2009, 03-31 Study Session
AGENDA
CITY SPQK4NE VALLEY
CITY C!i)UIVCIL ~~~SHIEET
ST[JDY SESSION
Tuesday, March 31, 2009 +6:00 p.m.
CI'I`Y HALL. COUI~CEL CKA.NEBERS
11707 East Sprague Avenue, I'irs# FNoat~
(Please SiienceYour Ccll Phones During the Meeting)
DISCV ~~~ON .l,.rE~~ SUBHCi f AC1 1 ITY GOAL
i. Lew Leigh,WCIPr Lew's Do's and Don'ts Training Trainingl Discussion/
(60 minutes) Information
2. Tnga Note (10 miwiutes) Signalization Discussiotl{Information
3. C'ar}~ Driskel! (20 minutes) [ntert~~l AgreerLir.Ynt l-iavana Bridge Project Discussior[lniornlatioii
3
4. Mike BasingerlGreg McComiick Comprehensive Piai1 ~mertdt~~ents/ Discussion/Intortnatson
(30 mintrtes) Quarterlv Update
5. (ireg Bingaiiian (F3ing) Ccamputer Tab1et Training TrainingfDiscussion,"
(30 minutes) Inforrnation
errda DiScuSSIonJ"II1fUCTtualic3n
6. ~~avor Munson Advance Ap
7. Cauncilmembers C'orrncil Exterrial Commit~~ ~eports Discussionllnform atian
1
8. IV'Iayor Munsan Col117Cil CIyeck lll iliscussivnlinformatian
9. Niike Jacl. .son Ciiy Discussic~nfIn ~`a~tatic~ri I
~~I~rtia~~ ,~r ~c~~nm~~ .r~ts
_4DJOL.TRN
Note: Unless othen+rise nntrd abovt-} thcrc wikl be no public cumrrients iaf Coaincil Study Sessions. However, Coancil aharays ms-ervcs the
right to request inrorm:atioo from the pub9ic and suff as appr'opriaZe. Duririg nieetings hLld by the Cily vfSpok-ane Vu91cy Counci9¢ thc Cnunci[
reserve--, the right t+a take "uctiran" on any itcni listed or subiscquenl!y t~dded kri Lkte agenc4& 1-he tenn "action" nieuns lo defibe€ate, riiscusss, re-iew,
con:sider, evalus<c, or makc a culltctive positivc or negntrve dccis6ori,
hUTWE Inc~ivicfuals p(anning L$ auend thc rneet+ng »+hn tcquizv spcciat assistance to acrornrr,odWe pbysical, hc-aring, c: otlxs Irnpairments, p!crL~e clotttact uhc CitN°
~lizr1F. al (509) 921-4000 as soctn as pssAlale st) that arringments maN be made.
Pa~~ ~ c!!" V
'4tudu Sc-ss ion Age eldn, Nia.rch 31, 20(r4
WALOm
Insurance Authority
NVC'IA Mcmher 'Fraining Progrums
WCLA Cout►cil I)()': aulcl l)<►n'(s
-I►.~iii~•r: l,rw l.Ci:;li. l,.ti•(-uli\,r 1)irrctc>r
1)ur<<tic,ii: (>ilc lic~tu- -Olicl Dati' ur ENeiutig Sr~,~,i,)n)
:\11cl1r11CC: M.i}'oi-. C'otinril, Cit`' mmalp-. C'M .1I<<
I)cp<<<~~<<<_~~~
I uplc,:
\1`C'1:1 1'uul Oricut:tti"i:
N'Ietilbei• 1Zisk Pi-oll,
l.i.il,ility Elxposurcs Conrcri IiII.;:
1>>ciivislu'-►l :1cls, N1a\'or & CU1111C1I, C'itti' M.in:t(- iiicni
( )tlirr (;ciirt-.Il I.ialfilit}' 1-:Xl)osiirc•s
I ,c `1'rc• t u 1 ~
( >pc•ii 1'ublic Mc<<ill", ViA1,iti0i111
FAecuUvc Scsaioii I.caks
1.:11Ul l-'.Xposu r(.
('ii'~t()iilirc•cl Itisttc,
f
( I
I
'I
II
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
PUBLIC OFFICIALS ORIENTATION
II
March 31, 2009
,
Presented bv:
.
•
WA
I
Insurance Authority
~ •
I
Washington Cities Insuraace Authority (WCIA) is a municipal risk pool. Its 1981
enabling legislation allows it to perform like a private insurance company. 4ne hundred I~
and twenty-six cities and regional entities, performing a city function like 911 dispatcb
agencies, self-insure each other.
Through the use of an actuary, the group annually creates over $26 million in
assessments to cover liability and property risks. WCIA has over $130 million in assets,
of which $60 million is undesignated member reserves to handle contingencies beyond
actuarially predicted events. Through a$4 million administrative budget, the pool
handles 1900 claims annually, and spends $6 million in litigating a pending of 300
lawsuits.
WCIA is distinguished from an insurance company by the aggressiveness of its litigation
defense, winning outright over 71 % of our lawsuits. To actively reduce the number of
claims and lawsuits, it is aggressive in promoting annual risk management, training and
pre-loss consulting requirements to each member. Employees and elected officials are
required to participate in some manner. This council orientation counts as one type of
tra.ining. Failure to participate in our systematic training program, called the COMPACT,
results in substantial peer-induced financial or coverage-related penalties.
A loss analysis by city department identifies public ofticial liability as one of the highest
loss exposures in comparison with other city departments. The Authority also compares
each City's overall risk profile to its peers.
Public official losses largely consist of Mayor/City Manager employment practice
activity: i.e., management of personnel. The Council's losses consist of land use issues
and interference with admuustration activity: i.e., deviating from strategic policy making
functions, appearance of faimess, conflict of interest, and execurive session leaks, etc.
The included vignettes identify actual public official losses, emanating from violations
of clear RCW-created roles and responsibilities, misassumption of powers, and deviation
from city policy.
WCIA periodically visits with councils early each calendar year to identify public official I
conduct which precipitates losses. We hope this is informafive and influences conduct.
_ ~
i~
1
d" l
.y.
AUTHORITY PHILOSOPHIES
_
Missioa Statement:
"WCIA will take a leadership role to provide professional risk management and
stable risk financing programs that respond to members' needs."
Annual Goals:
Assure that WCIA programs are prudently funded and managed to stabilize member assessments.
Maintain prudent growth plan to presen,e ~NVIA's role as a leacjiti(y pool in the state.
Foster sound risk management practicc>.
Respond to member needs.
Program Control:
VVCIA believes the Full Boaxci should be fully aware, and in control, of all pool
operations. Not a broker, third party administrator or insurance company.
In our program, the "insured's" run thc "insurance" company.
Nlembership C'ontrol:
The Authority believes the Full BoArd and a Comniittee System should be in
complete control of the entire program. And that each member, should fully
participate in its risk profile, loss resolution and training.
lndependence from the Insurance Indusirv:
The Authority was punished by the insurance industry in the previous, mid-80's,
"hard market cycle". We have steadfastly built a commanding surplus of funds, a
large self-insurance layer, and aggressive pre and post loss support pmgrams to
insulate us from those market cycles. Remaining liability insurance costs for
catastrophic loss is only 3% of our administrative budget, versus 98% for other
pools. We use "reinsurance" rather than "excess" insurance. The insurance camer
performs only a checkbook function. Identification of desired exposures,
coverage decisions, and claim aild litigation decisions for all coveruge layers
revert to the Full Board.
Financial Independence:
WCIA has the strongest financials of any Washington
Pool. This allows us to assume any exposure or provide any service desired by
the Full Board. We have amassed $85 million in assets, a$30 million surplus,
and a$4 million administrative budget. Member assessments are annually
subsidized by a stable investment income of $5 million.
^jl
yr~
i I
Liti$adon and Claims Management:
WCIA believes in aggressive litigation as opposed to loss settlement tv discourage
unwarranted claims; each member should have direct participation in its claims
and litigation, both in pre- and post-loss stages.
Pre-Defense Review: Pre-loss services include a$600,000 budget-line item,
created to pre-position a member for potential land-use, employment and other
management related litigation. This is a cost-free service, requires no membcr
participating funds, and has no adverse coverage exclusion ramifications.
Litip,ation Defense: The Authority uses trial experienced, aggressive, municipal
defense experts who customize their efforts to our expectations. We annually win
(pay no indemnity damages) in 71 % of all litigation. We include department
heads and employees in depositions, mediations and trials. Councils receive
frequent defense attorney updates.
Training Commitment: CONIPACT:
WCIA believes a fomial, comprehensive training program, coupled w ith
aggressive field risk management services, systematically reduces risk of loss and
supplements city operation. Aggressive risk management is an essential, required
element of pool membership.
A$700,000 budget line item supports a seven-member field risk management
team, and a formal COMPACT training program. The COMPACT, which
receives strong membership support, provides incenrives and penalties to
encourage effective risk management and loss control participation. Both
mandatory and voluntary elements are provided cost free, often at the member's
own location. Consultant and member-specific-training requests, such as
development of personnel manuals are welcometi. The field team, cross-trained in
claims adjusting, systematically reviews member departments from exposures
determined by the Full Board. In addition, they help sustain each member's risk
management program with specific service. To insure responsiveness, each risk
management rep serves as few as 19 members and has no other conflicting role.
Assessment Formula:
Each member's assessment should largely reflect it's own loss experience, its
potential exposures and a percentage of pool services; be developed by a
professional actuary; openly approved by the Full Board; annually receptive to
improved risk management results.
WASHINGTON CITIES INSURANCE AUTHORITI'
Balance Sheets
As of December 31, 2007 and 2006
ASSETS 2007 2006
Cash and Cash Equivalents $18,509,950 $15,406,510
Accrued Interest 405,130 1982797
Investments 92,101,916 87,320,032
Investment in GEM $171652 724,143
Capital Assets 6,020,133 5,944,381
Accumulated Depreciation (721,497) (550,890)
Accounts Receivable 778,651 72,644
Prepaid Expenses 326,859 444,073
TOTAL ASSETS $118,238,794 $109,559,690
LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS
Accounts Payable $416,579 $347,351
Accrued Vacation Compensation 69,794 69,444
Deposits Payable 288,693 263,488
Property & Vehicle Claims Reserve 1,568,009 1,411,825
Reserve for Claims 53,242,291 49,105,102
Reserve for Inereased Confidence Level 14,7851,709 13,7531,898
TOTAL LIABILITIES 70,371,075 64,951,108
Net Assets-Invested in Capital Assets 5,29$,636 5,393,491
Iv'et Assets-tlnrestriciecl 42,569,083 -19,215,091
TOTAL NET ASSETS 47,867,719 44,608158?
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND r'ET ASSETS $118,23 8,794 $109,559,690
,
WASHiNGTOIr' CITIES INSURANCE AUTHORITY
Statements of Revenues, Expenses
And Changes In Fund IV'et Assets
For T6c Years Ended I)ecember 31, 2007 and 2006
2007 2006
Operating Revenues
Member Assessments - Liability $20,727,026 $20,533,549
Member Assessments - Property 61503,791 53,698,585
Member Assessments - Fidelity 72,397 741515
Total nperating Revenues $27,303,214 $26,3067649
Operating Expenses
Loss & Loss Adjustment Expenses $20,419,979 $142494,178
Confidence Level Expense 17031,811 629,341
Insurance - Members 4,826,625 3,818,873
Salaries and Wages 1,385,765 1,235,351
Personnel Benefits 418,492 341,481
Professional Services
Claims Adjusting 524,359 433,312
Pre-Defense Review 489,527 533,836
Consultant 241,839 146,190
Legal 88,579 53,621
Actuarial 25,500 25,000
Audit 15,319 34,012
Financial Services 12,8$0 16,415
Risk Management Audit 8,150 8,150
Rent 120,000 120,000
Transportation 78,395 76,284
Printing 18,699 20,15 5
Communications 17,884 16,656
Supplies 44,268 40,018
Dues and Conferences 26,167 24,757
RetreatBoard Meetings 18,216 24,575
Depreciation 49,574 43,780
Miscellaneous 240410 25,427
Repair and Maintenance 5,708 8,530
Seminars and Training 349,860 398,329
Total Operating Expenses $30,242,006 $22,568,271
WASHINGTON CITIES I~'~SURANCE AUTIIORITY
Statements of Revenues, Expenses
And Changes In Fund Net Assets
For The Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
200( 2006
Operating Income ($2,938,792) $3,738,378
Non-Operating Revenue (Loss)
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investrnents (553,689) 227,398
Realized Gain (Loss) on Investments (16,100) 257,584
Income from Investment in GEM 93,509 24,844
Investment Income 6,649,876 5,355,500
Net Profit (Loss) from Building Operations 24,333 (42,401)
Total Non-Operating Reventie $6,197,9219 $5,822,925
Income Before R-iember Contribtitions $3,259,137 $9,561,303
Net Assets - Janua~, 1 44,608,582 35,047,279
Net A$sets - Dccernber 31 $47,867,719 $44,608,582
- ~
' - i
I • 1 ! ~
r,
Full Board
Governing 6ody
,
,
Corporate Counsel
Committee System
l.oiir Ram,e I'lannint,
Executive Committee
Loc.s l'ontro l .
Administration Opc•rauon
lnvestmcm
Audit
~ J
. a
Execudvc Dircctor
Lobbyist
i~fark~ti►~~,
Deputy Director: Deputy Director: Deputy Director;
HWFinnnce UnderwrIting ClaimslLitigaNon
Finmncit,i Ni~.:mt - 11 cheitc f~~.s Uariha~r
Acruarv ~ Insur~nce I3mkcn Adjus tM Stuf i
Inwesmwait Rmker Prorercy Pro;nm Ou!sidc Scrvices INuntan Rc-,nurccs Member Services ItN1 c.'nn,ultant,~ Risk Services I)efcn,;c Firni,
Manager Manager
%\'C!A Unk L,,itti,
Irnining 11~r1,~•un,~
~ / ~ /
AUTHORITI COIM PACT
1IISTUKY: "I'lle Ca.NLIPr1C'T is a furnial, nlulti-year prugrani consisting of trauiing, risk managemeri
and membership attentiveness elements. The entire membership commits to annual training and risl-
management efforts while the Authority commits to high-quality resources. Si.nce the late i98o's, it
has systematically addressed every municipal exposure. The annual, audited, topics are chosen by the
membership and implemented in four-year increments. An annual $350,000 line item, within a
$700,000 Member Services Department budgefi, is specifically declicated solely for training purposes.
National and local trainers are brought directly to the individual member or nearby regional training
sites. In 2002 over 4,56o employees were trained at 152 sites. Unusual to Washington pools, risk
management training is a mandatory membership obligation, accomplished largely through this
program. The C4MPAGT has received national honors for meritorious achievement, recognized as a
state-of-the-art training program, from the Association of Governmentat Risk Pools (AGRIP).
TRAINING: After analy-zing the ease and enthusiasm with which the original, single training
requirement was met, and the large volume of additional voluntary training repeatedly requested, a
second mandatory training requirement was added. Unlike the first requirement in which every
memUer trains on the same topic, this training is highly flexible, enhanced by a broad list of topics. A
2003 Ad Hoc series, specific to the individual member's sole need, further adds to program flexibility.
This popular session is taught by Authority staff, who actively seeks department employee's
participation. Specific risk management problem-solving,,Mthin the employees own job environment,
are actively pursued. Topics traditionally include police, fire, land use, personnel, public works and
parks, plus custom public officials trouble-shooting areas. Updated issues, precipitated by the
legislaturc or court decisions, complete the Authority's COMPACT commitment.
SUPPORT: The Risk Management Reps are each assigned a specific member, and are instrumental
in ensuring its annual training obli.gation success. They research each year's first mandatory training
topic, to develop a comprehensive checklist of training specifics. Members frequently forward their
checklist responses weeks before the Rep personally makes an annual field visit to maximize field
time. Members receive personalized assistance in successfidly achieving their COMPACT goals.
SUCCESS: In the history of the prograni, only- one city- failed in its COMPAC"I' requirements and was
asked to leave the pool. In 2002, one hundred percent of the membership passed the two training
topics, the annual COMPACT field audit, and the Member .4ttentiveness, NN-hile aggressively training in
many mure ai-eas as ivell.
_ - - - - - =3.~i~! • - - 1 -t - :1' • ~ ~ ) T F_Lt'~•j«
„~~=l - - _ - ~ - - -1• 't~~ ~~Yl'•:
g s ~ k i~
• - . . " : ' - r,~~'~. - - - - _ - . _ =.-r-.. , _ - . - - -
ORGANI"LATIUNAL ATITN"l !N'LtiE:SS RL(lUlltLINILN-I-S
• Attend one Full Board Meeting a year (January, Ma}• or October)
• Pay Assessments on Time-By January 31st
• Appoint a WCIA Delegate and Alternate-update wben changes occur
• Report Claims in a timely manner-per the Claims Manual policies
• WCIA City Attorney must fulfill the City Attorney Attentiveness Requirements
• WCIA Member Delegates must attend assigncd Delegate Attentiveness Trainings
COMPACf 1ST MANDATORY TRAINING
• Members are required to attend on training session to fulfill thc requirement
• Attendance requirernent-Those responsiblc for Land Use decision making
• Training consists of Liability Prevention in tlie following areas:
GTED and PAW courses on Local Planning
Land use Liability Updates on Regulations Complianre
Permit Center Procedures and the Pre-Applicnfion Pr-ocess
Parliamentary Procedure
New Trends nnd ControUersial Issues in Land Use
Land Use Liability Legislative and Quasi-Judicial Decision Mcrkircg
WCIA Council Do's a n d Don'ts
OMPA, Public Hearings and Public Disclosure
Cosponsored Land Use and Elected Official Trainings
COMPACT 2ND MANDATORY TRAINING
• Second Mandatury Training complianee requires each member to complete one trairiing from
thc varicty of training programs to include:
WCIA Orientntions (Elecied offtcials, New Delegates or Member & Gity Attorneys)
WCIA Claims & Incident Training (scheduled years)
WCIA RiskMnnagemeni iol5eries (Fleet, Volunteer, Parks, Council, Fire)
Defensiue Driving Programs-Auto Liability (to include Public Safety EVOC and EVAP)
Personnel and Employment Law Training for Management and Employees
Land Use Liability Prevention (Police, Fire and 9i1 Communications 1rainings)
Co-Sponsored Programs (to be aduertised)
Municipal Certification Programs (Departmeni generated)
COMPACT 3RD MANDATORY TRAIN[NG
• Third Mandatory Training compliance requires each member to complete one training from a
variety of training programs generated, coordinated and implemented on site. Topics include but ~
not limited to:
Risk Managemertt, Safety or ctny WCIA Ot-tentations or Tratnings
Note: Group V Interlocal Agencies and Contract Cities training requirements may be adjusted to
meet individual entity limitations.
.
LOSS SEVERITY
Spokane ValleY vs. Actuarial Group 2 WA
200A
T - 2008 I71.qllniizcc AiitlioritV
$300,000
$2699000
$250,000
$200,000
$150,000
i
$100,000
$57,773
$50,000 1 \
1 $2*90
,
$0 $ 0 $0 $0 $0 ~ $509 $0 ~ a $19100 $0
$Q -1
Q Q ~ o o ~ ~ a a c~n N
U- a a a a ~
a
C~ City Group
Department Codes:
AC Mlmal Control AD Administration CL City Light
DR Developmenl Rev{ew DS disp8tch FRM Fire Medic
FRS Fire Suppressfon LI Library MA Marina
PO Police PR Parlcs and Recreatlon PRM Parks Maintenance
PWE Public Warks Eng(neering PWR Public Works Refuse pWg Sewer
PWSM Pubfic Works Sfreet Maintenance PWW Water SC Senior Center
LOSS FREQUENGY SPokane Valley vs. Actuarial Group 2 WA~ks
2004 - 2008 Insurance Auihoriry
50.0
,
44
45.0
40.0
35.0
30.0
25.0
20.0
15.0 11
10.0
,
/
5.0 2 t
0 0 0 0~ 0 0 0 ' 0
0.0 I
U O -i w N g V) :3 Q 0 w 2 W w cn N 3 N
Q Q u o ~ LL LL 2 a a a a a a ~ n.
a
~ City Group
Department Codes:
AC Mimel Control AD Administratlon CL City Llght
OR Development Review DS Dispatch FRM Flre Medic
FRS Ffre Suppression U L(brary MA Madna
PO Police PR Parks and Recreation PRM Parks Meintenance
pWE Public WorCS Engineering PWR Public Works Refuse PWS Sewer
PVIISM Public Worlcs Street Malntenance PWW Water SC Senlor Center
i
t
WA 4 i .
Insuraiice Authority
CITI- COtrNcrt, Do's ANv noYTS
licluw are worsi-GdS4 bUl CO111I110I1 eXiiI71pIe5 Of POpI C:OU11C1I ac
Leaking Executive Session Information: The Mayor was using the Authority's Pre-
Defense Review program and systematically developing a case for tennina.tion of the
Public Works Director. Councilpersons Gus and Joe, the Director's best friends since
childhood, listened in executive session to the litigation plan outlined by the dc;fense
attorney assigned to the case, and could see that Mr. Director was soon to leave. Thev
,
leaked tlie defense plan to their friend, who gave it to the press, wluch was then printed
on the front page of the local newspaper and alerting the plaintiff attorney ta his case
weaknesses. Neither the defense attorney nor the Authority took this very well, and
issued sanctions upon the City regarding all future persotuiel actions, lunitations of
coverage a.nd defense, applied a$50,000 deductible on a11 future personnel losses and
demanded each council person attend nwnerous personnel training classes. The makeup
of t}IC council changed dramaticall`• in the n.-x: eli:ction.
N1ura1 of tlic Story: KeCp ytiiUt abuu~ executiVc s~;SsiuiI issucs. li yO;i i~a-v~e
conflicts, air them before the issue and/or rescue vourself from the issue.
Pub(ic Meeting Vlulation: Fou1- council persvi7s wanted to non-rene,", City Ivlanager's
contract. They took great pains not to meet as a quorum, using serial meetings of three to
reach a consensus, determine resignation ternis and recommend an interim manager and
employment terms. They advised the remaining council an hour before the couneil
meetinp- rather than in executive or oPen sessicm. With four vc►tes, thev were successful.
Mui•al of the Stor%': 7'lic; r.-I111alillll(y (:UUIIC:Il ct11CI tile pl1bI1C WeI"e Ot1I1'cbN.(I.
A Public Meetins Violation lawsuit was filed. The council members were
required through interrogatories to reveal all meeting written material and dates of
verbal discussions. This included their personal computer hard drives and
rersonal files. They asked the council to defend and indemnify them for lawstiit
expenses, which is being conducted aggressively, and to pay fines and penalties.
The big punishrnent, however, is the puhlic scorn. Good luck on creatint! a
cohesive team and reeiection potentia:. ~
•
WA'~'
Insuran~ce Authority
11.►A Pk_,%: "i,ti030
~,.A ON_)~
CITY C'OI.TNCILL DO'S ANIy DON'TS i-1: .-'Ot-,-~-: 420
Belom, are worst-case but common examples of poor council action:
Leaking Executive Sessiun lnformntion: The Mayor was using the Authority's Pre-
Defense Review program and systematically developing a case for terrriination of the
Public Works Director. Councilpersons Gus and Joe, the Director's best friends since
childhood, listened in executive session to the Iitigation plan outlined by the defense
attorney assigned to the case, and could see that Mr. Director was soon to leave. They
leaked the defense plan to their friend, who gave it to the press, which was then printed
on the front page of the local newspaper and alerting the plaintiff attorney to his case
weaknesses. Neither the defense attomey nor the Authority took this very well, and
issued sanctions upon the City regarding all future personnel actions, limitations of
coverage and defense, applied a$50,000 deductible on all future personnel losses and
demanded each council person attend numerous personnel training classes. The makeup
of the council changed dramatically in the next election.
Moral of the Stom Keep quiet about executive session issues. If you have
conflicts, air them before the issue and/or rescue vourseli from the issue.
Puhlie Meeting Violatioii: Four council persons wanted to iion-renew Cit}, Manage;'s
contract. They took great pains not to meet as a yuorum, using serial meetings of three tu
reach a consensus, determine resignation terms and recommend an interim manager and
employment terms. They advised the remaining council an hour before the council
meeting, rather than in executive or open session. With four votes, they were successful.
Moral of the Story: The remaining council and the public were outr-aged.
A Public Meeting Violation lawsuit was filed. The council members were
required through interrogatories to reveal all meeting writteil material and dates of
verbal discussions. This included their personal computer hard drives and
personal files. They asked the council to defend and indernnify them foi• lawsuit
expenses, which is being conducted aggressively, and to pay fines and penalties.
The big punishment, however, is the publir scom. Gnocl lucl: on creatinL
cohesive. team and reelectioil poteiltial.
InaQpropriate Council Meeting Remarks: Council member Beatrice always wants to
support the public. When a citizen complained about the City's failure to install a
"Children Playing" sign in a neighborhood, Beatrice jumped on the chance to volunteer
the Public Works D'uector to install one. Never mind that the Mt7TCD (you look up
what that is) says that's an illegal sign, and may actually be perceived as supporting
children playing in the street. Nor did Beatrice ask for the traffic volume and accideat
history from which to make an informed decision.
Harold, on the other hand, did use accident history to be sure the Gity didn't modify
the intersection with the worst accident rate over the last five years. He advised, on
the record, that this was his way to church, gave him a free-left turn route, and wasn't
about to change a good thing. Plainriff attorneys used that admission-against-interest
comment to attain a five-zero settlement on behalf of the brain-dead bicyclist-
plaintiff.
Moral of the Story: Now that yau're on TV as well as being tape-
recorded, don't give the plaintiff a gift of infonnation. Study citizen
requests, and ask for staff input, off the record. Have staff, not you
respond. They go through annual liability training and have access to Risk
Management Reps and defense counsel research resowces, as well as
using the City Attorney.
Interference With Staff Funcdons: Council person Clyde stopped a roakie police
officer on a side road, berating him for his dress and performance, said he had been
keeping an eye on the officer, review ed his personnel file and criricized his way af
policing. The officer went to his union, his employment manual (where no council
person was listed in the supervisory chain), to an attorney and a no-contact order, and
then to the press, just for good measure.
Nioral of the Story: Stay out of staffls role. You may be goad at
strategic policy-making, but you have no statutory authority for day to day
aperation of the City. Employees have enha.nced job rights, policies and
procedures. You are most likely not in the employment practices chain of
command. You should use the established chain of command, if you
observe poor practices, by starting at the top with the City Manager or
Mayor. Even starting in the middle of the chain can cause problems. You
have the budget tool as a check and balance. If you and your spouse are
named individually in a lawsuit, congratulations, you've achieved the
maximum, negative effect.
Taking Matters Into Your Own Hands: Harold doesn't think the City's newsletter
does a good enough job so he created his own. He copied (poorly) the City logo and
included executive session discussion to make it interesting, and made up his own policy
on issues. This went way beyond a constituent letter format.
Jim and John thought the police department was ineffective, so they wanted to spy
on a drug sting operation. They disguised themselves by using a spouse's car, but '
breached the police's perimeter security measures, imperiled the officer's safety
and blew the potential bust. They drew a union grievance and generated a recall
action. They asked WCIA and the City to defend them and pay legal fees. Both I
declined, citing the State Auditor's opinion.
Moral of the Story: Limit your opinions to official channels. If you leak
executive session information, we'll be mad at you. Use your budget
powers to effect change. WCIA could have helped financially with a
LEMAP study, and WASPC state accreditation subsidies tv systematically
improve department operation.
Mid-Process Land Use Permit Chan e: The Council was ecstatic over a big-box
store's sitting in its City, until some council persons realized the artist's rendering
included the name W-A-L on the building's side. Efforts to frustrate the permit included
inclusion of corporate culture elements and refusal to allow multiple egress points with
city land. Council quotes of "we'll never let..." appeared in the newspapers and in
council sessions, community organization presentations.
Moral of the Story: As reprebensible as some corporate culture is, they're not
part of a building permit process. More objective issues, such as traffic volume
and egress safety issues are more viable hurdles. Going outside the process to
show bias, although politically vibrant, creates easy plaintiff due-process
advantages in court.
Shopping for 'Loning Code Changes: The Chamber caught the Gouncil's ear and
wanted to fight back against big chain stores, which were putting local mom and pop
stores out of business. They shopped for a carefully crafted legal opinion that offered
partial help in changing to a requirement that all businesses within city limits be locally
owned. Subway would be the first casualty.
Ntoral of the Story: This is a live issue. The Pool and the City are at odds.
This passed, but has not acted against any established or new chain business
to date. Should this occur, the City will be brought to the Executive Committee
for sanctions.
Next Time We Get Together: I'll tell you about a council member who was maced by
the police chief for resisting his physical removal from the council room, while being
filed on the Hard Copy TV show. Nobody (yet) has topped that one!
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: March 31, 2009 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information 0 admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Traffic signal operation
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None
BACKGROUND: Council has requested information on signal operation and coordination.
A presentation on traffic signal operations to follow-up on the March 3`' informational memo.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: None
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None
STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten, Public Works Director; Inga Note, Senior Traffic Engineer
ATTACHMENTS: Presentation
°T''`~~ane
Valky
S'ignal Traff"lc Coordination
Inga Note, Senior Traffic Engineer
Neil Kersten, Public Works Director
~
,
H.~ ~ ' ' i .1 ~ ` -
S . _J Ys_ • i
{
l ~
CITY~~ane
Valley
Parts of the Cab"lnet
• Cabinet
- Houses contro er, detectors, wiring,
oad switches, circuit pane s, etc. -
-
• Contro ler
- The computerthat determines the signa disp ays.
J~~x A
l V'~ vl
• Conf'ict Monitor
- n case of contro er ma function, ensures conflicting phases do not
receive a green at the same time.
~
aTy tir~~►f~ii~
M 1
ey
Detectmion
• Loops ~ r ~ X
- Current runs through wire coi under
. . M~- .
aspha t and generates a e ectrica fie d.
n, .
_
Presenceofmeta inthecenterofthe
.~.-:f~•~:'~,~~,` ~ _ ~
oop (a vehice) disrupts the fie d. t~?.
't ; `~'r. •J, y . War,•
- Change in e ectrica fe d is detected by the contro er.
• Cameras
- Software ooks at changes in pixe s to
,
, ~
determine vehic e s presence.
an, ~~ane
~
Valley . . .
Definitions
• PHASE - the green, ye ow, and red interva assigned
to a traffic movement.
• CYC.E ENG'H - the time required to serve a
phases of the signa.
• FREE MODE - cYce ength varies by traffic demand.
• COORD NA' ON -to synchronize multipe
intersections to enhance the operation of one or more
directiona movements in a system.
. .
oI;Ze
S OValley
Cycle Lengths
z
..~1
• 60 seconds for pHASE . 4 ~-4
DiAORAN t+2
intersections with 2 ~
phases niMa ,
aMa. 04 02 t
eannidi ~ i
• 90-150 seconds for nIAGRAM
+
intersections with more phases, depending on 25
~
oMAlE 4- A 4
volumes and nurnber
p• ~
3 ~ .rx r~7
61AORAM
of lanes.
16
Ria01
I
• To ach ieve 03 ~ o, ~ mz ~
e►nnin
r nation a
C00 di `
wmeu~
;
intersections must run - mm. V; 06
O7
I
08 +
the same cycle ength. -
ew♦
r ~
I~ Of
e ~
al1~ lbll
~ C ei e
ay CouP~~ 120
_ u0lApp,e' 1
ng f°r sp~~
pa+~y pa~'8r ~00'se
~yc~e
96"~5a~
s c
85 1 mQd _ `
. ,
e 60 •
Y f
-
- 4O
~
~ 1500
Fr
ode
? 7
100 ~ . ,
' ~y N N
N ~
500
~
statt Hour
o r►
~
~ ~
~
Valley
Cycle Length T"ime of Day
Daily Patterns for East Sprague Timing
3000 130 se , cy~cle' i - 140
I I 120
2500 - - ~ - - -
,
! ' ' - 100
2000 ~ . ~ ; - - - - ,
red
~
80
~ode
? 1500
> 60
; ~ .
1000
40
,
're
500 f ode 20
,
.
O O
a~. d a a o~. a a a a a a a
Q
g g g g g g g g g g g g 8 8 g g g g g g g g g S
(V ~ cI f7 ~ tf1 cD t~ GO N b ~ N ~ cV e6 iA t~ t~ e0 bi 6 T--
r ~ r- r ~ r
Start Hour
Crfl tJlf"Kane
Valley Sprague Ave
. .
Time-Space Diagram
` r
~ " / ~ / ~ ~t~, , ~11 >
1 ' !
1 `
Ka~t'
Spregge
~~~}1 .
a N Ewnjmon RA r 0"~ c~,y~,- • , _~~~,tY1\~,,;'i,`
Sp►Oqtlt k,
~AdMts
gpfagvo
~ ~J~rt KM11VM1~ >+tr~~P~~~r l~!Vn /
PIQqtl~i ~ ' ~ F + 0~~
~
' A6~~l~'~+
~0, ,
9pnlgve
~ Su11F/lin m
r,1,~ r
T I ~~\~i~~~~
aTY Orl~~ne
Valley
S'ignal Operations wolth
a 130 sec Cycle Length
With high volumes oa Adams or a pedestrian crossing Sprague
~ z Sprague is guaranteed at least 75 04
secon s o e
5 cast-west movement
r
Low volumes on Adams
04
t 2 Provldes 100 sec of
~an.e
~
Valley
?
Quest'ions.
agram
Kiley
' s a~
~e
~
ri
~
~
30
f' t1~Q'
1►
~ ~ ~`~t►~ dt~~~n~'~
2 1
~
, ,
~
~ ~
,
.J r
,'y •
4_-
i+r4 1
Z
~
~
~ • ,.a ~
Z
,
quo
~
a vutvdSws
t
~
r ~
ra
. ra
. elospakc
15treet
yvc~
~
12~
t ~
~
14 ~ ~4
~
~ f3 ti
1~ •
I
SCTT10F1~~~
Valky Phasaing
Lead"ing vs. Laggimng Lefts
Typical operation
I Leadl ~ 02 #3 Leadin N
6 r6 ~ 7 ~
Opcration lagging NB and EB left turn
j„Z Lagging iefc M 03 Lg69inp lett
~0s ♦ 07 ~e
13e
. _ ,
(7f 1' l
Akomoe
~
Valley TimemSpace Diag.ram
Leading vs. Lagging Lefts
~
~
,
„
in
i "
fn~~fi,
/
I
! 1
!
~i
ti1 i11~
A/4/xII.
• Sprague/Pines and • Sprague/Pines and
Sprague/McDona d with Sprague/McDonald with
eading efts lagging EB left
~``~~ane
~
Valley
.
pecial Cases
Trent/Argonne Tw"ice Per Cycle Left
TrentlArgonne opcration from 3:30 to 6:00 pm
t 02 `03 04
5 06 r7 r8 r~
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: March 31, 2009 City Manager Sign-off: _
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information 0 admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Interlocal Agreement/Ordinance of Eminent Domain
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCWA 35A.21.160, RCW 35.22.280(7), RCW 35.22.280(6),
RCW Chapter 8.12
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: NA
BACKGROUND: The City of Spokane is proceeding with the Havana Street Bridge Project.
The City of Spokane Valley borders but does not include Havana Street. Because of the design
requirements, the project requires additional private property adjacent to Havana and located
within the City of Spokane Valley. Consequently the City of Spokane has asked that we allow
the City of Spokane to act as our agents in proceeding with a condemnation action using our
Eminent Domain powers. All costs will be paid by the City of Spokane.
Attached is the Intedocal Agreement setting forth the terms of this agreement and the
Ordinance which wi11 be considered by Council on the 7th of April. Notice of this action has been
provided to the property owners and they are currently in discussions with the City of Spokane.
Notice has also been provided to the County who owns a portion of Havana and are involved in
the project as well.
OPTIONS: NA
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: NA
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: No fiscal impact
STAFF CONTACT: Michael F. Connelly
ATTACNMENTS:
1. Interlocal Agreement
2. Ordinance
Return to: City of Spokane
Attrt: Clerk
808 W Spokane Falls Blvd
Spokane, WA 99201
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SPOKANE AND THE CITY OF
SPOKANE VALLEY REGARDING ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY BY EMINENT
DOMAIN FOR THE HAVANA STREET BRIDGE PROJECT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the City of Spokane,
a Washington municipal corporation, and the City of Spokane Valley, a Washington
municipal corporation, jointly hereinafter refeRed to as the "parties."
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane is a first class charter city duly organized and
existing under and by virtue of the constitution and laws of the State of Washington, and
the Charter of the City; and
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley is a code city du{y organized and existing
under and by virtue of the constitution and laws of the State of Washington; and
WHEREAS, the laws of the State of Washington (RCW 35.22.280(7)) provide that
the City of Spokane may establish, open, alter, widen, extend, and otherwise improve
streets, alleys, avenues, sidewalks, and other public property in order to promote the best
interest of the City; and
WHEREAS, the laws of the State of Washington (RCW 35A.21.160) provide that
the City of Spokane Valley possesses all of the powers which any city of any class may
have; and
WHEREAS, the Constitution of the State of Washington, Article I Section 16 and
the laws of the State of Washington allow cities to purchase or appropriate private property
for public use upon making just compensation to the owners pursuant to Chapter 8.12
RCW; and
Page 1 of 14
WHEREAS, RCW 8.12.030 authorizes cities to condemn land and property for
streets and bridges within the limits of such cities; and
WHEREAS, the parties have determined that it is in the best interests of both cities
to construct the Havana Street Bridge Project, as set forth in the City of Spokane Public
Works File Number 2004062 (hereinafter the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, the property described in this Agreement is necessary to complete the
Project; and
WHEREAS, said property which is necessary to complete the Project is located
within the corporate limits of the City of Spokane Valley; and
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley has agreed to assist the City of Spokane in
acquiring such property according to the terms of this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, Havana Street forms the corporate boundary between the Cfty of
Spokane and the City of Spokane Valley, but in places the eastem haff of Havana Street
remains unincorporated and under the care and responsibility of Spokane County; and
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane is engaged in discussions with Spokane County
that will result in the revision of the City of Spokane's corporate boundary to coincide with
the eastem edge of Havana Street so as to fully include Havana Street within the
corporate limits of the City of Spokane at all places where Havana Street lies on the City of
Spokane's eastem corporate limits; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 39.34 RCW authorizes parties to enter into agreements for
joint or cooperative action to exercise any power or powers, privileges, or authority
exercised or capable of exercise by either of the parties; and
WNEREAS, pursuant to RCW 8.25.290, notice has been mailed to each and every
property owner of records, as indicated on the tax rolls of Spokane County according to
such addresses shown on such rolls, at least frfteen (15) days prior to the City Council
taking final action on this Agreement and related ordinance, including publication of notice
of the ordinance in the Spokesman Review and Spokane Valley News Herald for two (2)
consecutive weeks before final action by the City Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the facts and recitals set forth
hereinabove, which are adopted herein and made a part of this Agreement and which the
parties mutually agree constitute good and adequate consideration for the obligations of
the parties set forth herein, the parties hereby agree as follows:
Page 2 of 14
SECTION NO. 1: PURPOSE
The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth certain agreements between the City of
Spokane and the City of Spokane Valley relating to acquisition of privately owned land and
t?ronPfiv hv eminPnt dnmain as i~ f,)r r-nr-ctr~ lr`tlr)fl rlf fihr, Pr~~rrf
it jjcawc: z~- dy;;.;C ii icil 11 tc: jj[ UVlSiOf ij ui 'ti it5 f-~~1 CCl i iCf ll S( l"citl dpply IO I11e laflV af i
roperty described in the ordinance attached hereto as Exhibit "A" ("Eminent Domain
L_iY1liYGi'4 UViYIHtlV
Upon finai action or legislative approval of the Eminent Domain Ordinance by the City of
Spokane Valiey, the Office of City Attomey for the City of Spokane may commence an
action or actions in the Superior Court of Spokane County, State of Washington, in the
name of the City of Spokane Valley, to acquire and take by eminent domain the lands and
property interests described in the Eminent Domain Ordinance (the "Property"), the parties
having found that the Property described therein is necessary for the Project. The title to
the Property shall vest in the City of Spokane Valley for public street purposes and all uses
incidental thereto, subject to such rights as the City ot Spokane determines are necessary,
in its sole discretion, for constnucting the Project, maintaining the subsequently improved
public right-of-way, and enforaement of traffiarelated laws and regulations.
SECTION NO. 4: RELOCATION ASSiSTANCE
Relocation assistance shall be made available to eligible owners and tenants of the
Property. Responsibility for any such costs shall be borne by the City of Spokane as set
forth in Section No. 5 below.
SECTION NO. 5: RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACQUISITION COSTS
In recognition that the City of Spokane has assumed responsibility for construction of
the Project and that acquisition of the Property is necessary for the Project, as between
the parties, the City of Spokane shall be responsible and hereby agrees to pay all
Acquisition Costs relating to the Property, as the term Acquisition Costs is defrned in
this section. For purposes of this Agreement, Acquisition Costs means any and all costs
pertaining to efforts to acquire and acquisition of the Property. Without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, such costs may include: (a) amounts payable as part of any
voluntary agreement and/or settlement relating to acquisition of the Propetty; (b) amounts
awarded by a courtfjury to the owner(s) of the Property as just compensation following
trial, including any attorneys fees and costs awarded by the court to the owner(s) and/or
their attomeys; (c) amounts paid to the owner(s) of the Property and/or their attomeys as
Page3of14
attomeys fees and costs upon discontinuance and/or abandonment of efforts to acquire
the Property by eminent domain; (d) any relocation assistance paid to such owner(s) or
seller(s), whether or not required under Chapter 8.26 RCW; and (e) costs of necessary
appraisals and title insurance to acquire the Property.
SECTION NO. 6: INDEMNITY ~
The City of Spokane shall defend, indemnify and hold the City of Spokane Valley, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries,
damages, losses or suits including attomey fees, arising out of or in connection with the
performance of this agreement, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole
negligence of the City of Spokane Valley.
Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this agreement is subject to
RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to
persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence
of the City of Spokane and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, and the City
of Spokane Valley, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, the City of
Spokane's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the City of Spokane's
negligence, or that of its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers.
SECTION NO. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
The parties acknowledge that they, with the support of counsel, appraisers, and other
consultants, are engaging in a cooperative venture for their joint benefit. In furtherance
of this cooperative venture and the parties' common interests in obtaining the Property,
the parties and their respective legal counsel agree to share information relating to such
efforts. Such exchanges and disclosures will be for the exclusive purpose of facilitating
the parties' common interests in the acquisition of the Property and will not diminish in
any way the confidentiality of the materials exchanged, nor will this exchange constitute
a waiver of any of the parties' attorney-client or work product privileges. To the extent
allowed by law, and consistent with the parties' respective obligations under the Public
Records Act, Chapter 42.56 RCW, the parties each agree to preserve and protect the
confidentiality of all financial, valuation, and other proprietary information that they may
obtain, and to create and preserve any applicable attorney/client and litigation work
product privileges, and public record disclosure exemptions, in compliance with
applicable State law.
SECTION NO. 8: CONTROL OF PROJECT
Although the parties may consult and assist the City of Spokane with the acquisition of
the Property and the Project, the City of Spokane shall retain final decision making
authority and discretion regarding such acquisition and the completion of the Project.
The City of Spokane shall pay the costs and expenses to be incurred in connection with
the construction of the Project.
Page 4 of 14
SECTION NO. 9: ADMINISTRATION
The City of Spokane hereby designates its City Attorney as its representative for the
purpose of implementing this Agreement. The City of Spokane Valley hereby designates
its City Attorney as its representative for the purpose of implementing this Agreement.
SECTION NO. 10: TERMINATION
This Agreement may be terminated at any time by mutual written consent of the City of
Spokane and the City of Spokane Valley.
SECTION N0.11: DEFAULT
It shall be an "Event of Default° under this Agreement if either of the parties to perform,
observe, or comply with the covenants, agreements, or conditions on its part contained in
this Agreement, where that failure continues for a period of fifteen (15) days after written
notice from the non-defaufting party.
SECTION NO. 12: REMEDIES
In the event of any Event of Default, the non-defaulting party may at any time, without
waiving or limiting any other right or remedy, pursue any remedy allowed by law including,
by way of example and without limitation, specific performance, declaratory judgment, and
other equitable remedies, and recovery of attomey's fees and other costs for such
enforcement action.
SECTION N0.13: NOTICE
All notices shall be in writing and served on any of the PARTIES either personally or by
certified mail, retum receipt requested, to the persons below designated as contact
persons. Notices sent by certffied mail shall be deemed served when deposited in the
United State mail, postage prepaid.
CITY OF SPOKANE: City Attorney
808 West Spokane Falls Blvd
Spokane, Washington 99201
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY: City Attorney
11747 E Sprague, Room 103
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
SECTION NO. 14: AGREEMENT TO BE FILED
The City of Spokane shall file this Agreement with its City Clerk and with the County
Auditor. The City of Spokane Valley shall file this Agreement with its City Clerk.
Page 5 of 14
SECTION NO. 15: COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
The parties shali observe all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances and
regulations in conjunction with meeting their respective obligations under the terms of
this Agreement.
SECTION NO. 16: VENUE STIPULATION
The laws of the State of Washington shall be applicable to the construction and
enforcement of this Agreement. Any action at law, suit in equity or judicial proceeding
regarding this Agreement shall be instituted only in courts of competent jurisdiction
within Spokane County, Washington.
SECTION NO. 17: MODIFICATION
No modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be valid until the same is
reduced to writing and executed with the same formalities as this present Agreement.
SECTION NO. 18: WAIVER
No officer, employee, agent or otherwise of any party has the power, right or authority to
waive any of the conditions or provisions of this Agreement. No waiver of any breach of
this Agreement shall be held to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach. All
remedies afforded in this Agreement or at law shall be taken and construed as cumulative,
that is, in addition to every other remedy provided herein or by law.
SECTION NO. 19: ALL WRITINGS CONTAINED HEREIN
This Agreement contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. No other
understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement shall be
deemed to exist or to bind the parties. The Parnes have read and understand all of this
Agreement, and now state that no representation, promise or agreement not expressed in
this Agreement has been made to induce any of them to execute it.
SECTION NO. 20: HEADINGS
The section headings in this Agreement have been inserted solely for the purpose of
convenience and ready reference. In no way do they purport to, and shall not be deemed
to, define, limit or extend the scope or intent of the sections to which they pertain.
SECTION NO. 21: SEVERABILITY
In the event any portion of this Agreement should become invalid, or otherwise
unenforceable, the rest of this Agreement shall remain in full foroe and effect.
Page 6 of 14
SECTION NO. 22: BINDING EFFECT
Both parties warrant that they have the full power and aufhority to execute and deliver this
Agreement and to perform their respective obligations under this Agreement. This
Agreement constitutes a valid and legally binding obligation of hoth partips and is
r, rrt-1 }-,n;_. I'1 Ifc^_ -,P`l` _ i. . - . . . . _ . . . 5 . i_.. v'...r i -n
Time is of the essence of this Agreement.
r` TR f 1 ki R. i r'1 7 A- n r' ! A!'? r~; Ln r- ~i ri -i r r-. r- t r. +r- n
Sce Seciion No 1 above.
B. DURATiON.
See Section No. 10 above.
C. ORGANIZATION OF SEPARATE ENTITY AND ITS POWERS.
See Section No. 9 above. No separate legal entity is necessary in conjunction with
this Agreement.
D. RESPONSiBILITIES OF THE PARTIES.
See provisions above.
E. AGREEMENT TO BE FILED.
See Section No. 14 above.
F. FINANCING.
See Section No. 5 above.
G. TERMINATt4N.
See Section No. 10 above.
H. PROPERTY UPON TERMINATION.
See Section No. 3.
Page 7 of 14
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES have caused this Agreement to be
executed on date and year opposite their respective signatures.
DATED: CITY OF SPOKANE
By:
Its:
Attest: Approved as to form:
City Clerk Assistant City Attorney
DATED: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
By:
Its:
Attest: Approved as to form:
City Clerk City Attomey
Page 8 of 14
Exhibit A
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ACQUISITION BY EMINENT DOMAIN OF CERTAIN
LANDS NECESSARY TO BE ACQUIRED FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES IN CONNECTION WITH THE
HAVANA STREET BRIDGE PROJECT, LOCATED IN THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, COUNTY OF
SPOKANE, STATE OF WASHINGTON
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley, Washington (the "City") is a code city dufy organized and
existing under and by virtue of the constittution and laws of the State of Washington
WHEREAS, the laws of the State of Washington {RCW 35A.21 160} provide that the City possesses
all of the powers which any city of any class may have; and
WHEREAS, the laws of the State of Washington, RCW 35.22.280(7) provide that the City may
establish, open, alter, widen, extend, and otherwise improve streets, alley, avenues, sidewalks, and other
public property in order to promote the best interest of the City.
WHEREAS, the Constitution of the State of Washington, Article I Section 16 and the laws of the
State of Washington RCW 35.22.280(6) allow the City to purchase or appropriate private property for public
use upon making just compensation to the owners pursuant to RCW Chapter 8.12.
WHEREAS, the City has determined that it is in the City's best interest to cooperate with and
facilitate the City of Spokane's completion of the Havana Street Overpass Project, as set forth in City of
Spokane Public Works file number 2004062.
WHEREAS, the property identified in Exhibit "A" is necessary to complete the Project.
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane has represented that it has negotiated in good faith for the
acquisition of the property identified in Exhibit A, but the parties are unable to agree upon the purchase price.
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 8.25.290, notice has been mailed to each and every property owner of
records, as indicated on the tax rolls of Spokane County according to such addresses shown on such rolls, at
least fifteen (15) days prior to the City Council taking final action on this ordinance, including publication of
notice of this ordinance in the Spokesman Review the Spokane Valley News Herald for two (2) consecutive
weeks before fina( acfion by the City Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, The City of Spokane Valley does ordain:
Section 1. Public use and necessity requires the City of Spokane Valley to acquire the land and
property, and interests therein, as described in Exhibits "A" and "B", together with such additional temporary
construction easements as are deemed necessary the City of Spokane, for public purposes in order to
oomplete the Havana Street Bridge Project, including utilities and related improvements, all as set forth in City
of Spokane Public Works file number 2004062.
Section 2. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Interlocal Agreement, a copy af which is
attached hereto as Exhibit "C", the City Attomey and duly appointed Special Counsel are hereby authorized
and directed to commence an action or actions in the Superior Court of Spokane County, State of
Washington, in the name of the City of Spokane Valley, to acquire and take by eminent dornain the lands and
property interests necessary to be acquired for the purposes set forth herein, the lands and property interests
to be so taken situate in the City of Spokane Valley, County of Spokane, all in the State of Washington, and
Page 9 of 14
more specifically described in Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof,
together with such amendments thereto and such additional temporary construction easements as are
deemed necessary by City stafF to complete the project.
Section 3. The Office of the City Attomey for the City of Spokane is hereby for the purposes set
forth herein appointed as special counsel to the City of Spokane Valley. Said firm shall provide all legal
services in conjunction with the Office of the City Attomey for the purpose of representing the joint interests of
the City of Spokane Valley and the City of Spokane as expressed in this ordinance.
Section 4. That compensation for the land and property interests described in Exhibit "A" and "B"
and a11 associated costs, expenses, damages and attomey fees shall be solely payable by the City of
Spokane from fund account number 3200-94991-95200-56102, and funds which are allocated toward the
Havana Street Bridge Project by the City of Spokane Department of Construction Services, pursuant to file
number 2004062.
PASSED by the City of Spokane Valley City Council this day of , 2009.
MAYOR
Attest:
City Clerk
Page 10 of 14
Exhibit 'A"
Lecia1 Descri fion ~f Take
}
H.ite Acquisition Pot-cian of Assessor's Parcel No. 35142.9041
A1'1 thafi portion oftlte ncarthvaest quarter of Section 14, Township t~., I~an~e 4-j, ~~,W.M., l}9n-
wichin th+e hereinafter +described Paa-cel "A" described ass fo11ow;
Bcgin.aing at the intersection of the north rl',ght of wa;y line of Br~adwray Avenue and the cast rmgltt
of way of 1-favana StTeet; said point of beginning bearrs N.88°12'37s'E-, 10.00 feet fiorn the west
seetion line o#` said 5ection 14 a.ttd N.01159'41"W., 30.00 feet from the West corner of said
5ection 14; thence N.0 I159'41" W., alang the cast right of way Iine of Havana Street, 300.00 feet;
thence N.58°12'37"E., 50.00 feet; thence S.0I°59'41bTE., 70.00 feet; thence S.43°06'28"W., 63.53
feet, thence S.0 1 159'4 1 "E_, par"ajlel to md 5.00 #'eet east of the east right of ;vay line of Havana
Sti`ee,t, 175.00 feet; thence S.46°5332"E., 14.17 feet, to the north right of vvay line of Br~adway
Arrenue, thencc S.88112'-37"W-, alon- said north riolit of ~{~ay 31ne, 15.00. feet to a}ie point of
beginnsnt,.
N'arcel
T'hat portian of the ~outhwest quarier of ilte Nardiwest quarter of Section 14.
Tow-nship 25 North, Rauge 43 East. WAT., irt iiie City of Spok-anc Val 1cN , Spok~~~e COUMN',
Washi.ngtnn, c1escribed as foll~.~%vs:
BEGMNING at the iiiteiFsection of the North 1ine vt Bro~dwav Avc.nue aiid tiie ha.st lane of
Havana Street,
Thence North 300 feet alozig thc East line vfHavana Street;
Thence East 300 fieet;
Ther►ce Scauth 300 feet co tbe Ncrnh iine of I3road►way Avenuc,
1"he«ee WeSi 300 feet io rhe F'OTN`i' OF ~EGINN [NG:
(Coratains 5,712 sq.. ft.)
Hite Acquisiclcan Pot-tian of ~ssessor's Parccel No. 35142,9078-
,A,11 that partion of the nctirrthwest quarter of Section 14, Township 25 N., Range 43. EMA1., lying
«}ithin the hereinafter described Farcei "X' described as foHow.
BeginnEng on the east right of way line of Havana Str~,~:t, said point of be,ginning bears
N_88012'37"E., 30.00 feet; thence N.{}1'59'41"W., 330.00 feet, fram th~ Wesc corner of said
Section 14; thencc N.0 1159'41"W., alortg said east right of way 1ine, 60.04 feet to th:e northwest
eomer of said parcel; thence N.$811237"E., a1ong the nurth Iitte of said parcel 50,00 feet; thence
S.01059i417E ,6{1.00 feet, ta the stauth line of sa4d RarceT; thence 5.88912'37"W,, along sa.id sottth
line, 50.00 feet, to the point of beginnint,.
i'arcei ."A":
That portaon of the Southwest quarter of the Nordiwest quat'ter of Section 14, "I ow°nship 25 Northt
Range East, W.M., in the City of Spokar~e Valley, Spvkatte Gounty„ Washington, describ-e-d as
fo1laws:
Page 11 of 14
BEGMNiNG at the iriiersectiori of the Norils line of Broadway Avenue and t~ic East linc of
Havana 5treet„
T'hence NvrEh 300 feet a.long said East 1ine to the TRUE POINT OT BEG]NN!NG;
Thence corttinuing North 60 feet alcang saFd East line;
Thence East 300 feet;
Theflce SQuth 60 ieet;
Thence West 300 feet to #he TRUE POINT OF BEC;INNING.
(C:ontains 33,000 sq, ft.)
Page 12 arf 14
Exhibit "B"
Leqal Description of Temporary Construction Easement
Hite TempgrarYConstruction Easemeat (Pariion of Assessor's Parcel No. 35142 904 1,
A 10 foot wide TemnnrZn,- C'nn,~fircti~n F:Iserr.-rit 1v"sn- c~I~z► of -ml 70i-lc,-nt t~-, *i- -
described par~-
All that portiu,i i: !i~ a1t'.:.t_.. .~;,.:lti: 1'`~.L:.'ii i 1\. il:~lil~' i'Lll~ 2. j..
within the hereinafter described Parcel "A" described as follow:
:•ginning at the intersection of the notth right of way line of Broadway Avenue and the east right
way of Havana Streei; said point of beginning bears N.88° 12'37"E., 30.00 feet from the west
tion line of said Section 14 and N.O 1°59'41 "W., 30.00 feet from the West carner of said
ction 14; thence N.01 °59'41 " W., along the east right of way line of Havana Street, 300.00 feet;
~:nce N.88° 12'37"E., 50.00 feet; thence S.0 I°59'41 "E., 70.00 feet; thence S.43006'28"W., 63.53
ct; thence S.0 1 °59'4 I"E., paral(eI to and 5.00 feet east of the east right of way line of Havana
~-,reet, 175.00 feet; thence S.46°5332"E., 14.17 feet, to the north right of way line vf Broadway
,%venue, thence S.88°12'37"W., along said north right of way line, 15.00 feet to the point of
hc~~ inning.
I'arce) "q,,:
I hat portion of the Sauth%vest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 14.
[ ownship 25 NorCh, Range 43 East, W.111., in the CitNI of Spokane Val lcN. Spokanr Cotint~.
~~~asi~iri ,ton, described as fallo%~~5: ~
Ei}:C;itiNING at the intersection of the Nortli line uf Broad%v,vv A-Venue arici thc Ea`t linc ot'
f i avana Street;
l-hcnce North 300 feet along the East line of Havana Streez;
"rhence Easi 304 feet;
"1-hence South 300 feet to ihe North line of Broadway Avenue,
Thcricc Wts; ';t►U t'c,c co che POI'VTOF I3EGiNNTNCi;
(Cuntains sq. lt. )
f lite Temporary Coristructioii LaSe117e1iL(ili)ftloil Ot ASSCSSOI''s Parcel Nu. 35I42,9075 )
A 10 foot wide Temporary Construction F,asement east of and adjacent to ihe followin, deticrihed
:'11l tt?at portion of tlie nc~rtt«west qtiarter ot'Scctiort 14, 7c,wnship h:.. [Zan<,c =t .3. FAVAt., l"'in`=
ftl7tIl Iflt' herein;►tter d~:scri~~ed }'arcrl ";l" dc:t:rii)tJ ,izS
E3--`,innino un thc ca5t riz-ht ot wa,. line ul' Hatana Sir«t, said puint u( begitlning b.ar."
N.88012'37"E., 30.00 feet; thence N.01°59'41"W., 330.00 feet, from the West 1/4 corner of said
Section 14; thence N.01°59'41"W., along said east right of way line, 60.00 feet to the northwest
corner of said parcel; thence N.88°12'37"E., along the north line of said parcel 50.00 feet; ihence
S.0 I°59'41"E., 60.00 feet, to the south line of said parcel; thence S.88°12'37"W„ alang said south
line, 50.00 feet. to the point of beginning
Page 13 of 14
And the north 10 feet of the west 175.22 feet, cxcept the west 50 feet of the hereinafter descri~.ied
parcet "A".
Parcel "A":
That portion of the Southwest quarter of the North%vest quarter of Section 14, Township 25 North,
Range 43 East, W.M., in the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, describcd as
follows:
BEG1NNING at the intersection of the North line of Broadway Avenue and the East line of
Havana Street;
Thence North 300 feet along said East line to the TRUE PO[NT OF BEGINNING;
Thence continuing North 60 feet along said East line;
Thence East 300 feet;
Thence South 60 feet;
Thence West 300 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNII`'G.
(Contains 1,723 sq. ft.)
Page 14 of 14
DRA IT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 09-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON,
PROVIDING FOR THE ACQUISITION BY EMINENT DOMAIN OF CERTAIN LANDS NECESSARY TO BE
ACQUIRED FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES IN CONNECTION WITH THE HAVANA STREET BRIDGE
PROJECT, LOCATED IN THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, COUNTY OF SPOKANE, STATE OF
WASHINGTON.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley, Washington (the "City") is a code city duly organized and
existing under and by virtue of the constitution and laws of the State of Washington.
WHEREAS, the laws of the State of Washington (RCW 35A.21.160) provide that the City possesses
all of the powers which any city of any class may have; and
WHEREAS, the laws of the State of Washington, RCW 35.22.280(7) provide that the City may
establish, open, alter, widen, extend, and otherwise improve streets, alleys, avenues, sidewalks, and other
public property in order to promote the best interest of the City.
WHEREAS, the Constitution of the State of Washington, Article I Section 16 and the laws of the
State of Washington RCW 35.22.280(6) allow the City to purchase or appropriate private property for public
use upon making just compensation to the owners pursuant to RCW Chapter 8.12.
WHEREAS, the City has determined that it is in the City's best interest to cooperate with and
facilitate the City of Spokane's completion of the Havana Street Overpass Project, as set forth in City of
Spokane Public Works file number 2004062
WHEREAS, the property identified in Exhibit "A" is necessary to complete the Project
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane has represented that it has negotiated in good faith for the
acquisition of the property identified in Exhibit A, but the parties are unable to agree upon the purchase price.
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 8.25.290, notice has been mailed to each and every property owner of
records, as indicated on the tax rolls of Spokane County according to such addresses shown on such rolls, at
least ftfteen (15) days prior to the City Council taking final action on this ordinance, including publication of
notice of this ordinance in the Spokesman Review and the Spokane Valley News Heraid for two (2)
consecutive weeks before finat action by the City Council_
NOW, THEREFORE, The City of Spokane Valley does ordain:
Section 1. Public use and necessity requires the City of Spokane Valley to acquire the land and
property, and interests therein, as described in Exhibits "A" and "B°, together with such additional temporary
construction easements as are deemed necessary by the City of Spokane, for public purposes in order to
complete the Havana Street Bridge Project, including utilities and related improvements, all as set forth in City
of Spokane Public Works file number 2004062.
Section 2. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Interlocal Agreement, a copy of which is
attached hereto as Exhibit °C", the City Attorney and duly appointed Special Counsel are hereby authorized
and directed to commence an action or actions in the Superior Court of Spokane County, State of
Washington, in the name of the City of Spokane Val{ey, to aoquire and take by eminent domain the lands and
property interests necessary to be acquired for the purposes set forth herein, the lands and property interests
Page 1 of 20
llRA FT
to be so taken situate in the City of Spoicane Valley, County of Spokane, all in the State of Washington, and
more specifically described in Exhibits "A° and "B°, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof,
together with such amendments thereto and such additionaf temporary construction easements as are
deemed necessary by City staff to complete the project.
Secaon 3. The Office of the City Attomey for the City of Spokane is hereby for the purposes set
forth herein appointed as special counsel to the City of Spokane Valley. Said fiRn shall provide all {egal
services in conjunction with the Office of the City Attomey for the purpose of representing the joint interests of
the City of Spokane Valley and the City of Spokane as expressed in this ordinance.
Section 4. That compensation for the land and property interests described in Exhibit "A" and "B"
and all associated costs, expenses, damages and attomey fees shall be solely payable by the City of
Spokane from fund account number 3200-94991-95200-56102, and funds which are allocated toward the
Havana Street Bridge Project by the City of Spokane Department of Construction Services, pursuant to file
number 2004062.
PASSED by the City of Spokane Valley City Council this day of , 2009.
MAYOR
Attest:
City Clerk
Approved As To Form:
Office of the City Attorney
Date of Publication:
Effective Date:
Page 2 of 20
nRAf-r
Exhibit "A"
Legal Description of Take
1 Iitc Acuuisition (Portion af'Asscssor's I'ar-cc l No. J , ;1.4 2.90 11 i
All that portion of the northwest quartcr of Section 14, Township 2r, N., Rance. 41, f;.W.P•1., 1}-irig
within the hereinafter described Parcel "A" described as follow:
Beginning at the intersection of the north right of way line of Broadway Avenue and the east right
of way of Havana Street; said point of beginning bears N.88°12'37"E., 30.00 feet from the west
section line of said Section 14 and N.01°59'41"W., 30.00 feet from the West 1/4 corner of said
Section 14; thence N.O 1 °59'41" W., along the east right of way line of Havana Street, 300.00 feet;
thence N.88° 12'37"E., 50.00 feet; thence S.O 1°5941 "E., 70.00 feet; thence S.43°06'28"W., 63.53
feet; thence S.0 1°59'41"E., parallel to and 5.00 feet east of the east right of way line of Havana
Street, 175.00 feet; thence S.46°53'32"E., 14.17 feet, to the north right of way line of Broadway
Avenue, thence S.88°12'37"W., along said north right of way line, 15.00 feet to the point of
beginning.
:
Parcel "A'"
That partiun of tlie Southwest auarter of tlle Ni►rthwcst quarter of tiectir,rl 14.
Township 25 North, Range 43 Cast. W.M., in thu City of Spokane Valle}, Spokane County,
Washington, ilescribed as follows:
BEGINNING at the intersection of the North line of f3roadNvaN Avenuc and the Fast line of
Havana Street;
Thence North 3U0 feet alon~~ the 11a51 line ofA {avana Street;
Thence Fast 300 feet;
Thence South 300 feet to the NonIi linc pf Bi'OaCj-w1V :1venue:
Thence West 300 feet tt) the 1'01N"I C)F CiFO11NItiG;
(Contain~; S.? 1 ~ ,q. ti.l
I(itc: Accutsi[iun Portion of Asscssor's I'arcel No._;>_(4?.9078}
All that portion ofthe northwest quarter of Scction 11, -I t-mnship 'S ti., ftaniC 4_~, I:.W.ti1., l" ing
within the hereinafter descrihcd Parcel "A" descrit,ied as follo«~
E3eginning on lhe east right of way line of Havana Strcet, said point ot' Ueginning b.ars
N.88012'37"E., 30.00 feet; thence N.O 1 059'41 "W., 330.00 feet, from the West corner of said
Section 14; thence N.01°59'41"W., along said east right of way line, 60.00 feet to the northwest
comer of said parcel; thence N.88°121TE., along the north line of said parcel 50.00 feet; thence
S.01059'41"E., 60.00 feet, to the south linc of said liarcel: thence S.88'12"3?"W.. alon-, said soiith
line, _50.00 fect, tt-} the point of heginning.
I'arcel "A":
That portion of the Southwcst qtiarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 14, Township 2-S North,
Range 43 East, V4'.M., in the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Vr'ashitigton, described as
follou•s:
BEGiNNING at the intersection of the T`orth line of I3roadway Elvenue anJ the F.a:t line of
Havana Street;
Page 3 of 20
DRr1FT
Thcnce North 300 feet along said East line tn the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
Thence continuing North 60 feet along said East line;
Thence East 300 feet;
Thence South 60 feet;
Thence West 300 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEG[?vNING.
(Contains 3,000 sq. ft.)
