The URL can be used to link to this page

2005, 04-26 Regular Meeting 41-e- AGENDA SPnhaNc. VALLEY CITYCnt?tiCIL REGULAR MEETING #65 Tue.sdsy. Apri126, 2005 r►:ua h.m. f-TT1' HAIyL AT [tEUt1'OnD PL42-4 11707 East Sprapuc Avcdue. Fjrst Floor ('ouncil Kcyuestc A11 Electronic Drticcx hc Tnrnr+l dff Iluring <.ounril 1lcrling CALL TO t)Ri1E:lt INN'OCAT1QNc ti>r SlLti f iuLl•ON. \.=:le: 1d~eti tiS! i_ hurtih ['LFl)GF l)F AI_LF:GLAIY(:E: ROLL CAL.L APi'it(1V.&L C)F AGENl)A 1N'C12(IUl~(*T10n (1f~ 5E'EC1AL. GLTSTS ANI) YEtEtiE:\1'AT1C)'.!ti Ll(ik' I'c.Nll-vl Cltarr f'rn f`rv.~,•nwiinn c'O114MI7TE:F.. BnARD. [.LAISU\ SlI MM A R1' REPOltT~ MAti"(1R'S l2EPnI2'f: f'roclnmatinn ; tldc: lmrricar.', %S,,nth I'IBLIC C0MAiFVTS Fnr mcmhi.~rs uf thc Public ta xpcal: tv d1t L 0unL11 Wg3rJlnL.~ aa thr a-enda Plwtr swte your nanic and aJdress tor ttic rcck,r.i and limit rcmctrk= i,.. ruinute~- 1. Pl;IiLIC I{~f~ARi'~G: Propi75CiI 2~~~.►: isu~i~et Amendment k~en f h~amPs~~n PUBt.1C HRALRI:NG: Ameiiding 2005 'fransporu+iian lmptovemcnt Progrtm (TIP) - Ncil f:crsien 3. Ct)NSENT AGEnUA Consist5 of itc,ms ransidered mutine which arr appnwrd as a graup. A i:;wncilmembc:r muy rrmovc sn item fmm thc Cansent Agenda to Eie considerEd separttiety iNutr: Cnuneil muy cntertnin a motinn to w•anc rruding xnd ApNrovr C'onsem Ageadu.l a. ApprUval ef Rrgiilar Council 'Nlcctinu htinutes of April l;. b.'1pprav»1 uC 1'a)Trll of April 15. 200= uf $111,079. 1 0 c Aprrv%al af thc Follou-ing VcsuchcYS: v o[tCHI.-R I.IST VUtJC'HF.R 'IOI"AL UA7'E Number(s) VOUCHER A'NOLI NT ~ 04-0$-C15 6594-6625 342,551.79 04-1 {-05 6026-6665 416.234,26 GRtih`D "T'nrAL 758.786.05 ~E« B["~ItiF:SS d. Fir:5t Kcading Praposed C)rdinAnee 05-0 18, Amending 2005 Budget - Ken Tttiomp:ckin (pubtlc cotumcat) i'rl1po~d Rr~;olutir+n 05-006 Amcnding 2005 TTT' - Ncil Kerstcn jpubtic «ninteoci Pl`tiLIC Cn.NiNtE=NTS Far mcmtx:rs ut thc I'ublic to sprak ui lhr Cuuncil regarclirig mattcrx N()T r►n thr Agenda I'Ic:v,;c St,ur your name and adilrc:5 for thr rcrord and lirziit srmarks to thrcc rninutc; 11)!4ILN15'I'1tATINT RF.I'ClRTS: (no publtc cuinmcnt) o. Fair E3oard Prcsent8ticxi - Erits Gurtel and llully fiualic,, 7. Ec:onomic [evclarmcnt Council Presrntation - Jan L'liassi:n and Tt►crew ti,,t,,l.•r 8. Mobile Datn Camputers nnd JAiI Stuffing - Cal Wall:er and Mark Steri: 9. Sign Codc Discussinn - Mnrina Sul:tjp !U I'n% erncnt C'ut f'ult,:~ Nril K:rstcti. .fI_111 11 I I:1h1n3n. :iiid 'Aarina "u1.1_1 11 (NFi1RA1A1 I(ri OtiL1 : jno puhltc commcnij 1 l. I31astinct (Noix) Orainxncc ln(armationbl N fcnioraridii»i 12. Mcmorandum on Splnsh Dowti Lr$sr I 3. hlcmorandum Rcgarding CitylCounty Park- Facitity I'il ('j;~.►~ ;t I•I t~~temornndum Re~rdine Iiic~ ltesults an Crauni- tiCv. ~ r 1"- ! 15. Spokane County Library Uistrie:t Murch Repo^ 16. Plnnning Cammissioti ATinutcs i March 24. 201 17 Dcpartmental Monthly Rcpact~ XI1J0['RNMENT f'CICXL'SCHEDI 1_f' Regulur C'vunrllAlcetings uri• gcitcrfilli' heli! 2nd and 4" Fue.,dcivs, beginning u! A: 0U p.m. Counci! Stugy Sesslvn.r urc generul!y /ttld 1", -r'mtr! Sdr TucsdaYs, berinrring at 6:00 p.m. 01hu Tenlatit-Y G'ncnming AleelinrsfF.setrn: May 17, ?OOS,loint Mcrting Council und !'lunmn; n0ii p.n;. - l_ clmrcheni~ e f'i;-w Elcments - Presentation of PiiGlic Ifcurutg larcxfi lunc 11. 2005 - Nfid-Ycar l oiincil,'Staff ItLtreat 9 n.m. - rwon Ial. 11 t_. hL: i. JL.d r,j_ •A (,.II j ~ t•J..!tli .1. l..-..i, i. I'. :ilf._ i.)' ~:~tC-. ::t~'~1I I'~'.t;. 11 t •;i i i Ic-f :i( 5 J,1~ i' n~ i. ~1 inL• !.i.,' _ r' r, t,.:i'-_ ~~~e'•::v iI-_'r,.:iii'.•,:.tr `,1rt•! n~f'1 c CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: April 26, 2005 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply; ❑ consent ❑ old business X new business )(public hearing ❑ information El admin. report X pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Proposed Amendments to the 2005 Budget GOVERNING LEGISLATION: State law requires a public hearing and an amendment to our budget when we believe we will exceed our appropriations. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: The City budget for 2005 was adopted in November of 2004. At the February 2005 retreat the city council directed staff to prepare amendments to the 2005 budget for additional personnel and programs needed to complete the 2005 budgef year. The city council discussed these amendments to the 2005 budget on April 12. The Finance Committee of the city council met on April 18, 2005 to review these amendments. Q BACKGROUND: Amendments to the 2005 budget are needed to: 1.) update the budget for programs and projects carried over from 2004 into 2005; 2.) reflect the addition af employees to maintain service levels; 3.) transfer funds for use in street maintenance and capital projects; 4.) reserve funds to maintain operating service levels, to set aside monies for civic buildings and to prepare for extraordinary weather.conditions; and 5.) update the 2005 budgef for changes in capital projectsJprograms, A more detailed listing of the proposed budget amendments is attached as exhibit A. OPTIONS: Options include amending the budget, amending the budget for some of the changes and making no amendments. The budget should be amended tD comply with Washington State law. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Hold public hearing BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS: Passage af this ordinance will provide the budget authorization to move ahead with these programs and projects. STAFF CONTACT: Ken Thompson, Finance Director , , ~_J ~ ! ~~Li ~ Prop4sed Amendinents to the 2005 Budget ~y KI .•Ir-~ • C Ken Thompson, Finance Director April 26, 2005 ~ : - f Proposed Budget Amendment ~ ■ 20D4 cartyover projeustpxograms ■ Retreat decision to add employees ~ ■ Generat FunO transler to strest aperations & cap6tal ■ EstabUsh rQServes . Scrvicc tn-rd stebizetlon ■ MuRer waather ■ Ctvit buildFwnys ■ Changes to 4udgeted capital projeds/Fxograms Itecommenclation j - Pdo6on fo forwarcl the ordinance to the May 10, cauncil meeting (or a secontf reading. 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: April 26, 2004 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ nevr business Z public hearing ❑ informatiorl ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Amending 2005 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Resolution 04-019 dated 6I22104 adopting the 2005- 2010 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP); Council approval on November 16, 2004 for Mayor signature on the Project Certification Statements for each SRTC application for federal grant funds; Council approval on October 19, 2004 for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) applications. BACKGROUND: Council adopted the 2005-2010 TIP based upon information staff had at that time relative to available funds and how these funds could be utilized for transportation projects. Council also approved the following list of projects for which we submitted funding applications fo SRTC: • PineslMansfield Congestion Relief Project • Appleway Boulevard Reconstruction - Tschirley to Hodges Road • Argonne Road - Indiana Avenue to Montgomery Avenue • Dishman-Mica Road -1s' Avenue to Sprague Avenue ~ • Broadway Avenue - Bates Road to Sullivan Road • Valley Corridor - Project 2, Appleway Extension - University Rd. to Evergreen Rd. . g'' Avenue Reconstruction - Havana Sfreet to Park Road • Park Road - Sprague Avenue fo Broadway Avenue • Wellesley Avenue - Sunnyvale Road to F1ora Road Grant funding was received for all but the last three projects. Staff also submitted two CDBG applications for pavement improvements to Montgomery Avenue from 1) west of Argonne road to University Road, and 2) from University Road to Pines Road (SR-27). The portion of Montgomery from University to Pines has been selected for funding. Based on this infiormation, it is recommended that the 2005 TIP be amended to reflect the deletion of the projects that did not receive funding, include newly funded projects, and include those projects that were not completed in 2004 and have been carried over to the 2005 construction year. Projects that received grant funds must be included in the adopted TIP before we can proceed with design and construction efforts. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Hold public hearing BUDGETlFINANCIAL IMPACTS: The 2005 budget is being amended to include'the additional c4sts associated with this amended 2005 TIP. ~-1 STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Worley, Senior Engineer; Neil Kersten, Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Resolution 05-006 with attached amended 2005 TIP D1t.AF'1 ~ CiTY OF SPOKANL VALT,.FY SFOK.ANE COUNTI', WASHiNCTON RL+ SOlrUT10N NO. 05-006 A fZE' S4LUT.TON OF rHE CITY OF SYOKAiNF VALLEY, SPQK.A\'E C(UUNT1', WA$H]NGTO\T, AMENDING TFJEE 2005 TRANSF'OltTATIQ\' IMF'170VE.MT'N7 l'RnGRrV~7 FOR THE CITI' OF Sl'OK.ANE VATaLFX. W1-iEIZEAS, the CiCy Council for $pokane Valley did adopt by Resnlution \'o. 04-019 the 2005- 2010 Six-Year Transporiation Improvement Program (`CIP) tvith such program acting as a guide fqr the coordinated development of the City's transportation system; and NNrl-IER.EAS; changes in certain funding sourees have occurred; and W[-ICRrAS, the aCuiChed amended 2005 TIP does incoi-poratc said changes for year 2005; and WFIFR.CAS, pursuant to the Statc Environmental Policy Act, die adoption of'the Six-Year TiP is a nonproje.et aeeion which ha.s received proper and timely cnvironmental review by the City; and W1-1L.REAS, the amendments io the 2005 TIl' a.re consistent with Spoka»e Valley's adopted lnferim Comprehensive Plan; and VdFIFREAS, this action canstitutes tin amendment to the City's lnterim Capita] Facilities Plan ~ under its Interim Comprehensive Plan, arld has been sent to the Washington Stace 17epartment: oC Community Trade and Econotnic Developmcnt for review pursuarit to RCW 36.70.A. 106. NOW THEREFO1tE:, be it resolved by the City Council of the Ciry of Spokitne Valley, Spokane Cnunry, Washington; as follows: 7"he Cit}, Council hereby ado}its the attached amended 2005 1'll" for the City of Spokaiie Valley for the purpose of guiding the design, development and construction of local and regional transpartation improvements for the year 2005. The City Clerk is directed to file the amended 2005 TIl' with the VVashington State Secretary ot' Transportation not more than diirty (30) days after adoption of tljis Resolution. 'I'hc imended 2005 Tf.l' sMall, at lesst; be annually reviewed for the purpose oFdeterntining the work ac.c.ompfished under the prvgram 311v tlie City h-ansportation reyuireiitettts. }'rojects and limeframes identified in the TIE' are to be eonsidered estimstes only that rnay change due to a variety of circumstances; and arc not intended by ttic City to be relied upon by peoperty owners or devclopers in making development decisions. Adoptect this 26"' day of April; 2005. City of Spokane Valley ATTEST: Diana GVilhitc, Mayor OLristine Bainbridge; City Clerk H:lcbainbridbelResolutionsUicsolution ramending 2005 TIP dralt4-26-05 with legal chgs.vOC City of Spokane Vailey Department of Public Works Adopted 2005 Transportation Improvement Program 2005 Primary Project From To Source City Amounf Total Project Spokane River 1 Bark2r Road Boone Br. AIP $ 215,000 $ 1,114,000 2 Pines/Mansfield Wlbur Pines Road TPP $ 28,000 $ 1,777,000 Pines & Indiana West Bound Ramps 3 Barker Road Bridge at Spokane River #5503 BR $ - $ 234;000 4 Appleway Road Tshirley Road Hodges Road STP(U) $ 30,000 _5 216,000 5' Sth Avenue Havana Park Raad STP(U) $ 153,000 $ 1,136,000 Forker & 6 Sullivan Road North Ext. Progress Wellesley Ave. TPP $ 5,000 $ 327,000 7 Broadway Ave. Rehab. Bates Rd. Sullivan Rd. STP(U) $ 110,000 $ 812,000 8' Wellesley Ave. Rehab. Sunnyvale Rd. Ffora Rci. STP(U) $ 47,000 $ 344,000 9' Park Road Rehab. Sprague Ave. Broadway Ave. STP(U) $ 22,000 S 164,000 10 Dishman Mica ftoad Rehab. 1st Ave. Sprague Ave. STP(U) $ 7,000 $ 41,000 $ 617,000 $6,165,000 ' Projects deleted from 20b5 program due to lack of grant funding City of Spokane Valley Departrnent of Public Works DRAFT Amended 2005 Transportation Improvement Program zoos Primary Project From To Source City Amount Total Project 1 PineslMansfeld UVilbur Pines Road TPP $ 27,000 $1,101,000 Pines & Indiana Wesf Bflund Ramps 2 Valley Corridor Environmental Study University Rd. Evergreen Rd. STP(U) $ 19,000 $ 200,000 3 Barker Road Bridge at Spokane River Br_ #5503 BR S - $ 350,000 4 Barker Road Soone Spokane River AIP $ 558,000 $3,028,000 Br. 5 Applevray Boulevard Tsliirley Road Hocfges Road STP(U) $ 70,000 $ 513,000 6 8roadway Ave. Rehab. Bates Rd. Sullivan Rd. STP(U) $ 110,000 $ 813,000 7 Dishman Mica Road Rehab. 1st Ave. Sprague Ave. STP(U) $ 40,000 $ 176,000 8 Argonne Road Rshab. I-90 Montgomnry STP(U) $ 43,000 $ 317,000 9 Monlgomery Ave. Rehab. University Ave. Pines (SR 27) CDBG $ $ 440,000 10 Park Road - Project 2 8th Avenue 2ncE Avenue AIP S 63,000 s 300,000 11 18th Avenue - Project 2 Dishman Pulica Rcf SR 27 STP(U) S 21,000 $ 151,000 12 Evergreen Road 16th Avenue 2nd Avenue AIP S 4,000 $ 20,000 13 VaIIey Corridor- Project 2 University Evergreen STP(U) $ 96,400 $ 234,000 . $ 1,051,400 $ 7,643,000 ~-"njccts xnd timCframes identificd in the 1'[P arc to be considercd cstimate.s onty that mary thfinge duc to aNraricty of circumstrinces, tuid are not ~ .'tended by the City to be relied upon by pmperty owners or developers in rnaking development dccisions. Funded Projec#s Added Projects 2004 Carry Over Project llRUrT MinzU7'L+" S City uf Spokanc Valley City Council Rcgular iVleering Tuesday, April 12, 2005 Mtivor Wilhite called the iriceting Lo orcter at 6:00 p.m., and Nvels:omed ever?rone to the 64th meeting Atte►i(lance: t7iana Wilhite, Mayror T)3ve lvlercier, City Mariager Rich Munson; I7eputy v9ayror \'ina Repor, Deputy City ManaDer Dic.k Derictin}', Goumeilmember (arrive.d lat:e) Cary Driskell, Deputy City ACtorne), Mike DeVleming, Cour'icilmember Ken T"hompson, Finance Direct:or Mike Flanigan, Councilmember Cal Walker, Police Chief Gary Schimmels, Cowicilmember Marina Sukup, Community Development DirecCOr Steve Taylor, Councilmember Mike Jackson; Paeks and Recreation llirector \teil Kcrsten, PLiblic 1Vorks Director Steve Vlrorley, Senior Engine:er Greg "Sing" Binraman; 11' Specialist Chris 13ainbrictge, City Clerk LYVOCATIO\ Pastor Nianuel Denning, Fountain Niinist:ries =ave the invocation. FLEnGE OF 4L,LEGIANCL Mayor \kfilhite led the E'ledge of A17egiance. fZULL CALL City Clerk Bainbridge called roll; all Councilmembers were present except ~-1 Councilmember Denenny. It lvas nnnved by Depu1y A4ayor Mznrsotr, sccvnded by Coarncilmember FlUIIIgGIl, QI1CI 2.(ilQI111)tOLfSIy C117p!'OVeCJ JU exCdfSE COIO1C1I1)1L'1)IbG!" De)1e117']3, IU?III I7L' Ql'YIVC'S. Al'P120VAL QF AA'IFNDED AGLNI)A It wcrs nav>>zd b>> Councilnrember Def1leming arrd seco,uled by Coi.rncilnrenrber Flanrgcrn to approve the tmenciecl agcrtda as presentecl. City R9anager vlercier cxplainul that the rivo items which were independent action items setting public hearini dates; are now under the Consent F1€enda; as a result of receipt of an appeal to a Itearing examiner decision, item 8a ha,s been added for Couneil eonsideration; ancl lastly, an Executive Session has been added to cliseuss labor negotiations. Yote byAccltrinution: br Favor: Uitcrninrous, Opposecl_• 1\rUrre. Abslerltiorrs: 1\rnne. 1ilolion cui'rieel. INTRpnUCTIUN UF SI'ECIAI.: GLTESTS ANrU P1ZES.ENTATIONS Mayor 1Vilhite acl:nowledgctl and welcomed tlie Latier Day Saints l'ouLh Group attending tonight's meeting as parl of their citizenship rcyuirements. CO1V1A1[TTET, BQARD, :IAAiSON SUINT1V[r1.RY 1t1.I30RTS Councilmernber Schimmels: repoirted tNixt. he attended the Solid Waste Liaison F3oard meetin~ a few weeks ago where thcy conlinue to wol•k on routine business, and t:hat they have issucct a]Zequest for Proposals for a contractor and hope to Mave a report in about a month on that issue, Depucv Mayor Munson: stated t-ltat he attended Spokane 7'ransit ,Association Li;lit Rail Steerinj Cornmittee meeting last week and tllcy are moving fonvard with their cornmunity outreach, and plan to place kiosks in both malls with inforrnat:ion and questi4ns for the public on questions concerniilg how much the public may be willing to pay for liglic rail; that he also attended the kMayor's Ball Saturday night and expressed appreciation to the Valley Cliamber af Commerce for sponsoring the event. Cauncilmember Flanigan: announced tliat he also attended the Mayor's Ball and thanked Rick Wilhite for all his work. Council Meeting: 04-12-05 Page i of9 Approved by Cotmcil: DRAh Gouncilniember DeVlemin& mentionect he also attended and had a good timc at the Ma}'or's T3all. MAYOR'S REPORT . J~ ivtayor Wilhite reported klhat she attenclcd a change of coillmand 1"or the Naval 17eserve; and she also thanketl Mr. VVilhite for his assistance with the Mayror's Sall. PUi3L[C CUM11'TrNTS: No comments were offered. 1. CO\`SEN°C AGENDA Consists of items considered routine which are approvetl as a group. A Councilmcmber may remove an item from the Consent Agcnda to be considered separately. (Nofe: Council may entertain a mutit►n to waivc reading and 9pprove Consent Agcndx.) a. Approval of Regular CAUncil A7eeting M.im►tes of A7arch 22, 2005 b. Approval of Siudy Session Vfeeting Minutes of April S, 2005 c. Approval of Payroll of March 30, 2005 of $153,169.82 d. Approval of the FoIlowing Vouchers: VOUCHERLIST VOUCHER TOTAL D.1TT' Number(s) VOUGHF.R AMOU'N'1 03-18-05 6488-6514 55,265.33 03-28-05 6515-6528 12,932.10 04-04-05 6542-6591 less 6569) 97;130.16 04-04-05 6592-6593 210.00 GRnNA 'f0't'AL 195,53 7.59 e. 4. Proposetl Resolulion 05-003 Setting Public HeAring for Street Vacation STV 01-05 -f. -S-. Proposed Resolution 05-004 SetCing Public I-Iearing for Sl.reet Vacation STV 02-05 _ It tivas moved b►j Cnwacilnaember DeVlemin,g ayrd secontled hy Coirncilnieniber Flanib>un to ivaive tlie reuclirrg and nppro>>e the Ca7sent Agenda. Vate byAccla»ration: Irr Fcrvur: Ununimous. Oppo.red.-iVone. Abstentiorrs: Nvne. Alotiorr crn-ried. N7:VV BUSINESS 2. Seeond Keadinp- Fronosed Ordinance 05-014, Nuisance Cocle Amendment - Carv Driskcll After City Clcrk Bainbriclge ruad the ordinance citle, it ~vus naoved by Coittrcilmenrber Flunigaia and seconded by Councilmemher DeVleming ro adopt orclinc,nce 05-019. Tae.puty City Attorney Driskell briefly explained the background of this proposcd ordinance amendmenc, mentionecl that a violation could result in a S250 fine as a non-crirninal violation, and that there have been no changes to the proposed ordinance since the first reading. Ma?ror Williite invited publie comment; no comments were offered. Council discussion then ensued regarclinc the code enfarcement status of the properry tivhich prompted this action, possible similar situiicions on 8"` Avenue and Dearborn conccrning the storage of personal belongings in residential yartls, an<l if t}iere are other currenc ordinanccs which could Ue used to address this issue. Attorncy ]ariskell explainecl t}iat there are times code enforccment receives cnmplaints abnut what iippears to be garbage or junk in scameone's yard, but when approached, the resident asserts they are havina or preparing for a yard sale; and thitt it is his helief this ordinance will address that f}'pe of argument. Councilmember Taylor stated he feels the ordinance is over-regulating and will not support the change. Furtfier cliscussion included hdw to enforce the "no more dian three times in a calendar year" requirement and i1'that would be promoting neibhborhood discord; and that perhaps that clause should be stricl:en fram the ordinance. It was movec! Gy Depury Agcn;or Mcrnsan rnld secondecl by Cvurtcilrnentuer FIUIIlgI!!7 IO U71JL'i7CI II18 JlCIlflliTg nrotion to strike thnt sectioii in 3R which stutes "a- morc thun rlvee tirnes in otre culendar year. " I76te by Acclairlation to arrteird the motiotr: L7 Favor: t1IaJ%or Wilhite, Delluty Council lvtefting: 04-12-05 i'aee 2 of 9 Approved by Council: D12AF7' jlvIir►~nr Nlinrson, Councilmcirrbers Sclarnrnrels, Taylo,-, tnrd Flrrillgrnn. Opposed: Coia7c•illnember DcVleining; Absteiltions: il'ate. Motioir trpproved to ameriu' the nrarroil. Vote b)) Acclcinraliair o,a the ~ a»reirded n►utian tu approve the ordirrarrce strikitig the words "or nrore tl7crrr tl7ree thrres br one calendar yeur: " In Favor: Urrunrnrous. Opposed.• Alorre. Abstentiorr..s.• Norte. Ivlotion carried. Councilmember Denenny ai-rived at the mcecing. 3 Second lteadin * Pror►nced ]'3wn Broker Ordinance I)5-(117 - C91 R'alker/Cary Driskell After Ci[y Clerk Bainbridge read tFie ordinance title, il wCrS mOved I7y Uepui}+ Alcryar 11,11u7son arrd secot7cled by Corntcrlrirembcr I'larrigma to approve Ortli,7ance 05-017 regarding puwnbroker rep,ulations. Police Chief Walker gave a brief hackground of the ordinanc;e, and procee.ded to explain the changes in [he ordinance since the firsl: reading: removetl lhc requirement of obtainint a phot:ocopy of a person's driver's license ac cime of t:ransaction; and acldect a requirement thal a digital photo be taken of the perscm seeking to pawn tllc merchandise, which photo wauld then be transmitte.d to the Police by the followi»g day with the otller required informatiori; that all records reyuirett be t.ransmitted in computer fonnat so the police can quicl:ly do computer cross-reference checks to determine if items were reponed siolen; the reyuirement that business keep their own records nn eompul.er for a least three years was removed; and acldecl tliat recArds ma), be maintained in paper for7n; staff recommends remoaing die yearly fee as there does not appear co be a reason to chartie such fec and by not doing so, it would help otfset the cost to a business of taking digital photos. Chief VValker sdded that the palice deparlment will provide the necessary contputer training, and that there will be ag7tjce period of three months during which time no punit:ive sction will be taken against the pawnbrolcer for violations; but that tlie 11olice Depare►nent rna), require and enforce the penalty section for failing to provide the records of transac[ions. Mayor Wilhite invit.ed public comment. Bob Blum. 12722 East 15"': expressed satisfaction in taking Out the requirement of acquii•ing a photocopy of the person's identification document. Council and staff dist;ussed t:ransrnittina the digital photo ii'the owner did not own a computer; and Chie.f VJalker explainect that: some programs are neeessary and some people will have to purclj~~.sc some type of 1'hotoshop; but that the cost of doing so is small compared to t.he porential in losses. i%ote by Acclamnriorr: Ir? Fuva': Ilrruninrous. Oppased: Noiie. Ahstentiorrs: 1ltoyre. Aqation currierl. 6 Pronosed Resolution 05-005 Crcating, the Public Informatioii Officcr Yosition -Nina Ref-.or Taepury City vfanager ReDor explained the, backgrouncl leadin3 to the creatiqn of the position; the position description and prnpc,scd ,job classification; the benefits oi' hiring the Publie Lnfortnation O(7icer (Pl0): and that there have been no changes to the resolution since last rewiewed. It was moved by Cvxnrcilnrember Ue [lJeming trnd secorrded by Depirty Mtrtiur Mrmsuii !o upprove resoltrtioit 05-06 creatirlg the Public Informntion Offic.er. A9ayor Wilhite invited public comment. Bill Gothmann. 10017 Tast 48"': stated that he wants to make sure thai paths of communication remain open to firid out what the faccs are; that. Me wants a PIO to be an enabler to that process and not a roadblocl:er; anc! I:hat Nie feels hiring a P10 is brid public relations as it suggests there is something co hide althou~h he I:no~vs that is noc dhe intent. 7"ony Lazanis: stated that lie thou~ht all citizens need is truch ~~nd full disclosure fro►n council and management and he feels tliat is a pretty high priced position; said he doesn't bclicve we should hire public relations people or lobhyists to tell people the trLrth. ;j Bob E31um. 12722 East 15'h: said that he ,vronders afcer reacling the duties of the position, that if the almost 70 employees and council can't hijndle these dutics how one person could be expected to do so; that if money is availablc to hire; he'd feel better hirinb a human resource Aiialyst, c.ode enforcement officer, or Ccwncil Meeting: 04-12-05 Page 3 of 9 Appravc.d by CounciL• nRAr r t.raffc project manager fls those positions benefit the communicy; and lhat. a PIO is more or a benefit to council; that he feels CouncilmEmbcrs are already Hhe PIOs, and asks t11at the position not be approved because in so approvinQ, we would be diminishing the accomplishments by admitting we need spin / control. Mayor Wilhite invited fiirther public comment; no further comments were offered. Councilniember UeVlcrning stated that this position is not a public relations of.~{iccr but is a public information offeer; that Councilmembers are carrying ti ful] loatl with ot}ier tull-time employment, and attending boarc{ meetings iind committce meetings, and dhat he feels we need help in betling correct informaeion disseminated to the public. Councilmember 'I'aylor agreed and added that a mcssage from onc councilmember is limited and fragmentary as there are seven members of the council; that this is not about politics, but is about ensuring we have a consistEnk acc.urate flow of information coming from the city to be heard by all; that this PIO will not bc a lobbyist, hut will help deliver inFormation to other elected officials at the State arid County level. Deputy Mayor Munson said that no Councilmember or staff intends to be less readily awailablc to t}ie cornmunity; and that council and the City tiianager would never allow a P10 to spin an}qtting; adding that we pledge to provide t'he populaCion with accurate inrormation and we need a coordinator to help get the job dnne. Cauncilmember Flanigan stated his opposition to the posiiion; ancl seated that there have been several instances where if there had heen initial reactions to spe.cific issues like a tax issue, such would have been detrimental if we had had a P10 at that time; that he feels there is a need for dialogue amongst: council; that he is concerned at what point a PIO starts issuing slatements of the City's posi[ion; and diat he would rather usc the funds elsewhere. Councilmember Taylor said that a PIO does not issue posiCions or advocacy statements, but once Council's <<dvocacy is hirned into policy, that is when it would becorne public information. Councilmember Denenny agreed and sttitecl tihat part-time Councilmembers simply cannot get out as mueh as they would Iike, and that proper and cffective communication require.s a professional. Mayor Wililite also added that this position will serve as a henefil: to the cammunity as facts . are disseminated. Councilmember Schimmels said he would support the position but would prefer [he position be contracted out and if that does not work well, the process could always be, refined later. butc hy .Acclantation: Iri Fm,or: iVfayor A'ilhite, Deputv Mayor Afunsor7, Coimcilmembers ~Sclainr»7els, Taylor, DeVleiriing, und Denenny. ppposed: Coinrcilrrrember Flanigan. Ah: tentions: No,ie. Moaron carried Msyor Wilhite called for a short recess at 7:10 p.m.; and reconvened the meeting at 7:20 p.m. 7. Vlntinn Consideration: Conlract Approval, Pool Operation -1Vlike ,lackson Parks and Recreation Director Jackson explained that the YMCA was the only respondettt to this Reyuest For Proposals; he state,d that he toured their facilities and they looked at ours; that the funds are available in the 2005 budget; and that the Y woulct like to keep our copying costs separate (at a rate of about 30 a cop}'). .It was mvvetl by Couircilmember Flcnrigurt cuttl secorrded !o aulhor•i:e the City 1Vanager or desrgiaee to rregotiate arad execxrte a paol aperation arrd naainterrrnrce conrruct wrr{r the YMCA iVlayor Willlite invited publie comment; no corrirnents were offercd. Vute by Acclanaatiorr: Irr Fauor,- U~rnnimous. Opposed: Nane. Absleiiliatrs: Nutie. Aloliar carried 8. Molion Consideration: Contract Annrovul, Furnishings for CenterYl9ce - Steve Worlev Eaioineer Vl'orle.y reported that this issue is for approval considcration of a contract to provide furnicurc and fui•nishinps for the CenterPlace facility; and that he would like ta address twa retommended actions: one to authorize die City Manager to award and sign the contract, and the other to grant the City lvlanager an additional $50,000 in change order authority. v1r. Worley disteibuted copies and explained the bid tabulations and process; he also stated that not all bidders provided a price for every pricing group; that the hid was set up so bidders did not have to bid each group but if thcy did they had to bid every piece of equipment in that group. Mr. Worley mentioned that some bids were not consiclered responsive as they did not meet the specification reQuirements. In addition; Mr. Worley stated that when the bids Nvcre `-J rcccived, the price excced thc original anticipated budgeted amount; that staf[' reviewed the itenis whiclt Council Meetino: 04-12-05 Paee 4 of 9 Approved by Council: 1)RAr1' were bid and decided to try Go get the price closer to the original $300,004 estimated budget, and in cloing so staff reeommended reducing the ninnber of chairs by ] 00 and the numher of classroom tables hy about. 