The URL can be used to link to this page

2009, 05-12 Regular Meeting r . ,-t�-�_ AGENDA �POKANE VAI.LEY CITY COLiNCIL REGULAR MEETIivG Councit Meering #159 Tuesday, Niay 12, 2009 6:00 p.m. Spokane Valley City FIall Council Chambers 11707 E Sprague Avenue Counci! Requerl.s Alease Silence Your Cel! Phones Durin,� Gounci! Meetin,� C:�L_L TO ORllER: INVOCATION P215IU(' iV�31111tI I�CTliliil<,!, Fc�unt<iin 1�iini�tri�s PI�ED(.E OF AI,LFGIANCF': ttt)LL (::�LL: 4PPR0�':�L OF :�GE�tD:�: INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND YRESENTATIONS: COMIVIITTEE, BOARD. LIAiSON Sti1��Y REPORTS: M.4�'OR'S REPORT: Proc•lum�ltio�rs: Br�ng Your Kids to i3'ork Dav: :lluy i1 Ulder Ameri�an.ti ' �tilvnlfl; rVcatioric�l .Suf e R�c�li�r�,l 6�'eek PUBL.IC COMMENTS: �rhis is an app��rtunity for the public to speak on any subject not on the agend�� for action. When }�ou come to the �cxiium, please state your name and address for the r�cord and Iirnit remarks to three minutes. 1. CONSEYT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine �vhich are appruved as a�rc�up. A Councilmember may remove an item fram ttle Consent Agenda to be considered sepai~ately. a. Approval of the following claim vouchers: �/23/2009 17133 - 17194 � �87,943.19 4/24I2049 17195 - 17215 $75,695_29 412$/2009 17216 $25U.00 �/01/2009 172�9 - 17285 �26,3�3.7� GRAND TOTAL ��9 Q,2f2.2 3 � b. Approval af Payroll for pay period ending Apri134, 20U9: $357,5�7.86 c. Approval of April 14, 2009 Regular Council Me�ting Minutes d. Appro��al of A�ril 28, 2009 Regular Council Meetin� Rti�l��tes YEW BUSI�YESS 2. Secand Reading 1'roposed (Urdinance U9-OU8 Amending Cumprehet�sivc ['lan —�like fi �1i1(lt� �r [public comment] 3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 09-009 Amending Zoning Map — Mike Basin��r [public comment] 4. Second Reading Propos�d �)rclinan�L (�9-� l �, Ratch (`��je Ar1�e 11C�illc'.flt� -- � '}iri;tina .)ar�s��n �public commentj 5. Pru��osed Resolution 09-UU� 13��Ici�� Autlic�ritti� — Ken I lic}iii��s��r� (publie eocnment� �. Motion Consid�ration: S�raQue Avenue ResurfacinQ Phase I Bid — Neil Kersten (public cumment� (.itllilCll Agenda05-12-i19 R��ul�r?�i�c:ting �''�- � �'t �' :�D.MINISTRITIVF RFP�RT 7. Draft �rdinance 1�Iodifying Spokartz Valley Municipal Cc��fe 9.1 U(to« - (an Whitnzy/Cary Driskell K. Splashdown Contract Discussion - Nlike Stc 9. Western Dance Hall Contract - Mike Ston� I0. Allocation of Space at Valley Precinct Buildinry - Morg.in Kc.�uc3�lka 1 1. Regional Transp�rtation Update - Mavor Munsoi� YLiIiLIC C0��1:1�IENTS [�his is an opporcunity for the public to speak on any� topic. V�%hen you cume t�7 the podium, please state your name and address f�r the record and limit remarks t�� three mi�lutes. I�'YFORN[ATTON OiVLY: 12. Winter Road Assessment - Neil K�rsten EXECLITIVE SESSION: r'�U.IOURNMFNT TUTURE SCf�EDL'LE (meetin� sc•heclt�l� is crl�t�crys s ubj�.�et tv �=hunge Regular Council hfeetings are generally /�eld lnd nnd 4`'� Tuesdays, begin�ri�rg ut G: 0�I �.nr. Council Study Sessions are generall�� l�eld 1�", 3 an�! Sth Tuesdat's, hc��inning at 6: OOn.m. hC7IICC: ln�livi�ivals p{annin� to ari�nd th� me:ctir�g «ho rcquire 5peciaJ �usist:uice; to acc.ommadate physical, hearing, i�r other impairrnenis, ple�se contact thc Cin• Clcrk at (509) 921-1Q00 as sovn as possiblc �o thut arrun�cments rnny be m�de. Council ��gcnda US• 12-09 Itegul�r Mcetin� f'c;c� ' of 2 i�- �� ~�� . __ - L�� p ok�ane Valle � � . � L'0 C��Yltt�tiD Il �I'ake our �Daughters and'Sons to �ork�� ay City of spokane �a��r, �asFiin�to�� j��HEREAS, Ttie �tils. FourZduti�n for l��'onzejz luunch`d "1 ake Uur l�augjtlers a�iil Soris r<< j�'ork� Day to help our daughters and snr�s reach their,�l�ll ; ��-�t:�r�!:.r! r,. ��Ir��-�. fam i 1 y 1 ife, ty, ;'�. t e comn:uni an t eir� r:,r-1r� �. ��:-,� � �, �;, j�'HEREAS, Take Our Daughters and Sons to i��u��k U��' u`t.�i�j�t, �tlli/�)1'(I!)lUi� c�cti►�itr��s i! � C12C0111'Qg� ,�;,-1�� ,1�1�� r�?�ti� �r� r1zl?tl' �t�r>> J�trrt�� l�l�'T�' r��'�';r f7,' fl;,' �;t!��•��' �'r7tt r', � , ,l r '_� ,': :1�... {j //j,�'L:-j 5, I1lI'ulc�%1 lill� �'tiil�tli/r.�ricl� �'_1�� i'ici��'c �1!'i.� �lilcl i>Ul'.� f%c'h:ii lv .�c� r�i�' �(�rii:� C I i� %;; bet�veen stterliE�� r,1 .1rkc� »1rr�lr. I'f��li.cla. .�cic�rtc CIf1(j lI?Pll �rt�,r�lit tn 1%,�. tit�orld; a�u� WHEREAS, Take C�i�r Daughters and Sons to Y�'ork �- -. ,.. � . �., :, -.� , , ;; , ; i � < < - .. � � � � � � : � - � , . � � � � � of jvb possibillrie and firtrrre oPp�rtttnitie.c re�nrc�le.c,c nf ,�en�er, r�cc �� backgrourrd; air� ' WHEREA.S', Take Our Da�rghters u�u� Sons to tif'ork`" l�uy ullu�t�s �irls und boys ti�� opportunity� to share lrl �y1C 1'1SlOrJ f ht�ildir�� .( ��t'f'�'i %1ii?(1�c'. il?�I��;ii?�' (l,'�';1' vision of todav their reality for tornorr�� NOW, THEREFORE, I, Richard Munson, Mayor u,j tlic.- �'i�ti� c�� . �1JU�C111C � 1��,llt.l, v�� 1>c-li�l�i �11 Ihe .Spokane i�alley City C'�r��lcil <rrr� thc� citi�c�».�• n�' llac� C'ilt• ��,�'1�nkrn7P i'nll�l dn hc�rc�l�_� proclaim ��rrv 14, 2009. a � Take Our Daugliters and Sons to Work" Dcri• LII1L� 1 QI1C0111"�I�r(' li�C'l"l� (1 ��Il�'l)1('.C,�'(�S (1/1Cj I)I'��(lill�(tlll))11' /ll t'1!(�� ri?�t !i:; � �r1;•r�.��'�11i! :li;�� 1I.� ��il►'�!L'1 �)f (J1�.� 1 �cllc'�t� 1{1!� 1 ,ill c1c11 ��J .��1c11 ,flli'�. � � �I, ;� +, � ; � -� �/ r f-'�'C�� " ! � � > � lchcrrd .�:s��%? �, � � _� frn��>>� � � - L" I, ....�.. �- r� r� c� �=„ S oka.ne p Valle y , �1'OC�cZlIl��ti011 OCder.,� mericarrs �Konth City of Spo kane �a �ey, �ashi rr� t c� ri j�'HERI:fLS', The cityuJSpuku►ie ��u!ley, l��u.,i�:��l_,��: i, �; ��,;,, . - �,t� ��:,�.-� r:� �;�� .�� r � �. � j il��.. i .�rt , ,,:��'��' (�;t �;' jrr�7Ji.'. i, ., {� N��<•��.5� ll/tlt'!� cl�!!l!'l.) 1/1 (1111� Ct1I117�)ll1i111j �Ir'�� (iil r!��`�ri!;% .';;i �.r:.��... .,'i�. „%. .� i�_' .'�!+!;, Pop�lation with evolving needs; af<<' f�'HEREAS, Older A»zericans are valuahle m��1;�,��:�,�� >> �,;� � , ,. �� ,,, ' � � � �: �� i, �, �t �;�! � l.;l�iii� r�, COI]II712U11�IC'S C1j11� I�� i'�i'i;<<� 1�:1't �;1�,''�f �'HEREAS, The i�tcreasing nt�l�tl�c>> uj t��b}�-duu�iE�� i�c�c�c�iti,t� tl�c�c�itl� 1 �,:: � ,� : � : ; : �: ;,: � �, ,, �� ji'(' 1?{'('�� )(' l►1('/'�'(��'�'(�.t7j�ij)OT'l (lf�"),�i�i'1' ;1L� Cll��i; � � {f 11L1.L.-L l� !.� 111� / �.��_��;i�1�':(ll.l ��! iil�� i c�i%iJli�ii:;ll�'.� lii 1t �!I r� c��ll<<''�c�l ii:�."�. � 1 � ;i� �(�;.li'�'� � older adults' unique health and long-term care challenges and �hat systems c�; cure are moder»ized to hc�lr� e'ninnl��c�r ��lcic .-�rrr��ri� �rf�c ��i��c� tl��m mnr� cnntrol over their own live.� NOW, THEREFORE, 1, Richard Murtsojt, ,�luy'o�' o,� tlic L'tty uJ S�uku»�.� 1"ullc.�y�, u�t heflc�l,f ��; 1�1C' S�7n�CQr2e ��C1jlel' ��1';� � r�iili�'l� cl%;�l 111�' �'llf.-t'�?� r>� jl;�' �!t_1' r'�/ ,��r��Ct�lc' ��t1� tj;� �;c'7'i'�)l proclaim Mu_��, _, ' 'I -� : � � (I1�/c�;• : li�rt�j•ic�tl�i� .�1r1i111� , t � (li:ii � c!l��li!l��l�i �1��%��tt%ll� It- l�li�:�' 1i�1:�� 1�ti�� IL�:I� �r� I�;��%r��)' ��7: r�J��.�i� �1:�;�if\ (ii,.. �'1c� � . prufessivnuls, family mem.her.r, nnd rrti�en.r K�h� care_;� �� rlr� ��. I�ated this 12th dnl� n1'.�1�1u1� 200� , t , ,, � . , � � i� �7 r,�%�� (/ �� s � IC�ItII'; � j �?: f? �'r"�? i ' l' � ��,' �;J1'� �� : < � S`�"'okane p Valle � y . �L'OC��Y1�Zt(4It �ationaCSafe Boating �Veek City of Spokane �alrey, `Gt�asFiington l�i�HEKI UVL')' Ititi �o-third� uJ�u111atal boatiiir Clc'C'li�t'llt 1'l�'lll)l�' �l!'(��t'11�'��. Uilcl (�f l�l��.��', ��(l`.%r� tt'c'1'E' llr�f lt'i'c1l'Ij?�� 1 llfc' JClC'�ii'l.: clil�j I��IER��-1S, U»1��1-�;'�o uj c�t�cttlt.� c�c,��trf (�ll ��.�.�c�./.� <<�I1c� lltc' ri)��1'illr�i' I ��r�l r��c��r��c� hoating safery instruction QI1 c 1 WHEREAS, The majority of boating accidejits ure caused by human er�� r ��1- ��<�� j r�� i�, �l: ��-�: il??ii I;l�l j 1 l��)i!!. �'�llll��lilt')Il Ul' � ilt'il•i�l�li;�')li�l� ��1�'T��t',�.� ll�i�� H�K�.�.S, :� S1�!)l�lc'U)I! 11IU)lbt')' UJ bUUlt'/'J' Ib'llU lc)SC' lj1L'll' lll't;.� ��l' c l�%'r :;�, �,+: i%:" ��, ��'l 1��'� l% lt't??l�C� J1t' c1�11't' ��c�;71' �li7(�!j1C'1' lt'+�7'1] !jl('l�' ll�' Tl!['�'i'/�'• t(" �� Elf:��if.�. 1.�, ` :I ; i. � . �. . , , ,: ��li�.i:ili c'�ili�.� � l�l� �ll(%/i ��f:r��.. Jiil��l� �� i�i�tfi��' .11��i� fi';+��t � than sn�les of years �ast and shot�ld be t�tilrzed b�7 the boating pr�bli� NOW, THEREFORE, I, Richard Alitnsv►z, �layor of'the City of Spokane t'allc�y�, ort behalf of the Spokane i'alley City Cotrrr�•il �r�rr� ll�r° c•i�i-��frc ��f rl�t� �'rtt• nf ,C,��krr�tc� i�r.11��. ��n Irc�rc�1�1 '�r'�� '�,:��. � ��.�� ?�: _ -,� , �"t!l�) , , 1 _. . . ��llllUll(lI S 'afe �UUllil� j� E,'C' u,rd 1 e�icourage all those who bvat to st�pport the goals of � tl�e Nvr111 �me� '1CCJ17 S 'u�e Boul i� 1� r .,. ��C1II1�7Q1�!?, �111j8C� ��rRjeS �r)11�c'l' �CIUcI�l%'i��il�. �li;�� il?l�'tl ,�!iilc'� � �l��l�'l �r?1�1?'c� . li:.t'I!i�t?'l� �l�lc f�� nractice safe boatirT,� 1�:<>>:!� Datcd thi.c 12th tici�� 1 .tJ��i� 'i��. , � � � - a � � -- - � � i , ._ ►. ,, - - � /` �� • . � � ' ` /yr�—�tf � IChCI . 'flll'l.cnjl ,� �(Ij'<71' CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 12, 2009 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: � consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Following Vouchers: BACKGROUND: VOUCHER LIST DATE VOUCHER NOS. TOTAL VOUCHER AMOUNT 04/23/2009 17133 —17194 $387,943.19 04/24/2009 17195 — 17215 $75,695.29 04/28/2009 17216 $250.00 05/01 /2009 17259 —17285 $26, 373.75 GRAND TOTAL $490,262.23 RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Approve claims for vouchers as listed above. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: Ken Thompson ATTACHMENTS Voucher Lists vchitst Voucher List Page: 1 04/2312009 9:05:17AM Spokane Vailey Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptioNAccount Amount 17133 4/16/2009 000796 BUDINGER 8 ASSOC INC M07309-6 41954 MATERIAL TESTING #0016 17,128.00 Total : 17�128.00 17134 4/16/2009 000796 BUDINGER & ASSOC INC M07309-7 41954 MATERIAL TESTING #0016 369.50 Total : 369.50 17170 4/20/2009 000379 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY BLA-02-09 BLA-02-09 PINESMIANSFIELD #0�0 98.00 Total : 98.00 17171 4l20/2�09 001948 AFFORDABLE DCCELLENCE 09-0789 REFUND REFUND PRE-APP FEES 250.00 Total : 250.00 17172 4/20/2009 001948 AFFORDABLE IXCELLENCE 09-0798 REFUND REFUND PRE-APP FEES 250.00 Total : 250.00 17173 4/21l2�09 001916 PN AMERICA Registration 42282 PTV VISION VISUM: R KIPP 950.00 Total : 950.00 17174 4/22J2009 001534 ALL PRINT 11741 LOGO ENVELOPES: CD 266.32 Total : 266.32 17175 4122l2009 000335 ALTON'S TIRE INC. 6-41145 OIL CHANGE: 40209D 36.99 Tobl : 36.99 17176 4�009 000234 ARLT. SHANE Expenses REIMBURSEMENT FOR CELL PHO� 108.69 Total : 108.69 17177 4/2?J2009 001606 BANNER BANK 0620 MAR 09: DEMPSEY 79.90 0638 MAR 09: GOTHMANN 1,774.96 2832 MAR 09: 2832 1,526.30 4342 MAR 09: DENENNY 25.00 4359 MAR 09: TAYLOR 1,714.95 4383 MAR 09: WILH(TE 25.00 4458 MAR 09: PASSMORE 2,121.56 4474 MAR 09: THOMPSON 2,612.26 Total : 9,879.93 Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List Page 2 04/23/2009 9:05:17AM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptionlAccount Amount 17178 4/2?J2009 000379 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY fi368 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 20.97 6370 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 8.13 Total : 29.10 17179 4/22/2009 001048 CITY PARCEL 3290081 MAR 09: COURIER SERVICE 18.14 Total : 18.14 17180 4/22/2009 000618 DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE 4048 MAPS FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS 64.00 Total : 64.00 17181 4/22/2009 001280 DEPT OF LICENSING 00002186 4TN QTR 2008: MLS CREDIT CARD 239.18 Total : 239.18 17182 4/72/2009 000409 DEPT OF REVENUE 1 st Qtr 2009 1 ST QUARTER 2009: EXCISE TAX 192.60 Total : 192.60 17163 4/22/2009 000746 EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPT 1 ST QTR 09 1 ST QUARTER 2009: UI TAX 125.52 Total : 125.52 17184 4/2212009 000106 FEDEX 9-146-36509 SHIPPING SERVICE: LEGAL 63.76 Total : 63.76 17185 4P22/'LOQ9 000179 GFOA 2611834 REGISTRATION BALANCE: DUFFEI 36.00 Totai : 36.00 17186 4/22/2009 000002 H& H BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC. 093313 TONER: 14915 93.87 Total : 93.87 17187 4/22/2009 001729 HALME CONSTRUCTION, INC. Retainage RETAINAGE RELEASED #0053 47,175.64 Total : 47,175.64 17188 4/22/2009 000993 LES SCHWAB T1RE CENTER 126472 WINTER CHANGEOVER: 06769D 59.79 Total : 59.79 17189 4/22/2009 001852 NATL RESEARCH CEI�JTER, INC 3340 NATL CITIZEN SURVEY 3,950.00 Total : 3�950.00 17190 4/22/2009 000307 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER FEB 09 CASH RECEIPTS JOURNAL SUMMf 98,776.13 Page: 2 vchlist Voucher List Page: 3 04123/2009 9:�5:17AM Spokane Vailey Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptioNAccount Amount 17190 4I2212009 000307 OFFICE Oi= THE STATE TREASURER (Continuec� JAN 09 CASH RECEIPTS JOURNAL SUMM� 48,268.24 MAR 09 CASH RECEIPTS JOURNAL SUMMf 79,613.22 Total : 226,657.59 17191 4/22/2009 000512 OFFICETEAM 23566842 STAFFING SERVICE: LASERFICHE 639.78 23566843 STAFFING SERVICE: LASERFICHE 652.00 Total : 1,291.78 17192 4f1212009 000308 SPOKANE CO PROSECUTING ATTY FE8 09 CRIME VICTIMS COMP FUND 1,387.04 JAN 09 CRIME VICTIMS COMP FUND 666.97 MAR 09 CRIME VICTIMS COMP FUNO 1,135.03 Total : 3.189.04 17193 4/22/2009 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 010020000600228 2008 VOTER REGISTRATION COST 74,461.80 Total : 74,461.80 17194 4/22/2009 000065 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 3106338431 OFFICE SUPPLIES: CD 9.18 3116595573 OFFICE SUPPLIES: CD 399.03 3116822176 OFFICE SUPPLIES: CD 164.81 3117083258 OFFICE SUPPLIES: CO 182.19 3117319556 OFFICE SUPPLIES: CD 16.94 3117615315 OFFICE SUPPLIES: CD 185.80 Total : 957.95 27 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 387.943.19 27 Vouchers in thia report Total vouchers : 387�943.19 M Page: 3 vchlist Voucher List Page: 4 04/23/2009 9:05:17AM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptionlAccount Amount 1, the undersigned, do certify under penatty of perjury, that the materiais have been fumished, the seroices rendered, or the tabor performed as described herein and tt�at the Gaim is Just, due end en unpaid obligation against the City ot Spakane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and c8rtify to sa(d claim. Flnanoe Diredor Date Page: 4 vchlist Vou�he� List Page 1 04/24J2009 1:51:01 PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptionlAccount Amount 17195 4/24/2009 vendcode 1 ST LINE 1 ST AID INC 11453 FIRST AID/CPR TRAINING 640.00 Total : 640.00 17196 4/24/2009 vendcode AIRFACTZ 28768 DRIViNG RECORD: HR 25.00 Total : 25.00 17197 4/24/2009 vendcode ALSCO LSP0591212 FLOOR MATS: CtTY HALL 14.47 LSP0594795 FLOOR MATS: PRECINCT 17.97 Total : 32.44 17198 4/24/2009 vendcode BERK 8 ASSOCIATES 5682-03-09 COLLABORATIVE GRANT: CD 2,313.75 Total : 2�313.75 17199 4/2412009 vendcode CODE PUBLISHING CO 32805 MUNICIPAL CODE UPDATE 206.96 Total : 206.96 17200 4/24/2009 vendcode COFFEE SYSTEMS INC 3820:021876 COFFEE SUPPLIES 60.30 3820:021892 COFFEE SUPPLIES 220.33 3820:023011 COFFEE SUPPLIES 269.10 3820:023565 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 32.90 Total : 582.63 17201 4/24/2009 vendcode DEX MEDIA WEST April 2009 ADVERTISING: CP 40.00 Total : 40.00 17202 4/24/2009 vendcode EASTERN WA ATTORNEY SVC, INC 23690 LEGAL SERVICES 40.00 24067 LEGAL SERVICE 40.00 24403 LEGAL SERVICES 45.Q0 Total : 125.00 17203 4/24/2009 vendcode MARKETING SOLUTIONS NW CP 4-1409 Media ADVERTISING:CP 2,788.30 CP 4-14-09 P&P ADVERTISING: CP 1,123.20 CP 4-1409 Postage ADVERTISING: CP 2,181.80 Total : 6,093.30 17204 4/24/2009 vendcode MICROFLEX INC. 18480 TAXTOOLS SOFTINARE RENTAL 343.83 Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List Page 2 04/24/2009 1:51:01 PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Ve�dor Invoice PO #t Description/Account Amount 17204 4/24/2009 vendcode vendcode MICROFLDC INC. (Continued) Tota� ; 343.83 17205 4/24/2009 vendcode NORTHWEST BUSINESS STAMP INC. 72861 STAMPS: CD 2p2,g7 Total : 202.6T 17206 4/24/2009 vendcode OFFICET�EAM 23602991 STAFFING SERVICE: LASERFICHE 631.63 23602992 STAFFING SERVICE: LASERFICHE 643.85 Total : 1,275.48 17207 4/24/2009 vendcode ONEEIGHTY NETVVORKS 646498 ETHERNET: APRIL 503.34 Total : 503.34 17208 4/24/2009 ve�dcode PURRFECT LOGOS, INC. 23421 REPLACE GRAPHICS ON PD CRUI; 149.46 2�78 SAFETY SIGNS 65.� Total : 214.68 17209 4/2412009 vendcode SERVICE PAPER CO 30446032 SUPPLIES: PRECINCT 190.46 3��9 SUPPLIES: PRECINCT 45.66 Total : 236.12 17210 4/24/2009 vendcode SPOKANE REG SPORTS COMMISSIO� 1 st Qtr 2009 LODGING TAX REIMBURSMENT 27,500.00 Total : 27�500.00 17211 4/24/2009 vendcode SPOKESMAN-REVIEW 94712 SPRAGUE/PINES PCCP INTERSEC' 609.40 Total : 609.40 17212 4/24/2009 vendcode SRCAA 64 2ND QTR 2009 28,999.50 Total : 28,999.50 17213 4/24/2009 vendcode STATE AUDITOR'S OFFICE L76369 AUDITORS 3,834.10 Total : 3,834.10 17214 4/24/2009 vendcode TVV TELECOM 02867457 INTERNET/DATA LINES 1,663.14 Total : 1 �663.14 17215 4/24/2009 vendcode WfTHERSPOON, KELLEY 229552 PROFESSIONAL SVCS 253.95 Total : 253.95 21 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 75�695.29 Page: 2 vchlist Voucher List Page: 3 04/24/2009 1:51:01 PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptloNAccount Amount 21 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 75.695.29 I, the undersigned, do certtl� under penalty of pe�Jury, that the materiais have been fumished, the services re�dered, or the Isbo� perfom�ed as described herein and thaE the daim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the Cfty of Spokane Valiey, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify to safd claim. F(nance Diredor Date Page: 3 vchlist Voucher List Page 1 04/28/2009 3:54:28PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 17216 4/28/2009 001076 CONNELLY, MICHAEL 428-09 TRAVEL EXPENSES/HOTEL 250.�0 Total : 250.00 1 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 250.00 1 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 250.00 I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, tfiat the materials have been fumished, the services rendered, o� tfie labor pe�fortned as desuibed herein and that the claim is just� due and an unpaid obligation agafnst the City of Spokane Valley, and thet I am authorized to authenticate and ce�tify to said claim. Finance Director Date Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 05/01/2009 11:45:51AM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Descriptlon/Account Amount 17259 5/112009 000921 A TO Z RENTALS 190322 FURNITURE RENTAL: CP 73.05 Total : 73.05 17260 5/1/2009 001081 ALSCO LSP0598454 FLOOR MATS: CITY HALL 14.47 LSP0602091 FLOOR MATS: SHERIFF 17.97 Totai : 32.44 17261 5/1/2009 000221 AM PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC 2009 MEMBERSHIP 147.00 Total : 147.00 17262 5/1/2009 001938 BERGER/ABAM ENGINEERS INC 15111 PROFESSIONAL SVCS: PLANNING 3,037.59 Total : 3.037.59 17263 5M/2009 001409 BEST LINE 0531Q4162009 ANSWERING SVCS: CP 20.00 Total : 20.00 17264 5/1/2009 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC 0063386 LINEN SERVICE: CP 75.63 9015087 LINEN SERVICE: CP 181.17 9016970 LINEN SERVICE: CP 373.84 Total : 630.64 17265 5/1/2009 000148 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORMS 8 EQUIP 741795 EMBLEM CHANGE: COSV PD 8.15 Total : 8.15 17266 5/1/2009 000109 COFFEE SYSTEMS INC 3820:024556 COFFEE SUPPLY: CP 170.04 Total : 170.04 17267 5/1/2009 001888 COMCAST MAY 2009 HIGH SPEED INTERNET 108.95 Total : 108.95 172G8 5/1/2009 000326 CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION #19 APRIL 2009 WATER CHARGES 279.56 Total : 279.56 17269 5/1J2009 000823 DEPT OF L& I 186908 BOILER INSPECTION: CP 358.40 Total : 358.40 17270 5/1/2009 000912 DEX MEDIA WEST APRIL 2009 ADVERTISING CHARGES:CP 225.00 Page: 1 vchlist Vou�her List Page 2 05/01/2009 11:45:51AM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 17270 5/1 /2009 000912 000912 DEX MEDIA WEST (Continued) Total : 225.00 17271 5/1/2009 000010 FEDEX KINKO'S 289700006154 PRINTING: AQUATICS FLYER: CP 682.64 Total : 682.64 17272 5/1/2009 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 31951 LEGAL PUBLICATION 25.00 31952 LEGAL PUBLICATION 101.15 31953 LEGAL PUBLICATION 36.55 31997 LEGAL PUBLICATION 94.00 31998 LEGAL PUBLICATION: SPRAGUE A' 119.75 32000 NOTICE OF ORDINANCE PASSED 28.90 32001 LEGAL PUBLICATION 96.05 32002 LEGAL PUBLICATION 46.75 Total : 548.15 17273 5/1/2009 001465 GAVIN ASSOCIATES Billing # 2 42174 CONSULTING SERVICES 2,565.00 Total : 2,565.00 17274 5/1/2009 001940 GROUP MOBIIE INTL 10097 42345 GD-ITRONlX GC6000 LAPTOPS FOI 10,899.00 Total : 10,899.00 17275 5/1/2009 000472 LAWTON PRINTING 24471 ANNUAL AUDIT REPORT PRINTING 570.68 Total : 570.68 17276 5/1/2009 001002 M 8 L SUPPLY CO., INC. 913601.1 SUPPLIES: CENTERPLACE 286.11 Total : 286.11 17277 5/1/2009 000788 MEDIA JOE, INC. 3051 ELECTRICIAN SERVICES: CP 90.60 Total : 90.60 17278 5/1/2009 000512 OFFICETEAM 23636803 STAFFING SERVICE: LASERFICHE 603.10 23636804 STAFFING SERVICE: LASERFICHE 652.00 Total : 1 �255.10 17279 5h/2009 001860 PLATT 5962728 SUPPLIES: CENTERPLACE 58.87 Total : 58.87 17280 5/1/2009 000322 QWEST 509-921-G787 511B PHONE SERVICE 46.33 Page: 2 :�;, : vchilst Voucher List Page: 3 05/01/2009 11:45:51AM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor invoice PO # Descriptlon/Account Amount 17280 5/112009 000322 �WEST (Continued) 509-922-7091 060B PHONE SERVICE: MISSION POOL 109.30 50&926-1840 1946 PHONE SERVICE: PARK RD POOL 109.30 Total : 264.93 17281 5/1/2009 000709 SENSKE LAWN & TREE CARE INC. 3445434 TREE PLANTING: MIRABEAU 190.23 Total : 190.23 17282 5/1f1009 000935 SERVICE PAPER C� 30447712 SUPPLIES: CENTERPLACE 1,878.65 30447726 SUPPLIES: PRECINCT 775.49 Total : 2,654.14 17283 5/1/2009 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST #3 170-0040-03 WATER CHARGES: PARKS 32.95 475-1495-00 UTILITIES: PW 8.96 Total : 41.91 17284 5/1/2009 000420 SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DIST 1st QTR 2009 WATER TESTING 159.00 Total : 159.00 17285 5/1/2009 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 24557042fi61-8 WASTE MGMT: CP 731.30 2455705-2681-5 WASTE MGMT: PRECINCT 285.27 Total : 1,016.57 27 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 26�373.75 27 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 26,373.75 i, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of pe�jury, that the materiats have been fumished, the services rendered, or the labor perfortned as described herein and that tfie claim is jus� due and an unpaid obiigation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authentfcate and certify to said claim. Finance Director Date Page: 3 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 12, 2009 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: � consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ p:�bl�c n�.ar�r,a n inforr�ation ❑ a�t��ir repart ❑ F�n�in�� I��is'�t��r� AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Payroll for Period Ending April 30, 2009 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: OPTIO�VS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Gross: $230,165.46 Benefits: $127,392.40 TOTAL PAYROLL� $357, 557.86 STAFF CONTACT: Ken Thompso; . ,��T�ACHM�NTS DRA FT MINUTES City of Spokane Valley City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, April l�, 2009 Mayor �-lunson called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. and welcomed ever��one to the 1�7th meeting. Attenda�rce: Cih� Staff R.ich Munson, Mayor Dave Mercier, City Manager Dick Denenny, Deputy Mayor Mike Jackson, Depaty City Manager Rose Dempsey, Councilmember Mike Connelly, City Attorney Bill Gothmann, Councilmember Ken Thompson, Finance Director Gary Schimmels, Councilmember Neil Kersten, Public Works Director Steve Taylor, Councilmember Kathy McClung, Community Development Dir. Diana Wilhite, Councilmember Mike Stone, Parks & Recreation Director Greg McCormick, Planning Manager Mike Basinger, Senior Planner Karen Kendall, Associate Planner Christi�a Janssen, Assistant Planner Marty Palaniuk, Planning Technician John Whitebead, Human Resources Manager Carolbelle Branch, Public Information Officer Chris Bainbridg City Clerk INVOCATION: Pastor John Vanderwalker of Community Christ Church gave the invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Members of Girl Scout Daisy Troop #3679 led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roIl; all Councilmembers were presenr. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: It was mo��ed hy Gouncilmember Trrylor, seconded and ruianinrously� agreed to approl�e the amended agenda. INTRODUCTION QF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: n/a CUMMITTEE, BUAItU, LIAISON SUMMAItY REPORTS: Councilmember Schimmels: reported that about three weeks ago he attended a Grand Opening for Meals on Wheels at North Crestline; attended a Solid Waste Advisory Committee meeting as well as the liaison board meeting last week. Councilmember Wilhite: reported that she attended the SRTC (Spokane Regional Transportation Commission) meeting and met with members of that staff; attended an Association of Industries breakfast; a meeting of the Kootenai transportation group; an open house at Pine Ridge for their ne«� Alzheimer's facility; attended the Spokane Valley Chamber's luncheon to hear our Mayor speak; also attended the Walt Worthy open house for that new building; attended the Greater Spokane, Inc. Armed Forces luncheon earlier today where awards were given to members of the military for their participation in community affairs; and attended the Liberiy Lake open house. Councilmember Tavlor: mentioned he also attended the opening of the Walt Worthy buiiding. Deputy Mayor Denennv, and Councilmembers Gothmann and Dempsev had no report. MAYOR'S REPORT: Mayor Munso� reported that last week he gave the State of the City Report at the Chamber luncheon; met with Mayor Verner to discuss common issues; attended a meeting here dealing C'ouncil Re�ular i�9eeting: 0-�-1-�-2009 F'a�c 1 nf l� Approved by Cauncil: DRAFT with wastewater treatment plant issues and mentioned the County's draft interlocal agreement that staff' i� reviewing and which Council will review later, attended the open house for the Walt Worthy building; attended a breakfast with Commissioner Richard; met with some Intermountain Bank representatives, several of whom attended an open house at CenterPlace about a month ago, and they expressed their desire to get involved with some community projects, and Mayor Munson said he mentioned SARP as a possibility for them to help developers look at the plan; and he attended a three-day course for emergency management training. PUBLIC COMME�JTS: Mayor Munson invited general public comments. Ian Robertson, 1716 S Rotchford Drive: said he wanted to give a report from the Panhandling Committee and discuss a clean air proposal using federal grants to help fund infrastructure improvements without increasing local taxes. Regarding panhandling, Mr. Robertson said that Council appointed a committee last year to investigate what could be done about the growing panhandling problem, and said when Council is ready, tliat Committee would like to give a presentation to Council; the committee has three recommendations such as safety and secwity issues which would require local ordinance changes, said that about 20% of panhandlers need genuine help in dealing with drug problems and/or mental illness, and he said the Committee will recommend that police and others may refer those people to existing social service agencies, and that the Committee wiIl recommend suthorizing a PAC (panhandling action committee) to educate the public about the problem; and Mr. Robertson volunteer to lead such a group if that is Council's desire. Mr. Robertson said he was informed by one panhandler that he made between $60 and $80 every two hours, and the panhandlers himself told Mr. Robertson that there is something wrong when a panhandlers outside Wal-Mart can make more money in one day then an employee of Wal- Mart. Regarding turning trash into cash, Mr. Robertson said he distributed a copy of a letter previously given to Mayor Munson regarding Community Minded Enterprises, of which Mr. Robertson is a member, wrote a$4.1 million grant application for F.B. ScoSolutions (a Spokane Valley company) to the Department of Energy to build an Advanced Anaerobic Digester System and a Methanol Reactor somewhere in Washington State; and said if this is built adjacent to the Waste-to-Energy plant by the Spokane airport, and if our City, Spokane City and Spokane County designate the new federal energy block gants of $3.5 million, this facility could be built without local or state tax money; and he explained it would provide clean energy that could provide a source of income for Spokane Valley and its neighbors for years to come; and would save millions of dollars by not hauling over 66,000 tons of waste every year to the Regional Landfill in Klickitat County. Mr. Robertson said he is available to make a presentation to Council later on this issue as well. Chuck Trimborn, Pastor of Glad Tidin�s Church, , located at 4224 East 4''' Street in Spokane• he said the church owns some property hitty-corner from the church which is in Spokane Valley; he said about a year ago, church members decided to sell two and one-half lots of that above-mentioned property, and as thcy prepared to sell, ttiey discovered the zoning had been changed so that they could not sell the lots as r�sidential lots; that they spoke to our staff and were told that the zoning was going to change back to what it had been previously, and therefore the Church members decided to wait until that zoning was reverted back to residential; he said it is important that the Church can sell those lots as the Ghurch needs the finances and does not need the (ots. Harrv Sladich, President of the Spokane Regional Convention and Visitor's Bureau: e�plained that he was asked to come by Liz Beck to discuss or answer questions regarding the TPA (Tourism Promotion Area); and regarding CenterPlace, he said that they have worked with Director Mike Stone and his staff, and Mr. Sladich said that individual hotels in Spokane Valley feel they don't have a tool to markct CenterPlace; and Mr. Sladich referred to several handouts he had distributed concerning hotels and CenterPlace; and said the desire with these marketing materials is to give each hotel in Spokane Valley an independent piece to have them market their hotel on one side of the sheet, and CenterPlace on the other; and Mr. Sladich said there ��rere some hoteliers who chose not to participate; that the Bureau has its o«�n Council Regular Meeting: 04-14-�009 1'age 2 of 1� Approvcd by Gouncil: DRA FT marketing materials for CenterPlace; but this is just another piece paid for by the CVB (Convention and Visitor's Buresu) to give each individual hotel so they can sell not only their establishment, but CenterPlace as well; which appeared to be the "missing link" when they found that some of the hotels were frustrated and felt that perhaps the Center or the Bureau wasn't recommending them, and this is a tool to give them the power to do that; and he cnentioned the next step is a meeting scheduled at CenterPlace with the hotels, the CVB, and Director Stone, to discuss how to execute this program. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Amendment #2. 2009 Transportation Improvement Pro�ram (TIP) — Steve Worle Mayor Munson opened the public hearin� at 6:21 �.m. and in��ited I��ir. Kersten to explain the pm�osal. Public Works Director Kersten explained that this is the second amendment to the 2009 TIP and includes minor changes as they previously omitted the Sprague ADA Improvement projects which need to be part of the plan in order to use REET funds; and he expla.ined that the project would upgrade sidewalks from Universit� to Sullivan; and that staff also recommends proceeding with the design of the Bowdish Road, 32" to S Project and the Evergreen/32° 16�' to 232" Evergreen to SR 27 Project as well. Mr. Kersten said the 2009 budget has sufficient funds to accommodate the projects associated with this amendment. Mayor Munson added that the $7 million would be offset by $28,241,000 from other sources, adding that it is good to have those dollars funneled back to Spokane Valley. Mayor Munson invited pul�lic comment; no comments were ofj`'ered and May or Munson clased the public hearin� at 6:?3 p.m. 2. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of itents cor�siJered routine �vhich are appro�•ed as a group. A Councilmember may remove an item from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. a. Claim Vouchers, Voucher # 16902 through # 17059; 3309014 and 401090010: $2,946,100.58 b. Payroll for pay period ending March 31, 2009: $363,973.16 c. Approval of Interlocal Agreement with State of Washington Department of Licensing d. Approval of Regular Council Meeting Minutes of March 24, 2009 e. Approval of Council Study Session Minutes of March 3], 2009 It was moti�ed by Cor�ncilnrember Tcrti-lnr, seco�lded, a�rd tmcnlinrously ng rc�ed lo nppro►>e �he c�»>.cerrt a�e�tda. NEW �3USINESS: 3. Sec�nd Reading Proposed Ordinance 09-005 Airport Overlay — Karen Kendall After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Counciln:ember Gothmann and seconded to atlopt Ordinarrce 09-OOS with Optio�i 2 l3�SDOT. Assistant Planner Kendall went over her PowerPoint presentation explaining the proposed ordinance and the various options; followed by Council comment concerning the process for camprehensive plan changes or zoning code amendments. Mayor Munson invited public comment. "I'anya Chestnut, and Steve Blanford, 3204 East Rivercrest, Post Falls, Idaho: Ms. Cbestnut explained that they own property located at 7524 Buckeye, and as previously explained, have a sewer and water hookup with a house on one side and the water and sewer already in; that they were told they couldn't build on it; that they would like to be able to build there, that noise is not an issue, but if they can't build they would have a$50,000 lot and not be able to do anything ��vith it; and she encouraged Counci! to make a decision tonight as the cost of lumber continues to rise. Neil Sealock, Director of Spokane Airport and Felts Field: he said he speaks on behalf of the Board: that they take seriously their public responsibility to make recommendations and to safeguard those essential public facilities; that Felts Field operates on federal dollars; that there are commercial and publie services which they must protect for existing and future uses; that he realizes the challenges the local govemment has to preclude incapability use around the airports, and he asked that use be compatible with the development around the airport. Council Regular N�e�ting: 0=�-14-�009 Page 3 of !�l Approved by Council� DRAFT Carter Timmerman, WSDOT Aviation Division; 3704 172�' Street, Arlington, WA; said that he wanted to clarify WSDOT's proposal as mentioned previously; he referred to his handouts showing various airport runways such as Anacortes and Evergreen, along with the traffic pattern for Felts Field and his map showing his proposal of division of zone 6 along Utah street and East Rutter; he said there are 182 sewers which abut south of Utah and there is significant more developable land south of Utah, and said their proposal will allow more development and better use of infrastructure and will minimize impacts on the airport and protect the airport; and that they want a proposal which will reduce future conflict. John Townsley, 607 West Montgomery Ave Spokane: explained that he represe�ts the Washington Pilots Association Board of Directors, and said he appreciates the challenging task before Council; that he supports the comments made by Director Sealock regarding the importance of Felts Field and in terms of the value the airport brings to the community; that it is clearly not just used by smaller aircra.ft; and he supports Mr. Timmerman's analysis and said he believes Mr. Timmerman and the Aviation Division presented Council with opportunities to protect the airport and address tlie need for continued development within Spokane Valley; but said he has concerns with the criteria as written; he said the first criteria is clear; but he said the other two criteria have the potential to allow the area to grow significantly more then the first criteria; and he suggested the better alternative is to avoid bringing additional residential dwellings into the area and asked that Council consider striking the second criteria from the thr� criteria presented in the proposed ordinance. Dwi�ht Hume, 9101 N Mountain View Lane, Spokane: said he has been attending the meetings with Council and the Planning Commission; said he was unaware of the introduction of this new subject of option 2 until he read it on the web this afternoon, and said he was told otherwise by staff that option 4 was what was being proposed; he said this zone 6 is a noise zone and not a crash zone; he said they developed and offered and there is incorporated into the suggested motio�, that there is a declaration on the face of the short plat or plat warning the buyer of moving into a noisy area; and said more significantly, this is a situation which is all infill, and these are homes that will be built �ti�ith today's construction standards and will be quieter than the homes currently in the area; he said the airport officials are saying this is a crash zone and therefore is a safety problem; and he said there is no difference between the houses north and south of Rutter; the infill and the precaution of putting the statement on the plat �vill give a better and quieter home then otherwise; and he said there is no distinction and Council would be discriminating between the two with no factual basis other than a statement from the airport buard that they realiy are worried about Felts Field closing; but Mr. Hume said this is not going to close down and more importantly, there is a water district which has begged for a change so the hookups and expense can be recovered in revenues; and he emphasized his desire to keep this in its entirety and to keep the lot owners on both sides of Rudder and Utah with the rights and privileges of the same; and go ��►�ith the original proposal which is option A. Mil:e King, commercial realtor, business address 9300 E Spra�ue Avenue: said he is representing Life River Fellowship Church, located at 2819 N Park Road; and located adjacent to Victory Faith Fellowship Church and Orchard elementary School; he said the Church would like to include a Community FaciIities Zone which would allow the churches and the school to continue to be in compliance with zoning and allow them building permits for alternations and improvements; he said to his knowledge, neither church is planning an expansion, but this would simply allow them that option; he said by including the community facilities zone as it eurrently is, it will allow the churches to sell their property or use it or recoup their investment if they decide ihey need to move; he said that both churches are aware of the airport overlay and have been to the zoning hearings; both che Pastors would be willing to sign papers stating they are aware of the Felts Field airport traffic and the noise issue; and not to hinder airport operations of Felts Field in the future; and said they need the community facilities zone reinstated as it is now, into the new ordinance to protect the future of their properties. Mayor Munson said Could would like staff to get back to council on this issue, and said he is not sure that zoning change is part of the Council Regular Meeting: 04-14-2009 Pa�c •i of 1�1 ��pprovcd by Council: DRAFT ardinancc under discussiun now; and �-tr. Connelly concurred it would be an additional z�ne chan�e for further consideration, and could be a comprehensive pla❑ chan�e as «�ell. Ma��or N1unson asked i�1r. King to coc�rdinate this issue ��it}i staff. Nancy Holmes, �412 N St. James Place, Spokane: said she represents the Spokane Airport "I�ennant Association; and she reminded council she spoke the fast time about their desire to reach a compromise on this issue; said the association appreciates the efforts of WSDOT and Spokane International Airport (SIA); and they care about the viability of Felis Field; and understands the situation of those trying to develop property in connection with this; she said the Association had a meeting and they are willing to support any of these options brought forward tonight as they believe in the best interest of all parties. Neal Sealock, Airport Director: said in reference to the comments regarding "crash zones" that that is an antidotal term not a term of art; there are runway protection zones, tra�ic patterns, and zones of use; and said the challenge with the option to the north with parcels to the north, is that it is in the tra�c pattern area; so the point is it is not simply a noise issue but is indeed an operational issue for the operation of the airport and not for the single runway, but for all landing services at Felts Fields, and said he was fortunate to have grass, unimproved, asphalt as well as water at a single location, therefore making them unique; and said that all of the processes and procedures offered refer to all those issues. Sharon Panther, 8004 East Glass: said she has been dealing with this since 2007; that 8004 E Glass is an acre of land; that they purchased the land in the 1990's and the County told them they could not subdivide until sewers were in; that sewers came in in 2005 and she contacted sta.ff about how to go about this; that they put in multiple stubs for water, sewer, gas and power; and said none of the plans �vould allow her to do what they had intended for that property; she said she met with one of the City's planners in 2007, she said she does not understand where this came from, tfiat no one published it but the previous mayor and councilmembers just did it; that she checked with other organizations such as DOT and she was told that this plan was adopted out of order; it was put into place long before the Comprehensive Plan w��s formulated; and said there is no one in Orchard Avenue who could shut down the airport even if the}� wanted to; that she has lived there 45 years; when this was put into action in 2006 the initial committee did not check with the airport, or the DOT and she said this was not mandated; and she asked where is option 4; she said that was going to be her retirement and now it will sit there and will have no resale if one is nat allowed to build on it; the house is 70 years old; and said if council decides ta �o south of the railroad tracks, what would it hurt to go north. Ravmonci Gunning, 621 S Thierman; and the two properties of concern are 361 S N Eli and 77189 E Glass; that he bought the properties in 2005 and talked to everyone to get the sewer and water hooked up; he has two separate residences; the houses are there which he bought as rentals; he submitted his packet and was told he could not proceed as the airport overlay was adopted; he said now, four years later, he's had the property sold three different times aod lost money on it; and is back here talking about new, proposed issues; that he attended the meeting in December where they thought option 4 was going to work to tak� care of all the different people involved in his position who have sewer and water stubs and wani to build their own places; and said he appreciates the time Council has put into this and hopes this can be worked out; and said with the Utah Rutter idea, he is in zone 6 so if the adoption is for the north of Utah, his properiy is out and he'll be stuck with two houses on one parcel with no value; that he paid his fees and is now being told he can't do anything because of the different options still being proposed. Josh Nerrren 8204 East Jackson: said he's south of Utah and in the same situation as others bere; he bought his house about eight years ago, he bought it as an investment as it had a separate piece which they believed could be subdivided; he was told he could wait until the sewer was in; the sewer was put ir�. they came back do�ti•n and «ras told f�e couldn't do it; and he said that there was no public announcement Council Regular Meetin�� i)�i-1-�-�OQ9 I'��c � ot� 1=1 Approvcd by Counci I � DRAFT that he was aware of or a meeting to discuss this, that it �vas just adopted; he said he's do��n by Trent and can't imagine why that would be affecting the airport. City Clerk Bainbridge read a letter from Edie Streicher, Government Affairs Director on behalf of the over 1,100 members of the Spokane Home Builders Association, which letter stated their support of the ordinance as presented as they believe it is a good compromise to previous options; and that notice posted on �ew plats as required by this ordinance will be sufficient notice to new home buyers of the possibility of increased aircraft noise. Mayor Munson invited further comments; no other comments were offered. Mayor Munson remarked that option 4 is now option 1. With Mayor Munson's consent, Dwi� t Hume commented again and said the letter from the Home Builders was in support of a motion but of a motion that was originally coming forward through the couneil, not option 2 but option 1. Mayor Munson said Council is aware of that. Council discussion pursued with remarks by Councilmcmber Gothmann about trying to manage a valuable facility while accommodating homeowners and their rights to develop their property; he distributed a sheet of facts regarding Felts Field, and said he got most of this information off the Intemet of Spokane International Airport, and he explained about the operations and the flights associated with the airport; he said there are four runways and not two, and he referenced the information from Mr. Woodward (Public Relations Marketing Director for SIA), Airport Layout Plan map, and handout on Felts Field showing information for prefight purposes and the length of the four runways; and added that there is also a water runway 6,000 ft long x 100 ft vvide; and between the two major runways is a grass strip so people can learn to fly on unpaved strips. Regarding tbe WSDOT proposal, Councilmember Gothrnann explained that there was a study he did showing scatter diagrams from runways in California, superimposed on this facility to demonstrate the rate of accidents in each zone; and he said he re-ran d�at information based on Mr. Timmerman's proposal and in zone 6a, the accident rate is 2.7 times the zone in 6b, and further explained that if you are within the 3,000 foot-zone, the accident rate is 2.7 times what it is between the 3,000-6,000; and that 6a is eighteen times what it is when you are a mile out from the runway; so Mr. Timmerman's proposal makes sense because it is based on sound fundamental statistics of aircraft accidents: there are more accidents closer to the runway then further away from the runway. Councilmember Gothmann said the subject of noise is also addressed, and said if you are twice as far from the runway, the noise would be one-fourth as much, based upon the assumption that the noise occurs in the middle of the sphere. Councilmember Gothmann mentioned the proposal to extend the runway another 550 feet; which will mean large aircraft can be accommodated which will result in more noise; adding that the noise we have today might not be the noise of the fuCure; and that we should be planning for the future noise; adding that Mr. Timmerman's proposal takes this into account; and said he supports the compromise to prohibit additional development north of Rutter; but feels the zoning oeeds to be changed north of Rutter, which is a separate issue to be taken up at a separate time as a comprehEnsive plan item. Councilmember Taylar said to support this option, we are operating off of two assumptions: one is that by building another 200 residences in this area within a noise zone, that this world bring on the demise of Felts Field; and second is the potential expansion of Felts Field, and said he feels input is needed from the community on whether bringing in larger aircraft is something that is compatible within an urban area so close to a significant number of residences; adding that we also need to protect the air facilities, and said that option 4 brought forward from staff adequately reaches a compromise to make sure properry owners who have invested in potential new residences, can be made whole at the same time insuring we don't have unreasonable eneroachment upon the airport; and said that we currently have the most restrictive airport zoning guidelines of anywhere i� Spokane County; and more restrictive then most communitie� throughout Washington state; and said this compromise only within zone 6 is adequate to meet everyone's needs. Regarding the sewer stubs, Councilmember Taylor said the main issue why this zoning Council Rc:gular tite�ting: 0�-1�4-?009 i'age G of 14 Approvcd b}� Coimcil: DRAFT was brought back to the Planning Commission was an effort to try to resolve this issue when the UDC (Uaifortn Development Code) was adopted and from the recommendation of someone outside staff and outside the organization, without knowing the history of what l�as gone on with the landowners in this area, for Council to automatically bring this forward as a viable option without doing a considerable amount of analysis is premature; and added that what Council is considering, is to place a tangible restriction upon people which will be a hardship, that water utilities will also have di�culty meeting its growth and revenue projections due to this restrictioa; and that this restriction is being put in place to mitigate a potential threat, which Counciimember Taylor said he feels is e� small given the zoning in the area, and said he does not see Felts Field closing because of noise complaints. Deputy Mayor Denenny said then this was originally brought up, he was concerned about the area east of runway 2-1 and that he had asked what was the information pertaining to the extension of Felts Field, and given the extension, that there is a compromise here tonight that addresses the concerns of the long-term long-range slow encroachment upon the airport; and said he wants to stop elements that may be there 20 years from now which start to "push the envelope" on that airport and make it so it is�'t as viable as it is now; and given the information pertaining to the 500' extension, he asked Mr. Sealock the status of that extension and the background pertaining to it. Mr. Sealock explained that the plans for the extension are reflected on the Airport Layout Plan for Felts Field, there is no financing available for that at the present; it is not a"shovel-ready" project and would have to be fully funded and vetted and said they are not altowed to divert funds from other locations such as the International Airport to accommodate those changes; that those changes have been on the books for a long time. Deputy Mayor Denenny asked if that would be something to come before the citizens of the City of Spokane Valley, City of Spokane, and Spokane County to gain their input, and Mr. Sealock confirmed and e�plained that through the SEPA process, the public would have opportunities for cc�mment. Councilmember Taylor mentioned that if we start bringing in a significant amount of jet traf�ic into Felts Field, then it will not matter whether this ordinance passes or not, but there will be more complaints from the existing residenis; and we have a large amount of people living within Millwood and Spokane County, and Spokane and widlin Spokane Valley that surrnund this airport, and we don't hear complaints today; and rhetorically asked if 200 additional homes will be the "straw that breaks the camel's back;" and said he highly doubts that. Councilmember Dempsey said if you multiply tlie 200 homes by tl�e people living in those homes, there could be an additional 500 people to put into a small area; and she added that she realizes the decision to be made tonight is an extremely dif�icult one. Councilmember Gothmann said if he wece to ask who in this room has the most experience of keeping airports, the answer would be WSDOT; that it is WSDOT which has the experience of keeping airports and preventing them from going away; therefore Councilmember Gothmann said he would listen closely to what they say; th��c he also �oticed in option 2, he totaled 81% of the parcels will be developed according to option 2 compared with 100% of the original 4; and if that SSO' runway extension occurs, the aircraft would have to fly 35 feet lower at a slope of 3.5° then the present guide slopes, which gives more noise next to people's homes; and said that presently on the north side of the runway, the traffic pattem goes over Fancher Hill whic:h rises significantly so it would end up that those planes would be only a few hundred feet below the tra�c pattern, as Fancher Hill is 700` high and the traffic pattern is 1,000' and the homes are approximately 300' under tl�em, and it is l�is understanding that there are noise complain�� now. Mayor Munson remarked that future councils will alv��ays have t}�e opportunity to change t�lese regulations based on tvhat is occw at the time; and to try to guess what might occur in the future would be di�cult; and said for tUe small percentage who will not benefit from this, it has a greater benefit on them then on the ones who will benefit, which is his concern; however, he said he will reluctantly vote for the motion as be feels it is the best compromise at the present; and it can be changed whenever the need is demonstrated; and said he hopes Council �ti•ill ask at a future meeting t� recommend a zonin� Council Regular Meetin�: 0-1-1 �3-?0(19 f'a�e ? �f 1•� Approved by Co�incil: DRA FT change to the Planning Commission; and lie cornmended the public for providing input so that Gouncil -- can take the action necessary. Councilmember Taylor said he would like to make an amendment to this, and said he believes there is a need to make those people who(e who have the sewer and water stubs to their areas in the 6a zone; which is the least Council can do so as not to take away people's investment in that 6a zone; and re-stated the amendment is to allow the :�iderlying land use designatiorr for lhose lots that have had sewer or watc.�r s�ubbed 1». Councilmember Wilhite asked if Councilmember Taylor would include in the amendment, that sewer and water was to have been established prior to 2-28-06 in order not to encourage people to rush out and get sewer and water in so they can develop the area, but those people who have already made the investment should be permitted. Councilmember Taylor said it would be as of today; with Councilmember Wilhite countering that the date was the date originalty brought up by staff concerning when the sewer and water was hooked up. Attorney Connelly said to clarify, that it sounds that the proposed amendment is that exceplion A: the site had sewer arrd water stubs installed for ficlure developmerrt prior to the adoption of the city of Spokrnre's initial airport haurrd overlay regulalions on Z- 28-06 be added as a criterra in tlre 6a area �rorth of Utah Averrue and East of Rutter Avenue; which �vould be adding a way in which properties could be subdivided in that area which under option 2 is currently precluded. Councilmember Taylor confirmed that is his proposed amendme�lt. Deputy Mayor Derrenny seconded that amefrdment. Councilmember Gothmann said he thought the difference in what was proposed by the state and what's being proposed by Councilmember Taylor, seems to be proposing the same thing that was proposed two weeks ago. Councilmember Taylor said no as there are several criteria under the original 1. City Attorney Connelly said it only allows exception A and does not allow exception B or exception C. Councilmember Gothmaan said he does not see the difference as the original proposal was to allow everyone who had a sewer stub to go ahead and develop it; and Councilmember Taylor said no that there were several criteria with "or" between those criteria; so one would not have to meet all tl�e criteria, but only one. Councilmember Gothmann asked what would happen if that area were re-zoned for mixed use; could those sewer stubs not be used in mixed use for other uses than residential? Gouncilmember Taylor said the answer is, we don't know because we need to do a study for that particular area to see if mixed use would be compatible with a primarily residential zone. Councilmember Gothmann said he does not see the difference; under the motion presented by Mr. T'immerman, 184 parcels could be subdivided and 42 could not; and under the amended parcel, 184 parcels coutd be subdivided in 6b and a2 in 6a; and Councilmember Taylor said he does now know how many parcels have the stubs in 6a, and for him the issue is not numbers but of the investment already made. Councilmember Gothmann said from looking at the map, he counted about 51 so his estimate of 42 isn't too far oflf Mayor Munson said it does not include the adjacent lots; and Mr. Connelly said the other criteria is the dependent relative subdivision; that the second criteria is adjacency, and the third criteria is an accessory dwelling unit; that it only includes sewer and water stubs in 6a and does not include the exception b consistent with adjacent property sizes, or exception c more than one residence is located on the property. Mayor Munson asked then, if it is correct to state there are a total of 42 parcels and ��e don't l:now how many of those only have water and sewer. Mr. Connelly said he has not done that count. Mr. Gothmann said he just counted and he got 51 and about 50 north of Rutter have dots in them, assuming tbat is the criteria. Mayor Munson then asked, of the tota142 parcels e�cisting in 6a, were those parcels that included all tlu criteria or just the sewer and water stubs. Planner Kendall said the number of parcels that have the potential of being fur�her divided have not been analyzed for any of the three criteria; they are only lots that are large enough under the underlying zone; so in R2, they're 20,000 square feet or greater, and in R4 they are 12,000 square feet or greater; and said that has nothing to do with the number of sewer or water stubs or parcels that have multiple lots; but it does show that there are about 42 on the north side of Utah and East Rutter that runs east/west; there are 42 lots that have beeri sewered, and two that have water; and the green triangle on the map shows the lots that have both water and sewer south, and it matches the numbers referred to, there are about 184 parcels to the south of L1tah Council Regular I�Tc:eting: 0�-14-2009 Page 8 of 14 Approved by Council: DRAFT - and East Rutter which have been sewered, and 10 have been stubbed for water. Ma}�or Munson invited public comments on the proposed amendment. Sharon Panther, PO Box 11355 Spokane Washington, 99211 said there has been more information just come out since they had an opportunity to speak, and said she is coafused; that her property is north or Rutter, one block south of the Spokane River, and she asked where does that area fit into any of the things discussed tonight, where there could be some mitigation; and added that in 2005 they did the sewer, water, electrical and gas. Mr. Connelly said the amendment before the Council would allow development of 6a if sewer or water stubs exist, which is being considered now; and Mayor Munson confirmed if there is no sewer and water in there now, it cannot be developed. Mayor Munson also invited Ms. Panther to contact staff fur any further clarification. The amended nrotion is to allow subdil►isions to occur in 6a pursuant to criteria A, either water or sewer stubs or both. vote to anrend the nrotion.• Deputy Mayor Denenny, and Councilrnembers Taylar, Schlmmels, and Wilhite. Opposed.• Mayor Murrsort and Councilmembers Gothmann and Dempsey. Motion to amend passed. Vote on the amended motion to adopt ordirra»ce 09-�OS with Option 2 WSDOT, to allow subdivisiorts to o�cur in 6a pursuant to Criteria A, either water or sewer stubs or both, rnrd 6b pursua�rt to the options. fn Favor: Unanimous. Op�osed.• None. Abstentions: rrone. Motion carried. Councilmember Gothmann said he would like to see if there is Council consensus to have the Planning Commission look at the area north of Rutter for the possibility of making it mixed use; and Mayor Munson said he thinks that can be handled at the next study session. Mayor Munson called for a recess at 7:50 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 8:00 p.m. 4. Second Readin� Proposed Ordinance 09-007 Havana Street Bridge Project — Mike Connellv After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Councilmember Tuylur uml seconded to adopt Ordinance 09-007 providing for tl�e acquisition by eminent domain of certcrin lancl.s necessary in connectiort with the Havana Street Bridge Project. City Attorney Connelly explained that this ordinance is a beginning point of any eminent domain or condemnation action; it makes two legal determinations: that the use is for a public use, and the fact that it is being used for public right-of-way resolves that issue legally; and that it is necessary for the particular praject in question, and the engineering plans that have been submitted from a legal perspective, fulfill that requiremeni that this is reasonably necessary as part of the bridging the valley project and the bridge over the Havana tracks. Mr. Connelly expIained that the law requires that the property owner be made whole; and the statute ensures either by negotiation and settlement or by a verdict &om the court, that the property owner be made ��vhole; and the law sets forth specific criteria of when offers are to be made, the legal consequence of those offers, and when responses or settlement is to occur and those legal consequences; and one of the ways the property owner can be made whole is for a determination to be made either by negotiation or court verdict that the take is a total take due to the impairment of access or the usability of the remaining portion of land after the take occurs; the City of Spokane has indicated that the possibility of a total take is something thai is being considered, but that there has been no offer made in part because they are not to that point in the process as the appraisals are not yet complete. Attorney Connelly furtber explained this is a unique situation as this City considers permitting the process, th�n the City of Spokane goes through the process with the property owner; that the City of Spokane Valley is not paying any money for this property and is not incurring any risk or liability, as pursuant to the interlocal agreement, all the risk and liability will be handled by the City of Spokane. Councilmember Gothmann asked why pursue the land in this manner instead of making an offer first; and Attorney Connelly said the reason we are at the point �ve are now, is because of the timing of the project and the funding of the project, requires a finding of public use and necessity relatively quickly; and that needs to be done prior to the process to actually determine what the compensation will be pursuant to the statutory process. Councilmember Gothmann said that the map shows a 50' corridor, and there are rumors there will be an additional 30' beyond that; and he asked for confirmation of that rumor. Mr. Connelly said the ordinance being passed tonight is only for that portion identified on t}�e map, a 50' piece at the top narrowing do�vr� to a 10' strip alon� Havana; and if Counci! Regular Meeting: 04-14-2009 Page 9 of 14 Approvcd by Council: DR�iFT there are any additional properties required to be proposed being taken by condemnation other than by agreement, they would have to come back to this council to amend the ordinance; and Mr. Connelly stressed that the only authority council is granting with tonight's ordinance is for the property set forth on the map. Councilmember Wilhife asked for clarification as she said she thought it was the �0' plus the 10' for a total of 60'. Mr. Connelty said he feels the area is �vhat is set forth in yellow on the maps provided, and he said the Spokane project sta.ff �vill address that; and said that the ordinance should be passed prior to the interlocal as the one alludes to the other and we would not want to give the City of Spokane the authority to move ahead without first making the pracess legal through the ordinance. James Richman. Citv of Spokane City Attornev's Office: Mr. Richman explained that at the last meeting this Council had two requests: one for drawings of the project, which were provided electronically mid- week; and t6e second was more deta.iled explanation for the need for this bridge; and said Mr. Glenn Miles, SRTC Director is here tonight to explain the project. Mr. Richman mentioned that Spokane City staff tonight includes Mr. David Steele, City's Rea) Estate Manager; John Mercer, and Steve Hanson Project Engineer. Mr. Richman said there has been an of�er made to the properiy owner some time ago, perhaps even a few years ago which was made when another agency was handling the acquisition efforts; and said more recently the acquisitioa offer has come in-house with the City's real estate agents who have been working with Mr. Hite; and there will be additional work o� evaluating how the project is impacting Mr. Hite's property and they will review and re-consider the offer previously made; and he repeated that it is his understanding that an offer has been made; and he said they are going to do their best to treat Mr. Hite right in this matter; and it also appears that 10' is needed on the southern portion for right-of-way purposes, and toward the north end of the property, it extends to 50' according to the drawing, and they will use that area for drainage, and next to that for the length of the property they are acquiring, is a another ten-foot strip they'll need while the project is under construction as a temporary easement for a one or n�vo-year period; and one the project is complete, tl�at easement would terminate. Glenri Miles, Mana e�Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRT�C�: Mr. tililes distributed copies of information and explained his handout: "Havana Street Overpass — Executive Summary;" aad added that Havana tracks are closed on an average of 16 hours a day; and there can be 60 to 120 trains a day in that location, including a Iot of switching activity, and there are some trains which operate remotely all making for a dangerous location; and said most people know not to use Havana. Mr. Miles said there are approximately 1900 cars daily on Havana; and the tra�ic study indicates that if Havana were put in as an overpass over those tracks from Broadway to Trent, the tr�c on Havana could go up to about 19,U00 �ars daily. As an interesting note, Mr. Miles said that if Bridging the Valley did not occur, today on the BNSF cocridor there is approximately 192,690 annual vehicle hours of delay in that location; and by 2030 that could go up to 467,000 hours of annual delay; and by building these great separations, it goes to no delay. On Havana, he explained, the current delay is appro�cimatety 11,000 hours of annual delay even with the 1900 vehicles moving on a daily basis; and if the separation is not built, that number will go up to approximately 22,000 vehicle hours; compared with Park of about 37,000 hours of delay today and if there is no Park separation, there will be about 80,000 vehicle hours of delay at Park; so this creates a safzr environment for those travelling, creates an opportunity for new routes to go from the City of Spokane Valley to other points in the region, and it reduces the emissions that occur from all those vehicle hours of travel. Mayor Munson asked about the accident rate of cars colliding with trains; and Mr. Miles said that most of the trains in the Havana area move very slowly; but in Park and Pines where the speeds pick up, ihere have been a number of hits and fatalities at those locations. Council discussion included mention by several Councilmembers that they visited the site in question; mention by Mr. Richman that the area is being re-appraised; mention by Deputy Mayor Denenny that he would like assurances that by granting this authority that negotiations will continue; mention by Mr. Connelly that there is no legal bonding contract we could impose on an ordinance as the negotiation ha� not occurred yet, and the assurance that the property owner wil) be made whole is in the statutes, which Councii Regular tileeting: 0�3-1 �3-2C�U9 P�e 1 Q of 1� Approvcd by Council: nx,� rT set forth penaIties for not being realistic in offers to properiy owners; that we car►not build assurances i�to our ordinance but his experience is the statute works in the favor of the property owner; and the City of Spokane is proposing to do it exactly as dictated by statute; mention by Councilmember Dem�sey that there is a different between experts who can evaluate Mr. I-�ite's property and someone who has the expertise to move that type of equipment in and out of his business; question by Councilmember Schimmels about the process of making an offer then doing the taking after the fact, with response by Mr. Richman that typically the area is appraised, then an offer made, and he said negotiations could take a variety of directions, and that this ordinance doesn't mean the negotiations will end. Mayor Munson invited public comment. Gary Hite, owner of Hite Crane & Riggin�, 4323 E Broadwav, 99212: said he appreciatcs the time and said it is gratifying seeing the councilmembers visiting the property to get a better feel of the issue as it is diff'icult from looking at the map to tell what the plan is; he said it is very confusing; that he has not received an offer or information regarding any appraisal and that there has �ot been an appraiser on site until [ast Friday, which came following tlie last Council meeting; he said he understands the purpose is to move forward when all other recourses have been used and that this is the last recourse; that negotiation is first and to him, that includes discussing price and value and said one has to know what can be spent before making an offer on any kind of property to move it; that his biggest concern is that he hears it can go to court to get this resolved, but he doesn't have that kind of time as he understands it would take a year or two in court, including attorney's fees and that after all that, he would be broke; he said the government finds ways to pay their attorneys, but once he's broke, there is no way to make him whole; and said he can't spend all his time on something that should have been negotiated prior to this; he further explained that bridging the valley is a viable program and he agrees with the overall program; and said there are tr�c issues with Park, Pines and further east and he feels it would make a significant different there; but with Havana, he feels it got tacked on at the end because there's funding available. Mr. Hite further explained that there is no plan for egress or ingress beyoad the bridge; and if you got past the trains, you couldn't get onto Trent today; and south to Havana you can't access the freeway, and he had photos showing the shop access, parking and what would be lost due to this process. Mr. Hite said there is no question about him staying; but the question is whether there would be further negotiation to acquire the pmperty around him, or to completely move him — none of which has been o�'ered; he said as a legal obligation and to make anyone whole, he feels the City needs to show the need and to show the affect on the surrounding people, and said that has not been shown; he said this will shut him down and he won't be able to operate; and said the proper and good faith negotiation needs to take place prior to the exercise of eminent domain which has not taken ptace. He said he has a copy of the minutes of the last meeting; and he thought council decided there was not adequate proof shown that this process was necessary; regarding the ordinance, be said concerning the fourth "whereas" that they haven't made any compensation or made any offer of compensation, and pointed out the clause about the city representing that it negotiated in good faith but the parties are unable to agree upon the purchase price — he said no purchase price has been offered; and he asked Council to request the City to provide a�ood faith offer t�� represent that it has negotiated in good faith prior to Council adopting this ordinancc. City Attorney Connelly said Council aeeds to keep in mind that we are not taking his property toni�ht; and we are not granting possession or the authority for anyone else to move to his property; but this is declaring there is a public purpose for the property and that it is necessary to accomplish the public purpose; and that the law states that before they can tal.e or acquire possession, there has to be payment of the value of the property; and said we are not there yet; that there has been testimony on both sides and the City of Spokane represented their process, and Mr. Hite disagrees with how much good faith negotiations has occurred; and he explained that the pictures are part of the negotiations for value that wiil occur down the road; and this ordinance simply starts the process, and the issue cannot move until this body declares the public use and necessity; and said there is no taking until I�1r. Hite agrees with an offer or a court mak�s that determination. Council Regutar Meeting: 04-1=�-2009 Page 11 of 14 Approved by Council: DRA FT After brief discussion about the aforementioned "wliereas" clause, and suggestion by Councilmember Schirnmels that it be removed; it was moved by Councilmember Gothmann rnrd secorrded to strike the recital: "Whereas the City of Spokane has represenled that i� has negotiated in good faith for the acquisition of the property identifred in Exhibit A, but the parties are unable to agree upon the purchase price. " Point of order motion: It was moved by Councilinember Taylor, seca�ded and unanimoutily passea� to extend the meeting to 9:45 p.m. Mayor Munson invited public comment on the amendment. Mr. Hite: said he is in Spokane Valley and if we pass this, it will allow the City of Spokane to take him to court for the part of his property named here only, but it will make all his property unusable; and he asked what would preclude the City of Spokane from initiating a total take. Citv Attorne,y Connellx said it does not preclude the City of Spokane from a total take, that it declares it public and necessary and begins the process of eminent domain; that the City of Spokane could negotiate for wl�atever the parties deern appropriate. Brenda Grassel, 14I8 N Woodruff Road: she said that Mr. Hite's company moved their equipment three years ago and she is in support of him; she feels as a business owner they can't fight with the City of Spokane; and said the last four years have not shown him fair representation, and he doesn't have the time to be defending an issue in court when dea(ing with a government entity; and she asked Council to vote against this ordinance. The vote by acclamatio�i was una»imously in favor to amend the motion to strike the recital "Whereas the City of Spokarre has represented that it has negotiated in good faith for the acquisitian of the praperry i��entified in Exhibit A, but the parties are �uzc�hl� �o agree r�pon the pru•chuse prire. " There �vere nu further public comments. Vote on the amended motion to adopt (7rdi�raf7ce 09-007�rovidirrg for tlte acqa�isitio�t by e�rrirlent clomain of certain Icmds necessary in con�rectiort with the Havcma Street Bridge Project, and to delete the aforementioned "whereas " recital: In Favor: Mayor Munson, Deputy Mayor Denenny, arid C"ouncilmembers Schimmels, Taylor, cmd Gothnrcmn. Opposed.• Councilmenrber.s Wilhite and Dempsel�. Abstentions: None. Motion carriec� Mayor Munson called for a recess at 9:15 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 9:22 p.m. 5. First ReadinE Pro�sed Ordinance 09-008 Amending Comp Plan — Mike Basinger After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was nroved by Councilntember "1'a}�lor C7I1CI seconded to advance Ordr�rance 09-008 to a second readin� After Mr. Basinger's PowerPoint presentation, there were no council objectians to any of the proposed amendments. Councilmember Taylar asked about annexation policies and where does this put us in terms of future acquisition areas; and Mr. Connelly said these changes would allow us to proceed with annexation tivith UGA's. There was mention of a typographical error on page 1 l, concerning CPA 06-09, the date should be 12/OS/08 instead of 12I05/09. Councilmember Taylor meationed the community survey taken in 2004, and if there were any updates to that; with Mr. Basinger responding he would argue we would need another survey. Mayor Munson invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclanration: In F�.�or: Uncmimous. Opposed.• none. Abstentiats: �rone. �tlotio» carrie�l 6. First ReadinQ Proposed Ordinance 09-009 Amending Zoning Map — Mike Basin�er After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Councilmember i�ilhite a�id seconded to advance Ordinance 09-009 to a second reading. Mr. Basinger said this ordinance amends the map by taking the land use designation amendments and putting them into the zoning map. Mayor Munson invited public comment; no comments tivere offered. Councilmember VVilhite called the question; Council Re�ular?�ieeting: U�i-l-�-20t)9 Page 12 of 14 Ap}�roved by Council: DIUi FT with a unanimous vote in favor of calliog the question. Vote by Acclamation vn the motion to advance 1he ordinance to a second reading • In Favor: tlnQni�rrou.s. dpposed.• 1Vo�te. Abste�rtiorts: None. Motion carriecl. 7. First Readin� Proposed Ordinance �9-010 Batch Code Amendments — Christina Janssen After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Councilmember Taylor cuid seco�:ded to advarrce Ordinartce 09-OIO to a second reading. There was no Council objections to any of the proposed amendments. Mayor Munson invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed.• No�re. Abstentions: None. Motio�i carried 8. First Readin Proposed Ordinance 09-011 Amending SVMC 3.55 — Ken Thompson After City CIerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Councilmember Tcr}�lor und seconded to suspend the rules and adopt Ordinance 09-011. Finance Director Thompson explained that this is to amend which staff and members of Council can transact city business with our banks as the last ordinance was passed in 2003 and the names need to be updated; and said there were some changes in tlle legislation recently so the resolution will be brought back at a later date. Ma�ror Munso� invited publ ic. comment; no comments were offered. Vote by .Acclamatiorr: In Fuvor.• Unanimous. Opposed.� Norn-. Abstentiorrs: None. Motion carried. 9. Proposed Resolution 09-004 Amendin� 2009 Transportation Improvement Plan — Neil Kersten/Steve Worle It was moved by Cot�rcilmember Taylor c�nd seco�ided to approue Resolutiori 09-D0� for ,4mendme�rt #2 of the 2009 77P as presented by sfaff. Public Works Director Kersten explained that there was nothing new to add to the presentation given during tonight's public hearing, and he mentioned which projects are part of the stimulus package. Mayor Munson invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vorc� by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed.• None. Absterrtions: None. Motion carried. removed from the agenda. l 1. Motion Consideration: Interloc,al Agreement with Citv of Spokane regarding Havana Brid�,e — Mike Connellv It was moved by Cotmcilmember Taylvr u�7d seconded to outhorize the City 1ti1a�7crger or designee to execute the interlocal agreement as drafted City Attorney Connelly explained that the agteement takes us out of the control position and we will not be able to negotiate or approve any settlement or incur any liability. Mayor Munson invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: I,i Favor: Mayor Mimson, Deputy Mayor Denenny, cmd Councilmembers Schimmels, 'laylor cmd Goth,namr. Opposed.