause standards and reasonable suspicion standards with our other security personnel and school administrators. • Our SRO has proven, time and again, to be an invaluable resource when dealing with sensitive and often explosive child custody and CPS issues. • Firially, and pefiaps most importantly, our students are able to develop positive and respectFul relationships with law enforcement that will serve them well throughout their lives. This list could go on and on, as this is only a few of the benefits of having a uniformed school resflurce officer as part of our West Valley community. Plsase feel free to call if we can be of assistance. , Sincerely, ~ . . - - Dr. Poll Cro `vley . Superintendent 'West Valley School District ! . i ~ 10 Wesf Valfey School Disfricf's Mission S4atement Mest Vurtey ScAool 1k5ricd- a partncrs'qp of sttnknfs, paients edUrsars, eitd oommurnr/ memte+~s -is canna~ ;cd to cnsuing o sah:. nurhrring envift7r,~etif nti1eR ~+O,Cfe are draMnped to: ind'vitlvsf resp- sfAlAp; acacemL a= 0'enca, acYSnranf sucres; arxfVh:JOVrg leerri:rng by crrtpRastrlnp ser-Ostoe.m, reCOCfing cenvnur,rty rarue:, :.,ndre:peetirV cfivws, fy rijJe manta'viing a d/nam'c visron ta:iro fvfruc, . CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY r Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 6, 2005 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ED information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Administrative Report. Ad Hoc Sign Committee report on the Blue Signs GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Not Applicable PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: On July 19, 2005, City Council requested review of the "Blue Signs" by the Ad Hoc Sign Commiftee. BACKGROUND: The Ad Hoc Committee met several times following the issuance the Deputy ~ City Attomey's opinion on signs. The findings and recommendation of the Committee are attached. _ . RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Not applicable - BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS: None. . STAFF CONTACT: Marina Sukup, AICP, Community Development Director ATTACHMENTS: Report - S ikN P,ne ~ . Valley • 11707 E 5prague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley V/A 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 * cityhall0spokanevalley.org Memorandum To: Dave Mercier, City Manager and Members of City Council From: Ad hac Sign Committee ' CC: Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager, Neil Kersten, Public Works Director Date: November 16, 2005 Re: Business Directional Signs (Blue Signs) On July 19, 2005, the City Council requested that the Ad Hoc Sign Committee review and . make a policy recommendation conceming business directional signs. Currently there are twenty-two signs located on Appleway Boulevard identifying 102 businesses located on Sprague Avenue. The signs were placed,on Appleway by Spokane County at the time that Sprague Avenue was converted to a one-way west of University Boulevard. Each business identified was required to have a physical address on Sprague Avenue and was charged a one-time fee of $175.00. ; The Committee's analysis focused on answering fhe following questions: 1. Are the current signs effective in directing traffic to businesses advertised? 2. If ineffective, why? 3. In what manner could they be made more effective? 4. What alternatives should be considered by the City? 5. What are the implications for other one-way c4mmercial streets where the same conditions exist e.g. ArgonnelMullan and Sprague Avenue itself? . 6. What are the cost implications and how should business be charged? Analysis: In response to the first two questions, the Committee finds that the existing signs are ineffective in directing traffic to and/or advertising the named businesses for the following reasons: • The existing signs are poorly maintained and identify a number of businesses no longer in existence. The block numbers are inadequate to direct motorists. • Too many businesses are included on a single sign for motorists to discern and select. • The spacing of the signs at approximately 100 feet does not provide sufficient time for motorists to both process the information included on the sign and to execute the necessary traffic maneuvers. ~ . Ad Hoc Sign Committee Recommendation , November 29, 2005 Page 2 of 4 ~ • The blue background with white lettering has insufficient contrast to be effective. Lettering less than four inches or text of more than hvo lines is illegible. Logos are too small. In addressing the third question, the Committee determined that the existing signs would be more effective if: • Contrast between the letters and background was increased, with black letters on a white background preferred. • Letters were a minimum of four inches in height. . • Text was limited to two lines - one line more effective. • The block number was included at the top of the sign, rather than as a tag at the bottom. • Signs were reflective (Scotchlite). • • The signs were somewhat larger. • The changes would not address the problem of the spacing between signs. In reviewing the fourth question, the use of an electronic message center was suggested as an alternative. This alternative was not given serious consideration for the following reasons: • High cost. Costs are based on the number of lines and size of type, and the number of reader boards that would be required to advertise all businesses. • Technical limitation, including the size and number of businesses that could be identified. To be visible the sign would need a 12 inch character viewable from 600 feet. With a 15 second vie+ruing time at 35 mph, it would be necessary to hold a frame for at least 5 seconds for it to be readable. Up to four businesses could be identified at a time, assuming four lines of type. Fifteen is probably the maximum number of businesses that could be identified on a single electronic reader board. The boards should be spaced at intervals of not less than 500 feet. • Assigning responsibility for maintenance of inessages. • Extending power to a location within the right-of-way. • Safety concerns with placement within the right of way. The Committee discussed the equity of allowing signage along Appleway, while denying the same advertising/directional opportunities to similarly situated businesses located on Appleway or located on the Argonne/Mullan couplet. They noted the following: • ArgonnelMullan does not have many of the same issues as the SpraguelAppleway couplet because of the close proximity of the streets to one another. • Additional signage in the right-of-way would interfere with the interests of the businesses actually fronting on the roadway where the signs are located. • Insufficient right-of-way. • Safety concerns. . . The Committee sought an estimate on the cost of replacing the existing signs from National Barricade & Sign Company. NB&SC provides signs for the Washington Department of ' Transportation and fabricated the existing "blue" signs located on Appleway for Spokane Gounty. Estimafes are for- two color Seotchlite signs.- The present signs are 48° x 48". Ad Moc Sign Committee Recommandation . November 29, 2005 _ Page 3 of 4 Aluminum for sign fabrication is available in 48° x 96° sheets_ Irregular sizes will require °windbeam" or angle iron for an additional cost. Signs larger than 48" x 96" will require two I~ posts for stability. As an example, a 6' x 6' sign would require 3 4vindbeams, six feet in length for an additional cost of $108.00. ($6.00 x 3 x 6). The text or logo could vary based on the size of the sign and the number of subscribers. Logo charges depend on the number of c4lors, size and complexity. A summary of estimated costs is shown in the following table. Siae Desui tion Unit Cost Qt Toial Cost 48x48 0.08 Aluminum $128.00 22 $2,816.00 48x36 0.08 Aluminum $262.40 22 $5,772.80 48x96 0.125 Aluminum $315.40 22 $6 938.80 ' Ins4allation $200.00 22 $4,400.00 20x20 0.08 Aluminum $32.80 105 $3,444.00 . 20x20 0.063 Aluminum $29.95 105 $3,144.75 Based on these figures, the cost for replacing the existing signs would be $10,660. Larger signs would range from $13,616 to $14,782 installed (excluding taxes). The initial cost per o business for a fully subscribed sign (assuming 6 businesses per sign) would be as follows:. Installed Fulty ~ Size Gost Subscribed 48x48 $524.80 $87.47 48x96 $659.20 $109.87 ' 48x9E $71220 $118.70 Annual maintenance costs have not been evaluated. The cost of a single face monochromatic electronic message center is summarized as follows: - Lines Cost 1 $10,000.00 2 $15 000.00 • 3 $20,000.00 4 $25,OOQ.00 Inland Sign°s representative does not believe that installation of one or more electronic reader boards is feasible because of the number of businesses. He noted that a single line would identify the name of the business but would not permit a message. . Ad Hoc Sign Committee Recommendafion . November 29, 2005 Page 4 of 4 Recommendations: 1. The Ad Hoc Siqn Committee does not recommend replacement of the existinq signs, either with siqns of the same or a larqer size. 2. If the Council believes that the signs should be replaced with those ofi a similar or larger size, reflective signs with a white background and black lettering should be used. Lettering should be not less than four inches and not more than two lines of text should be used. Limiting the number of businesses to four per sign would allow larger lettering and a more effective sign. This does not address the ineffectiveness of closely spaced signs. 3. If the Council believes the signs should be replaced, a meeting should be held with all potential subscribers to discuss an initial and annual maintenance charge. Signs should not be erected unless fully subscribed. 