2005, 02-15 Study Session
~
A(;Lti'UA
('IT1' UF SY()KAhC %':11.LEY
CITY CUUVCIL WUltKSEIELT
st•unYsESStoN
Tucsda}•. Frbruan° 15, 211U5 6:00 p,m.
CiTY RALL AT i2F.DW40D PLAZA
11707 East Sprngce Avenae, First Flnar
(Pleu.ce '1'urn Off All F:lectroaic nc+-iccs Duriag thc Meedag)
DISCUSS101 [..F'.ADEK SL'E3JE(°I'I4C"I13`17Y GnAI.
! hinaRegor ( D.5 minutey) Authorizr thc Cih Mnnyger ta Negratiatc Building Mot.ion Ccsnsideration
Space ipublic comrnent)
2Smcvc «'orlcv (20 minutc.; ! PinrstMansfielcf Mitigation Agreements ti1otion Contiidcration
u Agreement with J. Gtant Person (pablic cammentl
b. Aumemait with Thomas !-inmilt.an (public comment)
(trgularStud}• Srssiua inuas (No 1'ublic C'omment):
J. Diannr Qunst, Willian "Lr.:k tipc-ikanc liousiagAutiz(irih- Prcscntalion
{1; minuics)
a. Ion Ctiasscn. Ruhin i'oth (ECX:) Tax increment i-1rwncing Prcscntatiori
Tom Recs (City of Spoknnc)
(20 minutcs)
Ninn Itc~;url:llus`.;an K.,u.lrll.u ( ablr l~ra»chitie 1"p:1ate 7i;cus}i~~nilnl~~rn~.iUc~n
(15 miitiutes)
6. Nlorgan Koudelj:a l'pciatt, 200; Cuntracts with Spakunr Count), Uiscussiaivlnfarmatian
~ 15 minuics)
- Jolm Hnlimun (20 mirtutes) Ymposed Stormwstet Urdinance Discussinn((nformacWn
8. Marina Sukup (1 D rninutcs) Nazard Mitig$tian Plan Discussinn!lnfarnmtien
'J ^1Arina Sukup'Car} t)ri1l,clf ('r~-Pv--c;j titrrrt Vac.ition i►i:fiiz;mcc Arnentlrnctit I>iS.:uS;:inn'Inforninti,m
I 10 min+Itr,.1
i ii Can L)ri.E;:ll (Ip ininutcs) Watcr Svlcty Itcbu(ntions Dt,ctissiotVIntormncion
11. Mnyor Wilhitc (5 minutex) Advancc Agrnctn Additions Uiscussicmflnfortnatien
12. Nina Rcgor (S tttinutrs) Council Check in piscussian/lnfurmalion
iI Nina Rcgor (5 minutes) Deputy CityManager Camments nfsc u,~sicm(Infrjrmatir„ti
Nafr: Eicrpt un iinted abare, ihere Nill tro no puhhr commtnts At ('oanctl5tad? Sessions. FtOwci er, C'ouncll 0w;;q, rrsrrvrs thr
ri„bt to requesi inforinatian from the public and stsif ns aQprapriate.
N: iT]C1: led~o~d~ul: plstwnK 1» nstrtf~l ttsc rck:lm~ ulw rcquirc s~+cc~tl msiFtsn~c lu accummcxfaic ph}vi:al. htarin~ or c,tbct impwrmCnls. rlaoe earttart
ih:: ~.'~n L-;~ tt i•NIr: i• ttfl': ns axm a~ ;^tcihlc :r Ihir nrrnrt_cr.:en;; mxy be m~~lc
~ CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: February 15, 2005 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent [K old business new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Authorize the City Manager to negotiate
building space
GOVERNIIdG LEGISLATION: N!A
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Administrative Report, February 8, 2005
BACKGROUND: The City's current building lease runs through February 2007. At the
February 8, 2005 Council meeting, City Manager Mercier explained the current lease
arrangement wifh WEB properties for our office space and of the additional space needs for
records storage and for more efficient housing of staff. It was Council consensus that staff bring
back a motion at the next meeting which would authorize the beginning of lease negotiations,
authorize an extended lease and pursue additional space in the building.
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to Authorize the City Manger or Designee to
negotiate lease terms and acquisition of additional space at Redwood Plaza
BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS: The City's current lease rate is $16.00 per square foot for
16,000 SF.
STAFF CONTACT: Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager
~ /
_ CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
,
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 02-08-05 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Motion Consideration: Pines/Mansfield Mitigation Agreements
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: -
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: At the February 8, 2005 Council meeting, Council passecl
a motioii tliai the City increase its participation in the "Mitigation Agreement, SR 27 (Pines Road)
Mansfield Road Construction Project" by up to $53,196, which may be reduced should Thomas Hamilton
and/or J. Grant Pe.rson f le with the City Clerk, their respectivc mitigation agreeme»ts by 4:30 p.m.
F-riday, Februtiry 11, 2005, the final submittal opportunity for tMcir participation in said mitigation
agreement.
BACKGROUND:
This item is rescrved on the agencla in anticipation of receipt of developer mitigation aareements ready for
presenk3Cinn to the City Council for motion considcracion.
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
a. I movc that the Council accept thc "Mitigation Agreemcnt, SR 27 (Pines Road) Mansfield
Road Construciion Projcct" between the City and.I. Grunt Person, dated
2005 in the aznount of and authorize the City Manager to eaecute said
agreemcnt.
b. I move that the Council accept dle "Mi[igation Agreemcnt, -SR 27 (Pines Road) Mansfield
Road Canstruction Project" between the City and 'Chomus Hami]ton; dated
. 2005 in the amount oi' $ , and authorize ttle City
Manager to execute said agreement.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
r-- ~ STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten
~
ATTACHMENTS
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 01-15-05 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Spokane Housing Authority
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND:
Spokane Housing Authority Chair William Zeck and Executive Director Dianne Quast will give a
presentation of their 2004 Annual Report to the Community.
~
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT:
ATTACHMENTS
\ i
Spokane a tr Authority
~
A New ~
Perspect'ive:,
Nartheast Washington Housir~~ Solutions
_ .~1
Am
AaIMll-0i Report to t~e Cornmur7ity
,1 r
' „P
~ .
+1~► , , ~
~ _ -
-
~
.
~
~ ~
Changing Per~~~~ives
- 0
0 nce again we are plcased to peesent ouK annuax roport aceaunting for
raur arograms arsd stewardsfllp i3t fimsoufcflS flWef the p3sC yQdf
'r'nia may notrre 5erme dsf#erenCe~ (ttsrri 2t}Ck3. Thr~+e are :im~ of
f~
ch ~~n~e the ~fir~rc~~b~e k~r~u:~ing indu5try and no less fcrr our orgartixaCi~an.
~ We felt r, oney frttif,ra to antraduce th,r.=-w char:Cp:~ wiih a new ~apr•i~- tirirJ new look
I .bJVlhgugh SFxrkane Ffousiriq Au"finrr,y r;,r,1:r,,,,c 1,0 hci Otyr i_p,U??ra?e narrie, ti+ue
tiwlD do tsusiness as Nor#hea st'Wa.shington Hou sing Solutians.
fni5 ~eprorP sRts rLt ~he rgai 5ucresse5 NEWN$ h,s: achikvx;a ,:)uL,"'r;e parT yedr
A huge roesge ot servaees naue been cteflvered, p roblerns zackled and policie5
rlev&oped and ioaomcic-d ty ~he orijaruization's s?aff and parkneT~. IE hai, b-eLNI a
:T1GfT1~f1t~LJ5 y~df in fT'~drly +~Y3}'S
Btit iN year ahrearJ wUl tre eueri m:lm CtiSlca' ft1f oUi Qrgr7n.i7atk9rt. Thi:S wIIA be ti1e
,td}n:y 2aaaa tiflmrriiS° yedf Wherk We deinoft;lJdT.e ih3i 1hem 3tle effiCieRI 4peFdt~'Jf5 dT1d 5efIoUS G}2FfofiA1-eC5
~
saonarr 9ulia Rnhrn,saanR A1„irpp~r Q~o~1 (Ex+exutuve [,~aCty is~ d~liuer a t'etter future for tl~+~ c~trn:munitie5 w~° Senre
t7Jrrcior), lefr! 5yr~~il (Vice ChaJrptnomil. )ar+LA I
9.uttnt, Rich Bnttiarn, 8idl 24tek {Charrpersonl In the #r)llo+in,,r.q page5 you well find dgi,-ils rt 5ignafictinT Vrides faTvwdrd san a
nLamber nf frrn^s, am~inq ti7ern, hnusing rerawad and xqo:rsitian, horrself zs
STRCNG vIE'4MS DPa =,555TfD HOUSaa~IS CtfTS ind vulnerdble pupulataori. fiousing, resowarcOUl fijntls distnburiorr, streamtined
NEmr-,-us PIJnit1r1'g b~ IIIl, [1iwrSf`ItiNi1t't~~ i oPgd#19Z3ilICAnal StfLJctY1`e and IP^haincPd FJfogTaRe saf4'lcE.+sj,
4-IG:4:ing tln'd UTE7an VICW4eki*pfiiert iF+ST Ss1trdde'3.
thrwoh ~~*0 Knusing deparinre-rit eiv. Earlfer tllis year we +,uere rated a"Hegh Perforrrree" kryr 1he DRparment uf He,uuSirig
lOr ihn ytw ,~nd ufban aeveloprneni, baseatl or, the Sec[ion 6 h+'lanagement Assessrment
Pragram
t1-.c sort= a Hi:u-ja~~ C tw1:=' k,vtk9x P.awdr)i I -
47-~~w? tt~: pr~wtid~ s;~t~l ~:~r.r ~nce ~~Y ~ldrrly, Ifonacally, signrt~carwt ftanLiing cut5 ~n ti~e 'NkVvF+S. Seeticn $Rent,al Assssianct-
dr~ai.i;~-ci xid yw7,• k+w-i r7,w tan„Ir:S *tFVM1,; Progranr t',asre seen us tatk,Ring cha€Ipnges thaT threiaten ta IiraiiG aasr wnrk; dnd
LYWti~rmrdm Ni'b'w+ll Rlai* ke ir„A'Wg~-J an a
dEaslirarly rf,Ju,-. d, fr~E-d irudtjei Fath,~r tqam a re5ar.c+. ~i posinve infliaenr.i- in tne irea caf 35sis~od hnut+ng. The Challenge s
irrIFnCnSe'tJuf I' me we can and m«st meea We are aJrsolutely tor'nnlit[ed to
rneetsng the der.tiaRca~ pIiced up[.rri us.
Thece sl-nu1d ~e rio inu5.an, slidt il "M tae possitA`
m maka aap frr~ trrc- Iem rrf thaw *oLR-a I funrh NEINF+S rs moving fcrrwaid wst.h strategic initiar,iupm +ro bec4er wrve the ~leed3 oi
a~,t+us~~=Otg E}~r. z~' Cwr-rniswjr+L-, rwts4- qtjr Ctamfnunwtes EquipRed rvith a bnld new mls7,!on 5CatFm,enY anrt a [lear netiv
eiirig cis°--antaiairrnerrt rrw_asurn r. LTn efftca 1o bu5anes5 lan wltl•, medStln bSe
~xir~t~r aLrr,~r ~ ~~I~r ~ &,r~Fr►y ffrg ~ ~ka ~ ~~~s r. workrn~ tt~ s~"ve aur clir~nt~ mc~re
r
t~rrri~u,rL~nn c! 3s.~ist~r+c~d ta~ sarr~ r~i~~~iss e#firi~ntl+~ ~*v~ry c#~~y.
Th,E3c
4Ne rrius# develop a bQtter Guthc urk6adstandii7y oi our rniisporo arid irivo'sve
A--dt,ct"g +.FiLk -4 rnuu,rcaf sribs,'of Fcy &acb r;~-rru+y pe4pfe in as rrkarzy innr)w.3aiwe ways as ,ve can, Mefping tO 105'er suppart af aur
corr,munity need Our v~~~~on for the ku[ure is to hurlcJ an what we're alrea0y
j5„+frli4''~PyVOLK?*" i17 lt'L33S mLh [joiflC] dfld TU'qILfE IC FtC+4Af £`t'Iefgy a(ld iflft'CtIC111 Irl the fI!I"m Ofi 54JCceSSfl}~ sol11$14f15.
a Jta~.~r-L~Sr ~rJiviru,~
Finally, thank yav k D tre Fioa(d. our ;*aff and thE! inereasi ng riurrraer af carrrrnun ity
partt1ers whcs work tnrsth u3 T.o implement tfie~p 5Dlu4ions. Their camrnitment to
- imprr,rvvir+r} t.n~ qvalsty caf ev~iry;hinq we r1o and carmant.ly err,Oaor?q tl7e chariqe
iPtEW ar.r.+, itcMit- vvrrte pr?~entrd Irx Mcusimn this bnng~ 67bout aFe vital ingrrrJients ipi r,ur ccontinued succe,&s
at a pudiLie emrrwn'i r"rincs Uri 54olaLne ln :1Aay
5!BtE rkMr-+~nta?~4, landir.Irds, WPanAt iLs h_par h1EJ4+HS has a~,tmfjlv and vd❑nderiuJ ~~jEmi Enat2ing ihat ideal is 3
sni} rr-.rm:mffs Of at-,t wut.,ur Fosfmiti?d, rtrnd vpG"~te complex anLi difficult c.haolenge ar1d as we rn[avc forwrard in:o a tjrn,- of qreat
t~d'tMe pY-~trwts L,72prc~ ~be RCY (riograrci r,m on rr.inge, it i5 a chdllenge'a+* Shaal rmeet head (3n
PEOprLLN rNE5 rrnd ihLo s;a(timijro!y at fargit_ Ar~j of
'.~k ~nF~y~tiSr~ -Xc-,31 .-,ffd +e~,.-4Ti0rq'rII~ iMpeL'.3 1'MW leat
YriN rmalt h~. ir+.!-ifficiant iundvg Today, we afe n ior3 ure~iared than euc3r before ta provFde the hciu5nng sc+luiaons
I+ti,,i! I)eIO low-ncurT:e ou-7c-ns ilu;- ue[EeF livps
Tt* rromt poa1nW+r5t tornmernEs +Nm fmTr. KV m-
musrq ei i st.1-,ed they ratkreir
pa"f zE h11hC!; FE?lt t'Clt3Pl seL} 7914`hF`T f$mLY[ 3w,,
Prt~v~ng ,~+n~~,~ain n~~ muz.tr ;I Diannfi Qu45t,
f:rr.:ibt-5 v,al uw 1)w1* htcuurg .3ss7A.wLm z+S IdiLi op.
oununriy i4 rtt[7wIiSe« $?wf': Ro imp►cml 4h&, r 111^xirs
A New Name: Changing Times, hangrng Priorities
~
Buildinhe 5pokar~e F~❑using Authcrn4~r is ir~ the~ !r~i,i5t ~sf s~rme of the
~ I aiqgest chang€~5 m it3 33 yTar h1SterrV, and W5 much mure ihan .Pw
C!'~~ 1,"1~~1~'~ n~%v I~oga an~i n.~me yrru s~ r:-A th~ cc,w~;rr Df thts annual reprsr1, ~
' TThese rhae~gc-s arv the +,fery key to ruF ;unnual Ind2„eci, SNA Ls
~r unr~erc~r~inq a re~sais5a~sce, kregir~ning with ~rt,r nevnr rnissian statemvnR-
in IYo~T least Building carnmuriltlcns tn Northeast tiNa,hingkon by lead+ng, advocating and
partd7erinci in tTe rreatfon of liuabde netghbnrhnods '
Washr ngton
Xnsle spo~~~ ~oijsrn~
b~y,~ l~iadin~ti,u',h+.7rity will tt~ntar~ue 1~{t?rC~i~S't i
i'~i[1~"t'a8':
7 ~i t-i ~erwp dS a,jr co~nra'e
n I
ad'lloci~~ing aCld we,,wen now tie
k;1s]wrs as Nerr9hLm5t
r~ ~'ash~ingtc~n HS~~aSing
p~ • - ~ _
a~ L'~'~` ~ ing in 5C1OQn5 - a new narne
and 1 naw ICok CU hei!p ,
the cf eatFo1"1 iIl:,mina~p wha ~ti4e are
iE7€,ay 8rld the neYv way'S
of I ivable iri Mtirri we are meet+ng the +aee-cis of athaingaryg rrr.arketplare_
neighborhoo4l s. Nottheast 4Vashing¢on Waus~nq 5olution5 ~hlFWHS~ is aIready Ifvinq ;,p to +t5
neav r.+.arne. We are workiraq rigorcrusly to foCuS i:5n a more solutions, k►ased
.3pproach to our nni~sprjn.We are using ch.ange as a pr,,i;ive atid dynannic
faree tes not o0y sustain but aGsa to yrow the haLtsing uption, for Iovv-
~ r;eorrs~ cmtens. An€i we are Uiiefmg inn-Dvatlve icJeas af, how to maxirra4ze
the u.aluk, of subssdy tlawarq mta t?~4p rpQlQn
We are reposiuomng ehi~ arga~ization to cont,nue to serve tow•-income
citiz-pns' hnusing needs but in €a; rrore eritrepreneueaal way, Ancl w+aale
tire catalyrs-h impeaiing us into thLs perirsd of transformabon are te5king fihe
restliency of a31 Of Us, we arE respand~n.q by serting unnova4ive ri-ew graaas
anri priorities and by furr,ona rl,reats into c+pportunities ta address the
~ cnallenge-, before .,s
°JU'e 1n1Qnd tn bsadci f7in crur past and dpveliDp a steuc:ure for tbe futuae that
cari tsesl. rJellver our new mis3Errt Dec-4u5e in the LRic, weare Pn the EiusGness
rf chanq,r1e bw4L-s anid ihat tivi* nQver charqe.
~
~ Housing ior Vulnerable Populations
D~-
~
~ T he extraisrdinary changes that li.aVe resulreiJ 9n Thefesa Ew•ery iommuniry negds access *o the kind Ot SuPPOrt services *he
5irncin feadinq an inriependen- life at Hifumi En bc-gan nevveyt fJE'J9IFi5 property, HiiLirni En, prmrides anci Thete~a 5imnn
vvnen Sfie Succes$fully ceifeipleted a tfedtment program fGr cn::lrjri't agree mare "I !'ec-J reaily safe h ece," she says, a7estied
sulmtar7re dbuse Fkouuever, het pnor phM€.al and mentaa in imurqL he( eolleciion af siuffed anirndis ir Fier Hilurria En
f, ei ltl ) presEwerJ furthQr challeng+--s arrd with areFerral frorn awartrw,ent. "J wou1d hKave been on the streei it it hadri'n haue* tseen
Suppnrtiur, L+uing Semi:es. Theresa rnaved irsi4 hPr {irst NEWHS `or fJEWHS
managed prop€;'rty, Thp Phoenix Apartrroilrits.
