The URL can be used to link to this page

2009, 04-14 Regular Meeting _. ` AGEND.A SPO�i:.ANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL RF.GULAR MEETING Council Meetiag #157 Tuesday, April 14, 2009 6:00 p.m. Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers 11707 � SprAgue Avenue Counril Requests Please Silc�ece Your Cell Phones Dr�rr��g Council Meeting CALL TO ORUER: INVU�:A'I'ION: Pastc�r Juhrz Vanden��alker, Community of Christ Church PLEDGE OF ALLECI4NCE: ROLL CALL: a�PPROVaL UF AGEN`DA: INTRODUC7'ION UF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESEN'T�`CIONS: CONI�iITTEE. BOARD, LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS: 1�t�1YOR'S REPORT: PLJBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunit}� for tlie public to speak oc� any subject not on the agenda for action. Wlten you come tc� thc podium, please state } �otir i�ame and aci�res, f�,r tfic� rcci�rtl �i(1C� Ii1111I remarks to three minut�s. l. Pt?BLIC �iE.�Rt1G: �lmcndcd #2, 2U09 'I'ra�s�fortation Improvement Program — Steve Worlc�� 2. CONSEN"T A(TF,NDA: Cun�ists uf items considered routine whic)i are approved as a group. f� Councilmember may remove an item from the Consent �lgenda to be considered separately. a. Claim Vouchers: VOUCHER LIST DATE WIVOC,�CHER NUMI3ERS: TOTAL A.MOUNT 0312U/2009 16902-16932 $187,807.23 03l27/?009 16977-16987 � 14, 517.21 O�i/03/2009 16993-17010 $6,949.0� 04I03/2009 16988-170�9; and 33090014; 401090010 $2,736,827.10 GRAND TOT�iL �2,946, l 00.58 b. Payroll for pay period ending March 31, 2009: $363 c. Approval of Interlocal Agreement with State of W�shington Depar�t.ment ��f Licensin� d. Appraval uf Regular Council Meeting Minutes of March 2�1, 2009 e. Approval of Council Study Session Nleeting Niinutes of March 31, 200�) NEV4' BLISINESS 3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 09-005 Airport Overlay — Karen Kendall [pub[ie commentj 4. Secand Reading Proposed Ordinance 09-007, Havana Street Bridge Project — Mike Connelly (public comment] 5. First Reading Propose� Urdinance 09-008 Amending Comp Plan — Mihe Basinger [public comment ) 6. First Reading Proposed Ordinance 09-009 Amending Zoning Map — Mike Basinger [public commeat� 7. First Reading Proposed (�rdinance 09-!11 �1. I3��t�h C'o :�l11c'.Ilt�ill�ill C'��ristina .Iai��,�i� [public comment] Council Agcnda ()3 fteoular !�ie�;i►�`� Page l of � 8. First Reading Proposed Ordinance U9-011 Amendin� SVMC 3.�� — Ken "Thomp�on [public commentJ 9. Proposed Resolution 09-00� Amending 2009 Transportation Improvement Plan — Neil Kersten/ Steve Worley jpublic commentJ 10. Proposed Resolution 09-Q0�. I3ankin� :'luthorit� — Ken Thompson (public cumment [ r 1]. I��ic�tion Consideration: lntcrl��cal :'1�r�erne:nt �ti�itli City c�l' Spc�k�r�e Re Ha�•ana �3ricl�� I��like C��nnell�� [public commentJ y 1?. �vlotion Gonsideration: Pines PCC Intersection Bid Award — Neil Kersten (public comment� PUBLIC COMMEiYTS This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any topic. W'hen you come to the rodium, please state ��c►ur name and address f�r the rec�rd and limit remarks to three minutes. AD�TINISTIL��,TIVE REPORTS: 1�. Citv Finane:e 101 — Dave Merci�r . 14. Tourism Promotion Area — Liz E3eck 1�. Agenda Items for Tentati��e Spokane City%Council Joint Meering — May�,r �-tunson INFORM:�TION ONLY': 16. ICMA Assessment Update - 17. Spokane Valley Arts Council Sculptur� Upclate 18. Edward Byrr�e i1�1erT�ori�l Justice :'�s5istance t:�rant (J.AG) :1�re�•rnent 19. EXEC[.1TIVF. SESSION: Penc�inb Liti�ation; 1....�nd Acc.�ui�ition :�DJOCTRNM�NT FUTG'RE SCHEDULE (i»eetiirg scl�edi.rle �s c�lr�-ays suhjec! �o chu�tge� Regulnr Cvr�ncil Meet�ngs are generolly held 2nd aird 4'"' Tuesdas�s, beginni�rg at 6: 00 p.n:. Cntt►t�il.Strttlt' S�.s:sian.c nre�e�rerrrll�� /re1J 1�. .�' n�id Sllt Trtec�ln��.s. he��iirni�r�� n1 G:�l(lP.�rt. ��OTICE: lndividunls planning to :tttenJ thr m�zting ��ho requirc; sprcial as�istance to accommodate physical, hzaring, or other irnpainnents, please contflct the City Clerk at (?09) 9? �_ � �OQ �s coon as possihle � th�t �rran�emints m4y be made. � uiincil ��Len:la Ii i-1 �a-i19 Rr�iil;�r i�lcctins P:��c- 2 ul , CITY OF SP4KANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: April 14, 2009 City Manager Sign-off. Item: Check all that appiy: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business � pubiic hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: Draft Amendment #2 - 2009 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adopted 2009-2014 Six Year TIP on June 24, 2008, Resolution #08-014; Information Memos on Federal Stimulus Projects at December 16` Meeting and SRTC prioritization list in January 13 Council Packet; Public Hearing and adoption on January 27, 2009 of the Amended 20�9 TIP. BACKGROUND: Council adopted the Amended 2009 TIP based upon information staff had earlier this year including information relative to the federal economic stimulus funding program. Since then the projects selected for economic stimulus funding includes only the Sprague Ave Resurfacing Project 1— University to Evergreen. According to information staff has received from the SRTC there may be an opportunity for additional federal economic stimulus funding through redistributed funds. We have asked the SRTC to include the Sp�ague Ave Resurfacing Project 2— Evergreen to Sullivan on their list for redistributed economic stimulus funds. Staff also realized that the Sprague Ave ADA Improvements Project was inadvertently left out of the Amended 2009 TIP adopted by Council on January 27, 2009. This CDBG funded project is a carryover from 2008 and has been designed, bid, and awarded and is ready to go to construction this spring. Staff also recommends moving forward with the design of the Bowdish Rd — 32" to 8�' Project and the Evergreen/32" — 16�' to 32" Evergreen to SR27 Project this year. Completing the designs of these finro projects puts them in an advantageous position to receive future federal funding. Based on this information, it is recommended that the 2009 TIP be amended again to reflect the deletion of the projects that did not receive funding, include those projects that were not completed in 2008 and have been carried over to the 2009 construction year, and include those projects that would begin design work. Attached is a summary of the proposed changes. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Conduct Public Hearing BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The 2009 budget has sufficient funds to accommodate the projects associated with this draft Amendment #2 - 2009 TIP. STAFF CONTACT: Steve Worley, Senior Capital Projects EngineEr Neil Kersten, Public Works Director; ATTACHMENTS: Draft Amendment #2 - 2009 TIP Clty of 3pokane Valley Department ot PubNc Worka Amended 2409 Transportatfon Imp�ovement Program Resolutlon 09-003, January 27, 2009 Pr�mary C�ty Tota1200� P�oject From To Source Amount Projed Cos:� 0 Broadway Ave Safety Projed Pines (SR 27) Park UAP � 187,000 � 933,Guu 1 Pines/Mansfield Mon�omery Plnes (SR-27) TPP � 206,000 � 1,796,000 2 8arker Raad Bridge � Spokane River BR $ 1,182,000 $ 8,727,000 3 ApplewaylSprague/Dishman-Mica ITS I-90 Dishma� Mice CMACZ 3 62,500 a 644.400 4 STEP Pavebadc Verious locetions City $ 1,291,000 � 1,500,000 Rocicwell Phas - - c, , �' �'�' Ctement Rotd�ford Acre Valleyview IMest Ponderc, � 6 �IVaY�YOyAVe f\CI�C� I�..t.' I� �.. iJi Iri�lui� � Ll:yf� :: L.. ,.'.+V�� li!°*�L1'v'- 7 Appleway Ave Extension University Evergreen STP(U) $ 121,000 $ 937,000 8 WSDOT Urban Ramp Projec�s Broadway, Argonne, Freya UC City $ 300,000 y 300,000 9 Pines/Sprague Intersec#ion PCC STA $ 152,000 S 742,000 10 44th Ave Pathway Sands Woodruff STP(E) $ 44,000 � 328,OQ0 11 Broadway Avenue Rehab #2 Fanche� Thierman STP(U) $ 82,000 $ 608,000 12 Park Road Project 2(PE Only) Broadway Indiana STP(U) � 48,000 $ 352,000 16 Sprague Ave Resurfacirtg Project 1 University Evergreen Fed Stim $ 150,000 3 2,573,000 17 Eve�green/Spregue Intersection PCC STA S 233,000 $ 1,133,000 18 McOonald/Sprague Intersec�on PCC STA � 219,000 � 1,069,000 BroadwaylFancher PCC intersed+on STP(U) � 119,100 � 771,10i: Signal Controqer Upgrade CMAGI a 12,600 � 83,60U Spra�ue/Conkiin Signal Developer S 35,OQ0 � 245,0(N_� Sprague Ave Resurfaang Everyreen Sul(ivan Fed Stim � 95,Q00 $ 1,335,OOG Euc�d Ave Resurfacfig Sullivan Fbra Fed S�m S 69,000 � 870,OOC� -..�� 32nd Ave Resurfacinp Dishman Mice SR 27 Fed Stim � 71,040 S 996,OOC� Sulitvan Rd Resuriadng Indiana Eudid Fed b'tim � 105,000 S 1,475,OOC Dishman Mica Resurfadng �1 16th Unfversity Fed Stim � 89,000 � 1,245,000 Dishman Mic:a Resurfac.mg #�2 8owdish City limiCs Fed Stim � 31,000 � 429,OOG Bowdish Rd 32nd 8th Fed Stlm $ 779,000 � 4,793,OOG Flora Rd Sprague Mission Fed Stim � 524,000 � 3,88fi Reconst Mission Ave Flors Bartcer Fed Stim S 495,OOQ � 3,598�OOG Ever+BreeN32nd 16th/Everpreen 32nd/SR 27 Fed Stim S 746,000 � 4,387�OOC� Barlcer Roed &h Appleway Fed Stim $ 447,000 $ 2,896,000 Camahan Trudc Lene 8th City Limlls Fed SUm $ 384,000 E 2,491,OOQ Indiana Ave Extension 3,600' E of SuliNan Flora TIB $ 160,000 S 802,OOC� � b.E.53 200 a 53.124 1Qr, City of Spokane Vailey Departrnent of Public Works Propoaed Amendment �2 2009 Transportation Improvement Program Re�olution 09-0OX. Aprii 14, 2009 Primary City Tota120Q9 Project From To Source Amount Project Costs 0 Braadway Ave Safety Project Pines (SR 27) Parfc UAP $ 186,570 $ 932,850 , 1 Pines/Mansfield Montgomery Pines (SR-27) TPP $ 120,000 $ 1,556,000 I 2 Barker Road Bridge � Spokane River BR $ 1,182,000 $ 8,727,000 ' 3 ApplewaylSpraguelDishrnen-Mica ITS I-90 Dishman Mica CMAQ $ 61,903 $ 639,614 4 STEP Paveback Various locations City Rockwell Phase 2 $ 20,477 $ 215,887 Clement (InGudes 3211,095 CDBG Grant) a 113,505 a 324,600 Rotchford Acxes $ 432,000 $ 432,000 Valleyview $ 300,000 $ 300,000 West Ponderosa Phase I $ 770,000 S 770,000 West Ponderosa Phase I1 $ 516,000 $ 516,000 6 Broadway Ave Reconstruction 180 ft. E of Moore Flora UAP $ 249,000 � 857,000 7 Appleway Ave Extension Unlversit}r Evergreen STP(U) $ 121,000 $ 937,000 8 WSDOT Urban Ramp Projects Broadway, Argonne, Freya I/C City a 276,000 $ 276,000 9 PineslSprague Intersedion PCC STA $ 187,000 $ 912,000 10 44th Ave Pathway Sands Woodruff STP(E� $ 44,000 $ 328,000 11 8roadway Avenue Rehab #2 Fancher ThieRnan STP(U) $ 81,180 $ 601,520 12 Park Road Project 2(PE Only) Broadway Indiena STP(U) $ 47,453 $ 351,648 16 Sprague Ave Resurfacing ProJect 1 University Evergreen Fed Stim � 190,004 $ 3,080,000 17 Evergreen/Sprague Intersection PCC STA $ 216,000 $ 1,063,000 18 McOoneld/Sprague Intersection PCC STA $ 188,000 S 912,000 BroadwaylFancher PCC Intersedion STP(U) $ 119,100 S 771,100 Signal Controller Upgrade CMAQ � 12,084 � 89,512 Sprague/Conklin Signal Developer � 35,000 a 282,000 � Spregue Ave ADA Improvements CDBG � 10,000 S 55,000 ! Sprague Ave Resurfacing #2 Evergreen Sullivan Fed 8tlm i 85�000 ; 1�336,000 &�wa� �a Fed-St��a ��a�9A i---��88A Preserv �� , A ��'�'� �#+a�a �s1id Fe�S�'� _----�g6 , � � Lk�i�e�y Fetl-S#+�� 88 �-�-,246,�AAA 8ewdis#� 6��i�s f-e�-S� 0-3� , A9 Bowdish Rd 32nd 8th Fed 3tlm S 660,000 f 660�000 F�er�� &�g�e �4+se�iefl �-S� , 9 , Reconst A+I+aaie�A�e FJe�a 8�r#�ef Fe�-�#ic� , 0� s-�-3f�A&8Ag EvergreeN32nd 16th/Evergreen S2nd/SR 27 Fed St(m t 406�000 s 406,000 �a�ea� 8� Ap�ewa� Fed-S� o-',�-,QAB �-=,886 8t# 6�k�ts �ed-S� , , , Indiana Ave Extension 3,600' E of Sullivan Flora T16 S 51,000 $ 738,000 $ 6,582.272 $ 27,958,731 • The Strxt Pres�n+ation Projects will be wmplete� as staff and funding levels allow, Budget foc Svett Pcesetvation Frojtets induda SSOU,000 contingency Projects and timefnmes ideatiSad 'm tbe TIP are w be conaidered � oaly that may eh�age due W a variety ef ch��aaataacea, and ue aot amend�d by tbe City to be nlied apon bY PmpeRy owners or Funded Projeds Added Prnjecta 2008 CaRy Over Prajecis �ITi `'1�' +C�� P`+�'I�A1� E 'll'AsLL��'" F��a�st f�r Cc��i� A�t��n I'�I��ting Dafi+e: [�-1�-�� C�t� l�an�g�r Sig�r-�##: It++E;rn: Chec�t �,l #h�t apply: � cc�nsen# �+ald ��i�r��s [] n�w busin�s� � publi� h�aring '[] �nf�rrr��t�ar� �J adm€ra. repart � p�n�di�� I��i�la�ion �It'aE�D��41T�1� TiTL�: ApprQV�l r�f�e Fc�l�t�wir��'�'�au�l�er�: 4�'�TJGH�R I�I��T �A"�'E �w''NC]�[J�GH�R I�I�M��a �++�TAI� �M�}C��` ��f�Dl:�� 6��D2-1 f �3� � 1 �?,8�7.Z3 �}��271��]�9 ��77-��957 $14,�1�'.�1 � �a��a�� -i�� ,��.�a �a�� 1��,��-��s�� ; �a�o��i� ��,��,��.�� +��A� `�'+�TAL $?,�� 6,1 +��}. � � ��G�D�VIIV�E�[�E� A�TI[7�N C)F� I�IGIT��I: A►�ap��ve cl�ims ��r v�uch�rs �s �i��d ak�s�v�. BU[�GET'!�'�N�NClAL IMF"ACT�: �TA�FF +C��TA�T: Lis� Cc�m�bs,l��c�unt�ng 7e�hr�i�i�� ATTACHI�I��JTS �l�ou�h�r Lists vchlist Voucher List Page 1 03/20/2009 1:32:05PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Da�e Vendor Invoice PO # Descripdon/Account Amount 16902 3/20/2009 000197 AIRFACTZ 30352 DRMNG RECORD REPORT 15.75 Total : 15.75 16903 3/20/2009 001081 ALSCO LSP0573026 FLOOR MATS 15.22 LSP0573027 FLOOR MATS: PRECINCT 2.75 Total : 17.97 16904 3/20/2009 000334 ARGUS JANfTORIAL LLC 003342 JANITORIAL SVCS: CP 2,165.23 Total : 2,165.23 16905 3120/2009 000030 AVISTA 010119017 UTILITIES: PARKS MASTER AVISTA 10,427.63 410069444 UTILITIES: PW MASTER AVISTA 22,463.23 Total : 32,890.86 16906 3l20/2009 000271 BAINBRIDGE, CHRISTINE FEB 2009 EMPLOYEE REIMBURSEMENT 13.20 Total : 13.20 16907 3/20/2009 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC 9000988 LINEN SUPPLY AND SERVICE:CP 190.99 9002896 LINEN SUPPLY 150.58 9005261 LINEN SUPPLY 213.50 Total: b55.07 16908 3J20/2009 001102 CIWDC 2795 REGISTRATIONS 400.00 Total : 400.00 16909 3/20/2009 000571 CODE PUBLISHING CO 32537 MUNICIPAL CODE UPDATE 175.93 32551 MUNICIPAL CODE UPDATE 412.02 Total : 587.95 16910 3/20/2009 000109 COFFEE SYSTEMS INC 3820:019716 COFFEE SUPPLIES 319.16 Total : 319.16 16911 3/20/2009 000326 CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION #19 FEB 2009 WATER CHARGES 61.55 Total : 61.55 16912 3/20/2009 000912 DEX MEDIA WEST MAR 2009 ADVERTiSING: SENIOR CTR 40.00 Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List Page 2 03/20/2009 1:32:05PM Spokane Valiey Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Descript�on/Account Amount 16912 3/20/2009 000912 000912 DEX MEDIA WEST (Continued) Total : 40.00 16913 3/20/2009 001249 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY P21567550101 42300 SUMMER PROGRAM SUPPLIES 253.89 Total : 253.89 16914 3/20/2009 001447 FREE PRESS PUBUSHING INC 31804 LEGAL PUBLICATION 25.00 31 gp5 LEGAL PUBLICATION 129.20 31806 LEGAL PUBLICATION 71.40 Total : 225.60 16915 3/20/2009 001908 HP D(PRESS SERVICES INC HPE725921 42303 HP DCPRESS POST WARRANTY RE 2,505.00 Total : 2,505.00 16916 3/20/2009 000401 INLAND NW CHAPTER OF ICC 2009 MEMBERSHIPS 125.00 Tobl : 125.00 16917 3120/2009 000388 IRViN WATER DIST. #6 FEB 2009 FEB 09 WATER CHARGES 166.OQ Total : 166.00 16918 3/20/2009 001635 ISS FACILITYlEVENT SERVICES 20533 EVENT SVCS: CP 118.20 20582 EVENT SVCS: CP 118.20 20645 MONTHLY CLEANING 7,136.00 2p64g EVENT SVCS: CP 98.50 Total : 7,470.90 16919 3120/2009 000437 LIBERTI( LAKE SPLASH 2O09 NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION 50.00 Total : 50.00 16920 3/20/2009 001684 MARKETiNG SOLUTIONS NW CP 3-4-09 ADVERTISING: CP 13,780.00 Total : 13,780.00 16921 3/20/2009 000469 NORTHWEST PLAYGROUND EQUIP INC 30835 42234 PICNIC SHELTER FOR VALLEY MIS 42,325.61 Total : 42,325.61 16922 3/20/2009 000283 NRPA 2009 MEMBERSHIPS 320.00 Total : 320.00 16923 3/20/2009 000512 OFFICETEAM 23384973 STAFFING SVC: LASERFICHE 652.00 Page: 2 vchlist Voucher List Page 3 03/20/2009 1:32:05PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendof Invoice PO � Description/Account Amount 16923 3/20�'2009 000512 OFFICETEAM (Continued) 23384974 STAFFING SVC: LASERFICHE 301.55 Total : 953.55 16924 3/20/2009 001860 PLATT 580058B MISC SUPPLIES: CP 53.40 5806986 SUPPLIES: CP 9.65 5810302 SUPPLIES: CP 116.16 5813710 SUPPLIES: CP 51.48 5831270 SUPPLIES: CP 42.83 Total : 2T3.52 16925 3l20r1009 000322 QWEST 509-924-4707 740B PHONE SERVICE: TERRACE V1EW 110.50 509-926-1840-194B PHONE SERVICE: PARK RD POOL 110.80 Totsl : 221.30 16926 3f10/2009 000709 SENSKE LAWN 8 TREE CARE INC. 2997116 CONTRACT MAINT: CP 51,859.00 2997117 CONTRACT MAINT: CENN TRAIL 2,018.68 3020534 PEST CONTROL: PRECINCT 70.66 30fi5130 LAWN CARE: PRECINCT 48.86 3405273 FORKLIFT RENTAL: PARKS 162.52 Total: 54,159.72 16927 3l20/2009 000323 SPOKANE CO UTILfTIES MAR 2009 SPOKANE COUNTY SEWER 1,283.20 Total : 1.283.20 16928 3/20/2009 000406 SPOKANE REGIONAL CVB 1866 REGISTRATION: CP 25.00 FEB 2009 TOURISM MARKETING CONTRACT 19,66fi.67 Total : 18,691.67 16929 3/20/2009 001083 STANDARD PIBG HEATING COfYTROLS 26426 JAN 09 MONTHLY MAINT: PRECINC 491.87 26039 FEB 09: MONTHLY MAINT: PRECINc 521.39 Total : 1.013.26 16930 3/20/2009 000468 TRANSOFT SOLUTIONS INC. 45750 42310 TRANSOFT TORUS SOFTWARE W/ 4,699.00 Total : 4�699.00 16931 3/20/2009 000295 VALLEYFEST 1143 LODGING TAX REIMBURSEMENT 995.00 Page: 3 vchlist Voucher List Page 4 03/20/2009 1:32:OSPM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 16931 3/20/2009 000295 000295 VALLEYFEST (Continued) Totai : 995.00 16932 3/20/2009 001885 ZAYO BANDWIDTH LLC MARCH 09 DARK FIBER LEASE 228.27 Total : 228.2T 31 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 187,807.23 31 Vouchers i� this repo�t Total vouchers : 187,807.23 I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described berein and that the clai.m is ju�t, due and a.n unpaid obligation againet the City of Spokane Valley, and that 1 am authorized to autbenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director n,�t� Mayor Date Council Member D Page: 4 vchlist Voucher Ljst Page 1 03/27/2009 2:07:03PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Irrvo(ce PO # Desc�iption/Accour�t Amourrt 169n 3rz�12009 00�08� A�SCO LSP05a3954 FLOOR MATS 14.47 Total : 14.47 16978 3/27/2Q09 001012 ASSOC BUSINESS SYSTEMS 3/11/09 COPIER SERVICE: CD 125.00 Total : 125.00 16g7g 3l27l2009 000168 BLACK BOX NETWORK SVC 160074 SERVICE CALL: PHONES 204.90 160180 42275 SUPPORT CONTRACT: PHONES 235.88 Tatal : 440.T8 16980 3127/2009 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 31834 LEGAL PUBLICATION 40.80 31835 LEGAL PUBLICATION 96.05 Total : 136.85 16981 3/27/2009 000917 GRAYBAR 940197066 COMPUTER PARTS: CP 15.84 Total : 15.84 16982 3/27/2009 000353 INTL TRADE ALLIANCE SpV2009 1 ST QTR 2009 - OUTSIDE AG. 6,500.00 Total : 6,500.00 16983 3/27/2009 000616 NEW HORIZONS INC. 28097 TRAINING 2,000.00 Total : 2,000.00 16984 3/27r2009 000405 SPOKANE VALLEY PARTNERS March 2009 OUTSIDE AGENCY REIMBURSEME 2.754.42 Total : 2�754.42 16985 3JZ7/2009 000419 SUMMIT LAW GROUP 41298 PROFESSIONAL SERViCES 48.00 Total : 48.00 16986 3/27l2009 001464 TV11 TELECOM 02812526 INTERNET/DATA LINES: CP 1,657.93 Total : 1,657.83 16987 3/27/2009 001074 ZEE MEDICAL 0161332112 FIRST AID KIT SUPPLIES 823.92 Total : 823.92 11 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 14,517.21 Page: 1 vchiist Voucher List Page 2 03/27/2009 2:07:03PM Spokane Vailey Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Desc�iptionlAccount Amount 11 Vouchers in this repo�t Total vouchers : 14,517.21 I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of pe�jury, that the materials have been fumished, the services rendered, or tfie labor perfom�ed as described he�ein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation agairtst tt�e Clty of Spokane Vailey, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify to safd Gafm. Finance Director Date Page: 2 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 04J03/2009 11:28:52AM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO t� DescriptionlAccount Amount 16993 4/3/2009 001936 ALLIED SYSTEMS PRODUCTS IN099736 ADMIN SUPPLIES 70.05 Total : 70.05 16994 4/3/2009 001081 ALSCO LSP0580312 FLOOR MATS 15.22 LSP0580313 FLOOR MATS 2.75 Total : 17.9T 16995 4/3/2009 000135 APA 183514-090201 PLANNING MEMBERSHIP: CD 210.00 211610-090201 PLANNING MEMBERSHIP: CD 210.00 Total : 420.00 16996 4/3/2009 001409 BEST L1NE 053103192009 ANSWERING SVC: CP 20.00 Total : 20.00 16997 4/3/2009 000109 COFFEE SYSTEMS INC 3820:014139 COFFEE SUPPLIES 60.30 3820:019704 COFFFE SERVICE 117.65 3820:020772 COFFEE SERVICE 177.95 3820:021706 COFFEE SUPPLIES 156.24 Total : 512.14 16998 4/33/2009 000326 CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION #19 MARCH 2O09 WATER CHARGES 61.80 Total : 61.80 16999 4/3/2009 001770 CONSOLIDATED SUPPLY CO S4916683.001 TOILET: CP 96.01 54916903.001 SUPPLIES: PRECINCT 27.98 Totel : 123.99 17000 4/3/2009 Oa0603 CONTRACT DESIGN ASSOC INC 27047 42288 CAPER CHAIRS F�R PONDEROSA 1,526.54 27406 42286 CHAIRS FOR 4FFICE 1,484.98 Total : 3�011.52 17001 4/3/2009 000912 DEX MEDIA WEST MAR 2009 ADVERTISING: CP 225.00 Tota I : 225.00 17002 4/3/2009 000007 GRAINGER 9855963220 SUPPLIES FOR CP 16.43 9864691481 42246 GRAINGER BLANKET PO 23.48 9864691499 42246 GRAINGER BLANKET PO 16.52 Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List Page 2 04/03/2009 11:28:52AM Spokane Vailey Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO �! Description/Account Amount 17002 4/3/2009 000007 000007 GRAINGER (Continued) Total : 56.43 17003 4l3f2009 000022 INLAND BUSINESS PRODUCTS, INC. 56627 PHOTO IDS: HR 23.91 Totai : 23.91 17004 4/3/2009 000070 INLAND POWER 8 LIGHT CO 94202 UTILITIES:PW 439.67 Total : 439.67 17005 4/3r1009 001640 MAINTENANCE SOLUTIONS, INC 31313603 SUPPLIES: CP 215.89 Total : 215.69 17006 4/3/2009 000322 QWEST 509-921-6787 511 B PHONE SERVICE 46.15 509-922-7091-0606 PHONE SERVICE: MISSION POOL 111.50 Total : 157.65 17007 4/3/2009 000935 SERVICE PAPER CO 30444755 42283 RESTROOM SUPPLIES 412.06 Total : 412.06 17008 4/3/2009 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST #3 170-0040-03 WATER: PARK RD POOL 32.95 Total : 32.95 17009 4/312009 000140 WALTS MAILING SERVICE 19824 PRlNT SRVCS 132.22 Total : 132.22 17010 4/312009 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 2420555-2681-6 WASTE MGMT: CENTERPLACE 730.72 2420556-2681-4 WASTE MGMT: PRECINCT 285.27 Total : 1 �015.99 18 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 6�949.04 18 Vouchers In this report Total vouchers : 6,949.04 Page: 2 vchlist Voucner List Page: 3 04J03/2009 11:28:52AM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Dabe Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptJon/Account Amount I, the undersigned, do oe�tiry under penafty of pe�jury, that the materials hev�e been fumfshed, tfie services rendered, or the tabor perfom�ed as described herein and that the ciaim is Just, due and an unpaid obtigation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am autho�ized to suthenticate and certify to said daim. Finance Diret;tor Oate Page: 3 vchlist Voucher List Page 1 04J0312009 2:51:05PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptionlAccount Amount 16988 3/31/2009 000060 DENENNY, RICHARD Expenses 2008 TRAVEL EXPENSES 296.88 Total : 296.88 17011 4%?12009 000648 ABADAN 130301 PtJ�NS/SPECS #0076 79.02 Total : 79.02 17012 4/2/2009 001181 ACOSTA, CARRIE Expenses TRAVEL EXPENSES 7.29 Total : 7.29 17013 4/2/2009 001017 AVTECH SOFTWARE INC M009031438 42326 AVTECH TEMPAGER ANNUAL MAI� 155.00 Total : 155.00 17014 4/2/2009 001606 BANNER BANK 5579 MAR 09: GRIFFiTN 1,520.26 Total : 1,520.26 .�n� r . rn nn� nnn nrnv_n�_�c�c�r� � Gn/A?-.,�d� � - 'CVrI; rT o� � r v r � 7otal :�1ad �� 1701G 4/2/2009 001938 BERGER/ABAM ENGINEERS INC 14958 T1: Project Kick-Off • PI Plan� 4,859.06 Total : 4,859.06 17017 4/2�2009 000148 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORMS & EQUIP 731795 EMBLEM CHANGE: COSV PD 10.87 Total : 10.87 17018 4/2/2009 001937 BURAL, BLAKE Refund REFUND PERMIT FEES 195.00 Total : 195.00 17019 4/2/2009 000572 CARTER, CAROL Expenses TRAVEL EXPENSES 64.20 Total : 64.20 17020 4/'212009 000101 CDW-G NPM9851 42320 LAPTOP BATTERIES: BLDG 378.60 Total : 378.60 Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 04/03/2009 2:51:05PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Deacriptlon/Accourrt Amourrt � ' ' r1�d6 17022 4/2/2009 001943 CHOVGAN, ALINA Refund REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 205.00 Total : 205.00 17023 4/212009 000379 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY 06351 MAR 09: PETTY CASH REIMBURSE 4.86 06352 MAR 09: PETTY CASH REIMBURSE 2.80 06353 MAR 09: PETTY CASH REIMBURSE 8.15 06356 MAR 09: PETTY CASH REIMBURSE 0.50 Total : 16.31 17024 4l2/2009 000508 CONOCOPHILLIPS FLEET 870166725903 MAR 09: FLEET FUEL BILL 1,564.52 Total : 1,564.52 17025 4/2/2009 000035 CORPORATE IXPRESS 94061295 42312 KITCHEN SUPPLIES 158.18 Total : 158.18 ,�a ",''r•,A8 EL-�AN� T-A+`�►" "°�1isle-�Sbp�lie I�FO° �IdSK �,"-.�- Teta� : � ': .— � R Total :-60AQ-- , NB-BAM�GC-BEP°�'T �^ , •9- a 17029 4/2/2009 000735 FREEDMAN TUNG BOTTOMLEY 60660 SPRAGUE/APPLEWAY CORRIDOR: 153.01 Totai : 153.01 17030 4/2/2009 000715 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 019G06 SNACKS: PLANNING COMMISSION 66.27 Total : 66.27 17031 4/2/2009 000313 INl�4ND ASPHALT COMPANY INC. PMT #7 42102 PINES/MANSFIELD #0005 11 �640.00 Total : 11 �640.00 7�'A'2 �] I N'1 M1 MA � . a T�� • az.es. 17033 4/2/2009 001942 INTERMOUNTAIN BANK Refund REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 52.00 Page: 2 vchlist Voucher List Page 3 04/0312009 2:51:05PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptlonlAccount Amount 17033 412/2009 001942 001942 INTERMOUNTAIN BANK (Continued) Total : 52.00 N (} , Ppr o - A Tot�l • .2�^. ^^ • 9—OfJOZ65-�ACI�.SOAI ��a � IL.F�6� �,� T-0tai-: :,00- 17036 4/2/2009 000864 JUB ENGINEERS, INC. 0057566 41166 06-001 STREET MASTER PLAN 18,918.85 0057777 41409 06-001 ST MASTER PLAN NO. 2 8,297.33 Total : 27�216.18 a �►+^� .fa-Tt' ^a13�A E--�MBl�R�E-aIA�NT �n ; .�otal, -3sA0- . �.7 l�l��d��4Ll�lNESS-.�T-/�M WN E-BrRASl�lol�1-Rl�AT€S �if,� T�� 6,�i- 17039 4/?J2009 000193 NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC Apr 09 APR 09: RENT 36,417.94 Tobl : 36�417.94 v. � v wvv�v _ v n� w n�a �7 n�vL��pri�,c 1� w�- 294008775-001 e 40569 OFFICE SUPPLIES 191.72 467537976-001 V 1 OFFICE SUPPLIES 58.83 93-'�4. �1� OFFICE SUPPLIES 74.83 9786-U01 D CALENDAR: FINANCE .72 46762 8 467817952-001 42324 (NK OGE�G6ER�_ 110.79 17Q41 4/2J2009 001258 ORB ARCHITECTS INC. 19 41600 DESIGN OF POOL - TERRACE VEIV 1,014.94 19 41601 DESIGN OF POOL - VALLEY MISSIC 1,014.93 41601 Total : 2�029.87 17042 4/2/2009 001629 PPI GROUP 146915 TOPCON GPS UNIT 4,772.97 Total : 4�772.97 17043 4/2l2009 001276 RANDALL, DAV1D 1310 42210 STQRMWATER ANALYSIS 7,999.50 Page: 3 vchlist Voucher List Page: 4 04103/2009 2:51:05PM Spokane Valiey Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invotce PO # Description/Accour�t Amount 17043 4/?J2009 001276 001276 RANDALL. DAViD (Continuecn Total : 7,999.50 17044 4/2/2009 001874 RED DIAMOND CONSTRUCTION INC Retafnege RETAINAGE RELEASED #0068 24,385.19 Total : 24,385.19 � 17046 4/?J2009 001941 SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES W0068788RB GPS SUBSCRIPTION 1,800.00 Total : 1,900.00 17047 4/2l2009 00012fi SECRETARY OF STATE - WA Renewal COSV TRADEMARK RENEWAL 50.00 Total : 50.00 , 61A6-RefdR . � Tw�l . �� 17p49 4/1/2009 000172 SPOKANE CO ENGINEER VLY0902 FEB 09: ENGINEERING SERVICES 787,06520 Total : 787,065.20 17050 4/'1/2009 000090 SPOKANE CO INFO SYSTEMS 50303770 FEB 09: COUNTY (T SUPPORT 15,640.23 Total : 15�640.23 17051 4/2/2009 000658 SPOKANE CO SUPERIOR COURT Fling Fees YARDLEY BAR & GRILL COMPLAIf�f 200.00 Total : 200.00 �7AL°f w.Mf7M(�„�e ��TLTROf�7'l7dT Iir � / 1 " � ' � rfCT1`fl7T`CC�" h ,QC7A '1CtJIT.VO T�a..� . nn��— 17053 4/2/2009 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 41500869 JAN 09: GEIGER HOUSING 39,577.04 41500892 FEB 09: GEIGER HOUSING 39,193.40 Total : 78�770.40 17054 4/2l2009 000939 SPRAGUE & SULLIVAN MINISTORAGE 2nd Qtr 2009 2ND QUARTER 2009: 1 L46 369.00 58448 APR 09: RENT 1 P48 229.00 Total : 598.00 17055 4/2/2009 000311 SPRINT 326088106-016 MAR 09: WAP 549.89 959698810-016 MAR 09: CELL PHONES 933.42 Page: 4 vchlist Voucher List Page: 5 04/03/2009 2:51:05PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Dabe Vendor Invoice PO # Desc�iptloNAccount Amount 17055 4/?1Z009 000311 000311 SPRINT (Continue� Total: 1,483.31 1705fi 4/?J2009 001895 TAYLOR ENGINEERING INC 1 42278 SPRAGUE OVERIAY #0115 6,051.69 Total : 6�051.69 0 N6 nQ �a$/�34-Re#d . 0 T..�1 . e�n 17059 4/'2/2009 000964 VOLT 20250851 STAFFING SERVICE: IT 473.00 20292Q46 STAFFING SERVICE: fT 453.75 - Total: 926.75 tVS-6AMM NLl-9AMAGE--61E�SIT ��.A— -Iotai :, 50.00 � A M/7 CJGCJ - tri!'��YYY1Yb►�f�It `_'r'��•±±��-T-iA-T� °^fiil�d-61A�a(,� �t�l: �FOAO 330�90014 3r31/2009 001865 MORGEN 8 OSWOOD CONSTRUCTION PMT #5 �� 0 42219 BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION #0003 559,96324 Total : 559,9g3.24 401090010 4/112009 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER Mar 09 U�� r`e, MAR 09: SHERIFF SERViCES 1,159,935.16 Total : 1,159�935.16 54 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 2�T39�583.16 54 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 2,739�583.16 '1 �, � � . Q�„ � o� ��13�. �' 2� . l O Page: 5 vchlist Vouchet List Page 6 04l03/2009 2:51:05PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO �t Desc�ptloNAccount Amount I, the underaigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the aervic:es rendered, or the labor performed as deacribed herein and that the claim ie just, due and an unpaid obligation againBt the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certifv said claim . Finance Director Da� Mayor Date Council Member l�a� Page: 6 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 414-09 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: � consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public h2aring ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Payroll for Period Ending March 31, 2009 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: OPTfONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS Gross: $ 235,313.10 Benefits: $ 128.660.06 TOT�^ �'AY�= �! � �6 � °��.' h STAFF CONTACT. Raba N;�,�r� ATTACNMENTS CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: April 14, 2009 City Manager Sign-off: Item Check all that apply: � consent ❑ o(d business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of Department of Licensing Interlocal Agreement GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: On June 1, 2004, Council agreed to move forward with the Department of Licensing (DOL) Master License Service (MLS) handling our business registrations; and an Interlocal Agreement between the State of Washington Department of Licensing and the City of Spokane Valley was signed by our City Manager October 12, 2004. That agreement expires June 30, 2009, and the Department of Licensing has prepared a nevv Interlocal Agreement for Council consideration, which agreement has been reviewed by our legal department. There was Council consensus at the April 7 meeting, to place this item on the April 14 consent agenda. BACKGROUND: The Governor's office directed MLS to offer its services to local governmcnts as well as state agencies in order to make business licensing simpler. Through this servicE . new business applicants can register their business and handle most of their state licenses or�� line with just one application form and an addendum. MLS charges a$9.00 handling fee for each renewal that covers a period of twelve months or more; and our City Business Registration fee is $13.00 for general businesses, and $3.00 for non-profit organizations. The new interlocal agreement term runs July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2014. The formE- contract states that we would establish a limited-service Washington State Un�ed Busine� �: Identifier (UBI) program field office and issue UBI numbers when appropriate. MLS now doe:> that exclusively. The former contract listed Ken Thompson as the contract coordinator, the ne�� contract lists the City Clerk as the con±ract m�rlagA� with in�ro�ces to be sent direct�y to o�t,r Fin�:nce Dcp��ment A�co�cn±s F'��bl� OPTI�?N�: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Approve the "Interlocal Agreement between the State of Washington Department of Licensing and the City of Spokane Valley" and authorize the City Manager or his designee to sign the Interlocal. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: Chris Bainbridge ATTACHMENTS: DOL MLS — City Partnership Agreement No. K1236 INTERLOCALAGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON - DEPARMENT OF LICENSING � AND THE CfTY OF SPOKANE VALLEY This Agreement is made and entered into by and between the State of Washington Departrnent of Licensing, hereinafter referred to as "DOL," and the City of Spokane Valley, hereinafter referred to as "the City.' DOL and the City enter into this Agreement pursuant to the authority granted by Chapter 39.34 RCW and Chapter 19.02 RCW. PURPOSE It is the purpose of this Agreement to authorize the DOL Master License Service, (hereinafter referred to as "MLS°), to act as the City's agent for business licensing activities, and to ensure that the City retains its full, lawful, regulatory and approval authority over afl business licensing activities within its jurisdiction. This Agreeme�t may also be referred to as a'MLS City Partnership Agreement'. This Agreement replaces that earlier Agreement between DOL and the City identified by DOL as 05/7360 and signed by the City on October 12, 2004. THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED THAT: DEFINI TlONS As used throughout this Agreement, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below: `ConFdentia! lnforma6on" shall mean information that may be exempt from disclosure to the public or . other unauthorized persons under either chapter 42.17 RCW or other state or federal statutes. Confidential Information includes, but is not limited to, Personal Information, agency source code or object code, and agency security data. 'Parfner" shall mean any city entering into a MLS City Partnership Agreement with DOL. 'Personal Intormation,' shall mean infonnation identifiable to any person, including, but not limited to, information that retates to a person's name, heafth, finances, education, business, use or receipt of govemmental services or other activities, addresses, tefephone numbers, social security numbers, driver license numbers, e-mail addresses, credit card information, law enforcement records, financial identifiers, and other information that may be exempt from disclosure to the public or other unauthorized persons under either RCW 42.56 or other state and federal statutes. 'RCW shall mean the Revised Code of Washington. °Subconfracto�" shall mean one �ot in the employment of a party to this Agreement, who is perForming all or part of those services under this Agreement under a separate contract with a party to this Agreement. The terms "Third Pari}!' and "Agents° in this Agreement includes subcontractors STATEMENT OF WORK The parties to this Agreement shall fumish the necessary personnel, equipment, material and/or service(s) and othenNise do all things necessary for or incidental to the exchange of data as set forth in the Stafemenf of Worfc, Attachment A attached hereto and incorporated herein. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE Subject to its other provisions and regardless of the date of signature, the period of performance ofi this Agreement will begin on July 1, 2009 and end on June 30, 2014, unless terminated or extended sooner as provided herein. COMPENSATlON Services identified in this Agreement are provided by DOL at no charge with the exception of the following: File Name: K1236.do� Page 1 oi 6 Printed: 3/23l2009 DOL MLS — City Partnership Agreement No. K1236 The City agrees to reimburse DOL for any fees charged by financial institutions and/or credit card processors to handle the City's ficense fees collected by credit card and/or other electronic means, for the internet filing process of the City's licensees. The City agrees to reimburse DOL the costs of developing and producing ad hoc informational reports if reports are requested by the City and agreed-upon by DOL. The City shall reimburse DOL expenses for the implementation of changes to the MLS process, if requested by the City and agreed-upon by DOL. All project coordination costs, including travel-related expenses, shall be absorbed by the respective parties for their own staff. BILLING PROCEDURES DOL shall submit any invoices as-needed, but in no event more often than monthly. Invoices shall be sent to the attention of Finance Department Accounts Payable at City of Spokane Valley; 11707 East Sprague Avenue� Suite 106; Spokane Valley� WA 99206-6110. Payment to DOL shall be made by warrant or account transfer by the City within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of the invoice. Upon expiration of this Agreement, any c(aim for payment not already made shall be submitted within ninety (90) calendar days after the expiration date or the end of the fiscal year, whichever is earlier. RECORDS MAINTEIVANCE The parties to this Agneemeht shall each maintain books, records, documents and other evidence which sufficiently and properly reflect all direct and indirect costs expended by either party in the performance of the service(s) described herein. These records shall be subject to inspection, review or audit by personnel of each party, other personnel dufy authorized by either party, the Office of the State Auditor, and federal officials so authorized by law. Unless otherwise agr�eed, all books, records, documents, and other material � celevant to this Agreement will be retained for six years after expiration and the Office of the State Auditor, federal auditors, DOL Intemal Auditors, and any persons dufy authorized by the parties shall have full access � and the right to examine any of these materials during this period. Records and other documents, in any medium, fumished by one party to this Agreement to the other party, will remain the property of the fumishing party, unless otherwise agreed. The receiving party will not disclose or make available this material to any third parties without first giving notice to the fumishing party and giving it a reasonable opportunity to respond. Each party will utilize reasonable security procedures and protections to assure that records and documents provided by the other party are not erroneously disclosed to third parties. CONFIDENTIALITY DOL maintains data that is required or shared by multiple regulatory agencies and other jurisdictions. This data is subject to various public disclosure laws regulating its protection and dissemination to third pa�ties. In particular, much of the Master Application information may not be disclosed under RCW 82.32.330, RCW 51.16.070 and RCW 50.13.020. The Parties agree that all data provided or shared under this Agreement shall be governed by the public disclosure laws of the Department of Revenue, the Department of Labor and Industries, the Depa�tment of Employment Security and the Office of the Secretary of State. Information determined to be subject to public disclosure is written in the Washington State UBI Policies and Procedures Manual (http:lldor.wa.qov/Docs/Pubs/UBl/UBlmanualComplete.pdfl. The City's public disclosure laws shall also apply. All requests to City or DOL for public information of data collected by DOL's Master License Service shall be guided by these laws and policies. 1NDEPENDENT CAPACITY The employees or agents of each party who are engaged in the performance of this Agreement shall continue to be employees or agents of that party and shall not be considered for any purpose to be employees or agents of the other party. AGREEMENT ALTERATIONS AND AMENDMEIVTS This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement of the parties. Such am�ndments shall not be binding unless they are in writing and signed by personnel authorized to bind each of the parties. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) Instructions that either Contract Manager determines to address more than day-to-day concerns, but which do not modify the terms of this contract, shall be documented by a writ�en, numbered Memorandum of Undersfanding. Fi1e Name: K1236.doc Page 2 of 6 Printed: 3/23/2009 DOL MLS — City Partnership Agreemen► N�. K1236 TERMIIVA T10N . Either party may terminate this Agreement upon ninety (90) calendar days' prior written notification to the other party. If this Agreement is so terminated, the parties shall be liable onfy for performance rendered in accordance with the terms of this Agreement prior to the effective date of termination. TERMINATION FOR CAUSE , ff for any cause, either party does not fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Agreement, or if either parly violates any of these terms and conditions, the aggrieved party will give the other party written notice of such failure or violation. The r�esponsible party will be given the opportunity to correct the violation or failure within fifteen (15) business days. If the failure or violation is not corrected, this Agr�eement may be terminated immediately by written notice of the aggrieved party to the other. D/SPUTES In the event that a dispute arises under this AgreEment, it shall be determined by a Dispute Board in the following manner. Each party to this Agreement shall appoint one member to the Dispute Board. The members so appointed shall jointty appoint two additional members to the Dispute Board. The Dispute Board shall review the facts, Agreement terms, and applicable statutes and rules and make a determination of the dispute. The determination of the Dispute Board shall be final and binding on the parties hereto. As an aftemative to this process, any of the parties may request intervention by the Govemor, as provided by RCW 43.17.330, in which event the Govemo�s process will control. GOVERNANCE This Agreement is entered inio pursuant to and under the authority granted by the laws of the state of Washington and any applicable federal laws. The provisions of this Agreement shall be construed to conform to those laws. In the event of an inconsistency in the terms of this Agreement, or between its terms and any applicable statute or rule, the inconsistency shall be resolved by giving precedence in the following order. 1. Applicab{e state and federal statutes and rules; 2. The terms of this Agreement; 3. Statement of Work, Attachment A; and 4. Any other provisions of the Agreement, including materials incorporated by reference. ASSlGNMENT The work to be provided under this Agreement, and any claim arising from it, is not assignable or delegable by any party in whole or in part, without the express prior written consent of the other parties. WAl VER A failure by any party to exercise its rights under this Agreement shall not preclude that party from subsequent exercfse of such rights and shall not constitute a waiver of any other rights under this Agreement unless stated to be such in a writing signed by personnel authorized to bind the party and attached to the - original Agreement. RIGHTS OF INSPECTION Each party shall provide right of access to the othe� party, or any of its officers, or to any other authorized agent or official of the state of Washington or the federal govemment at all reasonable times, in order to monitor and evaluate performance, compliance, and/or quality assurance of intemal policies and procedures, and/or records relating to the safeguarding, use, and disclosure of Confidential Information obtained or used as a result of this Agreement. Each party shall make available information necessary for the other party to comply with public's right to access, amend, and receive an accounting of any disclosure of their Confidential Information. SUBCONTRACTING With prior written consent, any party may enter into subcontracts for any of the work or secvices contemplated unde� this Agreement. Consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. The party issuing the subcontract is responsible for ensuring that all terms, conditions, assurances and certifications set forth in this Agreement are carried forward to any subcontracts. SEVERABIUTY If any provision of this Agreement or any provision of any document incorporated by reference shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions of this Agreement that can be given effect without the invalid provision, if such remainder confonns to the requirements of applicable law and the fundamental purpose of this Agreement. To this end the provisions of this Agreement are declared to be severable. Fle Narne� K1236.doc Page 3 of 6 Printed: 3123�2009 DOL MLS — City Partnership Agreement No: K1236 CONTRACT MANAGEMENT The Contract Manager for each of the parties shall be responsible for and shall be the contact person for all communications regarding the performance of this Agreement. The Contract Mana er for the Ci is: The Contract Mana er for DOL is: Christine Bainbridge Maria Moore City Clerk Master license Service City of Spokane Valley Department of Licensing 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106 PO Box 9034 Spokane Valley, Washington 99206-6110 Olympia, Washington 98507-9034 Phone: 360-664-1419 Phone: 509-688-0177 Fax: 360-570-7875 Emai(: cbainbridQe(a�spokanevallev.orq Email: mmooreC�dol.wa.4ov ALL WRlTINGS CONTAlNED NEREIN This Agreement contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. No other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement. City of Spokane Valley State of Washington Department of Licensing (Signature) Date Julie Knittle Date Contract Officer . (Name & Trtle) - Appraved as to Form (K936) Signaturo On File 1/13/09 Jera/d Anderson, A.4G Date File Name� K1236 dcc Page 4 cf 6 Printe�: 3.�23,'2009 DOL f��1LS - Ci�� Pa�r�ers�,lp Agre�m��,t No K1236 ATTACHMENT � STATEMENT OF WORK The City Shal1: Agreeto theexc��s��c uS� ui �I1� I`��:�i�l r'��}��i�;Uiiuli ai�J c�ily f�;��iicu c:uJe�i�iud i�i i� N�Oi;:;S� G( applying for a City business license, and the exclusive use of the "MLS Licenses and Registrations` document for proof of City business licensure. If additional fomns are identified as necessary for the processing of City licensee accounts, their design, creation, or collection will be a cooperative effort between DOL and the City. Agree to the exclusive use of the Un�ed Business Identifier (UBI) number in conjunction with the physical location identification number used by DOL in the ident�cation of licensees and license accounts in all communications with DOL. Maintain remote on-line inquiry and update access to the MLS Database. End-to-end testing will take place until such time as DOL is satisfied. Accept responsibility for payment of all equipment, connection, access and maintenance charges related to the City's access into and use of the MLS Database. Accommodate requirements for Master Application forms regardless of whether the transaction involves a City business license. Ensure the timety availability to DOL of City Licensing and Information Technology staff. Staff will be knowledgeable of City operations and/or technology and be able to assist DOL staff with process improvements and/or troubleshooting. Use commonty accepted security procedures to ensure that confidential information is not improperly disclosed. Provide advance notice to DOL of potential changes to City business licensing requirements, fees or processes to allow DOL the timely implementation of changes into any electronic or automated systems or procedures related to the administration of City's business licensing. Upon request by DOL, provide statistical data associated with the MlS City Partnership Agreement such , as Full Time Equivalent (FTE) savings, change in number of City licensees, and change in revenue flow. DOL Shall: Create, produce, issue, accept, and process new and renewal applications for City business licenses. In doing so, DOL will collect, process and disburse the respective City business license fees and licensing information received from applicants and licensees. Issue licensing documents (Master Licenses) for City business licensees. Maintain and update the MLS Database to the best of its ability. DOL shall not be responsible for system down time or other delays to the receipt of infvrmation or emors in the compilation of such information. Provide informational reports to the City of the City's business licensees. City staff will determine which reports best suit their needs and the frequency that reports are required. Reports may include but are not limited to: daily lists of new business applications and renewals, fees processed each day, weekly list of pending accounts, and lists of businesses for which fees have been transferred. Provide services through Intemet-based or paper-based licensing processes, depending on .the needs of the City and the capabilit�r of DOL. Design and implement mod�ca�ons to the MLS Database and establish any related procedures and forms. Provide technical assistance in establishing and configuring appropriate MLS Database access and ensuring security of access for City staff. Provide training to City staff in the use of the MLS Database upon execution of Agreement. Provide ongoing training to accommodate system or staff changes. Training will be provided onsite at City location or via interneUtelephone, as agreed between both patties. Flle Name: K1236.doc Page 5 of 6 P�inted: 3�2312009 Ak?achment A, Statem?nt of �tif�rk DOL MLS — City Partnership Agreement No. K1236 Notify the City of any changes anticipated to MLS processes or services as they become known, and mitigate the impacts that such changes may have upon the services provided. Prepare any required computer system change request in coordination with the City, and place the request in a prioritized work queue for timely completion. DOL staff will be mindful of potential impacts to DOL and City Partners as a result of any proposed changes to the MLS process. DOL will assist City Partners in considering possible alternatives and determining the most feasible means of achieving the objective of a proposed change. DOL will review the proposed change with all City Partners potentially impacted and will attempt to reach consensus among all affected parties. Microfilm or electronically image all paper documents submitted and maintain electronic representations of all filings completed via the Intemet. DOL shall not maintain paper copies. The City will have access to information filed with DOL on paper or via the Intemet through electronic access to the MLS Database. If the City requires a paper document, DOL will produce a copy from microfilm or electronic record. The copy will be certified, if required by the City. File Narne: K1236.doc Page 6 of 6 Prinie�� 3r23�'20D9 Attachment A, Statement of Woric DRAFT MINUTES City of Spokane Valley City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, March 24, 2009 �1:!�i)1 1�[!!i>ilIl ��1��.'�� (flt' iil��ll;l< t�� :'i�t��'f' :ll �:nn �?.ili. ;:1':f� `,��Ci�111�i.i �\"�i"�� t�� t�IC 1�(�1�� il!t�I111". .-1u�.°�tclu�rrc�• C'itt� S'tr�(f: Rich Munson, Mayor Mike Jackson, Deputy City Mana�� r Dick Denenny, Deputy Mayor Mike Connelly, City Attorney Rose Dempsey, Councilmember Ken Thompson, Finance Direct� Bill Gothmann, Councilmember Scott Kuhta, Senior Planner Gary Schimmels, Councilmember Neil Kersten, Public Works Dire�tt�� Steve Taylor, Councilmember Rick VanLeuven, Police Chief Diana Wilhite, Councilmember Karen Kendall, Associate Plann�� Steve Worley, Senior Engine� �- Mike Stone, Parks & Recreati��n I>ic�.:.t.�: Greg McCormick, Planning Manager John Whitehead, Human Resources l�' : � � � � �. � � : Carolbelle Branch, Publ ic I � � �� ; „:: � � � _ � � �, � � i i ` � � Chris Bainbrid�e. Citti• Clt � �. -„ IN�' +'-�:�'_,. � ._ ,�1:.� ��.. �_1 �T�I� . .. _ 11, ;�. _:,.�;� PLI�:Ut�� i}1�� :�l_.L1�;t 1.�� [.� . � 1 , � ,,,_,_� . .. . `, . ..�. , .. 7 1 1JL�� ll.l��ll 1/.:i lU � �: '��i�- I��i ��. t�i�' �' �'I . ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called roll; all Councilmembers �� r�:.�: �: APPROVAL OF AGENDA: It wns 7)Tn� hi C�(JZO1Cljn?('l)"1�E'l' TC71 �lor, .cc�� >�,�� ,. .;-��:.,�:��j��:��!`� ngreed to approve 1he amended agencl< r I'�'TR(�I�l'C'TIOV OF SI'ECI:1I. (:l' f��.�"I'S A� I) Y1tl:�L��"f�:��I t( )titi: �� CO11111�1�"l�El�;. 13O:�ltll. LL�,1SO` �C'1Ii�1:1K�►� IZI:}'c=)RTti: Councilmernber Schimmels: no report Councilmember Wilhite: reported she attended il�e �pu1..�u�� ►:��;�i��►�,I I►.�,1>E��;t:►t:�_�� c��u�n��tii,�� meeting where they discussed their bylaws and how their organization is operated; attendcd Commissioner Mielke's State of the County report; attended the Mayor's Ball; attended the National I.eague of Cities (NLC) Conference in Washington, D.C. and while there attended the Transportatic�n Infrastructure and Services Policy and Advocacy Committee Meeting where she heard an update on th� economic recovery package regarding transportation, and that she had an opportunity to attend a meetin� hosted by Senator Murray, as well as meetings with Senator Cantwell on proposed legislation fra� �� Congress. Councilmember Taylor: explained that he also attended the NLC session in Washington, D.C. with Councilmember Gothmann and Wilhite; attended the board retreat for the Convention and Visitor's Bureau where they discussed their five-year plan and the stability of funding including lodgin� ta� is�ues: and that he attended the Mayor's Ball. Councilmember Gothmann: reported that he accompanied a health inspector inspecting a restaurant and he was very impressed with the inspection and explanation of concerns; attended a Housing anci Community Development Advisory Committee meeting and he mentioned the American Recovery and Re-im��stment Act grant and its extensive reporting requirements, and that the committee granted awards Council Regular Meeting: 03-2�3-2009 Pag� l of 1 I Approved by Council: DRA FT to fund a neighborhood stabilization program which is a program �vhere they buy foreclosed tioRies and use those for low-cost housing; mentioned the National League (NLC) of Cities session on relations between a City Manager and a Council; and while at the NLC meeting atte�ded a strategic planning meeting where they were greeted by our area legislators; and said he also atte�ded the Mayor's Ball. Deputy Mayor DenennX: mentioned that he has been involved in Health Board activities this week including an executive session where they interviewed a candidate, and said they feel the offer wiil be accepted; that he met with Commissioner Richard to go over speciFcs on contracts; attended a Spokane Transit Authority (STA) meeting and mentioned they will be in receipt of approximately $10 million to use for enhanced capital acquisitions, including the possibility of purchasing hybrid buses; adding that the STf1 does not have any indebtedness nor does it bond; and said that the fare issue is scheduled far an April 16 public hearing. Councilmember Dempseti�: stated that she attencfed the State of the County address; a luncheon sponsored by the Internatianal Trade Association; and attended two presentations on community agencies eager to develop community service projects; attended the Greater Spokane, Inc. leadership reception; and a town meeting at CenterPlace with Senator McCaslin and Representatives Crouse and Shea. MAYOR'S REPORT: Mayor Munson reported he attended a breakfast meeting concerning the Commute Trip Reduction program and said it was interesting to hear how most businesses are trying to implement a plan to reduce the number of trips people take; that he gave an abbreviated version of his State of the City address to the Building Owners and Managers Association; he met with Mike Fitzsimmons and discussed various subjects; met �vith some boy scouts working on their community service merit badge; attended a Washington State Advisory Board meeting for the Spokane Campus, with an exercise on the vision for WSU ten years from now; attended the STA meeting; the Mayor's Ball; the Association of Washington Cities Executive meeting to discuss issues such as the upcoming budget; attended a graduation ceremony for the local drug court; and spoke at the leadership meeting at the MAC sponsored by Intermountain Bank. Councilmember Taylor added that John Fisher at Communin� Framework received an approximate $500,000 award from CTED (Community Trade and Economic Development) to construct properties so families �vith lower income will have the abiliry to purchase a home; and Mayor Munson remarked ttiat this morning he attended a meeting where the prospect of having a May election was discussed, which would include a ballut proposition for the l/l0 of 1% sales tax for public safen�. Mayor Munson then read nvo proclamations: "Financial �ducation Week"; followed by a proclamation for "Parliamentary Law Month," which was received by Ms. Robbie Jackson, President of the local group which meets at the Spokane Valley Library. PUBLIC COM1ViENTS: Mayor Munson invited general public comment. Trov Diliev, 2400 N Wilbur Road; Vallcy 206 Apartments: expressed his than�:s for how beautiful Mansfield looks; but said he wanted to know how traffic could be better controlled at Spaulding wwhere people drag cace; and said asked the purpose of the traffic light at Yokes. Ma� Mtmson said that staf would contact him to address those questions and concerns. l. CONSENT AGF.ND 4: Consists of items considered routine �vhich are approved as a group. A Councilmember may remove an item from the Consent Agenda to be consid�red separately. a. Claim Vouchers, Voucher # 16800 through # 16900; $1,296,586.58 b. Payroll for pay period ending March 15, 2009: $251,227.95 c. Approval of Regular Council Meeting Minutes of February 24, 2009 d. Approval of Council Study Session Minutes of March 3, 2009 e. Approval of Regular Council Meeting Minutes of March 10, 2009 It was moved b�� Councilmember Tny�lor, secotlded, and turanimo:�sly agreed tn approve 1he consenf agendci. Council ttegular 1�-lccting: 03-24-2009 Pa�e ? of 11 A}�Prov by CounciL• � DR-�TT NEW BUSINESS: 2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 09-003 Amending SVMC 9.05 Regarding Speed Limits — Neil Kersten/Inga Note After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Councilmember Taylor and seconded to approve Ordinance 09-00.3 a»rending Spokane Valley Municipal Code relating to speed limits. Public Works Director Kersten said this is more of a housekeeping item; that the ordinance changes the code to allow a resolution which states the speed limits, which resolution is coming up later on tonight's agenda; and added that the code also gives the traffic engineer the authority to temporaril�� reduce speed limits in construction zones. Mayor Munson invited public comment; no comments �vere offered. t 'v�e f?�' ;�lcc 'llll)I[!IlUIJ.' I)1 1�'cn•or: t %11c7T17))IOIIS. D��►USc'(I.' )IUIIE'. .�hS"IE'JIIIUII.S: :� '�»r�.�. !lfr�trn�! CC"I!'I'1('ij. �. First headins� Proposed Urdinance 09-00� Airport Overla�� — karen Kendall After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinanee title, it was moti►ed by Cuu�ic-il��i��,rb�r• 7c��lo�� a»cr' seconded to advance Ordinance 09-OOS to a second readtng. Planner Kendall explained that thi� ordinance amends the density limitations within Zone 6 of the airport hazard overlay to allow the underlying zone to follow specific criteria as listed. Councilmember Gothmann said that the letter fro�>> the Airport Director mentions that according to RCW 36.70.547, we are out of compliance because v�� haven't consulted with the state aviation division, and said he feels we aeed to make allowance for th�3t essential public facility, and he questioned whether we have done that, and if not, agrees we are not i�� compliance with the intent or the letter of the mentioned statute, and he had copies of the statut�� distributed to Council and staff. Mayor Munson asked Mr. Connelly if he feels we have done everythin;�. in accordance with the Law. City Attorney Connelly said that is a question he'd like some time t� � respond to in writing, and would have preferred to have had some notice this was going to be raised; b��; feels we are generally in compliance; that the statute does not require a specific outcome b«� consideration is required, which he said, is in the record; and added that he should be able to have th�:t information prior to the second reading. Ms. Kendall said there were some incidences where they m<i with representatives on behalf of Spokane International Airport in consultation, and that she previouslti met with Carter Timmerman from WSDOT Aviation prior to the public hearing, and met with Ry��>> Sheehan, representative of Spol:ane International Airport prior to the public hearing; and during tl�� public hearing she and Mr. McCormick met with Mr. Sheehan and there were no furiher cc,rl��ncnt: t'r��r» Spokane International as a result of that meeting. Mayor Munson invited puhlic c��n�►ncnt. Tanya Chesnut and Steve Blanford, 3204 E. Rivercrest Post Falls, Idaho:_ she explained that thc� purchased some property at 7524 E Buckeye in 1990, that it consists of a large lot with a small house on one side; that they had a market analysis done and when the property was appraised, it was done as two pieces of propert}�: the house and the open lot; she feels that since they have a lot of frieods out of work, now is the time to build as lumber is cheap; she said she is in the process of splitting the lot; they hired a builder; and when they came to the City of Spokane Valley, they were told they needed to get plans; they hired someone to draft plans for a house, and when they brought the plans in they discovered this issue was in progress; and said she was told about this meeting by someone at the Water Department; she explained that the sewer and �vater connections are already in; and she is in favor of the plan whereby if those utilities are hooked up, they shoulc� be able to build. Carter Timmerman, representing WSDOT Aviation Division, 3704 172 Street NL Arlington. V`'a. 98223: he explained that his role is to advocate for safe air transportation, and the preservation of aviation sites; with an objective to ensure viability for the State and the citizens; that the GMA was ameoded to require cities and counties to protect airport development; that he is engaged in the long-term aviation Study; and trends have discovered that aviation is a growing mode of transportation; that airports are becoming more important, and it is therefore important to understand development problems and it is better to plan proactively; and that regarding the overlay zone 6, he recommends that Spokane Valle� rcconsider Council Re�ul:jr ?�Ic�liri�: 0;-2•l-2i)O�� Na�e � �f I I Appr�vcd by Council: DRAFT adoption of option 4; and also recommends that coLincil pursue the mixed use instead of single family residential; or only allow option 4 for part and use Utah as part of the divider. In response to Council question, Mr. Timmerman said he will get council a copy of his written statements. Naocy Holmes. 5412 N St James Place: said she is a member of the Spokane Airport 'I�enants' Association at Felts Field, that the organization includes 130 tenants and their mission is to protect and promote the viability of Felts Field as an important community asset; she said she testified at the Planning Commission hearing; that she appreciates the time spent evaluating everything; and appreciates WSDOT and Spokane International Airport's concern, and said she believes any future development is not in the best interest of the land use compatibility around the airport; that at the Planning Commission meeting it became clear citizens have invested funds and now can't develop property; and she stated the Association would be willing to support option 4 as a compromise solution; and said she feels the issue is not of enough magnitude to influence Felts Field in the future; adding that she will pay attention to future issues, but she is learning loward supporting option #4. As a means of disclosure, Deputy Mayor Denenny announced he is a member of that organization as well. James Baur, 2410 N Cherry Street, Spokane Valley: explained that lie is a private pilot flying mostly out of relts Field; that he wanted to make sure Council was aware of an issue he brought up at the Planning Commission concerning noise; that he realizes not everything is in a high noise area; and chances are it won't affect that much; but he asked council to make sure the zoning ordinance says what they want it to and not to allow high density housing by a loophole in thc ordinance; and to make sure high density housing cannot happen, adding that people �yill complain about the noise regardless of any documents. John Townsle,y� 607 W Montgomery Avenue: said that he is a hanger ow and a pilot; that he recently moved to the area; said that one of the businesses here wants to fly any time of the day or night as they do medical evacuations; said Council's decision will affect many and said that all medical evacuations come here; he asked Council to be careful in decisions that might in any way make it more difficult for d�e life- saving aircraft to operate to and from the field. Mark Jucht Deputy Director with Spokane Airport; said tl�at the airport influence rone exlends far beyond the property line; that he supporls Timmerman's proposal, but asked Council to be carefi�l with any of tiie `'ors" in thc dc►cument. C011I1Cl� C�lSCL1SS10I1 IIICIlldEd COI11Il1e(lI fl'0111 C^OUIIClII11C[ll�)�f I ay that he believes the compromise ��itl� option #4 addresses everyone's goals; he read the staf�report that we will allow those certain properties to proceed; that staff concludes this option is in accordance with the GME1, and he disputes that this will cause the inevitabie closing of Felts Field as if that were the case, he would vote against it. Councilmember Taylor also stated that he feels the appropriate notifications and safeguards are in to protect the field with negligible impact. Deputy Mayor Denenny said that he will examine the compromise offered by staff and will further review the prohibited uses as shown in the ordinance, and will reconsider this when it comes again for a second reading, and said he would like the information from Mr. Connelly regarding the RCW brought forth by Councilmember Gothmann. Councilmember Gothmann said the aviation department offered technical assistance to develop something that could be positive for everyone, and he feels that assistance hasn't been received yet as Mr. Timmerman's proposal was just given tonight; that he doesn't want a situation where the aviation community or the development community feels slighted, and he would e�courage staff to sit down with WSUOT Aviation and request some technical assistance from them as they are anxious to keep the airport viable while at the same time want to meet the needs of residents, and said it is possible to do those things between now and the second reading. Councilmember Schimmels said he is inclined to sit on this until all information is in as ther� arc te�o many questions out there; and he ��ould like rn�re data and meetin�` �ti ith ��`S[)C)T if nece�san�. Council Itcgi�lar hlccting: 03-2�1-?UU�) Paic; 4 of I 1 Approved by C;�uncil: DRAFT Councilmember Dempsey said she feels ther� is a need to pay more attention to the entities that have asked us not to do this, mentioned the r�ecent Montana air crash, and said she cannot support this. Councilmember Wilhite stated that she has been invalved with economic development and understands the importance of airports to the cotnmunity, and the eeonomic stimulus they can bring; mentioned we are getting more private traffic here and development arou�d ihe field, that there have been a nurnber of� people who were planning to develop and brought in sewer and water, made a substantial financial commitment; that she looked at the number of lots that have this sewer and water and the number of potential lots that could be developed was not of great enough density to impair being around the airport; that it all had to have been done by a date certain, that ttiey won't allow high rise development and won't be caught short and that she is cognizant of the needed regulations for density, and supports this as a compromise. Councilmember Taylor added that we have been working on this issue for a long time, perhaps a year; that the Planning Commission held open public comment after initial hearings to allo�� more time for WSDOT Aviation and SIA (Spokane International Airport) to make comments on this change and such comments were noted by the Planning Commission, Council and staff, and he added that while the airport or WSDOT Aviation can make recommendations, it is Couocil who makes the policy and will have to deal with GMA and their broad thirteen goals; that he realizes council should not make policy based on the comments of a few, but hopefully have comments from many, and he feels that process has occurred and doesn't need to be further elongated. Mayor Munson said that this issue does not deal with a great number of homes, perhaps 224 lots; and out of several thousand homes, if noise is a factor it would be so for those existing homes and another 200 homes tivon't make a big difference; and said he is disappointed with State's last minute testimony, that they bad over a year to comment, but he appreciates the comments tonight and �vill review that proposal, and if needed could delay the second reading to get those written comments and Mr. Connelly's information. Councilmember Gothmann requested that prior to the second reading, the City Manager request staff to contact W'SDOT Aviation and request that technical assistance, and to bring that report back at the second reading. Mr. Connell}� and Ms. Kendall both voiced their opinion they could get the needed information for the April 7 second reading; including the request that staff not need a technical review of the entire ordinance, just what's been addressed tonight. Vote by Acclamation to advance ordinance 09-OOS to a second reading: Irr Favor: Mayor Murrson, Deputy Mayor Denenrry, a�d Councilmembers Schimmels, Tcr��lor, Gntfrnt�nrt, artd Wilhite. npposed: Councilntember Dempsey. Ah,stertttons: 1�'one. �llotio�r ccrrriecl. In t6e interest ot Nme, and because Mrs. Olson had to leave early, Mayor Munson invited Mrs. Ulson to the podium to discuss legislative issues. 1�7rs. Olson, Eastem Washington Director for Senator Patt�� Murray, explained that she is responsible for bei.ng Senator Murray's eyes and ears in all of eastern Washington; she said that Senator Murray is no�v in her third term as Senator, she serves on the Senate Appropriations Committ� and several sub-committees; and chairs ihe Transportation sub-committee; that transpoctation issues are many and Mrs. Olson said it is her responsibility to be familiar with transportation and other appropriations projects in order to keep the Senator updated on needs requests and progress. She mentioned several other committees that Senator Murray is involved with, and said that the Senator strives daily to use her position to forward the �eeds of Washington State citizens; that she comes back to the state every week; her husband stil) resides in Seattle, and there are very few weekends that she doesn't make that trip; that this is a busy year so far especially in light of the stimulus package, which Senator Murray voted for; that the Senator feels it is not perfect, but feels our economy needs the boost; that we didn't get into this situation rapidly, and likely this won't resolve rapidly. Mrs. Olson stated that the omnibus appropriations bill to run our Federal Government for Fiscal Year 2009 i� funded through the end of September; that the President has submitted a beginning budget and the Senate and Congress are working on that ongoing process, which they would like to have completed by September 30. Mrs. Olson also mentioned that this last week Senator Murray introduced legislation dealing with women veterans' beiiefits, and ended by stating that they are here to assist and can be Council Regular Mettin�� 0?-2-1-2(l09 Pa�e S �f 1 1 Approved by Council: DRA FT contacted via e-mail or phooe by calling 509-624-9� 1 �. Mayor Munson ex�ressed his hope to continue this type of report on a quarterly basis; and he thanked the local legislators for comin� to tlie council meeting. Mayor Munson called for a recess at 7:40 p.m.; and reconvened the meeting at 7:48 p.m. 4. First Reading Proposed Ordinance 09-006 Amendin� 08-012 zoning map changes — Greg McCormick After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Councilmember Taylor and seconded to suspend the rules and c�dopl Ordinarrce 09-006. Planning Manager McCormick explained that he became aware of an inconsistency between adopted goals and policies in the comprehensive plan and provisions in the Code; that staff included an itern on the 2008 comprehensive plan docket to address the situation and processed this item under file CPA 10-08; and with the adoption of ordinance 08-012, the amended Appendix 19-A was erroneously attached to ordinance 08-011, which amended the comp plan rather tfian the Ordinance that amended the city's official zoning map; therefore, Appendix 19-A was never officially amended. Mayor Munson iovited public comment; no comments were offered. �ote b�l Accla»tation: In Favor: U�ra�rirrrous. Opposed: None. Abslerrtiorrs: None. Motion carried 5. Proposed Resolution 09-004, Master Speed Limit Schedule — Neil Kersten�In ag Note After City Clerk Bainbridge read the resolution title, it was moved by Cou�rcilmember Taylor a»d seconded to approve Resolution 09-004 adopting a Master Speed Limit Schedule. Public Works Director Kersten explained that this is the resolution referred to under tonight's agenda item #2, that the resolution details of the locations of all the speed zo�es throughout the city; and adds two ne�ti� areas concerning Greenacres Elementary and University Elementary. Mayor Munson invited public comment; no comments were offered. Y'ote by Acclamntion: In Favor: Urranimous. Oppose�i: No�:e. �Ibste�rtior:s: None. Motion carriecl. 6. Motion Consideration: Presentation/City Hall Design Services — Neil Kersten Public Works Director Kersten explained that Council approved the City I-Iall Program document July 1 �, 2008; and approved the City HalllCity Center Site Planning Contract July 8, 2008. He explained that Bernardo Wills and GGLO developed the City Hall Program document tivliich outlines the function and space requirements for the future city hall; that they have been working on the Cit}� Center Site Master Plan as approved by Council; that Counci! reviewed that draft concept and tonight Barnardo Wi(Is will present the final design for the City Center site. Mr. Kersten also stated that the City has not secured the property for the City Hall Project; and that the contract proposal includes a limit of $50,000 in expenditures for the preliminary worh needed to negotiate dle details of the site purchase and other design work that is not specific to an individual site; and o�ce Council approves the site purchase and the site is under City controt, we �vill contin�ie �vit}i the remainder of the schematic design services for a total cost not to exceed $377,000. After Mr. Barnardo went through his YowerPoint presentatiun, i1 ►ti�us moved by Coimcilme�nber Iaylvr and seconded, to approve the contract to I3ernardo Wills and GGLO for Schematic Design services for City Hall in the amoun! of �377, 000. Mayor Munson moved to amend that motion to authorize the full nmount bu1 limit �50,000 until such time ns the purchase of land is completed. There was no second to the amended motion so the amendment to the motion was not pursued. City Attorney Connelly stated that some triggers would need to be defined to fulfill the request of this contract, such as, would it be contingent upon a bond vote; and we woutd need to define whe� phase 2 would kick in, and whether we would be bound by the option; adding that we don't know what will require the additional sums up to $377,000, and that staff needs to know Council's intent. Councilmember Taylor said he feels that is not necessary as staffwill inform council what the phases will be and what terms would trigger another item. Mayor Munson suggested the full amount would be upon having a complete purchase and sale agreement; �vhile T?eput�f Ma��or Denenn}r said he �vants it defined of ��•hat kind of obli�ation ��e ��fould be entering �'ounci) Regular Meetin�: U;-? Paf,e f, �,f� 1 1 Approvcd by Council� nR.� F tllt0, and that the ��O,OOU could be allocat�d for n��n-site specific acti��ities. itilr. �'onrielly said ihat th� contract is not for materials, but Council would be authorizing the City Manager to enter into a contract. Mr. Kersten pointed out the language on page two that phase one of this work would be limited to a ma�cimum of $50,000 to perform tasks that are specific to the City Center site in support of the City's efforts to purchase the site; or non-site specific tasks thai could be applicable to other sites if the City Center site is not purchased; that the contract would be the standard contract normalty used, with the Scope of «�ork as outlined in his attachment: again emphasizing that this first phase v��ould not e�ceed $50,000. It was then nroved hy Cotmcilmember Taylor tArd secvnded tu ame�rd the mo�io�i lo aulfrorize lhe C'itti� Mcmager to finalize artd execute a contract with Bernardo Witls and GGLO for schematic desigrr services for City Hal! in the amount of $377,000. There was discussio� on completing the contract, what would trigger the move to phase 2, and of timing in general. Mayor Munson said the contract could include «�hen phase 2 would kick in; while Councilmember Taylor suggested leaving the timing and phasing up to staff as staff will not move forward until they are ready. Attorney Connelly said that is built into the Scope of Work and r,an be built intu ihe contract before moving to phase two; otherwise there would be direction without rules. Councilmember Dempsey said she feels we are "buying a pig in a poke" and saici she would not support the motion. Mayor Munson invited public comment; no comments were offered. Councilmember Schimmels said he would not support the total amount but would support the $50,0[►t►: with Councilmember Wilhite me�tioning that according to the Scope, only $50,000 would be spent and then this would come back before Council. It was moved by Depuly Mayor Denenny and seconded, t� � amend the amended motion to state tha< <his authorization is to activate � � f'::: �, ,. �' r - ; r 1 r �- � : � �: : � � � - ; : , . � SSO, 000, n�rd phase 2 will not proceed without co�cil ap� �� <r � i�o1e ai tfie first ame�ided motion to the initial motion u� cn<<l�u�-i 1/IC' Cir}� ,1-I tv ji�tc�li u�l�r e.reciue a contract with Bernardo Wills cmd GGLO for schematic design services for City Ha�l in the arnount of �377,000: In Favor: Mayor Munson, Deputy Mayor Derrenrry, and Cou�icilmembers Taylor, Gothmcmn cmd Wilhite. Opposed.• Co:urcilmembers Schimmels and Dempsey. Mayor Munson invite�l public comment; no comments were offered. Vote on the secorrd amended motion to authorize th�� activation o,J'phase 1 in the amoun! of �50,000; and phase 2 x�ill not proceed without counci! approval. In Favor: Mayor Munson, Deputy Mayor Denenny, and Cour:cilmembers Taylor, Gothnrann and Wilhrte. Opposed.• Councilnrembers Schimmels and Dempsey. [The final approved motion was to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute a contract with Bernardo Wills and GGLO for schematic design services for city hall in the amount of $377,000; to authorize the activation of phase 1 in the amount of $50,000 and phase 2 will not proceed without council approval.] 7. Motion Consideration: FancherBroadway PCC Intersections Bid — Neil KerstenlSteve Worley It was moved by Councilmember Taylur and seconded to mvcrrd the Broadway/Frn�cher PCC Intersection Project to the lowest respo»sible bidder, Cameron-Reilly Inc., for a bid price of $562,450.39. Public Works Director Kersten explained that this project is on the six-year TIP and funded by an 86.5% federal Congestion Management/Air Quality grant up to $702,600; and that the 2009 budget includes funds for the local match portion. Mayor Munson invited public comment; no comments �vere of'fercd. t��t�� 1>>� .Acclmm�tiorr: lir Fm�nr �1�1c7rrinrorrs. Oppo,ced: : �1'o�rc�. Al�.st��ili�»rs: , �rnrrc�. Al��tic,n cnrriec�. 8. Motion Consideration: Bid Award Mission Park — Mike Ston It was moved by Councilmember Wilhite and seconded to crwarc� the Valley A11SS10T! PQ) Inrprov - Phase one Project contract to Skyline Construction in the amount of ,$156,173.1 S. Parks and Recreation Director Stone said eight bids were received at last Friday's bid opening; and that $220,000 is available for the total base bid plus the four addictives of sidewalks, trees, shrub and securiry lights; and said the project is 100% funded through the 2009 Capital Budget; and that the bid amount includes ihose bid Council Regular Meedng: 03-24-20(?9 Page 7 of 1 I Approved by CounciL• DRA FT additives. Mayor Munson invited public comment; no comments �vere offered. Votc� by .�cclumatio,r: In Fcfl�or: Unartimo:e.s. Opposed: No�re. Ahsteirtions: Nc�ne. Mntion eurried PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mayor Munson invited general public comment; no comments ��ere offered. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: 9. Legislative Update from Area Legislators — Mayor Munson Mayor Munson explained that this is an opportunity to have a cluser relationship with our area legislators by having them come to �ur meetings and see �vhat goin� �n, and for them t� tell us what's going on in Washington, D.C. Mr. Mareus Riccelli, Eastern Washington Director for Senator Cantwell, explained that he covers eleven counties, which encompasses most of the 5`� Congressional District; said that he appreciates hearing the deliberative efforts of the Council tonight, and enjoyed the State of the City attended earlier this month; he spoke of how Senator Cantwell's offices work closely to accomplish beneficial goals; and of the opportunity to learn about our issues and assist when able; he spoke of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and of today's challenging times �vith the state's unemployment rate of approximately 9%, which is the highest ever; that the Act may not be the perfect package but Senator Cantwell believes it is needed to ereate jobs, affordable housing, and clean up Hanford quickly, and he mentioned the fundamental supply and demand problcm conceming clean energy; he mentioned Senator Cantwell was recently named chair on the sub-committee on clean energy; and believes we need a smarter electric grid and wants to work to ensure we have smart grid projects, and said there is a potential for 4.2 million ne«- green jobs throughout the natio�. Mr. Riccelli closed by explaining that this is his first time in our Cit}� Hall, and that he looks forward to working with Council. At 8:55 p.m. it K�as nr�ved hy De�uty Mcryor Der�en»y, seco�rded, a�ld tma�rimousll apJ»•oved to exte�ic� the meeting 30 minutes. Ms. Kristina Sabestinas explained that she is the Deputy District Director for Congresswoman Cath}� McMorris Rodgers; that she appreciates hearing about what's going on in Spokane Valley; that Congresswoman McMorris Rodgers is in her ihird term and choose to stay on several of the committees since first elected, the House Armed Services Committee, Education and Labor Committee, and Natural Resources Committee; and serves as Co-Chair of the bipartisan Congressional Women's Caucus; that her priorities are continued economic development of eastern Washington; and continuing affordable anci qualit�� health care; and said her local office is available to constituents; she encourages visits to their website which is re-vamped and includes a facebook page; and said she would welcome participating in council's study sessions whenever they can be of assistance. Mayor Munson again thanked ever��one for coming to speak tonight and for offers of help to get joint agenda issues accomplished. 9a. Snow Removal Winter Road Contract — Neil Kersten (added agenda item) Mayor Munson opened this agenda item by explaining that he �vanted to relate to Council, conversations that he and Mr. Mercier had with the County Commissioners which led up to their meeting Friday; tl�at Mr. Richard called Mayor Munson a few hours before the meeting and outlined the contents of the letter, which is included in this agenda item; which states that the County will not rescind their motion to terminate the contract, but they would be willing and available to provide service if we were unable to accomplish our primary goal of getting snow removal help. Mayor Munson said that he and Mr. Mercier felt there were areas that need clarification before deciding oa a strategy on how to move forward; that he would like clarification on how to define a"good faith effort;" and said we need to address what happens if the City signs with a private contractor who later goes out of business; and said that while z��e understand the County wants us to stop using their resources for snow removal; there is still a need t�� negotiate and understand how� the County would back us up if necessary; and said therc needs to bc Council Regul�r Ivleetin�: 03-?�-�UU9 Ps�,� S uf I 1 Appro��ed hy Council: DRAFT �arallel talks for developing our own program, and to ensure that any glitches have been worked out before we have to think about asking the county for assistance, which Mayor Munson said resulted in �ome push back on that last point; but that he thinks there was an understanding that it expands our horizo�. Mayor Munson stressed that ao decisions were made as the negotiations are beginning, and said we would like to be able to move forward after we've come up with a strategy this eveninb. Public Works Director Kersten said he thinks those are good things to conti�ue to work on; he mentioiied he attended the meeting mentioned in the County's letter, and one of the things that they approved was that the city engineer and staff would assist us in developing any bids or RFPs (request for proposal) a5 we don't have the staff or manpower to do that and they have the experience and all the details and information on the equipment needs. Mr. Kersten continued by explaining that the first issue to consider is using a private contractor and of the pros and cons of doing that; including the tern of the contract, or to have a permanent contract; how to maintairi the equipment and facility; scheduling; materials such as de- icers; plow schedules and routes; performance requirements and other details such as insurence bonding; and stated that it would be his preference to have a private contractor if we can solve some of these issues and get someone who really wants to do tong term contracting, but said he feels until we develop that bid and put it out there, we really won't know for sure who would bid on it. Regarding the RI�P and bid process schedule, Mr. Kersten said he is not aware of any city ��hich has ever done this from scratch, and lie estimated it would take five or six months to develop an RFP, that the responder should have at least thirty days to respond; it would likely take another thirty days to go through the interviews and get to the point where we could recommend someone for the project; which would pusb the start into October or November. Other things to consider, Mr. Kersten explained, is whether they bave that equipment and a facility ready to go, adding that as he explained to the Co�nmissioners, getting this accomplished b�� November is going to be very difficult and unlikel�� no ll�atter ��hich scenari�� e prefer. Mr. Kersten said that other options would include a combination of public,�private; (�ptio�i A is the cit}� buys the land, builds the facility, buy five or six trucks, hire a base level crew of maybe five or six, and then contract for about fifteen people minimum in case we get hit with a harsh winter. Mr. Kersten said the second piece of that would be when you'd hit a heavy snow like we did this year, we'd then have other contracts, probabty more than one like the County did this year for us; we'd hire and set up contracts ahead of time for contractors with road graders. Mr. Kersten said an Option B would be a type of public/private where we would have city crews handle that whole base level operation of the plow/sanders, and just have private contractors with graders do the supplement; the 18 graders we hired this year would be the private piece, everything else �vould be public. Mr. Kersten said he doesn't see a need to have it all city operati�ns. Council/staff discussion included which option would be best, which option could be instigated fastest; the pros and cons of the options and of keeping a private contractor busy year-round; long-term contracts; whether Council wants to remain a contract city and if so, the best mechanisms for that process; cost of buying and maintaining the expensive equipment or the idea of buying a facility and doing a lease-back to a private firm. Mr. Kersten said another option would be using four or five base level staff that would operate equipment, and who could also be operators as well as oversee the crews. Mayor Munson asked Mr. Kersten which option would get us the service by November, and Mr. Kersten replied that he feels the only option that has a chance is the private, assuming they have the equipment available; but added that no matter how we do it, we have to make sure there is a facility, and the only way that's going to happen is if someone has an existing facility; as if we have to buy land and build a facility, thc schedule would be very tight to get that accomplished b}� t��e fa11 c�f 2010. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Denenny, seco�rded cmd llllUlll!)IUll agr�E�c� to exte�td the nreeti�zg another 30 minute.c. Council Regular I�9eetine: 03-2•�-?(�Oy Pa�e 9 of I 1 Approved by Counci I : DRA I� 7' Mr. Kersten said it takes about four months or so once you place tl�e order of the equipment to get it; tl�at when you buy plow sanders they come in pieces, so we would need another contractor to bid to assemble all that and get it up and running; and he estimated it would tal:e sia months from the time the equipment is ordered, until the time they would be ready for use. The idea of buying the County's surplus equipment was mentioned, but Mr. Kersten said if the County was going to surplus equipment, it would likely be equipment in need of repair, so we would need to purchase ten just to mal:e sure we have five that are always operational. Mayor Munson said he believes thai Council's aciion now would be by consensus, to adopt one of the options, and that he would recommend pursuing a private contractor. Mr. Kersten mentioned the idea of doing a two-phased RFP, where staff would issue letters of interest and get a details on their financial ability; that that would e� the overall process time but could prove beneficial in the long term; adding that «�e �vill need to determine how we are going to ensure service; which lias not been thoroughly determined. There was also some discussion on contracting in geographical segments, with Mr. Kersten mentioning that generally only works �vell in smaller communities. Mayor Munson said this topic is scheduled for further discussion April 7; and unless there's opposition, we move forward on the private contractor letting Mr. Kersten develop the variables and give us the progress report April 7. There was no Council opposition. 10. SpraQuelApplewa,y Revitalization Plan — Scott Kuhta Senior Planner Kuhta explained that the purpose of this item tonight is to discuss implementation of the Plan and to consider how or whether to do the plan in phases. Councilmember Taylor suggested going through the process, make any needed changes, and at the end consider phasing; and Mr. Kuhta said phasing in that manner might be confusing as we need to know the regulations and when they would be effective prior to moving into phasing. Mayor Munson said that we need to get the public to agree tl�at the city center idea is good and works, to get the "buy-in," or don't and if no, then see if the remainder of Sprague Avenue development except AutoRow would be successfiil; that he prefers to immediately implement the City Center and AutoRow. Deputy Mayor Denenny suggested first implementing City Center and the Gateway Commercial regulations, then implementing only City Center regulations; and Councilmember Taylor adde-d that if the desire is to see Sprague redeveloped, then the plan should be implemented as soon as possible, with perhaps a few months' time period following adoption to aid in the transition, so no phasing as the sooner we put the regulations in place, the sooner the developme�t starts. Councilmember Dempsey disagreed, and said she feels the philosophy of the whole process is to let people have an opportunity to get into the concept of the city center; the gateway and see that it can work and that positive things that can come from this; and that if we focus on the gateway, that will give citizens the opportunity to see if it will work. Councilmember Gothmann disagreed and questioned ho�� you focus on those wittiout a neighborhood center. Deputy Mayor Denenny said we would implement those because the zoning would take ef�ect, as noted on Mr. Kuhta's Request for Council Action Form #3, which states that "new zaning to become effective after roads have been constructed/re-constructed per the Plan." City Attorney Connelly said the practical problem is, if you implement the regulations on Sprague but not on Appleway, then you've just taken an area and cut it in half and it won't work, and he suggested to either adopt a plan in an area or not, and impose the regulations or don't. Mr. Kuhta said that #3 mentioned above would be occurring on both sides of the streets, then the zoning would be implemented on the whole section. Mr. Connelly said that we can't impose regulations on just streets; that the plan doesn't draw a line along Sprague; it contains an area on Sprague and on Appleway; that it ca� be phased in but it would have to be phased in by segments; as we cannot implement on Sprague and not o�i Appleway without a major re-write of the plan; and said the phasing woutd be in "chunks." Mr. Kuhta said he feels phasing geographically, such as from one major north/south street to the other makes more sense and he suggested adopting the Book I, which is the Comprehensive Plan which lays out the framework; then the City Actions could be adopted as �vell, and then if Council wanted to talk about Council Kegular titeeting: ()3-2�1-2U09 Pagr 10 of 1 I Approvtd by Council: DRA FT phasing in the zoning, to proceed in that manner. Mayor Munson said he doesn't feel good about the problem of acquiring Appleway; ttiat we have been working on this for several years now without an�- progress; and Councilmember Gothmann suggested each councilmember consider these issues, we adjourn now, and come back later for further eomments. Councilmember Schimmels agreed that if we don't have the use of Appleway from University east; someone could come in on the norih side of Appleway on the right-of-way and put in a housing area or apartments, still following through with the plan, and said if we want to tie this to anything, it would have to be tied to the Appleway run, but the rest of it should just be open; it either works or it doesn't. Councilmember Wilhite expressed concern witl� acquiring Appleway from the Commissioners �vithout giving something in return; and said without knowing when Appleway can be further developed, t6at it puts people in a bind with no road; that most o� the people would be interested in re-development and she feels we shoutd work with them; and added w� should move forward with the City Center as the economy picks up, adding there should be morc discussion with the County Commissioners regarding Appleway. Mr. Kuhta reminded everyone of th� upcoming April 28 public hearin��. �+nci s�+c� n��tice� ��il! he �e�it �tit ;�cc�rc�iT��l��. ancl tht ('{�tincil clr<�(; plan will also be available shortl�� INFOkNI_A1 ION 0�1LY: The Splc�sltdurv�r Updute, Se�ver 1'cr►�ehack I'� . . • .: � � ' � . . . Deparfi�ent Reports tiverc for information only and were �rot reported or discuss�� EXECUTIVE SESSIUN: Pendin�Litigation; Land Acauisition It was moved by Mayor Munson, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn tnto Executive Session fc�- vpproYimately thirty minutes to discuss per�ding litigatiorr and lcmd acquisitiorr, and �hat no oction i� anticipated thereafter. Council adjourned into executive session at 10:00 p.m. At 10:15 p.m., May��: Munson declared Council out of executive session. It was then moved by Deputy Mayor Denennti s�conded rnicl:airniinrousll� ngreed to adjorrr». The meetin� adjourned at 10:16 p.m. .�' 1 11:57 : l�ici�,ir�i `,ili>>� �1�z�<�r ��hristine 13ainEirid<�e. �'it� ��I�rl� l�uuncil Re��ular `1ee:iii�: 1►;-�•1-?U(.iy I'as�e 1 1 of� 1 1 Approvc,d by Council: Mrn TUTES STUDY SESSION MEETING SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL Spokane Valley City Hall Spokane Valley, Washington March 31, 2009 6:00 p.m. Attendrr,rcc�: Councilmembers Stat'f' Rich Munson, Mayor Mike Jackson, Deputy City Manager Dick Denenny, Deputy Mayor Cary Driskell, Deputy City Attomey Rose Dempsey, Councilmember Mike Stone, Parks & Recreatiun Dircctur Bill Gothmann, Councilmember Mike Basinger, Senior Planner Gary Schimmels, Councilmember Ken Thompson, Finance Director Steve Taylor, Councilmember Inga Note, Senior Tra�c Enginc<<� Diana �Vilhite, Councilmemher Kathy McClung, Community De�cl��r��c I�ir. Marty Palaniuk, Planning Technician Karen Kendall, Assistant Planner John Whitehead, Human Resources ��l:.r�,��r Carolbelle Branch, Public I��f� � �iii�_�.� Chris Bainbridge Citti• Cler}, Mayor Munson opened the meeting at 6:Oi ►;��: 1 Lew's Do's and Don'ts Trainin�— Le�v L�its'�. `� ash�nt.:t��n � �ti�> l►��uran�c ��utllu��itl ('�\ � I:� � Deputy City Manager Jackson introduced Mr. Lew Lei�h, WCIA Director for the last twenty-eigi�t ytar•. who will present some "Do's and Don'ts" to Council and staff. Mr. Leigh explained that he meets wit}� about thirty Councils a year; that WCIA is solvent, has no sub-prime issues, no buyer's zones. H�� explained the city's risk profile and charis contained i� the packet, and brought Council's attention to tht vignettes also contained in the information. Mr. Leigh gave a brief history of WCIA as the frst municipal risk pool which began in 1981, and was established to protect municipalities from financial loss, an�l stressed that they are not an insurance company. He mentioned in this highly litigious risky culture. Councils and staff must aggressively practice risk management, which includes training at least thre� times a year; two of which are determined by WCIA, with the third the municipality's choice; and said all trainin� sessions are cost-free. He mentioned the roles of council concerning employment of staff anci staff issues; mentioned WCIA's pre-defense review; said if Cou�cil is going to hear land use appeals thc;�� Council's quasi judicial skills need to be superior; mentioned the appearance of fairness doctrine; that Council could waive its attorney/client immunity privilege but individuat councilmembers cannot as ther� are no individual immunity powers; briefly mentioned the problems associated with keeping �+ moratorium for an extended time (months not years); of the need to treat all h��inc��e� e��t;,ll�, .��n�-+ t�f ��.. Iflli��("<it9l�C �'� �l11i�`�\;?1!' ill�'il!�1�'1'C (�{�1�?:' ��llt��j,� t�� "'�: lf' <� J1lIf��':L fl �', �l�ll:illl:lll��Il �Il�:i . �� ,�� Via her PowerPoint pre��n<<�ti�� l�iill� I�I1k111Cc'1 ��IC ��l�C �i �)�l�l� U�'�l'� 1c1� �'�i 1C�ii11� :,l`�i��i� coordination, including paits of the cabinet, detection loops and cameras, with mention that motorcycl��s and non-metallic bicycles are not able to trigger the loops; acld mentioned the cycle lengths and pattern�. 3. Interlocal Agreement Havana Bridge Project — Carv Driskell Deputy City Attorney Driskell explained that Spokane Attorneys James Richman and John Mercer will provide an explanation for Council on this issue as the City of Spokane proceeds with their Havana Str�et Bridge prc�jc�.:t. � `,�11�:�1 ��..�f'i.jCt�: i�l1l' �II'� 11f1111�: t��;il i�l� ;;(��,';1 �; i�:� ��('�.�)�� !� ��1''tl,l��t i��,`►1�';_� f�� cti�:ill:' Counci! Nleeting h�1rj,�rrr�s. �.�-?1-r�� 1'�� i�,,; .: Approved by Council: County and partially by Spokane City; and that part of Spol:ane City's project will reyuire some land �vilhin Spokane Valley's boundaries; and through a proposed interlocal agreement, they have requested permission to act on our behalf. Mr. Mercer explained that this project has bad a long life as it began in 2002; they signed a contract with Washington State Department of Transportation, and under th�t agreement the DOT is responsible for all design work, right-of-way acquisition, advertising, bidding and construction management, as well as it is their responsibility to pay for these services. Mr. Mercer said the project to build the bridge includes lowering some of the railroad tracks at Havana Street from Broadway to Mission, that this project will greatly improve transportation as this area is an important commercial and freight area; he said that street is blocked by trains about seventeen hours a day, adding that this project is the first bridging of the valley project; and that while the DOT handles the right-of- way, they don't do condemnation if any properties require that, which is where the project is now; he said that phase one starts abc�ut Juty «�ith the relocation of some utility lines, and it should be finished by October ?0 ] 1. Attorney Riehman said that t}ie interlocal agreement is necessary� as a portion of the property is located within Spoka�e Valley city limits; that cities have authority to acquire propecty or streets only within their boundaries, and said they need to partner with Spokane Valley in the condemnation action, and that the interlocal borrows our authority to exercise that condemnation authority and he described how that will occur at no expense to Spokane Valley. Mr. Richman noted that the interlocal has an ordinance attached to it which includes a finding of public use and necessity, and lays out the fact that the owner has been noticed by certified mail and by newspaper publication; and he said that they have been in intermittent negotiations with the property o�vner over a period of approximately two years, with the more productive negotiations taken place recently; and said they need to file a condemnation action to keep the project on schedule, which puts the property owner in a beneficial position regarding property price; and said that the need to begin a lawsuit doesn't mean negotiations cease, and if anything would increase and therefore reach resolution. Mr. Richman said buying property by this method is not cheap and the property owner will come out all right. Mr. Richman said the ordinance also designates tlieir office as special council to Spokane Valley to represent them in acquiring the property; and said the interlocal agreement obligates Spokane City to pay all costs and grants them eaclusive decision-making authority regarding the property; and if there is a lawsuit, they will work with our City Attorney's office. Deputy Mayor Denenny asked once the property is acquired, who will own the properiy; and Mr. Richman said it wou(d be part of the street, and they �vould ask us after this is done, to dedicate it for public right-of-way purposes; so title would still be held by Spokane Yalley, but they'd like to be able to improve and maintain it; and in respo�se to further question, said this action will not alter the city's corporate boundary; but Spokane City is in renewed discussion �vith Spol:ane County so the two entities' corporate boundaries will co-exist; and also mentioned they are exploring the potential acquisition of more than what is actually needed for tl�e project, and in that case, the boundary would become the right edge of the right-of-way. Mayor Munson called for a recess at 7:25 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 7:33 p.m. 4._Comprehensive Plan AmendmentslOuarterly Update — Mike Basin�er Senior Planner Basinger explained that this year's planning team includes Planninb Technician I�1art}� Palaniuk and Assistant Planner Karen Kendall. Mr. Basinger mentioned that the Planning Commission findings are not included in tonight's packet, but wil) be distributed to Council prior to the first reading. The PowerPoint presentation mentioned that the Comp Plan lays out a vision for the future of Spokane Valley during a twenty-year period and responds to the requirements of the Growth Management Act (GMA); he explained the site-specific map amendments, one which is privately initiated and three which are city-initiated, and showed maps of the areas in question; followed by review of the city-initiated text amendments to Chapter 2 Land Use, which included the re-designation of the public/quasi-public property, and proposed amendments to Chapter 3 Transportation, Chapter 4 Capital Facilities and Public Services, and Chapter 8 Natural Environment. Mr. Basinger said that after Council has had an opportunity Council A�leeling 1�li�iutes: 03-3l-D9 f age 2 of -� Approved by Council: to review everything, he encouraged Council to bring any addilional questions to the tirst reading, and said it is not his intent to individually go through all 160 parcels during that ordinance reading. Deput� City Manager Jackson added that this report also covers the quarterly update, and said if Cc�uncil has itcros for the ne�t round of ai�lt 'IIC�iTIc'T1tS , to also please make thosc su;,�estions tc� 5taf�f. ' � � remo��d from the agenda to be brought back (��ter. 6. Advance Agenda — Mayor Munsor� Mayor Munson mentioned that the airport ordinance is now sclledul�d for April 1�. Tl�erc �vere n� �thcr suggested changes to the advance agenda. 7. Council External Committee Reports — Councilmembers Councilmember Wilhite mentioned the tent meetings regarding transportation issues and visioning for transportation, including the idea of a transportation benefit district, and said the Spokane Regional Transportation Council is working to develop modeling and planning with iraf�ic across the Idaho border as they are determined to have a beneficial closer working relationship with Kootenai Countti�. Councilmember Gothmann mentioned discussion in the legislature about the local option for health funding and said they will watch that item for updates. Deputy Mayor Denenny mentioned the hiring of Dr. Joel McCullough from Portland, as the District's new Health Officer. Other items included Deput}� Mayor Denenny's mention of the solid waste system discussion of the future organization of the governance structure of that system, and said as the bonds are paid off, there will be an ability to further discuss interlocals and that he would like something that gives proportioaal representation much like the STA and Health District; and he read some of the highlights of the February 25, 2009 Solid Waste Systen� Memorandum and said he seeks Council's input. Discussion on this topic inc(uded concern about accountability, that we pay a higher rate for solid �vaste services and Council needs to be ready when th�� options come up to look at other services; that the bonds are scheduled to be paid off during the last monih of 2010; and of the mention of two different committees doinQ almost the same thing yet reportin�� to two different entities, which is confusir�;.�. Mayor Munson mentioned the TNIDL (total ma�imu►n daily load) alid the ��aste��aler plant a�icl dire;c:tc� Council's attention to the e-maii discussions and questions generated from a March 25 meeting oi� stakeholders. Mayor Munson said he and Councilmember Wilhite attended the GMA {growtlf Management Act) Advisory Committee meeting and said the County came up with another formula fc�� population allocation, which he'll ask Mr. McGormick to discuss in more detail later; that the G�i Executive Team met a few weeks ago where he was tasked to come up with something to publish to thc stakeholders, and he completed that and distributed it to committee rnembers and suggested revision�. Other items mentioned included the fasi pace of the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistancc Grant Program, other grants available such as the one for pre-trial service test programs: �n�l 1�r. Jackson s�id the JAG grant �vill be discussed in further detail in upcoming meetings. 8. Council Check-in — Mayor Munson: Councilmember Gothmann said that Council took a positio❑ or made recommendations prior to when he and Councilmember Dempsey came to council, regarding programs conducted by our Parks ancl Recreation Department; and whether ihey could or could not be held within the Edgeclift Neighborhooci C�nter; and said he understands Council's position was that they should not be held there; but added that the faciliry has a gym available and there could be other things he is not aware of regarding the faciliri� and our programs, and he would lil:e further discussion of that previous council ratio�ale. Deputy Cih� Manager Jackson said that there was formerly poticy discussion on full cost recovery of recreatior� programs except the summer playground; and said staff can re-visit the issue of use of Pratt Elementar�� facilit��. and �aicl �taff ��ill �lian themselves �vith C�uncil's �oals of makin� sust�inahle recreati�n C:uu�,�rl hf��rrng Ai:�rut��s. �I_3- ? 1-U� 1'�1�� .� �� -� Approved by Council: programs so the programs would recover its expense. Councilmember Gothmann said he �vould like this topic added to a future agenda, including the idea of businesses sponsoring some programs. Due to the prolonged winter weather, it was moved by Councilmeniber Dempsey, seconded and unanimously agreed th�rt �ve �o into sprirrg, have a gentle spri�lQ i»>c� J�u��c� thc� sea.snn.�� cr.c ��tE�t• ar�� supposed to be. 9 Citv Mana�er Comments — Mike Jackson Deputy City Manager Jackson mentioned that some grant ��pportunities are cc�min� u� fast, and he wilf bring an update next �veck. �I�here being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 8:�5 p.m. ATTEST: Richard Munson, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, Cit}� Glerk Counci! Mee�ing Nli�rutes: 03-31-09 PuK�' a �f a Ap�roti�ed bv Corr�icil: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meet�ng Date: April 14, 2009 City Manager Sign•off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business �new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading of Ordinance 09-005 amending the density limitations in Zone 6 of the Airport Hazard Overlay Zone located in Table 19-110-1, Section 19.110.030 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70., 14 CFR 77 and SVMC 19.110.030 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: Staff was directed by the City Council to review the density limitations of Zone 6 within the Airport Hazard Overlay and propose alternatives. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 23, 2008 and continued the public hearing on December 11, 2008 and forwarded no recommendation. The City Council was presented the Planning Commissions motion on January 20, 2009 and decided to move forward with review of the proposed amendment without a recommendation. Staff presented five (5) options to the City Council regarding the proposed amendment to Zone 6 density limitations in the Airport Hazard Overiay. On March 24, 2009 the City Council was presented Ordinance 09-005 with the option to allow underlying density in Zone 6 as long as the parcel(s) met one of three criteria. Carter Timmerman from Washington State Department of Transportation (WSD�T) Aviation Division testified with concems regarding proposed amendment and offered two (2) proposed solutions to the City Council on March 24, 2009. See written testimony in exhibit A. Additionally, Council Member Gothman requested the City Attorney to respond to questions raised regarding RCW-36.70.547, see exhibit B and C. ANALYSIS: Below, staff has provided analysis for the proposed option in Ordinance 09-005 (aka: Option 4) and the two (2) options proposed by WSDOT-Aviation Division. Staff received further analysis from WSDOT-Aviation Division pursuant to the solutions presented on March 24 2009 (exhibit E). Spokane Valley Municipal Code Section 17.80.150(6) provides approval criteria that the proposed amendment of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code must meet. The criteria and staffs analysis are below for each proposed option: A. Option 1- City's proposed opt�on (Ordinance 09-005): (aka: Option 4) amends Zone 6 of the Airport Hazard Overlay Section 19.110.030, Table 19-110-1 as follows; 1. Allow density of underiying zoning within Zone 6, however developmenf musf comply with a minimum of one (1) of the following exceptions; : t l 1 1 \�l��l:�it Sl)i L��i:!(�1� :��ti��i � �. I��: �I:�` l�t � )tl�. fl��-�1(�l � (�.1��. ! l� � a. The site had water or sewer stubs installed for future development prior fo the adopfion of fhe Cify of Spokane Valley initial airport hazard overlay regulations on 2-28-06 by Ordinance 06-002; or b. Consisfent with adjacent (nof across public rights of way) property sizes for proposed development; or c. More than one r�sidence is locafed on a property, excluding any residence used at one time for a dependenf relative, may develop property consisfent wifh underlining zone fo make conforming. ln addition, language shall be placed upon the face of the �nal plat to serve as notification of possible incr�ease in noise. 2. All final shorf subdivisions and final subdivisions located within Zone 6 of the Airport Hazard Overlay shall contain the following dedication language on fhe face of fhe plat "These lots are locafed in an Airport Hazard Overfay fhat may be subject to increased noise levels. " 1. Criteria: The proposed amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. Staff Comment: Policy TP-13.2 within the Comprehensive Plan states "discourage...density adjacenf fo the airport" within the airport hazard overlay. Staff recognizes GMA dir�cts jurisdictions fo plan for incompatibility of uses around airports. Section 36.70.547 states "...shall...discourage the siting of incompatible uses adjacent fo such general aviation airport': The language provides guidance by using "...discourage..." instead of providing directive "shall deny': Additionally, compliance with GMA is not defined by adherence fo one specific goal. The proposed option of allowing development with exceptions would provide fhose pr�perties that have had the infent of further land division to proceed. This option conflicfs by allowing density within an area that is recommended to be protected from encroachments that may create safety hazards and exposure to noise, however staff concludes this option is consisfent with the State's Growth Management Act (GMA) goals and policies as well as the City's adopfed Comprehensive P/an. The majority of pofential new /ots ar� located more than 3,000 feet fr�m the runway. The installation of water and sewer stubs is consisfent with Goa! CFP-9. The data collecfed fr�m rhe Spokane County Division of Ufilities shows approximafely 224 lots wifhin Zone 6 have been stubbed for sewer. Ther� are 79 lofs that r�sceived fwo or more sewer stubs. Orcharn► Avenue Irrigation District dafa shows approximately 35 lots received extra wafer stubs within Zone 6. There are a fotal of 12 /ots that received water and sewer stubs within Zone 6. 2. Criteria: The proposed amendment(s) bear a substantial relation to the public health, safety, welfare and protection of the environment. Staff Comment: The density increase would allow for addifional growth and provide mor+s opfions for locations of housing within the City of Spokane Valley. It has not been determined if capacity exists to provide services to additional residences however fhis concem is not significantly detrimental to fhe public healfh, safety, welfare and environmenta! profection. Request for Council Action (2 Rcading of Ord. 09-005) Page 2 of S B. Option 2- WSDOT: Allow density in the underlying zoning designation if one of the criteria is met (aka: Option 4) for area south of Utah Avenue and E. Rutter Avenue within Zone 6. and the area north of Utah and E. Rutter Avenue the density restriction in Zone 6 would remain; 1. Criteria: The proposed amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. Staff Comment: Policy TP-13.2 wifhin the Comprehensive Plan states "discourage...density adjacent fo the airporf" within the airport hazarr.� overlay. The proposed option of allowing developmenf with exceptions would provide those properfies thaf have had the intenf of further land division to proceed. This option conflicts by allowing density within an anea thaf is r�commended to be protected from encroachmenfs that may create safety hazarrls and exposur�e to noise, however staff concludes this option is consistent with the Stafe's Growth Management Act (GMA) goa/s and policies as wel! as the Cify's adopted Comprehensive Plan. This solution presenfed by WSDOT-Aviation Division provides a compromise to the neighborhood by allowing development pursuant to option 1 above south of Utah Avenue and E. Rutfer Avenue, but protecting the area to the north as it is in c/ose pr�ximity to the flighf pattems of aircraft. 1've split zone 6 info two (2) sections. Zone 6a r�epresents all par�ce/s locafed north of Utah and E. Rutter Avenue and Zone 6b r�pr�senfs all parcels south of Utah and E. Rutter Avenue locafed within the Airporf Hazarrl Overlay Zone 6 designafion. The table below indicates the number of parce/s in each area thaf have the potentia! of being further divided wifh fhe underlying zoniny designation. # OF PARCELS W1TH THE POTENTIAL TO BE FURTHER DIVIDED Underl in Zonin Zone 6a Zone 6b R-2 39 arcels 112 arcels R-4 3 arcels 72 arcels Total 42 arcels 184 arcels The ana/ysis was done only to eva/uate /of size for fur�her development only. There may be other factors that limif development of a property even fhough fhA lof size is large enough. 2. Criteria: The propose� amendmeni(s) bear a substantial rel�tion to the public health, safety, welfare and protection of the environment. Staff Comment: The density increase wou/d allow fo� addrtional gro�vtf� ancl provide mor� options for Iocations of housing within the City of Spokane Valley. It has not been determined if capacity exists fo provide services fo additional riesidences however this concem is not significantly c,+etrimPnt�l to the puhlic healfh. safety, lveffare and environmental pro�ection. :�._ ._. ;�i�r �_ ,...... . _.. ..� � t .... .�� .... �.'� . .!� � . ; �:. ; C. Option 3- WSDOT: Amend the City's development regulations to allow mixed use development north of Utah and E. Rutter Avenue and allow density in the underlying zoning designation if one of the criteria is met (aka: Option 4) for area south of Utah Avenue and E. Rutter Avenue within Zone 6. 1. Criteria: The proposed amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. Staff Comment: The proposed option to have mixed use development north of Utah and E. RutterAvenue is in conformance with Goal TG-13 and policy and TP-13.2 of the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan however not with Goals LUG-1 and NG-2 stating "Preserve and protect fhe character of Spokane Valley's r�esidential neighborhoods. " Additionally, the Growfh Managemenf Act (GMA) `housing" goa! stafes uEncourage fhe availability of affordable housing fo alI economic segments of the population of this sfate, promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage preservation of exisfing housing stock. " The cument r�esidential neighborhood is established and prr�vides a variety of housing types for all demographics. A mixed use zoning would allow for o�ce, retail and/or lodging along with higher densif}r r�esidenfia! that can be developed vertically or horizontally among established sing/e-family residents. This proposed option would change the current density limitations within Zone 6 south of Utah and E. Rutter Avenue. The area south of Utah and E. Rutter has 184 lofs with the potential of being further divided with the underiying zoning designation. A comprehensive p/an amendment is required fo change the land use designation of all parcels norfh of Ufah and E. RutterAvenue to mixed use. 2. Criteria: The proposed amendment(s) bear a substantial relation to the public health, safety, welfare and protection of the environment. Staff Comment: The change in land use may cneate some impact to surrounding residences, but fhe density increase would a!!ow for additional growth and provide more options for locations of housing within the City of Spokane Valley. It has not been determined if capaci�jr exists to prr�vide services to additional residences however this concem is not signi�icantly detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare and environmental profection. This question of mixed use development north of Utah and E. Ru�ter Avenue will be further explored during a comprehensive plan amendment review. OPTIONS: Proceed as proposed, or as modified; or direct staff further. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: 1. City Council to approve ordinance 09-005 to include Option 1; or 2. City Council to approve ordinance 09-005 to include Option 2; or 3. City Council to approve ordinance 09-005 to include Option 3. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None. STAFF CONTACT: Karen Kendall, Assistant Planner Request for Council Action (2 Reading of Ord. 09-005) Pagc 4 of 5 ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Ordinance 09-005 Exhibit B: Memo from Mike Conneliy regarding RCW 36.70.547 Exhibit C: Staff s �esponse to RCW 36.70.547 with exhibits Exhibit D: Written testimony from Carter Timmerman, WSDOT-Aviation at 3-24- 09 City Council meeting Exhibit E: Analysis of proposed solutions from WSDOT-Aviation dated 4-6-09 Exhibit F: Written comments from Neal Sealock, Director of SIA dated 4-3-09 Rcqucst for Council Action (2"� Reading of Ord. 09-OQS) Page S of S n,�. /'�. ^��'" "�� Department of Community Development Spokane - ��aile�� Planning Divisio� rt- �.r : � nd ' ' ea ln � r lnance - � April 14, 2009 �.�� ^4�/ _��r ►.� 1. 1 ' .. . " 1 j �/. . . �. . ..1� r�.�- .- �:Arf _` - . , - - ' � � � � * " 1 �� . .. . - .- J\�i 1 � i 1 " . _. � � . ` .. ' ' • 7 � ` `r _�.� I �-� ` r `' # . . ',1 `..` �r . + r � j �� 1• 1 � is i' � . . . ' � ' ' . .� . • � � � �, � j �- � �' ' � .. �: �` L _. r. �F" y� "� -4 , 1� • -�' . t .�_= �, . ' � I .� � ..♦ � y ai �� i� , ��r '��► ,,�v,�+� . . . �-.N: .. : . � � ,•_;,, ., y• + ��'�' . '� .. _ . Y .. ,. � �} a . ;'�,� _, �,,� S*.� •'� t�.• � i � � } � �— � --� r , �,'' — , < < " �, � =y.•.'. x '� �, ' 7 �• ;J � s� �j � t ' ' � � , f . . , , � �� ', +I „"� �- �...r �a� �!h-C t�_- ' - - , �� j-�1,.� � - � '_ �!� � ,�✓' *. .,�"? •. , �• -, . Y '� ;•. .�� - � r 'i � ..�� I ~ Y 1 � Y � . �� r ' ' , , i , ��-'� �►t �� r 1 '�: i r � ,' . . . `�,; , ,_ . , � _ � . . . � � � .,. -=•1'cf `1 � a--�'s � '�-• -ti /p � i... � � � ' �. , ti ,:. ��. � � � , r - . . . � , • y , �. . . . . �: ' - • . J1 �"' _ . _ . . ' , y �� ..._ Y��•'•... - � � t �' � `' � * v� � -. / �r 'r ; � r. ! � ' �` �. "' . �a� k . - • �� . . r . • CTA-04-08 Amendment to the S�i�MC Sectlon 19.110.030 � Ai ort Hazard Overla � Y n �:.�� .. :�" Depar�ment of Community Developmen� S`pokanc - .- _,.-, �•s�alley ��lanning Div�sion ro ose men m�n 19.110.030 Airpo�•t Haza.rd Overlav � tion 1: Allow densi of underl ir� zone if criteria � tY y g met. • io n 2: Allow dens i o f underl in zone i f criteri a ot p Y g met south of Utah and E. Rutter Avenue and densi restrictions would �ema�� fo� area north. � tion 3 e Allow densi of underl in zone if criteria � tY Y g l�net south of Utah and E . Rutter Avenue. Pro ose CP p amendment to m�x�d use north of Utah and E Rutter Avenue. . . . , _ _ - -- - j �.• ,r � ' 1 ' I ! 1 I �� ' � � � _ . 1 1 �« . ; .�. � �. � � � � ' � . ! • �� 1 1 • , , . . , .. ,� �•_ .. - - - - . y�: ----� �� . �, -� - � ■n� ■ , +`��'i= � � �.. �� : � � �� 1 � � � � � �.� . • . � • • :' e�� r. , Ir — � 1= ■• ■� .1_ 1 ■ �D •�r .� � � _ _ �� • r��■ ■r'��1 � . . �e -� o� ��• -�',�'1r , . �� 1 � , 1� _o- . ••� �4A11 � � � :_ �. r— o- -- :J: � .. r �� rN1��1��r�■ � � _�__�_ ' �. ►�.. o_ __ ■■ • �= �: G�d 1111 oi� iti i��i� � +� ��a�� !� ■ �iiir rr��r C� ��111� ---•-- �_ =::� ��: ►,�:1��=:. �'`= :rw�.■. ■■� .■ ��■_ :_s � �� —�� ■, �.� �. r��.��.rrrls7■ ■��■S �.. � r �■■f� ��I�� d °�'ii � �'s' a� � ■.�� ■�1 : 1�� fl��" �1�/n� C� /111ri� �� 0�1 ��r 0� Q� ■�/■�■■ ■�!■� ■ �.. .. ,_ �, r ! t�Nr�■ ■�r�■ ■■ s■.1��■■ � n� �n� �� o� ..�! �!� 11� �1� �1; 111� 11!� 1�� : �� t� � ■ �+�� ■� �.. ��, �� --.. a,.-• r...�� ...� �S�/� �i �i� �"' i�_ �� •�■I � 0� �n�i f� �� ■i� �� 0 � ��'r 5��■ � � ■� � � �� ".� � - � �� "� �� '�� a�t� � r ■ /��■ ! i� � � � � _. ■0 �� 111 0� �� L� �A i�'� ■�� 11�'��A �„ � �� .ifi� �,�� f� �■ � � � l�� = 1 �� 1 ��1111111N�1.. w � �+• ■ p� ��i� �� rr-�■ �r ■ .. . . � � � 0� .. ..� �E. �.s _�i •� s t+� 1�■��■ �� LII =� .1/1 LI1. .. .�� / � �r �— =��o — � �+ �� ii 1� �� - �t� ��/ ► �'� w � � �// �0 �r �� r� ■� �� 1�� ,C �� r �� ■ . ■a ■�o _�� ■�•�■�• .�� _�■■■C -- - ■ _ , . q ��,.:�� :�.� r. ;�---.. -:� � _.. �.. •• . � 1�1� . � � ,. 1 _.l�� I��1�1 ... ��. �� .. �i: ��''� � r t :C�IQ�Q 0��11� Cr ��■ � �C S�' : � r� ' � / � _ -- - �rr1�! • � +� �� i �� % � i.1 � ��I�I��r �1�1�.. �� .. � �.. � + r• � � -, - /d��C�iir�i 0 I� ��lI1�7 �fa�■ 1�� .. - �— - ,,,� .� .i � �� C ri�u U� �!� 11�11^� ��I��IIC � �' �� S �� .�,�I�� 0�0��■ ■■�� .. ��11 ■�� 'r' C� s� ��'�w : ' : • � —� �� _ � ��1��1� �� r� � � ��u191� a �`1�1�� ■�� C � `~""� ; " - �1 �i: : t��i'.�. �i i�■c� d�1��" ��I�� _ � 111� . , - ,- . _ �■ � : �,� � �� ;.: � —..�� -■■ �. = �� . �� r��r ��r� � �' ■ � _ _ ' ■ .�� a1��1� �0"��IIO�� t �ca �r.,.. �1�� - _ s'r � E� ' � n �r �� " ��" � � +,�� a�..�� ••- -,�� u.., � a � , � ' ��0 A ..� � � ��1111��■� �� .�--,.� Di�� 1 �� . � � 11 ' �'�i .■ � , �A ■� �;�a� �f��■ 11� � � = _ : . ��. �- _ �; . � — IA�� _ - - �1 ��.�� . . : , � . ;.. �� ._ ... -• �.� �' � -_ d�'. t�� _ , �■ � C �.� ..� �. . a _,� Ir■ � . � � .�. . �� _ �.. � �� It� ��Nr11��1� =�11... r��.,�. �� : • = - _ . = C � . �° �� ■ r /� .� r 1111 �� - _ � � r � �r �o �� p �� t 11� - - . - � . . - �� t� r� � r � ��1� �� +��■ i �� _ � � � i � • � �■�' �� r �M � ■ � �� nE:s �r _ i � � �n�� r� �r ii � �� ■■ _ � � f �i� � +j �� "� � 1� /��i� .� .11l� �C �� +� �� r■ ■ � .- �r ■ ��■��I� � ■■ /�1�� : �a rra �� = .�� rM�� - : ,_ . : p/ ■/I�/t � � : � '1� �� : �:� �/ ��/�■ ■�� /�� 1 �� _ � ��lr ��e:�"K`a'��1111'�I/111�� ■��1��11 1��11� � � /�II��, � � ■��L.1��'� � . . � . . . � �■��r�.� �n �� ■�� a��l��_ % � „,�. � -,.:�,� .,....` Department of Community D�,��o�m�� Spokane ;= r ; ��Valley Planning DivYSion . 2 6 � : � r� r � _ uiui�r' -� �r' . � , _ � .��f r.f) . . . , � • f . . . �-:'r..��-i � � . r �'1 � • j . � .. , � . - � � __��_—_ _ _ .— __' � 1 ..�.�.. ��._ Zone 6a= : � � �: 0 parceis � a Y l — —� � --�.»"I.: : p ; �1 � =,�,.. ..� - ��r:3� = ;�: � � + ,�-1 t , �;'� ,-1.�.�i . �i t '� �. 4 �.. v � ,� �, �� , T .. _ _ �,,,,�, � �- - ,.1 , - : �' � s 'S'G n � � •— � � `” r . �./ :� . � . � . � � pver � C!L � ` ��i� �/ I•_'_ .-. �•r r+? . .. •�� -�� j' � _ _.__ �� ' `i ` _ ' p ; i � & : �� . O f MvY� .: �- .�� ; , ,�: l) h I • f , r ,, �; � _ . _ .� � ; - � � .�� '� 'r �r � r� : � � � ; � ..i ; {� � _ �l ,��f� I � � � � _ � : � . �_ �� J �II� .� � _ —+ -- - . �� Zone 6b= ?_ . , � .�._ _ __ _ -- _ �: � _ .�-- :i..� � _ - ,�, � � _... , 184 pa rce I s ,;�a - �.-�-�, ��.� � - �, � �S'� / n � _ - y ' f '_ � ' ' � n - : . . ' . i`�� ' ! � / � �+� _ ^ . _ �- i � /� CLL�irr � � _ � ,:. NA�1YN ... _. . . � . u�..td. � . � � r } !� C + ! ' _ • 1_I 7 r � ` � .. (/ � - � .� a.� /S ' -, ' i fG . �� T �u`l sS - •� � a �i'. ` . . . d' _ �- �.. � . �d' � II►rw � tsw�r � � `� e' . -'-' s � : _ � .: . - `��- � � � � � ; � wa...� 3 , �` '�;i�. - - - ; ` =ti ( • - - ' � �� , �rn.• � ^ t, � . . � . � -- IIAlw�- � � - . /r ` . � � . " �r a o � � ,. ��r ;.� � 'a �- - � �. . _ 'q'' - r-r w • ,. .- " � u , r:n. �,,,, _ �'�`��-�.J'r�� ' ` ;4�','�.�' i � - - : c <. _ . � ., r T _ . � �0 . { �,, �' � � -^ 4 . _ �. � . 1�' _ f' .t:� � , , . . - . ' �� _. . r � � t ! y!� ':� � � i. �/ - f . ., � ' ' • . . ' . . - ' � - )/�� '° +`''`6cA' I� �i"ir�.j�C�i ■ �P75 ��r�� i��rr�� i�� r�l��.� � ��'"�a�� ...� �`��a� ��. _, 0 � � �+ � f ,'�3 � �{ f � �,�- r � # .�i� r i� _� � � Jf � � �'� , ,° .- ,- ��.� � � � �'�'' �t��e �� - •,..; �"I��ce�l �1�� r.. f: f• +� � I��'' . o �� 4 � ti ,� '"�v ,^ r a ,�'" 6�� '`'_`1, � � f�°,,.,, ��7 V,: �,,� � .Y� T�, r `� � � { �� i. :�'�, �� .�� i 5 � � / �. I ... .. i9w�r �. ` � �� =� � � ' r ' '�`:! r"- � • � i� • J r� (� p � p ...Jal '`� � �� . � � �� , �� '' �"" �� i �' �� i �� -- � � �� ` � �' �� I �, � � � — �� - �.:�'� �� f�1 � y �� - �� f "� '� � � � �� ; � r� � � , 'r'`�. � � �t� f K ,� � �:�r � �'' � �� }'s � ± � � � _ �r��3�7�._ . � _ `� ,.e. A � ,,,�„+�„N � as s. -. �.ga�� - _ � � . � t � � { , �� . � �_ _ ��..�.�a f . 't _ . . 4 ' ` I /� . M � � � � . .�.- 1 Y f eF�I ^ ' � d � � v � � $ ►taig � � � � � . - -. . . Y.rY.a�1Ga� � � ti� . . � - . .. ` . . . . _ . . . � +� —__ . . -;� i. ' *�� Stii`*!i� . � ' • �r . . . . ' - � 7 ' ;� 1� �F T�� _ } �wl� � ,� � � t. k� i"yt ' . . � i . .l��" .. . . ��" � . . � . +� _: - � . - � . , 1t1�!",+s in .. �,r x •`t �ddWf r" - k � • � - _- - � ,- - - d N+if�f'� � R� �, a �� J �' � _ . - ' . ' � - . �. . . - � � �. 1�.� 1' � ' _ . _ ' . ' _" "_ _ __. _ - �� Ibs _� � _ � . �. . . --{ - A gi • } # ? 1..1� ^?�"i' .'�F ��{ ��.lj.�t1�.,,� �4 �f _ _ •• . • . > 1� - � r-�+f� . _ . . � � � e - � . - _. _- , � . . . - . . _ , � L � � p � Ii .� _ _ l.fJl�.� ,. _ _ . �[' � .. -- R+rr _ �� _ ^ . �aaa� �, i W.�.� = � � � � � + �. �wTr� � T �*f � M� tiy1�.�� * +� # tl R r� „1 � + � �� nrr,,�g ..y 5 r t4 �. 3 h �e` g f '�"t r . ,;• � �, f � >"�.� �.d� . . o .. ` . t �w..�� a_'..1�. � �� '��'�� Departme�t of Community I)evelopment S`pokanc � ,S 1 � •. ��alley Planning Di�isio� � ��`�� 0 � CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE N0. 09-005 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON AMENDING ORDINANCE 07-015 SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 19.110.030, TABLE 19•110-1 CHANGING THE DENSITY LIMITATIONS IN ZONE 6 OF THE AIRPORT HAZARD OVERLAY ZONE WITH CRITERIA AND ADDING DEDICATION LANGUAGE FOR SHORT SUBDIVISONS AND SUBDIVISIONS: WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley adopted the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) pursuant to Ordinance 07-015, on the 24th day of September, 2007; and WHEREAS, the SVMC became effective on 28th day of October, 20�7; and WHEREAS, the amendment is consistent with the ga�ls �nd policies of the Ci'y's Com;�rehensive Pl2n� an�:; WHEREAS `tflc Cliy �f�OVtUZG' a CO�j/ Oi t��c p� dn�G, lUillcflt LO COi�I�f i i�.J(l�� Tradc drei Economic Development (CTED) initiating a 60 day comment period pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106; anc, WHEREAS, the City has had "formal consultation" with "airport owners an��i �~��,:"��r�-, private airports operators, general aviation pilots, ... and tn;. a�ui��;ior, Cl!'Ji�lUfl o` tnE depa�tment of transportation" pursuant to RCW 36.70.547; an;=i WHEREAS, the amended ordinance as set forth bears a substar�tiai rela-ion to �� public health, safety and U�elfare and protection of the environment; and WHEREAS, the Commission received evidence, information, pubiic testimony and a staff report and recommendation at a public hearing on October 23, 2008; and WHEREAS, the Commission deliberated on December 11, 2008; the Commission provided no recommendation; and WHEREAS, on January 3, 2009, Council reviewed the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, on I�Jlarch 3. 2009, Ca«ncil reviewed the praposed amendments; and WHEREAS, on March 24, 200�, Gouncil considered a first ordinance re� ciing to aJopt the proposed amendment; and WHEREAS, on April 14, 2009, Council considered a seconci ordinance reading at �vhicn time Council approved of the proposed amendmen'. Ordinance 49-00� I�iodification to Zone 6 in Airport Hazard Overlay (Section ly.I 1C1.030) Page l of � NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL SPECIFICALLY ORDAINS AS SET FORTH BELOW: Section One: SVMC Chapter 19 shall be amended as follows: 19.110.030 AIRPORT HAZARD OVERLAY Table 19-110-1 Airport Land Use Cornpatibility Prohibited Uses: U - tion �1: Table 19-110-1 Ai ort Land Use Com atibili � Prohibited Uses Prohibited Uses � ort Land Use Com atibili Zones 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sin le-famil Residential • • �i; � • � 1 du/ 5 1 du/ 2.5 � a••r �,� n�ro Maximum Densi ** n/a n1a acres acre n/a Linderl��inU zune � �`' Manufactured Housing Parks • • • • • • Multi-farnily Residential • • • • • • Schools • • • • • • Parks & Pla ounds � • • • • • Hos itals • • • • • • Nursin Homes • • • • • • Da care • • • • • • Churches • • • • • � Hazardous Material • • • • • Stora e Flammable Materials • • • • • Stora e Incinerators • • • • • • �verhead utilities • • • • • • Hi Intensi Uses • � • • • • Prohibited Uses * * �7 Densi limited t�-lust compl�� ith a minimtuli of ane t1) of thE f'ollo«�in� criteria: a. The site had water or se�ver stubs installed for future development prior to th� ad�ption of� the Cit�� of Spokane Valle�� initi�l air�art hazard �t�erla�� r��ulations on 2-28-06 b� Ordinance 06-00?: or b. Consistent with adiacent (not across public ri�his ot «�a� propertv sizes for proposed clevelopment: or c. iviore than one residence is located on a properri�. excludin� an�• residence used at one tim� for a dependent rel��ti��z. m�� de��elon Pro�eri�• c�nsistent �L und�rlinin�J z�ne to mal:e COI]f01"Illlil�. �� All final short subdivisions and final subdi� �isions located «�itllin Zc�ne 6 ot tl�e flirport H�►zard O<<erla�• shall contain the foll�«•in� dedication lanuuaQe on the face of the plat "The.se l�ts rn•e lo��utc�cl i�r an .9 ir �ort Il�r�rrr�cl t 11��r1r�1� tl��it r,�ul� b�� rrh 'cc•1 tc� i�7c•rc�usec� �7uise lc�►�els. '' Ordinance 09-005 Modification to Zone 6 in Airport Hazard Overlay (Section 19.110.030) Page 2 of 5 O tion % Table 19-110-1 Air ort Land Use Com atibili � Prohibited Uses Ai ort Land Use Com atibili Zones t?� � Prohibited Uses �;��•c�� ai' Utat� �c�uth �► Ut�h �ven��,e S E, ,a�•enue & �. 1 2 3 4 5 R��tter �►venu� u er s•� Single-famil}' Residential • • � � • � � , a.. � � � ,,,,,.e 1 du/ 5 1 du/ Unclerl��inQ Maximum Densi ** n/a n/a acres 2.5 acre nla 1 du/ 2.5 acre z o n e{�� t Z� Maaufactured Housin Parks • • • • • • • Multi-fam.ily Residential • • • • • • • Schools • • • � • • • Parks & Pla � rounds • • • � • • • Hos itals • • • • • • • Nursin Homes • • • • • • • Davcare • • • • • • • Churches • • • • • • • , Hazardous Material • • • • • Stora e Flammable Materials • • • • • Stora e Incinerators • • � • • • • Overhead utilities • � • • • • • Hi h Intensi � Uses • • • • • • Prohibited Uses * * O Densi limited ,��1ust corr�nl�� «�ith a►»inimum of one (11 of�the 1'0llo��ing criteria: a. "I�he site had ��ater or se�ver shibs installed for future development prior to the adoption c+f� the CitY of S�okane �'� lle�� initi�, air��rt 1��37arc� ��erl:i� re��ulation� c�n ? h� Ordinance 06-002: o� b. Consistent with adiac�nt nat across �uh] ic rigllts �f �� 1 pr�pr:c�t� sizzs f or propos�c� development; ur c. I��ore than one residence is located on a propertY, excluding anY residence used at one time for a dependent relative. ma�� develop propertv consistent ��-ith underlininQ zone to make conformin�. �'`� All final short subdi��isions and final subdivisions Iocated within Zon� G of the Airgort Hazard O��erla�� s�iall COIlf;lltl th� fc,Ilo«�in� ��cii languaee on the fac c► the nlat "These lots ar�� jOLC1tC'(� 11J Ui� t�J r'l•'��''1 1 �`�1=i7" C7� �l'l.'1'li 1� ;,�r » l; ��rrhi� �' �.,'.�: t� 1:(I:Jt' l�'1 � •. Qrdinance 09-0OS Modification to Zone 6 in Airport �-iazard Overlay (Section 19.110.030) Page 3 of 5 � tiOfl ;: Table 19-110-1 Air ort Land Use Com utibili • Prohibited Uses ' ort Land Use Com atibilit � Zones � 6�� Prohibited Uses !�orth vf Utah �a�th of Uc:�l� r� �C. i`. c'1�'�.'AtlE' c� l:. 1 2 3 � 4 S R�itter A�'e ue Rutter At•er:ue Single-family Residential • • � O • O � , a,,, �.c „e�z 1 du/5 1 du/ Llnderi��in� Maximurn Densi ** n/a n/a acres 2.5 acre n/a 1 du/ 2.5 acre zon e��` Manufactured Housin Parks • • • • • • • Multi-family Residential • • • • • • • Schools • • • • • • • Parks & Pla rounds • • • • • • � Hos itals • • • • • � � Nursin Homes • • • • • • • Da �care • • • • • • • Churches • • • • � • • Hazardous Material • • • • • Stora e Flammable Materials • • • • • Stora e Incinerators • • • • • • • Overhead utilities • • • • • • • Hi h Intensit � Uses • • • • • • Prohibited Uses ** � Densi limited n�I«st compl�• ��ith �i 1111111fIlLli11 C�f (�Il� (1 � Of t�lt � �ollo«•ing criteria; d. The site had ��-ater �r s��er stubs installed for future detTelopment prior to tl�e adoption of the City of Spokane �'alle�� initial_air��rt hazard ��•erla�� re�ulations �n 2-?�-Of hti• (�rdinar►ce 06-002; or e. Consistent «lith adjac:�nt (nc�t acr��: �uhlic ri�_hts ��f �t�a�•) ��rc�nr:rt�� iz�� li►r p�c> >�sz�d develot�meat: or f. More than an� residerice is locateci on a prop�c �XC�LII�IIlt? anv r�sid�ncc: useci at one time for a dependent relative. ma�� de��elop pro�ertv consistent ��ith utlderlinin� zone to ma�:e conformine. �` All final short subdivisians and final slibdit�isions located w7tl�in Zane 6 of the .4irpart Hazard Overla�� shall contain the follo��inQ dedication ]anQUa�e c�n the face of the �lat "These lnts nre InCCIlE'(�IIJ Clll :ir��.1�;;�r H�r��v��l (7;•��;�l�j�� tjrr�t »>ni.� bE� srrl.}'��ct t�� irrcrE�as�c�d noise lel�c�ls. " Ordinance 09-005 Modification to Zone 6 in Airport Hazard Overlay (Section 19.110.030) Page 4 of 5 Section Two: The City Council shall initiate a comprehensive plan amendment in 2010 proposing to change the Comprehensive Plan Designation from Low Density Residential to Mixed Use in the area north of Utah Avenue and E. Rutter Avenue. (Option � Section Three: Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrases of this Ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, clause or phrase of this Ordinance. Section Four Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after the publication of the Ordinance, or a summary thereof, occurs in the official newspaper of the City as provided by law. Passed by the City Council this day of . 2009. Mayor, Richard Munson ATTEST: City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Expiration Date: Ordinance 09-005 Modi.fication to Zone 6 in Airpart Hazard Overlay (Section 19.110.030) Page 5 of 5 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY c�Tti� o� MICHAEL F. CONNELLY - CITY ATTORNEY p o ne CARY P. DRISKELL - DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY lle a Y 11707 East Sprague Avenue Suite 103 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.688.0235 ♦ Fax: 509.688.0299 ♦ cityattorney@spokanevalley.org emoran um To: Spokane Valley City Council; Kathy McClung, Community Development Director From: Mike Connelly, City Attorney CC: Karen Kendall, Assistant Planner Date: March 27, 2009 Re: Amendment to Airport Hazard Overlay Amendment I have review the List of contacts regarding Airport Hazard Overlay Code Amendment provided by the Community Development Department. The contacts were made as part of the formal process to review this amendment and clearly constitute "formal consultation" with "airport owners and managers, private airport operators, general aviation pilots, ... and the aviation division of the department of transportation" as required by RCW 36.70.547. Spo°��ane . 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 � 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall�spokanevalley.org emoran um To: Mike Connelly, City Attorney From: Karen Kendall, Assistant Planner Date: March 26, 2009 Re: List of contacts regard.ing Airport Hazard Overlay code amendment (CTA-04-OS). At the City Council I�` reading of 4rdinance 09-00� for the code amendment to the density li.mitations of Zone 6 within the Airport Hazard Overlay (19.110.030), council member Gothmann requested staff to provide all evidence or formal consultation with the parties set forth in RCW-36.70.547. The following is a list of dates and agencies the City has contacted or been � in contact with as part of the City's formal review of the proposed amendment as of today's date. I've also included the dates staff routed documents to agencies requesting comments. Date Contact A en September 16, Routed SEPA for review* 2008 ; September 19, John Shambaugh, WSDOT-Aviation Via phone, conversation ' 2008 Seni�r Planner not documented September 2008 Larry Descbaine, Air Felts Field Tower Via phone, conversation � Traffic Controller not documented October 3, 2008 Sent notice of public hearin * October 10, Issued SEPA 2008 determination* October 14, Carter Timmerman, WSDOT-Aviation In person, meeting not 2008 Aviation Planner documented. October 14, Rya.n Sheehan, Spokane International Sent staff's presentation � 2008 Operations Manager Airport via email for the 10-9-08 study session with Planning Commission C ' October 15, Ryan Sheehan, Spokane International In person, meeting not 2008 eraiions Mana er Ai ort documented October 15, John Shambaugh, WSDOT-Aviation Sent staf�'s presentation 2008 Senior Planner and via ernail for the 10-9-08 Carter Timmerman, study session with PC Aviation Planner October 16, Ryan Sheehan, Spokane International Sent Larry Deschaine's 2008 Operations Manager Airport contact information via email i March 26� 2009 Memo to Mike Coaaelly, City Attoraey Uctober 17, John Shambaugh, WSDOT-Aviation Sent staff report and 2008 Senior Planner; Carter and Spokane presentation via email for Timmernnan, Aviation International Airport the 10-23-08 public Planner and Ryaa hearing with PC � Sheehan, 4perations Mana er October 23, Planning Commissions' WA Pilots Received public 2008 public hearing Association comments* Spokane Airports Tenant A�sociation October 23, Planning Commissions' WSDOT-Aviation Received public 2008 public hearing Spokane International testimony* Airport ' ort Grou s October 31, Neal Sealock, Airport Spokane International In person, meeting not 2008 Director and Ryan Airport documented. Greg Sheehan, Operations McCormick also in Mana er attendance. December 5, Carter Timmerman, WSDOT-Aviation Sent staff report and 2008 Aviation Planner and and Spokane preseatation via email for Ryan Sheehan, International Airport the 12-11-08 continued O erations Man er ublic hearin with PC December 8, Carter Timmerman, WSDOT-Aviation Via phone, conversation I 2008 Aviation Planner not documented Decernber 11, Ryan Sheehan, Spokane International Via phone, conversation 2008 rations er A' rt not documented December 11, Carter Timmerman, WSDOT-Aviation Received comment via 2008 Aviation Planner email.* October 23, Planning Commissions' Received public 2008 continued public testimony* hearin December 12, John Townsley Pilot Via phone, conversation 2008 not documen�d December 16, Carter Timmerman, WSDOT-Aviation Via phone, conversation 2008 Aviation Planner not documented December 16, Ryan Sheehan, Spokane International Via phone, canversation 2008 O erations Mana er A' ort not documented December 29, Carter Timmerman, WSD�T-Aviation Sent sta�'s RCA for 1-6- 2008 Aviation Planner 09 study session with city council via email January 13, Carter Timmerman., WSDOT-Aviation Asked via email if study � 2009 Aviation Planner session allowed public comment. Response was no. January 23, Carter Timmerman, WSDOT-Aviation Via phone, conversation 2009 Aviation Planner not documented Page 2 of 3 March 26, 2009 , Memo to Mike Connelly, City Attorney � January 23, Carter Timmerman, WSDOT-Aviation Requested information if 2009 Aviation Planner city council made a decision. I responded with the directive from city council and listed the dates of the following meetin s on sub' ec�. February 19, John Townsley Pilot Via phone, conversation 2009 not documented Februaryl7, Ryan Sheehan, Spokane Intemational Received accident data via 2009 O rations Mana er Ai rt email* February 17, Sent notification to all 2009 parties of record notifying of CC mt . dates* March 2, 2009 Carter Timmerman, WSDOT-Aviation Via phone, conversation Aviation Planner not documented March 2, 2009 Ryan Sheehan., Spokane International Via phone, conversation � 0 erations Mana er Ai rt not documented ' March 3, 2009 Neal Sealock, Airport Spokane International Via phone, conversation D'uector A' rt not documented March 3, 2009 Carter Tim,merman, WSDOT-Aviation Via phone, conversation Aviation Planner not documented March 5, 2009 Neal Sealock, Airport Spokane International �ia phone, conversation Director Ai rt not documented March 6, 2009 Sent notification to all parties of record notifying of revised CC mt . dates* March 16, 2009 Neal Sealock, Airport Spokane Intemational Received comments for 3- Director ' ort 24-09 CC mt .* March 26, 2009 Carter Timmerman, WSDOT-Aviation Written comments from Aviation Planner presentation at 3-24-09 CC mt . * March 26, 2009 Carter Timmerman, WSDOT-Aviation Via phone, conversation Aviation Planner requesting GIS data to represent proposed solution accuratel . * See attached exhibits � Page 3 of 3 i � i ►J�J`O�li�ine C0�1�IMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT . PL�!►NNING DIVISION SEPA Rotrrn�rG 1v�MOx.a�U Date: September 1 b, 2008 To: City of Liberty Lake, Community Development City of Spokane, Planning Services Town of Nfillwood Spokane County, Building and Planning Spokane County, Division of Utilities - Information Services; Jim Red Spokane Couni}► Fire District No. 1 Spokane Transit Authority (STA) Spokane Re�ional Transportation Conncil Waslvngton State Department of Ecology (Olympia.) Washington State Department of Ecology (Spokane} Washington State Boundary Review Board Washi.ngton State Department of Transportation — Aviation Division Felts Field Airport 4rchard Avenue Irrigation District No. 6 Spokane County Water District No. 3— System No. 1 City of Spokane Water Service Holiday Trailer Court West Valley School District No. 363 Comcast — Rich BarnesBryan Richardson SEFNCO Communications (Consultant to Comcast) — Jarod Duncan Avista — Claude Ka1er Qwest — Don Hartzog I From: Karen Kendall, Assistant Planner City of Spokane Valley, Community Development Department 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suiie 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 PH: 509.688.0172 FX: 509.921.1408 E-MAIL: b.kendall(a�snokanevalle,k�.org SUBJECT: Zoaing code teat amendment to t6e Airport Overlay Zone in table 19-110-1 Please revie�w the attached SEPA Checklist. Submit �vritten comments via email, facsimile, or mail by September 30, 2008 at S:OOum to the attention of the staff person identified above. The City of Spokane Valley is the lead SEPA agency for the environmenial review of the above referenced project. Attachments: SEPA Cbecklist Vicinity Map 11707 E. Sprague • Suitc 106 • Spokane Valle}', WA • 99206 •(509) 9z1-1000 • Fa� (509) 921-1008 i I t- r City of Spokane Valiey SEPA Chedclist TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT City of Spokane Valley SEPA Checkl�st WAC 197-11-960 Environmental checklist ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKUST Purpose of checkllst.• The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all govemmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making dec�sions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for eii proposais with probable signficant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts frorn the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructlons tor appllcanfs: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Govemmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmer�tal impacts of your proposal are sign�cant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly� with the most precise information known, or gnre the best description you can. � You must answer each question accurately and carefuliy, to the best of your knowiedge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you realfy do not know the answer, ar if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not knovw' or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some quesfions ask about govemmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions If you can. If you have problems, the govemmental agencies can assist you. The checklist quesaons apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you subrnit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of cheeklist for non-project pr�posals: Compfete this checklist for non-project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION� COI'1'lplet@ thB SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON-PROJECT ACTIONS (pal't D). For non-project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," t'applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respec#ively. � Note to user. fhfs is an electronic form and each grav bax can be �Iled out on vour computer_ A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable CTA-04-08 2. Name of applicant: City of Spokane Valley 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Karen Kendall, Assistant Planner City of Spokane Valley; 11707 E. Sprague Avenue� suite 106; Spokane Valley, WA 99206 4. Date checklist pr�epared: September 16, 2008 5. Agency requesting checklist: Clty of Spokane Valley Effec#ive October 28, 200T Page 1 of 11 P:1Communtty DevelopmertriDevelopmeM Re�ulationslUpdatesf2008 AmendrnentslCTA-0408 (A0�11. SEPAtCheck(Ist.doc f ..- f _- City of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Code amendment forecasted to be adopted JanuarylFebruary of 2009. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? NIA (f yes, explain. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, direcc:tly related to this proposal. None 9. Do you know whether applica�ons are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? No If yes, explain. 10. List any govemment approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. None 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include addi�onal specific information on project description.) File CTA- 04-08 ts a zoning code text amendment request to reexamine the possibility of removing the density restriction of Zone 6 of the Airport Overtay Zone of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) found In table 19-110-1 (Airport land Use Compatibility Prohibited Uses) with the following options; (a) No change; (b) Allow current zoning denstty in the R- 3 and R-4 zoning districts; or (c) Allow with exception (i) The site had water and sewer stubs Installed for future development prior to the adoption of the City of Spokane Valley initial Airport Hazard Overlay regulations on 2-28-06 by Ordinance 06-002; (il) Conslstent with adjacent (not across public rights of way) property sizes for proposed development; or (iii) More than one residence is located on a property, exc[uding any residence used at one time for a dependent relative, may develop property consistent with undertining zone to make conforming. � 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. �f a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required #o duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The zoning code text amendment to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code which would apply to all residential development within a one (1) mile radius from Felts Field Airport within the City of Spokane Valley limits. 13. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? Yes The General Sewer Service Area? Yes The Priority Sewer Service Area? Yes (See: Spokane County's ASA Overlay zone Atlas for boundaries). 14. The followinq questions sunplement Part A. a. Critical Aquifer Recharge Area (CARA) / Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA). Effective October 28, 2007 Page 2 of 11 P:1Community Development�Deve!opment RegulationslUpdates12008 AmendmentslCTA-Q4-08 (AOZ)11. SEPA1Checklist.doc I � City of Spokane Va11ey SEPA Checklist TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 1. Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposaf of sanitary waste, installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface {indudes systems such as those for the disposal of Stormwater or drainage from floor drains). Describe the type of system, the amount of material to be disposed of through the system and the types of material likely to be disposed of (induding materials which may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result ; of firefighting ac#ivities). N/A ' � 2. Will any chemicals (especially organic sofvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in aboveground or underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quantities of � material will be stored? N/A � � 3. What protective measures will be taken to insure that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored or used on site will not be aflowed to percolate to groundwater? This includes measures to keep chemicals out of disposal systems. WA 4, Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or groundwater or to a Stormwater disposal system discharging to surface or groundwater? N/A b. Stormwater � 1. What are the depths on the site to groundwater and to bedrock (if known)? N/A 2. Will stormwater be discharged into the ground? If so, describe any potentia) impacts. N/A � I Evaluation for Agency Use On1Y � B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1) Earth I a. General description of the site (check one): ❑ flat, ❑ rolling, ❑ hilly, ❑ steep slopes, ❑ mountainous, other N/A b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? N/A ' � c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, day, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, speafy thern and note any prime farm(and. N1A i d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? N/A � � Effective October 28, 2007 Page 3 of 11 P:\Community Developme�tlDevelopmeni Regulations'tUpdates12008 Amend�nentslCTA-04-08 (AOZ)\1. SEPA\Che�klist.doc (- City of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT If so, describe. e. De.scribe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Also indicate source of fill. IV/A f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? N/A If so� generally describe. g. About what percerit of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? NIA h. Proposed measures to r�educe or corrtrol erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: N1A 2) Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally desc�be and give approximate quantities if known. N/A b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? 1�llA If so, generally describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: N/A � 3) Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, salfinrater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. NIA 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. N/A 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. WA Indicate the sou�ce of fill material. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? N1A Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if . known. i 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? N/A If so, note ' location on the site plan. Effective October 28, 2007 Page 4 of 11 P:1Community DevelopmentlDeveiopment RegulationslUpdates12008 Ame�dments\CTA-Q4-08 (A0�11. SEPA1Chedcllst.doc r - �- City of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 6) Does the proposal invoive any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? �UA If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of ' discharge. i I b. Ground: � 1) WIII ground water be withdrawn, or wiil water be discharged to ground water? NIA Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; � industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, � the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. M/A c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of ! collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, ff known). Where will this water flow? �11A � Wll this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? N/A If so, I generally describe. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, ff any:N/A 4) Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: N/A � deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other I ❑ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ❑ shrubs ' � grass � pasture � crop or grain � wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other � water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other � other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? N/A c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. N/A � d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve Effective October 28, 2007 Page 5 of i 1 P:1Community D�velopmentlDeve{opment RegulationslUpdates�2008 AmendmentslCTA-04-08 (A0�11. SEPA1Checklistdac , - ;— i City of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: N/A 5) Animals a. Circie any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: N/A ❑ bircls: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other. ❑ mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other. ❑ fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shel�ish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered speaes known to be on or near the site. NIA c. Is the site part of a migration route? NlA If so, explain. � d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: N/A 1 6). Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. N/A b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. �llA c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? N/A List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: 7) Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? N/A If so, describe 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: NIA b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? N/A � 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. NIA Effective October 28� 2Q07 Page 6 of 11 P:\Community DevelopmentlDevelopment Regulet(onslUpdates12008 AmendmentslCTA-0408 (AOZ)11. SEPA1Checkllst.doc � �-- �- City of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: N/A 8). Land and shoreline use a. What Is the current use of the site and adJacent properties? N1A b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. N/A c. Describe any structures on the site. N/A d. Will any structures be demolished? N/A If so, what? e. What is the currerrt zoning classification of the site? N!A f. What is the currerit comprehensive plan designation of the site? NIA g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? NIA If so, specify. � i. Approximately how many people would neside or work in the completed � projec#? �UA j. Approximatefy how many people wouid the compieted project displace? �VA k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compahble with exis�ng and projected land uses and plans, if any: N!A 9) Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. t�/A b. Approximately how rnany units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. NIA c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10}. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? N/A b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be aftered or obstructed? NIA � EffecUve Odober 28, 2007 Page 7 of 11 ' P:ICommunity DevelopmentlDevelopment RegulationalUpdates12008 AmendmentslCTA-04-08 {A0�11. SEPAIChecklist.doc f- f - City �f Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT � i c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: N/A 11). Light and giare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? N/A What time of day would it mainly occu�l b. Could light or giare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? f�UA c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N!A d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: NIA 12} Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? N/A b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? N/A If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A 13). Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or ne�ct to the site? N1A If so, generally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, ff any: tV/A 14). Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. NIA Show on site plans, if any. b. Is site cuRently served by public transit? NIA If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? NIA How many would the project eliminate? d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to Effective October 28, 2007 Page 8 of 11 P:\Community OevelopmentlDevelopment ReyulatlonslUpdates12008 AmendmerttslCTA-04-08 (AOZ)11. SEPA1Checkfist.doc �— r—� I ` i City of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist I ' TO BE COMPLETEO BY APPUCANT I existing roads or streets, not inciuding driveways? M/A If so, generally , describe (indicate whether public or private). I e. Wtll the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity ofl water, rail, or air transportation? N/A If so, generally describe. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be genereted by the completed � project? N1A If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. i . Pro osed measures to reduce or control trans ortation im acts, if an : N/A 9 p P P Y 15) Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for publlc services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, sch�ols, other)? No If so, generally describe. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impac#s on public services, if any. WA 16) Utilities a. Check utilities currently available at the site: ❑ electricity, ❑ natural gas, Owater, ❑ refuse service, ❑ telephone, ❑ sanitary sewer, ❑ septic system, ❑ other - describe N/A. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. IV/A C. SIGNATURE � The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to ma e its decision. Signature: � � . Date Submitted: September 16. 2008 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON-PROJECT ACTIONS � (do not use this sheet for prolect actions� Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. Effective October 28, 2007 Page 9 af 11 P:1Community DevelopmentlDevelopment RegufetionslUpdates12008 AmendmentslCTA-04-OS (AOZ)11. SEPAICheckl(st.doc r J City of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposai, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to ina discharge to water; emissions to air, production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Each of the three options listied in Section A.11 above, the zoning code text amendment may lead to different impacts associated with the discharge of water, emissions� production, storage or release of toxic or hazardous substances and nolse. a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduoe such increases are: Impacts from any future projects will comply with all applicable regulatory provisions. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The increase in density based upon the three options wiil provide different impacts that may affect plants by their removal and the displacement of animal habitats due to removal of plants. a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Project mitlgation will be required for impacts on a proJect-speclfic basis. Erosion control and water quality regulatory requirements will mitigate any potential impacts to fish or marine life. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Based upon the three optlons in Section A.11 above different impacts may have the potential for an increase in density allowing additional residences that will utilize more energy and natural resources. a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Impacts from any future projects will comply with all applicable regulatory provisions. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for govemmental protection; such as parks, wildemess, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Each of the three options listed in Section A.11 above, the zoning code text amendment may lead to different lmpacts associated with environmentally sensitive areas. a. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: At the time of , development, compllance with regulatory requirements In Title 21 Environment�l Controls of the Uniform Development Code will mitigate impacts to crftical areas. Furthermore, it is a stated goal within the Comprehensive Plan encouraging management of critical areas in such a way that includes education, rehabilitation, preservation, protection, enhancement, mitigation, and incentives for protection. � I � 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would aflow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Based upon the �hree options in Section A.11 above different impacts may have the potential for a maximum of approximately 388 additional resident�al units ff allowed at current density standards. a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: At the time of development� compliance with regulatory requirements in Title 21 Environmental Controls of the Uniform Development Code will mitigate impacts to critical areas. Furthermore, it is a stated goal within the Comprehenslve Plan encouraging management of critical areas in such a way that includes educatio�, rehabilitation, preservation, protection, enhancement, Effective October 28, 2007 Page 10 of 11 P:1Communtty Development�Development Regulations�Updates`�008 AmendmentslCTA-04-08 (AOZ)11. SEPA1Checklist.doc I -- - f - City of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist TO BE COMPLETED BY APPUCANT ( mifigation� and incentives for protection. Additjonally� at the time of development, compliance with regulatory requirements in Title 19 Zoning, Title 20 Subdivisions and Titie 22 Development Standards of the Uniform Development Code will mittgate impacts to land uses, lot size and design and development standards. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public senrices and utilities? Based upon the three options in Sectlon A.11 above different impacts may have the potential for an increase in demand on transportation and/or public serv�ce needs. a. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Impacts frorr� any future projects will compty with all applicable regulatory provisions. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federai laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Any proposed projects resulting from this amendment are , expected to comply with all applicable regulations. � E. SIGNATURE i I, the undersigned, swear under penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to I the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any wiliful misrepresentation or , willful lack of full disclosure on my part, the agency may withdraw any Determination of Nonsignificance ' that it might issue in reliance upon this check list. Date: September 16, 2008 Signature: '�� I Please print or type: Proponent: City of Spokane Valley-Communitv Development Department Address: 11707 E SpraQUe Avenue #106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Phone: �509) 921-1000 Person completing form (if different from proponent): Name: Karen Kendall, Assistant Planner _ � Address: 11707 E. Spraque Avenue #106 Spokane Vallev. WA 99206 Phone: �509� 688-0172 Effective October 28, 200? Page 'I 1 of 11 P:1Cammunity Development\Deve{oprnent Regulallo�slUpdates12008 AmendmentslCTA-04-08 (AOZ)11. SERA1Checkflst.doc . � � 1 � 1 • N•�` �' �„� I � � •• � � � � � � � � � �� ' . / �• .� . � - � � 1 �l 1 � � y � ' � � � jr^ � . ►1� �� '� / /j ►x��II r. j �� / /� � .,�/.�/��°+� / �*i._/ % /';�-' � �/i�+�� . . . ►.��!:�% i� , ,, r��9 � .I/IIiI •. r . _ ,; i �� !'1•I� / �; _ : :. , • `,,� �„ � � i �I r� � � �'. i, �.�.�, •, �'` t1.�rlt� .7:��.:t� . a �' �."� �'f�� i�� /I�r= � � J ► ��r.��!�rir�r ' / �� ►��-.....,..._.._.r�►�� ,,, - .�i.�/��+;�r■ � y/ � F I�''�I/•�i�►�t�ir�� , fI. / �It��►I I/��/r .Il�' �/ V'/.II ��/.�/�I•'�'� ��' ��' �, /, � �� j� //� �� ,.',. ' :' ' //�'�.%i/I��♦ �//I /I � � i a � • � � � � ,� SII � � r �A r �� r �� ri��!•%�%��%�%/ �: - /�,� ' ,.� . •.�. ,:a• � f`'/.��!/ �f :;'� � �� • ► � y � � ,�. � ' .. � � �.'r � � � � "�/,% � �� . � � ' "` . . _ ,�s, � ../�� , - ' �"-_ . _ - -� i �.�- � -- tr■ ��--- � �� r �r �� / / /i/� � � • � � .f%� — � � '' C �!' % � , .� ., , f. '' ��r ..% ��'�� `.. ., r � � �� , � i�////✓' , � .; � �� '� � � �:�?��, � � � . ��r� � /, / �' i //r% ��; .r�.r.��. 1 � ,�;,. . �� • ..r , . �/�:�►�/ . . . ► i.+�► : -- �� ,,,�.�,� . . . � � �,`: • '.r 1 � l � � �' ' � // � � � • � ./►•� . ,�. %��- %/.�' �� i _■ � ,,�.�.��►%•.. _, .�. ,,,. ��r/./I�,r/�-.,�/: ��r — ��'t.�x.•,, ..:,.�— ■� ��i��'- �/ ' �� 1�►/:% %/� � � ' �� %//�, �� /�~ "~�■�� . . + r I � �.�.�iI1I / . .. . � ,1 -� ��- i � � I i 1 _. � 1 S � okane C��vITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT i p ri.,�vlvnvG n�sio�v �alley ROUTING MEMORANDIIM NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Date: October 3, 2008 To: City of Liberty Laka, Community Development City of Spokane, Ptanning Services Town of Millwood Spokane County, Building and Planning Spokane County, Division of Utilities - Information Services; Jim Red Spokane County Fire District No. 1 l Spokaae Transit Authority (STA) ! Spokane Regional Transportation Council ' Washington Stete Departmeat of Ecology (Olympia) Washington State Department of Ecology (Spokane) Washi.ngton State Boundary Review Board Washington State Department of Transportation — Aviation Division Felts Field Airport Orchard A��enue Irrigation District No. 6 Spokane County Water District h'o. 3— System No. 1 City of Spokane Water Service Holiday Trailer Court VVest Valley School District No. 363 Comcast — Rich BaznesJBryan Richardson SEFNCO Communications (Consultant to Comcast) — Jarod Duncan Avista — Claude Kaler Qwest — Don Hartzug From: Karen Kendall, Assistant Planner City of Spokane Valley, Community Development Department 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106 ' Spokane Va]Iey, WA 99206 PH: 509.688.0172 FX: 509.921.1008 E-MAIL: kkendall _.spokanevalley.o� SUBJECT: Zon�ng code tert amendment to the Airport Overtay Zoae in table 19-110-1 Attachments: Notice of Public Hearing Vicinity Map l 11707 E. Sprague • Suite 106 • Spoknne Valtey, WA • 99206 •(509) 921-1000 • Faa (509) 921-1008 � �- 1 o�l��.ne ey� SPOI�:ANE VALLEY PLA1��IING CONIlVIISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING October 23, 2008, 6:00 p.m. i Notice is hereby given that City of Spokane Valley Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on October 23, 2008 at City Hall, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 101 , at 6:00 p.m. (or as soon thereafter as practical), to receive public testimony concerning the following: P�topos�.: The propos�l is to consider amending the densfty Limitations of Section i 19.110.030 (Airport Hazard Overiay) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. j STAFF REPORT AND INSPECTION OF FILE A staff report will be available for inspection ,, seven (7) calendar days before the hearing. The staff report and application file may be � inspected at the Community Development Department Permit Center, located at the City of Spokane Valley City Hall, Suite B-3, 11703 Fast Sprague Avenue, between 8:00 am and 5:00 pni, Monday-Friday, excludi.ng holidays. Copies of documents will be made available at a reasonable cost. ; � Send written comments to the City of Spokane Valley Department of Community Development, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Attn: Karen Kendall, File # CTA-44-08. NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the me�ting who require special assistance to � accornmodate physical, heari.ng, or other impairments, please contact the City Clerk at � (509) 921-1000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made. � � I I I • • / , / � / _ '.l- - � �� ' �� ' / '.Il�� '� �� +�'��' _/' � :.I, �"� • • :.�� ' / � . •�/�it � = J� '.. �' / � ,� � �� '' >' rri��, % /'� � 'r ' � �� '/• ► .►�' / % /� � ��lJD �/ :�..�i � , ; , y . . . 1 f •'; y' � G'/I�:"r/J � I f : � �• •� ��'�=� � �� .. � ��,� �. �,/� ��:,� /� ' � a. ;�' �'�'� � ��I � � , � J c• ! �� , i��/� ��,��'��►/�� a•�a:� �,�r �� - �� ` ..� ..t/�%�, .�� !�� ► .��r.+�✓��ri.r�.r. . � i:�/�� i�� '► � , � / I�►'I� r � � rr,��.�. r�.r.�.r ��r ��%��. �� /rllri/.��ir7 ��i�i�� • � � � r/►I.�r��!�� iil� � +� , � �� r ��!r�/./�% r i i r�� /�//%/ � >� � , ,,. r.�. . ��. - ....��.��rr�..i i• � ,�!� � i.��r� " ,;, �� !��.��`� %�. � �� _ ,�� ►�y� � � � � ' � . ' � +i rJ � � � ��' �� ' ' t r ,, � _� �� /:; � � , .� �� _ � � � + '� s "' � � - �i ,� � �►..- . � , � ��"/�/ ,�� !!..::r�''"� r� �. �,.�' � • �,/r . . . _ � � _,... �,1��/ � �,r � , ,� . . �.� - � � r ...� �� ' • s � r �' r � . ' �� I /�/�� .f , � �; � r � r�; :� r � ti� ��. � / / ,. i�� /, . ,� ,•/,//r�i- ....� .��.r�� - 1 r ;fw � ,� a f �r: �� ' �s4� � r , � 4 � `- � � `, ' • . • • / ,.k � ►� �� k � �� ,.; • �� 'y`��'' ', � �!`.[� .. . � � � �' -'' •�`� � / ' ��' �r�i �, � t � ! � • • • • .� � ►'� , �� '«t i�jn�{,�,�"„C� . r ' • .e . � � � �� :i� rr/./� ��,�� ;"r'„T�-� r � ` - � / . %!/./ /=�%�%� , •/I��! I ;��',� ; ,� ��,� . �� 1 �.�� ' c� . r /I'�''i' • . ' .�� ; , � �� 1://�/./�/I /ir , , r , � - �• �—�r�� • �/�i � - �� • �� '� � %��.�%/.// �� i" �-: ._..�__.��..�. r ..-. ., .r�r� � i + � I i � r ��- — Cv�ZMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPAR`� ��.�.NT ,�`�O��Ile PI�'�NNING DNISION ! �� 11707 E Sgrague Ave Suite 106, Spokane Vallcy WA 9920b 509921.1000 ♦ Fax:509.921.1008 ♦ �itvhall�snok8ncvaLle��.ore � DETERMINATION OF NONSIGIVIFICANCE (DNS) FII.E NuMBER: CTA-04-O8 . DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL Zon�ng code text amendment request to reexamine the possibility of removing the density restriction of Zone 6 of the Airport Overlay Zone of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) found i.n table 19-110-1 (Airport lan.d Use Compatibility Prohibited Uses). APPLICANT: City of Spokane Valley LOCA'IZON OF PROPOSAL: City of Spokane Valley, Washington LEAD AGENCY City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department, Planning Division DETERMINATION Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the City of Spokane Valley Municipal Code, the lead agency has determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environrnent, if mitigated as stipulated below. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead ageacy. This information is az-ailable to the public on request. This DI�TS is issued pursuant to V�'AC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency wzll not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) calendar days from the date issued (below). Comments must be received by this department no later than 5:00 p.m., October 24, 2008. I RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: STAFF CONTACT: �� Kathy McClung, Community Development Director Karen Kendall, Assistant Planner Cit�� of Spokane Valley Community Development City of Spokane Valley Comtnunity Development Department, Planning Division Department, Planning Division �alley Redwood Plaza, 11707 E. Sprague Aveaue, Valley Redwood Plaza, 11707 E. Sprague Avenue, Suite 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 9920b PH: (509) 688-0030 / FX: (509) 921-1008 PH: (509} 688-0172 / FX: (509) 921-1008 kmcclung@spokanevalley.org kkendallCspokanevalley.org D�TE ISSUED: October 10, 2008 SIGNATU�tE: C APPEAL An appeal of this determination must be submitted the Community velopment Department within fourteen (14) calendar days af�er the date issued. This appeal must be written and make specific factual objections to the City's threshold determination. Appeals shall be conducted in conformance with Section 11.10.170 (Appeals) of the Cifiy's Environmental Ordinance, and the req,uired fees pursuant to the City's adopted Fee Schedule shall be paid at time of appeal submittal. Pursuant to Section 11.1 U.170.3 of the City's ± Interim Environmental �rdinance, appeals shall be limited to a review of a final threshold determination. a i f Detcrminatian ofNon-Significana i CTA-Q4-08 I October 10, 2048 Copies of this DNS were mailed to: City of Liberty Lake, Community Development � City of Spokane, Planning Services I Town of Millwood . ' Spokaae County, Buildi.ng and Plantung Spokane County, Division of Utilities - Information Services; Jim Red ! Spokane County Fire District No. 1 Spokane Transit Authority (STA) Spokane Regional Transportation Council Washington State Department of Ecology (Olympia) Washington State Department of Ecology (Spokane) Washi.ngton State Boundary Review Board Washington State Department of Transportation — Aviation Division Felts Field Airport Orchard Avenue Irrigation District No. 6 Spokane County Water District No. 3— System No. 1 City of Spokane Water Service I Holiday Trailer Court West Valley School District No. 363 Comcast — Rich BarnesBryan Richardson SEFNCO Communications (Consultant to Comcast) — Jarod Dunca.n I Avista — Claude Kaler Qwest — Don Hartzog I � Yaga 2 of 2 f � I I ( S`po°��ane Valley C4MMUNITY DEVEL4PMENT DEPA►RTMENT PLANNING DIVISION I 11707 E Spraguc Ave Suite 106; Spokane Vallcy WA 99206 509.921.1 d00 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ ci ("�pokanevallc r.�o ,rg ( � LEAD AGENCY ENVIROi NTAL C`HECKLIST REVIEW , DATE: October 10, 2048 A. BACKGROUND 1. PRO�cT Nu��Ex: CTA-04-08 2. DESCR�oN: Zoning code text amendment request to reexamine the possibility of removing the density restriction of Zone 6 of the Airport Ov�rlay Zon.e of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) found in table 19-110-1 (Airport land Use Compatibility Prohibited Uses). 3. APPLICArtT: City of Spokane Valley 4. LoCaTTON: Apply to all residential development within a one (1) mile radius from Felts Field Airport within the City of Spokane Valley li.mits. City of Spokane �'alley October 10, 2008 Determination of I�Ton-Significance (DNS) Pagc 1 of 4 CTA-04-08 (Non-Projcct Action) I I ( REVIEW OF SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONS OF SECTION 14 OF PART A(BACKGROUND� FOR CxrrtcaL AQu�� RECa��xGE Ax�A (CARA) / AQu�Ex S�.lvsrrivE �A (ASA) � The ro sal lies within the A uifer Sensitive Area ASA . Staffnotes stoanwater will be reviewed P Po Q � ) and addressed through the City's adopted 2001 Spokane County Road Standards. No concerns noted. B. ENVIItOr�MENTAL ELEMEN'I`S Ital�cs indicate potential mingation measures, if any. Bold indicates unresolved issues or additional information that must be addressed by the applicant prior to final apprvval, as indicated. 1. E�t� No impact to th�se areas is anticipated. No concerns noted. 2. Agt ' The SEPA Checkl.ist states there will be no emissions into the air. IvTo concerns noted. � 3. WAr�t The SEPA Checklist s#ates that the proposal will not create any discharge into water. No concerns noted. 4. Pt.�rrrs The Checklist states that increased densities may lead to the removal of vegetation and displace habitat. Not other impacts to plants, animals, fish or marine life is predicted. No concerns noted. ' 5. A►r1nv�Ls The Checklist states that increased densities may lead to the removal of vegetation and � displace habitat. Not other impacts to plants, animals, fish or mari.ne life is predicted. No concerns noted. 6. ETIERGY AND NANRAL RESOURCES No impact to these areas is anticipated. No concerns noted. ' 7�. E?�rvlxorr��r�. HEa�..� H[AZ��s No impact to these areas is anticipated. No concerns noted. ' 7B. NOISE I No impact to these areas is anticipated. No concerns noted. � 8. SHORELINE AND LAND USES No i.mpact to these areas is anticipated. No concerns noted. 9. Housnva City of Spokanc Vallcy Octobcr 10, 2008 Dctcrmination of Non-Significance (DNS) Pege 2 of 4 � C'TA-04-08 (Non-Pmjcct Acdon) i { � � The Checklist states there may be a potential of 388 more dwelling units. No concerns , noted. � 10. AES�Tics � No impact to these areas is anticipated. No concerns noted. '� � 11. L.IGx�r Arrn G� � No impact to these areas is anticipated. No concerns noted. � 12. REC��ox ' No i.mpact to these areas is anticipated. N o concerns noted. 13 . CULTURAL AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION No impact to tllese areas is anticipated. No concerns noted. I� 14 . T�ANSPORTATION Checklist states that no unpact is anticipated to transportation and public services. No � concerns noted. 15 . PUBLIC SERVICFS No impact to these areas is anticipated. No concerns noted. 16. UTn.rr�s No impact to these areas is anticipated. No concerns noted. � REVIEW OF SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON-PROJECT ACTIO'vS I i i 1. Agt � The SEPA Checklist states tliere will be no emissions into the au. No concerns noted. 2. WATER The SEPA Checklist states that the proposal will not create any discharge into water. No concerns noted. 3. PI.AxTS & Axttv�Ls The Checklist states that increased densities may lead to the removal of vegetation and displace habitat. Not other impacts to plants, animals, fish or marine life is predicted. No concerns noted. 4. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES Depletion of energy or natural resources is not anticipated. No concerns noted. 5. ENVIROT�MEN"TAL SENSITIVE 1�REAS Na impact to these areas is anticipated. No concems noted. Ciry of Spokane Valley Uctobcr 10, 2008 I Dctcrmination of Non-Significance (DNS) Pagc 3 of 4 CTA-04-03 (Non-Project Action) i � � � � � E. SHORELRIE AND LAND USES Any development within shoreline areas would require conformance with existing shoreline �, regulations. No concerns noted. � 7. T�tANSPORTATION & PUBLIC SERVICES � Checklist states that no impact is anticipated to transportation and public services. No � concerns noted. 8. Conflicts with local, state, or federallaws requirements for protection of the environment None anticipated. No conceras noted. I City of Spokane Valley Octoher 10, 2008 I Determ'snation of Non-Significancc (DNS) Page 4 of 4 C'fA-04-08 (Nan-Project Actian) � , l � I � � � � :'� _� 1 �` ^. 4'��'t 0 - ' �� --�_�.- � �-�._ � I October 23, 2008 Planning Commission City of Spokane Valley 11707 East Sprague Avenue Spokane, WA 99206 Dear Planning Commission Members, "�'he Spokane Chapter of the VWashington Pilots Assooiation is pleased to have the opportuaity to comment on the proposal to amend the density limitations of Section 19.110.030 (Airport Hazard � � Overlay) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. Our chapter represents pilots throughout the Spokane area and is a component of a state-wide association that represents pilots throughout the State of Washington. Our mission is to advance the interests of general aviation in oVashi.ngton State. Community airports are community assets and as such must be protected! The most recent Washington State Department of Transportation — Aviation Division Airport Data and Facilities information from 2001 found that 320 aircra�ft are based et Felts Field, including 28l single-engine, 22 multi-engine piston-powered, 4 turbojets, and 13 helicopters. Their data found that there were a total of 70,669 annual operations. This represents 22% more annual op�rations than the 57,362 annual operations that occur at Spokane International Airport. I would like to add that on a typical day both parallel runways at Felts Field are utilized extensively, which enhances both efficiency and safety. In this same report, the WSDOT-Aviation Division economic analysis of Felts Field identified an economic benefit of 250 jobs resulting in over $4.5 million dollars in labor earnings and economic acti��ty to the community approachi.�ag nearly $16.5 million on an annual basis. Add.itionally, Felts Field is one of only five "Reliever Airports" in the State of Washington, and as such plays an important part in the transportation infrastructure of the State. It is our understanding that the Airport Hazard Overlay was originally adopted by Spokane Valley's City Council to establish land use compatibility zones restricting certain land uses in pro�umity to Felts Field. To allow an increase in the allowable residential density within the airport overlay zone is not a reasonable land use. The consequences of such a move would be to potentially i.ncrease the risk of future noise, operational and liability issues which potentially puts the viability of Felts Field, a commuoity asset approaching $16.5 million annually, at risk. I�'urthermore, with the volume of flight operations occurring annually at Felts Field, it seems incomprehensible to consider a move to allow an increase in population density under the airport overlay zone. Consequently, it is the position of the Spakane Chapter of the Washington Pilots Association that stewardship principles appropriate for this important commuaity asset require that a comprehensive analysis and input from all sources must be taken into consideration when making such a critical decision. Consequently, the Washin�toa Pilots Association — Spokane Chapter, respectfully reqnests thnt the Comm.ission delay its decision oa this matter to aUow time for comprehensive and collaborative research and input. � � r' Thank you ior the opportunity to comment. �1'he Spokane C,hapter of tlle V� a.Shingte�n Pilots Association would welcome the opportunity to participate in future discussions on this topic. Sincerely, ��n r� L Gary White I. Blake McKinley, Jr. Presideat Treasurer; President 2006 V�jashington Pilots Association — Spokane Chapter cc: SATA EAA Chapter 79 Spokane Airport Board Washington Pilots Associ�tion � j � October 23, 2008 Planning Commission ' City of Spokane Valley 11707 East Sprague Avenue , Spokane, WA 99206 Dear P(anning Commission Mernbers: � � The Spokane Airports Tenants Association appreciates the opportunity to comment on the proposal to I amend the density (imitations of Section 19.110.030 (Airport Hazard Overlay) of the Spokane Valfey Municipa) Code. � Our organization, formed in 1994, represents 130 tenants at Felts Field who lease land at the airport to , support a business, operate aircraft or both. Our mIssion is to pratect and promote the viability of Felts . Field as an important commun�ty asset. As you may know, Felts Field is one of only five "Reliever , Airports" in the State of Washington, and as such plays an important part in the transportation , infrastructure of the State. The most recent Washington State economic analysis for the airport identifres an economic impact of more than $16 million annually. We are aware that the Airport Hazard Overlay was originally adopted by Spokane Valle�s City Council to establish land use compatibility zones restricting certain land uses in proximity to Felts Field. We believe that increasing residential density within the airport overlay zone is not a reasonable land use and potentially increases the risk of future noise, operational and liability issues which may put the airport at risk. We believe that stewardship principles appropriate for this important community asset require that a comprehensive analysis and input from all sources must be consldered when making such an important decision. Therefore, SATA respectfully requests that the Commtssion deloy its decision on this motter, and that the Commisslon ollow more time for comprehensive and collaborotive research ond inpu� Thank you for the opportunity to comment. We welcome the opportunity for SATA to participate in future discussions on this topic. Sincerely, ��'itJC� leff Hamilton � President Spokane Airports Tenants Association � � i � I I � i i � � , Spokane Valley Planning Commission Draft Minutes Council Chambers — City Hall, 11707 E. Sprague Ave. October 23, 2008 I. CALL TO ORDER The Chairperson Robertson called the meeting to order at 6:00 pm. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance III. ROLL CALL Commissioners Beaulac, Carroll, Eggleston, Robertson, Sands and Sharpe were present. Commissioners Kogle was absent and excused. � Staff attending the meeting: Kathy McClung, Director of Community Deve{opment; Greg McCormick, Planning Manager, Lori Barlow, Associate Planner; Deanna Griffith, Administrative Assistant. N. APPROVAL OF AGENDA It was moved by Commissloner Carroll, seoonded by Commissioner Sands, to move SN-02- 08 to item one on the agenda. It was unanimously agreed to accept the October 23, 2008 agenda as amended. V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was decided to approve the minutes at the next meeting. Vl. PUBLIG COMMENT There were no Public Comments. � VII. COMMISSION REPORTS Commissioner Robertson stated that he attended a pan handling committee meeting and that the Mayor is looking for the commitfiee to make regional presentations. There were no other Commissioner reports. VIII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS , Director McClung stated that the Council has changed the recommended location of City Hall from the original proposed location. Mr, Kersten, Public Works Director has determined it would be better suited based on street design, for the City Hall to occupy a parcel to the east of the previous location and negotiations would continue on the new site proposal. Council is also I going to be discussing the traffic circulation issue relating to the SpraguelAppleway Revitaliza6on Plan at the next Tuesday meeting, Oct. 28, 2008 The Director also stated that Council reviewed and emergency code amendment regarding surveying issues. IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS New Business — PubUc Hearing, SN-02-08� street vacation of approx. 390 feet of 5�' Ave between Newer and Progress Rd. Commissioner Robertson opened the public hearing at 6:04 p.m. Associate Planner Lori Barlow made a pnesentation to the Commission regarding the location, vicinity, the conditions on the ground and surrounding areas. There is a house focated on the �roperty that would have been 5"' Ave at the end just west of Newer Rd. It was explained that 5 Ave. will probably never be able to go all the way through, based on the house befng IocaEed at this intersection. Nis. E3�rla�.v stat�d that a p!at, Short-Plat-17-08. �vhich has received ��e!iR�inar, anproval to 10/Z3/2008 Plar�ning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 6 i divide a parcel we�t of the proposed vacation which will require improvement to one half of 5�' Ave. abutting the new parcel. Ms. Barlow reviewed the criteria for approving the street vacabon. Staff's recommenda6on is that the vacation be denied because the street could be used to serve future development. � Pubfic Works has also recommended denial for connectivity issues in the future. Arnfe Woodard, 2511 S. Best Rd, Mr. Woodard stated that he has represented Mr. Elliott in the past, Mr. Elliott is the property owner of the western finro parcels in the proposed area. Mr. Woodard stated that it would make more sense to put a street through north and south instead of east and west, when there would be no possible way to complete 5�' Ave all the way through, with the house that sits right in the way. Mr. Woodard stated that Mr. Elliott is intending to put a street through north and south not east and west Chair closed the public hearing at 6:1 g pm. Ms Barlow stated that Deve(opment Engineering and Public Works were aware of Mr. Elliot's proposal for his 4,parcels due to a pre-app meeting he has alread� had with the City At that time they recommended that S� Charles be put through from 4 to 6�' Ave., with 5`" Ave. still providing a connection from Progress Rd. It is still the opinion of both departments that the right-of-way for 5' Ave. is needed would still be beneficial to provide access to the back of the other two lots to the east of Mr. Elliot's for redevelo�ment. , Atthough a turn-around for the fire department wouki still need to be provided even if 5 Ave were extended. It is still both departments' opinions that the right--of way for 5�' Ave needs to remain in place. Commissioner Beaulac wanted to know if they could make a condition on the street vacation if it was approved they would require St. Charles to be put through as a cross street. Director McClung said the Commission can not place a condition on the sVeet vacation that relates to future development There was discussion regarding the turn around required for the short plat to the west of the requested street vacation. The short plat has preliminary approval, it is required to make half street improvements, and a fire turn-a-round is being planned on the property however if the street vacation were approved, a full cul-de-sac would likeiy be a condition of the vacation for a tum around, per Public Works. Commissioner Sands made a motion to recommend denial of the SN-02-08, street vacation of a portion of 5� Ave. Commissioner Eggleston seconded the motion. Discussion began, regarding the following condifions: there was no reason to not vacate, there will be no way to continue 5�' Ave. all the way to Newer Rd., if we vacate, there is nothing to hold the developer to building a northlsouth road, the road extension issue could be handled at the time of plat application and the developer would be held to conditions made at that time, , 5`" Ave. is going to dead end one way or another, why not at the intersection of St Charles, and not against Mr. E11iot's properties. There was concem about the impact to other lots, more in favor of half of a vacation, without a vacation they can not develop the lots, the developer gains from the vacation, put a turn around at the intersection of St Charles with 5�', get half the vacation, give up half and get better connectivity all the way around. There would be an out to Progress, 4�' and 6�'. And there would be a turn-around for the fire department. Vote is three in favor and three opposed. Motion fails. Planning commission will send it forward to City Council with no recommendation. New Business — Public Hearing, Unlform Development Code Amendment, Title 19, 19.110.030, Airport Hazard Overlay ' Commissioner Robertson opened the public hearing at 6:28 p.m. Planning Manager Greg McCormick gave a presentation regarding the history of the airport overlay zone. Mr. McCormick also discussed issues with the zone overiay, zone 6 is basically suppose to relate to a noise reduction issue, and the basis for the discussion for the evening. Currently the zoning in zone 6 is one dwelling unit per 2.5 acres. The options for changing the density in the overlay zone are: Option 1 No Change and leave the density where it currently is 10/23/2008 Planning Cornmission Minutes Page 2 of 6 � {._ �ption 2 Allow density of current zoning within Zone 6 of the Airport Hazard Overiay (AOZ Airpo�t Overiay Zone) zone. � Option 3 Allow density to be limited to the R-2 zoning district regulations within zone 6 Option 4 Allow density of underlying zone within Zone 6, however devefopment must comply with a minimum of one (1) of the following criteria; a. The site had water and sewer stubs installed for future development prior to the adoption of the City of Spokane Valley initial airport hazard overlay regulations on 2-28-Ofi by Ordinance 06-002; b. Contiguous parcel with a minimum lot size less than or greater to underlying zone. c. More than one residence is located on a property, excluding any residence used at one time for a dependent rela�ve, may develop property consistent with underiining zone to make conforming. Op6on 5, which was requested by the Planning Commission at the study session to leave the density north of Trent the way that it is and south of Trent at the under lying � zoning. Commissioner Sharpe had requested information regarding vacant parcels, he wanted to know how many vacant parcels there were in the AOZ , The planning staff was able to provide the information, ihere are 80 parcels but staff can not tell�what condition those parcels are in. Staff was also able to tell that there were seven dividable lots, once again not being able to tell who owns them or their oondition. StafPs recommendation is stilf option 4, allow the underiying density within zone 6, with the listed criteria. The Commissioners had several questions before they began the public tes6mony. How did st�ff come to the criteria listed? !t is c/ose to the criter�a used for rezoning purposes. Why ' wasn't this research done previously? Why isn't it water and sewer? Did we hear back from the FAA as requested? Yes, they did respond and staff did meet wfth them. Did we do any noticing of the area regarding the possibi(ity of changing the density then or now? Commission , began the public testimony. Ryan Sheehan� 2303 S Tekoa S�: Mr. Sheehan stated he was representing the airport Mr. Sheehan requested that the Commission post pone any action or choose Option 1. Mr. Sheehan stated that the Airport Board would like more time to review the impacts of the changes. The director, Mr. Neil Seelock, is asking for more time to consider proposed changes based on more which should be considered more on noise in the community as well as safety. Mr. Sheehan sfated that the first the Airport Board heard about the proposed changes was mid last week, after receiving a call from Ass� Planner Karen Kendall. The Airport Director did not feel they had enough time to present what it would like to offer in the way of educaaon regarding activity increases. Commissioner Eggleston asked how much time more time did they fhink they need? Mr. Sheehan stated they thoughr 30 days. A Commissioner asked if the airport received notice. A notice of public hearing was sent however there Is no administrative statf af felts �eld and all adminisUative work gets passed out to Spokane Internafiona/ Alrpori: Jeff Hamilton, 3305 S High Drive: Mr. Hamilton stated he is the president of the Tenants � Association for Felts Feld, business or airport. It is the TenanYs Association to protect the airport. Mr. Hamilton stated that they have submitted a letter stating their position. The Tenant's Association is aware of airports closing more around the country. Mr. Hamifton wanted to c�mmend the City for its standards, for the FAA and WADOT for being concemed about increasing density when it is not reasonable. Mr. Hamilton stated he is ooncemed about putting the airpo�t at risk. Mr. Hamilton would like to ask for a comprehensive analysis, and respectfully ask to postpone this decislon. Gary White, 10405 E Ferret Drive: Mr. White stated he was president of the Washington Pilot Association. Mr. White requested that the Cornmission adopt option 1 to postpone this 10/23/2008 Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of b � �-- discussion in order to get more information regarding this regulation. Mr. White would like to encourage not to increase density around the airport. Mr. White has stated that he as seen other airports shut down because of density. Bill Faith, T719 E Current Pt.: Mr. Faith stated that he owns a parcel which would be a little less than 3 lots which have sewer stub and water. Mr. Faith stated that he would understand if he wanted to build high rise in the flight path, but if you are concerned about the safety then worry about the houses across the river. Mr. Faith stated that there are trees and everything across the river, he does not see any reason for restrictions in this area. Carter Timmerman, Arlington, WA, WADOT: Mr. Timmerman stated he was an airport sponsor and that he supports Mr. Sheehan's request for more time. Mr. Timmerman also made an offer of assistance in the planning process. Mr. Timmerman said that most accidents occur within 5000 feet of the runway. Density in this zone does offer a risk, but the noise is the larger concem. Commissioners asked if any noise surveys done on thaf area, none thaf anyone was aware of. Larry Tobin, 8610 E Red Oak Dr.: Mr. Tobin stated that he felt that the airport very important. Mr. Tobin said he fett the airport carrot for the area and would not like to see the airport go away because people don't like the noise. Mr. Tobin stated that what the Commission was talking about zoning the around the airports, and asked that they give careful consideration to these regulations. Blake McKinnley, 4015 S Sunnerland: Mr. McKinnley stated he is an officer of the Chapter of WA State Pilots Assoc. Mr. McKinnley shared the airport data for Felts Field 70,fi69 annual flight operations which represents 22°lo more flight operations than Spokane Intemational Airport. Both runways are used extensively on a daily basis. WADOT has stated that the economic beneftt Fe(ts Field provides to the area is 250 jobs resufting in $16.5M dollars in labor and economic value to the community on a annual basis. Mr. McKinnley stated that the Associations understand for the adoption of the AOZ and restricting certain land uses and density was to protect the airport and airport safety. By allowing density increase in the area, is not reasonable land use. The potential adoption would allow increase in noise and liability issues which potentially puts the asset of the airport at risk_ The Association requests that the Commission delay its decision for more collaboration and a comprehensive approach for all parties to study this subject further. Mike Klein, Manager Orchard Ave Water District, 917 S Bowdish: Mr. Klein stated that it seems to me like the battle with the Water District and the patrons is with the airport not the City. Mr. Klein said this was new to him. Mr. Klein stated in the past the only restrictions have been height and radio frequency. Noise and density were a recommendations, this ordinance was acted on a recommendation. Mr. Klein stated he was here to inform the Commission that this decision has a big impact on the water district. Wth out an increase in density there will be no future growth. The density along the airport was UR-3.5 in the county. The safety zone does not want schools, .parks, large gatherings of peopfe and yet there are all of these things in the overlay zone already. Mr. Klein stated tfiat on one is trying to destroy the airport, there has never been an +ncident tf�ere, but overkill hurts people. People are being hurt by the restrictions in this ordinance, hope the Commissioners can see this. Jeff Howe, 7101 E. Rudder: Mr. Howe stated that the City of Spokane Valley has been losing revenue by not allowing these lots to be divided. Mr. Howe stafed that around the airport in Deer Park you are required to sign off a statement recognizing you are in a an airport zone, you must sound insulate you f�ome and giving certain rights to the airport because you live in and around tfie airport zone. None of that has been implemented by the City of Spokane airport, the airport has a business to run, but the City of Spokane Val(ey. Mr. Howe said he bought a property in 2006, he asked if it could divide it before he bought it, asked counry if he could get extra sewer stubs, water stubs from Orchard Ave., he even got a building permit for a building on the property, which is much smaller than he would have built otherwise. Mr. Howe said he made several trips down to the City and he was never told he could not divide his property, paid more for the property than he would have, the City is missing the revenue. Mr. Howe stated he 10/23/z008 Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 6 � ( "- thought that the change had been railroaded through the first time, when even the water district does not know about it six months after, he fett the Commissioners should side with the Ilttle people. James Bower: Pilots Association. Mr. Bower stated that he f�eit the Commission should choose option 1. Mr. Bower said he felt that the Commission should advise Council to pcotect the people living here. Talking about zone 6 is talk�ng about noise, flying between 1000 - 800 feet is fairfy noisy, tfie noise is less at 1000-1500. Mr. Bower suggested that the Commissioners consider the job is to protect from noise. If you look to the future, some new home buyers may not realize the airport not there, even though airplanes are there 24 hours a � day. Mr. Bower said even though we are talking about a housing only, this industry supports i the schoots, snow plows and other important activity in the City � Dwight Hume� 9101 Mt View Lane: Mr. Hume stated he didn't understand agencies coming to ask for more time, this is not about increase density. Mr. Hume stated he belived that Option 4 i reasonable, without further analysis. Under regulafions, extra insulation can be required for ' noise suppression, new permit holders should have to sign an easement waving for noise.. Mr. Hume stated he felt that if the airport felt this was going to be damaging to them then they should have to come back with help and prove why the net increase is damaging, and could cause the cfosure of the airport. Joe Coleia, 8112 E Marietta: Mr. Coleia stated got letter from Marina (Marina Sukup, former Director) stating he would be able to divide the property or he would not have bought iG Mr. Coleia stated he had a lot of money invested in a Iittle house and a lot that he can not split Mr. Coleia stated he was upset that he had a letter that said he could do something we later said he could not do. The lot has sewer and waber. Mr. Coleia stated he did not think �f he split his lot, it would be any smaller than any other lot on the street � Sara Orrange� Spokane Realtor Association� 9124 N. Ash: Ms. Orrange stated she was the Govemment Affairs Director for the Spokane Realtors, which advocates housing options and not restricting housing choices. Ms Omange stated that option 4, whlle it allows for housing density with some restrictions, it does not allow for as much as many housing opportuni�ies, as some of the other options do. Ms. Orrange also stated it did not allow for the opportunities as the underlying zoning or what is allowed in the City of Spokane. Jeff Mclntire 3816 N Park Rd.: Mr. Mcln�re stated he lives at the end of the runway and has no problems with the airport Mr. Mclnrire purchased his property to divide, it has water and sewer, he is also a board member for Orchard Ave. Water District Mr. Mcln6re stated that he � is aware that planes make noise� he has lived in this area for 33 years and never had an issue with the noise. Mr. Mclntire did state he was concemed that there had been no proper notice to concemed parties. Pam Mclntire, 3816 N Park Rd.: Ms. Mclnnre stated that the Airport was a great neighbor. She also said that they like the airport, but that some of our properties are dividable, we want to be to do tha� Ms. Mclnare wondered why are we trying to char�ge it now, when there have always been people there? � John Stipe, 2820 N Center Rd.: Mr. Stipe stated that the airport wou{d never going to make ' much noise. He said they can't bring in 4 engine jets, there is not enough runway length. Mr. Stipe stated he used to fly fighters but tfiey had practiced to land the fighters Felts Field for a while however the runway is too short and there is no room to expand it, after Northwood was buift they never used it again. Mr. Stipe talked about the new gyms at VWHS, and the people using the school. Mr. Stipe stated that the airport does not fly multiple flights out of there after 10 p.m. at night He stated that the most noise in the neighborhood comes from the railroad. Mr. Stipe stated he had enough land to divide, and believes he should be able to do so if he ' chooses. Sharon Panther, 8004 E Glass: Ms. Panther stated she had not received any information on this overlay. Ms. Panther stated she has sort of an acre. She stated that the county stated that the property could not be divided until sewer was in the area. Ms. Panther stated now she has � 10/23/2008 Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 6 I � i i I f I I I the udlities she was told now she can not divide the property now. Ms. Panther stated she � asked the City is the change had been mandated by sorne other entity but couid not get a satisfactory answer and would like the ability to divide her property. . ' John Dikes, 73Z3 E Marietta: Mr. Dikes stated he likes the airplanes, but if you stop the growth the water district needs growth to keep the costs down. He also stated he fe�t that growth spawned improvement in existing development. Mr. Dikes does not feel the noise of the airplanes is bothersome, he finds the trains far noisier than the airport. Mr. Dikes also has a lot he could improve and divide if allowed. Commissioner Beaulac asked Mr. Dikes if he were ro develop his extra lot would he be willing fo sign a waiver for the airport noise and provide the � extra insulation for the noise suppression. Mr. Dikes responded that efthough he would be � willing he was surprised fhat the airport noise was a problem for anyone, the railroad noise far out weighted the planes. Raymond Gunning 6215 N Thierman: Mr. Gunning stated he has a full packet, got had a letter from Marina Sukup, had the engineering done, sewer, brought in to submit it, can`t do it � Mr. Gunning stated that he was in agreement with the land owners, as far as the airport, he has grown up in Millwood, and sells real estate, with the understanding that you have to enjoy tfie planes, trains and automobiles. Mr. Gunning stated he would never want to harm the airport but he also does not want to harm the water district Commissioner 8eaulac asked Mr. Gunning if he would be willing to sign an agreemenr, and puf in fhe noise abatement features. Mr. Gunning stated he would sign it and belleved that the last 10 houses he has sold, that one of his customers would have a problem signing it either. The P{anning Commission took a break and on their retum, Director. McClung clarified the I surrounding some of the questions and issues of the airport overlay zone. The Director also � explained how the amendment would proceed through the City Council process. Commissioner Eggleston made a motion to confinue the public hearing to Dec. 11, 2008, with a second by Commissioner Sands. Vote is unanimous in favor. X. GOOD OF THE ORDER Commissioner Robertson stated that the Council would be discussing Water Quality at the next Council meeting. XI. AD70URNMENT The being no other bus(ness the meeting was adjoumed at 8:07 p.m. SUBMITT�ED: APPROVED: Deanna Griffth, Administraave Assistant Ian Robertson, Vice-Chairperson 10/23/2008 Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 6 f i � . � -- f � � Washington State Aviation Divislon Departrr�ent of Transportation s�oa �72nd str�et Suite K2/ P.O. Box 3387 Paula J. Hammond� P.E. Arlingtan, Washi�gton 98223 Sec�etary of Transportation 368-651-s3441��-�9 TTY: 1-800�88� www.wsdotwa.gov December 10 2008 �� ' � (' � i ��'� �� ;'C)iCA�!� VALL�Y PIaII�IIg Commission p�apE�Twl�t�T �� T City of Spokaao Valley � ; �finr,��t.��•i'� �� 1] 707 East Sprague Av�eaue, Suite 106 Spokane Valley, Washin.gtvn 99206 RE: CTA-04-08, ProPosed amendmonts to Spokane Valley's airport overiaY, municipal code soction 19.110.U30 Dear Planning Commission Members, I 'Ibank you for the opporhwity to provide comment on the proposed density altc�natives for zone 6 orf the Eity o#' Spoksne V$�tey's eirpa�t overlay regnlations. The Washington Stada Departmcnt of Tremsportation (WSDOT) Aviation Division rccognizes the City of Spokane Valley's past P�8 achievements, and encauragc�s its continued diligence in discanraging the �raachme� of inoo�mp�hble iand uses adjacent Lo Felts Fieid. WSDOT Aviabion is concemcd that substamtial increases in allowablc residential dansities in zone 6 of the airport overlay will affect the long- term op�'ational v�aUility of Fetis Field and ther�fore wonld recommend ibat the Planning Commission deny tha raquest or tabla tha proposal vntil a full anatysis of all the issues set farth h�ein can be addressed. In 1996, Washington Stats pa.ssed land use legislation (RCW 36.70A,510, RCW 36.7454�_ Undcr this ''an of the Growth ent Act GMA. all cities and counties are prcma M�nagem ( �, taw�s, requinod to discourage encroachment of incompatible development ad,�acent to public use airports, through adoptic�a of comprehonsive p�an policies end dev�elopmeat ragu�tivns. (�IA alsa identifies airports as c�sseatial public facilities. WSDOT Aviation has concluded that options 2 throngh 5 are in direCt �contradiction with the requit�emeiris of G3�iA. Eac� of the altern8iives pr�seat+ed, with the exception of option 1, allows for substantial encroachment of residenti.al development on Felts Field. Additionally, the review did nat add�ss or analyze the operatio�l characteristics of the airport, futvrc operations, ar im�pacts which is a fimdau�� requirement of GMA bv `�Show your worl�'. WSDOT Aviation offe�s the following observations aad cvmments. I 4ptions 2 t�rougii 5 would allow for subs�tial ea of r�sideniial development on � �elts Field. This pramotion of incx+eased singla family residential wit�ia the sIIpart influence area will most likely re.sult m conflict end diminished quality of life for people living under the aircraft traffic pariern. Residents wiihin the a,irport iaflneace ares of Felts Fie�d will be ex�osed to aoise, � light, vi'bra#ioa an� fumcs associated with normal avport operations. One should also eXpect t�at as the demand for s'v transportaiion increases, so will the imbensity of use at Fe�s Field. As seen in the past, adjsoent residendal development incr�ases the operational !c�a�s of an airport by ��B �P�� tigation snd chang�s in established app�oach, departume and en mute Procednres. 1 � �- - �- I i WSDOT Aviation bclieves that adoption of eny of thcse albornatives wou�d con�ute a failuro of enforciag RCW 36.70AS 10 gnd the city's own comp�ehensive plan that disconraj8'e encrn�chmeat of incompatible land uses adjaceat ta Felts Fi�ld. Acxordingly the City of Spokane Valley's comprehoasive plan goal'TG-13 states: "Fa�conragc l�d use and devolopmcnt �t�ble v��ith airport uses snd rogulatzd girspace'° Tho c�y's policy TP-13.2 is to disooarage incompatible lsnd uses and residential dansities adjacent to tbe airport The eity has not demanstrated in their anatysis thgt the pmposed changes are ncoded to fv�Il thair foreca..st housm.g demand or whether the options are consistent with tho c�hensiv�e plan palicies to protoct ti�e airport �orn in�romps��Ie �nd nses ��rese'dan� demsibes. ding requirements to miti.ga�e noise is not an affrxtive strabegy to discourage incampatible develop�ent. This � only sc�rves to react to a situatia� t�at con3d have bee� avaided wit� PmP� P�& ��Y� noise is but only ane of the four issnes that need to bo addressed whea deve�opmg comprehe�sive solutions bo discvw�agin8 incAmPatt�ble deve�opme�t. 'Fhc other factors incluae land use, air space obstructions and safety. WS:DOT Avisiion recommencis that the City of Spol+ane Vallgy revisit the met�odology used to estabiish the cuirent deveiapment r+egulations to assist in develo�ing a praposal t�sat more closely aligus with protection of the airport from incamp�ible laad uses and city needs.'We wonld aiso encourage the city to e�valuate their overall hous~ing objec#ives to deb�a�e if t�er+� are more stutable eress in the city to meet hausing demamd. As a part o�'t�is examination, we �et�d encourage tbe city t+a raview the airport's operatioaal charact�ristics aad needs to bettcr address its laaa use nesds cu�rentty ana in the f�bare. wsnoT s�ngiy recommends tha crty promote a mare campaii1�11� m�ed use e�ra�ent, �Y comPosed of co�mercisl, industrial, and rc�sid�ntial uses that limit the citi�eenries' ea.pos�re to noise, light, vibrgtian and fumes that are associated with aornasl airport opsrations an.d indush�ial activiiies. Unti� the stsff campigtes its , an$tysis WSDOT Avistion recommends adoptivn vf op�on 1, no chsage to e�reat �sida�ial dansity. T�ank you agai.n for the opporh�nity to commont Pleas� do not hesitxte to contact mo s# 360.b51.6312 or timmerc(c�wsdot.wa.gov if you have any questions, or if I can be of assistance. Sinc�rely, Certer Tirn.morionan � Aviation Planner WSDOT Aviation CC: Karva Kenc�all Ryan Sheehan � Ne�1 Sealock John Tov��nsley - John Si'bold 7ohn Sl�bangl� Dee Caputo 2 i � � � I � r r Spokane Valley Planning Commission Draft Minutes Council Chambers — City Hall, 11707 E. Sprague Ave. December 11, 2008 I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Robertson called the meetlng to order at 6:01 pm. II. PLEDGE OF AL.L.EGIANCE Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of alleglanoe , III. ROLL CALL : �' � I All Commissioners were present. � �,`., �,. Staff attending the meeting: Greg McCormick, � Planning Manager; Lori Bariow, � /�ssoclate Planner; Karen Kendall, Assistant Planner, .Carrle Acosta, Deputy City Clerk. ', IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA - It was moved by Commisstoner Kogle, secorided and unanimousiy agreed to accept the December ii, 2008 agenda as presented. � _ V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ��`'�; There were no minutes to approve. �' ,= _ -,.,. � ,: VI. PUBLIC COMMENT �' ��°'; :r � � ,. Mayor Munson thanked Commissioners Beaulac and ; -Kogle for their servloe on the Planning Commission on behalf of the City Council and presented them with certlflcates of appreciation��and pins wfth the city �{ogo. Mayor Munson then announced that Tom Towey and Joe h1ann were approved by the council and appointed to the Planning Commission. Councilmernb�er Gothmann also thanked them for thelr hard wa�k. ;. ,, VII. COMMISSION REPORTS , ,.,� ; No Commisslon reports VIII, ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS ;,, Planning Manager McCorr�ick said the next meeting wllf be ]anuary 8, 2009 and a shor� course session )anuary 22, 2009 with CTED. ' IX. COMMISSION BUSINE55 A. Old Business – Continued Public Hearing, Tftle 19, 19.110.030, Airport ' Hazard Overlay Chalr Robertson opened the Public Hearing at 6:13 p.m. Assoclate Planner � Kendall explained the reason for the condnuation af the public hearing for the ' Alrport Ove�iay Zone was to allow dme for the airport groups to review and meet with city staff to provide comment. She sa(d staff met with Spokane Irrterna�onai Airport and made some changes based on thelr recommendatlons. She said staff � has received one additionai public comment from Washington State Department of Aviatlon and she will distribute it to the commissioners. � Ms. Kendall said the area being discussed is residentlal zoning district w(thin zone 6 of the overlay zone. She said Optlon 1 is no change to the current density limitations. Option 2 allows density of current zone d�stricts within zone 6. Option ; 12/li/2008 Planning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 7 � f i 3 limits the zoning in zone 6 to the density limitations of current zone 2. She said this would not be a re-zone of all the parcels, but would be an overiay of density , restrictions in R2 which (s a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Option 4 ; would aliow density of zone 6 but development must comply with one of three ( following criteria: a.) The site has water or sewer stubs Installed; b.) Contiguous i parcels wfth a minimum lot size less than or equal to the underiying zone; or c.) ' More than one residence located on the property. She said staff also wants to � have language on the face of mylars for fina) plats and subdiv�sions located � within zone 6 stating that sound proof ineasures wiil be taken and a note that the lot ts located withln the alrport hazard overlay zone and it is subject to increased nolse levels. Opdon 5 is to split zone 6 on the north and south side of Trent Ms. Kendall said staff recammends Option 4 to allow density limitations in . the underlying zone but allow deveiopment that corriplies �with one of the three criteria and language be placed on the final mylars serving as notification of � increased no�se levels and soundproofing on all �new construction. Commissioner Beaulac asked �f the soundproofing would be �universal and how ft � would be enforced. Ms. Kendall said it would be up to the builder to notlfy peopte and it would be based upon the federal regulations for soundproo�ng. She sa(d there ls nothfng In our building code and at .this dme there is no interest in adding it to our code. Ms. Kendall added that in response to (iabflity questions, the city attomey said that the C'ity can adopt zoning regulations that are reasonably designed to ensure the public health, ,safety, and welfare.� To protect against later claims for noise we can require a title_notice that the property is within the afrport hazard overlay zone and that nolse, or other disturbances from traffic may occur, She said the city attorney concluded that In general�'he does not see any liability issues if the ordinance stays as Is. . ,:. . . ti Chair Robertson invited public corr�ment: Carter Timmerman; 3704 172'�--�: St, Arlington, WA — Representing the Washington -5tate Dept. of Transportatlon Avlation Divlsion (WSDOT AD). He said WSDOT-AD is concerned that the increases in allowabie residences (n this zone will affect the long-term operational viability of Fefts Ffeld and recommends the Plann(ng Commission , deny the request or table the proposal until a full ana�ysis of all the issues are addressed. He said WSDOT-AD has concluded that � options 2, 3,`and 4 are in contradictlon with the regulations of the GMA and that option 1 ls the only option that doesn't allow for the substantial encroachment on Felts Field. He said the rev(ew did not address the characteristics of the airport future. operations for impacts which (s a requirement of the GMA. He said noise is only one,o�`four fssues to be addressed and others lnclude: land use, a(rspace obstructions and safety. WSDOT-AD recommends option 1: no change to current residential dens�ty. Commissioner Sands asked if WSDOT-AD would be avallable to help staff if they recommend further analysis. Mr. Timmerman said he works for WSDOT-AD and looks forward to working wfth them In the future. Commissioner Eggelsfion asked how long an anafysis would take. Mr. Timmerman said he has no answer to that question and that it depends on the city's resource.s. Edfe Strekher. 5813 E. 4�' Ave — Ms. Strekher is the Legislative Affalrs Coordinator for the Spokane Homebuilders Assoc(ation which supports the effort to increase residential density in thls area. She said they are (n support of option 2 that allows for the greatest development. She sa[d she belleves home buyers 12/11/2008 Planning Commisslon Minutes Page 2 of 7 � 1 understand the oonditions in that area of fncreased noise, fumes, and iight when they move there. �ight Hume, 9�01 N. M�. �ew Lane — Mr. Hume said he is In support of opdons 4 or 2 because zone 6 is a noise zone, not a oash zone so he doesnt think it is an issue of density; therefore because zone 6 ts zoned residential they should allow the new construction of the 388 units (ko fuil build-out). lk� King� 9300 E. S�rague Ave. — Mr. King said he is a pflot and does tralning at Fe1ts Field and is speaking on behaif of Lffe River Fellowshlp Church locabed on the corner of Park and Buckeye. He safd they think the overlay zone is too far reaching. He said the atr traffic pattern of planes does not go over this area. He safd the church is concerned with the non-conforming use and the potendal for the property to (ose (ts value or its usage. He sald v�ith regard to no(se, railroads cause more noise than the afrcraft at Felts Field; there Is no jet traffic, onty light and small aircraft. He said his major concern is wlthin the crash zone because there Is no air traffic there; the planes don't fly over that area and if they {ose control they stlll do not come in from that angle because it is not practical. He recommends further study as we do not have �all the facts. � ]� Baur. 2410 N, Cherry St. -��Ir. 8aur said �he is a pr(vate pilot and said he thinks the probiem will always be nolse and that the City wfll stlll pe sued even if they are not lfable. He said if housing density is increased it Is likely peopie will ', move In who don't {fke the noise and who will say they had no idea there was an airport ther�, despite the notfflca�on on the plat He supports op�on 1 and I �courages the City staff to work wfth WSDOT-AD. .: �ohn Townsley, 607 W. Mont4amerX Ave — He said 'he fs a pi(ot and flies out of Fefts Field frequentty and doesn't think there Is a��great deai of rlsk (n explor(ng the issues further. He sald the declsion the Planning Commtsslon makes could have long-term :.consequences 'so. they need to make good declsions. He urges caution . and deliberation and said �'there is no reason to rush to a determinatlon; witl�i`�the recession� right now there is no rush to build so we should take the time. He safd the biggest complaint ls no�se and the noise is louder in warmer weather because ft Is� harder for planes to ci(mb in warm temperatures and people are likely outside so they will hea� it and they will feel the vibratlons. � �� on Gordonf 7105 E. Euclid — Mr. Gordon said he is out of the flight path but has lived in two different omes in this nelghborhood. He sald he has called the FAA with concerns about p�lots fiying outs�de of the flight paths as they approach the � runway and tliey have not been addressed. He sa�d there Is also a dirt and gravel road in the area that doesn� meet EPA because ft should have been paved as indicated ori the airport's original plan. He said Felts Field is used for fl(ght tnstrucfion causing potentlal haiard, as well has home-buitt planes that are not oonstructed to strict standar�ds. He said the proposal for language on the plat servin9 as notiflcatlon to homeowners Is typically not large enough once it Is reduced in size for the title report so homeowners may not be aware of the notice. He sa(d overall he thinks the overlay zone is relatively large and the area is too big but it should be he{d to no growth to eliminabe hazards In the area. Raymond Gunnin4. 6z�5 N. Theirman — Mr. Gunning said he loves the planes at Felts Fleld but he doesn� want the airport to hinder development He fs a proponent of optlon 4 or opdon 2 wfith some revisions. He said the area is a nolsy neighborhood with the train, the mill, and the a(rport and the longer this dectslon takes, the more resources and money is going to be spent and wasted. 12/11/2008 Planning Commiss(on Minutes Page 3 of 7 r ;— Chalr Robertson invited further comments from staff; none offered. Public carrments were dased at 7.•OS p.m. Commiss(oner Carroll asked staff what the probability of an acddent occurring In zone 6 ts likely to be. Ms. Kendall said that information probably comes from the state aviatlon guidelines where the traf�ic zones and flight pattems were developed; she said she can follow up to provide that informatlon to the commission. It was movad by Commissioner Beaula� and s�+ronde�a; to propase adopdon of option 4 to the C�y Counocil. Mr. Beaulac said he is in favor of option 4 because there are Z000 other res�dents (n the oommunity that haven`t complained, ft Is a community that has been allowed to develop and � he doesn't th(nk new development will make much of a difference. Commtss(oner Kogle asked staff if Spokane International Airport (SIA) offered any inpu�. Ms. Kendall said she spoke with Ryan Sheehan, the manager of Feits Fleld through SIA, who said he was unab{e to attend tt�e meeting today but had no furtfier comments to share. She sald they had met with SIA previously, but they dld not ofFer an opinfon to staff. Commissioner Sharpe said he favors option 2 because thls area has been in existence for a long time and it is an area that has the potential for fill-in development. He also safd that the reason people buy houses near�an airport is i affordability; the cost of land Is less. CommIssioner Carroll said he thlnks they are recognizing growth that aiready exists and could be developed along wfith the afrport and option 4 recognfzes that co-development. Commfssioner Kogle safd she agrees, but is sensidve to the airports and doesn't want to jeopardi�e them. Commissioner Sands said she has seen afrports shut down and it has been due , to residendal in-fill. She said �Feits Field is a unique feature of this area and she wants it to thrive. She said �,originally she tho�ight the overfay zone was a forward-thinking plan to help save the airport. She �s (n favor of option 4 but would like the city to take dme and allow WSDOT-AD to bring more information to the �planning commisslon. Commissioner Eggleston said he is frustrated they � did not recefve more informatlon from WSDOT-AD and Felts Ffeid when they had been asked and had been gfven more tlme. He said he ls in favor of optlon 4 and he agrees we should give more' time to get more information. but he doesn't � want to wait forever. l/ote by show of hands: In favor. Commt�sloners Sharpe, Carro!/, and Beau/ac. OpPoseod.• Commiss/oners Kag/e, Sands, Egg/esinn, and Robertson.� Motion Faile�d. �` It was moveJ by Commissloner Sands, and second�d, thaf staf�` work w/th WSDOT-AD for a per/od of th�ee months (to conduct thefr ana(ysis and present tt at-�a future ,ineetlng). Chafr Robertson asked for clarificatlon of process and whether we � need to set a sped�c date for this item to come back before the commission. Planning Manager McCormick sald they can continue the hearing to a date : certaln �r they can close the hearing and re-advertise and re-open the hearing. Mr. McCormick sald they need direction as to what informadon the commisslon is seeking. Commissioner Sands (nvited Mr. �mmerman to comment as to the Informatlon he wouid help provide. He said he recommends they work wlth the airport on flight patterns, current and planned operatlons, and conductlng a risk assessment. He said he offers his services at no charge to the City. Gommissioner Sands recommended someone from the reai estate community join In the discussfon for a fair and balanced conversation. Commissioner Eggleston asked if this analysis can be comp(eted in three months. Mr. Timmerman said he can not guarantee anything. l/ote by acdamation: In Favor.• Corrrml.�slone�s Robertson, Carroll, Eggleston, Kagle, Sands, and Sharpe. Oppas�d.• Commissloner Beau/ac. Motlon pa.sse+o! 12/11/2008 Planning Comm(ssion Minutes Page 4 of 7 � ,- i Chalr Roberston cailed for a break at 7:23 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 7:30 p.m. B. New Business — Public Hearing, Tftle 20, Subdivisions I Associate Planner Lori Bar{ow explalned the purpose of the public hearing ls to ', discuss the proposed Tftle 20 updates and develop a reoommendatlon to councli to elther approve the updates as proposed, approve the updates with ; modificatlons, or to recommend o�undi not adopt the proposed updates. She ' introduced Henry Allen from Development Engineertng and Rich Waltrip of David ' Evans and Associates who provide comments and guidance for piat c�eview for Spokane Valley; both are abie to answer any technical questions from the commission. She reviewed for the commissbn that Title 20 was adopted in 2007 as patt of the overall regulatlons adopted and since that time stat� has been reviewing all of the regulations for lnconsistencies, errors, and things that don't work and need to be changed. She said that in the tirne sinoe she released the , public review document for comments, she has met� with .the legal department and the City Atbomey recommended four m(no1� changes �that will involve some , reformatting to the document but the content of the docurnent is not slgniflcantty changed. She said Tide 20 includes all the regulatioris for, review oF subdfvisions, short plats, binding site pians, alte� vacatlons, and boundary line adjustments. She said the majority of ttie changes are in fchapter 20.20, 20.30, 20.40. 20.20 — General Provisions: The Cfty Attorney has proposed that fn the Exemptions sectlon the � exemptions be categor(Zed Into two categories; a.) provisions are exempt, Title' 20 does �not apply; and b.) the following actions are exempt, the exemptlon applicatlon provided and a drawing consistent wfth 20.20.20 Is provided to the city. Thts allows staff to review the drawing to ensure it Ls not In ,violation with the code requirements. In addition, she sald Item b5 has been added; however, it was in the previous code but did not get c�rried forward in the 2007 adoption. . � 20.20 — Monumentadon: She said allows for property comers to be marked i or referenced, right-of-way centerlines and street Intersection monumentatlon as established by street standards. Another change is that side lot Ilnes would be allowed ; to be wfthfn 20 degrees perpendicular to the right-of-way. , ,. ' Comer lot I(nes at street intersec[ion of two public streets the property line will , - be located at a minlmum of two feet behtnd the back of a curb. At intersections � of arterials, a minimum of fifteen feet ftom behind the pedesMan landing wil) be rIght-of-way or border easement to provide for trafflc utilities. Mr. Allen explalned that a.typical street section has a border easement (ocated at the back of the , sidewalk so� thaC widening of flfteen foot border easement comes in tangent with border easement called out (n the street standards. If tfiere is Hght-of-way that extends behind the sidewalk, then the fifteen feet would come in tangent to the right-of-way. To get the arc, he said they use a CAD program to create a drde � and the arc ls a part of that circle, and fifteen feet is the third-polnt constant. Ms. Barlow contlnued to the proposed change that for tracts that are being divided into lots greater than one acre, the Comrnunity Development Director has the discretion ta require a plan that will show how that land be further developed and it take lnto considerafion the Master P(an. The City Attomey recommended adding that ff a redevelopment plan is required, It should also take fnto consideration the areas Identifled in the future acquis�lon area and it would identlfy areas we m(ght requlre streets or public facili�es. � � 12/11/2008 Pianning Commissian Minutes Page 5 of 7 i She sa(d an additJonal proposed change Is that aileys be included as (mprovements that are required to be constructed prior to fiiing a finai plat, and existing and proposed easements be requlred on all drawings, and they have crzated a section establishing provisions that allow for attached single faml[y ' development to be subdivided. + Chapter 20.30: Majority of changes are oontained wfthfn the contents of the � appiication. A significant change (s that they would require pre-aps would be requlred for short plats and binding site plans, where previousfy there was no charge the City is now in the process of developing a charge. They are proposing a plat certiflcate be required at the preliminary plat stage, that the assessors map and tide informatlon be allowed to be dated within 60 days of the applicat�on, the vicinity map scale and deta(l�, show required border easements on the pre(iminary plat, topographlcal information can be shown at 5 foot maximum contour intervals or two feet (ntervals�and that the land surveyor can select a source at their discretlon. They have proposed to eliminate the requirement of electronic flles being submitted at the preliminary plat stage as well as e�iminate tfie requirement for high �accuracy reference network boundary point. Chapter 20.40: Proposing that at the time the myfar Is submitted, the appllcant provide the City with an electronic file,` that �all dlmenslons be'�shown on the drawing, and that the partiai dimensioris have to equal the overall dimensions i shown, the water purveyor and fire department signatures be eliminated. Language for the bond �in lieu of construction she said the City Attorney � recommend they divide the types of improvements�that can be bonded for into two categories: street improvements and non-street Improvements. He has suggested they take out the language� in the criteria for street improvements that would dictate hoav to go about bonding from the subdivfsion section and defer to the street design standards. � , 7 , Chapter 20.50: No significant cha'r�ges proposed but they darified the process to follow. �` , � � ` ', Chapter 20.60: Added binding �fte plan as a'fype II process and (dentifled a process, that allows a binding site plan to use a record of survey to establish lots �, within the recorded binding site plan with speciflc criteria. Chapter 20.70: No change proposed. � Chapter 20.80:;No signiftcant changes proposed, Added additional language and the City Attorney suggested they add to item G Such alteratlon shall not result In ' a building setback violatlon or site coverage to less than prescribed by the zoning regulations or areas as required by future acquisition areas, Ms. Barlow said staff recommends the updates be approved with the items noted by the City Attorney. Chafr Robertson opened the pubilc hearing at 7:55 p.m. Am(e Woodard, 2511 S. Best Road — Mr. Woodard said he is concerned w(th in , Chapter 20.30, number 3 regard(ng condos and manufactured home parks there ' w(!I be a dramatic increase to the cost if there is a binding site plan requirement. In the exemptions, another concern is the recording of the binding sfte plan and how ft affects the affordabflity of housing. He asked the commiss(oners to take that Into consideratfon when making thelr final dec(sion. , 12/11/2008 Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 7 Mike Philff�, 949 N. Amonne — Mr. Phillips asked that they cons(der eliminating the notice requlred for a pre�fminary plat because he doesn't think ft ls necessary to norify neighbors when subm(tting an appllcatlon and then an additional notice when it goes to hearing for comment, adds approximately an add(donal $350. He also sald that he doesn't think they should requfre there be a radius on every lot , on a plat when there fs a requlrement to show tfie arc length because it is redundant. Rfch Waltrip from David Evans and Assaclates confirmed the radlus informatlon is redundant Ms. Barlow sald that whI(e it may be redundant but it Is useful informatlon. It �S not a change and is a oontlnuation of the code requlrement. �ohn Gordon. 7105 E, Euclid — He asked tf boundary line adjustrnents will stlll requfre a sunrey. Ms. Bariow sald they do. He said other municipalitles don't requfre ft and the price in Spokane Valley can cost`up to $3,600. Mr. McCormidc said It is required In Spokane Valley because past experience revealed the property lines may be off, buildings are not located where they often think they are, and we need to make sure the boundary line adjustment does not create a non-conforming situation. ; � Chafr Rober�on c��+d the publ/c hearing at 8:30 p.m. �� Mr. McCormick sald the In regard bo notice of ,appiicatlon, it is required by state � law and we do not have any optlon other than to notlfy the public of the application. '.� It was moverd by Commtsstoner Kagl� and second� tb r�avmmend to C�ty � Councl/ the Title 20 Subdivlslon as !s. Mr. McCormick asked for clarification if ! that inciuded the changes� .from the City Attorney as presented th(s evening. Commissioner Kogle amended .the motlon to Re�rommend to the C/ty Counci/ the Title 20 Subdrvlsion changes as propose�d. Vote by acclamation: In Favor: Unan(mous. Opposed: None. Motion passed. C. Electlon of 2009 Offlcers . , ,� Commissioner Beaulac nominated � Ian Robet�on to Chair, seconded and unanimously :passed. Chair Robeitson naminated John Carroll to V(ce Chair, seconded and unanirnously passed. X.� . GOOD OF THE ORDER ;_ � Chair Robertson thanked �ommissioner's Kogle and Beauiac for their service to the Commission, as weU �as staff. He also asked that his thanks be extended to Mr. Kuhta for all his hard work. � XI. ADJOURNMEN�' �� There being �►o other business the meeting was adjourned at 8:40 pm SUBMITTED: APPROVED: � Carrie Acosta, Deputy City C1erk Ian Robertson, Chairperson I 12/il/2048 Plann(ng Commission Mlnukes Page 7 of 7 1 � , � i I Page 1 of 1 Karen Kendall From: Ryan Sheehan [rsheehan�spokaneajrports.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 11:14 AM To: Karen KendaN Subject: Acddent data for Fefts Field Attachments: Accident report 11-29-2003.pdf , Karen, , Here is what I found: oniy one accident was listed as occurring at or in the vicinity of Felts Field by the NTSB. The database search I ran did not include °incldent° data. Inddents are usually minor accurrences that do not involve high-value property damage, injuries or fataiities. So I guess you were right about there onfy being one accident. In fact i ran the query on the NTSB website back 40 years and this was the only °accidenY' on record with the NTSB lis�ng Felts Fieid as the nearest airpo�. Let me know ff you need anything eise, and keep me posted on t�e City Council actions. � Thank you, ; Ryan Sheehan Airport Opera�ons Manager Spokane Intemationai Airport 9000 W. Airport Drive, Suite 204 Spokane, WA 99224 (509) 455-6418 Office (509) 998-7261 Cell i � 3/2612009 1 L � I I I I � i -- r— CITY OF p O �� Community Development Planning Division e� v 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 10b ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 �� 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall�spokanevalley.org February• 17, 2009 SU�CT: Notif�ication of change in proccss for code amendment to the Airport Hezard Overlay , (CTA-04-08). � Dear Parties of Record: As you may recall the Planning Commission closed the continued public hearing on December 11, 2008 with a motion to create an advisory committee snd retwn in 3 months to re-opcn the public hearing for review and recommendation. City Council was presented the Planning Commission's motion and direcbed staffto carry the proposed code amendment forward for review and decision. I You have expressed interest or have received prior notice regardi.ng the proposed code amend.ment to Zone 6 of the Airport Hazard Overlay and I am notifying you of the scheduled meeting dates w�ith the City Council. All City Council meetings are open to the public. The study session is informstional only and no public commcnt is takea It is custvmary for the City Council to ask for pubiic comments pertaining to an item before a motion is made at the 1� and 2 readings. The meeting dat�s are as follows The dates and�or locations may change and notification is not requir�ed to be sent as it is not a public hearing. You may go to the City's web page (www.�kanevallev.org) and click on the city counci] agenda link for updates. 1. Study Session = March 3, 2009 at City Hall (11707 Past Sprague A��enue, Ste 101; , Spokane Valley►, WA) 2. 1" Reading = April 14, 2009 at CeaterPlace (2426 N Discovery Place, Spokane Valley, WA) 3. 2° Reading and Decision = April 28, 2009 at City Hall (11707 East Sprague Avenue, Ste 101; Spokane Valley, WA) You may contact me at (509) 688-0172 or kkendall�soo evallav.ore if you have any questions or require additional information. Since ely, � � E. ALL Assistant Plaaner City of Spokane Valley Department of Community Development I Parties of Record CTA-04-08 N�� Address emall JeN Hamilton 3305 S. H(gh Drive, Spokane, WA 99203 ithamilton(d�comcast.net Gary 8 Caroyfyn White 10405 E Fe�rei Drive, Spokane Valley, WA 9920G g�.whitelQearthtink.net Bill 8� Eteanor Faitfi 7719 E Kleman Rd, Spokane Valley, WA 99212 Larry Totsln 8810 E Red Oak, Spokene, WA 99217 g�� M�� 4015 S Sundertand Drive, Spokane Valley� WA 99206 blakeCd�apokaneendu.com Maic:om Robertson 2519 N Dicl� Spokane Valley, WA 99212 James Baur 2410 N Cherry St, Apt 208, Spokane Vapey, WA 99216 Dwfght Hume 9101 N Mt View Lane, Spokane, WA 99218 a� g�� 8205 E Marietta, Spokane Valby, WA 99212 � �� 857 E Lyons, Spolcane, WA 99208 Sara Orrange 1924 N Ash, Spokane, WA 99205 sara a[�s�okanereeltor.com Jeft & Pam Mclntyre 3816 N Park, Spokane VaUey, WA 99212 John 8 Kay S�pe 2820 N Center Rd� Spakane Valiey, WA 99212 [kstlae(u�earthiink.nat John Townsley 607 W Montgamery Ave, Spdcane, WA 99205 hiqhflight(a�Q.com Gary Schwisow, Store Mgr, WaOcet's Fumiture 15 E Boone, Spolcane, WA 99202 Mike King, Stonemark Real Estate Co 9300 E Sprague, Sulte 1Q0� Spnicene VaUey, WA 99206 mkinq _stonemarkr�alestate.com Edle Streict�er, Spokane Homebubders AssodaUon 5813 E 4th Ave, Spokane Valley, WA 99212 estreicherC�shba.�om Neal Sea[ock� Spokene Intemadonal Airport 9000 W Airport Dr., #20�, Spokane, WA 99224 nsealockC�Dsuokaneairoorts.net Ryan Sheehan, Spokane Intematbnal Airports 9000 West Airport Drive, Suite 204; Spokane, WA 99224 rsheehanCc�spokaneairports.nei Catter T'unmerman, WSOOT Aviation Divislon PO B�c 3367. Arlington, WA 88223 tlmmerc�'d2wsdot.wa.qov Mike Klein, Orchard Avenue Irrigation District 917 S Bowdlsh, Spokane, WA 99206 Ctty of LJberty Lake, Communtry Development CKy of Spokane, Ptanning Servicea Town of Miltwood Spokana County, Building and Planning Spokane County, Division of Utili�es - Infonnabon Services; Jim Red Spokane County Flre District No. 1 Spokane Transtt Autho�ity (STA) Spokarie Regbnal Transpo�lation Council Washington State Department of Ecology (Olympla) Washington StHte Department of Ecotogy (Spokanej Washingion State Boundary Review Board ` Washington Stete Department of Transpo�tadon — Aviation Division Felts Fleld Alrpon Orchard Avanue Irrigatlon Dlstrict No. 6 Spokane County Water Diatrici No. 3— System No. 1 City of Spokane Water Service Holiday Tra�ler Cou�t West Valley School Dlstrid No. 363 Comcast — Wdt BameslBryen Rict�ardson SEFNCO Communications (Consuttant to Comcast) — Jarod Duncan Avista — Claude Ka[er Qwest — Don Hartzog � i �� /�� )�'� .� .1�� .� � -/� C�9 �_ t ' I I I i 1 I � l.l 1 l� l/1' o e Community Development Ptanning Division e� Y 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 10b ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall�spokanevaltey.org March 6, 2009 SLr�.JEC�': Revision to G`ity Council meeting dates regarding the code amendment to the Airport Hazard Overlay (CTA-04-08). Dear Parties of Record: The City Council conducted a study sess.ion on March 3, 2009 and revised the meeting dates on the proposed code amendment to the Airport Hazard Overlay. You have expressed interest or bave received prior notice regarding the pmposed code amendment to Zone 6 of the Airport Hazard Overlay and I am notifying you of the revised meeting dates with the City Council as a courtesy. The revised meeting dates are as follows. T`he dates and/or locarions may change and notification is not required to be sent as it is not a public hearing. You may go to the City's web page (www.s�okanevalley.or�) and click oa the city council agenda Iink for updates. 1. 1`` Reading = March 24, 2009; 6:OQpm at City Hall (11707 Fast Sprague Aveaue, Ste 101; Spokane Valley, WA) � 2. 