Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2016, 02-23 Regular Meeting
AGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING FORMAL FORMAT MEETING Tuesday, February 23, 2016 6:00 p.m. Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers 11707 E Sprague Avenue Council Requests Please Silence Your Cell Phones During Council Meeting CALL TO ORDER: INVOCATION: Pastor Chris Brummett, Valley Fourth Memorial Church PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: ROLL CALL: APPROVAL OF AGENDA: INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: n/a COMMITTEE, BOARD, LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS: MAYOR'S REPORT: PROCLAMATION: n/a PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those on this agenda as action items. (Action items include public hearings, and those items under NEW BUSINESS. Public Comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.) When you come to the podium, please state your name and city residence for the record and limit remarks to three minutes. 1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. Proposed Motion: I move to approve the Consent Agenda. a. Approval of claim vouchers on Feb 23, 2016 Request for Council Action Form, Totaling: $2,663,113.24 b. Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending February 15, 2016: $384,907.10 c. Approval of February 2, 2016 Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session d. Approval of February 9, 2016 Council Meeting Minutes, Formal Format e. Approval of February 16, 2016 Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session NEW BUSINESS: 2. Motion Consideration: Comprehensive Plan Contract — John Hohman [public comment] 3. Motion Consideration: Mayoral Appointments, Lodging Tax Advisory Committee —Mayor Higgins [public comment] 4. Motion Consideration: Approval of City Hall Plan — John Hohman [public comment] 5. Motion Consideration: Historic Preservation — Deputy Mayor Woodard [public comment] Council Agenda 02-23-16 Formal Format Meeting Page 1 of 2 PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those on this agenda as action items. (Action items include public hearings, and those items under NEW BUSINESS. Public Comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.) When you come to the podium, please state your name and city residence for the record and limit remarks to three minutes. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: 6. Comprehensive Plan Existing Conditions Report — Lori Barlow 7. SCRAPS Update — Mark Calhoun, Morgan Koudelka 8. Sidewalk/Snow Removal — Cary Driskell 9. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins INFORMATION ONLY 10. Department Monthly Reports 11. Third Avenue Preservation Project CITY MANAGER COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT General Meetinj' Schedule (meeting schedule is always subject to change) Regular Council meetings are generally held every Tuesday beginning at 6:00 p.m. The Formal meeting formats are generally held the 2nd and 4th Tuesdays. Formal meeting have time allocated for general public comments as well as comments after each action item. The Study Session formats (the less formal meeting) are generally held the 1st 3rd and Stn Tuesdays. Study Session formats DO NOT have time allocated for general public comments; but if action items are included, comments are permitted after those specific action items. NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical, hearing, or other impairments, please contact the City Clerk at (509) 921-1000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made. Council Agenda 02-23-16 Formal Format Meeting Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: February 23, 2016 Department Director Approval: El Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ['new business ['public hearing AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Following Vouchers: VOUCHER LIST 02/05/2016 02/05/2016 02/09/2016 02/11/2016 02/12/2016 02/12/2016 02/17/2016 02/17/2016 02/18/2016 VOUCHER NUMBERS 37611-37658; 128160030 37659-37666 5390; 5398-5401; 5410; 37667-37668 6522-6528 37669-37704 37705-37742; 205160019 37743-37752 37753-37777; 212160219 5402, 5412, 5413, 5415, 5416; 37778 GRAND TOTAL: TOTAL AMOUNT $1,791,279.13 $745.44 $309,663.23 $813.00 $114,644.12 $272,429.96 $14,697.76 $80,566.87 78,273.73 $2,663,113.24 Explanation of Fund Numbers found on Voucher Lists #001 - General Fund 001.011.000.511. City Council 001.013.000.513. City Manager 001.013.015.515. Legal 001.016.000. Public Safety 001.018.013.513. Deputy City Manager 001.018.014.514. Finance 001.018.016.518. Human Resources 001.032.000. 001.058.050.558. 001.058.051.558. 001.058.055.558. 001.058.056.558. 001.058.057.558 001.076.000.576. 001.076.300.576. 001.076.301.571. 001.076.302.576. 001.076.304.575. 001.076.305.571. 001.090.000.511. 001.090.000.514. 001.090.000.517. 001.090.000.518. 001.090.000.519. 001.090.000.540. 001.090.000.550. 001.090.000.560. 001.090.000.594. 001.090.000.595. Public Works CED - Administration CED — Economic Development CED — Development Services -Engineering CED — Development Services -Planning CED — Building Parks & Rec—Administration Parks & Rec-Maintenance Parks & Rec-Recreation Parks & Rec- Aquatics Parks & Rec- Senior Center Parks & Rec-CenterPlace General Gov't- Council related General Gov't -Finance related General Gov't -Employee supply General Gov't- Centralized Services General Gov't -Other Services General Gov't -Transportation General Gov't -Natural & Economic General Gov't -Social Services General Gov't -Capital Outlay General Gov't -Pavement Preservation Other Funds 101 — Street Fund 103 — Paths & Trails 105 — Hotel/Motel Tax 106 — Solid Waste 120 - CenterPlace Operating Reserve 121— Service Level Stabilization Reserve 122 — Winter Weather Reserve 123 — Civil Facilities Replacement 204 — Debt Service 301 —REET 1 Capital Projects 302 - REET 2 Capital Projects 303 — Street Capital Projects 309 — Parks Capital Grants 310 — Civic Bldg Capital Projects 311 — Pavement Preservation 312 — Capital Reserve 402 — Stormwater Management 403 — Aquifer Protection Area 501 — Equipment Rental & Replacement 502 — Risk Management RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve attached list of claim vouchers. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.] STAFF CONTACT: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: Voucher Lists vchlist 02/05/2016 3:43:49PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 1 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 37611 2/5/2016 000197 ACRANET 37612 2/5/2016 000150 ALLIED FIRE & SECURITY 37613 2/5/2016 000234 ARLT, SHANE 37614 2/5/2016 000173 BINGAMAN, GREG 37615 2/5/2016 000904 BRANCH, CAROLBELLE 37616 2/5/2016 004889 BROWN, DOROTHY 37617 2/5/2016 003122 CALHOUN, MARK 37618 2/5/2016 002820 CASTELDA, SHANNON 37619 2/5/2016 000322 CENTURYLINK 37620 2/5/2016 001888 COMCAST 37621 2/5/2016 000508 CONOCOPHILLIPS FLEET 37622 2/5/2016 001880 CROWN WEST REALTY LLC 37623 2/5/2016 002385 DKS ASSOCIATES 1601635 SVC1114781 Q1-2016 Q1 2016 Q1 2016 CRY WOLF REFUND Q1 2016 AQUATICS REFUND JANUARY 2016 FEBRUARY 2016 43892508 JANUARY 2016 0059663 Fund/Dept 001.018.016.518 001.090.000.518 101.042.000.542 001.018.014.514 001.018.013.513 001.016.000.342 001.018.013.513 001.076.302.347 001.076.000.576 001.090.000.518 001.032.000.543 101.042.000.543 303.303.060.595 Description/Account Amount EMPLOYEE BACKGROUND CHECK Total : LOCK SERVICE Total : Q1 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE Total : Q1 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE Total : Q1 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE Total : FALSE ALARM REFUND PERMIT Vi Total : Q1 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE Total : AQUATICS REFUND Total : 2016 PHONE SVCS: ACCT 509 Z14 - Total : INTERNET CITY HALL Total : JANUARY 2016 FLEET FUEL BILL Total : COMMON AREA CHARGES FOR M. Total : 38.00 38.00 96.75 96.75 135.00 135.00 135.00 135.00 135.00 135.00 15.00 15.00 135.00 135.00 35.00 35.00 499.85 499.85 145.20 145.20 719.09 719.09 356.76 356.76 ARGONNE CORRIDOR SIGNAL & D 3,307.60 Page: 1 vchlist 02/05/2016 3:43:49PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 2 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 37623 2/5/2016 002385 002385 DKS ASSOCIATES 37624 2/5/2016 003615 DLT SOLUTIONS 37625 2/5/2016 000924 ELLER CORP 37626 2/5/2016 002075 ENVIROTECH SERVICES INC 37627 2/5/2016 001926 FARR, SARAH 37628 2/5/2016 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 37629 2/5/2016 001009 GOTHMANN, WILLIAM 37630 2/5/2016 002235 GRAFOS, DEAN 37631 2/5/2016 000007 GRAINGER 37632 2/5/2016 002568 GRANICUS INC (Continued) S1312085 12021 CD201608130 CD201608131 CD201608132 CD201608133 CD201608134 CD201608135 CD201608136 CD201608299 CD201608300 CD201608301 CD201608302 EXPENSE 45025 Fund/Dept 001.032.000.543 101.042.000.595 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 001.018.014.514 001.058.056.558 Q1 CELL ALLOWANCE 001.011.000.511 Q1 CELL ALLOWANCE 001.011.000.511 9000951195 101.042.000.542 73031 001.011.000.511 Description/Account Amount Total : AUTODESK SUPPORT RENEWAL Total : BUCKEYE OFFSITE SEWER ICE SLICER RS ICE SLICER RS ICE SLICER RS ICE SLICER RS ICE SLICER RS ICE SLICER RS ICE SLICER RS ICE SLICER RS ICE SLICER RS ICE SLICER RS ICE SLICER Total : Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : LEGAL PUBLICATION Total : Q1 2016 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCI Total : Q1 2016 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCI Total : SUPPLIES: PW Total : 3,307.60 10,807.12 10,807.12 38,951.98 38,951.98 5,416.87 5,546.10 5,406.10 5,411.48 5,524.56 5,411.48 5,409.70 5,388.15 5,555.07 5,562.26 5,411.48 60,043.25 43.20 43.20 182.75 182.75 135.00 135.00 135.00 135.00 104.60 104.60 MAINTENANCE FOR FEBRUARY 2C 777.16 Page: 2 vchlist 02/05/2016 3:43:49PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 3 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 37632 2/5/2016 002568 002568 GRANICUS INC 37633 2/5/2016 003177 GUTH, ERIC 37634 2/5/2016 002682 HAFNER, CHARLES 37635 2/5/2016 003297 HIGGINS, LEWIS ROD 37636 2/5/2016 002538 HYDRAULICS PLUS INC 37637 2/5/2016 004894 HYDROSCI LLC 37638 2/5/2016 000265 JACKSON, MIKE 37639 2/5/2016 003185 LAMB, ERIK 37640 2/5/2016 004632 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS 37641 2/5/2016 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. (Continued) EXPENSE Q1 CELL ALLOWANCE 01 CELL ALLOWANCE EXPENSE Q1 CELL PHONE 19985 CSV REFUND FEBRUARY 2016 Q1 2016 CELL PHONE EXPENSE 09501267 810502485001 810502528001 819028425001 819341847001 819704618001 819780300001 820470925001 820472252001 Fund/Dept 001.032.000.543 001.032.000.543 001.011.000.511 001.011.000.511 001.011.000.511 101.000.000.542 001.000.000.321 001.013.000.513 001.013.000.513 001.013.015.515 001.076.305.575 001.018.014.514 001.018.014.514 001.090.000.518 001.018.014.514 001.090.000.518 001.090.000.518 001.013.015.515 001.013.015.515 Description/Account Amount Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Q1 2016 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCI Total : Q1 2016 CELL ALLOWANCE Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Q1 2016 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCI Total : DUAL LEAD COIL Total : CSV ENDORSEMENT REFUND Total : AUTO ALLOWANCE Q1 2016 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCI Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : TELECOM SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES: IT OFFICE SUPPLIES: IT OFFICE SUPPLIES: IT OFFICE SUPPLIES: IT OFFICE SUPPLIES: IT OFFICE SUPPLIES: IT OFFICE SUPPLIES: LEGAL OFFICE SUPPLIES: LEGAL Total : 777.16 28.08 135.00 163.08 135.00 135.00 115.48 135.00 250.48 31.52 31.52 13.00 13.00 300.00 135.00 435.00 10.80 10.80 1,121.36 1,121.36 13.39 17.92 639.15 33.31 163.88 130.55 64.92 5.53 Page: 3 vchlist 02/05/2016 3:43:49PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 4 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 37641 2/5/2016 000652 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 37642 2/5/2016 003587 PACE, ED (Continued) EXPENSES Q1 2016 37643 2/5/2016 001604 PACIFIC NW PAPER 167427 37644 2/5/2016 004896 PINEHURST DEVELOPMENT LLC CIP 0166 37645 2/5/2016 000675 RAMAX PRINTING & AWARDS INC 27773 27797 37646 2/5/2016 002616 ROADWISE INC 37647 2/5/2016 002520 RWC GROUP 55947 55948 56034 56035 56036 56037 56057 21933N 21941N 22235N 22268N 22378N 22471N 37648 2/5/2016 000709 SENSKE LAWN & TREE CARE INC. 7034961 37649 2/5/2016 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 42000232 51503114 Fund/Dept 001.011.000.511 001.011.000.511 001.090.000.519 303.303.166.595 001.032.000.543 001.011.000.511 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 001.090.000.518 001.016.000.554 001.016.000.523 Description/Account Amount Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Q1 2016 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCI Total : PAPER FOR GENERAL USE Total : ROW & EASEMENTS SR 27 AND GI Total : NAME PLATE PLAQUES FOR COUNCIL CHAMBEI Total : FEEZGARD ZERO FEEZGARD ZERO FEEZGARD ZERO FEEZGARD ZERP FEEZGARD ZERO FEEZGARD ZERO FEEZGARD ZERO SUPPLIES: PW SUPPLIES: PW SUPPLIES: PW SUPPLIES: PW SUPPLIES: PW SUPPLIES: PW SNOW REMOVAL CITY HALL Total : Total : Total : ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES FEB JANUARY 2016 HOUSING INVOICE 1,068.65 40.67 135.00 175.67 117.40 117.40 24,077.00 24,077.00 16.85 46.20 63.05 5,847.06 5,798.09 5,877.45 5,782.89 5,789.66 5,787.96 5,801.47 40,684.58 162.97 157.38 645.35 170.77 159.79 110.59 1,406.85 179.37 179.37 20,435.67 110,241.18 Page: 4 vchlist 02/05/2016 3:43:49PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 5 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 37649 2/5/2016 000001 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER (Continued) 37650 2/5/2016 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST #3 Jan 2015 37651 2/5/2016 001969 SUNSHINE DISPOSAL 968677 37652 2/5/2016 003312 TAYLOR, CHELSIE EXPENSES 37653 2/5/2016 000335 TIRE-RAMA 8040061351 37654 2/5/2016 000468 TRANSOFT SOLUTIONS INC. 122512 37655 2/5/2016 002597 TWISTED PAIR ENTERPRISES LLC 1292016 37656 2/5/2016 000087 VERIZON WIRELESS 9759068644 9759191676 37657 2/5/2016 004895 WOOD, SAM 37658 2/5/2016 002651 WOODARD, ARNE 128160030 1/31/2016 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 49 Vouchers for bank code : apbank EXPENSE Q1 CELL PHONE Q1 CELL PHONE 9290200869 Fund/Dept 101.042.000.542 101.042.000.542 001.018.014.514 101.000.000.542 001.032.000.543 001.011.000.511 101.042.000.542 101.042.000.542 001.011.000.511 001.011.000.511 001.011.000.511 001.016.000.521 Description/Account Amount WATER CHARGES: PW Total : 130,676.85 Total : TRANSFER STATION - PARTIAL WII Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : TIRES Total : AUTOTURN SL MAP RENEWAL 1 YI Total : BROADCASTING COUNCIL MEETIN Total : JAN 2016 VERIZON CELL PHONES JAN 2016 WIRELESS DATA CARDS Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Q1 2016 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCI Total : Q1 2016 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCI Total : LE CONTRACT BILLING JANUARY: Total : Bank total : 64.35 64.35 334.56 334.56 10.92 10.92 1,704.42 1,704.42 770.00 770.00 1,456.00 1,456.00 1,399.67 320.08 1,719.75 34.16 135.00 169.16 135.00 135.00 1,467,372.00 1,467,372.00 1,791,279.13 49 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 1,791,279.13 Page: 5 vchlist 02/05/2016 3:52:10PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 37659 2/5/2016 003337 ARROW CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY INC CRY WOLF REFUND CRY WOLF REFUND 37660 2/5/2016 004888 BEDNOV, RAISA 37661 2/5/2016 004886 BEKINS NORTHWEST 37662 2/5/2016 002993 BROADWAY SPLICING SUPPLY 37663 2/5/2016 004891 CANTY, EARLE CRY WOLF REFUND CRY WOLF REFUND 414166 CRY WOLF REFUND 37664 2/5/2016 004890 CAR WASH PARTNERS, DBA MISTER CP CRY WOLF REFUND 37665 2/5/2016 004892 CM SPOKANE LLC 37666 2/5/2016 004887 COIN CORNER 8 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 8 Vouchers in this report CRY WOLF REFUN CRY WOLF REFUND Fund/Dept 001.016.000.342 001.016.000.342 001.016.000.342 001.016.000.342 101.000.000.542 001.016.000.342 001.016.000.342 001.016.000.342 001.016.000.342 Description/Account Amount FALSE ALARM REFUND PERMIT VL FALSE ALARM REFUND PERMIT V; Total : FALSE ALARM REFUND PERMIT 42 Total : FALSE ALARM REFUND PERMIT V1 Total : SUPPLIES: PW FALSE ALARM Total : Total : FALSE ALARM REFUND PERMIT VE Total : FALSE ALARM REFUND PERMIT VE Total : FALSE ALARM REFUND PERMIT V1 Total : Bank total : 200.00 35.00 235.