• Councilmembers Wilhite and Dempsey. Abstentions: None. Motiorr carried 12. Motion Consideration: Piaes PCC Intersection Bid Award — Neil Kersten It was moved by Cotorcilmember Tcrylor arrd seconded to award the Sprague/Pines PCCP h7tersectiar Project contract to the lowest responsible bidder, Acme Concrete Paving, Irrc., in the amount ��f $634,428.25. Public Works Director Kersten explained that the bids were all good, that Acme was the lowest, and that they did the Bowdish intersection last year and did a great job, and that this is well under budget. Mayor Munson invited public comment; no comm�nts were offered. I��te hy ,-iccl Qlllc71t011: III Fwor.• U�tanintous. Oppvse�l: : ��QIlE?. . -�b .SIC'lll1011.S: .��Oile. . 'lfotiv�t c�tt•�•iec� PUBLIC CONIlI�NTS: iVlayor Munson invited general public comment; no comments «�ere offerecl. _ It was moved by Councilmember Taylor, seconded and u�tcmimously agreed to extend the meeting <<► 10: 00 p.m. Mayor Munson suggested and Council agreed to postpone agenda item � 13 City Finance 101, and agcnda item �1 > to another date; and he thanked I�1s. Beck for her patience Council Regv{ar Meeting� ()•l-1 •i-?l)()9 !'a:��e 13 ��f i a Approved by Council: DRAFT ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: 13. Citv Finance l Ol — Dave Mercier (item postponed to a later date) 14. 'I'ourism Promotion Area — Liz Beck Ms. Liz Beck, General Manager of Super 8, and Chair of the TPA (Tourism Promotion Area) Commission, mentioned the March 23, 2009 letter concerning increasing the TPA assessment fee on occupied hotel rooms, raising the fee to $2.00 county-wide; and also mentio�ed the February 26, 2009 letter from Toni Hansen, Executive Director of the Spokane HoteUMotel Association which explains that the membership formally and unanimously endorsed the motion made in November by the TPA Commissioners to increase the assessment as noted; that Ms. Beck said they have not received any negative discussion from any hotel partners; and said she feels the increase won't hurt her business at all. Regarding the status of an amended interlocal addressing this change, Ms. Beck said Jim Emacio has prepared the docume�t and a hearing is set before die Board of County Commissioners, and said she anticipated havi�g the document to Council perhaps by the end of the month. City Attorney Connelly asked for a copy of the interlocal prior to the Board of County Commissioners passing it; and Mr. Mercier added that our Council takes affirmative action before execution of a document, said he anticipates that no activn would be taken until after the public hearing and the Board of County Commissioners adopts their draft so there won't be multiple drafts. 15. Agenda Items for Tentative Spokane Citv/S�okane Valley Joint Meeting — Mavor Munson (item postponed to a later date) INFORMATION ONLY: The ICMA Assessmer�t Update, Spoktme Valley tlrts Council Sculpture Update, and Edward I3yrne Memoria! Justice Assistarrce Gra�rt (JAG) Agreement were for inforrrration o�tly a»d K�ere ��ot repor�ed or discrsssec� EXECUTIVE SESSION: Pendin� Litigation; Land Acquisition It tivus moved by M�ryor Munson, seconded and uncmimo:�sly agreed to adjourn into Executive Session for approximately 30 minutes to discuss pending litigation and latd acquisitiorr, and that »o action is anticipated 1lierea}'ter. Council adjourned into executive session at 9:50 p.m. At 10:21 p.m., Mayor Munson declared Council out of executive session. It was then moved by Councilmember Gnthmann, .secnnded and renrnrimor�sly agreed t� adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 10:22 p.m. ATTEST: Richard Munson, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, Cit�� Clerk Council Regular i��teeting: 0�3-14-2t10� Page 14 of 1=� Approved by Council: DRA FT MINUTES City of Spokane Valley City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, Apri128, 2009 Mayor Munson called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. and welcomed everyone to the 158th rneeting. Attendance: Citv Sta/'i: Rich Munson, Mayor Mike Jackson, Deputy City Manager Dick Denenny, Deputy Mayor Mike Connelly, City Attorney Rose Dempsey, Councilmember Scott Kuhta, Senior Planner Bil! Gothmann, Couneilmember Mike Stone, Parks & Recreation Director Gary Schimmels, Councilmember Ken Thompson, Finance Directc�r Steve Ta}�lor, Cou�cilmember Greg McCormick, Planning Manager Neil Kersten, Public Works Director Absenl: Diana Wilhite, Cotincilmember John Pietro, Administrative Anal}��t John Whitehead, Human Resour�cs tilana�er Lori Barlow, Associate Planner Deanna Gri�ith, Administrative Assistant Carolbelle Branch, Public Information Officer Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk INVOCATION: Pastor Matthew Larson of Good Shepherd Lutherai� Church ga��e tt�e in��ocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Munson led the Yledge of Allegiancc. ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called roll; all Counciirnembers were present except Councilmember Wilhite. It was moved by Councilmenrber Tcr��lor seco»ded artd tnta�tinrot�sly agr eed to excuse Councilmemh. er T3'illiite from ton�ght's rneetij�g. APPROVAI. OF AGFNDA: It �vas moi�er! by Couneilnrember Taylc�r, seconded and u�tanintously agreed to approve the uge�rda. INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS �ND PRESENTATIONS: n/a CONLIVIITTFE, BOARD, LIAISON SUMMARY _REPORTS: In the interest of tim�, tl�i� �tias nc�t addressed. Mavor's Report: Mayor Munson read the following Proclamations: Nlunicipal Clerk's V�'eek, Sil��er Star Banner Day, arid Worker's Memorial Day; and Deputy Mayor Denenny read a proclamation for Motorcycle Awareoess and Safety Month. Members of the Motorcycle Guild accepted their proclamation. GENERAL PtIBLIC CONIMEh'TS: �4-ta��r I��1linson invitcd �eneral public comments; no c��mrnent� «�ere offcred. 1. PUBLIC HEARING SARf' — Scott Kuhta Mayor Munson opened the public hearing at 6:1 � p.m. and e�plained that each person ��ill be allotted a maximum of five minutes to speah; and he asked citizens to conduct themselves in an orderly and respectful man�er; and added that deliberation on the Plan is teotatively scheduled for May 19. Senior Planner Kuhta �avc �i brief PowerPoini presentati�n explainino the project's �rigin, the ptannin� proc�s�, Counci! Meeti►rg Mint�t�.�s: 0-�-28-2U09 1'ag� 1 al i Approved by Courrcil: DR.-1 �T mentioned the various public hearin�s and dates of deliberation, mentioned the council's zone district changes and zone map changes, and other significant changes including those found in the Applicabilit}� Section, City Center regulations, Pre-located streets, landscaping, signage and Future Street Network. Mayvr Munson explained that Council would not be asking questions of the public other then clarification questions, said that the Council is here to listen; and reminded everyone that we will continue to receive written comments through 5:00 p.m. Friday, May 1. Mayor Munson asked City Clerk Bainbridge if she had any letters to read, she mentioned she did oot; and Mayor Munson then invited public testimony. 1. Jack Riley, Plantation Restaurant, Vista and Sprague: said he applauds Council for wanting to build a new city center, but with the current economy ar�d the State's huge deficit, he questioned how we would spend $40 million especially when faced with the need for a new wastewater treatment plant at an estimated $200 million; and he rhetorically asked which is rn�re imp�rtant: a cit}' centcr or flushin� toilets. 2. Art Britton, 18812 E Euclid: said he li��es next door to Gary Schimmels; he appreciated it when the road open to get through the valley; but said he doesn't kno�v where the money will come from; that we must have a wastewater treatment plant; that he has a problem with the numerous surveys for a cost of $2�5,000; and said the County said to keep some for light rail; that he has no use for it so let them built it; and said he would like to see some of the survey money go to the road fund instead of surver•s all tl�e time; and he mentioned his property ta.� valuation ��•ent up 64%. 3. I�ave Ochoa, 1 1616 F.1�'Iain A��enue: said his conc�rn is the cc�uplet; he s�id it ��c�rks, he likes it, and h� hasn't spoken to anyone who doesn't like it; said it will be expensive to change it to two-»-ay, and once the population grows, we will have to tear it up and make it one way again. 4. Terry Lynch, President, Spokane Valley Business Association, Board of Directors: read his written comments: that the Spokane Valley Business Association Board of Directors asked him to speak on their behalf; tliat a report produced by Gonz�ga Universit}� concludes that the property values, rental rates and businesses in general have suffered with the one-u�ay; that it is his Board's position that in changing back to a two-way, the injustice made to those businesses along that portion will finally be rectified; and ti�at after the County changed it, it became a one-way to Spokane, encouraging traffic to go directly to downtown; he said if, in his thirty-eight years as ov��ner-operator of the Park Lane Motel and RV Park, he had experienced a one-way going to Spokane from the Valley, his business would have failed; and said a two-way road is critical to small businesses; and that the SVBA believes the change to one way was a mistake; and he urged Council to move fonvard �vith the changing one-way on Sprague to a two-way route, tbus making it our Main Street once again. 5. Joe Jovanovich, General Manager of Walt's Mailing Ser said wz pledged allcgiacice to the �las� tonight, and he asked that Council thinl: about liberty and justice for all, and said this plan doesn't represent that and it made him disappointed in American to take away the future possibility of a land owner and give it away; that supporters of this plan are rushing into a mine field; and in reading from his written comments, said that "I predict that this attempt to drive unwanted, self aggrandizing development from the top down will meet the same fate as so much Soviet era planning ... miles of abandoned properties that once were viable, famity-owned, small town businesses." He said he pleads that Council not support the plan; or put the plan to a vote of the people. 6. Duke Vierth, 202 N McDonald: said he was informed this communily is $9 million in debt; doesn't l:now if it's true; but said he doesn't feel $40 million for a new community center is something �ve should do; said his street is beginning to fall apart and he has appealed to the City to please come out and oil the cracks in the street and he heard the City does not have the money, yet he said he saw AAA Street S�vee�er� sev eral tim<< hc slid ��e need to take carc of our roads and that he is bzginnit�g t�� fc�l this Counci! Meeting t4linutes: 0-i-2b'-24ti9 YuKe.� ? c�j i ,4pproveaf bi�� Courrcil: DRAFT Council is taking direction from the Governor of the State. Couocilmember Taylor responded that the City's debt is $0.7 million and the other debt is bonds for CenterPlace, which was paid for via voter approved sales tax at the same time the incorporation was approved. 7. Phillip Rudy, 5647 N Fruithill Road, and Chair of the Greater Spokane Valley Chamber: said he �vatched the efforis to thoroughly review the details of this plan; that the Chamber representatives attended many public meetings, and he commends Council for the diligence and attention to detail; and thtinked Council for listening to the public and making changes, that it demonstrates a diligence to constituents. He said the Chamber is also pleased the final street map has fewer pre-located streets which could affect property values; and when property is developed, a case could be made as long as it follows the criteria; he said the Chamber recommends a change for nonconforming use of a property: that now Spokane Valley Municipal Code Title 19.20.060 allows legal nonconforming uses and structures after becoming unoccupied for a maximum period of twelve consecutive months; and said for the plan boundaries, they recommend that be extended to thirty-six months to protect the interest of property owners on the corridor who are attempting to rent, or lease their facility; that twelve months is a specia] hardship on owners of single use businesses like restaurants. Dr. Ruby said he ��ill submit his personal cornments in «�ritings later hut these are the comments from 1hc Chari�be► 8. Mike King, 930U E Sprague: said he is a nicmber of tiie Ghamb�r �f C '��T�nierce anJ I3oard of Directors; that this is not a road issue, but is a twenty to thirty-year plan to revitalization the core of' Spokane Valley and create a city center, which will increase the tax base as it is eventually developed; it will create larger tax revenues; and the improvements will make this a more successful and workable plan; that the Chamber's Task Force helped to make this a successful plan, and for the most part, changes over time «�ill be slowly by the developer for the individual properties and not on tl�e citizens; that this Plan is a blueprint to follow and is a long term plan; and that the thirty-six months' relief is justified; he said the different Zoning is not a down zoning and it will signifcantly increase the property use and help the vacated lands; and he urged Council to vote on this. 9. Susan Scott, said she is the a�vner of one of the properties that �vill be euthanized by the down zoning; and said when that happens in the name of revitalization, she asked how many business uses will be nonconforming by this plan; that the Pian has an economic impact; that she was told people can alway� make a request for a zone change: after hiring an attorney, and going through the detailed and burdensome process along with the $850 fees and hearings, on the chance the current zoning will be restored; she said this is not consistent with the comp plan and this isn't how property rights are protected when the fox is in charge of the henhouse; she said people are afraid to speak up about changes; she has seen overzealous code enforcement; and subjective direction given to the Community Development Director which will make the plan worse; that the process has contradictory statements and is inconsistent ��•ith rublic comments; and she said tu scrap the �lan, cut the lusses, and continuc ��ith the comp plan. 10. Jim Giles, 719 S McKinnon Road: said �vhen the road was first changed to one ��ray one person on a motorcycle was killed; and two years after it �vas changed, a person going the wrong way was injurecl; said he didn't think it was a good idea before but now switching it back wiil cause some of those problems again; and one-way on one part and two-way on others will be a lot of confusion. 1 l. Dean Grafos, 16120 E Sprague, and owner of property at 15813 E Sprague Avenue, said in readin� l�is written comments, that this letter is follow up to a letter written on his behalf by land use attorneti� Stacy Bjordahl; said they are opposed to the implementation of the plan; that it is harmful to most of lhe property owners i� the corridor while enriching a small, select, special interest few; that for his properties it violates the GMA and is an arbitrar}� and discriminatory action as it is down zoning and will create hundreds of non-conforming businesses along the corridor and is an action that should not be taker� lightly by res�onsible local officiats; the existing businesses will become non-conforming makin�► Cotnlci! Aleetin� Alinz�t�:s: 0-� I'cr�� 3 of i Approved by� Council: DRA FT rcfinancing, borrowing or selling the property� difficult; and said one of the goals of the G:�4A is and should be the protection of individual property rights. 12. Sean Lumsden, 910 W Garland: said he represents the Auto Row Dealers; he submitted a letter about a week ago with a few requests; he wants a change in the size of the gateway commercial district in one specific area; said all new car franchises are beholding to their parent franchise requirements concerning how buildings look; that perhaps there could be a permit process so franchisees can say the changes are coming from the parent company; and he said he would make a bold prediction and guesses that people don't �vant to pay more property taxes; he asked how we are going to fund city hall or further programs like the wastewater treamlent plant; and he submitted it would be funded with property taxes or retail sales tax, and said that auto row has the opportunity to draw people from all over the region; that as people make their second largest purchase, they would leave us their retail sales tax; that the plan can be funded through retail sales t.�x by maximizing the opportunities of the auto dealers which will benefit all businesses; and said we need to plant a field before building a barn; and we will have an opportunity to fill the city coffers to fund whatever might need to be funded, further down the road. 13. Julie Lehman, 12605 E 4`�': said she is against the plan and feels we should not go forwaru without voter approval; that elected officials are representatives of constituents and are not in office to put forward their own ideas and weren't elected as paternalistic decision makers; that Gouncil's duty is to do what the citizens want is best and they cannot know that without bringing this to a vote; that the Plan incorporatcs such vast changes to affect so many's property rights that it needs to be brought forward to the people. 14. Mary Pollard, 17216 E Baldwin: said she is speaking for the Nord� Greenacres Neighborhood; that she believes this is a bad policy especially in these economic times; that GMA is not an open mandate to recreate the business district and the life of the citizens but is concerned about job pratection and il is about the citizen's taxes; that she hasn't found anyone in her community who thought this was a good idea and auto row and onl}� a few others will benefit from this plan; that this is "nothing short of' environmental psychosis ... and would be violating Anti-Trust laws .. and the Sherman Act." She advised not e�tending Appleway beyond the University area; slie said to keep several lanes from Evergreen to Sullivan as reducing tra�ic lanes will create failed traffic at intersectio�s; that we can't create more easVwest roads due to the topographic limitations of the valley; during I-90 construction or accidents, traffic �vill need these alternative roads; that Pines and Sullivan are "pretty much failed" and she said she can't image getting rid of two more lanes of traffic; that there is a severe economic downtown now and it will create a tax revenue deficit; that you can't ask people to change their business; they can't sell it and they won't benefit from other uses; she mentioned that the Valley Mall filed bankruptcy; and in 2004 people �veren't really paying attention to the new city but people weren't sho�vn other choices; a�d she said Council needs to respect people's dreams. 15. Karla Kaley, said she o��vns a property management company here; that she loves the Pacific Northwest and loves the area; she invested her life's worth in real estate in Spokane Valley because of what it promised to offer in serving so many communities; but said she has grave concems about changing from the multiple lane single direction as it is now a nicely designed thoroughfare which serves many of the needs of the downtown area; and said if we increase traffic congestion the communities we serve will find other easier ways to do businesses, such as taking I-90; and if we make it more difficult for people to access us, it will facilitate them shopping off interstate interchanges; that she is against changing the traffic patterns; that it is important for cities to have identifi�s; a�d we need to make sure we represent ourselves well and look at who we serve. 1 b. Lynn Plaggemeier, 11708 E 19` said one of the reasons the citizens voted to become a city ��as that we weren't gettiog a fair shot and a fair vote from the county; that this issue should be brought to the voters and he asked where is the money coming from; he said if we are looking at an En��ironmental C'oui�rill�leeli�rg hlinule•.5: O-I-Z�S-2009 1'n�e -1 nf " t(ppr�i�ed hti' C'ou�rcil � DRA FT Impact Statement, that could go on for years; said he hasn't seen a SEPA checklist; }�et people feel this is a done deal; and he mentioned a sign for "Cit}� Hall" along the area of University, and asked if we have already bought that? Mayor Munson explained that the sign be described is just a directional sign. 17. Dan Geiger, 118 S Pines Road: said that this is a complex plan; that he read some of it but not all; said he bought his property about three years ago; it is commercial and has been zoned commercial since 1948 when it was built; but said that under this plan it would be downzoned to residential over time; a�d he said he realizes that as long as be keeps his business, there is no problem, but eventualty it will be downzoned; he said he's not sure it makes sense to have residential there, and he would like Council tc� consider that beforz mal;in` that change as it is a serious thing to do to sc�meone's propert}. l�. Jim Nelson, o�vns Leo's Photo�raph on Apple�vay and Farr: said ihe plan 1111�?aCtS Ililll and that returning to two, two-ways instead of the one way is a bad idea for safety and money reasons; he said lie feels we need to move traffic and to get to the city center area can only be done with good flowing roads; and said that half of his building is residential and half isn't and that he would like to see that streets are getting prettier, and mentioned he would also like to see sign regulations a little tighter. 19. Kathy Bonin 2803 S Bowdish Road: she stated that now is a bad time to move forward witt� something like this; that there are many people aut of work; the Valley Mall filed for bankruptcy; and it is not a good time to do this or raise taxes as people can't aflord it; and g�irig back into ri�� wa��s is a bad idea, and she su�gested �uttin4 it t�� the E�eople's ��ote. 20. Dean Davenport, 1��U E Lv�rett: said he doesn't unc�erstand tl�� reaso�� uf the couplct; with pcople going broke we don't need a new city hall; he suggested we just take out the curbing in front of Super Supplements and let the peQple go tbrough; to leave it the way it is and open the traffic going eastbounci and that will take care of the problem; he suggested we turn it back around and tFilce the curb out and turn the lights back around and paint the lines back the way they were. 21. Bob Blum, 12722 E 15�': said it appears d�ere are a lot of people doing some posturing about economic times and he asked Council to be cautious; that the road is now a quick way to get home; he likes travelling that way; he suggested having an updated traffic count to confirm which way the traffic moves; mentioned that when snow is piled up as it was last �vinter that we lose a lane; and again stated he �vould like to see Appleway stay the way it is now. 22. Kermit Anderson, 7108 E 2° stated that this plan is huge and he heard it could take twenty to thirt�� years; that it should be called re-zoning and not revitalization; that he has a business at the west end c�t' tliis plan next to the freeway and it doesn't fit the plan and is not the kind of business we want; but said l�e realizes it will probably be grandfathered in; but said if he wants to expand it will probably have to conform but he doesn't know what it would have to conform to, and he asked if people will be hanging in limbo for twenty to thirty years while this plan is being fulfilled; and he asked why we are doing this gigantic thing; said he's opposed to this plan and is pretty happy with the valley the way it was; that Sprague goes through a down period as seen in the past; and is iike Havana which is coming back; and said this will discourage and affect a lot of businesses who have been there; and said that people put a lot of money into their plans. 23. Nancy Nishimura, 1 S 103 E. �'alley V4'ay; said she owns Grr;r;n Thumb Nursery; that she is opposed to the �'lan as it currently is, and as explained in her written letter, she said it calls for businesses along Sprague to change their current configurations and relocate the buildings to the curb area with parking at the rear, the plan calls for the redirection of the business district, calls for rezoning commercial property, calls for rezoning business property from commercial to residential for the Appleway Couplet but does not actuallv own the land: and said that this cinr and this Plan really don't need or want her business or Council Meetingl�linutes: 0-1-?5-2009 �'�S� � �.1�� Approved by Council: DR9 FT her; that she made an effort to some�vl�at participate in government, but in the end felt like a fool paying taxes to this city; and said she will work hard to make sure this plan does not come into being as it curcently is; that it seems to be out of touch with the reality of this community; and having a city center is one thing, but redirecting the entire Sprague corridor is not feasible. 24. Tony Lazanis, E Empire Way: said we have wasted enough money on studies as the valley never will be what we are planning to do as we don't have the money; that he woutd like to see Sprague two ways again; it would help businesses and people. 25. Grant Rodkey, 11524 E 24`� Avenue: said this idealistic street plan is similar to the Riverstone Development in Coeur d'alene which is loosing its anchors as they're backing out; he said something t�� keep in mind is we like the view of the mountains; and we don't want to create a claustrophobic affect when drawing buildings close up to the road; that changing the road back will create congestion; and said he doesn't even drive on that; and said there should be a public vote on this issue as it affects the quantit�� of taxpayer's dollars and it will be the people who will bear the burden; that this is the least representative body and said Council doesn't seem to take into account what the majority want; that he hopes it will change over time and if not, there is a petition that may change that; and said that it is not easy to cross tr�c; said he hopes this will continue to be a representative body, but when Sue Scott calmly went through her presentation, asking her to sit down is an example of the censorship of her view and that tl�is is the kind of thing that leads to totalitarian thinking and he's opposed to that. 26. Jim Dempsey, 4518 S Bowdish Road: said he has an apartment building along the Appleway pruject; tt�ere is some possibility he'd want to change that and add some more units and apparently it fits in the plan; said he doesn't pay sales ta�►es so he won't contribute much to the $40 mitlion price tag; mentioned that Home Base went out of business ten years ago and it took nine years to find another to come in and use that; that we scnt $400,000 to see if this was a viable business corridor and it seems the market is speal:ing loud and clear that people want to build elsewhere; he said he is concerned the City might be involved in tal:ings in terms of guiding development and business money and said businesses a�1d developers go where they want and you can't force them or guide them to come if they don't want to; and said that the businesses on Sprague pre-date the city; he sees disincorporation signs around; so they'll likely be there longer then the city of Spokane Valley. Mayor Munson invited fucther public comment; no comments were of�ered and Mayor Munson clused tlle public hearing at 7:42 p.m. 2. CONSFNT AGENDA Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. ,A Councilmember may remove an item from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. a. Claim Vouchers: VOUCHER LIST DATE WNOUCHER NUMBERS: TOTAL AMOUNT 04/ 10/2009 17065 — 17092 $40,224.74 04/14/2009 17094 — 17132; 3022009; 406090008 $1,525,732.67 04/17/2009 17136 — 17169 $115,746.28 GRAND TOTAL �1,681,703.69 b. Payrall for pay period ending April 15, 2009: $264,012.57 c. Approval of Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Agreeme��t d. Approval of April 7, 2009 Study Session Meeting Minutes 1! was nroved by Cou�icilmember Taylor, seco�lded a»d immrinrot�sh� agree�f to approl�e the Cu�isc�rlt Agendcx. Counci! �feeting A-ti�iutc�s� U4-2�-?U09 f'�� j� % .9pproved bi� Council: DRA FT ADNiINISTRATIVE REPORT 3. Spra� e/Ap lp ewa,y Revitalization Plan - Councilmembers Mayor Munson mentioned the upcoming meetings where this Plan wilt be discussed and deliberated upon; and said the public will have further opportunity to comment when the ordinances for the plan are considered for adopiion, which is scheduled for later this summer, tentatively set for May 26; and said setting this for later May will give staf�time to put together all the comments made tonight as well as the written comments we might received through Frida}�; and said that tlle deliberation of this Plan is tentatively set for May l9. PUBLIC COMMENTS Mayor Munson invited general public comments; no comments were offered. INFORMATION ONLY: The Spokane Valley Fire first quarter report, and the various department reports were for information only and were not discussed or reported. Ea�CUTIVE SESSION: nla There being no further business, it i��as moved b}� C�imrilmenrber Tavlor, si�cnnded ajicl unrntimouslt� agreed to acijoz�rn. The meeting adjourned at 7:46 p.m. A7'I�EST: Richard Munson, '��1a��or Christine Bainbridge, Cit�� Cler�: Cou,rcil ,tIE�.�ri�i� Afi,r:�r�7s� r-,-'�4-?r)U9 Pl��t �' ��l � Appraved ht� C�crircil: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action �eeting Date: May 12, 2009 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business 0 new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report � pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 09-008, Comprehensive Plan Amendments (includes text and map amendments) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A (Growth Management Act) PREVtOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: �n April 14, 2009, Council deliberated on comprehensive plan amendments CPA-01-09 through CPA-08-09. BACKGROUND: The Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan includes an annual amendment cycle that runs from November 2 to November 1 of the following year. The Planning Commission considers applications received prior to the November 1 deadline in late winter/early spring of the following year, with a recommendation to City Council in late spring/early summer. All parts of the Comprehensive Plan (maps and text) can be amended during the annual cycle. The Community Development Department received one site-specific Comprehensive Plan map amendment; city staff initiated three site-specific Comprehensive Plan map amendments. Sites that are approved for a �;omprehensive Plan Map amendment automatically receive a zoning designation that is consistent with the �w Comprehensive Plan Map designation. Additionally, staff initiated Comprehensive Plan amendments to Chapter 2— Land Use; Chapter 3— Transportation; Chapter 4— Capital Facilities Plan 8� Public Service; and Chapter 8— Natural Environment. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PROPOSALS: Comprehensive plan amendment proposals are organized into individual reports consisting of application materials, staff reports, and letters submitted to date to assist the City Council's review. The Spokane Valley Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on March 12, 2009, to consider proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. After hearing public testimony, the Commission made recommendations on CPA-02-09 through CPA-04-09 and CPA-06-09 through CPA-08-09. Further research was requested on CPA-01-09 and CPA-05-09. On March 26, 2009, the Planning Commission held a hearing and made recommendations on CPA-01-09 and CPA-05-09. OPTIONS: Adopt Ordinance 09-008; remand to Planning Commission for further consideration; or conduct a public hearing on proposed deviations from the Planning Commission's recommendation. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS: Move to adopt Ordinance 09-008. STAFF CONTACT: Greg McCormick, AICP, Planning Division Manager; Mike Basinger, AICP, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Draft Ordinance Exhibit 2 Planning Commission Findings and Recommendation 1of1 i � i CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHIIr'GTON ORDINANCE NO. 09-008 AN URDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOI�:ANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE 06-010 ADOPTING THE CITY OF SPO�:ANE VALLEY COMPREHENSI�E, PLAN AND PROVIDING FOR 01fHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATING THERETO. V�HEREAS, through Spokane Valley Ordi.nance 06-010, the City of Spokane Valley adopted L�and Use plans and regulations as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan, Capital Facilities Plan, and Maps as the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Spokane Valley; and S, the Washington State Growth Nianagement - Act (GMA) allows comprehensive plans to be amended annually (RCW 36.70A130); and �,, �'VHEREAS, amendments to the City of Spokane Va�ley Compreheusive Plan may be initiated by the Plann.ing Commission (Comrnission), the City Council (Counc�l) or by the Community Development Director based on citizen requests or when changed conditions wanant adjustments; and ,. WHEREAS, the GMA requires comprehensive plans to be implemented with development regulations, including the zoning of property consistent with land use map designations; and ; ;�: � . �: ,. . VVHEREAS, consisterit w,�ith the GMA, City of Spokane Valley adopted Public Participation Guidelines to direct ��the public involvement process for adopting and amending � �, comprehensive plans; and ; '�' �;t�� - - � � �. WHEREAS, the Spokane Va11ey Municipal Code provides that amendment applications shall be received until November'l . of each year; and � , -�WHEREAS, appli�cations were� submitted by the applicant, owner or by City staff to amend the��' Comprehensive � Pl,an an� Zoning Map for the purpose of beneficially using the , , property described herein; and��:', i'� , WHEREAS; �following the application to the City, staf� conducted an environmental review to determine the potential environmental impacts from the proposed amend.ments; and :� WHEREAS, after reviewing the Environmental Checklists, staff issued Determinations of Nonsignificance (DNS) on December 19, 2008 for the proposals, published the DNS in the Valley News Herald on December 19, 20U8, and where appropriate posted the DNS on the sites and mailed the DNS to all affected public agencies; and , WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development was notified on Februaiy 27, 2009 pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106 providing a 60- day notice of intent to adopt amendments to the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan; and � Orrlin$nce 09-048 Comp Plan Amendments Page 1 of 6 WHEREAS, the Commission conducted a briefing on February 26, 2009, to review the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, notice of the Commission public hearing was published i.n the Valley News Herald on February 20, 2009; and W�-�REAS, on February 20, 2009, noti.ce of the Commission hearing was mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of the subject properkies ; and WHEREAS, notice of the hearing was posted on the subject property; and WHEREAS, the Commission conducted a public hearing on March 12, 2049 at which time the Commission received evideace, information, public :testimony ; and a staff report and recommendation; and - � � , , ;. r �;; WHEREAS, the Commission, at the conclusion of the public hearing and after.,� deliberating on the proposed amendments and information presented during the course of the hearing developed reeommendations on site-specific rnap atnendments CPA-02-09 through CPA-44-09. Further research was requested on site-specific map amend.ment CPA-01-09 and CPA-OS-09. The Commission made recommendations on teh~t amendments CPA-06-09 through CPA-08-09. The Commission requested minor changes to the Public/Quasi-Public provisions in CPA-OS-09. The Commission continued the.public hearing to March 26, 2009 for CPA-01-09 and CPA-OS-09; and : � WHEREAS, the Commission delibera�ed - on CPA-01-09 and CPA-OS-09 on March 26, 2009; the Commission r,ecom.mendecl approval o'f� amendment proposals; and V � � : W�-IEREAS, on March 31, 2009, Council reviewed the Commission's recommendations on the proposed Comprehensive:Plan �amendments; and Vi�'��REAS, on April 14,�2009, Council considered a first ordinance reading to adopt the proposed amendments; and . , ;' -. ; . , WHEREAS, on May ;� 2, 2009, Council considered a second ord.inance reading at which ti.me Council approved writ'ten findings of fact setting forth their basis for approval of the proposed amendments. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley do ordai.n as follows: � Section 1. �.s�. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend th� Comprehensive Plan adopted through Ordinance No. 06-�10. Section 2. indin s. The City Council acknowledges that the Comrnission conducted appropriate investigation and study, held a public hearing on the proposed amendments to the � Ordinance 09-008 Com� Plan Amendments Page 2 of 6 Comprehensive Plan aad approves the amendments to the Comprehensive Plan map and text. The City Council hereby adopts the Commi�sion's findings, specifically that: 1. Notice for the proposed amendments was placed in the Spokane Valley News Herald on February 20, 2009 and each site was posted with a"Notice of Public Hearing" sign, with a descripdon of the proposal. 2. Individual notice of the map amendment proposals was mailed to all property owners withi.n 400 feet of each effected site. 3. Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA — RCW 43.21 C) environmental checklists were required for each proposed comprehensive plan map and text amendmen� 4. Staff reviewed the environmental checkli.sts and a threshold deterinination was made for each comprehensive plan amendment request. Determinations of Non-si�nificance (DNS) w+ere issued for the requested comprehensive plan amendments on December 19, 2008. 5. The DNS's were published in the city's official newspaper on December 19, 2008 consistent with the Cifiy of Spokane Valley Envirovmental Ordinance. �. 6. The Spokane Valley Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on March 12, 2009, to consider the proposed amendments. After hearing;'public te�timony, the Commission made recommendations on CPA-02-09 through CPA-04=09 an CPA=06-09 through`CPA-08-09, excluding CPA-O l-09 and CPA-OS-09. ��, �, - 7. The Commission continued the public hearing for CPA-01=09,and CPA-OS-09 to March 26, 2009. 8. On March 26, 2009, the Commission made recommendations on CPA-01-09 and CPA-OS-09. 9. The planning goals of the Growth Nianagenlent '_Act (GMA) were considered an.d the proposed amendments are consistent with'thc GM�1. 10. The goals and policieS "of the Spokane Valley "Comprehensive Plan were considered and the proposed amendmerits are consistent with the ;Comprehensive Plan. 11. The proposed land ; use and ioning designations are consistent with the current use of the properties. � , ' 12. Find.ings were made and factors were considered to ensure compliance with approval criteria ! contained�in Section 17.80.140 H. (Comprehensive Plan amendment and area-wide rezones) of the�,Spokan� Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). I 13. The Gomprehensive Plan ,L�nd Use Map and text amendments will not adversely affect the public's general healt�l, safety, and �velfare. ,. ,. . �, Sectian 3: Pro �. The properties subject to this Ord.inance are described in , Attachment ��A:" � �. , ,. e don 4. �tComprehensive Plan A.�endments. Pursuant to RCW 35A.63.073 the City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Map as adopted through Ordinance No. 06-010, is hereby amended as set forth in Attachments "A" and "B". The Comprehensive Pl� Amendments are generally described as foUows: Map Amendments (Attachment A) File No. CPA-01-09: Application/Description of Proposal: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment to chaage the designation on parcels 45242.9032, 45242.9033, 45242.9035, 45242.9036, 45242.9050, 45242.9051, 45242.9056 and 45242.9057 from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential. Ordinance 09-008 Comp Plan Amendments Page 3 of 6 Applicant: Ben Goodmansen, Whipple Consulting Engiaeers; 2528 North Sullivan Road; Spokane � Valley, WA 99216 Amendment Location: Parcels 45242.9032, 45242.9033, 45242.9035, 45242.9036, 45242.9050, 45242.9051, 45242.9056 and 45242.9057; located oa the south side of 4`� Avenue botweea Sullivan Road ' and Conklin Road; fwther located in the south half of the northwest quarter of Section 24, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. Conncil Decision: Change Parcels 45242.9033, 45242.9035, 45242.9036, 45242.9050, 45242.9051, 45242.9056 and 45242.9057 to High Deasity Residential. Chang� Parce145242.9032 to Medium Density Residcntial. :.; .. File No. CPA Application/Descrlption of Propo�al: City initiated site specific Coinprehensive Plan map amendment on parcels 45242.1002 and �5242.1006 from High Density Residentia] (HDR) to Neighborhood Commercial (NC). � , : Appllcant: City of Spokane Valley, 1] 707 E Spra�ue Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendment Location: The northeast corner of 4 Avenue and Sullivan Road, parcels 45242.1002 and 45242.1006, addressed as 315 and 325 South Sullivan Roa'd; further located in the N�V'/a of the NW'/. of �,,:. Section 24, Township 2� North, Range 44 East, Willamette �Zeridian,,Spokane County, Washington. Counsel Decision: Change to Neighborhood Commercial (I\'C) . File No. CPA-03-09: Application/Description of Proposal: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment from Office (0) to Community Commercial (CC) on six (6) parcels composing approximately 3.5 acres of land. Applicant: City of Spokane Vall�y�, 11707 E Spra�ue A}��, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendment Location: The proposal is located betweeq Mullan Road and Argonne Road from the north side of Boone Avenue to the south side of Sinto Avenue; specif cally located in the SE'/� of Section 17, Township 25 North, Range 44, East VVillamette Nieridian, Spok�r►e Valley, Washington Council Decision: Change to Community Com�mercial (C) File No. CPA-04-09 ' � Applicat�onlDescript'ro� of Proposal: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment to change from Community, Cornmercial (CC) to Lo�v Density� Residential (LDR) on approximately .47 acres of land. Applicant: � City of Spokane Valley, E Sprague Ave, Ste lOb, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendment Locadon: The,proposal is located on St Charles Road, approximately 780 feet north of Sprague A��enue on the oast side �of Progress Road; specifically located in the SE '/. of Section 14, Township 25 North, Range 44 Easf Willamette Meridian, Spokaae Valley, Washington. Council Decision:. Change to Low• Density Residential (LDR) ,..,,, ; i , :> ,'' File No. CPA-OS-09: ��';,`.. ` Application/De,gcrlptioii of Proposal: A City inidated text amendment to Chapter 2— Land Use. The amendment updates Table 2.1 with aew land quantity analysis iafonnation; updates/adds annexation goals, policies and text. The amendment also evaluates all properties designa.ted public/quasi-public and proposes aa appropriate land use designation and zone based on the predominant land use surrounding the property. Applicant: City of Spokane Valiey, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendment Locatlon: Text amendmenis to Chapter 2— Land Use will have city-wide implications. Amendments to Public/Quasi-Public properties are located throughout the city. Ordinance 09-008 Comp Plan Amendments Page 4 of 6 Council Dec�s�on: Adopt Teat amendments to Chapter 2— Land Use; eliminate the public/qnas� pablic land usc designation and change to land use designations consi�tent with surrounding designations. File No. CPA-06-09 ApplicationlDescription of Proposal: Text amendment to Chapter 3— Transportation: Add text for new biks classification; add new bike lanes that are complete or will be by the end of the construction season: - Montgomery from Woodruffto University - V�'ellesley from Evergreen to Progress - Mansfield from Montgomery to SR 27 � Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 9920b Amendment Location: Te�rt amendments to Chapter 3— Transportation v��ill have city-wide i.mplications. � � ,��: Conncil Decision: Adopt teat amendments to Chapter 3 Transportation. ,. , �_. ,�:. File No. CPA-U7-09 � Application/Description of Prnposal: Text amendment to Chapter��4 — Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and Public Services: Update the 6-year Transportation Impro'vement Plan ,(TIP); update Water Districts & Wellheads map; update Parks & Recreation map; update 6-y�ear Setiver map; add annexation area level of service language: Applicant: City of Spvkane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 105; Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendment Locat�on: Te�ct amendments to'Chapter 4— CFP & Public Services will have city-wide ;:, , _ implicatioas. �. �, . PC Recommendation: Adopt teat amend �to Cb�apter 4-- & Public Services. � �� i , �; � ' " ' �`ile No. CPA-08-09 - � �i..� �' � i�; Application/Descriptiou of Proposal: Text amendment to Chapter 8— Natural Environme�at: update ` Wetlands map; update,Fish & Wildlife Habitat map. �' Applieant: City of Spoka�e Valley, ] 1707 E Sprague Ave,� Ste 106, Spokane Valiey, WA g9206 : �, Amendment Location: Text �amendments to Chapter ,8 �= Natural Environment will have city-wide implications. . � PC Recommendation: Adopt teact,amendments to Chapter 8 Natural Environment. Comprebensive Plan Te�.t Amendments (Attachment B). Chapter 2 Land Use; Chapter 3 — Transportation� Chaptez 4=.f Capital �'acilities Plan & Public Services; and Chapter 8— Natural Environment.) � � � � ,� '�� :� ,,;,� . Section 5. ``�, ; Compiehensive Plan - Copies on Fi1e-Administrative Action. The ' Comprehensive Plan�'(�vith Maps) is maintained in the office of the City Clerk as well, as the City Department of Community Development. The City Manager or designee, following adoption of thi.s Ordinance, is auttiorized to modify the Comprehensive Plan in a manner consistent with this �rdinance. ection 6. Liabili . The express intent of the City of Spokane Valley is that the responsibility for compliance with the provisions of this ordinance shall rest with the permit applicant and their agents. This ordinance and its provisions are adopted with the express intent to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the general public and are not intended to protect any particular class of ind.ividuals or organ.izations. Ordinance 09-008 Comp Plan Amendments Page 5 of 6 e tion 7. Severabilitv. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance , shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such ' invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance. Section 8. �ffective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after publication of this Ordinance or a sumnaary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provided by law. �, � , PASSED by the City Council this day of Ma .20 9: :. �' Q .;, ;.,: �, � ��` T. � , ;: � � '�'-'�„� - Mayor, Richard Munson - µ'?�. �:� ;�;: , , rf ,.. ATTEST: � ,' ��; ` _ ; , E�;. ,• r�• ►• � � ;_,�.�� ,. .��,. •� . ,,r i, ..;,i.. `'ti�'v ��li'�. City Clerk, Christine Ba.inbridge �;��: ;�- �., :�: .� '='�.-;, ,. ��t� � �,�� :,� �� ,�, - Approved As To Form: � , � � " _ -;,;�,,� � �';'�'r ;�.., ' � '�''�`��":;�:: ; t- . , 1 ��; :��,, t;I^ � �,}• �`�:''� ` �C�'= Office of the City Attorney �'�. � �� . Date of Publication: - , ��~;s_ - ,.. , ;��,, � ;�, Effective Date: , :. ��, _;: •� .:�„ -�� , '� ��!;� `ii i '.� . �. . � . �;:, . , ��;�,�;; �!:';� ;�. - :��'��,\;_ `,:•:?r. � �-:. � 1 �iu �' f �,��ti. i '. ' ��'t� _ _ �'� � j'j• �J`;�;t`.,.� , `�:It;E�; �• }� ��,j ��I� :� , S't:� l `�t'" . , `. • � '`� � ' ��. `r � . �: �, ';.y;•r ��'i ' !�' • � , �i • . • Ordi.nance 09-008 Comp Plan Amendments Page 6 of 6 i � I . � � • � i I �11 I 1 1 ( d �\� �--� � ol�an� � V�lle � � 11707 E Spra�ue Ave Suite 10b • Spokane Valley WA 99106 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921,1008 ♦ cityhallOspokanevalley.org emoran um To: Mayor and City Councilors From: lan Robertson, Chair • Spokane Valley Planning Commissfon Date: April 14� 2009 Re: Plannii�g Commission Findings and Recommendation: CPA-01-09 through CPA•08-09 BACKGROUND The Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC 17.80.140) includes an annual amendment cycle that runs from November 2" to November 1 of the following year. Applications received prior to November 1 are considered by the Planning Commission in late spring af the following year, with a decision by City Council in late springlearly summer. Al( parts of the Comprehensive Plan can be amended during the annual cycle. The Community Development Department received one request for a site-specific Comprehensive Plan map amendment. The City initiated three siie-specific Comprehensive Plan map amendments and initiated a number of Comprehensive Plan text amendments. Sites that are approved for a Comprehensive Plan amendrnent wil! automatically receive a zoning designation that is consistent with the new land use designation. Text amendments are propased to Chapter 2— Land Use; Chapter 3— Transportation; Chapter 4— Capita! Facilities Plan & Public Service; and Chapter 8— Natural Environment. A majority of these amendments are relatively minor in nature and update or correct information. More substantive amendments are being recommended to Chapter 2— Land Use and Chapter 4— Capital Facilities Plan & Public Service. Amendments to these chapters add annexation goals and policies, and annexation area leve) of service language. The Spokane Valley Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on March 12, 2009, to consider the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use map and text. After hearing public testimony, the Commission made recommendations on CPA-02-09 through CPA-04-09 and CPA-06-09 through CPA-08- 09. The Commission continued the public hearing to March 26, 2009 to allow for further research on CPA-01- 09 and CPA-05-Q9 On March ?_6, 2009, the Planning Commission made recommendaiions on CPA-01-09 and CPA-05-09. The Planning Commission's findings an� recommendat�on on CPA-01-09 through CPA-08-09 are summarized below. FINDINGS 1. Notice for the proposeJ ar7�endme��ts was place� in the Spokane ValJey News Herald on February 20, 2009 and each site was posted with a°Notice of Public Hearing" sign, with a description of the proposal. 2. Individual nofice of the site-specific map amendment proposals were mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of each affected site. 1 cf 4 3. Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA — RCW 43.21 C) environmental checklists were required for each proposed comprehensive plan map and text amendment. 4. Staff reviewed the environmentai checkiists and a threshold determination was made for each comprehensive plan amendment. Determinations of Non-significance (DNS} were issued for the requested comprehensive plan amendments on December 19, Z008. 5. The DNS's were published in the city's official newspaper on December 19, 2008 consistent wi#h the City of Spokane Valley Environmental Ordinance. 6. The Spokane Valley Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on March 12, �009, to consider the proposed amendments. After hearing public testimony, the Commission made recommendations on CPA- 02-09 through CPA-04-09 and CPA-06-09 through CPA-08-09. Further research was requested on CPA- 01-09 and CPA-05-09. 7. The Commission continued the public hearing for CPA-01-09 and CPA-05-09 to March 26, 2009. On March 26, 2009, the Planning Commission made recommendations on CPA-01-09 and CPA-05-09. RECOMMENDATtON File No. CPA-01-09: Application/Descriptlon of Proposal: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment to change the designation on parcels 45242.9032, 4524Z.9033, 45242.9035, 45242.9036, 45242.9050, 45242.9051, 45242.9056 and 45242.9057 from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential with a corresponding zoning change from Single-family Residential District (R-3) to Multi-family High Density Residential District (MF-2). Applicants: Marie Olbricht; 15710 East 4�' Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 99037 Braok and Jody Kamp; 12110 East 10`� Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 89206 Joy Swenson; 15808 East 4`" Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 99037 Dennis Crapo; 15321 East Mission Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 99037 Christine Kimball; 15714 East 4�'' Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 99037 Amendment Location: Located on the south side of 4�' Avenue betweEn Sullivan Road and Conklin Road; further located in the south half of the northwest quarter of Section 24, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. PC Recommendation: Change parcels 45242.9050, 45242.9051, 45242.9036, 45242.9057, 45242.905fi� 45242.9035� and 45242.9033 to High Density Residential (HDR) and zone to Multifamlly High Density Residential District (MF-2) and change parcel 45242.9032 to Medium Density Residential (MDR) and zone to Multifamily Medium Density Residential District (MF-1) File No. CPA-02-09: ApplicationlDescription of Proposal: City initiated site specific Comprehensive Plan map amendment on parcels 45242.1002 and 45242.1006 from High Density Residential (HDR) to Neighborhood Commercial (NC); corresponding zoning map amendment from Mulii-family High Density Residenba! (MF-2) to Neighborhood Commercial (NC). Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendment Location: The northeast corner of 4` Avenue and Sullivan Road, parcels 45242.1002 and 45242.100G, addressed as 315 and 325 South Sul(ivan Road; further located in the NW %, of the NW'/4 of Section 24, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. PC Recommendation: Change to Neighborhood Cornmercial (NC) and zone to Neighborhood Commercial (NC) 2 of 4 File No. CPA-03-09: ApplicationlDescription of Proposal: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment from �ffice (0) to Community Commercial (CC); corresponding zoning map amendment from Office (0) to Community Commercial (C) on six (6) parceis composing approximately 3.5 acres of land. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendment Location: The proposal is located between Mu(lan Road and Argonne Road from the north side of Boone Avenue to the south side of Sinto Avenue; specifically located in the SE'/. of Section 17, Township 25 North, Range 44, East 1Nillamette Meridian, Spokane Valley, Washington PC Recommendation: Change to Community Commercial (C) and zone to Community Commercial (C) Fi1e No. CPA-04-09 ApplicationlDescription of Proposal: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment to change from Community Commercial (CC) to Low Density Residential (LDR); corresponding zoning map amendment from Community Commercial (C) to Single-family Residential Urban District (R-4) on approximately .47 acres of land. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendment Location: The proposal is located on St Charles Road, approximately 780 feet north of Sprague Avenue on the east side of Progress Road; specifically located in the SE % of Section 14 Township 25 North, Range 44 East Willarnette Meridian, Spokane Valley, Washington. PC Recommendation: Change to Low Density Residential (LDR) and zone to Single-family Residential Urban (R-4) File No. CPA-05-09: Application/Description of Proposal: A City initiated text amendment to Chapter 2- Land Use. The amendment updates Table 2.1 with new fand quantity analysis information; updates/adds annexation goals, policies, and text. The amendment also evaluates all prope�ties designated public/quasi-public and proposes an appropriate land use designation and zone based on the predominant land use surrounding the property. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendment Location: Text amendments to Chapter 2- Land Use will have citywide implications. Amendments to Public/Quasi-Public properties are located throughout the city. PC Recommendation: Adopt amendments to Chapter 2- Land Use as proposed by staff. File No. CPA-06-09 Application/Description of Proposal: Text amendment to Chapter 3- Transportation: Add text for new bike classification; add new bike lanes that are complete or will be by the end of the construction season - Montgomery from Woodruff to University - Wellesley from Evergreen to Progress - Nlansfield from Montgornery to SR 27 Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendment Location: Text amendments to Chapter 3- Transportation will have citywide implications. PC Recommendation: Adopt amendments to Chapter 3- Transportation as proposed by staff. File No. CPA-07-09 Application/Description of Proposal: Text amendment to Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and Public Services: Update the 6-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP); update Water Districts & Wellheads map; update Parks & Recreation map; update 6-year Sewer map; add annexation area level of senrice language: Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendment Location: Text amendments to Chapter 4- CFP 8� Public Se;vices v�fill have citywide implications. PC Recommendation: Adopt text amendments to Chapter 4- CFP & Public Services as proposed by staff. 3af4 File No. CPA-08-09 ApplicationlDescription of Proposal: Text amendment to Chapter 8— Naturai Environment: update Wetlands map; update Fish & Wildlife Habitat map. Appllcant; City of Spokane Valley� 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendment Location: Text amendments to Chapter 8— Nafural Environment will have citywide implications. PC Recommendation: Adopt amendments to Chapter 8— Natural Environment as proposed by staff. ADOPTION OF FINDINGS: The Planning Commission is required to adopt findings of fact (Sections 17.80.140 8� 17.80.150) when recommending changes to the comprehensive plan. Each staff report contains findings applicable to the pa�ticular request. At the conclusion of the hearing for the comprehensive amendments, the Planning Commission, by separate motion, adopted the findings of fact contained in the staff repo�ts for CPA-01-09 through CPA-08-09. Approved this 26"' day of Marct�, 2009 �--- lan Robertson, Chair C+ty of Spokane Valley Planning Commissian 4of4 ac men Exhibit l: Comprehensive P1an Map �`l'�:1�1' ,��' �� ' - �_ � T � � ` C�'oniniunit� t , � r'c�n r}ierci:�l , � st i I � % . j - c j 1 I'uh!ic' (�U:iS{-Pillllll' _ PUV�1l'.�QU351-I _- - - . _ •�., - - •„ ... . .. � I �+Neigtibo'rh_ood� . � : �- �'C�inin��i;i l fi �,--;!.��',�! n . d c� n � . � � .. '- 3 - • '�' U - � � Z �I � i� ti -- "; p ,e •r. � - - - - I � }ii�„f=. 0)rt��ii�� !{.�icl<•��ti;;i ( 3rd 7 r� , . i _ ;1lediwfi =' Densi' �� CPA -01-09 �- � , h� � `� :��-: Resideotial � -' U fii <<� :, th th �i`i '� �ti` �tii � �ciahliu►�}��,c��i —�� - — — — ', ! , � � \, � (-'omrnei•c•�:�1 � th �,a 3 . � _ L Z " .r� Sth St6 � G � u '' Z : f � 6tt� 6th Pablic/Quasi- p �� Public ? o �� 'ater , a I�ad �� Fh Central Public/QuasrPublic Vallev Senior High 1 �� Lo Deasity ResideAti�l Request: C6ange the Comprehensive Plan map designation from LDR CPA-01-49 to HDR on parcels 45242.9050, 2.9051, 2.9036, 2.9U57, 2.9056, Cit�� of Spokane VaUey 2.9033 and 2.9035 wit6 a subseqnent zoning of MF-2 and parcel Community Development Department 45242.9032 be changed from LDR to MDR designation with a subsequent zoning of MF-1. E�ibit 1: Comprehensive Plan Map "� l,ow I�en:ir� � 1 �� .� ium ens�ty � � . i ' � Rc�i�jerti:il f �` ke�icj�t�ti:ll --- � �� Y j - �. i; , '' E'i. � > � l � -' � fi(?1lI11111I�"� � ^ ' � i ' � � L Ullllllt'1"Cl:7! � � ''.. .. ._ .�— -� _ � * St?i" L't'_' �I�i.?�_L� `Fli.3"U. . . ..� .�.�e= H � ---- �`r'• . . _ - .� � . 1U' � �. . � �� . . � � 1 ---,-� - � - 1 __�_ � � � � -- -� � ; � , . f Corridor . 7ixed_L1se - - ---- f'Eii�;ic,'( iu::�i-I'��h1ir V � — i PublidQuasi-Yubiic . v; �� . _ � .. , =� � nd G . ; : : . . � : . a. n � - ,r� v � cpA-oz-o9 :��,�h �,►�t�� c _nc� , l�icdium E t u;•�i��er� i.:l � " � -j �, Densit;r' f , —; - i - �— -- ---- � � � � I Resiilcatial F �} Z �, i;i�.�i; i7��;,�i:; ;:t:;;lt-,;t;.;� I 1 � � � O 'J = v� - — - — � � (�fiice � I � I I ' i � t� th 4th �h - ___ _ . - - . �. _ _ i r--- s — — � � ('1�[i �i0t'i1c��)lj , � C �!OflllllCt'fl:�� L � � — � v, tt1 �LfI - G � C, � c T � CO `. V Low Density Resjdential z � f' � th btb � r ` PubtidQuasi- � Public ° � � ;� U �S " L .� O �` � -"`" � ,� v v' Public/Quasi-Public th Central Valley � SeniorHig6 � � � .� � � CPA-02-09 Request: Change t6e Compre6ens�ve Plan map desigaation City of Spokane Valley from HDR to NC; c6ange zoning from MF-2 to NC. Commonity Development Department � � • ' ' " � . . � --- - --- - - - ---- _ r _ � __ _ __ _______ �_ ■� , - r � ..,..: �� . . , � � � „1" �'11,,,I . ' '. , , ,// /�///� � / � _/// — � �� ./ � : /�; 1 '- �- r � � , :�_� :� � � � ::�i� % ■ ,�.i,: � � :•. �.. . ,�� ■ � �'111111� � a �� 1 � � �`� � � �� , � � � � . � � � �s /11 ■ �� r� �:� � �� 1 � ��■ ■ . �� , �� ___�___ ��■ � � �. . -,;. . -___.. ___ _ �� ' j��,�./i. .% : :, 1��1 !,:; % �iii :;�; ■■ � � � / ;; ��// ;; j � � �� 1� :,.. � �:: �� 's:�: � �� . ;; ,�% , . .;/. � �� ■ �� ;; ��! ;;/; � � � ., � ' � ,. ��i� ,,/. � S � ,, .. . , ,;, �, 7 ////•. �/�,' .;��• � ,;- . . 1 .. �� 1 ��:: �i� - .�:1� � � ��-� � : . , �� __.____�� . , . � iiiii_____ ;�� ■ . -� - -1 %; :; : �� r 1�� , . ..�: � i / • ••�, �� " � / + :-%: •� ■� , �_ � /; ;;, ; �i /,, .. �. �. �,.. _ .,. �� .,� i .,� . - �� % �s�% %;;�: � �� %._,,: �. �� /;:;�i: � � �1 �'/,/�•.!� 1111 11�� 111 � . .. � �„r-� � ■ �■ ■ %%�% '�% 11�� ' ., ..� ■ , , :;/:;� . , ,;;/;;. , . /..� . , ■ �,.•/... ■ � � .•/. �, • , .•/.:•� � .•/. • � �../.-•� � , -■ ■ _ �,•/,-. - � i �•%i/ �% / / ,•/ �/ _ � � �%%/.;. �;,/ � � ��%/ '' ! � � � � j� ;:� : % � � � •�/ � ■ � �'�'. . ,� . ,,,,;.,, , � - � � 'sii � �. /♦ . �r�� _ :�;;� ■ � I %:j , � • ,. .�� ■ ;/ ;./ � / :/ •• � � � - /�::�' � ;� .%�.� .,i � ��i�� _ ��ii�:-% �::% ��L.� �� b' �. � �� '•�i• i��• i• �� •i•i '.i �� :,,�i� �i � �� :i. - ��i � � i:i� �� i� �� i � i i � 1• � �� i• i 1•�• �• i " E�ibit 1: Comprehensive Plan Map :�: = PublidQuasi-Public ' „��.'�,-�,�, ;►leclium Densit�• Residential ` �<< ._?� ,, . ()fTice �'�".�; . '��:__=��'- �� -� - ;:1::_ #,.{�.� ,. � 1�'�..i.t E �...�. �`� � � �YYl' 1 j:- /+ T�� ` . � _l :", 'i�. ri,P"[-71Y�•� :J.�. :S;'Z 1'�.. ',_. " . ' Low Density R�sid ntial . - - - ; : -�, � � Q CPA-04-09 � f -- -- -__--____- - ----- ---. __. _ ; .;�. I �- I i . � . � . M 1 . _ . _ _ � ' . . . � � • _ � 1 - �_'y� . .__ " �-' _ . Y ' I , 1 1 1 -- C t�r�:t�i�:i�it� f ��i;li,�r��i:ii ��. . �or.rid'or��liied L�se . ` .._ _— --- - ------- --- s { i , - tiCr,: --------- -- — � -- ------- --- ._----------- � --- _ �� - - CPA-04-09 Reqaest: Change the Comprehensive Ptaa map designation City of Spokane Valley from CC to LDR; c6ange zontng from C to R4. Community Development Department ac men a er — an se City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Pian I CHAPTER 2— LAND USE 2.0 Introduction The Land Use chapter serves as the foundation of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive P/an (SVCP) by providing a framework for Spokane Vailey's future physical development and by setting forth policy direction for Spokane Vailey's current and future land uses. Development of land, according to adopted policies and land use designations discussed in this chapter, should result in an appropriate balance of services, employment, and housing. The land use policies are supplemented by a Comprehensive Plan Map (Map 2.1) that provides a visual illustration of the proposed physical distribution and location of various land uses. This map allocates a supply of land for such uses as retail, office, manufacturinq� public facilities, services, er�rp;c�:�er}� parks, open space, and housing to meet future demand. 2.1 Plannln� Context State and county land use policies provide a statutory framework for the development of City land use policies. tt is important to briefly review state and county level policies to better understand historical conditions that have shaped the goals and policies in this chapter. 2.1.1 Growth Management Act The Growth Management Act (GMA) acknowledges that, "...a lack of common goals expressing the public's interest in conservation and the wise use of our lands pose a threat to the environment, sustainable economic development, and the heatth, safety and high quality of life enjoyed by residents of this state'.' The GMA provides a framework for content and adoption of local comprehensive plans. The GMA provides 14 goals to be, `... used exclusively for the purpose of guiding development of comprehensive plans and development regulations.' GMA goals pertaining to land use include: • Urban Growth — Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner. • Reduce Sprawl — Reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling, Iow density development. • Housing — Encourage the avaitability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population of the state, promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage preservation of existing housing stock. • Open Space and Recreafion — Encourage the retention of open space and development of recreational opportunities, conserve fish and wildlife habitat, increase access to natural resource lands and water, and develop parks. • Envirr�nment — Protect the environrnent and enhance the state's high quality of life, including air and water quality and the availability of water. • Public Facilities and Services — Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards. • Historic Preservation — Identify and encourage the preservation of lands, sites, and structures that have historical or archaeological significance_ � RCW 36.70A.010 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 1 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan • Property Rights — Private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation having been made. The property rights of landowners shall be protected from arbitrary and discriminatory actions pursuant to state and federal law. The GMA requires that Comprehensive Plan land use elements include the following: • Designate the proposed general distribution, location and extent of the uses of land for housing, commerce, industry, recreation, open spaces, public utilities, public facilities, and other appropriate land uses; • Population densities, building intensities, and estimates of future population growth; • Provide for protection of the quality and quantity of ground water use for public water supplies; • Review drainage, flooding, and stormwater runoff in the area and nearby jurisdictions and provide guidance for corrective actions to mitigate or cleanse those discharges that pollute water of the state. 2.1.2 County Wlde Planning Policles The County Wide Planning Policies (CWPPs) required by GMA provide a regional framework to achieve the goals of the GMA. The CWPPs are a refinement of policy direction contained in the GMA and are a result of a collaborative process between Spokane County and the cities and towns within the County. The CWPPs provide a policy framework for both the county and its respective cities. Adherence to these policies ensures that plans within the county are consistent with one another. These policies address such issues as the designation of urban growth areas, land use, affordable housing, provision of urban services for future development, transportation, and contiguous and orderly development. The following are specific CWPPs that relate to the Land Use Element Policy Topic 1- Urban G�owth Areas Policies 1. Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) are areas within which urban growth shall be encouraged and outside of which growth can occur only if it is not urban in nature. Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) shall include areas and densities sufficient to permit the urben growth that is projected to occur in the county for the succeeding 20-year period 'Urban growth" refers to growth that makes intensive use of land for the loc:ation of buildings, structures and impermeable surfaces to such a degree as to be incompatible with the primary use of such land for the production of food, other agricultura) products or fiber, or the extraction of mineral resources Urban growth should be located first in areas elready characteriied by urban growth that have existing public facility and service capacities to serve such development, and second in areas slready characteriied by urban growth that will be served by a combination of both existing public facilities and services, and any additional needed public facilities and services that are provided by either public or private sources. Further, it is appropriate that urban govemment services be provided by cities, and urban govemment services should not be provided in rural areas Rural govemment services may be provided in rural areas. However, Urban Growth Areas may be established independent of incorporated areas. Within these independent Urban Growth Areas (UGAs), urban govemmental services may Z RCW 36.70A.210 ' Note to reader. The following pofldes ere numbered acxording to the policy number in the CWPPs, resulting in non-sequential numbe�ing in this document. ' RCW 36.70A110 s RCW 36.70A.03Q(17) ° RCW 36 70A.110(3) Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapt�r 2— Land Use Page 2 of 36 C�ry of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan be provided by other than cities. Some cities may rely on contracts from Spokane County for provision of urban services. Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) include all lands within existing cities, including cities in rural areas. 9. Wrthin Urban Growth Areas (UGAs), lands that falt within planned high-capacity transportation corridors should be designated for sufficient intensity of land use to support the economic provision of multimodal transportation. 11. Where applicable, comprehensive plans should contain land use policies which provide protection for the continued viability of Fairchild Air Force Base, Spokane Intemational Airport, Felts Field, Deer Park Airport and other publicly owned airports within Spokane County. 12. Jurisdictions should work together to protect critical areas and open space within Urban Growth Areas (UGAs). Policy Topic 2- Jolnt Planning within UGAs Policies 1. The joint planning process should: a. Include all jurisdictions adjacent to the Urban Growth Area and Special Purpose Districts that will be affected by the eventual transference of govemmental services; b. Recognize that Urban Growth Areas are potential annexation areas for cities; c. Ensure a smooth transition of services amongst existing municipalities and emerging communities; d. Ensure the ability to expand urban governmental services and avoid land use barriers to e�ansion; and e. Resolve issues regarding how zoning, subdivision and other land use approvals in designated joint planning areas will be coordinated. 2. Joint planning may be accomplished pursuant to an interlocal agreement entered into between and/or among jurisdictions andlor special purpose districts. Policy Topic 3 Promotion of Contlguous and Orderly Development and Provision of Urban Services Policies 5. All jurisdictions shall coordinate plans that classify, designate and protect natural resource lands and critical areas. 7. Each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan shall include, at a minimum, the following policies to address adequate fire protection: a. Limit growth to areas served by a fire protection disirict or within the corporate limits of a city providing its own fire department. b. Commercial and residential subdivisions and developments and residential planned unit developments shall include the provision for road access adequate for residents, fire department or district ingresslegress, and water supply for fire protection. c. Development in forested ereas must provide defensible space between structure and adjacent fuels and require that fire-rated roofing materials be used. 10. Each jurisdiction shall include provisions in its comprehensive plan for equitable distribution of essential public facilities. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 3 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Pian 13. Each jurisdiction shall plan for growth within UGAs which uses land efficiently, adds certainty to capital facilities planning and allows timely and coordinated extension of urban govemmental services, public facilities and utilities for new development. Each jurisdiction shall ide�tify intermediate growth areas (six to ten year increments) within its UGA or establish policies which direct growth consistent with land use and capital facility plans. Policy Topic 4— Parks and Open Space Policies 2. Atl jurisdictions should cooperate to identify and protect regional open space lands, natural areas and corridors of environmental, recreational and aesthetic significance to form a functionally and physically connected system which balances passive and active recreational uses. Each jurisdiction shall identify open space corridors within and between urban growth areas. All jurisdictions shall identify implementation, management, preservation and conservation strategies through both regulatory and non-regulatory techniques, to protect ident�ed lands and comdors to sustain their open space benefits and functions. Implementation and management strategies should include collaboration and coordination with land trusts and other land preservation organizations. 3. Each jurisdiction shall require the development of parks and open space as a means to balance the impacts associated with higher-density development. 5. Each jurisdiction shall make appropriate provisions for parks and recreation areas. Policy Toplc 6 - Transportat�on Policies 5. Local jurisdictions shall develop and adopt land use plans that have been coordinated through the Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) to ensure that they preserve and enhance the regional transportation system. These plans may include high-capacity transportation corridors and shall fulfill air quality conformity and financial requirements of Federal Transportation Laws and Regulations, the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, and the GMA. 6. Local jurisdictions shall designate within land use plans areas that can support public transportation services. These areas shall include existing as well as new development. Each jurisdiction's land use plan, the regional transportation plan and the Spokane Transit Authority's (STA) Long Range Transit Plan shall support, complement and be consistent with each other. 11. Each jurisdiction shall address land use designations and site design requirements that are supportive of and compatible with public transportation, for example: a. pedestrian-scale neighbofioods and activity centers; b. mixed-use development; and c. pedestrian friendly and non-motorized design. Policy Toplc 7— Affordable Housing Policies 2. Each jurisdiction's development policies, regulations and standards should provide for the opportunityr to create effordable housing in its community. Such policies may include regulatory tools, such as inclusionary zoning, performan�mpact zoning, mixed-use development and incentives for increasing density to promote greater choice and affordable housing in its community. Adopted April 25, 200fi (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 4 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehenstve Plan 6. In conjunction with other policy topics, coordinate housing, transportation and economic development strategies to ensure that su�cient land and densities for affordable housing are provided in locations readily accessible to employment centers. 2.2 �and Use Plan Spokane Valley's land use pattem (the physical location of uses) exists as a result of development administered by Spokane County untif incorporation of Spokane Valley on March 31, 2003 and to a far lesser extent the subsequent development under Spokane Valley's jurisdiction. As shown in Figure 2.1 below, the majority of land is designated residential (57%) under this Plan. Of the land designated residential, 50% is designated as Low Density Residential with densities up to six dwelling units per acre. Nearly 20% of the land area is designated as Heavy and Light Industrial. The remaining land is designated as commercial, office, or public/quasi public. Comprehensive Plan Designations - Land PubidQuasi-Pubtic Area Park/Open Spaae 736 Ciry Cenler Comnun�y Corm�erd� 39�6 � Regbnal Commercial � 1% 296 Neighbahood � 3 � 0 / ��or Mbced Use 2°.6 �. \� �� . l� 3 � Cor►rrrerciel � � 096 �� _ � zl Heavy Industrial � 1496 Mixed Use � 3 ��' i � — --- � - � HDR MDR �� 3°k 496 � Light Industlel LDR 596 50°�6 Figure 2.1: Land Use by Comprehensive Plan Category 2.2.1 City Center Plan This scenario presents concepts and strategies for creating a definable and vibrant "City Center" for the City of Spokane Valley. The purposes of creating a Spokane Valley City Center are: 1. Create an identifiable city center that is a social and economic focus of the City; 2. Strengthen the City overall by providing for long-term growth in employment and housing; 3. Promote housing opportunities close to employment and services; 4. Develop land use patterns that suppo�t the development of a more e�ensive regional transportation system, whatever the ultimate configuration may be; 5. Reduce dependency on automobiles; 6. Consume less land with urban development; 7. Maximize the public Investment in infrastructure and services; 8. Provide a central gathering place for the community; and 9. Improve the quality of design for development throughout the City. There are several reasons why a definable, vital City Center is important to Spokane Valley's future. These include: Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 5 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 1. The development of a more intensive, mufti-use c�ty center is a natural step in Spokane Valley's evolution. Most new urban areas start out as bedroom communities. Retail and commercial uses then develop to serve the new residential population. Offrce and industrial activities next begin to locate et key transportation crossroads, adding jobs and strengthening the employment base. Spokane Valley has experienced these evolutionary phases and is now ready for a defined City Center. 2. Economic Development — Spokane Valley has an opportunity to transform itself from an essentially residential community with retail and service based economy to a sub-regional economic center with an expanded, more diverse employment base. 3. Community Support — A survey of Spokane Valley area citizens prior to incorporation overwhelmingly indicated that the lack of identifiable "downtown" and a community gathering place was of concem to a majority of respondents. Community support was tested again wfien the city conducted a statistically valid survey in the spring of 2004. The support to create a City Center was reiterated throughout the community meetings held during the development of the comprehensive plan and the city's informal community survey. A discussion of the results of the city's survey is included in Section 2.10. The following could be components of the City Center: 1. Location: Generally located along the Sprague/Appleway corridor. 2. Size: Between 300 and 400 acres in size. 3. Streets: New streets could be added at every 200 to 400 feet to create an internal grid street system to provide an urban atmosphere. 4. On-street parking would be provided on intemal grid streets. 5. Ground floor retail on both sides of streets. 