Loading...
2003, 03-04 Study SessionNOTE; AT COUNCIL STUDY SESSION, THERE WILL BE NO PUBLIC COMMENTS, EXCEPT COUNCIL RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REQUEST INFORMATION FROM THE PUBLIC AND STAFF AS APPROPRIATE Study Session Agenda, Mar. 4, 20103 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL WORKSHEET — STUDY SESSION AMENDED MARCH 3, 2003 CITY HALL AT REDWOOD PLAZA 11707 East Sprague Avenue, First Floor Spokane Valley, Washington Tuesday, March 4, 2003, 6:00 p.m. SUBJECT DISCUSSION ACTIVITY DISCUSSION GOAL LEADER Public Works Dick Warren Presentation by Transportation Improvement Information Board (TIB) (15 minutes) / Public Works Dick Warren /Presentation by Roads Transition Committee Information (10 minutes Planning Jim Harris / State Environmental Protection Act (SEPA) Consensus? Agenda 3/11? Ordinance (15 minutes) Planning Jim Harris Flood Hazard Plan ordinance (15 minutes) Consensus? Agenda 3/11? Planning Jim Harris Critical Areas ordinance (15 minutes) Consensus? Agenda 3 /11? Administration Lee Walton { Presentation, Bill Burke, Incorporation Celebration Consensus (15 minutes) 1 Administration Lee Walton Review agreement for jail services (10 minutes) Consensus? Agenda 3/6? Administration Lee Walton Review law enforcement ordinances (15 minutes) Consensus? Agenda 3/6? Administration Lee Walton .General fee ordinance and fee schedule resolution Consensus? Agenda 3/6? (10 minutes) Parks & Recreation Bill Hutsinpiller Presentation by Parks and Recreation Transition Information Committee (10 minutes) Administration Bill Hutsinpiller Presentation by Arts & Culture Transition Information Committee (5 minutes) Study Session Agenda, Mar, 4, 2003 2 MEMO TO: Lee Walton FROM: Jim Harris SUBJECT: State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) DATE: February 24, 2003 The Washington State Environmental Policy Act is'a mandated policy that all state, county and local governmental entities must use when processing certain types of development applications or promulgating certain laws, codes or ordinances. Spokane County, as has many jurisdictions, adopted the State's SEPA law (RCW 43.21C.120) and SEPA rules (WAC 197 -1 1 -904). Spokane County's SEPA ordinance is unique in that it establishes uniform environmental review requirements between the City of Spokane, Spokane County, Regional Health District, and Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority. Each jurisdiction, however, maintains its own flexible review procedures. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the Spokane County SEPA ordinance without changes. MEMO T O: Lee W a l t o n FROM: Jim Harris SUBJECT: Flood Hazard Protection DATE: February 24, 2003 Since there are areas within the boundaries of Spokane Valley which fall within the national Food Hazard program it is necessary for the City to adopt a Flood Hazard Protection document. Such a document is necessary for communities which participate in the National Flood Insurance :Program; Spokane County has identified areas within the City which have special flood hazards and has adopted a Flood Hazard program and thus complies with Federal Flood Insurance Program. It is recommended that the City adopt Spokane County's Flood Protection Ordinance with only minor changes. By so doing the City will be in compliance with the National Flood Insurance Program. The City will maintain information concerning the Program, such as maps of flood ways which are provided by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. One may ask why adopt a Flood Hazard Program Ordinance. The simple answer is that if owners of property in Spokane Valley, which property is prone to flooding, desire to obtain flood insurance under the National Flood Insurance Program, the City must participate in the program by adopting a Flood Hazard Protection Ordinance. The ordinance's purpose is to promote the health, safety and general welfare by minimizing public and private losses due to flood conditions in specific areas. MMEO TO: .Lee Walton FROM: Jim Harris SUBJECT: Critical Area Ordinance DATE: February 24, 2003 One of the requirements of the Growth Management Act (GMA) is that each jurisdiction required to plan under the act, must inventory critical areas (wetlands, geologically hazardous areas, frequently flooded areas, fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, areas with a critical recharge effect on aquifers used for potable water). Spokane County adopted a critical area ordinance as part of their GMA Plan and although it is currently being revised in relation to critical aquifer recharge area regulations, it meets the GMA requirements for critical areas. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the County's Critical Area Ordinance and monitor any changes the County is considering and incorporate those changes into the ordinance at the appropriate time. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CiTY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO FEES CHARGED FOR SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CITY. WHEREAS, the City is authorized to establish fees and charges for services provided; and WHEREAS, the City is desirous of recovering the cost of services through the imposition of fees and charges where appropriate. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Washington, do ordain as follows: Section 1. Fees Established. In addition or as a modification of any fees established through other City Ordinances, the City may establish or amend fees and charges by Resolution for services provided by City employees, consultants or other individuals or firms under contract with the City. Section 2. Severability. if any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect on the official date of incorporation provided publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof occurs in the official newspaper of the City as provided by law. ATTEST: interim City Clerk, Ruth Muller Approved As To Form: Interim City Attorney, Stanley M. Schwartz Date of Publication: Effective Date: CiTY OF' SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 38 PASSED by the City Council this day of !February, 2003. Mayor, Michael DeVlerning MEMO To: CrrY COUNCIL From: LEE WALTON Subject: CONSIDERATION OF MASTER FEE SCHEDULE Date: FOR COUNCIL MEETING OF March 4 RECOMMENDATION: Review tentative schedule of fees and charges, setting March 6 as date for adoption Welcome to the "brave new world" of municipal finance. in the "good old days" virtually all city services, except utilities, were provided at minimal cost beyond the basic tax imposed