Page 4 of 20
URr1 FI'
Exhibit "B"
Leqal Description of Tempora,ry Construction Easement
Hite Temporary Construction Easement (Portion of Assessor's Parcel No. 35142.9041 ~
A 10 foot wide TemnnranY C'nnstnrctinn Fasei11?t?t Ivin7 east of -,rnd nilizc~,rt rc) ti,
described par(
All that portio:. L..41.1~t.~
t
within the hereinafter described Parcel "A" described as follow:
,~ginning at the intersection of the north right of way line of Broadway Avenue and the east right
~ way of Havana Street; said point of beginning bears N.$8112'37"E., 30.00 feet Gom the west
ction line of said Section 14 and N.4 ]°59'4 l"W., 30.00 feet from the West 1/4 corner of said
~ction 14; ihence N.01 °59'4 W., along the east right of way line of Havana Street, 300.00 feet;
~ ience N.88112'37"E., 50.00 feet; thence S.O 1059'4 t"E., 70.06 feet; thence S.43°06'28"W., 63.53
:_~er, thence S.41 °59'41 "E., parallel to and 5.00 feet east of the east right of way line of Havana
,-ireet, 175.00 feet; thence 5.46°53'32"E., 14.17 feet, to the north right of way line of Broadway
venue, thence S.88° 12'37"W., along said north right of way line, 15.00 feet to the point of
i~c,_-inning.
owrtship 25 North, Range 43 East, W.M., in the Cin- of Spokane Val le.,,Snt,1:-L:nc C'Ount%,
BL(1IN'.\[N6 Ih:: lii[L1`,"t;lll)ii Ul Il1C i\orIf1 l111C l}1 {iCoadk1,1\ :~~~Illl; aild Il1: hlic ot
t I avana Street;
-t hence North 300 feet along the East line of Havana Streec:
1'hence East 300 feet;
"i-hence South 300 feet to the North line of Broadwav Avenuc;
NVt•,t _,r►{) f«c to thc I'O1N I- i?I 13LGIN\(tiG:
I fitc• 'I_un> >t,rar• Cwns!_ructinn E_aS'crntnt ! F'ortion nC r\~,scssur's 1'arcelNc~_,i l 4?.9U78;
A] C) fuot wide I cmporar~ Con~truction Lasement tast of and adjacent to the foltowin- (lescrihc;i
.Ail that ptirtion ol'the nonhmes, quail.r of Section 1-1, Ti~wn;hip 25 N.. Ita1zg< f:.\VA-Z . lvirill,
within thc hcrcin,3Tt;:r dzsrribed I'arcri "A" clcscrihet? ati
f3c.~inninL., ori tlt~ east riy*ilt o; Iiilc of f1ava»a titi-ect, said point uf' Gc~;innitl~ bears
N.880I 2'37"E., 30.00 feet; thence N.0 [°59'4 i"W., 330.00 feet, fram the West 'h corner of said
Section 14; thence N.01159'41"W., along said east right of way line, 64.00 feet to the northwest
corner of said parcel; thence N.88012'3T'E., along the north line of said parcel 54.00 feet; thence
5.01°59'41"E., 60.00 feet, to the south line of said parcel; thence S.88112'37"W., alon~ S.,id sou~l)
lint~, SO.OC! fect, tk) thc ~~oir~t of 1~~~~~~innin~~. ~
A!1d i}Tc' north l() 1Clci o? I}i~: 175.22 t:c'l7 c't.~cpf t}ic \tcti! 50 f~:ci of lhr_ I?~'r:iil;tiit'; c~,•~.~iii~~~I
parrel
Page 5 of 20
DRAFT
E'arcel "A":
That portion of t}ie Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Scction 14, To%vr►ship 25 North,
Range 43 East, W.M., in the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, described as
follows:
BEGINNING at the intcrsectiun of ltie Norch li►ie of IIroadwa}, Avenue and the L-:ast line of
Havana Street;
Thence North 300 feet alonb said East line to the TRUE PUINTOF I3EGINNING;
Thence continuing North 60 feet along said I:ast line;
Thence East 300 feet;
Thence South 60 feet;
Thence West 300 feet to the 7'KUE POINT 0F BcGnvrrrNc.
(Contains 1,723 sq. ft.)
Page 6 of 20
DRAFT
Exhibit "C"
Interlocal AQreement
Return to: City of Spokane
Attn: Clerk
808 W Spokane Falls Blvd
Spokane, WA 99201
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SPOKANE AND THE CITY OF
SPOKANE VALLEY REGARDING ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY BY EMINENT
DOMAIN FOR THE HAVANA STREET BRIDGE PROJECT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and befinreen the City of Spokane,
a Washington municipal corporation, and the City of Spokane Valley, a Washington
municipal corporation, jointly hereinafter referred to as the uparties."
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane is a first class charter city duly organized and
existing under and by virtue of the constitution and laws of the State of Washington, and
the Charter of the City; and
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley is a code city duly organized and existing
under and by virtue of the constitution and laws of the State of Washington; and
WHEREAS, the laws of the State of Washington (RCW 35.22.280(7)) provide that
the City of Spokane may establish, open, aiter, widen, extend, and otherwise improve
streets, alleys, avenues, sidewalks, and other public property in order to promote the best
interest of the City; and
WHEREAS, the laws of the State of Washington (RCW 35A.21.160) provide that
the City of Spokane Valley possesses all of the powers which any city of any class may
have; and
Page 7 of 20
nxAFr
WHEREAS, the Constitution of the State of Washington, Article I Section 16 and
the laws of the State of Washington allow cities to purchase or appropriate private property
for public use upon making just compensation to the owners pursuant to Chapter 8.12
RCW; and
WHEREAS, RCW 8.12.030 authorizes cities to condemn land and property for
streets and bridges within the limits of such cities; and
WHEREAS, the parties have determined that it is in the best interests of both cities
to construct the Havana Street Bridge Project, as set forth in the City of Spokane Public
Works File Number 2004062 (hereinafter the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, the property described in this Agreement is necessary to complete the
Project; and
WHEREAS, said property which is necessary to complete the Project is tocated
within the corporate limits of the City of Spokane Valley; and
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley has agreed to assist the City of Spokane in
acquiring such property according to the terms of this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, Havana Street forms the corporate boundary between the City of
Spokane and the City of Spokane Valley, but in places the eastern half of Havana Street
remains unincorporated and under the care and responsibility of Spokane County; and
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane is engaged in discussions with Spokane County
that will result in the revision of the City of Spokane's corporate boundary to coincide with
the eastem edge of Havana Street so as to fully include Havana Street within the
corporate limits of the City of Spokane at all places where Havana Street lies on the City of
Spokane's eastern corporate limits; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 39.34 RCW authorizes parties to enter into agreements for
joint or cooperative action to exercise any power or powers, privileges, or authority
exercised or capable of exercise by either of the parties; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 8.25.290, notice has been mailed to each and every
property owner of records, as indicated on the tax rolls of Spokane County according to
such addresses shown on such rolls, at least fifteen (15) days prior to the City Council
taking final action on this Agreement and related ordinance, including publication of notice
of the ordinance in the Spokesman Review and Spokane Valley News Herald for finro (2)
consecutive weeks before final action by the City Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the facts and recitals set forth
hereinabove, which are adopted herein and made a part of this Agreement and which the
parties mutually agree constitute good and adequate consideration for the obligations of
the parties set forth herein, the parties hereby agree as follows:
Page 8 of 20
DRAFT
SECTION N0.1: PURPOSE
The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth certain agreements between the City of
Spokane and the City of Spokane Valley relating to acquisition of privately owned land and
property by eminent domain as is necessary for construction of the Project.
SECTION NO. 2: APPLICABILITY OF THIS AGREEMENT
The parties agree that the provisions of this Agreement shall apply to the land and
property described in the ordinance attached hereto as Exhibit "A" ("Eminent Domain
Ordinance").
SECTION NO. 3: ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY BY EMINENT DOMAIN
Upon final action or legislative approval of the Eminent Domain Ordinance by the City of
Spokane Valley, the Office of City Attomey for the City of Spokane may commence an
action or actions in the Superior Court of Spokane County, State of Washington, in the
name of the City of Spokane Valley, to acquire and take by eminent domain the lands and
property interests described in the Eminent Domain Ordinance (the uProperty"), the parties
having found that the Property described therein is necessary for the Project. The title to
the Property shall vest in the City of Spokane Valley for public street purposes and all uses
incidental thereto, subject to such rights as the City of Spokane determines are necessary,
in its sole discretion, for constructing the Project, maintaining the subsequently improved
public right-of-way, and enforcement of traffic-related laws and regulations.
SECTION NO. 4: RELOCATION ASSISTANCE
Relocation assistance shall be made available to eligible owners and tenants of the
Property. Responsibility for any such costs shall be borne by the City of Spokane as set
forth in Section No. 5 below.
SECTION NO. 5: RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACQUISITION COSTS
In recognition that the City of Spokane has assumed responsibility for construction of
the Project and that acquis'rtion of the Property is necessary for the Project, as between
the parties, the City of Spokane shall be responsible and hereby agrees to pay all
Acquisition Costs relating to the Property, as the term Acquisition Costs is defined in
this section. For purposes of this Agreement, Acquisition Costs means any and all costs
pertaining to efforts to acquire and acquisition of the Property. Without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, such costs may include: (a) amounts payable as part of any
voluntary agreement and/or settlement relating to acquisition of the Property; (b) amounts
awarded by a courtrjury to the owner(s) of the Property as just compensation following
trial, including any attomeys fees and costs awarded by the court to the owner(s) and/or
their attomeys; (c) amounts paid to the owner(s) of the Property and/or their attomeys as
attomeys fees and costs upon discontinuance and/or abandonment of efforts to acquire
Page 9 of 20
DRAFT
the Property by eminent domain; (d) any relocation assistance paid to such owner(s) or
seiler(s), whether or not required under Chapter 8.26 RCW; and (e) costs of necessary
appraisals and title insurance to acquire the Property.
SECTION NO. 6: INDEMNITY
The City of Spokane shail defend, indemnify and hold the City of Spokane Valley, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries,
damages, tosses or suits including attomey fees, arising out of or in connection with the
performance of this agreement, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole
negligence of the City of Spokane Valley.
Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this agreement is subject to
RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to
persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence
of the City of Spokane and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, and the City
of Spokane Valley, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, the City of
Spokane's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the City of Spokane's
negligence, or that of its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers.
SECTION NO. 7: CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
The parties acknowledge that they, with the support of counsel, appraisers, and other
consultants, are engaging in a cooperative venture for their joint benefit. In furtherance
of this cooperative venture and the parties' common interests in obtaining the Property,
the parties and their respective legal counsel agree to share information relating to such
efforts. Such exchanges and disclosures will be for the exclusive purpose of facilitating
the parties' common interests in the acquisition of the Property and will not diminish in
any way the confidentiality of the materials exchanged, nor will this exchange constitute
a waiver of any of the parties' attorney-client or work product privileges. To the extent
allowed by law, and consistent with the parties' respective obligations under the Public
Records Act, Chapter 42.56 RCW, the parties each agree to preserve and protect the
confidentiality of all financial, valuation, and other proprietary information that they may
obtain, and to create and preserve any applicable attorney/client and litigation work
product privileges, and public record disclosure exemptions, in compliance with
applicable State law.
SECTION NO. 8: CONTROL OF PROJECT
Although the parties may consult and assist the City of Spokane with the acquisition of
the Property and the Project, the City of Spokane shall retain final decision making
authority and discretion regarding such acquisition and the completion of the Project.
The City of Spokane shall pay the cos#s and expenses to be incurred in connection with
the construction of the Project.
SECTION NO. 9: ADMINISTRATION
Page 10 of 20
nRAFr
The City of Spokane hereby designates its City Attorney as its representative for the
purpose of implementing this Agreement. The City of Spokane Valley hereby designates
its City Attomey as fts representative for the purpose of implementing this Agreement.
SECTION NO. 10: TERMINATION
This Agreement may be terminated at any time by mutual written consent of the C':
Spokane and the City of Spokane Valk
SECTION N0.11: DEFAU l
It shall be an uEvent of Default" under this Agreement rf either of the parties to perform,
`.)serve, or comply with the covenants, agreements, or conditions on its part contained in
is Agreement, where that failure continues for a period of fifteen (15) days after written
)tice from the non-defaulting party.
5ECTlON NO. 12: REMEDlES
In the event of any Event of Default, the non-defaulting party may at any time, without
wraiving or limi#ing any other right or remedy, pursue any remedy allowed by law including,
by way of example and without limftation, specific performance, declaratory judgment, and
other equitable remedies, and recovery of attorney's fees and other costs for such
enforcement action.
SECTION NO. 13: NOTICE
All notices shall be in writing and served on any of the PARTIES either personally or by
certified mail, retum receipt requested, to the persons below designated as contact
persons. Notices sent by certified mail shall be deemed served when deposited in the
United State mail, postage prepaid.
ClTY OF SPOKANE- City Attorney
808 West Spokane Falfs Blvd
Spokane, Washington 99201
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY: Gity Attomey
11707 E Sprague, Room 103
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
SECTtON NO. 14: AGREEMENT TO BE FILED
The City of Spokane shall fiie this Agreement with its City Clerk and with the County
Auditor. The City of Spokane Valley shall file this Agreement with its City Clerk.
SECTION NO, 15: COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
Page 11 of 20
DRAFT
The parties shall observe all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances and
regulations in conjunction with meeting their respective obligations under the terms of
this Agreement.
SECTION NO. 16: VENUE STIPULATION
The laws of the State of Washington shall be applicable to the construction and
enforcement of this Agreement. Any action at law, suit in equity or judicial proceeding
regarding this Agreement shall be instituted only in courts of competent jurisdiction
within Spokane County, Washington.
SECTION NO. 17: MODIFICATION
No modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be valid until the same is
reduced to writing and executed with the same formalities as this present Agreement.
SECTION N0.18: WAIVER
No officer, employee, agent or otherwise of any party has the power, right or authority to
waive any of the conditions or provisions of this Agreement. No waiver of any breach of
this Agreement shall be held to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach. All
remedies afforded in this Agreement or at law shall be taken and construed as cumulative,
that is, in addition to every other remedy provided herein or by law.
SECTION NO. 19: ALL WRITINGS CONTAINED HEREIN
This Agreement contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. No other
understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement shall be
deemed to exist or to bind the parties. The parties have read and understand all of this
Agreement, and now state that no representation, promise or agreement not expressed in
this Agreement has been made to induce any of them to execute it.
SECTION NO. 20: HEADINGS
The section headings in this Agreement have been inserted solely for the purpose of
convenience and ready reference. In no way do they purport to, and shall not be deemed
to, define, limit or extend the scope or intent of the sections to which they pertain.
SECTION NO. 21: SEVERABILITY
In the event any portion of this Agreement should become invalid, or otherwise
unenforceable, the rest of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION NO. 22: BINDING EFFECT
Both parties warrant that they have the full power and authority to execute and deliver this
Agreement and to perform their respective obligations under this Agreement. This
Page 12 of 20
nRAr°r
Agreement constitutes a valid and legally binding obligation of both parties and is
enforceable in accordance with its provisions.
SECTI4N NO. 23: TIME IS OF THE E~q1`:N1(' P
Time is of the essence of this Agreemen
SECTION NO. 24: RCW 39.34 REQUIRED CLAUSES.
A PURPOSE.
See Section No. 10 above.
C. ORGANlZATIaN OF SEPf;RATE CN i(T`r AND ITS POWERS.
See Section No. 9 above. No separate legal entity is necessary in conjunction with
this Agreement.
D. RESF'ONSIQILITIES OF THE PARTIES.
See provisions above.
E. AGREEMENT TO BE FILED.
See Section No. 14 above.
F. FlNANCING.
See Section No. 5 above.
G. TERMINATION.
See Section No. 10 above.
H. PROPERTY UPON TERMINATION.
See Section No. 3.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, thc PARTIES have caused this Agreer-nent to be
executed on date and year opposite their respective signatures.
DATED: CITY OF SPOKANE
Pane 13 of 20
U ftA FT
By:
ItS:
Attest: Approved as to form:
City Clerk Assistant City Attorney
DATED: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
By:
Its:
Attest: Approved as to form:
City Clerk City Attomey
Page 14 of 20
DRA FI'
Exhibit A
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ACQUISITION BY EMINENT DOMAIN OF CERTAIN
LANDS NECESSARY TO BE ACQUIRED FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES IN CONNECTI4N WiTH THE
HAVANA STREET BRIDGE PROJECT, LOCATED IN THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, COUNTY OF
SPOKANE, STATE OF WASHINGTON
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Cir,r of Spakane Valley, `Nash+ngton (the "City") is a code city dui,i oraanized and
existing under and by virtue of the constitution and laws of the State of Washington.
WHEREAS, the laws of the Sta'te of Washington (RCW 35A.21.160) provide that tiie City possesses
all of the powers tivhich aiiy city of any class may havE; and
WHEREAS, the Iaws of tne State of Washington, RCW 35.22.280(7) provide that the City may
establish, open, alter, widen, extend, and otherwise improve streets, altey, avenues, sidewaiks, and athe,
public property in order to promote the best interest of the City.
WHEREAS, the Constitution of the State of Wasi-iirigton, Article I Section 16 and the laws ol' ttle
State of Washington RCW 35.22.280(6) allow the City to purchase or appropriate private property for public
use upon making just compensation to the owners pursuant to RCW Chapter 8.12
WHEREAS, the City has determined that it is in the City's best interest to cooperate with and
facilitate the City of Spokane's completion of the Havana Street Overpass Project, as set forth in City of
Spokane Public Works file number 2004062.
WHEREAS, the property identified in Exhibit "A" is necessary to complete the Projec:
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane has represented that it has negotiated in good faith for the
acquisiton of the property identified in Exhibit A, but the parties are unable to agree upon the purchase price.
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 8.25.290, notice has been mailed to each and every property owner of
records, as indicated on the tax rolls of Spokane County according to such addresses shown on such rolls, at
least fifteen (15) days prior to the City Council taking final action on this orclinance, including publication of
notice of this ordinance in the Spokesman Review the Spokane Valley News Herald for two (2) consecutive
weeks before final action by the City Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, The City of Spokane Valley does ordain:
Section 1. Public use and necessity requires the City of Spokane Valley to acquire the land and
property, and interests therein, as described in Exhibits "A" and "B", together with such additional temporary
construction easements as are deemed necessary the City of Spokane, for public purposes in order to
complete the Havana Street Bridge Project, including utilities and refated improvements, all as set forth in City
of Spokane Public Works file number 2004062.
Sectian 2. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Interiocal Agreement, a copy of which is
attached hereto as Exhibit "C", the City Attomey and duly appointed Special Counsel are hereby authorized
and directed to commence an action or actions in the Superior Court of Spokane County, State of
Washington, in the name of the City of Spokane Valley, to acquire and take by eminent domain the lands and
property interests necessary to be acquired for the purposes set forth herein, the lands and property interests
to be so taken situate in the City of Spokane Valley, County of Spokane, al1 in the State of Washington, and
more specifically described in Exhibits "A" and "B°, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof,
Page 16 of 20
DRAF'T
together with such amendments thereto and such additional temporary construction easements as are
deemed necessary by City staff to oomplete the project.
Section 3. The Office of the City Attomey for the City of Spokane is hereby for the purposes set
forth herein appointed as special counsel to the City of Spokane Valley. Said firm shall provide all legal
services in conjunction with the Office of the City Attomey for the purpose of representing the joint interests of
the City of Spokane Valley and the City of Spokane as expressed in this ordinance.
Section 4. That compensabon for the land and property interests described in Exhibit "A" and "B"
and all associated costs, expenses, damages and attomey fees shall be solely payable by the City of
Spokane from fund account number 3200-94991-95200-56102, and funds which are allocated toward the
Havana Street Bridge Project by the City of Spokane Department of Construction Services, pursuant to file
number 2004062.
PASSED by the City of Spokane Valley City Council this day of , 2009.
MAYOR
Attest:
City Clerk
Page 16 of 20
DRAFT
Exhibit "A"
Lega( Description of Take
Hite Acquisition tPortion of Assessor's Parcel Na. 35142.9041~
Al l that porcion of the northwest quarter of Section 14, To-A~n
within the hereinafter described Parcet "A" described as foilo
Beginning at the intersection of the north right of way line of broad,-vay Avenuc; cuid ttic: east rigi-C
of way of Havana Street; said point of beginning bears N.88012'37"E., 30.00 feet from the wesi,
section line of said Section 14 and N.01°59'41"W., 30.00 feet from the West Y. corner of said
Section 14; thence N.01 159'41" W., along the sast right of way line of Havana Street, 300.00 feet;
thence N.88°12'3T'E., 50.00 feet; thence S.0 1159'41"E., 70.00 feei; thence S.43°06'28"W., 63.53
1'-et; thence S.0 I159'41"E., parallel to and 5.00 feet east of the east right of way line of Havana
cet, 175.00 feet; thence S.46°5332"E., 14.17 feet, to the north right of way line of Broadway
enue, thence 5.88°12'37"W., atong said north right of way line, 15.00 feet to the point of
~ Jnning.
i :rcel "A'":
i iiai portion of the Southwest quarter of chc Narthwest quarter of Section 14,
Iownship 25 North, Range 43 East, W.M., in tlie City of Spokane Valley. Spokane t'c►unc\.
Washington, described as follows:
hEGIT(NING at the intersection of' the North line of Broadway A%enue and tht F:ast iine ol'
E lavana Strect;
Thence North 300 feet along the East line of Havana Streec:
"I"Izence East 300 feet;
'rhence South 300 feet to the North line of Broadtivav Avenut:
Thence weg 300 feet to chc por?vT or BrGttvNlNC,;
(C'ontains 5,712 sq. ft.)
1_lite Acyuisition (I'ortion of'Assessor's Yarcel Ivo. 35142.907S)
AII [hat portion of the northwest quarter of Section 14, Townshil, 25 ti, R.m-e -I-,, I:.t1' Itiin2
tti ichin the hereina.fter described Parce) "A" described as folloti+:
13eginning vn the east right of way line of Havana Street, said point ot beginnin- bears
N.88°12'3T'E., 30.00 feet; thence N.0I°59'41"W., 330.00 feet, from the West 1/4 cornzr of said
Section 14; thence N.O 1°59'41 "W., along said east right of way line, 60.00 feet to the northwest
ct,rner of said parcel; thence N.88012'37"E., along the north line of said parcel 50.00 feet; thence
S.01°59'41"E., 60.00 feet, to the south line of said parcel; thence 5.881 12'37"W., alonQ said south
line, 50.00 feet. to the point of beginning.
I'a.rcel "A":
Thai portion oi the Southwcst quarter of'tlte Northµ•est quarter of Section 14, "I'ownship 25 Nortii.
Range 43 East, W.M., in thc City of Spakane Va11ev, Spokane Counry, Washin,ton, described
fol(o%~s - -
BEGINNItii; ir( i!l:' Ntl:ill i111~ ni ;1vc;.'_il:C liiC ]','i:t
I iavana Strec*:
Page 17 of 20
DRAV1'
Thence North 300 feet along said East line to the TRUE POINT UF BEGINNING;
Thence continuing North 60 feet along said East line;
Thence East 300 feet;
Thence South 60 feet;
Thence West 300 feet to the TRUE POIN7' OF BEGTNNING.
(Contains 3,000 sq. ft.)
Page 18 of 20
nRAF'r
Exhibit "B"
Legal Description of Temporary Construction Easement
Hite Temporary Construction Easement (Portion of Assessor's Parcel No. 35142.90q 1)
A 10 foot wide Temnorar~- Consmiccion Fasement lvin~ cast of ancl adjacent to thc r; s?!~ :r~,•
described parrL
AU that portior-, t-i ii1~_ iiVllli'A~::;i ~iii.i;t~; ii l~~ii~~ii i•4. 1 00 :tJlklf? ~~aiil`.L
within the hereinafter described Parcel "A" described as follow:
-;inning at the intersection of the north right of way line of Broadway Avenue aod the east right
way of Havana Street; said point of beginning bears N.88°12'37"E., 30.00 feet from the west
; cion line of said Section 14 and N.O 1°5941 "W., 30.00 feet from the Wcst 1/4 corner of said
---tion 14; thence N.O 1°59'4 l" W., along the east right of way line of Havana Street, 300.00 feet;
:nce N.88°12'37"E., 50.00 feet; thence 5.01°59'41"E., 70.04 feet; thence S.43106'28"Vtr., 63.53
:t; thence S.01 °5941 "E., parallei to and 5.00 feet east of the east right of way line of Havana
ti:reet, 175.00 feet; thence S.46°53'32"E., 14.17 feet, to the north right of way line of Broadway
:11Nenue, thence S.88°12'37"W., along said north rieht of way line, 15.00 feet to the point of
i,. -ianing.
l'arcel "A":
i liat portion of the Southwest quarter ot'the Norttiwest quarter of Section 14.
I ownship 25 North, Range 43 Fast, W.M., in the City of Spokane Vailey, Spokane Countv.
W'ashington, described as fallows:
I3EGINNING ai the intersection of the North line of I3roadwav A\,enue and the F-.ast lin;: cif
1 lavana Street;
l hence North 300 feet along the F.ast line of Havana Street:
1 hence East 340 feet;
I hence South 300 feet to the North line of Broadway Aveniie;
I iience West 300 feet to the POINT OF BEGTNNING:
(Contains 3,236 sq. ft.)
t ltte Temporary Constructiuu Lasenient ( t'urtiun oi flssessor's Narcel No. 35l,l?.yl)7N
L)
,A 10 foot wide Temporary Constnictian Easement east of and adjacent to the followinL, cicscrihtud
parcrl:
AIl t1iztt portion ofthe north«c,t qttar-ter of Scction ]•l, "1t,~tir~:l~iE~ 25 N.. PaJ1`;e I.,. It'IIl',
ttiihltl tlle lieCc:[2a#ter clcscribrcl I'aICiI -A" ch:sCTIbc'di15 tn;km; -
E3C'`.:illlililLl ()Il lflc Lii~l f11.~',fa l)t \ti"i3\ IlI1C of fi.3~iiTl3 SifC'tL, Si]Id pt11Ri Ut bL~klll]Illka' bL'71"s
ti.88012'37"E., 30.00 feet; thence N.01°59'41"W., 330.00 feet, from the West 1/4 corner of said
Section 14; thence N.0 I°59'41"W., along said east right of way line, 60.00 feet to the northwest
coraer of said parcel; thence N.88°12'37"E., along the north line of said pazcel 50.00 feet; thence
S.0I059'41"E., 60.00 feet, to the south line of said parcel; thence S.88112'37"W., alon: i,.iid souc}t
linc, _50.00 teet, tt, the point of beginning.
And the north 10 feet of the west 175.22 feet, except th< wctit 50 fcet ufth~: hereinaf?er describcd
parcel ";1".
PagF 19 of 20
nRAFr
Parcel "A'":
That portion of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 14, "Township 25 North,
Range 43 East, W.M., in the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, described as
follows:
BEGINNING at the intersection of the North line of I3roadway Avenue and the Cast line of
Havana Street;
Thence North 300 feet along said East line to the '['RL.►L POINT'OF BEGINNING;
Thence continuing North 60 feet along said East line;
Thence East 300 feet;
Thence South 60 feet;
Thence West 300 feet to the TRtJE POINT OF BEG[NNING.
(Contains 1,723 sq. ft.)
Page 20 of 20
CiTY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: March 31, 2009 City Manager Sign-off:
ttem: Check alt that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ~ new business ❑ pub(ic heanr,,;
❑ infomnation ~ admin. report ❑ pending (egislatio; ;
.=~C,}KGjiUUtVU:
)e Spokane Valley Municipai Code (SVMC 17.80.140) establishes an annual comprehensive pian
iiiendment cycle that runs from November 2"d to November 1s' of the following year. The Planning
:ommission considers applications received prior to Novem ber 1 st in late spring of the following year, with a
,;ecision by City Council in late spring/early summer.
parts of the Comprehensive Plan can be amended during the annual cycle. The Community Development
Department received one site specific Comprehensive Pian amendment by November 1, 2008 deadline, city
staff initiated three site specific map amendments. Sites that are approved for a Comprehensive Plan
Limendment will automatically receive a zoning designation that is consistent with the new land use
desiqnation.
r;s par~ of iht 2009 Cor7iprehensive Plan am.endrrlent process, the City vf Spokanc Vailey is analyzing the
public/Quasi-Public land use designation on an area-wide basis and determining appropriate land use
designations. This analysis will focus on policies and goals set forth in the fand use chapter, adjacent zoning
ciFsignations, and Title 19.120 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC).
1-he 2009 Comprehensive Plan text amendments include amendments to four Comprehensive Plan Elements:
Chapter 2- Land Use, Chapter 3- Transportation, Chapter 4-- Capitai Facilities, and Chapter 8- Natura!
Environment. The amendments may also entai( minor changes to other elements referencing the proposed
amendments.
Staff presented the proposed amendments to the Planning Commissian at a study session on February 26,
2009. The Ptanning Commission held a public hearing on the amendments on March 12, 2009. This public
fiearing was continued to the Commission's March 26, 2009 meeting. Staff is scheduled to provide Council with
ttie Planning Comm;ssion's recommendations and findings at the April 14, 2009 Council meeting.
PUBLIC NOTICE:
Notice for the proposed amendments was placed in the Spokane Valley News Herald on February 20, 2009
and each site was posted with a"Notice of Public Hearing" sign, with a description of the proposal. Individual
notice of the proposals was mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of each amendment.
SEPA REYIEW:
Pursuant to the State Environm ental Policy Act (SEPA - RCW 43.21 C) environm ental checklists were required
for each proposed comprehensive plan amendment. Under SEPA, amendments to the comprehensive plan
are considered "non-project actions" which are defined as actions involving decis+ons on polici?s, plans. or
1 of ~
programs that contain standards controlling use or modification of the environment. Additional environmental
review may be required for the physical development of the subject properties.
Staff reviewed the environmental checklists and issued a threshold determination for each comprehensive plan
amendment request. Determ inations of Non-significance (DNS) were issued for the requested co mprehensive
plan amendments. The DNS's were published in the City's official newspaper consistent with the State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code
(SVMC).
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PROPOSALS:
Comprehensive plan amendment proposals are organized into individual reports consisting of application
materials, staff reports, comprehensive plan maps, zoning maps, aerial maps, vicinity maps, transportation
maps, and comments submitted to date to assist the City Council in their review.
OPTIONS: Consensus to proceed with first reading scheduled for April 14, 2009
STAFF CONTACT: Greg McCormick, AICP, Planning Division Manager; Mike Basinger, AICP, Senior
Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit 1: 2009 Com prehensive Plan Amendment Docket
Exhibit 2: Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments Overview Map
Exhibit 3: Individual Staff Reports
Exhibit 4: Amended chapter text and maps
2of2
Exhibit 1
City of Spokane Valley
2009 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket
PRiVATELY INITIATED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SITE SPECIFIC MAP AMENDMENTS
File Number Ma or Text Summa of Amendment
CPA-01-09 Map 4'n and Sullivan - change from LDR to HDR.
CITY INITIATED COMPRENSlVE PLAN SITE SPECIFIC MAP AMENDMENTS
File Number Ma or Text Summa of Amendment
CPA-02-09 Map NE corner of Sullivan/4 from HDR to NC
CPA-03-09 I Map Mullan/Argonne/Sinto from O to C
CPA-04-09 ~ Map Progress/Riverside from C to LDR
CITY INITIATED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENTS
File Number ~ Map or Text 1 Summary of Amendment
CPA-05-~9 Text Chapter 2- Land Use: Update Tabie 2.1 with new
Map 2.1 land quantity analysis information; Update/add
annexation goa Is, policies and text.
Chapter 2- Land Use Map updates:
1. P/QP - re-evaluate all properties designated
public/quasi-public and a djust as appropriate;
2. Correct series of minor mapping errors;
CPA-06-09 Text Chapter 3- Transportation: Add text for new bike
Map 3.2 classification; add new bike lanes that are complete or
will be by the end of the construction season:
- Montgomery from Woodruff to University
- Wellesley from Evergreen to Progress
- Mansfield from Montgomery to SR 27
CPA-07-09 Text Chapter 4- Capital Faciliti es and Public Services:
Map 4.1 Update 6-year TIP; update Water Districts &
Map 4.3 Wellheads map; update Parks & Recreation msp;
Map 4.5 update 6-year Sewer map; add annexation area level
of senrice language.
CPA-08-09 Map 8.1 Chapter 8- Natural Environment: update Wetlands
Map 8.3 map; update Fish & Wildlife Habitat map
Updated: 10/30/08.
P:1Community DevelopmentlLong Range PtanninglComprehensive Ptan11 Comp Plan Amendme+its12009 Comp Plan
AmendmentslA Dockel12009 Amendment Dacket.doc
~~~t, ~ r _ ~ra~s~ _ . - ° _ - - - - - - ~ ~ - ~ - ~ s - ~ tr ~ _ _ ~ a y,. L~ P , _ - ° ~ ]
I ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ r F].e~rld~ ~ t fi ~ i ty ' - ~ , ~ ~ ~ s
, i a . . ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ r~ ~n~i~~ o~ ~ i , DI1s1ve
~ o ± o . , ~ ~ ~ I ~ ' ~s ~ a; + 3(. « ~ j ~ ~ ~ ti rntiiie _ ~4 . , ~ ~ ~
s ~ I+l Il~~, ~ ~ ~ ~l ~ t ~ ~ C1dments
~ i Emitt~ ~ ` ~ ; ~ ~ h ~ ; ~ ~ ' ~ - 1 y~-~ ~ ~ -~c; ~ ~ ' ~ y ~
~ I ' I ~ _ . ~ - ~ i _ + ~a~ o~- " ~ ~ i . ~ 1 - - - • ~ ~ ' - F-~-~ ~f'~,~ . .:1~i?~s cr _ _ - ~ ~ ' I ~ - ~ , -J ~ . ~ ~,~,.._..e.~ ~ ~'s9[~aley ~ ~ I - fir~~yl a
~ ~ 4 _ ~ey ~;~1 „fr L ~v' ~ ~ u~ I~~f~~~ ~ Ri~~ ~ a .~i'~
~1~~' 0~ ~ ~ eiyu - ~ ° , @ I ~i Y I _ ~
5 U~ial]e _ ~ ~ i ~ 1 Z4~ f ~t, ~ - J ~ ~ I ~ ~ i~lu~ ~l»~ 7 ~ 5~ ! ' -__~/,1- ~ ~~r p u, t,_ , . .i ~ ' 7 ~1., lA~ C~ Y ~ l. I
Le en~ ~ ~ ~ I _ h~~nu_ ~ ~ , -r -~.f~,+~' 1 ~
~ -~I ~ ~~i~ ~ ~ ,~1~'~' ~d1~ . i ~ . - . . r. - ~ ' ' {~x i ~I I..aw ~ensi Rcsldcntt~l ~ ~ n,
i ' ~ t ~,~i, ,~ri ,~t~?y ~ ~ - ~ . , , i a 1~ , - , q ~ 1 , _ . ' ~ . _ . . ~ a~ I L ~ .4i~ ,+i -~fik~Y::'ke . d I ~ }~F, ~ r . . _ , . ~ a - M~~~= 3' okarr~ Rrr~r _ ' • • , - , ..rTi F , ~ ' fL l~~~iu~ I~€~Yty Resis~e~tl~
1 . } ~ . ~ ~ , ~ - ~ir U(1 L ~ ~y ~ ~ o :~"I~all o _ s~ - ' - '~u nct i , ~a4s J - - - L' i 1 1 ' ~ uckrv ~~r t ~ , ° i~ ; ' . z I_i I' Ir i, - g~: ti~K ract ~ ~ ~ _~r t ~ ~ I . , _ ~ . ~ . . ~ial
r ' ~ I , ~~LCi17fC I. - ` 1 ~ -y : , ~ I uist ~ ~ ~Et13 ~CSI{~CIItI~ ~ ~~5" ~ 1~" ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ j ~ ~ , t .
a, ~ ; . i • _ ~ ~ h~', ya ~ Car~isT r+ j'; ~ j~~: ~'j~ ~S ~ ~ ~ i. t mny ~ .
~ ~ , ~ ! ' - I I e ~ ~k A d -,~h,~'~' ~ ~ ]~1)C 3+~ ~ . ~ . , ~ ~r~ ~t ~ Mw, ~ ~,rt2 ~ ~ ~ - _ ~ ~f . I ~ ' t ~ i ! 4 ~~"'~:~4 . , t S}~ . ~ ~ 4 ~ r-~° ~ \ ~ . ~ - „ri. ~ - _ li~~rei~; ~ I. ~ - , ~~~r 1~_:,. _ ...:.y ' ~ ~ I-- 7~ M . _ aa ~ ~ ° f . _ -~i i~Knt ~ - I ~►w " ` ~.Ofi'1[~OP ~i7tE{~, US~
sa..t` ~ ~ , . ~ _ I „ , . ~ ~ ,w.~ .~JI~ , ' c~^- ~ 1~'~~ ~r4 r ; j, , _ "~~~,r.~ ~ - '„r I$S~ ~.4 ~'ti. ~ ~w . ~I ~ . I . ~ ' , 1 ~jr~ y~ '~M_ ~ iv *
~ , r •~a~=ra ~ ti , r;:r ~ f. ~ ~ ~ _ , , , I . ~ ~ ~ ~ . -~y,~i , ,s~-, . ~ , . .4-~ .f._, , - ~ ~ . t , ~ - - (}f~ce . , i J , . ~ " CP►4~~ '9 ~ # ; y _ ~I ' , .
_ _ ~ ~ . r. . ~ _ - - i _ I~ - - ~ '~l~e~'~1 ~ i i _ . ~ _ ~;ao ~r~ _ ~ ~ ~ i~ - - ~ lr,u i ~tiliar, '~s" ~r y°'` j . r ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I--_,~ i y ~d ` ~Ct1t~1' L[} ~ ~~G[~l!lI1C~~ ,a t• ►incd) i
~~ytt ` r"~ 'ih6: ~3~3CS~. C~c I ~ I i..1{i~~ ~ ~ ~ + _ ~k e:~mel K ° . d i~•~~;^~ r I ~ 4 . . F.: . ; . ~ 1 ,~i _ ; . . . . i. ~ ' ~t~n `s _ t r ~ 4 ,r 1 ~_u~ ir a ats ns ! r~ulda ~ y~;~ . ~,r ~ ,el ~„'4 mE~ ~ ~ _ ~ p1,1~1~1G~~1iS51'~tJ~~l~
r . , , ~ _ p ~ , . r~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~f' ' y ~ E~~n ` 1 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ , ,I - ':1~ ir , ~ r - I .I } _ ~ i . ~ y ~~i - a . 1'ts ' ~ , .
~ Y , ~~1 ~ _ _ ' ! ti, _ v I ~ ~ T~t _ . _ ; ~ ~ ~ " ~ - = _ _ ~ ~ , ~ - , , . i' , ' T _ 1'+iei ~rhoad ~ornm~rcial I • ~ , ~ I~ ~ ~s - ~ J ti - ~ ~ ~ ~ tz~ba~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ _ ,n~~.~; , -r~ ia1
~4~ ~l va- . i ~'rl ~,v:3 L ~ _ - - ~ F . I Y ~1c . _ , I ~ ~ , n - ~ I ~ l ~ ~ - . i ~ - . ~ ~ p~~~ ~ ' II ' ~ ' s , r, r "1 ~1~iis .I s e _ ~`rp~_'~°~~- F [~.(1[IIIII~III ' ~d~llII1~GCClt'~ argn ~ ~ I 1~: ~ .,Is~~,I. ~.5~^ Ax:, ~r ~ti !
~ . i , t v ,n ~ _ _ . , ~ ~ , d , a ~ ~ ~ _ _ _ _ . i ~ . ; . . - , . .4 . - .a . , , 4 - - ~ e - - ~ ~ ~ . ~ e - , ~
. o' - - ; - . , . Y ; . Rc 'oma] Commseci~i . , ~ _ `"4 - _ . : ° - i y ~ltu~ €s' ~ Y' ~ ~ ,~.L _ ~ G~ ~ r ~ - i~ ~ . a, • _ _ ~ f ~ ~ - . - , , ~ . - ~ . ~ . ~,k ~ i ' . ; ~ ~ , ~ .
. , . , _ -~,'i~- q~ F,'"~' _ ~ ` ~:r` ~i.~ ~ i- - ~ - ti I - A - , ° ~ , - Sltelf 4ih , ~ '~'S`-~.?!,~JY9 ~c - ~ . » ~%r9Y~i ~ r, I ' C~~ .41 f ~ 'f gj r, ~ ~1~~ ~ ~~~17~ , _ , _ , , - ~ . . s~ I ~ i, , ,
.I ~ ~ - ~ ' ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ' ~ ~ , ~ ~,~,.bu7 h~ ~ ~ lAkt ~rh ~th ' ~ . t• ~ ' ~s - z` 1~ i ~ F ~ _ , ' ~1, ~ ~i ' ~ ~ Bth ~ C~ 1 + r' - _ ~ i - 4 w . ~ Gth ' ~t~ ~ ~ " ~I1{~115~T1d~
~ ~ ~ ` y~= ; ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ , I ~ HcaY} ~ 11 1~=4R g f ~ ~ ~ do 9~ 4~Ila n ~i+ ' ~ ~j t _ 1 4tE'- i ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~...~I~,~~, r •w I r _ {~P~k-~i1-45,. ~
~ . - ~ ~ ~ ' r ~ a~.~,.4r` ~ ~ , ~ ! ~ et~ r l~, , _ ~ 11 ~ n~ P~r~[I`Qp~S~ra~c . . , ; _ . o 1J ~ a ~~h ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i~ _ f 2~
1~' - ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ e ~F°'- ~ lati I _ I ~ .3 c~~ ~ ~ ~d ~ ~ ` ~C .~1 ~ ~ ~ , - ' ~ ~ ~ . s ~ ~ ~ M W Clthcr Mu~acipalit~es
~ ~ ~ - _ 1- I i ~ v i ~ i 1 ~ ! ~ ' _ ~ ~ ' ~ - 38Ch r~ ~ ~ ~ $ ° M l , t~~i ~ ~ j ~ ~ p~
~ : ~ € ~7~ of S kane V~ll . I t~ 4 1., u '~Y I {1 ~ TF F a.~ M1 1 'I ~ ~f 'I , ~ -1~. ~ 1 _ ~ ~ ~ l ! t - ~ t ~ - ~ i _ ~ r a ~ I
. , . r, ~ r ~ C~ ~ ~ : ~ ' ~ d ~ • ~ i 1 I ~fbSI1 ~Tf~J~V'Ctl I~TC~ ~ ~ ~ , , , f r ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ i Y - 1 •y 30 _ _ ~
~st ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~9 t . t r 1 - ~ , ~ ~ i ~ , - 7 { Watcr B ~cs . '1 . ~ ~ $il I h1~~-~ ~ ' i ,a.. . 111~.'~ - ~ I
~ ~ ' ~ v k . 1 ~ ~ a i e 5 ~ ~ ~ t~ I~rk ~ ~ ~ $
~ 5 " • ry ~ 'Hth , d~' [ ` ' ~ ~ ~U~~1{ v ~ ~ 1 Y ~ _ ~Tth ~ a,~ ~ ~ _ ~i I 12ni1 _ _ ~ _ _ ~ Map Location ~
~$11r _ ~ ~ _ t ~ _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ r~ ~ » e - - I~ 3~l. 4~ ~I ~ i I ~ ~ ~
1 ~ 1 ~s~ ~ . n,. ~9~uE ~ ' ~ ~ _ 3tdh - t i ~ ~ ~ ; ~ _ u ~ r . ~1~ }F~ ~ + ~t E
~ ~ ~ ~ I l 7 r _ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3~ s
~ 35 ~ ~ f , - itiM 31 r 4 D~tte:1~8l30~9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ IE , ~ ~r ttie Tar~e i ~ p ~ Q
1 ~ 1 0 ,au ~ ~ i { ~ +li , ~ ~ ► ~ M
j ~ ~I 1 ~ ~CO~] r k ~ A ~ ~ ~F e ~ bttl7 ~ 1 ~ ~-r ~~I ~ . Y • ~
~ I ~ - i - - ~ . ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ' P i
u~n n t I ~ I r ~ Sa'°~u ~ ~ 3~Rlh 7sh ~ 2 MEICS
- ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ f ~4 ~O.S 1 21 1 I c~ ~ ~ ~ F__ ~ I ~r i ~ ~ M ' ~ + ' o ~ I ,q ~ ~ ~ ~ f
r_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,n ~ ( ` G3 I ~ ' ~ 14'ottee: 71~e t or~c~~ort ~hr~ti►att ~sn thls tru~p [s ~t~~pl1ed fr 37 c~ ~ ~S ap ts com,ptledfivrn v0,1014s
~ t or C . ~ - . ~ ~ r'~ ' Ofi U I ~ s~,rrcts rrrad tr aubj~er 1o co~asslc~tl rt~isron Th~ ~rry r►kz~t ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~f ut r!~ pccura ~ or t`~'~~ iJtt~ n: The Ciry rnakes rro clairns
. 3~ ~ ar g~rarma~ees' ~u c} . ~y ~ ~ v~44~ R,~ i a`' M~~ I ~ rca,cf a~'scl~rn~ li~rbrlr ~ or err~or,~ ~c1 ~t~r`s.~~are,~ i~s ft~ en~~ of tJaLi mW a►?d rf crmr`ssrans rn its Gntt#errds.
. i r~ , F ~ Y , + t I ~ " To ~on rrm ~ ta~rt~cr t~~e Ct o S,~r~ ~ allc ~ ~ I I , , . :I Ps ~ ~ • ~ `r ~ 1 £}~1npr~cr~D~prn't~~[, I~lY13~4~a~fPlu,r~rnp: ~`3(~J) 9~, )vkcrrre VclJcv. Commuw,ty
, ~ ~ ~ , r Y ~ ~ ~ 1 e a, ~ ~ e! i m e n l E I R` ~ ~r ~ ~v 1 ~ ~ y w T _ n, Q - _ - _ - ~ - r - Arad~c~ ~f ~►e Clty of ~okinc ~.~l~r, Cuen~unln~ Ilcv ~ p ,11vairg: (509) 921-1000, aICaP I1vvt3opnteni IleliarlrnenF
~ . ~ r . ~ r~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - ° - ~ _ . ~ - i!
~ i~■~
Cobuw[nvrrY DEVEt,oPMErrr DEPARTMErrr
PI.~►xfi'IlVG DI~'islolv
STAFF REPORT AND RECOI~~NDATION TO THE
I
%11ey PLANNING COMMISSION
~
COMPREHENSIYE PI.AN TEXT AMENDMENTS:
CHAPTER 2 - LAND USE
' CHAPTER 3 - TRANSPOR'TATION
C'AAPTER 4- CAPITAL FACILITIES AND PUBLIC SERVICES
CHAPTER 8 - NATURAL En'VIRONMENT ~
~
STAFF REPORT DA'rE: MarCh 5, 2009
HEARIrG DATE AN-D LOCATION: March 12, 2009, begirming at 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley City Hall Council
Chambers, Valley Redwood Plaza Building, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 101, Spokane Valley, Washington
99206.
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: The following amendments are being recommended:
CITY IIvITIATED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENTS
~ File Number ~ Map or Text ~ Summary of Amendment
CPA-05-09 Text Chapter 2- Land Use: Update Table 2.1 with new land quantity analysis
Map 2.1 information; Update/add aanexation goals, policies and text. Re-evaluate
all properties designated public/quasi-public and adjust as a ro riate;
CPA-06-09 Map 3.2 Chapter 3- Transportation: Add new bike lanes that are complete or will
be by the end of the construction season:
- Montgomery from Woodruffto University
- Wellesley from Evergreen to Progress
- Mansfield from Montgomery to SR 27
CPA-07-09 Text Chapter 4- Capital Facilities and Public Services: Update 6-year TIP;
Map 4.1 update Water Districts & Wellheads map; update Parks & Recreation
Map 4.3 map; update b-year Sewer map; add annexation area level of service
Map 4.5 lan ug,a e;
CPA-08-09 Map 8.1 Chapter 8- Natural Enviranment: update Wetlands map; update Fish &
Map 8.3 Wildlife Habitat map.
This proposal is considered a non-project action under RCW 43.21C.
PROPOSAi. LoCATIO.N: The proposal affects Uie entire City of Spokane Valley, Washington.
APPLICAN7': Ciry of Spokane Valley, WA
APPROV AL CRITERIA: Title 17 (General Provisions) and Tide 21 (Environmental Controls) of the Spokane Valley
Municipal Code (SVMC).
SUMMARY OF RECOMMEh'DATION: The Planning I?ivision recommends that the Planning Commission approve the
proposed text amendments to the adopted Comprehensive Plan.
STAFF PLkNNTR: Mike Basinger, AICP, Senior Planner, Community Development Department
ATTACILMENTS:
Exhibit 1: Chapter 2- Land Use
Staff Repoct and Recammendation to the Plenning Commission
Page l of 4
_ ~
Exhibit 2: Chapter 3- Transportation
Exhibit 3: Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Exhibit 4: Chapter 8- Natural Environment
Exhibit S: SEPA Determination
Exhibit 6: Agency Comments
Exhibit 7: Public Comments
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. APPLICATION PROCESSING
Chapter 17.80 Permit Processing Procedures in the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). The following
summarizes key application procedures for the proposal.
Application Submitted: I November 1, 2008
Determination of Completeness: ~ November 1, 2008
lssuance of Determinadon of Non-Sioficance (DNS): ~ December 19, 2008
End of Appeal Period for DNS: ~ January 6, 2009
Date of Published Notice of Public Hearing: February 24, 2009
Date of Mailed Notice of Public Hearing: February 20, 2009
B. SU':1B1AR1' OF TEkT ANIENT?~iENTS
II. FINUINGS AND CONCLtiSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA
Fiodings:
Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Contruls) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC), the lead agency has
determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). The Planning Division issued
a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) for the proposal. This decision was made after review of a completed
environmental checkli5t and other information on file with the lead agency.
Conclusion(s):
The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act and Title 21 of the SVMC have been fulfilled by
the applicant's submittal of the required SEPA Checklist, and the issuance of the City's threshold determination
consisting of a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). No appeals were received.
III. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIOtiS SPECIFIC TO THE COiNIPREHENSNE PLAN AMENDMENTS
A. CO~tPLIA\CE N1'ITH TITLE 17 (GE1ERaL PROVZSIO~TS) OF TIIE SPOkA~1E VAI,LEI' Mt~7CIPAL CODF.
Findings:
Section 17.80.140(H) of the SVMC provides approval criteria that must be considered when the City amends the
Comprehensive Plan. The criteria are listed below along with staff comments.
l. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and
protection of the environment;
Staff Resaonse: The Washington State Growth Management Act limits the City to amending the
Comprehensive Plan only once a year. The City provides a process each year for individuals, groups, City ,
departments, and elected officials to propose updates to address changing conditions so the plan will reflect
ongoing work or new information. The proposed text amendments add or modify policy direction in
Staff Report and RccoRUnendatian to ihe Planning Commission
F'age 2 of 4
~
specii►c policy areas and update intormacion in tiie pian. 't li~ ~UUy pI'OpOsc:d i.e?it 3I11eI1(iIileilts are minur W,
nature and ensure that the Comprehensive Plan is consisteat with other intemal plans within the City. Th~
public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment is furchered by ensuring th~
Comprehensive Plan is reflective of regional policy and current with othtr internal plans.
2. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion
of the City's adopted plan not affected by tbe amendment;
Staff Response: The pmposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are not in conflict with Chapter
36.70A RCW (Growth Management Act) and do not result in interna] inconsistencies within the plan itself. ~
3. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's
control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies;
Staff Response: The proposed text amendments are not site or property specific. This approval criterion
does not apply.
4. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error,
Staff Response: The proposed teact amendments will not result in changes to specific properties.
5. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan.;
Staff Re§ponse; The majority of the proposed text amendments either update or correct inforcnation
contained in the plan. Adding annexation goals, policies, and text will address a deficiency in the
Comprehensive Plan.
Section 17.80.140(H) of the SVMC provides the following factors that mu.st be considered when the City amends the
Comprehensive Plao. The factors are listed below along with staff comments.
l. The effect of the physical environment;
Staff Re5ponse: Pu.rsuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of tUe City of Spokane Valley Municipal
Code, the lead agency has determined that the proposed text amendmenis do not have a probable significant
adverse impact on the environment.
2. The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes;
Staff' ResQonse: Proposed amendments CPA-06-09 through CPA-08-09 are policy oriented and non-project
amendments. Proposed amendment CPA-05-09 concerns many parcels located throughout the City of
Spokane Valley; consideration will be on an area-wide basis.
3. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods;
Staff Re§ponse: Proposed amendments CPA-06-09 through CPA-08-09 are policy oriented and non-project
amendmenu. Proposed amendment CPA-05-09 concerns many parcels located throughout the City of
Spokane Valley; consideradon will be on an area-wide basis.
4. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks,
recreation, and schoois;
Staff Response: The City of Spokane Valley addresses adequacy of community facilities on a citywide
basis thcough capital facilides planning. The Comprehensive Plan recommends a concurrency management
system for transportation, sewer, and water facilities. The Parks and Recreatioa Plan outlines an
Staff Report and Recommendation to the Ptanning Commissioa
Page 3 of 4
implementation strategy including a capital facilities plan, which identifies costs and revenue sources for
new parks. CPA-05-09 will designate school properties with an appropriate land use designation allowing
more certainty in regards to use and value if a school decides to sell their property.
5. The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region;
Staff Response: The proposed text amendments add or modify policy direction in specific policy areas and
update information in the plan to ensure consistency with other intemal plans within the City. The public
benefit will be furthered by ensuring the Comprehensive Plan is reflective of regional policy, and current
with other internal plans.
6. The yuantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and derisity and the demand for
such land;
Staff Resnonse: Proposed amendments CPA-06-09 through CPA-08-09 are policy oriented and non-project
amendments. Proposed amendment CPA-05-09 concerns many parcels located throughout the City of
Spokane Valley; consideration will be on an area-wide basis.
7. The current and projected population density in the area; and
Staff Resaonse: Proposed ameadments CPA-06-09 through CPA-08-09 are policy oriented and non-project
amendments. Proposed amendment CPA-05-49 concerns many parceis located ihroughout the City of
Spokane Valley; consideration will be on an area-wide basis. The proposed amendments do not demand
population analysis.
8. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan.
Staff Analvsis: The proposed amendments are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will have
minimal unpact on other aspects of the plan.
Conclusion(s):
The proposed Comprehensive Plan text amendments are consistent with the approval criteria and factors contained in
the SVMC.
IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATIO`'
The Planning Division after review and consideration of the proposed amendments and applicable approval criteria
and factors recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of CPA-05-09 through CPA-08-09.
Staff Report and Recommendatian to the Planning Cotmnission
Pagc 4 of 4
1 ~
CONLNiLTiITv DEYELOPNiLNT DEPAItTA1E,tiT
PWx:vnvc Dtvislorr
STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMT1vDATION TO TSE ~
~
PLANNING COMMISSION
~
CPA-O1-09
STAFF REPORT DATE: MarCh 5, 240
HEARING DA'rE 'D LoCATIO`: March 12, 2009, beginning at 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley City Hall Council
Chambers, Valley Redwood Plaza Building, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 101, Spokane Valley, Washington
99206.
PROPOSAI. DESCtuPTION: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment to change the designation on parcels 45242.9032,
45242.9033, 45242.9035, 45242.9036, 45242.9050, 45242.9051, 45242.9056 and 45242.9057 from Low Density
Residential to High Density Residendal with a corresponding zoning change from Single-family Residential District (R-
3) to Multi-family High Density Residential Ilistrict (NIF-2). 'I'his proposal is cansidered a non-project action under
RCW 43.21 C.
PROPOSAI. LoCATIOV: Parcels 45242.9032, 45242.9033, 45242.9035, 45242.9036, 45242.9050, 45242.9051,
45242.9056 and 45242.9057; located on the south side of 4dAvenue between Sullivan Road and Conklin Road; further
locaied in the south ha.if of the oorthwest quarter of Section 24, Tov+mship 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette
Meridian, Spokane County, Washington.
O«'NER/APPLICAN"T:
Marie Olbricht; 15710 F.ast 4`h Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 99037
Brook and .lody Kamp; 12110 East 10`' Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Joy Swenson; 15808 East 4`h Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 99037
Deanis Crapo; 15321 East Mission Avenue; Spokane Va11ey, WA 99037
Christine Kimball; 15714 East 4`h Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 99037
APPLICANTS REPRESENTATIVE: Ben Goodmaclsen, Whipple Consulting Engineers
APPROVAL CRITERIA: Chapter 2(Urban Land Use) of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Tide 17 (General
Provision), Title 19 (Zoning Regulations), and Title 21(Environmental Controls) of the Spokane Valley Municipa!
Code (SVMC).
SUm2►tAti' OF RECOM11iFNDATION: The Planning Division, after review and consideration of th,- , thri? i:d a,nr! i cat io:
'pPT'tiNt' f P'~-(11_-1)..
S iA~
REVIEtivED B1': Gre
ATTACHMEN"TS:
Exhibit 1: Comprehensive Plan Map
Exhibit 2 Zoning Map
Exhibit 3: 2007 Aerial Map
Exhibit 4: Vicinity Map
Exhibit 5: Transportation Map
Exhibit6: ApplicationSubmitt:'
Exhibit 7: SEPA Determinati,.
r`;~11~~ .~r.zr, ~-i»1j_r11S-a2i ftcpor, a:d kecommendatiun to the P~.. .
Pagc 1 0 ` c-
I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
APPLICATION PROCESSI!11G: Chapter 17.80 Permit Processing Procedures in the Spokane Valley Municipal Code
(SVMC). The following summarizes key application procedures for the proposal.
Pre-Application Meeting: ~ October 3, 2008
Application Submitted: ~ November 3, 2008
Determination of Completeness: ~ November 10, 2008
Issuance of Determination of Non-Sipificance (DNS): ~ December 22, 2008
End of Appeal Period for DNS: ~ January 6, 2009
Date of Published Notice of Public Hearing: February 6, 2009
Date of Mailed Notice of Public Hearing: February 6, 2009
PROPER?i' LNFORhiATION:
Size and Characteristics: The site is approximately 11.19 acres in size. The SEPA checklist states the
site is flat with a va.rying slope of 2 to 5 percent.
Compreheasive Plan: Low Density Residential
Zoning: Single Family Residential District (R-3)
Existing Land Use: There are six (6) residences and several detached structures located in the
proposed proiect area. ,
SLTRROUNDING COAIPREHErSIVE PLA., ZOr'ING, A.'D LAN-D USES:
North Comprehensive Plan - High Density Residential and Neighborhood Commercial
Zoning - Multifamily High Density Residential (MF-2) and Neighborhood Commercial
Existing Land Uses - Single-family residences, apartments, retail and office uses
South Comprehensive Plan - Public/Quasi-Public
Zoning - Community Facilities (CF)
Existing Land Uses - Central Valley High School
East Gomprehensive Plan - Low Density Residential
Zoning - Single Family Residential District (R-3)
Existing Land Uses - Single-family residences
West Comprehensive Plan - High Density Residential and Neigh6orhood Commercial I
Zoning - Multifamily High Density Residential (MF-2) and Neighborhood Commercia]
Existing Land Uses - Apartments and gas station ,
II. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA
Findings:
Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC), the lead agency has
determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). The Planning Division issued
a Determinadon of Non-Significance (DNS) for the proposal. This decision was made after review of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
Conclusion(s):
The procedural requirements of the Staie Envuonmental Policy Act and Title 21 of the SVMC have been fulfilled by
the applicant's submittal of the required SEPA Checklist, and the issuance of the City's threshold determination
consisting of a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). No appeals were received.
Staff Report and Recommrndation to the Plarming Camruission for CPA-0 1-09
Page 2 of 6
III. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
A. C0:1IPL1.4tiCE R'ITH TITLE 17 (GE\ERAL PR0N75IONS) OF THE SPOKA:E VALLEY MIItiIC[PAL CODE
Findings:
Section 17.80.140 H. (Comprehensive Plan Ameadment Approval CriteriaL,pokane Valley Municipal Code
1. The City may approve Comprehensive Plan amendments and area-wide zonc map amend.anents if it finds that
(analysis is italicized):
a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and
protection of the environment;
StafF Comment: The City's adopted policies of the Comprehensive Plah state in part "the economic
development straleo► is to promote a more diverse eco»omy jthatJ would achieve a better bcrlonce
behveen jobs, housing and support the City's desired quality of life" (Section 2.3.1). The proposed
amendment offers additional opportunitres to achieve the balance by expanding the larrd use availoble
for further diverse development. This proposal supports the safety, health and welfare of the
community by clustering higher residential densities next to services such as public trrnuportation,
school, medical/professional o,,~`'rces and retail services. The public health, safety, and general welfare
tivill be promoted in accordance with slandards established by tlre state and the Ciry of Spokane
I'alley's regulations.
b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the
portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment;
Staff Comcnent: The state-wide planning goals and policies provide the basis for the City's
Con:prehensive Plan and guidance in the development of goals and policies.
State-Wide Planni»g Goals:
Govl 1: Urbcm Growth. Encourage development in urba» areas where adequate public facilities
and services exist or ca» be provided in an efficient manner.
Goa14: Housing. Encourage the availability of affordable hosing to all economic segments of the
population of this sate, promote a variety of resrde»tial de»siNes and housing types, and encourage
preservation of existing housing stock.
Approval of the requested comprehensive pla» amendi»enl would meet both state-wide plcm»ing goals
cited ubove. The proposed locatio» is served by all »ecessary urban services and provides for
appropriate i»;fill development with !he City of Spokane Valley. The City has adopted development
regulations that are desig»ed to address specific impacts relcrted to new developrnent such as off-street
parking, landscapin& lighting, setbacks and height. The proposed amendment is consistent with the
Growth Management Act. Adjacent land use designations are consistent wilh [he proposed
an:endment.
c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's
control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies;
Staff Comment: The proposed amendmerrt does not respond to a substantial change in conditions.
d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error, or
Staff Comment: The proposed amendment does not correct a mapping error.
e. The proposed amendrnent addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan.
Staff Rsport and Rccommendation to the Planning CoRnmissian foc CPA-0 1-09
Page 3 of 6
~
Staff Comment: The proposed amendmetit does not address cm identifted deficiency in the
Comprehensive Plan.
2. The City must also consider the following factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan amendments:
a. The effect upon the physical environmeat;
Staff Comment: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the Ciry of Spokane Yalley Uniform
Development Code, the lead agency has deter,nined that this proposal does not have a probable
significarrt adverse impacl on the environment. The comprehensive plrm amendment is a non project
action under SEPA. A1 the time of the submittcrl of lhe buildrng permit application, an additional SEPA
review would likely be required to evaluate the impacts of the use(s) and proposed structure(s) o» the
physical environment.
b. The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes; ,
Staff Comment: The SEPA checklist states that there is no surface water body on or in the immediate
vicinity of site.
c. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods;
Staff Comment:The proposed amendment is contiguous to a High Density Residential Comprehensive
Plan designation. At the time of development, standnrds in Title 22 (Design and Developfitent
Standcrrds), specifrcally 22.70 (Fencing, Screening, und Landscaping) will reduce impacts on adjacent
low density residenNal designated properties by providing visual separation cmd physical buffers
hehveen land uses.
d. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation,
parks, recreation, and schools;
Staff Comment: The City of Spokane Yalley addresses adequacy of community facilities on a citywide
basis through capital facilities plcmning. Policy CFP-9.1 of the Comprehensive Plan recommerrds a
concurrency managemeni system for transporlation, sewer, and water facilities. The City of Spokcme
valley's Parks and Recreatiorr Plcm outlines an implementation strategy including a capital facilities
plan, which iderrtifies costs and revenue sources for new parks. At the tirne of developmenl, the
proposed amendmenl may have an impact on transporlation and schools. The potential build ou1 of
lhe proposed amendment would be 243 dwelling urrits. At the time of the submittal of the building
permit application, vn additional SEPA review would likely be required to evaluate the impacts of the
use(s) a»d proposed structure(s) on the physical enviro»meni in regards to transportation and schools.
e. The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region;
Staff Comment: The proposal would be consistent with the existing character of the neighborhood.
The parcels proposed to change are in a neighborhood that has existing mulhfamily on three (3) sides.
This is an appropriate location to allow for infill development that can uJilrze services such as
alternative trcrosportation methods (public transportation) provide an opportunity to live and work in a
close proximity and !he beneficial lacation of comnrercial, retail and ofJ`'rce uses to serve potential
residerrts.
f. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand
for such larid;
Staff Comment: The proposed amendment is approximately 11.17 ocres in size and has the potential of
243 dwelling units. The potential demand for high densiry development rs unkrrown.
g. The curreat and projected population density in the area; a.ad
Staff Comment: With the current zoning of R-3 the potential btrilt-out is sixty fow (64) units compared
to a buflt-out ofpotentia124.3 units if the designation is charrged to high denstry residential (HDR). The
Scaff Report and Recommendaiion to the Planning Commission far CPA-01-09
Pagc 4 ot'6
proposed comprehensive plcm amendment will potentiolly increase the population density. The
proposed comprehensive plan amendment does not demrnid population analvsis.
h. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan.
Staff Comment: The proposal is in close proximity to services thctt would be benefcial to multifamrly
development. Including, but not lirriited to the proximity to Central Yalley High School and
recreational opportunities, public transportvtion travels along 4'hAvenue in front ofproposed parcels
that would proti•ide alternative transportation benefzts to potential residences us well as contribule to
the irrvestment in public trcntsportatron. The proposed comprehensive plan amendment is consistent
tivith the comprehen.sive plan and will have minirrial ir»pact on other ospects of the plan.
B. COMPLL,t1TCE WTTH TTTLE 19 (ZOMNG REGULATIONS) OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MiJNICLPAL CODE
Findings:
Section 19.40.080 (Multifamilv HiRh Densitv Residential District) Spokane Vallev Municipal Code
The Comprehensive Plan Map Amend.ment is from Low Densiry Residential to High Density Residential and
corresponding zoning map amendment from Single-family Residential District (R-3) to Multifamily High Density
Residentia] District (MF-2).
The High Density Residential designation is intended to provide a range of housing types to accommodate anticipated
residential gtowth with densities not to exceed twenty-two (22) units per acre. Multifamily residential zones should
be used as transidonal zoning between higher intensity land uses, such as commercial and office, to rnedium and
lower density single-family neighborhoods. High density residential areas should be located near services and high
capacity transit facilities or transit routes.
Conclusion(s):
The proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment is contiguous to other multi-family developments. The 11.17 acres in
size encompasses eight (8) parcels allowing the opportunity for flexible development in housing types ranging from
single-family residences, clustered housing, duplexesT townhouses and/or apartments each with a minunum size 2,000
square feet per dwelling unit. CPA-01-09 is consistent with the intention of the High Density Residendal designation.
C. CoAiPREHENSIVE PI.AN
The Comprehensive plan states that the High Density Residential designation provides housing opportunities for
younger, lower income households in the City who may not yet be able to afford a home of their own. Additionally,
the designation provides housing options for people looking to "downsize" from a singe-family dwelling on an
individual lot, or for those know as "empty nesters" whose children have moved out of the household and a large
home is no longer needed. The plan further states, the designation is appropriate for land which is located adjacent to
the arterial street system served by public transit, and is in close proximity to business and commercial centers. Staff
analysis is italicized.
1. LUG-1 of the Comprehensive Plan recommends preserving and protecting the character of Spokane Valley's
residential neighborhoods.
Staff Comment: The High Density Residential designQtion is consistent with the surrounding neighborhood.
Tlrere is public transportation roule along 4'hA ve»ue adjacent to the proposed amendment. Addrtionally, the site
is in close proximity to business and commercial centers. At 1he time of development, standards in Title 22
(Design and Development Sta»dards), speciftcally 21.70 (Fenci»g, Screening, and Landscuping) will reduce
impocts on adjocent low density residential desigrtated properties by providrng vfsual separation and physicul
buffers bet►veen land tcses.
Staff Rcpor and Recommendation to the Plaining Commission for CPA-0 1-09
Pagc 5 of 6
.
2. LUP-1.3 of the Comprehensive Plan encourages review and revisions as necessary for existing land use
regulations to provide for innovation and flexibility in the design of new residential developments, accessory
dwelling units and in-fill development.
Staff Comment: The High Density Residenticrl designation will allowflexibilrty in development with the option of
cfif~erent housing types from single family residential, clustered housing, diplexes, townhouses and/or apartments.
The proposed amendment is 11.17 acres in size and enconzpasses eight (8) parcels allowing for thellexibility in-
fill devel opment.
D. PCTALIC FACILITIES
Findings:
The property is currently served with public water and sewer. Access is provided from 4* Avenue designated a
Collector in the Arterial Street Plan (Exhibit 5).
E. FIt~'DMG Ar'D CO\CLtiSIONS SPECiFIC TO PIJBLIC COMtiiFNI'S
Findings:
Staff has received no public comment concecning the proposal to date.
Conclusion(s):
Adequate public noticing was conducted for CPA-0 1 -09 in accordance with adopted public noticing procedures.
F. FiNnnvc AN-n Con'CLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO AGENCY COMMENTS
Findings:
Agency comments relate to the physical development of the property. These comments will Ue addressed at the time
of development. Comments are attached as exhibits to the staff report.
Conclusion(s):
Staff has reviewed comments and no concerns are noted.
IV. OVERALL COIVCLUSION
The proposed Comprehensive Plan dzsignation to High Density Residential and change in zoning classification to MF-2
is consistent with the Comprehensive Plans policies and Eoals.
V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Division after review and consideration of the submitted application and applicable approval criteria
recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of CPA-01-09.
Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-01-09
Page 6 of 6
Cowmunm' DEYELOPb1ElrT DEPARTMEN? Pi.Arnvnvc DrvSiox
~ wall~ STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE
PO
' %Hey PLANNING COMMISSION
49;000
CPA-02-09
i ■
STw~ R~ORT DA'tE: MarGb 5, 2009
HEARIti'G DATE AND LOCATION: March 12, 2009, beginning at 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley City Hall Council
Chambers, Valley Redwood Plaza Building, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 101, Spokane Valley, Washington
99206.