35; which brought the total recommended approval amount down to $339,572; through t:he process of developing the equipment and furnishinas for the Faeility, it was decided to make t:he dining room chairs in the great room and the classrqom chairs the same to make it easy to transfer chairs from c,ne raom to another basetl on the situation and need. Mr. Worley slso mentiorned that it was stiited in the bid package dhat staff reserves the right to acljust the quant'iCy oT each of the items based on the Cit'y's hudget; so bidders were submitting bids based on state.d quantii.ies with the Icnowledge that staff has the abilicy to rcduce it. if the bicts came in above budget. Mr. Worley mentioned that all of the classroonls will be completed in kecpinc, wi1Ji the previously council-approved change a•der io finish the set;ond floor t;lassrooms; and diat some of those classraoins will be leased to Spokanc Community College and thcy will provide their Qwm cla.ssroorn furnishings. Lt retard to the recluced number of tables and chairs, vl.r. 1'Jorley stated that if there are funds in the budoet once the project is cornplete, tind it appears additional tables and chairs arc needed, chere would be an opportunity tn purchase those items at a later dace. It tivus irioved bi< Mtryar Willrrte atrd secosrded by Courrcilrrrember Fltlrtigtar to tnvard und uutdiorize the ntrrrraker ro sigi? the contruct,s in the amotrnt o,f $339,572.65 fur the fu3-nisliin,g arrd _fiuv7irta-e jor• the Ce.nterl'lace I'roject as otrtlined in the attnched Finul Bid Recnnrmendation. Ma,yor 4Vilhite invited public cornmcnt; no comments were offerecl. Cauncilmember DeVleming requested that Council receive more information at a later daie to show the eritire budget for this project, including any other prejeetions oT fucure needs. Parl:s and Kecreation Director Jaclcson indicated he would `ather t:hat t1ata. ►lote ~y :1cc•lamatiun: ln Tavor•; U+7tnimous. O~~pvsEd: 1Vc»ne. Abstentions: Ararie. Motion c(rrrietl. City Manager Mcrcier said that f'or the secnnd part of this issue; that the change orcter auchority recomme,ndation is $50,000 and not the stated $100,000; and as thac bets drawn down, staff will seek C) Council rippro<<al t.o replenish that amount. It lvas n-loved by Dep:rry 11luycar Mur7son and secarrded by Courrcilme»iber• Flcurigair, to grant the City M.unager• ttrt additiolial $50,000 in chcuigf vrdcr nutjrorization. Ma}ror Wilhite imrited public comment; iio comrnents were alrered, V'ote bi+.Acclanr(rtroi7: Irr FcrnUr: U+lanimuus. Oppused: Nvne. flbslentiorrs: 11lone. Morion cari•iect. 8a. 1'lotion Consideration:SettinE! Clnsed Record Hearing on 4nne.i1 \'umbcrs APF 0145 and 02-05 Depuiv Ciry Atiorney Driskcll recommencted twro separate motions, although one 11caring eould be held to consolittate the issues as both relate to the same land use decision, and will be the same record t.o ne considered by Cowicil. Iqe furtlier explained that this issue is iis a result of a decision macle by the 1-Iearing T.:xamincr and of subse_quent receipt of application by a landowmer co appeal that decision; that some neighbors in addition to the property owner wcre clected to appeal that decision; that the ne.xt step in the process is cn set a date to hold a closed record public hcaring to be held before Council; tliat it would be a closed recoi•d as the record has already been established before the 1-learing Examiner. It 1+10.s moved Uy Depzay ltlcryur Munsun tmd secofrded by CotoacibraenaGer Fltrnigarr tv gratrt a closed record hearrit$ 1o be hern'd rio ltrter tharr .hurte 14, 2005 i►? j•efererrce to aJ)peal niumber APP 01-05. Ilote hy Acclamation: br Favvr: Unarrinlous. Opposed- Norie. Abstentic»7s: None. Alotion carried. It Wus cheit moved by Depun+ Uayor hIurrsun artd secorrdecl by Cowicillnenaher Flcrnigan to grairt rr closed record 17e(rring to tuke place iao late.r thrnl Ji.ore 14, ?OOS nn a~~peo! nturtber APP 02-05. Vote hy Acclantation: hr Favor: Unanimnus. Ol)posetl; Nvne, Abslerriians: 1lrone. Mniion curr-iEd. Councilmember [aenenny tisked when Council Nvould receive infoi`iiiation on this in order to prevent unknowingly receiving communicatiAn nr contact With those involved. Attorney Driskell intiicated he will advise Council tomorro«r on who the parties are so Cbuncil would not unwittingly partake in any ex-parte communication, since dhis matter is a quasi judicial macter. PiJ13i.:iC CO1V]l1'IENUS There were no comments offered. Council MCtUng: 04-12-05 Page 5 of9 Approvcd by Council: DRAF1' AI1M]1VIS1"RAT1VE RrFORTS: [no public commcnt] 9Watershed Manap-emcnt Plan Preseotiition - Scott Kuhfa/Rob LindsxY i.,ong Rangc Planner Kuhta explained that tonight's presentation dcals with an ongoino watershed planning process f'or the Lirtle Snokane River and die Middle Spokane. River, t►Iso k.nowm as WR[A 55 and 57 respectively. Mr. Kuhta introduced Rob I,indsay, Spokane C;ounty Water R.esources Manager, and Reanette Boese, Spokane County Groimdwater FrograUn Coordinatnr, to qssist in the presentaCion; addirlg that Spokane Countl' is the leacl agency for lhis planning proccss. Mr. Kuh[a gave some baclcgroUmd information on the issue as noted on his April 12, 2005 Rcquest for Council Aclion fornl. M.r. K.utita then gave his YowerPoint prescntation, and mentioned that. these projecu are connected because there is a connection or exchange of water in the aquifers. Mr. Kuhta stat:ed that this is a volun[ary participation process; that dhis process has been ongQing, and that the steps are (1) arganization of the plannino unit; (2) eollecting tfaG3 and assessment; (3) planneci development anc{ approval stage [Che eurrent stage]; and (4) plan implerne.ntatinn. He stated that the nlanning unit must approve the Plan and we can choose to be a part of that planning, unit and have a representat'ivc partic.ipate anct vrote on l3ehalf of the City; that there must be consensus of all members of the Planning Unit or a consensus of the government members plus a majorit), vote of the non-government members to appmve the Plan. Once approved, the Plan goes to the County Legislative authorities (Spokane County, Fend Oreille County, and Stevens Count:y) fpi• approval from each authority. If the Plan is iiot approved, it rr►ay be sent back once to the Pla.nning Unit for revisions and tfien resubmitted to the Legislative Authority. Aften+,ards, i1' the County Legislative authority does not grant approval, the project entls. ti1r. Kuhta explained that there are rivo elements of ihe Plan: water yuantity and how it is used now itnd plans for fi.►ture use. Nlr. Kuhta stated t:hat: there is a recommended instream flow of a cereain minimum amount of water in the streams in order to sustain fish; that the Plan is proposing an instream flow recommendation of 500 cubic feet ner second in the Barker Road are_a, which ha.c been determined to be the mini_murn amount that ca.n susta'►n raiiibow trout. Mr. I:uhta explained that i'urther study is , recommended further downstream in the river; and then explained the recommended actions; and said if we obligate ourselves chrough this t'lan, we must follow through with that commitment. Mr. K.uhta stated that at this point, we have not comrnitted to any part of this 1'1an through funds or staff resources, or otherwise; except the possibility of future participation nn commirtees. If adopted, Spokane Caunty will be obligated, hc explained to implernent this Plan. Deputy yiayor Munson asked Lhat in 2003, thc federal government commissioned a study to ciefne thc aquif'er; and as the aquifer is a major part of the watershed plan; how can such a plan be devised if the definition of the aquifer has not yet been dctermined? vlr. I:,indsay stated that that question is part of a larger questiori: that there arc many facets to this in addition to the interstate ayuifer stud_y; which is only nokvjust undenway; that this Pla.n began years prior to that stucly along witli other entities doing their own study, such as Avista, and the Wasliington Deparunent Of Ecology's (DOE) Total Maximum llaily T oacl (TMDL) study; he said that this Plan is just the first step in identif},ing where the water is available and where it will be neede<I iri the future, and lo plan for those needs. This Plan; he explained, also addresses water conscrvation, and said it will incorporate adaptive manaaemenl, and that the entire process is intencled to build on itself and as additional information eomes to light, the Plan will be modiiieci to incorpqrate such aclditional information. Mr. Lindsay sfated that the Interstate Aquifer Study just cornpleted their first round of data collection last summer; and that inPormation is only now being gency, it does not analyzed as a part of the Plan. Vlr. Lindsay explained that tifiile the County is the lead au have any more influence over this Plan thaii any other participat.ing entit}; and once this 1'lan is adopted by the Counties, the clock starts and thcre will t11en be an additional year of focusecl implementation planning to actually prioritize the recommendations lisked and identify what will be. clonc. The intent of the Ylan at this point; he continucd, is to provicle tlic initial thinking on the "wlio" and the "when" and not necessarily the "how;" which will be addressed in the year followinb plan adoption. Mr. Lindsay stated that therc is ample lleaibility in the Plan to st.art implementing some measures which would not require additional costs and -which CAII be hancllecl with available sttlff; and while moving fonvard with chose Council vleeting: 04-12-05 Paoe b of 9 Approved by Council: llILA~'T aspects, Che planning unit can develop a more focused and st:rategic approach to olhcr rr►essures such as ~ water conservation. Mr. Lindsay added that: Spokane County seafF Would be happy co c.orne to a study session or other council format to have further exchange on this issue, and reminded Council that participation in this plan is voluntary. Deput~y Ma)ror Munson state(i his prefertncc tO iOlloNv up with Spokane Valley Ciqr staff; and chat of his concern about timing issues and resources that this Plaii is askinD to provide. Councilrnember DeVleming; speaking from his Vcra Water and Powc.r experience, stated that tliis F'lan has been wrell tliought out with tremendous contribution, and he is comfortable with the participation and suggests Council cornpl), with chc Plan; recogniiing that approval of the Plan tonight is not the inCent. Mayor 4Vilhite mentioned the. "t.hree toucli rule" and t.hat this Plaii conLairis extensive infonnation to digest in one session; she stated sHie feels Couriciltnembers will have additional questions, and appreciates Mr. Lindsay's willinLmcss to have fur[ber exchange on this topic. City vlanager Mercier inquired if it might be beneficial to check with the parcicipatin- political jurisclictioiis to determine whether they feel it is prudenc to pursue this Plan in parallel with the worlc being done with ehe TMT)t.., or if it is a sequential arrangernent which should be considered; that in listening to comments from jurisdictions affectcci by the Departrncni of Ecaldgy's TMDL stutly, that suggest.s to Mr. Mercier tha! the outcome will have the mosi cUSt consequenees to each of those jurisdictions; and in comint to a determination of what might be allowable uses pf tlhat %vaterway; is a consideraiion of flo-w ratcs and other elements, in this I'lan; and that he would be hesitant to have any plan going on now to come to conclusion in advance ofi the more monLmlencal jud?ment on the TM7L; and asked when %va..5 t}le lasi visit with each of the eleci.ed representstives of dte political jurisdictions p3rticipating; and he 1'urther asked what might be dle appropriate approach; whel.l7er time-phasecl, or sequential c,r otlle.rwise; of this efi'ect compared tn thzjt ,.vorf: in analyzing capacities for the Spokane Kiver. Councilmember laenenny adderl ?hat all the major carnponents of these studies will irnpact the mtijor decision on how to address Nvastewater treatme.nt in r~ this community; and if such issue is not resolved; other eonscquences mifzht follow, keeping in mind that: water ilow «<ill have a substantial impact on this issue. Councilmember Flanigan; in lool:ing at the question of whether [o participate in this Plan, statecl he sees no alternative cxcept to participale, be.cause lack of partieipation could have futuu-e manciates for our steps wir.l,out us having any voice in those decisions. T'urther discussion continued on timelines, nccessary decisions, chronology of sCeps, the ceitical importance of havino t:liese exchanges with affectecl entities; TN117L issues, quantity and yuality, and instream recammeiidations bascd on the needs of fish in dhe Barker Road area. Mr. Linclsay stated that as I110fE informatian is collected in the downstreatn section of the lower Spol:iuie River (particularly from 1..atah Creek throuah Lake Spok7ne), and following the deve.lopment oi' the TV1.[al.,, the. Planning Unit wo4ild thei? come up with a recommendation for flow, makinQ such recomniendation from inpiit from all eniiiies iiivolved. He stated that ciifferent timeJines are falling into plaee at different rates; thac chis Plaii has its owm tinieline Nvhich must be met regarding this proccss; and that when funds wexe accepted in 1998, ihat set the timeline in proccss; and at this point, we have exceedec! thc timeline ofwhen this should have heen moved fonvard for adoptian, as have mosc all ot.he.r WT2As within the State; that they are cognizant of the ir►volving iSsues and sn•essed thiit tllis Plaii deals witly quantihi issues with conservatiqn being a top priority achieved through education. Mr. I.indsa_y explained that they have a meeting scheduled for early Nfay to incorporate comments received from 1he involved entities; ancf iclcally ttiey would like t:o vote for approval Qf the Plan, by the Planning Unit, in mid to late May; and if approved, will proceed to the cnunties foi' apprnval consideration. Mayor Wilhite statetl her desire for morc time to furcher cfiaest the Plan. Councilmernber 1=lanigan said he feels if %ve am-ee tn part:icipate, that will enable. Council further time to study the Pl3n. Mr. Mercier said th7t if the timeframe is mid to late 'May, keeping in mind tlle Cauncil's three-touch rule, diat Nvou put ' lhe issue again on Council's agenda about five (Lays hefore a vote nn accepting the entire PIaun. Mayor Willlite statecl that after Council has had more time to fiuther rcad the P1an, this issue citn bc placed on an Council Meeiino: 04-12-05 Page 7 of 9 Approved by Couneil: nRAFT upcoming agendri. Councilmcrnber Deneniiy added his concern that keenin;; in mind all those entities im7olved wiih wastetvater treatment, that he feels sucM a vote cannot lie taken for Plan anprnval becausc of all the pending wastewater issucs. Council determined this issue will be brought back on an upcomina, agenda for further discussion_ 10. Commercial llevelopmenl Perrnit Process Flowchart - Ni»a Regor Tacputy Cit), Manager Regor explainecl that the purpose af t.his issue is t4 summari2c thc aet:ivities and draR recdmmenclations in the commercial development permit process_ and to make recommendations and suggestions for improvement ancl the nexc st:eps in the process; keeping in mind that the permit process is a work in progress. Ms. Regoe also acknowledged the involvement of numerous staff in this process, of the recommendation to hire one additicmal permit spccialist, anct pnce that: person has heen hired, to desiSnaie one of the permit specialists as a lead permit specialist/project caordinatpr for the commercial development apFalications. She mentioned that die existing fees received are more ihan nudgeied and would cover the cost of a new pUSition, allhough staffi has not completed a full cost recover_y analysis. After DepuCy City Manager Regor's PowerPoint presentat:ion, discussion issues includect customcr scrvice in general and specifically how 311 3CICIltl0178I pQSItIQII wIII AICI in a srnoother proee5s; of the apparent consnvction boom; the current pace a.nd h-end of development activity; and the current staff process. Council determined thac staf( should move forward co bring this issue back for motion consideration to authorize the position; in that a coordinator positiai is imporiant to further refne our customer seivice process. 11. Yronusea Budget amendment Discussion - Ken Thompson Finance L7irector Thompson discussed sorne of the proposcd amendments to the 2005 buclbet as shown on the accompanying exhibit A, adding that this is a summary of the individual items proposed. Nir. Thornpson alsa meiitioned that the "preservation project" item under Street Capital Projects lias been deleted and is not necessary. lvir. Thompson staled thal ifi Council is saiisfed with the list, staff can retu.rn Co cnuncil wilh a prepared amendment to 1:hc 2005 budget and asks Council to schedule a public hearing for April 26, 2005. Mr. `9ercier added that staff is attempting to schedule a Finance Committee meeting prinr ro the public hearing, and at thai 1=inance Committee mc.eting, he will also discuss the idea of creating a civic building fund as an investment in a City Hall or Police Department or other needed building. It ivas moved by Councilinember I)eYleming and ,seconded by Councilmernber Deneriny to huve stuff prepcire the amended budRet ordirrrnice and schedule a public laeariitg. Tjnte ky Acclumutiori: ln t%m7nr.• l.Inanimous. Oppased: 1\Fotie. Abs1enlions: t`lone. Aqotiorr currietl. 1.2. Storaee °Cank 1'rovisions - Tom Scholtens Building Uffcial ~choltens explaitied chst Spokane Valley is located over a solersouree aquifer whicll re:yuires protection from potential contamination; that a potenYially serious threat of coritamination is posed by the use, handling and scoragc of critic:il materials, and tirithouc provisions for spill containrnent, both above ground ajid underground tanks containing critical materials present a potentially serious ehreat to the aquifer. He fur[her explained that Spokane CAUnry adppted standards for storage of critical materials, and while we adopted many provisions of the Spokane County Code, these were not among those adoptecl, Mr. Scholtens staied that apublic hearino for this issuc is scheduled Tor the Spokane Valley Planning Commission for April 28, 2005. After brief discussion, it Nvas Council consensus that N9r. Scholtens move fonvard as expeditiously as possibly. EXE,CU`I'IVE SESSION It lvar mvved bv Deputy A41V0r A!I1lI7S0l1 and seconderl by liqayor Wi!hite, to e.ztend flre nreeliilb to approxiniutely 9:30 p.m. to accom»aodate rna executlve session, arrd to c.>>ater ititu L'XECUIlve se,s.sron to drscuss labor negotiatrons. Vote hy Acclcrnratiorr: In F~avor.• Uncrfainrotts. Opposed: Atone. Abstelrtrons: iVpite. etqotioi7 carried Mayor Wilhite explained that the executive session should last approximately 30 minutes; that if it takes longcr they will come back ttn(i makc an announeement; and regardless if it takcs more or less Cime, chey will atljourn without any further busincss. Council ivieeting: 04-12-05 Page 8 of 9 Approved by Council: DRt1FT Council adjourned into executive session at 8:58 p.m., Eind ended executive session at 9:33 p.rn. h tivas O nro>>ed by Cowreilmemher Flanigarr, secorrd&I by Deprary M~cryor Mun.so«, and rtftoninrorrslY cr,;r-eed upon to adjourn. Tl,ere being no f:Il'IjlE)' GtLS117CSt', the meeting rrdj~iw-ner.l cr19: 34 p. rrr. 17iana Wilhite, yiay0r f1'T'TE ST: Christi»e T3ainbridge, City Clerk ~ Council A9ecting: 04-12-05 Page 9 of 9 Approvect by Council: ~ CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY ~-JRequest for Council Action Meeting Date: 04-26-05 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: x consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Payroll for Period Ending April 15, 2005 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: ~ OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Payroll for period ending 4-15-45 Salary: $ 100,496.02 Benefits: $ 10,583.08 $ 111,079.10 STAFF CONTACT: Daniel Cenis ATTACHMENTS ~ CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 4-26-05 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: x consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information [l admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the F0ll0wi11g Vouchers: BACKGROUND: VOlJC1-1E1t LIST VOUC1-1F,1t TQTAL DA'CE Number(s) VOUCHER AMOUNT 04-08-05 6594-6625 342,551.79 04-15-05 6626-6665 416,234.26 GR,AND 'I'0"I'AL 758;786.05 RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Approve claims for vouchers: BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: Mary Baslington ATTACHMENTS Voucher Lists ~ vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 0410812005 2:32:52PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptionlAccount Arnount 6594 418/2005 000197 AIR 78248 EMPLOYEC BACKGROUND CHECK 25.00 Total : 25.00 6595 4!8l2005 000120 AWC EAAPLOYEE BENEFITS'f'RUSI' 04-06-05 AWC 11Aantz AWC EMPLOYEE BENEF175 1,061.44 Total : 1,061.44 6595 4/812005 000235 B&B SMREDDING '17149 SWCtEDD1NG SERVICE 45.04 Total : 45.00 6597 4/812005 000508 CONOCOf'HILLIPS FLEET 87016-6725 VkHICLE FUEL CH6IRGES 450.67 Tota I : 450.67 6598 4f8/2005 000743 CROWN MOVING CO., INC. 09-12392-5 MOVING COSTS 411J5 Total : 411.75 6599 4/8I2005 000060 DENENNY, RICHARD 04/06/05 DD Reimb. REIMB. 7RAVEL/MILEAGE 273.78 Total : 273.78 6600 4/812005 000686 DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING 04lU$/05 DOL Cash CASH TRANShAITTAL TO DOL 82.00 Total : 82.00 6601 4f8/2005 000724 FAULKNER, JASON 0I105l05 JF Reimb. REIMB. MOVING EXF'ENSES 2,000.00 Total : 2,000.00 6602 4/612005 000609 GF_Nf]RQNS, CO. -1017 40471 DIRF_CT REA[7 f70b & ATTACH. KIT 238.65 Total : 238.65 6603 4/8/2005 000071 GOLMAN, SUE 04/04l05 SG Reimb. Pd11SC. REIMB - SUE G. 31.31 Total : 31.31 6604 4l812005 000007 GRAINGER INDUS7RIAL SUPPLY 1300-644106-0 40469 OFFICE SUPPLIES 56.11 Total : 56.11 6605 4l8/2005 000070 INIAND POWER AND UGHT CO 3/15-3/30/05 IP&L STREET POWER LIGHTIiJG CHAf2G 377.68 Total : 377_66 6606 4f812005 000117 JOURNAL NEWS PUBLISHING 25973 /1DVERTISING 46.50 ` r J ~ r - vchlist Ve•~ ~ r List Z 04I0812005 2:32:52PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Vaucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptionlAccount Amount 6606 4f8/2005 000117 JOURNAL NENJS PlJE31.IS!•IING ((;ontinued) 25974 ADVERTISING 41,25 25975 ADVERTI SI N G i 14 , 00 25976 ADVNRTISING 117.00 25977 ADVEf2Tl S I NG 72.00 Total : 390.75 6607 4!$12005 000258 MICF2C7FLEX IfJC. 000015594 TAX AUlal7 PROGI2AM 302,70 00015587 'i'AXTOOLS SQF7WARE REN'I'AL 559.23 Total : 661.93 6608 4/8/2005 000132 MODERN ELECl'RIC WATER COMPANY 03130/05 Moderri Elec 57REET LIGH7ING POWER/WATEF 6,715.82 Total ; 6,715.82 6609 4/812005 000484 MOONEY & C'UGH CONTRAC70RS INC. 44-001 2l28J05 40176• PROJEC7 BILLING A7 CENTERPI.A 283,107_00 7otal : 283,107.00 6610 418/2005 000239 NORTHWEST BUSINESS STAPAp 53283 40476 NAME &PC)SI710N F'L/1'fES 30.22 Tntal : 30.22 6611 41811005 000193 NOR'I'I-IWEST CHRIS'1'IAN SCHOpLS May 21105 F7ent MAY 2005 REN7 21,357.49 Total : 21,357.49 6612 4B/2005 000121 NORTNWEST MAILING INC 13354 POSTAL MACMINE MAINT. AGREEA 537.08 Total : 537.08 6613 418/2005 000058 OCCUPATIpNAI_ MEDICINE, ASSOCIATE A500163 3/31105 EMPLOYMENI' pMYSICAL 101.00 Total : 101.00 6614 4l8/2005 000119 PIP PRINTING 13330029808 40466 BUILDING pIVISION FORMS 730.70 Total : 730.70 6615 4/812005 000494 PRO PEOPLE STAFl=1NG SERVICES IVCl1UO00QQ(.tl) 411105 'rEMPORARY ENPLOYMENl' SERVI 480.76 Total : 480JG 6616 4/8I2005 000256 RAIN(30W ELECTRIC IMC 118775 ELEC'f'RICAL LABOR R MATERIALS 87.00 Total : 87.00 • Page: 2 vchlist VoucFier List Page: 3 0410812005 2:32:52PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptionfAccount Amount 6617 4J812005 000024 RESOURCE COMPUTING ING 36673 17 SUPPORT/WEI3I5ERVER MAINT. 2,387.00 Total : 2,387.00 6618 41812005 000744 ROOKS, B. TODp 04104/05 Refund REFUND FOR PUD FEES 1,875.00 Total : 1,875.00 6619 418l2005 000733 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 071376 44467 CISCd SMARTNET EXTENDED SEF 2,743.83 Total : 2,743.83 6620 4/8l2005 000745 50UTH TERRACE SPOKANE, LLC 04l05r05 Refund REFUND PERMIY FEE OVERPAYME 44.00 ' Total: 44.00 6$21 418l2005 000090 SPOKANE COUNTY INFORMATION, SYS 50405 POWERPOIN7 CI_ASS 95.00 Total : 95.00 6622 4/8/2005 000658 SPOKANE COUN'TY SUPERIOR COUR7 411l05 Juror fees JUROR CHARGES 69322 Total : 693.22 8623 418/2(}05 000167 VER/1 WATER & POWER QODi-031971.02 STREET POWER IICHTING CHARC 78.99 0001-032805.00 Sl"REET POWER LIGHTINGIWATEf 15.48 002-001425.01 STREEl' POWER LIGHTING CHARG 172.13 Total : 270.60 6624 41812005 000680 WASHINGTON TRUST BANK, MOONEY f 2308570772 ESCROW RETAINAGE PAYMENT 14,900.00 Tntal : 14,900.00 6625 4/812005 000706 WSAP7, MELODY RUCCI, TREASURER 04108105 Kathy TRAINING - KATWY CUMMINGS 90.00 Total : 90.00 32 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 342,551.79 32 Vouchers in tfiis report Total vouchers : 342,551.79 ~.3 _ J ~ ~ J vchlist ~ Vc,~~ ~8r List ~r ge: 4 04l08I2005 2:32:52PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apb8nk Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount I, the undsrsigned, do cerilry under penaliy of peijuiy, that the rnaterials have bean fwnished, lhe services rencfered. Qr the Iabor perfurmcd as described herein and that the claim is jusl, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and ihal I am authorized to auihenNrate and certify to said daLn. Finarue pireclor Date Page: 4 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 04115I2005 11:35:52AM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptionlAccount Amount 6626 4115/2005 000037 AMERICAN LINEN 606722 FLOOR MAT SERVICE 45.82 Total : 45.82 6627 4/15/2005 000030 AVISTA UTILITIES 410069444 4/1105 STREET I_IGHTING/SIGNRL PCIWEF 17,461.69 . Total: 17,461.68 6628 4/15/2005 000101 CDWC RQ05483 40475 NEC F'RQ,IECTOR LAMP 414,54 F2F244429 40480 CAT5E PATCH CABLES 29711 Total: 711.65 6629 4115I2005 000109 COFFEE 5Y5'fEMS INC 29503 COFFEE SUPPLIES 145.50 Total : 145.50 6630 4/1512005 000506 COlUM81A FIBER SOLUTIONS 3856 4/11105 DARK FIBER LF_ASE 32.55 Total : 32.55 6831 4/1512005 000284 CRUCIAL 7ECHNOLOGY 207484625 40482 SOFTWARE UPGRADE-MCCORMIC 62.08 Total : 62.08 6632 4/1512005 000683 I]AVID EVANS 8 ASSOCIA7ES 167010 40390 TR1IFFIC ENGINFERING SERVICEc, 5,960.21 167011 4(}448 INTERSECTION LOS ANALYSIS 16,217.57 Total : 22,177.78 6633 4I1512005 000136 DEPARTMENT OF INFO SERVICES, STA' 2005030233 57A7G I'1' SERVICES 41.65 Total : 41.65 6534 4115/2005 000171 GF_IGF-R CORRF-CI'ION5 CtN`1'ER 2/05 Geiger Corr. GEIGER PROCRl1MS FOR 3105 4,201.38 Total : 4,201.38 6635 4/1512005 000505 H& H FINANCIAL SERVICES 147 COPI[R LEASE PAYMENT 412.30 Total : 412.30 6636 4/1512005 OOp434 MU5FLOLN, BARRY 04/11105 8H Reimb. REIMf3. 1=1RE CUDE CCFi'i'IFICA710r 160,00 Total : 160.00 6637 4/1512005 000388 IRVIN WATER bIS7. #6 112500.0 3105 WATER CMAf2GE5 165.00 ~ i ; ; ~ vchlist - Voucner List ~r-age: 2 0411512005 11:35:52AM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank VoueNer Date Vendor Invoice PO tt DescriptfonlAccount Amount 6637 4/15/2005 000388 000388 IRVIN WATER DIST. #6 (Conlinued) Total : 165.00 6638 4115/2005 000117 .1QURNAI. NF_WS PUBLISHING 261110 AI7VERTISING 27.75 26011 ADVE1271SING 60.75 26012 ADVER71 SI N G 90.00 16013 ADVERTISING 101.25 Total : 279.75 6639 4/15f2005 000033 MCPC 4699140 TEKNION MOUN7ING BRACKETS 267.01 Total : 207.01 6640 41i5/`2005 000013 NEOPOST, I14C. 41932847 POSTAGE METER REtJ7AL 325.50 Total : 325.50 6641 4115/2005 000239 NORTHWEST BUSINESS STnMP 53342 40478 NAME 8 F'OSI'i'ION PLATES 56.15 Total : 56.15 8842 4115f2005 000652 OFFICE [7EP07 282110259-001 40452 Of=FICE SUP('LIES 47.13 282173569-001 40470 OFFICE SUPnLIES 707.26 40470 282173569-001 40473 OFFICE SUPPLIES 97.92 40473 Total: • 852.31 6643 411512005 000307 OFFICE OF THE STATE TRGASURER 03131l05 State STATE REMI'fTANCES 87,528.08 Total : 67,528.08 6644 4/15/2005 000891 OLSTEN 61430387 TEMP. EMPI.OY. SERVICES-S7'EMN 580.00 Total : 580.00 6645 4/1512005 000494 PRO PEOPLE STAFFING SF_RVICE5 249 TEMPQRARY EMPLOYMENT SERVI 453.09 Total : 463.09 6646 411512005 000341 RICOaI CORPOFtA710N 05057090225 CpPIER RENTAL PAYMEM7 246.30 05057090679 COpIE12 RENTAL PAYMF_NT 412.30 05057110847 COPIER RENTAL PAYMENT 236.70 Total : 897.30 Page: 2 vchlist Voucher List Page: 3 04115/2005 11:35:52AM Spokane Valley Bank code : 3pbatlk Voucher Date Vendor Invoicc PO# Description/Account Amount 6647 4/1512005 000702 121SK MANAGEMENT 03131105 Jury Ins. JURY INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE 47.35 Total : 47.35 6648 4J15/2005 000415 ROSAUERS U-CITY 481237 COUNCIL MEETING SUPPLIES 9.88 548876 COMtv1UNl`i'Y MEF-71NG SUPPI_IES 18.90 ' Total: 28.86 6649 411512005 000202 SCAPCA 3019 ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FEE/2ND O 29,729.50 Total : 29,729.50 6650 4115!'C1U5 004230 51'OKANF CN'I"Y AUbl'CORS OFC, RECO 418105 Rec Fees COUNTY RECORDING FEES 1,099.00 Total : 1,099.00 6651 4/1512005 000172 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 05-44 COUNTY ENGItJEERING SERVICES 13,561.60 05-45 COUNTY ENCINEERING SERVICES 231,774.39 Total : 245,335.99 6652 4l1512005 00D090 SPOKANE COUNTY INFORMATION, SYS 50404 CITREX LICENSE FEE/GLORIA MAt 260A0 , Total : 260.00 6653 4/15/2005 000700 SPOKANE COUNTY PARKING, ENFORCf 03131105 Juror JUROR PARKING CHARGES 178.23 Total : 178.23 6654 4/1512005 000308 SPOKANE COUNIY PROSECUTING, ATl 3l05 Pros. Attomey CRIMF VIC7IMS COMPENSATION 1= 991.04 Total : 991.04 . 6655 4115/2005 000323 SPOICANE COUNIY U'i'ILI'I'IES 4/1l05 Sewer charges SEWER CHARGES 725.84 Total : 725.84 6656 4I1512005 000731 SPOKANE RESTAURAN'f' EOUIP., INC 04-005 #2 4l1/05 KITCHEN EQUIP. CENTERPLACE P 15,839.70 Total : 15,839.70 6657 4/15/2005 000488 SUKUP, MARINA 04113/05 MS Reimb. GUIDE TO ZONING 27.95 Total : 27.95 6658 4115/2005 000093 THE SPOKESMAPI-RF_VIFW 42365 ADVERTISING 504,72 Tota I : 504.72 3 . .i ` vchlist " Vo~~~~Cr List Page: 4 0411512005 11:35:52AM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptionlAccount Amount 6659 4115P2005 000646 U.S. Pb57AL SERVICE, NEOPOST POST 04/15l05 Postaye POSTAGE 2,010.06 Total : 2,010.00 6660 4/1512005 000337 UPS 0000Y3F950155 SHIPPING CHARGES 16.47 Total : 16.47 6661 4/1512005 qp0187 VFRA WATER 8 POWER 0004-0(10755.01 STREET POWER LIGHTING CNARG 767.75 0005-016348.01 S7RFET POWER LIGHTING CF-{ARC 60.80 0006-033021.00 STREET PpWF_R LIGHTING/WA1'NF 19,65 0007-017753.01 STFlEET PQWER LIGHTING/WATF_F 17,25 0(l(lti-010790.01 STREE7 POWER LIGHTING CFiARG 57.09 Total : 322.54 6662 4/15/2005 000066 WEST COAST PAPER 4130182 40486 OFFiCE SUF'PLIES 64.66 Total: 84.68 6663 4115J2005 000021 WITHERSPOON, KELLEY, DAVENPOf2T ~ 121782 LEGAI PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 779.20 Total : 779.20 6664 4l15/2005 000667 WSDOT, ENGWEERING PUBLICATIONS 04/13105 WSUOT f'ub_ 40489 WSQOT LOCAL AGENCY MANUAL 75.00 7otal : 75.00 6665 4/15/2005 000089 XO COMMUNICATIONS 0104834116 I'EI_Ef'MONEfDSL CHAh2GES 1,371.61 Total : 1,371.61 40 Vouchers for bank code : apb2nk Bank total : 416,234.26 40 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 416,234.26 Page: 4 vchlist VouCher List Page: 5 0411512005 11:35:52AM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Involce PO # DescriptionlAccount Amount I, ihe undersigned, do certify under penafly af perjury, 4hat ihe msteriAis have been furnished, the servioes rendered, or the labor Nerfom►ed as described herein arid t7i at tlie clairn (s just, due and an unpaid obtipation against the City of Spokane Valley, end that I am authorized to authenticate and certify to said claim. Finanr,e OlreCtor Date , CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: April 26, 2005 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report X pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Proposed Amsndments to the 2005 Budget GOVERNING LEGISLATION: State law requires a public hearing and an amendment to our budget when we believe vre will excend our appropriations. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: The City budget for 2005 was adopted in November of 2004. At the February 2005 retreat the city council directed staff to prepare amendments ta the 2005 budgEt for additional personnel and programs needed to complete the 2005 budget year. The city council discussed these amendments to the 2005 budget on April 12. 