6. Building out to the edge of the right-of-way and include wide sidewalks to encouraae a lively street scene. 7. Office/Employment uses provided in high visibility locations with adequate parking and adjacent to pleasant surroundings such as open space, retail shops and services. 8. Multi famify housing that is safe, secure, and located so that it is buffered from traffic noise and provides a pedestrian friendly streetscape with connections to parks, schools, shopping, services and transit. 9. Civic/public uses such as city hall, community library, performing arts center, city center park green space or other public uses that would attract people to downtown over an extended portion of the day. Other characteristics of this land use scenario include the following: 1. Neighborhoodlcommunity retail centers - current land use pattems dictate that residents travel to the Sprague Avenue corridor to access some of the most basic goods and services. This scenario would provide for smaller scale, less intensive retaiUcommercial centers in the south end and northeast portions of the city. Potential locations for these centers would be focused at intersections of erterials at the periphery of the city, such as Highway 27132 Avenue, Dishman Mica RoadBowdish Road and Barker RoadlBoone Avenue. 2. Office zoning districts — currently, there is no specific zoning district or comprehensive plan designation for professional office uses. The county has used the UR-22, Multi-family zoning district as its office district, which has resuhed in a number of issues related to rezones and appropriate development standards. Areas that are currently developed in predominantly office uses would be re-designated to an °Office' comprehensive plan designation and zoning districts developed to implement this plan designation would include development standards to implement the policies of the comprehensive plan. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 6 of 36 Ciry of Spokane Valley ComprehensivE Plan Spec'rfic areas in the city include the Evergreen corridor north of Sprague Avenue; Mission east of Pines Road in the Valley Hospital/medical office area; near the intersection of Pines Road and Broadway; and other areas identified through the land use inventory process. 3. "Auto-Rov�' Overlay — The c'rty has several new auto dealerships located along Sprague Avenue. The majority of these dealerships are located befinreen Argonne Road and Thierman Road. Two dealerships are located just west of Dartmouth Road, near the U-City Mall. New car dealerships provide the city with substantial sales tax revenue on one hand, on the other hand auto dealerships can have a sign�cant visual impact on a community and have somewhat unique needs related to development standards, such as signage and street frontege landscaping. This scenario recognizes these circumstances and designates the areas identified above appropriately, and provides policy direction for the implementing development regulations. 4. Mixed-use — this scenario suggests reducing the strip commercial on Sprague Avenue by maintaining Community Commercial zoning only at major intersections such as Pines, Evergreen and Sullivan Roads. Areas in between these commercial "nodes' would be designated as Corridor Mixed-use or some other appropriate designation, which would encourage conversion of these vacant and/or dilapidated commercial areas into areas of office/employment, residential and specialty retail. 5. Industrial areas would not be significantly changed or altered under this or any other scenario. Permitted uses and development standards wou(d be reviewed for appropriateness and changes proposed based on policy direction of the comprehensive plan. 6. The majority of land in the City of Spokane Valley is dedicated to single family residential zoning and land use. The majority of the single family residential areas are designated Low Density Residential under the interim comprehensive plan. This plan designation allows for residential densities from one to six dwelling units per acre. Under this scenario, the existing single family residential zoning districts would be evaluated, and a series of single family districts with minimum lot sizes ranging from 7,000 to 10,000 square feet would be considered. Reducing overall lot sizes would enable the city to maintain its existing single family character, and minimize land needed for mutti-family zoning to accommodate the c'rty's 20 year population growth projection. 7. Areas previously platted in 1+/- acre lots — There are areas in the City that were platted as approximately one acre lots. These areas would be rezoned to an R-1 zoning designation with the intent to preserve the original intent of the zoning fo� these areas. Moreover, these areas would be allowed to maintain a small number of livestock such as horses, cows, or Ilamas in keeping with the rural character of these neighbofioods. 2.3 Relationshi� to Other Comarehenslve Plan Chapters The land use concept set forth in this chapter is consistent with all SVCP chapters. Internal consistency among the chapters of the SVCP translates into coordinated growth and an efficient use of limited resources. Below is a brief discussion of how the Land Use chapter relates to the other chapters of the SVCP. 2.3.1 Economic Development Spokane Valley's economy is disproportionately divided. Dr. Grant Forsyth, Assistant Professor of Economics at Eastern Washington University prepared a report based on year 2000 Census information for the Spokane Valley area. This report, "A Demographic and Economic Analysis for the City of Spokane Valley" indicates that there were nearly 3,000 employer firms employing approximately 43,305 people in the year 2000 with an average annual payroll per employee of approximateiy $29,000 (in 2000 dollars). Dependence on retail trade and service occupations stems primarily from the City's evolution into a regional shopping destination for eastem and southem Spokane County and counties in northem Adopted April 25, 2046 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 7 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive P(an Idaho. Increased regional competition from other retail areas, such as Post Falls and Coeur d'Alene and the City of Spokane, may impact the City's ability to capture future retail dollars. To improve Spokane VaNey's economic outlook, the economic development strategy is to promote a more diverse economy. A diversified economy would achieve a better balance between jobs and housing and support the Cit�s desired qualit�r of life. In conjunction with the Economic Development chapter, this Land Use chapter promotes the following: 1. A City Center composed of mid-rise office buildings, mixed-use retail, and housing. 2. Redevelopment and development of the Sprague Avenue/Appleway Boulevard corridor into an area of quality commercial and Mixed-use development. 3. Establishment of design standards. 4. Presenration of existing single family neighborhoods. The land use map designations support development necessary to achieve the above (see the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map 2.1). A complete discussion of economic development is set forth in the Economic Development chapter. 2.3.2 Capkal Facilities Capital facilities provided by the City include: transportation and streets, pa�tcs and open space, and surface water management. The amount and availability of urban services and infrastructure influences the location and pace of future growth. The City is responsible for the construction and maintenance of parks and recreation facilities, streets and transportation improvements, and surface water facilities. Providing for future growth while maintaining existing improvements depends upon the community's willingness to pay for the construction and financing of new facilities and the maintenance of existing facilities. As outlined in the Capital Facilities Plan, new infrastructure and services may be finar�ced by impact fees, grants, designated capital taxes (real estate excise tax, fuel tax, utility tax), money from the Cit�s general fund or voter approved bonds. To capitalize on the City's available resources for urban services and infrastructure, this Land Use chapter recognizes that concentrating growth is far more cost effective than allowing continued urban sprawl. Concentrating growth also supports the enhancement of future transit improvements. Annex�tion of Urban Growth Areas (UGAs1 to the Citv of Spokane Vallev mav be a lo�ical �ro4ressiQn to ensure centralized planning �nd �revention of urban sorawl. A maior qoal of the GMA is to reduce urban sprawl by encouraqnq development in urban areas where adeauate public facilities exist GMA further states that cities are the lo4ical arovider of urban �ovemment services. Prior to annexation the City of Saokane Va11ev will consider the economic imp�c�s of providinq municipal services at a level consistent with other areas within the Citv. The Citv will not �rovide a Lower level of service in areas being considered for annexation that were in exist�nce in the �roposed areas at the time immediately preceding the annexation process The City will consider PAAS� topogr8p� latld utilization 8�d DODUI8i10� d8f1SItY Wh@11 deteR111�1f1�1 SBNiC@ I@V815. Water Availability — Potable water is provided to residents of Spokane Valley by thirteen water and imgation districts. All drinking water used by residents in Spokane Valley is drawn from the Spokane ValteylRathdrum Prairie Aquifer. Water Quality - Maintaining a clean source of water is vital to the health and livability of the City. Preserving water quality ensures a clean source of drinking water and continued health of the Cit�r's streams and lakes. Maintaining water quality is also important for maintaining the health of the aquifer that relies on surface water for recharge. Contamination of an aquifer by contaminated surface water can lead to serious health concems and/or expensive treatment requirements. To address this concem and impacts of new development, the City has adopted a Stormwater Management Plan. The plan specifies actions to ensure water, quality including the development of detentioNretention facilities to control rate and Adopted April 25, 200fi (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 8 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan quality of water runoff. FurtheRnore, development of a wellhead protection program with the various water providers should provide guidelines to avoid possible contamination. Policies contained in the Natural Environment chapter provide direction for development near wellheads and in aquifer recharge areas. For a complete discussion of water resources and water purveyors in the City of Spokane Valley, refer to the Capital Facilities chapter. 2.3.3 Parks and Open 3pace One of the most important and valued elements of a high quality living and working environment is a parks and open space system. Providing parks and open spaces contributes to a reduction in environmental impacts such as noise and air pollution; increases the value of adjacent properties; provides areas for passive and active recreation; and helps preserve the natural beauty of the City. 2.3.4 Natural Envlronment Spokane Valley's natural beauty is apparent. Streams, wetlands, surrounding mountains and the Spokane River provide a scenic backdrop as well as a source for active and passive recreation for the citizens of Spokane Valley. The Land Use chapter seeks to protect Spokane Valley's unique natural resources through policies that support the preservation of these areas for future generations. The Natural Environment chapter also includes a discussion of critical areas as defined by GMA. For a complete discussion, please refer to the Natural Environment chapter. 2.3.6 Housing Housing is a basic human need and a major factor in the quality of life for individuals and families. An adequate supply of affordable, attractive, and functional housing is fundamental to achieving a sense of community. The central issue related to land use is suppiying enough land to accommodate projec�ed growth for a range of incomes and households. Presently, housing is provided primarily in single-family subdivisions. This plan sets forth strategies to increase housing options and choices. The Land Use chapter advocates changes to current development codes to increase flexibility in platting land and encourage housing as part of mixed-use developments in commercial areas. The latter provides an opportunity to locate housing closer to employment and shopping, and to create affordable housing. A complete discussion of housing can be found in the Housing chapter. 2.4 Potential Annexation Areas 2.4.1 Projected Growth — In October 2003 the City of Spokane CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Valley received a 2000 population POPULATION ESTIMATES cert�cation from the U.S. Census 150,000 Bureau that indicated 80,927 people called Spokane Valley home on April �4o,oao 1, 2000. As of April 1, 2003 the � 3a,000 population had grown to 82,005 �20,000 (based on the Washington State Office of Financial Managemeni >> o,000 (OFM) population estimates). Upon ��,oao incorporation on March 31, 2003, the 90,000 City of Spokane Valley became the eo,000 . � . ,� � state's ninth largest city and second � � �, � �, �, � � � � �, ? �, largest in Spokane County. o 0 o� o� o� o o�� o�� o� o�� o�, o�� o�,� Spokane Valley received an OFM - population estimate for April 1, 2004 Populatio�: ActuaUEaGmate of 83,950. This new population P�v�� E�u�,�e: �.sx c�w�n �e estimate moved Spokane Valley from Paputation Esttmaln: t5�i CsraMh Rda the state's ninth largest city to the Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 9 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan state's eighth largest city. The 2004 population estimate reflects an annual increase of approximately 2.4 percent over the city's 2003 population estimate. The most recent OFM estimate � for Spokane Valley is 88,2g'�-920 as of April 1, �'�-�2008. This figure represents an annual growth rate of approximately 1.5 percent. The average annual growth rate is approximately 1.91 % over I the 4 year period from 2003 to 2007. Future population growth is forecasted at the state and county level by OFM. This future population groHRh was distributed between jurisdictions and unincorporated Spokane County through a methodology prepared by the Spokane County Steering Committee of Elected Officials (SCEO). The City of Spokane Valley was not allocated population growth originally because the City had not been incorporated when this action took place. However, the County did allocate population to the 'Spokane Valley IUGA', wfiich includes the new cities of Spokane Valley and Liberty Lake. This process resulted in a population growth allocation of 39,431 to the Spokane Valley IUGA. This IUGA also includes areas within the UGA that are still in unincorporated Spokane County. The graph above indicates Spokane Va11ey's 20 year population using a 1.5% and 2.5% annual growth rate. Using the 1.5% annual growth rate, which is consistent with past estimated growth rates in the Spokane Valley area, the estimated 2025 population of Spokane Valley is 114,765 or an increase of 30,815 persons. The 2.5% annual growth rate results in a 2025 population of 141,011, an increase of 57,061. Spokane Valley proposed a population allocation of 20,666 to the SCEO based on the regional land capacity methodology. This request was proposed as an "interim" request based on the land/population capacity within the existing corporate boundaries of Spokane Valley. The reason for this request was based on the significant issues related to waste water treatment capacity. Once the waste water issues have been resolved, Spokane Valley will prepare a revision to the population allocation and present this information to the SCEO. This issue is discussed in more detail below. The Spokane County Board of County Commissioners (BoCC) approved this population allocation in November 2004. The City has continued to refine the population projections based on the preceding information. At a City Council retreat held on February 11, 2006, the City Council directed staff to utilize a 1.89% annual growth rate for purposes of population forecasting. This resufted in a 20 year population forecast of 38,fi14 persons. This information was presented to the SCEO on February 15, 2006 when the City officialfy requested a 20 year population allocation of 38,614 for planning purposes. In 2006 the BoCC approved via Resolution 06-0438 a population allocation of 33,125 for Spokane Valley for planning purposes. 2.4.2 Land Capacity Analysis The GMA does not require a Population and Land Capacity Element to be included in the comprehensive plan. However, GMA does require that Land Use, Housing and Capital Facilities Elements include population densities, building intensities and estimates of future population growth. The GMA also requires a Lend Capacity Analysis, or the theoretical holding capacity of the designated Urban Growth Areas, which by definition includes cities. By assigning the expected population growth to the results of the Land Capacity Analysis, the area required to accommodate the population growth is shaped. Countywide population forecasts are identfied by the CWPPs, as one criterion for consideration in developing a regional meihodology or countywide population allocation. The countywide growth target is based on the OFM growth management population forecast for Spokane County. The Land Quantity Analysis Methodology for Spokane County was developed through the efforts of the Land Quantity Technical Committee between March 1995 and October 1995. The Growth Managernent Steering Committee of Elected Officials adopted that methodology on November 3, 1995. The adopted methodology is pattemed after the Washington State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development's (CTED) land quantity inventory guidebook entitled lssues in Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 10 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Designating Urban Growth Areas Part 1- Providing Adequate Urban Area Land Supply. Use of that document was specified by the adopted Countywide Planning Policies (Policy Topic 1(Urban Growth Areas Policy #3). However, the step-by-step CTED process was modified somewhat by the I Land Quantity Technical Committee to reflect unique circumstances in Spokane County. The following steps of the regional methodology were followed by Spokane Valley in conducting the land capacity anaiysis: 1. Identify lands that are potential candidates to accommodate future growth - vacant, partially-used and under-utilized land (in other words, subtract all parcels committed to other uses). 2. Subtract all parcels that the community defines as not developable because of physical limitation. 3. Subtract lands that will be needed for other public purposes. 4. Subtract all parcels that the community determines are not suitable for development for social and economic reasons. 5. Subtract that percentage of land that the community assumes will not be available for development within the community plan's 20-year time frame. 6. Build in a safety factor. 7. Determine total capac�ry. Spokane Valley prepared a land capacit�r anaiysis of the city and surrounding UGAs based on the above regional methodology. ' ' an�+�g-A�#�,�� #��e��-�e:c� `-� � :-� r -�~�--t�a#ef��e�--�e�- . , ., ��-8-s��-��1�-� f£r-p�t�pe�es�i �e��sti�,era--�L��!a�ie�:rc��r�-,��-p��rg ��a��: The results of the land capacit�r analysis are contained in the table below: Table 2.1 Spokane Valley UGA Land Capacity Analysis u d ted �:}'-�-��-�412/05/Q8) � Vacant and Net Oevelopable Potentiat New Population Area ParUalty Used Acrss Dwelline Unlb Capactty Land , SpokaneValley ;,� ; ' �,: i - �= 7 G�3 � � _,, (Incorporated Area) — � - - - - i _ . � - - � Northeast � --- 4_� -- - �_ � 92 �Q Northwood � I , 4�2 1.367 � 418 �t -�-- �- � - � � 3outheast - -- 4$Z � 238 - - -- - - $� — - 2,3 81 - 3outh - -- �4 � � - � - - - 1.089 - - - 2.722 Ponderosa - -- - _ � - - � - L _1 - _ - - 1$� - - __ 1$ - Edgecllff/Dfshman � i 1� � 527 1319 TOTAL ---- - � f� ��° � ?_ �'�i1 j 12.575 I 2? �?; Spokane Valley recommended to the Stesring Committee that both the City of Spokane Valley and the City of Liberty Lake receive an interim population allocation that could be accommodated within the existing city limits of each crty. The rationale for this recommendation was based on the situation regarding sanitary sewer throughout the entire Spokane region. It is estimated that the Spokane County treatment plant will run out of capacity in 2009, and the Liberty Lake Water 8� Sewer District treatment capability is currently at or near capac'rty. Permits to expand the Spokane County and Liberty Lake plants from the Washington State Department of Ecology and the Environmental Protection Agency are currently in doubt. Given the potential constraint for both jurisdictions to provide this vital urban service, the Steering Committee forwarded a recommendation to the Spokane County Board of County Commissioners to allocate Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 11 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan only the population that could be accommodated within existing city limits until such time as the sanitary sewer issues are resolved. 2.4.3 Potential Annexatlon Areas The purpose of this section is to identify the unincorporated areas within the existing Spokane County UGA that are adjacent to the City of Spokane Valley, which would comprise pvtential annexation ar�eas for the City. Map 2.2 indicates potential annexation areas (PAAs) for the City of Spokane Valley. Spokane County adopted its first comprehensive plan developed under GMA in 2001. A complete examination of urban senrices was required at the time the County established the UGA, moreover, Spokane County was obligated to compty with the State Environmental Policy Act. The County's plan included the designation of a regional UGA, which included the still unincorporated area of Spokane Valley. The County utilized the SEPA/GMA integration process to fulfill the environmental review requirements of the plan including the designated UGA. When Liberty Lake incorporated in 2001 and Spokane Valley incorporated in 2003 much of the 'Valley UGA° was included as part of the newly created cities, but not all. In 2003 and again in 2006, Liberty Lake completed annexations totaling 975.69 acres of the County designated UGA. These annexations resulted in a nearly 34 percent increase (from 4.5 square miles to just over 6 square miles) in land area for Liberty Lake. As Table 2.1 indicates there are a number of unincorporated UGAs adjacent to Spokane Valley. Several of these UGAs are only contiguous to Spokane Valley (south, southeast, and northeast) and would be logical areas for future annexation to the City of Spokane Valley. Spokane County and the metro cities of Spokane Valley, Spokane, Liberty Lake and Airway Heights have begun the process of updating the regional UGA consistent with the county wide planning policies (CWPPs). Through this process, the City of Spokane Valley will identify areas needed to accommodate allocated population growth by re-evaluating land quantity analysis and urban service delivery. 2 d n D�veleement of Geals, Pglicies. and Actions for Annexation The Growth Management Act (GMA) reauires counties to designate Urban Growth Area (UGAs) within which urban �rpwth shall be encouraqed RCW 36.70A.110 (1�. UGAs are to lnclude sufficient land to accommodate the twentv-vear population arowth projected for the countv. The GMA imposes planninQ reauirements to influence the ability of a citv to annex UGAs. A cifit is �e4uired bv GMA to adopt policies for land use housinq capital facilities, utilities, and transoortation within #he citv's UGA In arder to rneet this reauirement the Citv of S�okane Vallev has developed policies and goals to provide �olicv Quidance for annexation of territorv within UGAs. Annexation will have financial impacts on the citv' it mav be oositive or neqative. The Citv mav need to develop an annexation studY to assess the financial im acts esaecially for larper annexations. The Caaital Facilities chapter ldentifies current service providers within the Potential Annexation Areas (PAAsI as a startina point for the detailed_anah�sis � that may be needed prior to annexation � . . 2.5 Land Use Desi�nattons , �-��' - � � -�'�=- ` R � ; � ,� �r _ l, .r. The land use designations in the SVCP recogn�ze the - ,��.�` � ..� -•�--- ,__ _ ._ .,�.� : relationships between broad patterns of land uses. _- . __ � The designations set forth locat+onal criteria for each = - - . _ � _ _ : - . � � • _ . ` � .� specific class of uses consistent with the long-term � . � '` ��' �' _ _ ��` " � . � �'� r ,:: � , objectives of the SVCP. These designations provide � �, � .: �� : ,•� � � � ` �- the purpose and intent for specific zoning districts. _ � -� - .. �.. � ` : '� �"� � � �� *��`� . :�� The location of the comprehensive plan land use - ', � �-• , �;`Y+ • �� 'r- •� . designations are shown on the Comprehensive Plan • �"" ` Land Use Map (Map 2.1). Adopted Aptil 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 12 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Ptan 2.5.1 Resldential The demand for and development of singie-famity housing is expected to continue for the foreseeable future. Single-family development will occur as in-fill development of vacant or under developed fots scattered throughout existing neighborhoods, and as subdivisions on vacant tracts of land. To address future housing needs, the Land Use chapter encourages new techniques for developing single-family housing. Such techniques include clustering, planned unit developments, Iot size averaging, zero lot line development, accessory dwelfing units and special needs housing. Low Denslty Resldential The Low Density Residential (LDR) Comprehensive Plan designation addresses a range of single famiiy residential densities from one dwelling unit per acre up to and including six dwelling units per acre. This designation would be implemented through a series of zoning designations as described below. Implementing zoning for the LDR designation will include a series of zones allowing a range of minimum lot si�es. �� Existing lot si�es and community character =:: will be strongly considered when � '�=�'� �� developing the City's zoning map. For —.�� ' example, areas such as Rotchford Acres ' , J and Ponderosa will likely require minimum �;�" lot sizes close to an acre in size. These -- ..-.__ ��.� s.�- -' large lot developments currently allow for . - horses and other large animals and have a distinct character that should be preserved to the greatest extent possible. The 1� -- .. . majority of the LDR designation will `�• provide for densities ranging from four to six dwelling units per acre. Typical lot sizes will range from 7,000 to 10,000 square feet. Some areas designated as LDR still lack necessary urban senrices and infrastructure, mainly sanitary sewer facil�ties. Upon provision of urban services, such as water and sewer, and transit services, an increase in density in some areas may be warranted. However, the City will adopt strict criteria to evaluate zone changes to ensure that future development is compatible with the surrounding neighbofiood. Medium Density Residential The Medium Density Residential designation represents an opportunity to provide a range of housing types to accommodate anticipated residential growth. The increase in population, decline in average family size, and increased cost of single-family homes have created increased demand for new housing types. The Land Use chapter encourages the development of housing types, such as duplexes, townhouses, and condominiums in existing multi-family areas and within mixed-use development in commercial areas. Multi-family uses, in large part, are in areas currently zoned for multiple-family development. Zoning will allow densities up to 12 dwelling units per acre in the Medium Density Residential designation. Opportunities for new development will occur through redevelopment and build-out of remaining parcels. Multi-family residential zones should be used as transitional zoning between higher intensity land uses such as commercial and office, to lower density single family neighborhoods. Additionally, Medium Density Residential areas should be located near services and high capacity transit facilities or transit routes. Residential design guidelines that address design and appearance of multiple-family developments should be considered. The primary goal of residential design guidelines is to develop multiple-family housing that is reflective of the community's character and appearance. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 13 of 36 City of Spokane Valiey Comprehensive Plan High Density Residentiai This designation provides for existing multi-family residential development developed at a density in excess of 12 units per acre. Additionally, High Densit�r Residential (HDR) designated areas are elso located in areas near higher intensity development, such as a City Center. HDR provides housing opportunities for younger, lower income households in the City who may not yet be able to afford a home of their own. Moreover, this designation provides housing options for people looking to "downsize" from a single family dwelling on an individual lot, or for those known as °empty- nesters" whose childnen have moved out of the household and a large single family home is no longer needed. Generally, this designation is appropriate for land which is located adjacent to the arterial street system served by public transit, and is in close proximity to business and commercial centers. 2.6.2 Commerclal Designatlons Existing commercial areas are auto-oriented and characterized by one-story low intensity development. In the future, these areas will become more intensively developed and pedestrian oriented, and in some designations, accommodate housing. Transforming existing areas into places where people went to live, shop, and work requires changes. Commercial areas should contain street fumiture, trees, pedestrian shehers, well marked crosswalks, and buildings oriented to and along the street to provide interest and allow easy pedestrian access. Regional Commercial ,� ! � The Regional Commercial � � designation encompasses two major /'' ~` � ' �.��. retail areas of the Crty. It cove�s the �- .�; "strip' retail areas along Sprague �'. *. . � � _ - ► � - Avenue which includes the - - �� {. ,�, , = ��; ;i �' automobile deaferships located along � �� .' . .'� � . the westem end of the SpraguE - :.-.- �.�� _ ` -- - �� - Avenue comdor and the °big box� � ;�r� --� '� • ''°�►i�= �� .; �� ;; retail area found in the Sullivan Road �: �.�..-, �� -•-� �� area from Sprague Avenue north to . j-- t�- �` the Interstate 90 interchange, and ' ; includes the Valley Mall and Wal- Mart. Regional Commercial allows a 1 •_ � ,�: large range of uses. A wide range of � - development types, appearance, ages, function, and scale can be found along Sprague Avenue. �1der, single-story developments provide excellent opportunities for redevelopment. To create retail areas that are aesthetically and functionally attractive, revised development standards should be applied through Regional Commercial zoning, along with the adoption of Community Design Guidelines which address design quality, mixed-use, and the integration of auto, pedestrian, and transit circulation. Site design, modulation, and setback requirements are also addressed. . : ��`�-� '' ��'- - . �� ,� ` ,_ ' { ! � --� � .�' i_ . ., ' � Community Commercial ' � . � �. - .� =� _�; The communiry commercial class�cation _ . _ ; __ _ _ _ , designates areas for retail, service and office � � - establishments intended to serve several neighborhoods. Community Commercial areas should not be larger than 15-17 acres in size and � - should be located as business clusters rather _. than arterial strip commercial development. ��=�- �� Community Commercial centers may be _ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use Page 14 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan designated through the adoption of the comprehensive plan, comprehensive plan amendments or through sub-area planning. Residences in conjunction with business and/or multifamily developments may be allowed with performance standards that ensure compatibility. In addition, light assembly or other unobtrusive uses not traditionally located in commercial zones may be allowed with appropriate performance standards to ensure compatibility with surrounding uses or zoning districts. Neighbofiood Commerclal The neighborhood commercial classification designates areas for small-scale neighborhoods serving retail and office uses. Neighborhood business areas should not be larger than finro acres in size, and should be located as business clusters rather than arterial strip commercial developments. Neighborhood business centers may be designated through the adoption of the comprehensive plan, comprehensive plan amendments or through neighborhood plans. Auto-Row Overtay The City of Spokane Valley is home to several major new automobile dealerships. While these land uses provide a positive economic impact on the community, they can also have less positive impacts on the aesthetics of the community. Auto dealerships typically have vast areas of pavement to store new and used vehicles for sale. These land uses also have unique requirements for landscaping and signage. Unlike many commercial uses whose stock in trade is contained within a building, it is necessary for auto dealerships to have their vehicles cleariy visible from the street. This makes traditional street side landscaping (consisting of low growing shrubs and bushes, and trees) not viable for these uses. An overlay designation is being suggested rather than a zoning district because the negative affects on the non-auto dealer uses in the area will be minimized or eliminated. 2.fi.3 City Center The intent of establishing a City Center in Spokane Valley is to create a higher density, mixed-use designation where office, retail, government uses, and residential uses are concentrated. The City Center witl also be located at one of the major hubs of the region's high capacity transit (HC� system. The City Center encourages higher intensity land uses. Traditional city centers are places where diverse office, retail, and govemment uses are concentrated, as well as cultural and civic facilities, community services and housing. Nationally, many cities are advocating mixed-use development in city center core _- � � areas for a number of reasons, _ .. .�� . - - `� `�� including: _ �= • Providing new housing, � . increasing the range of � ' �' � � y ._ ::, s; . housing choices, and _ - =�� Y � _ reducing dependency _.. .: — on the automobile by '' � � bringing work places and residences into close proximity; • Providing retail and - - � - - t service nesds in close - - " -.�. � proximity to residential �- -� � *�' , . �. and employment centers; �'� • Improving feasibility of Adopted April 25, 200fi (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2– Land Use Page 15 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan a development project. The proximity of urban services makes housing projects more desirable and a nearby source of consume�s help make a commercial project more viable. Residents choose to live in higher density housing for a variety of reasons. First, higher density housing is more affordable than traditional single family housing. Second, the convenienoe and proximity to work, needed services and cultural activities is very desirabte for many people. Finally, many people find that they do not need a large, single family detached house. Given their lifestyle, they appreciate the low -- `�`►�� maintenance and security of higher dens'rty living. There is a mutually supportive - relationship between higher density - � �� . > � �... � .,�.. � - residential uses and commercial and retail _ _ _ __ _ ; .�_ � ,��. , . �-- activities. The presence of housing the core ___ _,,� r� area also activates the streets in the city � -' - center, day and night. '. - - � �, �' �` '� .. ., . Concentrating growth in a specific area also .'. �., � supports investment in public infrastructure ` • � .?+=' �_ '- �� including the regional HCT system. Existing �� y 1� 4 =� � l o w d e n s i t y develo pment does not generate sufficient levels of demand to optimize the `' �,; _ � �r �J. r_ � � return on investment in transit. Prornoting s , �� _ , higher density uses within walking distance of r transit facilities will improve the viability of this significant infrastructure investment. Moreover, concentrating the highest density of development in the City Center, where a significant number of jobs and residences will be within walking distance of a transit station, helps reduce the dependency on the automobile and improves pedestrian mobility. The City Center emphasizes pedestrian, bicycle, and transit mobility but wil! not be unfriendly to the use of automobiles. � The City Center area will also be the central gathering �� , � place for the community — a place where the whole a Y�'` ., community can oongregate and celebrate. Acc�rdingly, , _ - `-: �' �= -=�.; -<�- f Y� the City Center should include an outdoor square, park, or . .. �� i�F commons with amenities such as fountains, sculptures, !�,^ -'' and unique landscaping. Other civic amenities or ,� ��,�.�' buildings including city hall or a performing arts center M -_ �� ' could be grouped around the core area square or park. ��'�'"�` Y� �'� �� The City currentfy holds an annual Christmas Tree �,rA �,�,�,3�1,�..�. � _ ' �� _ - ,�,� Lighting Ceremony in the area designated as the City q , �, ,�, .�`' Center. Additional such events throughout the year will t, -� �:.� - ,�,��, �_- •�'.� enhance the feeling of community in Spokane Valley. _ '1" - F ' J .�_ " y'. `- '�' An a ro riate street network is a critical com onent of � �'� pP P p ��" ' the City Center. The current network of collector streets and arterials, the disjointed grid, and large block sizes contribute to a lack of identity in the City. The solution is not necessarily to construct wider streets. Streets become less efficient as the number of lanes increases. Building new streets versus widening existing streets can be more cost effective, yietds greater capacity, and will have a more positive irnpact on the City Center. Automobiles are likely to continue as a dominant mode of transportation for the foreseeable future. A comprehensive network of streets must be developed to distribute this traffic and create more driving choices. To the extent possible, the City should connect streets and construct new streets to form a tighter grid system within the City Center, especially in the core area, by negotiating new public rights-of-way and building new streets. This 'interconnectivity° serves to sho�ten and disperse trips, and consequently reduce travel on existing congested arterials. Adopted April 25, 20U6 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 16 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Pedestrian and bicycle mobility is a vital part of the future City Center -- - L ''��-�_ transportation system. Improvements ' � � � ., for pedestrians and bicyclists should � _�;, `.� _ support increases in transit services ('�, 'J , k � _. and promote the development of the ' • �� \�� City Center. As the street system is �_ �- ',� � developed to better accommodate the } �� needs of pedestrians and bicyclists, a �-1 �. � network of facilities for people on foot _ , .� ; and bikes should be established. • �,,r_��_: - .- <i. - _ . -, - Reducing the size of the street grid, -� �' ,� C_:� i.� -' improving auto circulation and creating �`�- -"� pedestrian linkages through larger `' ,�bN parcels is critical to establish walking c� t.��`�r��..b patterns that reduce dependency on the auto. As individual sites are designed and developed to be more pedestrian friendly and improved pedestrian linkages are provided, the pedestrian system will handle an increasing share of trips. Special street design standards should be developed for the City Center. Special standards for extra-wide sidewalks (12 to 20 feet in width), pedestrian-scale street lighting, and additional amenities including benches, trash receptacles, and landscaped comer treatments should be included. Transforming the existing commercial core area into the proposed City Center is an ambitious task. It requires a significant transformation from a low-density, automobile oriented, largely retail area, to a higher intensity, more pedestrian oriented Mixed-use area. The City Center section of the Plan acknowledges that the City Center will take some time to develop. The City can �acilitate these changes through a series of small steps taken over time. This is especially true if the steps are consistent with emerging economic, social and demographic trends. As is the intent of this Plan, the phasing scenario presented here accounts for the timing of market projections and future actions. As noted above, the implementation � strategy is keyed to projected trends � .� �,� �� , r -: .": ,� and regional planning goals. Its form � - � � ��`�'��' r ,:- , �'' .= ' � � �'' and character, as envisioned in th is �;�.,�'��.�, �'�� . �y,;�� '�{A �� ' � Plan, are dramatically different from ,j �� ;, �� , _�t �� `��'�=' � r� � anything that now exists in the .� , •, f ' �,'' ` " '•�. G proposed City Center area. It wifl � � .� .` ;_, take some time for the development � d�. �� `_ community to redirect its energy and • investments to produce development that responds to the direction of the �, � M� �� _ t Plan. The demand for more intense • � development opportunities in the City �' �, :�, ,, �.,�, � Center is not forecasted within the next few years. In the meantime, the ""'� T'�"" City should discourage continued low- scale investment in this area since new development will take several years to be amortized, and will delay the accomplishment of prefeITed development. As regulations are applied to modest renovations, it should be possible to gain some basic improvements. However, the City should not expect full implementation of the vision for the City Center until major property owners in the area are ready to install long-term, major development projects. The figures (computer generated as part of the TOD Study) at the beginning of this section first show the existing conditions of the City Center, the second figure illustrating potential redevelopment of the area over time. The pictures are taken from app roxim ate ly Farr Road loo king Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use Page 17 of 36 City of Spokane Valiey Comprehensive Plan east toward the U-City Mall area. The photos do not necessarify indicate specific recommendations for the area, but are merely an illustration of how a viable City Center could evoive through several coordinated, incremental steps taken over time. 2.6.4 Office Deslgnation Spokane Valley has areas of quality office development. Several I T developments within the � _ � �=� . �. Argonne/Mullan Couplet, Pines Road. � � : - and Evergreen Road corridors . � ;_ ' � � embody good design and are - - " ��.� � ' - representative of desired future office i: �a�;� �: �� 1, �. -� .� development. Office development " '�'"' will provide new job opportunities - � + � '�' ~ � � ,� � � =-e , ��ti � �►?: � within the oommunity. . --� � �=`j�..'�w��%° ``�� _ �, , This comprehensive plan designation � � - - is intended primarily for office � development with limited retail or commercial uses. Retail and commercial uses are limited to those that are clearly subord�nate to the primary office use, or the retail function primarily serves the office uses in close proximity to the retail or commercial use. Primary uses which are representative of this comprehensive plan category, include medical end dental facilities, education services, insurance, real estate, financiai institutions, design firms, and legal services. Areas designated as Office can serve a variety of functions. They can stand alone as major employment centers. They can also act as buffers or transition areas between higher intensity land uses and lower intensity land uses. For example, Office areas can provide a transition between industrial or commercial uses and residential areas. Office uses work well for this because they tend to generate less traffic and noise, operate shorter hours and are often smaller in scale then industrial or commercial areas. The Office comprehensive plan designation will be implemented through a series of office zoning districts. '`k�' �''-� � ► r' 2.6.6 Mixed-use `��- "� _-- The concept of 'Mixed-use" has been ; _ , . �,� � `� � � � ' ae a � around for centuries. Prior to the ,� �, -=� ,� Q` f� �� F advent of the automobile an d t he �' '}. z� �� +� �` proliferation of the road and highway _ .� '•" � �� _ � ■ ;�" ; � � � �� system, Maed-use was a _�. _ j., �� . predominant urban form. The -� ` ='�""— '�� - - -- - ` "rediscovery" of this development � � �' + type may be due in part to the negative impacts of sprawl, which _ have resulted in traffic congestion, decline in air quality, and inefficient use of resources and infrastructure. Mixed-�se d�veiopment has several potential benefits: • Lend and infrastructure resources are used more efficiently; • Pedestrian-friendly neighborhoods; • Jobs are located near housing; • Opportunities to revitalize commercial corridors; Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use Page 18 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Pian • Opportunities for infill residential development (primarily in corridors); • Encourage new housing and innovative retail that is (ess auto dependent; and • Compatibility with existing transit access along local corridors. Mixed-use may be either "horizontal Mixed-use' or °vertical Mixed-use." Horizontal Mixed-use means that residential, commercial, office and other uses are adjacent to each other typically as part of an overall master plan for a site. However, not all projects within a"Mixed-use° designated area must be Mixed-use to achieve the goals of this plan. For example, a new residential-only project that is appropriately designed and located adjacent to an older existing commercial building may help stimulate renovation and reuse. This would be a more likety scenario in the Corridor Mixed-use area rather than the Mixed-use area. Vertical Mixed-use means that residential and nonresidential uses are stacked over each other. Typically, residential uses are placed over ground level retail, offices and/or restaurant uses. This development type would be more likely to occur in the City Center or in the areas designated as Mixed-use. Corridor Mixed-Use Corridor Mixed-use is intended to enhance travel options, encourage development of locally serving commercial uses, multi-family apartments, lodging and offices along major transportation corridors identified on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map (Map 2.1). Corridor Mixed-use recognizes the historical low-intensity, auto-dependent development pattem, and focuses on a pedestrian orientation with an emphasis on aesthetics and design. The Corridor Mixed-use designation is primarily used along Sprague Avenue in order to space the areas designated commercial. Mixed-Use Center The Mixed-use Center designation would allow for two or more different land uses within developments under this designation. As described above, Mixed-use developments can be either vertical or horizontally mixed, and would include employment uses such as office, retail and/or lodging along with higher density residential uses, and in some cases community or cultural facilities. Mixed-use developments in this designation are characterized by diffiering land uses which are developed pursuant to a coherent, approved plan of development. Compatibility between uses is achieved through design which integrates certain __-.- _ _ physical and functional features such as _ �� '� s �� `� � r , :�� .� ,�_��: trensportation systems, pedestrian ways, open i '�,� �-: ��'�� x'' areas or cc�,�` y�sr�is �,�ci �c�. f:�c�' poi�,�� ~ - . amenities 4 � ? . .� � �!}� !'.�! !: �� .. ,, 2.5.6 Industrial Designations �;F Providing for industrial land is important for th.� _�.it _ _ __ _ � =�� ' � - � ' economic health of Spokane Val{ey. Industrial businesses help drive the local economy and create an economic multiplier effect throughout the region Providing an adequate supply of usable land with minimal environmental constraints and infrastructure in place helps ensure that Spokane Valley will be an attractive place for industrial businesses to locate and prosper. �See Chapter 7, Economic Development, for additional policies that encourage recruitment and retention of industrial business.) Heavy Industry Heavy industry is characterized by intense industrial activities which include, but are not limited to, manufacturing, processing, fabrication, assembly/disassembly, freight-handling and similar Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 19 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan operations. Heavy industry may have significant noise, odor or aesthetic impacts to surrounding areas. Commercial, residential and most recreational uses should not be allowed in areas designated for heavy industry, except for small-scale ancillary uses serving the industrial area. The conversion of designated industrial lands to other uses should be limited. Limiting incompatlble uses ensures a competitive advantage in business recruitment by providing adequate industrial land supply, reducing land use conflicts and preventing inflation of land prices. Moreover, allowing a wide variety of commercial, retail and other uses in the Industrial areas would be in conflict with other portions of this Plan related to concentrating major commercial growth in nodes at the intersection of major streets. Llght Industry The Light Industry designation is a planned industrial area with special emphasis and attention given to aesthetics, landscaping, and intemal and community compatibility. Uses may include high technology and other Iow-impact industries. Light Industry areas may incorporate office and commercial uses as ancillary uses within an overall plan for the industrial area. Non-industrial uses should be limited and in the majority of cases be associated with permitted industrial uses. The Light Industry category may serve as a transitional category between heavy industrial areas and other less intensive land use categories. The category may also serve as a visual buffer for heavy industrial areas adjacent to aesthetic corridors. 2.b.T O The �-�1' Parks and Oaen Space '� � '- � � r designation is intended to p�te�-l-�-��se�ac--��a: � -�'`�«'� ��'�'�� E �t��, F't�jl--E�Ei�4i@ "' `' C �, ` ' •` �: � � � � � �.�' r � �- � �� .�.: + � 3 ;. . =� .,�: " � I , � 7 _1 �+ t .. 1 •, ♦ � �< i� �;}_ �f �}, .� . R ' , , _ ''c' - �' - , `� _ ` =.� � � *. ^� • �:' � �1'��e�es�a�e,=�-prav�-�a��-protect�_ � - � _. � � parks, open space, and other natural physical assets , � �± ,-,�- �-:�.,'�� ' _"f % of the community. <- '�' -;� '' << t"VOQ'ttf�C�'o � . .. , 1 � .r.' + i�—�26i�F�+@F ' �,��f�:`�� " , �#3�-�+��i8�- . � 2.6 Development Revlew Process The Land Use chapter provides the policy foundation � T for implementing zoning end development regulations. In developing policy concerning future land use regulations, or revisions to e�dsting regulations, every effort has been made to instill certainty and efficiency in the development process. State legislation has focused on developing streamlined and timely pennit processing. Through the goals and policies of this Plan, the City will continue to strive to provide an efficient and timely review system. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-20Q8) Chapter 2- Land Use Page 20 of 36 City of Spakane Valley Comprehensive Pian 2.7 Urban Desi�n and Fonn In addition to guiding development, the Land Use chapter also guides the quality and character of the City's future development pattern through goals and policies related to the form, function, and appearance of the built environment. These priorities and implementation strategies, related to quality development, serve and will continue to seroe as a basis from which to develop appropriate implementation measures. The design of our urban environment has a significant effect on community identity. Well designed communities contribute to a healthful, safe and sustainable environment that offers a variety of opportunities for housing and employment. An attractive and well planned community is invaluable when recruiting new business and industry to an area. Some of the concepts considered include: • Community appearance, including signs and placement of utilities; • Neighbofiood considerations in the review of development projects; • Integration and linking of neighborhoods including bicycle and pedestrian facilities; • The effect of traffic pattems and parking on neighborhood character; • Encouragement of high quality development through the appropriate use of planned unit developments; and • Consideration for public art. 2.7.1 Aesthetic Corridors Aesthetic corridors are intended to protect the visual appeal of Spokane Valley along major transportation routes entering and exiting the city. Aesthetic corridors provide special design standards for aesthetics along major transportation routes to help create a quality image of Spokane Valley. Another component of aesthetic corridors is the 'gateways' into the city. There are several entrances into the City of Spokane Valley along major transportation corridors, including Sprague Avenue, Trent Avenue, State Route 27 and a number of interchanges on Interstate 90. Design elements and landscaping treatments should denote a sense of arrival into the City, a neighborhood or special area such as the city center. 2.7.2 Planned Unit Developments Building flexibility into the subdivision process is important to allow for new concepts and creative site design. Planned unit developments (PUDs) provide the city a tool for altowing flexibility, while ensuring a design meets overall health and safety standards, and is consistent with neighbofiood character. PUDs allow for deviations from the typical zoning standards in exchange for designs that protect the environment, provide usable open space, and exhibit exceptional quality and design. 2.8 Historical and Cuttural Resources 2.8.1 Background In many ways, Spokane Valley's historic and cultural resources are similar to our rich natural resources. Like wetlands, rivers, lakes, streams and other natural resources, historic properties are a finite and endangered resource. Also like our natural resources, once an historic or archaeological property is destroyed, it is lost forever. Cultural resources such as historic buildings, monuments of historic events and archaeological sites are statements of Spokane Valley's identity. People especially value our authentic, homegrown cultural resources that set us apart from other areas of the state. Spokane Valley is the Iocation of several °Flrsts' to occur in the Spokane Region. The first permanent settler in the Spokane area was Antoine Plante, a retired French-Canadian trapper. Plante built a cabin near the Spokane River in 1849, from which he operated a small Hudson's Bay Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 21 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Company trading post. Plante also constructed and operated the first ferry on the Spokane River. Other settlers began arriving in this area between 1865 and 1882. "Firsts' to occur in Spokane Valley include the first settler in 1849, first business and feny in 1850, the first store and bridge in 1862, the first house in 1866 and the first post office in 1667. All of these `firsts" occurred before the arrival in 1873 of James Glover who was considered the 'Father of Spokane." A large part of Spokane Valley's identity is derived ftom its heritage. From the Native Americans who first established trading centers to the continuing waves of newcomers from around the worid, all have left their mark. Cultural resources include historic structures and landscapes engineered and built by man: a. Historic buildings - houses, bams, commercial buildings, churches, schools. b. Historic structures - bridges, dams, stone fenc;es. c. Historic districts - a grouping of buildings with related historic charecter. d. Historic objects - statues, monuments, sculpture. e. Landscapes — gardens, parks, urban and rural. Cuftural resources include properties that were held in spiritual or ceremonial honor or by a cuttural group or tribe. Cultural resources include properties which may no longer show evidence of man- made structures, but retain an historical association with an event or period. Archaeology sites include such areas as battlefields, campsites, cemeteries, bu�ial sites, rock carvings, pictographs, trails, village sites, fishing sites, trading sites, religious and ceremonial sites. 2.8.2 Cuttural and Historical Resource Issues Documenting Cultural Resources , Many historic homes, farms and sites exemplify the history and ��- •� ` culture of the Spokane Valley area, but proportionally few have been written in historic register nominations. Designation requires owner consent, does not pose undue restrictions to the property owner, and can be a planning tool for government by identifying sign�cant properties. ► �A �� ; .F,. ,:. . : >' -.' � Archaeological Sites and Security , }t �, ,� . il�i'y� State laws require the protection of archaeological sites on both '�- '� public and private land by directing that the locations of sites be �=; ��. -._,�_ • k e p t c o n f i d e n t i a l w i t h i n the assi gned office because �'`` I • �:�� archaeological sites are highly susceptible to "treasure hunters � �;,' and rave robbers." Existing lists need to be checked to confirm ,�_' -f �='�-'�' 9 . that evidence of the site/building remains, and a better means to -'�'� � .� identify and preserve evidence of significant archaeological sites ��: a=�' .� :_�, is needed. - Cuitural resources are deemed important when they are over 50 years old, so identification and evaluation of them is a constant, ongoing process. Moreover, cuitural resources are perceived as less important than other immediate, short-term City programs; therefore, funding and support for the preservation program is provided on an annual rather than an ongoing basis. 2.8.3 Spokane Valley Historic and Cultural Resources The Spokane Valley developed as irrigated agricuftural tracts in five and ten-acre lots. The apple orchards of �tis Orchards were supported by warehouses, packing plants, and box manufacturers. The apple industry which thrived in the early century was destroyed by killing frosi of the 1950s. Newman Lake supplied the water that irrigated these orchards via the Spokane Canal Company. The flow control gate at Newman Lake (a great fishing spot) remains as a ruin with its story only in fading memory. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 22 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Open canal ditches, concrete flues, cultivated fields and apple orchards were part of growing up in the valley until the late 1950s. A canal ran behind Otis Orchards High School, neither of which now exists. The picture on page 25 shows an 4tis Orchards irrigation canal. The Opportunity Township Hall was designed by Opportunity resident and noted Spokane architect C. Harvey Smith _ and constructed in 1912 by Opportunity - builder and businessman C.E. Johnson. ��, " Built as Opportunity's govemment seat, �� r , the Opportunity Township Hall also �, served as the area's community hall and -,- a meeting place for various philanthropic � - -�'��` � � and other organizations including the ,� - �, . ` � � � Opportuniry Moose Lodge, Boy Scouts, -- � Girt Scouts, church groups, dance f 1 � �'� studios, and we d ding pa rties. The � Opportunity Township Hall is significant i' as a rare local example af Spanish- Mediterranean style architecture and for its association with the early settlement and development of the Spokane Valley and the town of Opportunit�r. 2.9 The Land Use/Transaortation Connection 2.9.'I Street Connectivity Street design can have a significant impact on community development. It is important that neighborhoods be connected is such a manner that cars, bicycles and pedestrians can pass with ease from one neighborhood to an adjacent neighborhood via collectors and arterials. Such a pattem promotes a sense of community. All new developments should give special consideration to emergency access routes. 2.9.2 Traffic Calming Tra�c calming can be defined as measures that physically alter the operational characteristics of the roadway in an attempt to slow down traffic and reduce the negative effects of the automobile. The theory behind traffic calming is that roads should be muitiuse spaces encouraging social links within a community and the harmonious interaction of various modes of travel (i.e., walking, cycling, auto, transit). 2.10 Cltlzen Particfaation The City of Spokane Valley adopted a Public Participation Program for the preparation of the comprehensive plan. This program identrfied actions the city would take to meet the GMA requirements of 'early and continuous' public participation in the development of the city's plan. Two of the public participation techniques identfied in the Public Participation Program is citizen survey and a series of public meetings hosted by the cit�s planning commission. In the spring of 2004, the Cit�r hired Clearwater Research to conduct a statistically valid survey of Spokane Valley residents on a number of issues. Clearwater Research conducted a telephone survey with a random sample of 400 Spokane Valley adults. Survey data was collected from March 18 to April 7, 2004. The majority of respondents (83°�) indicated they thought Spokane Valley was headed in the right direction. However, respondents did identify a number of important issues facing Spokane Valley. Concems about the economy and planning related matters were among the top issues respondents identified as facing the City. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 23 of 36 City of Spokane Vailey Comprehensive Plan 2.10.1 City Center/Community tdentity Citv Center. Sixty-one percent of respondents indicated that having a recognizab{e downtown or city center was ��°� important to the future of Spokane Valley 8 �� ■ n=395 (figure right). Female respondents, respondents at lower income levels, and gp°,� respondents residing in one or two �� person households were most likely to 40°� report that having a recognizable 200 17� � downtown was important to the future of Spokane Valley. There was strong 0% support among r�espondents for spending very so�wt►� N�u� s«t,ewr,� very public money to create a city center_ �orta„� u,,;m�onan� �,orta,,, �«c�,c Seventy-four percent of respondents either somewhat or strongly supported Spokane Valley o�cials using public money to develop a city center. Only two percent strongly opposed the use of � 1ef 5�,� public money to create a city center ■ n=233 Most Ideal Location for a City Center Everygrean and Sprague 1 � Over half of the respondents (52°!0) felt Pines and Sprague � 15X the University City area would be the most ideal Spokane Valley location for a Ntira6eau Point leyi city center. Other areas considered appropriate for the City Center included University City area 52 Mirabeau Polnt, Pines and Sprague, and Evergreen and Sprague. 0% 20 40 60°�b 80% 100% Importance of Spokane Valley Having Community Identlty Communitv Identitv. Only 26% of respondents thought Spokane Valley had 100'/0 a distinct identity or something that made ■ 11 =396 it unique. Interestingly, almost the same � percentage of respondents who said � Spokane Valley doe�s not have a 41 � �� community identity (74l0), indicated that 40� having a community identity was important to the future of Spokane Valley 200� (76°�). 0°� Very Somtwhat Neutra) Some�what llery tx�irt�portant wdmpartar�t knportard ttnpatant Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 24 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Development of Community identity Best Accomplished Through ��° Physical or Soclal Changes g�o�o ■ n=288 While many respondents (47%) feit gpo� community identity could be developed ° through social changes, others 40 % o believed physical changes (28%) or a 20 0� 0 combination of both physical and social changes (25%) were the best 0% means fOf accomplishing the Physlcal changes Soclal changcs Both Important development of community identity. 2.10.2 Community Aesthetics The typical pattern of development along the major streets of Spokane Valley did not appear to be of great concem to respondents. Just 22% expressed dissatisfaction with the current type of development along major streets. Further underscoring the general lack of concem about the typical pattern of development along major streets, only 23% of respondents indicated adding street trees and landscaping to major streets should be a high priority for City officials. Lower income respondents were more apt than higher income respondents to report that making streets pedestrian-friendly should be a high priority for City officials. SuppottlOppositlon to Development of Small Commercial Centers Close to Residential Nelghborhoods Respondents' opinions (graph right) 100% regarding the development of small gp% ■ n =396 commercial centers close to residential neighborhoods, were also 60% sharpfy divided. Just under haif of the respondents (46%) were supportive 40��0 2�% �� of developing small commercial 20% 15 �6 centers close to residential neighborhoods. 0% Strongty Somewhat Neutral Somewfint Strongly oppose oppose support s�port Priority Level: Stronger Controls on Signs and Billboards ln Spokane Valley Opinions regarding the priority City officials should place on stronger sign 100% and billboard controls were very o ■ n =398 mixed. However, 67% of respondents $� /� indicated that Spokane Valley officials sp% should place a medium or high o priority on stronger sign and billboard 40 ,� 0 33°�6 �� 33% control and as such, it is probable that the majority of residents would be 20% _ supportive of stronger billboard control and sign regulations. p% Low priorlty Medlum prlorlty Nlgh priority 2.10.3 Results of "Unscientific" Survey During the community meetings held on the comprehensive plan, city staff made available the survey questions contained in the city's community survey. Meeting attendees were asked to complete the survey and either retum it before the end of the meeting, or to complete the suroey at Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 25 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Pian home and mail it to the city. In many cases the responses to the questions were similar to the responses of the formal survey conducted by Clearwater Research. These question numbers are right of the survey itse�f. The following are the results of the 'unscientific' survey: How important to the future of Spokane Valley ts having an area of the City that is recognl2ed es the "downtown"? Would you say...? The responses to this question _ are very similar to those received i�� during the formal community ■ n=177 survey. The results above reflect � that out of the total responses of 177 on this issue, 102 or nearly �°� 58 percent felt that Spokane �� _ 33•�G __ Valley having an identifiable 2s°�o � 19X downtown or city center was � - -- either sornewhat important or ' 4 �'� very important. This is compared a � to 40 responses or 22% indicating very somewnat Neither somewnat very that an identfiable city center was important Impo�tant import�nt unlmportant unlmportant either somewfiat or very � nor unimportant. unimportant If you feel a devetoping a"downtown" is important, whlch of the following areas of Spokane Valley would be the most ideal location for a downtown? Those respondents who indicated that having an identifiable city center overwhelming (?3%) felt that the University City area was the most appropriate location for establishing a city center for Spokane Valley. _ 9° � 1 4°/fl 10°� , 4% 73�6 ■ Unlvers�ty City area ■ Mirabeau Point area o Pines & 3prague o Eve 8 Sprag ■ Oth Adopted April 25, 200fi (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use Page 26 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan In your opinion� does Spokane Valley have an identity or something that makes It unique? The resuit of this survey question is somewhat different from the results of the formal community survey. In the formal survey only 26% of the respondents fett that the City of Spokane Valley has an identityr or something that makes it unique. The results in the graph at the right indicate that a majority of those surveyed at the community meetings (52%) feft there was something unique about Spokane Valley. � _, 100% ■ n=170 ao°� 60°� -- 39% 34 � - - - 13°k 20% 50� 9% 0% � Very Somewhat Nelther Somewhat Very important important important nor unimportant unimportant unimp How important to the future of Spokane Valley is having a"community Identlty? Would you say...? When asked how important to the future of �oa•ti Spokane Valley is having a distinct ■ n=155 community identity, an overwhelming �X majority of the respondents (73%) felt it is , either somewhat important or very important 60 '� �s•,c a2',c that Spokane Valley have a distinct identity. � This is consistent with the results of the formal community survey where 76% of �°� — — respondents felt it is important for the city to have a community identity. °% No Yes Would developmeni of a"community Identity" best be accompllshed through physical changes, such as the development of a city center or the building of gateways at the maJor points of entry into the city, or through soclal changes� such as more community events like Val leyfest? � �� . When asked what types of changes � ■ n=�so would be needed to develop a community '� identity, a majority (57%) felt that both sa ,� �°ti social and physical changes would be necessary to accomplish developing an �ox identity for the city. This is somewhat ��,,� 28x different than the formal survey where � — only 26% of the respondents felt that both o •,� physical and social changes were equally Pfiyslul Chany�s Soc�al Chanpes Both Changes impo�tant to develop the city's identity. �"'��y �""P°'�"` Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 27 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Pian Do you conslder adding street trees and landscaping to maJor streets In Spokane Valley a high, medium� or low priority for city officials? In terms of community aesthetics, a majority of the respondents (59%) fett �oo�c that adding street trees and • �°�s landscaping to the major streets in �' the c'�ty shouid be either a medium or � high priority for cit�r officials. This 4�x 4�x result was identical to the resutt of the � — - city's formal community survey where 18 �� _ 59% of respondents felt this shouid � be either a medium or high priority for � oX �h@ Clty. Law P�iorfty Medlum P�iority Hlgh PNority I 2.11 Goals and Policles Resldential Goals 8� Policfes Goal LUG-1 Preserve and protect the character of Spokane Valley's residential neighborhoods. Policies LUP-1.1 Maintain and protect the character of existing and future residential neighborhoods through the development and enforcement of the Cit�s land use regulations and joint planning. LUP-1.2 Protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent non-residential uses and/or higher intensity uses through the development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations and joint planning. LUP-1.3 Review and revise as necessary, existing land use regulations to provide for innovation and flexibility in the design of new residential developments, accessory dwelling units and in-�ill development. LUP-1.4 Encourage the development of transportation routes and facilities to serve residential neighborhoods. Special attention should be given to pedestrian circulation. LUP-1.5 Encourage the development of parks and the dedication of open space in and adjacent to residential areas. Open space dedication shall be proportionate to the size of the development. LUP-1.6 Preserve site characteristics that enhance residential development (trees, bodies of water, vistas, and simiiar features) using site planning techniques such as clustering, planned unit developments, transfer of development rights and lot size averaging. LUP-1.7 Allow zone changes within the Low Density Residential category only when spec�c criteria are met. Criteria may include: • Substantial changes within zone change area. • Clear mapping errors. • Adequate facilities and services (e.g. sewer, water capacity). � Consistency with densities in the vicinity of the zone change. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 28 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Goal LUG-2 Encourage a wide range of housing types and densities commensurate with the community's needs and preferences. Policies LUP-2.1 Allow and encourage a variety of housing types in designated Mixed-use areas, especialiy in the City Center area. LUP-2.2 Use design and performance standards for residential developments to achieve integration in commercial and Mixed-use developments. Performance standards should focus on scale, appearance, and compatibility. Encourage variations in facades and rooflines to add character and interest to multi-family developments. LUP-2.3 Encourage the development of transportation routes and facilities to serve residential neighborhoods. Special attention should be given to walking, biking and transit uses. LUP-2.4 Residential development should be designed to provide privacy and common open space. Open space areas shall be proportionate to the size of the residential development. LUP-2.5 Consider special development techniques (e.g., zero lot lines, lot size averaging, and planned unit developments) in single-family areas, provided they resutt in residential development consistent with the quality and character of existing neighborhoods. Commercial Goals � Pollcies Goal LUG-3 Transform various commercial buslness areas Into vital, attractive, easily accesslble mlxed use areas that appeal to investors, consumers and residents and enhance the community image and economic vitality. Policies LUP-3.1 Encourage transformation of Sprague Avenue RegionaV Community Commercial corridor into a quality mixed-use retail area. Retail development along the comdor, exclusive of the City Center, should be concentrated at arterial intersections and designed to integrate auto, pedestrian, and transit circulation. Integration of public amenities and open space into retail and office development should also be encouraged. LUP-3.2 Encourage large bulk retailers to locate in the designated Regional Commercial nodes around arterial intersections. Goal LUG-4 Provide nefghborhood and community scale retail centers for the City's neighborhoods. Policies LUP-4.1 Integrate retail developments into surrounding residential areas with attention to quality design and function. LUP-4.2 Encourage pedestrian and bicycle access to neighborhood shopping and senrices. LUP-4.3 Encourage retail and personal services to group together within planned centers to allow for ease of pedestrian movement. LUP-4.4 Encourage Mixed-use residential and commercial and office development in Neighborhood Commercial designations where compatibility with nearby uses can be demonstrated. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 29 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan LUP�4.5 Ensure compatibility between mixed-use developments and residential areas by regulating height, scale, setbacks, and buffers. LUP-4.6 Develop community design guidelines to promote common open space, public art, and plazas in commercial and office developments. LUP-4.7 Develop design guidelines that encourage quality design and pedestrian and vehicte circulation in commercial, office and Mixed-use developments. LUP-4.8 Develop design guidelines to encourage commercial deve{opment to locate along the street edge (where deemed approp�iate) to provide pedestrian street access. LUP-4.9 Identify and designate streets where on-street parking can be safety provided without unduly slowing traffic flow or jeopardizing traffic safety. LUP�.10 May provide incentives to encourage developers to include housing in mixed-use projects. Goal LUG-5 Identify appropriate locations for the Auto Row Overlay designation. Policies LUP-5.1 Identify other appropriate automobile related uses within the Auto Row Overlay designation that are complementary to automobile dealerships. LUP-5.2 Develop appropriate development standards for permftted uses within the Auto Row Overlay designated area. City Center Goal LUG-6 Create an Identifiable City Center that serves as the social, cultu�al, and economic focus of the City of Spokane Valtey. Policies LUP-6.1 Define a City Center with distinct boundaries, unique building types, and special features. LUP-6.2 Strengthen existing connections of the City Center area to the region's high capacity transit system. LUP-6.3 Focus on improving the existing character and image of the Cityr Center area through appropriate development regulations and design standards. LUP-6.4 Develop land use regulations that allow higher intensity development in the City Center including, but not limited to, taller buildings, increased floor area ratios (FAR) end permitted uses_ LUP-6.5 Coordinate with urban service providers to ensure sufficient capacity is available for anticipated development. LUP-6.6 Allow for a variety of uses and maed-use development within buildings or complexes. Ensure that mixed-use development complements and enhances the character of the surrounding residential and commercial area. LUP-6.7 The City should always consider City Center sites regarding potential civic and cuitural uses the Cit�r devetops, such as a City Hall. LUP-6.8 Provide incentives to attract cuitural and civic uses to the City Center over which the City does not have direct control, such as libraries or recreation facilities. LUP-6.9 Develop land use regulations that encourage higher density residential uses on the periphery of the City Center area in close proximity to high capacity transit. High density housing should be accompanied by residentially oriented retail and service uses. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 30 of 3fi City of Spokane Valiey Comprehensive Plan LUP-6.10 Provide amenities such as community services, parks and public spaces to meet the residential needs in the City Center. LUP-fi.11 Provide an effective transition between the periphery of the City Center and nearby lower density residential development. Goal LUG-7 Provlde a balanced transportation network that accommodates public transportation, high occupancy vehtcles, pedestrlans, bicyclists, automoblles and fntegrated parking. Policies LUP-7.1 Improve traffic circulation around and through the City Center by extending the street network and creating smaller blocks. LUP-7.2 Encourage pedestrian and bicycle circulation by providing public sidewalks, street trees, street furniture and other amenities. LUP-7.3 Require clear and safe pedestrian paths to enhance the pedestrian network. LUP-7.4 Connect the main entry of buildings to public sidewalks by an identifiable walkway. LUP-7.5 Allow for on-street parking on the intemal City Center street network. LUP-7.6 Encourage transit use by improving pedestrian and bicycle linkages to the existing and future transit system. Office Goals 8� Policies Goal LUG-S Create appropriate development standards for Office designated areas. Policies LUP-8.1 Allow commercial, residential and recreational uses in conjunction with permitted uses in Office designated areas. LUP-8.2 Integrate sidewalks, bike lanes, landscaping, and area lighting in office areas to provide a safe and attractive woricing environment. Mixed-use Goals 8� Policles Goal LUG-9 Encourage the development of Mixed-use areas that foster community identity and are designed to support pedestrian, bicycle and reglonal transit. Policies LUP-9.1 The characteristics of a Mixed-use area should include: • Housing and employment densities to support regional transit service; • Public transit connections; • Safe, attractive transit stops and pedestrian and bicycle ways; • Buildings that front on wide sidewalks with attractive landscaping, benches and frequent bus stops; • Multi-story buildings oriented to the str�eet rather than parking lots; and • Parking space located behind or to the side of buildings or in parking structures. Adopted April 25, 200fi (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 31 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Pian LUP-9.2 The mix of tand uses allowed in either the Corridor Mixed-use or Mixed-use Center designation should include: • A variety of housing types including apartments, condominiums, town houses, two-family and single family dwellings on small lots; • A full range of retail goods and services including grocery stores, theaters/entertainment, restaurants, personal services and speciatty shops; • Publiclquasi-public uses and/or open space; • Professional Office and other employment oriented uses; and • Commercial uses that require large land areas but have low employment density and are auto-dependant, such as lumber yards, plant nurseries, warehouses, and auto dealerships, should be prohibited from either Mbced- use category. Industrial Goals 8� Pollcles Goal LUG-10 Provide for the development of well-planned industrial areas and ensure the long-term holding of appropriate land in parcel sizes adequate to atlow for future development as industrlal uses. Policies LUP-10.1 Plan capital facility expenditures to assist the development of lands designated for industrial uses. LUP-10.2 Encourage e dive�se array of industries to locate in Spokane Valley. LUP-10.3 Encourage shared-use parking, pedestrian access and transit incentive programs in industrial development projects. Goal LUG-11 A variety of strategically located heavy (ndustrial areas should be designated and protected from conflicting land uses. Policies LUP-11.1 Commercial, residential and recreational uses should be limited or not allowed in areas designated for industry, except for small-scale ancillary commercial and recreational uses intended to primarily serve the industrial area. LUP-11.2 Conversion of designated industrial lands to other uses should be strictly limited to ensure an adequate land suppty. LUP-11.3 Provide appropriate buffering, landscaping and other development standards for industrial areas. LUP-11.4 Retail outlets shall be allowed for industrial businesses that manufacture andlor assemble products on-site. Goal LUG-12 Designate and protect a variety of strategically located light industry areas. Policies LUP-12.1 Commercial, residential and recreational uses shall be limited or not allowed in areas designated for light industry except for small-scale ancillary commercial and recreational uses primarily to serve the industrial area. LUP-12.2 Light industry areas shall include lighting, sidewalks, bike lanes and landscaping to provide a safe and attractive worlcing environment. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 32 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan LUP-12.3 Retail outlets shail be allowed for industrial businesses that manufacture and/or assemble products on-site. Development Review Goals 8� Policies Goal LUG-13 Develop and malntain an efficient and timely development review process. Policies LUP-13.1 Maximize efficiency of the development review process by continuously evaluating the permitting process and modifying as appropriate. LUP-13.2 Assist developers with proposals by continuing to offer pre-application meetings in order to produce projects that will be reviewed efficiently. Urban Deslgn and Form Goals 8� Pollcles Goals LUG-14 Improve the appearance and function of the built environment. Policies LUP-14.1 Use performance and community design standards to maintain neighborhood character, achieve a greater range of housing options, and to create attractive and desirable commercial and office developments. LUP-14.2 Adopt specific regulations for designated aesthetic corridors that: • Provide incentives for aesthetic design; • Require landscaping buffers adjacent to roadways; • Limit sign height and size; • Provide performance standards to adequately screen intensive land uses that have exterior clutter such as outdoor storage, exterior heavy equipment and/or exterior fabricatioNassembly. • Prohibit off-premise signage and billboards. LUP-14.3 Establish standards for the scale and intensity of commercial, retail and industrial signage that protect views and minimize signage clutter while allowing adequate business identification. LUP-14.4 Establish a°cap and replace' system for billboards. LUP-14,5 Designate aesthetic corridors along major transportation routes to provide a positive image of Spokane Valley. Aesthetic corridors shall be located along the following routes: • State Route 27 from 16�' south to 32" and Mansfield to Trent; • Appleway Boulevard (south side from Park to Dishman Mica); • Mirabeau Paricway from Pines to Indiana; • Dishman Mica Road from 8�' Avenue, south to City limits � 32"� Ave. within the City limits • Appleway 61vd. from Barker to Hodges Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 33 of 36 City of Spokane Vailey Comprahensive Plan Historic and Cultural Resources Goais 8� Policies Goai LUG-16 Identify and protect archeological and historic sites and structures. Policies LUP-15.1 Continually identify and evaluate archaeological and historic sites to determine which should be preserved. LUP-15.2 Link cuttural resource preservation with local economic development strategies. LUP-15.3 Establish and maintain relations with Native American tribes for the presenration of erchaeological sites and traditional cultural properties. Land UselTransportatlon Connection Goals 8� Policies Goal LU�-16 Provide a street aystern that connects neighborhoods. Policies LUP-16.1 Encourage new developments, including multifamily projects, to be arranged in a pattern of connecting streets and blocks to allow people to get around easily by foot, bicycle, bus or car. LUP-16.2 Develop street, pedestrian path and bike path standards that contribute to a system of fully connected routes. LUP-16.3 Require adequate emergency evacuation routes prior to approving new development or redevelopment. Joint Planning Goals and Policies Goal LUG-17 The City of Spokane Valley should contlnue to coordinate with Spokane County and neighboring cities for adjacent urban growth areas. Policies LUP-17.1 The City should coordinate with Spokane County to ensure appropriate service provision and land development prior to City annexation. Methods to allow for coordination may include, but are not limited to, execution of an interlocal agreement between the City of Spokane Valley end Spokane County to: • Establish guidelines for development plan review, impact fees and SEPA mitigation; and • Define service delivery responsibilities, level of service standards and capital facility implementation consistent with the goals and policies of this Plan. LUP-17.2 Through regional planning efforts, the City and Counry should ensure that planning is compatible with the Cities of Spokane and Liberty Lake. LUP-17.3 The City should continue coordinated planning efforts between Spokane County, appropriate fire districts, school districts and water service providers to assure managed growth in urban growth areas. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 34 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Potential Annexation Area Goals and Policies Goal LUG-18 Identify Potential Annexation Areas for the City of Spokane Valiey that are consistent with the Spokane County regtonal urban growth area boundary. Policies LUP-18.1 Within the existing urban growth area, identify potential annexation areas that are contiguous to the city limits and not assigned to another city. LUP-18.2 Coordinate with adjacent cities and Spokane County to review and update the regional urban growth area boundary consistent with the Countywide Planning Policies and RCW 36.70. LUP-18.3 Propose changes to the regional urban growth area boundary necessary to accommodate Spokane Valley's 20 year population allocation. LUP-18.4 The City will not accept requests to annex unincorporated territory located outside the designated urban growth area. �� r 1 � � . � �L�- � � � �. ; � ._ -t� t,lfi - Y-__.- i%v� '.i� •'L._f.':C� flEf��--iNfi�f � LUP-18.�5 Complete necessary capital facilities planning for any newly proposed urban growth areas in accordance with the Countywide Planning Policies. Goal LUG-19 Collaborate with adiacent cities, Saokane Countv, and affected residents Policies LUP-19.1 Pursue interlocal aQreements with Saokane County to supaort collaborative ioint planninq within ootential annexation areas to ensure consistent develonment. LUP-19.2 Infonn affected residents. �roperty owners. and businesses in the annexation rp ocess. LUP-19.3 Include lanQuaQe in an interlocal aQreement utilizing the tool of annexation, prior to urban development. to control the type, quality, and location of development in gotential ennexetion areas. LUP-19.4 Coordinate with Spokane Countv to work with affected neiqhborhoods upon �nnexation to arovide a smooth transition from Spokane County to the Citv of Spokane Vallev administration. Goal LUG-2Q P�omote orderlv s�rowth wfthln aotential annexatton areas Policies LUP-20.1 Perform a fiscal analysis and arovide a service �lan for all areas qr000sed for annexation �up-20.2 Incorporete potential annexation areas in the Capital Facilities Plan includinq proposed locations for new c�pital facilities. LUP-20.3 Strive to retain neighborhood integritv in adjustinQ potential annexation areas boundaries Adopted April 25, 200fi (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter Z— Land Use Page 35 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Goal LUG-21 Develoa an annexation process for potential annexation areas Policies LUP-21 1 Evaluate annexations within the potentia) annexation areas bas�d on the following criteria: • The Citv's abil�tv. either in house. bv contract. or by special �ur�ose districi, to arovide oublic services at the City's adooted level of service • The annexation baundery should provide a contiguous and re4ular boundarv with cunent City limits • The annexation boundary, where aQaropriate should use ohysical boundaries, in�ludin� but not limited to, bodies of water, existina or future �,aht, -0f-wav, roads. and toaoaraahv • Assessment of staff time and expense involved in processinQ the annexation reauest • Review riqht-of-wav issues prior to defining boundaries of individual �nnexations to determine (oqical inclusions or exclusions • The annexation boundarv, where appropriate, should adiust any impractical or irregular boundaries • When the proposed annexation is locafed in the vicinitv of a public_facilitY. th� Citv should evaluate the feasibility of modifv�� the annexa boundar�r to include the public facilitv LUP-21.2 Process ennexations in �ccordance tivitf� St�t� annexation laws in a tirnelY and efficient manner LUP-21 3 Generallv the CitY of Spokane Valley pref?rs the Petition Methcd o� Annexa;ion. LUP-21.4 Ensure that newly annexed territorv accepts its equitable share of the Citv's bonded indebtedness Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 36 of 36 Public/Quasi-Public Analysis Section No. CP Desi nation Subse uent Zonin WS-1 Low Dens� Residential SF Residential District R-3 WS-2 Low Densi Residential SF Residential Urban District R-4 WS-3 Medium Densi Residential Multifamil Medium Densi Res�dential District MF-1 WS-4 Hi h Densi Residential Multifamil Hi h Dens' Residential District MF-2 WS-5 Commun' Commercial Commun' Commercial District C WS-6 Re ional Commercial Re ional Commercial RC WS-7 Parks and O en S ace Parks and O en S ace (P/OS Section No. CP Desi nation Subs uent Zonin WN-1 Hea Industrial Hea Industrial I-2 WN-2 Re ional Commercial Re ional Commercial RC WN-3 Low Dens' Residential SF Residential District R-3 WN-� Low Densi Residential SF Residential Urban District R-4 WN-5 Office Office O WN-6 Office Garden Office GO VVN-7 Li ht Industrial Li ht Industrial I-1 WN-8 Low Densi Residential SF Residential Suburban District R-2 WN-9 Parks and O en S ace Parks and O en S ace PlOS Section No. CP Desf nation Subse uent Zonin WCS-1 Low Dens' Residential SF Residential Estate District R-1 WCS-2 Low Dens' Residential SF Residential Suburban District R-2 WCS-3 Low Dens' Residential SF Residential District R-3 WCS-4 Communit Commercial Communi Commercial District C WCS-5 Nei hborhood Commercial Nei hborhood Commercial NC WCS-6 Parks and O en S ace Parks and O en S ace P/OS Section No. CP Desl natlon Subse uent Zonin WC-1 Low Densi Residential SF Residential Suburban District R-2 WC-2 Low Densi Residential SF Residential District R-3 WC-3 Corridor Mixed Use Corridor Mixed Use CMU WC-4 Hi h Densi Residential Multifamil Hi h Densi Residential District MF-2 Section No. CP Desi nation Subse uent Zonin WCN-1 Corridor Mixed Use Corridor Mixed Use CMU WCN-2 Medium Densi Residential Multifamil Medium Densi Residential District MF-1 WCN-3 O�ce Office O WCN-4 Commun' Commercial Communi Commercial District C WCN-5 Li ht Industrial Li ht Industrial I-1 WCN-6 Hi h Dens' Residential Multifamil Hi h Densi Residential District MF-2 WCN-7 Low Densit Residential SF Residential District R-3 WCN-8 Mixed Use Center Mixed Use Center District MUC) WCN-9 Parlcs and O en S ace Parks and O en S ace P/OS 1 of 2 Public/Quasi-Public Analysis Section No. CP Desi nation Subse uent Zonin ECN-1 Mixed Use Center Mixed Use Center District MUC ECN-2 Hi h Dens' Residential Muttifamil Hi h Densit Residential District (MF-2 ECN-3 Parks and O en S ace Parks and O en S ace P/OS ECN-4 Hea Industrial Hea Industrial I-2 ECN-5 Low Densit Residential SF Residential District R-3 ECN-6 Low Dens' Residential SF Residential Urban District R-4 Sectlon No. CP Desi nation Subse uent Zonin EC-1 Corridor Mixed Use Corridor Mixed Use CMU) EC-2 Offiice Garden Office GO EC-3 Hi h Densi Residential Multifamil Hi h Densi Residential District MF-2 EC-4 Low Dens' Residential SF Residential District R-3 EG5 Office Office (O EC-6 Re ional Commercial R ional Commercial RC Section No. CP Desi nation Subse uent tonin ECS-1 Low Densit Residential SF Residential Suburban District R-2 ECS-2 Parks and O en S ace Parks and Open S ace P/OS ECS-3 Low Dens' Residential SF Residential District R-3 ECS-4 Hi h Densi Residential Multifamil Hi h Dens' Residential District MF-2 ECS-5 Comdor Mixed Use Corridor Mixed Use CMU ECS-6 Medium Densit Residential Multifamil Medium Dens' Residential District (MF-1 Section No. CP Desi nation Subse uent Zonln ES-1 Low Densi Residential SF Residential Suburban District R-2 ES-2 Low Densi Residential SF Residential Urban District R-4 ES-3 Low Densi Residential SF Residential Estate District R-1 ES-4 Lvw Dens' Residential SF Residential District R-3 ES-5 Communit Commercial Communi Commercial District C ES-6 Medium Densi Residential Multrfamil Medium Densi Residential District MF-1 ES-7 Corridor Mixed Use Corridor Mixed Use CMU ES-8 Office Garden Office GO Section No. CP Desi natlon Subse uent Zonin EN-1 Parlcs end O en S ace Parks and O en S ace P/OS EN-2 Medium Densit Residential Multifamil Medium Dens' Residential District MF-1 EN-3 Low Dens' Residential SF Residential District R-3 EN-4 Low Dens' Residential SF Residential Urban District R-4 EN-5 Hea Industrial Hea Industrial I-2 EN-6 Li ht Industrial Li ht Industrial I-1 2 0� 2 PubliclQuasi-Public Property � � } � -��: �� -a . , — � . _ , � .� , ,-�►- ,. ` � T�� s�an 6aMaN� ��;� � � � s�..�. � r �� E�I�st �VOrth r � - st Cent , � � ,+� = �a ~ I � i ! � — � '�' - � J' �"� _ � a , : , — � � � _ ,� � ��.,�-_ , ' ` - e. � C •� i ` v �IIITst-C�ntra�T f�16Rrr ' , -� A! N �.-`- f '� .�._ ,+ N f _�___ � . f ' � , - = i � f .,�_ I _ _ 1 _ _ — _ F , , - _ � ,l.f •� _� �-- ; � ` -"... !1_ � I �! .--, . " � � - ' — � — � . r �r �` _ � _ * � `�__ ' � _� 1 • j� W�/ — - '� : _ �� ` �� _a_ ' _ ,�..�- ti��- � ._ r �rl — w . �- - -- � -.� ` . � � F�.. - _ � _ tr t �" ;_. � r,� � TS �.. r � K� � 1 � � � � t f � - '- v. � � i \ '�_ +.� I �- - �� i_ � � -- � � �` 1 _ '� �� l_1... �� j ♦�yY , I — • AL — ��_ 1 1 H -� 1 �. T — — ,,' " . � �.r� �� 1`" ` � . i �: / � � T � `,�� -, 1 1 1 � � C �_ �� _ �, . __�11ve � e' I Valfey I _ I � �' W Y��bYWaY�- 1 ',� .! V�1�1s�wq- Nlxon �, �� MA atrl � 4' � -�_ __;___ ,� . IRlvers( J _ g �� -- �. � fi� t�� t��t ��f� i��s��f1�NRi�r�i�� i��ti�� {�b��.��■ �� •�� t�r�MS�r��i��!t�• � ' � t_. � , ,, : ; �.,1 sc' ��•� � i�+ ' � :.�nd- --- - — - � - l � "�. � �nd ws- �� -- - Ao 1ic� • � ! � , � -�— a S� ��_� - _ - _� f �� . � �. �_� -- �� HDR_" _�_ _: rin RC - µ _ �-�_- _ _ -.-- _ - � � 4 3h�J'``L— _. 4 - � Y � � t � r •t I �II�Ir `_ +�tj� � --� �,� � 1 � Sth : -- S_� � � d' Ora1I� 1 � th , �P�OS�4 �_ c �Pq1_��I _ I � � 1 � � !� e�. ��a�'''�— —�� - � Legend �-- - � ° _�th_ . `� i � �_ �._ a— t�,� �� WSPQP . � _ � � WS-1 _ r �. = W S= 2 �- L D R �,, �+ MD� I'L PaP1D � � � . ws-� � � LDR ltth _ „ �� :� �- ws.z �� `� ' , ��.��.■.��..� , � � - � _ .��. � —�-- r ' � t � ` .-� � � - � � J � �, � � � 4 � � � _ �� = � /�/M'�1 � YVS-rJ '�,i _ `�` S � �� _ 11 f I� �,� r � _ WS•6 =/�*tf�� 1%/ /111 s 16�f ` � , � � - WS-7 I� � � � � � � � �sy� lath ___l� � � � � = ,� �� ` '� � �� , 1//�Il'�'� : �r �' � ��a 1�i��/�II��i/��L � � M��w,� � .' $6 _ ` � F�s �� -- - — �� - — Y9� , qlki l �O�ivu : � � � � � � ' ' �' � - � eilvywa,�� _ / � Valleyway i_ _ . �� - _ } , ��'�; �� Nixon �. � � _ - -- - - - ` ; - ` �'� ' Maln_ r H...,�,_.�_ �-- - -.� m ; i � � _� . _ _ � Rtverslde - c _ � ro � � - �- -- -- __�.^--- � �r�nl tt�n ttrtt� �it�rtjt�4fi9Y4i�r��ese�i��i�i�e��a�e�r��i�� i�,��f�r��■ t� ir��r r��l��t��r*r�r��*�itt • � �at - I , ' �_ o se ..;.. � � M ��.T . --- _ � �� - - - -a - �- � -- - ; � . � � ws-s �- ��=� �3C1d� _ Y i �9�� _ 2nd_._ - �: �5-4- - _*+ A�� 7�t� �- = y - - �ws-s ' 0 ��,� i so� �' �90 a ,a+ i��' � C I M F-2_ _srd ---- �.�� RC - -- wza 5 o N — _ . �► = �, �----1-- I .-�., �,� - �.�r �– _�_�o ------; a�t,_ _.;�� -_ _ s�i�- ^ - — • _ - — I � �� _ _ 4:t1_ 1� �a. � � � r � Sth : � � '�—�, _� ; � _ 5th �' - �� I I r ' �` _�ar�� _ � 6th 1 �- — . s�n. �P/OS�L Legend � v \,Polfi �� +� ,' _�q � , ��; WSPQP i�-- � � _ . � �� '� � — _ . . - —� � _ - � � �e �� PQPID � c =`--� I _ _ �._ WS=3 �L � WS-1 _ WS-2 �° WS-1 �� c� MF-11?ac'r, �'t' =� ws-2 � �• �" : R'� � R•3 �� tn_ — � _ � � � (�– _1 ws-� � _ �l� , 2► � it - WS-�t � T--- � - �tt��r��lt��1t�It ' � �� i ��`� � � vvs-s - � , 4 c ��' � � � 4� � ` _ �� `�. �� J� � ��— = i --- . �M� - � �''h a - WS-6 �` �' a ,�r� _ � ��r � ,'� � � _�� '��o - WS-7 ! � � � •��° �/��ft�fft tt��1�� L � r � � � �' � c �ey Iw °. 1 � = � ° �N,-h- � n�n � c � � m �� O y � / / i �� r �` ��_� r `, � p tt /�t��1��/��/�1��1� �-�—y' � � �4�:•~4�r L�gend �� t �� u - WNPQP ��'' � � �� : wN-8 �+o y� `' k � :LDR � �., • . . � - - `""'� � � � � � 0 �•� � � i � ��M -- .�- ♦t � l .---` _ �- � � r, �� sde _-� �.s� _. - •��, �� ♦� � - � e ,`''�� f � - N GnIl1i = - ��.�►�;" � � Morr�qgm• - , � � � �.� �_ _ _Nan.� . Id � N M� �� wrt.� nox � `- � '.y'�� _o _ -�- . � � �� _ � f � - — - wr+ 9 � __.�_ _ I � � n - , a� Ichl�� .- : � � ,�, _�—..� Tla�t� - �dti� � ; �� t 90 � 9 _ � _._.& . � I ' � � � - -�� - N `�1 �.W_1��' _ . - ., WN-7 - � _ _. ` � - � � Mh�lon �sa10 � .. ` � r � , , ;,: o - a L-I-,� ,----� - � a •!��"� I $' � k+co .� � - � n �� o m � ' � �� — °� I,�oon� ��-�" u._ Sharv i � � ; _ ,�� - � - �:�t� � '�" � � N-5 � + ° ' �,-� L� � � � I � WN-� � al� N �LQ1�#n ._ 1� FF� � b � O � .: 6___. - � �aw � – — M��_..? w� °� � P/OS � � - �� _ ,, _.. ,I (� 1 adway - �S � - — � • �l- �,:� : , _ �� .x � - � � F - � ` �°°�'� LDR _ Q =� ' � Aikl„ 0 - .� . , � � r N6 �--� �� _ _� . RC � "� '_ Vafl�ywe�,L ij�IXOt1 _fi � j„ra w NI�QfI � - - ,� .� _Maln- t � - � � I ~� �- — � � l �,Q/=fv�cstde� •, 3� �,,'� '�'��fl�on_ _ I .r I : ` . �;' " : �t�� t�1 i� ��//��1111��1/!/�/��i1��1�/�!ll��1l�If�j/R��1i1.U.l��l�NiSiM �!!/�1/t1�Itt#ft��j��/� - � at � ! ' �ti� , " ___1..__ ��.e�.�y _ � `' � _ - � - _�„ . - D!� � � --_..J�lL..._ i � ,-� - .sit�i9�t1t � z' o � W W - � Legend � � p � � wt�s� � ,� _ � --,� o n � n f �� WN.� r�z s � � � I _ k R-2 WNPQP �:� ' atn►i r:� � s-t �t � PQPiD �- I F3 " , - _ WN .�= . uck I �', l •!� - 8 a - ' - � - WN-2 ,,, �,��e�"� � � - ach n - � � � � ; ��*� - � �� ,�� , _� � �, � „>> �- - *t - '� -�`o�-DQntgome 0 `"" - � ...,: ;� .-- ,�, ,d 1 : �— _ Mansfr d \`�, �- � ' � • - VVt�1-5 � � _ �-. � .. . R ;' ' -� - - rs - �$ nox � � o g _ - - � I Q�. 8 ' _ .. � a; � 0 _ Ra 1Ch1 li�pol� � WN•T — m - -- _' Trortt � d��na � �--- � � .� u; ��'- �a1dw I .� a i � � 1� e�' , � �� , �� 9 � t � � tnn�-a „ o � W N-7 a � I ��z$rt_°! :- � _� 1 I ��r _-- : � �-9 .��' .__ _ - �' --- - j'� � _ ____�_`__�_�' � y ��' . : . � � €'� �a• _M �sto,n �4��=- - �„r ',t'' �� ` � - �, -� -- - — dil � m I ° : ��t _ ;I� �' � €' �� Slc� __. ` �� _ � � ° ' G = t m `� � 1— � 4 � - ''��>> � _ � _ _ � ._�ti ti_ Sharp �- .,. -- ��" � - ; �. ', .,�ti�' `i � Iv �� — �I � .. r ` • ��r' J �-- — - 8�� S.� � �s>>• i . , � �L -�►,DesmQt _�.._ _ - - t WN 'S�-a o , R-4 _ '-� ` � catnr o � I � : � caa�do_ _ _ p . • � � - WN-9- � �. � � �-. � N -1 b � - �-- � `� . � � �pF�:''.� �� !� � . o - � � -� 3,� iu�iton! W 2ag_ " �� ' �' P/OS = .o � �r 1=2 Bron E � - - - - - - I e�I �__�� w - v� � _ - � f '� ondwnyT% .._�_,� . - -V1/M_3_ _ �. " . °� i �; W 7 � F g �� d � ° ��4� -Ne�'� '� R�3 — Ik�— -- `c W,N 2 � Alkl �,� � - _!Otivo ti�� , � � � i WN-6 � � R C , - ` -.� . _ o '; � ,vane�wav I G� �' i- '� -- - ' � _ �;��,; `Nlxo� , w� � Ixo - ' � „,; M�in._ r� . -�:� - ��n. i �i « � (Rtvera_i_c10 5Q ' a --h� ! . � - - + 1.. ,� -�-._�,-`- � - -- �� .. -:... . A�ft�tt�t�l��t��[��P#99Y14��e�i��tlteitttUt��If.�,�t11��r��w��tfii�itEiti� t,M�t�r�t� :trr • --- ♦ _ �` . � � � � / \ Legend ' ' ' - — . Y : \ � � Y � � �� WC3PQP � ,� , I�, � z �„' , ,, � �� rOP'10 � .- � Q wcs� o� � � `�°_ � f �-° _ �� -� �- � �� WCS�2 ~� � � � �' � 1� ` 0'"`°r' �� .�� ' �CS- 32na_l._s. - � � � u � - � ''� � � ` ��_ � , 34th � 9 , �_ �� C �' � � � WCS-5 � ',. � � . �` =�� '.�/j c � - WC5-e � � \ 1. � 3 �� ' �/ �� -�-.. � � �� , � � � 0 � «�, � _i � C I � - I lQ�� • ' � � �� - � o `�� '�, - _ � � �� --- , .� � ,�,� , � c� �� 1�CS.�4 _4,st� ; Cs� � ; �� + � C y LDR � � �. r � 1•�I�� \ ��♦,` � � � �� • 1 � • M�t� � ° ��, � WCS-2 � ' � � LbR � �m � � E 4 � � 46tfi A � oc • 1~d1 SOUtf'1 � ' : �ti► 4Zth ; � .�� ' � ; � � ,- tit i• .� W H M, , s F � i .� wcs•s �,��,, _ _ �� + - - r � � > , �� r Hc �►�� -� _ � ''`� ' �. ` .� cs-�--,- _ � , _ �� 3i; '� LDR tral South 1 —. '2�a �� — Z��e��a� . w�w�.�� r�. ...� +�.-f �.�F �..s� . - -- � � ';� �25th � ` �— 2Sth on�n � �� s - � . � • � � °�! �+ : � > � � s N. `, �► : t� � °. �� .� , -', ��, . ' 29tlt � \ � � ! �c r4 �Q -- i _�� J � m I ' �' � (�� p V C I �: �., o �- : Legend • � �WCS� - � `'' � ��t��t� � —� NC � \, I I 1 •�. a � � WCSP�P � � , �r- ` J -��1— � 1--"_ �� PQPID � � ��IVC$-6�' c a ' ' �a� s � � �► � 3 0 �� 0 �.,�cs-� � �� f � � I ` � � �� _ � � i �..; ��cs-� 1\ � , ��,�? _ f� = � Q VVCS-3 �tf ,,2 �"""' ''�' « ' � �» � / � �'�/ '�' " � � � y ,� �-- �° �a ' � � �h� - W�' � � '' ). � �'i \ ' R , - -�1_. ' ' � �'a � 0 wcs-5 ;' ; �.� � `O�, Y.WCS-4 a� ' �INCS-3 � wCS_g - ci � �� - � � 'C R-3 j� . ` i `',--- '�,. ��,' , ♦' ��`7�'°y� � � ��' o �dra '' � � 4 Q. � ` - � ��r��'' _��, °' `� m , �'!43ro '� N WCS-2 � `� , � �/ N o , � ` ° �' � 1 2 = � � 44tn � ' _� � � E � O � �p AI : �- > � _..1 = _ �. � .. � !q A = � �� SL 47 �� J �� 1 – �,�� !� r �- � � � ar, .�,L t . t � ��ttft'�tt�t�t� e'�, No,m�rt� �i � � � r� � "`— m , s r + •• J � � � '.__ _ – .�� it� f � ` � ��,� � `+ 71 �'fIN� —' WC$-� 7r _ , �.� R-1 .; -, G • : ��nt� � ��i�� ,�� f�i-i�1//��/lH��llf •i�� `��ttl��/��11111/1��/�/I�t11�1�� --- -r � � ; � �� t- WC=3 r ---____.�LA ' � � �___ 3�'d.— � _. � m - � `• � � CMU�� _ �_ .4th . :, ,� ` -- ---- __ _ dth - _ -- t �c • � �ir `� r � _� j `�_ � �,+ s� � c � � \ J 3 ` � WC-4 .z � � a __. � I • \ _ H DR � _ 7_ch _ , r-- . � � 7th I � � � �� - ' '• I ►p�, 'n \ � _ .��Ir alh � �_$t , - � ' '7 t/ i/� �,� he N�l Bt � i • � ' � � Ntna \ e� � � i ` '\ o � "' 1 � ^ I �` WC-2 � � � � � ' � ! °�--- i$ � = ~'� � � l LDR �`` �� 3 - ` f '� 'S ' � 2ttL _ _� _ . � Zth :+ j i ` t � f � � � - -- � � , > ?� � '� a proy ` o $ : j — � � C � '" � '. 1�fh� - �o I � $� � !� - � , W�st Centra �e ` 7 ��t�� _ _ i�. ` _ i I � 1.7. � � . � , � Legend !,�� _ 4 _� W�CPQP : � �? � • � • -, Q PCP� ; � � �_ _ .� wGt � - � � W � � r� ti 1st— C �--�-f � ��/ — WC3 � � � . � � = ��► - Wc.s i � '� � -�d 22tt�_ % r WC- - \ J _nrd_ p� ; `��: o ', ; i Lp � _ -Rr� , an , ��tti��l��k7��t�t��/ 1�1�1�1 , � � , i I 1 I ` � � ��_��r�„�� r, -t � ►-�� fil��/l�l!l111I�/��I�IIIIIt11�M�//��1�1111111 ��,�� . �, , .. .�i •,r��'r�ll� il � -- — �rd--- ' p� l � 3M — , i \`� '� 6th 'CMU : � . . �� - : dfh _ _ " .'!,}� �` �' -- - . - - - - -- � .: , � � ;►.� 1 `� — - - � � � � � • i' �, ` , � � Sth 'a� . � � f � � `� nM � c .:� � r --� ct � Oth a I � - =.\ I�� th W C -4 � ath — —�' : Ttit — �� \� � M-2 I •-�-_ � � '� � Tth z l e, � � �^, .. - - ,$ �" � �. ath `Yt//i 6th � �' - �th � -�— : atchery� `� 3 � - _ . : �`� ��, f � - -- - 9l�L_ � � Ninw �'� ` �^ � _ � . � _ WC-2 11t . � � � �•• ,_oa,_ _ • �a � i � .-_` , o .c r. : � `? �� R � � i 2a,— i 3 � , `� �� i r 1 – � � _�+�� '�� -- — Elroy _ o M � � _ �`�� '�" i ! � . ��,,� �� .. � �.i� c� —,�_ � '� ��lh__,� • .. � Legend : ��', `� -- ' _ � W�st Centra , �. . . - � 16th � WCPOP 1��` — - - \ i�, � ' MMD • _ .� •.�;� • � 17th—_ � w �" � i $' � � � � '�� • - � \ _ 0 w �'' i - - — � `�� -'"�-3 '� � - 1 t c - wc-s • � _ 20th - - � % -- ,:. s 1 °�„ g � C �_ - l' , 2.1 st r � �----' � i � �', I '� „� � ��. � 22nd � i � - - � / i � j j �+�� ■ • \ \ I _2_3►d_ wC- 23rd �L' f M� �� ` o '� x 4th_..j� � R'2 o n � n ., �� ,... �..;., �,,,. �.....�. H N � �E/i�� .".,.. _.: .� , � , �., ,� � � WCN 9 - � � � L end ��i,� �-. , PIOS � � m . ��'�►4" �— WCNPCP � *� �n,..� g ,N�- �- ��--..�._. t�- � — I � +Gl � �1�-,0- -�" PQ� � "�� ♦ :,' � � � � _ _ -- - WCl1-t �MUC •� ~ . ti-'� '" � W- - - � G � w� _ S O'��h �" ' QR' �� '-., - - . �;�� -'� .�- --� � W�-� �� - ,s� : � p :� � � 1�1C N-7�yp,'� �,�, � � wcN., — _ � /� �' '�" L'�� \ - � t � - wetas � •� . +�' �,� ,� . , �� } _ - wcw.� � �� o �, � wCN-� F Lt �,)"�� `*, 4[31C �°� _ ucke v `' Q ��af! � � - Wcta.a ` � ♦ �N�� ' 'i r -- � T o � 'ti � wGN-6 �` � WCN-9 � -��i � � --- � �._.J�tk� ��C.3Jb � . „ �f ,r, � - �� a•ner � DR: �, � _ o • � � _ ,'' �.M r'T? i' a � � � - - - - . . �. _ , / �a � .i IIA�N.Q��Q i - Gr� - "�'"�""'- ----� �(►fo7c� `'� r � o �' .- _�� -- _ _ o,.�� . -� , _� : _ _;..= I L _ ;"�'SN�N-� �^ � � . _ --- — _ _ m , _ , � �-�- _�� WCN 9 -------�� -_�. --� ��_��d�� - i �a � � ;,O -� -�' � r+�►�; P10 S __� !��I� �„ � �€��-o _ - - ----= =�_aoF� � 1"��:_. _ � -, � b�� `', _ �� -`h4�-- ' f �-' - �+ �N-� ._., 14�.3usta- �.t- I "►� ' -} �,'�?sO�/lt � � �= "� � � � __�_ Miaslon �- � ` r� -�� . �i'� i _ 1 11lL�Ywell--- i b � o / � � ory�c- � r '�1�1�-4 � � i � � ,�-� .,, _— C � � � - � c � v�� tp � ,�� te I ea _ ..Boone . . ., � � / �' _ �-�� = - � �e mot � ~ N �' st� � �l-• - n s `WCN-� E � �Ilo. .. ; � � /,.,,�,_ ` _ _ - � i -� — c - - - � �- � s �9.� , � I � �� -�-� � � �wcrv-2 _ � ` Y n.,►,�. -- Q___�_ { - o MDR .— H�, � ��o� 4�� I I j~ 3 I� t�� `�Ll_ • � � MAIfl ;� f w C � — �.� _ M� ,. ` i�+ � P�a�J RN�Ide - ��--� - ; iS . � q - _ _, � � I :;, �, SPf�� ;�. �„�,.--- .� --� :-?, — ' - - N -- ,__.------- -.�-'� -� _ - » -- ...._. . _ .— °�` , • �---i WCN 1 �� w 2nd - '� q Oplsw�t . . a a___'dr-��Hifi� �NI�1� i1�-tl�f� _ � • ��5 � �3r I - -v - - `� �? ', dth � � � 4 w � � _4th �. d . - - - — . � � - � {�� C . �� l� � N/CN '9 ', `st" � i � _ _ �' 9 �� Le end o n � n _ P/OS �� A,� ,� � � o�kwe►i .� ,...m,.. � , o ,� .d WCNPt�P V17CN�8 ,_�� 'o `� � _ � g _ _ _ _ _ u , - - • �:�_ �- -----'� a � PQPID �1� ,MUC ��' ��i'� � �_ _ - WCN-1 S ��Q�- < '�!�_ �a�''�� _ - _ �� ° N^= � ��a�`�" �'''� � � �N� '�'ay �',�� --"p� �..�° . _ _'`" � . � - - CN 7 p � � --' � . � wCN-a a ' d WCN-7 �road-, =�R=3 �°'�, - .. - r �f • r = - �'" � i i `� � � � �� N � � I Fa�R-3 _ � - �� -`= - W�CN$ w '��t�t�s�s� _ Gmtp � _ k -,�' `�`ar� � f =� t� _ � - aro t � � o► �� WCN-7 ' � ` �� s �t . .��..r__ -- -�.. �____,�� W.0 N -6 ' - VIFCN-8 __"� �,t ; l _ - -� Jl�ckao�+t��atb d �, - - � � ��a , '- ■ �aji�sie � MF-2 � � �, C - WCN-9 � � p'" :�___�: � : �t�►iha 1� ' �' ; �� - [�lqnsfi td �'� i �. ,..:,� � ,, �anS x � ,� f .;�� '� � X ' �� w Kt10X ' 1I v C N=5 � ` `."; L..f� AI �t� a n � '�'z"��+ -r� 1� WCN-9 'W` �' i � � s�+.� _ - - �- �ndiana— ._�. - ;,��, ,. � � � � }:�o_ _ - .. -1 _, _ �,- � gD — _ - - � � � � v -8 �_ i �90 • � � _ --- , � '- P/�S __ _-_ =._I.'30_ _ ?C�F��'-�---.��190-_ Nora�29��FF - - -- � �_oN-�� - � - , _l� �� : � , __ -_ � ,, -- ��o Nora : r'�'t � � uQustel �._�i � WCN .J� � . __.. �� Mlsalon _. _ �'� - .:�N - -- �� - _ � C M ��cr tl___r_. , � ; _^� �- _ r=� - � - � � S Sin �" - '� I __y__ �{nt� ,- ` � , � -- � � �9�/' - - oa � '�; Sha ti A � ^- -- '°eBao�e: _ ..' I � I ��; � _ - - - ��mot � f i ��I . . � atc+ld�o -- - � :-,Tr � � an ., - --� � ,_. _ � � ,,;�% E '_ 4 � o allo ' � wC�-Z i4r4� _ :;•� � aroadw_ $_ _ E_� =—WC =7 – WCN-3 M .� S�inQfl .:��o� �_ _. ��. i : "�� u -R- � S �i�ff Iki�_ � .� � — - ._ ml � �lt ai i , „ , .�� ,_ � _ : -- 'V�I1 �t�Y -- - " �''� � �� W � N -4 N -� e�► , 9 +NiXon ' � � m , � ,, �u� I � � -- I � � � � ._1_. . I -,� .- , Ma n � _ � � `_"'° -- rro c gpe g* �-- -- _ ►� _ Ma�n _ A WCN-9 � oRi qiSide �� ..�-C� �� I � _p _ � � I � - = .;�. � , 1_P%4S �..�' � _�� i � ,". _ � _spr�c�e ��- � � _ m .. � - — ! SP'��• S ! r- . ` - -�--� ..°,�T_'a, � - 1 c v � - x - — �,� ; � m . � t at _ I cu S'c �' zn}d_,....�`�" W,C N , o � r� � n _ � - �o z- -4 QArew��'-�=, - � -�- ;o��ikirE��ri�titt�t��r�'� - ° ��, � �_ 3rd � - � - a► aM 1 .., . � . .cl 4th— - 4 � ° �'• - I � Sth �( C� V� ' � i� -- C 1 Stl.Lu_ N �� Legend 3�� •��s�t�� = � I A I � � ECNPQP � � 3 �� . sr i c „ � � = i m \ �� _ r�t� � � � � � � ar/QiRP'r - �� !�� ri� ECN• �atv��,. ""� - E • � B Im�° LDR - - _ d d� � n � . - Ec► �e�l�o�y � � � � � - E� � �, • � � a� � _l�_'Q�11 �, � �- - � � A � � . a �ro� � �N's �! . a ' ��I � -� 3 E � Rkh � __ r�� > Q , R ,� E r � �,::.; ECH-6 � � � �--�� , ,� ;, I� � o�k�n_ C N-6 ---. ' � �-� c,�- _ __ _ _ - , ' �,,. i �, ` �� R LD.R _ i_ __._._ _�---� � : � � �d ' _ f - -- - - ` � - ° , -., � _ --� - � ECN-4 : a �� -- ��duscr��! '" � . \ � Y r0 � I � Q1(d�� p � - I �jbC�(-�. _� �a—'�C �M , ��d � - '�C :�,, � � , 1 i � ��yri�c C N ,,� '�, P_� � • �� i � Irtdtr�t� �1 ' p �_.. = -- --� .� � - �-- � _Ae�tk D c � � + �� + � " "' �� . � `" � � � ; ind�st�tal � . � � � ■ � �5 � ' - � _�-- -� � . � \ � � � Partc �_. � �, �- � t ��,�_ � , - .� � - __ �v�!.td " a . � a � ' N \ ��p . . • �--"�—�� .�` �� I � T � .Fa� � , ; : -�:r .: �: EC=N�:_3 ��ry __�e�r-� A �4; ��- s _ _o E- �t� � ,� n �c � �`,, ECN-1 L Z �S�. � � J l • � � ' °� -= rv�u c - l �„�.-' � �_ � � : ECN-2 - � � � , �� fia e --�c� � � ; H D R '�� o b �, . .. a � � �� g � � - � , c �� , o nr9 -"-� � �', � �� , � �- ' - �.. � 1- �L��` ( L � ` ' � Indl�na--�� 9ha�wion _ � —� c+�e — � —_—�_. — - _ � � � �_ - �( 19p � - � " :� � e� ,' - / Bp 19p °► ` � o � -�� ='_�---�; _, _ . . W290�N, � �� i � - t -_- - F'� - e - - - - ` ,a, ', % Au9u�tP' �3 �.'°--'+— o ' � - - . _,/ � 90 � �. !lon�Ql.��. � � MislLQ� ' _ _ �� ,�� Le end � ��t1 � �� -f-� �� " = 9 � w � _C�. � ECNPQP on � n: 3 �.� �.� ,,_ � � ° � � L �� ~� I . � ECN•i = � � w' „ „ , '" ECN-5 �s��'� � ;. `�,� = '� Bro � m • R-3 - - - . i . � _ dy � i� - �cN• '� � 1 � wen�i�► • slFssh�►_-' I ~ " �. - �e"-� T _1 - _ E �___J �e� ��_ _"�► � � < < - �c�,� • a �— � _ " � �. � `9� tN�o� 9 � � :� I o --r' � ._:N � E �' S M I� � d � � _: � � � -- R{ch �`�_• � ECN-e ; ''�. = � � � - o�� ECN-6 ` � _'� or, _ _ ��~ _� �� - - . .. . `. ��. _ _ _�_ - . • -� a `�-- � �- R 3 '��,��.�� : __ ��- � �j, Lo�sSe o. � �o - - _ � - - • � i °. ��.� � _., _- - � - . ♦ ♦ � , m � - - -id_ os o�a / .,,� �� • ,• - .� _ ..._�,�._ - _ - -�- E C N-4 : _�..� Prri4 A �� :%� _ . . � � �� mdusMsl � ; _ 1 Go'� �v,� � �� - � - l +i.�i rk B . .. �a - - — Q � � _- I !� � �� - �-P�--- � � ��1ta••-��,�4 _-- _ - __ -- i - . • �' � " Indust al Wnd'• .= -� . � , � � � `�� Pstk C ' � ' �. � �� o� _ w�- ', � lrtdu� n �._ = " �� R_ � � P�erk Q � �S �! -. � _,'76 f �- �� - �, _ � . _ _ �' '. �,.�PZ �' , � �s : IndSstrlei x � �" +�i •� . I . � o ■ :. P�t1c E � � � Ir 1 rQ11lr' ' '. � _ � J _�uClld - . -- i _ ' —'C a ,_ d �' ,-i� M - , � � � � .�'� � �fedOf�C + I ---� � , � i � �t � feh'1►1�_M_ _ � � . - � c ,�• I�Iln►teW b . _ _ Q � I G s- �3 Ur - ��0, � � � !. � -Gr"° � ,� �ke�r� E C N-1 '. f S�'�► s a .w� - : .- .� . . � M'dfi �`\`\'`! ; _'� � °' _� M U C � � ,z— ��' �- ECN=2 ,,._.. � e � j. T ,��sp�� _ � �C,�7 J � � � �• � `�` = �� Cartlsl •s� MF-2 �y `' , � � � ' .� rmine g ,� � . g� � �' i C . 7tp i �--o � � _ °-- �r - - ' _ _,..��Mansfleld= _ �: �`: ; i � ^ - " '� I_nd�?na_=-- _ ►F _ x ,; �:`��. �� - f . ,,._ �_�1, _. � sn��+o�+ _ __ _ __ _ _�._ _ - - _ � . _�._ �-.__ � .� �� ' �- �rt��t�-"_ � � -'" - - _ _ - - _ �," ' - �e `��. . . � � , ; ��_ .� 190 ~ � - 1 gp I 90 � �`� a 'Q ��: � -'-`� _• _ _ __ _- �� -1 �R � 4�ar�1 I i i I I � � � � ttf tia� f �1K290 pN � , ` � 'N _�- � � l � AuQu�'' ,� �r ' %� � '�'" � � _ _�!� ' �a�.m � '�- � �.. _ Mlsslon s� -- �ll� �o sslon -- - 1 �_� _ra� �Q�i��o ��»��»��r��s�rr,,�rrr�i _ W��oo,y 1 -- Legend �� -- - -- __- � �,, -- . C o m _ � _ . Il� . p ECPQP . a�, -EC-S _ � _ � � EC-6 � s � rO, � i90 ��, � � _ — - - ----Miasion___.__. — ;� :RC ��j!! E C � Ec-� --- - --��_ ' - EC-2 4 O '�' �!- � � `° - N EC-] � i �` � �---- ,� ,; - � :� � ° �' •�,, � � � � 's � — ° : � ( , _ ~ '- -Mlaa�o� ` � �"� c � '� h.�rp a ;� � _'_ � ` - ec-s ` ° —� � � $ � � ' � - �� Fc-a � �� c � �i � r QL�ITie I a � \� r i Oes � � � - ��_. �� _� - EC-2 � °'� . � • M � � � � � EC-3 � � W : � � ■ HDR � e�aa�- .��r�-_ -- � - . � � � � �� ;o . : ---�-�� C „� � r + � LDR � .. ,� � � � � ---- ��u� - -- �. ` N1xon : � w m , � R1v�sl�s •� ia . � � • � I i � � � e w � C .� _ �a _ � ----- � C � �NefS� � • �Rl_1fDLsIQ� j � � • � f � � � f a m -- � � ; .� ----= I -- - - -Spr�gve � - - .. _ _ ,___ � � - - P�S�-- -- t _ _ _ � - - Spre� � . � � �.� { : ; � r �-'.�,� � t� � � " � �b EC-� 1st � •_ 1st - ' � � � CMV 2nd r � _��r��r��r�� r��'� : a � 3rd�,j � � � N ; v �� -� ]rd_ � W - — I _ w � � I I z �Z .�j � 41 d I $ � (a s'� 4th _ - L— � �� sn.n"°" -- — -- — - - - _ =-� �-= `�``�-"' - Legend . ,e� _India�� . �_ _ _-�-= Z n i n _ – � °!� � � - - � -::� - g ECPQP � � � � n��4F ��n��Q � so ;: r 1 � - - — - --- '► W290 O � POPtD •�ora_ ^ -_ ��►tr — - N . : , yo�� -.= = — . .. - - - _ �� -;:_ � � � EG1 16 ; - �.��,�.,EC-5 � �- ��' � , EC-6 � i ^;_ -, , �- � - EG2 � � _:. M►sslon _�I RC i �`��`+i�� ',' ,� _ M - EC-3 _- -- — - � __ - '__� - �'�� M - �� EC-4 , � . ?��1l. � ,°� ,� '° ` -- � ~ j4 �� rti: . _.- - EG5 - � � �� 7 - � �_S#rtta__ � - :� m ;�, , ., ., � M��a� `�� - EG8 = } �ha ". _ o ' � " � oR :� » _ . � i:i�ii� ; � ��i�i : � a � . I - � 'r F,28� - � \., ■ � `� j f : ' ; ' '" � : ; � � �.,� _ :� - s Q _ - - . . -= i � !i�%: .- ' ' I � �. - � --- .A _. ��i� � ,'. L?�frtf j�" I f; � a _ ` .. _ s � ..: E _ � -� _ _EC-2 1 �f i Cata!�g � ��"' ` -� � � - � � ;,, _ E _ ► EC-3 :-' � A �: I � I .1�. _ �• _ .� - . � � I � . � a - _ -_- _ _"' �.- -a�` dwa � . . . � N A � /r � o �� `i ' nn fl � . v _ �.� � EC-4.� ; s _ ' — � — ' :;. J � ' R-3 � � _ on�o � - . � . - � � ,,� � � . . � - - � � � ;- _ — _�-- _ �/ . � . . . / N)xa� ■ � � � t�' : �ii C � �V9f�bA w� � � � : ,,;�; , - -� = � .� � Main � _ � �.0 -� C- %j` � `_`�-i . i .� �� - � __ c m �Riversl ..� � �-- 1b y �� : Q�VOf61�, . ��` \ ``: C � C ` ' �' �� \ �\ ��\\• r 1* •_� �� ' \� � �,�,�. • � ��; � �-� � t �` �� - � � : _ �� - � i�' pnfl ; — SPrrflir° � -- � Spra9�a -- .-_ - . - - � - . � I r �_ i � � � � ' ,, E C 1 m - ,. _ � A _, .: . � . . � �st � ' °' CMU nd . ��rr�r��rr�rr�i��r��r�� i�� wa ?�nd r — 3rd i �v`� - " - __ � � - � - - - 6 , � --- -----�� s� ---- (E S-5 � ��ir�� ECS- ��i�� r� r ° . �. � � .� �� Ma� - .. g�„ � ,,, _._� 3 �-_-. � „__ � �CMU „ � � � �_ a � �� ►!:- � d_� t� Legend _ t �• }� - � R � � �- � 5�11 � � � � �' � ,%Y "�� c ath - EC3PQP - � � �' eth � + . � ' � > *QMO r--� � \ �� r — � � � � � � � Ecs-� - ` -�� _� � � � � ' I I - \`� 10t - ECS,: � - � p t�� . � l� � � - � � � � c� ' � E�S•3 c ` a = � I � v ` ��3 i �� 4 � E�S.� - _ EC—S 3 ' �' , ' � � ��.s E rj�'n - � � $. I�ECS LDR � � --� - : ,a�, � ��s.s 1-1 D R �'�� , � n �, � , - aa+ _� a � � ori � ��, _� o — o o � I � � ., q 3 � � A' \ u � M � ^ 1 � � , w r � � 19tfi ` .t� p > -� a �' ( m , � � 1 .� / $p� — 2 w � �un 1� ��sL � • � e �.. � , - � , � a _ � 2Qh � 1 4 � 4t h;� � _ — � I I _24th _ / ' u 1�1� y ` I � - ?��.1� e P�Q.S .��/111��1�� 11 � ' � c.� �r�� . _ - � h ' l 1 '� � J / �__ —29t � � snon �) C ,�_ � � � � � � e —• '� � ' , - - �9tn�f � ��w 4 , � ��, - s�e+,_ - , � �� -�} ! . "�i� 1� � � �� a ' � � ° 'rtta � `� ` � �c�-- �:: - 3ath '� � � �,}/ j � � ` S. / � � . J �� :� E S�i��•t � ' , rQ__95�� t�: 1 . 1ft 1 E - .. �o-� - ��!_. .E�► — ; ,� '-c= � �.� Y zh `;� - ' U �y��M�ti �/�f �. a - . • ,o " �' �� I �' , ; � � � �. — 4 � I 4 th � � 1. . . W �� ` - - C � ` u � _- , I _ i � � r ' �,'� .� J � � .� �� .a c�et (- �! — .� / c ,N _ > � d '� ' ' -- �� ( � 4 �_ _� � ° �� dth i � ,\_,� .� , � . � •, `� .�9Ga�_ / - -� . a ,c �. � �.� _ __� \1pt/�., 1 - a � �0 1r - !-� � : � i -- � ��._ � -_ -- I � � �► � �-�.;--� c o°' � r � ��"�`' �' � �� F � ` �` �� - - tntt _ E C S-" 'h I w � � `�° � � E » � r---� � {�'' � ECS-3 LLR� a � � � � �;� - � � � p — - � � �� t � � � r / " _ --- ��>. � � � � ' "� h i �— � � , - - ; N; _" � '`�.E�C�S-4 ° 17t� v y � � , l �i � � ;� i � 1ath __ 'i' �`� M�=2ts '� �a�n_ � � � � , � j --'" '�,� -__ �� w � � �+ � � � � , z `� • ' � an-- �'� � r�� s�nr �.�.. — --� �• �tom �_ ,J G % _ ••- ��, __ a � _ � � � � I � - � Z1 �S� �� ; c — � � Z \ �� i �� ` I �� .. ` / . � � � � r �� _ �J �' + � • -- � —J t * �.�3 4 __24th � EC. - _ r , zsn,, .. -- � , _ � --� ._2scn _r � � / `�� ., �`� � � sw,,, � ec�, --� .� . l� � ..�61�_. J P/OSr ,. ��r��tr �i��- ��' .�� _ _� _ 1 „� �, _ r ; � , _ .� � �"` ��" � � �' ; � � � Legend -� � �, � eno � c � - . � � - fl ' ', � I ^ � � — � � 8 = �� — ��( � �-i- � ECSPQP , U * , , � — , � r. ( � �+o � . �� —�-�- 0 34tn_. ' _ `'�� O Ecs-, �� d, � � � �.�- � ��;� r � > � d --J o' i = - �cs- � - � � � 3� - . � ECS-3 � p , J 3�,_ C��+ � - Ecs-� �� o ��; . � � ;� y '� � ecs.s ,� �3 �� S 1 � � � r � Ecs.s � r '° R-2 et i �� lal�'�°^ -�� f �� i I �- �. 190 � E � � � f °� : ES-8 '�'t��u�- �n i�s�� ,� __ irrn Legend � - -- - • -� � o�dway -_� � "_ O____��dwey � �--� E8POP � n9A�ld � � sPL�9 Id �, E A�kt I~ �I __ � PQr1D � , � � � �. ( �s-, E : '�' I � ° v� � c o�lv_ ( � - - - - -� 1�'+� 1 i,p ; � I � a v+�QX �`'�- ,P : � Es-2 �I1�ywsyL�—;y _ � � G ' -- �l �le�CN'� i M � S E5�7 , � N_ � � ES-3 � � � G '�C M U ES-6', '_ r�`, - M.1 [� �,� `� = ES-5 � � �A �u I u I�IDR R �Q� - ES•5 �'' L P�9 � Sn� u� - � ! S C � -- � � � � � Es-s � �'" � cr� t � � ES-7 n n r _ T I G. _ �� r� I _ 4� � � : �� ` - r - - � - �ES-4 ` � y /" sn± � . � I LDR � � � � �'� ° �.� m � � ' � S� � . - M r ,r, � �� N � �, Ze � � q ` ` _ Qth . ,//1. � c � E S•3 T � / • �I - � w LDR �an �� = ��'� f ,_ "; = ��,� � � � � I , • •'•►► � � � - r s ,� �� ,� � � � d r b� � � 3t ( '� � . � �e � E� +�� _ ES-2 � �ea+ ' g ' LDR ' , �� .�r�� r��i�ri � ' �• — �_ r� � �� , �� - o m ,, }�� . �- �-� : ;� � � . � ��+• , , , i� .. ��► r A, `�� ; ' �� ' �� y � v I � �� ~, ,� � � nn � -� smQt , � - � �rg� �f�.• ��, a r � � `catatdo Legend � � atalaO ` ES_8 ' j�'�'�� — ��19i�N��FF �90�'�+��ti�� , ,"�, ; n � ESPQP � w_ GO srnsdway_ �L�- _3►' __,- arvadway � , ` ngfi ^ w PQPID Springl'�Md ., c E '" Alkl i ` I = I � _' ; R � ES-1 � ~' �d o n -:". i - o I � o 'd �5 0 � c O � -- P �o`�"' �: � ES-2 � o � I � I � 1cY - - - 1 � , �-. � • M II�ywAy o _�v`N � ;� �- V�Ileyw� � ES-3 ( - -- � � n I __ ES 7 � ��-= - - i . r_� : -�Nix � � Es-4 .� . � � � . _�-' Mefn lcle ' � � 5 ,- � C M U E F 6 ' R�r� � ES-5 ., ES- ! M - � I � C Sp►ague __ - . , : � � SP��9u � ES-8 -�-- � - � � �� ' ` ` � . 1 st � _ oa�i � c . � -� � � - ES-7 _ , � i � --� ES-8 n i --_ •--- 2 � a►- � c - � c' � - ,3rd y c 3 -� . � A� ' � _ 14th _1�_ _ 4th-„��: ' � � ES-4 —"- y �� th- • ` ro �� ; ,� ! -- --� �" � � � i , 0 / � ✓ " va � 1e -��1_ -st�'-__-.� � '" � ' � ,�L � � ° � � �1 � .� �� R�d9� � � � : m ,, I� � � f �' I � , a g�_ � � �,' ` _8th . ,��,, m �, /� _ ��I�/d �� ES-3 � � �, ) � Qth� � � �� -� � ��i�� ".'_ R 1 _=11th� ��`� ��`a � ,r ��►��, + � 1 � I � `� / a �� ' l� ' 7� � � �o � ' � �- ' � � � � t _ - . �... 1 1,3t n, � �,V,� � •c __ : � �ath -- - __ � F � ; ES-2 -� � � �, `—" - ES'1 J, - `_ � R-2 -, � ��R��r��r � __ �--�. ' � • . � onin . .. 3 � h ��, r � �,� �� c '� �� : o t' . � � �R� - � �'� �� '`''�� , h � � c � ; r 4 '�iwi � �' ` � ' ,� '�4 � E � � � � � � .3� � � ..�:.; ' `3 � ,,N 'b� a r 1/1�� ; r 1 � �^� _ U�_ �� ■ y EN-3 '� � '= �� '�.� R-3 as� ve►� `��°��`, = o n � n � `� choal Bro��.s"��- �..�w �j� " -� '� � _ ' � � Le9end . E vA � a " o- ' Horo ��'_° �c ' ��t�� EN�C�P � �, _� J� ,,,}. _ � PCPID -; " � _ __�� EN -6_ =i Rlch � . 1, ,.�. _ � �u•�'`` � _. ' � �- =t;� :. _��u+� � � �� Jeu_ � -,... __-•_- --- - � - ----. f-1 ' ��- ., . -�_ g Ot`�= - _- - - - - �•- : - - EfV-2 " - �"r L � -�umbl , '� - � EN-3 I, � � ~ � P:a�k A.,� � � EN-4 �" . � t' dustr�nl � A � � Klem� �t�rk 8._ � � : - � � , � I�dustria! '�' � : � � _ ' Pa�k C � � - EN � � — - — Cour�tand . � I�dt�stria! � � � � � � __ �--� � (G` � � __Peric D. � � z w, � �a �"�'�� , • : i� � � � Induq I � _ �r � W Li�-� _ - • i o _ � � P.l�� '�` v � _Oaltan � __ -� _ = � --- _ i� - .—__ ,. , �n ., = a , � a — . _ � -- �.. � ':. v► � � : � f � r � '� � EN-5 EN �'lyb'w � Failrvl@v� � a- '--�uttidl; � �' � o. c- �> � R,.. �,�� { ', � � � ,�' a 1 `1 �B!!� � - - � � � �rt�� ' ett� � �..�:� -- EN-1 ,-I �� errtn�, � ' � � � PIOS `�- �� • � � ry � � " � � �- � �~�'`� � � �� IMsmitl�ld ��yyY ; - an�4�' , ' ;3► a ;.. --�-5n .� - � .- >> . _ - _ _ �nb,► �n ,';; "'� � lndi _ � w�� n � � o '" � ' � —� � � � �/ ��' Sdm�� : � � o � g � - ��+- i � �� 1� ��. V O � �, � a� � ��ti �� ' � r E B'� ' � �Q - - - �. ,Fj� �— MIIEl10T1 C � -- _ -- --_--_—_ _.. - + !�'it� � � __ ,� � � � � � � r;; . -: , :_ � --� , ` -�-.� sinto E N 2 � , _ '� � -''�'- \ '`�� ' �� *i; � 9 �' - -- _ _ _-- - � � �� I � _ _ = o �� E - , � - --- oe - � A I � � ; �1�� ff � _ - -- � Queen or�ma��_m EN-�3 ��i� Legend 5 �� ,M - LD �tval ��t11�f" �� ENPaP gct�oo) Broa�1c ,rn'"" I. � c� o - � i � ♦ �i�� 1T• �t1� �� PCir10 m � �� V ta � oa ��+ 10 � o I � ` �� t �. t�� = — erv., t _ - _ AQh� . � �1�1 � EN-2 � /� � R �� h vf ► .. I ! I _ —� � t,L��' .� ' --r--� 1 �- �i i ►l1� �. �, �� --, �BQ Tr�t----- - ------ t � � � _� ` � -- - - - - - -��`�' _ _. � _ -'_`_' ` = »,::.. EN-4 ""'....---- � -�tts�al I � � - �.5 " �p fk. q ' � cD � —-� ' I�dustriet ��O I I = � EN'� KIRLt1A►L�' R . � �4 - � � � I dustr�el !" ' � � � I ��I `` � � I dustflal �Ark C L � ��^�' EN-6 � �� „ w « � ',~ b �« � ' - I� � I Indu trial N v �,Lc I w u�._ �( L� � o I . P_urk E ' � � ..—Q3l1i�n �_ � --f �d � � �` ��--- �_ `�� C A . . .- . � i _�----- . - - a � , � : i� Y o� EN=S` �"EN��+ �, : �rv,a� � om . Q ` 1 LDR.� � k � � = � .��-� � �,-� �. � � � µst� �� _ M�rtetta � - ��_ _�- EN' , '� � ;-��! , � ,- a P/O '� ` �'� . _. _ -. - - - � rY 1 O' N .�� 1 � �� I � M�n Id � ° _�.. • c IndUN!� � ,� I n9 �Y --� r , '- �--'�"� � � A ,, � � ;Indl�na t�� . �� .�� ', �_ � C � Cf � d Q .�. � �- c � ��'` �� ' 8 ' C� o C [ � Q � � � d i � 6i �.. r " �' . ��_ � � � k � ` - w .�g ;�, . '-_ � � � s. v � �= _ �� +�-- ' �• _ SIntO _ � E } � 2 �' � � tl � '�9yo��;r� _ -__. _� � st►�rn� � _N�DF� = s o �._ � eoaie . ` " 4 � �' � ' h�r��,�� r �d �� 190 ta�do � E �3 $''� - j �t�ht11!!• ilfl��[! lS �� ' - �Broaciw� .. �In Id ■ a er — rans o a �on � �� '� � . �� : _ ,;��, ' -- �;.�,� -� _-�� , Map 3.2 � �'` , 1� � Bike and Pedestrian l! _ � 1 1 �_ � % �( �. _ , , � System � � ,1, ' _ .. - , ' � 1'Isr.',r'� F � • '� • I � t r �' ;t� ,C ,�: nL'+ .,. ''r .a i . r� , . 1F.ib., , I • � '.i,�., � � • I l C�ty O� � �� ! i < _ _Y � , _yi/-.� • , - . ., - � � ��, � �� - � ugcnd S O�nC `` �,•,• ��' ' � � ' : � ',��'�I��ie�nlr �� Y �.n ` � y�.i l�a: �-,� � I. � .,' f�nw��a•r:�tl��1' .:r \ 4M�� . • •/�� •��• c. siKw �..+c ,..�� ,� •' `I , _ - - -- -- a YicTeM �.w. dwiRat� 1�1� a�cbl llne.rJn� I I ,� � • _ .� �/�� • � � .. - � r�rw �j, � z _ � - � ►« .��- � SLu�d 11u Ml� � i li. ' -. -�. � . �r r►-. . ,a�l�, , �='�"�" -` � ' � �•x �'.z.Kt �!� - i� -'- _r �..L:si �`'y. -- �i! � --- �. . .. a o f�pppMds�f� Vp ��1 � r _ . ,.r. , _ � jA1ti �T;1itI 1!'OS ,,�`.-.� . �� r, �.> i.�..�„ ', §;-i-! '_ ` .� I • - —_ y -�'- •i w..brn. 1 �: x' I . �-_. u:��,: ti.� ` -��i� 7 �-: a� - •�� v Nti!�� rk . :r `�-� `fn{ - �� E�7tlef IIib lJ� -!,,�c,�. I � � r ;�...��.t I {' - � ��° % . <: `" t �� - - , .-�- T - '�`� . . . . hoQo.d 6,t, tin. -i� � � � Lt �"�-�--...__� i, �t 't? � �" hrt J � � � �- �; }! � I � � _ F�.� �. � -� _��-•� � AIInM• �•' -- - � ' � Y -- •� � � L - i�� :.I i � SI� �il� SO�t�IMy -�w 1•i� - ' i _ � _ " � � Y ' - " � r � - , I ".=-�- rti - , = "� �` ' l►l�Lr '�:.� r �Ci y�ot �. seu.d w1.1� � J \ -' ,. ''�Libcrty _ ' L-_ — z_�-=, ,� � � : : . L .! I r � `+ .. — s. w - �c� y � , � -- . t . =-" �� r.e..v� r.� c; [ ' r ( � — 1 i`. �y ! c►,�.w i.�lkt � ►`- ` I +- � � � � • prpppNd r�i�D l�1!!l w,..a... j � � , ` � �, � ��.i ..`� : � _ � _ i i � •. , _ r «� � _ r r � • � � �i , � - ; -r I � , Oui i r - - � � � � m �ft��ttidl ► � ti�. � � . - � � ' I �� ,�, i . 1-, A fw �h T��►i�r - T y � �111Mf�b4I1 " « *.� � � ' -+�� ! �ir4 HLM� �' i ; � � Schooll � ;;:;2 ` ~ :_._w�e �.�:, i r+' v -; �: ` a s� s � �,� •.�' JM. �. . . . .° . - �. . . �.Al + ._� �,-^-}�. .. .. � •� • l � r' � � � �..w. Rukwd o , �''� � � --� .S6 J i r � � 1 --i� _; ti. �„ti, - - -----.. � r _ . •i � oth.rl�AuniGPaili.. Y , « f , , ;r'. ,- ' � � , .. .� � 1 _ -'��r � �_i.,►A•�urr . ir� � � , T ' . � �� -;- l � ��. � Ctt�' olSPoktet V�1My ` r.�a - ��..a��;��;ii�iF; �.ti �;�, rJ �..•-� ' � � � �,`"`' -��_. � .► _ Urbu CxwNb Mw ,,, ; �.; _ ..._ _ � �- �� . --- � �,•, -,� ,�?� � �:��---:�b � � � � �"` - � � � i- - -, -. -�-, , � ; n r . � ,.,�t . .'� i '.�� i' . � �.�i � r' - � . "t, � 1 , -��!!''� - ' � _ -� - Knt'Y �MY 1. ,�,1`.b'� ' �y�.� WNIf80d�s � , - y ' 'i'� � y � '� - �-.- �� L r _ P - i r 9 �,.,� ~ �_ .� _ �. �.� ! C; S ��' - � , � � r1 .7�� f �� ► `I�' f � . t �_ r' � . �, � � \ - �k } +, b,`� �i `. �' �� '` . ' :ni�� . �-' � �, ' l, � ^ t:. .-�� r � �:id�1 �� T __1 � M �.. �._ _� ;r , , I • I � � • � qa � / . , 4 ('inir �� " ti. � pl d ' � 1 ' � ' `} -! Dirw �_, � � � , a:(� ► "� 4 .i� I' ( � y �� 1:+� t ,. ► � r' I "%t4!! - __J.1�.._ r lfy�n�� , �;*._ . l"... r � - . ' �' � �' ^ � ,w. ` � DUes 1=/1]/700� � C � � " i C 9j� P � �. �. "� � � � � � _ , �. i-: . — `_" _ `r`y 1 ` . � � I'�_^.� ��li�'"/�� i:� -' -• � �i � 0 O.S 1 I►Ylw ' - r � "� � r � , 1 'r I ' - . •, � 't 1 � t . , , � � . � '-' � ` , � t - �(�, � ' �f"�� t �/ N.wa. ?7Kp�fi�rwa�wniAonn�nditrsaput�+�wplkdfain»nsa '`�` �_ �•- :,k t1 �� u+�nct� mI u nA/at W ctsWaq rstiueaa TAi C�ly �nla nn tk�u �' �-• i �� ( � . �� r ,,,� � ��. ,,, , Cy�ry�� ir �w.wrtra aA�w ihr �cn�nr,Y n cwrrrn� of Mw wp ww1 'r - I� � l � ", _ � � - � � , �*�aaly d�lau�r k�1rYJiv errw� a�l anua��u rn w rnmeu+. a � t =____� � .� -^, / ` y '�•— : +r,�. .,,s� � ; T� �N� a�y �n �. c,�• �r,y �.+► vd��. c�a. - , 1 �., �cr� . � � � r,r,�k�...an.p.i.wr rJ�a,�rx►yrw.wn�. r�,M� ol�.raoa _. I I ��.�h "a � �. . i� � 7 •.;, �.. , heMr� M �r LYl �1 ��a� YrrT. (.�111 IM�Yl�� Ap1rw� ■ a er - a � a ... ac� � �es City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan CHAPTER 4— CAPITAL FACILITIES AND PUBLIC SERVICES 4.0 Introduction The Growth Management Act (GMA) requires new development to be directed to areas that either currently have adequate public faciiities and services, or to areas where facilities and services can be delivered within the 20-year time frame of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan (SVCP). Facilities and services that are required for new development must be adequate and available at adopted levels of service (LOS). Locally established LOSs help to define and contribute to Spokane Valley's quality of life. 4.1 Plannlns� Context This section provides a review of the policy directives included in the State's Growth Management Act (GMA) and the Countywide Planning Policies relating to capital facilities planning. 4.1.1 Growth Management Act The GMA refers to capita) facilities planning in two (2) of the thirteen (13) statewide planning goals. The two relevant goals are: • Urban Grr�wth. Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner. • Public faciliUes and services. Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shell be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use w�thout decreasing cuRent service levels below locally established minimum standards. More specifically, the GMA mandates that the City prepare a capital facilities plan which contains the following components: • An inventory of existing facilities owned by public entities, showing the locations and capacities of the facilities. • A forecast of the future needs for such facilities. • The proposed locations and capacities of expanded or new facilities. • At least a six financing plan that will finance such facilities and clearly identify sources of public money for such purposes. � A requirement to reassess the Land Use chapter if probable funding falls short. 4.1.2 Countywide Planning Policies The Countywide Planning Policies (CWPP), originally adopted in 1994, contain a number of goals and policies regarding capital facilities and the provision of urban services. Those CWPP relevant to capital facilities planning are as follows:' Pollcy Topic 1— Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) Urban Growth Area Designation Process for New Incorporated Cittes: 1. The Steering Committee of Elected Officials will assign new incorporated cities an interim population allocation based on the Office of Financial Management population forecasts and previous allocations to the former unincorporated area. � Note to reader. The fdlowing policies are numbered according to the policy number in the CWPPs, resufting in non•sequential numbering in thls document. � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 1 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 2. The new city will conduct a land capacity analysis using the Land Quantity Methodology adopted by the Steering Committee. a. The city will first determine land capacity inside its limits and then will examine the capaciry of unincorporated UGAs adjoining the jurisdiction's boundary. 3. The new city will develop the Urban Growth Area proposal as part of its comprehensive planning process. a. The proposed UGA shall be presented to the Steering Committee at a public meeting. The new city must justity its UGA proposal, showing how the interim population allocation will be accommodated. b. The city must show how the area will be providing a full range of urban services within the 20-year time frame of the comprehensive plan. c. All Urban Growth Areas lying adjacent to the new city should be analyzed and either proposed as the jurisdiction's UGA, a Joint Planning Area (JPA), or proposed to be removed from the UGA and converted to rural land. d. The city will show its work by presenting its land capacity analysis, urban service anatysis and other information as appropriate. 4. The Steering Committee will conduct a public hearing on the population allocation and the Urban Growth Area and/or the (or Joint Planning Area) proposal. The Steering Committee will vote on the proposal and will forward a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners via minutes from the public hearing. 5. The Board of County Commissioners may conduct a public hearing on the proposed Urban Growth Area, and/or the proposed Joint Planning Area, and population allocation. After the hearing, the Board will approve and adopt, modify or return the proposal to the city for revision and/or adoption. a. The new city shall include the approved or modified UGA and/or the JPA in its comprehensive plan. b. The new UGA or JPA will become an amendment to the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan by incorporation. Policies 1. Urban Growth should be located first in areas a�ready characterized by urban growth that have existing public facility and service capacities to serve such development, and second in areas atready characterized by urban growth that will be served by a combination of both existing public facilities and services and any additional needed public facilities and services that are provided by either public or private sources. Further, it is appropriate that urban government services be provided by cities, and urban government services should not be provided in rural areas. Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) include all lands within existing cities, including cities in rural areas. 2. The determination and proposal of an Urban Growth Area (UGA) outside existing incorporated limits shall be based on a jurisdiction's ability to provide urban govemmental services at the minimum level of service specified by the Steering Committee. Jurisdictions may establish higher level of service standards in their respective compr�ehensive plans. 5. Each jurisdiction shall submit proposed interim and final Urban Growth Area (UGA) boundaries to the Steering Committee, including: a. Justification in the form of its land capacity analysis and the ability to provide urban govemmental senrices and public facilities; b. The amount of population growth which could be accommodated and the analytical basis by which this growth figure was derived; and � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated �-�7-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 2 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan c. How much unincorporated land is required to accommodate growth, including maps indicating the additional areas? 8. Each municipality must document its ability to provide urban govemmental services within its existing city limits prior to the designation of an Urban Growth Area (UGA) designation outside of existing city limits. To propose an Urban Growth Area (UGA) designation outside of their existing city limits, municipalities must provide a full range of urban govemmental services based on each municipality's capital facilities element of their Comprehensive Plan. 11. Each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan shall, at a minimum, demonstrate the ability to provide necessary domestic water, sanitary sewer and transportation improvements concurrent with development. Small municipalities (those with a popufation of 1,000 or less) may utilize approved interim ground disposal methods inside of Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) until such time as full sanitary sewer services can be made available. Each jurisdiction should consider long-term service and maintenance requirements when delineating Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) and making future land use decisions. 12. Wrthin Urban Growth Areas (UGAs�, new developments should be responsible for infrastructure improvements attributable to those developments. - 18. Extension of urban govemmental services outside of Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) should only be provided to maintain existing levels of service in existing urban like areas or for health and safety reasons, provided that such extensions are not an inducement to growth. Policy Topic 2— Joint Planning wfthln Urban Growth Areas Policies 1. The joint planning process should: a. Include all jurisdictions adjacent to the Urban Growth Area and Special Purpose Districts that will be affected by the eventual transference of governmental senrices. b. Recognize that Urban Growth Areas are potential annexation areas for cities. c. Ensure a smooth transition of services amongst existing municipalities and emerging communities. d. Ensure the ability to expand urban govemmental services and avoid land use barriers to expansion; and e. Resolve issues regarding how zoning, subdivision and other land use approvals in designated joint planning areas will be coordinated. 2. Joint planning may be accomplished pursuant to an interlocal agreement entered into between and/or among jurisdictions and/or special purpose districts. Policy Topic 3— Promotion of Contiguous and Orderty Development and Provision of Urban Services Policies 1. Each jurisdiction shall include policies in its comprehensive plan to address how urban development will be managed to promote efficiency in the use of land and the provision of urban govemmental services and public facilities. The Steering Committee shall specify regional minimum level of service standards {see Table 4.1) for urban govemmental services with the exception of police protection within Urban Growth Areas (UGAs). Local jurisdictions may choose higher standards. In its comprehensive plan, each jurisdiction shall include, but not be limited to, level of service standards for. � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 3 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan a. fire protection; b. police protection; c. parks and libraries d. libraries; e. public sewer, f. public water, g. solid waste disposal and recycling; h. transportation; i. schools. Tabla 4.1 R�lonsl Level ot Servlce StandarQs FACIUTY LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD (LOS) Domestic Water Supply - Minimum Levels of Service for storage capacity and 1i�ow shell be conslstent with the Washington State Departmer�t of Health requiremerds and the Spokene County Coordi�ated Water Sysbem Plan requfremenba (where applicable). S�rstem Design — MiNmum Levels of Service for pipe sWng, flow rate, and systemadc g�id Domestic Water development shall be conststerrt with the Washington Stete Department of Health requiremertts and the Coordinated Water System Ptan requiremeMs (where applicable). Fire Fiow — Flre flow rate and duraUon as wefl as flre hydrent spedflcations and spaang shail be consisteM with local �re autt►orfty requireme�ts or the Fire Code, which ever is more strtngent. Incorporatad areas wip be provided wfth wastewater collectio� and transport systems In accordance with the adopted sewer cona�rrency requ(rements of the Jurisdicxion. Uninoorporated urban growth areas wip be provided with wastewater coltectlon end transport systems fn accordance with the requlraments for sew�sr canc�rre�cy a3 set forth In Spokane County's Development RegulaUons. Collection systems and transport systems will be designed for peak flow conditions so that overflows, badcupa, and dlscharges from the syatem do not ocwr under normal opera�ng sltuations. Speci�c design cciteria sha11 confomt to the requiremeMs of the Washington State Department of Ecology and local regulations. Wastewate� calleWon and Vansport systems will convey wastewater to cerrValized wastewate� treaUneM fadiiUes. CenUal'¢ed wastewater treatrnent and efAuertt disposal fadlitles will be planned, designed, and San'itary Sewer �s�� to provide e�luent that does not adversely impad the quality ot surface or ground water of the State ot Washington. Planning and design for wastewater treatmeM end effluer�t dlsposal facflities will be based on 20 year proJectlons of populaUon grovvth and current water quality c�iteria es esteblished by the Washington State Department ot Eoology. (CeMralhed wasfewefer b+eatmenf facilldes shaN be e part ot a sewage system owned or operated by a cKy, town, mun�ipa/ corporatlon, courtty, po!ltica! subdlvfs/on of the state or other appr+�ved ownersAlp conslstlr�g of s oollec�tion sy�stem and necessary trunks, pumping facll�les and means ot tlnal daat►nerrt and dtsposa! and approv�ed or under permlt from the Washington State Deparfinent of Ecology.) Transportation Mairttain travel corridar time ss establlshed by Spokane Reglonal Transportation Coundl. Ftoodin� of property outside designated drainage de dralnege easertfents, flood zones or other approved drainage fadlitlea, during the deslgn preclpitaUon or ninofl event prescxibed In the standards of the goveming local egency o� jurisdictlon, shall be prevented wtthin the reasonable probablllty effobed by such standards. Impact to bultdings and accessory Stormwater s��$ 5�� be avolded to tt�e maximum exter�t pracxicable by evaluadng the elfects ot a 1 a0- year raln eve�t, and impiementing measures to ensure that the n.mofF attendant to such eveM Is directed away from such buildings and acoessory structures. Arry stormwater dEscharge to surface or g�ound waters muat meet federal, state and local requlrements far water quality Veatment, stwrnvvater runoff and Infiltradon. Law Enforoeme�t Each )urfsdldfon shall spedfy In fts Comprehensive Plan a leve! ot pollce pmtec�or� that eddresses the safety of fts c�tze�s. Llbraries Each jurisdiction wlll spedfy its own level of servioe. p� Each Jurisdiction will spedfy fts own levei of aervlce. ( Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 4 of 58 City of Spokane Valiey Comprehensive Plan Tsbie 4.1 Reglonal L�vel ot 3ervice 3tandards FACIUTY LEVEL OF SERVICE STANOARD (LOS) Solid waste processing will meet Federal and State regulations, including maintalnin� any required Solid Waste faciliti�s licenses. Each Jurisdict�on within the non-atleinment area shall de�elop and use a street deaning plan, 000rdinatlng witli Spokane Cou�ty Alr PoAutlan Control Authcrfty (SCAPCA) as ttie ove�stght agency, to meet mandated Perticulate Matter dust standards. Each Jurisdic�on's sVeet cleaning plan wfll describe the progrems and methods to be used to reduce particulate matter emissions from paved surfaces. Each plan shall address but not be limited to the fotlowing: 1) Street Street CleaNng �p�� uency and technology to be employed. 2) Fadors for determining when and where to initiate street sweeping following e sanding event, with the goals of expeditious remova! when safety and mobility requir+ements have been saGisfied. 3) Sanding reduction goal. 4) Sanding materials specificatlons to be employed. � Locations, application rates and dreumstances for use of chemical de-icers and other sanding altemat�ves. 6) Ider�tification of priority roadways (over 15,000 average dafty Vaffic counq. Publlc Transft �urtsdictlons wlthln the Public Transft Benefit Area (PTBA) shall have polides conslstent wtth the level ot service adopted by the Spokane Transtt Authority Board af Directors. Urban areas jurisdictions in excess of 5,000 population, or once a population of 5,000 persons ts achieved, shall be served by Flre DisUict with at least s (Washin�ton Sun^ey and Rafing Bureau of Insurance Servk.�s Ofl`Ice) Class 8 Ins�uance Rating or better. For the purposes of GMA minimum Levels of Servloe, Class 6 or better shall be based on the ISO Grading Schedule for municipal �re protec�fon, 1974 edi�on, as amended, by using the fire d�SU1cl, flre servioe communicat(on, and fire safety contrd portions ot the grading sd�edute. The total deficiency polnts Identifled In these portions ai the ISO or Washington Survey and Radng 8ureau schedule shall not exceed 1,830 polnts. All )ur�sdldions, regardless of stze, shatl ens,�re that new development has a Fire Flow and Ffre and Emergency hydrartt plaoement per the Intemational Flre Code adopted by that jurisdictlon. Urban areas must Services � yWthin 5 road miles of an operating fire statlon that provldes service with a"Class A' pumper, unless struc�ures are equfpped with �re sprinkler(s) that are rated In eccordance with the edition of the Intematlonal Flre Code adopted by the Jurlsdiction, and Is located wlthin 5 road miles of an operatlng Rre statlon that provides servlce with a Class "A" rated pumper. Urban areas shaU be served by a state certifled baslc Il�e support (BLS) agency. Urban areas should be served by an operating basic tife saving unit within 5 miles; and an operating advanc�d life support u�it within 8 mlles or 10 m(nutes respor�se time fo� those jurfsdlctlons with urban are�s In excess of 5,000 In population; and basic I'�fe suppo�t and advanced life support transport service. Publlc Schools To be determined by indfvidual school d(sMd CFP. 2. Each jurisdiction and other providers of public services should use compatible information technologies to monitor demand for urban govemmental and regional services and the efficiency of planning and services delivery. 3. Each jurisdiction shall include policies in its comprehensive plan to ensure that obstructions to regional transportation or utility coRidors are not created. In addition, each jurisdiction should include policies in its comprehensive plan to ensure sustainable growth beyond the 20-year planning horizon. 7. Each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan shall include, at a minimum, the following policies to address adequate fire protection. a. Limit growth to areas served by a fire protection district or within the corporate limits of a city providing its own fire department. ( Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-Q7-2009� Chapter 4- Capital Faci(ities Page 5 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan b. Commercial and residential subdivisions and developments and residential planned unit developments shall inctude the provision fo� road access adequate for residents, fire departmer�t or district ingress/egress and water suppty for fire protection. c. Development in forested areas must provide defensible space between structure and adjacent fuels and require that fire-rated roofing materials be used. 9. Wellhead protection plans should be coordinated with water purveyors and implemented by locel jurisdictions. The Steering Committee shall pursue strategies for regional (to include Idaho jurisdictions) water resource management, which sustain projected growth rates and protect the environment. 10. Each jurisdiction shall include provisions in its comprehensive plan for the distribution of essential public facilities. 13. Each jurisdiction shall plan for growth within Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) which uses land efficiency, adds certainty to capital facilities planning and allows timely and coordinated extension of urban governmental services, public facilities and utilities for new development. Each jurisdiction shall identify intermediate growth areas (six to ten year increments) within its Urban Growth Area (UGA) or establish policies which direct growth consistent with land use and capital facility plans. Policy Topic 9— Fiscal Impacts Policies 1. Each jurisdiction shall identify, within the capital facilities element of its comprehensive plan, capital resources that will be available to accommodate the additional development which is anticipated within Urban Growth Areas (UGAs). 4.2 Essential Public FacllitiQs The City of Spokane Valley is required to plan for essential public facilities (EPFs) pursuant to GMA. Spokane County adopted through the CWPPs "Growth Management Essential Public Facilities Technical Committee Report" in 1996, which set forth a model project review process for the siting of EPFs. All jurisdictions within the County are required to provide a mechanism in the Comprehensive Plan to utilize the model project review process either verbatim or as a model. More recentfy, the Washington State Legislature passed two laws addressing siting of EPFs. In June 2001 the state enacted ESSB 6151, and in March 2002 the state enacted ESSB 6594. These laws require counties and cities fuliy planning under GMA to include a process in their Comprehensive Plans to provide for the siting of Secure Community Transition Facilities (SCTFs). A�"secure community transition facility" (SCTF) is the statutory name for a less restrictive alternative residential facility program operated or contracted by the Department of Social and Heafth Services. As stated in RCW 71.09.020, "... a secure community transition facility has supervision and security, and either provides or ensures the provision of sex offender treatment services." The program offers 24-hour intensive staffing and line-of-sight supervision by trained escorts when residents leave the facility. A less restrictive altemative (LRA) placement is defined in the state law as a living arrangement that is less restrictive than total co�inement. In response to these new state laws, planning staff firom all jurisdictions in Spokane County formed a task force to cooperativefy develop a regional siting process for all essential public facilities, including SCTFs. The Essential Public Facilities Task Force, with assistance from the Washington State Office of Community Development (OCD), the Department of Social and Health Seniices (DSHS), and technical staff from the jurisdictions developed a regional siting process for essential public facilities titled Spokane County Regiona! Sifing Process for Essenriel PubJic Facilities. Table 4.2 below lists EPFs that are either wholly or particalty of located within the Cit�r. The regional process provides for a review process with a location analysis. Public involvement takes place throughout the process with public comment periods as well as public hearings. The � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 6 of 58 City of Spokane Valiey Comprehensive Plan review process requires the applicant for an EPF to assume responsibility for the bulk of the analysis and processing of the proposal. The analysis includes two parts. First, an analysis of functional criteria of all potential sites is conducted to select the highest-ranking ten (10) semi- finafist sites. Second, these ten semi-finalist sites are analyzed using more qualitative criteria and resulting in selection of at least three (3) preferred sites. Both analyses include public comment periods. Next, the Board of County Commissioners (BoCC) conducts a public hearing on the Preferred Site List to allow for further public comment, identify strategies to address any issues associated with particular sites, and rank the finalist sites. The BoCC ranking is advisory to but not binding on the applicant. Last, the applicant, after selecting a specific site, will work directly with a local jurisdiction and its regulatory requirements to pennit construction and operation of the EPF. The regional siting process is based on a coordinated inter-jurisdictional approach, which in combination with consistent development regulations among the jurisdictions will implement the requirement of equitable dist�ibution of EPF of a statewide or regional/countywide nature. Tablo 4.2 Inwntay of �al Publk Rsdlitles 3fgnHtcanco Cat�gory Nama Addnss Statewide Regional Transportation Facilities Interstate 90 NlA -- - --+ — Statewtde� Reglonal Transportation Facilities � Cer�tennlal Trail N/A Regional Reg�onal Transportation Fadlities Pence-Cole Valley Park 8 Ride 414 S. University Rd . and Trar�siUTransfer Cente� Reglonal Reglonal Transporta�on Fadlitfes Pines Road/l 90 Perk 8 Rlde E. Monteamery, Pir�es Rd & I 90 Regional Regionsl Trensportation Facilities STA Malntenance - Bowdish � 23 S. Bvwdish (Fleck Service Centet) Regfonal Regional Tranaportadon Fadlities SR-27 (Plnes Road) N/A Regional Regio�al Transpartation Faalities ! SR-280 (Trern Avenue) NIA - —1- - Reqional � Solid Waste, Wastewater & Water FaGlities ' Val{ey Recycling-Transfer 3941 N. Sullivan Rd ! - -- — Valle Hospital 8� Medlql Reglonal Sodal Servioe Facftitles ' y Center �2606 E. Missian Ave Reglonal Sodal Service Facllftles ' ��n�j�aN�o�ral Health I 127�5 E. Mission Ave 4.3 Goals and Poli�ies The following goals and policies are consistent with the goals and policies of the GMA and the Countywide Planning Policies. The City of Spokane Valley will implement the goals and policies for services provided by the City. Special purpose districts, such as water, school, end fire, are encouraged to implement the goals and policies that are under their control. Spokane Valley intends to coorclinate with special purpose districts when they adopt a�d amend their own system plans and capital improvement programs. General Goal CFG-1 Provide facilities and services that the City can most effectively dellver, and contract or franchise for those facllities and servlces that the City detennines can best be provided by a speclal district, other jurisdiction, or the prfvate sector. Policies CFP-1.1 Review plans of service providers within Spokane Valley to determine consistency with the SVCP. ( Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated Q1-Q7-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 7 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehenshre Plan CFP-1.2 The City should seek a balance between the quality and cost of providing public facilities and services. CFP-1.3 Optimize the use of existing public facilities and promote orderiy compact urban growth. CFP-1.4 Coorciinate the construction of public infrastructure with private development to minimize costs whenever practicable and feasible. Capftal Facilitfes Planning and Level of Service Goal CFG-2 Adopt and implement a Capital Facilfties Plan to ensure public facilities and servlces meet Level of Service Standa�ds. Policies CFP-2.1 Facilities and services shall meet the following minimum Level of Service standards: TabIQ �.3 Spokat�v Valley Leve! o! 3ervlco Stsndards Facllity or 8srvics Lovel oi Service Standard Domestic Wate� Meet the minimum Regional LOS' Sewer Public sewe� requlred for new developmerrt LOS D tor Slgnaltzed Irttersectlons Transpartadon LOS E far Un-slgnatlzed Interset�ons Stormwater Meet the minimum Regional LOS• Law Enfo�cement No mfntmum LOS adopted Parica 1.92 ecres per 1000 residents Ubraries Library District to set LOS Solid Waste Meet the minimum Regional LOS' Street C{eaning Meet the minimum Regional LOS' Public Trartsit Meet tfie minimum Regional LOS' Flre and EMS Meet the minlmum Reglonal LOS' Publlc Schools School Distrids to set LOS ' See Page 4 for Regtonal LOS standards CFP-2.2 Update the City's Capitel Facilities Plan annually to ensure that services and facilities are provided efficiently and effectively and to help establish budget priorities. CFP-2.3 Planned expenditures for capital improvements shall not exceed estimated revenues. CFP-2.4 If adopted level of service standards cannot be maintained, the City shall increase funding, reduce level of service standards or reassess the Land Use Element. � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200,9, Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 8 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Public Safety - Fire and Police Goal CFG-3 Provide police protection efficiently and cost effectively to Spokane Valley residents. Coordinate with flre districts to ensure adequate flre protectlon and emergency services for Spokane Vailey citizens. Policies CFP-3.1 Encourage inter-jurisdictional cooperation among law enforcement agencies and fire districts to further develop, where practical, shared sen�ice and facility use. CFP-3.2 Develop a comprehensive emergency management plan that meets the needs of the City and coordinates with regional emergency planning efforts. CFP-3.3 Require adequate emergency vehicle road access and water supply/pressure for new development within the City. CFP-3.4 Encourage property owners to create a defensible space between structures and adjacent fuels and require that fire rated roofing materials are used on buildings in forested areas. Water and Sewer Goal CFG-4 Plans for water and sewer service should be consistent with the SVCP. Policies CFP-4.1 Review water and sewer plans to determine consistency with anticipated population growth, future land uses, comprehensive plan land use policies and development regulations. CFP-4.2 Coordinate sewer planning with appropriate jurisdictions for consistency with the � SVCP. CFP-4.3 Support continued planning for domestic water needs in partnership with water purveyors, the Joint Aquifer Board, Washington State Department of Health and the Washington State Department of Ecology. CFP-4.4 Encourage public and private efforts to conserve water. CFP-4.5 Discourage new, private domestic wells within the Spokane Valley City limits. CFP New development must connect to public sewer and water. Solid Waste Goal CFG-5 Promote the reduction, re-use and recycling of solid waste. Policies CFP-5.1 Establish a City Hall recycling program to present a positive example of civic and environmental responsibility. CFP-5.2 Participate in updates to the Spokane County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management plan and support its impfementation. Stormwater Goal CFG-6 Ensure the provision of stormwater facilitles and related management programs that protect surface and groundwater quality, prevent chronic flooding from stormwater, maintain natural stream hydrology and protect aquatic resources. � Adopted April 25, 20Q6 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 9 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehens'rve Pian w Policies CFP-6.1 Require stomnwater management systems for new development. CFP-6.2 Create and implement a stormwater management plan to reduce impacts from urban runoff. CFP-6.3 Best management practices should be utilized to treat stormwater runoff prior to absorption of runoff into the ground. CFP-6.4 New development should include the muttiple uses of facilities, such as the integration of stormwater facilities with recreation and/or open space areas, when possible. CFP-6.5 Encourage the use of altematives to impervious surfaces. Library Service Goal CFG-7 Promote efflcient and cost effective library service to Spokane Valley residents. Policies CFP-7.1 Encourage continued free, re�iprocal library services among all libraries within the Spokane region. CFP-7.2 Lend use regulations should allow siting of library facilities in locations convenient to residential areas. CFP-7.3 Worlc collaboratively with the Spokane County Library District to develop long- range library plans consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Schools Goal CFG-8 School sltes and facilities should meet the educatlon needs of Spokane Valley citizens. Policies CFP-8.1 Develop land use designations that allow new schools where they will best serve the community. CFP-8.2 Consider the adequacy of school facilities when reviewing new residential development. CFP-8.3 Assist school districts in their planning processes. Concu�rency (3oal CFG-9 New development shall be served with adequate facilities and senrlces at the tlme of development, or within the time frame consistent with state law. Policies CFP-9.1 Implement a concurrency management system for transportation, water and sewer facilities. Financing Growth Goal CFO-10 Conslder a variety of revenue sources and fundfng mechanisms including, but not Iimited to, Impact fees. Policies CFP-10.1 Identify and pursue sources of revenue for financing public facilities. � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated Q�„-�QZ-2009� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 10 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Essentfal Public Facilities Goal CFG-11 Coilaborate wfth all Spokane County jurisdictlons in determining the best locations for public and private essentlal public facilities. Policies CFP-11.1 Follow the process for s�ting essential public facilities as set forth in the Spokane County Regional Siting Process for Essential Public Facilities. Potential Annexatton Areas Goal CFG-12 Provide capital facilities to serve and direct future qrowth within the Citv of Spokane Vallev Potentlal Annexation Areas Policies CFP Plan and coordinate the location of �ublic facilities and utilities in the aotential annexation areas CFP-12.2 Considering, in advance, proQerty acpuisition oaQOrtunities for future facilities including but not limited to parks, police facilities, stormwater facilities, areenbelts. open space. and street connectians CFP-12.3 Coordinate with adjacent jurisdictions in develo�ina caqital improvement croarams and studies addressinq multi-iurisdictional issues 4.4 Caaftal Facilities Plan 4.4.1 Introductfon The Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) provides an analysis of the facilities and services required to . support the future land use and growth projected in the Comprehensive Plan. The CFP includes a six year capital projects and a financing plan for facilities provided by the City. The finance plan identifies specific revenue sources that the City reasonably anticipates will be available in the year the project is scheduled to be constructed. The CFP includes Level of Service (LOS) standards for each public facility or service and requires that new development be served by adequate facilities. The purpose of the CFP is to use sound fiscal policies to provide adequate public facilities consistent with the land use element and concurre�t with, or prior to, the impacts of development. 