PttoposAL DESCiup'I'TOti: City initiated site specific Comprehensive Plan map amendment on parcels 45242.1002
and 45242.1006 from High Density Residential (HDR) to Neighborhood Commercial (NC). This proposal is considered a
non-project action under RCW 43.21C.
PROPOSAL LOCATION: The proposed site is located on the northeast corner of 4t' Avenue and Sullivan Road,
parcels 45242.1002 and 45242.1006, addressed as 315 and 325 South Sullivan Road; further located in the NW
of the N`'V 1/4 of Section 24, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spukane Counn•. R'ashington.
OWmTRS:
Alvin & Eugewa Wolff; 1825 North Hutchinson Road; Spokane, WA 99212
Green Flash, LLC; 220 West Main Avenue; Spokane, WA 99201
APPROVAL CRITERIA: Chapter 2(Urban Land Use) of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Tide 17 (General
Provision), Title 19 (Zoning Regulations), and Title Z] (Environmental Controls) of the Spokane Valley Municipal
Code (SVMC).
SLTNLMARY OF RECOAfl1iENDATIO\: The Planning Division, after review and consideration of the subautted application
and applicable approval criteria, recommends that the Planning Commission approve CPA-02-09.
STAF'F PI.AN~'ER: Karen Kendall, Assistant Planner, Community Development Department
REV1E«'ED BY: Greg McCormick, AICP, Planning Manager, Couimunit}, Development Departmenc
ATTACHNU.NTS:
Exhibit 1: Comprehensive Plan Map
Exhibit 2 Zoning Map
Exhibit 3: 2007 Aerial Map
Exhibit 4: Vicinity Map
Exhibit S: Transportation Map
Exhibit 6: SEPA I3eterminadon
Exhibit 7: Agency Comments
Staff Rcport and RecommcndaUon to the Plaaning Comtnission for CPA-02-09
Page 1 of 6
I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
APPLICATION PROCESSING: Chapter 17.80 Permit Processing Procedures in the Spokane Valley Municipal Code
(SVMC). The following summarizes key applicadon procedures for the proposal.
Pre-Application Meeting: ~ n/a
Application Submitted: ~ n/a
Determinadon of Completeness: ~ n/a
Issuance of Determination of Non-Sioficance (DNS): ~ December 22, 2008
End of Appeal Period for DNS: ~ January 6, 2009
Date of Published Notice of Public Hearing: ~ February 20, 2009
Date of Mailed Notice of Public Hearing: ~ February 20, 2009 ,
PROPERTY LNTORNIA770N:
Size and Characteristics: The site is approximately 1.3 acres in size. The site is flat and fully developed with
paved parking and landscaping.
Comprehensive Plan: High Density Residential
Zoning: ~ Multifamily High Density Rcsidential District (MF-2)
Existing Land Use: The site is fully developed with two commercial multi-tenant buildings for
approximately three (3) tenants each. There currently is a bank with a drive-thru
operating in one of the tenant spaces.
SLiRROUNDING COINiI'REHENSIV'E PLAN, ZON-ING,,4ND LAND USES:
North Comprehensive Plan - High Density Resideatial Community Commercial and Public/Quasi-Public
Zoning - Multifamily High Density Residential (MF-2), Cocnmunity Commercial (CC) and
Community Facilities (CF)
Existing Land Uses - Apartments, retail aad office uses
South Comprehensive Plan - High Densiry Residential, Neighborhood Commercial and Public/Quasi-Public
Zoning - Multifamily High Densiry Residential (NIF-2), Neighborhood Commercial and
Community Facilities (CF)
ExistinR Land Uses - Gas Station, convenience store, apartments and Central Vallev High School
East Comprebensive Plan - Low Density Residential and High Density Residential
Zoning - Single Family Residential District (It-3) and Multifamily High Densiry Residential (MF-2)
Existing Land Uses - Apartments and single-family residencas
West Comprehensive Plan - Office, Medium Density Residential and Low Density Residential
Zoning - Office (O), Muldfamily Medium Density Residential (MF-1) and Single Family Residential
District (R-3)
Existing Land Uses - Medical and professional offices, apartments and single-family residences
U. FINDINGS Ah'D CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA
Findings:
Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of ihe Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC), the lead agency has
determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). The Planning Division issued
a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) for the proposal. This decision was made after review of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
Conclusion(s):
StafT Rcport and Recommendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-02-09
Page 2 of 6
.
The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act and Title 21 of the SVMC have been fulfilled by
the applicant's submittal of the required SEPA Checklist, and the issuance of the City's threshold determination
consisting of a Determination of Non-Significaace (DNS). No appeals were received.
M. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
A. CONiPLIANCE wITS TTTLE 17 (GENERAL PROVISIONS) OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MT3NICIPAL CODE
Findings:
Section 17.80.140 H. (Comvrehensive Plan Amendment Approval Criteria) Spokane Vallev Municioal Code
1. The City may approve Comprehensive Plan amendments and area-wide zone map amendments if it finds that
(analysis is italicized):
a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and
protection of the environment;
Staff Comment: ?'he City's adopted policies of Ihe Comprehensive Plan state in part "the economic
developme»t stra?egy is to promote a rriare diverse economy [1hat] would achieve a better balmice
between jobs, housing and support the City's desired quality of life" (Section 2.3.1). The proposed
amendment offers additional apportunitres to achieve the balance by expanding the land use available
for further diverse development. This proposal supports the safety, health and welfare of the
commuruty by clustering higher residential densities next to services such as public transportation,
school, medicaUprofessional o,,~`'ices and retoil services. The public health, safety, and general welfare
will be promoted in accordance with standards established by the state and the City of Spokane
Valley's regulatio»s.
b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the
portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment;
Staff Comment: The state-wide planning goals and policies provide the basis for the City's
Comprehensive Plan and guidance i» the developmeni of goals and policies. The proposed rnnendment
is generolly in conformance with applicable section of 36. 70A RCW. The proposed location is served
by all necessary urban services and is located on a major arterial as designated by the City of Spokane
Valley Street Classifrcation Map.
c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's
control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies;
Staff Comment: The proposed rnrrendn:ent does not respond to a substantiol charrge in conditions.
d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or
Staff Comment: The proposed amendmenl does not correct a mapping error. This is sorl of correcting a
mcrpping error in the original adoptio» of the City's Comp Plan, rsn't ft?
e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed amendment does not address an identified defrciency in the Comprehensive Plan.
2. The City must also consider the following factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan amendments:
a. The effect upon the physical environment;
Staff Comment: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Conlrols) of the City of Spokane Valley Unrform
Development Code, the lead agency has determfined that this proposal does not have a probable
significant adverse impact on the enviro»rnent. The proposed localion is fully developed and all
Staff Report and Recoaunendation bo the Planning Commission fa CPA-02-09
Page 3 of 6
A
elemenls of the physical environment were addressed prior to issuance of building permits for the two
(2) multi-occupcmcy buildings.
b. The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes;
Staff Comment: The SEPA checklist states that there is no surfoce waler body on or in the imrnediate
vicinity of sile.
c. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods;
Staff Comment: The proposed amendment is adjacent to a Neighborhood Commercial Comprehensive
Plan designation. The proposed amendmeni is surrounded to the north with retail, office uses and
apartments, a gas station and co»venience store to the south, east by apartment, and to the west across
Sullivan Road there are commercial and office uses, apartments and single family residences. The
SEPA checklist states the site was recently developed in co»formance with the Ciry's standrrrds
including landscaping.
d. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation,
parks, recreation, and schools;
Staff Comment: The City of Spokane Yalley addresses adequacy of communityfircilities on a citywide
basis through capital facilrties planning. Policy CFP-9.1 of the Comprehensive Plcm recommends a
concurrency mcmagement system for lransportation, sewer, and waler facilities. The City of Spokrme
Valley's Pcrrks and Recreation Plcm outlines an i»:pleme»tcrtion strategy i»cluding a ccrpital facilities
plan, which identifies costs and revenue sources for new parks. The proposed amendment will not have
an impact on schools considering the request is for a neighborhood commercial designation. Two (2)
multi-tenarrt 6uildings were recently constructed on the site. During the Ciry's review of the
commercial buildirig permit tr•nnsportation, it-ater and sewer concw•rericj, ticere uddressed.
e. The benefit to tile neighborliood, City, and region;
Staff Comment: The proposed amendmenl hrrs provided ihrough receprt developnrertl aneighborhood
commercial establishment for the surrounding neighborhood. These uses may include retail sales,
restaurant, medical a»d professional o, f~`'ice uses, financial institutions, design frrms, and legal services.
One tencmt space is currently occupied by a bank.
f. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and che demand
for such land;
Staff Comment: The proposed ame»dment is approximately 1.3 acres in size and has provided two (7)
multi-tencmt buildings for a total of six (6) tenant spaces avoilable for future retail, of~`'iee and/or
restaurarit uses. The potential demand for this type of developme»t is unknown.
g. The current and projected population density in the area; and
Staff Comment: The proposed amendment has decreased populaNon derrsity. The proposed amendment
does not demand population cmalysis.
b. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan.
Staff Comment: The proposed amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will have
minimal impact on other rrspects of the plcm.
B. COMPLIAti'CE WIT'H TITLE 19 (ZOYING REGULATI0NS) OF THE SPOKAN-E VALLEY MLTN-ICTPAL CODE
Flndings:
Section 19.60.040 (Neitahborhood Commercial District) Spokane Vallev Municipal Code
Staff Report and Rtcommcndation to the Planning CommLssian for CPA-02-09
Pagc 4 of 6
~
The Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment is from High Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial and
corresponding zoning map amendment from multifamily High Density Residential District (MF-2) to Neighborhood
Commercial (NC).
The Neighborhood Commercial designation is intended for sma11-scale neighborhoods serving retail and office uses.
Neighborhood business areas should not be larger than hwo (2) acres in size and shotild be located as business clusters
racher than arteriai strip commercial developments.
Conclusion(s):
The proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment is adjacent to other neighbor}laud commercial uses and niulti-famil},
',velopment. The proposal is 1.3 acres in size and wiU provide services to the surrounding neighborhood including
:L apartments and single-family residences. Neighborhood commercial uses work weU for this because they tend to
::nerate less neise and operate shorter hours. CPA-02-09 is consistent with the intention of the Neighborhood
C. C~.f:i:i'1:1
"I-he Coniprehensive plan states that the cieighbarliood coRUliercial designation is intended to provide a lirnited number
(if'commercial services to surrounding residential neighborhoods. The current developmeni on Sullivan Road will
provide new job opportunities within the community. Staff analysis is italicized.
1. LUG-4 ofthe Comprehensive Pian encourages neighborhood and community scale retail c.enter> for tl-ie Cit~-'s
neighborhood. Staff Comment: The sile has recently been developed in coi~farmancP 14'11I1 Ij1c Citv'.s verelap»rent stundarci.
There cme six (6) t2)?CT)11 ,SpCIC•e.s tltat will nllow for asmall-.S'L'iljt' I'tltllj 'OffiCi CC'lllel' /(1 cel"l'L' ljlF' ,C;U7'pIllld117g
nei,Qlr _horho<jcl.
2. LL1P-4.1 of ihe Comprehensive Plan recoilimends intcgrating retail developments into surrounding residentia]
areas «•ith attention to yuality design aIld IUIlC11oil.
Staft'C:ottunent: Tlrt sitC Iru.s 1~~~cenr4, beeti develupeu iii cor forntance wilh tlir• C.'it}•'s developnreitt staiularel
There are stx (b) tenrntt spaces that will allow for a small-scale retaiU office ce»ter to serve the surroundipig
rleighborhood Between the two (2) buildings is cm open catcrtyard that provides arr amenii4yFor tertants anci those
patronizi»g the services offered orr site.
3. I,LJP-4.3 of ihe ComprehetZSive Plan encourages retail arid personal serc-ices to group togettler within planned
ceniers to allow for ease of pedestrian movement.
StaffComment: There are six (6) terrcmt spnces rhcit it-ill c111ow jc)r a s►?rcrll-scnle 'Of'ice cerlte?- to sel-~-C the
surrow:di»g neighborhood.
D. PLTBLIC FACiLITtES
Findings:
The property is curtently served with public water and sewer. Access is provided froni Sullivan Street designated a
Principal Arterial in the Arterial Street Plan and 4"" AvCnue designated a%linnr ,4rterial in the Artzrial Street Plan
(Exhibit 5).
Stafl'Rcport und Rtcommcndation to tht Plar.ning Commission for CI'A-OZ-()I
Page 5 of 6
E. FIN"DIING AND C0ICLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO PCBLIC CONIfmEN'TS
Findings:
Staff has received no public cumment concerning the proposal to date.
Conclusion(s):
Adequate public noticing was conducted for CPA-02-09 in accordance with adopted public noticing procedures.
F. FINDING AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO AGENCY COMMEh°I'S
Findings:
Agency comments relate to the physical development of the property. These comments will be addressed at the time
of development. Comments are attached as exhibits to the staff report.
Conclusion(s):
Staff has reviewed comments and no concerns are noted.
N. OVERALL CONCLUSION
The proposed Comprehensive Plan designation from High Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial and
change in zoning classification MF-2 (High Density Residential) to Neighborhood Commercial is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plans policies and goals.
V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Division after review and consideration of the submitted application and applicable approval criteria
recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of CPA-02-09.
Staff Report and Rccommendation to the Planning Commission far CPA-02-09
Page 6 of 6
Commtjxrrv DEwtopwN'r DerwxTMENr
PLANNT4G DIYISIOY
Sj'~ ~"Mme STAFF REPORT AND RECOM1ViENDATION TO THE
,
00%lley PLAhNING C0NIhIISSION
CYA-03-09
STAFF REPORT DA'I'E: MARCH 49 2009
HEARING DATE Ah'D LOCATION: March 12, 2009, beginning at 6:00 p.m., Spokane Va11ey Ciry Hall Council
Chambers, Valley Redwood Plaza Building, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 101, Spokane Valley, Washington
99206.
PROPOSAL DESCRIPT'IOr: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment from Office (O) to Community Commercial (CC);
corresponding zoning map amendment from Office (O) to Community Commercial (C) on six (6) parcels composing
approximately 3.5 acres of land. This proposal is considered a non-project action under RCW 43.21C.
PitoposAL LocwTloN: The proposal is located between Mullan Road and Argonne Road from the north side
of Boone Avenue to the south side of Sinto Avenue; speciCcally located in the SE'/+ of Section 17, Township
25 North, Range 44, East Willamette Meridian, Spokane Valley, Washington.
0W'N7ER/APPLICANT: City of Spokane Valley Washington
APPLICAN'TS REPRESE.NTATIVE: N/A
APPROVAL CRI'TERIA: Chapter 2(Urban Land Use) of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Title 17 (General
Provision), Tide 19 (Zoning Regulatioas), and Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the Spokane Valley Municipal
Code (SVMC).
StJMMARY OF RECONOiENDATION: The Planning Division, a.fter review and consideration of the submitted application
and applicable approval criteria, recommends that the Planning Commission approve CPA-03-09.
STAFF P'LAN?vER: Martin J. Palaniuk, Planning Technician, Community Development Department
REVUEwEn BY: Greg McCormick, AICP, Planning Manager, Community Development Department
A'I?ACMiENTS:
Exhibit 1: Comprehensive Plan Map
Exhibit 2 Zoaing Map
Exhibit 3: 2007 Aerial Map
Exhibit 4: Vicinity Map
Exhibit 5: Transportation Map
Exhibit 6: SEPA Determination
Exhibit 7: Agency Comments
Staff Rcport and Rccommendntion to the Planning Comnvssion far CPA-03-09
Pagc 1 of 6
L BACKGROUND INFORMATION
APPLICATIOh PROCESSING: Chapter 17.80 Permit Processing Procedures in the Spokane Valley Municipal Code
(SVMC). The following summarizes key application procedures for the proposal.
Application Submitted: M November 1, 2048
I?etermination of Completeness: ~ November 1, 2008
Issuance of Determination of Non-Significance (DNS): M December 19, 2008
End of Appeal Period for DNS: ~ January 6, 2009
Date of Published Norice of Public Hearing: ~ February 27, 2009
Date of Mailed Notice of Public Hearing: ~ February 27, 2009
M
PROPERTY I1h'FORMATION:
Size and Characterisdcs: The site is approximately 3.5 acres in size. The site is relatively flat with some
landscape vegetation.
Comprehensive Plan: ~ Office (O)
Zoning: ~ Office (O)
Existing Land Use: The northernmost parcel contains a vacant retail site used in the past as a
furniture store. The parcels abutting to the south are used for retail sales and
warehousing of floor covering products. Single-family residences are also
located on these parcels. The southernmost parcels contain office uses. ,
SURROUNDItiG C011iPREHENSIVE PLA1, ZONING, AND LAND USES:
North Comprehensive Plan -Community Commercial
Zoning -Community Commercial (C)
Existing Land Uses - Retail and office
South Cornprehensive Plan - PubliclQuasi-Public, and Office
Zoning - Community Facilides (CF) and Office (O)
Existing Land Uses - Christian Center
East Comprehensive Plan - Office and Low Densiry Residential
Zoning - Gurden Office (GO) and Single-family Residential District (R-3)
Existing Land Uses - Retail and office
West Comprehensive Plan - PubliclQuasi-Public, Office and Low Density Residential
Zoning - Garden Office (GO), Community Facilities (CF) and Single Family Residential District (R-3)
Existing Land Uses - Med.ical Office, retail, and office
II. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA
Findings:
Pursuant to Title 21 (Enviroamental Controls) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC), the lead agency has
determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). The Planning Division issued
a Determinadon of Non-Significance (DNS) for the proposal. This decision was made after review of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
Conclusion(s):
The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act and Title 21 of the SVMC have been fulfilled by
the applicant's submittal of the required SEPA Checklist, and the issuance of the City's threshold determination
consisting of a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). No appeals were received.
Staff Rcpart and Recommendation W the Plarming Commission fot CPA-03-09
Page 2 of 6
.
M. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ~
A. COMPLIANCE aTfH TITI.E 17 (GENERAL PROVISIONS) OF THE SPOkANE VALLEY MtNTICIPAL CODE
Findings:
Section 17.80.140 H. fComorehensive Plan Amendment Aaproval Criterial Spokane Vallev Municipal Code
1. The City may approve Comprehensive Plan amendments and area-wide zone map amendments if it finds that
(analysis is italicized):
a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfsre, and
protection of the environment;
Staff Comment: Spokane Yalley's vision slateme»t contained in the Comprehensive plan is "A
community of opporturrity where individucils and fcrmilies can grow and play and businesses can
flourish and prosper. " Section 2.5.2 states that commuitlty commercial classificatio» designates areas
for retcril, service and offtce establishments intended to serve several neighborhoods. The proposed
antendment would provide opportunities for businesses to establish a wider ra»ge of retail, service and
off'rce uses. A wider range of uses will better serve the needs of residential communities located east
and wesl of the site. The public health, safety, and general wel.f'are wi11 be promoted in vccordance
with stcmdards established by the state and the City of Spokane Valley's regulatio»s.
b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the
portion of ttie City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment;
Staff Comment: The proposed amendmenl is cansistent with the Growth Marrcrgensent Act (GMA).
GMA requires jurisdictions to designale the proposed general distribution, location and extenl of lhe
uses of land for housing, commerce and other appropriate land uses. This proposal designates lcmd
for commercial use.
c. The proposed amendment responds to a substandal change in conditions beyond the property owner's
control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies;
Staff Comment: The land uses on the site have remained consistent over the last ten year. The large
retail store fronting Sinto Avenue suffered severe snow drn»age during lhe 100812009 winter and may
require subslantial renovaNon or replacement. As currently zoned the business would be constrained
in reestablishing as a large retail establishment. The proposed amendment would respond to this
change by allowing a wider range of retail uses to reestablTsh at that location.
d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping enor; or
Staff Comment: The proposed cunendment does not correct a mapping error.
e. The proposed amendment addresses an ideotified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan.
Staff Commeat: ?`he proposed amendment does not address cm identified deficiency in the
Comprehensive Plan.
2. The City must also consider the following factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan amendments:
a. The effect upon the physical environment;
Staff Comment: Pursuunt to Title 21 (Errvironmentc:l Controls) of the City of Spokane Yalley Zlniform
Developrnent Code, the lead agency has determined that this proposal does not have a probable
significcmt adverse in:pact on the environment. The entire site is currently developed. Any
enrvironmental impxrcts would have been addressed during the establishment of the current uses. Any
future development will be fully eva►luated for compliance with crll environmental requirements. The
Staff Report and Recommendation m the Planning Commission for CPA-03-09
Page 3 of 6
~
proposed amendment is a non project action and in and of itselJdoes not impose any environmental
impacts on the site.
b. The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes;
Staff Comment: The proposal lies between two busy north/south arterials. The nearest river or stream
is lhe Spokane River which lies approxiinately 1.3 miles »orth of the site. An evaluation conducted as
pcrrt of the emvironmenlal checklist determined that this non project action in and of itself does not have
arry effect on open space, strevms, rivers or lakes. Fulure development will be evaluated at the time it
is proposed.
c. The compadbility with and 'unpact on adjaceot larid uses and surrounding neighborboods;
Staff Comment: The proposed amendment is contrguous to a Comnrunity Commercial Comprehensive
Plan designaNon along its norther» boundary and would hcrve no impact on those uses. Land uses east
and west of the proposal are primcrrily office and a small Baptist church. A Christian Center lies south
of the site. In all cases commurrity commercial would complement the surrounding uses byproviding
retail services to serve those uses such as restaurants, other o,~`'ices, laundry services, personal serves,
etc... The proposed amendment provides the potential for increased commercial services able to serve
the surrounding »eighborhaods.
d. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation,
parks, recreation, and schools;
Staff Comment: The Ciry of Spokane Yalley addresses adequacy of conrmuniry facilities on a citywide
basis through capital facilities planriing. The proposed amendment is located behveen two principal
arterials and public transportation needs are tivell served by a Spokane Transit Authoriry bus line
rzmnirtg north/south along Argonne and Mullan. Utilities hcrve already been established and are
adequately serving the current itses. The proposed amendment will »ot have cm rmpacl on schools
considering the request is for commercial designatio».
e. The benefit to tlie neighborhood, City, and region;
Staff Comment: The proposed amertdment will provide community retail and office establishments for
the surrounding neighborhood. These uses may include art galleries, banking instituiions, beauty
~
services, clothing retail, community buildings, daycares, grocery and harchvure stores, and a variety of
other uses that serve community neighborhoods.
f. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand
for such land;
Staff Comment: The propased crmendment is approximately 3.5 acres in size and will provide
additronal medizart intensity retail and office uses. The potential demand for this type of commercial
developme»t is demonstrated by the current office and retail uses contained on the site.
g. The current and projected poputation density in the area; and
Staff Comment: The proposed cmtendment will potentially have no impact on population density►. The
proposed amendment does not demand populcrtio» analy►sis.
h. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan.
Staff Comment: The site is alreacfy developed and the proposal will have little to no impact on other
elements of the Comprehe»sive Plan. The proposed amendment is co»sistent with the Comprehensive
Plan and wi11 have minimal impact on other aspects of the plrni.
Staff Report and Recommendation to thc Planning Commission for CPA-03-09
Page 4 of 6
B. CO`iPLIANCE NiTH TITLE 19 (ZO:V'TVG REGtjLATiO\'S) OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MiJIVIC.IPAL CODE
I
Findings:
Section 19.60.050 (Office District) Spokane Vallev Municipal Code
The Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment is from Office (O) to Community Commercial (CC) and correspond.ing
zoning map amendment from Office (O) to Community Commercial (C).
The Community Commercial classification designates areas for retail, service and office establishments intended to
serve several neighborhoods. Community Commercial areas should not be larger than 15 to 17 acres in size and
should be located as business clusters raiher than arterial strip commercial. Primary uses including clothing retail,
specialized training and learning schools, restaurants, retail sales, personal services, pawn shops, music stores, office,
museums, are representative of the community commercial district.
The four ~arcels making up the northern section of this site were part of a rezone approved by Spokane County on
August 8, 1997. File No. ZE-4-97 rezoned the parcels from Neighborhood Business (B-1) and Urban Residential-
3.5 (UR 3.5) to the Regional Business (B-3) zone. The pmperty was designated in the Major Commercial category of
the Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive Plan. The subsequent adoption of the Spokane Valley
Comprehensive Plan and zoning regulation changed the land use designation to Office (O) and the zoning from B-3 to
Office (O).
Conclusion(s):
The proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment is contiguous to a community commercial node to the north of the
subject site. Portions of the property have been designated and zoned for commercial use in previous Comprehensive
Plans and zoning regulations. The community commercial is buffered from low density residential on all sides by
office use. The two principal arterials of Argonne Road and Mullan Road provide access required for the higher
intensity of use. CPA-03-09 is consistent with the intention of the Community Commercial District.
C. CoNfPREHEhsrvE Pt.ar
The Comprehensive Plan presents a land use scenario containing the following statement "NeigbborhoodJcommunity
retail centers - current land use patterns dictate that residents travel to the Sprague Avenue corridor to access some of
the most basic goods and services. This scenario would provide for smaller scale, less intensive retaiUcommercial
centers in the south end and northeast portions of the city-. Potential Iocations for these centers would be focused at
intersections of arterials at the periphery of the city, such as Highway 27/32nd Avenue, Dishman Mica
Road/Bowdish Road and Barker Road/Boone Avenue. The proposed amendment is a natural extension of the
Community Commercial retail center established at the Argonne/Mullan Road and Mission Avenue intersection.
l. LUG-4 of the Comprehensive Plan encourages conununity scale retail centers for the City's neighborhoods.
Staff Comment: The site's location bent-een Arga»ie Road and Alullan Roacd and proxintit~v to Mission At-enue
arrd Broadway Avenue provide accessibility to neighborhoods in all directions. The site is souih of and adjacent
to a Commu»ity Commercial arecr ce»tered orr the intersection of Mission Avenue cmd Argonne Road and Mullan
Avenue. The proposed change to Community Commercial rs a logical extension of that center to the south.
2. LUP-4.3 of the Comprehensive Plan encourages retail and personal services to group together within planned
centers to allow for ease of pedestrian movement.
Staff Comment: Since the site is fully developed few opportunities to ease pedestrian moveme»t will be afforded.
The chrmge will place more Community Commercial uses adjacent to the existi»g Commurrfty Commercial
centered on Missio» Avenue and Mtdlan/Argo»ne Roads.
Staff RepoK and Recommrndation to the Planning Commission for CPA-03-09
Page 5 of 6
D. PUBLIC FACILTI'IES
FinaiDgs:
The property is currently served with public water and sewer. Access is provided from Argonne and Mullan Roads.
Both roads are designated Principal Arterials in the Arterial Street Plan (Exhibit 5).
E. FINDING AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO PUBLIC COMMENI'S
Findings:
Staff has received no public comment conceraing the proposal to date.
Conclnsion(s):
Adequate public noticing was conducted for CPA-03-09 in accordance with adopted public noticing procedures.
F. FI~DItiG A.1YD COrCLUSIOVS SPECTFiC TO AGFtiCA' CONftiiF.NTS
Fiadings:
Agency comments relate to the physical deveiopment of the property. These comments will be addressed at the time
of development. Comments are attached as exhibits to the staff report.
Conclusion(s):
The site is fully developed. Staff has reviewed comments and no concerns are noted.
IV. OVERALL CONCLUSION
The proposed Comprehensive Plan designation change from Office (O) to Community Commercial and change in
zoning classification from Office (O) to Community Commercial is consistent with the Comprehensive Plans policies
and goals.
V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Division after review and consideration of the submitced application and applicable approval criteria
recommends that the Planning Comm.ission recommend approval of CPA-03-09.
Stnff Report and Recommrndation to the Planning Commission for CPA-03-09
Page 6 of 6
I
I
CoMMUNrrY DEVE1.oPMEN[' DEPARTmEN'I' ~
P'I.ANNLVG DIVISION
~itt *OpQ
STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE
PL,ANNING CONiMISSION
y
CPA-04-09
.
STAFF REPORT DA'I'E: M.ARCH 4, 2009
HEARING DATE A,ti'D LOCA'noN: March 12, 2009, beginning at 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley Ciry Hall Council
Chambers, Valley Redwood Plaza Building, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 101, Spokane Valley, Wasbington
99206.
PROPOSAL DFSCRIPTIOti: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment to change from Community Commercial (CC) to
Low Density Residential (LDR); corresponding zoning map amendment from Community Commercial (C) to Single-
family Residential Urban District (R-4) on approximately .47 acres of land. This proposal is considered a noo-project
action under RCW 43.21C.
PROPOSAi. LocA'r[o:v: The proposal is located on St Charies Road, approxinnately 780 feet north of Sprague Avenue
on the east side of Progress Road; specifically located in the SE 1/4 of Section 14, Township 25 North, Range 44 East
Willamette Meridian, Spokane Valley, Washington.
OwNEt/ApPLiCA_Nrr': City of Spokane Valley, WA 99206
APPLICANTS REPRESENTATIVE: Planning Division, Community Development Department, City of Spokane Valley
APPROYAL CRIZ'ERIA: Chapter 2(Urban Land Use) of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Pla.n, Tide 17 (General
Provision), Title 19 (Zoning Regulations), and Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the Spokane Valley Municipal
Code (SVMC).
SUNLMAR1r OF REC0NDiEh'DATION: The Planning Division, after review and consideration of the submitted application
and applicable approval criteria, recommends that the Planning Commission approve CPA-04-09.
STAFF PLA?\TER: Martin J. Palaniuk, Plarining Technician, Community Development Department REN'IEn'ED BY: Greg McCocmick, AICP, Planning Manager, Community Development Department
~
ATTACH2►iEh"I'S:
Exhibit 1: Comprehensive Plan Map
Exhibit 2 Zoning Map
Exhibit 3: 2007 Aerial Map
Exhibit 4: Viciniry Map
Exhibit 5: Transportation Map
Exhibit 6: SEPA Determinadon ~
Exhibit 7: Agency Comments
Stnff Rcport and Rccommcndation to thr Planning Commission for CPA444-49
Page 1 of 6
_ ~ .
I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
APPLICA'I'ION PROCESSING: Chapter 17.80 Permit Processing Procedures in the Spokane Valley Muaicipal Code
(SVMC). The following summarizes key application procedures for the proposal.
Application Submitted: ~ November 1, 2008
Determination of Completeness: N November 1, 2008
Issuance of Determination of Non-Sigaificance (DNS): December 19, 2008
End of Appeal Period for DNS: January 6, 2009
Date of Published Notice of Public Hearing: ~ February 20, 2009
Date of Mailed Notice of Public Hearing: ~ February 20, 2009 ,
PROPERTY INFORNiATION:
Size and Characteristics: The site is approximately .47 acres in size and consists of Lots 12, 13, 14, and
15 of Progress Properties Development SUB-02-05. Lots 12 and 14 have
created but remain without structures. Lots 13 and 15 have been fully
developed and contain single family residences now occupied.
Comprehensive Plan: Community Commercial
Zoning: Community Commercial (C)
Existing Land Use: All four lots have been fully developed for residential use. Two lots contain
single famity structures while two remain vacant. ,
SLTRROUNDLNG COMPREHEhSIVE PLAN, ZO\TNG, AN-D L_1\D USF.S:
North Comprehensive Plan -Low Density Residential
Zoning -Single Family Residential Urban District (R-3 )
Existi.ng Land Uses - Single faniily residences
South Comprehensive Plan - Community Commercial
Zoning - Gommunity Commercial (C)
Fxisting Land Uses - Commercial Retail, Medium Box Retail
East Comprehensive Plan - Low Density Residential
Zani.ng -Single Family Residential Urbaa District (R-4)
Existing Land Uses -Outdoor storage, Single family residences
West Comprehensive Plan - Commuaity Commercial
Zoning - Community Commercial (C)
Existing Land Uses - Storage and delivery area for medium box retail
II. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA
Findings:
Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC), the lead agency has
determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). 1he Planning Division issued
a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) for the proposal. This decision was made after review of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lc:ad agency.
Conclusion(s):
The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act and Title 21 of the SVMC have been fulfilled by
the applicant's submittal of the required SEPA Checklist, and the issuance of the City's threshold determination
consisting of a Determination of Non-Sigr►ificance (DNS). No appeals were received.
Staff Rrport and Recommendation to the P{anning Commission for CPA-04-09
Page 2 of 6
III. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
A. COMPLIAhCE WITA TITLE 17 (GENFRAL PRON'IS[OhS) OF TEIE SPOKA~ti-E VALLEI" ML'hICIPAL GODE
Findings:
Section 17.80.140 H. (Comprehensive Plan Amendment Approval Criteria) Stwkane Vallev Municipal Code
1. The City may approve Comprehensive Plan amendments and area-wide zone map amendments if it finds that
(analysis is italicized):
a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and
protection of the environment;
Staff Comment: The subject site contains four residential lots. Si»gle family residential structures
have been built on the two eastern lots. The existing land use designation and zoning mcrke the site
legally nonconforming. As a result, if a»y of the hmuses on the site were to be damaged by frre, Jlood,
neglect or act of god beyond eighty (80) percent of their mcrrkel varlue the owner would not be allowed
to replace the residence. 7'he legally nonconforming stcrtus and inability to rebuild fs considered
detrime»tnl to property values. The amendment protects the properly owrter by creattng fully
co»formi»g uses and structures. Public health, safety, and general welfare will be promoted in
accordcmce with standards established by the state and the City of Spokane Yalley's regulolrons.
b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the
portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment;
Staff Comment: The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements in the Growth
Mcmagemeni Ac1. Specifrcally, the proposal is consistent with all the pla»ning goals established in
RCW 36.70A.020. Examples of those gouls include urban growth, reducing sprawl, housing, and
property rrghts. Adjacent land use designations are copssistent with the proposed amendment.
c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's
control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies;
Staff Comment: The property was in the process of being subdivided when the Crty of Spokane valley
adopled the current Comprehensive Plan. Every effort was made lo pair existi»g/projected land uses
with the land irse designations adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. This property changed land use
concurrent with the adoption of the land use designations in lhe new Comprehensive Plan. As a result
the existing residential use of the property is not consistent with Comprehensive Plan.
d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or
Staff Comment: The proposed cmendment corrects arr inadvertent mapping error created by the
subdivision of the property for residential use concurrent with the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan
Land Use Desig»atiorts.
e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan.
Staff Comment: The proposed amendment does not address an identified deficiency in the
Comprehensive Plan.
2. The City must also consider the following factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan amendments:
a. The effect upon the physical environmeat;
StaffComment: Four lots have been created with single family houses built upon the eastern two lots.
The remairri»g two lots have road, sewer and water improvements bu1 houses hm:e not yet been btdlt.
Pursuant to Title 21 (Emrironmental Controls) of the City of Spokane Valley Uniform Development
Staff Repon and Recommendation to the Planning Commiasioa far CPA-04-09
Page 3 of 6
Code, the lead agency has determiried that this proposal does not hcrve a pi•obable significant adverse
impact on the errvironment. This proposal is a non project action and in and of itself does »ot have any
effect on the physical emironment,
b. The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes;
Staff Comment: There are no surface water bodies on or in the immediate vicinity of site. ?'he lots are
fully developed and will not have any efJ'ect on open space. This proposal is a non project action and I
Irr and of itself does not have rniy efJ'ect on open space, streams, rivers, or lakes.
c. The compatibitity with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods;
Staff Comment: The proposed amendment is contiguous to Low Density Residential Comprehensive
Plan designation to the north and east of the srte and is located within an existing, fulfy-developed
residential neighborhood (Progress Properties Development SUB-02-05). The proposol property, has
been developed with two of the lots contcrining reside»tial structures and two remaining vacant.
d. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation,
parks, recreacion, and schools;
At time of development, the property met all requirements of Phase 1 Development Regidations and the
Spokane Yalley Comprehensive Plcm with regards to concurrency.
e. The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region;
The proposed amendn:ent will provide residential homes close to urbart services and transportation
roules.
f. The quandty and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand
for such land;
The proposed amendment is approxrmately. .47 acres in size and will provide additional residential
:ises. The potential demand for this type of residential development is unknoivn.
g. The current and projected population density in the area; and
The proposed amendment may increase population density by four families. The proposed amendment
does no1 de»:and population analysis.
h. The cffect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will have minimal impact on
other aspects of the plan.
B. C0iN1PLL4NCE WTTA TITLE 19 (ZOh'ING REGULATIONS) OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MiJNICIPAL CODE
Findings:
Section 19.40.060 (R-4 - Sinale-Family Residential Urban District) Spokane Valley Municipal Code
The Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment is from Community Commercial to Low Density Residential and
corresponding zoning map amendment from Community Commercial (C) to Single-family Residential Urban District
(R•4).
The subject site was part of a rezone and concurrent subdivision by Progress Properties LP. The rezone and
subdivision, File No. REZ-Ol-OS and SUB-02-05 was approved June 21', 2005. The parcels contained as part of this
proposed amendment are lots 13 through 16 of the subdivision and were rezoned from Regional Comrnercial (B-3) to
Urban Residential-22 (UR-22). The minimum lot size in the UR-22 zone was 1,600 square feet at the time of
approval and the lots met all requirements for lots size. Single-family residendal was an allowed use in the UR-22
Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Cetnmission for CPA-04-09
Page 4 of 6
zone. When the City of Spokane Valley adopted the Comprehensive Plan in April 2006 ttic
use became inconsistent with the Community Commercial designation adopted with the plan. .
Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Title 19 - Zoning Reguladons states Single-family Residential Urban
District (R-4) provides low density residential development intended to preserve the character of existing
development subject to the dimensional standards of SVMC 19.40.020 - Resideotial Standards. The existing lots
contained in this amendment do not meet the minimum lot area reyuuements of this section. The minimum lot area
required within the R4 district is 6000 square feeL The lots contained in this amendment are less than 6000 square
feet. The minimum required lot depth is 80 feet. The lots in this amendment contain less than 80 feet of lot depth and
do not meet this standard. The lots were legally created and conformed to the standards in effect at the time of their
creation. SVMC 19.20.060 (5) states residential lots made nonconforming relative to lot size, lot depth, seibacks, and
width shall be deemed in conformance with this code, as long as the use of the lot is allowed in the respective district.
Conclnsion(s):
The proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment is contiguous to other Single-Family Residential uses. Although the
existing lots do not comply with the residential standards set forth in the SVMC Title 19 - Zoning Regulations, they
wiU be deemed in conformance with the code when the proposed change is put in effect. CPA-04-09 is consistent
with the intention of the Single-Family Residential Urban District.
C. C0:1-iPREHENSI`'E P1.AN
The Comprehensive plan states the Low Densit}, Residential designation addresses a range of single family residential
densities from one dwelling unit per acre up to and including six dwelling units per acre. The majority of the LDR
designation will provide for densities ranging from four to six dwelling units per acre. Typicallot size will range
frvm 7,000 to 10,000 square feet. Although the existing lots do not meet the density goals associated with low
density residential, they are consistent with surroundi.ng lot sizes and community character. Staff analysis is
italicized.
1. LUG-1 of the Comprehensive Plan encourages the preservation and protection of the character of Spokane
Valley's residential neighborhoods.
Staff Comment: 7'he proposed rnnendment prevents the future development of commercial and lighl industrial
uses on this site. Arry future commerciczl developme»t underlaken on adjacent parcels will be required to meet
lcmdscaping and screeni»g requlrements contained in SVMC 22.70 - Fencing, Screening and Lcmdscaping. This
serves to protect and preserve the residenticrl character of the rteighborhood.
2. LUG-2 of the Comprehensive Plan encourages a wide range of housing types and densities commensurate with
the community's needs and preferences.
Staff Comment: The higher densities contained within this proposal provide 1he opportunityfor the community to
purchase uffordable housing and the added advantage of maintcrirring less yard area. This need may be more
pronounced among the elderly cmd young couples seeking first-time home ownership. The higher density is in
consonance with the adjacent community commercial uses. Higher density provides a wider consumer base for
commercial activity located within close proximity to the proposal.
3. LUG-4 of the Comprehensive Plan seeks to provide neighborhood and community scale retail centers for the
City's neighborhoods.
Staff Comment: The proposed amencfinent provides a portion of the residential component of a»eighborhood
retail center located close to the commercial component.
Staff Repart and Recammendation to the Planning Commission for CPA-04-09
Page 5 of 6
~
D. PUBI,IC FACIt.rrlEs
Findings:
The property is currently served with public water and sewer. Access is provided &om Progress Road via Sprague
Avenue. Sprague Avenue is designated a principal arterial in the Comprehensive Plan (Exhibit 5).
E. FINDING Ar'D CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO PUBLIC CONMENTS
Finaings:
Staff has received no public comment concerning the proposal to date.
Conclusion(s):
Adequate public noticing was conducted for CPA-04-09 in accordance with adopted public noticing procedures.
F. FINDING Ah'D COtiCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO AGENCY C01iAiENTS
Findings:
Agency comments relate to the physical development of the property. These comments will be addressed at the time
of development. Comments are attached as exhibits to the staff report.
Conclusion(s):
Staff has reviewed comments and no concerns are noted.
N. OVERALL CONCLUSION
The proposed change in Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation to Low Density Residential and change in zoning
classification to Single-Family Residential Urban (R-4) is consistent with the Comprehensive Plans policies and goals.
V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Division after review and consideration of ttie submitted application and applicable approval criteria
recommends that ihe Planning Commission recommend approval of CPA-04-09.
Staff Report and RecommendAtion to thc Planning Cammission for CPA-04-09
Pagt 6 of 6
C';•y a` S.rokare Comprehens,v~ r;an
CHAPTER 2 - LAND USE
2.0 Introduction
The Land Use chapter serves as the foundation of the Spokane Valley Comprahensfve Plan
(SVCP) by providing a framework for Spokane Valley's future physical development and by setting
forth policy direction for Spokane Velley's cument and future land uses.
Development of land, according to adopted policies and land use designations discussed fn this
chapter, should resutt in an appropriate balance of services, employment, and housing. The land
use policies ere supplemented by a Comprehensive Plan Map (Map 2.1) that provides a visual
illustration of the proposed physical distribution and location of various land uses. This map
allocates a supply of land tor such uses as retail, office, manufacturina, public facilities. services,
empl~q:~en=-, parics, open space, and housing to meet future demand.
2.1 Plannlng Context
State and county land use policies provide a statutory framework for the development of City land
use policies. It is important to briefly review state and county level policies to better understand
historical conditions that have shaped the goals and policies in this chapter.
2.1.1 (3rowth Management Act
The Growth Management Act (GMA) acicnowledges that, a lack of common goals expressing the
public's interest in conservation and the wise use of our lands pose a threat to the environment,
sustalnable economic development, and the health, safety and high quality of life enjoyed by
residents of this state'." The GMA provides a framework for content and adoption of local
comprehensive plans. The GMA provides 14 goals to be, used exclusively for the purpose of
guiding development of comprehensive plans and development regulations.' GMA goals pertaining
to land use include:
• Urban Growth - Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities
and services exist or can be provided in en efficient manner.
• Reduce Sprewl - Reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling,
low density devetopment.
• Housing - Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the
population of the state, promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and
encourage preservation of exisang housing stock.
• Open Space end Recnaation - Encourage the retention of open space and development of
recreational opportunities, conserve fish and wildtife habitat, inerease access to natural
resource lands and water, and develop parks.
• Environmenf - Protect the environment and enhance the state's high quality of life,
including air and water quality and the availability of water.
• Publrc Facilities and Seivices - Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to
support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the
development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels
below locally established minimum standards.
• Historic Preservation - Identify and encourage the preservation of lands, sites, and
structures that have historical or archaeological significance.
~ RCW 36.70A.010 .
Adopted April 25,2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 1 of 36
- ,
Ciry of Spakane Valley Comprehensive Plan
• Property Rights - Private property shall not be taken for public use without just
compensation having been made. The property rights of landawners shall be protected
from arbitrary and discriminatory actions pursuant to state and federal law.
The GMA requires that Comprehensive Plan land use elements include the following:
• Designate the proposed general distribution, location and extent of the uses of land for
housing, commerce, industry, recreation, open spaces, public utilities, public facilities,
and other appropriate land uses;
• Population densities, building intensities, and estimates of future population growth;
• Provide for protection of the qualiry and quantity of ground water use for public water
supplies;
• Review drainage, flooding, and stormwater runoff in the area and nearby jurisdictions
and provide guidance for corrective actions to mitigate or cleanse those discharges that
pollute water of the state.
2.1.2 County VYide Planning Policies
The County Wide Planning Policies (CWPPs) required by GMA2 provide a regional framework to
achieve the goals of the GMA. The CWPPs are a refinement of policy direction contained in the
GMA and are a resuit of a collaborative process between Spokane County and the cities and towns
within the County.
The CWPPs provide a policy framework for both the county and its respective cities. Adherence to
these policies ensures that plans within the county are consistent with one another. These policies
address such issues es the designation of urban growth areas, land use, affordable housing,
provision of urban services for future development, transportation, and contiguous and orderly
development. The following are specific CWPPs that relate to the Land Use Element3:
Pollcy Toplc 1- Urban Growth Areas
Policies
1. Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) are areas within which urban growth shall be encouraged and
outside of which growth can occur only if it is not urban in nature. Urban Growth Areas
(UGAs) shall include areas and densities sufficient to pemnit the urban growth that is
projected to occur in the county ior the succeeding 20-year period4.
"Urban growth' refers to growth that makes intensive use of land for the location of
buildings, structures and impermeable surfaces to such a degree as to be incompatible with
the primary use of such land for the production of food, other agricuttural products or fiber,
or the extraction of mineral resources5.
Urban growth should be located first in areas already characterized by urban growth that
have existing public facility and service capacities to serve such development, and second
in areas already characterized by urban growth that will be served by a combination of both
existing public facilities and services, and any additional needed public facilities and
services that are provided by either public or private sources. Further, it is appropriate that
urban government services be provided by cities, and urban govemment services should
not be provided in rural arease. Rural govemment services may be provided in rural areas.
Hawever, Urban Growth Areas may be established independent of incorporated areas.
Within these independent Urban Growth Areas (UGAs), urban governmental services may
' RCW 36.70A210
' Note to reader. The followfng palldes are numbered according to the policy number In the CWPPa, resultfig In non-sequentlal
numbering In thls document.
` RCW 36.70A.110
° RCW 36.70A.030(1 7)
~ RCW 36.70A.110(3)
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 2 of 36
.
City of Spokane Vailey Comprehensive Plan
be provided by other than cities. Some ci;ies may rely on contracts from Spokane County
for provision of urban services.
Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) include all lands within existing cities, including cities in rural
areas.
9. Within Urban Growth Areas (UGAs), lands that fall within planned high-capacity
transportation corridors should be designated for sufFcient intensity of land use to support
the economic provision of multimodal transportation.
11. Where eppliceble, comprehensive plans should contain land use policies vihich provide
protection for the continued viability of Fairchild Air Force Base, Spokane Intemational
Airport, Felts Field, Deer Partc Alrport and other publicly awned eirports within Spokane
Courrty.
12. Jurisdictions should work together to protect critical areas and open space within Urban
Grawth Areas (UGAs).
Policy Topic 2- Joint Planning within UGAs
Policies
1. The joint planning process should:
a. Include all jurisdictions adjacent to the Urban Grawth Area and Special Purpose
Districts that will be affected by the eventual transference of govemmental services;
b. Recognize that Urban Growth Areas ere potential annexation areas for cities;
c. Ensure a smooth transition of services amongst ewsting municipalities and emerging
communities;
d. Ensure the ability to expand urban govemmerrtal services and avoid land use barriers
to expansion; and
e. Resolve issues regarding how zoning, subdivision and other land use approvals in
designated joint planning areas will be coordinated.
2. Joint planning may be accomplished pursuant to an interfocal agreement entered into
between andlor among jurisdictions and/or special purpose districts.
Policy Topic 3- Promotlon of Contiguous and Orderly Development and Provision ot Urban
Services
Policies
5. All jurisdictfons shall coordinate plans that classify, designate and protect natural resourc,e
lands and critical areas.
7. Each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan shall include, at a minimum, the following policies to
address adequate fire protection:
a. Limit growth to areas served by a fire protection district or within the corporate (imits of
a city providing its own fire department.
b. Commercial and residential subdivisions and developmeMs and residential planned
unit developments sha11 include the provision for road access adequate for residents,
fire department or district ingress/egress, and water supply for fire protection.
c. Develapment in forested areas must provide defensible space between structure and
adjacent fuels and require that fire-reted roofing materials be used.
10. Each jurisdiction shall include provisions in its comprehensive plan for equitable distribution
of essential public facilities.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page3of36
City of Spokane Vailey Comprehensive Plan
13. Each jurisdiction shall plan for growth within UGAs which uses land efficientiy, adds
certainty to capital facilities planning and allows timely and coordinated extension of urban
governmental senrices, public facilities and utilities for new development. Each jurisdiction
shall identify intennediate growth areas (six to ten year increments) within its UGA or
establish policies which direct growth consistent with land use and capital facility plans.
Policy Topic 4- Parks and Open Space
Policies
2. All jurisdictions should cooperate to identify and protect regional open space lands, natural
areas and corridors of environmental, recreational and aesthetic significance to fonn a
functionally and physically connected system which balances passive and active
recreational uses. Each jurisdiction shall identify open space corridors within and befinreen
urban growth areas.
All jurisdictions shall identify implementation, manegement, preservation and conservation
strategies through both regulatory and non-regulatory techniques, to protect identified lands
and corridors to sustain their open space benefits and functions. Implementation and
management strategies should include collaboration and coordination with land trusts and
other land preservation organizations.
3. Each jurisdiction shall require the development of parks and open space as a means to
balance the impacts associated with higher-density development.
5. Each jurisdiction shall make appropriate provisions for parics and recreation areas.
Policy Topic 5 - Transportation
Policies
5. Local jurisdictions shall develop and adopt land use plans that have been coordinated
through the Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) to ensure that they preserve
and enhance the regional transportation system. These plans may include high-capacity
transportation corridors and shall fulfill air quality conformity and financial requirements of
Federal Transportation Laws and Regulations, the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, and
the GMA.
6. Local jurisdictions shall designate within land use plans areas that can support public
transportation services. These areas shall include existing as well as new development.
Each jurisdiction's land use plan, the regional transportation plan and the Spokane Transit
Authority's (STA) Long Range Transit Plan shall support, complement and be consistent
wfth each other.
11. Each jurisdiction shall address land use designations and site design requirements that are
supportive of and compatible with public transportation, for example:
a. pedestrian-scale neighborhoods and activity centers;
b. mixed-use development; and
c. pedestrian friendly and non-motorized design.
Pollcy Toplc 7- Affordable Housing
Policies
2. Each jurisdiction's development policies, regulations and standards should provide for the
opportunity to create affordable housing in its community. Such policies may include
regulatory tools, such as inclusionary zoning, perform an ce.1impact zoning, mixed-use
development and incentives for increasing density to promote greater choice and affordable
housing in its community.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 4 of 36
City o` Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
6. ln conjunction with other policy topics, coordinate housing, transportation and economic
development stretegies to ensure that sufficient land and densities for affordable housing
are provided in locations readily accessible to employment centers.
2.2 Land Use Plan
Spokane Valley's land use pattern (the physical location of uses) exists as a resuit of development
administered by Spokane County until incorporation of Spokane Valley on March 31, 2003 end to a
far lesser extent the subsequent development under Spokane Valley's jurisdiction. As shown in
Figure 2.1 below, the majority of land is designated residential (57%) under this Plan. Of the land
designated residential, 50% is designated as Low Density Residential with densitjes up to six
dwelling units per acre. Nearly 20% of the land area is designated as Heavy and Light Industrial.
The remaining land is designated as commercial, office, or publiclquasi public.
Comprehensive Plan Designations - Land
PubklCluad-Public Area
ParklOpen Space 796 Cily Cenmr CaRnunt/ Cortmerosl
396 R~al Cornmer T 196 296
Neighborhood 010e 3% Corridor Mbcad Use
~ 3%
Cormterdal 2°' ~ •
0°6 Heevy Industial
Maed Use 14%
3% _ ~ HOR
MOR '3°Jb
4% \
Light Indusrial
LDR 6%
50%
Figure 2.1: Land Use by Comprehensive Plan Category
2.2.1 City Center Plan
This scenario presents concepts and strategies for creating a definable and vibrant "City Center' for
the Ctty of Spokane Valley. The purposes of creating a Spokane Valley City Center are:
1. Create an identifiable city center that is a social and economic focus of the City;
2. Strengthen the City overall by providing tor long-term growth in employment and housing;
3. Promote housing opportunlties close to employment and services;
4. Develop land use pattems that support the development of a more extensive regional
transportation system, whatever the uttimate configuration may be;
5. Reduce dependency on automobiles;
6. Consume less land with urban development;
7. Maximize the public investment in infrastructure and services;
8. Provide a central gathering place for the community; and
9. Improve the quality of dasign for development throughout the City.
There are several reasons why e definable, vital City Center is important to Spokane Valley's
future. These include:
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 5 of 36
mmmmmIq
City of Spokane Valiey Comprehensive Plan
1. The development of a more intensive, mutti-use city center is a natural step in Spokane
Valley's evolution. Most new urban areas start out as bedroom communities. Retail and
commercial uses then develop to serve the new residential population. Office and
industrial activities next begin to locate at key transportation crossroads, adding jobs and
strengthening the employment base. Spokane Valley has experienced these evolutionary
phases and is now ready for a defined City Center.
2. Economic Development - Spokane Valley has an opportunity to transform itseff from an
essentially residential community with retail and service based economy to a sub-regional
economic center with an expanded, more diverse employment base.
3. Community Support - A survey of Spokane Vatley area citizens prior to incorporation
overwhelmingly indicated that the lack of identffiable °downtown' and a community
gathering place was of concern to a majority of respondents. Community support was
tested again when the city conducted a statistically valid survey in the spring of 2004. The
support to create a City Center was reiterated throughout the community meetings held
during the development of the comprehensive plan and the city's informal community
survey. A discussion of the resuits of the city's survey is included in Section 2.10.
The following could be componerrts of the City Center.
1. Location: Generally located along the Sprague/Appleway corridor.
2. Size: Between 300 and 400 acres in size.
3. Streets: New streets could be added at every 200 to 400 feet to create an internal grid
street system to provide an urban atmosphere.
4. On-street parking would be provided on intemal grid streets.
5. Ground floor retail on both sides of streets.
6. Building out to the edge of the right-of-way and include wide sidewalks to encourage a
lively street scene.
7. Office/Employment uses provided in high visibility locations with adequate parking and
adjacent to pleasant surroundings such as open space, retail shops and services.
8. Multi family housing that is safe, secure, and located so that it is buffered from traffic noise
and provides a pedestrian friendly streetscape with connections to parks, schools,
shopping, services and transit.
9. Civic/public uses such as city hall, community library, performing arts center, city center
park, green space or other public uses that would attract people to downtown over an
extended portion of the day.
Other characteristics of this (and use scenario include the following:
1. Neighborhood/community reteil centers - current land use pattems dictate that residents
travel to the Sprague Avenue corridor to access some of the most basic goods and
services. This scenario would provide for smaller scale, less intensive retaillcommercia)
centers in the south end and northeast portions of the city. Potential locations for these
centers would be focused at intersections of arterials at the periphery of the city, such as
Highway 27/32nd Avenue, Dishman Mica RoadlBowdish Road and Barker RoadlBoone
Avenue.
2. OfFce zoning districts - currently, there is no specific zoning district or comprehensive plan
designation for professional office uses. The county has used the UR-22, Multi family
zoning district as its office district, which has resufted in a number of issues related to
rezones and appropriate development standards. Areas that are cuRently developed in
predominantly office uses would be re-designated to an "Office' comprehensive plan
designation and zoning districts developed to implement this plan designation would
include development standards to implement the policies of the comprehensive plan.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 6 of 36
. . . _ . , . - . - I" .
Specific areas in the city include the Evergreen corridor north of Sprague Avenue; Mis!i::_-~
east of Pines Road in the Valley HospitaVmedical office area; near the intersedion of Rr I_~:_
Road end Broadway; and other areas identified through the land use inventory process.
3. 'Auto-Row' Overlay - The city has several ne+v auto dealerships located afong Sprag,~c
Avenue. The majority of these dealerships are located between Argonne Road and
Thierman Road. Two dealerships are located just west of Dartmouth Road, near the U-City
Mall. New car dealerships provide the city with substantial sales tax revenue on one hand,
on the other hand auto dealerships can have a signfficant visual impact on e community
end heve somewhat unique needs related to development standards, such as signage and
street frontage landscaping. This scenerio recognizes these circumstances and designates
the areas idenbfied above appropriately, and provides policy direction for the implementing
development regulations.
4. Mixed-use - this scenario suggests reducing the strip commercial on Sprague Avenue by
maintaining Community Commercial ioning only at major intersections such as Pines,
Evergreen and Sullivan Roads. Areas in between these commercial "nodes" would be
designated as Comdor Mixed-use or some other appropriate designation, which would
encourage conversion of these vacant and/or dilapidated commercial areas into areas of
officelemployment, residential and specialty retail.
5. Industrial areas would not be significantly changed or altered under this or any other
scenario. Permitted uses and development standards would be reviewed for
appropriateness and changes proposed based on policy direc#ion of the comprehensive
plan.
6. The majority of land in the City of Spokane Veliey is dedicated to single family residential
zoning and land use. The majority of the single family residential areas are designated Low
Density Residential under the interim comprehensive plan. This plan designation allows for
residential densities from one to six dwelling units per acre. Under this scenario, the
existing single family residential zoning districts would be evaluated, and a series of single
family districts with minimum lot sizes ranging from 7,000 to 10,000 square feet would be
considered. Reducing overall lot sizes would enable the city to maintain its existing single
family character, and minimize land needed for mutG-family zoning to acoommodate the
city's 20 year population growth projection.
7. Areas previously platted in 1+/- acre lots - There are areas in the City that were platted as
approximatety one acre lots. These areas would be rezoned to an R-1 zoning designation
with the intent to preserve the original intent of the zoning for these areas. Moreover, these
areas would be allowed to maintain a small number of (ivestock such as horses, cows, or
Ilames in keeping with the rural character of these neighbofioods.
2.3 RelationshlQ to Other Comprehensive Plan Chapters
The land use concept set forth in this chapter is consistent with all SVCP chapters. Intemal
consistency among the chapters of the SVCP translates into coordinated growth and an efficient
use of limited resources. Below is a brief discussion of how the Land Use chapter relates to the
other chapters of the SVCP.
2.3.1 Economlc Development
Spokane Valley's economy is disproportionately divided. Dr. Grant Forsyth, Assistant Professor of
Economics at Eastem Washington University prepared e report based on year 2000 Census
information for the Spokane Valley area. This report, 'A Demographic and Economic Anatysis for
the City of Spokane Valley' indicates that there were nearly 3,000 employer firms employing
approximatefy 43,305 people in the year 2000 with an average annual payroll per employee of
approximately $29,000 (in 2000 dollars).
Dependence on retail trade and service occupations stems primarily from the City's evolution into a
regional shopping destination for eastem and southem Spokane County and counties in northern
Adopted April 25, 2046 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 7 of 36
,
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Idaho. Increased regional competition from other retail areas, such as Post Falis and Coeur
d'Alene and the City of Spokane, may impact the City's sbility to capture future retail dollars. To
improve Spokane Valley's economic outlook, the economic development strategy is to promote a
more diverse economy. A diversified economy would achieve e better balance between jobs and
housing and support the City's desired quality of life. I
In conjunction with the Economic Development chapter, this Land Use chapter promotes the
following:
1. A City Center composed of mid-rise office buildings, mixed-use retail, and housing.
2. Redevelopment and development of the Sprague Avenue/Appleway Boulevard corridor into
an area of quality commercial and Mixed-use development.
3. Establishment of design standards.
4. Preservation of existing single family neighborhoods.
The land use map designations support development necessary to achieve the above (see the
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map 2.1). A complete discussion of economic development is set
forth in the Economic Development chapter.
2.3.2 Capital Facilides
Capital facilities provided by the City include: transportation and streets, parks and open space, and
surface water management. The amount and availability of urban services and infrastructure
influences the lacation and pace of future growth. The City is responsible for the construction and
maintenance of parks and recreation facilities, streets and transportation improvements, and
surface water facilities. Providing for future growth while maintaining exasting improvements
depends upon the community's willingness to pay for the construction and financing of new facilities
and the maintenance of existing facilities.
As outlined in the Capital Facilities Plan, new infrastructure and senrices may be financed by impact
fees, grants, designated capital taxes (real estate excise tax, fuel tax, utility tax), money from the
City's general fund or voter approved bonds.
To capitalize on the City's evailable resources for urban services end infrastructure, this Land Use
chapter recognizes that concentrating growth is far more cost effective than allowing continued
urban sprawl. Concentrating growth also supports the enhancement of future transit improvements.
Annexation of Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) to the Citv of Spokane Vallev mav be a loQical
proaression to ensure centralized planninq and prevention of urban sprawl. A major qoal of the
GMA is to reduce urban sprawl bv encouraqinq develoPment in urban areas where adeauate public
facilities exist GMA further states, that cities are the loaical provider of urban qovernment services.
Prior to annexation, the Citv of Spokane Vallev will consider the economic impacts of providinQ
municipal services at a level consistent with other areas within the Citv. The Citv will not provide a
lower level of service in areas beinQ considered for annexation that were in existence in the
proposed areas at the time immediatelv precedinq the annexation process. The Citv will consider
PAAs' topoQraphv. land utiliiation, and populatjon densitv when determininQ service levels.
Water Availability - Po#able water is provided to residents of Spokane Valley by thirteen water and
irrigation districts. All drinking water used by residents in Spokane Valley is drawn from the
Spokane Valley/Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer.
Water Quality - Maintaining a clean source of water is vital to the health and livability of the City.
Preserving water quality ensures e clean source of drinking water and continued health of the City's
streams and lakes. Maintaining water quality is also important for maintaining the health of the
aquifer that relies on surface water for recharge.
Contamination of an aquifer by contaminated surface water can lead to serious health concerns
and/or expensive treatment requirements. To address this concern and impacts of new
development, the City has adopted a Stormwater Management Plan. The plan specifies actions to ~
ensure water, quality including the development of detention/retention facilities to control rate and
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 8 of 36
1
Ciry of Spokane Valiey Comprehensive P(an
quality of water runoff. Furthermore, development of a weilhead protectior - • ~
various water providers should provide guidelines to avoid possible contaminatic
Policies coMained in the Natural Environment chapter provide direction for
wellheads and in equffer recharge areas. For a compiete discussion of water resources and water
purveyors in the City of Spokane Vailey, reter to the Capita( Faci(ities chapter.
2.3.3 Parks and Open Space
One of the most important and valued elements of a high quality living and working environment is
a parks and open space system. Providing parks and open spaces contributes to a reduction in
environmental impacts such as noise and air pollution; increases the value of adjacent properties;
provides areas for passive and active recreation; and helps preserve the natural beauty of the City.
2.3.4 Naturat Environment
Spokane Val{ey's natural beauty is apparent. Streams, wetlands, surrounding mountains and the
Spokane River provide a scenic backdrop as weN as a source for active and passive recreation for
the c'rtizens of Spokane VaNey. The Land Use chapter seeks to protect Spokane Vailey's unique
natural resources through poficies that support the preservation of these areas for future
generations. The Natural Environment chapter aiso inctudes a discussion of critical areas as
defined by GMA. For a complete discussion, please refer to the Natural Environment chapter.
2.3.6 Housing
Housing is a basic human need and a major factor in the quality of life for individuals and families.
An adequate supply of affordable, ettractive, and functional housing is fundamental to achieving a
sense of community. The central issue refated to land use is supplying enough land to
accommodate projected growth for a range of incames and households. Presenily, housing is
provided primarily fn single-family subdivisions.
This plan sets forth strategies to increase housing options and choices. The Land Use chapter
advocates changes to current development codes to increase flexibility in plariing land and
encourage housing as part of mixed-use developments in commercial areas. The latter provides an
opportunity to locate housing closer to employment and shopping, and to create affordable housing.
A complete discussion of housing can be found in the Housing chapter.
2.4 Potentlal Annexation Areas
2.4.1 Projected Growth
In October 2003, the City of Spokane CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Valley received a 2000 population POPULATION ESTIMATES
certification from the U.S. Census 150,000
Bureau that indicated 80.927 people called Spokane Valley home an April 140,000
(
1, 2000. As ot April 1, 2003 the 130,000 population had grown to 82,005 120,000 (based on the Washington State »o,ooo ~ ~r l
Office of Financial Management
(OFM) population estimates). Upon 100,000 incorporation on March 31, 2003, the 90,000
~
City of Spokane Val(ey became the 80,000 state's ninth largest city and second
largest in Spokane County. `'oaoPoo, o`'o~~p0&`bo~~, %,~b.'rP,~,Do~oo ~b
Spokane Valley received an OFM
PopUWUm: ncri,,,uE:timut
population estimate for April 1, 2004
of 83,950. This new population PoDdation Esiimsls: 1.S% Growlh Rate
estimate moved Spokane Valley from PopLidi«, Estimae: 2.6% arowu, Rate
the state's ninth (argest city to the
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 9 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
state's eighth largest city. The 2004 population estimate reflects an annual increase of
approximately 2.4 percent over the city's 2003 population estimate. The most recent OFM estimate
~ for Spokane Valley is 88,24~Q-920 as of April 1, 2-0-2008. This figure represents an annual growth
rate of approximately 1.5 percent. The average annual growth rate is approximately 1.91 % over
the 4 year period from 2003 to 2007.
Future population growth is forecasted at the state and county level by OFM. This future population
growth was distributed between jurisdictions and unincorporated Spokane County through a
methodology prepared by the Spokane County Steering Committee of Elected Officials (SCEO).
The City of Spokane Valley was not allocated population growth originally because the City had not
been incorporated when this action took place. However, the County did allocate population to the
"Spokane Valley IUGA", which includes the new cities of Spokane Valley snd Liberty Lake.
This process resulted in a population growth allocation of 39,431 to the Spokane Valley IUGA. This
IUGA also includes areas within the UGA that are still in unincorporated Spokane County. The
graph above indicates Spokane Valley's 20 year population using a 1.5% end 2.5% annual growth
rate.
Using the 1.5% annual growth rate, which is consistent with past estimated growth rates in the
Spokane Valley area, the estimated 2025 population of Spokane Valley is 114,765 or an increase
of 30,815 persons. The 2.5% annual growth rate results in a 2025 population of 141,011, an
increase of 57,061.
Spokane Valley proposed a population allocation of 20,666 to the SCEO based on the regional land
capacity methodology. This request was proposed as an "interim' request based on the
land/population capacity within the existing corporate boundaries of Spokane Valley. The reason
for this request was based on the significant issues related to waste water treatment capacity.
Once the waste water issues have been resolved, Spokane Valley will prepare a revision to the
population allocation and present this information to the SCEO. This issue is discussed in more
detail below. The Spokane County Board of County Commissioners (BoCC) approved this
population allocation in November 2004. ~
The Cfty has continued to refine the population projections based on the preceding information. At
a City Council retreat held on February 11, 2006, the City Council directed staff to utilize a 1.89% I
annual growth rate for purposes of population forecasting. This resulted in a 20 year population
forecast of 38,614 persons. This information was presented to the SCEO on February 15, 2006
when the City officially requested a 20 year population allocation of 38,614 for planning purposes.
In 2006 the BoCC approved via Resolution 06-0438 a population allocation of 33,125 for Spokane
Valley tor planning purposes.
2.4.2 Land Capacky Analysls
The GMA does not require a Population and Land Capacity Element to be included in the
comprehensive plan. However, GMA does require that Land Use, Housing and Capital Facilities
Elements include population densities, building intensities and estimates of future population
growth. The GMA also requires a Land Capacity Analysis, or the theoretical holding capacity of the
designated Urban Growth Areas, which by definition includes cities. By assigning the expected
population growth to the results of the Lend Capacity Analysis, the area required to eccommodate
the population grovvth is shaped.
Countywide population forecasts are identified by the CWPPs, as one criterion for consideration in
developing a regional methodology or countywide population allocation. The countywide growth
target is based on the OFM growth management population forecast for Spokane County.