1'he Finance Committee of the ci#y council me't on April 18, 2005 to review these amsndments. ~ BACKGROUND: Amendments to the 2005 budget are needed to: 1.} update the budget for programs and projects carried over from 2004 into 2005; 2.) reflect the addition of employees to rnaintain service levels; 3.) transfer funds for use in street mainfenance and capital projecis; 4_) reserve funds to maintain operating service levels, to set aside monies for civic buildings and to prepare for extraordinary weather conditions; and 5.) update the 2005 budget for changes in capital projectstprograms. A more detailed listing of the proposed budge# amendments is attached as exhibit A. OPTIONS: Options include amending the budgef, arnending the budget for some of the changes and making no amendments. The budget should be amended to comply with Washington State law. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: A motion to forward the ordinance to the tJiay 10, council meeting for a second reading is recommended. BUDGETlFINANCIAL IMPACTS: Passage of this ordinance will provide the budget authorization to move ahead with these programs and projects. STAFF CONTACT: Ken Thompson, Finance Director I nr~FT C11'Y QF SFOKANF VAT,LEY SPOKANE CUITN'I'1', WASH]NGTQN QRn.iNA1\TCE NO. 05-018 AN OltD1i1ANCE UF THE C1TY Ol+ SF'QKANF, VAi.,TrEY, SYUICANE COUNTY, WASHTTTGTnN, ,a.M_E\TL7LITG 0RllliNA1VCE NO. 04-044 PASSFD TiY THE Cll'1' COUNCCL ON NQVEN1I3rR 9, 2004 ANT ENTIT:LED "AN URUiNANCE. Ql+' TIM Cl'r1' UF ST'UhAYE VALLE•1', WASIQNGTnN ADQPTTNG A RUDGET FOlY THL PFRIpD 0T JATTUARl' 1, 2005 TNROUGH UECLMBE12 31, 2005 APPROI'RIATI1jG FUNUS AND ESTABL[SH1:NG SALARI' SCHTUULES FOIt LSI:4BLiSHrI) 1'OSI110nTS." WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of the annual budget, it has become necess3iy to make changes by adding ne.w revenue, appropriarions, amendmenis ancl transferring funcls in order to properly perform various City functions; services and activities; and WI•1TRLAS; the budget changes set forth in t.his Orclinance could not have been reasonably anCicipaced Ur lcnown when the annual budget was passed by the City Council; and V11HERLA5, the Ciry Council has determined that the be5t interesis of the City are served by amenciing the adopted budget as set forth herein. \OV1' THT±:REF'ORF, The Cih, Council af the Cit), of Spokane Valley, 1k'ashino on dq ordAin as follows: Section 1. Budget Amendment. The Budget far the twelvc mont:hs endins December 31; 2005; and each item, revenue, appropriation, znd fund are hereby amended as shown in Exhibit A and as follows. A. General Funct Unrestricl:ed Fund Balance is inereased by $4;434,250 representina carr?rover fund balance fi-om 2004. 2005 Building perinit fees are increased $600,000 and Sales Tax receipts are increased $800,000. S700,000 in existing Operating Transfer-L4an Repayment appropriation is re-appropriated for transfcr to the Service Level Stabilization ($200,000) Fund and transfer to a new Civic Building Fund ($500.000) which is hereby created. Appropriations are inereascd as shown in sectivn 2. B. Street Pund revenues are increased with iransfets from i11e Gener.il Fund in the amount of $2,000;000. Appropria[ions are inereased For street operations as shown in sectiUn 2. C. Street: Capital l'rojects Eund revenues are increased with a transfer from the General Fund in the amount of $800,000; developer eantribut:ions in the amount of $1;073,000 and grant revenues in the amnunt of $1,914,000. Appropriations are increased as shown in section 2. D. Capital Grants I"und revenues are increased by $1,183,000 from grants for speciiic strect prqjcctS. Appropriat:ions are increased by the same amount in section 2. E. Barker Bridge Fund revenues are increasecl $116,000 by grant income. Appropriations are increased in se.etion 2 by a likc amounc. F. Parks C3nital Irnprovemcnt rund is liereby created for the purpose of rriaking capital improvements to parks aiid to purehase and/or lease land for public parks. Revenues resulc from a transfer froni the General funcl in the amount of $550,000. Appropriations are authorized in the same atnount in section 2. ! G. Service. l.,evel Stabilization .Rcserve Fund is hereby created with a revenue transfer from the " General Fund in the amount of $1,000,000. Appropriations are authorized as shown in section 2 as neeclcd to maintain city service levels. Orditiacice 05-4i8 Amending 200513uc1get Psgc 1 of 3 DRAFT H. Wintcr Weather Reserve Fund is herehy ereatecl wit:h .i cransfer frOm lhe General Fund in the ~ amount nf $500,000. ApproqriatiQns are authorized as shown in section 2 for costs relating to slreets including, but not limited to sanding, snow plowing and deicing. 1. Centerplace Operating Reserve Fund is hereby created widi a transfer from dle Ueneral Fund in the amount of $300,000. Appropriations are authorized as shown in section 2 f'nr unexpected operating costs associated with Centerplace at Mirabeau Point. J. A Civic Builcfing Fund is hereb_y created for the purposes of purchasingfleasing land, builclings and eonsirueting capital improvements for civic purposes. Revenues for 2005 will co«le from a General Funcl transfer in lhe amount of $500,000. Appropriations are authorized as shown in section 2 f'or capital improvements relating to civic buildings. Section 2. 1=unds Apprapriated. To facilitare the above buciget amendments from the estimated revenues, including beginning unresmicted fund balances for cach separate funcl, thc appropriations and the aggregate totel for aII funcls combined for the neriod January ] through December 31 are set (-orth in summary form. The following chart shows the projected revenue; projected unrestt•icted fund balances, arnendments a.nd total revenue. Also shown below are the beginning appropriations, amenclments and total apprnpriations for the amendcd 2005 budget. R.FVENUh;S: 1+CTNll ( BEG. REV/F1Vn AAi, AATFNDIM_FNT FND REVENUES General $29,009,515 $ 5,834,250 $34,543,765 Sereet 3,803,158 2,000,000 5,803,158 Arterial St. 1,086,003 1,086,003 Hotel/Motel 437,$27 437.827 I'aths & Trails 17,900 17,900 ; L7ebt Serv. 2003 582,835 582,835 Stre:et F3and 2003 406,000 . 406,000 Ca ital Projects 2,105,904 2.105,904 Street Ca . 933,030 3,787,000 4,720,030 S ec. Ca , 1'roj. 1,912,457 1,912,457 CD Block Grant U 0 Ca itsl Grants 3,527,000 1.183.000 5,010,000 Barker Ttd. Rrid e 234,000 116.000 ~ 350,040 Risk vl t. 140,528 140,828 Stormwater 2,061,026 2,061,026 F ui . R fi R 272;892 272,592 Parks Ca . Projects 0 550,000 550,000 Mirabeau Pt. 3,000,000 3,000,000 Center Iace p. Res U. 300.000 300,000 Serv..Level Res. 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 Winter Wcather Res O 500,000 500,000 Civic 13uildin * Fund 0 500.000 500,000 Total $49,830,375 $15,770,250 $65,600,625 .i Qrd inance OS-QI $ Amending 2005 I3utlget Pagc 2 of 3 DRAFT EXI'C.iD]TURFS/APPfl_OI'Itl-A]'1Ot-"S: J FiJNT 2005 ORICrl1i Al; TUTAL Al'}'1tOY1ZLATtUN AMENDN'IE.NTS AYPROPRIATION 1. General $28,508,165 $51834;250 ~ S34,342,415 2 Strcct: 3,318,066 2,000,000 5,3 18,066 3. Arterial Sh•eet 856,400 556,400 4. 1-[oteUMotel 300,000 300000 5. Tacrt Serv. 2003 582,835 582,835' 6. 2003 Sr.reet Bond 406,000 406,000 7. Ca ital Yrojects 332,545 ~ 332,545 S. Special Capical Projects 205;145 205;145 9. Stre.ct Ca ilal Prajects 933:000 3,787,000 4,720_000 10. Risk y9gmt. 134:450 134_450 1 I. Stormwater Ni rmt 1,312,521 1,312_521 12. Equipment Rcntal & 51;051 51;051 I7e facement 13. vlirabeau - CeiiteePlacc 3,000,000 3,000:000 14. Ca ital Griuits 3.827.000 1,I83,000 5,010,000 15. Barker• Bridge 234,000 116,000 350,000 16. Parks Ca ital Pra'. 0 55-0,000 550,000 17. Center lace 4 Res 0 300,000 300,000 1£. Service Lev. Res 0 1,000,000 1.000.000 ~ 19. Vl'intei• Weather Res 0 500,000 500,000 20. Civic Building 0 500,000 SOO,qOQ TOTAL $44,001,178 ~ S15,770,250 $59,771,425 Section 3. Severability. If any section, sentenee, clause or phrase of t:his Ordinance should be held to be invalici or «nconstitutional by a cow-t of competcnt jurisdiction; such invalidity or unconstitutinnality shall not affeet the validity or constitutionalicy of any other section, se:nl:enc;e, clause or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 4. rffective Date.. This Ordinanee shall be in full force and cf'[ect fve (5) days after publication of lhis Ordinance nr a summary thereof in xhe official newspaper of the City as provided by law. Passed by ihe City Couneil of the Cic~y a1' Spokane Valley this clay of , 2005 ATTFST: ]7iana Wilhite, Mayqr Christine Bainbridge, Ciiy Clerk AI'PROVED AS TO PORtVI: Cary P. Driskell, Deputy City Attnrney Published date: Ffiective date: Ordinance 05-013 Amcnding 2005 Budgct Page 3 of 3 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY AP,flENDMENTS 70 2005 BUDGET ' MarCh 31, 2005 ~ Exhibit A 2005 BUDGET DESCRIPTION FUND AMENDMT Source of Funding GENERAL FUND: 001 Transpo Group - Ponderosa PUD revievr 2004 carryover $ 5,000 Unrestricted Fd Bal. Spokane Reg. WastEwater Alliance 2004 carryover $ 14,500 Unrestricted Fd Bal_ Niirabeau Park Bridge Improvements 2004 carryover $ 27,000 Unrestricted Fd Bai. Staffing: Authorized at retreat/council mtgs 001 $ 537,750 Unrestricted Fd Bal. Transfer to Street Fund for Operations 001 $ 2,000,000 Unrestricted Fd Bal. Transfier to Capital Projecks Fund 001 $ 1,150,000 Sales taxlBldg fees Transfer to Service Level Stabilization 001 $ 400,000 Saleslbldg/unrestrictd Transfer to Winter Weather Reserve 001 $ 500,000 Unrestricted Fd Bal. . Transfer to Civic Building Fund 001 $ 500,000 Unrestricted Fd Bal. STREET FUND: Level of service analysis intersections 101 S 50,000 General Fund Transfier STREET CAPITAL PROJECTS: . 16th Ave-proj 2, Dishman/Mica 2004 carryover 303 $ 151,000 General Fund Transfer Evergreen, 16th to 2nd 2004 carryover 303 $ 20,000 General Fund Transfer Carnahan 2004 carryover 303 $ 148,300 General Fund Transfer South Greenacres 2004 carryover 303 $ 23,000 General Fund Transfer PineslMansfield ($1,101,000 less $28,000) 303 $ 1,073,000 Developer contribution Barker Rd Reconstruction ($3.028 less $1.114 mil) 303 $ 1,914,000 Grant Valley Corridor environ grant 307 $ 200,000 Fed. Grant Appleway ($513,000 less $216,000) 307 $ 297,000 Fed. Grant Dishman/Mica (5176,000 less $41,000) 307 $ 135,000 Fed. Grant Argonne grant awarded for ihis 2003 project 307 $ 317,000 Fed. Grant Valley Corridor - Project 2 (if environ work done) 307 $ 234,000 Fed. Grant Barker Rd Bridge (S350,000 less $234,000) 308 $ 116,000 Fed. Grant PARKS CAPITAL PROJECTS: Improvements, land acquisition 309 $ 550,000 General Fund 7ransfer Civic Building Fund 310 $ 500,000 General Fund Transfer ~ ~ ~CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: April 26, 2404 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business Z new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Amending 2005 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Resolution 04-019 dated 6/22/04 adopting ine 2005- 2010 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP); Council approval on Novernber 16, 2004 for Mayor signature on the Project Certification Statements for each SRTC application for federal grant funds; Council approval on October 19, 2004 for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) applications. BACKGROUND: Council adopted the 2005-2010 TIP based upon information staff had at that time relative fo available funds and how these funds could be utilized for transporfation projects. Council also approved the following list of projscts for which we submitted funding applications ~ to SRTC: • PineslMansfield Congestion Relief Project • Appleway Boulevard Reconstruction - Tschirley to Hodges Road ~ Argonne Road - Indiana Avenue to Montgomery Avenue • Dishman-Mica Road - 1"t Avenue to Sprague Avenue • Broadway Avenue - Bates Road to Sullivan Road • Valley Corridor - Project 2, Appleway Extension - University Rd. to Evergreen Rd. • 8"Avenue Reconstruction - Havana StrEet to Park Road • Park Road - Sprague Avenue to Broadway Avenue • We1lesley Avenue - Sunnyvale Road fo Flora Road Grant funding was received for all but the last three projects. Staff also submitted two CDBG applications for pavement improvements to Montgomery Avenue from 1) west of Argonne road to University Road, and 2) from University Road to Pines Road (SR-27). The portion of Montgomery from University to Pines has been selected for funding. Based on this inforrnation, it is recommended that the 2005 TIP be amended to reflect the deletion of the projects that did not receive funding, include newly funded projects, and include those projects that were not completed in 2004 and have been carried over to the 2005 construction year. Projects tnat received grant funds must be included in the adopted TIP before we can proceed with design and construction effoRs. OPTIONS: 1) Adopt amended 2005 TIP; 2) Not adopt amended 2005 TIP; 3} provide additional direction to staff. ~ i RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Approval of Resolution 05-006 adopting amended 2005 Transportation Improvement Program BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The 2005 budget is being amended to include the additional costs associated with this amended 2005 TIP. STAFF CONTACT; Steve M. Worley, Senior Engineer; Neil Kersten, Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Resolution 05-006 with attached amended 2005 TIP ; ~ J DRAr-T Cl'1'1' QF SPOKA.NE. VALLEY ; SPOKANF COUN1'Y, V1'ASWTNGI'ON 12ESQLiJ'f']ON NO. 05-006 A RFSOLUTION QF TFE. C1TY QI+ SPOKAi\`E VALI..FY, SNOKANT, COIINTY, WASHIlVGTON, AIN'fE\'UINC TIiFF; 2005 I'1t11VSFORTATION TMPRONTLME1'T PRUG1tAM FOR TF[E CT"rY OF SPOKANE VALLEY. WHEIt1aAS, the Ciey Council for Spokane Valley did aclopc by Resolution No. 04-019 the 2005- 2010 Six-Year Transportation lmprovement 1'rogram (TIP) wit.h such protram acting as aguide for the coordinated develonrnent. of the City's transportation system; and WHLREt1S; changes in certain funding sow•ces have occurred; and NVHEIZE:AS, the atiached amended 2005 T.TP daes incorporate saicl changes for year 2005; and 1~'dHEt2EAS, pursuant to the State Environmental Pnlicy Act; the adoptinn of the Six-Year 7'11' is a nonproject action which has received proper and timely environmental review by the Cit.y; and VVHEREAS; the amendmcnts to the 2005 TfP are consistent with Spokdne Valley's adopted [nterim Comprehensive Flan; and VJI-LER[?t1S, this accion constitutes an amendment to the City's lnterim Capital Facilities Plan ~ tunder its i.ntcrim Comprehensive Plan, and has been sent to the Washington State Department of Community Trade and Economic Development for review pursuant to f7CW 36.70A.106. NOW TI-IEREFORL, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spolwne County, Washington; as follows: The City Council hercby aclopts the attached amended 2005 TI[' For the City of Spokane Valley f'or the purpose of guiding the design, development and construction of Incal and regional transportacion improvements for the year 2005. Thc Ci[y Clerk is directed to Fle the ainended 2005 TQ' with the Washington St1te Secretary of Transportation not more than thirty (30) days after adoption of this Resolution. The arnendcci 2005 TIE' shalL ac least, be annually revicwed for the purpose of detennining the «rork accomplislied under the program and the City transportsiion requirements. Projects ancl timefra«nes identified in the 1'IP are to be considered estirnates only that may thange due to a vttriety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by propeMy awners or developers in rnakinD clevelopment decisions. Adopted tliis 26" day of April, 2005. Cit?+ of Spokane VaIley A°I"Ti:ST: [7iana Wilhite, Mayor Christine, Baiiibridge; City Clerk I-I:Ic1xiinbriclgelRcsolutionslResotution ,imcnding 2005 TTF' draft4-26-45 with lcgul chgs.[JOC City of Spokane Vailey Department of Public Works Adopted 2005 Transportation Improvement Program 2005 Primary Project From To Source City Amount Total Project Spokane River 1 Bar9cer Road Boone Br. AIP $ 215,000 $1,114,000 2 PineslMansfield Wilbur Pines Road TPP S 28,000 $1,777,004 Pines & Indiana Vdest Bouncf Ramps 3 Barker Road Bridge at Spokane River #5503 BR $ - $ 234,000 4 Applervay Raad Tshirley Road Hodges Raad STP(U) $ 30,000 216,000 5' Sth Avenue Havana Park Road STP(U) $ 153,000 $ 1,136,000 Forker 8 6 Sullivan Road North Ext. Progress Wellesley Ave. TPP s 5,000 S 327,000 7 Broadway Ave. Rehab. Bates Rd. Sullivan Rd. STP(U) S 110,000 S 812,000 8' Wellesley Ave. Rehab. Sunnyvale Rd. Flora Rd. STP(U) S 47,000 $ 344,000 9* Park Road Rehab. Sprague Ave. Broadway Ave. STP(U) $ 22,000 $ 164,000 10 Dishman Mica Road Rehab. 1st Ave. Sprague Ave. STP(U) $ 7,000 $ 41,000 $ 617,000 $ 6,165,000 ' Projects deleted from 2005 program due to ladc of grant funding City of Spokane Valley O Departrnent of Public Works DRAFT Amended 2005 Transportation Improvement Program 2005 Primary Projec# From To Sflurce City Amount Total Project 1 PineslMansfield Wilbur Pines Road TPP $ 27,400 $ 1,101,OOfl Pines & Indiana West Bound Ramps 2 valley Corridor Environmental Study University Rd. Evergreen Rd. STP(U) $ 19,000 $ 200,000 3 Barker Road Bridge at Spokane River Br. ti5503 BR $ - $ 350,000 4 Barker Road Boone Spokane River AIP $ 558,000 $3,028,000 Br. 5 Appleway Boulsvard Tshirley Road Hodges Road STP(U) $ 70,000 $ 513,000 6 Broad+vay Ave. RehGb. Bates Rd. Sullivan Rd_ STP(U) $ 110,000 $ 813,000 7 Dishman Mica ftaad Rehab. 1 st Ave. Sprague Ave. STP(U) S 40,000 $ 176,000 8 Argonne Road hehab. I-90 PJiontgomery STP(U) $ 43,000 $ 317,000 9 Montgomery Ave. Rehab. University Ave. Pines (SR 27) CDBG $ $ 440,000 10 Park Road - Project 2 8th Avenue 2nd Avenue AIP $ 63,000 $ 304,000 11 16th Avenue - Project 2 Dishman P,liica Rd SR 27 STP(U) $ 21,000 $ 151,000 12 Evergreen Road 16kh Avenue 2nd Avenue AIP $ 4,000 $ 20,000 13 Vallp-y Corridor - Projec# 2 Univzrsity Evergreen STP(U) S 96,400 $ 234,040 $ 1,051,400 $ 7,643,000 ojccts and timefrmes identified in thc TfF arc to be considered estimates only that may Ct1Fl0gC (IUC l0 a V31'ICty of circumstcunces, and are not ` rtendcd by thc City to bc rclicd upon by property owners or develcipers in making developmGnt dcxisions. Fundsd Projec#s Added Projects 2004 Carry Over Project Spokaue County Fair & Expu Center Missiou Statement CI~T Ol S okane V~alle The Spokane County Fair and Expo Centar `,1 p y shaJl strive to exempliiy the standards ~OU.IlC11 MEEt1 necessary to re@eci the needs of Spokane ng County now and into Ihe 215' century by prpv6ding a professionally managed hacility thal ensures opportunity for community, public, and tlpril 26, 2005 private events, as vrell as pro0uce the Spokane tnterslate Fair Utiat maintains our agr'vcullural \A heritage. ~ ~ Spokane County Fair Spokaize County Fair & Expo & Expo Center Center...We've Got It All! • 07 Acros • 18 Bulld[n9s Avaltable ~ • cReo coRvkx - aaP +.z.3.4 (raea a e;.azo sa n.) a , anroee+ar ou,ffrg ` • AV Cmp{cx • Ap Byil7ings A,B,C.D Ratal d 51.108 :p. R.) Mufli Camez -lkilli A,B.C 142.500 sq- fl-) • l AntW a ~ (irBrQSL711tl MBhi ~ I v J~'.~ • If10w AfBIW ~rq_~.ya_~~.~ • NoryO AtGLI • - ~ - • ~ ' • CovKxxiCd Arern Spolcane Counry Fair & Expo Center...We've Got It All! Events We host e wide variety o( events/shows: • 189 Harse stalls • Tradeshaw/s ~ • 278,000 sq.tt. of lawn areas • hiome and Yard Shows • Ample Parking • Auio and Boat Shows • RV Carrvsites • Ski 5hows - • Horse and LivesOOtk Shows J~~4 • Car Stwws ~ ~ 1 . \ Events _ Upcoming Events • Fundrafsers ' ' •$anqueLSlprivate dinners • Spokone Noma Bufeders Prember F4ome Show • RV Shovrs • Jr. Livestodc • Seminore 3nd Tra3ning • Rido tYw Wes! • Contpany Picnics • Pet Fest • Spokano Komel Club and so much more throughout the yearf • Spokone Gun Show • Ear1y Ford Y8 ~ Upcoming Events • American Dairy Goai A:,sOCialipn • $800,090 econotnic ImpaG on ragion • Genera9ing 1.000 room nots •Good G,,ys Spokane County Interstate Fair! , • Cusier's Fall Mtique Sale • ceremics snw September 9-18, 2005 • Home Ideas Show • Ski Swap • ChristMs Arts ared Crefts 2004 Shows Increase Eapansion of the Spokane in Buslriess Counry Fair and Expo Center • Remed out epprwdmalely 20,000,000 sq. feet ol build'eng SpBCC. -;r.^:w~ii« s;} • e•«~3:°:'~~ , • Intrea9e of rtearty 2,000,000 sq. R campaied fc 2003. • 280.000* visitnrs tn the Fa'v and Eupo Center tacifrty throughout the year. • lrtcrease o/3A,0iPD+ v!sl:ors compared to 2003. 2 Expansion of our Faciliry Expansion of • $12 million is boing 6tivu51od in the lacility upgrades and SCF & EC Facility expaflsion. • Sinco 2003 we navo added a new Grandstand • Cor►sVUCtion is ahead ol schedulel Arena and the naw tood row area. • gey a end crortnectpr wi0 be ready tor use during the tair • Curtenlty under construCtioor, in Septemberl • 8ay a in place ot the Floral Bu(Iding, • AHer the Fair, the lobby of Bay 1 will be uppraded lo iruGudo 3 eoMaronca rooms, a kitr.hen and Wher new • Cortnectnr BuHding between Bays 1 8 2. pmpni6es. • This area will oHor a new grand en?rance intn the . qddifion of new buildings great se0ing point tor our praunds and Iho Bay buQdfngs. 4L facilityt Marketing Efforts _ Exciting Grno 0o market avr facdltyl . • Networking {n the convnuniay. {,r~..~ • Qavewwnp an Econarmc tmpaa Study to be conaucced wlth in tho noxt year. We lonk foiward to seeiug you at the • Researching and 7argetireA IocaUregionaUnational Spokane Counry Fair & Expo Centerl eventsfassociatioais 1n host ovonts lutro. • Evaluatinplupdalung markeUnO irotarktla snQ web sNe. partnore,hip with ft Cve. Tha11k YOU! ~ L.~ 3 ~ SPokane Area Economic Development Council Quarterly Undate Qi-2oo5 !'acilitufing blLsfiress solrrtions, cenitnrnrc cxprensiou und,llubnlly cnmriefitivc ccnm11eonitics lo impitiwuc thc .51riiknnc rcyitut ¢i:unumy fpe.ao- ~ no6 2005 Friorities • Organi7e cfficiiDndv to opAimizc rnttpuCCOSt rauo ~ • Daliver updnted nuvketing S salcs tools • Drive regiunal tzchnology cluster dcvrlopmeot aiid tech job growUi • Increase invcsimcnt in eetrerating nwareness of Spol:ane Rcgion • ConLinuc investatent in manufacturing cluster devclopmentaad recruitmcnt • Providc suppart fbr Ingistics &I, UFatthcare clustcrs ~ ~ ~ .,,r_. CEO p*~-- VP N' Fu~ncn~ Va It4~q p M ~ Muslt~ Nj~, TaMa 'a~ IM2.ry M~ T InOWry M7• CD Paims nm wit,.lM. Ha%t.r~m flmmrtli 1. ~ , 2005 Project Activity • • Summ.itPropcety- ~ fw7ilmic~rcacnmueiiydeudn.~l`~agai~Frwia~i"nactircyl.u:litiltx kspoondud fardeceloper . • Wcsl Pluinti Ihvelnprnent - K'uAin6 ai[h Airpuh fi Cuuat~ Co iaZCasc Jc~elupmeat op{:,rt~nitkx, (icigcr 5Par im+n vcmcm • Spokare Vsllcy 1.[,gistie,drnPg, focus ~ Inarn4ng &~azti on leduur6l luuJ sLtca, d~x rccreiiimat In inlley {rohaari¢1 pnk • Libcny LaYe Tcch Foats ~ Geue iechnnlu5Y patrenGips Incdly, dei tt tcnd aenr.r.Ak-n LSfouglf loral 6ulness, lnncese ntdii aiatt iun nq tcCh • Ctus[zrdetirloprncnt - Creuiun of ncu• ci~~nn groap~ for tceha5lu~}' unA oemsprcefavim{on ~ 2005 Cluster Acciviry • Technolosy - 1')Igital - AuiEwtc autrcu:h aL. LL[7'ULSF/il' LiGlinc, building cu- op matctiaS PruJrct3 - Pi.>mcslBiMCCL- putncairb nlINHS to r-...uBniu hcalthcue sroqx'siam Eor t+usiocea doralupcfKU , - F,nergy-wuikinguvthN'$Uuode+sluringiechlrmAerbuvness muAcl, cwluiit; mcruiimcN oppwriurspy md (cJccs7 fir_ding Ufl.ix4 • Maniefac[wing - Ad~nn4d,V~~g,-Air.~:l(cr.niAmcnl,C1;'LOt~c~opmcnl - AerutpaslAvimiqa - h;AbS RFI. <aciAiqj ir:uslu.Vu a ~pmur G mn►eting ruerinls w/Af+pan, numeciit~n, «a Nir.ing 787 uxpply ipn - Tfailda+a! - dlrect acru4ieen6 U.'EA psna»his • LOgISlll3 - D'nslnbutiao I IuSs - incre,unttq mmteting o( n•iFleble sites ~ epa~w b.. eo6 Ql Mai•keting Activity^~~-•~~_~ • Weh Sile Develnpmenl _ • ` . , . ~'i . na:ugnir.xcl siaiaof-tlie on ![Ctl1UDIOpY • Cluster Specific Sales Tools - 'nnc pagcn' for [`ch, hca hncarc - Abaut Spui'Yanc summary, ncw rosps • Media Hits - 42 mcdin hits, 4 press rclcases • Direct Mail Activicy - kccmitrnr_nt - 195 can[nccs - Si1e Selectaus- 1,l9S eauncKs 2 ~I ff 1 Q1 Business Development Activity • Il:adh in clevelapment - i: nca Icub . S] wml leni; in Acmb,qnncnl - D Ictd, tknc,d.3 ~i[mem I~. • Propasals devekfpKtl - 16 new pnPwla (inAdwlinp EADS) • $IIC vjti{15 - 7 oulMwcd cliem vizitti y inhuund rlicm Nisils • I,uCal bUSinem, ourrcxh - 73 malinr} u•kh IneA Duoiaeu • Clustor rnettings - 3 icthnningyclnan o+cr,iinF, • Cli7. - 3 twu• Fcnjeas = $7\9 rvlrinl ime%t.mr2156(']R in mz savings ~ aww~ r..~mc Collaborative Activity • Developed EDA Crnnt :pplicatiun for updaced CFDS ~ • NxXW econornic impaci aiid retention program • Cannrct NW D'egit,sl Infrxsuucwre even! • GnmeFest tu~m neernMerlFuuyix~t develnpment • Hc:w7th Kcimhurssment Asxuunt pmjcct with HIP • Just C:Itutcrs wot$;shop • Froject Msnagrmeiit for Fastrm Wtsshingtnn Regional GiITaAop iedutiuil • Pmjcct M:usageenant far SpokaneHot7one • Projcct Mnnagemuu fur Brovnficlds Prngnm • Gciger Spur gr-at itaci:igement 3 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 04-26-05 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business public hearing ❑ information x admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Mobile Data Computers and Jail Staffing GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: A BRIEF DISCUSSION ABOIIT TECHNOLOGICAL NIEETaS FOR. PATR.OL FUNCI"IONS RITTT-1ITT THF SPQKANIF VALT F_Y POTdTCF TaFPARTMENT: One of the key tools utilized by our Patrol asld hlvestigative Division is our N7obile Data Computers (MDC). Aitached is preliminary inforrnation regarding the equipment we are currently using. Also at[ached are some preliminarp Paints of interest. C}iief Walkcr will lead a discussion of a proposal that has been brought forward regarding ne~v MDCs and the associated cosl. OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: ~ ATTACHMENTS: Enclosed material includes a copy of a previous presentation given by Sheriff Sterk to the Board of County Commissioners at their April 19, 2005 rneeting. \1 ~ Current M:DC's are 7 ycars old: ~ • Worn out / Used 24-7 for 7 vcxrs • I3reakin; dowu in largc numhers - 90 day tuni around to repair - No Heaters in thc MDC's • Old Teclinology • - WiII not allow us io Phase in the Automated F'ield Reportiiig (AF.R) Systcm wluch we purchased fol• $173,000 - This funding was always uiclucied 'ui our 1/10 of 1% on-going Infrastructure I'lan • New Generation of MI)C's make us mnre efficicnt - AFR - Video Streanung CapabiJities (.Fost Falls) - lnt'ormation (11(F) Module/AFR/1A11'EL/1'aperless [nfractions - Tlltunb Print Capabilities - Conscrves Staff in IZecordslCotu-ts/Shcriff's Office • Iuimediate Supcrvisory Rcview of Rcpnrts and Infractions , i - Puts GPS Screen/Mappina in Lieucenant a.nd Sergeazlts cars - 1'uts Spokaiie Photo Retrieval Systeul(SPRS) into cars - 1'uts hitel T'lyers into cars - Six Minutc Roll Call 1 raitung - COP Linl:/I.,ink Analysis Capability in the Field - I-iooks us up to Wi/Ni and Vivado - Itroniti IMDC's move us ourt proprietaiy to upgeadeable system - Printing Capabilit:ies in every car • Search WE1TTaI1tS • Affidavits - Operators License R.eader a Populatcs Ficlds on Infra.structure Reports - Interchangcable 13ctu~een Cars (currently when an MDC goes down; die whole vehicle is out of service) ~ . ; , ~ MDC FINANCIAL IMPACT 879,976 Cost for MDC Project -347,899 Communication Center Carryover funds -65.250 Supplemental funds granted in 2005 Budget 466,827 Total Amount needed fior Project 466,827 Tota1 needed for Project -198,168 Spokane Valley Percentage* 268,659 Unincorporated Percentage Board of County Commissioners has allowed an option for the City of Spokane Valley to pay over a four-year period starting in Budget Year 2006 if the City chooses to do so. *Valley Percentage: 42.45% of $466,827 =$198,168 / 4 years =$49,542 per year ~ ~ J MDCProposal l ~ . Spokane County Sheriff Jail Division zoos - zoo7 Jail Staffing Proposal ~ . , Objective ~,4 - e S ; ~ OIncrease services to the Criminal Justice ' Syste m ~ ' OReduce Liability OReduce Overtime OIncrease safety and security for the community, staff and the inmates. 1 ~ i Current Staffing E 1 0146 Corrections Officers : , ! O11 Corrections Sergeants : 02 Corrections Lieutenants 09 Registered Nurses (RN) ~ 00 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) (Adequately Staffed Positions Not Includeci) ~ Needs Assessment ~ , ; OBased on current operational demands: . 25 Corrections Officers I . 1 Corrections Sergeants . 1 Corrections Lieutenants . 1 Registered Nurses (RN) . 3 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) , 2 I ~J Positions OLieutenant . Large span of control / Increased responsibility . No increase since the Jail was opened in 1986 . Has not kept pace with the demand of the position , .5~ Positions OSergeant ~ . Responsibilities: ; i • Custody staff • Support staff • More than 600 inmates • Emergency/Crisis management • 24 Hours a day/7 Days a week • Run the ]ail in the absence of Command Stdff 3 I ~ . F +1~~ ~ y Lieutenant ~ r Sno►sneCbuntxShtriRnen21Yment.leil(:)ieanizatignCh2n 2002 1 ~ lail Cammaader ~ I Correcooa Lt • 1 Concetian Li - 2 j i , ~ 1° Plz:non 2nd Plaronm 3'l Floor Bnsernrnt 4'~ Floar 9 Corrertium Scrgeants I` Floor ~ 5° Floor 94 Comctiun Office13 2°4 Floar ~ 6" rioor Aunez I ti ctia iis I AILIIIItIStfAilve (Jnil 1 Mulinl thit 1 Office Supervisur ' I Muree Supervisor 2 Acrnuodag'PcCb N t e kN's 2 5etrcl:uy 11 ` I Scrnfary 11 1 Secrctary I 13 Ckcical Assisinnk Clessifitatscm Uuit gMilly 1 nits a CmractioT OCfucers Ujit18tL009 SPppOri IJlait I COIreChOn $eigtiA 1 c , GTitY[IOII Of~tCCfS LivescnnJSPRS 1 5ccrctary I 5 C;orrectioo Oiricm 7~taintrnance Libruy! law Libmry 4 Concetnoa Ofricers 2 Cm*ctelau Offrcars I-ood Serveces 1 Foad Dtanagor R Jail C'ooks 7ruisport I Culrectiaa Serncant IG CTrteaiat dffic;rrs JAtS 1 Booking Unit 18 C"mrcction Otricus Populatiou Conirol Oflicer 1 Cunrction Officer I/ l i Lieutenant oSpokane CountY Sheriff Office Jail Division Orqanization Chart ,ro~•- ~ 'l ; - - 2005 Sheriff i Undersheriff ~ i Currentiy i .Jail Commander ~ filled by Jail 15' Platoon 2"d Platoon 3rd Platoon Commander ` Custody Technolagy Support I Corrections Lt Coaections Lt Corrections Lt • In4cma! Investigutions • Intetnal Investigntions • Intomal Investigatioru ~ • Budgeling • Budgeting • Budgeling I • Repotts Custody Project A4anger Administrat~on • oCo;mcSm ^u~. • JaaF~c;:ansron • ~ Su(~rsn9a. • 93 Co~roa~Ons Offa7s • CCR Pmi~t • 2 Accointlnp 1'Pch IV • 2 SEe.YO'!&1)' II • 90 Shcritf 7tli Ass%lsnb Classifrcation 1 West ! Booking • aCmMVWnsomcers • teCOnexiauocticefs PABdiCa) • J)JS! RtdS • i ttLnsa SupeMsir • SPfIS • 9 RN'9 • t Scactary II • t 0octnr Population Gontrol Lfbrary Services DenW • t Coimctfam Oliiccr • 2 CortnClorc. O.`ticais Food Service Od ACanaqer FC CovY.a Transport Livescan E-el • 7 CarecBms Spt • 5 Carectlais Qtneos • 14GorsetEomOR'pp3 OSU • i Camcuons sgi • 2 Ccxroctlmc Cfiocis Alaintenanoe • 1 5hW11i THCb Assfwant • 4 cui,ecaa.ts Mims ' • (.atmrky r , Positions . , ~ i OCorrections Officers , ~ • 6 Transport personnel . 