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 308.44 308.44 25.00 25.00 35.00 35.00 57.00 57.00 35.00 35.00 745.44 Total vouchers : 745.44 Page: vchlist Voucher List(e)Page: 1 02/09/2016 10:44:08AM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 5390 2/5/2016 000165 DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS Ben65576 001.231.15.00 PERS: PAYMENT 94,236.25 Total : 94,236.25 5398 2/5/2016 000048 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS, 401A PLAN Ben65578 402.231.14.00 401A: PAYMENT 32,328.68 Total : 32,328.68 5399 2/5/2016 000682 EFTPS Ben65580 402.231.11.00 FEDERAL TAXES: PAYMENT 34,583.97 Total : 34,583.97 5400 2/5/2016 000145 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS, 457 PL/ Ben65582 001.231.18.00 457 DEFERRED COMPENSATION: PAYI 6,897.27 Total : 6,897.27 5401 2/5/2016 000162 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS, 401A EXEC P1 Ben65584 001.231.14.00 401 EXEC PLAN: PAYMENT 1,453.68 Total : 1,453.68 5410 2/5/2016 000682 EFTPS Ben65588 001.231.11.00 FEDERAL TAXES: PAYMENT 1,210.00 Total: 1,210.00 37667 2/5/2016 000120 AWC 37668 2/5/2016 000699 WA COUNCIL CO/CITY EMPLOYEES Ben65572 001.231.16.00 Ben65586 001.231.16.00 HEALTH PLANS: PAYMENT HEALTH PLANS (COUNCIL): PAYMENT Total : 125,516.62 10,868.27 136,384.89 Ben65574 001.231.21.00 UNION DUES: PAYMENT 2,568.49 Total : 2,568.49 8 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 309,663.23 8 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 309,663.23 Page: vchlist 02/11/2016 9:52:56AM E_/ Voucher List Page: 1 Spokane Valley Bank code : pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 6522 2/11/2016 004899 ADVOCARE PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREAT ROOM 210.00 Total : 210.00 6523 2/11/2016 002565 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: LOUNGE 210.00 Total : 210.00 6524 2/11/2016 004900 CHRISTIANSON, SYLVIA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: FIRESIDE LOUI 210.00 Total : 210.00 6525 2/11/2016 004901 HUSS, STEPHANIE PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: RM 216 52.00 Total : 52.00 6526 2/11/2016 004902 LABROSSE, STEPHANIE PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: SMALL DINING 27.00 Total : 27.00 6527 2/11/2016 004903 RIVER CITY CHIROPRACTIC PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: ROOM 109 52.00 Total : 52.00 6528 2/11/2016 004904 TRINDERA ENGINEERING PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: ROOM 109 52.00 Total : 52.00 7 Vouchers for bank code : pk-ref Bank total : 813.00 7 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 813.00 Page: J1 vchlist 02/12/2016 11:10: 20AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 37669 2/12/2016 001081 ALSCO 37670 2/12/2016 000841 BCI CREATIVE INC 37671 2/12/2016 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC 37672 2/12/2016 000796 BUDINGER & ASSOCIATES INC 37673 2/12/2016 001169 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY 37674 2/12/2016 004132 COBBLESTONE CATERING & EVENTS 37675 2/12/2016 000326 CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION #19 37676 2/12/2016 000278 DRISKELL, CARY 37677 2/12/2016 002308 FINKE, MELISSA 37678 2/12/2016 004813 FIRST CHOICE COFFEE SERVICES LS PO 1718668 LS PO 1724019 12636 9716354 9718401 9720447 S0124257 S0127372 S0127376 S0128381 M15639-1 Jan 2016 409-1 Jan 2016 Expenses Jan 2016 132159 Fund/Dept 001.016.000.521 001.016.000.521 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 309.000.225.594 001.011.000.511 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.013.015.515 001.076.301.571 001.076.305.575 Description/Account Amount FLOOR MAT SERVICE PRECINCT FLOOR MAT SERVICE AT PRECINC Total : CENTERPLACE WEBSITE DESIGN Total : LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY FOR LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY FOR LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY FOR LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY FOR LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY FOR LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY FOR LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY FOR Total : PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Total : PETTY CASH: 13668, 70,72,73,74,7: Total : CATERING FOR EVENTS AT CENTE Total : UTILITIES: CP EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT INSTRUCTOR PMT Total : Total : Total : 20.39 20.39 40.78 50.00 50.00 250.16 231.61 299.30 59.40 45.38 14.22 20.63 920.70 378.85 378.85 36.98 36.98 1,715.29 1,715.29 64.40 64.40 274.77 274.77 273.75 273.75 COFFEE SUPPLIES AT CENTERPU 205.12 Total : 205.12 Page: vchlist 02/12/2016 11:10:20AM Voucher List Spokane Valley /4r r1 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 37679 2/12/2016 000321 GREATER SPOKANE INC 37680 2/12/2016 000011 GREATER SPOKANE VALLEY 37681 2/12/2016 000441 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 37682 2/12/2016 002991 IAVM 37683 2/12/2016 003277 INLAND NW BUSINESS ALLIANCE 37684 2/12/2016 000070 INLAND POWER & LIGHT CO 37685 2/12/2016 000388 IRVIN WATER DIST. #6 37686 2/12/2016 000132 MODERN ELECTRIC WATER CO 37687 2/12/2016 000132 MODERN ELECTRIC WATER CO 37688 2/12/2016 000058 OMA 37689 2/12/2016 001133 PATRIOT FIRE PROTECTION INC. 37690 2/12/2016 003307 PERIMETER SECURITY GROUP 106833 25805 January 2016 00076337 22026 #2301 Jan 2016 Jan 2016 January 2016 A500163 2212927 7563 37691 2/12/2016 001860 PLATT ELECTRICAL SUPPLY H823282 1508180 Fund/Dept 001.076.305.575 001.011.000.511 001.090.000.518 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 101.042.000.542 Description/Account Amount ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES CEN Total : GEM OF THE VALLEY REGISTRATI1 Total : SUPPLIES: GEN GOV AND PW Total : 2016 MEMBERSHIP DUES: C. CARL Total : ADVERTISING FOR CENTERPLACE Total : Total : Total : UTILITIES: JAN 2016 PW Total : Total : UTILITIES: JAN 2016 PW 001.076.300.576 UTILITIES: PARKS 101.042.000.542 001.076.302.576 001.018.016.518 001.076.305.575 001.016.000.521 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 UTILITIES: JAN 2016 PARKS NEW HIRE PHYSICALS FOR JAN Total : SERVICE CALL: REPAIR LEAKING Total : JOB NO S6045A Total : SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 700.00 700.00 110.00 110.00 470.21 470.21 470.00 470.00 1,350.00 1,350.00 415.90 415.90 166.00 166.00 8,746.74 8,746.74 2,511.87 2,511.87 165.00 165.00 500.02 500.02 206.53 206.53 118.21 21.70 Page: vchlist Voucher List 02/12/2016 11:10:20AM Spokane Valley Page: /( Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 37691 2/12/2016 001860 PLATT ELECTRICAL SUPPLY 37692 37693 37694 37695 37696 37697 37698 37699 37700 37701 37702 2/12/2016 000709 SENSKE LAWN & TREE CARE INC. 2/12/2016 001066 SHARP -LINE INDUSTRIES INC. 2/12/2016 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 2/12/2016 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST #3 (Continued) 1511306 1551124 1605999 7034962 M114867 -IN 45105.9010 U006 Jan 2016 2/12/2016 001083 STANDARD PLBG HEATING CONTROLS 54036 2/12/2016 003532 STERICYCLE COMMUNICATION SOLUT 8010234381 2/12/2016 001969 SUNSHINE DISPOSAL 2/12/2016 001472 TESTAMERICA LABORATORIES 2/12/2016 000167 VERA WATER & POWER 2/12/2016 000098 WA CITIES INSURANCE AUTHORITY 987366 59102435 February 2016 Jan 2016 2/12/2016 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 0241236-2681-4 0241237-2681-2 Fund/Dept Description/Account 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 Amount SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE Total : 001.016.000.521 SNOW REMOVAL AT PRECINCT 001.076.300.576 BARRICADES FOR PARKS/CP 001.076.000.576 UID BOND FOR UTILITY IMPROVER 001.076.300.576 WATER CHARGES: PARKS 001.016.000.521 JAN 2016 MONTHLY MAINT: PRECI 001.076.305.575 ANSWERING SVC CENTERPLACE Total : Total : 101.042.000.542 001.076.300.576 101.042.000.542 001.000.000.369 402.402.000.531 001.076.305.575 TRANSFER STATION Total : Total : Total : Total : Total : J2704-1 MONTHLY DRINKING WATI Total : UTILITIES: FEB 2016 SPOKANE CO SETTLEMENT Total : Total : 74.42 62.15 138.27 414.75 570.69 570.69 633.18 633.18 1,793.05 1,793.05 39.36 39.36 605.46 605.46 39.44 39.44 566.39 566.39 28.50 28.50 3,345.86 3,345.86 85,000.00 85,000.00 WASTE MGMT MAINT SHOP: JAN 2 173.27 WASTE MGMT: CENTERPLACE 738.92 Page: vchlist 02/12/2016 11:10:20AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 4 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 37702 2/12/2016 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE (Continued) 0241238-2681-0 37703 2/12/2016 003610 WEST PLAINS CHAMBER OF COMMERC 2016-299 37704 2/12/2016 000361 WSDOT 36 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 36 Vouchers in this report I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date STPUL-9932(042) Fund/Dept 001.016.000.521 001.076.305.575 303.303.159.333 Description/Account Amount WASTE MGMT: PRECINCT Total : MEMBERSHIP FOR CENTERPLACE Total : UNIVERSITY ROAD OVERPASS STI Total : 283.09 1,195.28 250.00 250.00 389.25 389.25 Bank total : 114,644.12 Total vouchers : 114,644.12 Page: `4 vchlist 02/12/2016 1:22:12PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: /3 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 37705 2/12/2016 002931 ALL WESTERN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 102077 102100 37706 2/12/2016 000277 AWC 37707 2/12/2016 002326 BATTERIES PLUS BULBS 37708 2/12/2016 004439 BIRCH COMMUNICATIONS INC 37709 2/12/2016 000796 BUDINGER & ASSOCIATES INC 37710 2/12/2016 004897 CICOTTE, GEORGE 37711 2/12/2016 002572 CINTAS CORPORATION 37712 2/12/2016 002604 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC 37713 2/12/2016 002157 ELJAY OIL COMPANY 37714 2/12/2016 003609 EVERGREEN SAFETY COUNCIL 40995 40996 40997 248-304873 248-305389 20529657 M14310-10 3830 601168660 606169870 606170031 606171091 606172318 606172477 78352271 4247117 2015-2016 Fund/Dept 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 001.011.000.511 001.011.000.511 001.011.000.511 001.090.000.519 001.090.000.519 Description/Account Amount SUPPLIES: PW SUPPLIES: PW Total : 2016 RUNNING GREAT MEETINGS: 2016 RUNNING GREAT MEETINGS: 2016 RUNNING GREAT MEETINGS: Total : SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL CM Total : 001.076.305.575 PHONE SERVICE AT CENTERPLAC Total : 303.303.155.595 0155-SULLIVAN BRIDGE MATERIAL Total : 001.018.016.518 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.042.000.543 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.042.000.543 SUPPLIES: PW SUPPLIES: PW SUPPLIES: PW SUPPLIES: PW SUPPLIES: PW SUPPLIES: PW Total : Total : 552.54 126.74 679.28 65.00 65.00 65.00 195.00 147.40 -55.27 92.13 210.97 210.97 3,891.86 3,891.86 468.75 468.75 125.85 112.42 219.84 112.42 112.42 255.95 938.90 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE 001-8922117-0( 1,006.63 Total : 1,006.63 101.000.000.542 FUEL FOR MAINTENANCE SHOP & 2,388.44 Total : 2,388.44 001.018.016.518 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL CITY 299.00 Page: 'T vchlist 02/12/2016 1:22:12PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: / �2 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 37714 2/12/2016 003609 003609 EVERGREEN SAFETY COUNCIL (Continued) 37715 2/12/2016 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 37716 2/12/2016 002992 FREEDOM TRUCK CENTERS 37717 2/12/2016 001253 GORDON THOMAS HONEYWELL 37718 2/12/2016 000007 GRAINGER 37719 2/12/2016 002810 INLAND NW PARTNERS ASSOC 37720 2/12/2016 002518 INLAND PACIFIC HOSE & FITINGS 37721 2/12/2016 001944 LANCER LTD 37722 2/12/2016 002259 MENKE JACKSON BEYER LLP 37723 2/12/2016 003090 NORTH 40 OUTFITTERS 37724 2/12/2016 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 45062 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 45067 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 45068 001.058.056.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION PC001327097:01 Jan16 1042 9006004338 JANUARY 2016 539785 0457391 0457490 101.000.000.542 001.011.000.511 101.042.000.542 001.013.000.513 101.000.000.542 106.000.230.537 001.032.000.543 439 SPOK VALLEY/DIRK 001.013.015.515 492 - EDEN PIT 001.013.015.515 067174/3 067219/3 817676598001 819704579001 820289964001 820505544001 101.042.000.542 101.042.000.542 001.076.305.575 001.090.000.518 001.032.000.543 001.076.000.576 SUPPLIES: PW GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS SUPPLIES: PW Total : Total : Total : Total : Total : M JACKSON - CITY MEMBERSHIP Total : SUPPLIES: PW BROCHURES - RECYCLING BUSINESS CARDS Total : Total : PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Total : SUPPLIES: PW SUPPLIES: PW Total : OFFICE SUPPLIES: CENTERPLACE OFFICE SUPPLIES: IT OFFICE SUPPLIES: PW OFFICE SUPPLIES: CENTERPLACE 299.00 52.80 49.30 88.40 190.50 8.14 8.14 3,405.97 3,405.97 35.90 35.90 150.00 150.00 376.73 376.73 1,734.26 54.07 1,788.33 137.65 5,916.65 6,054.30 14.12 10.85 24.97 35.18 47.82 24.40 42.47 Page: 2� vchlist 02/12/2016 1:22:12PM Voucher List Spokane Valley %6 Page: Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 37724 2/12/2016 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 37725 2/12/2016 001089 POE ASPHALT PAVING INC. 37726 2/12/2016 003407 RIGHT! SYSTEMS INC 37727 2/12/2016 002616 ROADWISE INC 37728 2/12/2016 000031 ROYAL BUSINESS SYSTEMS 37729 2/12/2016 002288 SARGENT ENGINEERS INC. 37730 2/12/2016 002835 SCS DELIVERY INC 37731 2/12/2016 002531 SIX ROBBLEES INC 37732 2/12/2016 000779 SOUTHARD, BRAD 37733 2/12/2016 000230 SPOKANE CO AUDITORS OFFICE 37734 2/12/2016 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE (Continued) 822598228001 44829 140156 140157 56103 IN 37716 30266 8063 5-755633 5-756115 5-756614 5-756647 5-756648 JANUARY 2016 JANUARY 2016 3256106936 3262546907 Fund/Dept 001.018.013.513 101.000.000.542 001.090.099.594 001.090.099.594 101.000.000.542 001.058.057.558 101.043.236.542 001.011.000.511 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.042.000.542 001.058.056.558 001.011.000.511 001.011.000.511 Description/Account Amount OFFICE SUPPLIES: FRONT DESK Total : SNOW REMOVAL Total : JUNIPER 24 PORT FIBER SWITCH JUNIPER PHASE 2 SWITCHES FIBE Total : FEEZGARD ZERO Total : JANUARY 2016 COPIER COSTS Total : CONTRACT 15-133 Total : PACKAGE DELIVERY FOR COUNCI Total : SUPPLIES: PW - CREDIT MEMO SUPPLIES: PW SUPPLIES: PW SUPPLIES: PW SUPPLIES: PW - CREDIT MEMO Total : DEAD AMIMAL REMOVAL RECORDING FEES Total : Total : OFFICE SUPPLIES: LEGISLATIVE OFFICE SUPPLIES: LEGISLATIVE 70.48 220.35 7,328.07 7,328.07 11,268.59 22,443.94 33, 712.53 5,801.47 5,801.47 1,129.31 1,129.31 2,527.50 2,527.50 100.00 100.00 -48.92 382.15 338.01 96.96 -96.96 671.24 1,865.00 1,865.00 788.00 788.00 75.76 39.75 Page: vchlist 02/12/2016 1:22:12PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: /( Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 37734 2/12/2016 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 37735 37736 37737 37738 37739 37740 37741 37742 205160019 2/12/2016 000335 TIRE-RAMA 2/12/2016 000717 TRANSPO GROUP INC. 2/12/2016 000014 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC. 2/12/2016 001670 VAN DYK, KEN 2/12/2016 001134 WA STATE DEPT OF HEALTH 2/12/2016 001792 WHITEHEAD, JOHN 2/12/2016 002651 WOODARD, ARNE 2/12/2016 004741 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC 2/5/2016 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER (Continued) 3291614169 3291614171 3291614173 3291614178 3291614179 3291614180 3291614181 8080041090 18363 045-151612 EXPENSES 010460-2 EXPENSES EXPENSE 0180376 JANUARY 2016 Fund/Dept 001.018.013.513 001.018.013.513 001.011.000.511 001.011.000.511 001.013.000.513 001.011.000.511 001.011.000.511 001.032.000.543 303.000.201.595 001.090.099.594 303.303.155.595 402.402.000.531 001.018.016.518 001.011.000.511 101.042.000.542 001.016.000.512 Description/Account Amount OFFICE SUPPLIES: LEGISLATIVE OFFICE SUPPLIES: LEGISLATIVE OFFICE SUPPLIES: LEGISLATIVE OFFICE SUPPLIES: LEGISLATIVE OFFICE SUPPLIES: LEGISLATIVE OFFICE SUPPLIES: LEGISLATIVE OFFICE SUPPLIES: LEGISLATIVE Total : BATTERY FOR 53179D Total : 0201 - ENGINEERING SERVICES Total : 32.87 26.87 6.88 8.17 127.69 18.79 14.71 351.49 158.99 158.99 14,715.50 14,715.50 LASERFICHE - EDEN CONNECTOR 10,870.00 Total : 10,870.00 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : 2016 WATERWORKS OPERATOR C Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : SUPPLIES FOR PW Total : SPOKANE COUNTY SERVICES Total : 149.04 149.04 77.00 77.00 30.02 30.02 487.26 487.26 728.40 728.40 168,512.99 168, 512.99 Page: vchlist 02/12/2016 1:22:12PM Voucher List Page: /?-' Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 39 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 39 Vouchers in this report I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Bank total : 272,429.96 Total vouchers : 272,429.96 Page: vchlist 02/17/2016 11:50:22AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page:/ Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 37743 2/17/2016 000334 ARGUS JANITORIAL LLC 37744 2/17/2016 002920 DIRECTV INC 37745 2/17/2016 001635 ISS FACILITY EVENT SERVICES 37746 2/17/2016 001002 M & L SUPPLY CO INC 37747 2/17/2016 000709 SENSKE LAWN & TREE CARE INC. 37748 2/17/2016 000323 SPOKANE CO UTILITIES INV013113 27768518355 990186 S100243113.001 7045442 Feb 2016 37749 2/17/2016 001083 STANDARD PLBG HEATING CONTROLS 54082 37750 2/17/2016 001444 UNITED LABORATORIES 37751 2/17/2016 000066 WCP SOLUTIONS 37752 2/17/2016 003128 YWCA OF SPOKANE 10 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 10 Vouchers in this report INV144927 9423467 9423468 Feb 2016 Fund/Dept 001.016.000.521 101.042.000.543 001.076.305.575 001.016.000.521 001.016.000.521 001.076.302.576 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.090.000.560 Description/Account Amount JANITORIAL SVCS: JAN 2016 Total : CABLE SERVICE FOR MAINTENAN Total : JAN 2016 MONTHLY CLEANING Total : SUPPLIES FOR PRECINCT MONTHLY PEST CONTROL Total : Total : SPOKANE CO SEWER CHRGS:FEE Total : WORK ORDER 26364 Total : SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE Total : SUPPLIES AT CENTERPLACE SUPPLIES AT CENTERPLACE Total : 2016 SOC SER GRANT REIMBURSI Total : 2,501.87 2,501.87 103.98 103.98 7,136.00 7,136.00 84.22 84.22 84.73 84.73 1,730.42 1,730.42 904.94 904.94 553.49 553.49 743.29 80.44 823.73 774.38 774.38 Bank total : 14,697.76 Total vouchers : 14,697.76 Page: vchlist 02/17/2016 3:47:06PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: (119 -� Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 37753 2/17/2016 004185 AMP'D ENTERTAINMENT LLC 37754 2/17/2016 000673 BUDGET ARBOR & LOGGING LLC 37755 2/17/2016 000101 CDW-G 37756 2/17/2016 002469 COMMUNITY MINDED ENTERPRISES 37757 2/17/2016 000278 DRISKELL, CARY 37758 2/17/2016 003697 ELECTRIC LIGHTWAVE LLC 2537 11-2849 BXZ9319 FEBRUARY 2016 EXPENSES 13630617 37759 2/17/2016 002507 FASTENERS INC S4454225.001 S4478146.001 37760 2/17/2016 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 37761 2/17/2016 000002 H & H BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC. 45026 45063 45105 45107 45108 45109 45110 45111 309216 309217 309653 309654 309661 Fund/Dept 107.000.000.594 101.042.000.542 001.090.000.518 107.000.000.518 001.013.015.515 001.090.000.586 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 001.013.015.515 106.000.000.537 001.058.056.558 001.013.000.513 001.013.000.513 001.013.000.513 001.058.056.558 001.058.056.558 001.058.057.558 001.058.057.558 001.013.000.513 001.013.000.513 001.013.015.515 Description/Account Amount COUNCIL CHAMBERS PHASE 2 WI Total : TREE REMOVAL - STORM DAMAGE Total : IT SUPPLIES PEG REIMBURSEMENT Total : Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : SCRAPS INTERNET SERVICE Total : SUPPLIES: PW SUPPLIES: PW LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION COPIER COSTS COPIER COSTS COPIER COSTS COPIER COSTS COPIER COSTS Total : Total : 11,556.97 11,556.97 2,228.35 2,228.35 127.77 127.77 11,816.53 11,816.53 633.24 633.24 104.94 104.94 87.38 42.71 130.09 308.20 121.60 137.60 39.10 39.95 60.35 85.85 101.15 893.80 69.77 4.25 200.38 27.01 111.71 Page: vchlist 02/17/2016 3:47:06PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 4()--z Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 37761 2/17/2016 000002 H & H BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC. (Continued) 309662 001.013.015.515 COPIER COSTS 20.21 309669 001.058.050.558 COPIER COSTS 129.09 309670 001.058.050.558 COPIER COSTS 22.36 309675 001.018.016.518 COPIER COSTS 24.38 309676 001.018.016.518 COPIER COSTS 3.36 309789 001.076.000.576 COPIER COSTS 278.95 309790 001.076.000.576 COPIER COSTS 9.95 309825 001.058.057.558 COPIER COSTS 3.65 Total : 905.07 37762 2/17/2016 001728 HP FINANCIAL SERVICES CO 600480846 001.090.000.548 SCHEDULE 572E3651 830.28 Total : 830.28 37763 2/17/2016 002203 NAPA AUTO PARTS 7157300 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES FOR MAINTENANCE SH 29.39 7157845 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES FOR MAINTENANCE SH 19.69 Total : 49.08 37764 2/17/2016 000193 NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC March 2016 001.090.000.518 CITY HALL RENT MARCH 2016 35,511.52 Total : 35,511.52 37765 2/17/2016 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 822072007001 001.090.000.518 OFFICE SUPPLIES: IT 39.99 Total : 39.99 37766 2/17/2016 000881 OXARC INC R393527 101.042.000.542 CYLINDER RENTAL 106.06 Total : 106.06 37767 2/17/2016 001578 PACIFICAD INC 30541 001.032.000.543 TRAINING 2-2 & 2-3-16 2,642.40 Total : 2,642.40 37768 2/17/2016 003653 PARTSMASTER 20983888 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 237.61 Total: 237.61 37769 2/17/2016 002835 SCS DELIVERY INC 7942 001.011.000.511 PACKAGE DELIVERY FOR COUNCI 100.00 Total : 100.00 37770 2/17/2016 000709 SENSKE LAWN & TREE CARE INC. 6462944 101.042.000.542 895 CONTRACT MAINTENANCE 530.46 Page: vchlist 02/17/2016 3:47:06PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: al/ `3"-- Bank 3' Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 37770 2/17/2016 000709 000709 SENSKE LAWN & TREE CARE INC. (Continued) Total : 530.46 37771 2/17/2016 001140 SPECIAL ASPHALT PRODUCTS INVCO70444 101.042.