2005, 11-15 Regular Meeting
AcEhDa
SYUICINI: Vt1LLEY CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL VIEETItiG
Council Mceting #SO
Tucsduv, November 15, 2005 6:110 p.m.
CITY ftALI. AT RED«'OOD NLAZ4
11707 East Spraguue Avenne, Eirst Floor
Council Rc-qudts AII Clectronic nevices bc Turncd OR DurIng Council Mcetiag
CAGI, T4 OItllEit
[NVOCATION: Pastor Darnl CaEc, Spokanr Valley Weslcyan Chunfi
f'LEOGE OF aI.I.FGIA.NCE
RQLl. CALL
AFPROVAL OF AGF.h'DA
IN'TROI)UCTION OH SYECL4I. (.['FSTS Ar'D YEtEtiEKTA"CIO\S
Ct,)M1VitTTF,E. BOARD. LU['.SnN StirlhiARY RE['ORTS
MAI'OR'S RF.PORT: Proclarnatrnn• Ninrger cued lfumeles.snrs.s :1ivwerress lUeek
PUALIC CUMMEI`TS Except whera indicAted bclaw for "public commcnt^ thix is nn oppertunity far
tfie pu6lic to speak an m3y topic. When yau cr_imr to the lc.:trrn, p1eaSC statc votir numr and actdretis tior
thc rrcord and limit rcmnrk-s to du+cc minutc~.
1. CONSF.?wT AGESYDA Cansisis of items considerrd routiiie tiN hich arc: :jpproveJ as a gruup. :1
Coimcitmember mny remove an itrm fmm thr Conserit Agcnds tu tk considtrcct separntcl}•-
n. Following ctuim vauchcrs:
VOUCI-iER LIST VOUCI-IL-:FZ T17TAL l
DA7'E Number(s) uUUCNER I
ANIOUN-T
~
11/01105 7898-7949 1,490,518.93
t liQ4;OS 7951-8005 255.690.23
GR1'tND "COTAL 1,746,209.16
'
b. Payroll for Pey Prriod Ending Qctobcr 31, 2005, in the nmount of S 198.0 77.•15
a Apptcrval nf Resalutiun 05-024 Amending Rescllueii}n 04-023, Frc Resoluuon (adrling 1SnuLry
1, 2006 I?ffcxtivc DUtr)
d. tifinutcs nf Rcgu[nr Council 4icxting af Ck:tohcr :005
c. Minutes of tircc;iil Council hlrrting +7f ti'wL-mhcr 1, 2()05
NEW BG'SIN`ES5
S~~und Readitlg Propuu:l t-~rJinan.:c tl; -i)Z ?(JU6 PnoJ~er*!. T ax I~eii I hr~rnPs;~ri
(public commrnti
t'uunctl Agcu1i 1 1-1 ~-U' it:E;ul.ir \1cc:;~s„ , ~ 1 2
_ _ I~'_.. _ . . i ' _ ~ . ii , . i. . ~ . . . . . i..
IpuUltc cuinmcnt)
4. First Rcading Propased Ordinancc 05-030 Exccss Tax Ler-y - Krn Tliompson (pnblic rummcnt]
Cirst Rcading Pmpnsed Orciinance 05-031 Amending 3A0.05011 Ccrmp:titive Riddine - i'.iry I)ri,l.c:ll
(Pabitc commentJ
6. Prupcised Etcsolut ion 05 -025 Acrcpting Strcxt T3cdication from'Croy and Deniss Hobbs - l'an !~r; ..,,•~i
[publlc commrnt]
Riotion Considcration: App 02-05 FinclIngs, Conclusions znd Dccision Rcrncuiding Applicatiun c.,
Henring Examincr - Cary DriskAll (qns«i-judicinl mattcr: nn putilic comment ii ill hr ta1sL u;
R. Motion Considerntion: Right-nf-wa~.
Stcvc Woricy [public rommen: i
9 tilotiunCuuidcruiian• ryv,;:1 f
(pubtjc cummen c ;
YUBLICCUNtA7FN'Fti ii~,:
thc pubiic to spe-ak on eny tapic. When c<•u ,"1„c ,.,.,r I I r ~,_!,:c 11)'.! irt ,
tltc rccard and limit remnrks tu t 1 i~..
.4n5illtLSTRA't7VF RFPOIt'!
IU 1•:rnpln}eeCla.ssiftcntion -tiin.: I<. ~
1I.CIMA Stccring C'nmr11itirc 11116'0:, %tL:i:n:
1)1~('(I~ti~O\, i outil Ef.~;~'--.:~~,; I,;~~r~•~~',~'i~:. ( li.,;~<<'~ '~!I~ 1_~'.,I1 (.~:t~rcl~~ti,i~. i'1._~~
litil'116tN1Aill)i\()\lA 11.•rM<<rl!<rI.+t~'l'r~t.~~u.i,~~•..r
12 Spoknnc 0-mnty Contract Update - Morgnn Koudelka
N1>MA It `Ni l \ I
t-1 Il_-KL:.tiC7I1:U( I_;
Rr',~tllnrC~nn►rcil.ific•lt!~;~~.rr~, nrr:'ri rr~'~rl.. „i;r,rr/ i" lr:,~~~l,:t~, h<-,rrrrrir~: <ltf,
~ . u1t:,' ',l;~.l'~ , i; _ •!,~.".,i . ~:i: l , l;~. , „ , i~~~ .
(.Ith~~r 1c~rrlu~i:c• 1_~riuurril;; .ll~~rtlrl;;~ l:r~•~r~ti:
Tucsdn}•. Navember22, 3005 - PI.F.ASE NOTE: NO MEF7TNG T[IAT NIGIiT
Monday. Novcmber 28, 2005. 6-9 p,m. 5pecial Cauncil Meeting: Centennial Middle Schnol Librnry,
915 N Elln Roaci Akencia includes a Public ftcaring on the Comprehcnsivc Pian Draft
Tucs.iay,Novcmber 29, ?OUS. Spccial Cauncil Meeting. Somo trntativc mecting topics include n Public
Heuring on the Pmposed Amendad 2005 t3udgct; a Public ffiearing on the Puri.s & Rocrwtion
MasterPlAn; Cnuncil Deliberation on the Transpartation ancL'or Land Use Chapter of t1e Draft
Comprehensive I'lati
NuTICE- Individuali plzinning fi mrnd the meeting who rrquire specinl misuna tn srcnmmudste physiCal, heeuing, or nthtr
irnrairmenf.e, pirxc cer.fnet th: C'i;y Ci:rk ;n (50U1 -i !;c,nn ls pi)\sible !wutluit nnnnectner.ts tta}' be miie.
Agcniis I 1-15-U< itcgut.uN1ccttng f'agc 2 uf 2
F {.1T3 i}f .
~ ~~ne
~
~ .;,OValley
~~~~~AWA~S WEEX
V4'1TFREAS, for khe past scvcral years #he National Coalitioti for the I-lomeless and Naiional
Student Campaign Apurst Hunger and Homelessnss has spansored Nationx! Hunpr aild
HorniJess{,Awareness 1'deek; and .
W I-iti 1tEAS, the ptErpasc of thiq proclamation is to edui~ atc Uie pnhlic about tlie niany rea son s .
people ~ire huugry aitd homeless IiIC:lUCI3i1g thc shortage of afFordable housing~-ui f.be Cif}F of
Spok-anc Virlle-y for very law income residezkts; and to encnurage support of hameless t~ssistance'
service providers as well :,is coinnyunity seFVice appori:unities for studcnts and cchoal service arQan;rations; a,id . NV-fXFRCAS, there are m~ny organizations committad to sheltenog and provicliog supportive
services as wefl tis meals and food supplies ko the homeless; and
WHEREAS, 6S'i tlati0fkr7l fFlellle of HomeZess A.warc~oess V4'eek 2005 is "Bringing Anerica .
aiid . .
VffEREAS, I:hc istitcnt ofNatioii al llunger and Homeless 1lwareness Weck is c[~nsisteiitwith di e
.
C ify ofdi e Spakana' Vtilley Cjty Council activities_ - -
5
NOW THEREFORF i, MAYOR. DIANA W7LH1`1'E, ON BEH1LF OF T"HE C71 YCOUNCTT.,
OF '.FH.E CITY Or.• SPOJCANE vALLEY, 'WASHNGTON, PROCLrt~I NOV_EJVU3T.R 13-19;
2005 AS `
glung6r andOomekSS,4 wa ?'ene.SS `~~ek
~n Spokanc V~,il Icy, Washingtnn, and 1 encourage all ci#izens to recogniae that many peaple do noC
liave Iiousing fuid need support from citizens, the prteral public and privai:e roxkproFt servic.c
eiitities. .
DATED khis 15Lh day of November, 2005_ ,
r
Y
DitLna Wilhite, Mayor
~
~ h
k
;
5
,~t;~~l'd+~.~}5
45 jY t . t,. .
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
~ Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 11-15-05 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: x consent ❑ old business new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Following Vouchers:
BACKGROUND:
VOUCHER L1ST VOUCI=IER TOTAi.,
DATE Number(s) VOUCHEIt
AA40UNT I 1/01/05 7898-7949 1,490,518.93
11/04/05 7951-8005 255,690.23
GRANn TOTAL 1 746,209.16
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Approve claims for vouchers:
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: Mary Baslington
ATTACHMENTS Voucher Lists
, ;
vchlist . Voucher List Page: 1
11/0112005 11:37:34AM . Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Vouchcr Date Vendor . Invoice PO # DescriptionlAccount Amount
7898 10f28/2005 000177 U.S. I'OS7AL SERVICE 10/14l05 SVSC f'ostag SENIOR CENTER NEWSLEITER PC 188.17
, Total : 188.17
7908 10l31/2005 000150 ALLIED FIRE & SECURITY 215854 CENTERPLACE LOCKS 8 KEY 86.15
Total : 86.15
7909 10l31/2005 000335 ALl'ON'S TIRE INC. 6-8468 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 175.85
' Total : 175.85
7910 10/31/2005 000168 B & C TELEPHONE INC. 102967 40800 MITEL 3300 VOIP INSTALL - LABOR 12,819.49
. 102968 40648 CSU FOR POIN7 TO POINT T1 FOR 804.96
103359 7ELEPHONE REPAIR & LABOR 445.94
' Total : 14,070.39
7911 10/31/2005 000938 CARLSTROM, KELLY 10124l05 Refund _ REFUND DEPOSIT FOR CENTERPL 50.00
Total : 50.00
7912 10/31/2005 000101 COWG UK43539 40746 LCD PROJECTOR FOR CENTERPU 2,437.70
UK97279 40746 PLANAR PL190M 19' LCD MONITOF 400.40
UL38645 40751 HP SDLT STORAGE MEDIA 571.71
- UM53716 40755 RACK MOUNT POWER S7RI1' 109,10
Total : 3,518.91
7913 10l31/2005 000863 CENTURY WES7 ENGINEERING CORP. 022967 40670 8TH AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION A 15,205.29
Total : 15,205.29
7914 10131f2005 000109 COFFEE SYSTEMS INC 34651 COFFEE & TEA - CEN7ERPLACE 138.24
34658 COFFEE & TEA SUPPUES 93.41
• Total : 231.65
7915 10/31/2005 000603 CONTRACT DESIGN ASSOC., INC. 20736 40668 ATi'ORNEY FURNI7URE 1,528.50
Total : 1,528.50
7916 10131/2005 000683 DAVID EVANS & ASSOCIATES 179165 40562 SI'OKANE VALLEY PLAN REVIEW 2,614.89
Total : 2,614.89
7917 10/31/2005 000152 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RE-313-AT851011075 SIGNAL & ILLUMINATION MAINT. 2,730.09
- . , . 1e: 1
. r
_ ~_.i
.J0
vchlist Voucner.List
Page: 2
1110112005 11:37:34AM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount
7917 10/31/2005 000152 pEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (Continued) '
. RE-313-ATR-51011076 STATE ROUTE ROADWAY MAIN7. 5,707.56
Total : 8,437.65
7918 10/31/2005 000028 FARMERS & MERCHANTS BANK 10113105 MasterCard CREDIT CARD CHARGES 2,672.44
Total : 2,672.44
7919 10131l2005 000858 FOOD EQUIPMENT INTL, INC. 4119 40767 AIRPOTS FOR CENTERPLACE 391.69
Total : . 391.69
7920 10131/2005 000171 GEIGER CORRECTIONS CENTER 9105 Geiger Corr. GEIGER PROGRAMS FOR 9105 15,159.50
• Total : 15,159.50
7921 10131/2005 000007 GRAINGER INC. 800-980395-1 40777 DEUNEATOR POS7S 58.38
, Total : 58.38
7822 10/31l2005 000009 MEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 39016928 40757 300 GB SCSI HP ULTRA 320 NARD 1,631.84
Total : 1,631.84
7923 10/31l2005 000222 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP. 24501 ICMA QTRLY PLAN FEE-401A 250.00
24506 ICMA QTRLY PLAN FEE-401A EXEC 125.00
Total : 375.00
7924 10f3112005 000070 INLAND POWER AND LIGHT CO 94202-010 STREET POWER IIGHTING CHARG 186.40
Total : 186.40
7925 10/31/2005 000117 JOURNAL NEWS PUBLISHING INC. 26756 ADVERTISING 61.50
' 26757 ADVERTI S I NG 84.00
26758 • ADVERTISING 33.60
26759 ADVERTI S I NG 50.40
26771 . ADVERTISING 66.75
26772 ' ADVERTISING 72,00
26796 ADVERTISING 63.55
_ 26798 ADVERTI S I NG 149.80
26799 ADVERTISING . 30.00
26800 ADVERTISING 117.75
Total : 729.35
Pa g e: 2
vchitst VouCher Llst Page: 3
11l0112005 11:37:34AM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank .
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptionlAccount Amount
7926 10l31/2005 000864 JUB ENGINEERS, INC. 34305 40672 0046 MONTGOMERY CONSTRUCTI 23,819.30
' 34783 40672 0046 MON7GOMERY CONSTRUCTI 13,047.93
Total : 36,867.23
7927 10/3112005 000933 LAW SEMINARS INTERNATIONAL 24673 • 40781 GROWTH MGM7 SEMINAR-KERSTE 695.00
Total : 695.00
7928 10/31/2005 000887 LCD EXPOSI710N SERVICES INC. 49871 CANOPY FOR CENTERPLACE OPE 323.33
49954 40713 CEN7ERPLACE ADVERTISING 499.06
49957 40713 WATER BOTfLES FOR VALLEYFE: 1,502.12
Total : 2,324.51
7929 10/3112005 000033 MCPC, INC. 4820177 40779 OFFICE SUPPLIES 60.09
4820857 40779 . OFFICE SUPPLIES 258.07
Total : 318.16
7930 10/31/2005 000788 MEDIA JOE, INC. 2377 40769 INSTALL WIRING - CEtJTERPI.ACE 711.12
Total : 711.12
7931 10/31/2005 000089 MERCIER, DAVID 11l01/05 Mercier AUTOMOBILE ALLOWANCE 400.00
Total : 400.00
7932 10131/2005 000861 NELSON LANDSCAPE SERVIC E, INC SV-80726 40774 CENTERPLACE GRADING - 0015 1:9,825.12
_ Total : 19,825.12
7933 10/31/2005 000239 NORTHWEST BUSINESS STAMP INC. 55976 40753 CUSTOM STAMPS 217.49
Total : 217.49
7934 10131P2005 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 307851654-001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 227.47
307851-656-001 OFFICE SUPPUES 89.84
40722
307988815-001 OFFICE SUPPLIES -307.33
309187940-001 40739 OFFICE SUPPLIES 157.33
309187940-002 40739 OFFICE SUPPLIES 17.39
• - 309188287-001 40739 OFFICE SUPPLIES 125.06 . 309195912-001 40730 OFFICE SUPPLIES 367.78
309199077-001 40730 OFFICE SUPPLIES . 224.77
309360172-001 40742 OFFICE SUPPLIES 150.11
":Ie: 3
_ . . .
. vChlist VouCher LISt , Page: 4
11101/2005 11:37:34AM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank .
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount
7934 10l3112005 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. (Continued)
349637911-041 40749 OFFICE SUPPUES 154.41
310335111-001 40754 OFFICE SUPPLIES 609.21
40754
310335114-001 40754 OFFICE SUPPLIES 67.77
310359841-001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 31.41
Total : 1,915.22
7935 10/3112005 000691 OLSTEN INC. 61917672 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVI 580.00
61935577 7EMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVI 580.00
Total : 1,160.00
7936 10/31/2005 000119 PIP PRINTING INC. 1330031950 40744 BUSINESS CARDS 117.22
1330032094 40772 COMP PLAN INVITA"f'IONS 942.48
1330032103 MAPS FOR COMP PI.AN 76.13
13330031836 COMP PIAN PRINTINC 5,671.26
Total: 6,807.09 ,
7937 10/31/2005 000494 I'RO PEOPLE STAFFING SERV INC. 6,416 TEMPORAFtY EMPLOYMENT SERVI 1,167.79
6,417 7EMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVI 565.60
6199 TEMPORARY EMPIOYMENT SERVI 1,09$.69
Total : 2,832.08
7938 10/31/2005 000019 PURRFEC7 LOGOS, INC. . 14763 LOGOS FOR POLICE VEMICLES 2,734.20
' Total : 2,734.20
7939 10131l2005 000322 QWEST 509-924-4707F 895B . TELEPHONE CHARGES-TEI2RACE 68.72
Totai : 68.72
7940 10/31/2005 000415 ROSAUERS U-CI7Y INC. 577941 MEETING SUPPLIES 24.67
579930 MEETING SUPPLIES 1.29
. Total : 25.96
7941 10l3112005 000324 SCWD #3 170-0040-03 WATER CHARGES 106.03
475-1495-00 WA7ER CHARGES 53.85
Total : 159.88
7942 10l31f2005 000172 SPOKANE COUNTY EPlGINEER VLY0509 COUNIY ENGIPlEERING SERVICES 227,343.58
Page:4
vchlist Voucher List Page: 5
11101/2005 11:37:34AM , Spokarie Valley
Bank code : apbank , Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptionlAccount Amount
7942 10/31/2005 000172 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER (Continued) • VLY0509 40720 COUNTY ENGINEERING SERVICES 10,982.02
40720
Total : 238,325.60
7943 10/31/2005 000001 SPOKANE COUNI'Y 7REASURER 10/20105 County COUNI'Y CONTRACT PAYMEN75 1,074,171.10
Total : 1,074,171.10
7944 10f31J2005 000898 SPOKANE PROCARE 100377 40716 TREE REPLACEMENT ON SPRAGU 2,625.70
Total : 2,625.70
7945 10131/2005 000451 SPOKANE REGIONAL SPORTS INC., COI 10/11l05 Sports Comm TOURISM PROMOTION 18,750.00
Total : 18,750.00
7946 10/31/2005 000885 STAGERIGHT INC. 97499 40704 A.D.A. RAMPS & GUARDRAILS 9,949.00
Total : 9,949.00
7947 10131/2005 000936 VALLEY STUDIO 5242 PORTRAIT OF VALLEY YOUTH C0A 54.30
Total : 54.30
7948 10l31/2045 000295 VALLEYFEST 10/28/05 Vaileyfest REIM6. VALLEYFES7 FOR CP ENTE 1,400.00
, Total : 1,400.00
7949 10/31/2005 000167 VERA WATER & POWER 0005-016348.01 S7REE7 POWER LIGHTING CHARC 65.99
, 0006-033021.00 . STREET POWER LIGHTINGNVA7EF 67.54
0007-017753.01 STREET POWER LIGHTING/WATEF 15.98
0008-010790.01 S7REET POWER LIGHTING CHARC 58.62
' 0010-003488.01 STREET POWER LIGHTING CHARC 120.22
0011-010826.01 STREET POWER LIGHTINGMIATEF 35.41
0012-004137.02 STREET POWER LIGHTING/WATEF 266.53
0014-004275_01 STREET POWER LICyHTINCMIATEF 47.42
. 0014-032971.00 S7REE7 pOWER LIGHTING CHARG 45.52
0016-032589.01 STREET POWER LIGWTING/WATEF 97.50
0030-031942.01 ' STREET POWER LIGHTING CHARG 48.67
Total : 869.40
43 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 1,490,518.93
-:~e: 5
- _ %
vchlist Voucher List Page: 6
11101/2005 11:37:34AM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptionlAccount Amount
43 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 1,490,518.93
, I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, '
that the malerials have been furnished, the servioes rendered, or the labnr performed as doscribed herein
and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obliga6on against the City of Spolcane VaUoy, and that I am •
authorized to authenticate and ceRify to said claim.
Finance pirector Date
, Page: 6
vchlist Voucher List Page: 1
1.1/0412005 1:46:35PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank .
Voucher Date Vendor ' Invoice PO i1 Qescription/Account ' Amount
7951 11l4/2005 000803 AMARO LAW OFFICE INC. 5005 CODE ENFORC. LEGAL SERVICES 18.50
5006 CODE ENFORC. LEGAL SERVICES 219.31
5007 CODE ENFORC. LEGAL SEF2VICES 230.50
. 5010 CODE ENFORC. LEGAL SERVICES 18.50
5011 CODE ENFORC. LEGAL SEI2VICES 999.14
5012 ' CODE ENFORC. LEGAL SERVICES 199.60
5013 CODE ENFORC. LEGAL SERVICES 60.88
. 5014 CODE ENFORC. LEGAL SERVICES 61.30
. 5016 CODE ENFORC. LEGAL SERVICES 26.00
5017 CODE ENFOf2C. LEGAL SERVICES 89.58
5018 CODE ENFORC. LEGAL SERVICES 53.40
5020 COOE ENFORC. LEGAL SERVICES 13.50
5021 ' CODE ENFORC. LEGAL SERVICES 62.00
5022 CODE ENFORC. LEGAL SERVICES 46.37
5023 • CODE ENFORC. LEGAL SERVICES 69.88
5024 CODE'ENFORC. LEGAL SEFtVICES 107.00
5025 CODE ENFORC. LEGAL SERVICES 28.50
. Total : 2,303.96
7952 11/4/2005 000037 AMERICAN LINEN INC. 119863 FLOOR MAT SERVICE 45.34
Tota I : 45.34
7953 11l4l2005 000030 AVISTA UTIUTIES 9QD91047 S7REET POWER LIGHTING CHARG 5,105.93
Total : 5,105.93
7954 11/412005 000944 BENTLEY, NIK 11/3/05 NB Reimb. REIMB. TRAVEUMILEAGE 45.50
Total : 45.50
~
7955 11J4I2005 000918 BLUE F21860N LINEN SUI'I'LY, INC. 8656499 I.INEN SERVICE FOR CENTERPLAC 134.04
8658493 LINEN SERVICE FOR CENTERPLAC 129.34
S0003830 LINEN SERVICE FOR CENTERPI.AC 66.08
' Total : 329.46
7956 11l4/2005 000729 CH2MHILL INC. 3527362 40882 0003 BARKER RD BRIDGE 75&L S7 78,338.94
3528053 40691 0009 - VALLEY CORRIDOR ENV. ST 45,746.86
Total : 124,085.80
• le: 1
~..~i
~1 . ~ ~
vchlist ~ Voucher.List
Page: 2
1110412005 1:46:35PM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank •
Voucher ' Datc Vendor Invoice PO tt DescriptionlAcaount Amount
7957. 11/412005 000840 CLARY, AARON 10/17105 AC Reimb. REIMB. FOR SPRINKLER NEAD 4.32
, Total 4.32
7958 11/4/2005 000284 CRUCIAL TECHNOIOGY INC. 208382047 40778 512 MB RAM FOR HP/COMPAQ D51 65.35
Total : 65.35
7959 11/412005 000136 DEPARTMENT OF INFO SERVICES, STA 2005090236 STATE IT SERVICES 47.65
• Total : 47.65
7960 1114l2005 000685 DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING 11l04/05 DOL Cash CASH TRANSMITTAL TO DOL 28.00
Total : 28.00
7961 1114/2005 000912 pEX MEDIA WEST 300667157 . DEX ADVERTISING-CENTERPLACf 91.25
' Total : 91.25
7962 11l4l2005 000278 D(21SKELL, CARY 10J17/05 CD Reimb. REIMB. FOR TRAVEUMILEAGE 108.64
. 10121105 CD Reimb. TRAINING & Ti2AVEUMILEAGE 452.39
• Total : 561.03
7963 11l4l2005 000246 EAST SPOKANE WATER DIS7#11 02051000 WATER CHARGES 274.43
09006100 WA7ER CHARGES 388.45
09026100 WATER CHARGES 187.26
09066100 WATER CHARGES 431.11
09078100 WATER CHARGES 78.61
, Total : 1,359.86
7964 11/4/2005 000920 ESP PRODUCTIONS 09124l05 Silver 40748 ENTERTAINMENT FOR GRAND OPI 150.00
Total : 150.00
7965 11/4/2005 000106 FEDEX 3-159-81377 SHIPPING CHARGES • 14.51
• Total : 14.51
7966 11/4/2005 000946 GRISSOM, JAY 11f3l05 JG Reimb. REIMB. TRAVEUMILEAGE 45.38
• Total: 45.38
7967 11l4J2005 000002 H & H BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC. 145321 WIDE-FORMAT COPIER PAPER 62.08
Total : 62.08
Page: 2
vchlist . Voucher List Page: 3
11/0412005 1:46:35PM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # QescriptionlAccount Amount
7968 11/4/2005 000942 HEIN, AIMEE 10/31/05 Refund REFUND CENTERPLACE DEPOSIT 130.00
Total : 130.00
7969 1114/20U5 000715 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIOIVS 7003-7311-00134-9347 ' CUPS FOR COFFEE SERVICE A7 C 39.81
Total : 39.81
7970 11/4/2005 000259 HUMANIX INC. 149999 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVI 520.80
Tota I : 520.80
7971 11/4/2005 000070 INLAND POWER AND LIGHT CO 94202-002 STREET POWER LIGHTING CHARC 3426
94202-003 STREET POWER LIGMTIPVG CMARC 49.40
94202-005 • S7REE7 f'OWER LIGHTING CWARC ' 108.86
94202-006 STRE[T POWER LIGHTING CHARC 180.00
Total : 372.52
7972 11/4/2005 000751 INTERIOR DEVELOPMENT EAST INC. 16583 40500 CENTERPLACE FURNITURE 6,510.08
' Total : 6,510.08
7973 11/4/2005 000388 IRVIN WATER DIST. #6 112500.00 WATER CMARGES 165.00
Total : 165.00
7974 11/4/2005 000114 JVH TECHNICAL INC. 10670 40760 COI..OR CAF27RIDGES & PAPER FO 609.06
Total : 609.06
7975 1114/2005 000941 KASPER, MEGAN 10131105 Refund REFUND CENTERPIa4CE DE('OSf'I' 75.5U
Total : 75.50
7976 11/4l2005 000755 LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES 2870 ADVERTISINC 25.00
. Total : 25.00
7977 11/412005 000252 LOWE'S BUSINESS ACCOUNT . 821 3148 018991 4 OPERATING SUPPLIES 10.81
. Tota I : 10.81
7978 11/4l2005 000931 MADSEN MITCHELL EVENSON, & CONR 2005-373 ARCHITECTURAL 8 INTERIOR DES 328.$2
Tota I : 329.82
7979 11/4l2005 000033 MCPC, INC. 4823037 40782 OFFICE SUPPUES 28427
_ Tota I : 284.27
3
Q
vchlist Voucner List Page: 4
1110412005 1:46:35PM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apb2nk
Voucher Oate Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount
7980 11/4/2005 000696 MITEI. NETWORKS, INC., C!O B & C TELI 92285601 40776 MITEL SX200 EUML PRI CARD PAC 1,857.74
Total : 1,857.74
7981 11/412005 000132 MODERN ELECTRIC WATER COMPANY 10l27105 Modern Elec STREET LIGMTING POWERlWATEF 6,993.18
Total : 6,993.18
7982 11/4/2005 0004$4 MOONEY 8 PUGH CON7RACTORS INC. 11I1105 retainage PARTIAL RELEASE OF RETAINAGE 27,365.00
Total : 27,365.00
7983 11l4/2005 000239 NORTHWEST BUSINESS S7AMP INC. 40791 40791 NAME 8 POSITION PLAI'ES 21.69
Total : 21.59
7984 1114/2005 000911 N07E, INGA . 10/17/05 IN Reimb. REIMB. EQUIPMENT PURCHASE 16.99
' Total : 16.99
7985 11/4/2005 000119 PIP PRINTING INC. 1330032194 40804 BLDG.PERMIT AAPROVED S'fICKEI 277.71
13300332180 2 COPIES OF COMP PWN 260.40
Total : 538.11
7986 111412005 000868 POWE12 CITY ELECTRIC CON. INC. 16867 40693 CEN7ERPLACE HEATTf7ACING 4,263.18
16867 40698 CENTERPLACE CIRCUITS 85824
40698
' Total : 5,121.42
7987 11/4/2005 000494 PRO PEOPLE STAFFING SERV INC. 6,739 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMEN7 SERVI 1,077.95
6,740 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVI 565.60
, . • Tota I : 1,643.56
7988 11l4/2005 000019 PURRFECT LOGOS, INC. 14900 CfTY LOGO MAGNE75 FOR RENTA 86.80
Total : 86.80
7989 11/4l2005 000358 REGOR, NINA 10/31/05 NR Reimb. REIMB. FOR 7RAVEL/MILEAGE 85.49
Total : 85.49
7950 11f4/2005 000415 f20SAU[RS U-CITY INC. 579864 MEE'fING SUPPLIES 3.98
Total : 3.98
7991 11/4l2005 000937 ROYAL MOVING, INC. 756 40789 7EKNION TOS REWORK FOR PARh 719.36
I'agc: 4
vchlist Voucher List Page: 5
1110412005 1:46:35PM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO Description/Account Amount
7951 11l4l2005 000937 000937 ROYAL MOVING, WC. (Continued) Toql : 719.36
7952 11l412005 000297 SCHOLTENS, 70M - 10/24f05 75 Reimb. REIMB. SCHQL7ENS TRAVF_UMILE, 188.16
Total : 188.16
7993 11/4/2005 000709 SENSKE LAWN & TREE CAI2E INC. 1248025 MONTHLY CONTRACT PAYMENT 48,777.97
. 1287017 CENT.TRAIL MONTHLY CONTRACT 1,898.75
Total : 50,676.72
7994 11l4/2005 000940 SMITH, pONNA 10131f05 Refund REFUND CEN7ERPLACE DEPOSIT 51.50
Total : 51.50
7995 11/412005 000749 SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DIST., - V 10/17/05 Health Dist WA7ER 7ESTING PROGRAM 168.00
10/17/05 Health Dist WATER 7ESTING PROGRAM 126.00
Total : 244.00
7996 1114/2005 000311 SPRINT PCS 0141276664-3 CELL PHONE CHARGES 1,726.52
Total : 1,726.52
7997 11/4l2005 000773 STUDIO CASCADE, INC. 972 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVI 3,960.00
Total : 3,960.00
7998 11/4!2005 000419 SUMMIT LAW GROUP 27652 GENERAL EMPLOYMENT & LABOR 525.00
Total : 525.00
7999 11l4/2005 000063 TAYLOR, STEVE 10116105 S7 Reimb. REIMk3. TRAVEUMILEAGE 843.19
Total : 843.19
8000 11/4/2005 000516 TETRA TECH/KCM 145457 40617 7ETRA TECH TOP SOIL MIX DESIGI 4,000.00
Total : 4,000.00
8001 11l4l2005 000500 TOSHIBA 150Q371 40758 TABLET PC FOR CENTERPLACE G 440.73
1500371 40758 TABLE7 I'C FOR CENTERPLACE G 1,891.61
40758 ,
• Total : 2,332.34
8002 11/412005 000477 TURBAK, MIKE , 10/17/05 MT Reimb. REIMB. ICC CERTIFICATION COST; 140.00
Total : 140.00
5
vchlist Voucner List Page: 6
1110412005 1:46:35PM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # QescriptionlAccount Amount
8003 11l412005 000167 VERA WATER &'POWER 0016-007780.00 • STREET POWER LIGHTINGNVATEF 20.85
0018-031941.01 STFtEET POWER LIGHTING CHARC 55.40
0018-032752.00 S7REET POWER LIGHTINGlWATEF 18.68
0099-000005.00 STREET POWER LIGHTING CHARC 1,714.40
. Total : 1,809.33
5004 1114/2005 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 0030831-2681-7 WASTE DISPOSAL SERVICE 82.21
1597085-2681-3 WASTE DISPOSAL SERVICE 407.15
Total : 489.36
8005 11/4J2005 000943 WESTERN FORESTRY AND, CONSERVP A0016262 _ REGISTRATION 45.00
Total : 45.00
8006 11/4/2005 000842 WM. WINKLER CO. INC. 059DU-02 40644 CURB REPAIR 737.80
Total : 737.80
56 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 255,690.23
56 Vouchers in this report _ Totai vouchers : 255,690.23
I, the undersigned, do certffy under penatty of perjury,
that the materials have becn furnished, the serVices
rendered, or the labor p:erformed as descnbed herein
and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obtigaSon
against the Ciry of Spokane Valley, and that I am ' authorized to authenticate and cerlify to said cleim. .
Financo Director Date
~ Page: 6
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 11-15-05 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: x consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE :
Payroll for Period Ending October 31, 2005 .
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND:
~ OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
Gross: $130,455.00
Benefits: 67,622.45
. TOTAL PAYROLL: $19$,077.45
STAFF CONTAGT: Jason Faulkner ATTACHMENTS
.
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: November 15, 2005 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: x consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin, report pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Proposed Resolution 05-024 Amending Fee Resolution GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Resolution 05-011 was passed in June of this year
and included updated fees. As the city approaches 2006 there are a few changzs that need to
be incorporated into the fee schedule. The City Council discussed these changes at their
September 20, council meeting and asked that staff meet with developers to discuss these
changes. That meeting was held a few weeks ago. A separate memorandum summarizing that
meeting is attached. Resolution 05-023 was approved at the November 1 council meetirig.
~ BACKGROUND: The city uses a resolution to establish fees for city programs, permits and
services. Periodically, the city must update the fee resolution to incorporate new or modified
fees. The changes needed at this time include:' .
The only change in this resolution is the incorporation of the January 1; 2006 effective
date, which was inadvertently omitted from the previous fee resolution.
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Thompson, Nina Regor
.
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
~ J SPUKA.►~FE COUNTY, WAS1H]NGTO\`
RESOLUTION NO. 05-024
A ItGSULl3TtO\° OF TtU C11 Y OF SYOKANE VAT.,TdFY, SPOK.ANF C()iJiNTY, -
WAS}J=1~1TC10\`, AMFND].17G RESOLiJT10N 05-023, AND Al'1'RUVING AIV
AmENnrn NUAsTElz FLE scxElluLF, _
WI•I.FR.I;AS, this resolution is necessary to amend the efFective date contained in R.esolution 05-
023 to implement necessary fee changes effecCive January l, 2006; and WI-ITREAS, it is the general policy of the City to establish fees that are retlective of the cost of
services pro<<ided by the City; and
WI-IE12EAS, the City uses a resolution co establish fecs for City proarams, permits and services;
ancl pe.riodically, the fee resolution must be updated tn ineorpoiate new or moclifed services; and
WHERFAS, Couocil de.sires to modify the Resolution and accompanying ~'ee Schedule.
NUW '1'1-lEREl'OKE, be it resolved by the Cily Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane
Count,y, Washington, as f'ollows: . Section 1. The changes needed at this tiine are incorporated into the attachccl schedules, and include (1)
ldditinn of a sepriraCe tr.inscriptlrecord deposit fee on appeals of the Hearing Examiner's decisions as
established in Ordinance 05-021; (2) addition of a$250 paving permiC fee; (3) Plan Revicw Fees to. be
0 paid at the time oi' permit issuance; (4) the approach pei-init fee and the right of way obstructinn Fee were
moved from another section of the resolution; (5) the deletion of aS10 fee for a eopy of an annual
budget; (6) adjusting the acmual Storm water fee to $20/equivalent residential unit based on the sis-year
plan; (7) incorpoeating soiue public works fees into existing permit fees (no inerease in ihe amount
owed by users); (3) ilie addition of an oversized load permic fec of $25; (9) changes to fire district fees;
and (10) the additiorl of'a blasting permit fee of $60.00.
Section 2. Repeal. To the extent that previous fee schedules are ineonsistent with t:hose set
forth herein, they are repealed. . Section 3. Fffective Taatc. Tliis Resolution shall be in full force and effect .ianuary 1, 2006.
Approveci this day ofNovember, 2005
A'CTEST: CITY OF SPOKANF Vr1T.,LF_Y
Christirie Tiainbridge, Ciry Clerk Diana Wilhite, `layor Approvect as to form:
Office of the City Attorney _
J .
AIViENiqDED MASfiER FEF, SC:HEDUI~:t+: ~
Fee Schedule Page No.
Schedule A: Development 3
Schedule :B: 13uilding 5_
Schedule C: Fire Code 13
Schedule A: Farks & :l.tecrcation 16
Schedulc E: Administrative 1.9
Schedule F: Other Fces 20
. 0
;
Fee Resolution 05-024 Page 2 of 20
! ~ . 1'lAST.f R FEE SCHEll ULE
-fSchedule A - DEVELUPMENT
AbLT!;\j17N1ENTS ' .
Comprehcnsive Plan amendment $1,500.00
Zoning or other code text iiinendment $1-,500.00
APPEAL-S Appeal of Administrative Decision $1,000.00
Appe{11 of I-Iearing Fxaminer findings $300.00
TranscripUrecord deposit fee on appeals of Hearing $150.00
E:caminer's decisions
L\'VIKUNMENTAL REVIE`V
State .F..nviroomental Yolicy Act (SFPA)
Sirigle dwelling (when required) $100.00
All other developmenTS $350.00
13nvironmental lmpact Statement (EIS) Review $2,200.00
,Addencta oFexisting EIS Review S350.00
~ Shorclinc
Substantial iacvelopment Yemiit $800.00 .
Critical Areas $300.00
Floodplain Pcrmic $50.00 Yer lot
PERAZ11'S
Homc Oeeupalion 1'ennit $80.00
Conditional Use Perrnit $800.00
Temporary Use Pemi it $150.00 PT.,ATS . '
Subdivisions
Prelicninary pl.il $2,150.00 Plus $40.00 per lot
Pinal plat $1;250.00 Plus $10.00 per lnt
Short Plats
Preliminary 2-4 lats $750.00
Pinal Plat 2-41:1ots S1,050.00 Plus S10.00 per lot
Preliminary plat 5-9 Lots S1,250.00 Plus $25.00 per lot
Fuial Plal 5-9 Lots $1;050.00 Plus $10.00 per lot
Fee Resohrtion 05-024 Page 3 of 20 '
Plat Alter<ition
Subdivision plat $650.00 Short plat $265.00 •
Binding Site Plan $ I,500.00
113inding site plan modification $1,300.00
Change of Conditions $650.00
Aggregatipn/Segrebation
Lot line adjusfiient $100.00
[ ot line climination $100.00 "
'Gero lot line $100.00 Flus $10.00 per lot
SiGNS
Review of permanent sign $50.00 Plus $25.00 ifPublic
Works reviEw is
needed
Review of temporary sign $50.00
Sl'1'E I'LAN RCV"IE VV $550.00
STREE1' VACr1TIQN APFI.,TCATiON $1,3100.00 '
VARTANCES
Administrative $300.00
Public Hearings $1,500.00
ZQNIiNG
"Loning map amendments (rezone)* $1,650.00
FUD plan $1,500.00 Plus $25.00 per lol
PUD modification $500.00
#If rezone is combined with other action(s), cost of other
action(s) is additional.
Note': "fhe Buildin; Offieial is a_utliorized to rcquirc the permit applica.nt to provide fce
reiinbiirsement to. thc City of Spokane Valley :for a.ny professional senrices requireci ouLside of
City staf.C review. Soine esainples of potcntial outside resources include plaii review,
construction inspection and stuvEying. . ' _
~
. ~ ,
Fee R.esolution 05-024 . Page 4 of 20
Schedule B -:FiULAlNG
The building code Permit fees are collectecl at the tune of thc issuance of thc building permit.
Qthe.r fees are also to be collected at thc time of thc issuing of the building permil. Fach
departuient for whom the fee is collccted is to aclvise the permie specialist of fees due.
GRAnTNC
Permit Hees
Cubic Yards FFF
100 or less $20.00
101 to 1,000 $20.00 for thc first 100 Cu. Yd., plus $7.001'or each
additional 100 Cu. Yd.
1;001 to 10,000 $83.00 t'or the first 1,001 Cu. Yd., plus $6.00 for each
additional 1,000 Cu. Yd.
10,001 to 100,000 S147.00 for the first 10,000 Cu. Yd. plus $15.00 for
. each additional 10,000 Cu. Yd.
106,001 to 200,000 $3G8.Q0 f'or the lirst 100,000 Cu. Yd, plus $15.00 for '
each acidiCional 100,000 Cu. Yd.
200,000 or more $503.00 for the iirsl 200,000 Cu. Yd. plus $15.00 f.or
each aciditional 200,000 Cu. Xd.
Blaiting Perniit Fee (I_:ife Sa:fety) $60
~
Plans Chccl:ing Fces
Cubic Yards FFF 50 or less No fee 51 to 100 $12.00 .
101 to 1,000 $20.00 .
1,001 to 10;000 $25.00
10;001 to 100,000 $25.00.f.or the fi.rst 10,000 Cu. ZTd. plus $7.00 for
each additional 10,000 Cu. Yd.
100,001 to 200,000 $98.00 for the first 100,000 Cu. Yd. plus $6.00 for
each additional 100,000 Cu. Yd.
200,001 or more $158.00
T.,and Clearing only (withuut earth bcing movcd) $65.00
Fa~irig Fermit (greater than 5,000 SF - new paving onl,y) S250.00 .
i
Fee Resqlution 05-024 ' , Pa;e 5 of 20
STRUCI URAL COllL
Biulding peruut fees for each prnject ai•e set by the following fee schedule. The table below is to
bc uscd to deterinuie the building permit fees and plans chcck fees based on the value of the
construction work as stated by the applicant o1- the value calculated by the Building Official
using the latest valuation data published in the B7silding SafetyJcrarrnal by the International Code
Council, whichever valuc is greztest.
Valuation Table
Tntal Valuation l+ee
$1 to $25,000 $69.25 for the .first $2,000 plus $14 fol- each adciitipnal
$1,000, or fi•actioii thereof, up to and including $25,000
525,001 to $50,000 $391.25 for the first $25;000 plus $10.10 for cach
additional $1.,000, ar f:raction thereof, up to anci
including $50,000
$50,001 to $100,000 $643.75 for the first $50,000 plus $7 for eacli
ldditional $1,000, or fraction thereof, up to and
including $100,000
. S100,001 to $500,000 $993.75 for the first $100,000 plus $5.60 for each
aciditional $1,000, or fraction thereof, up to and
includiug $500,000 '
$500,001. ta $1,000,000 $3,233.75 for the first $500,000 plus $4.75 for each .
adclitional $1,000, or fraction t;herenf; up to anci ; -
1I1ClUdltlb $1,000,000
$1,000;000 and up 55,608.75 for the first $1,000,000 plus $3.15 for each
additional $1,000, or fraction thcrcof
V:iluation EYCeptions Fee Per
Square Foot
Private garages (wood frauie) $19_00
Private garabes (masoiu•y) $22.00
Pole buildings $19.00
Qpen carport, decks, porches $15.00
Plans Review Fees
1'lai Review Fees sliall be collected at the time of permit issuarice along Nvitli the WSBC fee. For other than signs, one and t,.vo family residential stivchires and the associated accessnry
buildings or stnichires, a Plans Review Fee Deposit of $200 shall be collecled at the lime of
acceptance of the Building Perrnit Application. `1 he applicatioii shall be accepted ocily when the
application is detennined to be complete by City staff:
Fee Resolution 05-024 ' Page 6 of 20
~ FAr signs, vne and ttwo faituly resictcntial strijctures anci the associated accessory buildings or
struct«res, no plan review depUsit will be required at the tilne of Builciing Pcrmit Application
subr»ittal.
The balance of the Plan Review Fce shall be collected at the time of Building Permit issuance
along -with thc WS13CC Fec. Any excess cieposil collecled during the applicati.on prncess shall
bc applicd to the Building Permit Nee.
Plans R.eview rees are not refundable once the plan review has bccn startcd. Plans Review Fces
ar.e additional to l'3uilding Yeruut lyees.
Plans review fee (gencral) 65% Of bldg permit fee
Plaos review fee - Group K-3 occupvncies (single fainily 40% Of bldg permit fee
less than 7,999 sq. ft.) Plans review fee - Group R-3 occupancies (single family fiS% Of bidg perrnit fee
5,000 sq. ft. or greater)
Flans review fee - U-1 or U-2 occupancies (shcds, barns, 25% Of bldg permit fee
et:e.)
Plans review fiec - temnorary tent or scruc;lure 25% Of bldg permit fee
. hiitial Plaii Review rees shall be ca.pped at $35;000 maximtun with the following exception:
~ Exception # 1:
lf additional professional resourccs are requireci for individual project plan review t'or those
projects lhal reaeh lhe maximum Plan Review Fee, the Building Official shall be authorized to
require tlie perinit applicant to provide ttiose resolirccs to thc• City of Spokane Valley. If a set of plans already checked and approved is resubiiiitted by the oxvner or his/lier agent, an
hourly rate of $47.00 will be applied for the re-review.
PifUiNil3ING COllL
The plumbiug code fees will be collected tivtlen the associated permit is issued. If the plumbing is
included in the Build'uig Yernut ttie utut costs are added, but not the basic plumbing Permit fee.
A. T:3asic fces 1) Basic fee for issuino, each permit . $35.00
2) $a,sie for each supplemenu►l permit $7.50
B. Unit fees (in a(ldition to the basic fee)
1) For eacla_ plumbing fixture on a trap (inclu(iing $6.00
garbage disposals; dish washers, back flaw device,
drainage, hot tubs, bui lt in water softener, water closets, lavatories, sinks, drains, etc )
2) Private sewage disposal system $20.00
3) Water heater $6.00 Eaeh '
4) Industrial waste preh•eatment interceptor including S15.00
Fee Resohifion 05-024 Page 7 of 20
its trap and vent, cxcept kitchen type grease
interceplors functioning as fixture b-aps.
5) Repair or alteration of water piping, drainage or $6.00 Each fiYture `
vent pipiog
6) Lawm sprinkler system on any one meter _ $25.00
7) Atmospherie Cype vacuimi breaker $6.00 rach
8) Bael:flow protecCive device other than atniospheric $6.00 Each
type vat;uum larea.kers
9) Medical gas $6.00 Per outlet
] 0) Interceptors ' $6.00 . Each
~
- , ,
Fec Resolution 05-024 F'age 8 bf 20
1V1ECHANICAL CODE
The rnechanical cade fees vvill be collected -,uhen the associatcd pemut is issued. If it is included
iu ihe Building Permit, the unit costs are added, but not the basic mechanical permit fes. A. Basic fees
1) Basic fee for issuing each permit • $35.00
2) I3asic for each supplemental permit $7.50
B. Unit fees (in addition to the basic fce)
1) rurnaces & suspen(led heaters - Installation or '
relocation
a. up to and inetuding 100,000 btu $12A0
b. over 100,000 btu $15.00 2) Duct wark system $10.00
3) Heat pump & air conditioner
a. 0 to 3 tons $12.00
b. aver 3 to 15 tons S20.00
c. over 15 to 30 tons $25.00
d. over 30 to SO tons S35.00
c. over 50 lons $60.00
4) Gas water heater $10.00
5) Gas pipinj systeni _ $1.00 Per outlet
6) Gas log, fueplace, iiIld g1S lI1S81't lllStrlllAtlAll $1 0.00
7) Applisnce vents inst.alla[ion; relocalion; replacement . $10.00 Lach
~ J 8) Repairs or additions $15.00
9} $oilers, compressors, and absorption systems
a, 0 to 3 hp - 100,000 btu or less $12.00
b. Ovcr 3 to 15 hp - 100,00 1 to 500,000 btu $20.00
c. qver 15 - 30 hp - 500,001 to 1,000,000 btu $25.00
d. over 30 hp - 1,000,001 to 1,750,000 btu $35.00
e. over SO hp - over. 1,750,000 btu $60.00
lU) Air Handlers
a. Fach unit up to 10,000 cfm, includiiig ducts $12.00
b. Lach tuut ovcr 10,000 cfm $15.00
11) Evaporative Coolers (othcr than portable) $10.00
12) Ventilation and cYhaust
a. Lach fan connectecl to a single duct $10.00
b. ach ventilation system $12.00
c. Each hood servecl by mechanical exhaust $12.00
li) Incinerat4rs
a. instaUatien or relncatinn of residential $19.00
b. Installatioii or relocation of commercial $22.00
14) Appliances, eac:h ' $10.00
15) Unlisted appliances
a. under 400,000 btu' $50.00
b. 400,000 btu or over . $100.00
~ee Resolution 05-024 F'age 9 of 20
~
16) T-load . i
- a. Type I $50.00 ,
b. I ype Il $10,00
17) L, P Storagc tank $10.00
18) Wood or Pellct stove insert $10.00
19) Wood stove system - free star►cling $25.00
LiYFL1ZGY CUllE
Fnergy Code Plans check fee is also established to cheek to meet tlie requireinents of 1ZCW 51-
11 WAC. These are in additiou to the Building Code Fees. Tf City inspectors are assigned t4
veaify Fnerg}~ Plans, the following fees.apply. 1f an autside energy inspector is required, that f:ee
will be deteriuiued by the outside agency.
ResidEntial Remodel/Aciditinn $ -0- New Single Family $ _p_
1'enant Irnproverncnt
A. 0 to 10,000 square fieet $35.00
B. 10,001 squarE fcet and over $45.00
C. Multi-1^amily $60.00 Per building
D. - New Commercial and industrial $90.00
OTH..FR RUILUIiNG CUllE FEES
Annual Yermit
Aruiual Spokane Valley Builciing Pemiits used fo: l) mauntain equipment.or buildings, 2) constnict or remodcl small areas pf a,.ssembly occupancics, or
3) install lents ar membraiie stnictures
may be available depending upon the dctcrmination of the valuation of work made by the
SPnkane Valley F3uilcling Official. Ccriain rec4rd keeping and 'uispection responsibilities shall
be est3blished i_n a site specitic Spolcane Valley Amnual Permit Agreenlent. .
Approach Permit $50.00 , -
Demolition Permit
Single Family Itesidence $44.00
Cummercial builtli.ngs $125.00
Garage or ttccessory building associated widi a residence or $20.00
commercial builcling
Septic tank ar undergroLind flammable•tank associated with S 10.00 Each
a residence or com.mercial building
E.trly Start Agreements (Foundations) 25% Of bldg permit fee
Fee R.esolution 05-024 Page 10 of 20
Right-of-`Vay Qbstruction Permit $70.00
\ J.
Sign Fees
Fees collected for a sign pemut aiid a plans check fee for signs ereeted in accordancc with the
Sigii Code. 'T'he fee below plus the WSBCC fee of $4.50.
Signs mounted on buildings $45.00
Sign and polc moumti.ng $65.00
Ternporary Cerkificatc of Occupancy $50,00 Washington State Building Code Council (NV.S.I3.C.C.) Surchxrgc
A f'lat fee of 54.50 will be collected on each permii for approved plans or any other pemut ttiat is
issued 'ui accordance with the Spokane Valley Buildiug Code. FXCFPT: For mtilti-family
projects, the fee is $4.50 for the first living unit atid $2.00 for each additional tmit. The City
Finance Departmenovill fortivard this fee to tlie VVS13CC on a quarterly basis.
OTHER 1Vf.ISCE_L.LANEOUS FEFS A. For City personuel ~J 1) IIourly rate set for City Employces (unless $47.00
othenvise specifed)
2) Hourly rate for permit specialist $42.00
3) Overtune chargcs 1.5 times regular rat:e
B. T-Totxrly rate for contraeted sen~ices Set accorciing co
cOnUact rate
C. Hourly rate for spccial called 'uispections $47.00
D. Mobile home loeation pennit and inspection
t) '1'emporary mobile hocne $60.00
2) Nlanufactured home inspection, per section ,S50.00 #
E. House Moving Fee
1) Class 1, Il; and [II -M.ovuig perinit $60.00
2) Class I, Il, and TTI - Itispection fcc $60.00
3) Class N(if already periiiittcd by Spokane $-p-
County or Spok:-ine City) Plu.s basefneni/craWspuce vuluatiorrperaiit fee
**.Plus S47. 00 per hoau• uf1er• !he 1 S' hour, und S. SO per• mile rf the bz.rilding !o be rnoved into the
Crty is out.sitle tFre City limits
.
Fce }tesolution 05-024 Paoe 11 of20
1'. vlinimum Housing Inspection:fee ' $55.00 Plus $47.00 per hour ` J
afier 1" hour
G. `Vork on any slruccure or buildiug without a pennit if
a Spokane Valley Permit is required:
1) Minimum inveseigative inspection .fee $55.00
2) Total investigative fee to be equal to ttle perrnit fee detc;rroine(i for the value of the illegal
work aec:omplished
M. Special inspections (requested by owier or tenant)
1)- Fire, wind, mud slicie or flood damage $60.00
2) T)ay Care $60.00
3) Nursu~g Homes, hospitals, et al $60.00 Plus $ 47.00 per
hnur after 1 st hour
. 4) SpecialOccupancies $60.00 •
i. Fxcess uispections for agiven project crcatcd by The $47.00 Per inspection or re-
developer, o«rner or contractor inspection
J. Condomuuum conversion plans review/inspectiUn fee }3ased on value nf
project snd bldg
code valualion
K. 1'emporary tcnts; canopies, ancl air tupPorted skructures for public usc; inclusive oF all
tents for a single evcnt It cioes not apply to tents less thau 200 sq. ft., canopies less than
400 sq ft, campinc, tents, or to lenCS used for private, non comrncrcial cvcnts. 1) Plans check fee $ ] 3.00
Basic pernut fee $60.00
~
L. Cuclosing an cxisting deck or patio _
Plani eheck f.'ee 40% Of the basic fee for
plans examination
2) Basic permit fee Based on value of
project; minimum
. $3;000 M. Swiiziming poals (Over 5,000 gallons) $50.00 Plus plumbing Pees
N. Re-roof Pem»it: Pee baseci ou tlie valuc of the projecT. 'Nlo plan review fee will be charged unless
plans are submittccl for review. .
0. Change of Use or Occupaney Classifieation permit $47.00
P. "1'owers; elcvatcd tanks, antennas Based on value of
' project
. suri..ni:Nc: cOnF Vur .RF.Fun7n PoL:icY
No Permit Fee refund is allowcd once the work has been started. If a refund is requestcd, the
request shall be addressed tn the J3uilding Official in writin;, and shall be received at the
Spokane Valley Permit Center ATithin 180 days of the date of issuance of the pernut. Any fee
refunci request received after 180 days of the date of periiiit issuance shall bE denied. Any refund
approved shall be limiteci to $U% o:C [he CaCal Permit Fee paid. Refiulds shalf be limited to
Buildula, Plumbuib and Mechaiucal Permit fces paid to thc City of Spokane Valley.
~
Tee Resoluiion 05-024 page 12 of20
Scheclule C- FT_RE CO[)E
~ .J 1±112F ALARiNI, SPRlN'Klal.401 AnTD OTFCER PROTEC'l'l.Olv SYSTEMS Plans check and revicw fees, inspections, and pcruiit for uistallalion af sEparate fire alarni syslem
or sprinkler system applications, and nkher fire Protection systems.
Fire Alarm Systcni
A. Conunercial - permit, plans check and inspection Baseei on value of
system
B. Residential
1) All zones $40.00
2) Pcrmit fee $35.00
Spriukler Systcma
A. Tenant improvemcnts
1) T,ess than 10 hcads $65.00
2) 11 or more heads $85.00
B. New systems
1) Commercial - permit, platis check and Based on value of
inspection - system
2) Residential $60.00 Each riser, plus $1.10
pcr plug/head
nther Protection Systcros
A. Fire-extinguishing system (otller than spr.inklers) $50.00 P1us S 1.50 per nozzle
B. Standpipe installation
1) Class I anci Cla.ss II $58.00
2) Class III $70.00 ,
C. l;ire pump ulstallation $55.00 '
D. 1"lanunable a.nd combustible liquids storage taaks .
installation
l ) Undcroround $60.00 1'er Lznk
2) Above grotuid $60.00 Per tank
E. Hazardous materials storagc tanks installatian Per tank
1) T ess than 500 gallons $75.00 •
2) 500 - 1,199 gallons $104.00
3) 1,200 gallons or more $147•00
' •
L. ~ 1'ee Resolution 05-024 . Yaee 13 of 20
. F. LiquefiEd petrpleum taliks ins[allation Per tank ~1) T.,ess than 500 gallons $84.00
2) 500 - 9;999 gallons $104.00
3) 10,000 gallons or more $147.00
G. Ciyogenic tank installation $60.00 1'er tank
H. Removal, abandonmcnt, or any combination thereof,
of flammable or cambustible liquid storage tank:s
I ) Taril: (coinmercial) . $60.00 Per tank
2) Contractqr's periiut for removal or • $75.00
abandonment of residential uuder-ground fiicl
tanlcs
1. Fire Departrnent tee fnr inspections and follow up. For init:ial inspection, plans check and follow
up inspections as called for in eht Firc, Code and perforrrmed by the fire clepartment_the fire
deparlmcnt will be paid.65% of the fee collecCed f.'or the pernliC. This payment will be paid
quarterly.
FLItE, FAJ~SF ALARlVI F"EES The follo~~~ing fees are set for repeated malfiinct;ioning'false alamts in a given siY monlh period.
First alarrn \~o charce
Second alarm S30.00 '
"I'hird tilarin $70.00
EourtJi alarm , $120.00
rifi:h and subsequent alarrns t2.equire a hired fire
watch .
f ire watch service , $180.00 3 hour min. plus
hourly ttiereafter
N LftEWORKS
Yublic display fee* $100.00 Maximum per RCW
70.77
*4IJ'0 i'equlYGS u peiformance hond or cash depGSit of S500.04 for elean up purposes and a
(.iabiliry irrsarrtrnce policy vf S1, 000, 000.00.
YERIVIITS .
A. Conditional Use Perrnit $60.00
B. Demolition Permit $120.00
C. Tetnporary Use Pernl it $60.00
D. Tents/Canopy Perrnit Hourly Rate
1
Fee Rcsalucion 05-024 Pzge 14 of 20
.l']..E1NS CHF.CK AN.I:) RE.VIFW RX i'HE BiIREAU OF !+~1RE PRFVF•N'1'IUN
A. New commercial plans check and inspection (for projects $60.00 '
not men[ioned else~vhere)
B. Hourly rate $60.00 .
C. After hour inspcetions, plvns review, consultittions for 1.5 times regular rate
pr4jeets that do not require a permit, atld other special
services
PI.,ATS A. Subdivision/I'U17
• 1) Prel'tminary $120.00
2) Fuul $60.00
3) Alteration $60.00
B. Shorl Plat
1) Preliaunary S120.00
2) Fi.nal $60.00
3) Alteration $60.00
SPEC1AL INSPECTiONS
A. Day Care $60.00
~ B. rirc.Damage $120.00
G. vursing (iomelHospital for licensing $180.00
~ ~ -
Fec Kesolution 05-024 Pa;e 15 of 20
Schedule D - pA'RKS & RECREATION
ADMINTSTRA'I'fV:l! lTEl:S
Fiasic .f.ees to bc considerecl when applying rates
Administrative Fee $30.00
Refuse Fee $50.00
AQUA'TiCS -
Pool admission (age 5 and under) free
Pool admission (age older than 5) $1.00
1'00l punch pass (25 swims) $20.00
. Weekend f'amify discount . 1 child under 13 free wiCh paying adult
Reservatian (less than 50 people) $100.00 Per hour*
Fond fee (if applicaUle) $25.00 '
Reservation (50 - 100 People) $125.00 Per hour*
Food fee (if applicable) • S50.00
Reservation ( l 0l - 150 people) S 150.00` Per hour"'
Focrd fee (if applicable) $75.00
. *Afinimurr2 2 hour.s .
_ i
ALCOHOLTC BLVL1tAGE PE1t1VIIT
Alcoholic Beveesge Permit Fee $10.00 ,
cLNTEx.PLAcE - Cbnference Center V1Wing .
Auditorium $75.00 Per hour
Auditnriuin $450.00 Per day
Auditorium $225.00 Per half day
Auditorium w/Presentatioti Sys[ern $50.00 Per hour
Auditorium w/Aresentatiqn System $300.00 Per day
Auditorium w/Present.ilion System $150.00 Per half day
Auditarium I7eposit $50.00
Erecutive Conference f'Zoom $50.00 Fer hour
F.xecutive Conference Room Deposit $50.00
vleeting R.oom (Day & Evening Use) $40.00 Per hour
Vleetin(y R.oom $250.00 Per day Meetinc, Room $125.00 Per half clay
Mecting Room Deposit $50.00
Fee Resolutiou 05-024 Page 16 of20
~ Great Rooni Kitchcn w/Din-ing Room Rental $100.00 Per use
Kitchen - Commercill Use (2 hour min.) $50.00 Per hpur
Kitchen Deposit $50.00
Multi-Use/Banquet Hall $100.00 Per hour Multi-Use/Banquet I-lall . $500.00 9 hr session
Vlulti-Use/BanquetHalJ $1,500A0 Allday(6am-lam)
Small Dining E1rea . $50.00 Per hour
L7eposit S200.00 .
Stage $20.00 Per seccion per day
Table Sectings (linens & tableware) $2.00 Per place setting Seninr Ccnter Wing ,
Lounge with Danae rloor $100.00 1'er hour
Loungc with Dijnce Flnor $800.00 Per day
Loiuige Deposit $200.00
Meeting R.oom (Eveninb Use) $40.00 Per hour Meeting Koom (Evening Use) $125.00 4 hr session
Meeting R.oont (`Veekend Use) $250.00 Per day
vicet'ing ltoom (Weekend Use) $125.00 Per half clay
Mceting Room Deposit _ $50.00
1'rivate Dining RQorri $50.00 Per hour
Private llining lZoom Deposit $50.00
Wellne,cs Center . $100.00 Per hour .
~ Misccllaneous
Cleanup f'ee $50-300 Per event
HqstlHpstess (after hours) $15.00 Per hour .
Fresentation System (ineludes projectorJpodium/ $250.00 Per day
17Vi7/VCIt/sound systcm/camcra systeni)
Room Setup $25.00 Per hour Satellite Video Conferencing . S250.00 Per hour
Sound System. $40.00 Per day
`I'echnical SupporC $40.00 Per hour '
lelevision/VCR $75.00 Per ckiy
"I ouch Yad Voting System $115.00 Base station pCr day +S 15.00 Per heypad per day L"VEn`TS = includes Pavilion •
Fvertts include but arc not limited to activities such as car shows, tournaments and activities
involving 200 or morc pcople. The Tairector of Parks and Recreaeion will make tlle final
deterniuiation.
General Fee $150.00
Non-profit applicatinns $30.00 Qr free witli
sponsorship*
*Applicatiarufor joint .sponsorshrp tivlth the City of Spokane Tjalley ivill be c( insitleretl by the
--1 Spokune Valley.Parks• Departrnent.
~J
Pee Resoluiion 05-024 Page 17 of 20
1+IL:L:D 12LN°1 AL
Use ree $25.00 Pirst hour plus $15 , j
each additional hour
INllUOK USE
Open gym admission $2.00
Playground nrogram adrnission (10 entries) $20.00
MIRABEAU
Mirabeau SprinQs
Small shcltcr and waterfall $150.00 Vlaximum 4 hours
Reftindable deposit (le_ss than 200 people) $50.00
vlirabeau Meatlc»vs 5helter (less d1an 200 people) $80.00
Slielter (200 or morc people) $150.00
Reftindable deposit (less than 200 people) $50.00
Rcfunclable deposiC (200 or more penple_) $250.00
PTCNiC S_Hl~'.LTTIZS
Picnic Shelter (less than 200 people) $30.00
Picnic Shelter (200 or more people) S 150.00
Reftindable deposit (less than 200 people) $50.00
Reftindable deposit (200 or more people) S250.00
PROFE SSIOT'AL PI-IOTOGItAI'1TY
E'errnil fee $25.00 Annual
RFCREATiON Rccreation program fees fu-e sEt to recover costs as specifiecl in the Parks and Recreation revenue
policy. •
VA.I..I.1EY KTSS10N 21WFNA ,
Rental * $100.00 Per weelcend
f7efundable deposit $50.00
*Renter respon,sible for orr-site prepcej•ativn. Rental r•equiYes liability irz,surance.
.
Fee Resolutiori 05-024 Paoe I S of 20
~ CQPY FEES Schedule E - ADVI:1NI.STRATI:VF
Copy of auclio tapes, vicleo tApes, phqtos, maps Ur ol:her At cost
records neecting reproduetion . '
Copy of written records $0.15 Per pape
Copy of full docunlents ' At cost
OTAER ADNI]NISTRATNE FEES
NSF Check $25.00
~ ' .
~ -
Fee Resolutipn 05-024 - Page, 19 of 20
Schedulc F - OTHER FEES %
. . ~
ADULT ENTEIZTAIi\TM_7,NT FFFS
L+"stablishment Taicenses
T ive A.dult Entertainment ' $1,500.00
Adult Arcade $1,500.00
Qther Adult Entertqinment Licenses Adult Arcade Device License $150.00
. 1Nianager T.,icense $1 50.00
Entertainer l..icense $150.00
Lxte License Fee - C}iarged in addition to license fee.
Percent of
Past Due Calendar Days License I'ee
• 7 - 30 25%
31 - 60 SO"/o
61 and ovee 75%
BUSIlvESS ItEGISTIZATTO\` FEE5
Business registration $13 each year
i\TOnprof t reSist:racion $ 3 eaeh year
SECURiTY FAi,.SF AL1RM FEES
Repeated malfunctioning secuuiCy Fiilse alarms in a given six-►nonth period.
First alarm \to charge
Seconcl alarrn $30.00 Third alarm $70.00
Fourth and subsequent alarms $120.00
ST(71711•1 WA'1'l;tt U'1"Ml.TY CFTARGE QN DEVELOPED 1'A12CLLS
Each single-family unit each yetir 20.00
All other prnperties each ycar 20.00 1'er 3,160 square feet
af impervious surface
'1'OW OPLRATOR A.~\TNUAi. R,FGISTRA'CION 1+EE $100.00
OVERSIZED LOA.D P1-.-.R3M 11' FEE $25.00
Fec Rcsolution 05-024 Pagc 20 of20
laraft
M_1NLJTF S
~ J City of Spokane Valley
City Council Rcgulsr AIceting
. Tuesday, nctotier 25, 2005
Mayor WilMite called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m., and welcomed everyone to the 77 meeting
Atteirdarlce: Cily Sluff.•
]aiana Wilhite, Mayor Nina Regor, DEputy City Mandger
Rich Munson, Ueputy Nlayor Ivlilce Con.nelly, City Attorncy
Dick Uenenny, Councilmembcr Ken Thompson, Finance Director
Mike DeVleming, Councilmember Mike Jackson, Yuks & RecreaCion Director
Mike Flanigan, Councilmember Tom Scholtens, T3uilding Official
Gary Schimrnels, Councilmeinber C;arolbelle f3ranch, Yublic Infonnation Offic;er
Steve Taylor, Cauncilmember Tieil Kerstcn, Public Works Director,
Greg V1cConnick, Ylamling Nlanager Scott Kuhta, Senior Planner
Marina Sukup; Community Uevelopment 17irector
"Bing" Greg Bingaman, IT Specialist Chris BaiiibridDc, City Clerk
Ii TVOCaTION: Pastor .T.e.c Hunt of New •N.one Christian Center gave dle invocatian.