4. If Council believes that directional signage should be continued, it should not be extended beyond the one-way portion of Appleway. ~ ~-1 ~ . CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action ~i Meeting Date: December 20, 2005 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑conse„t p oia business ❑ new business ❑ puWic hearing 0 informabon ❑ admin. report ❑ pending Iegistadon AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Regional Pavement Cut Policy Report GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 10.05.080 PRE1/IOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council Approved the Spokane County/City of Spokane Regional Pavement Cut Policy (RPCP) in July of this year. . BACKGROUND: The City has inifiiated the Regional Pavement Cut Policy (RPCP) after Council approved fihat policy in July. The City approved a second Right-of-Way Inspector and an increase in ROW/Obstruction Permit fees at that time. That new position rEmains vacant pending an analysis of the City's ROW process. . The City contracted with David Evans and Associates (DEA) to provide ROW/Obstruction Permit Inspection, to analyze the effect of previous pavement patches on our road surfaces and to evaluate and make recommendations on our current permitting'and inspection process. DEA is finished with the Scope of Work outlined in their initial contract. We not only completed all of the initial inspections for those permits issued under the RPCP but revisited all of the previously issued City of Spokane Valley ROW/Obstruction permits to assess the quality of patch work being done in our streets and to gauge compliance with permitting requirements. During this assessment instances of tfie Municipal Code and the RPCP have appeared as well as other shortfalls, that if addressed would help us develop a higher quality compliance program. Several issues have appeared during this assessment. J.. Collecting a specifc bond associated with Obstruction Permits is probably not cost effective. Licensed contractors are already bonded, and. causing them to obtain an additional bond for a relatively small amount of work may not have any resulting positive impact for the City. The RPCP does not require a bond, but seems to rely on warrantee of work as a substitute. This issue is being contemplated by our staff and would be an adminisfirative interpretafiion. 2. Limiting the dme an Obstrucaon Permit is valid would allow us a window of time to inspett and finalize permits. Right now permits are open ended and if no work is ever done, remain open forever. Although SVMC requires notification prior to beginning work as well as when the work is finished, there is no time limit for an Obstrucaon Permit to be active. A 30 day time limit for an Obstruction Permit from the date of issuance with a one time extension of 30 days at the request of the permittee is suggested. 3. It appears that many ROW patches have been done without the benefrt of any City Obstruction Permit. Currently violation of SVMC Chapter 10.05 Article II Construction Work and Activity within Right-of-Way is a class I civil infraction. However, this is a complicated legal process that is filed by the County prosecutor and may result in $500 total fine+ costs. Staff would recommend making the violation much like other SVMC violations by amendment of 10.05.210 Violation-Penalties by 'deleting the current language and directly referencing SVMC 10.30.150-600 as the recourse for the City to follow violations, much like the City now pursues Code Compliance Violatians. 4. There may be a need to facilitate issuance of larger, project type permits for sewer or utility installation that would run longitudinalfy along a street instead of perpendicularly ~ - from an address. Additional inspection tirrie would result from a long utility installation, for instance a new water or gas line installation. Although this type of ROW/Obstruction Permit may be infrequent, a$70.00 permit will not equate fio project inspection costs. Staff is evaluating the organizafiional structure of the ROW function based upon DEA's activides A presentation updating City Council on these endeavors will be scheduled as soon as that evaluation is complete. OPTIONS: Continue with the current RPCP, incorporate the changes mentioned above, or provide other direction. . RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Provide feedback and direction on the policy issues desrribed above. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Relative to policy issues described above: 1. Increase staff efficiency as predictability of permit validity promotes final inspection to close permits. 2. Increase receipts as compliance with SVMC will become more consistent. 3. Establishing a method for calculating larger project fees as opposed to a single permit fee will allow inspection cost recovery for larger projects. STAFF CONTACT: Spokane Valley Building Official Scholtens ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoinfi presentation Excel spread sheet showing the results of our Pavement Cut and Obstruction Inspettions as performed by DEA. Spokane Valley Building Division Regional Pavement Cut Policy Report ~ . . Regional Pavement Cut Policy Report • In July, City Council adopted the Regional Pavement . Cut Policy by motion. • In late September, as a result of staff turnover, we reassessed our approach to the Regional Pavement . Cut Policy. • We also evaluated the effectiveness of previous wo'rk done under the original street standards relative to the "Right-of-Way/Obstruction" permits back to the date of incorporation. . , J - 1 . i il i Regional Pavement Cut Policy Report • In addition to pavement cuts ROW/ Obstruction Permits also include: - Street/Lane blockage due to construction • Requires revieev of traffic plan by our Traffic Engineer and at least two inspections. - Approach/Driveway Permit • Requires at least one inspection but possibly two. - Oversized Load Permit • Requires at least one inspection to verify transit with no damage to City property. l Regional Pavement Cut Policy Report • David Evans and Associates were contracted to provide: - ROW/Obstruction Inspection service. - Analysis of current policy and past street patches. 2 l~ . DEA Report • Pavement is generally in very good condition throughout the city. • Many recent patches have been done without a permit. (Look like they are within 3 yrs.) • Often it appears as if a contractor takes out a permit and uses one permit for a bunch of cuts along a block. . More current cuts are being done better than the older cuts. Next Steps........ • ROW Permit Application is now one page to . facilitate fax communication with the applicant. • The approved Application becomes the Permit - Scanning applicatiori into the PLUS tracking system. - More detail on Application will identify cuts vs. obstructions vs. approach permits. • - Inspector will be able to carry an electronic image of application into the field on a notebook computer ~ 3 / /More Steps.... • Staff will actually inspect high % of cuts prior to patch to verify work quality and permit issuance. • Use GPS to track location of work for warranty inspection, Pavement Management as well as account for one permit for each pavement cut. • Work with the City Traffic Engineer to verify traffic , control plan and control devices for streetllane obstruction permits. Although some pennits will require special control devices, we are trying to standardize the requirements for the simple pavement cut/patch or obstruction permit. And more....! : • Continue to analyze the labor requirements to operate our City ROW Inspection services prior to filling second ROW Inspector position. • Report back to Council in early `06 with additional updated information. 4 Regional Pavement Cut Policy Report • Questions? ~ , 5 Current Policy (July to October 2005) • Number avement Cut Failed cuts not found duplicate in progres • 227 44 35 12 44 35 0 0 12 Permits requiring pavement cuts 19.38a/o / Failing pavement cuts 79.55°!0 Failure no 227 25 4.41 °k Prepolicy (January - June 2005 Number avement Cut Failed cuts not found du licate in progres_ 25 0 0 25 5 2 25 5 1 25 0 0 1 25 1 1 1 25 3 2 25 1 0 25 1 0 25 5 0 25 2 1 25 10 3 25 11 3 1 25 10 ~ 2 25 9 3 ( 25 4 1 1 25 6 1 ~ 9 1 1 409 74 21 0 2 2 ~ Permits requiring pavement cuts 18.09% Failing avement cuts 28.38% Prepolicy (September - December 2004) Number Pavement Cut Failed cuts not found duplicate in progres 25 1 1 1 25 3 3 15 1 0 65 5 4 0 1 0 Permits requiring pavement cuts 7.69% Failing pavement cuts 80.00% Eden System Number Pavement Cut Failed cuts not found outsideCL duplicate 23 3 1 23 0 0 2 23 2 1 1 23 6 3 23 6 2 23 2 0 23 2 0 23 2 1 3 23 1 0 8 10 23 0 0 19 4 11 0 0 . 11 23 2 0 23 0 0 23 8 1 23 1 0 ~ 23 6 1 23 4 0 zs 8 1 23 7 0 23 4 2 23 9 6 23 4 3- 23 1 0 23 1 0 . 23 0 0 . 23 1 0 23 5 3 23 4 1 23 ~ 1 0 23 1 1 1 23 1 0 23 1 U . 23 1 1 23 1 1 23 2 2 23 5 1 23 4 2 23 4 3 23 1 1 23 1 1 23 1 0 - 23 0 0 23 1 0 1 23 1 0 23 3 0 23 0 0 23 4 1 23 2 1 23 2 0 23 7 4 23 1 0 23 0 0 23 S 2 23 4 2 ' 23 1 0 23 1 0 23 1 0 23 0 0 23 4 0 23 0 0 23 1 0 23 3 1 • 23 0 0 23 6 0 23 0 0 23 1 0 23 1 0 23 0 0 23 0 0 23 7 0 23 3 1 23 8 2 23 2 0 - 23 3 0 23 4 2 , 23 1 0 1 23 1 0 1 23 3 1 23 1 0 23 0 0 23 3 1 23 0 0 23 0 0 23 0 0 23 1 0' 1943 199 57 43 17 2 Permits raquiring pavement cuts 10:24% Failing pavement cuts 28.64% Eden System (from Connie Number Pavement Cut Failed cuts not found outsideCL dupiicate 19 1 1 26 0 0 26 2 1 15 1 0 1 86 4 2 1 0 0 Permits requiring pavement cuts 4.65% Failing pavement cuts 50.00°Jo . - . I r Grand Totals 2730 326 119 Permits requiring pavement cuts - 11.94% . . Failing pavement cuts 36.50% Failing cuts (less as-builts 28,83% ~ CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY ~ I Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 20, 2005 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ~j new business ~ ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ~ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Request for Proposals - Sprague/Appleway Corridor Subarea Plan, to include 1) Auto-Row, 2) City Center and 3) Remainder of Sprague/Appleway Corridor. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: The Subarea Plan must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA), RCW 36.70A. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council authorized funding for the project in the 2006 budget. BACKGROUND: In the spring of 2004 City Council hired ECONorthwest to conduct an economic analysis of the Sprague/Appleway Corridor. ECONorthwest teamed with Freedman, Tung and Bottomley, a land use and urban design consultant, to prepare the analysis. In September 2004, the consultant team met with City staff, stakeholders, and the Spokane Valley City Council to discuss the preliminary results of this study and begin to explore strategies to optimize land use, transportation, and ecohomic benefits of the corridor. Following are potential strategies and aciions identified by the consultants that Spokane Valley could employ to redevelopment the Sprague/Appleway corridor: 1. Reduce the amount of land intended for c4mmercial development along the Corridor. 2. Consider reduction of land intended for new retail development outside the corridor to ensure the market does not produce excess supply of competing retail space. 3. Go with the marketplace: provide retail concentrations at major crossroads (in amounts that do not overwhelm market demand) in compact, walkable, ulifestyle center" / city center type configurations. Identify opportunity sites at primary crossroads as candidates for clusters. 4. Plan corridor restructuring in relation to the envisioned pattern of retail in the City and region. The Comprehensive Plan is a major opportunity for the City to ptan the healthy coexistence of a pattern of commercial centers: how many and what types are desirable and supportable? . 5. Plan neighborhood-serving retail and services in limited clusters at strategic locations (facing the corridor) to provide convenient shops and services within walking distance of homes andlor workplaces. 6. Promote the continued success of specialty segments, e.g. auto sales and services. Cluster such specialized uses whenever possible. Focus improvements on "gateways" to create positive identity and add visibility to city's commitment to revitalization. 7. Work toward a"Catalyst Project." Look for opportunities to redevelop Ugreyfield" malls no - longer advantageously located. Promote the development of a Town Center at the U-City - Mall site. 8. Modify land use and development policies to focus high-quality residential, workplace, and lodging investment along the majority of properties fronting the Sprague. Focus the comprehensive planning process on land use decisions that consider transitioning the most damaged segments away from retail. What form should residential segments take? As resources allow, focus capital improvements on setting the stage for residential development in targeted segments. 9. Agree on compatible street improvements prioritized by segment and community's land use and development goals. Focus street improvement resources to re-configure each segment to create environments that are supportive of the enhanced market focus of the desired forms of investment. That is, each segmenYs development types must be paired with the , appropriate form of street design. 10. Provide for cross couplet access opportunities and require cross-access easements to adjacent developments to lessen the need for traffic circulation to access the adjacent street network. • 11. Seek shared parking opportunities and provide for pedestrian scale access to adjacent uses. 12. Provide for multimodal access and facilities along the couplet and enhance the pedestrian environment to and between land uses. 13. Provide adequate signage to allow for driver decisions in advance of access opportunities. 14. Make some immediate improvements to gain momentum toward the bigger ones: • Program for modest clean-up and fix-up • Code enforcement • Facilitation of business improvement district. The Draft Comprehensive Plan currently under review by City Council initiates some of these strategies and actions through changes to land use designations along the Corridor. The project, as proposed, will fine-tune the land use designations, provide a foundation developing the Ciry Center and address the needs of the auto dealers located in "Auto Row.° OPTIONS: 1) Authorize staff to proceed with RFP as presented; 2) Provide direction to revise the RFP. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Council consensus to move forward with publishing and distributing the RFP as presented, or with changes as directed by Council. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: City Council has authorized $250,000 in the 2006 City Budget for this project. STAFF CONTACT: Marina Sukup, Community Development Director ATTACHMENT Draft Request for Proposals - SpraguelAppleway Corridor Subarea Plan , . ~ i s Cl~'~' UF ~ ~W; p ,;o*.Valle . ; „ . ~ Request for P:roposals ~ Sprague/=Appteway,~Corr.idor Subarea~Plan~~. ~ K .f• • ,w _ ~,F~ 1~ ~y P: . k r n~i n Proposal~F'ackages to: - , Y. .;k _.X. Marina Sukup, AICP, Director Co.mmunity Development Department . City of Spokane Valley - fr w. H'. 1y1~707 E. Sprague Avenue, Suite 106 . Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Submittal Date: January 31, 2006 by 5:00 pm PST 1 I. Introduction J The Ciry of Spokane Valley seeks proposals for consulting services to assist the City in developing a Subarea Plan, implementing regulations and phased capital improvement schedute for the Sprague-Appleway Corridor. The total length of the Corridor is approximately 9.5 miles; the project area is approximately 6 miles, from the I-90 interchange at Sprague Avenue to Sullivan Road. (See Map 1 attached) - II. Background The City of Spokane Valley incorporated on March 31, 2003 ~The City's current population of 85,000 people is spread out over 38 square miles. Spokane<Valley is a typicaf suburban community, without a distinct city center or identity. ThGity of~Spokane is contiguous to our western border, the City of Liberty Lake is located aPproximately threemiles east of Spokane Valley and the State of Idaho lies further to the east;~`.:, ~•~~,a , Spokane Valley is bisected east to west by both Interstate 90 and Sprague'Avenue, a 9.5 mile corridor of strip commercial development. T~e`~Sprague-Apple,way Cor-ridor (the^CoRidor) is home to thriving new and used automobile businesses but also has many vacant~ retail/commercial buildings and struggling local b$inesses fA successful new mall is located in the northeastem area of the city between two infecchanges on I-90. The aesthetically challenged Corridor"currently expenences-traffic delays at a few of the major intersections, lacks safe pedestnan\facilities, unrestricted\d'riveway access and a high level of collisions. , III. Corridor Planning~Hi'.stoiy~. ~ A. Spokane`Ual" lev Comprehensive Plan:. Spokane Valley is close to adopting its first ~ Comprehensive~lan. The DraftlPlan, curre ~tly\under review by City'Council, seeks to transform the Corridor into,a mix°ofroffice, residential and commercial land uses, focusing tradit~ ommercial,activ'ty-at major,arterial'-iritersections. Areas in between the Commerciatlintersecbons. are intended to•transition from strip commercial to residential, o,ffices, and-`busir~esses.that.generate higher levels of employment. The Draft Plan identifies ~ ~ -~.3.: the'U-City area along Sprague.Avenue as a mixed-used, pedestrian supportive City Center. \ ` The westem portion,of>the C'orriclor is home to many major auto dealers and the Draft Comprehensive Planproposes poicies to support and enhance this "Auto-Row° area. B~Y~Hiqh Capacity Transit: The Spokane Transit Authority has been planning a high capacify, ttansit (HCT)!system through Spokane Valley for a number of years. The project has focused on`ight rail'and-bus rapid transit as potential modes of high capacity transportation. \ k J The project identifes~the U-City area as a main transit stop; in the fall/winter of 2004/05, the Portland consultirig'frm Crandall and Arambula conducted a transit oriented development (TOD) study to determine the feasibility and economic development potential of TOD at U-City. Information on the project can be found at the following link: http://www.sqokaneliqhtrail.com/spokanelightrail/ 2 • ~I . 'u'_ m ' ~ . -~„9,4; .,y_ r .y~+_ J-7 3i.. , I g. _ 1 •t u: , =F . „c -r ~},6 ik~~ • -nr ~n it ' ~ ' !rn j: ~ ~.'I y _ t~~ .'L1.S~ - - - ~~1'i it: ' 1 • _ . =S, '~~'=N I ~`~~T'~_ • ~ - e~3~ ii.:if .~°.-~l7 ' x r ~ _rrr I "I~ ` • t I { ' ; ' ~ c •~9, !at~,.~r. ~ ~ i C. Spraque/Applewav Economic Analysis: City Center Simulation The City of Spokane Valley contracted ECONorthwest in the fall of 2004 to conduct an analysis of transportation and land use issues in the Corridor. The study provided an objective - . and understandable evaluation, from primarily an economic perspective, of the transportation and land use issues in the Corridor. The ~ Transpo Group and Freedman, Tung & Bottomley assisted with this study. In the sp g of 2005, the Spokane Valley City Council ~ brought badc Michael Freedman of Freedman, Tung & Bottomley for a presentatian to local business and property owners on,'the land use and transportation issues along the ~orridor, ~ ~N.,,, D. Appleway Extension: In late 0.01, Spokane County completed construction of a couplet system from 1-9Q~to UniversityRoad approximately-3 miles in length. The new road, ~ ~ , ~ z ~ i Appleway Boulevard, -is~4-lanes eastbound;,Sp~ ague Avenue~was turned into a 5 lane, one- way westbound street. The City, is currentlyT evaluating the purpose and need for the extension i of Appleway east~of Universityto Sullivan'Road along an abandoned rail right-of-way. A_ Ap~;.