The Land Quantity Analysis Methodology for Spokane County was developed through the efforts of
the Land Quantity Technical Committee between March 1995 and October 1995. The Growth
Management Steering Committee of Elected Officials adopted that methodology on November 3,
1995.
The adopted methodology is patterned after the Washington State Department of Community,
Trade and Economic Development's (CTED) land quantity inventory guidebook entitled Issues in
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 10 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Designating Urban Growth Areas Part Providfng Adequate Urban Area Land Supply. Use of that
document was specified by the adopted Countywide Planning Policies (Policy Topic 1(Urban
Growth Areas Policy #3). Hawever, the step-by-step CTED process was modified somewhat by the
Land Quantity Technical Committee to reflect unique circumstances in Spokane County.
The following steps of the regional methodology were followed by Spokane Valley in conducting the
land capacity analysis:
1. Identify lands that ere potential candidates to accommodate future growth - vacant,
partially-used and under-utflized land (in other words, subtract all parcels committed to
other uses).
2. Subtract all parcels that the community defines as not developable because of physical
limitation.
3. Subtract lands that will be needed for ather public purposes.
4. Subtract all parcels that the commun'rty determines ere not suitable for development for
social and economic reasons.
5. Subtract that percentage of land that the community assumes will not be available for
development within the community plan's 20.year time frame.
6. Build in a safety factor.
7. Detennine tatal capacity.
Spokane Valley prepared a land capacity analysis of the city and surrounding UGAs based on the
above regional methodology. T#e-oFi9iR@ -ana4ys+s-}r~4ided-~#~e-A!~'.~-~a~~'--~a~~~~-R~ca~
The
S~~-J~ne 24 -an~ly-29-,40444er-pu9)06es-of requeM+flg-a-p~Ujati~-R-al1nr,:;1iEn-#eF plann+ag
I p-uqx~s~ The results of the land capacity analysis are contained in the table below:
Table 2.1 Spokane Valley UGA Land Capacity Anatysis (uadated J~ly 200412106/09)
Vacant and Net Developable PotenUal Nsw Poputatlon
Aroa Partlally Used Acroa awelling Untta Capaclty
Land
Spo{cene Valley 3,710 1,478 8,408 20,666
(Incorporated Area)
Nottheast j 43 8 32 ~ 80
Northwoal 862 358 1,496 % 3,739
East ~ 584 151 1,554 I 3,269
8outhqst 310 , 148 685 1,463
3outh _ 757 ~ 18 73 -184
Ponderosa 40 0 0 0
EdgeclifUDlshmsn I 161 ~ 9 j _35 ' _88
TOTAL 6,467 2,166 12,183 29,489
Spokane Valley recommended to the Steering Committee that both the City of Spokane Valley and
the City of Liberty Lake receive en interim population allocation that could be accommodated within
the existing city limits of each city. The rationale for this recommendation was based on the
situation regarding sanitary sewer throughout the entire Spokane region.
It is estimated that the Spokane County treatment plant will run out of capacity in 2009, and the
Liberty Lake Water & Sewer District treatment capability is currently at or near capacity. Permits to
expand the Spokane County and Liberty Leke plants from the Washington State Department of
Ecology and the Environmental Protection Agency are currently in doubt. Given the potential
constraint for both jurisdictions to provide this vital urban service, the Steering Committee
forwarded a recommendation to the Spokane County Board of County Commissioners to ellocate
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 11 of 36
City of Spokane Vailey Comprehensive Plan
only the population that could be accommodated within existing city limits until such time as the
sanitary sewer issues are resolved.
2.4.3 Potentlal Annexation Areas
The purpose of this section is to identify the unincorporated areas within the existing Spokane
County UGA that are adjacent to the City of Spokane Valley, which would comprise potential
annexation areas for the City. Map 2.2 indicates potential annexation areas (PAAs) for the City of
Spokane Valley.
Spokane County adopted its first comprehensive plan developed under GMA in 2001. A complete
examination of urban services was required at the time the County established the UGA, moreover,
Spokane County was obligated to comply with the State Environmental Policy Act. The County's
plan included the designation of a regional UGA, which included the still unincorporated area of
Spokane Valiey. The County utilized the SEPA/GMA integration process to fulfill the environmental
review requirements of the plan including the designated UGA.
When Liberly Lake incorporated in 2001 and Spokane Valley incorporated in 2003 much af the
"Valley UGA' was included as part of the newly created cities, but not all. In 2003 and again in
2006, Liberty Lake completed annexations totaling 975.69 acres of the County designated UGA.
These annexations resulted in a nearly 34 percent increase (from 4.5 square miles to just over 6
square miles) in land area for Liberty Lake.
As Table 2.1 indicates there are a number of unincorporated UGAs adjacent to Spokane Valley.
Several of these UGAs are only contiguous to Spokane Valley (south, southeast, and northeast)
and would be logical areas for future annexation to the City of Spokane Valley. Spokane County
and the metro cities of Spokane Valley, Spokane, Liberty Lake and Airway Heights have begun the
process of updating the regional UGA consistent with the county wide planning policies (CWPPs).
Through this process, the City of Spokane Valley will identify ereas needed to accommodate
allacated populabon growth by re-evaluating land quantity analysis and urban service delivery.
2.4.4 Development of Goals, Policies, and Actions for Annexation
The Growkh Manaaement Act (GMA) reQUires counties to desiQnate Urban Growth Area (UGAs)
within which urban prowth shall be encouraqed RCW 36.70A.110 (1). UGAs are to Include
sufficient land to accommodate the twentv-vear population qrowth proiected for the countv. The
GMA imposes alanninQ reQUirements to influence the abilitv of a citv to annex UGAs. A citv is
required bv GMA to adoqt policies for land use, housinQ, capital facilities utilities, and
transportation within the citv's UGA. In order to meet this requirement the Citv af ~vokane Vallev,
has developed policies and qoals to provide policy quidance for annexation of territorv within UGAs.
Annexation will have financial impacts on the citv: it mav be positive or neoative. The c'ilv
need to develop an annexation studa to assess the
financial impacts especiallv for laraer annexations.
The Capital Facilities chapter identifies cuRent service
aroviders within the Potential Annexation Areas
(PAAs) as a startinq point for the detailed analvsis
. ,
that mav be needed prior to annexation.
2.6 Land Use Destgnatfons _
~
The land use designations in the SVCP recognize the
. . . , . . _ .
relationships between broad patterns of land uses.
The designations set forth locational criteria for each
specfic class of uses consistent with the long-term ' '"'.~T' _ . ,
objectNes of the SVCP. These designations provide . ,J 4~`~'~f.r'►
~ ~ `r t:
the purpose and intent for specific zoning districts. _ +t ~c.;.~~,' t~;~
The location of the comprehensive plan land use designations are shown on the Comprehensive Plan - Land Use Map (Map 2.1).
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 12 of 36
~
City of Spokane Valiey Comprehensive Plan
2.6.1 Residential
The demend for and development of single-farnily housing is expected to continue for the
foreseeabie future. Single-family development will occur as in-fili development of vacant or under
developed lots scattered throughout existing neighborhoods, and as subdivisions on vacant tracts
of land. To address future housing needs, the Land Use chapter encourages new techniques for
developing single-family housing. Such techniques include clustering, planned unit developments,
lot size avereging, zero lot line development, accessory dwelling units and special needs housing.
Low Densfty ResldenUal
The Low Density Residential (LDR) Comprehensive Plan designation addresses a range of single
family residential densities from one dwelling unit per acre up to and including six dwelling units per
acre. This designation would be implemented through a series of zoning designations as described
below.
Implementing zoning for the LDR
designation will include e series of zones -
allowing a renge of minimum lot sizes.
Existing lot sizes and community character
will be strongly considered when
developing the City's zoning map. For
example, areas such as Rotchford Acres
an d Pon derosa wi l l li ke ly require m in imum
lot sizes close to an acre in size. These ~ - -
large lot developments cuRently allow for -
horses and other large animals and have a
distinct character that should be preserved
to the greatest extent possible. The
majority of the LDR designation will -
provide for densities ranging from four to -
six dwelling units per acre. Typical lot sizes will range from 7,000 to 10,000 square feet. Some areas designated as LDR sall lack
necessary urban services and infrastructure, mainly sanitary sewer facilities. Upon provision of
urban senrices, such as water and sewer, and transit services, an increase in density in some areas
may be warranted. However, the City will adopt strict criteria to evaluate zone changes to ensure
that future development is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood.
Medium Density Resldential
The Medium Density Residential designation represents an opportunity to provide e range of
housing types to accommodate anticipated residential growth. The increase in population, decline
in average family size, and increased cost of single-family homes have created increased demand
for new housing types. The Lend Use chapter encourages the development of housing types, such
as duplexes, townhouses, and condominiums in existing mufti-family areas and within mixed-use
development in commercial areas.
Multi-famify uses, in large part, are in areas currentiy zoned for muttiple-family developmenG
Zoning will allow densities up to 12 dwelling units per acre in the Medium Density Residential
designation. Opportunities for new development will occur through redevelopment end build-out of
remaining parcels.
Multi-famiiy residential zones should be used as transitional zoning between higher intensity land
uses such as commercial and office, to lower density single family neighborhoods. Additionally,
Medium Density Residenaa) areas should be located near services and high capacity transit
facilities or transit routes.
Residential design guidelines that address design and appearance of multiple-family developments
should be considered. The primary goal of residentIal design guidelines is to develop multiple-family
housing that is reflective of the community's character and appearance.
Adopted Apri125, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 13 of 36
,
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensivs Plan
Nigh Density Residentlal
This designation provides for existing multi-famiiy residential development developed at a density in
excess of 12 units per acre. Additionalfy, High Density Residential (HDR) designated areas are
also located in areas near higher intensity development, such es a City Center. HDR provides
housing opportunities for younger, lower income households in the City who may not yet be able to
afford a home of their own. Moreover, this designation provides housing options for people looking
to 'downsize" from a single family dwelling on an individual lot, or for those known as 'empty-
nesters' whose children have moved out of the household and a large single family home is no
longer needed. Generally, this designation is appropriate for land which is located adjacent to the
arterial street system served by public transit, and is in close proximity to business and commercial
centers.
2.6.2 Commerclal Designatlons
Existing commercial areas are auto-oriented and characterized by one-story low intensity
development. In the future, these areas will become more intensively developed and pedestrian
oriented, and in some designations, accommodate housing. Transforming existing areas into
places where people want to live, shop, and work requires changes. Commercial areas should
contain street fumiture, trees, pedestrian sheiters, well marked crosswalks, and buildings oriented
to and along the street to provide interest and allow easy pedestrian access.
Regional Commercial ; f !
The Regional Commercial
designation encompasses two major
retail areas of the Ctty. It covers the
"strip° retail areas along Sprague ~~.T ' • -
Avenue which includes the ~
automobile dealerships located along
the westem end of the Sprague
Avenue corridor and the "big box' X~~~y
retail area found in the Sullivan Road
area from Sprague Avenue north to ~
the Interstate 90 interchange, and
includes the Valley Mall and Wal- Mart. Regional Commercial allows a
large range of uses. A wide range of developmerrt types, appearance,
ages, function, and scale can be found along Sprague Avenue. Older, single-story developments
provide excellent opportunities for redevelopment.
To create retail areas that are aesthetically and functionalty attractive, revised development
standards should be applied through Regional Commercial zoning, along with the adoption of
Community Design Guidelines which address
design quality, mixed-use, and the integration of
auto, pedestrian, and transit circulation. Site
design, modulation, and setback requirements are
also addressed.
~ i t~~ ~ c E_ - • ~
Community Commercial
.
_ T :
The community commercial classification s
designates areas for retail, service and office
establishments intended to serve several -
neighborhoods. Community Commercial areas
should not be larger than 15-17 acres in size and
should be Iocated as business clusters rather -
than arterial strip commercial development. ~ - ~
Community Commercial centers may be
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 14 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive F.~n
designated through the adoption of the comprehensNe plan, comprehensive plan amendments or
through sub-area planning. Residences jn conjunction with business and/or multifamily
developments may be allowed with performance standards that ensure compatibility. in addition,
light essembly or other unobtrusive uses not traditionally located in commercial zones may be
allowed with appropriate performance standards to ensure compatibility with surrounding uses or
zoning districts.
Neighborhood Commercial
The neighborhood commercial classfication designates areas for small-scale neighborhoods
serving retail end office uses. Neighborhood business areas should not be larger than two acres in
size, and should be located as business clusters rather than arterial strip commercial
developments. Neighborhood business centers may be designated through the adoption of the
comprehensive plan, comprehensive plen amendments or through neighbofiood plans.
Auto-Row Overlay
The City of Spokane Valley is home to several major new eutomobile dealerships. While these
land uses provide a positive economic impact on the community, they can elso have less positive
impacts on the aesthetics of the community. Auto dealerships typically have vast ereas of
pavement to store new and used vehicles for sale. These land uses also have unique
requirements for landscaping and signage. Unlike many commercial uses whose stock in trade is
contained within a building, it is necessary for auto dealerships to have their vehicles clearly visible
from the sVeet. This makes traditional street side landscaping (consisting of law growing shrubs
and bushes, and trees) not viable for these uses.
An oveday designation is being suggested rather than a zoning district because the negative affects
on the non-auto dealer uses in the area will be minimized or eliminated.
2.6.3 City Center
The intent of establishing e City Center in Spokane Valley is to create a higher density, mixed-use
designation where office, retail, govemment uses, and residential uses are concentrated. The City
Center will also be located at one of the major hubs of the region's high capac'ity transit (HC'n
system.
The City Center encourages higher intensity land uses. Traditional city centers are places where
diverse office, retail, and govemment uses are concentrated, as well as cuftural and civic facilities,
community services and
housing. Nationally, many
cities are advocating mixed-use
development in crty center core
areas for a number of reasons,
including:
• Providing new housing,
increasing the range of " housing choices, and
reducing dependency
on the automobile by
bringing work places
and residences into
close proximity;
• Providing retail and
service needs in close
proximity to residential • - - . . ~ _
and employment
centers;
• Improving feasibility of
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 15 of 36
,
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
a development project. The proximity of urban services makes housing projects more
desirable and a nearby source of consumers help make a commercial project more viable.
Residents choose to live in higher density housing for a variety of reasons. First, higher density
housing is more affordable than traditional single family housing. Second, the convenience and
proximity to wortc, needed services and cultural activities is very desirable for many people. Finally,
many people find that they do not need a
large, single family detached house. Given _
their lifestyle, they appreciate the low - ~maintenance and security of higher density -
living. There is a mutualfy supportive - - -
relationship between higher density -
residential uses and commercial and retail ` -
r: r a•
activities. The presence of housing the core
~area also activates the streets in the c'rty .
center, day and night.
Concentrating growth in a specific area also 1_1 p_
supports investment in public infrastnacture
including the regional HCT system. Existing 7,
l ow d ensit y develo pment does not generate
sufficient levels of demand to optimize the
return on investment in transit. Promoting
higher density uses within walking distance of
transit facilities will improve the viability of this
signficant infrastructure investment. Moreover, concentrating the highest density of development in
the City Center, where a significant number of jobs and residences will be within walking distance of
a transit station, helps reduce the dependency on the automobile and improves pedestrian mobility.
The City Center emphasizes pedestrian, bicycle, and transit mobility but will not be unfriendly to the
use of automobiles.
The City Center area will also be the central gathering
place for the community - a place where the whole
community can congregate and celebrate. Accordingly,
the City Center should include an outdoor square, park, or
commons with amenities such as fountains, sculptures,
r- and unique landscaping. Other civic amenities or
buildings including city hall or a performing arts center
I could be grouped around the core area square or park.
The City currently holds an annual Christmas Tree
Lighting Ceremony in the area designated as the City
Center. Additional such events throughout the year will
enhance the feeling of community in Spokane Valley.
An appropriate street network is a critical component of
- z the C' Center. The current network of collector streets
~Y
and arterials, the disjointed grid, and large block sizes
contribute to a lack of identity in the City. The solution is not necessarily to construct wider streets.
Streets become less efficient as the number of lanes increases. Building new streets versus
widening existing streets can be more cost effective, yields greater capac'rty, and will have a more
positive impact on the City Center.
Automobiles are likefy to continue as a dominant mode of transportation for the foreseeable future.
A comprehensive network of streets must be developed to distribute this traffic and create more
driving choices. To the extent possible, the City should connect streets and construct new streets
to form a tighter grid system within the City Center, especially in the core area, by negotiating new
public rights-of-way end building new streets. This `interconnectivity' serves to shorten and
disperse trips, and consequently reduce travel on existing congested arterials.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 16 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Pfan
Pedestrian and bicycle mobility is a vital
part of the future City Center
transportation system. Improvements
for pedestrians and bicyclists should
support increases in trensit services
and promote the development of the ` ~
City Center. As the street system is
developed to better accommodate the
needs of pedestrians and bicyclists, a -z~
network of facilities for people on foot .~,i _
and bikes should be established. IT;
Reducing the size of the street grid, ;;E.:~
improving auto circulation and creating - -
pedestrian linkages through larger
parcels is critical to establish walking
pattems that reduce dependency on the auto. As individual sites are designed and developed to be
more pedestrian fiendly and lmproved pedestrian linkages are provided, the pedestrian system will
handle an increasing share of trips. Special street design standards should be developed for the
City Center. Special standards for extra wide sidewalks (12 to 20 feet in width), pedestrian-scale
street lighting, and additional amenities including benches, trash receptacles, end landscaped
comer treatments should be included.
Transforming the existing commercial core area irtto the proposed City Center is an ambitious task.
It requires a significant transformation from a low-dens'tty, automobile oriented, largely retail area, to
a higher intensity, more pedestrian oriented Mixed-use area. The City Center section of the Plan
acknowledges that the City Center will take some time to develop. The City can facilitate these
changes through a series of small steps taken over time. This is especially true if the steps are
consistent with emerging economic, social and demographic trends. As is the intent of this Plan,
the phasing scenario presented here accounts for the timing of market projections and future
actions.
As noted above, the implementation
strategy is keyed to projected trends
and regional planning goals. Its form
and character, as envisioned in this
' . Plan, are dramatically different from
anything that now exists in the
proposed City Center area. It will
3•tit: teke some time for the development
community to redirect its energy and
investments to produce developmerit
s ' that responds to the direction of the
Plan. The demand for more intense
1 development opportunities in the City
Center is not forecasted within the
next few years. In the meantime, the
""Y " City should discourage continued low-
~ , scale investrnent in this area since
new development will take several
years to be amortized, and will delay the accomplishment of prefeRed development. As regulations
are applied to modest renovations, it should be possible to gain some basic improvements.
However, the City should not expect full implementation of the vision for the City Center until major
property owners in the area are ready to install long-term, major development projects.
The figures (computer generated as part of the TOD Study) at the beginning of this section first
show the existing conditions of the City Center, the second figure illustrating potential
redevelopment of the area over time. The pictures are taken from approximately Farr Road looking
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 17 of 36
. ,
City of Spokane Valiey Comprehensive Plan
east toward the U-City Mall area. The photos do not necessarily indicate specific recommendations
for the area, but are merely an illustration of how a viable City Center could evolve through several
coordinated, incremental steps taken over time.
2.6.4 Office Designation
Spokane Valley has areas of quality
office development. Several
developments within the A, , . -
Argonne/Mullan Couplet, Pines Road, ~ ~ - -
and Evergreen Road corridors
embody good design and are
rePresentative of desired future offce
development. Office development
will provide new job opportunities -
within the community.
This comprehensive plan designation
is intended primarily for office
development with limited retail or
commercial uses. Retail and commercial uses are limited to those that are clearly subordinate to
the primary office use, or the retail function primarily serves the office uses in close proximity to the
retail or commercial use. Primary uses which are representative of this comprehensive plan
category, include medical and dental facilities, education services, insurance, real estate, financial
institutions, design firms, and legal services.
Areas designated as Office can serve a variety of functions. They can stand alone as major
employment centers. They can also act as buffers or transition areas between higher intensity land
uses and lower intensity land uses. For example, Office areas can provide a transition between
industrial or commercial uses and residential areas. Office uses work well for this because they
tend to generate less traffic and noise, operate shorter hours and are often smaller in scale then
industrial or commercial areas.
The Office comprehensive plan
designation will be implemented
through a series of office zoning
districts.
2.6.6 Mixed-use ~T--
The concept of °Mixed-use° hes been on
around for centuries. Prior to the
advent of the automobile and the
proliferation of the road and highway ~ R•~. . _ : ~ ~ _ ; ~
system, Mixed-use was e - " _ ! ~4~,,.
predominant urban form. The
'rediscovery° of this development type may be due in part to the
negative impacts of sprawl, which
have resulted in traffic congestion,
decline in air quality, and ineffcient
use of resources end infrastructure. Mixed-use development has several potential benefits:
• Land and infrastructure resources are used more efficiently;
• Pedestrian-friendly neighbofioods;
• Jobs are located near housing;
• Opportunities to revitalize commercial corridors;
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 18 of 36
C,' ~.f Si`;1:~',_..._ l:''C ;IF'i.it
° C)Ff-'~i~.~~llli~j If''f 11, fCSI'.:lr:riI c:! d CV:.::~;_`(1'~.~i±
• Encourage new housing and innovative retail that is less auto dependen;, anc:
• Compatibility with existing transft access along local corridors.
Mixed-use may be either "horizoMal Mixed-use' or 'vertical Mixed-use.' Horizontai Mixed-use
means that residential, commercial, office and other uses are adjacent to each other typically es
part of an overall master plan for a site. However, not eil projects within a"Mixed-use' designated
area must be Mixed-use to achieve the goals of this plan. For example, a new residential-only
project that is appropriately designed and located adjacent to an older existing commercial building
may help stimulate renovation and reuse. This would be a more likely scenario in the Corridor
Mixed-use area rather than the Mixed-use area.
Vertical Mixed-use means that residential and nonresidential uses are stacked over each other.
Typically, residential uses are placed over ground level retail, offices and/or restaurant uses. This
development type would be more likely to occur in the City Center or in the areas designated as
Mixed-use.
Corridor Mixed-Use
Corridor Mixed-use is intended to enhance travel opt+ons, encourage development of locally senring
commercial uses, mufti-family apartments, lodging and offces along major transportation corridors
identified on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map (Map 2.1). Corridar Mixed-use recognizes the
historical low-intensity, auto-dependent development pattem, and focuses on a pedestrian
orientation with an emphasis on aesthetics and design. The Corridor Mixed-use designation is
primarily used along Sprague Avenue in order to space the areas designated commercial.
Mixed-Use Center
The Mixed-use Center designation would allow for two or more different land uses within
developments under this designation. As described above, Mixed-use developments can be either
vertical or horizontally mixed, and would include employment uses such as office, retail and/or
lodging along with higher density residential uses, and fn some cases community or cuttural
facilities.
Mixed-use developments in this designation are characterized by differing land uses wfiich are
developed pursuant to a coherent, approved plan of development. Compatibility between uses is
achieved through design which integrates certain
physical and funciional features such as _ _ _ - .t •,,~s
transportation systems, pedestrian ways, open
areas or court yards, and common focal points or
amenities. ~ .
2.5.6 Industrial Deslgnations
Providing for industrial land is important for the
economic health of Spokane Valley. Industrial
businesses help drive the local economy and create
an economic mulbplier effect throughout the region.
Providing an adequate supply of usable land with
minimal ernrironmental constraints and infrastructure
in place helps ensure that Spokane Valley will be an
attractive place for industrial businesses to locate and prosper. (See Chapter 7, Economic
Development, for additional policies that encourage recruitment and retention of industrial
business.)
Heavy Industry
Heavy industry is characterized by intense industrial activities which include, but are not limited to,
manufacturing, processing, fabrication, assembfy/disassembly, freight-handling and similar
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 19 of 36
.
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Pian
operations. Heavy industry may have significant noise, odor or aesthetic impacts to surrounding
areas.
Commercial, residential and most recreational uses should not be allowed in areas designated for
heavy industry, except for small-scale ancillary uses serving the industrial area. The conversion of
designated industrial lands to other uses should be limited. Limiting incompatible uses ensures a
competitive advantage in business recruitment by providing adequate industrial land supply,
reducing land use conflicts and preventing inflation of land prices. Moreover, allowing a wide
variety of commercial, retail and other uses in the Industrial areas would be in conflict with other
portions of this Plan related to concentrating major commercial growth in nodes at the intersection
of major streets.
Llght Industry
The Light Industry designation is a planned industrial area with speciaf emphasis and attention
given to aesthetics, landscaping, and intemal and community compatibility. Uses may include high
technology and other low-impact industries. Light Industry areas may incorporate office and
commercial uses as ancillary uses w'rthin an overall plan for the industrial area. Non-fndustrial uses
should be limited and in the majority of cases be associated with permitted industrial uses.
The Light Industry category may serve as a transitional category between heavy industrial areas
and other less intensive land use categories. The category may also serve as a visual buffer for
heavy industrial areas adjacent to aesthetic corridors.
2.6.7 ' Parks/ Open Space
The and Open Space
vrs. ~ rC/
r*esea;9-afeaE- ,
designation is intended to edurvatieR
sin*4r-#2cAities. Tbese-#as+li#4es-~evide-#ef-~e-se~i~
n86dS--,~
,&F
th£►jf--,aF@-~H~l" S0Fed-4f-Eyj3C_'_3ta'. _
'
-pf0t@CtL
parks, open space, and other natural physical assets
'17I"~l~fACJCG'iC~T }T7~f '7 itLi~:Vr
of the community. Vl''~L~ pC ~r1 ~jreaC I ' r{
~
--f--E$&BF#tIaI-RklWI(' --F2rEl, i:lcc_- . .
li?-r.'~.E~3th----dIS£.U6SIAFl o
p!„Pc-P refer-ta Chaptsr 4;-C'apital-Fa6lir;r_--, ' " .
2.6 DeveloQment Revlew Process . •
The Land Use chapter provides the policy foundation `
for implementing zoning and development
regulations. In developing policy conceming future land use regulations, or revisions to existing
regulations, every effort has been made to instill certainty and efficiency in the development
process. State legislation has focused on developing streamlined and timely permit processing.
Through the goals and policies of this Plan, the City will continue to strive to provide an efficient and
timely review system.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 20 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
2.7 Urban Desiqn and Form
In addition to guiding development, the Land Use chapter also guides the quality and character of
the City's future development pattem through goals and policies related to the form, function, and
appearance af the buiit environment These priorities and implementation strategies, related to
quality development, serve and will continue to serve as a basis from which to develop appropriate
implementation measures.
The design of our urban environment has a significant effect on community identrty. Well designed
communities contribute to a healthful, safe and sustainable environment that offers a variety of
opportunities for housing and employment. An attractive and well planned community is invaluable
when recruiting new busjness and industry to an area. Some of the concepts considered include:
• Community appearance, including signs and placement of utilities;
• Neighborhood considerations in the review of development projects;
• Integration and linking of neighborhoods including bicycle and pedestrian facilities;
• The effect of traffic pattems and parking on neighbofiood character;
• Encouragement of high quality development through the appropriate use of planned unit
developments; end
• Consideration for public ert.
2.7.1 Aesthetic Corridors
Aesthetic corridors are intended to protect the visual appeal of Spokane Valley along major
transportation routes entering and exiting the city. Aesthetic corridors provide special design
standards for aesthetics elong major transportation routes to help create a quality image of
Spokane Valley.
Another component of aesthetic corridors is the °gateways' into the city. There are several
entrances into the City of Spokane Valley along major transportation comdors, including Sprague
Avenue, Trent Avenue, State Route 27 end a number of interchanges on Interstate 90. Design
elements and landscaping treatments should denote e sense of arrival into the City, a
neighborhood or special area such as the city center.
2.7.2 Planned Unit Developments
Building flexibility into the subdivision process is important to allow for new concepts and creatlve
site design. Planned unit developments (PUDs) provide the city a tool for allowing flexjbility, while
ensuring a design meets overall health and safety standards, and is consistent with neighborhood
character. PUDs allow for deviations from the typical zoning standards in exchange for designs
that protect the environment, provide usable open space, and exhibit exceptional quality end
design.
2.8 Hlstorical and Cultural Resources
2.8.1 Background
In many ways, Spokane Valley's historic and cuttural resources are similar to our rich natural
resources. Like wetlands, rivers, lakes, streams and other natural resources, historic properties are
a finite and endangered resource. Also like our natural resources, once an historic or
archaeological property is destroyed, it is lost forever. Cultural resources such as historic buildings,
monuments of historic events and archaeological sites are statements of Spokane Valley's identity.
People especially value our authentic, homegrown cultural resources that set us apart frorn other
areas of the state.
Spokane Valley Is the location of severel "Firsts' to occur in the Spokane Region. The first
permanent settler in the Spokane erea was Antoine Plarrte, a retired French-Canadian trapper.
Plante built a cabin near the Spokane River In 1849, from which he operated a small Hudson's Bay
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 21 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Company trading post. Plante also constructed and operated the first ferry on the Spokane RNer.
Other settiers began arriving in this area between 1865 and 1882. "Firsts' to occur in Spokane
Valley include the first settler in 1849, first business and ferry in 1850, the first store and bridge in
1862, the flrst house in 1866 and the first post office in 1867. All of these °firsts" occurred before
the amval in 1873 of James Glover who was considered the 'Father of Spokane.°
A large part of Spokane Valley's identity is derived from its heritage. From the Native Americans
who first established trading centers to the continuing waves of newcomers from around the worfd,
all have left their mark. Cultural resources include historic structures and landscapes engineered
and buitt by man:
a. Historic buitdings - houses, bams, commercial buildings, churches, schools.
b. Historic atructures - bridges, dams, stone fences.
c. Historic districts - a grouping of buildings with related historic character.
d. Historic objects - statues, monuments, sculpture.
e. Landscapes - gardens, parks, urban and rural.
Cuitural resources include properties that were held in spiritual or ceremonial honor or by a cuftural
group or tribe. Cuttural resources include properties which may no longer show evidence of man-
made structures, but retain an historical association with an event or period. Archaeology sites
include such areas as battlefields, campsites, cemeteries, burial sites, rock carvings, pictographs,
trails, village sites, fishing sites, trading sites, religious and ceremonial sites.
2.8.2 Cuttural and Historical Resource Issues
Documenting Cultural Resources
Many historic hames, faRns and sites exemplify the history and
culture of the Spokane Valley area, but proportionalfy few have ~
been written in historic register nominations. Designation
requires owner consent, does not pose undue restrictions to the
property owner, end can be a planning tool for govemment by
identifying significant properties. ~•-,~',L~~.
Archaeologlcal Sites and Security ~ r~~
State laws require the protection of archaeological sites on both
public and private land by directing that the locations of sites be t~:•'
kept confidential within the assigned office because
archaeological sites are highly susceptible to 'treasure hunters and grave robbers.' Existing lists need to be checked to conflrm
that evidence of the sitelbuilding remains, and a better means to
identify end preserve evidence of significant archaeological sites ~ `
..169 -h
is needed.
Cultural resources are deemed importarrt when they are over 50 years old, so identification and
evaluation of them is a constant, ongoing process. Moreover, cuhural resources are perceived as
tess important than other immediate, short-term City programs; therefore, funding and support for
the preservation program is provided on an annual rather than an ongoing basis.
2.8.3 Spokane Valley Hlstoric and Cultural Resources
The Spokane Valley developed as irrigated agricuftural tracts in five and ten-acre lots. The apple
orchards of Otis Orchards were supported by warehouses, packing plants, and box manufacturers.
The apple industry which thrived in the early century was destroyed by killing frost of the 1950s.
Newman Lake supplied the water that irrigated these orchards via the Spokane Canal Company.
The flow control gate at Newman Leke (a great fishing spot) remains as a ruin with its story oniy in
fading memory.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 22 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Open canal ditches, concrete flues, cuitivated fields and apple orchards were part of growing up in
the valley until the late 1950s. A canal ran behind Otis Orchards High School, neither of which now
exists. The picture on page 25 shows an Otis Orchards irrigatiOn canal.
The Opportunity Township Hail was
designed by Opportunity resident and
noted Spokane erchitect C. Harvey Smith _
and constructed in 1912 by Opportunity
builder and businessman C.E. Johnson. f
Buitt as Opportunity's govemment seat, - ~
the Opportunity Township Hall also
served as the area's community hall and
a meeting ptace for various philanthropic ~ P~1 ti~ - ~ ~ i' ,~f' • _
and other organizations including the
i ~ 1 !
Opportunity Moose Lodge, Boy Scouts, Gir1 Scouts, church groups, dance
studios, and wedding parties. The
Opportunity Township Hall is significant
as a rare local example of Spanish-
MediteRanean style architecture and for
its essociation with the early settlement and development of the Spokane Valley and the town o`
Opportunity,
2.9 The Land Use/Transportation Connection
2.9.1 Street Connectivity
Street design can have a significant impact on community development. It is important tha,
neighborhoods be connected is such a manner that cars, bicycles and pedestrians can pass with
ease from one neighbofiood to an adjacent neighborfiood via collectors and arterials. Such a
pattem promotes a sense of community.
All new developments should give special consideration to emergency access routes.
2.9.2 Traffic Calming
Treffie calming can be defined as measures that physically alter the operatianal characteristics of
the roadway in an attempt to slaw down traffic and reduce the negative effects of the automobile.
The theory behind traffic calming is that roads should be muttiuse spaces encouraging social links
within a community and the harmonious interaction of various modes of travel (i.e., walking, cycling,
auto, transit).
2.10 Citizen ParticiQatlon
The City of Spokane Valley adopted a Public Participation Program for the preparation of the
comprehensive plan. This program identified actions the city would take to meet the GMA
requirements of `eariy and continuous' public participation in the development of the city's plan.
Two of the public participation techniques identified in the Public Participation Program is citizen
survey and a series of public meetings hosted by the city's planning commission.
In the spring of 2004, the City hlred Clearwater Research to conduct a statistically valid survey of
Spokane Valley residents on a number of issues. Clearwater Research conducted a telephone
survey with a random sample of 400 Spokane Valley adults. Survey data was collected from March
18 ta April 7, 2004. The majority of respondents (83°r6) indicated they thought Spokane Valley was
headed in the right directlon. However, respondents did identify a number of important issues
facing Spokane Valley. Concems about the economy and planning related matters were among
the top issues respondents identified as tacing the City.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 23 of 36
City of Spokane Velley Comprehensive Plan
2.10.1 City CenteNCommunity Identlty
City Center. Sixty-one percent of
respondents indicated that having a
recognizable downtown or city center was 100% I -
important to the future of Spokane Valley 80% ■ n=395
(figure right). Female respondents,
respondents at lower income levels, and gp% I
respondents residing in one or two ~
person households were most likely to 40% 1b~
report that having e recognizable 20% 11°~6 ~
downtown was important to the future of
Spokane Valley. There was strong 0%
support among respondents for spending v@ry soR,ewnat No~ral somewhd very
public money to create e city center. unimporcar,c unimPonan hportarv ir„pwam
Seventy-four percent of respondents
either somewhat or strongly supported
Spokane Valley officials using public
money to develop a city center. Only two
percent strongly opposed the use of oct,er 6%
public money to create a city center. ■ t~233
Most Ideal Locatlon for a City Center Everygreen and Sprague 12
Over half of the respondents (52%) felt pinas and Spfague 15%
the University City area would be the
most ideal Spokane Valley location for a IVlirabeau Point 18%
city center. Other areas considered
appropriate for the City Center included Universky City area 521~
Mirabeau Point, Pines and Sprague, and ~
Evergreen and Sprague. ~ ~ ~
0% 20°10 40°l0 60% 80% 100°/
Importance of Spokane Valley Having
Community Identtty
~
Communitv Identfir. Only 26% of
respondents thought Spokane Valley had 900%
a distinct identity or something that made I ■ 11=396 ~
it unique. Interestingly, almost the same 80%
percentage of respondents who said
Spokane Valley does not have a 64% community identity (74%), indicated that 41~ 359ro
having a community identity was 40~~
important to the future of Spokane Vatley 20%
(76%). ~
0%
Very SomewhM Neubral Sornenfiat Very
unimportant tmlmportant bnportan! Unpattant
I I
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 24 of 36
,
City of Spokane Velley Comprehensive Plan
Development ot Communlty Identity r
Best Accomplished Through 100% Ph sical or Social Chan es ~ o ~ ■ n=288 T~
Y 9 80 /o
While many respondents (47°rG) fett sp11/o -
community identity could be deveioped ~O .1
through social changes, others 40°~ ' ~
believed physical changes (28%) or a 200/a _
combination of bath physical and
social changes (25%) were the best 0%
means fOf accomplishing th8 Physlcal changes Soclal changes Both Impottant
development of community idenfity. - - - -
2.10.2 Communlty Aesthetica
The typical pattem of development along the major streets of Spokane Valley did not appear to be
of great concem to respondents. Just 22% expressed dissatisfaction with the current type of
development along major streets. Further underscoring the general lack of concem about the
typical pattem of development along major streets, only 23% of respondents indicated adding street
trees and landscaping to major streets should be a high priority for City officials. Lower income
respondents were more ept than higher income respondents to report that making streets
pedestrien-friendly should be a high priortty for City officials.
SuppordOpposition to Development of Small Commerclal Centera Close to Residential
Nelghborhoods
100%
Respondents' opinions (graph right) regarding the development of small gp% ■ n=396 ~
commercial centers close to
residential neighborhoods, were also ' 60% '
sharply divided. Just under half of the
respondents (46°~) were supportive ~ 40a
~0 21°~ ~a~ 15% +
of developing small commercial
centers close to residential 2~o ~o- --41
neighborhoods. 0%
Svongly Somewfiat Neutral Somewtial Strongty
oppose opposo support support
r ~ Priority Level: Stronger Controls on Slgns and Billboards In Spokane Valley
Opinions regarding the priority City 1
officials shou{d place on stronger sign 100% - -
and billboard controls were very ■ n=398
mixed. However, 67% of respondents 80% ' •
indicated that Spokane Val(ey officials sp%
shou{d place a medium or high
priority on stronger sign and billboard 40% 33°~ 33%
control and as such, it is probable that
the majority of residents would be 20%
supportive of stronger billboard
control and sign regulations. p% mmmm"mg
Low priorlty Medfum prloHty Hlgh prloNty
~ - ■
2.10.3 Results of "Unacientific" Survey
During the community meetings held on the comprehensive plan, city staff made available the
survey questiona contained in the c'rty's community survey. Meeting attendees were asked to
complete the survey and either retum it before the end of the meeting, or to complete the survey at
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 25 of 36
Ciry of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
home and mail it to the city. In many cases the responses to the questions were similar to the
responses of the formal survey conducted by Clearwater Research. These question numbers are
right of the survey itself. The following are the results of the 'unscientific' survey:
How Important to the future ot Spokane Valley Is having an area of the City that Is
recognl=ed as the "downtown"? Would you say...?
The responses to this question are very similar to those received 100%
during the formal community ~ n--1 77 ~
survey. The results above reflect 80%
that out of the total responses of ~
177 on this issue, 102 or neariy 6~
58 percent felt that Spokane 33%
Valley having an identiflable 26% 18% 19% ~
downtown or city center was 20%--
either somewhat important or ~ ~
very important. This is compared 1.0
to 40 responses or 22% indicating very somewnat Neither somewnat very
that an identifiable city center was Important Important Important unlmportant unlmporbnt
either somewhat or very nor
unimportant
unimportant.
If you feel a developing a"downtown" is important, whlch of the following areas of Spokane
Valley would be the most Ideal locatlon for a downtown?
Those respondents who indicated that having an identifiable city center overwhelming (73%) feit
that the University City area was the most appropriate location for establishing a city center for
Spokane Valley.
8%
4%
10% -
4%
1
73°~
■ Unlversity City area o Mirabeau Polnt area o Pines &Sprague
o Evergreen & Sprague ■ Other
1
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 26 of 36
C+ty of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
In your opinion, doea Spokane Vatley have an identity or something that makes ft unique?
The resuit of this survey question is somewhat different from the results of the formal community
survey. In the formal survey onty 26°r6 of the respondents feit that the City of Spokane Valley has
an ldentity or something that makes it unique. The results in the graph at the right indicate that a
majority of those surveyed at the community meetings (52%) fett there was something unique ebr,
Spokane Vallel,~
10i
■ n=170
SO%
; D% ,
39% 34%
10%
20% - 139~6
m 5~~ 9°k
U%
Very Somewhat Ne(ther Somewhat Very
important important important nor unimportant unimportant
unimportant
How important to the future of Spokane Valley Is having a"community identity? Would you
say...?
When esked how important to the future of
Spokane Valley is having a distinct n=155 ~
community identity, an overwhelming ea,c
majority of the nespondents (73%) felt it Is {
either somewhat important or very importaRt 6°~'~ 48x azx
that Spokane Valley have a distinct identity. 4WI#
This is consistent with the results of the
formai community survey where 76°r6 of 2WA
respondents felt it is importarrt for the city to
have a community identity. °'ti No Yes
Would development of a"community identity" best be accomplished ihrough physical
changes, such as the development ot a clty center or the building of gateways at the ma]or
points of entry into the city, or through sociaf changes, such as more communfty events Ifke
Vatleyfest? ,
toax ~
When asked what types of changes n=150
would be needed to develop a community 80%
iden#ity, e majortty (57%) felt that both 60% 67%
social and physical changes woufd be
necessary to eccompiish developing an 40x
identity for the city. This is somewhat ~x
Xl% ~ax
different than the formal survey where -
only 26% of the respondents feit that both ox
physical and social changes were equally P►►ysical cnang.: s«,,i cwnges eoth crangea
important io develop the city's identity. rqually Importsnt
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 27 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Ptan
Do you consider adding atreet trees and landscaping to maJor streets In Spokane Valiey a
high, medium, or low priority for city offlclala?
In terms of community aesthetics, a majority of the respondents (59%) feit ioox ,
that edding street trees and ■ nat 66 ~
landscaping to the major streets in ~
the city should be either a medium or W%
high priority for city officials. This 41% 41%
resuit was identical to the result of the 40%
city's formal community survey where 18%
59% of respondents felt this should ~
be either a medium or high priority for ox
the city. Low Prlortty Medlum Prlaity Hlgh Prlorfty
2.11 Goals and Policies
Residential Goals & Policies
Goal LUG-1 Preserve and protect the character of Spokane Valley's residential
neighborhoods.
Policies
LUP-1.1 Maintain and protect the character of existing and future residential
neighborhoods through the development and ertforcement of the City's land use
regulations and joint planning.
LUP-1.2 Protect residential areas firom impacts of adjacent non-residential uses andlor
higher intensity uses through the development and enforcement of the City's land
use regulations and joint planning.
LUP-1.3 Review and revise as necessary, existing land use regulations to provide for
innovation and flexibility in the design of new residential developments,
accessory dwelling units and in-fill development.
LUP-1.4 Encourage the development of transportation routes and facilities to serve
residential neighborhoods. Special attention should be given to pedestrian
circulation.
LUP-1.5 Encourage the development of parks and the dedication of open space in and
adjacent to residential areas. Open space dedication shall be proportionate to
the size of the development.
LUP-1.6 Preserve site characteristics that enhance residential development (trees, bodies
of water, vistas, and similar features) using site planning techniques such as
clustering, planned unit developments, transfer of development rights and lot size
averaging.
LUP-1.7 Allow zone changes within the Low Density Residential category only when
specific criteria are met. Criteria may include:
• Substantial changes within zone change area.
• Clear mapping errors.
• Adequate facilities end senrices (e.g. sewer, water capacity).
• Consistency with densities in the vicinity of the zone change.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 28 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Goal LUC3-2 Encourage a wide range of housing types and densitles
commensurate wfth the communfty's needs and preferences.
Policies
LUP-2.1 Allow and encourage a variety of housing types in designated Mixed-use areas,
especiaily in the City Center area.
LUP-2.2 Use design and performance standards for residential developments to achieve
integration in commercial and Maed-use developments. Performance standards
should focus on scale, appearance, and compatibility. Encourage variations in
facades and rooflines to edd character and interest to mufti-family developments.
LUP-2.3 Encourage the development of transportation routes and facilities to serve
residential neighbofioods. Special attention should be given to walking, biking
and transit uses.
LUP-2.4 Residential development should be designed to provide privacy and common
open space. Open space areas shall be proportionate to the size of the
residential development.
LUP-2.5 Consider special development techniques (e.g., zero lot lines, lot size everaging,
and planned unit developments) in single-famify areas, provided they resuit in
residential development consistent wfth the quality and character of existing
neighbofioods.
Commerclal Goats & Policles
Goal LUG-3 Transform varlous commerclal buslness areas into vltal, attractive,
easlly accessible mixed use areas that appeal to Investors,
consumers and resldents and enhance the community lmage and
economfc vitality.
Policies
LUP-3.1 Encourage transformation of Sprague Avenue RegionaV Community Commercial
corridor into e quality mixed-use retail area. Retail development along the
corridor, exclusive of the City Center, should be concentrated at arterial
intersections and designed to integrate auto, pedestrian, and transit circulation.
Integration of public amenities and open space into retail and affice development
should also be encouraged.
LUP-3.2 Encourage targe bulk retailers to locate in the designated Regional Commercial
nodes around arterial intersections.
Goal LUG-4 Provide neighborhood and community scale retail centers for the
City's neighborhoods.
Policies
LUP-4.1 Integrate retail developments into surrounding residential areas with attention to
quality design and function.
LUP-4.2 Encourage pedestrian and bicycle eccess to neighborhood shopping and
services.
LUP-4.3 Encourage retail and personal services to group together within planned centers
to allow for ease of pedestdan movement.
LUP-4.4 Encourage Mixed-use residential and commercial and office development in
Neighborhood Commercial designations where compatibility wfth nearby uses
can be demonstrated.
AdoPted APril 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use I
Page 29 of 36
City of Spokane Vailey Comprehensive Plan
LUP-4.5 Ensure compatibility between mixed-use developments and residential areas by
regulating height, scale, setbacks, and buffers.
LUP-4.6 Develop community design guidelines to promote common open space, public
art, and plazas in commercial and office developments.
LUP-4.7 Develop design guidelines that encourage quality design and pedestrian end
vehicle circulation in commercial, office and Mixed•use developments.
LUP-4.8 Develop design guidelines to encourage oommercial development to locate along
the sVeet edge (where deemed appropriate) to provide pedestrian street access.
LUP-4.9 Identify and designete streets where on-street parfcing can be safely provided
without unduiy slowing traffic flow or jeopardizing traffic safety.
LUP-4.10 May provide incentives to encourage developers to include housing in mixed-use
projects.
Goal LUG-6 Identify appropriate locations for the Auto Row Overlay designation.
Policies
LUP-5.1 Identify other appropriate automobile related uses within the Auto Raw Overlay
designation that are complementary to automobile dealerships.
LUP-5.2 Develop appropriate development standards for permitted uses within the Auto
Row Overlay designated area.
City Center
Goal LUG-6 Create an identifiable City Center that serves as the social, cultural,
and economic focus of the City of Spokane Valley.
Policies
LUP-6.1 Define a Ciry Center with distinct boundaries, unique building types, and special
features.
LUP-6.2 Strengthen existing connections of the City Center area to the region's high I
capacity transit system.
LUP-6.3 Focus on improving the existing character and image of the C+ty Center area
through appropriate development regulations and design standards.
LUP-6.4 Develop land use regulations that allow higher intensity development in the City
Center including, but not limited to, taller buildings, increased floor area ratios
(FAR) and permitted uses.
LUP-6.5 Coordinate with urban service providers to ensure sufficient capacity is evailable
for anticlpated development.
LUP-6.6 Allow for a variety of uses and mixed-use development within buildings or
complexes. Ensure that mixed-use development complements and enhances
the character of the surrounding residential and commercial area.
LUP-6.7 The City should aiways consider City Center sites regarding potential civic and
cuKural uses the City develops, such as a City Hall.
LUP-6.8 Provide incentives to attract cultural end civic uses to the City Center over which
the City does not have direct control, such es libraries or recreation facilities.
LUP-6.9 Develop land use regulations that encourage higher density residential uses on
the periphery of the City Center area in close proximity to high capacity transit.
High density housing should be accompanied by residentialiy oriented retail end
senrice uses.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 30 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive P1an
LUP-6.10 Provide amenities such as community services, parics and public spaces to meet
the residential needs in the City Center.
LUP-6.11 Provide en effective transition befinreen the periphery of the City Center end
nearby lower density residential developmerrt.
Goal LUG-7 Provide a balanced transportation network that accommodatea
publlc transportatlon, hlgh occupancy vehlcles, pedeatrians,
bicycllsts, automobiles and integrated parking.
Policies
LUP-7.1 Improve traffic circulation around and through the City Center by extending the
street network and creating smaller blocks.
LUP-7.2 Encourage pedestrian end bicycle circulation by providing public sidewalks,
sireet trees, street fumiture and other emenities.
LUP-7.3 Require clear and safe pedestrian paths to enhance the pedestrian network.
LUP-7.4 Connect the main entry of buildings to public sidewalks by an identifiable
walkway.
LUP-7.5 Allow for on-street parking on the intemal City Center street network.
LUP-7.6 Encourage transit use by improving pedestrian end bicycle linkages to the
exisbng and future transit system.
Office Goals & Polictes
Goal LUG-8 Create appropriate development standards for Office designated
areas.
Policies
LUP-8.1 Allow commercial, residential and recreational uses in conjunction with permitted
uses in Office designated areas.
LUP-8.2 Integrate sidewalks, bike lanes, landscaping, and area lighting in office areas to
provide e safe and attractive working environment.
Mlxed-use Goals & Pollcles
Goal LUG-9 Encourage the development of Mlxed-use areas that foster
community identity and are designed to support pedestrian, bicycle
and regfonal transft
Policies
LUP-9.1 The characteristics of e Mixed-use area should include:
• Housing and employment densities to support regional transit service;
• Public transit connections;
• Safe, attractive trensit stops and pedestrian and bicycle ways;
• Buildings that frorit on wide sidewalks with attractive landscaping, benches
and frequent bus stops;
• Multi-story buildings oriented to the street rether than parking lots; and
• Parking space located behind or to the side of buildings or in parking
structures.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 31 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
LUP-9.2 The mix of land uses allowed in either the Corridor Mixed-use or Mixed-use
Center designation should include:
• A variety of housing types including apartments, condominiums, town
houses, two-family and single family dwellings on small lots;
• A full range of retail goods and services including grocery stores,
theaters/entertainment, restaurants, personal services and speciafty shops;
• Public/quasi-public uses and/or open space;
• Professional Office and other employment oriented uses; and
• Commercial uses that require large land areas but have law employment
density and are auto-dependant, such as lumber yards, plant nurseries,
warehouses, and auto dealerships, should be prohibited from either Mixed-
use category.
Industrial Goals & Policies
Goal LUG-10 Provlde for the development of well-planned industrial areas and
ensure the Iong-term holdfng of appropriate land In parcel sizes
adequate to allow for future development as industrial uses.
Policies
LUP-10.1 Plan capital facility expenditures to assist the development of lands designated
for industrial uses.
LUP-10.2 Encoursge a diverse array of industries to locate in Spokane Valley.
LUP-10.3 Encourage shared-use parking, pedestrian access and transit incentive programs
in industrial development projects.
Goal LUG-11 A variety of strategically located heavy Industrlal areas should be
designated and protected from conflicting land uses.
Policies
LUP-11.1 Commercial, residential and recreational uses should be limited or not allowed in
areas designated for industry, except for small-scale ancillary commercial end
recreational uses intended to primarily serve the industrial area.
LUP-11.2 Conversion of designated industrial lands to other uses should be strictly limited
to ensure an adequate land supply.
LUP-11.3 Provide appropriate buffering, landscaping and other development standards for
industrial areas.
LUP-11.4 Retail outlets shall be allawed for industrial businesses that manufacture and/or
assemble products on-site.
Goal LUG•12 Designate and protect a varlety of strategically located light industry
areas.
Policies
LUP-12.1 Commercial, residential end recreational uses shall be limited or not allowed in
areas designated for light indusUy except for small-scale ancillary commercial
and recreational uses primarily to serve the industrial area.
LUP-12.2 Light industry areas shall include lighting, sidewalks, bike lanes and landscaping
to provide a safe and attractive working environment.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 32 of 36
.
City of Spokane Velley Comprehensive Plan
LUP-12.3 Reteil outiets shall be allawed for fndustdal businesses that manufacture andlor
assemble products on-site.
Development Review Goats 8 Policies
C3oal LUG•13 Develop and maintain an efficient and timely development revlew
proceas.
Policies
LUP-13.1 Maxim¢e efficiency of the development review process by continuously
evaluating the permitting process and modifying as appropriate.
LUP-13.2 Assist developers with proposals by continuing to offer pre-application meetings
in order to produce projects that will be reviewed efficiently.
Urban Deaign and Form Goals & Policles
Goals LUG-14 Improve the appearance and functlon of the built environment.
Policies
LUP-14.1 Use performance and community design standards to maintaln neighbofiood
character, achieve e greater range of housing options, and to create attractive
and desirable commercial and office developments.
LUP-14.2 Adopt specific regulations for designated aesthetic corridors that:
• Provide incentives for aesthetic design;
• Require landscaping buffers edjacent to roadways;
• Limit sign height and size;
• Provide perFormance standards to adequately screen intensive land uses
that have exterior clutter such as outdoor storage, exterior heavy equipment
and/or exterior fabricationlassembly.
• Prohibit off-premise signage and billboards.
LUP-14.3 Establish standards for the scale and intensity of commercial, retail and industrial
signage that protect views end minimize signage clutter while allowing adequate
business identification.
LUP-14.4 Establish a"cap and replace° system for billboards.
LUP-14.5 Designete aesthetic corridors along major transportation routes to provide a
positive image of Spokane Valley. Aesthetic corridors shall be located along the
following routes:
• State Route 27 from 1e south to 32"d and Mansfield to Trent;
• Appleway Boulevard (south side from Park to Dishman Mica);
• Mirabeau Parkway from Pines to Indiana;
• Dishman Mica Road from S'h Avenue, south to City limits
• 32"d Ave. within the City limits
• Appleway Btvd. from Barker to Hodges
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 33 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Pian
Historic and Cultural Resources Goals & Policies
Goal LUG- 6 Identify and protect archeological and histoNc sites and structures.
Policies
LUP-15.1 Continually identify and evaluate archaeological end historic sites to determine
which should be preserved.
LUP-15.2 Link cufturai resource presenration with local economic development strategies.
LUP-15.3 Establish and maintain relations with Native American tribes for the preservation
of archaeological sites and traditional cuftural properties.
Land UselTransportation Connectlon Goals & Poltcies
Goal LUG-16 Provlde a street system that connects nelghborhoods.
Policies
LUP-16.1 Encourage new developments, including multifamily projects, to be arranged in a
pattem of connecting streets and blocks to allow people to get around easily by
foot, bicycle, bus or car.
LUP-16.2 Develop street, pedestrian path and bike path standards that contribute to a
system of fully connected routes.
LUP-16.3 Require adequate emergency evacuation routes prior to approving new
development or redevelopment.
Joint Planning Goals and Policies
Goal LUG-17 The City of Spokane Valley should continue to coordlnate wlth
Spokane County and neighboring cities for adjacent urban growth
areas.
Policies
LUP-17.1 The City should coordinate with Spokane County to ensure appropriate service
provision and (and development prior to City annexation. Methads to allow for
coordination may include, but are not limited to, execution of an interlocal
agreement between the City of Spokane Valley and Spokane County to:
• Establish guidelines for development plan review, impact fees and SEPA
mitigation; and
• Define service delivery rssponsibilities, level of service standards and capital
facility implementation consistent with the goals end policies of this Plan.
LUP-17.2 Through regional planning efforts, the City and County should ensure that
pianning is compatible with the Cities of Spokane and Liberty Lake.
LUP-17.3 The City should continue coordinated planning efforts between Spokane County,
appropriate fire districts, school districts and water service providers to assure
managed growth in urban growth ereas.
I
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Lend Use
Page 34 of 36
1
City of Spakane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Potential Annexation Area C3oals and Policies
C3oal LUG-18 Identify Potential Annexation Areas for the City of Spokane Valley
that are consistent with the Spokane County reglonal urban growth
area boundary.
Policies
LUP-18.1 Wthin the existing urban growth area, identify potential annexation areas that are
corrtiguous to the c'rty limits end not assigned to another city.
LUP-18.2 Coordinate with adjacent cities and Spokane County to review and update the
regiona) urban growth area boundary consistent with the Countywide Planning
Policies and RCW 36.70.
LUP-18.3 Propose changes to the regional urban growth area boundary necessary to
accommodate Spokane Valley's 20 year population allocation.
LUP-18.4 The City will not accept requests to annex unincorporated territory located
outside the designated urban grawth area.
LLJiJ tti-i- U-i}F&U8--4
LUP-18.65 Complete necessary capital facilities planning for eny newly proposed urban
growth areas in accordance with the Countywide Planning Policies.
Goal LUG-19 Collaborate with adjacent cities, Spokane County, and affected
residents
Policies
LUP-19.1 Pursue interlocal a4reements with Spokane County to support collaborative ioint
plannina within potential annexation areas to ensure consistent development
LUP-19.2 Inform affected residents, propertv owners. and businesses in the annexation
process.
LUP-19.3 Include lanauaQe in an interlocal a4reement utilizina the tool of annexation, prior
to urban develaament. to control the type, qualitv, and location of development in
ootential annexation areas.
LUP-19.4 Coordinate with Suokane County to work with affected neiahborhoods u~on
anneXetion to rovide a smooth transition from Spokane Countv to the Citv of
Sqokane Vallev administration.
Goal LUG-20 Promote orderly qrowth wfthin potential annexation areas
Policies
LUP-20.1 Perform a fiscal analysis and provide a service plan for all areas proposed for
annexation.
Lup-20.2 Incorporate potential annexation areas in the Caaital Facilities Pian includinq
rp oqOSed locations for new capital facitities.
LUP-20.3 Strive to retain neiqhborhood inteq_rity in adjustina potential annexation areas
boundaries,
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 35 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Goal LUG-21 Develop an annexation Qrocess for potential annexation areas
Policies
LUP-21.1 Evaluate annexations within the Qotential annexation areas based on the
followinQ criteria:
• The City's ability, either in house.by contract. or by_spec+al u~pr ose district.,
to provide public services at the Citv's adopted level of service
• The annexation boundanv should provide a contiQUOUS and reQUlar boundarv.
with current Citv limits
. The annexation boundarv, where appropriate should use physical
boundaries. includinq but not limited to. bodies of water, existin4 or future
ric ht-of-way, roads. and topoQraphv
• Assessment of staff time and exaense involved in processinq the annexation
re uest
• Review riaht-of-wav issues prior to defininp boundaries of individual
annexations to determine loQical inclusions or exclusions
. The annexation boundarv, where approariate, should adiust anv impractical
or irreqular boundaries
• When the aroposed annexation is located in the vicinitv of a public facilitv,
the Citv should evaluate the feasibilitv of modifvinQ the annexation boundarv
to include the public facilitv
LUP-21.2 Process annexations in accordance with State annexation laws in a timely and
efficient manner.
LUP-21.3 Generallv, the Citv of Spokane Vallev prefers the Petition Method of Annexation.
LUP-21.4 Ensure that newlv annexed territorv accepts its eauitable share of the Citv's
bonded indebtedness.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 36 of 36
City of Spokene Valley Camprehensive Plan
CHAPTER 4- CAPITAL FACILITIES AND PUBLIC SERVICES
4.0 Introductfon
The Growth Management Act (GMA) requires new development to be directed to areas that either
cuRently have adequate public facilibes and services, or to areas where facilfties and services can
be delivered within the 20-year time freme of the Spokane Vailey Comprehensive Plan (SVCP).
Facilities and services that ere required for new development must be adequate and evailable at
adopted levels of service (LOS). Locally established LOSs help to define and contribute to
Spokane Valley's quality of life.
4.1 Plannin Context
This section provides a review of the policy directives included in the State's Growth Management
Act (GMA) and the Countywide Planning Policies relating to capital facilities planning.
4.1.1 Growth Management Act
The GMA refers to capital facilfties planning in two (2) of the thirteen (13) statewide planning goals.
The two relevant goals are:
• Urban Growth. Encourage development in urban areas where edequate public facilfties
and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner.
• Public facilfties and services. Ensure that those public facilifies and senrices necessary to
support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the
development is available for occupancy and use wfthout decreasing current service levels
below localiy established minimum standards.
More specifically, the GMA mandates that the City prepare a capital facilfties plan which contains
the following components:
• An inventory of existing facilities owned by public entities, showing the locations
and capacities of the facilities.
• A forecast of the future needs for such facilities.
• The proposed locations end capacities of expanded or new facilities.
• At least a six-year financing plan that will finance such facilibes and clearty identify
sources of public money for such purposes.
• A requirement to reassess the Land Use chepter if probable funding falls short.
4.1.2 Countywlde Planning Policies
The Countywide Planning Policies (CWPP), originally adopted in 1994, contain a number of goals
and policies regarding capital facilfties and the provision of urban services. Those CWPP relevant
to capital facilfties planning are as follows:'
Policy Toplc 1- Urban Growth Areas (UGAs)
Urban Growth Area Designatlon Process for New Incorporated Cities:
1. The Steering Committee of Elected Officials will assign new incorporated cities an interim
population allocation based on the Office of Financial Management population forecasts
and previous allocations to the former unincorporated area.
' Note to reader. The following poUcles are numbered eccording to the pdfcy number In the CWPPs, resulting In non-sequentlal
numbering In thls document.
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital FecilMes
Page 1 of 58
_ ,
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
2. The new c'rty will conduct a land capacity analysis using the Land Quantity Methodology
adopted by the Steering Committee.
a. The city will first determine land capac'ity inside its limits and then will examine the
capacity of unincorporated UGAs adjoining the jurisdiction's boundary.
3. The new city will develop the Urban Growth Area proposal as part of its comprehensive
planning process.
a. The proposed UGA shall be presented to the Steering Committee at a public meeting.
The new city must justify its UGA proposal, showing how the interim populabon
allocation will be accommodated.
b. The city must show how the area will be providing a full range of urban services within
the 20-year time frame of the comprehensive plan.
c. All Urban Growth Areas lying adjacent to the new city should be enalyzed and either
proposed as the jurisdiction's UGA, a Joint Planning Area (JPA), or proposed to be
removed from the UGA and converted to rural land.
d. The c'rty will show its work by presenting its land capacity analysis, urban service
analysis and other information as appropriate.
4. The Steering Committee will conduct a public hearing on the population allocation and the
Urban Growth Area end/or the (or Joint Planning Area) proposal. The Steering Committee
will vote on the proposal and will forward a recommendation to the Board of County
Commissioners via minutes from the public hearing.
5. The Board of County Commissioners may conduct a public hearing on the proposed Urban
Grawth Area, andlor the proposed Joint Planning Area, and population allocation. After the
hearing, the Board will approve and adopt, modify or retum the proposal to the city for
revision andJor adoption.
a. The new city shall include the approved or modified UGA and/or the JPA in its
comprehensive plan.
b. The new UGA or JPA will become an amendment to the Spokane County
Comprehensive Plan by incorporation.
Policies
1. Urban Growth should be located first in areas already characterized by urban growth that
have existing public facility and service capacities to serve such development, and second
in areas already characterized by urban growth that will be served by a combination of both
existing public facilities and services and any additional needed public facilities and
services that are provided by either public or private sources. Further, it is appropriate that
urban govemment services be provided by cities, and urban government services should
not be provided in rural areas.
Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) include all lands within existing cities, including cities in rural areas.
2. The determination and proposal of an Urban Growth Area (UGA) outside existing
incorporated limits shall be based on a jurisdiction's ability to provide urban govemmental
services at the minimum level of service specified by the Steering Committee. Jurisdictions
may establish higher level of service standards in their respective comprehensive plans.
5. Each jurisdiction shall submit proposed interim and final Urban Growth Area (UGA)
boundaries to the Steering Committee, including:
a. Justification in the form of its land capacity analysis and the ability to provide urban
govemmental services and public facilities;
b. The amount of population growth which could be accommodated and the analytical
basis by which this growth figure was derived; and
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 2 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Pian
c. How much unincorporated land is required to accommodate growth, including maps
indicating the additional areas?
8. Each municipality must document its ability to provide urban govemmental senrices within
its existing city limits prior to the designation of en Urban Growth Area (UGA) designation
outside of existing city limits. To propose an Urban Grawth Area (UGA) designation
outside of their existing c'rty limits, municipalities must provide a full range of urban
govemmental services based on each municipality's capital facilities element of their
Comprehensive Plan.
11. Each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan shall, at a minimum, demonstrate the ability to
provide necessary domestic water, sanitary sewer and transportation improvements
concurrent with development. Small municipalities (those with a population of 1,000 or
less) may utilize approved interim ground disposal methods inside of Urban Growth Areas
(UGAs) until such time as full sanitary sewer senrices can be made available. Each
jurisdiction should consider long-term service and maintenance requirements when
delineating Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) end making future land use decisions.
12. Within Urban Growth Areas (UGAs), new developments should be responsible for
infrastructure improvements attributable to those developments.
18. Extension of urban governmental services outside of Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) should
only be provided to maintain existing levels of service in ewsting urban like areas ar for
health and safety reasons, provided that such extensions are not an inducement to growth.
Policy Topic 2- Jolnt Planning withln Urban C3rowth Areas
Policies
1. The joint planning process should:
a. Include ell judsdicbons adjacent to the Urban Growth Area and Special Purpose
Districts that will be affected by the eventual transference of governmental services.
b. Recognize that Urban Growth Areas are potential annexation areas for cities.
c. Ensure a smooth transition of services amongst existing municipalities and emerging
communities.
d. Ensure the ability to expand urban govemmental services and avoid land use barriers
to expansion; and
e. Resolve issues regarding how zoning, subdivision and other land use approvals in
designated joint planning areas will be coordinated.
2. Joint planning may be eccomplished pursuant to an interiocal agreement entered into
between and/or among jurisdictions and/or special purpose districts.
Polfcy Toplc 3- Promotfon of ConUguous and Orderly Development and Provtslon of Urban
Services
Policies
1. Esch jurisdiction shall include policies in its comprehensive plan to address how urban
development will be managed to promote efficiency in the use of land and the provision of
urban govemmental services and public facilities. The Steering Committee shall specify
regional minimum level of senrice standards (see Table 4.1) for urban govemmental
services with the exception of police proteckion within Urban Growth Areas (UGAs). Local
judsdicbons may choose higher standards. In its comprehensive plan, each jurisdiction
shall include, but not be limited to, level of service standards for.
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 3 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
a. fire protection; b. police protection;
c. parks and libraries d. libraries;
e. public sewer, f. public water,
g. solid waste disposal and recycling; h. transportation;
i. schools.
Table 4.1 Reglonal Level of 3ervlcs Standards
FACILITY LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD (LOS)
Domestic Water Supply - Minimum Levels of Senrlce for storage capecity and flow shall be
conslstertt wfth the Washington State Deparbnent of Health requlrementa and the Spokane County
Coordinated Water System Plan requlrements (where applicable).
System Deaign - Mlnlmum Levels of Servlce for plpe slzing, flow rate, and systematlc grid
Domestlc Water development shall be conslstertt wlth the WaaMngton State DepartmeM of Health reqLdremerrts
and the Coordlnated Water System Plan requlrementa (where appllcable).
Fire Flow - Flra flow rate and duration as well es flre hydrant spedficetlons artd spadng shall be
consiatent wfth local flre authoriry requlrements or the Flre Code, whlch ever Is more stringent.
Incorporated areea will be provided wlth westewater cdledion and transpori systems In
aocordance wftfi the adopted aewer concuRency reQulrements of the Jurisdidion. Unincorporated
urban growth areaa wlll be provlded with wastewater collectlon end trartaport aystems In
aaordance with the requirements for sewer wnarrency ss set forth in Spokane County/s
Development Regulatlons. Collectlon systema and transport systema wlll be deslgned for peak
flow condibons so that overflaws, badaps, and discharges from the system do not oxur under
normal operating situations. Specific design cxiteria shall conform to the requ(rements of the
YVashington State Department of Ecology and locel regufations. Wastewater colledjon and
trarzsport systerrrs will convey wastewatef to centralized wastewater trestment facilries.
Centrelized wastewater VeaVnent and effluent disposal facilities witl be planned, designed, end
Sanltary Sewef construded to provlde etfluenl that does not edverseiy Impad the quality of surface or ground
water of the Stste of Washington. Planning end desfgn for wastewater treatment end effluent
disposal fadlftiea wlll be based on 20 year proJections of populatlon growth end current water
quallty cdteria as estabtished by the Washington State Department of Ecology.