ThL, htiiumi En rvrprusQP.t5 a ,ignrficant oc:hiE~vvment fcif Nf'tiWi5
Tl-ie 42 transE'ror'Faf 1cuing 5'tsdio5 ate r7arnaged by PJE1+'JFi5 aritl a5 Q ur tirsr ProjecE Bascd $ectiors 8 acq ur~ itoor, A.5 we ctanr.inuc
feprestni thc} firit ct►opera[r.•e F)rOje[t vwfaerL, as art 0tgAr7f2al.10fl, our kvv,Tk to irnprove the quair~y ot Irfe far tiulnerable, Imav-rntome
wo havT, parm~~red }vith a seporate properry nwner, SP&Ane Peopk- in NprtheastWi:+hinqinn, preserving saf€r, affordable
ntinty. Yn pravidE! independent rn~~~agement 5enrice5. hou5in+g in th+; eorrrTrtunitir,5 °.uc- sen-P is~ a top pnarity. This y€,3c';
M~w puTC1145e i{ a trern€Fnrduus 4Sset to our p€it3[[rljc~ and will p14y a
'hree NzWHS Cin-5i1e re$ideritial mjanager~ proviile stmces that rritital rnle M yu~jranteeing hiousii7g ior thaw popuiations Far i,7tq
:,n,ijre asafe erivirDnment for fh-0 PFoer+ix i, menTasly eii.ziiiblecl the futuae
re,iden!s, rrany c,F wt•turn, vwotilci otneru7w tse hornelpss. t3-tie
NEWHS sxaff vrwk cIc,selu v,ri#h resident5' caseworkers Pfavidin~q ~IC°J~!lNrS Iaunc~recl an Ci1er~ss+w~ restc~ra;icin rrf the prc~perty, ,erclud;ng
*[~+~e i.3ciliti~s io hefp tt~rr, learn hoah+ Ca iiVe 9r~rieoendr ntly. AS new vinyl wfndqw., appEiancc-5, flr,ering, NVAC 5Vem5 and a
a tran5ilitanal twng #;3cilits+, msir1[rM, SCdy zit The Phaeriix Prar d ~~ea5in,g nr,-~+N 11and5Cape '{o enCnarrag~ rcAenT3 To 54pend Time quq-
mar;imurr, of six months, after tr,+l,ich the goal is to Tr=7n3iti4n to af-dtscsrs 1he Kifwmi En is one rnore ex3mple of NEWH5' impartiint
permanvrat hou:,ing Tere~a- found fier permartew horrse ift Ihv s#ewardship philsr;EaPhY - Iunq•wsAn prewnrition Qf hou5ang tici-r
Ffciw,mi Erv low-dncrirtie residgnt5.
, 4h e~- ~ _ • _ ~a~
4dW l - • _.s F _ - J
Xa -
~ - ~L ~
, -
• .
C4 M
_
, ~ .
~
` • ~ 1 l ' _
Charrging Liues witht Housing and SuRpor~ ~
~ ~ Lj
S havon, Lo►r,f telierr2r~ that by pro+rsdiny suppanive hou5ing. Wer €letefraiiria9ion paid r~fi Her bahy +n~a -1 retrr rieu co hur.anC a year
h1fWHS cQuId help chap-ege tM:e live2 af h~rx~r.e(ess farriilws later, Mia,rertiq rc:,1nple-4ed an ;ntensave recrrvery prograrn equipped
living in pov€e[y aeir,! c6sis Her ~assivn Is nmw a real+ty it+ with~ a healthy selF-fsteerr and new pateniirsg SN.ills. 7mpr-a and
she fDrm of the h`EWH5 Sharon Lrxd Ap@r*ments, namea ;r~ Aniece rnuw?si t_s Sk. A,1.t-irgaret's ShelLer
rtonpr cO Trlls remarkab:ie woman_
Here, SFsamn Sla:Jelman became tiefi case r~nonager, advising,
Often, tihe,difference ve;vre~n a cJrent~; wccess and fallure as 0~ IrttN quiding artd helDing }essica identi#y tticir qnais. Jessiea ~oveii
12xtra suppon WriMi #hE help ot Ca!ncoEic r_;-hantiey' Sr Marqare#'s Yoruuard, toking ese+ more respcrnsibiriay as &fie experienr.ed su~cess_
She9ter, wit.~ wl-icsrn NEWNS c€sntizict-s far supporl serulce5, '[fie four In shart nrcler .,he earned hcr GED and Xhpn her drivee's licec*,se,
~ham17 L,4rd Apa1'Cme?1Cs are alfeady f01 gt 5klC4e-S5 SIk}fhe5 SLJ[Fr 45 enrr,alled +n coflege an,ca held drawn a jeb
lessi{a Ham,maFncl and her daughrnr, Aniece-
il's 41 grea i s;~c,,essslary°," sBy-s Srd dt~linan 'She haS su rrruch
5raduating from 5t_ dviargarrz.-5 Shel;E?.r wa5 an arriazzinq ad'diuvtimens rryaisvabDn an.d ha5 CakQri thp iniCiatiMA tti ~Changv 4aor Clfe
far 1essica who had experieneiA fe+N w4~wr maments s.i~acE the age Tfte Sharnn Lnec. Apartneqts are perfett ior 17er Wi.h a lVWe
o# 13 #it-r Isfe of adrJicto(in firralPyr ended vuh,eri, upon qivtrg birCh tci 5upRort, she .s thriv+ng "
tier dauyhter, da7j1
c5 va-ere fnund in 1he baby's syVern and the chsGa
was placed %rr protecriue cu5t4rty. "By a rnlraclt-, Ae~iKe tivari nealthy aessica mrved irito rFer apartrr~ent in Miiy. Finally, wifi:ti d plare o4 ht~r
at wa, the forst tierie a rememher feeirng any emcaflm and I vowed to own, shc hKr, takeri on anew prnrJurt~ve ralie in hef csrammunity. "1
de any±ning to geC her batik." riamembe:s 3psskca can'k wadt for aII ihe firsu Anle~c- ~~rid Iwill Piave un ciur iniew hou5e,.'
5he eT1thG15ei. 1'I'n goIflg !o in3M.e hF'T pf9l,Yd
~
'i~ ''r-
-
'change is reWW
11
~r ~ 1,
o~t111r■
I V~►a S I LrC
%
op e to supp
' I
rr~ e -
m,ade a1I the ~
. ~ - .
~ - 7__
re%ics Harom~tri~` ~ f
~ I .
,A Hor1"1e fof Posierity
N -
Iot Igng agca, the Di-o5pect ¢i ripmQ otiti`nership avas ju~~ ,a Wflcn 51,elien wvas told that she was a can&iatR for 1nQ avvarij. ;he
tantasy fc~~ Si-jeIlen RsGpp Hut ;hrc,ugh a uniqve prDgrarn krrew^ exartPy what slie would wrrte in her essay expta:ninu what
rrLitiated by Hayden tiome-5 based sn ftedm,nd, Oregan, harre awnershiip Mvould mean to her 'w tiave two kids on di;abili#y
5uellers ks ncrw the proud nuwner r-if a brar,d nkxw #same. and J'm riok yc,tiEiq tD be here dorever A house cif our own rm5uhd
rrie,~ ri iha; faiy k.:r~s wi11 al~v~y~ h ave apkace [o call hame and Fk'at'S
CEO Hdydei7Watiwrt establishe-J the Hayder, HcausLng Grsnt as fiPao rnost Inyprartanti this7a to rne."
a tE6b«te ta hrs pareri4s, who pasi.ionateiy believed tliax e+reryone _
needs and de5~erves al7on7e. Tiie Havden Giving Fur9d builds and SuelQen was awar~ed the hram~ oased na her essay ai-to ner need
donates a afand rxew 17rme to a wrorthy candidafia and N€V4'HS wa5 Sfie gavc. $ 1500 ai her FS-S eicrow sa.vrngs b~ck io the Hayden
.asl~ed tci s0ect trGm its r-nanv prograrn Q-artieipants. ~oun•datron. tivhich aIso arranyed ?ar ner 5140.0100, 30 year, interest
firee Ioars Today her aab ai sl•ie Cerrter ior Jasttice ur,ngs her di{e #uII
per5o n In Me space of fsve dr,=~P "I knnw 1iraat fhe peopl-P I htap ciftert rawe the sarre sssues tl
It'~, hara to imaqine a m€,fe c~e5ervinq
year-s, Suellen Isas rift-pd hesself f:orn the depth.s of despair and had and I've becarn« the b°gWt advocaEe for atfGrdaEile hc,using,
rpnnplime welfare deperadency, partaci{xated iri NEVVHS' Farnily SQlf hecause of th:E opPorturrities I was gtwen."
5U#fLriency pmgram, worked, ~ttended coIleqe and saved monev pn
her eVfOw aCcaLjrrt. SueGlen talks en:husiasr,ica0y about NVWH5' role an her suctm
"Af#rjce~abie rent anri a:devuate F►ov,5ing r5 5ueti a huye parl of
Lorre Stevens, cine of ihe NR%IHS sraff membcrs +nrhe heIpeo st-led recove r;r and sv(:cm - ghey YiteraHy saved my lile "
the canr:iidiles„ reariernters Sueflen starding crut becau5e nf *he
enOmnDlrs chang.m she had made in hef ii(e 'SPies acIi€nm Iv+n91
a1ways rPrnember - she exceeded aII expet: tatluns."
-
A
«
- ~
~
~N ~
, NA
.
ki~s wlrl ' ways have
, a pC~ce to c 1 1`loalrle.~'
, . - -
5u$Iten RsrRp w>lil-t tl,nuqttwrs ;
Linda af'Id Cieyen~'f~: i
- ~ ~
r~
~ ) p -
Unlocking the Dovr to Horne Ownership
~
- - - - -
N EWHS' fsnk-time home cvmership program s an ne55e5 +s Ei± .he heart o' the ,ease-pur['his~ ~fograins svi:~S. The
+nri rvative mDdel oralsed by organI ; aticrns acro,s rhf, FederaK Hnme Lnaru 9ank ofi 5eiitt6i? p ruvrdes hFVVt+F:~ a 1, 10,000
raticafi "Vtrelfome F+orrie" Ig a snlla korative effnrt qrant v%,t,;ch 'is !used towards the dc,vwTk paymen t and cla5ang r_crsts of
be±ween area bu:sinesse~ and agLancips trrat pr[5uides the ltcu5e Fs:ar adeporsit o1 $SfJ{?, WrtrrEf ageneies soch a5 Spokane
the Oppo; tunity Ir~ pwchase a newly crin5trurteo hnme for a Htrrrietiwanvrship Resrurce Cenl~~ and a lacal +eaItot heap thr- homE-
S 3c70 dvpoSiG buy+pr ;.hmqh the putch-ase pr~r~s,
~ fn~ prQgra m. rs paft,cul.arty s~cizer-~srul u u e zo i u ~ implicity; ua3u~ f or Once qualif,eti. the bUyr-r i5 abie to Iease the iiewa home frorTi NE-
i rrioney and thc- neN nnrafernAner'~ high sense of mat,vataor, and WHS ficsr uP to one yp-ar, with the optoon of as!iumpng tl,e a°€7oragaue,
satmxiactrur-w "4"lelcorne Fiairie' help.s to rneet the neett fnr ciff9rd- by quaO&g for FHA Ioan assumption arry 1Emc dLirsng tMai first
a61e housir+g hy ass?sting thn~e wha arE Linable to sii~cure zi rnort- year
gage irom morre t~adit,ortap sovrces f,~ alscs a waludble Way to meel
tI-ie NEUVHS° objec*mre rsf builciurrg Wla:nced, m,x8cl carrlmumTim "Thil prngram is pnpular with appiicants becAu4p if 'rs easy 3O alres.s
an[t marraQves a siqr7ificatat basrigr ta home oti+s+rier;hip that at#terwvi5e
MatT Aakra, wMr, nas wotved rr the healtricare indijstr}° in 51)okane, miqhs rs&rer bLu ouercrime. Wc- I,ke the program becawe it acrueu-m
is rrne af i+le tate,t pariopant sn the pt❑gfam, ' I rnadie- enougl'i r,ur guals in an inn4uatw+re way wdtbout J s:iqnr#iearit f;nancia,
to be abl2 [O al#ord hae;5e pa1+menis, bud f vM3s nuWtr odle tn 5aire 5ay5 haEWH5' Lc+nnie r=tln-F'oerce, wf°ir., sp=rr1 ;vwo v2a+s desiqn~~ ig
eriolaqh. mr+neyr Scsr adown p(iymeni or tt~e do-,mg co5t5." 5r~ys the prograrru Wcm He and his farr+ly wfre thc- perre4 candpdates fof `Wefrrrr~
Hof7`t€.+ " "I,ifQ feP1ted fL9f ~ long tlfTie anC! IT.3 irnLi.'rng Fn tiTlril°y ri5,'vfl :iPi_i i e:l
vvonrierfLi l fl4Me 1hat"5 drl G+«f c3Y,rrt b`~~r a°aj r=1y q rEtle rsil',--r
Tfi* rommitmo~in? ani] cmopeiation of partner agendc-- and husi- ctire~~e~nkz', harLiws,rk, '_.3y% h.A1n
i
.
come Home f i n ; I ,
heI ~d rne get past the rrier of a dc~~'
fl ~ ~
pa t4
- 4i -
n t ` r _ -
, ~ _ • .
-
1
-i[ f 7r
46,
~ ~
NEWHS Announces Reci~ie ,t: of Coilege Chaifenge Schofarship
~ ~
- ~
i S m~ 1 a 'vwF,o's Wkro ' a rnw~~:Fliyh School Sturlents, was
of her hiqh s0oal gradvaaipq .lass 0 i,J at eourse, pias a perler! 4:0 e-3FA IVcit
vurvffeStinqly, CdEUVhIS' saCyarta lag+r. ~-,!rL vi ihe revipients of !he 20U4 Pad:ir
ydor:hw.es; Reqiunal Cauntf - ~~AH .3uvarci, for pardir-ipar+rs in ~ member
Fousang ageFTc.Y PI`ajT-am_
N£WHS' reA _ pr,iyiding wfe.
attcn,,daiste hou'xma 4o Iow incomp
re%FCi-:~n"_:- mity-n h;gitllqh ts otdtief
"quality of lafe` rip-t-Js Fw rnarTy
Vuung rwaple lre c+ur crim~~~~ities ~
th~ opprjrtu ri ity :rr pur~suc a Ngho-a
!6^JLJcc~iIoP1 64 2rP1 i~,n.1S{Ve dReal"Il. FCJC ' y:♦,~;.~. -
-
at?ar_ DF ~rjr dfents. T;~tyaiv. ihaa *'~3 ~ ~ a..y. ~
ctrearsw nas became a rearrty,
+ I 1Y44 and wtJdf G ip, SppScziw w etih ~ ~ ~.=Y"' _ , -
~ lm t}sarr seven hur3c~ed itrid fRtty . r -
~
I ~
dtdIar-, kra th-e►r njrr,.~_ Tta~ ~aouJv yy dOp~
sisuyhl thn Ssdppc5rt c~f NE'wL'I-15 ~ar7el
p dKa=r7e -4 partinpans iit the rfouwig
prcugr3m F~nafTy sib'se to aff€5rd
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .
- ,
iiL,n--e~ynt houvra,„ their v+rotld began
la Sfiani lln, ~ - ~ ~ ~
I~"►. 'r~
Whera'14;YAna vntrol?i~ci E3t ;i~~ CZ,[
eIem&itary sth~~l &he! ~poke riot
a word oi EngIish. rhtough sFE--r
~r
she ci€I~~r~ w7e4~,
**ck iyy N"k dn-d Iearpei hffw to
Te3k. -.irriEe arrd raitk 6y 1r:e tirnc-
she stwte-J Jun,err HigM; 51he ~Nds .c,p.
af ttse :1~.~ In n1+,,.'51 o;~ya~y
. ~
~ i . 1~- ons i
~I~ r~ ~tsi ~ o n
to ta d~ iirptrd ptawrjerai r-W,es4rsd .
ar-eo►ding 'o onp of hcer pro#iie~ssams
~ :7iNa}rs g7ipa "ar bqjcondwhat 'The s
f
e~
Kr-waner~~ting her dreanra schct,o..
a
p r
~:°i;rrT~°y d "~d1J+J~°fa,'i' 47~r,~ ~P iFI!' 3
J ~ r~ ' . . R fti' r~u~~r~ pra~rj,, sr7e ~:s lot~"r,a.n^ ~Iore ~ ~
ionn•aod to rrakin g diffemnte
~dtl[+Y p~,~fe~ irv~. * help
~
_
~ "1 come frzxn 2 poor tamrfy and CU others;P
15 sucn an e-YPwn3r~V wi.00° I rtNti-r
fttiqht I°e~oul-d !se 2b1e to a!!or=9
~ f~,' s~~ ~~a. sc~:~;ar~i~ii~i ;
mzde aJ 1~i'-*,~fr^~
.
.
.
~
~
~ ~
The Goal of i(ldepekl~ent L1 lfig
`s t.~rr-- IAai7lE1i11iM rT`~.CIr}wv CJf a sEIV 'irn_r
mwe prE---srj re is plmed crn I+~~;1+' rn provide alrflrr.lalil+• r+ouseng tc- tl,ust? iri need. Iri tj,i~
orrr24t atiir most am p►oyram; ha5 beer, rF.c Family So:f 5uff{ciprrcy (FSS)
Aprogiarn Tr~ir}iGJty, th~ DepaTlPn A Fia-usmg anrJ 4Jrtaarr Elf~,+vloprr.pnt is reducing fundirrg
r~:,r a4w~ed },,«usirig aald no rrevv fafr°xiUtd4 ~~s-,;--s; ~nr;?IIp~:I - P,his program
~~a4~r the y2a,ry. I teGs ~riarct irtir~~!n!iwe ~
,I prc,.grarn h~s prr,=,rideri r, unnaue ci-p_
PofunlAj- tn w4E;r pFnp1e %ead u,de- ~
D€.`rIdmt lIve"i IFc`svtlVk(,5 I~~~fl~'8 xo wT "FSS e, ped _ d, . ! N - d t ine
g+o!s and lind ~r,•,y,y~r~~+~~st anr,~ ,5-,
tl ieir +:Itu,;ii rkrif, irrprcr,*-J antt earn • • accountabill'ty I never had. I*m so
sngs hticreasierl, the higNof re+7t fxrr:d
, _ .
wa3 placieml rr:tasa;ring~, Aftur flv~~ . O : : = * ~ s~. .