2n'� Reading and Decision = April 7, 2009; 6:OOpm at City Hall (11707 East Sprague Avenue, Ste 101; Spokana Valley, WA) You may contact me at (SQ9) 688-0172 or kkendall�asvokanevalley.org if 3�ou have any questions or require additional information. Sinc ly, 1 �"� N E. KENDALL i Assistant Planner Cifiy of Spokane Valley Department of Cominunity Development CC: All parties of record Partjea of Record CTA-04-OS Name Add�ss emall Jeff Hamilton 3305 S. High Drive, Spokane, WA 99203 jthemliton�comcastnet Gary 8 Caroyt�m Whtbe 10406 E Femet Drive, Spokar►e VaUey, WA 99208 gcwhitel(c�Qarthlink.net Bill b Eleanor Faith 7719 E Kfeman Rd, Spokane Val{ey, WA 99212 Larry Totsin 8610 E Red 081c, Spokane, WA 99217 Blake McfGnley 4015 S Sunde�tand Drive, Spokane Valley. WA 99206 blaket�spokaneendu.com Maicom Robertson 2519 N Dfd� Spokarte Vafley, WA 99212 James Beur 241 a N Cheny St, Apt 208, Spolcane Velley, WA 98218 Dwight Hume 9101 N Mt Vlew Lane, Spokane, WA 99218 Greg Bvwman 8205 E Marietra, Spokane Valley, WA 99212 Jesse WNson 857 E Lyorts, Spolcene, WA 99208 Sara Orrange 1924 N Ash, Spokane, WA 99205 sara�snokener��ltor.com Jeff 8 Pam Mclntyre 3818 N Paric, Spokane Vatley, WA 99212 John 8� Kay S�pe 2820 N Center Rd, Spokane Valley, WA 99212 jkstine(l�eartfiilnk,net � John Tawnsiey 607 W Monfgomery Ave, Spokane, WA 99205 hlghflioh a.com Gary Schwlsow, Store Mgr, Walkers Fumiture 15 E Boone, Spokane, WA 99202 Mike tQng, Sb�nemark Real Estate Co 9300 E S'prague� Suite 100, Spokane Velley� WA 99208 mkt�g�atonem rkreaiestate.com Edie 5trelc��er, Spokane Homebufiders Assoc�atlon 5813 E 4th Ave, Spokane VaAey, WA 99212 estreicher�shba.com Neal Sealock, Spokane IntemaHona! Airport 9000 W Ahport Dt.. #204, Spokane� WA A9224 na@�Jodc(d1s��canealrvort�.net Ryan Sheehan, Spokane IrttsmaBonal Airports 9a00 West Afrpoct Orive, 5uibe 204; Spokane, WA 99224 tsheehant�sao4caneaitnorts.net Carter Timmerman, WSDOT Avlation Dfvisbn P� Box 3367, Arifigtan, WA 98223 timmerc _wsdotwa.g�v_ Mike Kle�, Orchard Avenue IrrigaBon O�Strict 917 S Bowdtsh, Spokene, WA 9920G City of Liberty Lake. Community Devebpment Cit�+ of Spokane, Planning Servioes Tovm of Mqlwood Spokane County. Building and Planntng Spokane County, Ofvision of Utlfftles - InfoRnadon Services; Jim Red Spokane County Flre Dlstrlct Na 1 Spokane Transit Authorfity (STA) Spokane Reglonal Transportation Council Washington Stste Departrnent of Ecology (Otympla) Washingb� Stebe Department of Eoolagy (Spokane} Washinyton State Baundary Review Board � Washington Stabe Department of Transportatbn —Avta�on Divfsion Orcttard Avenue Irrlgatlon Dtstrict No. 8 Spokane County Water District No. 3— System No. 1 City of Spokane Water Service Haliday�Trailet CouK , West Valley School Distrid No. 363 Comcast — Rich BameslBryan Rlchardson � SEFNCO Cornmunicatjons (Consultant to Comcast) — Steven Veede� Avista — Claude Kaler Qwest — Don Hartrog i � � � � � I i - - RECEIVED ' Spokane lnternafional Airport MAR 1 � 2009 BUSiNFSi PAR[ AND PELTS EI&LD I i � 5 �,�� u4= 2 a SPOKANE VALLEY (509} 455-5455 DEPARTMEN7 OF spokaneatrports.net COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mayor Rich Munson City of Spokane Valiey 11707 E. Sprague Ave Spokane Valley, WA 99206 16 March 2009 Subject: Airport Input to Compatible Land Use Decision Dear Mayor Munson and City Council Members� �� We appreciate your continued efforts to address compatible land uses around Felts Field. The airport will be represented at the additional meetings regarding this issue. I regret that the most recent change in dates will not permit me to attend. Please accept this letter and the attached memorandum regarding compatible land use for your consideration prior to taking action. I was surprised to discover I that your "study session" would or could not accommodate accurate technical advice It IS my opinion you were not served well by the anecdotal information shared during that session. j We too advocate the establishment of a Zone, or "Airpo�t Infiuence Area", whose j boundaries and criteria incorporate all of the Airport approaches, tra�c patterns and noise buffer areas and in which residential uses are strictly prohibited. Until such a zone can be developed, we support any action that prohibits consideration of residential uses within these buffer areas. With the 1996 legislation (RCW 36.70.547, RCW 36.70A.510) requiring all cities and counties to adopt comprehensive plan goals, policies and regulations to discourage development of incompatible land uses adjacent to public use � airports, we are collectively responsible to ensure the future of these critical I aviation assets. � i ' i _ I Our understanding is that the Growth Management Act identifies airports as essential public facilities. We, along with Spokane County and C�ty of Spokane, have contractually agreed in FAA grant assurance #2�, to prevent the establishment or creation of future Airpo�t hazards and in grant assurance #21 to take appropriate action, to the extent reasonable, to restrict the use of land adjacent to or in the immediate vicinity of the Airport to activities and purposes compatible with normal Airport operations. The permitting of residential uses, around the airport or within any APZ or 65 Ldn noise contour are clearfy incompatible with present and future Airport operations. The ramifications of allowing continued residential expansion in this area include a direct impact on the current and future operations at Felts Field. The Airport Board and Airport management assume the responsibility to advise Spokane County, the City of Spokane, and in this case, the City of Spokane Valley regarding issues which have a definitive impact on current or future operations. We most respectfully request your favorable consideration of the ' information provided and stand prepared to assist in any manner possible. � Thank you for the opportunity to comment. If we can be of any assistance in this regard, do not hesitate to call. Please contact me at 509-455-6419 rf I may be of any assistance. Sincerely, Neal Sealock Airport Director Cc: City Council Members, City of Spokane Valley Mr. Mike Ormsby, General Counsel, Spokane Airport Board � Mr. John Sibold, WSDOT Aviation Mr. Ryan Sheehan, �perations Manager, Spokane Airports Ms. Karen E. Kendall, Assistant Planner City of Spokane Valley i � �— �-- Memorandum for: Mayor and City Council City of Spokane Valley Subject: Compatible Land Use Around Fefts Field I Ensuring that Spokane's Fe(ts Field Airport is regionally compet�tive and delivers the best airport experience possibie, drives our organization and our tenant partners every day. Airports are rmportant economic generators for their communities and regions. They provide significant economic impacts, both direct and indirect, for the cities and counties in which they are located and neighboring communities, as well. Aviation industries generate jobs for the respective community, both on and off airport sites, as well as provide products and services for sale. The indirect economic benefits (visitor spending) of airports are not as obvious, but are often equal or greater than direct impacts. General Aviatlon airports located in close proximlty to business travelers' final destinations provide added value and flexjbility to their schedules in today's highly competitive global market place. Recognizing this benefrt, many national and intemational corporations recognize the convenience of a ge�eral aviation airport as a major factor in determining where to locate their executive operations or manufacturing facilities. These decisions greatly benefit a community as they translate into jobs, tax revenues and far reaching positive impacts into the local business comrnunity. The services and benefits of general aviation go well beyond economic development alone. Felts Field supports various law enforcement activities (Spokane � County Sheriff, Customs & Border Patrol), provides access for critical emergency services (INHSIMed Star), search and rescue operations, disaster relief efforts, educational and training services (SCC, Moody, Spokane Turbine). A contract control tower supported by Federal assistance maintains safety and numerous jobs. Equally beneficial, Felts serves as a destination for regional aviation enthusiasts and those who enjoy recreational flyjng, including the largest collection of flyable Stearmen in the world ; and the world's only ffying Boeing 40 owned by Addison Pemberton. In total, more than Despite their obvious benefits, airports are under increasing pressure to modify operations, relocate or even close due to perceived noise and safety related impacts. This situation is often caused by development pressures placed on local decision makers, faced with the need to provide new schools, additional housing and increased business opportunities. The Federal government, the State of Washington and local governments all have substantial public investments in Felts and the entire state airport system. Unfortunatefy, available funding for replacing or relocating existing airports is becoming increasingly scarce, while the cost of capital and maintenance i projects is steadily growing. Thus, it is vital to the future of our state that we take the appropriate steps to preserve and protect our existing airport system from the encroachment of incompatible land-uses. � I . �' i � To protect our airports from undesirable land-uses, local governments, devetopers and airport operators need to cooperate and communicate. Local govemments may help by planning and developing compatible land uses around regional airports. Commercial, industrial and agricultural uses, to name a few, tend to be more compatible and less sensitive to airport activity than residential uses. Numerous options can be used by localities and airports to enhance the � compatibility between the airport and the community. To address the problem, the airport and Ioca(ity need to cooperatively work together to determine the appropriate level of land use compatibility planning required to protect the airport from encroachment and provide the commUnity the blueprint to grow so to meet the increasing development . pressures of urban and suburban growth. How Can Communities Protect Airports All communities face development pressures, therefore it is important that compatible land use planning around airports receive special consideration in several areas. These include areas where the height of objects or structures must be restricted, areas with the greatest potential for aircraft accidents, areas where airport-related noise should be mitigated, and areas of regular or frequent overflight (such as the areas under airport approaches and traffic patterns). Protecting Airspace Around Airports One of the greatest threats to pilot safety is intrusion of an airport's airspace by the erection of structures that penetrate through imaginary surfaces that encircfe the airport and are identified to primarily protect the approach and departure phase of f(ight. Other areas of overflight would be encircling the airport as defined by the local traffic pattern. These would also include areas of actual or potential fliqht paths identified bv instrument approach and missed approach procedures. It is the responsibilitv of federal and state aqencies with the cooperation and primary responsibility of Iocal aimort operators to protect aimort airspace. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has prescribed standards for the height of objects near airports in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 14, Part 77, "Objects Affecfing Navigable Airspace." This regulation defines a system of irnaginary sur#aces around an airport, through which no fixed object or structure should penetrate. The imaginary surfaces are designed to protect the critical airspace around an airport and allow for the safe operation of aircraft to and from the airport (Figure 1). Airport operators and local governments are encouraged to work closely with the Department and the FAA to protect the single most valuable commodity to an airport- that is: Airspace. , ' �.. • ,. ��,�v - .�` i�.r � ��l .<<- �.1� :l' ' �. ' � 1 ' y' . �.• :: ;f 0 � �I ,� _ 1 '� � . - ,��1� - �1.- •.S.;i: .'a _ . j ,•• ��. �i �f� _ •l . '�',� •�;.'��.,' •�', 'i �,' , ,' ;''� �/', � ��,� � � , �f � �.1. :�- �' r � '�•'• 11 1 . I• ,'� L .. . e I � . � :�, - ,4, ..� . �,J� ,.. -.� � . �� _. ,'� ' . �� . 1,' r t �j .�� ' '��. s�Jl ,� �.. ,1 I '� y '},�� '�.1 �I , . . . �.� . .. • � - . . . . . . , . . �i ^ • .�� , L � . r . .. � �� i . � . �- ' ' � - �. �,1 � i (. � � , ■ � ' . i :5 , � � �. ■ 1 , i - . . , , . . . i" , _ r � i w ,� .' l� � ' 1 � !. r, . .' • . ' t . . � � � - - . - . .. . .'� , . .. 1 +♦�.. ��S��it1 1�.�. � . . . � � .. �� `I '+'Sr70 . r � f+'�� ,��1 ��1 .�,. / .' . . .. . � . ��, . 1 : . , . . . . . . . . . . . . y��• ± �.S .� �i .F.� �• . , �.};' �� Til�;•..!: •�' .'� '.`� �.i1� • � � �. � . � , ' � . - '�, ��. '.��[�. 1 U :t . '�;2a�yT�`�� • .�'-} • �`r �f.. � � ��.*'� t: r -i.�}�.�JT't�ti��'�'`��'':��;i.�l� �� 'j'�l' L� �' ^ii�� . �' 'r•�\2.:'Ji•� � �ii�4� � rA �'J,� 1 '\<-5��. .� � J�1t'� ��l - . - . ►, y� ��1'�.i :! �` 1 . 4 ''ar 4�'3�� !. LC ;1� I�„ , �f�•��. , �.. � �• y�b /� L'�.��..'` ��1' ; :� Y t 7 � '�' � 1 i�'1 � •t � )' /n:T�' . ��.1 Y J..�C'f }.,, i.tt .fi .I.a�, t" _ , �. ♦ ' cc. � S; ,•r_ .,",� 1' ,�'. 1ti�� ,M . �., ? 1� 4� � 1�ti• 'L 1 r ...r :\•...V r �s�- � .il,��_• � r,� r i _'' , a"1 � :)�, i �.`�- ..� . Lt � . .l. - � '`� r, � �� : 1� �/ �-, . . . � 1 •1 :s y �x. � • - :ti�".. .1�'.' ,� '� � �.. � ' .i_ + •.'1 �. a.•' ,�-�+�' ..r+"' � �� .C� ,C- �:i" ....._ .� � �: .S: �wr �� . �, i:-C- r i� � � :�.. �)�i.'�y:��..• "}' �.1.' •�, ,�. _� IFs' :�... �. ! =C: y{ �.i� 1 r-S.•ti� .'t'';:1'� C? �"' •�".• '}` �' � ��..*i� .� �'f' �t� :'^�. .�:` ,t' .��.`� � • � I ..��1�'_� `�., . .. .. �� •� 1�� 'M' ...'J• . 1 . . . w� ..f r� � - . , �. � � L..�=.`;�. ... '�� 1+e.� .I•:'. ..,�!'�1' gt1� . �- ��':� t��t � � 1 '..�:. .r� �.` :. _ ..�••.:'�. � �.;,�.' •• � �.j '� 1• '.1 } .� t 't. y �� • i• 1 •��„ _ .�. �� i_ ~.� i� .t . . .�.' ,Y .,' "!',� }'' • � � r� � . � ,l�i_1,.� � ].. �� ♦ •.T .:i�. . _ ` TE'��RE� �UIRE�VI�I��'yS�: ��ti � '�� -. � . STA C� _ - - � . _ , . _ �, ��- ._ . � ` . -�� Air orts are Essen�tiai Pu�blic Facilities � _ �� ' ' : . _ . , p . . .,, . � � - _ -� � ��_, _ - �� ,. ��R��yti36.�70A.200): � - � � ;� �, � ; , • `r _. 1. - .' ' .- '= � - � .; .. � ' .. ' ":' :multi=modal ' `� �� _ ■ �Airport�s ��are �.part of the ;� ._ 4 . 1 , _ -' =. - - -:. - - i � J -- i --_ - �, - � � transportat�or�t sy�tem ; �- _ . - � �� , - .. .� ,. ._... : . .. . ; . _: . . . . . . . _ . ., . ._ .. . . . �. . . n _� � ��R�CW 36 �.1.,0��o"V,fA: � ��__ - f� l. l 'a `; S �` �� i �� Z ,, � � -= r L : '� � - •f f4` ` 7� a � � ,_ . � r . � � 11 -� L� � _�t� r �. T 1� _ � � � L � � � . S � � � '= ��; �- i �' � � r 1� �it. i� r il _r' �' _ � - .}�.. : ... � j= �- � � h rinl" T '1 l - .�� .. � _� , 1 - _ '� ' � ., �' ti :� ' 4,. . '� L� - � . . � . . �� " �. �.. • � � ■ �Towns�, � citiesMa�d,i:counties must discourage �;: , . �_ �. � , � . : . , _ � _ - . . , - � � .? . . . ,1 . , ,� � � '� ' � inco � atibie ,land �uses�� ,� � � r �� ,:: �, - , � �� - -��. _ ,��ti'� -�1�! '�r"�'t .�.� l � '�� u. .,�,� i t. �• l ,y...},1qC - „��J- ,� i'I;�:ti �- • t � � � � � � /'�C '5 �j :sL r .s. y - F. � . , -:fi. �!, .ti • ',,},�,'� � � , s;�� . r-I. 4- �,�' { '�,� � � C _ �i 1' 1 ;. �' }. i:: ti r f:. •�-•1�:t., 1 f.� ��'~ z. 1�: ry � .i' R � ' /!'� :T'�• � .,� 1 . � Y � I. J'' �i.' t+ �.t�,L �v � 'r•'•� � 4 �. �.. �(- .7� .1 t f,� _ •� ��; � .O�'f�V. �� '�/�'� 'I��1F' '� � �� n . i f ' f .�,� fp ( C 4, � �� A�`63��170 �5;6 . � � :,�_ ..-��, .� .,. ,.. , }. .. �� •MnI.� �r�� ,1 �. �� , . 47 ,36.7 �i4.510 3v . : ., ,. ��,-, ;.,� „ .su�,<;,. .,t ..., :,:, -�_t_y. }� .,.� ,�� .,..� ,,; �;,:., , RC �W .36. 74 5 q ,. Q ,,: , : , .. . ..�� z - . ,. .�: , �,: , a � � �;� �; �-,, , , _ . , : . �: . -,. , ..;,:. = � . � at'� .�' ;��• �t. - � �' /� .r� -:r'_ . ;'.:. , .,� .11 .f ',i'. ,�;T;,°7i „;,. h.. ,� . .. �ti�. `V�'i�`,✓, i. ..1', .,.1::;, �.. - t �.��r i, , 1„ ��,'. .. i I �� I� ��Ii �� .ti:. li�� l:.r' '�i. .i�� .r. 1�_ • l �1 � ..� '.T., i �i.�� .f:�� 1 �S � �i� 1 '��.. :1 '• ' t ". .'�e ,11 � �' �. 1. :'� �1 � n 't, �; •! j 1 • i� ~ j�� 1 , ry � .� . ,S t � � .'t I ��1 �� ' 1 11 1.r. ., . �, �.i J rr� �ti�•, � . J.r' �') 1�. 1"I � ~l " � �... � 1 . .� •� I � "� . a� t i; r,. .l ',�' � � ( �' � i .1'- •1 �:'t�. '��'� �� 1 �; � . '�, r y :i� . I� .};� a . � �, '; a` ^i: - �;. :. .� w�- •rI� � �� , •, ,� � ,, .�.; ,, : .'� ,,, � i ,, t ��;',, t �r� � �:. ii� � �i 1' I' .t�. .�'�' � . . �. �! � _��.�-1 `�� ♦ �� • '1' • t. , Y'' � . :��.� - • , _ ,1. i ,:.�, � ` , �: ,�.i �t"�i '�r i � i. � � - � � �� ; n � i nte.rests � � � �� , • �� t s ��must:��consult .wit 'avratio_, , � , �-. .�T.owns. :-�c�t�:esi and colun �e .� .,� ,�!- _ ,. , �� .�. �i �� .�,. 'I, ..�_ t� .J 1�:�. •� � �e� i ��' �' r. S � r t ,�, - . r ; �._ �:d h '� �. � � � :. � " '{. � .r �' r ti �' j �'l '�� - i� . :r .f��Y �� --� - _�. -: � . . �.�. {� r' �.�.• .':��.C�:_�(l _ ��. �j� .. , ,r� •� � .�� •�: l' 1. �ii�,,, `��J '!'.� .a � .�.�� :.1,�i; � � �' ��Y �. ��`' �' I• _ .+ �'- .� i' �'� �>. �-� i >. .'I'� - � •r. �� . ' � � �t - 1 � -r t��. '+.1 t r.t ~ 't� .i' } i: �.� t '� �,�, �:7D 547'�.36.�70i4.510� .3�i4'y�63:270,�,�. ,. ),:,. � .,• =�, , ;,� , . ,� R.C.W 36 . ,,. , - .-, _ ��_ . ,,. , �:tr. °�• . ,., '. •�� , .;- ,�:w,,:. .� r. �.;�� ,s:�.. . � , =,: ;; �.: � t' ��:� E •�( •r� r. � �/�'.. ) i � �, i . J'i. -� ��.r °^ �j •f. I �I '• . � � , t - - � ' `r. ' � l� , r! . •�. . '! i . 1�_ ,1,�� .. r=' I � r � 1 . �I �� r � r. 't 1 � i _ , �J. � . � . � a. I' _ ,' ,�- '�• ^ ;i. .� w ., ��.�t '� .� . .�:. .��:J .��.. - . � , i; � � I ' -- , '=� .r �� .. .. ,- ' ��" `t� 'i, � !" •� � . . t � :i • i i. � � ' � � . .r..�, _ 1 �� I , �'I .� �:j�� - .�� ( ��~. . . ~ { ..1. ., , . . - �'� ' �� hn�.cal .ass�stance:�_ . �� : , . . ..: � =� .,;:. . : f �W�DOT.�A�iation �m;ust pro��d tec ., . - , . _ , _ . ., ,. G , c. : _ ;' _ . ^ .. , .' �: :" _ �-':.' � � �,_ � - • � - , . .,: � � 0 5:6� ::zso �� ,, ��: -,: { , ; , _ .,� : _- :. r .0�:54�7 �36. 74A:�51.0 : 35� � :.63:27 ., � 3 _, _ _ _ � ^ R.CW �36.7 .. ., ..,�, -� .�. �. _�,.r �.:� , � _ �., ,: �, , �. r. �. ' h. •• .4. ..i - - i. •i. +1 `�. .�. ,�.�,� ZC• �' t �.-.� � - � , i• �� -�� :� =a: '. �r �1 �� :1�..�� .l- �k? `�I �`-" �... �� ;� •�i` '-k ,K t; z� .c,-: •... _� r. ) !.r ,l• >; •�� .-l-"i ..f::�'� � �• :ti �t 't o - l. ��" �' t. '� .t A `�' �: �. - ,, 1 � r - .�.; .�� • 1�' •�`� •`7 v �v ��• , � ; z. -�3: - ��r ,�• ':1:_, ,- -� , ,i: �. 'f, - ��.r �t•' .f....� q - .�. :1. t .�- �.�'- i� :! ii�� .�. �1,•.0 C� 'i'' ' .�� •t � s- �� ti. ,vti2. S.:'� 'ii�: 1. �� , .r° .:- t� .;�- �« - - _ .7 �7. `1� .Y• �i.:'-%.l i l � ��3 �� '� � � - .� "F;� ' .�,,. � � :v1 `r. t .i : . - . `;;� _ ... � 1 ti \ �i' ':'�- '1 i. �r: �� - �L �� ' ' •l '�S•' - i.��i .'1 :6' f `•i•' . =�� .}`' �it 1 \ �i: 1 •t 'i= ' ` � •I .r � . �� _� .�' •(u. 'i -�,. i ..t:-• , ;�: ,� � , , -�, - '�; . �,' -.ti. � � •r , �. - r� �. 's.t ��. r � •1. �� 4 �. '1 _ti. � ..1: '� � ..ti� ' l-•' _ ' I, ' 'l ��, ��,� • 1, � , 1:. � - � �' � - +�" } ; -,•'' ' -�� '• - � i. � . � - '... ,� i - - .} _. �. . - - . f`', . L i•. 1.' 1 -_ �� - .},•'. ��. .t,:�_ _ • . . . . . ^.�� . .. , , � ' . � � .1' � � . . - , . i .' 1. . . . . - . .. . . � - , _. . � GRANT �ASS.URANCES. �,,, ` � . _ . . . . _ . , , : , ^ �: .� � r. - : . r '. - , �; . -;: �4;., ��, ti;,;.;.� �, , � . � . :,- � . + - . . . - �� r.= � '� '` - `� ' �� ' Co.u�t� � ill.�take�.�a ro �riate.�act�on, ._ _�� _ .�:cr., . :Co�m� �at�ble�Lan� ,,Us.e, �.Sp��nsor..tC�ty & _ Y)..,, . . , _ . . . ��,....:.�., s ..._. . .p . . � . , . . . . , . a :: .�:�� , ti�. -.. � � pp � -p �� . f . _ ,:: �i=n ," `�`;`"��.-��'' �:.` -'� .,:... - �� - � �� in ��.the�:ado �tion,:of zonin �I�aws;�:to �r.es#rict:th�e � u� �� to��the.;:extent :reasonable; i�ncl.ud _ .g�, _ � p. . . . _ . . , . , .. . ; �� . r - � . - - -. � _ •� _•�� . . ' • � . � ' � ' . ' " ` , . . -_ � � � �� `` �� '�� t� �in �the-�immediate vicinit of ��the Air ort to a.ctivities. . . � : ,: � use of land. ad�ace.n y p . , . � ,... � '_��. �.� i : � ��.:�:'• j � �!' ti = �• � ' ' � . � �' r �� . � - � •�.•: l �_ S,,• _ ' � , ��♦ .� . . � :� ,. �� es��c: ��n ��:a b; ;�ir�t ��o a�. �►�r or.t� p�rati�r�s. �� . �_ . � �.;� -�� : , .�� . =, ::��,,�. �: �� :a.nd :u,r .��..s�,, Q -,.�4,.�.l, Y �� ;,,,.�� . p�,.... , . . . . , . } 4 [ . .,. . �:s J .� t.. " •1 ��`' • �` ; �.`. .�1� '1.. � tt � � - � ` t�,'� � .L' i: v . � • � � �•� � . . . �' � � �� ' �1 I .'/- �' _ ��. . • � :; - . , .�� h 7 :' . . l . . �•� • �� a � . . • j . .-�=�� _ � � . ��= .s. ..: , ' �, t � .. � � s } t � �'. _ . �� . ; � . .. r , . � : ., � , , ' '+ . . � . .,. , •+''11 '`n,Y . . ��'^ �' •' .� � � � � � � � ' f YI :t:�;1�_ � �_ R'! � � , i .-,•,� . — .-�t L�� s"�► � r . ' 1C�'?�.'' ti jjj�� 1 ti°e,+' :1:° vf"V.�"<Sa� � ,. ,,i.�� ti r �r�'.��4 3 � 4 rrY�}� �t r�� y� 'G'-k ".+F' '..'' �,�d�l%'ti � f j i� �.r.t�,ti�'�''" � ••�+� f � . �v r � i l � •' �h {� � .�_�',�t! �k 't 't '�G�t� • }�, t 1:� '�y,M .. 4��'� ty .��'i l °k : 7\ `'� . ,..+'" Y.^ ./ '{ J� h1 �t f� a� - `�'.a �t �'1 `� �� t�ti t� „ r4 �• r'�}r,�,« � �, � ,1.. � .}�� ,RT��I �� 7' ~ � / fl 7 � � y, � �t � � 1 ��' ��,f�i' ` {��• � � �� 1 �A._ � 1{.. �� ; ,y1'IAY' A `"� � r� ' I� .S„ /'1 � N�� ' fY � _� ? `'h t _ i J' t Y� r� r $` 4y *,'�a!'�A� d h J'�{+ : ��,��,Jye� 1�. i v v��G �A �` j�, » � � J�y� s�y�i S° � i � '�� `�W'� ' � �'` `' �:�. i'tk" 41��^� '?-�?',.p� ��I�C;�i ��[�' r' ��•R �':1��, ��,y�1J�'�L_}'�' ( t-. • ; _ . . r , ` � .� ? � �1�r�' , . • ., � �, • `l ' � ��,� ^ � • . _ 1 . � , I . .,�� , r :��.. .' �'��1�� ~4 ' ��- is- I I M � �.:- ,�' < = � .ti.,._ _ , . �►�� ..�, � • . �-^{+ �11,� :� '� ' t G�' � �� ~�♦ _ 4 t � f '� '.; � :. � r• �ioi'` - 'i.� � � •�r� l. . ''� ti � ; �It'• � R r �-� ! � � , .. � ,�~ ' � r � �f� � h � t �� ' , � / ' • � � � e , � V �,ff.'4'.,�. 1 , . .; e Y , ;; ,, ��'3= '+�=�, �� • �, ' tkl • ''� r � -ti� � ��; � � ' � � •'�f _ ��.,,,:�:�f . r� .- i; � � � ��, , , i.'l1hr�:.1 �.�� • . '{r ?�+31t ...^ ■" 4i �j�l � ��✓. �� ` � � .� � � 'A .�:,.� 74wf�1°tl�? ' e0 �.v_� ♦\/1 �� y 7 ` - '� - •� � ...'. � ; .�. �M.r.y� '�ti -� .� n� � � 4 �' • �� r ` . - - . ,,� , ` " i ��'' * . .•. �+ � . .- rf �!� `� • �. . +M ` �� ti y "�� • �k' wqY�� '�.� � !_ �f. � ��r• �'' -� �� • a � _ ,, ,�('1�' � • e � + ° � • r , � • ��L� � . :'��: � , �4�f �, _�Y ' • � ♦ �, `� .. :c • • `.' •, , .'� . ` ' `, «'. I+N 'r �� "' I�r.f � � f . �' �' 'IL1 � � � ~ -re�, �w . �. \• v�' • -� • � '►'�,•-1, t , . . .�,ir � ♦ � �! :!. dl�� .v. �, �f " � �� , �';,IV' �v `� '/' ^\ ,�} ' ��t� •.� �,� �b v • •,.� `� .M•� y"' :�. = v _ �ti .T� �r "�� '.i.�,', x`.,,,. r+ �; '" .� � • 1 �' - �►" r � , ' ►� _ ►. ,•� . - . :• � ` �._ �C..7. '�' + r '" . . . � - ' . . . . . . ,rr ... ./ i� 'f.� y,Z�9H"' 's � �.�'.. ^.,` f• 'r� ` �'�r' ,.. , r '. ..,�, .t. •,• ' ii � (��5� � " '.� Y � •- � � �!►'� � � f� � � . , t ` ' . � � • , :�� ,ay f�� 'r ' %-- �:} ; �' � ,t t v � � e , o � ' o � � o . � ' - • w � , _ � . , ' .-. . �-- ` ,. . ti� .- ' _ .. ' ♦ "r � .t. V '-�• ��1�, .�. , _ . � ,•',�,... . ^ L - ,�: � �... a�?t �' .c . ` r � .. . _ .,.a•,Xy,�..�.:; � - .. r.tf_ k � J� � y��j�r ��a,�j'ifyy � r `'„ - i.��y�u1 c i � ..' � !,i:� :.�. t ��.:;��.;�� ' _ - - � �i �� }�sf �,�. y �t y .. . � �y, ;x 75 ' ?i�,r�.f.,«�� ,,. , .. �•.., . - ti � ., �Ii..4�s� _. � �_�.1. �:i �t y��1,.� �" 2 t g � _ �. 1 'r1. • . ' J �-�:+� '- - � . . ._, . �� 1 . . . _.!r� i . � f � ` e � � / � _.. , �� . _ _ .. 1a�}�C ?y�'�F'�� J � � �r�� . � .'G ,,cy; - L':,"�q�� f'° �� e +-.'�` •:=`- ��' ~~�� - _ - � ` �. . . . . -- .. , - �`t'' - °--� r "`.�,� a; '�r �L' � . �r ~. _ ',. � . _- , •r_ • ' ��'�'S�-�: .� �. ..�qR„��r, y K' ,� � 1A�71 � �;t �� • - -• .��si �` "' ' _ •-�' ��. `� . •y � ' • � - ✓+'2+ ��' r �"° � � ' n`� �`� �. �a`�-�� ` �� r �.. � �1.. - --� _ ��• �i�. � , o - - • • s � - - • o � ;:�.�-;,-�� . .,. .. ;:-��'�"�'"--� t',��"� ` + �s,�, ' f '�'� � ��-�. ' '.�"r ; .se - ° �t'fI ' ' �.. . � f , . �� l r _ ` � y �...�„ - � � �;�►. ;� ,,.; F,� •r�t. � �: �" ,�, 5 � .r. �, � y • -wt� �" . i J' .�`�Z'��,;1,rti;s� �.1�"�� l i'S �� . � '+..V '.`y- � ��, ' � r . rt �� '�' '� "1� 'f.�� rt' 't� `� Y `� r 1 �`�' L � •"� r �J ; }� a �: � °"' - ' �� {; .. �i yi�'� r 1 7 �-.1 k � C`�'��.s. �_ '..F r- _ t R:k1�yt� • x��; ,� �-�;� 1� L�� '1; � � '�� " � J ��" � ' � � i � � '� ��n�`�R� .�� .. '1 'Y �t <' � �'�� .�. � '`� c �"i 't .%+� _ , i' ..+. O _ , � . , N +s,� O a. ►� _ . , '`,� s-w f� � t' :'�� ' .�. �'^` 6' � ` '� � -�. .- ... 1 , � .�.' �� 4 �rf'✓�� :� . � . . w- �+�:�. Y.� � C •' t � r�''� "h. �•�. ti } ' . � .� • v '' � .L '� + - � � ;} " • . i . '�:, �; 1 �� ' ��w �, tr �^ �'.-�+ ''�� 4 �1r�Z� 7G�' .� +'. f - � � 'Y .E �'. r�� '~'�'""�"�,n�'rl� �,;,'�},�..?�i »" .�� i1..��.�. �. '^t � t� h�,�14� '..�� +�... .�� a' '�- �• 11�' ,L, � � , .. .,� � � : t:��. � - �� r , � , v � . �. tiC • � +Fl; . 'C' � jj ' w�et t" %;.�f. � ti�n ;yt"-r- �„� � -� *. Y � �� t " . !`� _ - ' .r .��ti„ , •� ' - _ r ��.��:� ; � z a { :� ;�;� ��+ r� ��Ii� �+ f� � "�� y' � �� s' 2� �"�• -^' � 1 'r' ~ -r . �.r "L� .�"f'� - r>- . �. .. ��, ; r �., 'i,l p�C! ; _ - Z:� - s , i� a�� ,��.• A� 1 •F e �f• ��?`l`'��rr� �./`' � —, (� : � � � � � � • • � � f 1 ' ,i,., •` '�'�'��,� 1 ^ � - �= i � �_� + .." i �clr� " , •,4 ;r • y�n I ' y �� T � fl�V � �T,��" :f'i � '�� x Y ' �� w� T .� ; �i -�S •ti -� i' - �l � ��' -� `",,s�'� � v •l'i' ��7n' � "..., s • 7 _��r��t3�� l 4 -- � �+t i � 2< ��y",�-�' ._ "'� :� � � ' ' '� r" _ . ��. '� �'�`� ` �f *?`r.� �� r'� �4- - " �a' . .' �V��y��` �Si''. � Y � = �� •.�„�?"+c. �- � s + . - �� . • � `.�+� - � �;i �.+�� - � .. l�^1'�_��, '�, -. - * --'-.�' �[` •____. - _.��- .� _ . �� _ _ � ' • a� � t :�, .F- �' y �� , i � . �. � - �� j �.�•. l . t . _ . .t��-+� ( .�-, � e "ny'��,��•� f � �;A:'�'�='�•�� 7 ' �z:" ' ` t -'- l ��'�1�i�i�� .,l �'t% `t-�1 ,:};d'r'�.�r? -�,r': �.� ..i � •;� 't '�- �! � '�j•''.I( i . ..`". . 1 � _ � �. � •1••.•��.� .�� s �;y �� y '1 ' - ?' I.t �1,+ �' .�1�•''� ,�- .�i: ! • 1 !•� �.�� . �'�" I� - �.�� Ir.��:�. �' ;'.. if'/".:r. : ��1'/ ��"':1, ,S .r� 1• . �,it. •;� -� ,,' t��, •, • '�d . •,; -�;,• : i n • ,��' C , • �•i � : ;� . . � , . , [�-�-}�^.:. �' �• ,�' , .�t� '�. ,�`, � /�� i '� 4� !• '� l . . , - { ��. . , . . . . -• .. ' . . . a�� +ryf 1 � �:� ; � � t I � •�.� ��} , - . . � � n •� I` .� ' I. .'�'. � ' '. • I • �, ��,�_ �1 . _ .. : i�.�. �.... _ ... ��. .� , i� . . . •i!f � � . . . � . � � , . � . . _ . , � � ' . , . h � �1 M � 1' 1�' ( �' � r *�� 1 . � 1 y% y f :t � . r i - , . � � �'��t rh �R � \h It . �II� •� ( ,' r . ." �' l, I. ��d 1 �� r� : �_ ti � l.- . �� ., `�s� 1 ]i,�l[ ;Y . . . . . , .. . , .,� 1 . . .. � . . ,'�' � . . ' - . ,- . ' . . '• �� , . . �I� `. �. ti �, 1 u Qr}1 . �' • ri 3 � . . 1 . . . ' . F � y ` � c t ti� �..d�,�'��T , � � �� . . . . , . ' � �.�,�x+rl J �� .. � ' f � _ , � _ � � �1�� ;Sf �'R� ��„�S�ili� y,, _ - ► S.. � = 1 '� - . . � . ' . : . � . � . � . � ' ' � � � , ' . ��'., *=N f� /. �l�j�'��'��►�YU�"�'�(;r , hS�..�'�,{� �� r�`^Y� f `'. . ,. . � {; ,:� t t.` C,�, � i. �7 •i ..� i� �i�.r' � ti :c1y , dl�... . Jm . t' .�� •.t . '� i _ - - .�,•y; � '.' 1'; i ' � � ; �' ' �ti, I � �� ' r Ict(�~ ��'7�'� i . . . ' �, ' � �, � , 1 � � �� , . ' I , ,1 ' ' .� + �� `- k, 1 : � � 1 . L I �• ' � � � '. It��.�� i . � +� ' ' � . - i � t .�� .� ' +�'• Y � �v r.�. � 1F�� , � �� - �`� �1 , - � ', � ,.� -.�. -` �!I �I l, �it + �. � 1 �:� � . .1� � � - � � +♦� � 1 11 � � ti 11 f, � `( ti � � � I� � ti �.. � r •,� • 1 �� • � . �i~ ,�`:,.• � t �� ...._ 1 �'' �1 � i � r�l _ i�l k� 7♦ I`' ` � 1 f � l,��y�` r � t , .... � S � � • �� . , •.1,. Y ... : F ! ,1 1 ,t .� ' t ' ��i ' A 1. � � �.,'� � if .i � , , ' � , S:;C�ommu�r��ties=are��expanc�i�ng�:; 7.�� ;r � � ,� � �hr��: , . . _ . � , . � � � �y � ; ,'. .' � . �.�N.�. �,.,,�1 z� :u� �, � ti � e.ve,l,o � � ' +� � � � �,.; �, .ursu.ing .dens.e:,.d ' :,__ � .� .,� .�k„> , ,. . � .� . , �,. _.. ,.. p�!:� _ ; � � ��1��•� �..�.. i,')� '{:.�,� 'r'S� i ,i;.� �' � ��{;i<. .� • .^ •� ��:�L. .� �� . 1 .. � " i � /1 i+� . � . `� f;c.j r t ��.� .i ' � - �� ` � tr� �� ii.� �- r •� � : ��Y �i��+� , ��': . ' ��.� �� 4 ,- �•. f . �. i �' l) 1 . • � 1 ,, Y. ..1.� � J4t � � � � �) I :� 1� r 1 � � ��l . � :� ♦ �� ! � �. i �u: i t I �� r � i � r �l�n "�1 1 �t�` . i �,; ' ? ,, ' N � , �; ' I1� i t i ,I� r 1�, �r.v.s �_ r1 'f r rrrl 'i } �' � ��i�� (k F�+�r ''.�1{ � � i ,... ��,.. �, • 1 u ��t ��.5�.� ±+� ?C r( r � .� `,. f�'(�, i..hi�-�7�� 1 ��'� �� .ti� r e €�� ' ,. i_ y j. � ,� r �; r � J; e i a i , � s j L� ��.1 � .1JL � L,I I�� 1� .�1 1 : 5 � 1 I . � �� L� i! �t 1, �( � S . t� li � - � 11 �f. , ti • , �..' t � . i ( � . 1. � ' � a . r�.S + Cr• '� 1 , l�Yt i� ii ��. r� . �l� �i �� l .. f I . f I ;-� . , � ,, F' �w at, � v 1 i SJ. ,. . (�1 wJ., , , �, i , i ti7. � 1 � � � I � �� 1 I � � � �� t . '" j I i 1. .� •} �� 1� �r�j.� �, -- � _: . � .�_� V �.. �t , (•� .�. �, �: �`� �� '.�* - ' . . � . .��1.� . . � i � .�. ;� i�� ( �,N:�t 'f.+' � +��1 � 1 � � � �' Si�.� ti, I�� 1 r '{�� ''. �.�;� _Y �.. a.� � �,' r � . f , ��r� t ;.. _.�-; . -� - P .��. � . . • A�rports :are surrof�..,r,�.d�d J �: L ,�,,� « Ir �. ; 1� .� ..� 4 ��'I�7, f;�'�Pij`�1 �� J� �` ;Lt�'1 �„ ;7ij� A 4 � R � ur �.Y`�� ' � !� ,' � � . i • . b"�;' 3�11. f � l; 1:}�' �1�. ��, `T�{:'r� ,t,r r 0� -� y � � ` r ' • :i � , ,�� ' �71a�'1.de�/e O � ��,n�� 3 �� _ " -�.1,, � �`� �' ; ,•-•' �- r �'f _'� ; `,:.� �+ �' ., i � t �� N �� t':� + '��YS�� i �� ..1 ��'� ' �?!. r �� • 1�1. J �' 1�. j�!�U�� . � .�� ' � '` �� 4 ' �,� � �,�� y "�`�y � a �ii'' r � ��;� ,t �� .� t� � r.l�N� t�: ,t�'�F �:o � � � r. �� J' • J,ti..PJ" �: •'�� ti� !'� r � ' �� •� I � � � fj' h � " �} 'I . � ;�, j(, ' ' ,l I��hJj p �' w� �. � " . hy,i� -j"' �+� � . � ` �! � k• • �� ' � � S � �,i ��. '�t. ��^ � � � . .•.. ih• 4 , �� i� �. �. y�/ LraKti� <<r-��L �;t�Y'� :�}��f'� �'�''.��` � .i� ��y .u!' �l�..� 'y )M"_ [ lti_ �+ ..�.J�Sh�;;S��# � . �. _ ' �S'�_�� 1, �� . Q� -y ," � ��.M1j.,lti1� - ��tih;�y� ,w.r,} � �r', ;� =•� . .1•;{i ti~n;J�p?�.r:' �4S � �. �. .ilr .�. � �:'�•• Y. .r�;� �Y�� ' r �n �:,•� {- 41 ,'i:�:'. i• ,.✓ .r" '� ��. �' f r " �` .i: i' :� 1 � a.! .�i }'� � 1 , _�- . � � f 1, ��, t ,� i i y: � �'i r� �%` � 7'„ 4 �' . �..-. r .� • � t�'. �� . �i� ; � i �t. . I ' ; � ��.• yf: � � 4 '�N�.11�. �:P"��'�. 1,�;� J.� � t t `. ,�i ?.� �t�,x•i �Zt��} � y� �,��J�'�r.-L��.ii 1 ��.� �• ~I�ii�' }�'�:�il .:-. � Z_ ^ � � r� � „��,+--. .�, r _ � �,�';+ .;� r . ( �lj. � �/�: r .r ! �':• : � •S � �.}�'� �"; i � j '•.."`'�. �: - ( r. � , N�11 �: s11�1f 1 „ C1��.. m�� Yf.�N:.y� �' �5 ;""�:i �. ��!j ,.� ' �/ r a��l �. P� • l.�t 1 f J i 1 11. '. � f �. 1 I,.r � � f. t �f�. '=ri. �� 'A' � 1 3 1 � �' jR�'1 1 I`M^' i It1 �i �,�, �t !"�1� .:)� �� t �� }1��. ,. � �'i� �r t 7 .h-}� i J' ..1��1��! 1t�'4 �,�iz.r,i�,� , �� l �� t ��t� f �te. � . 1� i �' " , � i tti. a t. �� '�ti +- t�� 1� � i1' �E, ,aJ��,y� - `s.�� M � '� r ', � `!', t a '' i. �� ' i t n �.'i 1' � �� %,.�` •i _ �w,;�Yl� `F�^�r'•�r"� �r.�„�a �'S -0' ')s ' ' ' l +,� +' S I • . '.� - � ' � ' . .' a_ � � �0��1��-f'�};M � �. {-�_� � 7 }� ��•�r , �Local'�Mand �use��autho��ties� ' �� : � jr n ' ��; I , � r � Y � �J `' , � � . � ..-� .,�� , . .� . , . . . .�� = ' ' � � � - , 4� '_^ ti � S r+lZ %�='.;' ; :;�. �. � �f��: ', ,� ` � '}�' '. .� � ' iwa� s well �i�nformed��ab,aut � j'''` ' '� , y " `� '� 1 .�.id 1�� ,� �J � K , .« ' , ' a � - . . � ;,' r,' t L � t, ;,+; � .r � � .,, . ��- � '- � ` ' '�r�.y��'rf'�"!iF '' :��t».� f°y 1 � '� •.es �( `�,�� , :I! Ce � �' a. � ( � i . • i :'A' "'*: � ti � adverse: im �acts on the A�r� ` , s�f��r�; �+ n i �� - � ��_ :_ +•� �� ,�� ,t r. � e � ��'�1 �,,,� '�' r f ,� � 1 t�+ ..� � �_.�.y � b1'' .� \� �.� � �� '� ��' '� � f � . �,� �}'�'� �` �v i "Y r j Y��' 3�+�(�1 : Nr�.��:;� �1�C'�,:r"',,�'�'�"� �_ .. 'i •Fi' �' 1 '' 'y �'L'��'�� k�� ''� � . � e . , . _ � � ,,�� f ��t � A .� J �� f,a�w.�. iii � ' . � Y� �� T;, } �` ��- , + C �~ � ' �,, • •� ,'�� S1j . �,' � w C� � ' si �y'�.'� � s '''t • � ��t, �z 'i ;ti� � �' ri' �'= ° 'L�.':.4 � .�t" `ti Wly�� .,Tf%�,'' r..1.:.4�' ,� :�.' �' �} t.r �t�,." �•',��.'�, • �... �.�,: � �.. U .:'� . �':�t.�. � s�.kd s:�,"1: �fl�'�� Ik r., . . . � � �' - �t x . tl�' 1 � . _�. ,.��,., V� Z i�t.�„ ��'� ��.. ;\'.•a ' �L;�: - ` ` � v �� ! . . .-t 1 � • _ . �. ' \ � ♦ � ��: t. _ '� . • ,+ • .. � . j h. � � ' tl� 1 t,}� > 1 • Z ��14� r •�� •� �4 1°� �� i;f1 "�. -t 1.� 1 �� y. �� .l��Z !� ♦ • �. i� �t Z� �'1 {_.: �.,i . t � - t1`: ! `'.` �'��= � � j � ♦ s' 'j:7T'�� .�� .(�Fi .}'l.� � �� • + . �r� -1. � ' _:�� J � t.�.. 3�` �i :^ �� h.t�4�y��'.,35, .� �: '��','.,� H=J.� ��\� �i�f� ��i�` _ e :•� t ,. �,� ��h '�' .,.�r � ` j S Y' ' ; t.�. � � � .� Z�. .1�. •; y. � • � � . 4 ••• . • ' `��• `, 1'%� 1 " L '�•, � t ,�•• � . J � � . '.�� ~yl.y�'nal~ i�i. • ..�.��; � � / 5: 1 � ' {` ' . I . , � '' �'•.: �, ' �„ ,� ` 1. � `��;�� ' � ' � 1 t � i�� ' � "' ' �1 7 4 �y�� .i.:i. �' _ , �;� � �i ,�y; t• - ` i - ' . � � \ 1 1 � � • 1 I � �� , 1 • � f ' � }� �• t ` , � � ' ` ��a - .' � 1 , I ` . . {,'1 • ' . 1 ! �'��.' 1 ♦ , �� ' - 1 y •�., . . � 4 ♦ i �. . . . � {�. � �1 �� • � �. ', 1 � ��. . . y � L .l. ;i ♦. ,r� .r.. 4 � `. y� ._� , t . �. `�- ,� .'� .),.. ♦ '. '• • at1�' y , ; .. 1r ' i t �• � � �` 5 1� � � '� . . � . �� , '� 1 . � • " � � . . � , J • � L, ' � �� ' ,�' , , •;, .. ;G/ .. . '�� • • . . ' � • ' i � .' 'J� � � �� it t'ft y�•'`��.a't. t �Z ... . ��5 , ,..'.` ��•,.=:'• ' . ' . � ; . :,:• � •. - . • � ., 4 � ' - • .iT.' '�� - � .��.�•:�. ,�� , } ♦. � :♦ � , . . � t; �,`• �•f.'�� `i ' ' ' :�`•'��'.,l •� ,. ' .�w • �.� ` ..�' :, ��'r� t :. . `.�t �' �� C��1"�'y�-;�;'x.� �r�. `� 7�''� �.�"+'y.1..Lwro�•t....�:.� � � ir..��..�: �1� � 1 e�e.w•. �lw� �•a •�a.r< . . ...� �� it. r �1 .� .�i ; . '"}..�'�=� � L.�-.• , �� .•: ,,'��: ... , r'. , , . , : �.� , :i K ; .' ;�:. : i'; � �,��t." ;.'; '.: • d ... 'e.. , • , � . � , •�, ,,, ti''.:� ii s,, '�.... � , �.. •��-,�' i ' � � t � �; � . �;` `� ` �. � � � . � . 1 �• ,' , ,. ��{�� i �, t s o ', e. ti Y' f � �.�.,C� V `• � , 1Y p �:r y ti�:� .- . r .. -� . . . •��^F' ti 'i�., s•I��'., { "'ys� �� . �,�.= "r_:�. . ti�, '�. . � � r t�`Sr�� l.' y . Y r i�Rti'i � . .�'19t v� '.� { " i y' • �Sl ,r .'� '�"S .t. '+i�' �it..`x,}.��:. ` y �" ��i►�`" ' ' � ` - _ 2 ._ _ ...�-^ f - _ - � - J � L , _�. - ->.{:±%w- �-�.r,,�' s"'t' • ^� � _ _ . _ . -�' � �'",'� ,� :`�. �- �; ; � . tls; ` fnt�� yr,� • : , � _ � ` . r. try" r '�, �S.`+ � ~�y .. �} ��! :r.�.�«'!'7 '� . _..,_._� � . �-.. ., ... --. ....�.. �,.- '-, ' . -.. ':�r..,� '� ... . ' � ` � � � ,- 1 . - '�f�._""G'�^.+-- ..�}-- i �. ,, ..y,rp� „ � i'f�rt�"!'R'=''°.'p'= xiste��'��li:-��;�r� , ` /" ' ' _ • f � _ ._ �� , . : l .. �l�M�f , / ,.��;;��r�.e ^ { � �� , r . - _ . - i,� 'T�~�t: '�'^-=�: =2'a��^,.�`��. ��. S 'tvX ! � . } n '� �2� _—. �''. � ' �— - � ^ ' �`�(�,� ` •�if.s l `,-�'- __-��, it!i'�a,� `~.tr4T'"` _L: � F +� ' . • / 4' � . � -T ��r- ,� . _ _ / `- r •r�� +,'-""�' „�'yti ' 7 — � ..,, `„t ' � ` � R f � s�_� . . � ,r � - ` � • t_ �..� • � •'i�,1��-A '� "�T - _' Y. � � P `. t ' � '� x •�) � = �: t l� �� '� '�;.�, _ -- 1� --„ ..� _ ti � i t' � e - l- , � �--�l. r , � � . ) r �M'�'��'' •:r . ` '� �+�»J Ih � �� 1�a�i�►.� .� _�. �� -, J s ` �� . ' . � �� •.� �� '� '� �,7. �'� r w : �uri�?��+`�� yf4: 1�''1' �' �. � ��-'�� - � _ _ . .e'" "--` " s +. ( ( , � -( Y ��ya i \ �+�• S7, • �.ytf+��" . �� .�I ,} �r.� 'L��... � --. �. I �� ,��.+� �if�.: ; � .' �� e� yTP l ..� ,1� y ry�h�#""^`��Ztt ,� �r ' 1 ° 1 �f � , -- s .� 6�� . `_-�� f � u� ,, �� `i - . r [ � � ' r r 1 a �. � . n '� - 1�:,�. r . .� S � f �.. �� 'R��.r�ik'��i�'�} ry �`�'1+''ti. � � ' syfr � ��Yd��r..� ,S /"�� . 'Y� �" =� (�,:a„ !4,: _�.i�'� :�. ,,� , i�� (., � � ; }i � � j �r., � y .�,.' ',�i� �, ;�. r � Z �t �� it" "'�, ��ti�i i��ti `y.� .. �.. i• � ► �. � i .. � ~ � � �.•. t � A1 ..'i 1��.�i 1.. � � � .lt ;IL., ,;� t0 � Y `!�J ,�,'t� v �� ^ �:3 = .� - i � � . T .-.� 'v'� `i,�� ri � «��. 'J� \ t � �� • _ 1 4, �`"� .�„�'7�! ��t 1 �� ti� �,. � �r•' ��i� � s : '�,.�j.�,�� , 0 1 � i. �r' �' •w `� �i �,�. ;� �'C� � � w q�/r�� { � � ��r ;1: ]:.�t�.-� rif7;,1 �r� � ti �~+.�' r � � �,`-.t,. ' x� r W� ti. , � '��",�%� r � : ��! ..�'� r � : � � � � j� .. . � . '� . �,,7-y � .� �., h �Il`P'1r� , ,�, r r - I �I, '� • t v� 1 �.�, �i Y „ 1;' + I. . . - r�� f �.� . ( 1` ��. ', � ISN � �� . Wy1�.r' � ' },' �. .. - . . ' � � , �' I l I � '�: .- . � !r.�,{•.�'C.�'1j:� i�'J".:+] F �:� 1 ?0 � . � � �� . +. -,r� : J71 �, I }1� �T 7� - � �r � 6. i ��5� � '�1.. , � . , � � - - i � , . � .,�, c �w � ,�' t �!, � ti. I ry i'� �• •. Y� - � � � J �. • i �'� �{'� y t ] �'t� +'�r� �tr.l.1.�� v �}r, r �I.1, - ' '`�1'...��c��p'�,S -. � . � - :.+�.a��...�Y�. �. �i j�i .� � r ��. i. �� r`T �.'�.: �j� �Y.�':I. �: �i �':C .. Y i� .� .��1� •�f: '�- �;��:��y YI�L}:��,.+M1�t� 1� �'.tn+li..--:`':`-.L^L . .. � f�,:�rl.�, +j.��7uf�✓l..r�f! r4�t..,�; P.4;.IC�.6• h, r.4��.Ci r.- a . ) I,.F, . I• ? �,� ��, � `t�� { yt� :3, r M1� .L } �'i SII �f�' •�.1. _. � I � ,.� l �.t� r��,� �'" '. ��r� i� ,,, - _.1 - "•�y+��+�.,,�', s ��; '4 �.' �� ^�.+wa.k�. �r �ti�; i;T. .h� t .�J ,ti:r ��'r Lir �i� - ' r f ` '� ` i{��d� � ",' �� '�fh , r�3�l��i � �t .�.� r �� l.r�iy� r �' - , .� , --" . a ,._ ,. - � :f, r��,�:.� ��.^� ��t�_.FI - � ��.`��i`yt ��'t� ��. ��.{ � �j�J �� i w: _: i „ �r � ` ��a � � ��, h ]t^ 'r�,l � �'L'�L � . � � . � � r � i � � J x � � 1,� : � 1 � � � �` � �, , 11 J • Y v. ,�„� r ;.iW'�� _ : K .._�'S''��'� � , � � _ � � �. y j a� �. � � -,.� � 3 � r ?� y +'� �,�.k' .b I� �1 �''- r�i' `= �'"1t+,.. � i _ ` � �tr 1 �' _ ' .' . ' . . , " • • . •_ .- 1.. . . ..,� 17,� fX;.�r'1�i'f ''• - –�r � . ��.. 4 - . � .�� ti �•r•��., � ._.._' •"r.b,•.J'�N�{•�,�:,�j'�•�,�,..� . � `"'1.i+�— �� .}. � ::�;•3y1: i �:. �� .� � - - � .,. �t:r. . x > G � '-• L_ � `'�. � " i ' ,'W , ' �! 1 r r ' . . _��, . _ • � Y � _ `�,�� .� �� s � k �... � - �,.'.�Sx.�u��l,,�u_��r ' . . -`� '.:�Y � . - � _ ,+.- _- � - '�f:,. � . , ' �+1�*n'►"?"' ~ � '�...."�?� � .'1�. �' �� . _.. � r J � r . . A y � � • � .- � � _ rnY7"N, �`-� t ;J� - � ._ _!�� '�►�� w � t � ��i ��J" *C.=��y �-��l� ' �+� ' �, .� � �'� �� 'II]C N �M^ _ ��.T.I• .r A•��r^��?�`�r��I� �' Ji.:l,l�l� �"� � f �� S.p�..'"-'''./s �� .}� 'Y. _ . ��'h'� � ,�i' . �� .� t• i i �,' '�,.. r f.t' I ^ � . i Y', r � : � , ,• '�� ...�-r. i � i: r • � �, .: � � /r * �c � . _. '�' �w � ' -� r , . ,_. � t �r..,,:•r` �i ��r ^"�--- • r .. �r 'c �, '! 1 •i r � r' ,1 , 'ti., = ^+� ��r- �. _ r � �4Ht � t t .r � F . ��j� ,�ii�_'�'r'� �..s� A'i! :7-4"' 1 �� r � '�. `,n "'`'�I � L�~, "�L.� 'F.��VY �'t�-, ky r • Tl� i+y . ,� �_i • i � � '��7M� ,� �' �7'� �al�. ",M n� ��. � . ' F. • �, .� .' i� �1 .n� � .zy�� 1y' w.�.!iw� r+ : .,� � �� , � �_�. �I� � T:' � • i . � � � �: �' w i..� 1 �.r �.� � �''". '�(� _ � hr ,�� _ � i � r`��.i r . _ . . . - � 1�; �„l a 1- y�•• ''� � J�"�-rt;.. 'k'%...�1.- r � �!a k ' r :r .>� � `:��, )� �' �� + .�..^ i� ��, •w. -" -- "� •a � ., _.�;,.. ,t .2.z• .i"'; ° ,�:c�'{r�, _`#' ,�_ , 1:tii � i SG'�� r�r' �: ^� 7 ' e� � : � t1 �t �- c� +.r� C �1t�e�i ••..r�.sf �' �+" �:`�f� C�,: ` '�� "� M•� � �.�Q �'� k:Y' _r�� kl..:r ��.4.`.Y• �"'' •y• l �. ti ' ;7 '�• � fy,� _t ��"'". � . � ! ,� I 'L ♦� �.e�s tt � ��. ...7 �,� � I r r, � �. �'t,��' - 7 �l + ' iJ .'7� i�� , t T � .V � ' .,� 4 � ' �L' . J, � I i i I ��a � �-{� ,'i`i I � V C ± ��..�� ,� i � .. I.'� - ~ _ ""1 '.y.- ./�w�� 'f � � �N`�� GIi9'��nZ.i�)y7 r •, ��1r4.. 1 1„I` ' 1 -� i C*t k.�.r.{��o-'{� '�'. � 1 4•, 1 ..�,r,� �.....r' 'I _ ' L y} ti� {�` ��"� - � r!. ' �� r .';i� ��,At�'' :%i "` • ' l ' ! ':K��e�Yf'�'1 ��_ r r+ ��iY:;�� t ti `l � �!r'r I�l � , � � � 4 � • � �; r, i F — � 3'� � y i *rAl Y 1. �F � � � . . '!''- .. , ,C �{� , . !. :�'� �� 44K� ~ L^ � r ,_'n. �.'Q. �'r .� v ^ � t � � l �l — � - � i �,, t ` ��t�,.+2t4 . �.+._. - - . "';�';''"ry - i�te � ' .h�� . ��'� . .� �t �� ic � , � , � 1 �'": Z�" � � �' r C - F ; r ' .. J .� 1+S?y y C ,' ,�; ,.,,,,� j: ��i;y'Tr' � �•.,ti : yi� µy��`�c�i.�'� , ,, � (� _ � � ' �. �� i ,� � ` �i: M1 "� � � �h ti � �,,, _ . � -r� �w,r .� �r.","�?l. ` . � � ' ,�l�`},�'.u-�,v.�l?�f �� _ � xa tT`_s�. �%��. -� �a'ri��'�:.��'?!<y�� ,� �*�ti �1 ��'rY �� `�/uL+� _ �� w h . � `'�'� 'i r ti�t� X I+�'�; ' Q�,D��'� , r p ° � , , y ��.�� ' l;�_ �,;,��r,; i �� . �:�-_;,�;:.;. �� `~�`'^ � ;�� -` ` r 7 r h�� _,�'�:�7i - .t I rY.. I J .1� �� ' M1 .�CI` � 11+..� ��t�`. r • � , , I � ' l+•'• i � r •.5u �� I _ .1 - i `� . �� . �� '1,.�' � ' � �"'�� ,�4� �,�,,�' � - �. � fi � �� , .. y ; ,r'�z .� � t 1� �1 � 4 �.,F f • � I �,��• '�V� � . � , s , , �� Y . ' .�, _ -�. , ; — . � � � ; . . ., � � .� - � . . � �'� �- "`' r `%'; _ ` �, : , P � � . , � . ` . � ,� � I - - I � � i � - ' .� : i -: i. ' � • I ��Y .l 1 � '�' � a :< ,�- r'n.��. � ;., ..,.._,,� i � I ; I f . `� � . �� . � ��: � MAR 2 � 200g � CitY ofi ,� �� Washington State . ��Jk��i� �� Department of Transportat�on . WSDOT, Aviation Division . � Airpart Land Use Compahibility Program � City of Spokane V alley � � � � First Read.ing of Ordi.nance 09-005, ,Amendment to Zone 6 Public Testimony March 2�, 2009 � � Go�d evening my Name is Carter Timmerman and I represent the Washington State . Department of Transportation, Aviatioa, Division 3704 172 Street NE A.rlingivn, 'WA . 98223 � � � ' First, thank you for the opportunity today to speak before on this important issue. WSDOT �Aviation ad�ocates for the �reservation of aviation facilities, safe air � transportation, airport capacity, and the mitigation of environm�ntal impacts. The sta.te's � objective is to ens�re the viability and adequacy of air transportation for the state and its citizens today and into the future. � _ In 1996, the Washington State Legislature amended the Washington State Growth � � - Management Act to require cities and counties to protect airports from incompati�ble developmsnt. The tegislature was concerned that land use dovclopmen.t ttends were negatively impacting airport operaLions from incompatible uses and development. Simply put, WSDOT helps jurisdictions protect their piece of the state aviation syst�m As a part of t.his role, WSDOT Aviation has engaged in a Long-Term Air Tran.sportation Study (L.ATS). A few trends discovere� in this study were: . • Aviation is a growing mode of traasportaiion � • Use Qf �orporate aircraft is increasing • Reliever airports, snch as Felts Field, are becoming increasingly more importaRt � • Thez�e is more point to point business travel throughout t�ie state These variables should be considered when making any aviation related land use . decisions. ' � � We understand that communities face internal development pressures, but they also must realize that short-term sQlutions have long-te� consequences. All too often jurisdictions unl�owingly compromise the long-tenn viability of their transportaiion assets by� Pnblic Testimony . City of Spokane Vxlley Page 1 i allowing the encroachment of incompatible development The results of incompatible � developmeat include: . '. • An increased level of risk for the citizenry to conflict and litigatian. • The airport's inability to operaie as an efficient economic engine. Tbis not only hurts the airport, but the sunrounding business commnnity. . . I believe we would all agree that it is better to plan proactively than to react years down the road. The intent of the airport ovarlay zonc 6 is to plan pro-acdvoly. I recommend thai the City of Spokane Valloy reconsider adopting option 4, By adopting this option, the C,ity would significantly increase th� amount of si.agle family residential developmeat within zone 6, a use that is incompatible widi the� current aviation environment. I com�e before today to offer a solution rather thaa just observations. I r�commend tbe I � Gity Council exploze the idea of promoting a mixed use environment in zone 6, rathor � than single family residential or allow optioa 4 for part of zone 6 and use Utah Street as a divider. Thank again you for the opportunity to speak before you today. Cartor Timmerman � Aviation Planner . WSDOT Aviation � 360.651.6312 timmerc@wsdo�wa.gov . - � Public Tesiimony , City of Spnkane VallcY • � Pagc 2 � Washington State �,� Department of Tlransportation WSDOT, Aviation Division Airport Land Use Compatibility Prograrn City of Spokane Valley First Reading of Ordi.aance 09-005, Amendment to Zone 6 Public Testimony March 24, 2009 Goa] evenii�g nly �1a.me is Ca� 'I'iuimerman and I represent the `Vashington State Department of Transportation, Aviation, Division 3704 172 Street NE At'lict��ton, WA 9822 � First, thank you for the opportunity today to speak bzfore on this importaut issue. WSDOT �Aviation ad�ocates for the preservation of aviation facilities, safe air transportati�n, airport capacity, and the mitigadon of enviroamental impacts. The state' � � objeccive is to ensure the viability and adequacy of air trans��n for tl�:. st��t� and its cirizens today and into the future. In 1996, the Washington State Legislature ainended ihc 1�'ashingtun State CJruwtli - Ivianagement Act to require cities and counties to protect airports from incompatible development. The legislature was concerned thai land use development trends were negatively impacting airport operations from incompatible uses and development. S impl �� put, WSDOT helps jurisdictions protect their piece of the state aviadon system. As a part of this role, WSDOT Aviation has engaged in a Long-Term Air Transportation Study (I.ATS). A few trends discovere�i in this study were: • Aviation is a growing mode of transportation • Use qf �orporate aircraft is increasing • Reliever sirports, such as Felts F'ield, are becoming inrre.��ingl} IIlOI� lIT1�QCiclilt • There is more point to point business travel throughout tl�e state These variables should be considered when making any aviation related land use decisions. � We understand that communities face intemal development pressures, but they also must realize that short-term solutions have long-term coasequences. All too often jurisdictions unknowingly compromise the long-term viability of their transportation assets by� Public Testimon}� City of Spokeme Valley Page 1 allowing the encroachment of incompatible develapment. T1�e results of incompatible development include: . • An increased level of risk for the citizenry to conflict and litigadon. • The airport's inabiliry to operate as an afficient economic engine. This not only hurts the airport, but the surrounding business community. I believe we would all agree that it is better to plan proactively than to react years dowr� the road. The i.ntent of the airport overlay zone 6 is to plan pro-actively. I recommend that the City of Spokane Valley reconsider adopting option 4. By adopting this option, the City would sig�nificantly i.ncrease the amount of single fam.ily residential development within zone 6, a use that is incompatible with the cunent aviation environment. I come before you tod.ay to offer a solution rather than just observations. I recommend the City Council explore the idea of promoting a mixed use environment in zone 6, rather � than single family residendal or allow option 4 for part of zone 6 and use Utah Street as a divider. Thank again you for the opportunity to speak before you today. Carter Tim.mcrman Aviatioa Planner 'WSDOT Aviation 360.651.6312 timmerc @wsdot.wa.gov Public Testimony City of Spokanc Valley � Page 2 � � V16ashington Sfate Aviation Divtslon Department of TransportaQion 3704 172nd Street, Suite K2 ! P.O. Box 3367 Paula J. Hammond, P.c. Arlington Washington 98223 Secretary of Transportation 360-651-6300/ Fex 360-65�-63�9 'tTY: 1 �00-833-6388 wvwv.wsdat.wa.gov April 6, 2009 City of Spokane Valley Council Members 11707 E Sprague Avenue Spokane Valiey, WA 99206 RE: Ordinance 09-005, Alrport Overlay _ _, Dear City Council members: The purpose of this letter is to clarify and elaborate on the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT} Aviation Division's proposed aitematives. On March 24. 2009, WSDOT Aviation provided pubiic testimony at the City Council meeting regarding the proposed zoning code and map amendments to lands adjacent to the Feits Field Airport. WSDOT Aviation is on record with the City of Spokane Valley Planning Commission and the City Council in opposition to proposed zoning amendments that would encourage the siting of incompatible development adjacent to Feits Fie1d. Also stated� the City had not yet adequately consldered airport operations or the long-ferm impacts of its proposed rezone on lands adjaoent to the airport and within the airport influence area. To address some of these impacts, WSDOT Aviation offered two altemative amendments to the proposed zoning amendments during its testimony. These two altematives would support some changes to the Cit�s proposed zoning amendments for properties tying furthest from the airport operating environment. The City of Spokane Valley planning staff presented five altematives to amend the underlying zoning designation. Each alternative, with the exception of the no alternative, would increase the residential density within the Airport Hazard Overlay. Residential single-family development adjacent to an airport is generally considered as an incompatible land. It is the one land use that can be most effected by airc�aft noise, low flying aircraft, vibration and fumes. Airports are generally considered to be industrial uses with noise levels and operation issues well above norrnal neighborhood thresholds. Additionally, land uses within the Airport Hazard Ove�lay may experience higher incidents of aircraft accidents. The area generally affiected by the cunent application is Iocated witfiin Zone 6 of the Ajrport Hazard Overlay. Zone 6 encompasses the airport traffic pattem. The airpo�t traffic pattem is that area within the airport operations areas where aircraft arriving or departing are flying at very low altitudes. Additionally, according to the recent forecast developed under the statewide Long-Term Air Transportation Study (LATS) general aviatlon is expected to increase by 23% over the next 20 years. It should also be noted that the current Airport Hazard Overlay is based upon Felts Field's primary runway and the recommended runway extenslon docurnented in the Fefts Field Airport Master Plan (May 2005). However, Felts �eld has more than one runway and not all airport operations were fully considered within the City's analysis. Two proposals are offered by WSDOT Aviation: WS.DOT Alte�natives for option 4, Airport Hazard Ovcrlay City of Spokane Vallry Page 1 Proposal 1: Utah Street and East Rutter amendment to option 4 This proposal would recommend amending Op�on 4 by retainin4 the existing development regulations north of the Utah and East Rutter Avenue street corridors. The area south of the street rights-of-way would follow the guidance proposed by City Staff for Optlon 4. By retaining the exis�ng residential density in north of Utah Street and East Ftutter Avenue, the City would: 1) Discourage the encxoachment of lncompatible residential single-family development adjacent to the airport and protect the airport from incompatible development. 2) Reduce new residential exposure to noise, light, vibration, fumes and risk associated with normal airport operations for nolse sensitive land uses. 3) Allow the City to achieve its goal of maximizing its exlsting infrastructure whife protec#ing �the most critical areas adjacent to the airport and within the airport operations area. The area north of Utah and East Rutter is under the airport traffic pattem and is closest to the airport runways. The area has the highest exposure level to aircraft and e�eriences the highest intensity of aviation activity as compared to the area south of � the street oorridors. By implementing Option 4 for parcels south of Utah Street and East Rutter, the City would promote the utilizat�on of existing infrastructure. WSDOT Aviation has performed a cursory examination of the sewer and water stub data provided by the City of Spokane Valley. WSDOT has found that the majority oi se�v<�r and water stubs are located south of Utah Street and East Rutter Ave. WSDOT has found that 185 sewer stubs are located south of Utah Street and East Rutter Avenue, while 43 sewer stubs are north of this divide. Proposal 2: Mixed use amendment to option 4 This proposal would recornmend amending Option 4 by amending the existing development regulations to allow mixed use development north of the Utah and East Rutter Avenue street corridors. The mixed use development would allow a range of commercial and office development. The area south of the street corridors would follow the guidance proposed by Ci#y Staff for Option 4. By re-designating the area north of Utah S;re�t and East Rutter Avenue to a mixeci use � development, the�City would: 1) Discourage the encroachment of incompatible residential single-family development adjacent to the airport and protect the airport from incompatible � development and airport operational constraints. 2) Reduce the public's exposure to noise, light, vibration; fumes and risk associated with normal airpo�t operations for noise sensitive land uses. 3) Would allow the �ity to achieve its goal of maximizing its existing infrastructure both norfh and south of Utah Street and East Rutter Avenue. WSDOT Altern$tivcs for option 4, Airport Hazard Overla� City of Spoksne Valle}� ��V � 4) Protect and enhance quality neighborhood development b�r discouraging new single-family development adjacent to the airport and airport operating environrnent. 5) Protect the most critical areas adjacent to the airport and within the airport operations area for development compatlble with airport operations. 6) Discourage the encroachment of incompatible development. 7) Provide more opportunities for business. Currently this area is flanked by both industrial and commercial uses and shows signs of moving towards a more diverse settlement pattem. This proposal would allow the area to continue its transition from a residential area to commercial and industrial uses. This transition would compliment the alrport and future airport operations as well as adjacent commercial and industrial uses. WSDOT Aviation recogn'rzes the City of Spokane Valley's past p(anning efforts and encourages its diligence in promoting land uses that are compatible with its a�iatlon facilities. We would request that our comments be made part of the official record. We thank you again for the opportunity to comment, and remain available to provide technical assistance. Please don't hesitate to contact me at 360-651-6312 or timmerc .wsdot.wa.gov if you have any questions. Sincerely, . C _r�.t�. � Carter T merman Aviation'Planner CC: Dee Caputo Neil Sealock WSDOT' Alte� for option 4, Airpart Hazard Overlay City of Spokane Valley ' Page 3 Pa�e 1 of 1 Karen Kendall From: Timmerman, Carter �TimmerCQwsdot.wa.gov] Sent: Tuesday, Aprii 07, 2009 4:32 PM To: Karen Kendall Cc: rsheehan cLDspokaneairports.net; john.dobson�membersonlyinc.com; John Townsley Subject: WSDOT Proposal Attachments: Sewer_Analysis_low.pdf: Mixed Use_low.pdf; Retain_Reg_low.pdf Hi Karen, AttachEd is some follow up documents on WSDOTs proposal and GlS examination of ordinance 09-005. PMease feel free to contact me if you have any questions of concerns. Thank you, Cnrter Ti mmerman Aviation Planner WSDOT Aviation 360.651.6312 timmerc@wsdot.wa gov 4/8/2009 � • • • . � • • • ' • . • � . I - - � � � � � � • • � ' • . • .,- . __ �._ , _ . _ - � Washington State Department of Transportation, Aviation Divisio - -� �-'! .. ��`''�►:�' •,�'� �..� �S � •�"�� . . . - ,, � �j� �e+�,,!c� � ''�3�` - �' ''°�� '�� '�� , o _ ��'�► "�`� � '��y�� f � • -� � - � � � �.±�►�� .: ' "� . . . ��'.'� =��►�a�� .� �� +�,�. � � �.., . ..� ... � � � 'I, f ^ • � �, .. ��I�� ♦: �' �� -�:�- �� , � - �� . .. .� �►� . � `� �� .�. �' �� . �� ►�,��, � ,. � � ..•;ti�� .�� . . . . . e �� - •., . � �. � �� . e�,�� .: " �� , ; .�� ,:�; �.� � . . � �- � � , � ee ` . .. . �� ' , � •� M� .ti�� ... � ,�,�� ►,�, � ° �'� A l�� . � , � . �• � i 4 ` • `� � r. � ;.' + �� ,_ �� `. A ' ..� . " �, /`J `,� S _ � �Y �� w ��i��+��I�� _ � � � � �/ �� .i� ii�ii� ''� �"� ►`iis �� A ��" - _" S �� •r��; � �i�; L�i�"�� . � • ! ■ • �. •• ;; • � �' '��.'�`�i.,� � . �f� •� . �',; . r��si �O�M" �►� � i�l'� �t��t • .►�`. N� � ��M'�M�.f�� ;�� S � µ iw�r � �1f A. � } � w�y � � t ` ,� L.;»�w ! R� y �. r j4• �� * � •rA.,�.�Y N� Mf� �•- � � 1� � � �:``�M C•w •N A�u�u y �,�� h� •• �`��Ay A I " ^ �r�11s_`n♦ �� p � � y� � ��,�� : �u��S�,,r� "� • `� : . � • �ir.p .u��r v�� G Ae+'•, •�• � � , . ,�•�, ��uqi�, Y S .�� O� .aM�r � ��h. �, �� •'! � � 1 1 : I 1 • 1 I • « � ra� ��'� Q 1. � � � ' •"�t m. • �`' w�+ .t . •�� }.' �`.'s � ti, � ► � ., • � �wr�r �i:a� '+i � r 1 � �R�� •r_�jw.�� c !`,-` ��s ��r�. � ��`1P�� ,�°'�"� ♦ a`�, . J � r ��'. '�� y a: � � s+�' s�w� wa� � � � � �P Iy �: 1;�'.4 ' ' r � �r, . . �i►' ��.:,� i�i� s �� . w��='�''� ��f .�a '� ;r �'' wv��■■. s s4�•�� .. •' . v�.+t,.� . �.1 y� ti��i � � � ti , �.• . � . ti - - y�a� 1�wr � zN y�. 1 �■ • M • , ��N ■•IM��' '� t �. ��IA� /� � 1 w� �• �• r d I. \ � • • i . . , � <��irr�r�11/M��H �!. � � �....: • tl�1�w�A��r�� if�'�� I • �' 11 �. ��i � . s��rrr�n� •��N��qw�� 1M� •�� y�..•�K�� bY►'u��i1�M��r M* :ZF� �� NN � ��N� R . w��y s� a + ��.� .!� <d �i�r+r� s��•,�i/ �.: .� �rMM ■Ma�� .f��• � ■s� • � rMw M s�N.' /� �•/w��r��M� �••�aM�it�l•�{ a� M�r:��=•+: r•�My��tN�•��..i��{ssr«��w��' sNw � R� V -`. �('� l�� '�� A ��/r ,�� 11• fp �a�l�' M p�.��.� ��A�YNK •:,��}M • �M ��11��M y * .�,+r�r�f�M ! r•''��+� . , • . .� r�• wr. t� •f�� r►.• � � � �� •� � 11�� ■ �^� •'�. � ��«� .�f . . . , . :.� �� Z �x sM� R . � ��I i��r�s� S .�• �,,. �� • •� � ■s �� • rr M r. � . ._ � 'I�II.� � � ��' �i i�s� r� �' � fu �t �11M }M• • •I �'. � j � ' - t �R�SAii��si. .:�w.'��1= �3i. ♦M �� iR��..• ��r•P ��N� •M� ~ ��. a � r �/�� i j/ '� / L � '. i' yy •�� • _�� ►:.� rw � sR►Y�.i�r h..i� •� ��n�� y�w��rasM tN� , �f� � � t y''�,' • !��"I►. � �` J � �w��i�■r +� - Y�� • •I��i..:��` . iu awq ��v� �M. �r �, . r � � -�� . . � •M N �� 1.� �:. f M � � n�• �" O �' � �' ' / � ,�' • a r ! Ilt ` �M �i y�� • _ rM �` s As' • a' ��. ,, � ! r �<�i� .:�C' � , � •� � ��Nr�y ftr■ �NM =' r�r �' ia. j ri'r!t.. /1 l�� .��.�NY�� S��ff �.� � tMM � R �f' �� h r .�' ` �, _ sM* sw�■ ��f Q .� � �� • �w� �• � en• � �r r� , . � t ' • r � � s�� •rR� ��u� .� � �. • • r p �... � _ _. � � .r' � ,wzs M�: u � ■►'• � s ��.r s �,n�• • • �►'�iw� r i► �:i: ��. � �• � � . ' ` � . �„ � � �w�� N�MN Lr�■ � f�s . ��iw �r�■ j�A�w w ♦. w � R� �• J:.' �J t •• �� • ■ � s �� r � .. r n f , "�'T� �w �ti �':''w • .r - � ,.' � �� • . � �;rt �r �;;�i�Mw��L.':.•r„:: ,%?;_::±`�;' •.►�I�!��'� �;:�.�.�h~•�iM��ii�'�.: : - y . • y -� /�� 1.1 �/� . . . . � � •�rN!..��r r ��i � ♦ . �s \' !. V��Vd��•rv}7►i � � �� r •� "� )�,' i4l `�1/� �' �ti ' • - • �, .!�► � � �. O��`� r '"` .r 1� �� '� O �5► �. • � ��'. yJ �� _ '� �� r...� � �,� , 6�. � .,� ', � _ �l��'�' - - _'_ -- — - ti�• � � � •. ��- !� �, _ ,�,� ;;� _ � %` - . . �.,��•.. �c�`' ,,�- � � � . ... � � ..��- � � .� . �� - �� . � � � � �� _� .,� � _ _� �. � �► �:wsooT � • � • . � • • • ' • . • • . � � � i . � — — � — ashin ton State De artment of Trans ort ation, Aviation I W g p P - Et � �' �", , , t � � f r �` ,- -' �..",,,x, .;t. .:�., '�, .�.�. . , �t' 't' � • It'„•,�,.� �. ; �'.. ' i. �� . �;;1 _"s •��r . . �^ �� f , � � f , r � y , 3 � ..,,� , �� r � • � .J � ' A' _ . .� � �� ' ' �� ,��! t"• �'�� ' �N� y �•� .. � � t�� ` , a • � � r�� r � _ � 1 � r_ 't .Y�'��,'`��'�`' � �' �' �~ .. , '� : :�: ::� � � # . , t . � �' � . � . , �'�i�,� �� ' � '�, � .. ~ ' ' '. � �,�' a `� � - �; �� , . `'',� + ��.y► �+�,� �, :1 , � � � � ' I'�� •' � • 4�� . �,`� , � - � �+ �• � � � � �• � � i �.,, •�< + '�e� � � � . . . . ��, � �, ,t _ , ��, e 4 .� .- .3�, �� '� . ..�a� ��, -� � ��. � . � h. -,. -"� _ e r' : � - , � ' � � ',, ` � . , . r �►� �� • � • _ . y - �� / ~• A� � �� r- ��. -'� � ., __ ,,. .,� �. � � , y -► �' � � .�� ' '� �'�� ' �-. � M� ` j �M 1 �� i�� ' �� ,�� ■ , -.�.- +�`�•.i •- �••.- , � � � • � • � ~ ��•�� 'Y � � �� '� • �� '� . �� w' p. �.��r � �~ i��'�r+��d i��':v��_� j�e , . • � �,, • ,�'i �.��_. �'�.y�.,� ,Y�,��,y.•«,�i;��b M,T "v � /`• . , � a: n s� , s� �s• i� � � �� :�� \ .�� '• ,�'� R�ir��L.i� • ��. a. �� , �, ��tw= . �fr � • .��'.�1•�rt► i ��+ �I �A�M��s � b � �� ,'� ` T" � r► � � I � ' _ � • • , �!� ' �� i�� r� V: ..Y�� e � � � � .� �N.�=� i! • � • � ��'T-i� �� t ! f � � % � � • I I I • .��ww •� � • TM � ! �� .��w�•�� '. M r � �. y �iwS�iw��M► e« • � i; �`G � � ~�� . • aN �: ��♦ ;� �i � .: � � ...�e. � ✓ �; ,.w;�'�'�P � . � ,�*wi�� ,.j��A= � .� V� �i • ♦! �ja�'�N�� r.�:t�' A '��j{��i3� ' :� � . �f�M • ,y �r� * ...� - w.� �� •r ..'� �. y � s .s��'�r �� C� ��±� y� � ��i'i � . �j��N��R i��M ��., � i . ��'� srfN'w « rt��:� r!r k M � � �' � ' . . �j,*��tyM�t�l:�tt� �; .� a ��1 .M� � ��r�f�'NrR 1 � � y �� »�i J � t , �� . . � . . et � � `. � . . . i1�� »rrN r . �s� r . �r� � � yp► �� 'y _ . , � Z��M r�� =Oi• ■► �ri .��. N w• ��• r� ~ MM �� . • ' . .� � �� r ��y� \ � !�'.':.ii�:+. "�L.r*�M+l�'�{„ -��!i�i�r.. . � '� �*-.y„ .Ti� � � .� � � • . � �M��'��i�� wirw�!� �� r�'�s��!i. .•�,'+ r� �.w � • p• . �r� "ti�i ��'_ _ •/ uti �/ •��K:sN�iiM� � �= si��!! ��..� -r� `��_; �iM • . + ±�} � �.,.. ` • 7 � �� •��/r��y.�Yw��*♦ �• J ��•s��w r• ta�K � �'i�� • 1�.��s� ), �" � M�� . � � � '� � •� � �a� f� ss� � in� I +� •:�' •,�_ •�±�"i x � Rr +� ��"�� ' � + + ' . 'i � r+�i�:.:��*� ��.� `�j��w R� �� `;�� - �' c 4 ! ` '.'.� _ ',". ' . .. 1 �� `� ,�' " .»,��:ti�.�,,.• � �-� � .. , �.:��;r��l��r� �i � �'�� . � � � � . _ � + wi�M w �►� ♦ � ay� �� w��1� �.'��1� �� A�y�w � I - ' 1 ; � . ,Towrl�af-Nkf�wood � � �. .�-��v �`��,�I �„ .'r " � ' ' .r' � ` , `�� ,�� 1�� sf?►i � r 1 ` � '"� ,. '�', ,,�;� . �; ,��. . � _ �, . � ,,�. . �� .' � � \' r: �� T!�., � � _ ` � + �� ,�� . ti • - � �.• �� ._ �_�� •� �IQ'! `.� , � ` ,. � � - -�►�. � ��y � _ '�, � .� — r t." �j; �`�,� . . � '� � �� . • , T WSDOT . WSDOT Assessment of Sewer Stubs in Zone 6 of the Airport Hazard Overlay _� _ � ��e . _ - -_ ..-_ _ _ ..�.. • • � - • - • • • • ' . � � • �,'j . -K ► � _ _ - " -i • : -- �Ti� " '`' h tJ* R ";!'� �1 r ,-.�p+_�:�� -,- � - : - '`�,��r�' �►,�' '� �,': �;:`�'� ', Legend i •r '� �: :, _' � � C, :��. < p ` �a �+ , � � . Felts F I� Id +'�?` " . - - ' � ..?�"'r+- . A . '� 1 � �. . � •: ' �--. � > • ',� t � � � � .a � p � �� , , i �l:�/ � �i f' / , '+ z V i �' � .� ,� a ' - Parcels North of Utah t� .�j�_ .`r� «� '. '''...� , 1 �• � � _ _ . .._. w' � .- 4 . _ +j Parcela South of Utah - � __ _ � ,— � ' " _ R , r • . �(�, �. ' � �� ,,. ,� ' z,:�� . ' • �' ,.. Zo ne 6 ` ,r ; � �� /�' •':,' �" � �'�� t � + ��"'�� w � � ;�� City of Spoksne VaNey 4 .�� - - -- �- - rt��. ..� , :: Y ��'11 4 �� 3� �•-�1' �♦� Si` �� I �'�`�� ` •,• ^. , i� , � }, p ,� ; ? . �' r•r- • - TOVm of Mipwuod �' , ,Vry�+_ �' I . •� �' • , + ` /�"'� � r f �� r ;, ��y � w ,.�; `. • � �� ` ;�, �,��, ,, _ •�..� _ ./,^�.ti ,�h;% ��. . `\ ', J . �_ F` .�r��i� �.l' _ Zone 3 �s� `� v► _ , ` � _" ti , . t �Fv •�. � . `� �,' � r . `� I � `"�,•� 1 ,�A � a`� ,� . �. �t' .. �,�.' '' �� • � -�• {c �� F � . ..:�;,., � ,. �,: ' Sewer South ol Ufeh � •.,,1,.. � t 'Cf •i , � .. J� � � ' . f_ . . . �. �. w . . -`'�' ' _ � ��. 'C � � ' y Y �' ,.� •. - �u� , � - ./ - ti .� -� �. ' "'� \ �' , � I' � 'r . ��.� {`�' ` „ ° � _ � �. a y , , r .:,.:,� �' y .�� '� : Q . , 4 � :.�,�� .;e ,, � � Sewer Nor1t� ot Utah y �. ^ � / \`. � � , + �1� •' '� 't�• M - � �' - ' .'. .V..L� r a� �� • �. ` f, , ��, � � ��s. '\ . �, '\ � �. � � ' ,,,� w.A � � 4 �... •,/. -•`.�.' J' � �. � � i - a �` � 'ti �* � ,:�'` .� 1 S1 : � :`, � j�., • y � � - ''R�n Rl �e � O� �, i: ' � �.r ,?�'Sa ` � L .! SpObf1@ COtdlty ��y5 .� •J �`-�S .r� ��. �,o- � " r � \ � J/ .�� .�'' �� ♦'t� ��,7 ,'� ��' �` •� r.s• f.r� �_� •"' �Y. �' C f '" '"D �'�'� ;�?"� ; , b�,�� t:�, �� 1 } ; . ,�� ' .,• � � � '��r �� . f� � •� y } .�I �_. r �1 11 � • �y.d •' j � 1 .! I �� . i �a �' ' � . ♦ � . f . .; `.: f:. �1 � � � . � � ` : �. f ♦ - r . ♦ . � • ' �' f . ', J ; % ,�,� � + �ti�.�"�' �� a, � ' � � . '"4 : ' f � �� 1� R. I �` � ' , � •� / p � �� _ f� / C��r a R�. '- t . �1 � �� + :` T �'�� .�.?�,..� . / / J � ��'� ' �'-� ; w�, • , .1 ,•. : •� ; . � r . z�r• :: � , �. "='�y', / : ^ 7' ' ,`/ �= • - ' .��'�'� .�}�� :e� . �.. ' �f�� r / .; �:`i � . ��_� � � h._ .. v I � . ' \ , : ;R � �( � - �'1� i �.• 4 z �' �e' r • '�, - ••y �.. - . ��''� �; � � •,� + •;,'.� F �.• � � ' ��y ".,� � � i Y. l�'�.,�•t �• ry � � �~ ti , •4, �� '�• � ' W • ' ��l� j � •.-� , f �`, � \ .�ti.. �'� �` �� .I. �' " � �Y �t� _ � �' ', " ,� , ; �'� . , � .��. . +�,�� =- ' •,: �� ,� _ � � z- . � J �: f 0 460 920 1,840 ., .♦ I . , ~' "' -'+4 ^ `'r .�d '�`- ,+� �� `• V '{ ��l� � T, _. . j ',• • r � '� �' _ ' , � r,�*s ' % �.e.� ,. '0� . �.'ti, ,� Feet ; r � ; - • � .. ' ' ry �� ;f`�' �; : , �-:. :f N � � �@@ � .> Tn. w.tw,ql«, sld. aaMmmt � �.'. ', • � � . , •� r ,,� '� � � d Tra»potinfon. Aviaion ONban � � �' , �` � � . ? Q! rtrkes ro w�rtmmry, ropnyr►l�tior+, I �/� � y �i �► � `'',� ` . ` ,.. '�i.�''�� - � .� .. or Quuanr� of �ny kind np�rdY+q ! �� ✓ �' , / 1 ..,f�. ` - - •'� `. �1 e8herm�psoro1l�er(Momutlon ' �. . � ,�A• ��4�. ... _ ' ` � r• �, ", ;. , ! ♦�•''� ' •�' ��,p�T'�.�,�^-.�.``�-�..• . . .� _ (flflyld�QlflfN�i + � y . ' . . _ � �,'' ' �' , _► � ,• �: � . .� 'a - � '` �� ' ,, • r v f t .�•�� *` ,�• ' :.►:� '_�.. +� RorebACoadtif�0rfrn� �e l I �►► � ` . e , `` �� o NAO1f!]HARN81rtaPYrr j V `' � • , , `��. �` �•'a�� " - •�� • • .� • • w�nn�onOo�F�s�eC2 _ 4.� ;% � . _� � '�t; <a '�.. �� • _; ti „ � 4 � �, , ,ti��, ti , � �� w 1� Y `-� � Pro)eron: Lu1t0�ACCnOfnld • � Cmk , ;� c p, r •+ •� . � � �,wr...t r,. " : '•-�'�.. • • • `�. ' -• .. , • . .. � - ,� � +� .t;, ' • �� "' a.'° ' Cnr�dlry drter Tirtrmm�s� .,. ` .. ,� � �, ♦ d � • � ` ' � E�� ,r .��' ,+,� � ' ItN ��' .,^! � � . y� t � � e• '�ti � . •.^ -, � .. ,. ��' .� '� � �i. � � �� .� . •' +� � � y �, '� , • '.i .i�� •, '�,}',� ' f.�`• ��ij �� `�+` � ' �, � � , .. •; �'�+ -� .�► t ��+ � ��'�` � � 'i' �C � , � . T .� x, IA�16� A �j' ;' �"�y, �. L - Dab Apri 6, 2009 „�' r ` � ��L�' V►� 0��1 C/i .'r �`Il�,,,� c� • ��'"' �.'1.� � ' Q �� , �. i � � • • �� ;,. ~`'. .�;ia , ,:� *,;�,��.� ,. . � �^ �, r �° � � . ��. _�� ` — — ,.d;� . ' 4., I �tj +.. . i �� "�� ./�• . �� _ . � . _ �.- _ r � s� Page 1 of 1 Karen Kendall From: Timmerman, Carter (TimmerC c�wsdot.wa.gov] Sent: Tuesday, Aprii 07, 2009 5:01 PM To: Karen Kendall Cc: rsheehan�spokaneairports.net Subject: VNSDOT Attachments: Traffic Pattern2.pdf; Zone 3.pdf Hi Karen, I would like to added a few more graphics I made during my assessment of Felts Field. Cheers, Carter 4/8/2009 Traffic Pattern for Felts Field �_ �.� � � � •. • . •• � " � � • _-. � ' - �,#� ,�`�; � �� j �>-- - �� {, % � .� � - � � � * � L � ; �� . "''�'; �' Le ge nd ` � C �,�� ,�� ,Y ��_ �� ,. ��-��.,�.' ",�.,r-# . , . ��,;r"�r — `� o„ � : ,� "„'' Runwsy 3059 � r. - �.•.. � � ., ; e.�' � , � ,;; �. c ,.�, : � . 1 . R �' � v� , (w y � .�, l r '' �� I� � �` _ I �� _�i '� �. .,�. r � A � , _� , • Y i � ,. •.b�� h- -��,L {'� ,j�'� .�:� ` � J ` ,r�A! �1 R��:�� - Runway4600 �'Cr Y ��'. � ; �j ,. ,' •� !. ..., z � > � ��, .��- � �.'�� r� � - � �:.. � . ,: � � , 4. , �� 1 � � 1 . ,�.� � , .� � .� j . ` '�.�1.I� r rT`�1��1,�'�� '�",�� S ��?' �t` w'� -��r� i:v' .`�� `.�, • a ' . �y�� -.�' J- v a� .:� � y� � �� 6 � ` 1�.' �' ' ��`;��;'�V�� v.�t �` ��r •�'e� . 1'� r� 1� �t�. ��.�5' . .� - Mq� d � � ��! I ` ',��'A� �* � + ` � F1 Yi �P w � o*.�� - �• , ,y�.. , "y �. `� - � - Traffic Paaern �'' �"�. 'L «'{�(_*'�.i,�..��` :r � . _ � S' � �' ' � �.. �, t-",/)�!' h��`�! ,,� r„�.� � j � � • . '', ,' �� _ Y. -�} ' r., _ } • 7, ti� >'� , � � �y.'`k � �`� t .�• , ' � ' + , �''•� ��'�"�`�;',�`n,� ,'„�. �" ��_ ,r ` '�s- .. � � , City of Spokane Vap M �� M . ��` , r t � • �` 4 �I ' v .�` � � - i �r-j':� - , � . . � L •I �' � ��,�C �� 'T' .�; �� '� `` ` �� •;J� • - s N ~�`��- •. w • � .��;�� .� ��ir �� 1 ,y_ 1: `� a w ��r� .�� Q' 'TC• �. Y:'' -i - •„�.� ^ � - Pa rcie'� ��h �� VWh w �� . �; : � �� ".� •4� • '�`� ) � �. � � �,�I .r � � y ? A �' ��'. ' tr .�t�4� 1 � � , r � � � y � � •' �' �r� � t�� ' ., ` . � q1r�, �'r ' _� '�+�� • f ;�, � - .� �� , '� � Parcels North of Utah �� '�� '� �� r�l'. �t�, - �•�i'; �'�' r • . �\ - . � y � � � , f'^�1w j �� 1 '� // � � s M J � . �� . � `�:��'\`� � 1 �^� � t �� ' � ,•r'•♦ � .�- j � .� �� ,� � Y": � � ~ ��'� Mj � � `' -�• 'it: � + � I - TQWII 01 M�IIW�OM � � t��% �. r r � • ' :�n ��- T , �_✓,�.- � � , '. _ •: s; 4'�F } � ; ' � . • � � � ` ` �, • '�t � . . ":�` � � ,, �� r ' � 'Y � ' �"�� '�� f . Ufl ;�� •'�;�> .�� `�,�.",�' �, �, t •r �,�y� , ► �?� �"_r. �.�� Spokane Co ty -'� ; ;;�, � '� 4 .. ,�� Y;� :�.,. '� ,� _ �� + " �, '., `, � * � �� . , • � ` � , ^!� � �� .. �; • + � �� ti � � y�ie ' �' � �)�, `•, y � ' ,% ' - • ' � ` • '' . pw '` !�� M - . • . �;. :.�.� ,^ ,\ . +.• . 7 `. ' . «`�'r� , - � �i .' - .4 � ;�� ' �, 7 �`1 �. r ; ��' . ^'�-^ �� y' ' �r . ' � _ . � . __ ti � ` �.:>'..a... . ' �" - - � �.. ., ' � r( 4 .�✓ �-.., - � , ' - - -- -- --- ��y(�, � �- . �;� ,�.,�� . .. � . M 3, 1.. 1 ` ti Y. ♦ , �. �. �� ,� • `� � �, , ` �•' 'f ' ' � 1 � � N �1 � 5 • w _ /I `/• * .� � , �t ;' � .�%�' s'� '�•Y `_ �Y � L �t �.�a.. • �!�, �' �� ' n'L .�/.� 't...�,,_ ,r. :�,1"� '. �.! ��5`�:�� ,�.� . � � `� �� `�'T-; �Y"�' n '•�.'' ' .l .�•�� •�• 1 ' �~__ ��; � : .j �. Ji.` ��.�`�7�� '��:'' - ' - M� 1� ti�• • ��f r � , ,, �'��y��',y ' � M� '- i J� � % .!'t� �+.�.� f r ��T��'"i�+. ..� `,� . � � ,e �',�''�,'.l ..�1 • `'' ` , � ,�; i ' - � `�� r � -� _ ~�'„��:��7�^ � �.� .. � Y � ♦ � 1► �l �•�. , ' �.T�� . 1 7`�`�i..� , « / _ ' A L � • � •M� �, , ,.�, � � . � � � ` ` : n.� -.1s.. _�-- .- �• , ti' ±, tl ��` `J�� - � ' 1� � � �' ♦ ' p � ,,,� . :i r �.�-�_ ',� � . A �,�• . ,. �, �r ` ' � _ . � .�c��_� � : • A �' �� y , �� s, ;�. '+k .r 0 750 1,500 3,000 , .� •- --.,� "`b .,�. �~. �.��f 1'`� ' ', ' `� � , . ! �. • `,: - ' -+ ;- ��; '' - .: b. ,��''. {; ��'' :;�,;,, �s��.� •. �� r. .� ,� ,!{,;,��.�.�w, S _+ � ��, .� •r 1•- _ � '�' ' �'il�.�% '' '' �" F�t � ' ' ,--'Y � {�..t�. �'! �,+ � ,� . • � •` �- r � `�^ � ��, ��•��' ,� � `� �•.- • �.+�. � i :. s . � '� � �. TTw DepsRmenl d Treropartetion, � �� - : �., .- f /f•'' '� �� , AviAan Divfaion makee ro r►a+rreKy. '� �.' � �. ` �� • � � r' • ;• 'c' - ��_ r��. �' ; •• -�� •, rsprsssnt�fion. or puran�ao ot �ry �. ''�� l � � � , ` �; � .• �'� ��' � ' ��T�,�� , � 1 � '`'<. ,i �. , knd �sp�rdfnq dt�ar m�pf ar othr ' t � �'= � •�� .� r ; . � . ` 1' hfOmlrlDn provld�d t»1fi1 . • . � , � �� , '•`��.�. � • . � "� • `�� .� `� . , � • ' `� • � Pro�ected Coadinats System: • '� ; - �y �.{, r 'f � •�,�Y ; . •� . • ,•• � - . '� 'r w '� . _-. ! . �� 'r. r " . � . � NAD 1983 HARN Stal�Plina �r� , "� , / ' _ ' Y � , ' � � .. . j f . � ' �-'� a . VWstinpbn South FIPS 46Q2 �_� � ^• �� , ' - i, , �+� :;' J': � `� � ,;+�1_ . "� � �! ' �� '�• PIO�lCtbrr. lemb�r! ^ ''�', � . � � ' � ��t�` ' -►- " _.Y �'�j�. - r �♦ �i V . ` �� ' ~ � ; i� y . _ .., � � �, �y � - COfiO1R1A) Cor1fC .� � �ti.. ,'� , '1 � i y w � \ � � ��•�� J y � —.��,' i � "f �� ' ��i� �,p�' ��. �' � �- � ^� � " � t• 1 + �l - � � �• • y �!'} ♦ •� r ' f T fTlsf1i16r1 ��; f � '�. •�-�` �' -•:*'� �� • �i , * �... +�� . �t °+� � . ��y +� : • � Creebd by Carti �n `.� , +,�•� �•, e ,�.1�. ��} .1 .. :��j/.` �'� ' ' ''' _��. � �� , ��'�' �' ' :�l' '� ��)�,� .�MY. �! �+ .��"�' ��.�`_ � �. +�7� _ . • �[' • _�1 . ��~� • � �! 1. .'^ � .�4 • � � i�L1� � �J '�� 1� � �_ Zone 3 for 03 R/ 21 L �� , . . � � . . . • . � . � . __� _- . - .L� � _ �r�:� , , _ ,r., - �_ • ;�— �, -, -,�- ., � ,' . ��. .? , � T r Legend �,�'_ �� .. ' . . i �_ y� r � -f�.. � /+ � �� '' �.�" -r .. ,� i f �► ' ► � y� ' � � i., 1.. �":j .s � '. ~'," • I, , � �.��7 r, � "� ♦ - . / 'ti+1 � y� � a - A � n , `•.✓ •�+ � r.! ` Runwey 3059 �. p , , � 7� ` l j • �. , � +1" �C ` � w IA1 �Jl t �. �:�il� ,' �'' ��.�",.L .. _T b �.� ,r r , �y��:� �.lt� ��„ ��,' 4.� 1��` � :�, � .�y. •Y •� i�? �t�a a �1 1, .�1 - � ( • �'3: � r t �; ` ,yt�, � ��»,. , 'a� +� 'r ' > +, � g#:�• ' � ,.� ' � � 1 tr . ►� ��' -� , «.. �. S► � . � �" � R unwey 4600 I M ,� �� ; �� {1 � ��{ � � R'�, ' .�'1�� v . \�`�S' , ` / . -.. �t�� '�' �� % - a. � ,�� ►% � �. 7 � 1; ,� � �,��,,ti-,!�.'�1'.°�'�;��Z�'::'►.: „�� ` .,,• '' ... :• �• . ;=.s�'.�►' � ~ t �C.� • ' ��" , ~ �! � Zone 3 br 3059 Runwa � ,� , �* ��.., r . � �'v. 'K, a � . ' i. � 4 • - • r � � . +- �•' ^+� , . .. .;.�"J�'..• �.� rJ,r. . :. . Y . � C �� ,�t;: . _ ,�� 'L`j •�, ` . ` • �y�,� �;. � `? � F .�. . `,€ _ � �1.�; -,K's ;- ' . � � � . . ' Y�l: . a ► �, � 41 : ' i� •., ��', ,.* � �~.�=3'� ' i°, � . • ."T''- ,� .�' , t � .J � d'� . _. y z i' } � M' �• '� � ZOflO 6 �a� '' � ��>�' ±ti^l��-��+ � ,� . t ..�; t� j ..� � ��, � i { ,�� • �.1� `� � ,� �:. �.� j� ,, , . :►' �, �� . ..'L t � '� � i{ �+�j}� "7,�+. , , • , ,• S > w!. � 'PJ � �� t. � . Parcais South of Utah � ��'.�. "t�'�' f ~� ' :�i r '�' ti .�� - �.h�..- � �� r� 'a .�. � � r ,,r ,t . ( T y� ' l , t. r _ - . e �� • •�L .; �J � . � "Z 'r � .4. � � �: v.�J' � � ! -•. �•' •"�• •; ��1. ~ `��'b � �• � , � ♦- �,1 1:.� .. a \�� .� �� 1Jr� ' b" . � ► ��,,'�: �I �. j � � a � �'� � _�.� ,Y ��C,� � � : � � c . •.�T�. .�'� a �„<� w k r,cr � � Parcels North of Utah ,, �� !�^ y�'��'�'� 1 �� RC 4 `, ��T� �, 'i r i�,; �� ; ;�1.��11i '!�l' � 7�� c'� �_. �'�'' ` f'.�d . � F ''� 1►. ��.�t - ,. � S;�c,r '�., _� �,,. .:r � ;r�;.�r • .r. •.e. .«.,� • ti � '�t�� - Tovm ot Mipwood v . p. �a 4 !. � • � i � 'S'O 2 � , �' � yyy r �•S � '� � _ � � ? � � J•, �s �� ' "t S41 r1 � J. � � y , � � a l � } � �� ' t/ . �, ; • J� 1 � c : � -! �� '1 ��.. a_♦ . � H ♦ • � l • � , s� � �{. . � . � ZL1� .� r ''�� . . _ �,� x � , � �-, � �`� �� . � ,,, � �'�,}�,r w �..�'M . . IrlM � r ) � . �: : . • �., �. ti . t : . f _. � �r . � '��i , �s " �. . i � y .4 ti �. . , ��,� , � , , �, :�. .r �,"' � � ;� ,� � *. : ;� , ... ��. , �...- S Co �� }' ~ ♦ .,� � l.:�y/�I. .�'� � f �4 f;.� ��•�; � �:��`�;�' �� Y" �""1 � ��. � ' - ' � • ti . �. �� • �y « � � . , t - ' � ' y .� •1f »� I►� �+ � :� .'7' � � +� �, • ! Y '� � � y Y y�, . �� _ • � � ,�� ' � ��r� �� V ,� ,�.. .�,� '��K ` � ' •: , 4 T �'' , - � .� �� . . - ,. •A wa f �jj�i��lp • � ,�' . i � .1 � �`� +yrfr� ' "• +a!!� '{ • a -� � i , • � , ♦ er . � i�l�C' �' r� � •�� . ti' _ �'�... f ' �� ' � � �- �`+�0 �"'.� � �- � ( 1•. j �� .� rj: _�¢ �, �� ,. ,� . .� r, � � T.'{�� +� � � r � � �( ) II�� '~ .4 � . M• �' � . . ... _. � [ i4,��• , N � _'�rr. � � .'f , . •rf.. , !4 •� . '• T �!��r � �. ' -. . .. - u, �.�_. ��r ; y . J �, �M� f � ' •� i �� .� - A �'� � ~ _ , t��, � - - . _ � ' �,� ,. y -.' �� _�� 't �.� � .� ' ��'�:' � `}� , 7�.!a�- _. � }+ - '� _ . - �' � ��]y � • , '� y �t � k ,, ;, '�C''��10f�� ` �♦ I' .` fi� .� �, if� i-.��1 r �� ; . : I �sS��J'�' . � t �� j► !,� ' '�,r ,�� . '! � �(1. , ~ . "I� .�.� . � � , /'Y f � r �� Y - �e .T. � t � � � � � � � �� + 1. , h �� -�� ' � � � �/�, \_ ry � �/. /: • ,l;, '� �r�N�� .,� ��i � � �►' •� � . � � : r.,r• 1� ��r � , �•� •' - �� f 0 750 � �:NO 3�W� _ � � iTr.? ._�, _T ;� �� ' Y: J �� y.� :�' ^�.r �� , �' "�`.: i►!r'�"t :� � r�� i �. '� . �! • • `�� • �,��i � ' ~•-: r�� :� � � � � � : • ''� ; a FALt ' . ,�►�• 4 ,� , 1. � * ,� ` r, d . ' - , ,,. r `� I � Ir '�";d- . ,` ' � . I - ,� fi;,• : % • I r , ��F� � - '+" �,, �i '� ;� ' t .i ! '. � 1 r� i �.: . � � `�'• � Th� DspaAm�r1 d Tarmpor�tion, r �,,� �, .q� � f•� �`. .�.�► ;'�„� •� .� ` � ,�- � � • L = � �� •'.�;` � � x Avi�bn DNlsbn makea ro �werrMY� � . � ' � ' r r � Y • � a � f•` '.�; ..�, ' � ✓.: � � O � h� ^ � ' `�,' . �vd�� '~ '�.y rQpfli@ti8bOf1, Of aJ�ifl�f 0� a�1jl S • .1 jjj��` 1 1' i�'¢'�,� �. •, k� n m t or o K ♦ •�., nd rd eriar h � ,r � � � fl aP � � � � � r ��i w � � r � � .�wti -'� - � � �4 • ; �0� - N`t-y �,�'�j �.•��• t.� .�' ,�� ,�, �� . mtarmetbnprovidsdt�reln Y:l�. , ' +5 �� ! > ..�f i�:. f `' r� 'j , ' 1' � j'' • •,� ,� � • `r ,. � . � '� ��^. � � .�+,Z; . N. �' , ; "• � '�'t , . • �, • � Pro�cled Coardhete Syst�m' . � �,�. ` : r,� 'y 7�`�/�' ° {� ' � • `"'' a: - . ' �� ,' � � ` ; +. _ • � -f • ` ` NAD 1983 WIRN 9telePlans � r • � •• � _ ; � 9' ��», �° • • � V1��hnpbn Sautf� FlPS 4602 .. / . �i. �t;� �. �f. � i� �, _ • ...``1r �'; '�`.,' �X�' Pro�clart lambrrt ,� � • � `'• '� ' " +'' f''� . w- � -I� . , �ti �.: � �,. ' _i �"' �, �',: y •� '��; _ '.�'�� .,� � •TM �,� �f� r ` '�' �•~^+�.t. •• :� •� "-• �w' .� COf�01fiifl �.'CfliC :`� 'r � � .' i i Yj, �. I i / '�... ��j;' +�,, �� - .�` (;,��.? . `�. '•'�► ', •� /� � L 1�y' �y�,,�' ' , `.� ~- GeebdbyCerterTimmortn�n !� � ~ ` 1 '. � ` ' '_�. ' � �C ?��!' ��+ i� Q! '�"I� : ..'�L�.s.._ ._L._':id.a� . �_ �n,' .,.:.s�- -• _ ~�� ,._ .-� i �� .� J. li�../�J�:�1�4,.._ti ^.� 5 kane Internationai Ai �' F ' ( `�' rt �dUS1�E1S ►AQK ArD iEtTS FiFtt. p000►Veu�hpo�t O�ive. Su+tc 1�3-7 Spoksnc,�'/ashh+qlon 9912•t (5091455-6455 spokaneairyorts.net The Honorable Rich Munso�� Mayor, City of Spokane Va I��.: ;- 11707 E. Sprague Ave Spokane Valley, WA 99206 3 April 20O _ � Subject: Spokane Airpo�ts Input to Compatible Land Use Decision Dear Mayor Munson and City Council Members: This letter serves to provide additional input to the previous information provided to your staff as well as your previous meeting packets. We sincerely appreciate your efforts to address compatible land uses around Felts Field and realize the complexity of your defiberations. I heartily encourage review of all of the information previously provided as well as the attached single page. The airport wifl be represented a1 the scheduled third reading on 14 April and we do wish to make a statement should it be permitted. The Airport Board and Airport management take very seriously the responsibility to advise you on the ramifications of any decision. May I reiterate that we most respectfully request your consideration of the information provided and stand prepared to assist in any manner desired. Thank you once again for the oppo�tunity to comment. If we can be o� assistance prior to the scheduled third reading, please do not hesitatE ��: either Mr. Mark Jucht at 509 455 6462 or Mr. Todd Woodard at 509 45:� ��=�i . Sincerely, � -- - Neal Sealocf� Airr t �;�,, -�f._; Cc Cilty t..CiU{ Ji;�i �'��i�i I1��::; l.,:11 j� Ui J��Gf.c�I`1t; �.�`��il�::,v' Mr. David Mercier, City Manager City of Spok��; �'all�y Mr. Mike Ormsby� General Counsel� Spokane Airport Bozr�i Mr. John Shambaugh, WSDOT AV Mr. Ryan Sheehan, Operations Manager, ��ok�ne Airport� �.�s I;�ren «encial!, Assi�t� nt Pl::nn�r Spokane Airports and Our Commuriity Spokane's airports are critical to our community for providing services including business travel, tourism, emergency response, fire suppression, and law enforcement. They are also unique catalysts to economic development. Airports, airlines, and businesses that support our airports provide direct and indirect jobs and income throughout the state, our region and the world. These essential public assets provide tangible and intangible benefits, such as quality of life and enhanced mobility. One of the greatest concerns facin� airports today is the continued pressure brought about by inappropriate and incompatible land use that threatens and limits the operations of an airport. This is often referred to as "encroachment." Our collective public responsibility is to ensure that Spokane has a sustainable airport system. We are exceedingly fortunate that our predecessors established areas sufficient to the current and fut�ire needs of our community and the region for aviation services. Individually, many incompatible land use decisions may appear to have a negligible impact, but collectivefy, and over time, poor land use decisions can lead to the restriction of airport activity, significant increase in costs, and in some cases, causing an airport closure. This not only impacts on that airport b��t also erodes the aviation systerl� �s a whole. Tl�e Fecier�al yovernment, the State of Wast�ington and our local governments have put substantial public investment in Spokane's aviation system, and we, as stewards of the system need to protect that investmeni. STA7E REQUIREMCNTS; �� nirports are Essential Public Facilities (RCW 36.70A.2G0) �� Airporis �re part of the multi-n�adal transportation system (RCW 3�. 70l�. 070) � Towns, cities and counties must discourage incompatible land uses (RCW 36. 70.547, 36.70A.590; 35A.63.270; 35.60.250) � Towns, cities and counties must consult with aviation inte��ests (RCW 36.70.597, 36.70A.5�0; 35A.63.270; 35.60.250J � WSDOT Aviation must provide technical assistance (RCW 36. 70.547, 36. 70A.510; 35/l. G3. 270; 35. 60. 250) CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: April 14, 2009 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business � new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 09-007 relating to exercise of eminent domain authority for Havana Road Bridge. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 39.34, RCW 35A.21.160, RCW 35.22.280(7), RCW 35.22.280(6), RCW 8.12 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Study session March 31, 2009; First reading of the ordinance April 7, 2009. BACKGROUND: The City of Spokane is proceeding with the Havana Street Bridge Project. The City of Spokane Valley borders but does not include Havana Street. Because of the design requirements, the project requires additional p�ivate property adjacent to Havana and located within the City of Spokane Valley. Consequently the City of Spokane has asked that we allow the City of Spokane to act as our agents in proceeding with a condemnation action using our Eminent Domain powers. All costs will be paid by the City of Spokane. Attached is the Interlocal Agreement setting forth the terms of this agreement and the Ordinance. Notice of this action has been provided to the property owners and they are currently in discussions with the City of Spokane. Notice has also been provided to the County who owns a portion of Havana and are involved in the project as well. OPTIONS: Request changes to the proposed ordinance; adopt the proposed ordinance as drafted. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to adopt ordinance 09-007 providing for the acquisition by eminent domain of certain lands necessary in connection with the Havana Street Bridge Project. BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS: No fiscal impact to Spokane Valley. STAFF CONTACT: Michael F. Connelly, City Attorney ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance 09-007 relating to exercise of eminent domain authority for Havana Road Bridge. DRAFT C(TY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 09-007 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PROVIDING FOR THE ACQUIStTION BY EMINENT DOMAIN OF CERTAIN LANDS NECESSARY TO BE ACQUIRED FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES IN CONNECTION WITH THE HAVANA STREET BRIDGE PROJECT, LOCATED IN THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, COUNTY OF SPOKANE, STATE OF WASHINGTON. RECITALS WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley, Washington (the "City") is a code city duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the constitution and laws of the State of Washington. WHEREAS, the laws of the State of Washington (RCW 35A.21.160) provide that the City possesses all of the powers which any city of any class may have; and WHEREAS, the laws of the State of Washington, RCW 35.22.280(7} provide that the City may establish, open, after, widen, extend, and otherwise improve streets, alleys, avenues, sidewalks, and other public property in order to promote the best interest of the City. WHEREAS, the Constitution of the State of Washington, Article I Section 16 and the laws of the State of Washington RCW 35.22.280(6) allow the City to purchase or appropriate private property for public use upon making just compensation to the owners pursuant to RCW Chapter 8.12. WHEREAS, the City has determined that it is in the City's best interest to cooperate with and facilitate the City of Spokane's completion of the Havana SVeet Overpass Project, as set forth in City of Spokane Public Works file number 2004062. WHEREAS, the property iden6fied in Exhibit "A" is necessary to complete the Project. WHEREAS, the City of Spokane has represented that it has negotiated in good �aith for the acquisition of the property identfied in Exhibit A, but the pa�ties are unable to agree upon the purchase price_ WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 8.25.290, notice has been mailed to each and every property owner of records, as indicated on the tax rolls of Spokane County according to such addresses shown on such rolls, at least fifteen (15) days prior to the City Council taking final action on this ordinance, including publication of notice of this ordinance in the Spokesman Review and the Spokane Valley News Herald for two (2) consecutive weeks before final action by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, The City of Spokane Valley does ordain: Section 1. Public use and necessity requires the City of Spokane Valley to acquire the land and property, and interests therein, as described in Exhibits "A" and "B", together with such additional temporary construction easements as are deemed necessary by the City of Spokane, for public purposes in order to complete the Havana Street Bridge Project, including utilities and related improvements, all as set forth in City of Spokane Pubfic Works file number 2004062. Section 2. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Interlocal Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "C°, the City Attomey and duly appointed Special Counsel are hereby authorized and directed to commence an acction or actions in the Superior Court of Spokane County, State of Washington, in the name of the City of Spokane Valley, to acquire and take by eminent domain the lands and property interests necessary to be acquired for the purposes set forth herein, the lands and property interests Page 1 of 20 DRAFT to be so taken situate in the City of Spokane Valley, County of Spokane, all in ihe State of Washington, and more specifically described in Exhibits °A" and "B", attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, together with such amendments thereto and such additional temporary construction easements as are deemed necessary by City staff to complete the project. Section 3. The Office of the City Attorney for the City of Spokane is hereby for the purposes set forth herein appointed as special counsel to the City of Spokane Valley. Said firm shall provide all legal services in conjunction with the Office of the City Attorney for the purpose of representing the joint interests of the City of Spokane Valley and the City of Spokane as expressed in this ordinance. Section 4. That compensation for the land and property interests described in Exhibit "A" and "B" and all associated costs, expenses, damages and attomey fees shall be solely payabie by the City of Spokane from fund account number 3200-94991-95200-56102, and funds which are allocated toward the Havana Street Bridge Project by the City of Spokane Department of Construction Services, pursuant to file number 2004062. PASSED by the City of Spokane Valley City Council this day of April, 2009. Richard Munson, Mayor Attest: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved As To Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Page 2 of 20 DRAFI' Exhib'rt "A" Leqal Description of Take Hite Acquisitiou Portion of Assessor's Parcel No. 35142.9041) AU that portion of the northwest quarter of Section 14, Township 25 N., Range 4:i. E.VV.I�1., lyin� within the hereinafter described Pazcel "A" described as follow: Beginning at the intersection of the north right of way line of Broadway Avenue and the east right of way of Havana Street; said point of beginning bears N.88°12'37"E., 30.00 feet from the west section line of said Section 14 and N.O 1°59'41 "W., 30.00 feet from the West '/, corner of said Section 14; thence N.01 °59'41" W., along the east right of way line of Havana Street, 300.00 feet; thence N.88°12'3T'E., 50.00 feet; thence S.O1°59'41"E., 70.00 feet; thence S.43°06'28"W., 63.53 feet; thence S.O1°59'41"E., parallel to and 5.00 feet east of the east right of way line of Havana Street, 175.00 feet; thence 5.46°53'32"E., 14.17 feet, to the north right of way line of Broadwati� Avenue, thence S.88° 12'37"W., along said north rieht of way line. 15.00 feet to the point of beginnin�. Parcel "A" : That portion of the Suutiiw�st yuart�r of the Norttiwest quarter of Section 1�1, Township 25 North, Range 43 East, W.M., in the City of Spokane Valle}�, Spokanc Count}, Washington, described as follows: BEGINNING at the intersection of the North line of Broadway Avenue and the East line of Havana Street; Thence North 304 feet along the East line of Havana Street; Thence East 300 feet; Thence South 300 feet to the Norch line of Broadway Avenue; Thence West 300 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; (Contains 5,712 sq. ft.) E-tite Acquisition (Ponion of Assessor's Yarcel No. 35142.907i�� All that portion of the northwest quarter of Section 14, TownshiE, 2� N., Ran�e �13, F:.W.M., l}�ing within the hereinafter described Parcel "A" described as follow: Beginning on the east right of way line of Havana Street, said poinc of b�;ginning bears N.88°12'37"E., 30.00 feet; thence N.O1°59'41"W., 330.00 feet, from the West'/, corner of said Section 14; thence N.O l°59'41 "W., along said east right of way line, 60.00 feet to the northwcst corner of said parcel; thence N.88°12'37"E., along the north line of said parcel 50.00 feet; thence S.01°59'41"E., 60.00 feet, to the south line of said parcel; thence S.88°12'37"W., along said south line, 50.00 feet, ta the point of beginniny�. Parcel'�A That poction of tlie Southwest quarter of che Norchwest quarter of Section 14, Tuwnship 2a North, Range 43 East, W.M., in the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, described as follows: BEGINNIUG at the intersection oi� th� �orth li�le of E3roadwav A�enu�� and the �a;t line c►i Havana Street; Page 3 of 20 DRAFT Thence North 300 feet along said East line ta the TRUE POIN'T OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing North 60 feet along said East line; Thence East 300 feet; Thence South 60 feet; Thence West 300 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGTNNING. (Contains 3,000 sq. ft.) Page 4 of 20 DRAFT Exhibit � Legal Description of TemaorarY Construction Easement Hite Temporary Construction Easement �Portion of Assessor's Parcel No. 35142.9041) A 10 foot wide T��m�or�� Cons[n�ction Easement l��ing east of and adjacent t� th� follc��in� described parcel: All that portion of the northwest quarter of Section 14, 'I�o�mship ?� N., Ran`�e �13, E.��'.1�2., I��int� within the hereinafter described Parcel "A" described as follow�: Beginning at the intersection of the north right of way line of Broadway Avenue and t}le east right of way of Havana Street; said point of beginning bears N.88° 12'37"E., 30.00 feet from the west section line of said Section 14 and N.01°59'4l"W., 30.00 feet from the West '/, corner of saiil Sectioo 14; t6ence N.01 °59'41" W., along the east right of way line of Havana Street, 300.00 feec: thence N.88°l2'37"E., 50.00 feet; thence S.O1°59'41"E., 70.00 feet; thence 5.43°06'28"W., 63.53 feet; thence S.O l°59'4l "E., parallel to and 5.00 feet east of the east right of way 1 ine of Havana Street, 175.00 feet; thence S.46°53'32"E., 14.17 feet, to the north right of way line of Broadway Avenue, thence S.88°l2'37"W., along said north right of way line, 15.00 feet to the point of beginning. Parcel "A": That portion of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 14, Township 25 North, Range 43 East, W.M., in the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, described as follows: BEGINNING at the intersection of the North line of Broadway Avenue and the East line of Havana Street; Thence North 300 feet along the East line of Havana Street; Thence East 300 feet; Thence South 300 feet to the North line of Broadway Avenue; �I�ence Wesi 300 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; (Contains 3,236 sq. ft.) Hite Temaorary Construction Easement (Portion of Assessor's Parcel No. 35142.9078� A 10 foot wide Temporary Construction Easement east of and ad to the follo�vin�� d�,cs parcel: All that pc�rtion of'the northwest quarter of Section 14, Townsl}ip 25 N., Ran�e 43, F.1�4'.;�9., I}�ing within the hereinafter described Parcel "A" described as follo��: Beginning on the east right of way line of Havana Street, said point of beginning bears N.88° 12'37"E., 30.00 feet; thence N.O l°59'41"W., 330.00 feet, from the West '/. corner of said Section 14; thence N.O1°59'41"W., along said east right of way line, 60.00 feet to the northwest corner of said parcel; thence N.88°12'37"E., along the north line of said parcel 50.00 feet; thence S.O1°59'4l"E., 60.00 feet, to the south line of said parcel; thence S.88° 12'37"W., along said soutk� line, 50.00 feet, to the point of beginning. And the north 10 feet of the west 175.22 feet, except the ��est 54 feet of the hereinafter described parcel "A" . Page 5 of 20 llRAFT Parcel `'A'': That portion of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 14, `Township 25 North, Range 43 East, W.M., in the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, described as follows: BEGINNING at the intersection of the Nor1h line of Broadway Avenue and the East line of Havana Street; Thence North 300 feet along said East line to the TRIJF, POINT OF BEGTNNTivTG; Thence continuing North 60 feet along said East line; Thence Fast 300 feet; Thence South 60 feet; Thence West 300 feet to the Z'RUE POINT OF I3EGINNING. (Contains 1,723 sq. ft.) Page 6 of 20 DKAFT Exhibit ��LI Interlocai A9reement Return to: City of Spokane Attn: Clerk 808 W Spokane Falls Bivd Spokane, WA 99201 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SPOKANE AND THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY REGARDING ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY BY EMINENT DOMAIN FOR THE HAVANA STREET BRIDGE PROJECT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the City of Spokane, a Washington municipal corporation, and the City of Spokane Valley, a Washington municipal corporation, jointly hereinafter referred to as the "parties." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City of Spokane is a first class charter city duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the constitution and laws of the State of Washington, and the Charter of the City; and WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley is a code city duiy organized and existing under and by virtue of the constitution and laws of the State of Washington; and WHEREAS, the laws of the State of Washington (RCW 35.22.280(7)) provide that the City of Spokane may establish, open, alter, widen, extend, and otherwise improve streets, alleys, avenues, sidewalks, and other public property in order to promote the best interest of the City; and WHEREAS, the laws of the State of Washington (RCW 35A.21.160) provide that the City of Spokane Vafley possesses all of the powers which any city of any class may have; and Page 7 of 20 DRAFT WHEREAS, the Constitution of the State of Washington, Article I Section 16 and the laws of the State of Washington allow cities to purchase or appropriate private property for public use upon making just compensation to the owners pursuant to Chapter 8.12 RCW; and WHEREAS, RCW 8.12.030 authoriies cities to condemn land and property for streets and bridges within the limits of such cities; and WHEREAS, the parties have determined that it is in the best interests of both cities to construct the Havana Street Bridge Project, as set forth in the City of Spokane Public Works File Number 2004062 (hereinafter the "Project"}; and WHEREAS, the property described in this Agreement is necessary to complete the Project; and WHEREAS, said property which is necessary to complete the Project is located within the corporate limits of the City of Spokane Valley; and WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley has agreed to assist the City of Spokane in acquiring such property according to the terms of this Agreement; and WHEREAS, Havana Street forms the corporate boundary between the City of Spokane and the City of Spokane Valley, but in places the eastem haff of Havana Street remains unincorporated and under the care and responsibility of Spokane County; and WHEREAS, the City of Spokane is engaged in discussions with Spokane County that will result in the revision of the City of Spokane's corporate boundary to coincide with the eastem edge of Havana Street so as to fully include Havana Street within the corporate limits of the City of Spokane at all places where Havana Street lies on the City of Spokane's eastem corporate limits; and WHEREAS, Chapter 39.34 RCW authorizes parties to enter into agreements for joint or cooperative action to exercise any power or powers, priviteges, or authority exercised or capable of exercise by either of the parties; and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 8.25.290, notice has been mailed to each and every property owner of records, as indicated on the tax rolls of Spokane County according to such addresses shown on such rolls, at least fifteen (15) days prior to the City Council taking final action on this Agreement and related ordinance, including publication of notice of the ordinance in the Spokesman Review and Spokane Valley News Herald for two (2) consecutive weeks before final action by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the facts and recitals set forth hereinabove, which are adopted herein and made a part of this Agreement and which the parties mutually agree constitute good and adequate consideration for the obligations of the parties set forth herein, the pa�ties hereby agree as follows: Page 8 of 20 DRAFT SECTION N0.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth certain agreements between the City of Spokane and the City of Spokane Valley relating to acquisition of privately owned land and property by eminent domain as is necessary for construction of the Project. SECTION NO. 2 : APPLICABILITY OF THIS AGREEMENT The parties agree that the provisions of this Agreement shall apply to the land and property described in the ordinance attached hereto as Exhibit "A" ("Eminent Domain Ordinance"). SECTION NO. 3 : ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY BY EMINENT DOMAIN Upon final action or legislative approval of the Eminent Domain Ordinance by the City of Spokane Valley, the Office of City Attomey for the City of Spokane may commence an action or actions in the Superior Court of Spokane County, State of Washington, in the name of the City of Spokane Valley, to acquire and take by eminent domain the lands and property interests described in the Eminent Domain Ordinance (the uProperty"), the parties having found that the Property described therein is necessary for the Project. The title to the Property shall vest in the City of Spokane Valley for public street purposes and all uses incidental thereto, subject to such rights as the City of Spokane determines are necessary, in �ts sole discretion, for constructing the Project, maintaining the subsequentty improved public right-of-way, and enforcement of traffic-related laws and regulations. SECTION NO. 4 : RELOCATION ASSISTANCE Relocation assistance shall be made available to eligible owners and tenants of the Property. Responsibility for any such costs shall be borne by the City of Spokane as set forth in Section No. 5 below. SECTION NO. 5 : RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACQUISITION COSTS ln recognition that the City of Spokane has assumed responsibility for construction of the Project and that acquisition of the Property is necessary for the Project, as befinreen the parties, the City of Spokane shall be responsible and hereby agrees to pay all Acquisition Costs relating to the Property, as the term Acquisition Costs is defined in this section. For purposes of this Agreement, Acquisition Costs means any and a11 costs pertaining to efforts to acquire and acquisition of the Property. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, such costs may include: (a) amounts payable as part of any voluntary agreement and/or settlement relating to acquisition of the Property; (b) amounts awarded by a cou�ury to the owner(s) of the Property as just compensation following trial, including any attomeys fees and costs awarded by the cou�t to the owner(s) and/or their attomeys; (c) amounts paid to the owner(s) of the Property and/or their attomeys as attomeys fees and costs upon discontinuance andlor abandonment of efforts to acquire Page 9 of 20 DR4FT the Property by eminent domain; (d) any relocation assistance paid to such owner(s) or seller(s), whether or not required under Chapter 8.26 RCW; and (e) costs of necessary appraisais and title insurance to acquire the Property. SECTION NO. 6 INDEMNITY The City of Spokane shall defend, indemnify and hold the City of Spokane Valley, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits including attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the performance of this agreement, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City of Spokane Valley. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the City of Spokane and its o�cers, officials, employees, and volunteers, and the City of Spokane Valley, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, the City of Spokane's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the City of Spokane's negligence, or that of its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. SECTION NO. 7 : CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION The parties acknowledge that they, with the support of counsel, appraisers, and other consultants, are engaging in a cooperative venture for their joint benefit. In furtherance of this cooperative venture and the parties' common interests in obtaining the Property, the parties and their respective legal counsel agree to share information relating to such efforts. Such exchanges and disclosures will be for the exclusive purpose of facilitating the parties' common interests in the acquisition of the Property and will not diminish in any way the confidentiality of the materials exchanged, nor will this exchange constitute a waiver of any of the parties' attomey-client or work product privileges. To the extent allowed by law, and consistent with the parties' respective obligations under the Public Records Act, Chapter 42.56 RCW, the parties each agree to preserve and protect the confidentiality of all financial, valuation, and other proprietary information that they may obtain, and to create and preserve any applicable attorney/client and litigation work product privileges, and public record disclosure exemptions, in compliance with applicable State law. SECTION NO. 8 : CONTROL OF PROJECT Although the parties may consult and assist the City of Spokane with the acquisition of the Property and the Project, the City of Spokane shall retain final decision making authority and discretion regarding such acquisition and the completion of the Project. The City of Spokane shall pay the costs and expenses to be incurred in connection with the construction of the Project. SECTION NO. 9 : ADMINISTRATION Page 10 of 20 nkA�r The City of Spokane hereby designates its City Attorney as its representative for the purpose of implementing this Agreement. The City of Spokane Valley hereby designates its City Attomey as its representative for the purpose of implemenfing this Agreement. SECTION NO. 10 : TERMtNATION This Agreement may be terminated at any time by mutual written consent of the City of Spokane and the City of Spokane Valley. SECTION NO. 11 DEFAULT It shall be an "Event of Default" under this Agreement if either of the parties to perform, observe, or comply with the covenants, agreements, or conditions on its part contained in this Agreement, where that failure continues for a period of fifteen (15) days after written notice from the non-defaufting party. SECTION NO. 12 REMEDIES In the event of any Event of Default, the non-defaulting party may at any time, without waiving or limi�ing any other right or remedy, pursue any remedy allowed by law including, by way of example and without limitation, specific performance, declaratory judgment, and other equitable remedies, and recovery of attorney's fees and other costs for such enforcement action. SECTION NO. 13 NOTICE All notices shall be in writing and served on any of the PARTIES either personally or by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the persons below designated as contact persons. Notices sent by certified mail shall be deemed senred when deposited in the United State mail, postage prepaid. CITY OF SPOKANE: City Attorney 808 West Spokane Falls Blvd Spokane� Washington 99201 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY: City Attorney 11707 E Sprague, Room 103 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 SECTION NO. 14 : AGREEMENT TO BE FILED The City of Spokane shall file this Agreement with its City Clerk and with the County Auditor. The City of Spokane Valley shall file this Agreement with its City Clerk. SECTION NO. 15 : COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS Page 11 of 20 DRAFT The parties shall observe all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations in conjunction with meeting their respective obligations under the terms of this Agreement. SECTION NO. 16 : VENUE STIPULATION The laws of the State of Washington shall be applicable to the construction and enforcement of this Agreement. Any action at law, suit in equity or judicial proceeding regarding this Agreement shall be instituted only in courts of competent jurisdiction within Spokane County, Washington. SECTION NO. 17 : MODIFICATION No modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be valid until the same is reduced to writing and executed with the same formalities as this present Agreement. SECTION NO. 18: WAIVER No officer, employee, agent or otherwise of any party has the power, right or authority to waive any of the conditions or provisions of this Agreement. No waiver of any breach of this Agreement shall be held to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach. All remedies afforded in this Agreement or at law shall be taken and construed as cumulative, that is, in addition to every other remedy provided herein or by law. SECTION NO. 19: ALL WRITINGS CONTAINED HEREIN This Agreement contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. No other understandings, oral or othervvise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement shall be deemed to exist or to bind the parties. The parties have read and understand all of this Agreement, and now state that no representation, promise or agreement not expressed in this Agreement has been made to induce any of them to execute it. SECTION NO. 20: HEADINGS The section headings in this Agreement have been inse�ted solely for the purpose of convenience and ready reference. In no way do they purport to, and shall not be deemed to, define, limit or extend the scope or intent of the sections to which they pertain. SECTION NO. 21: SEVERABILITY In the event any portion of this Agreement should become invalid, or otherwise unenforceable, the rest of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION NO. 22 : BINDING EFFECT Both parties warrant that they have the full power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement and to perform their respective obligations under this Agreement. This Page 12 of 20 DRAF"i' Agreement constitutes a valid and legally binding obligation of both parties and is enforceable in accordance with its provisions. SECTION NO. 23 : TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE Time is of the essence of this Agreement. SECTION NO. 24 : RCW 39.34 REQUIRED CLAUSES. A. PURPOSE. See Section No 1 above. B. DURATION. See Section No. 10 above. C. ORGANIZATION OF SEPARATE ENTITY AND ITS POWERS. See Section No. 9 above. No separate legal entity is necessary in conjunction with this Agreement. D. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES. See provisions above. E. AGREEMENT TO BE FILED. See Section No. 14 above. F. FINANCING. See Section No. 5 above. G. TERMINATION. See Section No. 10 above. H. PROPERTY UPON TERMINATION. See Section No. 3. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES have caused this Agreement to be executed on date and year opposite their respective signatures. DATED: CITY OF SPOKANE Page 13 of 20 DRA �I' By: its: Attest: Approved as to form: City Clerk Assistant City Attorney DATED: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY By: Its: Attest: Approved as to form: City Clerk City Attorney Page 14 of 20 DRAFT Exhibit A AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ACQUISITION BY EMINENT DOMAIN OF CERTAIN LANDS NECESSARY TO BE ACQUIRED FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES IN CONNECTION WITH THE HAVANA STREET BRIDGE PROJECT, LOCATED IN THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, COUNTY OF SPOKANE, STATE OF WASHINGTON RECITALS WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley, Washington (the °City") is a code city duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the constitution and laws of the State of Washington. WHEREAS, the laws of the State of Washington (RCW 35A.21.160) provide that the City possesses all of the powers which any city of any class may have; and WHEREAS, the laws of the State of Washington, RCW 35.22.280(7) provide that the City may establish, open, after, widen, extend, and otherwise improve streets, alley, avenues, sidewalks, and other public property in order to promote the best interest of the City. WHEREAS, the Constitution of the State of Washington, Article I Section 16 and the laws of the State of Washington RCW 35.22.280(6) allow the City to purchase or appropriate private property for public use upon making just compensation to the owners pursuant to RCW Chapter 8.12. WHEREAS, the City has determined that it is in the City's best interest to cooperate with and facilitate the City of Spokane's completion of the Havana Street Overpass Project, as set forth in City of Spokane Public Works file number 2004082. WHEREAS, the property identified in Exhibit "A" is necessary to complete the Project. WHEREAS, the Ci1y of Spokane has represented that it has negotiated in good faith for the acquisition of the property identified in Exhibit A, but the parties are unable to agree upon the purchase price. WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 8.25.290, notice has been mailed to each and every property owner of records, as indicated on the tax rolls of Spokane County according to such addresses shown on such rolls, at least frfteen (15) days prior to the City Council taking final action on this ordinance, including publication of notice of this ordinance in the Spokesman Review the Spokane Valley News Herald for two (2) consecutive weeks before final action by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, The City of Spokane Valley does ordain: Section 1. Public use and necess'rty requires the City of Spokane Valley to acquire the land and property, and interests therein, as described in Exhibits "A" and "B", together with such addi6onal temporary construction easements as are deemed necessary the City of Spokane, for public purposes in order to complete the Havana Street Bridge Project, including utilities and related improvements, all as set forth in City of Spokane Public Works file number 2004062. Section 2. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Interlocal Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "C", the City Attorney and duly appointed Special Counsel are hereby authorized and directed to commence an action or actions in the Superior Court of Spokane County, State of Washington, in the name of the City of Spokane Valley, to acquire and take by eminent domain the lands and property interests necessary to be acquired for the purposes set forth herein, the lands and property interests to be so taken situate in the City of Spokane Valley, County of Spokane, all in the State of Washington, and more spec�cally described in Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, Page 15 of 20 DItA F'i' together with such amendments thereto and such additional temporary construction easements as are deemed necessary by City staff to complete the project. Sec6on 3. The Office of the City Attorney for the City of Spokane is hereby for the purposes set forth herein appointed as special counsel to the City of Spokane Valiey. Said firm shall provide all legai senrices in conjunction with the Office of the City Attomey for the purpose of representing the joint interests of the City of Spokane Valley and the City of Spokane as expressed in this ordinance. Section 4. That compensation for the land and property interests described in Exhibit "A" and "B" and all associated costs, expenses, damages and attomey fees shall be solely payable by the City of Spokane from fund account number 3200-94991-95200-56102, and funds which are allocated toward the Havana Street Bridge Project by the City of Spokane Department of Construction Services, pursuant to file number 2004062. PASSED by the City of Spokane Valley City Council this day of , 2009. MAYOR Attest: City Clerk Page 16 of 20 DRA FT Exhibit "A" Leqal Description of Take Hite Acquisition (Portion of Asses�or's Patcel No. 35142.9041) All that portion of the northwest quarter of Section 14, Township 2� N., Ran��e 43, F.W.1�R., lying within the hereinafter described Pazcel "A" described as follow: Beginning at the intersection of the north right of way line of Broad�vay Avenue and the east right of way of Havana Street; said point of beginning bears N.88°12'37"E., 30.00 feet from the west section line of said Section 14 and N.O 1°59'41 "W., 30.00 feet from the West '/. corner of said Section 14; thence N.O1°59'4l" W., along the east right of way line of Havana Street, 300.00 feet: thence N.88° 12'37"E., 50.00 feet; thence S.O 1°S9'41"E., 70.00 feet; thence 5.43°06'28"W., 63.53 feet; thence S.O 1°59'41 "E., parallel to and 5.00 feet east of the east right of way line of Havana Street, 175.00 feet; thence S.46°53'32"E., 14.17 feet, to the ❑orth right of way line of Broadwa� Aveaue, thence S.88°12'37"W., along said north right of way line, 15.00 feei to the point oi beginning. Parcel "A": That portion of the Southwest quarter uf the Narthwest quarter of Section 14, Township 25 North, Range 43 East, W.M., in the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, described as follows: BEGINNING at the intersection of the North line of Broad�va�� Avenue and the F'ast line ��f Havana Street; Thence North 300 feet along the East line of Havana Street; Thence East 300 feet; Thence South 300 feet to the Narth line of Broadway Avent�L: Thence West 300 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; (Contains 5,712 sq. ft.) Hite Acguisition (Portion of Assessor's Parcel No. 35142.9078� All that partion of the northwest quarter of Section 14, Township 25 N., Range 43, E.1�V.M., lying �vithin the hereinafter described Parcel "A" described as follo��•: f3eginning on the cast right of way line of Havana Street, said point of beginning bears N.88° l2'37"E., 30.00 feet; thence N.O 1°59'41 "W., 330.00 feet, from the West '/. corner of said Section 14; thence N.O 1°59'41"W., along said east right of way line, 60.00 feet to the northwest corner of said parcel; thence N.88°12'37"E., along the north line of said parcel 50.00 feet; thence S.OI°59'41"E., 60.00 feet, to the south line of said parcel; thence S.88°l2'3�"W., along said south line, 50.00 feet, to tlie point of beginnin�. Parcel "A": That portion of the Souchwest quarter of the tiorthwest yuarter of Section 14, Township 2� I�urth, Range 43 East, W.M., in the City of Spol:ane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, described as follows: BEGINNING at the iilt�rsection of the North line of Br��id�va�• Avenue anci the East line of Havana Street; Page 17 of 20 DRAFT Thence North 300 feet along said East line to the TRUE POI?�'T OF QEGTNNING; The�ce continuing Norch 60 feet along said East line; Thence East 300 feet; Thence South 60 feet; Thence West 300 feet to the TRUE PO1NT OF BEGINNING. (Contains 3,000 sc�. ft.) Page 18 of 20 DRAFT Exhibit u B�� LeQal Description of Temporary Construction Easement Hite Temporary Construction Easement �Portion of Assessor's Parcel No. 35142.9041� A 10 foot wide Temporary Construction F,asement lying east of and adjacent to the following described parcel: All that portion of thc northwest quarter of Section 14, `Township 2� N., Ranee 4�, E..VI'.1�1., lying within the hereinat�er described Parcel "A" described as follow: Eieginning at the intersection of the north right of way line of Broadway Avenue and the east right of way of Havana Street; said point of beginning bears N.88°12'37"E., 34.00 feet from the west section line of said Section 14 and N.O 1°59'41 "W., 30.00 feet from the West '/. corner of said Section 14; thence N.O l°59'41" W., along the east right of way line of Havana Street, 300.00 feet; thence N.88° 12'37"E., 50.00 feet; thence S.O 1°59'41 "E., 70.00 feet; thence S.43°06'28"W., 63.53 feet; thence S.01°59'41"E., parallel to and 5.00 feet east of the east right of way line of Havarza Street, 175.00 feet; thence S.46°53'32"E., 14.17 feet, to ttie north right of way line of Broadway Avenue, thence S.88°12'37"W., along said north right of way line, 15.00 feet to the �oint of beginning. Parcel "A'': That portion of tlie South�vest quarter of the Nurth«�cst quarter of Section 14, Township 25 North, Range 43 East, W.M., in the City of Spokane Valley�, Spokanc Cc�unty, Washington, described as follows: BEGINNTNG at tlie uitersection of the I�'arth line of Broad�i�av f1��enue and the f:ast lin�� oF Havana Street; Thence North 300 feet along the I�ast line of 1-lavana Street; Thence East 300 feet; Thence South 300 feet to the North line of Broad�vay t1��enue; Th�nce West 300 feet to the POINT OF BEGINN(NG; (Contains 3,23G sq. ft. j Hite Temporary Construction Lasement_(Portion of Assessor's Yarcel No. 3� 1-12.9078� A 10 foot wide "I'emporary Construction Easement east of and adjaccnt tc� tlic: foll��in� ci�scribed parcel: All that portion of the nortll«�est quarter of Section 14, T��nship 2� N., Ran�e 4�, i:.�4'.tit., I��in� within the hereinafter described Parcel "A" described as follow: Beginning on the east right of way line of Havana Street, said point of beginning bears N.88° 12'37"E., 30.00 feet; thence N.O 1°59'41 "W., 330.00 feet, from the West '/. corner of said Section 14; tfience N.O 1°59'41 "W., along said east right of way line, 60.00 feet to the northwest corner of said parcel; thence N.88° 12'37"E., along the north line of said parcel 50.00 feet; thence S.OI°59'41"E., 60.00 feet, to the south line of said parcel; thence 5.88°l2'37"W., along said south line, 50.00 feet, to the point of beginning. And the north 10 feet of the west 175.22 feet, except the west 50 feet of thc hereinafter described parcel "A''. Page 19 of 20 DRA F'I' Parcel "A": That portion of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 14, 'i'ownship 25 North, Range 43 East, �L'.M., in the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, described as follows: BEGIiVNING at the intersection of thc North line of Broadway Avenue and the East line of Havana Street; Thence North 300 feet along said East line to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing North 60 feet along said East line; Thence East 300 feet; Thence South 60 feet; Thence West 300 feet to the 1'RUE POINT OF BFGINNING. (Contains 1,723 sq. ft.) Page 20 of 20 Bridging the Valiey � �a-�a-G-�ade--Separ-atian , . �. ,, , � . ' .� `�r j , • � ti . t q . `� ,��A�K�" • , t • ✓ ' j' : • i � ; •; 1.•�� ; , ' _ • � ; °i � � y ,�, �_�: " j �± '` i ,>; y ^ ,'} � r , r '' ._ � "�,.,,, Y. +� � 1, �.,�� . � . � • ' � • . �', . �, � �' ''� ,,' �,, • ��. �: �♦!"�.�� ,2; 1 '"` ' �� `A-t ``t y �� .�•� �' "' 7 � �� .' �1��,'r tr,ltyS� +,��t 1•rf, t� �� Y � . �+ �; r �s' �' !s. t -�,��, `�_. ��`.:' - _;r.,' ��'� ��f � .� ,•� :�� f ��..:� � - t "��'. �Z►� �y ; � . _i� � � � �.L �� . . �.1, ..` }� , � . ��k i �� +� `�� T L . ' . �• i " ,. S Y� l � f � �i; •� j aR� �„ �•f :Y „� r \ ' � r ,> ,� v S '��`�S � �� >r y 1� ,� T� � ,� 1� . ,�'�a�`�S ••.,=��•�;� ,� �. • � ,. , . . �:. . .�'r� •, �i' � t��+, � 1 , . "' . . , ,� � � , � ` . r � , . �� .l � y � � ; � M . �, , . . , �� '!'�. Zr .1: ��4(£� '� i x i7l' � �•'.�� , �.�..y!� i� �. " h.� i � � . . • ` � ;. "'�'= ''`�.1.. � =n f � b •� � l � } , �'. r . ' � . ��,�n� � � �l'1 • y y�3{�'r', ��}�` r ^I . S �/ f . � - � +f T � i��,��' • • � •� � .. � . '�y.�.{ `11�,� ,��•• f '� . . ' ,��-� ��, . r.�t�t� ? ti.f � 4 `��' � � - . . �' , ,. '!`�� „ �. , ��',�' ' y,s P �� , �1.� •��. . \� M�: � �' . J � ' ,.+��'., } ',• . .. � .r ^�;:... �t.. �: �,`.`,� �`. �`,,' �..��i�.�.�f,�lr�.+1.� l . _�.+� . r r � � I! � . ' �1�.' %'ry� :,*. ... ; ��{j,. .. . � ` ' } i "ti � � �,• .� ` i. - � / e ;��+ � f y � i � �, _ h % i ,' .� A � ' � « f �� s:Y •�� 1 ` ' i. / � �, i� v � ( �� y � _ _ _ � �/ 1� . '�� _" '_ - �, � y I � �� __�"'�� J �!% '��._-_ _ I '� `� .'7 �� '/ % L� `� f, I ' ` ��;�� • f t� ��j � . � i�i . � � _ � � . I . . �� - _..- � +.r., ' i f'" i � r[� ,� y'j'� �' � �' � �� .� .� ��. .� '�'� � i �� ! •,. � � I J' ��'�1. I •'� � d � • I I � � � , ��f�� ..ii � } y. 1 r;' �f� ' t� t;i 'l� -�'•• ,. wr � j . � . I � � ' � ' � �. � ' ', n, � i � �+ � f � r � �X r�' ��f �Y '.f , .. lr.i � , - r . t . i. �i li' ' � I, � � ,� 11 : �) I -� � �� . �� j ,( � �-, 1 \ I j , :G,�l��f . r �� r ��' � ' ' . �� 'lt?� "L� :A� �yi�� , '! • � I , ' i � • I r` ~ �I� `�� (_� l %,r �� 1 , • . !, .� r t ( y � � 3 �`� i � � ` ,, • I ' � I -- - � tr,i,j�G � ,:F,•�f ' +� ' � � � y I . ..- - . - - � , ' 1 /� A �. � � ��y�Aqr` � �-YI . . � � `-. _. y .. � � f� i"r'�• �,` tw ' ♦ f A�,./'�� . � }'1,.Y'�V�A'• : � ) -�. . M. .�. . . � _ � � y. �� ' '.�"I.r�':!' � r' rt��' . "'7,�'X'�MI! J �/ '�.:�I� + ^T7L''�' J�� tiaw . � '� t ' •.� - . -' �"„- .:�,�-� f�-•f�'dT' r- �" _SfYwuh�e� "�'Ci��_�y��.� , r • � � tr ,.�y � .. �. a • .�. . , s��''iA/t��.� v. � � ...'� ' 7'F"'«C1w� � r � — � ��'vi:F!' -' � �,�: �'R' ,�i"r' � ' • " r::� - T��. ' s+1�C _ �� v+ • : u , r , : .t�'�'J'��.•.'. � . : "�µ�1r�"" ' .w � _ �T!"4, � r ,•;��:;y; �'+i��,. ' h .�. , w� ;�' ✓`� � �T'Y�1��1��'�I:� ''...', ^� y� � � . �. ;ru � '* � q � I+r' � ' � . - " - ".','-'� r�lK � i 7: }i _ : .y „� ..-..I�^" , , ` _ ; ., ,., � w � , � ��1�� .. • �� . •� .A�. . �v, ,� � �r`,� • �{l�;c+=.i�'� - .��+�. . . . � . ... . .n.v . , - , . . . , . .. O C/ w�•i :.� . .,�_ V� . •,.,v1�•. 1 .�-7:.�"��"r`%"�ti�Lw�� `�,so...laR� s:w�: _..p •`r t �,,., �' ��{�9lai�Lrt �•-.;� �, n . �+aw � _ ca'!'r'��...• . �.: "-' �. . � . � : ' � ..y,� ..-. • ' . i.� - - •Y ` �. �. . - . .. . re ��minary - u �ec o ange � October 11, 2006 � _i�_ *..:�. ��.�.,. Havana Street/BNSF Se aration Project, S okane, WA P p Project Description This project will separate the grades of t�e rail line and Havana r ��' == � ` : ,, _ - Street This would be accomplished by construcang a bridge �� _' -" � --�� , . , .r, , . over the BNSF tracks and by lowering the tracks as necessary. -,� �-. �-�"�"'°" "f� �;';�� `�" � r ....�. Havana Street is a minor north-south arterial serving the r�� ' Tr .� * � � easterly portion of the City of Spokane between Hartson ? :; ` �y- .., Avenue on the south and Trent Avenue (SR 290) on the norti�� - eoa�. __.� T - � r . �r��r '. ' This arterial crosses the UPRR Vacks (and their intemal yard . � l�� t � -== .� . lines to the East Spokane Yard) as well as the BNSF inain line �� : �..�.; �-- �i ._ (and their intemal yard lines accessing the Yardley Facility). �� : � _ � .:�� <� � - � +� .r Yr . r ' � �. This arterial lies in tfie midst of a large commercial area which -- �� -� , has a heavy emphasis on freight storage and disfibution. �� - - "' . -, >.; ema�,h, � Havana Street, however, is not cumently being utilized to its ful I .. ' �� -� '�_�__ S{,okano liitur uaio potential due, in large part, to delays encountered at the two � Fairflrour�d J_ _-� } railroad crossings. This is particularty true at BNSF's crossing ' ak� - . which effectively closes Havana Street at the tracks an average � � � � � �-� � of 17 hours a day. Proposed Bridge Location Summary of Benefits � •- ==---J' Proiect Limits • Havana Street is an arterial in an important commercial area with an emphasis on freight storage and disUibution. This arterial is connected to SR-290 on the north and has access to I-90 on t�e south via 2^� and 3^� Avenues. SR-290 and I-90 are major conduits for easUwest interstate trade as well as Uade from Canada. North/south bound truck traffic on Havana Street would no longer be forced to divert along both Broadway Avenue and Trent Avenue in order to gain access to the other side of the tracks. • Trains currently go 5 m.p.h in the vicinity of the Havana Street at grade crossing. This is true for both the main line and the intemal yard traffc. This is done because of the high potentiat for accidents at this crossing. The City of Spokane would ce�tainly support increased train speeds at this location once a bridge was in place and opera�onal. • The proposed bridge would open this roadway to current demands as well as accommodate the additional traffic that is expected to grow in excess of 16�o per year as tl�e existing commercial property is redeveloped for mixed use. Construction Schedule The design of the bridge is 98% complete. The project has received NEPA approval and Right-of-Way acquisition is underway. The project is expected to out to bid in 2009. Construction (phase I) is expected to begin no later than July of 2009. Cons�vction will be a slow process due to the coordination efforts that are necessary to keep BNSF's main line operational during construction. The bridge is expected to open in late 2011. Antici ted Committed Dollars Funding Status FMSIB x �a,000,000 Funding has been identified from the Ci of S kane x $550,000 following sour�es: Washington State STP- Federal x $9,288,000 Freight Mobility Strategic Investment State TIB x $1,975,000 Board, Federal Surface Transportation S okane Transit Autho � x $1 179,000 Program, State Transportation S kane Coun x $40,000 Improvement Board, Spokane Transit 2006 Fed A ro riations x $992,000 Authority, Federal Appropriations BNSF RR x $1,022 Burlington Northem Santa Fe and ARRA Fed Funds x $1,400,000 Spokane County. Partnershi Total �20 446 248 March 2008 Update 1 �� ONE C�MPANX M e m o J�-�.J� t I 1Kany Satutioiu" —� - -� . ,3�; =;��; To: � 3:�. ;`��c1:E— c'�;t.r. I F� Hua (Tony) Wang, PTOE, HDR � Havana Street Grade Separation - Fusan LIn. PE, HDR Supplemental Traffic Analysis end . Signal Warrant Study , �� Cary Stewart, PE, HDR �, Don Sims, PE, HDR i � April, 2006 �� ►'b: 31880 . . I RE: Traffic Assumptions Memo (Draft) Introduction As part of the Havana Street Grade Separation Project, The suppfemental traffic anafysis and signal warrant analysis are needed to �eflect the labest Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) travel demand forecasted volumes. � The signfficant changes in volumes will require the entire iraffic artalysis to be re-evaluated for intersedion c,�annel¢ation recrommendation. In addition, a signaf warrant study.will be reyuired at the Trent Avenue and Havana Street intersection. This traffic assump�on memo document significant assUmptions and parameters for the �affic analysis and the signal warrant siudy. Assumptions for the Scope of Tra�ic Analysis • P.M. peak hour analysis w�l be perfoRned for the Action scenario fwith Bridqe) for the Year of opening (2009) ; and design year (2030). . � • The Level of Service (LOS) anafysis w�ll be oonducted for the following intersection using STRC forecasted P.M. volumes for the y�ar of opening (2009) and design year (2030). LOS for 2009 and 2030 need to be 'D' or better. o Havana Street / Trent Avenue � o Havana Str�et 1 Broadway Avenue o Havana Strest 1 Mission Avenue o Mission Avenue 1 Trent Avenue • The intersecbon channeltza�on will be reoommended based on STRC for�casted P.M. volumes and engineering judgments f�r the year of opening (2009) and design year (2030). � • The Synchrv and SimTraffic wi11 be used to conduct LOS analysis and determine the queue storage lengtt�s. �. � Peak hour factors witl u�lize the 2006 values f�r all intersections except for the fntersect�n ot Havana Street 1 ' Broadway Av+en�e. The intersectbn of Havana Street / Broadway Avenue vvill use the peak hour factor obtained on 2003. - ; Assumpt�ons for the Scope of Signal Warrant Analysis • The signal warrant analysis will be conducted at the f ntersection of Trent Avenue and Havana Street f�r the year of opening (20Q9). ' • Threa out of eight warrant standar�s will be used in the analys�s due to insufficient data ar� not ava�able for ott�r warrants. The three warrant standards are the fopowiny: 0 1A Eight-Hou� Vehicular Volume: Condition A- Minimum Vehicular Vdume 1 B Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume: Condition B— Interruptbn of Conditions o Four-Nour Vehicular Volume o Peak Hour . HDR Ergineaing, lac. wo �oan �+�n�e Nor��east swe � 20o Tebpbone (�2� 453-1523 Paye � d� 6eie�ue, Wr�hinyion 98004-5548 (12� 4SO�b?DO Fnc (425) 4537i07 •wwhdrinc.00ai , � i • Conversion of peak hour volumes to Average Daily traffic Volumes (ADT) since no Average Dally Traffic '', forecast is provided by SRTC for the year of opening (2009). o Develop a local K-factor using the existing 24-fiour counts at the inters�caon of Ttent Avenue and Havana Street Assume the fubure traffic follows the same characteristia as the existing tra�ic. ; o Loca! K-factor = PM peak volumesl24 hour volumes �.093 for the intersectlon of Trent Avenue and Havana Strcet o Averaae traffic vdume = Peak hour volume I K-factor . • Comersion of average daily traffic volumes to hourly volumes for the signal wa�rant anatysis w�l be esGmated by factoring 200fi hourly volume counis by the ratio of 2009 ADT to 2006 ADT. � • Houriy northbound and southbound right tuming pericentage wi71 be the same as those provided in SRTC's P.M. ', peak hour forecast � • The software of HCS+ Warrants will be used for checking warrant 1, 2 and 3. � � Traffic Turning Movement Counts Traffic tuming movement counts vwere conducted at all intersections except for the intersecction of Havana Street and Broadway Avenue In both am. and p.m. peak periods. The data was coUec�ed on Tuesday, April 4, 2006, from 7:00 - 9:00 a.m., and 4:00 - 6:00 p.m. Feld reconnaissanve was conducted on April 4, 2006, b� record the intersection channelizations, striping, and types of traffic contrd. Traffic tuming movament counts were conducted at the intersection of Havana Street and Broadway Avenue on Tuesday, �lugust 5, 2003. The tra�ic volumes were factor�ed up according t�e traffic growth rate at t�e nearby intersection of Havana StrBet and Trent Avenue, which had both traffic tuming movement counts on April 4, 2046 and August 5 2043. The P.M. peak hour traffic growth rate was determined to be 1.02 from 2003 to 200fi. 2006 PM peak volumes are summariied In the following diagram. 2006 PM Peak Volumes without brid e .�.— 979 f-- 981 T� Ave � 2 Mission Ave � 22 � 718 —► R � 712 —♦ 10 — �I � w 443 � v� •..• w w �` 2 rent Avc 1� 1 � �— 2� 9 �— T t v �' �� I� 38! —� 19 — y � u � � � . • , � x ~'� ~ •� Za w c.� � I � � � Braadway Ave ♦ � 4 —� 360 —► � t � 16S -� N � Q �o �+ HDR EnD(nlE�I►Fg, lnc. 5001081h Av�anie l�eeil, Suie 1200 Teleplans (12� 4511b23 Pape 2 0l 4 B�Oe+e�. W�ingEon 98004-5549 (�25� 45�8200 Faz (415) 4b371Q7 wpwLdrinc.com 3 . � SRTC's Forecasted PM Peak Volumes 20Q9 PM Peak Volun�es with Brid e � � �--- 7% M Ave �r 0 Mission Ave � 21 677 ---► R � 677 —� � 133 � � � A p O� i °`;, � � 0 Trcn VC � � 1 �, '- i °3 �� ve r �� I� 633 —� 171 '�� N �' a � �NW A � g7 � ,� 423 �roa�dwav Ave 0 �. 442 —► � I � ' � -� �� 0 2030 PM Peak Volumes wlth Bridge � � 833 �. 833 Trent Ave r 0 Mission Ave �— 39 878 —► k � �8 '♦ 2S5 � � �� o ° o� o �- 0 � � � f— 394 Treat Ave Trent v � 0 —� � I � 92I --� 1S9 � ��° w � � R-.-120 � � � � S90 Broadwav Ave 21 � 513 —► � 1 � 0 — 71 �,, _ ,., . ° �o HDR Engk�ee�t�, (n� �� w� �� i200 TaNpAane (42� 453�� Pape 3 d 4, Fmc (d�5)453�Tt�97 wMw.hdrinc.00m . � I Assumptions for Traffic Control The type of traflic control at the intersection of Havana Street and Trent Avenue will depend on the signal warrant �alysis. If a signal is wamanted, an actuated signal control wal used in the Synchro analysis. This signal wip be �' coordinated with the signal at the intersecaon of Trent Avenue and Mission Avenue. If a signal is not warranted, a two- � way stop controi w81 be used in tl�e Synchro analysis. ' ' The type of �affic conirol at other intersecbons will remain the same as existing conditions for the year of opening (2009). � The signal control pian wi11 be optimized base on PM peak wlumes. ' l • pne-way stop control at the intersecaon of Havana Str�t and Mission Avenue • Ac�uat� signal control at the intersection of Trent Avenue and Mission Avenue , . • Actuated signal coMrol at the intersection of Havana Street and Broadway Avenue Major signal control parameter assumptions to simplif�r the traffic operation analysis: • Yelbw Time : 3.5 s • AI!-Red Time :1.0 s • Passage Time : 3.0 s • Stop Bar detector only • Ped WALK : 7 s • Ped Flashing DON'T WALK: based on the curb to curb width af the road way and 4fps of ped walking speed. • No tuming prohibits w�l be used at the intersection of Havana SUeet and Trent Avenue • Right Tum On Red (RTOR} at all signalized intersections using Synchro defaulf values. I � ; ) i i- ! � � , � I HDR Enginaering Ine. 5�01S�Ih aven�e ►��rthaast Su:t� 1200 Tele�hau (425)153-1523 Page 4 of 4 Babvue, Waa�nplon 98604-5549 (425� 45a6200 Fax (42� 45}71Q1 www.hdrinc cc+m . � �� r � . . � 1 �.. ,., t�_!t .g .. � IL � I y' �.tt! _ a r . � 't ' n � � � � � . � , � � � ,, • i , . � � f • ; '� �`�• , l I .� rti � ��I , �� !' •� . ' �w.r -- - ♦� � ' _ _ ' � t � ' �,~� � ` �' .�' _ `1 I �,�� ' '� F '1�' �� . � ! �' ��'F I ��.. •1 �`�V��:� ,' �� ` �1 �" _ ��y . "_ ^`- - �� , y-� � . � --- 1-- r "� �: _-_� � '��, � 1 �� • _ ._ " _ . i . . . � � 3 �s i t , � ii 3� � � • ' ..A:. ' y ° 4 , ' �� ; 1 ! '� 1 � �' .i . : � -' `:.+'�ir+� !�'' = ... :' :: ; � u � t j .,, .y ,�� + _ ; F � , - t1' . ,� T � ,` . • .�,, 1 . ---� . � ' � '` , � ; � �,' . a � �t . � ' : 1 �' r j ... �' _ ' „ ��'� � ► !' ' — � • ��, 'ii '� j �i 1 +^ : 1 . - _ `' � � � � } � '.' . � . . ' 4 � ' � _ � N � f .w :"�� - ��- • �.� � �• ' �v . ' • i ., �'. . � k � � `.� � j �� . • ��' � ..� , l'� ! ' � j � i i M �,� i � , `� {r� �).� - r ►t , ( I I � �� _ , � � �t s+`i I ' � , �� - . , � . • � � . �� . � �. � . . i • • � � � � . - I _ • ,• - V . _ � , . � � � s i � , 1 y = ''� �' � �f -r . � �� ,!f•� --� � ,1 1� � ! 1 u. ' , t� � t � � .� , vf; ' � � '_' , •�' �N ;�: ` `�� . ',, " �� , � t� i� i � _ � ; - -.., - � ' " � � � � � _ ,� � � .,t ��1�'�11 �5 � - � r �r �� ..� _:., . .� ._ __..._,_.. � 4 ��_,�,� � - , ,�! � C� r �; : ;'�� ,. � �,_�.� �. —�- ,�, � , y,5 ' ` .it 3 � ' 7 : � �� _. � '� � ti 'r'' , :� • - - �' 1' _ � � � ..;, , . 1 r �. , 1 ( ! t . .� r � � r � i ' � � � :i � ��' � . . g .� } ' � j ; . ,�� ' , . �- �� ',, ;{' � ;' . _ �_ = ,, '�.�:.. , r ` p --. � ' � '� � 1 r � . . _ . - ' y �• �� { � •�.� ' �Y� 7 �;�' f� • , ' . T;` . . . tyt 1 ' � = ' _ � - � � ! �L �j��r ��""l�� ' � �i �. �\ �.� , r '� � � . i � •. _ ��-+-� } _ _ , - �� x - ' �7. � � �' �5�� . � 1 �1 �S �. �� '� � rr ' - ti t, ��- ` ��, s r: •' , , r ,��':• �f . ) � ��: � �.� �'` - . -•'�' � ' � s i �1 , � . w � --� � . _ ♦ ._• � - , . i � ..�� '��' �' `- � ��• ��n � _. • � � �, ��' �� 1 . t •� � � � .�� 1��♦ �: 1 � � . _ �Y� ! _ . . � �. �� i ' � �� , . � . , . '{. " � I � , � `�� \. _�� J� + • ,�:��i �* �� '� � r � � • : � � � � � ; ! . � � • � ,�, Y. �� C1 � � t � - - _ ,'r1'F �. •, �� 'r .� i ` � . rr . ' r , I I "� . � ~ `_: - . , , i 0 , _� f� , ! � I � � � �,' rl ��. • � �� « � �R f 1 f i. 1 � - �j� ''�� s+ '°� • � • ^ � ` � � .� __ f N �S- � 1 "" • t'K: �- � �� i �' '` -� �� ' ' :�', � a x� ! ° � . q. . � 4 C' •� • _ ` . . a . ' 1 `..-� T ' .,, � ''. f 1 �- � -- :fs -� ?. � , � ., � `� " ��- , � ,'r �n �, :. .-. ' �--i � � � 1 �t t f ti, t� , � . �+' ��+ �.. � � - -�1. , , �s�,� � . � ` � , . . .. _� � � �. .� �' .1,-: • ` ♦ �'+f :",, � � . � . - �-.�..� � I � � � ,, � ' � � � _. s�3 — i ` • �� ' * � � ► j � � � f . � ,.i • ' ' _ - � � • M w : t ' ' �� ,�._� A ! �1 �i� � � � �,`_ � y . i � �/'i �r��_ .. �"~ . ti� ��,�- �� ' � � _ i�� "'i � �1 _ . � . � S � �y i 'r ' • - -- I � ' �y: � 5�...� � �^ :{ + , ^ � �' I � i �1 � Y - iT '.� � �' � 1 I � � 1 r, • . r . � '; �`?a'. T "'vl - . . . � .r _ � . � �M . ��,.�, ,,,}' �� t r • � � ► � �t�� „� � �' ': � 1 • ..� } . .., r`i: �� _ c .�+t - . � ,� - . __ . . ' • ..., _ _ ` t � , � , { � ' l � . � �� t . +� � � E •[�} � •�`�. ' ,� �� i ,� --t � aT1 � ' � V � t � � ' • � ? =' � � ' -�'. � ' �! ^��.1 � � j 1 �� .4. _ � . � � - i � �`�a'.. '. ^' -•'' < �.: . '� -_- � � . - - ._ - . , .r _ '� ' � T"' . . . . •� .. - . _ -, � � ti • L .., :s � - , ) " -- l t . _ � • . _.r�� . - . . - _ . 1 - ,� ' L_ _ _ _ ,. _� � - — — - ,'i_ ` _ _ _ :_��_ � ' - - - . . � s � S � �,� - -} ` SOUTH APPROACH HAYANA STREET BRIQGE NORTH APPRt1ACH —�� -- = --� - - � = — • ; - �. - - _ � - �_ . �. - � . _ . " A � - -- �o t�.l 1... ' -- '.j. ,l' -•_ .. • .1 5 r' � � . • -- - �. � . - - �� - �� . . --� . - � y � � �� ` � r � l � � , • ,� t � � � ,�+. � , ,. .�, `S , . . , a o o w - � ,, ,` ;, - ,. . � . o + ' ,,�. `HITE �CRANE � ' � �' .� '' �. �, . , � .1 ` . _ .f, �, � � ' T' � � � ' , ' i � 't � � � � �. _ �i � _ I ` , ,' %� � - �- a 1 ! � � . . 4 ; . /CJ { � � r � - t � ' ,�? � . � � J ll �'� • � � t , �r r - ' . . , - � , , � - • � r ` - , A ' ` � ! - � ' �. I. _1 � �. F . � , ? � ' } � , � � � i T ' � � I � t- '� ' "��' ; . ` � � � �+. ��-'�- � , . � � • t � +• �D � �1 � � ! 1. 1 � •� � , � � . _ � � Y '� '� - ' (d Q � � r� • � � 1� �i Y ' I �. i � r � , � , } ` f f � ~ 1 .-. � . - . J r � •, � l- ' � �� f 1 _�. .I ��: � \ \ 1 , 1� • � • � r'_� � , � rr . R � . • � ' • . `.� � � � _ _ _ t � - t ;tl 1 t �'� • 1 , ' �• `` �., ' ` t7:.� � � . >- ( l�I��1 . . � � � �. ' -� :.i.�i.� ��A' . , i '! ;. ' ,�•„� -..,, � � '° ` � � �� • �t., ' a` i `��' � n _�r `��/^� +I) �. • � � ��.'� -. . . . - - - � � - �a • • , R ., !� � � �s{�♦ t �rl.�-` #�j � � ; . � f ` �♦ . .� 1 ` .1 1 '� ' ` ` � � � i ' � � _a � . . 1 ` � .!-� ' - � �� , � � ; �,, � �,.-� _ • S 3 i r�� - p , s - „ :T � . � ��,_ \ � ,• � a , i, � ,, .- � F . I�;j�� ' •l,lJltr° =' � t 4 � -' i .�� '� ' � '•;} ' � r � S _�-... ��, " ; ` �� `�.. . - � •�� „� � S� � �. '� - �� •. , ° , "� � , �1, '• � � s i � ��!:` ;� � : '�' �,` _ , i �� • ~ 4r}M` � - � � _ • ''�'�. i � : -"-'� � ! j �` . ' � " x � �^a=},�1.�!��I� �� y.: � ' ' . r .t. i ,�' - ..��. ` � . • r ` \ y ' . . � ` 1 � ' , � � �: `, � ,� w `.�. �� ' � � r� , . • +. � �`. '� � . � t , �� 0 � , � _ �i. • '-`'� , "�r � 4 � P - � ~ �' . ( ~� � � - � f . f � - ' t ��' , 1 , . '. f ' � ,� �.`� I �' • . �1. � � � MN `4' . I t r: � ` �� 'y� • � •' • . � ',• �! I 1. ` w � :��J 1 ' `L. � � • �� .' � ` •�- � . � ' 7I ` '�. ,�4 �, _ � � _ - 1 Li' � �, r,c � 1� �'' � ' �� \ , �•� ,� � ' rr • i ' a- � { � ` � ` � �� h ' � ' . _ �. � � - � � �'� � � , l � ,� � ` , , = '11 ` � ' � �+ � � ' `� t J� � s � .�`� � � � t , � � � '� 7 ". � � ��. � V i7. 7_ � � � � �� ' ` 1 . R _ �.. � ''*' � � ' � �� ,. �� v : . ' -- ' , � � � �� r � � `�' �� . �' - .� � '� .�'- '�c . '- � � '��. � ` L `" �� , ' � R :�. + .. A'�i: s � � - - - - � -, �► ��► � �.� . i- . � - � �. _ _ �. �� ., .....-....._. - !_.« .�°`°'." t�►vAr�u srREEr ew� wr (]�A7�7w"�� ..�.�� a.) �1l��M'l �s�/O�r .ST�. t �OCrL^.": �?!� S{'�1KAi�� GTTY O� SPOIGMIE. WA�YMIGTOII aiw � .�rr ~ • us •• •� -. �r'�t�Y� C/ �i � t1AVANA STREET s�f� ��Iw� � �isw `^°t"" -- - AY I1V[. to Mt3`�ION 57. � �, " • �� .. ,=.�;, � o �r sawr n►,s «ro DRO� Z0040G2 rttV�5+OK5 Ils dtAT .'�" GRADf O� LdT wwOes ontW ,��` � ` t ""'- �,'. ;.,.��., ��,�`�"�'�' ^i°1°Q "'"'► ORpJ�DWAY AVE. to MISSION ST. CJUI D[�pcc vW OiG � C0� SS S � � ct�.+na ��oKm :�a�, 100�0�:2 WiVANA ST DASDGEWNq1NMni_SLEr1d9C_IJOC�1008.Crrq ►�a►��a_ St_Ar+ege +/0.�2007 3:IN,29 M 1 L115�1 . M ��'; �MI f� � TIMO' � � �5�� av�a �r�t .� �r�a�a 3Nb'S��¢ �1t1� � ��.1 �l ��1� ��+�Y�k��"�!�� ti� � � � � � x � �►,� � � '�� 5 � A ��-�,� � 1 4 V�^� } t 4 � �, � ► ,� � � � � � � Y t ti � � � � � � � , � . � 4 � 4 S � � �'� ` ti � i � y � ; k ; � i � i l t � -a f �' �� .� � k �� 1� �� ° � � �'1� "�� 1�I,�'Z4 � '�'�e+�oe� ino +�1 N.1.0 � ME�l�5113 � �� r� � �� l� �L�,1 "l4L�RY*LC � 1�f.9�`LQ� WI"ttaYH �� 'l1°Oi?+Sli1 i�i �� "+1:lLAid'L 't!"dO+E£ 1115 t �.�— �� V1Pi- .��l�l��IT�lR! . 5� --- � � ,� 1 1 { . 4 1 �' t � � _ _ ..� �+ �t 1 t � ; w � � x� � �� `�( L�`► � �LY.Q�'L �� ,� �� "i�•�i+�1�Ct� 'LC f�k+i�' 11'1S � .s 1 ,� ,� :ti � :� '�.t �� _�,�, '3 �/1lR7 �■ �.■ � .� a � � k � � � � .--� � � � � � � ��. tsa-� ��+�. �rrraas 4"��'�i m f �� lM� �� 0 � M��1�1i �.r mr� �.r++f�l e� �7�1 � � - a ,�i, � C�79tilt� � � LJiiulillyd�Q � u.� E, '� - � +��'�"'� �t ,.� � .... � Q MK11�11� "�'�AidR'.r .�? �11'.1 I xsa n,�r� s��a � w�++aE r� w..�w �.�r a..a�rs� � rw�..t K1 �N� I � � � ,�o �as �r � � � �*'reut �+ �e+. � �+rw .;e awnu, 1�i'7'Y ws�.� �...r.rr� �.,s`.rt .,. r ..a�rt � .w�,�.w �liw � a�s 'a�r .A f - arr � �r.� . 1�iM�'3' Att}li�fltlt�*.FY�7 ��ft�'�L t+ �a�318�1� �1�I'��d�' �`C� A.�..I� �'� ��C}d�f'�d 1�.'b''Id�IQi�3��,� Q�,�I�� 5��b1� J.Hti'sf�07 #.Yiil�`"tl `3"5`H'� 't�3?wM10 ti �.i � �� •. •A� A4 t e � � { � � �� "0.� Y`+r�F � ,� �.+ w� �,� . 1 4 �G i � � � -- � / � e4; '}; ti. � � #+ � l ��t °r ��! 1 R;4 ��`; � � / � y � " s �� .� � � 5.,��}�� t I�T � � � "�r �� 4 �� ~~ v "*� � � � . � �� t�r� ra�r�a �o-�� ,nr�s � t46�rt� AFiyr}MG� 31`�hY'r� kIW 3Lid �r'MLFq� 1 ll:sPiM1Cr 'J� Y75 �6'�-Y�lY' �� 4� .,� � r .. .. � — _ _ _' � 4 � � � �f 1 '., i �U6"2� L5� � � � � KY k+dML�V�Ol�B 3 4Z�T .� Ii1Si4ML '11 e� a+ � �+�? A,�4^p � � � ��+ ��3 k�� -� 337S�I�:N. '�i� W.38 J4klxtl �3 � � �� .-._. ``- �T �-- � :�� I " a " i � �; ; 1 1 � � � � � �� r�s � ,��s �c ,r�ar�a '� � -`�� -� � t�uar�e s►�o-a � �'It 1�431�S7f1CNfUii �ICaI �YY�]L ,�11 � � � M�j i t �, _! ��.-� � �� , r --� � �, I +�► •�, - - ,� � � wr.�-+r� �` '� ''�� I �; �. �MM7� IIS +kif7 �11 � + .UO�iC`r � 1 . � �4�i U+� �ri � � `��'� + , � ��...��—,_��. ' l�IE1I��71�1�lil� .�.� ~_.�_�..��_�-------'� T _ ,_,.� •— �,. � �.,�� — i1l�iiiir �� f��fl r . . .. ��!'�ii��ii��s�l��i�i��i��. � �--� "� .l� � �� . . — � �r a.�.. �� .� �� . �R+�"� �I '7l�'G'1L� . .�.— ... � _. ' •~ � �.�_ � ; ��f ��.��; , , �� i ��"�� - � r ■i, ._ !' ,�.��,..��,_.:�,,,_s_ ,s_� �_:.��__—. —�_,�� , � �� , � �� N�+►�y Y�'i � °� ,r�u� �4+L'lfi+'l�C Mtf 1��V�� -lRN�1�� 39�r�# `� �'4 i '� L 1� S. �. t T - ---"'" � � �' _' �.�r � u��r+-r�w I j +pt�"i�. � o� � � �� I � ' � I ,� � N I � I i �st I i 2E�t5f i � � � � � � � � , � `�d'�d�f,+1VH � p � ��4�� I I �Ilii��i9 �Y�� I � � � L � � � � 11 N � � ...��--� �..�._-.�,��_,_,__��.._�.�� A L-- f � - �s �ao�m'�#�+�a�e f 3NMM11GdS � Ai@ 3Ft�1 QL �4�t11�0�i1'C�! 110� �;E��tsss� �rrhr 1p i�r7'r�rr w� � � � ;t� 'bi �'6 °�Y�111i" �� IIC3lJ �.�E��i�'.�� 3�M1Y AYM,6�U}i0 � qG4# �. 4 t ��v 't] 3�w. hI0GIt9M T �nyd ��C31i1W0 � �� ~ s.1��7. . �! � �� if • �.7 � "�V�II�'�� '� '�l�� '1 �I�''I�i .�IrD��,i�i��' �►,'�'`� �� H�� `�+�5 � �� '�'�1�L�H °'.°"'�`�"�' �' �d! HS 2� 3 t��47 ti's+ �[I� �I IYW� A1' 6Y]IIM 'RM ��i'� 'I ,M ►7�' � w �L 3 � �'► N �`1 �`�". �J" "1��71'� "'OQ "�� LM1 M[7f A I IiCL .. 4lLTLy �0€�'Til� J�iP�'� a41ii'i�+� "i� �i Lti�# .. lli4`tf - 4 #IL'�d - � � �.� � �.,�- �.�.� �'�9 �-711�7 R71Y 7W `Al�h C'��'6.. L " �'R Mi'L1 . 3�ti�ki '31F1 i1134�t3 dHYD � " �K'i 40D'17i � � 11Jtu'9 � •� � `]lM F#I:� AIIMI'S .. _ r _ _ � � �� ' �"" � � , r+osmir - o �rc� 'I�vsrriv �° �1va � � r� � � �' k �� r i �I 1 1 � ! M 1 I f �rA � f i� 1 e ► CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: April 14, 2009 City Manager Sign-off: Item: CheCk ell that epply: ❑ consent � old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report � pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First Reading Proposed Ordinance 09-008, Comprehensive Plan Amendments (includes text and map amendments) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A (Growth Management Act) PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: On March 31, 2009, Council was briefed at the study session on comprehensive plan map amendments CPA-01-09 through CPA-08-09. BACKGROUND: The Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan includes an annual amendment cycle that runs from November 2 to November 1 of the following year. The Planning Commission considers applications received prior to the November 1 deadline in late winterlearly spring of the following year, with a recommendation to City Council in late spring/eariy summer. All parts of the Comprehensive Plan (maps and text) can be amended during the annual cycle. The Community Development Department received one site-specific Comprehensive Plan map amendment; city staff initiated three site-specific Comprehensive Plan map amendments. Sites that are approved for a Comprehensive Plan Map amendment automatically receive a zoning designation that is consistent with the new Comprehensive Plan Map designation. Additionally, staff initiated Comprehensive Plan amendments to Chapter 2— Land Use; Chapter 3— Transportation; Chapter 4— Capital Facilities Plan & Public Service; and Chapter 8— Natural Environment. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PROPOSALS: Comprehensive plan amendment proposals are organized into individual reports consisting of application materials, staff reports, and letters submitted to date to assist the City Council's review. The Spokane Valley Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on March 12, 2009, to consider proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. After hearing public testimony the Commission made recommendations on CPA-02-09 through CPA-04-09 and CPA-06-09 through CPA-OS-09. Further research was requested on CPA-01-09 and CPA-05-09. On March 26, 2009, the Planning Commission held a hearing and made recommendations on CPA-01-09 and CPA-05-09. OPTION • Advance the ordinance to second reading; remand to Planning Commission for fu�ther consideration; or conduct a public hearing on proposed deviations from the Planning Commission's recommendation. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS: Advance ordinance 09-008 to a second reading STAFF CONTACT: Greg McCormick, AICP, Planning Division Manager; Mike Basinger, AICP, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Draft Ordinance Exhibit 2 Planning Commission Findings and Recommendation 1 of 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOK;ANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 09-008 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKA.NE COUNTY WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE 06-010 ADOPTING THE CITY UF SPO�:ANE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE, PLAN AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, through Spokane Valley Ordinance 06-010, the City of Spokane Valley adopted Land Use plans and regulations as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan, Capital Facilities Plan, and Maps as the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Spokane Valley; and WHEREAS, the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) allo�ti�s comprehensive plans to be amended annually (RCW 36.70A130); and WHEREAS, amendments to the City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan may be initiated by the Planning Commission (Commission), the City Council (Council) or by the Community Developm`�� I�� -��,, . ,, :��;i �- � ��i,�r� r� ��l!� ,�� ,1�._�� ci .,, .,� �>> , ��f,.,,. warrant ad j ustments; an �. i WHEREAS, the GMA requires comprehensive plans to be implemented witl�: development re�ulati�ns. includin� the zonine of rr��ert�� c�nsistent «•ith land use mat� designations; an�i WHEREAS, consistent with the GMA, City of Spokane Valley adopted Pul�li� Participation Guidelines to direct the public involvement process for adopting and amendin� comprehensive plans; ar�:s WHEREAS, the C;ompret�ensive �'1�.� ��:_�� i�:i,, t':�::� ,�1��_i;�1�.;,� ��I«�:ti ,�,.� ��i-,;:i! i received until�November 1 of each year; anc� Vi�'HEREAS, applications were submitted by the applicant, owner or by Cit}' staf�� t, � amend the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps for the purpose of beneficiaUy usin� chc: property described herein; and WHEREAS, following the application to the City, staff conducted an environn�ei�t.jl review to determine the potential environmental impacts from the proposed amendments; a� �: WHEREAS, after reviewing the Environmeotal Checklists, staff issued a Determina�i,�<i of Nonsignificance (DNS) for the proposals, published the DNS in the Valley I�: ��,��, � 11. .. 1.I . posted the DNS on the sites and mai led the DNS to all affected public a�� ;:�:: i:� �I WHEREAS, the Cc►mmission cc�nducted a briefine on Febrtiar �� r �. �' ��i ��i. �� r�•�, ��,� t i �;: rr�,�,�,�� ;�rr.e.n.��mcnt�; ��i (��iir... �,�j_(��ti (��>;r�� i'�.... :1�z:��:�?��.... f'��_ i . . �.� WHEREAS, notice of the Commission puhlic hearing �vas published in the Valley Ne«•s Herald at least 14 days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, on February 20, 2009, notice of the Commission hearing was mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of the subject properties ; and �4�REAS, notice of the hearing was posted on the subject property; and WI-�REAS, the Commission received evidence, information, public testimony and a staff report and recommendation at a public hearing on March 12, 2009; and WHEREAS, the Commission conducted a public hearing on March 12, 2009, to consider proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use map and text. After hearing public testimony, the Commission made recommendations on site-specific map amendments CPA-02- 09 through CPA-04-09. Further research was requested on site-specific map amendment CPA- 01-09 and CPA-OS-09. The Commission also deliberated on the proposed staff initiated text amendments. The Commission made recommendations on text amendments CPA-06-09 through CPA-08-09. The Commission requested minor changes to the Public!Quasi-Public provisions in CPA-0�-09. The Commission continued the publ ic hearing to March 26, 2009 for CPA-O 1-09 and CPA-OS-09; and WHEREAS, the Commission deliberated on CPA-Ol -09 and CPA-OS-09 on March 26, 2009; the Commission recommended approval of all amendment proposals; and WHEREAS, on March 31, 2009, Council reviewed the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, on April 14, 2009, Council considered a first ordinance reading to adopt the proposed amendment; and WHEREAS, on May �12 2009, Council considered a second ordinance reading at which time Council approved written f"indings of fact setting forth their basis for recommending approval of the prop�sed amendments. NOW, THEREFORE, the Ciri� Council of the Cin� of Spokane Valley do ordain as follows: Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the Comprehensive Plan Map(s) adopted through Ordinance No. 06-010, and amend the Comprehensive Plan text adopted through Ordinance No. 06-010. Seetion 2. Findin�s. The City Council acknowledges that the Commission conducted appropriate investigation and study, held a public hearing on the application and recommends approval of the amendments to the Comprehensive Plan map and text. The City Council hereby adopts the findings of the Commission, specifically that: Ordinance 09-008 Comp Plan Amendments Page 2 of 6 1. Notice for the proposed amendments was placed in the Spokane Valley News Herald on February 20, 2009 and each site was posted with a"Notice of Public Hearing" sien, v�rith a description of the proposal. 2. Individual notice of the map amendment proposals w�as mail�d to all propertti� o�vners �vithin 400 feet of each affected site. 3. Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA — RC�V 43.21C) environmental checklists were required for each proposed comprehensive plan map and text amendmen� �. Staff reviewed the environmental checklists and a threshold determi.nation was made for each comprehensive plan amendment request. Determinations of Non-significance (DNS) ��ere issued for the requested comprehensive plan amendments on December 19, 200�. 5. The DNS's were published in the city's official newspaper on December 19, 2008 consistent with the City of Spokane Valley Environmental Ordinance. 6. The Spokane Valley Pianning Commission conducted a public hearing on March 12, 2009, to consider the proposed amendments. After hearing public testimony, the Commission made recommendations on CPA-02-09 through CPA-04-09 and CPA-06-09 through CPA-08-09, excluding CPA-O 1-09 and CPA-OS-09. 7. The Commission continued the public hearing for CPA-01-09 and CPA-OS-09 to March 26, 2009. � 8. On March 26, 2009, the Commission made recommendations on CPA-01-09 and CPA-OS-09. 9. The planning goals of the Growth � Management Act (GMA) were considered and the proposed amendments are consistent ��ith the GMA. 10. The goals and policies of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan were considered and the proposed amendments are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 1 l. The proposed l�nd use a�id zoning designations are consistent ��ith the current use of the properties. 12. Findings were made and factors ��ere considered to ensure compliance ��ith approval criteria contained in Section 17.80.140 H. (Comprehensive Plan amendment and area-wide rezones�) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). 13. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and text amendments �vill not adversel�� affect the public's general health, safen�, and �velfare. Section 3. Pro er �. The properties subject to this Ordinance are described in Attachment "A." Section 4 . Map Amendments Pursuant to RGV�' 35A.63.073 the City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan and Map as adopted through Ordinance No. 06-010, is hereby amended as set forth in AttAChment "A." The Compreh�nsi��e Plan Map Amendments are generall}' descrih�d a> f��ll��« s: Ordinance 09-OOS Comp Plan Amendments Pa�e 3 of 6 Map Amendments File No. CPA-01-09: Appljcation/Description of Proposal: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment to change the designation on parcels 45242.9032, 45242.9033, 45242.9035, 45242.9036, 45242.9050, 45242.9051, 45242.9056 and 45242.9057 from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential. Appl�cant: Marie Olbricht; 15710 East 4'� Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 99037 Brook and Jody Kamp; 12110 East 10�' Avenue; Spokane Valle}-, VdA 99206 Joy Swenson; 15808 East 4`� Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 99037 Dennis Crapo; 15321 East Mission Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 99037 Christine Kimball; 15714 East 4`� Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 99037 Amendment Locatjon: Parcels 45242.9032, 45242.9033, 45242.903�, 45242.9036, 45242.9U50, 45242.9051, 45242.9056 and 45242.9057; located on the south side of 4�' Avenue between Sullivan Road and Conklin Road; further located in the south half of the northwest quarter of Section 24, Township 25 I�Torth, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. Couacil Decisioa: Change Parcets 45242.9033, 45242.9035, 45242.9036, 45242.9050, 45242.90� 1, 45242.9056 and 45242.9057 to High Density Residential. Change Parcel 45242.9032 to Medium Density Residential. � File No. CPA Application/Description of Proposal: Cit}�� initiated site specific Comprehensive Plan map amendment on parcels 45242.1002 and 45242.1006 from High Density Residential (HDR) to Neighborhood Commercial (NC). Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 1]?07 E Sprag�ue Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendment Location: 1'he northeast corner of 4 Avenue and Sullivan Road, parcels 45242. l 002 and 45242.1006, addressed as 31 S and 325 South Sullivan Road; further located in the NW '/4 of the NW '/, of Section 24, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. Counsel Decision: Change ta l�►`eighborhood Commercial (NC) File No. CPA-03-09: Application/Description af Proposal: Comprehensive Plan Map a�T�endment from Office (�) to Communih� Commercial (CC) on six (6) parcels composing approximately 3.5 acres of land. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendment Location: The proposal is located between Mullan Road and Argonne Road from the north side of Boone Avenue to the south�side of Sinto Avenue; specifically located in the SE '/� of Section 17, Township 25 North, Range 44, East Willamette Meridian, Spokane Vallev, Washington Council Decision: C6ange to Communit�• Commercial (C) . File No. CPA-04-09 Applicstion/Descriptioa of Proposal: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment to change from Community Commercial (CC) to Lo«� Densiry Residential (LDR) on approximately .47 acres of land. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendment Location: The proposal is located on St Charles Road, approximately 780 feet north of Sprague Avenue on the east side of Progress Road; specifically located in the SE'/4 of Section 14, Township 25 North, Range 44 East Willamette Meridian, Spokane Valley, Washington. Councii Decision: Chaoge to Low Density Residential (LDR) Ordinance 09-008 Comp Plan Amendments Page 4 of 6 File No. CPA-05-09: Application/Description of Proposal: A Ciry initiated text amendment to Chapter Z— Land Use. The amendment updates Table 2.1 with new land quantity analysis information; updates/adds annexation goals, policies and text The amendment also evaluates all properties designated public/quasi-public and proposes an appropriate land use designadon and zone based on the predominant land use surrounding the property. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendment Location: Text amendments to Chapter 2— Land Use will have city-wide implications. Amendments to Public/Quasi-Public properties are located throughout the city. Council Decision: Adopt Te�ct amendments to C6apter 2— Land Use; eliminate the publiclquasi public land use designation and change to land use designations consistent with surroundi�g designations. File No. CPA-06-09 Application/Description of Proposal: Text amendment to Chapter 3— Transportation: Add text for ne�� bike classification; add new bike lanes that are complete or �vill be by the end of the construction season: - Montgomery from Woodruf�'to Universit�� - Wellesley from Evergreen to Progress - Mansfield from Montgomery to SR 27 Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendme . T � .... � . � . ` ,f t � •,t.; (• i j r_�n. .��_�•"1?' r�.i �: ,�� 1; \ . l 'il'-�i i:_�` nt I.��;�ti��E� c�:, •� :.. :, , (�1 =, implication�. COUnCiI D��isi��►: <��,��t l� ':1I :ifjl�lifj[lll'llt5 tU C 'h�,}�i��t� 3—�l r�z[r�;��c►e�t�.ti��n. File No. CPA-07-09 Applicallon/Description of Proposal: Text amendment to Chapter 4— � apital ! acili�ie� I'ia« �c.i- I') a��i Public Services: Update the 6-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP); update R/ater Districts & �Vellheads map; update Parks & Recreation map; update 6-year Sewer map; add aonexation area !et�el of service language: � . Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 992(�� Amendment Location: Text amendments to ChapteT 4— CFP & Public Services will have cir� -��. ��:�_ implications. PC Re +�<►T11IIlE'Il(j atinn: :�clo�t te�t aiTierldments tc� C'ha�tc�r =� — C'FF �� Fuhlie �erti ic�::. Filc :�u. (�Y:�-U�i-U'� Apptication/Descriptiuu uI� F CU�)UJJ�: 1 C\i u!IiC11�1:ilClii iU L.11a�!i�[ � ,�aill!�l! �:ii� ifUiltil�ili: i:f' .,_.:� Wetlands map; update Fish & Wildlife Habitat map. Applicant: City of Spokane Valle}•, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 992� ►� � Amendment Location: Text amendments to Chapter 8— Natural Environment will have city-�� i� : implications. PC Recommendation: Adopt teat amendments to Chapter 8— Natural Environme» �. Comprehensive Plan C6apter Amendments. Pursuant to RCW 35A.63.073 the C;ity �� : Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan and Map as adopted through Ordinance No. 06-010, i� hereby amended as set forth in Attachment "B" (amendments to Chapter 2— Land Use; �hapt��. 3— Transportation; Chapter 4— Capital Facilities Plan & Public Services; and Ch�:;�:. �� 1�Tatural En��imnment.l Ordinance 09-008 Comp Plan Amendments Page 5 of 6 Section 5. Map - Copies on File-Administrative Action. The Comprehensive Plan (with Maps) is maintained in the office of the City Clerk as well, as the City Department of Community Development. The City Manager or designee, following adoption of this Ordinance, is suthorized to modify the Comprehensive Plan Map in a manner consistent with this Ordinance. Section 6. Liabili �. The express intent of the City of Spokane Valley is that the responsibility for compliance with the provisions of this ordinance shall rest with the permit applicant and their agents. This ordinance and its provisions are adopted with the express intent to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the general public and are not intended to protect any particular class of individuals or organizations. Section 7. Severabilitv. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance. Seetion 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in �futl force and effect five (5) days after publicatioo of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provideti by law. PASSED by thc: Cit}� Council this day of May 12, 2009 Mayor, Rich Munson ATT'EST: City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge Approved As To Form: Office of the City Attorney � Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 09-008 Comp Plan Amendments Page 6 of 6 . ` Department of Community Development . . "'kane ��ail � , Planning Division . om �e ensive an a men men s Pl 'n Co 'ssio� Recommendation g CPA-01-09 throu h CPA-�8-09 g Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2009 �� .� „ �' 1. I 1 1 1 1 � 1 ' t �''�'�- �_� ,�.�, .. �. � �1 ' � . � � ' �• 1 1 1� � 1 1 ' _'�' . � ,.,,• � �� • •�1.�� " "" r _� � � i � .� . i� .� 1 :! � . , � . � �� ::.... .:: ::: :::::::..;::.::: • . :.. .:: :. :;:� �•• : :;. :,' :,::: . . _ :;:::: :,: -;;;: .., , . � � � � . • :::: ::::::: :::::.:::::::::: �; � ................ � :..... .. ' �� i 1 ".� . . - . . . . . - ::::� .... . . � .-. . . � � . . � � �� ,. ' , ' �' N • 1 � ' • ' � ♦S�r� i �r` _, .0 l• � - i � •� � •�• Si: : j � Iwa'�r�aG�w��♦ � � .AI 2 . � �:• - .. _ � • � .:. ' ::? .: .. .. �� :�:�t '� . , : � .•� , ;If g'::::.'� •, ,-,. s.��z. i:;:C�itt',.;f :::: � t�.l.• :•► �� s:..� � r �r • s ��- ..��'�=w'=r :�S t•ie � ' , •�� i r �•l3Cl�• �.�.4 �� I: _ wia• � �Y:u t �� } i.�i:�=a• •• �� i �ii�i'��=�:ii• ��• • �� • .:::?: :��rt� .�.:i:::�:;• .i::�::.:�..:i .•..::..��•:..� � . .� .s:� :;:. ; .s�,f'r :a;�t�• ,. .........:::: •..::::•...: �:::::.....:...., `rs:►.s:....i .�L „ r ! •...7 � � ..............1::• .�.�.... i.i� • f ••_�.. .. g � ... ! ♦ p • • •�.�� i::ei::i:::=' :::'::i. , ��/I!M'��1•�j��i.iHiN~Ii � ��r• � • • ♦ • �ii� � •,i�: � �s�;�•r ••«s.s�..... . .:::.:: '•ei:i:::�.�c:�i3i• ;.':,:.;::: .......:� ��N•��Nh� •. r �R 1�rt� r ��\��• �� Y��;�� •�� •1��• ♦�i :�•��,'��M�� ►�� i� •�� • � ;:�:r.3•s , :I;..:.•:�:�:�: :;; ,...s; .... . .�.... � �.... ;�, . .. . " . , ., :, :: • .. , �:.... .z. ....Y..,�."S � :: .r��i�.i..� 1 tZ �� i.. •• �f1�. •�/= � .�� • � •ai�.L.«=.��n• }• ` � ��~ � • �-� •..�...(. �� :N �. i� � � • w: � • M= L � � ` :��ii�:♦ , . � . . � � .. ......J`::i' r � � � . ^' � ,.. • • �u r • �t +� • �•� Ri•�f•��i �� i.�.�i �/�• �.*�j , i:: , i:�:e�Z •� � !• i• ZZ � , :�.=t��r: ��1�.ii�•�. =i�:! i.��t •i �+ ��• �:.. , ��, •�i�� • � • �►' M �/ A� � � ii�'�: � r�� • •r..•` �.• •�♦ ��N�1• ' � . �.f�.� �� • �� .... - SSH ��s �� T � ~ , W. � •��• /ti r �� • �i=' N��.��►��.ei:+/�� i��2: .•t•N . •. !.•. a�.= •1��...� ��i7Z •r an a.N � w • v � r a• w ' • ti• sa.� �.�r:��.��. .�.� r�• .S�r.�f • T:. :'�'�'•�. ..... •. . •. ♦a ; !. ! •.. r.... ..."r• ..; . ... ..�.•�.: :i�.:�• ":t:�� .�i ""3� �"�' iir r�s M� �� w�iii:.• . .... �ti _��►l�'N • s N11 ��Z�.11�� 1��•l ��j • ►� ` •��II�• .t)��• � •. �} • _ � � � rI�1��.lf •� • r� r� s�♦ • • •..�...• �• •i��• �r�•s. •�•• � •..��i•Q 1��.��Nq�N . M� !N��.Yt � � ! � � .� ��a�+•Z N��M Nf ZS tZff •rf�� .•��• •�� it:. �. Z:l.f.. �....a • � •...�3.� �. .LC 2t �i• •. ..= ' •i3s � �' � •` �`�i't. i N1 '• � . � • •}��-��i i��KM . • a �•�2N�•�Y�• U Z �'•��t� a� • iZ��wiiN� •��p�� • � ��{•�►i�• •. �..'�;1�ii��,•�i •��R „�� i�� t • u• �iii�� y� =s�'•ei..��t ♦ j '� • Z .� �... ,• i��M�N �wr• � •/ ♦ 4iN� �� r�t��:ii�i� • � • Z�ii�l� • � i��f �: . �.�• t • � �• � 1 �iY �i j •tiJ�i'��• � ��• � �. �'.� •�v�,� �� •� • i�� _• � r�i�i��.ryi �� • • •• �• • s �i ? 11�� r * • ' � t � r =rS,.. .Z�.�L, t •,�. 3.��.,�,� �....} 2.::•: � ;••;•, ... • . , � • - �- :;: e. � •N „• •• ��r �■ �,� '1 �� ► • . •• •��• iii ~ + ` � �M�S I �i�i � � �I �.� • � ��i\�ii • Z ' • ��1�::� .f A�(�• : �.N��) } [� �� • � '�3�� 2� .. . �►� ♦ • .. .CL. ..��... ,�. ��r.t,r � i. ■ �..►• �t �• 3 • N•r.. �I• (� =i�� •ti�iii i Z� �.�� Si N�iii�ii S�.��I�VR�1��U��• �M •��`.�5� 1 N �� •• •ii�� I�1'ft •�{�fR�rl • i �I • ♦ � Yf�� •��♦ '�r� t• ♦� �• •�..• � _ � I=•M p � • •I�� H • � •� •�� ■l��• �_ ��f � �� •• •• f�Y-f�• •� j. •��• ►� • �� .1��• ♦}�•�•. • a�iL�• ►i• ♦ Ia�•��4 . � a� ��♦2•.��• � �� • 1. �M� ,1{• •��• M��I • � i.� � �. ♦ N��1"�N� t ♦ •��l�\��L�� ♦��1��i�• ii��a• Z�w�i• � •��. �� M •i• ��1• H�� •�t �S.�i�«��,! 1 ��• ��ry�A� �� J � il��1�N�� , � � t�2l��.� N� • ••�SW�Z'la��a• N��^��.Z�F •�ii�� • . , � ��A� •� t � �� ^ � es�w..�r • � NM�s r1 ��• ;�a )��• �y� i��li � ir�ylfl�NlN��i��1�q � • 1 �Y��• ti!. ■ � ��f�• • ♦�i.• • e • � ��iiifi ilii � � • r * M � W � ��:ti ♦ • � ' r � •�� • � fi L.�A1�1� ;T��. • •�� f �� Vl�lli .•�• •�iY��` ■- L •�� j y� N ♦ J1�•�• •• /r• . 1� •►� �► o N Z�� w�� ■■ � •�'� ~�+� Nst .��4 �� \ 1C� � � • �� -• �r . r� �s-�s�t�s;;. , :�t�k,.;�:s� s •.s� c��r•�� . ; z � . � �ts. :.�.. . �.� z�� ` . .��s �t ` * S 3 t .!'...�� •``S •' •�i,»"tii,�;�' • , .. . ..iu.'�� µ!�y w �� ` '�:�..r �2 ..: � ..: t ..,. . ._ � • - . �L,'."��f� _ � •` ��f.r��/ � lli��MI�1�1M��iN�• f �� , �� `r 1�• � ��i� a • � � •• i�� VMI�V �� u�N�1�� .�- s.� ...... �:�r. :: rt�:.. . .a�:s:: ■ � ,....:�.,..��:::: •. � . ..,.