~r' , A V ° :e significant amaunt of environrnental analysis, has been completed for construction of the existing couplef,and,for the,pos ible-extension of Appleway. IV. Projec Dscription , Spokane Valley,seeks a qu:.alfied consultant team to prepare a Subarea Plan, draft ,Jmplementing regulafions and identify critical, fundable capital improvements for the Sprague/Appleway Corridor. Under direction of the Spokane Valley Community Development Depa~tment, the team~.will conduct analysis, engage the public and governmental agencies and pre~are reports and'documents with the goal of facilitating approval of the Corridor Subarea='Flan by the SRokane Valley City Council by December, 2006. The Corridor Subarea Plan must-beconsis"~e,6a~with the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, scheduled to be adopted in early~2Q06. The Subarea Plan will focus on three major components within the Corridor. ~ A. City Center (located in the University City Mall area) -As was noted previously, the Cifiy of Spokane Valley incorporated on March 31, 2003. Historically, Spokane Valley was a suburban portion of Spokane County that developed over a number of years and was comprised of a series of smaller communities including Veradale, Greenacres and Opportunity. In a community survey conducted as part of the citizen participation process, residents were asked if they thought the development of a city center was important and if it was important, where would be the best location of a city center. Overwhelmingly, the . 3 response from the community was that the development of a city center was critical to the city in terms of establishing an identity for the new city. The location of city center in the University City area also recefved significant support from those taking part in the survey. B. Auto Row - As noted previously, the City of Spokane Valley is home to a number of new and used automobile dealerships. Several major new auto dealerships are located within the project area and are mostly concentrated in western portion of corridor. The automobile dealerships provide a significant source of tax revenue to the city. Many of the auto dealers have formed an "Auto Row" group that cooperates on advertising,and promotion of the area. C. Balance of the Corridor - Over the course of the last,se `erecades, the Corridor was ' developed in typical strip commercial fashion. The City's comprehensive plan attempts to address this situation by establishing commercial nodes>at;the intersection of major arterials. Moreover, the plan designates the areas between the com ercial nod'es as "Corridor Mixed Use°, which promotes a wider range of uses including~Fiigher density resiclential and some light industrial uses. V. Scope of Work ~ . \ The project consists of furnishing all personnel, mater+als; supervision and travel to generally undertake and complete the following tasks: ~ v A. Review and synthesize existing~plans, stud\ies and documents. The SpragueJ Appleway Corridor has been the subject of£several studies~;andaplans that will serve as the foundation for the'Subarea Plan. Th~es~e studies 'have-produceci:~a signficant amount of data ~ . that needs to be rewewed,analyzed and synthesized:~, F~ - ; . Deliverable: A re,port summarizing the mformation and data available; identifying gaps in the information that the consultant team will need-to gather or produce in order to produce the , Subarea Plan..:, \ ~ ~ 1 B. Public Participation: TheYGiry of:?Spokane Valley emphasizes public participation at everyll~evel,'MoreoverT°fFie`INashington State/Growth Management Act (GMA) requires °early ru~ and~eontinuous„ public participation in the local planning, process. Within the Subarea Plan tiboundaries there, areseveral groups including the Auto Row dealerships, the City Center area ':property owners, locahbusiness,'groups, Valley Chamber of Commerce, elected & appointed ofFicials, citizens of Spokane Vailey and adjacent jurisdictions. : . Deliverable: A detailedipublic participation program that descnbes the participation ~ techni wques to be used;dunng the project as well as the timing of these events in the overall _ planning pcocess. C. Suba ea Plan Development. ,The Washington State GMA requires subarea plans to follow the general requirements of the GMA as it applies to comprehensive plans. The firm will prepare a Subarea Plan for the Corridor which will focus on thee areas: Auto-Row, City Center and the remainder of the Corridor between I-90 and the eastern city limits. ' 1. Auto-Row: The firm will work with auto dealers operating along the western portion of the Corridor to identify policies, programs, regulations and infrastructure . improvements that will enhance the area as a regional destination for auto purchases. 4 2. City Center. The City's Comprehensive Pian identifies the U-City area as Spokane Valley's "City Center". The Firm will develop sc$narios for the City Center and will create a menu of public improvement projects and programs that will foster development of the City Center. The scenarios will include estimated priorities and costs for capital improvements required to transform the area into the desired future form. The consultant will use innovative visual tools to present the altemative scenarios for the City Center Plan. 3. Corridor: The City's Comprehensive Plan focuses community scale commercial activity at major arterial intersections and designates a~es between these commercial nodes as "Corridor Mixed Use° areas. The consultantkwill,refine the current land use AA " designations along the corridor with the objective ofv.redeveloping these areas to office and residential uses and businesses that generate employrnent. ~YN . The consultant will use innovative tools to present land use scenarios, such as high- . quality graphics, pictures, maps and future design simulations. The eonsultant will also ,<;-i ~ make recommendations for implementin~g~regulations, including landscaping, par4cing, design and allowed uses. A specific set of ineasures~designed to implement the preferred land use scenario will be developed . ; The consultant team shall also identify potential:wgateways° along the Corridor. These gateways would identify particular areas sucfi1as"Auto Row" or entering the City of . Spokane Valley from the west~delineating where,the?City of Spokane ends and Spokane Valley begins. This t'askwould'include suggested gateway treatments or capital improvements associated with c eat g^the inte d'ed gateway. ~ V~ ~:t; ~ ~ Deliverable:The:consultant:: team1sFiall,prepare.atisubarea plan that complies with the ~ requirement's,of the 1Nashmgton State GMA. The consultant team will be responsible ~ for presenting a draft plan to the City's,planning commission for comment and formal . public~heanng. The consultant will then,incorporate as appropriate planning - commission input to`the plan; preparinga,°Planning Commission Draft" of the plan to present to City 'Council:'TThe_consultant,will then participate in the presentation of the draft"plan to City Council. Plan Implementation. ~The consultant team will prepare of series of ineasures A~JDJ~ desi ned to im lement•the 'olicy direction of the draft Subarea Plan. These implementation me sures wou d incluiie,~suggested code revisions to the City's development regulations, possible incentives to promote desired land uses, community design guidelines for each area previously identified (Auto Row, City Center and balance of the corridor) and development of a list of potential capital'improvements necessary to advance the policy direction of the Subarea .~k Plan. Deliverable: The-consultant team shalf prepare an "Implementation Report" that includes specific Subarea Plan implementation measures. The implementation measures shall include both regulatory and capital project recommendations. It would be appropriate to include suggested priorities for implementation measures. The capital project recommendations shall include cost estimates for all identified projects. V1. Proposals Submissions of proposal should include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following: 5 . • Description of overall project approach; ~ A brief narrative describing your firm and/or team; • Background and qualifications of specific staff likely to work on this project; • Descriptions of relevant experience, including examples of similar work and related outcomes; • Identify the individual in charge of contrackual arrangements or managing contracts (i.e. project manager); • Proposed fees and charges for the scope of work described2'above; • Methodology (including citizen participation program); AV • A proposed schedule for project completion, with sigriificant mileposts; ~ List of at least four references with contact information: b - The proposal shall be presented in 2 phases. Phase.1*would consist~of the area from I-90 east to University Road. Phase 2 would consist of the~area east of Unive~sity Road to the eastem city limits. Project budgets should reflect=this phased approach to~the,project. VII. Evaluation 8~ Selection f y Proposals will be evaluated on the basis of b\ oth theconsultant(s) and individual team member's experience and expertise'on similar projects;,.3as well as upon the teamffiRn's capacity (personnel and other resources)-to complete`the~Project within the proposed - schedule. A committee will evaluate all'proposals and sho listed finns will be scheduled for a final interview. ~ ~ - - Preference will be givedito consultantsjwho demo sfrate experience in the follovring areas: .