~ews -ancs rampe~ei,on tY. ttEe paDararrE. -
famiaie: -nouFa adsp'Cf~~ fLtrrd-o For vitsar-
ev~ purpr,`-~es they four1d' !o be mos:
Cindy AJqm, titiap) cco*dmaled Ehr,
prngram fi-it NEWHS. W-~EVL,; Ik
was auC;--U:~4#U t-6uu"- it ber,c-fl ~ed
bGik° t'•IEWI-I; t~rl+d oUI' Eil,f[?t r-,4erv
gradua!e frorri'the F55 prog raf 11 V!-a} j
timmrkabl~ sto±-y Ieaqin9 towards
Wmir, irlrkrre'';drsr~-o. " szry~ Atger, ~
Orie oi t.hu nnoy, 5atkiIi~d F'55 taar-
ticipan~s rs SarFdra S9°sorc= Mo tao~, ~ .
firu~l advantEe4t oF NEWH5' ser,irs-s_
>211dra and h- fi~Iq-- (Yiil+trt-n wede W-
~ 4 ~•r~~ ,~qd
irr,l crn ~•.~I~~re and beirig tvrir-Iud fron)
:-nIi rer [vl ~*w:~ vvhen they wc-re
r-. ~ .
~
~tlia:s;,~ 1~vy uve--e olig.:,,bte fDr hl€+!'dH 5
~~~r~~r~•:~. "Sudcden;y we frati ticiQe. ` .
xundQa.
~~s ta;r~,~~~~rt c~r~rmsr~r~~~~s;rr7medi-
§Lt ~ - ~
,i titm*ryabQwT hoi rSinr. e-
4':Ofk]P'Fg, holdIRg up m ktin--e jnbz ,=.j ~ ~ . y .
_lr-~! Vrrie, ar1d ,rMrmoliaowly enri~,llrx.
~I r
F 5 S~c r~afI1R°U i[3 Set gf1,3k ~FId
priDrltixe„ artll kiia €n41 C' -.1,i;, Edin&.-
rs t~
[h+? morE ahc- sau&'1. Sr;erdfa s;i,?17U
4TPdl fiorii FS5 e,-cTF-! S3.0I70 in aavinuv ,3nd ~5 enrioJ1Fj in the iritorl[Jr dETti,. ~
P:r~gFUrn 2ft ia ~,QC51 cOllNe 5hic COn -
lonuw.s 9u ',varic G.%o jLlbs ancl'uVR1f reiy
rrl "+~rWH{JtC+ht°lp rF'laf' tif?T J1o4Js111a
°st
LV M1f`I Ij flt ~5 F,~ dy -FI x~ .
~~..'-f1~ xipit
VC '?iLir,' ;,nm the proqrur~
nw t~ Lm ac; ouritilr}le and h.tow C-o .
rn',raqe trry monef it hfifped ma .
hreak, z efay-#o-day s unvw r m ef,~taliS~!
i 4r~~,~r thiat:~"Ie~r~ ~nr+•II ~ ~ life?, me
f
h;aktit, I'rri ;~jrr'F rrttiae
People worw't ime ~
ab1iO to I did
Creating F1~~~s Where Feopie Warit T~,~ Live
- - -
•;;,r... .._.`ri~,Ir,~ry,;,,_:.. r, •~,rr, tn~7::.1'?i~5 7~~llar'Sifl ir,c' ar~t[
~ -„I ~ irt r Cl :s l l , - ,.;j IrJ.+.. `f..;rr',E- lei''I 11, F
_ F . . fi j, a _ _
vw'iI 3I~r1a~ t!- r~JE~r'~'!-i5Lnre p~.e;7ose I-Irrraewz-r, ti~ut, ~9rr~ pr?aljer,ie: i~ti~Nri ,i*+e~ rr~~~rtat~fl_ :a,~n~~r7'~'e the q:::3~r,y at Ia1R
F.een ly av,Pdre rftat we are alsn in Ihe bLa,arsM V, imp rovi ng fnr feSadEnts. wrs addiGiOn, caur tForough on5petfiir-ir.s tequire tfw
PpElopLe's lives Good quality housing us e~senxial to a heaMtiray qualifvirig sental aSSistann ,prt~pf.r;ies conilearns I[o ltrgh ,tandards
.onnmun,ty and just as [mpcrr~ant aFe places vvtaem vw. Ie wint rnturing dll oUF r1uents livo in ofe, as weCl as offo1daYrle horrRS
Preserving fQw•incorrie housii7g fcar the lang-t&m ~ a tor~vi~;torae
Ceoay ~,Vent, a NEWH5 markek rate bonr.l vcaoery, avaiiible to of the NEWFI'S stewarrt;hip phi14sr3phy as i5 ihe tnras@ use of
;hose whra make Iess 1hiin 80 pprcen; of area median inr.ame, i5 re,nurci:,s to a~-hieue thal end ThiS: v'eat wvt~ gained Ca3i 0, itrenoes
une sufi) tmam-ple T#re Td apar#ments are 1ocated in a resFdent,ai by [nnsolidating u,-ndrar fssr ipecific mairrtenance se~rvaCes and vve
vrea rn rtiortYrvvegt Spiakarse, i7Cow to school,, public trarispart routes look ~~dvant3ge of econorme5 of scal'e by packaginr.i dll rurra#r+action
,:nrJ hatura1arpa1. The graund; #eitur,e pine tree5, uvalking Poths under unp cantrain. In a prciartiue siance, +,w creati-il a preventive
aricl a perimeter fi~n«. m:aintPraanco I.earn fo inspeci alV ~~opertit-s and idontriy po1eflWk
ptnbWirns Wote they ykart
Triis year, NEVVFiS irive5tprJ aIrr,c,st $50Ci.(]00 ta cample2e an
.,xtens-ue seiur#aishrnent at the orig arid t+nro bedroorti apartment3 4ir We must ne,ree f-orgc-t zhat w5e am iri bu41111255 fUr Peighborhrocis a3
CedarWest The Rro;ect acfdress-pd problems with rr7old In a nLimher weit as rndiaicluaks antl we euntiriue to put our energy intD ereat+ng
uf the unrts 45nd rernediation v4prk resulted in new roo+5 frir dli glle3cEs wnerre (venvle vaar7t to ~ive {edar We,4 ia one example, a5
burld lnas, replacemen1 ci# eLxterior Aing a nd I n-;taliation of nevr -vinyl we striv+Y to deliuer a heaithy mix of Piuusing tYpes tllat trr,ates
'wrnd~~ The aRa rt ments a Iso benefite d fto m ach ee ,ry coat ~ustainzjble corrsniianit;es.
of special vsnVl "paint" to heJp prutec? :,4ar Inve5trrien~ well intci
the 4ature.
~ - - -
~
. •~I ~ i~
r
~
- r -
A ~
I
1i~
- - -
~
~
i,
-
-
" - * - ~ ■ ► ~ '~h~'
~
-
• M ! # t i # , ~ * ~I
I e
, _ . ' ,
_ u ~ _ -L~E GI • .
w } ~
_
y T~
~ - _
- -0.7
~ - ~y
Financiai~ 2004
~
Co9 ribned Balarice 5heet.
ti Fi Jur,e 30, 2004 (urcdLvjitEd;,
isiUe=.
Ca=,h & cas•r equivdlc-nts S 5ori, 185 Acmt.irwt5 payot;dr; ~ 158,476
IrFVC-.-Mnents 3.2a434 if)zrrprogram Uayable ~}.b4"t
Tenar~# ~,.-uriry c~si~s 187.2~ @a,rah1e t~r F~1JL1 223.891
4Peewatlells, tunant and gryvemrrr~entar 166.04E Accruc-d eNpL4~ 346,6r.1
!rr!vrprr-q,a+v~ r€c&~e 436,611 Dei~d Tvenue & ut1er kabik;'t3e5
298,853
lnveritornes 7.677 &OrwJc- & notes payable, curient 368.975
t]kter a-'sm 46~ 327 9and5 & rof-M payabc-. nonr_urrent 19,237AG
Lantl, bulWings &c-quirxment net A# depT. 26,7E2,1 00- rather norcusren., Iiabilrtwin- 943.063
- ~ntall~ilie~
Ne'; fund equ't}r 9.719,839
T~I ~ 531.73i,798 Tcat~ EDfi~e5 &~ur eQt+G~ 531.+T3i.d118
Corrrybrned Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changp-s in Fund Net Assets
Of hlmE K : 0Cld 0urL,'Audl!c-J7
HC49E & HCOWA Ta.r( Cledl,, 8arrk Unr~y'ri~
C.3pitaJ Furut3 .xin #i $Oth-r Gmt S Otiher PrpL-,-Tws Fljrt-J Tat31
r-Iriusang rhwtariLm payrnents b - 319_M,$75 3 - S - S $ 15;677,875
~~abo, subwty
FtIqK,i«arrie
250,464 :.912,97: 437,305 3.6au.%:
Adm i r i f5tratn,e 4-ns5 - 2,57d,1 M
~,57~7, 19:i
GPr~Il Purw~ 21H.650 - 1,087,OA 1 383.812 27.85€ 2,2 1~0359
haf~_el',Y-tc,,u_ Intorm 13,39s 53,178 t 44:554 36:{)?2 142,4;pq ,
~C]fliL ~PJEfJUE ~~4f 2.r 3~k~,1~7 .T4~s7.t~11 3,134t,738 2 3 3 2$,427,55C} ~
Lxpt)qlw--
h~ulwg asislmre pa}Trrerts S • S 19,617,$75 5 933,126 5 3 -
fl5~~k,+1 T,~fJ1
rau~irq f~~CiOr~
~.timIrc;tra~~~ses, nat o} ' 35b,1'~S - - 1,355E1,'739 - 1 7*, 0,9-,,3 I F' 2S~V.{]81 2 1.5~12 53:,235 ',~143.C!"+2 I
rrrara7 r=~
IrR,pE5r~?1"K~ 1?l.r.a73 - 27,Q 1
~,7 07,~-7
- 1,105.s~A 43,345 1.149,499
~9 IJa96 41,341 1478674
114']~9,?71 Zi 331 ~{,'~]v ],OS7~931 3LL5?~~'3 ~5 G'S7 c~8 ~5~1~?Er
Id+~dJh.'PE SL~CJSS)BE~F CC1FfR61JT1ONi 1353.+360! Qf ~eQaq] If.;ii,17F., 4i7?,3.i6;:
4d~1 71 ~'~f'11F~74JlIOf15$ ~6L~f~ ~ ~L~1.Cyj 7 d f ~ 9,f 1 :71 - ~
f~fJ&6, 129.~}3i3s~60 5~ ~
_Ch,._+ar m net asser3 (356, GC511 r 1 y~.5,56" r 179,17;p 335,789 058.951)
,
rJcot a~stu~an =I-q ~-ar 1 r 1,235 - , 31566 186,9 71 10,078 , 790
rJt=3swls errdofyYat S4R5 B,':~5 S ,GE~.331i ~ S 3,3~7,?1b S 1~??_759 ~ 815
~
~
Servxce Area
~~{~-~gl{?c~:~i `v %~~1Frnlj~yC✓h ~4pFr:rsal,7 ?s3~pCit~ !1~~'€''~~.~► latr, ;~~T~F' tunT*l~: ft'~
3 ES ls rn fiw-- s.nun tro -
, -
. , ~ :...t
~ NrWHI3 !#iGT19'i.6h4ot9c. ~15f~^~Lrf~l^ I'#tiyIaI-lY±dj CktC,lst-9±''.j* s:-36t ifi
'3E5;r,Qw -
Pet1* 00-~. 4e rG71,.'f11}t' 4-6 00 l -
WhalotllAlI C:7l1l1,Cy+ 11 w4 5-9,00C~ ° -
Lr"kcoln Ce1! i°ity OA,000
Northea~~t Washington HousGng Solutions
~~~ane Newport -
55 M~~on Aue . Sui1te 104 240 N Unian. Suite 9 _
Spakane, °4til«~ 99201 l;Izvpcrt. WA 99156
500-326-2953 5019-44°r.S6F4
Cotville PulEman Davenport Ste,ens Coun!y Rural Rm,;,urh Ccurnmum;rrActoR L?iitefi Lincsln Co-unty Fi{;;usirjg Au1#7urity
956 5, h+1ain, Surcf A 350 Fairmont 4,vp , 4.E_ P.0 Bex S17
CuIvii[t-, ~VA 99114 Pulaniin, #NA 99163 Ea~venport,'4YA 99122
509-725-0363
~
~
I
~ 55 fr!Iss.s•, ~,~e _~,~,,~~1~-r W'~ 99201
~TM 111c&-3F8•2953 f+4)#: 509-3~)l•5246 T[?D; 509-34i-9502 ~
!)l.x~rs ii..r~ u~.~E•y.E..i riP.R Flutf,. ~...~Is,.,;su....qi ~-~'_tlv'Ir. ,
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 01-15-05 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ near business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Tax Increment Financing
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
~
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND:
Jon Eliassen of the Economic Development Council (EDC), Robin Toth of the EDC, and Tom
Reese of the City of Spokane will give a presentation on Tax Increment Financing.
~
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGETlFINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT:
~
ATTACHMENTS
C-CA OT
VVashington State
~
Tax Increment F'inancing ~
Widely used thi-oughout the U.5., Tax Increm.ent Financing (TIF) allows local
governments to capture fu.turc increases in property tiaxes that result f,rom public
unvestment in in.frasti-ucture. This futurc properfiy tax value increase is used to
finance public infrastructure.
TIF allaws local governments to:
1. Capture a portion of the local incrcase in tax revenue stimuJated by
developinents in a specific geographic area (stahe partion of property tax
is retained by the state and is excluded from ulcrement calculation);
2. Utilize thnse funds to build public in.fxastructure, such as road.s, scwers,
parks, which wTill encourage and f.acilitate economic activity in the area.
TIF is designed to promote and #acilitate orderly, planned development, to help
local governments financc public improvements, to cncourage job-producing
p.r.ivate development, and to expand the public tax base. 1'he TIF incenrive also
opcns new doors for developers, local govern.ment and the coiiunuiuty.
Washington state law permits financing o£ "public improvenlents" u.sing the TIF
%
incentive. This includes new construction and/or unprovements to streets and
roads; water, sewer and dr.ainage systems; sidewalks and. li.ghting; parking,
terminals and docks. Paa~ks, recreational and enEer.ta.i.n.ment facilities also qualify.
Among Yhe expenses that can be covered tltrough "f IF are environrrlenYal
ai1a1yses, professianal management, secuxity and maintenance, plaiuiing and
promotion, and historic preservation.
Local taxutg districts, includulg cities, t0wns, Counties, port and fire districts or
any combination thereof, are eligible to create and approve a TIF-quali.f.ied
dishict. School diskr.icts are excluded.
The process for esfiaUlishing a TIF district is specifically outlined in statE law.
pevelopers cnust nleet with tlxing district(s) responsible for creating the area to
discuss fcasibility alZd details of the develQpment plan. Specific boundaries m.ust
bE clearlp ideniified. A "ti•ue and fair value" assessment af the area befor.e and
after the development takcs place, needs to be completed. Formal action (a vote
of elected officials arid .f.ire districts) and specific, written authorization is
requir.ed. Publie hearings arE a]so r.equired, witih advanced notice, public
postings and specific elements of thc plan detailed. Taxing autharities then adopt
an ordinance that includes all elements r.equired Uy d1e statute. Public
impravements are expected to encourage private development of an area and `~J
in.c.r-ease the fair market value of real property. Private developmcnt nlust be
~ consistent wikh plaiuung policies and the area's comprehensive p1ai1.
The taxing authorities then rnay issue general obligation bUncis ta pay for t•he
developinent, or use sECUrity and other sourccs fUr financing. The CQUnty
Treasurer distributes ncw tax revenues according to a statutory formula that
allows public and private entities to share in the success of the revitalization
effort.
New tax i-evenues generated by thc developmenh are split betWeen the taxing
authoxities, which get 25 percent, and khe debt service on the bonds, wh_ich gets
the remaining 75) percent.
For instartce, n pcarcel of utideveloped prapertij with a firtce atid faix value
of $250,000, is iirrproved to a valice of $2.25 rnillioti. At a 4 perceytt tax
rate, fil:e r:ew developmerit wili ger:erate $80,000 in new tax revenues.
Witlt TI,F, tlte tax authorities sliare $20,000 of those fisnds, and $60,000
goes toward clebt paynzent.
Once debt service is retired, the TiF districfi is closed and taxes are redistributed
to the tax aukh.orities.
~....-i
TIF can protect axea pxapc.r.ty owners hom shouldering the burden of local
develapments, and opens up new opparhuudes for developErs who are lookulg
1t underutilized areas. It can be used effectively as a tool for growth
management, allowu1g government to direct development anc.-I in-fill by
impa-oving nr installuig public infrastructure u1 an area.
Senate Bill SB 5325) expands legislat-ion to allow the usc of not only increasetl
local property tax revenue, but also increased sales and use tax revenues from
the increment area. A st2te match of local revenues, up to $1 million per year,
per project, will be deducted from state sales and use hax revenucs.
Companics and individuals that want to explore Tax Increment Fina_ncing, can
contact the Spo]<anE Aiea Econoinic Development Council for guidancc, counsel
and assistanee. Contact:
Spokane Area Econoinic Development Council
(509) 624-92$5
edc@edc.spokane.net
www.spokaneedc.arg
Tax Increment Financing:
Opportunities and Challenges
e,1~~frl~,y~-~y:
q3 nt71~~'f~'I 1
c=°~
~
_ . y
a
~
. v
Thom.as A. :Reese, MA., .ASLA.
Econon-iic Development Adviso.r.
Office of the Mayor, City of. Spo.kane, WA
City of Spokane Office of die N4apor,
2/9/2005 Eeonumic De.vel~-~pmene 1
Why Tax Increment F'lnancing.
■ Can be a potent tool for local government to
finance public improvements;
■ Promotes & facilitates development and
revitalization in communities;
■ Encourages job producing private investment
and development and economic stability;
o Expands tax base.