4 Vacation Relief personnel ' • 6 Booking personnel • 6 Module personnel . 2 Classification personnel . 1 CIU personnel , Corrections Officers ' OTransportation - 6 new staff ! ; . 30,740 transports in 2004. ~ • 26,235 in 2002. ` . 16.30% increased workload from 2002 to 2004 . Negative Impact on overtime and the Overlap Duty Pool. 4 , Corrections Officers ~ OVacation Relief - 4 new staff ; • Currently only 5.5% of the Corrections ' Officers can take vacation on any given day. caasea on a off of 146 cotai carecUons orr«m> • Under the proposed increase of 4 new Corrections Officers that number would rise to 8. Z% (SaseG on 12 off oP 171 total CorreNors OYices) m Can not meet existing contractual Union obligations 0 Corrections Officers i ~ _ ; OBooking - 6 new staff ~ . Work Load- 3 Shifts / 24 hours a day • Medical Transports ~ ! • Warrant service • DNA collection . Emergency Response . Hazardous Working Conditions • MRSA and Clandestine Laboratory Chemicals C/ 5 _ .J Corrections Officers f ~ OClassification - 2 new staff . Current Classification Officer to inmate ratio is 1 to 150 . Objective ]ail Classification Standards (OJC) is 1 Classification Officer for every 80 -100 Inmates . Under the proposed increase of 2 new Classification Officers the ratio would be 1 Classification Officer for every 100 Inmates . , Corrections Officers . t: : ; OClassification (cont.) ~ ~ . Mental Health Inmate Management ' . Intelligence gathering ; ' . Key to reducing liability . Enables Electronic Home Monitoring (EHM) . 6 Corrections Officers , OCriminal Investigation Unit (CIU) 1 new position . Work to gather intelligence on all type of organized crime . Work on homeland security issues • Antiterrorism ~ ; Corrections Officers ~ ~ - - OModules - 6 new staff ~ • 5 East and 3 East are double bunked. That ; requires that a second officer work on those modules anytime the inmates are out of their cells. Currently those positions are not funded. . 4 East Mental Health Module - Intensive management inmates. • Reduced community support/funding 7 . ' i Corrections Officers OModules (cont) ~ . 6 East (Super Max) ; • Extremely dangerous floor ! • 2 and 3 man escorts • High Profile/High Security • Serious mental health issues • Increased workload ; Positions . ~ ~ j ~ ~ . I ~ 01 Registered Nurse (RN) ~ i . Reactive - Not meeting level of care ; . Retention / Recruiting ' . Staff fatigue 03 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) . Relieve workload for RN's . Medication Pass 8 ~ Overtime 1L 02005 estimated OT cost in excess of $750,000 O Factors Driving OT . Increased Transport services . Vacancies • Military • FMLA • Resignations / Retirement / Terminations . Increase in County wide Inmate ADP ~ Spokane County Inmate ADP - - - - 1200 , 1oB 977 ' 1000 89 - 800 774 ` 6Q3. 618 .64 605 8 6 600 5 ~ 400 ~ . , >k,: r. 2~0 iT 460 ; 496, _515 541 r~ 5 ~~17,8 ~274 4oa ~ Gelgpc- ~ - f O .r_; ...c _ ::~f . , , . _ _~r 1995 1496M 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 olail ADP 577 596 622 562 534 603 616 641 605 648 Q Gei er A D P 153 178 274 404 443 480 496 515 541 545 . 9 \ i , . . . Overtime f ~ OSavings Will Not Be Seen Until 2006 ~ OIt Takes 6 Months to Train a New ' Officer . 2 Months In-House academy • 3 Months FTO program . 1 Month State Academy ; The Bottom Li ne ~ t I 1 I I , Estimated BudBet Impacf _ . ,}F,ireO~le i E Tdtle --------+--FiE ^ ~2005 ' 20Q5 2(197 i Ma 'OS IJ~AIPN ~ 3.00 i : 98.450 1 145.148 ~ 149,444 _Mqy'05? L'e9titenanl ~ 1A0,,11,.; 53.001 ~ ,82.495 85.926 ' 1 c -i ~_=~QV'05~ kserpeont _ t,~o 50,720 78,914 ( B~.,S.Q? ~ _ Jun'05; ~Additi~nol Ovorifine I_._ need ciobcTr omourit frarn Jol Omce 1 Jul'OSr Garections OFficer ~ 13AU i_ , 354.132 ~ 667,030 693,394 ~ Jul'OSY ;JaiIRN 1.00 ~ 31.531 t 63,144' 65.741 CorreClions Offcer : 12A0 , 640,740 ' 627.888 ' ~ 31 ~ 597,6$4 i 1,677.431 1,703,990 ~ .i 10 ~ Benefit to the County OReduction in Crime OReduction in Liability OReduction of Overtime ~ 2004 Billable Detention Hours : by Agency , 05,691,247 Total Detention Hours in 2004 ' . 60.67% County ~ . 12.38% City ; . 16.62% Federal _ . 1.83% Other Billable Agencies • Cheney, Deer ParSc, Medical Lake, Airway Heights, Liberty Lake, and Spokane Valley 11 ` . J Jail Expansion ~ : +Geiger Lease expires in 2008 ~ , ! +Study for Design (Med - Max Inmates) ~ ! ONIC Study / Grant money OSite Selection +Total County ADP is projected to rise 65 inmates per year over the next 10 years ~ ' Jail Expansion ~ ~ t. . ~ Chart 2: Spokane CouatyJa[1 F,QM and Pta{dng Popalat6ins ; tita[n Dovutowa and (;clger Cortectious Centcr ( qctual aud ForocasC 1996 to 2015: Poroeut Sfarts Aususl SOOJ 1. 600 1,500 r i .oa I '.soo ~ t.zoo ~ ~ 1.100 , pJa~l i~w.iking Poputatbn 1.000 p,q~t.g For. EOM .kL Pqp. 9D0 609 706eoo ' soo 400• 300 200. 100 e E$L' 8b6 ~ a o$S~~A9~ py~~:~~Rq 12 Jail Expansion ~ Churt 3: Spuksne Cuunry Jeil Yopututium: Mnin Jail dGci=crCC ByJafl Ststus M1chout Pcsking Facror) mSenUAetl /ctunl amf Norecasl: 1996 to 20 15 OSeiitFdon tAOO _ OPreSrn;bEsd 1,00 ■P~aSsitiFelm Akk 1100 Ost.1tr.lbkl^. ~ 1.100 ❑ L9G41I l4qldi t Fm n FOMfd HOYJ•a aao 900 7 aao a.,~✓ t,vv.i,Nvv'/v.N,rf✓v~~'- sooo ,,,~i✓'/'"V"✓V~^'1r('"N"`JV.n^WJ° 4o "0 3oo ~ 2m Iao . Valiey Precinct .1: - - ~ . I + 2007 Projected Opening ; . 24 Hours / 7 days a week operation t . 12 hour shifts O Manpower I . 4 Corporals . 6 Correction Officers O Estimated Salary Cost . $650,000 O Estimated Capital Cost . $100,000 13 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY f~ . Request for City Council Action Meeting Date: April 26, 2005 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ~ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ~ admin. report [ pending legislabon AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Administrative Report: Sign Regulations Discussion GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Spokane Valley Municipal Code Article V Signage Standards Section 10.30.660 amending the interim Zoning Code Chapter 14.804. PREVIOUS COUNCILJCOMMISSION ACTION : City Council was briefed on the progress of the Ad Hoc Sign Committee on July 20, 2004. Mr. David Crosby, Chair of the Committee, reported on the findings of the Committee on October 12, 2004. On December 9, 2004, the Planning Commission met with the Ad Hoc Sign Committee in a study session to review the Committee's recommendations. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on proposed amendments on January 13, 2005, and recommended approval by a vote of 4 to 2 with the Chairman not voting. City Council was briefed on the proposed amendments on January 25, 2005. The propossd ordinance was advanced to a second reading on March 8, 2005. City Council reviewed the proposed regulations in Study Session on April 5, 2005. BACKGROUND: Chapter 14.804 of the Interim Zoning Regulations regulates tne placement and dimensions of signage. The Ad Hoc Committee was chargsd with the "review and update" oi the existing regulations. The Committee met on a regular basis from mid-June through the first week of December, 2004. The meetings were held in the Council Chambers and were open to the public. Committee deliberations were also posted on the City's web site. Signs are classified as On-premises (advertising goods or services on site) and Off-premises. Billboards are off-premises signs. On-premises signs are either temporary (e.g. real estate sale) or permanent, and may or may not require a permit. Permanent sign types include attached or "wall" signs and free-standing signs. Free-standing signs include both "pole° signs and monument signs. Permanent signs require a permit. Local government may regulate the time, place, and manner of commercial "speech," but may not control the message. The Committee has recommended amending provisions which are not inconsistent with the Interim Comprehensive Plan immediately, including: • Updated definitions • Updated height, maximum copy area and spacing standards • Measurement of irregular signs The Committee also recommended amendrnents which should be considered following the adoption of the new Comprehensive Plan, including: • Amending "aesthetic corridor" designations within Spokane Valley • "Cap and Replace" for billboards The draft ordinance was forwarded to CTED for their review on November 2, 2004. A Determination of Non-Significance was also issued on November 2, 2004. The camment period expired on December 2, 2004. CTED has not commented on the draft ordinance. Administrative Report Sign Regulations Page 2 of 2 On April 5, 2005, City Council requested additional information and discussion relating to the i following issues: • Advertising copy on private benches within the public right-of-way. • Maintenance of directional signs installed by Spokane County. Spraque Avenue Directional Signs: Directional signs were installed on Appleway by Spokane County for a one-time charge of $175.00. Business address on Sprague required. Logo "overlays" were supplied by the business. Each sign identified up to six businesses on the sign. County records identify 101 businesses. The cflpy area for the business is 11'/' x 23" with the overall sign dimension of 48°w x 54" h for each sign. Ross Kelley, Spokane County Engineer advises sign maintenance is covered under the existing Public Works agreement. Bench Advertisinq: Sunset Outdoor Advertising, LLC currently maintains 75 bus benches in Spokane Valley, 17 in the unincorporated area and 229 in the City of Spokane. Under the proposed sign ordinance, if approved by the Council the benches would be "officialp signs. The City has two options: • Issue a request for proposal; or • Establish standard requirements for the benches The City and County of Spokane elected the former. Their requirements indude not more than 2 benches per STA-approved transit stop, benches to be located within ten feet of the stop, conforming to the Americans with Disabilities Act requirements, and subject to City approval. " The signs are to be kept in good repair and the advertiser is required to kesp worker's compensation, general and automobile liability insurance. The City of Spokane's current contract is for one year, with six month extensions. Compensation is $40.00 per bench per year, payable in advance in quarterly installments. Any other business wishing to locate benches are allowed to do so with the same conditions. The City may also request benches to be located at certain stops. Political Signs Council also raised questions about political signs. The attached memo from Deputy City Attorney Cary Driskell provides additional information on the topic. OPTIONS: Request additional information and/or provide additional direction to staff and the Planning Commission on issues raised. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Provide direction to staff on provisions relating to political signs, bus bench advertising and Appleway directional signs.. BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS: None. STAFF CONTACT; Marina Sukup, AICP, Community Development Director ATTACHMENTS: Background Memo from Deputy City Attorney Cary Driskell S CITY o~ane ~ ,;,OValley 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Vatley VJA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org Memorandum To: City Counci.l Ft•om: Czry P. Drisl:ell, Deputy Ciry Attorney CC: .Dave ivl.crcicr, City Ivla.nagcr; \iina Regor, Deput}° City Manager; M ar.i_na Sukup, Comnluiuty :Development llii•ector• Date: April 18, 2005 Re: Treatment of political si(.:,ns Caunc.i] Member Taylor asl:ed what rypes of rep-ulaiions the City could put in place regarding placemealt of politic.al signs. The follo«ring provides a short synopsis on tlus topic. ~ Governmenial entitics must bc vcry careful in the way political signs are regulated. The Uiuted States Supreme Court has issued various cieei5ions putlining what goveilunents can and cannot do in this arena. Addi[ionally; our state Supreme Court lias handed dowti decisions that expaiid on wliai the Ututed States Supreme Court determined. In short, our state Courl grants ereatEr pratection on political siens than does the federal Court, requiring the showine of a"compclling siate inierest" in the necessity for the rescrictions on political speech. Tliis is a very high barrier, in wh.ic.h the City would neecl to demonstrate that t,here is a ver}, stron€ rcason for having the limitation, such as a serious tlueat to public szfety. The City of: SeaTac adopted regulalioi~ on political speech in 2002. I think it takes a rational approach co political signs, allqwing ample c~pportunit~~ for speech, yet placing minpr time plac.e and manner restrictions. We may want. to tluitk about adoptuig sitnilar provisions. They are as fUllbws: All signs whicli are displayed out-of-doors or► rcal property relatillg 1:0 tlie noiiiination or election of any iiidividual for a public palitical office, or advocating any meastire to be voted Qn in any general or special election, shall be subject to the following regulatioiis: A. Such political signs shall noi be displayed more than seven (7) days after the dale of the election for w)Z.ich intended. In cases where a general electic>n follwvs ~ a primary election, thosc signs for candidates whase nanles will appear on the ballot in the general election may bc displayed during the inlerim period and up to seven (7) cia_ys aftcr the general election. In all instances hcrcin in which political signs are reyuired to bc removeci within seven (7) days after the electiUn for which the political sign was displaycd, it shall be the responsibiliCy of the campaign officer or responsible campaign official to have the signs rernoved. B. F'olitical signs plaeed in single-fanuly residential zones shall not eaceed eight (8) square feet each in arEa. Signs in all other zones sliall meet the requirements of tlhose classification districts. C. Nlo political signs shall be erecteci upon any privaie property without the permissi4n of the resident or owner thereof, and in cases where there is no occupicd structure on the property, no political sign shall be placed thereon without the wrilten c4nsent of thc oNvner of the property. D. It is unlmv-'ul for any persoil to paste, paint, affi.i or fasten a political sign on any utility pole, slreet sign, lamp post, sidcwallc, roadway, or other object situated upon any public street Or right-of=wa_y except that political signs are allnwed on parl:uig strips where such political sio s are installed pursuant to the permission of the oNviler of the property abulting said parking strip and insCalled 'ui such a manner as not to constitute a traffic hazard. If the Council is ioterested in adopting political sign regulaiions, these are some of ttie uiost recent adoptcd in Waslungton, thus tal:e into account more of the recent appellate decisions. / Please let tne know if you want more inforniatiqn on this matter. Cary P. Driskell Deputy Cit}, .4ttbrney \ J CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: April 26, 2004 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: f_1 consent ❑ old business ❑ ne+v business ❑ public hearing ❑ informaiion X admin. report Ej pending legistaiion AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Pavemeiit Cut Policy GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/H PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: At the April 5, 2005 study session, staff presenied iniormation on various pavement related issues, including the draft pavement cut policy. BACKGROUND: Public VVorks - Initial Poli;.y Review: Spokane Coun?y and the City of Spokane began development of a regional pavemznf cut policy in Tall of 2003. The City ol' Spokane Valley was initially involved in the process; howev?r, due to staffing constraints, the City decided to review the poliLy once drafted. Spokane County and City of Spokann are currently in the process of adopting the proposed pfllicy. Tne streets in the Ciiy of Spokane Valley are in significantly bettar condition than in the City of ~ Spokane, due to sevaral faLtflrs which include the existing utility cui standards we adopted as par' ol' the County Road Standards. The City of Spokane has not had written utili'ty cut standards. Public 1rJorks has briefly reviewed the pqlivy and has the following concerns: • The policy is vague in many areas and will likely lead to differing interpretations among thE local agencies and uiility companies. 1Ne would like to see clarificafions #o ciefined responsibilities of several provisions and to the new tiered approach for determining repair dimensions. • Tlie policy is moderately complex with four tier levels based on fhe age of the street and five different categories of streets. Additionally, the policy is dafa intensive in regard to tracking utility cut information and warranty requirements. • Although the draft policy includes the word "moratorium" for streets less than three years old, its description resul#s in no utility cut mora#orium on new streets. Our current adopted Spokane County Road Standards do not allow cufting or trenching in roads for five years unless it can be shown that alternatives are not available. Possible alternatives are boring, jacking, relocating outside the paved area, or installing the utility before construction or overlay of the road. I recommend that we continue our current five year moratorium policy. • Under the mafrix on page nine, the modified policy is allawed on rninor arterials and collec#or arterials aver six years old and on principal arterials over twzlve years old. This policy allows joints at the centerline of lanes. I recommend that all arterials be cut to the lane line and thad no cuts be allowed to the center of lanes. This recommendation is consistenf tivith our current policy. . • Under the matrix on page nine, french only is allowed in minor ar#erials and collector arterials aver 12 years old. The policy states on page nine under "Trnnch Only" that it does nat allow longi#udinal, joints in #he wheel path. Thnre is no exhibit showing the examples of haw this policy would be implemented. I recommend that all arferials be cult to the lane line and that no cuts be allowed to the center of lanes. This recommendation is consistent with our current policy. A more detailed review can be performed by Public Works if Council wishes ta pursue the implementation and enforcement of this policy. Community Developrnent - Initiaf Implementation and Enforcement: See At#achrnent #3 OPTIONS: lmplement the pavement cut policy as proposed; Recflmmend changes to the proposed policy; Continue with existing policy; Amend existing policy. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Provide feedback and direction to staff. Staff recommends continuing with the existing policy until further analysis can be conducted, BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS: Staffi estimates three additional employees would be required to implement and enforce the draff policy, at an additional cost of about $170,000 {see Attachment #3}. There are additional start-up costs, such as database creation, which have not yst been estimated. STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten, Public Works Director; Marina Sukup, Community Development Direc#or ATTACHMENTS: 1. Copies of current Spokane Valley ROW Permit Provisions; and the Spokane County/City of Spokane Draft Regional Pavement Cut Policy dated 2114/05 2. Technical Comparison of Proposed Policy to Current Standards. 3. Background Memo on Initial Analysis of Implementation and Enforcement Cosfs 'i Attachmcnt I ~ S`okane VaIley 11707 E Sprague Ave Sui[e 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org ~ - - - - - - Memorandum To: David Mercier, City Manager and Members of Council From: Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager Date: April 26, 2005 Re: Pavement Cut Policy - Copies of Current Policy and Draft Proposal Attached is a tfLrec, paee summan, af Spol:ane 'Valley's current Rjcht-of-Way Perniit. F'rovisians, along with the draft proposal af thc.l2cgional 1'aveinent Cut Po1icy. Our Cunent policy rcfcrs io nvo cnaui sets of standards: • Spokane County Standaa-ds fior R.oad and SPwer Cc)nstruction (SCSPRSC); wh.ich Spokane N%alley adc►pted upon incorpc►ration; ~ • Standards c.stablislicd b), the Waslunaton State Depaiuvvnt of Trausportation , (WSDOT). ~ , ' RtGHT OF WAY PERMIT PROVISIONS ' - GENERAL Fees and Rates In acidition tQ the permit application fae af $15.00, irtspecfion on eacis permit Mll be billed to the permittee at a r" ~ $50.00 pet hour witts a 525.00 (1!2 hour) minimum. Permitte:s segnature on perm3f aonstftutes an agreernenf ta f='.=: and below t?rms and provisions. SCSFP,SC 9.04 1. Authority. • This permit is issued pursuant to the Spokane CounEy Standards far Raad and Sewer Consfruction as adopted by the City of Spokane Valley and the lM1lashington Stato Deparfinent of Transportation (WSDO'n Standard Specffications far Road, Bridge and Municipaf CoRSiruction. SC5rrcSC 1.07, 7.06 2. Definitorts Ths ward "City' means the City af Spokane Vapey aciing by and through the Pubdic Worirs . Diref-tor or his duly authorized represerrtative. ~ 3_ Keep Permit an the Job This pennit shall be kQpi at the site qf the rvork and shalt be shown to any representative of the City, or any law enforcernent officer on request ~ 4. No Precedent EstablEshod This permit'rs granted with ihe understanding that this acfion is not to be considsred to esta51ish a precederrt conceming any kind of encraacttrnent within the City right-oi-may. SCSF°SC 9.01(7) . 5. Permits from Others When ths law requires the cons?ni to any wosk hereunder fr•~m any other public board or persan having jurisdiction, this permit shap be suspendeed in operation unlAss and until such ' _ - consent is obtained. SCSrRSC 9.41(7) . 5. Othsr Woric This Permit is to be strictly cans#rued, and Ro work oiher than that specifically mentianed is authorized hereby. SCSFRSC 9.02{1) 7. PaTmission from Propnrty O:vners Whenever it is necessary Uo secure permission from abutting property owners, sucfi authority must be secured by the per7nittee priar tD camrreenc9ng work. 8. Protecfion to the Pubtic The wflric shatl cause the leasi possible incvnvenienc2 to the traveling public. At least one- way traffic shall be maintained at al] times during tfie working day (7 a.m. to S p.m.) .Tv;= trafrc shall be maintained from the dose of the workino day to tie start af the next worl. ~ day. All waming signs, lights, devicP~ and p~rocedures shall canforrn to MU7CD and W~ Sfandard Specificafions for Road, Bridge and Munic'rpal Gonstrurtion. SCSFPSC 1.03, 8.01, 3.12, ¢.02 9. Standards of ConstrucFian Any matfer noi specificalty mentioned herein, or covered by direct reierence, shall conform io the SpQi:ane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construcbon and the Washington 5t2te Standard Soecmcafions for Road, Sridae and Municipal ConstRiction. SCSFRSC 1.01 10. Clry Supsrvis9on All work shatl be pp-rformed to the satisfaction oil the City. The Ci[y may inspecf the work but is not required to do so. SCSi-RSC 9.02, 9.04, 9.05 " 11. Ecpensp of Review and Inspection Ors work vrhich in ths judgement of the Crty requfres Engineering- Review ol plans andlor the presence of an emplayes of the Pubfic Works DepaRment as an inspector, the aciual oosf (incluciirtg salary, travefing expense, and overheadl of such inspection shall be paid by the , permitteA upon presentation of a statemen4 thetefar. The cost of any tests required by Lhe City shall be bome by the permittee. SCSFRSC 9.02(f) 12. Restoration of Right-ol-Way AA portions of the right-of-way, and. all adjacznt areas direcUy affzcting such, if disiurbsd by . work pursuarrt ta this permit, shall restore the surface of the right-of-way or public property fo a# least the currentty adopted City Standards or as required by the Pubfic Works Dirsctor thraugh a right-of-way permit dependirg an special circumstances.. . SCSFP,SC 8.04 13. Ex'rsting Utilities Ths pertnittee shall contad all utilities tfl deiermine the location of any ebstinn oacitities prior to ezcavaSon. The Washington One CaJI tickei number and nam= shall be kept on the job site and be available to any representative o; the City Public Works Departmen► or any taw enforcement afiicer on request The permittee shall also cantact the local water purveyar, sanitation district or other utiliry not affitiaied with Washington One Call to advise them of the ' proposed proJect The date and name af this coaftact must also be kept on the jon site. The . permittee shall immediately noUfy the ovming utility of any damage td tfiefr existing faciliiy. 14. Future Maving of Installatlon In the event ft beR.,omes necessary, in the opinion of fhe City, to remove or relocate tne i encroachment permitted hereunder, such shall be accomplishecf by and at the sole exp ~~w.;/' of the permittee, and vrifhin such tinze arid manner as may bc required by the City. SCSFr?SC 8.01 15. Joint artd Sevei-al Obliga6on If there is more than one permitlee subje^t to the terms csf ttiis permit, t;nen aIl W. the terms o1, ihi, perTnit shall bind the Rermittees individually and colfectively, ana said permiri@es shall bee individualiy and CoIlsCtively liable therefore. SCSFRSC 9.G2 ~ 1E. Mainfenance Th= permitfee agree:, by the axepfance of ftiis permit to exErcis2 reasonable care fo maintain properly any encroachmeni pla--ed by ii in the righi-o,-way and to exercise reasonable care in inspecfing for and immedi3lely repairing and making qood any iniuty to any portior, of the right-of-way whicn o::..urs 2s a resuli of the maintenance af the encroachmeni in the rignf-oi-way or as 2 resuli of the work dane under this permp, in;:.luding any and all injury to the right-of-w•ay which tivoutd nat have oc;:urred had such worY not fleen done ot such encroachmen4 nai eeen plaoed. .CSF-'r?SC 7U.02, 90.03 UTILITY AND UNDERGROUND 1. Cu`finc Pavement All constr=tion in asphalt shall b= horsonial-direciional bared wherever possibte. Open cut construcFion must be specrij:.ally perrnitted or may be autnorizeo Dy the CiEy insppctor to ac:ommadate unexaacted field condi6ons_ VJhen pavemeni is cu1 it shall be oone in a manner which r,auses the ieast passible damage to the adja:ent paveme,n:. At-ier the Litility is ptaced and the trench is ba:.kfitl?d and basee, the pavemant shall bp sawcut i-D a minimum of 1 foot aeyand the edge of tnc #rench in any direcfiian. kny cut; within the zravel=_d way shall be overcut io a full lane widfh at a minimum. I; the cs.ri extends bsyond centerfine, the final cali snall exi=nd the full lane widih. l;II cu#s shall be 4 minimum of 3 feet wide to accommodate sUfficiert ti.ompaction equipmen:. I; the trzncfi edge is within 5 feei of the edge o; ,he roadv:ay paverneni, the p2vement snall bE remaved ia the ecioe o; the roaoway. -;.:,A Vi'SJO i 5-04. a(1 111 2. Baozill and Compaction Bac4.fill an3 pavement material cDmpacfion slsall canf,rn to 1rJSDOT1.4PlNA Standard • Specifi;,ations i•~r Road, 6ridoe, and Municipal Canstruction . 3. Replacem=r-Ot of PavAment The surface of all trencties in he traveled ti2} shalt be ismporarily pa#ched or ot,`►=rwise suracev at the end o; each wori:ing aay. Such tempo;ary patchirng or other neld app; wed sur`acing shall be kept in a smeoin, firm, dus?-irze :anoition for the safe use o` the pubiic until ~ the nnal surface patching is completQd. Cold mix asphal; may be ussd as a d=_mporary patch material. Aner ditch edgss hav-e been sawcut, the bas_ and pevement shall b_ replaced. The thicE;ness cf the base and paving to be replaxd shall be d=terriined in the fiold and shall be ~ ai Ieest equal in section to ?hai aajacen: to the trench arsa. Pavement shali be a minimum of 2 incfies tfii^.k. Pavement shall be r?placec4 with hot mix as;nhal, which sha11 conform te state requirema-i#s fior 3f4" maximum msdiurn gradng. Ease material shall conform to Staie reqlirements far Base Course_ . WS-00T ;r04. 3(~)t ~ 4. Generaf IJlinimum cover over ufilities shall be 24 inrhes below finist, grade. Dispossl af spodl material shall be qutside the right-oi-u,ay unless othervrise specifically approved by the Clty. Maxirnum length of wark under construction at any 6m= shall not exceed 5000 fzet Reasonable care shall be taken to avoid damage tQ major raots e. trees. If an indepandent oonircEor installs a u5lity, the operator of the ujlity musi acceat the work • betore final approval of the v:or}; by the Ctfy. ' t4l= 5-04.3f51r 5. i2espansibility for Failures The psrmitt=e shalf be responsible oor correcting any 6aiiuras af any wflrk oone under thi, permit for a period o; twa years after campfe#ian M the projecL SCSr-r^,SG 16.02 6. Flve-yE3r prohibition Cutting vr trznching paverneM surfat,es that have been re onstructed within ihe .~ast fivz ' years shall be prahibited in acrardance wi#h the requirnments o( Spokane County Standards for Raad and Sewer Construction, Sscuon E.04. ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ . ~ ~ PARKt1:C/B1KE LM'E ~ ~ i . • ~ ~ ~ i A - dR111MC LAJJE 1 / 1' i. 1.-• 1 1~ 1 1 1 1 ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f I 1~~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 ;~,"s1 1 1 ~ DRMNC 1.ANE 1~ 1 I ` I 1 1 1 1 1 <',,y~- 1 1 ~ 1"~` 1 I ' I 1 1 1 1 1 ' PARXIltG/BIKE l,ANE Tj4AN SVIERSC CUT LONGtTUD1NAL CUT rRara uwrrs UNF . L.tJt UHF E r---~ ur+_ i i FINAL PA7CN U1ff7S (S,UW-Vt) fiAJ. OfPM PAKuENi REYOVAL (wtUM vAFtES) YIN • ~rx~ r . u.w. I ~ Y14. • A.C. QvaRed Surlaafip ACDrepofe UTdWTY x /\K~~\~/~\~~\ ~ j/\~~/\~~ yw. x/ rvo TEs V i i. i , Sewrat cirtQ F7emove existtnq A.C, to a minirnum o/ 12-rnches beyvmi exco.,ntian. 2. ff the edge of snwcvt l,s wJthiri 3 fce4 0/ the edge of the roadwny povwient, C`C~ ffo~ A_~1 the cnlire 5 fer.t s~yQ~r 5e removed. J[i r /-1 3. Hose moter;al shcrl7 be eamAucted per oppraved stondarda No7 To ScuC 4. Entirc •width of Aare !o bc compocted/re-earnpacled. 