~5~: : - • Innovative planning, processes; f ~ : ~ • Successful and timely.public participation; ~K: t • City/Town Center devefopment regulat~ions and community design guidelines; • RedevelopmenUcevitahiation o strip commercial corridors; • Transportafion~planning and stre'et-design; ~ ~ • `•Economie,and fiscal,analysis; ~ Real esfate market~analysis; / ~ • Graphics and~visual ai ds~to represent land use and design altematives. VIII. Tentative Schedule A ten month~schedule'has been established for this project. Proposals should assume a March 15;~2yyy006 start date. • Decembe'rl9, 2005 RFP published • January 31, 2006 Proposals Due • February 1-10, 2006 City review of proposals and selecting firms • February 20 - 24, 2006 Interviews with selected firms • February 27 - March 3, 2006 Contract negotiations with selected firm • March 10, 2006 Contract award - begin project 6 ' IX. Submittal Requirements ~J Five (5) bound and one (1) unbound copy of the proposal shall be submitted not later than 5:00 pm January 31, 2006, PST to Marina Sukup, AICP, Community Development Director, 11707 E. Sprague Ave., Suite 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206. Each proponent should provide the e-mail address of an authorized contact. Questions should be directed to msukup(aD-spokanevalley.orq or you may call (509) 688-0030. Addenda, if any, will be provided by e-mail to all persons requesting updates. The City reserves the right to waive informalities, and to reject~ariy~d all proposals. All proposals shall become the property of the City of Spokane Valley. . / f . ~ ~ h 'ay. \ \ . / • sz::i. :tcr.. Y1. ~ . y. ~ 7 ~ ~~aft Comprehensive Plan . ~ y~ ~,~i ~ ~ . , ^.~.....~~.'!a V. : • ~ - Elu1id A!ae _ , Buwlisl+lrs . =y . . ~,.~f~~- y i Auckeye Ave y~rs~a'~~~ , • . _ , . -Km:A 'w1~r:~iirrcl'1'ir ~ p~~ ` dr,~uu~7 ~rvr , S~p6 YV I'.b r . ' . . . 1. -Miary ~ommerclal lohh~e Auto Row Overlay Mp A wr Bmk~uak AkF _ ~ ~ , ~ C:orridur IVlixed Use City Center vall"iiy Kvc . ` m . ,~i . ` i` ~ t,Y. ,;~`w~. ~ ~;~+ryguc,M1ee ti~~ - . , . ~ . ` y ~ s, . ~f++.:, ~ ~i ~ ~ ~'4'* 4 t : ~ _ 4''~ X ~ 4~ -i ir "l~.11iA.' Pa&h Avc . ~ Eighffi Awle Commun!#y Camme~rc1~1 ~ 2 1 at,LbLAve Erith Avv. Category Low Detuity a~~~did i ~oum DmdtryRcaiamLua z4uh n,C I~ i~gb DeWty Rw~ac"Util 25th dve ~ Miwd [l+c r ~ a , ~D~dt1f M~%C(~ ti6i ~ 3:nd Aiv tityCc~trr tiroTi.i~~q• r+tli~'irr I r. iri:ira~ irf~ rlnt~nr7~" -'r~~fl~:d.'ra m irrti!cJ" ~ P{1~fi7C~41M14!-pR~1~lc aut~t~r,s.~+f+f~it+Jerr 1ir <wu.~r~wr•~~r~h~ ;~ri ~rti~,kr~~ms;lulrn,a ~ rv.~~'fr,mfr~~JJhwlfAe,aL rWr7,;Iix+-a+nmcYdkaA rMIJ! irur! ~ tiei~f7lroCbuOdCnmfitriil ex7+r.ss7s Jrrr {Jxmr urs~r~~~~~ kar i r~iRS araf '++,rt,narms m dIa i .Inwnt, ~ fo.ou~,~irmucrranjo c,~rlpuu4o1lii, 'tm1rfy,rAkitrar'rf7,•w.COMMinur-, Com]rlunilyf4mm4rGUl ~ Er~"+y+~rf1'~iflkjxr,F~.Nd.lyAt•r.u~x~r~jF!,~Ar~9~rr~.r~IhrrT,;.PlN! RCL3min»mnblErC-#l ~siNC~nfHu~il3~~fh~+n4aa.l~Fr~,f.Mim~tip~f4.rYnj~mrRt[4pMrimM i U~tc: l7~Rli I..i& Indmuw ~ Hcsry Enduatnd J Il ~k,4 ~ ? MIfCS hr4X*U Simx 44th A4t W4W 8ar1cs . . . P' CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 20, 2005 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing 0 information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legisla#ion AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Draft Scope of Work for Street Master Plan GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adopted the drafting of a well-defined Street Master Plan, with funding options, as a principal 2006 budget goal. BACKGROUND: Council has expressed their desire to develop a well-defined Street Master Plan, with funding options, that identifies the current condition of the city streets and recommends appropriate improvements and maintenance that preserve the value and structural integrity of the local transportation system. Staff has developed the attached draft scope of work for a consultant to assist with this effort. The scope is divided into two phases. Phase one is the development of pavement management system that would evaluate the current conditions of the city streets and what steps are needed to maintain them at their current level. Phase two is to assist in the development of a Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan inc4rporating the results of phase one and the other transportation needs of the.city. OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS: Phase 1-$275,000 for pavement management system, Phase 2-$150,000 street funds for development of Six Year TIP STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten, Public Works Director, Steve Worley, Senior Engineer ATTACHMENTS Draft Scope of Work ~~'('QPE OF SEfZV1CES: The City anlicipates that the scope of work to be provided by the Consultant will ..1~slude, but not limited to,l,he following activities: I'hase 1 - Favement• Management Task l -Neecis Asscssment: Conduci a needs tissessment to detennine the <<iability nf developing a pavement managemcnt sysCem (T'iV1S) for the City. Tnterviews/meerings will be conducted with key individuals from the City staff, i.ncluding the 1'ublic Works T)irector, engineering staff, maintenance pcrsonnel, and other staff that will be involved in the future use of notenlial pavement management data and/or outputs. The purpose of the intervicws is to tletermine the types of available pavement management informstion, current program budgets, current stsffing levels of 1'ublic Works personne•1, fmd any other information necessary for the consultant to perform the assessment. Upon completing the inCerviews, the consultant shall evaluace the benefits to the City from the creation of a pavement management system. A report shall be prepared to present the consultvlt's findings. This rcporl: shall clearly detail the rea.sons and benefts of implementing the system. The report: shall also identify the impacts to City infrastrucCtire and budgets if the pavemcnt management system is not implcmcnted. Taslt 2- T.riventory llata Collection: This task involvES collecting iiiventary infonnaCion thal will be used to establish the pavement management database. 1t includes the collection of existing inforr»ation on the roads a.nd streets that will be includeci in the implementation area. The types of data that will be collected arc expeeted tn include the followina items, iC a minimum: • Iacation information (refcrencing with `from' and `ta' characteristics) • Dimensions (len,gth, width, area) • Surface type • Last construCCibn date ~~--J • G1S identifiers Some existing intoi7nation is available tlirough die cureent Ciry ancf County records (includinp the Centerline PMS soflware infonnation generated by Spokane County). Thc accuraey and thoroughness of the information tnay neecl to be verified. This will bc completeti in cnnjunction with Task.4 Couclition Assessment. 'I:~sk 3-\7ehvork nefinition: The pavement network shall be divicled into facilities and sections. The ' subdivision of facilities into sections is one of the most important tasks eondueced during the implernentation of a PMS. Gurrent philosophy suggests looking at using a block-by-bloak approach For dividing pavement facilitics inco sections widi intersections included in the block section. Multilane streets may be divicted by cli.rection in addition tu block-by-block segments. Management sections can be aggregated inta more applicable project len?ths manually when developing fiiial pavement maintenance and rehahilitation project lengths. The naming and classifieation of the faeilities and sections needs t:o be cu-efully undertaken to ensure consistency on a cifywide basis. Appropriate naming ancl eIt1551f1Cah011 SI1flII f3C1IIt3iC t}1C <<ccess of daui and allow the ea:sy incorporation of ncw secCions into the pavement management clatabase i.n the future as needed. 7'ask 4- ConcliCiun Assessmcnt: Consultant shall prapnse and implement a survey prncedure to assess the conditiAn of City streets in accordance «<ith the current Pavement Stv fnce Cotrditiorr TieldRating Mantral used by the Northwest .Pavemenl Management Association. Th.is will be done for die results to bE comparable to data previously obtaincd by Spokale County. Only pavement c:ondition will be assessecl in the survey; not the condition of cui•b and gutter or side«<alks. Sections oii unclivided raads will be full- width scetions. In other ~words, assume that each seetinn (block or intersection) will be defined as a section that spans the length and width of the block (boih directions of travel) on undivided roads. Sections on multilane streets may be divide.d by direction in addicion to black-by-block segtnents. Pavement condition surveys will be conducted for each section talcing into account the condition of the road in each direction of travel. , \ Task 5- l)atabasc llevelopmeni: Upon completion of the previous tasks, a pavement management database shall be developed using the iJiventory and condition information collected. [f available, construction history will also be incorporated into the databasc development. Task 6- Sofhvare Fvaluatioo and Devclopment: Consultant wil] evaluate available public domain and propriet,ary soffivare for use in developmcnt of the pavement managemcnt system. The consultant Nvill recommend a software package that will meet the needs of the City as determined iri Task 1-Necds Assessment. The consultanl' shall procure the softtivare for the City after discussions with key staf£ This task shall also include customization of the selected pavement management softivare to include the development ot pavement dete•rioration models to predict the performance of the pavement nehvork in the future, the idencification of treatment rules co dctermine when certnin maintenance and rehabilitation treatments are viable, ancf the establishment of treatment costs so that bu(lgets c1n be developed. Task 7- Sir-Year Pavement Niansgement Plaii with iZeports and Maps:' The information contained in the pavement miinagcrTient databasc and the models developed in the previpus tiisk shall be used to prioritize the mai.ntennnce and rehabilitation neecls of the City undcr realistic constraints such as budget li►nits. The fmal product oPthis task shall include a multi-year pavement mainlenance and rehabilitation plan that is developed based on the parameters established in the pavement rnanagement system. Results of the analysis will be presented to City staff in the fonn nf a report, which also provides the related details of the imple►nentation and color-codeci GiS maps that show the proposetl locations of work throu,ghqut the City. 1'iisk 8- Systcm Maintensnce Evaluation: 'I"he consultant shall develop a plan for maintaining the Pavement Managernent system. The plan shall identify die personncl and costs associated with mainfaining the system by: 1) consultant contract and, as an alternative, by 2) in-house City personnel. 