Ci .ty of Spokane Of.f ce of thc Mapot,
2/9/2005 Fcononuc Tae:vclopmcnt 2
. -
_ ; ;
Why Tax Increment Financing.
-As "communitY revitalizatian financing"
.
is:
■ Allows local government to "trap" the increased
property tax revenue resulting from the growth of the
assessed value or property w/in the increment area.
• Services debt issued to finance the public
improvements that are constructed to spur private
investment and development.
~
-
41~ * : .
t . N•4'"w="R.,City of Spc►kane Office of the ~4ayor,
2/9/2005 Economae iaec*elormcrit ~
Tax Increment Financing
HO W 1 T WORKS:
• The incremental property taxes generated from the
project are dedicated to pay for public improvements
related to the project;
• The sponsoring local governments designate the
"I ncrement District";
• Projected incremental taxes available are estimated
which identifies the scope of public improvements to
be funded.
Ciry o£ Srokanc Office of thc Mayor,
2f 9/2U05 E*.conc>mic Develorment
_ . , %
Tax Inc-rement Financing
Steps in Using TIF (in theory):
• Developers/Owners meet with taxing districts
(the City);
• Discuss feasibility of project and cost details
■ Assessment of "True and Fair Value"
■ Obtain taxing district approvals
City of Spokane Uffice Qf t:he Mayo.c,
2/9/2005 Fconomic Dcvelopment 5
Tax Increment Financing
Steps in Using TIF, cont'd
■ Public Hearing
■ Adopt Ordinance for the Increment area
■ Exceptions:*
a School & fire districts;
0 Counties;
ci Emergency medical services;
❑ Port or public utility districts;
* These do not participate and continue to receive 100% of the tax receipts from levies,
ie. the funds are NOT dedicated to or available for the project.
City of Spokanc Office oE cbe lvTa}=or., '
2/9/2005 r,eonorruc llevelopiiient G
Tax Increment Financing
~
Wh o May Form a District
■ Any combination of
local governments:
o Cities
o Towns
~
. ~
r
~ .'E. At-ea
o Counties
~ti!_ y ~ _ ° y^~ ~ rr2•
o Port Districts . .
Gty of Spc►kanr Office of the Mnyor.
-
Tax Increment Financing
~
Construction, N, , i
i ~ a,
~ti~' ~ ;Maintenance &
Improvement of.•
.
- •
■ Streets, roads
■ Water, sewer, drainage ~
Sidewalks, lighting
■ ~ ~ i '
■ Parking, terminals, docks
• Parks, recreational and ~E
entertainment facilities
Citp af Slc)kane C)ffire of thc Nf2ynr,
2 /<);''?1105 F.cc,nt,mic Devclopmrnt ti
Tax Increment Financing
Y
Also, helpspayfor:
. . ~
• Environmental Analysis
• Professional
Management
. r-.
Afty
-~a~ "~1.l~y 4~~v``r' f3~-~rYi' . . :F•
■ SecuritY' Maintenance
1fs~, _ ._J - - _ -
• Pianning, Promotion
• Historic Preservation -~j
~ D
~ ,V - -
y ~
~ ►
rl
_ . . ..rr , -
e:itv of SEx►kanr (Iffice of rhe Marnr,
r~~I?1('Ill ~ i
''ot I't , ifl( ~llllt~ 1 )C\"1'1,
Tax Increment Financing
Typical Prqiect Financing
• General Obligation Bonds backed by full faith &
credit of issuing government; or,
• Revenue Bonds backed by projected related
incremental revenues; or,
• Other security or financing to cover debt service
C:itp of Spukanc ()ffice of nce Nlavor,
2/9/2005 I-.conomic I )cvclormrnr 1
Tax Increment Financing
Additional Benefits of TIF
■ No impact on area ~
~
property owners ~
■ Benefits school districts ~
and districts by
increasing tax revenues
,
.
through property values
and overall economic
development
Caty of S~kanc (.-)f6u of the Mnyor,
; 0 15 f cr,nmiI),lncnr +
Tax Increment Financing
_
. _
Types ofproJ'ectsfrom TIF.*
, ~ ^ ~IIMI{~1lM11AOMIO{Rl~NU41
~i{ ~ ~
r r
. _ - - ~ - , ~
- - - _ ~ ' : . .
_ _"r~F1~w! . • -
i
' .
^ ~I
I ~ ~t 1~, ~ , y ~r • ~ _
~ III ,.a a
- ~I~J _I... A. .
1
(:itv of Spoknne ( )fficr (if thr i%1Av(rr.
',rp;`'(►(1? f=.~:~_~n~~niic I~c1-cl~~~~mcrst I,
Tax Increment Financing
■ TIF Limitations and Issues:
o Only about 37.5% of incremental taxes
available for public improvements, ie.
available after taxing districts.
u Issuance of G.O. Bonds contribute to debt
limits of sponsoring local government
o Results in severely restricting practical use to
very large projects or smaller deals with
limited infrastructure requirements
i Most effective in areas of significant under
valuation
Citv of Spokanc Ufficr nt chc INlayc,r,
`:'~),%?(►(Ij I.cnIU-mic Dcvd(~rmcnt 1 j
Tax Increment Financing
Limitations & Challenges (cont'd)
■ Very limited compared to most other States where revenue is
received from ALL property taxes collected in increment area
regardless entity or type, ~ WA only small portion is received.
• Previous attempts at State constitutional amendments in '73, '821 &
'85;
• With limits it difficult to fund meaningful proJ'ectable for improvements (infrastructuremust
have an $18M in increase for ea. $1 M avail )
• Must enter into agreements w/ local taxing authorities;
• TIF bonds apply against general debt capacity for entity issuing
bonds - risks to general fund;
• Existing LID and community renewal tools may be better funding
mechanism;
•"Future" infrastructure not addressed; only used to pay for
improvements identified at time of project.
Citp of Spokanr C7fficc of the Mayar,
2/9!20115 Ecununuc Drvcl()pmcnt
Tax Increment Financing
_ Thank you!!
_ ~
~ - ,
~
-
.
t
_4-:~~' i.. . ,..t". ,
w .._.sa• ~ :
,.w
. ~
_ ' .
, . _ , _ - _ _ . • . . .;Q-`~ ; • • r ; -
~ SIF; - • ~ A
~ • ~Y~ ~ ~ ,r'
.
. ~
Thc~mas A. Rcc.sc., NIA., A.SLA
Econom.ic Develormrrit AcJviso►r
OtYicc oC chc Mayor
. ~F~ '.~4
Cicv oC Spc~kane, ~~'A
-
(509)625-6282
crccsc(a'spokanccity.org ~ _ . _ - - - - -
( th n( .,~j)(flkanc ()Ifici• <,f thr M11aNnr,
~i~1!'1N15 l:c~~n~,rrn~ lic.~el~,~itncut 1=~
; CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 2/15/05 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ caisent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information 0 admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Cable Franchise Update
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Federal Cable Act of 1984
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
Ordinance establishing franchise fee approved 3/31/03; Memorandum of Understanding on
terms and conditions to participate in the regional cable advisory board approved 9116/03; Three
members appointed to Cable Advisory Board on 2124104; New rnember appointed to board on
218/05
BACKGROUND:
The Purpose of this agenda item is to update the Council on the franchise renewal process. In
addition AI Gilson, a Spokane Valley representative on the Spokane Regional Cable Advisory
Board, will give a presentation on the activities of the Board.
~ Cable franchises and the franchise renewal process are regulated by the federal government.
' The Cable Act of 1984 allows for both a forrnal and informal renewal process.
The City assumed the County's cable franchise agreement with Comcast upon incorporation.
The agreement expires on September 4, 2006.
There is a 36-month window on the formal renewal process. Comcast invoked the formal
proaess on September 30, 2003, but intends to concurrently negotiate under both the formal
and informal processes.
The City is currently in the ascertainment phase of the formal process by participating in the
Cable Advisory Board and by gathering citizen comments.
The purpose of this agenda item is to update the Council on the renewal process.
OPTIONS: NIA
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Provide feedback and direction to staff.
BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS: The City has budgeted $620,000 in cable franchise fee
revenue for 2005. $24,000 has been budgeted for the cable franchise renewal process.
STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Koudelka, Administrative Analyst
ATTACHMENTS
Cable Franchise Renewal Process Presentation
Spokane Valley
Comcast Cable
.
Franchise Renewal
Morgan Koudelka, Administrative Analyst February 15, 2005
;
Cable Francise Regulation
❑ Cable franchises and the cable franchise
renewal process are regulated by the Cable
Act of 1984 under section 626 (47 USC 546).
oThe Cable Act allows for both a formal and
informal renewal process.
February 15, 2005 2
Benefits to the community
❑ Public, educational, and govemirnental (PEG) access,
I equipment, facilities, and services.
❑ Institutional Networks (I-Nets) provided for intemal
use by governmental and educational institutions.
❑ Customer- service standards.
o Adherence to safety codes. ❑ System upgrades.
❑ Franchise fee revenues.
❑ Potential senior-citizen discounts.
February 15, 2005 3
.
'
Cable Franchise Facts
o Spokane Valley assumed the County's
existing cable franchise agreement with
Comcast.
❑ The agreement ex ~ires on September 4,
2006
❑ Valley' s cable franchise xenewal
Spokane
agreement will be independent of the
County's renewal agreement.
February 15, 2005 4
. What Can the City Regulate?
❑ Basic service tier rates according to FCC
benchmarks.
❑ Signal quality.
❑ Customer service standards.
❑ Agreed-upon or voluntarily contracted for
broad -categories of v'ldeo programming.
❑ Other negotiated terms of the franch'ise
agareexnent.
February 15, 2005 5
r .
, .
y~
~
Cable in Valley
Use Spokane ❑ Spokan.e Va.l.ley received $467,000 in franchise fees
fram. Comcast in 2003 and $657,000 in 2004
0 2003 Statistics .
Spokane Spokane Valley SV %
Population 197,400 82,005 42%
Households 86,608 34,878 40%
Cable Subscribers $ 60,000 $ 22,000 37%
Household Market Saturation 69% 63% 91 %
Franchise Fee Revenue at 5% $ 1,5831333 $ 6221585 39%
- Per Subscriber FF Revenue $ 26.39 $ 28.30 107%
Per Capita FF Revenue $ 8.02 $ 7.59 95%
February 15, 2005 6
•
CableFranchise Renewal Facts
❑ The franchise agreement can be renewed
through aformal or infor.nal process.
o Comcast has invoked the formal process, but
concuxrentlY negot.iates va.a the informal
process.
❑ There is a thirty-six month windoW on the
formal process,
February 15, 2005 7
~
Formal Process
❑ Ascertainment Phase
■ Past Perfor.mance Evaluation. (e.g. technical review)
■ Future Communi.ty Needs Assessm.en.t
❑ REquest for :Proposal
o The City must provide prom.pt public notice upon receipt of_
the pxoposal
❑ Negoti ations .
o.Q.ccept or issue a prelilninary den.ial within four months of
zeceiving the pr. oposal
❑ If apreliminary denial is :issued, the commencelnen.t of an
administrative proceeding is .r.equired
February 15, 2005 8
~
Formal Process Flowchaft
The formal process
may be invaked by
eilher tho cable
operator or the
franchising
Formal Process Invoaced authority.
Ascertainment Phase
1) Performance Evaluation
2) Needs Assessment
Formal Proposal
Submitted by Preliminary
Cabto Operator Denial
Franchise
Renewed Adminisirative Hearing
penfal Upheld Judicial Review De;nial Uphetd
February 15, 2005 9
`
• Adm'lnistrative Proceeding
o The administrative Proceeding will consider -
■ Franchise Compliance - Has Comcast substantially
com.plied with the materlal term.s of the existing franch.l se
an.d. with applicable law
■ Service Quality - Has the quality of Comcast's service
been reasonable in light of community needs
■ Ability - Does Comcast have the f.~nancial, legal, and
technical. ability to provide thc services, facilities, and
equipment set forth in the proposal
■ Reasonableness -Is Comcast's proposal reasonable to
meet the future cabl.e-related comrnunity needs and
interests, takin.g i.nto account the cost of ineeting such
needs an.d intErests
February 15, 2005 10
~
•
Recent Activity
❑ Sent letter to Comcast on April 28, 2004 indicating the
com.mencement of the ascertainment phase of the formal
zenewal process.
o Resolution adopted by Council on. May 25, 2004
❑Received requested inf_ormation from Comcast in June, 2004
■ Customer S ervi ce
■ System Quality
■ Spakane Valley subscriber information
❑ Appoin.ted three membe.r. s to thE Regional Cable Advisory
Board
❑Received Proposals for cable customer s-urvey
❑ Co-uncil and staff toured Comcast facility (January, 2005)
February 15, 2005 11
,
~
Take
Next Steps to
o Contin-ue the ascer. taxnment phase
■ Identify the future cable-related needs.
o Custome.r. Survey (Spring 2005)
❑ I`ocus Groups (Summer 2005)
a Citizen Comments (Spriiag 2005)
❑ Fublic Wearing (Summer 2005)
■ Assess cable operator's perfonnance.
o Tcchnical Evaluation (Summer 2005)
❑ :Proof-of-Performance R.eview (Summer 2005)
o :Franchise Compliance Review (Summer 2005)
o Develop an.d i.ssue a request for proposal(Fall 2005)
❑ Conduct NEgotiations (Spring 2006)
❑ Approve or deny franchi.se r.enewaa. (Summer 2046)
February 15, 2005 12
~ CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: February 15, 2005 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information Q admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Update on 2005 Contracts with Spokane County
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND: Spokane Valley has 15 service agreements with Spokane County. Many of
the city services are performed by the County through interlocal agreements. Most of these
interlocal agreements expired at the end of 2004, but the City and County agreed to extend the
contracts under existing terms pending finalization of the revised contract provisions. The City
and the County have been working on developing a model agreement to ufilize in the renewal of
these agreements for the year 2005.
~ This agenda item provides a status report on activities
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: N/A
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The city has budgeted $17,412,296 in 2005 for County
service agreements.
STAFF CONTACT: Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager; Morgan Koudelka, Administrative
Analyst ,
ATTACHMENTS
1. PowerPoint Presentation
~
Update on 2005 Service
Agreements with Spokane
Coun.ty
Morgan Koudelka, Administrative Analyst, February 15, 2005
i
Contracts Expiring 12/3 1. /2004
❑ Aninial Control
o District Court
❑ Data Processing
o Gciger
o Jury Sr•rviees
❑ Pre-Trial
• Prosecutor
o Probacion
a Public Ucfender
Contracis extended pending finalization nf updateci agreements
ITeWUSry 15.2lk5 205 Coriod Ulbdina 2
~
1
~
Contracts Automaticall.y Renewing
a Jail
❑ Law Enforcement
❑ Engineering Services
❑ Road Maintenance
❑ Hearing Examiner
Fc6runry 15, 295 2005Ccrdract Uptlet: l
2005 Budget Calculations Steps
i . Y1"D 2004 costs annualized
5-year annual grpvvth averabe for individual
Count}l services detel-lni.ned and applied to
step
3. Adjustments made f.o.r anticipated one-time
or unusual char.ges
a. Total of 2004, growth factor, an.d
adjustments is 2005 budget number
PChmay iG, 20.5 2A5 Cort7nrt UpaalO C
~
/
. 2
%
Model A.greement
o Two types
■ Pay-as-you-go
■ Settle-and-adjust
o Purpose is coilsistency
■ Methodology
■ Companents
❑ Easier to Administer
■ Salid fotuidation
❑ Clear interpret.ation for both parties
■ Reporting
■ Reconciliation
FeSwry 13, 2605 2005 CoMma urwm 5
Model Agr. eements :
"Settle-and-Adjust" Services
❑ One year duration with automatic renewal
❑ IZolling 180-day withdrawal notice
. ❑ Twelve equal monthly payments based on most
recent J'uly-June usage
o Actual costs detennined and reconcilcd after year-
end
o Capital costs amortized over useful life
o Dispute resolution through arbitration
o Quarterly usage report.s from County
Fchruaq• t5, 27L3 2D15 Gcrtina lfqfele E
3
/J
Model Agreements:
"Pay-as-you-go" Services
o One year duration with autornatic renewal
❑ Rolling 180-day withdrawal notice
oBilled manthly accordiniz to actual costs
o Capital costs amortized over useful ].if.e
o Dispute resolution tli.rough arbitratipn
❑ Monthly usage reports fronl County
FeWufly :5, ~5 20D5 COnifeq U{x1Ke
Next Steps
❑ Finalize model agreements and present to
Council for consideration
o Reconcile 2004 cantract costs
Fcluuuy 15, 2005 2ce5 CorCO9 LpRalc 8
~~~4
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
C!
Meeting Date: February 8, 2005 City Manager Sign-off:
ItEm: Check all that apply: ❑ consent old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ~ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE : PROPOSED STORMWATER REGULATIONS
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: City Ordinance 03-031 Establishment of Storm Drainage &
Surface Water Mgmt Utility, City Ordinance 03-032 Adopting by Reference, Spokane Co
Guidelines for Stormwater Mgmt as Interim Guidelines
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council Meetings on January 20, 2004, February 24,
2004, August 24, 2004
BACKGROUND:
On January 20, 2004, we presented an overview of stormwater management within the City.
Existing stormwater management requirements were discussed.
On February 24, 2004 staff conducted the first reading of revised draft regulations for
stormwater management. Additional work was needed on the regulations. Staff initiated a
consultant study to review existing swale design regulations. Staff and the consultants
J' presented the findings of the study at the August 24, 2004 Council meeting. Staff revised the
regulations based upon the consultant's recommendations.
The SEPA review was completed in September 2004. CTED completed their review of the
proposed regulations in October 2004. A public hearing was held at the December 9, 2004
Planning Commission meeting. The Commission had several comments that have been
incorporated into the ordinance. The Commission reviewed the changes on January 13, 2005
and recommended adoption of the proposed regulations.
This administrative report updates Council on the content of the proposed regulations.
Because it has been almost a year since the initial first ordinance reading, and because there
have been extensive changes, it has been recommended to have a new first reading.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Council Consensus to proceed to ordinance first
reading
BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS: None
STAFF CONTACT: John Hohman, P.E.