YT,F-T)CF OF A]:.T.,FGT.aNCF: Mayor Wilhite Icd the Plcdoe ofi Allegiance.
~ RQLI,. CAT..T..: City Clerk Bainbridge called rqll; all Councilnnembers were present.
AFFRQVAL Qr AGE\'DA It was ntoved by Courrcilmenrber Tcrylor, secorrded hy CouncilrnernGer
Flanigan, arrd tarm:imausly agreecf upor:la apprave the ugerrda as preserztetl.
INTRQDiJCTiON nF SPFCIAT.. GUTSTS AN]) PR.F,SENTATTONS:
COMMCT IEE, BOAFZU, LIAISON SUNTiti-1AEtY REYO1Z`i S:
Councilmember Flanigan mentionerl that he attended the Spol:ane Valley Chamber Tourism Corninittec
meeting, and ehe Valley Chamber monrhty meeting. Councilmember llenenny reported that the
wastewater clischargers met last Wednesday to put tonEtljcr scenarios to present to the Department af
Ecolngy.
i~~~AXUR'S 12:NFOl't"i : '
Nlayor Wilhite reported that she attended an Economic Iaevelopment Council meeting; went Co West
Valley High School's groundbre,al:ing; and she wil] be speaking nn an upcoming KBPX radio show
broadcast conceming the Comprehensive Plan. U(ayor Williite also mentianed she and other
councilmembers attencled an tlssoeiation oF 4Vashington Cities' regional meeting in Spokane.
PUF3LIC CO`U1IENTS: Mayor Wilhite invitecj public comment.
T)ick T3ehm, 3626 S RidQeview Drive: said he wqnted to take the oppertunity to thank d1e members of the
Planning Commission for their volunteerism and dedication to pultinb tagether the draft Comprehensive
Plan.
-
Mara<iret Caciwallader, 1119 E 26'h: she said also wanted to recognize council's hard work especially that
which was done in the farmative years, and to thank former Mayor CaeVlcming, currenl Mayor Wilhite,
Council Meeting: 10-25-05 }'agc 1 of 11
Approved by Council:
T)raft
and all cnuncilmembers for their accomplishmencs; and that she appreciates the constant invitations to
citizens to seck ciiizen input. ;
~
i.,cn T3oiaae, 304 S Conklin Koad. Spokane Valley: he echoed the sentiments o£ rivo previous spe<ilcers;
and thanked council for their detlication; he said that last October 12 he gave a letter at the CenterPlace
meel:ing; that he has tnore letters for the Planning Commissioners and others, and he ative lhose letters to
the Clcrk f'or clistribut:ion; t:hat his issue is a zoning issue in ihc Ponderosa and not being permitted a shart
plat that he wants fQr retirement purposes. He mentioned he will be out of town for about a month, but
that he can be contacted via e-mail. '
Rick Hansen, 15909 E 23`dCourt: he read his letter into the recard and gave a cony to thc Clerk; his letter
is about growth and fiuturc clevelopments; and that he wants lcaders fo strike a balance behvicen
cievelopers tind citizens' desire; and star.ed that dEVelopers need to examinc the totiil plan and total long
term impact; and that to object to all gro«rth is not a solution. He said that he believe.s the goals and
policies are a good start but that balance is needed.
1. PUI3i.,.T.C HEARING: 2°d Yublic Hearing, Comprehensive Plan Draft
IN4ayor Wilhite npened the public ticaring at 6:19 p.m. and invitecl comments conceiming the
Comprehensive Plan Taraf't.
Doag Kellcy, 1411 F Mission, Spok.vne: spoke on behalf of Avista and thankcd Caumcil for the
opportuniCy to provide comment qn the inicial Cnmprehensive Plan. He said there are a c.ouplc of policies
he woutd like to rnakc comment an and they are out of chapter siY, the Utilities Chapler. The first is PiJP
3.5 pertaining to the mandatory undergrounding of utilities, and one narticular element in there that he did
not recall seeing last tirne, was that the element refers to underground facilities in siipiificantly
reconstructed facilities. E-ie asked for tlie defnition of a"significantly reconstructed facility." Secontlly,
according to dhis policy, he said yrou would be rnandaCing their existing scrvice if it is overhead to (To
unclerground; and he will refer in his neat policy statement to some of the elements of.'concern there; that
is PUP 3.6, where it nol only talks aUout the City Center, but again talks about that undergrounding of
• facilities issue, and he has brought and will suhmit to the record the copy of case law in the State of
Washington that recogr►izes that if a City mandates the undergrounding of facilities, that the City will be
the one that will pay for thnse undergrounclings; if the policy movcs forward he said he will mnst
certainly act imder those policies; but just wantrd to make it cleae wtiere that cost issue resides. Lastly,
policy 3.7 which refers to vegetatiUn management; lie saicl they would submit the following suggested language: "the City will coordinate lanciscaping atid screenina st<3ndards with utility providers to better
serve the mutual nceds of reliability and safety. The City will cooperate with utility providcrs for
vegetation management and mainterianec on public rights of way." He said that while landscaping and
sereening are always a pArtiqn c)f vegetation manaeemenC, lhe primary issue of that is fnr preserving ihc
integrity of the system ancl t:he safety of the public. He then comrnended the 1'lanning Commission's
work and diligence on this draft eomprehensive plan; aild t:hanked Council for their lime and opporfuttiCy
for public comment.
.lulie Prafl:e, 2104 S Veracrest Drive, Spukanc Vallcy: slie said that currently the building which is
accupied by the Spokane Valley (:hamber Of Cammerce is owiied by her and her husband; the building's
adcfress is 9507 F, SpraDue. She said the properly is lhe only one in this sectinn of Syraauc that is zoned
R1; anc1 that generally that is a class for neighborlioad businesses in a more residential area; and che rest
of the businesses along Sprague in this area are 132, appropriate for destinaCion businesses, retail and
office. She requcsts that when the Comprehensive Plan is adoptecl, that Couricil make zoning for this
property confonn to the rest nFthe neigltborhood as f32. She also thanked the Planning Commissioii ancf -
CoLmcil for the work on this Plan. . i
Council Meeting: 10-25-05 Page 2 of 11
Apptoved by Couneil:
Draft
~ ltob Lindsay, 3:19~'V 32°d SNolcane: said lie is the Water R.esources Manager for Spokane County; and is
here to offer cominents on the Comprehensive Plan, specifically the chapt:er related to the nacural
enviranment and the scction related to water quality. f-le subcnitted his letter to the Clerk, and st<ited that
he submitted an e-tnail Garlier today. He saicl he has three comments on the Plan. The frsC of which is
that he was pleased to see that the Cop policy under the water quality section was that the City of Spokane
Valley staff would acCively and cooperatively participate with oCher agencies, including Spokane County,
the cit.ies of Spokane, vT.illwrood, LiUerty Lske, ancl also in Idaho; and given that do reside over a sole-
source aquifer that we all Share in, he said he carinot stress enouah how pleased he is to see dhis spirit of
cooperation; ancl as we move forward in managing consistently our planning polic:ies and objectives
lhroughout the region, it is very important to cooperate and find consiseency in our policies. He said he
wanted to rcmind everyone that Spokane County did dcvelop a Critical Areas Orciinance in accordance
with the Growth Matiagcmenc Act back in 2003, and as part of that cYercise, took a look comprehensively
througMout the enrire Spokanc County u-ea identifying susceptible rec}iaroc i31GilS, that is ai•ess that are
especially sensitive as t:hey recharge our aqijiFcr that we di•aw our clrinking water from. He s<<id it should
be no surprise that the Spokane Valley IZathdrum Prairie Aquifer, wliich comprises the valley that we
resitle nn, that the entire CiCy of Spokane Valley is sitting on top of the most highly suseeptible area
within [}le ayuifer, and it is the most sensitive area in lernis of a rechargc standpnint for our drinking
water source. Going back to the Comprehensive I'lan, he said he is pleased to scc the spirit of
cooperation, but noticed that the Plan was fairl_y lean on policies to achieve thaC objective in the Plan. He
said in his submieted letter, he developecf a list of approximately a dozen planning policies that Spokane
Counly incorporated into their 1'lan; and he wcnt: througli and selectcd them with the intent of icientifying
those he [hought were most relevant to our cpmmunity. He said they arc broken doNvn into four areas nf
threats to water qualiCy, tvhich Is the development of a critical areas ordinance whieh identifies al) the
differenl types of critical areas cvilhin the City_, and also to have polieies lvith respect to eoordinating with the purvey4rs ancl wellhead protection zones;that it is vcry 1R1p0I't111t t0 identify those criYical areas
~ arpund thcse drinking «<ells 1:haC we all rely on for our water, and we should talce a hard look at the
policies pn how to develop tliose pvrtieulv-ly as dley rclate t'o eritical niaterials, handling and storage. He
said he included somc polieies with respect to nur sta°mwatcr handling and d►ywells within the
community, as ttie drywells are a partieular threat to our groundwater quality ancl need to be maTiaged
more cffectively throughout the region. We saicl the Spokane Counl:y.Water Itesouroes Departrnent is
eYCited about this plan antt looks fonvarci to cooperating with the City of Spokane Valley.
Riclilyd Bryant, 12025 E 31b' Spokiine Valley: Hc said one of his main concetns is transporCation issues
in the City according to the comp plan; ancl that ui his travels in llie service, he ha.s used multiple uses af
transpoirtation itnd he would like Co see the City, as its goal, to takc a serious look at maybe putting lig}it
rail in with the couplet at the same tiiue, because it can keep a Int oF cars off the road and can reduce
pollution; and in this area, it has just been io recent ycars througli the EPA that we h3ve not been on the
hit-list fpr nonattaiiunent of clean ,air. He said tie rcad in °1'ltursday's paper that Councilmernber °l'aylor
said lhue studies tliat have been done for liglit rail, show the numbers for ridership aren't there. He said he
wondered where Mr. Taylor received his ctata from, because all the nambers he (VIr. Bryant)11as seen and
the ITA (Federal `I'rlnsportation tldministration) has shown through studies that indicaCe numbers it is a
very valid system that could be thcre; where light rail has been in other cities; they havc achieved their .
- goals witJiin the first six to nine months of'opcration; and all arc e.tpanding, including Yortland, Salt Lake
City, and Sati Jose. Ne said he realizes a few of these cities are larger than Spokane, but the Valley has a
chance to be proactive in plsn.riinb instead of reactive; and if you say you don't necc) it right now, bu1 in
six years when we will need it, it c;an be on line by ihen and would put us sheacl of the power curve
instead of being like the neighbori.ng cities in crisis management all the time. Hc would like to sec the
City with the Comp Plan look into that; and exhaust all possibilities for mass transit before adding another
~ road.
.
Cottncil Niceting: 10-25-05 Page 3 of 11
Approved by CounciL
Draft
Rarbara Varyter, 11525 E 48`6: She said she wanted to address the comprehensive plan, and ask what do
neighbt,rs c3o if tFicy strongly diSagree with the zoning nf a specifie area; how do ncighbors get tcagether
and petition tor consideration of rezoning. Shc said slie doesn't {:now how that is done or how to find that '
out; but whether the Cornrrehensive Plan desires for an area tn be sinSle family or not:, if tllc lots arc
unsellable as single family it has de-valued the persontil property [o zero, and quite possibly a fa,nily's
sole saurce of equity. She said the area between Pines and Uriion, Union is one block west of F'ines on
Mission; is surrounded by businesses, offices, and multifamily units. She said the lots are huge and lonn
ancl extend all the way to the free«<<Yy; that they ttre highly suitable to multif'amily or busiiiess and are on a
bus route. She said she thinks dhey were originally zoned U2, which means four-plex mtrybe, ttnd she is
.in owner of one of those lots on the north sicle of Mission. She said 1'or ycars she did not ohject as Qne
business afl;er another surroundcd her, Uelieving that they would aJso be able to converl to business •
zoning if that was the best choicE; o.f land use for their individual lots. She stated there are a(so many
multi-family unit~s furt}ier west on Mission from Bowdish past the piUk. She said it is their opinion lhat
the lots just west of ApplebEes are unsellable as singlc fiarnily lots.
Kathy 1'abbert, 18505 E 4"` Avcnue: She said they are the PUD n. i„htmare peaple; and she was hoping
to remind everyone thal when we decicle t:o put in clenser housing in an existir►g neighborliood, to look aC
lhe whole picturc and that the whole area shAUld be developed; that the plan should ask for how the whale
street would be developed, and on her particular road there is a schonl; and she has seen kids driving
down, with busses comin;, ancl SW's comina, and that one day somcone likely will get hit; so when we
• consider comprehensive plan, 1'UDs, or anv plan li.ke that, denser population should be in there when
Iookino al the wt►olc road and not just the road to the nearest big ai-terial; because a lot of people will go a
different way'to avnid the big arterials bccause t:hey are harder to oet on, likc the particular cfevelopment
she is speaking of, they went to Barker; but if you go into the Valley }rou won't go down Barker but will
go down a different road. She woulcl like to see in the Comprehensive Plan, _more of a comprehensive ~
look at khe area and she «<ould like ta also have it in there diat they cannot loak outside the immediate
area that tlie particular development is being built. She s3id in her positinn, the neighborhood that was
notified of this particular PUD, that is their neighbortiood; but then they brouaht in othcr ncighborhoocts
and conSidered those neighborhoods. And lastly, she asked if it would be possible to recei<<e notification
when proposals are completed, as sometimes extensions are granted and the neighbors are not aware.
Tom Tabbert, 1$505 E 4`h Avenue: Spoke concernint,,► UL .3.2 and UL 3.3 and the development of
PUDs and that he'd like to strike that from the comprehensive plan; he said PUDS allow develope_rs to
come into an area, throw out nlinimums regarding zoning, and put in as many homes as tliey can fit into .
the arca; 6e saici hc woulci ralher scc c-ouncil give some leelh lo lhe residEnts, anci he would like to see
some lawS purt together to give residents the ability to fight proposed PUlls.
Polly Crowlcy, 2805 Y Argonne: she spoke of a cnrrection that should be made, and she referenced
Capital Facilities page 33; that Argonne and Park no longer exist and Ihose should bc listed as Ccntcnnial
and West Valley School 17istrict, and an additional high school is contract-ba,sed edttcation; she said it
appears these figures were obtained from the superintendent of public instruction; and tliat they will
submit in writing the square foot and capacity of those buildings.
11'lary 1'ollard, 17216 L lialdwin Avenuc: said she was speaking for the North Greenacres
neighborhoad; she then read ttnd paraphrased her written summary of priority issues: "the whole idea of
appealing to the government off cials ancl leaders is a recognition of a system that should be human and
compassionate. This is wfiat citizens expect wfien they come to their city cauncil. lmpassioned pleas for
justice are met wiih cvooc3en bureaucralie interaction tihat is empty of Nvhat is common sense and human.
Insteacl. af fairness ancl gooclness, government eYists as a displaced codified fact that is separate from
rcality. Jt is deliberately designed to be so unifiorm that ariy human intervention by oflieials is daunting.
The ballast is tipped to the developer and not neighbqrhoods. Thc city must create a more balanced a.nd
Coimcil Nieeting: 10-25-05 Paee 4 of 1 l
Approveci by Council:
Draft fair process. The picture must include all ciliLens i.nstead of paildering to s single industry housing. Tlie
0 hiimatie treatment of our present problcros requires i.nterim policies diey are absent and we cannnt wait a
generation for safe roads, parks, roads, etc. We are asking that you would include policies that provide
dhese human necc,.ssary elements. '1'his is nur community's plan, not a business venCure. When I read the .
land use, zoning is a facade. There is really not any low density residential. All densities appear to be
considered. We need an expectation of what our neighborhoods will be like, tiVe clon't want them
chewecl up by poorly designed, high densities thai ruin the eharacter of neighborhoods. The problem is
this is not just about densily but about the infi•flstructure ricedect to support density. Consistently
neighborhoods and citi7,ens have dcmanded lhat zoning be fixed. We want something prcclictable, not up
zoning. `Ihis is how the policy reads. This is a coning free-for all. LUP 1.8 allows zone changes within
the lQw density resictential category only when specific criteria aee rnet. Substantial changes within wne
change are.1s, clear mapping areas, adequate faeililies and services, sewer, water, capaciry, ete. consistent
wiih densities in the vici.niCy of the zone cliange. The last rivo are going to continue the eonnicts and
disen.franchisement of average citizens. VJe want a predictability to where we live. lnstead, every time a
developer waves his magie attorne;y three times in the air ajid threatens lawsuit, t}ie Council is bul]iecl intn
change. VVhile cxpediling development is cost effective, is it not wikhout cost; and the neighborhood is
expected tn pick it up now. They are Approved without condiCions fnr approving less improved connective
roads, and yet therc's laws Chat require those kind of diings. Irlipact fiees are reall}' important. We cannot
afT'drd a minimum standard city. Citizens of modest income cannnt afford tp repair constantly and rebuild
inferior quality. Impact fees are being lost every timc a developmenl is approved. Those most able to
pay; pay nothing. And the City assumes the entire community can pick up these extensive costs thraugh
W(es. 4Ve say enougll. Study, assess, and colle;ct them. Without impact fees, it's a nolicy of anti-
cammunity, prq-tax your citizenry. l his is the one fee we actually get something back for. lt builds a
solici economy and it promotes economic developcnent. The thirteen agencies that the development
applications go to, havc such minimum standards that-liardly anything does not pass muster. We are _
~ finding absent, ttiere's nothinS about green space for multi-family housing; this is really vital because it
looks like Motel 6, and that there shquld be a goal thae there's incentive to build ownership ancl affordable
tiousinD for lower ineome penple. An example of that is Dishmtj-n Commons. VJe did a revision to
chapter lU (which she handed to tlie Clerk). Agricultural, livestocl: issues; t}ic}' are sCill on the table.
i ig}uing is noC apparent in the plan." She concluded by acknowledging CoLmcil's efforts, and stated that
• she lauded what the staff tias dorie. She said that no one received the invitation [of the October 18
hearingJ until late; that invitations came out on the 20`h; and that she arrived last -vveek but arrived too late
to testify. .
Mayor Wilhite indicated more public hearin(gs on ehe comprehensive plan wil] be held. Councilmember
Taylor asked, anci it was coiifrrneci chat Irgal notice was adequately published in the newspaper
concernuig these public hearings.
James Pollard, 17216 E Baldwin Avenue: he Chanked all the Greenacres neighbors who worked on the
neiehborhaod plan; and said that the opinion delivered by Mary is the opinion of dozens of people and
not just the opinion of the Pol(ards. One point brought up was he said, was about presen~ing and adding
trees with mitigation policies atid plantings; and diat ilie goal to this wpuld be Co miCigate tree removal
due to developmetat; by replanCing on or near sited development, or by c;ontributing to the city's tree fund.
rie explained that trees contribute ta better air quality and beautiiy the city. Another point he mentioned
was abaut sub-area neighuorhood planning, which he stated is a pro-active approach te avoid or minimize
land use cnnflicts and adverse irTipacts on neighboring uses. 1qe said that by reeoE,;nizing non-conforming use and balancing their needs with g;ood development practices; that it promotes quality of life by jointly
planning with those who have inti.ma[e i:nowledge of the characteristics of an area; and sub-area
neighborhood planning finds out what impaets the com.muuliry is concertied about, and simultaneou.sly
proposes regulatians and ordinances to make changcs betler fit with the coltimurlity. He said
_ J neighborhooil plans give continuity of lhought and purpose that stand throughout changes in leadership.
Council fvfccting: 10-25-05 E'age S of 11
Approveci by Council:
Draft •
Chuek SimpSOn, E 9003 Calaldo: said they are land surveyors and civil engineers; and he tias coiiiments
concerning Chapter 2 and LU1' 1.1, which states "encourage developmcnt of parks and dedica[ion of
open space and adjacent ta resideritial areas. Open space dedication shall be proportionate tA the size of ~
development." He said he thinl:s thal is fine but asl:s who will maintain that. On LUf' 1.6: "consider
speeial development techniques, zero lot line, plot averaging, planned unit developments in single family
areas, provided thcy result in residential development consistent with the quality and character existina
' neighbor}ioods." He said he in the central part of the valley where you own either a hal_f acrc or an acre;
and he doesn't sec how dhat fits in wilh this. Concerning LUG 1.6: "=providc a well connected street
system and minimize deaci ends and cul-de-sacs slreets." Prom the development layouts they do for
people, he said that a lot of developers want cul-de-sacs and a lol of people want to live in cul-de=sacs
because it isolates the neijhborhoods auid they don't Mave die ongoing triffic and is safer. Tlien in
discussing continuity of the streets and traffic calmin€, he saict it appears you want your s4reets so they
can go thrnu;;h Erom otie residential neighborhood to another area, yet you wanl to calm them down, aild
the only way to do thal is by dead ends and cul-de-sacs, or T-intersections. He said it sounds like you
want to do aw3y with private roads; ttnd if you follow your standard of private roads, then private roads
shall be developed amd eanstructed as public streets; then somcone would be crazy tn develop a private .
road because yau would be maintaini.ng a road that yuu might as well let the eounty mair►tain. He said he
t.hinks most reasons people want aprivate road is the parcel or propcriy they vvant to develop is a liltle Coo
narrow, so they can get by with a narrow roacl. He added that anodier portion says to have sidewalk only
on one side rather than on' both sides; and ihat *CrP-4.fi says new develnpmenl- must bc connected to
public se,%ver and water. He said that is great but there are parls of the vAlley that won't be sewered unkil
2002; sn if he: owncd a five or ten acre piece and wanted to retire, he couldn't develop it; and added that
septic tanks have wrorked f4r years; a lot of people say they don't w•ork and a lot of people say they do. We said it would be stret:ching it too far to connect it to sewe.r.
Bonnie Quinn, 727 W. Garland, 5pokane, 99205: said she represents ALito 1'Zow, which consists of
Appleway Automotive, Gus Johnson rord, I•fallmark Hyundai, Spokane Chrysler, Dishman Dodge, and .
Jaremko Nissan/Saab. She said they sCrongly favor the comprehensive plan and the atrto row overlay.
John Peterson, 8412 F Spraguc Avenue: speaking on behalf of Pring Corporation, he said his
comments tonight are subject to a complete review of the overall comprehensive plan wliich he has not
had an oppnrtuniey to 1'uUy review. I-Ie espressed concerns regarding the comp plan and the overzill ou/l:iy
for a city center, :ind ssid there has be•en quite a bit nf public:iCion for different ideas for a city center
loentetl iu areas where they have socne property located; t:hal he ciacs no[ know tlle timefi•ame to
implemeiit s change of the city center frorn its location here to the designated arc,a; that the city center
uses iherc appear to downgrade the zonin- oF the cxisting properties zoned there, which is now 133, a
commercizl zone. He eYplained that it has been a commercial zonc for many years Fuid he is concerned
with the comp plan and no zoning matrixes ppsted at this time, anci wonclers what our actual uses will be
for 11nd that has bcen zoned commercial fnr a lang period of time. I-[e said he would ask antl hope that
t:here would be some procedure or format thai somebody could cnme in, if all of a suclden faced wit}i a
comp plan change i+nd zoning rnatrixes that they are noC familiar with, that we could come in and timely
get a channe of zoning or some sort of a srarutory procedure that would allow something to chanbe that
woulcl ft, because he doesn't know t►ow long it's going to be beFore the city eenter will be there, and
bsfore that takes place. He requested khere be a procedure for a zone change ancl if possible, not knowing
what the plwnning, depart;ment is doing in that regard, if they made arly z4ning matrixes, he'd like tn see
those if possible.
Mayor Wilhite inviCed othcr public comments, and no fiirther comments wcre offered. Mayor Wilhite
then asked if City Clerk Bainbridge had anything for the record, City Clerk Bainbridae stated she wanted
to acknotivledge two informationa) staff inemos dated eoday regarcEinb the comprehensive plan, which
memos will be included in the public comment baok for council rcvicw. _
Council i'v9ccting: 10-25-05 Page G of 11
Approved by Council:
l7raft
Msyor Wilhite informed everyone that tonighl's public hearing is the beginning of the process for this
~ comprehensive plan, that CDs are available aC City I-Iall; and hard eopics of ttie Plan'are 3vailable for
review at the librriry. Mayor Williite s&-tted t:hat Council will begin diseussinn of the plan beginning with
the Transportation c;hapter; t}iat she estim<<tes three pr four meeCings to discu-,s that chapCer, but that
sclleduile is tcntative. Followinb deliberation on the 1"ransportation Chapter, she eYplaincd that Council
will move to the Land Use Chapter, followed by Utilities Chapter; and furtllcr order would be deCerntiried
later zind the public will be kept inforinetl of which chapicr will be under delibcration. vlayor WilhiCe
announced that other public hearings will be hcld but likely not unCil after the first of the year due to the
holidays. Mayor Wilhite added t.hat the public is welc:ome and encouraged to submit written comments
via letters and/or e-mail. T)eputy City Mana{;er Regor also acknowledged vlr. Hansen's writterl
comments as part of the public hearino process. Mayor VJilhile clused t}ie public hearing ftt 6:59 p.m.
Vtayar Wilhite called for a recess at 7:00 p.m., and reconvenecl the meeting at 7:10 p.m.
2. CONSENT AGFNDA Consists of itcros considered routine which are approved as agroup. A
Councilmember may rcmove an item frnm the Consent Agenda to be considcred separately.
Payeoll for October 15 2005 Pav Period in the Amount of $139.359.71
It was maved by Cozurcilineiiaber Schimmels, secnnded by C'oaencilnrenther Derteinry, crrrd ununi»tou.sly
ugreetl trpon to apprvve the Cort,sent Agerrda.
NEW HiJSINESS 3. Motion Cdnsideration: Approval of 2005/2007 Cammimity l7evelopmcnt Black Grant I'roject .T.ist -
Grcg V1cCormick
It was inoved by Coanicilmember Flairigcui und .seconded by Cowrcibneinber Denerrny, to direct stuff to
a prEpure tlre appropriale CD1.3G applrcatiort ntaterials for submission to Spokarte Cotuityfor tlae following
~ projects: (1) ivlonlgoniery Avenue: Iiitiversity Road to Argarne Road, estinurtecl cost S635,270; (2)
Bcrrker Xaacl, f1ppleway ro Spragice :ivenue, estimated cost S783,293; (3) Veru Terrace Sewei- Projecl
(full-widt/z paving), eslamuted cbst ,S"207,815; uncl (4) a AleighGorlaood C'leariup Froject, estinaated cost
,S75,000. It wa,.~ also'mentioned t:hat Chese prQjects are not i❑ a priority order. vlayor 1Vilhite invit:ed
public comment.
Kathv Tarhert, 13505 E 4`h: tlskeci the nature af the Appleway Way to Sprague Flvenue projcct.
Planning Manager vlcCormick replied that the project is the first portion of a larber project for fu11-widtli
conslTuetion of .T3arker out to four lanes. Tviayor Wilhite invitecl Purt:her public comment; no fuciher
comments were offered. Vnte Gy Acclan7atiori: Lr Ftrvor: iJira»iriroaES. Opposed: 1Wane. Ahstentior7s:
1Vone. Motion curried. -
4. Motiort Consideration; Reqtjest to Usc Snokane Vallev Citv Lo«o - Ma or Wilhite
It ivas mv>>Ed by Departy eYlcryor Miaisvri cmcl seconded hy Couricilmember Tcrylor to a!lotiv the Spolunie
Area EDC to r.tse the copyrig{lted logo for Spokane Yulley iri their marketing malerials. 'Mayor Wilhite '
rnentioned that a letter of reque.st was received from the Spokane Area EDC requesting the use of the
City's lngn in the ETaC's marketing materials, on t:heir website, and in [heir printetl matcrials that are used
in recruitrnertt, expansion and retention cfforts. vlayor Wilhite ehen invited public comment.
Clark E. Hager, Sr., .11717 T' laenora_Drive: saicl he ciocsri't have the greatest problem with the rDC also
having access to the trademark logo of the City of Spokane Valley; that a controversy ha.s ai•isen about an
ad that he placed in the Valley News Herald ancl Valley Voice where he placed a logo of the City of
Spokane Valley on a piogy bank; he said that he takes full responsibility for the placement of that logo on
that ad; that he does not apologize fnr the ad; and that this places in mind who o'%+ms t}le logo of the City
of Spakane Valley. f-le said he knows that the State of Washington Iias a law that grants to chose
~ individuals who get and pay for a trademark, that chey have exclusive rights ro th7t Yrademark; the
Council NfeeTine: 10-25-05 i'age 7 oP 11
Approved by Council:
Draft
queseian is who owns diat trademark; tie saicl that eaeh cicizen paid for and authori7ect the ereation of that
loao and thercf.'ore each cit:izen has an ownership intet•est in that logo anci then probably has the right ta ~
use it. However; he said he recoonizes the possibility lhat the citizens who are the owners of the City nlay
have granted thcir subordinate legislative representatives to creafe an ordinance granting limited access to
the logo and to limit those who may not have acc;ess tn that logo; and that khere may have been an
ordinancc ereated giving the City Clerk the power to grant permission for whn can and cannot use it; that
the question needs to be detcrmineci on who has the o«mership and use of the loao. '1'o clarify that, Mr.
Ha.ger I:hen requested as a public record request, "any and all ordinances that have been createcf giving
spECifc authority to an individual to the ex-clusiUn of all owners of dlat log4, which he belie<<es to Ue the
citizens of the Spokane Valley."
.17ick Behm, 9405 East Sprague: said hc owns several trademark logos for busine.ss wid commercial
purposes; and lhat his understzinding is people cannot usc his logo on a different product, but can use the
Icago as long as the logo represents the product.
Mayor Wilhite said she wiU request the City rl.ttorney to research the issue., Yote by Acclamatinn: In
Fm~rn•: Untrninroas. Oppased: iltorte. Abstentions: A'onc. Molioir carried
PUBLIC COti'[MF.N7°S MarY Ppllarcl, 17216 E Baldwin Avenue: spoke regarding the noise ordinance -overning construction
hours; said that it is more than a temporary inconvrenience, and she wants some mitigation; she stated that
you can't use the noise ordinance to regulate vi~rticion nf a house that makcs people sick (due to excessivc
noise); and that this issue needs 5ome at[ention, '
Clark E. T-Tager, Sr., 11717 E Lenoi-a Drive: said he has a question about the ncw hire from the City of
Spohane, the city attoniey, anci if he is still the chair of the Public Disclosure Commission and whether '
that represent;s a conflict of interest. vtayor Wilhite informed v1r. Hagcr that Mr. Connelly no longer '
serves as chair of that commission. IN1r. Hager acknowledged that rhal clarified the issue.
ADMMi ITSTR.A.T..NE REP017TS:
S. Appeal 02-05 - Cai
A, Driskell
It was risoved by Mcryor Willritc arrd secoiided hy Cotmcilmembcr ,F7anigcnt to ask the City.9ttvrriey to
preprrre the 1%inulinos, Concltr.sinns 'rnrd Jaecisian [o renrantl !he applicatioit buck !o tlre Hearing
Examiner. City Attarney Connelly eiplained thsc chis is part of 1 ctouble lppefll brought to council
several months ago; that the appeal dcalt wich a PUJ) plat tiiat had been approved in part and denied in
part by the llearing Gxarniner. He explained chat the neighborhood appeafed the approval, and Couneil
upheld the lpproval; anc;f t.hat: matter has been sppealecl to Supsrior Couit, and that we are in the midst of
that suii nqw. Aetnrney Coiuielly said the 14earing 'Examiner denied the PUD aspect of the project based
en an ordinance diat prohibited PIJTas from being attached to arterials; ancl C:ouncil has not talcen fnal
action on that appeal. In the interim period, Iic staieci, that the Planning Commission recommended a
change in the vrciinatice to remove that restriction; Council approved the change in that ordinance last
week; and we are still f.'acecl wit;h the appeal that we have riot taken action on. Ntr. Connelly said that
options a.re tn uphold die t-Iearing Fxaminer decision, «fiich might be at least inconsistent wit}i current
law passed last week; to uphold the appeal a.ncl reverse the decision of the Hetiring Examiner arld simply
qpprove the projec;r, nr to remand the rnatter back to the Hearing 11xaminer for reconsidei-ation in light of
the new law. v1r. Connelly stated that it is his o.tficc's recammendation that Council remand the issue
back tn the I-Iearing Examiner for reconsideration in light of the new law; in order to provide all parties a
chauce to be heard; and to go through an ordcrly procF:ss tn protect due process. •
Deputy vtayor Nlunson, askecl how we could changc the law now and go back for reconsideration.
Attorney Connelly explaincd tha[ the vested rights belong to the applicant; that council c<tn change the
~-J
Council vleeting: 10-25-05 Page 8 of 1]
Approved by Council:
Drafi
~ lsw at any lime; but bec<3use no final decision was mflde, it is within Council's jurisdiction on an appeal
to remand the matter for further consideration, therefore it wnuld be valid and lawful. Councilrnembcr
DeVleming stated public commetit should be allnwed zs this is now a motion. Becausc this is now up for
motion consideration, Ms. Regor stated it «rould be appropriate to ask for public comment. Mayor
Wilhite invited public comment.
Niarv Pollard. 17216 E Baldwin Avenue: said thaC because of the unifonnity of a veiy bad prsctice
}iappcning all over the city, ancl t.hat was the impetus of that changc; anci that the Ciming oF that change
was very terrible because everyone was waiting for ordinance changes, and because diey don't have
atkorneys they are being ignored. She said this sends a message to die community if you have an attorney
and don't get your project through, you jast get the City Gouncil to chkinge the ordinance; she said she
knows Council tried hard to be impartial, but that it really doesn't change anything in some ways if
cnuncil were to start over or it were remanded to the Hcaring E:caminer, ancl he probably ends up with the
same results beeause he ends up with a la«< that is very amenable to hirn; but she said it cloesn't change
the danger to the communiiies, and she stated that she is very deeply disappointed that they were ablc to
manipulate eouncil this way.
lleputy Ivlayor Munson said he wil) vote against the proposed rnotion as he feels council should apply the
law consistently, and nqt givc the appearance ot "cherry-picking'" situations. Councilmember Taylor
statecl t:hae he is uncertain that there is an issue of appearsnce of fairness; that there is a situation that if
the tlevelopment liad not gone fonva.rd as a PUD, it could ha>>c gone forwarci as a straiomt plat and gone around the arterial requirernent in tlac PLTD ordinanee; and that the same number of cars would be going
out on a non-arterial and the only difference is that it is a PUTa; and the proposecl YUll has spaces for
open space which would not havc been case for straight plat. Vote by Acclamation: Itr Ftrvor: 1Waryor
Wilhite, Courtcrlrnembers Sclrimnrels, Ttrylor, Dcnerrrzy, Flarrigan, and DeVleniirtg. Dpposed.• Depzity
~ Mayor ,Wiursot7. AbslEittions: iN'one. Alalion cnrried.
DiSCUSSlO\': Council UeliUeration, Comprehensive; Plan Draf[
Transportatiori Chaple.r:
Cauncil cliscussed possible methods of deliberation, ineluding gQing ttirough the document line by line;
throwing otit comments and issues fqr dcliberation; or boing through the chapter, choosing and
identifying isstacs, perhaps liimping some issues together, keep a running tally and proceed to deliberate
lhereafter. lt was council consensus to follow the last statect recommendtilion.
. 3.0 Introduc;Cion.l7eputy Mayor Munson suggestecl strik.iliQ the lasC bullet on the introduction: "Continued
dependency on drivi»g mqy iiot be suscainablc in the luture, eifher economically and/or environmentslly,"
as he ;aid the sentence is subjective as it could depend upon how Far in the Cuture one is willing take die- .
limited factor of driving. Councilmember DeVleming voiced his agreement. On the last paragraph of
3.0, Councilmember I7eVleming suggested adding "economic impacLS;" Depucy Mayor Vlunson agreed.
Bicycles: Deputy Mayor Munson mentioncd ihere appears to be a continuing reference to using bikcs;
t73i IlZ w3[1tS CO makc sure there are; hike paThs; he does not want to develop a cornprchensive plan that
requires the building of an ettensive bicycle network thst is used by a few for a few months ayear; that
he would rather conccnxrate on wr►Iki.n„ trails and greel1 areas which is a tocus in the natural envi.ronment section. Deputy Mayor Munson referenccd page 5, paragraph 16B; and said he feels tlhat is too c.Yacting
to build a large plan upan; and that we should state we want bicycle trials, and want to ensurc our roads
provide safety for bicycles. Mandatoty Vei•biaoe: Senior Planner Kuhta noted there are parts of this Plan which contain sections aP the
County-wide plannina policies, whicli policies-are not subjecl tn change but are for referencc; ancl we are
to clevelap our own plan Luider the umbrella of the County-Nvicie planning pnlicies and Gro«rth
Council Meccin~: 10-25-05 Page 9 of 11
Approved by Council:
Dr.aft
M.anAgement Act regiilaiioiis. It w9s also suggested that the plan.ning sla.ff provide clear guidelines on
w=hat verbiage is mandator}° and not subject to change. Director Sukup explained thai each chapter ;
eontains an int:roduction, followecf by a planninb context which outlines the niles to follow, whether it is ~ J
the GMt\, the County-wide planning policies, or niles of SRTCs. She also mentiAned that the reason
tliese other policies are contained in our Plan, is to rcmind the communicy that nur plan dnes not stand
alone and ehese rebulaCions must be talcen into account when formulating our own plan. Taeputy CiCy
Manager Regor stated 2hat "Policy Topic S-Trtuisportation" is a verbalim SecCion of the Cnunty-wide
Planning Policy and not a specific city gnal and policy and is there as a reference. It was nqted by
Gouncilmember Taylor that whether that (or other) section is included in our Plan, the City musl slill
operatc under those guidelines.
Financial Tncentivcs: Mayar Wilhite noted page 5 section 16C states that we are to prQVide regulatory and
financial incentives to promote efforts of the publie atid private Seetor Co conserve energy, aid slie
speculated how to accomplish that witliout running che risk of "gifting of public funds." Attorney
Connelly said here are legal ways to do provide financial inaentivcs. Councilmember lleVleming also
mentioned that there is a cost assaciated with these policies 3nd we need to keep in mind who will be
paying for these policies. Plannin-g Commission: Councilrnember Flanigan suggestecl each councilmember read and revicw the
mintrtes frnm the Planning Conunission meeting
gs so as not to duplicttce their six-months worth af time
and effort, and to gain insigt►l into their deliberations and perhaps save timc during Council's owm
deliberations. Councilmember Schimmels aclcleci the need to read, review; and question wtiat the
PIafU11t1o CQrnrnissiori has done in order to make necessary changes, but to do sn withoul "reinventing the
wheel."
Definitions and abbreviations: Dcputy Iviayor Munson asked for a definition ot the word "circuiCOUS" as found on pace 9, last sentence in the first paragraph: "exccssively circuiCOUS." 17irector Sulaip explainecl
that it deals with the requirements for Putting streets on a plan that are not there now; atid thst an example
of a cii-cuitous routc is mah_in- the transitinn from Appleway back to Sprague, usi.ng the eYtension of
Appleway. 11'age 11, paragraph 32.5 third bullcr.: Deputy Mayar Munson asl:s that SpV s}ioulcl be
defined. Deputy Vlayor Munson SC3ted th<tC there iue other abbreviations particularly in the ttjbles; that
need to be spelled out.
Go11s and Policies: Deputy Mayor Iblunson mentioned that page 11, pa.ragraph 3.2.5,.third bullet implies
the necd for park.ing meters as a way to reduce the number qf SOV vehiclES; and he believes we should
ban parking meters in the city; and wants to insure sueh is specif ed tmder dle policies aild gosls.
Concurrencv: Coiincilmember Flviigan stated he wrould like lo encourage looking more at the total
vehicle miles (TVIv) rattier t1ian timeframes, as the '1'VM has more of an impact on the roads. Planning
Comrnissioner Crosby stated thzt they looked st the LOS (levcl qf service) more than TVV1 for
inte»ections, as the intersections' failure.s are rnore controlling than the'1"VNIs. NeighborhoodlSub-area Circulations Plans: Councilmember Denenny mentioned tliis scction (3.2.7.2) as
a'statement of visioning as it states how we want our roadways designed; and lie asked if Council agrees
with the statement. Councilinember DeVleming said he feels this whole section warrants more discussion. Councilmernbcr Taylor addcd that cul-de-sacs also warrant further discussion.
TvDos and Forniats: UeputyUlayor Iviunson suggestetl having the tables a larger font tor case in reading.
Councilmember Taylor mentioned that under Transit 3.4, the local option election actually auiharized an
adclitional 3/10[hs of one percent; and not an additional thrce cents as noted. ~ t
Council Ivieeting: 10-25-05 Page 10 of 1 I
Approved hy Council:
Draft ~ Freitzht & C7oods; and Truck Roui:c:s: Deputy Mayor Miinson saicl this section 3.2.7.4 leads to the questial'
of how da we want: Appleway and Sprabue to look; what kind of traf3~ic do we want on it; do rve want
only truck traffic on the easdwest cori•idor, then allow track deliveries on Sprague only, and he a.sked if
this is the area to discuss this or leave that up to economic development? Tt wa.s deterrninecl that that
question will be left Cor further eonsiderat:ion. 'fruck Kautes were questioned concerning through truck
traffic; and discussion ensued regarding current hvck routes, weight limits, and trucks allowed or not on
Barker Road; and if tivck routes can be mandated by Council.
lt tivr.rs movecl by Courrcrlmenrber .Tuylor, seconded, antl ruzarrintously agreed upari !o exlend f72e meeting
to 4:I0p.nz Deputy City Manager Regor sugge,sted Council may find it easier to start with goals and
policies and maps as poinCS of discussion; Co have staff identify what text is ma.ndatory, and to seltle on
which version to work from. Council concurred dhey will work from the "etean" copy rsther than the
strikethrough version. Ms. Kegor slso mentioned that she has copies of the land use designatinns for
inclusion in the rront pocket of Councilmember's comp plan notebooks. Ms. Regor also mentioned dhat
Council will receive copies t:omorrow of the Rvo rnemos menlioned earlier for the recorcl; ant1 tha[ public
hearings v-e intended to be forums to cnllect cnmments from the public, and that other than during public
hearinbs, if'the public clesires to have their comments included as part of the record, such comments may
be submitted in writing by letter or e-mail. $he mentianed that Npve►nber 14, 28, and laecember 12 are
. reserved For off-sice meetings; ancl that Council stated t'heir intent to have those meetings as. public
deliberations and if that is the case, [here will be no forum for public input ot:her chan written comment.
After brief discussion; it was determined that to better involve the public at those off-site meetings, the
preferred methnd would be ttu-ougli a public huu-ing. There was cnuncil consensus if the locations
wsrraait taping of public heariiigs, dhst the three alaove-mentianed rneetings should ne public hcarinos; and
staff will work to find appropriatc locations. it was also menlioned staff shUuld inviCe members oE 1:hc
E'lanning Commission to eouncil meetings where comprehensive plan deliberations au-e to t-►ke place.
~ Tlicre bcing no further business, it tvcrs movecl by Cvuncilnteniber Flurtigun, seconded, mul unaniniatisly
agreed upon to ndjocirn. The meeting adjourned at 9: 10 p.m.
A 1"I"ES"1': Diana Wilhite, Mayor
Christine 13ainbridDe, City Clerk
Council R![eeting: 10-25-05 Page 11 of I 1
Approved by Cowicil:
Draft
A711`UTFS
Ciry of Spokane Valley
~ City Council Specifil Mceting
Tuesday, \iuvember 1, 2005
Mayor Wilhite called the meeYing to order at 6:00 p.m., anc3 welcomed everyone to the 74`4 mccting
Attendairce: City Staff
Diana Wilhite, i1~layor \'ina R.cgor, DepuCy City Vlanager
Rich Munson, DeputyMayor vtike Connelly, City Attorney
Dick ]7enenny; Councilmember Ken Thnmpson, Finance Director
vlike DeVleming, Councilmcmber Mike Jsckson, Parks & Recreation 17irector
Mike Flanigan, CouncilmemUer Tom Seholtens, Building Official
Gaty Schiitirnels, Councilmember Cal Walker, Police Chief
Steve "laylor, Councilmember • Neil Kersten, Public Works Dircctor
Marina Sukup, Communily llevelopment Director
GreS McCornlick, Planning Manager
"BinD" Grec Bintaman,ll Specialist
Chris Bainbridge, Cit}, Clcrk
TNVOCATION: 1'astor I7avid Johnsnn, Valley United Methadist Church gave the invocation.
PLEDGE 0FAL-LE GIAINCE: iMayor Wilhite led everyone in the Pledge of.'Allegiance.
170LL CALL: City Clerk T3ainbridge called roll; all Councilmembers were present.
~ A,PPRQVAL OF AGENDA: It tivus nivved by Depcrty lllcryor 1Wunso►r, secontled by Courrcihrrember
DeVlemrfTg; arld unrini►nously ugreed to apprave the ugeircltr ay presented.
• liNT1tbDUCTIOV QT SPF:C.TAL GUESTS AN9) PRFSENTAi'1ON5: New Employee InCroductions: rinance Taireeeer "1'hompson introduccd Charlotte "Cliarlie" Rfiegcr, ncw Aeeountant/Budget AnalysC.
Council welcomed Charlie lo the stiiff.
COMMiTTEE, BOA1W, L[AISQ\i SUND W2Y 1ZL1'ORTS
Councilmember Flanipan: rcporCed that he attended a board meeting for the Public Heallh District where
Dr. "ChArburn discussed the bird flu article,s reporlcd by the press.
Councilmembcr Taenennv: said that he also attended the Public Iiealth lliscrict meetinu; atid ttiat he also
attended an STA (Spokane Transil Authority) meeting; and a"I'1bIDL(total maximum daily load) steering
committee meeting, and said it is anticipated that a full-SROUp meeting will bc held the end of\Tovember.
Councilmemher l7eVleminQ: merltiAneci he is working on the Community Christmas Tree and has
hopefully solved the shorEing malfuneeion problem.
, A11AYOE2'S REFQRT:
Mayor Wilhite reporled that she met with te<tchers vid students of West Valley School 17istrict which
runs a special school c<<Iled City School cvhere rhey have their own city council, and they expressed
interest in learning what we do; and that she itrvited lhem to participate in a meeting aftcr the First of the year; and that she also attentled a ribbon cutting for a new business; and attended a Aonderosa
Neighborhooc! Visioning Committee meeting.
PU}3C.,IC CQA .'I~l~i_F\tTS Mayor VJilhiie invited public comment, and rernincleci citizens if they have
comments about the comprehensive plan, such comments won't be part nf the public recnrd unless taken
" cluring a public hearing, or submitted in writi.ng. No public commcnts.were offerecl.
Council Ntceeina: 11-01-05 Page 1 ofQ
Approved by Council:
Draft
1. CUNSENT ACENDA Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a goup. A
Coimcilmember may remove an item from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately.
3. Claim Vouchers list dateci 10-24-05, Vouchers 7833 to 7897, tOt3I 3RlOUilt $254,236.95
b. Minutes of Regular Council ll4eeting of Qctober 11, 2005 '
c. Iviinutes of Spet;ixl Council Meetin}; of October 18, 2005
It was nioved Gy Co:utcilnrember Derrenny, secantled by (7oiuacilmember Flcmigarr, and aoianimorrsly
agreed crpan to approve the Cotzserit Agerrda as preseirted.
NFW ATJS..TNESS
2. I'rnposed Resolution 05-023. Amending I'ee 2esolution - Ken Thornpson
It rvus nrnved by Depury 1iluyor Mirnson atrtl secuncled by Cvurtcilmember Denenny to approve the unterldments to the fee resolutiori, resolution 05-023, as pre.renteri. Finance .Director went aver the
proposed changes to the fee resolution; ment:ioneci t:hal sl:aff sent out 661etters to architects, engicieers and
developers coneerning fees, and that 12 people attended the meeting, and dhat a summary oC that meeting
in inc(uded in the council packet. Mr. Thorr►pson also menCioned t6at these proposed changes include the
changes proposed by the fire depa-tment. vlr. Thompson added t}iat staff also would like to add a
blastina permit fee of S60.00 for life safety purposes, and asked that be part of the motion tn approve the
resolution. It was moved hy Deputy tWaya• Munson uncl secvnded by Councilntember Iaenenny !o umerzd
the motion [o irrc•h.cde a 560.00 blastirrg pennit fee fnr safety purposes. Yufe !u arnend the motiorr: In
Frrvvr: Unarlimou.s. ppj)osetl: r\rone, AbslEntioiis: None. A1'otion carrictl. Building OfEicial Scholtens
explained that we relied on L&I to provide the State compliance on blfiseing that takes place in the City,
but didn't look at the safety of citirens on a different level, as we wairt thern to use seismic devices to
►neasure grourid motion ancl to ensure that residents in the immediate area will be notified of impending
blasting; such notificaein❑ tn include placing signs, barricadcs, and sirens if deemed appropriate. Mr.
Scholtens said that $60.00 is about how much ie would cost to regulate that and do the administrative
work; .and in response tn Council questions, said that ttiis pcrmiE fee is for the occasional road blasting as
rnining would not be suhjeet to th.is fee. i~/layor Wilhite invited public comment; no comments were
offered. Vote by Acclctination orr Ilze crmendecl nnation: ht fim~or.• Uilarrinrous. Oppased: None.
Abstentiotrs: Nofie. Mation carried.
3. Motion Consideration: Appointment to i,odgin4? Tax tldvisary Committee - Mayqr Wilhite Mayor Wilhitc cxplai.neci that there were several applications submitted for this one position, and while
she was pleased with the response, it inakes choosing t:hat one person very difficult. I1 tivas moved by
Mcryor T3Jilltite ar•td secortded by Deputy Mcryor M':nrsorr to nppoisat Mike Conway franr Lata11 Creek
Winerv to this posilion vn the Lodgirrg Tax Advisory Coriin:ittee. vlayor Wilhite invited public commenl;
no commcn[s were offered. Council.member Taylor expressecl eoncern that there has been no eime to
- discuss the merits of the individuals; and Council.member Flanigan re,sponded Chat resumes w•ere
distributed to all Councilrnernbers several weeks ago, aiid if Any councilmember tivished, they could have
expressed dheir prcfcrence or questions to Mayoe Wilhite. Aftcr further brief council discussion on the
procedure to tal:e in filling appointmerus, it was decided that each councilmember should feel feee to give
input to the Mayor on applicants; and the Mayor will inform eouocilmembers earlier in the process, of the
applicant she intend.s to cboose. It tvas also noted this method should be applied to the upcoming open
positions on the 1'lanning Commission, It was also determined that Mr. Conway's terni will complete the
tcrm oF the person is he replacing, that of .T.isa Bracco. Councilmember T)eVlemi.ng mentioned the tteed
' for having staggered terms and it was detei7nined that staff will research that to sce iPthe ordinance needs
amending. Vote by Acelamtrliun: In Fcrvor: lWcryor Wilhitc, Deputy Mcryor Munson, uncl CoiaicilmemGers
Scltinrnrels, Fla►ligun, aitcl Detier:rry. Opposecf.• Councilntembers 1'aylor arrd DeVlemirig. Abstentio►7s:
A'orte. Molion carried.
PITBLIC CC)tiTWNTS Mayor Wilhite invitecl public comments; no eomments were offered.
Council Meeting: 1 1-0 1-05 Paee 2 of4
Approved by Couneil: -
Draft ril)i1VIlNiS`CItATTVF R.F..PORTS:
~ 4. Amending 2005 Bucl^lel-T:en Thqmpson
T'inance Director Thompson explained that any time it tippears we are ooing to exceed the budget, the
budget must be amended; dilt most of the changes are of a housekeeping naturc; such as receipt of the
cwo CommuniCy DevelopmEnt Block Grants, implementing the Comprehensive Plan, and CeriterPlacc
construction; which constrttction was still bclow overall buclget. Mr. Thompson mentioned that a Frst
reacling of an ortlinanee will be to council witllin the next several weeks, along with a puhlic hea.ring on
the proposed hudget amendment.
5. I'reliminary Legislative Agenda lnitial Thoughts - Vlayor Wilhite
Mayor VVilhite explained that several councilmembers will be traveling to Olympia in January and talking
with the legislature, and in anticipalion of that, Council needs to begin discussion of some of ttie issues
that AWC (Assoeiation of Wa.shington Cities) feels are important. lt was mentioned that the Chamher of
Commerce forms a list of capitil projects for rcaional consideration, and that the Children's Universal
1'ark woulci be a good candidate for inclusion. Council discussed the idea of the rark and of the positive
aspects of having sueh a parh. Otlier ideas included an indoor swimmin5 pool wiCb or without a teen
center. Dcpury Vtayor Munson then discussed the AWC High Priorities, Ottier Friorities, GMA
' Revisions, and Uther Issues including Streamlined Sales 7'aa:, which were in the COLmcil packet. Viayor
Wilhite sugoested Councilmembers save this section of cheir council packets.for further consideration;
and to send any other legislarives suggrestions to Ciry Clerk I3ainbridge for distrihution to council.
Ueputy Mayor Nlunson indicateci the strategic plarining is scheduled to be held in Olympia Novernbcr 17,
and he would like to have council and staff representation there if possible.
Nlayor Wilhite called for a recess at 7:10 p.m.; and reconvened the meeting at 7:20 p.m.
1lrSCUSSTON: Council laeliberatian: Transportation Chapter of the l7raR Camprehensive Plan.
As a reminder; vlayor 1'Vilhite stated thiit Council last time concurred t:o go througli the goals and policies,
and slie suegested beginning that on page 30 of the Ti-ansportaHon Chapter. Council sttirtecl on page 30
and went though `I'G-1 through TP-9.10, disctiissing sornc and not discussing others where they had no
comments or suggesCeci char►gcs. Couricil chose not to make any clianges to several goals and pUlicies,
and therefore; only those goals a.nd polieies ('1 G-1 through TP-9.10) with rccorrimended chaiiges are
nntetl below. .
Sh•ects :ind Itoxclwxvs Gcrals & Polieies Policies: 'CP-1.1 The followina issues were discussed: how this policy applies to cul-de-sacs, do we want to encourage or
discourage cul-cle-sac; the desirc co havc conncctivity and what thst means, i.e. perhaps the ability to
cocne out of an area, hit some kind of collector and move into another resiclential area; cut-throueh traCCc;
1.3rge planned cornrnuriities f'enced off without adequate access; "dumping" one neigliborhood's h•afTic
into another; that roads mtist be capable of safely dealing wit11 kraffic; the need to h<<ve cievelopments willl
clear access to arte•rials or collectors; and the definition of street types, i.e. principles, minors, aiterials,
and collee[ors. '1'here was Cnuncil ronsensus to amend the policy to read: Street dcsign should
provide for connectivity benveen residential neighborhoods and collectors. We want to and discourage
cut-throtigh traffc.
Policy TI' 2.3 The following issues were discussed: question on how dhis beautification and landscaping
would be paid for, whether by the developer, impact fees, or other means; and whexher to niandate this or
encourage adherence to this policy. There was Council consensus to amend the policy to read:
lHe0Fpet-ate Encourage landscaping, street lighting and beautification in the de,sign standards for local
~ access streets, collectors, and arterials.
~J
Council N4eeting: 11-01-05 Page 3 of4
Approvcd by Couneil:
' Draft
Goal TG-9: There was Council conscnsus to amend thc goal to re.ad: Encourage community livability
' arid transporialion by encoura~ pi-eviding a connected system oC pcdestrian and bicyelc ways that is
integraCed into a coordinaled regional netw~ork.
PolicY TP 9.$ Tlicre wxs Council consensus lo ameiid the pnlicy tp re.ad: lnclude pedc.strian friendlv
facilities such as side,%valks in city street reconstniction and improvement project5, snd require pedestrian
friendlv facilities such as sidewalks aP!-pedesEfisn-feeiiities in all new development.
It wcrs movecl by Co-inicilfnembef• Tuylor, atrdseconcled by Deptily mayar lVItntson to exterrd the meeting to
9:1 ? p.nr. In Favar: Deputy 1VCIVOP Ml.pIS017 atrd Cotnicilmember Taylnr. Upposed: lUr.ryor Wi117ite,
Courtcilmenrhers Schimmels, .Flartigan, Derierlny, ant! DeYlen:iyig. Abslentions: None. jYlolion jcriled Prior to adjournment, it was determined Ihat the starting point for next Council deliberation will be'I°G 10
of the Trtinsportation Chapter.
"Chere beinb no further business, it wus rnoved by Cotitrcilnrember Flanigar7, seconcletl, und w7rnaimourly
crgreed irpon to adjaurrr. Tlte meeling adjouriretl at 9:00 p.m.
Diana Wilhite, Ma?ror
ATTES`1': .
Christine 13ainbridge, City Clerk
Council vleeting: l 1-O1-OS • Page 4 of4 ,
Approvecl by Council:
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
~ Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: November 15, 2005 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business new business ❑ informatian ❑ admin. report X pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 05-027, 2006 Property Tax
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: State Law
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: There has been discussion at study sessions
regarding the anticipated amount of property tax revenue for the 2006 budget. A public hearing
was held on August 23, to review 2006 projected revenues, including the property tax levy. The
first reading of the property tax ordinance was held on September 27. -
BACKGROUND: State law requires the City to pass an ordinance in order to levy property
taxes. The recent annexation of the City into the Library -District has significantly reduced the
amount of properry tax flowing to the city. 'However, the city will no longer be paying for library
services with City of.Spokane Valley tax receipts. The Spokane County Assessor has increased the assessed value of our City to $5.023 billion
which lowers the City's rate per $1,000 of assessed value. The City's tax rate per $1,000 of
assessed value is expected to be between $1.56 which will generate approximately $7.8 million
~ in property taxes) for 2006, and $1.60 which will generate $8 million). The Library District will
0 levy an additional $.50 for library services in our community.
There is no shortage of worthy programs which would benefit from additional tax dollars. Our
multiyear financial projections anticipate a budget deficit in 2009. It would also be wise to add to
our Service Level Stabilization and Civic Facilities Reserves. It should be noted these estimates
are based on the County's latest projections of assessed value. A change in the assessed
value andlor a change in the amount of our proposed levy will change the tax rate. Council should expect a second ordinance confirming the City's desire to levy the 1% increase over the
current year's property tax levy which preserves the 1% increase for future levies.
OPTIONS: This ordinance is required by law. The council could modify the ordinance to levy a .
different tax rate. Each one cent of levy rate, generates $50,000 more/less in property tax
revenue.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: A motion to pass the second reading of the
ordinance levying property taxes in the amount of $8,056,000 (a rate of approximately $1.60/m
of assessed value) for the 2006 budget for fhe City of Spokane Valley is recommended.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: This ordinance levies property tax for the City`s 2006 budget
year. We expect property tax revenues to be near $8.056 million (a decrease of 15%) once
growth in assessed value and state assessed properties have been included. Property taxes
are expected to make up 27% of General Fund revenues,
~ f STAFF CONTACT: Finance & Admin. Services Director, Ken Thompson
. %
_ -
•`'2006 Proposed
- - Property Tax
4rdinance
Spokane Valley Council Meeting
November 15, 2005
,
■ Ordinance required by State Law
■ Three public hearings were held
■ Levy options:
$8.056 million, est. $1.601m
$7.837 million, est. $1.56/m
Others? 1 cent = $50,000
■ Based on County estimates Levy a$ amount, not a rate
■ Multiyear Fin. Plan projects deficits
beginning in 2009
■ Build reserves
~
1
I)I~AFT
~ C11-Y OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SYOK.4,IVE COU\tTY, WASII117GTQN
ORDP 1ANCE NO. 05-027
AN ORDITTA\TCE QF TTTE CITX OF S.PO:KA-iVE, VA1.LEY, WASHINGTON, LEVYIiN(:
TAF REGLTLAR 1'1tOPl:12I'Y TAXES Ia'()R TI3l: CTTY UF SPOKANE VALLEY,
Wr1SIUNGTON i.N SPOKANE COU1~'1'Y F012 I'HE YEr112 COMM-I:NCING
J':'1NUf1[2Y 1, 2006 TQ FRpViT)F RFVFNUF FOR CIT'Y SERVICES AS SLT T+'OltTH
IN THF CITY BUJ)GET.
1~~VI-EkEAS, State law authorizes the City of Spokane Valley to levy reoular propcrt:y taxes upon
the taxable nroperty withiri the corporate limits in order to provide revenue for the 2006 cun•ent expense
budget of the City; ancl
WI-IERi'AS, the City of Spokane Valley is authorized to levy $3.60 per thousand dollaes of
assessed valuation deducting therefrom the hi;hest lcvry collccted by a Fire DistricC ~~~ithin the Spok~uie
Valley city limits and also clecluct:ing the Spokane Valley Library I7istrict levy; and
M-iEREAS, RCW 84.52.020 requires the City Council on or before the 30"' day of.'November to
certify budget estimates t4 the c.lerk of tlae Spokane County Boitrd of Commissioners including amounts
to be raised by taxing property within the IimitS qfthe City; and
. WF-TERrA:S, the City Council pursuant to notice, held public hearings on August 23, 2005 and
~ September 27, 2006 on the proposed budget c.stimatcs .f'or 2006 including revenue sources which will
f'und the provision of City serviees, projects and activities.
NOW, THFRFFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Washington, do ordain as
follows:
Sectian 1. 2006 I...etiy Rate. There shall be and is hereby levied and imposed upon real '
prnperty, personal property and utility property, as defined in RCW ChapCer 84A2 and 34.55.005 in the
City of Spokane Vallep, Washinaton a regular property e,,Lx for the year conunencing January l, 2006 in '
i.he total amount of $8,056,000.00. It is recognized that fire districts are authorized to levy upon property
R'Itlllll the City at a rate of up to S1.50 per ane C.housand dallars of assessed valuation and that the
Spokanc County l,:ibrary faiStrict will levy up to $.50 per one thousand dollars of asscsscd valuation
pursuant to state law. Therefore the tola] levy raCe leviccl by the Ci .ty of Spokane Valley shall not exceed
I$3.60 per one diousarid dollars oC assessed valuation, less the amount of the highest fire distriet: and less
the library clistrict lev.,Lj2s wiChin the city limits of the City of Spokane VaUey.
The reaular property um. leviecl thrnugh this ordinance is for die purpnse of receiving revenue to
mlke payment upon the general indebtedriess of die City of Spokane Valley, the general fund obligations
and for t1ie payrnent of services, projects and aetiviUC:,s for the City during the 2006 calendar year. The
purpose of this ordinance is to establish the levry atnount as permitted by law.
Section 2. \btice to Spol:ane Countv. Pursuanc tn RC\'V 84.52.020, the City Clerk slial]
certif}f to the County Le?islative Audiority a true and eorreet copy of this ordinance, as «rell as the budget
estimates adopced by the City CoLmcil in order to pxovide for and direct the tqxes levied herein that shall
~ be collected and paid to the City of Spokane Valley at the time and in the manner provided by the laws of
the Stitte af Washington.
Ordinanoc 05-027 Propercy Tax 2006 Ynge 1 of 2
n RAF1.
Secrioo 3. Severabilit,,L lf any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance shall ~be held to .be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction; such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall noc affect the valiciity pr constieutionally of any other section, sentence, clause or
phrase oE this ordinance.
Serlion 4. Effective Uate. This Ordinanee shall be in full force and effect fiive (5) days after
publication of (his Qrdinlnce ur a summary thereof i.n the officia) newspaper of the CiCy a.S provided by
law.
f't1SSETa by the CiCy Council this day of , 2005.
Mayror, D13113 WIIFIIIC
t1TTLS1°:
City Cle.rk, Christine T3ainbridge
Approved As To l+orm:
Office ofthe City Att.orney
~
nate of Publictition:
i
Cffective nate: . .
Ordinance 05-027 Propcrty'Par 2006 1'age 2 of 2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
~ . Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: November 15, 2005 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent old business new business public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report X pending legislation -
AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 05-029 Adopting 2006
Budget
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: State budget law requires the city to adopt the budget by
ordinance. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Public hearings on the proposed budget for 2006
were held on August 23, September 27 and October 11. There have been many discussions
on the 2006 budget at council meetings during the last three months. The first reading of the
2006 budget ordinance was on October 18.
OPTIONS: The City Council could elect to delay the second reading of the budget ordinance
for several days and schedule this item for a later council meeting. The -Council could also
conduct the second reading at the November 15, council meeting. Once the budget ordinance
~ is passed we need to allow at least a week to make final arrangements and to deliver it to
~ Spokane County.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: A motion to approve Ordinance 05-029 Adopting the
2006 Budget
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Once passed this will be the adopted budget for 2006_
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Thompson, Finance/Administrative Services Director
~ ~
nRAFr
~ C1TY OF ST'OKANF VALLEY
SPOICANE COUNTY, WASFl11TGTON
ORDINANCE \°O. 05-029
AN (712llliNANCE OF TAF C[TY OF Sl'O1Ct1x\'E VAT..LEY, SFOKANE COUNTX,
WASUi.NGT01°, ADOl'TING A RU[)GFT FUR THE T'ERIOD JANUr1RY 1, 2006
TH1tOlIGH DEC.F,`Tf3ER 31, 2006 AYYR01'RiATT.NG I'iJiNDS A1VD ES'1AKLTSRTIYG SALARX SC.HFDULES FOlt ESTABLISAFD POSITIONS. .
\NrBEREAS, Statc law requires the City Managcr to prepare a preliminary buclget for the City of
Spokane Valley at least sixty (60) cfays before the beginning of the CiCy fisc.al year beginning January 1,
2006 and endin5 December 31, 2006; and 1'1'H:E.KEAS, the Ciry lvianager in consultation with the Pinanee Director and 17epartment Heads has
prepared and placed on file with the City Clerk a preliminary budget eogeCher witli an estimate of the
amoun[ af money necessary to meet the expenses of the City including paymenf of ou2standing
obligations; and
NN'HERCAS, notice was postecl anci publ.ishcd on September 9z 16 and October 7, 2005 that the City
Council in the City of Spolcane Valley would rneet and receive public comment in the City Cnunc;il
Chambers prinr Co the aclopkion of the budget; and NV-IFR.rAS, following the filing of the preliminary budget wich the City Clerk, notice of the same
and three hearings on the budget, the City Council desire,s lo adoEat the 2006 budiet; including all
~ allnwanees and an appropriation for eaeh funcl so that a balanced budget, where appropriatiQns are limited
to the estimated revenues, is adopted for the City.
NQW, Tl-iEfZE1=012.E, the Cit:y Council of the City of Spokiuie VaIley do ordain as follows: Seclinn 1. Adoption of 2006 $uclp
get. Thc budget for the City of Spokane Valley for the year 2006
is hereby adopted <<s the balanced nudget of the City wiCh appropriatiAns limited tn the total cstimated
revenues nF the City. The final budget for 2006 is aCtached liereto and by diis rePerence is incorporated
herein pursuant tn RCW 35A33.075. ror suinmary purposes, the Yoctil estimatcd appropriations for each
separate fund plus the aggrcgate total for all such funds is sct forth as follows:
FUND Al'1'ROPRIr1TION
GEtNERA.1., HUNL7 $29,885,641 ,
SIREET FLND - 4,131,256
AR7'EftIAL STFtLLT FUND 568,655
TItt1ILS & PA1'HS.FUND .23;053
HOTEIJN40TEL FUiN[7 400,667 .