'fhe plan shall idencify the necessary FTF.s, equipment, and supplies to keep the program viable. A brief report sliall be prepared and submiCtcd detailing the fndings of this utsk. Task 9 - City Cuuncil Fresentation: The consulttint shall present their .findings at one (1) City Council meetin;. The presenlation shall cover the results of the needs assessment, the creation of the PMS, and future staffing and budgets required fqr the system to Ue viable. ' Task 10 -'1'rsinine and System Instsllation: Fpllo,,ving the complction of 1'asks ] througlt 9, the specific pavement manageinent software program shall bc installed nn the necessary computcrs at the Cicy.. Four (4) days oPt:raining will be provided to City staff who will be worl:ing with the pavement management: software. "1'he training will i.nclude an introduction to the general coneepts of pavement management along wikli specific instruction relating to the use of the selected pavement mananement softwarc. The training will include lechue, cliscussion, ancl hands-on use of the software. The consuliant shall also provide the Cit}, with a users manual and all necessary documentation for staff co consult during the use of the PViS: Phasc 2 - Transportittiun Planniny, Task .l. - Review ancl .F,valuation: The consultant shall review and evaluatc the city's current tnethods for developing the annual $ix Year Transportation Improvement Arogram (TIP). `I°his shall iriclude a review Qf the available data used to develop the TIP and the manner is whicli the dattt is manaoed. °I'he purpose. of this evaluation is to identif}, ways to improve the methods used and improve the collection, storage, ancl evaluation of data necessary to support the development of'the annual TIl' project priority , list. Interviewslmeetings will be conducted with kcy individuals from eity staft, ineludicig the F'ublic Works Director, engineering staff, maintenance personnel, iulcl other staff that will be involved in the future development of the annual TTl'. The intcrviews will help determine the types of available information, how this data is cui-i•ently stored, retrieved and used, current staffing levels of E'ublie 1Vorks persoiinel, and any other information necessary for the consultant to perform the assessment. A renort shall be prepared to present the consultant's findings. This repore shall clearly indiaate if t:he current available data is adequate for devclopment of the TIP and to support grart apNlications. 'fhe report shall alsq identi~v iniprovements nceded, if any, in tlie methods or data used to support the developinent of the amiual TIP. Thc repart shall also identify on-goi.nb staffing levels, resourees, and budget lo maintain the development oFdie TI:P each year. Task 2-Six-Year TIP Projeet i,ist: The consultant shall assist city staff in the development of the 2007-2012 Six Year Transportation Improvemcnt Pragram ('I'IP) using data identified in 'I"ask 1. This shall include, but not be limited to, review of I) volumc/capaciCy ratins based on Spokane region<<I traffic models, 2) number, location, and type of collisions/injurieslfatalities, and 3) cxis[ing and forecast intersection levels ofservice. Coordination wit:h other types of information will be required including: 1) existing pavement conditions, 2) inereased areas of'development and re-developrneiit wit:hin the city and in areas adjacent to the eity, 3) adjacent jurisdiction streel; projects tiiat cross ciry bounda.ries, 4) proposed street maintenance accivities, and S) full width ptiving projects associated with Spokane County's SepGie Tank Elimination Program. The consulCanl sliall develoN and use a type of ranl:ing system that will utilize the available data to identify and support a prioritized TTf' project list. Thc project list shall be divided into logical categories. Example categories include, but are not IimiCed to, Atterials, Safety, Traffc Control, Sidewalks/['rails, and T'1'S. . Tasl: 3- Sir Year TII' Cost Fstimates: Once apreliminary project list is developcd, the consultant shall prepare planning-level cost estimates for each project. The planning-level cost estimates shall includc 1) a description of the proposed improvements, includinc number of proposed lanes, intersection improvements, pedestrian/bic.ycle improvements, AIaA requirements, drainagc facilities, etc., 2) maps that define thc nroposed project limits, 3) est:imated quantities of propose(i bid items includiiig unit prices based on i-ecent Spekane area bid tabs, 4) right-nf-way acquisition costs. ~l1 Task 4- Six Year T17' Funding Proposals: The consultairt shsll revicw the project selection crixeria of the local, st:ate, tuid federal granC programs available and shall identify a grant funding program (or combinatiun of grttnt programs) for each project on the TIP project lisC. Grant progi-ams shall include, but not bc limiled to; the follpwing: • WA State Transportation Imprevement [ioard (TIB) ■ CArridor CUmpletion Liitiativc (CCl) • iJrban Arterial Prograni ([JA]?, previously ATP) • Urbvi Corridor Program (UCP; previously TPP) • Side-,valk Prqgram (SP, previously PSM:P) • Preieht Iviobility/5trategic Investment F3o<<rd (FMSIB) • Federal Aid Program • Bridgc (}3R) • Stuface Transportation Prograni (STP) • Congest:inn ManagemenUAir Quality Funds (CMAQ) ■ 1"ransportation rnhancement Program ■ Emergency Relief - • Intersection and Corridor Safety • WSDOT • Safe lZoutes to School Prograun ■ Peclestriiin and Bicycle Safety Program ■ Regional Mobility Grant Program • Spokane TransiC Auchnrity (STA) ■ Bus related sh-eet improvements • Conununiry Development E3lock Grants (CDI3G) • Low-Maderate Income area imprnvements 0 Wastiington Utilities and Transportation Commission (NN'UTC) • Grade Crossing Protective Fund ~ ,'1'he eonsultarnt shall also iclentify potenCial funding parhlers sueh a,s adjacent jurisdictions and/or priwate developers. Task 5- Six Year T1P iZcport - Tn the past cily sCaff has used bnt;h a spreadsheet format and a database format (inlieritecl from Spokane County) to present previous TTPs to Counci.l For approval. 1'he consultant shijll 1'F.VIClV these h;ro methods a.nd recommend or develop a prefcrred method (database, spreadsheee, or other method) for easily ereatiiig, editin& and kracking projects and project stahis in the TTP. The'I'lE' shall consist a Iist of prioritized projeets divide_d into catcgories and brokcn down by phase (PF, RW, and CN), by year, b}' fundina source, ete. The TIP projects list nceds to inclucle all necessary infermation for inelusion into the StaCe Transportation Improvement Frogriim (STTP) soffivare. Task fi - Database Development: After reviewing the eity's data upon whieh tlae prioritized TIP prqject list is developed, the consultant shall review databases or other methods of data storage used by other Washington jurisdietions, including Spokane Caunty, and devclop a recommendaxion on how the city's data could be better managed. The consultant shall then develop a database, a series nf dacabases, or odier methods lhat will aUow city staff to better manage t:he information ner.essary for the evaluation and prioritization of transportalion projects. This will include the management of h-ansportation network volume/capaeity ratios, intersECtiqn ]evels of service, number and types of collisions/injuries/fatalities, recent local bid results for unit price estimating, and other t:ypes of informatinn icientified in Taslc 1. The recommendetl data mana-ement tool could be a t:hird-party software, a modification of another jurisdiction's methods, or the development of itn entirely neNv method. Once a method is selected, dhe consuhimt shal I develop that method using tlie city's available data and train eity staff on its use. T9sk 7- Grant rlpplications: Tt is snticipated that lhe Spokane Regional Transportntion Council will . issue a Call for Projects for the'07-'09 biennium as a result of the reccntly passed federjl t.ranspoi-tation ~ bill. lt is also anticipated that the Transportation Improvcment Board (T[B) grant applications for the - 2008 canshvction season will also be due at the end of Aiigust 2006. Upon adoption by Council of the Six Year TII', the consultant shall assist city staff prepare these, and other, grant applications. Grant applicaiions va.ry but the genera.l type Uf information and rescarch required ineludes, but is not limited to: existing structural pavemenl eAndition, existing and proposed levels of service (LOS), existinD and proposed trafFc volumes, sysCem eontinuity, project fundin;, alternative mode aceessibility, transportatinn eoncurrency, economic growth and development, urbzui zccident analysislaiinaat benefit, publir; support/participation, environmental enhancements/historical preservation, fi•eiglit mobility, GeV1A infornlationlsupport, etc. Task 8- Resources fZeport: After completina tasks 1 dlrough 7, the consultant shall evaluate, identify, and make reeommendations for t:hc on-going staff.ng Icvels, resources, anc1 budget necessa.ry to maintain the development of the TTP each year. The results of tliis evaluation shall be presencecl in