~
ATTACHMENTS Stormwater Management Regulations PowerPoint
D1ZAF7'
cir>> Or sroKa,~~T vALi..rv
SPOItAV'F COUNTY, R'ASATiNGTU\'
ORDINANCF \TO. US-
AN OTtllINANCE OF TliE C1Tl' QF SYOIC.ANE VALLEY, WASHING I'ON
ESTAI3LISHING SECTIQN 10.09.08 STORMWATER NL4NACEMT\TT
ItEGITL:ATIQ\°S nF THE SPUKAaNE VALLEY UNIFQRIVT DEVEL,(SPMtNT COllE,
RTFFALTNG RECULATIQNS IN CUNF'LICT, PROVMLNG FOR SEVE12A13ILiTY
AND EFI+EC'TIVT DATE.
VVHElaAS, Con~ress enacted the Safe Driiiking WaYer Act (SDV►~~1) to protect public healdi by
regulating the nation's drinking water supply. The Act authoriced the Eiivironmental l'rotection Ageney
(EP.4) to protcct surface and groundwater supplies.
V4'HI.RrAS, uncler the SllWA, F-PA determined that the Spokane Valley-Rathclrum 1'rairie
Aquifer was the snle or principtil souree of drinking water in this region (Sole Source ,Aquifer or SSA).
This determination meant that no fcdertil financial assistance may be used in this region for any projes;t
which E1'A detennities may contantinate the aquifcr resulting in signiftcant hazards to public health or the
environment.
R'PEREAS, the SDWA also established the Underground injection Control (U[C) Prqgram to
provide safeguarcts for underground sourees of clrinlcing water. GPA delegatecl i,1TC auehority to the
Washington llepartment of rcology (Ec:nlogy).
, WITERFAS, EPA and Ecology have determined that public and private cons[ruction projects
musc meet groundwater protection standards and have recognized the Spokane County Guictelines for
StormwaCer Management as such standards.
«'AE1UAS; through Ordinance No.03-32 the City of Spokane Valley adopted the Spokitne
County Guidelines for Stormwater Mana~cment as amended, as the interim desi~m guidelines for
storinwater management with in the City nf Spokane Valley;
VVfiEREAS, in order to provide for the continuccl management and conh-ol of stormwater within
the City it is necessary to develop regulations that re•late co the construction and maintenance of
storm«<ater facilities widiin the City; and
V1rI3EI2Er1S; the nurpose of this ordinance is to provide authority far 5tormwater review,
development and cbntrol with respect to the use of Iamc1, the construction and maintenance of storrmvater
facilities on public znd private property, the unlawfiil discharae of pollutants inco a stormwater faciliry;
.inci other matters properly related thereto;
NQW THERE I'ORE, the City Council of the City or 5pokane Valley, Washington do ordain as
foIIQw$:
Scction 1. Section 10.09.08 of the Spokane Valley UniForm Development Code is hereby
es[ablished to re.ad as follows:
"Section_ 10.09.08 Stormwater Mana=ement Reaulations
Sectioo 10.09.08.01 Fincling ancl Purpose. Tlte increased flow of surface water from the use and
development of real property wichin the City rnust be managed to protect persons, property, and the
cnvironment. Stonnwater facilities are a coinmon feature of urban development which must be
Stonmwater Ordinance 05-_ 1'3ge I of 7
DRAF-T
constructed ailcl maintained when property is devcloped or redeveloped «<ithin a geographic area. The
Ciry shall implement pnlicies and procedures to:
~
(1) Minimize the degradation of water quality in surface and groundwatcr;
(2) Tteduce the impact from increasecf surface water flow: erosion and sedimentation
caused by the developmcnt of property;
(3) Promo[e site planning and land developmenl practices that arc consistent with the
topographical and hydrological conditions; and
(4) Maintain and protect public and private propcrty that is used and dedicated for
storniwater management.
Section 10.09.0$.02. Uefinitions. The following definitions shall apply throughout this section:
A. "Best management practices (BVIP)" means currcntly available, feasible and gencrally
tiecepted t:echniques or practices that mitigate the adverse impact fi-om the uncontrolled
stormwater on the environmenC, surrounding Properties ancl infra„structure.
B. "City• PropErty" mcans rcal property owned by the City which may include easements,
dedications ancl ri~lits-of-way.
C. "City Standards° means the "Spokane County Guidelines for Stonnwater
Management" and other standards developed or recognizecl by tihe Director that relate to
best management practices, thrrshold requirements for a site drainage plan, cxcmptions,
permitking processes forms and such other matters for the administration of storinwater
control.
D. "Director" means the City Direetor of Public Worl:s as aulhorized by the City
~
Mana3er.
E. "Erosion" means the disturbance of land or transportation of soil or ather native
materials by running wacer, wind, ice or other geological agents.
F. "Follution GeneraCing Impervious Surface (PGTS)" means surfaces t;hat are subject tn
vehieular use, industrial activities, or storage of erodible or leachable materials that
reccive clircct rainfall, or run-on or blow-in rainfall. Metal roofs are PG1S unless coated
with an itierl, non-leachable material. Roofs that are subject to venting of canmeecial or
industrial pollutants are also considered PGTS. A surface, wllether pavcd or not, shall be
considered PGIS 'if it l5 CC gllI1PIy used by motor vehicles. The following are considered
regularly-u5e:d surfaces: roads, graveled and/or paved road shoulders, bike lanes within
the h•aveled lane of a roadway, driveways, parking IUts, unfenced fire lanes, vehicular
storagc yards, and airport runways.
G. "Site.[7rainage Plan" rncans a plan nrepared by a professional engineer licensetl in the
State of Washington that identifies the stormwater control area, srormwater facilities and
other measures reasonably require;tl by the Direccor. The plan shall contain analysis and
recommendations based upon the "City S1andards"
H"Staiidard Soils" ilieans soils comprised ofthe Niatural f'tesources Conser-vation pistrict
groups: Garrison, Springdale, Bonner, and Hagen.
L"Stonn,.aater" mcans thaf portion of precipitation or snow melt that has not naturally
percolat:ed into the ground or othemvise evaporated, but is contained, t:ransporleci or
flowing above ground thrnugh streets, swales, channels; pipes, artificial or natural
surfaces,
~
Stormwater Qrdinance OS-_ E'aee 2 of 7
DRAF"I*.
J. "Stonnwater Facility" means the draina~e system includin~, but nnt limited to, clr~~well,
channeL inlet, eurb drop, swale, diteh, cletention; retention, and/or infiltration Faciliry
de.sioned to contain and conerol stormwater.
K. "Swale" means a constructed depression for the treattnent tincl disposal of stormwater
runoff. The swale sMall bc clesigned by an engineer licensecl in the state of Washingt4n.
L. "Threshold Requirements" means the level of development, volume, or pealc flow of
scormwater that must be controlled.
M. "PErformance. Surety" means a financial guarantee ehat infi-astructure reyuired for a
project Nvill b-e cdnstructed and cercifetl according to the accepted plans and
specifications and all applicable standards.
N. "Warranty Surety" means a financial guarantee against defects in the construction of
aII required infrastructure for a project.
Secliun 10.09.08.03. Reeulateci Activities. 'No person on any public or private real property locacecl
within the. Ciry, shall engage in the following regulated activities wiihctut first qbtaitiiita stormwater
control approval from the City. The regulated activities for development are:
(1) Grijding of land in excess of 500 cubic yards so as to require environmental review
pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act;
(2) Construction of, or addition to, a builtling (exeept a single-family or duplex residence)
or placement of impervious surfaces that exceed 5,000 syuare feet; and
(3) `I°he subdivision, short subdivision and binding site plan process as defned in RCW
Chapter 55.17 and City qrdinance.
Section 10.09.08.04. Authority t4 clevelnp and administer stanctards. 1"he Director shall develop snd
atlm'►nister City Standards that relate to best managcment practices and the threshold requiremeiits for the
development of stormwater control facilitics. The Director is further authorized to develop palicies that
relaie to che subrnissioii and mocliFcation of stonnwater, erosian and sediment control plans.
Requirements and pe.rfqnnance standards that iiiclude best management praccices shall be dcsigned
to cnntrol and conuiin stormwater, reduce soil erosion and sedimentation through the use of temporaiy
and permanent pi•actices and facilities. The requiremenrs shal] be designed to permit flexibility in the
choice of stormwater erosion and sediment cdntrol methods that meet the specific cireumstances of each
site and intended use.
A. fteview Process
Following submietal of a request to engage in a regulated activity, the Dircctor shall review thc
proposed regulated itctivity including any plans or other submitied material. Thc Director shall deten-nine
whetlier t.he regulated activity is exempt froili review based upon thc threshold requirements, or
alternatively, whether Che regiilated activity complies with the staridards, specifications and requirements
CQt1131t1GCJ in the City standards. Tlie Director may require the submission of additional material and/or
analysis to allo,%v thc proponent tn demonstratc eompliance with Ciry Suuidards.
Sectinn 10.09.08A5. Conditions of Approval. The UirectQr is authorized to impose development
reyuirements or conditions of approval for the resulated activities. The stornlwater requirements or
ednditions may be placed on the subdivisinn, binding site plan, issued permit, or a recorcled maintenance
covenant and agreement may bc placed upon a yarcel or lot where drainagc facilities will be cteveloped.
Conditions of approval shall be basecl on the City Stsndarcls, the preliminary Site 17rsinage Plan,
enaineerine rcports ar other relevant data that promotes stormwater cantrol, protection of adjacent
propertie.s, utilities or other storrnwater facilities, slope stabilization and the environrnent.
Storrritvatr.r Ordinance OS-_ I?aoe 3 of 7
DRAFT
'i'he rccorded covenant and agreement shall be in substantially the following foi•m.
1. " Btryer is pirrchasirlg frona Seller Cot Block irr the final plat of .
recarded in the recurds c,f the SfJUIiUIJE COi1111), A1lCIllO!' (J!J
the _ clay o
f, 200_, ut voluine of PIaLS, Page
silriated in the Cirv of Spokcrrie Valley, S'pokurre C'ounty, FVaslrirrgton.
2. Itr uccordcrnce ►villr !he finul pl( a! und the Co►Tditrons of Approvullherevf, the above desc.ribed
!ni cnntairzs an eusenaent for a drnrnage stivale into ►vhich stornawater flo►vs.fi•olnpuved
surfaees tinithirr the plal arrd.f'ram rciaclway aizcl sidEwalks acljueerit to the pla1.
3. The clrai,iuge swule hus beei7 cotislrtietec1, soddeil wirh brYUSS', aitd coyirtecled lo a sprinkler
irrigation system.
4. Tlte Parties de.rire tnprnvlde for t6ie perpetual mnintertance, repair und replacement of tlie
druinage swcrle crrtd its irriguliun eyslem.
NObV, TNE, R-EFpRE, in cnnsiderution of the mutual covenunls arrd catrdrtiotrs corltaiired hereirl
at1d iIre recitals a•[ated ubvve, !he Parcies agree as follaws:
1. 13irver crgrees ta mainlain the druinuge stivale vtz the lot described above hy mo►vi►rg,
fertilizifig rnrd waterirrg the grass in the stivale to keej.) the grcrss heulrhy and the swale well-
kept in appearartce.
2. Btryer tnrderstarid.s that the drainage .sivale is irrigated by a sprinkler syscenr tivhich is
cvnnected to the hause carstrircced orr the Lut described above, and that Buyer will be
providing cinc'1 pcrying for wuter 1o irrigate the drainagc sivale. bn addition Btdyer ugrees co
k.eep 17ie draitrage s►wale rrrigation system i►t good repair ai7d functional for ils irrterrded
purnose_
i
3. Buyer agrees to rentove litter aird debris from the drainage sw(ile und further agrees not to ~
crller l1rc, shcrpe 4r gracle uf the clruinugc r►vule nvrpluce any object, structure, or vehicle
within the drainage swale.
=1. Tlre Cit), of S'pofunte Volley ivill clemi mid repair arry drywells, tnlets, ui7d pipes lhcrt recei>>e
r:rnofffro»r public right of way utul corjot•m to City access slcmdard.s.
5. Buyer w7derstarids urrd agrees rhat if the druinage swcrle is irot kept urrd niainrailaed ur
providerl hereiii, the Citv oJSpokane Valley ma)+ undertake saicl »raintenrrirce at7d repair arid
cirarge Buyer for its laGor attd iiiairttetrarrce.
G. The Agreement shall riui with the land in perpenuity unless revoked by the Ciry of Spnkune
Vallev. "
The City may also enter into a development agreement with the person having oNvnership or control
of the real properey that is subject to chis Ordinance. Such development agreement shall bc cntered into
pursuant co RCW 36.70B.170, et. sec.
Section I0.(}9.08.06. 17esign Elements. [7rainage facilities within single-family or two-family
residential subdivisi4ns shall be designed as follows:
(I) Contiriuous swales running the length of the strcet located benveen the curb and si(lewalk.
These swales shall be within City right-of-wa}, or within a border easement granted tn the
City, or;
(2) Gonsolidated ponds or swales that are located an a separate tract or lot owned by a
homeowners assoeiacion or dedieated to the City. Ccrosolidatecl ponds or swales are
acccptable on private commercial developments.
Stormwater Ordinance OS-_ page 4 of 7
nrAFT
Scction 10.09.08.07. Design vtethod. Drainage ponds and Swalcs located in Garrison ar nther
~ j stancl.ird snils shall use the equat.ion below to detei-inine the size of the facility:
, V = 1 133 A, where
V= Volume of swale (cubic feet)
A= l'ollution generation impervious surface (acres)
All swale designs within the City shall specitji the usc of an engineered treatment soil. This soil shall be
plaeecl at a minimum thickness ofsix inches behween the native soil and the soc! layer.
Engineers designing drainage facilitics located in non-standard soils must submit a design deviation in
accordAnce witli Section 9.08.0$ and receive approval from Ihe Director prior to utilizing the above
methad in their design. Geotechnical justificatipn will be requirc;d.
Section 10.09.08.08. Deviations and Appeals
1. AirthoriCV. The Director may grant a devialion from the requirements of t.his Ordinance
or City Standards. In g7anting any deviation, the Director may prescribe conditions that
are deemed necessary or desirable for the public interest.
2. Deviation Criteria. No deviation shall be granted unless the. anplicant demonstrates, to
the satisfaction of the i7irector, the followin~:
A. Deviations are Uased upon sound engineering principles, bcst management practices
and are not inconsistent with the public interest in stormwater control and environmental
protection; and
B. The ganting of the deviation will not be unduly detrimental or injurious to other
propcrties in the vicinity and downsd•eam.
C. The proposed dcviaCion does not conflict with or modify a condition of approval.
D. Deviations mect rcquirements fnr safety, function, appearant;e, and maintainahilit:y.
3. Prior approval: Any de.viation shall be approved prior to acceptance of residential and
commercial construction plans and issuance of any building, approach, or site woric
permits.
4. Right nf appeal: All actioils of the Director in ilhe administration and enforcement of this
ch3pter shal) be final and conclusive, unlc5s within 15 days frotn ttotice of the Director's
aelion, the applicant or an aggrieved party Gles a notice of appeal with the Hearing
Eaaminer.
Section 10.09.08.09. Storrmvater Facility Construction and Ceri:ification. .All stonnwater
facilities shall bc completed amd certified by the proronent's engineer prior to any tinal plat; short
plat, binding site plan; or the issuance of a permanent Certificate of pecupancy or final inspection
for any associated building. At dle discretion of the iairector, tt test of the faciliCy may be
pert'ormccf to ciemonstrate adequate perf'orma»ee. The test shall be performeci in the presenee oT
Public Works personnel.
Acceptance of performance sureties in lieu of completed improvements shall be pennirted only when
completion of iinprovements prior to final land actioti or permanenc Certific•ate of Occupancy is
impractical (i.e., due to construction season delays or other f'actors beyond the proponent's control).
~__[n the event that a perfnrm<<nce surety is ac.cepted by the Director, the prononent will completc the
following measures prior to the release of the surety:
Stonmvater Ordinance OS-- Pare 5 of 7
DR.AF'I'
l. All aspects of the draina5c facility, including landscaping, irrigation, and establishment of
specified vegetation, shall be eompleted in accordance wilh the riccepted plans on file with the
City. The praponent's engineer shall certify the improvements and request an oversight
inspection from f'ublic Works personnel.
2. An eaception may be grantcd for single-family or t'wo-family residential subdivisions where
the completion of lhe swales is not practical until such time as the dwellings are construeted. The
proponent shall rough grade the swales to the required volume and install all clrywells, inlets, curb
drops and other structures in accordance with the acccptccl plans on file with the City. Erosion
control measures shall he implemented to protcct the installed drainage structures and to prevent
erosion anc!!or failure of the swale sicle slopes. The completion of the landscapino, irrigation, and
est:ablishment of specified vegetation shall be required prior to issuance of the permanent
Certificate of Occupancy or final inspection for any associated dwelling.
A warranty surety shall be submitted to the Ciey upon successful completion and certific;ation of all public
irnprnvements to ?uarantee against defects in construction. The ~+~arranry surety will be. for a period of
Cwro (2) years from the date the facility is accepted by the City.
Seclion 10.09A8.10. Inspection.
The Director is authorized Co fclcl insnect; as appropriate, streeY, building site, arld drainage
construction to verify conformancc with City standards ancf the conditions of approval.
Sectian 10.09A$.11. Prorerty Owner Responsibilities.
A. 7°he preperty owner shall comply with provisions of this section and City standards. The
prnperty owncr shall be responsible for rcpair, restoration, and perpetual mdintenance of the stqrmwater
facility installed on private property and any portion of the swale situated in a public right-of=way adjacent
to their respec:tive pronerties. For purposes of this chapter, "repair aiid restoration" shall mean con:forming
the stormwater facility to the plans on file widi the City. This respoosibility to repair, restore and maintain
shall be imposed without reaard to any fault or wrongful intention on the part Af the property owner.
"Maintenanee" means preservation of the orisinal area, volume, configuration and Funetion of thc
storm,water f'acility as described in lhc plans. "Maintenance" also includes mowing, irrigating, and
replacing when necessary, the lawm turf within tlie swales. The property owmers within single-family aiid
two-family residential subdivisians are not responsible for maintenance of structures such as clrywells,
inlets; ancl pipes that receive runoff frpm publie right of way aiid confonn to City access standards. The City
of Spokane Valley will maintain these structures upon acceptance of the public infrastructure.
B. The properl'y owner is responsible for keeping open the draiiiage and stoi7nwater easements
on their property. If a drainage or slormwater easement is unlawfully encroached upon or the function of a
desianated drainage or stormwater easement is rcduced, the property owner is responsible for removing
thc encroachment nr detrimcnt.
C. The prpperty owner is responsible for keeping open maintenance access easement~5 serving
drainage facilities aiid drainage easements.