5. Alf base pnd Oovement materiofs and specrl7cotions to tolfow Aer'mit Provisiorjs. . Ci ty of Spdkan e VC7IJe)/ ~ ScQ1e: 30' ~ Pubfrc Works Deparfinen f Draaving No. Typical Utility Cut ,'~~✓~'.Ipair Requirements , ; Grown: 721-1-11" B~~• KS Attachment 1 SPOKANE ~ ~ ~ ►~~1 ' ' f•. ~ ! f1f1/];,`' ~ SPOMa COUIyTl' ► 1►~)) 1 1 REGronTA~ PANTENrENT cuT PoLIcy Fevrua,l- 14, 2005 rr7ROnucTIov 7niP local govPrnmenta1 Qntities within Spokane Counry are faced with the same challenges as many oi:her municipalitie.s (liroughout die country. PavPment cuts are anocessary operation aricl cartnot he avnided. Utilities need to se.rve new customers and repair existinD faciliLies. There is a common good for all utifities to be placed in the Public Right of Way. All parties shall strive to reducP th° burden to the taxpayer/ratepayer, and damage to the roadways. Studies conclucted by multiplc groups and organizations have detertnin£d that poorly re5tored pavement cuu cause pea-maneni structural and fvnctional daznage increasing maintenance cosu, iuture rehabilitation ~--~1 costs, and produce a rough ride. If realized, the i.ncrexsed costs and rouride are a burden for the tax.payerfratepayer. .As Exhibit A on paee eight shows, the pavement beyond the trench ma_y be weal.ened by sagring which results from loss of lateral support. Heavy consmuction traffic also wea):ens the area adjacent to the trench. Studies (see attached bibliography) have shown that the pavement lifc ma), be redur.ed by pavement cuts. Poorly constructed patches tend not to last through the life cf the existinj road and fail prsmaturel_y when there is a lack of good construction techniques used wlien backfilline and campacting. This causes an additional burden to maintenance deparements and taa:payers/ratepayers. A poorly construcied pavement cut usually requires re.pair before thA road n°eds to be resurfaced; problems typically appear in the firsi two years. Studies aIso reveal ilh3c patch are.as probably require thicker overlays compared to the rest of tLie pavement in the area. This also resulis in higher c4sts #o t1iE tax.payer/ratepayer. FX.TCUTTNTF> SUMM.A,RY 7'his document ouilines Spol:ane County and the Cit}, of Spokane's joint rejional policy regarding pavement cuts. It addre;ses excavation problems, construction requiremeiits, warranties and other rela.ted aspects. In addition; it modifes the fve _year new pavement cut moratorium; creating a neNv regional three-year cut rnoratoTium as outlined in this 3creement and e-xhibic B tier chart. Any road will remain available to be cut if there is no ather means to talce care of an e.mergency situation (lsr•oken watEr, Sewer or gas IinPs or as approved by the. Agency Enginecr). The Lfciliry shall atte.mpt Co use other innova#ive ideas for servicint! customers ocher than cuttincy into the public..Right of Way while not dirninishing safet_y standards. ~ nEr24TIUNS Yermittees: The uiility company or concractor who submits an application for a permit to obstruct and/or conduct construction operations in the public righC-of-way. Local agencie5 and ~ their contractors shall be considered permittees for application of this policy c.ven though the respective agencies and/or their contractors may not take out permits. Local Agenc.y: The governing entity having jurisdiction of the area that the permittee has submitted an application to obstruct or conduct construction operations. Agency Engineer: City or County Engincer; hislher designee (Engineers, Inspectors, PrUject lUlanagers; Ficld Personnel) representing a Local Agency. Standard $pecifications: Current version of the WSDOT Standard Specificarions for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction, Supplemental Specifications and/ar Drawings as attached by local agencies. Project Complction: Date when ttie following has oceurred: final permanent restoration of roadway is cotnplete and approved by the inspector, and all as-built documenCation has been submitted to the local agency. A fax transmittal confirmation ticket of `as built' shall be considered confirmation. New Roadway: Any roadway that has had a desi€med rehabilitation in the permitted excavation location that is less than or equal to three years. Lengtli of 1'atch: For this clocument the lengtri of all patches is the patch dimension parallel to the roadway. , Width of Yatch: For this docutnent the width of all patches is the patch dimension perpendicular to the roadway. Ass;,-nee: Th2 C-oIItr3cror who is takin.~ out the permit. Patch: CuE in the pavccnent as part of the currznt permitted job. COnTSTRCJCTIOr` REQUII2EKENTS 1. A pavement eut moratorium will be in eff-ect for a period of three years for all iiew roadvvays (see T'xhibit B). 2. No patching inaterial will be allowed withi❑ an existing patch if ttte new natch exceetls seventy percent or more of the existing patch. In this case, the entire existing patch must be replaccd. 3. All patchino ma#erials anci construction reguirements not addressed iri this document shall conform to cach Local Ageitcy's Standards, copies available from local aseneies. L,flngitudinaf euts that extend t1u'ough multiple tier classifi catioils will require discussion with the local agency to cletcrtnine appropriate patching approach. 1.n prineiple, each roacl section will be patched according to thc ticr in which it is ranked. 2 4. All exist:ing traffic coliti'ol marl:ings will be replaced as sc►on as possiblc aftr ~ perrnanent paving is completed. 1emporar?, markirigs fOr ]ane lines and stop lincs ;lial1 be in plac,t; prior to tlie. rQadwayo upen'tng for traffic. All remaining temporary siriping will be comnleied within seven days of new pavement completion and shall be maintaincd by pcrmittee until pernlanently restored. All trafiic rnarkines wilM be replaced per normal worl: practices, 5. Full depth full Iane pavernent removal and replacement shall be canstructed beyound the noininal completed trench edge longitudinall}f, and transversely per tier chart and notes. The goal is that the tee sPction will not arbitrarily force patzh inio adjacent: lanes, dependent on quality and aare oftrenching. T'he minimum lenglh of the patch paralle] to the road shal1 be six foet. [f any part of the excavation, patch or damaged area intrudes into an adjacent lane, that larie shall also be replaced per the tiered chart. FCr ne.w patches adjaccnt to an), existing patch; all actempts \vili be rnade to install the uti]in, at the existing pdtch line. V1'lten this is not feasible, no izap of Ceet or less shall exist. 6. The permitrtce shall be allowed to mal:e emer~~:ncy repairs provide~d a more reasonable altemative does not Exist. Every reas4nable efforr will be macle to restore the roadway quiekly. (Note: an emergenc), will not allow pe;tnittee to coordinate and plan Xvith a.sphalt cornpany). (See "Repairs of Pavemen? Cuts"). 7. Onl}, saNv cuttiog or approve.d ixrindine device will be allowed. Only parallel and perpendicular pavemen# cuts will be allowed. Aio jaggcd, broken or widcrmined edges. 8. Bicycle/pedestrian/parE;inL,ltravel lanes to be repaired per tier charf and attached drawing,s. 9. F.ach Local Agency shall have the prerogative to encourage the permittee to conU-ibute permittee.ys nonnal patching cosls to local agencies to accomplish paving or full depth replaaement ot the roadway. ("I'his cioes not apply to work done within larger projects; i.e. scwer projects). The Local Aoency should be notified of existing problcros with the adjacent roadway to a proposed patc.h. Evenj efi'ort will be made to leverage both utility and agency dollars for sl.rec.t improvements. 10. When 2 or more paCChes are created within a Qiven job that measure ] S feet or le;s iongitudinally or transversely they will be incorporated into a sinole patch. A.nylime five or more patches arc retlnircd withiri a 33-0-foot longitudinal area, the utility Xvill . notify the agency to determine if cost sharing is an option to expand the pavemeilt re;iairlreplacement area. 11. Potholing to f nd utilities shall be allowsd. The use of innovative technologies is encouraged {}:eyhole etc.). To he exempt from the gap and patchinb policy, cuts shall be a maximum of two square fept with no longitudinal joints in the whee.l path and shall be backflled with conirolleci density or othe.c approved filf from sil inehes above the uti] ity to six i;iches below botcom of asphalt. Round vs, sqttare cuts are preferred. 3 12. Chip seAled roads shall be rehabilitatccl according to construckion reyuirements for asphalt roads a.s outlined in this cfocument. 13. All temporary traffic control for the work zone shall conform to the M`UTCD and ~ Washington Stats modif cations to the MUTCD. All traffic conirol is subject to the approval of the Agencv Engineer or llis/her designee (See temporary patching section). 14. All existing pavement types shall be conshvcted at the existing dEpth af asphalt and crushed surfaeino, in accordance with applicable Local Agency Standards (including any fabric or membranes); however, the replaeement section of a,sphalt aiid crushed rock shall not be less than the minimum section specified in Local Agency's Design StFUidards. 15. .411 concrete road cuts shall be pre-approved before beginning work (except in the case of an emergency situation). Concrete roads shall require full panel replacement unless approved othenvise by local agency. All concrete joints shall require an approved tie bar and dowel retrofit. Depth of cnncre[e renlacement shall match the existing thickness, or as per Iocal Agency's Standards. Care shall be macle not to undermi.ne the existing panels. If the adjacent panels are disturbed or damaged, they also shall be replaced at the discretion of the Local Agenc}'. All joints shall be sealed with an approved material. 16. Asphalt over concrete road cuts - if l:nown - shall b^ pre-approvcd before bcginning work (except in the case of an emergency sihiation). Saw cuttinb or ot=her approved % practice for removal of the concrete shall be allowed at the ctiscretinn of L.ocaJ Agency. The asphalt portion of the cut shall be constructed according to the pavement cut policy. 17. All area.s outside oF the roadway that are aff.ected by the work shall be restorcd to their original condition. All shoulders shall be restored to their original condiiion. 18. Valve and manhole repairs shall be exempt from tlie patching requirements of this policy. Valve and manhole patehing requiremcnts shall be per eacb L,flcal Agency's Standards. All warranry and eons"ction requirements shall be met. No longitudinai construction joints s6all bc allowed in the wheel path. 19. The permittee shall provide h detailed "As-built" record of the pavemcnt cut after construction is completecl. 1'he permittee shall providc details indic;ating etisting pavement section, new pavement section and ajiy unusual conditions at the location of the constructed utility. `I'he location shall include the name of the road the work is being perf.ormed on and [he name af the closest intersections in each direction. Taistance measurements shall bc from intersecting streats. This informatioct will be providcd io the .I,ocal Agency's Permit departmenc for a permanent record. 7'his infQrmation shall be reCurnetl no later than seven days after the completion of the permitted project by mail; fax, or other electronic means by either permittee or patching contraciar. The intent of ittis process is to record small patching details. Lrtrger projezts shaEl be reviewed and approved prior to eanstrtic:tion. 4 20. The moratorium policy will be explained both as to cosis and to constructiqn prascicps bl'the I..QCaI .4gencies as part of the perniitting/zoning process for new constrtletion or major remodeling nrqjects. Individual permittees/utilities will not be responsible for this function. lndividual perniitteeslutilities will be responsible for doing the work and the costs associated witli die moratorium policy as they open roadways for work. CASt recovery from developers will be calculated and coordinated by permitte.e/uiiliry. SURFACF SMQO'i'H1-,'F.SS RTQUTREMENTS The completed surfacs of all courses shall bv of uniform texiurc; smooth, uniform as t:o crown and grade and free from defecls. The rrompleted surface of the wearing c4urse shall not vary more tiian 114 inch fi•om the lower edge of a icn fuot straithtectge placerl parallel to the ecntetline. Reco6mition and consideration will be made for existin? roadway conditions. The .4gency Engine,er inust approve cQrreciive measures. WARR.A.rT1' RE()UIREMENTS Pavement cuts on road«<ays ten years old ar less will have a warranty period oi five years. The patch in the roadway sha(1 be repaired as necessary until the warraniy has passed. .Al1 other roadways shall requil•e a minimutn z'tlree-vear warranry period. All warraniies shall be:cotne void if rehabilitation ~+~ork is performed to the. road v~rithin the patching lunits. ~ For road cuts performed by a Utility using its internal capability, that Utility or assigiiee witl be responsible for repairs required during #lie. warranty period. E►.tl curb, sidewalks and struccures that are affected by the eacavation sball be included in this policy and have a warranty for f ve years. V4'AtFLt1N7Y PROVTSIQNS 1) Sunken pavement patches r,,rreater than or equal to one-quanpr inch (Measured by a ie.n-foot straight edoc). 2) 'Visual rating of patch = to medium or high (Per Agency's rating prc►cedure). 3) Visual rating of construction joint = to medium or high (Per Acency's rating procedure). 4) Paor worl:manship (To be determined b), cach Agency's En;ineer). 5) Cnmpac.tion requirement per Agency scandard. b) Stinken or dainaged curb a3id sidewalks in excavation work area (To be determined by each Age,nc.y's Engineer). 5 7) Sunlcen or damaged dry~,vtills and caich hasins in excavation wor1: area (7'o be determined by each Agency's rngineer). REi PAY12S OF FAVE.NIIC\`T CITTS !f emergency repairs are needed due to safety concerns, the permit#ee shall liave twenty-four hours in which to malce sueh repairs from time of verbal noiiec by the Loeal Aaency. For non-emergency repairs on arteriai roads the pcrmittee shall have forty-eight hours to make suclt temporary repairs. Resideniial streets, the permiriee shall have up to seven days to make such temporary repairs. If these repairs are not accompiished within the specified timeframe, the work shall be privately contractett by the Local Ay..•ncy or the Loca[ Agenc_y's maintenance crew shall perform the needed repairs. The permittce will be assesse,d all costs associated witli ttie repairs. The costs shall Ise ba..sed on the average bid items for comparable projecb for the year preceding plus ten percent overhsad fees. If repairs are made other than seam scaling io the warranted patch a new warranty wi(1 be implemented for the new patch. The permittee shall have hvo days to notify their asphalt company of the needed permanen4 repairs. If the work is not done in a iimely man.ner and following notification the work shall be privateiy con'tracte.d or Local Agency maintenance crews will perform the needed repairs. The permittee shali be assessed the associated fees for the repairs. All utilit}, cut construction shall follow the construction and w•arranty requirements per local agencies standards. TENIYORARX PATCfMNG During winter asphalt concrete paving plant closures or outside of tecnperature specife,ations (see section 5-04 of the standard specifications) the permittec shaU install and maintain a temporary natch until it aan construct apertnarient patch. A temporary patch will be required if the road must be opened to traffic before a permanenl patch can be mada. The temporary patch shall consist of two inches of crushed surfacing and rivo inches of cold-mix asphalt pavament and/or steel plates, or upon approval of the Agsncy Engineer, crushed surfacing top coarse may be used. On arterials, when a temporary• patch is requued for morf: than two months, Portiand Cement Cnncrcte sliall be used to construct the temporary patch (Contact Local Agency for mix design requirements). The permittee shall maintain the temporary patch until the patch has been permanently restored. PERNITT5 A.II work in the `Public Right-af Way' requires a pennit. Permittee shall take out all permits and perform al1 worlc. The permilCee shall fax oe send a letter to the appropriat'e Local Agency permit center designating [heir ass ira gnees. The pt;rmittee will be required to submit a construecion and traffic control plan (traffic eontrol f'or arterial work and roadways above 30 Iv1.i?.4-[..) when applying for a perniit. lf the Agency Cnsineer ~ deterinines that abuse of obligations are prevalent Cuture construetiOn permits sliall not be issued until the " 6 perrnitcee has rulflled all obligations to existing permiis. «iririen notificalion by Local .ADency will be sent prior to this at;lion. ltL•"SPONSiBLE PARTIY 'rflie peemitiete sliall be responsible for all eonstruction and warranry requirements of this policy. Utilities will provide identiry of excavator/permittee as known to local agencies. Local agencies will attemnt to get perinittee to correcr warranty defects. If pennit:tee is a subcontractor for utilities, tMe utilities will assume responsibility i; perminee can norlwilf not malce rapairs. V1'A.RTFRS :A.ND E)MA1I' I`lONS lt is understood that rield conditions ma), warrant a waiver or an excmption from these re-gulations. °ermiitee. may fle for a waiver; and such waivers shall be at ilie discretion of #he ADency Engineer or his/her clesigmee. YOLICI' TtE1T1EV1' The local agencies ,vill hos: a meeting with each o;het and other interested stakebolders at the e»d of each construc#io❑ seasoti for the purpase of revieNving the offectiveness of the policy for the eomplete.d Lonsti-u:.tion sezson and sugLested improvements for fucure constrvction seasflns. ~ 13iBLIOGR.APHY "Trcncli Restoration Requirements". City of Bellevue. "Utility Trench Cut Restoration Specifications". A!Ie[ropolitan Transportation Commission (January 1997) "Asphalted Paveme»t Warraniies". Wisconsui Deparlment Of 7'ranspor[ation (June 2001) "[mpact of Utiliry Cu1s on Pavement Performance". Cin, of Scattle "Managing Utilit}, Cuts" A]'«'A (August 1997) "Gas ].ndustry's Use of Public Right-of-Way" A.G.A. Vrliite Paper (September ]998) "Pavement Cut and Repair Standards Manual" DPW&T Ciry of Dallas (October 2003) 7 TYPICA.L TRENCH. EXCAVATION LXFT.T,i3IT A - ~Asphalt Concrete • Wearing Surtace - - ' ~ • . .q. :;4. . . ~ o 4 . ' rr.•Q a f.• q.. a. s, o a Concrete e, , a Q e Elndercuttine o' 'Pavement Base ~ e -Pavement ' e ° o • ~ . ~ Q O ~ e . 1 O ~ O O o • ~ ~ ~ o p 0 1 Q ` O ` ' e ~ 0 ~ s O Sag from Refease 5upportin9 . of Lateral Support Soil - ' Pavemeni Weakened By Excavation . - - ~ J $ Y 4vLmEnTT cor roLIc>> EXIIMrr s TieT 1 Tier 2 7'ier 3 Tier 4 .Arterial Streets: 5 3 years Years 4-5 1`ears 6-12 >]2 Years Modified Principal 3vioraxorium Policv Full Policy Full Policy Policy A9odificd Trench MJt1Qt' Nioratgrium Polic. + Full Foiic y Po1ic , Onl ' ModiTiecl Trench Nei ghborhood Collector Moratarium Policy Full Policv Polic Only ~ Local Access StreP#s: Modified Trench Fndustrial/Commercial Moratorium Policy iVlodified l'olicy FolicL I Qniy A1od if ed Ti-ench Residentia! ➢vloratoriutn Policy Modified olicy Polic ~ Only Exhibit B Notes ~ A9oratorium Policv = Half roadway or full roadway replacement for longitudinai cuts in ne", roadways. This policy requires prior approval from Agency having jucisdiction. Full I'olic•, = Policy w/paving to established/dedicated lane lines. Cut full depth 2 feet beyond excavation. No r*aps < 4' from curb or gutter. vlodifed Pqlicy _!f no striping for lane line, lane is = tA 12'; can paECh to middle of lane lines, cannot leave any gap <4` from curb or gutter. Cut I' beyond excavation. Trench Onlv = Cut l' be}rond excavation all locations. No lotigitudinal joints in the wheel path. T`ote: tt i5 the di5cretion of each jurisdiction to revie.w the individual road segment ages to detennine patch requirements on longitudinal insu}Ilation over rnultiple roadway segme.nts with variab]e ratings. In principle, each road section will be patched according to the tier in which it is ranked. Note: Any deviation from the Tier Yolicy will rerquue approval in advance by the local agency. Nofe: E•ach agency will provide date of last major reconstivct eitlier electronically or on each permit. Maintenance does not constitute a reconstruct for age, de.termination. Note: Moratorium policy will be revicwecl as seam-sealing technologgy improves. 9 ASPHALT AND CONCRETE PAVEMENT REPAIR Permitteo Name: ~ Job Address: Coordinates : C3Street ~ pt no nnusc numfler, oleaso li,t hundrntl-Dlock) (Exam ptc : 1 SN 24" Q Alley ProjecUTask t#: Date Cut: Crow: POIJob i3: CltylCounty Permlt Unusual ConditionslSpecial Instructions: 7ier#: 1 2 3 E (Plcase dtcle) Palicy: A4oratorium Full Modified Trench {PleSae ccr.lo) Condition af Cut Type of Work Tvae of ReQair Existinsa Road Condition (CIrc1a ,rvy mat aanlr) 6" Gravai (rcquired) Gas Asphalt Depth of Asphalt Cold IUiix Electric Concrete Depth of Cravel Winter Mix Water Sub 8ase Type Savrwt CATV Grind Communications Sewer ~ Other Asphaft J] ( I~~ I Width Lenglh X CIL - mm- - i- - me- - - - - -.~.m~ove X ~ X ~ I x 1 I I 1 Concrote Widlh Length ~ ❑ ~ l I x x I I sViping (linear foot) ( I -----~--------------i---- Date Sent for Repair: Date Completed: crL Patching Co. Signoff: (patching tompany to fax ta local agency at completion) 1 i Fax Completed Form to: Spokane County, Sylvia Lightfoot: 5091477-7198 City of Spokane, Dan Eaton: 5091625-6124 i0 1"1 Xil113IT R] MORATOKIUMIFULL P(7LICY - ARTERIAL CURe uH= ~ A I IANE 4 LAPlL LINE - - - - - - iRL4cM ~ ~ - ~ir• I~~\~ ~T''~~~ ~iw~ L1~aE J STFt--ET C/L ~ I' (T~) LadE 2 LANE Un : ~w'~ -T~ ~ I ~ iz' (rrv) Pt.RrIr~ j=. ww f`1 I I ~ LARE 1 , -r- LIt,= ~ (rtPy FkRKIPtG CURS JVE srw:R/WATM rcATrut (-.IP) scrGa (iW) ~ rime 'u..t ot?Tr+ ~np~ SF~1CE (T19) F£PLRCEWENi IS FE7L TO c N• r4risvEt-~E cuz i na:anioir,~n+ r.~,Y a,r~ ~ec,~ fLrM~l4W3 SIISTtwLt flE7WCL1: W!'a UNE 4 GUFE IS L£.^ l1tiAO hFT. ~ W11(1; PA141NQIT 5] YRD CLD D4 lI9S C (Ufh.24TDH1UN). A PRS9'tiT PA7d1 IS RLG'O LAM LAW T~J 7HE5: LNIfF, `IU .GNTS OP. Fi£f1UC71Dt1 W PAW1M LwC FIP.L-U'J'1FI PF.1£N_TNT MN0VAL U1E IU2.R Afi•' AlLDID-~. (1tP) (wtD7M VMIG) ~ MILI PA~£MCNT S CR£ATT_3! TN.vi 3-efL ClD, 1!I ~ TFEncw H:c ~~V'NEIl7 PATCMI: R170 ro rr:r= ao c*'°) laxrs a>. s~axna+ ~4 ui~ ~ ur aeaxm.• + ~ irt04iJ-1 6MS5 xT 70i' CF PAVE1tL1CT a ♦ / y 2L~2g'. :SiL (T1P1 mflc~ I/ ~ / ~ OCJ:VAWf ~ 1. FIP1-OE7TN Pr.VEPENT PATOI JDIItr y11µy DI 3LALCA 2. n11 a1T? 7~ P~'G'9KJJL,~A 7C DfiEC110~ Oi TRAV? SEr`Y1QN A A I•w\ 4\`6~\ ~ fl.earuGE 0,4\V6V7i R[PlACCIMIri IS RCn 70 rxe nM AouMi: axM vrxx-oec, ~ an :u N, RrdONAL ?AV ZIv1~A' i GUT P41.ICY ~~r. ~;a OP. RsT:1fEx:.: a= ASIttr ~ aRTERIAl 6: S1AP0°i uATi c%7EN05 3flOtA S1:H lh£ ~ E4~1 lAOFt6TOR1Uld ( FULL POLICY ~~BIT F,l':HTBIT B2 MORATORI"UdVI1FU11L POLICl' - RES[DEn`TI_4L lI.OCAI. ACCESS CURB LINE ~ PAF2KINU ~ s UNE ~.►~r~ o. {t») LAN= 2 STTi[ET -J4. . IT (Tef) LANE 7 PARKING "'r, `L~~ ~ UNE 1~') \ A I a' {rn} PARIaNv CUR3 LIIdE :Vra/whTFR - z~ =~rv,c~c (rm) r~m~ ;~ra) scxgt t~rrl • nvTt: cuLt a~nnr _ ar.n6aCQ40 is W[e'o yo SRONSV:RSE CUT LONGITUDIY4! CV'I aFiB!INE KHCIJ-P.EUNHWG DISTWY BElMECN LnNC UNL ('c ClR3 13 IYSS 'MMi 4-Yt. i Fr u(j. LI.Y: Lylr MHEN P4K_L1CHi IS S t7S OlD OH Lf35 UNE FULI D:P71'd PA1M17 f2NOl'!S ~ ~ Fc-1 fNDR•.10111UNI n PAVQ@1T PAj:H 13 n.,.KxWi (N1D74 ViVU[5) REClD 79 iHCS: 41O3 tA3 JOPdT'a OF .3"cOU."T1011 Y: APEA M'L AlUI/3i. 1WE11 PAlitlf111 IS C?UT£P. THNI e11i1. wl l.~.J 3-'rNS OLD, A P4KOK1l7 nRT^JJ IS RCO'il Td 1ti;S'. UWJ71 MO AIt1T5 (A l• AfpOL11011 tV MCA lFi At10'hED.' ' ~ ~ h- tr~Ncr: uurts At mP w =rv~u.nT i csrs (Tro) cKnm`~niU" ' / • 1. FULL'-3'iH PAYiIkHT PATpI ,lWJ73 .°,N,Al.L OC $SAL6D. IkJIT9 1. r.ll CJiS TD 06 AGPDp•'OIDA.PIi 7G A:iIEC11011 ai' 7R4v£!. A[PUtPU9Ii S sipC'o TD iFf +rLXi iEG110N A-A /'J,1►[fMi CV9, PADI:IN'. OA W!E wc w,:XeV'3 TW+a a3 •.~~~N~ r~EG10NAL ?AV_n~:N i CU i POUCY pESiUA,9NiCE OF I.~Htii GF Wr?Or.i REWlDEKTIAi/ LOCAL ACao^o NAYI, {}f1}[*S ffKk~O 9J'h U:IE, I Soav~• , ,,1 ~ hlORATORIUM /FULLPOU EXH21T ~ ~ Ea'I3I-B1T 133 MORATORIUM/FUI..L f'OL1CY - INTERSECTIONS M 00 010 --A- c~ 17J.~, ~ • , ~ .~~-.ti ~ ~ ~ - 1 L ~i . R ' NaM cvu-CErnr runuCENZ+r s \ . \ _ ~ ~~ua~~ ~ -r i ~ I t. FULL-O~iH PAYENFDIT PATGH .R?(i5 51AL1 Da SFpI-M. ~gr w p ~ ? ALL W'19 W 6E CNYCf10KXIlMSO Ol'lICC4KM' Cf TitA1E1.. w1t7i PAKMCNf 19 Lu5 TNwtt S. RCPCACElt71i IS REOb SD TlIC NDff A0.MGEl.'7 Cl&1t1, ?rlRS a.D Ofl I:SS IM6UTNWLO. PARXLK+. OR LANE WE kMFJtM'R A 9R£NF4 CER A A&vEV-ZT(i PA101 C`i w?'f TO M37URD-N~ OF AS-KO"i 011 3UP?OFn NAYL 1M9G.139 alli!SE LNITS N6 .Ah IS WI BsYO%0 'SUCIt Ll'r_ RSDIKiX)N N AAFA /RE M.l.OYm. riHET' ?A1£NiN7 5 CBfAIUi \ l awi 5.-116 Q0, A PA.ET.TT ?4T04 IS i~-~q'D10 1NCg lJIGTS. ND aYY• 15 OR ~ry7~Hg REGIONAL PAVEbAENT GU7 . dJCY SIMJCI" K AqA ApQ IHTlR:CGTIOIIS I,LCt1m• pA1iiLNJ1 TJITS Ai too Or g~yq~ MOAATORIUM ( FULL POLIC7 > EXH-MIT B4 MODITIE, D POLICI' - ARTE•R1AL dJR3 LIKE 1 R1L-OCZ'! ?!.Y_LfENT a!?LkCoU91T 6 fl£O'D Sn 1-r7 WN 9EYDND TREK01 UvlM EIICNtl PAW)ADa RESTORATd: TO L.UIE lllE OR WF. C/1. 10 AVOID '+l1ECi PATtt {7YF+} LANE { IADL !1N= urE c/~ ti1&.~..: A~ - UulTS WE g sTuEer c/L LWF C - IY (Tf.a) LANE 2 A ~ !.A.IrE UNE 6. ~ - - - - - ~(-n-p-) t, tY (TM') l..AN= i PARKING I 1 r dtN LINE Er (M)' pARlatfC CURS LW= 1, yN sewsF+lw~hx vu~ f'ttt~) s:rF.~t tr~) ' i+osE Nls. n-Lv -uf (~TP) Stl~vKE (TYS') NEPIACF.NEYT 15 RCOb iQ iRANSVERSE CUT I ONGIIUDI !Al_C:LT CU'B ui+C Ki1Cd nExti-^iuir DISIANCE 13 I~ ~D+YHMI V k f-FT. W~E Ch ES3 1YEJi PA1FIXi1T I$ CRCAiFA MUI 1Mff ~E C WNE ~ OR 1'ULL-C:.PM PAV£MJiT IPJIACL'NUJi REO'D W,~UYL' OR 5-y1G p,0. A CAVOI*JJi' PATCH IS OA1~1E]iT 10 TMM l11A75 WtFN Y KN NDItWl2 fUl.i eFUD i0 TFESE lfYiiS. HO JlYMS OQ (rrr) ~ WA NHEEL PA1H {1VDTi YAP:E7 ~ Rf]UC110fi IH !F£.t IAE AliON:'Ll' V ux litP) NCT MA iiS)fdi W115 AY ia' W PA1k31FJ77 wQ Qhim UTILITI t. nu 7FP4N PAVeId?7i CATW JbNTu 6/ 94A11 6f SEAI,fiO. ESTC (iTP) nrti~a~ ~ y~~, 2 ALL °UTi SFVSL ee PCPPGalY11LAq OIGYAi1G7 TU Uft£7CII04 07 1R4\FL tNIi4 gQs110N A=A ~ t :..IUGRKd 1 PAYFl.~'!11 F2T'UCE~1 IS It'C2P iD WE UIL' CR UNE LJt. WKENEIg'• ~ irm"cm "R REClONAt FAVEMEWT CU'1' F'9UCY asctua+uccE a asaMAt'r 09 r'OF~a~E ~K~t1"poPN~nsn' r.xhWs wTO - ' . anTERieu. ` EXHBI7 svraourm MODIFIED POLICY S4 12 FXHIBIT BS MUD1FIE n POL•ICY - KESInENTlA WLOCAL ACCLSS ~ i'U.L-OMTSt Pm£NF3C1 ROV;:E1/fTfi IS flEC'D 74 1-FT Nllt 9CYOND 1R]t:Jf LIIIRA rXR11U PAYD/FJIT FiiStORI.nQ4 IU UtiE UNE Oi lwlE C/L TD AWD W!1rP PnTt1 Ct1P) CURB U14E IANE UNZ - - - - - - - - .a f' - (nv) tAN: 2 \ \ STREt i C/L ~ n~ - • G• ~,r 1 f rrr? 1 ~ ~ uwE ~'n. tz" (trr) LAN[ i qlH TII rA ac' nwY P.0.RKINc ur~ iURB ? IN[ ~ u N ?Fr~rt/►.u~ wAIEx (sw) s:Wu tT`+o6 - Nor.E: -J ruLL :,EPrn Cry?) sv+~:;x {zr•i RLruCEMDrT is fii--Yj , I OItG17LIQIVA.L CU7 ~F UA. Yl~~7 P.Ek.nJfl1:L ~~.~RS: Cll l - 01STIJIG' CIRMfSTI I.ekr UK,- L CUFH IS -7HlJ: /-M_ w.-. LNC 0R LME t01E OR I-m;7Ng lA1C C/L RlIL-0G°TH ?A'F11F.1.7 FCPl.4~E4Ctrt R9 i LAK= C/L ~ Pa~£l7TJtT 1U i/~'L UuIT9 Mt{N 1' ~Jt .~'F,1!ilv/:. FASS \ YH~?i PA4ENFI:T 1~ 'REA7f: 1NOJ~i W/I WWM pora th'orn vuREs) I 5-Yp5 ~I}. PA\£1,EJR IS -y • pAk'N TD 7r{M lLM'TS ND .KMITS 6i 9t~lA."116J Iti AF~t. UiL ALLO0I'D: MII (Tl?} IJOT h!1 r7JJJf -MaLl ~ T G}.TH mJI u~~1~ tH u~CiS nT t0D Lf rt4o.en 7 vnurr Xa Tr+rl' f(~/ 1 CTC iiYP) TRJJW FUU.-flEPYr: pAK]AJlT P.ATCN ,1pOF7F, EYCkVRiiQI 4fwL'. E*_ Q►m w 2. Ui 411T5 9i+k'_ H!: PG4PQIdQ1L1R SU3u^ttMf ro dC-c74W oc mAv-- sscnav A-• 3, v.cVEu_N3 RSt.nCUQlr F. R;qU ro !u:_ LJtE Ofi UJ~E C N'~s."H.M•_-t E17mmcN aa osra u. o: ' CCCENSKSM ~ R=~ON.4L ?A\cMEIJT Vi1T POUCY ~ A~,rSiILT Q? SI,FP~ NAiL ti1'~~NEI RE":IpENTAL JLOGAI. ACC£SS eXs ~75 INTO MHE1 ?AlF s•v~or~ rtAODIFIED POUCY 55 13 ~ 0 Al'tachment 2 ~ Proposed Pavement Cut Policy v.s. Current Standards 'f'eClinicRl Gpmparison Proposed Pavement Cut Policy Current Pavement Cut Standards Policv Underslandinci and Comvliance 13 page document describing slandards and requirements i page document describing slandards and requirements 5+ ditferenl details depiating possible repair requirements 1 detail depicting sarnple excavatiuns and reqtjirecl repairs ""I"iered" ehart o( rEquirertients ovitli rriuHiple iefetenoes Same requiremenls applied to each Ci.it urilass an exemption back and forth throuyhout docurnenl is iequesled and approveti Cantractors wiable to bid piuiects withoul applying Inr pcirrtits Conlraclors can piclc up Provisepns and deteil and bid any project in order to iigure out what polecy will apply to the particular sito in tlte city withoul apptying and paying ior a pemiit tha{ they rriay not n=ed Pavement Cut Standards 3 year "Moratorium Policy" alkcwls ciils in brand new paverrtent as a rule S yea► h.loratoiiurn - PJO cuts in new pavernerit !pi (ive years. Exernpkions are etmsidereci in sWecial cas=s vrhere no olher option is availahlo. Slaniny at a years ot age, sorne coads are allowed to be cut at if2 lane After the 5 year Moratoriurii aII roads are ireated the same, Save (vi additional replacerneni. This lapers uff to Irencli only cuts bQino allovred at 12 years nl age consideration on Atferials. Allrn•afny liench only ciifs virtually rliminales ihe tivhan there are siill several years lefi in the design life of the road.(Desiyn aye for iemaincter oE lhe design lifs of an oldcr ruatL C;uicenHy, Pmphasis is placed ori new roads are generally 15-20 yeais) prnper care oi these ruads in order to rlsfer rnaintenance cosls. as tar as passible. I.vngiiuctinal cuis ere to be overcut based on the "Nominal trench edge" nll lanes at(eeled are teplaced in order to insure tliat no jaints tall tivithin the wheel which coulcl place thp saviCtil wilhin Ihe wheel paFh depending on tivhere in palhs. There is virtually no adverse atfect to the integrity oi Ihe pavement. the tier the cut falls. Using "NominaP" leoves the location of the satvcut as a random approximation that, if virongly inlerpretcd, could advcrscly affect tlte inteariiy o! Ihe pavemeni. "Gvery reasonable effUit will tye marJe to iestnre the roadway quickly. Temparary paichiny rnuSl trQ ii► place, following emergency repairs, lhe same day (Note: an emergency will nat allcrw perrnittee to coordinale ansi plan with oF the rapairs beforr the uNlily leavr:s Uie sife. Permittee must schedule (inal asphalt company)." patc.hing voiih a;,phalt company irnrriediately, "Potholiny to find utilities shall be allowed." "...cuts shall be a maximum oi rothuliiiy is yaimally treated as a transverse open cut ber,aus°, in most cas°s, hvo syuare feet tivith no longitudinal joints in the wheel paih..." 2-3 polholes are cul for a singls crossing and none of thetri are less than k sq ft. "For non•emergency repairs on arteiial roads the permiltee shall have 48 hours Terripurary patching rnust be in place, (ulluv:inu eineigency repairs, the sarne day to make such temporaiy repairs. Residential slreets, the peimiltse Shill havA of lhe repairs beiore Ihe ulilily 1Paves lhe site. FeRnittee niusl sehectule iinal up to seveai days to make such lernporary repairs." rale:hiny %-h1h asphalt company immecliafely. (Winter months)On 2rteri2ls, vrNen a ternporary patch is tequired for more than All arlerials are +equired 4o be patchpd tivilh Portlanci Cement Concrete as a two months, Portlanct Cernent Cnncrete shall be used to construct 1hs temporary rneasuue during the winter asphall ptarit Closures. lesser raad temporary patch, classifications may use PCC or cotd mix depending o+i the particular siiuafion. The permitiee will be required to siibmit a conSlruUinri and lraEfic control plan TraffiC Conbol Flans are required ior any wprlc lhat has an irnpact on traftiC fltnv (traffic conltol for arterial work and roadvrays above 30 M.I'.H.) when applying ( Tlte Uiily areas with speed zones unclei 30 Wtl'-'!