on property values. However, in response to citizen demand for restrictions on taxes, legislatures, in their wisdom, have increasingly authorized the use of "user fees" to defray the cost of services provided to individuals and organizations. Basically, this puts the city into the retail business whereby we "sell" a variety of services that benefit a limited number of people. Typically, cities approve fees for services intermittently in various ordinances as they are adopted on the assumption that the charge established is sufficient to offset all or a certain portion of the cost. While the initial fee may have been adequate, the matter is soon forgotten and over time left behind by inflation and changing levels of service. At some point, usually during budget preparation, the Council (and Manager) wonders why a Department or service is requiring a larger percentage of General Fund Subsidy. The soon discover that the existing fee no longer has much relationship to its actual cost. This often results in a "massive" adjustment that creates a lot of anger or the council "cops out" by reducing the cost recovery target. For this reason, I am proposing that Spokane Valley adopt a "Master Fee Schedule" incorporating all fees imposed by the City into one document. Further, that by ordinance, this fee schedule must be reviewed and approved each year. I have introduced this concept into a number of cities and it has proven reasonably successful. The initial Fee Schedule proposed for Spokane Valley is based largely on existing County fees. In fixture years I would hope that a more systematic process will evaluate each service to determine its actual cost and the current amount of recovery. Good criteria for establishing the cost of a municipal service are rather elaborate. In brief, it includes all personnel costs associated with the service, as well as supplies and operational expenses. In addition, it includes all applicable indirect costs including such things as building and equipment maintenance, as well as recovery of fixed asset expenses and genera] overhead. Some cities develop a detailed worksheet that enabling each department to calculate this cost to insure that we are complying with state law, Having determined what the actual cost of each service is and what the current rate of recovery is, the Council should then determine what the rate of recovery should be. The ideal recovery rate, of course, is 100%, but in practice there are appropriate and legitimate reasons why the Council may set a lower rate to encourage or promote certain city activities. An aggressive recreation program, l'Or example, benefits certain individuals but also benefits all citizens by providing a healthy activity as an alternative to crime and delinquency. A city's contribution to encourage replacement of broken sidewalks helps maintain property values throughout the city- Urn sure the Council will find many instances where the cost of recovery should be established as less than 10094 in order to promote these policies and values. As noted, the recommended Fee Schedule does riot include cost recovery targets because we are not able to determine actual costs of service until we have developed some experience. l would expect this inl'onnation will be available to the Council when the fees are reviewed in March of 2004. Also, certain feet have been deleted because of limiting state law, These will be addressed separately as appropriate. In any case, establishing an appropriate recovery for the various services is an important Council prerogative that requires that you strike a proper balance- Once that goal has been accomplished, your staff can then adjust the actual fees to reflect (he recovery goals established by Council. The next policy question is when and how frequently the schedule should be adjusted. In order to avoid large "catchup" adjustments occasionally, I Would suggest the Council establish a policy requiring the recovery rate and fees be reviewed and adjusted annually. One City 1 was associated, provided for an automatic adjustment annually based on the C1'1 but that is not recommended except as an alternative if actual costs can not be deternlined. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 03 -021 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, ADOPTING A MASTER FEE SCHEDULE WHEREAS, the City Council desires that all fees that the City collects be set forth in one document; WHEREAS the City Council desires that the amount of such fees be adjusted on an annual basis to reflect increases or decreases in the cost of living; NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, as follows: Section 1. Adoption of Fee Schedule. The Master Fee Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit A and Exhibit B is hereby adopted as if fully set forth herein. Section 2. Grant of Authority. City staff are hereby granted the authority to collect the fees in the amount and manner as set forth in the Fee Schedule. Section 3. Future Adjustments. It is the intent of the City Council that the Master Fee Schedule shall be reviewed and updated annually in March of 2004 and in March of each succeeding year. To the extent that it is practical, such annual adjustments should reflect the percentage of cost recovery that is determined by the City Council to be appropriate for each function, program or service. If sufficient information is not available to determine actual cost of a service, the adjustments may reflect an increase or decrease not to exceed the annual percentage change in the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers for the period ending in June of the previous year rounded to the nearest $0.05. Section 4. City Manager Authority. In order to ensure full recovery of the cost of any Parks and Recreation activity or program not identified on Exhibit A, the City Manager is authorized to establish a fee not to exceed $2,000.00. Section 5. Severability. Should any section, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Resolution, or its application to any person or circumstance, be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid for any reason, or should any portion of this Resolution be pre - empted by state or federal law or regulation, such decision or pre- emption shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Resolution or its application to other persons or circumstances. Resolution No. 03 -021, Master Fee Schcd. With escalator 1 Section 6. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be in full force and erect on March 31, 2003, provided that the terms of this resolution shall also he in effect during the interim period. ATTEST! Adopted this day of February, 2003 interim City Clerk, Ruth �lt�ller Approved i5 to Form: Interim City Attorney, Stanley M. Schwartz Resohltion No. 03 -021, Master Fee 5chcd_ With escalator CITY OF POICA B VALLEY Mayor Michael DeV l e m ing 2 City of SPOKANE VALLEY EXHIBIT B Annual Fee 1. Aerosol Products (in excess of 500 pounds) S 95.00 2. Aircraft Refueling Vehicles $95.00ea. 3. Aircraft Repair hanger S105.00 4. Asbestos removal $ 85.00 5. Automobile wrecking yard S 95.00 6. Battery systems using lead acid batteries $ 95.00 7. Bowling pin or alley refinishing $ 95.00 8. Carnivals and fairs S124.00 9. Cellulose nitrate film handling and storage (in excess of 25 pounds) $105.00 10. Combustible fiber storage (in excess of 1 00 cubic feet) S 85.00 11. Combustible material storage (in excess of 2,500 cubic feet) $105.00 12. Compressed gases (in excess of table 105 -A) S124.00 ANNUAL FIRE CODE FEES FOR MATERIALS DEFINED BY THE FIRE CODE FOR PERR'IITS TO MALNTAIN, STORE, USE OR HANDLE MATERIALS OR CONDUCT PROCESSES WHICH PRODUCE CONDITIONS HAZARDOUS TO LIFE AND PROPERTY. Attachment A to the fee schedule adopted by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley No permit or fee shall be required for the use of candles in ceremonies by non- profit organizations. (State ROW) The following categories of operations may or may not require 0 permit depending on the determination of the Building Dfficial or the Fire Marshal. S -VFEFh 14. Cryogens (in excess of table 105 -B) S124.00 15. Dry cleaning plants using hazardous solvents $105.00 16. Dust Producing operations $105.00 17. Explosives or blasting agents (use of) $ 95.00 18. Fireworks (see Main fee schedule) S100.00 19. Flammable or combustible liquids S145.00 a. residential fuel tanks S 20.00 20. Fruit ripening $124.00 21. Fumigation or thermal insecticidal fogging. $ 90.00 22. Hazardous materials S124.00 23. High piles combustible storage $124:00 24. Hot work operations (welding and cutting) $ 90.00 25. Liquefied petroleum gases - commercial $124.00 26. Liquid or gas fueled vehicles or equipment in assembly areas $ 90.00 27. Lumber yards $ 90.00 28. Magnesium working (in excess of 10 pounds per day) $ 90.00 29.. Mall, covered (certain uses) (i.e.; vehicle parking, open flame use, display booths) $ 95.00 30. Organic coating manufacture $ 90.00 31. Ovens; industrial baking or drying $ 75.00 32. Parade Floats N / A 33. Places of assembly - commercial $ 75.00 non - profit $ 15.00 34. Pyrotechnical special effects material $ 90.00 2of3 35. Radioactive materials $ 95.00 36. Refrigeration equipment (regulated by article 63) $ 75.00 37 Rifle Ranges $ 90.00 38. Repair Garages $ 90.00 39. Spraying or dipping $ 90.00 40. Special reinspection fee for any permit $ 47.00 41. Temporary membrane structures, tents, or canopies $145.00 43. Tire storage (in excess of 1,000 cubic feet) $ 90.00 3 of 3 TOTAL VALUATION FEE S I to 5500 523.50 S501 to $2,000 $23.50 for the first S500 plus $3.05 for each additional $100, or fraction thereof, to and including S2,000 $2,001 to $25,000 $69.25 for the first $2,000 plus $14 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000 525,001 to S50,000 5391.25 for the first $25,000 plus $10.10 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000 $50,001 to $100,000 $643.75 for the first $50.000 plus $7 for each additional S1,000, or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000 $100,001 to $500,000 5993.75 for the first $100,000 plus $5.60 for each additional 51,000, or fraction thereof, to and including S500,000 $500,001 to 51,000,000 $3,233.75 for the first 5500,000 plus 54.75 for each additional S1,000, or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000 51,000,000 and up S5,608.75 for the first 51,000,000 plus $3.15 for each additional S 1,000, or fraction thereof City of SPOKANE VALLEY EXHIBIT A FOR RESOLUTION MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR BUILDING & FIRE CODES, AND DEPARTMENTS OF PUBLIC WORKS, PLANNING, PARKS AND RECREATION, AND ADMINISTRATION. Fees for permits and services will be set by this resolution for the City of Spokane Valley All fees are to be collected and listed on the finance department receipt under the proper BARS code number so that each fee can be accounted for. BUILDING CODE 1. Building Permit fees for each project is set by the following fee schedule and item 2 below. 1 2. The above table is to be used to determine the building permit fees and plans check fees based on the 1. B. C. O. Valuation Modifier for this part of the country. THIS MODIFIER FIGURE IS FOR SETTING FEES ONLY AND NOT TO DETERMINE THE EXACT VALUE OF THE BUILDNG. This modifier is revised and published every April by the international Conference of Building Officials and used by the City. The modifier of 1.0 is to be used. Decks and Porches to be valued at the same rate as "Open Carports ". Any separate deck or porch permit for less than $3,000.00 will have a permit fee of $72.00 and a plan check fee of $47.00. Over 53,000.00 will be at the rate shown in the schedule. The WSBCC fee will apply, and is not refundable. Except: The /sourly rates will be as follows in this Resolution. 3. PLANS REVIEW FEES are to be collected at the time of receiving the application for permit. This fee is to be 65% of the cost of the basic building permit fee as set by the City of Spokane Valley. Plans review fees are not refundable, except under certain conditions established by the Building Official. (See Operating Policy # 29 and Section 107.3 of the U. B. C.) This fee is in addition to the full basic fee. if a set of plans already checked and approved is resubmitted by the owner or his/her agent, an hourly rate of $ 47.00 will be applied for the re- review. 4. THE PLANS CHECK FEES are collected at the time of the issuance of the building permit. Other fees are to be collected at the time of the issuing of the building permit. (i.e.; energy code fee, fire department fees not already collected, WSBCC fee, plumbing and mechanical code fees, planning fees, public works fees, and fees in lieu. etc.) Each department for whom the fee is collected is to advise the permit specialist of fees due. ADDITIONAL PLANS CHECK FEES MAY BE ASSESSED IF CONSIDERABLE CHANGES OR REVISIONS NEED TO BE MADE IN THE PLA NS PRIOR TO APPROVAL. 