U. '1'he Property owner shall not place or permit, aiid shall immediatel_y remove; vehicles,
equipment, objet;fs, rcfuse, garbage or litier &om tlie Stormwater Facility.
Seclion 10.09.0$.12. 1'ublic Drainage Facilities. It shall be unlaNv-ful for any per,on to throw,
clrain, pour or otherwise discharge unauthorized waters or other liquids onto City property, rights-of-wa_y,
or border ea,sements, without written permission of Che Director. For purposes of this chapter,
wiauthorized waters include, but are not limitecl to:
(a) Groundwater from springs or other natural or arcificial sources, foundation drains,
sump pumns, aiid otlier means nF cfiseharging groundwater to the surface; (b) Surface , fwater containing sediment; (c) Discharges fi-om swimming pools, hot tubs, cle[entiun or
Stormwater Ordinance 05-_ Page 6 of 7
DIZAFT
evaporation ppncls; (cf) 4Vater discliargect from the cleaning of containers or equipnient
~ used in layina, cutting, or proccssing eoncrete and mortar and the water used in such
processes; (e) Water diseh.irgecl from the cleaning of equipinent or containers holciin3
paint solvents or similar contaminant,S; and (f) Other water posing a safety hazard in the
travel way or that could reduee lhe eiT'ectiveness of stormwater control and treatment
facilities.
Section 10.09.08.13. Failure to Complv - Nuisance.
The following is declarecl t:o be unlawful and a public niiisance:
(a) The placement, consh-uction, or installation of any strueture within, or d1e
connection to, a public Stonmvater Faeility without written permission of the
Director; or
(b) The discharge of stormwater to a public Stormwater Facility without
permission of the Direetor; or
(c) The failure to cnnstruct or maintain the Storniwater Faeility as requircd in the
pennit or site drainage plan; or
(d) The placeme,nt or allowing the placement of vellicles, equipmenC, objects,
refuse, garbage; or litter within the stoniiwater facility.
Section 9.08 is subjecl: lo the provisions of Seclion 10.01.20: of thc SpUkane Valley Uniform
f)evelopment Code. For purpascs of chis section "Director" shall be the Director of Public Works.
Secfion 2. IZepealer. Provisions of the Spokane Countv Guidelines for Stormwater Management in
conflict are hcrcbv repEaled. .
Secdan 3. SeverabilitY. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of dlis ordinance shall be held to
be invalid or unconstitutiontil by a cowrt of competent jurisdiction, sueh invalidity or unconsiitutionality
shall not affeet the validity or constitutionality of any other seetion, sentence, clause or phrase of this
Ordinance.
Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after cfate of
publicittinn of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the off cial newspaper of the City.
FASSEU by the Cit_y Council this aay of , 2005.
A"]"C'EST: Mayor, Diaiia Wilhite
City Clerk; Christine Bainbridge
AI'PRQVE D AS 7 U F'ORM.:
Deput}= City Atlorney, Cary Driskell
Date of 1'ublicatian:
Cffective pate:
Siorn»vater prdinance 05- Paee 7 of 7
~
0
. Fl
Cl'I'16]Zane
,;*oOValley
Stormwater Management
Regulations
February 8, 2005
Background
❑ Spokane Valley does not have a
comprehensive stor.n draion system
❑ Stormwater runoff flows into drywells and
swales
Valley soils are typically porous which allows
quick infiltration
o Concem for contamination of the aquifer
which supplie s our drinking water
.
i
. TYplca Drywell Installation
~ F
/y~~ o .r ~ f ,~;~s~
iL
1 'r. ~ ~ L~-+ ~y~,~'k
. 't 2~L~ ~y;• `~t - • _ r-'~~,~, ,a.
~1.. - ~
~ _l . ,~_-J~. ' ~ 'h. ~ z~"~
Typl*cal Swale
.
t
4
~ --11'•::! . : '1 ;
y .
, . -
1
.
Environmental Regulations
a City must comply with State and Federal
stormwater requirements related to the Safe
Drinking Water Act and the Clean Water Act
■ Underground Injection Control
■ Stormwater Management Manual for Eastern
Washington
- - - - - - - - - - -
Design Standards
o City has adopted the Spokane County
G-uidelines for Stormwater Management
o City, County, and Spokane are currentl
y
working on a Regional Stormwater Design
Manual based upon Ecology's manual-
Completion in late 2005
❑ City has an immediate need for several
amendments to the current standards
i
Purpose
o Minimize the degradation of water quality in surface and
groLindwater
o Reduce the impact of increased surface water flow,
erosion, and sedimentation caused by development
o Promote site planniilg and development practices that are
consistent with the topographical and hydrological
conditions
a Maintain and protect publ ic and private property that is
used and dedicated for stormwater management
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ . - 1
Regulated Activities - Thresholds
❑ Grading in excess of 500 cubic yards
o Construction of ilnpervious surfaces that
exceeds 5,000 square feet
o Subdivisions,, short subdivisions, biding site
plans
i
Authority
❑ Clar'lfies City's Authority for developing
standards, reviewing developments, and
preparing conditions of approval
A
Design Amendments
❑ Creates standard design for swales that would
eliminate current problems
❑ Allows the use of a new swale design lnethod created
by a consultant teatn for the City based upon the
Eastern Washington Stormwater Manual
o Provisions for Design Deviations
i - Example of Proposed Standard
Residential Swale Design
' ~ ► ~
~
- -
;
,
~
-
_ rF
.
v~
~ ~ssti!
-1
Example of Existing Swale
r.j. -
,
i'
C;.- - _ , ; ~ ,.~'J_ _ . _
_ - ~
~
. ' - -
. ~ i
, . - ± ~ - ,r . ~y . _ _ , ~„r•`"' ~ - . -
1: 14 11'
,
Construction Requirements
o All stormwater facilities shall be completed and certified
prior to final plat or issuance of a permanent Certificate of
Occupancy
❑ Eliminates cumbersame County construction process
o Sureties only allowed when completion is impractical
such as weather or other tactors beyond the proponent's
contro 1
a Reyuires warranties for public improvements
i - -L
Examples o Exlsting Problems
~
,
- - - - ~
~ ('~i.
~~►.k.~
'r~ i' ~
~ ~ ~ _ t . s.r.~ .•2•
-
i
I
Property Owner Responsibilities
o Defines repair, restoration, and perpetual
maintenance
a Keeping drainage easemellts open
o Keeping maintenance access open
❑ Shall not place or dump vehicles, equipment,
refuse, garbage, or litter in stormwater
facilities
Public Drainage Facilities
o Prohibits the discharge of contaminates or
other unauthorized liquids
❑ Defines lack of compliance as a nuisance.
a Standard SVUDC Enforcement and Penalti*es
~ - - -
•
Adoption Process Summary
❑ SEPA completed in September 2004
❑ CTED review completed October 2004
a Draft Ordinance provided to engineering community
for review in December 2004
❑ Public Hearing held at the December 9, 2004
Planning Comiiiission Meeting.
❑ Planning Commission. reviewed regulations on
December 9, 2004 and January 13, 2005.
o Planning Commission recommends adoption of
regulations
• ^
Questions?
~
;
~
. T . '
'r <~=~t. i -1 .
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
~
Meeting Date: February 15, 2005 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
19 information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Administrative Report. Hazard Mitigation Plan.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: 44 CFR 201
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None.
BACKGROUND: In 2000, the U.S. Congress passed legislation requiring the development of
Hazard Mitigation Plan by each state and local government jurisdiction before November 1,
2004, as a condition of receiving disaster mitigation funding. The failure of citieslcounties across
the nation to plan for flood mitigation within existing emergency management plans provided
irnpetus for the legislation The Spokane County Division of Emergency Management has
developed a draft for submittal, following a template developed by the state.
The legislation requires the development of a Hazard Inventory and Vulnerability Analysis
(HIVA) to provide the basis for the Plan itself, as well as a proactive citizen participation
element. Adoption of the Plan provides a commitment to hazard reduction and the basis for
state technical assistance. Spokane Valley's status as a contracf city will require the active
participation of a number of agencies and service providers in the development of the Plan. The
Plan will be coordinated with that of Spokane County.
A preliminary HIVA has been developed. Staff anticipates completing a preliminary draft of the
~ % Plan for circulation to agencies and service providers by the end of February 2005. Assuming
that agency/provider review can be completed not later than March 30, 2005, the draft will be
updated and a public hearing scheduled before the Planning Commission during the month of
April. The recommendation of the Planning Commission will be forwarded to City Council for
approval of the Ptan.
OPTIONS: Not applicable.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Information only. No action required. .
BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS: Not applicable.
STAFF CONTACT: Marina Sukup, AICP, Comrnunity Development Director
ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint Presentation
S06koaane
Valley
40 H
~
a~,z~a~~r~ .ii ~ .i~ g at Ioni ~ ~
r a~~n~
~ ,
T.M
rotl ':-01-~``~ ro
. ~
Community Development Department
11'
.f..I
Purpose
• Brief City Council on the requirements for a
Hazard Mitigation Plan pursuant to 44 CFR
201.6
What is a ~ •sas er"?
.
• Definition:
An unforeseen and often sudden event that causes
great damage, destruction and human suffering.
Though often caused by nature, disasters can have
human origins. Wars and civil disturbances that destroy
homelands and displace people are included among
the causes of disasters. 4ther causes can be: building
collapse, blizzard, drought, epidemic, earthquake,
explosion, fire, flood, hazardous material or
transportation incident (such as a chemical spifl),
hurricane, nuclear incident, tornado, or volcano
,
Background
• The Spokane Valley Hazard Mitigation Plan establishes
a commitment to reduce risks from natural hazards
• Identifies resources for reducing hazards
• Provides the basis for State technical assistance and
funding priorities
• All potential applicants for federal disaster mitigation
assistance must have an approved hazard mitigation
plan in accardance with 44 CFR 201.6
• Requirements include Hazard Inventory & Vulnerability
Anafysis, Strategic Plan and citizen participation
• Homeland Security has issued a Nafional lncident
IVlanagement S.ystem outline to assist in the
~ r
Hazard Inventory & Vulnerability
Analysis (HIVA)
• Risk assessment providing identifying and establishing
priorities for proposed mitigation strategies
• Analysis of past events and an assessment of the
probability of future events
• The effect of such an event on the community
• Inventory of structures and facilities at risk
• Dollar estimate of potential damage
• Description of land uses & development trends so
mitigation options are considered in future land use
decisions
Mitigation Plan
• Strategies for reducing future losses
• Evaluating tools to reduce risks
• Growth Management Act
• Critical Area Ordinances
• Capital Improvement Pian
• Comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions and
projects being considered
• Action Plan establishing priorities, implementation and
administration
• Schedule for monitoring, evaluating, and updating the
mifiigation plan within a five-year cycle
• Process for incorporating hazard mitigation into other
planning activifiies
Requirements
• Citizen Participation in Plan development
• As a contract city, the active participation of
potentially affected service providers is
required
• Utilities
• Fire Districts
• School Districts
o County DEM
o Health DistrictlSCAPCA
~
How Does this Work.
Disaster
Event TPre-Disaster Post- Event
Mitigation Recovery ~
_ , .
~ i
~
. I •1 ' ' ~ - /
.
Evaluation & ~
, ~ ' ' ' - ~;:r• ~
. • ~ ~ i , ~y~` ~
Monitoring
-
.
2002 City/County 2004 Spokane
Combined Valley Event Discussion Topic
Ranking" Ranking
13.18 15.0 Winter Storm Severe Weather
T~ 12.76 15.0 Power Failure Severe Weather/Fire
v 10_34 10.0 Urban Fire Fire
9 81 8.0 Wildfire Severe Weather/Fire
10.46 8.0 Terrorism Terrorism/Civil Disorder
8.27 8.0 Transportation (air-rail) HazMat/Local Hazards
~ 8.25 8.0 HAZ Facility HazMaULocal Haiards
~ 7.74 8.0 HAZ Transportation HazMaULocal Hazards
~ 7.67 6.0 Civil Disorder TerrorismlCivil Disorder
~ 5.26 6.0 Radiological/Transport HazMat/Local Hazard
~ 7.54 5.0 Volcano Seismic
~ 6.20 5.0 Flood/Flash Flood Flood
L. 5.29 4.0 Dam Failure Flood
~ 5.59 30 Tornado Severe Weather
N 8.80 2.0 Earthquake Seismic
m 3.79 2.0 Landslide Seismic
= 5.25 2,0 Drought Reg,onal Response
5.17 2.0 Radiological/Facility Regionai Response
4.67 0.0 Subsidence
2.65 0.0 HurricanelT'ropical Storm
2.2 -t ~ 0.0 Avalanche
-i bur~arni
-qq
Ranking the Hazards
• Severity of the event
• Historical perspective
• Persons/property affected
• Damage to infrastructure
• Frequency or probability of occurrence
, _ _
^ E ~ ~ ~ , • ' r -
ould tornha 6o gpi r * Q A v s -
!
, ed • r s plains I year!
ti
~
I • I • 1 I , si'ren I d d I a g priority?
t
Categories
• Severe Weather • Fire
• Terrorism/Civil Disorder • Seismic
• Hazardous Material • Flood
• Local Hazard
M■ a ■
i i a io n Measures
• Pre-disaster mitigation
• Event Response • Post- event mitigation
i
Next Steps
• Complete draft HIVA January 1, 2005
. Circulate to service providers March 15, 2005
• Draft Plan March 30, 2005
• Submit to Spokane County DEM March 30,
2005
• Public Hearing before Planning Commission
• Council adoption by Resolution
,
_ 'ti+.f- r r, . . a -
_
'I - - ~
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
v Meeting Date: February 15, 2005 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business
❑ public hearing
10 information 0 admin. report ❑ pending legislafion
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Administrative ReQOrt - An ordinance amending the provisions of the
Right-of-Way Vacation Requirements.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: City Council adoption of Ordinance No. 04-002
(Street Vacations) in January 2004. The ordinance was c4dified in Title 10 Article III of the
Spokane Valley Code of Ordinances.
BACKGROUND: The City has processed four street vacation requests since Ordinance 04-042
was adopted. As a result of questions which arose during these actions, several amendments
should be cansidered:
1. City signatures on survey documents are unnecessary on documents prepared by a
licensed Washington Surveyor; .
2. Survey of properties outside the area of the actual vacation add additional cost to the
survey without commensurate benefit to the petitioner;
3. Monuments provide control points for property owners, as well as establishing
monuments in areas where monuments have been destroyed as a result of past street
construction activities;
4. Providing the governing body with necessary findings by the hearing body who receive
public testimony establishes the basis for legislative findings;
5. Requiring documentation of the transfer of title by means of a quit claim deed formalizes
the transfer to abutting owners; and
6. The repeal of the existing code references and the establishment of a new section
renumbered as part of the Spokane Valley Uniform Development Code. (Title 10 of the
Spokane Municipal Code)
A Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) was issued on January 20, 2005, and the proposed
ordinance distributed to CTED and adjacent jurisdictions. The appeal period expires on
February 18, 2005. No final action of the proposal will be scheduled prior to March 22, 2005. A
public hearing before the Planning Commission is scheduled for February 24, 2005.
OPTIONS: Provide staff with direction.
RECOMMENDATION: Council consensus to move forward with a first reading.
STAFF CONTACT: Marina Sukup, AICP, Commun'rty Development Director
Cary Driskell, Deputy City Attorney
) ATTACHMENTS: Draft Ordinance
CITY OF SPQKANE VALI..EY,
SVOKANF COUNTI' WAS1-IING"I"ON
ORDWANCE Nd. OS-
A1' ORD1\'ANCE OF THE Cl°I"Y OF SI'OKANE VALL.EY, 1vASl-IING'I'O\', ESTAI3[.ISI-I1NG
SECTION 10.09.04 OP THE SPOICANE UNIFOR~VI DEVELOPMENT COUE nND REPEALING °I'HE
PROV[SIO\'S OF SPOICANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODF, ARTICLE 111 R1GHT-OF-WAY
VACATION 10.05.220 IZELAI'ING TO THE REGULA`1`IONS FOR THE VACA7`ION Or PU[3LIC
STRrrT RIGHTS-OP-WAY.
VIq-IrR.rAS, RCW 35A.47.020 provides stacutory authority for cities [o vaeate public rights-of-way;
VIrHEREAS, kCW 35.79 provides a general prncedural framework for cities to vacate public rights-of-
way; and
VI'HE1ZEAS, Spokane VaIley Municipal Code I0.05.220 establishes the procedures and requirements for
the vacation of public rights-of way;
NOW, 1"1-iER-EF0R-E; THE CI`I'Y COU'CIL OF TlqE CITY OT' SPO.KANE VALLEY,
WAST-1:INGTON OR.DAINS AS FOLJ.OWS:
Sectian I. Scction 10.09.04 of the Spokane Valle.y Uniform Development Code is hereby established to
read as follows:
~
~ J SECTIO\' 10.09.04.01 - Purpose and intent. Ttie nurpose of this chapter is to establish Section 9.04.10
of the Spokane Valley Uniform I7evelopment Code relating to the procedures, notice requirements and
fees for the vacatiori of strccts and alleys wiChin the city in conformance with the authority granted to the
city by Chapter '35.79 RCW and R.CW 35A.47.020 to read as follaws:
SFCTIO\T 10.09.04.10.02 - Initiation of Vacadon. The owners of an interest in any real property
abutting upon any street or alley who may desire to vacate the street or alley, or any par[ thcreof, may
pecicion the Cicy CounciL ln the alternative, the City Council rnay itsclf iniciate a vacacion by resolution.
The petition or resolution shall be filed with t-he City Clerk.
SEC'I':ION 10.09.0410.43 - Petition for Vacation. The petition shall bc in a form prescribed by the
Community Development Director (hereinafter rcfcrrcd to as "the 17irector" or his or her designee) and
shall bc signcd by t:he owners af mnre than hwo-thirds of the property aburiing the portion oFthe street or
alley sought to be vacated.
SCCT10\' 10.09.04.10.04 - FetiYion Cees. Every petition for the vacation of any strect or aIley or any
part t:hereof, shall be accompanied b_y a fee in an amount estahlishecl by resolution of the city to defray a
portion of the administrative costs incurred in processing the petition and publishing, posting and mailing
notices. '1"he fees shall not be refundeci under any circumstances. 'I'he ammount of the pctition fees shall be
scC by Resolution, and the set amount shall be stated in the Cicy oC Spokane Valley Master Fee Schedule.
SLC 1'10N 10.09.04.10.05 - SuMmittal Requirements for Pctitions.