4.4.2 Growth Assumption On November 30, 2004, #he Spokane County Board of Commissioners approved Spokane Valley's requested population allocation of 20,666 people. The allocation is the amount of people the City can accommodate within its current boundary. Spokane Valley considers this an "interim" allocation until wastewater treatment capacity issues are resotved. Because Spokane Valley did not request an allocation outside of its City limits, facilities required to serve Urban Growth Areas adjacent to the City are not analyzed in this plan. These areas are under the jurisdiction of Spokane County; therefore, capital facilities planning activities within UGAs will continue to be the County's responsibility. The following population data is used for capital facilities planning purposes: Tabl� 4.� Populaiton Proj�ctlon I Year ��e2048 Z012 2025 I Populatlon 8b;n��88,920 92�243 103�676 4.4.3 Levet of Servlce � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009� Chapter 4- Capital Facil�ties Page 11 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehenslve Plan � Cities are often defined by the quality of facilities and services that are provided to its residents. Good road, sewer and water infrastructure are typical criteria used by businesses considering relocatlon. Park and recreation facilities are increasingly used to judge the quality of a City. Businesses want to locate where they can attract the best employees, and quality of life issues are often the deciding factor for a person to move to a new area. Level of service standards are quantifiable measures, such as acres of parks per 1000 people, or the amourrt of time it takes to travel a road segment during peak moming and aftemoon "rush hours,' the higher the level of service the higher the cost. This element establishes levels of service which will be used to evaluate the adequacy and future cost of urban facilities and services. 4.4.4 Concurrency The Growth Management Act introduces the concept of concurrency, which requires new development to be served with adequate urban services at the time of development, or within a specified tirne thereafter. The GMA allows six years for necessary transportation improvements to be constructed as long as a financial commitment is made at the time of development. The GMA strongly encourages concurrency for water and sewer, and it is good public policy to require the same. 4.4.5 Financing Facilities and Services The City is limited in its ability to finance all desired capital facility projects. Options must be available for addressing funding shortfalls or decisions must be made to lower levels of service for public facilities. In deciding how to address a particular shortfall, the City will need to balance current needs versus future growth requirements; existing deficiencies versus future expansions. Capital facilities plans must be balanced. When funding shortfalls occur, the following options should be considered: a. Increase revenues, b. decrease level of service standards, c. decrease the cost of the service or facility, d. decrease the demand for the service or facility, e. or some combination of the above. The following table presents possible financial resources available to the City for capital projects. Table 4 .a F�nar� R�ou� Funding Cat�gory Funding Sou�ca General Fund (Sales Tax, fees, property tax, utlliry tax, etc.) Current Revenues Real Estate Exdse Tax (REE� Impad Fees Non-vated Generaf Obllgation Voted General Obllga�on Bonds Reve�ue (payable from a partJculer utllity or enterprise) Lxal Impraveme�t D(strid (Assessmeni Bonds) Surface Transportatlon Program Bridge ReplacemeM Funds Federal Grants Congestlon Mitigation and Ai� Quality Improv�eme� Program (CMAQ) Lend and Water Cortservatlon Fund Communtty Davelopment Block Grar�ts � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 12 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.5 Fundlnp R�scurcas Fundin9 Catogory Funding Sourca Aquatic LandS Enhancement Account (ALEA) Transportatfon Improvement Account Cerrtennial Clean Water Fund Pubfic Wofks Tn�st Funds State Grants/toans Interagency for Committee for Outdoor Recxeation (lAC) Arterfa! Street Fund (Motor Fuel Tax) Urban Arterlal Trust Aooaunt (UATA) Aqua�c Lands Enhancement Account Hazardous B�idge Repiacement Developer Contribudons Other ponations Local Improvement Dlstricis 4.4.6 Impact Fees New growth creates a demand for new and expanded public facilities and services. The GMA authorizes local govemments to impose and collect impact fees to partialfy fund public facilities to accommodate new growth. Impact fees can be used to pay for new or expanded facilities and cannot be collected to address existing infrastructure deficiencies. The GMA allows impact fees to be assessed on the following: • Public Streets and Roads � Public Parfcs • Schools • Open Space • Fire Protection Facilities • Recreation Facilities The City has not enacted impact fees as a funding mechanism for capital facilities, but may study the issue as directed by future City policy. 4.4.7 Community Facilities This section of the CFP includes civic buildings such as govemment offices, community centers, and entertainment facilities. As a new City, Spokane Valley does not have a significant inventory of community facilities. Inventory of Existing Facilitles Spokane Valley completed construction of CenterPlace at Mirabeau Point Park, in the summer, 2005. The facitity houses the Spokane Valley Senior Center, conference facilities, classrooms and a"great room" for events. CenterPlace has a dining capacity of 400 and includes a full commercial kitchen. Spokane Valley leases office and meeting space for employees and City Council in the Redwood Plaza office building, located at 11707 East Sprague Avenue. Spokane Valley also leases precinct and court space at the Valley Precinct Building located 12710 East Sprague. Level of Service Spokane Valley does not propose to adopt a level of service standard for community facilities. Forecast of Future Needs � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 13 of 58 City of Spokane Vailey Comprehensive Plan � The need for new community facilities is difficult to quantify and depends on the future structure of City govemment. If Spokane Valley continues to contract for senrices such as police, parks and road maintenance, the need to acquire and maintain facilities will be minimal. However, if Spokane Valley begins providing these services, there will be a corresponding need for administrative office space and other facilities. For example, if Spokane Valley assumes responsibility for parks maintenance, a new maintenance facility would have to be constructed to house equipment and employees. At some future point, Spokane Valley will likely purchase an existing building or construct a new building to house City Hall. This decision must be made with thought and vision. In the right location, City Hall will be the center for civic affairs and community events and will influence economic development and the creation of a City Center. The location should be centralized and accessible to all citizens. Nearly three-quarters of the Cit�zen Survey respondents support using public money to help create a City Center. Locating a civic building, such es City Hall, in the City Center would be a significant catalyst to creating a distinct center and identity for Spokane Valley. Locatlons and Capacides of Future Facilkles Spokane Valley cumentiy has no specffic plans to construct new community facilities. The City must decide the location of a permanent City Hall and/or other civic buildings. Future updates to the Capital Facilities element will include information on locations and capacities for community facilities. Capltal Projects and Financing Plan Spokane Valley anticipates either constructing a new City Hall building, or purchasing and remodeling an existing building within the six year time frame of this CFP. The following table shows that Spokane Valley will use approximately �1,000,000 of Real Estate Excise Tax revenue for Civic Buildings. Table 4.8 Community Facilities Financing Plan Pro}�t 2006 200T 2�08 2CQ8 2010 2011 201 Z Tohl Civic Facllities � 563 550 750 1,300 3,163 ' -L -- i Total O 0 0 563 550 750 1,300 • 3,163 Revenue Sou�ce Real Estate Excise Tax � 250 250 , 400 1 �0 1,Q00 � � General Fund 313 , 300 ` 350 i 1,200 ; 2,163 � � , - — - � � � i Total I 0 I 0 � Q � 563 � 550 750 � 1,300 � 3,163 4.4.8 Domestic Water The City of Spokane Valley does not own or operate a public water supply system. Rather, water is provided to Spokane Valley residences and businesses by special purpose districts, associations, and public and private corporations. Water service is coordinated by Spokane County through the Coordinated Water System Plan (CWSP), which identifies service boundaries, establishes minimum design standards and promotes the consolidation of regional water resource management. The CWSP is updated as needed at the direction of the Board of County Commissioners or the Washington State Department of Heatth (DOH). � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Cap�tal Facilities Page 14 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Pian The City of Spokane Valley is supportive of existing regional water supply pianning, water use efficiency programs and plans, watershed planning, wellhead protection plans, water quality plans, and planning for reclamation and reuse. �; ��. •� Water Systems � � Water systems are categorized generally � by the number of connections served; Group A systems provide service to 15 or more connections while Group B systems :=� �� serve 2 to 14 connections. Spokane - Valley has 25 Group A systems and 13 , � Group B systems providing water service =-- within the City. A detailed inventory of -. � water systems is shown below in the ;�-�" � � inventory section. Water System Plans The Washington State Department of Health recommends that all water purveyors prepare a water system plan to determine future needs for water facilities within their service areas. The plans must include an existing facility inventory, project future needs for water supply, conservation strategies, and identify and provide for the protection of aquifers against contaminates. Once a water system plan is adopted, it must be updated every six years. The Departrnent of Health is the approval authori#y for water system plens. Weter purveyors meeting the fo{lowing criteria ere required to have water system plans approved by DOH. 1. Systems having 1000 or more connections. 2. Systems required to develop water system plans under the Public Water System Coordination Act of 1977 (Chapter 70.116 RCV1�. 3. Any system experiencing problems related to planning, operation and/or management as determined by the Depa�tment of Health. 4. All new systems. 5. Any expanding system. 6. Any system proposing to use the document submittal exception process in WAC 246-290- 125 (documents such as project reports and constructions drawings). In 2003, the Washington State Legislation passed what is commonly referred to as the 'Municipal Water Law" (MWL), amending sections of the State Board of Health Code (RCW 43.2�}; the laws governing Public Water Systems (RCW70.119A); and sections of the state's Water Code (RCW 90.03). The MWL requires that water system planning documents must be consistent with Spokane Valley's Comprehensive Plan and development regulations. The Department of Heatth is developing procedures that water systems must follow to ensure coordination with local jurisdictions and consistency with growth planning. Water Rights Washington State water law requires all prospective water uses to obtain a water right permit from the Department of Ecology (DOE) before constructing a well or withdrawing any groundwater from a well. However, the law does allow a water right permit exemption, referred to as the domestic exemption, which states that no water right permit is required for the withdrawal of up to 5,000 gallons of water per day from a well when the water is being used for the following: 1. Livestock watering. 2. Single or group domestic water supply. 3. Industrial purposes. � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 15 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan w 4. Irrigation of no more than one half acre of lawn or noncommercial garden (RCW 90.44.050). For many years, Ecology issued water right certificates to water suppliers based on prujected future use, rather than ectual "beneficial use." The unused portlons of those certificates or rights are known as "inchoate" rights, which could potentially be taken away by Ecology if not put to beneficial use. This situation was troubling to municipal water suppliers. Public water systems need a level of certainty to obtain financing for capital facilities as well as to issue letters of water availability to development interests. The "Municipal Water Law: of 2003° clarified that cities are entitled to inchoate (unused) water for the purpose of serving expanding areas. This ensures that municipalities have sufficient water for anticipated growth based on the communities' comprehensive plans and water and supply plans. Watershed Planning In 1998, Washington State passed the Watershed Management Act to develop a"thorough and cooperetive method of detemnining what the current water resource situation is in each Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) of the state and to provide local citizens with the maximum possible input conceming their goals and objectives for water resource management and development" (RCW 90.82.005). In late 1998, a Planning Unit was formed for WRIAs 55 and 57, or the Middle Spokane-Little Spokane River watersheds, with Spokane County designated as the tead agency. The Watershed Management Act requires the Planning Unit to address water quantity issues and allows water quality, habitat and in-stream flows to be considered in the process. The watershed planning effort is expected to produce information on how water is used in the Water Resource Inventory Areas and recommendations for how it should be used in the future. The Planning Unit may also formulate a recommendation for in-stream flaws for the Spokane and Little Spokane Rivers. The Department of Ecology may establish minimum water flows or levels for streams, lakes or other public waters for the purpose of protecting fish, game, birds or other wildlife resources, or recreational or aesthetic values of said public waters whenever it appears to be in the pub{ic interest to do so. The data, information and recommendations generated by the Planning Unit may be used by the Department of Ecology to assess the ability to issue new water rights for the Spokane Valley- Rathdn.im Prairie Aquifer. The WRIA 55 and 57 planning process will provide a basis for better understanding of potential water resource limits and will be incorporated into future updates to this capital facilities plan. Inventory of Water Systems Most of the water used by Spokane Valley residents and businesses is provided by water and imgation districts and small water systems, listed in Tables 4.7 and 4.8 and shown on the Water Districts and Wellheads map, located at the end of this chapter. The City of Spokane provides water to the western portions of Spokane Valley, totaling approximately 620 connections. Group A water systems are those which have 15 or more service connections or �egularly serve 25 or more people fi0 or more days per year. Group B water systems serve two to 14 connections and are not subject to the federal Safe Drinking Water Act. Instead, they must meet state and local requirements for water quality and operations. ( Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009�J Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 16 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Tablo 4.7 SpoksrN Vatlay Wat�� Punnyora • Oroup A 8ysisms Curront Resldentlal Cumant Non Rosidontial stO�a� Oroup A Systams Connectio�a Conn�ctiorn Capactty (osllons) Bayou On Barker 0 4 0 Burger Rayal 4 - �-- - - 50 I Gamhope IMgadon Distrid 7 � 455 0 0 Central Pre M'uc - Sullivan Rd 4 4 0 — - � Cit�r Oi Spokane' 59700' 0 Not reported Consofidated Irtig Dist 19 S�IStem 1 3063 51 ' 2,750,000 CoRSOlidated Irtig Dist 19 System 2 3663 141 2,200,000 East Spakane VVater Dist 1 1158 84 1,027,000 Hutchinson Irrigation Dist #16 790 0 1.200,000 Honeywell Electronlc Mfg LLC 0 1 0 Irvin Water Dlstrid #8 757 0 1,900,000 Ka(ser Alum - Trentwood Worica 0 2 21,200 Model iRigation Dist #18 2116 4 550,000 Modem Eiectric Weter Co 4302 ; 0 1,500,000 Orchard Avenue irrigation Dist 8 1186 0 0 i Ptnecroft Moblle Home Park 143 ' 0 400 PuerCe Vallerte 0 1 0 Spitfl�e Pub And Eatery 0 2 87 Spokane Business & Ind�trial Pa�1c '— 0 � 237 478,000 Spokane Co - Mirabeau Park 0 2 200 Spokane Co Water Dlst #3 i 9788 426 6,880,000 Trerttw�ood Irrigation Dlstrtd 3 1470 0 1,120,000 __ ' Vera Water � Pow�er i 6652 i 0 8,650,000 Woodland Park Trafler Court 30 � 0 i 0 ' Approximately 620 connections within Cliyr ot Spokene Valley Source; Washinpt�n State DepartrneM ol Wealth Tabfe 4.s Group B 8ystems Oroup 8 Systertt Connectlo�s Holiday Trailer Court 12 Janzen 8 Janzen 1 Levem)er Const. Water System 1 Mercer Trucicing Co Inc I 1 Middco Tool 8 Equipment 1 Systems Transport Inc 1 Td Water System 6 Tds -- -- 2 � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-�7-2009� Chapter 4- Capitai Facilities Page 17 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Unlon Padflc Raltroad - Trentwood i 1 Weatco S Apparel Senilce I 3 1Mestem Struc�ures Inc j 2 WSOT-Pinea Road Meintenance - - - 1 Source: Washington Stats DQpartment of Hoafth � Level of Service The Countywide Planning Policies were amended in 2004 to defer level of service standards for water supply and fire flow to the requirements of the Department of Health and local fire codes respectively. Forecast of Future Needs Spokane Val{ey adopts by reference water system plans fo� all water purveyors providing service within the City of Spokane Valley. Locations and Capackies of Future Facillties Spokane Valley adopts by reference water system plans for all water purveyors providing service within the City of Spokane Valley. Capital ProJects and Financing Plan Spokane Valley adopts by reference capital project and financing plans for all water purveyors providing service within the Cit�r of Spokane Valley. Fire Protection and Emergency Medical Service - Fire protection and emergency medical services (EMS) are provided by Spokane Valley Fire � Department (District No. 1) and Spokane County . i Fire District No. 8. Spokane Valley Fire serves over -� 90% of the Valley, while District 8 serves a few : small areas in the southem part of the City (see Fire . j = Districts Map at the end of this chapter). Both �'� �� -- ==- dis tri c ts serve the Ci t y with a full ran ge of fire �� " suppression and EMS services. Spokane Valley voters chose to annex to Spokane Valley Fire and District No. 6 in September, 2004. Insurance Radng City fire departments and fire protection districts are assigned a numerical fire protection rating by the Washington Surveying and Ratings Bureau. Insurance companies fund the Bureau to perform on-site inspections of fire districts to determine the rating. The Bureau analyzes five main areas: average response time, water supply, communication network, schedule of fire inspections and fire station evaluations (which focus on age of vehicles), personnel training and staffing of facilities. Insurance companies use the fire protection rating to help determine insurance rates on all fire insurance policies. The rating is on a scale of one to ten, with one representing the best score. Quality of flre service can have a signficant impact on fire insurance rates, particularty for commercial businesses. As of April, 2006, Spokane Valley Fire Department has a Fire Insurance Rating of four and District No. 8 has a Rating of five, both indicating good fire protection. Inve�tory of Existing Facilities and Apparatus The Fire Districts Map shows the location of fire stations and service area boundaries for Spokane Valley Fire, District No. 8 and surrounding fire protection districts. All fire agencies have mutual aid agreements to assist each other in major emergencies. � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 18 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Spokane Valley Fire 2006 apparatus inventory includes nine Class A engines, two Class A pumper/ladders, two medic vehicles, three brush trucks and other miscellaneous vehicles for staff, training, rescue, maintenance, prevention and command. Spokane Valley Fire has ten stations, including eight within the City of Spokane Valley. Locations of the stations are as follows: T�bi� 4.9 Spokan� Vall�y Flr� Dlst�{ct SbUon Locatbns Station 1' 10319 East Sprague Station 2' `� 8007 East TreM Statlon 3 2218 North Harvard Station 4 22408 East Wellesley StaUon 5' 15510 East Marlette Station 6• ' 6306 East Sprague Station 7' 1121 Soutfi Eve�green -- Staaon 8' North 2110 Wflbur Station 9 East 11514 16'' Statfon 10" East 17217 Sprague ' Inslde Spokane Valley Cfty Umits '• Medic-only station Fire District No. 8 has one fire station inside the City limits, station 84 in the Ponderosa neighborhood, located at 4410 South Bates. The District has two stations located outside the City limits providing additional coverage, No. 81 at 6117 South Palouse Highway and No. 85 at 3324 South Linke Road. Stations 81 and 84 each have two Class A engines and two wildland brush engines. Station 85 has one Class A engine and one wildland brush engine. Level of Service Spokane Valley Fire's Level of Senrice goals for response time are as follows: • 5:00 minutes - 80% of the time for fire calls • 5:00 minutes - 80°� of the time for Basic Life Support (BLS) • 8:00 minutes - 80% of the time for Advanced Life Support (ALS) Basic Life Support refers to a level of training that does not involve any advanced medical procedures or administration of drugs. BLS providers can provide basic life saving and life sustaining jnterventions while transporting a patient to a hospital. This is the foundation on which all medical care is built. Good basic life support is key to survival of critically sick and injured patients. Advanced Life Support refers to a certain levet of care that may be provided to a patient by rescue squad members, if necessary. Members trained in Advanced Life Support techniques are often referred to as ALS providers. Among other procedures, ALS providers are able to administer certain life-saving medications, perform advanced monitoring of heart rhythms, and are trained to perfoRn advanced procedures to open and manage a patient's airway. Average response times for fire calls the past 4 years are as follows: • 2003 - 5 minutes 22 seconds • 2002 - 5 minutes 27 seconds � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 19 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan • 2001 - 5 minutes 28 seconds • 2000 - 5 minutes 35 seconds The Distcict's historic response time data does not distinguish between types of calis. Future data coliection will divide calls between fire, ALS and BLS. Spokane Valley Fire has responded to an average 7,746 calls per year from 2000 to 2003. The following table shows the number of calls per year. Tab{e 4.10 Dtstri�t i Firo Responses Yoar � 2000 2001 2002 Z003 Responses I 7594 , 7406 7821 � 8165 The Counfywide Planning Policies for Spokane County establishes minimum levels of service for fire and emergency medical services as follows: Urban a�eas are required to be serviced by a Fire District with at least a Class Six Insurance rating. • Urban areas must be within five road miles of an operating fire station that provides service with a'Class A' pumper, unless sUuctures are equipped with fire sprinklers. • Urban areas shall be served by a state certified basic life support (BLS) agency within five miles and an operating advanced life support unit within six miles or ten minutes response time. Both Fire District 1 and 8 meet the minimum countywide level of service standards. Forecast of Future Needs Spokane Valley Fire has identified two areas within the City of Spokane Valley that need improvement in response times and is planning to construct new stations to provide improved service levels. The most urgent need is to provide better coverage to the south valley, and the District is planning to move Station No. 9 to the vicinity of 32 Ave. and Pines Rd. The northeast area of the City is underdeveloped at present but as the City grows over the next ten to fifteen years, the District recognizes that a new station will need to be construc�ed to provide an adequate level of service. The station will be constructed in the vicinity of Barker and Euclid. Locations and Capacities of Future Fac(Ifties Station No. 9 will be moved from its cument location at 11514 East 16�' to the vicinity of 32'� and Pines. The station will include two bays and dorms for eight personnel. The District plans to reconstruct Station No. 10 into a three bay facjlity with dorms for ten personnel. Station No. 11 will be located in the vicinity of Barker and Euclid and will also be two bays with dorms for eight personnel. Construction for Station 11 is tentatively planned for 2014 or 2015. Capital ProJects and Flnancing Plan Spokane Valley Fire Department is a junior taxing authority that supplements its regular taxes with special levies. As the restrictions on the taxes generated from the regular tax go down, special levies are proposed to maintain needed funding. Special levies must be approved by Fire District voters. The Department does not use its bonding capacity to fund capital projects. The Department's philosophy is to reserve funds generated through its regular revenues for future capital needs. The following table represents the Valley Fire planned capital expenditures. � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009� Chapter 4- Capital Facilit+es Page 20 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Tabi� 4.11 Spokarw Valtay Fire 6-yas� Capttal ProJocts and Financin� Plan ProJ�ct 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 i Total Fire Station No. 9 � �� i � 31,000 i + I $1,800 (new construction) Fire Statior� No. 10 � I - - . — (reconstructlon) 31,800 $1,800 i � Total � � $1,000 $1,800 $2,800 i i Note: Reserve funds fram regular districi taxes will fund capital ImprovemeMs. (Amounts are times $1,000) 4.4.9 Library Service Library services are provided by the Spokane County Library District. The District has a long history of excellent service and upon incorporation, the Cit�r of Spokane Valley executed a one-year contract with the District for continued service. After the initial year, Spokane Valley and the Library District agreed to a five year contract for library seniices beginning in 2005. Eighty-seven percent of voters approved annexing back into the District in a May 20Q5 special election, with the annexation effective January 1, 2006. Facility Planning After incorporation, the Library District and the City of Spokane Valley collaborated on developing a new capital facilities plan for the District. In March 2004, the capital facilities planning process began and a sign�cant amount of information was gathered, including: , • Comparisons with library facilities in other similar sized Washington cities • Spokane Valley demographics • Public library facility standards • An analysis of current Spokane Valley area libraries • Pros and cons of various facility alternatives and • Community research Public Particlpation The Library District and the City of Spokane Valley conducted a random sample survey of Spokane Valley residents in March and April of 2004. The survey gathered information on local library use, satisfaction with library services and preferences regarding future library services. The District also conducted a community open house in May 2004, attended by 75 people, 75% of which were City residents. Information was obtained on satisfaction with facilities and service, facility improvement options, preferred library locations if a new main library were to replace the cur�ent Valley Library, constructing either one or two new branches, and willingness to pay for new libraries. Research Conclusions Analysis of information gathered leads to the conclusion that additional library space is needed to serve Spokane Valley residents. It is also determined that expanding the current Valley Library isn't a viable altemative. The community input showed a very high leve! (98%) of overall satisfaction with library services and a high level of satisfaction with current facilities. The public identified two areas needing improvement - materials availability, which requires a larger library, and public � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 21 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan - access computer availability. Only a modest interest in funding new facilities was expressed, demonstrating a strong need for community education about future library facilities needs. Communfty Survey Spokane Valley's Community Preference Survey included a question to gauge Spokane Valley citizen's satisfaction with current Library services. � The majority of survey respondents viewed library '. services in a positive light, with 83°� af ,�'- �" �' `' , respondents reporting that library services were I. � ,ri�� :- ' � � — - - _ �- good, very good or excellent. �'�s ` � � T, , • � � � •. � ,,.-_- � Inventory of Existlng Facilitles � . . , . ; � Spokane Valley has one library located inside its boundary, the District's Valley Branch, located at 12004 East Main. This resource library is the District's largest facility, measuring 22,100 square feet, including administrative space. The District has two other libraries within the greater Valley area located at 4322 North Argonne and 22324 East Wellesley in Otis Orchards. As of May 2004, 35,544 Spokane Valley residents were Libra District cardholders. Valley Library was the primary branch of registration, with Argonne v �� second and Otis Orchards third. Spokane County Library District has a reciprocal library card agreement with the City of Spokane with over 1,500 Spokane E�re�dwsyAv Valley residents owning a Spokane public library card. v�wr e� i w Level of Serv(ce s � g � . The Spokane County Library District has not � � � i 1Gf� Av established a level of service. �, Forecast of Future Needs The District uses a target Spokane Valley population of 105,000 for its future projections, which is consistent with the City of Spokane Valley's population allocation for growth within the existing City limits. The District recognizes that a new library needs to be built inside Spokane Valley to provide adequate (ibrary services. Future facilities will be divided between a main branch and a future neighborhood branch. Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities The main branch should measure about 49,000 square feet to adequately serve a population of 84,000 people. The main b�anch should be located on an arterial street within about one mile of the Sprague corridor between Dartmouth and Sullivan Roads. A neighborhood branch of approximately 15,000 square feet serving a population of 20,000 would ideally be located within two to three miles of the main branch. Capital Projects and Financing Plan The future main branch is estimated to cost $11.4 million in 2004 dollers; the neighborhood branch would cost about $3.6 million. Voter-approved general obligation bonds are the normal financing method for library projects of this size. The District proposes the following capital improvement schedule: 1 to 5 years • Determine preferred locations for new libraries. • Develop funding plan. • Purchase land for libraries. � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 22 of 58 City of Spokana Valley Comprehensive Plan 5 to 10 years • Secure funding and purchase site(s) if not already done. • Construct new main branch. • Sell existing Valley branch. 10 to 20 years • Secure funding and construct neighborhood branch. Table 4.12 Spoksn� County Library District s!x yaar Capfbl ProJQCts and Financing Ptan Proj�ct � 2006 2007 2008 2009 Z010 Z011 � 2012 Total New Spokane Val{ey �� S150 S1,700 $8,340 $6,750 0 0 519,000 Ubrary � Total � 5100 a150 � 51,700 58,300 � 58,750 � 0 0 � 519,000 i Rsv�nw Sourc�s ' � , . , GO Bonds $10� S150 S1,700 S8,500 S8,750 0 0 � 19000 � Totel i s100 s150 =1,700 :8,500 S8 i 0 � 0 � 19000 � Note: The majoriry oi General Fund expenses incurred In 2006 and 2007 are reimbursabte from voter-approved bond funds. The Library District will continue to work with the City of Spokane Valley to further develop plans to construct new libraries. As plans are updated and refined, this Capital Facilities Plan will be amended to incorporate future changes. Operationat Costs � The Library District assumes that with efficient building design and continuing staff productivity � improvements, a larger Valley Library and an eventual new branch can be operated at normal District funding levels of 50 cents per a1,000 of assessed valuation. 4.4.10 Parks and Recreatlon Spokene Valley has a wide range of , _ recreational opportunities available to residents . .- ' ; ,� _ ' ^ � and visitors. City parks, school play fields, goif •. ,� :�.. � �, � '� � '�: `. ?=. courses, trails, County parks and conservations ` ��' ';��-� .. areas are all within close vicinity to Spokane ,� � �- '��';.: � Valley residents. � � - � � ='t,� ' � �� ' ' ``� - �� - ; The City provides a system of local parics that is � ;: �- .� :_� managed by the Spokane Valley Parks and �= ' � �+ � - � , � ,� . ~ - �- Recreation Department. The Parks Department _�� is in the process of developing a new Parks, -� - -_ - Recreation, and Open Spaces Master Plan. — When finished, this plan will offer a detailed picture of the park, recreation and open space system, including changes and improvements _ that will be made in the future. " This section of the Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) provides summaries of the parics inventory, level of service (LOS), future park needs, proposed projects, and a financing plan for the next six years. Park Types � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 23 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Parks are classified by their size, service area and function. Spokane Valley uses the nationally recognized Park, Recr�ation, Open Space arrd Greenway Guidelines, to establish standard for parks planning. Major classifications include mini-park, neighborhood, school-park, community, large urban, various trail designations and special use facifities. The Parks Element, Chapter 9, provides a thorough description of park types used for planning purposes. Inventory of Ex�sting Facllitles The Parks Map, found at the end of this Chapter, shows the location of all parks within Spokane Valley. Table 4.13 provides an inventory of park and recreation facilities owned by Spokane Valley. These parks are used to calculate Spokane Valley's level of service for partcs. The Parks Master Plan provides the most detailed inventory of parlcs, including equipment, struc#ures and other miscellaneous park facilities. Tabla 4.13 5poicsn� Vatley Park Facllltiss Spokatw Valloy Parfu Acrea�e Ststus Neighborhood Parks Balfour Park - - --- --- — - - 2.88 Developed - - Browms Perk - - . _ _. _ — - -� ----- . 8.03 Developed Castie Park � 2.71 Mlnimally Developed Edgediff Partt 4.74 Developed TeRace Vfew Park ' 9.2� � Qeve�oped Subtotal 2T.68 Community Parks _ - �-- - - --- -- Valley Mlasion Park � 21.91 Develaped f Subtotal 21.91 Lat�pe Urban Psrics - -- - - - -- - Mlrabeau PoIM Park i 41.91 Devdoped 8ubtotal ' 41.91 3pecial Use Ares�s — - - - - - -- - - i Park Road Pool I 2.00 Develaped Su111van Par1c --- -- 18.07 Developed Valley Senlof Center � ^ � 2.09 Developed CenterPlace - 13.80 Developed 8ubtotal ' 33.78 I Undeveloped Paric Land -- ---- - - - - My►tie PoIM Park �� 31.07 Uncieveloped Valley Mtsslon Park (South) -- ^�__ - T.22 Undeveloped 3ubtota! 38.28 ' Total Park Acres 163.46 � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 24 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Level of Servlce The Countywide Planning Policies for Spokane County requires all jurisdictions to adopt a level of service (LOS) standard for parics. Spokane Valley has the flexibility and freedom to adopt a °' LOS standard for parks that reflects the ,� �v�' expressed need and desire of our community. � '-�=� `; ._ . , : .. The National Recreation and Parks Association � ��y-�' suggest that cities adopt LOS standards for different park types, such as mini (pocket), ' neighborhood, community and major parks. Spokane Valley does not have a well-developed �' � ' ,� - � , :� � park system and will use total City-owned park � �, -,_� . acres for its LOS measurement. ��Y'' Spokane Valley currently owns 163 acres of �-„ _.�r,�:;�,�2 ��- `��= develo ed and undevelo ed arfc land. Usin the t` "�'- i �,. "�� . , > 2006 population of 85,010 people, the c urent ��_'`�� _`� parks LOS is 1.92 acres of City park land for every 1000 residents. Spokane Valley adopts 1.92 acres/1000 people as its minimum LOS standard for parlcs, as shown is Table Tabl� 4.14 3pokana Valley Partcs L�val of SKVIc� 4.14. Spokane Velley reoognizes that cfti-owrwd schools, churches, natural areas and 200� Poputatbn P � �� ot servtc� commercial enterprises all provide recreation opportunities for Spokane Valley residents. These will all be ss,o�o 183 �.92 acxes��000 taken into consideration when � Spokane Valley determines the best location to purchase new park land. Forecast of Future Needs Spokane Valley has the capacity to accommodate 20,666 people over the next 20 years within the current City limits. In order to maintain the current LOS of 1.92 acres11000 people, Spokane Valley would have to add about 40 acres of park land over the next 20 years, with 12 acres in the first six years, as shown in Table 4.15. The Parks Master Plan provides a more detailed analysis of park and recreation needs by dividing the City into smaller service areas. Tab{Q 4.1a Future Puk Oema�d Ysar Popu{adon Total Park Acros Acros Roqulrod at 1.92 Nat Ooflcl�ncy Acres Avallablo •cresh 000 2006 85,010 163 163 0 2012 92,243 163 -. 177 � -14 i 2025 105,676 183 203 -40 •Aasumes 20-year gro�h ot 20,668 people Locatlons and Capacftles of Future Facilitles In order to maintain the adopted 1.92 acres/1000 level of service standard, Spokane Valley must add 12 acres of park land by the year 2011. In order to address this deficiency, Spokane Valley will purchase 20 acres of park land within the six year time frame of this Capital Facilities Plan, resulting � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 25 of 58 City of Spokane Valiey Comprehensive Plan in surplus of eight acres as shown in Tab1e 4.16. The Master Plan will be used to determine the best locations for park land acquisitions. Tabia 4.15 Pirics Capsctty Matysb Ysar Poput�tian Total Puk Acns Acns Rsquir�d at 1.92 N � �� A � Availabl� scres�1000 2006 85,010 163 � 163 —( 0 2012 92,243 183' 177 6 e '20 acres of parkla�d witl be purchased wfthin flrst 6 y�ea�s of plan Capltal Projects and Financing Plan The following table details Spokane Valley's six year Parks and Recreation capital improvement financing plan. The table details projects that address level of service deficiencies (capacity projects) and other capital improvements (non-capacity) projects. Tabl� 4.17 Parlcs Capital Faclltties Plan No�a: Amounb In 51�000 Projoct 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total Park Land Acqulsitlon (20 � �� $1,000 Acres Capacity) � I � -�-- -� - � - ; - Paric Improvements 300 950 500 500 580 � 100 � 200 $3,130 - •-- - - -- -- � SMmmtng Pod Upgrades 1,600 � I I 51,600 � Total -- -- -- — 1.300 2,550 ' 500 -� 500 580 100 200 � �5,730 Revenue Sour+ca General Fund 1,300 300 �1,600 � � I I � — - � - -; - REET�1 ' `�`'� - �-- -- 400 � 400 � 100 � 200 $1,950 -- - - - - _ . I ! - --- — � G �� , 200 100 100 180 J 5580 � - �— -- - i 1,BQQ ' I $1,600 Spokane Courtty � i ' � i � —. , Total I 1,300 � 2,550 � 500 � 500 580 � 100 200 $5,730 � 4.4.11 Public Safety The Spokane Valley Police Department is a contract law enforcement agency, partnering with the Spokane County Sheriffs Department to provide a safe environment for the citizens, businesses, and visitors of the City of Spokane Valley. This unique contracting relationship allows for the sharing of many of our resources, allowing both agencies to operate at peak efficiency without duplicating services. Spokane Valley also contracts with Spokane County for judicial, jail and animal control services. The total contract for public safety for 2006 totaled over $16 million, including approximately 100 - � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter4 - Capital Facilities Page 26 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan commissioned police officers. Spokane Valley supports community oriented policing and recognizes it as an important complement to traditional law enforcement. In Spokane County, community policing is known as S.C.O.P.E., or Sheriff Community Oriented Policing Effort. The community policing model balances reactive responses to calls for service with proactive problem-solving centered on the causes of crime and disorder. Community policing requires police and citi�ens to join together as partners in the course of both identifying and effectively addressing these issues. About 364 Spokane Valley citizens are S.C.O.P.E volunteers. Community Survey The Community Preference Survey included questions to gauge the public's perception of police services. Results show that 85% of Spokane Valley residents believe police services are good, very good, or excellent, indicating a generally high level of confidence in the police force. Only 27% of respondents expressed a willingness to pay additional taxes to have improved police services. Inventory of Existing Facilities The Spokane Valley Police Precinct is located at 12710 E. Sprague and houses patrol and detective divisions, the traffic unit and administrative staff. The Precinct also includes a property storage facility and a Spokane County District Court. Spokane Valley is served by five S.C.O.P.E. stations, shown in the following table. Tabl� 4,.1 a 8pokan� Valky 3.C.O.P.E statlo�s Natghborhood Locatlon Noighborhood Locatbn V�dest Valley 3102 North Argonne Trenhvood 2400 N. Wllbur # 79 Universfty i 10621 East 15 Central Valley � 115 N. Evergreen Rd. Edgedfff 522 S. Thierman Rd. East ; 4903 N. Harvard #3 ' Level of Servlce Public safety is a priority for the City of Spokane Valley. It is difficult to determine at this time, an adequate and measurable level of police protection. Spokane Valley will monitor the perforrnance of the Spokane County Sheriff's Department and will adjust the contract for services as necessary to ensure an adequate level of police protection. Forecast of Future Needs Future needs for police protection will be determined as a part of the annual budget process. Locatlons and Capacities of Future Facilities Spokane Valley is not p{anning to construct any new (aw enforcement facilities at this time. Capital Projects and Financing Plan Spokane Valley is not planning to construct any new law enforcement facilities at this time. 4.4.12 School Facllitles Four public school districts provide service within Spokane Valley: East Valley, West Valley, Central Valley and Spokane School District 81. Spokane Valley must coordinate with each district to ensure consistency between the City's plan and school districts' plans. There are also a number of private schools that provide service to Spokane Valley area chi(dren. Inventory of Existing Facilities The School District Map, found at the end of this Chapter, shows district boundaries and locations of all public schools within Spokane Valley. Tables 4.19 through 4.21 shows capacities of all schools located within Spokane Valley. � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capita) Facilities - Page 27 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan School districts use portable classrooms at some school sites as interim measures to house students until permanent facilities can be built. Portable units are not included in capacity figures. School capacity figures are reported by the Washington State Superintendent of Public tnstruction and are based on square footage per student. TabN 4.19 C�Mrsl Valley 8chool lmrsrttory ElamaMary School Sq. FL Araa Capsclty Adams ' 46,879 521 ----- Summit (Formerty Blake) 34,823 � 436 g��y�y 40,648 499 Chester 38,388 480 Greenacres 55,875 ' 880 Keystone 33,669 421 �ny �ke 60,477 756 i McOonald � 46,504 ' S63 � Opport�mity 42,388 521 Ponde�osa 51,377 642 � - -- - - prog�� 37.573 ; 452 Soulfi Pines -- ----- I 45.956 499 Sunrfsse 53,673 - - ' 882 Unhrersfty 37,867 455 ' � Total E/emerrtary Permaneni Facllftles 626,097 ' 7,587 � Junlor HIQh Schools Sq. Ft Are� Capscity � Bowdlsh 74,738 I 743 Evergreen -- - -- 76,075 � 751 Greenacxes ' 91,803 -' - - -- - 908 Hortzon 84,795 —� 838 � North Pines - - -� - -- - 105,368 i --- - — 1.044 - Total Junia Higi� Permanenf Fac!lides i 432, 779 4, 284 3inior Hl�h Schoofs aq. �� ap�Y Central Valley 239.540 1,988 University f -- - I 239,540 1,988 Tota! Sentor Hl�h Fsc!lt�bs I 479, 080 3, 974 Source: Central Valley Sc�ool Olstrict TabN 4.20 East Valioy Scl�ool Imrentory Elfinentsry 8chool &q. FL Area Capacfty East Farms 47,047 579 OUs Ordiards i - 51,789 829 Skyview � 42,140 i 509 � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009,� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 28 of 58 City of Spokane Valiey Comprehensive Plan Tablv 4.20 E�ast Vall�y School Invarttory ElomaMary School Sq. Ft Aroa Capsclty Trent 58,482 713 TreMwood - -- � - - --- ------ 47,274 ` 573 I Total E/ementsry PermarKrrt Facilities 246, 732 I 3, 003 i Junior High Schools ' Sq. FL Ma ' Capecfty East Valley � �,�� 8 3 1 Mountain Vfew - --- -- - -- - -- - - -- 82,544 816 Total Junlor HJgh Permanent Facilities 167,10b 1, 647 Senlo� Higfi Schoob Sq. FL Ana Capsctty i East Valley I 203,248 1,886 Tota! Sentor Hlgh Facf!lties 203, 248 i 1, 688 Source: Washi�ton State Supe�ir�tendent of Public Instruction Tabi� �.Z1 Wast Vall�y School l�v�ntory Elementary 3chool 3q. F� Area Capacity Mfllwood Earty Childhood Ctr. 27,184 ' 340 - - - -- ---- � - Ness 33,440 � 418 Orchard Ceriter - �- -- ---� 34,094 42fi Pasedena Park �— - - ---- ----- 34,002 - � -- 425 � Seth Woodward 35,941 - j- 449 Tota! Elemer>tary Permanent FecNit/es ^ 164,641 2,058 �ddl� Sthoob Sq. FL Arp Capscity Centennfal 89,870 ' 875 West Valiey City School 30,258 307 TotaJ Junlor H1gh Permanenf FaciilGes 120, t 28 J,182 � Senlw High 8choob ' 3q. Ft Area CapsCky West Valley 149.128 ' 1, 207 - - Spokane Valtey - - - - ---� ---- --- -- 13,902 i 118 Tota! Senior High Facilifies i 63, 030 1, 323 3ource: West Valley School District Level of Servlce The Countywide Planning Policies for Spokane County requires that all jurisdictions adopt a Level of Service standard for schools. Spokane Valley defers this responsibility to the individual school districts providing service within the City. Individual school districts may request that Spokane Valley adopt a Level of Service standard in future updates to the Capital Facilities Element. � Adopted April 25, 200fi (Updated 01-07-20�� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 29 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Forecast of Future Needs Central Valley School District The Centra) Valley School District (CVSD) is experiencing a period of high growth in student population, particulariy towards its eastern boundary. Liberty Lake and Greenacres E(ementary Schools are currently over capacity. In response to this growth, the District initiated its'Community Linkages" planning process in the fall of 2004 to develop strategies and alternatives for accommodating its present and future students. The committee developed student population projections through the 2008/2009 school year for the entire district by anatyzing growth trends in student population, building permit activity and proposed housing developments. The data wilt be used to guide decisions on where to locate school facilities. Table 4.23 shows the number of students enrolled in Central Valley Schools in 2005 for each school in the District and projections through the 200&09 school year. In 2005, 11,480 students were enrolled in CVSD schools, with 9,363 of those students living within the City of Spokane Valley. Tsbl� 4.23 Clntral Vatl�y EnrollmaM ProJectlon Studant Naw Prototted Stud�rrt gWdent School Attendancs Ares Enrollrttartt 2005 Enrollment tn 2008-Z009 IncroasQ E/emontsry Schools Broadway - - - - I - - 492 � -- - - 517 25 Progress 291 311 - - -- - - -- 20 - Qpportunity 339 366 71 Adams 466 503 - -- - - 3T - Univefsity 419 435 - - 16 South Plnes f 331� ' 332 1 - McDonald - -� - - - -- -- 358 - - - - 3g4 - 8 -- Sunrfse - - - - 490 - - 532 - - 42 Ponderoaa ' 334 '� 337 3 Chester 322 � 352 � 30 Gree�acxea 588 686 98 l.lberty Leke - 727 ' - - - — - 878 149 Total 5155 � 5611 I 458 � - ---- Mlddle Schools I I. e�-- ` - Narth Plnea --- - j 525 � 551 28 Bowdlsh � b74 ' S89 15 Horizon ---- 440 I 482 22 - Evergreert - - - -- - - — 578 - -- 630 - � - Gt�eenat�s •- - - 644 I 757 - - � _ 113 Total 2761 I 2989 I 228 High Schools - - - - - - Unfveratty Hlgh _ _ 1922 -- - - - 2055 � - -- --- - - - -- -- 133 - ( Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated Q'�-Q7-2009� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 30 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Cerrtral Valley H)gh ' 1642 1804 162 Total 3564 3859 295 Total StudeM Enrolimern 11,480 12,459 � 979 Souroe: Central Velley Linkages Committee - John Bottelfi, Spokane County GIS The following table shows enroliment projections for Central Valley School District from the Washington State Superintendent of Public Instruction. The table provides historic and projected school enrolirnents for the years 2001 through 2010. Tab{e 4.24 Gntral Valley 3thool Enrolfinent Actual E�ro11meM ProJected Enroilment Orade 200! 2002 2003 2004 2006 20Q6 2007 2008 2009 2U10 K- 6 5,873 5,817 5,9fi5 6,2T2 8,433 6,686 6.980 7,332 7,697 7,985 7- 8 1,800 1,823 1.819 1.817 1.899 1,542 1,900 1,897 1,926 I 2,090 9-12 3,410 3,544 3,555 3,602 3,653 3,695 3,788 3,789 3,828 � 3,862 K-12 11,083 11.184 11,339 11,691 11, 985 12,323 12,688 13,018 13,451 13,937 Sourcs: Washington State Superintendent of Public instruction East Vallev School District East Valley School District has experienced a significant decline in enrollment in recent years. In 1999, enrollment peaked at just under 4,700 students down to 4,355 students enrolled in the fall of 2004. The following table indicates that East Valley will continue to lose students through the year 2010. - � Tabto 4.25 East Va!!ey 3chool Enrollmern - A�tua! E�rollmaM I Projoct�d Enroltment Grade 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 200T 2008 2009 2010 K- 6 2.355 2,288 2,to7 2,139 2,082 2,022 ' 1,974 1,964 � 1,931 � 1,917 7-8 743 735 732 716 690 � 681 659 , 589 572 � 564 9-12 1,592 1,565 1,544 1,500 1,396 1,354 1,322 1,337 1,292 1,217 K-12 4,690 4,588 4,443 4,355 4,168 I 4,057 3,955 3,900 3,795 3,698 ; Soume: Washington State Superintendent ai Public Instruction East Valley Schoo) District estimates that out of 4,240 total students enrolled in the District in September, 2005, 2,378 lived within the City of Spokane Valley. West Vallev School District West Valley Sch�l District has grown in student population consistently since 1998 and is projected to continuing growing through the year 2010, as shown in Table 4.25. Tabl� 4.28 Wast Valiey 3chool Enrollment Actual EnroNrtwr�t Projactad Enrotlment Grade 2001 2002 2003 2044 20U5 2006 ' 2007 2008 2009 2010 K- 6 1,591 1,552 1,614 1,581 1,605 1,610 1,632 1,710 1,728 1,T50 7-8 545 568 575 528 542 I 560 � 587 -- 503 519 569 - � � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009J Chapter 4- Capital Facilities ._ Page 31 of 58 City of Spokane Valiey Comprehensive Plan Tabio 4.26 Wost Val�ey School EnrollmeM Actual Enroliment Projacbd EnrotlmMt 9-12 1.469 1,502 1,503 1,534 1,510 1,538 1,554 1,559 � 1,576 1.493 K-12 3,605 3,620 3,692 3,643 3,657 3,708 3,753 3,772 i 3,8Z3 , 3,832 Source: Washington Staie Superintende�t of Public Instructlon Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities Central Vallev School District The most urgent need for the CVSD is to add more elementary classroom space in the east end of the District. The District recently acquired two properties in the north Greenacres area for a new elementary school. The District will need to construct a new high school and middle school in the 20•year time frame of this comprehensive plan. The district has a site for a middle school adjacent to the Liberty Lake Elementary School. A number of elementary schools need to be completely remodeled, including Opportunity, Greenacres and Ponderosa. East Vallev School District East Valley is not planning to construct any new facilities within the six year time frame of this capital facilities plan. Future updates to this plan will incorporate new capital projects. West Vallev School District West Valley is remodeling its High School and will add elementary school classroom space. Capital Projects and Financing Plan West Valley School District passed a$35 million bond measure in 2004 that is being used to remodel West Valley High School, construct new elementary school classrooms and a new gymnasium. Central Valley School District is in the process of developing a Capital Improvement and Financing Plan. 4.4.13 Sewer Service Background In 1983, Spokane County initiated an ambitious program to bring sewers to houses and businesses located in the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA). Since that time, over 17,000 residences and businesses in the greater Spokane Valley area have been connected to the County's sewer system. Spokane County has invested nearly $200 million in sewer construction countywide to date. Continued sewer construction in Spokane Valley will cost another $74 million through the year 2010 when the County's Septic Tank Elimination Program (STEP) is compleied. This figure does not include costs for a new wastewater treatment plant, which is discussed later in this section. Upon Incorporation, the City of Spokane Valley entered into an interlocal agreement giving Spokane County lead agency authority to provide sewer service. At this time, Spokane County and Spokane Valley elected officials are exploring the options for the possible assumption of the Valley sewer system. However, no decisions have been made regarding the transfer of responsibility and ownership of Valley sewers. This section of the Capital Facilities Plan assumes that Spokane County will continue to own and operate the sewers in Spokane Valley. The CFP will be updated as necessary to incorporate future changes. Comprehensive Wastewater Management Plan In 1996, the County adopted an Interim Comprehensive Wastewater Management Plan (CWMP). The intent of the CWMP was to develop strategies to expedite the sewer program for protection of � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facil�ies Page 32 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan the Aquifer, and to satisfy regulations established by the Washington State Departments of Heafth \ (DOH) and Ecology (DOE) and the Spokane County Heafth District. �- In 2001, Spokane County updated the CWMP, which focused on redefining priority sewer areas and conforming to requirements of the Growth Management Act (GMA). Most sign�cantty, the CWMP updated population and wastewater flow forecasts and produced a revised Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Wastewater Facilkies Plan Along with the CWMP, Spokane County adopted a Wastewater Facilities Plan (WFP) in 2001 that identified wastewater facilities and programs required to meet the long-term sewer needs of the County. The WFP focuses on developing a long-term wastewater management strategy for the County. The WFP provides an in-depth analysis of various wastewater treatment technologies available, in addition to e�cploring the wide range of related environmental considerations. Public participation was fully integrated into this e�ensive planning effort. Wastewater Treatment Wastewater is conveyed through Spokane County's sewer system to the City of Spokane Riverside Park Water Reclamation Facility (RPWRF) for treatment and discharge into the Spokane River. In 1982, Spokane County and the City of Spokane signed an interiocal agreement wherein the County purchased ten million gallons per day (mgd) of capacity in the RPWRF. Spokane County is currently using nearly eight mgd of its contracted capacity. A key component of the WFP is to develop a new Spokane County Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant (SCRWfP) to serve wastewater generated in the greater Spokane Valley region. The WFP explores the following treaiment altematives: • Discharge of treated wastewater effluent to the Spokane River, using one or more new treatment plants between Liberty Lake and the City of Spokane. • Discharge of treated wastewater effluent to the Little Spokane River, providing flow augmentation in the Little Spokane River to help meet minimum stream flow needs. • Use of treated and reclaimed wastewater for irrigation of agricultural lands, golf courses, school grounds and parks. • Use of treated and reclaimed wastewater for creation of wetlands. • Underground storage of treated and reclaimed wastewater for subsequent use for irrigation or release to streams for flow augmentation during critical low-flow periods. • Recharge of the Spokane Aquifer with treated wastewater effluent, with the co-mingled water being avai�able for all uses including potable water supplies. • Discharge of wastewater to the Liberty Lake treatment plant for treatment and subsequent discharge to the Spokane River. In June 2004, Spokane County amended its WFP to provide supplemental information related to water quality of the Spokane River, additional site-specific detail for the proposed treatment plant location and a report on the progress of key implementation activities. Site Selection During the development of the WFP, prior to Spokane Valley's incorporation, Spokane County engaged in an intensive public participation program to determine the most appropriate location for a new wastewater treatment plant. It was determined that the ideal location would be on the westem end of the Valley within close proximity to the Spokane River and large enough to allow for future plant expansions (15 to 20 acres in size). � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 33 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Spokane County solicited nominations from the public and reviewed its land use database to - identify potential parcels. Fifteen sites were initially identified and subjected to a thorough screening process. The sites were evaluated by a technical committee consisting of civil engineers, biologists, geo-engineers and land use planners. The selection process was monitored by a citizen focus group and included three public hearings to ensure continuous public participation. At the end of the process, two sites, Alki/Fancher (close to the Fairgrounds) and the old Stockyards site (on Maricet Street in the City of Spokane), were selected for fu�ther environmental review. A Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) was prepared to evaluate the potential environmental impacts on each site and conveyance routes for raw sewage and treated effluent. However, it was determined that the AlkilFancher site could not be secured in time for site development. Therefore, the Playfair Race Track site was selected for further environmental evaluation. After thorough review, and two more public hearings in early 2004, the Stockyards sit2 was chosen as the preferred site to locate a new treatment plant. It has not been determined if the new treatment plant will be constructed, owned and operated by Spokane County, the City of Spokane Valley, or by a special purpose govemmental body. Inventory of Existing Facilities Sewer facilities within Spokane Valley are a system of pipes and pumping stations that move untreated sewage to the City of Spokane Riverside Paric Water Reclamation Facility (RPWRF). The folfowing tables provide an inventory of sewer facilities in the Valley. Table �.27 Spokane Valley Pump 3tatlons 3tatbn P� Horsapow�r Stand-by Povwr P Capaclty (9Pm) � � Ella 3 89 � Yes No 2,600 Midilome � 2 - - 5 � - No Yes 185 � -- - - - Ml�abeau �i 2 I 10 Yes No 280 ' � � — ---- � — — Rldgemont 2 5 ; Yes Yes 150 Rlvervvalk I 2 15 Yes No 300 Sprague i 2 I 10 Na _ _— No -- -- 920 9pm = gallons per minute Source: Spokane County Utiliiies Department Taba � .ZB Spoka� Vallay Interc.optors Level of Service 3tand capectty The Regional Minimum Level of Service Standards state �"�� powar �pd� that incorporated areas will be provided with wastewater sauct, va�iey , No ; 3o,eoo,000 collection and transport systems in accordance with the , adopted sewer concurrency requirements of the - rvortn vaney � rvo �0,�50,00o jurisdiction. Spokane Valley requires all new gpd • gaiia,a � dey sou�ce: spoMcane development to be served with public sewer. Only county uts. �ept. existing residential, commercial and industrial lots may be served by septic systems/drain fields (approved by the Spokane County Heafth District) and only if public sewer is unavailable. Forecast of Future Needs Spokane County currently has about 26,223 customers within its sewer system area. Since some customers generate more flow than others, it is common to define an Equivalent Residential Unit _ (ERU) as a way to project future flows and to set the cost se�wer service rates. Spokane County _ � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated �,-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 34 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comp�ehensive Plan figures an ERU to be 900 cubic feet of water per month, or about 225 gallons per day. The 26,223 customers account for 38,831 ERUs. �- Table 4.28 Spokano Vap�y Saw�r Lines and Manhol�s (3ravtty Mains Total LanQth (iq 6' 1,282 8` 1,117,747 10" 125,782 12' 52,763 15° 39.620 18' 34,137 21' 14,603 24" 29,885 27' 12,585 30" 14,782 36" 18,807 42" 20,938 48' 11,0$8 54" 16.544 - Total Lon�th 1,510�763 R � 286 mi Manhale Covers 5,695 Source: Spokane County UUllties Departrnent The following table shows that Spokane Valley accounts for 28,396 ERUs, or 73% of the County's total ERUs. Tabl� 4.30 Spokane County 3awsr Custom�rs and ERUs Customor Typa City ot Spokane Valley Aroas Remaining County Totat fa� Counry val�ey ouesld• ot chy s4rvrce Areas sarvic• Aross Accounts ERUs Accounts ERUs Accounts , ERUs Accounts ERUs Single Fam(ly , 15,960 16.353 1,924 1,937 6,329 i 6,414 24,213 24,704 � Multl-Family -- 37T � 5,Od3 -- -- 88 137 127 S48 592 � 8,128 CommerGel � 1 1,217 i 6,827 8 30 I 186 969 .- 1 7,826 , Mobfie Home Parks 9 I 173 0� 0 0 0 - 9' 173 TOTAL 17,663 28,396 � Z,018 2�104 I 6,642 8�331 Z6�223 i 38,831 Souroe: Spokane County Utilitles Department The most urgent need for the Spokane region is to increase the capacity to treat wastewater. Spokane County adopted a new policy in 2005 making connection to the sewer system voluntary for new sewer construction areas as a part of the Septic Tank Elimination Program (STEP). The County estimates that 50% of the parcels within the STEP area will connect voluntarily in the year � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities _ Page 35 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan f�ollowing sewer construc#ion. Table 4.31 shows the County's historic and projected total - connections to the sewer system through the year 2010. T�bt� 4.51 Co�n�ctlons to County Swv�r S�ptic Tank New Total Yesr Eqminatbn Constructfon ConcNWor�s 2002 1,490 609 2,099 — 2003 ' 1,407 - - - � - 565 ' 1,972 2004 1.573 474 2.047 -- 2005 j 1,230 i -- 682 1,912 -- Z006 , - 596 - — — --- 585 , ,, 8, 2007 i --- 843 585 -- 1.228 2008 g� � 1,139 �2009 781 - - - 585 - - - --- 1,366 - - - 2010 ` 691 - — — — - ' - 585 i 1,276 i i A two percent annual growth rate is used to project the amount of sewer flow that new construction wili add to the system. Using these assumptions, the County expects to reach its contracted ten mgd capacity at the City of Spokane Reclamation Facility by the year 2014, as shown in the following table. TabM 4.�2 Spolcar� Courty Wasiewrstr� Tnartm�nt Piant Ca�acity Projaetlora Yeu , 2004 2005 200a 2007 2005 2008 2010 2011 2Ql2 2013 2014 Flow (mgd) 7.3 7.8 8.1 8.3 8.6 8.8 9.1 9.3 9.6 9.9 i0.1 i Source: SpOkene COUnty Utilitle8 Depertmertt Note: TT�sss �ro projeaed capacitles to� 3poksns CouMy. The City af Spokane Valley doea not have Ita own ellotted capeat�►. Spokene Valley does not gusrarttee that wast�water capaaty wltl be awHab{e fa new cansUuctlon in tt�e future. Locations and Capacities of Future Facllities Sewer Construction The purpose of the County's Septic Tank Elimination (STEP) program is to expedite the construction of sanitary sewers and dramatically reduce the number of on sewage treatment facilities over the Spokane-Rathdrum Aquifer, and to satisfy regulations established by the State Departments of Heath and Ecology, Spokane County Heaith District and other regulatory agencies. The Sewer Projects Map found at the end of this chapter shows the areas where sewer will be extended as a part of the STEP program over the next six years. Spokane County anticipates that the construction of all sewers within the STEP project areas will be completed by the end of year 2010. The Sewer Project Priority Map shows areas tfiat have had sewer lines installed within Spokane Valley and areas that are scheduled to have sewer lines installed by 2010. The industrial area in the far northeast corner of the City currently does not have public sewer service. To encourage economic development and job creation, Spokane Valley may consider extending public sewer to this area. Wastewater Treatment Plant The Spokane County Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant (SCRWTP) will be located at the old � Stockyards site inside the City of Spokane. The SCRWTP is scheduled to be operational by the - � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 36 of 58 Ci�r of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan year 2012. Construction will occur in two phases to meet projected capacity requirements through the year 2025. Phase 1 will provide a maximum capacity of eight mgd and should be completed `� by 2012. Phase 2 will provide an additional four mgd capacity. Depending on the rate of growth, Phase 2 may be completed as early as 2015. Capital Projects and Financing Plan Wastewater Treatment Spokane County has programmed capital expenditures for its share of upgrading the City of Spokane Riverside State Park Reclamation Facility (RPWRF) for the years 2006-2011, as shown in Table 4.33. The upgrades are required to meet State and Federal sewage treatment guidelines. Spokane County is also moving forward with plans to construct and operate a new Wastewater Treatment Plant at the old Stockyards site. Phase 1 construction costs are estimated at $132 million; Phase 2 is estimated at $42 million, bringing the total to $201 million for the new treatment plant. Capital costs for the years 2006-2011 are shown in Table 4.34. Tabla 4.33 Costs for Clty of 3pokane Wrrorsfd* Stata Parfc Reclamation Fscflity (RPWR� Upgndes Pro}�ct 2008 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total Water Qualiry Upgrade al RPWRF 56,100 S7,300 $1,000 S2.200 58,70Q $8,700 $34.000 Notea: 1. The 2006-2011 estlmates were provided by the City of Spokane. 2. Funds for the RPWRF Upgrades witl come from tfie Wastewater Treatment Plarri Fund and General Fadlit�es Fund 3. Assumes effluent fiitratlon completed by 2012 to compty with dissalved oxygen total maxlmum daity load (TMDL) 4. Estimates In Thousands of Dollars Source: Spokene County Six-Year S�wer Constructlon Capital ImprovemeM Program - 2006 through 2011 Tabl� 4.5� Cosb for Nfw WssbwvatK Tn�atrnw�t FscilkNes Projset 2Q06 2007 200a 2008 2010 2011 To�l Englneering, Management $�0 $500 5500 , S500 5250 �250 $2,500 and Legal Services � Land - Pump Stations and �5p0 $1,400 $500 30 � SO � �0 52,440 Treatment Ptant � � Conveyance � - - - - DesIgN8ld/Build $0 $875 52,000 59,000 S9,000 SO �20,875 ConsVuction Cost I Treatment Plant - i DeslgNBuild Constructlon ' �0 P4,000 59,25Q 518.750 � S20.000 i $20,000 572,000 Cost � Totals s1,000 S6,T7b 512,250 ' :28,250 ;28,260 ;20,260 :97,775 AnnwlO�bt SKVk� Payment from Reserves :1,008 SO ' SO SO S4 SO Cumulative Bond Sales SO S6,776 518,025 =42�276 � =76,525 596,776 Annual Debt Service SO i56T i1,b92 =3,956 :6�404 i8,098 � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities _ Page 37 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Pian Tabla 4.34 Cosb for Naw W�s�t� Tnatm�nt factittNs � ProJsct 2006 200T 200a 2009 2010 2011 Tota! Notea: 1. The abov8 es�mates are based upon the following assumptiorrs: - New 8 million gpd piant on tfie Stodcyards site, with flows starting fn 2012. - Effluent fiitratlon wlll meet the requlrements of the d�asolved oxygen TMDL. - Outfall to Rebecca SC from the Westewater Treatment Piant (VVV�ITP) slte. - Pump Stetlon 8 Force Main from Spoicene Valley Iriterceptor to V111NTP. • Pum� Station 8 Force Maln from No�th Valley Intetceptor to VVINTP. - DesigNBufidJOpefate caMrad for the WV�fP. - DesigNBid/Build pubilc wortcs corrtrad for tt�e conveyance pro�Cts. 2. 'Annuat Debt Service" is assumed to commenoe for a giv�en exper�iture in the year fotlowing the expenditure. The amount shown for 'Annuel Debt Service' includes the estimated debt service to� cumulative expendltures end assumes the annual sale of 20-year bonds at 5.596 Interest rates. A portlon of the ennual costs may be pald from ava(table reserves, retfie� than from bond proceeds. For those years where the 'Cumulative Bond Sales' is Ilsted at S0, it is assumed that tfie previous year's expenditures were paid from reserves. The p�imary souroes of funding are tfie Ceneral Factfities Fund and Wastewater Treatment Plant Fund. 3. EaUmate in thousands of dollars. Soun�: Spokane County Sbc-Year Sewer Construction Capital Improvemertt Program - 2006 through 2011 Sewer Construction The following table represents Spokane County's adopted sewer construction program for 2006 through 2011. The Sewer Projects Map, found at the end of this chapter, shows the bcation of the sewer projects for the greater Spokane Valley, both inside and outside the City boundary. Tsbl� I.3a Spokane County Sep�ic Tank Elkniratlon Pro9ram 81x-Year Flnancfng Plan Pro]eds 2008 200T 200s 2009 2010 2011 Tatal Valley Sewer Ccnstn.�ction' S17,063 512,312 S17,197 $24,639 $22,989 50 594,20Q No�th Spokane Sewer ConaUudlon SO i 51,357 54,240 50 52,265 SO � 57,882 , �i Miscellaneous ' $500 I 5500 I 3500 S500 �5U0 5500 i 53,000 Total -- --- - -� 517,583 ` S14,189 ' S21,937 525,139 S25,754 �500 I 5105,062 Fu�din9 Sourcas � � - �----- � State Grant - f $3,750 l S3,750 S3,750 53,750 53,750 SO i S18,750 Generat Facitities Fund 51,333 I $2,523 , 52,603 $666 53,019 SO � 510,144 -�-- -- ' Capital Fadtfdes Rate Prepayments �- 5872 ' $777 �1,134 � 51,038 51,145 -- SO 34,966 � _ - . Bonds -- 53,488 I S3.108 S4,b36 � 54,153 - 5�4,579 0 519,864 Subsfdy Fundfng from Reserves 58,1 � 54,011 59,914 �, 515,532 513,261 5500 � 551,338 Total - - - - $17,563 � �14.169 i 521,937 � $25,139 $25,754 S500 � $105,062 •Note: Thts table represents projeds bott� Inslde and outslde the Clty of Spokane Val{ey Amour�ts are tlmea $1,000 Source: ne Cou Slx-Year Sewer Cortstructlon Ca I Im rovement Pr ram - 2006 thro h 2011 Spokane Valley will continue the commitment to replace septic systems with public sewers and will examine the feasibility of extending public sewer to unserved commercial and industrial areas to encourage economic development and job creation. 4.4.14 Solid Waste In 1968, the intergovemmental agency known as the Spokane Regional Solid Waste System ! (System) was formed by interiocal agreement between the City of Spokane, Spokane County and � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 38 of 58 City of Spokane Vailey Comprehensive Plan all other cities and towns within the County. The System is responsible for implementing solid waste management plans, planning and developing specific waste management programs and � updating solid waste plans for the entire County. The System is managed by the City of Spokane, which uses its structure to carry out the various solid waste management programs for our region. In Spokane Valley, solid waste services ere provided by private haulers licensed by the Washington Utility and Transportation Commission (W.U.T.C.) through franchise agreements. Waste Management of Spokane provides residential and commercial garbage services and weekly curbside recycling collection; Sunshine Disposal provides only commercial services. At this time, Spokane Valley residents are allowed to self-haul their garbage to an appropriate dumping site. Inventory of Exlsting FacftiUes The Regional Solid Waste System includes a Waste to Energy facility located at 2900 South Geiger, and two recycling/transfer stations. One of the stations is located within Spokane Valley at 3941 N. Sullivan Road south of Trent and across from the Spokane Industrial Park; the other is located in north Spokane County at the intersection of Elk-Chattaroy Road and Highway 2. Landfills are necessary to provide disposal for solid waste that cannot be recycled or incinerated, or that exceeds the capacity of the WTE Facility. The Spokane County Regional Health District licenses six privatety owned landfills in Spokane County. Level of Service The minimum Regional Level of Service Standards requires solid waste services to meet all State and Federai regulations. Forecast of Future Needs Spokane Valley is participating on the update of the Spokane County Waste Management Plan (SCWMP). The SCWMP update process will determine future needs for solid waste disposal. LocaUons and Capacities of Future Facilities The updated Spokane County Sotid Waste Management Plan will provide information on future ` regional solid waste facilities. Finance Plan The updated Spokane County Solid Waste Management plan will include a financing plan for future regional solid waste facilities. 4.4.15 Stormwater Facilities Stormwater runoff in Spokane Valley flows to a combination of public and private facilities. In developed areas, runoff flows down street gutters and is disposed through drywells in public road rights-of-way, drywells on private property and grassy swales with overflow drywells in easements on private property. There are advantages and disadvantages to relying on on-site facilities for all stormwater management. One advantage is that on-site facilities are typically constructed with private funds and can be integrated into the development as a green space amenity. However, on-site facilities are sometimes not well maintained. Their capacity may be diminished over time or they may fail entirely during large runoff events. On-site facilities may take up large portions of a development site, thereby reducing the effective density that can be accommodated in that area. In 2004, the Spokane Valley City Council created a stormwater utility to develop and maintain storm drainage systems on public fand. To create revenues for the stormwater utility operations, the Council adopted an annual fee per Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU). Residential ERUs are based on the number of single-family dwellings, while Commercial ERUs are based on the square footage of impervious surface associated with a business or commercial development. � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities � Page 39 of 58 Cfty of Spokar�e Valley Comprehenstve Plan ' Inventory of Existing Facllities Spokane Valley's inventory of stormwater facilities, most of which are integral to the safe function of our street system, �nsists of about 5,600 drywells, 928 swales six detention ponds, and one re#ention pond. Other facilities include curb inlets, bridge drains, and culverts, all of wfiich require monitoring and maintenance. The retention pond, located at Dishman-Mica Road. and 32 Ave., was constructed as a part of a road project and provides a disposal point for water flowing from Chester Creek. Level of Service The Spokane County Board of Commissioners adopted new regional level of service standards for stormwater in 2004 as a part of the Countywide Planning Policies update. The standards reflect current best practices that are established in adopted stormwater design guidelines. Spokane Valley follows said guidelines in reviewing and approving new development and is therefore in compliance with the regional LOS standards for stormwater runoff. Forecast of Future Needs Spokane Valley will continue to use private, on-site treatment facilities for new development and will install drywells, swales and other facilities as needed for new street improvement projects. Locatlons and Capacities of Future Facilities Location and capacities of future facilities is dependent on the location and size of new development, future public street projects, and projects that will address current problem areas within the City. Future updates to this Capital Facilities Plan will incorporate capital programming for stoRnwater facilities. Capital Projects and Financing Plan The City currently charges a$20 annual stormwater utility fee per Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) to gerrerate revenues for stormwater facility engineering, maintenance and administration. The siormwater fee is expected to generate $1.2 million annually. Transportatton Facilfdes Inventory of Existing Factlitles This section of the Capital Facilities Plan includes transportation facilities within Spokane Valley, including streets, bridges, pathways and sidewalks. Street maintenance is not included as a part of the Capital Facilities Plan. Spokane Valley is responsible for about 455 miles of public roads, including 51 miles of Urban Principal Arterials, 61 miles of Urban Minor Arterials, 44 miles of Urban Collectors, and 298.85 miles of Local Access Streets. Table 4.36 provides a list of all arterial intersections within Spokane Valley. Level of Service Spokane Valley uses arterial intersection delay as its transportation level of service (LOS). This LOS is based on travel delay and is expressed as letters 'A" through "F', with "A' being the highest or best travel condition and "F' being the lowest or worst condition. The lowest acceptable LOS for signalized arterial intersections is set at "D°; the lowest acceptable LOS for un-signal¢ed arterial intersections is set at 'E'. This LOS standard conforms to the latest edition of the Highway Capacity Manual, Specia/ Report 209, published by the Transportation Research Board. Table 4.36 provides a six and twenty year level of service analysis for all arterial intersections in Spokane Valley. The analysis uses the regional transpo�tation model prepared and maintained by the Spokane Regional Transportation Council as its basis for forecasting future intersection volumes. Levels of service calculations follow Highway Capacity Manual methodologies. The last column in the table cross-references to capital projacts listed in Table 4.38. These projects will - address capacit�r deficiencies at the corresponding in#ersection. � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated �1-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 40 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Tabio 4.36 trttsn�cdon L.