(Centrallzad wastewater tr+eatment /aG!ldes shall be a part of a sewage system owned or operated
by a clry, town, munlclpal corporatlen, county, polldcal subdlvls/on of the atnte or other approved
ownershlp consJsting of a oolledlan system and necessary hunks, pumping fecllltfes arrd means of
Tinal beatment and dlsposal and approved or under permlt from tht Washington State Department
of Ecology.)
Transportation Malntain travel corridor time as establtshed by Spokane Regional Transportation Coundl.
Flooding of property oudslde deslgnated drafnage-ways, de-fado drainage-ways, easements, flood
zones or other approved dralnage fadltUea, during the deslgn predpftabon or nmoft event
preacrlbed in the standards of the govem)ng locel agency or Jurladidion, shall be prevented wtthln
the reaaonable probability aftorded by such standards. Impact to bulldings and eccessory
Stormwater Sw~res shell be avoided to the max(mum extent pradicable by evaluaUng the effects of a 100-
yeer rain event, and fmplementing measures to ensure that the runaft attendant to such eveM la
directed away from such buildings and accessory sUucaues. Arry stommn►etef discharge to surface
or ground waters must meet federel, state and local requiremertts for water quelity treatment,
stormwffier runofl and 1nfiIbaUon.
Each Jurisdictlon shall spedfy in its ComprehensIve Plan a levet of polce proteetlon that addresses
Law Enio~cement the safety of its dtizens.
Llbraries Each Jurtsdletlon wlll specify its own level of service.
parks Each Jurisdictlon wfll apedfy Rs own level of servlce.
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 4 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Table 4.1 Regional Level of Servlu Standards
FACILtTY LEVEL OF BERViCE STANDARO (LOS)
Sdid waste processing wfil meet Fedetal end State rtgulatlons, induding maintaining arty requlred
Solld Weste fadiities lioensea.
Each Jurisdidlon wffhin the non-attalnment area shaA develop end use a street deaning plan,
coordinsUng with Spokane Courrty Alr PolluUon Corttrol Authority (SCAPCA) es the overslgM
agency, to meet mandated PardcxAate Matter dust standards. Each Jurtadidion's atreet deaning
plan will desaibe thc programs and methods to be used to reduce partlculate mattef emhsions
trom peved stsfeces. Each pisn shed eddress but not be lmited to the fdlawing: 1) Street
SVeet Cleaning sweepin9 frequency and techndogy to be emplayed. 2) Factora for deterrriining when and where
to Initiate street sweeping tollawing a aanding event, wfth the goals of expeditious removal wt►en
safety end mobility requirementa have been satisfied. 3) Sanding rodudion goal. 4) Sanding
materiala spedffcations to be emplayed. 5) LocaUorss, applicatlon ratea and dreumstances tor use
of dhernical de-icers and other sanding aftematives. 8) IdenMlcaUon of prfortty roadweya (over
15,000 avefage daily traAic count).
Jurisdidiona wtthin the Pu6tic Trenait Benefft Area (PTBA) shall have pollcies conslstent wfth the
Public Transft level of swvlce edopted by the Spokane Transit Authaity Board of Directors.
Urben ereas )uriadictlona (n exceaa of 5.000 population, or once a populaUon of 6,000 peraons ta
achieved, shatl be aerved by Flre Disbid with at least a(Washington Survaey and Reting 8ureau of
Insunance Servlces Ofl9ce) Class 8 Inswance Radng or better. For the purposes of GMA minimum
Levels of Service, Gasa 6 or better shatl be based on the ISO Greding Sdhedule for muNdpal fire
protection, 1974 edftlon, as amended, by using the fire dlatricL flre service communication, snd fire
safety control portlons of the grading schedule. The total defidency polnts identified in these
portlons of tlie ISO or Washington Sun+ey and Retlng Bureau achedule shaA not exceed 1,830
Fire and Emergency p°ints• al jufisaicUor,s, regard{ess of size, shatl ensure that new development has a Flre Fiow and
hydrant placement per the Intematlonal Flre Code adopted by thet Judsdiction. Urban areaa must
Services be wfthin 6 rosd mlles of an operebng flre station that provfdes saMce with a'Class A` pumper,
unless atrudures ere equlpped vuith flre sprinkler(s) that are rated In acoordance with the ediitlon of
the IrttemaUonal Fire Code adopted by the )urlsdictlon, and Is located wfthin b road miles of an
operating flr8 statlon that provides setvice wfth a Ciasa 'A' rsted pumper. Urben ereas shap be
senred by a state aertKied basic life support (BLS) agency. Urban areas ahouid be served by an
operating basic life saving tmk wFthtn b mfles; and an operatfng advanced Ufe support unit within 6
miles or 10 minutes response Ume for those jurisdicUons wRh urben areas in exoess of 6,000 in
popWation; end baslc life support end advancxd tffe aupport transpon service.
Public Schools To be determined by Indhrldual school disUict CFP.
2. Each jurisdiction and other providers of public services should use compatible information
technologies to monitor demand for urban govemmental and regional services and the
efficiency of planning and services delivery.
3. Each jurisdiction shall include policies in its comprehensive plan to ensure that obstructions
to regional transportation or utility corridors are not created. In addition, each jurisdiction
should include policies in its comprehensive plan to ensure sustainable growth beyond the
20-year planning hor¢on.
7. Each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan shall include, at a minimum, the following policies to
address adequate fire protection.
a. Limit growth to areas served by a fire protection district or within the corporate limits of
a c'cty providing its own fire department.
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2000 Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 5 of 58
City of Spokane Vailey Comprehensive Plan
b. Commercial and residential subdivisions and developments and residential planned
unit developments shall include the provision for road access adequate for residents,
fire department or district ingress/egress and water suppfy for fire protection.
c. Development in forested areas must provide defensible space between st►vcture and
adjacent fuels and require that fire-rated roofing materials be used.
9. Wellhead protection plans should be coordinated with water purveyors and implemented by
local jurisdictions. The Steering Committee shall pursue strategies for regional (to include
Idaho jurisdictions) water resource management, which sustain projected growth rates and
protect the environment.
10. Each jurisdiction shall include provisions in its comprehensive plan for the distribution of
essential public facilities.
13. Each jurisdiction shall plan for growth within Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) which uses land
efficiency, edds certainty to capital facilities planning and allows tlmely and coordinated
extension of urban govemmeMal services, public facilities and utilities for new
development. Each jurisdiction shall identify intermediate grawth areas (six to ten year
increments) within its Urban Growth Area (UGA) or establish policies which direct growth
consistent with land use and capital facility plans.
Policy Topic 9- Fiscal Impacts
Policies
1. Each jurisdiction shall identify, within the capital facilities element of its comprehensive
plan, capital resources that will be available to accommodate the additional development
which is anticipated within Urban Growth Areas (UGAs).
4.2 Essentlal Public Faclltties
The City of Spokane Valley is required to plan for essential public facilities (EPFs) pursuant to
GMA. Spokane County adopted through the CWPPs 'Growth Management Essential Public
Facilities Technical Committee Report° in 1996, which set forth a model project review process for
the siting of EPFs. All jurisdictions within the County are required to provide a mechanism in the
Comprehensive Plan to utilize the model project review process either verbatim or as a model.
More recently, the Washington State Legislature passed two laws addressing siting of EPFs. In
June 2001 the state enacted ESSB 6151, and in March 2002 the state enacted ESSB 6594. These
laws require counties and cities fully planning under GMA to include a process in their
Comprehensive Plans to provide for the siting of Secure Community Transition Facilities (SCTFs).
A"secure community transition facility" (SCTF) is the statutory name for a less restrictive attemative
residerrtial facility program operated or contracted by the Departrnent of Social and Heatth Services.
As stated in RCW 71.09.020, "...a secure community transition tacility has supenrision and security,
and either provides or ensures the provision of sex offender treatment services." The program
offers 24hour intensive staffing and line-of-sight supervision by trained escorts when residents
leave the facility. A less restrictive aitemative (LRA) placement is defined in the state law es a living
arrangement that is less restrictive than total confinement.
In response to these new state laws, planning staff from all jurisdictions in Spokane County formed
a task force to cooperatively develop a regional siting process for all essential public facilities,
including SCTFs. The Essential Public Facilities Task Force, with assistance from the Washington
State Office of Community Development (OCD), the Department of Social and Health Services
(DSHS), and technical staff from the jurisdictions developed a regional siting process for essential
public facilities titled Spokane County Regional Siting Process for Essential Public Facilities. Table
4.2 below lists EPFs that ere either wholly or partically of located within the City.
The regional process provides for a review process with a location anafysis. Public involvement
takes place throughout the process with public comment periods as well as public hearings. The
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities ~
Page 6 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
review process requires the applicant for an EPF to assume responsibility for the bulk of the
analysis and processing of the proposal. The analysis includes two parts. First, an analysis of
functional criteria of all patential sites is conducted to select the highest-ranking ten (10) semi-
finalist sites. Second, these ten semi-finalist sites are analyzed using more qualitative criteria and
resutting in selection of at least three (3) preferred sites. Both analyses include public comment
periods.
Ne)d, the Board of County Commissioners (BoCC) conducts a public hearing on the Preferred Site
List to allow for further public comment, identify strategies to address any issues associated with
particular sites, and rank the finalist sites. The BoCC ranking is advisory to but not binding on the
applicant. Last, the applicant, after selecting a specific site, will worlc directly with e local jurisdiction
and its regulatory requirements to permit construction and operation of the EPF.
The regional sfting process is based on a coordinated inter jurisdictional approach, which in
combination with consistent development regulations among the jurisdictions will implement the
requirement of equitable distribution of EPF of a stetewide or regionaVcountywide nature.
TabN 4.2 Irtventory o1 Essenthl Publlc Factllties
Stgniflcance Category Name Addrsss
StateaAde Regional Trartsportatfon Facilities Interatate 90 N/A
Statewide Regional Trarisportation Fadtitlr.a Centemla! Trall WA
Regional Regional Transpatation Fadlities Pence-Cole Valley Paric 8 Rlde 414 S. Unlveralry Rd
and TransfVTrenafer Centet
Regional Reglonal Transportatlon FadlfUes Pines Road/l 90 Park 8 Wde E. MoMgomery, Plnes Rd
8180
Regional Reglonal Transportation FaallUes STA Mafntenance - Bowdish 123 S. Bowdlsh
(Fleck Service Center)
Regional ' Regional Transportation Fac111Ues SR-27 (Plnes Road) rUA
~ -
~ Regional Transportation Fedlities SR-290 (freM Avenue) WA
Regional -
Regional i Solid Waste, Waatewater 8 Water Fedlitles i Valley Recyding-Tranafer 3841 N. SuUhren Rd
Regional Sodal SeMoe Fadlitlea Valley Hospital 8 Med(cal 12606 E. Mlaslon Ave
Certter
Regional Sodal Service Fadppes American Behe~ral Heefth 1~ 15 E. Misston Ave
~
4.3 Goals and Policles
The following goals and policies are consistent with the goals end policies of the GMA and the
Countywide Planning Policies. The City of Spokane Valley will implement the goals and policies for
services provided by the City. Special purpose districts, such as water, school, and fire, are :
encouraged to implement the goals and policies that ere under their control. Spokane Valley
intends to coordinate with special purpose districts when they adopt end amend their own system
plans and cap'ttal improvement programs.
General
Goal CFG-1 Provlde facllitles and aervices that the Cfty can most effectlvety
deliver, and contract or franchlse for those facilities and services
that the City determines can best be provlded by a special district,
other jurisdictlon, or the private sector.
Policies
CFP-1.1 Review plans of service providers within Spokane Valley to determine
consistency with the SVCP.
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facifities
Page 7 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
CFP-1.2 The City should seek a balance between the quality and cost of providing public
facilities and services.
CFP-1.3 Optimize the use of existing public facilities and promote orderiy compact urban
growth.
CFP-1.4 Coordinate the construction of public infrastructure with private development to
minimize costs whenever practicable and feasible.
Capital Facflltles Plannfng and Level of Service
Goal CFG-2 Adopt and implement a Capftal Facllities Plan to ensure public
facitities and aervices meet Leve1 of Service Standards.
Policies
CFP-2.1 Facilities and services shall meet the following minimum Level of Service
standards:
Table 4.3 Spokane Valley Lsvel oi Servlce Standards
Faciltty or Servlce ~ Level of Service Standard
Domestlc Water Meet the minimum Regional LOS'
Sewer Public sewer required iar new development
LOS D for Slgrtaflzed Intersections
Transportatlon LOS E tor Un-signalized Intersectlons
I Stormwater Meet the minimum Reglonal LOS•
Law Entorc;ement No miNrtwm LOS edopted
I Parks 1.92 acres per 1000 reslderrts
Llbrarles Ubrary Distrld to set LOS
Solid Waste Meet the minlmum Regfonal LOS'
Street Cleaning Mest the minimum Regional LOS'
Public Translt Meet the minimum Regtonal LOS'
Fre end EMS Meet the minimum Regional LOS' ~
Publlc Schools School Districts to set LOS
See Page 4 tor Reglonsl LOS stsndards .
CFP-2.2 Update the City's Capital Facilities Plan annually to ensure that services and
facilities are provided efficiently and effectively and to help establish budget
priorities.
CFP-2.3 Planned expenditures for capital improvements shall not exceed estimated I
revenues.
CFP-2.4 If adopted level of service standards cannot be maintained, the City shall
increase funding, reduce level of service standanis or reassess the Land Use
Element.
I
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
i
Page 8 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Public Safety - Fire and Police
C3oal CFG-3 Provide police protection efficiently and cost effectively to Spokane
Valley residents. Cooniinate with fire districts to ensure adequate
flre protection and emergency services for Spokane Valley citizens.
Policies
CFP-3.1 Encourage inter jurisdictional cooperation among law enforcement agencies and
fire districts to further develop, where practical, shared service and facility use.
CFP-3.2 Develop e comprehensive emergency management plan that meets the needs of
the City end coordinates with regional emergency planning efforts.
CFP-3.3 Require adequate emergency vehicle road access and water supply/pressure for
new development within the City.
CFP-3.4 Encourage property owners to create a defensible space between structures and
adjacent fuels and require that fire rated roofing materials are used on buildings
in forested areas.
Water and Sewer
Goal CFG-d Plans for water and sewer service should be conslstent with the
SVCP.
Policies
CFP4.1 Review water and sewer plans to detennine consistency with anticipated
population growth, future land uses, comprehensive plan land use policies and
development regulations.
CFP-4.2 Coordinate sewer planning with appropriate jurisdictions for consistency with the
SVCP.
CFP-4.3 Support continued planning for domestic water needs in partnership with water
purveyors, the Joint Aquifer Board, Washington State Department of Heatth and
the Washington State Department of Ecology.
CFP-4.4 Encourage public and private efforts to conserve water.
CFP-4.5 Dlscourage new, private domestic wells within the Spokane Valley City limits.
CFP-4.6 New development must connect to public sewer end water.
Solfd Waste
Goal CFG-6 Promote the reduction, re-use and recycling of solid waste.
Policies
CFP-5.1 Establish a City Hall recycling program to present a positive example of civic and
environmental responsibility.
CFP-5.2 Participate in updates to the Spokane County Cornprehensive Solid Waste
Management plan and support its implementation.
Stomnwater
Goal CFG-6 Ensure the provlsion of stormwater facllitles and related
management programs that protect aurface and groundwater
quality, prevent chronlc flooding from stormwater, maintain natural
stream hydrology and protect aquatlc resources.
( Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 9 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Policies
CFP-6.1 Require stormwater management systems for new development.
CFP-6.2 Create and implement a stormwater management plan to reduce impacts from
urban runoff.
CFP-6.3 Best management practices should be utilized to treat stormwater runoff prior to
absorption of runoff into the ground.
CFP-6.4 New development should include the multiple uses of facilities, such es the
irttegration of stormwater facilities with recreation and/or open space areas, when
possible.
CFP-6.5 Encourage the use of altematives to impenrious surfaces.
Llbrary Service
Goal CFG-7 Promote efficient and cost effective Ilbrary service to Spokane
Valley resldents.
Policies
CFP-7.1 Encourage continued ftee, reciprocal library services among all libraries within
the Spokane region.
CFP-7.2 Land use regulations should allow siting of library facilities in locations
convenient to residential areas.
CFP-7.3 Work collaboratively with the Spokane County Library District to develop long-
range library plans consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Schools
Goal CFG-8 School sltes and facilities should meet the education needs of
Spokane Valley citizens.
Policies
CFP-8.1 Develop land use designations that allow new schools where they will best serve
the community.
CFP-8.2 Consider the adequacy of school facilities when reviewing new residential
development.
CFP-8.3 Assist school districts in their planning processes.
Concurrency
Goal CFG-9 New development shall be served wfth adequate facllities and
services at the time of development, or within the tlme frame
consistent with state law.
Palicies
CFP-9.1 Implement e concurrency management system for transportetion, water and
sewer facilities.
Financing Growth
Goal CFG-10 Consfder a variety of revenue sources and funding mechanisms
Including, but not limited to, Impact fees.
Policies
CFP-10.1 Identify and pursue sources of revenue for financing public facilities.
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2000 Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 10 of 58
.
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Esaential Public Facilftjes
Goal CFG-11 Coliaborate with ail Spokane County jurisdictions in determining the
best locatfons for public and private essential public facilitfea.
Policles
CFP-11.1 Follow the process for siting esseritial public facilfties as set forth in the Spokane
Courity Regional Siting Process for Essential Public Facilities.
Potential Annexatian Areas
Goal CFG-12 Provlde capital facilities to serve and direct future arowth within the
City of Spokane Valley Poterrtial Annexation Areas
Policies
CFP-12.1 Plan and coordinate the location of Qublic facilfties and utilities in the potential
annexation areas
CFP-12.2 Considerin . in advance, proDertv acquisition opportunities for future facilfties
includina but not limited t4 aarks, police facilities, stormwater facilities,
greenbelts, ooen space, and street connections
CFP-12.3 Coordina e with adiacent iurisdictions in develo in capital improvement
proarams and studies addressina multi-iurisdictional issues
4.4 Caaltal Facilities Plan
4.4.1 Introduction
The Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) provides an analysis of the facilfties and services required to
support the future land use and growth projected in the Comprehensive Plan. The CFP includes a
six year capital projects and a financing plan for facilfties provided by the City. The finance plan
identifies specific revenue sources that the City reasonably anticipates will be available in the year
the project is scheduled to be constructed. The CFP includes Level of Service (LOS) standards for
each public facility or service and requires that new development be served by adequate facilities.
The purpose of the CFP is to use sound fiscal policies to provide adequate public facilfties
consistent with the land use element and concurrent with, or prior to, the impacts of development.
4.4.2 Growth Assumptlon
On November 30, 2004, the Spokane County Board of Commissioners approved Spokane Valley's
requested population allocation of 20,666 people. The al{ocation is the amount of people the City
can accommodate within its current boundary. Spokane Valley considers this en 'interim`
allocation until wastewater treatment capacity issues are resolved. Because Spokane Valley did
not request an ellocation outside of its City limits, facilfties required to serve Urban Growth Areas
adjacent to the City are not analyzed in this plan. These areas ere under the jurisdiction of
Spokane County; therefore, cepitat facilfties planning ectivities within UGAs will continue to be the
County's responsibility.
The following population data is used for capital facilfties planning purposes:
Table 4.4 Population ProJection
Year 20042008 2012 2026 .
PopulaUon E6,=88,920 92,243 105,678
4.4.3 Level of Service
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 11 of 58
,
Ciry of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Cities are often defined by the quality of facilities and services that are provided to its residents.
Good road, sewer and water infrastructure are typical criteria used by businesses considering
relocation. Park and recreation facilities are increasingty used to judge the quality of a City.
Businesses want to locate where they can attract the best employees, and qual'rty of life issues are
often the deciding factor for a person to move to a new area.
Level of service standards are quantifiable measures, such as acres of parlcs per 1000 people, or
the amount of time it takes to travel a road segment during peak moming and aftemoon "rush
hours,' the higher the level of service the higher the cost. This element establishes levels of
service which will be used to evaluate the adequacy and future cost of urban facilities and senrices.
4.4.4 Concurrency
The Growth Management Act introduces the concept of concurrency, which requires new
development to be served with adequate urban services at the time of development, or within a
specified time thereafter. The GMA allows six years for necessary transportation improvements to
be constructed as long as a financial commitment is made at the time of development. The GMA
strongly encourages concurrency for water and sewer, and it is good public policy to require the
same.
4.4.6 Flnancing Facllities and Services
The City is limited in its ability to finance all desired capital facility projects. Options must be
available for addressing funding shortfalls or decisions must be made to lower levels of service for
public facilities. In deciding how ta address a particular shortfall, the City will need to balance
current needs versus future growth requirements; existing deficiencies versus future expansions.
Capital facilities plans must be balanced. When funding shortfalls occur, the following options
should be considered:
a. Increase revenues,
b. decrease level of service standards,
c. decrease the cost of the senrice or facility,
d. decrease the demand for the senrice or facility,
e. or some combination of the above.
The following table presents possible financial resources available to the City for capital projects.
Table 4.6 Funding Resources
Funding Category I Funding Source
General Fund (Salea Tax, tees, property tax, utllity tax, etc.)
Current Revenues Real Eataie Exdse Tex (REET)
Impad Fees
Non-voted Generat Obligatlon
Voted General Obligetion
Bonds
Revenue (payable from e partlcular utility or enterprise)
Local Improvement DisVict (asaessment Bonds)
Surface Transportatlon Program
Bridge Replacement Funda
Federal Grants Congestlon Mftigatlon and Alr Quality Improvemant Program (CMAO)
Land and Water Conaervation Fund
Community Development Blodc Grants
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 12 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Tabte 4.6 Funding Resources
Funding Category ~ Funding Source
AquaGc Lands Erhancement Account (ALEA)
TranaportaUon Improvement Account
Centennlal Clean Water Fund
Pubtk VIlorks Trust Funds i
State GrantslLoana Intem9ency for Cammittee for Outdoor Recxeatlon (lAC)
Artertal Street Fund (Motor Fual Tax)
Urban Arterial Trust Axotmt (UATA)
Aquatlc l.ands Enhanoement Acxourit
Hazardoua Brfdge Replacement
Developer Contributlons
Other Donatlarts
Local lmprovement Districta
4.4.6 Impact Fees
New growth creates a demand for new and expanded public facilities and services. The GMA
authorizes local govemments to impose and collec# impact fees to partially fund public facilities to
accommodate new growth. Impact iees can be used to pay for new or expanded facilities and
cannoi be collected to address existing inftastructure deficiencies. The GMA ailvws impact tees to
be assessed on the foliowing:
• Public Streets and Roads • Public Parks
• Schools • Open Space
• Fire Protection Facilities • Recreation Facilities
The City has not enacted impact fees as a funding mechanism for capital facilities, but may study
the issue as directed by future City policy.
4.4.7 CommunFty Facilkles
This section of the CFP includes civic buildings such as govemment offices, community centers,
and entertainment facilities. As a new City, Spokane Valley does not have a significant inventory of
community facilities.
Inventory of Existing Facllities
Spokane Valley completed construction of CenterPtace at Mirabeau Point Park, in the summer,
2005. The facility hauses the Spokane Valley Senior Center, conference facilities, classrooms and
a"great room" for events. CenterPlace has a dining capacity of 400 and includes a full commercia(
kitchen.
Spokane Valley leases office and meeting space for employees and City Council in the Redwood
PIaZa office building, located at 11707 East Sprague Avenue. Spokane Valley also leases precinct
and court space at the Valley Precinct Building located 12710 East Sprague.
Level of Servlce
Spokane Valiey does not propose to adopt a levei of service standard for community facilities.
Forecasi of Future Needs
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 13 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
The need for new community facilities is difficult to quantify and depends on the future structure of
City govemment. If Spokane Valley continues to contract for services such as police, parks and
road maintenance, the need to acquire and maintain facilities will be minimal. However, ff Spokane
Valley begins providing these services, there will be a corresponding need for administrative office
space and other facilities. For exemple, if Spokane Valley assumes responsibility for parlcs
maintenance, a new maintenance facility would have to be constructed to house equipment and
employees.
At some future point, Spokane Valley will likely purchase an existing building or construct a new
building to house City Hall. This decision must be made with thought and vision. In the right
location, City Hall will be the center for civic affairs and community events and will influence
economic development and the creation of a City Center. The location should be centralized and
accessible to all citizens.
Nearly three-quarters of the Citizen Survey respondents support using public money to help create
e City Center. Locating a civic building, such as City Hall, in the City Center would be a significant
catalyst to creating a distinct center and identity for Spokane Valley.
Locations and Capacides of Future Facllities
Spokane Valley currentty has no specific plans to construct new community facilities. The City
must decide the location of a permanent City Hall and/or other civic buildings. Future updates to
the Capital Facilities element will include information on locations and capacities for community
faalities.
Capltal Projects and Financing Plan
Spokane Valley enticipates either constructing a new City Hall building, or purchasing and
remodeling an existing building within the six year time frame of this CFP. The following table
shows that Spokane Valley will use epproximately $1,000,000 of Real Estate Excise Tax revenue
for Civic Buildings.
Table 4.6 Communtry Facllttlss Flnanclnp Plsn ~
ProJect 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 1 2014 Total
C#v(c Fadlities 563 550 750 ~ 1,300 3.163
I I I i
Total j 0 I 0 0 1 663 650 750 i 1,300 3,163
Revenue Source
Real Estate Excise Tax I i 250 250 400 ! 100 1,000
General Fund i I 313 300 350 I 1,200 2,163
,
Total ~ 0 ~ 0 0 683 ~ 650 750 I 1.300 ~ 3,163
4.4.8 Domestlc Water
The City of Spokane Valley does not own or operate a public water supply system. Rather, water is
provided to Spokane Valley residences and businesses by special purpose districts, associations,
and public and private corporations. Water service is coordinated by Spokane County through the
Coordinated Water System Plan (CWSP), which identifies service boundaries, establishes
minimum design standards and promotes the consolidation of regional water resource
management. The CWSP is updated es needed at the direction of the Board of County
Commissioners or the Washington State Department of Health (DOH).
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200D Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 14 of 58
C+ty of Spokane Valley Camprehensive P(an
The City of Spokane Valley is supportive of existing regional water supply planning, water use
efficiency programs and ptans, watershed planning, weilhead protection. plans, water quality plans,
and planning for reclamation and reuse. ,-r- ~T--
Water Systems
Water systems are categorized generalfy
by the number of connections served;
Group A systems provide service to 15 or
more connections while Group 8 systems
,.serve 2 to 14 connections. Spokane
Valley has 25 Group A systems and 13 ~ ,
Group B systems providing water senrice ~
within the City. A detalled inventory of
water systems is shown below in the j^
inventory section.
' ater System Plans
~e Washington State Department of Heafth recommends that all water purveyors prepare a water
stem plan to determine future needs for water facilities within their service areas. The plans must
clude an existing fecility inventory, project future needs for water supply, conservation strategies,
and Identify and provide for the protection of aquifers against contaminaies. Once a water system
plan is adopted, it must be updated every six years. The Department of Heafth is the approval
authority for water system plans. Water purveyors meeting the following criteria are required to
have water system plans approved by DOH.
1. Systems having 1000 or more cannections.
2. Systems required tv develop water system plans under the Pub(ic Water System
Caordination Act of 1977 (Chapter 70.116 RCVN).
1 Any system experiencing problems related to planning, operation and/or management as
determined by the Department of Heafih.
4. All new systems.
5. Any expanding system.
6. Any system proposing to use the document submittal exception process in WAC 246-290-
125 (documents such as project reports and constructions drawings).
In 2003, the Washington State Legislation passed what is commoniy referred to as the 'Municipal
Water Law' (MWL), emending sections of the State Board of Health Code (RCW 43.20); the laws
goveming Public Water Systems (RCW70.1 1 9A); and sections of the state's Water Code (RCW
90.03). The MWL requires that water system planning documents must be consistent wiih
Spokane Valley's Comprehensive Plan and development regulations. The Department of Heafth is
developing procedures that water systems must follow to ensure coordination with local jurisdictions
end consistency with growth planning.
Water Rights
Washington State water law requires a!I prospective water uses to obtain a water right permit from
the Department of Ecology (DOE) before constructing a well or withdrawing any groundwater from
a well. However, the law does allow a water right permit exemption, referred to as the domestic
exemption, which states that no water right permit is required for the withdrawal of up to 5,000
gallons of water per day from e well when the water is being used for the following:
1. Ljvestock watering.
2. Single or group domestic water suppfy.
3. Industrial purposes.
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200.9 Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 15 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
4. Irrigation of no more than one hatf acre of lawn or noncommercial garden (RCW
90.44.050).
For many years, Ecology issued water right certificates to water suppliers based on projected future
use, rather than actual "beneficial use." The unused portions of those certificates or rights are
knawn as "inchoate" rights, which could potentially be taken away by Ecology if not put to beneficial
use.
This situation was troubling to municipal water suppliers. Public water systems need a level of
certainty to obtain financing for capital facilities as well as to issue letters of water aveilability to
development interests. The 'Municipal Water Law: of 2003° clarified that cities are enthled to
inchoate (unused) water for the purpose of serving expanding areas. This ensures that
municipalities have sufficient water for anticipated growth based on the communities'
comprehensive plans and water end supply plans.
Watershed Planning
In 1998, Washington State passed the Watershed Management Act to develop a'thorough and
cooperative method of determining what the current water resource situation is in each Water
Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) of the state and to provide local citizens with the maximum
possible input conceming their goals and objectives for water resource management end
developmenY (RCW 90.82.005). In late 1998, a Planning Unit was formed for WRIAs 55 and 57, or
the Middle Spokane-Little Spokane River watersheds, with Spokane County designated as the lead
agency.
The Watershed Management Act requires the Planning Unit to address water quantity issues and
allows water quality, habitat and in-stream flows to be considered in the process. The watershed
planning effort is expected to produce information on how water is used in the Water Resource
Inventory Areas and recommendations for how it should be used in the future.
The Planning Unit may also formulate a recommendation for in-stream flaws for the Spokane and
Little Spokane Rivers. The Department of Ecology may establish minimum water flows or levels for
streams, lakes or other public waters for the purpose of protecting fish, game, birds or other wildlife
resources, or recreational or aesthetic values of said public waters whenever it eppears to be in the
public interest to do so.
The data, information end recommendations generated by the Planning Unit may be used by the
Department of Ecology to assess the ability to issue new water rights for the Spokane Valley-
Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer. The WRIA 55 and 57 planning process will provide a basis for better
understanding of potential water resource limits and will be incorporated into future updates to this
capital facilities plan.
Inventory of Water Systems
Most of the water used by Spokane Valley residents and businesses is provided by water and
irrigation districts and small water systems, listed in Tables 4.7 and 4.8 and shown on the Water
Districts and Wellheads map, located at the end of this chapter. The City of Spokane provides
water to the westem portions of Spokane Valley, totaling approximately 620 connections. Group
A water systems are those which have 15 or more service connections or regularly serve 25 or
more people 60 or more days per year. Group B water systems serve two to 14 connections and
are not subject to the federal Safe Drinking Water Act. Instead, they must meet stete and local
requirements forwater quality and operations.
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 16 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Pian
Table 4.7 Spokane Valley Watef Purveyors - C3roup A Systoms
Current Residentlal Current Non Restdentlal Storage
Group A Systems Cannecdons Connections ~~city
(gallar►s)
Beycw On 6arker 0 4 0
guqW Rpyel 4 1 50
camr,ope irrigauon oiWa 7 ass o 0
"centrai Pre Miz • Sunivan Rd 4 4 1 o
city or spokane• 59700• o Noc reporced~
Corisol{deted IMg Dist 19 System 1 3083 51 2,750,000
Conaotidated IRig Dist 19 System 2 3663 141 ' 2,200,000
Essi Spokane V1later Dist 1 1158 94 1,027,000
Hutchtnaon Irrlgatiort Distfl8 790 ~ 0 1,200,000 -
Honeyweil Ele&onic Mfg LLC 0 1 0
Irv1n Water Diatrid #8 757 0 1,900,000
Kalser Altxn • Trentwood Wbtks 0 2 21,200
Model Irtigeftn Dist #18 2116 ' 4 550,000
Modem Electrlc Watar Co 4302 0 1,500,000
Orchard Avenue Irrigation Dist 6 I 1188 0 0
PMecxoR Mobile Home Parlc 143 0 400
Puerte Valter4a 0 1 0
Spnfire Pub And Eatery 0 2 87
Spokane Business 8 Industrial Parlc 0 237 478,000
Spokane Co - Mirabeau Park ~ 0 2 2b0
Spokane Co Water Dist #3 9788 ~ 428 6,880,000
Ttentwood IRigetion Districl 3 1470 0 1,120,000
Vera Water 8 Power - 6662u p 8,650,000-Waodlend Perk TraUer CouK 30 0 0
• Apprmckmately 820 connectlons within Clty d Spokane Valley ~
Souroe: 1Naafihption State Departrnent d Hwlth
- -
Tsbte 4.8 Oruup B 8ystems
Qroup 8 Syatem Connectlons
Hoilday Trailer Court 12
Jenun b Janzen 1
Lavemier Const.lNeter S~IStem 1
Mercer T6ddng Co Inc 1
Middco Tool 8 Equipment I '
Systems Transport Inc 1
Td Water System 8
Tds 2
- - - - -
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 17 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
~
Unlon Padflc Railroad - Trentwood 1 ~
Westca S Apparel Service 3
Westem Strudurea Inc ~ 2
VNSDT-Fines Road Malntenence 1
Source: Washington 8tate Departrnent ot Health
Level of Service
The Countywide Planning Policies were amended in 2004 to defer level of service standards for
water supply and fire flow to the requirements of the Department of Health and local fire codes
respectively.
Forecast of Future Needs
Spokane Valley adopts by reference water system plans for all water purveyors providing service
within the City of Spokane Valley.
Locations and Capacities of Future Facllfties
Spokane Valley adopts by reference water system plans for all water purveyors providing service
within the City of Spokane Valley.
Capital Projects and Financing Plan
Spokane Valley adopts by reference capital project and financing plans for all water purveyors
providing service within the City of Spokane Valley.
Fire Protection and Emergency Medical Service
Fire protection and emergency medical services ~
(EMS) ere provided by Spokane Valley Fire
Department (District No. 1) and Spokane County
Fire District No. 8. Spokane Valley Ffre serves over
90% of the Valley, while District 6 serves a few ,
small areas in the southem part of the City (see Fire
• _
Districts Map at the end of this chapter). Both
~ -
districts serve the City with a full range of fire
suppression and EMS services. Spokane Valley
voters chose to annex to Spokane Valley Fire and
District No. 8 In September, 2004. - Insurance Rating
City fire departments end fire protection districts are essigned a numerical fire protection rating by
the Washington Surveying and Ratings Bureau. Insurance companies fund the Bureau to perform
on-site inspections of fire districts to detennine the rating. The 8ureau analyzes five main areas:
average response time, water supply, communication network, schedule of fire inspections and fire
station evaluations (which focus on age of vehicles), personnel training and staffing of facilities.
Insurance companies use the fire protection rating to help determine insurance rates on all fire
insurance policies. The rating is on a scale of one to ten, with one representing the best score.
Quality of fire service can have a significant impact on fire insurance rates, particularly for
commercial businesses. As of April, 2006, Spokane Valley Fire Department has a Fire Insurance
Rating of four and District No. 8 has a Rating of five, both indicating good fire protection.
Inventory of Existtng Facllities and Apparatus
The Fire Districts Map shows the location of fire stations and service area boundaries for Spokane
Valley Fire, District No. 8 and surrounding fire protection districts. All flre agencies have mutual aid
agreements to assist each other in major emergencies.
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 18 of 58
.
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Spokane Valley Fire 2006 apparatus inventory includes nine Class A engines, two Class A
pumperiladders, two medic vehicies, three brush trucks and other miscellaneous vehicles for staff,
training, rescue, maintenance, prevention and command. Spokane Velley Fire has ten stations,
including eight within the City of Spokane Valley. Locations of the stations are as follows:
Table 4.9 Spokane Valley Flre
Dlstrlct Stadon Locatlons
~
Statlon 1• 10319 East Sprague
StaUon 2' 8007 East Trcnt
' Statlon 3 2218 NathHarvard ~
Station 4 22406 East Wellesley
Stati~on 6' 15610 East Mariet!a
Statlon 6' 6306 East Sprague ~
~ Ststlon 7' 1121 South Evergreen T
Stadon 8' Ndth 2110 Wflbur ~
Station 9 East 1151416''
Statian 10" East 17217 Spr~~guP
• Inslde Spokane Valley Clty Umtta ;
" Medic-only statien
Fire District No. 8 has one fire station inside the City limits, station 84 in the Ponderosu
neighborhood, located at 4410 South Bates. The District has two stations located outside the Ciiy
limits providing additional coverage, No. 81 at 6117 South Palouse Highway and No. 85 at 3324
South Linke Road. Stations 81 and 84 each have two Class A engines and two wildland brush
engines. Station 85 has one Class A engine and one wildland brush enginE.
Level of Service
Spokane Valley Fire's Level of Service goals for response time are as follovrs~
• 5:00 minutes - 80% of the time for fire calls
• 5:00 minutes - 80% of the time for Basic Life Support (BLS)
• 8:00 minutes - 80% of the time for Advanced Life Support (ALS)
Basic Life Support refers to a level of training that does not involve any advanced medical
procedures or administration of drugs. BLS providers can provide basic tife saving and life
sustaining interventions while transporting a patient to a hospital. This is the foundation on which
all medical care is built. Good basic life support is key to survival of critically sick and injured
patients.
Advanced Ltfe Support refers to e certain leve{ of care that may be provided to a patient by rescue
squad members, if necessary. Members trained in Advanced Life Support techniques sre often
referred to as ALS providers. Among other procedures, ALS providers are able to administer certain
life-saving medications, perform edvanced monitoring of heart rhythms, and are trained to perform
advanced procedures to open and manage e patient's airway.
Average response times for fire calls the past 4 years are as follows:
• 2003 - 5 minutes 22 seconds
• 2002 - 5 minutes 27 seconds
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200,9~ Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 19 of 58
mmm-q
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
• 2001 - 5 minutes 28 seconds
• 2000 - 5 minutes 35 seconds
The District's historic response time data does not distinguish between types of calls. Future data
collection will divide calls between fire, ALS and BLS.
Spokane Valley Fire has responded to an average 7,746 calls per year from 2000 to 2003. The
following table shows the number of calls per year.
Table 4.10 Distdct 1 Fire Resporeses
i
Year 2000 2001 2002 2003
Responses 7594 7406 7821 8165
The Countywide Planning Policies for Spokane County establishes minimum levels of service for
fire and emergency medical services as follows:
Urban areas are required to be serviced by a Fire Distdct with et least a Class Six Insurance rating.
• Urban areas must be within five road miles of an operating fire station that provides service
with a"Class A" pumper, unless structures are equipped with fire sprinklers.
• Urban areas shall be served by a state certified basic life support (BLS) agency within five
miles and an operating advanced life support unit within six miles or ten minutes response
time.
Both Fire District 1 and 8 meet the minimum countywide level of service standards.
Forecast of Future Needs
Spokane Valley Fire has identified two areas within the City of Spokane Valley that need
improvement in response times and is planning to construct new stations to provide improved
service levels. The most urgent need is to provide better coverage to the south valley, and the
District is planning to move Station No. 9 to the vicinity of 32"d Ave. and Pines Rd.
The northeast area of the City is underdeveloped at present but as the City grows over the next ten
to fifteen years, the Distdct recognizes that a new station will need to be constructed to provide an
adequate level of service. The station will be constructed in the vicinity of Barker and Euclid.
Locatlons and Capacities of Future Facllitles
Station No. 9 will be moved from its current location at 11514 East 16"' to the vicinity of 32n° and
Pines. The station will include two bays and dorms for eight personnel. The District plans to
reconstruct Station No. 10 into a three bay facility with dorms for ten personnel. Station No. 11 will
be located in the vicinity of Barker and Euclid and will also be two bays with danns for eight
personnel. Construction for Station 11 is tentatively planned for 2014 or 2015.
Capital ProJects and Financing Plan I
Spokane Valley Fire Department is a junior taxing authority that supplements its regular taxes with
special levies. As the restrictions on the taxes generated from the regular tax go down, special
levies are proposed to maintain needed funding. Special levies must be approved by Fire Distdct
voters. The Department does not use its bonding capacity to fund capital projects. The
Department's philosophy is to reserve funds generated through its regular revenues for future
capital needs. The following table represents the Valley Fire planned capital expenditures.
~
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 20 of 58
City of Spokene Valley Comprehensiv+e Plan
Table 4.11 3pokane Vslley Flre 6-year Capitsl ProJects artd Financing Pian
Projsct 2006 2007 2008 2008 2010 2011 2012 Total
Fire S'tation No. 9
$1,000 $1,800
(new oonatrudion)
Flre Statlon No. 10
51,800 $1,800
(reconstrucdon)
Total $1.000 $1,800 $2,800
Note: Reserve funds trom regular diaMd taxes wpl fund cepital improvemeMa.
(Arrrounts aro dmes $1.000)
I
4.4.9 Library Service
Library services are provided by the Spokane County Library District. The District has e long
history of excellent service and upan incorporation, the City of Spokane Valley executed a one-year
contract with the District for continued service. After the initial year, Spokane Valley and the Library
District agreed to a five year contract for library senrices beginning in 2005. Eighty-seven percent
of voters approved annewng back into the District in a May 2005 special election, with the
annexation effective January 1, 2006.
Faclllty Planning
After incorporation, the Library District end the City of Spokane Valfey collaborated on developing a I
new capital facilities plan for the District. In March 2004, the capital facilities planning process
began and a signficaM amount of information was gathered, including:
• Comparisons with library facilitles in other similar sized Washington cities
• Spokane Valley demographics
• Public library facility standards
• An analysis of current Spokane Valley erea libraries
• Pros and cons of various facility aftematives and
• Community research
Public ParticlpaUon
The Library District and the City of Spokane Valley conducted a random sample survey of Spokane
Valley residents in March and April of 2004. The survey ga#hered information on local library use,
satisfaction with library services and preferences regarding future library services.
The District elso conducted a community open house in May 2004, attended by 75 people, 75% of
which were City residents. Information was obtained on satisfaction with facilities and service,
facility improvement options, preferred library locations if e new main library were to replace the
current Valley Library, constructing either one or two new branches, end willingness to pay for new
libraries.
Research Concluslons
Anatysis of information gathered leads to the conclusion that additional library space is needed to
serve Spokane Valley residents. It is also determined that expanding the current Valley Library isn't
a viable aftemative. The community input showed a very high level (98%) of overell satisfaction
with library services and a high level of satisfaction with current facilities. The public ldentified two
areas needing improvement - materials availability, which requires a larger library, and public
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capitel Facilibes I
Page 21 of 58
I
Ciry of Spokane Valiey Comprehensive Plan
access computer availability. Only a modest interest in funding new facilities was expressed,
demonstrating a strong need for community education about future library facilities needs.
Communfty Survey
Spokane Valley's Community Preference Survey
included a question to gauge Spokane Valley
citizen's satisfaction with current Library services.
. "
The majority of survey respondents viewed library
services in a positive light, with 83% of
respondents reporting that library services were
good, very good or excellent. :
Inventory of Existing Facllfties
Spokane Valley has one library located inside its
boundary, the District's Valley Branch, located at 12004 East Main. This resource library is the
District's largest facility, measuring 22,100 square feet, including administrative space. The District
has two other libraries within the greater Valley area located at 4322 North Argonne and 22324
East Wellesley in Otis Orchards.
As of May 2004, 35,544 Spakane Valley residents were Library District cardholders. Valley Library
was the primary branch of registration, with Argonne ~ VALLEY
second end Otis Orchards third. Spokane County ~
Library District has a reciprocal library carci agreement ~
with the City of Spokane with over 1,500 Spokane ~~«dr►ayAr
-I 7d Valley residents owning a Spokane public library card. ~~iVor ~lan ~
! wA
Level ot Servlce
The Spokane County Library District has not ~
~ p E tft Av
established a level of service.
Forecast of Future Needs
The District uses a target Spokane Valley population of 105,000 for its future projections, which is
consistent with the City of Spokane Valley's population allocation for growth within the existing City
limits. The District recognizes that a new library needs to be built inside Spokane Valley to provide
adequate librery seniices. Future facilities will be divided befinreen a main branch and a future
neighbofiood branch.
Locations and Capacitles ot Future Facllitles
The main branch should measure ebout 49,000 square feet to adequately senre a population of
84,000 people. The main branch should be located on an arterial street within about one-half mile
of the Sprague corridor between Dartmouth end Sullivan Roads. A neighborhood branch of
approximately 15,000 square feet serving a population of 20,000 would ideally be located within two
to three miles of the main branch.
Capital Projects and Financing Plan
The future main branch is estimated to cost $11.4 million in 2004 dollars; the neighborhood branch
would cost about $3.6 million. Voter-approved general obligation bonds are the normal financing
method for library projects of this size.
The District proposes the following capital improvement schedule:
1 to 6 years
• Determine preferred locations for new libraries.
• Develop funding plan.
• Purchase lend for libraries.
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 22 of 58
City of Spokane Valiey Comprehensive Plan
6 to 10 years
• Secure funding and purchase site(s) if not already done.
• Construct new main branch.
• Sell existing Valley branch.
10 to 20 years
• Secure funding end construct neighborhood branch.
Tabie 4.12 Spokane County Libnry Dlstrlct slx ysar Capttel ProJects and Financing Plan
Project 2008 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Tatal
New Spokane Valley $100 $150 $1,700 $8,300 $8,750 0 0 $19,000
Library I i I
,
Total $100 $150 $1,700 $8.300 ~ $8,750 0 Q $19,000
Revenue 8ourcea .
GO Bonds $100 ' $150 $1,700 $8,500 $8,760 0 0 ~ 19000
~ .
Totel $1100 $160 ~ $1,700 i8,500 I $8,760 i 0 0 ~ 18000
Note: The meJority of General Fund expenaaa Incxxred tn 2006 and 2007 are refmbursable from voter-approved bond funds.
The Library District will continue to work with the City of Spokane Vailey to further develop plans to
construct new libreries. As plans are updated and refined, this Capital Facilities Plan will be
amended to incorporate future changes.
Operatlonal Casts
The Library District assumes that with efficient building design and continuing staff productivity
improvements, a larger Valley Library and an eventual new branch can be operated at normal
District funding levels of 50 cents per $1,000 of assessed valuation.
4.4.10 Parks and Recreation
Spokane Valley has a wide range of - s - ~
recreational opportunities available to resjdertts
and visitors. City parks, school play fields, golf ~~v~ ''i~;~'~►~
courses, trails, County parks and conservations areas are all within close vicinity to Spokane : , J~ V '
Valley residents.
The City provides a system of local parks that is
managed by the Spokane Valley Parks and
Recreation Department. The Parks Department -
is in the process of developing a new Parks, - - Recreation, and Open Spaces Master Plan.
When finished, this plan wi11 offer a detailed I
picture of the park, recreation and open space
system, including changes and improvements
that will be made in the future. This section of the Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) provides summaries of the parks inventory, level of
service (LOS), future parlc needs, proposed projects, and a financing plan for the next six years.
Park Types
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 23 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Parks are classified by their size, senrice area and function. Spokane Valley uses the nationally
recognized Pa►it, Recreation, Open Space and Greenwey Guidelines, to establish standard for
parks planning. Major classif~cations include mini-park, neighborhood, school-park, community,
large urban, various trail designations and special use facilities. The Parks Element, Chapter 9,
provides a thorough description of park types used for planning purposes.
Inventory of Existing Facilities
The Parks Map, found at the end of this Chapter, shows the location of all parks within Spokane
Valley. Table 4.13 provides an inventory of park and recreation facilities owned by Spokane Valley.
These parks are used to calculate Spokane Valley's level of senrice for parks. The Parks Master
Plan provides the most detailed inventory of parks, including equipment, structures and other
miscellaneous park facilities.
Table 4.13 Spokane Valley Park Facllltles
Spokane Valley Parks Acroage Status
~
Nelghborhood Parks
i .
Balfour Park 2•86 Developed
BroHms Park 8.03 - - Deveioped
CasUe Park 2.71 Mtnimally Developed
Edgediff Park 4.74 Developed
Terraoe Vfew Park 9.24 Developed
Subtotal I 27.68
I Comrnuntty Parks
Valley Mlasfon Park 21.91 Developed
Subtotal 21.91
I Large Urban Parka
Mirabeau Pofnt Park 41•91 Developed
Subtotal 41.91 ' I
I
Speclal Use Areas
Park Roed Pool - 2.00 Developed '
Sullivan Park 16.07 Developed
I VaUey Senlor Center --2.09 Developed
CenterPlece 13.60 Developed
Subtotal i 53.78
Undeveloped Park Land
Myrtie PoiM Park 31.07 Undeveloped
Valley Miasion Park (South) 7.22 Undeveloped
Subtotal 38.29 '
i
Total Park Acres 163.46 '
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 24 of 58
,
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Level of Service
The Countywide Planning Policies for Spokane County requires all jurisdictions to adopt a level of
service (LOS) standard for parks. Spokane ~
Valley has the flexibility and freedom to adopt e~~ i
LOS standard for parks that reflects the `expressed need and desire of our community.
,
The National Recreation and Parks Association
suggest that cities adopt LOS standards for '
different park types, such as mini (pocket), neighborhood, community and major parlcs. ~
Spokane Va11ey does not have a well-developed
-
park system and will use total City-owned park
acres for its LOS measurement.
SPokane Va11eY cuRentlY owns 163 acres of
developed and undeveloped park land. Using the
opulation of 85,010 people, the current I W~j
2006 p -
,
parks LOS is 1.92 acres of City park land for every 1000 residents. Spokane Valley edopts 1.92 acres/1000 people as its minimum LOS
standard for parks, as shown is Table
Teble 4.14 Spokane Valley Rarks Level oi Servlce 4.14.
Spokane Valley recognizes that
cfty-owned schools, churches, natural areas and
2008 PopulaUon park Acres Level of servtc,o commercial enterprises all provide
~ recreation opportunities for Spokane
Valley residents. These will all be
85,0~0 ~ ~s3 ~.92 aaes~tooo {eken into consideration when
Spokane Valley determines the best
location to purchase new park land.
Forecast of Future Needs
Spokane Valley has the capacity to accommadate 20,666 people over the next 20 years within the
cuRent City limits. In order to maintain the current LOS of 1.92 acres/1000 people, Spokane Valley
would have to add about 40 ecres of park land over the next 20 years, with 12 acres in the first six
years, as shown in Table 4.15. The Parks Master Plan provides a more detailed analysis of park
and recreation needs by dividing the City into smaller service areas.
Table 4.16 Future Patk Demand
Year Populatlon Total Park Acres Acres Requlred at 1.92 ' Net Deticlency Acres
Available ecresh000
2006 85.010 163 ~ 163 - 0
2012 - 92,243 ~ 163 ~ 177 ' •14
2025 105,678 I 163 203 -40
•Assum•s ZO-year 8rowth o1 20,666 people
J
Locations and Capacides ot Future Facilitles
In order to maintain the adopted 1.92 acres/1000 level of service stendard, Spokane Valley must
add 12 acres of park land by the year 2011. In order to address this deficiency, Spokane Valley wilt
purchase 20 acres of park land within the six year time frame of this Capital Facilities Plan, resuiting
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 25 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
in surplus of eight acres as shown in Table 4.16. The Master Plan will be used to determine the
best locations for park land acquisitions.
Tabla 4.1 B Parks Capaclty Malyeis
Year Populatlon Totsl Park Acrss ! Acres Requlred at 1.92 Not Reserve Acrts
Avallable acresh 000
2006 85,010 163 163 0
2012 92,243 183' 177 6
'ZO acres of parlcland w(II be purchased wtthln flrst 6 years of plan
Capital ProJects and Financing Plan
The following table details Spokane Valley's six year Parks and Recreation capital improvement
financing plan. The table deteils projects that address level of service deficiencies (capacity
projects) and other capital improvements (non-capacity) projects.
Table 4.17 Parks Capital Facllltles Plan
Note: Amounta In;1,000
ProJect 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 i 2011 ~ 2012 Total
Park Lend Acquisitfon (ZO 1,000 $1,000
Acres Capadty)
Paric Improvements 300 950 500 500 580 100 200 $3,130
Slruimming Pool Upgrades 1,600 $1,600
Total 1.300 2,550 500 500 580 100 200 $5.730
Revenue Source ~ I
- - -----I--------I-----I------ - -
General Fund 1,300 300 $1,600
REET #1 450 400 400 400 100 200 $1,950
Granta 200 1 DO 100 180 $580
Spokane Counry 1,600 $1.600
Total 1,300 2,550 500 500 580 100 200 $5,730
4.4.11 Publlc Safety ,
The Spokane Valley Police Department is a contract law enforcement agency, partnering with the
Spokane County Sheriff's Department to provide a safe environment for the citizens, businesses,
end visitors of the City of Spokane Valley. This unique contracting relationship allows for the
sharing of many of our resources, allowing both agencies to operate at peak efficiency without
duplicating services.
Spokane Valley also contrects with Spokane County for judicial, jail and animal control services.
The total contract for public safety for 2006 totaled over $16 million, including approximately 100
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 26 of 58
,
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive P1an
commissioned police officers.
Spokane Valley supports community oriented policing and recognizes it as an important
complement to traditional law enforcement. In Spokane County, community policing is knawn as
S.C.O.P.E., or Sheriff Community Oriented Policing Effort. The community policing model balances
reactive responses to calls for service with proactive problem-solving centered on the causes of
crime end disorder. Community policing requires police and citizens to join together as partners in
the course of bath identifying and effectively addressing these issues. About 364 Spokane Valley
citizens are S.C.O.P.E volunteers.
Communfty Survey
The Community Preference Survey included questions to gauge the public's perception of police
services. Results show that 85% of Spokane Valley residents believe police services are good,
very good, or excellent, indicating a generally high level of confidence in the police force. Only 27°!0
of respondents expressed a willingness to pay additional taxes to have improved police services.
Inventory of Exlsting Facilities
The Spokane Valley Police Precinct is located at 12710 E. Sprague and houses patrol and
detective divisions, the traffic unit and sdministrative staff. The Precinct also includes a property
storage facility and a Spokane County District Court.
Spokane Vailey is served by five S.C.O.P.E. stations, shawn in the following table.
Table 4.18 Spokan! Valley 8.C.O.P.E stationa ~
Nelghborhood Locatlon Neighborhood LocaUon
West Valley 3102 North Argonne Trentwood 2400 N. Wilbur # 79
Urthrerslty 10621 East 15" Central Velley 115 N. Evergreen Rd.
Edgecliff 522 S. Thierman Rd. East 4903 N. Harvard #3
Level of Service
Public safety is a priority for the Crty of Spokane Valley. It is difficult to determine at this time, an
edequate and measurable level of police protection. Spokane Valley will monitor the performance
of the Spokane County SherifPs Department and will adjust the contract for services as necessary
to ensure an adequate level of police protection.
Forecast of Future Needs
Future needs for police protection will be determined as a part of the annual budget process.
Locations end Capacitles oi Future Faclllties
Spokane Valley is not planning to eonstruct any new law enforcement facilities at this time.
Capital Projects and Financing Plan
Spokene Velley is not planning to construct any new law enforcement facilities at this time.
4.4.12 School Facilfties
Four public school districts provide service within Spokane Valley: East Valley, West Valley,
Central Valley and Spokane School District 81. Spokane Valley must coordinate with each district
to ensure consistency between the City's plan and school districts' plans. There are also a number
of private schools that provide service to Spokane Valley area children.
Inventory of Existing Facllltles
The School District Map, found at the end of this Chapter, shows district boundaries and locations
of al) public schools within Spokane Valley. Tables 4.19 through 4.21 shows capacities of all
schools located within Spokane Valley.
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009~ Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 27 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
School districts use portable classrooms at some school sites as interim measures to house
students until permanent facilities can be built. Portable units are not included in capacky figures.
School capacity figures are reported by the Washington State Superintendent of Public Instruction
end are based on square footage per student.
Table 4.19 Central Valley School Inverttory
Elementary School Sq. Ft Area ~ Capactty
AdBrrts 46,879 621
Summlt (Fomtidiy Blake) 34,823 438
Broadwrey 40,648 499
Chester ` 38,388 480
I C3reenacrea ~ 55,875 680
Keystone 33,669 421
Llberty Lake 60,477 756 I
McQonsld i 46,504 663
i
Opporttmity ~ 42,388 521
Ponderosa 51,377 642
~ Progress 37,573 452
South Plnes 45,956 499
Sundse 63,673 662
Unhrereity 37,867 455
Tota! Elbmentary Permener►t Fscllitles 626,097 7,587
Junior High Schools ' Sq. FG Area Capaclry
gowdlgh 74,738 743
Evergreen 76.075 761 I
Greenaues 91,803 908
Horizon 84,795 ~ 838
North Piries 106,368 1,044
Tota/ JunJor Hlgh Permdnerrt FecllRies 432,779 4,284
Senlor Hlgh Schools ' Sq. Ft Area Capacity
Central Valley " 239,540 1,888
Unlversity 239,640 1,986
Tota! Senlor H18h Fadlliles i 4 78, 080 3, 9 74
Source: Cernral Valby School Dlatrid ~
- - -
Table 4.20 Esst Valley Schoollnvsntory
Elementary School Sq. FL Area CapacFty
East Farms 47,047 679
Otis Orchards 51,789 629 ~
L SkWew - 42,140 509
. .
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200,9, Chapter4 - Capital Facitities
Page 28 of 58
_ ,
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Tabla 4.20 East Valley Schoal Inventory
Etementary School Sq. Ft Area Capacity
7rent 58,482 713
TreMwood j 47,274 673
Total EbmenMry P+emmnertt Fadlffies ' 246,732 3.003
Junior Hlgh Schools 8q. Ft Area Capaclty
! 84,561 , 831
Esst Valley
Mountnln View 82,544 816
Tots! JuMor Hlgfi Permenent Facl►llks 167,105 1, 647
Sanior High 8chools 3q. FL Area Capacfty
East Valley 203,248 1,686
Totsl Sen/a Hiyh FadOes ~ 203,248 1,688
Source: Washington State SuperiMendent of PubUc InatrucUon
Tabio 4.21 West Valley School Inventory
Elementary School ~ Sq. FL Area i Capactty
MilMrood Ear1y Chf{dhood Ctr. 27.164 340
Neas 33,440 418
Orchard Center 34,094 426
Pasadena Park 34,002 425
Seth yyoodw8b 35,841 449
Total EJemenlary Permenenf Facilitles 164.641 Z058
Middle Schoots ! Sq. FL Area I Capacity
Centennfal 89,870 875
West Valley City School , 30,258 307
Tota! Junlor High Permar►errt Fscliities 120.128 1,182
8enior High Schoots Sq. FL Area Capacity
West Valley 149,128 1,207
Spokane Valley 13.802 116
Tots! Senlor H1Qh Facuit3es 163,030 1,323
Source: West Valley School Dlstrict
Level of Service
The Countywide Planning Policies for Spokane County requires that all jurisdictions adopt a Level
of Service standard for schools. Spokane Valley defers this responsibility to the individual school
districts providing service within the City. Individual school districts may request thet Spokane
Valley adopt a Level of Service standard in future updates to the Capital Facilities Element.
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 29 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Forecast of Future Needs
Centrai Vallev School District
The Central Valley School District (CVSD) is experiencing a period of high growth in student
population, particularly tawards its eastem boundary. Liberty Lake and Greenacres Elementary
Schools are currenUy over capacity. In response to this growth, the District initiated its 'Community
Linkages° planning process in the fall of 2004 to develop strategies and altematNes for
accommodating its present and future students. ~
The committee developed student population projections through the 2008/2009 school year for the
entire district by analyzing growth trends in student population, building pennit activity and
proposed housing developments. The data will be used to guide decisions on where to locate
school facilities. Table 4.23 shows the number of students enrolled in Central Valley Schools in
2005 for each school in the District and projections through the 2008-09 school year. In 2005,
11,480 students were enrolled in CVSD schools, with 9,363 of those students living within the City
of Spokane Valley. ;
Table 4.23 Centra! Valley Enrollment ProJecdon
3tudent New ProJecied Student Student
School Ariendance Area Enrollmerrt 2005 Enrollment In
2008•2009 Increaae
,
Elementery Schools ~
Broadway ' 482 517 25
Progress i 291 311 20
Opportunlry I 339 368 27 ~
Adams 466 603 37
Untverslty 419 435 18
South Plnes 331 332 1 McDonald 356 364 , 8
a
Sunrise 480 532 42
Ponderosa 334 337 3
Chester 322 352 30
Greenacres I 688 686 88
Llberty Lake 727 876 149
Total 5155 5611 456
Mldd/e Schools
North pines ' 525 551 26
I
Bcwdtsh 574 589 15
Horizon 440 462 22
Evergfeen 678 630 62
Greenaut,s 644 757 113
Total 2761 2989 I 228 '
H/gh Schools
Ln~~ High 1922 2055 133
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 30 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprenensive Pian
Central Valiey High 1642 1804 ' 162
Total ' 3584 3869 296
i
~
Total S'tudertt Enroliment i 11,480 ' 12,459 ~ 979
Souroe: Centrsl Valley Unkagea Gommtttae - John 8ottelll, Spokane County GIS
- -
The following table shows enrollment projections for Central Valley School District from the
Washington State Superintendent of Public Instruction. The table provides historic and projected
school enrollments for the years 2001 through 2010.
Table 4.24 Central Valley School Enrollment
Actual Enrollment ProJectsd Enrollment
Grade 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 ~ 2006 2007 2008 2008 2010
K- 6 5,873 5,817 5,965 8,272 6,433 6,686 6,880 7,332 7,697 i 7,985
7-8 1,600 1,823 1,819 1,617 1,899 1,842 1,900 1,857 1,826 2,090
8-1 Z 3,410 3,544 3,555 3,802 3,653 3,695 3,788 3,789 3,828 3,862
K-1211,083 11,184 11,339 11,691 11,985 12,323 12,668 13,018 13,451 13,837
Source: Washington State Superintendent of Public InstrucUon
East Vallev School District
East Valley School District has experienced a significant decline in enrollment in recent years. In
1999, enrollment peaked at just under 4,700 students down to 4,355 students enrolled in the fall of
2004. The following table indicates that East Valley will continue to lose students through the year
2010.
Table 4.26 Eaat Valley School Enrollment
Actual Enrollment ProJected Enrollment
Orade 2001 2002 2003 2004 2006 2006 ' 2007 2008 2009 2010
i
K• 6 'I 2.355 2,288 2,167 2,139 2,082 ' 2,022 I 1,974 I 1,864 1,931 i 1,817
7-8 - 743 735 732 716 690 881 659 699 672 564
i
9-12 1,692 1,565 1,544 1,600 1,396 1,354 1,322 1,337 1,292 1,217
K-12 - 4,690 4,688 4,443 4,355 4.168 ' 4,057 3,955 3,900 3,795 3,898
L!!WW: Wsshington State Superintandent of Publlc Instrudion
-
East Valley Schoo) District estimates that out of 4,240 total students enrolled in the Dlstrict in
September, 2005, 2,378 lived within the City of Spokane Valley.
West Vallev School District
West Valley School District has grown in student population consistently since 1998 and is
projected to continuing growing through the year 2010, as shown in Table 4.25.
Tabte 4.26 Weat Valley School Enrollment
Actual Enrollment Projected Enrollment
Grad• 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
i
K- 6 1,591 1,652 1,614 1,6$1 1,605 1,610 I 1,832 1,710 1,728 1,750
7-8 ~ 6/~ 586 575 628 542 660 ~ 567 b03 ' 619 ' 689
~ ~ - -
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200,9~ Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 31 of 58
Ciry of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Table 4.26 West Valley School Enrollment
Actusl Enroilment Projected Enrollrrtent .
8-12 1,469 1,502 1,603 1,634 1,510 1,538 1,554 i 1,559 1,576 1,493
K-12 3,605 3,620 3,692 3,643 3,657 3,708 3,753 3,772 3,823 3,832
Source: Washington State Superlntendent of Public IRStructlon
,
Locatlons and Capacities of Future Facilities
Central Vallev School District
The most urgent need for the CVSD is to add more elementary classroom space in the east end of
the District. The District recently acquired two properties in the north Greenacres area for a new
elementary school. The District will need to construct a new high school and middle school in the
20-year time frame of this comprehensive plan. The district has a site for a middle school adjacent
to the Liberty Lake Elementary School. A number of elementary schools need to be completely
remodeled, including Opportunity, Greenacres and Ponderosa.
East Vallev School District
East Valley is not planning to construct any new facilities within the six year time frame of this
capital facilities plan. Future upda#es to this plan will incorporate new capftal projects.
West Vallev School District
West Valley is remodeling its High School and will add elementary school classroom space.
Capital Projects and Financing Plan
West Valley School District passed a$35 million bond measure in 2004 that is being used to
remodel West Valley High School, construct new elementary school classrooms and a new
gymnasium.
Central Valley School District is in the process of developing a Capital Improvement and Financing
Plan.
4.4.13 Sewer Service
Background
In 1983, Spokane County initiated an ambitious program to bring sewers to houses and businesses I
located in the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA). Since that time, over 17,000 residences and
businesses in the greater Spokane Valley area have been connected to the County's sewer
system. Spokane County has invested nearly $200 million in sewer construction countywide to
date. Continued sewer construction in Spokane Valley will cost enother $74 million through the
year 2010 when the County's Septic Tank Elimination Program (STEP) is completed. This figure
does not include costs for a new wastewater treatment plant, which is discussed later in this
section.
Upon Incorporation, the City of Spokane Valley entered into an interlocal agreement giving
Spokane County lead agency authority to provide sewer seroice. At this time, Spokane County and
Spokane Valley elected officials are exploring the options for the possible assumption of the Valley
sewer system. However, no decisions have been made regarding the transfer of responsibility and
ownership of Valley sewers. This section of the Capital Facilities Plan assumes that Spokane
County will continue to own and operate the sewers in Spokane Valley. The CFP will be updated
as necessary to incorporate future changes.
Comprehensive Wastewater Management Plan
In 1996, the County adopted an Interim Comprehensive Wastewater Management Plan (CWMP).
The intent of the CWMP was to develop strategies to expedite the sewer program for proteckion of
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 32 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
the Aquifer, and to satisfy regulations established by the Washington State Departments of Heatth
(DOH) and Ecology (DOE) and the Spokane County Heatth District.
In 2001, Spokane County updated the CWMP, which focused on redefining priority sewer areas
and conforming to requirements of the Growth Management Act (GMA). Most significantly, the
CWMP updated population and wastewater flow forecasts and produced a revised Capital
Improvemerrt Program (CIP).
Wastewater Facilities Plan
Along with the CWMP, Spokane County adopted a Wastewater Facilities Plan (WFP) in 2001 that
identified wastewater facilities end programs required to meet the long-term sewer needs of the
County. The WFP focuses on developing a long-term wastewater management strategy for the
County. The WFP provides en in-depth analysis of various wastewater treatment technologies
available, in addition to exploring the wide range of related environmental considerations. Public
participation was fully integrated into this extensive planning effort.
Wastewater Treatment
Wastewater is conveyed through Spokane County's sewer system to the City of Spokane Riverside
Par1c Water Reclamation Facility (RPWRF) for treatment and discharge into the Spokane River. In
1982, Spokane County and the City of Spokane signed an irrtedocal egreement wherein the County
purchased ten million gallons per day (mgd) of capacity in the RPWRF. Spokane CouMy is
currently using nearly eight mgd of its contracted capacity. A key component of the WFP is to
develop a new Spokane County Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant (SCRWTP) to serve
wastewater genereted in the greater Spokane Valley region.
The WFP explores the following treatment altematives:
• Discharge of treated wastewater effluent to the Spokane River, using one or more new
treatrnent plants between Liberty Lake and the City of Spokane.
• Discharge of treated wastewater effluent to the Little Spokane River, providing flow
augmentation in the Little Spokane River to help meet minimum stream flow needs.
• Use of treated end reclaimed wastewater for irrigation of agricultural lands, golf courses,
school grounds and parks.
• Use of treated and reclaimed wastewater for creation of wetlands.