5. Hourly rate set for City Employees $.47.00 SiGN FEES 1. fees collected for a sip permit and a plans check fee for signs erected in accordance with the Uniform Sign Code will be collected in accordance with the Table in Item 1 under Building Code in this resolution based on the evaluation established by the owner or the installer. The fee schedule will start at the $3,000.00 valuation mark. Signs valued for less that $3,000.00 will have a permit fee of $72.00 and a plans check fee of $47.00. Plus the WSBCC fee of $4.50. PLUMBING CODE 1. The fees outlined below are to be collected at the time of issuing a plumbing permit. If the plumbing is included in the Building Permit the unit costs are to be added but not the basic permit fee. 2 A. Basic fee for issuing each permit $ 35.00 Basic for each supplemental permit $ 17.00 B. Unit fees (in addition to the basic fee) 1. For each plumbing fixture on a trap ( including garbage disposals, dish washers, back flow device, drainage, hot tubs, built in water softener, water closets, lavatories, sinks, drains, etc) $ 6.00 9. For each gray water system A. Basic Fee for issuing a permit Basic fee for each supplemental permit B. Unit fee (in addition to the basic fee) Refer to the Uniform Mechanical fee list (Table 1 -A ) for explanation of each Category/ 3 2. For each private sewage disposal system S 20.00 3. For each water heater and / vent (gas or electric) $ 10.00 4. For each industrial waste pretreatment interceptor including its trap and vent, except kitchen type grease interceptors functioning as fixture traps. S 15.00 5. For each repair or alteration of water piping, drainage or vent piping, each fixture $ 6.00 6. For each lawn sprinkler system on any one meter including backflow protection devices $ 25.00 7. For atmospheric type vacuum breakers not included in item 6. 1 to 5 $ 25.00 over 5, each $ 6.00 8. For each backflow protective device other than atmospheric type vacuum breakers S 6.00 $ 20.00 MECHANICAL CODE 1. The fees outlined below will be used and collected at the time of issuing a mechanical permit. If the mechanical is included in the Building Pennit the unit costs are to be added but not the basic permit fee. $ 35.00 $ 7.50 Furnaces & suspended heaters - Installation or relocation up to and including 100,000 btu over 100,000 btu Duct work system Wood stove system Heat pump & air conditioner — 0 to 3 tons 3to15tons over 15 to 30 tons over 30 to 50 tons over 50 tons Gas water heater $ 10.00 Gas piping system — 1 — 4 outlets Chapter 13 & 14) S 5.00 Each additional outlet S 1.00 Gas log installation $ 10.00 Appliance vents installation- relocation — Replacement $ 7.50 each Repairs or Additions — of appliance controlled by the UMC. $ 15.00 Boilers, Compressors, and Absorption systems 3 hp — 100,000 btu or less 3 to 15 hp — 100.000 to 500,000 btu 15 — 30 hp — 500,000 to 1 ,000,000 btu over 30 hp — 1,000,000 to 1,750,000 btu over 50 hp — over 1 ,750,000 btu Air Handlers Each unit up to 10,000 cfin, including ducts See UMC for exception Each unit over 10,000 efm Evaporative Coolers (other than portable) $ 12.00 Ventilation and exhaust Each fan connected to a single duct Each ventilation system Each hood served by mechanical exhaust Incinerators Installation or relocation of residential Installation or relocation of commercial $ 15.00 $ 19.00 $ 10.00 S 25.00 $ 12.00 $ 20.00 $ 25.00 S 35.00 $ 60.00 S 15.00 $ 28.00 $ 39.00 $ 57.00 S 95.00 $ 12.00 $ 19.00 $ 8.00 $ 12.00 S 12.00 $ 1 9.00 S 22.00 ENERGY CODE Energy Code Plans check fee is also established to check to meet the requirements of RCW 51-11 WAC. These arc in addition to the Building Code Fees. Residential Remodel / Addition New Single Family Tenant improvement 0 to 10,000 square feet 10,001 and up Multi - Family per building New Commercial DEMOLITION PERMIT Plus fees for the removal of undergn storage tank for flammable liquids. (Mechanical fee) MISCELLANEOUS FEES For City personnel 1. A) Hourly rate for miscellaneous inspections Hourly rate for miscellaneous plans check Hourly rate for permit specialist Hourly rate for planners B) Overtime charges for: 1) Plans checker 2) Inspector 3) Permit Specialist 4) Planners C Hourly fees for contracted services will be D) Hourly rate for special called inspections. 5 • 2. Preapplication - building division. Fees for preapplication review and evaluation. Group 1: Small, simple and easy to administer applications including residential mechanical registered plans, extensions, basics and basic accessories and residential revisions: S 35.00 S 45.00 $ 55.00 $ 75.00 5110.00 W.S.B.C.C. SURCHARGE A flat fee of $4.50 will be collected on each permit for approved plans or any other permit that is issued in accordance with the Uniform Building Code. EXCEPT: For multi - family projects the fee is $4.50 for the first living unit and $2.00 for each additional unit. This fee is to be forwarded to the Washington State Building Code Council on a quarterly basis by the Finance Department. $125.00 $47.00 per hour 547.00 per hour S42.00 per hour $47.00 per hour 1 1/2 times their regular rate according to the contract rate. $47.00 565.00 Group 2: Applications more complex than group 1, including already built construction, fire service permits, accessories to residence, sign, shell modifications, commercial mechanical, additions, mobile homes, and other applications not included in groups 1 and 3: 5110.00 Group 3: Applications more complex than groups 1 and 3, including new residences, small non building permits, com- mercial tenant improvements and revisions, permits issued "subject to field inspection" and agricultural buildings: $150.00 Group 4: Applications more complex and difficult than the other groups, including small and large new commercial buildings, multifamily buildings, large non building structures or other permits with complex processing such as commercial site plans: $225.00 plus a per hour rate over six hours 3. Preapplication fees - land services division. Fees for preapplication review and evaluation and counter service fees Group 1. Small simple applications, affidavits, including short plats, revisions, shoreline exemptions, right -of -way use, lot line adjustments, all extensions, road and drainage variances and other miscellaneous services: 5 65.00 Group 2. Applications more complex than group 1, including clearing and grading, final plats and final public utility district applications, alterations to final plats, or public utility districts and engineering plans: 5110.00 Group 3. Applications more complex than groups ] and 2, including variances, shoreline, preliminary short plats, and SAO utility exceptions: 5150.00 Group 4: The most complex applications, including preliminary plats, variances, conditional use permits, special use permits, and zone and shoreline reclassification: 5225.00 4. Mobile home location permit and inspections. 