�vN ot SQnico Anafysb 2007- 200s 2011 2011 2025 2026 Z012 I�rsectbn Ccunt Control L03 L03 M �� 9 � LOS Mi �� e � ProJec! LOS' LOS' s 1 4th / Sullivan 2005 Sipnel C B D 2 4th / Thierman 20os 4-way stop A B C 3 4th / Univer5ity 2005 SiQnal C C C 4 8tt1/ BOwdlSh 2000 2-way stop � E E F F 33 5 8th / Cemahan 20a5 �-way accp B C C F F 18,4a 8 8ttt / Dishman-Mica 2004 S�qnal B B C � 8th / Evergreen 2d03 Signai A A A a 8th / McDonald 2ao5 2-way smp D E F s 8th / Park 2005 2-way sioP C C C D C 18 10 8th ! Plnes (SR-2� 2001 2-way stop F F F t t 8th / Sulllvan 2ao2 Siqnal 8 8 C 12 8tti / Thierman 2000 2-way stnp C E F 18 t� 8th / Univ9r8tty 2005 &lpnel 9 B B 14 16th / Adems 2001 4-way stop A B 0 15 16th ! Bowdish 2006 4-way stop C C C F 0 s3 te 16th ! Dishman-Mica 2004 Sipnel e B e 17 16th / Evefgf�en 2003 Siqnal e /1 I► 3d te 16th / Mc�onald 2005 4 stop B e C 19 16th / SR 27 2005 Sipnal D D D 2Z, 4Z 20 16th / SulNvan 2004 Sipnat 8 8 C 2� 16th / Universit�+ 2000 Spna1 8 B e � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200,9� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities _ Page 41 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan , Tabio 4.36 Int�nactfon L.�wi ot S�rvfca Anafysb 200T- In��sactlon Count Co�trol �a 2011 M � s � 2026 MI �� 2Q12 LOS L09 ��. L�3 �� Pro)act s 22 24th / EvBfgreen 2000 4-wap stop A B 8 F F 36 23 24th / Sullhran 2004 Sbnal 8 8 F 24 32t1d / Adam3 200t 2-way sEop B C C 25 32t1d 1 Be�kef 2003 2-way sbop COUNTY COUNTY 28 32nd / Bowdtsh 2005 Sipnal 8 B B 8 B �.7 2� 32nd / Dishman 2002 2 stop e e e 2a 32nd / Evergreen 2002 2-way aop B B B C E Z�, 36 i 29 32nd / Plnes 2005 Sipnal C C C 30 32nd ! SR 27 2005 S�nal C C D , 3� 32nd I Sultivan 2oa 2-wsy stop COUNTY CouNnr s2 32nd / University 2005 3bnal � 9 8 33 App�eway ! Barlcer 2o0s Slpnal C C C F F 1, 20� 2a � M �eway/Dishman �s Stpnal C c C 35 AppBeway / Farr 2oob Sipnal o C C 38 App{�rnr8y / Parlc 2005 Sl�nal C c C 37 Appleway / Thierman 2006 S(gnal 0 E F 38 Applew8y / UttiveBity 2005 Slflnal C B 8 6 39 App18W8y / ViSte 2005 Spnal 8 A N 40 Bf08dw8y / AdBrTts ?005 2-way stop C E F 8 41 Broadway / Argonne 2004 3ipnal A A B 3 42 &OSdwey / BOVYdiSh 2005 Sipnel A A B 8 � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated Q1-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Faciiities Page 42 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan TabIQ 4.38 IrttKS�ctlon L�vN of Santco Anaiysfs � 2007- Irttersactbn CouM Control 200b 2011 Mltlyatiad 202b Mtt g�sted 2012 L03 LOS ��. LOS LOS PrO � 43 Broedway / Evergreen 2005 Sfgne! C D E B 44 Br08dvV3y / Fer1Ch8� 2002 Sipnal D 0 F 45 8f08dwey / FIOfB Z005 2-way stop C F F F F � g � 46 Broadway / McDonald 2aos spnai s e a s a7 Broadway / Mullan ZOO4 Sqna! e e C e 48 Broadway / Park 2003 Sipna� D D C F C �� 2a 49 Broadway / Pines 2005 Sipnal D F 0 F 6, 22 (SR 50 Braadway / Sulliven 2005 Signal p 0 F 8 51 &vadway / Thierman 2005 S�nat e C F 52 Broadway / University 2002 Sipnal A A A 8 53 Broedwey / VF9te 2002 Sipnal A A A 8 sa Broadwey / Wal-Mart 2005 Sbna� 8 8 C 5 � Central Pre-Mix l 2aos Sbnm e e B Sullivan � Dishman-Mica / Z�5 Sbnsi B C o Bowdish � D{shman-Mica / 2op Sbnai C C C Unlversity-Schafer 69 EuGid (narth) / Barker 2002 2-way stop 8 B B C C 28, 3T 59 Euclld (south) I Barlcer 2002 2-way sbop 8 B B C C �2 so EudW / Flore (north) 2003 2 stap B o F 2s 61 EUd'Id / FIOre (SOt1tt1) 2003 2-way stop C D F Z8 ez EUa�d i Pa� �003 2-way stop � e e s3 Euclid / Sulllvan 200� S+�nai C C C D C so � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200,9, Chapter 4- Capitai Facilities Page 43 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Tabb 4.36 lMws�ctlon LsvM o! S��vla Matysh Z00T- 2003 2011 � 2025 � 2012 Inlarsoctfon Count Contra� Mkl��bd Mitlgat�ed L08 LOS LOS' LOS LOS' ProJtct t �t Indiana / Evergreen Zoo� S�pnal e C C ss IndtaRa / Mall-East 2005 sipnal B e C 88 (ndien8 / Mall 2005 Sipnal B B B 87 I�farta / Mirabeau �4 Sqnat B B e 88 Indiana / Pines (SR- � S�� D C D 2Z 2� 68 II'ldiana / SUIIIVBn 2005 Sipnal C C E 7o Kieman-B ! Sullivan 2003 Sqnal 8 8 C 30 71 K110X / A�Ot1r1@ 2004 Sbrtal 0 D D 19 � Mansfield / Pines 2 � Z F F C C s, � (SR-2� sloplsiqna! 73 Marietta / Sulfivan 2003 Sipn�l H C F 74 Mirabeau Pky 1 Plnes z � 5 Z F F 8 8 s, z2 (SR-2� stoplsipnal 75 Mlssidl Adaf118 1899 2�+way abop 8 B C 76 Mlsslon / Argonne 2005 Sfpna! � D 0 77 Mlssion / Ba�Cer 20os � pn E F � B 78 Missloti / BowdlBh 1999 2-way stop C E F 79 Misslo� / Evergreen 2002 Sbnef A A A a0 Mission / MC�onald 2002 Slgnai A A A et Misslon / Mulian 2oos S�qnai e e C 82 Mission / Par1c 2002 Sipnal B B 8 B B 10 83 Mission ! Pii18s 2002 Sipnal D E D F � 84 Mission ! Suliivan 2005 Sipnal C C F � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capitai Facilities Page 44 of 58 City of Spakane Valley Comprehensive Plan Tabl� 4.3i tntarsecUon L�wl ot Sarvicv Mafysis Z007- 2005 2011 �011 2025 2025 2012 Intfrsaetbn Count Control MFtlgatad Mitigated L03 L09 10 � L03 � P�joct � 65 MisSlon / U�iveBity 2004 2-wey atop C E F 8a �0 ��ry � 2004 Signal D D F 21 e7 Morttgomery / 2005 B B C Shopping Center 88 Montgomery ! 2p02 2 stop D D F University 89 Rutter I Park 2003 2-way at�p B B 0 90 S81t858 / Sullivan 2004 2-way stop D F F 38 61 Sprague 1 Adams 2oa Siprw� e e c Sprague 1 Appleway 92 Av� 2002 Sbnal B C F 31 COrbin s3 Sprague / Argonne 2oos S►pnai B e e 94 Spregue / Barlcef 2005 4-way stop 8 C B F F 24 - 85 Sprague / Bowdlsh 2005 Si�nat C D C D C 6 96 Sprague / Costca 2005 S�nai B 8 B (east of Camahan) s� Sprague I Evergreen 2oos 5i�nai c � c � c s 98 SpraguelFanct�er 2002 Siqnai o 0 0 98 Sprague / FaR 2005 Signal A A A 100 Spfdgue / FIOrd 1999 Spnal B C B F D 2d 101 Spr8glle ! GiiliS- 2005 Sbnal C C C 6 to2 Sprague / McDonald 2005 Sipnat D D C F C 6 103 Sprague / Muqan 2005 Sipnal C B B 104 Sprague / Park 2005 Si�nal C B B 11, ZB ( Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200,9� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities _. Page 45 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan T�bi� 4.3a tnt�r�adlon L�twl ot 8�vk� Analysis 200T- Int�rs�cUo� Count Control 2005 2011 M ��a� 2025 MI gatad 2012 LOS L03 ��, LOS LOS' PrO � 105 2�ague / Pines (SR 2005 Si�nal � E C F D 6, ZZ tod Sprague / Progress 2oos Sqns� C e e e a st 107 SprBgue / Sullivan 2o0b Sipnal D E C F D 31 108 Spregue / Tt�leRnan 20os Sipr�a! 6 9 C 109 Sprague / UNveStty 2005 Slpnal D C D 6 110 SpfegUe / ViSte 2005 Sipnal C A A � � � TreM (SR -290) / � S�� D E F , AtgQtlfl@ , Trent (SR-290) / 112 �� 2004 2-way stop F F F B.0 BTV � 113 E��p290) / 2003 Sipnai B B C . �t4 Trer�t (SR•280) / 200o Sipnat C C C _ Fancher : 115 TreM (SR-290) / Flora 2003 2-way stiop F F E B7v t 18 Trent (SR-290) / Patk 2003 S(�nat 9 B B C B 8, BN , 117 P�� SR -290� � 2003 Sipnal E F 0 F F 22, BN � �9 (�SgR-290)I 2002 2�ways�oP c o e Trent (SR-290) I ��`� 119 Unlvetsity 2005 2-way stop F F Re � 8N �� TfEtRt (SR-290) / 2p05 S; g r al l�1 B F D 30 Suilivan (Narth Ramp) 12 � Trent (SR / �03 grenal 8 8 F D 30 Su�livan(South Ramp) 122 TreM (SR-290) / VfBte 2003 Sl�na� B B 8 87Y 123 Wellesieyr / Evergreen 2005 4-way stop B B C 124 Wb11e8{ey / PfOQf658 2002 4-vray atop C B B 125 Wel1881Ay 1 SUIIIV811 2002 4�Mray stcp C F F F F 4� 30 � Adopted Ap�il 25, 2006 (Updated 01-Q7-2009,� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 46 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan TabIQ 4.3d IM�rsoctio� Uwl ot 8�rvk:a Malysis 200T- 2005 2011 � 2026 2025 2 � Z Intars�ctlon Count Control Mkigabd Mitlgated LOS LOS ��. LOS lOS• ProJad f Note: See Table 4.38 for a(isyng of capital improvsmant proJects. Regional Level of Service The Countywide Planning Policies require that LOS standards be adopted in accordance with the regional minimum level of service standards set by the Growth Management Steering Committee of Elected Officials. The Steering Committee approved the use of corridor travel time for use in establishing the regional Vansportation system. The Spokane Regional Trensportation Council is determining annual average corridor travel time through a trave! time study. This study is still in progress and corridor travel time Level of Service standards will be adopted upon its completion. Uses of Level of Servlce Standards As measures of transportation effectiveness, LOS standards can help jurisdictions identify where and when transportation improvements are needed, and when development or growth will affiect system operation. Level of senrice provides a standard below which a transportation facility or system is not considered adequate. Level of service standards can be used to evaluate the impact of proposed developments on the _ surrounding road system. They can also be used to identify problems, suggest remedial actions and apportion costs between public and private sources. LOS standards are a comerstone in the _ development of equitable traffic impact fee systems, which makes development pay some of the costs for improvements to the transportation infrastructure. The Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) performed traffic modeling for the urban area, considering future population growth and distribution. This model examines the performance of the entire urban transportation system. Improvements to provide for the increased traffic volumes shown by the model at the adopted level of service standards, are included in this plan. More information on the transportation modeling based on future land use assumptions is contained in Chapter 3, Transportation. Relatlonship to Concurrency Management Concurrency involves matching public facilities and new development_ The concept of concurrency predates the Growth Management Act for some public facilities, specifically through SEPA mitigation requirements. The GMA extends concurrency to transportation facilities by requiring that new development be served by adequate roads and public transportation service, and that development is not permitted to cause these transportation facilities to operate below level of service standards that are adopted by local governments in their comprehensive plans. "Adequate capacity refers to the maintenance of concurrency° (WAC 365-195-835). State Transportatlon Facilitles The Growth Management Act requires local jurisdictions to include inventory and Level of Service information for state transportation facilities in their Comprehensive Plans. State facilities are divided into finro categories: Highways of Statewide Significance (HSS), and Regionally Significant Highways (non-HSS). The Growth Management Act requires non-HSS facilities to be subject to concurrency. The following table lists State highways serving Spokane County. � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities __ Page 47 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan State Transportadon Level of Service The Washington State Department of Transportation Tabw 4.3� st�. Hi�t�way� (WSDO� requires state transportation facilities in H`g �� urban areas (inside the UGA) to maintain a minimum Level of Service standard °D." In rural areas 1_90 Interstale Hss (outside the UGA), the minimum LOS standard �s sR-2� �ne� Road �Non-�iss 'C." Those areas fying outside the UGA that may _ _ have urban characteristics can be evaluated by the sR-2so TreniAvenue ;Non-HSs WSDOT in conjunction with the City on a case-by- . Hss = Highway of Statewlde SigniflcanCe case basis to determine which standard is the most Non-HSS = Regionally Slgniflcant Highway appropriate frt. Intergovernmental Coordination Transportation plans were distributed for comment to all jurisdictions that may be irnpacted by, or impact, Spokane Valley's transportation system, including adJacent towns and cities, Spokane County, Spokane Transit Authority, Washington State DOT, and Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC). SRTC has overall responsibility for intergovemmental coordination of transportation plans. Each jurisdiction in the region must submit transportation plans to SRTC for inclusion in the Metropolitan Transportation Plan. SRTC responsibilities include: 1) Certifying the transportation elements of comprehensive plans adopted by the County, cities and towns in the region for consistency with the Metropolitan Transportation Plan; 2) Maintaining consistency between infrastructure plans and land use development plans, and 3) Reviewing LOS thresholds for transportation facilities in the Spokane Region. SRTC is also responsible for monitoring and evaluating the performance of regional transportation facilities as affected by land use and transportation improvement decisions. Concunency management is linked to the planning process. Any amendments to the comprehensive plans require a concurrency management system analysis and must meet thresholds before their adoption. SRTC will annually assess the regional transportation system with respect to regional concurrency. Capital Facilftles Pro)ects and Financing Capital Projects Table 4.38 contains a comp(ete list of transportation related capital projects for the years 2008 through 2013, totaling over $95 million. The City updates the six year TIP throughout the year as project priorities and funding changes. This Plan adopts by reference any updates to the TIP occurring between Plan update cycles. The current TIP is available for viewing online at www.spokanevalley.org. These projects address capacity issues at intersections and safety improvements. Following is a discussion of potential funding sources. Funding Sources Funding for the operation and expansion of the City's transportation system falls into several categories, which include federal, state and city funds. Some sources consist of reliable annual funds while others are periodic, such as grants. The use, availability and applicability of these various sources are not always at the discretion of the City. Spokane Valley will develop a track record with funding agencies as time goes on, which will help make to make more reliable funding assumptions. A summary of expected federal, state and local funding sources for the City's six year Capital Improvement Program is shown in Table 4.39. The following is a summary of transportation funding options. Federal Assistance These funds are authorized under the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equit�r Act for the 21� Century (SAFETEA-21) and are administered by the Federal Highway Administration through Washington State Department of Transportation and the Metropolitan � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 46 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Planning Organization (Spokane Regional Transportation Council). Federal funding programs include Bridge Replacement (BR), Congestion Management and Air Quality (CMAQ) and the Surface Transportation Program (STP). State Assistance The Washington State Transportation Improvement Board administers State transportation programs, including the Urban Corridor Program (UCP), the Urban Arterial Program (UAP), and the Sidewalk Program (SP). City Funds Spokane Valley contributes revenues from the General Fund and the Real Estate Excise Tax funds for transportation projects. The Ci�r also receives State Motor Fuel Tax and Restricted State Fuel Tax. . �ft�#�a��#t �9A8-�9�'�,a I �885 � A�}� Ffe� �a P� ��r-�',�eu� �at�i-A�rr� * S�e�o � A�►et�� a � -__ .-:�: _ _. _ _. _ _ _ :,x--�: _:: �:�:;.�=. r-� �:-3 >�-: �:: .. �-�;a s ��k � � � � s�8-a� . . �-��:�s G+�y � , .� $ �� ;► �c�ea �R �a 2�. 8 8fe��nra�r-t�r�---P�s �t„zas F�-k ldAi� � �3 F��:ac �G 8fea�waY-Far�: �.�p{� �a � � �aS��y�Al�G�e 9t��; � � �� S _ �1�' T"*4TC^? 't.""T'f1 't L tlV � �� &�s L�,;�r�r�:u;# S�F;�; 4 ,-0 � �� . _ _ __..�, .�� P �� I r4�*�-��t3ta� �3 �b6� Table 4.38 Six-Year Transaortation Caaital Facilities and Financina Ptan 2009-2014 dollars in thousands 2009 ej� ProlQCt � m To �fma Cttv Amount Total Annual # ource (�] Amount Q Broadwav Avenue SafeN Plnes Rd !SR-271 Park Road � � $� Proied � Adopted April 25, 200fi (Updated 01-47-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities _ Page 49 of 58 City of Spokane Vailey Comprehensive Plan 1 Plr►e�Mlansfield IPE 24� 1.798 g �artcef Road Brfd� �S � 4.159 ,� A�oiewav/Soraaue/Dishman- �rn��tate 90 Dishman-Mic� �$Q �Q � Mica ITS 4 STEP Paveback �f 1.7.�]. 1•50Q ¢ Street Pteserva�a�t Pro�i- �y 1.224 1.283 Various Streets g &oadwav Av�ue 1 �� ast of Flora R � 1� �Q � AQOEevvav Blvd �c �� SP �.i �3Z 4 yySDOT Ur�an Rarrro Proied- � � � �roadwav.At�anne. Freya U� � Pines/S�a�ue Irttersec�l4n � � � PS� 14 44th Ave Pathwav – Sands to � W�� STPIEI � �,$ �B� � 8roadwav Avenue Rehat� � Fenchef Road Thlerma� Road TS PNl Q� � � Park Road �It2 lPE oNv) Bro Avenue i n STPNI _4Q � �¢ Sar�gue Avenue Resurfadn_c� nive�si Evercmreen �i y �$5,$ 2,856 � EverareeNS�r�ue � � 1.133 Int�ecdon PCC � McDonaki/Snraque � � 1 Jrnersecti� PCC Annual Total �j,� 18.439 I – - — �L�a '�} Rs'y� � �8 �i+Fri� � 'rQ7a�-�i� � S'4ii3F63 �tii'fa13s^c� '�� r'�i� 3 �ac;;� �.�-��e � r� =;�•?-=�=;�a� T:--�:_s �R ��^., 3�� a S�R�ati+e�sk G+�► 8�A � .: � �� -�y �a2 :�� a a�tewa�t.8h�� L�+ve�-.y �er�:saa s�R �s�a � � ��+� s�a �� :�� ►-� � � e� es �a � • 6a� ��a�^,a s�A 2� � � da� L:s��a# �T�P{�} � 349 �-6 B�at�v�k�-Ava� �aa�r �a.� S�R�1d� � �8 �-6 Z-88 R�c �P£:d� �8 �4+ � �ay ��iaaa S�R{�y �8 3� . -- Tp t"!rf`t-�rr,^Q�,.� -.�f -M�� Crr" C7 � � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 50 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan I �� tef� Fte}e�i F�v, �'-�? Fi�r G4#� �':st�laQ:�4?��sl M � mttVasac'� �rf?i V �.:rS I �� i ._- `,;.,?:i�� -�! S :.,;:7 2010 t r Prolect From To Primanr Citv Amount Totai Ann�al � Source �] A ou 4 STEP Paveback � �,2Q4 1.399 ¢ Street Pr�servation Proiect C� 1,224 1.293 18Q ft. east vf � Broadway Ave Moore Elora Road � � �.�oa Z AQplewav Extettsion ni E�green ahet 2� 2.859 � SullivaNSotaaue Intersecxlon STP(U� �],� � PS& L Mansfleld Exte�sion Plnes (SR-27l Mirabeau Prkwv � � 1.038 � Flora Road S°raaue issio I.�AP $,Q 4� Park Road (Bridcino the Other 1 � Vallev) Federal �1 I�4 �4 �gue Resurfadnc,��2 Evergreen suriiva� �1�t ?� ?� � Sulllvan Rd lPE Ontv) �udid IWe lesiev TP QQ � � Indiana/Sullivan Intersection � �7,� 1.342 �� Broadwav/Sulllvan Intersecxlon � � 1.230 PCC � �gonne Road Interstate 90 Tren CMA 77 ,�7fi � �ullivan Road W�est Bridae � Q � �$ Braa Avenue ic�r arker UCP ¢� � � Applewav-Theirman E8 Lane CMAQ � �¢ Annual Total t 7.026 18.027 I �A� 1#��R Ffaj� Ff-�t► '3 F�a�,f�� 4'f-0►1i'�8�t�i =�i��-�:,t��a r �JiFi:� �} �'�ei}��:,•c;! Cf � - r9 ��-� r%�i-� b-r:�' tfcJi� i--r,i � ` ' r�'. _ ' � ' 6.+� ',�8� -'�2� 8 A�leway �� w.�rae� � � 4,�8� � �� 4'��d � &849 � �� S�A� � � � Adopted Aprii 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 51 of 58 City of Spokane Vailey Comprehensive Plan I �$-#-0 'ri� Fls��-3si F�3�i •�� F�t� EiiE�i-�'+ti'.t�.►��it �"��,A��a� ;; Sa.��:� #S�3 A.rt�arF =,-3 �_-;��,�-=� � - t,.a.,�.;=_.�� '_�--�� 3 ----• �8 � � ' ' _rt��-:•.�, �� .�� 8� F� � �R� J--99 -T.-�$r,� �AAA�Q i-T- -§� � S ` ^ :�i-�Qe�6�ief► �al�-6�k,� &� � �b �� e-«� L�va�e6le� S�P{Idj 48 2�88 � 8Fi 4 ?3a �4 �� &�A �-8 �S �3 R � � �a3 a-2�.'� I A��ua;-?�-<=1 t-a8:-� ��,2�� Pro From ,T� Primarv Citv Amount Totnl Annu�l # Source � Amoun � S7EP Paveback C�l 1� 1,399 Q Street PreservaUon Pralect S�C 1.�.4 1.293 j Aop{evvatt 8hrd Unl � S� 44Q �.7�4 � Manstfeld ExGens}on Pines Rd (SR-27� Mirebeau Pk�w I�P_ �$0_ �.44a �,¢ Flora Road �u_� Mifssl� � ?�$$ 1.487 F'ark Road_— Bridgl� the Other F�eral �Q 2.150 1 $ Valrev gg &gonne Road Interstete 90 Tret�t S�A� 141 � � Sullfvan Rd West B�id�e �S 4 ?� ,'�$ Bro�dv�r�v Avertu� F�4r� �es �P �4 2�4 �,Q Aoolewav-Thlennan EB lane � � L ,�Q Mission AvBtlue F1Q� � � � � � plahman-Mlca Rehab � � STP(P1 202 1.500 �h Sc1S�C.1�.�1� ,gj SalteselS�Ipvan Stan� � 144 414 � Pines Carr�da IT� Soraque .,?�g� S�AQ 280 2•OS1 3¢ Barker Road A� @�4��Y S�Ae 1� � Annuel Total t 4.�8 tZ2.63$ I �, -r � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 52 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan � Rfc�j�-:.� �ar•� ?'� �r�r�a� �� a�-A�R� � Sw;r•aa FS) �t O �-i� �•i�/ L!{'r✓ �-+=r� � ; _ �` 6�P} �A2 �8,2 8 -A�3;eway�iv� -��w=�; �+ -�"wec:�f� �GR 3g8 -&48� � �� '$�'� G��e�-Federa4 2� -��899 �$ F��-R�oa� S�a�a -�M5&�} t�nt� ?�3 �3� �0 -A��a�e--Rt-aa� �-98 �c�= � C-�� -� ;��2 � -��-R��E-�►t� �.� �'al�est� S�?� -48 -�S �3 ' ' 8R -9 --f3b �6 S�f3gt#e -�+i G�A,AQ �89 28&� I ,2-� ' G?" ' � G4 -4�4 I A��ua��al �-Z6��4 S�a886 2012 I� ro From Io rima C�it t Total Annuai � ou Amount�S� Amount ,� Street PreservaUon Proiects � 2.261 �,�,Q� 1¢ Flora Road Sofague Mission I�g,P � 1.337 Park Road — BridginQ th� Qt� 1 � Vailev �ed�r�l ?� 6.�49 27 Suftivan Road West Bridqe ¢g Q 4•Q56 ?� �Y F14� �e� S�P � 2�$Zfi �2 �!� fl� � S�A� � J.7o� �¢ �arker Road A Broadwav � 2$� 1 44 � Park Road -�2 fCN onlv) @�Q�y Indfana STP(Ul �Q 2.000 �I � �t �1 7.� 1� � Eve a� SR 27 �LShc � � �,Q Barker Road � lewa ,� �4 �7]. Annusl Total S 4.482 � 23.616 I �� =t� F��t �r0� � r��e�.:�r� r+'� ;;3��-`-�r�t1ua � &>�If,,'� /�,'{i6t![1�{`v� A{4ii}�?t}i � --�i;-:-:;i �i1i�l -�-�� -;-Ct�� a8 � -��aa-��7 � -:�:,a:-a ST+�i�) -,�t-0 -a�A4 � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated Q1-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 53 of 56 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan I �-a � R�� Frt�a �a #�#a�;:� 61:� T::��4, '�' Ss�3 r�iiAiiflt£�r + . : ; . , _: :, -: : �a� �' _ = _' r• _ — _ _, �. � � , ,. _ .- _ �:�+'r= .- - ,_J _J•� r.{'�.-. _a � � �i#�Ft3er� -� �� 3� -�G9F-R� ��;91�f2� -��32f�1M�jl � -�$ ' � 33 -5��1Y8 ��ve��4?�+ ��e� &�P{R) -f►& �� "' �� -�" &�{�}y �-88 � F� ( A�+�aal�et�! S�;4b8 S-�3�# I Z_� Item PrQ}ect F�om To Prim Citv Amount Total Annual # Sour j�] Amount I � Street Preservation Prolect S1IY 2-260 2.391 � Park Road — B�i�glns� the �.� � �� Vallev FederaJ � Sullivan Road F�tensfan @faeio�r Guld� ,CcmL � � j� Sullivan Road VVest Brl�lae BH � 4 •� �,Q Misslon Avenue F14ifl @�tl�t S� �4 1.551 3� �a�lce� Rasd Aoolewav �4�1 S�P 1$$ � � Park Road - #2 (CN onlv� Broadwav l�I� � �L4 ?.�?� ,'�7 3 Avenue E� �I �TPSS�LI 24 1?� }� Ever�tee[V�2� STPM 755 3,681 I E�� $ Barker Road � A�Pl�._Y l�SP �4 444 � St�livan Road (RW/GN onhr) Eudid YY4!l�1�1c �IPl�l ]�4 $� gZ Pines Corrfdor ITS °raSuQ � �MA� 1� Z� 4� Sullivan Roed Reha� lndiana EuclidQ $JPSP1 � 1� � 3 Avenu� Re�ab Dishman-Mira SR.27 STP(P.2 �9 Z� ( Annu�l Total i 4.589 ��:$ I �� 4i+s�-�', rfw•}=-�= i-r�� '-o R.:,�,�:� C�'�}-��: 5��I � �� {;} �ou� � - _ � - ; c�+:7 -� ��:� �-f :� � �,.a . _' �f�U'y9 $R -� ��8 �8 -N2F�F�i63�-� -�tv3��'Vajf �+�:3��3 �� -�i�4 -� ( Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-0� 200,9� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 54 of 58 City af Sp�kar�e� Walley �or�pr�l��r��i�e P��r� � � � �&tx"i �� ..�f� �-� �"�tis�i� '�le�f-�t�.-�.�?t:=se -�ir:'��-.'�e-*�fi�+�� ir �A� ti ,isc:L`}' ;;�,: . _ _ • �, r , ay ��t� � ^.`� _a - : r . . , . �� r.'�! - 7 a?'.. . 4 w-x r � r . .�.��1 #r^ r � - � . � � � � � �-Y--� � �f�v�i `' - �'�. - t1�4�'d�# !�','��! `� �-'�r��S � ��J+�°'�� -��{�9E�5+�'� � � �� -� � x;l �P�t'o� r� t •f'4. :��'r °� �' Y 1 ! C �4 -��:�tr-�� '��i- _k.';...�� a-� �$�i � -'�e�Tl�rl.� ,.,.iW,:�' k� �iWFT5�7F �� ,� �' � �I N P..y n D.a r � .'r � -�� -��'G`Cr�'� �1 �i^�'�� -� � - � � !�,'k��,i a.�dfr`��*� -ea�l�s �.�r�r - #'7 - 7� T � ��...�3� . �r g.. JS �t !1� � -s�� I �•ff`��-S - r .r � _'#i,i�P °e-.. -� � - -�� 1 ,�'i�'f�"#4's��'��'r 'F-.�� '��r'�i � ��'� � I�� i�E�r : Frorr� Tc� rima �Itv Amaun� Tvta1 �#nn�ua,� t� ��r�+� �$} rneun 5 Str+�t PE��ervatia� ��ai�ec't � � �.391 � 3�2 ��nue ��.q�t] � �� 3� Barker F:aad $_.. ��v4r 11�P ��{? 2,�449 � S+�II�r�� Roa� fR'JVt�N onlv] E�c �d W�I��l�v ��Pf�] �5. � d3 � li �r� o�tf Fteh In I n �uc�i� STR�i�) 12� � — � �isltr�aa�-Mica �� T�4 P�P� � 1.1�8 �¢i am han TrtZ�k L�ne � Citv �Irni�� S��J� 3�' � � Ao��l�nrav �xt�o�sls�n �L�.4 . � � � �4. � U�hr�rs Rc�ad [ntay -- 2 � - 4 — STPfPI — �7 �, - � lJnlrr�rr��ty� f�aad le��v �� f�ishm�r�-M#Ca �5 ST��F�� 2� 9� � �ark Ro�ad - #3 s�� ,�.� � 14i � Bar�ce�r �c�c� - - S[�ok�n�e �iw�r �� 1 � ',��Q'� F�+�ra E�d � � Eudl�9 �,ve1F#ara �a�d �T�[U� � .�Z� �a�+�i�d ��r� �� Anr�ual Total � �4i�1�7 ��3� 'T�k�l+e �4,3� $ix Y��C'��i ��t�t�� Im�rav�rrEe�t �ra�rarr� Sa�mma�r �0�9 Tk�rc�uoh 21�i� ��n ��.�1�k01 P � 'Y�ea:r Fed�ral 5ta�a C��r � Tc�l ��de�rai S�t� �th� � � r�ttal F�d�a# Stat� C�th�r 'r� Tota� � Ad��t�d �Rril 25, �L��6 ��Jpda#ed 41-�7'-��10�] Ch��ter � - �ap�t�� F��ilitie� P�� af �B Ciry of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan � �1 1.�� 4� � � 14�� 4� � 4� �1 �4� �a'44 1�� 't 7�4Z 18.439 �Q 1�,Q 1,�fi ?�44 � q� �Z,1� 1.759 1.647 ,� 9.023 9�? 1,'�,� 6 1 7,290 1 027 � � Q Q ,�Q�}7 4� � $,,�¢ 414 17 17.152 �$ 9.136 414 4� �$ 2) Q Q Q � � � � '� �1 �� Q,�,`! 404 4,,,�1 16 � Q Q Q �.�.�1 �$]. 14��. �]�4 414 ?� �? �.��4 �Q 41Q 41�4 24.348 �' Q Q Q �� Z.�.1. �� 1� � 1.14� ].Q.44� �$ � � 4 ��$ �� 1 1 6 44 775 1 7 4 7 1 33100 f - - ��-t�di��-Ta . � �� Fa�ar�i ��ta 6�ar �iFy �-e�t �nn� • n-� C�-�-% �$ :t3� �'s'*� C T�3-� �•n?ti �t�38 �-�'►•3,� S-� v'si-.�o &-�4� i-�r� �A �3 �-`_�; � &�ds6f 8 t►a,8�4 �r7� 24�-� 58 � 5�4� i3 528;88� �3 S� 58�8 S8 5�,8�A i� 28�d 5�8�� 52-�-� S-a �$ t-�t�;§84 �e�a} �9a4 t�&� �9 S�a� �,86� Table 4 40 Six Year Transoortation Improvement Pros�ram 2009 Throu4h 2014 (in 51,0001 L atch Wit Existin Resou Protect Name Proiect Deacrictlon Total Cost 8th Avenue PhasQ 1- Camahan to Havena Reconstruct 8th Avenue to a threa lane section with curb. �2.615 i n k I 8th Avenue Phase 2- Park to DickeY ReconsVuct 8th Avenue to a three lane section with cur�. 53.156 u er i Ik nd bike lanes Bth Avenue Phase 3- Dickev t4 Cama�han Reconstruct 8th Avenue to a three land section wtth curb. 53.811 I n ike Barker Ro�d ReconsVuctlon - 32nd to $�1 Spokane County Proje� reoonstruct Barker to 3 land � 'o • C' r ma Bawdish Road Rehab - 32nd to 8th &4.593 n adwa o r I f3avvciish Ro�d Rehab - Dishman-Mica t� � i ri and inl i'n ad SR-27lPinesM6th Intersection $3•132 ' n I n UniversitvlSnraaue Intersec�on PCC Reolace asphatt aavement with oortland cement ooncrete � TOTAL• � � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009, Chapter 4- Capital Facil�ties Page 56 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Potentlal Annexation AreaslUrban Services The Growth Management Act repuires that counties desiqnate urban qrowth areas (UGAs). The City of Spokane Vallev identified lands adiacent to the Citv within existing UGAs that would likely be develoaed for urban uses and qotentially be annexed to the City. In order to assess the need for capital facilities, the Citv has identified �xistina servi�e Qroviders within the Potential Annexation Areas IPAAs). This assessment should help identifv the effects a potential annexation area will have on existinQ levels of service. Table 4.41 Exlstlna Urban Servlce Provlders wfthtn Potentfal Annexatlon Areas (PAAs) PAAs Northwood Northeast Eas Southeast 3outh Ponderosa EdQeclfH Domesilc Water Pasadena Par1c Consolidate� Cons�dated Vera Vera S C. W Q. No 3 East Sookane Hutton Setllement ��i S.C. W.D. No� 3 � F b E F.D. No,) � 9 F. D, No.1 �,D• Na 1 F.O. No. 1 d 6 F.O. No. t� 8 F.D. No. 8 F.D. No. 1 d B Law EntorcemerR Sookene CounN Seokane CounN S�ak�ne CounN Sookene Court�r Sooksne Count� S�okane CounN S��Icane Carnhr Ub�ies S.C. Librarv Dis� S.C. Lbrorv Dist S.C. L�ran► Dist S.C. Lt�ran Dist. S.C. U�an Dist �.C, Ub�r Dist S.C. L�anr Dt�t Parks � Open S�sGe Sookane Countv ,�pokane Countv Sookane CounN Sookene Courttv Sookane CounN Sookane CaunM S�Icane Countv Public Schools W.V. S.D. 6 S.D. 81 E.V. S•p . v. s.o. C,V• S,D. C•V, S.D• V. ,D W.V. &D. � S.D. 81 PuMk Trortslt Nd eva�able Not ava��le Nd availebl� No v eble Npt avaiable Not evailable Not eve�abb Sanitarv Sewer Sookane Countv Sookane Countv Sookane CounN �kene CounN ��kane Count� Ngt Sewerg� S�dcene CounN So�ld Waste/Recyde Waste Mamt Wast t Wa W m Wasi� M o tl Waste Mamt. Waste M4mt Storm water Soak�ne CounN Srakane CounN S�olcene Co�N �okane Countv Sookane CounN Saokane CounN Sookene CounN Street Cleanino Soakane CounN Sookane CounN Saakane Countv Scokane Camtv Snokane Countv �icane CamN �okene CounN � S�oicane Co�mtv S�okane Cotmtv I Sookane CounN �oknne CamN Sookane Cotimtv Sc�ne CaunN Snokane CounN The City of Spokane Vallev has adopted Levels of Service (LOS) to measure a public facility or service's Op@ rational characteristics to gauQe its performance, The following analvsis will assess current levels of service in the PAAs to �rovide a context of how annexation could affect the City's LOS and arovide guidance for ahasing of annexations. Additionallv, the analvsis will vrovide Citv staff and elected officials information to assist in the planning and budqetinQ of public service deliverv as a resuft of annexation to the City of S�okane Vallev. The following study includes LOS ana�rsis for sanitary sewer and parks and oaen space, Analvsis is not provided for services where the Citv has adoated the minimum re�ional LOS. Senrices excluded from this analysis are domestic water, fire protection, law enforcement, libraries. Qublic schools, public transit. sani�ary sewer. solid wastelrecycle. storm water, street cleaning, and trans�ortation. I�a level of service is measured on a per caaita basis. the �o�ulation assumotions are based on Table 2.1(Land Ca�acitv Analys+s) in the Land Use chaater and S�okane Countv's estimated current po�ulation in the MetroQOlitan Urban Growth Areas (UGAs). The Cfir of Spokane Valley's land caqacitv analvsis is based on the adopted regional methodoloqv. Sanitarv Sewer The City of Spokane Valley does not provide sanitary sewer service at this time, Spokane Countv provides wastewater collection and transaort svstems within the Citv of Spokane Valley. Incorporated areas must hav� wastewater colleGtion and transport svstems in accordance with the adoQted sewer concurrency requirements. The table below provides a sewer assessment within the PAAs. Level of servi� is cat�gorized as sewered, within the 6-year sewer �lan, or not alanned for sewer. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 57 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan � jable 4 42 Sower asses ment wlthln Potonttai Annexatlon Areas (PAAsI In Act'es I PAAs Tota Sewervd Withln 6-vear Sewer not Peresntape C�p ered Northwood 1 82 Q7 0 4 77 � 0 1 � � 7 �h 1 1 Ponderosa 7 0 Edgedlft 7 Currently Sqokane County owns a caaaci� allocation of 10 million aallons per dav (mad) in the Spokane Advanced Wastewater Treatt'rtent Plant (SAWTPI. B y the year 2020, the Countv's flow is proie�ied to reach 21 m�d In 1999 S�okane Countv began a Wastewater Facilities Pian oroces to evaluate lonq- term reaional wastewater needs and to determine alternatives to meet those needs. The resu�t was a decision bv the Board of Countv Commissioners to build a new S�okane Countv Reaional Water Reclamation Facilitv (SCRWRF) St�okane Countv is aropasin to construct a new reaional wastewater treatment alant at the Stock yards site in the Citv of Spokane. The new treatment �lant and associated facilities will provide add�tional capac'rt for in�reased wastewater flows Qenerated bv the Countv's Seatic Eliminati�n Propram and for projected �rowth in the Countv's service area. Manv of the PAAs have �p services however new develo�ment will continue to add demand for new sewer services. The C�tv should evaluate existinq sewer treatment capacitv and infrastructure prior to annexation. Parks and Onen Saace The CitY of Saokane Vallev has an adopted level of service Qf 1.92 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. In 2007 Sc�okan� Countv commissioned a fiscal studv of the Urban Growth Areas IUGAsI. The report focuses on the services provided bv Spakane Counhr to the metropolitan UGAs and the revenue Qenerated for S�okane Countv in these ereas. The report established a base pooulation in the m etroc�olita� UGAs usinq 2000 Census data and buildin uermits The estimated aoaulation for the UGAs adiacent to the Cfir of Saokane Vallev wes determined to be 7 294. The Citv of S�okane Vallev 2007 Land Quantitv Analvsis (LQA) estimated the I�nd caoacitv in the PAAs could ootentiallv add 13 406 additional residents Usin the population estimate frorr� SQOkane Countv's fiscal studv and the C'ttv of Spokane Vallev's estim�ted land c�aacit there is the �otential of 20 700 residents at build out in the PAAs Current)v thera are no oarks in the �AAs If the City annexed all the PAAs 40 acres of partcland would be needed to meet the curtent level of service of 1.92 acres. Accordinq to the Cit_,y's Park Master Ptan mar�y residents in the Citv of S�okane Vallev are not convenierttiv tocated near a oark The Citv's Pa�lc Master Pl�n states that parks should be one of the highest oriorities for the City The plan a�so �tates that meeting Park needs can be a challenQe in �gig hborhoods where little vacant land exists Manv residents ex�ressed a desire for saorts fields (compl8xes) theS� facilities,9eneraltY re4uire I�rge vacant oroperties The C' should consider p�r h� i q parkland prior to annexation to ensure adequate facilities will be available to serve neighbofioods in Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs). � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Cepital Facilities Page 58 of 58 - "_ - - - - - - - - - - ,��: -�- =, - � - -- -- - - - ;- -��.�� - ,� - -' - - - - - - - ��- ,- - - - � _ . Map 4 1 : ' �� , _�- � � `- r;;. , o+anc� n � , = wN�+ • � � � / j�� % � ar4 � � (�mpan�,�`ta,'' � 2�a3 ; { �� `-� If��qiM1A J � � ' � r � �t � ^ W�ter Districts & ( �3 � � �' r- 1 y.7hr �rt!�� -- '�_�� u �� lS � � �� JI !,ti'' = � 1 � � ,{� � � ' � ' � ' � � � � ""` Well Heads � � � µ. 1 � , fR � � lbm�MWcd`'� � � � ,`� �I IlWibn � Irti� iun � � =l � IrnCntuin ,�Sif�l -_� - F" � � "f �. ._ . i—.Sr111ra1tAt -- • -- - -- � —U��trul Il'�L -- - � � - :f - blMr � �) � � � � � � � Tinibcrim� � m � � i � � I � � ' ' ' ' 1 � = ' i ti1a4Ut � � ilome 1'nr1 � / � � � i '- •4 I� S�r.la, , � a 1 _ �' I �'i 1 /�) _ t�l-1 t111i �v, r � tn' T" / � �, !�w�► � LCgeDd ' i — k, �--�-.- - - � ' i�� \� � � � � � �, � � '` n,Sour � 1 `� h,,,�,_ _ I �i�'' �apv {A+ua h*vrra� - •.y, -- -- ir'ri�x '�- .7�cn�»im - - - ; } , D�t'r7i i�. �� ,• � .,,� � � � � � � Gp� ol9ookarn Wal�r �via �- � � � IRM 1Vi f U rl K � �� : • C'nt ��kaM I 'Gr�.r. � �{ ; ' N 'drr se � w - �! �" � �'` � � Gry of SpokMt V�Ye� ` t I �� f � 11 I� i� /y �� ' i I' ' I - � ' _ • i I � � � ' • Y�q � W� {'�� / 1 _ � _ •� � M� 1 �..J � � � ur u t �'t'. nuduls��a � �"�! T .-- ` - Z' ; • proup D W�11 Htadr (i�uit .�r�kRil(''(�ouM�- _ .1 — � ry, {f11 h linX+�t�m Y nlidsl[d �� - r � '� � � ��'a{�i i�lr�tt � M�i�r.l'n�l� � � � i ir4 I � i litf��n� � ]'� I C �� r �- - - � UftiY1CIlOW1�lAlY ` _ • FS t � 1� _ 4 �I �II �l� / � .1 ' 1- - ' � .. --� _� .I _ ' s.., \� � '�' ' � W.ar sodas '} _ . �'a s ' _ y,. �_ � _ � � �1M „_ � � • � � � L'+�') ■ � i • - I I � � .� 1 C�� 1 Ylfy_171YM � T I I��+. � �� I � ' � liff��lv+n , . � �� I � i Iri[I r' � [liilf+:rt��5'r • Ir fn IKttk I � � � _ � _ ,_ 1�'8 � .amp � �� . � � _� � � i fii � � �� s o I � � � �� ,� l� � � .fl�f � � � ' 1-P' .l�1 ' j� � j �! � ` ' ' r .�� -x � � � i � 1 � � r � � , � 'W�l ' _ � I I �, � �- < < �' . -- - _ --. � � I � = y'� . ,_ . � • C T�i� � + - - _, . ��r« -� '�tt tipc�l nr' ; �, P L I � ��uuwlnLlt�� - , " � .N Nt r ..- _ '- _ � ' � � � I� � - Itrl:tlr�w � Di��rirt AI � � � - . _ � ,� I � � UM�rxf �Y� � ' 1 ` � 1 I.a - ��• . � � � � � y'�. � � ' ,� -. � (lh of � � _ ~ ' - _ � p .�rf� � � I � , : \ � StrS�a4aae � : w - = �--� - I �_ _ • )p . 2v � W� cr irnic� � �� 1 h , - , 1 � i �km� C'e u�! • -r � � •nr - �► 7 � { �- -. 'w.��na��Ei , , - - - - � sm� � �`� �1 �/� t / �- � �rl�arkm� n n'� � � � � M�P Lac�tloa - � - - - �y� ... � � � � � � � _ _ � ` � � �.. _ , � �;- � r In�a ion Uht►kt `IS �� . Q J3M � � � • � � (m�at,jla , � � N! I f � � � � `;� .t�� r1 r /: � � � � � i t� � � S- , - � �t � � ]2 � � �, DrN: t=!2]/200� � 1 � � • . - s( � �: ; ; �'� � , P i I � � i `� ^ �y i s , ^ �� P . . � I + �.,_...tlMi r � y --� - rr-� � �� i ��i' . - `. —a- . ^ — -- �� .�.. ..__ . _ a - ..._ . -- -- — --- . - . -�- � . � � .� 1 � `� � 'i � � i � 1 � - � _ � � I�ni atr � ,� ___- i Y � � 0 •� 1 2 MdM �) � //-'� � ` _ I �� I ` 1 � � � 1 � i � 1 01 ,� I/ u; � '� 0 } ( 27 1 i � Nertcy' ]iw �r�arwafMw �horw o� tlw w� i� rnwNkd JFaw wriun K ry ��y i ww � � � �9 fmly�e[�Cawih � � �' • � � A � A � wMr�rr �wf u awly�a> ro co�uoN �vbn. T)r C!q• maliv �o rlww� I L� 2 �"' 3 ' + �,�6 f R's�rr t1H�rtct �. � � � Z�.+$ ��nsvwtaa alau els marsRy �r n�+rntY of 11W w� ewal �� a�nsdy �riaiwr IaMhfr JM nfu►r w�dawrarldni �n q� m�knfr. � � � � � u�nnm r2 � _ cp�, ty.��> � � I'�. To nqA.. �cs++�� c.�� r q4 u/a�o�► re�.y. [drw...q $ i ��^ � � � 'H•�cf �i.�rr� � � lln.rhy�n�Ar�senR/k►t�wr�N1'/war�(300JO:!•J000 � � �UrSi��M IS I �,_ -'� ' ` -� `' � , � '1 � � �_ � .. � � � n.a,.�.ia.nry.r}aw�'.M.�M M.�.�n�sr ,�, w � _ _ � _ � � r.s�. I l!r!+� � L�' �1.. . . - — � `�-- I � -� : ,� Map4.3 , . , '� � � � � --�� k . �� . �� _ _ _� .�, � -_= _ - � ' �� ; : r �,,� i Parks & Recreation i ' '' .., z � ` ^ _ � � , , � w.l.'� ', � � _ � ; ��-' �� •d� � , -� �.. �i � � �-` � �-. I � � I��.r_I r � � j' i �'i,_. City of �� • _ _ _ _;_l1,_, � �.♦ � �' �� ir. � �� y — I S alcane ' �� •---�• W �,, �-: � �'� _ � Com.eilyArt r $wl.ii� Ir4 . �- r i �� . ~�'-� • A � � � Y�.�r.Y l ��c A.� I • �� /� 4 - C�/�i�1�YYYi�Y �Mr�rW. � i �l� • - r'i ` .. j -- - K�L� - lM� �dr ��C3 + 1 r -�•• •• • � --�� - _i _ _ .. .. �' _ - �T/� A�� k � •- . Y 1 �' - . t . - .1r► n� 1��i : � �� 1 ��tiii_ ji►`r � - �NCli��r�� M� f • illHd �x— !�! _ ',:� -+� � . ' c�. �! ' 1 '� iE±. . : _ i� • _, g �. �� j_j__"�.J_ i - �y. _ `1,, 1- �/�KOt�� 1 � ..� �K {" �'��r �t s • � }� � � L.! - M . `l� � �{I� Q�.� V� h'!k ! }� {��t I � � �M�f • / �. �� :, -� I � � +_ _ ' � � �..�1...�Jru� L ', _ - .., . �w�.r�..... p � s►• I -t� :':�- ` _-_. w - �- � g�"-"' 1.. r� w�f�r % � � -'t�. rw.� �� I i' Sl �C = ' CI�'�� L--' ��r1fQMi`AIr _ , � �w.�• ' _ �,�it�rty � wwrfod'ar •- � { �a .i 1! - - �, fil»�w ui r�. • � � ti1 � � n..,.r � L.A�it - - � 4 , �' � , Mi�11Y�t/�1 ir R +-p`+ -1'1b' ,n1p k'r" � ttt{1�Md SyMwll � �.; l�.+i.i �' I r� I � - _. " �' - � - i > I i �- !�- � J _� � �'M -� � ��E�Tnih Y- _ . �, '� +- � � i µ -._ 1 � � - ' T` � � -�- . . � • � / � � hnP{�a�d h�Js _ ' I �I - .- ' i ._. - _ j��l�:r � r , tf0� raf�{/ � .f. y ' - ��h + r C — j • "� '^� - - - �; �1= � -' - - -1- �' �► m" _ -d�. '��' L_. ��G' ..� t � .nAr % �� • j1 I M lT� � .� � _ � � �! "�^ -. u '�i � - C �- e ' U � � � Y�oPad Sp�ei�l Uw MM � I � . ,��` �' s .�� _ ��op�+d Cam�r !tk � �� , `'� �fil� �� ,--- � ---� ' � �..d�� ,.- -� , �- - ( , ;, , ; . � � � , � �3 1._....� _ , Wf' r r�; �' - "_ •• ' -- � �� r� , ; � � ;- . � � . � � 1 '� � i(�., r , �i.Gi� �,�' ''� • . �"� � • � r � `' , � �[`; i , � � � ?w�, ,.�:1 � �iiA`� _ � r � ; • • i -�-- • � � � Aii��. - • � . I , � y l l, i'� lIMI \' _ � `t�" i + aLw � ( � �'3� �� • • �� " / � A .i. � � � c'F � �.00�I1f�11 '� � � . .♦ •�� `. � . � '_ ti� � - 1 ._ � i O " � --'� t �1 , C 2 � I Y 1------ . � r � D�le l YLYM . _ � � � . ��. " ��I P � �� A ten � '�' � � E . � — 1 . 1� � .,_. � . _ � �� h\ . � � . ;-�"� , - � -� _ �— � 1 .. � _ � � o a.s i 2 �u.. �''��' � � . � � �,- - - �� I t . , , ► . . . , � [ (��arn�i4 ! / �+ . / �� - /� _ �..J ` 1VoAK�' lI» uJwtwalaw �h��rn �n Ow w� a a+ryrkd�rw +,ar�nv �• .- � 't-- � � asrrau an/u rbjru �, nsawr rnuer� 7hc CNyma►n wu dr�s � � � �}}� l � � •__ \��: c � I �,IGda�irf.�ulirh�wnr�.r,�n.�l��a Y� � � . � �a' � ,, � � ' ; J: " � e•+�J '' r °^*rM..r,atk�.�.cu^+,�o�r�..a,K Oovi vi. a ` i� '��—_�,�_.._��' � �-, �' � � � r....�.rrcr..��r+�.v.rf�cr.�.rr�►�+as.n.�r l 1 1 � 1 � � 1 !' 1 � 1 ; ! 1 1 � o l p � ' � . � 1 � i 1 1 � d � � ' � --' � --= � ---g --- � --- � --- � -- � - � -- Map 4.5 �►uM _-- g ___ ---J--- �__� -- � ---- -�� .__�_-1-----f-----'- _�_ -�.- _-I� = -�_ _1- _J�l � -1- -�' �f ---'- --r i- t � � - i � � � , , � � � � ; � � � ; � � � ' � � Siuic-Year Sewer Projects , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , � � � � � � � ' � � � ' � - - -- � - ---� --� -- �MW�-----•-----�-----L__ _.. " ----'-----•--__�_-__-�---- ----- •- --�--- - �{-- -�- T- � � � � � � i � � � � � i i � � � � �` ' � � i � � ' � � i � � � �� i � i � i i � � � . � � � - � :ule � S� � � � � '~� _4nn. _.Ii - -- ' J---- �� ---- ' -- "��, K '� .�w�.. ---- ��:• . -__ 1L-- � � ' • tt rt 1 ��y nr � � � � _ .. _ ' 1 _ � � �� • � � '""'� 't,; u�' `"""' ' ug� _�a��$Pokane�---- � ' - - � --� �---- - ---•- �-� -- - ---- --- .��-- ; � -r - - - - - - - - • F - , � � � � �' -�' - - � � ; � Q G,� �tsoo�. v.u�r �►r � _ � � �; � � , � � � -- - ' � � � , ,,,,,�,-�'"' � � ! ; � ' �- - � v�e.p ao.�e �,.. � 1 � � .��! ��- � � � � � � � � � � w r� - � � . � �"J' _ . _ ��-1Nt� • _ - - -� .s� - - - � - r,. lv�►I� v� I��f��00 �,r•.. _ • M , l ' i _ _ . _ � _ ' ..'�* _ � � � A�kaitjpd Anr ' � � , "� • i ' � , �C � ; : � � � � /,+� �'. ,..... � .rs* � � � ,�..r., p � W�p80� � ' � ��% � � ��.��_ .� � _ �--"�+� � :1Fl�„ � � � 1 � � � � � � � -' � " '�'" •..... '�, ' �:INIi �• � r, i,l y _ _ "`y:.- � � " � � � ' 1 � � � � ; � n �� ,. � � d �Yar V� Swtn � � �.r.... o , • '��rw,-r.�r � � � � � 3h Ywr C�#iall�qetw�Nl �Ir -� I- - - - - � - - - - w�«..•.. .�. � .�. .,.�� i•»..'..e � ZJ .,.», ...�.... ,� a- � "�� ! rlt� c rt r 6 Yar QT (2003-3010) � ....��; • q9 , -p , � � :u�« , ��` :�n�� , � ,�.,i.� M � '±��' � I M � �.' � ; ,"�, a � : \ "'; t �� Ln k e � - � - s.,ne.d , t '� ; � ; _�r. .�.,�n� � � ' { f � A, ` � � ,w..��=+�.s,�n �� - i ,�,� 1� ra �. � .. .. ��w bllt'O�bA • �r��.�A ' �i��T�:{.� n.��Wr..•.�. _ � a '� �i p ,,,....._�i�' - .��,!"u � :u,i ' ; cd�.aou � i f'�l, � � 4 � � A :in��U1�N ��r... 2D10 �t�l� � � � � . �11�CJfld � � - � i . � � � yr.. .�� s wr�.�.. z,R.�...... �..� �r-:�. - - I' . -^ T'ij' ..r �I.t ��,;'f`, _ .�r.�..nlr �� -� / ��iVw ..! _�N� � :1� FI o .��, t i � v�.� ��e�.. �'�•. -�i �.1h� �. • fNY! ~ � 1. � 1.1� � r � , �Mi�i _ � `� � 4�1 � 'I rPl,l�,' ' . _F � � _ ' " ('.� L1�y'A� fy�Y. .. _ _ rwi e � � ; * ; � z� • . �� . � t- :ia�w � 1 � • = r i ! ?fIV� t � • _ � 1 I � Uwr� � � '. � � � �arn� _ I r. ,r, � � � � � - - - - � - - � - _1�' � ' � i - - i.,, , � r.� ', - � � ; - ' 1- � - - , . ' � � � 1 , `�t� y �� ' � I � � �1 i � , f � 1 � � - � � � � 1 � � � t {.� . • 1 �� 1 � � 1 1 � � 1 ' I f w � _ _ � _ _ ► �I� � � � � � � _2AOl:, _ � � �� _ _ _ _ ' „ _ _ _ �� • � � � � J� ' � _ ' ' . _. � :�R�.� , r �.� . ��w .� ' , � � 1 r 1 � 7 � � T � :+nn�•` �^ • 1 � 1 � � 1.001�bA � 1 � � 1 1 � �� 1 � 1 � � � � 1 � i 1 �I j � 1 � '� � � t � 1 � � 1 � 1 � M 1 _ � t _l�i _ _ � t � � � � ' � ' L � � �� --�� ..J�� `:�� _ .1' � 1.:---- + --- __ L ___�1�-__� ---- r_-__.I�� - .w. u:.... - � -t.� ' � --�;- - � - � - � � � � � 1 � � � i � � � i , � � � � � � i i � � � � � � � � � � . � i � � � i WM' IYlll� � 1 � � ' � ' _ � � � - '--------�-�---- �__--i----'' p J -'� , . � � � � � , � A . � � � � � � � , • � � � � � � , i � � � � � i . � � i � � � � � �1 � � :G11 • ' ' � � � . � � � � 1 � � • � � � t � ! � 1 . ____t_-__ � .__1____ � ____�___J�PP � �--- �-�---'�- � �': -- � �--- � ��- � � � � 0 US 1 2163� i T � � � � � �' ' � � � � . � � i l . , , � . . � � � , • � � � � � ' � � � � � � � � � � ' � � � � � � � � � 1K,ncv Thr u�rwt+an iAorw un Mw � N nf�ukd/ua mrrean i • � � � � � i ` - r � � � � � � � � i � � � , � � �nMit� rrsl n nJ�Irl Ar esatW rn�aiwn. TM Cl y inaku nu rArwa � � � � � � `y . � : (27'� ' - ° $ d $ � ar tw,�+i+rs �wr thr ss++nq� a► e�n�cY �/ MV we' is�d � s � �' � � ' � : ;^ � § � i �Pi*nlya�fawr fMlaAryJMsnwirsdcr�w�wr�nwc�kMrr -�4 --�---- ----$---- �;-----°� �� ---- ----r S` rt+ra�lnwecewacrtn�MU�Y+AroRp.�rSpts.wruteRr.ra.nrwi{v � ' � - - � - � � - � � � - - � � � � � i � � i � i � � � i []nrfqrniwl DqMVts�tnt DMswn njP4wn�ry4 rJOD1971 � � � � i � � � � � � � � � � i � � � i � n.r.� .1 iw ctif .� 4r... v+�. trr.rb 0�+.�..� ow«...+ , � , � i � � � � i a er - a u ra . nv�ronmen � �� . �- ,- � , � . : ,, R : � . . - � I : 1 �- , - ,� '�"' �, , n � ; _ , �.��; .--�'� � � �' �� ---- - -.�..1..�� , � � ; f '�I�i.'�i11i� i; _ �. ��! [:iMr� - L'"� � � � � -' ; •L�,,..J•: � _�'!!'L� � _ _ '^ .rC .ri� _ �' .� ��';� _ � � • f _ Sr �' � , �1 ,� .` � I .� � ~ . � i��` � � '.i. ::.JIA ��# : � .F ' f - � .. �� - - - � �/� ��:�� 7' - .� ►- s � r �±, - � _ � �� .�!r:: �I�� f?'�77� �� w � �•r � ,� � •, �� .��.s'''��. , � �t i - -�,�_^,�� . 1 ^ "':I �� _ , •'� �� r�� I � . A • 1 _ _ Y. �� ' i� � rii . � -J . ' T"^' � �fl � . � " } = I� --.l�� 1L ! •w�.cK--.. `,,� ,r �e� � ' � � ` � .� ��rt�f�� . �� '-;. � 4�: � !��iA�'." !�}1�i'��Iri�ti � I� r , .��..� , • �u.�■��■i1�..r:�,.s.r .�i �7�� ._..,i� �_ �` ` ;�'�•� -- � � �� . � � � � ��• r�� '' ��r' � �� 5 l��i/ � .. � � r �. �,,� ` 1fii. - � � �_ � .�i � " � ` .. r :r�� ' . i: , J �� ! �' i. � � . �A.� �.� � ....�...►:. r....:�. - _ , . � �� • k ° , `j•=,� - � '- i� �� a ��.1', II�N �. ��. ' � r:� 'r�! � �ii� -;��i� � 1� - � 15i '� '' � i�.'�' + '1 ' _ � , �` , • '�� i' :,4` - �.��f_ ��w1i,,�1 Yre.r.lu.-.� ``�y� /. � � T � '� '�� '�� Y 1 � , �� F h� �. / �� rY.yt�_ , ♦ f_�ls,J■ ti �{�� w�•�� t,. g i'i.�`�7 r .�_ . , .f�. � � - y%:. ►. . - ;� � ._�' �� i - � � ' � �` �� F• , �r _: ; �' ' ''• r� i �t� � `' � - � /� _� ` � �;� • , �,` � � �� .,. � � � � � N — ..,. � ' � � .� � � � ' ~� � —� '�• � , � ' � I .�� , �ii ��7�1r _ L��► ...� �� . . �� • ' ` r� _ ,. .� . , ; �==�,'� , ' �- �� Ma 8.3 ..� t �� j � � ., p � '-' � �.�."`"`=-- `�� ' � �� Fish & Wildlife Habitat � j � � '' ,t � , - -r � � � -tl � - - �' , , ',' - - ..r � �. �// � r , � � s �[` 1 `_ " t,, ;tr.- , � , � /� � � � ° ' - � . � � 1 _! - 3 _ " �L � ( t� � $w��_� , ��f l 1 1 _ ��',T 1 �� / ■. .,.,� .. ' i .� �� , � � � "Y � �_, _ - iyi ' I w t y � � � �.'°� - - F �.� , � f � ; �� _ ' � � .?` —,��; i �� _ --��, - — `1 �, - � ` � �� ,__ I � L� ' � ` �ry - �� " _ ' ` � �'� " • " G � ! � J Cl� O� �O�Y �� "^�"�7 �Z . —i �t' _ — �� r . I_ _ .1�wlApwNRh rI � �(� I J � � � ._ft1#�� \ � Tr ; ►� �1 � �}Y�f r� — • �. t1'w�,�� "' '.'_� � � ..M'��2!_.. 1 11 r•�. _y_— ��_LL{ - � - -�+F,}"+i „' �, � % �� 'It,��.r..' � Wk�1rT�il�dDwr M "„4° F � ` �; ,.. • f • � - - � �' ', . "' ' . � `� '�",� % I �� Aloor I "i � f `'` �k !l�biw � -- - �: , , _ ��` � _ ` . r», .�. i - '•• i ��:1 , _ u,M waral ov.. Sp.�. g`]f4''� � l - �! .��"r ._ 1 i �� j�' l' 1- d...' i �i � S) � -�yPYLLYI 7.MN _ �� ((�� ' � i �{ _ {-A- L�.nfS4..w�= �' 1 1; � � �` � w�.� � \ ' � !- ' , _ _ � - " i ' ±+± :- �"'r'� _ - - - • � �n r � . � ; — _ � , � _ � u�e.a c�as M.. N_. � �- - � � �i � � w�K dtldl�t � � .«.+�..« - { 1- � �' .( . - � _� ,—�� — I _ . + _ _ �- -1 � � -� = ��=-�- —�' — 1 " ^ � �� 'L1, ' . ��_ �_ . ` DNR Streaa '�'pe - - ��,.-.1: � � - . /� ,.C " .�. � _ _ /r '. -_ ��`� � .. �I - . � �� .:IJaI• /� t Nn J M .•, � — ; � l`�/ � .IYYS� 1 � � a t � �- / - - - - � ' (� Puh N.biw � _ J :� i _ ~�-!! l �� ` � � / ,: � t , j � � ' � � � ' � ::��: � �►. i� i � � ,1 � 1 -� 77� � - ' -- � i r � �00�� Illif � a , �� /� � I • _ ' �, � (U) [Inbfowa , � �� ' 1 fi - - �' 1 ~ y � f ' `� ��, , � 1 -� �,; � � � , .1 I � � ��_��.�(Y 1 ' _ °' � ' �-` _- � e � 1' S � �� ' � �� - • �1 � � : i.. �� / � _ '�+� 1 R � 1 � , ' � �i. � � �/ =- . � -, � , . �rJ J _ � t i , `` �� , - 1 � � � /�/ / /�J� � � L LOCMIDO � � � �/ ' /' _ 1U � �- � � — — � � /� � i'— ,� j' 1 ��/ / �/� '. . F + i _ � ��j� ' _— " — _ ! 11 / � J J �' 1 1. . - .// r � �.� �J //� � t . - ' •s'1` . . . u � . . � . -- � ' - � � � ,/ ��/ / / J / . �- ti- i `� � ' ' + � � , DNa13lJ��/i01� • . J / f� �� r !' ~ � • _ i� 1 � �P , y�f, ,,,,, � � � � / / ♦ : _ _ � � t .. ' �� % / �l �� '.r. ;�� u.; ' '- �. - • � , , � � ` •!L-� �!�/ � '� '� . I :. h ;: _ `�„,t �. 'C � � � // ' °' � � i 'ti � t .;k�� '�"c� _I" .,,�, r �� .��. _ - - _ ' / • f !J 1� . � - . ' � i � . Z � _ _ _ -.�, y ;�,+ _/ •�� /�r �� . � � • ,, �` ��I ...-,� �i� i # �` � `'q '• 1'" � /'/�( 1 � ,f � , ��J''i ,/ _ . - �-a t,Y� � f ,� /1/ � � / + � ;� 0 0 ! I 2 ►�W� ,��,��'r�/ � / / J 1 _ ' � `/// � /.`J_ �, _ i , ��.,� � / �r `� .. '� � } 1 � . , , � . . . � 1 ( � J. ;�b I / �I//� , Ir i ' �� / .�� 'I�..I.' �� i � � /:' ` � � , � '� , • � � ' �, f ; •. i 1 � � f � ` / .�/ / . ,� � • � � / � / � , s / / .'vtlo 11M 4�(ara�rx� �d�orw a� Ihtr � it trynArdAoR wtwn �} ,l� ^ ;, . r,�. ., -. �� /�� / � R � ,, ,aw wrlir e�ct r esrWr mairr� Tfr ('Ip sbi nn cla�av I � �v� ��!��• ��!��•r' � •f /� / `, �� ':� J/ �� '�`/ / ��,- - i //, � .�nNes��tNrninnsy�r�nrwryofdurrpad •,41 , k' � � � '^�' .e�, '`!%5�' � � / � � �� j 1 ^. � �/ � / ,� :,�vrn,kJu'l�an hul+Myki+tt+wtadnrurwu rn itrarM��. � f' � �• �/� / /�� y ' J � . //�// , ��,, � // `/ � , � •' nr{6r� n'twwY �M Ih► ntl' 4lS�+�n► dfA Caw�n�aA � .' ': � �v� � �` / � � /�'J i" �� l /� % / ! / / -i • / �� / � . � : walrpwww(k�we�, Dwluun �ltluwi� lSAYI V:!-lQDO . � � �- _ �•+., - � •/' �' � -� ♦ // �� /F t ` / � / // �� , r ///�� I / � �, I ' /� " +� �1r UI� J �/.� ii. �h 1�� .._ _ /` � r r � i ' ClTY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 12, 2009 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply ❑ consent ❑ old business � new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin, report � pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 09-009, Official Zoning map amendments GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A (Growth Ma�agement Act) PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: On April 14, 2009, Council deliberated on comprehensive plan amendments CPA-01-09 through CPA-08-09. BACKGROUND: The Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan includes an annual amendment cycle that runs from November 2 to November 1 of the following year. The Planning Commission considers applications received prior to the November 1 deadline in (ate winter/early spring of the following year, with a recommendation to City Council in late spring/early summer. All parts of the Comprehensive Plan (maps and text} can be amended during the annual cycle. The "ommunity Development Department received one site-specific Comprehensive Plan map amendment; city iaff initiated three site-spec�c Comprehensive Plan map amendments. Sites that are approved for a Comprehensive Plan Map amendment automatically receive a zoning designation that is consistent with the new Comprehensive Plan Map designation. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PROPOSALS: Comprehensive plan map amendment proposals are organized into individual reports consisting of application materials, staff reports, maps, and letters submitted to date ta assist the City Council's review. The Spokane Valley Planning ComrY�ission conducted a public hearing on March 12, 2009, to consider proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. After hearing public testimony, the Commission made recommendations on CPA-02-09 through CPA-04-09. Further research was requested on CPA-01-09. On March 26, 2009, the Planning Commission held a hearing and made recommendations on CPA-01-09. OPTIONS: Adopt Ordinance 09-009; remand to Planning Commission for further consideration; or conduct a public hearing on proposed deviations from the Planning Commission's recommendation. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS: Move to adopt Ordinance 09-009 STAFF CONTACT: Greg McCormick, AICP, Planning Division Manager; Mike Basinger, AICP, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Draft Ordinance 1 of 1 1 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOK:ANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 09-009 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE Vt�iLLEY, SPOI�:ANE COUNTY WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE 07-015 WHICH ADOPTED THE , QFFICIAL ZONING MAP; AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATT`ERS ' PROPERLY RELATING T'HERETO. WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley adopted Land Use_plans and reguladons as set forth in the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) and the City of Spokane Valley Zoning Map through Ordinance No. 07-015; and ';� , W�-IEREAS, the Washington State Growth ' Management Act (GMA) allows comprehensive plans to be amended annually (RCW 36.70A130); and �;; W�REAS, amendments to the City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan may be initiated by the Planning Commission (Commission), .;the City� Council (Council) or by the ' Community Development Director based on citizen 'requests or when changed cond.itions warrant adjustments; and �;,, , ' �,�, ; WHEREAS, the GMA requires ` comprehensive plans ,, to be implemented with development regulations, including the zoning of '_;,property consistent with land use map designations; and � , ' '' ; ;'- ''� . .., �' �' W�-IEREAS, zone changes �under consideration with the annual Comprehensive Plan amendments are to .be considered `as area-wide rezones pursuant to 17.80.140 of the SVMC; and � � . ;, ; W��REAS, consistent �vith the GMA� � City of Spokane Valley adopted Public Parkicipation Guidelines to direct the public involvement process for adopting and amending comprehensive plans�and `area-wide rezones; and _; � . WHEFtEAS, the Spokane Valley Municipal Code provides that amendment applications shall be received until Novembgr 1 of each year; and ' . , �„ WEiEREAS; applications were submitted by the applicant, owner or by City staff to amend the Comprehensiye Plan and Zoning Map for the purpose of beneficiaily using the property described herein; and WHEREAS, following the application to the City, staff conducted an environmental review to determine the potential environmental impacts from the proposed amendments; and VV;E�REAS, after reviewing the Environmental Checklists, staff issued a Detennination of Nonsignificance (DNS) on December 19, 2008 for the proposals, published the DNS in the Valley News Herald on December 19, 2408, posted the DNS on the sites and mailed the DNS to all affected public agencies; and Ordinance 09-009 Zoning Map Changes Page 1 of 6 WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development was notified on February 27, 2009 pursuant to RCW 36.?OA.106 providing a 6-day notice of intent to adopt amendments to the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan; and VVHEREAS, the Commission conducted a briefing on February 26, 2009, to review the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, notice of the Comnussion public hearing was published in the Valley News Herald on February 20, 2009; and �� , . ,;, WHEREAS, on February 20, 2009, notice of the Commission hearing was mailed to all property owners v��ithin 400 feet of the subject property ; and WHEREAS, notice of the hearing was posted on the subject properties; and , WHEREAS, the Commission conducted a public hearing on March � 12, 2009 at which time the Commission received evidence, iaformation, public �estimony and a staff report and recommendation; and � � � � � WHEREAS, the Commission, at the conclusion of the public hearing and af�er deliberating on the proposed amendments and information presented during the course of the hearing developed recommendations on site=specific map amend.ments� CPA-02-09 through CPA-04-09. Further research wns requestec� An site-specific map amendment CPA-01-09 and CPA-OS-09. The Commission requested m.inor changes to t�le Public/Quasi-Public provisions in CPA-OS-09. The Commission continued the public hearing to March 26, 2009 for CPA-01-09 and CPA-OS-09; and � . � � , . WHEREAS, the Commission deliberated on CPA-01-09 and CPA-OS-09 on March 26, 2009; the Commission recommended appro.val of a11 amendment proposals; and WHEREAS, on;I�7arch 31; 2009, Council reviewed the proposed amendments; and , , � WHFREAS, on April 14, 2009, Council considered a first ordinance reading to adopt the proposed aniendment; and `�,; ; � I :. WHEI�EAS, on May� 12, 2009, Council considered a second ordinance reading at which time Couneil approved �`7itten findings of fact setti.ng forth their basis for recommending approval of the propos'eci amendments. NOW, T��EREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley do ordain as follows: Seehon 1. se. The purpose of this Ordi.nance is to amend the Official Zoning Map adopted through Ordinance No. 07-015 in order to permit the property described herein to be used in a matter consistent with the same. Ordinance 09-009 Zoning Map Changes Page 2 of 6 i c' n 2. Find' . The City Council acicnowledges that the Commission conducted appropriate investigation and study, held a public hearing on the application and recommends approval of the amendment to the Zoning maps. The City Council hereby adopts the findi.ngs of the Comnussion, specifically that: ection 2. Findin s. The City Council aclrnowledges that the Commission conducted appropriate investigation and study, held a public hearing on the application and recommends approval of the amendments to the Zoning Map and tex� The City Council hereby adopts the findings of the Commission, specifically that: 1. Notice for the groposed amendments was placed in �he Spokane `'alley News Herald on ' February 20, 2009 and each site was posted with a"Notice of Public Hearing" sign, with a description of the proposal. � 2. Individual notice of the map amendment progosals was mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of each af�ected site. ' ' 3. Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA — RCW 43.21C) environmental checklists were required for each proposed comprehensive plan map and text a.mendmen� : 4. Staffreviewed the environmental checklists and a threshold�determination was made for each comprehensive plan amendment request. Determ.i.nations,�of Non-significance (DNS) were . issued for the reyuested comprehensiye plan arnendments �on �December 19, 2008. 5. The DNS's were published in the city's of�icial newspaper on`December 19, 2008 consistent with the City of Spokane Valley Enviro �nment�il ��rdinance. � 6. The Spokane Valley Planning Convnission conducted a public,_h'earing on March 12, 2009, to consider the proposed amendments. After hearing public testunony, the Commission made recommendations on CPA=02-09 thru CPA=04-09 and e�ccluding CPA-01-09 and CPA-OS-09. 7. The Commission co�tinued the public hearing for CPA-O 1-09 and CPA-OS-09 to March 26, 2009. � � � . 8. On March 26, 2009, the. Comrii,ission made recommendations on CPA-01-09 and CPA-OS-09. 9. The planning goals of the Growth' Manageinent Act (GMA.) were considered and the � proposed a�nendments are consistent with the GMA. 10. The goals and policies of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan were considered and the propcised amendtncnts are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 11. The proposed zoning designations are consistent with the current use of the properties. I 12. Findings were made and factors were considered to ensure compliance with approval criteria contained in Section 17.80.140 H. (Comprehensive Plan amendments and area-wide rezones) of the Spokane Valley 11�unicipal Code (SVMG�. 13. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and text amendments will not adversely affect the public's general healtii, saf�ty, and welfare. ection 3. Pro rt. The properties subject to this Ordinance are described in Attachment "A." Section . �Vlap Amend.ments. Pursuant to RCW 35A.63.073, the City of Spokane Valley Zoning Map as adopted through Ordinance No. 07-015, is hereby amended as set forth in Attachment "A." The Zoning map amendments are generally described as follows: Ordinance 09-009 Zoning Map Changes Page 3 of 6 1 � �Vian Amendm ents File No. CPA-01-09: Application/Description of Proposal: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment to change the designation on parcels 45242.9032, 45242.9033, 45242.9035, 45242.9036, 45242.9050, 45242.9051, 45242.9056 and 45242.905? from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential. Appllcant: Ben Goodmansen, Whipple Consulting Engiaeers; 2528 North Sullivan Road; Spokane Valley, WA 99216 . Amendment Location: Parcels 45242.9032, 45242.9033, 45242.9035, 45242:9036, 45242.9050, 45242.9051, 45242.9056 and 45242.9057; located on the south side of 4�' Avenue batween Sullivan Road and Conklin Road; further located in the south half of the northwest quarter of Section 24, Township 25 I North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokan� County, Washington. Council Decision: Change Parcels 45242.9033, 45242.9035, 45242.9036, 45242.9050, 45242.9051, 45242.9056 and 45242.9D57 to Multi-family Hig6 Densit�• �tesideatial District (MF-2). Change Parcel 45242.9032 to Multi-family Medium Density Residential District (NIF'-1). , � � � .• File No. CPA ��' � . � ApplicationlDescription of Proposal: City initiated site specific Comprahensive Plan map amendmant on parcels 45242.1002 and 45242.1006 from High Density Resideritial (HDR) to Neighborhood Commercial (NC). ,- Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E,'Spra�ue Ave, Ste 106; Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendment Loeation: The northeast corne'r'.of 4`' Avc;nue and Sullivan Road, parcels 45242.1002 and 45242.1006, addrassed as 315 and 325 South Sullivan Road; further located in the NW'/4 of the NW'/4 of Section 24, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, , Spokane County, �Vashington. Counsel Decision: Change to ; Neighborhood �Commercial, (NC) File No. CPA-03-09: ' Application/Description of Proposal: � Comprehensive Plan Map amendment from Office (0) to Commnnity Commercial (CC) �on six'(� parcels composing approximately 3.5 acres of land. Applieant: City of Spokane Valley, �11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 4mendment Location: The proposal is located betw�een Mullan Road and Argonne Raad from the north side�of IIoone Avenue to the south side of Sinto Avenue; specifically located in the SE'/4 of Section 17, Tow 25 North, Range `44, East �Villamette Meridian, Spokane Valley, Washington Council Decisioa: Change to Community Commercial (C) ; File No. CPA-04=09 Application/Description of Proposal: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment to change from Community Commer'cial (CC) to Low Density Residential (LDR) on approximatety .47 acres of land. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendment Location: �� The proposal is located on St Charles Road, approximately 780 feet north of Sprague Avenue on the east side of Progress Road; specifically located in the SE %4 of Se�tion 14, Tovmship 25 North, Range 44 Fast Willamette Meridian, Spokane Valley, Washington. Council Decisioa: Change to Single-family Residential Urbaa District (R-4) File No. CPA-OS-09: I I Ordinance 09-009 Zoning Map Changes Page 4 of 6 Application/Descr�ption of Proposal: A City initiated text amendment to Chapter 2— Land Use. The amendment also evaluates all properties designated public/quasi-public and proposes an appropriate laad use designation and zone based on the predominant land use surrounding the property. Applicant: City of Spokans Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendment Location: Text amendments to Chapter 2— Land Use will have city-wide unplications. Amendments to Public/Quasi-Public properties are located throughout the city. Couacil Decision: Adopt Teit amendments to Chapter 2— Land Use; eliminate the Commnnity Facility (C� zoni.ng designation and change to zoning designations consistent wfth surrounding designations. .,-,; � � Sectioa 5. 2.o.ning Map/Official Controls. Pursuant to RCW '35A.63.100, for the purpose of regulating the use of land and to implement and gi��e affect to the Comprehensive Plan the City hereby amends the Official Zoning Map of the � City as � set forth in Attachment �� ,�. ., . ection 6. Adoption of Other Laws. To, .the e�rtent that any provisian of the SVMC, or any other law, iule or regulation referenced ,�.n .the attached _ Zoning Map(s) is .necessary or convenient to establish the validity, enforceabilifiy or interpretation of the Zoning Map(s), then such provision of the SVMC, or other law, rule or regulation �is hereby adopted by reference. ection 7. Map - Copies on .� File-Administrative Action. The Zoning Map is maintained in the offce of the City Clerk as well as the City Depa,rtment of Community Development. The City Manager or designee, follo�ving ado�,ption of this Ordinance, is authorized to modify the Zoning Map in a mainner consistent w�ith �us Ordinance. Sectioa 8. Liabili �. The express intent of the City of Spokane Valley is that the responsibility for compliance with �'the provisions, of this ordinance shall rest with the permit applicant and their agents. This ordinance and its��rovisions are adopted with the express intent to protect the health, safety, an� `��elf�re of t��e general public and are not intended to protect any particular class of individuals or organizations. �` � Section 9. Severabilifiv. If any, section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance shall' be � held to be invalid or tuiconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ord.inance. � Section 10. ,,Effective Date. Thi.s Qrdinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days af�er publication of �this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the o�cial newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley.as pr�vided by law. PASSED by the City Council this day of May 2009 � Mayor, Richard Munson ' ATTEST: Ordinance 09-009 Zoning Map Changes Page 5 of 6 i City Clerk, Christine Bainbrid�e Approved As To Form: Office of the City Attorney ,,�-�� 1 = - :I. Date of Publication: = :, , t�C� 1 . ' ` � ' '��5 Effective Date: _ ` ` �! ,, i �,.: �� : _:, . i ' ' 1„ �.+.� xr � ��.�; � . �-1 `��'��`� _ - ._� � � . t♦ ` ` -/,� �.� . i. . �i. ' "' i �1 ; � i i. . '•�-�� t�. �.� ..i:; �!��'*-! f!�;,`•:�_ •, ��rl,!-r- . r' .� , 1 �'•� N1 � '�j,�;��;;� 1 ''��,� ,� �j?�:�''';,`if' ,.' ti. ��:r � � t . ,� .T!'•iY•. . 1�>-i�✓.,,. �- �t _�. .��ft.?f.j . . � , - - . � ~L �' � `'y ; ��:' I _ .' � f � i �� -:�::�-��•? �'� . � - �t •�•' ' �7� ,��'� � . . � ! , �'� � '. . i'' .-j . . .! ' �;}�� a!I` .� ti Y� ' . .. F . i � 1 ��! ��n � � 1 { , . �y'�..�t� -. . . . i'' � �:v�7•�;h�" -: ' W� Y �;4 •- .� . ; ` . �l� :I. . 1�` \ ; l�' , . v��' : �'�> +� _ �. ,4� . . , �. ��, � h '.�.;� - . ' �' 1'I � � :; •., �) � , �'; I ��' : . ,�.� 'Ij,. ,��;�: :' � _ ''. , . '� �, ` � y` , � Ordinance 09-009 Zaning Map Changes Page 6 of 6 ac men � • • .� �= � _;. ' ; � � ::: ++�Li3e3� . ....,:.''�,.... ` ' • �� '- - ". i��i�-►iE:'i�sin Z�� ►i� i4• .- � .. . ,,,• � � . �� - � ...��. ,.. �� ' � . I - . � - O � �, ,� ,. �/� r , I I 1 � ■�1� % - .� � __ _ - ,. �� — • a � �,.L� �?� • � /�� ,'��/ I,� � ,,,, � / / � / / � / • � / / / �� _ ,' ■ _ / � %/ � � � / � / �� I � � / / / _ ,. , f / / . � �� . � � / � i � // � . - � � % � // � � ,. � / ♦ ■■ � � / / � / / � � � / / / 111 ■ � � � / � /� i / / . ■■ � // ,i , . ,� , i r��► � � � � . �� ■ � ♦ . ♦ � ♦ � ♦♦ � .. ♦♦ � _ -- ► • r _ � .� ♦ ... „. , .� � � � � � � . � � �� - � � �..�� _ � , _ _ _ �. � .� i. i�. �. �� .i � . i �. � � �, � � i �i� � � _ _ '• 1 I' � :il' �� 'I I 'I 'i � 'I 'I � � �� • 'I '�� 'I � ' �-•� •� �� 1 '�� t� �� 1• • �� •► 1•�� 'I �• t'��'� �� 1' � II' �:. ��: �� ' � ' �• � •� � i �� t � � � • .� - - - - -- - - -� -- - - .- ____ - - - -- - -- . • � f, ��[�1�_ �. _._. � .i•. . . _.' . a'f: s( __ �.� ��+��G! - �y " s � • • • ♦' _ -- � 1A .1 .I7i•�is• �a.�•i. �uj�;�• ►� � ••r 1�� ♦♦ •�...: .�. � �r•�y � - � � ` -�i_��i��=i�� ' ` :�s�' J .. ••� r... �.�.� ..`j., �1��..:.�...� �:,._.3:-...;. . I� �� '. � �� - 1'Y �� - ►rs: ' T! � \ :: . •:.' ' . i _ •�� •�••1.�+4�!••�� •�.i. ..�..r�� "-�+��,1.�; �e � � " � � ��f.�(•�_Y►�f. � �'s �s i�I�'i�� .iL�� ` K=y��}1C��.. �N!'�Ii ��1�'5�:1�/ ��M i��i.. . '.�`i — - '___..—___ . ._�—__ _'_� — -_ ,-_ __— .__— — . — �� % - - - , ��1 . , � . . . i _ �.� - �� ■ _ � � . � � � � _- . � r �� , / � �� !/ � � ��1� • � : ■ ■ % �� . . � � � % �_ � i � �/ �. � . � , � � 1 � � � � ■�� . � . - � � � �i � � . �� ;� � � � 1 _ , . ■■ . �r��r� � , � �■ - ■■ / i �� ,. ,� � � �- _ �= � � i - �� ■. ■ ■ � ., , � �■ ■�� . � � � �� . ■��r � � _ � � � �� .., ,,,�. ,. , , .i�i ' �i ��:� �:; �i: ii � i �i :�� i i 1 ' � ; � � • � � i � � i � � i i � i � 1 • • i � n • i 1 • � � � i • i � — - - — — - - � • � .� � �J�f� • � _ �� !•\�.M��Y _ � '•••••_-. _ .'-�..•. _ •.,... • :':•- : • .. � '� :�•�..-•� ,- ... . .... . ....� ' . .... ..�� . .. ' .,� • I��_ �! '�' ' •_ S{��y - ��r• _ �'� _ • i�i1�r\ � I I ;�l♦ ��Y�� •1i• ♦i• � •• lfa� ��H� . .�_— •��til �.� fi ��• •�a .�w •�• .�• :� / �� j ��' �/i • ' /// /// � � / //� // � / � !// �/� , � /� /. //� //i /i �/� //� . // - //� //i !/� //� . �� /// //i /� !/� //� / //� ///� / !/� // . � / � /�� //� � i// // . � ,/�� //j�ji �� ;�///��///�� ': , , % i%j��%%%�j�i � � � / , // /i i � i// // i ' ' ;/� j �/%�f j/%i �///////%�_ :��%�1-'r� �%•�� !�jj%//��/ %��///%��j�i � � �� / %�%��i �• , // � % %%�jji�%�j�i ��i�,i�/�/ %�' � � � !��%��%i �� %�//�/��///� �� /J/�j�j//� i �� i,�/ r,,,�// // , iii i� // i/�j/,�i��i/� %� ��j//�/�///i % % :,., ; � / � � � / . � � / � , � � � / � � % , � % % � / / / � / / / % / , / / � / � / � / / ___ _ / _____��_ _� , / � +. _,_� /�� / � � i � i i % � i %% � i %/ / � %� % /� /� �ra�t .. �/ � � // / / // / — �� - - � � — —--, —— ' • I I' ..� �: ��' i' �t� �'�'� ' �: i �:�. � i' �i t � � . � . - - � � 1 � i � � � � � � � � i � � � �� 1• • ��•� 1.� .� - - � � � .� � — — — -�- - � ----- --, / / � . � � _� �:: . � : ::.-... .. :: ... :: � � � - .��_�:. .�-- . ...: --- � :, .. . . .. .., . � -- � .. .. _ . . • .. . .. . . . .. .._ . .. . .... .. . . . . .. . . . . . . ... .:� .._ -.::_-. - ;, -__ :. .....:.:::.':: .._ ={ � ..:. . � .. :: :-::':.� .:-. - :: :� - � ..� - .. ... - :.. . - .. . .. ' I I ' . , . .: ':� e..,....r- + ... .: ...::.:: �:..::-. '� � ::: .. . . .: : : � : : � - . ::�� - � ...�-=�: � : ::. � :... . :: ` � � - .'..: ..�::��:� = _. ::. =;� � �� .:. .. .. ...... _ _.=-:::= . .. � f ;� :: :;::;; ��.:....;:: �.. �� ::;: •: :..:�• , . :;�:::::::.. �=:::.:• � � 2 � r � . } • i • L '. �►.: •�J •....'.F.si� � — w! � '.7J�f•.�?"+�"��r��aTt. - �• l..r.•1.•.�s:T :'� •Nifi«aa _ ..�•...•�.r��..�..�.: .�.��. y�� ` •.. R �I I��.��.�. ��e��ii:::•��' \ •��_..� � ��a�i:r'+il.�ils��.i7��'.�i��i��'��:-��• .,�is�171. \ . • � � •• • ` �..`,M1i:ia s�� - . ' r • i •• �� s� •�• ��• �. r.�• . .. . . •Lj�� •t• •�. •�' _ . .. ... ' , ' _• • • . . .� . . ' . . .......• •.... .� .' „ • .... . • 'N �...� . ... • - � . ' . • " . _ .• � . • �,�.��.. • � � . " ' . .. •� �i� .�. ��.�'.. �� - "'•:' .._ " " - •�• •�.....�.�...-.� •�ti " •i�i.��...��• •. .��...-... •M�. �� !. .'I:�i\':,�•� •�..�.'�:�i�'��- •��.... .�.....•..'.... �� •.�• • ��•�� - ��r..� •.♦ •�i• •��l��lV�� a��i• S1 .�I• •�:�'a��.��1��i •1��• � •♦ •::�1��1'�i� �� ril��11.1p�i��• •�� •1• :��• �:� • '�• • •��1�1�i►��iilNlY��i��/• � • "��• •�• ��• •r��Iii��l�. •' •�1��.. ��i✓��'�� , •1� ♦�• ♦� •H��• •��ilf1� •��• Y• . •��-��• •�� i�� I1�� '�• YI. •�� , . �� •��:i'�I'.�� •��'�i�� .� � . _ . . . ,. •• • ....., - .. .. ...-: •t •�• •�• �� •�• •�• •��. •��• �.*� •��• r � •�t •��• •N�• • }�'1�• ��^ ..�� •V� - - �� .}�i:��• •es...:�::k: . •.�'. y► � sf.t��lf�ii.. ?.: V , Sr'lyVff - } 'y U � . .�a• ..'e►*s�.��. �1 ..a�..�: •.4!1.L.: 1i�...v..rwK �I y� ��`'� ►H ,._�Y . _ �� : f �� •� � •ei• . �iN2��:�sa .�i.;.:i.•�..►: �� U N •��i• • 4 ' 1 ' � �r��jr�M� J�' �. • : .� �y�'� j iM • 'sy��'F��1 'H��w7�� I•.:t._ � ♦'1 �' .. •�...�•.�: �• • (� �Y� 7 i��N ♦� ..-.�...��w��l/j�� \\ �lS�NI'l��i-+�►. • Y��fj � [) .sr' _��• f�� .• R�7►Y►i�7f�• • •�� tr��• �. •M�• �. �� ♦��}! � �� ♦� ��! � �/ % +��ilyl��,a- 1 y�� [a . •f ♦• �I •��r�i�� .1� •\'1�� \ ► ��:� ' �yy"�.�� •iA�� ' � 'yl �Y" �~ i��y� �� !e� • � • - . 1! ��r:i •��r s�i s� � EV •�wi ��t� ini� �� •a�►� f . •��r •i .� � .....:•.��.1'�r. • �.� . .�. . ��1�� 1 1 � rf}Yµr l.f. �R� •Y ! l , � 1 '��il►•I�i�1).� �• 1 �.fi��'r� � �..u• ►.�• 1�_ I►'l \ . ♦f�J��. � ;Y.�I� .�i♦ ��'�'�}� � �• ��f ��,e�r ! ♦ •T - •��►1itr M� f� �. �t�Y�« ��I, ��w'�l� ••� . •�..r •��.• •Y • •k �• ♦�il.��iri ► �T��ri.��•A��l�}��►• �?��♦� !�. . f s'��M�� Z !� .• v ! � - s.....��is�i ` .. ..:*Z��r �1�► ��.li�i7�+` , '::'.- •"�• �a_►l '�.:• ... 1�.. ... • . •:.....,..'..,:.'•`- ♦a��iM s �y� •�II��• •�• � � i..•�r►i�i��-r�7a..��.T ». • ��i�♦ •1r".s' �..��i:.ii:.��. �:� .� : : ` .a. ••. - ��r��• • � ��•• •�.�. •� •�� . . :�. •a. . ... " ..e.. '�• .i..... .�. .��.. " _' - ��s��':•��.....• • i.��• a��.� •��...�.::�� t�� i��ri•�� ' t• .�•�i..•�� . :��' . �..�.�.•,t�l'•aY� _ •:'��'.R}.ii:�• i� �� •�• :�.i. _ �i. fi • ��.�Nr�r�:�..? �M t: •�a��h�, �r i�c• �� •...i. "" "...�� ..�r...� ! ♦�r� •' ��• !�. - ,�i.�' " �►�. }�•li�:�fr..�s'� •..'. .�•• ' .•\r�• •' •�� - Y , ►�• �• �1•.�:�� •lr��• •�� \ \ �` . � ...__. - -._ —_ —_ _.__ __ .' . _ ' -- , � '' �' 1 1• 1' 1� 1 11 1 ' 1' 1 � � t 11 ' 1 1' �' 1' 1 1 1 1 1 : 1 ' 1 1 1 �� I' I'' 1 I I' 1 11 1 �• ��i ii � 1• • ��ii'i 1��• t�• - CITY OF SP�KANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 12, 2009 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business � new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading proposed ordinance 09-010 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A.390 and RCW 35A.63.220. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: The Uniform Development Code was adopted in September of 2007 and was effective October 28'", 2007. Following the adoption of the code, a number of items were discovered which were incorrect, impractical, or omitted. These amendments are corrections of some of these items. The Spokane Valley Planning Commission held a study session on these items on February 26�', 2009 and a Public Hearing on March 12�', 2009. ANALYSIS: Below is a summary of changes being recommended by the Planning Commission: Chapter 17.50.010-Adding a requirement that all requests for Adrninistrative Interpretations be submitted in writing. Chapter 17.80.150- Correct the Distribution of Notice requirements to include the applicant, newspaper, city hall, and the main branch of the library Table 17.80-1- Alphabetize table and add Alterations �nci Planned Residential Devefopments. Table 17.80 the table to make pre meetings Optional for Type II applications with the exception of Short Subdivision and Binding Site Plans and refer to Chapter 21.20.070(60(2) for SEPA noticing requirements. Chapter 19.70.010 a requirement that all parking, maneuvering and outdoor storage areas sha11 be paved. Chapter 19.70.020-Add a requirement that all parking. maneuvering and outdoor storage areas shall be paved. Appendix 19-A-Allow Warehousing in areas zoned Community Commercial with conditions. Chapter 22.50.020-Add a requirement that all parking, maneuvering and loading areas shall be paved and a stipulation that parking not provided on the same site as the use or structure shall not be separated from the use or building by a street designated as an arterial. Chapter 22.50.030-Change directional sign size requirements to be consistent with Table 22.110-1. Table 22.50-7-Remove Hotel/Motel from table Table 22.110-1-Update directionai sign information to be consistent with language in Chapter 22.110.030, and remove copy area requirements for directional signs and name plates. OPTIONS: Proceed as proposed, or as modified; or direct staff further. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Approve ordinance #09-010 BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None. STAFF CONTACT: Christina Janssen — Assistant Planner ATTACHMENTS: (1) Amended Text SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANC� NO. 09-010 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON AMENDING ORDINANCE 07-015 SPOKANE VALLEY NIUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS 17.50.010, 17.80.150, TABLE 17.80-1, TABLE 17.80-2, 19-A, 19.70.010, 19.70.020, 22.50.020, 22.110.030, TABLE 22.50-7 AND TABLE 22.110 ADDING A REQUIREMENT THAT ALL REQUEST FOR ADMINISTRATIVE INTERPRETATIONS BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING, CORRECTII�IG THE NOTICING REQUIREMENTS FOR AMENDMENTS TO THE MIJr1ICIPAL CODE, AMENDING TABLE 17.80-1 TO INCLUDE ALTERATIONS AND PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS AND ALP�3ABETIZE TABLE, AMENDING TABLE 17.80-2 TO MAKE PRE-APPLICATION MEETINGS OPTIONAL FOR TYPE 2 APPLICATIONS AND CORRECT NOTICING REQUIREMENTS FOR SEPA THRESHOLD DETERMINATIONS, ADDING REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL PA►�tKING, l�'IANEWERING, OUTDOOR STOR.AGE AREAS, AND LOADING AREAS BE PAVED IN THE IlvDUSTRIAL AND CO1ViMERCIAL ZONES, ADD ING A REQUIREMENT THAT SEPARATED PARKING FACILITIES NOT BE SEPARATED BY STREETS DESIGNATED AS ARTERIALS, ALLOWING WAREHOUSES TO LOCATE IN THE CO��]MUNITY COMMERCIAL ZONES WITH CONDITIONS, CORRECT INFORMATION RELATEI) TO DIRECTIONAL SIGNS AND NAME PLATES T� BE CONSIS'I'ENT, AND REMOVE PROVISION REQUIRING HOTELS/MOTELS TO HAVE LOADING SPACES AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley adopted the Uniform Development Code (UDC) pursuant to �rdinance 07-015, on the 24th day of September, 2007; and WHEREAS, the UDC became e£fective on 28th day of October, 2007; and WHEREAS, the Spokane Valley Planni.ng Commission held a public hearing on these issues on February 26, 2009 and determ.ined to add a provision requiring all request for Administrative Interpretations to be made in writing, correct the noticing requirements for text amendments to the Municipal Code, amending Table 17.80-1 to include Alterations and Planned Residential Developments and alphabetize table, amend Table 17.80-2 to correct SEPA noticing requirements and make Pre-Application Meetings Optional for Type II Applications, adding a requirement that all parki.ng, maneuverins, outdoor storage areas, and loading areas be paved in the Industrial and Commercial zoncs and that separated parking not be separated by streets designated as Arterials, allowing Warehouses to locate in the Commun.ity Commercial zone w conditions, correct information related to directional signs and name plates for consistency, and remove provision requiruig Hotels/Motels to have loading spaces met the criteria for approving an amendmcnt including being consistent w•ith the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 1 and that it bears a substantial relation to the public health, safety and welfare and protection of the environment. WHEREAS, WHEREAS, after reviewing the Environmental Checklists, the city issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for the proposals, published the DNS in the Valley News Herald, posted the DNS at City Ha11 and at the main branch of the library, and mailed the DNS to all aff'ected public agencies; and WHEREAS, it has been deternuned that the proposed amendments are consistent with the applicable goals and policies of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Washington state law, the city notified the Washington State Department of Community Trade and Economic Development of the proposed changes on January 23, 2�09 NOW THEREF4RE, THE CITY COUNCIL SPECIFICALLY ORDAINS AS SET FORTH BELOW: Section One: Chapters 17, 19, and 22 shall be amended as follows: 17.50.01 U Interpretation of development code. Any person may request a formal interpretation of a provision of the development code, zoning map, arterial road map, prior conditions of approval, or prior administrative I interpretations. A11 re�uests for furmal interpretations shall he made in «Titin�J. The i.nterpretation shall be made by the community development director (hereafter referred to as "the director"). The community development department (hereafter referred to as "the department") shall maintain a file of all written interpretations. (Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007). 17.80.15U "1'ype IV applicaiiuns — T'ext amendments to the uniform development code. A. Iniiiation. Text amendments tu this code may be initiateci by any of the follo«ing: 1. Property owner(s) or their representatives; 2. Any citizen, agency, neighborhood association, or other party; or 3. The department, planning commission, or city Gouncil. B. Applications. Applications shall be made on forms provided by the City. C. Application Submittal. 