• Underground storage of treated and reclaimed wastewater for subsequent use for irrigation
or release to streams for flow augmentation during critical low-flow periods.
. Recharge of the Spokane Aquifer with treated wastewater effluent, with the co-mingled
water being available for all uses including potable water supplies.
• Discharge of wastewater to the Liberty Lake treatment plant for treatment and subsequent
discharge to the Spokane River.
In June 2004, Spokane County amended its WFP to provide supplemental information related to
water quality of the Spokane River, edditional site-specific detail for the proposed treatment plant
location and a report on the progress of key implementation activities.
Site S ction
During the development of the WFP, prior to Spokane Valley's incorporation, Spokane County
engaged in an intensive public participation program to determine the most appropriate location for
a new wastewater treatment plant. It was determined that the ideal location would be on the
westem end of the Velley within close proximity to the Spokane River and large enough to allaw for
future plant expansions (15 to 20 acres in size).
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated Oi-07-200,9, Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 33 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Spokane County solicited nominations from the public and reviewed its land use database to
identify potential parcels. Fifteen sites were initially identified end subjected to a thorough
screening process. The sites were evaluated by a technical committee consisting of civil engineers,
biologists, geo-engineers and land use planners. The selection process was monitored by a citizen
focus group and included three public hearings to ensure continuous public participation.
At the end of the process, two sites, Alki/Fancher (close to the Fairgrounds) and the old Stockyards
site (on Market Street in the City of Spokane), were selected for further environmental review. A
Supplementel Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) was prepared to evaluate the potential
environmental impacts on each site and conveyance routes for raw sewage and treated effiuent
However, it was determined that the AlkilFancher site could not be secured in time for site
development. Therefore, the Playfair Race Track site was selected for further environmental
evaluation.
After thorough review, and two more public hearings in early 2004, the Stockyards site was chosen
as the preferred site to locate a new treatment plant. It has not been detennined if the new
treatment plant will be constructed, owned and operated by Spokane County, the City of Spokane
Valley, or by a special purpose govemmental body.
Inventory of Exlsting Faclllties
Sewer facilities within Spokane Valley are a system of pipes and pumping stations that move
unVeated sewage to the City of Spokane Riverside Park Water Reclamation Facility (RPWRF).
The following tables provide an inventory of sewer facilities in the Valley.
Table 4.27 Spokane Valley Pump Statlons
Station P~mp~ Horsepower , Stand-by Power Pump Capaclty (gpm)
Ella 3 89 Yes No 2,600
i i .
Mldilome I 2 5 No Yes 185
~
Mirebeau 2 ' 10 Yes No ~ 280
Ridgemont 2 ; 5 Yes Yes ~ 150
~
Rtverwatk 2 - 16 Yes i No 1 300
Spregue - - 2 - , 10 - No - - No - 920 -
gpm = gallons per minute Souroe: Spokane County Utilities Department
Table 4.28 Spokane Val{ey tnterceptors Level of SerVice
Stand-by Capaclty The Regional Minimum Level of Service Standards state
Intercepto~ PoWer (9pd) that incorporated areas will be provided with wastewater
South Va11ey No 30,e00,000 collection and transport systems in accordance with the
adopted sewer concurrency requirements of the
tvormvaney No 10,150,000 jurisdiction. Spokane Valley requires all new
9Pd = gattons per day source: spokane ' development to be seroed with public sewer. Only
couMy uts. oepc. existing residential, commercial and industrial lots may be
served by septic systems/drain fields (epproved by the
Spokane County Health District) and only if public sewer is unavailable.
Forecast of Future Needs
Spokane County currently has about 26,223 customers within its sewer system area. Since some ~
customers generate more flow than others, it is common to define an Equivalent Residential Unit
(ERU) as a way to project future flows and to set the cost sewer service rates. Spokane County
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 34 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
figures an ERU to be 900 cubic feet of water per month, or about 225 gallons per day. The 26,223
customers account for 38,831 ERUs.
Table 4.28 8pokane Valley 8ewer Lines and Manhcles
(3ravlry Malns Total Length (f't)
6` 1,282
8' 1,117,747
10' 125,782
12" 52,763
15' 39,820
18' 34,137 21' 14,603
24' 29,885
27' 12,585
30' 14,782
I 36' 18,807
42" 20,938
48` 11,088
64" 16,544
Totai Length 1,610,763 ft a 286 ml I
Manhole Covera 6,696
Souroe: Spokane County Utifides Department ~
The following tabie shows that Spokane Valley Gccoun±s for 28,396 ERUs o- i -3=-"- o` tnr County s
total ERUs.
Table 4.30 Spoicane County SewQr Customers and ERUs ~
Customer Type City oi Spokane Valiey Areas Remalning County Total for County
Vailey Outslde of City Senrice Areas Senrlce Areas
Accounts ERUs Accounts ERUs Accounts ERUa Accounts ERUs
Single Family 15,960 16,353 1,924 1,937 6,329 6,414 24,213 24,704
Muiti-Famity 377 6,043 88 137 127 948 i 592 i 6,128
Commercial 1,217 6,827 6 30 186 969 1,409 7,826
Mobile Home Parka 9 173 0 0 0 0 9 173
TOTAL 17,663 Ie,38s 2,018 4104 6,642 8,331 26,223 58,831
Source: Spokane County Utllitles Department
The most urgent need for the Spokane region is to increase the capacity to treat wastewater.
Spokane County adopted a new policy in 2005 making connection to the sewer system voluntary
for new sewer construction areas as a part of the Septic Tenk Elimination Program (STEP). The
County estimates that 50% of the parcels within the STEP area will connect voluntarily in the year
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200D Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 35 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
following sewer construction. Table 4.31 shows the County's historic and projected totai
connections to the sewer system through the year 2010.
Tabte 4.31 Connectlons to County Sewer
Septic Tank New Tohl
Ytar
Elimination Cortstruction Connactions
2002 1,490 609 2.099
2003 I 1,407 665 1,972 ~
2004 1,573 474 2,047
2005 1,230 682 1,912
2006 696 685 1,181
2007 643 585 1,228 I
2008 654 585 1,139
2009 781 685 1,366
2010 691 585 1,276
A two percent annual growth rate is used to project the amount of sewer flow that new construction
will add to the system. Using these assumptions, the County expects to reach its contracted ten
mgd capacity at the City of Spokane Reclamation Facility by the year 2014, as shown in the
following table.
Table 4.32 Spokane County Wastewater Treatment Plant Capactty ProJettions
Year 2004 2006 2006 2007 ' 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 ~ 2013 2014
Flow (mgd) 7.3 7.8 1 818.3 8.6 88 9.1 9.3 9.6 9.9 10.1
,
Source: Spokene Counry Utilttles Depertment Nata: These tre proJected capscitles tor Spokane County. The City d Spolane Valley
does not have ita own allotted capecity. Spokane Vadiey does not puarantee that wastewiter espacfty wlll be ova8ahie for new oonstrudlon In
the itftro.
Locations and Capacides of Future Facilitles
Sewer Construction
The purpose of the County's Septic Tank Elimination (STEP) program is to expedite the
construction of sanitary sewers and dramatically reduce the number of on-site sewage treatment
facilities over the Spokane-Rathdrum Aquifer, and to satisfy regulations established by the State
Departments of Heath and Ecology, Spokane County Heaith District and other regulatory agencies.
The Sewer Projects Map found at the end of this chapter shows the areas where sewer will be
extended as a part of the STEP program over the next six years.
Spokane County anticipates that the constn.iction of all sewers within the STEP projed areas will be
completed by the end of year 2010. The Sewer Project Priority Map shaws areas that have had
sewer lines installed within Spokane Valley and areas that are scheduled to have sewer lines
installed by 2010.
The industrial area in the far northeast comer of the City currently does not have public sewer
service. To encourage economic development and job creation, Spokane Valley may consider
extending public sewer to this area.
Wastewater Treatment Plant
The Spokane Courity Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant (SCRWTP) will be located at the old
Stockyards site inside the City of Spokane. The SCRWTP is scheduled to be operational by the
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Cap'rtal Facilities
Page 36 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
year 2012. Construction will occur in two phases to meet projected capacity requirements through
the year 2025. Phase 1 will provide a maximum capacity of eight mgd and should be completed
by 2012. Phase 2 will provide an additianal four mgd capacity. Depending on the rate of growth,
Phase 2 may be completed as early as 2015.
Capital Projects and Flnancing Plan
Wastewater TreaUnent
Spokane County has progremmed capital expenditures for its share of upgrading the City of
Spokane Riverside State Par1c Reclamation Facility (RPWRF) for the years 2006-2011, as shown in
Table 4.33. The upgrades are required to meet State and Federal sewage treatment guidelines.
Spokane County is elso moving forward with plans to construct end operate a new Wastewater
Treatment Plant at the old Stockyards site. Phase 1 construction costs are estimated at $132
million; Phase 2 is estmated at $42 million, bringing the total to $201 million for the new treatment
plant. Capital costs for the years 2006-2011 are shown in Table 4.34.
Table 4.33 Costs tor City ot Spokane Riveralde 8tata Par1c ReclamaUon Facility (RPWRF) Upgrades
ProJect 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 ' Total
Water Quality Upgrade at RPWRF $6,100 $7,300 51,004 $2,200 $8,700 ' $8,700 $34,004
Notes:
1. The 2006-2011 estimate:s were provided by the City of Spokane.
2. Funds tor the RPWRF Upgrades will come from the Wastewater Treatment Pfant Fund and C3eneral Fadlltlea
Fund
3. Assumes effluent filtratlon compleled by 2012 to compy wlth dlasolved axygen tatsl maximum dally load (TMDL)
4. EaUmates fn Thousands of Dollars
Source: Spokane Courtty Six-Year Sewer ConstrucHon Capital Improveme►rt Program - 2006 through 2011
Table 4.34 Coats for Now Wastewater Troatment Faclltttes
ProJect 2008 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Englneering, Management $500 $500 $500 S500 $250 $250 $2,500
and Legel Servioes
Land - Punp Stetions and $gpp $1,400 $500 $O $0 $O $2,400
Troahnent Plant
Conveyance-
Desi9~~~~ild $O $875 $2,000 $9,000 $9,000 $O $20,876
ConsWWon Coat
TreeUnent Plant -
Des1gnBufld Construdion $O $4,000 $9.260 $18,760 S20,000 S20,000 $72,000
Cwt
Tctata $1,000 s6►TTb S1 2,260 I t28,260 i $29,250 i20,260 $87,776
Mnual Debt 8ervica ;
PaymeM trom Resen►es $1,000 $O $0 $0 i0 I i0
Cumulativs 6ond Sales :0 ' $6,775 i19,025 i42,276 ;76,625 $96,775
Anrwal Debt Service i0 $667 t1,592 $3,958 $6,404 $8,098
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2400 Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 37 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Table 4.34 Costs for New Waatewater Troatment Faclifdes
ProJect 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Notes:
1. The ebove esbmates are based upon the following assumptiona:
- New 8 rntlUon gpd plant on the Stodryarda a1te, wfth flaws atarUrig in 2012.
- Effluent fiitratfon will meet the requirements of the dissotved oxygen TMDL.
- Outfall to Rebecca St. from the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWfP) site.
- Pump Stabon 8 Force Main from Spokane Valley Interceptor to VWYfP.
- Pump Station 8 Foroe Main from North Velley lnterceptor to WVYfP.
- DeslgNBuild/Operate coritred for the WWTP.
- OesignlBld/Build pubiic wortcs contract br the corneyance projeds.
2. 'Mnual Debt Service' la assumed to commence for a gfven expenditure in the year following the expenditure.
The amourit ahown for 'Annuel Debt SeMoe' indudes the esdmated debt service for cumulative expenditures end ~
assumes the annual sale of 20-year bonds et 5.59b (ntereat rates. A poRlon oi the annusl costs may be pafd irom
available reaervea, rather than hom bond proceeds. For those years where lhe 'Cumulatlve Bond Setea' ks listed at
I
$0, it is assumed that the previous years expenditures were pald trom reaerves. The primary sourcea of funding ere
the General Fadiities Fund end Wastewater Treatment Plarn Fund.
3. EsUmate in thousands of doliars.
Source: Spokane County Six-Year Sewer Construction Capital Improvement Program - 2006 through 2011
Sewer Construction
The following table represents Spokane County's adopted sewer construction program for 2006
through 2011. The Sewer Projects Map, found at the end of this chapter, shows the location of the
sewer projects for the greater Spokane Valley, both inside and outside the City boundary.
I
Teble 4.36 8pokane County Septic Tank Elimination Program Slx-Year Financtng Ptan
Projects 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
VaNey Sewer Constructlon' $17.063 $12,312 $17,197 ' $24,639 $22,989 50 $94,200 I
North Spokane Sewer ConstruWon $O $1,357 $4,240 $O $2,265 50 $7,862
- - - - -
Miscellaneous $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $3,000
Total $17,563 $14, 169 $21,937 $25.139 $25,754 $500 $105,062
Funding Saurcea ~
State Grant $3,750 ~ $3,750 $3,760 $3,750 i $3,750 $O $18,750
General FaclliUes Fund $1,333 $2,623 52,603 $666 $3,019 $O $10,144
Capftal FadlfUea Rate Prepayments $872 $777 $1,134 $1,038 $1,145 I $O 54,968
Bonds $3,488 $3,108 S4,536 $4,153 $4.579 0 $19,864
Subsidy Funding lrom Reserves $8,120 $4,011 ~ $9,914 $15,632 $13.261 $600 $51,338
Totai - - $17,563 $14.169 $21,937 $25.139 $25,754 5500 ~105,062
1 ,
•Note: Thls table ropresenta proJeds both inside and outside the City oi Spokane Valley
Amounts are bimes $1,000
, Source: Spokane County Six-Year Sewer Conatrudion Capita! Improvemertt Program - 2006 throqh 2011
Spokane Valley will continue the commitment to replace septic systems with public sewers and will
examine the feasibility of extending public sewer to unserved commercial and industrial areas to
encourage economic development and job creation.
4.4.14 Sol id Waste
In 1988, the intergovemmental agency known as the Spokane Regional Solid Waste System
(System) was foRned by intedocal agreement between the City of Spokane, Spokane County and
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200,9, Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 38 of 58
City of Spokane Valiey Comprehensive Plan
all other cities and towns within the County. The System is responsible for implementing solid
waste management pians, planning and developing specific waste management programs and
updating solid waste plans for the entire County. The System is managed by the City of Spokane,
which uses its structure to carry out the various solid waste management programs for our region.
In Spokane Valley, solid waste services are provided by private haulers licensed by the Washington
Utility and Transportation Commission (W.U.T.C.) through franchise egreements. Waste
Management of Spokane provides residential and commercial garbage services and weekly
curbside recycling collection; Sunshine Disposal provides only commercial services. At this time,
Spokane Valley residents are allowed to self-haul their garbage to an appropriate dumping site.
Inventory of Existing Facllitles
The Regional Solid Waste System includes a Waste to Energy facility located at 2900 South
Geiger, and two recycling/transfer stations. One of the stations is located within Spokane Valley at
3941 N. Sullivan Road south of Trent and across from the Spokane Industrial Perk; the other is
located in north Spokane County at the intersection of Elk-Chattaroy Road end Highway 2.
Landfills are necessary to provide disposal for solid waste that cannot be recycled or incinerated, or
that exceeds the capacity of the WTE Facility. The Spokane County Regional Health District
licenses six pdvately owned landfills in Spokane County.
Level of Servlce
The minimum Regional Level of Service Standards requires solid waste services to meet all State
and Federal regulations.
Forecast of Future Needs
Spokane Velley is participating on the update of the Spokane County Waste Management Plan
(SCWMP). The SCWMP update process will determine future needs for solid waste disposal.
Locations and Capacldes of Future Facliitles
The updated Spokane County Solid Waste Management Plan will provide information on future
regional solid waste facilities.
Flnance Plan
The updated Spokane County Solid Waste Management plan will include a financing plan for future
regional solid waste facilities.
4.4.16 Stormwater Facllitfes
Stormwater runoff in Spokane Va11ey flows to a combination of public and private facilities. In
developed areas, runoff flows down street gutters and is disposed through drywells in public road
rights-vf-way, drywells on private property and gressy swales with overflow drywells in easements
on private property.
There are advantages and disadvantages to relying on on-site facilities for all stormwater
manegement. One advantage is that on-sfte facilities are typically constructed with private funds
and can be integrated into the development as a green space amenity. However, on-site facilities
are sometimes not well maintained. Their capacity may be diminished over time or they may fail
entire(y during large runoff events. On-site facilities may take up large portions of a development
site, thereby reducing the effective density that can be accommodated in that area.
In 2004, the Spokane Valley City Council created a stomnwater ublity to develop and maintain storm
drainage systems on publlc land. To create revenues for the stormwater utility operetions, the
Council adopted an annual fee per Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU). Residential ERUs are based
on the number of single-family dwellings, while Commercial ERUs are based on the square footage
of impervious surface associated with a business or commercial development.
I Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capita) Facilities
Page 39 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Inventory of Existing Facilities
Spokane Velley's inventory of stormwater facilities, most of which are integral to the safe function of
our street system, consists of about 5,600 drywells, 928 swales six detention ponds, and one
retention pond. Other facilities include curb inlets, bridge drains, and culverts, all of which require
monitoring and maintenance. The retention pond, located at Dishman-Mica Road. and 32nd Ave.,
was constructed as a part of a road project and provides a disposal point for water flowing from
Chester Creek.
Level of Service
The Spokane County Board of Commissioners adopted new regional level of service standards for
stormwater in 2004 as a part of the Countywide Planning Policies update. The standards reflect
current best practices that are established in adopted stormwater design guidelines. Spokane
Valley follaws said guidelines in reviewing and approving new development and is therefore in
compliance with the regional LOS standards for stormwater runoff.
Forecast of Future Needs
Spokane Valley will continue to use private, on-site treatment facilities for new development and will
install drywells, swales and other facilities as needed for new street improvement projects.
Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities
Location and capacities of future facilities is dependent on the location and size of new
development, future public street projects, and projects that will address current problem areas
within the City. Future updates to this Capital Facilities Plan will incorporate capital programming
for stormwater facilities.
Capital Projects and Flnancing Plan
The City currently charges a$20 annual stormwater utility fee per Equivalent Residential Unit
(ERU) to generate revenues for stormwater facility engineering, maintenance and administration.
The stormwater fee is expected to generate $1.2 million annually.
Transportation FaciliUes
Inventory of Existing Facilities
This section of the Capital Facllities Plan includes transportation facilities within Spokane Valley,
including streets, bridges, paihways end sidewalks. Street maintenance is not included es a part of
the Capital Facilities Plan.
Spokane Valley is responsible for about 455 miles of public roads, including 51 miles of Urban
Principal Arterials, 61 miles of Urban Minor Arterials, 44 miles of Urban Collectors, and 298.85
miles of Local Access Streets. Table 4.36 provides a list of all arterial intersections within Spokane
Valley.
Level of Service
Spokane Valley uses arterial intersection delay as its transportation level of senrice (LOS). This
LOS is based on travel delay and is expressed as letters "A' through "F", with 'A° being the highest
or best travel condition and 'F' being the lowest or worst condition. The lowest acceptable LOS for
signalized arterial intersections is set at 'D'; the lowest scceptable LOS for un-signalized arterial
intersections is set at "E". This LOS standard conforms to the latest ed'rtion of the Highway
Capacity Manual, SpecJal Report 209, published by the Transportation Research Board.
Table 4.36 provides a six and twenty year level of service anatysis for all arterial intersections in
Spokane Valley. The analysis uses the regional transportation model prepared and maintained by
the Spokane Regional Transportation Council as its basis for forecasting future intersection
volumes. Levels of service calculations follow Highway Capac'rty Manual methodologies. The last
column in the table crass-references to capital projects listed in Table 4.38. These projects will
address capacity deficiencies at the corresponding intersection.
I Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200,9) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 40 of 58
.
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Tablo 4.36 IMersecUon Level ot 3enrice Anatysls
Z007-
Interssctlon Count Control 2006 2011 Mtd2011gated 2025 Miti2026gated 2012
LOS LOS !OS* L03 LOS* ProJect
~
t 4th / SuiilYen 2005 Signal C B p i
• I
2 4th / Thierman 2006 4-way stop A B C
~ 3 4th / Universlty 2005 Signal C C c
' 2000 2-way saop D E E F F 33 '
sCc* B C C F F 1e,40
LI.J-~ z„ie(IYl B ~ c
7 8th / Evergreen 2003 Signal A A q
E 8th I McDonaid 2006 2-way atop 0 E F
E 81h l Park 2006 2-way stop C C C D C 1e
10 8th / Pines (SR-27) 2001 2-way stop F F F
8th / Suqlvan 2002 Signal 6 8 c
12 8th / Thiermen 2000 2-way stop C E F 1 e
13 81h / UI11veBily 2005 Signal 8 B g
14 16th I Adams 20e1 4-way stop A B p
15 16th / Bowdish 2005 4-way atop C C C F D 33
' 1e 16tfi / Olshman-Mica 2004 sipnw e 8 8
17 16th ! Evenpreen 2003 Signal B A A 36
1e 16th / McDortafd 2005 4-way scop B s c 19 161Ft / SR 27 2005 Signal D D p
22,42
20 16th / Sulltvan 2004 Signal 8 B C
21 1ft / Uf11VefElty 2000 Signal 8 B 8
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 41 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan '
~
Table 4.36 Intersactlon Level ot Servlcs Analysis
2007•
IrttersecUon Count Control 2006 2011 AA2011ttigated 2026 Mltigated 2025 2012
LOS LOS LOS' LOS LOS• ProJect
~
22 24th / Evergreen 2000 4-way stop A B B F F 36
23 24th / Sulliv8n 2004 Signal B B F
24 32nd / Adams 2001 2-way stop B C C
~
25 32nd J 8arlcer 2003 2-wey stop COUNTY COUNTY
26 32nd / Bowdish 2005 Signal B 8 B 8 B 33
27 32nd 1 Dishman-Mica 2002 2-waY stop B 8 6
28 32nd / Evergreen 2002 2-wey abop B e B C E 23,36
29 32f1d / pjneg 2005 Signal C C C
30 32nd / SR 27 2006 Signal C C 0
31 32nd / Sullivan 2004 2-way stop COUNTY COUNTY
~
32 32nd ! University ZOOS Signal B 8 8
, 33 Applew8y 1 Berker 2006 Signal C C C F F 1, 20, 24
34 M~lewaylDishman ~a6 Signal C c C
35 Appleway / Farr 2005 Signal D C C
36 Appleway I Paric 2005 Signal C C C
37 Appleway / Thietman 2005 Signal D E F
38 App18W8y / UnIVCrSIty 2005 Signal C B 8 6
39 Applewey I VI8te 2005 Signal B A A
40 Br08dVVay / AdSRts 2005 2-wey atop C E F e
41 Broadway / Argonne 2004 Signal A A 6 8 '
~
1
42 Bf08dW8y / BaWdISh 2005 Signal A A B 8
, Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 42 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Pian
Table 4.38 intenacdon Level oi Service Analysls
2007-
2005 2011 Z011 2026 2025 2012
Intersectlon CouM Control LOS LOS lOSM~ ' U~~ LOS LOS• ~it~gat°d Project
~
43 Broadway / Evergreen 2005 Signal C D E e
44 Broadway / Fancher 2002 Signal D D F
45 Bt08dW8y / FlOfe 2005 2-way stop C F F F F 26' u'
36
48 Bf08dvVey / MCDOneId 2005 Signal 8 B B 8
47 Bfoadwey / MLdlan 2004 Signal 9 B C e
48 Broadway / Park 2003 Signal D D C F C 10' 11'
25
49 Broadway / Pines 2005 Signal D f D F e,u
(SR-27)
so &oadway / suNvsn 2005 Signal o o F a
51 Br08dw8y / Thiermen 2005 Signal 8 C F
62 Broadway / Univeraity 2002 Signal A A A 8
_ 53 Broedwey / VtStB 2002 Signal A A A 8
, 54 Br08dVVBy ! Wfal-Msrt 2005 Signal 8 8 C
65 ~~l Pre-Mb(I 2003 Signal B B 8 '
Suiiivan
6e oiahhman-Mica / 2006 Signal s c o ~
Bowdish
57 Dishmeti-MICe / 2004 Signal C C C
Universtty-Schafer
68 Eudld (north) / Barker 2002 2-way atap B B B C C 28,32
59 Euclid (soutti) / Berker 2002 2-wey stnp e B 8 C C 32
50 Eudld / Flora (north) 2003 2-way seop e o F za
, et EucNd / Flore (south) 2003 2-way stcp c D F 2e
62 Eudid / Paric 2006 2-way •cop A e e
-
63 Eudid / Sullivan 2001 SIpnN C C C D C 30
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 43 of 58
1
City of Spokane Vatiey Comprehensive Pian
Tablo 4.361ntersection Levai ol8ervice Analysis
2007-
2006 2011 Z011 2026 2025 2012
Irttersactlon Count Control LOS LOS LOMIUS• LOS LOS• Mftigatad proJed
~
64 Indlarta / Evergreen 2004 Signal B C C
65 Indlana / Matl-East 2005 Signal B 9 C
88 II'Idletl8 / Mall-WESt 2005 Signal B B e
67 I rylana / Mirabeau 20~ Signal 8 8 6
68 ~i~ / Pi~iCS (SR- ~ Signal D C D 22
69 Indiana / Suilivan 2005 Signal C C E
70 Kieman-8 / Sullivan 2003 Signal B B C 30
71 Knox / Argonne 2004 Signal D D 0 18
72 Marisfleld / Pines Zoa 2-'"Sy F F C C 3,22
(SR-27) stop/slpne!
73 Mar(etta / Sullivan 2003 Signa► B C F
74 Mirabeau Pky / Pines 2006 2'"'Hy F F e e 3,22
(SR-27) stop/sipnal
75 Mission ! Adams 1699 2-way stop B B C
76 Mlssion ! Argaine 2005 Sipnal D 0 D
1
77 Miaaion / Barker 2005 s~~ 8i E F A e
7e Mission / Bowdish 1999 2-way stop C E F
79 Missfon / Evergreen 2002 Signal A A A
80 Misslon / McDonald 2002 Slpnei A A A
e1 Mission / Mullan 2005 Signal B 8 C
ez Mission / Partc 2002 Signal a e e B B 10
83 Mission / Pines 2002 Signal D E D F 22
84 Miaslon ! Suilfvan 2005 Slprnl C C F
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 44 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Pian
Tabte 4.36 Inter,secUon levei ol Servics Melysls
2007-
2Q05 2011 Z011 2826 2425 2012
Intars~tlon Count Corttrol LOS LOS M~g°~ LOS ~w88t~ Project
!OS• LOS' #
85 Misslon / Univeraity 2004 2-way stop C E F -
~
Be 1~m~ l 2004 Sipnd 0 D F 7;
,
87 S~~ rycentsr zoos 8 B c
Morttgomery I Zaoz s-w.y stoP o o F UniveraRy
F?uttc;r / Par}~ 2 r, C3 2-wsYstoP 6 B D
r~ 5a;tes--? St: ivar 2, 5 C4 :.;s, stop D F F 38 1
Sprague J Adams 2004 Signal 8 B C
Sprngue / Appleway 52 Ave- 2002 Signal B C F 31
c: orbin
,
43 Sprague / Argonne 2006 slgnal e e e
i
94 Spr8gtle / Befker 2005 4-wsy sbp B C 8 F F 24
,
95 SprdgUe / BOWdi8h 2005 Signal C D C D C 6
, es Sprague / Costco 2005 Sqnal e g
(east of Camahan) ~
97 SpfegUC / EVBfgfeCf1 2005 Signal C D C 0 C 6
, 9a SpraguelFerscher 2002 Signal D D D
99 Sprague ! FeR 2006 Signal A A A
100 Sprague I Flora ~698 Sipnal 8 C B F D 26
J ,
tot Sprague / Giilis- 2005 Signal C C C 6
102 Sprague / McDonald 2005 Signal D D C F C 6
103 Sprague ! Mullan 2005 Signal C e B
104 SpfBgliC / PSIi( 2005 Slpnal C B 8 11,26
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200D Chapter 4- Capita► Facilities
Page 45 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan -
Tsb{e 4.36 Intersectlon leval ot Service Matysis
2007-
Irttersectlon Count Control 2005 2011 Mitl2011gated 2025 Miti2025gated 2012
LOS LOS LOS• LOS LO5. ProJeci
~
105 2~e9ue / Pines (SR- Z~S Signal 0 E C F D 6.22
108 $prgQtlP. / Prp9reSS 2006 Signal C B B B B 31
107 Sprague / Stllliven 2005 Signal D E C F D 31
108 Sprague / Thkxman 2005 Sbnal 9 8 C
109 Sprague / Universtry 2006 Siprui o C D 6
,
110 Spf'dgue / Vi3t8 2005 Signal C A A
Trent (SR-290) / 2004 Signal D E F
Argonne
112 Trettt (SR-290) / 2004 2-way stop F F F B,C Bl1l
Berker
1113 Trertt (SR-290) / 2003 Signal B B C
Evergreen
14 Trertt (SR-290) / Zppp Signal C C C
Fancher
115 Trent (SR-290) / Flora 2003 2-way atop F F E BN
116 Trent (SR-290) / Pefk 2003 Signal B B B C 8 0, BTV
117 Trent (SR-290) I 2003 Signal E F D F F 22, BTV
Pfnea
J
li8 Trent (SR-280) / 2002 2-way stoP C D E
Progress
Trent (SR-290) / Inter-
119 UniVefSity 2005 2-way atop F F saclion BN
Removed
720 Trent (SR-280) / 2D05 Signal A 8 F D SO
Sullivan (North Ramp)
121 Trent (SR-290) / 2003 Signal 8 8 F 0 30
Sullivan(South Ramp)
122 TreM (SR-290) / Vfsta 2003 Signal 8 8 B BN
123 Wellesley / Evergreen 2045 4-way stop 8 8 C
124 Wellesley / Progress 2002 4-way stop C e B
125 Wellesley 1 Sulllvan 2002 4-way stap C F F F F 4,30
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 46 of 58
.
City of Spokane Valiey Comprehensive Plan
Table 4.361ntersection Levei of Service Malysh
Z007-
2005 2011 2011 2026 2G26 2012
IntersecUon Count Control LOS LOS LOS'
M~ge~ ProJed
~~ga~ LOS LOS'
*
No~e: Sas Table 4.38 for a liWnq d caphai improvement projeds.
1
Regional Level ot Service
The Countywide Ptanning Policies require that LOS standards be adopted in accordance with the
regional minimum level of service standards set by the Growth Management Steering Committee of
Elected Officials. The Steering Committee approved the use of comdor travel time for use in
establishing the regional transportation system.
The Spokane Regional Transportation Council is determining annual average corridor travel time
through a travel time study. This study is still in progress and corridor travel time Level of Senrice
standards will be adopted upon its completion.
Uses of Level of Servlce Standards
As measures of transportation effectiveness, LOS standards can help jurisdictions identify where
and when transportation improvements are needed, and when development or growth will affect
system operation. Level of service provides a standard below which a transportation facility or
system is not considered adequate.
Level of senrice standarcis can be used to evaluate the impact of proposed developments on the
suROUnding road system. They can also be used to identify problems, suggest remedial actions
and apportion costs between public and private sources. LOS standards are a comerstone in the
developmeM of equitable trafF'ic impact fee systems, which makes development pay some of the
costs for improvements to the transportation infrasUucture.
The Spokane Regionsl Transportation Council (SRTC) performed traffic modeling for the urban
area, considering future population grawth and distribution. This model examines the performance
of the entire urban transportation system. Improvements to provide for the increased traffic
volumes shown by the model at the adopted level of service standards, are included in this plan.
More information on the transportation modeling based on future land use assumptions is contained
in Chapter 3, Transportation.
Relationshfp to Concurrency Management
Concurrency involves matching public facilities and new development. The concept of cancuRency
predates the Growth Management Ac# for some public facilities, specffically through SEPA
mitigation requirements. The GMA extends concurrency to transportation facilities by requiring that
new development be served by edequate roads and public transportation service, and that
development is not permitted to cause these trensportation facilities to operate below level of
senrice standards that are adopted by local govemments in their comprehensive plans. 'Adequate
capacity refers to the maintenance of concurrency' (WAC 365-195-835).
State Transportation Facllitles
The Growth Management Act requires local jurisdictions to include inventory and Level of Senrice
information for state transportation facilities in their Comprehensive Plans. State facilities are
divided into two categories: Highways of Statewide Signficance (HSS), and Regionally Significant
Highways (non-HSS). The Grawth Management Ad requires non-HSS facilities to be subject to
concurrency. The following table lists State highways serving Spokane County.
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 47 of 58
City of Spokane VaUey Comprehensive Plan
State Transportation Level of Service
The Washington State Departrnent of Transportation Table 4.37 Stste Hlghways ~
(WSDOT) requires state transportation facilities in
urban areas (inside the UGA) to mairitain a minimum Hlghway ~esc~tptton Deaignation
Level of Seroice standard "D.' In rural areas i-so tnterstate Hss
(outside the UGA), the minimum LOS standard is - L -
"C." Those areas iying outside the UGA that may sR-27 Pines Road jNa,-HSs
have urban characteristics can be evaluated by the SR-290 Tront Avemie ~ Non-HSS
WSDOT in conjunction with the City on a case-by- . Hss a Highway of Statewlde Slgniflcance
case basis to determine which standard is the most Non-HSS = Reglonelly SlgniflcarYt Hlghway
appropriate fit.
,
Intergovernmental Coordination
Transportation plans were distributed for comment to all jurisdictions that may be impacted by, or
impact, Spokane Valley's transportation system, including adjacent towns and cities, Spokane
County, Spokane Transit Authority, Washington State DOT, and Spokane Regional Transportation
Council (SRTC). SRTC has overall responsibility for intergovemmental coordination of
transportation plans. Each jurisdiction in the region must submit transportation plans to SRTC for
inclusion in the Metropolitan Transportation Plan. SRTC responsibilities include: 1) Certifying the
transportation elements of comprehensive plans adopted by the County, cities and towns in the
region for consistency with the Metropolitan Transportation Plan; 2) Maintaining consistency
between infrastructure plans and land use development plans, and 3) Reviewing LOS thresholds
for transportation facilities in the Spokane Region.
SRTC is also responsible for monitoring and evaluating the performance of regional transportation
facilities es affected by land use and transportation improvement decisions. Concurrency
management is linked to the planning process. Any amendments to the comprehensive plans
require a concurrency management system analysis and must meet thresholds before their
adoption. SRTC will annually assess the regional transportation system wfith respect to regional
concurrency.
Capital Facilities Projects and Financing
Capital Projects
Table 4.38 contains a complete list of transportation related capital projects for the years 2008
through 2013, totaling over $95 million. The City updates the six year TIP throughout the year as
project priorities end funding changes. This Plan adopts by reference any updates to the TIP
occurring between Plan update cycles. The current TIP is available for viewing online at
www.spokanevalley.org. These projects eddress capacity issues at intersections and safety
improvements. Following is a discussion of potential funding sources.
Funding Sources
Funding for the operation and expansion of the City's transportation system falls into several
categories, which include federal, state and city funds. Some sources consist of refiable annual
funds while others are periodic, such as grants. The use, availability and applicability of these
various sources are not afways at the discretion of the City. Spokane Valley will develop a track
record with funding agencies as time goes on, which will help make to make more reliable funding
assumptions.
A summary of expected federal, state and local funding sources for the City's six year Capital
Improvement Program is shown in Table 4.39. The following is a summary of transportation
funding options.
Federal Assistance
These funds are authorized under the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity
Act for the 21 " Century (SAFETEA-21) and ere edministered by the Federal Highway
Administration through Washington State Department of Transportation and the Metropolitan
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 48 of 58
City of Spokene Valley Comprehensive Plan
Planning Organization (Spokane Regional Transportation Council). Federal funding programs
include Bridge Replacement (BR), Congestion Managemerrt and Air Quality (CMAQ) and the
SurFace Transportation Program (STP).
State Assistance
The Washington State Transportation Improvement Board administers State transportation
programs, including the Urban Corridor Program (UCP), the Urban Arterial Program (UAP), and the
Sidewalk Program (SP).
C' Funds I
Spokane Valley contnbutes revenues from the General Fund and the Real Estate Excise Tax funds
for transportation proJects. The City also receives State Motor Fuel Tex end Restricted State Fue!
Tax.
200R-2A13
I 2.008
To A4rnac3f Ci~3:•Arost^ri To;al-A.r;;;:z:
:Scuuo {Y~ A::usur.t
v
J'_ ' ' ^I,t..iErYC': L~•~ - _ . -
3
6 ST€.~~,--veba~ G:;~
7 Z777-
STi 3-,2$2
1 ~ I .i~F~-:Y -Y'. ~-iT C.
F varpFaell '
J E+r-E}o&12'T'-Ave--Pi".~; - i
UAR
i
~ :~@F&£L-in~.~+_
Z 2
V-a« 1 C)e 4 f.
~ iC%- C cv vr r tiL
-ITA
G= rr=,`~a-la-k#~;~c~e G,r;.a~R h'•:-,_. _ 4 4~:
34 44;1:Iiva~'kv::~y--Sar.ds-tc
~-~+;CiS ~r . _ _~i1- ~lF•~tY: t
37 F? =~'~i~~;~2-31is'+-:.^•~9i~8~;nr:
;07 r.. ?
I - rt^i~~~~-ttlt^~ ~TVt-1~:7 -l-~:t•itii
Table 4.38 Six-Year Transportation Capital Facilities and Financinq Plan
2009-2014
dollars in thousands
2009
ItQm Pro ect r m To Prlmarv Cily Amount Total Annual
# Source m Ameunt
0 Broadway Avenue Safetv Pines Rd (SR-271 Park Road UAP 187 ~
Pro ect
~ Adopted Apri) 25, 2006 (Updeted 01-07-200pj Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 49 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
1 PinesJMansfieid TPP 206 1.796
2 Barlcer Road Bridae ~ EjF' 204 4,159
3 6golewtiv/Spraque/Dishman- Interstate 80 Diahman-Mica CMAQ 50 22
MiCa I7S
4 STEP Paveback 1 ~ i y 1.291 I 1.5 0
I ~
¢ Street Preservatlon Prolect - Citv 1.224 1,293
Various Streets
¢
13roacfwav Avenue 180 ft east oi Moare Fiora Road UAP 12 60
7 AoDlewav Blvd Unive ~ ve reen STP 121 937
8 WSDOT Urban Ramp Prolect- citv 300 ~
Broadwav,Araonne, Freva l/C
PineslSpravue Intefsection STA 1~2 742
PCC
10 44th Ave Pathvvav - Sand- S t0~ Sands ' Woodrufl STP E~ 44 ' 328
Woodruff
11 8roadwav Avenue Rehab 02 Fancher RQad Thiertnan Road STP(U) ~
12 ~erk Road #2 (PE oniv) BroadwaY Avenue ( Indiana STP(U) 48 352
L
16 Suraaue Avenue Resurfacing Unfversi Everqreen it 2.856 1856
- 17 Everqreen/SpraQ_
ue STA 233 1,133
intersection PCC "
18 McOpnaldl5praque STA 219 1,069
Intersection PCC -
Annual Total $7,228 18.439
- • -
I 2005
It~::, f. . = !'-~f G}~ -~-'al-#~s~it~-1
~r Sc:src? A=nuxat-f53 k~c4.;ns i
3
^!Y•
t • =r,•n~
ST€~-ausba" y
I 7
R~a}aci
~ ~°^~~i~;ti i ~J•^•:VRr:, :y I t'J=~.,.•'i+ti:, + .STC-- -i-:1::
~
42 FF;:
I 43 [ T'/, M 3 2
~Y, r: 44 4 4 L `t
'F!i•~7 ~.,~f:+4t JhPtr~
me nuC 12^
R..
~b y _F,V~`T^ Q ~r -
ST41W) 4Tr, 741
441 d ;~_-~"=?T: 8►nc-st:c~i lFtliBil" ~~P{ilj
_-Irt~. "7-
_y._ r Ll,.~~' cr r~~
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 50 of 58
. . - ,
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
I 2=
CkT ~L'•.•:: ~+r:,~ic::
ts~~ii ~`':i•~~r. -
r~•;:r.:a Asz;aiE••..t-{.~~ <<-._
i'~,_` ' ,,.°-.5•.
2010
I em Pro ect From To Prima Citv Amount Total Annual
~ Source w Amount
4 STEP Pavebadc cov 1.204 1.399
6 Street Preservation Proied ~ Cit L I:224 I 1.793
6 Broadwav Ave east of Flora Road ~ 342 1,708
Z Anotevv8v Extenston n( i Evemreen ~t r ~¢0 ~ ~$59 I
13 SullivanlSpraque Intersection STP(Ul ~ 861
.
PCC I
14 Mansfield Extension _ Pines (SR-27) Mir$beau Prkvw UAP 2Q.7_ 1.036
15 Flors Roaa I SwaQUe MisS1Qn UAP 62 447
~
19 Park Raad Bridgina the OthL 31 Z-50
- le Federal
20 Sprawe ResurfadRa #2 Everareen Stdlivan Citv 2,856 2.856
21 Suflivan Rd (PE Oniv) Eudid WM1elleslev STP(U) 80
L3 Indfana/sullivan Intersectian STA 275 1.34Z
~
24 BroadwavlSuliivan Intersectlon ~ STq Zr 1.230
- PCC
1
J¢ Amonne R48d Interstate 90 Trent CMA zi E7&
L7 Sulilvan Road West BridQe BR 0 7~.5
21 Broadway Avenue FI. ora 13arke r UCP 63 314
R9 Annlewav-Theirman E8 Lane CMA 3 28
Annual Total
4 $7,026 18.027
frr.;7'c~ f`::rr.aFy Ci;f-An:cmrli T-ota!-Arsuo.:;
~aur,:a (S) Arr;ou:;:
~
G
G:. '
4iFL~iF~2bP.•'1!~'::rr:-S~ft.;.r. !1 -.292
8 Applc~,y ~;;;;c;~_`.':~ r•Y~F~:cc.'. Ci'_;=«.;F 234 4N4
~~',c-~~-8:i~g+r,~-'.- ~r G•.:~c-€~d 2.gE
12
~3 F4n Avrnwz Ph;;-&-! Fliav~aa-St~E~t ~TA ~ • ~ OC~9
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200D Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 51 of 58
Ciry of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
I 2M
l:: oz To Prunarf
ur
19 S u tliuan:Spsa;auAac=;Ln 44_=
F~ ~
20 +-ci-}.:FRi t ~.~r~tr.~ r-s
~ Z iva A 4 44- 4sr't'11--5cr
2-3 1; raE G;; ~Yi
0 Z11-S
2,, 249
i ~3 ~-230
J
LJ~}>
annual-Tc;as s-397-4 20722
2011
tem Pro ect From To Prima Citv Amount Total Annual
# Source m Amount
4 STEP Paveback city 1.204 1,399
¢ SVeet PreservaUon Proiect C~ 1.224 1.283 +
7 Applewav Blvd Universf EMreen UCP 448 7,734
14 Mansfieid Extension Pines Rd (SR-27) Mirabeau Pkwv UAP 290 1,448
M sion UAP 298 1,487
15 Flora Road rS rp aaue
r _jj_ -
- ~ Paric RQad - Bridqinq the Othet Federal 90 2,150
Vallev
25 Argonne Road rlnterstate 90 Trent CMAQ 101 ~ 7f3
27 Suitivan Rd West Bridae BR 0 735
28 Broactwav Avenue Flora Barker UCP 50 250
22 Aaalewav-ThieRnan EB lane CMA9 ?2 f61
30 Mission Avenue I ra I UAP
}
16 ' Schater
31 Dishman-Mica Rehab STP(P) 202 1500
Bovvdish CiN L{mfffi ~
32 Saltese/Sullivan Sfanal Other 104 414
~ Pines CoRidor ITS S ra ue Trertt CMAO 280 2.081
35 Barker Road ~ BEoadwaY UAP 156 778
Annua) Total 4 568 22.638
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200pj Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 52 of 58
_ _ ~
City of Spokane Velley Comprehensive Pian
l~~~.-~ r._._~ ~'~i:. ,T•c; F'~~3~:=:? !,y-At;r_.;::~;
F ~-c•,[~ . . • ~
~ti-c+--f'-c~r:: c k..-i:Y ~ ; -•tini
Y 'c7tt'CCY-P~~~~t.~If1-ftb~C•ez vrrT Yt~t 44M
v
-~F~C-FF-~„•vF~~ rJ t'.v ~ i~ r ~ri
a 2 Va4"
48 F-;;,sa b~ru~ -Mis~srr U.4R 1.f'a8 a-33~
20 4F4 ~c4~e~a~ 1-2o ~-re~',1 ~AAAQ -g6 ~
L~' I V
-G.L Y
sZ -~larar.-Rd{ :~y ' ` .F•'' •
23 4 1,8~6i-8:: ;fe 24 a ~~•r-_~;°- GMAQ
r. "y T
27 G";9:
AnnualTa:a! s~F~-: szaa9s
2012
em Pro ect From To Prima Ctt ( J,Qtal Annual ~
0 Source Amoun Amount
6 S t Pteservation Pro}ect5 City 2261 Z392 ~
15 Flora Road S r~ aque Mission UAF' 268 ~ 13.3_7
~ Park Road - F3ridQirw the ~deral ~ 6,809
vai~ev
27 Sullivan Road West &idae ~ BR 0 4.056
28 Braadway Flara Barker UCP 565 2.826
1,701
30 issi n FI.~B rk r UAP 340
21 Sarker Road Applewa tnadwav 1AP 289 1.445
16 Park Road -#2 (CN onlv) Bros~dwav Indiana STP(U~ 270 2,000
37 3 Avettue v n Best STP(Ul ~ 153
98 Evet reet►13 3 STRIJI iu 526
Everareen SR-27
~ Bar4cet Road 8 A~ ? ~
Annual Total $4,482 $23,616
rf•-:cr~. i:'4ma~; G~iy
Set~~ t~anot~c~:tY) r.~c:, :t
r•
7 ~D
2y - ~~1+~-R~-1N:3brFtkic~ iiR -4056
n ni ~ ~4'
vJ I~-i)i i-m-~ , -i.'.^-covtiraif ~ r•sr;st~a ~~-+ftvj -r.v
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 53 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
I 2r-142
l;A; I FFon, To kf:M-ary Ci.y Tci.i ~-Aa+:i4a!
L•-iuTCG lsun't~`~
I .-_1.,._ . ' l-f.T_t-Vt-1'-:t,:•".`.. ~ _ '
V T ~'G •~'1~~~TL'C 'EA%;~t''1 4V4
• r C
-Lw~; F .~8
-~,T-F-{~
!
-;-E-fthF
-34 -EvtrIqrec-n=t-2'4 S7f'-4U1
Annua!-Tota! ~~,s50 5
I 2013
Item Pro ect From To Prima Cltv Amount Total Annual
# Source m moun
5 SVeet Preservation Proied Cl~t 2.264 2.391
Park Raad - eridqina the Othe- 29 6.809
Vallev Federal
22 Sullivan Road Extension Biqelow Gu1ch 151tv 55 55 I
27 Sutitvan Road West Bridoe BR 0 ~ 4.056
30 Mission Avenue lo Bsrke~ UAP ~Q 1 1
36 Batker Road Appl~ BroadYraY UAP 188 942
36 Paric ROad -#2 (CN only) r adrrra Indtana STP(U) 314 2.326 I
37 32 Av~nue Everqreen ~ STP 24 ~ 175
' 1fy, 3
3§ Eve~4ree~►J32ne Everareen SR.27 ~ 3'681
12 ¢arker Road 8' Ap!lmv SP LO I 404
~
AO Sulliven Road (RW/CN onlvl Eu i We~~ STP(U1 160 860
42 Pines CQrridor ITS Spra4ua 16 CMAQ 106 785
43 Suilivan Road Rehab Indiana EuGide STP(P) 22 1,5,
45 3 Avenue Rehab Dishman-Mice SR-27 STP(Pl 29 212
Annual Total 4 689 24 348
2 f 1-1 -%`9
(it?Ir'r ~~~ti•J=~-'i I'Fs7F'i TG P-'7Frt2C'f Cli~-A~:Gl{Sii TOta~mwil'
30tfuo
7 c~.~C':`t-f°+t`~G'~~cttt»t-~'{t- G•:.T ~ ~ 4t -i-F4rcl
23 -S_'~=k~A-~-~",`?c!-n';-~-_
~ a
FT-,~"~' _a T
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 54 of 58
Cfty af Spckane 1lasley Carnprehensive Plan
n~~`3
~'r~r.~€~ ~:c. :,~l--A
APe.c- l+`+ z
r. r, . a !
- ~ .
~ , . . _ . ,
s.'..'d
L i -Rcs! c7T.' h"i , YT' 4 44
3-3 -625
~
4d~~t~=
C;~J v i.:F' 'L2
34
3c SG='
y
~ 44G
-~Li ~~k3G1:~-c-T;•;~k~~•i f ~ ~7' ~ _
1
b ~*l ~ ~i. &~.T4~{~aF ~
_~~~~~r •sn~i ; b~ ~r~~ :~~!.-l GMAQ 4-96
r-
~ $ 4V3d
- - 2014
i it~sra Rra ect rs~rn T~ Pr3ma Citv A;naunt Tota1 Annual
W Source US Amount
b $tre~# ~reservsti.MPro~+~ct C-i ty 2,260 2.391
37 .3 Avenu^e grr~rare~n ~B5t r STMI) 65 ~733
_
39 Barker Rcaad S Aq la 9-C-P 49--P- _2,449 i
4~ Su11Evan RnEid RV+IICN onl Luefld Wellslm ' ~TP Lf 6~5 2.725
43 Pull,lvan Road R_ haE~ ! Imdiat~a Eudi; S"_ (P] '1~ ~
t
45 3 AvenueR~$b i~isl~man-~li~a SR-27 S, TPfP JL2 1,198
LG Carnabin TruckLie ~ ~ it Llrn:4s STP4U1 234
A7 a~plg+~v ~ctenslon Evemreen T~hlrlev S'`f~ 834
M WiversC oad inIa - 2 15 ~P(P 441
48 LJrtlvessity Rmt ~i Dishmen-WiCa ~5 5TP ZQ)
$2 Park Ro .#3 S r~gue r dwray STP[U1 12 141
Trent ~1 3~F~
~69 Barkec Road S~rkane River
_ ~ - Flt~ra u~~ ~uC~i~J
6~4 ~udid #~~dFlc~ra Road 51 ~
Euclid Ftora f~a~
Annual Taja~ 4.0 ~ $12,8-32
Tah1'e4 99 Six Year Transporkation ImQrovement Program Summar~ 2009 Throuslh 2014 din 59.0001
Secured Pro si.s lanned rer e ts Tf37A'LS
Fede~ Si~~e C~r~r ~ T~ ~k!qral Me C~Hh~r 2!1 Tata1 Ferlerat 5'te Mer G~'~t T~!
~Admpted ApHl 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-20091 Chapter 4 - Capital FaciIities
Page 55 of 68
City of Spokane Vailey Comprehensive Plan
2009 5,531 1.522 1063 42-M 14.346 409 4 443 3.277 4.093 5.944 1.526 3,466 7507 18.439
2010 1IL9 ~ Z044 9004 LM IM i 7 ~ ~Q21 IM 2M LM 18,027
2011 2413 Q Q 3 073 4~6 5,843 LI6 414 iM 17.152 2~ 9.136 414 1M 2Z,638
2QJ2 Q Q Q 3~ ~ $,644. 8.955 404 2.221 21.224 ~ 8~ 404 4.613 23.616
LALTO~ Q Q Q 4 41Q ~ Z1.957 14.osa A,1,~Q 410 4~Q 24,348
0 0 Q ~ ~91 628 1.4b9 9 97 1,747 10.441 6.728 1.4b9 497 4,13A 12832
9,703 2$$8 S Q7 18,312 361 0.6884 26~3 775 147 8 587 29 331 1 119 900
bla~43Ttar.spt~a~la~Ca~#t~1Saro}er.ts-#~r~#iug-~'~!s-a0a~-~0~?
~.-;~.a ~ C4bFr I Ci:} T4W
r ( :~7 I ~ ,+4A $-3-~-;'~
~g~g
~4,568 I 63,074 I 6110.722
2044 I Y+,vG`, I ~Wi I Vv40 I SCfjCmu I 6 2"+,96'+
= I $6,624I &<160 I VV I v' ivivv I 60I3~ •
2043 I ~j~V I $2444 I YLi I ~J:JLJ I ~
I i~}'~ ~H~ I t~~~ti~ I t~~ I ~'~'L^.TT'V I
Table 4.40 Six ear Transportation Improvement Program 2009 ThrouAh 2014 in 1 OOOI
Pro ects Without Local Match Within Exlstin Resources
Pro ect Name Project Descrlption Total Cost
8th Avenue Phase 1- Camahan_o
Havana Reconstruct 8th Avenue o three lane secti n wi h urb, 2 615
* , * * * ."utter sidewalks and blke laneys.~ * *
8th Avenue Phase 2- Park to Didcev Recon$truct 8th Avenue to a three lane section with curb. $3,156
* • a utter. sidewalks and bike lanes
. * ,
8th Ave;ue Phase 3- ,Didcey-to
Comahan Reconstruct 8th Avenue to a three land section with curb, .811
* * * * * autter. sidevralks and bike lanes * *
Barker Road Reconstruction - 32nd ta
8th Spokane Count Py raject: rec.flnstrugt, Barker to 3 lan~ $40
sedion: Citypartner match
Bawdish Road Rehab - 32nd to 8th 593
Recanstruct and widen rQadwav to three lanes t i l L 1 ~ 7 i
Bowdish Road Rehab - Diphmana►Aica to $270
32nd 2 inch Qrind and inlav existing road
, .
SR-27/Pines/16th Intersedion 3 132
* m * * * Improvements to intersection (dual lane roundabout?) Universitv/Smaue Interse~ion PCC Realaoe asphalt oavement with nortland cement concrete 997
pavement
. .
TOTAL: $18,614
~
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2000 Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 56 of 58
~
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Potentlal Annexation AreaaJUrban Services
The Growth ManaQement Act reQUires that counties desiqnate urban growth ereas (UGAs). The Ci of
Spokane Valley identfied Iands adjacent to the Citv w•rthin existina UGAs that would likely be developed
for urban uses and potentially be annexed to the CIn order to assess the need for caaital facilities, the
Citv has identified existin4 service oroviders within the Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs). This
assessment should help identifv the effiects a Qotential annexation area will have on existinq levels of
service.
7able 4.41 ExlstlnQ Urban Servlce Provlders withln Potenttal Annexation Areas lPAAs
~ hwoo Northeas Eas + Southeast South Ponderosa ~ Edqeclif( I
Domesdc Wa er Pasedma ~ Son,sc~i'~dalad 7'!pn~~ ~ ym ~ Vo S.C. W.D. No. 3~ Eest Sooksne
Hutton 601e",e'~ ~ i Cm*dW ~ s.. W.D. No_ I I ~
Fire & ETtyencY Services I F.D. No.1 b_I ~.F D. Na 1 ~ F.D. tJg I ~ F.O. No.1 d$ F.D. No. t b 8 ~ F.Q. Na 8 I.D. 8
Lsw Enforcement ~bbolcane Cauntv Sookane Sookene Cauntv I SQOkane Countv Saokane CQwtv I Sodcam CnunN Sookane Countv
C.
Li &C. Li 0~ &C. L~xan D+st S.C. lJ6rarv Oisi S.C. Ubrarv D~st. S.C. V'brarv Disi. S.~i~ran Dist Disl
I I I
Pak.s 6 Ow Space Snoicana Counh ~S-DOkane Cwgq ~ S2gLma CoM ~ Sookene CounN Sookwe Camty ~ S~oknr~ Caunly ~gokene Coun~
Pubtk Sclwols ~)U, S.D. A S.D. 81 I EV• S.D I C.V. SD• ~ C.V. S.D. C.V. 6.0. ~ C.V. SD. I W.V. S.D. b S.D. 81
Public Tran$k ~ otlave~a~,Q INx eva~a~ Iot 1 ~ Not ev Ibl ~ Na evabbte I Nol avaHaWe ~ Notv II~
SaNtary Sewer I Spokene Camh I §pokwe Comty Soolcsne C.wtv Smkane County ~ &okane r.,amtv I Not SewwW I Sookane Caintv
Namt wsbe r~mk waste - ~ waste Mamt ~ wast i-qrnl, Fwaste t mt
" solid ~cvcle f-Wasie tulqmt I r
;to ~ Sookene Countv ~ Soolcere Ca_mt~ ~ gokane Camty ~ Spokane Caur►tx ISpaane Countv ~ Sookane Counh ~ Sbdwe Cauntv
Street Cleaninq ~ Sookane Cou~N ~ Sookene Gauntv ~§ookane Ccuntv ~ Sooicone CatmN I §pq_kane Gw~t Saoiwe CounN ~,cne Countv
Transportation ~ Sc+okane County I Srokane Countv ~ Spokene Counhr ISpokene County I Sookane Countv Spokane Countv ~ Spokane Cquntv
The Cikv of Spokane Valley hes adooted Levels of ServicejLOS) to measure a public facilitv or service's
gperational characteristics to QauQe its aerformance. The follovying analYSjs will assess current levels of
service in the PAAs to arovide a context of how annexation could affect the City's LOS and provide
guidance for phasing of annexations. Additional the analYsis will provide Citv staff and elected officials
information to assist in theplanninaand bud etin of public service deliverv as a result of annexation to
the Cit oy f SDOkane Valley.,
The followin~ studV includes LOS enalvsis for sanitarv sewer and parks and open space. Analvsis is not
provided for services where the Cifil has adopted the minimum reqional LOS• Services excluded from
this enalvsis are domestic water, fire orotection, law enforcement, libraries, public schools,Qublic trans t
sanitarv sewer, solid wastelrecvcle. storm water, street cleaning end transportation.
If a level of service is measured on a oer capita basis, the population assumations are based on Table
2.1(Land Ca acitv Anaf sis in the Land Use chapter and Snokene Countv's estimated current population
in the Met%politan Urban Growth Areas (UGAs). The Citv of Spokane Vallev's land caaacity analvsis is
based on the adooed reqional methodoloqy-
Sanitarv Sewer
The CitY of Spokane Valley does not arovide sanitar~r sewer service at this time. S okane CauntY
provides wastewaxer collection and transport systems within the C'rtv of Spokane Valley. Incomorated
areas must have wastewater collection and transQort systems in accordance with the adopted sewer
concurrencY requirements. The table bslow provides a sewer assessment withiUhe PAAs. Level of
service is cate orized es sewered, within the 6-year sewer Qlan, or notplanned for sewer.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 57 of 58
City of Spokane Valiey Comprehensive Plan
( Table 4.42 Sewer assessmQM withln Poientlal Annexatlon Areas (PAAs) In Acres
ItN AAs Total Sewerd in 6-year Sewer not Percentaqe
CIP avallable Sewered
NENNNNNNNW~
orth~rrood ~ 1.397 p 4~3 77%
orI 46~ 0~ 43~ i
East I ag I 1! I 2p7 I 09 ~ 17%
S~~ I 791 I 443 I 0 ~ 347 I 55%
South ~ .1,.1 I 669 64%
Ponderosa ~ 47 ~ 0 ~ 12 ~ 35 ~ 0%
Edgecii 98 Li,- 0 I - - - I- - - 7 %
~
Currentlv, Spokane County owns a caaacitv ailocation of 10 million gallons oer da m d in the Spokane
Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant (SAWTP). Bv theyear 2020, the County's flow is aroiected to
reach 21 mad. In 1999. Spokane Countv beqan a Wastewater Facilities Plan process to evaluate lonv-
term reaionel wastewater needs. and to detennine alEematives to meet those needs. The result was a
decision by the Board of Countv Commissioners to build a new Spokane Courity ReQionai Water
Reclamation Facility (SCRWRF). Spokane Countv is proposinv to construct a new reqional wastewater
treatment plant at the Stockvards site in the Citv of Spokane. The new treatment olant and associated
facilities will arovide additionat capacitv for increased wastewater flows Qenerated by the Countv's Septic
Elimination Proaram and for aroiected arowth in the Countv's seroice area. Manv of the PAAs have
sewer services. however new development will continue to add demand for new sewer services. The Citv
should evaluate existinp sEwer treatment capacitv and infrastructure prior to annexation.
Parks and OQen Space
The Citv of Saokane Valley has an adopted level of service of 1.92 acres of parkland aer 1,000 residents.
In 2007, Spokane Countv commissioned a fiscal studv of the Urban Growth Areas (UGAs). The reqort
focuses on the services orovided bv Spokane Countv to the metrouolitan UGAs and the revenue
aRnerated for Sookane Countv in these areas. The report established a base population in the
metroaolitan UGAs usina 2000 Census data and buildinQ permits. The estimated population for the
UGAs adiacent to the Citv of Spokane Vallev was detennined to be 7.294. The City of Spokane Vallev
2007 Land Quantitv Analvsis (LQA) estimated the land caQacitv in the PAAs could aotentiallv add 13.406
additional residents. Usina the poaulation estimate from Spokane Countv's fiscal studv and the Citv of
Spokane Vallev's estimated land capacitv there is the potential of 20,700 residents at build out in the
PAAs. Currentlv there are no arks in the PAAs. If the Citv annexed all the PAAs 40 acres of oarkland
would be needed to meet the current level of service of 1.92 acres.
Accordin4 to the Citv's Park Master Plan, manv residents in the Citv of Saokane Valley are not
conveniently located near aUrk. The City's Park Master Plan states that varks should be one of the
hiQhest priorities for the City. The plan also states that meetinq Park nesds can be a challenQe in
nei4hborhoods where little vacant land exists. Manv residents expressed a desire for saorts fields
fcomplexesl these fecilities qeneral rectuire large vacant aroperties. The CitY should consider
purchasinQ Qarkland arior to annexation to ensure adeQUate facilities will be available to serve
neiqhbofioods in Potential Annexation Areas (PAAsl
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 58 of 68
0 ~ ~ ~~,~u ~u f r~r~_~± ~ Frnne' Fcu+cu
~ ~r` _ - c ti~'~ ~ ~..r"` ta'~y . . ,r a . - ~ . v ~C~llRS r)' : ' r 'I II \
~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ •
~i . r~ ~ , ian . e ~ e e an _ i I _ _ ` j , 3. : _ trian
- - ~JZT ~ ~1. -f r a ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ,ti±~ .~1: ~
~7~r.: ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ A~ ~ a~ ~ . ~ . em _ s 2 > - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r~ r , 1,~~ - ~ ~
, ~ ~ ~r ~ ~ - ► r n~ y +'f n' ; ~ i'~- ~ J_ ~ Fei ,~r ~i Pl~nte s n ~t ~ ~ n .j_ . ~uw' ~ ; _ r~,~~.fi - ~ „ a ~ ~ ~
f- , 54cllt~i;y ~ o ; r 1a ~ ~ J5
. I~ : _ ~ _ ; _ - ~ ~ rl~ ~ ] R~d _ C~ of - - - ~ ~ - Le end , - g `J ~ ~r .'~r---~v~ n " G- - ~I~ rt e~ o~nt? ~ twrt ~
- - / 1. > . R S okane ~ w~~s~~-~ ~ p / _T.~, ~ ~ a ^ ' ~ <1- 4+ulfcfl"1'f~fl~~~l~' ; ~ In ~utA ~ ( ~ „ r ~=i ~ ,_~Gu~~.u . _ - - ■ ■ ■ • ~ ■ ~ • Q Cf n n e ~
~ s~ , < Bicyck Route Cl~ssiQcadons Sh(slJs 1 rrk { ~ - e,d a~ ~ u nr~ , I s -
r rd A c ~ ~~linnctinhM Rocks} 0 cha ~ - _ ` - W ' ~ _ - -~y ~ FBfk 19 ' '1' ` ~cdl 'k " ~BfCd USC pfl~l u u~ p~i~ ~
1~ , Ej'iQ.'~ _ ti r- Dolmn a r ~ ~ I ! - ;
rc&iitE i~l Ihit E b - p ►5~18~ USC P8~1 Prateridc s rk8nc Ri►u ~ , TO~~~n-af Mil ~~d airneH ' ~ ~
r Ir! 1!,. 1_I ~ ~1fir~bcau g ~ F ~ ~~f , •I~~vc ~ v' ` -l~'~'~ ~ Puk s ExiSdng Bikt LSnC ~ ~ r,,,, , - ~ ~
~ T. ~ ~ S,~t 3 (ui t~,,, ~C ~i~k 1, J , ~ . • o n a p~~ Bike Lane
• - <<- ~ ~ - tiU1~1Y80 ~ nm6u~1~ E a K ~ _ .r °plpMfet~ ~ ~ ~ i t - r~ PArk ~
. o ..h.4_ _ •r. < 3 ~ ~ o. w~'=w ~ k~ ~ Signed Shared Roadway
p~ ~`~t~~t~ ~~1551on n ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ - P, A I'~ ~i~~ f~r~ P~t I I C l' O f ~ r Shared Roedw
v- - ~..~i ~ ].S" ~ q ^ \ ~ ~ IAW 't - 1'ei c, Sen o ,Center r~~ , ~ _ L~berty
~I r --i ~ u. s ~ _ - ~ ~ Pedestrian Path a - 9 ► Lake ~I _ , W~
~ - ~ Pwrk RoA cww„ ~ _ > _ ~ F- Pro sed Pedestrian Path a
• `P~I ~ ■ . ~ c,uw~ P~ q, , } , ~ • Aki i
A9t k ~ ~i • Iki ~ A~i (lli ~ r -6- - ~ T~IC8d5 a - ~ ~
ia L U o J~e N ► Halfour pp rtunitr Toti~•nshtp ~ ~ - ~ ln ~`~i''~i~n~tF't ' M~ n ~ L v - in' ~1 ' m ~ ln n i
) . t t t. l~. ,-1' a'+- - I ~ YI'~ - 1 ~ ~ r , y~q,y, 1 - schools
IN~~ ~ 11~'.• - ~ f.~' , ~ ~ ~ t' tl N t~ t' . t t C L 1! 21 ' ~ 7~ l: :'T"Y: C s R U N G G' . ~ ~ ',y~ L '1 f ~ _ : r~ ~ :.~-t I~a x a~, ~+~-r+ Railr~d •r t~,,~:~.,~y. . i ~ d~h liellel'~ ~ ~ 1 x
~ . ~ c r btb ~ c " 1 e,~, ~ ~ l~il~e -61h , ~ ~p~ ~ ( 2IIt 1, , , i` p~p, ; I, ~ ~ f~ Other Muntc~ 1qtS
rt ~ , Nil~ 1 f~ r" rl .:-c -t~ C ~iaf0 ~ J~~ - - T'` -t: .i_ - _ ~ ~ ,.r
~ -M~ L~ i1, ~ . , - I ~ ~ ~~_hr,,, 4~'dhe~i~tr-~ - , ~ , ~i of S kane Vall - ~ ~ r ~ ~ , p ~ ry ~ ~r -.,r . , e ~ , ~ -
~~.~,r------ i';. - w.~ ■ ~ ~ . . - - ~iDi~htn:~n EIills: ,r,~~ R l ~ ~ ; j-- ~ - y f4h U~Bfl ~ifOWL~I l~ICB i. F+ 1~ c: J`-?'~. Idl~ ~ _ ~ lili ~ r_ ' ! ' ' ~ _ ~ p II ~ t+
.1 f ~ , _ 3 ~ F ~ ~ ~ ~ V - . Parks
~ ~ - , • , ~ / ~bd e I:;h ~ ~ 161h ' ~~'^1 ~ 4~ ~ r~~' ? T'r 1'ie~~ P~rk ~ Y~ ~ I ' a , t C~ ~,~Fi:J t
~ 1.. ~ c -f . W21G B(~1CS tl ~ ~ I , ~ ~ i p o b~` f~--; ~ ~ ~ a f % -~M,,~
~ - ~ i ~f . ,;~r'~ ! . '~-'~u ~ - ~ . ~ - ~ ~~~~.~~f z,,~ ~ - - zt _ ,
, ~ . ~ ~ , ~ , _ ,
23~h P,rk ; I_ e, ; G; _ • ~Blh • ~ ' ~ ~ ~y i:
3 z~n, BroK•ns i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Map Loca~o r~m ~ P~rk 3 _ L~:,~~ . ~ ~~d i , - J~ Map Location
~ C~stl r ~ . : ~ r~ c~ J?nd ' I ~ ~ ~ ~ 69
Z Pn k ~ b r. ~ ~ r ,~j d ~ ~ ,
, ~n ~1I.Y yr~" ► ~ ~ _ ~ 71~h } ~ : - C - j°---= d~
'~+~_+t \ 1 r` i r ~ E , r T~ f n~ce: itn2noos ~ d
y, lu ~ ' ~I.,._ ~ ~ ~ , _~1 - ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ °°d ; ` ~ ' Bai ~ P
= ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ` ~ > ~ a~n ~ ~1 -.s • ~ - ~ ~ •
` i i ~c ' s . I 1 ` dr~lh -
C ` % . C i~' ~ , tr~~;~ ,
~rl~ ~ M ~ - _ r~. ~ s r..I i~ . ~ o o.s i 2 M Z Miles
~ ~ > ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ° , ~ M
G , ~ ~ ~ r Illtr C nsert~~ti n }`~L~r AO~Ml: T~1! Illfamdwn sko,~ n on tlus myp r.► carqHled fro ` ~ a4J~ •t~~.~,~'• , ~ revulon TI~e Cl n+oke.t S11h y, a;~ SOIIICES QiK~ ~.f S11b~ECl ftl C01451~11 ! ry p fs co»ytrled fi•an titrious 7'he Ciry wakea no clatns
d ~ or a~dees ~bou!!he acw or t~crr ~ o th~s a _ ~l ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ . fo~ ru► Conssrv~Non 8~' w-y oJthts mcrp and
k ; ezpnssly discl~tms 1 iabiGt~~ Jor crrors and omisslau in Us ~ i,, . _ ~ ~ . ~ To cbnfum occuracy cantacr ~he Crty of Spokcme VaTlry, Cc amisslau in its onnlenls. okcaw Vcrllry, Comnunity
x ~ o y ~ Drrelopment Deprpfirenl, Divfsion ojPlarvdqg, (SU9J 921 ~ vrti;g (509) 921•1000.