1. Mobil hone permit and inspection $ 110.00 2. Temporary mobile home S 90.00 3. Manufactured home inspection per section $ 50.00 5. House Moving A) Class I and II Moving Permit $ 65.00 Inspection fee S 65.00 * * Plus $47.00 per hour after the first hour and 5.50 per mile if the building to be moved into the City is outside the City. 6 B) Class ITT and IV Moving permit $ 65.00 6. Minimum 1lousing Inspection fee $ 65.00 * * Plus $47.00 per hour after the first hour. 7. Work on any housing or building without a permit A) See section 107.5.2 of the U. B. C. ( Which says "An investigation fee, in addition to the permit fee, shall be collected whether or not a permit is then issued or subsequently issued. The minimum investigation fee shall be the same as the minimum fee set forth in table I -A. " This then doubles the building permit fee.) a. An investigative inspection fee 8. Special inspections (requested). A) Fire, wind, mud slide or flood damage B) Mini Day Care C) Nursing Homes, hospitals, et al * Plus $ 47.00 per hour after the first hour D) Special Occupancies $ 65.00 $ 65.00 $ 65.00 $ 65.00 * $ 65.00 9. Excess inspections created by contractor for a given project created by the • developer of contractor.. Per Inspection $ 47.00 Reinspections - residential $ 47.00 commercial $ 47.00 10. Condominium conversion plans review and inspection fee: This fee will be based on the value of the conversion and the U.B. C. valuations. 11 Temporary tents, canopies, and air supported structures A) Plans check fee $ 71.50 B) Basic permit fee $ 110.00 12. Enclosing of an existing deck or patio. A) Basic permit fee (The valuation of the project with the minimum valuation of $5,000. to be used ) B) 65% of the basic fee. 13. Swimming pools Basic fee $ 50.00 Plus plumbing fees GRADING A) The descriptions outlined in Table 33 -A and Table 33 -B of the U. B. C. Appendix Chapter 33 will be used for both permit and review fees. 7 Permit Fees 50 Cubic Yards or less 20.00 51 to 100 Cu. Yd. $ 35,00 101 to 1,000 Cu. Yd For the first 100 Cu. Yd 35.00 Plus $10. for each additional 100 Cu. Yd. 1,001 to 10,000 Cu. Yd, For the first 1,001 Cu. Yds. $125,00 Plus S12. for each additional 1,000 Cu. Yd. 1 0,001 to 100,000 Cu_ Yd, For the hirst 10,000 Cu. Yds. $233.00 Plus $ 15. for each additional 10,000 Cu. Yds. 100,001 to 200,000 Cu. Yds. For the 1' 100 C. Y. $368.00 Plus 15. for each additional 100,000 Cu. Yds. 200,000 or more Cu. Yds. For the 1 200,000 yds. 5503.00 Plus $7.00 for each additional 200,000 Cu. Yds_ Plans Checking Fees 50 Cubic Yards or less No Fee 51 to 100 Cu. Yds. $ 18.00 101 to 1,000 Cu. Yds, 22.00 1,001 to 10,000 Cu. Yds, 35.00 10,001 to 100.000 Cu_ Yds, For first ] 0,000 Cu. Yds. $ 35.00 Plus 7.00 for each additional 10,000 Cu. Yds. 100.001 to 200,000 Cu. Yds_ 98.00 Plus $10.00 for each additional 100,000 Cu. Yds. 200.001 Cu. Yds or more $1 88.00 B) .Land Clearing only - (without earth being moved) S120.00 * * * * * * * * * *** * * ** ************ A*********** * *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **A9: * * * * * * ** FIRE COI)I FEES ***************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** * * * * * ** 1. Fees for fire code permits will be in accordance with attachment 13, if deemed to be required by the Fire Marshal and / or the Building Official. 2. False Alarm fees l concurrence with the Uniform Fire Code amendment the following fees are set for repeated malfunctioning false alarms in a given six month period. I' alarm no charge 2 "d alarm S S 30.00 3rd alarm $ 80.00 4 alarm $ 120.00 5 alarm Require a hired fire watch 3. Fireworks Public Displays # Max. per RCW 70.77 S100.00 # This city Resolution also requires a performance bond or cash deposit of $500.00 for clean up purposes and a liability insurance policy of $1,000,000.00. 4. Plans check and review fees by the Bureau of Fire Prevention. A. Plans check and inspection fee for new commercial projects $ 70.00 B. Fire Watch Service (three hours minimum) 5140.00 Plus hourly thereafter C. Hourly fee for after hour inspections, plans review, consultations for projects that do not require a permit, and other special services. Time and a half of the hourly rate D. Hourly rate - $ 47.00 6. Plans check and review fees for separate fire alarm system or sprinkler system applications, and other fire protection systems. A. Plans check fee — Commercial — Fire alarm 1. One to four zones 2. Each additional zone B. Fire alarm systems - residential 1. One to four zones 2. Each additional zone C. Sprinkler systems $ 104.00 $ 27.00 $ 75.00 $ 27.00 Tenant Improvements -less than 10 heads -11 or more heads New systems 1. Commercial - each riser $180.00 plus each head or plug 8 2.70 2. Residential - each riser $ 90.00 plus each plug or head $ 1.90 3. Special water main extension or replacement 8 90.00 D. Fire extinguishing system: (other than sprinklers) 1. Fire extinguishing system $ 90.00 plus each nozzle $ 15.00 E. Standpipe installation: Class I and Class IT $ 98.00 Class III $115.00 F. Fire Pump Installation: 8105.00 G. Power generators installation: $ 85.00 H. Flammable and combustible liquids storage tanks installation: 1. Underground, 1st tank 8124.00 plus each additional tank on same site 8 75.50 2. Above ground tank $100.00 plus each additional tank on the same site $ 70.00 1. Hazardous materials storage tanks installation: 1. Less than 500 gallons - each 8124.00 2. 500 - 1,199 gallons each $154.00 3. 1,200 gallons or more $187.00 J. Liquefied petroleum tanks: installation 1. Less than 500 gallons _ S!24.00 2. 500 - 9,999 gallons $154.00 3. 1 0,000 gallons or more $187.00 K. Gaseous oxygen systems installation: 1. Less than 6,000 cubic feet $ 88.00 2. 6,000 - 11,999 cubic feet $1 40.00 3. 12,000 cubic feet or more $168.00 L. Nitrous systems installation: 8120.00 1. plus each outlet 12.00 M. Medical gas systems installation: 10 $ 85.00 $125.00 N. Hazardous material recycling system installation: 1. 