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 880.47 Total : 880.47 37772 2/17/2016 004131 SPOKANE CO SOLID WASTE MGMT 20160205-5491-32919 101.042.000.542 TRANSFER STATION CHARGES: P1 122.21 Total : 122.21 37773 2/17/2016 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 51503125 101.042.000.542 1-2016 WORK CREW: PW 4,147.00 Total : 4,147.00 37774 2/17/2016 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 3291614168 001.018.013.513 OFFICE SUPPLIES: FRONT OFFICE 74.34 Total : 74.34 37775 2/17/2016 004740 THOMSON REUTERS -WEST 833402795 001.013.015.515 SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES 766.02 Total : 766.02 37776 2/17/2016 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 0063033-1518-5 402.402.000.531 WASTE MANAGEMENT:PW 2,490.45 Total : 2,490.45 37777 2/17/2016 001885 ZAYO GROUP LLC FEBRUARY 2016 001.090.000.518 DARK FIBER LEASE 253.01 FEBRUARY 2016 001.090.000.518 INTERNET SERVICE 569.21 Total : 822.22 212160219 2/12/2016 002244 AOT PUBLIC SAFETY CORPORATION SPKVLY-74 001.016.000.521 JANUARY 2016 REVENUE SPLIT F( 2,820.00 Total : 2,820.00 26 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 80,566.87 26 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 80,566.87 Page: Page: vchlist Voucher List 02/18/2016 7:58:43AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 5402 2/19/2016 002227 IDAHO TAX COMMISSION Ben65845 001.231.50.03 IDAHO STATE TAX BASE: PAYMENT 950.02 Total : 950.02 5412 2/19/2016 000048 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS, 401A PLAN Ben65847 001.231.14.00 401A: PAYMENT 33,196.98 Total : 33,196.98 5413 2/19/2016 000682 EFTPS Ben65849 001.231.11.00 FEDERAL TAXES: PAYMENT 35,240.31 Total : 35,240.31 5415 2/19/2016 000145 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS, 457 PLf Ben65851 001.231.18.00 457 DEFERRED COMPENSATION: PAYI 6,952.35 Total : 6,952.35 5416 2/19/2016 000162 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS, 401A EXEC PL Ben65853 001.231.14.00 401 EXEC PLAN: PAYMENT 1,184.07 Total : 1,184.07 37778 2/19/2016 000210 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Ben65843 001.231.28.00 HEALTH REIMBURSEMENT ACCOUNT: 750.00 Total : 750.00 6 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 78,273.73 6 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 78,273.73 Page: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: February 23, 2016 Department Director Approval : Item: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ['new business ['public hearing ['information ❑admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Payroll for Pay Period Ending February 15, 2016 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN; BACKGROUND: Budget/Financial impacts: Employees Council Total Gross: $ 281,948.71 $ $ 281,948.71 Benefits: $ 102,958.39 $ $ 102,958.39 Total payroll $ 384,907.10 $ $ 384,907.10 RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to Approve above payroll. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.] STAFF CONTACT: Raba Nimri DRAFT Attendance: Councilmembers MINUTES SPOKANE VALLEY COUNCIL MEETING STUDY SESSION Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers Spokane Valley, Washington February 2, 2016 Staff Rod Higgins, Mayor Arne Woodard, Deputy Mayor Dean Grafos, Councilmember Chuck Hafner, Councilmember Ed Pace, Councilmember Sam Wood, Councilmember Bill Gothmann, Councilmember Pro Tem Mike Jackson, City Manager Cary Driskell, City Attorney Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney John Hohman, Comm. & Economic Dev. Dir. Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director Mark Calhoun, Deputy City Manager Mike Stone, Parks & Rec Director Steve Worley, Capital Improvmt Program Mgr. Gabe Gallinger, Senior Development Engineer Adam Jackson, Assistant Engineer Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Mayor Higgins called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Proposed Resolutions Gender -Segregated Facilities — Councilmember Wood/City Attorney Driskell a. Discussion of Draft Resolutions: After Mayor Higgins read a brief statement about observing rules of courtesy and respect in the conduct of meetings, he mentioned last week's discussion on the topic of gender -segregated facilities and the resolution drafted by Councilmember Wood, which discussion he said resulted in a request that the City Attorney draft a more concise version. Mayor Higgins opened the floor for discussion. b. Motion to approve Resolution 16-003: It was moved by Councilmember Wood and seconded to accept the resolution written by the City Attorney. Councilmember Gothmann explained how this issue came about, and distributed copies to Council quoting various RCWs (Revised Code of Washington), WACs (Washington Administrative Code), and a portion of US Constitution Amendment XIV. Councilmember Pace said the first resolution is the one he and Councilmember Pace drafted, and it was made extra long just to have all the pertinent RCWs and WACs in one place and make the point that our citizens don't agree with WAC 162-32-060; said the City Attorney's one-page resolution is perfect and suggested that it be read at some point tonight. Councilmember Wood said that he heard from a lot of people who were "up in arms" over it; said he knows Council can't make law and said he was trying to make a statement and be supportive of the representatives we send to Olympia working hard to try to change this; he read proposed Senate Bill 6443: "The human rights commission shall repeal the rule currently codified at WAC 162-32-060 in its entirety. The human rights commission may not thereafter initiate any rule-making procedure that involves the subject of gender segregated facilities." Councilmember Hafner said he appreciates Mayor Higgins bringing up the governance rules, which he said need to be followed so we don't have chaos; said he has researched this issue over the past week and is trying to take out the emotional aspect and look at this objectively; said he has not heard from most people about how they feel about this; said this Council is not involved in civil rights as that belongs to the state legislature and we have to have enough faith in them to do the right thing; said this Council's power lies in doing what is best for this community; he Council Study Session: 02-02-2016 Page 1 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT encouraged people to make a difference to those in Olympia and make concerns known; said this Council is getting involved on the wrong path and debating resolutions on decisions outside Council's control. Councilmember Grafos read his statement that he is not in favor of the resolution as it is not the business of the city; said there are many issues this Council has worked on to promote growth and business in our community, and throughout it all, Council has tried not to get into issues beyond Council's scope of responsibility; said we are asked to tackle the issues we can but instead of working on these challenges, are taking on the partisan issues of Olympia and the Nation; he cautioned against confusing criminality and voyeurism with privacy and human rights; said he didn't sign last week's letter; that it was a waste of taxpayer dollars to bring "polarizing issues to the Council that are not decided by us, pandering to fear." After Deputy Mayor Woodard read the resolution, Mayor Higgins invited public comment. Tony Lazanis, Paul Bonner, Sam Harding, Kayloni Bonner, Yvonne Frederick, George Conrad, and Jay Beemis all spoke in favor of the resolution and against WAC 162-30-060; Farnard Gunels spoke in opposition to the resolution. Councilmember Gothmann said he favors what Council is proposing; that he recognizes Council can't change the system or the laws, and that he is concerned with Council spending an inordinate amount of time on issues where they don't have powers and he doesn't want to get away from Council's primary responsibilities, but he wants to listen to the people and tell legislators there is a concern. Councilmember Hafner said he will vote no because it is a state legislature problem; that he doesn't want to get involved in civil rights issues as that is out of this Council's realm. Councilmember Pace said that according to the State Constitution in Article 1, the sole purpose of government is to protect the God-given rights of the people; said he supports the resolution and helped Councilmember Wood write the first draft. Mayor Higgins said he supports the legislation repealing the WAC. Vote by acclamation: In Favor: Mayor Higgins, Deputy Mayor Woodard, and Councilmembers Gothmann, Pace and Wood. Opposed: Councilmembers Grafos and Hafner. Motion carried. NON -ACTION ITEMS: 2. Sportsplex — Kevin Twohig, Public Facilities District (PFD) Public Facilities District Chief Executive Officer Kevin Twohig said he invited Spokane Sports Commission President Eric Sawyer to help with tonight's presentation on the proposed sportsplex; said they are working to get the facility completed and are interested in Council's opinion. Messrs. Twohig and Sawyer discussed the features of the multi-purpose fieldhouse and icehouse, and showed photos of similar facilities depicting such things as a hydraulic banked track, and areas for volleyball and basketball courts, and wrestling mats; they displayed a chart showing the total facility cost of $41.1 million compared with an estimated $101.5 million economic impact over five years; mentioned the benefits of additional visitors, hotel stays and overall tourism spending with an estimated $1 to $1.7 million in increased general tax revenues, as well as providing our local athletes an exceptional facility. They discussed the potential of over 200 championship events, such as USA Badminton, Basketball, Wrestling, Figure Skating and Track and Field. Mr. Twohig said that they have negotiated a property agreement with Spokane City Parks and they want to be able to use the facility during periods of less demand, and if there was revenue it would be shared; said this facility would not cover its operating costs so they put an agreement together with their (PFD) Lodging Tax Allocation Committee, and that group has agreed to cover the operating losses, which will be approximately $250,000 annually Mr. Twohig said the Sports Commission would do the marketing and program, and the PFD would maintain and operate the facility; adding that having the facility close enough to the Arena means sharing many of the same maintenance technicians. He also mentioned that the State is trying to maximize the number of public facilities and create more PFDs through a state sales tax rebate legislation, which would not occur without voter approval. They discussed the three financing options as noted in their PowerPoint, adding that option #2 is more complicated since it involves so many entities. Mr. Twohig said the working group is focusing on option Council Study Session: 02-02-2016 Page 2 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT 1 and 3, and that option 1 — the levy lid lift — would be a short term of nine years with the balance of the financing coming from the state sales tax rebate; and said while he hasn't heard anything negative about the bill, he doesn't know if the legislature will pass it; and mentioned that he hopes to get some feedback on the bill (HB 2296) today. Spokane County Commissioner O'Quinn was asked to join the presenters and she explained that the facility is still in the planning stage, and they are asking for feedback; that they want Council to take part in all the conversations moving forward and wanted to actively engage Council to keep them abreast of the project; and she said that the fmancing options are concepts at this point. Continued discussion included the sports facility as well as the ideas generated for the property near the HUB and for Plantes Ferry; that any such a ballot measure would be county -wide; mention of what other PFDs across the country do regarding localized events; Councilmember Pace mentioned the idea of having the facility in Spokane Valley where there is ample free parking; and there was apparent agreement among Councilmembers that they want to read the study before making any decisions. Commissioner O'Quinn said it all comes down to the voters as it must go on the ballot; and she expressed hope that Council would remain engaged in future conversations. Mayor Higgins called for a recess at 7:44 p.m.; he reconvened the meeting at 7:54 p.m. 3. Amended 2016 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) — Steve Worley Mr. Worley went over the background of the TIP process and of the need for amending the 2016 TIP, all as noted on his February 2, 2016 Request for Council Action form. There were no objections to moving this forward next week for a public hearing and resolution consideration. 4. Sidewalks and Development — Gabe Gallinger, Adam Jackson Development Services Manager Gabe Gallinger and Assistant Engineer Adam Jackson gave a report on sidewalk construction requirements within the city, including the physical construction requirements, types of projects that typically include sidewalk construction, funding mechanisms for public projects, and threshold for projects to include sidewalks. They also compared our frontage improvement regulations with those of Spokane County and the cities of Spokane and Liberty Lake. There was also some discussion about rolled or squared curbs, and "bump outs." 5. City Hall Update — John Hohman As an update on the design process, Mr. Hohman said he has been working on the design with the architect, and last week they met with the different departments and went through the floor plans and different attributes of the building, and made some fmal corrections; said the architect will have another half-day session with the design team next week and will soon have a complete set of plans 95% complete; said they'll put all the pieces together and create the bid documents which should be ready by February 22; then they will have to determine the exact bid dates and periods; said they are projecting to have this out early March, and give the bidders three or four weeks to prepare bid documents for a bid in early April; then bring the results to Council. Mr. Hohman mentioned the approach locations and major entry points; said through a reciprocal access agreement Dartmouth will be widened a little to make sure it matches our adopted standards; mentioned the trees and said two existing trees will be saved but a third tree has roots growing up through the asphalt so likely will not make it through the construction process. Councilmember Hafner asked about a tree for next year's Christmas celebration and Mr. Hohman replied that it will be possible, and that he will have more discussion with members of the Rotary Club for the logistics of the Christmas tree. Mr. Hohman noted the materials on display in front of Council so as to give Council an idea of the colors and physical material. 6. Spokane Transit Authority (STA) Appointment of Board Alternates — Councilmember Hafner Councilmember Hafner explained about the idea of having appointed STA Board Member alternates for those occasions when he and/or Councilmember Pace might be unable to attend an STA meeting; said initially he thought about one or two of the other mayors in the area, but then they might have a different Council Study Session: 02-02-2016 Page 3 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT take on any issue, so he thought alternates from this Council might be more appropriate. Deputy Mayor Woodard and Councilmember Gothmann and Wood volunteered. Mayor Higgins said the appointment of the alternates would be made at next week's meeting, and he agreed to have such resolution on the Consent Agenda. 7. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins Councilmember Grafos asked about the electrical franchise agreement and Mr. Jackson said there was discussion about imposing a fee with the utility bill to raise money for undergrounding; said he had a conversation with the previous finance committee and they left a little uncertain; said the next committee meeting can re -visit the issue; that we have some numbers now of what a 1% or 2% fee would generate. Councilmember Grafos also asked about LED lights on streetlights and Mr. Jackson said staff will put a report together on the subject. 8. Council Comments — Mayor Higgins Councilmember Gothmann asked about Councilmembers going to Olympia, and it was explained that was part of the AWC (Association of Washington Cities) meeting. 