DE}3T SFRVECE LTGO 03 600,000
C.4PIT4L PROJEC'1'S FIND 1,210,000
SPECIAL CF1l'1°1 AT. PR.O.TECTS T'IJND 1,070,711
STftEE"1' CAI'ITAL PROJECTS FUND 8,385,843
N,MAt3EAU PO1NT CAP[TAL FUNll 783,205
STREE°1' }30NTa CAPI"fAL FUND 902,460
CD BLOCK CTRANT FCJND -0-
CAPl'1'A C. GRANTS PUND 8,211,000
' BARKCR BRiDGE F1:Ia~RA! FiND 553;000
STORNIWATER ti1t1NAG6MENT I'UNIll 1 621,534
Ordinancc 05-429, r'utnual rlppeonriaEion Ordinanee 2006 1'ags I of 2
T)RAI-'I' PARKS CAP17'AL PROJE-CTS FIJNT) 1,300,000 - -
%
C LJ[F'MENT R&I't FUNT) 693,257 _
R.ISI: ,VIANAGEMENT FUND I89,939
f2,L°'SERVES
CIVIC EACII,ITIES PROJ. 1,100,000
CEN"I`H F7J'LACE 300,000
' Sk:RViCC LEVE L 1,000,000
1VINTER N1'EA'I'HF, R 500,000
TOTAL APYROPTtIATiONS $63,435,223
The total balance of all funds appropriated fnr rhe year 2006 is $63;435,223
Section 2. Positions and Salarv Schedules. The various positions and salary ran-es for City
T:mployees are attached to this Ordinance as AppendiY "A."
Section 3. `l"ransmittal of ]3udget, A comptete copy of the budget as adopted, together widi
a copy of this Ordinance shall be transmitted by the City Clerk to the Division of Municipal Corporatinns
in the Office of the State Auditor imd ehE t\ssociation of Washington Cities. Section 4. Severability. Tf any section, sentence, clause or ph.rase of ch.is ordinance shall be
held t:o be invalid or tulconstitutional by a court arcompetent.jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not a1'fect the validity or constitiitionaliCy of any othcr section, sentence, clause or
phrasc of this ordinance.
Sectiun 5. Ftfective Uate. 1'his Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after ~
the date of publication of'this Ordinance or a summary thereof in ihe off icial newspaper of the City.
PASSE[7 by the City Couneil this 15`N dayo of November, 2005.
Diana Wilhite, Vlflyor
ATTE4ST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
Appruved As To Forru:
Off ee of the City Attorney
Dale of'Publication:
Ef.1.'ective Date:
,
Ordinsince 05-029, Aiinual Appropriatien Ordinancc 2006 Page 2 of 2
Appendix A
~ EMPLOYEE POSITION CLASSIFICATION
MONTHLY SALARY SCHEDULE
2006 Salary Schedule
Position Title Grade 2006 Range
Ci Mana er Unclassifed .
De u Cit Mana er 21 $ 7 020 - $ 9,000
Ci Attorne 21 7,020 - 9,000
Communih Devela ment Director 21 7,020 - 9,000
Finance Director 21 7,020 - 9,000
Public Works Director 21 7 020 - 9,000
Parks and Recreation Director 19 5,686 - 7,290
Cit En ineer 19 5,686 - 7,290
Plannin Mana er 18 5,118 - 6,561
Buildin Official 18 5,118 - 6,561
Senior En ineer - Ca ital Projects Develo ment 18 5,118 - 6,561
Senior En ineer - Traffic, CIf' Plannin lGrants 17 4,606 - 5,905
De u Cit Attome 16 4,145 - 5,314
Cit Clerk 16 4145 - 5,314
En ineer 16 4,145 - 5,314
Senior Planner 16 4 145 - 5,314
Accountin Mana er 16 4,145 - 5,314
Senior Plans Examiner 16 4,145 - 5,314
IT S ecialist 15 3,731 - 4,783
Associate Planner 15 3 731 = 4,783
Assistant En ineer 15 3,731 4,783
Public Works Su erintendent 15 3,731 - 4,783
CenterPlace Coordinator 15 3,731 - 4,783
Human Resource Anal st 14 3 358 - 4,305
AccountanUBud et Anal st 14 3,358 - 4,305
Administrative Anal st 14 3,358 - 4 305
Assistant Planner 14 3,358 - 4,305
Buildin Ins ector II 14 3,358 - 4,305
- Plans Examiner 14 3 358 - 4,305
, GIS Technician 14 3,358 - 4 305
Public Information Ofiicer 14 3,358 - 4,305
En ineerin Technician 14 3,358 - 4,305
Senior Permif S ecialist 14 3,358 - 4,305
MaintenancelConstruction Ins ector 13-14 3,022 - 4,305
Recreation Coordinator 13-14 3,022 - 4,305
Code Eniorcement Ofifiicer 13 3,022 - 3,874
Buildin Ins ector I 13 3,022 - 3,874
Plannin Technician 13 3,022 - 3,874
De u Ci Clerk 12-13 2,720 - 3,874
Senior Center S ecialist 12-13 2,720 - 3 874
Administrative Assistant 11-12 2,448 - 3,487
Permit S ecialist 11-12 2,448 - 3,487
Accountin Technician 11-12 2,448 - 3,487
R4ainfenance Worker 11-12 2,448 - 3,487
~ Office Assistant U 10-11 2,203 = 3,138
Office Assistant I 9-10 1,983 2,824
Recreafion Assistant 5 1,301 - 1,668
crr~~ ~
ne
,;oOValle
~
~~~~L.. ~ ~ _ ~ ~r~ ~ f _ r~. 1 - ' _ . ,
- '
~ ~ ° `*i~~ i.~ , ~ _ ~
Y .
- r
~ ' t ~ - Lt ~ _
I + ~
ml Y - ~
I
a~V '
- ' - - . . -
_ ~ . ~ a=C•`-_'. ~~'~5-•=~ ' . _ ' e _ _ _~_~r .
- - c • ~ ~ - _ _ - -
OCCf1tCFPhMX aC Mk8b"U pAi'k
' 2006
~
' Preliminary Budget
~
Ci R I. \IF SPV..KA.1 •-E ViLJL.:.J JL - 2006 BVifVEi
Table ot ConteAte
Budget Meesov
C0~edmcmkers & Staff 1 '
City Manager Btdget Message ~
Budget G4ide
Abou[ tbe Budget & I.he Budgct Pmcess 10
Spokanc Vallcy Budgefi PoCicies 13
Basis, ofAccounting sud Budgcd:ng 14 ~
Fxplaaation vF Revenue Sources 16
Budget Sunmary
Revenue Asswnptions 20
Ex.pe-ncliturre Assumptions 21
l3udget Summary 22
CCt..evmucs by "1'}pe 2-3
t~meral Fund Revenue Sources Clart 24
City - '4Vide Revenuc Sourm Chart 25
ietaiT Rcvenues by 'r}~~ 26
Eacpenrdjatres by Departrnent 29
Genc] Fund Fxpenrlitures by Dewiment byType 30
CxneraJ Fund Expenditures by Deparinent Chart 31
GeneTBJ Fund Cxpendi#aues by 'T}►pe Clart 34
F-xpeatlitutes
Get'iera! Fund:
UgisMvc Bramh 33
Ex+ecut.ive & Iegis1alive Support 35
Public Safety 37
CiDnluct Ex;penditu= Chati 39
C_?pera#ian~ ~ Adn3inislrutive Services 40
Public Works 44
1'laanin~ & Cornmuaity Devetopmnfi 46
Pari:s & Recreatir~n 49
General !Crove=nen! 54
AJ:.I Other Fuiyls:
Strect Fund 55
Attzr" S1r~~ Fund 56
'Fmfls & Paths Fund 56
IloteUMotel Fund 57
CenterPIwe (VL-r',~ting RL-sme Fund 58
SeMc:e Ievel Stabilizatton Reser~vc Fund 58
Winter Weatler Reser+re Fund 59,
C[TY OF SPOKANF. VALLEY - 2006 B[IDGE'i'
Tsblc uf Contents
vebt Servicc Funds 60
Capital Projects & Spocial Capital Yrojects Funds 61
Stroct Capital Projects Fund 62
Mirabeau Poini Capital Project Fund 63
Street f3ond Fund 63
Capital Cn-ants Fund 64
fiarkcr Bridgc - Ped Grant Fund 64
Parlcs Capital Projccts I'und 65
Civic Buildings Capital Project Fund 65
StormwaLer Management Fund 66
f:quipment RentAl & Replncement Fund 67
Risk M►iruigcmcnt Fund GS
City Pcofilc & Ut6er Budget Information
(.;cgcral Fund Capital lsxpenditures 69
All Otber Ftmds Capital l":xpenditures 70
Pasition Listing by Dcpartmcnt 71
Full 'I'ime Equivalent Count by Ycar 72
2005 Workfarcx Comparison 73
Commttnity Profile and History 74
Employce Salary Schedule 77
I?ebt Service Schedule 78
(ilo.-,wy 79
C1TY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
City Council Members
Disna Wilhite, Msyor Richard Manson, Deputy
Position #l Position #S
Stephen Taylor Mic6ael Flanigaa
Posidon #2 Positian 116
Mic6ael DeVleming Richsrd Denenny
Position #3 f'osition 97
Gary Sc6immels
f'osition #4
Staff
David Mercier, City Manager
Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager
Kenneth Thompson, Finance & Administrative Services Director
Marina Sukup, Cotnmunity Development llirector
Michaei Jackson, Parks & Recreation Director
Neil Kersten, Public Works Director
Michael Connelly, City Attorney
Thomas Scholtens, Building Official
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
1
S t H
POK,ane
lley
City Mernager's Budget Message
Annual Rud'get F'ar
Fiscal Yerrr 2006
Dear Cifizens, Mayarand City Caurtcil of Spokane Valley.
9t is my pit:asure to pm-senk tlie budget document for lltc fsa year ofL006, wluch represents k.he
combEned efforts of the City Cour~cil, gtrff and ciki-zzns. 'f his ye.ar, ihe CiEy CoLmci1T Plsru3ir~g
Conaaiissia~n arrd cilifxns gavc much atcentiurt to establi-shin~ a City of Spokane ValIeY Valucs
Statemcnt thas will guide City gnvernment, Iht►ve inw[uded the producl ar their efforts Iterc for
yoaw° considera#ion.
Druff Vision
'.A cumnunity afi opptirturtity where individual:; ant! i'arni.lies c4:n gac~w and play. ajsd businc.sses
will t"l+nkirish and prospc;r,"
Ot'r nf SpoAane Valley Valu~s
CQmmunity ld+rntity and F'ride, 4pKikane Valley pmmotes an c.nv`rrmmicni thmi supports the
home and farn4ly, andjob and educa#ion i}pIx)rtunitir-s. ~
~
Ffig4~lignt
• A rrienc~ly, whc~lesa~ne, saf`~ pl+~c~ to li+~e and ruis+e a ' • _
t`amily
• A city (zoter and ecconc►QrGieally hotlthy. div+erse . , `dowotciwwi asea _ r
~ reserv~~~n o~ ne1~~rhood'!`e i'YIZfFQRTii41& l.kbi :W~
Fvcus on lhe Futrure. Spokane VaJley is a visia]rrary city encourraging iis ciEizcns and their
govtkm-nacnl to took to lfic fu~ure beyortd thc present genciration, and in bring such ideas to ptiblic
discussion, cnFwnctng a semse of conimunity identily.
~
Eligliliglit arcas:
• A bnlanced approach to gmwth and dcvclopmcnt ' Z
• Stcwardship of land and n;sources, such as parks, .
recrcation and nntural arcas - ~
•('reservatian and grow~th of thc cconomic and ~.cc~mmercial jc►h basc of the comm~lnily ~ ' " ; • . .
►
dOW
ClR![TNO[.Y. /7 /mJ!)IIOl gatistrft /'i"E
ia..~ r~•~ OPen, C:ollaborative GovernmenL Spwkanc
►i~ ~ i ~ v :
Valley vF►lues a "user-friencily" government, in
which gavcrnnncc pracliccs and gencml
opcrations c:on.sidcr how citizens will bc scrvcxi
in the tnost rcsMnsive, effectivc and caurteaus
mnnner.
A!.'tHtwr.natum wirh tfr t wiewromn•
r tighrgt,~ areA►.S:
• Citizen pariiciExition in the decision-mnking praces.c.
• Strategic usc of public/private arxd othcr partrterships.
• A Can-Do uttitudc on the part of City employces, and fair and cansistent interpretation of
regulatians.
Budget ttighlig/ils
The 2006 budget wntinues to recognize the dynamic and changing environment within which
the City must operate. 'Ibc budget pnu;es.s hsis been used to reinforce the City's commitment tn
delivering its core scrvices, and the budget dcx;ument was built around funding a sct of services
and investments consistent with thai core mission. A sumrnary of key hudget highlights for the
C'outtcil tind communitN's rrvirw is as !'ollows:
Revrnue: Grnt/e Gm►vtb: Rcvenuc prajections tor the 2006 fixal year iu.ive teen incr<a.tiLYl
to ac;count far itu:n;au:d sales tax nceipts tuid for thc brisk building ac:civity
axsociated with an economic rebound in aur region. "Me City's six-year financial
forec,ast shows amservativc revenue gmwth bcyond 2006; hawevcr those
estimatcs will lluctuatc acrvrding to chtuiging trends in thc a:unomy.
L'i pen.ce: Moderotr Grow[h ix Cierrtnt Operaliono! Grpensts:
lnvcsting in the essential core sc.•rvices identified by the ,
Council and community crcates baseline costs that are
curn~ntly gmwing at a higher rate than tax revenuc:s. _
Evcn with a rcmnrkebly small intcrnal staff, crcdible -
pmgratnming reyuires an investrnent in basic capai:ity to ~
orx:rale. As thc City moves thmugh its start-up phase,
tlueshulJ ixrsAmncl custti, tlie prics: of upcraiing supplies
~
axl charges for contract services havc begun to deesralate from R% to 6%
annuiilly. 'tlW improval tn.nd line may dccline further as we appmuch year end.
Fcx extur►plc, the l.egislature chose to refinattcc the cost of thc puhlic employre
n,-tircment system at a lesser rate than previously planncd.
Copda!
Inv+fftnrrnts: Swccessfu! Grantsnwasbip Puys DivJdards: City .
staff is nctivciy pwsuing funding commitments from
othcr sources to help pay far the cost nf ncodcci
capital improveme.~nts --roeds, bridges and parks-
that bencfit the community. The 2(}06 capital
canstruction progrnm totals S 10287,000, of wtiich the
City will cantribute S1,135,004 or just 11°/a
Slrerll'urrd: .S1atr Funding of toer xoadw►Qy Maiiilenawct
t/nchanged: This fund dcrivcs iL5 revenues fmm en
allocatioa of the state Motor Fucl l'ttac distributed to B,,,.ke,Road g,i*t
eities und towns. Currenlly the City rec:eives only
about $1.2 million or about 300/o af the funds neecird to pay fnr strcct maintenancc
activitics tikc snow plowing, polhole repair, resw'Facing eroded lancs, sweeping,
weed cnntrol, street (ighting, traIIic signals and stAte road.ti and a varic:ty of other
repairs. Aps tax increase passed by the: Legislature as part of a transportatian
package wnuld prnvide an estitnetcd $350,000 uf additioonl rcvenuc. I towewcr, a
siatewide ballot meastue rc-penling the l,egislnturc's transportation tax packagr
wiU bc voted an in Novcmber. The problem facing Spokane Valley far lhe
foreseeable futwe will bc closing lhnt gap betwecn street related revenucs and
wsts. Clcarly, n.~duced cxpcnditwm-s would result in noiiceable diffen;nccs in the
canditions of local strL-e:t:►.
StrMt Rmd - Oper+tlrq Fir4enwes/6cPe,dtw~s
8,000,000
7.000.000
6.OOO.C100
5.000.000
4.000,000
3.Q00,000
2.000,000
1.000,000
2008 2007 2008 2009
Reretue 6cpendRure
4
Oirre.~nt F'isral }eur ttt Review:
flhe second full ycar of aperating the Washington's newest city hss bccn challenging and
rLwaniing. Citizens, ncighbors and pagsers-by hnve joinod in the discussions at Council
meetings, Pianninb Cammis.5ion hearings and gatheriogs around the community providing their
vicws on the broad range of issucs nlivr in the cily. 7hc City Council eppfauds inclu.sive public
involvement thai helps form the cammunity vision, values and mission thsit will be reliecl upon iw
rraching the Ciry's potentiaL The group learning has been enjoyable, the workload heavy and
the cffoct satisfying. Despitc the demands c:reateci by the dynamic:s of change, the City aehieveii
substantial pmgress in mccting the ZUQS buJgei goals.
Prngress irr.•1ltuini►rcnl ojl/iesix (h) ;tlnjnr Goal.s cf2UOS:
Adoptiun of Spoknac Vailev's First C'omprehensive Plan in compliance with the rcquirements
of Lhc (imwth Management Act, ineiuding :in accepied vision statement, documentation oC lancf
use; goals in support of that vision, and identification af significant transportniion system gaals
linkeci to implementatian of the Plnn.
: f clraft vi.rion stutemenl wa.s creuted ' A communiry nl uppvrtunity where indrrrduals anr! jamllies cun grow and plu1 t
crnd businesses wrll Jlorwi.sh and prnsper. " A scienti~icull i
rulid survev oJ cummunUy uttitudes und perceptivm wu~
commissioned anri the results shcrred with the cummunity. f ive•
(S) wrll ulteraled neighharhood cltizen purticiptrtion meetings ~
►vere held araund the City. Numeroux druft documents werc
lirepared ►o stimulute discussions abnu[ fundumenlal issue.s fctc'ing the communiq1. Public participativn hw been routinelti
.
.colicited anJ citizen jeedbark received ,51aff issued u DruJt
C'omprelrensive 1'/wr documenl for public cuna-umption ond -
e•ummrntary. The I'/vnnlrrK C'ummi.ssion hus herld numerous -
hecuings und is clelihrrctting their rE•rmmmerrclciriurtr !v Council.
F:nactment of s tinifonn Uevelanmcnt Cudc that collutcs all of the Ciry clevelopment related
regulations into a singie, undetstandable nference t.htat stm,amlincs the permitting pnncess and
Facilitates cusiomcr service and busine.ss develupment.
C'odification of a Unifnrm Developmenl ('ode must jollaw in sequenre the
vdoption of a C.'omprehensrve Plu» in vrder ta arsure conforming omong City
polrcie.c. llowever, lhe"architecture" ojlhe code has heen drfinrd und alluculed
in the,Spokane Vullry MuniciJwl Code mvaiting fulJillment.
Ideatificxtioa of the Elemuila ut a Siu-1'ear titrateQic Finxncial !'lan relving on the
incmusing body af current financial infarmation and accompanying rcvised focecasts of rcvenues
iuid expc;nses.
;
I
A six =►Jear forerus! uf Ihe C:ity :s frnunc'ia! heulth was made to creutc cr snupshvt of
the City's long-lerm fiscal canditinn so that lvduy 's harlget cJuiices are nvt naJe
withaut uwareness ojlhe frnancial trends thut afj'ect ihe susralrred tffardahillty 1W
publir services. S7aff wvrlFed in clvse ca►u-ullutlon with the Finance ( vmmittee
and the City C.ouncil exanrinfng a variety njexpenditure reduction and revenue
eiejuincement scenarios in search vJa jornrulu Ihat would suppart currenu servlre
levels irrta thr future. 1'he forecarst is rexularly upcfvted to cupture current
injarmation usefud in decisian makinR. AJlhough improved frnanciul ciura has
heen incnrporated, 1he frndings still shaw, a slructural imhulunce between
revenues and expeitses with which we mu.tit reckon.
Advancement of tbe Interesta ot Snokine Valkv tfiroue6 Effestwe Eztcrnal RrlatioDs such
as building a canswctive relatiuruhip with the newiy-camposed Boarcl of c-ouncy
Cammissioncrs; pariicipaLng as full mcmbcrs of cegional and
statewicie haards and Cummissions whase wnrk affect: the quality of ~ -
life in thc wmmunity, anci by advocating City issues with
neighboring jurisdictioas, municipal organizalions, the [.egitlature
and Congress.
~
(:'ouncrl Members serve on 27 regivnal boards urrcl :
cummissinns. 13oth Cvuncil and sta,[j iurve initiuled and
maintained conlarl with their counlerpcuts Ivcu!!v, stalewicle
l
ard nativrmlly ubcrut 1he issues that matler most ro,S'pokanc
i'ulley. The eity rrianager alteadx weekly bricfing sessions
hetween C'ounty staffund Corrmissioners in an efforl to buil(l ~
e.ffective and informecl relllflOlLSf11pS ehui /rud to C(7/IJ'Ir1ICl11~t.'
C
. 11M~ i7Ur lChI3b11lN.t
snluJions far City issues.
ColtabarxtiQn wii6 WA.stewater DiuharPCrs and Regulntocv AECneies in pursuit of iaterim
:►nd lotig-term resolutions tc) water quality and wastewater trc:atmcnt capacity concxrnti, so that
economic developmcnt and natursil resowves continue to suppwrt the vitality of the m-gion.
An increrlihle cn►roeurt oj linie and energy by C:ouncil mui stu,(j were hrvested in
review of potentially worknble interrm anut lvng-runge solutions 10 WO.SleN'Gfer
lrealmenl prohlems. SignifiranJ angoing cn!luhoration wtth Ihe xpecinim uj
interested parlie.ti consumes the uttention of Council and titaff
(ililEe in un effort tc) pravtctr security for tite economir
develop►nent and nruru-ul resaurces vi[al to liee reginn.
Stukehaldrr altftucies me 6eginning to shift toward sohuinn
oriented upxions, rulher thvn customurv pnsrtinning un
becsiness and environmental issues as fhe search jor hulislir
answer.r cvntinaes.
- . Cetablishment o! A formnl Citv-wide cnstamer aervicc nroerxm
with emphasis un timely resparse, u uscr-friendly atmosphere, arid
'-M {an attitude of ftu:ilitation and accommodatian within thc bounds, of
re:;ponsibility, integrity. and linancial r,apability of the City.
r. OMunad re ~M cmuoswr Wnw e
6
llll:IUlI111L.' 111'g:llll/.alllIflill all)d JUt) 1.~1'4C17j)L1U11 l~Ul-Lllill:lli~ 1\Il{1C F)III~UIII~, i1l"t `~i.:~i:t'~
CUSIOiTICr SCNICe.
Yleuse see the ructomer service seclion hiRhliRhJed below.
Tlre Bud,t,elfor I'isrul Yenr 2006
Balancecl Budget Adopted:
Thc ''()()b hudget is in halunce; expcnses have been limited so as not to exceed known or
rcasonably predictable re:vcnues. Gtad tidings of juy were hcard amund City Flall in l)ecember
2004 when the stari-up interfund laun of $3.69 million requir+ed to fund the first year af City
oprrutions was stnmped PAID IN FLILL. Continuing thgt gaod fortune, this new budget is
drsigneci to produce a positive fuad tatancc a yeaz cad. ln punuit of that outcome, special
attcntion was given Io limiting the gmwth in ncw programs and financial cummitmcnts while
City rcvenue and expenditure pattcrns stabilize. This approaCh allows availabie resaurces to be
put towanl sustaining services eonsistent with Gouncil's priorities for 2006 and beyond.
Departmeai Achievements: Ench of the Gity's departments undertook
( :in aggressive wark program in 2005. Tbc budget document c:untaiii,,
, Rr
, descriptions of iheir accompiishments for the year and their goals t~ ,
~ next ycar. 1 inviLc residents to take a few minutcs to acquui,.
chemselves with the cfforts madc lry municipal cmployccs (in
beltalf. I Ieavc to the departmrnt heads thr rlea-sum nf sharir. ~ .
• ,:ccomplishm~_ w , ..r•.~+ „ , . . ,
No new pmii inilti '!fl f'vl{Ut"It'lj 1l1i+ \U:{1' W, 1%, e' ~ill% c I(i :Idl 1lfl
k/urnni<iag (H1P cUrn•nr craj~'inK dcmands ot a city that hag Rrown to 85,010 pE'0~lu.
I'hc City L'ouncil w:LS rLSponsive to perwonnel needs thxt arose in 2005 a5 tiun1e ouGti►Lic sc;n i, .
providers chcwse not to rcnew contmci.4 with the City and as the municipal organi7ation adaptt."
its stafY'ing Icvcls w-ithin the confines of uvailablc revenue. As we pass thmugh the formgtii.,
stages of incorparrition, this City has tnken a wnservutivc apprcaach to adding new City staff. :1
2005 survey of 33 full service and contract Washington cities with pnPultiiions greater ttuil
30,000 revealled an average count of 819 full-time cmployees nnd 47 part-time cruployees. II~
c:omparison, Spokanc: Vallcy cantracted tior many s~,~rviccs and employed jusl 60 full-time and 3
part-time employees. [Please see thc attachcd 2005 Work Force Compxirisan.]
Oislnmer ,Ser►•ire ,S'erlion
Maintaining a stmng customer servicc oricntatiun iti a hallma.rk of the City's approaeh lo
rcndering probmrns and s~,•rviccs authorized by the City Council on the behalf of residents.
i•r;',ri/ ,/•,!ir)i.~' ~'r'r;•• nr•rle-.)'~771i 17~•ll'17111:1r Md'IC.r?1'lljf',l►ti'(!::
• Jnh descriptiun rrvisrans urul new employee orierttation meetings highlighting our
cu.stonter .rervice pursuit,s.
• Lk,cuntentwion oJ 12 steps uj C'reslonier Cure und attrihules oj cusromer jriendlv
governnitnJ.
• F.mployee trotning in c•untmtuucatirnLr skills, puhlic• recnrcis reyue.sts. roncurrency
standards and S1ate F.irvirumnenta! Policy Act requiremenls jar developrnent activittes.
• Recep!lvnists anc! .4dministrvlive Assistants servrng as jnyful greelers ro c•uslomer.c
ranracting the Crty.
• Ongoing customer surveys in the Building 1)epurnrre►u and .
: . ► le.
rnonlhly re•pnrt.s !o Cvuncil on feedback cards.
• Intense system reviews ro impruve turnaround time in /he, ' ' '
corirmercial pernritting prncrsc anrl fallnwed up by stntl .o
recommendalions for improvenrenLs. p . . .
• Ongoing unalysis and trai»ing reRarding the Bindr,~y Sirc,
f'lan prores,s.
• Public Injarraation OJ)lcer',e assfstance with the redc-A1;,11; Integrity
websile content mtd prepcrrerlrrm n( iirJ0rmctlrn►titl hroe•litsrc,"W=
(sibm reguJutlunv el u1.) Respcinsiveneiss
•Employees rouline/), displai rng <1 pn.51tr►,e, reapec'rfttl rt!lritirlt,
loward cuslonrtrs, wheliter in person, an the relepJwne or
rammunicali»g in writirrg.
• lltaintenance of a pleasant work place enviroirment jor custonsers to du husines ti in-u
genervlly upbeat pluce to visil.
• lncreased staff levels lo hetter marlaRe tlre wnrkflow and rmprove the timeliness nj
respvnces 1o ctrsfamPrs.
As rlte C.'ity .Mcvtvger, 1 am proucl vj the high level vJ custumer servlcc readilv eviderit rn the
organization and the strides evpryone i.r nraking to keep gelting hetter artd hetter.
Goo! Stnlenrent 2006:
'I'he Principal ZOOb Budget Goals
Tlir 2006 budget reflecLS the distributicm of r+esc►urccs consis-tent with the Council's
detcrminatiun of core servic:cs priocities. The following goals rcpresent just the vcry bmad areas
of concentrution important to the well being of the community.
praft a welWtt'~ptd Street Mauster Plan. witb Fundin¢ Options, that identifies the current
conditiun of city strecis and recommends approprintc improvements and mAimcnance that
preserve the value and swctural integrity of the Iccal transportation sy4tem.
lnitiate the First Pbasc ot the Saneuc Corridor RcvitalizaNon Ptannine between University
and the freevvgy by contracting with a cc►nsultunt to dcsign a strntc~.*y tiwt wuuld strengthcn the
ecomomic viabiliry of the corridor.
9
C'nntinue Moaitoriny, Si aifieant Wastewater leaues including govemance of wa.Stcwater
fac:ilitics, enhuncc-ci eitizen awurcncss of options for the futurc and pursuit of the most c;tTicient
and ecnnomical use of tillowed wastewater discharges.
Maintaiu s Strone Finahaais on Internal and Ezternal Commuaication utili•r.ing the Pubtic
Informatian Oflicer and department ht-ad positions to enhance the yuality, timeliness and
as;curacy o1' internal dialague and the information provided to citizen.ti about citv is.tiues,
initiatives and work plans.
Fznlurc the Availxblc Tclccommunicationa Infrastrurture that mtty be acc:es.tied by public
intititiitians, rtisidents and businesses within Spokanc Vallcy.
Arknnwledgmenls:
In clasing, it has tx;cn a plcasurc to work witli the Council an(l
individual City departmcnts to usher this annual budgci in its eariiest
stages. 1 took forwanl to working with the City's team aver the
coming year to drliver to the citizens oF Spotcane Valley the serviccs it
funds. l genuinc;ly appreciate the citiixn1 of Spokaae Valley, the City
Cuuncil, and the individual staff memhers who have madc it Ixissible '
• f
i'or the City to sucecssfully evolvc, swmplc its potential and worl: s~
toward a bright future. F.veryone involved cantinutis to give
genc,rou.tly uf their lime and energy during this period nf rapicl
formation of community identity and program.ti, and have risen to the
mttny challenges facing a young cnterpmse. Thanks also for the
patience and feedhack from the mnny citi•r.ens who have shown interest CrnkrrUx a wwcr,yamr
or volunte~.~red their timc in activitieti tc) impmve the yiiality of life in
Spokane Vullcy.
Rcspc:ctfulty,
I)avid Mercicr, City Munpger
9
Spo`~kane .
;0O.Valley
11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 49206
549.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhallQspokanevalley.org
.
TO: David Mercier, City Manager and Membcrs of Council
]FROM: 1Cen Thompson, Finance & Administrative Services Jairector
DATE: July 27, 2005
SUBJECT: About the F3udget and the Budget Process
The budget includcs the fina,ncial planning and legal authority to obligate public funds. Additionally, the budget provides significant poliey d'uection by the City Council to the
staf.f and community. As a result, the City Council, staff and public are invoived in
Establishin,g the budget For the City of Spokane Valley. The budget provides four fuz►ctions: .
1. A Folicy Document
The budget functyans as a policy document in that the ciecisions made within the budget
wil.l ref.lect the general principlcs or plans that guide the actions taken for the fuYure. As a
policy doeument, the budget makes specific attempLs to link desired goals and policy
direclYOn lo the actual day-to-day activities of the City staff. .
2. An Operaiional Guicie
The budget of the City reflects its opErabon,. Activities of each City fiuiction and
organization have been plan.ned, debated, formalizcd, and described in the following
sections. This process will help to, maintain a.n understanciing of the various ogeratiUns oF
the City and how they relate to each other and to the attainment of the policy issues and
gaals of the City Council. ' .
3. A Link with the Geueral F'ublic . . The budget provides a unique opporcunity to allozv and cncourage public review of City
opcrations. The budget desc:ribes the activities of the City, the reasan Ur causc for those
activities, future implications, and the direct relationslup to the eitizenry.
4 A Legallv Requued Financial Planning Tool
The budget is a financial planning tool, which, has been its most traditional use. I,n this
. light, preparing aud adopting a budget is a State law requirement of all cities as stated, in
I itle 35A of the Revised Code of Washington (RCtiV). The budget must be adopted as a - balaneed buciget and must be in place prior to the beginning of the CiTy's f~.~scal year. The
' budget is the legal authority to expend public moneys and controls those expenditures by
,
limiting thc.amount of the appropriation at the fiznd level. The revenues of the City are
10
estimated, along with available cash cany-forward, to indicate funds available. The
budget takes inta account unforeseen contingencies and providcs for the need i'Ar periociic '
adjustments. Year 200613udizet Process -
T'he City of Spokane Valley opcrates on a calendar year basis. I.t udlizes an incremental
budgeti.ng approach lhat assumes, for mUSt functions of government, that the current
year's budget is indicative of the base required for the following year. Any increases are
incremental and basccl on necd de:f.ined by the organization's budgct poli.cics, emezging
issues, Council goals, and available resources.
The formal budget planiung begins in the spri.ng with discussions between the City .
Manager, and City Council duri,ng a mid-yeaz retreat. Follnwing the retreat, the City
Manager and the 17epartment Directors preparc the preliminary budget ba.sed upon. the
City Council prinrities. The Ciry Council reviews the preliminary budget beginning in
September.
Tn June, departments prepare requests for new staff, pzograms, or significant increases to
their current year budget that will address eiuerging issues and other operational nceds.
In their requests, the depactments identi,fy the problem that they aee hying to address, the
recommerided solution, iniplementatinn plan, projected cost and expec;ted oirtcomes. I"he
Finance Department and City Manager conduct an analysis of the departmental base
budgets and the revenue outlook for the coming ycar to detcnnine the availability of funds for any new in.ityadves. Iauring June and July, the departments also develop their " ba5e budgets. These budget requests are subm.itted to the Finance laeparlment by the
midclle of July.
Tn early August, the City Manager revielvs each departTnent's- budget requests and develops a preli.minary budgEl recommendation. As mandated by IZCW 35A.33.135, the first requiremenc is that the City Manager submit
estimated reverrues and expendituzes to the City Cou.ncil on or before the fi.rst Moaday in
Uctober. 1fie prcliniinary budget is pressented to the City Council in late Septcmber or early October. Public hearici.gs are held to obtai.a taxpayers' comments, and revisions as
applicable, are made. The Council makes its acijustmcnts to the prelimi.nary budget and
adopts by nrcii.nance a f nal balanced -budget no later than Iaecember 31. The final
operating budget as adopted is published, distributed, and made available to the public
during the first three months of the following year. A.fter the budget is adopted, the City eaters a budget i.mplementaf:ion and monitoring
stage. "I'hroughout the year, expenditures are monitored by the Finance Departmcnt and
department directors to ensurc- that funds are withi.n the approved budget. Finance
provides 6nancial updates to the City Council to keep them current with the City's
financial condilion. Any budget amendmeuts made during the year arc adopted by City .
Council orciinance. -
11
/ T'hc City Manager is authorired to transfcr budgeted amounts within a fund; however,
any revisions that alter the total expenditures of a fund, or that a.ffect the number of
authorizeci employee positions, salary ranges or other eAnciitions of employment must be
approved by the City Council.
When the City Council deteimines that it is in tlie best interest of tbe City to increase or
decrease lhe appropriation for a particular fund, it may do so by ordi.nance approved by
one more than the rnajority a#fier holding one public hearing.
Significant Changes to the 2006 l3udget '
A review of the 2006 preliminary budget reveals the following signif-icant changes:
ltevenues ' .
1. Sales tax receipts have been increased $1;402,000 reflecting more accurate •
coding by retailers vf sales locations and growth in retail sales of 5+%.
2. Yroperiy taxes have heen decreased $1,800,000 because Library, operations
are no-vv part of the Spok.ane County Library Iaislrict which will levy property
taxes for this service. .
_ 3. Planning and Building fees have been reduced $263,000 anticipating a
slowing of new consiruction aad a more conservativic estimate of revenues.
~ LxpEnditures. .
1. Consfi-uction eosts for CenterPlace at Mirabeau Point, have lieen reduced by
$2,000,000 because this project has been eompleted.
2. Reserves have been set asidc for unaziticipated operating costs at Centerplacc,
extraordinary snow plaNving and deicing, se.rvice level stabilization during an
economic downturn and #'uYure civic facilities. 1t is unlikely these
• reserves will be used during 2006. However, this conservative approach has
increased the budget by $2,100,000. 3. Library expenditures of $2,270,000 have boen removed from the budget ,
because library operations fure now part of the Spokane County Libr.ary
District.
.4. Capital grant projects are expected to be $1 million greater than 2005 due to
the availability o.f state funding. 5. An economic study to investigate the feasibility to redevelop Sprague Avenue
ha.s inereascd the budget by $250,000.
. • -
12 . .
City of Spokane Valley ~
Selected Budget Policies .
Department directors have primary responsibiliry for fnrmulating budget
proposals in lin.e Nvith City Council and City Manager priarity direction, and for
implementing them once they are approveci.
1'he Finanee Departm.ent is respnnsible for c,oordi.nating the overa]] preparation
and admi.niatration of the City's buclget. This functinn is fiilfilled in complianee
with applicable State of Washington slatutes governing local govemment
budgeting practices. .
The Finance Department assists departinent staff in identifying budgct pmblems,
f'onnulating solutions and alteznatives, and implementing any necessary conective
actions. . '
Inter.fund c}iarges will be based on recovery of the di.rect casts associated with
providing those services. • Budget adjustments requiring City Council approval will occur through thc
ordinance process at the Fund level prior to fscal year end.
;
' The CiWs budget presentation will bc directed at disnlaying the Ciry's services
plan in a CounciVconstituent-friendly t'ormat
The City will pursue ending fund balanc;es for operatins funds at a level of na less
than eight pcrcent of revenue.
' Beginn.ing in 2010,'short term debt shall not exceed 10% of revcnues._ rTo loug
term debt will be incurred without idenl:ificatinn of a reveriue source to repay the
debt Long term debt will be incurreci for capital purpose.5 only.
The City will mai.ntai.n equiPment replacement f.unds that will receive annually
budgeted contributians from the operatin,g expenscs of departmenfs owning the ,
capital equipment in an amount necessary to replace the etluipment at the end of
. its usefiil life. Life cycle assurnptions and required contributions will be reviewed .
annually as part of the tiudget process.
13
BASIS OF ACCOUNTTNG A:N]) .BYJ.DG:ETING
Accounting
Accounting records for the City are maintained in accord"ance with methods prescrihed
by the State Auditor under the authority of Washington State law, Chapter 43.09.20
RCW, and in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles as set forth by
the Governmental Accounting Standards Boazd. -
Basis of Presentation - Fund Accountin~
Ttie accounts of the City of Spokane Va11Ey are organized on the basis of funds, each of
. which is considered a separate accounti.ng enlity.. Each fund is accoiuitcd for with a
separate set of doublc-entry accounts that comprise its asset.s, liabilities, fund equity,
revenues and expenditures or expenses, as appropriate. The City's resources are -
allocated tn and accounted for in individual funds depcnding on their intended purpose.
The following are the fund types used by the City oP Spokane Valley:
- Governmental Fund TvRes
Gavernmental funds are used to aceount far activities typically associated N%rith state
a,nd local g4vemment operations. All governmental fund types are accountcd for on a
spending or "financial flows" measurcment focus, which means tbat typically only currcnt assets and current lidbililies are included on related balance sheets. T-he
operating statements of governmental fixnds measure changes • in financial position, •
~ rather than net income. They present increases (revenues and other financing sources)
and decreases (exPenditures and other fmancing uses) in net current a..~seLs. There arc
, four governmental Puncl types used by the City of Spokane Val.ley:
GEncral k,und This £und is the primary fund of the City of Spokane Valley. It accbunts for all financial
resources except those required or clected to be accounted for i.n another fund.
Svecial R.evenue f unds
These funds account for revenues that are legally restricted or clesignated to finance
particular activities of the City o£ Spokane Valley. Speeial ltevenue funds include the
Street Fu.nd, Arterial Street Funci, Trails & Paths Fund, HoteUMotel Fund, Center:L'lace
Operating R.eserve Fund, Serviee Level Reserve Fund, Civic Facilities,l7.eserve Fund, and Winter Weather R.eserve Fund.
17ebt Service Funds
7'hese funds account for financial resources whieh are designated for thc rctircment of '
debt. Debt Servir,e funds are comprised of the Debt Servicc LTGO 03.
Capital Proiect Funds
These-funds account for financial resaurces, which are designated for the acquisition or
` f construction of genera] gavernment capital projects. Capital Project Funds include the
Capital 1'roject Fund, Special Capital Pr.ojecLs Fund, Streets Capital Projects Fund,
. 14 ~
Mirabeau Point Capital Froject Fund, CDBG F'und, Capital Grants Fund, l3arker Bridge
Federal Grant Fund, and Parks Capital Projects Fund.
Proprietary Fund Types 1'roprietary f'unds are used to account for activities similar to those found in the
private sector wher.e the i.ntent of the guverning body is to finance the full cost of
providing services, i.ncludi.ng depreciation, which based on the commercial mociel
uses a flnw of economic resources approach. Under this approach, the operating
statements for the proprietary funds focus on a measurenient of nel income
(revenues and expenses) and both cwrent and non-curre.nt assets and liabilities are
reported on related ba]ance sheets: Their reported fund equity (net total asset5) is
segregated into contribuled capital and retained earn.ings components. As describeci
below, there arc iwo gcneric fund types in this category:
Enterprise Funds
These funds aceount for operations that provide goads or services to tUe general public and are supported primarily by u.Ser chazges. The Stormwater Mana.gement
Fund is inclucled in this group of funds.
Internal Service Funds .
17hese funds account for operations tbat provide goods or servic;es to other deparhnents or funds of the City. T`be Equipment Rental and Replacement Fund and .
Risk Management rund aze included in this graup of Cwlds.
Basis of Accou,ntinQ _
Ba.Sis of accounting refers to when revenues and expenditures are recogmized in the
accounts and reported in the financial statements. The City of Spokaae.Valley uscs
a moclified acerual basis of accounting. Madified accrual reeognires revenues when
' they become both measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current
period.. Thc basis of accounting for enterprise and intemal scrvice funds is full .
accrual. 1"he appropriate basis is used throughout the budgeting, acc;ounting, and
reporting processes. F-ull accrual is a method of acwunting that matches revenues
and expenses with the period to which they relate, rather than. fncusi.ng an actual
cash flo-kvs. -
ln this method, for cxamplc, An asset is dcpreciated as it is "useci up", and the
expense.is recognized i.n pcriodic incre.ments, rather than assuming the asset holds
its value until it is actually disposed of. However, since the focus of budgeting is on '
the revenues and expenditure accounis, depreciation aad- amortization are nnt
considereci budgetary accounts, and are excluded from the buiigeti.ng system.
$udgets and Budgetary Accounting
Annual appropriated budgets are adopted foz all funds. These funds are budgeteci on
the modifieci cash basis of accounting. The financial statements inclucle budgetary
comparisons for those fiinds. . Budgets are adopted at the fund level that constihrtes the lega] authority for .
expenditures. Annual apprApriations for ail funds lapse at the fiscal peziod end. 15
EXPLANATION UF REVENUE SOURCES
GElYE12AL I~9UN'I) REVENl7ES:
Praperty Tax Revenue ' F'roperEy taxes play an essential role in the fiuaances o£ the municipal budgct. State law lim.its the
City to a$3.601evy per $1,000 assessed valuation, deducting .from lhere the lcvy of $1.50 by the
Sgokane County Fire llisficts #1 and #8, alang with deducting $0.50 for library levies, which
leavcs the City with the authority to levy $1.60 for its own purposes. `I'he levy amount must be
established by ordinancc by November 30th prior to the levy year. Loca1 Retail Sales and Use Tac
The local retail sales and use tax is cnmprised of lwa separate .5% options witti the Cou,nty
receiving 15% of each .5%. After deducting .01°/u a.s a Caunty administrative'fee, the City's
effective rate is.84%.
LoGaI Cri.m.inal Jusfic:e Sales Tac •
Y,ocal Sales Tax for Criminal Justice funding is to be useci 'solely for crimuial justice purposes, such as the City's law enforcement contract. This tax is authorized at 1/l 0 of 1% of retail sales
transac;te;d i.n the Caunty. Of the total amount collccted, the State distributes 10°/p lo the County,
~ with tli.e remai.nder being distributed by PoFulation to the cities and the unincorporated areas oC
the County. Beginni.n.g in 2005, an adciitienal .1% voter approved- increase in sales tax will be
devoted to criminal justice purposes. Gambluig '1'ax Revenues '
" Gambling tax rcveaucs must be sgent primarily on law en.f.orcemenl purposes pertaini.ng to
gambling. Funds remaining after necessary expenditures for such enf.orcement purposes may be
used for any general government purpose. .
Gambling taxes are to be paid quarterly to the City, no later than the last tiay of Januazy, April,
July and October. The City impose,s a tax on Qie following fnrms of gambling at the following
rates: Bingo (5% gross, less prizes); Rat'tles (5% gross, less prizes); Games (2% gross, less
prizes); Punc;h F3oards (5% net); Pull Tabs (5% net); Card nlaying (10% gross). ' Leasehold Excise Tax Taxes an pmperly owned by state or local govemments and leased to private parties (City's
share). Franchise Fees Cable TV is ihe only franchise fee levied in the City at a rate of 5% of goss revenues. This is a ' fee levied on private utili*.ies for the right to use city streets, alleys, and other public prnperties.
.
~ 16
State-Sharaci Revenue.s " .
State-shared revenues are received for liquor sales, and motor vehicle exeise taxes i.ncluding
travel trailer and c,amper excise tax. 'I'hess taxes are collected by the State af Washington and
shared with local govcmmeats based on population. State-shared re<<enues arc distributed on
either a monthly or quarterly basis, although not al.l quarterly revenues are distributed in the same month of tbe quarter.
The 2005 gopulation figure used in the 2006 Prel_iminary Budget is 85,010 as determined by the
Office of Financial Management for Washington State. This figure is important when
determi.ning distribution of State shared revenues on a per capita basis.
. Liquor Board 1'rafits and T.iquor Lxcise Tax
Gities roceive a share of botli liquor board profits and liquor excise tax receipts. The profits are
distributed on the last day of March, June, September, and December. 7`he excise portion is
distributed on the last day of January, April, July, and October. To be el.igible to receive these .
revenues, a city must devote at least tNvo percent of the distribution to support an approved
alcoholism or drug addi.ction program.
Service Revenucs
Fees are charged for services rendered by the City of Spvkane Valley. Most of the fees in the
General Fund are constructipn inspections and permits related to services such as planuuig,
zoning.and building. . . . Fines and Forfeitures . .
Fines and penalties are collecteci as a result of Niunicipal Court rulings aiid other miscella,neous
rule infractions. A11 court CYnes and penalties are shared witli the State and the City, on aver.age,
keegs less than 50"/0 of the amouni collected.
Recreation PmQram Nces
The Farks and RecreatiAn I7epartment charges fees f'or selected recreati4n pragrams. T`hese fees
pffset some of the costs related to providing the program. •
Investment Interest .
The City earns investment interest on sales ta1c, property tax, and fvnd investrnents.
OTHER FUN1) RE'VE NYTES:
STRCET FUN"ll: Motor Vehicle ruel F"xcise Tax (gas tax)
' . There are two seParate distributions to cities of revenues from this tax. Cities with a population
of 15,000 and ahove are required to account for the per capita share af the unrestricted gas tax as
a source to finanec slreet maintenance. Both distributions are no longer requircd to be accounted
for in separate funds but it is khe City's palicy to continue writh ttus praclycc. The City expscts to
receive $21.52 per capitR in motor vehi.cle fuel cxcisE tax iri 2006. Thcse dollars must be spent _
17
~ on slreet improvements. No increase in tax is projected bec.ause a ballot measure wtuch waulci
'repeal a tax increase will be on the November ballot
ARTERTAL ST~tEET FUND:
Molor Vehicle ruel Excise Tax (gas tax)
(See Street Fund - Motor Vehicle Fuel Fxcise 1 ax). , 1 K.f1ILS & FATH FCJND: . A small percentage of the City's gas tax must be set aside for trails and paths. This money wi.ll
likely accumulatc for several years until adequate ciollars are available for a project.
HOTEUMOTEL FIJNU: This fund receives all revcnue resulting f.rom the IIoteUMotel Tax levied upon eharges macie for
the fumishing of lodging by a hotel, rooming house, tourist cnurt, motel, trailer camp and other .
transient accommodations in Yhe City. lhe tax zale is 2 percent o:f the sclli.ng price or charge
made for the lodging. It is collected -and adrninistered by the Washington State Department of
Revenue. State law requires that these taxes be credited to a special fund with limitations on use,
principally to support touzism/conveation activities and related facilities, as prescribed by RCW _
~ 67.28.310.
DEB 1 SERVi.CE FUNI7 LTGQ 03:
Thc Public Facilities District wi.ll provide funding fdr the debt service on CenterPlac:e Bonds.
The City's C;apita.l Projects and Special Capital Yrojects Funds will provide funding for the debt
service on street bonds.
CAPIIA.L k'R.OJECTS FUND: Under Washinglon State I..aw, RCW 82.46.010, the City is allowed ta impose tin excise tax on
each sale of real progerty al the rate of one-quarter of one percent of the selling'price. The
revenue gencrated is be usecl for financing r,aPilal projects as specified in the capital facilities
. plan under-the GroNvth Management Act. . . SPECT.AL C~11'1'1'AL P.ROJEC'1"S NLTND: .
Under Washington State Law, RCW 82.46.010; the City -is allowed to impose an adclitional -
excise tax. an each sale of real property at the rate of one-quarter of one percent of the selling
price. The revenue generated is to be used for fuiancing public works capital projects as
specified in the capital facilities plan_ under the Growth Management Act i-~
~ ; .
18
INTFRFCJND TI2A.. SFERS:
Many funds rcceive their revenues from other funds in the form of an interfund transfer. These
trausfers may represent payments for' service, an operating transfer, or a concentration of
revenues for a specific project '1"he followi.ng fwids receive lransrers from other funds.
General Fund is budgeted to receive transfers from the Street Fund, Slormwater
Management Fund, and the fIotel/hflotel Fund af $25,000, $15,000 and $40,000,
respectively.
Street Fund is budgcted ta ncceive atransfer from the General Fund of $2,000,000. •
Trails & Paths Fund is budgeted to receive a transfer from the Street Fund in the amount
o.f $5,053. Street Capital Project$ Fund is bucigeted to receive traasfers frnm and Street $ond Fund
of $902,460, Arterial Street Fund of $332,270, Stormwater Management Fund of
$150,000, and Special Capital Projects Fund oi' $977,713. Jaebt Service Fund is budgeteci to rec;eived tTansfers from bothof the Capital 1'rojects
Fund and the Speck-l Capital Projects Fund of $93,000.
. Capital Grants F-und is budgcted to receive a iransfer from the Special Capital Projects
Fuads and A.rlerial Street Fund of $1,117,000 and $236,385, respectively.
Equipment Rental &*Replacement is budgeted to receive transfers &em tlie General fund
for interfund cha,rges in the total amount of $210,465. R.isk Management Fund is budgeted to receivc $166,200 from the General Fund for employment Security payments and City insurance premiums.
STOR.M'WATER M.AIVAGFM:;NT FEE: This fee is imposed upon every developed parcel of property within the City and is an annual
charge of $20.00 for each single family unit and $20.00 per 3,160 square feet of iinpervious
surface for all other properties. These charges are uniForm for the same class of customers or
service facilities. These fees are estimated to be $1,524,900 for 2006.
i
19
2006 PRELIIMNARY BUDGET
i
. Major Revenue Assumptions .
l. The 2005 pnpulation figure utSed in the 2006 Preliminary Budget i:s 85,010 as
determined by the Officc of Financial Management f.or the State of Washington.
This figure is impo.rtant when determining distribution of State shared revenues on
a per capita basis.
2. The 2006 estimated assessed valuation (AV) is $5,021,000,000. . The City's actual
assessed value will be assigned by the Spokane County Assessor.
3. Progerty taxes are levied based on assessed value and thc City expects to collect
• 95% of those taxes levied in 2006 realiring the remaining 50/o rriay be collected in
the following years-
4. Estimates for sales tax receipts were baseci on the City's actual collections in 2005.
5. Gambling taxes were estimateci from amounts collected by the City in 2005.
6. Franchisc fees were based upnn the Projected fees collected in the 2005 budget
year.
7. Liquor excise taxes and liquor profits are baseci upon eslimates from the Mu.nicipal
. Research and Services Ccnter (MRSC). 8. Fines &Forfeits were based upon projected collections by the City in 2005.
9. l3uilding permil and land usc fces were esti_mated by the City of Spokanc Valley are
, based upon 2005 records and an anticipated downturn in the construclion cycle.
' 10. Real estate excise taxes were based upon projected col.lections by the City in 2005.
11. Gas tax revenues are based upon estimates by the City of Spokane Valley.
12. The Stormwater Management fee is based upan an Equivalcnt Kesideudal Unit
(ETZU) rale of $20. .
20
2006 PREL:nvIlvAtx BunGEx Major Expenditure Assumptions
1. Servi.ce levels are the same or grcater than provided in 2005.
2. Positions and salary ranges are based upon the Citiy's cnmpensation and
classification plan. ' •
3. Benefit amnunts were based upon the pmposed employee benefits plan. 4. . The contract costs foz public safety, park maintenance and strcef mai.ntenance are
based upon estimates by City staff. 21
\
City of Spokane Valley .
2006 Budget Summary
Estlmated Beg. Est Ending . Fund Fund Balance Revenues Exaertditures Fund Balance
001 General Fund $ 4,784,250 $ 29,803,066 $ 29,885,641 $ 4,701,675
101 Street Fund • 3,100,000 3,813,000 4,131,256 2,761,744
102 Arterial Street Fund 568,655 - 568,655 -
103 Trails & Paths Fund 18,000 5,053 23,053 23,053
105 HoteUA7otel Fund 49,667 351,000 400,667
120 Centeff'lace Operating Reserve 300,000 - 300,000 , 300,000
121 Servioe Level Sbbilization 1,000,000 - 1,060,000 . 1,000,000
.
122 Winter Weather Reserve 500,000 - 500,000. W0,000
204 Debt Service LTGO 03 = 600,000 600,000 -
3~01 Capital Projects Fund ' u 190,00~0 1,020,000 '1,210,000 '!a l5~00,000
302 Special Capital Projeds . 50,713 1,020,0130 1,070,713 500,000
- 303 Street Capital Projects - 8,385,843 8,385,843 • -
304 Mirabeau Point Capital Projeds 783,205 - 783,205 ' -
305 Street Bond Capital Projects 502,460 - 902•460 "
306 CD Biock Grant Fund - - -
307 Capital Gran4s Fund - 8,211.000 8,211,0130 -
308 Barker Bric3ge Federal Fund - 558,000 ' 558,000 ~ -
309 Parks Capital Projects Fund 550,000 750.000 •1,300,000 1,300,000
310 Civic Building Capital Projects Fund 500,000 600,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 -
402 Stomrwater Management . 485,413 1,539,900 1,621,534 403,779
501 Equipment R& R 482,792 210,465 693,257 500,000
502 Risk Management _ 23,739 166,200 189.938 -
$ 14,288,894 $ 57,033,527* $ - 63,435,223 $ 13,610,251
Gash Utilized irom Fund Bafance 6,401,696 -
$ 63,435,223 - $ 63,435,223 - .
~1 22
- City of Spokane Valiey -
2006 Budget ~-%Revenues by Type -
General Fund Property Tax $ 8,281,000
Sales Tax 15,400,000
Gambling Tax 810,000 .
. Franchise Fees/Business Registrations 681,750
State Shared Revenues 1,121,000
Service Revenues 1,600,000 .
Fines and Forfeitures 1,350,000
Recreation Program Fees ' 345,516
Miscellaneous & Investment Interest - 133,800
Transfers 80,000
. Total General Fund 29,803,066
Otfier Funds Street Fund 3,813,000 , -
Arterial Street Fund
Trails &'Paths Fund 5,053 .
HoteUMotel Fund 351,000 Debt-Service LTGO 03 600,000 Capital. Projects Fund 1,020,000,
. . SpeGial Capital Projects Fund 1,020,000. ,
. Street Capitial Projects Fund . 8,385,843.. Capital Grants Fund 8,211,000 Barker. Bridge - Federal Grant Fund 558,000
Parks Capital Fund 750,000
. Civic Building Capital Fund . 600,000
Stormwater Management Fund 1,539,900 . Equipment Rental!& Replacement 210,465
Risk Management Fund 166,200
Total Other Funds 27,230,461
Total All Funds $ 57,033,527
, . .
,
23
City ot Spokane Valley
2006 Generrl Fund Revenue Sources
$29.803,066
Recreatlon Program
Fines and Forfeitures Fees Other Revenue
4.596 ~ 1.196 0.4% Transfers
Setvrice Revenues 0_3%
5.49b
State Shared Revenues
3.896 Property Tax
27 894:
Franchise Fees
2.396
Gambling Tax
2.796 - -
.
1
Sales Tax
51 7°r6
24
City of Spokane Valtey
2006 Estimated City Resources
$57,033,527
Ottter Misc
Funds
Sbreet Fund 0.6% Debt Service
8.796 Fund
1 1 ur6
~
~ Capital Project
Funds
~ j 36.0°!0
,
General Fund ?
52.3%
Stormwater
Management
- - FuRd
2.7°k
Intemal
Service
Funds
0.6%
25
CNy d Spokarn Valey
2006 BudqN
DNd Rewnues by Type
2064 2006 Mnatlded 200G
Genwal Fund Rovwiuw _ Ackm1s Budo~1 ~dD~t
Pn3perw.7~t
Pop„q, Tax : a9eo.837 a 9.870.000 s 5,o5a,ooo
prop" Tax _ pokxpAwd 1E5,316 225.000
8.9BQ.837 10.055.316 0.281,000
sakiIAm
3ales Tax 19,551.813 12.2D0.000 13.8E0.000
Smiss Tyx - CnminM k 1.119.661 1.114000 820.000
Saies Tax - Pubtic b`WNery - 600.000 BOO.OOQ
14,681,175 13.99E.000 16.100.000
C4Krtft Tom
Ptnch 8oords 8 Pull Tsha 119.703 130,0DO 12D.000
grW & RoOss 30.606 I4,000 10.000
Card Games 899.566 628~000 680,000
seo.163 eoa,000 e10.000
1,419 5,000 2,500
F~FM 878.481 650,000 681,750
MVET ~Mnal iusgm . PopWrion 14,961 18,189 11,100
Crnminal JusSoe Area 01 36.804 14,000 14,000
C+irrrrtal .lupstioe Amo 02 98,605 20.000 20.000
CikmYnal Jusdoe /lraa A 38.804 20,000 20,Q00
CnminW ,luspoe /Ues f+t 38.603 97,000 18,000
pU . Cibm 13,914 12,OOQ 12.000
LiQuar Boerd EA.iB Tax 321.151 327,405 113,066
Lyq" goard pmy 594,407 612, 'OJ6 bt2,635
Wuk Study fieimburterrienl 24fi3 - -
1,104.311 1.121.709 1,121.000
~ e61.191 1,200,000 W7,000
pkxftup pOM*b 8a.103 53.000 53.000
Gmdng pamiy 726 7,D00 7.000
hedmicai PenNts 9D.800 50.000 30.000
Oemotlion Peirnib 2.108 1.000 1,000
Msa Pemft i Faes 306.912 175.000 205,000
f'kns Cf+eclc Faes 73,279 197.000 197.000
F4wvft Fap 310,355 1e0.000 18O.D00
T,7g5,504 1,863,000 1,600.D0()
Eps_wodE~m
Fa,m a F«+aft - Trnft 53e,540 600.000 675.ooo
Oeher Cirnind Nan-Trdfic Fines 727.415 _ 600.000 _ 675.000
1,28t,855 1.200,000 1,35U,00(]
/1dhrtY F~CTo tes 4fOQeWonil fYdNM 28,777 30.000 224,90o
progmn Fma (7o pw*jqab 1n a propiam) 123,307 BO0U00 120,8_1B
152,034 90,000 345.516
krAwUneni k+OeiNt 45,112 12,000 101.300
5ales Tax kgetsl 15,022 12.000 15.000
Fhapatty Tax kdsteN 8,815 12000 15,000
69,349 38.000 195,900
Tran
Tmslar hom Slreat Fund 34,300 162,676 23.000
Tramuter Uom Storrnwatar . 51.482 15.000
Twafar hom Cepkal Ptojocb - 40.000 -
Transfar Uom NobellMotei - CaderPlrce - 40.OOU 10.000
34,300 267.140 80.000
6ii
Totd f3enersl Furid Revnnua f 29,653,527 _ t 30,108.165 S 29,803,0
y
c►ey of spok.re vafty
zooe eudget
Dotati Ruvanues by Typa
2004 2005 Amonded 2006
Othot Fund RovonuM Actual Bud_ ~ gudig!
1Q1 S1reatFy[M! _
Pmpwty Taxes 203203
MoWr Fuel (Gas) Tax 1.144.237 1.203,004 1.79.000
Opera[inp Trwnster - Loan Repay*WM 1,259.105 -
InveslrrlEn! FnlBrest . 80.000
Irrttt/txid Transler - 2.025.000 2.000.000
Inlerfuid loan In6erest _ 58"4 75,000 "
1.404.134 4.562.109 3.613,000
102 Arlcrfel S`Ifeel Fund
Molor Fud (Gas) Trz 538.978 582.485 -
Irnesanert Irterest 7236 4.000 -
548219 568.485 -
103_Tr~ i PdtLS Fufd
Tronsfer trom S&eat Fund 8.492 5.100 5.057
Lo_. ~~1ffi
NotellMatel T ex 383.444 350,000 350.000
InvCStrnent utlnttst _ 1,W7 1,ODO 1.000
365,061 351,000 351.000
120 r~taoe 4~~~~ -L~s~
fnterfund Transler - 300.000 '
121 Servic~ i.~i
Irberhai0 ?rarsfer - 1'000'000
172 YYmtet WaI~
frrEerfwd Trarmtfer - 50.000 '
0~Oe4t Servlce • LTGO
Feditles Disttfd ReVenue 395.643 307.746 114,000
Debt Savlce Transfer from Capltml Pn4eW - - -
Tranafet from Spcdal CepYal PMIsdS
ar,d speda► r.OPRW Prolecs 165,255 las.ogo 186,000
680,928 5d2.835 600.000
30 S Gaailw PtD~.Fund
REET 1- tsl 25 PCfOBrd 1.037,920 800.000 1.000,000
Irtvesttnerg k►beras! 14.65E 6.000 20.000
1.052.678 806.000 i.D20,000
Na Soedal CaoR~b Fund
RE£T 2- 2nd 25 Percent 972.120 800.000 1,000,OOD
Irnestmenllrrterest 11.593 8.~ ~,DDO
983,719 908.000 1,020.0D0
(RV'!slfl1R(t k*NW 352
Davetopet CanMbullons 3.021 2.987,000 -
GraM Prooeeds • - 8,023,400
Crana(at kom Sireet 8ond Fund 1.078.999 - 9Q2.480
Transliar hnm Ganernl Fund - 342,300 -
Ttar►O1x kom Sewer Fund 237.344 - -
1'taneiet trom ArberiW Sttael Fund - 870.100 332.770
Trnnstor hom StomlwalBr Managemetd Ftxid - 150.000 160.Q00
Trdflsief 1rDfst SpCClal CBpltp► PtpfeC[5 290,000 112.BQ0 __977.713
1,517,637 4.282.390 E1.385.943
CMy of Spokarn valfuy
2006 BudQrt
OoRall PAre►uos tiY TYPQ
2004 2DOS Atnwbod 2006
00w Fund Rw"nws _ Aclu°l BudoM _ BudIIat _
~
lnkorM 75.829 - Oonatlons 2,880.670 -
kwranae Remveries 1.068
2.957,585 - 305 Sfead Bond
hnesfrtlent Irqerest 37.TM '
3m CD BiodC Caranl FtY1d
C08G Grart Proceeds 287.803 • -
Imresknerd Inlerest 134.941 -
- '
402.744
307 CaoiFal Grerns Fu~d
CapnW Cn" Proaaaft 4.418.000 6.567.815
Trstvdm ham Arfex1a19Eteet Fund - 186,000 238.385
Trarsfen from Capitsl PrMecb Fund 97,05U 400.000 1.117.000
175.064 5,010.000 0,211.000
3ru a e. rd+,+.. c3....r.+.+.+n.mon - Fad Grtrt
Federd Grsnl Pmcneds - 15U,000 538.W0
kweriad Trttx(srs - 558,000 750.000
I ?MkOA T~8 . 5pp,ppp fi00,000
.tQI-Smw-Ftnd
Investrfient IntereLt 334 _
4QZ MMTWAliK IrAriaoMMOLFud
Slnmwvaler Mmagameni Fee T78.858 1.T70.T80 1,524.900
Irwestrnwt krterest 12.391 5.000 16.U00
789.254 1.276.750 1.530.900
937 1.500
knesbTwd k*ore*
ge,2pp 81.750 122,064
wo~nn c~es
F'o 6.ceo 3.aoo a.eoo
d Cor Charges 33.561
Vetddn Puam3w~a Tnrstets 15.000 33,551 19.374 28~TQ4 ~~.550
Vel~icls ~tmt Gta~pes
124.071 145.305 210,485
Emplorwd SoCUdty Tnualow A.BW 4,450 8.200
Rkk Itonogement Servkms 130.000 130.OU0 180.000
134.8W 134.45Q 100,200
ToW M Otlwr Funds 11.088.347 21.708r314 27~2J0,461
7otai Roywam 1 40.T31.D75 S 51.814.478 _ i 57,033.527 _
;A
City of Spokane Valley
2008 Budget
Expenditures by Department
C~gneral F
Legisiative Branch $304,267
Legislative b Execxidve Servlces 470,105
Public Safety 16.873,541
Operations b Administrative
Deputy City AAanager 499,405
Finarice 518,695
Legal 263.750
Human Resoutces 161,120
Pubifc Works 980.192
Pianning b Community Qev.
Pianning ~ ~~~,808
BuildinA 1.040.892
Parks & Reueatlon
Adminksiratlon 8 Maintenence 847.703
Recreatlon 199,475
qquatics 299.921
Senlor Center 89,269
CenEerPiaoe 438,288
General Govemment 5,825,000
Total Genetal Fund 28,885.641
Qther Ftmds
Street Furid 4,131,236
Arterial Street Fund 568,655
Trails and Paths Fund 23,053
HoteUMotel Fund 400,867
CeMerptaco Operating Reserve Fund 300.000
Service Level Stablizertion Fund 1.000,000
VYnter Weather Reserve Fwnd 500.000
pebt Service - LTGO 03 600,000
Capital Projeds Fund 1,210,000
Special Capital Projects Fund 1,070,713
Strest Capdtlal Projects Fund 8,385,643
Mirabesu Pdnt Capital Projects Fund 783,205
Street Bond Capital Projects Fund 902.180
Capital Grarrta Fund 8,211,400
Baricer Bridge - Federal Grartt Fund 558,000
Partcs Capital Projects Fund 1,300,000
Civic Buildlngs Capitef Projects Fund 1,100,000
Stormwater Manegement Fund 1,621,534
EquipmeM Rentat 8 Replacement 683.257
Risk Management Fund 189,939
Total All Funds 5 63,435,223
za
City of Spokane Vallsy
2008 Budget
Genaral Fund Expendttures by Department by Type
Wasm 8
nBe efts SuWllN Services In ov. tnteAund Canilal Exn Total
GQneral Fun4
Legislative Branch : 148,952 $ 18.300 $ 122,088 S - i 12.947 S - $ 304,287
Lepfalaiive 8 ExeaAive 403.020 7,748 50,090 • 9,247 • 470,105
PuWlc Safety . . - 18,873.541 - - 19,873,541
OperaEbns & AdmiMstrative
Deputy City Manayer 414,408 5.700 87,700 - 11,597 - 496,405
Ftrmance 465,795 12,700 23.100 - 15,300 - 518,885
Lsgat 212,750 5,500 39,800 - 5,900 - 263,750
Hwnan Resoutnes 100.820 3.500 53,300 - 3,700 - 181.120
Pubpc Waka 808.848 42,687 59,415 10,000 38,744 22,500 980,192
PlertNng & Coznmunlty Dev.