110 gallons or less per day capacity $110.00 2. More than 110 gallons per day capacity $147.00 O. Vapor recovery system installation: (per tank) 1. Phase 1 - tank truck and tank S110.00 2. Phase II - vehicle fueled and tank $165.00 Q. 1. Gaseous system $100.00 plus each outlet S 12.00 2. Liquefied system S120.00 plus each outlet S 12.00 P. Cryogenic tank installation: (1st tank) $110.00 Each additional tank on same site $ 45.00 Removal or abandonment, or any combination thereof, of flammable or combustible liquid storage tanks: 1. First tank (commercial) $1J4.00 2. Each additional tank on the same site (commercial) $ 57.50 3. Contractors permit for removal or abandonment of residential under - ground fuel tanks $125.00 R. Fire Department fee for inspections and follow up. For initial inspection, plans check and follow up inspections as called for in the Fire Code the fire department will be paid 65% of the fee collected for the permit. This payment will be paid quarterly. S. Annual fire department fees for permits to maintain, store, use or handle materials or conduct a process which produce conditions hazardous to life and property are listed in attachment A of the Building Department Operating Policy number 23 and listed in the Uniform Fire Code. The categories listed may or may not require a permit depending on the determination of the Building Official or the Fire Marshal. 11 ***************************************** * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * ** ** * * * * * * ** PUBLIC WORKS ***************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** 1. Hourly rate $ 50.00 2. Construction permit for work in the Public Right of Way. $200.00 Plus S5.00 per lineal foot or $10.00 per lineal foot for Crossings, plus S50.00 per hour for inspection based On actual time. Cash, certified check or bond for right of way cleaning 3. Traffic Impact fees 4. Storm Water system review fees Plus $50.00 per hour for engineering and field Inspection based on actual time. 5. Water and sewer fees Will require a certificate of availability for water and sewer From water and sewer purveyors. May require a city street use Permit. 6. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS: A. Field monitoring or inspections of grading non residential sites. a. Commercial, multifamily, and multi lot sites — Four hour minimum S200.00 plus hourly b. Industrial or mineral industrial sites S225.00 plus hourly B. Right of Way permits Hourly rate C. Conditional Use permits D. Variances E. Shoreline permits 7. Site engineering review — for road design, drainage, erosion, sedimentation control, right of way improvements, etc. A. Commercial construction B. Residential construction 12 $1,000.00 Not available $250.00 S200.00 Hourly rate $250.00 plus hourly S250.00 plus hourly Rate after 5 hours. $150.00 plus hourly Rate after 3 hours C. Subdivisions, short divisions and planned unit Developments, right of way use and grading and clearing Permits ( including alteration or vacation of final short Plats and plats). Hourly rate 13 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT *:4** ** * * ** * ** sir* Y. * *y! * * *k * *** *k * * * * * * ***** * * * ** * ** ***f. ** * *** *k*** ** * * ** CATEGORY APPLICATION FEE SCHEDULE FOR PLANNING 1. Subdivisions * Tentative plat * Preliminary plat * Final plat * Short plat 2 -4 lots * Short plat 5 -9 lots Tentative plat Preliminary plat Final plat Short plat appeal * Plat modification minor major * Certificate of exemption * Zero lot line 2. SEPA checklist * For a single dwelling * For all other developments * SEPA modification * Exempt determination * Appeal of SEPA determination 3. Shoreline * Substantial Development Permit $1,000.00 $1,200.00 * Conditional use * Variance (The above three permit applications may be consolidated. if multiple permit applications are made, the applicant will be charged the full fee for the application with the highest fee and 5O'% of the established fee for each of the other applications) Appeal — local 4. Administrative interpretation * Appeal of decision 5. Annexation review and handling $ 1,700.00 Final binding site plan $ 1,300,00 14 $ 250.00 $2,500.00 + S50. per lot 51,500.00 + S20. per lot $ 500.00 $ 250.00 $1,000.00 + 550. per lot $1,000.00 + 520. per lot $ 200.00 '/ of plat fee '/2 of plat fee $ 95.00 5 325.00 + $10./lot 5 200.00 5 700.00 $ 150.00 5 200.00 5 200.00 1,200.00 $ 250.00 6. Appeals of hearing examiner findings $ 300.00 7. Binding site plan $ 500.00 8. Binding site plan modification $ 350.00 9. Combining districts $1,500.00 10. Comprehensive Plan Amendment $1,500.00 11. Comprehensive plan text amendment $1,500.00 19. Conditional Use permit 51 200.00 13. Lot line adjustment $ 300.00 14. Lot line elimination S 100.00 15. Plan Unit development PUD tentative plan S 250.00 PUD plan 52,500.00 +$50. per lot PUD plan modification Minor $ 250.00 Major S 750.00 16. Pre application conference $ 250.00 17. Signs Review of permanent sign Review of temporary sign 18. Home occupation permit $ 300.00 19. Temporary use O to 30 days $ 100.00 31 to 90 days S 250.00 20. Variances Administrative $ 300.00 Single family residence 5 300.00 Signs and all others $ 750.00 21. Zoning map amendments (rezone) 51,500.00 22 Zoning and Subdivision code text change $ 500.00 15 $ 150.00 $ 75.00 1. Site plan review General layout Landscaping Off street parking NON APPLICATION FEES Environmental Impact Statement To be contracted out. Staff review of consultant's work 16 $ 250.00 Cost to be born by the applicant $2.000.00 FINANCE DEPARTMENT Copy fees a. Copies of audio tapes, video tapes, photos, maps, or other records needing reproduction. b. Copies of written records $ 00.15 per page c. Copies of annual budget $ 10.00 d. NSF check $ 25.00 e. Copies of full documents may be purchased from K.inko's 2. Franchise fees Of any) a. Natural Gas b. Telephone c. Cable company d. Disposal company 3. Impact fees (If any) a. Sewer late comer fees b. Roads c. Schools 17 $ $ $ At cost ** ** * *3 * * * * *•Y. * * ** * * * * * ** *: *** **iciF:t*** ** *** * * ***** ** tat *i A:l-**:l-t.:F** **A**** PARKS AND RECREATION 1. Picnic Shelter (< 200 people) Picnic shelter ( 200 plus people) Refuse fee for shelter use Refundable deposit ( <200) Refundable deposit (200 +) 2. Weddings 3. Field Use youth — no lights youth — lights adults — no lights adults — lights League use 4. Pool Admission $ 1.00 weekend family discount one child free with paying adult Reservation (< 50) $1.00.00 per hour Reservation (50 to 100) $125.00 per hour Reservation (101 to 150) $150.00 per hour 5. Photography Family still and video Non funnily and non commercial still and video Commercial still (except weddings and graduations) Short commercial video Motion picture and film 6. Indoor use Open gym admission Admission to open carnivals / events Admission to dances Square :Dance 1 Square :Dance 2 Dance 1 Dance 2 Dance 3 Dance 4 Room rentals Gym rentals — practice, games Gym rentals — events, dances Rental of Western Dance Hall Recreation classes 18 $ 30.00 * $ 150.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 250.00 * $ 150.00 $ 1.00 $ 0.00 $ ? ? $ .