9. City Manager Comments — Mike Jackson Mr. Jackson said he spoke with Lobbyist Briahna Murray who testified this morning with concerns on HB 2693 that would have allowed the state to issue a vaping lounge with a retail license, and said there was a lot of opposition; concerning our City's nuisance abatement 2519, that was voted on in the morning by the House Local Government Committee and if it goes from there it will move to the finance committee meeting Friday, and said Ms. Murray will be there to testify. Mr. Jackson said he is also thinking about sending City Attorney Driskell to testify as well, adding that last year it was the house finance committee where it hit a snag. Mr. Jackson said the next step for the gender segregation bill 6443 is to be heard by the full senate, although he hasn't heard of a date or time yet. Mr. Jackson also said that he asked Ms. Murray to monitor the public facilities district bill. Concerning the sportsplex, Mr. Jackson said we are working on the tourism study for Spokane Valley; that he attended a workshop and a draft plan should be available in March or April; said the first phase will identify specific projects to move forward for more study and we should have those done by August or September. Councilmember Hafner mentioned that the County is planning for this as a ballot issue in 2016 but that he feels Council needs to wait to consider moving forward until the study has been completed. Other Councilmembers nodded in agreement. Mr. Jackson said he visited with Spokane County Library District Director Nancy Ledeboer who told him the Board is a few months away from serious consideration of going back out for another ballot; that they are engaging the services of an architect to look at the existing building and see what expansion and remodeling would look like and to compare that with the possibility of a new facility; he said they indicated it will take some time. Mr. Jackson mentioned the concern with the Sullivan Bridge work and that the river is coming up close to the temporary work area; he said they closed access under the bridge and are notifying all the river users; said he might be coming back with a resolution enabling that closure if needed. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 8:52 p.m. ATTEST: L.R. Higgins, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Council Study Session: 02-02-2016 Page 4 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT MINUTES City of Spokane Valley City Council Regular Meeting Formal Meeting Format Tuesday, February 9, 2016 Mayor Higgins called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Attendance: Rod Higgins, Mayor Arne Woodard, Deputy Mayor Dean Grafos, Councilmember Chuck Hafner, Councilmember Ed Pace, Councilmember Sam Wood, Councilmember Bill Gothmann, Councilmember Pro Tem Staff Mike Jackson, City Manager Mark Calhoun, Deputy City Manager Cary Driskell, City Attorney Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney Mike Stone, Parks & Recreation Director John Hohman, Community & Econ. Dev Dir. Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director Erik Guth, Public Works Director Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk INVOCATION: Pastor Bill Dropko, Greenacres Christian Fellowship Church gave the invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Council, staff and audience rose for the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the agenda. INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: Mayor Higgins recognized Shriner Potentate John Robertson, then read a proclamation for Burn Awareness Week. Mr. Robertson accepted the proclamation with thanks COMMITTEE, BOARD, LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS: Councilmember Wood: said he attended a Chamber Government Affairs meeting where they discussed initiative 732 regarding a Carbon Tax proposal that he said will probably show up on a ballot, and if approved would be about a 22¢ a gallon increase; went to the Home Builders Government Affairs meeting; and attended the Hotel/Motel Association meeting this afternoon. Councilmember Hafner: mentioned the STA (Spokane Transit Authority) Performance and Planning Committee; talked about program mobility training to train people on how to catch a bus as opposed to calling a cab which is much more expensive; also talked about how to fund that training; discussed bus replacement which must be done every fifteen years; mentioned the structure of bus use for special events like Valleyfest; said the STA Board determined that fares have to provide at least 20% of the cost of STA, and for about the last two years, it was at 18-19% so there is a possibility of a future raise in bus passes; attended the Health Board meeting where they discussed the enforcing of vaping laws similar to smoking laws; went to the 9-1-1 Board where they discussed the renewal of the 1/10 of 1% sales tax increase which previously helped restore Crime Check; said that he attended the groundbreaking for the Evergreen kids what went to the old University High School; and also attended a SCOPE Board meeting. Councilmember Pace: said he also attended the Chamber Government Affairs meeting where they heard about a carbon tax, and said neither he nor the committee is in favor of that measure; went to the Chamber Transportation Committee meeting where they heard a report from the airport director, and said it is exciting to hear about their self -funding operations; went to an STA Planning meeting where they Minutes Regular Council Meeting: 02-09-2016 Page 1 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT examined some charts for projects, but said there are almost no projects in Spokane Valley or even Liberty Lake; went to a Spokane Regional Transportation Council Meeting (SRTC) where they gave a painfully detailed description/discussion on how to pick alternates for the transportation and advisory committee; went to the Homebuilder's Association Government Affairs meeting today; and went to the Spokane Restaurant Lodging Association meeting. Councilmember Gothmann- reported that he attended a Visit Spokane orientation meeting followed by a board meeting where they discussed Spokane City's ordinance regarding immigration status and their city as a sanctuary city, and a position paper the group voted on concerning the topic and in support of Spokane's existing ordinance barring Spokane's Police Force from inquiring into immigration status unless otherwise required by law; and said based on this Council's recent resolution, he did not vote for that position. Councilmember Gothmann distributed copies of Spokane's Ordinance relating to use of immigration status. Councilmember Gothmann also mentioned he and Deputy Mayor Woodard and City Attorney Driskell went to Olympia to testify to the finance committee concerning the City's proposed law regarding lien nuisance abatement; also mentioned the selection of candidates for the Board of County Commissioners to fill recently vacated Todd Mielke's position, which selection is done by the Republication PCO (Precinct Committee Officers), and those candidates included Nancy McLaughlin, Josh Kerns, and Jeff Baxter. Councilmember Grafos: no report. Deputy Mayor Woodard: said he spent some time in Olympia over the last two weeks trying to get the nuisance abatement law passed; attended several Chamber of Commerce meetings; had a governance meeting where they are going back through the Governance Manual and trying to work through sections there, said there are a lot of corrections yet on grammar; and attended the Commute Trip Reduction awards. MAYOR'S REPORT: Reported that late last month he also went to Olympia; participated in the Lilac Coronation and competition downtown; went to the Spokane County Clean Air meeting; and attended the Fire District 8 Banquet. PUBLIC COMMENTS: After Mayor Higgins went over the "ground rules" for making public comment, he invited members of the public to speak. Tony Lazanis: said his area doesn't have any sidewalks and he hopes Council will try to get some funding to start some sidewalks. Kriscinda Marshall: regarding previous approval of sidewalks on Blake, said that two nights ago there was a T-bone accident at 3rd and Blake; asked Council to re -consider not putting in sidewalks; she wants to know when, where and what time is the next CDBG (Community Development Block Grant) meeting. Pam Almedia, Meals on Wheels: she extended thanks again for the funding assistance as a result of the November windstorm damage. Michael Myers: said he is disappointed there have been no residential street improvements; mentioned a growing sinkhole at Raymond and Main in front of Spokane Valley United Methodist Church; said he reported it earlier but nothing has been done and it is getting bigger. John Harding: said he just heard about the proposed new City Hall and he questioned whether is a wise investment; said he would like some feedback; mentioned the use of $6 million from reserve funds and said he would like to see some taxpayer input. Gabriel Chambers: regarding sidewalks for Blake Road; said he knows the sidewalk will connect to Appleway Trail and there have been a lot of dangerous people on that and he has seen some things that were very unpleasant, and if those things occurred in his neighborhood, he'd feel very unsafe. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Amended 2016 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) — Steve Worley Mayor Higgins opened the public hearing at 6:40 p.m., after which Mr. Worley explained the purpose of the hearing, all as noted on his February 9, 2016 Request for Council Action form. Mayor Higgins invited Minutes Regular Council Meeting: 02-09-2016 Page 2 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT public comment, and Mr. Tony Lazanis mentioned something about putting up bridges. There were no other comments and the hearing was closed at 6:43 p.m. 2. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. Proposed Motion: I move to approve the Consent Agenda. a. Approval of claim vouchers on Feb 9, 2016 Request for Council Action Form, Totaling: $1,479,020.31 b. Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending January 31, 2016: $410,578.54 c. Proposed Resolution 16-004, Appointment of Alternates to Spokane Transit Authority d. Approval of January 19, 2016 Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session e. Approval of January 26, 2016 Council Meeting Minutes, Formal Format It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the Consent Agenda. NEW BUSINESS: 3. Second Reading Ordinance 16-001 Vacating 3rd Avenue — Karen Kendall After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded to approve Ordinance 16-001. Planner Kendall explained and showed on the overhead map, the area in question, and mentioned that there will be no cost to the requestor and that the public interest will be served, all as noted in the ordinance. Mayor Higgins invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. 4. Second Reading Ordinance 16-002 Mining Moratorium Findings of Fact — Erik Lamb After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded to approve Ordinance 16-002 adopting findings of fact justfing a six-month renewal of the moratorium on mining and mineral product manufacturing, originally adopted pursuant to Ordinance No. 15-013, with modifications. Deputy City Attorney Lamb explained that these findings are required by state law, and he mentioned the modifications which will further the desire that this moratorium not impact any existing mining business. Mayor Higgins invited public comment. Jana McDonald representing CPM and John Pederson, representing Spokane County, both individually thanked Council for the revisions to the moratorium. There were no further comments. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. 5. Second Reading Ordinance 16-003 Extending Mining Moratorium — Erik Lamb After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded to approve Ordinance 16-003, adopting a six-month renewal of the moratorium on mining and mineral product manufacturing, originally adopted pursuant to Ordinance No. 15-013, with modifications. After Mr. Lamb explained that this is the companion ordinance to the previous ordinance, and mentioned the SM -6 permit clause in the ordinance, Mayor Higgins invited public comment. Jana McDonald representing CPM and John Pederson, representing Spokane County, both individually thanked Council for the revisions to the moratorium. There were no further comments. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. 6. Proposed Resolution 16-005 Amending 2016 TIP — Steve Worley It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded to approve Resolution 16-005, adopting the 2016 amended TIP. Mr. Worley said this would adopt the amended TIP, which was the topic of tonight's public hearing. When asked about the Blake sidewalk project, Mr. Worley confirmed that is not part of this TIP and that project would come later. Mayor Higgins invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. Minutes Regular Council Meeting: 02-09-2016 Page 3 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT 7. Proposed Resolution 16-006 Authorizing Intermittent Closing of the Spokane River — Cary Driskell It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded to approve Resolution 16-006 regarding restrictions on use of the Spokane River relating to the Sullivan Road bridge construction project. City Attorney Driskell explained that this would allow the City to help protect the public as it relates to the construction zone near the Sullivan Bridge and still allow the public to use the area when appropriate and safe. A question arose about the Centennial Trail, and Mr. Driskell said this does not affect the trail. Mayor Higgins invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mayor Higgins invited public comments; no comments were offered. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: 8. Governance Manual — Councilmember Hafner Councilmember Hafner said he hopes at the end of tonight's discussion, either by consensus or motion at the next meeting, to reaffirm resolution 15-007, which was adopted August 11, 2015, adopting the Governance Manual; said his rationale for this is Council adopted these rules and procedures since 2003, with numerous changes; that a process was followed and that Council needs to continue to follow that process; that rules and procedures were chosen to increase meeting efficiency and effectiveness and manage conflict, and to ensure that meetings run smoothly and follow a generally accepted format; and that Council needs to adhere to its own rules of conduct, which he said in many instances in the past has not been the case by a majority of Council; so he would like to re -affirm by consensus or motion later, that Council will follow them or make changes through the governance committee and follow the process. Councilmember Pace said he agrees, noted that page 45 mentions the purpose of this is, it is a set of guidelines not rules, and that Council can suspend them if they want; said the Committee is working on some changes and additions which will be brought to the entire Council; said he supports the manual as it is a useful tool; said he doesn't think conflict is a bad thing, that it is healthy and provides energy that gets things done; but agrees Council should follow the governance manual. Mayor Higgins suggested that we take everything up at the same time, including all the amendments; and Councilmember Hafner agreed, provided he said, that Council follow the process. Councilmember Hafner said if these are not procedures, maybe we should change the title, as it states these are rules and procedures. Councilmember Gothmann said he agrees conflict is fine when it is in policy, but when there is conflict in procedures, that could be a problem; said the rules are rules of order and are an expansion of Roberts Rules of Order, which Council can suspend by majority vote; but the purpose of the manual is to eliminate procedure conflict; and said he is anxious to work on these together. Councilmember Grafos said it is important to follow the manual and he looks forward to seeing the changes. Deputy Mayor Woodard and Councilmember Wood agreed. 9. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins Mayor Higgins mentioned the Chamber of Commerce's BIG 5 program and that the Chamber would like a Councilmember to represent each of those five sections, for example, perhaps Councilmember Hafner could be on the education part; and he asked Council to think about it and get back to him and he would make a formal appointment later. INFORMATION ONLY Items (10) Operations & Administrative Quarterly Report, (11) Parks & Recreation Quarterly Report, (12) Windstorm Funding to Outside Agencies, and (13) Contract for Comprehensive Plan Update, were all for information only and were not reported or discussed. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS Minutes Regular Council Meeting: 02-09-2016 Page 4 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT Mr. Jackson said that in November 2014, we contracted for our own transfer services with Sunshine, and negotiated contracts with Sunshine and Waste Management as haulers; said the current contracts end March 31, 2018; said we are starting well in advance and have issued an RFP (request for proposals) for collection services; he said all this would come under a competitive process; said that the RFP is out now and will close February 18, and March 22 this item will come before Council for discussion. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed, to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 7:08 p.m. ATTEST: L.R. Higgins, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Minutes Regular Council Meeting: 02-09-2016 Page 5 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT Attendance: Councilmembers MINUTES SPOKANE VALLEY COUNCIL MEETING STUDY SESSION Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers Spokane Valley, Washington February 16, 2016 Staff Rod Higgins, Mayor Arne Woodard, Deputy Mayor Dean Grafos, Councilmember Chuck Hafner, Councilmember Ed Pace, Councilmember Sam Wood, Councilmember Bill Gothmann, Councilmember Pro Tem Mike Jackson, City Manager Cary Driskell, City Attorney Mark Calhoun, Deputy City Manager John Hohman, Comm. & Economic Dev. Dir. Mike Stone, Parks & Recreation Director Steve Worley, Capital Improvemt. Progrm Mgr Gloria Mantz, Economic Development Engineer Rick VanLeuven, Police Chief Carolbelle Branch, Public Information Officer Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Mayor Higgins called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present. 