Planning 589.278 18.200 486,034 - 14,798 7,500 1,085,808
Building 848,929 38,575 70,635 31.240 40,884 10,648 1,U40,892
Pertca 8 Reaeatbn
Parks Administtatfon 182238 48.340 834,127 - 3,000 - 847,703
Recxealion 138,575 4,078 48,882 - 7,840 - 199.475
Aquatlcs - - 299,921 - - - 299,921
Seniof Center 49,969 4,800 12.570 - 1,900 - 89,289
Centerfllaoe 188,283 12,830 239.205 - - - 438,288
General GovemmaM - 8,000 2.824,000 165,000 2.915.000 125.000 5.825,0()0
Tate! General Fund $ 4,530.871 $ 229,958 $ 4,810,647 $ 17,089,781 ~ 3,078,935 $ 185.649 $ 29,885,841
ao
City of Spokane Valley
2006 General Fund Expenditures by Dept
$29,885,641
Legisafive Branch
1.0% Lep►slatrve & Executive
Services
1 G°IU
General Govemment
19.596
I
r
Parlcs 8 Recreatton
6 2%
Planning & Communi.y
Oevelopment
7.196
~
Public Safety
56 54b
Public Wo►ics =
3.3%
Operations & Administrative
Servlces
4 8%
31
City of Spokane Valiey
2006 General Fund Expenditures by Type
$29,885,641
Intetiund Payments
10.2%
Capital Outlay
- 0.696
N
Intergovemmentai Ws9es 26enefits
~
Paymenffi -
57.196
~
- - Suppiies
0.8%
Services
16 1%
32
Fund: 001 General Fund spokan. vaUey
D.pk ott Legislativs Branch 2006 Bud
011 - LeQislative Branch
This departrnent accoamts for the cost of providing etfective elected representation
of the cffienry in the goveming body. The Council makes poticy decisbns br the
City and is acxountable ta Spokane Valiey ci6zens by making deasions regarding
how resources are a[bcated, the appropriate leveks of servbe, end estebtEshing
goals and policles for the organization.
AccotnalishmQnts for ~00~5
• Adoot Spoksne Yslfev's Flrst ComoreheRSive Plan The City CouncB will
shonly begin it's public hearing process on ffie oomprehensh►e plan aRer the
Planning Cammission hes spent countless hours in crafling a preliminary plan for
the City.
• Enact a Unfform Devebpment Code Compietion of thts task wiii foltow the
adoption at the Comprehensive Plan. The pro}ed has been fuity ouflined and tiUes
reserved in the munidpal code awaiting eReciment of the appro(xiat,e provisions.
•{dentlfv the Efemertts of a Six-Yeu Stratestic Flnancial Plan The Coundi has
spent numerous meeangs wvricing on the elements at financial planning in ader bo
devebp comprehensive forecast for the Ctty.
•/ldvance the interests of Sooune Vallev tfirouQh Effective Extemal Reletlons
The City Coundl recendy hired a Pubiic Information Officer b assisi in the
devebpment of a community relations process and esiablish methods to improve
communications with out citizens_
• Coilaborate with Wastewatar Dischamers and Reaulaborv Aaencles The
Council along with appropriabe staff has taken an active rde in participating in the
TMDI worlc group, cvmprised of wastewater discharcges and rEgulatory agendes, to
write a pian setting water quality standards in order tn meet the requirements of the
State and secure a rrastewaUer permiC from the DepartrnEnl of Ecology.
• Febblbh a tormal Citv-wide customer senrice arosiram The Council conbnues
to work on a customer service approve to dealing witfi issued In order to provide
tirnely responses to concems of tfie citlzens and persons dealing with our
Oepertments.
33
Fund: 001 Generel Fund Spokane Valloy
Qept: 011 Legislative Branch 2006 Budget
. 011 - Leqislative Branch
Goals for 2006
• Draft a well-defined Street Master Plan, with Funding Options, that identifies ,
• the current condition of city streets and recommends appropriate improvements and
maintenance that preserve the value and structural integrity of the local transportation
system.
• lnitiate the First Phase of the Saraque Corridor Revitalization Plan
between University and the freeway by contracting with a consultant to design a _
strategy that would strengthen the eoonomic viabiliry of the corridor.
. Continue MonitorinQ Siqnificant Wastewater Issues including govemance of
wastewater facilities, enhanced citizen awareness of opbons for the future and
pursuit of the most efficient and economical use of allowed wastewater dischzrges.
• Maintain a Sfronq Emphasis on Intemal and External Communication
utilizing the Pubfc Inforrnation Officer position to enhance the quality, timeliness and .
avcuracy of intemal diafogue and fhe information provided by citizens about city
issues, initiatives and work plans. • Explore the Availa6le Telecommunications Infrastructure and that may be
f~ ~ araessed by public institutions, residents and businesses within Spokane Valley.
;
, , .
~
" Budq@t SummaN
2005
2004 Amended 2006
Actual Budget Budget
Personnel - FTE Equivalents Mayor 1:0 1.0 1.0
Council • 6_0 6_0 6_0
Total FTEs 7.0 7.0 7.0 '
Bud4et Detail '
Salaries, Wages, 8 Beneflts $ 85,521 $ 152,675 $ 149,952
Suppties 10,690 15,460 19,300
Serv9ces & Charges 87,169 109,291 122,068
. Interfund Charges 11,760 10,800 12,947 Total Legislative Branch $ 195,140 $ 288,226 $ 304,267
.
. 34
Fund: 001 General Fund Spokane Vaney ,
Dcpt: 013 Executive 8 Legislative Support 2006 Budget
013 - Executive & Leqislative Support •
This department is accountable to the C'rty Council for the operational results of the
organization, effective support of efected officials in achieving their goals; fulfillment
of the statutory requirements of the City Manager, implementation of City Council
policies, and provides communication linkage belween citizens, the City Council,
City departments, and other govemment agencies.
- Accomplishments for 2005
• Adopt Spokane ValleY's First Comprehensive Plan The City.Council will shortly begin iYs public hearing process on the comprehensive plan after the Planning Commission has spent counNess hours in crafting a preliminary plan for
the Gity.
' • Enact a Uniform Develoament Code Completion of this task will follow the
adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. The project has been fully outlined and titles
reserved in the municipal code awaifing enactment of the appropriate provisions.
• Identifv the Elements of a Six-Year Strateqic Financial Plan The Council has
spent numerous meetings working on the elements of financial plahning in order to
develop comprehensive forecast for the City. "
• Advance the Interests of Spokane Vallev throuAh Effective Extemal Relations The City Council rccently hired a Public Information Officer to assist in the
development of a community relations process and establish methods to improve oommunications with out citizens. • Cotlaborate with Wastewater Dischargers and ReQUlatorv Aaencies The ,
Council along with appropriate staff has taken an active role in participating in the
TMIDL worlc group, comprised of wastewater discharges and regulatory agencies, to
write.a plan setting water quality standards in order to meet the requirements, of the
. State and secure a wastewater permit from the Department of Eoology.
• Establlsh a formal Citv-wide.customer service pro4ram The CounCil continues
to work on a customer service approve fo dealing with issued in order to provide
timery responses to concems of the citizens and persons dealing with' our
Departments. ,
35
i
Fund: 001 General Fund Spokarso Vaney
Dept: 013 Executive 8 LegPslative Support 2006 Budget
013 - Executive & Leqislative Suvport
Goals for 2006
• Draft a well-defined Street Master Plan, with Funding Options, that identifies
the current condition of city streets and recommends a.ppropriate improvements and
maintenanoe that preserve the value and structural integrity of the local transportation
system. . • Initiate the First Phase of the Snraaue Gorridor Revitalization.Plan between University and the freeway b}i contracting with a oonsuftant to design a .
strategy that would strengthen the eoonomic viability of the corridor.
. Continue Monitorinq Siqnificant Wastewater Issues including governance of
wastewater facilities, enhanced citizen awareness of options for the future and
_ pursuit of the most efficient and. economical use of allowed wastewater discharges.
Maintatn a Stronq Emohasis on Internal and External Communication
utilizing the Public Information Officer position to enhance the quality, tirneliness and
accuracy of intemal dialogue and the information provided by citizens about city
issues, initiatives and worfc plans. - • Explore the Available Telecommunications Infrastructure and that may be
accessed by public institutions, residents and businesses within Spokane Valiey.
• . Budqet Summarv
' 2005 2004 Amended ' 2006
- Actual Budget Budget -
Personnel - FTE Equivalents City Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0
City Clerk 1.0 1.0 1.0
Deputy City Clertc 0.5 . 0.5 0.5
_ Administrative Assistant (CC) 1.0 - 1.0 1.0
AdminisUative Assistant (CM) 1.0 1_0 1`0
Total FTEs , 4.5 4.5 4.5
Budqet Detail Salaries, Wages, & Benefits $ 319,271 $ 391,989 $ 403,020
' Supplies 6,439 6,998 7,748
' Services & Charges 32,032 38,650 50,090
InterFund Charges 5,880 5,250 9,247
Total Executive & Legislative Support $ 363,622 $ 442,867 $ 470,105
~ . .
36
Fund: 001 General Fund City of Spokane Valley \
Dept: 016 Public Safety 2006 Budget , i016 - Public Safetv '
The Public Safety department budget provides funds for the
protection of persons and property in the city. Tlie City contracts
with-Spokane County for law enforcement, district court,
prosecutor services, public defender services, probation services, jail and animal control services. See following page for
detail information on each budgeted section.
Law Enforcement - The Spokane County Sheriff's office is
responsible for maintaining law and order and providing police
- services to the community under the direction of.the Police Chief.
The office provides for the preservation of life, protection of
property, and reduction of crime.
• Budgeted contract amount: $ 13,460,009 :
Judicial System - The Spokane County District Court is contracted
' to provide municipal court services. The contract provides for
the services of judge and court commissioner with related support
staff. Budgeted amount also includes jury management fees.
Budgeted contract amount: $ 1,693,425
Jail System - Spokane County provides jail and probation
services for persons sentenced by any City of Spokane Valley
Municipal Couit Judge for violating laws of the city or state. •
Budgeted contract amount: $ 564,000
Animal Control - Spokane County will provide animal control services to include licensing, care and treatment of lost
or stray animals, and response to potentially dangerous animal
confrontations.
Budgeted contract amount: $ 433,484 .
. i"
37
City of Spokane Valley -
2006 Budget . •
016 - Public Safety
2005
2004 Amended 2006
Actual Budget Budget
Judicial System:
Dislrict Court Contract 655,756 691,328 ' 839,817
Jury Management Contract . 7,956 5,000 5,000
Pubtic Defender Contract 215,519 310,028 342,705
ProsecutorCorrtrad 221,698 294,159 357,520
Crime Vctim Compensation ' - 8,485
Pretrial Servioes Contract . 25,18932,908 48,383
Probation Service.s Contract 30,482 60.000 -
Subtotal Judicial System 1,156,599 1,401,908 1,593,425
Law Enforcement System: 5heriff ConVad 11,749,666 12,892,303 ' 13,319,812
Emergency Management Contract . 56,093 64,700 72,397
Law Enf. Bldg Maintenance Cont.ract 56,682 38,573 40,000
Vehicle Decals, 5,197 10,000 10,013P
Clothing & Unfforms ~ - 7;000 7,000
Vehicle Usage Costs • 222 • 500 5,300
Equipment Replacement Charge 5,500 . 5,5g0 5,500
Subtotal Law Enforcement System: 11,873,3s2 ~ 13,018,576 13,460,009
~ • ,
Jail System: . '
Jail Contract 363,921 171,039 444,000
Work Release (Geiger) 30,393 118,759 120.000
Subtotal Jail System: 394,314 289,798 564,000
Other: .
CapitalOudayslCommunications - 198,000 132,623
Fines & Forfeitures State Remittance 659,805 591,515 590,000
Animal Control Contract 399,555 449,627 433,484
Contingency Reserve - - 100,000
1,059,360 , 1,199,142 1,256,107
ToffiI Pubiic Safety $ 14,483,635 $ 15,9091424 $ 16,873,541
,
' The increase of the 5heriff Contract is the City's portion related to the serilement of the County Sheriffs labor
negotiatians. In addition, a voter approved sales tax lincrease of .1% in 2004 of sales tax is designated to fund
r.rirninal justioe and public safety related costs.
.
i
• 38
. City of Spokane Valley I
2006 Budgeted Contract Expenditures
14,000,000 13,319,812
12,000,000 -
10,000,000
8,000,000 -
6,000,000 - - - - - ~ _ _ - - -
4,000,000
2,000,000
839,817 444,000
342,705 357,520 120,000
72,397
r--~ F~ r
District Court Public Defender Prosecutor Sheriff Contract Emergency Jail Contract Woric Release
Contract Contract Contract Management (Geiger)
Contract
39
Fund: 001 Genoral Fund Spokartc Valloy
oepr oie Opcrations & Administrativa Serveces 2006 Budget
016 - Operations & AdministratrYe Servicos
The Operations 8 Administrative Services Department is compased of four
' divPsions, the 17eputy City Manager Divisian, the Fnance Division, the Legal
Division, and the Muman Resources Division.
013 - Dsputv CiN Manaqcr Division '
The Deputy Cily Manager (DCM) supervises the Operations 8 Adminis6ative '
.
Services DepaAmeni, assists the City Manager in arganizing and directing the
ather operetions of the city and assumes the duties of the Cily Manager
in hisfier absence. ' Auomolishments for 2005 • Estableshed a formal, atywide custorner servroe propram. .
• Developed model agreements far use in service wntrscts vrith Spokane County
' in arder to provide consistency and enhance accountabifity.
. Revised the law enforcement agreement in order to simplify the oost metfiodology
and incm.ASe responsiveavess throtn.qh enhanced Flew'6ility. -
• Completed a casE-benefit analysis in repard to Gbcary annexation and presented an
annexation measure to the af¢ens that proposed annexation to the Spokane County
Library District. • DeveJoped arrod implemented Cnmmercial Building Permit procedure to ensure
timeiy monitoring, response and intervention in the permii process. ,
. . Created arud implemented inierdepartmental tracking systems to monitw the •
allocation o( time and resources. . •
• Reveewcd and revis,ed the City of Spolcane Va1ley afficial website. '
• Cteated and irr►plementett Gity of Spokane Vaney GommLmicatioris PoJicies and
Procedures, indudinq crisis communication program.
GoaEs for 2006
• • Review and revise dty's pracesses ro ensure reliability, consistency anrl
efiicbency. '
. Starudarclixe afl city pubfiqdons aruJ prfrited materials to conform to hiqhest •
standards of profes,sianalism and effectiveness. • tmplement initial elemcnts of.community comrnunPcations prayram, including
esteblishing a Speakers 8ureau R schedul'rrtg negular engagements on critical lopics. • ,
SudACt Summarv
2005 - 2004 Amended 2006
Actual Budget Budget
PPr-onnel - FTE EQUivalenfs
Deputy City Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 . ' . Admfnislralive Analyst 1.0 1.0 1.0
Public infprmatron Officer 0.0 0.0 , 1.0
O(tice Assistant II 1.0 1.0 1.0 .
Admirtistrative Assistant 0_5 Q,5 2_0
' Yo~l FTEs 3.5 3:5 6.0
$udsrst Deta7
Sa[artes, Wages. & 8enefi#s $ 221,299 $ 331,042 . $ 414,408 . .
• Supplies 4,100 6,200 5,700
Services & Charqes 3,554 7,700 67,70D ~
~ Interfiuui Charges 5,884 5,750 11.597
7otsl Depvty City D.landger Division ~633 S 350.692 S 499,405
40
/
Fund: 001 General Fund Spokane Valiey
~
Dept: 016 . Operations &Administrative Seivices 2006 Budget
014 - Finance Division
TheFinance Division provides financial management services for all city
departments. Programs include accounting and reporbing, payroll, accounts payable,
purchasing, budgeting and financial plannirig, treasury, information technologjr
and investments. The department is also responsibfe for generating and analyzing
data related to the Cit)(s operations. The department prepares monthly, quarterly,
. and annual financial reports and budgets to ensure compliance with state laws.
Accomolishments for 2005 .
• Expanded multi-year financial plan to a six year window to coRespond with other
City pfans.
• Developed an A-87 Cost Allocation.
Goals for 2006
• Continue to refine the multi-year financial plan process by comparing revenue
estimates with other area agencies.
• Identify availabfe telecomr-ounications infrastructure that is/could be available in the
. area for use by citizens and businesses. Discuss same with economic development
agencies to determine benefrts. ~
. • Integrate information from A-87 cost allocation plan into the City budget.
Budqet Summary
. 2005
2004 Amended 2006
Actual Budget Budget ,
Personnel - FTE Eauivalents
Finance & Admin Services Director 1.0 1.0 1.0
Accounting Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 Aec4untanUBudget Analyst 1.0 2.0 2.0
Accounting Technician 1.0 1.0 1.0
IT Specialist ' 1_0 1_0 1.0
• Total FTEs 5.0 6.0 6.0
Budget Detail
Salaries, Wages, & Benefits $337,105 $481,869 $ 465,795
Supplies 5,128 7,700 12,700
Services & Charges 12,271 12,400 23,100
Interfun'd Charges 9,240 9,250 15,300
. Total Finance Division $ 363,744 $ 511,219 $ 516l895
. , . ;
41
. ~
Fund: 001 General Fund Spokane Valley
Dept: 018 Operations & Administrative Services 2006 Budget
015 - Leqal Division
The City Attorney provides accurate and timely legal advice to the Council, City departments and advisory boards and commissions on a wide variety
of municipal issues to improve effectiveness and minimize risk of City operations.
r Additional funds have-been included in the budget for special counsel, which
may be needed from time to time. Funding has also been included for a Legal
Intem, who will provide assistance on a number of issues. • Accomplishments for 2005 .
• Drafted and negotiated new model agreements with Spokane County on all of the
service contracts to improve consistency and clarity. ' • Collaborated with staff to finalize developer agreements tfiat provide infrastructure
improvements or avoided potential litigation. - -
• Drafted/revised ordinance and contracts in support of all City departments. -
. Represented the City in various successful litigation matters which include land use,
~ J several code enforcement cases, and a small claims case. ,
Goals for 2006 '
• Develop and deliver training on issues that staff encounter on a regular basis.
• Draftlrevise or.dinances and contracts in support of all City departments.
Budqet Summarv
2005 2004 Amended 2006
Actual Budget Budget
Personnel - FTE Equivalents .
City Attomey - 0.0 1.0 . 1.0
Deputy City Attomey 1_0 . 1_0. 1_0 .
Total FTEs 1.0 2.0 2.0
Budqet Detail
Salaries, Wages, & Benefits $ 79,277 $ 128,945 $ 212,750
Supplies 2,383 2,300 5,500 '
_ Services & Charges 110,354 127,562 , 39,600
Interfund Charges 3,360 3,500 5,900 Total Legal Division - $ 195,374 $ 262,307 $ 263,750
42 .
Fund: 001 . General Fund Spokane Valtey " f
Depti 018 Operations & Administrative Services 2006 Budget 016 - Human Resources Division Human Resources (HR) is administered through the Deputy City Manager (DCM) who serves as the Human Resources Manager for the City. The NR operation
provides services in compensation, bsnefits, training and organizational development, staffing, employee relations, and communications.
Accomalishments for 2005
. Successfully negatiated City's first labor agreement.
• Developed New Employee Orientation program. .
I
• Finafized personnel policies and procedures for Human Resources Division.
• Developeti schedule for reviewing and revising City's job descriptions.
• Created Employee Newsletter to educate and inform employees,encourage interdepartmental communication and collaboration, and promote City Vision and
Values. ' .
. Conducted training classes for employees focused on operational needs, including computer, SEPA, and concuRency trainings. • Goals for 2006 . F,cpand City's web based intranet to help provide employees with resources and ,
tools to improve interdepartmental cooperation. .
• Develop pefsonnel handbook to inform employees of personnel relatetl pfllicies -
and procedures.
~ • Review and revise Human Resources forms. "
• Provide communications training opportunities for employees. Budqet Summarv •
2005
" 2004 Amended' 2006
. Actual Budget Budget
Personnel - FTE Equivalents -
Human Resource Analyst 0.0 1.0 1.0
Deputy City. Clerk . 0.5 0!5 0_5
Total FTEs 0.5 1.5 1.5
• Budqet Detail
Salaries, Wages, 8 Benefrts $ 29,322 $ 83,062 $ 100,620
. Supplies - 5,781 3,500 3,500
Services & Charges 5,285 81,821 53,300
_ Interfund Charges , 1,793 2,000 3,700
Total Human Resources Division $ 42,182 $ 170,383 $ 161,120
. ,
43
Fund: 001 General Fund Spokane Valley '
Dept: 032 Public Works 2006 Budget
032 - Public Works
The Public Works Department provides overall planning and oversight of public
works projects in the City of Spokane Valley. The department provides
engineering plan review, inspection, coordination of inajor public works caPital improverrient projects, long-range transportation planning and neighborhood traffic
management. The Public Works Street Maintenance Section is-responsibfe for
maintenance of streets.
' Accomplishments for 2005
• Continued analysis and review with the County, City of Spokane, and Department of Ecology regarding Wastewater Treatment Facility options. . • VVorlced with the Regional Wastewater Committee to evaluate the possibilities of a
Spokane Regional Wastewater Alliance. • Began development of a Public Works strategic plan tfiat will provide a blueprint for the development of the department_ .
. Managed and refined contract with Spokane County and others for public works
services and construction. " . -
Provided engineenng review and support for City funded projects and other. Ciry
public woiics needs. ' . Developed the Six-Year Transportation Plan (TIP) for Council adoption. . • Provided public worlcs expertise in the Comprehensive Planning effort: . Provided Development Review on new Commercial Development Projects, Single
Family Lots, and Multi-Family Units. ' Implemented and closely supervised the major Street Capital Projects. ,
Goals for 2006
• Analyze and review with tfie County, City of Spokane, and Departmerit of Ecology •
regarding Wastewater Treatment Facility options.
. Work with the Regional Wastewater Committee to evaluate the possibilities of a
Spokane Regional Wastewater Alliance. • Manage and refine contract with Spokane County and other for public works '
services and construction.
.
44
I
Fund: 001 General Fund Spokane Valley `
Dept 032 Public Works - 2006 Budget ~
032 - Public Works
Goals for 2006, Continued • Provide engineering review and support for City fundedprojects and other City
. public works needs.
• Develop the Six-Year Transportation Plan (TIP) for Council adoption. .
• Implement and closely supervise the major Street Capital Projects.
• Provide Development Review on new Commercial Development Projects, Single
Family Lots, and Multi-Family Units. '
• Update Street Design Standards. Budqet Summary
. 2005
2004 Amended 2006 Actual Budget Budget
Personnel - FTE Equivalents Public Works Director 1.0 1.0 1.0 -
Administrative Assistant 1.0 1.0 1.0
Senior Engineer (Development) 1.0• ' 11.0 1.0
Senior Engineer , 0.0 0.4 0.0
Assistant Engineer (Development) 1.0 1.0 1.0
Senior Engineer.(CIP) 1.0 1.0 1.0
Engineer (CIP) 0.0. 1:0 1.0
Engineer (Development) 0.0 1.0 1.0 '
_ Assistant Engineer (CIP) 1.0 1.0 1.0
Engineering Technician 1_0 1_0 1_0
. Total FTEs . 7.0 9.4 9.0
Budqet Detail
Salaries, Wages, & Benefrts 526,093 $ 718,392 808,846 Supplies 16,048 29,878 42,667
Services 8 Charges 26,769 35,120 - 59,415 .
Intergovemmental Payments - ' - 10,000
CapitalOutlay ' 31,866 - 22,500
Interfund Charges _ 14,994 17,100 36,744
Total Public Works $ 615,769 $ 800;490 $ 980,192
- ~
- 45 '
~ ' .
Fund: 001 General Fund spokane vauey
Dept: oss Planning & Community Development 2006 Budget
058 - Planninq & Community Development
The Planning & Community Development Department provides overall management
and oversight of development services including current and long-range
' planning, coordination of regional environmental issues, building permitting and inspections, and code enforcement. The Permit Center provides.coordinateri, one-stop administration of all development permits. The Corle Enforcement Officer
is responsible for the enforcement of zoning regulations and nuisance.abatement.
058 - Plannlnq Division '
The Planning Division is responsible for providing professional policy guidance
on land use issues to the City Council and Planning Commission.. It is also
responsible for processing land *use permits, reviewing environmentally sensitive
areas, and providing code enforcement services.
Accomplishments for 2005 -
. • Complete the Comprehensive Plan. • Created or updated several applic,ations and handouts in an effort to clarify land use
processes and improve customer service. * .
• Provided SRTC updated land use information based on GIS analysis of draft
comprehensive plan. - . ,
• Finalized the Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) Plan. • Created a digital library including information on property ownership, wetlands,
transportation,. and zoning. .
. % .
46
Fund: 001 General Fund Spokane Valiey
Dept: 058 Planning & Community Development 2006 Budget
, - - 058'- Planninq Division
Goals for 2006 .
• Update the Shoreline Master Program.
• Complete regulations implementing the Comprehensive Plan within the Uniform
Development Code. • Complete land use actions implementing the Comprehensive Flan. • Implement staff training and professional development program'.
. Establish criteria for the AutroRow overlay district. .
Budqet Summary
2004
Amended 2005 2006
. Budget Budget . ; Budget Personnel - FTE Equivalents
Communify Development Director 1.0 1.0 . 1.0 ,
Senior Planner 0.0 1.0 1.0. Planning Manager 1:0 1.0 1.0
Planning Manager - Current 1.0 0.0 • 0.0
Associate Planner - Long-Range 1.0 . 1.0 1.0
Associate Planner - Current 1.0 1.0 ' 1.0
Assistant Planner ' - 2.0 1.0 ' 1.0 .
Planning Technician 1.0 1.0 - 1.0
. Administrative Assistant 1_0 1_0 1_0 '
Total FTEs 9.0 8.0 8.0 Budqet Detail '
Salaries, Wages, & Benefits $ 522,679 $ 633,301 $ 589,278
Supplies 17,776 16,250 18,200 ,
Services & Gharges . 187,374 264,955 • 466,034
Capital Outlay - - 7,500
Interfund Charges 20,284 13,500 14,796
Total Planning Division $ 748,112 $ 928,006 $ 1,095,808
. . ;
r
47
~ •
Fund: 001 •General Fund Spokanevafley
Oept OSB Planning & Community Development 2006 Budget
059 - Buildinq Drvision •
The Building Divisiori implements the Washington State Building Code. It is
responsible for ensuring that buildings and structures cflmply with adopted buitding
code standards through professionaJ plan review and inspection services.. Ths Permit
Center receives applications and caordinates the review and processing of permits.
Accomolishments for 2005 -
• Integrate Building and Code Compliance provision with the Uniform Developmsnt
. Gode. • Implemented Regional Pavement Cut Pofcy.
. Completed implementation of the PLUS permitting system.
• Formalized building plan review processes.
• Reduced back(og of Code complaints by 50%. ' . ,
Goals for 2006 •
: Canfinue ataff training and professional development. '
• Complete pavement cut tracking systems. ,
. Implement full enforcement of adopted sign regulations.
• Complete Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan.
• Expedite commercial permit issuance.
Budqet SummarY '
, 2005.
2004 Amended 2006 • • • Actual Budget Budget - PersQnnal - FTE Equivalents , . . • ' Building Official 1.0 1.0. 1.0 . '
Building Inspector II 2.0 3.0 3.0 . Code Enforcement Officer ' 2.0 2.0 2.0
. .
Construction Inspector 0_0 . 2.0 , 2.0
Senior Permit Speciafist 0.0' 1.0 1.0.
Perrnit Specialist - 2.0 3.0 3.0
Senior Plans Examiner 0.0 . 1.0 1.0
Plans Examiner 1_0 0_0 . 0_0
' Total FTEs 8.0 - 13.0 13.0
, Budget Detail ° •
, Salaries, Wages, & Benefits $ 540,083 $ 654,56fi $ 848,929
Suppfies . 48,054 33,375 . 38,575
. Services & Charges 62,512 49,015 70,635
Intergovemmentall'ayments - 31,240 31,240
CapitalOutlay 12,276- 6,449 • 10,649
Interfund Charges 31,440 26,664 40,864
. .
, Total Building Qivision 694,366 $ 801,309 $ 1,040,892
. 48
Fund: 001 Generdl Fund Spokane Valley
nept 076 Parks & Recreation 2006 Budget 076 - Parks & Recreation,
' The Parks and Recreation Department is composed of flve divisions, the
AdministratEon and Park Maintenance Division, Recreation, Aquatics, Senior Center, • •
and fhe CenterPlace Division. The overall gaal of the department is to provide quality
recreation programs and acquisition, renovation, development, operation, and maintenance of parks and recreation facitities. .
000 - Parics Administration & Maintenance Division
The Administration Division provides direction and leadership for the Parks and
• Recreation Departmsnt in implementing the goals and objecUves of t6e City Coundl
and facilitates the general upkeep of parks and public areas of the City.
Accomalishments for 2005 ' • Assisted in project management of CenterPlace oonstruction.
• Compteted the Parks and Recreation Master Plan.
• Completed the pool feasibility study. '
• Dedication/Grand Opening of the CenterPlace facitity.
• Awarded and managed park maintenance contrad with Senske 7nee and Lawn Care.
' • Awarded and managed aquatic facility operation and maintenance contract with
' the YMCA. • ' '
" • Awarded the janitorial contract for CenterPlaoe. • Compfeted training and implementation of new CenterPlace and Recreation •
program registration sofiware. - • - "
' Goals for 2006
. Maximize the'use of CenterPlace. ' .
• Ev3luate and manage the aquatics opEration and maintenance contract.
• Pursue implementaHon of capital projects identified in Master Plan. • -
Pursue grant opportunities to complete park improvement projects.
Budaet Summarv 2005
, 2004 Amended 2006
Actual Budget. Budget
Personnel - FTE Equivalents •
Parks & Recreation Direckor • 1.0 1.0 1.0
'Administrative Assistant • 1_0 1_0 • 1_0 .
. Total FTEs 2.0 2.0 2.0
• Budget Datail Salaries, Wages, & genefits $ 144,126 $ 162,718 $ 162,236
Supplies ~ 36,641 ' 9,580. 48;340
Services 8 Charges 742,943 894,954 634,127
CapitalOutlay ' 32,211 - -
Interfund Charges ' . 5,040 3,000 • 11,340
, Total Parks Administration $ 850,961 $ 1,070,262 $ 656,003
49 .
i-
Fund: 001 General Fund Spokane Valtey
Dept: 076 Parics & Recreation 2006 Budget
301 - Recreation Division
The Recreation Division coordinetes and facilitates the delivery of recreation programs
and services throughout the city and'the City's park system. .
Accomplishments for 2005
• Offered 10 weeks of "Summer Day Camp" instead of the 9 weeks in 2004.
• Expanded Marketing of Summer Programs: Newspaper, Schools; S.C.O.P.E
• Interviewed and hired summer staff. • Continued Forming Recreation Program Policy. '
- • Contributed to the Grand Opening of CenterPlace.
• Conducted "Walk Across Washington" event. .
Goals for 2006 '
• Incorporate Master Plan Results into Recreation'Programming and Policy....
• To expand the Recreation Programs to coincide with the Master Plan.
• Implemented goals and policies implemented by Master Plan. •'Continue to offer "Walk Across Washington" Event.
' Continue Ser.ving As A Clearinghouse For Citizen Recreation Program Needs; •
Networtc With And refer Customei-s To Other Providers.
Budqet SummarY
. . . 2005
2004 Amended 2006
` Actual Budget Budget
Personnel - FTE_Equivalents . '
Recreation Coordiriator - 1.0 1.0 . 1.0
Budpet Detail Salaries, Wages, & Benefits $ 45,153 $ 116,790 $ 138,575
Supplies 1,655 8,555 4,078
Services & Charges 22,405 24,930 48,882
Interfund Charges 8,120 7,940 7,940
Total Recreation Division $ 77,333 $ 158,215 $ 199,475
( ~ .
50
\
Fund: 001 General Fund Spokane Valley
oept: 076 Parks & Recreation 2006 Buciget
302 - Aquatics Division
The City of Spokane Valley owns three pools: Park Road Pool, Terrace View Pool, and
Valley Mission Pool. Services include Open Swim, Swim Lessons, Swim Team and
facility rentals. In addition, the City leases a portion of Valley Mission Park to Splashdown
Inc. for a water park. .
- The City cuRently is contracting witfi the Y.M.C.A for all aquatic activities within the
City. The Y.M.C.A provides the Iifeguards and maintains the pools during the season.
Accomplishments for 2005
• The pool season was extended by opening earlier.
• Worked on review and approval of Splashdown request for expansion.
• Created RFP and awarded contract for the Operation and Maintenance of City Pools.
• New Diving boards were installed at all City pools. Goals for 2006 • Review and evaluafe aquatic contract. . - ;
• Evaluate plari to improve existing pools as per the Pool Fea'sibiliry Study.
Budqet Summary
' •
: 2005
2004 Amended 2006
Actual 'Budget Budget
Bud et Detail - • '
Services & Charges $ 238,492 $ 255,818 $ 299,921
. Capital Outlay 11;055 - -
Total Aquatics Division ' $ 249,547 $ 255,818 $ 299,921 ,
. , j
51
%Fund: 001 . Generai Fund Spokane Valley
Dept: 076 Parks & Recreation 2006 Budget
304 - Senior Center Division The City of Spokane Valley Parks and Recreation Department assumed operational
control of the Valley Senior Center in 2003. Accomp(ishments for 2005
• Participated in AdHoc Committee to determine future Gity/Senior Citizen Association
role at CenterPlace.
• Outreach to retirement and assisted living facilities in area to increase participation.
• Contacted Carver Farms for assistance on greenhouse project at CenterPlace.
• Increased volunteerism and opportunities and recognition.
Goals fo'r 2006 .
• Increase public awareness of CenterPlace and Senior Center. ' . '
• U61ize staff and wellness center. ' .
• Organize and plan activities in conjunction with YMCA.
• Gontinue and expand resource and referral program.
• Cross train other employees within Parks and Recreation.
• Budqet Summarv
2005. '
2004 Amended 2006
Actuafs Budget Budget
Personnel - FTE Equivalents
Senior Center Super'visor 1.0 1.0 1.0
Budaet Detail .
Salaries, Wages, & Benefrts $ 61,341 $ 78,998 $ 49,999
Supplies' 734 2,600 4,800
Services & Charges 12,291 43,494 12,570
Interfund Charges 3,360 1,500 1,900
Total Senior Center Division $ 77,726 $ 126,592 $ 69,269
.
~ . .
' . .
52
Fund: 001 General Fund • sPokanevauey ~Qept 076 -Parks & Recreation 2006 Budget
305 - CenterPlace D'rvision
Construction of Mirabeau Point CenterPlace began in late 2003, and was completed
mid-year 2005. The project represents the culmination of eight years of ptanning
and fundraising by Mirabeau Point Inc. and the joint invotvement of the City and
Spokane County. This $10 million project is financed through numerous aorporate,
individual and service cfub donations along with funding support from the
Public Facitities District. The City will be responsible for the construction, finance and
operation of the new.facility. At total build out, the approximately 54,000 square foot
facility will houss the new City of Spokane Valley Senior Genter, a great room (banquet
facility), numerous meeting rooms, multi purpose rooms and a high tech lecture hall.
The facility will combine witfi Mirabeau Meadows Park and Mirabeau Springs to ,
form a regional focal point for Northeast Washington and Northem Idaho. - Accomplishments for 2005 • Initiated hiring process for CenterPlace Manager and other GenterPlace staff. -
. Construction completed, furniture completed, kitchenware order complete.
. Develop rental contract, policies, and procedures. .
Goals for 2006 . Complete Marketinq Plan and Materials. \
• Complete Policies and Procedure Manual for CenterPlace. ,
• Complete New Advertising.
• Research Grant Opportunities. . '
• Increase public awareness of CenterPlace.
. • Develop a Customer Service Place for all emptoyees at CenterPlace.
Budqet Summarv - • 2005 •
2004 Amended 2006. .
. Actual Budget Budget
Personnel - FTE Equivalents .
CenterPlace Caorclinator 1.0 1.0 1.0
• Administrative Assistant ' 0.0 1.0 1.0 •
- Maintenance Worker 0_0 1_0 1_0 • • Total FTEs 1.0 3.0 3.0 .
Bud_ eail " Salaries, Wages, & Benefits $ - $ 144,848 $ 186,263
Supplies . 647 10,075 12,830
Services & Charges 1,858 146,325 239,205
Capital0utlay 10,490 45,551 -Interfund Charges , 1,680 ' 1,500 -
Total CenterPlace Division $ 14,675 $ 348,299 $ 438,298
. , = 1
53
~ Fund: Odi C+enC1'SH Fund Spokene vaDey
" Dcp~ 690 GCnCtal Governmerst 2006 Bttdget 090 - Generdl Governmr.rrt
1Te General Gavemment Department comprisss activifies tha; enmmpass servlces
tn mudlple department& InGudsd tn Ws department are ihe cxisLS of city hail and
rela6ed uhTdies, managemonl infamsation services, insurance arsis, misoellaneous
arj tnt£rgovammental casLS and capiffiI eauipmsnt oosas that henefit morz than
one depastmp-rt and ou+side 3gervcY fundirh7• oertside 9per►c-es provide needed pubft
servic.. on bchaEf af the City. 1'he outside arrencies musi grovide an annual report of bow
Ehe money was speni
eudaM Summarv •
• 2003
2004 Artrended 2005 •
Achiai Budget Budget
Budaet-De:r37 -
, . Gaicm1 G7yHnids Casts
AccounUlug & Autfit Services y 43,777 $ 205,900 $ 140,000
SnRware 69aintananCC 36,773 33,000 40,U00
Etedfon Costs 63,600 50,000 60,OOD •
Busirtess RegfStraUons 19,OT7 15,000 15,000
AdverEisinq 16,063 31,550 40,000
Fn~pldyee Reoognffian - 3,000 3,000
Weli Page . • 6,918 S,OOiO 5,000
TclephonelDSLCharge.g 14,440 20,000 20,000
• IT Consut6n9 88,470 70,000 90,000 '
- Permilting Soflmre 27.658 - -
SiudentAdvisayGaunal ftl8 500 . 5U0
' Opei3ting Suppiies - - 5,000 4,000 .
Smalt Tools and Minor Euuiprn2nt - - 2~ooo . ,
Spokane Cutmty ConEmd - GIS - - 20,000
Gapier 1.9alntemence , - - 8,560
~ \ • VehEde Cteptacement Ccmk - - 9,000 •
ldiscEllanaous 4.367. 20,000 20,000
lntetlu,md '
Interfirnd I.oan Interest 43,136 75,000 - Iniertund Risk Manapement P3yment 130,000 530,000 165,000
Oper utfnq Ym,ftter - Loan Repayment - 1,231,105 - '
Fai'ii,tias . ,
• Facilily Repairs & PAain?enance 1,282 - 5,000 ,
I+Gsoel?aneous Buibdfng fAalntertianco - 5,000 -
Cacrt1putor Software and HardNare - 185,000 110,000 . •
TmMter ID StreCt Capital Fund 800,0e70 - .
Trensfer to P8ft CapiLal Fund - 350,000 750,000
Oily Natl Leasing Costs: '
CiPy Ftall Ften! 229,129 251,055 305.000
Le-ischotd Mprovemenis 79,818 53,745 15,000
5torage Space R Parfeing • 3,000 3,000 - -
OutsFdo Se.rriees
MembetshPp, - SRTC 34,30D 36,000 36,000
• . Saie2y Edtrcatian & Prevenlfon - - 3,000
Alcohol Tre.9lment 17,513 19,UU0. 19,000 ,
• SpakanC Coennty Air Polluteon Authorily 114,946 118,918 119,000
Ciry Econom6c Development 950 10,000 , 10,000 ' Ca6bD Franchise Megotiafims 25 20.000 20,000
Voter RegRstra$on., - - 85,000
Impad Fee SEudy - . 50,000 50,000 ReRuesLS from Outside Ap_ncies-6conomlc Develoament 73,000 73,000 69,000
Requests from Oulside Agpncies-Social ServiCe ; 27,000 27,000 51,000
• CwrL'vrclencf' Q Rcscivcs
Reserve for F2cvertue /Wius4ments - 813,533 455,000
. Trarwfer to Civfc 6uilding Reserve Fund - 50U,000 600,00D .
• Trans(er to Scrvfce Level Resenre Fund - 1,000,000
Tcansfer to U'nnler VJea?her Resen•e Furr.1 - 500,000 • -
UpeeraUrtg - SUCCS Fund - 2,000,000 2,000,000 ConSngenc/ - 500,000 500,000
~--'I $ 1,075,355 5 9;196,308 $ 5,825,000
• '
54
. \
Fund: 101 Street Fund • Spoicano Vaitey
DePt: 042 2006 Budget
101 - Street Fund
The Street Operating program is estabiished to provide efficient and safe movement
of both motorized and non-motorized vehicles as well as pedestrians %vithin the limits
of the Ciry and coordinate convenient interconnect to the regional transportation •
system. .
. The transportation networics, under this program, are designed, constructed, and
maintained to improve the quality of fife while providing the effiaent moverrient of
commerce. '
Accomplishments for 2005
' . Operated and.maintained all City streets and the two state highvrays, SR 290 and SR 27,
• w9th the City limits.
• Confinued to oontract with Spokane County for engineering services related to operations
and maintenance of City streets
. Began development of a Neighbofiood Traffic Calming Management program.
. Worked with Community Developmnnt to ensure that adequate traftic and transportetion
mitigation is provided. Goals for 2006 •.Operate and maintain all City streets and the hw state highways, SfZ 290 and SR 27,
vaith the City limits. ' • .
• Continue to contract wilh Spokane County for enginesring services related to operations '
and maintenance of City streets. .
• Improve signal timing coorciination throughout the City. .
• Work vrith Community Development to ensure that adequate traffic and transportation
mitigation is provided.
. Complete a street inventory and assessment of all City streets and allrnv development of
. a six year street master plan and a 20-year pavement management plan in 2007. ,
Budaet Summarv
- 2005 .
2004 Amended , 2006
Actual • Budget Budget Personnel - FTE Lquivalents .
Senior Engineer - Traffic . 0.4 1.0 1.0
Pubfic Works Superintendent 1.0 1.0 1.0 ~
. Construction Inspedor • 1.4 1.0 1.0
Senior Engineer (Pla nning/G rants) 0.15 0.4 0_4
7otal FTEs 2.95 3.4 3.4
fludget Detail
Salaries, Wages, & Benefits $ 141,605 $ 198,354 $ 211,636
Supplies 5,044 13,280 16,950 '
Services & Charges 531,737 1,OOO,U00 1,210,880
• Intergovemmental Payments 2,434,537 • 4,424,38.4 2,660,700
InterFund Charges 34,300 167,140 31,290
Yotal Street Fund 3,147,223 $ 5,803,15$ $ 4,131,256
.
55
Fund: 102 Arteriai Street Fund spokane vaney
Dept: 041 2006 Budget
102 - Arteriai Street Fund The Arterial Street Fund accounts for the receipt and expenditure of the State-levied
motor vehicle fuel tax distnbuted to the City in accordance with State RCW 82.36_020_
These revenues will be transferred to the Street Capital Projects Fund for the construction.
•Budqet Summarv
2005
2004 Amended 2006 . Actual Budget Budget
Budaet Detail Transfer to Street Capital Projects $ 134,941 $ 670,400 $ 332,270
Transfer to Capital Grants Fund - 186,000 236,385
Improvements to Arterials - 229,603 ' -
• Total Arterial Street Fund $ 134,941 $ 1,086,003 $ 568,655
~
Fund: 103 . Trails & Paths Fund Spokane Valley
Dept: 103 . 2006 Budget
103 - Trails & Paths Fund
The Trails & Paths Fund accounts for the receipt and expenditure of the State-levied
motor vehicle fuel tax distributed to the City in accordance with State RCW 47.30.050.
These revenues originate from .42% of motor vehicle fuel tax aftributable to Street _
Maintenance. These funds are restricted for tfie purpose of constructing new trails and
paths throughout the City. No expenditures are budgeted for this fund in 2005 or 2006. .
- ~ •
~ 56
Fund: 105 Hotel/Motel Fund Spokane Valley
DePt: 105 ' 2006 Budget
• 105 - HotellMotel Fund
The Hotel/Motel Fund accounts for the receipt and expenditure of a special excise tax of
two percent on the sale or'charge made for the furnishing of lodging under RCW 82.08.
These funds will_be used solely for the purpose of paying all or any part of the cost of tourist
promotion, aoquisition or operation of tourism-related facilities, and marketing of special
events and fes6vals designed to attract tourists_
Budqet Summanr 2005
2004 Amended 2006 •
Actual Budget Budget
Bud et Detail
Tourism Promotion $ 450,383 $ 397,827 $ 360,667
Interfund Charges - 40,000 . 40,000
Total Hotel/Motel Fund . $ 450,383 $ 437,827 $ 400,667
J
57
;
Fund: 120 CenterPiace Operating Reserve Fund . spokane vailey
Dept 120. 2006 Budget
120 - CenterPlace Operatinq Reserve Fund The CenterPlace Operating Reserve Fund was established to provide an emergency revenue source for the recently completed facility. ,
Budget Summarv
2005
' - 2004 Amended 2006
• Actual Budget Budget
' Budget Detail
Reserve for CenterPlace Operations $ - $ 300,000 $ 340,000
~ Fund: 121 Service Level Stabilization Reserve Fund Spokane Valley Dept: 121 - 2006 Budget
121 - Service Level Stabilization Reserve Fund
The Service Level Stabilization Reserve Fund was established to provide an emergency
revenue source to maintain service levels-in the event of a downturn in the local economy.
Budqet Summary
. 2005
. 2004 Amended 2006
Actual Budget Budget
Budqet Detail - Reserve For Service Level .Stabilization $ - $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000
J . .
58
Fund: 122 Winter Weather Reserve Fund Spokane Valley
. Dept: 122 2006 Budget 122 - Winter Weatfier Reserve Fund
The Winter Weather Reserve Fund was established to provide emergency services
during an unusually harsh winter.
Budqet Summary
20052004 Amended 2006 . . Actual Budget Budget
- Bud et Detail -
Reserve for Winter Weather $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000
59
'
Fund: 204 Limrted Tax General Obligation - Debt Service Fund Spokane Valley
' Dept: 204 2006 Budget
204 - Limited Tax General Obliqation - Debt Service Fund
The LTGO - Debt Service Fund collects and distributes monies received and paid for
long-term debCobligations: Revenue to this fund consists of money received from the
Public Facility District and City revenue, which will be u"sed to pay annual debt obligations
on outstanding bonds. .
Budqet SummaN •
2005 • 2004 Amended 2006
Actual BudgetBudget
Budqet Detail '
Debt Service on Mirabeau Bonds $ 600,000 $ 397,745 $ 414,000
Debt Service on Street Bonds 200,000 185,090 186,000
Total Debt Service Fund $ 800,000 $ 582,835 $ 600,000
,
. •
;
60
Fund: 3011302 Capital Projects & Special Capital Projects Funds Spokane Valley
'2006 Budget
3011302 - Capital Projects & Special Capital Projects Funds
These funds account for the collection and expenditure of the real estate excise tax levied
on all sales of real estate. The tax is levied in two phases of a quarter of a percent each.
The first quarter percent of the real estate excise tax (REET 1) must be spent on capital
' improvements identified in a capital improvements plan. This REET ltax is accounted for
in the Capital Projects Fund 301. .
The second quarter percent (REET 2) may only be levied by cities that are planning under
the.Gro+rth Management Act. These funds must be used for a capital project.
The REET 2 tax is-accounted for in the Special Capital Projects Fund 302. -
Revenues accumulated in these funds will be used as matching funds for construction projects and will be transferred to other Capital Project Funds.
Budqet Summary
, . . . 2005 ,
• 2004 Amended 2006
' Actual Budget Budget ,
. ,
• 301 - Canital Proiects Fund . Transfer to Capital Grants Fund $ - $ - $ 1,117,000 Transfer to Debt Service 92,643 92,545 93,000
Transfer to Parks Master Plan . - 40,000 -
Transfer to General Fund 22,996 - -
Capital Projects - REET 1 - 1,773,359 -
Parks Capital Improvements - 200,000 -
Total Capital Projects Fund $ 115,639 $ 2,105,904 $ 1,210,000 •
- 302 - Special Capital Proiects Fund Transfer to'Street Capital Fund $ 200,000 $ 112,600 $ 977,713
Capital Frojects - REET 2 - 1,707,312 -
Transfer to Debt Service 92,643 92,545 93,000
Total Special Capital Projects Fund $ 292,643 $ 1,912,457. $ 1,070,713 • i
. 61
-
Fund: 303 Street Capit2tl Projects Fund Spokane Valley
. ' . 2006 Budget
303 - Street Capital Proiects Fund
The Street Capital Projects Fund accounts for monies used to finance the 6 year
transportation improvement plan. Revenues are transfers from tfie Arterial Street
• Fund, Capital Projects Fund, and Special Capital Projects Fund and the bond sale proceeds.
Expendifures are often for matching funds for Transpo►tation Improvement Board and
other grants.. . '
Budqet Summarv
2005
- 2004 Amended 2006
. . Actual Budget Budget Budqet Detail Road Design & Gonstrvctron Prnjects
PineslMansfield, Wilbur Rd. to Pines $ - $ 1,101,030 4,029,000
Sullivan Road Extension - _ 5,000 5,000
16th Avenue - Project 1 2,460.
16th Avenue - Project 2 ' 263,789 151,000 - -
Mission Avenue { 11,692 - - • Barker Road - Boone to Spokane River Bridge - 1,914,000 2,578,000
Barker Road - 8th to 32nd - - 40,000
Park Road - Project 2 148,092 - -
Evergreen Road 365,280 , 20,000 -
' Sullivan.Road and 4th Signal 14,511 - - - Valley Couplet 1,712 - . - ,
Valley Couplet - Project 2 - - -
" • Sullivan Bridge • 31,145 , - . . - •
Road Preservation Prolects Other Preservation Projects. 200,401 750,000 1,033,843
Contingency . - 150,000 150,000
Rosd Paveback (SeAtic Eliminafion) , . , Sipple 106,206 - -
Veradale Phase II 339,772 - -
Weatherwood/Owens 30,835 - -
Camahan - 148,300 • -
South Greenacres - 23,000 - -
Veradale Heights - ' - 200,000
Vera Terrace - - • 100,000
Electric Railroad 200,000 •
Orchard Avenue - , - - 50,000
Misc. Road Paveback Projects - 23,000 -
.
~ J Total Street Capital Projects Fund $ 1,515,896 $ 4,285,330 89385,843 .
•
62
. . , . . . %
Fund: 304 Mirabeau Point Capital Project Fund Spokane Vaitey
2006 Budget
Dept: 304
304 - Mirabeau Point Capital Proiect Fund
Mirabeau Point is a multi-use regional project focated at 2426 Discovery Place which
will be operated by the City. ' CenterPlace provides space for a Conference Center Wing, Senior Center Wing and
a Great Room Wing. The portion of CenterPlaoe used for the Conference Cgnter
. Wing and Great Room Wing is being developed as a"regional facility" as defined
• in RCW 36.100 and 35.57.020. •
• Budqet Summan~
2005
' 2004 Amended 2006
Actual Budget Budget
Budqet Detail . ' '
Construction in Progress $ 6,050,570 $ 3,000,000 $ 783,205
Bond Issue Costs 615 • - -
Total Mirabeau Point Project Fund $ 6,051,185 $ 3,000,000 $,783,205
' i
Fund: 305 Street Bond Capital- Projects Fund Spokane Valley
Dept: 305 ' 2005 Budget
305 - Street Bond Capital Proiects Fund
The Street Bond Capital Projects Fund accounts for monies received from bond
, proceeds which will be used for various capital street projects. •
Budqet Summary
2005
2004 Amended • 2006
Actual Budget Budget
Budqet Detail . .
Transfer to Street Capital Projects $ 1,174,323 $ 406,000 $ 902,460
Bond Issue Costs 304 - - Total Street.Bond Capital Fund $ 1,174,627 $ 406,000 $90~2,460_ . ;
. .
63
Fund: 307 Capital Grants Fund Spokane vaney
Dept, 307 • 2006 Budget
307 - Caqital Grants Fund
The Capital Grants Fund accounts far capital improvement projects funded parfialfy by
grant proceeds from other govemmental agencies, such as TIB, SRTC and BRAC. '
Revenues to this fund are from grant proceeds and transfers from other special revenue .
funds. ,
Budget Summarv
2005
2004 Amended 2006
• Actual Budget Budget
Budaet Detail • •
Barker Road Reconstruction $ 639,U00 $ 1,114,000 $ 97,000
24th Avenue Sidewafk Project 198,000 - -
8th Avenue = 1,136,000 -
Broadway Avenue - 812;000 ' 800,000
We1lesley.Avenue - 344,000 -
Park Road - 164,000 -
Dishman Mica Road - 41,000 160,000
Applevray Road. - 216,000 250,000
Valley Corridor - 200,000 1,340,000
Applevray Bhrd. - Tschirley Rd to Nodges - 297,000 1,919,000 ' •
Bndging the Valley - Park Rd/13NSF Grads = _ 2,45~0,000
. Montgomery Ave. Inlayl~2 - Argonne to University . 471,000
• Dishman Mica Rd Rehab - 1st Ave.to Spragiie - 135,000 -
' Valley Covplei, Project #2 _ - 234,000 -
Argonne Rd Overlay - Indiana to Montgornery - 317,000 307,000
• Mission Ave. Sidewalk - Mullan to University - - 417,000
Total Gapital Grants Fund , 837 000 $ 5~010,000 $ 8,211,000
[Fuiid: 308 Bar9ccr Bridge - Federal Grent Fund Spokane valley
ept 308 2006 Budget
308 - Baflcer Brtidqe - Federal Grant Fund 7he Bark&Bridge -Federal Grant Fund was cxeated to account for the revenues and
_ expenditures associated with the Barker Road Bridge Replacement Project_ 7his project
• is fully funded by BfZAC grant prooeeds and will cost approximately $9,000,000 over the .
course of the next few years.
Budget Summarv
2005 2004 Amended 2006
Actual Budget Budget
~ Budget petail
Barker Road Bridge Replacement Project • S 53 $ 3501000 $ 558,000 •
' 64
. .1
Fund: 309 Parks Capital Projects Fund Spokane Valley
Dept: 309 2006 Budget
309 - Parks Capital Proiects Fund
The Parks Capital Projects Fund is an allocated reserve of monies specifically designated
for the Parks and Recreation Capital plan.
_ Budqet SummaN
2005
2004 Amended 2006
. Actual Budget Budget
Budget Detail •
Par1c Master Capital Plan Pending $ - $ 550,000 $ 1,300,000
Total Parks Capital Project Fund $ - $ 550,000 1,300,000
Fund: 310 . Civic Buildings Capital Projects Fund Spokane Valley
Dept: 310 . 2006 Budget '
310 - Civic Buildinqs Capital Proiects Fund
The Civic Buildings Capital Projects Fund is an allocated reserve of monies specifically •
deslgnated for future construction of a Civic Buildings. -
• Budqet SummarY .
2005 2004 Amended 2006
' Actual Budget Budget
Total Civic Buildings Capital Fund $ 500,000 1,100,000
65
Fund: 402 Stormwater Management Fund SPokane vattey
Dept- 402 2006 Budget
402 - Stormwater Manaqement Fund
The Stormwater Management fund accounts for receipt and expenditure of the stormwrater
fee. This fee is levied on an annual basis baseri upon a number of equivelent residentiai
units attached to the parcel. '
. The expenditures are used for stormwater oonstruction and management tffrough both
the Street Departrnent and Spokane County. Accomplishments for 2005
• Designed and implemented soluGons for existing drainage problems. ,
• PerFormed floodplain permit engineering review. . . Began development of a six year pfan for construction of regional and semi-regional
drainage facilities.
• Managed the swale inspection program. '
. Development of the Regional stormwater design manual:
Goals for 2006 - • Design and implement salutions for existing drainage problems. ,
• Perform floodplain permit engineering review.
. . Manage the swale inspection program. .
. • Complete six year plan for caonstruction of regional and semi-regional drainage facilities. .
. Adopt and implement the Regional Stormwater Design Manual. '
Budget Summarv
2005
2004 Amended ' 2006
Actual Budget 'Budget
Personnel = FTE EQUivalents .
Engineer 0.0 • 1.0. 1.0
Engineering Technician 0_0 1.0 1_0
Total FTEs OA 2.0 - 2.0
Budget Detail .
Salaries, Wages, & Benefits $ - $ 151,112 $ 147,774
Supplies • - 22,700 13,490
Services & Charges 65,183 790,505 64,939
Intergovernmentaf Payments 9,858 817,102 815,184
CapitalOutlay . - • 20,000 350,000
Interfund Transfers - 259,607 230,147
" Total Stormwater Fund $75,041 $ 2,061,026 $ 1,621,534
~ J -
• 66
. \
Fund: 501 . Equipment Rental & Replacement Fund Spokane Valley ;Dept: 501 2006 Budget
501 - Equipment Rental & Realacement Fund The Equipment Rental & Replacement Fund (ER&R) accounts for the cost of maintaining
and replacing City vehicles and equipment for all City departments. The ER&R fund is an
Internal Service fund. .
The fund accumulates the resources for vehicle and equipment replacements in the fund.
The Funds or Departments using the vehicle or equipment pay the scheduled
replacement fee. Replacement funds are being collected on the telephone system, computer network
system, desktop computers, and.vehicles. Maintenance and service charges for copiers,
telephones, and the internet are also charged to funds through this department
The fund also finances and administers a fleet of pool cars for use by City departments.
Accomplrshments for 2005
• Administered an accounting system for replacement costs for city equipment.
• Setup and administer an inventory tracking system.
Goals for 2006 . '
~
• Continue to administer and refine the accounting system forreplacement costs.
Budget Summary .
2005
2004 Amended 2006
Actual Budget Budget
Budqet Detail . ' Supplies $ 8,926 $ 7,500 $ 7,500 .
Services & Charges 308 25,000 509000
CapitalOutlay 2,388 240,392 635,757
Total ER&R Fund $ 11,622 $ 272,892 $ 693,257
67
F'und: 502 Risk Management Fund Spokane Valley
Dept: 502 2006 Budget
' 502 - Risk Manaqement Fund
The City of Spokane Valley Risk Management Fund is established to account for
insurance costs, claims settlemerit and administration of a risk management safety
program. This ftand also accounts for the funding of unemployment claims through the
' State of Washington. Accomplishments for 2005
. Adrninistered an accounting system for the risk management internal service fund.
Goals for 2006
• Continue to administer and refine the risk management intemal service fund accounting
system. - • Budqet Summary .
2005
2004 Amended 2006 Actual Budget Budget
Budqet Detail
Services & Charges $ 111,066 $ 140,828 $ 189,939
• Total Risk Management Fund $ 111,066 $ 140,828 $ 189,939
68
City of Spokane Valley
. ~
Genera{ Fund ~ .,Capital Expenditures for 2006
Revenue Source
Department Capital Outlay Description Total Ci / REET 1'
032 Public Works Vehicle $ 22,500 $ 22,500 -
058 Planning , .
Office Fumiture 8 Equipment 7,500 7,500 -
' 059 Building . Office Fumiture & Equipment • 10,649 10,649 -
090 General Govemmont •
Leasehobd improvements 15,000 15,000 -
• . Total Capitai Expenditures 5 55,649 ' 55 649 -
'Real Estate Excise Tax 1 . l.
69 '
, City of Spokano Vnllay ' •
Capltat Expondltutos for 20438 -
Mlraboau
Potnt ArtoAal
• • • . Band Stroot Band Sifoot Department CapNa1 Outtay DascrlpiEon Total •ProcoWs Procoods REET 1' REET Z" Furtd TIH"" SItTC•'•• BRI1C""'
307 SUout Caplial Fwttl • .
Rasd OeSigp~Constnadl9n Prolesis .
PinuslManstield, Wi[trurRd, to Pines S 4,029,000 , 68,000 1,790,400 2,171,000
' Sullirstl RocW Extenslon - , 5.000 5.000.
• Berker Road - Baone tn Spokano Rlver BrlQgc • 2,578,ODD _ 515,G00 2,002,400
Barker Road - 8th w 32nc1 . 40,000 • 40,000
IRnad Prnsenvnlfat Prolects ,
SaItC&0 Road (Eaergrcen to Sullhran) 14,483 14,483
SCAafoc Road (161h'Avo to Blate Rtl) 19,350 ' 18,360
9roadhray and FonMcrlrwsedion 500,000 388,617 1311,363
. Idfte. Pmjecte (1Edh ro 24N) 500,ODD 500,400
.
. Roatl Priveback fSepllc Tlttt Elimfnetinn Proa~
, Verodelo HeiBhts 200,000 ZOO,ODO
, Vera Tcvrace 100.0pp ' 17,739 62,270
ElcCric Railroad 200,000 200,000
, Orchard Avcnuo 50,000 50,000
. 307 Capltal Gr'anfa Fund
Road Dcsian 8 Ccnslruuion Proieets . '
Barker Road . 97,000 17,000 80,000
Applawny Ro3d ' 250,000 33,750 210,m,
• Va1leyCqQitBOt-Rrojecl2 1,340,000 785.000 31,590 523,410
• Applerray BNd. -7sGtiAay Rd to Motlges , 1,914,000 259,000 1,G60,UW
Bridging Ehe Valtey 2,450,000 123,000 2,327,000
BnacLPreservatfon Prolecix ,
• Brosaway Avwxie 800,000 100,000 G92,000
hlAntgorricry Ave, Inl3y S2 . 471,0130 • 471,000
fvgotvw Rd Oveday ' 307.000 41,445 265,555
A;I,sian Ave. SideKalk 457,000 55,000 361,000
3OB Barker Brfdgo • Fed Gront Fund Dishman Mica RwW 9W,000 21,600 138,400
•
Barker Road Bridgo Recon.WCJon x58,000 658,000
SOA tAlrnpoau Polnt '
CansUVqion in Progre.s 783.205 783,205
Total Capltal ExReodltuma $1 7.TE8,048 783,205 902,460 1 000 977 13 S96 666 4 BB7 4QD 7 3.615 558,0001
'i2cal EStae ExCi,^,o'I'ac 1 '
"Raal Estale Fxcise Tax Z . '
^'i'ransNortalian Impcrvcmem Board (Stato Funds). - • ,
"•'•Spo7cane Reyionel TransparWon Caunctl (Fcdcral Furttls) •••.•9ridgQ Replau:mcnt Advtsoty Comm[ttee (Fedcral Fwod9)
70
Poenloo Llsung .
City oT 9pokano Valley
2008 BuCpcfM Pwttlons ,
~
TIUe ° Unlllled ~ y~ oT
ti
CITY h7iWAGER
OEI'UiY CIiY MANAGE(L 1,0
'
CffY ATfORNFY 1,0 ' 1.U
OON~\fUNITY D~f,QG+N.ENT ulhkCTOk ~ 0 ~ U
f'V6UC Y.'ORKS DIRECTOR ~ q . } O
FINANCE I~IRtCT(7G2 • ' 1A ' iA
PARIGS R 3tECREATION OIREC707t , ~ ~
CfTY CLERK 1.0 •
C-NGINEER 1.9
Z,p 1.U 3.0
PLANNING AIMl,AG£R 1.U 1.U
DE•P4IfY Cf1Y AITORNEY ~,p 1,0
CENYERVLACE WORDINATOR ~,0 IA
3EkIQR Eh~GINCER ' 20 1,4 3.4
aSSwrnrR EvGINF:ER 20 2.0
F.,'GINEER11dG TE(HNICfAN 1.0 1.9 2.0
SFNIOGt i+IANNER • 1.0
S.0
ASSOCIA'fE F'lAitNER - CURRENY 1.0 Lp
ASSOCIATE PLAhhEH - LONG'i'ERIA . 1.0 1.0
A$SISTAtdT HIANNER 1.0 1.0
OOOt £NfORCEM.ENT OPFICER Zq 2 U
t1UtiDING OFFICULL. 1.0 1.0
BV.IDING INSP~CiOR II • 3.0 a.0
e'U101NG IKSPECTOk I ~
PIANS E7fANIN-R f.0 1A
P[RMIT SPEGAUST 4 ~ 4 0
PI.AN~JING TECHNICUAJ t.0
PUBLIC 1'~'ORKS SVFEF~IME,KDEhtf S.0
RECREATION COORDINA707t • 1.0 ' 1,0
AQNINIS7RA71YE A?fALYST 1.0 IA
A00OUNI'ANTlFiUpCE7 Atl0.LYSY 2.0 2.9
PUBUC INI"OkMA7iOh OFFICER 1.0 1.0
HUNfut AESOUtiCE ANALY37 '
ACCOUNTINCi MAFIA,CER 1.0 1.0 1.0
S.0
R.iP'ECWI.IST . . .9:0 1.9
SEA70R CE.MiER SPECtAUST LO 1.4
D[PUTYCRYCI.ERK ' O.B . . 015 1.0
A1M11NISTRATNEA$$ISTANT 2.0 20 119 1,0 1.0 1.0 8.0
OFFICE ASSISTNIT 11 ' 1,0 1.0
AOppUNTlf.'G TEC?UNVAN 1.4 Lo
. Ma1TifEf2,ANCE WOG1KtR , 110 • 1.0
COttSTRUCtSON INSPEC103t 2,0 0.4 2.4
ToWb 4.5 8.0 ' GO 2.0 1.8 BA 8.0 13.0 20 1.0 tA 3.0 2,8 7.U Bi.s
' funding Sourco~ General Fund ~ Slrcct I 6tarmwater I
Fund FunA !
- ~
. 7i
.
City of Spokane Valley
FTE Count by Year
2006 Budget .
2005 2005 2006 Budget
Authorized FTE Proposed
Department FTEs Additions FTEs
Executivve & Legislative Support 4.5 - 4.5
OperaUons & Administrafive Servrces_
Deputy City Manager 6.0 . 6.0
, Finance _ 6.0 6.0
Legal ' 2_0 - 2.0
Human Resources 1.5 - 1.5
Public Works 9.0 - 9.0
Plannirig & Comniunity Development
Planning 8.0 8.0
Bu'ilding 13.0 .13.0
Parics & Recreation:
Parks Admin 2•0 - 2.0
Recreation . 1.0 - 1.0
Senior Center 1.0 , - _ 1.0
CenterPlace V • 3.0 - . 3.0
Street Fund . 2.8 ' 2•8
Stormwater Fund 2.0 2.0
• TOTAL 61:80 - 61.80
, . . ' •
J • ' .
• 72
- _ ~ ~"F . a '
~ ~r t p 1A ~
~rF.
.-...._(s~~
. ~ ':~i
;~.'POpULA~T,iON~, 'N:,,,vFULL TlINE~,~~~~`.~..-~'~, T
Seattle ~ 573,000 a 9,496 907
Tacoma 198,100 3,294 51
Spokane 198,700 1,906 9
Bellevue 115,500 1,191 54
Everett . 97,500 1,036 15 Vancouver 154,800 1,026 24
Kent 84,920 758 26
Bellingham 72,320 748 53
Yakima 79,480 648 14
- Renton 56,840 569 23
Kennewick 60,410 351 8
Federal Wa 85,800 283 20 . '
Lakewood . 58,850 219 10
Shoreline 52,500 120 17
S okane Valle 85,010 60 3
. ' ' AVERAGE 1,443 82
..._~~...~;9_
MEN :~a ~y',"~~ .a R ✓ . J
.
r~4 { ~ _.i`~~;
yi ~7.Iis3 .~~r.rn}_ •yl •
Redmond 47,600 54540
Richland 43,520 543 13
Olympia 43,330 509 46
Auburn 47,470 452 2
Kirkland 45,740 399 35
Bremerton 34,580 339 40 . .
L nnwood 34,830 331 26
Pu allup 35,830 315 24
Longview 35,340 290 ' 25 ,
Edmonds 39,860 270 7
Bothell 31,000 254 7
Walla Walla 30,630 253 9
Pasco 44,190 242 9 .
Lacey 33,180 206 8
Marysville 29,460 201 10 '
Sammamish 38,640 67 0
University Place 30,960 58 3
Burien 31,040 40 13
AVERAGE 295 18
Source: Association of Washington Cities Survey: 2005 Full Time
73
jValley .