$ 35.00 $ 35.00 $ 35.00 $ 35.00 ** $ 10./hour, min.3 hours ** $15./hour, min 2 hours ** S100.00 Now Handled by WDH different each Class 7. Outdoor Playground S 20.00 8. Trips Seniors, teens, etc 9. Preschool Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 10. Camps Day camp 1 Day camp 2 Day camp 3 Day camp 4 Day camp 5 Day camp 6 Skyhawks camp 1 Skyhawks camp 2 Skyhawks camp 3 Skyhawks camp 4 Skyhawks camp 5 Skyhawks camp 6 Skyhawks camp 7 19 different each trip $ 45.00 S 45.00 S 45.00 S 45.00 $ 80.00 $ 80.00 $ 80.00 $ 80.00 $ 80.00 $ 80.00 $ 93.00 $ 93.00 $ 93.00 $ 93.00 S 93.00 $ 83.00 $ 83.00 Includes administrative fee ( 530.), refuse fee ($50.), additional staff preparation and /or additional tables / benches. ** • Subject to revisitation as we acquire more data on the use of our facilities. fix City of Spokane Valley IncorporatiQnCeI bration Proposed Budget (as of 2 ) Option #1 Without City Funding Support Estimated Expense Talent Show Historic Displays Mayor's Annual Gala Event City Hall Open House Official Ceremony Supplies and Organization Project Fundin g/lncseme Gala Ticket Sales (500 X $5 00) Gala Sponsorships Gala Sponsorships Other Sponsors Option #2 With City Funding Support Estimated Expense Talent Show Historic Displays Valley Business Promotion' Valley Cleanup Campaign' Mayor's Annual Gala Event' City Hall Open House Official Ceremony Photography and Media' Supplies and Organization' Projoct Funding/In ome City of Spokane Valley Gale Ticket Sales (500 X $5 00) Gala Sponsors Gala Sponsorships Other Sponsors 2003 Mayor's Gala Event as of 2.x/03) Estimated Expense Artwork $ 250.00 Invitation and Ticket Printing $ 500 00 Event Flyer /Postage /Advertising $ 1.500 00 Event Program $ 750 00 Champagne $ 500.00 Spokane Jazz Orchestra /w Charlotte Carruthers $ 3,000 00 Sound and Lights Production $ 1,000.00 Hotel Cost $ 500 00 Room Rental/Reduction of Pnce/Equipment $ 2.775 00 Signage 5 250 00 Project Funding/Income Major Gala Sponsor Other Minor Sponsors Wine Sponsor Hotel Sponsorship $ 250.00 $ 250.00 $ 11,025.00 $ 150.00 $ 350.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 2.500 00 $ 7,500.00 $ 3,275.00 $ 1,250.00 $ 250 00 $ 250.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 500 00 $ 11,025.00 $ 150 00 S 350 00 $ 1,500.00 $ 3.500.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 3,275.00 $ 1,250.00 $ 7.500 00 $ 250 00 S 500 00 $ 2,775.00 Meal/Toast/Entertainment Included in Ticket Other Beverages Individual $ 14,525.00 $ 14,525.00 $ 19.525 00 $ 19,525.00 $ 11.025.00 $ 11,025.00 ei�v pF SPOKANE VALLEY INCORPORATION CELEBRATION l stAnnual Mayor's Gala '� �;• Dinner and Dance .e. ,iw. .r Featuring Featuring I � -' The Spokane Jazz Orchestra oon reee,k a Director Charlotte Carruthers .wcalist c1 :30 pm Soc l Hour 7:30 pm Dinner S:1 5 pm Evening's Program 8:3 m Dancing Ir, the Sp nc Jazz Orchesa is Availobie et: e Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce 17 E. Mission Avenue, Suite B (509) 924 -4994 MI Spokane Valley AmericanWest Bank Branches_ 10501 1 Sprague • 15606 E. Sprague • 9019 E. Appleway and at all TickenWest Outlets 1- 800 -325 -SEAT or www.ticketswest.com Get your tickets early, seating it limited proudly AmericanWest sponsored by Presentation to the Spokane Valley City Council Roads Transition Committee March 4, 2093 I. Introduction A. We wish to thank the Council for giving us this opportunity to present our findings at this meeting. The formal, written report was given to you on Nov. 23, 2003. We shall, in this presentation, comment on some of the more important points. 13. Introduction of key players 1. Ross Kelley, County Engineer 2. Jim Haines, Assistant County Engineer and a Spokane Valley resident 3. Ted Trepanier, WSDOT Regional Traffic Engineer 4. Committee Members a. Bob Davis, financial matters b. Eileen Allen, financial matters c. Deanna Horrann, Chair II. Body of Report A. Communications 1. Our experience with County Engineer Ross Kelly has been that he wants full communications between our City and functionaries who work for Mr. Kelley. Assuming you contract with the County, we would encourage the Council to conduct informational meetings with both Mr. Kelley and these functionaries from time to time. These include such people as James Haines, P.E., Assistant County Engineer; Phil Barto, P.E., Maintenance and Operations Chief; Bob Brueggeman, P.N., Traffic Maintenance and Operations, and Pat Harper, County Office Administrator. We encourage the Council to educate the public in why we are doing what we are doing on road projects. The City of Yakin a found that public meetings were not the only way of doing this. In fact, they found that public meetings brought out the more vocal citizens. To compensate for this, they sent interviewers into neighborhoods to get a better representation of opinion. At the public meetings, we could have trained facilitators, to increase the breadth and quality of communications. 3. We are supportive of City involvement in area and regional transportation committees and boards. 4. We need to continue to lobby the legislature for laws that are friendly to business. B. Fundamental Road Philosophies 1. The Council should set aside funds dedicated to road maintenance. It is very easy to lured into spending street maintenance dollars on other things when tough times occur. However, this can lead to the kinds of problems seen by other cities in our area. 2. We need to balance construction and maintenance. It's mighty attractive to have some one say to you, "I'll give you four dollars in construction for each dollar you give me so that you can construct new arterials." Arterials represent only about 20% of our road miles. It's mighty difficult to reply, "No, 1 need to save this one dollar for maintenance of 100% of our roads. Otherwise, my roads will need serious reconstruction in five years." Again, it is imperative that we maintain this proper balance. 3. We need to continue a Maintenance Management Program, where we consistently analyze each of our streets, assess their life and their repair needs, and allocate maintenance dollars to prevent serious deterioration. C. Immediate Contract Planning 1. We should contract with the County to plan, construct, and maintain city streets at the present service level. The reasons are: (a) they are doing an effective job of building and maintaining our roads, (b) their grant writers have been very effective in getting matching grants for new construction, (c) in general, citizens are pleased with the job they are doing, and (d) its not broken, so let's not try to fix it. 2. We should contract with the County to maintain our State Roads after March 31. They have the equipment and expertise to do it. The State, also, has the resources to continue maintenance of these state roads if the City wishes to contract with them. 3. We should contract with the State to maintain the signals on State Roads. They have the unique equipment required, the experience, and the expertise to effectively accomplish the job. In addition, they are on - call 24 hours per day. 4. We should note here that the financial figures in the written report were supplied by the County and may, of course, differ from the figures negotiated between the City and the County. 