�a.. . �� s.t �• ••-� ...,.... :ii: t :,:��,�s.. }}}�� ► �'��r� �.�• •�tr�s� �� t�iir��i.►�� ..�• r • ii��•• •.:I:i:: y�i� , :.... ..:.:.'•.�........3.�..«_ �� • � • •. .. ..... .. .f.�:: ...... : �... ..3:. :i::i t . t t'� ....... ........_. I ��`` ,..._...�. .. ...........�_... .. � _... ♦LN��• •• �=`• : •��1��tt� � ��1��Zt� •\• t • � •Zi��I��i��►�j��• • • !• •�\��• ��• � �� i •�� •• •�• •� •�r�.• t ••t1��.1 N .��•�...� ��•��I�1�.�1•••......: •� • •. :::�•�.••«�i::ii::::: > � .�..•��•��.�.••....! ♦!1.'. ••�r��••�• •.•••. . . . .. - ��afv�� 1f� ��t � . .� � 1 � ' . � 11 • y � �� 1 � � � �� ' • • ' ' • f , a t � �:� . • �� . i _ ,. . r � �+ • •• .. • ' • � � � � / � � ' _ : : • • ��iT� j . �a fv . 1 ��' .� �-- 'ra . .. 1 �z � , 1�9�� ,� �.. �,�' � � � �ir r11�= �, . � , -� !"' �u � ■ � �i-„+ ��11�� — r� �a .�.. . _ �1tl�r■ ..rs ' � �.° �-y — --,.�— � �� • �i�--= i�� i � ;_ � �i . .�� _ � �� ! , �.� - � �� _ � • � r�1 �� II f ` " ` '' w � �-- __.. � �i�C�"n'�c, -__ � ��IL E� �� . _ _ � �� ■ � —�i�� `� �� i■i li�t ,� � ►'-� `•�` �'—' �� ■ ,.� i� E �� ■I!�� G.r..�si�a� �� ''�+r��►� C�..r �� li- i� ii ��I�I�. �� . `G� ' __1 • tr'� _ � I�� R ��. — '� � !" ��I■ ( � �:.� ;�'3C 1� � . , ��..�. � �� ■ a�1��1. ■ �.��s',��i�it�ill�`�!� .� �r-- .�� .�:� ..,� = ��' E.,. �— � �! R � _� .- _� °� p��i� � ��:�I��i.�rr .� =, � �r..� i�■1 t�. E'��. � .a ,� �,�;, .__,��-�,,� r � i ��__" � ��■■��.�- :t: �• .�' ��' .�.�i! � • G� �� ir��,�'t��l�l■ GT�i �!1,� M� � �I � 1 � � � �1, :a�� • r ;��1 t � � � �� '+ �.t� ��'� �r7�� r "�� . rl � � Y �a� .. . . 4 C�"_C' ��:. . 1�: �;1'S• � tIL �'�� - ' ,� ► ,.`y �� w 7 � `_'::�'�i� �� 1�� . ♦ . � ■�' R�ar� � � � � ' Gt�u• � ■1l��ii� ��`�� •ti Yi ■�r��r� � �� {'� L'� .�� '�.'I ` a■ �• f .i.�iu��w' ��,,!��.1��! . . l r f � � ' �'� r-�i� --� �'~' "� '-�y`,,,,� `►�'� � � ..��_�.. '��'�'� � . �� I"� � � � �• �� 1� � �� '� —_y �� ' —'�� 1 1 � �r : � ' � +�'"', �;� �� , � �'�� '�t..�1a � ,� , � �� `l � • r � i � S� �r- �� f� � �"i� �:ii� � �� t � �� - *-� � � � - - ' . • � 11• `m"""�,5�°�� Depari:ment of Community Development -� ' n, �e , . . . ��alle � Planning Division • � ues lons. Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2009 �: c111 (N p okane Valle � 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 1Q6 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99246 504.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1006 ♦ cttyhall�spokanevalley.or� _ _ --�n = _ -s�-;�-_ -��.-�--:��---�.- -_�..__..�.. _ emoran um To: Mayor and City Councflors From: lan Robertson� Chalr - Spokane Valley Planning Commisslon Date: April 14, 2009 Re: Planning Commission Findings and Recommendation: CPA-01-09 through CPA-08-09 BACKGROUND The Spokane Vatley Municipal Code (SVMC 17.80.140) inciudes an annual amendment cycle that runs from November 2"� to November 1�` of the following year. Applications reoeived prior to November 1�` are considered by the Pianning Commission in late spring of the following year, with a decision by City Council in late springleariy summer. All parts of the Comprehensive Plan can be amended during the annual cyde. The Community Development Department received one request for a site-specific Comprehensive Plan map amendment. The City initiated three site-specific Comprehensive Pian map amendments and initiated a number of Comprehensive Plan text I amendments. Sites that are approved for a Comprehensive Plan amendment will automaticaily receive a zoning designation that is consistent with the new land use designation. Text amendments are proposed to Chapter 2— Land Use; Chapter 3— Transportation; Chapter 4— Capital Facilities Plan & Public Service; and Chapter 8— Natural Environment. A majority of these amendments are relatively minor in nature and update or correct information. More substantive amendments are being recommended to Chapter 2— Land Use and Chapter 4— Capital Facilities Plan & Public Service. Amendments to these chapters add annexation goals and policies, and annexation area level of service language. The Spokane Valley Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on March 12, 2009, to consider the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Lend Use map and text. After hearing public testimony, the Commission made recommendations on CPA-02-09 through CPA-04-09 and CPA-06-09 through CPA-OS- 09. The Commission continued the public hearing to March 26, 2009 to allow for further research on CPA-01- 09 and CPA-05-09. On March 26, 2009, the Planning Commission made recommendations on CPA-01-09 and CPA-05-09. The Planning Comrnission's findings and recommendation on CPA-01-09 through CPA-OS-09 are summarized below: FINDINGS 1. Notice for the proposed amendments was placed in the Spokane Valley News Herald on February 20, 2009 and each site was posted with a"Notice of Public Hearing" sign, with a description of the proposal. 2. Individual notice of the site-speGfic map amendment proposals were mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of each affected site. 1 of 4 i 3. Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA — RCW 43.21 C) environmental checklists were required for each proposed comprehensive plan map and text amendment. 4. Staff reviewed the environmental checklists and a threshold determination was made for each comprehensive plan amendment. Determinations of Non-significance (DNS) were issued for the requested comprehensive plan amendments on December 19, 2008. 5. The DNS's were published in the city's official newspaper on December 19, 2008 consistent with the City of Spokane Valley Environmental Ordinance. 6. The Spokane Valley Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on March 12, 2009, to consider the proposed amendments. After hearing public testimony, the Commission made recommendations on CPA- 02-09 through CPA-04-09 and CPA-Ofi-09 through CPA-08-09. Further research was requested on CPA- 01-09 and CPA-05-09. 7. The Commission continued the public hearing for CPA-01-09 and CPA-05-09 to March 26, 2009. On March 26, 2009, the Planning Commission made recommendations on CPA-01-09 and CPA-05-09. RECOMMENDATION File No. CPA-01-08: ApplicationlDescription of Proposal: Comprehensive Plan IVlap amendment to change the designation on parcels 45242.9032, 45242.9033, 45242.9�35, 45242.9036, 45242.9050, 45242.9051, 45242.9056 and 45242.9057 from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential with a corresponding zoning change from Single-family Residential District (R-3) to Multi-family High Density Residential District (MF-2). Applicants: Marie Olbricht; 15710 East 4'� Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 99037 Brook and Jody Kamp; 12110 East 10�' Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Joy Swenson; 15808 East 4�' Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 99037 Dennis Crapo; 15321 East Mission Avenue; Spokane Valley� WA 99037 Christine Kimball; 15714 East 4�' Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 99037 Amendment Location: Located on the south side of 4�' Avenue between Sullivan Road and Conklin Road; further located in the south half of the northwest quarter of Section 24, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. PC Recommendation: Change parcels 45242.9050, 45242.9051, 45242.9036� 45242.9057, 45242.9056, 45242.9035, and 45242.9033 to High Density Residential (HDR) and zone to Multifamily High Density Residential District (MF-2) and change parcel 45242.9032 to Medium Density Residential (MDR) and zone to N1ultifamily Medfum Density Residential Dlstrict (MF-1) Flle No. CPA-02-09: ApplicationlDescription of Proposal: City initiated site specific Comprehensive Plan map amendment on parcels 45242.1002 and 45242.'i006 from High Density Residential (HDR) to Neighborhood Commercial (NC); corresponding zoning map amendment from Multi-family High Density Residential (MF-2) to Neighborhood Commercial (NC). Applfcant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste � 06, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendment Location: The northeast corner of 4�' Avenue and Sullivan Road, parcels 45242.1002 and 45242.1006, addressed as 315 and 325 South Sullivan Road; further located in the NVII'/< of the NW %4 of Section 24, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. PC Recommendation: Change to Neighborhood Commercial (NC) and zone to Neighborhood Commercial (NC) 2 of 4 File No. CPA-03-09: Application/Description of Proposal: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment from Office (0) to Community Commercial (CC); corresponding zoning map amendment from Office (0) to Community Commercial (C) on six (6) parcels composing approximately 3.5 acres of iand. Applicant: City of Spokane Vatley, 11707 E Sprague Ave� Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendment Location: The proposal is located between Mullan Road and Argonne Road from the north side of Boone Avenue to the south side of Sinto Avenue; specifically located in the SE '/. of Section 17, Township 25 North, Range 44, East Willamette Meridian, Spokane Valley, Washington PC Recommendation: Change to Community Commerclal (C) and zone to Community Commercial (C) File No. CPA-04-09 Application/Description of Proposal: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment to change from Community Commercial (CC) to Low Density Residential (LDR); corresponding zoning map amendment from Community Commercial (C) to Single-family Residential Urban District (R-4) on approximately .47 acres of land. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendment Location: The proposal is located on St Charles Road, approximately 780 feet no�th of Sprague Avenue on the east side of Progress Road; specifically located in the SE'/. of Section 14, Township 25 North, Range 44 East Willamette Meridian, Spokane Valley, Washington. PC Recommendation: Change to Low Density Residential (LDR) and zone to Single-famlly Residential Urban (R-4) File No. CPA-05-09: ApplicationlDescription of Proposal: A City initiated text amendment to Chapter 2— Land Use. The amendment updates Table 2.1 with new land quantity analysis information; updatesladds annexation goals, policies, and text. The amendment also evaluates all properties designated publiclquasi-public and proposes an appropriate land use designation and zone based on the predominant land use surrounding the property. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Val(ey, WA 99206 Amendment Locatlon: Text amendments to Chapter 2— Land Use will have citywide imptications. Amendments to Public/Quasi-Public properties are located throughout the city. PC Recommendation: Adopt amendments to Chapter 2— Land Use as proposed by staff. Flle No. CPA-06-09 ApplicationlDescription of Proposal: Text amendment to Chapter 3— Transportation: Add text for new bike classification; add new bike lanes that are complete or will be by the end of the construction season: - Montgomery from Woodruff to University - Wellesley from Evergreen to Progress - Mansfield from Montgomery to SR 27 Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendment Location: Text amendments to Chapter 3— Transportation will have citywide imp(ications. PC Recommendation: Adopt amendments to Chapter 3— Transportation as proposed by staff. File No. CPA-07-09 ApplicationlDescriptlon of Proposal: Text amendment to Chapter 4— Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) end Public Services: Update the 6-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP); update Water Districts & Wellheads map; update Parks & Recreation map; update 6-year Sewer map; add annexation area level of service language: Appticant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 10fi, Spokane Va11ey, WA 99206 Amendment Location: Text amendments to Chapter 4— CFP & Public Services will have citywide implications. PC Recommendation: Adopt text amendments to Chapter 4— CFP & Public Services as proposed by staff. 3of4 File No. CPA-08-09 Application/Description of Proposal: Text amendment to Chapter 8— Natural Environment: update Wetlands map; update Fish 8� Wildlife Habitat map. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendment Location: Text amendments to Chapter 8— Natural Environment will have citywide implica#ions. PC Recommendation: Adopt amendments to Chapter 8— Natural Envjronment as proposed by staff. ADOPTION OF FINDINGS: The Planning Commission is required to adopt findings of fact (Sections 17.80.140 8� 17.80.150) when recommending changes to the comprehensive plan. Each staff report contains findings applicable to the particular request. At the conclusion of the hearing for the comprehensive amendments, the Planning Commission, by separate motion, adopted the findings of fact contained in the staff reports for CPA-01-09 through CPA-08-09. Approved thls 26�' day of March, 2009 w�- lan Robertson, Chair City of Spokane Valley Planning Commission 4 of 4 ac men Exhibit l: Comprehensive Plan Map ----� — -- ---� ._ .�_ ��__ ` ti{;�;;�,�u; �n�.i.��:� .,,r, • i s r----- ' t , , ,- ` I C►ommunir� . ` C�cirnn`�ri �l' - �> I � • �t i ' I r--- ' � � ' 1 �r � � { ; ; -�----� I 1'ublic.r(1u:�si-Public � i'ul,lic �)u:�,i-i'ut�lic � � il�ei�fibortiooii� �: �' ' _n�f nd � E'c�mii��ei �R�cci:�n�_i � _ __ . � } � � � � ` �.-_ � � J i: a I - - - - -- � G I � � High I)t�r��i�� I�r — 3 rd .t_ - - - - _ _ t�Ie�iulri " � CPA-01-09 �� .,��-� , �� - Densit� �. Residential '= Ofti, e ��, I 4th - • -- --1 srf; ��: —•.;:,.� –; r ---- i – — - - � :`eichb o 3 Gomrnerci:il th o� � Sc `Sth �� ( � – �� f' 6th PublidQuasi- p � �� Public � .� ,�. " «�a t� r �+ o` � a �U � ti� � (fI Centrt�l PubticJQuasi-Public Valley Senior High 1 � � _ , ,-_ Lov+� Densitr R sidentinl � v_� Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map designation from LDR CPA-01-09 to HDR on parcels 45242.9050, 2.9051, 2.9036, 2.9057, 2.9056, City of Spokaae VaUey 2.9033 and 2.9035 with a subsequeat zoning of MF-2 and parce! Commnnity Development Department 45242.9032 be changed from LDR to NIDR designation with a subsequent zoning of MF-1. Exhibit 1: Comprehensive Plan Map ,� t � l.oa Densit� �T��clium �ens� y ; t l. J �tE��.i�!iri:ia � _ I Re�idential --•- �.- ----- � _ j , - - � ---- ` � �_ �^ � � � �� . , - � ^ ? � .� � � � , � --�-� - � � � l'•tTl??ltlillri i � � , '� � � l (ift�llllt'[CGl� ' � _�_,�� - i ------ pr� ;zi !;7rr.�u� �j�i�;:�;: � � � -- --�-�"'-----� � . � 1 -�- .. � r � .,; ;� �; � � ~ I �.��1 . � , - _ _ �d31 � � 1 - �•! �h '" 4._��.�- - _ � � ` . � I � . + ��OI'f1d01' •�,- -',; '�Zixed.t?sc �' � PubtidQus�si-Public . Public/Qu3si-Public �b � � : n n � nd { � � � t CPA-02 Nei�i�oi•lio�d ��C'diultt E 2 '( r;rt?r;?rioi;,l-: �Cilstt� ° ^' - — - ---- --� - — � " � - Resic��nt�al �d z z � � . . � ., . . . . . ' i , � :�. �� i� �;.�;��,; �,,:�� , ? '� -- � � �� I � - � � � UCsi�e � � � 4th� 4t -- . - --- .—__ . Neirhhi;r}i��:�i — - - � ��th-1—�SthJ�l u {� ` � COtllilll't'CI:1�,,. - � � � � = t � �,P � �"• Low Densit�• Residential � _ th 6th .. s � �' Public/Qunsf- �, � Public � �° � � � � � �� ° � .� `� PubliclQuasi-Public � Central VS��ey Senior High } j CPA-02-09 Request: Change the Comprehensive Plaa map designatioa City of Spokane Valley from HDR to NC; chaoge zoning from MF-2 to NC. Communjty De�•elopment I?eparhnent • / • " ' " � . � � - -- --- — -- - -- -- - ' � r "1 _ , .: �� , : I � � "" „"„I _ / I � , �/ _ ///f� � J � /� � ;� % / I � ; �i./ ., �./ � �.� � � i% :i � � � �i � � '/ :ii ;. � � � . �i � � �iiiiiji. �ii . � ■ ,1,,,1, - �— - , — -,� 1 - -, t � �• i r ��s „1 r� . .._� � �� i �� :: �� ■�■ L�::::�:.--�. �■� r iii�� ,,. _ y4 I . � ��ir � �-�� -_ ' �� ?�� .■ - u - _ ,,,, .. �� . � .� � : % ' /� . . �� , �, � � / :; �//j .%. � �� '� : . , �'s: ��% 's%%s �� ;. , .�i. :,/: � �� _ ■■ / ;�,��.,, ;,� . �� 's� i�' : �% _ � .,:., �. 1 � ;;..,.,:.�: s �� ,. -. _ , ,., �, 7 %/,, �/� j ,��, � ,• _/' • r • �i' ��/ �� ' � - : � � ! �.• i I , � 1�� ._-- - - -?�� , . , . . . , � iiii,i_��_— �� ■ . �� . -1 ■ ��%: %i � " ' r „ � •• •�/i _ � � :_ :j �� I '� •: •%%: - �� :: ;;� : �i �:•. . :; %• � �� %.• � .,� . � �1 . � �, /; � � � � �//s�!:;- : � 11 � � -,= �F.,�, �l �1 ' �%%;:i��s - � �1 �/. ,�� „11 11�� ,,, ■ ; : .. �•��.��i►�1i - ■ �■ " ��/ � � 11�� . � ��:-� :•. ../..� , , . . .•_::/:;. , . /,,. . ■ �../.,• , . ■ .. �,,./, �. , ../.••� � ../.-• � �../,.•� ■ ■ /,./,-. - ► �•%i/ � / �./� i� — � ��./ �� - - ■ ��. �. �i/� � %i%/ '- �-i � ■ ■ �� •.% • ■ ■ ■ % % � �:�%% ■ �/�� :�/. �� __ __ - _ _ _ .;;,-____;,_; � - � ■ . ' .- t�%'��% ■ � •:.. � � . , ,%;;.� � 1--�� '' I � �::% � � �. ,. ■ . .�.:� � � _% _:� i � : ��::�' � � "'� - , - .N •_•! ��!-- � I� ..■. ��i�� i/;:%i�:•:��, - _ �� ••� �:��- i• �� i �� ' �i � i �:., � �� .�. - ii� �� i� �i i� �� 1� � � � � � � 1 � � � � � � � � 1 • � : � � � � - - �— - - � � � ' � . . � . i�� ....».ie: ' : � � � � � � ��:::::;•f :•_ • ��•. �'.`�, , � . . '._� ::{U: .� � � '�•'I' =i: � �ii i:C41:�N. � r��.�N7, ;a:��• v� - :�' •':� ��•�: •� -�X�r: � I.. ..i:♦ •��! !:�•�•! f r �::��: : ��.• �v�Y�AS�. ' �n�+f�..,S�i.N�►�. '. •.�Y�: �.�1��♦ l�yy�iil� �.��i�� • f Y��s:ti�r� �• �'�''t? �. �7aM 1][! •N• 1Ya'� •'�� .ti'►. .Zti:: ti l :� •• �.:« :.,..�-,�i'l^`��'u. � ^ .� ...: • . . .. .- : t:.. . , �.._..s.�: -- -:_, � 1 � ' � . . . . _ .::..� I ::: - ":.. ��•. ;�: �, '.:: : :._: - �.-� �• � ��'::.._ _:::::� � � . ;: ' .:: ":: . - \ - ....•.;: � / _.--... :.::.::.:.::.' •�. _�;:' ::::: _... � � ' ..�'.::.:.:::.':. '::::• ::.-:; �.':� .•- � --+ .... ��•�-�' ,. ::: :.- �- � ::: '� •---- ._ ..� � .zr : � ::::::::::.::�': : : : _ � . �. _� � ., � t .a,[� r�.►�. } .�.. .r s�y`ss�� ` � -R:�i ��• • .•.� • •*��, a*• • ♦• :� �� ! • r��►.��.i ♦ ' f •��,�•�.�y� �siij�i N�J�f�l,ii.i •�S. !� ♦n �'.�� i. - � � • �� • • ~i��1�J1i' ��ia �•�1,. s�♦ ♦ •� � 1 ��►I%4C1��s�1 : ;�I• • ♦�� • rt L �*• .�.•• � '/R •��..��. •��Y � .��::N�•.� � ►••�.1t� �� N �l�e� •�.�aLI�`s.��.. � `�,vi�� •�� µ ��i.e.• .•:.i� `��:��^�I �i i�Y►il�� y�'�ii"{,� �.#'s�+� Ti •, �V� :...... .��: ` .'�1 Mi��ir�i��.�r�iy Y . +� ✓ . �i��i! w ��i.i�� ♦ ��.�.��.• `�• �'I •i �'� ♦�R..•.'•►��1�f.�llwr�l :�.�'ai ♦��sLI'�• ��r•i��\\l� _f��•� *��w��M��i� •�a'Yi��...�fi��1��r�Y� .��y►��• �� ♦�.. .f� �ia�►1'. �• t •l�p�• j �-�S �� a+•��.•.��♦ •��i• -d .►r�rtii ' . •�•:i%►.�•#�i �� s - .��..1 ��• .��L��.... • . .� `\� �l'M }� •.��V • • •• M��i � ♦�P\• - •• l� •• J �� M � • • •��.�� `� N • •�J�L �� - . .i.u_i�� ► •�'.► .�1• '�! �..ii�.�� ii��.i � i��♦ i ��I�.�.. • ♦�'s�►r�•. � •... ��.�•�l••��.��• -•. • •i�•• l�1��N •1.��.��'L•: ��:.��. �1k ♦d � • fM .aiw j��lr�'. 7 .��..��•....•...•� •��...i�. •N��• ��a.s1��.��! • r � S' l �1 .r,��•.��• ]�• • �i . .��.1��►� �IA� Y,�► !� •�..� .•��►�.�..•i�r��.••....��•.......�...�i.: ` �♦.*.i.�r f.��'�.�.��.{e�..i'.• �A•\�� •�Lls1�.�i..s�t,i � �•�/i�Nl� •��.��•'Y •♦ '•v'....�.•. ` M.� •.�• • •V��a��• •iii.�1�� '� ' •- •� '�� 1�i'I� �M � ��A��r�i��• �.. •��.��. ` �� y�. ��• ♦s is Z'�.��..:.�''S. 1�• • •.i. � ♦-Z! Js. f ¢ •I �,.4�lr.�.��ss.'ss • .�. �.�• •♦'�..a•.W• � •�.• �,r: a•w•' � •�•••1: iw��.�"��r: • �� i��is.i�.l'..i�a�.� •�. � ` � � :�s��.••.... • . ��ut1 �•,a'� 11��1...�r�}��rs��i•• I�� - � 1 ♦�tl-i♦ ♦ i � •�. •...•.•....��.• ` `1�� • •• � •��i��r •��•ts,Mw�� r i••J��• N Y��•; ♦• i •Y'�� Nr µ `:1t. w ��.•.��• 1 -.�•e.►♦ .••••��.•. • �■��.:• IV �• ♦ r� �5��l.ib ♦i� i:��l��Y ��Nt��-! I...i��• _ ��Kei ��N..��i� ��.. ••��..�...•• `r:i �� K•. ♦ • •- •. �s��'.• .w• 1 '� •r►a�� .uY!'K l�� l� • a�! .y• i l� � e ♦ y� ' 1 ��11• wf"W��.�►�r... �`•�• r�V�••��i:i�� ••1�. •• � �s}��y�� ti.•.�I�.�i��K��l ��yJ{t.�i��. f, • uf •�.� �' �:.:.�...� � • .�f ��,��a1Y1•:• � 1 1 , i• •�w1�►t Z�:.�'� -♦ .�,� Iir �1,�.�_Vr3:�t��..y),�'+� Y'�ii��.Y♦ ♦r1�l ��!.r.. • r Y�� • ��I�.•��t.�s� � .�..... �`w= i .��i'� • •��is .�y. tr•"�Z y .� ►�i• �Y=. .�..:iii�i� ♦ • •s�• ' • � T ...••..� �V� '�• . �� ♦ ♦ 1 i��l�'•�.�a.�. `. M��l�� ii��r.��.�ie�'�a'Y♦� •i: i • ii�'��i• 4!��•��.I -•��j:i��f��.:�:�1�' •��a...�.•.� ...:: ..i.•��••... �\.�• M��i►� ��1• •M��. �Y-. �� .li�a�si�' �.�� " • ��1►�Ny�.w• ��.� �y�!is':.w :�_. }�1. r�.�r�� afr�.� ��1 41�.i •• •��:• r.�• �'C�':t�,a�Y�• s• � •r• � �:w A...��.�i� `` - �•\r-� ♦�H�1 1 cir l• .��ri �•,r 2 •�i'•� ♦ ��ti �-v. riD" • ' • M �t�[:w ��1 �� iY� �. •.��aA„��.��i.i.i�.iai '�. l ♦��y�'�'�, ii�� 3��'�'�i�Ja�,��y- �! • aV�� •R`iY� � ♦�� • Z��7��r�� '?!i� �!_4 1Y��. � 's► ✓'�� . •• ia,��i ��Y'� ♦i �i�i�a�� l'KiF�A1 lVJ�'1'�iKi 1 ��i �! 4.a.�� H�f�� •�s NN •�.l�.'r'•' �.�.i�• ♦ ��.arr•• ♦ M►�Zf� }ti � ~�- ) � � �t�� :�.�.�.• r..�•.•• �` ��••��',�a YI �;_ .� 1N •i��. � � �� - i��\i�� ►Y.if � i��• •��'��i• a� L �.��C •�� If�f_��r��iY�' •►��.•��. i+ .•�1 •i�s. ' y�,�� :u'• �' •4�Y.wIi�'�1l�• uii�.�j��1 ; •�es1��?� h �� •�� . �'l�� r•i.• y•��. `��'�l��y. }i��i' .� � ) �� f � I�� ►�ii R ��l'«.�...... `��.i�• •• ti��a LrN��}�il��•.tiu �e�t�?�}��i��Yiuli►iii'i. •ti+C ��•:�iYw•� ��1 HMfZ�� ♦ � �;r'�Jil� �Ki' � �7*'�i�r...l�i•.-.�:.•1�•��•.�.J�■ - .�1�:5 �.a ir Y�)�rl' �♦ M•y�;�/a ��- ��' yy • �l� .� �. s �ft:*i�ti�� • .•l•..J•. •�.•�•.: `w� ��i ��iitl,ii�� lA• � i},+��T ��:��.y�� • .�ei.i�li'��Vw��ur �it'iR 1�J�� 9 �f�i�.�L 1• {:+ � ••��.:��«.��..:��.. : y � � ,� � �. �, ( � • t , � �• �+. . •..�1:: �1:.L - ,.�... AY •��i• t�ir 4� •• �H. '1.N♦�i t�i►�� v ♦ ►" Z �hl��s. � � }�L'�� r��.��'��i��ti♦ ��.�.�. ``'1 L-� t�i.� ! •A! :��•.��i.�1• i�� !b� ,�.ii��a�'� • t�2�.�• •��T'� t ♦ 3i ��` �i ` \ \ ��►�f3.�i�t �.j►��• �. : • .• $�I' s�lY'��a.�,-.r�• ri :��. sr}1 ��r� . ....♦ •.. ♦�•.�r.�.i.. V �. � C }V�Y�G �lY�l� .. •� �r��}' ` � � _r �.�FNIiYL �.• � •�I ��: y :��f• � t �� - •NJ�..�Y��Nii •��'*,� ♦ � .�t1 1 1��: • •1J(�� }�,, .. ,M .��..��. ♦►a.,ir..�..s.� , i0!�+�•. �� .�':..'.. ` `i�. "��...��►••.R . • •e�. � ��•}i�'�.V�' aM��• r.i�.��.��. l• �e�ti•.�•..� •: i �r�.I�il�rr►��.L�' . H: • ..•• ��.��.�.. �`i •�� I��. '•��. � �•w.� _ . � r.• M `' ��i • • •��• } . �1\'.•j.�..�� •.' � ��- '.�•..�...,.•.� ` • �, rti��N �� •��• ��w�� - ' •�� ♦ � �.��NYS♦ 1 �I�iw� 1l• .- � :� ♦. �� V . t •�• ♦.!�•V� � . t��:. } `,.�' •. �. •). .. • .�►�•r�•r �f♦ :��i:i�� t..ti.��►. -��.s ••�t\ii� .�j• •�s.i��.� .w •'s.: T.e �•.� .�• •- . • •�� `` , -•• .r��rYK� r.. •.• l•��.• ♦ r. ��i+��il��'s • �• .;- �i��s�ri�.s►i:i�� iH�r �` � t 1`� �w J1 i:�. ♦.^. ,�1' •.. �.. �. .� `� : � �r �� . �V•��,R• r �.�H�r�� ;�•.�rw . ►� •�»� �ti�1ti {�� i .• •�.•� ♦ � •i�. i �..i ��i��.JyJinl;� • ��.:iY�:'i�iil�w � w�.a �• !„ � ' �i��i�i��l�� • � i:.i. � . ��..�...�•�.•.♦ ` ..�...:...+n -:iS:t�» ��..:t.... .s��.�...:�::..�r',:`:T� ws.r �r.. �y wli.�• ~ � M��• •... .�.` •ru�.a.�� •.�• . •'� i� . • . - i�• � •�• ♦�.•:• •• �.�v ./. • � .� l. .t..�.�...r .,...>�.�. 1 � ��r'� ...�o► ♦�:s.�I• 'a�� .�V� .aii.• ��. .�:�.��• i * '.S• • �� •�.r��►► �N'.�i�. '•.• �.� .��•. ��♦ '�a�i •s��..• ��•. •��•.�1. �:��-.�1,�wr��ra�.♦ � .��.�'�f��.�j•••��. i +� • � � ti ` ��Y , � •1� i t � - 3 �4 ��YdJ� • • _ . ,� •• 1.� Ks i f! ' •• �� ' � �*di ` �`t��•�.• . . •� {:1 a .i�...'.. - r•• fe ?� � -- w..: .:: � L � ��:� ��. s R . }1 � , - �. • .�rw►.i' •.,.. / . •,. N��• �N��Y��• .l.f�♦ I� '��M ♦1� � ��1'Y� •� y ��I��1��• ,1'��• i nl - � . t.��.►Y:S}�li�\'i�si��.. Ni�1Yi��• � ♦a�'��.5• fi Y �t►� ��! K�� •�� ' ♦ �fi� tI •.i•.�1.}�.i��.�L'•�•.��. � ` � .�i:.i}.��.. �N : •..• • '�' •........ . ".....♦. L. � ' _ -'�� S•i. �� : S w.:..... ... . a� �� Yiil�. ��:�►Y � �aWa `• ` ...�. •�... � � ��•� �. ..�. '� .• ` ��.� •l��it ��+y.�i�:.�Y�..ir��...�.•• `. ~� Mwt�N�lii�.ie.ii�::.i:•� s�� fYi •� .n � •r• � ... �.��•.•• - •. • .y� ... « � •.a �: � +i•!')�►��1 ♦i � t»��•�►t•��i ♦ t 1 •�.•.�...��...• •.�� `�:�..Y�.«:i� . • •�•�.•�::�•.��.��.�s.�er�.• s�Y��.r�_•�• '�/_�•� ►�p�� a?' i�� , ��Y�Y�•.��•�� a i�.•.. .........�•. w ��• + � ��rs��i�ii�. � . t l.4��1�� 4 •��N• ♦ y� �1�1�• i /��t47 N • 11��i�• 1 ��.�.�.��.��1 • ` \`.: ri. �..� • �.�� Z� � ••.fi��'r�.��1 .'�. i�. •.1•• M��• �i.1 . •�'�Y�f••��a►�s►��i� t a��K�}�� •��i�a�x�a:i,:�r�' • •...��•••.•�.:.•��:••• `�� l ��N�N •• . l� •��.• �� Hf ►��• �� . i�l��l��'��\GI • 4 � ii jr:rnN ii�. •��•��. - � � ��J . I��♦ t . �• • �.;� � � ��:�� ' : ♦��Ti`/L -R \N��• I�-��1��• ` ` �.�•.• •I� • :�:..'I♦ •• � � . Y• - 1��!• �� +Y/ ��C►� lY� •L' �.�.��..�r��.1�•�71�� . � •i♦ • e�' .•. • ��►' / ��L.. •�11• � l�.i�� r.�,�. � . � 1 � • �L'. \ ��►l.:��.�t �•�:� '��R� if�a. �� .••••.:••....... ` : •� .• � • i' •.• �•...•.►••.._.. .�•. •�••.�•- :. .��..r...�F! •��• )••.►•sti♦ .�i.�•TA�1�• •�.1'.i��s.i•i.• ..•...•.• •....•.• •�....• � ` �' ' � .... . •...s...�..��.. � �•, �.�,�•i .l. •�.�.s -• • �• �• � ' ��.'r�'�i•'•�A �� i:..��.. ' ` �� .� •.�.• •�t.��.�:; �� • (R !.f 1 ).•. ` � � _ � ....� � .��s. ♦ ��' t• •i♦ - .••.a�►ii�...:..,��:�.i�.•::�.�.-:��• .ti ` i� �.• •�....�.i •�►r..:�...��a.i►.•.• ��• • _ ` ��. .�}�. .�.�r.�.��i. •i�� a. ` ::::: _ , . :: :::: � �i : . :;s'•.. .. : ':: :::::::_:: ` -�:�•.�� t�.,... .�►.• •� `-►__' _� ��'��.i:�r� '� .� � ►�' • '�R•��.:�►'s"�.R��.� ` • � a �i�7� �, � i ��Tl�Lv�'r�� •�:1J��7R�•��•'.'•..�.� ` �� r _ ` ��\�� ` .�.J �I!• �' Yr_ � y�� !•�•' ��.� � `�' ___' _ _. •. . '.... ... .'_ � �� ?i'`� �r�i�i• ��♦ .. . .. .._ .�..� ................ .... •♦ • �Y C�i s ! !!l�� Yf� ••1�.•�•�. �'.. r /i:� .. �i��f��M�>}/�'=�y�' i �.� i ��" . ��(�� •l�_►i4'�'�� r�• sM� •f��•'...• 11'i . ' " . ��s. •ss��.� . .. , I I 1 � �:1 1' 1' 1' 1 11 1' 1' I �' 1 1� 1 1:.. ' 1' 1 I 1 1 1 ' 1 ' - - 1 11 1 �� 1= 1' 1 I I• 1 1 �• � � � i � i 1• • �� i• i 1.�. i i .� - - '> �d� �� -- a er — an se City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan I CHAPTER 2— LAND USE 2.0 I�troduction The Land Use chapter serves as the foundation of the Spokane Valley Compre�`�ensive Plan (SVCP) by providing a framework for Spokane Valley's future physical development and by setting forth policy direction for Spokane Valley's current and future land uses. Development of land, according to adopted policies and land use designations discussed in this chapter, sh�uld resutt in an appropriate balance of services, employment, and housing. The land use policies are supplemented by a Comprehensive Plan Map (Map 2.1) that provides a visual illustration of the proposed physical distribution and location of various land uses. This map allocates a supply of land for such uses as retail, office, manufacturin�, public facifities. senrices, e�1��t parks, open space. and housing to meet future demand. 2.1 Plannin� Context State and county land use policies provide a statutory framework for the developmert of City land use policies. It is important to briefly review state and county level polici�s to bettrr unae�stand historical conditions that have shaped the goals and policies in this chapter_ 2.1.1 Growth Management Act The Growth Management Act (GMA) acknawledges that, `�... a lack of common goals expressing the public's interest in conservation and the wise use of our lands pose a threat to the environment, sustainable economic development, and the health, safety and high qualit�r of life enjoyed by residents of this state'.' The GMA provides a framework for content and adoption of loca� comprehensive plans. The GMA provides 14 goals to be, "... used exclusively for the purpose o` guiding development of comprehensive plans and development regulations.° GMA goals pertaining to land use include: • Urban Growth — Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided in an e�cient manner. • Reduce Sprawl — Reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling. low density development. • Housing — Encourage the availability of affordable hous+ng to all economic se�ments of the population of the state, promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage preservation of existing housing stock. • Open Space and Recreation — Encourage the retention of open space and development of recreational opportunities, conserve fish and wildlife habitat, increase access to natural resource lands and water, and develop parks. • Environment — Protect the environment and enhance the state's high quality of life. including air and water quality and the availability of water. • Public Facilities and Services — Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the deve�opment at the time the development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards. • Historic Pneservation — Identify and encourage the preservation of lands, sites, and structures that have historical or archaeological significance. ' Rcw ss.�oao� o Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 1 of 36 City of Spokane Valiey Comprehensive Plan • Property Rights — Private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation having been made. The property rights of landowners shali be protected from arbitrary and discriminatory actions pursuant to state and federal law. The GMA requires that Comprehensive Plan land use elements include the following: • Designate the proposed general distribution, location and extent of the uses of land for housing, commerce, industry, recreation, open spaces, public utilities, public facilities, and other appropriate land uses; • Population densities, building intensities, and estimates of future population growth; • Provide for protection of the quality and quantity of ground water use for public water supplies; • Review drainage, flooding, and stormwater runoff in the area and nearby jurisdictions and provide guidance for corrective actions to mitigate or cleanse those discharges that pollute water of the state. 2.1.2 County Wide Planning Policies The County Wide Planning Policies (CWPPs) required by GMA provide a regional framework to achieve the goals of the GMA. The CWPPs are a refinement of policy direction contained in the GMA and are a resuit of a collaborative process between Spokane County and the cities and towns within the County. The CWPPs provide a policy framework for both the county and its respective cities. Adherence to these policies ensures that plans within the county are consistent with one another. These policies address such issues as the designation of urban growth areas, land use, affordable housing, provision of urban services for future development, transportation, and contiguous and orderly development. The following are specific CWPPs that relate to the Land Use Element Policy Toplc 1- Urban Growth Areas Policies 1. Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) are areas within which urban growth shall be encouraged and outside of which growth can occur oniy if it is not urban in nature. Urban Growth Areas (UGAs} shall include areas and densities sufficient to permit the urban growth that is projected to occur in the county for the succeeding 20-year period `Urban growth' refers to growth that makes intensive use of land for the location of buildings, structures and impermeable surfaces to such a degree as to be incompatible with the primary use of such land for the production of food, other agricuttural products or fiber, or the extraction of mineral resources Urban growth should be located first in areas already characterized by urban growth that have existing public facility and service capacities to serve such development, and second in areas already characterized by urban growth that will be served by a combination of both existing public facilities and services, and any additional needed public facilities and services that are provided by either public or private sources. Further, it is appropriate that urban govemment services be provided by cities, and urban government services should not be provided in rural areas Rural government services may be provided in rural areas. However, Urban Growth Areas may be established independent of incorporated areas. Within these independent Urban Growth Areas (UGAs), urban governmental services may 2 RCW 36.70A.210 ' Note to reader. The tollowing pohdes are numbered according to the policy number In the CWPPs, resulting in non-sequential numbering In this documerit. ` RCW 36,70A.110 s RCW 38.70A.030(17) ° RCW 36.70A.110(3) Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 2 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Pian be provided by other than cities. Some citles may rely on contracts from Spokane County for provision of urban services. Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) include all lands within existing cities, including cities in rural areas. 9. Within Urban Growth Areas (UGAs), lands that fall within planned high-capacit., transportation conidors should be designated for sufficient intens � ; �" � � :' � � _ �_ ' :- := .: ;_ :- _ ��- the economic provision of multimodal transportation. 11. Where applicable, comprehensive plans should contain land use pol�c�es Yrh�ch prov�a� protection for the continued viability of Fairchitd Air Force Base, Spokane Intemational Airport, Felts Field, Deer Park Airport and other publicly owned airports within Spokane County. 12. Jurisdietions should work t�gether to prote�t cri±ical a�eas and ope� space �;ri'hin Ur��r. Growth Areas (UGAs). Policy Topic 2- Jolnt Plannina w=.t�in UGAs Polici��:�. 1 . I � iC �liil l; �,.iiC1: iiiii i� ��.i� U�.CJ.�'. S�I�Jtliu. a. Inciude all jurisdictions edjacent to the Urban Growth A�ea and Special PurpoG�= Districts that will be affected by the eventual transference of governmental senrices; b. Recognize that Urban Growth Areas are potential annexation areas for cities; c. Ensure a smooth transition of services amongst existing municipalities and emerging communities; d. Ensure the ability ;_, _ •, , ., .:..-� �� .. �� L-:' �--� �r- �;� , .,� ,� �� -! _ _ �_� _ : to expansion; and e. Resolve issues regaraing ha��v zor�,ng, �uuci�vis�on and otner iand use �ppruva�s ,�. designated joint planning areas will be coordinated. 2. Joint planning may be accomplished pursuant to an interlocal �7�E�men� �^te�ed i�±�. between and/or among jurisdictions andlor special purpose distric:� Policy Toplc 3- Promotion of Contiguous and Orderty Develo;�rz��r�t �,��c P�O�'iciG o` Uri�: r� Services Policies r J. f1�� U��iSJIC,t�C:ll� 5`.;dl� C:O�`� fl:�i� Nicill� ill�:i Ci:iSSll j. U_,Sl��i'1c::_ 'c:ll:, C'�`Ot`t':�i fl��iUrci fe":SC:I.�CF lands and critical areas. 7. Each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan shall include, at a minimum, the following pol�cies to address adequate fire protection: a. Limit growth to areas served by e fire protec±ion district or within the corporate limits of a city providing its own fire department b. Commercial and residential subdivisions and developments and resident�al pianned unit developments shall include the provision for road access adequate for resid�nis, �re department or district ingress/egress, and water suppfy for fire protection. c. Development in forested areas must provide defensible space between structure and adjacent fuels and require that fire-rated roofing materials be used. 10. Each jurisdiction shall include provisions in its comprehensive plan for equitable distribution of essential public facilities. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use Page 3 of 36 �i�r of S��kane 11�II�y Ga�rnpr�ehen�iive Pi�n "�3. E�,c#� j�risdic#iQn sh�ll �1�� for gr�va�tth r�rithir� UG�s whici� �u�e� I�n�d �ffi�iently�, a�ids c�rtainty to c�pit�l f��ilities pl�nnir�g �nd alCa►� timely �nd �aordi��t�d extensi�n �+f urk��n g�v�mmer�tal services, publi� fa+ci3iti�s and util�#ies f�r n�w tf��l�pm�r�t. ��ch jurisdi�ti�r� sl��f� id�e�tify intern��di�te gcc�wth a��a� �si�c t� t�n ye�r in�r�m�nt�� w'r��in its U(�� a� est�t�li�h p�calicies v�rhic'� �ire�t grcrwtl� c�ns��t�nt with �an�i use an� cap�tal facili#y �lans. P+allcy Topi� � — Parks� a�d �]per� �pace Pc�fi��s �. All js�ri��ct�c�ns s��Id c��p�erat� t� identi�r a�d p�c,tect r�e�ior�al ap�� s�ace I�nds na��ral ,�r��s and �arri��r� �f �nvir�r�mental, t�cr�a�tica�� nd �esthetic significance �� fr�rm � functi�n�fly and p�ysically �conn�cted ��r�t�rn vuhich b�l�nces passive �nd �+c�iv� recr��tior��l uses. ��c'� j�ris�lictivn shalG ide�ti#y �pen �pac� cvr�id�rs within ��d b�tw+�n urb�n gr�rnrth are�s. All jurisdic#ions s'�a11 `�ientif�r i�rnpl�men�tat�on, m��rr��erat, pres�rvatia� �n�d cc�ns�rva#i�n str�k�gie� thraugh bath r�e�ul�tor�r �nd nc�n-r�gu9att�ry te��r�iqu�s, ta prot� ic��nt�ed land� and corridor� t� ��t�in t�err a��r� spa�ce ber��fits an�d fune#ion�. ir�p��m�nt�tion �nd rr�ar��g�ment str�t�gi�� hc�ul� includ� �Ilabcar�tia�n �nd coc��dinati�n wi�h ��nd ��u�t� and ��h�er I�nd p�e��nrat��an �rg�r�i�at��i�s. �. Ea�h juri��i��ion sh�ll requir� th�$ �iev�laprn�nt �of ��ks ar�d v�er� spa�� s � r��an� to bal�n�c� #he irnpa�t� a��ci�#�d w�� h��her�l�nsity develapr��nt. 5. �ac#� jur�sdb�t�an sh��l m�ke ap�rc��riate pra+vis�an� ��r patks �nd re�re�t+�r� �r�as. i�t�1i�y'T�p�� 5 •�r°�n��c�rt�tic�n F'Qlicie� 5: Lc�cai juri�di�ti�ns �hali d�v�Sa� an� ��3��t la�d use pi�ns #h�t have b�er� c�ordznat�d t�r�ugh th�+e ��k��e Regi�on�l Trar��po�t�t�c�n Cauncil ��RT�� t�a �n��ure t��t they pr�s�r+v� �nd �n1��n�e t�� re�i�� trar�sp�rka�ior� s�r�t+em. The��e plar�s r�r�y i�c�ud� hic�i�-��pac�t�r transp�rt�tia�r� c��rFdvr� �and shal� #�lfill air q;uality c�orsf�rrri�t�+ �nd fir�anc��l requir�men�ts o� F�d�r�l Tr�nsp�r��t�c�n L�w� �n� R�gula��c�ns, th� �l�an l��r Ac� �rn�ndment� af 1��, a�d tFae �G�A. �. �+a�l �urisd�ct��r�� t�all d�s�gnat+� wi#hin I�n�d u�� pl�ns �r��s th��t c�n supp�rt pu��i� tra�s�ort�t��on serv�ices, T�es� ane�� hall �c�c�ude existin� a� �vel� a� ra�w c��velc�prrter�t. ��ch jur��di�ti��'s land u�e �la�, th� F�gi�n�l trans,�c��t�tic�� lan ��d th� ��kan+� Tr�n�it �uthvr�t�'� ��"�) La�g Rang+� 'Tr�r�sit Pl�n �h�ll supp��t, +cc�mp��n��t �nd k�� onsis#��t with ea�ch �ath�r. 1'I, ��c� j�rE�dicti�r� s1��ll a�ddre�� I��d u�� +�esign�tkar�� and si�e desic�n requirerr�ents� t1�at are suppc��tive t�� a�d +�ornp�tibl� �v�►'itf� �ubl��c tr`�n�p�rt�tion, f�r ex�mpl�: �. ��d�str'iarr-sc�� neigh�arhoads a�d �ct�v�ty ��r�ters; '�. rnixed-us� d�v��oprne�t; and c, p�d�e�t�iar� fri�nd�y �r�d non-mc�tc�rize� d��E�n, Pc�li�y'�+�pic �' �- �#ffc�r�ah�� Haus�r�� 9i�i�s 2. Ea�� j�risdick3�r�"s �d�vel�pm��t pc�lici�s, regu1�tu�ns �r��d stan�l�rds �h�uld �rrovad� for the �ip�o�#ur��#y t+� �re��e �'�ardabl� F�ausing in its cvr�m�nity. ��h p�li�ci�� m�y �ncl�� f�'C�II�c�I�CF�+' 1�CI�p��, SU��7 �S ffIC�USI�?�1�6]rF Z(l�If1�C�� 1'�'f�DRTl�fl�+��lffl'1��C� Zt]fi1l1C,�, C�'ll�C�+�-li�� i�ve1apm�nt and ir�c�nti�res f�r i�rc�€�asing d�nsit� ta pr�rnot� gr�at�� chvice �r�d �f#o�dal�fe '��usi�� n� its caanmur�ity. A,dvpt�d April 25, �f14� �Up�a�e� �r31-20�8} Cfi�ap�er �� L��d �s� P�g� � �f 3� City Of SDOka!'i2 V�:I!ey Comprehens�ve Plan 6. In con�unct�on with other policy topics, coordinate housing, transportat�on and economic development strategies to ensure that sufficient land and densities for affordable housing are provided in locations readily accessible to employment centFr� 2.2 Land Use Plan Spokane Valley's ,a� us� pc►tcrn ��r;e p►�ys��ai ioca,;ur� ui us�s, cx�s�s a5 � r�su�: �� d�:vciupr��ec administered by Spokane County until incorporation of Spokane Valley on March 31, 2003 and to e far lesser e�ent the subsequent development under Spokane Valley's jurisdiction. As shown in Figure 2.1 below, the majority of land is designated residential (57%) under this Plan. Of the land designated residential, 50% is designated as Low Density Residential with densities up to six dwelling units per acre. Nearly 20% of the land area is designated as Heavy and Light Indust�ial. The remaining land is designated as commercial, office, or publicJquasf public. Comprehensive Plan Designations - Land PublrJt]uas�-Public Area ParklOpen Spaoe 79b C�r Cenle� Comnuni� Cortm�l 396 Regional Commerd� ��' 2 �� N �� p�_ 396 Corridar Mixed Uae � 396 Cormierdal 2 �D \ ��, �'� '�� Og6 ` -� ` . _ � Heavy Industial `'? 14% Mixed Use�. � � 3°� / � � ��ti_ � � HDR MDR �\ 3% 4 � Llghl Industie) � 5°�6 50°�6 Ffgure 2.1: Land Use by Comprehensive Plan Category 2.2.1 City Center Plan This scenario presents concepts and str�tegies for creating a definable and vibrant "City Center° for the City of Spokane Valley. The purposes of creating a Spokane Valley City Center are: 1. Create an identifiable city center that is a social and economic focus of the City; 2. Strengthen the City overall by providing for long-term growth in employrnent and housing; 3. Promote housing opportunities close to employment and services; 4. Develop land use pattems that support the development of a more extensive regional transportation system, whatever the ultimate configuration may be; 5. Reduce dependency on automobiles; 6. Consume less land with urban development; 7. Maximize the public investment in infrastructure and services; 8. Provide a central gathering place for the community; and 9. Improve the quality of design for development throughout the City. There ere several reasons why a definable, vital City Center is importarrt to Spokane Valley's future. These include: Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 5 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 1. The development of a more intensive, multi-use city center is a natural step in Spokane Valley's evolution. Most new urban areas sta�t out as bedroom communities. Retail and commercial uses then develop to serve the new residential population. Office and industrial activities next begin to locate at key transportation crossroads, adding jobs and strengthening the employment base. Spokane Valley has experienced these evolutionary phases and is now ready for a defined City Center. 2. Economic Development — Spokane Valley has an opportunity to transform itself from an essentially residential community with retail and service based economy to a sub-regional economic center with an expanded, more diverse employment base. 3. Community Support — A survey of Spokane Valley area citizens prior to incorporation overwhelmingly indicated that the lack of identifiable °downtown" and a community gathering place was of concern to a majority of respondents. Community support was tested again when the city conducted a statistically valid survey in the spring of 2004. The support to create a City Center was reiterated throughout the community meetings held during the development of the comprehensive plan and the city's informal community survey. A discussion of the results of the city's survey is included in Section 2.10. The following could be components of the City Center: 1. Location: Generally located along the SpraguelAppleway corridor. 2. Size: Between 300 and 400 acres in size. 3. Streets: New streets could be added at every 200 to 400 feet to create an internal grid street system to provide an urban atmosphere. 4. On-street parking would be provided on intemal grid streets. 5. Ground floor retail on both sides of streets. 6. Building out to the edge of the right-of-way and include wide sidewalks to encourage a lively street scene. 7. Office/Employment uses provided in high visibility locations with adequate parking and adjacent to pleasant surroundings such as open space, retail shops and services. 8. Multi family housing that is safe, secure, and located so that it is buffered ftom traffic noise and provides a pedestrian friendly streetscape with connections to parks, schools, shopping, services and transit. 9. Civic/public uses such as city hall, community library, performing arts center, city center paric, green space or other public uses that would attract people to downtown over an extended portion of the day. Other characteristics of this land use scenario include the following: 1. Neighborhood/community retail centers - current land use pattems dictate that residents travel to the Sprague Avenue corridor to access some of the most basic goods and services. This scenario would provide for smaller scale, less intensive retaiVcommercial centers in the south end and northeast portions of the city. Potential locations for these centers would be focused at intersections of arterials at the periphery of the city, such as Highway 27/32`� Avenue, Dishman Mica RoadlBowdish Road and Barker RoadlBoone Avenue. 2. Office zoning districts — currently, there is no specific zoning district or comprehensive plan designation for professional office uses. The county has used the UR-22, Multi-family zoning district as its office district, which has resulted in a number of issues related to rezones and appropriate development standards. Areas that are currently developed in predominantly office uses would be re-designated to an "Office' comprehensive plan designation and zoning districts developed to implement this plan designation would include development standards to implement the policies of the comprehensive plan. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 6 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Pian Spec�c areas in the city include the Evergreen corridor north of Sprague Avenue; Mission east of Pines Road in the Valley HospitaUmedical office area; near the intersection of Pines Road and Broadway; and other areas identified through the land use inventory process. 3. "Auto-Rov�l' Overlay — The city has several new auto dealerships located along Sprague Avenue. The majority of these dealerships are located between Argonne Road and Thierman Road. Two dealerships are located just west of Dartmouth Road, near the U-City Mall. Ne�w car dealerships provide the city with substantial sales tax revenue on one hand, on the other hand auto dealerships can have a significant visual impact on a community and have somewhat unique needs related to development standards, such as signage and street frontage landscaping. This scenario recognizes these circumstances and designates the areas identified above appropriately, and provides policy direction for the implementing development regulations. 4. Mixed-use — this scenario suggests reducing the strip commercial on Sprague Avenue by maintaining Community Commercial zoning onfy at major intersections such as Pines. Evergreen and Sullivan Roads. Areas in between these commercial "nodes' would be designated as Corridor Mixed-use or some other appropriate designation, which would encourage conversion of these vacant and/or dilapidated comme�cial areas into areas af office/employment, residential and specialty retail. 5. Industrial areas would not be significantly char��d or �!:�r;;d ur��•;:� t� o� uny a:n�� scenario. Permitted uses and development standards would be reviewed for 8P�(C�''i2i�"u5S cn� Chc''.f1��S ��O��S�� f)��t� Cfl �''^�i��l C�l��il0� Of th? CORlnr��!l�i`,r. pla�, 6. ThE majority oi land in ti�e C�ty of SpokGne V�Iley is dcdicated to si;�gle fGr��iiy r�sident�a'� zoning and land use. The majority of the single family residential areas are designated Lov�. Density Residential under the interim comprehensive plan. This plan designation allows fo � residential densities from one to six dwelling units per acre. Under this scenario, thr� existing single family residential zoning districts wrould be evaluated, and a series of singlr family districts with minimum lot sizes ranging from 7,000 to 10,000 square feet would b� considered. Reducing overall lot sizes would enable the city to maintain its existing singl� �i.�-I r f `�� , _ , ^ ,,,, --• _ },,� family character, and minimize land nee __ f_� ,.�'t;- _:r��,;� ,.� _ t�� .:,�c-� �_�{�.._ � city's 20 year population growth projectio�� 7. Areas previously platted in 1+/- acre Iots —�I I�ere are areas in tne City ti�at 4ve+�e piatze� �� approximately one acre lots. These areas would be rezoned to en R-1 zoning designatio� with the intent to preseroe the original intent of the zoning for these areas. Moreover, thest areas would be allowed to maintain a small number of livestock such as horses, cows, or Ilamas in keeping with the rural character of these neighborhoods. 2.3 Relatlonshla to Other Comarehensive Plan Chaaters The land use concept set forth in this chapter is consistent with all SVCP chapters. Intemal consistency among the chapters of the SVCP translates into coordinated growth and an efficient use of limited resources. Below is a brie` discussion af ho��v the Land Use chapter re�a!es to the other chapters of the SVCP. 2.3.1 Economic Development Spokane Valley's economy is disproportionately divided. Dr. Grant Forsyth, Assistant Professor of Economics at Eastem Washington Unive�sity prepared a report based on year 2000 Census information for the Spokane Valley area. This report, 'A Demographic and Economic Analysis fo� the City of Spokane Valley" indicates that there were nearly 3,000 employer finns employing approximately 43,305 people in the year 2000 with an average annual payroll per employee of approximately $29,00� (in 2000 dollars). Dependence on retail trade and service occupations stems primarily from the City's evolution into a regional shopping destination for eastem and southem Spokane County and counties in northem Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 7 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Idaho. Increased regional competition from other retail areas, such as Post Fa11s and Coeur d'Alene and the City of Spokane, may impact the City's ability to capture future retail dollars. To improve Spokane Valley's economic outlook, the economic development strategy is to promote a more diverse economy. A diversified economy would achieve a better balance between jobs and housing and support the City's desired quality of life. In conjunction with the Economic Development chapter, this Land Use chapter promotes the following: 1. A City Center composed of mid-rise office buildings, mixed-use retail, and housing. 2. Redevelopment and development of the Sprague AvenuelAppleway Boulevard corridor into en area of quality commercial and Mixed-use development. 3. Establishment of design standards. 4. Preservation of existing single family neighborhoods. The land use map designations support development necessary to achieve the above (see the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map 2.1). A complete discussion of economic development is set forth in the Economic Development chapter. 2.3.2 Capital Facllities Capital facilities provided by the City include: transportation and streets, parks and open space, and surface water management. The amount and availability of urban services and infrastructure influences the location and pace of future growth. The City is responsible for the construction and maintenance of parks and recreation facilities, streets and transportation improvements, and surface water facilities. Providing for future growth while maintaining existing improvements depends upon the community's willingness to pay for the construction and financing of new facilities and the maintenance of existing facilities. As outlined in the Capital Facilities Plan, new infrastructure and services may be �nanced by impact fees, grants, designated capital taxes (real estate excise tax, fuel tax, utility tax), money from the City's general fund or voter approved bonds. To capitalize on the City's available resources for urban services and infrastructure, this Land Use chapter recognizes that concentrating growth is far more cost effective than allowing continued urban sprawl. Concentrating growth also supparts the enhancement of future transit improvements. Annexation of Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) to the Citv of Spokane Valley may be a loqtcal aro�ression to ensure centralized alanning end prevention of urban s�rawl. A maior goal of the GMA is to reduce urban sprawl by �ncouraging develonment in urban areas where adeauate �ublic facilities exist. GMA further states, that cities are the logical provider of urban government services. Prior to annexation, the City of Suokane Va11ey will consider the economic impacts of �rovidinQ municipal services at a(evel consistent with other areas within the City. The City will not �,rovide a Iower level of service in areas beinQ considered for annexation that were in existence in the proposed ereas at the time immediatelv preceding the annexation process. The City will consider PAAs' topouraphy, land utilization, and ooQUlation densitv when determining service levels. Water Availability — Potable water is provided to residents of Spokane Valley by thirteen water and irrigation districts. All drinking water used by residents in Spokane Valley is drawn frorn the Spokane Valley/Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer. Water Quality - Maintaining a clean source of water is vital to the heafth and livability of the City. Preserving water quality ensures a clean source of drinking water and continued heaith of the City's streams and lakes. Maintaining water qual'rty is also impo�tant for maintaining the heafth of the aquifer that relies on surface water for recharge. , Contamination of an aquifer by contaminated surface water can lead to serious health concerns and/or expensive treatment requirements. To address this concern and impacts of new development, the City has adopted a Stormwater Management Plan. The plan specifies actions to ensure water, quality including the development of detentioNretention facilities to control rate and Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 8 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensiv� Plan quality of water runoff. Furthermore, development of a wellhead protection program with the various water providers should provide guidelines to avoid possibfe contamination. Policies contained in the Natural Environment chapter provide direction for development near wellheads and in aquifer recharge areas. For a complete discussion of wate �P,�OLlrrac a �-3 ��,�t� purveyors in the City of Spokane Valley, refer to the Capital Facilities chapter 2.3.3 Parks and Open Space One of the most important and valued elemer�ts of a high quality living and working environment i< e parks and open space system. Providing parks and open spaces contributes to a reduction ir. environmental impacts such as noise and air pollution; increases the value of adjacent prope�ties. provides ereas for passive and active recreation; and helps preserve the natural beauty of the City. 2.3.4 Natural Environment Spokane Valley's natural beauty is apparent. Streams, wetlancis, surr�unaing moun►a�ns and ti��c Spokane River provide a scenic backdrop as well as e source for active and passive recreation fo� the citizens of Spokane Valley. The Land Use chapter seeks to protect Spokane Valley's uniqu� natural resources through policies that support the preservation of these areas for futurr generations. The Natural Environment chapter also includes a discussion of critical areas a� defined by GMA. For a complete discussion, please refer to the Natural Environment chapter. 2.3.5 Housing Housing is a basic human need and a major factor in the quality of life for individuals and families. An adequate supply of affordable, attractive, and functional housing is fundamental to achieving a sense of community. The central issue related to land use is supplying enough land to accommodate projected growth for a range of incomes and households. Presently, housing is provided primarily in single-family subdivisions. This plan sets forth strategies to increase housing options and choices. The Land Use chapter advocates changes to current development codes to increase flexibility in platting land and encourage housing as part of mixed-use developments in commercial areas. The latter provides an opportunity to locate housing closer to employment and shopping, and to create affordable housing. A complete discussion of housing can be found in the Housing chapter. Z.4 Potential Annexatlon Areas 2.4.1 Projected Growth -- In October 2003, the City of Spokane CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Valley received a 2000 population POPULATION ESTIMATES certification from the U.S. Census �$o,oao � Bureau that indicated 80,927 people called Spokane Valley home on April �4o,oao 1, 2000. As of April 1, 20�3 the �so,000 population had grown to 82,005 12o,00a (based on the Washington State Office of Financial Management >>o,000 (OFM) population estimates). Upon �oo,000 incorporation on March 31, 2003, the 90,000 City of Spokane Valley became the 8 � � , state's ninth largest city and second la�gest in Spokane County. �o��o �b,��h,��o, �0��0� Spokane Valley received an OFM population estimate for April 1, 2004 P°Pubtion: AcWWEstimate of 83,950. This new population Papubtbn Ettimste: 1 .6� c.owrh Rae estimate moved Spokane Valley from Papulation Estimsle: T.S'�i arowth Rate the state's ninth largest city to the - - - Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Us.- Page 9 of ��^� City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan state's eighth largest city. The 2004 population estimate reflects an annual increase of approximately 2.4 percent over the city's 2003 population estimate. The most recent OFM estimate � for Spokane Valley is 88,�€8-920 as of April 1, �2008. This figure represents an annual growth rate of approximately 1.5 percent. The average annual growth rate is approximatefy 1.91 % over I the 4 year period from 2003 to 2007. Future population growth is forecasted at the state and county level by OFM. This future population growth was distributed between jurisdictions and unincorporated Spokane County through a methodology prepared by the Spokane County Steering Committee of Elected Officials (SCEO). The City of Spokane Valley was not allocated population growth originally because the City had not been incorporated when this action took place. However, the County did allocate population to the "Spokane Valley IUGA", which includes the new cities of Spokane Valley and Liberty Lake. This process resulted in a popu{ation growth allocation of 39,431 to the Spokane Valley IUGA. This IUGA also includes areas within the UGA that are still in unincorporated Spokane County. The graph above indicates Spokane Valley's 20 year population using a 1.5% and 2.5% annual growth rate. Using the 1.5% annual growth rate, which is consistent with past estimated growth rates in the Spokane Valley area, the estimated 2025 population of Spokane Valley is 114,765 or an increase of 3�,815 persons. The 2.5% annual growth rate results in a 2025 population of 141,011, an increase of 57,061. Spokane Valley proposed a population allocation of 20,666 to the SCEO based on the regional land capacity methodology. This request was proposed as an °interim' request based on the land/population capacity within the existing corporate boundaries of Spokane Valley. The reason for this request was based on the significant issues related to waste water treatment capacity. Once the waste water issues have been resolved, Spokane Valley will prepare a revision to the population allocation and present this information to the SCEO. This issue is discussed in more detail below. The Spokane County Board of County Commissioners (BoCC) approved this population allocation in November 2004. The City has continued to refine the population projections based on the preceding information. At a Cit�r Council retreat held on February 11, 2006, the City Council directed staff to utilize a 1.89% annual growth rate for purposes of population forecasting. This resutted in a 20 year population forecast of 38,614 persons. This information was presented to the SCEO on February 15, 2006 when the Cit�r officially requested a 20 year population allocation of 38,614 for planning purposes. In 2006 the BoCC app�oved via Resolution 06-0438 a population allocation of 33,125 for Spokane Valley for planning purposes. 2.4.2 Land Capaclty Analysis The GMA does not require a Population and Land Capacity Element to be included in the comprehensive plan. However, GMA does require that Land Use, Housing and Capital Facilities Elements include population densities, building intensities and estimates of future population growth. The GMA also requires a Land Capacity Analysis, or the theoretical holding capacity of the designated Urban Growth Areas, which by definition includes cities. By assigning the expected population growth to the results of the Land Capacity Analysis, the area required to accommodate the population growth is shaped. Countywide population forecasts are identified by the CWPPs, as one criterion for consideration in developing a regional methodology or countywide population allocation. The countywide growth target is based on the OFM growth management population forecast for Spokane County. The Land Quantity Analysis Methodology for Spokane County was developed through the efforts of the Land Quantity Technical Committee between March 1995 and October 1995. The Growth Management Steering Committee of Elected Officials adopted that methodology on November 3, 1995. The adopted methodology is patterned after the Washington State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development's (CTED) land quantity inventory guidebook entitled Issues in Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 10 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Designating Urban Growth Areas Part I- Providing Adequate Urban Area Land Supply. Use of that document was specified by the adopted Countywide Planning Policies (Policy Topic 1(Urban Growth Areas Policy #3). However, the step-by-step CTED process was modified somewhat by the I Land Quantity Technical Committee to reflect unique circumstances in Spokane County. The following steps of the regional methadology were followed by Spokane Valley in conducting the land capacity analysis: 1. Identify lands tha� are potential candidates to accommodate future growth - vacant, partialty and under lanci (in at}�er worcis suhtrac't a!f �arce!s comr:;i,ted to other uses) 2. Subtrect all p�rc�,s tha; the comn�u,i{ty a°r�nes as not dev�lopable because of phys�caf limitation. 3. Subtract lands that will be need�c for other public purposes. 4. Subtract all parcels that the community determines are not suitable for development fer social and economic reasons. 5. Subtract that percentage of land that the commLnity assum�s �vill not be available for develOpment Within the commurit�.� nlan's ?0 tim� fr��m� 6. Build in a safety factor 7. Determine total capac �, Spokane Velley prepared a land � � � - - ` �� - �.. �� , � . ' _ . . � 'vGrJ:...�ly' Glld,jJlJ lJ� t�iG l,l.� c.ilu iJui��iiii� v�7�"�� C.::�`�'v Ji. t�� above regional methodology. �-a� � � ea-� ` '��a #�s--bee�-��ed--#� . - S�E�A-e�-�-ie-2�-a��ly-�8,-��3 ` '' ��►��-a�c�a` ' ��ese�- The results of the land capacity analysis are contained in the table below: Table 2.1 Spokane Valley UGA Land Capacity Analysis u da �#y-��= 12�05�05) Vacant and Net Developable Pot�ntfal New Populatlon � Area P�� Acres Dwollin� UniLs Ca�city � Spoknne Valley c,?r'� 1 2��3 7.��33 1;�`U I (Incorp orated Area) _ - — — i Northeast r � _ �` � _ � 1 — -- � I Northwood J� I � / 7 ', �.416 i East I � � 14i — � � _ �,� i - so�� I 2� � : _ a�? so�tr -- - � _ .� _ � - _ -- ,.oe� _ i _�.�Zz Ponderosa � Z� � ?� Ed eclfftlDbhman - - - - - � � ! 1.�19 g _ ]� � _ 1�Z _ - TOTA � % �r� ? Q� 1?_5 � 2 R 4 3? SP(7h�a;l; ��a��:.y' fi::,C.�fll(?iC"�U�'.�.+ tC t.'l�'. .SiF-;,'t L.Ofil"liiiC;. i':l�:t D!:�t!i tr?C C;Ij Uf S�v�;c":"iC �.�2'll..;� �"�i�: the City of Liberty Lake receive an interim population allocation that could be accommodated withir� the existing city limits of each city. The rationale for this recommendatian was based on tr� situation regarding sanitary sewer throughout the entire Spokane region It is estimated that the Spokane County treatrnent plant will run out of capacity in 200� ar�d the Liberty Lake Water 8� Sewer District treatment capability is currently at or near capacity. Permits to expand the Spokane County and Liberty Lake plants from the Washington State Department af Ecology and the Environmental Protection Agency are currentfy in doubt. Given the potentia� constraint for both jurisdictions to provide this vital urban service, the Steering Committee forwarded a recommendation to the Spokane County Board of County Commissioners to allocate Adopted April 25, 200fi (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use Page 11 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan only the population that could be accommodated within existing city limits until such time as the sanitary sewer issues are resolved. 2.4.3 Potential Annexation Areas The purpose of this section is to identify the unincorporated areas within the existing Spokane County UGA that are adjacent to the City of Spokane Valley, which would comprise potential annexation areas for the City. Map 2.2 indicates potential annexation areas (PAAs) for the City of Spokane Valley. Spokane County adopted its first comprehensive plan developed under GMA in 2001. A complete examination of urban services was required at the time the County established the UGA, moreover, Spokane County was obligated to comply with the State Environmental Policy Act. The County's plan included the designation of a regional UGA, which included the still unincorporated area of Spokane Valley. The County utilized the SEPA/GMA integration process to fulfill the environmental review requirements of the plan including the designated UGA. When Liberty Lake incorporated in 2001 and Spokane Valley incorporated in 2003 much of the "Valley UGA° was included as part of the newly created cities, but not all. In 2003 and again in 2006, Liberty Lake completed annexations totaling 975.69 acres of the County designated UGA. These annexations resulted in a nearly 34 percent increase (from 4.5 square miles to just over 6 square miles) in land area for Liberty Leke. As Table 2.1 indicates there are a number of unincorporated UGAs adjacent to Spokane Valley. Several of these UGAs are only contiguous to Spokane Valley (south, southeast, and northeast) and would be logical areas for future annexation to the City of Spokane Valley. Spokane County and the metro cities of Spokane Valley, Spokane, Liberty Lake and Airvvay Heights have begun the process of updating the regional UGA consistent with the county wide planning policies (CWPPs). Through this process, the City of Spokane Valley will identify areas needed to accommodate allocated population growth by re-evaluating land quantity analysis and urban service delivery. 2.4.4 Develonment of Goals, Policies. and Actions for Annexatlon The Growth Management Act (GMAI re4uires co�nties to desiqnate Urban Growth Area (UGAs) within which urban qrowth shall be encouraQed RCW 36.70A.110 (1). UGAs are to include sufficient land to accomrnodate the twentv-vear populatiqn growth proiected for the countv. The GMA im�oses planninQ reQuirements to influence the ability of a city to annex UGAs. A citv is reauired bv GMA to adopt policies for land use, housing, capital facilities, utilities, and �ransportation within the citv's UGA. In order to meet this requirement the Citv of Spokane Vallev has developed policies and goals to provide uolicv guidance for annexation of territory within UGAs Annexation will have financial imQacts on the city it maY be oositive or neaative The CitY rnaY need to develop an annexation studv to essess the financial impacts esaecially for lamer annexations. The Capital Facilities chapter identifies cuRent service provide�s within the Potential Annexation Areas �PAAs) as a starting ooint for the detailed analvsis that may be needed prior to annexation. „_. . .r _ i_ ' 2.6 Land Use Desi�nations ._�.�. The land use designations in the SVCP recognize the ��` "�,,, �� ' ::� '� , � „ i" ' . �� relationships between broad pattems of land uses. ._ ��' �+'� �•=� The designations set forth locational criteria for each �. -� - ' - •; i•�: e � � ,_ , ; , ,. �•�}�,;;w��;:: . �. ; �; � '{' -4- . ♦- �ti specific class of uses consistent with the long-term =� �-�``�y •'�''" `�: �- 't' ob'ectives of the SVCP. These desi nations rovide - ''' `~�� t�� .,� �'> �; 1 9 p � -;:�,,;� , : ! � , . the ur ose and intent for s ec�c zonin distriCts. ,,� - b� r ;,�,�. �.�� _,.: �r, P P P 9 - ��, . w , �►,,��;�.: :,� ,_ _ • � The location of the comprehensive plan land use _�:, - - , -:-Y ` --� �'�.�-� .;�- � designations are shown on the Comprehensive Plan .; ` Land Use Map (Map 2.1). Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 12 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 2.6.1 Residential The demand for and development of single-famity housing is expected to continue for the foreseeable future. Single-family development will occur as in-fill development of vacant or under developed lots scattered throughout existing neighborhoods, and as subdivisions on vacant tracts of land. To address future housing needs, the Land Use chapter encourages new iechniques for developing single-family housing. Such techniques include clustering, planned unit developments. lot size averaging, zero lat line develooment accessory dwellinp units and special needs housirc Low Density Resldentia+ The Low Density Resideniial (LDR) Comprenensive Pian designatian aaciresses a rar�gE of s�ngl�: family residential densities from one dwelfing unit per acre up to and including six dwelling units pe- acre. This designation would be implemented through a series of zoning designations as describec below. Implemertting zoning for the LDR designation will include a series of zones allowing a range of minimum lot sizes. Existing lot sizes and community character � t. -- �� '� -- will be strongly considered when - ---�-- developing the City's zoning map. For - -�� example, areas such as Rotchford Acres , '� J and Ponderosa will likely require minimum _ �; lot sizes close to an acre in size. These �_ large lot developments currently allow for __ horses and other large animals and have a distinct character that should be preserved _ to the greatest extent possible. The ��-�_ '� majority of the LDR designation will provide for densities ranging from four to • six dwelling units per acre. Typical lot sizes will range from 7,000 to 10,000 square feet. Some a�eas designated as LDR still lac��. necessary urban services and infrastructure, mainly sanitary sewer facilities. Upon provision r�` urban services, such as water and sewer, and transit services, an increase in density in some area=: may be warranted. However, the City will adopt strict criteria to evaluate 7 ��,, �� ch � r �� s t�� r� �_� rc- that future development is cor�:��'�h!.� �,•, �`},� !`�.- -,,�,�-�,��+��; r �-'�h�-��,�`' ^ ��'• �, Medium Densfty Resldentlal The Medium Density Residential designation represents an opportunity to provide a range c�� housing types to accommodate anticipated residential growth. The increase in population, declir�� in average family size, and increased cost of single-family homes have created increased demanu for new housing types. The Land Use chapter encourages the development of housing types, sucr as duplexes, townhouses, and condominiums ir, existing multi-family areas and within mixed-us� development in commercial area s Mult't uses, in large part, are in G��GS curren,�y z�ned for mui;ip�e-fa�7�.ily ci�v�l�pm�nt. Zoning will allow densities up to 12 dwelling units per acre in the Medi�m Density Residential designation. Opportunities for new de�.�elopment will occur throuah redevelopment and build-out of remaining parcels. Multi family residential zones s��ould be used as transitional zoning betwe�n higher intensi;y land uses such as commercial and office, to lower density single family neighborhoods. Additionally, Medium Density Residential areas should be located near services and high capac+ty transit facilities or transit routes. Residential design guidelines thet eddress design and appearance of multiple-family developments should be considered. The primary goal of residential design guidelines is to develop muitiple family housing that is reflective of the community's character and appearance. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use Page 13 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan High Density Residential This designation provides for existing multi-family residential development developed at a density in excess of 12 units per ecre. Additionally, High Density Residential (HDR) designated areas are also located in areas near higher intensity development, such as a City Center. HDR provides housing opportunities for younger, lower income households in the City who may not yet be able to afford a home of their own. Moreover, this designation provides housing options for people looking to "downsize" from a single family dwelling on an individual lot, or for those known as °empty- nesters° whose children have moved out of the household and a large single family home is no longer needed. Generalty, this designation is appropriate for land which is located adjacent to the arterial street system served by public transit, and is in close proximity to business and commercial centers. 2.6.2 Commercial Designations Existing commercial areas are euto-oriented and characterized by one-story low intensity development. In the future, these areas will become more intensively develaped and pedestrian oriented, and in some designations, accommodate housing. Transforming existing areas into places where people want to live, shop, and work requires changes. Commercial areas should contain street fumiture, trees, pedestrian shefters, well marlced crosswalks, and buildings oriented to and along the street to provide interest and allow easy pedestrian access. Regfonal Commercial � � The Regional Commercial ' � � designation encompasses two major �,_-�� retail areas of the City. tt covers the �!!, -eR� , °strip" retail areas along Sprague '� _ • � �� _ . �� •, Avenue which includes the � automobile dealerships located along --� ' ` � � � , ' .,��,� =. the westem end of the Sprague _ • � Avenue corridor and the "big box" � ! `� �^ � � ' �"'" � l � ' l�y j S�` �- retail area found in the Sullivan Road --`-=� - �� -�'�' _�_., _ �: area from Sprague Avenue north to �;�-, - ' � the Interstate 90 interchange, and " includes the Valley Mall and Wal- =� �; .. Mart. Regional Commercial allows 2 _} _ __ ,- large range of uses. A wide range of development types, appearance, ages, function, and scale can be found along Sprague Avenue. Older, single-story developments provide excellent opportunities for redevelopment. To create retail areas that are aesthetically and functionally attractive, revised development standards should be applied through Regiona� Commercial zoning, along with the adoption of Community Design Guidelines which address design quality, mixed-use, and the integration of auto, pedestrian, and transit circulation. Site design, modulation, and setback requirements are also addressed. � ��,�ur� �,�� . , ,. Community Commercial � �_ - The community commercial classification -____ _;_, � _ �' �- designates areas for retail, service and office �- _ _ - establishments intended to serve several neighbofioods. Community Commercial areas should not be larger than 15-17 acres in size and :�,��,,�,�, ,,,`�, �� -::�� I'�� ` u should be located as business clusters rather • •° than arterial strip commercial development. � � Community Commercial centers may be Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use Page 14 of 36 City of Spokane Vailey Comprehensive Plan designated through the adoption of the c.omprehensive plan, comprehensive plan amendments or through sub-area planning. Residences in conjunction with business andlor multifamily developments may be allowed with performance standards that ensure compatibility. In addition, light assembly or other unobtrusive uses not traditionally located in commercial zones may be allowed with appropriate performance standards to ensure compatibility with surrounding uses or zoning districts. Neighbofiood Commerclal The neighbofiood commercial classification designates areas for small-scale neighborhoods serving retail and office uses. Neighborhood business areas should not be larger than two acres in size, and should be located as business clusters rather than arterial strip commercial developments. Neighborhood business centers may be designated through the adoption of the comprehensive plan, comprehensive plan amendments or through neighborfiood plans. Auto-Row Overtay The City of Spokane Valley is home to several major new automobile dealerships. While these land uses provide a positive economic impact on the community, they can also have less positive impacts on the aesthetics of the community. Auto dealerships typically have vast ereas of pavement to store new and used vehicles for sale. These land uses also have unique requirements for landscaping and signage. Unlike many commercial uses whose stock in trade is contained within a building, it is necessary for auto dealerships to have their vehicles clearfy visible from the street. This makes traditional street side landscaping (consisting of low growing shrubs and bushes, and trees) not viable for these uses. An overlay designation is being suggested rather than a zoning district because the negative affects on the non-auto dealer uses in the area will be minimized or eliminated. 2.5.3 City Center The intent of establishing a City Center in Spokane Valley is to create a higher density, mixed-use designation where office, retail, government uses, and residential uses are concentrated. The City Center will also be located at one of the major hubs of the region's high capacity transit (HCT) system. The City Center encourages higher intensity lana uses. Traditional city cen�ers are piaces v�rhere diverse office, retail, end govemmen► uses are concentrated, as well as cultural and civic facilities, community services and housing. Nationally, many cities are advocating mixed-use _. development in city center core - :�� areas for a number of reasons, ��"�'` including: - • Providing new housing, Y increasing the range of _ housing choices, and reducing dependency on the automobile by bringing work places and residences into close proximity; "- • __- F � �- • Providing retail and - � � ,� � service needs in close � .__ �_ . -_ __ proximity to residential ' "' � �' y ,. and employment centers; • Irnproving feasibility of Adopted April 25, 200fi (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Lend Use Page 15 of 36 City of Spokane Vailey Comprehensive Plan a development project. The proximity of urban services makes housing projects more desirable and a nearby source of consumers help make a commercial project more viable. Residents choose to live in higher density housing for a variety of reasons. First, higher density housing is more affordable than traditional single family housing. Second, the convenience and proximity to work, needed services and cuttural activities is very desirable for many people. Finally, many people find that they do not need a large, single family detached house. Given their lifestyle, they appreciate the low - ��'�� maintenance and security of higher density - living. There is a mutually supportive _ relationship between higher density - r - --� - � �T� ��S r _ _ residential uses and commercial and retail _ : �� _ �; _ �,� � ,,,. • _ activities. The presence of housing the core _ �� y r area also activates the streets in the city �� , � �-�� center, day and night. �_ � �, - r _ �, „ . Concentrating growth in a specific area also y �_, �� supports investment in public infrastructure � •� �' �'; including the regional HCT system. Existing ��, low density development does not generate '� '--' � sufficient levels of demand to optimize the ,• _s �;; -. return on investment in transit. Promoting y - � � �� ' higher density uses within walking distance of transit facilities will improve the viability of this significant infrastructure investment. Moreover, concentrating the highest density of development in the City Center, where a significant number of jobs and residences will be within walking distance of a transit station, helps reduce the dependency on the automobile and improves pedestrian mobility. The City Center emphasi�es pedestrian, bicycle, and transit mobility but will not be unfriendly to the use of automobiles. The City Center area will also be the central gathering �'`a�� place for the community - a place where the whole a�'' n..-:..�_.-- = community can congregate and celebrate. Accordingly, /. �" , _�� 1 l�'== �:�" "="=`�:� the Cit Center should include an outdoor s uare, p �_ k; Y q �E commons with amenities such as fountains, sculptures, �� - �'� ' and unique landscaping. Other civic amenities or �. ��" I . : buildings including city hall or a performing arts center ��__: _., �` � could be grouped around the core area square or park. �`�� Y � The City currently holds an annual Christmas Tree �W.•-.1-,y�.�L _ _ �_ �_-' _ .� '` Lighting Ceremony in the area designated as the City - . ,` -_ �,, �! � `_ Center. Additional such events throughout the year will ',��_, .� _ __ enhance the feeling of community in Spokane Valley. �� iy �r�,... ' -_ An appropriate street networic is a critical component of -�.,, �-- {�:�' =�� 1 � the City Center. The current network of collector streets and arterials, the disjointed grid, and large block sizes contribute to a lack of identit�r in the City. The solution is not necessarily to construct wider streets. Streets become less efficient as the number of lanes increases. Building new streets versus widening e�sting streets can be more cost effective, yields greater capacity, and will have a more positive impact on the City Center. Automobiles are likely to continue as a dominant mode of transportation for the foreseeable future. A compreF�ensive network of streets must be developed to distribute this traffic and create more driving choices. To the extent possible, the City should connect streets and construct new streets to form a tighter grid system within the City Center, especially in the core area, by negotiating new public rights-of-way and building new streets. This °interconnectivit�' serves to shorten and disperse trips, and consequently reduce travel on existing congested arterials. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use Page 16 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Pedestrian and bicycle mobility is a vital part of the future City Center --" � �� transportation system. Improvements �'� � `� for pedestrians and bicyclists should _ r ,� ` _�_ _ � support increases in transit services � ��" _ a QVa _ r�� , and promote the development of the i�_ `'� City Center. As the street system is . t�_� __ �_ _�' � developed to better accommodate the �� ~�� needs of pedestrians and bicyclists, a -�_.,:. � network of facilities for people on foot =_ ,� '.