CON24[JNITY Y1tOFILE AN'D H7STORY
"You cannot look to the funcre if you do not knotiv the pust. " -
On May 21, 2002, voters within the City approved incorporation of the City of Spokane
VaLley, which is the second:largest city in the Caunty and'the eighth largest city in the
State, with approx.imately 85,010 residents. The City incorporated as of March 31, 2003.
The assessed valuation of real property Nvithin the boundaries of the City- for taxation
purposes is estimated #'or 2005 tax collection to be approximately $5,032,000,000.
Spnkane Valley enccimpasses approx.imately 38.2 square miles of land area. rt has an
cYtensive retail tax base and is home to several major auto dealerships and the Spokane
Valley Mall, which includes over 700,000 square feet of gross leasablc floor azea. There
. are an estimaled 4,000 businestes in Spcikane Valley with estimated i-cfail sales of $1.66
bil.lion. . .
. . .n•. , .
"lhe first pennanent settler in the Spokane Valley «ras A.ntoi.ne Plante; a retir.ed- French- Canadian trapper: IVIr. Plante built a cabin near the Spokane ltiver i.n 1849, from Nvhich
he ciperated a small EIucisdn's Bay. C'ompany trading post. Other settlers began arriving
in this area between 1$65 and 1882. "Pirsts" to occu.r in Spokane Va11ey include the first
settler in 1849, f rst bu''siness and ferry in 1850, the first store and bridge i.a 1862, the first
house in 1866, a:nd the 6.rst posl oft%ce i.n. l. 867: • Al.l of these "frsts" occurred before the
arrival in 1873 nf James Glover who was consiciereti thd "Fal:her of Spokane."
In 1883, the Northein Pacific Railioad openeci the west up with the transconli.nental railroad. The new riulroad, coupled with- the discovery of silver iii ciorth Ida.ho, created - - ,
_an iniltix of geople to.the Spokane Va.lley area. Withi.n a few years the Spokane area was .
connected to the rest af the country by five transconti.nental railroads. The next major iiinovation to Spokanc Vallcy was the introduction of irrigation to the
.
area. Within 20 yeazs 30,000 aeres of dry land had been converted into fertile farm land.
1'he first irrigation systems were constructed betvveen 1899 and 1905. The Valley
populatiori grew f,rom I,OQO'residenfs at the turn of the century to nearly 10,000 by 1922.
During this tinie apple gro,~~ became the pred'ominant agricultural crop Nvith nea.rly 2
. rx►iUion apple trees bei,ng planted by 1912. As the population of the Valley increased,
sinall communities-with churches, schonls, businesses, community clubs, and oth.er .
organizations thrived.
Prior to Wor.ld War U., the federal govern.ment made a decision to build an alumi.num ,
plant in Spokane Valley along the Spokane River. Additionally, the federal governuient
. 74 .
iden.tified a need for warehouse space aud (acilities ta support coastal activities dixri.ng the
war. In 1942, Spokane Valley was chosen as a site for one of tiheses Tnland Supply ` - l
Depots. T'he Naval Storage Yards are now the Valley Cndustrial Park that lla._ 5,000,000
squtu'e fect of gross leasablc floor area. .
lZapid growth continued in Spokane Valley throughout the 1950s, 60s, aud 70s. A.long . .
with this continued grow-th aame cancer.ns regarding the im.pact of the development on
- the Valley enviroument. Citizens' concerns were related to impacts to lakes in the area as well as the aquifer underlying a majority of the Spokane Valley. No pr.ptections were put
int.o place to address these issues; sanitary sewers were not required for new construction. -
StEady residential aad eouimercial growth cantinueci in the Spokane Valley throughout
the 80s and 90s. High tech companies followed Hewletf Packard into the Liberly L.akc area. Z.ater, some high tech c;ompanies moved into the Industrial Park. The State Board
of. ITealth threatencd to enact a moratorium on. ncw development in 1983, uziless sewering
of the Va.l.ley began. ra response, Spokane County developed a wastewater management
plari that pui into motion canstruction of a sewer trunk line and a sanitary sewer system
was made available to the citizens of Spokane Val.ley. .
MAJOR PI)-BLIG FACTI..1'TICS A'1VT) PAItKS IN SPOKtiNE VALLEY There are public facilities and a numbcr of parks in the City of Spokane Valley. The
Spokane Yndians, a minor league baseball team, plays its home games at Avista Stadium, . locatcd just inside the city limits on the east side af Havana Street. Th.is sfadium is one of
the finest facilitics in the Northwest League and can seat 7,200 speetators. Situated next
ci4or tn ANista Stadium is the Spokane County Fair and Exposition Center. Thc
Fairgrounds was expanded in 2003 with the construction of a ncw covered grandstand
that was opeued at ttie 2003 Interstate Fair. Various other shows and evcnts are held
throughout the year at-the Fairg'ounds. •
Mirabeau k'oint Park, situated on 54.5 acres of land, located betwcen Pincs Road and _ rvergreen Road interchanges (north of I-90), along the south bank oI'thc Spokane River,
is the home oF Cent•erPlace. ' .
CenterPlace, a 54,000 square foot facility, was built to ac;comm.ociate a regional senior
center, cducation and busi.ness center, and a cultural aad performing art_s center.
1Vlirabeau Meadows is a 15-acre parcel of: land providing another azea for community
activities, such as family get-togethers and games, outdoor music, corpor.ale outings,
fazmcrs markets, arts and crafts, and other special events iu Mirabeau Point Park.
Valleyfest, an an.uual couimunity event that is sponsored by individuals and busincsses in
ouz City, was helci in this park in 2004. .
The City of Spokanc Valley operates a numbez of parks writhin the City. Below is a . sutnmary of thesc parks:
. ..1
75
Park Name Park Classification Park Size _
Balf.our Community Park 2.8 acr.es
. ' Brown's Conwiuaity Park 8.2 acrzs Castle Conuuunity Park 2.7 acres '
Ed ecliff Community Park 4.8 acres .
Mirabeau Poi.nt Park Community/Re 'onal Park 54.5 acre.s -
lVI' e Poi.nt Natural Area 31.0 acres
Park Roaci Ponl . Secial Use 2.0 acres Sull.ivan Communi Park 10.3 acres
Terrace View Communi Pazb 9.1 acres
- Valley Mission and Val.ley Community Park 27.2 acres _
Mission Soulh & Pool
Valley Senior Center S ecial Usc 2.0 acres
Centennixl Trail '1"rail - 7linear miles
THF FUTURE OF SPOKANE VAI.fI,EY
Spolrane Yalley: a community of opportzinity where individuals and families can grow
' and plaand btasiness will flourislr and prosper. ~
' The potential of Spokane Valley is tremendous, with an adcqu'ate taY base and room for
expansion af residential, commereial, and induskrial gzawth. Sgnkane Val.ley zivals 4fher
cities in Ea.stern Washington in terms of populatio.n and siguficance in the regon. The City is comuutted to plfuiriing for the future. Tt has created a rough draft o£ its first
Comprehcnsive Plan,,which is undergping wmmunity review. Tn addition, the City is.
developing a Parks and Rcemation Master Plan. •
76
I
/
Appendix A
~
EMPLOYEE POSITION CLASSIFICATION
MONTHLY SALARY SCHEDULE '
2006 Salary Schedule
Position Titte Giade 2006 Range
Ci Mana er Unclassified
De u Ci Mana er 21 $ 7 020 9,000
Ci Attorne 21 7020 - 9,000
Communi Develo ment Director 21 7,020 - 9,000
Finance Director ` 21 7 020 - 9,000
' Public Worics Director 21 7,020 - 9,000
Parks and Recreation Director 19 5,686 - 7,290
Ci En ineer 19 5,686 - 7,290
Plannin Mana er 18 5,118 - 6.561
Buildin Official 18 5,11 8 6,561
Senior En inee~ - Ca ital Pro'ects Develo ment 18 5,118 - 6,561
Senior En ineer - Traffic Clf' Plannin /Grants 17 4606 - 5,905
De u Ci Attorne 16 4,145 - 5,314
Ci Clerk 16 4 145 - 5,314
En ineer • 16 4145 - 5,314
Senior Planner 16 4,145, 5,314
Acoountin Mana er 16 4 145 5j314 Seniar Plans Examiner 16 4.145 - 5,314 .
fT S ecialist 15 3 731:, - 4,783
. Associate Planner. 15 31731 - 4,783 Assistant En inee[ 15 .31731 - 4,783
~
Public Works Su erintendent ' 15 3 731 - 4,783
CenterPlace Coordinator 15 3,731 - 4,783
Human Resource Anal st 14 3 358', - 4,305
AccountanUBud et Anal st 14 3 358 4,305
Administrative Anal st 14 . 3,358 - 4,305
, Assistant Planner 14 3,358 4,305
'
Buildin Ins ector 11 . 14 3,358 4,305
Flans Examiner 14 3358 - 4,305
GIS Technician 14 3 358 - 4,305
Public lnformation Officer ' 14 3 358 - 4,305
' En ineerin Technician 14 3.358 - 4,305
Senior Permit S ecialist 14 3 358 - 4,305
MaintenancelConstruction Ins ector 13-14 3 022 - 4,305
Recreatiori Coordinator 13-14 3,022 - 4,305
Code Enforcement Officer 13 3,022 - 3,874
Buildin Ins ector I 13 3,022 - 3,874
Plannin Technician 13 3,022 - 3,874
' De u Ci Cleric 12-13 2,720 - 3,874
Senior Center S ecialist 12-13 2.720 - 3,874
.
Administrative Assistant 11-12 2,448 - 3,487
. Permit S ecialist 11-12 2,448 - 3,487
. Accountin Technician 11-12 2,448 - 3,487
Maintenance Worker 11-12 2,448 - 3 4$7-
Office Assistant II 10-11 2,203 - 3,138 ~
Office Assistant I 9-10 1,983 - 2,824
.
Recreation Assistant 5 1 301 - 1,668
,
. 77
!
Appendix B
OUTSTANDING GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE
Total
Year Principal Interest Requirements
2006 $ 175,000 $ 414,535 $ 589,535
2007 185,000 411,035 596,035
2008 190,000 406,872 596,872 2009 - 205,000 401,173 606,173'
. 2010-2014 1,200,000 1,885,112 .3,085,112
2015-2019 1,655,000 1,612,068 . 3,267,068.
2020-2024 2,480,000 1,135,250 3,6150250 2025-2029 2,090,000 519,250 2,609,250
2030-2033 940,000 112,500 1,052,500 `
' $ 9,120,000 $ :6,897,79.5 $'.16,017,795
, . _ . .
. . .
. . . 3:-
. , - .
, .
f . .
. ,
7s
i , . .
CITY OF SPQKEINF VAI,LEY ,
Glossxry of Budgct Terms
Accraal Basis - A ba.sis of accounting Capital Improvement - Espendihuzs
in which -revenues and expcnditures are related to aequisition, . expansion or -
recorded at the tYme they occur . as rehabilitation of an elcment of the
apposed to Nvhen cash is actual,ly government's physical plant; sometimes
nceivcd or spent. rePerred to as infrastructure.
ApprapriRtion - A legal authorization Capitsl Outlay -FiYed a.ssets that have .
granted by the Ci.ty Counci.l to mal:e general value of $5,000 . or more and
expenditures and to incuz obligations for have a useful economic li.fetime of more
a specific purpose. ' . than one year. Assessed Valualion - Thc valuati4n set . Capital Project -Major construction,
. upon real estale and certain personal acquisition, or renovation activities
property by t6.e County Assessor a..~ a which add value to govemment's
basis f.or levying property taxes. physical assets or si.gn,ificantly increase
. their useful lifc, als4 called capital
Authorized Positions - Employee improvements. .
positions, which are authorized in the .
adopteci budget, to be filled during the Capital Projects Fund - A fund cnaLeri
year. to account for a.lJ resources xud
, expenditures used for the acquisition of
13ond - A long-term promise to repay a ixed assets except those financeci by
specified amount (the face amount of the enterprise funds.
bond) on a partieular date (the maturity
date). The most common types of bonds Contingency - A budgetary reserve set
are genezal obligation revenue bonds. aside for emergencies or unforeseen
Bunds are pCimarily used to f.tnauce expenditures not otlierwise budgelcd.
capital projects.
Canl'ractual Services - Serviccs .
Buclget - A plan of financial activity for rendered to a government by private
a specified period of ti.me (fiscal year or firins, individuaJs, or other gdvernmental
biennium) indicating all planned agenci.es.
revenues and espenses for tlie budget period. llebt Service - Payment o.f interest and
principal on borrowed money according
13udget 11'Icssage -1fie opeuing sECtion to a predetermin.ed payment schedule.
of the budget that provides ttie City
Council and the public with a gcneral Deparrment -Thc basit: unit of service
swrunary of the most important aspects responsibil.ity, encompassing a broaci
of the budget, changes f.rom the currcnt mandate of related servic;e
and previous years, and the views auci respAnsibilities. - recom.mendations of the Mayor.
, 79
l ~ .
' llivision - Can be a subunit o£ a that ciefine dccepted accoundng
deparh.nent which eucompd.sses a principles. ,
substantial portion of the duties assigned ,
to a department (e.g. Building Division GASB -'T'he Governmental Accounting
iti the Planning and Commuaity Standarcis Board, established in 1985, is
. Development Departrnent). the current standard-setting board for
governmental GAAl'.
Encumbrance = The. commitment of
appropriated funds to purchase an iteui General Faad - Thc principal dperati.ng
oc sezvice. To cncumber funds means ta fund of the City -used' fvr general
set aside or commit fu,nds for a spec;iCed governmental operations. Taxes and
fuhue expenditure. fecs that generally have no restriction on
. their'use support it
. -Expense - Cbarges incurred (whether paid immediately or unpaid) for General Obligution (G.O.) Bonds -
operations, maintenance, interest or This tiype Uf band is backed by the full
other charges: faith, crecii.t and taxing poNver of the
. goverament issuing it.
Face Valuc - The aznount of principal
lhat must be paid at maturity for a bond indirect Cost - A cost necessary for the issue. functioning of the organization as a
• whole, but which cannot be -ideniified
~ Fiscat Year - A twelve-month period with a sPecifie product, fu.nction or
designated as the oFerating year for activify.
.
. accowiti.ng and budgeting purpQSes in an '
organizatiou. • Infrastructure - The phy5ical assets o£
- • a gover.nment (e.g. strcets, water, sewer, Full-timc Equivalcnt Posidon (F"I`E) publ.ic bui.ldings, and parks).
A full-time pr part-tune position '
converted to the cieci.mal equivalent of a Interfund' T,-ansfers -The movement
fiall-time position based on 2,080 hours of- monies between funds of the same
per year. Fpr example, a part-time governmental entity.
person working 20 Fiours per -vveck •
would be eqtuvalent of OS of: a f.ul.l-time Leiy - To impsse taxes f.or the suppoit
position. . of the governmental activities.,
Fund -A tiseal entity w-i.th revenues and Lang-term Acbt = llebt Nvitti a maturity .
expenses that are segre;ated for the aF inare than orie yeae a,fter the datc of
purpose of carrying out a specific issuance. purpose oz activity.. Mission. Stxtement - A broad statement
GAA.P - Geuerally Accepted of the intended accomplishment or basic
ACCOUIltlrig Principles. Uniform purposc of a progzam. ~ minixnum standards for financial
accounti.ng and reeording, encompassing i'Nodificd Accrual Accounting - F1
the conventions, rules, anci procedures basis of aeeaunting in wtucli ,
80
expenditures are accrued but_ revenues ..R.evenue - Sou.rces of i.ncome financing
are . accnunted for when they become the opera.tions of govern.ment.
measurable and available. Since this
type of accounting basis is a Taxe.ti - Compulsory cha.rges levied by a
conservative fu►aricial approach, it is govcrnment for the purpose of financing
recominended as the stanciard for most , services performed for ttie eocnmon ' -
govemruental funds. benef t. 'Mis term does not i,nclude
specifie charges made against particular
• Operating Budget -The porti.an of the persons or property for cuzrent or
' budget that per.tdins 'to daily operafions pernianent benefits such as special
that provide basic governmental ' assessments. Neither does the term
• services. . -i.nclude charges for services rendered
. : . only to thnse who pay, for example,
Ordinsnce -A formal legislatyve sewer service charges.
enactrv:ent by the City Cnuncil. 'If il- is
not in conflict with, any higher form af Unreserved Funci Balance - The
l.aw, such as a statute or constitutional . porlYOn of a fiind's balance that is not
pravision, it has the full force and effect restrictcci Enr a specire purpase and is of law within the boundaries of the available for general appropriaiion. -
mun.icipality to which it applies.
. , . . User. Charges - The paymcut of a fee'
-Prugram -"1 he smallest organizaiion for d'uect receipt of a public service by
that delivers a specific set of serviees. A the party wha benefits From tbe service.
program may be an eutire department; or
if a . dcpartment encampas5es Vision Statement - A short statemeut 'signifcantly diverse responsibilities oz that conveys the big picture of the
large' "Arork f'orces, a single departcnent organizatian. It is general in scope, not ,
may be clivided into two or more restricting. , It answers the question
pr4grams. "why?„ .
' Rescrve - A.n accaunt used to citlier,set aside budgeted revenues that are not ,
requireci for exPendihue in tlie current
budget year or tn earmark reveuues for a
specific futurc purpose. '
Resolution - A special or teinporary - _ •
, order of a legislative body-an order of
a lcgislative body requiring less legal ' .
forniality than au ordinance or stahrte. _
Resources - 7"otal amounts available for
appropria.ti.on ineluding estunated . revrenues, fund transfers, and beginning
balances.
' . . ~
. 81
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
~-Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: NOVEMBER 15, 2005 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent 0 old business X new business public hearing
❑ admin. repart X pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Proposed Ordinance 05-030 Excess 2006 Property Tax Levy
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: State budget law
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: The 2006 proposed revenues were presented to the ,
City Council on August 9, as an informational item. A public hearing was held on August 23, to
discuss projected revenues including changes in property taxes. The public was invited to offer
comment at the August 23, hearing.
Additional public hearings were held on September 27, and October 11, to consider the entire
2006 proposed budget including property tax revenues.. -
BACKGROUND: State budget law requires we make our revenue projections known and
conduct a public hearing to consider input from the public. At the public hearing on August 23,
special mention was made of property taxes.
The City is required to pass an ordinance expressing our desire to levy the 1% annual increase
. in the property tax levy. The proposed ordinance is attached. .
We find ourselves in an unusual situation in that our total property- tax levy will decrease by
approximately $1,500,000 (library no longer in our levy) but we still have the requirement to
document our desire to levy the 1% increase. We have met this requirement by noting that our
levy includes the 1% ($95,450) allowable increase under state law. OPTIONS: State law requires an ordinance be passed confirming our desire to levy the annual
1% allowable increase in property tax. A second option would be for the council to decide not to
pass the ordinance and reduce the 2006 budget by $95,450.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: A motion to advance ordinance 05-030 to a second .
reading on November 29, is recommended.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The city will receive an increase of $95,450 (1%) in property
tax dollars in 2006 if this ordinance is passed.
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Thompson, Finance Director
CITY OF SPOKA.]VF VALLFX
SPnKANE CUUNTY WAS.MNGT'QN
OFt:I:).I1vriNCE NU. 05-030
Av ORDNANCE QF 11fE CTTY OF SPOICA~\`~ VAl1LEY, WASHL\*GTON,
CONI+IRiNLING 'I'H;F CITY T'17OPERTfY TAX LEVY AT 1"/0 (S95,450) IN EXCF.SS OF
TH:E 2004 AD VATdOREM PRpPE12TY TAlY LEVY WHICH WAS COL-LECTFn fiV
TkTF CITY 2005 FISCAL YFAR, PURSIJAt\7T TU RC`V 84.55.120, PROVIDLNG FOIt
SEVF...RrV31LITY, ANU AN TFFFCI'lVE DATE
Wf-(ERrAS, State law authorizes the Ciiy of Spokane Valley to levy reoular property taxes upon
the eaxable propcrCy within tlie City limits in order to provide revenue for the annual Current Expense
Budget of the City;
WEEREAS, Initiative 747 (RCVV Chapter 34.55) providetl that cities wilh a population of over
10,000 persons can incrcase the amount of their regular property [a.aes a»nually by the lesser amount of
iiiflation or 1% of the highest levy, plus any additiontil value resultinb &om new construction, .
. improvements and state assessed property; ,
NVI-LEREAS, State law protects fuhire levry capacity to Che extent the full a.mount of the atf
valorem prqnerty tax audlori7xd by law has not been levied (ie. "increased Capacity");
WHEREAS, Co increase the amoLmt of property taxes by moee than 1% in any given year, the
City's property tax. rale; must have bcen below the Maxirnum amount aukhorized by law (S`Inereased ~
~ Capacity'
\NrHFREAS, an increa,se in property tax revenue may be auChorized by the City lhrough adoption
of a sepsrate orcimance, pursuanl to notice; speei .fically authorizirig the increase stated in terms of dollars
and percentage.
. NOW TFEREFOItE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, VJa.shingtan, do ordain as
fol lows: . Section 1. Pur ose. The purpose of tllis Ordinance is to uCilize excess levy capacity of'the
City (the lncreascd Capacity) that resulted fi-om the ttix Icvy in 2004 for the 2005 fiscal year. SCa[e law
authori7es the City to increase its property taxes by an amount of 1% above the highest la-*vful allowable
levy in a prececling year (excepling new construction, improvemcnts and assessment of State owned
property). 1'he tax.es received from the increased levy set forth herein tind the regular propei-ty tax levied '
tFiroug Ordinance 05-027 are appropriaCed in the 2006 City Budget, adoptecl througti Ordinance 05-029.
Section 2. Findim:
A. The City, f'ollowing public hearings, adopted a balanced Current Expense ]3udget that
sets forth citizen prioritics and promotes the health, welfare and safety of the City.
B. The City published notice of this Ordinancc through the procedure usccl 'to notify the
public of regular Council meetings.
. i C. 7'o support the adonted Cunent Expense Budget of the City and provicle for the delivery
of services, the making of improvcments and the promotinn of the health, welf'are and
safety of the citizens, the City Council, after considering the ftna.ncial requirements of
Qrdiruunce 05-030 Additional PropTax Page 1 of 2
the City for 2006, finds ind determines that there is substantial need to includc the 1% incrense ($95,450) allowed by State law, in the ad valnrem property tax of $$,056,000
whieh was adopted by a majority plus one of the City Council on November 15, 2005
dh.rougM Ordinance 05-027.
Section 3. 1% Increase. Pursuant to RC1W 84.55, the City, by adopting Ordinance 05-
027, imposed a❑ increase in the regular property twx levy (in addition to the increase resulting from the
addition of new construction, improvements and the increascd value of State assesscd nroperty), in the
amount of $95,450 which is a percentage inceease of 1% from the 2004 Ad Valnrem Property Tax Levy,
which was collectcd in the City 2005 Fiscal Year.
Section 4. City Clerk. The City Clerk shall certify 3 copy of this Ordinance and fomard
the same• ro the Board of Cotmty Commissioners and the Spokane County Assessors Office upan iCs
passage.
Seetion S. Severabi(itv. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this qrdinance should
be held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such clecision shall not afCect the validity or constitutionaliry of
1ny other section, sentence, c(ause, or phrase of this ordinance.
Section 6. Effective. DaCe. This ordinance shall be in full force ancl effcct five (5) days after
publication of this ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City as provided by
law. Passed by the City Council this day of , 2005.
-
Mayor, Diana Wilhite
AT1 F-S"I':
Christine F3ainbridge, City Clerk .
Approvea a.s to Form: .
Office of the City Attorney '
Date of I'ublication:
Effective Date:
/
Ordinancc 05-030 Additional YropTiti PagC 2 uf2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: November 15, 2005 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business 0 new business ❑ public hearing
. ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First Reading Proposed Ordinance 05-031 Amending SVMC
3.40.050H Competitive Bidding
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 3.40.050H; RCW 8.26, Uniforrn Relocation Assistance
and Real Property Acquisition Act •
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Previous informational memos and briefings on
contractual agreements with Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT)
authorizing WSDOT to act on City behalf for purchases of real property related to road projects
utilizing federal funds. • - '
BACKGROUND: The City utilizes DOT's services in various ways in relation to road projects. Staff
has provided the Council vrith information and proposed agreements with WSDOT whereby WSDOT
would represent the City's interests in acquiring real property for road construction projects that
utilize federal funds. An example would be the reconstruction of Appleway east of Sullivan that is
coming up in 2006. VIlSDOT has the expertise and personnel to handle such transactions on behalf
of the City.
_ When these types of construction projects occur, it is often necessary to acquire small pieces of real
property from adjoining private property owners. Sometimes, it is necessary to pay above fair
-%market value, depending on the circumstances. RCW 8.26 and WAC 468-100 are required by the
Federal Highway Administration for the purchase of real property associated with federally funded
road projects. These laws provide protection and oversight to ensure that any transactions for real . property in excess of fair market value by the WSDOT on behalf of the City, would only be done
under appropriate conditivns.
If the City were handling this project, we have a mechanism in place where the Council would review
any such purchase above fair marfcet value, and that is required by SVMC 3.40.0501-i. That
provision is the only mechanism for purchasing real property above fair market value. If the City
wants to contract with WSDOT to provide these services, the City will need to amend - SVMC
3.40.050H. 7he proposed amendment provided in the attached draft ordinance would allow the City
to sign the agreements with UVSDOT, and still provide an appropriate mechanism to ensure that if
the City is paying more than fair marlcet value, it is being done under provisions adopted by state law
under RCW 8.26.
OPTIONS: (1) Move to advance to a second reading; (2) Suspend rules and approve the
ordinance; (3) provide further instructions
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move that we suspend the rules and approve
Ordinance 05-031 as written.
~-'STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten, Public Works Director; Steve Worley, Senior Engineer, Cary
Driskell, Deputy City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Ordinance 05-031
~
~
DRAFT
CtTV Ok' SYOi:n.NE VALLrY
SPOK,ANIE COIJNTX, VVASIUNGTUN
URDINANCE NQ. 05-031
AN ORD[NANCE UF THE C[TX OF SPUKANE VALT,EY, SPOKA\TE COUNTY,
WA.SHIlVGTC)N, ANrENDING T1r1E R.FQUllZEME\''TS FOR CQMPETITIVF B117DlNG
• YRUCESS YURSUAN'1 TO SVNtC 3.40.050(M, 1'ROVI.[)1NG NOR SEVE,1tABTLTTY,
AiNTll EFFECTIVE DATF.
W1-TFREAS, the City Council adopted SVMC 3.40.050 Ju1y 22, 2003, establishing 5uidelines for
purchasing real property; amd .
. VfFIEREAS, one of the requiremcnts in SVMC 3.40.050 is subsection H, which requires, in part,
khat any purchase of real property be done at fair market value, unless dhe City Council gives prior
approval; and
VdHEREAS, the City utilizes the services of the Wash.ington State Deparlment of Transporration
(`VSDO"I~ for various aspects of roacl construction projeets; and
' WI WRrAS, one of the services the Ciry would use the WS1aOT for is to purchase real property
on behalE of the City for road projects utilizing federal funds; and
1WNEREAS, the process used by the WSTaOT ta purcha.se real prnperty _for roacl prnjects,
including purchases in escess of fair market valuc, is specifically preseribed by the provisions RCW 8.26
and WAC 468-100; and
WI-rrREAs, the provisions of RCW 8.26 and WAC 468-100 are i-equircd by the Federal
I-tighway Administration for the purchase of real property associttted with fedcrally funded road projects;
an (i
NVH:ERC:AS, the provisions of RCW 8.26 3nd WAC 468400 provide sufficienl protection and
oversight to cnsure that any transactions for rcal property in cxccss of fair rnarket value by the WSD07"
on behalf of the City woulcl only be done uncler appropristc eonditions.
NOVV, THFRE1'ORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Mashington, orclains as. .
follows:
Sectiou 1. Purpose. 'I'he purpase of this Ordinance is to amend Spokane Valley Muiiicipal
Code section 3.40.050(I-1) to allow an alternative exception for paying above fair market value for real
property in conjunction with a road conslrucCion projeet.
. Section 2. Amendment to SVMC 3.40A50(I4). Spoka.ne Valley Municipal Cocle Section
3.40.050(I-1) shall be amended Co read as follows: .
H. Real Property. Acquisilion of real property is exempt from the competitive bidding
I requirements sEC forth in ihis chapter. Updn approval oE the city council, the city manager or
desianee rnay proceed to acquire real property through negotiation. Such negotiations shall be
bascd upon a f'air market valuc appraisal of the property. The Gity shal] not pay more Chan fair
market value for itny real property ex, cept witheut prior city council approval, or exeent aA s!t~aY
be apRroved bv the Washington Depart»eiit of Transportation on behall' of the City for road
cOnstructiori profects.
$ection 3. The remainder of SVMC section 4.30.050 shall retnain unchanged by this action. ~
Ordinsnce 05-031 Amending SNriviC 3.40.050(E) Nge I of Z
I
1
DRAl^'C
Sectinn 4. Severabilitv. Lf any section, sentence, elause or phrase of this Orclinance should
be held to be invalid or uncnnstittitional by a court of eompetent jurisdiction, sueh invalidity or
unconsl;itutionalily shall not atT'ect thc validity or constitutionality of any other sectiori, sentcnce, clause or
phrase of this Ordinanee.
Section 5. tfleetivc laate.. This Ordinance shall be in fi.ill force and effect f ve (5) days after
. thc date of publication of Chis Ordinance or a summary I:hereof in the official newspaper of the City.
PASSED by the City Council this day of , 2005.
Mayor, Diana Wilhitc
A I'TEST:
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
Approved As To Form:
OFfiae ofi the City Attoniey ,
Date of Publication:
Effeetive Dat:e: -
Ordinanr.e 05-031 Arnertcling SVMC 3_40.050(14) Page 2 of 2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: November 15, 2005 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business X new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legisfation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Resolution 05-025 accepting Right-of-Way dedication deed for Wabash
Road
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None
BACKGROUND: The City does not yet have a formalized process for accepting dedication of
real property for road purposes if the property to be dedicated is outside of the boundaries of a
final plat. Staff is working on a draft ordinance and procedures to provide such a process, but in
the inean time, this matter needs to be addressed for the finalization of a development. Since
the Council has not delegated this authority to staff, it must come before the Council for aciion.
t~ The only issue before the Council on this is whether to accep4 this property for road purposes.
Developer Ken Tupper is developing land in the Greenacres area of the City. In order to get his
project approved, he needed to secure property outside the boundaries of his project to ensure
that road needs were being addressed. The solution was to arrange through contractual means
with the Hobbs family to dedicate certain property to the City for ROW purposes that is adjacent
to the project. This would open a new stretch of Wabash Road.
OPTIONS: Accept the dedication
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: "I move to approve Resolution 05-025 accepting the
dedication of the real property identified in the attached Right-of-Way Deed, and authorize the
City Manager or designee to execute any document necessary for the transfer."
BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT:
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution accepting the Right-of-Way Deed
2. Attachment to Resolution, Right-of-Way Deed
Draft
CITY OF SPOKANE Vt1LLEY - r SP()I{A.s\°E COUNTY, WASNiNGTON , i
1ZESOLLTTiQN \'Q. 05-025 . .
A RESOY.UTIUN OF '1.'FIE CITY OF SPOKIINE VAY,LFY, SPnKANF CO[JiNTY,
WASFI[INGTON, ACCLPTLNG THL CONVEYAICE Ql+ r1 RIGHT-QF-WAY DEED
F1tOM 1ROY G. HOBBS AND 17ENTSL R. HOBBS FOR PUliLIC STltEFT
I'URFOSES. W'HERF.4S, Troy G. F-iobbs and Denisc R. Hobbs are dcsirous of granting to the Cityo uf Spokane
Valley Right-of-Way Dced for that property idcntified in Exhibit A, attached hcreto and incorporated
herein by reference; ancl
W*l-IER.rAS, the subject proper.ty idenCified in Ex}aibit A rnust neccssarily be dedicated to the
City as a requirement before a final plat inay be issued for peoperey irnmediately adjoining to the north of
this property; and -
WHERF.AS, it is in the besC interest of the City to have the ability to extend mads into those
areas where jrowth is anticipated.
\'OM TFiER.EFORE; bc it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane
County, Washington, as follows: 'I'he City of Spokane Valley accepts from Troy G. Hobbs and Denise R. Hohbs the Right-of-Way
Deed f'or the conveyance of the property identified in Fxhibit A, witli the intent ta use the same for the `
pttblie benefit as a public road. The City agrees to use the property consistent: with cnnditions, if any, impnsed upon the property
through the grant of any previous easements. The City Council heeeby aeccnts the gmit of Riaht-of-Way
Deed, and aiithorizes the City lvfanager to execute a11 riecessary documents to complete the conveyance
of the Deed, i.ncluding final acceptance of the Deed frce aiid clear of liens and encumbrances that affect
the City's ceasonable use of Ct►e properey. _ Adopced this day of November, 2005. City of Spokane VaIIeY .
Vlayor Diana Wilhite
ATTF S'1:
Cify Clerk, Christine Bainbridge
Approve:d ss to Borm:
.
Office of the City Attorney
• Resoluli0ri 05-025. Re Hobbs Streel Dedication Page 1 of 1
After Recording Iteturn To:
Spol:xne Valley Public VVorks laePt.
Attn: Right of Way llepartment
11707 E. Sprague, Suite 100 .
Spokane Valley, VVA 99246
Documcnt Tide: Right of Way Detd
Grantor(s): Troy G. Hobbs and Denise R. I•Iobbs, husbancl snd wife
Grantee: Government, City of Spokane Valley
Lcgal Description: Ptn Tract 114 Plan No. 4West Farms Irrigated Tracts
Assessnr's Tax Parcel h~umber(s): Portian of Parcel No. 46353.0609
Reference Number.
Log in Date: Requesced by: Prepared by:
Purpose: RF No(s).: Road Name(s): VVabash avenue
SPpKA,NF, VALLEY PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. ' Spokane Valley, Washington
RIGHT QF WAY UE
IN TIIE MATTER OF RF NO•
IiNOW ALL eV(.EN BY 7'BESE 1'RESENTS, that the Grantor(s) ROY G. HOBBS and DENTSE
R. HOBBS, husband and wife,
For anci in cansideration of iVlutual Bcnefits, grants and conveys to Spokane Valley, the
- following described parcel of land, situaCed in the City of Spokane Valley, the County of
Spokane, and the State of Washington, to-wit:
The North 19.00 f.eet of the East 150.13 feet of Tract 114 of Plat No. 4 of NVFST Ft1R~IS
JRRIGATE17 TRACTS as per Plat thereof recorded in Volume "O" of Plats, Page 51,
together with the North 19.00 feet of that portion of the unnamed Right of Way as
depicted on Plat Nlo. 4 of WEST FARMS IRRTGATFD TRACT'S, as recorded in Volume
"O" oE Plats, page 51, lying adjacent to anci Easterly of Tract 11.4 of said Plat, and as
vacated by Spokane County Commissioners Resolution No. 85 0299, dated April 16,
1985.
Situate in the City of Spokane Valley, State of Washington.
AFFEC.['S PORTIOl\T OF ASSESSORS PFIRCEL NO(S).: 45353.0609 '
.
~ l
` ~ 1..... Right of Way Deed
TO HA'V'E A.ND TO HOLD the same, unto the said Spokane Valley for the purposes of a public
road forever. TN `VZ'Tl\'ESS WREItEpF, the undersigncd has caused this instrument to be executed on this
~day of October, 2005.
/
,
/ G. H
~
DENrsE R. xoBBs
STATE OF WASHTNGTON )
ss.
COUVTY OF SPOKANE ) I certify that I know or havE satisfactory evidcnce that TROY G. HOBBS and DEIVISE
R. HOBBS are the persons who appeared before me, and said persons acknowledged that they
signed this instrument and acknowledged il to bE their fir,e and voluntary act for thc uses and
purposes mentioned in the instrument.
Dated: Octobcr 2005.
, -
F~~ Nol y Public in and for the State of
~J~Q`SS4~~,~r!1-~ Washington, resicling at S1654I-7
My appointment ex ires: ~?oTAR'r P
e ^t~_
_ P~J?LIC
R 2C n~f ~
~ •
~G= :yA~1
2..... Right of Way beed
. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
~Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: November 15, 2005 City Manager Sign-off:
(tem: Check all that apply: ❑ consent X old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
[l information ❑ admin_ report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration - Spokane Valley Appeal number APP 02-05,
Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Decision
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: The Council previously conducted a closed record
hearing, and on October 25, 2005 instructed staff to draft a Findings, Conclusion and Decision
remanding this matter back to the Hearing Examiner.
BACKGROUND: In November, 2004, Whipple Consulting Engineers submitted applications for
rezone of 4.6 acres of property located in the general vicinity of Barker and 4th Avenue in
eastem Spokane Valley from the existing UR 3.5 to UR7". The application also sought to
subdivide the property, into 21 lots with a PUD overlay zone. The Hearing Examiner (HE)
approved the rezone, but denied the preliminary plat and PUD overlay. The basis for denying
the preliminary plat and PUD was that the proposed plan failed to comply with a provision of the
PUD ordinance requiring all PUDs to have ingress/egress onto an arterial or collector, as
identified in the City's Interim Comprehensive Plan. .
Following the issuance of the HE's decision on March 24, 2005, Whipple, represented by
attorney Meg Arpin, appealed the denial of the preliminary plat and PUD. No final action has
been taken with respect to Whipple's appeal. Two neighboring property owners, Tom and
Kathy Tabbert, and Stephen and Barbara Hormel, appealed the decision to grant the rezone
from UR 3.5 to UR7"'. That appeal was designated APP 01-05, and has already been resolved
by the Council. That decision by the Council was then appealed to Spokane County Superior
Court, and is pending before the Court. .
On October 18, 2005, the Council adopted Ordinance 05-026 amending the PUD regulations by
removing a requirement that all PUDs must access onto a collector or arterial road. Based on
that change, the Council iristructed the staff to draft a Findings; Conclusions and Decision
remanding this matter back to the HE for further consideration.
OPTIONS: (1) Approve draft Findings, Conclusions and Decision remanding the application
back to the HE with instructions to reconsider the mafter. (2) Instruct staff to make revisions to
the draft Findings, Conclusions and Decision .
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: "I move that we approve the proposed Findings,
Conclusions and Decision remanding the preliminary plat application back to the HE with
instructions to reconsider the matter."
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT: Cary P. Driskell, Deputy City Attorney
i
ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Findings, Conclusions and Decision
~
INI TtE: SYOKANF VA1.LEYAPPEAL N[JM$ER )
APF-02-05; APFELL,AN'1'S S'1"EPHFN t-IORMEL, ) F1NllINGS QF FACT,
13ARBAR.A 1=IORMLL; TOM TABI3FRT AND ) CONCLLJST0NS OF T.AW, '
K,ATIIY lAB13LR"1"; ARIS1-NIG FROVt FTf F NO. ) AND DECISION OF
REZ-25-04/SU]3-16-04/Pi.1D-06-04 ) THE SPOK.ANE VALLE-Y
) CITY COUNCIL
)C. PARTIUS
~ l. The Applicant ancl Appellmit on the proposed land use action is `Vhipple
~ Consultuip- Lngineers, inc., (hereafter "Whipple"). The APplicandAppellazit is
representecl by attomey Meg Arpin of Arpin i aw Offices.
2. Parties of interest cappUSed to tlie appeal arc Kathy w-id Tom Tabbert, and
Barba-a and Ste_phen Hormcl (hereaf•i:er "interested Neig,hbors").
il: FINDINCS nF FAC"1'
. 1. The City Coiuicil hereby adopts by reference, as if fully set fnrth herein,
Findings of FACt one tlu-ough se•venty-five (1-75) aciopled by the City Iiearing Examiner
in this matter an Niarch 24, 2005.
2. The City Council hcreby aciopt.S by reference, as if fully set forth hereui,
the record certifieci hy the City Hcaring Exantiner in this matter. 3. The Parties stipulatcd to comply with tbe draft amendments to Spokanc
Valley Municipal Cade 10.35.150, the proceciural niles for appeals of zoiung matters
Crom the City I-Iearing E:xaminer to the City Council. These draff rules were
subsequently aclopted by thE City Council on July 1, 2005.
4. `!'he City Council held a closed record hearing on the City Hearing
Fxaminer's clecision in this malter on June 14, 2005.
CI'I'X COUNCI_I, FIT'DI\'GS/ •
- I -
CONCLUSIUNSfDr CtStON A.PP-02-05
5. "1'here were no additional facts that were successCully tnade part of the recorci on appeal to tlle City Council.
6. Based upon the record presented, and the ordinances in place to June 14;
2005, the Cit}= Couneil orally mo<<ed to deny the appeal, and requested staff tu drai't a
Findi.ngs, Conclusions and laecision consistent with ihat oral motion. 7. Prior to adopting any Findings, Conclusion and Decision tern-iinating lhis
appcal; additional discussions by the City Council resultcd in a reevaluation of the
Planned Urut Developinent regulatioi-is for the City.
J3a..~ed upon thpse discussinns, the City Cotulcil on Qctobcr 18, 2005
adopted an amendment to TnCerim Loniilg Regulation 4.08.19.1 5(c), removing the
rr;quirement that all PUDs access dircctly onto a collector ar artcrial strest as those terms
are defned in the City's adopted Street regulations.
9. On Octaber 25, 2005, the City Council passed an oral motion to inztnict
stafP to draft a FindinES, Conclusion aild T)ecision remanciing this appeal back to the
Hearulg Fxamincr for ftirther consideration.
10. The City Council has not considered any other factual evidence outside
the recorci as cstablished as of June, 14, 2005. •
TiI. CONCT.,iJSIOVS OF LAW .
- l. "T'he underlying City Code provisioil upon wluch the Hearing Examiner
analyzed tlus application lias matcrially clianged.
iv. nEC1SiON
1. '1"lie City Council hereby rcmands the *prelitninary phat application in [his
tnatter back to the Hearing Cxaminer f'or further consideration cQnsistenc witlt the rules
uid reculatioris adopeeci for tt1at pui-pose.
DA 1ED THTS day of November, 2005.
Signed nn behalf of a majority of the SPokane Valley City Coiulcil by:
. 17iana WilhitE, Mayor
ATTEST:
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk '
ciTY covnc:rL etvnIiNcs/
CONC_IalJS10NCIDECISIpN .APP-02-05 - 2 -
~ J
` J NQ'I'lCE OF FTNAL DEGTS:I:ON A\TD NOTICE OF 171GHT OF APPEAL
This decisinn can be appealed within hventy-one (21) calcndar days from the date
the decision is issued by filing a .T.and Use Petition with Spokane County Supcrior Caurt,
aa provided in RCW 36.70C, and meeting the othcr provisions of that chapter. This
decision shall act as official notice under RCW 43.21 C.075.
.
CITY COUNCii, FINDTNG:S/
CANCL•USIONS/DF CISIOY ANP-02-05 - 3 -
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
% Request for Council Action
~ i
Meeting Date: November 15, 2005 City Manager Sign-off*
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business (E new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Right-of-Way Property Acquisition Procedures -
WSDOT Agreements
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 8.26, Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property
Acquisition Act
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Informational Memo included with the October 25, 2005
Council packets.
BACKGROUND: The City's Appleway -Tshirley to Hodges project is a federally-funded project requiring .
the purchase of additional right-of-way to make the necessary improvements. The Washington State
Department of Transportation (WSDOl) is the overseer of all right-of-way acquisitions on federally-funded
projects per agreements with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).
To- purchase right-of-way with fetieral funds, the Ciry must enter into agreements with WSDOT. These
standard agreements require the City to acquire Real Property in accordance tivith the state Uniform
Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Act (Ch. 8.26 RCW) and state regulations (Ch. 468-
100 WAC) and applicable federal regulations. These agreements also require the identification of staff
responsible for property acquisition and administration along with a description or policyi on the city's
rr"~ approval of administrative settiements. `
Please note that the approval of tfiese agreements may require a minor modification to City Code Chapter ,
3.40.050, subsection 'H' with regard to approval of real estate purchases above appraised value. The
procedures required by WSDOT for right-of-way acquisition provides FHWA-approved oversight on the
appropriate use of federal funds. All right-of-way acquisitions have to follow these approved procedures
and must be approved by WSDOT prior to final purchase. These processes ensure that federal and local
funds are spent appropriately when purchasing right-of-way property.
OPTIONS: Approve the agreement; not approve the aqgreement; provide staff further direction
- regarding City Manager's execution of the agreements; or take other appropriate action.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve the agreement, authorize the City
Manager's or designee's signature thereon, and stipulate such agreement is to be effective November
23, 2005. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The purchase of rights-of-way for Capital Street projects are
included in the individual project budgets. Funds for the local match portion of these projects come
from the Street Capital Projects Fund and are included in each year's budget and in the Six Year
Transportation Improvement Program. STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten, Steve Worley •
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Right of Way Property Acquisition Procedures (WSDOT form)
2) Ciry of Spokane Valley Qualified Personnel Listing
3) City of Spokane Valley Administrative Settlement Procedures
4)'Waiver of Appraisal .
5) Government Agreement for Aid, Work by State - Actual Cost
~
Washington State
W~ Departmerrt of 7Yansportation ~ .
Organization and Address
Government Agreement
For Aid City orSpokane Vallcy 11707 E. Sprague Aventie, Suite 106
Work by State - Actual Cost Spakane Valley, 1VA 99206
Agreement Number Federal Employers I.D. Number
7 1-09 1 4 1 70
Region Land Acquisition, Relocation, and Related Services
F_asfern Region (For Highway, Road, and Street Purposes Only)
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , between the STATE OF
WASHING70N, Department of Transportation, acting by and through the Secretary of Transportation, hereinaRer the
°DEPARTMENT° and the above named organization, hereinafter the "AGENCY".
WHEREAS, the Uniform Relvcation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (PL 91-64G, 84 Stat. 1894)
ameRded by Uniform Relocation Act Amendments of 1987 (I'L 100-17, 101 Stat. 246-256) as implemented by the United States
Department of Transportation (49 CFR 24), Chapter 826 Revised Code of Washington (RCV1/), and Chapter 468-100 Washington
Administrative Code (WAC), all of which are hereinaiter referred to as the F2EGULATIONS, establish a uniform policy for the
expedient and consistent treatment of owners subjected to land acquisition practices and provide for the fair and equitable treatment
of persons displaced in connection with or as a result of public works programs or proJecfs of a State agency or local pt►blic body; and
WHEREAS, the AGENCY may propose to acquire or to administer the acquisition of real property in cannectfon with public works
programs or projects which may necessitate displacement of an individual, a family, business, farm, or nonprofit organization; and
,.)WHEREAS, the DEPARTMENT has an established organization to cornplete project impact studies and to conduct land acquisition,
~
~
property management, and relocation assistance programs in compliance with the REGUI.A?IONS and is empovrered to provide
such services to other govemmental agenraes pursuant to RCW 4728.140; and
WHEREAS, the AGENCY, assures the DEPAf2TMENT tMat the AGENCY's requests for services under this AGREEMENT vrill not
result from bidding, negotiaUon, or other onmpetition involving private enterprise; and
WHEREAS, the AGENCY may desire to obtain such services from the DEPARTMENT and the DEPARTMENT is willing to fumish
such seivices to the AGENCY, and both deem it in the interesi oi the public to enier into this AGREEMENT;
WHEREAS, the actual work to be perto►med shatl be specified tn a Task Assignment signed by both parties;
WHEFtEAS, the AGENCY shall pay for any work identified in a Task Assignment as specified by the terms of the Task Assignment
and this AGREEMEPIT; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the stated premise and in the interest of providing expedient, fair, equitable, and uniform
treatment of Iandowncrs and persons to be displaced by proposed land acquisition projects and pursuant to RCW 826.095, the
parties hereto agree as follows:
I
GENERAL
A. The DEPARYMENT shall, to its maximum ability, provide the AGENCY with impact study, appraisal, appraisal review, acquisifion,
relocation assistance, or property management services described hereinafter, all in accordance with the approprfate elements
of the departmenYs operatfng requirements set forth in the departmental publication M26r01 (H111), Right of Way Manual, except
where spec7fic operating requirements are otherwise described herein. All such requirements shall oonform to the
REGULA'CIONS. All work to Ge performed shall be identifred in a Task Assignment signed by both parties_
B. The normal vvorkload of the department shall have priority over any work performed under this AGREEMENT or any Task
Assignment. The vrork performed• under this AGREEMENT and the associated 7ask Assignments shall be pursued with care
and diligence, making every effort to recognize pertinent schedu(es of the AGENCY. The DEPARTMENT shall promptiy notiy
the AGENCY of any hardship or other inability to perform under this AGREEMENT including postponement of the agencys work
due to priority given to the departmenYs work.
.
C. 7his AGREEiNENT may be increased or decreased in scope or character of work to be performed if such change becomes
necessary, but any such change shatl be acoomplished by written supplement executed by all parties to said AGREEMENT.
r)nT Fnrm 77a-07F, FF Paqe 1 of 4
I ' .
D. 7he parties sNall agree vn a satisfactory completion date for work perFormed under any Task Assignment ("vrork completion
date"), which shall be specified in the Task Assignment. The AGENCY shall, upon satisfactory oompletion of vrork pertormE,;
pursuant to a Tas3c Assignment, issue a letter of acceptance Ihat shall include a release and waiver of all future claims idemands of any nature resulting from the pertormance of the work under the Task Assignment. If the DEPARTtV1ENT does rni--J
receive a letter of acceptance within 90 days following the work completion date, the work will be considered accepted by the
AGENCY. The AGENCY may withhold acceptance of work by submitting written notiticalion to the DEPARTMENT within a
90-day period. This notification shall include the reasons for rvithholding acceptance.
II
WORK ASSIGNMENTIREQUEST
A. Specific assignments shall be made in the form of a written 7ask Assignrnent to the DEPARTMENT by the AGENCY and signed
by both parties. Each 7ask Assignment shall contain an agreed upoii budget and schedule for atl services to be rendEred.
AGENCY approval is required for budget and schedule changes. The agreed upon budget will inGlude estimated DEPARTMENT
sfaff and relafed cosis in addition to applicabfe acquisitioNrelocation cost estimates. 7he AGENCY shall make such assignments
before any negotiations for property acquisition and before any discussion of price with the property owner, vrhen required by the
REGULATIONS.
B. The AGENCY shall furnish the DEPARTMEfdT with all infarmstion that has been compiled by or is available to the AGENCY
conceming the property to be affected by each particular project. Such information shall inGude, but not be limited to, copies of
approved right of aray plan sheets showing limits of parcels, rights to be acquired, and sufficient engineering data to develop legal
descriptions; a list identifying eacM property affected by the project by parcel number; a tabulation of improvements on each
properiy; the geographical location and boundaries of each property; and a description of how the project affeds each property.
C. The DEPARTMENT shafl fumish all labor, materials, supplies, and incidentals necessary to comptete the work assigned by the
AGENCY and shall fumish all information necessary to the conduct of a land aoquisition program.
D. The I]EPAF27MENT will at its discretion and upon written request from the AGENCY fumish the follotiving as required:
Impact Studies: Impact studies shall be made and reported in written narrative addressing potential influences by a program or
project on Isnd economics or land use faciors, displacemenUrelocation factors, acquisition costs, and relocation plans, as
requested.
Appraisal: Praperiy shall be evaluated and value oonclusions reported to oonform with departmental operating requirements
Any request by the AGENCY for court preparation and testimony wi[I be a separate Task Assignment under this AGREEMENT
and shall be submitted to the DEPARTMENT in a timely manner to provide not less than ninety (90) days notice in advance of
any expected couri appearance.
Appraisal Review: Appraisal reports shall be reviewed to conform with departmental operating requirements for validity of
value conclusions provided such reports are accompanied by a copy of the appraise►'s conVact and provided that the AGENCY
(or its agent) has determined that such reports appear to comply with the agencys procedural requirements and include
adequate description of the propeRy appraised and the interest to be acquired and appear to inctude adequate data supporUng
said conclusions. Yhe AGENCY shall be responsible for obtaining any necessary replacemenfs for unacceptable appralsal
reports or for obtaining any substantive revisions of fnadequate reports where such reports were furnished to the DEPARTMENT
by the AGENCY.
Acquisitlon: Every reasonablc effort will be made to aoquire real property by negotiations in accordance with the
REGULATIONS'and the AGENCY's condemnation authority, including the AGENCY's aulhority to aoquire limited access where
applicable. The DEPARTPAEN'P shall attempt to acquire all property arithin the project Ilmits without commencing condemnation
proceedings. A written offer will be presented to each owmer at the time price is first discussed for the property. The offer will be
documented and retained as part of the parcel file. Individual parcel diaries wrill be maintained containing adequate written
records of the negotrations including, but not limited to, the following:
1. Date and place of contacts;
2. Persons present;
3. Offers made (actual dollar amount);
4. Counter offers made;
5. Reasons settlement could not be reached ('rf appropriate).
Each request by the AGENCY shall specify the name of the grantes in whose name the properiy is to be canveyed. The
DEPARTMEN7 shall provide the AGENCY vrith deeds to all property aaquired and, wherever possible, instruments to clear
encumbrances of title from those deeds. The DEPARTMENT will provide information leadfng to clearing of encumbrances that
the DEPARTMEfVT cannot clear without legal action. Upon completion of a revietv of each acquisitionby the DEPARTMENTs
Title Section, all instruments and materials pertaining thereto evill be provided to the AGENCY. Clearing remaining ;
encumbrances of title and making the actual payment for the property shall be the responsibiliry of the AGENCY. Should it
become apparent that negotiations for attempted acquisitron have reached an impasse and sufficient time has elapsed for a
nnr G,,...,,14_n'7R oa Page 2 of 4
property owner to make a decision, the DEPARTMENT will, either at its discretion or upQn written request Uy lhe AGENCY,
submit to the AGENCY a candemnalion report that will contain a summary of negotiations, amounts of counter offers, if any, and
other historic data relative to such attempted aoquisition. The aclual filing of condemnation and subsequent litigation shall be the
responsibility of the AGENCY.
Relocation Assistance: Relocation assistance services shall be provided to conform Nrith departmental operating requirernenfs.
all relocation payment ciaims presented by displacees will be processed by the OEPARTMENT, but the actuai disbursement of
monies shall be made by the AGENCY. As may be assigned by the AGENCY, the DEPARTMENT wrll respond to and assist the
AGENCY wiih an appeal as to relocation assistance benefi/s filed by an aggrieved displaces; however, the AGENCY shall
remain responsible for any appointment of a hsarings officer, conducting hearings, maintaining records lhereof, and rendering of
the finat decision of the AGENCY.
Property Management: Effecxive management of agency- controlted properties will be provided in the name of the AGENCY in
conformity with departmentaf operating requirements.
E. At the completion of the Task Assignment, the DEPARTMENT will tum over to the AGENCY all records including appraisal and
appraisal revietiv reports, aoquisition, relocation assistance, and property management recorcis perfinent to the work performed by
the DEPARTMENT.
III
PAYMENT
7he DEPARTMENT shall be paid by the AGENCY for completed work and for servfces rendered under this AGREEMENT and
associated Task Assignments as provided hereinafter. Such payment shall be full compensation for vrork performed or senvices
rendered and for all labar; materials, supplies, and incidentals necessary to complete the work. The DEPARTMENT acknotivledges
and agrees that only those costs actually allocable to a project shall bs charged to such project.
A. The DEPARTMENT shall be reimbursed in full by the AGENCY for its direct and related indirect costs accumulated in accordance
with its current accounting procedures.
B. Partial payments will be made by the AGENCY within 30 days of receipt of the billings from the DEPARTMENT. F3illings vrill not
be more frequent than one per month. It is agreed that payment of any particular claim will not constitute agreement as to the
appropriateness of any item and that at the Ume of final billing all required adjustments will be made.
~ C. Upon termination of this AGREEMENT as provided in Section VI, the DEPARTMENT shall be paid by the AGENCY for serviCes
- rendered to the effective date of termination less all payments previously made. No payment shall be made by the AGENCY for
any expense incurred or tivork done follo►ving the effective date of termination unless authorized, in writing, by the AGENCY.
D. Final payment of any balance due the DEPARTMENT of 1he ultimate gross reimbursable amount, prior to the effective date of
termination, +nrill be made upon ascertainrrzent of such aalance by the DEPARTMENT and certification thereof to the AGENCY.
IV
LEGAL RELATIONS
A. INDEMNIFICATION: Each of the parties to this AGREEh4ENT shall protect, defend, indemnify and save harmless the olher party
from and against all liabilities, penalties, costs, losses, damages, expenses, causes of action, claims, demands, or judgments,
including without limitafion, reasonsble attomey's fees, arising out of or related to the terms, covenants or oonditions of this
ACREEMENT and such parties' performance or failure to perform any aspect of lhis AGREEMENT; provided, hawaver, that 'rf the
claims or suits are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of (a) the AGENCY, its agents or employees, and (b) the
OEPARTMENT, its agents or employees, including Utose actions covercd by RCW 4.24.115, the obligations shall be valid and
enforceable only to the eMent of the p~.arties' negligence; and provided further, that nothing herein sliafl require eithcr paity to hold
harmless or defend the other party from any claim arfsing from the sole negligence of the other party.
B. DISPUTE RESOLUTION:
1.7he AGENCY and the DEPARTMENT shall confer to resalve disputes that arise under this AGREEMENT as requested by
either party. .
2. The folfovring individuals are the Designateci Representatives for the purpose of resolving disputes that alise under tfiis
agreement: '
AGENCY DEPARTMENT
NamelTitle Region Real Estate Services Manager ~
Address
nnr c,.,,,, ooe.n7a ec Paae 3 of 4
3. in the event the Deslgnated Representatives are unable to resoive the dispute, the follawring individuals shafl confer
and resolve ihe dispute.
,
AGENCY DEPARTMENT
NamelTiUe Dave Mercier, City Nfanagcr Director, Real Estate Services
Address 1 l 707 E. Sprague, Spo. Valley, WA 99206 PO Box 47338, Olympia, WA 98504-7388
The AGENCY and the DEPARTMENT agree that they shall have no right to seek relief in a oourt of law unGl and unless the
Dispufe Resolution process has been exhausfed.
C. VENUE: In the event thal any party deems it necessary to institute legal action or proceedings to enforce any right or obligation
under this.AGREEMENT, the parties hereto agree that any such action or proceeding shall be brought in a court of competeM
jurisdiction situated in TMurston County, Washington.
V
NONDISCRIMItdATION
The DEPARTMENT shall compiy with Chapter 49.60 RCW and with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 USC § 2000d et seq.
With respect to the work to be performed by the DEPARTMENT durtng the contract, the DEPARTMENT shall not discriminate on the
grounds of race, color, sex, national orfgin, mantal status, age, or lhe presence of any sensory, mental, or physical handicap in the
selection and retention of agents, subcontractors or in the procurement of services or materials, leases, or equipment.
VI
COMMENCEMENT AND TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
7he work is of a continuing nature and will be in force as of the date of this AGREEMENT. The DEPARTMENT may terminate this
AGREEMENT at any time upon not less than sixty (60) days vvritten notice to Ihe AGENCY with or without cause. The AGENCY may
terminate t:his AGREEMENT or Task Assignment at any time provlded that the AGENCY reimburses the DEPARTMENT for all direct
and indirect costs incuRed to date. This AGREEMENI" shall terminate five years from the date of execution hereof unless otherwis; -"I,
terminated or unless extended in writing signed by both parties. Upon termination of this AGREEMEN7, the DEPARTMENT will tw"
over to the AGENCY all records including appraisal and appraisal review reports, acquisition, relocation assistance, and propeny`
management records pertinent to the work pertormed by the DEPAR7MFN7.
ftWITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT as of the date first above written.
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Au`:;.6CY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
By: By:
Title: Title: Region Real Estafe Services Manager
Date: Date:
Approved as to Form Approved as to Form
By Bryce Browm
Agency Aftomey Assistant Attomey General
N1ay, 2003
Date Date
nnm C,,,.., 17A_m9 Fc Page 4 of 4
Scpol~ane
= J Valley
11707 E Sprague Ave Suitc 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.ore
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
ADMINISTRATfVE SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES
The responsible official to approve the administrative settlement will be the City
Manager of the City of Spokane Valley.
In the event that a negotiated settlement for a parcel exceeds the fair market value,
the acquisition manager will document all explanations thoroughly. This
documentation will include the manager's justification for the action taken as well as
the values negotiated and the final amount of money agreed upon. All pertinent
information will be presented to the Program Administrator for approval. In the event
that the Administrator is uncertain of the eligibility of the settlement, he/or his
designee will contact the Region Land Acquisition Coordinator for approval. Once
the eligibility for settlement has been established, the City Manager of the City of
Spokane Valley will sign the authorization to proceed with the negotiated settlement. The signed authorization as wvell as the documentation will be placed in the right-of-
way file.
P:1Publuc Wor4cslFormsoAdministrativo Siottlement Procecfures
S`p~olCane
Val.ley
11707 E Sprague Ave 5uitc 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 * cityhall@spokanevalley.org
WAIVER OF APPRAISAL
The City of Spokane Valley (AGENCIO, desiring to acquire Real Property according
to 23 CFR, Part 635, Subpart C and State directives and desiring to take advantage
of the $10,000.00 appraisal waiver process approved by the Federal Highway
Administration for Washington State, hereby agrees to follow the procedure
approved for the Washington State Department of Transportation as follows:
Rules •
A. The AGENCY may elect to waive the requirement for an appraisal if the
acquisition is simple and the compensation estimate indicated on tfie PFE
(Project Funding Estimate) is $10,000.00 or less including cost-to-cure items_
B. The Agency must make the property owner(s) aware that an appraisal has
not been done on the property and that one will be completed if they desire.
,
C. Special care should be taken in the preparation of the waiver. As no review is
mandated, the preparer needs to assure that the compensation is fair and
that all the calculations are correct.
' Procedures
A. An Administrative Offer Summary (AOS) is prepared using data from the
PFE.
B. The AOS is submitted to AGENCY for approval.
C. The AGENCY signs the AOS authorizing a first offer to the property owner(s).
By: Approved:
City Manager Real Estate Services
City of Spokane Valley Washington State Department ,~Of Transportation p:tiPublic WorkstiFormsPAlaiver ofAppraisal
CTT1 .
4;oo p o""Rane . . Valley
~
11707 E Sprague Ave Suice 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206
549.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 1 cityhaU@spokanevalley.org
CITY OF SPQKANT~' VALLN;Y
OUAI.,IN IED PFRSONYE1., L1ST1N(i
' t'rog-ram Administration '
Neil Kersten, A1A, Cit}, of Spokane Valley Public Works Director. Neil is in eharge oi:'
capital improvements; dcvclopmenl review, storinwater cngineering, craffic engineering,
roaci niaintenaiicc. He oversees all activities in the Public Works Taeparbnent.
Appraisal
'
The City requeSLS th.is process to bc carricd out by WSnOT or an approved Fee
Apprai ser. Appraisal Review ~
The City- requests tliis process tca be csirriecl out by WSIUO'I' or an approved Fee
RevieNver.
Acyuisition
T'Lie City requests this prncess to be eacried out by WS1aOT. Kelacaticm
The City requests tbis process to be carried aut Uy WSDOT.
Propen Management
Neil Kcrsten, City nf Spokane Valley Public Works Dir.ector. See abovc for
qualifications.
~ i
Washington State
MAP Department of Transportation
Local Agency and Address
Right of Way Property Ciiy of Spokaue Valley
Acquisition Procedures 11707 E. Sprague Avenue
suite 106 Spokane Vall.ey, `VA 99206-5444
Departmeni of ths Local Agency
Yublic Work:s laepartrnent 'Che above named local agency, hereinafter called the "AGENCY", desiring to aetluire Real Property in accordance with
tlie state Uniform Reloczition Assistarice and Real Property Acc1uisiLion Ac;l: ((;h. 8?6 RCNV) and state regulations (C6.
468-] 00 1WAC) and applicablc federal eegulations hereby adopts the Followin; procedures to implement [he above
statutes ancf Washington Administrative Code.
The above named department orthe local agency, hereinafter called the "DE1'AR"liVlE\rC', is resnonsible for the real
properl.y acyuisition aiid relocatian activities on projects administerect by t:tie AGFNCY. To fulfill the above
requirements thc TaT;PARTVTr\jT will acquire right-of-way in accorcfance witb t}ie policies set forth in the Washington
State 17ePartmcnt of Transportation Idight of Way Mantcal (iV126-01) and I,oc•al Agencv Guideline.s manual (M 36-6).
77he AGENTCY has fl:ic following expertise and personnel capabili[ies to accomplish these fiinction5:
1. Include the followinb a,s they relate to the AGE'CY's rE;quest:.
a. List the funetions below for which the ageney has qualificd staffand tlhe responsible position. Attach a list of ,
the i.ndividuals on the AC,' I:NCY staff' wtio currently fill dhose positions and a brie.f Summary pf their
qualifcations. lhis list will raeed to be updated Lvlienever staffing changes occur. r1.n AG1:NCY will be
approved Co acquire bascd upon staffqualifications.
(1) Arogram Administation
Public Works Director
Agency Pasitian
(2) Appraisal •
WSDO1' or Appruvecl l'ee Appraiser
Agency Posflion
(3) Appraisal.Review
WSDpT or Approved Fee lteviewer
Agency Posifion
(4) Acyuisition
WS1701
Agency Position
(5) Relocation 1~~~SiaOT
Agency Posilion (6) Property Management
Yublie Works lairector
figency Position
(DOT Form 263•010 EF Page 1 oE 2 Rages
sro1
b. Any tunctions for w}tich the Agency does not have stafif will be contracted foe witli VJSUOT, ariother locEtl
agency with approved procedures or an outside contractor. r1n AGENCY that proposes to use outside
contractors for any of t}ie above functions will need to work closely with the WSDOT Local A;ency
Goordinator 3nd I-Tighways & I:ocal I'rograms to'ensure all rEquirem£nCs are met. When the AGENICY
proposes to have a staff persor► ne;qeiate who is not experienced in negotiation for kN4VA fiinded projects
the Coordinator must be given a reasonable opportwiity to review all offers and stipport:ing data beforc they
are presenfecl to the property owners.
c. An AGI:NCY wishing to fal:e advantage ofan Appraisal NVaiver process on properties valued at $10,000 or
less should rnake their prnposed waiver pmcess apart of xhcse proeedures. `1'he process outlined in LAG
manual Appendix 25.146 has already been approveti. T'tie r1GrNCY may submiC a procGSS different than dhat
shown and it will he reviewed and approved if it provides su .fficicnt informaCion to determine value.
d. Attach a copy of the Agency*s ticlministra[ive settlement policy showing ihe approving authority(s) anci the
prncess involved in ma}:ing administrative settlements.
2. AU projectS shall be available for review by the 1'HWA and the state at aiiy time and all nroject documen~~
sh111 be retained and available for inspecCion during the p11n development right-of-way and construction
stages and for a three year period following aecepl<tncE of Che prnjects by WSDOT.
3. Approval of the AGENCY's procedures by WSDQT may be eescinded at any tiinc the Agency is founci to tio
longer have qualified staff or is found ta be in non-compliance with ttae regulatic,ns. The reseission may be
applieri to aJl or p•trt of the functions appeoved.
.