-1 ar= School Zanes and Packs ) for a pErryiil. Citv Workload and Investment 1-2 Additional ROW Inspec?ors vrill need to be hired in order to handle 'I ROW Inspeclor fiandling all flnal inspecfions along avilh Gr3ding Permits the 2-3 site visits to process and inspect aach pa+rement cut pemiit anci other issues 1 Database msnager would need to be hired to maintain and upgrade Pavernen► clatabase intormation noi necessary for current permit processing the Centcrliria f'h4S Database to hanctle all ot.he reqtiireci reference infcnnaHon needed to process each pavement cut permit 1 lull lime R04V Permit Clerk would need to be hired to hantllo thu 1 1'ermit Glerk handles all R0W Fermit prpCess+ng as 20% of her rmr'r,load additional effaRs invalved in the cumbersnrne processing of each parmit t iull timelpart time Filing Cler:< would need :o be hired in order to handle No files ere currently maintained outside of the PLUS system for i20W Permits the additianal filing of detaited prelim(nary applir.ation plzns, inspeclion logs and as-builts CenEerline PhAS 17al2base would nesd ta be upgraded to handle the higher Pavemerit ciatabase information not necessary for Cuerent ryennit processing level of defaif required by the new polEcy il ii's capaqle of doiny so PLUS Sysism would also need additianal rnodifitaiions made in order to RLUS currenily handles all RUW Permits handlQ tho ac4ditiorial pracessing and inspaction requirements A speed zone clatalsase vrould aIso nesd Eo be created and maintained Traffic Control Plans are required for any worlc tliat has an irnpact on traffic ilotiv in-housa in order ia detQmiine the need (or fraffic control plans to be submitled with each permit application ~ . Atlachment 3 s`poll~ane Valley 11707 E 5pra gue Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley NJA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 569.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org Memorandum To: David Mercier; City Manager and Members of Council From: Nina Regor; Deputy City Manager; Marina Sukup, Community Development Director Date: Apri126.2005 Re: Pavement Cut Policy Proposal - Initial Analysis of Implementation and Enforcement Ar the ApriJ 5, 2005 Study Scssion; Public Worl:s Dv'ectnr Neil Kersten preserned information on a variLty of pavement related issues; including a fii-st touch on a proposed regional pavement cut policy. Spokane t'alley ~vas inviied to participate in the dr.a:f`ting of the prApnseci policy; but due to staff`ing conshidnts; the City dec-icled to react to the proposa] onct di•afied. 7`he ~ purpose of thl's menZOrandtun is to sununarize aii initial analysis of the staffulo and other requirenlents to implement and enforce the proposed policy. Please note tha't staff continues to gacher ii2forination on tlus topic.. Current Pro2r:im Spokane Valley adopted Spolcane Coutity's utility cut standards, and is operatiiie its program based upon those standards. ln 2003, Council approved two employees for tlle Right-of-wa}! (ROW) pe.rmitting Function - a Permit Specialist and a Construction lnspector. ThE Council set the initial perinic fPE at S16 plus clle review and inspection FeE at the hnurly rate. This brinss the total cast of the fee t9 $4 "fhere are a couple of points to noie about the curreni opcraiion: •Even though a full Perrnit. Specialist tivas originally dedicated to RO'Al perniittino, in practice that position spends £0% of the time. on other developinent permits. ROW permits are processed oilce aweek, the equivalent of .2 PTF. • The City has ane Construction Inspector dcclicated to pavement cut i•equests. In the past, the posicion has been partially divcried to othcr sircct maintenance needs, such as floodine at intersections during heavy rain. The positiou inspects the site assaciated with permit reques#s; bu1 has not had the time to proaciively enfqrce the standards. This would entail periodically inspecting to ensure paveiilent cuts are nat be.ing macie without permission. Staffestimates that the, total volume of aciual pavement cuts could be more chan hwice the permit voluule; aiid are '`~continuing co evaluate tlvs situaiion. Pavement Cut Proposed Yolicy - lnitial AnAlysis of Tmplementation and Fnforcemetik, contiuucd April 26, 2005 Page 2 of 3 Current I'rogram Data i 1\jo. FTE No. Permit Fec A.nnual Permits/I'ear ltevenues Curretit S'V Prograni 12 1,200 $41 $49,200 The direct salary cost of the 1.2 FT'E cames to about $66,000 per ycar. The fee would need to be set at about $55 to fully recover those costs. Tliat fee lcvel would noc be high enough to support otlier onooing arid capital prograsn costs. Estimute of.9ctuu1l'avemenr Cut Volun2e As we began comparing our ROVd penlut activity ia that af Spokane County and the City of Spokane, we noted that our activity was abnormally low in comparison. The Ciry of Spokaue estunates about a 7,300 per year pcrmit volume, and an annual RO« permit revenue of $300,000 - $420,000. Spokane Valley's esiimated perniits are only about 16.4% of Spokane's, when one would expect it to be about 40% based upon our relative size. We're gattiering additional infonnation to detcrminc if thcre are other mitigating factors. However, using the 40% as a gauje, Spolcane V alley's actual Pavement cut activiry may be cJoser to 3,000. Impact of .Pi•onnscd Pctilicv T'he proposcd policy is morc data intcnsive to adininister. Stafr estimates an additional three statf'positial:s ar-. needcd tormplemetrt t;us policy: • One additioilal Permit Specialist • One additional Constructiozi t.nspector e Une position, classif cation to be detennulEd, to manage Che associated database Compur•ison of Staffinf; We are still co.mpiluig and clarifyitig information from Spokaue CounCy and the City of Sppkane to make sure we have true cotnparisons. However, Spokanc County llas 5-7 FTE for ROVV perinittung and inspection, and the City of Spokane has 6-7 kTE. These compare to Spokane Valley's 12 E'TF. Both the City of Spol:ane and Spokane County have said they don't anticipate adduig additional staff in order to impleinent the proposed policy. .i Favement Cut Propascd F'olicy -IIIICIAI Al1Alysis of Imp lemcntation and E nt'orccment, cuntinued ,April 26, ZUUj P:ige 3 of 3 ~ Dct1a MUnugement Spol:ane County and the City of Spol:ane both havc: pavcYnent cut databases; while. Spol:ane Valley does not. We do liave an exist:in= a3reement ~~~ith Spokane Countti~ for adaptation and use of some of their oihci• systFms, such as the PLUS permittiilG s_ystem. ~Ale may ve able t.o pursue a similar agreement far the pavemeni cut datahase, but don't vct l;nov., if thai's possible. That will help us [o clete.rrnine the 1ype 4f'pasition we. would need to maintain the data associated «7it1i pavement cuts in the CitY. L:stimate of Cost Spol:aue Vallcy NC►. FTF Nu. ~ Per•mit Fee Annu.il Progr.im FerraitslYcar fievenues Curreni 1.2 1.200 SA1 S49.200 Usino Pro osed f'olicy 4.2 a 3,000 ~A1 s 123,000 The direct salary cost of the 42 F7'E. conles to about $236;000 per ycar -ai1 increased cost of about $170,000 from the t.unent staffing leveL 7"he fee would need to be set at about S$U to fully Y•ecover those costs, assumin~ a a;C►OC1 per year perniit activi[y V41u111P. That fee ievel would iiot b° hicll enouQh to support other program co$ts, including staY-t up costs sucli as the creacion ar lease of a database. ~ $caff has a sigiuficant amount of additional ii-Li`oiination to gatlier and io analyze before cominD ta a more completc reconunendation. However; the tPu•ee 1°'I'E is a realistic estunate based upon what we l;now ai ihis time. S~ ;00OValley 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhallLzspokaneva(ley.org Memorandum To: city council From: Car}° P. llriskeU, Deputy City Attonley CC: Dave Ivlercier, City Manager :Uxte: Apri126, 2005 Re: Blasting issues StaEf PrESented infonnation to the Council in Fcbruary; 2005 about wliether the CiCy could amend its noise regulations pertauvng to blasting to preclude blasting on weekends. The Cnuncil asked staff to contaci potentially affccted entities to find out any impacts the Council should considcr that staff may not have. thought of. The letter that went out ide.niities ihat our Council wa.s considering prohibitina blasting on wee.kends, and that the Cit), wanied to find out from interested parties whether thEy wanted to conunent on t.hat suggcstiori, zuid identiCed that comments should be. submitied by March 25. A capy of one of the letters is attachecl for your review. Tliere are three entities ttiat do blasting in this area_ I scnt letters to the nvo that have their business located in the Spokane region; NO&N Construction and Nor[hwesl Rock Contractors. T also sent a]ette.r co Blasting and Vibration Consultants, located 'u1 the . Cheney area, which docs not do blasting, but which 1 believe does do monitoring of blasts. 1 sent a letter to attorney Brian McGinn, who represents Spokane R.ock Products. SR]? contraccs with a blastina firm frQm Lewistan, Idaho, which also cloes the blasting for Central PreMia. I called Mr. A1cGinn prior to the letier to advise him it was coming; and Iie indicated hc would advise. R.ock Products and the blasting eflmpany from Lewiston. 1 spoke with Mr. McGinn on .April 12; and he siated he had tall:ed to hoth Rock Products and the blasting company twiee about the opporCUnit), to cotrunecit. A copy of the letter wa.s sent to Mark r'lguirre,, Taepartment of Labor and lndustries, Region 6: wlio is the State's authority to authoriire and oversee bla.sting in this area. A copy was sent to the Spokane I-Iomebuilders, asking that they pass it on to their constituents. Thc otily comments I got back were verbal. One was from Norlhwe.sf Rock Contractors, • which said that thcy do not think it is real]y as issue because there is so littlc blasting that occurs in Spokane VaUey due to most of the area being river bed. '1\71r. McCTinn said that L_~ he did nat get any response from his clients, but that hE was only aNvare of four blasting events by Rock Products in the past twwo ysars, so yuestioned why the amendment wrould ~ be needed. ~ Building Official Tom Scholtens advised me that die issue is not really about noise ui blasting. Instead; it is the th.reat of vibration doing damage to buildines in the vicinity. lf thdi is the case, then amendina the noise ordinance is not the appropriate velvcle to address thc issue of blasting. The day of the week simply woulcl not bc rclevant. Additionally; 'Mr. Scholtens advised me that Rack Products had received same complaints about vibration resulting from blastina causing building damagc, so is now placing seismographs at blascing events to dacument that the amount of vibration does not Eaceed the. State lcvels. If you would like additional information on this maiter; plcase let me l:now. Caty P. Driskell Deputy City Attorney _ . , i ~ ~ 1~ Si.kane ~ ,;ooOValley 11767 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spo4(ane Valley WA 99206 509.421.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhallGspokanevallcy.org March 4, 2005 Government Affairs Director Spokane Home Builders Association 5813 East 4`h Avenue. Spokane. Valley, Vl%A 99212 Re: Consideratian by City Council ofpoteritial c7aanges to bla.rtirrg regulutions Tae.a.r SpokanE Homebuilders: Please be advised that the. Spokane Valley Cit); Council is P-oing to discuss thc possibility of amending iu reQulations relating to bla.sting. At the last Council iouch on this matter; I informed the Council that Iwould send letters to poientially affected entities to try to develop some pros and cons to a.mending the regulations. I am plan.ni.ng to present the responses I~ei froin inte.re.sted parties to the Council on .4pril 12 at the Study Session. C) The only chajige chat has been discussPd far possible adoprion would be to preclude blasting on vveekends. If this chanee werl- to be made; it wou]d likel}° unpaci sonie businesses and developers that blast to remoN~e rock from buildine sitcs. lf }Tou have any input on how this potential amendrnent would impact your constituene_y; please provide w7irien comments no lazer than March 25, 2005. Sunilarly, please pass this notice an to your constitue.nts as well. 7 would also encourage yau to come and listen on April 12, 2005, 6:00 p.m. There will be no opporttanity for conunent at a Study Session, but if it moves fortivard, there would b- comment on the record at the Regular Meeting in which it is discussEd. If }rou have any questians or comments, please let me l:.now. Very truly ~ , • Gtr ' Cary'P. Driskell Deputy City Attorney CPD/pd 9 SI"~l~ne C ,;wOValley 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhallClspokanevalley.or, Memorandum To: Dave Mercier, City Manager, Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager From: Mike Jackson, Parks & Recreation Director / Date: April 19, 2005 Re: Update on Splashdown 1°his mE.mo is intended to provide an updatc on the curreni status of tie Splastidown lease. As a yuick refreslier; thc City receives payment From Splashdown widcr twa separate leases. The first lease is strictly for the parking lot. on the soulh side of Alission Ave. for $2,000 per year. 'I'he se.cond is for the main lease which is calculated at 10% af gross revenue up to $300,000 and a% caF gross revenue in excess of $300,000. Concessions fees are based on 15% of gross concession receipts. Total comhined receipts for the past S ycars averaged $30,11 1.00 per year. ~ Representatives fram Splashdowm appeared before Cit), Coiulcil in 200a lo rresent their ideas for C-1 expansion. At that time, Council voted tuianimously to instruct the City Manager to procecd with negotiations on a lease that would include the expansion of Splashdown. Howcvcr, due [o financing problems, that project dicl not develop. In November; 2004; the new ovvner/operators; Geoff aiid Mclissa Kellogg requested permission to install a new "Cruuionball" slidc. Based on previous eouncil action, this recJuesi was aPproved by staff in Decembcr; 2004. The Kellogg's also requested that the chain link fence separating the soRball f elds fram SplashdoAm be rnoved to the South by twca feet. This will allow additional room t'or a needed sidewalk to access the new slide. 13a.sic softball field standards recommend 25` to 30' betwcen the fbul line and the SplashdoAqi fence. MUVing the fence will not infringe on that standard. Ylease note that the existing design of the sofibal] £clds nexc to Spla.shdown is riot an idcal sihiation. Faul balls from the softball field go over the fence inlo Splashdomi aiid are difficult io recover. Moving the fence 2 feet closcr to ttic sofibaU tields should not sigtuficantly compound the prohlem. In approving the adciition of the new slide, staff also rcitcratEd to Splashdovvn that pari:ing could be a future concern. Alth4ugh Splashciotim leases the parking lot on the south side nf Mission Ave., it is seldom used. Froui a practical standpoint, it is difficult to require Splashdowm patrons to park across the sfreet when the Valley Mission parking lot is not Full. However, future park development. coupled with population gr4wth could resull in additional attendaiice to Valley Mission F'ark. [f this occurs, onsite parl:ing could be problem. '1'his may cause SplashclolAm to use the parking lot aeross the screet (tlle intcnded purposc of the parking lot) or seek alternativc arraugements with the C:ity. (Next page please) lhe Kr;lloss's are worl:ine wilh t:he City Planners to gain construction 3pproval for their projcct. T'hey hope to have the new slide fully operatianal when lhcy opcn this sumn•ier. lt is my undErstanding that thc 1-lcalth Depar[cnent is curcently reviewing the Plans. If you would like additional inforniation or have any questions, please let me knpw. ~ i ~ ~ r~..±T~.= =Z~ ~ :.-.'•.~_G_~ ~C~3: :~:~"'._.~~...~..e..~._.~~_~...r~•,~..~~.'~'-..: _.r-...~.~~~~.7 ~ w I ' I' FaMiIV ' eI' ~IStlwu O: D~ ~ The a 4 BI EKTREME ~ BOVJL TUBING 7[CHHDLDGVTIl i ' i de i iw ~ l, . , ,a r , •h'., ti'.E (~V •i ~ . • , t • •h' ~ ~r SU2E[/RY : tEM:sss9 FRONT ~ ~ . . . _ _ . . . _ -rr ~t~: '{c:- ~ • - ~ r' ~ ~ . i7, _•4 . • ~y - ~ ~ f _'~i.x~C'~.. :&''.'-if:~` . • , ~ " " 3D PEASPECTIVE DESIGN OATA , . w~ m~~rca, ar,o~,aowt oLUaopvTH mrF~.~•~ca.srl arEntat muo¢ r 1 SplasMtownFomif Wal i1c iti• Uw+anIXrA1 ',1 •.R+' „ . ~ ~ PTIOrIL.L VLCW ~~a6fWiw1n1~T'NG .~IIt~JSc11 ~ - . :r':. I . • y. e.4..r.. .~1 , • • VO FIDF ~I1ML G,h1L!.:~.i ~ m m N .w. o...,~•r.~..,,.m.~. ' V - W . A S`pokw.a.ne Q ,;OOValley 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhallOspokanevalley.org Memorandum To: Dave Mercier, City Manager and Nina Regor, Deputy C2y Manager From: Mike Jackson, Parks 8 Recreation Director /I Date: April 20, 2005 Re: Filot project-Ciry/Couot>> Joint facility u5c Ftec:ently, Doug Chase (Spokane County Parks Director) and I tourcd various City and County facilities aiid discussed tlie potential of facility sharing. We identif:ieci a"piloc" prajecl for joint. facility use. In this scenario; the County wotild utilize the City-owued softball fields for softball leagues. In exchangez lhe City would use Camp Caro for oiu stunmer recreation programs aj1d otlier county picnic shelters, etc. as the need arises. I'his is propased as a"no cost" exchangc o1' facilitics ttse. ~ °1°here are four softball fields in the City (Brown's, Terrace View, Valley Mission, and EcigeeliFt' parks). The County has requested use of tlie fields for summer and fall softball leaeues. T1ie Park_s and Recrealion IaeParlment would requcst use of Camp Caro for basically the sacne "scason." In Resolution 04-011, the City Council adopted a fee of $25 for ihe fir5t hour and $15 for each aciciitianal hour. 'I'hc Coiuity fee structtire for Camp Caro is $150 per da}° for adult use and $50 per day for npn-Prbrit youth. 7fie fees indicated abovc provide a rough gauge of the value. Please note, the f eld maintenance is a provision of the Senske c:ontracl ancl therefore, is a fixed cast regardless of the use. "I'here is some lost opporttinity to tbe citizens of aur Cicy for informal use of the fields. However, the county softball program does serve our Cit}, of Spokane Valley Cifiiens. In 2003 and 2004, the City allowed use of the felds at no charge and the County performecl their own cuaintenarice, separate from the City cUnUacl. 1 am proposing that we dcvelop a simple letter of aEreement for the excliaiige of the above tu'o facilities for the 2005 season. We c:an track the use, problems, bencfits, etc. ancl review at the end of the season. ~ Please let me know what you think. 1 SpWwa-ne a Va11.e y 11707 E Sprague Ave Suitc 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org Memorandum Date: April 19, 2005 To: Dave Mercier, City Manager From: Neil Kersten, Public Works Director Re: Bid resutts on County Sewer Project at Sherwood Forest, Mica Park 8 Johnston Last fall after the ballot issue, we received com.ments from contractors rcgarding the e?:tra cost to pave the remaining portion of the streets. As a result of those comments; we reviewed the original methadolog}° developcd by the Cqunty aiid the City's interlln team and proposed that it would be more appropriate to bid the additinnal paving as an alcernate. At our request; Spokane Couaty included in the bid proposal a base bicl schedule for trenching a.nd patching and an alternative bicl schedule for Pull-width paving of wide streets. "1 hc purpose for this approach was to compare the contractor's additional cost for full-width paving to the method Spokane Counit), uses to estima[e ihcse additional costs. Shenvnod Horest, Mica I'ark alid Johnston have roads that are wider than the width of the trcnches necessary to install the sewer pipes. Based on the bids received, the additional cost to provide full width pavuig for Sherwood Forest and Mica Park is $205,167.31. T}pically on sewer prajects, there are sections of pavement (called "gaps") tiiat do noi get removed or replaced because there-are_ no pipes or manholes placed in these area;. On previous prnjects we have paid the additional cost to repave these "gap" areas sa we end up with a completely new road surface. An additional $45,728 is estimated to pave the "gaps" in the Sherwood Forest, Mica Park, and Johnston areas. Therefore, the total additional cost for full-width paving with no gaps in Sherxvooci Forest; Mica Park, and Johnston rather than trenching and patching is $250,896.30. The original estimate for full-width paving is these two areas using the cowlty's previous esthiiating methods is approxiiziately $515,850. A sigiuficant reduction is realireeci by allowing the contractors to bid the difference in their cosl bcriiTeen trenchinglpatching antl full-width reulovallreplacement rathcr thui using the county's estimating methods. As a result of noi doing full width paving iuider the method used in prcvious years, the cost tn the County for trenclung and patching is an additional $264,954 wiuch results from the additional cost of worl:ing around the pavement cuts areas. ~ ~ J Spokane County Librar}' District ~ Spokane Valley Library Services and Distzact Support Report to the Ciiy of Spokane Valley March 2005 LiBRARY SERVICES Cust•oiner use measures, District-wide Jusl as last year when libraiy use got oEf to a slo", start compared tca ths yeai• before hul- then bega.n lo pick up, we're seeing the same foi• 2005. For tl»•ee nlajdr measures nE use-circu]ahon, library visi.t's, and sQftti-are station baol:ings (prEviously called InternEt bookings) - the year-td-date deci•eases ai•e Iower unvlarch th7n in January and February. In fact, saftware statiCn bookings are nqw even Wi kh M1rch 2004. P.efcrcnce use, prograrn attcndanee, and meeting room boakings started out in the positive column anci contulue in that modc, with }°car-to-date increascs of 11J%,11%, and 29°r6 respectively. Holds placement and database use aLso continue to shotiv strong increases ovcr 2004. Use Cf self-checkaut remauls fairly cansistent within branches, but thcre are wide variadQns between them. For example, at Airwa}r I-Ieights it's avcrag-ing 54U/o Of tOtc11 Cll'CL11e1t1C~ll wIllle at DCET' P1l'k, it's 23%. Vallej, hover.s arou.ncl 40% and Noi-th Spokane is usual.ly hig•her-up to 50%. Those ,vho usc it, love it. Ot~er t-he past several ~nonths most o( the u.nsolicited coi~~.~~ents :I've received about our services w}ien oul i.n hlie communit), are about being able to place holds online from home, receiving e-mail notificaMan wlien they're available, and then quickly running i.n to the library for self-scrve pickup and checkout Customer use measures, Greater Spolcane Valley Except for thE reference area, liUrary use in the Spolcarie Valle), conhnues to generally reflect tliat of the Distriet as a whale. In reference, howevcr, numUers are much lawEy. Pr4gram attendanc,e, while d.own compared to last year at Ai•gonne and Ot-is Orchaxds, is substantially up at Valley. Selected Mar.ch 2005 Statistics Circulation Daar caunt Reference T'rogram 5ofttivare Stalion In uiries Attendance Bookin s YTf~ YTI) to YTi~ YI'D to 1'7'U 1'fD to Y"I'1~ YI'D ta 1'I'D 1'TD to 2005 2004 2005 2004 2005 2004 2005 2004 2005 2004 Total SCLD 454,373 - 3.7 % 227,085 - 0.6% 70,803 + 11.7% 12,1150 + 77 .(1 46,267 + p.^ M Valley 123,130 - 9.6%i 63,628 -1.1°lu 16,852 -17.4`Yo 2,61'I T 25.6% 7_4,571 - 6.1 So r1r onne 29,569 - 6.03'0 19,352 -1.9% 2,942 - 7.1.A`Yo 390 -191 % 3,804 +71.8% Oris 22,984 -10.0'36 11,227 -1.7% 1,878 - 42% 227 - 43.5% 2,035 -1.2 io Subtotal 175,683 -9.0p 94,207 -1.3°,b 21,612 -15.6% 3,22$ j 70.7% 20,410 - 2.7% SCLD 35.7°0 .4.1.5°,r 30.50/o 25.9% 44.1% I~ J 1'age 1 of 6 March Registered Customers by Branch of Registration 2005 Total % af SCLTa YTD Change '%i Aditlt Yauth ~ - ! from 2004 Total 102,869 - 51 % 74% 26 % sCLu Valle y 34,799 33.8% -6.9M 76% 24% Argonne 9,294 9.0% - 7A"i6 76gb 24% OHs 5,4315.3Sb -13.7i6 66°0 34Io Subtotal 49,52~ At branchES serving Spalcane Valley residents... Su.mmary (Ellen Miller, re.gionai mnnuger): Ivlarch was an active progranzrni.ng month as we continue to leaxn marc about how to implement adtilt progranu-what works az-id what doesn't. Wc also were quite busy wit}i plans for the re-carpcting oE Argonne, dressing up VallEy meeri.ng rAOm space to inake it mo.r.e cluld friendly, and evaluating and ordei-ing display units to better market our library matcrials ici the branches. TEZere was a degree of strFSS as we waited for the bid results far the new Moran Prair:ie Library, which calne in wonderFully at the end oF the rnonth allowi.ng us to i.nclude severa] of our "add alternates." V1le also eqntuluEd the t-reiid oE nlare unusual customer behavior issues at- all of aur bxanches than is nornial for tlvs tim.e o( year. It is tinzes li.ke tlus that it is very obvious that wc are a"public" librar}' and that peopl.e i.n our conununity may be expericneing mare si~ress u1 thcir lives tl1an usual. Information services/Adult serviccs (Karen Byrne, regiortal stepervisor): Adult programs took the fore this month. March 5was d1e History of tlle Spokane Va.l.ley wluch was done col.(aborltively with tlle Spokane Vallcy Herirage Museum and included SCLT7 directar Mike Wirt ti+ith a histoi-y of Spoka.ne VaIley library services to 1970 a.nd Jane Singleton and Clark Baulbridge with vtifaets hom the Lnuseum and in.Eormation about its founding and growth; TEa and NIysteries went on the road this rnonth in three TZegi4n II libraries, i.ncluciing about 50 mysteries over 50 years; Vallcy was visited by az1 F-ngLish as a Second L,anguape group from SCC, the students using Chinese, Russian, Span.ish and Vietnamese as their first languagc; the only Region II information literlcy class this month was schedu]ed for Otis Orchards but cancelled when no one registered. Youth Services (1V1ury EITen Bruks, rcgionnl sripe-rvisar): Several staFf attended the "Fast and Fabulous Fla.nnels" workshop and canle away with many new ideas and a flaniiel stoi-y to use in StoryEiines; in the Spring Ivfakc-n-Take, ducks werc created to decorate the child_r.en's areas and the meeting rooms; work cantinued on the tEEn nan-fiction project z-ind ehildren's f icl-ion arcas wer.e weeded; work prog'ressed on the Iloor plan for the ch.ildren's and tcen areas, informadon desk, and computer stations for the upcaming Argonne renovaHon. Valley (E11ot Miiler, re.gionczl inratrager): The carpet ii-iset for the Valley meeking room Storytime area ivas selccted and new lighting was installcd to brighten khat corncr of the rooM the Friends of the Libi•ary hid Easter }-ggs u1 the basement area far the sraff to fimd; acrylic display units were oi•del•ed for the slot-wall end panels for the display of liUrary materia]s-which in tu»-i spurred the check out nf items placed on then,. Argoi7ne (Jirdy Lrrck, brctnch srrpervrsor): As noted elsevvherc in this report, severa] slaff workcd on plarui.i.ng for various aspects of the renavation project; library programs included. "Green Tea & Mysteries;' an After 5chool Special, and well-attended Storytimes, with lots of new f.aces; the displa}= Page 2 of 6 case featured a japanese collection and the display rack zuiti taUle held a col.lection of baolcs by Gel Lit! authors; sevEral people attendPd the Friends reorganization meeNng at the enci oE March, ~ J designed to breathe neiv life int4 the siTial1 group lhat has hcen part of Arg•on.ne for rnany ycau-s. Otis Orclcur(ls (Bez) f3ergstro»i, brarich srperuisor): The stheduled lobb}, display exhihikor did not shaw up so Bev jumpcd at ayoung gu-1's ofEer to displayPokenlons-which proved ta be a populax display; a customer gave enthusiasdc thanks to staff fnr finding some long aut-of-touch relatives on the Reference USA dal•abase; a leather roclcer reclinr• r arrived fQr the Sta.Ef room. Orrtreaclr (Annette Eherlein, suuervisor): QZild Care Packet niaterials were updated and staff ve tirorku-ig with Collection Services to delermine an effieient mcthod of b1r coding the i.ndividual itcros in the packets while still bei.ng able lo check out the paeket ~~,hcn d-iere 1re missi.ng item.s; staff arc hying out a"Visidng 13ook" Eor r.esidenis with Alzheimcr's-a callection oF poems and pictures to encow•age 1•eine►nberi,iS events in their life ancl pravidc a meaningful interacl7on througlt books- and finding it lo be successful; plancting is underway ta use the noi7nai Uislrict rzm.inder and overdue process fa• Outreach customers; at Nlission Ridge P.etirement Home, lhe Book Cluh Ladics are ctu-rentl3, enjoying the book Llririer tlw Cloc1:: the Stonj of the Crescenf Depnrtrnent StorP and since somc of thcm worked at the store, dley have boxes o( Crescent memorabilia they are sharvzg with each other. Friends of the L-ibraiy: greatcr SpplcanE Valley Va1le7: 17he Friends arc very busy planning Eor their first Liaok sale to be heIct in Apri1 for which lhey're getting many donations and lats af unterest. They will also Ue selling popcc,m arzd caiid), at the ivYovie Nightin April. Argonne: The "new" Friends group that nlet un late *Marcli rnade plans to mect wcekly for the next ` lhree months. They'rc already valuntECring foi• assigiinlenhs such as plannulg for a Boak'n Bake Sale in June, and tliey're lnoking inio sella.ng some donated baoks on eBay. Friends of the Library: other District Nnrtli Spokane: The \zorth Spc►kane Priends had a ver}, successfu.l book sa].e, nEttulg over $3000 in direct salES and d4nations, and have recom.milted to thc Children and Teen a.rea enhancement project with new enthusiasm. O • Library materials ■ Uuring March we added 8,885 nEw items to tlie database. This nurnber beat lask year's best month by more than 600 ilerns, and makes N1ard12005 the second-highest month uz our histnry for collectic~n adclitions. ■ 1'outh servicts coardinator Thom Barthelmess focused on purchasing Uoard books ancl easy readers in addition to i•egular materials. Lyn worked on severaJ ARoran Prairie subject areas and pur in nvo very large retrospecdve auctiabook orders. ■ Publishuzg trends Lyn is noticing are sigrtificant increases nn publishing in "Chick Lit;" Ramance/HQrror crossovers (ROHd), and lNorld War II Uoaks, both memoirs and histaries. Another trend is si.mult•aneou5 publishing of nniltiple formats (regular print, large pruit, and . audiobooks) of rnany popular or high profile authors. ! \1 1'age3of6 I'rogramming ■ Work continued on Su.mmer Ctead'u1g pragram plannutg (in cAOrdinadon wikh SpokanE Publ.ic - Library) as well as on integ►'ati.ng Early Literacy Skills into starytune. "I'honl has requested postcrs higlll.ighting the C.