Every petition shall be accompanied by: (1) an Assessor's N9ap fi•om the Spokane Gounty Assessor's
Offce showing with a solid red line thE portion of the street or alley sought to be vacated, (2) a vicittity
.~map showing the general area of the propased vacation, (3) a co{~y of tlic record of sun~ey; if available,
tor the subject street and alle_y proposed for vacation and abutting properties ancl streets ttnd alleys (4)
Page 1 oP 8
written evidence of any and all easements or allowances or reservations, public or private, pertaining to ,
the slreet or alley proposed for vaeatian; (5) awritten narrative describing the reasons for the nroposcd ,
stre.et vacation, il1e p}lysical limits of the proposed strcet vacation and the public benefit of the pronosed street vacation, and (6) a o►ie inch equals one hundred foot site map shvwing propnsed division of
vacation..
SECTIUN 10.09.04.10.06 - Setting of Hcaring. Upon receipt of the petition, the fee antl all required
dosuments, the Cicy Clerk shall forward the petition and required dnamients to the Director, who shall
determine whether the petition has been signed by the owners of more than owo-thirds of t.he property
abutting the part of the street or allcy to bc vacated. If the petieion has been signed by the requisite
percentage of such owners, the Director shall bring the petition hefore the CiCy Couneil within 30 days of
receipt of the petition, and the City Council shall by resolution fix the time when the petition will be
lieard by the City Gouncil, or a c_ommittee of tlhe City Council, which time shall not be more chan 60 days
nor less than 20 days after the adoption ofi'the resolution. VVhere the City Council initiates the vaaation by
resolution, that resolution shall fix the time wfien the proposed vacation will be heard by the City Council
nr a cnmmittee of the City Council.
SECTlON 10.09.04.10.07 - Staff Report. The Director, in eonjunetion with the 1'ublic VVorks
Tacpartment shall prepare a report coneerninb the proposed vacation. The Public Vlforks Department shall
be responsible for conducting a needs analysis of the street Qr alley proposed for vacation in consideration
ofcxistin~ and future transportation system nesds and requirements. 'I`he report shall address the criteria
to be considered by the City Couricil in determining whether to vacate the street or alley, and such olher
information as deemed appropriate by the Director including but noi limited to drainage requirements,
street closure requirements sueh as the removal and replacement of concrete, asplialt, and placement of
barriers (imiting vehicle movements. In preparing the report, the Director shall solicit commcnts f'rom the
Police Department, the Fire Department and may solicit comrnents from olher governmental agencies and
utiliry aompanies having jurisdietian or utilities within the boundaries of the City. The report shall be submittetl to the Planning Commissi4n and to tlie petitioner and his or her representative, not less than
scvcn (7) calendar ciays before the hearing.
SECTIO\T 10.09.04.10.08 - Noticc of Hcaring. Upon the passagc of the resolution fixing the timc for
hearina the petition or proposal for vacation, the City Clerk:; or the Director, acting under direction and
supcrvisiAn of the City Clerk, shal! -ive not less than 20 days' notice of the cime, place and purpose of the
hearing by (I) posting of a written notice in three (3) conspicuous places in the City; (2) publishing
wriacn notice once in the Cicy's afficial ❑ewspaper, (2) posting a minimum hwenty-four (24) inch by
thirty-six (36) inch notice sign in a conspicuous place at eaeh end of the street or alley souoht to be
vacated describing the proposed vacalion and the date, time and locatiqn of the public heairng; and (3)
mailing written notice to all petitioners at the addresses on the netilion and all owners of propcrtp abutting
the street or alley proposed to be vacated, as shown on the recnrds of the Spokane County Assessor, not to
exe.ced ninety (90) ealendar days from the date of the public hearing. The Director shall send the stune
written nAtice to the representative of the pelitioners at the address on the pctitian.
SECIYOn' 10.09.04.10.09 - Protcst. If fifty (50) percent or more of the abutting propercy owners file
writtcn objeceions to a City Council-initiated vacatioti with the City Clerk, prior to the tirne of tlle hearing,
tlie ciry sllall be prohibitetf from praceeding with tlle vacation.
SEC?IO\ 10.09.04.10.10 - Planning Commission Revicw- and Recornmendxtion. "I"he hearing on the
petition or proposal shall be held before the Planning Commission upon the day fixed by resolution or ai
the time to which a hearing may be adjourned. ]n its consideratoin of the proposed vacation of the sireet ~
or alley, the Planning Commission shall render a recommendatinn based qn the fbllowing criteria: J
A. Whether a change of use or vacation of the street or alley will better serve the public; Yage 2 of 8
B. Whetlier the street or allcy is no longer required i'or public use or public access;
C. Whether the substitut.ion of a new and differeni public way would hc more uscful to the
public;
D. Whcther conditions may so change in the future as to provide a jreater use or necd than
presently cxists; and
E. Whether objections to the proposed vacation are made by nwmers of private property
(exclusive of petitioners) abutting the street or alley or other governmental aaencies or members of the
general public.
F. Following the hearing; the Director shall fonvard the Planning Commission's recommendation
and the hearing minutes to the City Council at a regularly scheduled meeting. If a hearing is held beforc
the Plannina Commission, it shall not be necessary to hold a hearing bcfore the City CounciL provided
that the City Cauncil may at its cliscretion deternline tn hold a separate hearing on the proposal.
SECTION 10.09.04.10.11 - City Couiicil Decision. Following the hearing ancl receipt of the Planning
Commission's rec.ommendation the City Council sliall de.termine wheiher to vacate the street or alley.
"I he detennination shall consider, but not be limited to, the findings of the Planning Commission.
If the City Cnuncil determines to grant the vacation, the action shall be made by ordinanee wit11
such conditions or limita[ions as the Cit}, Council deems necessary and proper to preserve any desired
ptiiblie use or benefit. The orclinanee shall contain a prnvision retaining or requiring conveyaaice of
easements for construction, repair and maintenancc of cxisling xnd fucurc utilities and services.
1'ursuant tn fZCW 35.79.040, the City Council in approving a street vacation request shall speeiFy
that the vacalecl portion of the street or alley shall belong to the abutting propert?, owners, one-half to
each, wlless factual circwnstances otherwise dictate a different division and cliscribuCion of the street or
alley to be vacated.
The City Council reserves Che right to reyuire eompensation as a condition of approval of
ordinance action, provided that such compensation shall comply wich the requirements of RC V1'
35.79.030, and further, that any required compensation shall be paid to the City prior CU the City's
part.icipailon in required titlc transfer actions.
SECTIUN 10.09.04.10.12 - Vacation of Waterfront Streets.
A. The cit_y shall not vacate a street or alley if any portion of the street or alley abuts a body of
wacer unless: i. I he vacation is sought to enable the Ciry to acquire the property for beach or water
aecess purposes, or launching sites; park, wublic view, recreation, educational purposes,
or other public uses;
2. The Ciry Council, by resolution; declares that the street or allcy is not presently being
used as a street or alley and that the strcet or allcy is noi suiti►ble for any of the following
purposes: beach or water access, launehing sites, park, public view; recreation, or
education: or
3. The vacatinn is sought to enable tlie City to implement a plan, ad4pted by resolut.ion or
orclinance, that prnvides comparable or itnproved public access to the same shorcline area
to which the street or alley sought to be vacated abuts, had the properties included in the
plan not been racatcd.
B. E3efore adoptinu an ordinance vacating a screet ar alley under subsection (A)(2) of this section,
the City Counc.il shall:
, i
Fage 3 of 8
1, Cause an invcntory to be compiled of all rights-of way wit:hin the city that abut the
~
same bocly af water thal is abutted by the street or alley sought to be vacated; `
. %
2. Cause a stucly to be eonducted to determine if the street or alley to be vae<3ted is
unsuitable for use by the city for any of the following purposes: launching siles, heach or
water access, park, public view rGCreation, or education;
3. Hold a public hearing on the proposed vacation in the manner required by Chapter
35.79 1tCtiV and this chaptcr; and •
4. Include in its written decision a finding thai the street or tjllc}' sought to be vacated is
not suitable for any other purposes listcd under subsection (13)(2) of this section, and that
Chc vacation is in the public's inCerest.
C. Notice of the public hearing on the proposed vacalion shall be pravided in accordance with the
nntiee provisions of Section 10.09.04.10.08 of this Section, provided; that the Ciry sliall also post notice
of the public hearing conspicuously on the street or alley sought to be vae3ted, which notice shall indieate
that the area is a publie access, that the strcet or alley is proposccl to be vacated, a.nd that anyone objecting
to the proposed vacation should attend the public hearing or send a letter to ttie Director indicating the
abjection.
SECTION 1.0.09.04.10.13 - ApPlicaiion of 7oning District Designation. The zoning clistrict
designation of the properties adjoining each side of the street or alley t4 be vacated shall be automaticf►Ily
extended to the ccnter of such vacation, and all area shall included in the vacalion shall then and
henceforth be subjcct to all regulations of the extendecl districts. The aclopting ordinance shall specify
this zoning district extension inclusive of the applicable zoning district designations. ~
SECTION 10.09.04.10.14 - Recorcling of ordinance. A cer[ified copy of the orclinance vacating a strceC
or alley or part thereof, shall be recorcled by the City Clerk in the office of the Spokdne Counry Auditor.
SECTION 10.09.04.10.15 - Compliance to City Council Conditions. All conditions of City Council
authorization shall be fully satisfed prior to any transfer of title by the City.
SECTION 10.09.04.10.16 - Record of Surve}' Required. Following the City Council's passage of the
ordinance approving t.he proposal to vaeatc the street or alley, a record of survey prepared by a reoistcred
surve}ror in the State of Washington and '►nclucling an exact metes and bounds legal description and
specifying if applicable any and all easements for eonstruction, repair and maintenance of existing ancl
future utilities and services, shall be submitted by the proponent to the Direclor. Said recard of survey
shall contain the professional stamp and signature of the registered surveyor and f led upon completion
with the Snokane County Auditor. °I'he surveyor shall provide the City of Spokane Valley with a mylar
copy of the recorded survey ancf the Auditor's L7ocument Nurnber and date of reeordation.
SECTION 10.09.114.10.17 - Monument.ition. "I"he surveyor shall locate at least twro rnonuments on the
centerline of the vacated right-of-way with one loc;atecl at the intersection af the centerlirie of the vacated
riDht-of-way with each street or right-of-way in accordance widi the standards established by the Spokane
Cour7ry Standards for Xaad antl,S0+'er Consh°uctiotl.
SECTION 10.09.0410.18 - Costs of 1'itle Transfer to be 13nrne by Proponent. All direct and indirect
costs of title h•ansfer of the vacated street or allcy from public to privatc ownership including but not r-~
limited to title company cherges, copying fces; and recording fees are to be bflrne by the proponent. The
City will noc assume any financial responsibility for any direct or indirect costs for the trcinsfer of tiflc. "
Page 4 of 8
Sec.tion 2. - Repealer Ar[icle ]1] Ritht-of-Way Vacation; Spokane Valley City Code Section 10.05.220
et seq. is hereby repealed.
A-qia4 M. '
14. . ' . h,~-ooie ish , neti •~tils
fipEl-Feej-4he-wt6ai•'
't-y-4 ' . . _ -Emd
. m#-Ehe , . SWl-be
ee~+a~+++a?
40. . tion-ef-4'c3e . al-pr~ep
. .tFeet-er--it , je-GiEY
GOEHjAiI-~93-EI~E*-fi~1~HFl~~ , .
ft-wiE. -the GFt~~E3i'~
. . R~1811'°-Pi@-p6 y-t3P'-G'9fkTAnHfl4Ey
2-B+Fe " hH4-k-5+~~d
by-Eit2-Ovrf$-f}Pinef64h' ina the poFt n of the str-oot OF alley seught-*
g
, @_O1'-tit r3E-.4-h8
Sti~tEiiL' . . .
44kV5,-.-5E1-Y-eti4it*-k,e . l-eMtNey-eF_a.,._ P.,., the..,,.r , 511A b,.
tta~f-establish iemef-the
ftdmirivistr-raFive . ' g . ' p-ttfjd ptrW'', ' ' , ' ' a tiatiees. the T-he
~ 4;ees-9 . ' ' .
Reselutien, eHtmaenE- . N4ttsZer r-ee e,.hsa.,ie
4-0:95~6 . .
eeempanied-lyi-
. ' eli~!-C-°a~-li;;e.
peFEien-ef the-cfiree~-ev-Hdde}-seu_h* t°be vaeatedi
13--A-vi e-pr~apesacvaeat+en
C. K4-e4'-s , Ney-p
HbttEtieb . . A-4ee eaE'►ew,
peFt
.8_. . , .
r~e{esea fi-.-. ...,a
13. A Aq+#en nacnativedeseribing the-Te, e-physioaNimits-ef-the
. ' ia-mid44ie-p - , .EfeeE-v€iaatieff-.
10. . fl:CFi+If3t;. , the -€IFF W444-y
Gler-i-Slitkl~(!r-4Ym-d-1:•~1@-petiEF . : 4?H-l)1fLGtOI_, k!@kh8r4+18
peti4+ . OFH-l•Wf! t tbu
_ £#t~G'E{-{-f-E~t-f!C' . ei's',
~ie Direeter shall bFilig the petitien befi)re4he G-ity Gouneil m4hin 30 days-ef of the pet-tien7
tlW-Gi4y-Ge . . *-he Counie-1,
M fl;, 20 d.,,,s .,fte,. .i.e
,
8d0f3tt9F1-c3f-[h2-F2SA . ifl i , that
2 _ -0@Li o8-13f the Gify
l ~
Page 5 of 8
' n.84--Sta##--Reper-l. - , P(if~
. . '
be-fespen'
e
Fe.pg . ' ie-goblie Wer-k.s-~
eaflduetint-a-need$--analys+i aae)+--pr-opesed-for. eFIRE•ie{a-uf,exi~st+n-a~d ~
fuR+f6-+r4tFlsp6r-tFei3-5yst2ti;--nc°-e`~v-Zi.id . f2S: r~ e c ~rn~
40. . . y-th~ty~-~e~ ` etreF auey, and
sueh-Oi-HeF iFi€effnRtieri-ag--deoFne~p a ' Ftaae
-Ef- --3eflES, StFeet elestr~e-reqtt+FeRIents-sctelt-a.c the renlew~ fieFete, asplialt, and
}laearnefi , pe..., fh., n:..e,..,.. Sti..il~,oE4k
cialmments-ff-em the--Reliee-Depanment, E~je Fate -Depaqeot-aenEs--ffem eflie~
gawFmnenW-agensies-aid-utOity-sempe.:.,.. h,,..•.,g ; e
Gity-The FepeH-shall-be--sttb~~itt:d-te-the Pla ' ~ Gaiiifnission fi 's-car-k~e~
Fepmsent&e, n.,t le tI,...,sey`,,.,-ccric'.,nva ..rvays I,,.F...... .t,e t,n$Fln$_
4.1};p• . n-Ehe passage. 4ifne-fer-hea++ng-dw-petiiie"
, 4eeEeF, aetiiig ide~ - . he-G~
QeFk-,-Shall give not les., :h,,., 70 .1., r? , e..e of+-cicc:fFT ,e--plE192-f3i9fl-PH+Pese-ef-i:he-heitiifi3`~`-b1(-1 ) p
.,In ♦1
fJ; l/'1\~J Y`.1.l:~~nl,'TT~,ig ~:i~ 'ffr,. '
- ~ ccv
effioial 3E'iW$pap2i, (3) p6S.. ifl . d@e^ftt.
E'ft0li-@nd--Af-flle-5EF• HtI(i , tiiiie
n-nd leeatf0-B-EYf-th£?-'publ1Lai:Hig; fifid (4) 3:3H-FEF *t,e .,,7aPesSes ,.r, tF.o
j3@t-kiOflidild-2ll 9wRHr-&-0lf-pre3e.-I.}`AF-E3lle~-(} , ` ~30'1V~t1-0ti-ti2
FL' , . LiEe^ef-Elle-pH
heafing. Tj,. ,-,•..n,.:,... s►,.,ii re
potitien-
io.05.30 50 -persent eF FReFeh e ' .
varati ft-w►tH--the-(;it}--G1er , g,
€faiii-pt-ee-e ' fi-
10.05_i i n nl.,....:.,,. Commission l .
pmpesftl • . H4e
.wh' . ftFeet-er- itiley,~e
' b < sian sital nde~- datien-based ified-4hSee"a44-A-fr.
FeEEew+naa444dr-rvw-a d..,;r
lieer~g nainutes-te-tIae GityGe~ ' scheduled if L'i -;ear~ '
P1t3m#itg-i i~;-i~;Tr;=~~01~4~e--F]e8855N r:a, r,.,,.,,,:t .:,Jo,l t1„e
~ ~
d
44:0S.320 r:,., r.,.RCA re , c,.N d-FG .,f .i, oi., G„ ssien=5
F2EA+}}fn6H~HEFE1i1-ti12-Gft}'-C9tm E'rN~°t4,e. +r, . ,..,ro 4ho rrro@~-,0p-afl
4i,a44-in , itnited-tej-eemsk4er 'ng-c3piteris-
A llfl.etl.oF_.Le.l~. e .
Ci \A76:, qUiF kotte@E'S9;
. St ,
P. it•fOtTs-Riz'ky s9-fiM p
j3Ft?58t~ dy-231 .-i~£5;-3fid
. WhetlieF jPiC3i:-tOHS te the---pF(3p{i9 td6-b
($3iG'{ttS+4Q-ef pe4ttivrr" '"cr,) avcctt}tlv-h _ ei' gevemmentfil o ~hE
n2lieffil-pUbliG•
l
,
. .e r:r, an „d_.,,-9no ~..J
s er- lim• a
sttCh-60ndtHen
Page 6 of 8
p"ici-use -or bojiefit. Tbe ' anee-me~ s Hai - f
ease , . g . .
-°uf-stttnE-E RGAI 35.79.040, W-in-e Ft-feqLiost_si,.,ii o ;a.
ilifii--Ehe-Yt'tet►tec#-pefta ~ ~ ' o ,
eacii, . '~+~a edheFwise r~e _ ; fl-of-4e-sEr8et-er•
alley to be vasated.
' tna , Mpa P-hppfev&l-ef
. , - ►t1
eFdiliaiiee 35.79.030, alld er; !am _ e--&4~,=s
--6er~s:
•lA:-0:5:330-V-amti .