1. After submittal of an applicant-initiated application, the application shall be subject to a pre-application conference, counter-complete, and fully complete determination pursuant to SVMC 17.80.080, 17.80.090, and 17.80.100. 2. After submittal, the application shall be placed on the next available planning commission agenda. D. Notice of Public Hearing. Amendments io this code require a public bearing before the planaing commission. 1. Conteats of Notice. A notice of public hearing shall including the following: 2 a. The citation, if aay, of the provision tbat would be changed by the proposal along with a brief description of tbat provision; b. A statement of how the proposal would change the affected provision; c. The date, time, and place of the public hearing; d. A statement of the availability of the of�icial file; and e. A statement of the right of any person to submit written comments to the planning commission and to appear at the public hearing of the planning commission to give oral comments on the proposal. 2. Distribution ofNotice. The departinent shall distribute the notice t�� tl�� a��licant. nc�� s�,�iver. ritv h��ll and th� �Zlain hranch ot� tl�e libr�r` .� . .�{�} E. Planning Commission Recommendation — Procedure. Following the public hearing, the planning commission shall consider the proposal and sball prepare and forward a reeommendation to the city cut�ncil. Tlie planning comnussion sh�ll take one of the following actions: 1. If the planning commission determines tliat the proposal should be adopt�d, it may, by a majority vote, recommend that the city council adopt the proposal. The planning commission may make modifications to any proposal prior to recommendin� the proposal to city eouncil for adoption. If the modification is substantial, the planninb commission rnust eanduct a public hearing on the modified proposal; 2. If the plan.n.ing commission detemaines that the proposal should not be adopted, it may, by a majority vote, recommend that the city council not adopt the proposal; or 3. If the planning commission is unable to take either of the actions specified in subsectioas (E)(1) or (2) of this section, the proposal will be sent to city council with t��e notation that the planning comnaission makes no recommendarion. F. Approval Criteria. The City may approve amendments to this code if it iinds that: 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan; and 2. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safety, «�elfare, and protection of the environment. G. City Council Action. Within 60 days of receipt of the planning commission's findings and recommendations, the city council shall consider the findings and recommendations of the commission cancerning the application and may hold a public hearing pursuant to council rules. The department shall distribute notice of the counc i l's public hearing pursuant tc� SVMC 17.�l1.120(B). By a majurit�� vc�te, the city council shall : 1. Approve the application; 2. Disapprove the application; 3. Modify the applieation. If modilication is suhstantial, the council must cither conduct a public hearing on the modified proposal; or 4. Refer the proposal back to the planning cocllmission for furt��r cunsi��ratioii. H. Transmittal to the State of Washington. At least 60 days prior to final action bein� taken by the city council, the Washington State Departinent of Community, Trade and Economic Development (CTED) shall be provided with a copy of the amendments in order to initiate the 60-day comment period. No latcr than 10 days after adoption of the , � proposal, a copy of the fina] decision shall be forwarded to CTED. (Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007). Table 17.80-2 — Permit Type and Land Use Application Pre- Counter- Fully Notice of Notice of Final Application application COmplete complete application public decision Type conference determination determination 17.80.110 hearing and 17.80.080 17.80.090 17.80.100 17.80.120 notice 17.80.130 I O X X N/A N/A X � 'll **�� X X X N/A X I I I X X X X X X X Required O Optional N/A Not Applicable *Does not apply to SEPA threshold determinations. Refer to section 21.20.070(B1(21 for noticing requirements *'Except for Short Subdivisions and Bindina Site Plans which reouire a Pre-AoQlication meetinq Table 17.80-1 — Permit Type and Land Use Application Type Land Use aad Development Application SVMC Cross Reference Type I Accessory dwelling units 19.40.100 Administrative determinations by community development director, Multiple public works director, or building ofFicial Administrative exception 19.144 Administrative interpretation 17.50.010 Boundary line adjustments and eliminations 20.80 �IIIIC�lI7 ��rmits nut sub,�ect to SLP,•1 ? 1.?0.0�(�-9�:4�: �-49 � Flc��dplain devel��m� 21.30 � Gradin� �ermits 2:�.�0 � Home occupation permit 19.4U.14U � Recc�rd of Sur��e�� t�� E�t�iE�li�h I.�ts ��iti�in .i 13indin� Site Plan ?0.60.0�0 R.ight-of-way permits 22.130.060 Shoreline permit exemption (dock permit) 21.50 Site plan review 19.130 Temporary use permit 19.160 4 Time extensions for preliminary subdivision, short subdivision or 20.30.060 binding site plan I �z-�-.-�8 I =i :i � �� e Altzratiuns-Preliminar�� and final subdivision�. short sub�livisic�El�. ??.ti(� bindinQ site plans ' BindinQ site�lan-Preliminarv and final ' 20.50�8:59 BindinL site plan-Cl�an�� of cc�ilditions ?0.�0�?-�-�9 Type �� II SEPA threshold determination 21.20.060 ( Sh�►reline sub�tailtial de�•elopn�ent pemlit 21.50�-8:-0�8 S1.�ort slibdi�Fisi�n-Prclimin�r�• and tinal 22.30. 22.4 .. ._ . I Preliminarv shurt subciivision �lll�lil� Slt� p��iI'1 -Cha�i�e ut�conditions 22.�0 Wireless communication facilities 22.120 Conditional use permits 19.150 ( Planned Residential Deti•elopments 19.54?8:39 � Plat Vacation 20.7�.0?0 ( TYpe Preliminarv subdi��ision-Chan«� of conditians��ee ?0.>4�-9:�� III . Subdi�,•isions-Preliminarv ?�. �0 ?8�8 ee��i� � Vari ance es3 19.17 .. Zoning map amendments (site-specific rezones) 19.30.030 Annual Comprehensive Plan amendments (text and/or map) 17.80.144 Type N Area-wide zoning map amend.ments 17.80.140 Development code text amendments 17.80.150 � 19.70.010 I-1, Light Industrial district. A. The Light Industrial designation is a planned industrial arca with specia) e�i�phasis and attention given to aesthetics, landscaping and intemal and community compatibility. Typical uses would include technology and other low-impact industries. Light industri al areas may also include of�iee and commercial uses as ancillary uses ��7thin an overall plan for industrial development. B. Supplemental Re�ulati�ns. ; 1. The outdoor storage provisions contained in SVMC 19.6U.U60(B) shall apply to the I-1 district. 2. Mobile food vendors shall be located on/within designated areas which do not interfere with parking or internal circulation with permission of the property owner, health certificate and permit. 3. Setbacks. a. Front and flanking street yard setbacks shall be 20 feet; and b. Side and rear yard setbacks of 35 feet are required only adjacent to residential zoning districts. 4. The following structures may be erected above the height limits of this code provided: (A) the structure is accessory to or part of a building which is a permitted use in the zone; (B) the structure complies with the height limits in the Airport Overlay zone; and (C) no residential use of the structure shall occur above the height limits prescribed in the zone. a. Penthouses or roof structures for the housing of elevators, stairways, tanks, vcntilating fans, or similar equipment to operate and maintain a building. b. Fire or parapet walls, skylights, flagpoles, chimneys, church steeples, belfries, wireless masts, and similar structures. c. Structures such as silos, feed mills, batch plants, and fixed cranes which are used in a manufacturing process which utilizes vertical processing and storage of materials. d. Water stand pip�s and tanks. (Ord. 08-017 § 1, 2008; Ord. 0?-015 5 4, 2007). �. All parkin 111311�Llt't „ 11�j c�t1T� �t�r�i�� ar�.;s �hall he �?�?��ed. Exemptions: a. Par�in�T �u��l 5tura��c; arc:a� r�►utiil�l�� u�c��i bv cl�at�� nd oth�r h�a�-� equipment as approved bv th�e Plannin� Director. f�. The PlanninQ Director mav ��aive portions of these requirements unc�� recommendation by the Spokane ReEional Clean Air A�encv or the Spokane Vallev De��elopment Enoineerine Division «�hen it can h�� dzmonstrated that the proposed surfacin�. such as �rass oavers or other technolo�v will not adverselv at��ct �ir qualitv �vater qualit` �r th�_ inte�rih� �f the narki �re��. 19.70.020 I-2, Heavy Industrial district� A. Heavy Industrial designated property is characterized by intense industrial activities which include manufacturing, processing, fabrication, assembly, freight handling and similar operations. Heavy industry may have significant noise, odor or aesthetic unpacts. B. Supplemental Regulations. 1. I-2 allows any use permitted in the I-1 zoning district, except as specifically provided in Appendix 19-A. 2. Mobile food vendors shall be located on/within designated areas which do not interfere with parki.ng or intemal circulation with permission of the property owner, health certificate and permit. 6 3. The following structures may be erected above the height limits of this code provided: (A) the structure is accessory to or part of a building which is a permitted use in the zone; (B) the structure complies with the height limits in the Airport Qverlay zone; and (C) no residential use of the structure shall occur above the height lunits prescribed in the zone. a Penthouses or roof structures for the housing of elevators, sta.irway�s, tanks, ventilating fans, or sunilar equipment to operate and maintain a building. b. Fire or parapet walls, skylights, fla�les, cl�imneys, church steeples, belfries, wireless masts, and sim.ilar structures. e. Structures such as silos, feed mills, batch plants, and fixed cranes w�vch are used in a manufacturing process which utilizes vertical processing and storage of materials. d. V�'ater stand pipes and tank�. (C�rd. �8-O l 7� l.?�08; nrd. 07-� 1 S��, ?007). -+. r111 ��ll�k�l: Exemptions : a. P�. �quipment as approved bv the Plannin� Director The PlanninQ Director mav waivz portions of th�: ` �;. .:::,_ :..:. r�commendation by the Spokane Re�ional Clean Air AQency or t: �pokane Vallev Development Eneineering Division when it can i �izmonstrated thai the pronosed surfacing , such as gra.ss pavers o� t�chnolo�,y will not adversel�� ffect ��r �t��lit��. w�ater aualitv_ar the ;,,t��►�-ih� nf 1h� n�ar�: irR �r:-� - - � Chapter 19.12c) PERMITTED AND ACCESSOR`�( US�S Section� ��'.�.. E. � �T`'l�(,i�. i �.�.1 �'U.0 1 U (_J�►��i al. Uses are classified u5i,z� tl�� uU? Nurt�i t�ii�ri��ul 1►ic�u�try l.l��ilic;�tiuii Sy��tcnl (NAICS) published by the U.S. Census Bureau based on category and subcategory. Subcategories i.nelude all uses not identified separately by specific number. Uses ma�� '�: permitted, be subject to conditions, or require conditional or temporary ,1 �`��;� Pi �, �!�; :� � shown in Appendix 19-A, the schedule of permitted and accessc�r� ��;. Schedule of Mi Cor Cit Ga Neighb Com Regio Com I- I-2 Referen M M NA NA p��mitted Uses ze rido y rde � or600d munit n�l munit l He ce - F- F- IC ICS fic 1 2 3 4 1 Z S# S d r Ce a � Comm y Com y Li sv Conditi :lppe ndix 19-A Us Mix nte Off ercial Cam merci Facili gh v ons � e ed r ice mercj al ty t In Ce Use al In d nte d r 71 711 Adult S S Chapter entertainment I 9. SO estabiishment SVMC 45 453 Adult retail use S S Chapter establishmcnt 19.80 SVMC 31 311 Agricultural P P processing plant, warehouse 33 336 Aircraft P 411 manufacturing 48 481 Airstrip, private P P 219 62 621 Ambulance P P P P P P P P 91 service 54 S41 Animal P S P P P SVMC 94 clinic/veterinary 19.60.0 40(B}(1 ) 31 311 Animal P 613 proctssing facility S S S S S S 11 112 Animal raising S S F..xcludi and/or kecping ng NAICS 1122, Swine. SVMC 19.40.1 SQ. 81 812 Animal shelter P P 91 31 311 Animal P 61 slaughtering nnd processing 45 453 Antique storc P P P P P P 92 44 448 AppareVtailor P P I' P P P P P shop 44 443 Appliance P P P P A A Only if 111 sales/service manufa ctured/ assembl cd on F�� s. 33 335 Appliances P P 22 manufacturing 45 453 Art P P P P P P P P 92 gallery/studio g 32 324 Asphalt P 12 pl$nUmanufactur ing 33 333 Assembly — P heavy 33 334 Assembly — light P P P P P P P P P 62 623 Assisted living P P P P 312 farility 45 4S3 Auction house P P P 3 4i 453 Auction yard P P 3 (excluding livestock) 11 115 Auction yard, P 2 livestock 33 336 Autamobile P 1 assembly plant 92 922 Automobilc P P impound yard 44 441 Automobile/light P P P P truck salcs and scrvic� 48 485 Automobifeltaoci P P P P P P P P 3 rental 81 811 Automobile/truc S P P P Enclose 121 k1RV/motorcycl d e painting, structur repair, body and e only. fender works SVMC 19.6Q.0 SO(B}(3 )• 44 441 Automotive P P P P P P 3 parts, accessories and tires 31 311 Bakery products P P 81 manufacturing 44 445 Bakery, retail P P Y S S P P P A A Floor 291 area limited to 10% of GLFA not to exceed 1,000 � 52 522 [3ank, P P P P P P P P P P 11 savings/loan and other financial ins�tituiions 81 812 Barber/beauty P P P A P P P P P 1 shop 9 33 335 Battery P P 9l rcbuildinglmanu facturing P P P P P P 72 721 Bed and P P P 191 breakfast I1 I12 Bcekccping, P 9l cornrncrciaJ S S S 11 112 Beeke�ping, SVMC 91 hobby 19.40.1 �o�� 45 451 Bicycle P P P P P P P P P 1 saleslservice 33 336 Boat building, P P 611 rcpair and maintcnance 44 441 Boat P P 222 saleslscrvicc 45 451 Book/stationcry P P P P P P P P 2 store 31 312 Bottiing plant P P 1 71 713 Bowling alley P P P P P 95 72 722 Brewery, micro P P P P P P P P P 31 312 Brewery, winery P P P P P P P 1 andJor distillery 33 339 Bcoom P P 994 manufacturing 4� 444 Building supply P P P l and home improvement 44 �45 Candy and P P P P P P P P 292 confectionery 71 713 Carnival, circus T T T T T T T T 99 32 32 I Carpenter shop P P P P 9 56 56l Carpet and rug P P 7�0 cleaning plants 81 811 Carwash P P S P P P P SVMC 192 I 9.6(?.0 4aB� 71 713 Casino P P P P P 2 45 4S4 Catalog and mail P P P p P 113 orderhouscs P P 72 722 Catering services P P P P P P P 32 P P P P 81 812 Cemetery and P 2 crematorics 45 451 Ceramics shap P P P P P P P 10 112 32 325 Chcmical P manufacturing P P P P P P 81 813 Church, templc, P P P P P P P P mosque, synagoguc and parsonage 44 448 Clothcs, rctail P P P P P 1 salcs 49 493 Cold P P 12 storagdfood locker 61 611 College or P P P P P P P P 3 university S1 51? Communication P P P P P P P P service/sales 33 334 Communicarions P P P P 2 equipment manufacturing P P P P P P 92 921 Community P P P P P P P P P P P — facilities 922 P P P 81 8l3 Community hall, P P P P P P P P 4 club, lodge or re�reational facility P P P 62 623 Community P 2 residcntial facility (6 or less residents) P P P 62 623 Community P 2 residential facility (breater than 6 residents, no moro than 25) 56 561 Composting P 73 storagelproces�si ng. commcrcial 54 S41 Computcr P P P P P P P P P P S 1 services 23 237 Contractor's P P 3 — yard 238 P P P 62 623 Convalescent P P hom�, nursing home 44 445 Convenience P P A A P P P P P 12 store 33 339 Cosmetic and P P miscellaneous manufacturing P P P P P P 62 623 Day carc, adult P P P A P P P A A A 3 11 P P 62 624 Day care, child P P A A P A A A 410 (13 children or more) P P P P P P 62 624 Day care, child P P P A A P P P A A A 410 (12 children or fewcr) 45 452 DepartmenUvari P P P P P 1 ety store 44 44b Drug store P P P A P P P P A P I1 81 8l2 Dry cicaners P P P A P P P P 3 81 S 12 Dry cleaning, P P 332 laundry, linen supply plant, commercial 32 32l Dry kiln I' 111 4 S S S 81 814 Dwelling, SVMC accessory 19.40.1 xpartmcnts 00 81 814 Dwelling. S S S SVMC caretaker's I 9.60.0 residence 60(l3x 1 ) P P 72 721 Dwelling, P P P P P 3 congrcgate P P P P 81 814 Dwelling, duple�c P P P 81 814 Dwell'wg, P P P S S SVMC multifamily 1 .fi0.0 20(B) P P P P P P 81 814 nwelling, S S SVMC singlc-f'amily 1 y.60.0 ?p(g) P P P 81 814 Dwclling, P P P P townhouse 33 334 ElectricaVelectro P P P P P P P - nic/comp�ter 335 component and systcm manufacturing/a sscmbly 32 322 Emery cloth and P P 226 sandpaper manufacturing 71 713 EntertainmenUre P P P P P creation facilities, indoor 71 713 Gntcrtainment/re P P P P P P 9 creation facilities, outda�r �� 53 532 Equipmcnt rcntal P P P P P 3 shop 81 811 Equipmcnt sales, P P P P P 3 repair, and maintenance 72 722 Espresso/latte P P P P P P P P P P P 2 relail sctvicc R R R R 92 92 Essential public R R R R R R R Chapter facilitics 19.90 SVMC A A 71 713 Exercisc P P P A A P P P P A A 94 facility/gyrn/athl etic club 32 325 E.Yplosive P 92 manufacturing 49 493 Explosivc P P I90 storage P P P P P P 81 814 Family home, P P P P P adult P P P P P P 81 814 Family home, P P P P child 44 441 Farm machinery P P P 222 sales and repair 11 112 Fecd tot P 112 31 311 Feed/cereaUflour P P 211 mill 32 325 Fertilizer P 3 manufacturing 81 812 Fitm developing P P P A A P P P 92 44 443 Filtdcamera P P P A A P P P 13 sales/servicc �t5 453 Florist shop P P P A A P P P P 1 31 311 Food product P manufacturing/st orage 44 445 Food sales, P P P S P P SVMC 21 specialty/butcher 19.60.0 shop/meat 44(B}(3 macket/specialty ) foods 48 4$4 Freight P P forwarding 44 447 Fueling station P P P A P P P P 81 812 Funeral home P P P 21 33 337 Furniture P P __ manufacturing 31 315 Garment P P 13 manufacturing 45 453 Gift shop P P P A A P P P A P P P P P P 71 7 l3 Golf course P P P P 91 C C 71 713 Golf driving P C P P P 9l range/training ccnier 49 493 Grain elevaior P P 13 4d 444 Greenhouse, P P P P P P 22 nurscry, garden ceater, retail 11 111 Greenhousc, S S P P SVMC 4 nursery, I9.GOA cotnmercial 50(Bx3 ) 44 445 Groccry store P P P S P P SVMC 1 ! 9.l,�.0 �0(B){3 ) 44 444 Hardware store P P P S P P SVMC 13 19.60.0 40(Bx3 ) 56 562 Hazardous waste S S SVMC 21 I trcatment and � 1.40.0 stotage 60 48 4$1 Hciiport P P 2 48 481 Helistop C C C C C P 2 45 451 Hobby shop P P P A P P P 12 44 442 E Iome P E' P P furnishings, retail salc 62 622 Hospital P P P P P P 1 R R R R R 62 622 Hospital, R R R R R R R R R 210 psychiatric and substancc abusc 62 622 Hospital, P P P P P P P A A 310 spcxialty 72 721 HoteUmotel P P P P P P P P l 31 312 Ice plant P P 113 32 325 [nk P 91 manufacturing 45 453 Jewelry, clock, P P P A P P P P P 22 musical inswment 14 assembly, salcslservict 81 812 Kennel, indoor S S S S P P Scx 91 kennel, doggie z�ning day carc facility districts for conditio ns. 54 541 Laboraiorics P P P 38 (Bio Safety t.evel 2) 54 S4l Laboraiories P P P 38 (Bio Saftty Leve13) 54 541 Laboratories P P 38 (Bio Safety L.evel 4) 62 621 Laboraiories, P P P P P P S 1 medical and diagnostic 44 4-04 Landscapc P P P P 19 maierials sales A A 8l 812 Laundromal P P A P P P P 3l0 44 445 Liquor storc P P P A A P P 3 56 561 Locksmith P P P A A P P P 622 32 321 l.umlx'rmill, P 1 sawmill, shingle mill, plywood mill 33 332 Machinc shop P P P 71 33 333 Machinc/machin P P ery manufacturing 23 236 Manufactured P P I 1 S home fabrication S S S S S 81 814 Msnafactured SVMC home park 19.40. I 30 45 4S3 Manufactured P P P 93 home salts 32 327 Manufacturing, P P nonmetallic metal products 45 453 Market, outdoor T T T T T T 998 62 621 Massage therapy P P P P P P P P 498 31 311 MeaVfish P P 6 - rannin�, cuttinQ. 1� 31 I curing and 7 smoking 33 339 Medica] and P P P 1 laboratory instrumentlappar atus manufacturing 42 423 Medical, dcntal, P P P A P 45 and hospit.al equipmcnt supply/sales 62 621 MedicaUdenta! P P P P P P P P P 4 clinic 62 621 MedicaVdental P P P P P P P P P U�1CC 33 332 Metal fahrication P P 33 332 Metal plating P 33 332 MetFil proc�scs, P hot Mineral product P manufacturing, nonmetallic 21 212 Mining P 72 722 Mobile food S S S S S S S S S Set 330 vendors zoning districts for conditio ns. T T 23 236 Model home 115 units 71 712 Museum P P P P P P P P ll 45 451 Music store A P P A P P P 14 A A 56 561 Office P P P P P P P P P P P 45 4S3 Office and P P P A P P P P 21 computer supplies 99 999 Off-road P P recrcatioaal vehicle use 11 111 Orchard, tree P P 3 farming, commercial 32 322 Paperlpulp milis P 11 48 485 Park-and-ridc P P P P P P P P P 9 facility 45 522 Paw�nshop P P P P 298 81 R 12 Pcrsonal scrvice P P P P P P P P 16 45 453 Pet shop P P P A P P P 91 32 324 Petrolc�m and P 11 coal products manufacturing S4 541 Photographic P P P A A P P P 92 studio 32 32S Plastic and P 11 rubber products manufacturing 32 326 Alastic injection P 199 molding, thcrmoset 32 326 Plastic injection P P P Y P P 199 molding, thermoplastic 32 326 Plastic injection P 199 solvent molding 49 491 Post office, P P P P P P P P P P P posta.l ccntcr 22 22 t Power pla.nt P (excluding public utility facilities) 56 561 Print shop P P P A P P P P P 43 32 323 Printing, P P reprogaphics, bookbinding services, coaimercial 48 488 Public pay P P P P P P 49 parking garagc!!ot P P P P P P 22 22l Public utility P P P P P P P P P P P distribution facility S S 5 S S S 23 237 Public utility S S S S S S S S S S S SVMC transmission 19.40.0 facility 3Q ? 1 713 Racecourse P P P P 99 71 711 Racxtrack P P 212 51 S 15 RadiolTV P P P P P P 1 broadcasting studio 48 482 Railroad yard, P 1 repair shap and roundhouse 72 721 Recreational C S SVMC _ 2 vehicle 19.60.0 park/campgroun 60 17 d 44 441 Recreational P P 21 vehicle sales and service P P P P P P S 1 S 15 Repeater facility P P P P P P P 11 72 722 Restaurant, P P P P P P 2 drive-in 72 722 Rcstaurant, P P A C P P P P 2 drive-through 72 722 Restaurant, full P P P A P P P P P P serrrice 45 452 Retail sales P P P A P P P A A Limitcd — to items 453 manufa ctured on the premise s. 71 713 Riding stable P P 99 33 331 Rolling mill P 22 31 314 Rope P P 991 manufacturing 32 325 Rubber P 212 reclamntion, manufsicturinglfa brication P P P P P P 6l 611 Schools, public P P P P P P P 1 and private, K through 12 P 61 611 Schools, P P P P P P P P P P 4 professional, vocational and trade schools Sho�f�room P P P P P P 45 453 Secondhsnd P P P P P P 3 store, consignment sales 33 339 Sign P P 95 manufacturing/rc pair 33 339 Sign painting P P P P P 95 shop 32 325 Soap and P 61 cicaning compound manufacturing Sb 562 Solid waste S S S SVMC 92 recyclingJtransfe �9.60.0 r site 60(B) 18 61 611 Specialized P P P P S P P P Adaptiv 6 training/learning c reuse schools or of studios cxisting structur �.s only. No �� on allowod P P 49 493 Storage, sclf- P P P P 19 service facility 49 493 Storage, general S S S S P Sea — outdaors zoning districts for conditio ns. Tank stora.ge, S S S S 5 S S S S SVMC LPG above 21.40.0 ground 60 21 213 Tank storage, S S SVMC 1 l2 critical material l 4 0 abovc ground �0 21 213 Tank storage, S S S S SVMC 112 critical matcrial l.40. bclow ground �0 31 316 Tanning, curing P 1 of hides and skins 72 722 Tavcrn P P P P P P 4 Taxidermy P P S S S S S S S 1 S 17 Tclecommunicat S S S C S S S C S S Chapter 2 ion wireless 22.120 antenna array SVMC C C S 1 S 17 Tciccommunicai S S S C S S S C� S S Chapter 2 ion wireless 22.120 support towec SVMC 31 314 Textile P P 11 manufacturing 71 711 Theater, indoor P P P P P P P 71 711 Theater, outdoor P P P 56 562 Tire, rccap and P 92 retread manufacturing S S S S S S S 1 517 Tower, ham S S S C S S C S S SVMC 9 operator 19.40.1 10(A) 22 221 Tower, wind C S S S C S S SVMC 119 turbine su�port 19•40• 1 � �) 48 485 Transit center P P P P P P P P P 19 1 C 72 721 I'ransitional 3 housing 44 441 Truck sales, P P 222 rental, repair and maintenance 44 4�5 Truck st�p P P 447 81 811 Upholstery shop P P P P P 42 � 49 493 Warehousing A S S A P P Adaptiv 11 e rcuse of earisting st�vctur ts. No expansi on allowcd 32 321 Wood product P P manufacturing 56 562 Wrccking, C S SVMC 92 recycling, jwik 19.60.0 and salvage 60(B) yards P Permitted Use A Accessory Only R Rcgionul Siting T Temporary Permit S Conditions Apply C Coaditional L1sr Pcrmit (Ord. 08-026 § 1, 2008; Ord. 08-002 § 1, 2008; Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007). 22.50.020 Vehicle parking. A. Rules for Computing Number uf Parl:in� Spaces — Show in Table 2?.�0-2. The number of required off-street parking spaces shall be based on the following: 1. "Floor area" shall mean the gross square feet of the specific use. 2. Where fraetional spaees result, the parking spaces required shall be constructed to the nearest whole number. 3. Uses not specified in Table 22.50-2 shall provide parking based on a use of similar nature; 4. New Construction. Prior to occupancy of a new structure within any zoning district, off-street vehicle pazki.ng shall be provided in accordance with Table 22.50-2. 5. Expansion of Existing Use. Prior to occupancy of an expanded (enlarged) floor area, off-street vehicle parking shall be provided in accordance with Table 22.50-2 based on the expanded square footage. 20 6. Chaage of Use. If the mi.nimum number of vehicle parking spaces required for the change of use added to the e�cisting on-site parki.ng supply falls short of the minimum number of vehicle parking spaces required for the project as a whole, the applicant shall provide additional spaces to bring the total supply up to the minimum required. 7. In the case of multiple-use occupancies, other than shopping centers, in a building or on a lot, the total requirement for off-street parlting shall be the sum of the requirements for the various uses computed separately. 8. Tandem spaces shall not count as required parkin�. I 9. :�ll p ��rkin�,� maneu�•erin� an�� lc��i�iin�T ��rea; �1�:�]l i� - _' -- B. Location of parking spaces, except as follows: 1. For nonresidential uses, required off-street parking shall be located in the same zone or in a zone which allows the use for which the parking is required. 2. All parking spaces requimd herein shall be located on the same �arcel t�vith the building or use served unless: a. The parking is located on a contiguous parcel ur parcels under the samc ownership and title notice is filed identifying the parking serving the other building or use; or b. If the required parking for a building or use is located on a parcel(s) other than described in subsection (B)(1) of this section, the owner of the parcel upon which the proposed parking is located executes a joint parking agreement in a form acceptable to the city attomey, stating that the parcel is devoted in whole or in part to required parking for the use of a parcel or parcels under separate ownership. The agreement shal l be binding on both properties and shall be recorded with the Spokane County auditor's o�ce and filed with the Spokane Valley department of community development; c. Where shared parking is proposed, the minimwn number of parking spaces for all shared uses shown on Table 22.50-2 shall be calculated. When these totals are applied to the percentages shown on Table 22.50-1, the minimum number of parking spaces reyuired is the largest sum of the individual totals for each time period. d. Par�l�� ili�t ��r��vid ��n the Sc1I11� Slt� �s the use or � �,-,,� �, �, �� ,? I , i i ` � , , ,.. i � . '-_ � � __ _ _. � - 22.110.030 Permit required. A. Other than for those uses listed in subsection B of this section, a sign permit is required for all allowed permanent signs, temporary signs, and billboards. B. Permits are not required for on-premises o�icial signs; seasonal decorations; merchandise displays; point-of-purchase advertising displays; national and state flags; flags of a political subdivision; notice signs, pennants and streamers without advertising copy; symbolic flags of nonprofit institutions dedicated to public service; legal notices required by law; barber poles; historic site designations; commemorative monuments/plaques; gravestones; advertising copy affixed to phone booths; donation and recycli.ng containers; lettering or symbols applied directly onto or flush-mounted magnetically to a motor vehicle operating i.n the normal course of business; political signs supporting political issues, caudidates or ballot measures; replacement of copy on signs ( otherwise permitted; name plates with less than four€�re square feet of copy area; directional signs w less than four square feet of copy area; and murals containin� no copy. 21 C. Pemut applications shall include a site plan that provides the following information: 1. The location of the af�ected lot, building(s) and sign(s); 2. The scale of the site plan; 3. A scaled drawing of the proposed sign or sign revision, including size, height, copy, structural footing details, method of attachment and illumination; 4. The location of all existing signs on the site including size and hei�ht; 5. For signs subject to spacing regulations, the location of neighboring signs on adjacent properties; 6. Approved sign plan, if applicable; and 7. Tax parcel number where proposed sign will be located. (Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007). 22.110.0�U Number, general regutations for permitted permancnt sigos. A. Permitted permanent signs shall comply with the requirements of Table 22.110-1. No more than the maximum numbers of either freestanding pole signs or monument si��l structures are allowed per parcel. Table 22.110-1— Location, Hci ht and Copy Area Rc uirements Maaimum Copy COpy Side Land Use � On1° g Number Hei t COPy � �a Y�'d Permit Additional District �r � Area (ft2)/I,ot �� Setback Required Provisions Parcel � (ft2} Frontage � ��•� < 100 ft. rontage > 100 ft. Attached Wall Signs Institutional Residential * * * �/ n/a �/a y *25% of Zones wall area Single Business Residential 1 n/a 60 n/a n/a n/a Y Zones All Mixed Use and *25% of Nonresidential Nonresidential * �a * n/a n/a n/a Y wall area Zones per building Freestanding Signs Subdivision/Area *Per arterial Name/Multifamily A11 Zones 1* 10 32 n/a n/a n/a Y street Complex/lnstitutional frontage Single Business Neighborhood 1 20 100 n/a n/a S Y Business (NC) - Multi-business Zones * 22 Complex Single Business Mixed Use 1* 30 n/a 100 200 5 Y and Multi-business Nonresidential omplex Zones (except 1* 40 250 n/a n/a 5 Y NC) Nonresidential No 1 SQ 250 n/a n/a 5 Y *Adjacent Freeway* Zones to I-90 only Monument Signs Subdivision/Area Name/Multifamily A11 Zones 1 10 32 n!a n/a n/a Y Complex/Institutional '�Per arterial street Single Business Neighborhood 1* 7 75 n/a n/a 5 Y frontage Multi-business Business (NC) Complex �nes 2* 7 90 n/a n/a 5 Y Single Business AIl Mixed 2* 7 90 n/a n/a 5 Y Use and '`Per street Multi Nonresidential2* � 150 n/a n/a 5 y frontage Complex Z�nes Other Signs Direc;ti�nal A11 Zones nla n/a - � i�. a� n/a n/a 1� Name F�lates All Zones 1 n/a 4 n!� n/a n/a Table 22.50-7 — Loading Spaces Required Use/Gross Squarc Fcct Required Loading Spaces Industrial, manufacturing wholesale, warehouse, similar uses 10,000 —�0,000 squar� feet 1 space 40,001 — 60,000 square feet 2 spaces 60,001 —100,000 square feet 3 spaces Over 100,000 squan feet l space f'or eac}15U,000 square feet or part thereof I T.7.�4 -.1 I..�.�.40� *' � Gill�s 7 20,000 — 60,000 square feet 1 spaGe 60,001-100,000 square feet 2 spaces O�}�r 100,000 squar� feet 1 space for each 50,0�0 squarc; feet or part tl�ereof �ospitals, convsilescentlnursing homes and similar institutions 10,000 —�0,000 square feet 1 space �� _ ., 40,000 — 100,000 square feet 2 spaces Over 100,000 square feet 1 space for each 50,000 square feet or part thereof Department stores, retail and other com.mercial uses 10,000 — 20,000 square feet 1 space 20,001 — 50,000 square feet 2 spaces 50,001 —100,000 square feet 3 spaces Over 100,000 square feet 1 space for each 50,000 square feet or part thereof Seetion Two: Severability. If any section, sentence, clause ur phrases of this Urdinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of compet�nt jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validit}� or constitutionality of any other sectio�, clause or phrase of this Ordinance. Seerion Three: TCfective Date. "I�his ordinance shall be in full force and ci�ect tiv� (5) days after the publicaLion of the Ordinance, or a summary thereof, occurs in the official newspaper of the City as provided by law. Passed b�� the City Council this ciay of , 2008. Mayor, Richard Munson ATTEST: City Clerk, Christine Bauibridge Approved as to F'orn�: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Expiration Date: _ 24 22.50.020 Vehicle parking. A. Rules for Computing Number of Parking Spaces — Shown in Table 22.50-2. The number of required off-street parking spaces shall be based on the followin�: 1. "Floor area" shall mean the gross square feet of the specific use. 2. Where fractional spaces result, the parking spaces required shall be constructed to the nearest whole number. 3. Uses �lot specified ir� Tahle 2'.�0-? shall pro�ricle plrkirl�� based �n a u�� 1� similar nature; 4. New Construction. I'rior to occupanc}� of a new structure �vitivn an}' zonin�; district, off-street vehicle parking shall be provided in accordance with Table 22.50-2. 5. Expansion of Existing Use. Prior to occupancy of an expanded (enlargedl floor area, off-street vehicle parking shall he pro��ided in accorciance � Table ??.50-2 basc�j on the expanded square footage. 6. Change of Use. If the minimuin number uf vehicle p�u space5 requir�d 1or t�ie change of use added to the existing on-site parking supply falls short of the minimum number of vehicle parking spaces required for the project as a whole, the applicant shall provide additional spaces to bring the total supply up to the minimum requirecl. 7. In the case of multiple-use occupancies, other than shopping centei�s lI1 �1 building or on a lot, the total requirement for off-street parking shall be the sum of tilc requirements for the various uses computed separately. 8. Tandem spaces shall not count as required parking. 9. All parking, maneuvering and loading areas shall be paved. B. Location of parking spaces, except as follows: I. For nonresidential uses, required off-street parking shall be located in the same zone or in a zone which allows the use for which the parking is required. 2. All parking spaces required herein shall be lacated on the same parcel with the builciing or use served unless: a. The parking is located on a contiguous parcel or parcels under the same ownership and title noUce is fited identifying the parking serving the other building or use; or b. If the required parking for a building or use is located on a parcel(s) otl�� r than described in subsection (B)(1) of this sectian, the owner of the parcel upon which (he proposed parking is located executes a joint parl:ing agreement in a form acceptable to the city attorney, stating that the parcel is devoted in whole or in part to required parking for the use of a parcel or parcels under separate ownership. The agreement shall be binding on both properties and shall be recorded with the Spokane Counfiy auditor's office and filed with the Spokane Valley department of community development; c. Where shared parlcing is proposed, the minimum number of parking spaces for all shared uses shown on Table 22.50-2 shall be calculated. When these totals are applied to the percentages shown on Table 22.50-1, the minimum number of parking spaces required is the largest sum of the individual totals for each time period. d. Parking not provided on the same site as the use or structure shall not be sepazated from the use or building by a street designated as an arterial. 22.110.030 Permit rcquired. A. Other than for those uses listed in subsection B of ilus section, a sign permit is required for all allowed permanent signs, temporary signs, and billboards. B. Permits are not required for on-premises official signs; seasonal decorations; merchandise displays; point-of-purchase advertisiag displays; national and state flags; flags of a political subdivision; notice signs, pennants and streamers without advertising copy; symbolic flags of nonprofit institutions dedicated to public service; legal notices required by law; barber poles; historic site designations; commemorative monuments/plaques; gravestones; advertising copy affixed to phone booths; donation and recycling contai.ners; lettering or symbols applied directly onto or flush-mounted magnetically to a motor vehicle operating in the normal course of business; political signs supporting political issues, candidates or ballot measures; replacement of copy on signs otherwise permitted; name plates with less than four square feet of copy area; directional signs with less than four square feet of copy area; and murals containing no copy. C. Permit applications shall include a site plan that provides the following information: 1. The location of the affected lot, building(s) and sign(s); 2. The scale of the site plan; 3. A scaled drawing of the proposed sign or sign revision, including size, height, c��py, structural footing details, method of attachment and illumination; 4. The location of all existing signs on the site including size and height; 5. For signs subject to spacing regulations, the location of neighhoring signs on adjacent properties; 6. Approved sign plan, if applicable; and 7. Tax parcel number where proposed sign ��ill be located. (Orci. 07-01 S 5 4, 2007}. Table 17.80-2 — Permit Type and Land Use Application Pre- Counter- Fully Notice of Notice of Final Application application complete complete application public decision Type conference determination determination 17.80.110 hearing and 17.80.080 17.80.090 17.80.100 17.80.120 notice 17.80.130 I O X X N/A N/A X *II **O X X X N/A X I I I X X X X X X X Required O Optional N/A Not Applicable *Does not apply to SEPA threshold determinations. Refer to section 21.20.070(B)(2) for noticing requirements. **Except for Short Subdivisions and Binding Site Plans which require a Pre-Apptication meeting (Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007). Chapter 19.120 PERMITTED AND ACCESSORY USES Sections: 19.120.010 General. 19.120.010 General. Uses are class�ed using the 2002 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) published by the U.S. Census Bureau based on category and subcategory. Subcategories include all uses not ident�ed separately by specific number. Uses may be permitted, be subject to conditions, or requir�e conditional or temporary use permits as shown in Appendix 19-A, the schedule of permitted and accessory uses. Mlx Corri Schedule of Gar Neighbo Comm Region I-1 I-2 Referenc R R R R M M� NAIC Pemtltted Uses � dor City den Offi rhood unity a� Comm Lig Hea e - F- F- CS Use Mtxe Cen unity S S Offi ce Commer Comm Comm ht vy Conditlo 1 2 3 4 1 2# Appendix 19 Cen d ter ce cial ercial ercial Facility �nd Ind ns ber Use 71 711 Adult er�tertainment S S Chapter establishmerrt 19.80 SVMC 45 453 Adult retail use S S Chapter establishment '19.80 SVMC 31 311 Agricultural P P processing plant, warehouse 33 3364 Aircraft P 11 manufacturing 48 4812 Airstrip, private P P 19 62 6219 Ambulance service P P P P P P P P 1 54 5419 Animal P S P P P SVMC 4 clinicJveterinary 19.60.040 (B)(1) 31 3116 Animal processing P 13 facility S S S S S S 11 112 Animal raising S S Excluding andlor keeping NAICS � 1122, Swine. SVMC 19.40.150 81 8129 Animal shelter P P 1 31 3116 Animal slaughtering P 1 and processing 45 4539 Antique store P P P P P P 2 44 448 AppareVtailor shop P P P P P P P P 44 4431 Appliance P P P P A A Only if 11 saleslservice manufact ured/ assemble d on premises. 33 3352 Appliances P P 2 manufacturing 45 4539 Art gallery/studio P P P P P P F P 2 32 3241 Asphait P 2 plant/manufacturing 33 333 Assembly — heavy P 33 334 Assembly — light P P P P P P P P P 62 6233 Assisted living P P P P 12 facility 45 4533 Auction house P P P 45 4533 Auction yard P P (excluding livestock) 11 1152 Auction yard, P I ivestock 33 3361 Automobile P assembly plarit 92 922 Automobile P P impound yard 44 441 Automobilellight P P P P truck sales and service 48 4853 Automob+le/taxi P P P P P P P P rental 81 8111 Automobile/trucklR S P P P Enclosed 21 V/motorcycle �� pair�ting, repair, only. body and fender SVMC �� 19.60.050 (B)(3). 44 4413 Automotive parts, P P P P P P accessories and tires 31 3118 Bakery products P P 1 manufacturing 44 4452 Bakery, retail P P P S S P P P A A Floor area 91 limited to 10°� of GLFA not to exceed 1,000 sf. 52 5221 Bank, savingslloan P P P P P P P P P P 1 and other financial institutions 81 8121 BarbeNbeauty shop P P P A P P P P P 33 3359 Battery P P 1 rebuilding/manufact uring P P P P P P 72 7211 Bed and breakfast P P P 91 11 1129 Beekeeping, P 1 commercial S S S 11 1129 Beekeeping, hobby SVMC � 19.40.150 (C) 45 4511 Bicycle P P P P P P P P I' sales/service 33 336fi Boat building, repair P P 11 and maintenance 44 4412 Boat sales/service P P 22 45 4512 Book/stationery P P P P P P P P store 31 3121 Bottling plant P P 71 7139 Bowling alley P P P P P 5 72 722 Brewery, micro P P P P P P P P P 31 3121 Brew�ery, winery P P P P P P P andlor distillery 33 3399 Broom P P 94 manufacturing 44 4441 Building supply and P P P home improvement 44 4452 Candy and P P P P P P P P 92 confectionery 71 7139 Camival, circus T T T T T T T T 9 32 3219 Carpenter shop P P P P 56 5617 Carpet and rug P P 40 cleaning p�ants 81 8111 Carwash P P S P P P P SVMC 92 19.60.040 �B) 71 7132 Casino P P P P P 45 4541 Catalog and mail P P P P P 13 orcler houses p P 72 7223 Catering services P P P P P P P 2 p p p p 81 8122 Cemetery and P crematories 45 4511 Ceramics shop P P P P P P P 12 32 325 Chemical P manufacturing P P P P P P 81 813 Church, temple� P P P P P P P P mosque, synagogue and parsonage 44 4481 Clothes, retaii sates P P P P P 49 4931 Cold storage/food P P 2 locker 61 6113 College or P P P P P P P P university 51 517 Communication P P P P P P P P service/sales 33 3342 Communications P P P P equipment manufacturing P P P P P P 92 921 Community facilifies P P P P P P P P P P P 922 P P P 81 8134 Community hall, P P P P P P P P club, lodge or recreational facility P P P 62 6232 Community P residentiai faality (6 or less residents) P P P 62 6232 Community P residential facility (greater than 6 residents, no more than 25) 56 5617 Composting P 3 storage/processing, commeraal 54 5415 Computer servioes P P P P P P P P P P 1 23 2373 Cor�tractor's yard P P 238 P P P 62 623 Convalescent P P home, nursing home 44 4451 Convenience store P P A A P P P P P 2 33 339 Cosmetic and P P miscellaneous manufacturing P P P P P P 62 6233 Day care, adult P P P A P P P A A A C C C C P P 62 6244 Day care, child (13 P P A A P A A A 10 children or more) P P P P P P 62 6244 Day care, child (12 P P P A A P P P A A A 10 children or fewer) 45 4521 DepartmenVvariety P P P P P store 4.4 4461 Drug store P P P A P P P P A P 1 81 8123 Dry cteaners P P P A P P P P 81 8123 Dry cleaning, P P 32 laundry, linen supply plant, commercial 32 3211 Dry kiln P 114 S S S 81 814 Dwelling, accessory SVMC apartments 19.40.100 81 814 Dwelling, S S S SVMC caretake�'s 19.60.060 residence � � P P 72 7213 Dwelling, P P P P P congregate P P P P 81 814 Dwelling, duplex P P P 81 814 Dwelling, P P P S S SVMC multifamity 19.60.020 (B) P P P P P P 81 814 Dwelling, single- S S SVMC family 19.60. 20 (B) P P P 81 814 Dwelling, P P P P townhouse 33 334 ElectricaVelectronic/ P P P P P P P — computer 335 component and system manufacturing/asse mbly 32 3222 Emery cloth and P P 26 sandpaper manufacturing 71 713 EntertainmenUnecre P P P P P ation facilides, indoor 71 7139 EntertainmenUrecre P P P P P P ation facilities, outdoor 53 5323 Equipment rental P P P P P shop 81 8113 Equipment sales, P P P P P repair, and maintenance 72 7222 Espresso/iatte retaii P P P P P P P P P P P service R R R R R R 92 92 Essential public R R R R R R R Chapter facilities 19.90 SVMC A A 71 7139 Exencise P P P A A P P P P A A 4 facilitylgym/athletic club 32 3259 Explosive P 2 manufacturing 49 4931 Explosive storage P P 90 P P P P P P 81 814 Family home, adutt P P P P P p p p p p P 81 814 Family home, child P P P P 44 4412 Farm machinery P P P 22 sales and repair 11 1121 Feed Iot P 12 31 3112 Feed/cereal/flour P P 11 mill 32 3253 Fertilizer P manufacturing 81 8129 Film developing P P P A A P P P 2 44 4431 Film/camera P P P A A P P P 3 sales/service 45 4531 Florist shop P P P A A P P P P 31 311 Food product P manufacturing/stora ge 44 4452 Food sales, P P P S P P SVMC 1 specialty/butcher 19.60.040 shop/meat �g�� market/specialty foods 48 484 Freight forwarding P P 44 447 Fueling station P P P A P P P P 81 8122 Funeral home P P P 1 33 337 Fumiture P P manufacturing 31 315 Garment P P manufacturing 45 453 Gift shop P P P A A P P P A P P P P P P 71 7139 Golf course P P P P 1 C C C C C C 71 7139 Golt driving P C P P P 1 range/training center 49 4931 Grain elevator P P 3 44 4442 Greenhouse, P P P P P P 2 nursery, garden center, retaii 11 1114 Greenhouse, S S P P SVMC nursery, 19.60.0 0 commercial (B)( 44 4451 Grocery store P P P S P P 9 60.040 (B)(3) 44 4441 Hardware store P P P S P P SVMC g 19.60.040 (B)(3} 56 5622 Hazardous waste S S SVMC 11 treatment and 21.40. 0 storage 48 4812 Heliport P P 48 4812 Helistop C C C C C P 45 4511 Hobby shop P P P A P P P 2 44 442 Home fumishings, P P P P retail sale 62 6221 Hospital P P P P P P R R R R R R 62 6222 Hospital, psychiafic R R R R R R R R R 10 and substance abuse 62 6223 Hospital, specialty P P P P P P P A A 10 72 7211 HoteUmotel P P P P P P P P 31 3121 Ice plant P P 13 32 3259 Ink manufacturing P 1 45 4532 Jewelry, clock, P P P A P P P P P 2 musical instrument assembly, sales/service 81 8129 Kennel, indoor S S S S P P See 1 kennel, doggie day zoning care facility districts for condifions 54 5413 Laboratories (Bio P P P 8 Safety Level 2) 54 5413 Laboratories (Bio P P P 8 Safety Level 3) 54 5413 Laboratories (Bio P P 8 Safety Level 4) 62 6215 Laboratories, P P P P P P 1 medical and diagnostic 44 4441 Landscape P P P P 9 materials sales A A A 81 8123 Laundromat P P A P P P P 10 44 4453 Liquor store P P P A A P P 56 56161ocksmith P P P A A P P P 22 32 3211 Lumbermill, P sawmill, shingle mill, plywood mill 33 3327 Machine shap P P P 1 33 333 Machine/machinery P P manufac#uring 23 2361 Manufactured home P P 15 fabrication S S S S S 81 814 Manufactured home SVMC Pa � '19.40.130 45 4539 Manufactured home P P P 3 sales 32 327 Manufacturing, P P nonmetaliic metal products 45 4539 Marlcet, outdoor T T T T T T 98 62 6214 Massage therapy P P P P P P P P 98 31 3116 MeaUfish canning, P P — cutting, curing and 3117 smoking 33 3391 Medical and P P P laboratory instrument/apparatu s manufacturing 42 4234 Medical, derrtal, and P P P A P 5 hospital equipmerrt supply/sales 62 6214 MedicaVdental clinic P P P P P P P P P 62 621 MedicaUdental P P P P P P P P P office 33 332 Metal fabrication P P 33 332 Metal plating P 33 332 Metal processes, P hot Mineral product P manufacturing, nonmetallic 21 212 Mining P 72 7223 Mobile food S S S S S S S S S See 30 vendors zoning districts for conditions T T T T T T 23 2361 Model home units 15 71 7121 Museum P P P P P P P P 1 45 4511 Music store P P P A P P P 4 A A 56 561 Office P P P P P P P P P P P 45 4532 Office and P P P A P P P P 1 computer supplies 99 999 Offi road P P recrea6onal vehicle use 11 1113 Orchard, tree P P fanning, commerc�al 32 3221 Paper/pulp mills P 1 48 4859 Park-and-ride P P P P P P P P P faciliry 45 5222 Pawnshop P P P P 98 81 812 Personal service P P P P P P P P 45 4539 Pet shop P P P A P P P 1 32 3241 Petroleum and coal P 1 products manufacturing 54 5419 Photographic studio P P P A A P P P 2 32 3251 Piastic and rubber P 1 products manufacturing 32 3261 Plastic injection P 99 molding, thermoset 32 3261 Plastic injection P P P P P P 99 molding, themnoplastic 32 3261 Plastic injection P 99 solvent molding 49 491 Post office, postal P P P P P P P P P P F center 22 221 Pawer plant P (excluding public utility facilities) 56 5614 Print shop P P P A P P P P P 3 32 323 Prirrting, P P reprographics, bookbinding services, commercial 48 4884 Public pay parking P P P P P P 9 garage/lot P P P P P P 22 221 Public utilit�r P P P P P P P P P P P disfibution fac�lity S S S S S S 23 237 Public utility S S S S S S S S S S S SVMC transmission facility 19.40.030 71 7139 Racecourse P P P P 9 71 7112 Racetrack P P 12 51 5151 Radio/TV P P P P P P broadcasting studio 48 4821 Railroad yard, P repair shop and roundhouse 72 7212 Recreational C S SVMC vehicle 19. . 0 paric/campground 44 4412 Recreational P P 1 vehicle sales and seroice P P P P P P 51 5151 Repeater facility P P P P P P P 1 72 7222 Restaurant, drive-in P P P P P P 72 7222 Restaurant, drive- P P A C P P P P through 72 722 Restaurartt, full P P P A P P P P P P S@NIC@ 45 452 Retail sales P P P A P P P A A Limited to _ items 453 manufact ured on the premises. 71 7139 Riding stable P P 9 33 3312 Rolling miii P 2 31 3149 Rope P P 91 manufacturing 32 3252 Rubber P 12 reciamation, manufacturinglfabri cation P P P P P P 61 6111 Schools, public and P P P P P P P private, K through 12 P 61 6114 Schools, P P P P P P P P P P professional, vocational and trade schoofs Shawroom P P P P P P 45 4533 Secondhand store, P P P P P P consignment sales 33 3399 Sign P P 5 manufacturing/repai r 33 3399 Sign painting shop P P P P P 5 32 3256 Soap and cleaning P 1 compound manufacturing 56 5629 Solid waste S S S SVMC 2 recycling/transfer 19.60.060 � site �B� 61 6116 Specialized P P P P S P P P Adaptive training/leaming r+euse of schools or studios e�usting structur�s only. No expansion allowed. P P 49 4931 Storage, seff- P P P P 9 service facility 49 493 Storage, general — S S S S P See outdoors zoning districts for conditions Tank storage, LPG S S S S S S S S S SVMC above ground 21 •40.060 21 2131 Tank storage, S S SVMC 12 critical materia! 21.40. above ground 21 2131 Tank storage, S S S S SVMC 12 critical material 21.40.060 below gruund 31 3161 Tanning, curing of P hides and skins 72 7224 Tavem P P P P P P Taxidermy P P S S S S S S 51 5172 Telecommunication S S S C S S S C S S Chapter wireless antenna 22.120 array SVMC C C C C C C 51 5172 Telecommunication S S S C S S S C S S Chapter wireless support �• � 20 tower SVMC 31 3141 Textile P P 1 manufacturing 71 711 Theater, indoor P P P P P P P 71 711 Theater, outdoor P P P 56 5629 Tire, recap and P 2 retread manufacturing S S S S S S 51 5179 Tower, ham S S S C S S C S S SVMC operator 19.40.110 (A) 22 2211 Tower, wind turbine C S S S C S S SVMC 19 support 19.40.110 �B) 48 4851 Transit center P P P P P F P P P C 72 7213 Transiaonal housing 44 4412 Truck sales, rental, P P 22 repair and maintenance 44 445 Truck stop P P 447 81 8114 Upholstery shop P P P P P 2 ( 49 4931 Warehousing A S � A P P Adaptive �� _ ce�c��ed � reuse of existing structures . No expansion allowed. 32 321 Wood product P P manufacturing 56 5629 W�ec�cing, recyciing, C S SVMC 2 junk and salvage 19.60. 0 yards �g� P Permitted Use A Accessory �nly R Regional Siting T Temporary Permit S Conditions Apply C Conditlonal Use Permit (Ord. 08-026 § 1, 2008; Ord. 08-002 § 1, 2008; Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007). Tablc 17.80-1— Permit Type and Land Use Application SVMC Cross Type Land Use and Development Application Reference Accessory dwelling units 19.40.100 Administrative determinations by community development director, Multiple public works director, or building official Administrative exception 19.140 Administrative interpretation 17.50.010 Boundary line adjustments and eliminations 20.80 Building permits aot subject to SEPA 21.20.040 Floodplain development 21.30 Grading permits 24.50 T e I Home occupation pennit 19.40.140 YP Record of Sun%ey to Establish Lots within a Binding Site Plan 20.60.040 Right-of-way permits 22.130.060 Shoreline permit exemption (dock permit) 21.50 Site pl�i review 19.130 Temporary use pernut 19. ] 60 Time extensions for preliminary subdivision, short subdivision or 20.30.060 binding site plan Alterations-Preliminary and final subdivisions, short subdivisions, 22.50 binding site plans Binding site plan — Preliminary and final 24.�0 Binding site plan — Change of conditions 20.50 T y� SEPA threshold determination 21.2�.060 II Shoreline substantia] development permit 21.50 Short subdivision-Preliminary and final 22.30, 22.40 Preliminary short subdivision, binding site plan-Change of conditions 22.30 Wireless communication facilities 22.120 Type Conditional use perrnits 19.150 IlI pl�ed Residential Developments 19.50 Table 22.50-7 — Loading Spaces Required tlse/(:r�ss Square Teet Rcquired Loadin� Spaces Industrial, manufacti�ring whvl�sale, ��rarehouse, similar uses 10,000 — 40,000 square feet l space 40,001 — 60,000 square feet 2 spaces 60,001 — 1 �0,000 square feet 3 spaces Over IOQ,�OC► squar�e feet l space for eacll 50,000 square feet or part thcr�of Restaurant$ 2U,UUU — 60,000 square feet 1 space 60,001 — 100,000 square feet 2 spaces Over 100,000 square fe�t 1 space for each 50,000 square feet or part thereof Hospitals, �•UI1V aicscentlnursin� homes and similar institu�ions 10,000 — 40,OOU square feet 1 space 40,000 — 100,000 square feet 2 spaces O��er 100,00� square feet 1 space fc�r each 50,000 square feet or part thereof Departme stor�s, retail and other commc:rcial uses 10,000 — 20,000 squ�re feet 1 space 20,001 — 50,000 square feet 2 spaces 50,001 — 100,000 square feet 3 spaces Over 100,000 square feet 1 space for each 50,000 squaze feet or part thereof 22.110.040 Number, general regulations for permitted permanent signs. A. Permitted permanent signs shali comply with the requirements of Tabie 22.110-1. No more than the maximum numbers of either freestanding pole signs or monument sign structures are allowed per parcel. Table 22.110-1 — Location, Height and Copy Area Requirements Maximum Side Zoning Copy Copy Yard Permit Additional Land Use Number Copy Area Area District pe � Hfte+ight Area (ftZ)lLot (ft2) /Lot �tback Required Provisions Parcel � � (ft2) Frontage Frontage � � < 100 ft. > 100 ft. Attached Wall Signs Institutional Residential * * * n/a n/a n/a Y *25% of Zones wall area Single Business Residential 1 n/a 60 n/a n/a n/a Y Zones All Mixed Use *25°r6 of Nonresidential and * nla * n/a n/a n/a Y Wall area Nonresidential per Zones building � Freestanding Signs Subdivision/Area NamelMuftifamily All Zones 1" 10 32 n/a n/a n/a Y Complex/lnstitutional Single Business Neighborhood 1 20 100 n/a n/a 5 Y *Per Multi-business Business * arterial Complex (NC) Zones 1 20 n/a 100 n/a 5 Y street Single Business Mixed Use 1' 30 n/a 100 200 5 Y frontage and Multi-business Nonresidential * Complex Zones (except 1 40 250 n/a n/a 5 Y NC) Nonresidential N 1 50 250 n/a n/a 5 Y 'Adjacent Freeway* Zones to I-90 only Monument Signs Subdivision/Area Name/Multifamily All Zones 1 10 32 n/a n/a n/a Y 'Per Complex/Institutional arterial street Single Business Neighborhood 1" 7 75 n/a n/a 5 Y frontage Multi-business Business 2* 7 g0 n/a nla 5 Y ,iplex (NC} Zones I Single Business All Mixed Use 2* 7 90 n/a n/a � 5 Y and "Per street Multi-business Nonresidential 2* 7 150 n/a n/a � y frontage Complex Zones Other Signs Directiona� All Zones n/a Na 4�r'a n/aa n/a n/a N Name Pla�es All Zones 1 n/a 4 n/ab n/a n/a 17.50.010 Interpretation of development code. Any person may request a formal interpretation of a provision of the development code, zoning map, arterial road map, prior conditions of approval, or prior administrative interpretations. All requests for formal interpretations shall be made in writing. The interpretation shall be made by the community development director (hereafter referred to as "the director"). The community development department {hereafter referred to as "ll�e department") shall maintain a file of all wTitten interpretations. (Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007). 17.80.150 Type IV applications — Text amendments to the uniform development code. A. Initiation. Text amendments to this code may be initiated by any of the following: 1. Property owner(s) or theu representatives; 2. Any citizen, agency, neighborhood association, or other party; or 3. The departrnent, planning commission, or city council. B. Applications. Applications shall be made on forms provided by the City. C. Application Submittal. 1. After submittal of an applicant-initiated applicat�on, the application shall be subject to a pre-application conference, counter-eomplete, and fully complete deterrnination pursuant to SVMC 17.80.080, 17.80.090, and 17.80.100. 2. After subil�ittal. tile application shall be �l�ced c�n the ne�t a�ailabl�� plailllic�s� commission agenda. D. Notiee of Public Hearing. Amen�i.meats to tivs cude require a public heann�� b�ii�rc the planning commission. 1. Contents of Notice. A notice of public hearing shall including tlle follc��t in`�: a. The citation, if any, of the provision that «��uld be chan�cd b�� tllc proposal along with a brief description of that provision; b. A statement of how the proposal would chan�.� tli� af�f 'ectt 'l� (11't��'1�1 c. The date, time, and place of the public hearing; d. A statement of the availability of the official file; and e. A statement of the right of any person to submit written conunents to thc planning cornmission and to appear at the 1�1�1�1i� I:t"� �}f� tI1L ��1� 111I1111�' CC�1111111'��li)T1 1�.� give oral comments on the proposal. 2. Distribution of Notice. The department �Ilall c�i�tribut� tl�c noi«� tu 11 applicant, newspaper, city hall and the mai.n branch of the library. E. Planning Commission Recommendation — Procedure. Following t�le public he��r►� the planning commission shall consider the proposal and shall prepare and forwar�i �� recommendation to the city council. The planning commission shall take �ne o1'the follo�ving actions: 1. If the plann.ing commission determines that the proposal should be adopted, it may, by a majority vote, recommend that the city council adopt the proposal. The planning cominission may mal:e modifications to any proposal prior to recommending the proposal to city council for adoption. If the modification is substantial, the planning commission must conduct a public hearing on the modified proposal; 2. If the planning commission determines that the proposal should not be adoptcd, it may, by a majority vote, recommend that the city council not adopt the proposal; or 3. If the plaaning commission is unable to take eit�ler of the actions specified in subsections (E)(1) or (2) of this section, the proposal �vill be sent tc� rit� c�,uncil <<. th� notation that the planaing commission makes no recommendation. F. Approval Criteria. The City may approve amendments to this cucl lI ll t111t�S tjl�lt: 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan; and 2. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to Public �lcaltli, �afet��. welfare, and protection of the environment. 19.70.010 I-1, Light Industrial district. A. The Light Industrial designation is a planned industrial area with special emphasis and attention given to aesthetics, landscaping and internal and community compatibility. 1�ypical uses would include technology and other low-impact industries. Light industrial areas may also include office and commercial uses as ancillary uses within an overall plan for industrial development. B. Supplemental Regulations. 1. The otitdoor stc�rage pro�•isions contai►led in SVMC 19.60.060(B) s11�11 apply to the I-1 district. 2. Mobile food vendurs shall be lucated on/w desi�nated areas ��hich do not interfere with parking or internal circulation with permission of the property o�.vner, health certificate and permit. 3. Setbacks. a. Front and flanl:ing stre��t yard setbacks shall be 20 feet; and b. Side and rear yard setbacks of 35 feet are required only adjacent to residential zoning districts. 4. The following structures may be erected above the height limits of this code provided: (A) the structure is accessory to or part of a building which is a permitted use in the zone; (B) the structure complies with the height limits in the Airport Uverlay zon�; and (C) no residential use of the structure shall occur above the height limits prescribed in the zone. a. Penthouses or roof structures for the housing of elevators, stair�i�ays, tanks. ventilating fans, or similar equipment to operate and maintain a building. b. Fire or pazapet walls, skylights, f7agpoles, chimne��s, churcll stee�les, belfries, wireless masts, and similar structures. c. Structures such as silos, feed nulls, batch plants, and fixeci cranes �� '�11C:11 are used in a manufacttirin� process w�hich utilizes vertical processing and storage of materials. d. V�'at�r stand pipes c1I1Cl L�IIIICS (C)rd. 08-017 � 1, ?OU$; Ord. U7-Ul >� 4, 2007). 5. All parking, maneuverin� and outdoor storage areas shall be paved. Exemptions: a. Parking and storage areas routinely used by cleated and other hea«� equipment as approved by the Planning Director. b. The Planning Director may waive portions of these requirements up�n recommendation by the Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency or the Spokane Valley Development Engineerin� Division when it can be demonstrated that the proposed surfacing, such as grass pavers or othcr technology will not adversely affect air qualit}�, water quality or the integrity of the parking area. 1�9.7[�.��1 I-��, ��ea� Inr�ustr��1 d�s��ic�. A,. ��a°�� t�ial ��ignated pr�vp��y i� �cha��et�ri��d �y inte��e indu�tri�.I ��ti�i�ies r��hiel� i�.cl�d� rr�a�r►►��'�cturing, �rc��+es��tg, fa1b��itrn, assembly, fr�ig�t h�n�lin�, �d �ir�ilax a►p��tion�. I��av�r in�Iustry rn��r l�ve si�nnif��nt n�is� a�.or c�r ��#he�i� impac.t�. 1�. ��g�al�m�nt� �e�u��c�n�. 1. I-� ,��s ��' us� p�rrr�i�ted i� th� I-1 �r�nir�� li�tri�t, +e�c�pt �s �peci�i�c�ll� prn�i�d�al in �pp�ndi�� l��A. 2. 111�1a�il� fa�a� vendt�rs �ha�l �ie l�ca�c� c�nl�rithin c��e�i�n�t�d are�.s whieh d� nat i�terf�r�e with p��.in� +�r int�rr�al circulati�n �ith ��rmi�siar� +��" th.e� prc�p�:t�y ��v�e�,. healt�x c�rti�icate �d permi�. �. T`he f+�[��win� ��ctur�� n7a�r �� er��ted �ibav� the �ieig�t li�.i�� vf this �c�+d� prc��i�eti: �A� th�e ��r'uctur� �� c�es�sor�r ta or �art �a�`a l��alding� �w�ich is � p�r�nitte�d use in tl�e �ane; (B�► �a+� s�ctur� cc�n�pli�s r�rith th�e height I�mits i.� the Airpo�. t�v�r��v ��n�;. �ur►� {�� c� r�sid�r�ti�l us� �f th� structur�e �h�Il ac��r �;have t��e �ei�h� limits prescribed in t�� ne. a. I�e�tha�us�.� ar rv�f struct�r�s f�r the haL�sin� c�f e�e�Tatc�r�, s�ir��rays, tank�, v��tilati�� f�, or �i�i��r eq�i�arr�e�t t� c�p��ra1C� �nd �aint�in a�h�ii��ing, b�. �ir� o� �a��p�t w�11�, �kyli�hts, fl��pa4��, +c�imr�ey}s, c�7urcl� �t��r��, belfries v,�ireless �asts, �r�.� s�i�ni�ar �truct��re�. �. �1��+ct��re� such �s �i��s� �'��d r�ills, b�t�h �lants, �nd fi��d cra�l�s �,v��i��7 ar� u��d in ��ufa�turin� prv��ss whi+�� uti�i��s ��ert��[ prc��sin� and �t�� c�f ��t�r��Is, d. '�at�r st.�n� �ri��e� and t�. �[3rc�, �$_aI7' � 1, "�f��}�: �7rd. �7-�l � � �, ��1�7). �. A�ll �arkin�, m�eu��-� �� utiiuc�r �tar��e �rc�s sh�ll �e �a��eci, ��m�tiot�: a. P�k�n� �r�c� st�rag� a.r�a� �t��t��F us�d b� �reate� ��d �tl��r ��- e�uip�n�nt �s appravcd by t�e Plannin� T�ir�ecf�r. �. T�c �lanni�►� I�ir��t�r �n��° ��aiv� pc�a�� of the�s� r��quic��n�nt� 4��.�'� r�c�mmendati�n by ih� �pakane �e,�f�na1 +��n A�ir ��nc�� r the ��r��ari� '�Ja�I�y �e�elc�pm��.t En��r��er�.g ]]i�Pis��ar� w�i�n it catL be d�m�n�� that t�e p��rpt��c� ��'��i��„ such �� gras� pav�ers or atl��r tecl�olo�,y �vi11 not �d��r�ely� af�'��ct ai�r �ualit}r, wat+�r ��lity oz� tl�e �nt�eg;rit�� f the p�r�i�� r��. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Meeting Date: May 12, 2009 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: consent ❑ old business new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information admin. report X pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed Resolution 09-006, Banking Authority GOVERNING LEGISLATION: An ordinance was passed on April 14, 2009 indicating banks and city personnel authorized to transact city banking business. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: On April 14 the council passed an ordinance that identified banks and City employees/councilors that were authorized to conduct city business with financial institutions. That ordinance indicated a subsequent resolution would provide more specific information. Attached is a more specific resolution. BACKGROUND: During 2003 two ordinances and a resolution were passed with conflicting authorizations for the conduct of city business with our banks. Several staff positions and council positions have turned over since 2003, which limits our ability to clearly indicate who is authorized to conduct city business. The authorization should be to conduct business with our financial institutions and the local government investment pool rather than listing one bank. OPTIONS: 1.) Clarify authorizations for members of the council and staff to conduct city business with financial institutions; 2.} Leave in place remnants of authorizations passed in 2003. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve resolution 09-006. BUDGETlFINANCIAL IMPACTS: There are no out-of-pocket costs to the city in identifying individuals who are authorized to conduct city business with financial institutions. STAFF CONTACT: Finance Director Ken Thompson �� 1�� 1'U�iAI"� �t�Ul�, �'V'A,�I�Il"�TT�TU� ��a�u�r��v r��a. o�-a�a� .� �sv��o� �� e� �� +�� s�+��r� v��r, s�c�� c��r�rr�, �VA�:�H�NNG'TQ�I, �lE�'LA�II'�1G �4��II�� 'il"�,�i�TCIAL I�STIT�TTI�N� 'T'�E CITY I� Ai�TH+�}RL�� '�Cl C(��3�.1CT' �I�`�tCI�"aiL '�`I�AN�A�TI�NS V4�i�"I�, I�E�L�� 1�� 4..� V11�� 1�1i]�Jall� �-l�1�-1 L.1 1 � �r ��1.� � 7' 1' �7��111t1LI ALT'I�fl�`I"1�', �PF,AL�CY �tF�i�LU�I(]Ml� 03-U�tO� :4P�3 Cl'THER N'��TTFI��+ R�I�4,'�'�I) "�'��RE'T�l. �r'�R��4�, th� �ity ��unc�[ �1�.s �r�t�tc�r�ty�, p�ur�uanc tc� �po�an� V�11��= ��utrticip�l C�de ��cti�� .SS.f}1{l, t� d��re b�� r�e��alu��un �F �i1C:�3 �n�n�i�� e�titi�s. t�xe +�i� rt�a� in�r��t pub�ic �nds with, i�clud�r�,� d�pr��iti�g �'unds �n�� acc�►unts, ��r�€in� +che�ks fr�� u�� c��unts, �nd �utf��ri�i�� Func� transf�er� �c� ae�d �r�m ��ch ��c�aunt�; a�nd ��RE1�� the +�i� +C��ncil h�s �t�t�ac�ri�yF, p�trsu�� tc� �pa�Can�: ��ll�y �unECi��I +�c��i� se��i�r� �.55,[I1�}, to dec��r� by r�s�lu�ir�n ti��n�� C�aun�il m�ernher� and +�ity c�f�i��r� ��r�c� n,a� si�,n ci�e�lcs �+i� I�s�half' ��° the �it;y�; a�� :��:A� it ts n�ce�s�ary fror� �im�-tc�-ti.�e �� u�da�� ck� �'��ci�� ir�stitutit�ns t�e �it� is �!utl�ori�d t� d� bu�ir�e�� ►w{ith, �nd t�.� ]C��I�fl�� t�a�:,� �'c��n�il ��.�m��r� a��i �it�� fr��r� ��a �re ��th�ri��c� ta� sr�� n �re��alf c�f the �`��. 1�C1�'�' `I'H��:E�"C��E, �ae it r�st�lv��l �i�- tlr� �it4� C'ot��i�.il af t4�e �'it�� c�f �pok��ne �r'�1Ce��, �pok�ne !��u��y, W�s�i��v�, �s #�n�lc��v�: S�c_t%on �.. Tl�� :ity is ��t��riz�d �� us� B��t�cr 8��;, I��Io�unt��n �'es� Ban� an�1 c�fih�r pu�a�i� d�:��sitarkes as li�t�d a�n tl�e �+'ashi�g#�� '�ab�ic I��p��i� Prc�tection �omn�is�ion 1i�t�i�� f ap�rc,�� l.��n��s, f�r ��alic dep�s��:�, c1��c��, a��d l��ki�� f�i�tc� �:r��sfer-s t� �nd �'��c��r� �c�c��an��. 5ect��n�_�. T��c +C:it�° is �3c�tl��ri��cl tc� i��l��t a�� u�lic mc�ni�.�� •��1� thc Lc��al �rc�v�r�men� In�r��tnic�n� Pc��l �.nd n��l�� il apprapri�t� �rt�ri�#��•ti r��te�l t1��°�:�c�. �e��i�� 3. `�'he f�linv�in� �c�uncil n�em�ber� ar� a��hc�t;i�� t+� tr�ns��rt ��ysi��ss ��ith Bann�r �anl� an� th� ��al �ic�v��rner�t Inv��t�m��t I'ca�l: �,.ic��'d 1Viuns�n �i��a Wil�ite Rc�se L�e�arYps��. Sec�in� �#. T�`he ��llc��vi�� City �f�ce�� re �u�hc�ri�ecl t+� tt�at�s�et �us'sr��ss ��ith B�nner B�nk �nc� t�� c�c�l �r��vernm�r�t Invest�ie�t �'�c�l: I�+�� ThQ�ps�n, F'inas�ee I3ir�e��c�r �ik� Ja�ks�ri, ��uly �ity li��n��r Sect��►n 5. R._��1. T� the ��.t�nt that prev�a�u� ��waci� ifi�ati�r��, r�:�c�luti�n� aa��d ar�ii�a�� are �i�c�nsi�tent a�vi�h t��s� ��t f�rt�� l��rein, io�c�t�t��n� F�e��fu�i�n t�3-��1�, �}iey� �r� r��led. R�solutior� ��RO�U6 Pa�c 1 ��' 2 DKA F7' Section 6. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect upon adoption. Adopted this day of May, 2009. ATI'EST: CIT1' OF SPOKANC VALLE�' Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Richard Munson, Mayor Approved as to form: Office of the Cit}� Attorne}� 12esolution 09-006 Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 12, 2009 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business � new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Bid Award — Sprague Avenue Resurfacing — University to Evergreen Project (#0110) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adopted 2009-2014 Six Year TIP on June 24, 2008, Resolution #08-014; Information Memos on Federal Stimulus Projects at December 16` Meeting and SRTC prioritization list in January 13�' Council Packet; Public Hearing and adoption on January 27, 2009 of the Amended 2009 TIP; Info RCA in Council's April 8, 2009 packets regarding Amendment #2 — 2009 TIP. BACKGROUND: The City of Spokane Valley received $2.89 million in federal transportation grant funds from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) for the Sprague Ave Resurfacing — University to Evergreen Project. The contract documents were prepared under a design contract with Taylor Engineering. The project was advertised for bids on April 17�'. The scheduled bid opening date is Friday, May 8' Staff will provide tabulated results of the public bid opening at the May 12 Council meeting. OPTIONS: 1) Award contract to lowest responsible bidder; 2) Provide additional d�rection to staff RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to award the Sprague Ave Resurfacing — University to Evergreen Project contract to the Iowest responsible bidder. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS Th CO(�St�UCtlO�l �IIaS� Ot tfl project is 100°!, fully ARRA arant funded up to �2.89 million. STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Worley, PE — Senior Capital Projects Engineer Neil Kersten, AIA — Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS� (Bid tabulation to be provided at Council meeting.) �1T`Y �F �P��A�E VALL�Y ��qu��t #or �c��ancil �►cti�►n I�l�etir�� t�e: ��yr �i2, �� City Nl�n�g�r ��n�ff: lter�: ��ne�k �If th�a# a��ply: � can�en� [] c�1d ��sin�ss ❑ r��v �usir��s ❑ p�ibli�c ��rin�g � i��t��rrr��tion � adr�ain. �repc��t �] p�r�din� le�isl��ii�n ��N�A► IT�I�A TITL�: Pr��s�d �m�ndrrien#� t� T�win� Co�d� �G�V'ERNING LE��LAT�If3h�1; �1IPU�� .1� PRE�11��lS C(��MN��L �CT�t7�l T�►K��f; A,c��pt�� 11AJfC Ch�pter J. `� � ir� �QO� ta ��t�blish t�vu�� r�guf�ti�ns�. BA�C1��.t��.1NDP �urr�ntly th� �p�k�ne 4l'��1�r� �llurr��cip�l �+��f� re��rires a�V v�hicl�s v�hi�h ��'� tc�w�d p��su��r� t� p�rli�� ir�i#i�t�d ir�rp�ur�d� ir� th�e Cit� ta b� s��red ir� ��cilities Ic��t�d wi#hin #�� city iir�tits. Th� �� d�� n�t �rv►�id� a� �exceptic��r f�r �c�l�ce ��d ir�pound�s �f �unk v�l�ici�s �r tr�il�r�lm�nuf�ct�r�� f�ame�. �'I�i� �� prQ�le�natt� �ince �c�rr�ntly th�re ,�� c� ��r �camp�nie� u�ri�h stora�e f�+�ili�i�� t�+c�,t�� wi�hir� 5�ok�r�� V�lley'� ��#y �imifi� �r�%cl� are wifling to t�w �ith�:r j�nk v�hi�1+�� c�r �r�il+�rslrrranuf�ct�� hames. The Sp�ol��r�e �1a�l�y Pc�1ic� [��p�rtm�n� I��s ��qu�st�d th�t t�e ��nr�� c��d� �� am�rrd�� t� �Ila+�vv �unk vehicl�s ar�d traiker�lrr��nufa�cture�i �r�rr�� b�e t�vv��d #� f��iliti�s vutsjd� the �ity when tow�d purs��nt t�v � R�li�� in�ta��d im��ut�d. T�ris r�►�r�l� t�iv�; the ��li�� more �i�xik�ility ir� de�ling w�t�r imp�un�1� �hil�e p�r��erving th� c�nven��r�c� to ��tiz�n� �f h�vinc� per��r��l u�e��c��s tavv�d �rr� s�ore�d Ic��lly- ��T��hlS: NI,� f��C)MI'�E�Ji��3 �►,C7��]!� �R 11�O�T��1� �e�uncil !�ons�nsus t� pl�� r�ina�� orr fu�ur� ��uncil ag��nci� t� �r�er�s� ��akan� �lalfey �1lurricipal �c�d� refa�in� tc� �o�i�� i��itaa��i wmp�unds. �UC��G�Tl�Ii�AG�+�IA� 1�1�'A�T�: �TAF� CGNTA�T: lan �h�tr��:y, L,eg��l Irrterr�; Ca�y C��isk�Nl, ��puty �ity A�#�rn�y, PU1ike �QI��s �pol��ane Va�ley� �`raffie S��`��nt ATT►4C H �I��TS 1. Prc�pc��ed Arr��r�dnr��r��s t� Tvv�in� ��d+e DR9 FT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 09-* * * A1V ORDINANCE AMENDING SPOKANE VALLEY MUIVZCIPAL CODE SECTIONS 9.10.020, 9.10.090, 9.10.100 AND 9.10.130 RELATING TO POLICE Il`ZTIATED IIVIPOiJNDS. WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley previously adopted regulations relating to police initiated impounds; and WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valle}�'s Municipal Code currentiy does not distinguish between police initiated impounds of junk vehicles, manufactured homes, park trailers, and normal vehicles; and WHEREAS, the City of Spol�ane Valley's Municipal Code currently requires all vehicles to��ed subject to police initiated impounds to be stored in a facility located within the city limits; and WHEREAS, there are currently no facilities withi.n the City of Spokane Valley's city limits that are capable of accommodating mobile homes or park trailers, and no t�«�ing compan�� vith � storage facilin� ��ithin the cit�• limits is �villing to to«� ��ehicles; and V�'�IEREAS, junk ��ehi�les, mobile homes, and park trailers tc��ed pursuant to a police initiated impound are less likelv to be recovered immediateh� and so there is no stron;� rea��n tc� store them within the city limits. r NOW THEREFUR�, tlie Cit�• Council ot the Cin� of S�okane �'alle��. Spol:aile Cauntti�, Washingtan, ardains as follo«�s: Se�tion 1. Purpose. Tlle purpose of this Ordinance is to arnend the Spokane Valle}� Municipal Code sections related to police initiated impounds to establish separate towing lists for junl: vehicles, manufactured homes, and park trailers, and allow storage of such vehicles in facilities outside the City of Spokane Valley's city limits. Seetion 2. Amending Spokane Valle�� I�iunicipal Cocl� s�ction 9.1 t).020: S�' �'fC 9.10.020 is amended as foll��t�s: 9.10.020 Definitious. In construing the provisions of this chapter, except where otberwise plainly declared or clearly apparent from the context, words used in this chapter shall be given their common and ordinar�� meanings and, in addition, the following definitions shall apply: A. "Chief of police" means the chief of police of the City of Spokane Valley, or his/her designee. B. "City" means the City of Spokane Valley. C. "City-authorized tower" means a towing service having a valid and current registration filed tivith the City authorizing the furnishing of police-initiated impounds. D. "Impound" means the taking of a vehicle into legal custody, pursuant to law. E. "Police" means any authorized agent of the City of Spokane Valley police department or otller law enforcement agency having jurisdiction. F. "Police department" means the City of Spokane Valley police department. Ordinance 09- Amending Towing Page 1 of 7 DRAFT G. "Police-initiated impound" means the vehicle has been impounded at the direction of a police officer of the City. Police-initiated impounds do not include impounds ordered for evideatiary purposes bv the Spokane County sherif�s departrnent. H. "Private i.mpound" means the vehicle has been impounded at the direction of a person having control or possessioa of the private property upon which the vehicle was located. This chapter is not intended to cover private impounds. I. "Registered tow truck operator" means any person who engages in the impounding, transporting, or storage of unauthorized vehicles or the disposal of abandoned vehicles. (RCW � 46.55.010('7g)) J. "Tow truck" means a vehicle designed or intended to tow vehicles which are disabled by mechanical failure or physical damage or are being impounded pursuant to law. K. "Junk vehicle" rneans a iunk vehicle as set forth in SVMC 7.05.020. L. "Mobile home" or "manufactured home" means a strvcture, desi and coastructed to be transportable i� one or more sections, and is built on a permanent chassis, and desiQned to be used as a dwelling with or without a permanent foundation whe� connected to the required utilities that include plumbing, heating, and electrical svstems coatained therein. CRCW 46.04.302� M"Park trailer" or "�ark model trailer" means a travel trailer desi�ned to be used with temporary connections to utilities necessar�o�eration of installed fi�ctures and appliances. (RCW 46.04.622 Section 3. Amendin�.S�okane Valley Municipal Code section 9.10.090: SVMC 9.10.090 is amended as follows: 9.10.090 Secure storage facility. All City-authorized towers performing police-initiated 'unpounds shall maintain a building that the business occupies, either continuously or at regular times, where tow business books a�d records are kept and towing business is transacted. All towing businesses performing police-initiated impounds shall maintain a secure storage facility approved by the Washington State Pa�rol for the pwpose of securely storing towed vehicles. The � storage facility for class A Citv-authorized towers must be located within the City limits of Spokane Valley to ensure convenience to City residents in the retrieval of vehicles impounded at the direction of the police department. Storage facilities for class B and C Citv-authorized towers need not be within the City limits of Svokane Valley_ The place of business and storage facility shall comply with all applicable state laws and regulations. All vehicles impounded within the City as police-i.nitiated impounds shall be placed u�ithin the storage facility of the towing business performing the impound, and shall remain within the storage facility� until disposal or duly authorized order for release of the vehicle. (Ord. 04-001 § 9, 2004). Section 4. Amendin� Spokane Vallev Municipal Code section 9.10.100: SVMC 9.10.100 is amended as follows: 9.10.100 Towers aut6orized for police impounds. A. The police department is authorized to establish and mai.ntain a list of City-authorized towers that qualify for police-initiated impounds. City-authorized towers �ti�ho meet all of the following criteria shall qualify for police impounds and be put on the police tow list: 1. Meet all other requirements for registration under this chapter; 2. Possess a current letter of appointment from the Washington State Patrol for Zone 2; 3. Pay the annual registration fee. This fee shall be set by resolution of the city council. The registration shall expire on December 31 st of the year for which the license was issued and there shall be 4rdinance 09- Amending Towing Page 2 of 7 DRAFT no prorating of the license fee. The registration fee is a cost-recovery mechanism for contract administration; and The police tow list shall be reviewed at least annually to determine if each tower listed thereon still possesses a current letter of appointment. City-authorized towers qualified for police impounds shall be rated class A, B, or C registered tow operators according to the criteria sQecified in this chapter. Not�nst in this section shall be construed to r p �verit_ a tow� cam�an�� from re isterine fis more than one class of tow operator. B. Class A List. 1. The list of qualified class A registered towing businesses kept pursuant to this cllapter shall be used in connection with police-initiated impounds Qf vehicles which are not junk vehicles, manufactured homes, or park trailers within the City. 2. When a person makes a request to the police department or police dispatcher for towin�,� services when the vehicle is not subject to police-initiated impound, the request shall be treated as a no�preference matter and the request shall be referred to a qualified class A registered tow operator in the same manner as if the police were requesting the towing service pursuant to a police-initiated impound. C. Class B List l. The list of e�ualified class B re�ister�d towin¢ buswesses kept pursuant to t� chapter shall be used i� connection with aolice-initiated impounds of iunk vehicles within the Ci ,+. 2. U�on determinin� a police-initiated impound is necessary, the police officer shall specificallv state if the vehicle to be towed is a junk vehicle The dispatcher will relav this information to the �puropriate Class B Citv-Authorized tow�er in accordance �vith this chapter. D. C1ass C List 1 The list of qualified class C reRistered towing business ke�t pursuant to this chapter shall be �.:�,d in connection with Qolic.�initiated imnounds of manufactwed homes and park trailers within the C� 2. Upon deteiminiug a police-initiated im.pound is necessary, the police o�cer shall saecificallv state if the vehicle to be towed is a iunk vehicle The dispatcher will relav t.h�s information to the e,p�ropriate Class B Citv-Authorized tower in eccordaace with this chanter. E�. All referrals t�ef-s��isee�i �' ^� �`'_` ��''A�to class A Cit,y-authorized towers shall be distributed on a rotation basis among qualified class A�-��e�ed-towers. All referrals to class B Citv authorized towers shall be distributed on a rotstion basis amon�qualified class B towers. All referrals to class C G�..,ty-Autborized towers shall be distributed on a ratation basis amone aualified class C towers. ��. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to preclude any person from requesting the services of a towing business of their choice, unless, in the opinion of the police department, accommodatine such request ��•o�ild result in undu� delay or the maintenance of � hazardous sittiation or condition. I G�-.. Class A Cit��-aut�lorized towers sllall ob�e.�r�� tl�e follo«•ing practice� anci procc:dures �ti�hen engaged in police-initiated impounds: 1. When called by the police department, ihe tu�� business «ill disp.�tch a to«� truck «�ithin five minutes and be moving withi.n 10 minutes during norniaJ business hours; 2. Tow trucks dispatcbed at the request of the police department after norrnal business hours �� ill be on the move within 20 minutes after receiving the call; 3. The tow truck that is dispatched �vill arrive at the stated location within 30 minutes; 4. If for any reason a City-authorized tower is unable to dispaicb a tow truck within the stated time or if the dispatched truck will be delayed for any reason, the operator shall so advise the police department stating tbe reason and estimated time of arrival. In the event the tow truck fails to arrive at the scene within a reasonable time, the police department will contact another tow operator to respond to the scene and �ti�ill cancel the original tow; Ordinance 09- Amending Towing Page 3 of 7 DRA FT 5. A City-authorized tower on rotation who is unable to dispatch or arrive within the times stated in subsections (Ex 1), (2), (3 ) and (4) of this section will forfeit his tum and be placed at the bottom of the rotation list as if he had responded; 6. Consistent refusal or failure of the class A registered tow operator to respond to calls from the police department for to«�ing services may result in the removal from the list of qualified class A City- authorized towers; 7. The City-authorized tower shall advise the police department when the tow� company is temporarily unavailable to respond to rotational calls with a class A, B or C tow trvck. Unavailability may occur due to conditions sucb as, but not li.mited to, other tow truck commitments, tow truck disabled and/or under repau, unforesee❑ driver shortage due to illness, etc. The period of unavailability may last less than an hour or much longer. The tow operator will give the reason for unavailability and approximately when the company will be available to respond to calls; The tow company will be removed from the rotational list and will not be called until the operator advises the police department that the company is once again able to respond to calls v�•ith an A, B or C class truck. In all such cases, the tow company will resume its normal pasition on the rotational list ��ithout regard to any missed calls or its position prior to being unavailable; 8. The tow operator will advise the police department whenever a private call is received for to«� with circumstances that indicate that the tow is for a vehicle which has been involved in an accident on the public roadway. The tow operator also will advise the police department of all private calls to motor vehicle accidents on private property resulting in bodily injury or death; 9. The tow operator will notify the police department before moving any vehicle involved in an accident on a public hi�hway or street under the jurisdiction of the police department or where it appears that the driver of the vehicle to be moved is under the influence of intoxicants or drugs, or is other��ise incapacitated; 10. When the police department is in charge of an accident sceae or other such incident, a to«� operator shall not respond to the scene unless his services have been specifically requested by the police departmeat, the driver/owner, or his ag�nt; 11. The tow operator shall be available, or will ensure that specific employees are available, 24 hours a day for the purpose of receiving calls or arranging for the release of vehicles. This does not require the tow operator to maintain a staffed facilit}� 24 hours a day, only to have staff available to receive calls 24 hours a day. Business hours will be posted conspicuouslti� at the aperator's place of business so they can be seen during business hours and nonbusi�ess hours; 12. The operator shall post a current copy of tow and storage rates arising from police-initiated impounds in the following locations: a. At the entrance to the place of business, in a conspicuous location, plainly visible and readable by members of the public, whether the business is open or closed. If, in order to meet this requirement, the rate sheet must be placed in a location exposed to the elements, it shall be protected so as to remain legible; b. Inside the business location, where business is commonly transacted. The rate sheets shall be posted in such manner as to be cleariy and plainly visible and readable at all times by customers of the business; c. A copy of the current rates will be sent to the police department. Notice of any change(s) in service rates will be fonvarded to the police department at least 10 days before the effective date of the change(s); d. In the event that an operator has only a class B truck and utilize5 it for class A and B ty�pe tows, the operator shall file a rate sheet that specifies the rates charged for the different types of tows. Wheaever any operator utilizes a larger truck thari the towed vehicle warrants, the operator shall charge fees based on the size of the towed vehicle, not the size of the truck used. Example: A class C truck is used, at the operator's discretion, to tow a class B truck size vehicle. The fees charged shall be those for a class B, not a class C; Ordinance 09- Amending 'Iowing Page 4 of 7 DRAFT 13. Unless other arrangements are made with commissioned police personnel at the scene, all vehicles impounded by order of the police department shall be taken to the tow operator's nearest approved storage location within the City; 14. The tow operator will maintain, for three years, records on towed and released vehicles that were towed at the request of the police departrnent. This record will include, but is nat to be limited to: a. An itemized receipt of all charges for the services provided: b. An inventory sheet or eopy thereof made out by the police oi�ficer at tile scen� of the to�ti� and signed by the operator; c. All other records required by the police department. Such records will be available for inspection by the police department during normal business hours at the operator's place of business; l 5. The tow operator will sign an inventory sheet made out by the police of�icer at the scene. The to«� operator shall obtain from the officer, ��cl thc o�tirer �l.�:ill �?rc��ide, a;i�ned authoriz�tion for thc impound as required by RCW 46.55.080(�): 16 Tow operators shall perform t ��11111� la�� C�+III(1�'i�llt�� i::�t�l'�lli1'� l�` �t 1 ,ti,;;ilil�:�� +� care within the towing industry; 17. No City-authorized tower, employee or age«t sliall it�isapprupriatc, �� ruci�t�ull}� c:��n�� : r� t� � his/her own use, or abuse property belonging to another and entrusted to his/her care or storage; 18. Tow trucl: operaiors �vill use emergency lights to �varn other motorists only when at the sce�� of accidents, disabled vehicles and/or recoveries. Such lighting shall not be used when traveling to ��r from the scene; 19. Tow truck c�;-��,�:�� !��1( h� r��;��.;h:� f�7r �l:,;f�ii ,�:;�;;ic��it'�r;�i;]::lt _;��I�:. i,� Ct�� :�ll�l�� glass and debris; 2�. ►S�?EC1fIC OpCI'��illl� I �ill�l��t ll;�lil!!":;lll::llt�+, �i il�li�j� Cla�ti, iiC� '.:� �ullU�� : a. The standard air brake release tools (caging stud assemblies) required to be carri�:i in �� cia�; Band C trucks shall be used, whenever necessary, to preserve potenrial evidence involving bral:� equipment or adjustment settings. When a tow truck operator is attempting to move a vehicle equipped with locked spring parki�� brakes that cannot be released by external air suppty, the caging assemblies shall be used to release th : brake tension. Under no circumstances shall the towed vehicle's brake assemblies or adjustments h� moved or disturbed in any way that will ,�:�.��u 1:�._r �3�tcrl��i��;�Fi�.�>> ;:` t!�� r�-a��i..��ni ��: i� settings. b. Class B trucks in excess of 23,0(1U puuntia gr��„ ��l�i�.l< «ei�l�t ra illl4J' I1tC�I IlUI �;:��►-� J��lli�� when towing or recovering heavy vehicles. c. Class D, E and S trucks shall not be used to respond to initial calls unless specificall�� authorized by police personnel at the scene or by local written policy approved by the chief of police. d. Class E trucks shall: i. When used for multiple vehicle towing/recovery (c�n� ��n hcd. �n� in to��l, �11 in��oice ch.�r`�� shall be eveoly divided between the vehicles so transported; ii. Not be operated in excess of either �ro;� ��ehi::l�? «��i�_E11 racin�� or ��r�:h;�`�c� t,:�n�►.:`,� «<i`}lt limits; iii. Be required to carty its portable liglits onl}� «tien used in a to" in� �i��>de:; 21. Whenever a special event or overflow storage lot is approved by the police department, the City-authorized tower shall maintain personnel at the lot 24 hows per day for security and vehicle and/or personal property release. If necessary, reimbursement for such labor sha11 be part of the contract for tlie special event, if appropriate, or by amended stora�e rates «�ith a��aiver of the 10-dati• rate change notice requirement approved by the police department. At the conclusion of a special event or o��erflow situation, all ��ehicles not reclaimed by tlie otiti�ner shall be towed to the City-authorized tower's regular storage facility and processed in the nonnal Ordinance 09- Amending Towing Page 5 of 7 DR9 FT fashion. No additional fee shall be charged for to�ving the vehicle from the overflow lot to the regular facility; 22. All work performed by the operator and/or employee shall be in the most professional and expeditious manner. All invoices and other required forms sba11 be completed accurately and promptly. H. Class B City-authorized towers shall observe the same practices and procedures as class A tOwers wheo performin�police impounds with the followiri� exception: 1. Unless other arrangements are made with commissioned police personnel at the scene, all vehicles impounded by order of the �olice department shall be taken to the tow operator's nearest avproved storage location. That storage location need not be within the ci limits. I. Class C City-authorized towers shall observe the same practices and procedures as class A towers when performing.uolice-initiated impounds with the following exceptions: 1. Sections G�11 and G�1 of this chapter shall not apply to class C towers 2. The tow truck that is dispatched will arrive at the stated lacation within 24 hours; 3. Unless other arrang.ements are made with commi.ssioned police persoaael at �he scene, all vehicles impounded by order of the police department shall be taken to the to�v operator's nearest approved storage location. That storage location need not be within the ci limits. J�. Records kept on City of Spokane Valley police-initiated impounds shall be available for inspection by the police department dwing normal business hours. (Ord. 04-001 § 10, 2004). Section 5. Amendin� Spokane Vallev Municipal Code 9 S�'1�'IC 9.1 G.130 is nmended as follo�ti�s: 9.10.130 Fees c6arged b�- tow operator for police-iniNated impounds. The schedule of maximum fees shall conform to, and nat be more than, the schedule of maximum fees then in effect by the Washington State Patrol. The schedule of maximum fees may be adjusted periodically by the police chief to conform to any adjustrnents made by the Washington State Patrol to its schedule of maxi.mum fees. � Any class B or C licensee shall not exceed the fees of such schedule for services rendered at the request of the police department or its dispatcher. Gharging fees in excess of those specified in the fee schedule, or charging for services not actually rendered, may result in suspension from the list of class A, B. or C City-authorizec� towers. Private impound fees are set by the tow operator and r�ecorded v�•ith the Department of Licensing in accordance with Washington State Patrol �uidelines, and are not intended to be covered by this chapter. (Ord. 04-001 § 13, 200�). Section 6. Severabilitv. If any sectior�, sentence, clause or phrase of this Urdinaiice should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of an�� other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinanc�e shall become e�ective five days after publication of the ordinance, or a summary thereof, in the official newspaper of the City. Adopted this day of 2009. City of Spokane Valley Mayor, Richard Munson Ordinance 09- Amending Towing Page 6 of ; �� A►'�'1'��T; �ity �l�rk, +��r�s�ine Ba��br�d,g� A�pr�u�ed ss #a Far�n: C�f�c� �f th� �it,� Attc�rne�� C�r��anc� (?�-� �tn�n�i�� Ta��•in� F�� 7�f 7 . CITY OF SPC)KANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 12. 2009 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old �us�ness ❑ new busncss ❑ public hearing ❑ information � admin. report ❑ pending leg�slation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Spl�shdown 2009 Contract Update GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Six-r��onth contract extensior� �pproved in 2008. BACKGROUND The City has proposed to simplify the process by asking for an annual lump sum lease payment generally based upon payments from the past five years, rather than percentages based upon various revenue streams. Splashdown is in agreement with the proposed contract. Contract Hiqhlights: -Contract term is a ten-year contract with two five-year renewal options. -Contract provides parking for Splashdown in Valley Mission parking lor -City assumes maintenance responsibility of the south parking Iot. E� ,� :� �:_> �� ._� :- �� c� .,�:�� and Valley Mission park guests will use this lot as well for overflow parking. -Lease payment will be an annual lump sum, beginning at $40,000, payable in 1f��e� equal payments that increases every two years for the first six �,r�=.�� t��= � Jf1T(�c3 ��:t. topping out at $46,000 per year for the ten-year term -Lessee continues to pay for all operating expenses anct r�::.�. -Rema�ncier of �greem�nt is simil�r to nrevious agrnemert OPTIDNS: Aciv��nce contr�ct to f��1ay 19, 200� ag�nda OR Pro�� icie �dditional direcfian to staff. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION Consensus to place the Splashdown cor�tract on the May 19, 2009 aaenda for ap�roval. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Reverlue to City. STAFF CONTACT: Michael D. Stone, Director of (�ar ks and Recreation ATTACHMENTS: Draft Contract �'A�'�R SL�D� A�+��;EIV��T �'�� .�.��E�'IEN�, r��ad� ��d ��ter�d �tc� �s � day� vf 1'�'la�� d��J�, bv �d b�t�r��n +�ity c�f Spokar�� r'�Il�y, � r��unicip�li�y �f the Sta�� of �a�kur�,�tr�n, havi.n� af�ie�s f�r the t�a.��a��i�n c�f l��asin��s a� 11 �f�? ��t Spra�� r�F�r�u��, Suite 10�, �pc�kar�e `�r''alley, '�V��ir�gtan, '��2�3�, ��rein��r ref�rred to �s th� ""+��`"�'",�" �nd Spl�s�-�]��,� �c�nc��a��ts, ��e. ��wtng �a�i�c�s f�or ��e tr�ns�c��+�r� c��` k�us��ss at �� c�ut� ��nito ��ulev�r�, �pc��C�r�e, '4��1��C7�t�an, �9�(��, ��e�einaf��r r�f�rr�ecl t� a� the "�J�S��, �t�in�ly, her�in�ft+�r ref�rr��l �o �lo�.� ��th t�� 'I��'` �s ih� "P�-'��tTIES." 'W7T']'��55�7'�: 'V�V��'� pursu�� tc� tfa� p�r��r��ic�r�s �� F�+C�W 3��.1 I.�2+�, a��ty n�a�� r ��11 �n�r �ark pro��, �uildin,�� c�r faei�itie� surpl�s t� its n��d�. �r nc� lc�r�� u�t��ble ��r �ar� p�urpv�+es; a�d �I�l�:�►�, �ity �� pQ�ane V�l�y �� t�� c��r of: �'al.l�� 1'�i�s��n Fark, �ac��d �t 1142� ��t 1"w+Ii�sian, 5p�ka�� V�.11�y, �'�shingt�n which t��e �ity�. �equired �al�e�� l��Iissi�r� Farl� �r��n ��c��an� �"au�t�� u��n �nc�rpc�r�tt�n �.�f t�ie �ii�� it� ?�1��: �n�l '4'��A�� d C�1°��.P�1 �C}Pf.l[?Tl �}� �'`�I1��' �1r'�1S51C111 �c�C�► �h dec:lz3:ret� s�uplu� tc� �h� pre�ent ar�� +��se��ik�l.� ��e�i +�� p�+�l�ri� ��aun�y �r� �� Bc��rd c�� `��flt� ��n��i��i�ner� c�f Spo�k�.ne +�c��ir�t� p�ur�ua�� t� �.esc�lutit�n 1�1�. �?-��; �� W.E3�E�l��i�, p��rs�.'�n� t+� ��aluti�an N�. ,��Q4��, �� Bo�+d +�f �c�u��y Cr��lrini��i�r��r� au�h�ri�� +��t��u�%+�t� t�f � 4�ater ��ide �i�r�ea�ent �ith ��l�sh-I�+a�n �o��s��oz��, �nc:. �ur��r�.t tc� �,°hich �pP��h-'�a�rn Cc�n��sican leas�e� a p�r�i�❑ �f ��11�� 'ii�si+�n P'�rk ��r � p�riv�i �f t�ra �1(�� .� to �c�nst�uct a�d c�p�rat� a �.vater �lid�� ,and �''��A�, purs�ant t� ��es�Iut��n �'+Ja. '��-� (�1$, �h� Ba�'d �f �oun�y ��n�n�is�ec�r��r� ��r1:��ri��c� e�e�c�t�an c�T a�afih�� 1�at�r �lide ��re�rne�t w�th S�Ia�I�- Dc�wn Ccrnc�ss�t�ns. I��. pursu��t tc� ��hi�l� ��D�� +��n�cessi�ns lease�d ��art,i��t c�t '��lley 1'vfiss�on F�:rk f�r � ��b��qu�ent ter� �ft�� 1�� y�ars �a v��rate � ��ate� slid� ��ch ��a�+� t�rr�in��ir�� c�n ,T��'�r � �, ?��?: �d 'Nr'I��►►,�, The �a�ki�� :��u��r� � r�p�a��r�ent ��r�ern��t in ?{�(��, for � ;��r�a� �+f �v� �� ear� �n� ��id ��em�r�� as c�n��y�d tv tI�� #� c�� c�� alte�r and �ubs�qu+�r�tlya t��e 2�� A�r�ement te�rr�t��t�� by its t�rms on Jul�r �(l, 2��7.. I��O��', T�IEI��[[�� f�r �-t�i ir� c�nsider�tinn c�� th� nlu�ual }arc�rnt�e� set for ��r�� the P�.��'I�S her�fic� d� rr�utu�I� a�r�� as ��lln��: �ectic�� l, �_u'b�ect A�nd Purpo�e - Th� GI`�'°'�` le,�se to L��L��, su��ct tc� the t�rr�� a.nd cc�ndit��n� l�erein c�rntair��c�, ��t.� r��1 prc+perz:r in �'�I�y 1'��s�ic�r� Parl� l�r�at�d �t � 11=�� Ea�t h�iissi�rr�, �p+�k�� Ja��ey �'ashin�tc�n, an� rr��r� p�i�cr�larly� desc:�ib�d �� f�l lc��r�: T��at ��r�ic��l o� �3�� 72, ��, 7� ��i�xg ��urt�� l�t� ��f�y �n� Bl��l�� , ?9, � 1�nd S� a11 1� Pir��cr�� Fi�st ��dit��an accur+dii�� ta �1�t h�r�c�f r�e�arc��d � B��rk �"�vi°" c�f �"��t�, I�a�e ��. '�pc��.ane �C��r�ty, �a:�hirt�tvr�. "T��et�er urith tl��t �ar�:�€�n c�f �,s��ted Jc�h�s�rr Stre�et �dj�inin� sai�d �lnc�:s. E�c+�pt t��►� '��'es�t 110� f��t c�#` ��i� �lr��€s �� 7� 78 and ��; a.l��a, �xc�pt the �a�t �=��.7 f��t �f ��i� �lc��k� ��6, '79� �nd �� ,1�� c��t th�t pQ�ti�n c��" s�d Blc�+��. �� nd ��c�ted Jc�hn�c�n S�re�t �ncl�ded rrv�thin t�� :�istin� ter;��i� ��urts. �.'��tai�in� �.�b ��re� mv�e +�r l�ss. Her�ina�t�r r�f�rred tcr as t}�� "'Premis�s" f�r th� �ur�os� c�f c�nsti-�ctin� and c�p�r�tin� c�n� v��vat+�r sli�de �r �li�,�s and r�l�t��d 1�d��a�i�� us�s. Th� I.��SS.��; is �r�n�ec� � coa�cessian r��ht �c� se�.l fc�ad, s��it dr�nks, act��v�e w+ear �nd sc�u�r�nir� �on th� pr�rnis�s ��1si�t�r�t u�ri�h +��ratio� af th� �Fat�� li�i�.3. ri �� .��r��m�n.t #c�� F�r�i:rr� Lc�t, �:J��+�uted ��,�t 7, ?��1 ��en Sp4�.an� ��c�rit�� s�d L�:�SE�, Spak�n� �c�ur�t}� Resc�lutiar� n�ar��a�� C� 1-{}°� ��, e�pir+�c� r�n Ju�� , ?�(�?. �r�d r��as �r�� r�n�e�red. LE��EE ar�d it:� c�ient� �ar� pe�n-�itt�� tc� usc� �ttle ��ved ��rl�.ir�,� l�i� ir�.�di�ttel�F �t��a�:�t1� 1.D IVIlSSi[�� ►r,"�, Ci �l�fl��7 �I7C�. SC]Ll��} fU� �3��5�� C�1r�C�I� r�la�ed �� t��e ��erati�r� a�� c�rr��a1 r�s�. c�f �hc: wat+�rparl�, �u��t tc� a1I tc�n�iti�n� s�t fc�rt�� in t�Y� ��k�� '�.�Il�y ��i��p�� t��. 7�� Cit� r��rtf�s th� ri�}��t �� de�i�nat� �pac�� °or sp��c�fic us�s whi�h r�,ay pl�� lir�itati�an� �n us� b� ��lash�c�v�n. LE�SEEE is nc�i p�r��itt��. t� �3ri�r� c�u��c��: c�f t�e p�'�:i��, lat area, �u�� s an th� �r�ss +ar sid��ta�k�, withc�ut ��e�ifi� �tt�n �e��issic�T� frt�r� the l�ar�.s I]ir��or. '�cctian �. 7��n - "�he in�tial term �t t�his �,�C'�+�111�T1'� �h�li l�� f�o� ��n (I�� y��e�rs ��mr��n�ing �r� 11rf �y 1. 2�1!�'�, �nd ��rr��inat�r�� or� .�gril ��, �� 1�. 7't�is A�re�.rt�ent sh�l� l��v� tw� �d�i�i��n�� f v� year ��t`ron peri�+�s,. �ac�i r�f �v��li�� ay �� r�r��we� �t the �nutu�� +a�ti�n caf ti�� P��#:ies. F'r��ided, ��w��ver, tl�e ren�v�r�� sh��l �� sul�j�ct t� all �rc�� ris��ns s�C �c�rih herei�. L��E �hall i.�dlicat� its i�t�nt t� re��ew t�i� � ��. gi�is�� t�e �"I�"Y at ]��t :�ia� ��) rr�n�n�� vri�ten r��ice pri�r� t� �be end �f th� uut�� t�rrn. �ec#�c�n �. �on�tr�ct�a►n r�� 51ide. �, �ES��E, �.t its s�le� expen��, s��a�j �p�r�� d m�int�an �� the Fr��i�� a u�a��r slid� ar �li��s, t��eth�r ��fi�� ap�r�,�n��e fefi�ing, su�� st� l�nds�apin�, spl��h �t�o�, ��d �1 related ��ciliti�� a�c� ��.�uipr��t��. I�1a chan�e �r m�a�i��at�or� c�f t�t� �1�►►n� �nd s�a�ci�c�ti�a�s �u�mitte�i �� ,�� t�a th� �ITY �� i��r�vrate� herein ��J ref��c� shal l be �na�c�� un1e�� rst �.ppr��v��i �y t�e C�'�. If at �ny� time dur�� the lif� �f �hi� �t�r��n�e�� tli� I�F�►�EF f��I� �� :�e th� Pr�m�� f�r th� �t�r��e �i` c�nstruc�ic�� `� and operation of a water slide or slides, W1L�lOUt FIISt Obt�11IllII� petIl11�ti1t�I1 II1 �LI'illll 1T��II1 the CIT�', this Agreement ma�� lt tl�� ('1�1'�''ti ��tic hc j�i'Illlll�t�l�. B. If LESSEE desires to acid adciitional ilumes, apparatus or uthc:r re�.rc;ational items or facilities other than those originally proposed, LESSEE shall first obtain writter � permission for the CITY at least ninety (9�► cl:�� T�r�;{ t�� tl�� r,trt ��f c,,r,�tr��t►�,��. <�r��i obtai n al1 necessar` � �,�,-. � �� , � �� ►. . . ..� _1 � � � � � : t � . Section 4. Operatiun ��t >ii�l A. During the term or� tivs Agreemeiit tl�e L�:S�L� shall initiate, coutrac;t tor and obtain in its own n: . � � ! '_ : �' '. -� -� i' . . - > > , .. � _ . . _ � . . . � _ . _ . � � . forth in Sectioa 11 � B. Refuse, el��tric;ity, h�at, li�;tlt�, po��er, tc;l�}�ll�nc; �e:r�ic�, anei �li utii�r �ublic utilities of every kind furnished to the Premises throughout the term hereof, and all other costs and expenses af every kind �vhatsoever of ar in connection with the use, operation and maintenance of the Premises and all activities conducted thereon and the CITY shall have no responsibility of any kind whatsoever for any thereof. C. LESSEE shall operate the slide for public use during such months and hours as it deems proper; provided, however, that hours of operation shall comply v��ith all provisions as set for in Section 28 (Land Use Action) of this Agreement, such hours of operation which may be imposed in conjunction v��ith any subsequent land use action, if any, or Spokane Valley Municipal Code provisions, which may be adopted, whichever is most restrictive. D. Any signage must comply with cunently adopted City Code provisions. E. LESSEE shall not discriminate against a.ay employee or applicant fo1 employment, or patran on the grounds of race, color, sex, national origin, creed, marita i status, age or presence of any sensory, mental or physical handicap or the use of a traine�i guide dog or ser�rice doe bv a disahled rers�n. Section 5. F��. A. The LESSE�: shall pay to the CITY for the initial and renewal terms of t i� Agreement a lump sum lease payment as described: $40,000 annually for the first tu�� (2) years; $43,000 annually for the next two (2) years; and $46,000 annually for th� remaining six (6) years of the first term. At the end of the first 10 year tertn, these payments will be re��ie�ved and adjusted accordingly by consent of both parties. B. The yearly lease payment shall be paid in three e��ual installments, with the first due to the City on July 5, the second on August 5, and the third on September 5 of each seaso�. ; Section 6. Slidc U« - Il is understuod that the �vater slide is a proprietary pru�iuct of the LESSEE. The CITY obtains no interest therein as a part of this Agreement and may not use any of its specific plans, structures or components without the expres� consent of I,F,SSEF. except as provided hereinafter. Section 7. (��ner�hi� ��f Impro��ments - All impro`�ements and ecluipment placed on the Premises by LESSEE shall be and remain the property of LESSEE, and the CITti' shall have no interest therein except as provided hereinafter. Section 8. Termination - In addition to all other rights and remedies, which the PARTII;S ma�� hat�e herein or at la��, the PARTIES ma}� tern�inate this Agre�ment as follows: Bv I,L;SSCL-: This Agreement may be terminated b}• ihe LESSEE upon thirty (30 j da} «�ritten notice to the CIT'Y upon the happening of any one of the follo��ing events: 1. The default of Spokane Valley in the performance of any terms, conditions or covenants herein required to be performed by the CITY and the failure of the CITY to remedy such default within a period of thirty (30) days after the receipt from the LESSEE of w7itten notice to remed}j the same; provided, however, tllat no notice of termination as herein provided shall be of any force or e�ect if the CITY shall have remedied the default prior to the expiration of such 30-day period, or if the nature of such default is such that a period in excess of thirty (30) days is necessary in order for the CITY to cure the default and shall diligently continue its efforts to correct such default. In such e�rent, th� C'1TY shall have such time as is reasonably required to cure the default. B�� CI�I�l': "I�his Agreei�ient may b� terclli►lated b�' Spu�:aile �'alle} 11pOI1 t�lirt}' (�(1) d��s «� notice to the LESSEE upon the happening of any of the following areas: 1. The failure of the LESSEE to make any payments of money as reyuirecl l�ereunder after receivin� ten (1 Q) da��s ��-ritten tlotice of its failurc t� �a�� such m�ne��. 2. Abandoilment ot� the I'remises bti� the LESSEE �uid,�or the continuancc of unauthorized conduct and operation of the business required hereunder for a period of five (5) consecutive days. Failure to operate the business as authorizeti herein would be considered abandonment. Provided, however, that the CITY understands and agrees that LESSEE'S operation is seasonal and closing the Premises for tbe season or interruptions in the operation of the ��vater slide due to weather conditions or repairs shall not constitute an abandonment of the Premises. � 3. "l'be default ot� L�SS�� in thc; perfonnanc:e of� any ternls, conclitic�i�, c�r covenants herein required to be performed by the LESSEE and the failure of the LESSE�= to remedy such default in a period of thirty (30) days after receipt of written notice t�_� remedy the same. Provided, however, that no notice of termination as herein provided shall be of any force ar effect if LESSEE shall have remedied the default to the sol�: satisf'action of the CITY prior to the expiration of such thirty (30) days is necessary i�1 order for LESSEE to cure such default, and LESSEE shall have commenced to cure th�� default �nd shall diligently continue its efforts to correct such default. In stich event. LESSEE shall have such time as is reasonabl�� rec�uired to cure the default. �ct�ti��n �. P_�°n �,}� � � „��, ,•, ��- - , , , . ,.. : 1!1 1:1L �'.��ll ��'! l�ililllit:ll��il \'! lji� il�:,� lllll�;ll . l�l .l.`� �'l\�� Ill`�} �IL1�111 Ilil� PARTIES shall ha��e their remedies �cc�rciin� tn Ia�� and in �dditi�n sh;�ll ha��e th� follow�ing remedie- Ry� [,Il�S��: In the event of termination by LESSEE, and except as protirided herein, LESSEE shall have the right to remove the water slide, removable supporting structures, buildings and other improvements placed upon the Premises by LESSEE at any time within 120 days after such termination. LESSEE shall restore the Yremises to its original condition during the same time frame allowed for removal of the structure. By CITY: In the event of termination by Spokane Valley as provided herein or at the end of the term of this Agreement, the CITY shall have the right for a period of ninety (90) days after termination to purchase the water slide, suppor! structures, buildings and other improvements from the LESSEE at a price to be mutuali�, agreed upon. In the event the CITY shall not exercise its right to purchase the wat� � slidz, support stzvctures, buildings and other improvements within the ninety (90) da} period, the LESSEE shall remove the same within 120 days af�er the expiration of �<<ch ?l.�T•t��.� '�rt�j �"`�: (1��:� 1�,` �1't'T?1��`�: fil �1�. I11"li�l �"1.1 i�il i�lfli� �111��T " f��!,� ��11�i' ��C' 11',''jTl:` �_ t t 1. . � t rl tl ;. L _ ♦:. lll 1�i` `, t♦I1♦ �. i li ��L.11.11l�ll.�. .l l� . �Lll 1 IL�i_ .� l'1 .� lLl��.�. t�. ...�. �.1-. ��.t�1 �i � l L�SS�E does not remove the water slide, supporting structures, building and othc � improvements placed upon the Premises by the LESSEE within the time frames set fortl � herein, the CITY may at its option, (1) on the payment of one dallar ($1.00) take title t� � said propzrty; or (2) dismantle, remove and store such property at a location convenie��: to the CITY and char_._ �,, 1 I I��I�� .� `_��-- ' �� '- ='.._.;`:. . ..��,�, , �, . �-��= � ��_ �,�_' ,� storing said proper� � Section 10. Wast� azl�l NuiSa�ice 1'roliibitc;ci - lluriii� th� tc;riii ul this A�Tc:4IIltlli. LESSEE shall comply w all applicable laws affecting the Premises, the breach i� � which might result in any penalty on the CITY or forfeiture of the CITY'S title to th�� Premises. LESSEE shall not commit. or suffer to be committed an� �� ::�1 <<>> �� fl� Premise�. �r nliisanc� ; Section 11. Se��ers. �I Parties agree to the fallo«�in� allacation of cosis with regarc� t� se��r: A. Sewer Capital Facilities Rate: LESSEE shall be responsible for paying all Sewer Capital Facilities Rate charges (i.e. ERU's) allucable to LESSEE'S use of the Premises. B. L�SS�� s�iall pay� all constructiun costs incurrzd to connect new service, increase service due to expansion of the w�ater slide facilities, and to maintaiil sewer service. LESSEE shall, at their expense, install an additional water meter(s) t�� measure the flo�v �f «�ater entering the se«�c�red portion of the Premis�s. C. LESSEE shall re-pa}� the City all anlounts previously owed for General Facilities Charges (GFC), $5,818.75, prior to opening for business for the 2010 season. D. LESSE� shall hook up to sewer when required by Spokane County, or when the City, as the owner of the property, is notified by Spokane County that hookup is required. E. LESSEE shall pay all monthly sewer char�ts allocahle tv L�SSL-'�:'S us�° of' the Premises. Section 12. Notices. A. All notices, demands, or other �ti� in this Agreement pro��ided to be given or macie or sent or whicb may be given, or made or seat by either Party hereto to the other, shall be deemed to have been fully given or made or seni when made in writin� and deposited in the United Statement mail, certified, postage pre-paid and return receipt I r�yuested, anc� adcire�se�j as fullo��s: T�� 'I�I'l': C:it}� of Spukane �%all�ti� 11707 East Sprague Avenuc:, Suite 106 Spokane Valley, Washington 99260 To LESSEE: Splash-Down Concessions, lnc. 2922 South Manito Boulevard Spokane, Washington 99203 B. "I'he address to which any notice, demand or any other writing may be gi�•en or made ��r sent to any Party as above provided ma}• be changed by written notice given by such Party as above provided. Section 13. Insl�rance. The LESSEE shall prucure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which 6 may arise fron� or in connection w7th the LESSEE's operation and use of the leased Premises. No Limitation. LESSEE's maintenance of insurance as required by the agreement shall not be construed to limit the liability of the LESSEE to the coverage provided by such insurance, or other��-ise limit the CITY's r�course to anv remedy a�-ailable at la«� or in equity. A. Minimum Scope of Insurance Lessee shall obiai.n insurance ot� the types described belo��: 1. Commercial General Liabilitv insurance shall be �� oil Insuranc�.� Services Office (ISO) occurrence form CG 00 O1 and shali cover premises and contractual liability. The CITY shall be named as ac� insured on LESSEE's Commercial General Liability insurance polic�� using ISO Additional Insured-Managers or Lessors of Premises Forn� CG 20 11 or a substitute endorsement providi.ng equi��alent coverage. 2. Property insurance shall be written on an all risk basis. B. Minimum Amuunts of Insura�ce LESSEE shall maintain the following insurance limits: 1. Commercial General Liabilitv insur�ance shall be ��ritten �vith limits no less than $1,000,000 each occurrence, $2,000,�00 general aggregate. 2. Pro e� insurance shall be written covering the full value of LESSEE's property and improvements for their fvll replacement value « no coinsurance pro�•isions. C. Other Insurance Provisions The insurance policie5 are to contain, or bc c�ilc�c�rsed to ront th�� ii�llc��i�l` rr��i:�i��1� li�r ( 'umm�rcial (ien�r��l I.iahilit�� insuran�t: 1. �l hc 1.l��SI�I�' lI1S111'ZI1C� co��era�� shall b� ��I"1I11�1I'�" llltilll'�111C� a respect the Gity. Any Insurance, self-inswance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the CITY shall hc e�c�ss llf t�l� i.rssrr insurancc.� and shall n�t cc.�ntri�utc ��ith it. ?. �l�ll� LES��:�'s ii�suralic� shall h� endi�r�ed t� stzte th�it co��rabc shall not be cancelled by either party, except after thirty (30) days pri��r «rritten notice by certiiied mail, return receipt recluc.tc�l, ha� heen given to the CITY. D. Acceptability of tnsurcrs Insurance is to he Placed w�th insurers ��•ith a current A.M. I3e�t rutin� ol� nt�t lc`� than A:V1I. 7 E. Verifics�tion of Co��eragc L�SSEE shall funush the CITY �vith original certilicates and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of the LESSEE. Sectiun 14. Indemnification and �Iold Harmless. LESSEE sha11 defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the CtTY, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, suits, actions, or liabilities for inj ury or death of any person, or for loss or damage to property, which arises out of LESSEE's use of Premises, or from the conduct of' LESSEE's business, or from any activity, work or thing done, permitted, or suffered by LESSEE in or about the Premises, except only such injury or damage as shall have been occasioned by the sole negligence of the CITY. Section 15. Attornev's Fees - If any action at law or in equity shall be brought to enforce the provisions af this lease or to enforce or inierpret any of the covenants, terms, or conditions of this lease, or for the recovery of the possession of the Premises, each Partv shall pay all of their own attorney's fees. Section 16. Re airs. �1. LESSE� shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, at its own cost, and �vithout any expense to the CITY, keep and maintain the Premises, including ALL buildings and improvements of every kind which may be a part thereof, and all appurtenances thereto, including sidewalks adjacent thereto, in good, sanitary� and neat order, condition and repair. The CITY shall not be obligated to make any repairs, replacements, or renewals of any kind, nature, or description, v�•hatsoever to the Premises, or any buildings or improvements thereon. B. The LESSEE shall control all rodents and other pests that may be on or in the Premises during the term of this Agreement. C. The LESS�;E shall provide trash and garbage r�ceptacles and have r�ii�se removed from the Pr�mises on a regular basis. D. Compliance with all applicable laws and regulations promulgated or enforced by Spokane Regional Health Department. Section 17. Insolvencv or Bankruptcy - If LESSEE becomes insolvent, voluntarily or involuntarity bankrupt, or if a recei��er, assignee or other liquidating officer is appointed for the business oF the LESSEE, then the CIZ'�' may ternlinate t�lis Agr�ement. Seetion 18. L�SSEE'S Employees - LESSEE shall conduct a backgroun�i check on all employees working at the water slide or any concessions operated on the Premises. LESSEE shall ensure that each employee presents a neat and clean appearance in persoi� and in dress �vhile on duty on the Premises. The LESSEE shall take immediate remedial 8 action, which shall include terminati�n in the event an}� of LESSEF:'S employees condt�ct themselves in an improper or inappropriate manner while on duty. Section 19. Liens - LESSEE shall keep the Premises free and clear from all mechanics' and materialmens' and other liens from work or labor done, services performed, materials, applia�ces, teams or power contributed, used or furnished or to be used in or about the Premises for or in connection with any operations of LESS�E, or any alteration, improvement, repairs, ar additions which the LESSEE raay m�ke or permit or cause to be made, or any work or construction by, for, or permitted by LESSEE c�n or about the Premises. Section 20. Comvliance with Leasehold Excise Ta�:. �-1. LESSEE h�reb�r acknowledges that to the e�tent this Agreemznt is subject ta the "leasehold excise tax" as set forth by RCW 82.29A as now or hereinafter amended, the same shall promptly be }�ai�i rti� thc I.F:tiSI:F. in �i�jC�itl(�Tl tt� th�� f��s �ct f�rth in Section 5 of'this Agreement. B. LESSEF agrees to pr�nlptly pa}� ��hen �iue all tax��, rat��, �har�e� an�! assessments, special or otherwise and public charges of every kind and nature which ma� be lawfully imposed or assessed in any way on the LESSEE with reference to tl�� Premises. The LESSEE further agrees to pay promptly when due all taxes imposed c.�� LESSEE as a result of the services provided upon the Premises, includin`.� h<<t n��t li,�lic��j to, all sales, busines�, occupancy and use taxes. C. L�SSEE shall also comply with and abide by all iederal, st�te, count� . municipal and other governmental statues, ordinances, laws and regulations affecting tl�� Premises, the construction, operarion and maintenance of the water 11id� th�r��n. th� improvements thereon, or any activity conducted on or in such Premisc�. Sectio� 21. Non Liability of CITY - Theft Bur�larv or Vandalism - The CIT'Y shall not bz liable in any manner for any loss, injury or dama�e incurred by the LESSEE from any acts of tbeft, burglary, or vandalism. The LESSEE shall be responsible for providing all expenditures relating to any security precaution that LESSEE deems necessary for the safety of the personnel, guests, employees, patrons, or users of the premises, or propert}� of LESSEE located on the Premises. The LESSEE shall implement securitv measures sufficient to �ecure the Pre►l�is�s after hours and prevent unauthorized t�s�. Section 22. Relationship of thz PAR�I�IES. A. The PARTIES intend that an independent LESSEE relationship w�ill b� created by this Agreement. The CITY is interested in only the results to be achieved, and the conduct and control of the services will lie solely with the LESSEE. The LESSEE �,vill be solely and entirely responsible for its acts anci the acts of its agents, employees, servants, suh-lesse� or otherwise during the performance of this Agreement. 9 B. in the performance of tbe serviczs herein contemplated, the LESSEE is an independent Contractor with the authority to control and direct the performance of the details of the work aad provisions of the services, the CITY being interested only in the results obtained. Hawever, the services coniemplated herein must meet the approval of the CITY and shall be subject to the CITY'S general right of inspection and supervision for the purpose of determining whether the services are being performed in accordance with the specificati�ns set for herein. C. No agency, employment or partnership is created by this Agreement. LESSEE'S business is separate and apart from that conducted by the CITY. Neither Party will have authority to act for the other in any obligations or elpenses «�hatsoever oi� the other Party. Section 23. Venue Stipulation - This Agreement has been and shall be construed as having been made and delivered within the State of V4'ashington and it is mutually understo�d and agreed by each garty thereto that tliis Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington, both as to interpretation and performance. Any action at law, suit in equity, or judicial proceeding for the enforcement of this Agreement or an}� provision hereof shall be instituted and maintained onlv in anv c�f thc Courts of com�etent jurisdiction in Src�kane C'c�unt}'. ��'ashin�tvn. Section 24. Assi Ilnit',III - E,aC�l Pc1I"ly' t0 1�11S A�ICC'IT1LIll �.11I1C�S LIlEI11S�IV their par��trs, successors, executors, administrators, and assigns to the other Party of this Agreement and to the Party's successors, executors, administrators and assigns of each other Part}� t�•ith respect to all terms, cond.itions and covenants set forth herein. The LESSEE ma}• not assign, transfer in whole or in part its interest in this Agreement without the same being first authorized by resolution or motion of the City Council. A decision by the Citti� C'ouncil to provide consent or denial shall be communicated to the LESSEE within a reasonable time frame not to exceed Uurly (30) calendar days of written request. The City Council's decision shall be made considering, among other factors, the financial stability, experience in operating/owning water slides and related recreational facilities, and ability to meet conditions v�rithin this Agreement. In the event of an assignment, the assignee shall assume all liability of the assignor. Any unauthorized voluntary assi�nment c�r suh-lease �hall he ��oid, and shall terminate this lease at the CITY'S option. Seetioa 25. �'ai��cr - No ofticet�, �I11��0}�c:t' ur a�c 'I11 l)f tl�e C`IfI�I' has the po��er, rigllt or authority to waive any of the conditions or provisions of this Agreement. The �vaiver of any breach of this Agreement shall not be held to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach. All remedies affarded in this Agreement or at law shall be taken and construed as cumulative, that is, in addition to every other remedy provided herein or by law. The failure of the CITY to enforce at any time any of the provisions of this Agreement or to require at any time performance by the LESSEE of any of the provisions hereof, shall be in no way construed to be a waiver of such provisions, nor any way affect the validity of this Agreement or an�• part hereof or the ri�ht of the GITY to thercaftcr enforce each and even� such provision. 10 Sectiun 26. Nlodilic;ation - Therc; shall be au m�ciificati�n of this A�;r�cme erce}�t in �ti7itin:.,�. exeruted �vith the same fornialities �f thi� }�resent instrument. Sectiu� 27. S:��r��hilit�. A. 11 is uncl�r5toud anil a�re:e by th� I'AIZTIES that if an}� ��art, teisn or pr��ision of this Agreement is held by the Court to be illegal, the validity of the remaining portions or pro��sions shall not be affected, and the rights and obligations of the PARTIES shall be construed and enforced a� if this .A�reeme did not cc�ntain a��rticl�lar ��trt. term or �I'O�"i�lOIl I1tIl� ll� b�� iil� alid. }3. If it should appear that any� part, temi or pru��ision hereol 1S 111 C:Ol1t�ICj ��ith any statutory provisions of Washington, then the part, term, or provision hereof which may conflict therewith shall be deemed inoperative and null and void insofar as it may� be in conflirt there«�ith, and be deemed to modifi� tu conform to surh statut�n� �ro��isions. Seetion 28. Land Use Action -"I'he LESSE� shall c�mply with all provisions of the Findings and Order in the Matter of Reviewing the Administrative Action of the Spokan� County Zoning Adjuster Decision to Approve Conditional Use Person No. CUE-5-83: Splash-Down, Inc., dated May 16, 1983, c�r �u�h l�tI1�1" ��117C� u�c COI1C�1�IclI1S CeC�llli't',Cj in conjunction with the use of the Premises. Seetion 29. Time of t11e Essence - Tirll� i� c�f tl�c �`�ec�ce c�f each �lil� c'1'�i'�' �I'(��'l�l��il �lt'ft'1i1. 5ection 3U. �11 ��'riting �'ontaiiled I Ier�ir� - A. This Agreement contains a11 the ternls and conditions agr�ed upon by thc PARTIES. No other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agxeement shall be deemed to eaist or to bind any of the PARTIES. In the event any language in an attachment which has been made part of this Agreement conflicts or appears to conflict with this document, it is expressly agreed by the parties that this �u� Agreement shall control in the resolution of any such disputes. B. The LESSEE has read and �u�derstands the whole of the above Agreement and now states that no presentation, promise or Agreement not e�pr�ssccl in ttlis Acre�mcnt has been made to induce the LESSEE to enter it. Section 31. Exhibits — A. Insurance certificates. B. Findings and Order in the Matter of Reviewing t�ie Administrative Action of the Spokane County Zoning Adjuster Decision to Approve Conditional Use Person No. CUE-5-83; Splash-Down, Inc., dated May 16, ] 983. 11 Ii�` WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES ha��c caused this Agreement to be executed on the date and year set for above. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY: SPI_.ASH-DOV�T1 CONCESSIONS, IIvC.: Dave Mercier City Maaager Name Title: Tax 1I) No. A"I :�PPRUVI:U AS TO FURI�-1: Christine Bainbridge. �'it�� Cl�rk (_)ffice c�f the C'it}� Attorne�� 12 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 12, 2009 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information � admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Western Dance Association 2009 Contract Update GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN N/A BACKGROUND The City has been working with the Western Dance Association on a new contract. Their existing contract, which expires May 31, 2009, was originally through Spokane County. The Association is not seeking any major changes from their existing agreement. This agreement has allowed for a good working relationship between the City and the Association. The Western Dance Association is in agreement with the proposed contract. Contract Hiqhliqhts: -Contract term is a ten-year contract with two five-year renewal options. -Lease payments to be $500.00 per month for the ten-year period. -Lessee responsible for paying Leasehold Excise tax. -Lessee continues to pay for all operating expenses and fees. -City retains usage of dance hall for programs. -Remainder of agreement is similar to previous agreement. OPTIONS: Advance contract to May 26, 2009 consent agenda OR Provide additional direction to staff. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consensus to place the Western Dance Association contract on the May 26, 2009 consent agenda for approval. BUDGET/FINANClAL IMPACTS: Revenue to City. STAFF CONTACT: Michael D . Stone, Director of Parks and Recreation ATTACHMENTS: Draft Contract �� . ! � J � . . � � . � � �\ 1 -� , '•�. ( i ' '�� i � � � . \ � , t � � � `' i 1 � . � \ I i1i1.5 :�l�1tl:L�1�.:7 i, iila�l� �lii� c:►it�i�� tiil� i�i�} u1 .IIIII� �UU�i, t�y aii�'. betvveen City of Spokane Valley, a political subd.ivision of The State of Washington. having offices for the transaction of business at 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite I06_ Spokane Valley, Washington 99206, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and Westem Dance Association of Spokane, a non-profit organizativn having ofFices for the transaction of business at P.O. Box 3052, Spokane, Washington 99220, hereinafte; refened to as "LESSEE," jointly hereinafter referred to as the "PARTIES." WITNESSETI-I: VVHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of RCW 35A.1 l.020, a city may lease or sell any park property, buildings or facilities surplus to its aeeds, or no longer suitable for park purposes; and WHEREAS, a certa.in portion of Sullivan Park was previously declar�d surplus tu the present and foreseeable need of Spokane County by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County; and V�rHEREAS, the recreational dance hall located at 1901 North Sullivan Road, Spokane Valley, Washington was originally constructed by the Western Dance Association of Spokane, pursuant to a Lease Agreement executed on the 30�' day of September 1958, however such facility vested in the Spokane County upon ternlination of said Agreement on the 29` day of September, ] 993; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 99-0454, the Board of County Commissioners authorized execution of the Sullivan Park Dance Hall Lease Agreement with the Westem Dance Association of Spokane pursuant to which the Western Dance Association leased a portion of Sullivan Park for a period of ten (10) years for westem d�nce activities and related purPoses; and WHEREAS, ownership of Sullivan Park. incllldin� the recreati�nal dance ha>> transferred to the Cit}� upon incorporation in 20�3. tiOW THE�tEFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual prumises s�t turti hereinafler and as provicl � � � � � - � � � . � T � , ; � , . , : � - - , _ mutually agree as fol low � �i��"1'I(1\ �'fl. l � �t�l�.l@ ( � ��i> I't i;E'i>�� I I ,, . : ,, � r � . � .,.. J ; : , l , � � 11L �1 i� �L�1:�`1 1�� llll L,i_�._'1..1 ,. ��'I�l� �� i.L l.i..�� ..1�1 Ll!:1\lill`_�li_ ll`i"i. �1'r��.�i:�:`�_1. �ertain real property� located in Sulli��an P�rk, ��kane Va11ev, VVashin�ton and le�all� dc�crihec� a� fnlln« :�.. � . i A portion of land, being approximately one and one-half (1 %2) acres, located South and V�1est of a point approximately 175 feet South of the North property line of the property hereinafter described and appr�ximately 250 feet West of the center line of Sullivan Road, said above portion located within the following described property: �I'he following portions of Government Lots 8 and 9 in Section 11, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M., in the County of Spokane and State of Washington, describcd as follows: Beginning at the Southeast comer of Section 11, Township 25 North, Ran�e 44 East, V��.M., thence North 0 47' West 925.08 feet alon� the East line of Section 11; thence North 55 ° 50' West 36.60 feet to the Westerly right-of way line of Sullivan Road and the True Point of Beginning; thence North 55 50' West 916.30 feet; thence North 89 13' East 751.04 feet to the Westerly right- of-way line of Sullivan Road; thence South 0 47' East 524.91 feet along the Westerly right-of-way line af Sullivan Road to the True Point of Beginning. Hereinafler reicrred to as the "Premises" Cor the purpases oi' ��estern ciance activities pui on by the LESSEE or sponsored by the LESSEE and related to western dance activities. during daytime and evening hours on weekends and ONLY after 6:00 p.m. on weekdays. Provided, it is understood that the continuance by tbe LESSEE of the support and sponsorship of activities set forth in Attachment "A" by the various clubs that make up the LESSEE, scheduling them for certain times and dates with them contribucing to the expenses of maintenance and upkeep, heat, lights, etc., of the Premises, is a proper use of the Premises. LESSEE needs city permission to use prior to 6:00 p.m. on weekdays. "I�he LESSEE agrees t�lat ihe GITY may administer and conduct any activities on the Premises during daytime hours of 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on weekdays. CITY agrees that such activities will be restricted to those that will assure maintenance, care, and safeguarding of the dance floor. The Premises include the recreational dance hall, storage building at the rear of the hall and the carport area on the south side of the hall. Tbe LESSEE shall additionally be entitled to the non-exclusive use of the parking lot east of tlle hall and the natural landscape arens around the perimeter of the structures, during the term of this Agreement. The C1TY will ensure that the Premises are left in neat, clean and orderly condition and that the recreational dance hall is secure at the conclusion of eacll such activity session. SECTIOI�' N0.2 TERMS ANll CONDITIUNS The t�rn� of this Agreement shall commence on the 1 S ` day� of June 2009, a.nd shall run for ten (10) years, this Agreement at the mutual option of the parties, may be rene��ed for up to two (2) additional five (5) year ternis. ragc 2 of9 I I � F+�r �d i�Y c�r�ider�ti+�n v:� t�e u�� +�� Pr��ris�s � set f�r�h ��rein, #he LE��E� �hall �a�P �h� �c�llt�� n c�r �ef�r� the �'�' �f`�ach n�+�r�th fr�r th�� n�c�r�th. �"ir,�t y��r t� en� €�f I.,�a�e ........................�......a.....$S�lD.�O� per n�c�nth �'he p�a�.i�� agr�e tc�, reariew� �s �eas� t�mc�unt �fd�er �.en � � �1� y��rs. �I1 ��e p�y ment� �h�ll b+� su�j�ct tc� a��5.��? l�t�e ��e� c�u� with th� f�al�c�v��ing n€��.� ��ym�ni. Payn��nt� sl��.11 b� ��ns��d��e� l�te if tt��}► �r� n�t r�c�i�r�d by t��e City� c�� pakar�� '��i��y ha�ing �f�ic�s �t � � ��17 �a�t �"pr�gu�e Ave��, �uite 10�, ��ankane �`�,11��, ��i��tnr� ��O�i. Pay �rrz�r�ts p��t ��r�e�l b�fc�r� �uc�i �i�t� sh�Il b� c+�n�id�r�� r�cei�r+��d tin��y. �E�C'�'I�N ��. �; L111��..�►�1�E I�wc�n,� �h� �e�i+�d c��' t�i� A,�r��:r��n�, �ie �.E�S�� shall �carr�• ar�� :eep in �c�r�.�, dt its �al� ��r�e � CQI�lI1��I"Gl�� Il�d"81 I1��1I1t� ir�sa�r�c� �olic�� witt� t�e minirnu�r� lirr�its �f �1,�}�{��} p+�r c�cc�urr�nee with ��2,�D�C�,0��1 a�gt+��at� f�� c�dity in�u.�yy and �I,f��,f1��} p�c� c��u� �o� prt�pert�r d��,ge. '�a��cl pc��i�y ��,�.11 b�e �.�vr�tt�n }�y � r�li�b�� i�s�tr�c� cn�-npar�y �r ��mp�ni�s and �h�ll ��n��e �l�at s�id �c�li�y sh�li nat b� c��eled, rr�a�eri�11�� +��n�;�d c�r nQt r�n��;d ��ithe►ut ��irty (�Cl� days Fr�� nvt��e ih��o�� ta the (�I��'. `t'�� 'IT'� r��e�r�� t�� i�ht t� a��rc�� th� i��';� ��su.�anc� �arrier(s�. �e �i�Y sha�l �+� nar�� as � adciit�c��.�i narx��c� ir►s��d i� �1 su�h p��i�� an� th� L��'�� k��l� prvvic��1 th� �IT`� with ��rtifi�c� r��i�� ,�' ��i� �c�n��ra�� t� c�n��n�c�rtt�nt �f �z�� f tl�� Pr�t�is��. The L�S��E ��all �r�vic�e a�l� �ir� insurance �n p�rsc�n�l �►r�p�� t�iat t�� S�E rnu�r�es �� he P�c�e�i��es �nd a �asu��y� �swr�c� d��ir�d �y �E�S�� bath �t �h� s�i� e�p��.�� ` �y�� and t�l� �'I�� ha111��:r� n� r��pon�ibilifi�� 'h�ts��r therefor�. `1'I�� :1 I Y��surr�c�s re��r�n�i�il�ty� tar pr��;�t�• d��gc� t�r bui��n�, rc��, ��11� ��n�l fc�und�tit�r� �f th� r�cr�ati�n�I �dar�c� h�l. In additi+�n, the �IT'� ��e�� tc� irademni�'y ar�d ��d ha�e�s t�e ,L�S�EE �c�t� any liabi�i�y far b�dily �ju� �ccL�rring tc� �n�� parti�i��t� in �vs� acti�riti�� ir��tly ��minist�r�� b�� t)�� 'IT�' �r�ing ats weekd�� s�s�i��s, �SE�TI[�1� NCI. _�: Ir�derY��ii��a��n and Hc�ld H�n��ss. LES�EE s�l�i �.�f��ad, i�c��n.�fy, ar�d �c��t ��l�ss �� 'i�"�� t� c��'�c��rs c��:i�i�s, e�.p�� a�d �rc�le�nt�� r�m and ag�ir��t �.n� and ail cl�irns, ��its, ��t�c�ns or lia�aili�ies f�r injury c�r �.��h �f a�y p�r�t�r�, �r ��x i+�� u� dar��e to gr��ert�, w�ic}� �u•�� o�t +��' LE:��EE's use �f Pr��uis�s�, �r f`rv�n th� ca�ndu�t v� L��E,E's b�ssin�ss, �r �r�►m �� a��ti�ri�, vv,�r� ar thin� �i�n�, ��r�m�tt�d, �r sui��3 t�y L.E��EE �. �� E�out �� 'ret�i�e�� a�c+e�t �r�1y �u�h ina u�°y c�.� d�rna�e as sh�11 h��r� b��n c�ccasi��ed �� the sc�l� ne��i�enc� �a�'the �'IT'�'. ��CTI�I� 1�+I�. � , (]W�E�I-�I�'' �F Il"V�PIt+�"V'�11�E�[�I`� �� r"�n�� mprc�r� �er��n�s and p�t��ar��r�� ures i��i� c�� la�:�c� �n the �'r��tais�s �} Ls��SE}� �iur�n� th� �ern� crfthis 1'�gr�em�nt shall �e �nd ren�air� the p�°��erty �f`the �IT�'. �E+�TI[]N� 1'�i�, b Z`��II�ATION �n ��i�ion tc� all �ther r�g�t� a�� rem�rli�:s �vl�u�h ��e ��i�� agf 1��ve ��re�n c�r �t l��w�, t,�e Partie� rn�!�� terrr�in�te this �i,�r�em�nt a,� foll��: �4. �� L��SC�: T�is A�reern�nt m��r be terrnin�t�c� 1��F t�� u�� 1$U �d�y:� vvTiti�n nc�tice �� t�� +�;it�� -ith�ut c�us�. �. �� rr��: ��) This ��r��r��t li�a�r b� t�rri�in�:t�c� 1�� th� ��t�� ot Sp�kti�t�c:� �f��ll�y upun un� �. �) y�e�tr ��rritten n��c�� t� t�� I_�ESS�E �►��itl�c��.�t ��. �?� This ��r��ment m�� termin�tec� �.�� th� C'I��' up�on fi�T� ��} �a�� vritt�n nc�ti�e to th� L��E c�r� �h� h�p�p��in� of any �ne� af �h�� fc�llc�wi,r�� e�r��ts: a. Th� ��ult ��' t�e LFS�EE in the ��r�orrnan�� a��' any ��rms, ��nditi+�ns �� c�v�r��ts h�r�in ��equYxc��i tc� b� ��rf��r��d ��t �h� �� an� �h� f��r� c�f t�i� I.��E tn re�n�dy �uch c��`ault in a p�e�iv�l c��' thirty �� c��}�� af�.er �r��ei�� fr�� T� �f wr��t�en �otic,+� t� �errzedy �h� sar��. P'rc��id�e�d, ho�e�°er. th�t �c� �ZC�tic� af ��r�zinati�r� �� l�er�ir� prvvid�cd �ia�.11 b� c�� a�y f'+�r�e r�r �f�e�t i� �h� L�S�� s�all �a�v�e r��ediec� th� default p.ri�r t� t�le +�x�it"�ti�r� �f su�� l�iri� per�od �r if �I�� n�.tG�rc �#` s�� cie�'�uit i� s�aclt th�t �a p�r;��d in ��cess �f t�i�ty �3�i�� days i� r�e��ss,ar�r iii c�rde�r �'ar � L�� t� �ur� s�c�l ci�faul�, �n� tlie L�S�FF ��1a.11 h��•�.} c�c�nen�e� t� curc: tt�i� cl��'�t�lt �nd sh�l� �ilig�.�tl}� +��niin�� its �f�or�s �c� �Qrr�� suc� d�fault. It� �u�ch e�:��t, th� �,F.'��I:�` sl��ll 1��F�e �uc�� ti�n�e �.� i� �e��a�naL�ly r��uir�� tc� +��r�.ti t�i� �ei`��tlt, ��T°IUN �Y(�� 7 : 1�V,�S"�� ,A►.�T:D 1�Ui��N�'� PR��I�ITED I�uring th� terrn c�f this Agr��rt��nt, t��r� L��E �h�ll �c�m�l�� vit� all app�i��ble l��vs �f��ting th� prer��ise�, t�ie l��e��h of �� n�i�ht r�esu�t in ar�yt pen�It}f on th� �I�s�' �� kc��#eit��c� c�f �� C�I�'Y'� titl� t� tll�� par�rr�is�s. Th�e L��E ��ail n�t can�mit, �� suf�F�� t� }�� rnmitt�d, �ny �v�te �n t�e pr�mis�s +�r ��ais�+��. S�E�CT�CI��' �[t�. 8 1�T�'�'I��:� �.I� ��tices, c�emaa�d�, c�r �th��r wTitiri�� in thi� .�►��e��li p��a�f��ec� t+� �e �iv�er� �� a�e �r ��t, �or �vhi��i m.�� i��en, vr rr��de or ��r�� 1�� eith�� p�r�,r her�t� �� r�ti�+��, shat� �� d��m�d ta have �+�� f��II�F �i��, c�r rn�+de c�r ��t ►�her� rr�a�l� in �iti�� an+d de��ite� r��3�� i in the United States Mail, certified, postage pre-paid and return receipt requested, and addressed as follows: To CITY: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Parks & Recreation Director 2426 North Discovery Plac� Spokane Valley, VVashingt��n 99? 16 "I�c� I.F��(�.. �t�'�5I ll�i�� .a��_��l.a�i�lON ��I� �I�Oh,��NL: PO Box 3052 ��kan�. �'�'ashin�tc�n 99�?f► 1 �1c �l�i�I��» l�) ��'IIIC}1 �1111 11��11C�. �1�Illaila C)1' �.tllti' Ul�i�l' �1'1'lilli�� 111�1� �)c: <_'.1� CIL ��r Ill�l�� (lI' - - � - � sent to any party as provided far herein ahcive, ma�� be changed b}r «Titten notice gi��e�1 by such party as provided for herein aho��e. ��:('1'IC)� '.ti�f). 9 ili�:}':�IIZti l h� I.I�;��f �! tliruu;�l�uut tli� t�rcu ul� clli� ��r��c:il1�►11, ��t it� u��n �u�t an�i ��i�huut any expense to the CITY, keep and maintain the premises, including the recreational dance hall, slorage building and carport, all improvements and fixtures of every kinci which may be a part thereof, and all appurtenances thereto, including sidewalks adjaceni thereto, in good, sanitary and neat order, condition and repair, except as provided for t�� the contrary herein. The CITY shall not be obligated to make any repairs, replacements. or renewals of any kind, nature, �r de�crirti�n. «•h�t��e�•er t� the rremise�. �r an� ��iilclin�i� ��r ir.��rc l}l�'f��i1. .�'�11� �i�1�l��llli�ll�-, 1'��1�.��lll�ili� ;�1� l��'ll�'��;1��. t�l:' [�>i:l� �'�_��i ti�i 1'.�ll�'�l �'�.��'��}� '� � .f !f �ll �Il,l�l receive prior written ap�r��1 ��1� ci�e c'[ I 1�. The LESSEE shall provide for snow removal tTOm th� w�alking areas K�hich the LESSLI: }�as the right to use under the terms of this Agreement. The CITY shall additionall}� remove snow accumulation from the roofs of the recreational hall, attached carport and storage building as necessary to prevent structural dama�c: and ice d�uiis. The CITY may inspect the Premises at any reasonable time for the pu� ot' re��ie«-in�T compliance h`� the T.F,SSF_.F with the terms of this Agreement. SECTIU�' NO. 10 LILN� The LESSEE shall keep the Premises tree and clear fom� all mecha��ics' and materialmens' and c�ther liens from work or labor done, ser performed, materials, Pa�e > c�f 9 i appliances, teams or power contributed, used or furnished or to be used in or about the Premises for or in connection with any operations of the LESSEE, or any alteration, improvement, repairs, or additions which the LESSEE ma}� make or permit or cause to be made, or any work or construction by, for or permitted by the LESSEE on or about the Premises. SFCTI01�' NO. 11 UTILITIES 'I'he LESSEE shall initiate, co�tract for and obtain in its awn name and fully and promptly pay for all electricity, beat, lights, power, telephone service, garbage and all other public and private utilities of every kind fumished to the Premises throughout the term hereof. LESSEE shall be responsible for the purchase of building supplies for janitorial rest rooms, kitchen and similar uses. SECTiON NO. 12 : CnMPLIANCF �'VIT��i I..FASF.:�-IOLD EXCISE TA,I' The I.,I��SSI:I: hereby� acknc��ledaes that it is resPonsible for payin� the `'I,easehold l;xcise Ta�c," as set forth by chapter 82.29A RC W, as now or hereinafter amended, which is applicable to this Agreement. The LESSEE shall be not only be solely responsible for paying such tax, but shall also be responsible for representing itself in any challenge to the amount of such tax that the Washington State Department �f Re��enue determin�s i� dti�� or ail�� p�nalt�� associated ��ith the tax. 'I'lie L�SS�,� a�;r�es to pr�mptly pay� �vhen due all taxes, rates, char�es and assessments. special or otherwise and public charges of every kind and nature which may bc lawfiill}� imposed �r �issessed in an}� wati� on the LESSEI� �vith reference to the Premises. The L�SSE� s}lall also comply �vith and abide b}� all federal, state, couilt��, il�unicipal and other govemmental statutes, ordinances, laws and regulations affecting the premises, the improvements thereon, or any acti��iri� conducted on or in such Premises. SEC�i'ION NO. 13 : NnN-LIABILITI' OF C'I�I'ti' The CIT�C' shall not be liable in any manner for any loss, injury or damage incurred by the I,ESSEE from acts of theft, burglary, or vandalism, committed by either identified or unidentified parties. The LESSEE shall be responsible for providing, and all expenditure� relating thereto, any security precaution that the LESSEE deems necessary to protect the premises and all impr�vements thereon. The LESSEE shall be solely responsible for providing, and all expenditures relating to, any safety and security precautions that the LESSEE deems necessary for the safety of the personnel, guests, employees, patrons, or users of the prenuses, or property of the LESSEE located on the premises. The LESSEE shall implement securiri� measures sufficieni to secure the Premises after hours and prevent unauthorized use. SECTION NO. 14 INSPECTION Pagc t� �f 9 �h� L.��;E s�i�ll n��e ��ilabl� ta� th�e �'IT�' c�r its du�y �uthc�rized r�pr�s��ta�i��: �t �� tirn�e frorn Mc��i��= thr�au�l� �ri�a�r, d�r�ng narrn�l ��n�� ht��r�, �11 recc�r�ci�, b�c��:� c�r perEir��n� in�+�rin�t�vn �f��icb the ��S'��E �h�ll ��v�e ��p� in �c�r��ur�ct�vn with �}�i� A�,r��rr��nt �?nd �hi�t� t1�e C"I�"Y rr�a�r he requir�d Y�yr �a� �c� �nclud� c�� r��e part �C ��.�itin,� �r�c��iur�s c�r ��c�it trail�. ��TI(�l�t N(]. �.� �v'�P�1�1E �"1'Ilji.�LA�'I[71'�T `l�s A�.r��rr�ent h�.,� 1�� d �hall be ��nstru�c3 �� i�g beer� r��c�e �nd d�Ii�Fer�ed ��git��in tll� ��te o�' ��hi��tc�� and �� i� rt��xtiaally und�rs#c��d and a�r��d t�}�� .�a.c� p�rf th�er�t� t�a� �i� ,��re�r��n� �h�lI k�e ��e�ned i�y ��+� i��►�� of ��e State �f �J�'a.�l�ingtr�n� ht�t� �s t� int+�r�ret.�tic�n and �e�fvr�n�c�. �un� �,��ic�n ar law, ��uit �n equifi�F. ,�udi�i�i prv�eedin� f�r the c�t�r+c��e:�t t�f this Ag�re��.ent nr �n�F pr��i��vn �3e�ec�f shail be i�.s�i�ut�+� and �n�i�t�in�d c�nl�t �n ��• +�f �he �c�u�� f c�r,��t�nt �a�.r��di�tian xn �pok�ne �'�our�t�r. �►�Vash�n��no �E�'��'1[lN �[]�. ��G A�51�1'+��" E��c� ��I;y t� t�� ,re��t L t�x��;elv��, th�� p��rs, suec.��c�� cu�c�rs.. �dr�unis�r�tnrs, an+3 a��ig�rs t� th� c�t��r party �of thi� zhgr��m�r�t a�d t� the p�t�F's �uc��s�sc�rs, �xecui�r,s, at�nir�ist�ats�rs au� assig�s �f ��h �o��r p�� th r��ect t� �a�� t�rrrr�, cvn�iiti�ns �nc� ec��er�ant� �et �c�r�h ��in. �� .E�� tn�y nc�t s�b��t t�e Pr�mi��s: �1lc�w� i�5 �rs� �i�r �ny +�th�r p��r�+ar� �� r��it�t, n�r` �s��,n, ir�sf�� in ��h��e �ar pa� its int�re�t in this t��err��n� ��t�aut th� sa.r�� '�ein� �rs� ,�ut�ic��i��I in writiug �� th� �IT�'". In �h� +��e�t af` � �s�i�e�t, tl�e �ssi�� shall ��t�ne aIl Ii�biitty� �f �e ��i�,n�r. An� 1lI721�1��7i7r1Z�� '�'O�ll�l�c'lt'�' c�� i��ac��untar�,� a��i�nr�tent c�� u�-I�� h�1� �� vc�id, ar�d sh�11 �ermina#� ih.is L��s� �t tl�� Ifi'4''''s r��icrn, I�r�vid�e�� th�t i� i� �nde�°�t�a�d ih�� the �ant�r�u�n�� l�y t1�.e I�E��E ��' t��e �suppo�t an�l sp�nso��up �f ��ta��t�� p�r�u�n� tn �.tt��m�nt "�i►" b�� .h� �rari�u�s cl�bs th�� nz�ak� up �.he A�s�v��tic�n, �c�ie�ulin� t�� f�r ��in times �t� dat�s ��i� th�m �t�ntributi�,� t�o t�i� ��p��s c�f maint�n�r�c� a�d c��ep, ��at, li��is, �t�., c�� the Fremi�e�. d�ae� n�� arn�ur�t t� c�r cc�n�i�t +�f sub��li�g �� r+�vid�d �r� t�is �ect�ic�r�. ��+CTI�N �V�.17: '�''�iV�� '� c�ffc�r, ��rn,�lo�y+��, a,�� v�r �th+��i�+e of t}�� I`��` �as tl�� p��er, ri��t or autl��rit�f tc� ww�iv� an� �f t�a� cflnditions �r p�o�►i�zc�n.� c�f this ��r�er��ez�t. �� vai�:er o#' �n� E�re�rch ��' t�i� ��r��r��nt �h��l nc�� e h�ld to be �a wa�ve� �f any c�t�er c�r su�ser�u��n� bsr��aa+�h. �►11 ��m�cli�� #"�rd��i in this A►�reem�r�t c�r at la��T shall '�e t,a�.+��. �n+� c�nstru�ed a� c�.tm�ul�ti�.r� tha� r�, in �c�di�i�n to �ve�� er reme€��r p�rovide� h�r�in �� y #he la�v. T�� °��r� �f t�� CIT�' ta �nf�r�� zt �n�r �ime, �.r►y of tt�e �r��vi�ia�� af this Agre�m�nt ar �v r�q�ir�. �t a�� tin�� p�rf�rrn�.n�e i�y th� L��'�E �f �ny� ��th� prc��ris�o�s �e��f� �hall �e �n �a �ay +cr�ns�ru�d t� b+� � v�v�.iver �+f su�h p�r�ov�s��n�, nc�r any �r�y aff��t th� �r�lidi�� t�f' t�is aA�re�m��t +�r �� p�k her�e+�f �r th� ri�ht af t��e CI'� �� th�r��k�er enf�r�� :�i �.� Eo ��'.�+ SLl��'1 �r�G'1fi1�I1. i�ag� 7 �f�+ � �S��GT�� t"�(]. 1�; �Vi(��I�ICA�CI()�d 'I'��.r� s��l� b� no rnoclifica��n c�f tl�i� A�r�err�ent, �ex�e�� in �i�ir��, ��ut�d ��i�t� the ��ne f�rm�lities �F �his �re�e��t ��strwnet�t. �5��F1 I�l'ri �(3. 1� 5��iA�ILIT lr' It i� �an��r�t�o�i �nd ��r��c� by� th� �a�r�i�s t��t �iT �� rt, t�rrx� �r pr��i�i�ar7 c�f` this �.grr��me�t �� h�lc� by tl�� +�c�u�t tc� b� ill��l, the ��ali�iiiy ��' the r��n�ini�g pv�ti�ar� �r �rc��is�c�ns �h�ll �o�t b�e ��'�c��d. �nd �e r'r�t� �nd abli�at�ans �� t�e ��i+�s s�all �� c��ns�ru�d �d e�#'c�rc�c� �� i�' tl�i� :��►�,r �ii�� n�t c•c,t�tai� � ��a �a4�t. �� r �rc��-x�ic�n 1�eid tc� l�� #a�i�. If i� ��ul� a��:�u- t�lat ��k �ar�, t�ri�� c�� ,�ru��i�ic�r� ��r�� is i� �c�ntlic�t �� u��r st�tutc�r}° ��i�i�ns t�t V��hin�tan, then #.�e �a�rt, ier�, c�c p�r+�vi�ic�n her��of �+r�i�� m�� ct�nflict tl�ere��ilh shail be c�e�n�e� inc�pc�r�tive, i�ull �d �•c��d ��f�r a� it n�� e in c+�nt�ict there��ith� �z��c� sl��lf h� +�e�xr4�d t€� rr��+�i��v t� c�nfc�r�a t� s�ic� s��utar�° �rovisic�r��. ��Gr�'I(�� i�Q. 2{l: �C)�'-i]I��:�IM1�A'T�� °1Al L.��'�� spe�if c��F ��re�s ti��t �t s�a�l ��m�rl�r wit� �all �p�lic��b�� +�d�ral �n� st�it� law� relati�� t� �aa�-�.i�c�ri�rYin�ti�n f�r �n�� pr��ran� �ar act��ity- eon�luct�d t�o� t] ��F �.�n t��.� �'r�rt�isc� ��Ti�l'ri iV�(l. 21� H�A�1�1G� �A11� s�ctiar� ��a�i��,� G��ae�.rin�; in �his �1�r�+�m�nt ha��e �� in�e�.�c� �c�l�l�� 3r c�i�y ��rpc��e �f c��►�ai�n� �d r�aciy-r��rence. �n �� va� dv th�yr �uur��rt tc�� an� s�'�a�l n�t b� ��med t�� ti�e, �invt c�r �xtend tl�� sc��e ar intent s�f th� s�ct3c�r�� t� ��hi�:�t t}�c;�+ �r�: . p�x�[�itun�. ��CTI(��I N+i�, ��. ��11�� (7�F T�� 1�'E �i�e t� +��` the ��ser�c� �i� �acY� and � v� r�� pr�ti� i�i�n I��i�. SF�TI�i� ��. 23 . e��..'V'��'R�TIP�GS �`C)I�'I't�il�IEi� ;��x�+I I`his ,�,,�;re��me�k �c�ntain� �11 th� term� �� c�a�r.�itic�r�s ��,r��:�i u�c�� l t��L Fares��. �i"�� th�r u��e;rstan�i�gs, c�ra1 �r cat��r�wis�, r�gardin� tI�� subj�ct n��tt�r n� t�.i� �1��r��r�t sh�ll h� de�m�d t� �x�st r�r tc� bind an�F c�f th� T'arti�s. `I'��c I��S�� s re��! anr� unc�erst,�n.�� 1�� hc��e �f tl�� k�c�v� 11�re�en��nt and nc��F �t�t�s tha.t n� r�prese�tt�tic�n, p�amis+e a�r a�gr�e�ent �,�t �e�gr��d ir� t.�i� ��;rc��Y�.�ilt h�� c��. r��e tc� i�c��e the LE�� ta� �nt�� i. ��iSa�C $ l�� `.) i SEC;'I'ION NU. 2�1 EXIiIBITS — .�1. In�ur.ir��c c�i IN ��'ITI�iCSS V1'HE�Z�;U�', thc 1':1I� I II�ti h�t�� u��i tlli� ,=� �I'Ct'II1�111 tu h� etic.�cuttc� on the date .ind ti�ear �et f�r �h��z. �'I I ti' c�T� �1�� h.�til ��.1I_I I�:��: �t E=� 1 I�l:ti I�:�'vc'f�: :��c ��'!:� I Ic)\: llave Mercier, City Manag�r Name Title: TaY IT) N�. __ A�l"1�L;51�: A�'�'KUV��ll A5 �I�U �-UK `� � . Chris�ine �3ainbridge, Git�� Clerk Oftice �f the C'ity Att�rnc:�• f';i'.;i `+ ul `� CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Councii Action Meeting Date: May 12, 2009 City Manager Sign-off: Itenn: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information � admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Allocation of Space at Spokane Valley Precinct Building GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Approved Precinct Building purchase on June 6, 2006: Approved revised Precinct Building lease agreement on August 28, 2007. BACKGROUND: The City purchased the Precinct Building from Spokane County in 2006. In 2007, the City paid off the remaining balance on the building. The new lease and maintenance agreements approved by both parties preserved the original occupancy rates of 56% for the City and 44°� for the County. In 2008, the County notified the City that it would cease to pay for the holding area, the rear garage, and several other shared areas beginning in 2009. The City is exploring other options for the use of these areas. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: N/A BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The decision of the County to discontinue payment on the jail holding area and decrease its occupancy rate from 44% to 15°/a will cause a decrease in revenue of approximately $102,000 for the fiscal year 2009. STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Koudelka, Senior Administrative Analyst ATTAC H MENTS 1 �..11��.t�� .�� .� �i ��' ��l�a�� a.�� '��ir��t ��i1�.i�� 9��an K.a��iellca, ��ni��r �A�r�inistrat��v� �nalyst 1�+1��r 1 �, �� .��[�1�' C)� ��C��I1� ��.��J' �I ��1�� 1.�1�.�1�'1� � �+DO1 - �'urc�a.ss�d �� +�kar�� v. fc�r $1,2��1,{��Q, o �� -Remodel�ed f�r $1,�U4,� l7, o �O�D� y �it}r a►f �pokar�� `��ley (�U�V} be�,an le�sing �+�% �f �uildiri�;, �� {�D� - Cit�� urc��e�d huildin�. �c�unty b��,� l�sin� 44��`�, c��' �ui�ciin�. ��(}�7 -�CityF pa�d a��'�" r�ma%nir�� amou�t +��c� t� �C�unty. [� 2+D�� —��u.�� n�t�fi�d �i� �hat it u�a►�]d n� ��ng�ea� p�y �c�r th� hc�ld�n� �r�e� �nd �t�� area� �rev�.nusly de�i�,n�.t�ed C��unty a��ea�. ��C�(�9 � Cc��.nty� r��d�uc�d �o��c�p�� rv� 44% t� 15�/Q. � �'ina.��1 I�pa�� o Le�s� �20+�� c�? $1�.�9 p�r square �vc�� 4�°�0 � �1�1�, ��4 ■ 1 �°,�� ,2�(� � I�i�f�r�ence = L�ss c�f ��?,2+�4 � I"v��n��er��c� �4�� ,`�'a $121,�}�� ■ 4��'� -� ��3.��? ■ � 5 ��'o � $1$,15 {� ■ �iffere�ce = �c�ss vf ��,C��{� ❑ �I'+at�� v��u� �.�ss f'c�r �'C�� = $10�,�'�� r _ . . . ' . _ __ _ ' . ._ - � � �I�l�.i�� i�}� �o�t �u� T�� o �c�c��i�n�� te��ir�;� of �E.T� �rre�tee�. �a �rc��,ti�r� us�s ��11 ��`f ��e �n�e d�y pe;� �� c� rr��1: �it�i ��a�� Vr�il�� c�b�.��rs. � - - -- - - - - - - � Future Use of Holding Area - Options ❑ Leased Office Space o Records/Property Storage o Court Related Services o Future Law Enforcement Needs Next Steps o Identify best options for use of holding area. o Acquire estimate of conversion for desired use options. o Select use and begin conversion ■ Identify conversion cost ■ Calculate expected revenue or cost savings ■ Begin use of vacant areas 3 �r� c�� c�� r�►��r R�+q��st fvr C+�ur��ci� l��ti+an Meeti��g �]a#e: �+i�y 1�, �Ot�� +�i�y M�n��er S�ign-t�ff: rt�e�n. �h+�ck a�l t�af app�ly: ,[� ��ns��t ❑ o��d �usir�ess ��u�r b�s�n��s� a pu�lic f��rin� � infc�rmatrcan � adrinin. rep�r� ❑ p��n�ding le�i�l�tion A�E�1qA IT�M "��T�.E. R��i�onal �'r�nspartati�on ��l/�RN�C�� L�4��SLAT�t��y PF��111t�US C�UNC�L A�TIC]�i TA41�E1�: �A+� �+G RUlJ � �: I'��yv�' Mu�svr� v�rifl �iv� �n u�dat� on th�� i�,�u� �� r�:t�i�n�� t��s�nspvrt�t�on. �PT��I��; RE+�C�IVIMENI]E[� AGTI+�N +OR MQ�T1D1�: E�L,1D+C��TII�INAr+ICIAL I�PA�T�`; �TAF�I��N��L C�NTA+�fi: �'la�rar I'�ur�sc�n ATTACF�M�[��: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 12, 2�09 City Manager Slgn-off: Item Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business � public hearing � information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legisiation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: ��linter Snow Remeval and De-icir.c� S aR�iCFS GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: On March 24, 2009 Council approveci b,y c�nsens�,s to move ahead with a two-step RFP for a private contract for winter services. BACKGROUND: The City received clarification from Bob Brueggeman, County Eng -�_�� -� -:�� May 4, 2009 stating that it was not the County's intention to develop the RFP for winter servi� �� -. for the City. Based on that understanding we are developing the 1 S� Step, Letter of Interest (LOI), which may help us in determining if there are interested private contractors who want to provide Winter Snow Removal and De-icing Services. The LOI is scheduled to be advertised �� late May. We will also proceed with the selection of a consultant to assist us in developing the 2" Step, a formal RFP, for the procurement for a winter service operation. The RFP will take �- 6 months to develop and several additional months to advertise, select and approve :-: contract. The contrac#or would then have to purchase the required equipment and gE � everything operational. The possibility of having a private contractor on board and ready ��:_, provide service by November is unlikely. As a result, we will contart the County Engin�Er to pursue negotiations for winter services. There may be a possibility as an emergency measure for this winter where we could obtain surplus plow/sanders form WSDOT, buy or lease an existing faci�ty that would have adequate shop and storage space for a winter operation and use a private contractor to provide operators and mechanics. If we were able to secure the facilities and equipment it would require a significant effort to purchase all the materials, supplies, and tools needed for the operation and to train and organize the operators for a full winter operation. We currently do not have a clear understanding of the procurement process required for this effort. We are discussing the details of this process with our Legal Department. The time requirement for procurement may make this option unachievable. We would need direction to move ahead on this plan immediately. OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT� Neil Kerst�n ATTACHMENTS Request for Letter of Interest (�1�1' 1' t)F o n� ae CITY OF SPOKANF, VALLF.�r' Pubtic Worlis Dep artment Letter of Interest (LOI) Public Works Winter Snowplowiog and ne-icing Services May 1 �, 2009 Publication dafes, 2009 and, 2009. SU B MITTAL DEADLIN E �:0O f':�1 ('lo�al timc), F�rida��. , �01)�) SUBMIT Original plus four (=�) duE�lirat� cc�pie5 UEL1VE�t TU: City of Spokane Valley Public Works Department 11707 E. Spra�ue Avenue, Suite lU6 �p��kan� Vallcv, �� '� -f- TABLE OF CONTEN"I�S SECTION DESCRIPTI4N PAG _F, REQUEST QUALIFICATIONS .................................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 PROJECTDFSCRIPTION .............................................................................................................................................. I PROJECTSCHEDULE ................................................................................................ .................... l SCOPEOF SERVICES .....................................................................................................................................................1 CONFIDENTIALITY � ....................................................................................................................................................... :. F4RMATAND BINDING ................................................................................................................................................? DELIVERY ....................................................................................................................................................................._.._ � �. -II- REQUEST' FUR LETTER OF IyTEREST 1NTRODUCTION: The City of Spokane Valley is s�liciting Letter5 ut Interest (LUI) ir�m c{ualified coniractors t��► pro��ide snow plowing and de-icing services for Cin� streets. The Lf1T i� n�t to he c�nstn�ed as �3 rc �n th� C'iri�'ti part to issue a subsequc�t Request f �r Prc� pos;�l f RFI' ). PRO.TECT DESCRIP'TICI,ti: (f�� c_ it} i; �l�i�r�•ntl� un��r ��_�ntra�t «iifl Spokan: c_'��u�tt`� t,� pr�_�� i�l� �n�>�ti r�F1��. :�n�] deicing services. Spokane Counry has terminated that contract effectivdJctober 15, 2009. The City is seeking a contract�� to provide cornplete snow and deicing services for all City streets. This service would require a 24 hour a day, 7 d�� ,, �veek operation on an as�—needed basis to maintain Citv streets at the required level of,er� i� �. PRO.TECT SCHEDULF: By October 16, 2009, the City� i»ust ha�c a sriu�� pl��in�a�c� cie-iciilg pruara►n. I�hi ir:i?i.�i ��1� �,.. ��.:�� ,� in;;�',_��: n<<_��.i �;� ��*� �rt1�•rr•t�1��,' c�r' 1l't }�;l�I� �,�,it�i ;1 ��' f:Clii ��:ir�•t{i� �� 1?� ��C fi,iitir�� •��, O1 �l 1.1\}�, ti(�OI'i�: Of�' �E�:lt� ICE:�: Term of contract: It is anticipatcd that this contract would be a�� !, � r�,i r� •�� I�-• _��.-' � acceptable performanceby the contractor. Bonding requirements: The contractor �i�ill b� required to maintain a ful l p�: � � � : � :: .. .� � . _ , . . � � � � � �� . i � ; � � amount of the annual contract. Insurance requirements: The contractor will be required to maintain, at a mini;r�:.�;� ,. ��r��_r�� ,.1 �-��,._�:,i i,,i>iiir� co��era2eof $1 milli�n per occurance. $2 million a��re�afe: �2 milli�n �rehicle liabil;� ; . ' .. ' , ��U:/1:111it'�' tll Uil(l1lC( f U�ItI'(1 1l'l \ lll': E iil ��iii(.t�� Itl�l� i��ll ;. . .. l.i ', ... _ guarantee to ensure that essential sen�ice will not be interrupted. Equipment requirements: Nine tandem-axle trucks �vith sanJ��r �,��it, aj��l ��i��..;i��, c.��1��►-��.�i� t,��1,� �� iti, 2000 gallon (iquid de-icing units; six graders with wings; two front end loaders; other miscellmieous equipme�� necessary for a compl�te ��•inter sno�v plowing/deicing operation. Additionally, during extreme snow events, tli�� con� may be required to bring on up to six additional graders to provide service in residential area�. Equipment , �;i� i,.• ��.,.,,� r;, ,h.�. ;�, :� i,�. ,;,:� `S .I ,;�,�,�-„ �f n ; ,t'�I�- : �,,: ; ,�,�-,-.,;;, n f,f� ;�.,� �,;t,,:_. operations. Communieations and A�"L tracking: The contractor will be required t� prv� : . . � � . enabie the City to communicate with the contractor and monitor contractor activities. Additionally. all equiprnen will have real time Automatic Vehicle Location (AVI:) trackin� svstemst� allowthe ('�� . � � activities of contractor eqi, �,� ��. Requirements for equipu►.�ut lll.ilil�l'ii:lilCt'. 1'l'ill'li.i� .itlt� I'E'1)I:il'l'I1il'111: I �i� ��;llif.i�i�%i �� l�l C�� i:�iiiil:�l i� follow a maintenance and replacement schedule similarto the Statc nf �Vashin�t�n I�epartment �f Tr�n�p�rtati�n' : maintenance and replacement program for comparable equipme� : Staffing requirements: The contractorwill be required to ha�c ��ityu�t� �t:�tlin� t� l��n,�!. �;��r:�:��.:, t� r..;�: above equipment on a 24 hour a day basis, 7 days a week as needed t�� maintain rit` �tre rt:. Pto��inQ!deicin� route�: �ee the attach�d �n��- P1��«� Pri��ritt� '�1��, ��'( ) �'ll�)_I}f) — (�llf��i� `�1 ��r��•.� `l!'L�1 �\1;i!I}l�''.l,�lii�' ��f1.!��ti l��:i{� ��,�"`. � , —�r -, Pei•f�rmance requiremcnt;. Reyuirements for t�pE�s, yuantitiesanel stor��e uf c�c�irinh m��terials Facility i•equirements: I�he contractor «�ill be required to ha�•e ad�quate facilities for storage ��f �C�UIpi1lE;ilt materials� and for servicing and maintaining equipment. The facility �ti�ill be required to be located within the City of Spokane Valley. CONFInF.NTIALIT�r': Contra�t�rs respunding to thi� L�tt�r� ol� Intcrest (LO1) are hereby put on notice that Spokane Valley ��ill re�ard submitta�s as public records which will be available for public inspection and/or copying, subject to the public disclosure requirements of RCW Chapter 42.56. If these terms are not acceptable, r� contractor should not respond to this LOI. FURMAT: The LOI should contain the company's history and experience. It should brietly describe your ability to provide this service including w�hether you have existing equipment and facilities or if you would intend to purchase ne��• equipment and/ar facilities and any otl�er information that would assist the City in detennining if there are private contractors that are interested in provi�ing this service for the City. DELIVERY: LOI's must be received on tiie day,date, time and location stipulated on the cover sl�ect. � RF(� #09-00 — Public «'orks Street �laintena�ice Servic�s Plan �'age 2 of 2