~ Nulke y Prodnd of t1t Clq oi5poktnc Vdky, Comnrnltp Derdopme~t Dq ~ tv Derdopmet DcpsrtAeW
~ ~
1 ~ ~ " i
~y - _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - ~ - - - - ~ - - ' - - -Irrigatioa - ' ~ ~ Pioaeer ~ - ' ~ ' I , `Ir . ~ . _ a .
~ , aamm~ ~ s Distrlct q3 t , ~ ; 1~~kr ~ ~ ~ - ar ~ ~ ' I ( nm an~ 2(~3 ~ a~L ~Sadrna P k ~ , p . ~S . . ,
u ~ ~ , l .~a ation ~ ~ , , , ~~~K er is r~c s a ~ . ~ ~ , I ~ ~
~ ' Uist~lc ~17 ~ ; 3~ ~ a(, r - 31 3, 35 ' 3rr - _ ~ =I 3? ~ + a { ~ , ~ ~ , ~ c~~~r_
~ ~ o~F ~ ' '~o ~ S e ea ~ i . G , _ ~ ~ ( _ F ~s , ~ ~ CoasotidAtcd
~ • ~ TreatR~ood ~ ~ i > ~ ~ lrri adon ~ ~ ~ _ , ~ •,a~ i r ~ HUItQA ! I . ~ ~ A € i 1 , g ~ °
{ lmgation , ~ ~ ~ ~1 •----••-._a..----------•--._ ~ ~--Distnct k19. VE ~ • 2 - fiimbcrlinc - -•t►~,~ - -S~tilemeal- - - -Distri~C~3-_ _ I I ! ~ ~ e ~ i ~rv p ~ nbll
r, ~ ~ ~AO C~t1N',-y U ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 7 _ ( ~ ~ ^ ~ ~ .A ) • ' f~0[llt ~ Y~{~
i ~ • I ~ ~ ~ ' 9 ' S ok~nc.~ i
~ ~ - p I - i ~ ~ ~ ~ fi - - •f; lk~ 3 ~ ik ~ (u . 0- ~ Inc~usirial ~
~ ~ ~ e ~ Le end ~ , ~ w Fark g ~D ~
t ~ ~ ~ C 6 ~ ~ 1 tiw~ ~ na~ K Munici watcr Purv ors
~ ~Urchard~A~enue ~ ~ - ; ~ ~ i i ~ hais~r _ _ _ -tnderidc- S Irri aUon r~ ~ _ - r- - ` ~ ~ ~ ' .
p r = ~ _ - w •~~w~ - Trcnt~ oo ~ ~ [~tsii ~ c~t'~U ~ ~ 3;u ~ r ~ ~1 , City of Spokane aaur Scrv~ce I q - I ~ ~I.~~ ~
. ~ ~ - In~n n'~kr I)istrirl ~6 ~ ~ ~~r~ Cti ~ of S kanc ( - Y~ rr ; K I , 4 P q ~ C t t y o f S p o k e n e V a l l ry
- ~ ~ n' a t e r S e n~ i c e ~r k~ u 5 ~ti ~ e ~ g li! ~ l~l 12 ,
trK i E , M' e A Well Hcads IIolida~ , = K„o~ ,1-~ ~ GrouP • . e _ ~ ~ ~ tiiu~ ~ia • Itt„o ~Yn~~ y ~ Traller ~ I ~ ~ g , _ ,
n~cro ~ ~ Cnns~lidale _ ~ Court ~ 9 - ~m~ Q~ , ~ Group B Wcll Heads S p o k C' o u n n~ I l i t a~ i i r n g a t i o n ns I date d ti h`
, / . n ~ ~ ~ - - , ti'a ler ll t s tr ic t I lome Por k I h~ trie t, t+ l 9_ ~ ~y i - - ~ _~,~.,l ~ . Irrigation , ~ ~ i Utbetl Growth ArtB
•~1'S f01 # s~'u L'`1~no I- _ _ - i ~ , ~ n ~ A ~ •;I- - , , . ~ _ ~ ~ nt~t►~~t I , ~ , ~ ~ I ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ a ~ S ~ ~ Y
, - , ~ a w~~r Boa;~ ~ 4 a , -9 - ~ - uflaa ` ~ C a a- ~ ;l~ a - i
C ~ W ~ C~iIAO ' ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f; i ; 8io v' i~;~ Br~ ~ ' wi ' ~ ~ '~'i ~ ~C'` Alki ~0'r~ - _ ~r~~ ti}
~ • ~i ' ~ ci ~ ~ _ ~ 1 Alki , ~ k ~ ~ I ~
Curnhu c G ( Ilutchinson ik v ir ~ w" ~,l• v,i ` 1 Im atton ~ ~r~~,~ a y~"'y' jt~, 3 I ,
rngsuon ~ ~ 1 , ~ 'n -~r~ Ba ~ - ~ bistrtc1 ~l6 3 ta ern F.leclrlc " „ ~ ~ pistrict h i ~ ~ , r'
e ~ ~ ' ~,c , I s~ i„ K ~l'~tcr ( ompan~~ tn ~ i, ; ~ , T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ t' ~ I ~ ~ a z ,
, _I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~S 3 ~ ~ , ~ she!! ~ ► .i ~ _ ' " ~ y + ~ ~ L~~
~ - ~ i b~h a ~ f~ fnh ^ i, ~ i ~ ~ ~ 1~ 1 i _7 ~ i ~ l ~ ~ Sdi ..l ~
7~f r 1 y ~ Y' ; , - 1 9d~ ~ - ~ I t ~a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ II i y i lld►
~ ~ IA ~ ~ ~ , 'ti ~ i I > I R 11 ~ w ~ i ~ 1 i "e )SL i i a'~~ .
IaU+ a/' 14th ~ ~ ~ , t o ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~Ih 1 ~ i f:~~yl S~olc nc i ~ ~ = E Cnnsalid~ttd t ~ ~ 3 q 6 I j. _ ~
~ , _ } _ . 1 1 ~ ~ 4 f ~1 ~ ~ 11'ntcr r Irrf wUon ~ ~I ; ' Uistricl ~l ~ ~ ta ~ = 5' ~r ~ ' f)istrlct ~19 ~
i - ~ R . , '~"~~t+, i„_ ~ ~ ' ~ 9 fi ~ ! + ~ . ~-y°~ ~ ' ~ i g ~ ~ 1 si ; , I,
i s ~ r 1 ~ R~ R^ ~ I i ~ C~ ' 0( ~ ~ ~ ~ i - 'IJ~ ' ~ ~ ' 2 yr~ ~ ► ~ i
n ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ - ' „ 30 i 2'1 ~ ~ n ~ Z§ „ ~ d ZQ .~a'~ i ~ •i~ c ~ ' I Spok~ e ' ~ a ~ t ~
t r nic~ ~ ~ S nl,anr E'~unn~ ~ ~~y_ 1~ e St ~ i ~ ~ ' g ' ~ - ~ g ,r,~t l~ster Di trict i ~ '
; - ~N3 S~shm N2-~. ` ~ ; Map Location 1hh ~ ~ ~ t i 1 3 '~T 'nd - - - I.ocation
- - F - - - - - - - - I- - ~ p Irri ation AisMct ~15 ~ ~ ~w ~ ~ g 1 ~ ~ ~ ,!:;g
3tn odcl ~ ~ ~ di ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ 5- ~ ~ ~ ( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ lrrl~at on I , ~ ,
, I ~ a~~ 5~ Ui ri r~l ~ ' ' ~ ~ i ~ sl c , i ~ ~ ~ , i r'~ • ~ I ~ 3' ~
' ~'3S ' 36 ' 31 ' ~ 3~ 3~ I , , DAte:12/23n008 ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~
~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~A ~ „ ~ ~ _ , P
' A f ~ ~ u~ ~ ; ~ ~i , , a ~ ~u ~ I i . i ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ f i ~ ' ~ ~ ~ . .
~ ~ ~ ~ _ - - - Nth i . _ ' .r.4!lb.~ - - - • - - , ~ - - - , - - - - ~ ; ~ .
s ' ~ ~ ; I i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ 0 Q.5 1 1 Miles ~ ` - ti ~ ` ~ ; ~ I ( ~ T ~ ~ ~ ~ I t ~ ~ L i ~ i 1 Z MflGS I i
~ ~ - ~ ~ pt s ~ 17 1 ~ ~ NuRCe. 1he J- rormal~a~ slwicn on tlus is co fed o~ vcri~ %plled fiom v+Qious
/ - , ~ r ( a! , _ Iy , ~ ~ ~ I i U ( ~ so~aces and !s subject 1o const~ revuroa Thr Ciry nwkrs no t~ut 5 okaae Couori ~ iry nackes no clalms
~ ~ v` ~ p' ~ ' 2 5 E a rma►~ees about Ihe accur ar c~art o ~kts and , ~ 8~ ~3' ~ ^~A 2~~ er DisMct ~ I ~ . a ~ ~ ~ ~G ~ or e~as and onusslons in IU oonleN rhis nxrp and 'ons fn !!s aonlents.
~ em ~2 ~ ~ 'aunt ~ ~ expresslyd~sclatmrlrab ryJ E ~ ` 3,Syat .,Spokaac f., } i I To con ~m accura conlac! the Ci ~ o S k~re Vad! , Conumua i ~ ry nI~ ~ ~4ater,lllstrict ~ Vdley, Canrmurury
, ~ i p-~,-. • ~~r i ~ • De►selopmem Depa►tmem, Dlvf,tlon oJPlasrf►~g, (S09J 911-l000. a I #31S~st~m ~2 r - F/ ~ ~ _ a G' ' ~ c a( ~ producl ef Ihe Clry of SpaM~ne Vilky, Ccma~irolq [Mdapmwt Dep~rlmta (509) 921-1000. lopsnwt Departtnest
~ ~ - - ` ~ ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' - - - "
:
~ - - leco 1 1 ,
~°Iamm~ 1 ~ _ f a .
~ ~ ~ , ~ `~__2 .
- - ' 1 1 ~ . OlJ rea r ec , a ~ ~ eation
~od~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ - . i ~ 1'I~ote't ~ ' ` . ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ r ~
i I ~ F~'r~' ° ~ - - - a " ~ - won~,ky • ~ ~
, Le end , ~ - ~ ~ _ g -t - - • - x~ ~ C~ty of , ; ~ ~ - -
~ ~ s I 1N IcPo ut . ~ ► - ~ Community Parlc Spokane , ~ , - ~ s
. ~ - , Sbldds P~r4 _ Coaaerv~tioe ~ ~ ~ ti1~::~,~ ~ ~i ~ = -h r ~ Canservaition Lend
(;ltjaaeh~69 N - a R ckc ti • ' ' ~
° ~ ~ : ° ,R Re 'oaal Aerk ' - d r.~ ~ 8~ , Urchar~-r y'-`,`• " l
_ :1Yt PAI' ~ nbltsi b Eudid * . ~:r ~~~~E i 5 ial Use Facilitia Spa6a»e Riti~er ~ - 1~~~~' ~ - ~ P~
i ~ r; m,• 0 0 00 ~ ~ ~ ,._P_ "e ~ ..1. ~ n:e- ~ ,~1 V I t~ ~~k~ `'nBul~C~'L ~ t • ~'~C'C p~~t of Natural Resources
HUtiktyC _ ~ 1~IY1lN I 4~ ~
i t ~ s ~ l ~ ~ 7! c e ~ ~ ~ , ~ u.i ~ P' City+ Of $p0~t vA~~C~+ a14s!~ E_ uC ~ ~~811 11kid h~il'H~t~ll ~ . I~11'l~ ) • , Muntga ry ,
n ro ~ Kmt ~ ~ ~ 7-~ - Missfori~++~'~I1 Park Park f U Othei MUniCIFS11tiCS E' ~ rY uw
- ~a w ~ - Parl~ Sentor ~ ~ i ~1-~ F on ~ ~ ,ri-. - - ~
h ~ uv x enter , - •I~~ - ~ I 1]~(1C?fOW~1/~►fCS I ~~F~~~ Grr~ien~cres CI~' Of i- , I - t~~V,on .L-t.~:-~. i~~`,'_ aro ~ Po~k ro o tis u r~:IbeC
- int ~ - ~ i ~ 1►~~ ty Wata Hodics f~ ~ ~~Ile1 M1fissiun i R B~tt r y' S ~ p 0
_ , i ~ ~ ~ _ ~ a + i Lake T z e~ , o u l h ( P o o ~ Ig ~ o i au
` P rk ~ ° " ~ ~ , , ~ ~ .,l Proposed TY~iI System ~ ~ ~ ~ Ro~ Q , . I
e~o,e~. , Poo ~ ~ ~ ' ` - " ~ ~ T - nu~~ tu~° v i = ~
~ Q Y ( 1 ~ ~~,u ~L, , ~ ~ ~ r~~r ~ • • • • • Existing Trails ~ w.. t ~ ~ ° m ~a O 'l o I
~ ~ ~ i .!0 ill ~al onr Rortualty o o c o~ Proposed Trstls
ec u z i st ~ g P~rk n~' ~ n Ld ~ - , 9 r , 7'~o nship Ilsll ~ C~m Brlfou r ~ ~ t ~ I 1 ee
r f ca►~o ~ ~ ~ Pro osed PArks ~e lit ~~n~ M She le~ P ~ ~ 6ch ~ " 6th ~ . ~ I ~ p'i ~n r _ - ~ukc ~
- ~ '!L ~i-~'~', ~ ~ - ~ R ~ ~ ~ < 6 ~ • o
i i n ! c`"•n t ° ~ n - IIQth " ~ . '2 I o; 'i i,h ~ ~ ~ Proposed Special Use Arca ~
~ ~ ~ i~ > e ~ ~ 2d~ - ' ~ ' ~ 'r 0
~ ~ ` ~ o ~ ~ ~ PPO QSCa CORiQ1U[ll PBC~( _ IMh ~ _ ~ P ~ / I. ~ b 4 ~ d 3 16 0 ~
~ r i ~I ~ ~ i~ • l Proposcd Neighborhood Park - l TR~f IAIh ~ E , iJ1fi ~5~i I~ Park
/ ~ ° 5% ~ - _ 7 • RiS ' ~ L' F .4 ~ I i 1 ~il i ~ 21t ~ ~•~1 1 n4 !t , IOtd y~ ~ '~I ~
~ ~ I ~ v ~Jst - , - .~t ~tft y ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ` ` 1'ie P~nrk 4 ~ a r ~ ~ t ~1. ~ ~ , l4th _ , 2 cb ~
~ ` . _ _ Dishman , o ~ ~ . i ~ ~ i
Hilb ~ ; ~ '-x~, ' ~ _ _ _ ~ Prk ~ ; f~ ~ ~ '
~ ~i 1 ~ . ~ I.OC8t10i1 1 ~ ~ Vlap Location
t •r,, 0 0 ~ f { r 7 afUHp~ ~ I ~ 1 ~
~ • ~ P~rk ~ , , ~ Caade ~ I . ~
. tt~ ? ~ I ~
w~ ~ D,te:12R3108 ~ 7ata ° ~
E P ~o ~ a I l ~ D ~ P
~ e~u . ~ ~c c , re ~ ~ . .
M _ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ - _
48tA ~ Ihh 4Tdi 2 Mfles
Ca+lnrv ~ ~ ~.S ~ Z~ t6 ~ ' I ~ } I ~ } ~ } I Il cr ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I
(.an~ervttioe ~ ti ~ ~ Nofirt: The lqlormat~on shoH~n on drrs n~ap ta complltd fron rs conoJedfrom vcrlars
~ Morrow ~ ~ aoancts cad u subjec~ 1a cons~at! revlsion Tht Gfy nxtkes ~r r7re City makas no darncs
OIIStTYt~00 ~ s~, ~ C ~ or guWmdets uboul fhe arcurnry o~ c~arency oJrfiLs ninp an $ ~ ~ ~ e~►e.aty d~d~ms t;abrl~n~ for mors and om~,rtn►u !n rts a cy ojrhts map crnd vgrJforu !n its Cvrrlents.
~ ~ To rm rontacl ~he Ct o S kcsre Vd! , Cor 6~ ~ ~ ~v ~1~ ry kcste t'dlty, Contimunitv,
~ D~eveJop~ner~Depurtment, Dfvfsion ojPfarpung, (S09J 9~I-1 e Gattr ~ ~ ~ ~ • ung. (309) 921-1000 Development Depa►tmmt
y Hnllcu ~ ' ti emaa~.r~n~c~hors~e~'dlc?•,CommrnityDsvelopmeatlkp~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I 1 ' I I I ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ~ ~ ~ I 1
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i
, ~ I ~ I ~ I ~ o d ~ - ~ ' - ~ c c ~ I I ~ c c - c c - o a c r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r v. ~ C c c - C c ~ r .vi'~ ~i ~'s ~ • • f i! i~ oE o ~ c U. c c ~ . s a .
~ Y, v. ~ ~ _ - c, ~ ~ ^ ~ ----~----'~'----6-~ri)•^- - --1---- • ----T-- ~ ----r------ ~ i ' ~ ~ ~ 1~ ~ ~ ~ w s -r r - r i . . 1 i i i i i i ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~x- ear ewer ro ec ~ , , , ~ ~ , , , , ~ ~ , , , , ~ ~ rojects
, , , ~ ~ , , , , ~ , , , ~ ~ ~
, , , i ~ ~ , ~ , ' ' ' ' - ' ---=r~ _.`b111~_-_- ~ ~ . --~_J__~~~ 1_ ~ 'T r I - 'T f s , _ _ _ . ~
~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ i ~ , I i i ~ i i i i i i i~ i i
~ ► ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ i i i ~ ~ i - :OtO ~ ~ ~ i i • i ~ i t i ~ t~ i i
~ u~~s ~ ~snn :.~aii~-t-- ~ ~t _ ----~-----i~---- ~~n~~y,~t~ ~~ii~i~•.. . u.«~:~:,~~: i~ - i T- ~ ~ ~ i ~
. ~ ~ ~ ~ i , , , , ~uU5 ~ ~ i ~ i I ~ a i .Qu' 2uti i.I)JH i i ~ty of , ► ~«n.M~. z ~
, , ~_ous : Le end , - .uoe g S okane ~ ~ , ~ ' z9 ~ ' ,
~ •p ~ ' ' ~ -1-----~---- _~I'LU~~___•--------~ ~ - - ~ -------___i k. ~ I ~ ~ " ~ i ~ ~ CI Of S kane Vall BOUn
~ , ~ ~ ~ P~ ~Y ~Y ~ i ~ ~ i _ ~ i i i i ~i~il, i ~ i i i MY
~ ~ i ~ . ~~~T ~ ~ 'f ~ i i ~ i Urban Growth Area ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ Fn., n. 1 ~ ' (
Z?QU ~ _ ~ ~ I • _ _ ~ _ - - ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ - - 'ud~i• ~ _ ~ ~ ~ - `rudi1~`'K _ - _ ~t=1V(1_ _ . . - ~ - - - ~,~a ~ R; ~ - - - - - ~ ;~;,,.a,~,9 of Mil ~ •ood ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' Munic~pal Areas
i ~ x ToR n ~I ~ i I ~ i 5 i a ~ ~ ~ i ~t~~~`` - ~ ~ i i ~ k I
~ ~ ~ ~~i F4acke~~e~~1,: s t~t*' - c ~v~ k * i i ~ , ; i M~~n,l•~ ~ weter Bodies ~ ~
~ ~ A~,~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ _ ~4 ~ ~~{~IU,,,r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ } ~ ~ ~ 11r~ni,,mmcn .~~c ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ _ ~ _ _ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ r _ ~ ~ ~ _ _ f _ _ _ ~ _ _ - ~ 7~.~~ . ~ i: 1~cA~' 1 hti''U, ti~an7~CI~A~~ p~ I I 1
~ Knoiti+~r 1:(y{li~ _ la~L~ru~; ~ ~ ~~~i ` n;~.:l~~d~~~~ r ' Ci of S ok9ne Ville Sewera
2 9 d' r ~~•nti~ t ~ e ~ ~ i i t Y P Y I I , ~ r~ ~ , ~SFttur SR+~a9'„~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ p -'A«fi 5~ ~~uz~ ~ , , Si~ Y ear C~pitil Improvemeat PI'n
~ ,~n ~ ~ . ~ ~ Cl j 0~: _ ~3~ ~ . ~ . \1~swn:loe ~Ius~tu~Msc _~hlsil _ ~ _ - ~l~c~iun~ltic 11~~aii~n, - - Alusicm~rlve \IiuHn•.~1~eyQ-~ ?.lusion~.4tc ~ ic~- - - - - ~ ~ ~
s'k L•~be i ; Q „ A ; ~ ~ ~y 6 Year CIP (2005-2010) ~ a ~~14- ~ ( a: - .l) ti lklr~q~,{j~ ~ 1
, S~D~~t , - = = - x ~ ~ ~ ' , Lake ~ i i ~ ~ .i;io € ~ d~ , a,. R~r,..~~ ~ ~ Scwercd 6~ ~ c:' _ ol u 3 ~ otd ~ 1' , w e - ~ i =~ei4n.chrm$R9n,~n ~r,.~a~,rh
~ t' ' ~ C J ~i '~i{1~ 11 P. ~ ,iV~)U ~ ~ ~ e~~ - - • ~ - r.,.+.~.~•,.~~c ic~alu3~M~~e t3n,a aat~.~r: t3ichlu~y7+te-~0) Bmudwyy,lK~ ~,~,ay,AY~ S ~s : , i,,~,,,: ~008 ~ Interceptors
z O i ' Au:~,~ ~ti,.,, ~ ~ ,i ~ ~ Collectors
~ .°e ';all:,u:~;~.1+~a 1'~lieyu•~~~Atic 1'allty,a}r1t~t) ~ ~ ~ x ! i s~iN'`~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ 1~~ .OIU ~ ~d ~ t~ .u~ _ouA ~,,,d,~ Zu~i~ Addreu Gn
~ ~ i i i ~ ~ ~ ~ 'i: , ~ '~c S~ir~uc~~.~~:r S~tr~gtr,l~c tipra~3c~Avc $~:a,uc~Atie Spri,`titcAtr ~au: A r 1rna~v:•.4cc ti;~„-.~;~uaY~ ~ r.~
iY - °AFy!tticuyiB~~:d ~•4 - A~lewuv~dlvd ry,l ~ ~ ~ „j~~,•uyo~~;~• ,,s - - - ~ ~ ~l0) ~ Thu~•a~: ~ ~ } ~ A~~~~`~YIt~ . ir I
SY- ~ ~ ~ I,~~:,1I~~Aer, Fuui;~i•A~'e ~ 1 i Fontt~`~~i FnuP.h~Acc '~~III$"~ShFl1Pl' _UUi) : ~ L►_Ul~1" 1 ~ 1. ukr i i
~ ~ ~ - - -IIJ9 .>011 _ti~u_i - ~~1 E:ghtL Avc f:i~InrAcc ~ - _ _ _ _ _ , ~~ahih~r~~c EiEdiL`rA~c Lighdi~l~t - - ~ . Ligttl.A~c - ~
~ ~ ~ -i ~ 1 I ~ ~ c _ ~ i ~ I ~ ~ ' ~~~QR ~ . 1
[q A i ' I ; ~ ~ ~ ~ '-~!u`~ T L I ~ ~ 0. ~ L ~ ( ~ I
~ 2(1(I) i , ~r ; ~ - - - -1G~! . _;r,iill _ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ - 4 f6th~~~c y lht!~.•.1rc lbih".~~:• lnthrAie - ~ ~~v1~t -r~
I •S'a ~ ~ I ~ ~ 1 1 I ~+^4. I I I ~ ~ I ~ i. Rd Q I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ . .
~ • ~ ~ ~ I , I - ~ ~ ~ I
I ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ~ ~1; ~ ~ .{11U '~IN1J- - - ~ I _ _ _ _ I _ _ _ _ ( - - - J- _ ~ ~ ~ I _ _ - -1- ?4th•~1~.c '_a;1:M~e - ~ - - - ~ ~ _1~ - - - ~ ~ - - - -1.~ ~ r ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~
, ~ i , T , ~5~h•.,~ ; i ~ i i ~ Ma Location i i i i ~ t ~ ~ i P L.ocation
~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ° i ' OD9 ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~ 1 ~ ~ 1~ I ( I ~
~ ~ ~ I I k ~ I I ~ i 1 ~ ~ I I ~ I ~i , ..I ~ - ~il.~ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ ~ _ ~ _ ~ _ _ - - i?IIN, ~ ~~,u-•----a-----~----i-----~-----~----#• - U. ~_~,a~,~ - i ~ ~ i i
~ i ' i ~ i ~ i i ' i ~ i DAA
~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ i i ' i ~ ~ i i , ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ _ i . i ~ ~ i Dtte:12R3108 , i ~ , ' i ~ i ' , i ~ i
I I ~ i = ~ I I I ~~~U_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~L ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ J~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ / . ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~L. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ i- ~ f 1 ■ ~ I ~ 1 I ~ p ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ I ' I ~ I t I ~ • I ~ I ~ ~ 1 ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L. c , , ~ I 1 • ~ ,
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I ipl~'I ~ ;;~'t, - ~ ~Ull ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 . I
~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ I j ~ ~ I ~ ~ r~ ~i~111 ~ ~ - ----~-----~----~~-------~-------yU(1 •ti-----~----~~------ -~I , 7~ ~OU') ath~~c ~ ~ ~ ~
~ i i ~ i i „ i ~ i i i 0 0.5 1 2 Mtles 2 Miles
~ ~i ~ ~ ~ + ' ' i i ~ ' ~ ' ! ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I ' ~ i ~ i ~ ~ , ~ ~ i ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ h'o~icc: ]he i arma~mn slaxn on Ih~s n is co '1td m v~
i i ~ i_ ~ i i i ~ ~P ►4W /^v i i ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ' ' ' , i i ~ ~ ~ soumes and ts subjecr to coratw revulort T1re C~ry rnakrs no dc :PmpiledJFom varlous ~try nrakxs ra dalms
i i i i i ~ ~ _ i - - - c ~ i ~2~ ~ c e = a eu ~bouf Ik accur ~ ar twn o Ihis and ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ r , a+~ ~ ~ I ~ i c c - ~ ~ - , ~ r~ h ~ ~ essl disdNrtu l~abJl ~ or enors and omt~tions tn fu aonlci rthis nwp and
a ~ , _ 4 . ~ - - - - - S✓A11 _ ~ Y em t; _~~ul~~._-__~•~ v; ~ ~~----=~-----`i-----,-----~ ----~-----~-----'-----t'--- ----fi-- T i TornnfvmacurarycoNadtheCiryoJSpokcaxYd1ey,Comm~u -----I- - I ~ ~ T ~ ~ ~ I rions in tts aonlents. r Vdlcy, Commumty
i i ~ i ~ ~ i i i ~ i ~ i i ~ i ~ i De~cf opmrnt Deparhmnl, Drvlsion oJPlr~r~rr~g, (S09) 911-! 000 ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ produa oft6e CI of uu V , Caa~miq Dn~do at iAme (309) 921-1000.
~ ~ I t I ~ I 1 I I ~ ~ ~ 1 dopaest Departmeat
~
~ ~ i i ~ _ _ _ _ - ~ - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -1 - - -I - - - -----1 - - ~ ~ ~ ' ~ I
~ ~ ~ ~ , , , , , a , , ~ , ~ 2s ~ .
, , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , , ,
~ ~ ' , ~ ~ ~ 35 ' 3b 31 3? ; t i ,a 3~~ ~ 33 34 ~ ~ I n 35 e a , i i ~l~ t , , ,
~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ I ' ' M ~ ~
t i ~ ~ ~ ~ i i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i
i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Y cl _ '5,.,.. 1 1 I . ~ I.. q _ . ~'~.~1 _ _ F ~
( I I ~ 1 ~ ~ i ! Rn'h
Clty -of ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ' . ~ w~ ~ Spokane , -
~ 3 ~1~ Q9a ~ 1 ( 1 ~ I rJ . ~ ~ ~j . ~
, Le end ~ g i ; ; ~ : f
~ _ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ; -;ti~ I ~ p;,+~'J ~ ~ ~ City of Spokane Valley Boundary i D1II1dary
~ ' 1 _ _ ~ - - - - - . - - ~ - - - - ~ ~ - S'~ol,an~ Ri~:~r ~ 7'Oyl'q 0~I~~~ti 00(~ ~ ~ Urban Growth Area
e' ~ , ~ ~ i ~ .i . , ~ - ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ € ~ ~ . , ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ 1 Othcr Municipal'ttica i ~ orictm ~ , ~
0 ~ i i Calld ~ o~ ~ 1 ~ , ~ ~ t 1z^ _ lu ~ d o ~ , adlands , ~ 4 ' I , <a ~ ~
- ; ~i }:.~,x Kno~t C ~ ~ ~ e: ~ ~ n ~ y 4' ~ ~ _ ~ ~ - (
, ~ _ ~ --j , DNR strcams ~ ~ uor, q , ~ 1
' i' ~ . Ci ' o~' t ~ ;t ~ ~ - ■ - ' - ~`3tCf BOaItS -I - _ p m D Y .
~ n : % ~ Ltber , ~ ► ~y c ~ ~.~Rrti i ~ y ki S ie ~ 5~ S i
I ~ Bo c Booa T ~ Lake ~ . I ` s~ ~ a>--- a > ; cW~~~~o ~ ' ' ~ ~ ~ I
~ ; w ~ e~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ 1 ; - f ; ~
I l 1~8 7 g ~ 1 S ~tf I q A~ - ~ ~ Oi `c, - ~ V ` " I '
~ . ~n,k ~ i . > ~ ~ i ~ - ~ ~ s ~ti~. ail ~ „ aaa' ~ ~ ~e , ' i ,L u ~ ~
_ 3 _ n _ ~ . ~ _ . _ ~ ~ u ~ ~
x ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~s i ~ i o ` ' !rd A,~ ~ ~ I~ :s 1
i ~ ~ _ . ~ E Shrt1~►'~ ~ , ' SI~ ~ r i
~ e ~ s. u' ~ ~ : i(!~C ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ti. ~ ~ btli s__ i .r
? _ ~ ~ i~ ~ a c ~ ' OA ° ~ ~ , ~ a - - i i , ~ ~ I ~ 1 i ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ;
t ~ r. ~ - -'~~ii i i ~ ( - J h ~ c .c. e~ 4~, ~ a.-
~ e t% ',.p,• ~ u~ la _ i I ~ I h Y ~ 14th I / ~ .A 3 ~ ~ p t i I I ~ ~ y I I_t Su~ ` F r_ P K, rr. y ~ _ ~I ~ ~
- ` ~ ° - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ , ~ 7 ~ _ ~ I ~ f ~ n ' ~ ~ t ! t 16th _ ~ ~ ~
~ C' ~ • ~ur i, I ~ 1 ~ I '~i 21 ' ~ ~ fl ' 2 ~ ( ~
I 6 ~ ~ ~S~ d . . ~1"'. `F,. . 1 ( 1 1 ~ ~ ~
~ ~ 29 ~ _ ~ ~ 1~ ' i i ~ ~ i e~ I ° ~r' i ~
' ~ ~ ~ - ~ i ~ ~ ~ , ch > I ~ - , ~ i i ~
' ~ ~ ' _ Ma Locatio~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ P ' Q z -T 1. ~ ~ L Map Location
- - - - - - - - - ~ ~ - - - - - - - - -i - - - - -I ( ^ ~ ~ ~ i,0'. ~ IJ:1;;1 I I ~ ~ I ,i.t•, i'~ 1
~ ~ i 5 ~ ~ ` i ~ , 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ' s,h ~n,~ > , - , i
1 1 ~ - ~ 1 1 1 ~ ~ ~ya ~ . ~ ) 1 /r I ~ 1 1 1 T 1 )
~ I • ~ ~ _ 35 ~ 36 31 3- D~tte:12R4108 5 3b '3 ; ~ , ,y n , i ~ ~ ~ i , ~
~ , ~ ~ n ~ ~I ' ~ p I 1 ~ 1-_ ~ 1 a P ~
1 ~ 1 ` S 1 ~ D ~ ' ~ I ~ ~ ~I~, ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ I ~ ~ I • ~ f ~ O
' . ~ ~ ' - . - - _ _ _ . _ i 1 • ~ 3 I y!~ I i ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ b'~ i ~ ; 5 : ~ ~ 2 N
~ ~ ~ s ~ _ 0 0,5 1 ~ 'crt I' ~C'- - - I ! r_ f I ~ 1} 1~ I 1~ ~ 2 MUea
i ~ ~ ^ ~ , . ~ ~1 ~ ' A'urrcr. TIw r onna1ion shauvr an Ihis ► is co Ilad ~ ~ r ~;.y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~p l~'~ p is corrptlid froin swiaas
~ ~ I I _ 2 Oi ~ sources and (s su6jecr ~a co+~tan~ rev~slon The City makrs I Q- ' ~ The City makes ra clalau
2~ ' ~t~,~c~ ' ~ ~ , nr gurnaMtta aboiil rk ac~cwary a crarrrrcy ojth~ map a 3 , ~ ~ i ~ ` eYpre~sfy durlmms llabll~tyJa enors md omusions in Its ~ ncy ojlhls nW and ' omisslora rn 1u carliNs
i ~ To co accrua conracl cJw CI o S kane Vd! , G ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ry ~ Po ~Y bkane Vdley, Convmndry
~ ~ ' ~ DevelopmenrDepmt»rent, bivision oJPlunnir~q, (S09) 911• I , ~ I ~ _ i Prodoct of U►a Ctt}~ of Spokuu Villey, Commnalq Derdopmot Ik~ anit{g, (509) 921-1 DDO. tY Derdopmeet Dep.rtsant
-,-T- , : p , / f p Aertiae ' ~ / ~ ~
.'"~G" ~y v~_Fnrcb__ / i w s ~ ~ ~ ~ • . ~f : ~ ~ . e_ . ~ ~ I .
l ~ a~~_ --c~ ~~,~~``t / ~.f 1 I ~ , . ~ , . a . , ; , , . -
_r~ t . , . r ~ ~ x ~ i ~ ~ ? , - ~ ~ : ! i ~ , ~ ; ~ ! - ~ ~dp • y . • • •
~ i e a i a s tabitat
~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ - ~ ~ -l ~ - I~' = ~ ' - r - • ~ ~
, ~ ~ _T., / c~ ~ C' ~ = F 1 ~11- ~ ~r--. n,. ac r 1~ _ ~ Y m _ ~ ~ aa _ ~ _ _ ~ / . ~ ~ ~ ~ e
~ ti ~ ~ , S ~ L w a { i y ~ ~ _ _ a t,aa`` r T ~ ,h- 1 • -r- - -
~ `i1 -5 B '~r, , ~ ~ q. ~ ~ ~ ;9' ~ , _ / _ i H'~~i~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! { ~ . I ~ l , ~ r. ~~h
ti . ~1.\ , ^ • ~ i•s - . . , _ , ~ ^ „I ~y ~i _ ~ 'Y~ `T ~
~ ~ ~i~., / ~ t f C ~ ~ ( A ~ 1 ttOl I ~ _ ; ~ ~ W -r - - ~ / ~ ~
~ ~ _ - ~ Le en ~ . "~So- ~ , ~ . S ~ r ~ ° ~ . 3~` ~ ' i
~ T- - ` ~ ' ~ ~ {Ci of Sry~kane Vallp~ Boun~'~y ~ ~ y - i I ~ t"' ~J J ~ i f t ~
~ w ~ QYf ~tuclia ~ ~ ~ - - E ~ ~ re~rr• u ~
-o ~ S~akan~~Rlv~r _ „ ~ > Cllffs I BhIffS f ~ ~ Rt° ~ w ~inr ~ Eudid u~ ~y _I _ iY i ' Q _ ' S.1 1 CO ~ i C ~ '~:f~' . •
_ I _ <~ax k~~ ~ - L- ~ , - ~-r- White Teiled Deer ~ ~ ~ - ~ ' u~..,~ , M c` ~ L,~4` 1
~ u,k 5 ry ~ / r ~ ~ ° ' Moosc
,r ~nr~ ~ ~ ,~~ia _ ) ~ ~ / ~ - _ K~ ~ ~1_ ~ , 7 ' ~ ~ ~ C u ~ ~ ~ ! L~dislq:
~ .r ~ ~ ~ , Eik Habnat 290 ~ ~L 1 , . ~d m ~ ~ ~ ia~ ~ \ 4
N , - ~ I - I~ : AA~i m V p!~~ "i ~ 1 ' ~TbB[t Nflh1fS~ ~CII $PACC ! ~ ~ ; ,-r
~ . a ~ OGO o ~ ntu ' r i x ~ _ z 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ s, a ~ ~ t Bo«~~ ~ s ti Riparia~ Zaae
~ fmc Smet c~' ct _ , a ~ i~ $ ~ x ~ ~ t ~wa ~ ~ -s~ > ~ , c~wd~ r- s z~ ~ c wo > ~Ca~,,i ~~a c ,
~ _ 1 ~ Waterfowl I Y ~ rarl ~lt~. .
,,w~xw` Ai1i E m°dw~Y ~'~'i l•'` - - - ~ r ~ - ~ I i -XIf[~ I > " • " - ~ i Urban Growth Area
~ ~ ~I .V lle a ~ 1 - _ a I ' ~ rta' ~ k~~Y !iidn V ~ ti ~
~ M io ~ i`n in ~ wBtGf BOdICb ~ la~~! ~ ~ 1. .
it I ~ t ~ ~ . ~ ~ I ~ ~;.a~7f_ Irt~~ ~ c 3rd 3+d ~ ~ aI a p 5;. ~-Jfr , ~ a~ I : _I_ DNR Stream ~r
~~r ~ ~ a: - ~ ( . a ~ih , ~ ,m;,' FSh~!!e~'~ _ - ~ ^'i ~ L ~r. ! ~1 K
~ ~ ~ hr ~ ~ Lake ~ - ~ S Desi ated Shoreline - ~ ~ ) ~ - ~ ~n - r i ~ e~ ~ ~ ~ i ~
~ „ ~ ~ - : ~ y~ t i ~ 1 r ~ j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~y}- ~ ~ ~ ~ Fuh Hab~tat
~ t~ o ~ - ~r. t.7 ~ ~ ~ 1 Ilth 5) ~1 i - rt, f r~l-- II ~ ~ _ ' . ~ i • i, - C ' 1 , 3~, - ~ ; ~ 4 ~ ~ , , ~ ~ ! (I~ Non-fish Habitat
l._ ~ _ ~ ~ i ~ 1Nh ~ 1kh t ~ 1 un s p ~ r: _ - i ~ t' ~ r~ ',3 ~F~l - ~ ~ ~v.~ ~ui~ui~ U~~
~ ~ T~►~, . ~ N) w' ~ l T 4 ~ ~ , , ~ , ,r < ~ . ~ , _ ~ iecn i, ,t y ° -i I ~ ~ 7'' 'l'~
~ i " . R7 ' ~Uih '~r ~ 'g ~ _ ~ '0 i } ~ - ~I ' ~ ~ ~ . .L~.. . ~ I il h T ~1 / ` ~ ti t~ + Z , B" ~ . ~ n 4j ~ ~
[,+Y ~ / 7 r ~ rt d > ~ ~ ~ ~ [ ) ~ ~ ~ i~Y 1 1~--
at~ I ~ ' ~1 ~ 1 ' ~ Rr . ' 4 0 ~ ` ~v ' ~ ~ n~~~ } 21st ~ ` ~ ~ \ . ' ,
` ~ ~'41r•~ .1 ~ d^,~'~' y ''~~,.y _ ' ~ ' ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ Y i .
~ , ~ ~ ~kk- ~Iq ~ SC:~„ ~ ~~~~~•~~r. ' ~ ~ Ma Location / ~ p ~ ~ , ~ R ~ { I Location
~ J _ ~ ~ , ~ ; ~ b / i ~ ~ Y U ~ ~ ~ ~ - W E ~ ,
~ ~ s~ Cy , ~,;5,~ ~ ~ ,J i j' , - 3 U , .
~ i I ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~'~i . _ ~ . . ' ~ , ` - Q T; • i ~ ~ - ]:~i,~ ~ ~ i } i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ 1 t , ~
~ ~ ~ti; h~ . ~V;'il~.. ~ L ~ ,,,s:r~.,_. ~ ~ I ~ ~ I : ~ , ~ ~ ~ . = r~. - I , ~ Date.11R4R008 - ~ ' ~ ' ~a • / ~ i.j:~ , ~ ~ r ~ ; ~ ~I~ ~ ~ ' ti ~ ~ . ~
~ ~'~~..:~~:,~,d ~ 1 ~~<1u,. t~ y ~I ~ J f!- ` :-r ` ~.v 'rl ~ yf 4; 1 -k . ~ (s , ; ~ ~ . / J ti' 7\ 1 ~^S:. F I j, I r . C 1 i R . ~ I - r: , 1.~.. ~ I , 1 „ I , ~ J r ' ~ ,
. r - . ~ • _ . ~ ~ ~ ; r E, . ~ ~ ~j r, . ~~~~I~, ~ I ~ , , ,a / ~ , i ,z ~ - ~ ~ , . . f ~ :rJ ~ t. ~ C.~..: ',Ct~l'' `n ~ r I ~ r
~ / _ r ~ " , r,~- ; . ~ u, , ; i~~ ~ ~ . , _ ~ ~ , / ~ - 1-~ , : ~ ~ ~ ~ ' I~ ~ I d -L ~t ':I ~ I'~_ '':;i. ~ ~ r.;~-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'J ~ I
+ 5~ 5 ri~ t ~ 1y'~V A~ ~ 1 c , i `'m . ' i A ~ ~7,..1'''' f: !?d~ ' ~ ~ + / ' ~ w~ t , c' , ~ a~tL -i c' ~1~;ti;, d~ , - ~ I r ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ,~I t- - Mi ' 1 " r'1 ( I
r~•(llCiu4se}~~tk~h~r r ~ ~ 1 0~-}~' l~" ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~.S 1 ~~t6 ( i~~„ ~ `I~, ~r / . ~ ^ ~ ~ ~,C ' ~ ~ = ti--~~-,. c f ` ' I ~i r,+ ' 1 I 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ I 2 Milcs ~ I
C~1~'~Nt ~ ~ a~ ✓ ~ r . ~ ~ , , ~ _ ~ ~ / ~ I._~ ~ . / / . , ~ .i.~~._ '~j.tfj~r ,1.'1 , ~1~ ~ " ~ n I ~ / •s , c ~ ~ ~ ~ ' n~ra; 71u ~nfarn,ation thou~n on thls mgp Is compll~d from v~ri ~n3ptled ftom varioii.s
s~ I ~ , f I / / . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , , . ~ . -~r , ~ , ~ .rJf . / ,~,urces and is sub ec► ~o con~sta~r ~evision. The Gry mokts no elu, ' ~j ~",i ~ ~ a ~ iSS~~t, I ~ ~ r . / ' / ~ .iry makes no claim,t
sa,~, ~ ~ s' ~ , , r / _ ~ ~~r guc~m~eu aaoat ~he acavucy a cu►renry ojthis map and ti•- ~ s.',..: , ~ t ~ / ~ ~ U 4i h: -c ~ • t. l I . ~ I,; ~ ► , . ~ / ~ ~rressf~~ drsrlaims liabUrry fo~ errors mrd omisslons in t1s cottlen Ihis map and rons in its rnntents.
~ , r ' ~ t ~ ~ . ` . r ~ ~ I ` , / ~ ~ ~ ~ ii , , / , i_ ro rrnr acn+ra caco~rttocl fht Gry o Spukwie Ydley, Comrmtn ~ tl Y~~ ~ ~ - ~ , . , ~ I Val/ey, Community
. ~ ~ ~ , i , ~ r~. ~ ' - , . ~ ~ ' ~ ~ , , ~ !~2tirlapmenlDeparlmext, DivtstonofPla►m1rg, (S09J 9?I-lOUO. y ~ . , . / / ' . , ~ / j' t.. . , ~ c+u , ! ~ yy , ~ / , I : / ~ , , ~ I ~ . f rodod af t6e C1 of e Y , Commud Derdo meat De irtma (509) 921-1000. bpmeot Departeaenl
, / b SAoku ~IIrY h' p P ~ / ' ~ ' r ,fi ~h! ` .I .,l, - - - - ; .r'--: _
i _
n~ Department of Community Development
PIanning Division
2009 .
Com prehensive Plan
. .
Amend ments Review Sessioiti..
lvlarct-i j, 2.uug
Lead Planner: Mike Basinger, AICP
Planning Team: Karen Kendall & Marty Palaniuk
Planni.ng Manager: Greg McCormick, AICP
March 3 1, 2009 Comprchensive Plan Amcndments 2009
Department of'Community Development
~
Vall Planning Division
s
Comprehensive Planni*ng
The ~
Spokane Valey Comprehensive P-an
(SVCP) la.NTC" ni-if- q NT; Q; r-,~ f~vr
Spokane'k L ~ ~pefiou ana
~_ic- y c~uliiig~, c~,_y e~.~~ responds to the requ
ir ements of
the Grow h
t
Management Act (GN4A)
March 'I 1. 2001) Comprrhensik-c Plan Amendments, 2009
C 'i) H 0,"" A 4"~
anc Department af Community DeveIoPment
i
Planninb Division
E0v
Comp.rehensi*ve Plan Amendments
■ Comprehensive P- an amended annu.al-Y
■ November 1-~' 2008 cL~t off~for app_ications
. . ~onui-nssion ■ P_anniii(y :ruonc tiearin~
t) IL
s March 129 2009
■ March 26, 2009
■ Counci I Study Sess ion March 31, 2009
■ Council w sl Reading Apri- - 4, 2009
■ Counci'- 2nd Reading May 12, 2009
■ Appea'-s to Growth Management Hearings Board
March 31, 2009 Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2009
~ ~ tTvNAIIor}SH)KA`+fV Department of Community Development '
Se
jVal Planning Division
4 Silpte-Speci*ricldap Amendments
"
• Private'-y Initiated
~
CPA-O'-a-09
• 3 City initiated
CPA-02-09
CPA-03-09
CPA-04-09
March 2"11, 2009 Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2009
''0`~TY-""Department of Community Development
r
WKane
Planning Division
2007 Aerl*al Map
. I F~•-~--~.-
,
r
. ~ ' • ~ ~ ' t,J~ . ~.al ' ~ ~ ~ k L ~ Y
J ~
~ ~ ► ~ ~
.
.
. . ~ ,
Ot , - _ -
' r T ww ' ~'~t~l
i"S~'- it.rr.. ~a.... .r L .y • a 4111 . .
~~L^ ~ . ■ l.~L.~J~.
ivw
~ j`I v n. ' i rP,~ ~ C I ►
L.J
- "i~ [ t
. ~ i ; ~I" _ ti
t
VY~ " I~' Y
ir
191
.
ori
► .
-AL
, . ,
~ - ~tM F,. ~•.,i J
w
,,+.,r~. • ~ ~
~I ~ -•.~~"f~'1~' • -r4 ~ i
; Y + ~ . , . . . . ~ ~ ~.~:..c" ,~~„~'~~~,v~ . ~ ~wT
~~1 t' ~ '+N - .A
CPA-01-09
'Pllfllln'I ~ ' ^~~cf
1 ~ A. ~ ' -
r
~
March 31, 2009 C'omprchcnsive Plan Amcndmcnts 2009
ent of Communitv Development , Departm , , .
'p°ne ll Planning Dxvlsrorl
;000~
' Ian
Comprehensive
~ ~ r~,~~i~~~~~~.~->>~►~~i~~ - - ;,=--~~~c~~:,~,~i•~?~~,r~~:~~~: uliil iQiin5i1P.i bhc
-~1-09 ~:~='"'.Deusitv
E z
IRc Idcutiiil-'
y,
~ ;r_ ~lYl~~ = = ~ ) ti~ Dcusltc Rc~ti clrtUl;
1':ui~'l'~ _ S ~M~`,~` ~
s ~~(1!!l►Tli ' ~ f '
z
L
6th
- ~
~n
PfiUltclQuasl-`~c'~
pnblic ~F r 1 k'
~ ~
N
k~
CeDh'q!
~~h PubHdQu-Mi•Pnbilc =
. . r Valiey
$fA~01' Hlgli
~ ....i
~
` Camprehensive Plan Acnendments 2009
March 31, 2009
c nrNA tu.r.rau,orv • ' " 1
~ Department of Community Development i
ane
Vallev- ; Planning DYVisYOn
' I
Zonln Plan
C:F
~
~
~nd
1-21nd ~ CPA-01-09
:
~ z
i. J 11 ^
' 3rd
~ J
~
V, • tit ~lth z~;il, ,
h
: -f ♦ .
~ 1 c I ~ ~.th ~
R3
,C
_ St h Sth NEF-1
~
• - ~
y Gth
>
r
6th 1 1- h z
,
r. • , _ 3
CF ' 4 ~
. ~
fQ R~~ Ceutral
I `'alley C'F `
~ 5enior High ~
March 31, 2009 Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2009
m~~• "~r'~."'.~'r"~"~'~Y Department of Community Develo ment
Spo`kane P ~
~Valle Planning Division
.
2007
Aerlal Map
c: ' i1 ~ '
lppll-
` ;~.•'~.:~"'~Y ~+•-~---r.r~+~i'-~.. _
.
- . .
' " ~ - - , ~ti~l t~ i ~ f''~~i'l~°~• .
• ~ I R ~ I t~~
M~ ~ ~ _ ~ ' ~ If 'I t ' •
Hh Z
~ _ ~ ►I • w ~.t ~ ~ . ~ G l
CPA-02-09
I .i ~n •~•~~~~a ~ ~ _
1 s"A
i
r J ~
I ~y°'~~.~ ~ ~4 ~ ~ +'4 ' ' • `
---~~rL- .
,
4tn ~
.5
, . .
t h
~ ~ r~ ~ W.r-"•~r!q , _ ~ ~ . . , , ~ s~~ ~
► - L ~ la ' -f -~ii► uk
~ ~ ~ I I , ,~F • .
r~.. ~J~_ 'Y,• ~ t~~,..M~+ - ~ ,,7 r. G t~~'~~ ~;ai i' i
1 ~ ~ • 1.<~~_-tl i~ j r - " ~ ~
~+!4 _ ~ Y ~ " # _ _ ~ ~ ~
O~' i !
' ~ • ('omprc icnsive ' an Amen mcnts ~UUW
i
c:m~u~ir,nratiwfv mmunitY Development ~
.
, P De artment of Co
~1~°~ , Planning Dlvision
j~alle
.
Comlprehensive Plan
t ~~inttuiiiit~. I
, •
~ _ ~ i ~ , 4
I', ~
,
; -
NubllrPnbl lr
d ~r{t~l►hoi•ti~~~
-Q~
' CPA-02
~ r Ut~psll)' ~l ~ ~lli~~i~~li~•n~,;t~;l:t~,i~:i~';it~„~I
~
~
. .~L~X .
~ c~trnsnc.t;cCAl ~ .
~
.
t
~
- AI
(.ei- ptp:Ity RrsfBentltil ~ "y ;
~
~
r.
Gy
Pnbltc/Qnnsl-
1 Ptib,ir Camprehensive Plan Amendments 2009
March 31, 2009
De art~ment of Community Devela~~~~~en$ ~
",rt 'n~..' P Planning ' 'Dlvision
1
'
Zoning Plan
~
. . ~...-w..
i
_ 'i.} r'r.T+,.• o-~f`• . ` , ' . , . ~ .
+ ,1 t h 1 ~is , r
? ~a:- 1,~ k s
ri,, rl
~ir l ±w
.i•i ~a
\C
~ C~
ad
,
C 1 ~A ll?r"0~)
~ N - 1
-4tn Ath
vc
R1
I~
~ i R3
11F•1: i a ~'IF-:
-
x
~
Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2009
March 31, 2009
n~. `"r""'!, ""Dcpartment of Community Development
1*~
,;O*Valley, Planning DivYSion
.
2007
Aerlal Map
~ ~T7,: • • I~~I~ItI.. _-~y_J~a~~ ' ..rw •r.-..., ..,~.w.~,.~.,.,,
.i ~f,,~;~-~' ~ •~i~i-+~Mi~~~t.a ~tiN• ML~ . , a_
~r -~Ji~~,~~,
► ~ ~'A~'f
a:Ai,7
►
♦.r • _ ~ 1 ~ vo, 'r ' . .y
k.ZA
5 ~ ~~Y ~
t!~~dCE~,tr~:t~•.4"4~'~l
~ , ,r" ( ~ 1 ► ~ ~
CPA-nt.po a
~-ON
c,~-~~
t
~
_ , x A~~' ; ~ ~~I~~'°3 ~
~~r~ ~ ; ~ ►
D
ooh~ AVe
~
~~.4~;. ii+~t~~ •Lw ~ I~ r [ .
e i i~~ ~
Aft
March 1( ,2009 Comprehensive Plan Amcndments 2009
~ CR~K~ItI'a'SMIK~VF~ Department of Community Development ~
S,
aU Plann~ng Division
.
Com prehensive Plan
~ ~ .
a. _ ~ 1=7
( ~1lililllli!;1ti ~_~~~11!'1!t'fC1;l~ / ~ ~ (
,J
~ , .
~ . • "t ~ ,
~ ; 1 ` • 1'J` ? ~r . • L'~,w;
. r ! ~t'!ti'~!•~
'11\~I ~Il-.,..., , . - ~
- - -
~ - ~ ~
1 . ~ ~ H J^
~i.
MiIX11'C11
r
CPA-03-09
~ M
~
h
~Shu
E.am nc w
+u c
L- -Densin~'Resiclenrtal ~
i
~
0
ro
d '
~ I
March 31, 2009 Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2009
ni Dcvelopment
DeAartrnent of Commu ty
~
Planning Division
' Plan
Zoning
. . . . " ~ ..a. . ' . , . , . .
1 .
,
1.
it
>mtn
~
~
~.5.,~:Si~. ,+:•7:: 'n„ X
;:y,•.y.:^s
CP a-03-09
~
I CF
~
Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2009
March 31, 2009
I
~ne `""4 ""`.I~P"`"vf`~ Department of Communit3' DeveloAment
S~a
./svaq Planning Divisian
2007 e
Aeria Map
• ~
i
Ct~a-o4-o9 , IVerSIU2 AVe
~ ~ ~ ~,r • .°I~.
,
.
„ : .
- ti =~"'=~^s~c--. Y "i!
.
t+lw ♦I~~~IY'"~ k_"~-. ~ - .
`1 ~I t
~ 1... - N ~ _ ~1 d ~ c ~ ~ _
~
,
,A
1 f
~ r' • ,'1 ~ I
r ' M i f
- • _I « ~
~ - - -
1• `
~
d r.
r `
r
r'
~
March 31, 2009 Comprehensivc Plan Amendments 2009
. ~
~:~~.,~,rs~«yrv i Development
~3'
De artment of Commun
..@n~P Q vision
~ ~U Planninb Di
~
' Comprehensive an
.
.
. . i .
L4~~ ~~s~ri• ~ia~p~~
~
CPA-04-09
~
.
; . .Y. . ;
. . . ~ .
l ~ ^ ~ { s r > > j ~ f h~~ ih-*N.~t~4~t.~~
. . , . ' 17 . • r t. 91 ~
, , 4 ~ , ' ~ t ; +~"t ~ 1 .
S t V1~ r~ r t t i-~ kt 1 A~l~r a~i ~ tStt 11 ~TL
r
J f~
r ~ 1 ! v l~ s~ t! ~ ~l{! 1l. . A~ K.y ~ ..4 4~} rt~l.~ ~It~ n. i
1.'~ ~4 i t}V 1 O~~f a t~ Fff~1r i! . ~F •b •o~~s~~~{9a3,y~r].jjt(U ...Tt'~ # 'lft ~,~:s
{j f~'i + t Jr~} rrj~S'_>nat t~~+.fi" t rro. .
i i
M~yy >~M ~ _ ~ r1~t ; ~ ,y •`tt.~ , ~'~r ~ ~
54v.' w~Y1•...1 ~ ~7 4 , } }~~1 .Y 1„ ~ . A~ ~ *f 441i~ 1 A~ ~ Y { ~
r 1 nr ' ~t r0'~ - .t.. . b .It a Nr-"Y~ 4~ ~J ~l ..jl ~ ( '1 ~s+,i~ e .
~ .s ,LLr .J s:. ~t ~ ~ + ,•rft{ ~ .rf~ , 1~:.- ls.
•;\ilsr i[, e,~ ~ ~z!' t~ t~. , k-.>: r~., t.t
":r1°•?~~ , ~ , y ,'z .2
Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2009
March 31, 2009
Department of Community Development
.306gne Planning Division
' Plan
Zoning
,
R.3
- - i
CPA-04-09
- - ;
b N . ~ {.t." tif•...
n.~'. m l I . . _:1. ~ . ~
. ~ . . . . . • ~ . . ~ ' . . ' , ,
.
. ~
.
t i ~ ,.i ~1 $7
Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2009
March 31, 2009
".I
Department of Community Development Planning Division
EOVa4oo
. . .
Ci ni iated Text Amendments
• CPA-05-09 (Chapter Use)
2 - Land Update Land Capacity An
a^ysis Tab-e 2.• 2011 UGA Upclat~
Add annexatlon goa-s and fo Sets tI1e -franlcwork for anne,,aLiUJ
Pub--I*c/Quasl*-Pub--I*c Map Designation
Marcli 3 1 , 2009 Comprehcnsivc I'lan Amendments 2009
K.y y epaY-tmeu 1
Diyisio~
plan~ing
r~ .
9 colat
-
No~~' ~'`nes ~tiddle Sc
. 4 .
'
r
-use ,
1 ~
Z.
,
p
~p
. ~ -
nat -
-
~
Z
5
l "
`
1
~
~
endmen~ 2009
Compxehe~ive PIaY► Am
i
'H"""'Sr`;s"%4'Department of Communi Develo ment
E an c t3' A ~l1 Planning Division
,
P11J.'r-
1* c/Quasi-Public Property
1
n
aat Ce~ -
~ r ~ E~at
I
r-r
rt--
~:J
11- (r
,4-
1 '
✓r
~
I
~
~ i
,
De artment of Community Development '
Sp~kane p ,
OsVall Planning Division
~ -
A1
FY~Iw~~w~~~1 ylY1u!!enl1` Alki v ~G~ 6 ~ r /~Iki _
R r
I x
~ OGV9
I ~u
~Oqyway ' p Yallcyw °
l „
Nixan Y-
Maln nrr"izt°" I
~ i ` ,I_.
S1'MIQO ...,'-r
c ~
03
wS.~ - --a-a ~ _ - -
y~ , . WS-4
I~2 . "WS"6
~ s a~ - - MF 1 goirRC
• 190 - 28. 4f1t . ~t►'., ' Ath-- ~L ,
','~~i ` • - MI IIIr
.
7
'NS~~
: stn Y 8th ~P/osfs, Legend
P e,- ~Vw^ % 7th I ~11 ~ lir WSPa P
eth e POPID
? ~ - ~us~-
~ A ~
: t :MF~1 IL M ~ws-i
. ws 2 . ws-i ws-2
: R-4 R-3 to - ws-3
~
r . WS4
ws5
r -14th_ WS-6
4:11 ~ '16th
1 ~ ~!~T I~. 1_ ►/Vy ~ VrS-7
y .
~c
: 0 q u ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~I II III I~
~
~t~1111~1111111i111~~1~ ~ 1 r
7~~`y
J
March 31, 2009 Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2009
. . .
.
uni Development
_
cr~".t 1.,.. .I"f1C4VfV Depa~ment of CaMM
, ,ne Planning ~Division
~o`ka, , -
spr
J•.' C
-Alkf ~ ~.Qliva ~ 1/~Ieyw~Y I
~~1loywoY' t Harringtoe f
. ~ • 1, ' r
_MOIR
glvatStde
- ~ . , ' H1i111~ittlfl~l~
it111t1i1lltfiT~ 1 , ' g ~ ~p 1ot --t''1
s„4
~nirttill ,yr(
RC
MF 2 - 3rd jetr
. . t - •
dO',;; dilL.,
. Wze13014~ LeoeIld
• , fl- - =r_ xn _--W ~
OS1 W'$PoP
{~1 I
alp
8 -
~~503 I
~1' ~
WS-2
~
9"' S,i t1 h_; yYS-~1
Vth,,
: ws•2 w ~ R•d R'3
WS-8
■ws-' ,
•
a ~ :
18lh 0111119
~ ~ ~k~~►wr
~~rn
mprehensive Plan Amendmen~ 2009
Co
Niarch 31, 2009
Department ot~ CommunYty Development *619ne
Planning Division
. City Initi*ated Text Amendments
• CPA-06-09 (Chapter 3"ransportation
- Add tExt for new 'iIke Cassification
- Add n ewly deve--oped bike facilities (Map 3.2)
• CPA-07-09 (Chapter 4 CFP & Pub'-ic Services
- Update 6-yr TT
- Update WaterDistricts & We'-'-heads 4.1
(Map )
- Update Parks and Recreation 4.3)
(Map - Update 6-yr sewer 4.5)
(Map • CPA-08-09 (Chapter 8 Natura- Environment)
- Update Wet-ands (Map S.1
)
- Update Fish & Wildlife Habitat 8.3)
(Ma P. Ma rcli 3 1, ~OOt) Comprchcnsivc Plan Amcndments 2_009
WlgneDepai-tment of Community Development
.;oONWI
.n~ .VI .SI .OII
~ Plann~ a D1
.
Questions'?
March 31. 2009 Comprchensive Plan Amendments 1-009
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: March 31, 2009 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information 0 admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Computer Tablet Training
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
12-18-2007 report to council on purchase of computer tablets
1-8-2008 Council approved purchase
BACKGROUND:
Council has been using these computer tablets strictly as a type of lap-top computer for over a
year now. However, these tablets have the capability to not only satisfy and simplify computing
needs, but have the added convenience of handwriting, adding "sticky notes," and can be used
vertically, or the screen can be rotated 180 degrees and placed flat on the keyboard.
OPTIONS:
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: eventual savings of paper, toner, notebooks, and dividers
STAFF CONTACT: Greg Bingaman
ATTACHMENTS:
DRAFT
ADVANCE AGENDA
For Planning Discussion Purposes Only
as of March 26, 2009; 10:30 a.m.
Please note this is awork in progress; items are tentative
To: Council & Staft
From: City Manager
Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings
April 7, 2009, Studv Session, 6:00 Q.m. idue date Monday, March 301
ACTION ITEMS:
1. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance Airport Overlay - Karen Kendall [20 minutes ]
2. First Reading Ordinance Regarding Eminent Domain (suspend rules?) - Mike Connelly [10 minutes]
3. Mvtion Consideration: Interlocal Agreement w1City of Spokane re Eminent Domain - M.Connelly [10 minutes] 1
4. Motion Consideration: Spol:ane Countv MOU for STEP - Steve Worley/Ken Thompson [10 minutes ~
REGULAR STUDY SESSION ITEMS:
5. Studded Snow Tires (confirmed) - Joe Tortorelli, Secretary Spokane Area Good Roads Assoc .(15 minutes)
6. Batch Code Amendments - Christina Janssen (20 minutes)
7. Winter Road Maintenance Update - Neil Kersten (15 minutes)
8. Council External Committee reports - Councilmembers (15 minutes)
9. Info Only: Parks & Recreation Maintenance Renewal Contract - Mike Stone
10. Info Only: Parl:s & Recreation Aquatics Contract Renewal - Mike Stone
11. Info Only: Resolution Amending Res. 03-040, Banking Authority - Ken Thompson
12. Info Only: 2009 Amended TIP -Neil Kersten/Steve Worley [Total Meeting: 115 minutesJ
April 14, 2009, Regular Meeting, 6:00 p.m. (due date Mon, April 61
1. PUBLIC HEARING: Amended 2009 TIP - Neil Kersten/Steve Worley [ 10 minutes]
2. Consent Agenda: Payroll, Claims, Minutes [5 minutes]
3. First Reading Proposed Ordinance Amending Comp Plan - Mike Basinger [20 minutes]
4. First Reading Proposed Ordinance, Batch Code Amendments - Christina Janssen [20 minutes]
5. Proposed Resolution Amending Res. 03-040, Banking Authority - Ken Thompson (10 minutes]
6. Proposed Resolution Amending 2009 TIP - Neil Kersten/Steve Worley
7. Motion Consideration: Approval of Splashdown Contract - Mike Stone [10 minutes]
8. Motion Consideration: Pines PCC intersection Bid Award - Neil Kersten [5 minutes]
9. Admin Report: City T'inance 101 - Dave Mercier [15 minutes]
10. Admin Rprt: Agenda Items for teniative Sp City/Council Joint Mtg - Mayor Munson [10 minutes]
11. Admin Report: Hearing Examiner Rules - Mike Cocuielly [20 minutes]
12. Admin Report: MLS Licensing Agreement - Chris Bainbridge
13. Infa Only: Stimulus Phase 2-Neil Kersten [*estimated meeting: 125 minutes]
AQril 21, 2009: NO NtEETING Council Attends NLC Green Cities Conference, Portland, Oregon April l 5-22
April 28. 20119 ltegular NItg). G:UII n.m. CF,N7'ERPLACF.. 2426 N 1)iscoveii- Ild (clue date Mon, April 201
a. PtMLIC 1IEARING: SARC' - Scott Kuhta [90 minutes]
2. Consent Agenda: Payroll, Claims, Minutes; N1LS Licensiug Agreement [5 minutes]
3. SARP Discussion - Council [30 minutes]
4. 1nfi) Only: Department Reports [*estimated meeting: 125 minutes]
Draft Advance Agenda 3/26/2009 10:41:50 AM Page 1 of 3
_ 1
May 5, 2009, Studv Session, 6:00 p.m. [due date Monday, Apri127]
1. Sewer Rates Presentation - Bruce Rawls (30 minutes)
2. Cabie Franchise Update - Morgan Koudelka (15 minutes)
3. Council External Committee Reports - Councilmembers (10 minutes)
4. Discussion - Scott Kuhta (30 minutes)
5. Proposed 2010-2015 TIP - Steve Worley (15 minutes)
6. Ordinance Modifying SVMC 9.10 (towing) - Cary Driskell (20 minutes)
Atlocation of Space at Valley Precinct Building - Morgan Koudelka (15 minutes)
8. Council lliscussion: Agenda Items for June 3 County/Council Joint Mtg - Mayor Munson (10 minutes)
[Total Meeting: 145 minutes]
Mav 12, 2009, Regular Meeting,, 6:00 Q.m. [due date Monday, May 4]
1. PUBLIC HEARING: Cable Franchise - Morgan Koudelka [15 minutes]
2. Consent Agenda: Payroll, Claims, Minutes [5 minutes]
3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance, Batch Code Amendments - Christina Janssen [ 15 minutes]
4. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance Amending Comp Plan - Mike Basinger [15 minutes]
5. Motion Consideration: Sprague Ave Resurfacing-Phase I Bid- Neil Kersten [10 minutes]
6. Motion Consideration: McDonald & Evergree❑ PCC Intersections Bid - Neil Kersten [5 minutes]
[*estimated meeting: 65 minutes]
Mav 19, 2009, Studv Session, 6:00 p.m. [due date Monday, May 11 ]
1. Solid Waste System - Deputy Mayor Denenny/Councilmember Schimmels (20 minutes)
2. Community Survey Resulis - Mike Jacl:son (15 minutes)
[Total Meeting: minutes]
Mav 26, 2009. Regular Meeting, 6:00 Q.m. [due date Monday, May 181
1. PITIiLIC IIEARING: 2010 - 2015 TIP - Steve Worley [20 minutes]
2. Consent Agenda: Payroll, Claims, Minutes [5 minutes]
3. First Readiog Proposed Ordinance to Amend Com Plan (:SA}:Y I3oo(; f)- Mike Connelly [20 minutes]
4. First Reading Proposed Ordinance Amend UD , ubai-ea Plan & Ni` Scott Kuhta [30 min]
5. First Reading Proposed Franchise Ordinance, Cable - Morgan Koudelka [10 minutes]
6. First Reading Proposed Ordinance 09-005 False Alarm - Rick VanLeuven [10 minutes]
7. Info Only: Deparhnent Reports [*estimated meeting: 95 minutesl
June 2, 2009, Stuciv Session, 6:00 p.m. [clue clate Monday, May 261
1. Area Legislators Update - Mayor Munson (45 minutes)
2. Council Eaternal Committee Reports - Councilmembers (10 minutes)
3. Street Standards - Gloria Mant7/John Hohman (20 minutes)
[Total Meeting: 75 minutes]
ConTr»red: f•Ved, Jccae 3, 2009; 1:30 - 4:30 Spokajie Vnllev Council CliQmbers: Joint CounciUCountv Meetinp,
June 9, 2009, Regular Meetin~,, 6:00 p.m. (duc date Monday, June 1]
1. Consent Agenda: Payroll, Clauns, Minutes [5 minutes]
2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance to Amend Comp Plan (SARP I306k l)- N1 ike Connelly [ 15 minutes]
3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance to Aniend UDC/Adopt Subarea I'laii & oap (B~ - S Kuhta [30 min]
4. Second Reading Proposed Franchise Ordinance, Cable - Morgan Kuuciell:a [5 minutes]
5. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 09-005 False Alarm - Rick VanLeuven [10 minutes]
6. Proposed Resolution Adopting City Actions - Mike Connelly [20 minutes]
7. Proposed Resolution Adopting 2010-2015 TIP - Steve Worley [10 minutes]
[*estimated meeting: 95 minutes]
Draft Advancc Agenda 3'26/2009 10:41:50 Ahi Page 2 of 3
~
June 16,2009. Studv Session, 6:00 p.ni. (ciue date ttilunclay, Juiie riJ
1. Surplus Items - Ken Thompson (20 minutes )
2. Residential Lighting - Kath_y McClung (20 minutes )
I'r'orai 1tcc=tin2.: 4n rninutL'SJ
Saturdav, JUUl ?(l, 2009: Cuuncilrtitaff Suiiiiucr IZcty-cat 9:00 - 3:00 (cluc clatc \1 ecl, JtinC l 1]
Tentative Topics: frrranciul forecast; rP1•iew 2009 Cormcil gonls; proposecl 2010 Coimcil gonls, Go»:,:, .