L,UCAL ACE\°CY
Mayor or Chairman Date
WASHINGTON STATE DFPA.RTMFN7' O:H' T12ANSPORTATION
A pp rovecl :13y:
Real Estate Services Date '
DO7 Form 283•010 EF Pagc 2 of 2 Pages
6101
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLFY Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: November 15, 2005 . City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent 0 old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ infQrmation ❑ admin. report' ❑ pending iegisfation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Appleway Avenue Reconstruction Project - Tschirley to Hodges - Local
Agency Standard Consultant Agreement with David Evans & Associates for Design Engineering
Services. GOVERNING L'EGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: 1) Appraval of 2005-2010 TransPortation
Improvement,Plan on_April 26, 2005, which includes the Appleway Avenue Reconstruction
Project, 2) approval of application for federal grant funding for the Appleway Avenue
Reconstruction Project, 3) Council approved the PE phase in the amended 2005 Street Capital
Projects Budget on May 10, 2005, 4) Council approved the WSDOT Local Agency Agreement,
required for Federally funded pcojects, on February 22, 2005.
• BACKGRO.UND: The city received a$2,764,928 federal grant for the reconstruction of
Appleway Avenue from Tschiriey Road to Hodges Road. 7his project will reconstruct the
existing principal arterial to a five lane urban section. This project completes the gap that • currently exists between the recent urban improvements along Sprague Avenue to the west and
Appleway Avenue to the east. Curb, gutter, sidewalks and bike lanes wiU_also be constructed
as part of this project.
The City has entered into a Local Agency Agreernent with WSDOT for the release of
Preliminary Engineering (PE) funds for the design phase of the project. Budinger 8 Associates
is currently working 'on the geotechnical investigation for the project. Adams & Clark is also
' under contract to complete the necessary topographic survey work. .
The City has gone through the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) process for engineering
services and selected David Evans and Associates (DEA) as the most highly qualified firm to ' -
" perform design engineering and right-of-way acquisition for this project. DEA has submitted the
design engineering,•contract for execution. We have also received scopes and costs for their ,
portion of the right-of-way (RW) phase and construction (CN) phase. Supplemental Agreements
for this additional work will be needed at a later date.
Attached is a copy of the Local Agency Standard Consultant Agreement for David Evans &
Associates to complete the design engineering for the project. This contract, along with the
geotechnical and survey work, will exceed the PE phase of the budget by $14,252. This is due
mainly to the increased cost of using consultants, which was not considered when Spokane
County developed the project estimate for us. However, we have confirmed with WSDOT Highways and Local Programs that this increase is not a problem at this stage of the_ project. If
the total cost, incfuding right-of-way acquisition ($416,000) and construction ($2,588,400), is
expected to exceed the total project budget, additional federal funds may need to be requested
from SRTC.
.
~ , .
% OPTIONS: 1) Approve agreement, 2} reject agreement, or 3) provide additional direction to
staff. '
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute
the Local Agency Standard Consultant Agreement and Supplemental Agreements with David
Evans and Associates in the amount of $158,952 for the PE phase, $60,605 for the RW phase, ,
and $177,957 for the CN phase. ~
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The 2005 Street Capital Projects Fund 'budget includes
$26,100 for the local match portion of preliminary engineering for this project. The remaining
local match for this project will be included in the 2006 budget. The total estimated project cost
is $3,197,000. .
STAFF CONTACT: Steve Worley, Senior Capital Projects Engineer / Neil Kersten, Public
Works Director
ATTACHMENTS 1) Copy of the Local Agency Standard Consultant Agreement, 2)
Inforrnational Memo to Council, dated October 26, 2005, 3) Appleway Avenue Scope of Services #2 (Right of Way Acquisition), 4) Appleway Avenue Scope of Services #3
(Construction Administration). -
. ~
.
T
ConsuffantlAddressll"elephono
LaCal Agency pavid Evans and Associates, Inc.
^Standard Consultant 110 W Cataldo . .
Agreement Spokane, WA 99201
Q ArchitecturaUEngineering AgreemEnt 509.327.8697 ❑ Personal Services Agreement .
Agreement Number ProJeci Tiile And Werk aescription
LA5911 . ' Appleway Avenue Reconstruction
Federal ad Numbar , - Five-lane principal arterial for 1.25 miles, .
STPU L-3842(002) - Agreernent Type (Ghoose one) ' • •
. ❑ Lump Sum
Lump Sum Amount $ - Q Gost Plus Fixed Fee DBE Particlpation Overtiead Progress Payrrient Rate % ❑ Yes (~a No
Overhead Cost IVlethod Federal ID Number or Socfal Secx,rify Number
p Actual Cost 93-0661195 ,
Qa you require a 1099 fior IRS? • CompleSon Date. •
0 Actual Cost Not To Exceed °d 0 Yes 0 No . ,
E1 Fxed Rate • 173.32 . . - '
L ~ Fixed.Fee $ 14,873.00 . . .
Q Specific Rates -Of Pay Total Amount Authonzed.$ 158,952;00 . ❑ Negotiated Hourly Rate Management Reserva Fund $ ~ 5(}pp;00
❑ Provisional Houriy Rate Maximum Amaunt Pa able $
. Y 173.952.00
p Cost Per Unit of Woric . •
Index of Exhlbits . Exliibit "A" - Scope of Work ' ' •
Ekhibit "13" - DBF, Participation . . . '
Fxh.ibit "C" - Elactronic E.~cchaW of E1lgineering and Othcr Data
F..xhibit "D" - Payment (by Agreement Type) .
Exhibit "IY" - Consuitmit Fee DeterminaUOii '
E:~cli.ibit "F"- BreakdoWn of Overliead Casi '
Exhibit "G" - SUUCOI1tT21CL WOPICIFEe Detcrmination
E xhibit "FI" - 7itie VI Assurances : ' . Exhibit "1" - Psymr.nt Upon Teriniiiation ofAgrecment
, WibiC "J" - AEleged Cansulsanc Design Ecror Procedures Exhibit "K".- Consultant Claini Procedures '
Extu`tsit "L" - T iability Insuraiice Inasise . .
Echibit "IvP' - Certification llaciunents . . .
( l THIS AGKEP.MENT, madc and entti:ro3 into this $t h dayof November , 2005
betvveen the Lacal Agency of C ity of Spokane Val ley NVashingion, hereiitar-tzr ca[led thc "AGFNCY" ,artd Iho above arganizaiian hereinafter callsd t}se "C0NSULTAtNPI"'. ' .
DOT Farm 1406069 EF • PO3s 1 of 8 '
' - .
RCVisai 6105
WITNESSLTH TtiI.AT: •
NiTl[FR,E AS, the A.GEiNCY desires fo accomp(ish the above refe;ri,mceci pro}ect, and \
~
WEIEItFAS, the AGbTC1' does not have sufficieut staff to meei the reqiured comsvifiient aud thcrefore dcems it advisable
and desirsble to engage tlie a.ssiscauce of a CO\SUL1'AN'T to provide the necessary services for the PROJECT; and
WLT_FREAS, the CONSUL'['ANT represents tfiat he/she is in compliance with Ehe R'ashington State Statutes .elating to
professional registx•aEivn, iF sppl.icablc, and has signifieti a%hllingness to fiu'nish Cnnstilting services to the AGENTCY,
NpW THE_Ri.EFQRE, in considera[ion of the tenns, conclirions, cnveuancs and performanee contained herein, or attached and
incorporated and madc fl part hereaf, the parties hereto agree as follows:
I General Description of Work . The work under ehis AGRLI31AF..NT shall consist of the abave described Nvork and st;rvic.es as hcrein defined and necessary to
acc:omplish thc complete:d work for this PROJEGT. The CONSULTAi\'T shall furnish all services, Labor, and rellted equipment necessary to cQnduec and complete ttis work as designatul elsewheTC in ttus AGREEMF:NT.
. 11 Scope of Work
The ScoPe uf Work and projecfed ]evel of e.ffort n:quiral for this PRO.TECT is detailed in Exttibit "A" attachcd t►ereto and hy
this referenc;i: made a part of chis AGRELaNIT. ill General Requirements
• All aspeeis of coorctintltioa of tht work of this AGR.FFMPN'1 wiih ouesicie aSencies, groups, ar icidividuals st►all receive
advance approval by the 4GENCY• Necessary cnntlcts and meetings witli ageucies, graups, and/or indiyiduals skall be
coordiuated ttrough the AGCNCY. Thc COivSLJLTAN1' shall attend coordination, progress anci presentation meetings anth ' •
the AGiENCY xncUor such Fccterll, State, Commimity, City or County officials, groups or inciivicluals as may be rcquested by
tlie AGLNCY. The AGENCY will provide the GONSULTr1NT sufficiei►t itotice prior to meatings requiring CONSULTANT ~
participation. `T'he minimuui required hotus or days notice shall be agreed to bettiveen the AGFNCY and thc CONSULTANT'
and shown in Exhibit "A."
The CONSUL`tAN'T shttll prepare a mout6l}' progress report, ut a form appm<<ed by che t1.GFNCY, w)iich will oufline in
, cwitten and graphical form the various phases and the onler of perfonziance oFthe work in sufficient detail so tfiat [he pmgress
' of tile work can easily be evxluated.
Tha CONS[JLTAN'I', and each SUBC0INSUL1"ANT, shall not diseriminate on the U1sis nf rsce, coior, national origia, or sex in ttie performance of this contrzct_ The CONSULTAN'i', and each SUBCOivSUL.T'AN'1', shall earry out applicablc '
reqturzme;ilts of 49 CFR 1'art 26 in rhe award and administration of USD01'-assisced contracts. Failure by the CUNSiJLTANT
[o catry out the.5e requirements is a mateiial breach of this ACiI.' FiVIE'''I' t6at may result in thc ferntiination of this
AGR,FENffkhN'1'.
Par[ici.pal'ion for laisadvanLaged Business h nteiprises (faBE), if required; per 49 CFR Part 26, or particiPation of \![inority '
Business Enterprises (MBE), flnd `Vomen :13usincss Eaterprises (A'E3E), shall be shawn ou the hexcling of this AG12.FEel7ENT. ,
Tf D/M/WBE fuws are utilized, the amounts authnriZeci to each £uw and their certificalion uumber will be shown on E:chibit
"}3" utfached hereto and by this referencc: made 1 Fart of this AGREEMENT. If the Prime CO~Si3LTAN'C is a D13E fimi they
cnnst comply witlt the Comulercial Usefii.l Funceian (G'i1F) regulf►tion outliried in the AGE1i CY'S "DF3F Progcaiii Parcicipation
Plaai'.1'he mandacory Ta13F participation goals of thc AGR.FFMENT are thosc established by the WS170T'S Highwly and
Loc21 Programs ProjLtt JJeveloprnent Engi.neer ui consultation RRth the AGENCY.
r1I1 RePorts; PS&E materials, anci other data furnished to t}ie CONSUT.7'AN'T by the AGENCY s6a11 be retui•ned. .All
electronic files, prepareci by che CONSULTANT, must meet che requiremcnts as outlined ia Exhibit "C."
All clesigns, drawings, specificdltions, documents, and other wortc praducts, inch2ding all electronie files, prepared by thc
CONSULIANT prior to comple[ion or termiuaaon o1'this A.GREEM~N't are instnuuents of service i`or,this PRO.TECT, and ~
arc the praperty of ihe AGENCY. Reuse by the AGENCY or by others, accing through or on behalf of the AGENCl' of a;1y
sucli instruments af service, not occurrio,r, as apait ofthis PROJEC'I, sha11 be without liability or legal exposure to the "
CONSULT.Art 1.
?age 2 oi 8
_ IV Time for Beginning and Completion ` J 'rhe CONS ULTt1NT shall not beo n any work under the tcsms af this AGREEMEeIT until authori2eci izt tvriting by the
AGENCY.
A.ll work under this AGRF.MENT shall be completed by tiie date sho«n in the heading of ehis AGltl?M.7NT under
completion date.
I'he established completion time shnll not be extended because of 1uy delays annbutable to the CONSULTANl', birt may
be extended l7y the ACE\CX in the event of a delay attnbutablc tn the AGENCY, or because of unavoidable delays causcd
by an act af GOI) or govenuuenial 1ctions or other coadi#ions beyond the controi nf the CU'NSUI:°LAN'T. A. prior
suPpl€,~mentfll agrceanene issued by tt►e AGLNGY is required to exiend the establisheci cornPlction lirne. V Payment Provisions
Thc CONSUL'1'AN 1 shall be paid by the AGFNCY for completed work and services remciered iuider tfiis AGR.PFMFNI' .
a.s provided in Exhibit "D" attached hereto, and by reference made part of khis AGREEMENIT. Sueh payment svall be full compensation for work performcd or sL•cvicts rcncicrcd and for all labor, materials, siipplies, equipmrnt, and incideutals
necessary to complete the work. Ttie C0NSTJi.TANT shall confarm tn all aPplieSble portions of 48 CFR Part 31.
A post audit may be perforcued oa tbis AGR,F.P.,MENT. The necd for a pust sudit will be deteinuned by the Scace Auditor,
WSDb1' Excemdl Auciit Offiee and/or at the request of ihe A.OFriCY'S E'ROJFCT Manager. -
VI Sub-Contracting • .
Thc AGENCY percnits sub-contracts for those items ofwork as shnwn in Exhibit "G" 1tiached ]iereto and by this reference
ntade part vf this AGREEIvlEN'I'. •
Compcnsation Eor this sub-ic;onsultxint work shall be based oti tlte cost factors sho«m nn Exhibit "0." ,
/ ~ . .
` J Thc wori: of the sub-consuttant shall not exceed its rnaximwn amount gayable unless n prior amitten apnrovall has been
issucxl by the t1GENCY.
A.11 reimbursab]a direct labor, ovcrhead, clirect non-s31ary c:osts and fixed fee costs for the sub-consultanf shall be
substautiaied in the saiue manner as outlined 'm Section V. rVl sub-eontracts shall concain f►]1 appl.icable pmvisians of dus
AGREI3MENT. .
With respect to sub-consultatii pay,ment, the CONSIJLTANT shall comply wich rtll applicflble sections nf the Promp[
Payment laws as set forih iu RCW 39.04.250 azid 1ZCW 39.76.011.
. The CQNSULTA?1'T shall noc sub-cantraeC for the perfonnlnce of 1ny work under t.ws A.GR.EEIt9ENT wichout prior .
wiitten pcrrnission of the AGFNCY. No pcrrnission far sub-c:ontrac:ting shaU ereate, Uehveen the AGE~Ii CY 1nd
sub-coniraaCor, f+ny contr3ct or any other relationship. A DBF certi.fied sub-cotzsultant is required to perforrn 1 mittimum amaunt of their sub-contracced agreement that is established by the WST)OT Highways and Local Progmms Project
De<<cloprnent Lngince7 ixi conniltation with the AGE\TCY.
VII Employment The CON3ULTANT warrants rhat they have not cimployed or retaiated any company or Person, ot3ier thsn a bonl fide
eiatployee waricing salely f'or the CONSULTAN'f, to solicit or secure kfiis coutrict, and that it has not paid or agreeci to pay
,ury oompany or person, other than a bana (idc cmploycc tvorkiug solely for the CONSUT TAN7', any fee, conuvissiou,
perc:cntage, brokerage fee, gift, or auy other consiaeration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this
' confrack For breach or violation of this warrane, the AGEi\TLY shall have the right to azmul tliis AGREEMEN1' without
liability or, in ics discretiun, to c[educt froin the AGFtEBMENT price or consideration or orherwise recover the full ar.nount
of such fes, comrnis,sion, perc~.mtxgc, brokeragc fee, gi(t, ur eoutina,ent fee. .
Any and alI employees of the CONSUL7't1NT or other persons wllile engaged in the peiformance of any cvork or services
reyuirzci of the CO'NSLTLIA'VT under this AGREEil21:NT, sball be considered emplayces of the CONSULTANT only and '
not of the r\GENCY, and any and all claims that may arise under any Workinen's Compensaaon Act on behalf of saiti
' eniployees or other pcrsnns while so eugaged, and auy aud all claims made by a
Page 3 of 8 • ,
third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of the CONSULT'ANT'S eniployces or oiher persons ,~vhilc
sa engaged on any of the work or services prpvided to he renclered herein, shall be the sole oblieation and responsibiliry of
t
the CONSUL'1'ANT.
/
Thc CONSULTANT shall aot engage, on a full- ar part-time basis, or other basis, during cha period of the cantract, any
professional or tec3uucal pcrsomtel who are, or ha<<e bcen, at any tinie during the ptriod of the contract, in the employ of the
Lfnited Staces Denarlrnent of Transportation, or the STATE, or the AGE\iG`Y, excepi regulaely retired employecs, withauC .
written consent of the public employer of such per;on.
VI11 Nandiscrimination During the perf'armance of this contracc, the CONSULT.4IT17, for itseLf, i~, assignei~s, ar►d suocus5ors in interest agrees tp
coznply N%rith the following laws and regtilarions:
TiY1e VT of ttie C0.ril Rights Act of 1964
. (42 USC Chapcer 21 Subchspter V Section 2000d through 2000d-4a)
Fecieral-aid I-iighway Act of 1973
(23 USC Chapter 3 Sec[ion 324)
' Rehabilitatiou Act of 1973 '
(29 USC Ctiapter 16 Subcltanter V Section 794)
Age Discriminxtion Act of 1975
(42 USC Chapfer 76 Section 6101 et seq.)
Civil Rights Re.storstiou Act of 1987
(Public Law 100-259)
America,n with DiyRbilities Act of ] 990 (42 USC Chapter 126 SeGtivn 12101 et. seq.) 49 CFR Part 21
• 23 Cr"R Part 200
[tCw 49.60. 180
Itt relatiau to Tit(c'VI of che Civil Rights Act of 1964, the CONSUI:.11 ANT is bound by ilie provisioos af F?tbibit "H"
attachcd hereto and by this reforence madc pait of this ACTREEN"T, and shflll inelude the at[ache(i Eaclubit "H" in evcry
sub-conrrucc, including procurc:ment of materials anct leases af equipmcnh, unJess cxempt by the R.egularions or duectives
issued pursutuit therCfo.
IX Termination of Agreement
The.cigliC is reserved by die AGFNCY to terniinate this AGRELMENT at airy time upon ten (10) d.ays writien natice fo the
CO'NSULTr1iV'C. . .
Tn the evenc this AGRLM4FNT is terminated by the AGENCY otlier than for detault on the part of the CONSULTANT, a
final pa}ment shall be macle to the CONTSULTrIW as shawit in E) duUit "1" fur the ty-pe of A.GRM4EI`1T usec!•
Na payrncnt skall bt made for any work comple.ed aRer ten (10) days foilowing receipt Uy the C0NSULTANT of the
Notice to Teiminate. If the accuniuiated paymenc made to the CONSULTANT prior to \otice of'Cermination exceuls the
total :imount that would be due whc:u computeci as set Porth herein aUove, then no final paynient shall bc due and the
CO\`SUL''1'AN"[' shall in-Lniediately ceimburse the ACihT1CY for any excess paicf.
Lf the services af the CnNSULTAN T are terrninated by the AGFTICY for deEault on the part of the CONS`UL,TANT, the
abovc formula for payment shall not apply. ~
Page 4 of 8
Tn such av'evc:nt, the aunotaut to be paid shal.l b° determincd by the ACTENCY with cnnsideration given to i]te achiAl ensts
! J~ incarred by the CQNSUT.; CANT in perfoiriittg ttle work to the daEe qf tectvinalYOn, the xmount of work origi.na.liy requircd
which tivas satisfaetnrily completed to date of termi.nation, whether that w-ork is in a form or a typc: which is usable io the
AGFNCY at the tinie of ternination, the cc>,st to the AGE\'CY of emp]aying another fum to complete the Nvork required
• sud the time whicv m1y be required Eo do so, dnd other factors wh.ich aifect the vslue to the AGENCY af'Ehe work
perfamied at the time of Eerminakian. '
Unclcr no cffcumstauces shall paymeut made under this subsection exceed the amount, which wnuld have been rnade using .
the fonntda set forth above. '
If it es detemiined for any reason that the COiVSULTANT was not in ciefault or that the CONSULTANT'S failure to
psrfonn is without the CONSUL`l'ANT'S or it's employee's aefault or negligence, the termination shall be deeiued to be a
cerminaeion far the convenierice of ths AGFNC.Y. Iti such an event, the CONSUT..TE1INT wotild be reinibursed for actual
cosn i.n accordauce with the tennination for other than default clauses ]isteti previousty.
In fhe evenC of ttie death of aay member, pdctncr dr officer of the CONSULTANT or any of its, suPervisory p•arsonitel
assigned ro the FRO7F,CT, or dissulution of the par#nerslup, tertnittadon of the earporation, or disaffiiiation of the
principally involveci employec;, the survi-,Rng members of the CONSULTANT hereby agree to complete the work undcr the
teims of this AGREEMFNT, if requesied to do so by the AGENCY. Ttiis subsecdon shalt not be a bar ca rcncgodation of
the AGREEiMF..NT between the sivv7vino memhers of the CONSULTANT and the AGE\zCY, if the AGiCY so chooscs.
In the event of the death af any of the parties listed in ihc pn:viaus naragraph, sl.iould the surviving members of the
CONSULTANT; Nvith the A.GENCY'S concurrencc, desinc io terminate this AQREEi'4113NT, paymenC shall be made as set forth in the secaud parigrqph af this sccrion.
Payment foe any pact oC the wnrk by the AGENCY shall not constitute a waiver by the AGENCY of any remedies of any
type it may ltlve againse the CONSLTLTANT for any breach of chis AGREEMEtN'I' by the CONSTJT TANT, or for fnilurc of
r]xe CONSCTLTANT to perfomiwork required of it by the AGFNCY. Forbearznce of any rights under tie AGR.CLMENT
will not consdtute -,vaiver of eudtlement tn cxercise those rigltts with respeet to ;uiy future act or amission hy the '
CONSULTA.1VT. . .
X Changes of Work •
' The COTTS ULT.ANT shall make such changes and re-visions in the complete work of this AGREEMENT as nccessary to .
corrc:ct errors appeaeing therein, when required to do so by the AGffiNCY, Nvithout additional compensarion rhereof. Should
the AGFNCY fincl it desuablc for its mvii purposes tu have previously satisfactorily completed woi'k or parts thereol'
changed or revised, the CONSULTANT shall rnalce such revisions as directed by tlie A.GExVCY. `Chis Nrork s}uall be •
• considered as Lxtta Work snd will be paid for as herein prnvidcd under Section X[V. XI Disputes
Ar►y dispute conceming questions of fact in connection rviih the work not di;posed of by AGREEIvfENIT betvveen the
CONSULTANT and the ACEiNCY shall be referred for determination to the Director of Public NVorks or AGE,i 1CY
• Engineer, whc~~e decision in the matte:r shall be final uld binding on thc parties of this AGFt.FFMFN'T; provided, however,
that if an action is broubht challcnging the Di.i•ector of r'tablie lVorks or AGENCY Fngineer'S decision, dlat decision shall '
ve suUject co de novo judicial reNiew. Jf the plrtiss to fhis AGRFFVfEN'f mutually agxee, disputes coucerning alleacd
desir„n errors will be cnnducied uncler the proceduns found in EYhibit "J", aud disputes conceening claims will bc '
, conducted under the procedures founti ui 1?xhibi[ "K". XII Venue, Applicable Law, and Personal Jurisdiction In the eveut that either parey deems it neczssary to institute tegal action or proceeciin,a. s to euforce auy right or obligation
under this AGREFIviF1'T, the parties tiereio agree Ehat any stich action shall be initiated in the Superior couzt of the St3te of ,
Rrashington, sinaaied iu the county in whicli die AGEiVCY is lncutc;d. The parties Itereto zgree that 1ll questions shall be
resolved by application of R'ash.i.ngton law aud that the pariies to sucti action shall have the right af appcal from such
decisions of the Sugerior c-0urt in accordance with the laws of nce State of Washington: The CONSi.FLTANT hereby
~
.
ronsents co the persanal jtirisdiction of the Superior cotirt of the Statc of Washino on, situatecl in the cotiuity iei which the
ACE\TCY is locatcci.
Pagc 5 of 8
Xlii Legal Relations
Tfie CONSLJI..TA.iN'T shaEl comply vrith all Federal, Sfa[e, and tacal laws and ucdinauces applicablc to the wnrlc to bf: clone
under this AGREFIvtEiVT. This eoukract sli111 be interpre:ted and constnzeci in accordauce wiili the laws of the State of ~
Wa.shington. , .
T1te CONSULTANT shall itldemnify and hold the AGFNCY and thc STATL aztd its officers and employees harmlcss from
and sball. grocess and defcnd at its own expense all claims, demands, or su.its at law or eqiiity arising in whole or in part
fram tha GOVSUC,TAINT'S negligence or breach of any of its ablig:ttions under this AGRMN-i]?NT; providcci Ch9t noihing
herein shall require a CONSULT'ANrI' to indenuufy [lte AGEI`jCY or the S1"ATE against and hold hatmless 'he AGENCY .
or tthe STATF, from e]aims, dernaucls or suiss based solety upon the conduct of ttie AGEiNCY or the STA"lE, their agents,
nffiCeY'S 1ttd empl0yees; and provided fiirtlter th at if the claims or sl2.iis are caused by or risltlt fmm the cUncurrent '
negligence of (a) the CONSULTr1NT'S agenLs or employees, aud (b) dte AG~1CY or the S'1'ATE, iheir agcnts, officers
3ncl emptoyees, this indemnity provision with resPect to (1) ciaims or suits ba.sed uptin such negtigence (2) thc costs to t.he
AG EiNCX ot'the STA'T"F, of dcfcnclicg sizch claini; and suits shall be valid anci enfoccc3ble only to the extent of the
CONSULTAN'1"S aegligence or thc negligence of ihe CONSULTA,VT'S ageuts or employees.
'I'he CONSULTAN'T' S relation to dte AG .li TCY shall bc xc all times as fui independent cnntraetor.
The CONSUL, ~'Ai~V'1' shall comply with all applicable secrions of the applicable Etlucs laws, includi.ng RCW 42.23, wiuch
is the Cadf; af Ethic:s for regulating contrLCC interesC by rnunicipal officers. The CONSULTAN`1 specifically assumes
potential liability for actions brouoC by the CONSUT..TANT'S own c,7nployees against the AGENCY ant1, solely for t6e
pufpose of this indemnification bnd defense, che CONSULTANT spwifically waives any immunity undcr lhe state
itidustrial insurance law, Title 51 RCW. • ,
Unless okhenvise specified in the ACREL,'V1ENT, tie AGFNCY shail be responsiblc; for adcninistration of construccion
contrnets, if aity, on the k'ROJECT. Subjcct eo the processulg of a new sole source, or an acceptable supPlemental •
aa cement, the CONSUL'lAN!1° shall Pravidc On-Gill assistance to the AG ..}~a TCY during contract adnti.n.ish-atian. By -
pmviding such assistanec, the CONSULTA,~i'f shall assumc no respovsibility for: proper cqnstruccion techniques, job site .
• safety, or any construction contractor's failure to perforw its work in accordance with tlie contract documenrs. _
"Ihe CONSUf TA.►IT shall obtain and keep in force duaTng the terms of Che ACi12LLMFNT, or as atherwise requiretl, tfie
fnllowiug insurance w-ith comganies or ttuough sources approved by the StaCe-Insurraxnce Comtnissioner pursuaut to Title 48
RCV1'. .
Insurance Coverzge
' A. Worker's compensation and employer's liability inswanee as required by the STATE. .
. B. Comrnr.rcial general liabilify and properiy damago insurance is1 au aSgregate . mounc not less than twa million
dollars ($2,000,000) for bodily injury, ineluding death attd property damagc. Ttte per occurrence amount shall
nol exceeci tine rnilliott clollai5 ($1,0(}0,000).
C. Vehicle Liability insuranct: for any autotnobile used in an amount not less than fl one million dollar ($1,00O,OOQ)
combineti si[gle limit. '
F.xceptittg ihe Wocker's Compensation Insurance and auty FIcofessional Liability Insur;tttce sacured by thc CONSUL'lAINT,
the AGENCY wrill bc named on all policies as an additional instu+ed. The CONSULTANT shaLl fuinish the AGEh'CY with
•verification of insurance and cndflrserneuts required by tbe t1.GREEVIEN1". T`he AGENCY reserves thc right to require
' complecc, certilied copies of 211 required insurance palieies at any tijne.
All insurauce shall be obtained fiom an insumnce company anthorized to do busuiess iu the State of Washingtoii. 7'he
C0INSIJLTANT shall submit a veiification of inswance as oud'uled ahove wittiiri fouricen (14) days of the erecution of tkfis
AGREENIE\rT to the AGF,NC1'.
\7o cancelladon of ttze foregoung policies shall be effective withaui thiriy (30) days prior narice to the ACTENCY.
. ,
T'he COivSUL.TAN'I''S professional liability to the AGhi,ICY shall be limited to the atnoaztt payable under this
• ACR.EEMFNT or one million ($1,000,000) dol]ars, vvhichever is the greater, unless rnadifieti by L"xhibit "T In no case
shaU thc CONSULTAi~1T'S professional liability ro third parkies be limited in any way.
Page 6 of 8
The AC7ENCY wi[1 pay no progress payments ttnder Seation V until the CUNSULTANT hxs fiilly comp]ied x=rith this
' section. This mnedy is not erclusive; znd the AGENCY and the STATF inay take sueh other action as is available to it '
under other provisians of this AG12EEi~1LNT, or othenNise in law. XIV Extra Work
A. The-AGENCY may ae any time, by writtea order, maie chsngcs Nuithin the general sr,ope of the AOR.EEMLN'T in
the services to be performed. _ B. If any such chauge causes an uicrease: or decrease in the estiniateci cost of, or the time requirs;ci for, performanee of
any park of the work under ehis AGREEytENT, whether or not changed by the ordcr, or otherwise affecLs any other
terms and conctitions of the AGFtFEM'NT, the AGENGY shall make an equitable adjustment i.n the (1) maacimum
amoune payable; (2) delivery or corripletion schedule, or bath; and (3) ot3ier affecteci terms and shall cnodify the•
AGREEiITEN'1 aceorciingly. C. The COIvSULTr1'N'i' must subroit flny "request For equitable adjustment", hereafter referred to as "CC.A]M", under
this clau5e witbin thirry (30) days frotn the date of receipt af the written order. However, if the AGFNCY decicies
thnt the facts justify it, the AGENCY may receive ared act upon a CT.AL\4 submitted before fwal paymeut of the
AGREEMETFT. .
D. Failure to agree to any adJusiment shall tre a dispute under [he llisputes clause. Howcver, nothing in this clausc
shall excuse the CnNSUf TAN'l from proceeding with the AGREEMENT as changcd_
E. Nntwithstanding the term; and conditions of paragraphs (A) and (B) above, the maxiinum amoiiut payabte for this .
AGREF.MENT, shaU not be inccea.sed or considered to be increased exccpt by speciCe writicn supplcmcnt ro this
' AGRFP► N . , XV Endorsement of Plans •
if applicable, the CONSUL'I'ANI' sf►all plact; thcir cndorsernent on all plans, esrimltes, or any other engineering data
f,unished by them.
XVI 'Federal and State Review -
The Fecleral Highway Atlnunistrarion and the VJsstungton Statc Dep:irtment nf Tran.sportakion shall have the right to '
participate in the review or• exsinination of the work in proges;.
XViI Certification of the Consultant and the Agency
Attached ttereto as Exhibit "M-1(a :uid b)" are the Certifications of the CONSUJ::I'AN1' aud the A.C+01L.Y, l:xhibit "M-2" '
Certificstiou Kegarding Dcbarmcnt; SusPension and Othee Respousibility Matters - Primary C;overed Transactions, Exlubit '
"~V[-3" CcrfiticatiUn Regarding the Resttictiotls of the Use oFFederal Funds fnr Lobbying and ExhibiC "M-4" Certificate of
G`urTent Cost or Yriciug Uata_ Erhibit "M-3" is reyuircd only in AGRI?FMENTS over S 100,000 and Exhibit "M-0" is
required anly in AGREEI~ ..iF~1T:S over $500,000. XVIII Complete Agreement
This cioctunenC and rePeresnced attachments contain all co<<eiiuits; sxipulltions, atid provisions agrc;ed upon by the pardes.
NTo agent, or ie,~pi-esentative caf eidier party has sudiority to make, and 1$c pdrtics shall nnt be bound by or tie liable for, any
statement, rcprescntation, pmmise or ageement not set farth herein. No ch3nges, ame.ndments, nr modificatians of the
terms hcrrof shall beyalid unlE,ss reduced to writing and sietted by the parties as an arnenclment to t}iis AGREEMENT.
- XIX Execution and Acceptance
This AGRLafl'LNT rnay bc simultaneou,sly e:cecuted ui several coiiuterpF►rts, each of which shall be deemfxi co bc an
original having identical legal effect.l7ie CONISCJL7'A~~T docs hcneby ratify ancf adoPt all statements, rapresentations,
. warranties, covenants, aiid agreements contained in the praposal, ancE the suppoitiuig fvateiial siibnutied by tlie •
CONSULTA►\'I', ancl does hereby accept the AGREB%9Ei\T and agrees to all of the terms xnd conditions thereof:
:
. Page 7 oi 8
Consultant/Addressrclephone ,
- Supplemental Signature David Evans and Associatzs, inc. \
Page for . I 10 west cataido Standard Consultant Spokane, wa 99201 Agreement 509-327-8697• Agresmant Number Project 7itle And Work Descrfption -
LA5911 • Appleway Avenue Reconstruction
Federal Afd number Five-lane principal arterial for 1.25 miles
STPUL-3842 002 '
LocalAqency
City of Spol<ane Valley, WA - '
THIS AGREEA4EN7, rnade and entered into this day of November 2005
between fhe Local Agency of City of Spokane Valley , VVashington, hereinafter called the-
"AGENCY", anci the above organization hereinef#er called the "CONSUL7ANT". '
In witness whereof, the par#ies horeto have Executed this AGREEMENT as of the dey and year first
above written. - CONSULTANT LOCALAGENCY
By BY .
• Consultant D id Evans and Associates, It1C. Agency
By U~ BY .
consuithnt David Evans and Associates, IC1C. Agency ' • '
. ' . _ gY ' -
Agency By• .
, ' • Agency.
DOT Form 140-089 EF Appendic 31.91U '
ReJ.Sod 61U5 •
Exhibit A-1 ~
.
. ~ Scope of Work . ~
Project No. STP U L-3$42(002)
See Attached Scope of Work
~..._1 .
Documents To Be Furnished By'The Consultant
Bid-ready PS&E documents '
. .
qOT Form 140-0E0 EF ExhiFr'- A-1 •
Retidsed FMS '
\
Appleway Avenue Scope of Services #1 (Roadway Design)
Tlus pzoject involve5 i.mpravements to Appleway Avenuc from just east of the signal at Sprague.Avenue
to J3zoaclway Avenuc, for a tota,l lenbth of approximately 12 miles. Thc existing four-lane cement
concrete roadway will be obliterated and a five-lane asphalt coucrete roadway with curb, sidcwalk, aud.
drainage impravements will bE consfructed. The signal at Barker Road will be upgraded to cu.rrenf City
and tiVSDUT statidards. Tt is understood that a poriion of the project on the east end is located in
Spokane County; the City will ptusue anci fi.naliie all ageemeuts and arrangements pertauung to ttus
short scction of roadway. .
The project corridor fcatures commercial parcels on the norFli side o:f Appleway Avenue and a former railroad R/W (cu.rrently owned by Spokwie Coimty) n.n the south sidE of the road. 'T`he agreements to
transfer the railroad R/W from the County ln the City arc cturently bei.ng developed. Tt is anticipated that
this 1.7AV will be transferred during the course of the road design project, and that it will be available ror
use as part of the road prism. Right of way acquisitious will like.ly be required at the iutersections of
Appleway Avenue with Lung, Barker, and M:icltigan (six total parcels). Yn additipn, formal use aF the
fornier rail.road property will reqlure deeds to he preparecl (three total parcels). Itight-of :Entr},
agrecments «ill be obtaiued fi-om all parcels on whicli ituprovetnents (i.e., driveway tic-ins) will occur.
' This project will be a collaborakive ef.fort betwecn the City of Spokane Valley aud David Lvaus and
Associates (DEA), and will require worlcing closely with adjacent property owners. The City will providc supportiug docuinentation. and data such as survey inapping and geotechrucal invcstigations, as ,
well as coordiuating the trans.fe.r of the railroad 17/W from the County to the City. - DEt~ ',Vill provide -~engineering and public i.nvotvement services as necessary to pcepare the project far constzucl'ion i.n the
spzi.ng of 2006. DEA may also provide R/W acquisidon services a,s needeci. To the greatest cxtent
possible, the personal and busincss interests of the praperly oNvncrs «dll be tal:en into consicierahon ~
during the R/W acquisitio.n process; and during the conshuction of:' the improvements. The Scope of
Scrvices f.or RIW acquisition is included ii.l a separal•e documcnt.
DEA iiiay provide construc:tion acimi.ra.istr.ation services far the project,- including:. conducting the pre-
- consh-uction vn.eeting, performing daily coiistauction obscrvaiYOn, revietiving materials submitlals,
• processing ehange orders, a.ud dvcumenting the project in accorclance Nvith WSDOT regularions.
Materials testing Will be pcrformed by a geotechn.ical subconstiltant employeti by DEt\, however; it is
assumed that construction staking will be provided by the Cnntractor. Thc Scope of Services' for
construction aclmuustration is iP.cluded in a separate dociunent. .
Thc followi.n.g scope of work for the roadway design was clevclopEd a.fter -,dew-i.ng the proj cct corridor and
discussi.ng the goals of the project with. Cii•y of Spokanc Valley engineers.
1. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION 1.1 Project Coordinafion with City
DEA.'s projECt manager will coordinate with the City project naanager on a continual basis .f.o.r the
du.ration of tliE project. Means o.f communication shall include telephonc calls,_letters, and e-mails; all
conesponclEncc beriveen DEA anci the City will be docuuiented for the project filc. A,pplewayAvcnue Scope of Work
K/dNbo/Appleway Scope.doc Paga i of9
j
\ ~ • .
1.2 Project Invoicing and File Management ]aFA aclIIiuustrative staff wil.l prepare montb.ly project invroices and track the project budgct on an
oiigoing basis. `I'he administrative staff and the DEA project. manager Nvill also be r.esponsible for
maintainiug paper and clectronic documents throughout the lifc of the project.
2. PROJECT INITIATION 2.9 Setup of Project Fi/es -
77EA aduii.nistrative staff will assemble the electronic and papcr project files. that will be useci for the
durafion of tlic project. Additionally, pTaject folders -svill be set up on DEA's cxternal ftp site for use by
the City anci DLA. 2.2 Collect Existing Data from Cify, County, and Utilities
DEA wiU collect exisling roadway, right of way, se-vver, watcr, power, telephone, a.ud nalural gas
information .f.roiu the City of SPokane Valley, Spokane County, and the utility providers. bEA will
attempt to obtain thi.s i.nfonnation in GIS £onnat for convcnient caorclination wit3i the survey base map.
If elecironic data is not availabl.e, theu DE-A will abtain har.d copies of ttic inforrnation and place it on the
. . base inap directly. . .
~ 2.3 DEA KickofiMeeting . . A DEA team kickoff meeting will tic held i.n the Spokaue ofrce to describe the project and the project
goals l•o team mcmbers. Specific tasks and sehedules will also bc assigned al• this nleeting. DEA teaui
members lacated iu othEr offiees will attend the meeting via teleconference.
3. PRE-DESIGN
3.1 Roadway Design Standards ' . '
:DEA will inve..stigate aud compile the standards to be «sed .f.oi- tlie ciesigu of the project, such as road
cl.assifi.cation, acccss spacing, curb retu.rn radii, roadway dra.inage, illumination zequiretncnts, and signal
design requ.irements. These recluirements will be drawn from the most current eciitians of the W>S.TaOT,
AASHTO, mid Spokiine Caunty road design sl:andartis. A, ]7es.igu Report will be prepared accoiding to •
the WS1aOT Y.AG manual guidelincs to summarize the renturements.. • •
3.2 Initial Utility. Coor.dination ~ DEA wil] conduct preliminary coordinatioiy with the utility providers to ciiscuss the proposed road
improvemcnts, the impact of the improvements on the e:cisting utilities, and the retocat-ions or upgrades
the utility providcrs may insfall during the roacl project. AIl discussions wikh the, providers will bc
docu.aiented for the project file. .
3.3 Typical Secfions
Usi.ng i.nformation obtained from the City aud the geotecfuucal repgrt, JaFA will prepare typi.cal scction
drawings for t1ppleway. Avenue, :Barker.:EZoad, Greeuacres Ro3cl, and the nuscellaneaus City roads.
~
. i
• Ap,alewayAvenuc • Scope of Work
K/d-,vbca/App1ev+ay Scope.doc Page 2 of 9
. ` /
4. PRELIMINARY DESIGN
4.1 Prepare Preliminary Roadway Design Plans DEA 'Adl.l cievetop preliminary roadway plans illustratuig the propased horizouta1 and verEical alignment
f.o.r. Appleway Avenue. .Iu additian, preliminary intersection'Plans for Long, G.reenacres, Corbin Place;
Barker, and Michigan will be preparcd to illuskrate the geometric layout of each intersection.
4.2 Prepare Preliminary Traffi-c Signal and lllumination Plans .
1'he ex-isti.ng span wire traFfic sigual at the interseclion of East AppTeway .Avenue and Barker Road will
be removcd as pai-t of the roadway improvcments on Appleway AvenuE. llEA ivill prepare the
preliminary ciesign for a new mast-artn traffic signal for this location. The design oC thc traffic signal
shall ineet WSDO'a' cie.sign star►clards as modified by the City of, Spokane Valley. The neNv traffic sipal
Nvill bc dcsigncd so that the eacisti.ng traf:-~'ic signal will remain operational during constniction of
Appleway Avenue: Signal loops will be designed using dilemma zone protection.. The signal £eatures
will incl.ude countdown perlestrian heacLs, Opticoiu emezgency vehicle detection, Opticom indicatiou
lights and other features requestecl by the City. DEA Nvill perfonn a. .5peed study, which will be uscd to
determine lacat7on of incluction loops for ttie traffic 5ignal. Traflic counts will be performeci for the ATN4
peak, uudday, and PiVi peak Peziods to aid iri the desigii. of the signals. t-1 Syuchro a.ual}-sis will be
• prepared fof the proposed intcrsECtion, and apha.sing plan will be developed. TaEA's traffic signal •
project ulanager Nuill inake one site visit ta obscrvc cxisting conditions, anci plan the physical positioni.ug.,
of the proposed si~mal.
The plans will iuclude details anci construction notes requiring the contractor to maintain the existing txaff-ic signal cluring construction. This could includc shifting signal head_s and providing temporary
detectian. Required feattires will Ue show-a i.n the plans.
_ A prelimina.ry design f.or tlie illuinination syslenl at t1ZE new signalized intersection wi.ll be included with
the sigrial plans. Illumination vvill cover the immediate i.ntcrsection viciniYy and eh3nnelized app.roaches. It is assumed that no other illu.wi.nakion will be required on tWs projecti. Additional illumination may be
required (in aCCOCdartCe with WSDOT illununation requiremcnts) I at ot.tier i.ntersections. However,
adtlityona] illuinination nof coverecl in this seopc ofwork aucl wil.l require a eontract amendluent.
Additionall.y, xhe layaut of a condiut aud ju.nction box system Nvill be preliuiinarily designed alpng the
entire project length foz a future interconnect system, and tlie infrasti-uchu-E for a pennatient traffic count
statiou will be clesigned al Barker Road. .
T'he existing traf:6c signal at East Appleway Avenue and Tscturley Road is ouisicie the projcct li.mits and '
it is assumecl that no improvements to khis signal W-il1 be included in th.is project.
4.3 Prepare Preliminary Sformwafer Plans and Report
DEA will devElop prEliininary stonnwater plans illustrating the localions o:C 'grassed ici.filtration areas that
may be requircd to augnent the linear inftlixation swales. The uifilkrat7on areas and associated dcywells .
will be sired using the most •current City stanciaxds. A tccluucal report summarizing the preliminary
treaiment and disposal calculations will alsa be preparEd.
AppletivayAvenue Scope of Work .
K/d►vbo/Applevvay Scopc.doc . • Page 3 of 9
4.4 Prepare Preliminary lrrigation Plans
DEA will cievelop preliminary irrigation plaiis for the grassed infiltra.tion arcas. The ppu.i.ts of connection
aud meter,i.ng requirements Nvill be coarcii.nated «=ith tlle local water district, and equipm.ent requiremeuts
• will be coord.inated with the City. .
4.5 Prepare Preliminary Traffic Control Plans _
DE-A will p.r.epare prelimi.nary permanEnt lraf_fic control plans that wil.l include delincation, sig';r,g,
necessary illumination, a.nd pavement marki:ngs depicting circulation. `
4.6 Ca/culate Preliminary Quantities
Prelimiuary ro adway quautities far the project componentis wili ve cieternuncd by DEA.
. 4.7 Preliminary Opinion of Probable Cost ' A prelimiriary opinion of probable cvst will be developcd by DEA with input f'rom the City following
prepazation of all Prel.imi.nary Design plans.
4.8 Preliminary Specifications .
DEA will prepaze preliminary specificatious for the projeet in accordance with the most current WSDQT'
requiremcnts. The specifications will i,nclude the project clescriptinn, saruple bid form, sample bond
~ form, wage rates, contracior's notes, spccial provisions, a,nd othcr documents as necessary.
. .
4.9 Preliminary Owner Contacts . • Although right-of-way acquisition is - anticipated to be requirecl Erom fewer than ten propcrty owners,
DEA will coutact all praper.ty owners a.long lhe co.rridor (approxunately fifty-seven) to disciiss desigu
feahires which may affect them. It is li.kely that Right-o;f Fntry agreemcnts will be reyuired frorn a
significaut ntunber of these propcrty owners. DEA will discuss perpetuation of fences; lncakion oF
. appraaches, protection of existitig facilities (such as utilities), ueccssary tempordry constructian
easements, possible peraianent-right-of=way acquisitions, etc.; NviFh the property owuers, and wil1 log the conversatians for the project file. . 4.90 Preliminary Utility Cooidination
DEA will route two sets o£ preliminary plans and a cover letter to appropriate utilities, mtuucipalities
(i.e., Spokane Cowi ty Division ofi iJtilities), and ottier intE7esled pairties for review and conunent. . DEA .
will- also coordinatc• with-- the utility- companies to design retocation plans for- their facilities where
appropriate. Cost estimates for eliminatuig or relocatiiig facilities will also be developecl. :Each ulility
.
aad/or iuunicipality is expected to return ane p.l3u Nvith their propased changes shown.
4.91 Preliminary Design Submittal , . The submittal package at Preli,mi.nary Design shall i.nclude:
• Preli.minary roadwayplans
. • k'relimi.nary traffic signal and illtuiunation plans '
• Preliminary stormwater plans, Evitli report
• preliminary irrigalion plans
• Preluninary traf_f_ic control plans .
• Pi-elimin.a.ry opinion-ofprobab.lecost Applmaypvenus Scope of Work
Wdribo/Appleway Scope.doc Page 4 of 9
• J
. • :Preliminary spccificatioiLS ,
Ttus task covers the effort necessary to coordinate the i.ndividual plan sections into a cohcsivc plan sct,
plot all'drawings, re<<iew the drawi.ngs .f.o.r cansistency and couipleteness, ancl dEliver the package to the
Ciry. .
4.12 Aftend Preliminary Design Review Meeting DEA's 17esigia Team and City represcntatives will attend the Freliminary besign Review nteetiiig to
. review the City's cornments on ttic prelitninary design set.
4.13 Public Open House 7n_ cooperation with the City, DEA will host one open house to allow the public to view the pzeliminaty
plans fo.r the road improvements_ DEA will advcrtise the heaeing, larepare antl ciistribute mailings, and
make arrangemEnts for meeting place and time. The DEA design tcam will then attend the open house,
dcvelop a«n-itten summary af issues and concerns, and distribute the materials to interestcd partics.
. S. FINAL DESIGN
5.1 -Prepare Final Roadway Design Plahs . .
I7EA will clevelop final roadtivay plans illustrating the proPosed horizontal and vertical aliguneut for -
A.ppleway Avenue, based ou coinnieuts received fr4m the City and property ownezs. Jn additi.on, fiiiall, ,
. interscction plans for T..oug, Ctiree.nacres, Cnzbin Place, Barkcr, aud Nlichigaai Nvill be prepared fo illustrale
the detailed horizontal and vertical layout of each intersection. 5.2 Prepare Fina/ Trafific Signal and.!llumination Plans '
DEA tivill prcparc the final desigu for the tra ,ffic signal far the intersectioii of :Barker Road, including
signal beads, mast am-is, appurtenances, and electrica.l wiri.ng. Q. final design for the illtuniuation system _
at the new sigaatized interseetion will also bc developeci. Aclditionally; the final designfor the layout of
the conduit and juncti.on box system will be preparcd. .
- 5.3 Prepare Final Stormwater Plans and Reporf
DEA will dcvelop final storm«+ater pIans illustrating the locations o£.grasseci infiltration areas that may
be-required tio augnent the lincar intiltration swale.s. A techriieal report summarizing the ftnal treataneiLit
and clisposal calculatious wil_l also- be Pr.eparecl. 5.4 Prepare Final Irrigation Plans DEA will develop final irrigation plans for the grassed in:rltration areas. The points of connection and
mctering requiremenfs will be coordinated Nvith the local cvater district, and'equipinent recluirements will
be coordinated with the City.
. 5.5 Prepare Final Traffi-c Control Plans .
DEA will prepare .fiual permanent traffic control plans that Nvill includc deluleation, signing, iiecessaty
illlunination, and pavement markings c:lepieting circulation. .
5.6 Calculate Final Quanfities Final roaciway quantitiES for ttic projECt compoia.ent•s will be determined by llEA. .
ApplewayAvenue Scope of Work •
K/dw@o/Appfetivay Scope.doc • !'age 5 af 9
5.7 Final Opinion of Probable Cost
A final- opi.niou of ptnbablc cost will Uc developed by DEA wafh i.nput fram the City followi.ng
preparafiion of a.ll Final T)esigi plans.
5.8 Final Specifications
DEA «rill prepare fiual specifications for the project in accorciance with the most cuLrent 'WSDpT
requireznents. Thc s-pecifications will i.uclucie the project description, sample bid forni, sample bond
form, wage r.ates, contractor's notes, special ptovisions, and alher documents as necessary.
5.9 Final Ufility Coordinafion
DEA Nvill route t'inal plans to the utilities identified during prelinu.nary design. DEA will'work with each
of the utility providcrs to cvorciiuatc the layout of the utilities with the road iuiprovernents, aud to
coordinate canstruction phasing/scheduliug issues. 5.10 Final Ufility Plans Based on the rElocation designs obtainecl from the utility providers, ~.7:FA Nvill illustrate the proposed
rclocations on tlie fiual road plans. 17EA will eoordinate with utility companies tn deterniine the costs of
any relocations, as well as the entity xesponsiUle for the cost,s of the relocatiotis. In addition, DEA will
assist the City with the necessary ag•reeinents for the relocations. 5.11 Progress Review Meeting
L7EA and the City engineers will meet to ciiscuss project issues related to the final plans, cpnstruction schedule, and bidciing. 5.12 Final Design Submittal _ ' .
tiViLh appropriatc City and subcbnsultant input, the subulittal package at Fiiial laesign shall include:
• Fiual roadway plans '
• k'inal traffic signal and itlunuuation plans . • Final storrr►water plans, with report
• Final irrigat,ion plans . '
• Pinal traffic control platis • Fi.nal opiuion ofprobable cost • Final specifications .
This task covers the cffort necessary to coorclinale the inciividual plan sections i.n.to a cohesive plan set,
plot all drawings, review the clrawings fQr consistcncy and camp.l.eteness, and deliver the package to the
City. •
5.93 Aftend Final Design Review Meetrng DEA's Design I'eam anci City represcntatives Nvill attend the Einal Design Review meeting to review the
City's couunents on the fina1 design set: .
~ .
Appleway Avenue Scope of Work
K/dwboJAp,ofeway Scope.doc ' Page 6 of 9
5.14 PS&E Submittal
The projecl plans and proposal will be revised to reilcct ttie coinments made at the Final Dcsigu Rev7ew
iVleeti.n~. tl thorough Quality Assurance Revicw «ill be cc~r~ducted by DEA at this time, and a
comparison between right-of-way plans and construcfion Plans Nvill Ue performed:.
5.15 Projecf Proposal Package .
With input from the geotecluucal subconsultant ,and City engineers, DEA will prepare the project
proposal pack.age includ'uig the J?S&E infonnation sheet, a consh-ucrion schedule, special, provisivns,
contractor's notes, and specification ainenclments.
6. BIDDING 6.1 Prepare Bid Documents for Distribution
DEA Nvil l prepare up to thirty sets of the PS&E package £or distribution dtuing tlie bidding period. Plans
will be made ava.ilaUle to the contractors at flle DEA office, and adclitional k'S&E sets ~Nill be distributed
to the local plan centers.
6.2 Prepare Bid Advertisement
'17EA wil.l develop the bid adveztisement for the project -and publish it up to a maximum bf thrce times ui
up to fivE publications. ' .
. 6.3 Conduct Pre-Bid Conference '
DEA. -vvill sehcdulE azid conciuct one pre-bid couference #'or the project.
6.4 Respond to Questions and /ssue Bid Addenda .
- DEA will responci to cantraetor questions and issue bid addencia during the bid period as required: The
issuance of addenda will be tracked and addcnda aclmowletigement fonns will be ciistributcd to official
plan holders. 6.5 Bid Opening DEA will open bi.d5 at the appoiuted ti.n-le ancl place, and tabulate the prcluniuazy results far public
distribution. 6.6 Bid Evaluation
DEA will evaluatie all bids to confinn responsivencss, and make a recomineudation ta the City for award
oFthe coutracf. • 6.7 Assistance for City/Contractor Contract .
DEA will assist i:he City aiid Conuaclor as ncccssary to facilitate ihc finalization of the construction
. con.tract bcriN,*eeu flie two parties. Under tbis task, DEA will provide thc Conhactor with: the electranic
design files necded to set uP the constniction stak:ing f les (wtuch «Till be the contractor's responsibility).
RppletiiayA ienue , Scope of Work
K/d;vhca/Appleway Scope.doc Page 7 of 9
~ •
7. RIGHT-OF-WAY ESTINIATE
7.9 Review of R/W Retracement Survey ahd Supporting Documents
A reLracemeirt survey of the existing riglits-of-way for the pmject corridor is being conducteti by another
Latid Survey consultant. It is our understandi.ng that this survey is to delineatc the exasting land
baundaries and provide a basis for the developmcnt of'the proposed right-of way plans. Ih particular, we
uiidErstand that this survey «Il accuratcly retrace the rights-of way fnr A.ppleway Avenue, the fonner
Chicago, vlilwaukee auci St. Paul Rai.Lroad right-of-way, and intersectiug streets, as well as establish the
existing adjoiuing ownership lines. We also w.lderstand that this survey will be rcferenced to the
Washinglan State pla.nc Coordinate System.
'C'he City of Spokane Valley Nvill provide bLA witti the final suivey dra,~ving and the associated electronic
files, along with hard copies of all supporting doctuneiitsJor our reNiew. These doctunents will i.nclude
the righC-o.f-way plans and deeds for the rights-of-way and the vesting deed for the adj oini.ng land parcels.
Tt will also inclucie the ira.f.oiniation on the metliociology and moniunents ut7lized.to re.f.erence the project
to the Washington State Planc Coordinate S}-stem. Tt is ass-Luneci that this ci.rawing will be in aeeor.dance
• with the City of Spokane Valley cad sta,udards. •
DEA Mll review all documents for stutability for the proposed right-of jvay plan preparation. T,n
addition, DEA will perfonn a lirnited fielci verification of the retYacenient survey. ror purposes of ttus
• scope, it is assumed that eight hours or less n£a two mai survey cretiv will be zequired for tlus tas.k. It is
alsa wisunied that no significant title issues will be discovered by the rctracernent sucvey.
7.2 Right-of-Way Plan (Preliminary) '
Tt is rccognizeci that design elements and negotiation clements NVill be dynanic and interrelaied'in naturc.
M Initial IZight-of-Way plan will be developeci by DFA as ttie prcl.imi.nary raaciway ciesign beeomes
substantially developecl. "f}us plan will be based on the Right-of-Way 12.etiacement Surveji and on
preliminary clesign plans. It will be developed to the extent necessary to allow for subrnittal and approval by V4'S.DOT. 'No title reports will be orderecl or reviewed at tlus stcp. Tt is anticipated that this plan will '
. also be used to support acc{uisition negotiations. As negotiations become campleted this plan will be
developed into a fwal plan set, dEtailing fuial acquisitians, as discussed in the !2/1VV Scope ofi Services.
7.3 Preparationof Draft "Summary of Offer" Documents ' DBA wi1T'cooidid'atc with the City ou detcrmiriatian of, just coiupensation for eacH acquisition; ancl will
prepare a draffi "Surzin--tary of Offer" far-each parcel. I`hese sunimanies will lie fon<arded to the City for
revie-w and coiutnent. '
7.4 Preparation of True Cost Esfimafe
Following appraisal of the acquisi.linii parcels, ]7EA sliall complete a Tnec Cost Eslimxtie (Appenciix
. 25::144 of the LAG Manual) far the projcct. The True Cost Estimate shall take into consideration the
values developed unclex Task 7.4. 7.5 Prep.aration of LocalAgency Agreement Supplement ` Based upoii the True Cost Estimate, JaEA will przpare t}ie Local Agency Agreement Supple.ment for the
TZIW acquisition. phase. ' -
Applesvaykrenue Scope of Work
K/dwba/,4ppleway Scope.doc Page 8 of 9
. J
i\
- 7.6 Submittal to WSDOT Region Loca/ Programs Engineer
TaEFI will submit the True Cost Estimatc, Right of Way Plan, Local Agency Agreemeut Supplement, and
supportuig docuincntatiou to the WSUOT Region. T.,oca] Prograrns Eugincer for revievv and approva,(.
Upon appr.oval of the package, Fetleral fiunds Por RIW acqlusition will be eligible to be released.
ADDITIONAL SERVICES ,
The follnwing additional services will he performed if necESSary. f1 written supplemental agreeuient will
be executcd prior to iniriating this work. . " • Public meetuigs in addition to those stated in the scope of work.
• Fnvi.ronmental fasks iucluding wetlanci cielineation, envi.ronmental midgation ar biologieal surveys.
• Design oi'the loeal public roads outside of the intersectioty arcas. . • Addifional survey.f.or elevations or.f.eatures not captured by the City in the base maps. '
•Sigual warrant analysis, signal dcsign, or speed studies in addition to those listed above.
ApplQwayAvenue - ' Scope of Work
Wilwbo%1ppleway Scops.doc Pays 9 of9
f ~ ciry otspcl/--""lloy
APPLEYJAY AVENUI'~ ~`DVEPlEN73 '
Estliiwted Fees
T . . . '
6sti~U' r • i - . r' ~ • ti '.4",t f~ti~w~`~' ' ~ _'6 -1 d - v~
t~. Tc~ani-~ 'aR
Rai. ` rMZr ~ an P•! :iiTl, M lii k. ll n v~l~mn~] ~M>u i:lssr~ `417,tA-'r
S32•`•0 2i0U t3.9.W f9~100 ,••52225 $17..P6 ~iln • l~fr :~i[e at •4s It .~..c ~ A~~f
t. IAn16Ci AEiHrq7MT10.Y
~ J14..50' $21.75 $21.25 SlZGO d57.pp S47,00
j~~,q~ "LQD SZ0.00 SZ'L00 S3 3 A Q f9J.W SiAOQ
M R v' 1 tlm~a7a~hi~ ' 4U AO
' t.s 1rnukhu-o aLmw rtKm 8.n . ~
S~ssf-H:ua Bl 0.0 Sd,O PA 44 4,0
raa.I o.o oa~ ao ao aa 4n 4.0 a an ao an on 0.0 . PROlPCTNRlS1i0.! p u St. " S~ SO i0 So .L7 Sa tt1 29D SO JO ~ i~
2.1 eiu d. taFba LO SU !0 fl1 SO i7
1.2 AiL han CIJ'CAU Utiha 1U 4.Gy 9. J
' 2] OU}'.kMn7tMN Zia M 2.0
1.0 4.0 tC4WhHVa 39L 1.0 . &U lgp 1.0 ~.0 :A
s~on.w.t::ra ig.go ~ oA nL~ 0.0 QO s.o tA 6.0 ao tn
l, ariEeenieu F290 TJ73. S39 f0 ' f0 f0 JD S?9 f3t iid !p 0'a Q.0 DA tfi U 0.0 QO
S1 /mpo O.~nn~m~,dv 9i) ~ SO i0 t72 SO jp so
7.t I~I~iN~oCMxn l.p &0
9J 1'Id'-a1 ~crwa ~tl se:.,O 77a,,, zux oe an i_.o 00 0.0 or ao ao ao oa au ao o.o no o,o om u.
, „03 nJo to uao a+s~ So So so. s,~ zg 0.u o.o an
iRElDitINARY~T.N
PjePUnR~ct~ayne:ruy4u3n J~ D TO SO
SO t7 SO f0 i0 DO JO tp
♦.t e
4.m~eP"~ 'haryanYU .~Wn71 20A 120A
2 n. _
1. hatirs
Fl'w ~ {+a~eiurymrrr~.vlt~
~J rOictwt AO 21.U - 2U 6.9 aic :A.D 2flA
. aA petzknr YWrkn~p:f 2.0
4AO
a.G iheppatrt►u.j yvLt op~yp~ Fp~n 4.D i0A
~.a emcWiep~.in
o- vRamuy c%*an a
4.7 ~Wue lL.l
4a P~a-,4~ n N7cmivn Bfi 2 t.U S.0 1.6 :tA 1.0
~A PrMrhzywxrean~.. t0 1Q0 40 2A 2A 2A ~p
4.10 ~+rc4e1~M ooaSeutm 4.0 1219 '
1.11 1"rioh C n3WnWl t,p 2.0 8A
Ataatl RnR1wy Wqpn Rev.e«
~r
4AZ uPam ee~~ 4.1)
4.U OOeaNmse eD t20 4.0 '
Sw~x.f-umn Qn. 10.0 Y0.0 '..5.0 ( 120 4.0
3ansrtar- r+rA ~ Si PM $71 } l2475• ir a00 JD fU $0 D~ ' 1A 9.4 f.0 2.0 0.0 8.0 40A 23.0 20 0.0 U.C Q~j
S.:KOfiSiCN iW SN 11Af t3A'! S971i 12.210 • frza $II fb SD jp
6.i Prcao:e~aiw0.ura Um WA f2UA
~ ~ao Md ~nc Wetl u~r_
u'~Y h'rhai6n cUU ~ .
Iiq~reft~L~n„ranr^~'xq GO 70A ~QO C0.0 33.0 6,0
&0 N,0
' rofYW b~turo 20 tL 20
6AMwnlhilort'ee~4d 1h~ AO 24.9 CO.O
6A Glwbf~ thal ~uarJtq Y,0 6.0 20 '
6.7 Rcftw ~~OOhi.i d Vro~nde Ce.! 8A ae ~n ~d.p.;zauon, 24n
~ ~a'm~~b~t tlm OA t0.0 4.0
~.O
~,1D Uib a ?,.Q 120
E.11 V R4! ~v+4r I~<p{y~ .~u
9.t:7 stOeal~nB~RS~Ca1 6D 8Q AO Qi3 AIrn~ iaUl Dcahta un/a.•tACCtip 20 20 '~•0
4ta a~sES=cn:ai ' 4.0 AU 24,0 Sts Pvale•iHows~IMc . 4.0 12U A.9 IA 1<A E~0 nA 2A
120 1T6.0 tW.O UA 0.9 p~. 4A
SwoM-Tn:~S i:$B;;S =!>4 f$fAp flO,Opp m 0.U 0.U ri1.0 tA 7A.9 7A 17.0 aCf.l 0.t,0 GUA O.p 0.9 pA 0
~ ro ~ 57917 fYf i22a f,Ya i7t~ ftC~a f?,dr6 7,(tpD ftM . ~ ~ ~
:L•1:pW ' .
lat,106'°' - DAV[D EVANS AND AS50(IATES, INC. -
' P.P. f
. ' ~
~ City oiSpokano Vallary ,
AAPL£'Nr1YAVENUC• IGIYROVELIENTS -
Estlmated Fee's
3, ' -
w ~'t ' J"4 •a (1
F~h ~CNC+~IR-vl'.~.~( t - , i.n
d32yj ur-~
rra. to;l ~ ~ ~ ~,.~"rmmur .sJf c a r~a 9~~ ~ • ~ G ~ anA nif ~ ~N ~VH ~P . a ~ ~i ~J',~~" _7 5 ~ ~ l~ ~
. Rstr e~hb~r J1V.G0 f9.S~0 fJJ.00 f29.Q) S?2.2i ifA25 2.00
4 ~OtNO
f/t.6U JM.T5 342._'O iC1JID S4'L00 i32O7
F? J38.QJ • f~M ' 00 • f7b!V .i20.G7
41 Raia+Ktlao~mena~xChlIIUf~n 4.0 AO
82 4 n eb
uJ Caro~irr.mf oenfs- qA 20 Z'
~UV.atlbaa~n06aue .
0A uN«da t0A 16.0
OL dC Opecir~ 9A ~ aA 0.0
00
~1 MIn7m lA 04 4,0RA
O.ThtsbitelvC~C~c~.m[mf-~:f IIA . 4.0 '
:a~Ua5f.lMaf 1f0. 2A 4BAJ $~O i f0 SO 0.0 0.0 Of 120 UR OA QO U.~ 90 00 QD
1. rt OA QO..
tL!hw-7aats i}15 S7G E15'a] SU SD 7II S!W 80 1:57 SD JJ tY24 t0 i'J
lG1[T-0FWAYE41VMfC SO YJ
7.1, w.w.av.rA,o O.W.
au in o. e.o
7A R•vPW~Nsurl~:/I 1& BO AU
Pia:ssLa u th~fl `SCrtmary n1 OYa' 40.0 u .
T.A D.u 1
' 7.4. ✓n~foatl7nwCqstEcti:a~. pLy {QO 401! 2.9
~ ~ U~lApecift1Oe-i 1.0 8A 20
7.8. SuLdene~t ~
Tn. suarRUlw'n.OT zZI 1.0 ?,0
3soa.w- ~ 2it. OA H lA
tL itatal-7.zfa i'609 SO i293 JO t 2Q t231 SiYJ S.fift' SB9 Ll0 n ZO OR8 OA 0 0.0 QO 0. 510
7 ~tl 1 4
0TA4NOUR5 • Z iD SO 5.2.5 jl1 SO 0 ,3N SRYJ
TaT~ DA 310 JOXO 7JlA .RT,y B.0 fl0 0.0 4ItD M j0 jp $1,749 j)
tffAl 9.0 RA 2101 d'L ~.0 1290 94,0 11.0 ~,7.0 4fl0 10.0
f5470ll L78]0 l/1 0?J iT7 6 ft_9 YA/ iT9 S9pa fu80 ]_B7 fl9i $SOB ftEB St,SH $2,226 096 {2032 f212 f049S1341 SI70
oae~crm _r»> se ei
ox.r..Pmi ti Ta
f7G'6G2
4a R~~
.T~s~e1 Cd.D`/aIdYLMtea~mli'MI SaOCI
WtiKCf L100
~ • ' 5250
TML erns ai eutar Si 5D
wssuaMreunsr. atd.a a ~pp
N• I3OPS6Eeai. SY,000
LA9 W
- I ~E4 I
S' L4i~zi ry,:TECi•f.EES ' " M~
~
i w¢n4s .
roa..a~ ram icetc~r • .
, qAYID EYAh3 AkD A330CIATE^u, IItC. Z
- .
.