1. City Hall Update — John Hohman Director Hohman introduced Mr. Steve Roth from Architects West, to assist in tonight's informal status update of the city hall design. Mr. Hohman encouraged Council to ask questions; he mentioned the various materials and photos around the room, including the large book of plans and specifications, and said if any Councilmember wants a copy, to please contact him, adding that this is a 95% complete set of plans. As background, Mr. Hohman explained that a new city hall has been a Council goal since 2009; that the real process we are working on now began in 2012; said there was Council discussion about building the project, where to look, how much it would cost; and based on Council direction, staff analyzed existing properties for sale after which Council determined there was not an available existing building to meet our needs and therefore, chose the U -city property, which was purchased in December of 2014 after an extended negotiation process. Mr. Hohman said that the design process was kicked off in March of this year; the architect met with Council in April; a meeting was held May 6 at CenterPlace to gather public input; and Council approved the design concept in September. Mr. Hohman said that the set of plans and specificaitons have been reviewed in detail by his and Public Works' staff. Tonight, Mr. Hohman said, he seeks Council's guidance on the rest of the process. Via the PowerPoint presentation, Mr. Roth showed photos and concepts and explained some of the aspects of the exterior views and floorplans of the proposed building, including many views of the Council Chambers. He said that as they moved through the process, they found ways to cut costs and make it as efficient as possible, and he brought Council's attention to the materials on the table. He said that the area would also include an eight -foot fence to secure the city -owned vehicles; that the least expensive fence would be chain link with slates which would help conceal the vehicles as well as the transformer and dumpster area. He explained that an alternate fence would be of steel, which is more durable but also more expensive, and that these are some of the things Council can accept or reject once the bids come in. In response to Councilmember Hafner's question about building maintenance, Mr. Roth said that they chose materials that represent low maintenance but still in keeping with that Council wanted; said the outside would not require painting, and the majority of the wood on the outside is covered by canopies; said there is nothing specialized about the inside materials as they are typical and can be easily obtained. Councilmember Wood asked about the proximity of the permit counter spaces to each other and whether there would be enough room for some privacy. Mr. Hohman assured him that Council Study Session: 02-16-2016 Page 1 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT there is ample room so as not to crowd people together in the area, and if a more private setting is needed, there are two additional conference rooms to the west of the reception desk. Mr. Roth said the areas would be separated by a solid partition as well. Mr. Roth then briefly went over the list of alternates. There was brief discussion about insulation, interior colors, room for additional future staff if needed, and that much effort went into the plan to make it as efficient as possible with minimal empty space. Mayor Higgins called for a twenty -minute recess at 7:05 in order to give Council time to examine the photos and materials. Mayor Higgins reconvened the meeting at 7:22 p.m. 2. Comprehensive Plan Contract Update — John Hohman Director Hohman reviewed the phases of the Comprehensive Plan update, and said that staff selected Van Ness Feldman as the consultant for this third phase, Development of Draft Plan and Regulations. Mr. Hohman said that the Consultant will assist with the completion of the final Comprehensive Plan and prepare regulations to implement the Plan; he went over the Scope of work as shown in the attached documents; mentioned there is a state mandate that this task must be completed by June 2017; and that we started working early but the lack of a population allocation was an issue for a while. Mr. Hohman mentioned the various public meetings, Planning Commission meetings, and Council meetings where this issue was a topic. He also noted Council would be discussing goals and policies later in the process. The cost of this phase, Mr. Hohman stated, is $336,500 as it brings three consultant teams together to complete the update, with Van Ness Feldman as lead, and added that Mr. Tadas Kisielius, with his outstanding legal expertise, will be heavily involved. Mr. Hohman explained that the consultant will write the comprehensive plan and development regulations as we simply do not have existing staff to devote to that project as most of his staff is working on residential construction and the various other areas associated with his department; he said the entire document will be heavily focused on economic development and the majority costs are associated with community attributes, again mentioning the tremendous amount of experience this consultant brings with them, and reminding Council of the excellent work this consultant performed in working with our Shoreline Management Program. Mr. Hohman also noted that the Comprehensive Plan will include a heavy focus on land use, from multi- family and commercial, to other areas such as office, and the consultant will complete all the remaining elements as needed. In addition, Mr. Hohman noted that Mr. Kisielius will make sure our document is legal and defensible to ensure we will meet any legal challenges; said two to three months after this, he hopes to have a Council/Planning Commission workshop on input and is projecting to have the consultant team at a Planning Commission meeting to provide support and answer questions about how each element came together. Once all this passes through the Planning Commission, Mr. Hohman said he will have the consultant speak at a Council meeting. Staff will support the process as needed, and Mr. Hohman said they are working on the EIS (environmental impact statement) and trying to get as much public input as possible. Depending on the actual start time, Mr. Hohman said the Planning Commission draft should be complete in August. Council Gothmann asked how this firm was selected and Mr. Hohman explained that staff uses the RFP (request for proposals) process in looking for professional services; that we learned a lot through the completion of the Shoreline Master Program and found the Van Ness Feldman a firm that can do the work and knows what needs to be done; said they provided excellent guidance and work before; that staff is aware of other qualified firms, but as Van Ness Feldman did the first two phases, staff felt we should stay with them as lead. Council concurred. 3. Sullivan/Euclid Concrete Project — Steve Worley Capital Improvement Program Manager Worley explained about the possible federal STP (Surface Transportation Program) grant funds for our Sullivan -Euclid Concrete Intersection Project. Mr. Worley explained that his project has been in the six-year TIP (Transportation Improvement Program) many times; and staff has been designing that project with federal funds since 2010. Mr. Worley said we only had design phase money and not funds for the construction phase, so the project sat on the back burner. He explained that over time, that project has become 90% designed. With that in mind, Mr. Worley said Council Study Session: 02-16-2016 Page 2 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT the question now is, do we accept this potential offer of $1.2 million and come up with the difference between what we originally asked, or accept this and go after more grant money to make up that difference. Mr. Worley said that if the City had to pay for all the difference, the figure would be $978,875; however, if we were successful in obtaining TIB (Transportation Improvement Board) funds, that could bring the City match down to $319,125. Mr. Worley also noted that TIB is a competitive process so there is no guarantee we would receiving funding, but that there are some ways to improve our application to score more points, such as adding a bicycle facility, LED lights, not traffic signals but any other lights in that intersection, and another component addressing greenhouse gas emissions. He explained that with this $1.2 million, that makes our construction readiness that much better. He added that the intersection is in poor condition and if we accept this offer for $1.2 million, we would rebuild the intersection in concrete. Mr. Worley noted that the TIB grants are usually done later in the year. The question of available REET (real estate excise tax) funds came up and Mr. Jackson said this project would not create a deficit for the City and it looks like a good risk to move forward with the $1.2 million. Mr. Worley added that we have been very successful in the past with TIB grants, and feel this project would fit well under their preservation program. There was Council discussion about the greenhouse and bicycle facility with Councilmember Pace feeling we don't need those items, and Councilmember Gothmann feeling we do since the bicycle facility would be covered by the grant and would not cost our citizens. Councilmember Gothmann suggested staff try for all aspects, and at least look at a greenhouse gas policy. There was general Council consensus to move forward with accepting this $1.2 million and add the bicycle facility and LED lights; and to bring back a greenhouse gas emissions policy for future discussion. 4. Restaurant Regulatory Roadmap — Gloria Mantz Economic Development Engineer Mantz briefed Council on the pilot program to assist prospective restaurant entrepreneurs in our area. Ms. Mantz showed Council the Regulatory Roadmap Restaurant section on our website; and explained the various aspects and steps of opening a successful restaurant, and of how helpful this website can be with everything needed, all in one convenient place. She mentioned that the website supports our on-going efforts to streamline our permitting process, assist businesses, and provide customer service. 5. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins There were no suggested changes to the Advance Agenda. 6. LED Lights This item was for informational purposes only and was not discussed or reported. 7. Council Comments — Mayor Higgins Councilmember Gothmann extended thanks and appreciation to the crews sweeping the streets; to the Sheriff's and Police Departments for handling a recent bogus bomb threat at Greenacres Middle School: and to the Central Valley School District for conducting a phone survey about changing some school boundaries. Councilmember Pace mentioned the draft letter before Council, to Senator Andy Billig concerning our City's support of Senate Bill 6215 concerning clarifying water rights for municipal water supply purposes. Councilmember Pace said the bill has moved from the Rules Committee to the floor and he is hoping it will pass, and that Council is asking the City's lobbyist if she would help with this, and if Council approves the Mayor signing this letter to send to Senator Billig. Councilmember Wood mentioned that Senator Padden worked hard on this issue of municipal and irrigation water rights. Councilmember Grafos said he would like to read the bill as he is not familiar with it but realizes water rights are a major concern in this state. Councilmember Hafner mentioned that he too is unfamiliar with this bill. After brief discussion, except for Councilmembers Grafos and Hafner, there was Council consensus to have the Mayor sign and send the letter of support. Council Study Session: 02-16-2016 Page 3 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT Mayor Higgins said he mentioned last week about a request he received from the President of the Chamber of Commerce for our City to appoint a Councilmember to each of their BIG 5 sections; and he proposed appointing Councilmember Hafner to Greater Learning; Councilmember Pace to Greater Good; Councilmember Wood to Greater Outdoors, Deputy Mayor Woodard to Greater Vision, and himself to Greater Cures. Those Councilmembers agreed with the selections. 8. City Manager Comments — Mike Jackson City Manager Jackson mentioned adding a motion to next week's agenda to move forward for the plans for City Hall. There were no objections from Council. Mr. Jackson also noted that he has been sending and receiving information to Lobbyist Briahna Murray on the legislative update; said that House Bill 2519, the City's nuisance abatement bill, has passed the House and another version of the bill passed the Senate, so both bills will continue, and said he is hopeful one will be passed. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 8:40 p.m. ATTEST: L.R. Higgins, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Council Study Session: 02-16-2016 Page 4 of 4 Approved by Council: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: February 23, 2016 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ['consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ['executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Comprehensive Plan Contract GOVERNING LEGISLATION: The Growth Management Act (GMA) RCW 36.70A. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: Per RCW 36.70A.130(1), every county and city in the state is required to conduct an update of its Comprehensive Plan and development regulations every eight years. Although the City of Spokane Valley's update is due no later than June 30, 2017, the City began the process in 2014. The update of the Comprehensive Plan will be completed in three phases. For the first phase, Development of Public Participation Program and Community Visioning, the City selected Van Ness Feldman. The tasks in this phase consisted of compiling existing conditions and documents, developing the Public Participation Program, and completing the community visioning process. These tasks were completed in April 2015. The second phase, Analysis of Land Quantity and Economic Trends, consisted of preparing Land Quantity Analysis (LQA) information, preparing and analyzing existing conditions, assisting with the Citizen -Initiated Amendment Request process, conducting a Comprehensive Plan audit, and providing recommendations on the State Environmental Protection Policy Act (SEPA) Threshold Determination. These tasks were completed in November 2015. In the third phase, Development of Draft Plan and Regulations and Adoption of Final Plan and Regulations, the Consultant will develop a draft plan and regulations and assist in the SEPA environmental review process. The Consultant will assist with the completion of the final Comprehensive Plan and prepare regulations to implement the Comprehensive Plan. Staff has selected Van Ness Feldman to complete the third phase of the plan update. OPTIONS: Authorize approval of the contract, or take other appropriate action. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the Agreement for Professional Services with Van Ness Feldman for the update of the Comprehensive Plan, Phase Three. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The contract amount for the third phase of the Comprehensive Plan update is $336,500. STAFF CONTACT: John Hohman, Community and Economic Development Director ATTACHMENTS: Professional Services Agreement AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Van Ness Feldman 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update Contract No. 16-030 THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between the City of Spokane Valley, a code City of the State of Washington, hereinafter "City" and Van Ness Feldman, hereinafter "Consultant," jointly referred to as "Parties." IN CONSIDERATION of the terms and conditions contained herein, the Parties agree as follows: 1. Work to Be Performed. Consultant shall provide all labor, services, and material to satisfactorily complete the Scope of Services, attached as Exhibit A. A. Administration. The City Manager or designee shall administer and be the primary contact for Consultant. Prior to commencement of work, Consultant shall contact the City Manager or designee to review the Scope of Services, schedule, and date of completion. Upon notice from the City Manager or designee, Consultant shall commence work, perform the requested tasks in the Scope of Services, stop work, and promptly cure any failure in performance under this Agreement. B. Representations. City has relied upon the qualifications of Consultant in entering into this Agreement. By execution of this Agreement, Consultant represents it possesses the ability, skill, and resources necessary to perform the work and is familiar with all current laws, rules, and regulations which reasonably relate to the Scope of Services. No substitutions of agreed-upon personnel shall be made without the prior written consent of City. Consultant represents that the compensation as stated in paragraph 3 is adequate and sufficient for the timely provision of all professional services required to complete the Scope of Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall be responsible for the technical accuracy of its services and documents resulting therefrom, and City shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies therein. Consultant shall correct such deficiencies without additional compensation except to the extent such action is directly attributable to deficiencies in City -furnished information. C. Standard of Care. Consultant shall exercise the degree of skill and diligence normally employed by professional consultants engaged in the same profession, and performing the same or similar services at the time such services are performed. D. Modifications. City may modify this Agreement and order changes in the work whenever necessary or advisable. Consultant shall accept modifications when ordered in writing by the City Manager or designee, so long as the additional work is within the scope of Consultant's area of practice. Compensation for such modifications or changes shall be as mutually agreed between the Parties. Consultant shall make such revisions in the work as are necessary to correct errors or omissions appearing therein when required to do so by City without additional compensation. 