5. Administrative Services is an arca we do not want to neglect. There were over 5100 road complaints to the County last year. Each of these had to be logged, investigated, and an outcome outlined. 6. We need to continue the pave -over program. In this program, when trenching has required digging up a portion of the street, the County pays for the extra expense of repaving the whole street, rather than just that portion above the trench. 13y repaving the whole street, a sealed surface is obtained, preventing water from getting into a crack, freezing, and breaking up the street. Thus, repaving results in both a greater street life and a smoother street. This is an extra expense to the County, since most matching funds will only cover repaving directly above the trench. 7. We need to adopt a six year plan. The County can be very helpful in developing this plan. They have a revolving, six year plan that is constantly being updated to reflect the work they have accomplished. D. Longer Range Planning. 1. As time goes on, we may wish to do some tasks ourselves. The following can serve as guidelines: A. Maintenance Except for targeted tasks, the County may be a better choice for maintenance. Experience from some of the cities we have investigated shows that most private firms are not interested in doing the sanding, sweeping, plowing, and deicing. These tasks require a large investment in equipment, but may vary considerably from year to year, and, thus, not be a good business venture for independent contractors. Thus, County resources may be a better choice. However, striping would not vary from year to year, and would prove a good investment. Thus, contractors are willing to do this task. B. Engineering There are firms willing and able to do the design of city roads. In addition, the County has this capability. Thus, the City will have to evaluate each of these resources and make the appropriate choices. C. Construction. Most construction work is now done by private contractors. This would be a logical choice for the City. Note that, in each of these choices, the City is required to evaluate the resources, negotiate contracts, administer these projects, and manage these projects. Thus, strong engineering, contract administration, project management, and grant writing skills are required. 2. Private Contract Engineering should be done when (a) a temporarily heavy engineering work load occurs or (b) when some special expertise is required. Keeping most engineering within the County results in (a) developing a history of projects upon which we can rely at a future date, (b) a continuing sense of engineering responsibility for all engineering projects within the County, and (c) developing internal experience that will pay off on future projects. E. Road Environmental Issues 1. We need to continue building stormwater run-off facilities in road rights of way to prevent homes and businesses from being flooded. 2. We need to reduce the number of gravel roads in our area. Yakima has found that the cost of maintenance of gravel roads for three years overshadows the cost of paving the roadway. Paving gives an average life of ten years, plus the benefits of improved air quality. 3. Sand, salt, and chemicals all have their place in maintaining winter roads. Chemicals are ineffective at low temperatures. Salt is required to prevent sand from getting brick hard in the yards. Chemicals prevent air quality problems. The issue of which to use should be left to the technical experts. One solution does not fit all cases. F. Projects 1. We, as a city, will have to make a decision on whether to proceed to make Broadway a three -lane street or to leave it at four lanes. The science shows that more traffic can be moved along three lanes than four lanes. As discussed above, we need to do an effective job of communicating this and other facts to constituents. Uwe decide not to go ahead with the project, we need to return the matching funds. 2. The Valley Couplet should be completed. However, we need to continue to analyze and find solutions for the following list of problem areas: a. More cross streets may be required so that one does not have to drive a mile to go around the block. b. What is the economic impact of extending the couplet? We understand that this is now being studied by the County. c. We need to develop innovative solutions for attracting business along the Sprague corridor. These include studying other cities, developing alternative business environments, forming economic development councils, and utilizing the economic expertise of our area's businessmen, colleges, and universities. III. Conclusion A. Again, thank you for permitting us to present this road information before the Council this evening. 13. Do you have any questions on the report or on this presentation? Deanna Hormann, Chair }3ill Gothmann, Report Editor March 4, 2003 SPOKANE SPOKANE VALLEY Bpr gik Ave Havana St to Francher Rd Stage_ 1 - Thiarrnen Bth Aiwa to 4 0_,Av Fancher Rd SR 90 to Broadway Ave Park Rd - Lath Ave to 7 \ Appleway Blvd) d S " Valley Couple Stage 1 SR 90 to Thierman Rd Stage 2 D ishman Rd to U n iversity Rd Stage 3 Eastbound T iermsn Rd to Disfirnan Rd SR 27 /Mansfield Ave ' WB Ramps to Mirabeau Pkwy Bates Rd to SR 27—� Montgomery Ave onne Rd 1,6 Dlshman - Mica 'Rd 16th Ave to University Rd - Uni .r Dishmai, to issi SPOKA Mica Rd Ave 111 ALLE ( 27 16th Ave SR 27 to Sullivan Rd Pines Rd 32nd Ave to 23rd Ave AIP = Artarie l rriproAam 'ru Progrrpm PSMP Prrd>arrian Seery atid Mobility Program TPP i Tra ispcwtetion Pa trier>;hlp Program Wellesley Ave Evergreen Rd to Sullivan Rd SPOIYCANE VALLEY A:P PSMP TPP TIC TOTAL a 5 1 hal i., - b 3 1 ipf • Sullivan Rd EH Aarnps to I Indiana Av Sullivan R Sp ` • ue Ava- -t Brae •' a A!re Sprague' Ave r . Sullivan Rd to i d r . Corbin ' d tb_Av S. o t p rague _. - i . - ,,,ek of rnttry data Rd Proje 2 4 H d Val A d to Valley Couplet University Rd to \-- ,Evergreen Rd - 1 Sullivan Rd - - Ave to 32nd Ave fB Funds Proiar;r Lost $ 32, ©29,560 S 29,503.358 4543.075 1,053,811 35,750.204 79,39.364 59.241,833 103,966,133 (29q) LISERTY LAKE