~ skills for early literacy to put ui Uranch storytiine areas. ■ 7`hon1 wrorked with Ann and Beth on the ".FAr the Love of Movies" series, i.ncluding ironing out• contractual issucs, and getting posters and flyers ko branches. Iriterlibrary loan We borrowecl 346 iteins far ou.r customers and lent 325 items to vther libraries. We learned this month that the report that generatcs these statistics has bee.n producing inflaled numUers, so we haven't been lending as much as we thought. Spreadsheets will Uc carrected back to 2004 so that thexe are accurate nunibcrs for comparison purposes. Technical Services We agreed to catalag necv Books in Motion til•les each month (10-12 pcr nwnth) i.n excllange for free cnpies of the audiobooks. They're replacing, at na cost, the covers of all our older copies af thcir products with nerv covers d-iat aze much more attractive and should appeal to customers. Other • Thom worked with staff on a new floor plan !or the yauth area at A.rgonne. HE, also arranged the Make Tal:e that produced parachuting duck decorations for the branches. ■ The Get Lit booklist was completed for prultuig and disLTibvtulg. AD • New Moran Pxairie Library New plans and speeificatians were. made available to contractors an March 7, the pre-bid confcrence `vas held on the 22nd, and bids tivere opened on the 29th. Forturately, bids fell within the budget and the $1,459,000 (plus sales tax) constr-ucdon contract was awarded to Shawn Cole Conskruction at a March 31 special Board ef Trustces meeting! The g-roundbreaking is planned far April 1.6 at 11:00 a.m., with refreshmEnYs to be provided by the Moran Prairie Friends oF the Library. Moran Prairie annexation mitigation agreement - 4Ve worl:ed with the Cily of Spokaxle and 5pokane Public Library on the payment process that's part of the Moran Prairie annexation mitigatian agreement_ lh requires that SCLD be paid an amount equal to what wauld have becn collected in property taxes from all areas annexed in the futu_re, unl-il 90°w of the urban growkh area has been annexed. This means that the assessecl valuatian of each ar►nexed ar.ea must bc, calculated cach year, in coordinatian with the Bou.ndary Review Boarci staff and the CoLinly Assessor's Office using Spokane Couiitv GIS mapping. 2005 Legislative Session Several cutoffs during the month vvhittled away at the number of bills u.nder considcration by the Legislature. The few bills opposed by the library community died in the firstcutoff, as well as all of the puUlic works and Uidding bills and several of the public disclosure bills. B}' the e.nd of the month,,: khe Washingt'on T ibrary Association's Uiggest effort, a mulLi-year levy lid override bill, didn't• make ii oul of the I Iouse and died. l lowever, the bill adding public libraries to tlze list nf agencies to be noLiFied of sex offender rele3scs was easily makuig its way through the legislative process. Weekly Page 4 of 6 Legislat7ve Plaiuung Cammittee conference calls were suspended pcnding the emergence of any new issues dlat nced to be addressed. City oE Spolcane Valley annexation to SCLD The Spokane Valle}, Cit-y Coluzcil unani.mously appraved Ordi-nance No. 05-011, requesking annexation ro SCT D, at its Marcli $ regular meeting. The SCL,D Boarci unanimously conCUrred evitlt the annexation request at its Ivlarch 15 ineeting, and the Board Qf County CoinntissionErs placed tIle issue on the May 17 special elecdan Uallat by resolution an March 2?. An annexation fact sheet was madF 3vailable i.n greater Spokane Valley libraries and at the Spokane Valley Chamber of Coirunerce office after the SCLD Boarcl's conCUrrence. At the request• of the Counq- Auciitor a»d Count}, E1c:eHons Of(ice, Vallcy Library will serve as the single bailot drop off location fnr the mail only election, with normal polling plaee hours af 7:00 a.n1. to 8:00 p.111. Ymrestnient banking services 13ond counsel Roy Koe~en is assisting ~vitli the solicitatian of proposals for in~~cstment banking serviees and selection of a fum to suppl3, those serviees to the Disti-ict for at least the next three Ycars. The priulzry use xvill. be Eor short ternl dcUt financing, either the usu.al tax aiiticipation notcs ar an altcrnate if there's one that appears feasible. The proposal ]etter will be senl• lo polential vendors early in April Eor an early Ma}' reviPw of proposals and selectibn of a shorl list for intcrviews. We're hargeting carly June for ous selection. Misccllaneous • At the end of the manth, the checkout liinit for regular custo;ners Avas increased to 50 and the holds li.m.it to 25. ~=J■ Eleckions Office staff checked out the Deer Park meeting ro4in as a potential polling site beginning in September. ■ The fi.nal tall}; for materiaLs damaged by a water pipe break at Cit), Parcel's warehouse a cou}.~le of months ago is $5,115.06. We'll be reinlbursed for the loss. • • O In lvlarch Iviil:c 4Yirt aLtended the Regional Chamber af Conunerce breal:fast "State of the County" address; the Spokane Valley ChamUer of Com.merce breakfast; the Spokane Valley 13usi.ness Fair; part of SpAkane Public Libra.ry's staff da}; the Region ll all-stafE meeting; a Spokane Is Reading conunittee meeting; and a l3oard of County CqIIUTiissioncrs meeti.ng. • Washington Library Association Conference The 2005 jNLA confcrcnce cornmitteQ held its 11st plaruv_ng rneeting- before the Annual Con.ference that will be held April 20-23 u1 Spokane. Satne af us at SCLD have been working on il for about tiwo years and others for so.mewhat less tiine, Uut whatever the case, we're looking forward to hosting our colleagues fram around the state. SCLD staff having majoi• i•oles 7rc Ellen Miller (Registrar); l'riscilla Ice (Treastu•er); Betli Gillespie (Conunwucations);Krisly Batenlan (Equipmenl-); a.nd Kandy Brandt (Specill Events). Trustee Claudia Parkins is Prograni Chair ar►d I'm Confererlce Coordinator. ~ OMMUNICATIO (BE7H GILLESPIE, • • CoardulatEd and staf(ed the Valley Business Fai.r display. ■ Wrate the first draEt of the 5CLD 2004 an.nual report. Page 5 of 6 • Began coorciinating the Moran Prairie grounclbreaking event. • Helped coordinate drafting and production of an arutexation Eact sheek that's available to customers in branches and pasted on Web. • Created sllot list far photo stoCk for tl-ie new Web sitc. • VdLA conference activities ulcluded, drafting signage and ticket copy; finalizing progr;.~m di-aft and sending il the to pi-inter; continuing to coordinahe contents for regish•ation packet, includ'uzg WLA serviccs sw-vey and loca] uifornlation; eciiting and producing brochure for WLA Awarcis Lunehcon. HUMAN • R ■ Widi regional managers, m.et with slaff pf SCC's Trauling 8: Eciueatian Coordinatuzg CEnter to discuss developing a cnentoring pi•og•am far aur managers and supervisors. This will be ti t-%a,o part trai.ning session conducted in thc fall. • 5cheduled Dr. Paul Davis ta provide trainang on Deal,ing with the Mentally 11.1 Customer as parl• of tl-ie Apri129 managers and supervisors trauling. • Completed r.ev.isions to the District's personnel policies, presented them to thc Board for final consideration, and began the process of revising the personnel procedu.res. • Attended tl-ie Vlarch WCIF (Washington Counties f_nsurance Fu.nd) meeting. 1'he 1tilCIP/1NCIF Boards voted to add the AfF0URdable Plan ta retiree coverage and also discussecl adding ohesity coverage and bar.iatric su1•gei•y in 2006 ta the WCIP Plans. • Staff Day Com.m.ihtee inet and decided nn the theme "gEncrationnal cliversity." Tables will be deearated usi,ng• the inusiC, dh•ess, icmd literature of thc 40's, 50's, 60`s, 70's, 80's, a.nd 90's. A hula hoop cAnt•esh is plaiuled for tl-ie lunch hour. INFORMATION • • ' ■ F'resented a"tour" af the nEw Wcb site to the Board on M:arch 15. ■ bVorlced on the skatistics reporting sheets to ti•ack new measures for the Strategic Plan. ■ Completed staff loaner la}.~top dcplaymcnts, with admulistraHon, each region and IT having qne for sha.red use, along with LCD projectors in adnvnist-raHon and region. ■ Replaced older pru,ters at variaus staff locations; completed HVAC replaccment PC setups; upgraded memory on Public and domain cantrollers in computer raom; and decided on the specifications and oracrec150 more De.ll computers to replace cahalog PCs. • To prepare l•o upg•rade Unicorn 1Alorkflows, installed Windaws Scrver 2003 on Unicorn Test to match the productian emriranment and instal.led the ne-tv version of Workflows. ■ jNorked with Qwest to plan for the hardwarE upgrades necessary for the nehvork upgrade and the ncw VoIP phone system we expect to install this year. • Friscil.la's imoolvement with `NLA heatecl up when she attenaed a finance cUninuttEe meetulg several days befdrE ballots were actually cou.nted. She got the oflicial word that she was the new associal•ion M-easurer a few days latcr. 04/14/(}5 mjw Page 6 of 6 % Spokane Valiey Planning Commission Approved Minutes Council Chambers - City Hall 11707 E. Sprague Ave March 24, 2005 CALL TO ORDER Planning Commission Chair Crosby called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Staff attending the meeting are Marina Sukup, Community Development Director, Gregory McCormick, Planning Manager; Mike Basinger, Associate Planner; and Sue Pearson, Deputy City Clerk. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Commission, audience, and staff recited the Pledge of Allegiance. III. ROLL CALL Fred Beaulac - Present Bill Gothmann - Present Bob Blum - Pressnt lan Roberkson - Present David Crosby - Present John G. Carroll - Present Gail Kogle - Present IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Commissioner Gothmann moved thaf the March 24, 2005 agenda be approved as presented. Commissioner Blum seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It rwas moved by Commissioner Beaulac seconded by Commissioner Gothmann that the minutes of the March 10, 2005 Planning Commission meeting be approved. Motion passed unanimously. VI. PUBLIC COMMENT There was no public comment. VII. COMMISSION REPORTS Commissioner Carroll stated he is working on the NAICS codes. VIII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS A. Developments Updates: Planning Manager McCormick gave updates on the following developments. Please sse his memo dated 312512005 for details. 1. REZ-23-041SU6-15-04 Ponderosa Estates North (formerly Broadmoor Estates North) 2. ZE-46A-90/SU6-05-05 Inverary 3. SUB-07-04/PUB-04-04 Ponderosa PUD 4. PE-1746-94 Mica View Estates PUD B. Comprehensive Plan Communitv Involvement Planning Manager McCormick explained the community involvement element and hearings for the comprehensive plan and presented the follawing tentative schedule of ineetings: tvtarch 24, 2005 Plannfng Commission Minutes Page 1 of 2 Tues, April 19, 2005, Joint meeting, Review of the land use map with Council Tues, May 17, 2005, Joint meeting, Overview and hearing of the draft comprehensive plan. Thurs, May 19, 2005, Open House in Council Chambers, 5:00 pm to 8:00 pm, to display materials and have handouts for the public. VWed, June 1, 2005, Open House in Council Chambers, 5:00 pm to 8:00 pm, to display materials and have handouts for the public. Mon, June 6, 2005, Request for map changes Thurs, June 16, 2005, Planning Commission public hearing on the comprehensive plan Thurs, June 23, 2005, Overview of comprehensive plan Tues, July 5, 2005, Council deliberate comprehensive plan Tues, Aug 16, 205, Joint Meeting, review of comprehensive plan. There was discussion on the process. Commissioner Gothmann observed that he felt that each individual homeowner that will be affected by the comprehensive plan should receive a letter explaining the changes. Planning McCormick explained the notification required by law is in newspapers and other public places like our website. IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS A. OLD BUSINESS: A. Uniform Development Code: Definitions and Matrix and Schedule of Permitted Uses Ms. Sukup introduced Associa4e Planner Michael Basinger, the planner working on developing maps for the comprehensive plan. .Planning Manager McCormick reviewed the contents and purpose of the maps the Planning Commission was encouraged to note questions and any errors. The draft maps are intended to assist the Commission in the review of the schedule of permitted uses and definitions. Commissioner Blum requested a copy of the maps for review. X. FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER Director Sukup reminded everyone of the following dates: Wed, April 13, 2005, City Council Conversation with the Community Thurs, April 14, 2005, Next Planning Commission meeting Tues, April 19, 2005, Joint meeting, Review of the land use map with Council XI. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p.rn. SUBMITTED: APPROVED: Sue Pearson, Deputy City Cleric David Crosby, Chairman ~ March 24, 2005 Planning Commission hAeeting Page 2 of 2 Sp~okane 00 O Valley ,;00* 11707 E Spraguc Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley VJA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityha(lC?spokanevalley.ors Memorandum To: David Mercier, City Manager, and Niembers of Council From: Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager Date: April 26, 2005 Re: Monthly Report - Summary of March 2005 Activities OperaEinns • Recraritments. Thea-e ai•e a number of vacani positions; as well as positions riewl}, authorized at the. Februar)r retreat. Following is the recruitmern status of each position as of the end of ARarch: POtilIl01?. .Stulrrs ~ Accountantl[3ud~et T}~e rec.ruitment for the new,l~~ authorized positioii elosed Mtir~eh 11, Analy_st_ and we're in the deliberation phasc. Administrative Assistant Conditional offers have been madc for t.he Community Development ~-J (3) and CenterPlace ndmin Assistants. [nterviews for the ilnater positioii wy will tal:e place later. Bui.ldinp,Inspector IT.(2~ ~Condit:iona] nffers .have been niade to t+.vo candidales. CencerPlace Coordinator Interviews have takcn place, and we're in the deliberation phase. Code A conditional nfferlias been madeto a candidate, Fnforcemenc Officcr . Development Engineer Interviews htive been conducted, and we're in the deliberation phaseV ~ Humau Resources Council cliseussed che position on vlarch 22, aricl siziff wiLl return at a Anttlvst later date itb adcli.tional infonnatian. Publie Infqrmation Council discussed thc position on March 22 ar►d also Un Apri! 5. lf the Officer resolution classifj,ing the new positioii iS annroved, staff will begin a rec.ruitntent. Recreation CoArdinfltnr A conditional oifer tias be.en made cci a candidate. Stonnwater Engineer Gloria 1UlAntz hegan %vorking for the City at the end of March. Storm~~~ater . Tnter<<iews were scheduled for April 4. En ineerin T'echnician - TraPf-ic Enqineer A conditional oFfer has been made to a eGuididate. ~ J Deputy City Vlanafier ll4onthly ReNort -119arcH 2005, cc:►ntinued April 26, 2005 !'age 2 of 2 .J Weh site Web .Sile Sttfttntury - Mon!!r o.f March 2005 Uni ue User Sessions 20:735 '1"o Five Ya =cti Viewed* Einplo ymcnt 4,025 GIS/Ivlaps 702 . Depa,rtments 571 Status of Positions 462 Council Agendas and iMinutes 413 To Five "Referrer" V1'eb Sitcs Spokane Countv - Jobs 463 S oka»e. County - Gov't Emplovment 382 S okane Valle Online 355 Munici al Kesearch and Services Ccnter QMR.SC 156 Easi Valley School 17istrict 113 *Nutc: n`umbers rcilect full or majority weel:s of the month. As a point of interest, che City's new iWyth or Fact page received 300 hits. . ~ ~ ~ c,h rt Ma.I1-e ;oOValley 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley VJA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhal4spokanevalley.org Memorandum To: Dave Mercier, City Manager From: Ken Thompson, Finance Director CC: Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager Date: April 8, 2005 Re: Monthly Re;nort lauring the month of March, Finance cmployees worked on thc follo~~q'n- projects: Office of manaaenient and budp~ei A-97 cost allocation plan We have receivcd five propasals from eompanie:s that preparc cost allncation plans. Our 2003 work plan inr.ludes securing a fcderally apgroved plan that allocates indirect costs to graiits and city operalions. 1'his process enables the cii}7 to be reiinbursecl for some of our cos[s. 13uclget variance/investmcnt reports 1Zeports shoNving a comparison qf (und reven«cs and eapenditures ta our 2005 budgei at March 31, 2005, are attached. Most January revenues and expenditures Zre accrueci into our Decernbcr accounting records to reflect the correci fiscal year an our fuiancial statements. Therefore, our ye.ar-to-date tramsactions are ciisiorted in the early months ofeach year. If revenues flowcd to tlie city in tv<<clve equal monthly installments and e.apendittires were disbursed cqually aver tweIVC moiithS, the percent realizecl column would reflect 25% at March 31. Ovcrall; reve.nues and expenditures are witliin Qur projections for 2005. The investment report ai March 31; 2005 is also attachect. J Accountant/buciyet analyst anci accotmting manaQer positions ; We intE.rviewEd a total of five caiididates for these two positions. Our pool of applicants was quite small cUmpareci to previous recruitmcnts. We are considcring various options itlclud'uig openulg new recruitments. E'xpansion of office space The Libert}j Mutual space (suite_ 104) has been secured. We have beeu told a sublease wiih First Pacific F'edcral (suitE 103) is being prepared which will givc the city another 1,000 square. feet. OLu- newly aequirecl stora€c spaee in an adjoining building is beino usecl for cicy records, snQw tires and all kinds of misc.ellaneous items. Budeet amendments Staff has prepared amendments to our 2005 budget which will be disc.ussetl at April and lvlay council meetings. A public hearing will be scheduled by the cit}, council to gather input f'rom the public. J ~ City of Spokane Valley General Fund Budget Variance Report For the Period March 31, 2005 Budget March YTD Unrealized Percent 2005 Revenues Revenues Revenue Realized General Fund Revenues: Property Tax S 10,055,316 $ 116,317 S 138,885 $ 9,916,431 1.38°ra 1 Sales Tax 13,000,000 1,039,169 2,526,467 10,473,533 19.43 Gambling Tax 800,000 30,522 30,522 769,478 3.52 4 Leasehold Excise Tax 5,000 128 728 4,272 54.56 Franchiss Fees/Business Licenses 650,000 4,156 14,347 635,653 2.21 4 Siate Shared Revenuss 1,121,709 157,120 157,586 964,123 14.05 Planning & Building Fees 1,263,000 162,265 542,483 720,517 42.95 14 Fines and Foifieitures 1,200,000 117,228 231,707 968,293 19.31 Rscreation Pragram Fees 170,000 2,210 38,570 131,430 22.69 Investment Iiiterest 36,000 10,030 24,123 19,877 67_01 Oaeraiing Transfers 207,140 - - 207,140 - 11 $ 28,508,165 S 1,639,685 $ 3,705,418 S 24,802,747 13.00% Budget Pllarch YTO Unrealized Percent ~ 2005 ExpenHitures Expenditures Expendiiures Realized C') General Fund Expenditures: Legislative 8ranch $ 288,226 $ 18,613 S 84,155 S 204,071 29.20% 10 Executive & Legislative Suppart 442,867 28,142 84,090 358,777 18.99 Public Safiefy 15,711,424 1,240,808 3,622,707 12,088,797 23.06 Operations 8 Administrative Svcs 1,027,601 64,796 172,656 854,945 16.80 Public VJorks 723,990 64,787 167,487 556,503 23.13 Planning & Community Dev. 1,630,565 117,567 311,078 1,319,487 19.08 Lihrary Services 2,270,000 - - 2,270,000 - 5 Parks 8 Recreation 1,932,186 121,819 250,200 1,681,986 12.95 General Government 4,481.306 42.548 316,870 4,164,436 7.07 16 $ 28,508,165 $ 1,699,080 S 5,009,243 S 23,498,922 17.57% i 4i1412005 2_41 Prn City of Spokane Valley Other Funds Budget Variance Report For the Period March 31, 2005 Budget March YTD Unrealized Percent 2005 Revenues Revenues Revenue Realized Other Funds Revenues: Streei Fund S 2,562,109 $ 95,377 S 212,392 $ 2,349,717 8.29°ti krterial Street Fund 566,465 42,700 92,748 473,717 16.37 Trails and Paths 5,100 18 47 5,053 0.92 HoteUMotel Fund 351,000 20,297 41,475 369,525 51.82 Debt Service - LTGO 03 582,835 - - 582,835 - 2 Capital Projects Fund 806,000 67,623 147,315 658,685 18.28 Special Capital ProJects Fund 806,000 66,907 145,260 660,740 18.02 Street Capital Projects 933,000 50,413 291,745 641,255 31.27 Mirabeau Point Project - 6,192 76,624 (76,624) - Street Sond Capiial Projects - 2,869 7,587 (7,587) - CD Slock Grant Fund - 20,50d 20,500 (20,500) - Capital Grants Fund 3,827,000 36,500 36,500 3,790,500 0.95 8 Barker Bridge ReconstruUion 234,000 - - 234,000 - 8 Stormwater A4gmt Fund 1,276,750 19,128 23,768 1,252,982 1.86 Equip. Rental & Replacement 145,305 329 582 144,723 0.40 11 Risk Management 134,450 53 105,029 29,421 78.12 6 $ 12,230,014 $ 428,906 S 1,201,572 S 11,028,442 9.82°Jo - , Budgef March YTD Unrealized Percent 2005 Expenditures Expenditures Expenditures Realized Other Funds Expenditures: Street Fund $ 3,318,066 S 173,155 $ 463,397 S 2,854,669 13.97% Arterial Sireet Fund 856,400 - - 858,400 - 7 Trails and Paths - - - - - FloteUMotel Fund 300,000 21,333 32,667 267,333 10.89 Debt Service LTGO 03 582,835 - - 5$2,835 - 2 Capital Projects Fund 332,545 - - 332,545 - 7 Special Capital Projects Fund 205,145 - - 205,145 - Street Capital Projects 933,000 33,006 65,242 867,758 6.99 8 PAirabeau Poini Project 3,000,000 32,000 1,069,553 1,830,447 35_65 8 Street Bond Capital Projects 406,000 36,500 36,500 369,500 8_99 8 CD Block Grant Fund - - - - - Capital Grants Fund 3,827,000 33,869 36,401 3,790,599 0.95 8 Barker Bridge Reoonstruciion 234,000 - - 234,000 - 8 Sformwater Mgmt Fund 1,312,521 21,005 30,357 1,282,164 2.31 Equip. Rental & Replacemnt 51,051 6,469 32,623 18,428 63.90 12 Risk Management 134,450 - 1104,887 29,563 78.01 6 $ 15,493,013 $ 357,357 $ 1,871,627 $ 13,621,386 12.08% . i 4114n005 z:a 1 PM City of Spokane Valley Investment Report For the Month March 2005 Total LGIP' F&A MM Investments Beginning $ 11,576,817.21 S 4,606,346.21 $ 16,183,163.42 Deposits 1,350,026.46 - 1, 350, 026.46 Withdrawls (1,075,000.00) - (1,075,000.00) Inierest 25,445.92 9,663.22 35,109.14 Ending $ 11,877,289.59 $ 4,616,009.43 $ 16,483,299.02 Balances bv Fund General Fund $ 3,749,470_85 Street Fund 2,663,774.85 Arterial Street 920,097.15 Paths & Trails 8,539.33 HotellMotel 165,877.81 Capital Projects 1,716,027.57 Spec. Capital Proj, 1,395,106.49 ~ Stree# Capital Proj. 928,333.71 ~ Mirabeau Point Proj. 2,793,985.90 Streef Bond Proj. 1,333,597.28 CD Block Grant Fd. 253,500.00 Stormwater fUlgm#. 1,192,390.63 Equipment Rental 147,522.26 Risk Management 25,155.19 $ 96,493,299.02 'Local Governmenf Investment Pool i--~ 4/1412005 2:41 PM ciec ; FOOTNOTES ~ Note: 1 Most revenue from property tax received in PJlay and November 2 Receipts and expenditures scheduled for twice each year 3 State shared revenues (liquor) are received quarterly on succeeding months. 4 Received quarterly 5 Payments scheduled for May and November 6 Insurance premium paid in January 7 Used for capital projects. Cash not moved until needed 8 Capital projects often take a number of years to plan, engineer, acquire right of way and construct. 10 AWC membership paid in early 2005 11 Internal transfer is made twice/year. 12 New vehicle purchase 14 New projects are exceeding our estimates 16 40% of this budget is reserves. Emergency use only. . .J 4i1412005 z:ati PM ~ - - CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY F DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNtTY DEVELOPMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR MARCH 2005 LONG RANGE PLANN/NG: Planning Commission The Spokane Valley Planning Commission met twice dunng the month of March. The Commission's agenda continued discussion on definitions and revisions to the schedule of permitted uses. Comprehensive Plan Development Long Range Planning staff continues to develop hearing drafts of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan. The following tentative dates have been established: April 19 - CC/PC meeting on land use rnap concept May 17 - CC/PC meeting overview of comp plan hearing draft May 19 - Comp Plan open house in Council Chambers June 1- Comp Plan open house in chambers June 6, 16 & 23 - PC public hearings July - PC deliberations ~ August 16 - CC/PC meeting overview of PC draft comp plan Other Community Development Planning staff met with planners from other jurisdictions in Eastern Washington and Dee Caputo and Dave Andersen of the Department of Community Trade and Economic Development. Mr. Andersen reviewed legislative activity conceming "Best Available Science", and tfie progress of mandatory Comprehensive Plan updates across the state. He also briefed those present on the availability of grant funding for plan updates. City Council invited Michael Freedman, Freedman, Tung 8 Bottomley, LLC, to address planning concerns along the Sprague/Appleway Corridor. He met with City Council and members of the public at two different meetings. Spokane County is initiating the mandatory update of the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan which is to be completed by December 2006. The Comprehensive Plans of all jurisdictions in Spokane County seeking amendments to the Urban Growth Area (UGA) will be reviewed by the Steering Committee of Elected officials (SCEO) and the Spokane County Planning Commission. The resufts of the Permit Center Survey are as follows: ~ Page 1 of 7 City of Spokane Valley Department of Community Development Monthly Report for March 2005 - . Spial:an' PERMIT CENTER SURVEY jUaile}' Qepartment of Community Qevelopment February/March 2005 1) I visit the Permit Centor 2 More Ihan once aweek 1 Weekly ? Onoe a Month 3 Occasionally 4 Firsd visit 2) The purpose of my vislt(s): 4 General Informalion 4 ZoninglPlat 5 Buibding Permits 0 Other Pennit 1 Meefing 0 Code Gomplaint 1 Hearing Q Use f'ermit 1 License 1 Other 3) The DepartmenUDivision I came to see was 6 Planning 1 Engineering 7 Buibding Permits 8 Inspections 1 Ping, Bldg 8 Engineering 0 Code C-ompliance 0 Uther (SpeCffy_ 4) I needed to soo (Name), and they were: 5 Available 1Qn (lie phone 0 Not avaifable S) Permit Center staff is (ciieck all fhat appPy) 11 Friendly 11 Courteous 9 Knovledgeabie 9 Fietpful 5 Prompt 0 Cur1 or abrupt 0 Discourteous 0 CtLteless 0 Untivilling to help 0 Slow 0 Other 6) Telephone calls to staff members are returned 4 Within 24 hours 1 Within the week 0 Never answered 0 Qtho( 7) My call was transierced 1 Once 0 Ttivice 0 More than twi :e 1 Never 8) Infortnation provided is 9 AccuratelComplete 3 Wel] researched 0 Inapplicable 0 InCOmplete 0 Otfier 9) The Permit Center is 9We11-org2nized 10 Orcleriy 0 Too crowded 0 Too noisy 0 Disorganized 10) If available, I usel would use: 5 On-line applications 1 fax applicafions 0 On-line payment 0 Other Suggestions for improving Serviccs All are professional 8 very helpful Very friendly and helpful - no suggestions Hire more inspectors Plot aoning sectron maps in oolor Keep lhe tolks you have-They are great! , COUNT 14 CURRENT PLANNING: The Planning Division opened 20 land use application files in March 2005. In addition, 18 licenses/permits were sold. The following charts track present monthly activity with 2004 levels. License/Permits include adult entertainment, home profession, temporary use and sign review permits. Land Use Actions include binding site plans, rezones, subdivisions, short plats, boundary line adjustments, street vacations, site plan reviews and SEPA reviews. 2005 Licenses 8 Pennits Issuad 2005 New Lsnd Use Actions 30 ~ - , zD IO - - 10 - iD - Ny ~ Apr uaV .U ,u .tisg sey aci I w, ns ° I la, rm wr Apr ►ar Ju, An 4.3 sw oa wr Cee O 7:i6 1: 76 :6 C~12i.s Li T1 ID - ' -aL'dt 6 9 1! I 15 6 19 tc t7 2i ~t~ 7 11 r2iM 2i 17:11 12 21 $ 35 22 Y 10 2E 35 t/ II The Planning Division also received 10 pre-application requests and approved 9 commercial permits during March including a medical office on Sinto Avenue and a professional office building on North Evergreen Road. An additional 18 commercial permits were received during March for processing. \ ` Page2of7 City of Spokane Valley Department of Community Development Monthly Report for March 2005 J Monthly revenue for the Current Planning Division totaled $19,330.00 in March; 47% of the revenues generated in February 2005, and 62°l0 of the revenues generated during March of 2004. ~ 2005 Planning Revenues i~ g50,000 , , - - • , ~ ? ~x ~ ; r,_ * S4V.LOO _ , ..v.. ~ . ~:3si-` r~ ~ . . -~.-n . . . . a30,OQ0 - t - - - - $20.004 - l ' - i $10,000 - ; - - ` ~ $0 Jan Feb AAar Aprll P,'by June July Hug Sept oct IJov Dec C~ Revenue 2005 t Revenue 2404 ~ In March 2005, the Current Planning Division served 318 customers at the Planning Counter, and retumed or answered 329 phone calls. Four public hearings were held before the Hearing Examiner in March. - - - -J 2005 Planning Revenues Compared with Budget Revenues ; generated by the Planning Division `~"~~e a.`'p~ ° ~ are compared with ' the 2005 Budget appropriation in the 4;•,. table right. dso iM,aao iul,aoo $64a30 fav,aoo sIm,wo 3azD,~u~ 5140,000 Sisu,mo 3ae0.003 J ~p Actwil YTi) e~~~cnuc aAmualBixtgc7 Fst;tru:o i Page 3 of 7 City of Spokane Valley Department of Community Development Monthly Report for March 2005 BUILDING DlVISION: ' The Building Division issued 549 permits in March. This is an increase of 272 in the number of permits issued in February and an increase of 214 over March '04. Twenty-three new single family dwellings and four commercial buildings were permitted. 2005 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS 600 • 400 • - - - 200 - - ~ 0 Jan Feb N-nr ^ Apr At3y .lune ~ Juy Aug Sept i Oct kw. Dec 1= 2005 Ft3rrrits 25~J 277 SA3 I - F 2004 Partrtls 135 197 335 290 `260 370 200 359 284 243 242 333 2005 New Structures Permitted 150 i00 1 50 - - - - _ 0. i Jan Feb hAar - A p r ~ May June Juy I Aug Sept Qct I PbvDec p New 1$ 2 Dw elling 12 18 23 p Multi-famify Un4s 12 120 0 O Nevr Commercial 0 18 ~ 4 The Permit Center collected $127,261 in Permit and Plan Review Fees in March, compared with $124,136 over the same period last year. 2005 Bullding Rovenues szsqooo.ao 3200.000.00 S150.000.00 2045 Rewnue Revenues sso,aoo.oD &3.DD .lan Fch Mar Apr Nsj JwtS A/y Au9 Se{Y Qct Ndv 17ce ~ Page 4 of 7 City of Spokane Valley Department of Community Development Monthly Report for March 2005 ~ ~ The reported value of construction, including ne+rv structures and additionslalteration is shown in the following chart, comparing these values with 2004. i ^ 2005 Valuation of Construction i $25,000,000 . - ~ $20,000,000 S15,000.000 - - - - - ^ ~ O 2005 Valualion I S10.000,000 _ - - ~-s-2004Valuationli • 55,OQO,QQO I SO ~ I ~ Jen Feb 1.43r Apr I&y June .futy Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec ~ A comparison of Building Division fiscal activity through the month of March to annual budget projections can be found below: ; T 2005 YTD 6uilding Revenues Gompared wfth Budget ~ Uccnsc 8 Fbrrrii Fces - - - -1-- - - ( ( I i I 50 :100,000 $200,00 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 S600,000 S700,000 3800,000 S900.000 t1,000,0 oa p Attual Y7D Rtvenue E A nnual Rcvcnue Ftcjccibn NOTE: Last month's building revenues were under-reported by $210,565. In 23 business days we performed 980 inspections. This averages 42.6 inspections per day. We used two on-call inspectors full time during March and these inspectors were able to accomplish 616 inspections. Our unpaid inspector performed 32 inspections during the month. We continue to experience a high volume of Commercial Plan Review activity so we continue to use our On Call Pool for plan review of one & two family residential structures. Last month 87 inspections were performed of which 82 passed. Page 5 of 7 City of Spokane Valley Department of Community Development Monthly Report for March 2005 CODE COMPLIANCE: The number of "Violations Reported" on the following chart reflects actual Spokane Valley Zoning Code violations, plus complaints received which were not violations. The complaints received are added to the total because they reflect time officers spent in the field conducting investigations. In addition, the °Investigated° and "Pending° columns accurately reflect Code Compliance's current ability to process and investigate backlog cases due to additional staffing. CODE COMPLIANCE STATUS REPORT sao 400 . , , . . , - _ e 300 - T . ~ I 200 - 100 d-Lm .16'. r5..