. . ~-stf-a tree~i
w~r-u~rEess= - -
-t-:Fl~e-viten6e ' ess
f.MFpe9e,q; OF lftflOha'-s- e . par-ii, , , RM-pUFPeseS, eF edle!' p
tfse's; T-he . . Gouneil, _ , deejaFe E4e-s ing--eised-as
A-stFeei-6F alley-a fOlIO-A'illl- ~ . befieb
~ g, 9-tes, pa4E;-"bli9 , , ~
3.41h . ' Ey-Eo--im , adopted •ese4utiej3-eF
erdinatiee, t#"r~owde 0-4-h
r , , s-i*~d-+n-the
~ been vaeated.. BefOFe . subseeti \"4L11_„~kh:r cetir...,
1h8-GMt), GHHR6kl sli&ll!
i r., e aii . ;.{e
e€;A'ateFthflE-is-Ftbtttta _ g . AEeEl;
e-eendut= .
y . . e~4 . . launehing-, sHfee ,
PaFk, i!s C3F--etW6f3CiAfl;
. j)0S@fl-w3F. ' 77 '
.,d ,h:,. ,.hapte"wi
4 h,..l..ao ;t.. ..;~'H-(~2CxiSfiE?€i-E fiiidiiig t1,.., the ..f.. e. er- ey-s0 b jOi:
SNkBb{2-f8F€my-Oth - . . EIQ ' , aiid he vE#68t-}@R
iS-o„ tt,o .,ubl:,.=.. :.,ro..o,.r
1ier:.,e .,f'tl,e .~~ke4te TttTt7RJ'C t]i'fttC
rt~H~an , , S64-a4~s
ptrwit-he,H=' _ eug , t4ee-s#all-i+►d+eate 0+84
the-aFea-+ , ,
the . e 'eeti~
objeetion-
Fage 7 of 8
1-0:05.340rApp1i...t: „s Zooin:g-DtstrietDesig"ttc► . signa6011 -~P-Ehe
pr~eper-ties adjoiningeaeli side ef the--str-eeE-~r-alley to utomat"eally . <
,
oeiiteF ,.F s ..1, Qg ft~iA; „t,.,ll tt,e ,d ►,e eF .f 4.vae h e ,1,: : t„ i
,
all regulf#E#e . iiifto d'TSt.Ft6I
ek€eijsion-ine-las+ve-cf4k►e-app! ieable zetiiiig di'sifW
44.4-54-~-Rec.-e#=aFdi#w-nce. n e~:fi~a_ st~el'-o~4epa
twe.e,.f,L ..►,.,u be-r~eco .
1-0:8-5- 'ttn . .
h-e €t]'~ysatis~pr-i8 F.;*l„ w.. *i,e r:ti.
.4A:N5.37&-Keeo: .,r c..,,..,,.. qtriFed. r.eli..,,,:,,,. tho_Gi ' '
e-propesaa--fe-vaeate-Eh a r&o -
itNtltt7~tT Washington n ' •
. . , ' . . b Ut')YtLtCs
t'i'Nd-SE1''V'1'eE9, iEef3te . .
pi-efessF9p-'&i b E*- r-egistervd , shall f4f3•tFt-SEbfflaEufE'-{iHB5 -f;DF-iihe. GFl?y,-ef
Spekan . --S
' o , ' ~ t-~y-.SRa--e&st+r~uey
shall , ,
(1-00)e . . aEe-d-st-eet----eNe1
.1.0.05.380 C„st" •r:d-~-t' . 4- 1- 3'-RrApF?~ tent. .
s-:r-a+S€eF-ef4he-vaeA P 'mited-to-Eitle
b , , em--44jo-Gi4y-w94-aet
i.- i rl- .1. fe
assu - st-eest .
Section 3 Seversbility. If any section, sentence, clause or phrasc of ihis ordinance, or any regulation, rule or order adopted pursuant to the authority thercof be determined invalid or uncnnstitutinnal, ic shall
not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this
ordinance.
Section 4. Effective dste. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect fve (5) days after publicatinn
of this ordinance or a summ3ry thcreof in the official newspaper of the City as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council this day of , 2005.
Diana VJilhitc, Mayor
AT'TLS7':
Christine Bainbriclge, Cih' Clerk
Approved :is to form:
Cary P. Driskcll, Deputy City t'1ttorncy
Date of publication:
E.ffecti<<e date:
Page 8 of 8
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
~ Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 2-15-05 City Manager Sign-aff:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
X information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Water safety regulations discussion.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 7.25
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adoption of water safety regulations in 2003.
BACKGROUND: The Council previously adopted water safety regulations that specified what
the penalty would be. In adopting the original regulations, the Council discussed whether to
make changes to the County regulations prior to adopting them as Spokane Valley water safety
regulations. The Council elected to not change them prior to adoption. One of the regulations that was adopted pertains to the level of penalty that can be charged for
a violation. It currently reads that conduct in violation of the code can result in either an
infrac#ion or a criminal charge. Legal staff believes it is inappropriate to be able to charge for
either a civil violation or a criminal violation for the same conduct, that it has to be one or the
other.
In reviewing applicable law on the matter, legal staff found a table of state infraction penalties
for water safety violations in the Infraction Rules for Court of Limited Jurisdiction (IRLJ). These
are state court rules that provide default penalty amounts for district and municipal courts if a
local jurisdiction does not set its own amounts. The table is attached to this RCA for
convenience.
In reviewing fhe table, all of the activities proscribed by the City's water safety regulations have
a base penalty amount of either $37 or $62. With statutory court costs and fees, the amounts
would average out to around $100. A class three civil infraction, with court costs and fees, is
$103. For ease of use by our City Police, staff recommends making all violations a class three
civil infraction.
OPTIONS: Do nothing; ask staff for more information; instruct staff to draft amendments for
further consideration by Council.
RECONiMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS: None anticipated.
STAFF CONTACT: Cary P. Driskell, Deputy City Attorneyl Cal Walker, Chief of Police
ATTACHMENTS: Water safety infraction amounts from IRLJ.
„
' r= IRLJ 62 COILiRTS OF L•IA'IITEA Ji,FR15I)ICTIO\'
.i
Base
Penatty
:
Vehieular TrafFic-1I~tiere Permitied-Generally (WAC 352-37-
Ou0) $62 (
Eqaestrinn'Ii-af€c (WAC 3n2r37-030) $37 i
Pedestrians To Be CTranted Hight of Way (WAC 352~.~7-090) S37
Beach Parking (WAC 352-3 r-100) . $24 Ovemight Parking or Camping Prohsbited (WAC 352-37-110) _ $62
'i Speed Luruts (R`AC 352-37-130) $87
(4) Boating Infractions • ~
Opera#ing~~essel in Negl.ieen; Mar,ner (RCW ?9A60.030) $162
i
r~o I'ersnnal Flotat~on De~-ice (~'FD) oti Vessef for Eac}i Person
r (RCW r9A6U-16U(1)) $37
~ Personal Flotation Device Not the Appropriate Sue (RCW
79A.60.16U(1)) $37
Personal FEotation Detiice Not Readily Aceessible (RCW
79A.60.164(1)) $37
Observer Required on Board Vesse] (RCSV 79A.60.1 r0(2)) S37
~ Observer To Contir,nously Observe (RCW 79A.60.170(2)) Sri
" Failure To Display Slder pow-n Flag (RCW 79A.6{1170(2)) ~37
' F'lag/Pole vat.to Speciucations (ItGVV 79A.60.170(2)) $37
Observer poes Not Meet Minirctum Quatificatians (RCFi' ~
79_A.60.1 r0(3)) $62
Wate-r Slder Fdot Wearing Personal Flotation De-vice,(12CW
. , { 79A.60.170(4)) $62 I
~
y. Overlaadins of Vessel Beyond Safe Carsying Abilit), (RCW
K 79A,.FU.180(1)) $112
Carrying Passengeas in Unsafe Mannor (RCVV 79A.60.180(1)) ' $62
. r~ . Overpowering of <<esse! Beyond Vessal's Ability To OPerate Safely
(RCW 79.A.60.1$0(2)) $112
Person Noi Wearing Personai F'lotation Device (PFD) on Personal
' • ~ Waiexcxaft (RCW 7 9A.60.190(i)) $62
T'ailure To Gir•e AccidenF, Infoa-mation to Law Enforeement (RMV '
79A60.200(1)) ' $112
Motor Propelleci Vessels ~'iihout Effective Ir4uffler in Good
Worlong Order and Constant Usee (RCW 79A.60.I30(1)) $37
Sound Leyel in Exeess of 90 Aecibels for Engines Made Before
i/1194U sing StationaryTest (RCW 79A.60.130(1)) 537
' uound Level in Eaccess of 88 Deeibels for Engines laiade on or
Afeer l,rl/94 Using Stationary Test (RCW 79A.60.130(1)) $3^r
Sound Leve] in Excess of 75 Decibels Using Shoreline Test (RCW
79A.60.130(3)) $37
' Removing, Altering or IVqodi€ying Muffler or 114uft1er System -
(RCW 79.e,.60.130(7)) $37
Iv4ar,ufaciuring, Selling, or Offering for Sale Any Vessel Equipped
tiV-itJz Noncomplying Muffier or MufLler System (RCW
79_A.60.130(8)) . $&9
Vessel Exemption/Exeeption for Comgeting in Racing Events .
Garried on Board Operating Vessel (RGW 79A64.130(8)) $37 ~
1
Personal F'Iotatian Devices (PF'Ds) (1~i~AC 352-64430) - • $37
Visual Distress Signals (VVAC 352-64-044) $37 . Ventilataon (WAC 352-60-450) $37
r~• Nar-igation Ligh}s and Sound Signals (WAC 352~'►0-060) $27
Steering and Sailing (bVAC 352~'i0-T(0) $37
Fire Extinguishing Equipment (WAC 35?~60-080) $37
• r , $ackfire Flarne Gontrol (WAC 352-60-090) $37'
'
Liquefied Petroleum Gas (WAC 352-60-100) $377
992 Wash Ct Rules 4nno
~ ~ ~ ;;I
nnAFT
ADVANCE AGEivUA
For F'lanning laiscussion Purposes Only
as of February lU, 2005 9:30 a.m.
Please note this is a work i❑ progress; ilems are tentative
"I'o: Council & Staf1'
From: City Manager
Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings
Februarv 16-17, 2005 Cit4, Lcl!islative Action Conference (CLAC) Associstion c,f Washinjzton Cities
IZed Lion Olympia Hotel, Olympia, Wa.
Februarv 22, 2005, Rep-ular Meetinp- 6:00 n•m. [due date Thursda}', February 101
1. Unfinished Busiiie.ss: Tabled ltem: Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Appointment [15 minutes)
2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance OS-Ol 0 Creating Assessment Reimbursement Area - Cary
Driskell [15 minutes]
3. I'irst Reading ProposE;d Ordinance Placing On Ba11ot:, Anncxation to Spokane Co. Library Taistrict [15 min]
4. First Reading Proposed Street Vacation Ordinance Amendment - Alarina Sukup/Car_y Driskell [ 10 minutes)
5. f'irst Reading 11'roposed Stormwacer Ordinance (formerly # 04-007 initial first reading 02-24-04)-
Neil Kersten [20 minutes]
6. T'irst Reading Proposed Fawn Shop Ordinance - Car}° Driske(I/Cal Walker [10 minutes]
7. Motion Consideration: Local Agency Agreement, F'ederal Aid Project 1'rospectus -
Steve VVorley/Nleil Kersten [10 minutes]
a. Distirnan-Mica Road Project c. Broadway Project
b. Argonne Road Project d. Appleway Project
8. Administrativre Reports: .
a. Fair Boarcl Presentation - I.any Taavis (tentutive) [15 minutes]
b. Revisions to Nluisance Code (garage sales) - Cary Driskell [15 minutes]
c. Renumbering Ordinance - Uniform Development Code - Nlarina Sukup 0 minutes]
9. Information Only: a. Departmental Monthly Rcports; b. Planiiing Commission viinutes;
c. Nlotes from Cauncil/Planning Commission Joint Meeting of February 1, 2005
. [cstimatetl meeting: 135 minutes*]
Nlarch 1, 2005, Freetlrnan, Tunl! & Battonilev Update Meetina 2:00 p•m•, Council Chambers
M9i•ch 1, 2005. Shiclv Session 6:00 a.m. (due date Thursday, February 17 J
l. Freednian, Tung & Rottamley .8 riefing -Niarina Sukup (30 minules)
2. Disincorporation Statutes - Cary Driskell (15 minutes)
3. Revicw of Comp Plan EIcments (Land Use, Transportation) - Greg VtcCormiclJScatt Kuhta (60 minutes)
4. Centennial Trail Maintenance Discussion - Mike Jackson (10 minutes)
TOTAL MIlNiJTES: 115
Max. mtg. tiine: 150 minutes
Msrc6 8, 2005, Tteq_,ular ~1'leetinz 6:00 p.m. [due datc Thut-sday, Fehruary 241
1. Sec.ond Reading PrAposed Street Vacatian Qrdinance Amendment- Marina Sukup/Cary Driskell[10 minutes7
2. Second Reading Proposed StormwaterOrdinance - Neil Kersten [10 minutes)
3. Second Reading Proposed F'awn Shop Ordinance - Cal Walker [10 minutes)
4. Second Reading f'roposed Qrdinance Placing On k3allot, Annexation to Spokane Co. Library District [15 min]
5. First Reading Proposed Sign Ordinance - Mariiia Sukup 1:10 minutes]
6. First Reacling: Rsvisions to Nuisance Code (garage sales) - Cary Driskell [l5 minules]
7. l=irsl R.eading Proposcd Nuisancc Renumberino Uniform Dcvclopment Code - Marina Sukup [10 minuets]
8 Nlotion Consideratian: Gl-S System - Marina Sukup [10 minutes)
9. Administrative Report:
a. Rcvicw of Comprchcnsivc Plan rlEinent~s (Capital Facilitics) - Marina Sukup/Scott Kuhta 1:60 ininutes]
(estirnatcd meetina: 150 minutes*]
DraB A&anee Ager►cia 2/1012005 9,34 AM Page ! of3
Marcli 11 - 15, 2005 Congressic►nal Cit-y Conferenee, VVashington D.C.
,
iVlarch 15, 2005,N0 MFET1NG
A'larch 22, 2005, l7egulrar Meeting G:UO n.m. [due clate TMursday, March 101
1. Second Reading: Revisions ta NuisAnce Code (garage sales) - Cary 17riskell (15 minutes]
2. Second R.eading t'roposed Sign C7rdinance - Marina Sukup [20 minuces]
3. First Reading Proposed Nuisance Renumbering Uniform Development Code - Marina Sukup [10 minuets]
4. First Readinn Proposed Ordinance: Iiazard Mitigation Plan - Marina Sukup [1 5 minutes]
5. iVlatrix Sche:dule I'ermittcd Uses - Marina Sukup [ 1S minutes]
6. Administrative Reports:
a. State of the Couri. Taiscussion - JuclgE PadclenlCary Driskell [15 minutes]
7. lnformation Only: a. Departmenta) Monthly Rcports; b. Planning Commission Minutes
[estimated meeting: 90 minutes*]
b7arch 29, 2005 StudY Session 6:00 p.m. [due date Thursclay, Mareh 171
April 5, 2005. Stucly Se.ssion, 6:00 p.m. [due datc fhursday,1''Istrch 2411
1. T'raffic Control/Special Event:s - Cal Walker/Mike Jacl:son (20 minutes)
2, Prism/Plus/1'adal (Parcel laata L,ocator) System - Marina Sukup (15 minutes)
3. Commercial 4uilding F'ermit Process i'lowchart-Nina ResorMariria Sukup/Neil Kersten (15 minutes)
TQTAL NIIYUTES: SU
Max. mto, time: 150 minutes
April 9, 2005 - MaYOr's Ball '
April 12, 2005, Rej!ular 1'leetinp 6:00 n.11L [due dlte Tt►ursday, March 311
1. Second Reading Proposed Orciinance: Waz.ard Mitigation 1'lan - Marina Sukup [ 15 minutesa
2. Massage Parlors/Bath I-Iouses - Cal Walker/Car>> Driskell [15 minutes]
3. Blasting (Nloise) Ordiriance - Cary Driskel l [15 minutes]
TOTAL MllSTLTTES: 45
vlax. mtg. time: 150 minutes
AUril 19, 2005t Studv Session, 6:00 p.m. [due date Thursday, April 71
Fair Board Presentation (tentative) (15 minutes)
Auril 26, 2045, Rcgular Nleetint! 6:01) p.m. [due date Thursclay, April 14]
1. lnformation Only: - .
a. Departmerital Monthly f'Zeports; b. Plannino Commission Minutes
[estimated meeting: _ minutes*]
I>ru(t Advance Agenda 2/10/2005 934 AM Page 2 of 3
'Mav 3, 2005, Studv Sessinn, 6:00 p.m. iduc date 'I hursciay, April 211
Mav 102005 ReRular vleelint! 6:00 p.m. [due datc Thursday, Api•il 281
1. All elements nf the Comprehensive 1'Ian (90 minutes)
May 17, 2005, Stucll' Session, 6:00 p.m. [due datc Thursday, M.ay 51
Mav 24 2CIU5, ltcgul.►r NTeetinE 6:00 p.m. [clue date Thursday, ~1~Iay 121
1. All elements of the. Comprehensivc Plan (90 minutes)
2, l.nfonnation Only:
a. 17epartrnenta) Montlily Reporls; h. Planning Commission Minutes
[estimated meeting: _ minutes*]
Mav 31, 2005, Stiadv Session 6:00 p.m. [clue date `Chursdity, May 191
~ .
r
\ i
OTHFR PENDIIVC ANL1/0R ijPCOMTNC ISSUES:
Sec;onti keading Proposed Sidewalk Ordinaiice 04-012 -(frst readino 02-24-04)
Panhandling - Cal Walker
June 11, 2005 - Mid-Year CouncillStaff Rctreat, 9 a.m. - noon
June 21-24 AV1'C 2005 Annual Conference, Tri-Citie_s
Regional Stornlwater Desigm Manual - John Hohman _
InitiativelRe.ferendum
HElmet Safeh' Issue Research Update - Cary Driskell
Street Pavin~ Funding Optiori -Neil Kersten (Gary Schiminels)
1V1_TTTTNGS TO BE SCHF-niJT,.ED
1 open house - wastewate.r issues ("I'o Be Announced)
estimaced meeting time daes not include time for public commentsJ
Drati Advlncc Agcnda 211012005 9:34 .AM Nage 3 of 3