2. Term of Contract. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect upon execution and shall remain in effect until completion of all contractual requirements have been met as determined by City. Consultant shall Agreement for Professional Services (with professional liability coverage) Page 1 of 7 complete its work by December 31, 2016, unless the time for performance is extended in writing by the Parties. Either Party may terminate this Agreement for material breach after providing the other Party with at least 10 days' prior notice and an opportunity to cure the breach. City may, in addition, terminate this Agreement for any reason by 10 days' written notice to Consultant. In the event of termination without breach, City shall pay Consultant for all work previously authorized and satisfactorily performed prior to the termination date. 3. Compensation. City agrees to pay Consultant $336,500, (which includes Washington State Sales Tax if any is applicable) as full compensation for everything done under this Agreement, as set forth in Exhibit B. Consultant shall not perform any extra, further, or additional services for which it will request additional compensation from City without a prior written agreement for such services and payment therefore. 4. Payment. Consultant shall be paid monthly upon presentation of an invoice to City. Applications for payment shall be sent to the City Finance Department at the below -stated address. City reserves the right to withhold payment under this Agreement for that portion of the work (if any) which is determined in the reasonable judgment of the City Manager or designee to be noncompliant with the Scope of Services, City standards, City Code, and federal or state standards. 5. Notice. Notices other than applications for payment shall be given in writing as follows: TO THE CITY: Name: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Phone: (509) 921-1000 Address: 11707 East Sprague Ave., Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 TO THE CONSULTANT: Name: Van Ness Feldman, Tadas Kisielius Phone: (206) 623-9372 Address: 719 Second Avenue, Suite 1150 Seattle, WA 98104 6. Applicable Laws and Standards. The Parties, in the performance of this Agreement, agree to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. Consultant warrants that its designs, construction documents, and services shall conform to all federal, state, and local statutes and regulations. 7. Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters — Primary Covered Transactions. A. By executing this Agreement, the Consultant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief that it and its principals: 1. Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any federal department or agency; 2. Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (federal, state, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of federal or state antitrust statues or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; 3. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (federal, state, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in Agreement for Professional Services (with professional liability coverage) Page 2 of 7 paragraph (A)(2) of this certification; and 4. Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public transactions (federal, state, or local) terminated for cause or default. B. Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this Agreement. 8. Relationship of the Parties. It is understood and agreed that Consultant shall be an independent contractor and not the agent or employee of City, that City is interested in only the results to be achieved, and that the right to control the particular manner, method, and means in which the services are performed is solely within the discretion of Consultant. Any and all employees who provide services to City under this Agreement shall be deemed employees solely of Consultant. The Consultant shall be solely responsible for the conduct and actions of all its employees under this Agreement and any liability that may attach thereto. 9. Ownership of Documents. All drawings, plans, specifications, and other related documents prepared by Consultant under this Agreement are and shall be the property of City, and may be subject to disclosure pursuant to chapter 42.56 RCW or other applicable public record laws. The written, graphic, mapped, photographic, or visual documents prepared by Consultant under this Agreement shall, unless otherwise provided, be deemed the property of City. City shall be permitted to retain these documents, including reproducible camera-ready originals of reports, reproduction quality mylars of maps, and copies in the form of computer files, for the City's use. City shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose, distribute, and otherwise use, in whole or in part, any reports, data, drawings, images, or other material prepared under this Agreement, provided that Consultant shall have no liability for the use of Consultant's work product outside of the scope of its intended purpose. 10. Records. The City or State Auditor or any of their representatives shall have full access to and the right to examine during normal business hours all of Consultant's records with respect to all matters covered in this Agreement. Such representatives shall be permitted to audit, examine, make excerpts or transcripts from such records, and to make audits of all contracts, invoices, materials, payrolls, and record of matters covered by this Agreement for a period of three years from the date final payment is made hereunder. 11. Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors. A. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Consultant shall obtain insurance of the types described below: 1. Automobile liability insurance covering all owned, non -owned, hired, and leased vehicles. Coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage. 2. Commercial general liability insurance shall be at least as broad as ISO occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall cover liability arising from premises, operations, stop -gap independent contractors and personal injury, and advertising injury. City shall be named as an additional insured under Consultant's commercial general liability insurance policy with respect to the work performed for the City using an additional insured endorsement at least as broad as ISO CG 20 26. Agreement for Professional Services (with professional liability coverage) Page 3 of 7 3. Workers' compensation coverage as required by the industrial insurance laws of the State of Washington. 4. Professional liability insurance appropriate to Consultant's profession. B. Minimum Amounts of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain the following insurance limits: 1. Automobile liability insurance with a minimum combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage of no less than $1,000,000 per accident. 2. Commercial general liability insurance shall be written with limits no less than $1,000,000 for each occurrence, and $2,000,000 for general aggregate. 3. Professional liability insurance shall be written with limits no less than $1,000,000 per claim and $1,000,000 policy aggregate limit. C. Other Insurance Provisions. The policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions for automobile liability, professional liability, and commercial general liability insurance: 1. Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance with respect to the City. Any insurance, self-insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by City shall be in excess of Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 2. Consultant shall fax or send electronically in .pdf format a copy of insurer's cancellation notice within two business days of receipt by Consultant. 3. If Consultant maintains higher insurance limits than the minimums shown above, City shall be insured for the full available limits of commercial general and excess or umbrella liability maintained by Consultant, irrespective of whether such limits maintained by Consultant are greater than those required by this Agreement or whether any certificate of insurance furnished to the City evidences limits of liability lower than those maintained by Consultant. 4. Failure on the part of Consultant to maintain the insurance as required shall constitute a material breach of the Agreement, upon which the City may, after giving at least five business days' notice to Consultant to correct the breach, immediately terminate the Agreement, or at its sole discretion, procure or renew such insurance and pay any and all premiums in connection therewith, with any sums so expended to be repaid to City on demand, or at the sole discretion of the City, offset against funds due Consultant from the City. D. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not less than A:VII. E. Evidence of Coverage. As evidence of the insurance coverages required by this Agreement, Consultant shall furnish acceptable insurance certificates to the City Clerk at the time Consultant returns the signed Agreement, which shall be Exhibit C. The certificate shall specify all of the parties who are additional insureds, and shall include applicable policy endorsements, and the deduction or retention level. Insuring companies or entities are subject to City acceptance. If requested, complete copies of insurance policies shall be provided to City. Consultant shall be fmancially responsible for all pertinent deductibles, self-insured retentions, and/or self-insurance. Agreement for Professional Services (with professional liability coverage) Page 4 of 7 F. Failure to Maintain Insurance. Failure on the part of the Consultant to maintain the insurance as required shall constitute a material breach of contract, upon which the City may, after giving at least five days' written notice to Consultant to cure the breach, immediately terminate the Agreement, or at the City's discretion, procure or renew such insurance and pay any and all premiums in connection therewith, with any sums so expended to be repaid to the City on demand, or at the sole discretion of the City, offset against funds due the Consultant from the City. G. City Full Availability of Consultant's Insurance Limits. If the Consultant maintains higher insurance limits than the minimums shown above, the City shall be insured for the full available limits of commercial general and excess or umbrella liability maintained by the Consultant, irrespective of whether such limits maintained by the Consultant are greater than those required by this Agreement or whether any certificate of insurance furnished to the City evidences limits of liability lower than those maintained by the Consultant. 12. Conflicts. To comply with the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct (RPCs), Consultant maintains a conflict of interest index identifying all of Consultant's current and former clients. Based on the scope of services Exhibit A, Consultant reviewed the City against Consultant's conflict of interest index. Consultant has four existing clients that required further review. These entities are listed in Exhibit D. Consultant has conducted an internal review and has concluded that it is reasonable for Consultant to represent the City of Spokane Valley and the entities listed in Exhibit D upon full disclosure and written consent. Exhibit D provides full disclosure of the representation ofthe entities listed and the Consultant's analysis ofthe potential for conflicts. By signing this Agreement, City confirms in writing its informed consent to the continued representation of the entities listed in Exhibit D. Specifically, City agrees that Consultant's continued work for entities listed in Exhibit D is on matters unrelated to Consultant's work for the City and would not materially limit Consultant's responsibilities to the City and further would not materially limit Consultant's responsibilities to the entities listed in Exhibit D. 13. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. Consultant shall, at its sole expense, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless City and its officers, agents, and employees, from any and all claims, actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, attorney's fees, costs of litigation, expenses, injuries, and damages of any nature whatsoever relating to or arising out of the wrongful or negligent acts, errors, or omissions in the services provided by Consultant, Consultant's agents, subcontractors, subconsultants, and employees to the fullest extent permitted by law, subject only to the limitations provided below. Consultant's duty to defend, indemnify, and hold City harmless shall not apply to liability for damages arising out of such services caused by or resulting from the sole negligence of City or City's agents or employees pursuant to RCW 4.24.115. Consultant's duty to defend, indemnify, and hold City harmless against liability for damages arising out of such services caused by the concurrent negligence of (a) City or City's agents or employees, and (b) Consultant, Consultant's agents, subcontractors, subconsultants, and employees shall apply only to the extent of the negligence of Consultant, Consultant's agents, subcontractors, subconsultants, and employees. Consultant's duty to defend, indemnify, and hold City harmless shall include, as to all claims, demands, losses, and liability to which it applies, City's personnel -related costs, reasonable attorneys' fees, the reasonable value of any services rendered by the office of the City Attorney, outside consultant costs, court costs, fees for collection, and all other claim -related expenses. Agreement for Professional Services (with professional liability coverage) Page 5 of 7 Consultant specifically and expressly waives any immunity that may be granted it under the Washington State Industrial Insurance Act, Title 51 RCW. These indemnification obligations shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages, compensation, or benefits payable to or for any third party under workers' compensation acts, disability benefit acts, or other employee benefits acts. Provided, that Consultant's waiver of immunity under this provision extends only to claims against Consultant by City, and does not include, or extend to, any claims by Consultant's employees directly against Consultant. Consultant hereby certifies that this indemnification provision was mutually negotiated. 14. Waiver. No officer, employee, agent, or other individual acting on behalf of either Party has the power, right, or authority to waive any of the conditions or provisions of this Agreement. A waiver in one instance shall not be held to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach or nonperformance. All remedies afforded in this Agreement or by law shall be taken and construed as cumulative and in addition to every other remedy provided herein or by law. Failure of either Party to enforce at any time any of the provisions of this Agreement or to require at any time performance by the other Party of any provision hereof shall in no way be construed to be a waiver of such provisions nor shall it affect the validity of this Agreement or any part thereof. 15. Assignment and Delegation. Neither Party shall assign, transfer, or delegate any or all of the responsibilities of this Agreement or the benefits received hereunder without prior written consent of the other Party. 16. Subcontracts. Except as otherwise provided herein, Consultant shall not enter into subcontracts for any of the work contemplated under this Agreement without obtaining prior written approval of City. 17. Confidentiality. Consultant may, from time -to -time, receive information which is deemed by City to be confidential. Consultant shall not disclose such information without the prior express written consent of City or upon order of a court of competent jurisdiction. 18. Jurisdiction and Venue. This Agreement is entered into in Spokane County, Washington. Disputes between City and Consultant shall be resolved in the Superior Court of the State of Washington in Spokane County. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Consultant agrees that it may, at City's request, be joined as a party in any arbitration proceeding between City and any third party that includes a claim or claims that arise out of, or that are related to Consultant' s services under this Agreement. Consultant further agrees that the Arbitrator(s)' decision therein shall be final and binding on Consultant and that judgment may be entered upon it in any court having jurisdiction thereof. 19. Cost and Attorney's Fees. The prevailing parry in any litigation or arbitration arising out of this Agreement shall be entitled to its attorney' s fees and costs of such litigation (including expert witness fees). 20. Entire Agreement. This written Agreement constitutes the entire and complete agreement between the Parties and supersedes any prior oral or written agreements. This Agreement may not be changed, modified, or altered except in writing signed by the Parties hereto. 21. Anti -kickback. No officer or employee of City, having the power or duty to perform an official act or action related to this Agreement shall have or acquire any interest in this Agreement, or have solicited, accepted, or granted a present or future gift, favor, service, or other thing of value from any person with an interest in this Agreement. 22. Business Registration. Consultant shall register with the City as a business prior to commencement of Agreement for Professional Services (with professional liability coverage) Page 6 of 7 work under this Agreement if it has not already done so. 23. Severabilitv. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Agreement should be held to be invalid for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect the validity of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Agreement. 