��' �� ;; and bikes should be established. - ' - �� _ _ ��'° ; � _,�. , Reducing the size of the street grid, � �,' ;� k::� �: �' improving auto circulation and creating `� - - � pedestrian linkages through larger ��,� � parcels is critical to establish walking n��r�e patterns that reduce dependency on the auto. As individual sites are designed and developed to be more pedestrian friendfy and improved pedestrian linkages are provided, the pedestrian system will handle an increasing share of trips. Special street design standards should be developed for the City Center. Special standards for extra-wide sidewalks (12 to 20 feet in width), pedestrian-scale street lighting, and additional amenities including benches, trash receptacles, and landscaped comer treatrnents should be included. Transforming the existing commercial core area into the proposed City Center is an ambitious task. It requires a significant transformation from a low-density, automobile oriented, largely retail area, to a higher intensity, more pedestrian oriented Mixed-use area. The City Center section of the Plan acknowfedges that the City Center will take some time to develop. The City can facilitate these changes through a series of small steps taken over time. This is especially true if the steps are consistent with emerging economic, social and demographic trends. As is the intent of this Plan. the phasing scenario presented here accounts for the timing of f118f projections and futu�e actions. As noted above, the implementation strategy is keyed to projected trends �� and regional planning goals. Its fom� � �"�. , � f" � >. _ � � � �, and character, as envisioned in thi s 4 �, �, ,�,��; �-. Plan, are dramatically different from ,�-�--� � : � . :. .�!�� ; � � , anything that now exists in the ,; .� � — proposed City Center area. It will �� .� ,. '. take some time for the development f,�. ��;,� .�,� a,.r � community to redirect its energy and "`= investments to produce development � that responds to the direction of the ��,� ,,, Plan. The demand for more intense ,-� �•' �� development opportunities in the City w :,,,�, ,. �,.,�, �� Center is not forecasted within the next few years. In the meantime, thE '� "'� � M City should discourage continued low- scale investment in this area since new development will take several years to be amortized, and will delay the eccomplishment of preferred development. As regulations are applied to modest renovations, it should be possible to gain some basic improvements. However, the City should not expect full implementation of the vision for the City Center until major property owners in the area are ready to install long-teRn, major development projects. The figures (computer generated as part of the TOD Study) at the beginning of this section first show the existing conditions of ihe City Center, the second figure illustrating potential redevelopment of the area over tjme. The pictures are taken from approximately Farr Road looki Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2– Land Use Page 17 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan east toward the U-City Mall area. The photos do not necessarily indicate specific recommendations for the area, but are merely an illustration of how a viable City Center could evolve through several coordinated, incremental steps taken over time. 2.5.4 Office Designation Spokane Valley has areas of quality office development. Several developments within the . :- ._ _ _ - � - • Argonne/Mullan Couplet, Pines Road, � � ;., -- -- .-��-�, - and Evergreen Road corridors � • - ;�t � � � � � � embody good design and are r � --- °---_- :- � _ tir: � :+ -- � �v �-- _ r . representative of desired future office �' "� � � : � � ! ' 9 � , development. Office development �,;.,� � ` "` ;�! _ ' � �s ► + -r- i will provide new job opportunities - �.. ;� - �� _ ; - -- within the community. � '�`-- ' �" 't� � -- ' - This comprehensive plan designation �_'_ ____ _ - is intended primarily for office development with limited retail or commercial uses. Retail and commercial uses are limited to those that are clearly subordinate to the primary office use, or the retail function primarily serves the office uses in close proximity to the retail or commercia� use. Primary uses which are representative of this comprehensive plan category, include medical and dental facilities, education services, insurance, real estate, financial institutions, design firms, and legal services. Areas designated as Office can serve a variety of functions. They can stand alone as major employment centers. They can also act as buffers or transition areas between higher intensity land uses and lower intensity land uses. For example, Office areas can provide a transition between industrial or commercial uses and residential areas. Office uses woric well for this because they tend to generate less traffic and noise, operate shorter hours and are often smaller in scale then industrial or commercial areas. The Office comprehensnre plan designation will be implemented through a series of office zoning districts. ''��:�� ` 2.5.5 Mixed-use T� r __ The concept of "Mixed-use" has been ., ,, _-=� �` �� lei �� around for centuries. Prior to the '` � _ � ,�, �� ' : �* ► �� advent of the automobile and the �� . � � roliferation of the road and hi hwa � °�� A'«�� '�' #��'� �� P 9 Y .: � i� , _ � ,� �<_ . � � system, Mixed-use was a _ ---.. _ _. _ . , t predominant urban form. The - --°- �""� � ' _ • A .� -.- -3- � "rediscovery' of this development � �_ type may be due in part to the _ - ` negative impacts of sprawl, which have resufted in traffic congestion, decline in air quality, and inefficient use of resources and infrastructure. Mixed-use development has several potential beneftts: • Land and infrastructure resources are used more efficiently; � Pedestrian-friendly neighborhoods; • Jobs are located near housing; • Opportunities to revitalize commercial corridors; Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use Page 18 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan • Opportunities for infill residential development (primarily in corridors); • Encourage new housing and innovative retail that is less auto dependent; and • Compatibility with existing transit access along local corridors. Mixed-use may be either 'horizontal Mixed-use' or 'vertical Mixed-use.' Horizontal Mixed-use means that residential, commercial, office and other uses are adjacent to each other typically as part of an overall master plan for a site. However, not all projects within a"Mixed-use' designated area must be Mixed-use to achieve the goals of this plan. For exampie, a new residential-only project that is appropriately designed and located adjacent to an older existing commercial buildina may help stimulate renovation and reuse. This would be a more likely scenario in the Corridor Mixed-use area rather than the Mixed-use area Vertical Mixed-use means that residential end nonresidential uses are stacked over each other. Typically, residential uses are placed over ground level reteil, offices andlor restaurant uses. This development type would be more likely to occ�r in the City Center or in the areas designated as Mixed-use. Corridor Mixed-Use Corridor Mixed-use is intended to enhance travel options, encourage development of localiy serving commercial uses, multi-family apartments, lodging and offices along major transportation corridor� identified on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map (Map 2.1). Corridor Mixed-use recognizes thE historical low-intensity, auto-dependent development pattem, and focuses on a pedestria� orientation with an emphasis on aesthetics and design. The Corridor Mixed-use designation i� primariiy used along Soraaue Ave�ue in order to sp�ce the areas desionated commerci�.' Mixed-Use Center The Mixed-use Center designation would allow for two or more dinerent lana uses withir� developments under this designation. As described above, Mixed-use developments can be eithEr vertical or horizontally mixed, and would include employment uses such as office, retail andlc�� lodging along with higher density residential uses, and in some cases community or culturc:'. facilities. Mixed-use developments in this designation ere characterized by differing land uses whi�.i� �:-_- developed pursuant to a coherent, approved plan of development. Com�atibility between us:.s �� achieved through design which integrates certain ., __,�._.:_.:.:..-� �. _�:--_____�•----- physical and functional features such as _ _ _ _ ___ , . �,,, � ; . , � , transportation systems, pedestrian ways, open .��'; � � ' ^ -, , , ' � '4 areas or court yards, and common focal points or ,�� ' �'�' `` ' emenities. ' .#' _ �".�� 2.6.6 Industrlal Designations '�" . � ��` - „;,= � � � . .�r" Providing for industrial land is important for the ___ _ _"' economic health of Spokane Valley. Industrial - businesses help drive the local economy and create an economic multiplier effect throughout the region. Providing an adequate supply of usable land with minimal environmental constraints and infrastructure in place helps ensure that Spokane Valley will be an attractive place for industrial businesses to locate and prosper. (See Chapter 7, Economic Development, for additional policies that encourage recruitment and retention of industrial business.) Heavy Industry Heavy industry is characterized by intense industrial activities which include, but are not limited to, manufacturing, processing, fabrication, assembly/disassembly, freight-handling and similar Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 19 of 36 C�ty of Spokane Valiey Comprehensive Plan operations. Heavy industry may have significant noise, odor or aesthetic impacts to surrounding areas. Commercial, residential and most recreational uses should not be allowed in areas designated for heavy industry, except for small-scale ancillary uses serving the industrial area. The conversion of designated industrial lands to other uses should be limited. Limiting incompatible uses ensures a competitive advantage in business recruitment by providing adequate industrial land supply, reducing land use conflicts and preventing inflation of land prices. Moreover, allowing a wide variety of commercial, retail and other uses in the Industrial areas would be in conflict with other portions of this Plan related to concentrating major commercial growth in nodes at the intersection of major streets. Light Industry The Light Industry designation is a planned industrial area with special emphasis and attention given to aesthetics, landscaping, and intemal and community compatibility. Uses may include high technology and other low-impact industries. Light Industry areas may incorporate office and commercial uses as ancillary uses within an overall plan for the industrial area. Non-industrial uses should be limited and in the majority of cases be associated with permitted industrial uses. The Light Industry category may serve as a transitional category between heavy industrial areas and other less intensive land use categories. The category may also serve as a visual buffer for heavy industrial areas adjacent to aesthetic corridors. 2.6.7 �-i�+� ��sParksl Open Space .•� � ; The ' ' � arks and Oc�en Space � '{ �, designation is intended to ` ' �'Y � ;� _ 1 �' '�Se"- x 1 1 1 �:C: � ^�' , .�l r� � • � ` � _, s � :�,^'•�' t� �,} .L � � �,� .� �� * „ R „_ a ,, � ` _ �. � ''� �� ^ ,' � � , .. :�.; . ' r �� " � ` . _� � � � .'1 !..-; ' _ �',�� , • ., . �� . ., protect� -- -- : �:� ��:� - parks, open space, and other natural physical assets �-; ��x �.�.: . �� of the commun �t_�� '��_`�s �, '• , -��... �, I r.. ` . I�.. .. ".,� -�lY � � YY�t�'S'�T��7 i� M ' -' - +— ' - ' � _ � .l. -�+Ifc}J�-- �� • - ��'.5��v-�-�-�2f3=.E'�- �G2�f�-�- ��t+�1?fr- � _ 2.6 Develooment Revlew Process . � . • . The Land Use chapter provides the policy foundation � for implementing zoning and development regulations. In developing policy concerning future land use regulations, or revisions to existing regulations, every effort has been made to instill certainty and efficiency in the development process. State legislation has focused on developing streamlined and timely permit processing. Through the goals and policies of this Plan, the City will continue to strive to provide an efficient and timely review system. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 20 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Ptan 2.7 Urban Desi�n and Form In addition to guiding development, the Land Use chapter also guides the quality and character of the City's future development pattem through goals and policies related to the form, function, and appearance of the built environment. These priorities and implementation strategies, related to quality development, serve and will continue to serve as a basis from which to develop appropriate implementation measures. The design of our urban environment has a significant effect on community identity. Well designed communities contribute to a healthful, safe and sustainable environment that offers a variety of opportunities for housing and employment. An attractive and well planned community is invaluable when recruiting new business and industry to an area. Some of the concepts considered include: • Community appearance, including signs and placemerrt of utilities; • Neighborhood considerations in the review of development projects; • Integration and linking of neighborhoods including bicycle and pedestrian facilit�es; • The effect of traffic pattems and parking on neighborhood character; • Encouragement of hi�h a��a!itv deve!c��me�t throuah th� �npr��ri�:' u��-- o` nl-:�-�;� ,_;n � developments; and • Consideration for p�.: �' � _ =. � : 2.7.1 Aesthetic Corridors Aesthetic corridors are int� -�i;i�� .� �;r�:�.�: ..-,� �� s�.:�:1 G�,��;��! c�` Sr��',�r�,L `�� -; �: ., n��, � transportation routes entering and exiting the cit�r. Aesthetic corridors provide special desig � standards for c_ -� _ ~'- _ - - ±,.,.-, ��±-.��. r-.;i �.� ,-J,;- ��_�...; _ �,, �,�a. ;._.,�,, Spokane Valley. Another compon�ri Gi i��i{ tC:i� i.Ufi lvuf� i5 lI IL yQICY�dy J iii:� ;f l(; :.'�4y I l ic;i ;, Ui :. �c;'� �� entrances into the City of Spokane Valley along major transportation comdors, including Spragu�_� Avenue, Trent Avenue, State Route 27 and a number of interchanges on Interstate 90. Desic- elements and landscaping treatments should denote a sense of arrival into the City, : neighborhood or special area such as the cit�r center. 2.7.2 Planned Unit Development= Building flexibility into the subdivis; .: . , � . _. _ _ _ � . � , _ � � : �. � : _� �, . c: .. ; .. .: . : � _: �: ,_ : _ .-: : :. site design. Planned unit developments (PUDs) provide the city a tool for allowing flexibility, whil�. ensuring a design meets overall health and safety standards, end is consistent with neighborhooci character. PUDs allow for deviations from the typical zoning standards in exchange for designs that protcct the environment, provide usable opEn space, and exhibit excAptional quality and design 2.8 Historica) and Cultural Resources 2.8.1 Background � - In many ways SPUKCf�C Vcilil:y 5 Cl,5�Ui1�, c7il�l GUliU�c1� iCSJU(i.CS ci"� S�iiiii�" tv i:.ii �i..ii (�ic:iu�c: resources. Like wetlands, rivers, lakes, streams end other natural resources, historic properties ar�= a finite and endangered resource. Also like our natural resources, once an historic c� a�chaeological property is destroyed, it is lost forever. Cultural resourc,es such as historic building_ monuments of historic events and archaeological sites are statements of Spokane Valley's identit.r People especia' . ��.�1�i:� c�� :":'r�_ ��`.�� h_,r�,�� ;� �•..�n ..�:�; ��,�,�-,��.� i��.t ��t �;� � ��:� f- o th r - areas of the stai�= Spokane Valley is ti�e locat�on or several Firsts to occur in ti�� Spokane Reg�o�. i he i�� ` permanent settler in the Spokane area was Antoine Plante, a retired French-Canadian trappe; . Plante buiit a cabin near the Spoka�e River in 1849, from which he opereted a small Hudson's Bay Adopted April 25, 200fi (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land U� 4: Page 21 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Company trading post. Plante also constructed and operated the first ferry on the Spokane River. Other settlers began amving in this area between 1865 and 1882. "Firsts° to occur in Spokane Valley include the first settler in 1849, first business and ferry in 1850, the first store and bridge in 1862, the first house in 1866 and the first post office in 1867. All of these 'firsts" occurred before the arrival in 1873 of James Glover who was considered the `Father of Spokane." A large part of Spokane Valley's identity is derived from its heritage. From the Native Americans who firsi established trading centers to the continuing waves of newcomers from around the world, all have left their mark. Cultural resources include historic structures and landscapes engineered and built by man: a. Historic buildings - houses, bams, commercial buildings, churches, schools. b. Historic structures - bridges, dams, stone fences. c. Historic districts - a grouping of buildings with related historic character. d. Historic objects - statues, monuments, sculpture. e. Landscapes — gardens, parks, urban and rural. Cultural resources include properties that were held in spiritual or ceremonial honor or by a cultural group or tribe. Cultural resources include properties which may no longer show evidence of man- made structures, but retain an historical association with an event or period. Archaeology sites include such areas as battlefields, campsites, cemeteries, burial sites, rock carvings, pictogrephs, trails, village sites, fishing sites, trading sites, religious and ceremonial sites. 2.8.2 Cultural and Hlsto�lcal Resource Issues _ Documenting Cultural Resources �' '" " Many historic homes, farms and sites exempfify the history and culture of the Spokane Valley area, but proportionally few have been written in historic register nominations. Designation requires owner consent, does not pose undue restrictions to the property owner, and can be a planning tool for govemment by • identifying significant properties. ► � ,'� _ Archaeological Sites and Security �'�:�; ,� ., -� � . * �� e � State laws require the protection of archaeological s�tes on both public and private land by directing that the locations of sites be ��;� � ,,�_ kept confidential within the assigned office because �, �.�� archaeological sites are highly susceptible to "treasure hunters i �'•;fi .:`- ' and grave robbers." Existing lists need to be checked to confirm �°� =�: � that evidence of the site/building remains, and a better means to = � identify and preserve evidence of significant archaeological sites ;: t Y�� a ,� is needed. - - �`�- �". _-' Cuttural resources are deemed important when they are over 50 years old, so identification and evaluation of them is a constant, ongoing process. Moreover, cultural resources are perceived as less important than other immediate, short-term City programs; therefore, funding and support for the preservation program is provided on an annual rather than an ongoing basis. 2.6.3 Spokane Valley Hlstoric and Cuitural Resources The Spokane Valley developed as imgated agricultural tracts in five and ten-acre lots. The apple orchards of Otis Orchards were supported by warehouses, packing plants, and box manufacturers. The apple industry which thrived in the early century was destroyed by killing frost of the 1950s. Newman Lake supplied the water that irrigated these orchards via the Spokane Canal Company. The flow control gate at Newman Lake (a great fishing spot) remains as a ruin with its story only in fading memory. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 22 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Pian Open canal ditches, concrete flues, cuftivated fields and apple orchards were part of growing up in the valley until the late 1950s. A canal ran behind Otis Orchards High School, neither of which now exists. The picture on page 25 shows an Otis Orchards irrigation canal. The Opportunity Township Hall was designed by Opportunity resident and noted Spokane architect C. Harvey Smith and constructed in 1912 by Opportunity -- builder and businessman C.E. Johnson. — �� Buift as Opportunity's government seat, the Opportunity Township Hall also served as the area's community hall and ., . r a meeting place for various philanthropic �� -�- ''.{ i and other organizations including the -, ,- 4 �� ,; �� Opportunity Moose Lodge, Boy Scouts, Giri Scouts, church groups, dance studios, and wedding parties. The Opportunity Township Hall is significant r�' as a rare (ocal example of Spanish- Mediterranean style architecture and for its association with the early settlement and development of the Spokane Valley and the town of Opportunity. 2.9 The Land Use/Tr�nsaortation Connection 2.9.1 Street Connectivity Street design can have a significant impact on community development. It is important that neighborhoods be connected is such a manner that ca�s, bicycles and pedestrians can pass with ease from one neighborhood to an adjacent neighborhood via collectors and arterials. Such a pattern promotes a sense of commun�ty. All new devebpments should give special corsideration to emergency accESS routes. 2.8.2 Traffic Calming Tra�c calming can be defined as measures that physically alter the operational characteristics of the roadway in en ettempt to slow down traffic and reduce the negative effects of the automobile. The theory behind traffic calming is that roads should be muftiuse spaces encouraging social links within a community and the harmonious interaction of various modes of travel (i.e., walking, cycling, auto, transit). 2.10 Citizen Participatlqn The City of Spokane Valley adopted a Public Participation Program for the preparation of the comprehensive plan. This program identified actions the city would take to meet the GMA requirements of "earfy and continuous° public participation in the development of the city's plan. Two of the public participation techniques identified in the Public Participation Program is citizen survey and a series of public meetings hosted by the cit�s planning commission. In the spring of 2004, the City hired Clearwater Research to conduct a statistically valid survey of Spokane Valley residents on a number of issues. Clearwater Research conducted a telephone survey with a random sample of 400 Spokane Valley adults. Survey data was collected from March 18 to April 7, 2004. The majority of respondents (83°�) indicated they thought Spokane Valley was headed in the right direction. However, respondents did identify a number of important issues facing Spokane Valley. Concerns about the economy and planning related matters were among the top issues respondents identified as facing the City. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 23 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 2.10.1 City Center/Community Identity Citv Center. Si�cty-one percent of respondents indicated that having a recognizable downtown or cit�r center was 100% important to the future of Spokane Valley $�o� ■ n=395 (figure right). Female respondents, respondents at lower income levels, and gpo/, respondents residing in one or two 350,� person households were most likely to 40% report that having a recognizable 20a a 1796 downtown was important to the future of Spokane Valley. There was strong �o� support among respondents for spending Very Somewhat Neutral Somawhat Very public money to create a city center. �, �►,im�n�,, i�c�,c i�onn�c Seventy-four percent of respondents either somewhat or strongly supported Spokane Valley officials using public money to develop a city center. Only two percent strongly opposed the use of Other 5X public money to create a city center. ■ � =233 Most Ideal Locatlon for a City Center Everypreon and Sprague 1 Over half of the respondents (52%) felt pines end Spragua 15�6 the University City area would be the most ideal Spokane Valley location for a Mirabeau Point 16�G city center. Other areas considered appropriate for the City Center included Univers�y City area 5 Mirabeau Point, Pines and Sprague, and Evergreen and Sprague. 0% 20% 40% 60°�6 80% 100% Importance of Spokane Valley Naving Communfty Identity Community Identitv. Only 26°� of respondents thought Spokane Valley had 100� a distinct identity or something that made ■ � =396 it unique. Interestingly, almost the same 84 percentage of respondents who said S okane Valle does not have a 6Q c mmunity identity (74%), indicated that 41 �� having a community identity was 4 0° � 0 important to the future of Spokane Valley � (76%). 0% Vtry Somewhat Neutral Somewhat Vrry unlmpo�taM unhnportant importaM importar�t Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 24 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Development of Community Identity Best Accomplished Through 1 �� _ Physicai or Social Changes g�o�o ■ n 288 While many respondents (47°�) feit gpo� community identity could be developed through social changes, others 40° believed physical changes (28°�) or a 20 a� o -- - combination of both physical and social changes (25%) were the best �% rT1@8�S fOf accomplishing th8 Physical changes Soclal changes 8oth Important development of community identity. 2.10.2 Community Aesthetics The typical pattern of development along the major streets of Spokane Valley did not appear to be of great concem to respondents. Just 22°� expressed dissatisfaction with the current type of development along major streets. Further underscoring the general lack of concern about the typical pattem of development along major streets, only 23% of respondents indicated adding street trees and landscaping to major streets should be a high priority for City officials. Lower income respondents were more apt than higher income respondents to report that makir�c ..:-�� :� pedestrian-friendly should be a high priority for City officials. SupportlOpposition to Development of Small Commercial Centers Close to Residential Nelghborhoods Respondents' opinions (graph right) 100% regarding the development of small gp% ■ n=38s commercial centers close to residential neighborhoods, were also 60% sharply divided. Just under haff of the o respondents (46%) were supportive 40 /o Z�o� 22�i6 15°�6 of developing small commercial 20% centers close to residential neighborhoods. Q�/, Strongly Somewhat Neutra! Somewfiat Stron�y appose oppose suppoK support Prio�ity Level: Stronger Controls on Signs and Billboards in Spokane Valley Opinions regarding the priority City officials should place on stronger sign 100% and billboard controls were very o ■ n=398 mixed. However, 67% of respondents 80 /o indicated that Spokane Valley officials 60% should place a medium or high , priority on stronger sign and billboard 40% 33� �� 33� control and as such, it is probable that the majority of residents would be 2 0% supportive of stronger billboard control and sign regulations. p% Low priority Medlum prlortty Hlgh phorfty 2.10.3 Results of "Unscientific" Survey During the community meetings held on the comprehensive plan, city staff made available the survey questions contained in the city's community survey. Meeting attendees were asked to complete the survey end either retum it before the end of the meeting, or to complete the survey at Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Us� Page 25 of 36 City o� Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan home and mail it to the city. In many cases the responses to the questions were similar to the responses of the formal survey conducted by Clearwater Research. These question numbers are right of the survey itself. The following are the results of the "unscientific° survey: How important to the future of Spokane Valley is havfng an area of the City that is recognized as the "downtown"? Would you say...? The responses to this question _ �- are very similar to those received ��,� during the formal community � � survey. The results above reflect �o,� — that out of the total responses of 177 on this issue, 102 or nearfy �°� 58 percent felt that Spokane , 33°� Valley having an identifiable 26°�6 18 ,� �g� downtown or city center was 20°� __ _ either somewhat important or 4 �'� very important. This is compared � ��'� � � to 40 responses or 22°� indicating very Somewhat Neitner somewt,ac very that an ident�able city center was important Important Impo�tant unlmpoKant unlmportant either somewhat or very no� unimportant. unlmportant If you feel a developing a"downtown" is important, which of the following areas of Spokane Valley would be the most ideal location for a downtown? Those respondents who indicated that having an identifiable city center overwhelming (73%) felt that the University City area was the most appropriate location for establishing a city center for Spokane Valley. 4°� 9 �� . _ 10°� 4°l0 ` . 73°�6 ■ University City area ■ Mlrabeau Point area o Pines 8� Sprague ■ Evergreen 8 Sprague ■ Other Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use Page 26 of 36 C►ty of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan In your opinion� does Spokane Valley have an identity or something that makes it unique? The result of this survey question is somewhat different from the results of the formal community survey. In the formal survey only 26% of the respondents felt that the Cit�r of Spokane Valley has en identity or something that makes it unique. The results in the graph at the right indicate that a majority of those surveyed at the community meetings (52%) felt there was something unique about Spokane Valley. 100°�6 ■ n=170 eo% so� - - — 39°� gqo,� 409�6 - — 13°� 20% - - 50 � 90 � 0% � � Very Somewhat Nefther Somewhat Very important Important important nor unlmportant unimportant i unimportant � How Important to the future of Spokane Valley Is having a"community Identlty? Would yo�� say...? When asked how important to the future of ,00•� Spokane Valley is having a distinct ■ n=155 community identity, an overwhelming 80 � � � majority of the respondents (73%) felt it is either somewhat important or very important 60x �� - 6 � that Spokane Valley have a distinct identity. �.,� - This is consistent with the results of the formal community survey where 76% of �� respondents felt it is important for the city to have a community identity. ax No Yes Would development of a"community identity" best be accomplished through physical changes, such as the development of a city center or the building of gateways at the major polnts of entry into the city� or through social changes� such as more community events like Valleyfest? _ �oox When asked what types of changes ■ n=150 would be needed to develop a community � — identity, a majority (57%) feft that both � � social end physical changes would be necessary to accomplish developing an �ox -- identity for the city. This is somewhat 16� 28x different than the formal survey where � -- s only 26°r6 of the respondents felt that both �. physical and social changes were equally � Pn c�,.�: s��.� cn.��es sow cn.�.s important to develop the city's identity. � �"'��'' �"' Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updeted 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land U�e Paae 27 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Do you consider adding street trees and landscaping to major streets in Spokane Valley a high� medium, or low priority for city officlals? In terms of community aesthetics, a - - - majority of the respondents (59%) felt �oo� that adding street trees and ■ n=�ss I landscaping to the major streets in � the city shouid be either a medium or �, high priority for c'ity officials. This a�x 4�� result was identical to the resutt of the ' city's formal community survey where _ 1e � 59% of respondents fett this should � be either a medium or high priority for ox> the city Low PNo�ity Medlum P�iorlty Hlgh Prio�lty 2.11 Goals and Pollcles Residential Goals 8� Policies Goal LUG-1 Preserve and protect the character of Spokane Valley's residential neighborhoods. Policies LUP-1.1 Maintain and protect the character of existing and future residential neighborhoods through the development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations and joint planning. LUP-1.2 Protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent non-residential uses and/or higher intens'rty uses through the development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations and joint planning. LUP-1.3 Review and revise as necessary, existing land use regulations to provide for innovation and flexibility in the design of new residential developments, accessory dwelling units and in-fill development. LUP-1.4 Encourage the development of transpo�tation routes and facilities to serve residential neighborhoods. Special attention should be given to pedestrian circulation. LUP-1.5 Encourage the development of parks and the dedication of open space in and adjacent to residential areas. Open space dedication shall be propo�tionate to the size of the development. LUP-1.6 Preserve site characteristics that enhance residential development (trees, bodies of water, vistas, and similar features) using site planning techniques such as clustering, planned unit developments, transfer of development rights and lot size averaging. LUP-1.7 Allow zone changes within the Low Density Residential category only when spec�c criteria are met. Criteria may include: • Substantial changes within zone change area. • Clear mapping errors. • Adequate facilities and services (e.g. sewer, water capacity). • Consistency with densities in the vicinity of the zone change. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 28 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Goal LUG-2 Encourage a wlde range of housing types and densities commensurate with the community's needs and preferences. Policies LUP-2.1 Allow and encourage a variety of housing types in designated Mixed-use areas, especially in the City Center area. LUP-2.2 Use design and performance standards for residential developments to achieve integration in commercial and Mixed-use developments. Performance standards should focus on scale, appearance, and compatibility. Encourage variations in facades and rooflines to add character and interest to multi-family developments. LUP-2.3 Encourage the development of transportation routes and facilities to serve residential neighborhoods. Special attention should be given to walking, biking and transit uses. LUP-2.4 Residential development should be designed to provide privacy and common open space. Open space areas shall be proportionate to the size of the residential development LUP-2.5 Consider special developmert techniques (e g., zEro lot I�nes, lot size ave;aging. and planned unit developments) in single-family areas, provided they result in residential deve!�pnzer,� consis'��n' �•r�',h th� qual�ty 2n.+ char�c!�r o� Existin� neighborhoods Commercial Goals 8� Poficies Goal LUG Transform various camrnercial t�tisines� a:eas ir��o vit�i, attraciive, easily accessible mixed use areas that appeal to investors, consumers and residents and entiUrice the comrnil►�9ty ir�iace and economic vitality. Policies L Vf" - ..... I �il..vuic��C1 liU;'i:,�lii(IVc3i;:��l Cil �'�Yic1y_iC i��:�:ii.,C 1�::��1.��;c: `..:i;ll'il,..,il,f' L,J ;..,1ci� corridor into a quality mixed-use retail area. Retail development along th�� corridor, exclusive of the City Center, should be concentrated at arteriG � intersections and designed to integrate auto, pedesVian, and transit circulatior� Integration of public amenities and open space into retail and office developmcr•.; should also be encouraged. LUP-3.2 Encourage large bulk retailers to locate in the designated Regional Commercial nodes around arterial intersections. Goal LUG-4 Provide nelghborhood and community scale retail centers for the City's neighborhoads. Policies LUP Integrate retail developm�nts i-�'o s �!rroiina;��g �e�ic�ent�Gl areas �r.ri'h att�nti��n ta quality design and function LUP-4.2 Encouraa�- :�_._i��` �:��.� '�i; �� ,�_ �.;�:_��s� �� r�� ;� �,,��,,,�_;��; �.�--_, services LUP�.3 Encourage retail and personai services to group together wi�h:� � p Gnz c�n;ers to allow for ease of pedestrian movement. LUP-4.4 Encourage Mixed-use residential and commercial and off�ct d•��iopr�,er�` in Neighbofiood Comme�ci�l des�gnat�ens where comp.-tibility witn r�earby uses r_.��n b;; d��mo^str�:te� Adopted April 25, 200G (U pdated 7-3 i -2008 j �'', � l�'.�' � - �-� �� =� � � � � Page 29 of 36 C�ty of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan LUP-4.5 Ensure compatibility between mixed-use developments and residential areas by regulating height, scale, setbacks, and buffers. LUP-4.6 Develop community design guidelines to promote common open space, public art, and plazas in commercial and office developments. LUP-4.7 Develop design guidelines that encourage quality design and pedestrian and vehicle circulation in commercial, office and Mixed-use developments. LUP-4.8 Develop design guidelines to encourage commercial development to locate along the street edge (where deemed appropriate) to provide pedestrian street access. LUP-4.9 Identify and designate streets where on-street parking can be safely provided without unduly slowing traffic flow or jeopardizing traffic safety. LUP-4.10 May provide incentives to encourage developers to include housing in mixed-use projects. Goal LUG Identify appropriate locations for the Auto Row Overlay deslgnation. Policies LUP-5.1 Identify other appropriate automobile related uses within the Auto Row Overlay designation that are complementary to automobile dealerships. LUP-5.2 Develop appropriate development standards for permitted uses within the Auto Row Overlay designated area. City Center Goal LUG-6 Create an identi�able City Center that serves as the social, cultural, and economic focus of the City of Spokane Valley. Policies LUP-6.1 Define a City Center with distinct boundaries, unique buitding types, and special features. LUP-6.2 Strengthen existing connections of the City Center area to the region's high capacity transit system. LUP Focus on improving the existing character and image of the City Center area through appropriate development regulations and design standards. LUP-6.4 Develop land use regulations that allow higher intensity development in the City Center including, but not limited to, taller buildings, increased floor area ratios (FAR) and permitted uses. LUP-6.5 Coordinate with urban service providers to ensure sufficient capacity is available for anticipated development. LUP-6.6 Allow for a variety of uses and mixed-use development within buildings or complexes. Ensure that mixed-use development complements and enhances the character of the surrounding residential and commercial area. LUP-6.7 The City should always consider City Center sites regarding potential civic and cultural uses the City develops, such as a City Hall. LUP-6.8 Provide incentives to attract cuttural and civic uses to the City Center over which the City does not have direct control, such as libraries or recreation facilities. LUP-6.9 Develop land use regulations that encourage higher density residential uses on the periphery of the City Center area in close proximity to high capacity transit. High density housing should be accompanied by residentially oriented retail and service uses. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 30 of 36 City of Spokane Vailey Comprehensive Plan LUP-6.10 Provide amenities such as community services, parks and pubiic spaces to meet the residential needs in the City Center. LUP-6.11 Provide an effective transition between the periphery of the City Center and nearby lower density residential development. Goal LUG-7 Provide a balanced transportatlon network that accommodates public transportation, high occupancy vehicles, pedestrians, bicyclists, automobiles and integrated parking. Policies LUP-7.1 Improve traffic circulation around and through the City Center by extending the street network and creating smaller blocks. LUP-7.2 Encourage pedestrian and bicycle circulation by providing public sidewalks, street trees, street fumiture and other amenities. LUP-7.3 Require clear and safe pedestrian paths to enhance the pedestrian network. LUP-7.4 Connect the main entry of buildings to public sidewalks by an identifiable walkway. LUP-7.5 Allow for on-street parking on the internal City Center street network. LUP-7.6 Encourage transit use by improving pedestrian and bicycle linkages to the existing and future transit system. Office Goals 8� Policies Goal LUG Create appropriate development standards for Office designated areas. Policies LUP-8. i Allow commercial, residential and recr �ational uses in c��junction with pcm�itted uses in Office designated areas. LUP-8.2 Integrate sidewalks, bike lanes, landscaping, and area lighting in office areas to provide a safe and attractive working environment. Mixed-use Goals 8� Pollcies Goal LUG-9 Encourage the development of Mixed-use areas that foster community identity and are deslgned to support pedestrian, bicycle and reglonal translt. Policies LUP-9.1 The characteristics of a Mixed-use area should include: • Housing and employment densities to support regional transit service; � Public transit connections; • Safe, attractive transit stops and pedestrian and bicycle ways; • Buildings that front on wide sidewalks with attractive landscaping, benches and frequent bus stops; • MuItI-story buildings oriented to the street rather than parking lots; and • Parking space located behind or to the side of buildings or in parking structures. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 31 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan LUP-9.2 The mix of land uses allowed in either the Corridor Mixed-use or Mixed-use Center designation should include: • A variety of housing types including apartments, condominiums, town houses, fin►o-family and single family dwellings on small lots; • A full range of retail goods and services including grocery stores, theaters/entertainment, restaurants, personal services and speciafty shops; • Publiclquasi-public uses and/or open space; • Professional OfFce and other employment oriented uses; and • Commercial uses that require large land areas but have low employment density and are auto-dependant, such as lumber yards, plant nurseries, warehouses, and auto dealerships, should be prohibited from either Mixed- use category. Industrial Goals 8� Policies Goal LUG-10 Provide for the development of well-planned industrial areas and ensure the long-terrn holding of appropriate land in parcel sizes adequate to allow for future development as industrlal uses. Policies LUP-10.1 Plan capital facility expenditures to assist the development of lands designated for industrial uses. LUP-10.2 Encourage a diverse array of industries to locate in Spokane Valley. LUP-10.3 Encourage shared-use par{cing, pedestrian access and transit incentive programs in industrial development projects. Goal LUG-11 A variety of strateglcally located heavy industrlal areas should be designated and protected from conflicting land uses. Policies LUP-11.1 Commercial, residential and recreational uses should be limited or not allowed in areas designated for industry, except for small-scale ancillary commercial and recreational uses intended to primarily serve the industrial area. LUP-11.2 Conversion of designated industrial lands to other uses should be strictly limited to ensure an adequate land supply. LUP-11.3 Provide appropriate buffering, landscaping and other development standards for industrial areas. LUP-11.4 Retail outlets shall be allowed for industrial businesses that manufacture and/or assemble products on-site. Goal LUG-12 Designate and protect a varlety of strategically located light industry areas. Policies LUP-12.1 Commercial, residential and recreational uses shall be limited or not allowed in areas designated for light industry except for small-scale ancillary commercial and recreational uses primarify to serve the industrial area. LUP-12.2 Light industry areas shall include lighting, sidewalks, bike lanes and landscaping to provide a safe and ettractive working environment. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 32 of 36 City of Spokane Vailey Comprehensive Plan LUP-12.3 Retail outlets shall be allowed for industrial businesses that manufacture andlor assemble products on-site. Development Review Goals 8� Policies Goal LUG-13 Develop and maintatn an efficient and timely development review process. Policies LUP-13.1 Maximize efficiency of the development review process by continuously evaluating the permitting process and modifying as appropriate. LUP-13.2 Assist developers with proposals by continuing to offer pre-application mee±ings in order to produce projects that will be reviewed efficiently. Urban Design and Form Goals 8� Pollcles Goals LUG-14 Improve the appearance and fiinction of the buift environment. Policies LUP-14.1 Use performance and commun�ty design standards to maintain neighborhooc: character, achieve a greater range of housing o�'��r�� an� t�� cr��tF �13.?r'� and desirable commercial and office development� LUP-14.2 Adopt specific regulations for designate :; -�: � _ : � � � � � - ._ _ � � � -; �_ � :� ' � � =�. � • Provide incentives for aesthetic des ;.� �. • Require landscaping buffers adjacent � � � _:_::i .: _ ., � • Limit sign height and siz:.. • Provide performance stand�rds t� adeauatc�y �crc�r� u�tcnsi�� iGr�� ,<�_�; that have exterior clutter such as outdoor storege, exterior heavy equr.-�, ` and/or exterior fabrication/assembly. • Prohibit off-premise signage and billboar �- LUP-14.3 Establish standards for the scale and intensity c ` � .�_�r� � � �:: .: _ , _. : �:: :; :�, . -. : _. signage that protect views and minimize signa��- c�:.:t:� r:�.�i��i!�� I ��.�.��,�:� �:d �cu�t� business ident�cation. LUP-14.4 Establish a"cap and replace' system for billboard�. LUP Designate aesthetic corridors along major tran�partatic,n rautes to provide a positive image �� ..,,�... ,- �.��:�,� � r� � �'�,-. � ;-c I�r.-.. -c ��,..,�., tf �: �: _�. following routE � • Stete Rou►� 17 frcm �i 6� south to 32 and ��1ans� �ciu to - i rc� �! • Appleway Boulevard (south side from P� •� t� � � � r �,, � � ^.� �� - • Mirabeau Parkway from Pines to Indian�: • Dishman Mica Road from 8"' Avenue, so��tn to C�ty �,n • 32"� Ave. within the City limits • Appletivay Blvd from BGrker to Hodges Adopted April 25, 200G (Updated 7-31-2008) Chdp�cr 2— Lana Use Page 33 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Historic and Cultural Resources Goals 8� Policies Goai LUG-15 Identify and protect archeological and historic sites and structures. Policies LUP-15.1 Continually identify and evaluate archaeological and historic sites to determine which should be preserved. LUP-15.2 Link cultural resource preservation with local econornic development strategies. LUP-15.3 Establish and maintain relations with Native American tribes for the preservation of archaeological sites and traditional cultural properties. Land UselTransportation Connection Goals 8� Policies Goal LUG-16 Provide a street system that connects neighborhoods. Policies LUP-16.1 Encourage new developments, including multifamily projects, to be arranged in a pattern of connecting streets and blocks to allow people to get around easily by foot, bicycle, bus or car, LUP-16.2 Develop street, pedestrian path and bike path standards that contribute to a system of fully connected routes. LUP-16.3 Require adequate emergency evacuation routes prior to approving new development or rede�e{opment. Joint Planning Goals and Policies Goal LUG-17 The City of Spokane Valley shouid contlnue to coordinate with Spokane County and neighboring citles for adjacent urban growth areas. Policies LUP-17.1 The City should coordinate with Spokane County to ensure appropriate service provision and land development prior to City annexation. Methods to allow for coordination may include, but are not limited to, execution of an interlocal agreement between the City of Spokane Valley and Spokane County to: • Establish guidelines for development plan review, impact fees and SEPA mitigation; and • Define service delivery responsibilities, level of service standards and capital facility implementation consistent with the goals and policies of this Plan. LUP-17.2 Through regional planning efforts, the City and County should ensure that planning is compatible with the Cities of Spokane and Liberty Lake. LUP-17.3 The City should continue coordinated planning efforts between Spokane County, appropriate fire districts, school districts and water service providers to assure managed growth in urban growth areas. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 34 of 36 Ciry of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Potentlal Annexation Area Goals and Poticies Goal LUG-18 Identify Potentlal Annexation Areas for the City of Spokane Valley that are consistent with the Spokane County regional urban growth area boundary. Policies LUP-18.1 Within the existing urban growth area, identify potential annexation areas that are contiguous to the city limits and not assigned to another city. LUP-18.2 Coordinate with adjacent cities and Spokane County to review and update the regiona) urban growth area boundary consistent with the Countywide Planning Policies and RCW 36.70. LUP-18.3 Propose changes to the regional urban growth area boundary necessary to accommodate Spokane Valle�s 20 year population allocation. LUP-18.4 The City will not accept requests to annex unincorporated territory located outside the designated urban growth area t�I . ' ' ._. � L ... _Y . : . .� . . _ _ , - - .. LUP-18.65 Complete necessary capital facilities planning for any newly proposed urban growth areas in accordance with the Countywide Planning Policies. Goal LUG Collaborate with adjacent cltles. Saokane Countv, and affected resfdents Policie LUP- i y.1 Pursue in►eriocal a�reements �vitn Spokan6 Couniv to supc�ort coL�'r,orative �c��r+: planning within aotential annexation areas to ensure consistent develoament. LUP Inform affected residents propertv oUrners and businesses in the annexatir, process. LUP 3 Include IanAUaqe in an interlocal agreement utilizinq the tool of annexation, prior to urban develo�ment to conbol the tvee auality and location of development in potential annexat+on areas. �.UP-19.4 Coordinate with Spokane County to work with affected neiqhborhoods upon annexation to orovide a smooth transition from Saokane Countv to the Citv of Spokane Va11ey administration. C�oal LUG-20 Promote orderlv arowth within aotential annexatlon a�eas Policies LUP-20 1 Perform a fiscal analysis and provide a service plan for all areas �ro�osed for annexation Lup-20 2 Incomorate uotential annexation areas in the Capital Facilities Plan includinq proaosed locations for new capital facilities. LUP-20 3 Str'tve to retain neiqhborhood inteqritv in adLstinq patential annexation areas boundaries Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 35 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Goai LUG-21 Develoa an annexation arocess for potential annexation areas Policies LUP-21.1 Evaluate anne�cations within the Aotential annexation areas based on the following criteria: • The Cit�s ability, either in house, bv contract, or by special purpose district, to arovide �ublic services at the Citv's ado�ted level of service • The annexation boundarv should provide a contiguous and regular boundarv with cur�ent Citv (imits • The anne�tion boundary, where aaaropriate should use ahysical boundaries. includina but not limited to. bodies of water, existing or future riaht-of-wav. roads. and toaographv • Assessment of staff time and ex�ense involved in �rocessinq the annexation ►eauest • Review right-of-way issues prior to definin� boundaries of individual annexations to determine logical inclusions or exclusions • The annexation boundarv. where appropriate, should adiust any impractical or irregular boundaries • When the �roQOSed annexation is located in the vicinitv of a public facilitv. the City should evaluate the feasibility of modifyinq the annexation boundary to inctude the aublic facility LUP-21.2 Process annexations in accordance with State annexation laws in a timely and efficient manner LUP-21.3 Generally, the Citv of Spokane Valley prefers the Petition Method of Annexation. LUP-21.4 Ensure that newly annexed territory accepts its epuitable share of the City's bonded indebtedness Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 36 of 36 l�'��)��r.jr�`�,.`.I_r, .� ; ",tl ,, � c; ti ) 1 i.� r� C: � � - i Section No. �CP Desi nation �Subse uent Zo�in J WS-1 Low Densit Residential SF Residential District R-3 � WS-2 Low Dens' Residential SF Residential Urban District R-4 WS-3 Medium Densi Residential Muttifamil Medium Densi Residential District MF-1 WS-4 Hi h Densi Residential Multifamil Hi h Dens' Residential District MF-2 WS-5 Commun' Commercial Communi Commercial District C WS-6 R ional Commercial R ional Commercial RC WS-7 Parks and O en S ace Parlcs and O n S ace PIOS Sectlon No. CP Desi natlon Subse uent Zonin WN-1 Hea Industrial Hea Industrial I-2 WN-2 R ional Commercial Re ional Commercial RC WN-3 Low Dens' Residential SF Residential District R-3 WN-4 Low Dens' Residential SF Residential Urban District R-4 WN-5 Office Office O WN-G O�ce Garden Office GO WN-7 Li ht Industrial Li ht Industrial I-1 WN-S Low Densit Residential SF Residential Suburban District R-2 WN-9 Parks and O en S ace Pa�ics and O en S ace P/OS Sect�on No. CP Desl natlon Subse uent Zonin WCS-1 Low Dens' Residential SF Residential Estate District R-1 WCS-2 Low Dens' Residential SF Residential Suburban District R-2 WCS-3 Low Dens' Residential SF Residential District R-3 WCS-4 Communi Commercial Commun' Commercial District C WCS-5 Nei hborhood Commercial Nei hborhood Commercial NC WCS-6 Parks and O en S ace Parks and O en S ace P/OS Section No. CP Desl nation Subse uent Zon1n WC-1 Low Densit Residential SF Residential Suburban District R-2 WC-2 Low Densit Residential SF Residential District (R-3 WC-3 Corridor Mixed Use Corridor Mixed Use CMU WC-4 Hi h Densi Residential Muftifamil Hi h Densi Residential District MF-2 Section No. CP Desi nation Subse uent Zonin WCN-1 Corridor Mixed Use Corridor Mixed Use CMU WCN-2 Medium Densi Residential Multifamil Medium Densi Residential Disirict MF-1 WCN-3 Office Office O WCN-4 Communit Commercial Communit Commercial District C WCN-5 Li ht Industrial Li ht Industrial I-1 WCN-6 Hi h Dens' Residential Multifami Hi h Dens' Residential District MF-2 WCN-7 Low Densit Residential SF Residential District R-3 WCN-8 Mixed Use Center Mixed Use Center District MUC WCN-9 Parks and O en S ace Parks and O en S ace PIOS 1 of 2 Public/Quasi-Public Analysis Section No. CP Desi natjon Subse uent Zonin ECN-1 Mixed Use Center Mixed Use Center District MUC ECN-2 Hi h Dens' Residential Multifamil Hi h Dens' Residential District MF-2 ECN-3 Parks and O en S ace Parks and O en S ace P/OS ECN-4 Hea Industrial Hea Industrial I-2 ECN-5 Low Dens' Residential SF Residential District R-3 ECN-6 Low Densit Residential SF Residential Urban District R-4 Section No. CP Desi nation Subse uent Zonin EC-1 Corridor Mixed Use Corridor Mixed Use CMU EC-2 Office Garden Office GO EC-3 Hi h Densit Residential Muftifamil Hi h Densi Residential District MF-2 EC� Low Densit Residential SF Residential District R-3 EG5 Office Office O EC-6 Re ional Commercial Re ional Commercial RC Section No. CP Desi nation Subse uent Zonin ECS-1 Low Densit Residential SF Residential Suburban District R-2 ECS-2 Parks and O en S ace Parks and O en S ace PIOS ECS-3 Low Densit Residential SF Residential District R-3 ECS-4 Hi h Densi Residential Multifamil Hi h Densit Residential District MF-2 ECS-5 Corridor Mixed Use Corridor Mixed Use CMU ECS-6 Medium Dens� Residential Multifamil Medium Densi Residential District MF-1 Section No. CP Desl nation Subse uent Zonin ES-1 Low Dens' Residential SF Residential Suburban District R-2 ES-2 Low Dens' Residential SF Residential Urban District R-4 ES-3 Low Densit Residential SF Residential Estate District R-1 ES-4 Low Dens' Residential SF Residential District R-3 ES-5 Communit Commercial Communi Commercial District C ES-6 Medium Densit Residential Multifamil Medium Densi Residential District MF-1 ES-7 Corridor Mixed Use Corridor Mixed Use CMU ES-8 Office Garden Office GO Section No. CP Desi nation Subse uent Zonln EN-1 Parks and O en S ace Parlcs and O n S ace PIOS EN-2 Medium Densit Residential Muftifamil Medium Densit Residential District MF-1 EN-3 Low Densit Residential SF Residential District R-3 EN-4 Low Densit Residential SF Residential Urban District R-4 EN-5 Hea Industrial Hea Industrial I-2 EN-6 Li ht Industrial Li ht Industrial (I-1) 2 of 2 Public/Quasi-Public Property �� r . , �Q�fld r ._,.. ' `� � . � a '. � �r s1d'Or1 QO�ltdYf�� ! � ♦ � W ll' � �I. � � � ` ` ' � , - I .� , � �� ; � 5-� - � � � - � � ` � , ` �� - -We�t-Centr�'f Nortt� -,., „� - � - : •..- � � �-- � N - � _ � � � -` - _ ' ' � � r � ' ~ �-- � E-�':.�-�� — Tc T - — . _ � _ _ �r i �_� ' � � I ^ �t� � � ..... _ 1� � -, — _ _ ,,,.t � ,_...-,�.� _�..__ . � _ - � - __ r . . -- � e ' e _ _ - � f'`� - _.` R w � \! � �' � - _ �- r�c . _ _ _ 5 - - r _ x � � - f= - f -;� - � -- _�M_ � � � � �_ _ f - � - • � '^ _ � � � � J_ !� Y �� . �`. �� 1 s .0 r � J � � �'h� � � , �) � � Ya1leyVafl�ywBY -��!/� °-' yY� � � L I Vslle .� - Nfxort� I � �� i� h � �_ �- , _ Main ____ �., � ��- � g -' � i �Rfverafde ! . � - u /�` - -� �, c d � ��fi��tAti�t�ti��e��r��i,��t��iur��i��j��w��t�� .��N��t��ti.��et�n�� .�� .-n � � . � = ��-- - - � L �� 4� f�4,�` - 1st,�YVs-�',._,~- -1- �j -� �� w - L2nd_ I � ti i• - � . g� ' � `" S--�f1d__- � � _ D ��y.�_ __ --' � : � I� ,., ; �;�,,� � WS-4 �`� � � ► sro � :...-- � � � � �� ar .�� .�� so wze5 �—�- �: H D R __ � ii� RC -- ' tth - N� �th-- -_ _ � - �� Yf��/r u � �. � -5th -� � c` -�'—� ti c � I _sih; -WwS-'l = e� ��c��«a Y ' �cn .. � ,—.,�P/OS t � a Pott±}� �9.. � th � i J� 11 � � �7 -- E». �- , k—T _ — � Legend � M � - o - � �'� � � o � � � � �WS= — `�' � WSPG�P : - _ '�. , A INS-� _ N � � r'Y � . , - � LDR ��,� a, � MDR� � � 'L PQPID = LDR 3 �, � '°m `I ,� ,,,� 0 ws-, � � �' -- � i tn- ° � a � � ws-2 - -� ztn> > . . � E � �� , ) � 0 � � � d>'� '' °� - i '�' , M 1 � 1 ��. 4. �� WSd � 1!/ J�' � 1 th � �� .'s� .�'� � � = i�rw 1�� •�� E �� + � r � ` �� + ��r�t�4�■.ri��t�� d. 17 � � �i� � ws-7 �. , �--� � � � � � a �e�, 1s�n_ �r � � .. !�' �� . o � : � � �� (�!d �//��1��'! f , ,� , r . y `t , � � � '7 tt��t�111�I��/�� ` �� . : � ; '�► ♦ ��fi ^ J _ I i� Fa�rounds � g aE� 6 _ _ - - _ ltl_ . �►]' Alki f - � - � � � �Olf �'�' a . ��rv+►az _:. � -i � �� m VslloywaY _ __ - �_ ;; . Nlxon�' �,�- �� ' �� Main_ erti^ . � - - . _ � �, ," � , ��,t � !� �' Rlyerslde - _�� ' : . (� - v C ,. ' �I�i// �iii111/f��i��liiii��"��Y ��ttf!La!l�1�l��I�I�it/1t1 ,e.�t�iturrr�.R�f��i��r�w*�tt��sPr��e��i��t�_u�MHfw��**r�*ii��ritt� ; �st � _ - �� '' _ �� "��e �� , � ��'' .�'a �, _� �� . � I G ` �9 �- nd WS-�J - O -� t�-- _ ; .qpp� ,tit I �— — 1 - — — Y � ' �� Z�� c � - •�— � V1�S-4- � ewa _l_ ' y _ ' ��.�d � 90� .�� ,�e �cs�►_ >.'t�'1��" �I �C �' - -. -�+WS-6 � _..z��=oK.-_-�=�1�-_-___,_: _. �; ---I —MF-2_ sre _ .�r ; RC f � _f.�� = w — — , -- - -- act�_ _ -�, -_-_ �. . at� � 1� ��r � � ' 3 I � � '.:��' �� M �� _ � C WC 7 , 7 � V � f = etn � _ �� ; Y = � stin-=f- ' — 6 t,�-�►. ,�PIOS�L Legend � . _ �PQ�c�' , c�°� , ,v+n � w • � � � � eti = _ �- ��; ��• , i 7 th -� — _, — ' - . � WSP�P _�: _ � _1 �` � --- - g — — - �eth � �� PQPtD � c� i� v-. i '-' � A ��S-3 � . _ – — 9th, � � WS-1 � �S`2 =° � �/S-� � ' ¢� �F=� Z .._.. ��M = - � r � '-• - �_ � ..�!�!! YtJ"Z � � = R"4 R ��- — � �is� � ; � ws-3 � ��' - - �i1��1/��11�/��/��f11� � � r -�' � ' � � � + � = 14 c ,,,-- r� �, ��_� � �� '._ cZ �� WS-5 � `�J� �r � �� 7F� !' - WS"G � � � ' - � �. � d °da � 1 = 1 �� r �,.�� ' WS-7 A�� f�/��I�f� � � 7t11 � � ��I� • + �` � � I �' i o �'Y � N 1$th � � ■ = � � o�� :..... = onin �'� y�°-J , , �°'-- 9',, •r,, - t��i�� ?.qi�--- = ; 1 ��i:•�y�r � �� L�gend � b��t � � — � .z� = � INNPQP �'� �' T • • =� � * WN-8 PQPID y 1 � cild - ,�,,,, , � k ' ` �LDR _ �� - �-� � �� race i � yyH'3 �� uck � �lli ��- 0 �-� .••• a� _ _ _ - - _ `"''i's •��►��** ' � ft�� , � �� ''',`��= ' N I Cs�1�_ ��s�� e � Mor�.4rt►e � - � - �� .� , -- - ar�� td ' E M nitl� d_ �� i _ �.d �nox � � � ;: _ � , o , o: � a _ -�=- I - �-� �� ' o � � - Ithielli '�, � � � _ �_ _ _ - _rnM __ � M d�s"a � � � ` � o ��r;, � �O � � 9_ �i � �.w�� -: �i" %�$'� � --- - � N - � -- . } �� i � �� WN-7 A��.,:a ' �'`; � = MtasiQ� resi .,, � i_ � �•�+` � e o L � — . � � � � o •♦ - -+ � a. ��1 3 '� � R '' �iSlnto g� � Sint t�� - _ _ I O � � `^ � t , har* � '��*�� ♦ Lsoon ' `_Q x -sharp, _ �:. . -_�. •-- ' ,��t�� . Oe�met , ��-4 -- et N•5 0 � tal� v� ' � L:� R ��y ��N-� � �� o�_Dean �9� �Sc- WN -� c; �: � . � °1 W� I ' P�OS � r � -- �"��._Sroadwa � �� _ --� :Malto� ��" i% �0 � - r r advr� � � - -� - ��- � . . l 1 � _'` '. _ r - -�--- Y _ G # - I, ' �; y,�� _ . o A�� F A �k�_�--- -�-� �d- �'�`� � LDR�,.. - � ,� - - RC _ Q �3' ' Iv _ N�6�� r _ �X�n , � i I O� � � ��x� ,__ o aln.� �c. i -- � Mai ;--_.� � ��% ` tversl_de: 5� �' - on _ _ , .. �� - .� . � � � � �� ■�� `r��t �Afi�'l4��r��e��a�� i.��s��i��yi��t• __ t c- �- -- � � ,� .-- - -- -- -- ---. r-�' `- _' .►�vy � 1 �� '� . � .�.-�lor� �' — = W W � Legend '" � ■ �� i M�/Y� � � � � i � _ _ on�n �� - WN.B TPZ 6 � � — k •2 �pQp � ' � atrv� _ � PQPID � ;; ' � - - WN-1 ' . - uck ♦�� ! � ��., �� - � ��ie�� ack n ,. s�� WN� �� !�Ad . � � t � �� , � I .: ,;:=;-; �� ,..- � tNN-4 ��• u'1_� , �+� �:-- � �lontgano - �-� � - .— Mar�sfi Id .� �\:� , I�__ L : . ' v . �. _ �$ � �� Ic '� �',- =, `_ a 6 � x : >4 � �� Ra - � M'c h1��iIMd � �-7 --- Y -- -_� � Trent _-- �,�d��rin ' _ - r� � ! , � g0 Q wtv-$ � � WN-7 ��dw � Q , ! �� _ � � � � � _ - �_9 I -1 — �' � ` - �!'� = �-,. � -� _ _�-_`;; _ _�y_: .�. . . - Mlssion � `�� ,. - �� ,, --� / C ��• .� � �o u — _ �) I �s � �C � • � t • � �' :9 � � ... � � � `' � � , 3� � m � , -� i � . '�C �►�'�� ' _ � � t m �` �� '�' ' _. t,'`'�� +�'.—� IBv+� �� Q Sharp ►-; .�: '� � /` B � � � •� f � WN-4 � �>>� i�- T �t._ �.Deamet . I%,,.._..- _ WN-S� o � ,_. � � i -- c�ieo � d ,. --- �" R-4 c�c��do -C� � ; __.�' ---- WN-1 ,��, _m __, ° ' ti9ao�r.;;, ` WN-9 a I ' � 1�2 — Broact,� i —I �; — - - � — ; Malton w �a6 . � .: I � � PlOS = .o r � _ � — ' � � �B�Qadwny%_ ,. � � �` . _ . N -3 - � �n ` = - r� -- - � s � n �� ' � - w W � � W 2 � � -: -` i _ � �°�° �� -- �n�` Y R-3 i _ A�k�_�� a " WN-6 ' � �Oliv� �, I �, W R�C s• � �s —� - 3 �p,::Nixon i vai�►ey � - G�0 : - „ - .. ix � ,,, , . . � M�+In_, -- --� � t -- - � i . � ,W'=RiveraF�le gQ � � -- k�if!'1rf� �- _ . � i - ; - S - ! �. t�ititt�ti��i»��aY9at=��eirR�t1 'it�t»��t�elt�f�[�II��,��.u��*��i�.if�tiifi�N� t�H�t��it �I��i��t� �lt - -: .--- � � 1 ' � � .. �� e_2Sth� Legend :, \ ' Y � ,` � • '� � _�mj WCSPQP � �� f � _ �� zan, PC�PID '� � 1 � . c � wci� d� . g � � � � _ 8 � � � wC 5-2 � 31 r '"' I �� ' < �- � WCS3 r r�C�7•5 V _ _- ;�� 'It��1�1��1 , � � � : � �, � 4 , =N C � � � � +' I'� � wcss � r—� �, � , 1 , �� c �•/l� � � o - �►�� ', s S �o,� � I � `� '' ��►� -` -� � s . � , \� � ,� �, � �4 �� ' � ° 3 �-- T -� l, ��,,�' a� � �' � I �r,� � ` � � y��',�. � I � ,r— = - 'P �,, \` c � �.L__ �� . _ '�9t�v � � � ` ;� ;� '�� w� � ;�; wcs,�-� _4,n�` cs-� � ; . [�'�� C LDR N �♦�� / � - 'Z' �^ (�\�� Y� �+�� ! ` ° o \'" VNC$•2 . _ �.�, _ j � �t3� a � ' �_,� , , LbR , � ' E ., �. • � . � 46M � ,� o wcsr � � � _ Ta� .5��1t�1 � a 4�th 4 �1 r +�� _ C � � ; 'r � _ - �.t1 �� . _ Hohr�►� �. � Fe�sr °� r.` wcs-s >. , wes-� � N C ' c �. > l �� t� i _� �. • '��, ' �� _�_ `�� J� .� �� -- ~� •. A� �Il cs-� � ral outh t S - � � ��s�LDR _ '` � .+� ' . s��, � ■ ��t�//tMi�� tt� Ksf H� I/I/�I �� Nff� ��i � - - � �Ic ( _ --� b25th � I� �- 2:�h on � n = ��fo� _ : _ � % G '� .; R �� : �s .� '�►� --�7th : , � �° ��h > - �!� � ' � � �� -_ �� _29th � ��° = Leno� � - ... Q � � � `D � r � i r 0 C � M Legend ��.�� WCS = 32nd � A (— r �+ NC � � WCSPOP � ;m � �'�-- ---� -�'--� I _34th �,.� _� �. P�PID ' �c+ s r a ��S-6� m p a +� �� \� \ "• �` — � �. wcs-, � PIO � . �. �... �- 0 . � - r � (� WCS-2 �\ \ � �'� � a � �= �o� �� VY�CS-3 � '�Z , �,� `�1� � ' _ �� ; - '�'' �"S` � � O � �-� �� a � _ � 9tb' , � � •�, . � � VNCS-5 � 0 ,� � '�; cn� � WCS+ wet � �IVCS-3 � � � � i � ` �_�� ''C -.;�� R-3 ' \� I : ��' - � iC •�� `'� �� -- � � \� . � � � � � � '`,�� Q� ' ��u�► � „ b � �!�� °'' �; � %' :.<3+,d 4? - WCS•2 : u , ;' �� "� o�� R 2 ..J c -� .t E o : Q � � A', � � = �'� >_� �"1_ - � �--� _ � . � � 4 r � � �� °'� � : / �t�` � r�•y n **� -•, �rt � ... _�HolmAn.�--. , '0� s '° 3 r r ' o _�-', t; i � � ��r ti�� ,- ��,_Fa � t � ' �1 NM � _- �� 7��. WCS-1 _ ` �.�� R-1 •�� .. o ;� �i�r��tt��t� ��i11111 ll��ii�� ,��.1��1��I��I��It��1��1�1�� t11�i��M� 11�� •` �, �� ''�4'� `�wc� � - __._._a�a______ 1 � ��- _sns _ , ; , � `'� �� — ------4tt' CMU��. � -- ` - °� - 4th ' " � Y I � � � � • ` ---- - - — -- � � s� f � O � i \�'� , ?� wc-a � � � �h---_.: i ' . _ " �� ` � --� HDR ' _.�cn_ ,-- � � '� �� , � ' ' 7th ' � �m � � � ath � ��ath S — � -- 111 �/� P � v� � 9th � . . --� .� � Nine : •( .. . r ,o i � 1�t w �/C-Z 11th -- � �3 � � I � '-� °�� LDR ° � nn_ _ � � - =-- �Zw 1 `�► N � �� '� � r � " ♦ � '� I � x � i \L ` _EIrO � � � , �I `� 1-� r � �n ` � " ,,�% � �. � ^ � _,.m_l ,, � 0 1 --� � ,, ,�. . � �` � � - ,�� _ , h � ,�, W st Cent�a � `� � st . ` 1��4�� , � . �, - • ' �, � 1 T. � th_ � : � Legend , � . � WCPQP � h .,� PcPro : � �'.�� ,�°� �� p wG, ; � —20m — � . f1 � � i �Jf Q � � W�.2 I . � �• � • � wG� i � `, I ' � � � , �� I � � W �"` � � r ; , I ; za�a WC-1 za� � � "_� p �, � � -� ��'/ihhl� �I/I� fi /�� li��E�-�1�1��1/ � } 'ti � -- ,� •s�-�•��t�i��t��w��i�� '�. � r r�'�t1�.Lt;'I W C-3 - - - -_— �rd ' �i � --�b - � �; � � ► -- - _ ath LCMU� i _ �_ .' . �' - ~ .�c 3,, LJ � 'M 3 � � "'a _ =` � 5th - � - q ! � o �� \ = y � , �- -� 3 `,` ' WC-d ;—. � rd eth —�- � 5th .r N � ; `� '� MF-2 I __ - � _�Ztt�_ _ — : ` � � � � - � " r rr . � T/h t . u i `� � 1 �— � �t�� 1 '�, � � atn _ _ � � � � e n ��t� y� � i .• I � '\��` A_ �h ! __ � . _ --- � Nin�'I � � : • • _= �1� = I WC-2 11tfi — � � �n .�. I �.— p� � � - p t � . � � , R.3 3 .. � � '�j \� 2th _ - - ,�i, 1 � �� — t � ' � � • '� � — E u�r �, I �� ' � — �� I ` 1 a 1« — � y .��,� ��. M � ��,_i �� +�► �� " � � � . Legend ' r� �� W� t Centra �� "� � . g � �, '� �. 1� ��: 1M�POP 7��1��- : - — ; : � -!4 POriD � � � � 17.th �`�. 0 �"� i � � � ' •.�F �`� � • � �-2 � - � - "�-� :� ,, �' —�- ' I�c • .� - wc.s � �' - -- �+ - � • �� °' _ _ �. �_ i \\ ��3'� ' - s p ♦ � 21st � �� ; � � ': � � . � ' ��. � : - . � , , . : � � i � Z� wc- - � ` '; o z��tL.;' - _2 � o n i n ....�..,, .,,. �,...H ��. ...� , �.. �,. � , ��, � � - � � _ �, - � - o� Le��r�d ,� 11'��I'�-� �C �� '� � � PJ�S � �Q� �,. � ,� � �� ,c� �, � � '� � �. #N�F�Il�� ' � � �.�r � ��ra �!�I��-�= : �._�� '' - -� ��.,�. �--�--� �t�C' `�'�� ti�rcrr-� �� . � •'�' � _ - i ��; - - �_ � � � �� wrcti,? �„� ��r��, � �`� �` ,��' WCN-3 �' ��r�a� �� `�' � 4'!'� w . �^1 � � a�as � �"� ' - �4 �"►�'� ' � �� c �1� 1v _�� ,s-'��` �� '44�C1�7.�1 � � �� `�� T'� ��"'� . F � � � �� WChs� "a � '� � ��L� ��i`�:.� _ j '� -� a � � wG�,t.� y- ��`�" _»�4F�Irv �. � � wCrt-7 ' F f�rf �� v Grac�,�— uck�� I �� , v � � � wG�-0 C: �� _� - � � _ , Y_�1_�l�i�C� � � W��1�9 _� �� #�' �� 4� ��-_� _ �- _�� '��a � � . � '•, �'.. �� a.; ' � � � ��' � �f�� e 14 k� � T " . �o � ,..��1� ' R. ` �,�,b�� ''� � . ; - -' _ -.. -.� `, � .�'�_ 1 �` �,� I�_ � �.._ ' � `... ��7"[) � `-'� �;r � �eT15'fl��! ''�� , y ; , �� r� x � � � ' I �_ _ _ Knox.� k - �_ < <�7r r� . �-- 't7�'�,. � �? �' — �'�I'4�4�li� .��1.Y-� �m►an ? ��lan�� .�__�_-��_�� -� 14� S � �� ti r� � — �� _ � ;___ ``z� �! .`��10�`�� "�� p _ . r ,rn _ _- _ I di � � i�9� � � . � �'�� 4.: - •Neira ,. _ � 6�lduvin� ��'�� - -_- � -_-- _ ■ ��L-0�°-�- �'�] - _�*�� __ -�- - ,�_ .r.if• � _ .. �,� '� -. - - � �� _-�"� �' ��'�-� �..� � ` �! � �� - �. _�..� � .. I ..- '� -<,�._ I_ � __ �� I � t��trs. ,�`�' � f� � I I �' _ M}rs Qn� I � , k � _Mfealdr�-- � � - . Mis�si� _�� - - — - •-,�� .� � 1!}�'tal�� a� � u �- M � �x��- ',�� ,; � " -- �n - � � � � � � � �. `� �-- � �. t # �� _ a : �; � n� �ie.�ar��a �` - � � . � w r ,� � � h � , � '� f— - o �d�m�t ' � �' fl � ek ,s �_. �� .� ,:�= a�tatd�i ' �; � " — � � �sn � � ��:�..� E �, , ; � � �t I la ! r. � � � I m ' ��roacfw . . , �.� , � , . � _ . �.^ � ,� � «��!�"�'! �.. { � �a . � *� • P.� � fl tt � � � � �,i�•F .� s � l �-- � I i�• l Ilv� , - Y1��-� � i � i �� rr � - "� Va�1 F � o' �fI.�Y'�r � �_ �----�- - --- }�p , ry -�- • �� y � ��I.tf'�� ' . �w � _ G�— � ° lf 1f � 1 �1 � E I � � � � �� k � � ' +p ` � � 5�� r� n 1►�a1 ` � ;� `� :�° ; ��'� . , ��.r�e :� `�-- I n � �" + c� m vet� � � � i - � _ y. , f4!ttsl . . . .� � - -�' ---, : � r� , � � _ � . -- � . _ ��+��- - --�---- � i�—�``-�-�--`-�. ��_�-,-�-�------- ° � - �, � ��1�'-��n� � _ �: � . � -- ��_ r� ura �" ? _ .�` � � �,� � ��._ � �� ' � . �" `. �-=�` �^ � . ' ��`� I?`��3� � � �Y.�.. ��AQ � �. _ �� - �� 7 ��7 �.��'� -- � � �� . .� I � _ '� �- �: � - -' , � � �'' �, ,a�h � 11� IJ_ _ '; � :�t _ , - � ��► 4t� �, ,� .. �. _ t� � i 4 � ; ,� � m- !�! +� ■ ��.'�'� �� J � � m-_r � ��e�il � � � � ^ �f�S �� ? � r�' �i e o�kvre I � � W�NPQ�' � ��•• � � �� a � _;� �'�!�'C N+� _i � .'� �" _ !' - a �� _ _ - — - �' . PQP��t �.�� F (1�'1 �1 � `'�' �� y'` � � �� ' r � '�'�'�-� '�O�lfi,� 1 �'� - . s ;� �'1 ' _. r' � `.,_� �� V+� h9_� ,�1vp� ,�,�; # � �� 'r � �� ' -_ � - � ` � = s � �a �,��, ,�`�� v�N-3 ,� ��►'�' *"� �"° - " � C E�i-�` a,�,� � ,,� � �'�� '�� _ � � '� � �r�-� � :��— * � V1�+�IV-7�"��;!r� d�,� �`� '�t q .. , " '� �- � �_3` � c v= _ _ �. . � � 4Y+��S(�� _ - � '•�. � �� - -� .r �.-ai �,� - �1+�-�i �' ��,� �'��`; � � �'ar�c�_ p ��;-� '� � '�' 1 '� a �'�'�` _ _ . —_� :� � � ''� „ .. � � 4'V�C�I--7 k � �..#�` ��3 ��'� . r -� ,� : ��- � ,. - � ��. � ��1�'1�P �`�I �� .+� � YVr�ChI-� +- ,3 c�s� �ar � , � � � y � . ��#iste � � F-�" aT r� � r ^ ta► `� b ` � r j , .4 � , � ��: , ^ ,. "° �. �'�CN-9 �� _--: �--�. `'�r�t��m�ty .._ '� ml�� -,_., sk. •, , .� ,�'.� � �, - 'M !d � - . -.- ' � � _ ` _ �,f4an�sf� _ �- . �s' � - I � � � K�l7� � , �- �:,�/�_ re .. � �, . `` � f � , — .r �( CfiC . + _ � � � I r.. _ ,�, '� " ��' - _ 3�� i � � � w �tr t7�1�1:] - - — �JJ' ! � � _ _ — -- —'_` _ _ .- — " ,,. — � _ P_ ,,_� -r�-� , . sft � � � � ��a,� ��,� r� _�� o � _ _� _ _ �'� ��.t=1 � �., � � �,�_ � �� __ �-_ _ _ �i1� _ r � �s� � ,� '�'1�� . � �; s �.�.� �� -��-_�'�sr�. . _. � , �,a, .., �1=v -. �- _ � - _ _ - �� _ _ . , ��,� _ � .-- 1�'t _-�- �_�� - � �� ; � _ P 9 _ !^`�N'�w_ __ � '` � '� �f�ra � -- � � ��-� � ' �t� . `a..� �',�� ; °_� � � ... -. . : . �� _ :. . ., � .�c�u�u �: ` 's` � � �If��l�rt i �, � ��'� ,��' _ �� M1L�l�.r�.� � " . _�. �1�li��i�r� il� : � �— -.,, � , , - � .f. � ;. �..�.��9!' � _ ,+�: '�'��-•`'-- - � 4 --�'f�ll � �-''� � i � 5irr'�.4.. — � ; ; �.��rstes _ - - � � � >_. � � �� T - "'�- �` —" � " _ _ ''' � J 5�� " � � � �o+�r� =�-' , . : � ,��q � �_ _ � � �, � � . : � ,�-. �, �i�. � � i ;��rss+rt � — � °� _ . �� + .,.. � - � �, w.. � ._._ I � , � r' f �t�tl _+P _� - �" ° ° ' Q�ar� , � � i� ` `^�� , � �, v'� allt� � �� _�i l� _ , -- � ''� �a�w ��, ��.�. �11JC�'+�l=T �V� N �3 � _ �:.� - , ,. �,�.�- �-- .; - � . y � { s ri�� .� �� ^ � t ` � - � ;. ,�,� -�• _�fkl�. ft _ �.,, 1 � ' � _ a,� � r�'l�15�1u 1 i nifv�►,� y_'' � � -; � � '�^ � _ N�xo� � �''�1�1r�`L � ��- � *� � �,rayf � � �° �� -- L ��-�, .� �� ^ ��I� �r � � �, �kAa��r� �; � �� z �s_ 9'SP�`'�r �.� - , � ll�ral ��., r= � �` � 1 '�f�1 ±�r lde � � �-�'-- � O� � � � - �„�. . ��:, �5� �' � , � � � _ ... � � � � p�. '� . . . �- •.. �1 � � 4 �� V �7 3'+ ; � _ � 'a _ � _ _ � ��. �C7 _I r.�.. — �j e s�� -,.: �. � -��; � - - — � ---- ��-�—;� �, �� ,.�� ,� ,� �_ _ � , ` � �` ��, - �t_ � ' � �, � 1 � � _ _ � I � k7� �e I 4.' � � � � �y �1� � �— -- � � ... _ ' � �.. � �� r� - '��tew�r�Y`�1--^ �=--= � , ��rrrf��i�ir�'�Y'��'��+r� . � � � ��ir�'��-��s�� +�� ;�T . � � � � �' _3��f �� " � 0"��'�� . ��. �I1�G�-� a �. � �{_ - _ ,af�---� �tn I� �C� � ._ �_ ' --4tr��. ` . � atn � ��'� �-- � � � - - 1 �I �tr� _. � � , a '�� Le��nd �� -�-�� :� '� --�i�, � ��CPiPf�1P � II� � � - - ' _�?u�n �,.,, '""" � P+C,1P1T� � � � � �D rr�.it ` , � ��' ��.�- �E� � _t � . c, 1�Y 6�� -� oe ��t Vt��IJ�� ' I � � � � �e�-� � � Braa ' Ym i� � �� -= � � � �� I� ; � _ �'al# � �� _ - �CN.3 �,' "� �`+�' � +�1'i4Y� � � � S�. � � ei � �PGr� � � � � � �a� �, � � `� ' , � ' , .�. , I .� c.� . - � ��F3�5 a `° ` � � � ' � � � �IG�i I ,�+v! �� I , !�I �� -{ +--��.' �* �� , � � � � =.s� EChT�B � � � � � T ' � I �� _ i�+aC#tw+2_ - �L �V �U' ,� � � g -�-[►�..9 T!� �L..� �' 6 - __ , •-�' � � II_ +� ° � �, . � c� � ' m l � ;� �, ., � � '� ,� t� "!�, �d't ' � �R.��:_�. ,'�" .-�� .da � �� - � `��"� � � . s f 1 #� + : �,-- ` � � �. f 1�1 � , � � , ; ��r- �� E � �I -� � I � � r'� � - � �d�,srr��i � � �*' ,�, f �� - - �- �-- . � _ '-' � ` �' � - � ;�`' _ �. ��'��` � �. � � � `� � +^ , � ��s�ust af � 4 ,p,�tli�4'��' � �_'- �'l � � ` P�rk_�C _ � •� � {-� : ��'ei ` �� "� � ��t°'�`=-,-t ;� --T � l:�'ark D ; '� � � � � �. , �,�` �1� �``� { i� � ; I �n�c�alrl�f F=.: v a � � =�"�� r � �'i �''ti ' � i. i�'ark.�.—l' .L � a � �r � t �u. !i� � � __._ C +e } � ,�� Il,� " , �:_,.�---- � �-� � � ��f'�C � �',r� ', ; � � x , � -- F�Ir+v�sw � � �� ! I+�dt�ri� � e ``��` - - �'- _�_ I � __- . ��rY`� � +.'� � _��. � ; k� - ��i��1 - ;�I�� ° 1 �� — � �a� Ml�fi� , ta x �rr _ �, .� � i i��' � � y. a � ' � �.�". `' � �"' _� � �_� � �� hJ-� ` � � � � �� *'� � :'' ° rlr' � � � ; ��l'��ls '� 'r r�i� !Q � � � � �� . � � \ j � *� . �, , v � �w ti > "�� Lr� S C ,� ,�,� " � � �' � C �, �� ', � a � ; ,�� -�.-. . . �a .� Mens � . y �-�,a -.�,�- ,$�� +�,� � � � �` i 5 annp�r� - _ - - �T+d��4�� ,��..; � , � �-- � � - - "�, . 1 - _ . . _- -- h , 6 s�l�p 3_..._ �� Q - P'�0 1'�0 � ��'`� � a� � -_`J- a >� .�_ dR 1 g� `-� v "�, `a`� 4r4►2��0 � � - ----- � �f - - --- - -- --- ... �� aT' -� � �( �'' _ ;�� , i�_�� Q � ��,,._ _ __ — _ � _�a� �,. #�� - I�r a� � �=�. -� � � m � � � �� - f�� ' 1 . �r a � . `* �> .. , ,, , , • __-� �� 1- -� - —�—�' �, '� ` � �' M1asl��r '� ` _ ' ._ I_��aia�r _ � __ — ^ � � wM o �`°I I �� ■ �' � � Le�e�d ��w��i��.��r�. - � � ��T�+�IRQP' � I � � Fv '� � . — 4u � � � I � _ � � �� ,- �' _ L � � ° �- � -_�� ' - � ° � � " - �� C�- � r�� `- �p,,,� r � � ECN � �� ' y V11 � ' � � e m i � �� '�'L-'"ty7 ,.L_ � �ClI-� E B1`� ,� !m �' �� . ` '4`"...��t� Q�a ,�ilV�r[Ce� � �Cl�-1! �'�� — � - ��,� � r° �r �1�e � � � � � � � _ � � ,�,�_�, � �_- - �cra.� = � °�. ' � � � o� r . � � . � � � R� :hr .�� ti, � ECN-3 �� / � � ' � � J � w+� �'�'� r �I�, �, �' . � � _ � Rf�h � ��—_ "� - ._ � �� {`H•6 f �� .�� i�� ;� ,w�� t7c�� --��` � — � : #, �� E.,i��ra � � .fCl�'.'. "�� p;�� , _� �.�� -�� - �� a � � +� � � � i � I tar i � , � _ _ � - _ � �k�d 11'��t�l �1 ,,�''� ,� 'r� _ _-- - _ . - - � � � � � � I r ► �-�' - - • — � ��?.;��k_A�� , ,�a�� 1"� ��,-.�' -- - -- __ �� }�u�trClil '� "` � p I� _ � _ �i �rk 13 , � � _� -� �•_ _ I �� ' , �� , � - _ _ - _ a -� ---�- —. � � +� � t�ldu�tr�� - ct'��`"�� • � � ` _ , �. n�i � _-,� ` P' r� � '"� _ , ,r� �� C . �� '� � �� I�sdu�trle�� P ..� '�� . �_.�- i ��'��-�`'-I-*. � ---- -. � — —�?n rk � � � ;'� � �. . , " � �, � � � , � � � I �rtc{�st+��l � i a �.` ;� `', �` *� P�r1t.�� - � � rc �� 3-' ,��k�a��3 _.,ry . , � iN r �1��` k� I - -- ��.�` - _ _—��s�f��! � — i �. ,�. � c � � � � � �j `� y .R ��. � °� �r�dar�c . � '� ,w � � �` � � � � '� � . . � z __� Fafs_'9+`i�v' _ ,�". � �� =� �4�'�++'I�'� �_ � r' - -- ' - y � y � _ _ .� R �� r � �1� � ..�. V\P�_- � - � __ �� _� ��'.��.�.� ,� �� ,�,�,_ _ � s � �- J41�rta !■ � .. y _- � . � ��,r�� _. � �- . �, , � � �' I � I '�r°_��-� �� . -_ °.�, �� _ _ - - = ,,� - , _ �- i 4 . L .° . I .. 4� v � � - � a ' ry „ � " , .. _,- _ M y .� . .=' �.�^�--- � ��rl��r - �? .,� a � �' G > � _ � � �i w i �� . �f ' - � RL �. ':�,.r ��i�h� i � ++,� ° �C , aw - � � ��# � ��`"' # � � � . , - ��`►1� � r�_ . � `" _ _ y � �11�r�}34f�`�� f '-` - . � �� 5hen�r�n � - °� �n{�M1t�� _�_�� . 1...�'.�, - ��°— �'` �_._.� _�T�IAf1`A ��— __ _ -_�'�'„�- - — `;� � r .J�_' � i �� - ° � � ,�. �-,�r..,..__�+3t� y. ._ t ,: �—P 9� E 9�1 � ,� � �_ �1 � � �� r�+�.� � Y � l_� �'� # i ��t3!�N � . � - - -_ -.ti_. --_ � .. - - ��us�� .�-: � ` .. f � s. m �`�,� `� ,.-�" ,,, ,�� ;.� ��,� ± : . . - � �' � �l. . , . ;` � �� : �- _ Aug � '� , ,, ? ��. i :_. . ; ;� :... . - I�Ils�le�t _ � , - - � �f ��f � � �" �il�s�l4n,� +� � � �- � . _ _ ��' . �— -�- - - -- _ � � ''`fi�i i 'i'��i�'I�`� Iit��t�� 1111 `��I��IZ�t��yttEtl��ii� w29voN `� Legend -� � � _: _ — - �. u,�a - ---- - — - -- - _ .= —� _ ��- - � � � � �Ze� � �,'��" ,' ` ` � --_� '��♦ '� �� p ECPQP -�.°�- lEC.g - _ !�N ' �EC-5 •._ __ ; �!s�ii- �90 roM� `� �`` RC � 0"��p.�,� - E �., .� M�s�l�,,___ .� � EC � - - - - ,_ � - Ec.z _ C i i I � �� - EC-� � a_ ei - `� � � � � Sltit4_ � � � ' �- :'�A�/!s8 '� ��I� ��I EC•t � �� lC i� � C -. ��D/1 \,� -� � ht l o � h � �� _ EGS '.��' - • � � � I r c+ � � � :� EC•5 --� �� __ - C � � � � � � \ _ _ i� ss ' ' - . --_ .,� etaltfo_.�— ~� I� r c 1 tA/ � � EC-2 � �o, . E � � " 0 � EC-3 �a»4� �, '� � - . HDR ' � ~ .. " �'B � — -- i Brondwt��- - _ . _.-� . .. _. y • I `� � � `� ' nc�flel� � V � � O �� A � � �� `�C-4� - --- � � ,� rr : o„�c LDR � , _ , � � v.�Mnwe,► — - i�-- — - - - - .�-- • �, _ Nlxen � • —i—N17c \ ~ c °� Rlvorsld� � � � I - �°' � ?� �� ` c Msin � �,'�`_ — rs ds � � � � 1►�ersid0� �� I � L � A ; A m • � � • � �. Sp�ayue _ . , _ _ _ _ _ _ .i - -- � � �-T- ----- S p�g� —_� � -- � '� � EC-1 � � � ,sc = .� 19t � o � �. ____ � g C M V _ Znd � ��f111//1��/��111��11��/�� /�/�11��1�/11� �� 3rQ c � N a 3n�_ E � z 3 -- ` $ a � a h � - n � ' �th s z _a� _ _ _ ', � —�_ .__ _ ___.�- - -�" ±a Legend sMrn+«+ . � _ Indiin�_ --_ - � :� Zo n i n _ _ � _ - _ ___ _ _ ::�, g �� -- _� �- �, ECPQP � �, t 1 ;��ora��l��t�� nnrnu�rrti.r.rrrri�r��t W290 p� W PQPID -:� Q�-- _ - -- - - -- -. _ _ �,� - __ , E C ■■ E�_, � � � � _ '�..��E� � '�EC -5 .� / z ;EC-6 -�-��, { ��9 0 � EG2 ' J � _ � RC ��'-!±!�� - �. _' _ . _Mlaslan _ _ k- `�`___� r `-!+! � + ��r� y � :-�, EC-4 � --��xw�► -- -• `!r �� Q � � m � � - � • j►rrj� - EG5 � � � , � Sirtto__ y I m �, - _ „ � .Ml$�1 F��Fj - EG6 o� 1 E c ,p ` c '�.�` � .� . . . >'� S�� . o � . � � - -- - - � � �'- . /// . . $ I _ i_ �: ` _ ,,\. _ i � � �= �� , - -. - - -,.-- .� -.:i,,� �: . " - - .', � %,• I j V � LJ ' . � �.__-�� y �. Il - � � EC-2 � -- i _ — �acstd.- � �� ' -- : - -�.�:-_ _ � � = - � � i Go EC-3 �allQ - '° �'\ 1 � " - � � �� MF-2 , � . ' � � : � � ' -- —� -- -- - — . — : u, n� fl � � Q� �, ` ar� � _� �. " � � _ , EC44 � � oi�,re�_ } - = J � ,R-3 � � - �;-=- �� - - -_,:r - -,.--- — � '"j Nlx � . c +� -%�,. .- �'11 °' 4 ' � r� - i c �tivqnide :' � �� . a -�, _ I m � - :'� . . ''', ` � � --�_ � . � c i° _Riversi4e �o •��.� � . Qivorsldo , ° t� m j ' ��`� � � ., � ,` , � I� � � \ `��:`� ��\\�. i . ;-< t .�� . � -.\�. �. .. � :; , � ' �v' : - - � � -- �,�_�r.��,� =. ��' �-�� = �;.-? v� ' g� - �" --� -� Sp�9uQ — . . _ c� :�, � �- � ; - - , I R � E C -1 m ,.�— � - .. �st i � � � - I� � � CMU Z - ��r�»��ifr�r��r��r��tr�tmtntYn��r�� s�i � _- �n .d �..-- W 3rd ' 10 �— . I _�___-��- _ _ . . _ ' � . "�_ . I . O �� 1 �� ( � � � r �� _ 2 �.- �.� � E S-5 � ��t� t,r�� ECS� i�� t� �' ° � y i- " : �ca_, - - � C M U � W .� ; � �D� � I �. � �g"' - � s m 4tn Legend � � . _ � u� �--� - t 4 i -�, �- �--_ � ` � `� 5th_ � , �-- 'a Sth �YS�I -,- �. �`,•' r � 1 1 C ath ECSPOP � _�..r � � � �+ i � � � � -> t�to �- �--- � i � �: � � � Ecs-t - � ' � , , _� � h , I � , �9 - E�"- o � , ,� I _t0 � �-.-� � �I _, � ECS-1 � o a� 11 t� 1��h I 1� � W ��i � - � � Ea.� , ;- EC-S-3 , s ` E�.S $ I�3��' ,-�S: �E CS - -4 �LDR � r M �--= ,��, ,� � - u, [� Ea.� -� ,- -� H DR py�on g,s_�r,_ � j � � ' 0 � 1 ath � i' ` � � _ � . � a O ��., p » � � w - 1/ — �� C � �� ' u � y � -,1 � � �i� --1- �9th - � �� /�'" r �' �i , • � � 1 � �. a � r- � .er� <'�,.�� t. � � Sun Q ` Z�s, , � — � ' 0 �� ,. „� - E `6 ro� , � � 2Mh - - v � � � _24th � t� a 4th, �, C r .., I � — _ � � — ' _ zs�n�r.� PIOS � �� ` iq� ° , � ° � : -°�r � v � \ th � J -'� , � � ' 2gt ` ._29th ~ � u.�� .enora 1-� e � � � c� �' . � i 1 � � 3 nd 1�H1 � t• �� a v • .r. � aacn_ - s � � �� , « , � � � �,} ° i�aa � .� J� � � : �,� , a� . � �' . � � ' �iiC � � E S-� � A { �� _ _ ! ► 1"' - � --- .—J � C - "� d EC:S-6 -`�-- , —i tsi �- c ' -- �I t.t 1�.—i U ° ��MFr'��1�11��r��y�tr��t� r 0 � ��ay '� �u � � !�I . I , tiw � - -��'_ I �:.- � 4 : I a�. � „ dth ;S�rY'°, , �ltb m W .» � _ � ,, '� ��- � � � g �� f � � � � � ' � � I sN � ah nh d ;r---- --� s�$ � � R1d� •- � Q atfi � � � �� M �, 9 � ; , - � � c a S _ t/� ;• �, , 1f" - --' h o o� o =1ah_ q �aLc -� 1or t _ �" o `a = v i 1 v � � � ,.. -� , � 1 11 � - . a , � i o 12th �' � _ r' j a ,�n,_ _ � `�- - ECS--3 , —'_ � � •. �� c � ,� � �, _: � �, � EC-S-3 LLR.3 r � ��,_ � ��`� ,� � - ttion , � �--� —� ,�, a 1 ttt � � -- �� =3 �' � 4� 7 5m' � � � ;� ..� ��-- , e r �_ t - � e � ; ��7f11 � .� o E� i , o .. Ttl� q � 1sm_ .��. M � /o �� ' e 1�� ; � - , 7ath � `� °� ' � �� . � i � ' , �-- -/ � � �'�o�, e!►1 -� J � ---� � � pth � � Q � �,1s�1�. �. ��r � .� � - `^ _ c � \� ~� .' � c ; � � � � M � • �_ � - � ~ T ..c�� _Zatn� _ � ; 2�ch - , _� � _� ,�� 25ch G4 E . ,, , (- . / �--- �'! r - - s`"'„ ��t�� ■�� n� �, � — - �� PIOSr � ��■r�+C ' �rn .;� �° ...�.� r i ,S V/ / �, ''., ', _ . l � s � �A - 29th � c I �' � ° _ : o� r: � ►.+ `, � m �� _ ? Leg�nd � „ � � "' � � I 8_ � � '� �- � �`� � ■ EC3PQP 1 � – ��t �i�t�' , ronc ' ��- � �th� � ( � � I Ecs-� � u � "t'" p�.�� . /J � � ��' a, �I �'s � - EaCS-2 � � � /'•�� R , ♦� �Sa ��► J �� ., � � ��r� 3 � ` � � 6CS.6 �, '`. o �� ,�1 � / � r , „ � Ecs.s �, ' � R-2 � �� I� � 4smet r � N ._�'�� '�� tt -- r : I \C��a/d 190 � p � � ES-8 '��i� i��d:� �e��'� Legend � a M 1�n w J � F �� .� Bro�dwey— –.� � � -- – s td .4��oadway ` n9neid � ``_+ = ESPQP pL r�q . c ° ' � PCPID I I E � Alkl - � � � t A � � � = � Es-t � � � �� N � � C O Q �d .�_� � � �n�x�� ' G�►`�''� �' � �-� P �ti `- � � -, : E,.z ; Vslleyw � � _ � �ES�7 , r l— N � � E5.3 1 i � ' ' W -- CMU " ES-6 T ` �� °S. A�a` � ES-5 = � I - R Id1l� � s-s _ � �� MDR p � II �. � � - _-.._ sR�u� . -- p ; �� C ! i� j "°' Q Es-s � � �..��- _ �� I� � � � E�7 n . �_ ; f � � � _ ES-a r � a �, � * 4th + � �ES-4� � scn a � � -� � ' , a � C9 � � T LDR � �� sit r, � ° . � i � oZ � � � � � �* 't� �� - Y� I M � � � � � �N � ��---' J�t� ! r 1ff� ES-3 � � �� ' r, � - o� �ow�� •�� oen __,� ��'°� - � � LD . . � I ,� � ��ii�� . 1�' �, � �2tnl� � I� � n �� o � � ,� � ,r , 3 a' ' _ � � .� � t � r •_ a ESL�~'srti� ; ES-2 : . �� . �ecn ` � LDR � � ; . ��.��R��.�� + ,n � ��•. �- � h � � � � �_ o m �.�. �, �� ` �'�o� ;� : � �� - ,,, ��+.,. � a �'� �'s��y �► � ' � =��f��a�, ' ,► ' ( � , ♦�� th 7th � � I � - Descr�t i' - � a �; ��a` ��jtttii�i� 1 ` � � 1 if� �' . r�. r� rafdo l��ii�. Legend _ . � M!! /i� ■iilIJ�i �l �l1� ��aOmi �a . ES-8 , � _ -�F g o_�'� . � ., � ,. -;- � � ESPQP oc � G O eroadway _� .;,.� Bt��aaway Sp�ingt�ld ,_� ; c E ngi��ld I-':=._ ; � � PQPID ' w � c r a — � � ti � � ES-1 � 0 � � � Q� � � F� � N � � � � � __ . � �e� � ' : ..n., ES-2 �� o o p , N ��l --- _�� . V4{IOYw+� ES-3 � ----� - - � an x , - r '" � N�Ani � ES-4 I �--� � _- � ES•7 S-6 Metn 0 v ors�cso � `� CMU E ` R� � � , � ES-5 L � _ » ES v _ , _ � .. C g�gu�_ - - - - -----.