a report. '1'his report shall clearly detail the reasons and benefifs of the recommendat.ions. Phasc 3- Street Mastcr Plsin Renort The Consultznt: shall prepare a final Street Master Plan report that summarizes the efforts a.ncl eonclusions deve(oped under Phases 1 and 2. T'he report shall include an overall summary of the existing conditions of the cily's street network, the proposed sceps to maintain the existing condiYion levels, and recomrnendations on budgets and stitffng lcvels to meet the proposed recommendatioil s. • ~ ~ CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 20, 2005 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ cansent ❑ old business El new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information QC admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE : REPORT ON 2006 STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTS GOVERNING LEGISLATION: City Agreement No. C03-33 - Interlocal Agreement with Spokane County Regarding Road Maintenance and City Agreement No. C03-24 with Washington State Department of Transportation Regarding Road Maintenance PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Agreement C03-33 approved April 22, 2003; Agreement C03-24 approved March 28, 2003 BACKGROUND: Staff report discusses the status of the street maintenance contracts. Primary focus is.on the contract with Spokane County. Significant oRerational changes have occurred in the past year that requires the City to investigate alternative providers for services beginning in 2006. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Council to provide direction to staff regarding the transitioning of certain street maintenance activities from Spokane County. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: To be determined STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten, AIA, and John Hohman, P.E. ' ATTACHMENTS: 2006 Street Maintenance PowerPoint ~ . ALllV11Y 4C1/~11Y IDifO0KIN4GT :lCt .UOC[IiYICq.WiY lOOICRYA~PItlAtr :LM 2M7CIfKCOUNT' .7:JCIlY1PM'AIL~ .9C1 C6CI7Y1WUNIT SLLtSGf~YIPflI/. CQC[ CEBCRIPfCV AVAUAT AC77IIiY COY4IUL'tAVOUMT C0'Ii£~LT/YCI:M JUC[M1Y CONiPALTW41.".Y7 [GJ/1VGiFH01D.VI IIC7PIILY Cb:t]R/t'IlUItlU~T OOIfTA4CiAVY.~ / ~{~.~~S:SCl`~Ci:; iA'.,..: ~..dG...ll"F5~ +-:.'~~?':9.t.~ry1}; ~~r•.- t.7 •YAh:. 2Mn aW cmadvro u m C) ul7Gn(nCIt scaim C' tIJ.Eds.q t'~x~+ar.ru sr,aoaw G, 17B.h0M CU sMa;ic C' • fn7T.41 .+1a'.ae3wrkcsv+e.oe.aw sma7ao0 Gt L~1.~7xm Gt w.sfm C' 4fl2t:.ti 'G.w.tvYtfbaebs sisxwm Cit 110319M d1 Si7i~tm CI 118225.6t P.W.Ov s1331mPO ' 9C'dJ.'A svxam wm s~r, Lcs Ci s~ea139.s~ n4u+rvnv.rme.p.xn s smao Cari•crcam cau. >22At~u tcartl• s24 aa7: un ~ sd.- a~a asw+wf iYrnl a i1.:hcs sm5 SO :l 1Court $4 a7.a2 Sb m G. Cit N7Gra co Du Crc\ W! fi 4.'Q:Q COGlk'f il 7Y.pq Gflfl:C' ftJ7 W Cpw{' SI49.111636 TSIS dioD R A fPM 'SSW BYtb Pat:h . tt *=M b.-RIR L~R CI tW 1]y'iQ~sriOrPaG4ao tl 'A ('iS {I.MDA) Col 7SAm GI' S9Pl1P_2 7+13 >oef, si oo CS 1i p CI! si 11nm Cf li.:lif.a x.n .i_axem s1Y.Qro CA. sima.m ia,oO C7 st.~m..o Ck 11JMW 35tt ' R 'Tr-s IY.lXQLO 22Yf1?y SIGE1200 W Cl1 Si14aII72 C.S' C.EiNM 2!13 & R' ran tSt00.(O CAUlM SSb).O3 i]ao Clt S5730.2.1 cay fqm4 10 2cro n.wo m cty 51 Ch si affi.o C~ 51 mma.-O zmi u,e. $i.cmm ce 1 sipom clri si.iMao icire f+,n.m Mm V~ 15mm CRf 1 ss-oo CI • 0B:.B7 C7t tzesat 1fi60..~s+1Yar- 1127(in m CR st ca7o Ut 371707.92 cly. {I,=m t9~9 RwF f2rmm CIN f lba:o GI f.2P1t.90 C7v ~a 29.7 wrti+,rr.~mn~o l!"Amr, CI 4mM GI 1r19636 CIlV sqm4,10 268t ' N f1C.'+.n10a; COUrti itCLiN.CQ (:OURh f111.➢19A7 Coullf t1Bt225.q - 1082 atMlmuD Ccun 3U!.f70.(0 Cafnd• s= ma.x County i27p,a12:,.5 .'^Bd7 t724.4DJm C~ur i237 .CO Cart s7xjt3!,B- Ccunt tM.hif.BB aas.la~«.rt.+~-sa.~.+cti V.+o?oo cccr Kuaco cosr ;sam coutuy, mm.ie saezra'.co r.50.co smmom ar uti:.m,oo cin 61aaaua7 an, w: ao corr ax.cM ro tr vs7asw at sn0,74147 xsn:410~- ec'rr Wm ce usoo,ro at H. s7 7711 hynaiu. mamao Gt ic. czm Ct t:1,460.72 C.t[z- Wf 7l12 6~s~~C ''i'whlrni+~ LlSi'lU.]0 ('.OCtR' 51742130 Coulft H t12$ Ca2Y.' N2,5.727 n13 W..eCan,"n tz+wum CS• MA2440 Ch Snar u CAv 04an,3 :fi]l Ws~fCp46Pe s eA00 CC tS,eX,W Ch =730 70 G sscl-.te 7 114 N4C Cp~ }(i~t 90Q00 &'S},47{p7 C~1V Y1110 CO'. H`~9 311 15 N'wd Cb46Ci~n (M ~ Ss ifIQ611 C. ~ {S,tre.W CI j 773 n Cf. L_ l10 7lm : 171D0.00 C, 17.530R0 C" SlaR.s7 GR. i ~xzt T)SO tcr Pk+aa x1W.00 City la.7090 dt s=.ia Cq 77YG thw fk:• Mr st(qD.M CM t2t740o Gt ' szx;iv Cfh s ffim 2799law0mcr+ ti.(MM Ci{e i1010 :0 G1 C' siIoc.02 21BOQ-•CWoa t1(022c CIty lnmm Gt fi.in.ao Cif tt.luto2 a[R p-- %v yAtmae C sa:mm Gt uel+_.:6 Cfl iiW216 WLinw I+n~a~ Coun ~:QCVj.W CarS tem, m COum sId~.a :MUO.er C.be CoUrtt S73Aro,oo sa,sava Ccunty 12!.p)].00 i~nrin+IRa~awh.avc. 1 ctl.M7JD0 qAf1,e77J2 fsta,tl6w 310a!~7.sa sl.Yi~.ZZ1.zD U~7ttibl t1.~37,'., . y+~,,..t'... - . . . _',...iti•~k'S~crnYw:y.n , ....e'h.~.c ~._ri . ~..-_<:d--.... •~e~-. . i. . . , . . . aria u~oe: sama.ao Gaum i74 xim ..Ct~u. sr_Aixu qty i~obn ors.ekene fga.394 m Gi vb.107.24 C stra.9G?R Gt s ion?.m _WMJC:JY~IRwi, STS7A0 ('.CUN f l14 CAJfITf t•'27.00 tiG1RQ7 VEC ~ CMSeWt HA:JAO Counr 54em75 Cfl!!fC( ts.i!J.il Gf L•~16 Olll 9-l~M1YiI1MWKe SI4:167 CM:N• 3 LQ7E CAUf11M {S~i13 .17 Cz i•:96L7 DYl7 Cuq(hIWAINV,CQ-t lt6MS.CO Gt C j 71Am CC 77[41.:s O7 GwMNaar i4.Y:l.W CarN KLa0.7N county iw+0317 cauffty se~..,mN.r~ro.soW swA».eo 147,62k=n &cm.306.u I ssa~ms~ ~su.~~~es ta.a.~~ ssa,'ese~ .~LL.1~ IrIIIqNMNNPl:i.4Clhllb~..•;. ••'S.L ';~`f~~'~SA',~.~-:'i. - ~ i'f . ~ i n ne`ervrc. ~ yp4ro:o ' Csrrff ' tTi(9r00 Coun! 577.ir7.~u Count iMrz,t 21512 rws. :a4~4mm smm4 m Cr,uni r ~aa C,aum s~r.~co X.3 ru c• xmm COUrft wim.m Cnunt• ~m~,zi Caunt sici6~5e 19" Tu CN.s i m.r~. c• etq (+l C.munN s~ afe.uc Ccunt $x ma6 Cunly~ sR.821.12 29081Y N~aTCb~ 11,5DO.p1 Caut11Y SL3JCA? CCl'R2 11.893A7 CUUR2 fL7B952 7rm 6 {qnm COUtrt 157J.pp C*atf 11911,40 CaUnt• 1(A;Ft 2X4~ l a carrn Coun Ca,r CcurS :uu r~f c' CounN Carfi Gcur.f 7OM [Avf k~ L COUII}V COY.C CWA(' 4A1\bd~an COUII CG1Y CpyI1(' ~B]Kd1~+1N ' COUfi Cd (,'a,fl(' s~,~►~.nn .Sii+.► Cou~il Cc Tra".3[Ya'n~z~raieW Il14,60]A] 1419 :6.00 yd3M4d4 •.i.fuauiiclGaW~N'1rYflaVJtY0a4lh:1~, :'..".r'-,., ...:._y. . - _.a-. - . . . . . . - ~ ~ :Ra]l~ T.IkY SJ mIAD 47A51177IQ f9Is-4Q.OC j:11:3T00 i174 721.."D :7]61~01 SIa:~.IN(: 2'cvn~sV~i6ert. TM/;s SIQ¢1lA] f47W iD Slm .i, S• ~L2]I Sti a18.54 S•~]~.10 tlm.yIS.@ T.O. TnSfe~e.t~.x•fall.fA')OD S479U7&jp (lmNSryj .r~~ow~.aa tPfi fM.O7JiN 3-' L~.00 i37RClO.tL I~i~:LYJ w .tiMC.m1.~Mtiaa ~ {725.6JS,G] Si v1t21 ! !7l.Tt {7a.9Y.lp] ' fs421N,17 627S,R2~.U I:SJ.:J:07 ~ 1:fA1R9611 fLiIfOT1U~ SI,~lI.tTtai 177{.(I7.7f I7,Hki10i1 t1.K3~i)7A~ fi,1!l.T71.1) TOi0.L Gf1Y UUUGET 13.157.322.OD 53,427,143h2 S3,609,903.13 S3,625,573.66 'L~1 +b ~nra+awNmm tsth mRI u M,asc.r s,e aav;. R:r.r. ~a.c:a • \1 . ~ 2006 Street • • • Maintenance December 20, 2005 Neil Kersten, Public Works Director John Hohman, Senior Engineer Tim Klein, Maintenance . Superintendent ~ 20MJ SUect Murticnmce ~ . • ~ ~ Program Attributes o In 2006 Council's #1 goal is development of a Street ~ Master Plan that will include providing the maintenance required to preserve the City's streets. o High visibility - citizens can directJy see their money at work o Potential to make a real difference in the lives of our residents - i.e. paving a gravel street, fixing a recurrent drainage problem, keeping weed growth under control, fixing a problem the right way for a long term solution ' o Sets a tone for the community - well maintained City infrastructure helps foster community pride and encourages new residential and business opportunities . p aaac saod n+simovnco ~ 1 • ~ ~ Background o All street maintenance performed under contract by Spokane County and WSDOT o WSDOT responsible for SR 290 Trent and SR 27 Pines o Spokane County responsible for all other arterials and local access streets 3 2C08 ".,Ctrsd Kalucnenoc i • ~ ~ Background o Contracts cover: • Street activities such as snow plowing, street sweeping, and pavement repairs • Stormwater activities which includes drywell and culvert cleanout and. . repairs . • Traffic maintenance which includes signals, signs, and striping 4 2:.tQ S.mct `lalztenance ~ I~. J • ~ ~ Examples of Operations = ` I ,e ' ~l ~ ~f"„~~.~1Y ' f il _C ~~i:": ~3+_..~' .rh ~ 3'C . c . - . - .r ; r s F'?J •i . • 00 WSDOT Contract . o Contract executed in 2003; automatically renews each year o Contract functions well but is limited in scope: only Trent and SR 27 o State continues to provide a high level of service for street maintenance and traffic operations 6 2006 8tlCCt NaLYCnnllCO • I t % 3 ~ ~ • ~ ~ County Contract o County contract executed in 2003, covered 2004 and automatically extended for 2005 o City reimburses County for actual costs plus a. 24% overhead/management charge 0 2004 County contract amount was $3,113,268; actual billed $2,292,000 0 2005 County contract amount $3,187,322; through November, billing is $2,548,053 7 2oD3 slmet A7tlmsrancs ~ • 00 Contract Analysis o$3+Million annual budget is appropriate given the needs of the street system o County has not billed entire budget due to: •Light winter weather over the past rivo years • Lack of permanent staff for shouldering and asphalt patching - instead relying on Seasonal or Temporary workers • CiCy is second priority - crews typically complete County work first; Example: Pavement Removal and Replacement • Heavy County workload; Example: County performs striping work for themselves, MIIINJOOC{, Liberty Lake , and Spokane Valley with only one striping machine • County has not designated a City specific cre%v or foreman and has not been willing to add permanent staff • g 2Q09 Sva~ Mentenmce s 4 ~ ~ . • ~ ~ Contract Analysis o Most difficulties involve non-winter activities - shouldering, sweeping, pavement removal and replacement, weed control o Winter operations woric better; crews are available for 24 hour coverage and have kept our streets in good condition o County operations are focusing on upgrades and paving of rural County roads g ^.0[8 ~oet rtattenan:c l ~ Examples of Maintenance Needs . ~ •Y j ~ Y . ~ WFwi"' 1 E v1 b ' 1 ~r . 