Update/UGA/JPA; Brainstorming
June 23, 2009, No Meeting.Coun;il attends A\VC C:oiiTerence June 23-26 i►i Spol.am:
June 30, 2009. Special Regular Meeting 6:00 p.m. [due date Nluiiduy, Juue ll J
l. Consent Agenda: Payroll, Claims, Minutes [5 minutes]
2. First Reading Proposed Ordinaiice Adopting Street Standards - Gioria Mantz/John Hohman [20 minutes]
3. First Reading Proposed Ordinance Amending Title 24 - Lori Barlow [20 minutes]
4. Motion Consideration: Broadway Rehab Phase 2 Bid Award - Neil Kersten [5 minutes]
5. Info Only: Department Reports [*esdmated meeting: minutes]
Julv 7 2009, Studv Session, 6:00 p.m. [due date Monday, June 291
1. Council External Committee Reports - Councilmembets
Julv 14, 2009, Regular Meeting,. 6:00 p.m. [dae date Monday, July 6]
1. Consent Agenda: Payroll, Claims, Minutes [5 minutes]
2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance Adopting Street Standards - Gloria MantrJJohn Hohman [ 15 minutes]
3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance Amending Title 24 - Lori Barlow [15 minutes]
[*estimated meeting: minutes]
Julv 21, 2009, Studv Session, 6:00 p.rn. [due date Monday, July 131
1. Council External Committee Reports - Councitmembers
Julv 28, 2009, Regular Meeting 6:00 p.m. [due date Monday, July 201
1. Consent Agenda: Payroll, Claims, Minutes [5 minutes]
2. Info On]y: Departilieiit Reports ~
OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS:
Accessory DNvelling Units (modify Ord 08-006) 7/09 Overweight/over size vehicle ordinance (2009) ,
Budget Calendar for 2010 Budget Panhandling Ordinance
City Center Report to Council Rite Aid Proposal - Inga Note
City I-iall Sales Purchase Agreement Roads: Winter Weather Assessment - Neil Kerste:
Comp Plan Qrtriy Update (July, Oct, Jan, April) Strategic Transp. Financial Plan - Dave Mercier
Goncurrency Transnortation Benefit Dist (2009) a. Establish ord.;
Contracts - 7-year renewals (pros/cons) (b) set public hearing; (c) draft resolution; (d) bnllnt
Court Services Alternative Analysis la»guage
Discovery Playground Bid Award (June?) Transportation Lnpacts
East Gateway Monument Structure # Use Agreement (Car\ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ! ► ~
Governance Manual Water rights
lmpact Fee Request Central Valley School District Western Dance Hall
1 T S p e c i a l i s t C l a s s i f i c a t i o n R e s o l u t i o n = Awaitin g action b y others;
Joint Mtg w/City of Spokane Council (possible lopics: doesn't allow for time for public comrnents]
tivaste water challenges; rnu»icipal court challenges;
regional transportation planning/solutions; GMA policies
& implementalion)
Lvdging Tax
NoRheast Housing Solutions City Membership #
Draft Advance Agenda 3/2612009 10:41:50 AM Page 3 of 3
1
~
J
S706koane 00
~~;U- i~ 1~ C;11:1:C :i~. 5llilc ILIt~ ~:~~',ii.;l;C 1 d~i,: .
509.921.1040 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall @spokanevalle;.o: _
lev
- - - __s o
Memorandum
To: David Mercier, City Ntanagc;r aiid C:ity COu,IC i 1
From: Michael Basinger, AICP, Senior Planncr
Cc: Mike Jackson, DcPutVC'it-y M111aaet'
Date: April l, 200c)
Re: CPA-05-09 }'uhlici'Ouasi-Public :lina1N5is
As part of the 2009 Comprehensive Plan Amendments, the Planning C;ommission is recommending
removing the Public/Quasi-Public designation from the comprehensive plan map and text. Several
issues have arisen relating to this designation. One issue relates to the uses allowed in the
implementing zoning classification (Community Faeilities), where the uses permitted are limited to
community facility type applications such as a church or fire station. This has created a hardship for
properly owners wishing to sell their property that is no longer being utilized for a Community
Facility. In most circumstances, this situation results in a loss of value for the property owner. Lastly.
staff has had difficulties maintaining the designation considering many P/Q-P properties, particularl~
churches, relocate, or open new facilities creating map maintenance issues. As mentioned in the
review session, removing the designation from the land use map will not affect a Communit`
Facilities ability to locate in the City of Spokane Valley considering the adopted Schedule o1`
Permitted Uses (Appendix 19-A) ctirrentlv permits Community Facilitics in all the zonini-,
classifications.
The attached matrix identities tlie I'lanning Commission's recomrnendation on the NublicrQua~7-
Public amendments. The recommended Comprehensive Plan designation and the subsequent zonin`~
classification are organized by section with a unique ID that correlates to the attached maps. Due to
the quantity of land use designation changes staff is proposing that City Council review the Plannin2
Commission's recommendation prior to the first reading. At the first reading, our intention is tc>
summarize the information presented to Council at the study session and only review land usc
designation changes where Council has questions or concerns. Piease feel free to cnntact me if yoti
WnNr cIuC-StiO115 when reviewing thc suprlemental packet.
68S-00-4-~ c,r iiiha5ingc:r;~i sI);_1l:~tn~~,iill(~`.~,r,~
Attachments: Puhlic/Quasi-I'uNic CIctii,-:i:ilitill CIl<<zi`~c; lnd associatcc! 111.1],
Public/Quasi-Public Analysis
Section'No._ CP Desi nation Subse uent Zonin
WS-1 Law Density Residential SF Residential District (R-3)
WS-2 Low Density Residential ISF Residential Urban District (R-4)
WS-3 Medium Density Residential IMultifamily Medium Density Residential District (MF-1)
WS-4 High Density Residential IMultifamily High Density Residential District (MF-2)
WS-5 Community Commercial Community Commercial District (C)
WS-6 Regional Commercial Regional Commercial (RC)
WS-7 Parks and Open Space Parks and Open Space (P/OS)
Section No. CP Desi nation Subse uent Zonin ~
WN-1 Heavy Industrial Heavy Industrial (I-2)
WN-2 lRegional Commercial I Reqional Commercial (RC)
WN-3 iLow Density Residential ISF Residential District SR-3)
WN-4 I Low Density Residential ISF Residential Urban District (R-4)
WN-5 lOffice I Office (O)
WN-8 lOffice I Garden Office (GO )
IIVN-7 ~Light Industrial ILight Industrial (I-1)
WN-8 ~Low Density Residential ISF Residential Suburban District (R-2)
WN-9 ~Parks and Open Space I Parks and Open Space (P/OS)
Sect~o -t~g~t.
WCS-1 Low Density Residential SF Residential Estate District (R-1)
WCS-2 ~ Low Density Residential SF Residential Suburban District (R-2)
WCS-3 ~Low Density Residential ISF Residential District (R-3)
WCS-4 Community Commercial ICommunity Commercial District (C)
WCS-5 Neighborhood Commercial iNeighborhood Commercial (NC)
WCS-6 ~ Parfcs and Open Space IParks and Open Space (P10S)
Section~ _N_o: ; : CP•Desi nation Subse querit Zonin
WC-1 Low Density Residential SF Residential Suburban District (R-2)
WC-2 Low Density Residential (SF Residential District SR-3)
WC-3 Corridor Mixed Use IComdor Mixed Use (CMU)
WC-4 High Density Residential I Multifamily High Density Residential District (MF-2)
Section Na. CP Desi nation Subse uent Zonin ~
'JVCN-1 Ccrridor Mixeci Use Corridor Mixcd Usc (CIL1U)
WCN-2 Med+um Density Residential IMultifamily Medium Density Residential District (MF-1)
WCN-3 Office I Office (0)
WCN-4 Community Commercial ICommunity Commercial District (C)
WCN-5 Light Industrial iLight Industrial (I-1)
WCN-6 High Density Residential IMultifamily High Density Residential District (MF-2)
WCN-7 Low Densi~Residential ISF Residential District (R-3)
WCN-8 Mixed Use enter IMixed Use Center District (MUC)
WCN-9 Parks and Open Space lParks and Open Space (P/OS)
1 of 2
J
Public/Quasi-Public Analysis
Secti7 CP.DesignatY ~uti`sequentZoning . .
ECN-1 Mixed Use Center Mixed Use Center District (MUC)
ECN-2 High Density Residential Multifamily Hiqh Density Residential District (MF-2)
ECN-3 Parks and Open Space Parlcs and Open Space (P/OS)
ECN-4 lHeavy Industrial IHeavy Industrial (I-2)
ECN-5 ILow Density Residential ISF Residential District (R-3)
ECN-6 ILow Density Residential ISF Residential Urban District (R-4)
Section No. CP Designation ~Subse uent Zoninq-~`' "
EC-1 Carridor Mixed Use Corridor Mixed Use (CMU)
EC-2 Office ~ Garden Office (GO)
EC-3 High Density Residential IMuitifamily High Density Residential District (MF-2)
EC-4 Low Density Residential ISF Residential District (R-3)
EG5 lOffice ~Office (O)
EC-6 I Regional Commercial ~ Regional Commercial (RC)
Section No. CP Desi nation Subse uent Zo.'~1 ~
ECS-1 Lo,.v Dersity Residential SF Residential Suburban District (R-2 )
ECS-2 I Parks and Open Space (Parks and Open Space (P/OS)
ECS-3 Low Density Residential ISF Residential District (R-3)
ECS-4 High Density Residential IMultifamity Hi~h Density Residential District (MF-2)
ECS-5 lCorridor Mixed Use ICorridor Mixe Use (CMU)
ECS-6 IMedium Density Residential ~ Multifamily Medium Density Residential District (MF-1)
,
ES-1 lLow Density Residential ISF Residential Suburban District (R-2)
ES-2 ILow Density Residential ISF Residential Urban District (R-4)
ES-3 I Low Density Residential ISF Residential Estate District (R-1)
ES-4 (Low Density Residential ISF Residential District (R-3)
ES-5 ICommuniry Commercial ICommunity Commercial District (C)
ES-6 ~ Medium Density Residerrtial I Muttifamity Medium Density Residential District (MF-1)
ES-7 ~Corridor Mixed Use 'Corridor Mixed Use (CMU)
ES-8 lOffice lGarden Office (GO)
Section = _ CP_-, Bjffn~~~ Siibs~ uent •2otiing EN-1 Parks and Open Space Parks and Open Space (PIOS)
EN-2 lMedium Density Residential lMultifamily Medium Density Residential District (MF-1)
EN-3 lLow Density Residential ISF Residential District (R-3)
EN-4 (Low Density Residential ISF Residential Urban District (R-4)
EN-5 IHeavy Industrial iHeavy Industrial (I-2)
EN-6 ILight Industrial ILight Industrial (I-1)
2 of 2
.
a
Toper
s
. ago
S
~a Y r
IP
orth
, at
~1 -
st Ce
\
I
LlS~ dp,ncr~r+a r
• P,O,p g'ci°" .
~
ry~ +
~ - _ entt~► t, ,
.
,
r t f.
vF ~
es
. ~
, -t
i
a
r
;
r~► ~ ~ ~ ~ S
e th
~
, .t
~
M
~
y ~
~ x
~
~
~
r
_ nc~{
I l.'
D~~Y~ , ~
val~ey ~ Yal eyw~y Vaileyrv$ ,
_.1~L~49.lL
J ~ arri t n ~ - -
,
d _
~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~~~r ~~r~ uui ~i~ ~~~~rw~ ~
Oa411~~~t11 lt11~11t1 li~ll IMW M1111~~11 1 ~1ii~ih~ r~a~~~ r~~r~~ee~~ i~~t~ r~a~~ _ . 4. ,~tililt • ~a
~ ~ , ~ _ _ ; '+1stl _ ■ . ~x__ _ .1_ . _ _ . _ . ~ 0
• o r' - ~ ~ 1 t w ~ ~1,. ~ ~ 1~,p 2~d - - - o~ ..~~!d . . - - w'e ■ ~ _ ~ , - -y - _ J 11
■ ~ ~r, - - - • ~i. " ~ '
~ 3f~ . ~r'.,y.' ~ ~ ~ C R ; . s5o . R ~~Nti D ~ ~Qwz , ~ , !o . ~ ~
■ . ~ - _ a - - _ _ . _ , ,w . . ~ - . ~~~~1' ~4~ m
~ u , , ~r"'11111 f" ~ 5th _ 5th ~
■ ~ c . L ~ I I I . ~
~t Lle ~ 6 - • n Gra ~ 1 ~ ~ 1!lIIM
P ~ ~ . - - Le end 9 ~ ~ ~ ~
i ~ ~ t ! i 1~ ~ --~th - - P -~tl 1
- - ~ • _ , WSPQP . o 0 ■ _ . , ~ i r 'tY
■ - - _ - - PQP1D . 7. ~
~ ' .1Q~h,~ ~ 1 'n - '1 ■ o WS ~ ~ ♦
■ ~ ~ ~ ~o , 11 th. • YVS-2
• ~ ~ i I ~
11 ! ~ ~ ~11111111111111111 11
■ ~ . ~ m ~ ■ ~ WS-0
~ - m,~ - M I ~ i ~~l .t ■ ~ ~ WS-5 '14~h ~ ~ f
. r _ ~ '1111 , y 111 M yyg.s 0~ w ~
_ ~ r .r ~ ~ ~ / ~
■ d ~ 1 WS-7 ~ _ 16__ 1 tll f#itfllllllll ~
. • ~ ■ . r sy ■
. ~s 1~ ■ .
. ~ ~ ~ 11111 ■
b ♦ r g I
■ ■ ~ ■ .
11111111111~111111 ` ' ' . ~
. h ~
_ / ~ / F~IrarTQUnds .s - ; 6
o, ~ - _ . _ - !ki x - 1~i/ ,r' x
A ~ x _.~iht~ r , -
aNe a . ; ,
~ ~ Valle a ~ - - Yw x ; ~ _ N~xon t ' F' -
` = _ ~ - ~ Maln Wa_~rin t - - , _ 1 1n
_ , ~ - - m ~ - _ _ , e
~ - ~tlverside . ~ - ' ' - , _ ~ ~
~ - - ~a . ~
~I~ItA~111t1 iQgo-o»~~att ~ ~~Y4r ~ee~~~ ~ - _ ~ rs~~'~ „ r~r~etti, ~ rt~~r~r~i ~ t~et~ C ~r - - ■ , ~ , ~ ~ _ ,
■ ~~t a - ~ , ! - ~ i 4st ! i~ ■ c ~ - - - - ;
. ~ ~ a WS-5 ~ ~q ~ 2 _ - ~ 9- _~~1d ~ I4 !~~t, . , _ ~
- ~ : F-: r' _ - ' ~ " . ~ I ~ ' • C " 'r p - - - WS•6 - ~d . . ~ s o . - I 0~ ~r , - . ~ _ _.~r. i~~0 - -i. ! •
. - MF_2- _3rd ❑ ~ . . , ~i _ W2~5 0~ -s _ ~ - - - ~ RC r e~- _ - '1 ~
_ - - 1 I - ;---:4th' :;~cr-.,. ~ '4~~~" - ~ - - - L L . -1 - - 4_tt~ 1 ~ , 411111r
■ ~th I • . ~ " ; .~Illlr
■ ~ o _ 5~ _ ' . ~ 0 ~ WS-7 _sth ~ ~ _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ stn Le end
~ , - 6 t 9 ~ ~ti - PIOS . . P4~ c►
- t'~' w ~ ti ■ ~ ; _ _ _ ~ 11111 Od - - o wsPwP . ~ ~ .
~t i , ~ $~h ~ ~ ` ; . ~ _ , _ m _ e h ~ PQPID
■ n - a~ 0 - , • WS-3 . E ~h ~a _ w ~
~ ~ h L WS-1 . . WS-2 = MF=1 ~ ~ - . WS-1 'L
. _ . - 3 ~ ~ _ ws-2 ~ 7 . _ R-4
_ R-3 . . _ . . = - _ • - WS-3
~ ~ ~ • . 1 -
11 1 ~ IIVS-4 ■ 1 1111111111111111111 ■ ~
~ - ' ~ WS-5
~ _14th ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ri - ~ ~ ~ • ~ , a. • : WS-6
L a~ ~ - Il~r ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ " ■ ;
UYS-7 . o~ - ~ _ ~ ~ ti ~~s f~ 1 f t 1111111111 . ~J~t
V ~ f ~ . A ~
C ~y ■ ~ i 0 ~ • 1.~1 ~
■ ~ ■ ~
111111 ■ . ♦ r
~ . I~ . _ ~ ~
tt IIIIIIIIIIIIf111111 1~ •
. r e~ h 7
to
/
•
aLsiAg .
/
1
~
c
41 ~ •r
• .r''
• ~
~
Leend
, uc
* ~
GtP . +
Q
n - c M_
P1D lie _
VYhI c r . ~
1 , M u
wwr~•2 ~ C - r
• Id ! ~
r _ ~
WN'6 • ~ ' ~~1' ~
A. . - • ~
,I
,inta + .
dNty ~ _
WN ~
s ori ~ - " ~ta o
i
M
j~ gt ir N
u c
1, . ~
, ~ " . G ~
, .S~ a► p
ti et ~ 3 _
a~ J Q~m .
PIOS
fl a~ dy ra
1~ - ~r ; % r g ,
c - ~
. ~ ~
N .
ti
{ Va „
~Qa e n
~ Q(•Wd p..
n > 1/~~
• txp g i Me~~ ls
( ~A r
~ ~ ~ ~
■ Le end i - g a
. ~~~M D n
. .yyN m ~
c~ _ _ ~ ~ WN•8 TPZ 6 ' ~ g,
~ ~r ~'f ~ • k R ~2 r
WNPQP alrY _
~ PQPID -
wN-1 : - - ucice
/ _~r~e WN-2 ~ ; ~ ~ ~s
~ ■ ~ti ~ S 11 ~
1~~ ~ , 4YN-3 . _ , . ~ ~ .
- . , WN-4 t~ . ~ ~ ~bont ome . ~ 9
.~i N ~ ~ ~ 'r- AMS'~ I1S~1 ~ c ld , \ - ■ WN-5 ,
. y ~ . FIOX . = L 3 ~ Ifl ~ - ~ ~
UVN-6 c~ _ . - ~ ~ " 'o :~I - 1 sh n
~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ `i a~• ' a ~ ~ ~ WN-7 ~ ~ ~ , i _ichfe ~i~n~~. c~ _ ?ren = - na ~ ~ :
- d1~. - - ~ - - i 0 ~ - ~ ~'~I 4 ~ ~ g ~ 9 WN-8 ; ~ . . a ! e~ - -
wN 7 _ o Q ~ ` e . :I:. ~ _ 2.
. N i WN-9 . ~1ora_ - - - I-1 , - - - , • _ - _ _ -
Augu~ - - : ~ f ~ ~ . - ; r, ~ ~ ,
_Nli_ssion : ~ a~ - - , - . - I - x- - 1~~' ! f/ G C ~
tL . ` C 1~~ . ' I ~0 d ~ >>I ~ , i O ~ t1 _ . ~ ~ - , ~
- ; r~ ; ~s I o ~ ~ ~ C . A - _~I~l
1~~ ~ ~ ~ s m ~ - ~ 1~ - - _ ~ _ ~S L ~ e~ 1~t ~ - Shar ~ a.; , , . r T - _p . .
m e~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rs ~ , ; _ ~ Boo ~o Y ..i~;.
~ , . ; , ~1 s. \ N ~ , - ~ W i _ , , . , ~ ,Desmet . ~ _ De t WN-5 o w ~ p•,r_~_ ~
~ t~ 01 • - 'R~ iA . Ca~ai a , ti~ t Ido . L ~ . _ ~ , ~ Ca a Q- . -
WN-1 t o..:.~ - WN.9- ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ 7Dean ~ 9, ` w . ~a _ i ~ ~ ` ~
~ : ~-2 Broadwa E ~ Mallon 2$6.-,,;; P~QS a ~ _ , _ _y - - ~ W-~ ~ _ ~ -
f _ = B og i . I _ dwa , / . cn , ,;.t.,,_ . ~ ~ , WN 3 _ -
SQi~n i id ~ ~ " ~ W - ~ ~ ~ F _ 9 ~ ~ - _ .~c _ R 3 i
~ - - - - ~ ~ ry - ~~k _ WN 2 i - - A ~ ~
, ~ N=6 ~ w Y RC _ ~ i ; ,
, ~ , a -y'"'ay - .,s;~~= - iie _ ~r ~ ~a GO ~ ~ o,~ ~-~li o - j~ , o~,,xn, lxo
~ ~ , _ . _ , . . ~ Me(n _ _ W,
_ NLai , ; R~versl e ~a4 ---9t .
. ~ 2 _ _ ~ w i ~ , ~ « r ' ~ - $
~~or t»~ ~~t~~ ~t~~Y4 f~~i~~~~~~~~r ~~tr~ ~rr ~ ~ - - ~ ~ r~r~~i~~ ~e~~e~~~ ~te~ett~rr r~~~~~:#~~iaa~a~ ~ ,
~ Z
~ ~e 1
a
♦ C
I ~
♦ z - ~ ~g
♦
♦ ~
I*
end
u
1.eg .
1
CSPQ;P
YV r
~
~
pQpID - ~ _
~,{c~- _l 1
Lore
`
s-3 r , . ~ -S►'
w~ ,
~
~ -
WcSA
~
, Wcs-5 ag
- c
~
wcs-6 .
~ CS- 1
- .1
C a
~r
~
,qffi , _
a ~ y
f~i►t / t
~
~
' •
~
~
~
~ NC
4t .
~
♦
♦
~
- ~ az
al soutti
.
th
4~ ~
~ y.
l
~ ~~a I. ..r 1 ~ nR
~t1 ~ - ~ ~ 27.tk~
~ ~ ~
~ ~~r~ ~t ~ ~
! Z ~ `G
~1~ ~ ,
~r~~r _ x .
~ a -
~ a S~ - 29th
■ r~, .
~ `~r-... !e _ c
~ ~
♦ ►,l ~
~ ~ ~ - - ~ Q
~ o ~
~ . _ ~ ~
~i ' a s t~d _
~ 1 32
~ , t ~
S`" '
C
z _ _
_ • C
_
~ ~
; ,~;y, -
r~~~ .
~r~~~~ el~s
r►
. _
■ _ ~
• 1 flh9 ~
d
e en ~ .
L d
~ ~ 6 ~ c
•-V ~ ~ ~
1 ~ S -
- ~ -
` ~.C ~ ~
QP • \ . p
SP
WC ~
.
0
r
, p ~ ~
.a ~
p`p ~ ~ .1
P~4 .J l
a a _ AOth__
1 •
1NCS- ~ ~s a~
1. - ~ '
S-2 Q
C , S
w C
wac
'A 44
S-3 ~c a . 4 -3
4 R
wc o S
~ C
~ ~
s-4 ~ _ ; .
WC ~ C
~ .t,`-~ .
1 , ~
,
. I
CS-5 , ,
W I _ o
~ . - V „
- ~
~ 0 ,t.
GS-6
w % ra ~
~ iti, ~ . . -
~d fi 9 S
, C
~ 4- 4 4 ~ c
• ~ ~ ~
1~ ~ , m rd
, ~ Z
~ ~ ~
, i . N~ _
I ~4F +n y
~
rr+ ; „r ,
. ~ ~
~ ~A , ifiti~ t - ~~r ,
: ~ ; ~ •
■ ~ , l//~ ~ tJ ~
~ C C r
r i/!~, 0 to l3 ~
~ ~V '1 r }
rf - ,
r
. , ~ -
r ~ ~;l'
.
~ ~ ~
r ,
. ; ~ t
■ L h - ~r;, ~
a
■ r
a ~
- t~
w ~
~ ~~r ~ ~
~.H_lt~ m
t~ ~ , ~ 1
t~ ~ . ~
\
~~1 w , ~~S
~ ~1~~ t!~
~ r ' j~
r!~%~/;/~~f ~ 50
• ``-~~~~_1, ' _
~ , ~
i~ ~ ~ c
-1
r ~7
_ C
, . -
'l~~i ~ .
1
- ~
, ~
~ , ~
1 111 1111 11 111ttt1 111 4
~ ~~i6 ~ • 0 • ♦
. ~ • ♦ ~
~ ~ _ . , , ~ t-~
p~ ■ P~Zt •
~ ~ ; • £'JM ~ 3' , _ ~ a , ~ ~~~x ;
_ t~ ~ Z~M " 8 I
~ ~dt ~ t-~M
♦ ~Z I ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~IdDd
• ~ d ~ bd~M
s _ • . , , .
~t . uaGa ~ P ~ .
U~I~ _ ~ ; , ~1 ♦
/ . , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 111 , `
` .
~ ~ ~a ua s - l ~3 M i _ . ~ - ' ` ' ■ ~ist d u
, . .
- ♦ , ~ ~ A ~ ~ 41~ 1b L . I~
~ ♦ ~tb11 I ~ ~ ~ ~
~ < t ~ ~c z •
~ ~ y ~ ~ ( ~ : i. ~i `
~ ~ ~ , , , ~ • M p _ ~ D •
. g, y~, i
M W 1 4 1 w._. I I _ _ , _ _ ~
* ~ ) ~ ~u • IN ♦
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ey~~d a, . v~ , ~ 11l11~.
- 4~~ ~ ~ ~ ~i$~ ■ ~ ■
a ~ ~ • 4~t .
~1 , q~ . - D ~~H " ~
~ , T - 1_ ` ~ , 9 ~ 4~9 ~ I b-~M t
( ~ ~ ~ ♦
'S ~ 1,~ ~ ► y 4 _ ■ ° .
, ~ . _ _ . _ - - . ~ -y1~ - ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~='.\V~~~ ~ ,
. f1W~ -r,~ ~ , ~ ~ ~
- _ w ~ ~ P~ ~~M , a . ~ 1 I _ ~ j ,
~~~~~~~ri~~~i~~~~~~~~~ i~~~ii~~~~~~~~~ri~~~~~~~i~~~ ~t~ r~ ~~f~t~~~~ ~~~~~~i~~~~~~ ~ ~
i 'I
t~f~-~ 1 A l 111111111111~ 1IIIIIIIIAl111 111111 1 1111 ~ ~ ..1,.1111111M~~1~111111 ~1~ NI 1 11~ III111I~A1 „ , ! - .4 ~ ; ~q
_ . I ~ . ' ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ - , _ 3~a wc-~ - ~f~_ i
~ ~ ~ u.> ~ oo i \`ti . CMU ~ . ~
~ ~ ~ . 4th ~ _ 4tfi - ti : . . - - - - - - - .~c - f ~r 3 ~
~ o • . I 5th ~ , ~ I
~ ~ ~ ; ~ , ~ ~ ► ~ .
~ WC- ~ th ~ ` ~ sth - - ~ . - th_ ;
w ~ ` ~ MF-2 T~. - ~ c - .~r W ~ T ~
~ \ 1 7th t d ~ - _ r _ r , ~ -
r ~ ~ _ ~~1 . 8ih ~ _ - - - _ - -
■rir~r~c . r - ~ - ; , ~ . + ~ prche 3 I • -
~ . _ ~ L ~ Nlni - ~
~ 9th • ' _ 10t
• - - _ - -1-=-~. ~ I ~ a -
- - - ~ m ; a ■ : + • ' a 1~t ~ • a6 - - - . _ . C p ~t ~
~1 - ' ~ ~
~ 2th _ _ - - ~ • ~ ~ 1 0p - .r
"V` L ~ . . : ' iM . . ~ ~ : ~ > 1
,n 3 ♦ ~ ~ _Ir ~ ~ . ♦ ~ o ~ / a
~j ' 4t : ~ _ 14~h I ~ ° I ~ 'b
-
■ ~ ~ Le end , 9 • . - - W st Centra
. WCP P ~ 1 h - - Q
~ 111 , - . 1 , . ~ , P PID • Q ~ ~
♦ t7th - , _ ♦ - 11th ~
wc.~ ♦ + ~ ~ • -
WG2 I _ _ ♦ ~ ~ S'
♦ wc~ •
: n~ wc-a •
i
i I g - - ~ ~ ~i G+
~ Z1~~. • 4 • ■
♦ , ~d ■
~ - ~ • . ~ i
23r~ . 13td ~ ~ i
i ~ 4~b-- I -
ill 1111111 f111 111 1 .
%
~ ~'`o' T
~e end - - u
9 ~ „ o w II
~o ~ ~ . _ _--T~ ; , wcNPCaP . . ~ ~ m 4 Lac M~ ; '~t " t _ .
~ ~ a m PID - 'G PQ ~ ~ ~ • ~
WCN-1 ~ n - • ~
i ` Spu ~ _ WCN-2 ~n , th
R~~ 1# ~ . ?ry,a ~,1 n
wc►~ Y 1~~ 1~ I 1 4 s~~ 1~~ ~
- WCN-~ _ ~-~A~ r h ~
r ~ ~ • L a W 'U+I-sJ 1~ N ~ ' , 0 a~ ~ •
~ ,r•'~ p~+d • 11~...- ~ - • ~.f a ~
WCtJ-0 ' , }t-1 F -
~ ~ wcH•~ - S~a ~ , ~ ~ _ ucke
- ari ; WCN~B Ck $ ~ ~ + ~-~1 • T _ _ ~
\ ~ i~ ,y--, wcN•s ~ _ _ _ ._.~J aJb .
~ ~ ~ ^ 2r ia , ~ - r ao ~ \ I fe _ . - ~ ■ ~ ' ~ ~i a . _ .
r' ~ ~ i . ~ _ ~'/p a. - . ~ ~ ~ z- 5t i".W ~ ' C ' ` ~ y~
~ M Id ■ _ _--.L'~ _ ansiield _ ~E . - -___M - o- x ~c _ . _ __KnQx__ ,
_ 1t h ~ ~ . . nno~ ~ndiana _ , - 'm S = r . _ :
~ (~1 - i i ~ _ ~ j-- a ~ ~ dla g0 _Y~ - 4 9 9p . p ~ - - $ • ~ ~ _ - ~ 9 . 0,~~ 2 _ _ Pl_ , _
- : ~F ~ ~wfn ~ _ ~87~4 _ 0 I ~y - I t`~i - - - - =-..F - - . ~ - ~ - ~ - . 'r. No~ , _ ~~Z~ _ - . 1.9~
_ - u u~~a- bf . u u = - _ _9--. :~~s . s - ; _ o
; , ~ Mis_~I _n___ . s ~ Mis - ~ - ~ - ; - - ~ ' _ Qll o ,
l. ~ - I - , r: ~ r-T ` _ (nt clo~y_ t ~ .y - ,
~ 4 ~ ~ . ; ~ .Y- ~ ~ c p ,h~!. a 8oon -
~ o e - - . _ m > - ~ e esmet ~ ~ ~ D et o ~
~ I . N a 3 I _ _ y E
I all E . j ~ ~ ,i
~ -a fl ~ S fi ~
~ ~ T ~ ~ ~
> ~ . 1 a II
14 ~ _ c _ ~ - i an H ~ a 3 t , oUk o
_ t m ~ e i i ~ ~ al.._-■_ ~ - . ,'~Re SPe ~ - _ m c _
~ !ig M ~ . _ Rl~,r.s~de ; w ~ . ~ . . ~
~ - ■ , ~ _ _ ' a _ ~~Sl~. ~ ~ . _ . . _ _ Sprag~@ _ _ » _ _ . Y _ . - - , ~ ~ T~' ~ . , ~ U $ - ~ w _-~t _ _ . ~ ~ 1st t
~ ~ 2r~d _ ? ~ ~p ~ ~o - _ PIew~X-,. , ~f~ll 1li1~1E ~ ~ 1 ' rd
3rd . ~'1~f ~ J~ t~ . i - - , t ~ i
1 3 4 W t _ _4 - i I I J
e c
~ ' m
wcN-9 Le end ~ g ,i - ~ ~ ~
~ jQ ,o ~ , c Q kwe . . ~ P ~ ~ ~o, ~ ~ ~ ~ lacc~W, ' ~ `:41 ; d
WCNP P ~ Q ~ Q ~ . ~ - - WCN-8 ; o ~ ~ 1~ w
PQPID ~ + . Q ~ ~ • ~ C1 ' ` ~ ~ `
MUC - .m _ ~1 > WCN 1 / . ~ ~ So ~ ~
uth ~ - t~t , ~ ~ _ - - - , WCN-2 r o N ,
~Ya - 1~~- Y ~ ~ ~ 4S4 w ~ . , r
W '3 1~~ .y" ` " ~ ■~CN-~_A CN ~ : / , ~ - ~i •
. _ ~R.3 WCN-4 ~ ~ : . . ~I WCN l . ~ ~ ~ f ~ . T-t
- r - , ~ R-3 WCN-5 _
e k Fai ew l1 i 1~ -
WCN-6 . - ~ ~ ~11 _ GfBC tid ; r ~,l.t , ~,t,;~,., uck e~ ~
. . , . . f~ ~`~~Z`.~~~ ~ 1NCN-7 ~ _ a ~ k .~t , , `~a~ r~ ~ \i~ . ; : ~ ~ 4~ i
i~" ~`'::'i= ~ I . C ~ - WCN 6 M. _ , : ~ ~ ~.f ~ _ J Ck&oa ~ , WCN$ , ~ . ~~c _ _ ~ ~!b
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~S~e ~ M F -2 , N c ~ ~ , ti • . - i
~ WCN-9 ► i a o m ~ - - - n~~0- e~. ~ - - e ~ O~ i d . ~ • ~ '10~ ' 1 tl!
I~ n~fl l.__ . ~ n~ a _ b t « ' . ~J,~ - - W _r^ '7~ _ - ! - - . r~ OX ~ ` . . ~ ~ I111oX . ■.~~-V . ~ ~ !0 • _ - - . ~ ~
3 n , ~ _ . 1 ~ ~ M sn~rnon dian~ _ _ . ~ In-- - a T WCN=9 ~ _ _ . _ti\~ . . ~ n 9 , . ~ . _ - _
1 ~ { 0_ _ ~ t . _ ~ ~ ~ -~,r. 9~ _ _ •.1,~1~ I } ' jg - _ 9p ~ _ _ _ , _ _ p ~ ~ _ ~ P14S__~~~~~~:~:~ -
- - N - - - -190. ~ Nc~~-~9 - I 0: _ Nfl _ _ ~f . c~ _ Q ~ ~ i _ _ : - a~ Nora : - ; g ~ .-;r. J,, . _ F _ . I9
, _ ~ 8. ~ , . 0 . _ U U~~ . u u _ WCN 4 - 9 • . , . , ; r:a:-: ~~a o . ~ ~ MI si
; ~ _ s19n. , s on _ - N Mi io ~ . ~ . ~ - ~C ~ ~ axi~veii ~ ~ ~ ~ - _
_ w 11 ~ - ~ ~ a ~ ~l~1 ~ L ~ Stn - . . ~ . ~1 _ ~ - ~ ~ ~ t,~ ; ~ ~
, - ~ ~ , I t ; _ . m ~ s p E ~ ha ~ ~ ~a - pb ~bOt18.' , , ~o >
~ - - - . - ~ ~ ~ ti~. 3 .~esmet ~o . ~ Ds et : 2 - ~ _ ; o ~ I ~t~ . = _.c C
~ ata(do_ ~ ata - i . ; .`,~::,,J, „ - N-- ~ q _
~ El allo ~ ~ , I . ~ WCN-2 ~ ►_y
~ ro - s ~ , r ad . ad _ ~IVCI~ 7 ~ , WC N -3 ~ . . . S rinqfleT . S - . MF 1 k
~ - ~ R•3 ~i w 1 - - - - - - - ~ _ Y %f' ~
a ~ ~a ' „ alie ' a ~ - - ~=-Y _ ~ :
Y o - - u. - , , ~ ~ o ~ WCN-4 ~ N~a~„ o m ~
' ~ ' ' ~ ~ r , ~ - I m ~ Ma n A - ea • Mai t . 1 I _ ~ c s WCN 9 - - . . ~ - - ~ ~ -r.. p o :G ~ ~ l a
, _ ~ -9' . n _ _ ~ ~ ~ : ~i We ~ . ~ ~ . ~ ■ ~ c . ~ • a ~ Sf3 ~V ~ PIOS . - _ i m Spra~ue ~ . ~ ~
' _ , - - . , ~ ; ~ . ~ _ m n ~ ~ ^m - U _ ~ ar ~ . ~ f~t ~ WCN 9 - i ~ _ . - _ _ _ _ ~ : ~ s
o ~4 . ~ _ 2~~ p _ ~.d f f pre~ : c. i~~w~ tM t~r f~~-•~ ~ r~~ ~PIOS ,
d 3r - a t - - - - - ~ x - WCN•1 ~ - !'It U L ` ~ ~ ~ ~th_ ~ - - ~ .
5i~_ _ • , 5 h - I • I ~ - , ,
,
- .
11 1.N t ~ ~~~f ■ d 3 A ~e en . 9 . c ~
. , • ~ een ECNPQP r~ ~
s ` ~ ~ ~ ° 0 ~ 4M~.~ t
PQPID . ( ■ o► ~ - East Valle W ~ I yy « a
_ ECN-t ~ ~ - m 5Ch40J ~ m m d
~ B[0# oo a~L d ECN•~ ■ ~ • . ~
il~sley. _ - ! p ~ ECN-3 I ljeroY c ~
a r ~ - ECN-4 ~ ~ ~
■ , ' o ~ ~ ~ 3 ~
ECN• ~ k`~ _ _ ~ r- ♦ r~I > Rlc r-- ~ g «a , ~ ~ ~ .~~L _ _ ~ _ _ _ -
~cN-s ♦ ■ ckwel4. ~ a~ , - I I , f ~ ~ o ~ _ / ♦ ~ ~ ~ - . -
I ~j la ~o ' ~ _ _ _ . - ~ ~p ~ ~ ~ _ - ~ ~ a ro ~e
I • > _ 1~ - ♦ r1 a ~ US I r. _ ~
. ~ ~ ~ ~ . ■ ~ rkQ , ♦ ~ ; ~ - I + : ~ « i
t,m • ' dustri 1 ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~
c~ s z~ ~~g- ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ndust ai
t~4- ! ~ ~ ~ , rk C 4~ - - ---s-
■ , Industri I ~ ~ 1'd+ _ t
. ~ o~- G ! i ark D a t~ . ~ : a ~ a
. - ~ ~ Ind strlal r ~ 3 ~ - ~ a , ~ , o ~~..E ~ c a
■ ~ ~ m ~----1 cli c ~ ■ r . _a : ~ ~p . . r , - i w
~ ~1 * w
_ ~ r eci , , ~ ~ _ , ~ , . ~ PI~(rvie ~ _ ~
F~ _ _ ~ n.~ . _ G = - ,
a _ ; =L...~: _ Gr C e ' v, ~ ~ ■ ~ s -~L~ , ~ _ t ~ ■ ~ - • ~
o Mar~ K F , _ ~ ~ 0 J J Y~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
, ~ ~ I r v. ~ I S ~r - ~i ~ ' ' ' ~ ~ ,
-~U J i ~~,~F.;~ ~ 0 C rtl " ~ s i~~ a ~ _~t~ -
rmi a a f:,. s_~~ ~ c ~c
M ~ ~ ant ~a -~"A Rf 90 l . ~ an - _ - y'.
- - - ~ . - , ~ ~
1nd±a'~-----.., S anncn _ . ~ ■ .
dtan - - - ~ ~ t ~ w 194 I90 0.
1 - ~ ~ : ~ . s~ w , ~ - 290 qN -----.-r- _ ~ - _ - - - , , f_ _ -~-1.
r ~ ■ % a • ~ ! gp ~
ugu ~ ~ - ~ _ _ _ ■ - - . r j ~ Q is io ~ _
i _ .
, D ~ n vQr8
o ~ ~ . , ~ m r
I,~,' ; ; -f~ f ~ ~l/~ ~ %i'; % ~ ' - ~ ei~ ~D z ~ ~ ' ~ -
~ % %/i~ ~ 5~~1~~~ ~ o ~ c~ : , / ~ m ~ - loi ~ m rn rn n+ rn ~ ~
~ i J ~ 1f ~ f J !li,: „ ~IS ~~~ti n n n n n ~,.f/ , ~ 2 2 Z 2 Z Z ~ Q ; ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'T1 ~ ~ ~ ~ J o /r~rf m , ~ , ~ b ~ N
« . ~ ~ ~ a ' ' ' John;on ~ ~
, o - ~ skl~prwr~h ; 0 ~ ~ o ',,,~~ji.~1',~
~ 1f~aOdNVdtt1 ~ O . . r ~ / 'II S . ~ ` ~
oT. c~.;~ 3 ~ ~ ' ~ fe
t \ ! ~ ~`y ~
- ; i-~i ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ Wilb~ur ~ p ; . :-I: ~ ~ f ~ 3~
i ~ - _ '':v~d'~ oX ♦ \ n on ( _ Ga~ - - ~ ,,'o ~'s~ •
3 ~ ♦
` ~ o no ~.au ~ ~ i° 1 ♦ ~
, ~ i ~ % ~ r~- ~s7, ~ ■
~ + /i-f~ ~ .~-f~i i i 1tfH / / 1 ~ ~ I t-H-~~~~'~ ~
~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ rTI ~ --'''0 ` ~
~ ~ ~ ~herry ~
~ ° z---~ ~'1~ , ~~Dc+
~ N Z,, ~ ~ ; ~ N ~~#~1~ 1~~~~~ ~~~~~IIIIIIw►
. ~ VercTer
' C~~' n~ ~ ``vw~ Poo ~ f M ~ •e
, , cow `c r~ Z _ ~ : ~ ' - -
, I ~ „ cDo~al~; i f la i ~
, ~ - ~ - : ~ ~ S as
I~p . ~ ~'i ~ - ~ -
~ - :~~'mu~ _ i. , - , i er ~ _ j- ` ~ ~
, Q Z ~ ~ ~ m
~ ~i~'` ayhew arn~ir:,~; 'o ~ W
_ Av~io~. , . ~ a s
j ~~*g = , - - ~ ~~o Evergreen ~i
c ~ ~ ~n- ~ p ~ ~
~ ° ~";f~/~, ~ ~
~ ~ . ~
I m , Best ~
` a ~ ~ ~ees _ w z
r.*~ I , ~ f ~ ~
M11 rr0 I
'a . f ----vi~1 - i! ms ~ ~
T" ~ ~ ' ~ 9
I-~ ' '-~n~'-~ ~
' ~ i ~f ~ ~ I ~ - t1'I ~ ,i~ res ~ I ~ ~ I ►1 . , m
i:: ' _ ~ n m N Z ~
~ C~
~L' ~ ~ ' met ' Z iQ ~~\~m W i ~ I, .a
~
~ u ~~-~tl~-!1lRIg~~~~I/1 ii-F~i~/~~~1~~~~i~L. ~ , ,'a~~1~ ~ ~
, Plonem ~ ~W ~ ;~us , f~ ~j, . ~ ~ u ~ <
~ - -d i Q~ l8 ~ ustr , ~ r o~
1p+ark 1st tndustrial '~r r M
.P_~rk 2_~d ~ ~ ~'n, -
~ a IndUStrial ~ ~ a ~ ~m . Q ~ - ~ m
. . ~ ~.Park 3 , - -
_ ~ m , ~ I, J G
~m ~ ~ ~ ~LarGh ' a ~0 , - - - "~a or ~
~ Industr~al ~~m a ~ a ~ - ~__pn ~ aI ~ Pa~c 4th ~n N ~ k
a
tnduscrial ~ nnyv e
Park 5th ' ~
1V
. - - pa~ ~ ~ ~
c ~ a' 00 l ll t ~ - I~~tl~lllil
P~£ ~ I IllllillllR~1 . ~ z ~ ~ f1~~~ ~ ~ a tlllll
p 11111i11 - ys~ ■ 1~ ; /~~~/1{ ~ J , . . . ~
y ~ , ~ ' * ~ , , .1`.'~~' ~ ~ m i . ± ~ ,
. , r ~ , ~ . . $~t1
E : . . . , . ` - ; ~ i ~ , _ ~ ~ - e-it b~R1 ~p ~ ; - z~
~ . K I 3~ - i~ ~A ~ ~ ,3, , $~j6 „ enbe~dS o , •
_ : n ■ ~ 1 i _ ~ . ,c I ~ r. , ~ ~ , I ~ U! W ,o s ~
,L;~:;; w ! a A_. ~ ~u: m ti, Q
:ti a -T = igW~- ~ m ~ < a~AA
~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~I~`
5 epl~ x . ~ uo ~N s ~ ~
~ : ; - ~o " ~
`7C~7~1► _ , ~r----
; - o ~~0 _ ~3 ~
r I ° , . _ - 4. - ~ -
. - ~ ~ ~ a I~IY N _ - S _ . _
i~ $ ,
Iall$u . ,g
- ~ eo~ ti ~
-`~11 • I - - r tn
~ ~ _ _ ~ p ~--g-~
; ~p ' ;r PI ~ewseQ ■ c . .
~ ~ - ~ ! . _ J- , c'~ . .
_ m ; . . : ~ ~ 3 - ~ ~ -
~ . . ~ : ~ ~ 3 d d.i ~ ' _ d ~ o e[~ , *
. ~ ae a ~ 4-~3 4 _ m m 3
~~-+a._ ~ ~ ~ _ s ~ ~ s . . s-~ ~ - _ , .
~ s~ . 1 ~r,x ~a tl
~3 r l~,ll~► , - . _ 1~# m ~ . _ _ ~ ~ . _ ; _ _
e-~ Np ~ _ _ - _ - . -~i5~~ - , ~ x ,
~ r~~r, o ~ ' % , z-~ r~ _ C ~ . ~;~'i ~ x~, ; ,
~ r ~ , ,
t-~~ ~ .f~~` . ,:~•.s: ~8 p 11 , ~ . ~ - -.~i;~,:: _ ti w _ ~ 1 . _ ~ ~
r~a ~ N . - 1 a~a ~ f~ _ ~ _ ~k~ ~ r ~ . . . _ .
11 - , ' - - - i M 6 dOd~3 ~t ~ ~ ~r r~~7 a ~ ; ~~~~zµ ~ i~~~w'~tt r e~ . ~ ;
oe i aBa u 1
p
t
~ ' L. ~ c~ c-~ er ►n co ` I ~ _
C~ U U U CS , C ~ ~ W LlJ W W W W ~ _ ~'F
m 0- n- _ - _ .4:., ~ ~nt n - - - - . :
J uvi a # I a~ ii ~ r~ r~~ ~k~s~srr~rrrr ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ ~ , . M _
y~f ' O W ~
~ ~ U _ ~ - 0, i ~ ~ ~~a m a► ' ~
- ~ ~
~ ,+,~~'1►~ ~ ' _ _ ~ ~I v~ . ~ J6(~ S• t ~
~ ~ ~ _ ~ ' . ~ ~ '
■ ~ ~ ~,'i'/!i l/
~ ~/~f / ~ Q T,~ fl r ~ ~ ~ / i' ~ . ~ ~ , I ;
W ' su~n ~ - / ~ris
o s ~ . 1~ ~ ' ;
/ ~ ~/~f~%,-% .r ~ f__ ~ / , . f,~; N ; ~ /~,f~ '
, ~ r~ ~ ~~.f%'r: ' e swepd _ -p
~~■9~y_T~ •~'I ~I ~ ~ ~ ,1 _Q~ u % /
° , , ~ ~
~ -"~"-~ea-- ~ ~l- - ~ ' j N~ ~ - ~
~ ~ m ~ - l,!~ ~ ~ . ' ~ ~ ; , _ ~/~i! j/ I
- V ~.o ~ o - / , ,
v , ~ W " ~ ' ~i ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ .i!~ :
- •r l ~ - If~,-_ euue - uauue W C~
~ r, ~
~ o ~ r ~
o~ o, ~I 1 c ~en o ~I o~ ~ . _ ~ r~ ~ t'~-~ . ~
' ~ Q ~ ~ ~ M ti4;'\.\~~ . . ~
1 ~ , ~ Y/ ~ ~ ~ t1 ~ ~ ~ 1.•~ ; \ ~ . t1Ael~6~ ~ . ~~t~ , . ~ ~ 1 ~ , ~ Y 11.- - - ~ - - ~
~ l, _ - \~\`~~l~~J~'~i .r~' " ~
: ~ ~ . ti~`~\`~\,\~t~\.\~ '1.\~t\ '4*S:t~'c ~ ~ ~ , \ ~ \ (AI ~ ~ J j,,. ~
% ~
I' . ~ ~ J8 ~ ~ ~y~~
1 . _ ' 1',.; M N i
r~ y ~ ~ ~ : ~ LL. ~ " U e . ~
. _ ~ W ~ , - re • ~
~ ~ . 818 r~ ~ ;~;'i , i: % ~ ~
i\\,~1 ~ C ' Q T Sq~~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ' ~ .
1 0 j; /l/
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !I~ ~ ~ t~\`~ \ ` N Y V~~V / ' ! /~ir~, ~i , V QI ~
~ ~ , '/,%/li, e ----~~euoaaw ~ pf ~ _
* , ; ~ . ~ : . i ~ ~ ~ ~~;~``~1\~` / ~ ~~i;;
~ ■ ~ , ~ _ f / . \ ~ ~ ~ ~ / . c
~ ',1~. ` (jM f~ ~ % a~ _ ~ ~ / ~ - - - - _VS; _ ~ i / ~
~ ~ ;
~ i ~ ~ ~r~. . . t~ ~ tr
I . , _ ; y :
~I o . .,~a~.~e11 ~ ~ wi~~oiQ ~ ' ' ~ ~ ~ ~ : :1U ' f ; ~w
- i , ~no~~ ~ ~ . N ~ st ri , ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r, i, ~ ~e; ~ : ~ , ; , 0 l. ~i ~ ; ; i v~ ~ V V, •
1 ti. ~
~ , ~ W IZlil~~ _ ~ ; il1 ~ ~i- : , o , . - ~ , ~ y~; o ~ ; ; ~t ~ m - r
~ . , , ~ . w ,cu ~ _ _ ~ ~
. , , x c ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~i ~
c' ~ - ~ f ~ d t t =.~~-u-~t~-~-~-~-~- . ~r ~ ~ -f~t~r-~-~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ e~
• ~ ~ , \ , , . , ~ , ~ ; , ~ ~ . \ \ ~~,ti: • I 1~ i ~ N~
~ t~~l ~ ~ ~ ' ,
~ - ~ ~ ~ ; - - - - - ~a ~
~ ~ Y _ ~$1 ~ g . ~ 2 . -
~ ~r~r r~~~~ o _ u ~ - - ~
.5~ o a 4th ~ ~ ake~ ~e end 1 . g . . th ~ , -
~ . ~ m a ; ~ - . . ~th c - ~1h ~y ~ ~
ECSP P ~ ~ , Q _ ~ ~lL y - . ~th , ~
A 4 , c a ~ > ~~o n I ~ e ~ ~
_ Ecs-~ - - ! , ~ _9
c ~ ~ ~ > ECS-2 m ~ ~ 10
_ - _ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~n ~ ECS•3 a 11t ~
_ * _ ~1... 0 I t ~ ~'s i~ C~.~-~ _ ` ` _ ~ .
ECS-4 : - - ~ Z 1 > 3_ _ r
~ : - b ~ ~ E~~ ~ th ~ . 14 ~ 1,. _ o _ c t ~ n ~
~ - fi ECS-6 •C. - o~
~ ~ Q I 'I~b_ _
h ~ o ~ ; a m ~ h ~ G~ ~ T
~ ~ t E - ~ _ ~
-L > ~ o I ' r ' / I ~ - 8
~l l ~ g 0 • , 21st
{ n ~ ~ ~ V ~~5, C / I I ~ ~ -
I i ± 5 _ - o _ r
.a . b a ~ ~ ~ y ~ 24 h ~ 24t a - tW_ J
~h ~ I . _ 4 • - - , . -
2 ~ _ 8un h o~ - ~ Q 1111111 ~ 11111
11 ~ ~ ~o 7 - ~f
v1 u I - ~
~ _ 19t - - c - ~ enora ~ ~
c , ~ a
1 - ~ i. 1
~~t 1 ~ .
g 34th _ _ _ ~ ~ J ~
M e/I ~ a . _ ~ .
J ~ . ~
i3 J~
~th ' ■ ■ _ ~
■
. - ~~~~t ,
~ A
- \ . . . . { ~ . . ~ _ . - _ L\~ \ \ _ . \ y~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ♦ . ~ /Y , _ \ ' - " ~ . , ~ . , ~ ' .
~ t~ ~ ~ . ~ . . . \ I , x •~\\r\.. . . . ~ ~ ' ist o I 1st _ ~ ~ ~ I~ . . ; - ~
~ ~ : ~ : m . . ~ ~~..nr ~~ir~~ ~r ~ ~ - ~
~ ~ ~ w _ « ~ - ~11ey ~ ar~ti~..~ ~ . . n ~C a ~ ■ '~S 1~0.
~ ~ 4 ' 41h ~ ~ a, i - - - - - - - , - - . ; ~ '~r ~ m ~ ~ °i ~
~L o ~ ~ m _ ~ I ~ -~c . ~ . ~ ~ > I ~
'~6th I - e • ~ al1 > _ tth a ~r- ~ ~ s1 e
r r ~ , n s~n _
- ~ ~ 9 - - ~ - . ~ - ~ -
o c . - 10 _ - - ~ , I -1Qt - F~(- ~ ~ ~ ~
it ~ ~ a;,, -w ~,r c o t ~ t o "p~ A ni ■ - ~
_ _ - ~ Zt~l ~ ~ • i ;~i ~ . . .a 13 _ ~ ~
I ~ ~ - . - ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m . ~ ~1~cn 1 .
- ~ ~ lon - 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~lr ~ _ ~ - - " ~ ~
~ a~ t~h ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ '`~f ~ , _ th ~ I h_ . ~ ~ _ , /i
_ . _ m ~ 3 ~ 7t ~ ' ~ fl,~I ~...1 I ~ ~ ~ ~l
L th _ ~ S a 18th . _ r -,1 -
1 ~ ~ a ~ E ~ _ . ~ _ - ~~s A d t - ;a , ~ \
201h ' ~ - 5un~, • ' - ~ - 1 b .
~ GI _ n~ « ~ - - 2 d y ~
~ ~c ~ - ,c ~ ~
~ ~ 3r . _ ~a ~ V
a Z4th - 4 ~ ~ _ _ r 25th ~Sth ro
_2~_. ~ ~ Sun~ 6th y 2 th - ~ - ~ 1 1 1
t 111 1 1111 11 r, ~ . o It~ ~ I 7th - - ~ ~i
r~ ~8 - r -
' 29th - c - ,m ~ ~ 2 , , eno, r ~ ~e end I
~ _ n~ 9 a - i ~ ~ '
t ~ 1s~ ~ ~ _ . EC3PQP 1
~ I~ii~ . ~ PQPtO
~1.- ' s th ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - c ~ ~ . ECS-t
~ 19 c ~I o i - ~
- - p ~ ECS2 ~ I
~ ECS-3 J • ~
~ - ■ Ecs~
a ~ ~ o ~ - ~ ECS-5
~ Illr
~ ~ - a ~ _
-
et Gatafdo ot.16
` : QF
_ SP t
~ E
_ ~ 1 , - dWay
~ d . . _ ~t4a POPiD
~ •
ES't -
it~
►a Es z
M'$ on ~
%
a 1 ' ■ ES-3 -
.tatd r '
~ Eg,A
M ~ n°° ro dv~. Y-- ; Mtx
M 11 i ~ ~ t 1Q`1 ' t- .
E ~ r c a'~• 1 r
~ m G- 5
Q lt~ .~~7
1 R E
~ i~-
r,3 o. . Fs-7
~ n _ ~ ; .
il yway ` t
. 0
~ ^~~ti:•... 1
t .
' T
tde ~ t
{ ~ M
$o
m r
t u► r
: a ■
r
8th „ i 10t
A° ■ 1~f ~
i~
■ 1' 1111
~ 111 ~
■
b ■
■
~ r
■
■
s
~ ~ ~ ■
a ~
I t , •
V
1.,, _ ~ tw
a 111~
; ~y11
~ M
p~ ♦
0 ~ ♦
i
■
Q •
W
1 ~ &00"~V I
r
l - `~t~ . , ~ ~ ~ ~ _ i~ ~ Mrs ~ _ i~ L ~ ~;ti: m ~t~ _ ~'f ~ ~C' . . .
:ia E~, ~ar~Eao. Le end , a~ ~ - . _ - 9 E _ ~
~~#t#~1l f1 ~ IU1! ~1. Mlln~ ~ ~ ES-8 - A - - ----FF ' - . ~ ~;ti t -y-._ . - . ESPQP
~ . _ adwa ~ Q , cc ~Q 8roadwa - - _ Bro- - -Y . - _ Y ( ~ ngfietd ~ ■
. . PQPID Sptln Id ' ;c a s .
~ ! ~ E Alkt ~ ki ~ L : f~ ES-1
m , , ~ ~ ~ id : . ~ ~ m a . a0 ° ~ m c 01 ~ _ 1e`~- ~ a m _ . ES-2
~ i ~ a ~ Ile a ~ , o ~ _ ~ - _ 1~+ Y--- 1~~:~: ~
~ 4~-. ' Va{{eY~►~ ES-3 M y , z ~ I ,f ■ r-:~~ _ . n N
, _ ~ - ~ , ~ ES.7 ~ . ~ ~ _ ~ • Es-~ , .
t ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ES-6 V@f~5 , • L ~ ti~ o C M U R l ES-5 \ ~ ~ Q ~
~ . ES 5 • . . ~ . , F ~ ~ ~ ~ . _ L S ra ue : . . . . \ , . . . . S u _ ~ p g - - - g - ES-6
- ~ - - ~ti ~ . 1'~" ~ ~
1st ~ - , : . ■ -~a : ~ c ES-7 ~ ~ ~ i c . -
Znd ~ ~ _ _ ~ I~.' _ ~ . c ES-8
~ 3r o * ~ I , ~4th '
„4th - - ~ ~ _ - - ~ - i ES.4 - i 5tr~__
~ ~i ~ th ; ~ ` m
R-3 _6th. ~ u ~ ~ e ~a ~ m ~ ~ ~ ■ ~ ~ m t w
- ' rm ~~d ~ . ( ~ (m ■
I " N 8th ~ m ' r - - - ~r ~t~~i
~ ~ . ~ . ~ ES'3 - _ ~ ~I ■
o _ ~o - ~o _ . ~ _ 1I~ • • 1 ~ R•1 . , . ~ - w
~ _ . <<fi - ~ - 1 _ ~ ~1tth E ~ ~ - • ~~f ~ :d~-C-- ! ~Q - ~f1
y ~ a , ' = ■ l~ _ _ ~ _ . ~t _ c _ _ - w~ o ~ 1 ;r~- - 11
~ { / ~ T.~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ i ~ - - ■ ~ C. I . , 1~ . _ ~ . -'T'.~ ■
~ i 13t ~ ~ _ . - ~ r H t ~ _ r~, _ ~ m , - .
~ , ~ , . Eg.2 _ . ES-1 I ~ ~ - . 15t ~ 3~ - . I i
~ ~,r i . - - ~ - R-4 - e ~ R-2 :-;;f,/
- - ~~~i~~~~~i~~~~~~~~r~~~~~~~~ - • . t - -
7 t ~ ♦
3 _ 1 h ;
i J ~
eC ~ / ~ _ r
~0 1~11 ~r ~ ~
a ~w~
~ ~ 4 ~ , o v
I ~ Ilt ♦ ~ ~h
th 1 I
@St j i ~ ' - I ~ ~ ; . ~tee3
es ~ ~ - - ~~t~n~
alvl ; ~,~~~0 0~0 , ~I ~ ! , ~ a v~n _ ~ ~ I rnen ~ c
~ ms m ' ~
clam ~ ~Mpu~l ~ il I
~ L - r I ~ ~ ; ; " _ "m~ . ; i-/~, , ~ uc~ii~
~ _ ~ ~ a res ~
_ , :,r-„ ~ , , ,
,r ' ' - _ ~ ~ ~ k_ ~.c m
~ ~ i ~ ~~,~.0 ~ ~ Z 1 ~ I I n~ , ~ W
J~' ~ ~ ~ ~
u;t1"r~ t11~~~ a" /IEItI;~tlI~Il~tt/i~//~ ~tti~~~ ? a ~ , ` , / : ~ _ ~ ~ , , ~T'1--` 4~~1 1 1 <
~ f Pion~r ~ ; -~,.Z ~
' ; . Fi.rqlridustria - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
; r ~ P~ark ~i,st f• r o0 4 l . ~"'n _ 1
+ ~ 1 •,+~'f~-`'~op r---+w• ~ a • p ~ ' w ~ ~C 7!'C "
r `4~' - ~ ~ ~ ~ . ; ~ ' OJ ~~Q ~ ' _ Q~~~~ I 3 C ~
~ Ir m ~ d I ~ t~ C ~ ~i ~ ^ ~ y;.- ni •
~ ~ !n ~ 'Larch ~
Ftora - ~ ~ - ~ ~ Indus al~ ~m c~ ~ I an ~ ~ -
'~1 Park 4th n~ I ; on n
_ _ : 31---~ ~nny ~~Mr Indusvial _
~ m Park 5th
o ~
~ ~ m ,a
a ? . _ ~ - Flora ~
~ ; °t~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~
e o t > >
- ~O I re s _
~ ; _ m ~ - Tschirley w ~
Co N' .Z ~ ■
v~
M ~
"9 m
~ Eden '
~ ~ F 1'~' ~ ~
~ r
~ roenacres ( , x~ ~?~~.V = , ~ '
r~~ 1 11 1 ~ ~ t!~ ~ ' 't, ~ n / ~ . ~ . ~ ~
~ d~ ~ ~ , , . , ~ i p ~ ~ ~~~r ~ , . .'I! '
/ , - ~ - ~ L- -Li'- . . $8f4C@r: , ~ . , ~l~; ' N a~ ~~7r-~ , • ~r ' ff`' •
~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~.i,~ ~ ~ ~ f J ~ ~ ~ ~ l~! ' ~ _ ~ ` ~a~ co ~fj~~,.~~~ ~ f~/~~ /j%
, ~ \ n ~ti a, , '!/~7 j/~ % l ~ , / ~ m ~ s~.~, ~ r` ~ ~ / /
~ ~ \ ~ J~r/j~fr_, ~ R ~ ~ , . l1/ ~ f / ~ ~ , ~,','n Z ~ G , •f; ~ ~ ; ~i~J// J ~ ~ fI ~jl. ~ , . ~'-'0~ ~ ~ Ii ~ / ,f s' f' ~ J' ~ / . / JJ / ! ~ /
~ j`";'~ ~ ~ ( / , ~ ~ ~ l@ ~ ~ /J ~r/ •/,/J i ~ j,,J~ • ` ~ f N = , r / ~ ~ ! / / , , ~ e~ / f / ~ f~~/J//
i•, ~ ~ ~ ~ , . ~l ~ ~ , ~ . , ~ < ~ i.~ ~ , ~ . ~ 3 ~ y , , ~ • ~ ~ - _
~ ~ - . , - _ a;.---~-r--~ 0x~~ , r ~ jJ,,/~:; , „ . ~ -~o~ ~ .
- ~ ~~~~~~r~~~ 1~~~~ yl1~r~~~1111~//~i~~ytr ~irrrt~~~~~~~i~l~ri~~~t~~~~ivt ~
-o m q' ~ Q Z ~
~:5 ~ -p -0 ~
m m m m ~
~ ~ ~ W N ~ ~
P4PID ,
60-
1~ • ~
~
is ~ • E14-3
~ • :
EtA.-3
1~,~ • ~ Et~
'ot Yal
ueQn
c c •
0~ ~ s
0 h0
~ ~ `t t~ • $
n9~
m `E •
m _ •
~
t ~
d
0ti
_r-- •
~
" II 0~' ~ "r t •
c Al $ •
~ - s
. lp Co r
; 1 •
- ~ . - , _ - ausui
tk ~ dvst
an atk~ r ; •
_ Kley-- ; •
t r
du ~ ` ca t ~a 1to 11 . - , , ~ta •
; r ~a •
d ~ ~ .
tf~~~ qs to , '"'d i _ •
tndv G~ac_ ~
~ u
~ack ~9 . rt~
M ~
; M
io r
_ • N ~1 ~ ;
• ~ ~ .
~ .
~ , . l .
as
m
o t' s 1d -
a x In.
J cM
• t
w 7G. rr
10
ex
•
r
~O•
o0ne g0 tal
~ . _ 1 8~ - % _ ~ ~rrl1r