Exhibit C-Electronic Exchange of Engineering and Other Data
r. Surveyui#, Road~~lay Desigu; and Flans Preparation Section
A.- Survey 17ata - Suivey point data sllall be in ASC.T.T. f.oimat. Elcctron.ic dza«rings sha.ll have all
breal:lines and linewor.k completed prior to delivery to DaN~ci Evans and Assaciates, :Cuc. (DEt1.). -
1liE drawing platform shall be AutoCad LDDT 2005.
B. Agency's Right to Rcview ProcIuct with Consultant - lhe City of Spolran.e Valley shall IZave the right fo i.nspECt all hardcopy and clectranac files at any tirne. C. Electronie Delivcrables - DEA shal.l deliver all roaciway desip and R!W electxonic filcs lo tb.e
City at l•he concltisian ok'the desip.
D. Agency Furnished Sec-«ces and Tnformatiou - The Ciry shall furnish to :QEA iri clectrouic
format: ihe cxisting R/W znap, and the l•vpographic survey of the existing surfaces. The City shall
also fitrnish to D:E~,.A thc i7nal. ;eotechnical repc>rt, Nvluch shall include recommendafiions far
paveuieut design and storlnwater disposaL II. Methods to .Clccironically Ex.c}xangc Dala '
A. File '['ransfer Format - All drawin~; f les N~rill be prEpared and kr;~usferred to the City i.n AutoCatl
L'D'DT 2005 forniat. tln ftp, site accessible hy City persoiuiel shall he established to facilitate fire
~ transfcrs.
.
AppleivayAtfenUe Exhibit C
fVdta,bo/Appleway Scope.doc - Pare 1 of 9
Exhibit D-2 , - ~
,
Payment (Cost Plus a Fixed Fee)
The CONSiJf.,T.-'1NT shall be paid by the AGENCX for com,pleted work and services ren.ciered under Chis
AGREFMENT as provided hereinafter. Sucli payinent shall be fiill compensation for work performed or services
rendered aud for a(l labor, materials, supplies, equipmene, imd incidentals necessary to car.x~p.lete the work specified
in Section II, "Scope of lVbrk." The CpNSUf TANI' s}ial] conform to all applicable poi-fions oF48 CFR Part 31.
A. tlctual Costs: Paymcnt for all consulting services for this PROJECT shall be on the b3sis of the
C0NSUL"I'AN'r'S actual cost plus a fixeci fee. The actual eost shall iucludc ctirect salary cost,
ovencead, direct non-salary coSis, and fixed Eee.
1. D'uect Salary Cosis: The Direct Salary Cost is ilie dircct salary paid to principals,
professional, tecbn.ical, wid clerical pczsonnel for the time they are productively
engaged in wortt necc;ssziry to fulfill the t:emis of fhis AGREEMEv'I'. The
COVS1Tr TE1NT shall ma.intaiu support clata to verify the cjirect salary cc,sts billed
to thc r1GFiVC1`. -
2. Ovcrheaci Costs: Overhead Costs are those costs ottier ihan direct costs, which are
included as s«ch on the booksof the CpNSUJ.1lUNT in the normal everyday
keepirig oCits books. Progress payments shall be made at tlie raeEShowii ui [}le
headi.ng of this N1.GREEMTN"C under "Over}ic:id Progress Payment ltate." Total overliead paymentshall Ue based on tlie methocl shoNvn in the hcadi:ng of the ,
AGR-F.EM.FN'C. The hwo Qptions are explaincd as follows:
a_ Fixed Rate: Ifthis method is uldicaccd in the heading o:Ckhe AGREEIM.FNT the
_ f1GEiVCY agrees to rei.mbtuse the CQNSUJ:,TANT for ovcrhead at'the pere.en.tage
rate showci. '1'his rite stk111 r1ot change duiiug the life af the AGRLF--"M.*r'NT.
b.' Actua] Cost: .CEthi,s mettioci is inciicated 'ui thc heitcling of the AGFt:!-~:~MEN'T the AGENCY agrees to reimburse the CONSULTA,'V7' the aatusl overhead costs
verified by autiit, up to the Vlaximtun Total Amount Payable, authorized under this
. AGItEEV1EN.f, when accwniilated with ail othcr A.cl•ual Costs. A. summary of Ehe CONSULT_A!\'TS cost estimafe and the overhead computation
is stiown. in Exliibit "T" attiiched hereto and by this reference made part oF chis
E1GREE MT'vT. When an AcGUa! Cost met}iod is used, the CO\TS 1,7r TAI\1'I' (prirne
tind all sub-eonsultants) Nvill subrri.ic to the ACENCY Within six (6) mrmths after
the end of eacli fiirm's fiscal }Tear, an overhead schedule in the format required by ehe AGENCY (cost category, dollar. expendihu-es, etc.) :for the ptirpc>se of
acijustiug the overh.cad ratz for billing perrposes. It shall bc u5ed for the
computation of prdgrzss payments cluring the fbllowing yearand for retmactively adjusdng ihe previous year's overhead cost to reflucl the actual rate. .
DOT Focin 140-089 EF Exhibif D-2 ReAssd 6/fF5
Failure to supply tlais information by eithe.r the prim.e COVSULTANT or any oF their
sub-consultants shall cause the AG.FNCY to wit.hhold payment of the billeci overhead
costs iuitil such time as the required 'uiformation is received and an overhead rate for
bi.lling purpqse;s is approved. -
7'he AGENCY, STATE andlor the Federal Govemment may perform an audit of the
COIVSL7LTANT'S books ancln:cords at auy tune ciuring regular business hours to
deteruiine the actual overhead rate, if tttey so desire. .
3. Di.rect Notz-Salary CosLs: Direct IeTon-Salary Losts wi.ll ba reiinbursed at the Actual Cost
to the CONSTJI-Tt1NT. These charges may incltade, but are not lim.ited to, ttic following
iterns: trivel, pri.niang, Iong ciistauce telephone, supplies, coraputer charges and fees of
' sub-consultants. A_ir or tiain travel will be reunbursed oiily lo economy c:lass levels
•u.uless ot}ECrwise apprnved by the AGLNCI'. The C'UNSULT.aNT sha.ll comply with the
niles and regulations regatding travel costs (eac2uding au, trairi, an(! reiital eai costs) in
accordatlce wirh the AGENCX'S Travel R.ules and Pmcedure,s. However, ai_r, train, and
rental car costs shall be reimbtizsed in accordance wich 48 Code of:hederal Regulations
(CFR) Pare 31.205-46 "'fravel Gosts." The billiug for lairect Non-Sa(ary Costs shall
inc2ude an ir.emized list7ng of the charge,s directly identifi<<ble with the :l'RO.TEC1. The
Cdi\jSUL.TANT shall maiutsin th_e on&ial supporting doeuments iri their ofFice. Copies
of the origuial supporting documents shall be supplied to the AUE\'CY upon request.
. All above cliarges must be nECessacy for the servicc;,s provided uncler this ACREENIENT.
' 4. Fited Fee: 7:he Fixed kee, which represenfs the CONSUf 'i~~iT'S profit, is shoNvn in the
~ hcacling of this AGRE~MENT under fixed ree. This ainount does not incIude-any
adciitional Fixeci ree, wh. ich could be authorizcd from die Rlanagement Reserve Ftmd.
T}us fee is b<ised ou the Scope of Woric defincd in tlus AGRFEMENT and the estimatecl
person-hours required to perforrn the stated Scope of Woclc. In flie event the
CONSULTAN1' enters into a supplemental A.GI7EEME NTfor additional work, the
supplemental AGREEMENT inay include pmvisions fqr che added costs and an
appropriate additional fec;. 'I'he Fixecl Fee will be prorated an.ci plid moritwy in '
proportion to the percentage of work completed by the CONSUL°l'E1.N'T ari(1 reported in .
the Monthly.Progress .Repotts accompanying the billings: lliy porcion of the FiYed Pee riirned but riot previausly ptid in the progress payvients wil_l be coverul in the (initl
pa}nient, subject to the provisions of Section ,TY entitled "Tcrmi.nation of Agreemcnt:"
5. Management Reserve Puaicl: The AGF\jCY IIisy dcs.ire to establish a vlanagement.R.eserve _ Fuud to provicle the Ao c;ment Aciministrator with the flexibility to authorize adclitional •
funtis to the ACt}7:FFMCN'1' for flllocvable imforescen costs, pr reimUursing the
' COVSLJLTAN7' for. additiontd work beyond that already definecl in r.his t1GMEEivitv'C.
Such auihorization(s) shall be in %izitmg and sha,ll not cxcf:ed the lessez of $100,000 or
• 10% of the Totiil Amouut Authoriied as shown in the headin, of this AG:F2:EEMEN"['.
Ttae amoiint uiclucted for die ManagecT2ent Reserve k'unct is showri i.n. the headi.ng of this
AGR.F,,FMENT. Titis fimd may not be replenislaed. Any clkinges requiring additional
. costs in excess oFthe Management Reserve Fund shall be made in ac;cordanee with
Sc;ction YIV, "Ertra 'A"ork."
~
6. i'ylvcunwn Total A.mount Payable: T1ie Maximum Total Amotwt Payable by the
AGb'~ICY to the CONISUrL,TAN'i" under ihis AGREENNN1' shall not exceed the amotuit
shown in the heiiding of this AGR]:EnENT. The Maxiirium Toca.L Amount Fayable is
comnrised of the Total Amount .AuthUrized, and the Vtanagemene Reserve Fur►d. The ~
'Maxa.mum Tat31Amotuit Payable does not include paytncnt for Extra Work as stipuliLted
in Seetion X1V, "Extra Wor3c." No minimum amount payable is guaranteed untier ttus
AGRJ3FIvIF..N1'.
B. Nton[hly Progress Faymencs: The CONSITLTA.iv[' rnay sub.mit billings to the AGEINCY for
reirnvursemcnt oftlctua1 Costsplus cFte caleulated overhead and fee on a moclthly basi's duri.ug the
progress of the work. Such billings shall be in a fnrmat appc•oved by Lhe AGEVCY an.d acc;omgauied
by the monthly progress repor.is required iuider Sf;ction 17I, "Geueral Requirements" of :tiis
AGRIMFKFN71. The billings wilt be supported by an iccmized lisiing for each item i.ncludi.ng.Direct
SalFUy, lairect NTon-Salary, and ailowable Oveiliead CnsLs to which will bc aclded the proratecl hixed
Fee.1'o provicie a means of verifying the billed salary costs for CONSUT.,T~1.~"1' employees, the
AGENCY may contluct employee interviews. These interviews may consist of recording the riames, '
titles, salary raies, and present duties of those employecs perfomung work on the PROJECT at the
time of the iritsrview.
C. k'inal 1'iryment: riiial Payment of auy balancc ctue the CONSTJT.,1'ANT of the gross amotmt earnecl
will be rrlade promptly upon its verification by the AGEI~TCY after the co.mpletion ofthe work tuider
this AGREENf_FiVT, cnntinoent upou receipt of all PS&F_, plans, uiaps, notes, reports, eleckronic data
- .tncl other related documGnta wliich aee required to be fiutiiished under tius AGRF_.EMENT.
Ar,ec;pGi.nce of such Final Payment by the CONSULTANT shaU contiritute a re]ease of all claims.for
payment, which the C0NSU1:,'Ct•LNT may have against the AGENCY unless such clai:ms are specifc;ally reserved in writing and transnvfted to the EIGENCY by the CONSULTANT prior to its
accA:ptauce. Said Final Paycrienc shall not, hawevec, be a bar to any claims that the ACE\TCY may '
havi: agitinst the CONSLTLTrINT or to any remedjes t:he AGENCY may pursue wiih re;spect to sucli clai:rns. 'fhe payment of any billing wiIl not constituee agreeIIieut as to the appropriateiiess of any itsui alid at
LttC L7CCI.E ()f f1IIal HUCIlt, alI requi.r.ed adjustmenis will be made and reflccCed in a fmal p3yrnent. In the
. event that such fmal audit reveals aiz ove:rpayment to the CONSUY..TAN'C, t}ic COiINSLJLTANT will
refund such ovcrpayment to the AGIFNCY witlun thirty (30) ciays of uotice of ehe overpayment. Sucll
refiuid shall noe constitute awaiver by the CONSLTLTANTfor any claiin,s nelating to the validity of a finc3ing by the AGMSFCY of'overpayinerit. 'Che CONISLTLTAN'1' has twen'ry (20) days after receipt o.f the rnal :PUST AUDTT. tu begin the appeal process to the AGENG'Y for audit findings.
D. Iuspection ofCost Records: The CONSUT,TAN'I` ancl thea sub-consultants shall keep available for
inspection by representatives of t}ie A.GENCY, STATT ancl the United SiaCC^,, for a period uf ehre,e
(3)'"y'ears after receipt uf f.nal pa}nient; the cost records and acc;ountti pertliaing to tFFit
AGRFEMEvT ajid all iterris rel<<ted to or bearing upon these records with the foilowi.ng exception if
any litigation, ciaim or auclit mising our of, i_n eonnection with, or rciiieed to dus contract is initiated
before the expiration of ttte three (3) year pcriod, the cost records and accotmts sliall be retvned witil
such litigarion, clai.r.n, or auclit uivolving the records is compiteted.
.
EXHIBIT E-1
CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION - SUMMARY SHEET
(LUMP SUM, COST PLUS FIXED FEE, COST PER UNIT OF WORK)
PROJECT: Appleway Avenue Reconstruction
DIRECT SALARY COST (DSC): Classification Man Hours Rate = Cost
QA/QC 33.0 x • $ 39.50 $ 1,303.50
Project Manager 367,0 x $ 32.50 $ 11,927.50
Design Technician ' 707.0 x $ 25.00 $ 17,675.00 _
Professional Land Surveyor 33.0 x $ 33.00 $ 1,089.00
Survey Coordinator . 9.0 x $ 26.00 $ 234.00
. Survey Party Chief 8.0 x $ 22.25 178.00
Suniey Instrument Person 8.0 x $ 19.25 $ 154.00
Survey Technician . 40.0 x $ 14,50 $ 580.00
Landscape Designer 141.0 x , $ 21.75 $ 3,066.75
Administrative Assistant 9.0 x $ 21.25 $ 191.25
Administrative Assistant 47.0 , x $ 12.50 $ 587.50
Traffic QA/QC 9.0 x $ 52.00 ; $ 468.00 _ Project Manager 32.0 x $ 42.00 $ 1,344.00
_ Sr.7raffic.Engineer. 53.0 x $ 42.00 $ 2,226.00
Traffic Engineer 128.0 x $ 32.00 $ 4,096.00 .
_ CAD Technician 94.0 . x $ 28.00 $ 2,632.00
~ Administrative Assistant 11.0 " x $ 22.00 ? -242.00 Sr. Property Specialist 53.0 x $ 33.00 $ 1,749.00
Praperty Coordinator 48.0 x $ 28.00 $ 1,344.00
Administrative Assistant 10.0 x ' $ 20.00 200.00
1840.0 TOTAL DSC = $ 51,287.50
OVERHEAD (OH COST - including Salary Additives): .
OH Rafe x DSC of 173.32% X$ 51,287;50 = $ 88,891.50
FIXED FEE (FF): , .
FF Rate x DSC or 29.00°/a X$ 51,287.50 = $14,873.38
REIMBURSABLES: . •
Travel (one site visit for traffic signal PM) _ . S 300.00
Traffic counts at Barker _ $ 750.00
Speed sfudy for Barker signal design = $ - 200.00 'Deliveries $ 400.00
. , Mifsage $ 250.00
Reprographics (30 PS&E sets) 2•,000.00
• Total = Expenses $ 3,900.00
SUBCONSULTANT COSTS
Total - Subconsultants ~ -
GRAND TOTAL $ 158,952.37
Prepared by: Date: 11/8/2005
DflT Form 54M89 EF Exhibif E-t Revised 6105
.
Exhibit F
Breakdovvn of Qverhead Cost -
David Evans and Associates, In.c.
2005 Provisional FAR Overhead Rate**
, Endirect Labor $ ~ 13,274,137 . .
_ Labor Burden , 17,593,957
Administrative Expenses
Pub[ic Relations Expense
Se!(ing Expense 229,833 . .
occupancy . ~ 6,840,213
Comrnurslcations 1,054,530 • '
~ . ~ Supplies " 1,848,229
Publica@ons and Memberships 2685.r~ .
Computer and Printer Costs ~ • 1.256,894
. Vehicle Expenses ~ 1,055,500 •
GeneialAdministraiivo • • 631,516
Training Expsnses - 728,1$9• .
' Employee Recru[tfng and Retention ' 352,635 ~ -
Professianaf Servfces 1,616,069 , • ~
• ~ ' Business Insurance ~ ' . 1,187,919
7axes, Ucensss and Fees 500,608 .
aepreaa6on andAmorfizatifln 1,350;433' . ~
~ Bad Debt Expenses
Contributions ~ ~ ~ ' •
• Wtiscellarteous Expenses • 165 -
409 K and ESOP Confrfbttfdans ' 962,698
- Profif Sharing Expenses 1,210,470
{ntc-rest Expense _ ~
Finance Charges • _ . ~
Gain or Loss on Sate of Fuced Assets ~ (307,918)
Rentallncome-Extema) , (124,438) .
Mtscelfaneous Other Income . . (47,651) - •
Net Gatn on Sale of Building ~ . • ~ -
~ (ncome.Taxes ~ 226,960
Tofal Administrative Expense , 20,841,407 ~ .
-Totat All OverhEad ExREnses • . ' 59,809,501
Rate Calculations . ~
Direct Labor 29,169,284 .
FAR Overhead Rate 177.62%
. • Management Adjustrtisnt , -4.80°10
~~Zt'10`~4r.i~~trt?egr~~4;uerh~ad'~~t: -_o~;:
. ~..tiavc.~_~.-, n ..r . ~--.•..c .tu-.~ , a_.~:.._. . -sa~_~_.. _.-..T° ttr.%Jc?_~~./.i!
r' Based an 2004 actuals adjusted fo budgeted utilization and an6cipated costs . ~
' from our 2005 operational profit plans.
' c:tdocume-9lkboVopts-1ltemp12005 provuional overhead rate - summar.xfs '
Exhibit H
Title VI Assurances
Duri.n.g tiie pecfnrmance of this AGREE-MEN'1', the COVSt7LTr1NT, for itself, ifi assigne,es, and successors in
interest agees as follows:
1. Compliance wixh Regulations:lfie CONSUT.,TANT sha,ll comqly with the RegLdafions relative to -
non-ct,iscrimulation in federally assisteti programs of Ehe AGENCY, Title 49, Code of rederal Regulati_ons,
Part 21, as they mszy be acnencled from tinae lo ti.nne (hereinafter referred tu as the "RFCTU'LAT'[ONTS'D, Nvhicli
are ricre;in iucorporated by refereuce and madc a part of this AGREEibLENT.
2. Non-discrin,ination: The CptNSUT.,TAW, with regard to t}ze worl: qerformeci duxiug die AGTtEERVf.ENT, s}titll
not discriminate an the growlds of race, color, sex, or natiorial origi« in the selectYOn wd retcntion of
suh-cottistaltants, includiug procureuient of materials and leases of equipment. T}he CONSUZ.TANT shitll nor
participaGe either di.rectly or inclirectly in Ihe discri.nunation prohibited by Section 21.5 of the
REGUT A11ONS, including cmployment practiccs when ttie AGREBMWI" covers a progi-am set forth in
Appendix.B of the REGt7L,ATIONS. .
• 3. SolicitaCions for Sub-consultanls, Tnctuding:Nrocurem.ent of Materials and l3qiaipmeirt: in ~i.ll soliciGttions either
by compecitive bidding or negotiadons made by the CONSC.J:[,TANT foz work co be perforrne:cl uader a
sub-t;o.ntract, errcludiug prc?curEment of materials or leases Qf cquipuaeric, cach potenfial sub-consultaiit or
supplier s}.-ill be notifiecl by t}ie CONSi,Jf `CAI`zT of the CONSUI:rAINT"S obligations under this -
AGRT?rMENT and the TtEGUT..A7IONS relative to non-discrirni.nation on t}te gromxds of race, color, sex, or
national ori,&.
~ 4. Infomlaiion anci Re orts: The CON. ~t
p J1,TANT shall pmvitie all in.formation and reports required My the
REGU'LAT`IONS or duectives issued pursuant thereto, and shall pemut access to its books, records, accounts,
other sourees of i.nfocmatiou, ancl irs faci]ities as ulay Fie deterrnined by AGFNCY, STA"M, or t}ic H'ederal
Highway A.clministration (F'I-AVA) to be pertinent to asrertai.n campliance wit:h such RT'GU'L,ATTONS, orders
an(i instructiqns, 4Vhere auy infor.mation requi.red ofa CONSULTANT is ui the exclusive possessio.n of ,
• anoeher who fails or refuses to fiuYUSh Chis iufqrmariou, the CONSUL.T11NT shal.l so certify lo the t1CTENCY,.
STA1'Ir or t]ie FTAVA as appropriate; anct shall sel forth Nvlia1 cfforts it has made to obtain the infonnaeion.
5. Sancaons forvnn-compliance: In thc event oFr.he CONSIT'LTAN'T'S non-cornpliance with the von-ciiscrimination provisions of ttlis AGRF;~FI%tEN'1', the AGENCY shall impose such t1GRBFNI~'NT .
s<<nctions as it, the STA"l'F or thc kff\WA rnay deterrrii:ne to be appropriate, i.nelucling, buc not lunite:cl to:
• ~Vithholding of payments to the CONSULTANT' under the AC;IZEEVi~l~rl° until the COI~7SiIf.,`C'~1N''
complies, ~mdior;
• Caucellation, teiniinatyon, or suspension af the AGRFF1v1ENFT, in Nvhole or in pitrt
. .
DOT Form 140-089 EF Exliltrit H
Revise.d 6/O5
6. IucorpQration of:E'rovisions: The CONISULTAiNT shall include the provisions of paragrapt,s (1) through (S) in
every sub-contract, ir.tcludia; procurement of matetials aud leases of equipment, uri.le5s cxempt by the V\
R.HGLTLATTOT?S, ar directives issued pursuatlt ehereco. The COivSU'LTA.NT shall trik.e such action with .
respect to any sub-consu.ltan.t or procurement as the ACTENCY, STATE or FFTGVA may ciuect as a means of
enforcing sueil provisi.oris i.neluciing sanctions for non-eo.mpliance.
Pro,vzded, however, that in ttEe evene a COiNSULTANT bccomes involved in, or is ttu•eaienetl with, liu~atyon
wiih a sub-consi~ltant or supg~lier as a re,.~ult of such directioii , the Cn\TS UI:,Tt11~1'T may reyuest the t~1GENCX
aud the STA'lT e,necr ineo such litig-ition to proeect che interests of the AGENCX ancl the STA7'F and, in
addition, the COVSULTr1NT may request t]ie Unitcd Stxjtes enter into sucli litigation tn profect the i.nterests
of the United States.
. ,
Exhibit I Payment Upon Termination of Agreement
By the Agency Other Than for
. Fault of the Consultant
(Refer to Agreement, Section IX)
Lump Sum Contracts .
A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANI" which wheu added to any payuients previously made shall '
total the samepercentage of the Lump Swn A.momrt as the work completed at ttie ltme of temzination is to the total
work requTred for the PRO.JTGf. In acltiition, the C0NSU1,TAN7' shal] be paid f'or ziny authorized ex.kra work
completett. .
Cost Plus Fixed Fee Contracts
A final. pa.ymenl• shall Me made to the CONSTJLTA~,~',C Nvluc}i when addeti to any payments Previously made, shall tota] the actual eosts plus the same percenrage of'the Fi,Yed fee as the wqrk complerec3 at the time of termination is to
flle total work required for the Projeet. In addiiion, the CONSUT TANT shall be paicl for airy authorizecl extra work
completed. •
Specifc Rates of Pay Contracts
A final paymene shall be made to the CONSULTAN9' for actual hours charged at the time o:f terminatYOn of this
AGREFMEN7' plus any direct nonsalary costs incurrctl at the tYme of terrnination of this AG12.EE•MFNT. '
Cost Per Unit of Work Contracts .
. A fmal payuiene shall be made to the CONSTJI-TAs~f'' for actual imits of wprlc coinpleted at the time nf teinvelation
of this ACTREEMFNT.
- i .
DO'f Form 140-089 -_F ExhFbiQ I . Revrised 6J05
Exhibit J
Alleged Consultant Design Error Procedures - ~
Thc purpose of tlus exhibit is co esUiblish a procedure to cietermine if a consixlcmt's alleged design crror is of a natxire
that exceeds the accepted standarci of care. In addition, it Nvi11 establish a uniform method for the resolurion and/oc eost
recovery procecfures in those insuinces wliere the ageney believes it lias suffered some materisl damagc due to the
alleged eiror by the cansultaric. Step 1-Potcnti~il Consultant Design Trror(s) is IdentifiEd by Agency's Projece Manager
At the f7.rst indication of potential cnnsultant design error(s), the ftrst sCCp in the process is.for the Agency's
peoject rnanager to notify the Din;ctor of F'ublic Wor_ks or Agency Eligineer regarding the poCential design
error(s). For fE;derally fimded prqjects, the-Region Highways and Local Progni:ms Engineer should be infornied antl involved in these proeectttres. (Nlote- The Director of Fublic Works,or Agency rngineer may
appaint an. agency staff person other ilkm the project manager, who has not been as directly involved i.n the
project, tq bc rLsponsible for the remain ino steps in these pracedures.)
Step 2-~Project Manager pocuments the Alleged C:dnsultaut Desigri Prror(s)
After discussion of the alleged dcsign error(s) and the magaitude of the allegect error(s), antl with the •
Directar of Pixblic Works or Ageilcy Fngineer's concurrcnce, the project mariaaer obtams more detailed
clncumentation than is normally required on the project. ExamPles include: all decisions and descriptions of
work; photograplis, records nf labor, materials and equipmeut. Step 3-Cpnrict the Consultarit k.e;garct.ing the Allegcd Desigi Eiror(s) '
. If it is deterrninFxi that there is a necd to proceed furiher, the next step iu the process is for the project
manager to cont;ict the cons«ltant eegardi_qg the alleged desif;n error(s) and the magnitude of the alleged
• error(s). The pt•ojecl manager az►d other appropriate agency staff should rzpresecil the agency and the
consiiltant should be rc;prE;sented by their project manger and any personnel (including, sub-consultants)
dccmed appropriate for the alleged desigu error(s) issue. Step 4- Attempt to T2.esulve Allcged Design. L-rror wirh C:onsuitant
• After the meeting(s) with the corisulcant have beeii complctect regarding the consultant's alleged design
eiror(s), there are thrce possible scetlarios:
• l*t is detemuued via mucual agreement thal tbere is not a consultanl• clesign error(s). If
' kLus is the case, then the process will not pror,ecd beyond this point.
• IC.is determined via mutual age,ement that a cqnsulimit design error(s) ocr;urred. If this is the case, then the Director of Public WorkS or tl;ency Engineer, or their
representatives, negokiate a settlement witlt khe consultauit. The settlement would be
paid to the agency or the iimomat would be reduced fiom the consulCii.nt's agreement
with the a,p,ency for the services or.1 the project in which
' the design error took place. The agency is to provide H&T Y, ttirough the Region
DOT roRn 140-089 EF FyhbEt J
Ftevlsecf 6105
Lacal Programs Engineer, a summary of the settlement for review and to mak-e
' adjustaients, if wy, as to how lhe settlement affects fecferal reunbtusements. No
- furiher action is reqtured.
• There is tiot a mutual ageeinent regal-ding the allegecl consultaitt design error(s). '1'}ie
consultant may request that ihe alleged clesim eirar(s) issue be fonvarded to
the Director nf Public Worl:s pr Agency Fn~neer for rcview. If ttt.e I7irector of
. T'ublic Works or Agency Engineer, after review witFi their legal counsel, is not able
to reach tnutual agi-eement with lhe consultant, proceecl to Step S_
Step 5-Fonvard llocuments to Highways and Loca.l I'rograms
' For fcderally fiiucted projects a(1 available i.nfotr.r<<ition, incluciinb costs, shoicld he fpnvarded througli
the Region Highways and Local Programs Fr.lgineer to H&LP for their review anci eansultation wit}.i, the
1'fI4VA. H&:C.P wilJ mcet «zth r,eprf;sentativcs of the agency and the consultant to review ihe allegccl
design crror(s), and attempt to fnd a resolulyon to the issue. If'necessary, H&LP will request assistance
from the A.ttomey General's Office for legal i.nterpretatiqn. l-i,_4cL,P wil.l a.lso identify how tFie alleged
. error(s) affiects eli4ibilily nf projcet costs for .Cederal reirnbtusement. • If IIlll111d.~ tWeement is reachctl, the agency and cousultant adjust the scope aFwnrk
and costs to zeflect t}ie agreed upon re.solution. M&T.P, in cpn5ultation wir.h FFnVA, will
• ident-ify the acnount of'federaL participaeion in the agek;d typon
resolukion of'the i5sue.
• If mutual <<geement is not reached, the agency aud consultant may seek settlement
. by arbitraaon or by litigation. .
~J/
Exhibit K -
Consultant Claim Procedures .
The purpose of chis F:xtuibit is to describe a procedure regardi.ng clai:m(s) o.n a consu.lrant ageement, The folloNving
proccdures skioulcl on..ly be utilized on consul&-mt clairns greatee tliari S 1,000. If the consuluint's claim(s) are a total of .
$ 1,000 oe less, it would noc be eost efre;ctive to praceed 8iroagtl the qutlined sieps. Tt is suggcsCed that the llirector of
PuMlic IVocks or Agency Fngri.raeer negot-i3te a fair uld reasoftable price for the eqnsultanx's claim(s) that total $ 1,000 or
less.
This ex}ubit will outline the procedures to be fol.lowed by the constiltant aiid the agency to eonsicier a pokential claim hy
the consultant.
Step 1- Cansultajlt riles a Clairn with the Agency Project Mariager
If clie consultaclt deterrriiries that they were requested to perForrn acldilYOna1 services that were out.side of the
agrzement's scope pf Nvork, they may be entifled to a claim. The rrsl scep that must be couipleted is the •
rcquest for consideration of the claim to the A.gency's project aiwager.' Tlie consultant's c]aim rnust outline the tollowing: .
• Stmtmation of liours by classi.fication for each finn ttiat is inctudul iri the claim;
• Any correspondence dhat directccl the consultaut,to perfonn the additiotial wor.k,'
• Timefrante of the additiorlal work t}tat was outside of the project scope; . • Surnrnary oPciireet labor dolla,rs, overhead eosts, profil• ancl reimburs<lble costs associated with
the additional work; and
• Explanation as to why the consultant believes the additiona1 work was outsicle of the
agreement scope of Nvork
Scep 2- Revic:w by Agency Personnel Regardin,p the Consultant's Claim for Additional Compeusation •
After the consultant has completed step 1, the next stE:p in Che process is to forward the request to t:he
Agency's project mariager. The project manager will review the consult<tnt's cla.im and will met wich the
• Ain:ctor of Public «forks or Agency J:ngiu.etr to detemuue if the Ageclcy agrees with the claim. if ttie .
MNYA_ is p-irkicipating in the project`s fundirig, forward a copy nf the consultairt's claim arid the rlgency's
reconui2endatioci for feclcral gm-licipation in t}he clairn to the WSDUT :Eiiyhways and Local PrograrriS
tlirough the Region Local PKpgratns F,ngineer. If the claiIIi is not eligible for feclcral ptuticigation, payment
will need to be frorn agency futids.
Jf the Agency projE;c;t manager,l7uector, of Public Works or tlgency Engineer, WSDOT Highways aud
. 'Local Programs (if applicable), and FMVA (if applicable) agree witti the consuliant's elaim, sencl a requesl•
memq includinR backup documentation to the consultatit to either supplement the agreement, or crea#e a
new agreecnent f.or the elaim, After the request }aa,s been approved, the E1;;ency shall wTite the supplement
ancl/oc.ncw agreemene and pay the cons«ltant the amount of the claim. Tnform the consultsnt tliat the final
payment for the agreemenl• is subject to audif_ No furt:her action in needed regarding the clair.zi procediues.
. .
ooT Fom, 14ao89 EF Erar,lt K
Revised 6105
:If the Ageiicy cines not ag•ree wikh the con.sulGant's claun, proceeci to step 3 of the procedures.
l..~ . ' .
Step 3- Freparalion of Support 17oaiuientation Regardiug Coiasultant's Claim(s)
Tf the Agency claes not agrae t:rith the cons~zltanc's cla'v», the projecl m~tnager s}iall prep~u-e A summary
for fl1e Direclor nf 1'ublic Wor.l-q or Agency Engineer that inchicieci the following:
• Copy of infdrmation supplieei by the consultant regarding the clai.m; • Agency's summation of hotu-s by Glassification for each firm that should be included in the
clvnz; , -
• tlny correspondence ktklY duected the consultant to perform the additional work;
• • Ageucy's summary of direct lahor da.llars, overhead costs, profit and reimbursable costs
assaciated with the nctditional work;
• Fx.planation regarding Chose iueas in which ehe Agency doeSJcioes not agree witti dle
consulutnt's claim(s);
• ExplaiiatYOn tn ciescribe whai has been instituted to prechide iuhire consultanr claim(s); ajid
• Tt.ecommendatian.s to rc;solve the clairri.. °
Step 4-)7irector of Public Works or Agency T'n€;ineer Reviews Co.ns«Itant C;lzim ajid Agency Documentation
The Direc:tor of Fubic Wocks ar Agency rn ;ri.neer shall review aricl actm.inish-ativety apprnve or
disapprove the chim, or portions thereof, which may include getti.ng Agency Counci] o.r Gomnussion
approval (as appropriate to agency dispute resolutian procedures). IF the project involves fecieral plrticipation, obGilLl. COIICLllTence from WSDOT HighNvays aud Local Frograms and FIIWA rt;garding
f nal settlemeut of [tie claim. If the clairn i5 not eligible for fecJeril participation, payment will necd to
be fror.n anF:ncy fimds.
Step 5- biforming Consultant of Dccisi.on Regarding tkte Clai.m
The Director of Public NTJorks or Agency Fngineer shall notifiy (in writin„) the coiisultant of tlleu final
decision regarcling the consullant's claim(s). I«cludc the final dollai• amuunt ol the accepted cl<<im(s)
, and rationale uCilizf;d for the decision.
Step 6- Preparati.on of Supplemerit or New Agreemene for the Consultanc's Claim(s)
"1"he agency shall Nvrite the supplement and/or new agm:f;ment f►nd pay the consultant the vuount of'tlie
claim. Cnfomi the consultxnt th3t the fi.nal payment for the agec;mcnt is subject to audit:
~_i .
E~chibit M-1(a) ' - . Certification Of Consultant
Prajecrh7o. STPUL-3842 002}
Local A'gcncy Spokane NIalley I herebycertiff that.i am DoU las W. Busko, P.E.
and duly authoriwd
repr€sentative of thc finn af David Evans and Associates, InC_ Nvhose addr&ss is
. 110 IJti! Cataldo Spok-ane WA 99201 and ftt neitherT nor the above - fu'm Z here rcpresent has: _
(a) Fmployed or reia.ir3ed for a commission, per,.entage, Urokerags, conf.ingent fee, or otlier .
consi.da~ahion, any fi~ orperspn (other than a $o:na'Tde employee warking solety forme ortha above CONSUI,Tt1N"T) to*solicit or securc the AGREEMENf; ' . (b) Agreed, as an cxpress oz .iaiplied conditi.on for obhaiciing this contract, to employ or retairz the - services of any ~ir,a'n or per~on iu co"nection with cZnyiz9 out this.AGkEEM:'NT; or
(c) Pai.d, or agrecd to pay, to any Srm, organ,iration or ~ersfln (other f:hart a bona 6de euplnyee -
wo,rk.ing solely for me or the above CONSIJLTAIV'i) any fes;, contr_ibudon, donation, or -
consideiation of any ]zi.nd for, o.r m cqztnection vritFl, procuri-ng or c~a.rryulg out tk~is AGRF_FrIL,NT;
except as hexehy expre;sly stated (if any); ' • '
I aeknowledgc that this cartific;ate is tp be available to the %shington State Depaitment Of -
.Transpottatian and thz Fcderal High,%vay Adninistration, 11. S. r)epartin.ent of TrFUisnottation in :
connecti.an with tbis AGR.FF..:MI;NT invq(vin,~ pa~.~cipa~on ofFecle~l-aict liigh,vay funcls,.aud is
tiubject to appticable State and 17ederai laws; both crimi.nal a►ici Givil_ ' . ' November 8, 2005 ~ nr o~c~ - - .
. . , , smnatura .
. I
. . '
DOT Fo'n'+ 140d39 EF Exhftiit ht-5(q) '
Roised M5 . • • .
! -N : . Exhibit M-1(b).
Certification Of Agency Officral T her.eby certi.fy that Z zim the AGENCY Offcial of the I,oca1 Agency of Ciry of Spokane Valley . Washington, and that f3ze consulti.ng finn or its m.presentative has not beeu required, directIy or indirectly as an '
express or implied condirion in conner,tion vrith obEaini or carrying out t:h2s AGREE MEN1' Eo; °
(a) Empl.oy or retain, or agree to eroploy ra retain, any firm orpersnn; or
(b) Pay, or agee to pay, to any fitm, person, or org-,mization, any fce, contributian, clonation, or '
consideraeion 'of any. kind; except u hereby eacpressly stated (if any); . ' • I aclnowiecige that this certificate is to be avaalable to the Washungton State Uepartment of '
Transpertation and the :Federal Higliway Admanistration,'U.S. I7epartm.ent of Tr.anspcixtation, in
ccnln4e6on wii:li tliis AGPdMIciLNT involving patticipaiion of Fecieral-aid highway funds, and is
subjecC to applicable Statc and Fecleral Iaws, both crimi73a1 and civi.l, '
Noveimber 2005 • . ' Date . - : Signature
~ ~ ' - , . • . , .
(}O'1' Forrrt 14a-fl89 EF ExINbit N1-i(b)
• '
Re'vfsed g1um
• ' "
. ExhibEt M-2
Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Respansibility `-Mafters-Primary Covered Transactions . I. Thc prospective primArS+participant certifies to the best ofits knowledge and belief, fhat it anci its principals:
A. Are not presently debarrad, susgended, proposed fnr detaartne,a*, declared incligible, or volunfa.riiy .
excluded frum covered transactions by any tedersl aepattment pr agency; .
B. Mve ►a.ot widdn a three-year perioci'prececlmg this proposal been canvieted of or had a ezvil jutlgment
• rendered against thern for comtivss.ion or'fraud or a crimina( offense i.n connection with olitairxxng,. . attempting to obtain, or nerfoiuiing a public (federaI, stace, or Ioca1) transaciiou or contract under a ' public tran.action; vioIatioz1. oFkderal or staft-, antitrust sf'atue,S or commissiUn of eiubezzlc;ment, .
the$, forgeiy, bribery, falsificzltian or disttucfiion of recorcis, making •faise stateme;nts, or receiving
stolen property; . . C. Are not pre„sent[y indicted for or othenvisc crimuially or civilly charged by a governmeatai eutity, , (federal, S6rL1e, or locst) Frith corxunission of any ofthe offenses enumei-ated in para,graph (T)(B). of this
• certificatian; anci .
D. Have not within a th:rec (3) year period preceding this applicatian/proposal had acie or more pubkic
transaetions (f"ederal, state, or local) terinitnatui for cause or, ciefault.
. T.T. Where tfie prospective pr.imary p;uticipant is unable to cezii.fy to any of rhe siatements in tWs certification,
such praspective participant shdll atGzch an explanation to this proposal. • /
. CO7SL~~t (Firm): David Evans and Associates, Inc. .
November 8, 2005
(DatQ) (Sig6a!u,e)I.1, ~identerAuihcrizedOfficialofConsultant
' DOT Farrn 140-089 EF Exhib$ M-2 , . Rw'sed V05 . .
~ Exhibif M-3 • ~ • Certification Regarding The Restrictiorts ' • .
• of The.use of Federal Funds for Lobbying •The prospecuce p4zticipznt ec.Ttifies, by siguing and submi[ting this bid or pmpvsal, to the best of his or her '
Icnowledge and bet.ief, dhat: . 1_ No federal,apprapriated funds have beett paid or aril.l be paid, by or on behalf of the ueadcsrsigned, to
. auy person fox iniluencing or attemgting.fa in:fluence azi ofacw or etoployee of any Federal agency, x
. ' member of Congre4s, an officcr or.employce of Congress, or an er.ciployee of a member of Congcess in . '
coamection with the'awardirag of any Federal contact, thc n~llciuJg of any FedeW grant, the making of
any Rede.ral loan, the entering into of any cocyperative agrGement~.and the extensinn, contiliuation, '
renewal; amen.ciment, or inodifieation of any Federal contcAct, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. •
2. If ariy fiznds other than. Fedcral apprvpriated fimds have been gaid qz'will be paid to any person for .
inffuencing or aftmpfing to in$uence an offieer, or employee of auy Federal aaegcy, a incmber of
Congr>ss, an officer or emplnyee of Gnngress, or aci cmployee of s rnembex of Cov.gress in connection with t}us Federal cont.ract, grant, loan, or cooperitive agrecment, the undersignecl shaIl complete and
submit Standarcl Form-LI,L; "Disclosure Fonn to Rcport Lobbying,°" in accordance wifh its i.nstructions. . Tttis certification is a iYiaterial reprasentation of fact upott which reliance was placed wlzen this
. hmnsaction rvas made or enter~d iuto. Suhrnission of this ce.rtif cation is 'a prereqUisite for m~~uig or
~ entering into dus'tr~ansaction unposei by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Airy gcrsoq who -fails to
~ file tt►e requireci certiification staall le subjcct to a civil penalty of not ]ess han $10,000 and not rnore
than $100,000 for each such failure. . '
The prospective p-u-ticipant also agrees by submiEting his or her bid or proposxl that he or she sha]I .
require1hat the languige of this cettiS.catiou Ue included in all ]ower ti& sitheontracts .vhich exceed .
~ 100,000aud Yhat au such subrecipients shatl ce;tify and discIase ac:corciiug y.
Consutt3nt (Flrm): Davici Evans and Assaciates, Inc. . • , ) . '
November 8, 2005 (Date} (Signa?urs) FrEs(d nt, or Authorized ofRdal Z Can,utlant -
~ . • GOT F-orm 144089 EF Exhiblt M3 Revisej CA5 " -
Exhibit M-4 . Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data - - '
This is to certify tliat, to Ehe best ofmy knowlecige and helief, the cost or pric.ing dala (as defi.n.ed in •
sectiort I5:401 of ttle Federal Acyuisicion Regulation (FE1R) and rE,quired iinder PAR tiubsec+tion* 15.403-4)
subinitted, --ither acfua[ly or by specific identiiication in writing, to the contraecing off'icer or to khe ccanEr.acting officer's represetitative i.a suppn.rt of STPUL-3842(002) are accuratc, complete, ancl current ss of Novei-ober 8, 2005 T1Zis cer[ifir.z~ieat i:aiclucics
dte cost or pricing data suppArting auy advance agie--ments and forwarti pricir~g raiE; agreement4 bstiveeu thc o5eror and the Govezntnent that ara pai# of the proposal. '
ri-rm David Evans and Associates Inc. NFUYie Douglas W. Busko, P.E. 'ticie Associate, Senior Civil EnginePr , Date ofExecution"* November 8, 2005 . Identify the proposaE, quotalion, rcquest for price adjusinient, or othez subr.nission involved, -
giving the appropriata identifyiug numbs;r (e,g., RFP No.).
Insert the ci:ry, month, and year whe.n pzice negotiatioris were concluded and riee a~
ed_ P enlerit was
reach ,
Insert t11e clay, mpnkh, actc,i year of siguing, which should be a.S clnsc: as prlckicable to the date
when the price negotiations wc.Te concluded and ib.c eontract price was agxeed to. • ' ~
L)o7 Ferm 140-089 EF Exbibk 144
ReAsed G+OS . .
.
Spokane ;WoValley 11707 E Spra,ue Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhal[espokanevalley.org
Informational Mem2eft
orandum To: City Council - Meetin , h/o ~ i~,2 p p~From: Louis Graf, Engineer (CIP)~ le&-_
Thru: Neil Kersten, Public Works Director
Steve Wortey, Senror Engineer (CIP)
Cc: Carolyn George Date: Octob2r 26, 2005 Re: . Engineering Services Appleway Avenue Project - Tschirley to Hodges, RFQ No. 05-
015
The Appleway Avenue Project is funded by a Nederal Surface Tritnsportation Pmgrarn (Urban) "
(STP([J)) Capital Constructidn Progrtun Grant, appraved by SRTC cin December 14, 2005. 'I'he .
total budget for this project is $3,197,000. Gity participation is $431,700 (13.5% of totsl budget).
Thc Preliminary Engi.neering (1'H.) pha.se budget is $193,000. The City's Ioeal match of $26,100
fnr PE was included in the 2005 Slreet Capital Projects Fund.
Previoas Council Actions: • Couneil approvod thc itmended 2005-201.0 T.TP on April 26, 2005.
• Council -ipprnved tfie PE phase in the amended 2005 Sireet Capital Projects Budgel on
. 1%Iay 10, 2005.
, • Council apprnved die WS]aQT T.oc;ail Agency Agrecment, required for Federally ftinded
projects, on Felaruary 22, 2005. A budget summary fnr the PE phase is as follo,,vs: .
. Gcotechnical In vestination - Budinger (under contract) $17,800
Surveyina - A dains & Clark (conCract not yet eYecuteci) -$23,500 ,
State - StaffTirne (cstimate) . $2000
City - Staff Time (estirnate) $5000 -
Fngineering Consultant - llavid Evans & tlssoc. (contract to be negotiated) ' 144 .QO`
$193,000
The budoet for the right of way acyuisition phase (RNV) is $416,000 ($56,200 City, $359,800
Fed).
The budget for the eonshvction phase (CNI) is $'2,588,000 ($349,400 City, $$2,238,600 Fed).
The City has gotic through the R.equest for Qualifications (RFQ) prncess for engincering services .
and ha.s selected David Evans and Associate,s as the most highly qualified firtn for this project. .
DEA wil l subttiiC q draft contract, scopc and budget the week of October 24 to begin contract
.
~
negotiations. Rreliminary engineering (.P.E), right-nf-way acquisition servic;es (R.VIr) and
construction management and inspection serviees (G~i') will be negotiatutl now. ContriYei -.J
supplements for RW and CN phases of the projcct will be added when funds for these phasGC are
approved. It is anticipated that a PF contrac•t will be finalized ttnd ready for execution by
3~7ovember 8, 2005.
Budinger is under cnntraet anci has bcgun die geotech feld inve,stigation. Adans & Clark will be
trnder contraet soon to start the topographic survey work.
The final contract wiCh TaF_.A will be presented to Cnuneil for approval on 11'ovember 15, 2005. lf you have questions or need additional informxtion pleF►se don't hesitaCe to ask. Thank you.
~
. "
'Appleway Avenue Scope of Services #2 (Right of Way Acquisition)
Tlus project involves i.mprovements to Appleway Avenue from just east of the signal at Sprague Avenue
to Hodgcs R.oad, for a total length of approximately 1.2 iiules. The ehisting four-lane cenient concrete
roadway «=ill be oblitcrateci and a five-lane asphaltic concr.ete roadtivay with curv, sideivalk, and diaiua~e
impr.ovetnents wiil be constructed. T'he si?nal at Barker Road will bc upgraded to current City and
WSDOT standards. .It is imderstood that a porfiiort of the project on the east End is locatecl in Spokane
Coutity; ttie City will piusue and fiualize all aj eements and arrangeizlents pErtaining ta tiliis short section
of roadway.
Dt-F1 will providc Riglit-of-Way aequisition scrvices as outluied below. All acquisition activities will
conforniv to the most current WSllOT R.ight-uf Way Macnial. -
1. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION
1.1 Project Coordination with City DEA's project ulauager will coordinate with the City projecl n,anacrer on 3 continual basis for the
durakion of the praject. Mcans of, caiuuiunication s1ialJ include tElephone calls, letters, arid e-n7ails; all
correspondence between TaFA a.nd the City wi_Ll be dociunentecl for the project file. •
1.2 Projectlnvoicing.and File Management
I7EA adrninistralive staff will prepare monthly project invoiees and track the projcct buciget on an
angouig basis. The administrative staff and the DEA project manager will also be resporisible for
maintauung paper anci electronic documents tliroughout the life of the project.
2. RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION 2.1 PrEpare Acquisition Lega! Descriptions and Exhibifs
As acquisition negotiations go fonvar.d, legal de.seriptions of the proposed acquisition parcels will bc
prep3red. At this step, the title reports for each parcel will be reviewed. Cf uecESSary, the property lines
for the proposed acquisition_ parcels (as devel.oped from the retracemeut siuvey) will be adjusted to be ui
accordance witb t:t~ic legal descriptions that appear in the title repoits. I'or purposes, o£ this 5copc, it is
assumed tllat no more than three parcels will nced to be adjusted. _
This siep will be coordinated with ihe, acquisition effort;s so as to minimire revzsious driven by
acquisition iiegotiati_ons. It is antycipated that initially, Acqiusition Exhibits Nvill bc prepared £or purposes
of showing the proposed acquisition parcel to the existing parcel owtier. These ex.lubits Nvill be pre~ared .
f,rom the Prclirninary TZight-oF Way Plail discussed abave. 1f a prcliniinary agreeinent ia reached Nuith the
parcel owner and requestcd by the negotiation agent, a legal desc;ription will bc prepared to insert into the
acquisitiou document. ,
Taue to the particular circu.ulstances that may arise with iudividual parcel oNvners, some eahibit;s and Icgal.
descriptions may have to be revised prior to finalizalion of the acquisition doctuuents. Far purposes oT
~ th.is sco e it is assumed that ten or less
p parcels will require exfubits anci legal descriptions anci that tliree
or less parcels will need one itEration of revised eahibits a.nd legal descriptions. Tt is also assumeci tliat no
lcgal ciescnptions wil.l be reqtured £or temporaly c4nstructian agrecrnents. All legal dcscriptions will be
ApplewayAvenue Scope of Work
Wdwbo/A,npleway Scopz.doc . Page 1 of 3
prepared under tlie direct supervision of a Professional Gand Surveyor, licenscd in the State of
«ashiragion, ancl signeci and sealeci by the supervising tand sureeyor. 2.2 Pre-Acquisition Packets . '
, DEAwill prepa.re offei:lbenefit packets ror the properties to be ac.quired, wtuch will then be presentEd to
the appropriate parties o.f interESt. Ttus packets wi_U. include: the TRS 4V-9 form, of;Fer letter, real estate
excise tax affidavit, recording cover sheet, deed ajicUor easement, riglit-of-entry agreemeut (if deemed by
the agcnt to be vital to negotiations), legal description, axid if necessary, dther supportiug documentarion.
The format and contenE af'the offer/bcnefit packets Nvill be reviewed and approved by the City bct'ore the
off.ers are tenciered. r1s nccessary, the City will provide DEA with cxa.tnples of Ci.ty forms DEA may not
already possess.
2.3 Liaisons and Negotiations _ CJpon the release of praject R/W funds, DEA «ill conmlence negatyations for the acquisitions in a tymely
fa,shion. DE-A shall attempt to acquire all ident7fieci property within the project limits, throu,,h writteu .
offers to each owner. T.ndividual acquisition Suuunaries of Negotiations (diarics) will be mainiai.ned by
, the assigclcd agent and shall contain an adequate written record of each individual propcrty negotiation
includin.g, but not limited to, the folloiving:
Date and place of contacts;
Persons present;
' O:£fer made (aclual clollar anou.nt) Critieal acqiusition issues as identified by the praperfiy owncr;
Counteroffer iuade;
J'usdfication for setflement or non-settleinent.
tldnutush•ative Settlements will be made in accorcia.uce wilh the WSDOT AdiiuiustratYVe Settlemenl
Procedures.
3. FINAL RIGHT-OF-WAY PLANS
3.1 Prepare Tofa! Ownership Map
. DEA will prepare a 1'otal QNviiership Map as appropriate to obtain approvll by the reviewing agency.
This map Nvill show existing nwnerships anci proposed 3cquis.ition Parcels, as well as a,ti ovv-nership table
. of the a£fecfed owners and pertuient acreages. Tt is anticipated that a preliminary version of this map will
be pr.eparcd initially iu accordance witli preliininary dcsign and proposed acquisitions. As acquisitions go
fonvard, a fiual version "vi11 be procluced to reflECt final acquisilians. This map «rill be prepared uuder
the clircct supervision of a.FrUfessional Land Sluveyor, licensed in lhe.Statc of Washuigton, and signed
and sealed by the suPervising land siu-vcyor.
3.2 Prepare Final Right-of-Way Plans -
Upou the complet7on of acquisition negotiations, D'.A_ tivill prepare a detailed R.ight-of-Way plaii as
apProPriate to obtain a roval b the revie~vin enc Tlus lan ~~~ill be based on the RiQ t-of-GVa ~
PP Y ~ a~ Y F~ ~ Y.
Rctracement Survey; final engineering design plans developed by AEA in a pre'vious task, and final "
acqtusitiou legal ciescriplions. This plan will be prepared under the direct supervision of a Frofessional
ApplewayAvenue Scopo of Work
IVdwho/Appletvay Sco,oQ.doc Paye 2 af 3
~
Land Sunreyor., ]ieensed in the State of Waslungton, aiid signed. and sealed by the supenzsing land
surveyor.
ADDITIONAL SERVICES T.he fol.lowing additional services Nvill be performed if necessary. A written supplcmental a.greeinent will
be execnted pri.or to initi_ating this work.
ASSUMPTIONS . .
■ The City of Spolcane Valley will p'rovide DBA with the final, Right-of-Way Retraccmeiit-SurvEy arid
associated file and docunients as detailed abovc.
■ The R.ight-o.f.-Way 12etracement Survey will be suitable for tfie development af Right-of=Way plans
and acquisition legal clescriptions_
■ Eight hotirs or less of a two rnan survey crew will be necessary to perforni a limited field check of
' the Right-nf-ti'Vay Retracenlent Survey. ■ ThE Right-of=Way Retracement Survey has been properly rEfereuced to the VVasbinglon State Plane
. Cnordi.nate Systeln.
■ Three or fewer adjaining parcel lines will need tU be adjusted to bc in a.ccordance «rith the legal
description that a{ipears in the title rcport. '
■ Ten or fewer acquisilion parcels will be requirecl. One iteration of ttiree or fewer revisinns will be
required. ■ No l.egal ciescriptions for temporary consinictioti agreements Nuill be required. ,
. ■R.ight-of-way re.ference mon.uments will be placed Uy 17EA as describecl in the Scope of Scrvices 1or
Coustiuction Adininistration. f 1 .
pnAle;,lay pveritJo Scope of Work
K/dwbo/Aqpleti•lay Scope.doc Page 3 of 3
City of Spokane Valley
APPLEWAY AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS .
Estimated Fees
• c` 2T sct . ~Pra e
2 P rtY P Survey Survey Survey Atlmiq ~ d m
T!~SK~i)ESGRIPiTIOt~ -,O,T,A ~11a~a arw S, oclal
~S ist Coor,dinator P.L.S,- Coor,dlnator PaL Chief Tocliniclar.~ Asst. . A~t~
Ra.o,perkour $'32.50 S33.00 $22.00 S33.00 $26.00 $22.25 S14.50 $21.?.3 $92.50
1. PROJEC7 ADMINISTRATION
_ • 1.1 Proect ooardina':ian %ti•ith City 40.0 40_0 8.0
1.2 Invoicing and File Manafl¢ment 4.0 4.0 8.0 8.0
Subtotar - Navrs 112.0 44.0 44.01 0.4 810 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.0 8.0 Sub;ots!- 7ask a $3,416 $1,430 $1,452 .S'0 $264 $0 ' SO $0 $170 $100
2. RIGWT OF 4YAY ACQUISITION
2.1 PrE~aro legals and exhibits 1.0 2.0 2Q.0 12.0 8.0 40.0 1.0
2.2 Pre•.^cquisilion packets 24A 72.0 24.0
2.3 Lfalsons arui negatiations 16.0 240.0 24.0 8.0
Subtofa! - Nours 496.0 17.0 264.4 98.0 24.0 12.0 8.0 40.01 24.4 9.0
SubfofAf-Task2 513,905 $533 $J,712 . $2,156 $792 $312 $778 $580 1 $510 5913
3,'FINAL R14Y pU4NS
3.1 Prepare Total Ownership A4ap 1.0 9.0 8.0 32.0
3.2 Rrepare final RAN Ptans 1,0 4.0 16.0 24,fl
Subtatar - Ffocrts 85.0 2.0 0.0 4.4 25.0 8.0 0.0 36.0 0.0 0.0
Su62o:aJ-7ask3 $4,998 $65 $0 $88 $825 $208 $D $812 50 $0
. 707AL HoURS 703.0 63.0 308.0 102.0 57.0 20.0 8.0 96.0 32.0 17.0
70TAL LABOR DSC $19,319 $2,048 510,164 $2,244 $1,881 $520 $178 $1,392 $680 $213
DSC z OVM (1.7532) $33,494
DSC x Fec 29;'e) $5,603
$58,405
Expenses. • Travel (hrio 4ripe for Sr. Pro . Spac.) $600
Por cfiam S600 Detivcrias S750
&Wea9e
TotalEzpenses $2,200
TzO:itAL4EST(~'I~q~,~,T~D~F~EES~~ P " - ' $60.60 .
'7his estimated tee vrill be revised to reRect aurrent latror rates aE tha llrne the A reement
is entered into between the Cit and DEA
i Mraoo5
FpplmvsyBSlMS 103105.iiM. DAVID EVANS ANCAO~ OCIATES, INC.
~ . ; ~
.
Appleway Avenue Scope of Services #3 (Construction Administration)
Tlus projeel involvES improvemeuts to Appleway Avemie From just east of the sigual at Spragtze .F1.venue
to Hodgcs Road, for a total length of approaimalely 1..2 ilules. Thc cxistin ;;f,ouz-lane cement conecete
roaciway Nvill be obliterated'and a five-lane asphaltic eoncrete Y-oadway with curb, sidewalk, ancl drainage
improveuients will be constnicted. The sipa1 at Barker Road will be upgraded to cttrrent City and
WSDOT standards. It is under.stood that a portian o£ the project on the east end is located iu Spokane
County; the City will pursue aiid finalize all agreeiueuts and arrangements per.tainiun to ttus short section_
of roadwa5+. DEA. m.ay provide conslxuction adininistration services for the project, including: conductin- tic pre-
constniction meeting, performing claily coustruction Observati.ol7, rev-iewing uiaterials subm_ittals,
processing change arders, aiid documenting the project iu accordance wilh WSDOT regLilations.
tifalerials testiug will be per.formed by a geotechnical subconsultaut einploycd by DEt1, however, it is
. assumed that consi.ruction staking will be provided by the Contractor.
1. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION 1.1 Projecf Coordination with City
17EA's projecl manager Nvill coordinate witli the City project manager on a canli.nual basis for the
duratiou of construction. Meaus of cornmunication shall iuclude telephone calls, Ictters, and e-mails; all
corresponclence benvicen .DFA. anci the City will bc documented for the project file.
` . ~
1.2 Project Invoicing and File Management
llEA adnunistrative staff «411 prEpare mnnthly project invoicES and track the project budget on an
angaing basis. The administrative sta.ff' aud the DEA project manager Nvill also-be responsible f.or
maintairung paper and electronic documents throughout the life of lhe praject.
1.3 Pre-Construction Conference
The DFA. project manager and .field personnel will cnnduct a pre-constniction conference with the pritne
contractor arzci tlie subconsultants to establish: lincs of com.niunication,-paynient proecdures, the process
for clispute resolutiou, and uther general project expectations.
1.4 Construction Administration (office) The :I7EA projecl ma-nager vvill be responsihle £or reviewuig payrolUwage certi.(:icat;ions, BE0 stateincnts,
af.firniative action plans, mnntl1ly utilization reports, cnnductiub wage intcroiews, negoEiating the scopc
-ind cost of necessary contract change arders, pr.eparuig contract change or.der anci pay estimates, and
compleling tlie forms and papern~ork for Fcderally Fimded projects. Plan rcvisions or c1ilrifications
' during construct7on ar.e also includcd in this task. 2. DAILY OBSERVATION AND DOCUMENTATION . ' 2.1 Daily Observation and Documenfation
DEA f.ield personnel ~Nqll provide ciail}° observatioii of the contractor's activiries. They will also prepare
progt-ess reports, veri,fy completed quarltities for pa}ment, review product submiitals, detennine
subslantial coIIipletion, prepare punch lists, and conduct weekly construction meetings with thc
contracior.
Rppleta,ayA~ienue Scope of Work
K/dvvbo%Appleway Scope.doc Pago 9 of 3
.
r V %
2.2 Materials Testing
Earttnvork. A soils lechnician will ,risit the site to examuie utility excavations and subgrades. Field
ciensity tests (eornpaction) ~Nill be per.£orn-ieci by uiaclear n.iethocls on subgractes, on each lift of fill or
backfill placed ui pavi.ng areas, and over site utilities. The majority of these visits will likely be periodic,
except during backlill over deeper components (foundations, utilities) where continuous examination and
tesCiPg will be necessary. Samples of onsite and borrow soils will be tak-cn aiid laboratory tcsts will be
conductcd to detemune suitabi.l_ity and maximiun density/opti_mum moishue if necessary.
Concrete. A concrete technician will visit the sile to perfonn concrete placement iuspections, conciuct
slump and air entrainment tests, aiid cast compressivc streiigth specimens dlu-in ; concrefe l~lacements.
Sarriples `vill be collecteci the follnwing day and rehirneci to the laboratory for curin~ until test age.
Asphalt Coiicrete Pavetnent. Aii asphalt concrctc teclw.ician will be present during paving io sample
pavement, perforni compaction tcsting, aiid monitor paving operations. Sa.mples of ACP will be tcstcd in
the materials testing finn's Iabor.ato ry for asphalt contcnt, sieve analysis, and thcoretical inaxiumm
specific gravi_ty. The materials testing firm shall be notified of the necd for testing services a miriunuin of twenty-four
hours before thEy arc needed. _ TSped reports detailing the results of tests aud inspectYOns will bc processed and mailed on a weekly Uasis
to the contractor, City, aiid engineer_
3. R/W MONUMENTATION
3.1 R/W Contro/ Monumenfation A DEA Professional Land Sui-veyor will set up to foiir monunienl cases aiid monuments along ihe project _
comidar. It is assumed thai these monuments wi11 be offset from the centerline of fhe roadway, to
Faeilitate .furure use by the surveying commun.itiy. The momunEnt cases and pipes shall be provided. and
installcd by the contractnr. NO other monlunents will be sel per this task or miy otlter t;:isk.
3.2 Preparation of Record of Survey
Washingfon statE statues relating tn land surveying requ.ire a Recorcl of Siuvcy to be filed when bocuidary
titonuments are set. DLA Nvill set f.pur righ[-of way reference nlontiments as described in `Casl: 3.l . A
Record of Survey drawi.ng will be_ produced shoWing the final riglit-of-way conrguration. Tlus drawiug
will: show ri(;hl-of way cantrol monuinents set; contain complete dimensional information for the new
right-of-way; ancl referencc tlie itight-of-`Vay Retracement siu-vey and the projcct 12ight-of-`GVay 1'lans.
No state plane coordinate values IvN-ill be sliown on this-survey. This survey will be prepared under the
direct supervision of a I'rofessional T and Surveyor, licensed in the State of Wasluugtou, and signed ancl sealed by the supervising land surveyor.
appleavayAyenuv Scope of Work
Wdwbo/Applev--ay Scoge.uoc Page 2 of 3
,
4. ADDITIONAL SERVICES ~
lhe followirig additional services will be pert'ormed ifnecessary. A Nui-itten supplemental agreemcnt will
be executed prior to initiali.ng tlus work.
• Constzuction stakins or re-staking
• Uevelapnient and production of Record Drawiigs • _ .
. .
ApplewayAvenue ' Scope of Work
K/d~vbo,/Applei•va y ScoFe.doc Page 3 of3
City of Spokane Valley
APPLEWAY AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS
Estimated Fees .
~ I.N` '3 !I •
P o ect DQSiyn Lep'~"adiFlold ~Construe Ion Lar n'dscape Su'r. ey . ' Su ey Suivoy ~'dmP`
T~ASK DESCR P,.~lil0 . T~Q~TA
,El fanager T;;a.ch_~lalan. , dministrator ~T~ec, hnlc an flasigner Goordfnato ~,a,, Chief Instrumentrpan~ ~.fisst •,~Asst:~
Rat= aerHour
1. PROJECT ADhtINI5TRATlOk $32,50 S25.00 ' $23.75 $20.00 $29.75 $33.00 $26.00 $22.25 $99.7.5 $29.25 512.50
1.1 Rroject coord3nation wilh Git 10.0
1.2 Invooqng 3nd Fite i.Lanagemem $,p 8A 8.0
1.3 Pre-oonstnnction Contererxe 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.0
i.A CoiistrucEion Acimin3,,trallon (offLre) 120.0 ' 40.0 8.0
Scrbfofar - Hours 245.0 172.0 40.0 4.01 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.Q 0,4 8.0 17.0
Subtotal - Taski $7,148 $5,590 $1,000 $35 $80 ,S'0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $170 $213
2. DAILY OBSERVATION AND DOCUMENTATION ~ I
2.1 Daily oDservati4n and docvntentatian 1040.0 800.0 24.0 8 ~
2_2 h9aterials Tesling
5es Ex enses •
Subtctal - Hours 1872.9 0.0 0.0 1040.0 600.0 24.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 8.0
Su4gofaf-7osk2 $41,322 g0 $0 $24,700 $16,000 $522 $0 $0 SO 1 $0 S0 SP00
3. R/1N PAONU1dENTA710N .
3.1 RA°I DAOnurrunta2ion 1.0 1.0 1.0
99.0 iG0 .
3.2 Record of Sur~-r~y 2 ~ S4 O 1 0
_ Subfotaf - Nours 55.0 1.0 0.0 0.0~ 0.0 0.0 3.O 15.0 19.0 16.0 0.0 1.0
SubtotaN - 'tasJc3 $1,265 $33 $O $0 ~ ,SO s0 ,599 $390 $423 .8'308 $O $13
TOTAL HOURS 2,172.0 173.0 40.0 i,044.0 804.0 24.0 3.0 15.0 99.0 16.4 8.0 26.0
TOTAL LABOR qSC $49,734 $5,623 $1,000 $24 795 $16,080 $522 $99 $390 $423 $3013 $170 $325
DSC x OVH (1.7332 $8G,199
bSC x Fee (29%) $14,423
$150,357
Expen:tC~ .
P,taterials 9es;irxg $26,000 -
Defiveries $100
DAi"eage 1500 •
Total Expenses $27,600 TOT~QL ESi~IP~7`qTED.{F,EES,~ f'`''•{ ~5~; ~5~~~7,~7;957
'This estfmalecf tee will be revised eo ratEect curren8labor rates at the tirne the Aqreement '
is eniered into benveEn Ihe Cit and DEA
1118f200.5
ApplaNayo; ~ r.:~_M ios.xis ' DAVID EVANS ANG% °IOCIATES, INC. `'.age1
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: November 15, 2005 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information 0 admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Employee Classification
GOVERNING LEGISLATI.ON: Ordinance 44 establishes the Employee Classification system,
and Resolution 03-031 authorizes the City Manager to periodically review and update all
position descriptions to assure that the duties and responsibilities remain current. •
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Informational Memo October 25, 2005 .
BACKGROUND: The Deputy City Attorney (DCA) position was added to the City's
classification matrix in April 2003 at Grade 16. Since incorporation, Spokane Valley's approach
to legal services has evolved. The City began with a contract City Attorney, with the Deputy
City Attorney as the City's sole. in-house counsel. This summer Spokane Valley hired its first in-
~ house City Attomey. , A review of the DCA responsibilities and comparison of its placgment on our matrix cOmpared
with similar positions has resulted in a recommendation of reclassification to Grade 18. The
attached 10/25/05 informational memo provides more detail. A motion consideration on this topic is scheduled for November 29, 2005.