2G00 slrect Alofnt~vnCO ' 10 I 5 • ~ ~ Contract Analysis o Levels of service must be defined and directed by the City . • Current contract maintains pre- incorporation levels of service, but does not clearly define the service level • City staff is not always able to obtain adequate service for our citizens. Example: some work requests such as shoulder repair are never performed • City work will always be a lesser priority j ~ 2009 stmn Ka1:Senonce \ i Overall Contract Assessment o County is not set up to be a contractor and does not wish to adapt its operations . to be a contractor for the long term o County has stated that they do not need our work; will help out where needed but prefer that we begin transitioning away from their services as outlined in the following draft plan 12 2JC6 3tOC! IAlflflflqMO . r I 6 • ~ • Contract Options Phase out all services in the County contract except traffic/signal work • Phase out most services in 3-years • Phase out snow removal over a 5-year period • Maintain the County for traffic & signal wo rk -13 2006 5tmci NNnlennto \ %1 • ~ ~ Draft Plan - o City and County staff have developed the. following short term plan 0 2006 activities transitioning to the City • Landscaping and weed control - must transition this activity due to the termination of City work within County's contract with service provider and lack of County personnel (only 1.0 FTE) • Street Sweeping • Drywell cleanout . Grading and shouldering . Options fior pothole repair, pavement replacement, and durable long-term striping depending on City stafPs ability to prepare bid documents and manage contracts 14 20:6 shet MnYtanRxe ` r • 7 ; i • ~ ~ Draft Plan . 0 2007 activities transitioning to the City • Adds all non-winter asphalt repairs (potholes and pavement replacement) • Start to develop options for winter maintenance 2000 Slrecl Mtlm:non:c • • • ~ Draft Plan 0 2008 activities transitioning to the City . All activities except trafficlsignal work, and snow removal are in-house or contracted. 0 2009-2010 • Phase out snow removal by the end of 2010 • County continues with traffic/signal work • 8 i . u • ~ • Draft Plan o Management responsibilities revert from County to City on private contracts or in-house work o The impact to City staffing levels will be evaluated and incorporated into the analysis of . service options - o County currently charges a 24% overhead on . all woric o Part of the overhead expense can be shifted to City management and the remainder will be rolled back into services 17 zcoe:~2m..wsxo~o ~ 1. . . ~ _J• • • Options to investigate o Tull contract services o Full in-house services o Combination of in-house and contracts o Shared facility and equipment use with County for snow operations - County has extra graders during the winter that could be rented by the City o Other 18 2606 Stteet 6•alttxnan_c ~ . . ~ 9 \ • ~ ~ Questions and- Comments? . - , % • ~ ~'j. ~'h-}'. .'.lY . . . . - Y . ' :eS~+. . ' : : ! ' ~ Y. . 1t . . u~~ . • , 1 1 1 ~ ft~ 20:8 f•Lpq flahlcNn00 i 10 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY \`--J - - Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 12-20-05 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Service Recognition GOVERNING LEGISLATION: . PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: Time will be set aside for service recognition. OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: ATTACHMENTS J L - DRAk'T ~ ADV.AIVCE AGEIVnA For Planning Discussion 1'urposes Only as of Decemher 15, 2005 9:00 a.m. Ylease note this is aNvork in progress; items are tentative To: Counci! & Staff From: Cify Manager . Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings • December 27,2005, Ni► Meeting .ianuary 3, 2006, StuclY Sessioo. 6:00 p.m. [due date Thursday, Decemher 221 l.Election of Council Officers - Chris Bainbridge 15 minutes) 2~(:ouncil C~ittee Appointme[tta~_: Nla}or< . • ' , ; 5 iTiut:es • 3. rltiministrative Rcport: flnnual Accomplishments Report-vina I'Zegor, et al ~-(45 minutes) 4. Studeiit Acivisory Committce Recommendation Regarding Funding to Youth Outside Agencies - . Councilmember L7eVleming - (10 minutes) 5. \tational Incident Ntanagement System Training (NI (viS) - Cal Walker (45 minutes) 6. Off=Roac1 Vehicle Use - Cary Driskell (20 m.inutes) 7. Legistative Issues - Vlayor/Deputy Mayor (I S minutes) TQTAL MIiYUTES: 165 minutes January 1.0, 2006, Reaular Meeting, 6:00 p.m. [due date Thursday, Deceinber 291 1. Consent A.genda: M.iriutes, Claims, Payroll 2. Proposed Fee Resolution Amendmenl-Ken 7'hompson [10 rninutes] 3. Motion Consideration: Adoption of Parks & Recreation Masker Plan - Vlike .Tacl:son [20 minutes] 4. tAclministrativc Report: a. Draft lbfaintenance Contract-\Teil Kersten [20 minute.s] 6. lnforrnation On.lv: a. CTK-1 Interitn Zoning (expires 03-06-06) - M. arina Sukup . b. hIelmet Use Education - Chris 13ainbridge c;. Enforceincnt Process - Mike Connelly d. Hearing Examiner Ordinance Amendment - Cary Driskell/imil:e Counelly e. Plastic Injecliou vlolding - Mari.na Sukup DISCUSSiON: CoLmci) Deliberation: Draft Cvmprehet7srve Pluri: Cand Uce, IJtilities, rnad/or Natur•al Errvirorr»rent C100 minutes] - [cstimated mecting: 1.60 minutcs*] Januxrv 17, 2006, S[udY Sessipn, 6:00 p.m. [due date Thiirsday, .Tanuaiy SJ Cnuncil Ueliberat:ion: Draft Comp Plan: Land Usc, Utilities and/orNatural Environment (150 minutes) TOTAL rTIlNUTES: lSll minutes Thurstlav, Januarv 19, 2006, Special meeting-6-9 p.m. Cnuncil Chumbcrs , Cnuncil Deliberation: Draft Comp Plan: lJtilities and/or Natural Environment (150 minutes) .r7F 'VTr~TIVE:119'ondav; J'Anuaiy 23;:.2006.::Gr.ntral Vallsy School _Di'strx, et. al: Juint A•i:ee2'-- Capital Facilifies Draft Attvtmcc Agenda 1 211 5/2 0 0 5 8:52 A, Page 1 of 3 ! • ,Tanuary 24,2006, Rcgiil.ir MeetiuQ, 6:00 n.rn. (due clate Thursday, January 121 1. FUBLIC Ff.Ee1.RING: Interim Zoning U1.14. -1'Iarina Sukuh [20 minutes] _ 2. PLIl3LIC HE r1YtCNG: Coinprehensive Plan [45 minutes] 3. Consent Age»ds: Miniites, Claims, Payroll 4. First Reading Proposed (5rdinanee Amending Aviation Axea- Marina Silk-up C15 minutes] 5. rirst Keading: Proposed Ordinance Interim Zoning (expires 03-06-06) -Marina Sukup [10 minutes] 6. Aclministrstive Keport: a. Spokane Co. Libraiy 17istrict Update on New T ibrary 1'rocess - Niike Wirt [20 minutes] b. I,and Quantify Analysis - Vlv-ina SukuP/Greg McCormick [20 minutes] c. Communicatian Grant Update - Cal Walker [15 minutes] r_r,,._..Y.~,F-:.r._--~--~--~ , 7 Lfl:irfi~:Perinits:~.G''ounc~I.etiGer~ltion: T)'raft•~oinp l'lan: LTt;ilities andfoi Nat`ural E'n~~iron en 8. Infonnatian O►ily: a. Depitrtmental Vlonthly Report,c [cstimated meeting: 145 minutes*] January 31. 2006, Studv Session, 6:00 mm. [due date T1iursday, Jitouary 191 Council Deliberation: Draft Comp 1'lan: UGilitics and/or Natur3l Enviranment (150 minutes) `l'hursday, Fcbrusirv 2, 2006, 6-9 p.m. Council Chambers, Special Nlcedng Council Delibcration: 17raft Comp Plan: Utilities andlor Natural Environinent (150 minutes) ~ k'ebruary 7, 2006. Study Session, 6:00 p.m. [due date Thursday, January 261 Council Deliberation: Draft Comp Plan: Utilities and/orNatural rnvironment (150 minutes) Saturdav. February 11, 2006, Council/Staff VVintcr Retre.at; [due datc Thur, Jun 261 CenterPlace Cnnf. Rooin 7'ent.ucive rtgerida Iterns Inchude: February 14, 2006, Regiilar Mecting, 6:00 p.m. [due dstc Thursday, February 21 L Second Readin- Proposed Ordinance Amending Aviation Arca - Marina Sukup [10 minutes] 2. Seconc! Rcading Aroposed Orcli.nance UR-1 lnterim Zoning- Marina Sulcup [10 minutes] 3. Administrative Reports: a. Nlassage ParlorsBa[h Houses - Cal «TalkerlCary Driskell [20 minutes] lestimatecl meeting: minutes'`] Februarv 21, 2006, Sfuclv Session, 6:00 n.m. [ciue date Thursday, February 91 _ Council Deliberation: Draft Comp Plan: Utilities and/or Natura1 Environment (150 minutes) Draft Advance Agenda 12lI5l7-005 8:52 AIvf Page 2 of 3 `y . . Februarv 28,2006, Rcaular 1'[eeting, 6:00 n.m. [due aaYe Thurscisy, February 161 • , March 6,2006, Studv Session, 6:00 p.m. [clue date Thurs, Feb 23] Mvrch 14, 2006, Regular Meetine. 6:00 p.m. [due date Thurs, `Zarch 21 March 21, 2006, Studv Sessiun 6:00 p.m. [clue date Thurs, iN7arch 91 Mareh 28, 2006. Rcg ular Mceti ng, 6:00 n.in. [due date Thurs, March 16] April 4, 2006, Srudv Se.ssio», 6:00 n.m. [due date Thur, `Zarch 231 l April 11, 2006, Reaular Meeting, 6:00 p.m. [due datc Thar, MarcU 3111 OTFi:I:R PFNniNG AND/OR UPCd11'LLNG ISSI.TFS/11!fFFT]1iGS: Traffic tind Speed L•imits I7iscussion - Ncil Kersten Joint BoCC and City Council Meeting 2egarding Joinf Planning Ab*reement Pandem ic R.csponse Strategies - r ire District # L Chicf Mike Thompson Ordinance Fldopting Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 13us Benchcs 1'rism/1'lus/Padal (Farcel Data I ocator) System - Chris Berg Ha'r,arcl MiCination 1'lan - Marina Su}.-up Central Valley Schaol District Tmpact Fee Recluest CenterPlace Fiber vs. 'L 1 for Communications and Data - Mike Jackson Joint Mcctings: Sehool Districts; Board of CounCy Commissioners Panhandling - Cal Walker Second Readina Proposed Siclewalk Ordinance 04-012 -(first reading 02-24-04) Sewer Collection Systems -Neil Kersten Storage Tanh Ordinance - Tom Scholtens Street Paving Funding Option -?\Teil Kersten (Gary Schimmels) Definitions and schedules of pernlitted uses - Marina Sukup ~J SI:PA Mitigat.ion Strategies - Cary DriskeU/Greg McCormick/Neil Kersten Planncd Unit DevelopmenC (PUD) Policy Issues - Niarina SukuplNfike Connelly estirnated meeting tirnc does noe include time for public co►nmentsJ Dra(t Advanc;e Agenda 12/15/2005 8:52 AM Page 3 of 3