—� -�- , -- � ES-Q _ ... ' �--�i � �c ' c � - ES-7 .: -'' 1 h `� � � � - ES-8 "- •► , � � o ' - 3 � � � � i � i� I ,�- � th '�" ,� � . - `- � � s � - t�--,� +�_ � �i 5th � E$-4 � ,. �"/� j � ` ' � � � '� R-3 6th ' �� _ � � , - � �!_ _.�1__ u 0i� �Ve��e� `� � G� ar � � c • _, �� r � �; a Rid9C � � I� � d i '� �_Qth_ ``��-� � �, �,8� ,,�I�� fi��1� �� • ES-3 - � 9 GS , ' � �••� -- -� � ,� _ - � Ri � ��th ;�-. ., � ��''••;�� ' _; � �� h a � � T " � �1tth ; ' '� a _ � ��ii� �. ` � � �—=' % a . � � ` � .�� ` _ 71�„ - i � ;o m ' � �� — '� - __ - �-- i t,3t 'h�h �� a w� `� _ - " : cr a �--_. � 0� i : � .— ES.� �- �• _. ES-2 - — g� — - t 3, � 16th `_ � --R-j2 �-';: ��a��R��r��r � i '�� ,--� o � . �.• on � n � ,h � .dr— , �� R �J �J � �`` J fr � � � 1 � t ✓ �a+� b�` � 1 ��t�� 4 ��D /� �� V �'� �2 �,��'� � �'6�� .? ` ' � - �.,tA ' � � l .� ! �� - o' .� ��? J 11�� Ih� : / � ' �� ■ � �� ' ��,� EN-3 �� _ � � '�,��1 R-3 ast vaN �� : o n i n °� - �� '-r m � ;� � - �t±�r B�a '�'"? r` _� � �'1i ••��```��''•�•� � Legend _� �' � � '" ,-'�'-° c �. t� ` � � H rv � - ENP�P � � _�� eEo UD�a^n o' L nqfeil N�'v �r--- t t�� -. .'. •!� � � PCZPID Y � �� Rith - `�....�..- � 11�� : —f � � � - r z. ;� _ _ _� � � e.t �� -� , - EtV-1 �-- �� - - I-1 Tren't: =_��-- _ � i - �c� .4�:-ti. _ __ __ � - — - . � _ _, �'-" -� I � • EN-2 w .\��'��\ � - _ • � o � � Q EN-3 _ � - � . r• -�cestrial � . a�t � _,__ .. � _ , ��kA � QEN-4 Ihdustr�al � A � ' . �, Klema _ P�a�k 8. ' ��o T � - EN-5 -� • ihdustrial I� � : - �� .. � �-- . , � . - � p��kC; r ' �4u�iand � ' ; i dustr�al ` a r � !� � ( ' ' J •�- + I G —' � �_`�a fk D � . . _ ! � « � � m ,,�,�,.r-- � . : � � ' lnduetriai �, � � " I .� 1.��' ' � � , o : � J Pt�rk.�_. � � c a _ DaltotL i � ' �1(ti � ' --� ---,• �ea .. c a _ , � � -� � �, `�,'' ENt4 �� , ' r �� Y � Euciia_ EN-5 r� ewl ��i � F wirvlov�ro a �m- R� � � • .' �c- ° ( - ► - � - - -� 1 � � e' �° r �n _ -- +B�v� - � - -_ � � �1��`� �IIA��iett� -- L � EN.� � - - �`- ±nr� �� ,� " 1 e - P14S,, ;�' �!� ��s,i'd � � °- �=�' � — 'y � � ' � d►� � �. � . � .� �� ' �'t� I�nslB�ld � � �- n' �4. a �. /�� ` h� � i �. - - - - - - �°+vry,� � ; '� Ind1�1� � � 1G�`i�� , aW i �.= � � _ a �� ' L � / o, � All n �� m�n � � "�` � �. ;ii o C � `��.�� r� -� ° � ��_ � � 11 , � � 9 ��'� � _Misslon_ °° � B __ ' �� • � a I . - '- _- _-. _�: . �� ' • �-- � M �i A I � �,y _� ="�''-� - -�-`�., : - _.S�rno EN=2 '�." = y • '� � w a ' �►°R ,�, '�� SQ�-, _ - -- -+ , a f111F-1 : ��j� � �- � r '��. I` '-- " � - - - � "� b � / � ��lt- !� �� Yl' _ � �� \ o ,� m l � � EN-3 ��i�� Legend , M � LD ��► �■.�� '�= - Y .v �s � sct+oo! � ENPC�P ` 8ro — � � MPID �€ — � 4�� L 1 z !t A �t1/'► � �g � I V le_ � I-�� I llt~�� = — EN-t t y „sL N�. _ I ` Jy ��►1�� EN-2 � � � � _ _�/ N��'�'� � �� {v�.-8 O}1�_�1f�--'1'` — i - � EN.3 i - - - , � Q � ., • � ENrI L _,..� I � -�vstri�l i j� = � EN�S � P ark_A. �^ , m � - tridustrl'�et �e � � � eH� -- � Kl�Lnan ; �p!�B_{ ; �3 � �' � � ! � I duatrlal I ,,� : �1 � _ . � _�'s� c, r � �o��a EN_s = ', � 1 euetrtal ,_ _ � � I � r - � fC — —. _ . � ,, � ':.��o « � � � � •� � �� - �� i � tndu trlal �, Q i�� l � �1� �� _ � � � .�.� _ _Park � ' � �� a �A�tton, _ ` ��'` Ild i - ,,-�-� .' — o. . �� ` � �" • � �_ ��a � E N =5 � N' � � _ - om = � �'" ��,�ta-= =' � H I � Y�. � � D t�� J „�k.,re '. � — '� '� ' - � ; ' M p�iect� � -- - E N _ I � � -' �� _ Ir� ��. � f !O I/ ��! g ��sCf� �' d \� 3 � ,� � � � � �'j, ��' � � �� 0 - �.g � f" f � %� Ma c t�+dlarl� � f - I �nr _ . �s�� ,,` ,, e � IndM ` ��`� ;a '~� y / �i 1 r i � f1 M r � � � � a Q t • �� ` � � �.4i? V � �ly � `�'� � QO � a � � ,>. f � — ��:pN�� ' __ I �i � � '� 1._A , a � r --� �� s. � ; � � ��!�rt° � -=ti Sinto_ J� , -2 ��.' t � � '�+ \� - Sht+TJ �a • � I Qg� �� _. `�� _ � _Boone = -�: -M�� t q ` - � � w � � g I �� I I � 190 � � E g $� l ��1�l�� I 11l.H 8 0��-��i�llr � roa�w�y -- •Id 1 �-8��- ■ a er — rans o a �on n.s; � � � n�,•,.�s `�.' `,� �� ' , --,�.�., ��' -,,�' T Map 3.2 ., �1� r � �� . , � Bike and Pedestrian �l � � �� . r � � � System �'' _� � - _ � � r�.�,, .,, „ � " ► ( 3 i-.._:. .� -��_ � � _(—' � :,c_;;_._ i ' " `, i,` ._ { . +e.c — w . ._ �. .�� ,..I�'. �-� '_ fl � � � , F �� i • �� cuy o r : � � � „ .� . � - -.,,,,�--� � , .,, � , _ �� Legend �.�, I' f- � j��/'!1_-�-_- ^ "1: irrnin�, ;�•,,` l�� - 7.1. = r�.� ' � I� n �._., �..� ti(1A�it1/It �� ' /� rrr• � � � w �i rr•at�_�rt ' ' rt. ��{.w•� -, a ■ � . .. � ■ • � � � • .. ` : r �, � �• . _ ' /. = '� � ,� r 'F llk�ti! �OU1s CLs111eat1�M Shkld� ��Ac , . � -+ " � � +,• � r ` , • I.ti11��rarA�RK4�� l)itMsfdA� :. ,, I. �'`�._-- -•- %f°�,lr'_ ( r. ` 1 ' _- - � f . . q� � t � ' .�-� �l �RdUMtfl}I � �..e !� �- ^� y. �,3 _ � 1 w:� a -. � .,�' _�� ,.• - _a , �.- . r ./!�h�� C � sn k��i � �M r;t �t : r - 1 � . . -_ �( �� ..7 iu� l ;3 ��r�� ' _� . . ■ ■ �p�py0e g�1MOd U'!� �l�f `� �� ;f i �, . �� Tmv�"�'n o(��lillwntid _ � I si�.,�n`,�, , 1"` � � — �-- �w :�. i . ,.,. � , .. ,. in _ �+ �� *��4'"-- ';. -r - T- � 1'ur � � ..w �.-L. _ _ ' � 0[l1f111�81��UtM �. � � �_ .�•M�. �� >• Bifu Lam c : i� --� ' . - �"• � .w! e * �s--: -� ' �� F•� '' " � ° ,� ' 4 ��r1t � �.,° , �'�, . i.' ,. �� . . . . 149po..d - _ +� ' ` r � -J , ' .i- , � � � \ �.r;.... � � 3i�asd Slrnd Ro�dw�y 1 . J- � - - �, -_'• .rJ YKM-..1 �- � -Valln��2m�nn f - �., '�4.�' y, � � �=+�;T- ?-,-j� , � U-!' -- � '�,,.. � � �.:i• � �Ci �1of � � — � _�✓ _ ').. _ sh.r.d � � . I - ` .�.� ♦ r�• r � � . 'r y - — �1 , � - t � _ ��. I. � � � -_ � 1 `''t �r C � I �--_. _i- f ;`, � ==�_' _ � � I.if►! f1y f'�dntriin Tatfi � '_�.';— {� �- ,,� � � ! -� `` `' y ' l.ske � ,1 * ; ' - _.. 1 � , ,; rM N.td .� � '� rl'-- - � . � �'' _ � ��• = I' t� � � � ■ pye�pmd f'edeltrnn PNh \ r , � � - ♦ � - � - 1� • l- i� *� • � � �, ��-�� • w + �� Mlf� � � � I � � �. _ . � , f� , :: �-... _n_. �+•• y � -_ + � _ ` m �fi1171i� w�! rc.-. i� . 1-� t � A � ` I DOv�� r � �"'� N � �� --i ► - ^�!� � � 1 . • � tlryprrtrn��}� laatieMip ' _I.. -� _ y� � � � �� .c'4��l�.w � '"� � i - '7�'i; - .r.-._�e._] - r �ffi" j ►�-',�i � IIiH! v •', il ^ ,.� ��Y r -� � � h - .+r « �- � 5... � � • . 1 • �� r * � e a. y 4 �._d p_..r-� '� +�r:T� 1 � .1� ��ir � � � • ! � � SCbOl1M . � ,' __r � 4�.: _ }. _� ,. .. . s f, .,,� • �� . - �- - - - � �� . -r-� t -�L ��. �.� ^.: '� � � I " n1 �' �, . � - �► Wtho�d � iirr y t - - , i y �, �_� • � •, ' I^ ,_ -1 � i II�M � ; � 3My �, ^�.:- � I -�� . ,. � ( �� , \ _ - .=in� ( � - ' � � l _ _ . � � OtherMumetp�litw {� �� - " � f•MI« M •-rvH }-w'r • ^I I a�•�. ► .��r � �,.� • � +' I � �� Y�IptNlf/ � "�' � y i�} - �. ! � { . , . _ �iA' dSpolune V�Uy f l_: ' �T�I�1� ! M� _ �; �;. � - C S � ' �—�Mer4•- .�I/1= DN� r Il�lf� � + � � i ' I � , '1 T, _,� s /� 1 - _ 1 - t1_ , -f �«�_._ ! ' � C �� ` ._ _ - ii4 t�y '"� i Y4if 4 � � �, �+r.,_J_��_ . � I ^ ,--� � -- _fi� �� .`` �.H'�11QrOMR}1/�!M !-w t' � r r 1 �fi.�1.� � � , �� -._. �1 .,lM �� I � �;�,�_. �' } _ I , � �. •, � , _ � .:.� �, � 1 �•'�'r �iNl.- _ t.r -T-i,� c�ts��f\rcwP�tlt �; Y {� �� '�� ^ r �'� �� i W�lO��iN `` � w . ` � i•�ir � .'! �� - °'� Q� � -- �a�ll -�" ,1, T _i -., , , .`.',2'�f _ �� __' I� \ - �j•��!� • 1 1 p f I , i �4 � � . . `� �� : �� `1 1 R ` ,7�q ' � ` � r 1_ UIIL � - 1''� I � .�'G� r - V � -� � . �ra�, . � Z. � � � � l* r ,k,�� : I �a + - -'.r.� '�E •- _ s • `� (� .� _,� � ri.aK ' ., _ :_'1 i�t iR t. ' � -- y--- '..__„�� M�p I.ocation �. �� .. "�e r ' ,�.. 1 �, .-•-, , ''� . ��r ,_��r � � � r � ..1 i ]� ,6�r,+ i � �� :� �'i ,f ►r� - ? ` i d • ` • � IF' � , . �s ' ,l�t ' •� . -- _ �,.,_ �'� • `�t�� ' �,� pMet 1�/1Li00� 6� ' � � • i � 1 ' _� �'.n-(�}; � �"', _ � �" �� n . t � i �. . •�, �. � I � 'w�_ _� � � ' •j ?��!! - ,�� • � . T '� ~ � � ��'�' r. ,.,- ..li ,�y�� A� Q 0 OS I ] AQk� �� `I 1 � � � 1 � � ■ 1 � \_ ` ` _ I �. n, ✓--. I .' M�er' 7M nbkslMNbn alww m I�n ay. u cewqrbJ�an �st�wrt ,r 1 w�re�sr �xf tr inf!N't In eraswt �naawa 7M !'�n � wo �un - i � ', _� I r Curers'Mie� ir �rro�tee aAwM rA► Rr�ti � rNenrr n�fht► wAr arK/ � � n � � aq.udrdlularro �� To r*itA� a+�+ne�' enwner ehr CM� eK4��+' � ntlry, ('e�rn' �`-' � �,��,✓� ^ �� . _ r� � � llnele�wwllkl++r��. /rul.srn/1'6wn� (JDVf 9N•1tl00 � - � , , `_�+r�.. T �c.: � I�.�e�.tMlMf�1�p�\'�A?.t11�+�MtOM�rlwlr�� ■ a er — a � a ... ac� � �es City of Spokane Valiey Comprehensive Pian CHAPTER 4— CAPITAL FACILITIES AND PUBLIC SERVICES 4.0 Introductlon The Growth Management Act (GMA) requires new development to be directed to areas that either currently have adequate public facilities and services, or to areas where facilities and services can be delivered within the 20-year time frame of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan (SVCP). Facilities and services that are required for new development must be adequate and available at adopted levels of service (LOS). Locally established LOSs help to define and contribute to Spokane Valley's quality of life. 4.1 Plannlna Context This section provides a review of the policy directives included in the State's Growth Management Act (GMA) and the Countywide Planning Policies relating to capital facilities planning. 4.1.1 Growth Management Act The GMA refers to capital facilities planning in two (2) of the thirteen (13) statewide planning goals. The two relevant goals are: • Ur6an Growfh. Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner. • Public facilities and services. Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to , support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the , development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels � below locally established minimum standards. More specificaliy, the GMA mandates that the City prepare a capital facilities plan which contains the following components: • An inventory of existing facilities owned by public entities, showing the locations and capacities of the facilities. • A forecast of the future needs for such facilities. • The proposed locations and capacities of expanded or new facilities. • At least a six-year financing plan that will finance such facilities and clearly identify sources of public money for such purposes. • A requirement to reassess the Land Use chapter if probable funding falls short. 4.1.2 Countywide Ptanning Pollcles The Countywide Planning Policies (CWPP), originally adopted in 1994, contain a number of goals and policies regarding capital facilities and the provision of urban services. Those CWPP relevant to capital facilities planning are as follows:' Policy Topic 1— Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) Urba� Growth Area Deslgnatlon Process for New Incorporated Cities: 1. The Steering Committee of Elected Officials will assign new incorporated cities an interim population allocation based on the Office of Financial Management population forecasts and previous allocations to the former unincorporated area. ' Note to reader. The f011owing polides are numbered according to the policy number In the CWPPs, resulting fn non-sequential numberfng In thls document. � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 1 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 2. The new city will conduct a land capacity analysis using the Land Quantity Methodology adopted by the Steering Committee. a. The c'rty will first determine land capacity inside its limits and then will examine the capacity of unincorporated UGAs adjoining the jurisdiction's boundary. 3. The new c'rty will develop the Urban Growth Area proposal as part of its comprehensive planning process. a. The proposed UGA shall be presented to the Steering Committee at a public meeting. The new city must justify its UGA proposal, showing how the interim population allocation will be accommodated. b. The city must show how the area will be providing a full range of urban services within the 20-year time frame of the comprehensive plan. c. All Urban Growth Areas lying adjacent to the new city should be analyzed and either proposed as the jurisdiction's UGA, a Joint Planning Area (JPA), or proposed to be removed from the UGA and converted to rural land. d. The city will show its work by presenting its land capacity analysis, urban service anaiysis and other information as appropriate. 4. The Steering Committee will conduct a public hearing on the population allocation and the Urban Growth Area and/or the (or Joint Planning Area) proposal. The Steering Committee will vote on the proposal and will forward a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners via minutes from the public hearing. 5. The Board of County Commissioners may conduct a public hearing on the proposed Urban Growth Area, and/or the proposed Joint Planning Area, and population allocation. After the hearing, the 6oard will approve and adopt, modify or return the proposal to the city for revision and/or adoption. a. The new city shall include the approved or modified UGA and/or the JPA in its comprehensive plan. b. The new UGA or JPA will become an amendment to the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan by incorporation. Policies 1. Urban Growth should be located first in areas already characterized by urban growth that have existing public facitity and senrice capacities to serve such development, and second in areas already characterized by urban growth that will be served by a combination of both existing public facilities and services and any additional needed public facilities and services that are provided by either public or private sources. Further, it is appropriate that urban govemment services be provided by cities, and urban government services should not be provided in rural areas. Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) include all lands within existing cities, including cities in rural areas. 2. The determination and proposal of an Urban Growth Area (UGA) outside existing incorporated limits shall be based on a jurisdiction's ability to provide urban govemmental services at the minimum level of service specfied by the Steering Committee. Jurisdictions may establish higher level of service standards in their respective comprehensive plans. 5. Each jurisdiction shall submit proposed interim and final Urban Growth Area (UGA) boundaries to the Steering Committee, including: a. Justification in the form of its land capacity analysis and the ability to provide urban govemmental services and public facilities; b. The amount of population growth which could be accommodated and the analytical basis by which this growth figure was derived; and � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities ' Page 2 of 58 City of Spokane Valiey Comprehensive Plan c. How much unincorporated land is required to accommodate growth, including maps indicating the additional areas? 8. Each municipality must document its ability to provide urban govemmental services within its existing city limits prior to the designation of an Urban Growth Area (UGA) designation outside of existing city limits. To propose an Urban Growth Area (UGA) designation outside of their existing city limits, municipalities must provide a full range of urban govemmental services based on each municipality's capital facifities element of their Comprehensive Plan. 11. Each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan shall, at a minimum, demonstrate the ability to provide necessary domestic water, sanitary sewer end transportation improvements concurrent with development. Small municipalities (those with a population of 1,000 or less) may utilize approved interim ground disposal methods inside of Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) until such time as full sanitary sewer services can be made available. Each jurisdiction should consider long-term service and maintenance requirements when delineating Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) and making future land use decisions. 12. Within Urban Growth Areas (UGAs), new developments should be responsible for infrastructure improvements attributable to those developments. 18. Extension of urban govemmental services outside of Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) should only be provided to maintain existing levels of service in existing urban like areas or for health and safety reasons, provided that such extensions are not an inducement to growth. Policy Topic 2— Joint Planning within Urban Growth Areas Policies 1. The joint planning process should: a. Include all jurisdictions adjacent to the Urban Growth Area and Special Purpose Districts that will be affected by the eventual transference of govemmental services. b. Recognize that Urban Growth Areas are potential annexation areas for cities. c. Ensure a smooth transition of services amongst existing municipalities and emerging communities. d. Ensure the ability to expand urUan governmental services and avoid land use barriers to expansion; and e. Resolve issues regarding how zoning, subdivision and other land use approvals in designated joint planning areas will be coordinated. 2. Joint planning may be accomplished pursuant to an interfocal agreement entered into between and/or among jurisdictions and/or special purpose districts. Policy Toplc 3— Promotion of Contiguous and Orderly Development and Provision of Urban Services Policies 1. Each jurisdiction shall include policies in its comprehensive plan to address how urban development will be managed to promote efficiency in the use of land and the provision of urban govemmental services and public facilities. The Steering Committee shall specify regional minimum level of service standards (see Table 4.1) for urban governmental senrices with the exception of police protection within Urban Growth Areas (UGAs). Local jurisdictions may choose higher standards. In its comprehensive plan, each jurisdiction shall include, but not be limited to, level of service standards for: ( Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 3 of 58 C�ty of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan a. fire protection; b. police protection; c. parks and libraries d. libraries; e. pubiic sewer, f. public water; g. solid waste disposal and recycling; h. transportation; i. schools. Tabte 4.1 Reg{onal Leval ot Servico Standards FACILITY LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD (LOS) Domestic Water Supply - Minimum Levels oi Servloe for storage capaclty and flow shall be consistent with the Washington State Department of Health requlrements and the Spokane County Coordlnated Wate� S�rstem Plan requiremeeRts (where applicable). Systam Deslgn — Mlnlmum Levels af Servioe for pipe atzing, flow rate, and systematic grid Domestic Water devetopment shall be consisterit with the Washington State Department of Health requirements and the Coordlnated Water System Plan requ(rements (where appllcable). Fire Flow — Flre 8ow rate and duratlon as w�ell as fire hydrarrt spedflcadons and spadng shafl be consistent with local fire authorfty requlrements or the Flre Code, whlch ever Is more aUir�gent. Incorporated ereas wlll be provided wtth wastewater callection and transport systems In acxardance with the edapted sewer c�ncurrency requlrements of the Jurisdldfon. Unlncotpo�ated urban growth areas will tie provlded wlth wastewater colledion and transport systems in accordance with the requfrements for sevu�er concurrency as set forth tn Spokane County's Development Regulations. Cotlectlon systems and transport systems wIN be deslgned to� peak flow condt�o�s so thet ove�tows, bacicups, and discherges from the system do not occur under normal operating situa�ans. Spedfic destgn c�ite�fa shall conform to tt�e requlrements of the Washington State Qepartmerrt of Ecology and local regulations. Wastewater colleciion and transport systems wlll corney wastewater to ce�tralized wastewater treatment facilitles CeMralized wastewater treatment and eflluertt disposal fadllties wlll be planned, designed, and Sanftary Sewer consUucted to provlde effiuent that does not adversely Impad the quality of suriace or ground water of the State of Washington. Pianning end design for wastewater treatrnertt and eftluent disposal faclllties vufll be based on 20 year proJections of populatfon growth and cuRent water quality criteria as established by the Washington State Department of Ecology. (Cer�fralized wastewater tr�atment faUlitles shal! be s pan of e sewage system owned a operst�d by a clty, bwn, munlclpa! corporallon, county, polltica! subdivlslon of the stai�e or other apprnv�ed ownershlp conslstlnq of a cdlectlon system and necessery trunks, pumpinq fecifiiies end means of frnal treatment and disposa/ and approved or unde� permlt from rh� Washin�ton StaM Department of Eoology.) Transpo�tation Maintaln travel coMdor Ume as estabfished by Spokane Reglonal Transporta�o� Councll. Flooding of prope�ty outside designated drainage-ways, de-facto drainage-ways, easementa, flood zones or other approved drainage fadlit�es, during the deslgn preclpitation or runof( event pnescxibed In the standards of the goveming Iocal agency or JurisdicUon, shall be prevented within the reasonable p�obabNity affonded by such standerds. Impad to buIldings end eccessory Stortnwater S�ures shall be avotded to the maxlmum exterrt precticable by evsluetlng the effects of a 100- year raln everit, and Implemendng measures to ensure that the runaff ettendant to such event is directed away from sudi b�ldings and accessory structures. Arty stormwater dis��harge to surface or ground waters must meet tederal, stafe and local requirements for water quallty treatment, stom�v+rater runoff and 1rtflltratlon. Law Eriforoeme�t Each JurlsdlcGon shall spec�fy in its Comprehensfve Plan a level of police protec�ion that add�esaes the safey ot its dtizens. Ubrarles Eech )urtsdlctlon wlll apeGfy tts own level of service. Parks Each )urEsdtctlon will specffy its own {evel of service. � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-�7-2009� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 4 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.1 Re�lonal Level oi Service Standanis FACiUTY LEYEL OF SERVICE 8TANDARD (L03) Solid waste processing will meet Federai and State regulations, inciuding maintaining ar�y required Solid Waste facilities Ilcenses. Eech Ju�isdiction wfthin the non-attainmeM area ahail develop and use a street cleaning p�an, coord(nating wfth Spokane County Alr Poliutlon Cartrol Autho�iry (SCAPCA) as the overs(gM agency, to meet mandated Partlwlate Matter dust standards. Eact� Juriadictfon's street Geanirrg pian wlll describe the programs and methods to be used to reduce particulate matter emissions from paved surfaces. Each plan ahall address but not be ilmlted to the to0ovuing: 1) Street Street Cleaning s�p�ng frequency and technology to be employed. 2) Factors for determining when and where to INtlate street sweeping following a sanding event, wRh the goals of expeditious removal when safety end mob(liiy requlrements have been satisfied. 3) Sanding reductlon goal. 4) Sanding materials spec�ticatlo�s to be employed. � Locations, applicatlon rates and circumstances for use ot chemicel de-(cers and other sanding attematl�es. 6) Idertttficatlon oi prlority roadways (over 15,000 average daly Vaffic count). Pubilc Transtt �urisdictions within the Public Transit Be�efit Area (PTBA} shall have policies canslstent with the level of servlce adopted by the Spokane 7ransit Authority Board o( Directors. Urban areas jurisdictions in exoess of 5,000 populatlon, or once e poputation oi 5,000 persoRS is achieved, shall be served by Flre DisUict wtth al least a (Washingt�on S�rvey srrd Ratirtg 8ursau of Insurance Servkes Office) Class 6 inaurance Ra6r►g or betier, For the purpc�ses of GMA minimum Leveis ot Service, Class 6 or better shaU be based on t1�e ISO Greding Schedule fo� municipal flre protedlon, 1974 editlon, as amended, by using the flre dlstrict, fire service c:ommunication, and flre safety control po�tions of the grading schedule, The total deflciency points Identified In these portions of the ISO w Washington Survey and Ratlng Bureau sche�ule shall not exceed 1,830 points. All Ju�isdictlons, regardless of size, ahail ensure that new development has a Fire Fiow and Fire and Emergency �� hydrant piacement per the Intemat�onal Flre Code adopted by that )urisdictlon. Urban areas must be wtthin 5 road mlles of an operating flre staUon that provides service wlth a"Class A" pumper, unless structures are equlpped wfth flre sprinkler(s) that are rated fn sccordance with the edltlon of the Intemationai Fire Code adopted by the jurisdiction, and is located within 5 road miles of an operating flre staGon that provides service with a Ciass 'A" rated pumper, Urban areas ahall be served by a state certified basic life support (BLS) egency. Urban areas shouid be served by an operating basic life saving unit within 5 mlles; and an operating advanoed life suRport unit within 6 miles or 10 minutes response tlme for those Jw�isdictlons with urban areas in excess of 5,0�0 in popuiation; and baslc lite support and advanced iffe support transpon service. Public Schools To be determiried by Individual school disVict CFP. 2. Each jurisdiction and other providers of public services should use compatible information technologies to monitor demand for urban govemmental and regional services and the efficiency of planning and services delivery. 3. Each jurisdiction shall include policies in its comprehensive plan to ensure that obstructions to regional transportation or utility corridors are not created. In addition, each jurisdiction should include policies in its comprehensive plan to ensure sustainable growth beyond the 20-year planning horizon. 7. Each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan shall include, at a minimum, the following policies to address adequate fire protection. a. Limit growth to areas served by a fire protection district or within the corporate limits of a city providing its own fire department. � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 5 of 58 Cit�r of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan b. Commercial and residential subdivisions and developments and resid�ntial planned unit developments shall include the provision for road access adequate for residents, fire department or district ingress/egress and water supply for fire protection. c. Development in forested areas must provide defensible space between structure and adjecent fuels and require that fire-rated roofing materials be used. 9. Wellhead protection p(ens should be coordinated with water purveyors and implemented by local jurisdictions. The Steering Committee shall pursue strategies for regional (to include Idaho jurisdictions) water resource management, which sustain projected growth rates and protect the environment. 10. Each jurisdiction shall include provisions in its comprehensive plan for the distribution of essential public facilities_ 13. Each jurisdiction shall plan for growth within Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) which uses land efficiency, adds certainty to capital facilities planning and allows timely and coordinated extension of urban governmental services, public facilities and utilities for new development. Each jurisdiction shall identify intermediate growth areas (sa to ten year increments) within its Urban Growth Area (UGA) or establish policies which direct growth consistent with land use and capital facility plans. Policy Topic 9— Fiscal Impacts Policies 1. Each jurisdiction shall identify, within the capital facilities element of its comprehensive plan, capital resources that will be available to accommodate the additional development which is anticipated within Urban Growth Areas (UGAs). 4.2 Essential Public Facilities The City of Spokane Valley is required to plan for essential public facilities (EPFs) pursuant to GMA. Spokane County adopted through the CWPPs "Growth Management Essential Public Facilities Technical Committee Report° in 1996, which set forth a model project review process for the siting of EPFs. All jurisdictions within the County are required to provide a mechanism in the Comprehensive Plan to utilize the model project review process either verbatim or as a model. More recently, the Washington State Legislature passed two laws addressing siting of EPFs. In June 2001 the state enacted ESSB 6151, and in March 2002 the state enacted ESSB 6594. These laws require counties and cities fully planning under GMA to include a process in their Comprehensive Plans to provide for the siting of Secure Community Transition Facilities (SCTFs). A"secu�e community transition facility" (SCTF) is the statutory name for a less restrictive altemative resldential facility program operated or contracted by the Department of Social and Health Senrices. As stated in RCW 71.09.020, "... a secure community transition facility has supervision and security. end either provides or ensures the provision of sex offender treatment services." The prc�gram offers 24-hour intensive staffing and line-of-sight supervision by trained escorts when residents leave the facility. A less restrictive attemative (LRA) placement is defined in the state law as a living arrangement that is less restriciive than total confinement. In response to these new state laws, planning staff from all jurisdictions in Spokane County formed a task force to cooperatively develop a regional siting process for all essential public facilities, including SCTFs. The Essential Public Facilities Task Force, with assistance from the Washington State Office of Community Development (OCD), the Departmer�t of Social and Health Services (DSHS), and technical staff from the jurisdictions developed a regional siting process for essential public facilities titled Spokane County Reg�onal Siting Process for Essentlal Publr'c Facilities. Table 4.2 below lists EPFs that are either wholiy or partically of located within the City. The regional process provides for e review process with a location analysis. Public involvement takes place throughout the process with public comment periods as well as public hearings. The � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated �,-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 6 of 58 Ciry of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan review process requires the applicant for an EPF to assume responsibility for the bulk of the analysis and processing of the proposal. The analysis includes two parts. First, an analysis of functional criteria of all potential sites is conducted to select the highest-ranking ten (10) semi- finalist sites. Second, these ten semi-finalist sites are analyzed using more qualitative criteria and resulting in selection of at least three (3) preferred sites. Both analyses include public comment periods. Next, the Board of County Commissioners (BoCC) conducts a public hearing on the Preferred Site List to allow for further public comment, identify strategies to address any issues associated with particular sites, and rank the finalist sites. The BoCC ranking is advisory to but not binding on the applicant. Last, the applicant, after selecting a specific site, will work directly with a local jurisdiction and its regulatory requirements to permit construction and operation of the EPF. The regional siting process is based on a coordinated inter-jurisdictional approach, which in combination with consistent development regulations among the jurisdictions will implement the requirement of equitable distribution of EPF of a statewide or regional/countywide nature. Table 4.2 Irrvst�tory ot Essentlal Rublk Fac11it1es 3tgntftcanoe Category Name Addresa Statewide Regiora! Transportation Facili:ies Interstate 90 N/A Statev�ide Regio�al Transportatlon Facilltles � Centennlal Trafl WA Regional Regional Transportation Fadlities I Pence-Cole Valley Park 8 Rlde 414 S. University Rd , and TransiUTransFer Center Reglonal Regfonal Transportatlon FacJllties � Plnes Road/l 90 Park 8 Rlde E. Montgomery, Pines Rd i 8190 Reglonal Reglonal Transpo�tation FadUties S7A Maintenance — Bowdish � 23 S. Bowdlsh (Fleck Service Center) Regional Regional Transportation Facilities SR-27 (Pfnes Road) N/A Reglonal Regional Transporta�on Facilitles SR-290 (Trer�t Avenue) NIA Regional So(id Waste, Wastewater 8 Water Fadlities Valley Recycling-Transfe� 3941 N. Sullivan Rd -- Reglonal Social Servlce Fadlities Valley Hospital & Medical �2606 E. Mlsslon Av8 Center Regional Social Senrice Facilities Ame�iCBn B@h8Vl0rdl H@elth 12��5 E. Mission Ave Systems 4,3 Goals and Policies The following goals and policies are consistent with the goals and policies of the GMA and the Countywide Planning Policies. The City of Spokane Valley will implement the goals and policies for services provided by the City. Special purpose districts, such as water, school, and fire, are encouraged to implement the goals and policies that are under their control. Spokane Valley intends to coordinate with special purpose districts when they adopt and amend their own system plans end capital improvement programs. General Goal CFG-1 Provlde facllities and servlces that the City can most effectively deliver, and contract or franchise for those facllitles and services that the City determines can best be provided by a specfal dist�ict, other jurisdiction, or the private sector. Policies CFP-1.1 Review plans of service providers within Spokane Valley to determine consistency with the SVCP. � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 7 of 58 City of Spokane Vall�y ComFrehensive Plan CFP-1.2 The City should seek a baiance between the quality and cost of providing public facilities and services. CFP-1.3 Optimize the use of existing public facilities and promote orderly compact urban growth. CFP-1.4 Coordinate the construction of public infrastructure with private development to minimize costs whenever practicable and feasible. Capital Facllities Planning and Level of Service Goal CFG-2 Adopt and imptement a Capital Facilities Plan to ensure public fac111ties and services meet Level of Service Standards. Policies CFP-2.1 Facilities and services shall meet tfie following minimum Leve1 of Service standards: Table 4.3 Spokane Valiey Leve1 of Service Standards Facllity or Servtce Level of Service Standard Domestic Water Meet tt�e minimum Regional LOS' Sew�er Publlc sewef required for new development LOS D for Signallzed Intersectlona Transportatian LOS E for Un-signallzed Irttersedions Stommater Meet the minlmum Regfonal LOS' Law Errforcement No minlmum LOS adopted Parka 1.92 acres per 1000 resider�ts Libraries Ubrary Dlstrlct ta set LOS SoHd Waste Meet the minlmum Reglo�al L�S' Street Cleaning Meet the minimum Reglonal LOS' Public Transit Meet the minimum Reglonal LOS' Flre and EMS Meet the rninlmum Reglonat LOS' Public Schools Schaol Districts to set LOS • 8es Page 4 to� Reglonal L03 atandards CFP-2.2 Update the City's Capital Facilities Plan annually to ensure that services and facilities are provided efficiently and effectively and to help establish budget priorities. CFP-2.3 Planned expenditures for capital improvements �hall not exceed estimated revenues. CFP-2.4 If adopted level of servi�;a standards ca^�not be ma�nta,naa, t�a Ciry shal► increase fund�ng, r�du`c lev��! o` serv;ce sF�nd�rds o� reass�ss th� Land Us� El�r^en± � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated �1-07-200� Cnaptzr 4- Capital Facili`�es Page 8 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Public Safety - Fire and Police Goal CFG-3 Provlde police protectlon efficiently and cost effectively to Spokane Valley residents. Coordinate with flre dtstricts to ensure adequate flre protection and emergency services for Spokane Valley citizens. Policies CFP-3.1 Encourage inter jurisdictional cooperation among law enforcement agencies and fire districts to further develop, where practical, shared service and facility use. CFP-3.2 Develop a comprehensive emergency management plan that meets the needs of the City and coordinates with regional emergency planning efforts. CFP-3.3 Require adequate emergency vehicle road access and water supply/pressure for new development within the City. CFP-3.4 Encourage property owners to create a defensible space between structures and adjacent fuels and require that fire rated roofing materials are used on buildings in forested areas. Water and Sewer Goal CFG-4 Plans for water and sewer servlce should be consfstent with the SVCP. Policies I i CFP-4.1 Review water and sewer plans to determine consistency with anticipated population growth, future land uses, comprehensive plan land use policies and development regulations. � CFP-4.2 Coordinate sewer planning with appropriate jurisdictions for consistency with the , SVCP. CFP-4.3 Support continued planning for domestic water needs in partnership with water purveyors, the Joint Aquifer Board, Washington State Department of Health and the Washington State Department of Ecology. CFP-4.4 Encourage public and private efforts to conserve water. CFP-4.5 Discourage new, private domestic wells within the Spokane Valley City limits. CFP�.6 New development must connect to public sewer and water. Solid Waste Goal CFG-5 Promote the reduction, re-use and recycling of solid waste. Policies CFP-5.1 Establish a City Hall recycling program to present a positive example of civic and environmental responsibility. CFP-5.2 Participate in updates to the Spokane County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management plan and support its implementation. Stormwater Goal CFG-6 Ensure the provision of stormwater facilities and related management programs that protect surface and groundwater quality, prevent chronlc flooding from stormwater, maintain natural stream hydrology and protect aquatic resources. � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200,9, Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 9 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Policies CFP-6.1 Require stormwater management systems for new development. CFP-fi.2 Create and implement a stormwater management plan to reduce impac#s from urban runoff. CFP-6.3 Best management practices should be utilized to treat stormwater runoff prior to absorption of runoff into the ground. CFP-6.4 New development should include the multiple uses of facilities, such as the integration of stormwater facilities with recreation and/or open space areas, when possible. CFP-6.5 Encourage the use of altematives to impervious surfaces. Library Service Goal CFG•7 Promote efficient and cost effective library service to Spokane Valley residents. Policies CFP-7.1 Encourage continued free, reciprocal library services among all libraries within the Spokane region. CFP-7.2 Land use regulations should allow siting of library facilities in locations convenient to residential areas. CFP-7.3 Work collaboratively with the Spokane County Library District to develop long- range library plans consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Schools Goal CFG-8 School sites and facilitles should meet the education needs of Spokane Valley citizens. Policies CFP-8.1 Develop land use designations that allow new schools where they will best serve the community. CFP-8.2 Consider the adequacy of school facilities when reviewing new residential development. CFP-8.3 Assist school districts in their planning processes. Concurrency Goal CFG-9 New development shall be served with adequate facilities and services at the time of development, or within the time frame consistent with state law. Policies CFP-9.1 Implement a concurrency management system for transporfation, water and sewer facilities. Financing Growth Goal CFG-10 Consider a variety of revenue sources and funding mechanisms including, but not limited to, impact fees. Policies CFP-10.1 Identify and pursue sources of revenue for financing public facilities. � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 10 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Essential Publ�c Facilities Goal CFG-11 Collaborate wfth all Spokane County Jurlsdictions in determining the best locations for public and private essential public facilities. Policies CFP-11.1 Follow the process for siting essential public facilities as set forth in the Spokane County Regional Siting Process for Essential Public Facilities. Potential Annexation Areas Goal CFG-12 Provlde capltal facllitles to serve and direct future �rowth within the Citv Qf Saokane Vallev Potential Annexation Areas Policies CFP-12.1 Plan ar�d coordinate the location of public facilities and utilities in the potential annexation areas CFP-12.2 Considerinq, in advance, property acauisition opaortunities for future facilities includina but not limited to qarks, aolice facilities, stormwater facilities. greenbelts, open space, and street connections CFP-12.3 Coordinate with adjacent jurisdictions in developing capital imarovement erograms and studies addressing multi-jurisdictional issues 4.4 Capital Facilitles Plan 4.4.1 Introduction The Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) provides an analysis of the facilities and senrices required to support the future land use and growth projected in the Comprehensive Plan. The CFP includes a six year capital projects and a financing plan for facilities provided by the City. The finance plan identifies specific revenue sources that the City reasonably anticipates will be available in the year the project is scheduled to be constructed. The CFP includes Level of Service (LOS) standards for each public facility or service and requires that new development be served by adequate facilities. The purpose of the CFP is to use sound fiscal policies to provide adequate public facilities consistent with the land use element and concurrent with, or prior to, the impacts of development. 4.4.2 Growth Assumption On November 30, 2004, the Spokane County Board of Commissioners approved Spokane Valley's requested population allocation of 20,666 people. The allocation is the amount of people the City can accommodate within its current boundary. Spokane Valley considers this an 'interim° allocation until wastewater treatment capacity issues are resolved. Because Spokane Valley did not request an allocation outside of its City limits, facilities required to serve Urban Growth Areas adjacent to the City are not analyzed in this plan. These areas are under the jurisdiction of Spokane County; therefore, capital facilities planning activities within UGAs will continue to be the County's responsibility. The following population data is used for capital facilities planning purposes: Table 4.4 Population Projectton I Yoar �^-,�� ao8 2012 2az6 I Populatlon 85 �88 92 92,243 105,676 4.4.3 Level of Service � Adopted April 25, 200fi (Updated 01-07-2009J Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 11 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Cities are often defined by the quality of facilities and services that are provided to its residents. Goad road, sewer and water infrastructure are typical criteria used by businesses considering relocation. Park and recreation facilities are increasingly used to judge the quality of a City. Businesses want to locate where they can attract the best employees, and quality of life issues are often the deciding factor for a person to move to a new area. l.evel of senrice standards are quantifiable measures, such as acres of parks per 1000 people, or the amount of time ft takes to travel a road segment during peak moming and aftemoon "rush hours,' the higher the level of service the higher the cost. This element establishes (evels of service which will be used to evaluate the adequacy and future cost of urban facilities and services. 4.4.4 Concurrency The Growth Management Act introduces the concept of concurrency, which requires new development to be served with adequate urban services at the time of development, or within a specified time thereafter. The GMA aliows six years for necessary transportation improvements to be constructed as long as a financial commitment is made at the time of development. The GMA strongly encourages concurrency for water and sewer, and it is good public policy to require the sarne. 4.4.6 Flnancing Facilities and 3ervlces The City is limited in its ability to financ� al� de�irea cap�taf f�:ciii, proj� Opt�ons m.,st ae available for addressing funding shortfalls or decisions must be made to lower levels of service for public fecilities. In deciding how to address a particular shortfall, the City will need to balance current needs versus future growth requirements; existing deficiencies versus future expansions Capital facilities plans r�,.._. .�� '_ ��... ��^��,�: f..��' _ ��,-� ��:! �-:u. �r�- � c�-��+��r� should be considered: a. Increase revenu�� b. decrease level of se � �Y i : � = : ; _ : �-, .: _:. :_ � � c. decrease the cost of the service or faci�,�y, d. decrease the demand for the service or fac�l�,y, e. or some combination of the above The following table presents possible financial resources available to the City for capital projects Teble �.6 Funding Resourcvs Funding Category Fundlnfl Sou�ce General Fund (Sales Tax, fees, property iax, utility tax, etc.) Current Revenues Real Estate Exdse Tax (REE� Impad Fees Non-voted Genet�al ObtigaUon Voted General Obligatfon Bonda Revenue (payable from a particula� utillty o� enterp�ise) Local Improvemerrt DisMct (Asseasment Bonds) Surfaoe Transportatlon Program Bridge Replao�ment Funds Federal Grants Canges�on Mitigetion and Air �ualtty Improvement Program (CMAQ) Land and Wate� Conservatlan Fund Commun'ity Developmerri Block GraMs � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 12 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.5 Funding Resouresa Funding Cat�ory Funding Source Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account (ALEA) Transportatfon Improvement Account Centennlal Clean Water Fund Public Wortcs Tn�st Funds Stete GrantslLoans Irtteragency for Committee for Outdoor Recxeation (IAC) Arteria! SUeet Fund (Motor Fuel Ta�c) Urban Arterial Trust AGCOUnt (UATA) AquaUc Lands Enhancement Account Hazardous B�idge Replacement Devetoper ConbibuUons Other ponattons Local Improvement Districis 4.4.6 Impact Fees New growth creates a demand for new and expanded public facilities and services. The GMA authorizes local governments to impose and collect impact fees to parfially fund public facilities to accommodate new growth. Impact fees can be used to pay for new or expanded facilities and cannot be collected to address existing infrastructure deficiencies. The GMA altows impact fees to be assessed on the following: • Public Streets and Roads • Public Parks • Schools • Open Space • Fire Protection Facilities • Recreation Facilities The City has not enacted impact fees as a funding mechanism for capital facilities, but may study the issue as directed by future City policy. 4.4.7 Community Facllities This section of the CFP includes civic buildings such as govemment o�ces� community centers, and entertainment facilities. As a new City, Spokane Valley does not have a signficant inventory of community facilities. Inventory of Exlsting Facllitfes Spokane Valley completed construction of CenterPlace at Mirabeau Point Park, in the summer, 2005. The facility houses the Spokane Valley Senior Center, conference facilities, classrooms and a"great room" for events. CenterPlace has a dining capacity of 400 and includes a full commercial kitchen. Spokane Valley leases office and meeting space for employees and City Council in the Redwood Plaza office building, located at 11707 East Sprague Avenue. Spokane Valley also leases precinct and court space at the Valley Precinct Building located 12710 East Sprague. Level of Service Spokane Valley does not propose to adopt a level of service standard for community facilities. Forecast of Fut N ee d s ( Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 13 of 58 Ciry of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Pian The need for new community facilities is difficuh to quantify and depends on the future structure of City government. ff Spokane Valley continues to contract for senrices such as police, parks and road maintenance, the need to acquire and maintain facilities will be minimal. However, if Spokane Valley begins providing these services, there will be a corresponding need for administrative office space and other facilities. For example, if Spokane Valley assumes responsibility for parics maintenance, a new maintenance facitity would have to be constructed to house equipment and employees. At some future point, Spokane Valley will likely purchase an existing building or construct a new building to house City Hall. This decision must be made with thought and vision. In the right location, City Hall will be the center for civic affairs and community events and will influence economic development and the creation of a City Center. The location should be centralized and accessible to all citizens. Nearly three-quarters of the Citizen Survey responden#s support using public money to help create a City Center. Locating a civic building, such as City Hall, in the Ciry Center would be a significant catalyst to creating a distinct center and identity for Spokane Valley. Locations and Capacities of Future Facflities Spokane Valley currently has no spec�c plans to construct new community facilities. The City must decide the location of a pennanent City Hall and/or other civic buildings. Future updates to the Capital Facilities element wilt include information on locations and capac�ties for community facilities Capital Projects and Financing P1an Spokane Valley anticipates either constructing a new C�ty Hall build�ng, or purchasing and remodeling an existing building within the six year time frame of this CFP. The following table shows that Spokane Valley will use approximately $1,000,000 of Real Estate Excise Tax revenue for Civic Buildings. Table �.6 Canmuniry Facllitiea Financing Ptan ProJect 2006 2007 T�8 2009 T010 2011 2012 Total Civic Fadllties 563 i 550 I 750 1,300 ` 3,163 I Total ' 0 0 0 563 550 750 ' 1,300 3,163 Revanue Source Real Estate Exclse Tax 250 250 400 100 1,000 i Generdl Ftmd --- 313 I 300 350 I 1.200 i 2.183 � Total 0 � 0 0 563 550 I 750 � 1,300 i 3,163 � � 4.4.6 Domestic Water The City of Spokane Valley does not own or operate a public water supply system. Rather, water is provided to Spokane Valley residences and businesses by special purpose districts, associations, and public and private corporations. Water service is coordinated by Spokane County through the Coordinated Water System Plan (CWSP), which identifies servi� boundaries, establishes minimum design standards and promotes the consolidation of regional water resource management. The CWSP is updated as needed at the direction of the Board of County Commissioners or the Washington State Department of Health (DOH). � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 14 of 58 Ciry of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan The City of Spokane Valley is supportive of existing regional water supply planning, water use efficiency programs and plans, watershed planning, wellhead protection plans, water quality plans, and planning for reclamation and reuse. �� . Water Systems � � ' � Water systems are categorized generally by the number of connections served; Group A systems provide service to 15 or _ more connections while Group B systems •1 �� ''T�'� � serve 2 to 14 connections. Spokane - , � Valley has 25 Group A systems and 13 �_ � Group B systems providing water service - _ within the City. A detailed inventory of �. water systems is shown below in the �"��" . inventory section. Water System Plans The Washington State Department of Health recommends that all water purveyors prepare a water system plan to determine future needs for water faciiities within their service areas. The plans must include an existing facility inventory, project future needs for water supply, conservation strategies, and identify and provide for the protection of aquifers against contaminates. Once a water system plan is adopted, it must be updated every six years. The Department of Health is the approval authority for water system plans. Water purveyors meeting the following criteria are required to have water system plans approved by DOH. 1. Systems having 1000 or more connections. 2. Systems required to develop water system plans under the Public Water System Coordination Act of 1977 (Chapter 70.116 RC111�. 3. Any system experiencing problems related to planning, operation and/or management as determined by the Department of Health. 4. All new systems. 5. Any expanding system. 6. Any system proposing to use the document submittal exception process in WAC 246-290- 125 (documents such as project reports and constructions drawings). In 2003, the Washington State Legislation passed what is commonly referred to as the "Municipal Water Law' (MWL), amending sections of the State Board of Health Code (RCW 43.20); the laws governing Public Water Systems (RCW70.119A); and sections of the state's Water Code (RCW 90.03). The MWL requires that water system planning documents must be consistent with Spokane Valley's Comprehensive Plan and development regulations. The Department of Health is developing procedures that water systems must follow to ensure coordination with local jurisdictions and consistency with growth planning. Water Rights Washington State water law requires all prospective water uses to obtain a water right permit from the Department of Ecology (DOE) before constructing a well or withdrawing any groundwater from a well. However, the law does allow a water right permit exemption, referred to as the domestic exemption, which states that no water right permit is required for the withdrawal of up to 5,000 gallons of water per day from a well when the water is being used for the following: 1. Livestock watering. 2. Single or group domestic water supply. 3. Industrial purposes. � Adopted April 25, 2005 (Updated 01-07-2009} Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 15 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 4, Irrigation of no more than one haif acre of lawn or noncommercial garden (RCW 90.44.050). For many years, Ecology issued water right certificates to water suppliers based on projected future use, rather than acrua! "beneficial use." The unused portions of those certficates or rights are known as "inchoate" rights, which could potentially be taken away by Ecology if not put to beneficial use. This situation was troubling to municipal water suppliers. Public water systems need a level of certainty to obtain financing for capitat facilities as well as to issue letters of water availability to development interests. The "Municipal Water Law: of 2003" clarified that cities are entitled to inchoate (unused) water for the purpose of serving expanding areas. This ensures that municipalities have sufficient water for anticipated growth based on the communities' comprehensive plans and water and supply plans. Watershed Planning In 1998, Washington State passed the Watershed Management Act to develop a"thorough and cooperative method of determining what the current water resource situation is in each Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) of the state and to provide local citizens with the maximur� possible input concerning their goals and objectives for water resource management anci development" (RCW 90.82.005). In late 1998, a Planning Unit was formed for WRIAs 55 and 57, or the Midd,e Spok:ane-Little Spakane Rive� watersheds, with Spokane County designated as the lea�: agency. The W di�r�rlCti I�id�IG��C��'it��. �7C.: �G�:1�l�J t��,' r�c1r'll�i:rl� Uil'! i.Q c::i'.i��c �!'Y�:�.� ��`i,�.iC:��l!�y� ��5��':C Ci�:� allows water quality, habitat and in-stream flows to be considered in the process. The watershe� planning effort is expected to produce information on how water is used in the Wa}er Resource Inventory Areas and recommendations for how it should be used in the future. The Planning Unit may also formulate a recomrnendation for in-stream flows for the Spokane and Littte Spokane Rivers. The Department of Ecology may establish minimum water flows or levels for streams, lakes or other public waters for the purpose of protecting fish, game, birds or other wildlife resources, or recreational or aesthetic values of said public waters whenever it appears to be in the public interest to do so. The data, information and recommendations generated by the Planning Unit may be used by the Department of Ecology to assess the ability to issue new water rights for the Spokane Valley- Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer. The WRIA 55 and 57 planning process will provide a basis for bettEr understanding of potential water resource limits and will be incorporated into future updates to this capital facilities plan. Inventory of Water Systems Most of the water used by Spokane Valley residents and businesses is provided by water and irrigation districts and small water systems, listed in Tables 4.7 and 4.8 and shown on the Water Districts and Wellheads map, located at the end of this chapter. The City of Spokane provides water to the westem portions of Spokane Valley, totaling approximately 620 connections. Group A water systems are those which have 15 or more service connections or regularly serve 25 or more people 60 or more days per year. Group B water systems serve two to 14 connections and are not subject to the federal Safe Drinking Water Act. Instead, they must meet state and local requirements for water quality and operations. � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated Q�-�7-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 16 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Tsble 4.7 Spokano VaIIQy Water Purv�yocs - Group A Systems Current Residerttlal Cument Non Residerttlal �o�ge C3roup A 8yst�ms Connectlons Connectiorts �� (9allons) Bayou On Barker 0 4 0 Burger Royal -- --- 4 - 1 50 _ i _ Camhope IrrigaUon District 7 455 ' 0 0 CenVal Pre Mtx - Sullivan Rd � 4 4 0 Ciry Of Spokane' � 69700' 0 Not reported - ' — --- - - Cansolidated IMg Olst 19 System 1 30fi3 51 2,750,000 Coresolidated Irri Dist 19 S tem 2 � 3663 � 141 2,240,000 9 Ys East Spokane Water D(st 1 1158 - 94 1,027,000 Hutchinson Imgation Dist �16 790 0 1,200,000 Honeyweil Elecironic Mfg LLC 0 1 0 Inrin Water Distrkk;t �S 757 ' 0 1,900,OQ0 Kaiser Alum - Trentwood Works 0 2 21,200 Model Irrigatlon Dist #18 2116 4 550,000 Modem Electric Watef Co 4302 0 1,500,000 Orchard Avenue IMgatJon Dist 6 1188 0 i 0 Pinecroft Mobils Home Park � 143 0 � 400 _� __ . _ _ _ �_ _ ___ _ Puerta Vsllarta 0 1 0 Spittire Pub And Eatery 0 2 87 Spokane Business 8 Industrial Park 0 237 478,000 Spokane Co - Mirabeau Park 0 2 200 Spokarie Co Water Dist #3 I 9788 426 6,880,000 Trentwood Irrigation Dlstrict 3 1470 0 1,120,000 Vera Wate� 8 Power 6652 0 I 8,650,000 Woodland Patic Trailer Court 30 0 0 • Approximately 820 conrtedbns within City of Spokane Valley Source: Washington ShaUe DeRartrnent of Health Table 4.8 Group 8 Systems Group 8 System Conneciions Hollday Trailer Court �� 12 Janzen 8 Janzen i 1 Levemier Cons� Wate� System 1 Meroer Trucking Co Inc 1 Middco Too18� Equfpment 1 Systems Trensport Inc 1 Td Water System 6 Tds - ---- -- - 2 � Adopted Aprii 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 17 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Union Pacific Railroad - Trentwood ' 1 Westco S i4pparel Setvice �-- 3 Westem Structures Inc 2 VNSDT-Pines Road Maintenance 1 3uurce: Wa�hington 8�a Departmont ot Hoalth Level of Service The Countywide Planning Policies were amended in 2004 to defer level of service standards for water supply and fire flow to the requirements of the Department of Health and local fire codes respectively. Forecast of Future Needs Spokane Valley adopts by reference water system plans for all water purveyors providing service within the City of Spokane Valley. Locations and Capacitles of Future Facilities Spokane Vafley adopts by reference water system plans for all water purveyors providing service within the City of Spokane Valley. Capitel Projects and Financing Plan Spokane Valley adopts by reference capital project and financing plans for all water purveyors providing service within the City of Spokane Valley. Fire Protectlon and Emergency Medical Service Fire protection and emergency medical services (EMS) are provided by Spokane Valley Fire Department (District No. 1) and Spokane County � . Fire District No. 8. Spokane Valley Fire serves over 90°!0 of the Valley, while District 8 serves a few small areas in the southem part of the City (see Fire ,� w_.. ., ` = Districts Map at the end of this chapter). Both �`�-�� - � .�- — districts serve the City with a full range of fire � ��` - suppression and EMS services. Spokane Valley ��'' �- voters chose to annex to Spokane Valley Fire and _____ =- _- .. - �. -�� District No. 8 in September, 2004. Insurance Rating City fire departments and fire protection districts are assigned a numerical fire protection rating by the Washington Surveying and Ratings Bureau. Insurance companies fund the Bureau to perform on-site inspections of fire districts to determine the rating. The Bureau analyzes five main areas: average response time, water supply, communication network, schedule of fire inspections and fire station evaluations (which focus on age of vehicles), personnel training and stafFng of facilities. Insurance companies use the fire protection rating to help determine insurance rates on all fire insurance policies. The rating is on a scale of one to ten, with one representing the best score. Quafity of fire service can have a significant impact on fire insurance rates, particularly for commercial businesses. As of April, 200fi, Spokane Valley Fire Department has a Fire Insurance Rating of four and District No. 8 has a Rating of five, both indicating good fire protection. Inventory of Existing Facilitles and Apparatus The Fire Districts Map shows the (ocation of fire stations and service area boundaries for Spokane Valley Fire, District No. 8 and surrounding fire protection districts. All fire agencies have mutual aid agreements to assist each other in major emergencies. � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 18 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Spokane Valley Fire 2006 apparatus inventory includes nine Class A engines, two Class A pumper/ladders, two medic vehicles, three brush trucks and other miscellaneous vehicles for staff, training, rescue, maintenance, prevention and command. Spokane Valley Fire has ten stations, including eight within the City of Spokane Valley. Locations of the stations are as folfows: Table 4.8 3pokane Valley Flre Distrtct Statton Locations Station 1' 10319 East Sprague Statlon 2' 8007 East Trent Stativn 3 2218 North Harvard Statlon 4 22406 East Wellesley StaUon 5' 15510 East Marietta Statlon 6' 6306 East Sp�ague StaUon 7' 1121 South Evergreen Station 8• NoRh 2110 Wflbur Stadon 9 East 11514 16 Stalion 10" � East 17217 Sprague ' Inside Spokane Velley Cit�r Limits " Medio-only statlon Fire District No. 8 has one fire station inside the City limits, station 84 in the Ponderosa neighborhood, located at 4410 South Bates. The District has finro stations located outside the City limits providing additional coverage, No. 81 at 6117 South Palouse Highway and No. 85 at 3324 South Linke Road. Stations 81 and 84 each have two Class A engines and two wildland brush engines. Station 85 has one Class A engine and one wildland brush engine. Level of Service Spokane Valley Fire's Level of Service goals for response time are as follows: • 5:00 minutes - 80°� of the time for fire calls • 5:00 minutes - 80°� of the time for Basic Life Support (BLS} • 8:00 minutes - 80% of the time for Advanced Life Support (ALS) Basic Life Support refers to a level of training that does not involve any advanced medical procedures or administration of drugs. BLS providers can provide basic life saving and life sustaining interventions while transporting a patient to a hospital. This is the foundation on which all medical care is built. Good basic life support is key to survival of critically sick and injured patients. Advanced Life Support refers to a certain level of care that may be provided to a patient by rescue squad members, if necessary. Members trained in Advanced Life Support techniques are often referred to as ALS providers. Among other procedures, ALS provide�s are able to administer certain life-saving medications, perform advanced monitoring of heart rhythms, and are trained to perform advanced procedures to open and manage a patient's airway. Average response times for fire calls the past 4 years are as follows: • 2003 - 5 minutes 22 seconds • 2002 - 5 minutes 27 seconds � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 19 of 58 City of Spokane Vailey Comprehensive Plan • 2001 - 5 minutes 28 seconds • 2000 - 5 minutes 35 seconds The District's historic response time data does not distinguish between types of calls Future data collection will divide calls between fire, ALS and BLS. Spokane Valley Fire has responded to an average 7,746 calls per year from 2000 to 2003. The following table shows the number of calls per year. Table 4.10 DisUict 1 Flre Respor�ses Year 2000 2001 2002 2003 Responsea 7594 7a06 7821 8165 The Countywide Planning Policies for Spokane County establishes minimum levels of service for fire and emergency medical services as follows_ Urban areas are required to be serviced by a Fire District with at least a Class Six Insurance rating. • Urban areas must be within five road miles of an operating fire station that provides servicc with a°Class A' pumper, unless structures are equipped with fire sprinkle�s. • Urban areas shall be served by a state certified basic life support (BLS) agency within f�v� -j �,. !-..,; ^�;^.r� �;.i :-7 I�r^ c�irnn-! c��,ii t'�:!}..�'1 ciY ('��cc n . �_�1 �'*�if'`�I�GC f�C!'}�,��- milr: �: � .. ". _. ...� ., . . -, - . . , _ _ . _.. - - _ 'i�� U�..�I f �rC U�Jii�... i C:ii.i t.` i��r'�' l�l� �� li;�m'��4 �..�.�li I��".._! �ir C��'t-�i 4:_. I'�:�..�' Forecast of Future Needs Spokane Valley Fire has identified two areas within the City of Spokane Valley that neec� improvement in response times and is planning to construct new stations to provide irnprovea service levels. The most urgent need is to provide better coverage to the south valley, and the District is planning to move Station No. 9 to the vicinity of 32 Ave. and Pines Rd. The northeast area of the City is underdeveloped at present but as the Cit�r grows over the next ten to fifteen years, the District recognizes that a new station will need to be constructed to provide an adequate level of service. The station will be constructed in the vicinity of Barker and Euctid. Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities Station No. 9 will be moved from its current location at 11514 East 16`" to the vicinity of 32�` and Pines. The station will include two bays and dorms for eight personnel. The District plans to reconstruct Station No. 10 into a three bay facility with donns for ten personnel. Station No. 11 wi11 be located in the vicinity of Barker and Euclid and will also be two bays with dorms for eight personnel. Construction for Station 11 is tentatively planned for 2014 or 2015. Capltal Projects and Financing Plan Spokane Valley Fire Department is a junior taxing authority that supplements its regular taxes with special levies. As the restrictions on the taxes generated from the regular tax go down, special levies are proposed to maintain needed funding. Special levies must be approved by Fire District voters. The Department does not use its bonding capacity to fund capital projects. The Department's philosophy is to reserve funds generated through its regular revenues for future capital needs. The following table represents the Valley Fire planned capital expenditures. � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 20 of 58 �i�+ �� pak�r�e Va�ley �c�mpr�her�s�ve Pl�r� Tabl� 4.1 i Spc�kane Y��ey �It� �-y��r �apltaa Pr�Jects an� ��r�ancEng Plan �ro�� $ ��o� �aos �r,�9 �oiv ��i �a�� t�a Fire St�tian I�c�. '� R _ � ._ � ., _ �� iY4D -I - — - -: �1,�(l0 {new canstru�#a�nj F�r� S�atio� No. 1� � � � � � 1,SOC7 �+1,8�00 (recv��teucti�n� Tatal �1,�(}(� �� 8�(? $2,�0 F+�ate: Fteserv� funds tram regula� d�s�ric� t�� w�ll iur�� capital imprav+�rrn+�nts. �Am�un#� ar� 46�n�s ��,OC}�} 4.4.9 Llbr�ry Servi�c� Libr�ry ��rvice� �� rorrid�d by �he �po�cane Gourrty Librar� [�i�trict. Th� Dis�ri�t h�s � I�n� h3�tc�ry erf ��llent s�rvic� a�� por� i��c�rpo�atia�, the �i�t}� c�f �p��an+� V�I�ey ��ecuted ��ne�y�� c�ntract �►it� th� District for cvnti�ued s�rv�c�. After th�e init��l year, S�c��Car�� IJalle�r �nd t�e Lib��ry �is�ri�t �gf�ed tc� a fv�e ��a� c�ntr�+c� for �i�rary s�nric�s l�egin�ir�g in �0��. Ei�ht�-seve� perc�ent �f uot�r� approv�� ar�ne�ring b�c� int� th� [�i�tri�t in a M�y ��5 �pecia! �lecti�n, wit� tF�e �annex�tivn eff��k�v� J�r�u2�ry '! , �Q�6. Facil�� P�ar�ming� After incorp�r�ti�n, tf�� .��r�ry �3istric'� �nd t�re !�ity c�f Spvkar�e Va�lley cvil��nrat�d �n d�v�l��ir�� a r�ew c�pit�l f��il�tie� �I�n f�r th� l��tri�. Ir� M��h �C��14, the c�pit�l fa�ilit�e� plannir�g prr�ce�� k�e��n and a�ir�nifi��# a��n�a�an# �f infarm�t�� w�� g�t�er��, includin�: • �omp�r��r�n� with 1il�r�ry f��dliti�es �n ath�r �imil�r �i�ed 'U1��Min�tar� citi�� • 5pak�ne U'all�y der��rap��c� * Pub�ic 11'br�ry �acility star�c�ards •�n ana9y�s�s crf cutr��4 �pc�k�t�e 1�`alley �rea liararies � �r�� r��d �ans !�f v�rivu� f��ility� �1te�r��ti�r�� n�d • ��mm�rr�i#yr res��r�h Publi� P'�r�i+c��ation `i`h� LNbrary �ista��# a�d th� �irf�r vf Spokan� V�11ey cc�nduct�d a car�dvm �rnp�l� s�r�r�y c�f ��cakane �'alle�r r�sid�rrts 'rr� M�r�h ar�d April �of ��4. The s�rv�y ��th�r��J ir�f�rn7ati�� r� 1�cal libr�ry �s�e, �atis#activn w�th lib�ar�r services ar��d �r�f�ren�c�� r�g�rding fuiur�e library �ervi�es. l�he ais�rict sl�r� �a��ducted � c�mmuni4y �pen ho�se in �'[�y 2�04, at�er�c�ed by �� p�ap�e, 7�"�l� c�f wfiich w�re City re�idents. l�#�rm2�4i�r� �w�� a�tain�e� +�n satisfa��ic�r� �rith ��c�lities ar�ai servic+e, ��cility irnprc�v�ment capti�ans., p��ferred iib�ary lo��at�ons i� � nev�+ m�in li�rary w�r� t� rep�� t�e curr�nt Valle�r I�ib�ary, constru�t�r�� ei�h�r c�n�e ar t�+a ne�+ br�r�cl��s, and v+��1li�rr�n�e�s ta p�ry f�r new li�raries. �tese�r�h �c�nc�usiar�� Ariai�rsis �f i�f�rr��#ion c�ather� l�ads tv the cvr��lu��or� that �d�i�i�r�a� li�r�ry space is �eeded tc� serv� Spok�n� Va11ey re�i�e�ts. It is a��o �d�t�mnin+e� tha�t ex��ndin� th� cur��nt'��II�� Lf�r�ry i�n"t a v�a�l� a�temati��e. The comr�unity in�u# sl��+�d a very �'s�k� I�v�l ��8�:�0) of �verall �atR��ac�ian �+i�� li��ry s�rvi+�s �r�d � hig� I�v�� f ��tisf��n writh c�rrent ��cilit%�s. The ��b1i� ide��i�ied two �r�e�,� ne�ding �mprarrer��nt - m�ter�al� �vailability, which req�ire� a I�rger I�br��y, ��d pu�iCi� � �►dc�pt�d �pr�l �5, ��DO�� Updated fl�-�7y2(�0� �hapter 4 � ��p�t�[ F�c�litie� Pag� 29 of �B City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan access computer availability. Oniy a modest interest in funding new facilities was expressed, demonstrating a strong need for community education about future library facilities needs. Community Survey Spokane Valley's Community Preference Survey included a question to gauge Spokane Valley citizen's satisfaction with current Library services. ��. The majority of survey respondents viewed library �� senrices in a positive light, with 83% of �� ;�, � -� � - respondents repo�ting that library services were �= ��-��: ,- ---- : .� good, very good or excellent. �; ;.�;,._ : � �. Inventory of Existlng Fac111tles _ ��,_ _,'. _ � � ---r- Spokane Valley has one library located inside its boundary, the District's Valley Branch, located at 12004 East Main. This resource library is the DistricYs largest facility, measuring 22,100 square feet, including administrative space. The District has two other libraries within the greater Valley area located at 4322 North Argonne and 22324 East Wellesley in Otis Orchards. As of May 2004, 35,544 Spokane Valley residents were Libra District cardholders. Valle Library was the primary branch of registration, with Argonne VALLEY second and Otis Orchards third. Spokane County Library District has a reciprocal library card agreement with the City of Spokane with over 1,500 Spokane E Av Valley residents owning a Spokane public library card. v�r g� wA Level of Service = � � � The Spokane County Library District has not � � E 1�M Av established a level of service. �, Forecast of Future Needs The District uses a target Spokane Valley population of 105,000 for its future projections, which is consistent with the City of Spokane Valley's population allocation for growth within the existing City limits. The District recognizes that a new library needs to be built inside Spokane Valley to provide adequate library senrices. Future facilities will be divided between a main branch and a future neighborhood branch. Locations and Capacities of Future Facllitles The main branch should measure about 49,000 square feet to adequately serve a population of 84,000 people. The main branch should be located on an arterial street within about one-half mile of the Sprague corridor between Dartmouth and Sullivan Roads. A neighborhood branch of approximatety 15,000 square feet serving a population of 20,000 would ideally be located within two to three miles of the main branch. Capital Projects and Ffnancing Plan The future main branch is estimated to cost $11.4 million in 2004 dollars; the neighborhood branch would cost about $3.6 million. Voter-approved general obligation bonds are the normal financing method for library projects of this size. The District proposes the following capital improvement schedule: 1 to 6 years • Determine preferred locations for new libraries. • Develop funding plan. • Purchase land for libraries. � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated �-07-2009� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 22 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 5 to 10 years • Secure funding and purchase site(s) if not already done. • Construct new main branch. • Seil existing Valley branch. 10 to 20 years • Secure funding and construct neighborhood branch. Tabl� 4.1 Z SpokanQ County Llbrary Dbtrlct slx year Capltal ProJects and Flnancing Plan Project 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total New Spokane Valley �100 �150 31,700 �8,300 I $8,750 0 0 �19,000 Ubrary Totat �100 $150 �1,700 58,300 58,750 0 0 $19,000 Revenue 3ourcea GO 8onds $100 5150 S1,700 58,500 58,750 0 0 19400 Total 5100 i1S0 51�700 S8,S00 � s8,750 0 0 19000 Note: The majority oi General Fund expenses fncurred in 2006 end 2007 are relmbursabte irom vater-approved bond funds. The Library District will continue to work with the City of Spokane Valley to further develop plans to construct new libraries. As plans are updated and refined, this Capital Facilities Plan will be amended to incorporate future changes. Operational Costs The Library District assumes that with efficient building design and continuing staff productivity improvements, a larger Valley Library and an eventual new branch can be operated at normal District funding levels of 50 cents per $1,000 of assessed valuation. 4.4.10 Parks and Recreation Spokane Valley has a wide range of recreational opportunities available to residents �'.�- . ; '� � �� ' ` '-�� and visitors. City parks, school play fields, golf �; *. :� -r �� ,•'° `� s��► courses, trails, County parks and conservations ' - , ; ��' � - '�� ' areas are all within close vicinity to Spokane �ti.�. = � t Valley residents. ' �' � -'�� _ RS ' � ' I •�,�- ' ' � � " _ i � ♦ • ��f � The City provides a system of local parks that is � �; � ' 1 - managed by the Spokane Valley Parks and =!� ; �. : i; � �,., � Recreation Department. The Parks Department is in the process of developing a new Parks, - ___ ._ _- Recreation, and Open Spaces Master Plan. When finished, this plan will offer a detailed picture of the park, recreation and open space system, including changes and improvements �_ that will be made in the future. - This section of the Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) provides summaries of the parks inventory, level of service (LOS), future park needs, proposed projects, and a financing plan for the next six years. � Park Types � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 23 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Pian Parks are ciassified by their size, service area and function. Spokane Valley uses the nationally recognized Park, Recreation, Open Space and Grt4enway Guidelines, to establish standard for parks planning. Major classifications include mini-paric, neighborhood, school-park, community, large urban, various trail designations and special use facilities. The Parks Element, Chapter 9, provides a thorough description of park types used for pianning purposes. Inventory of Exlsting FaciliUes The Parks Map, found at the end of this Chapter, shows the location of all pa�ics within Spokane Valley. Table 4.13 provides an inventory of park and recreation facilities owned by Spokane Valley. These parks are used to calculate Spokane Valley's level of service for parks. The Parks Master Plan provides the most detailed inventory of parlcs, including equipment, structures and other miscellaneous park facilities. Tabte 4.13 Spokane Vatley Paric Facllfties Spokana Valley Parka Acreage Status Nelghborhood Parka Balfou� Park 2.88 Developed -- Browns Park � I 8.03 Developed CasUe Park 2.71 Minimally Developed Edgediif Pa�C 4.74 Developed Terrace vew Pa�lc i 9.24 -- Developed 3ubtotal I 27.68 � � Community Parks — - — i - -- - ---- - Vatley Mlssion Pa�fc 21.91 Develeped Subtotal 21.81 i Lar�e Urban Parks , - -- -- ! - Mirabeau Point Park f 41.91 i Developed 8ubtotal 41.91 ' Special Use Areaa - - � - - Pa�c Road Poal i 2.00 Developed Sullivan Park -- - - i 16.07 Developed Vallsy Senio� Center 2.09 Developed CeRtetPlace — - --- - - - ', 13.60 DevelOped 8ubtotal � 33.T6 � _ i_ � u�,de�eio�a Pa�c �a�a j Myrtle Point Psrk 31.07 Undeveloped Valtey Misslon Park (South) 7.22 � Undeveloped 8ubtotal 38.29 � Total Paric Acrea 183.45 � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200,9� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 24 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Level of Service The Countywide Planning Policies for Spokane County requires all jurisdictions to adopt a level of service (LOS) standard for parks. Spokane Valley has the flexibility and freedom to adopt a �,''' LOS standard for parks that reflects the ,�, y` "+ expressed need and desire of our community. � =-`-• �� -'; . � The National Recreation and Parks Association � � suggest that cities adopt LOS standards for ` different park types, such as mini (pocket), ' � - ; neighborhaod, community and major parks. ,, , , Spokane Valley does not have a well-developed -� `' "� "' park system and will use total City-owned park ''n' _ acres for its LOS measurement. Spokane Valley currently owns 163 acres of °"' '= ..� developed and undeveloped park land. Using the -`- � 2006 population of 85,010 people, the current ��. . parks LOS is 1.92 acres of City park land for �— every 1000 residents. Spokane Valley adopts 1.92 acres11000 people as its minimurn LOS standard for parks, as shown is Table Teble 4.14 Spokane Valley Parks Level ot Service 4.14 Spokane Valley recognizes that C(ty-Owned schools, churches, natural areas and 20oe Populatlon park Acrea ��el of Servlce commercial enterprises all provide recreation opportunities for Spokane Valley residents. These will all be es,o�o �s3 � .92 ac�s1�000 taken into consideration when � Spokane Valley determines the best location to purchase new park land. Forecast of Future Needs Spokane Valley has the capacity to accommodate 20,666 people over the next 20 years within the current City limits. In order to maintain the current LOS of 1.92 acresl1000 people, Spokane Valley would have to add about 40 acres of park land over the next 20 years, with 12 acres in the first six year�, as shown in Table 4.15. The Parks Master Plan provides a more detailed analysis of park and recreation needs by dividing the City into smaller service areas. Tab{o 1.15 Future Park D�mand Yea� Populatlon Tatal Paric Acres Acres Required at 1.82 Net Deflcfency Acres Avaitable acresJ1000 ! � � 2006 85,010 �� 163 163 0 � 2012 92,243 I 163 177 -14 2025 105,676 163 203 -40 •Aasumes 20-year growth of 20,666 people 1 Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities In order to maintain the adopted 1.92 acres11000 level of secvice standard, Spokane Valley must add 12 acres of park land by the year 2011. In order to address this deficiency, Spokane Valley will purchase 20 acres of park land w�thin the six year time frame of this Capital Facilities Plan, resulting � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 25 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Pian in surplus of eight acres as shown in Table 4.16. The Master Plan will be used to determine the best lacations for park land acquisitions. Table 4.1B Parks Capaciry Anaysts Yoar Populatlon Total Park AcrQS Acres Requi�d �t 1.8Z Nvt ResQnw Ac� Avaltable acrosJ1000 200ci 85,010 163 1 fi3 0 - - - 2012 - - - 92.243 183' � 177 - - - - 8 '20 acres of parkland will be purchasetf within first 6 y�ears oi plan Capital Projects and Financing Pian The following table details Spokane Valley's six year Parks and Recreation capital improvement financing plan. The table details projects that address level af service deficiencies (capacity projects) and other capital improvements (non-capacity} projects. Table 4.17 Parfca Capltal Facllftles Plan Note: Amounts In t1,000 Pro)ect 2006 2007 2008 �008 2010 2011 2012 Total Park Land AoqulsiGon (20 � �0p i $1,400 Acres Capadty) _ -. , ; — - ' Park Improvements 300 950 500 I 500 580 100 200 53,130 � Swlmming Pool Upgrades -- 1,600 I I �I St,800 I --- Total �,300 2,550 ! 500 � 500 580 100 200 ± S5,730 Re�enue Source General Fund �,300 300 51,600 � � I REET �1 450 I 400 400 I 400 100 � 200 31,950 , (3rants - - 200 100 100 I 180 5580 � I I - — --- - - - - - 1.600 . — I —� --- -- I 31,600 _ Spokane County � � Total ----- �.� 2,650 I 50Q ' 500 580 100 200 I 55,730 4.4.11 Publfc Safety The Spokane Valley Police Department is a contract law enforcement agency, partnering with the Spokane County Sheriff's Department to provide a safe environment for the citizens, businesses, and visitors of the City of Spokane Valley. This unique contracting relationship ellows for the sharing of many of our resources, allowing both agencies to operate at peak efficiency without duplicating services.