OPTIONS: 1) Reclassify DCA position to Grade 18; 2) Maintain DCA position 'at Grade 16; 3) Provide additional direction to staff.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Provide direction to staff
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Comparing the maximum of Grades 16 and 18, there is a
$14,964 annualized difference for a full-time employee.
STAFF CONTACT: Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager
ATTACHMENTS
1. October 25, 2005 Informational Memo
~2. Powerpoint Presentation
S&K~ane . _
; Va11ey ;
11707 E Sprague Ave Suitc 106 ♦ Spokane Valley V/A 99206
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org
Memorandum To: City Manager David Mercier and Members of Council
From: Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager Date: October 25, 2005
Re: Deputy City Attorney Classification '
1'he Dcputy City Attorncy (DCA) pUsicipn was created iu April 2003. Up until swnmer
2005; when Spokane Valley's tirst urhouse City Attorney was hired, the Iaeputy City
Attorney (1.0 FTE) was the City's ot-ily in-house legal position. Upon its crcation, the position xvas classified at Grade 16 ($49,740 -$63,768 per year).
. The City periociically reviews position dcscriptionS and placemeiit on the classification
matt•iY to malce siirc compcnsation for the position is appropriate.
Thc purpose of this memo is to sum_marize ttie results of a rcview oP the ]aeputy City Attprney pnsition description and classification. '
Analysis of the TICA Positiou
W.itli a small ui-house lceal staff, Spokane Valley has always e:cpectcd a high degree of
cxper.ience, knowledge and prnfessional.judgment of the 17eputy City Attorney position.
Further., the Cily lias always relied upoii the I7CA ta act independently and effectively
based upon that judgment. The UCA also sErves as acting City Attorney in. the City
Attorney's abseilce. This was the case whetlier the City Aitorney was contracted or was a
City employee.
lhesc expectations were reilected in t11e otigitial description. City stafthas revamped the
position description to beeter articulate certaiii respocisibilitics, and to revise snme general
lasiguage.consistent with other position ciescriptions ereaied or reviscd over the past year.
These changes fall uito the category of clarification rather tllan new responsibilities. ,
Com»arables 'Che next question is whether the DCA position is appropriately classified on the City's
matrix given the assignecl responsibilities. Rfe typically look for private and public comparables. "
Depufy City Attorney Classification, continued
Oclober 25, 2005
Page 2 of 2
i~
13ecause of the dcgrcc of sophistieation and knowledge required; as well as the level of
respousibility the City confcrs upon the DCt1, the position is betfer compared lo se&wned
attorneys rather than attorneys wha are just starting out.
NkThile there are many privately Pzacticinj altorneys, it would be easier if we were
conlparino the salaries of attorneys who are relatively new to the field. As private
attorneys gain experience and receive added responsibiliiy and cxpECtations of
uidependent judgment and action, thcy are frequently compensated in ways not typical to the public sector; such as profit sharing or bonuses. Therefore, il is dif`ficult to compare
the compensation of the City's IaCA to comparable positions in the private sector.
Follovving it a summary of the annual salaiy nf inunicipal attoiney classificatioiis in some
eomparable Washington cities. This analysis focuses on positions with comparablc
responsibilities. '
Keiuiewick Assistant City Attorne II $60,168 $88,884
I'asco no in-house atfiorneys iVa n/a
Richland Assistant Ci y Attomey 60,$76 91,332
Yakima Sr. Assistant City Attorney I 68,724 83,568
The annual zalary of some local comparables includc:
~ M City of S okane Assl•. Cil Artorne I.-LIT $67,740 $$4,036
Spokane Co. Chief Taeputy tattoniey 77,016 $9,460
Spokane Va11Ey's 17CA is classified at Grade 16.
Ma.
16 current , $49,740 • $63,768 17 55,272 70,860
18 (recommended) 61;416 78,732
Recommendation
Staff recommends reclassifyuig the Deput}, Cit}, Attorncy position to Grade 18. Grade 18
includes the Platuiuig lvlanager, the Building Official and the riwo supervisory Scnior
Lnginecr positions. These posilions are coinparable to ttic 1llCf1 when considering degree
of professinnal knowledge and eapertisc; as well as expectatioil of uidependent judgment
exercised.
~
Employee Classification: Deputy City Attorney
City of Spokane Valley
Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager
November 15, 2005
. • o o General Responsibilities
o Provides professional legal advice to
City Council and departments
o Monitors and manages assigned legal-
related service contracts
o Drafts ordinances, resolutions, leases,
franchises, contracts, agreements, etc.
o Assists departments in ensuring that
laws are faithfully enforced
o Serves as Acting City Attorney
z neWy Gtr,~~y
cuastrKab.i a arssms
1
~
• ~ ~ C-omparables
,
City Location Population Max. Salary
Kennewick Central WA 60,410 88,884.
Richland Central WA 43,520 91,332
Yakima Central WA 791480 83,568
City of Spokane E Washington 198,700 84,036
Spokane County E Washington 436,300 89,460
City of E Washington 85,010 63,768
Spokane Valley
3 . OVwbub+~r
Cl~ikatkn I1/15N3
Recommendation: Change
in Grade from 16 to 18
Position Grade Max. Salary Annualized D9ficroncc
Deputy City 16 63,768 ~Attorney
Deputy City 18 ' 78,732 14,964
. Attomey
4 oe;rr, cr, nrmR.av
cas;rcaao»nsos
~ ._J2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 11/15/05 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Administrative Report on November 16, 2005 Steering Committee
of Elected Officials Meeting
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA), RCW
36.70.A .
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None
BACKGROUND: Spokane County is conducting a 5-year update to their Comprehensive Plan;
adopted November 15, 2001. Important steps in the update process include; 1) Adopting a
Countywide population projection; 2) dividing the projected population between jurisdictions; 3)
conducting a land capacity analysis to determine the amount of buildable land available to
accommodate growth, 4) updating capital facilities plans to determine ability to provide required
~ facilities and services for projected growth; and 5) adjusting Urban Growth Areas in consultation
with cities and towns. The County expects to have the. Comprehensive Plan Update completed
by the end of 2006, but there is no specific work program detailing the tasks necessary to
accomplish the update.
City Council is currently conducting public hearings and deliberations on Spokane Valley's first
Comprehensive Plan. The Plan does not propose external Urban Growth Areas for the City's
. future growth and development. The decision to limit growth within the City's current boundary
-
was due to wastewater treatment capacity issues. .
Spokane Valley has the opportunity now to propose external UGAs during the County's
Comprehensive Plan update process. Changes resulting from the County's Comprehensive
Plan update would be incorporated into Spokane Valley's Comprehensive Plan during the first
annual review process. -
Steerinq Committee of Elected Officials The GMA gives counties the authority to adopt population projections and establish UGAs.
However, the Countywide Planning Policies requires that the Steering Committee of Elected
Officials make a recommendation on population projections, allocations and UGAs to the
County Commissioners. The Steering Committee meets on November 16, 2005 and will
discuss the following issues (see attached Steering Committee Meeting Agenda).
1. Steering Committee technical sub-committee presentation (see attached minutes
from August 10 and September 7 meetings). .
F-~ 2. Joint Planning Areas Discussion (see attached Draft Joint Planning Agreement
between Spokane Valley and Spokane County).
` 3. Population allocation discussion. .
4. Recent Urban Growth Area remand decisions (see attached letter from Mayor
Wilhite to Spokane County).
5. Land Quantity Analysis
6. Transportation Mitigation/Concurrency Discussion
Deputy Mayor Munson chairs the meeting and is seeking input from the City Council on the
topics. The topic of joint planning areas has received significant Council discussion, including at
a joint Council-Board of County Commissioners meeting. Following is some background
inforrnation on the other agenda items, which may be helpful to Council members as they
consider the issues.
Countywide Population Proiection: The GMA requires Counties to adopt a population projection
within the Low, Intermediate and High range as projected by the Office of Financial
Management (OFM). County Planners are being directed to use the OFM high projection of
657,946 people for the 2025 County population projection. This would equate to a 1.83%
compounded annual growth rate from 2000 to 2025 (the 2000 County population was 417,939).
At a recent Planning Director's meeting, representatives expressed reservation about using the
high number based upon historical growth pattems. Consensus of the Planning Director's
group was to use the intermediate 2025 OFM projection, or 561,627 people. This equals a
1.24% compounded annual growth rate from the years 2000 to 2025.
From 1990 to 2000, Spokane County greuv from 361,364 to 417,939 people, a total increase of
15.7% (approx_ 1.47% compounded annual growth). From 1995 to 2005, Spokane County
grew from 401,200 to 436,300 people, a total increase of 8.75% (approximately .85% .
compounded annual growth). . The population projection is important because it provides the foundation for all planning to
follow, including establishing Urban Growth Areas and planning for capital • facilities. This •
decision will *therefore have a significant impact on the City's budget and work plan priorities.
After the Countywide population projection is established, 'rt is then divided among all
jurisdictions, including the County. The population allocations will be used, in part, to size
Urban Growth, Areas. Jurisdictions are expected to make a presehtation to the Steering -
Committee for proposed population allocations at the November 16, 2005, meeting.
Land Quantitv Analysis: Jurisdictions are expected to update the Steering Committee on their
land quantity analysis. This important analysis quantifies the amount of buildable land supply
within current city limits and, subsequently, the number of people that can be accommodated
within the city. Planning Staff conducted this analysis approximately one year ago during initial
development of the comprehensive plan and is prepared to update the data for the County's Comprehensive Plan update. _
Urban Growth Areas: At a future meeting, the Steering Committee will review requests by cities
. and towns for adjustments to the UGA. Spokane Valley did not initially propose UGAs in its first
comprehensive plan due to issues with wastewater treatment capacity. Spokane County is
considering expansion of the Urban Growth Area. 'Proposed expansions of the UGA make it
that much more important to establish agreements between jurisdictions concerning
development impacts, i.e., Joint Planning Agreements. If, the County pursues expansion of the
UGA, Spokane Valley should be involved in the process to establish UGAs surrounding the City.
, i
OUTSTANDING POUCY QUESTIONS: 1. Countywide Population Projection - Does the Council wish to take a position on the
County's 20-year population projection? If so, staff recommends presenting a letter to
the Steering Committee of Elected Officials on November 16 stating Council's viewpoint.
2. Should Spokane Valley propose external Urban Growth Areas during Spokane County's
Comprehensive Plan update?
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Provide direction to Deputy Mayor Munson for the upcoming Steering Committee meeting.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A STAFF CONTACT: Greg McCormick, Planning Manager, Scott Kuhta, Senior Planner, Marina
Sukup, Community Development Director
ATTAC H M ENTS:
A. November 16, 2005, Steering Committee meeting agenda.
B. Steering Committee technical subcommittee minutes of August 10 and
September 7.
C. Draft Joint Planning Agreement between Spokane Valley and Spokane County
and motion proposed for Steering Committee of Elected Officials.
. D. Letter from Mayor Wilhite to Spokane County conceming UGA remand.
E. Excerpts from Council meeting minutes concerning UGAs and Joint Planning.
~
-
, 1
A
GROWTH MANAGEMENT
STEERING COMMITTEE OF ELECTED OFFICIALS
AGENDA
Wednesday, NOVEMBER 16, 2005 ~ 9:30 a.m.
City of Spokane Valley - 11707 E. Sprague - Council Chambers
1. WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS: Chairman - City Councilman Rich Munson
2. ACTION ON MINUTES FROM MEETING OF: June 30, 2005 3. PRESENTATION FROM TECHNICAL SUB-COMMITTEE REGARDING RESULTS OF THE
AUGUST 10 AND SEPTEMBER 7 MEETING (AD HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS)
Chairman - City Councilman Rich Munson: Discussiori and overview of Technical
Subcommittee review of Countywide Planning Policies, Joint Planning Area issues, and
Transportation Mitigation.
4. JOINT PLAN.NING AREA DISCUSSION: Chairman - City Councilman Rich Munson - What
are the rules and how are the County/Cities interpreting the Countywide Planning Policies
~ goveming fhis subject? .
5. POPULATION ALLOCATION DISCUSSION: Review and updafe from varrous jurisdictions.
6. RECENT URBAN GROWTH AREA - REMAND DECISIONS: Chairman - City Councilman
Rich Munson - Discussion of recent rerrrand decisions.
7. LAND QUANTITY ANALYSIS: Status Report from varrous jurisdictions
8. TRANSPORTATION MITIGATION/CONCURRENCEY DISCUSSION: Chairman - City
Councilman, Rich Munson; Spokane County Commissioner Todd Mielke
9. PUBLIC COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS
10. SET NEXT MEETING DATE AND IDENTIFY TOPICS/ISSUES FOR FUTURE AGENDAS
..___~._..L~ ~.,_«.L_ ....,._..~.~.~._..1_.._._.._. _ _ _
The Steering Committee may or may not address all items and/or may or may not continue certain items to a later session.
For more particular information, contact the Spokane County Department of Building and Planning at (509) 477-3675. All
meetings and hearings are conducted in facilities accessible to disabled individuals.
If you are submitting wriften comments for inclusion into the public record and consideration by the Steering Committee,
,-_^Csase provide sixteen (16) copies or sets of those documents.
B
GROWTH MANAGEMENT STEERING COMMITTEE '
OF ELECTED OFFICIALS
Joint Planning Subcommittee
August 10, 2005 11707 East Sprague
Spokane Valley City Council Chambers Spokane, WA 99206
Sub-committee Members Present:
Richard Munson, City of Spokane Valley, Council (Chair)
Bob Apple, City of Spokane, Council .
Matthew Pederson, City of Airway Heights, Council
Mark Richard, Spokane County, Commissioner
Sharon Colby, Spokane County Fire District No. 3
Staff Present:
Chuck Freeman, City Manager, City of Ainroay Heights .
John Pederson, Assistant Director, Spokane County Department of Building
and Planning
Martin Rollins, Spokane County Prosecutor's Office'
~ Marina Sukup, Director, City of Spokane Valley, Community Development
~ ~ - Department .
Greg McCormick, City of Spokane Valley, Community Development
Department
Scott Kuhta, City of Spokane Valley, Community Development Department
Dave Mercier, City Manager, City of Spokane Valley
Mike Connelly, City Attorney, City of Spokane Valley .
Cary Driskell, Deputy C'rty Attorney, City of Spokane Valley'
Welcome and Introductions
The meeting was called to order by Councilmember Munson. Steering
Committee members and staff were introduced. Councilmember Munson noted
that Peter Barnes, Spokesman-Review reporter was in attendance.
Meeting Purpose
Councilmember Munson began the meeting with introductory remarks about joint
planning, that we need to understand what joint planning means, what would be
included in the process, and interlocal agreements. . .
Councilmember Peterson stated that he was unclear of what the intent of the
. subcommittee would be. The Countywide Planning Policies were updated last
year and the same issues were discussed then.
Mike Connelly suggested that this was an opportunity to jump start the joint
planning process. He would like to see joint planning agreements in place prior
to future expansions of the Urban Growth Area (UGA). Joint planning should
focus on the following issues, in order: ~
1. Transportation
2. Sewer and Water 3. Land Use and Zoning
. Discussion continued concerning the purpose of the subcommittee.
Staff Presentation
Greg McCormick presented an overview of joint planning. Mr. McCormick
discussed an annexation study conducted by the Washington State Department
of Community, Trade and Economic Development. The annexation study
included an interlocal agreement case study of Clark, Douglas, Kitsap and
Snohomish counties.
Councilmember Munson encouraged the subcommittee to review the materials
presented prior to the next meeting.
Subcommittee Discussion
Dave Mercier requested Spokane County representatives to clarify their views on
joint planning and UGAs, wondering if there is a basic UGA philosophy.
. John Pederson discussed the history of Joint Planning Areas, JPAs were
adopted but nothing happened after that. The challenge is the areas between
cities such as Liberty Lake and the City of Spokane Valley or Airway Heights and
the City of Spokane.
Mr. Connelly suggested that the subcommittee should:
1. Define UGA
2. Define joint planning area and who the participants in a joint planning
process should be. Clearly define control issues vs planning.issues.
3. Determine how the issues relate to annexation.
Discussion on the County's UGA philosophy continued: Councilmember
Peterson stated that Airway Heights' position is that the UGA belongs to the
County and many entities have a stake in UGAs.
Commission Richard stated that he does not believe all UGAs are intended to be .
annexed or a part of cities. There are areas that are natural for annexation and
there are areas that are not supported for annexation. Fur-ther discussion on revenues, land quantity analysis, population projections,
capital facilities and impacts of growth.
Issues for Next Mesting .
Councilmember Munson encouraged the subcommittee to do some homework
by reviewing the information presented. The next meeting should focus on a
common understanding of joint planning and we should expect the outcome of a
joint planning process would be.
Commissioner Richard suggested that the committee members consider the
' following when discussing urban growth areas and how UGA's affect all
jurisdictions including the county:
1. Impacts to community. -
2. Revenues
3. Jurisdictions should bring a map with their areas of interest.
Mr. Munson stated that the next Steering Committee meeting is on September
29, 2005 and that the subcommittee should be prepared to make
recommendations at that meeting.
The next meeting was scheduled for 9 a.m. on September 7, 2005, Spokane
Valley Council Chamber. Councilmember Munson will brinq donuts.
The meeting was adjourned at 2:30 p.m.
.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT STEERING COMMITTEE
• OF ELECTED OFFICIALS
Joint Planning Subcommittee
September 7, 2005 11707 East Sprague Spokane Valley City Council Chambers SpoCcane, WA 99206
Sub-committee Members Present:
Matthew Pederson, City of Airway Heights, Council
Mark Richard, Spokane County, Commissioner
Sharon Colby, Spokane County Fire District No. 3
. Diana Wilhite (substituting for Rich Munson)
Staff Present:
Chuck Freeman, City Manager, City of Ainrvay Heights
John Pederson, Assistant Director, Spokane County Department of Building
and Planning Martin Rollins, Spokane County Prosecutor's Office
Marina Sukup, Director, City of Spokane Valley, Community Development
Department
Greg McCormick, City of Spokane Valley, Community Development
Department
Scott Kuhta, City of Spokane Valley, Community Development Department
Dave Mercier, City Manager, City of Spokane Valley
Mike Connelly, City Attorney, City of Spokane Valley •
Stanly Schwartz, representing AinNay Heights ,
Welcome and Introductions
The meeting was called to order by Commissioner Richard. Council member
and Joint Committee Chair Munson was out of town and not available to attend
the meeting.
Interlocal Agreements Dave Mercier presented a proposed Interlocal Agreement between Spokane
Valley and Spokane County for the Turtle Creek/Morningside area. The
Committee discussed sample agreements. Mr. Rollins stated that CTED's web .
link to interlocal agreements was not worlcing. .
Discussion Items .
Commissioner Richard reviewed items for discussion for today's meeting,
including determining definitions for Urban Growth Areas and Joint Planning
Areas. A discussion on the philosophy of UGAs ensued. Mike Connelly
( ;
suggested that the issue of assigning UGAs to cities and annexation should be
separated. The question is whether UGAs should be assigned to specific cities. .
Chuck Freeman supported the designation of Potential Annexation Areas for
cities. Stan Schwartz raised concern of about the inconsistency between the Growth
Management Act and the State's annexation laws. Mr. Schwartz suggested that
2001 County resolution adopting UGAs was sufficient. The resolution identified
individual UGAs and muftijurisdictional Joint Planning Areas.
Greg McCormick discussed how west side jurisdictions have dealt with UGA
issues. Counties on the west side act as arbitrators between cities when
competing cities cannot agree on UGA boundaries and assignment. .
Dave Mercier suggested that certain UGAs are clearly of interest to single
jurisdictions and that joint planning makes sense for all UGAs.
Mr. Connelly would like to see a template for interlocal agreements that could be
used by all jurisdictions. Discussion continued concerning developing a regional
approach to traffic analysis, mitigation and impact fees.
The Committee came to general agreement on the following issues: 1. All Urban Growth Areas should be Joint Planning Areas. . .
2. . The Committee should identify areas with no jurisdictional conflict. ,
3. The Committee should identify areas that have conflicting interests. 4. Modeling should be utilized to identify transportation impacts within
UGAs. .
5. Interlocal agreements should specify development standards and the ,
permitting authority with UGAs.
6. Countywide Planning Policies should include language that an
interlocal agreement is a precursor to expansion/modification of the
UGA The subcommittee decided to keep the September 29, 2005 Steering Committee
meeting and will report on the progress. Mike Connelly will prepare a draft
motion for the Steering Committee to consider concerning joint planning.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 a.m.
C
~ ~DRAFT 9/6/05
Interlocal Affeement I2elZardiua Joint Planninr, behveen the City of Spokane
. Vallev and Spokane County
'Y'lus agreement is entcrcd into on the day of Scptember, 2005 by thc City of
Spokane Valley (Spokane Valley) and the County of Spokane (Spokane County).
On July 19th, 2005, the Spokane County Bnard oF County Cam.missioners
, aclopted ResoluNon approvring a change i.n the Spokane County
ComPre hensive Plan from iJrban Reserve to Low Density Residential for the
properly described i.n Paa-aD aph 3 be.lnw. Spol:ane Valley has exPressed conc.erns
about the impact of' thc proposed extension of the Urban Growth Arca to transportation capaciq, within the Spolcane Vallcy and possible incompatible
development standarcls anci desi;n. To avoid aay furtlter dispute And resolve the
identified concerns the parlies agree to the Fallowing:
. l. Legal basis: This aa eemenl is entereci inlo pursuant to R.CW 36.70A.010;
020(3); i i o(a); ? i o(3).(a), (b), (d), ana (r); rtcW 39.34; counrv-W;de
Planning Policics 1^or'Spokane C:ountv (Ylaruiing Policies) '1"opic 2, Uverview
o.f. Growth Ivfaaiagement A.ct( GMA) R.equirelnents; 'Copic 2, 1'olicies (1) and (2); 'I'opic 5.'l'ransportation, Overview of Growch N[Anagement (GNCA)
Requirements; Glassary Cauntywide Planning Policy Terms, JQint Planning
A.reas; Spokane Valley Interim Comprehensive Plan; Spokane County
Compr.ehensive Flan.
2. Ares affceted: The aareernenl applies to thal portion of Spokane County -
J generally located south of Turtle Creek, 'we_st of Barkcr, north of 32nd and
east- of Chapman 12oad and more specifically described in Exhibit 1, attached hercto and by this reference incorporated hcrcin.
. 3. Tutent: It is the inteut of tlie parties, 1) to promote coorduiated planai_ug for
transportation and dcvclopmcnt standards bciwccn the Spokane Valley and
Spokwic CoLUity for the area affectcd; 2) to cnsiirc that transportation impacts
resulting from dcvelopmcnt in the affected arca are iclentified and that
adequatc funding is provided for to pay for the costs of improvements made
necessary by these iuipacts, and 3) to ensure that clevelopuient stanciards for
streels, siclewall:s, curbing, drainage anci ucilities are campatible vvith . standards existing and planned f.or by Spokane Valley. Spokane Valley and
Spokanc CoLuity desire ta j4intly establish and implement cievelaPment
regulations and procedures gUverning the review and approw-al of
subdivisions, shorl subdivisions and conclit7anal lancl uses wiChin this af(et;ted
a.rea. The parties also desu-e to jointly establish and implement developmcnt
regulations and procedures goventing the provision of public facilities Nvithui .
the UGA prpPerty in question. Spokane Valley and Spokane County agree to
coiiunit sufficicnt staff to draft and finalizc these•specific agreements within '
180 clays af exeeution of this agreement. The parties also reeagnize khai
immecliate land use development in this area without a jaint planning
agrEemEnt govern.ing the same Nvill fi-ustaate_ the purpose zuid intent of ihis
agreement anci the clevelopment regulat.ions and proeeduzes to be establislleci.
Consequently, Spokane Valley and Spokane County ag•ee to the follovving
unmediatc measures:
4. Transportation:
a. The parties recogiuze that:
i. Development in ei[her the Spokane Valley or Spokxue County
ereates potential impacis f'or inxersections and comdors in the
adjacenE jur.isdictiou. ii. 1`he area i-n question contains approximately 244 acres of
, undcvelopeci land and additional Property that is
. undcrdcveloped in light of proposed neNv density staudards (6 .
horries per ac•re.)
•iii. '1'hat.the total build out of tlus area, cstimating 4 homes per
acres f4r the undeveloped propertics and no additional build
. out for thc developed areas would allo« the construction of
976 new homes resulting ui 10,736 daily autbmbbile trips.
iv. "1'hat this increased velucular traffic will have an impacf on 1he
intersections ajid roadways within Spokane Valley, including
but not limited tn the inlersections of Sullivfui.and Sprague,
Sullivan anci Saltese ancl the l3arkcr ltoad and 1-90
~ intercliangc.
b. In order to ensure sufficient fiulds to pay for the uuproveuients '
• ucccssitateci by these impacts the parties a„rce to the followino:
i. Each development application for a subdivision; shArt
subciivision or conditional land use Pennit that conteinplatcs 20
or more livuig units, or PUD application of any size, shall
witlun _ working days of subinission be provided by Spokane
County to the Spokane Valley Community Development
Dircctor.
ii. Spokane County sliall require ttic applic.anl fbr each
cievelepment proposal describcd in "i" above to prepare aud
provide to Spvkane Valley and Spokane County a Traffic
Impact Ana1ysis (TIA) quantifying th.e impact of that
devclopmcnt. "fhe scope of that TIA shall be approveci by .
Spokane Valley. .
~ ;
iii. Spokane Valley shalJ be provided ~Nit,h any enviroiunental .
checklist; or other request rnadc pursuant to RCW 43.21 C et
seq for properkies within thc affected area within _Nvorki_ng
days of submission.
iv. Spol:atie Valley shall hdwe noticc of and be able to attend any predevelopnient conFerence ancVor develaPment conference
witti respect to developmcnt proposals described in "i" above
or any PiJD proposals.
v. Spokane County after consult:ation with Spokane Valley shall
uiclude in its recommended couditions of approval to the
Hearui; Exanuner or other appropriate hearing body a
' condition requiring appropriate financial contributions for
direct tiansportation impacts to Spokane Valley identificd 'ui
, tlie TIA prePared for cach project. vi. Spokanc County after consullation with Spokane Valley Shall
include in its recornmended conditions of approval to the ~
I3earii-ig Fxaniner or otlier. appr.opriate hearing body a
eondition setting forth the timc, maiuier and .means of
• t:ransierence of any payment intencied to compensate Spokane
VaUey for identified traL'ric impacts.
vii. Spokane County recognizes that to implement tlus lgreement
some modification of existing land use rcgulations may be
required and agrees to ma.ke such modifications writhin _ da.ys
of eaecutiori of this agreement.
5. Dcvelopment Staudards:
a. Spokane County agrees to adopt -vvzthin _ days of thc exectrtion oF
tlus agreement, the Spokane Valley street stanclards, as well as
' staiidards for cirainage, storm water and utilily clesign and location for
the affectecl area as are sel farth in E.Yhibit 2 attached hereto and
~ ~ .
~ J incorporated herei.n. ]'rior to the eFCective dace of this iegislation
Spokanc Caunly agrees to recouuncnd to the Hearing Examiner or
other appropriate hearing body that development within the affected
m-ea be consistcnt with the Spokane Va11ey Staudards discussed above.
h. Spokaue County agrees to con.('er with Spokane Vxlley prior to finalization of the necessity .for and/or the location of any connector
strccts and/or the classificakion of any streets withi.n or adjaceut to a
proposcd development pr adjac;ent to the boundaries of Spokane
Valley. If agreemcnt is not reached resuleing in joini recommendation
to the hearing Exanuuer or othcr appropriate hearing body both parties
shall present their respective positions to thc Hcaring Examiner or •
- c>lher app.rap.riate hearing body.
c. Spokane Counly agrees to adopt, NWitlun _ ciays of eYecution of tius
agre,ement, t:he Spokane Valley -1'CJD ordinance which is sct forth in
Eahibit 3, attached hereto and incorporated h.erein, as to PUD of this
legislation Spokane Cotulty agrees to recommend tn the hearing
Examiner or other appropriate body; t}iat devclopmcnt within the
affecled area be consisrent witli the PUl7 ordinmice sct forth above.
6. Other Regulations: a. Nothing in this agreement sha11 supersede or negate any cxisting land
' use or dcvelopmenl regulation for Spolc.-uie Valley or Spokatie County.
7. Additional Agrccmcnts: . a. T'he parties contempJate fuhirc joint phunning agreemenLs that inay
relate to the affected area of other portions oF Spokane County and/or
Spokane Vallcy. Nothing in lhis agree.ment is intended to prohibit t}ie
devclopment Uf Future agr.eements relating to either the impacts .
identit:ied above or other impacts that may now or in the future exist.
8. 12i;hts reserved:
a. Nothing in tlZese agreements is intended to waive or limit thc rigits of
the partics to require miligation for aiiy impact as allowed by federal, state or loc,al laws or ordinances including hut not lunited to
cnviroimiental i.mpacts governed by 43.2 l C.O 10 et seq.
9. Accounting of L+"xistin ; Fees:
a. That Spokxne County shall within 60 days of execution of t}us
agrecment prpvide an accowiting of all fees paid to mitigate impacts to
interseclions or roadways currently xN7thin Spokane Valley along with
the disposition of tllose funds.
10. Changc in Standards or Ordinances:
a. Any changc in Spokane Valley or Spokane COIIIIty staiidards 4r
ordinances relied upon in this a€rccment shall be «!ithin _ working
days ot' passage forwarded to the okhez parly. If the parties caimot
agree to thc implementation of these standards -vith.u130 days the issue . '
may bc iuunediately set for mediation by either party.
U. Meciiation of Uisputes:
a. Airy disputes arisi.ng from this agreement, including the failure to
- agrcc as to new standards and/or applicable ordinances as is sEt forth
ilt paragrapll 10 above, sha.ll be set for mediation ,%zt:hin 30 days of
notification of a disput•e. If inediation is unsuccessful then the partics
• -agree to arbitration pursuant tr) RCW 7.60.010, to be held NArith 60 ciays
of the dale mediation is aba.ndoned.
12. Iudenini.fication and Liabil.ity:
' a. Spakane County shall proiect, save,harmlcss, indemnify and defend, al
, its oAqi eYpense, Spokane Valley, its elected a.nd apPointed officials,
oCficers, employces xnd agents, .f_rom any loss or claun for damaaes of _
any nature whatsocwer arising nut of Spokane County's performance
of this agreement, iucluding claims by the Spokane County
eiiiployee's or tlurd pa-ties, except for those damagcs causeci solely hy
. the ne;ligence or wil(fu] miscanduct of Spokane Vallcy, its elected
anci apPoulted officials, officers, employees, or agents.
' b. Spokane Valley shall protect, save harmless, indemnify and defend, at
ils oNvn e.rpense; Spokane County its elected and appointcd officials,
dH:icers, employees and agents, fram any lnss or claim for damages of
any na[ure 4vhatsoever arisiiig out of Spokane Valley's performanc;e of
this agreement, including clauns by the Spokane Valley employee'S or
tbir.d parties, eYCept for those ciamages caused solely by the ne;ligencc
or willful misconcluct of Spokane County, its elecled and appoinfed
officials, oHicers, einployees, or ageuts.
c. ln thc event of liability t:nr damages of any nature whatsoevcr arising
out of the pert"ormance of this Agreement by Spokane Courity and
Spokane Valley; including c;laims by Spokane County's or Spokane
Valley's av%rn officers, officials, cmployccs, agenls, volunteers, or thi.rd
pac-ties, catised by or resulting f_rom the concurrcnt negligcnec of
Spokane county and Spokane Valley, each parties liabilit}, hcretuidEr
shall only be to tlie eYtent of that party's negligence. A. No liability shall tie attached to Spokane County or Spokane Valley by
re;ison of entering into t}ais agrccment except as eapressly provided herein.
13. Sevcrability: Tf any provision of this agreement or its application to any
person or circumstance is held invalid, the remaiider of thc provisions ancVor
the application of the PrOvisions to other persons or circumstances shall not be
affccted.
14. Lntire flgrccmcnt: This agreeinent constifutes the entire agreeinent berivecn
the parties with respECt to the affecled properiy. It is aiiticipated that the
partics wiftcntcr into Furthez interloca] agreements on spccific subject areas as
`~-J indicated above. '
MOTION IZLCONL~%fFNTaING JOINT PLANVV[1jG FO12 EXISTING tjR13AN
GRONNTTH ARE.t1S ANUTU FUR.THER RECONL1.Nl)TING T14A°1° :COINT PLANiI'NG
AGREEMENTS SHOULll T3E IN PT.,ACE P1710R TO AP]'ROVAL OF T'UTURF
UK]3AN GR.OWTH E1IZEt1S
Mrhercas, the Gra,~vkh v[anagEment Steering Committce of Electeci Of'ficials (Steering
Cc2mmittec) has formed a sub-c4rn_mittec to review issueS surrounding joint planning and ,
urbaii growlh areas; aud
NVhereas the subcommittEC has uiet on the 1 Oeh af August, 2005 and 9th of Septembcr,
2005 to discuss these issues; and
Whcreas, the Steering Committce recognizes that LLrban dcvelopmznt «7thout joint
planning may result i.n un..funded impacts to adjacent jurisdictions as well as uicousistent
development standards in areas where fiiturc aruieYation is possible; and
«rhereas, the Sleering Coriunittee recogn.i-r..es that a numbcr of UUA's are adjacent to a
single .jiuisdictions anci joint planning would clearly he appropriate between Spokane _
Courity and that juriscliction; and
Whereas, the jurisdictions fucther reeognizc that other UGA'S may impact both Spokane
County and *more than one inunicipal jurisdiction requiri.ug jnint planning bctvveeu all
affected jurisdictions; and ,
Whercas, the jurisdictions recognizc tliat tying the issue oE joint placuung aD eements to
the issuc of fiiture annexation ha.S resulted in disagreements as to spccific applications oF
the law and sigcuficant conflicts over 1'utLLrc revenues with the end restilt beiug a
collective i.nability to draft a.nd finalize necessary joint plaiuiin; ag-zeements; and .
Whereas; the Steering Coronuttee Nvish's to sepsrate; Nvithout prejudicc to sny
jurisdiction, the issue of Futiire anncxations arld the legal authority and right to pLUSUe -
- such aruiexations f_rom the issue of joi.nt planning ta facilitate the drafti.ng and execution
oF_joillt plat]I11itg aa eements;
Now, Therefore, the Stecruig Conunittee recpmrnends the followuig: .
1. That all jurisdictions iiiuiiedi7tely bsgin the process oi' drafting and. finalizing joint
planni.ng agreements for. existing Urban Growth Axeas. Areas where a single
municipality and Spokane Councy are the intcrested jurisdictions should bc completed
within 6 uionths of passaje of this motion. Areas where rivo or more municipalities have
an interest shall witluzi 6 months of passage of tlus motion identify thc zones where
coiiunon iuter.esl5 lie and Nvitliui 12 mont:hs of passage of this motion complctE and
- cxccute a joint planning agrecment. It is understood that these uutial agreements may
net be comprcheiisive or identify and resolve all joint planning issues birt should in a
address the issucs af transportation impacts and desig-n standards. It is intendcd that the
partics continue to review and revise these agrEements as needed.
2. That, norivithstand'uig language containe_d in thc County-Wide Planning Policies for
Spokane County, Glassary Countyvvide planning Policy Terms defuung "Joint=Ylaiuung
Ar.eas", which slates:
• Joint Ylanning Areas - areati designated a5 Urban Growth Areas assizned to
a city or town for future urhan devclopment but 1ocated in the
unincorporated county where a coordiuated planning process bchvccn thc
cities, towns and the County will be conducted." atpage 47
The adoption of a joint planning agrecmcnt shall not be considered as evidence in supporc
of or in opposition to, the Future annexatian of any specific area nor shall any jurisdiction
entering inco such an agreement waive any right to appeal and/or to ptusue or oppose
annexation ef1'ores or any alher cause of actinn available under state or federal law tuiless
specifically restricted by the terms of any such agreeruent.
3. That further, prior to final approval of any future CXtEilSlOll of Urbau Grovv-th
Boundaries Sppkane Counly require that a joint planning agreement be exeeutcd betvviceu
the affected jurisd.ictions..
< <
D
Niojiane . .
. 11707 E Sprague live Suite 106 ♦ Spokane'Jatley ;'JA 992Qb •
' . 509.921.1000 ~.Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhaUQspokanevalley.org •
August 30, 2005 ' - • . _
. Board of C{ounty Cornmissiop.ers ofSpokane County J
, 1116w. Broadway . ' • , , . . . Spoka.nc, WA. 99260 . . .
Members of the Roard of Counfy Couumissioncr's of Spokane Couztty: -
. ' . .
, I aui provi,di.ng these comznents at thE direcfiion of the City Coir.acilof the City of
Spokane Valley. . - . . . . . : •
: • : s.° :
'~e Ci.ty of Sgokane Vallcy ba.~'re~iewed the ~'i.ndings.oCk'act A.nd.T~ecisioii; Ia-The_. ,
V1atter Of Aciovtiug Specific Amcndments T'o T'he Suokacie Couiitv. Coinprelien'sive Plan
. #5 0649, adopted on July I9th, 2005. T'he particular portion of that decis'zon i:mpacfing'
the C`ity of Spokane Va11cy is re{'erenced as No. 03-CPA-51, Saltese La.ke.
This a.rea e.ncompasses approximately4X9 acres o£which 244 acres arc currently . '-undeveloped. Unplanned deveIopxncnt of the azoa will havc a significant adverse impact
on the abiliry of the City of Spoka.ne Val.ley to proN'icie 'transportation services ar ta '
enstire compafibla zoning and d.evelopment standards in areas adjacent ta the City of
Spoka.nE Val.ley.
, Concerns about this Comprehensive. Plan chauge ,vere eYpressed to the County on .
February 5,2004 in cpzr.esPond.cnc,e [a Paul Jensen as Scnior Pldnner by \!faa.ina .Sukup, - .t1.-ie Director of Com.muaity :Dcvelopn.ient for the City trk' Spokane Valley auci abaui on
.Twse 3 Ofih, 2005. i_u correspondec.ce to Jiin Manson, as .Director of the S,pokaue.Councy
F3ui.ldin; and Planuiv.g l7epartm.enf $•bm Gregory McCormack, the 2'Ifuuuiig ~Nfahagec bor .
the City of Spokane Val.ley. In both letters the necessityfoz inter juri.sdictional
coordination is identified as a critical part of complyi.ng with the CYrowti Management
Act as well as ensuri.tig the continued fin.ancial sectuity of botb. the CiYy_of S' okaue _
Valley and Spok,ane County. It was aLso xEquested fihat an eYpa.nsiou of the UGA. such as
~ i:his be first reviewed by the Steerin.g CoinmittcE of. Elected OfficiaIs. .
,Becauseth.is reeent Lnat"rer was passed N~vithout suicielit n.otice to the City o£ Spokarze .
. Valley or* without any iuvolvement of the Steeri.ng Commitfiee of Elecfed Officials this
zlecessary pla.~ung azid coordination was neither uutiafed nor completed. • •
It is our understa.uding thaf th-- time to challenge this recent action expi.r.es on or about the
16th day. o.f September: The Ci'Ly of Spokan-. Valtey, has repeatecily cx.pressed its . cominifiment to wark Airh the County ou th.i.s aud a zn.yz-i.acl of otIier issues. We do naf '
cTtish to enter into a p.rotr.acted l.itigation if it caLi be avoideci. .
Accozdi.ngly, we ea.-tencl to Spokane County an offer to imnediatelybEgin negotiating a
joint pIanning agreezuent, l.izn.ited to this specific area, as an alterBative fio lifiigation. We
real.ice that fiine is short but feel a good faifh effort could zesult in a;pre.li.mi.nary .
agreem.en.t di,scussi.ng the areas of tra.nspoztafiion impacts and development sta,ndarcZs prior
fo the 16th of September. We have instructeci nur C.ity Manager, Dave.vZercier to engage
. City staff i.n an e£fort to complete such ari agrecmeut. IIoj5eful'ly it will set the iozr.na't for
a more.comprehensi.ve joi.nt plauling agreemeut adclressi.ng a.1[ developmcnt issues fac.in;
the City of Spokane Valley and Spokane County, as well as other atTected jurisdictions. .
. tiVe aNvait your response. ~ • .
. . . . . . , . . -
Mayor .Diana `Vilhite , .
, .
at:66 d'u`er.tioiii'bCth. e City Coiuicif-1. • . . ; . . • . . .
'City'of Spokau `e.' ~Valley
. . . ,r. , .
~ ' , . . . . . . . . . , . _ " ' ` . • .
. , . i • . . . . i - . . ' ' . • ' 1 . • . ' . • • . _ . „ . : , ' . . . . . •
. . , 4 , . . .
- . . /
E
Four eacerpts from Council meeting minutes regardir►g Urban Crotivth:
Octnber 28, 2003 Kegular Vleeting:
10. fteporl on Proposed Activities in the Urban Growth A.rea (UGA) t?eriveen Spnkane Valley arid i_:iber[y
I akc
Communiry Uevelopment Uirector Sukup explained the purpose of fFiis repnrt is to discuss where; T iberl:y
T ake ancl Spokarie Vallcy are in die deterrnination of shared borderlines and urban gro-wth areas. She
then briefly explained the planning policies of the County, thc goals of the GroNvrth Vlanagemenl Act, and
the City's interim plan provisions and how to cietennine what oue interests are in Chis arca, including
control of the gatcway to the community. City Manager Mercier addetl lhat it is clcar that Liberty 1,ake
has certain corporate interests at play in the proposed annerat:ion, and property owmers have certain
interescs as c1oe5 [he developer, so thcrc arc at least four sets of corporate interests dealino with the
t.erritory bch<<een our boundaiy and dhat of Liberty Lace. Mr. Mercier sitia that there is a search for better
ideas that would reasonably accommodate Hhe legitimate interesCS of all parties involved; that a proposal
was made to lnland Empire Paper Company that would meet the corporate interesl of Spokane Valley as
. well a,s the others that have been expressed. He explainecl thal I:his tcrritory, which is essentially
residential, would be parf of lhe anncxation proposal attached to Liberty Lake which would not adversely
affect our corporatc interest, and that the other areas including the industrial pmperty and the ga1:eway
feature of the sbuthern portion of l:he land awnership of Inland Fmpire would weigh well to the advantage
of Spokane Valley, and that proposal is being cnnsidered> He acldecl tliat the parties will be back t:o us
within a few weeks to determine if an appropriate balance of interest can be determinecl, at which time
furthcr options will be presented to council to gain additional sti►ff direetion. City Manager Rlercier also
mentioned that City Attoniey Schwarrz left dhe rnom prior to the beginning nf this discussion anci will
come back afterwards, as he.hiis recused hirnself frorn representing either party (City oCLiherty 1_.ake and
~ the City oC Spakarie Vallcy) on di is particular issue.
Juue 7, 2005 Stucly Session: 3. Srokane Gounky Comprehensive Plan Uudate and Urban Growth Round.iry- Vtarina Sukua
As explainE;c1 in her June 7 rnemorandum, Tairect4r Sukup indicated there is no new inforniation to
provide; that she met with County planning direcCors over Ia.st the severa) months; that the Aoarcl of
Caunty Commissioners indicafecl Ihey arc looking for a population range of a set wnount and thc proposal
t:o accornnlpdate that population; that the proposal would be lo expancl thc Urban Croivth Area (UGA) by .
over eleven square miles; although there may be some aclji.ist:mcnts. She mentioned that she will continuc
to monitor t.hc proccss.
August 30, 2005 Study session:
5. i rhan Gr wth F.xpansion Consideration - Mike Connellv ~
City Atl:orney Cnnnelly explainecl t.hat 13nc1 use dccisions can have unintended anc1/or unanticipated
consequences, and that Council may want to consicler Gaking some action regarding Spokane Count:y's
act:ion to change [he gray area shown on the attached map, from Urban Reserve to Low Density
Residential; whicli would eatenci tfiat urbiin gro«nti bouridary to the outside of the perimeter of t:hose
properlies, whereas before it went insicle of the perimeter of those properties. Two components to
consicler when making such deeision, Mr. Connelly said, include is it subsftintive or appropriate for an
urban growth area, tind cloes it fit the eriteria for a need for low density residential property and the abiliry
tn provide service3 to lhat property; and t.he sccond consideration is procedural, as is there something in
the manner in which it was clone, somel}ling Council wishes to object to. In de.aling wiCh thc substantive
issue, Mr. Conrielly explaincd that this particular change would allow a.chttnge_in clcnsity from one unit
per five acres or ten arcas, to six unitis per acre it if were built out at << m~~~cimum dcrisity. vlr. Connelly
explained that this translates in terms of traffic, to approximately 10,000 vehicular trips if all property ,
were built out at the maximum density. Presently, approximately one-half of the property is already
develoned at urban dcrisities, he cxplained, and there arc either threc or four units per acre on the properly nn the furthest north edge of the proposed are<i,
City Attorney Connelly said that the most significant impact to consider is that oP Ir,iffie impacts; dist
t:here are adjacent intersectians which might be impactecl ancl where tFie levcl of service could*diminish:
the Sprague/Sullivan intersectinn and the intersection at Saltese and Sullivan_ Without a jaint; planning
agreement, Mr. Connelly said the full developmenC oF the are<< could have sevcral consequences: (1)
developrrient would likely rnake if more difficult for properties wilhin tlic city to rneet concurrency, which
is limited with existing roads and intersections; and whether die development is in the County or the Cily,
and if it impacts intersections within the City it consumes that concurrency; iind if this dcvelons without
any type of financial partieipation by the cioveloper co kt,e cut,t,ty, it would consume the concurrency.
Attomey Cnnnelly aclcled that without any type of jnint planning agreement, there is also an issue ot'
whether the development and desianer standards would be cornpatible or incompatible resulting in
substantial costs if the area were ever annexed tn the City of Spokane Valley. Mr. Connelly said water
and scwer do not appcar to be a problcrn in t:he area. Regarding procedural issues, Mr. Connelly gave a
brief history of the area: he explained that the request for the UGA change by the property owncr was first
macle iri 2003 at about the samc tirne that applications for some of the existing developments were
suhmitted; that the Planning Cornmission recommended denial and that this area be considered tts a part
of the five-year plan, the County Commissioners within a few minutes oP deliberation, upheld the
F'Ianninb Cornmissioner's recommendation to deny lhe tirbiin grow1:h area extension. That decision was
appealed by dhe property owner to die Eastei-ii Washington Grotivth Managemenl Hearings 13oii'ds, as i_}ie
' property owner Pell' t.hey met the burden oF need to a populat.ion allocation study and through the proof that there were sufficient services and diat it would npt have a negative impact on traffic services. Mr.
Connelly said that the only evidence he fotmcl in the record regarding traffic was a lctter trom Ross Kelly
indicating that the improvernent of certain roadways within the area would benefit Sulliviin as il woulci fimnel traC6e to F3arker Road.' tAfter lhe appeal, Attorncy Connelly cxplained, there was a settlement
betNveen the parties and the County, and they agreed to bring the matter back for a suhsequent hcaring f'or
remimd; in Jime of 2005 the matter was brought back before the County Commissioners and was
approved by the County Cornrnissioners, along with about five other areas in similar circumstanc;es.
Mr. Coniiclly slid regarding process, t}ie issue of notice was raised as the County did not send notice to
the olher jurisdictions, ineluclin; the City of Spokane Valley; the anplicanf advised Mr. Connelly that diey'
mailed notice to properly owners widiin 400 feet of the proposed property location whicM - was
apprpxirnately 1,000 mailings; and thcy fclt that at least one of those property oNvners was the City of
Spokane VaIley. Mr. Cannelly said he has not: yct been ablc to fiurtlter trac.e that to confirm if it was
received by the City of Spokane Valley. Mr. Connelly saiil that: t:he property was posted in tvvo locations.
'1"he erCension of [his particulzir UGA bounclary was not, said Mr. Connclly, presentacl or considered by
the Spokane County $teering Committee of Elected Officials anci that he believes there is a dispute
bettiveen Spokane County and some other members of that committee as to whether lhese tyne,s of
changes should be submitted to them; but that this particulzir ehange was not, vlr. Connelly said that the
last factar for Council consideration is that there has been one appeal filed by a neighborhood group,
Kathy Mitke, and a neighborhood group with respect to the Five Mile Prairie matter but not with respec.t
to the Turlle Creek matter.
Attorney Connelly then outlined several policy decisions for Council to consider. (1) do noChing ancl let
the decision stand and the praperty would likely be developed at urban densities over a period of tirnc;
and if ihar is the dec;ision, Council wauld be able to participate at the hearing level, but the eff'ectiveness
of doine so without a joint planning agreemcnt would be questionable regarding whether Council could '
epnvinee the Hearing Examiner that Council's conceiiis are legitimate as without an agreement, there
` «<ould be no document guiding his decision. Vir. Connelly Said Council could also (2) appea) to the
" Eastern Washingtnn GroNvth Vlanagement Hearings Board; that Board does not approve or disapprove
projects, but their duty would be to determine if flie proce,ss complied with state law; and if there were
sutrcient procedural issues to demonstrate noncompliance, the rnatter would be sent back to be clone
eorreetly. Thiit cloes noC mean, however, said Mr. Connelly, that this area would not be an urban growth
area, but would mean tliat the process getting there was not done correctly. A successfiil appeal would
also bring to the City of Spokane Valley, slid Attorney Connelly, the oppdrtunity to prescnt additional
facts in evidence, if it was felt there was a substantive case to reject this area as an urban growth area; or
having another hearing with proper notice would cnaUle t:he'presentation of evidence regarding traffic
impacls and any other issues council may fee) would be determinative in designtit;ing the area a UGA.
Attorney Cormclly deseribcd that a the thirci (3) option would be to contiiiue to negotiate a joint planning
agreement wit}h the County, adding that siich agreement wo.uld provide a mechanism for funding of traffic
improvements, and for development and design standards compatible with die City ot' Spokane Valley's
standards in the event of any fttture annexation.
Discussion ensued regarding which areas miglit be directly impacted and of the need Cor a trafiTic iinpact '
analysis; the number of vehicular trips due to the 976 homes; capilal Facilitics plan, land use analysis and
traffic litigatipn c4nsiderations when considering UGA expansion.
Septcmher 13, 2005 Regular VTeeting:
6. Mation Consideration: Rccerit 13oard of County Co►nrnissioncrs' Decision Fxpanding,Nei~hborin
Urban Crowth Area (Joint PlanningAgreenient 0, r Ai eal =Mike Connellx
It ►vus moved by Councilmember Uenenrry arid secandetl by Coirrtcihrieniber I%lunibun 10 j)ur,rue the
i uctioir ro apPc~rcl tht-, clcckvran orr the p~irt of the Caunty reburtlirrg !he Url,urr Grntivfli Areas arPd 11Te
~ change fran llrbmi Reserve to loiv Density Residenlial itt the lJrbrni Gro►vth l3aurulary. City Attoniey
Connelly explained that he has not received a response to the proposed Joint Planning Agreement he
submitted to the County la.st Wednesday; that aIthough there is no agreement to presenl tonighf, he and
the comrniltcc rncrnbcrs of tMc stccring cornmittee had a prodiactivc meeting at which time the agreement
was submitted to that committee; that the issue before Council tonight is whether tn f le IawsuiC; Chal the
notice of publicalion wtis July 23, 2005, making the 60'b day September 21, 2005; and if Council wants to
filc, hc recornmends doing so prior Co thal clale, preferably by the end of the week to ensure all
appropriate steps are taken. City Attoniey Connelly then explained the consequences of taking either
action, anc3 lhat eilh4r iietion wotild be aeting wilhin the bounds of the law.
Mr. Connelly explained that if Council accepts the UGA as is, Without sn appeal, there would be an urban
growth area to the southern boundary of the City liniits; that such an area vvo«Id not be designatecl a joint
planning area but merely zn urban growth flres; it may have an impact on firture annexation; tfiat Spokane
County has put the City of Spokane on notice that dhey consider the urban gro,,vth v-eas that are not joint
planning arca5; but that the Coun[y has.nol made a similar stxlemenl to us. Mr. Corinelly said if the .
Urban Growth Area is in place, there may be a lack of leverage to force a joint planning agreement ancl he
added ihat the County appcars to hc pursuing the concept: of joinC planning in good faith. Attorney
Connelly said it could make a difference in our ahility to assess compensation or impose Fnaneial burdens
on developments in the County to compensate us for transpottation impacts within our CiCy. Mr.
Connelly,furlher explained that we still have the ability to attend the hearing and raise all issues by SEPtA
or other laws to show that this development would have an impact in pur_jurisdiction and we wish to ask
that the development be ccanditioned; but we would he doing so without an agreement with the County.
He explained that in this case, ours and the County's development standards arE; sirnilar with the
difference being that private roadways be built tn public roauf standards, and that therc rnay bc a
" difference once ttic PU[a ordiriance is adopted as t:o conditions and the rTiechanisms within that PUD
ordinance which might he ciifferent from the County, but in all other pmliculars, the County and our
standards are the same as we adopted the Cnunty'S sfanclarcts. ~
i
vlr. Connelly said if we appeal the case and lose, then we ,vould be iri the sFUne place as if Nve had not
filed the 9ppeal. If we appeal the case .3nd wiri, Mr. Connelly said there is a substantittl likelihood t.hat
this area will be an urban groNvth area anyway once they go back through the process; and also a
substantially likelihond it will be a joint planning area wit:h our City. The possible le<<erage with
neookiacion over a joinl planning agreement may cxist, .he said, if Council feels leverage is an issue;
development standards is something which you have a greater chance of imposing on an area in the
County by agreement through a joint planning agreement, and transpariat:ion impacts ►night be easier
-addressed if it were dnne pursua.nt to an agreement wit}i the County. tlnother factor to consider, Mr.
Connelly explainetl, is Mr. Dahrn has fled an application under the existing law, and if thi►t is a c;amplete
application, he would be vested; and regarding his development, it would likely move fomvard anyway;
but it rnay bc consiclerecl noncoriforming fbr sorne tirne while the,jurisdictions fight over the desi~,*nation.
Nlr. Connelly said Council may pull the appeal at any time within their discretion, or could enter into an
agreernent with the County; anci t}iat the Growrth Management Fiearing Boflrd Ilas a statutory limit of 180
days in which to make a decision from the time the petition is filed; that: Chc partie;s can request and the
BUt3l'd COUICI n'ant f'Or gUOd CAUSE, A COnt:lnUation but they try not to as land use decisinns are eirnely. Mr.
Connelly said he ha,.s receivcd a positive response from the Counry regarding the concept of joint
planning; that the problem everyone faces is we kept tying the cancepl of joinC pl.innino witli annexation;
and if we can agree to separate those, M.r. Cnnnelly saicl he feels a joint planniiig agreement is likely.
Mr. Connelly further explaincd that any joint plsnning agreement would be bindinb; it would havc the
"teeth" council would agree it has, t.hat the proposal sent to the County speaks of notice and involvement
so ttiat our City would }tave rnorc th.3n adcquatc notice qf any application within the affec[ecl area.; lhat •
they would be able to attend pre-development meetings; they would be notificd of any environmental
acl:ions with eriough response t:irrie tU appeal those; that a second impact deals widi traffic impact5 and
there would be a joint effart between the City and the Cotmty Co prescnt t:o the hearing examiner
c.onceming the irnpact ancl co seek a solut:ion for that irnpact, whether SEPA or impacC fees. In response
to a question f"rom Councilrnernber FIatUaatl, Mr. Connelly said he believes that the lecter we scnt to the
County has not yet been bmught up on an agenda of tfieirs. If the clevelopment is going to move forward,
the point of f ling suit would be one of process; and M.r. Connelly said it would. end up with au► urban
gruwth area t:hat had joint pl:nning that was also designated as a joint planning area if we were
successful, ss opposed to an Urb:►n growtli area without joint planning being required; anci depending on
the scope of t.he application, Mr. Connelly said there cUuld be othcr issues to ta.ke under consideration, but
. it is more of a process as opposed to trying to stop specific development; lhat it would be brought before
the Gro~vth Msriagement Hearing Boaed and not a suit for damages or one fileci in Superior Court, but
rather an adrninistrativc petition. Mayor Wilhite invited public comment.
Meg Arpin. 1117 E 35'h Ave, 99203: she stated that she previously delivered'l:wo letters to Council and
trusts Council has had opportunity ta review those letters; t:hat she aiid Mr. Dahm ask C;nuncil nat td take
action to appeal the County's deeisiori t:o include this; arid that she disagrees with those three things Mr.
Connelly said woulcl be seen f'rom cnterino into an planning agreement; that regarding developmcrit
standards, that Mr. Cunnelly indicated that the only dift'erence in those standards is our PUD ordinance;
chaC she agrees with that statemenC but it sboulcl bc noted tlhat lV(r. Iaahm's application is not a PUD but is
a straiaht prelirninary plat and those regulations would not be applicable; nor zire there any privatc roads
within the development; regarding traffic impact and joint effort, she e:cplained that she disagrees that the
City today is a regular member of the public; 1_hat they are not; that they are given notice of the
application; and are foday inelucied in the process of cornrnenting as an effective jurisdiction;_and with _
that in mind when the Cit}, ooes to the 1iearino Fxaminer asking for conditions of approval based on the ~
environmental documents, the City is nnt just a member nf the public buC is an efTective agency and
jurisdiction. Mr. Arpin said the. letters mentioned flUove contain legal anllysis regarding that and she
~ feels the City of Spokane Valley does not have any additional legal authority to request conditions of
apprcaval as we entereci into an agreemenC with SpokEine CounC}; thitc it' the developer feels the conclitiori
asked for is umvwimintecl or unlawful, the same effect will be had if the hearing examiner a}~Trees wit,h the
developer whether the Cit:y and the Count.y are unitied or separate; that Mr. Dahrn's apnlication for a
preliminary plat has been deemed complete for a large portion of the area that will be unaffected by thi§,
and there is a portion that has not bceri subrnittecl but is waiting on TOPO, and that preliminary plat
application will also be submitted so there will be no practical affect of an appeal. Itegarding filing of an
appeal, Ms. Arpin said she asl:s that Council examine that as there was no attempt by the CiCy to get
involvcd duririg lhal Cwo-yettr period, even though notice was given. She said that no onc camc to the
Board's hearing to oppose this Fu»endment; despite that almost 1,000 notices were sent out, and before the
City's expencls resourees to itn appeal which would result in no gain, that Council considcr that there has
becn signifiicant movement on the part aC the Cotmty, and shE requests Chat Council not t.3kc t}iat action. Rich_Dahrn, office aclclress 12720 E Nora Spokane Valley: st<itect thaL he feels thaf he is being hcld
hosCage fnr what the City feels is a"wake-up call;" he asked when the idea of an interlocal ttgreemenl was
first conceivcd; hc saicl he is concernecl wit:h waiting while the issues beCwcen tMe City and the County get
resolved; that he feels tliere is a prpblem behveen dle City of Spakane Valley and the County perhaps
stemming frorn comrnunication problems, bu1: Chae these problems are 3ffecting 1iim adversely.
laepuCy M3yor Munson stateci [haC it appears the primary I<<nd owmer will be ablc to eontinue his project
regarGiless of what action Council utkes; anci hc reportecl the follawing outcomes from the r1d Hoc Joint
I'lanning Committee and tliat this will serve as a recommendation tn the Steering Committee of Elected
Offcials, 'adding that all thrEe County Cnmmissioners are part oFthat committee: (I) agreernent that all growth sreas should be,joint planning areas; (2) comrnittee should identify areas with no jurisdictional .
confliet; (3) sheuld iclenCify iu-eas that dn have conflictinb interests; (4) modeling should be used to
J identify transpartation itnpacts within UGA; arxl (5) that intcrlocal agreements should specify standards
and the permitting audiority. L7eputy Mayor Munson mentioned that there were numerous atternpts by
the Steering Co►nriiittce over the last tMree years to bring the County to negotiate a joint planning
a;*reernent, ancJ that itll aCtempts failed; and thiit he wants to continue the negotiations in a positive rnanner
and does not want to penali7e the developer. Councilmember Flanigan expressed his concern wiCh the process; mentioning that there are many odier properties still outside the UGA. Councilmember Denenny .
stated hc fcels the appeal woulci be a friencfly appcal, and reeogmizes Lherc has been a great deal of
movement, but what we curr•ently have is not functioning. Councilmember DeVleming expressed his
conccrn of submitt:ing tin appeal wilh no "teeth" io if; while Cbuncilmernber Taylor expressed that he
feels the merit is not there for this particullr appeal.
Aftcr acclamation vote on the mot:ion topursue 1he uclian lu appeal the clecision orr 1{repart nf tiie County
regartlitrg the Urbmr Cro►vth Areas rnid the change fi°onr Urban Xeserve ta law .Den,rity Rc.siclential in the
Urbay2 Croivth f3oundnrv; roll call vote Nvas taken to contirm the vrote: hY x'avor.- Deputy ATayor Mairrsun,
utrd Coio7cilmernbers 1%la,iigun . ancl Jaenentry. QppUSCt1: Mayor YTlilhile, turd Cn:nrcilrnemhers
DeVletrting, ,S'chimnrels, and 'I aylor. '1'lie mntiofa farled.
` f .
SV6I5n0v^e-s4` ;oOVaHey
11707 E Spraguc Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokaneva(lcy.org
Memorandum
To: City Manager David Mercier and Members of Council
CC: Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager
From: Morgan Koudelka, Administrative Analyst
Date: November 15, 2005
Re: Spokane County Contract Update The previous update on 2005 service agreements was presented to Council on October 11, 2005.
The County continues ta maintain a firm stance afiainst a"me-too" clause that would ensure the
City is chargeti the same rate kor services as other entitiES contracting for the same services. •
F1s an alternative to the "ine-too" clause, the City and the County continue lo work on asslu-ance clause language that would ensure that neither party suhsicli7es lhe other nor will the City
subsiclize any other entit), rccciving similar services.
Since the last update to CaLmcil the County has indicatcd that they will change the cost allocation
method for City service agreements from an OMB-87 mcthodology to a full cost methodology.
The cost a1location plan is u.sed by the County to apply indircet costs, othemzse laiown as
ovcrhead costs, to services the City contracts for. The County ciecideci on the switch because it
currently utilizes the fiill cost allocation plan in contracts vvith the City of Spokane and the County
wanted lo be consislent. This switeh will extend the model agrecmcnt process by several weeks as
we await revised cost exhibits for the individual contracts and a full cost allocation plan. Staff will
review the ncw dociunents and inform the Council as to how the cliinge affects the costs for
County scntices. -
The otlier outstandi.ng iteins listed on the last update to Cnuncil have been addressed by the County
and we are currently awaiting revised service agreements fTpm che Counly.
J.
Spo°Fkkane~
0 ;00*VaUey .
11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 0 Spakane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 549.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org
Informational Memo
Date: November 7, 2005
To: City Council ,
From: Neil Kersten, Public Works Oirector
Steve Worley, Senior Engineer - Capital Projects Cc: Dave Mercier, City Manager
Mike Connelly, City Attorney
Re: Old Milwaukee Railroad R/W Transfer-Environmental Concerns
1"hrough the course of discussions regarding t.he transfer of the old IVlilwaiikec Railroad Right-
nf-Way froin Spokane County to tlie Cit), of Spol:ane Valley conccrns have been expresscd
about the potential environ.mental liability of acr.epting the right-of-way "as-is". Ross Kellcy,
_ County Engineer, has staled that the Count,y lias not conductcd any enviromnental tcsting on lhe
railroad righl-of=way. Staff researeheci th.is issue and provides the following infonnation for
COnSicieraYibn.
Fnvu-onuiental liability, exposing past and present property owners to substautial cxpenses ibr
the cleanup ot' har.ardous uiaterials from real property, was establ.ished under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response; Compensation and Liability Acl of 1980 (CERCI.,A). CERCLEI was
amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA). SAR.t~1
recogiuzcd the fact that a landowner wha had uo connection Nvith the rclease of hazardous
substances at a property would still be liable under CFRCLt-1 and provided the "innocent
landowner defeiise."
"1"o cstablish an innocent landowner defense, SARA states that "the detendant rnust have
undertalcen at the tune of acquisition an all appropriate inquir.y into the previous m«iership anci
uses of the prpperty cousistent wilh gnod commcrcial ar customary praetice in an eff4rt to
minimize liability." SARt1 fiuther states -tliat in canstruing the "all appropriate inquiry
provision, the caui-ts ~vill take the [bl.loti~ruig into account:
• flny specialized knowlcdge or experiencc on the part of thc defendant;
• The relationship of the purchase price to the value of a property if containinatcd;
• CorrunonltiT l:nown or reasonably asccrtainable uiformation about a property;
• The obviousness of ttie presencellikely prescncc oFcontatnination at a property;
• The ability to detECt such containination by appropriate inspection
, T`,\ J
Memo - City Council 11 /7/05Old Milwaukee TZailroad RAV Transfer -Environniental Concerns Pagc 2
Pnidence sug;ests thaf most real estatc transaciions (especially conuiiercial and industrial) be
assesseci for environmental impairuient prior to cnnsununation of a property transfer, to evaluate the risk of the transfer ui light of potential enviroiunental liabilities. Most lending institutions
have established a policy rcquiring Che performance of an all appropriate uiquiry kno~%m as a
Phase T Emriroiuncntal Site Assessmcnt (FSA), to establish the SATtF1 innocent lando-wner .
defense requiremenl.
An appropriatc Phase I FSA, coneiuctecl aecord'uig to industry standards (nSTl~i E 1 527-00),
generally consists of tlie following:
• A visual inspection of the subject property and contiguous propertics by a qualified
individual to identify areas of cpncem and/or potential probleins concer-ning the storage,
handling, and disposal of hazardous substances.
•A review of lustoric public and privatc database listings to determine the historic uses of
a property. This oflen includcs the review of local, state, aiid fedcral govermneiit agency
rceords, reverse telephone clirectories, and fire insurance maps.
• A review of local and regional geological parameters to provide clues regarding eYpected
ambieiit conditians on a property.
• Insightful, strxightforward recoiiunendatiAns and a concluciing stateiiient. This statement
should either specify additional tasks Nvhich need to be performed to detennine if a
property is contalninatcd (thus requiring a Phase II ESA) or state that a property is clear
of environmental liability, thus allowing an indiviclual to c;onclude a transaction under the
protection oFfered uiider Superf'und Amendmeni:s and 1Zcauthc,rization Act of 1986
(SARA).
Aceording to onc local -finn, the potential c.ost to provide a Phase TESA fpr the approsimacely S'/z iniles of Old M:ilwaukee right-of-way within the city is $15,000 -$30;000. An estimated
timefraine of 3-6 months would bc required to complete a Phase 1 EA for tlus right-oi=way.
. J,egal staff strongly recoinmends that a Fhase 1ESA be perforuled. Assunung the eity accepts
the Old Milwaukee Railroad right-of-way from the county, doing this type of site review
provides the cily with certain protec:tioiis uudcr the law, as identified in this memo.
t\ Mofion Consideration for movuig ahcad witli a Phasc I FSA will bc brougllt to Council for
discussiou at a future meeting.
Please note that the design of the Appleway - Tshirley to Hodges project; which we received
fzderal funcls for, is etu-rently undenway and schedulcd for consiruction next year. Because of
the Nuideiung of tlus arterial, additional right-Af-way to the south of Elpplcway may be required.
The area iuunediately south of ttie Appleway right-of-way is the Old Mihvaukce Railroad right-
of way. If the transfer of this railroad right-of'-way to the city is not completed soon we may
nced to request a separale transfer of right-of-way speciiically for the Applcway project. Details of tlus will be worked out as the design of Appleway progresses.