~U.TITLLm~iE~ : i~~ .~1. Dd 04 A 04 1.104 J 04 J 04 A 04 S 04 004 M p< 0 p4 .tan OS Feb OS Ovar OS B Vbbtiens Reported p Abeterrents O Fi1e Transfus e '~endirg FCes The following chart provides a monthly comparison of the types of Spokane Valley Code violations reported. In order to make the chart easier to follow, activity has been consolidated into the following five categories: Environmental (sewer/septic, critical areas, animal and nuisance violations); Property (Right of Way, property use, dangerous building, landlord/tenant, illegal business and signage violations); Junk Auto; Solid Waste (solid waste, illegal dumping, and household waste violations); Clearview Triangle and Complaint - No Violation. A total of 89 complaints were processed in March. CaDE COMPLIANCE REPORTS (by type) 1oo°io so% . _60% - 443oA ~ \ 20% ~ r DA Ob A Q4 M 04 J 04 J 04 A 04 S 04 004 N 04 D 04 Jan OS Feb 05 A+tar OS B Carrptalnt - No Vlolation 28 19 14 19 17 16 21 19 15 7 19 s SAlki W'astc 11 19 31 18 15 23 22 19 16 15 18 10 15 O Junk Auto 16 11 25 24 16 24 21 19 18 17 • 12 14 14 O Clear View Triangle I 4 23 S Property 6 16 15 31 18 10 32 13 13 11 14 19 6 ❑ Errrironrnt;ntal 9 6 14 17 14 11 16 ~ 18 19 11 7 9 i2 ~ J Page 6 of 7 City of Spokane Valley Department of Community Development Monthly Report for March 2005 ~u~z•=n°`~,~~. ~ ! : ' j Of the twenty-seven Clearview Triangle 6 complaints reported by the Spokesman Review, `''y • ' four were located outside the City limits. Five p , stop were found to be in com liance with the i ' ~ ~ sign placed 16-20 feet from the actual ~ .._.F , ' : ' ~ • intersection. Thirteen are in process of abatement, and three were referred to the Traffic Engineer for a determination. The unidentified i•`. . . ° =object shown in the photograph below was ~ . - ~ -<r• - determined to be locafed within the right-of-way and obscuring visibility. The ownership and purpose of the structure is under investigafion. . ~ .~q ~ Code Compliance determined that the proliferation of upside down yellow vehicles were unpermitted signs and were unsafe. All were w removed from Spokane Valley within twenty-four hours. / e N iTANT APPROVAL y 892-9000 Ij, , .T' _ • - ~ . ~ ~~..~w' _ ' _ , . ,w ~ Page 7 of 7 Spokane PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ;I1111111111OValley MONTHLY REPORT ~ March 2005 Aqreements for Services Adopted and in Operation: • Street Maintenance - County Street Maintenance Interlocal Proposed Contract Changes for 2005: o In 2005 Contract, propose to delete reference under 'Basic Services' that worlc be done as customarily done by the County and add that work be as directed by the Cify_ o More detailed definition will be developed to the list of activities. • Engineering Services Support - County Engineering Interlocal • Street Maintenance (Pines & Trent) - WSDOT Interlocal • Solid Waste - Regional Solid Waste Interloc.al Wastewater: • Udasiewater Treatment - The end ofi January the City received from the County financial information regarding the County's sewer utility as it relates to the assumption of the County owned sewer facilities. Spokane River Use ,4ttainability Analysis (UAA) is available on the UAA web site at http://www.spokaneriveruses.net/links.htm • UAA group is schsduled to meet with DOE on May 11, 2005 to continue discussions on TMDL. Capital Projects: Construction Projects ~,_J o PineslMansfield, Broadwav Avenue Overlav, Arqonne Road Overlav, and Dishman-Mica Road Rehabilitation These projects were approved for funding in the 2044 call for projects. Funding for these projects was held up because SRTC used an outdated air quality model in 2004. SRTC resubmitted the information on February 15, 2005; however, funds have still not been releaseQ on the above prajects. We have contacted the 1NDOT Regional Local Program office, but have not received and indication of when we can expecf funds to be released. The projects are currently on hold. New project schedules vrill be developed once funding is approved. o CenterPlace The CenferPlace project continues to progress towards completion in a fimely fashion. While the exterior work is centered on the curbing, preparation for paving, and landscaping work on the Northern portion of the property, work continues on the interior with the finishing activities. Most of the floor coverings have been laid on the first and second floors, and installation of casework has starfed throughout the facility. Plumbing fixtures are being installed and commissioning exercises are about fo be initiated on the various mechanical systems. The kitchen is currzntly being painted prefacing the installation of the kitchen equipment. Painting and installation of ceiling tile is in progress in the large gathering room (Great Room, and supporting areas, with the ceramic tile wainscoting and floor tile already in place. Contracts will be issued shortly for #he fumiture and fumishings for the CenterPlace Project. The project will be completed in accordance with contract requirements. o Barker Road Project Project being designed - Value Engineering (VE) Study held March 29-315`, 35% Design Complete. o Barker Road Bridqe Proiect Consultant selected for Type Size and Location Study. Developing Scope of Work. _ 0 16th Avenue Proiect Project items being completed are yard restoration including sprinkler systems, fencing and swales at Dishman-Mica and Pines. Project open to traffic o Park Road Proiect 2ntl lift of asphalt and striping remain. Project open to traffic. o Sherwood ForestlMica ParklJohnston Sanitary Sewer Project Project designed - Bid Opening April 12, 2005. o Inland Sanitanr Sewer Project Project being designed o Parks Road Sanitarv Sewer Project Project being designed o Edqerton Sanitary Sewer Project Project designed - Project being advertised for bids April 12'" o Orchard Avenue Sanitary Sewer Proiect Project being designed o Carnahan Sanitary Sewer Project Construction began March 215 County Maintenance ActivitY: • City 2005 budget is $2,405,394 ($1,589,292 in the Street Fund and $816,102 in the Stormwater Fund). Through the end of March the County has billed $589,010 or 24.5% of the budgeted funds. Land Development March Activity: New Commercial Type Size Sharpe Short Plat Pre-App Abraham SH!' Application Fred Meyer Expansion Application Argonne Commercial Center Application Farmsr 8ros. Coffee Application Windsor Ridge Trip Dist Letter Intermountain Wood Products Pre-Application VVarehouse addition, 14,700 sq foot ~Nott-Aiavrater Pre-Application 15,120 Sq Ft Warehouse additon Site plan, App & Nome industry for Ice and Syrup Mixing Nelson CUP Environmental Checklist business 28 x 20 & 28 x 139 Lean-to with chain link les Schwab Tires Application fence New Commercial Type Size usry's Produce Fruit stand 30x40 in Parking lot at rUP Application McDonanid & Sprague Einstien Car Wash Application 3248 Sq Ft Carwash with 528 Canopy Systematic Machinery Add Pre-Application 6,000 Sq Ft addition to machinery building Valley Green Apt Launciry Application 5,760 sq ft per floor launrlry room Town & Country Addition Pre-App 5,000 sq ft Dry Storage Camp Motor Sports Pre-app 15,004 motor sports sales: 5,000 spec retail Bacheller Rezone Application Rezone from UR-3.5 to UR-22 Wiiitech Addition Application 3,680 sq ft Warehouse Addition Thome Apartments Application 16 Unit 3 story apartment complex New Residential Type Size Inverary Application/Sepa 15th & Chronicle Applica#ion/Sepa Evans Rezone i're-app Burns Addition ApplicationJSepa Purvis & Roeks Rezone Application Rezone from UR-3.5 to UR-7" Wilson StiP Application Divide .89 Acres into 3 lots Lippencot# SHP Application Divide 2.37 acres into iour lots Tulodziscki SHP Pre-Application Divide into three lots ubeck SHP Pre-Applica6on Divide into two lots Qihompson SHP Application 1.9 Acres into 9 lots in LDR Zone ShellEy Lake 5th Rezone rrom UR-3.5 to UR-7*, 23 acres Addition Application and SEPA into 59 residential lats Rigby SHP Application Subdivide 2.49 Acres into fiour lots Rooks Rezone & Rezone from UR-3.5 to UR-7* and 4 lot Short Plat Pre-App short plat Coyle Rezone & Rezone from UR-3.5 to UR-7" and 3 lo# Short Plat Pre-App short plat Rezone from UR-3.5 to UR-7`,3.14 acres Marley Heights App and SEPA into 11 single family lots Toliver Rezone & Rezone from UR-3,5 to UR-22 & 2 or 3 lot SHP Pro-Application subdivision Hughes SHP Application Subdivide 1.87 acres into 4 residential lots Hjor# SHP & Rezone, Divide.30 acres into hvo single Rezone Pre-Application family lots Application 12 month placement of manufacured home i cTT1• ~ Spokane V-a11ey Capital Improvement Projects 2005 PROPOSED PROJECTS Road Construction Projects Project Location Estimated Design Construction 2005 Total Project Completion Date Complete Complete Fundinq Cost ' Park Road - Project 2 8th Avenue to 2nd Avenue 711l05 '100% 85% $ 821,000 5 972,000 ' 16th Avenue - Project 2 Dishrnan-Mica Road to SR 27 5!1105 100% 95% $ 1,932,000 $ 3,342,000 " F3arker Road Reconstruction Boone Avenue to Barker Road Bridge 10115105 35°/d 0% $ 1,150,000 $ 2,998,200 ' Dishman-Mica Road Rehabilitation Sprague Avenue to Appleway Avenue 61I105 0% 0°lo S 49,400 S 57,100 ` Argonne Road Overlay Indiana Avenue to Montgomery Avenue 711/05 0°/0 0% $ 274,000 S 316,600 ' Broadway Avenue Overlay Bates Road to Sullivan Road 9/1l05 0% 0% $ 743,000 $ 812,700 Road Design Projects * PinesJMansField Project Wilbur Rd. to Pines Rd., Pines to 190 1011106 09'0 0% $ 620.000 $ 3,134,000 ' Appleway Avenue ReconsUuction Tschirley Rd_ to Hodges Rd. 9/1l06 0% 0% $ 166,900 $ 3,197,000 Barker Road Bridge Replacement Barker Rd. at Spokane River 12I1/06 0% 4% $ 702,000 $ 8,057,615 Sewer Projects Garnah2n I-90 to 8th, Havanna to Eastem 711l05 100% 20% $ 2,569,000 $ 2,569,000 Shenwrod ForesUMica ParklJohnston Appleway to 16th, Siesta to Woodruff 911104 100% d°ib S 2,570,000 S 2,570,000 Inland Broadway to Sprague, I-90 to Park 811104 75% 0% $ 660,000 $ 650,000 Parks Road Trent to I-90, Thierman Co Partc 10/1l04 75% 0°Jo $ 1,445,000 $ 1,445,000 Edgerton Utah to Trent, ElizabQtli to Park 10/1104 100% 0% $ 2,503,000 S 2,503,000 Orchard Avenue Spokane River to Liberty, Coleman to Vsta 1411104 50% d°/e $ 2,895,000 $ 2,895,000 Miscellaneous $ _ ~ _ Valley Couplet Centerplace at Mirabeau Point $ g,5Q0,000 $ 9,500,a00 CansUuction in ~'rogress 8/05 'i00% 75% Total $ 28,560,300 S 44,969,215 ' Stateavide Transportation Plan (STIP) " 7ransportation Improvement Board (TIB) (3ridge Replacerrtient Advisory Committee (BRAC) 2005 Coi,- 'Jion Project5 Merch _ s~ `oka.ne Va.l.ley 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane VaUey WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org Memorandum To: Dave Mercier, Nina Regor, Members of City Council From: Mike Jackson Date: April4, 2005 Re: Monthly Report, April 2005 Adminisfration aod Parks: • The contract for pperakion and Maintenance of the City PoAls will be finalired tfus month. The City wil] contract with thE. YMC.A. 0 °1`he Recreation Coordinator position was filled. The selection process for the CenterPlace Coordinator azid CcnterPlace Administrative .4ssistant positions is undenvay. • A CenterPlace Grand Opetung Committee held its frsl nieetulg on March 30'. "I'he ~ Conunittee tpured CenterPlacc on Apxil 13. • Parks reseivations have increased significantly over 2004. Idast year at this time the City had received 39 requests for picnic shelter rentals. The current year-to-date total is 83 requcsts, representine an increase of 1 0%. Mirabeau IVleadows received the rnost requests with 34 reservalions to date. 1.2ecreation: • There will be a public meetuig on April 14 at the Spokane Valley Senior Center to discuss the fuhire of aquatic f.acilities in the City. Utu master plan consultants, MIG and lhe ORB Organizacion will conduct ihe nieetuig. The c:itizen iuput will help formulate an Aquatics reasibilicy Study for the City. • R.egistration far surlimer youth programs has commenced. There have been many inquirics from past participants aiixious to sign up for ttus ycar's programs. • Recruiting lias coituncnceci f'or our tcmporary seasonal recreation assistant positions. `Ve will be laking applications th.rough the enci o.CApril. Senior Ccnter: • The association reported an increase of 41 new mei7lbers last month. "1"he increase is contributed to the addcd publicit}, from the Valley Voice and Senior Tunes. •"I'he Senior NUtrition Program is doino well. ln March; a total of 840 mcals were scrved ta seiuors. 9 The Senior Center Coordinator inet with the YMCA to diseuss potential partnerships for lJ senior progranis. _ MEMO '1'O: llave Mercier, City Manager FROM: Cal V4'all:er, Cliief of'Yolice llATE: April 14, 2005 12E: vlonthly Repurt March 2005 ,Attached is the activity re.port for Ma»ch 2005 for ilie Spokane Valley Police Deparcment. There were a total of 5,223 computer-aided dispatch (CAIa) incident.s. These are sclf-initiat:ed offieer cnntacts, 15 WeII 35 C3IIS for service. Uui of those 5,223 incidents, 1,415 actual repoits were iaken duriil'o Che month of Mareh. Attached is the breakdown describing those incidents. Additionally; there were 2,051 traffic st:ops condueted that resulted in 164 traffe repnrts. lncluded are the hoispot maps for March residential burglaries, March comrnerciaf rurglaries ancl March trafic collisions, along with February cS:.March stolen vehicles. t1 D NLI]NII S T EtA T IN% P: [n March, Sheriff Sterk realioned severa( of his ke_y COtilfllfllld ppSlilOMS within thc Spakane Cotmty Sherif'f's Departmenl; promoting Inspector David Wiyricl: to Undersheriff. Jail Commander laick Collins to Chief Criminal Deputy for Special Projects ancl Deputy ,lc-rry $rady to Jail Commander. In addition to these changes, Lt. `like Myhre_ retired in March. Numerous othei• shifts in person.nel positians followed as the realignment cre.ated new qpenings. Among the chanoes particularly affeccing the Spokane Valle), Yolice - ~ Uepartment was a move b>> Sa-t. Dale Golman to I'airol, with So . George Wiaen as 11is replacement in the position of Administrative Sergeant. `1'raffic Sgt. Vlartin O'Leary «<as tran5fen-ed to Criine Analysi:, and his replacement in the SVPD Trcjffic Unic is Sgt. Tnm 7'hompson. Community ResOLu•ce Officer Lt. Steve .Tones and S.C.O.P.E. Coordiiiator I34nnie Abernethy (both Shared Resources) have relocated their off'ices to tlie Spokane Valley F'olice Department facilitY. Couneilcnember Vlike DeVleming was appointed [o thc 9-1-1 Aoarci. Having someone from the City of Spokane Valley appointed to this board is an achievement that has been SQtJgI1t h)' CII£ C11:y and one lhat 1 anticipatc will be very beneficial in the future. .Also in March, I was humbly honored ko accept the Jim Chase Asset Builder Award, presented annually by the Chase Yo«th Commission. Continuirlg with aut emphasis on eduuiting our young people as future leaders, I spoke to a leadership class at Spokane f alls CommuniCy College antl spoke with them regarding leadership qualities and characCeriscics. l met with Spokane \+alle•y h'ire Chief [vtike 'f'hompson and discussed with him our cooperative efforts to serve the City of Spokane Valley. !`9ike and I discusse.d ways that both of our agencies could bette.r lalend our efforts for a successful parhiership iii our city. rC.)MMUN[Tl'-QR.TENTFn POLKII\TG: 6dgecliff S.C.O.P.E. held a Town Hall mecting on March 10 to plan neighborhood improvcmenis ttnd to discuss means of reducing crime. l~~dgecliff S.C.O.P.E. is the recipient of a Weed and Seed Gran# frorn thc U. S. Dept. of Justice its part of a conununity-based, multi-agency pro3ram intended to reduce crime and restore a scnse of pridc in part.icipatin3 neighborhoods. Guest speakers at the meetinz represented law Page 1 enforcement, prosccution, code enfarcement, cominunity policing, crime prt;vention, education and neighborllootl revitalization. "Unveil the Trail" ceremony was helcl at the v9irabeau Trailhead parkino lot ry members of agencies participating in 2005 Centennial Trail bicycle patrols. Mounted patrols by sheriff s School Resource Deputies, Sheriff's Reservc T)eputie5, .Anima) Control Officers. Park Rangers and S.C.O.P.E. gnd CO1'S volunteers the past two years are credited with significantly reducing crime on the lrail and it.; parking lots, and enhancing safery for t~rail users. Patrols tynicaUy target vehiele break-ins, alcohol and controlled substance use; and fireworks and anirnal violations. Bike. Fatrol participants frequently provide the criticiil linh between trail users and law enforcement officers who canno[ navigate the trail in Cypic.al ptitrol vehicles. QPLRATIUiNS: Lengthy Yrison Sentence 17eceived for Spokanc Valley crimes A 42-year-old rnan re5ponsible for nurilerous Spokane Valley crimes in 2003, including armed robberies at Corral West, Payless Shoes and Victoria's Fspresso, was sentenced to more than 35 years irt nrison. Ivlorc than 21 years o1' that sentence were deadly weapon enhancements tor conunitCino the crimes while armed with a firearm. Time sentenced on cieadly weapon enhanCemenis must be served in full and cannot. be reduced. I3ad day for check forgciy and councerfeit checks: Four suspects arrested same clay, separate incidents: A Friday in March, although not Friday the 13'h, turned out to be an unluclry day fior check forgers and counterfeitcrs in the SpokAne Valley. A 37-ye.ar-old Spokane man Nvas arrested by C)fficer Gavin Pratt 1'or rorgery after being caught atiempting to cash counterfeit checks at tlie Spokane Valley 1Val-Mart. It was discovered that ihe suspect had already csshed three of the counterfeit checks in 'Nlorth Spokane businesse,s the day before he was arrested in the Spol:ane Valley. A 40-year-old man gave an acquaintance a check dhat had been reporced stolen. AfCer arresting the suspect at a Farmers and Merchants Bank branch at lOSO$ E. Sprague, officers discovered altered identifcation in his possession that had I;hc suspect's photo but anotlier man's name and datc of birtlt. He was booked int:o jail on fclony counts of 1=orgery and Identity Thefr. In an wirelated forgery incident, another 40-y'ear-olel man al'tempted to cash a stolen check at the Fartners and Merchants Bank braneh at 10 N. Argonne. Etnployees stalled the suspecl until officers arrived; at which time the suspect atteinpted to llee. Officer Jim Ebel succcssfully detained the suspect for further investioation, wltich revealed that the suspect had been cashing che.cks that hacl been stolen from an 80-year- old custnmer of the bank. Officer Ken Uodge arrested the suspect and booked him inta jail on a felany count of Fnrgery. Qn the same date, another forgery suspeck was arrested at the lnliind NortllwesC Bank, 15111 E. Sprague, after presenting a check to an employee whq had personally closed the account last fall. 7`he emPloyee also nersanally knew the account holder, and while delaying the suspect, ealled the owntr Co the bank. Other employees at the bank branch called police, and Offer;r Ken DodGe responded. Officer podge learned from the owner of the closed accotmt that the check presentecl was a counlerfeit. The suspect was arrested for rorgery and during a subsequent search, officers fnund a small ambunt of heroin aiid drug paraphernalia, adding a charge of Possession of Controlletl Substance. Serial Scx Offender Arrested A woman working at 13arnes and Noble Books near the Spokane Valley Mall filed an assault report. after a man approached }ier and poured a liquid substance over the haek of hei• shirt, leading tn an int.ensive investigation by iMajor Crimes Detective Taoug Marske that resultecl iri the an-est of a 31-year-ald Spokane ~l man who for the past six months has been pouring semen mixed with another substanee into the h3ir of unsuspecting women. These incidents had occurred at both the Spokane Vallev Miall and the. Northtown vfalL The man was eharged with ihree counts of F'ourth Uegrce Assault With Sexual Motivation. [7etective . Page 2 ~ Marske believes the suspect has victimized ocher women in the Spokane area and encouraaed anyone who had further information to contact him. B;it I3urglar arrested Hundreds ot baseball bats wcre stolen from $rert Brothers Sports Equipment at 9514 E. Montgomeryo ur► Thanksgivino Taay Iflst ycar. Af'ter a 36-year-old man atiempted t.o sell 180 of the bats at the FaSi Sprtigue 1Vhite Elephant store (rivo doors down f'rom the Spalcane Valley Police Station), Detective i7ave Flerrin responded ta the store and intervieared the suspec[. He subsetIuently determined ihat the suspect and a second rria» hacl committecl the burglary at the Sports Fquipmcnt faciliey, and he recoverad sevcral hundred of the stolcn bats from the suspect's residence. Along witli mernbcrs of the Property Crimes Task Forcc who assisted in thc invesciga[ion, Detective Herrin arrested the suspect ior Burtliiry, Theft of the bat~ and Tr3fiicking in St:olcn Proper[y. Slioplii'ter-s Pull Knives l.n two separate iuid unrelated incidents; t-vva shoplifters threatcne<l store employees witli knives: Spokane Valley Police arrestcd a 40-year-olcl Post Falls, lciaho man for First:.Tacgree Robbery afier he threatened Wa1-Mart: employe•es witli a hnife during a shoplifcinL incident. .After 1iiS arrest, the siispect indicated that he had stolen items from a I-ta_yden l.:ahe, Idaho Albertson's Store earlier in the day. No one was injurecf during the incident. A 24-year-old transient slashed witli a knife at a store sccuritw afficer in the parlcing lot at Yoke's Pak'n Save at 15111 E. Sprague at'ter stealing six packages of pseucloephedrine cold medicatian from the store. Drug SuSpCCis use the substance co coolc up methamphetamine in c.lande.stine drug labs. The employee was not injured; and witli assistance frorn other employccs the suspeci was handcuffed and held insicle che btisiness awaieing police arriva) and arrest of the suspect. Piiza 1)eliven, vehicle stolen, recovered A pizza deliveryman left his hlonda Civic running while he ciashed into a Spokane Valley convenience store, zrid a car thief quickly dashed away with the eas_y-to-stea) vehicle. After offeers managed to locate the vehicle, the thief advised tliat his buddy hacl "dared" him to ste.al the vehicle wMcn they observed the running Honda. Officer J. P. Melton arrested the suspcct and advised him that he'd woii botfj the dare and a trip to.jail, where he was baoked on Second [aegree TakinD a Motor Vehicle Without Owner's Permission. ~ ~ Yage 3 2005 MARCH CRIME REPORT Mar. 2005 Mar. 2004 2005 to date 2004 BURGLARY 72 57 179 997 FORGERY 44 43 118 465 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 95 108 212 1,224 NON-CRIMINAL 68 66 193 916 PROPERTY OTHER 117 158 342 1,665 RECOVERED VEHICLES 31 25 80 390 STOLEN VEHICLES 38 45 114 577 THEFT 188 229 559 2,853 UIOBC 1 2 3 10 VEHICLE OTHER 0 17 4 40 VEHICLE PROWLING 94 62 242 1,382 TOTAL PROPERTY CRIMES 748 812 2,046 10,519 ASSAULT 81 75 209 880 DOA/SUICIDE 11 21 36 164 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 67 63 189 755 HOMICIDE 0 0 0 5 KIDNAP 4 2 10 24 MEMTAL 37 34 114 386 MP 7 6 28 106 PERSONS OTHER 100 165 323 1,fi24 ROBBERY 7 2 15 58 TELEPHONE HARASSMENT 11 12 32 190 TOTAL MAJOR CRIMES 325 380 956 4,192 ADULT RAPE 3 3 6 37 CHILD ABUSE 5 9 35 126 CUSTODIAL INTERFERENCE 6 20 22 205 SEX REGISTRATION F 0 0 2 4 INDECENT LIBERTIES 0 1 1 21 CHILD MOLESTATION 3 6 15 77 CHILD RAPE 3 3 12 30 RUNAWAY 39 37 94 437 SEX OTHER 17 12 35 162 STALKING 1 3 3 35 SUSPICIOUS PERSON 21 26 68 341 TOTAL SEX CRlMES 98 120 293 1,475 DRUG 80 118 234 999 ISU OTHER 0 0 0 1 TOTAL ISU 80 118 234 1,000 TOTAL TRAFFlC REPORTS 164 328 612 2,776 TOTAL REPORTS RECEIVED 1,415 1,758 4,141 19,962 ~ ~ ~'ak j Ia Jnse ~ f [ Farl:ei c) Uro _ N G PRr~CeIO( ~ Y f S~^ Y ~T cy S rings in t -l- _m e 6 L LL Ricli ,jr J--'-_~ I~; J~ V f18f1 _~,r 1 7 U ~--ltl tD E o C7 ~ ~ C fa~'f G-A 13rebeeu ~e ° (n. ~5 uClid ' f eferiCk 1--- i'y • - ~_c~L'~ Erbse- ~1,~? 6u e ~e bra~e ~ ~u tvt: iei'~r.-~ •r- ` m Knox0 hanncm,'✓Ifidl3na 1 - /ln~ia a c J ~ , tt . ~ ~ [QI • e_ =rrorF. 17- 2 r t- o Nolission 'l Missoon ttF I 4V 2 A ~e114 OnP. ~ Sita r ~L. ~ I, 5 8 - p _ ~ -s y ~ `1~~~'`_ _ s - ~ 7 ~V ~P n' I ~ Bro d y an j~' Lry ~CataI' o -'(F:I"._ o i e..~f9~ r M- ' ~1!. ~t I - ~ o~ '~t u~i r ~ .~n • ~rr . in C ~ a , ~ ~ .i• fic`~ ~ 3rd 07 Qtl 3 ` ' ~ - o cn }J`'' uq ~ 61~ ! cy ~ --~-`l_ ,p r~ .ath ^ i-- - ~b - • ~ tt~ ~ , ~//~ath~ l Shz c ~ ' B~~ ~L'n - - ~•f-t~~ ~ e(~j~- o I - - A~ YC l9 ~ '~~~1 C • 'l,lt ~ a - _ ! j ~ ~+.Q~~~~' _ av - e " ] 1 t , Q 181h ~',9~~ ~Jt~ L 1.~ r~f~yk I G' y ,21s1 ~ ~r C. ~ 21st G'~5tzr - `~v. t'- Z5t1i `TfS~2~lihl Jenn' _'m`?__tl~ (i5~. m o 251h '~`'l/ " ~ N - ~ ~d ?.C ~ ~ ~ ( m .5~ c. ~ ~i~ ~jj'~`. ~i•, .-..~i-I~ ~ 9 ~ ~I- 3„j~,i ~ 42f1CI r-~~ •~~p e1 EL [D 32nd ~ 31 st Znd 3 Ih " c \ / ,--71 = r Y~ ~ FE 4Wih .~-?'-13t?I1e T2(4 Stoien W E ~ [p ~ 1 SVJ7 O C ~ (7) ~ 4 1 L Veh(do ~ p ~ C L) ~ Eal I-X 3fd ~ r 44 lh m 441h ~ liT 4arig O ° ~ 'HS ~ ~::d- ~2~21~~` ~ •.,9 h~, ~ e ~ g F;z_ LLoti~r x m ~ th t) 0 ~ J 1@9 fb9edium j 571h CD f + W Higi1 67 ~ O o 0.5 ; Ndg6 Feb - Mar 2005 Stolen Vehicle Hutspots Map Prodticed: 11 Apri12005 ,y~~G k ,las ~ ~ 1 -o I ~ ~;(~ti~ta 7-5 ,`~e 5ansoi fD 'tJue a u, c ~ z a1 ~ Prin eto I,y' ~ ;1 Ile ~ ? - ~ ` r m - r' f E'f .JpfI119S QL I.L C a. 7tI~Y~ ~ r. O' ~ T w c wcn ` o \ ~ 5 ° ~ ~ ~n~~~te ..--r~.',~. c p m L Mirabeau, _~erick EuClici 5 Euclid ~~e _ t ~3UjJi9i~ ~ • ~ i .4'i Y J ~ a ` ~ . i ~ r 6Uf2 }(@ O~ ~ M iet c k r ~f ~;.E - titionnl°m~n''1~~ / d • se'` c~ ~~x= - :I annon~lndiana Q J India t~ 5 i. .~3 - p C~ ~ la ~ ~ -i~tara r ° _ usi issi~n Missfon - f1E ~ 5 f Y` ~ T Y" 4815 27FV18~ S ~ s--- ~ -.p f' _ J u ~i. r Shatp y ' a LL `C~liia ~ Catal~ o _ a+ Bro. d ~ 0 ial r 1 ? - _ - ~ r A . F, n LU alt~} Jj - ' ' r = 1 ` ~ •u~r~i ~ _ S 9 t - r ! ~ / f ! ~ I I P~~ e _ Y?~ m G~..._ t tn h 3rd a 41 cn luSi ~ii v , 6 m ~ ~ PZE 14th. E ~i r `'J ~L2 r_ ~ ~ y' ~ - •i , ~r ~ - r . ~ ~ -v~ ~ ~ a 18th 121st 2'f St 5 ~ '_.4 ~1'`-T~r rh` C~~ 24thr- ~ ~ a ~ Jpnn ~,•-~r ~4 _ '~2 ~r ~ Hu- . ,._J`~'! ~ y~~~ t~~ ~ Y 1 ~ 251h Q _ - U ~ R`~ 3 ~f - ~ 3 S~h ~ m 37.nd _ - ~ p• 2 nd ~ - 31 SI 20 ~ y1 r,~ 3 t~i~ _ ~ • 1 ~.a nd r _ ' m ~ • aoth ~ 9 c°i F } 7~ Belle 7'err, n. ~ y e ' ~ t~v % ~ Residentlef 41 Eurglary 'p c v3 _ v1, 8al z, f O 3fc-t U' a`~ ~ ~ / ~ Oyi ` rY N r' r!( L 44ih 5-! ,Q.. \ ~ tiBe1 dVis ~ 441 a I . ~ o i- f~a e ~ a t 6 a c Fio c, y~ p O Y i ~ d l U f T l 57 ; ~ ~/1 1' ~ M High Cc) ° 0.5 ;"A°~ Miireh 2005 Kesiclential Burglary Hotspots MapProduced: 11 Apri12005 Joso ~J' 5~'' ~ ~ja ~ r ~le~. ~ yr c+ m-~- . q T e S iings ZCL ~~`Prin eio ~ ~ Y m~- ~ r T~ -ir-. -I, ~ ~ ~.~u~ , O ~ K'fj .ilc"lIfs O- cl: (Z.~ 1 , ?V ` ~ , e • ~r 0 . } F d = i C ~ r ~ • ~ , ~er - ' • ~ ~ ,---~'~Y~" tvt~ra~~eae, x - - ~ ~ Fur.li djnfD ederick _ G~ a~~ j~~? 7~`~ 8u e,e Grac~ ~ ~at f ~ t A~t - C; io1~ - L jndiena ~ ~ ~~~~J rrr c~+ LLLth_ /Intiiana c ~ ~ ~ 1-' O}.- ` P6issinn , on n S C v~ ~ Y,,~~ 2:~vvaE ~ 5 •dli ° ,-'+:':i~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p~~y' SS harp , P Boo LL T~ ^ B ~ ~ c Tp VIE an o ` 5r` I ~ Catal o E~ r ~ Bro lki ~ ~ L - r- ` ~ y d J ~ ix - ~ . ~ I ! i .~tvlaoi~ _ ii n -il In r.l ~ ~ 1n7~.C ~(-I ~oT ~ ~ , pra \,e's- - a ic- 3td P1 w 4It~,' ~ c _ o m c~ ~ II F D' 20 411Z Cf c ~wii4 ~~y 6 V' 6 kd: E,=L ~I'~ F-lz l l, 8 tt ti ~I' s 7= . t~ ~.l L a:L t- m4 h a_ 6 4711, q -~-r~•`'~ ti": 1 etn ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~[I 72 - T~.-. a]. r'~ ~ „t c'~~ ~ ° `.~j ~e . ~ - 1 Y~ ' 2~I~ti 2af N ~ Jann', ~ ~rYs' \r~f m E ~~itl Lu- ~ ~ 25th Q,\1 3 ``y!V ~ 2 ti3~lti~ c 'C' 32nd 3 '1 st ~ 132nd 3 th E C. •90th ggil;? Tgr~ V c , ` ~ Cwnmcrcial m -'4 ~ r \ _ ~ 41 ,c i]- i~ v m ~ JJ " 1.~jT \ - C surgtory r~ ro 8a1 v 1::z' n r CI ~ q~ ~ 44th ^ u~ i c 't~ial, ,44t h ~ + ~q ~ m a Ih Y, o r C) ` E3. t ~i 1?e 0 T t~' ~ g d ~ o rE%'t~..`}! ~ , ~~~J ~ .c r ~ U E ~ lov,~ ~ ~ Medium 57th c'O M High O o a,s 1 ~+iles 1VIarch 2005 Commercial Burglary j"ll1tSpOtS MapProduced:ljApri12005 y. 1 JosLP e Sansn re~ 1 ~0 ~ _ - 6 ue ~ N z ~ F(incetoi L2 -y ~ e- Fs rings 'D u ich n)a 1~ y4LY ~L~~ ' ~ E- r a t • ~ - X f1a i d 1 r-1r >t - fia = E c L~ N 2 t y cc ry u0. - af a r ej T, Mirabeau - y y ~ Euciidy m' uclid ,derick ~ At i~tt'a Bu~ e e ra~:e ` L 4 h5oOt9om ,p~ S. , h2nnors-`'Incli9na-, QJIndiaia 1 n - p -j 12 u~ sb hlaission ~L1iss!on el 71- ~ ~rr a~ I C' ` -d-~ • ~ "'s ~1_' ' ~ ~ t :B onY SharP ~ LL nD `u e o CaiAlc o 2 BfUA' m q~ 2i1 w co , _ } ~ i , ~ . ~ - ~ c ~ ~ w m' .s y z ~ • kls u Ikl r i~,re d e \ dl v. yi' e r ` ~ '~y a ct3 n . ~ ~n g` aat au) / F Pcra e \ U ~ ~ 2 ic 3i` ~-y 31 .d.~ t ' ~ ti y r~~ _ ~ 4 'L+~ ~ ~liFa i W - _ > { ~ ~ r th y _ _co 1ZTt - - _'n t cc =LLL t t5 - 1414. 6 t Pi Bth u `9 d ~ n f~ ~ I t 5l ~21st ~s~eKO - ~W ~ 24thr td ir, L) 0 251h QOy~ ? 0 8 ~ \ . ~ i ~ 3 h c `m CD 32nd 31 si ~ _ 02r~d c •r a ~ 3 ih c ~ a ~ y . r• ' - , c QOih ~ U F N I Belie Terr a 7ro~c tc 4 L ColliSian4 ~ ~r-44th ~y 1 a u! c 9al V rd 44 th ~ _e ~ ~ d ~ ~ I 1 A , rs 4 ih ~ L U I a ro? ` ~ ~ Low rf *1, YE C~ A edium Lo~v ire = ~ c ~ M Medium ^4 57tn, ~~~j, ~•c;~ ~(j ` " ~ ~High o March 2005 Traffic Collision Hotspots Pnap Produced; 11 a{~ri12005 'c~` /l lY v 1 ~ S okane Valle Fire De artrnent 2005 Res onse Informatlon for Ci of S okane VaUe ~ P Y p p ~Y P Y INCIDENT TYPE Year to Date Jan Fr,b PAarcl;Ap►fl fday iJune 11 July Au iist Sept Oct Nov Dec 11-5 Sirtulure Fire Single Res onse 63 19 171 27 11•F Structure F(rc 29 8 10 11 11•W Working Fire 10 5 i 4 13S Vehicle Fire 23 8 7 8 14-L!H Brush Fire-Low 12 1 2 9 15S Trash Firo 3 0 0 3 18•S Alarm 5 stcmSinyle Rcs onse 17 7 5 5 18-F Alarm S stern-Fufl 94 42 24 28 314l8 BLS EM5 Alarm 677 259 201 217 31-C!D ALS EPAS Alarm 794 286 246 262 31-F 2nd alarm EM5114aas Casualty 0 0 0 0 35•F Extrication 2 2 O 0 36-F Water Rescue 0 0 0 0 37-F 7ech Rescue 0 0 0 0 404 Hazmat Investl ation 17 3 9 5 40•F Hazmat Full Response 1 1 0 0 46-A16 Auto Accident - Unknown Injuries 143 55 38 49 46-ClD Auta Accident - l.ifo Threats 10 3 4 3 60-5 Service Call 34 15 14 5 PAOtJTHLY TOTAL 1929~ 7161 578 636