24. Exhibits. Exhibits attached and incorporated into this Agreement are: A. Scope of Services B. Fee proposal C. Insurance Certificates D. Review of Conflicts of Interest The Parties have executed this Agreement this _ day of 20 . CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Consultant: Mike Jackson, City Manager By: Its: Authorized Representative ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the City Attorney Agreement for Professional Services (with professional liability coverage) Page 7 of 7 EXHIBIT — A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE PHASE 3 SCOPE OF SERVICES — CONSULTANT RESPONSIBILITIES and BUDGET ESTIMATE 1.0 Summary The City of Spokane Valley is updating its Comprehensive Plan in conformance with RCW 36.70A.130(5). The update consists of three major phases: 1. Phase 1 — Completed: Development of public participation program and community visioning, the Consultant compiled and analyzed existing conditions and documents, developed the Public Participation Program, and completed the community visioning process. 2. Phase 2 — Completed: Analysis of land quantity and economic trends. In this phase, the Consultant prepared Land Quantity Analysis (LQA) information, existing conditions information, assist with the Citizen -Initiated Amendment Request (CAR) process, conducted a Comprehensive Plan audit, and provided a recommendation on the SEPA Threshold Determination. The Consultant also provided assistance and guidance on population allocation issues. 3. Phase 3: Development of draft plan and regulations and adoption of final plan and regulations. The Consultant will prepare the draft Comprehensive Plan elements, any related required draft regulations, and assist in the initiation of SEPA Determination of Significance (DS) and related EIS scoping. The Consultant will then assist with the completion of the Final Comprehensive Plan, and prepare regulations to implement the Comprehensive Plan. 2.0 Scope Phase 3 tasks advance the analysis of the City's opportunities and challenges to the revision, improvement, and development of the draft Comprehensive Plan (including text and map changes) and development regulations for review by the Planning Commission leading to eventual adoption of the updated Plan by the City Council. Tasks are broken into categories, with the consultant team lead designated for each sub -task. In cases where there are multiple consultants involved in a task, the lead consultant team is listed first, with the supporting consultant team listed second. The City is listed as a task lead or support in instances where City Staff is expected to have significant involvement beyond the expected level of involvement. An estimated total budget amount is summarized in the Cost Summary Table. An estimated budget amount is provided for each task. The budget reflects the level of effort needed to accomplish each task based on the current understanding of the project. Task 1: Draft and Final Comprehensive Plan Elements 1.1 Project Management, Support and Coordination Task Lead Cost 1.1.1 Conduct regular check-in with City staff to communicate progress and discuss obstacles or concerns. CAI $4,500 1.1.2 Regular internal communication amongst consultant team to ensure that work is coordinated throughout the process. CAI, VNF, F&P $10,500 1.1.3 Support incorporation of elements of the EIS into Comp Plan Elements, as needed. City, CAI $2,000 1.1.4 Strategic guidance and review for draft elements to ensure consistency with updated development regulations VNF $4,000 Spokane Valley Comp Plan Update 1164195 February 18, 2016 Page 1 of 6 1.2 Plan Design and Organization 1.2.1 Develop a plan prototype that reflects the City's desired look and feel for the final document. CAI, City, VNF $8,000 1.2.2 Determine an appropriate organizational strategy for the plan and create a standard approach for the development of all elements. CAI, City $2,500 1.3 Introduction 1.3.1 Develop content for the introductory chapter based on findings from the existing conditions report and other analyses of key data. CAI, VNF $5,500 1.3.2 Integrate the Community Vision report into the introduction. CAI, City $1,000 1.3.3 Create a matrix compiling all of the plan's goals and policies and indicate where policies within different element are related to assist users with navigating the plan. CAI $3,500 1.4 Implementation 1.4.1 Lead development of preliminary short- and long- term strategies and actions to implement the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. CAI, City $10,000 1.4.2 Support development of preliminary short- and long- term strategies and actions to implement the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. VNF $3,000 1.4.3 Support development of preliminary short- and long- term strategies and actions to implement the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. F&P $2,500 1.5 Transportation Element 1.5.1 Update the SRTC model with revised population/employment forecasts. Run SRTC model to develop future traffic/transit forecast F&P $8,000 1.5.2 Evaluate future level of service for roadway segments and key intersections F&P $22,500 1.5.3 Identify potential transportation improvements needed to accommodate growth and maintain existing LOS F&P $7,500 1.5.4 Develop planning -level cost estimates of transportation projects. F&P $15,000 1.5.5 Document expected revenues and costs of long-term transportation projects F&P $8,000 1.5.6 Document results in a transportation study that can be used to support SEPA review and the final updated transportation element; respond to comments from City staff F&P $11,500 1.5.7 Finalize draft Transportation Element based on comments received from SRTC, WSDOT, Department of Commerce etc. F&P $10,200 1.5.8 Review goals and policies and, where appropriate, draft language to clearly link the element with the City's economic development goals. Ensure consistency with County -wide Planning Policies (CPPB). CAI $1,000 1.6 Natural Environment 1.6.1 Review goals and policies and, where appropriate, draft language to clearly link the element with the City's economic development goals. Ensure consistency with County -wide Planning Policies (CPPB). CAI, City $1,500 1.6.2 Review goals, policies, and regulations from Shoreline Master AECOM N/A' 1 AECOM will contract separately with the City of Spokane Valley for their work in Phase 3. Spokane Valley Comp Plan Update 1164195 February 18, 2016 Page 2 of 6 Program (SMP) to be used in the Comp Plan update of the Natural Environment Element 1.7 Capital Facilities and Public Services Element 1.7.1 Provide support, as needed, for development of element content as well as goals and policies. Ensure consistency with County -wide Planning Policies (CPPs). CAI, City, F&P $4,500 1.7.2 Draft language, where appropriate to clearly link the element with the City's economic development goals. CAI $1,000 1.8 Private and Public Utilities Element 1.8.1 Provide support, as needed, for development of element content as well as goals and policies. Ensure consistency with County -wide Planning Policies (CPPs). City, CAI $2,500 1.8.2 Draft language, where appropriate, to clearly link the element with the City's economic development goals. CAI $1,000 1.9 Parks and Recreation Element 1.9.1 Provide support, as needed, for development of element content as well as goals and policies. Ensure consistency with County -wide Planning Policies (CPPs). City, CAI $2,500 1.9.2 Draft language, where appropriate, to clearly link the element with the City's economic development goals. CAI $1,000 1.10 Land Use 1.10.1 Analyze and plan for the 20 year population forecast.. Provide recommendations on policy direction and assess policy implications based on previous analysis (e.g. existing conditions report; LQA analysis) CAI, VNF, City $9,000 1.10.3 Analyze the performance of commercial corridors and selected land use designations. These are expected to include the Office, Mixed-use and Multifamily zones as well as industrial and mineral resource lands. Potential for urban infill opportunities will also be studied. CAI, City $10,000 1.10.4 Determine if the population allocation changes to the City's development goals will result in the need to revise the existing land use and zoning maps. Collaborate with City staff to determine appropriate locations for map changes and provide mapping support, as needed. City, CAI, VNF $8,000 1.10.6 Develop three land use alternatives to be evaluated through the City's EIS process, using Citizen -Initiated Amendment Request (CAR) applications and other City -determined factors as the basis. CAI, VNF, City $10,500 1.10.7 Identify policy area priorities and develop goals and policies, integrating Comp Plan Audit Workshop results and ensuring consistency with County -wide Planning Policies. CAI, City $4,500 1.10.8 Draft a brief data -rich narrative that accompanies each of the identified policy area priorities to support the associated goals and policies and link land use to the City's economic development goals. CAI $1,500 1.11 Housing Element 1.11.1 Support analysis of housing needs based on population projections and demographic trends. City, CAI $2,500 1.11.2 Identify policy area priorities, such as affordable housing, and develop goals and policies, integrating Comp Plan Audit Workshop results and ensuring consistency with County -wide Planning CAI, City $4,500 Spokane Valley Comp Plan Update 1164195 February 18, 2016 Page 3 of 6 Policies. Task Lead Cost 1.11.3 Draft a brief data -rich narrative that accompanies each of the identified policy area priorities to support the associated goals and policies and link land use to the City's economic development goals. CAI $1,500 1.12 Economic Development Element VNF $24,500 1.12.1 Present an assessment of the Spokane Valley economy based on previous work performed for the City and provide additional analysis, as needed. CAI $4,500 1.12.2 Identify policy area priorities and develop goals and policies, integrating Comp Plan Audit Workshop results and ensuring consistency with County -wide Planning Policies. The goals and policies are intended to serve as the foundation for a future strategic planning effort. CAI, City $4,500 1.12.3 Draft a brief data -rich narrative that accompanies each of the identified policy area priorities to support the associated goals and policies. CAI $1,500 1.13 Draft and Final Plan 1.13.1 Layout all draft content into the template to ensure that the full document has a consistent appearance and tone. CAI $4,500 1.13.2 Refine City -generated context and overview maps for each element that highlight relevant geographic information. City will provide a Map Package through GIS for each map to be edited. City, CAI $3,500 1.13.3 Legal review of draft plan VNF $6,000 Task 2: Draft Development Regulations Task Lead Cost 2.1 Conduct an audit of the development regulations and recommend sections of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) needing to be updated, including SVMC Titles 19, 20, 21, and 22 VNF $12,000 2.2 Revise development regulations as needed, e.g. multi -family, industrial, and/or office zones, consistent with changes to Comp Plan elements and including annexation procedures VNF $24,500 2.3 Review critical areas regulations and incorporate into the SVMC AECOM, City N/Az 2.4 Develop electric vehicle infrastructure (EVI) code language City, VNF $1,000 Task 3: SEPA and EIS coordination Task Lead Cost 3.1 Assist City staff in reviewing comments received on EIS Scoping Notice and the Draft EIS, as necessary City, CAI, VNF, F&P $4,000 3.2 Legal review of Draft EIS and provide comments VNF $6,000 Task 4: Public Meetings and Revisions Task Lead Cost 4.1 Review comments received at public meetings and make revisions as needed City, CAI, VNF, F&P $5,500 4.2 Develop meeting materials to support Planning Commission workshop City, CAI, VNF, F&P $6,500 2 AECOM will contract separately with the City of Spokane Valley for their work in Phase 3. Spokane Valley Comp Plan Update 1164195 February 18, 2016 Page 4 of 6 4.3 Attend and facilitate one workshop held by the Planning Commission to review draft Comp Plan elements and revisions to development regulations CAI, VNF $6,500 4.4 Develop meeting materials to support public open house CAF&P VNF $6,500 4.5 Develop meeting materials to support Planning Commission Study Session CAI, VNF, F&P $6,500 4.6 Attend and facilitate Planning Commission Study Session CAI, VNF $3,500 4.7 Develop meeting materials to support City Council adoption CAF&P VNF $6,500 4.8 Attend and facilitate one City Council meeting for adoption of updated Comp Plan and Development Regulations VNF, F&P $5,000 Cost Summary by Task Category Estimated Cost Consultant Team Van Ness Feldman $111,500 Community Attributes $129,500 Fehr & Peers (costs described above plus $6,300 for direct costs) $91,500 Estimated Phase 3 Total $332,500 Estimated Phase 3 Total including travel fees (Section 3.0 below) $336,500 3.0 TRAVEL FEES 1. It is anticipated that there will be four trips needed to complete Phase 3. The total estimated fee for all travel is an additional $4,000 (VNF and CAI only). Additional meeting support may necessitate additional fees. Note that this includes direct expenses only as labor costs are assumed above. 4.0 CITY RESPONSIBILITIES 1. City staff shall issue SEPA Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice. 2. City staff shall conduct EIS level review for the Comp Plan update. 3. City staff shall coordinate the EIS process with the consultant team, as needed. 4. City shall be responsible for providing and updating inventory information on capital facilities and utilities as well as parks and recreation facilities. The City will assess capacity of capital facilities and services. 5. City staff shall review stormwater regulations and revise if necessary. 6. City staff shall ensure consistency between Shoreline Master Program (SMP) and zoning code. 7. City staff shall create the required Geographic Information System (GIS) datasets for the LQA methodology, zoning, and land use. The City will create and print all maps associated with the update. 8. City staff shall manage public comment and public noticing efforts related to the comment period for the Draft Comprehensive Plan. 9. City staff shall maintain the project record and provide a copy of the index to the consultant team on a quarterly basis. 10. City staff shall maintain a public comment matrix to track all input received and shall provide a copy of the matrix to the Consultant team on a quarterly basis. Spokane Valley Comp Plan Update 1164195 February 18, 2016 Page 5 of 6 11. City staff shall maintain a mailing list of project stakeholders. 12. City staff shall complete the 60 -Day Notice of Intent to Adopt, sent to the WA Dept. of Commerce. 13. City staff shall promptly review and provide feedback for interim work products submitted by the consultant team. 5.0 SCHEDULE 1. Consultant team is planning under the population projection provided by the City. The Phase 3 scope of work and schedule do not address changes or adjustments to this figure which could affect the timing and scope of this Phase. 2. Schedule subject to regular review and adjustment based on project progress. Spokane Valley Comp Plan Update 1164195 February 18, 2016 Page 6 of 6 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: February 23, 2016 Department Director Approval: ❑ Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Mayoral Appointment: Lodging Tax Advisory Committee GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 3.20; RCW 67.28.1817 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: n/a BACKGROUND: Per state statute, the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee shall consist of at least five members: two representatives of businesses required to collect the tax, two members involved in activities authorized to be funded by the tax, and one City Council member. Two vacancies exists: one for a member involved in activities authorized to be funded by the tax, and the other for a member who represents a business required to collect the tax. Appointments may be for one or two years at the discretion of the Mayor. Ads ran for the majority of the month of January and once in February, in the Valley News Herald and the Spokesman Review, and notice of the opening was placed on the City's website. The application deadline was initially January 29, 2016, but since no applications were received by individuals representing a business required to collect the tax, the deadline was extended to February 12, 2016. On August 25, 2015, Charles Stocker was appointed to complete the unexpired term of Herman Meier (recently deceased). Jeff Fiman's (representing Sterling Hospitality/Quality Inn) term ended December 31, 2015; he chose not to re -apply. Applications were received from Colleen Heinselmann, Hampton Inn Suites; Bill Crawford, Spokane Valley Heritage Museum; Ellen Picken, Spokane Arts Fund; and Charles Stocker, The HUB (incumbent), and previously distributed to Council . The current committee consists of Councilmember Wood as Chair, and: Entities which collect the tax Entities Involved in Activities funded by the tax Lee Cameron (term ends 12/31/2016) Peggy Doering, Valleyfest (term ends 12/31/2016) OPTIONS: Confirmation of Mayoral Recommended Appointments. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: "1 move to confirm the Mayoral appointments to the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee as follows: Representing an entity which collects the tax: Colleen Heinselman, for a term beginning immediately upon appointment and expiring December 31, 2017; and Representing an individual involved in activities funded by the tax: Chuck Stocker, for a term beginning immediately upon appointment and expiring December 31, 2017." BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: n/a STAFF/COUNCIL CONTACT: Mayor Higgins ATTACHMENTS. n/a CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 2-23-16 Department Director Approval Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Approval of City Hall Plan GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Multiple meetings, Council retreat 02-17-15; Administrative Report 03-17-15, Motion Consideration 03-24-15, Study Session 09-15-15, Motion Consideration 09-29-15, Interior Discussion 11-18-15, Heating and Cooling Discussions on 12-1-15 and 12-15-15, Interior and Exterior Discussion 12-29-15, General updates on 01-19- 16 and 02-02-16, Final design discussion on 02-16-16. BACKGROUND: Developing options for a permanent City Hall building has been a Council budget and economic development goal for the past several years. Earlier this year, the City closed on 3.38 acres of property at the former University City Mall site. At the February 17, 2015 Council workshop, staff discussed the selection process for architectural firms to design the building. At the March 17, 2015 Council meeting staff updated the Council on the selected design firm and discussed the draft professional services agreement for the project. At the March 24, 2015 meeting, the Council authorized the City Manager to contract with Architects West to design the site and building. The architect team conducted a public meeting on May 6, 2015 and met with councilmembers and staff to finalize the program and discuss design parameters for the building. The project team updated the Council on the design process and displayed two potential concepts on September 15, 2015. Council indicated a preference for one of the concepts which was approved on September 29, 2015. Interior color and material options were discussed on November 18, 2015 and a general heating and cooling discussion was held on December 1, 2015. A general discussion on interior and exterior details occurred on December 29, 2015 and a status update was given on January 19, 2016 and February 2, 2016. On February 16, 2016, staff and the project architect provided a detailed review of the construction plan set and the specification documents. Final floorplans, exterior and interior details, materials, and site layout were discussed. OPTIONS: Approve the final City Hall plans or provide alternative direction. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the final City Hall plans as presented and authorize the City Manager to proceed with the bid process. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The City Hall construction project is anticipated to cost $14.4 million including land acquisition, design services, and construction. STAFF CONTACT: John Hohman, Community and Economic Development Director ATTACHMENTS: n/a 1 of 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: February 23, 2016 Department Director Approval: ❑ Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ['admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Motion to Rescind Previous Motion Concerning Historic Preservation GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Motion passed December 29, 2015 to forward Historic Preservation consideration to the Planning Commission. BACKGROUND: December 3, 2013: Council heard an administrative report on historic preservation and special evaluations, including some of the aspects of and processes for establishing an historic preservation program, and what it would take for us to become a Certified Local Government (CLG). Staff was asked to gather more information, and Mr. Basinger noted he will research what historic assets we have, if there are grants available, the idea of partnering with private companies, and the criteria for having a property or district placed on a register. Council also agreed to have the State Preservation Officer come to a future meeting to give more information. August 19, 2014: Staff explained the steps necessary to become a CLG as a means to maintain historic preservation to aid in tourism and economic development, and the formation of a commission. Council indicated its preference that staff pursue this further, and invite the State Historic Preservation Officer to speak to Council in greater detail concerning a CLG. October 14, 2014: City of Spokane Historic Preservation Officer Greg Griffith, formerly of the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, gave an overview of the program, including how to apply to become a CLG, and the responsibilities associated with such certification. There was Council consensus to move forward with the program of a CLG. February 3, 2015: Staff gave Council three options: (1) City staff runs the entire program; (2) a consultant would provide technical support through a services contract, or (3) have the City of Spokane provide technical support through an interlocal agreement. Questions were asked regarding use of previous building codes, and content of any ordinance, with the conclusion that staff would do further research. February 17, 2015: Follow-up from February 3 meeting; staff gave overview of different codes and how they relate to historic preservation; discussion of building code regulations and safety issues; further research needed on criteria for commission; and staff to come back with draft inventory of historic property for Spokane Valley. April 21, 2015: staff explained the need for an inventory of properties; said the Heritage Museum has a registry containing approximately 120 properties, half of which might meet the criteria for historic property designation. Talked about what could be included in an ordinance, including nomination process; talk of tax implications and any flexibility, with Council consensus to have staff do more research on those issues. June 30, 2015: Staff assured Council the City has authority to write the ordinance and have the program the way the Council wants it, that being listed on any historic register would be voluntary, and that the property owner must approve their property being on the register. Tax incentives were discussed, and mention again that building codes are meant to provide safety requirements, and we would have limited ability to adopt buildings codes that do not meet that standard. Staff explained the benefits, drawbacks, and estimated cost and Council concurred to move this forward. September 15, 2015: Staff again went over the basics; historic inventory would simply be a listing without any attached regulations, while an historic register would have applicable regulations based on property tax and historic contribution. Council expressed concern this would become more over time and that even a commission with good intentions would end up being restrictive to property rights. To determine consensus, a show of hands resulted in Mayor Grafos and Councilmembers Wick, Gothmann and Hafner in favor of moving this forward; and Deputy Mayor Woodard and Councilmembers Higgins and Pace opposed to moving this forward. The item moved forward. December 15, 2015: Staff clarified the process to move this forward and have an historic preservation plan adopted. Council reviewed draft ordinances and staff explained that staff and commission training, adoption of an historic preservation program ordinance and historic preservation commission ordinance, implementation of rules and procedure for the commission, amending the fee schedule, appointing commission members, applying to become a CLG would all be needed to implement the program. Again emphasis that participation in the program would be strictly voluntary. Deputy Mayor Woodard asked for a list of properties and structures that would qualify and an estimate of the valuation of those. December 29, 2015: Motion consideration: Moved and seconded to forward this item to the Planning Commission for further consideration. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Mayor Grafos and Councilmembers Hafner, Gothmann, and Wick. Opposed: Deputy Mayor Woodard and Councilmembers Pace and Higgins. Motion carried. OPTIONS: Optional motion as Councilmembers deem appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: "I move that the motion carried at the December 29, 2015 Council meeting to forward the Historic Preservation Program item to the Planning Commission for further consideration, be rescinded." BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: n/a STAFF/COUNCIL CONTACT: Deputy Mayor Woodard ATTACHMENTS: n/a CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: February 23, 2016 Department Director Approval: Item: Check all that apply: ['consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ['public hearing ['information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Comprehensive Plan Existing Conditions Report Overview GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Growth Management Act (GMA) RCW 36.70A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: Per RCW 36.70A.130(1), every county and city in the state is required to conduct an update of its comprehensive plan and development regulations every 8 years. The City of Spokane Valley's update is due no later than June 30, 2017. In October 2015 staff updated the Council on the Comprehensive Plan update project. The review highlighted the public participation components, including public meetings, Community Vision Report, and CAR review, as well as several reports prepared by the consultant. Reports included an audit of the Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies, and Existing Conditions Reports for the City's housing, land use, and transportation conditions. Staff and consultants are moving forward with the development of the Draft Comprehensive Plan and anticipate coming before Council with various issues for discussion. The Existing Conditions reports will be discussed once again to provide context for future meetings. Staff will provide an overview of the population forecast process, and the Existing Conditions Reports. OPTIONS: N/A RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: N/A BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None STAFF CONTACT: John Hohman, Director and Lori Barlow, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint Presentation Community Vision Report Existing Conditions Housing and Economic Trends Transportation System Existing Conditions Report City Council Meeting Comprehensive Plan Update Existing Conditions Report Summary February 23, 2016 Overview 1. Comp Plan Update 2. Population Forecast 3. Existing Conditions Reports Next Steps Community Vision Report \v1,4 1 Nift)Ut_ gs_doN OA kyt Nit \ici COkittillahlt 11 \ \I tSt IL '‘ ot \ Population Allocation Authority to Plan RCW 36.70A.130: The "comprehensive land use plan and development regulations shall be subject to continuing review and evaluation by the county or city that adopted them": Annual update process allowed —but only once per year (with some exceptions) Periodic update required by June 2017 IVFelandman Ness Population Forecast a PTAC Recommendation: Analysis - Compared OFM • 6 meetings between March 19 and October 1 • 3 forecasts considered with variable numbers for SV a SCE) Recommendation: • OFM 2037 medium forecast • Meeting November 4, 2015 • Spokane Valley 20 year forecast = 14,650 additional population forecasts to actual growth 510,000 500,000 440,000 480,000 470,000 460,000 450,000 440,000 430,000 420,000 410,000 400,000 ■ Actual 1.02 1.02 ■ 2002 OFM Actual 1-00 ■2007 OFM ■2012 OFM Actual 0.99 0.99 1.01 Actual 2005 2010 Projection Year 2015 Existing Conditions Reports submardbp EHR'k'PEERS Fehr& Pers 100! 4th Avenue Swire 4120 Seams, WA 98154 DRAFT REPORT Transportation System Existing Conditions August 2015 Existing Conditions Housing And Economic Trends Population /Demographic Trends Steady population growth — 1% annually City has higher % of persons over age 65 than County and older median age (39.8 vs. 37.2) Less City residents have higher education levels than County (21 % vs 28%) Lower median household income than County ($48,000 vs. $49,200) Conclus Housing Trends Modest housing growth - 1% annually Characteristics changing • More Multi -family built than single family, • # of renters is increasing • Avg. household size is decreasing, • % of households with children is decreasing 35% of all households pay more than 30% of income for housing ion: City's older population is influencing the trends Existing Conditions Housing And Economic Trends Economic Trends Existing Land Uses Service -based economy providing commercial, professional, and retail services City economy has been slow to recover Regional Commercial and Corridor Mixed Use zones realized the largest decrease in sales during the recession Half of the land base used for single family housing is typical of a suburban community. Single Family General Commercial Vacant Land Industrial Multi -family Exempt/Utility Development Trends - The Significant Changes Since Recession Residential Development Trends Increase in Multi -family Housing construction to meet demand - Vacancy Rate Low • Most MF construction located in MUC and CMU zones; • Only 1 project in MF -1 zone • No MF projects on Sprague Generally indicates the demand for housing types is changing Commercial Development Trends Retail Sales recently recovered to pre -recession levels Demand for Commercial properties is weak • Office space vacancy rate is over 20% • Retail vacancy rate is improving —from 10% in 2012 to 6% presently Indicates an oversupply of office space Buildable Residential Land Buildable Acres By Zone Residential Land Capacity Net Share of Buildable Unit Population Papulation Zone Acres Capacity Capacity Capacity R-3 653 3187 9,468 47.4% R-4 151 1.101 2.751 13_8% MF -2 51 1,129 2,257 11.3 MF -1 87 X58 1,g17 9.6% Mia 165 1.017 1,525 7.6 R- 1!-.'.:_i 402 1,005 5.0% 01.11.1 74 651 X76 4.9 R-1 1' 32 79 0.4 Total I 1. 7 9.076 19,980 100.0% 1% Almost 70% of buildable residential land is zoned single family; 1 10/0 Multi family and 19% Mixed Use. This does not consider land size or distribution for ease of aggregation. R-3 R-4 MF -2 MF -1 MUC R-2 CMU R-1 Demographics of 20 year Population Forecast New Population: 14,650 • Avg. Household Size: 2.43 persons • Age of Population: — Over 65: 14%; Under 19: 26% Projected New Households: 6029 • Households with Children — 30.7% with children and 69.3% without children • Renters vs Home Owners: 2291 Rent / 3738 Own • Cost Burdened Households: — 36% households overall (2170 of the 6029 new households) — 50% of renter households 11 Buildable Commercial and Industrial 1 .and 0/0 Acres % 4% \ Irw" Net Net Underutilized Net Bwiklable Zone Vacant Acres Acres Share 1-2 379 208 587 46.9 % 1-1 201 65 266 21.3% Mt1C 105 4 109 8.7 RC 44 52 96 7.7 CMIIJ 37 47 84 6.7 C 28 29 57 4.5 0 25 7 32 2.5'4 GO 9 5 14 1.2 NC 3 2 5 0.4'4 Total 831 419 I1.250 100.0% Spokane Valley currently lacks small scale, neighborhood oriented commercial areas within walking distance to many of the residential areas. 1-2 I-1 MUC RC CMU C 0 GO NC Development Trends - The Significant Changes Since Recession Industrial Development Trends Limited new industrial development Vacancies have decreased from 20% to less than 10% Indicates at some point new space may need to be developed Focused Analysis of Zoning Issues Medium Density Residential Zoning What's the Problem? The MF -1 zone has not had Multifamily development since 2012 • 1 permit in zone since 2012 for MF; almost 300 units built per year in other zones City has heard MF projects are not feasible in this zone Conclusions Pro -forma Analysis Conclusions • Density limit is too low to make development feasible at current rent levels and development costs Policy Considerations • MF tax exemptions for medium density housing types • Allow other housing types that are less expensive to construct • Adjust setbacks, lot width, development standards, etc. MF -1 and MF -2 Zones --z-11-?:-.1:="11111111111IIPI wricr elk I. • Legend Vacant Parcels MF -1 MF -2 i—imp_*1 i momion 15 Focused Analysis of Zoning Issues Mixed Use Zoning —Can It Work in the CMU zones? What's the Problem? Conclusions The Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) zone has not realized adequate levels of new development along Sprague and Trent. Mixed Use is typically a vertical development with MF units on upper story and retail on the ground floor. Pro -forma Analysis Conclusions • Lack of redevelopment is due to project economies - anticipated rents do not support vertical development • not an issue with zone regulations • Trent more affected than Sprague due to lower land values, proximity to industrial uses and railroad tracks, and distance from 1-90 - Not as competitive relative to other locations. Policy Considerations • MF tax exemptions • Consider adjustments to setbacks, open space standards, parking standards Sprague and Trent Zoning Zoning Code C 0 - RC CMU 1-1 MUC1-2 NC iImI.jam "' �� �s s�. 1111:1111111-= '�"1■I 11n�i� -�� ii til"l,irii=6: �� == grnill IIPP" 1 M Ka 011.111, ea IMAM. i, Aim —W-!.......aiigemir1611061191M111 f a w■ t 4ll■MEM 41M sim 1111M:1111 mom Eirm•mplm• .....� e■ =-.- Focused Analysis of Zoning Issues Office Zone —Why isn't Office and Garden Office Developing? • What's the Problem? • Recent office development is happening outside of the City's two office zones around 1-90 and in the MUC Zone — Areas with good visibility and large vacant tracts • Existing Conditions? • Office zones have seen little office development since 2004 — Zones concentrated along Argonne, Pines and Evergreen Corridors — Zones have a mixture of uses (retail and single family) — Parcel sizes less than .75 acres (hard to assemble for sizable new development) Focused Analysis of zoning Issues Office Zoning —Why isn't Office and Garden Office Developing? Analysis Typical small office building since 2004 had at least 20,000 sq. ft. and parking; This translates to minimum development site around 35,000 sq. ft. or more for new office project. The 0 and GO zones only have a few adequate sized sites (vacant or redevelopable) Policy Considerations • MUC and other areas close to 1-90 better suited to Office development • Medical office uses may see a demand linked to aging population • Vacant areas in 0 and GO are along major corridors with good transit and suitable for MF • Consider more opportunity for residential uses • Consider Rezones accordingly C Recent Office . Development — I' v o o.d ®- - 1\1 111 Spokane it Valley " r Office Development Rentable Building Area < 10,000 10,000 - 25,000 25,000 - 50,000 50,000 - 100,000 > 100.000 Built before 2004 • Built between 2004 and 2014 Office Zones Legend OO O Vacant Parcels 1 - Interstate Highways 2 - State Highways Arterials �--�� Railroad Land Uses in Office Zones Single Family Irrsitutiori Multi Family Other Res Hotel Marbuf Ut 11 itis s Commercial Pub Assy Church Res Lard Source: County Assessor Office Land Use Codes Focused Analysis of Zoning Issue. Neighborhood Commercial Zoning retail uses in neighborhoods? Can we develop small scale What's the Problem? Conclusions City lacks small-scale neighborhood -oriented commercial areas within walking distance of residential neighborhoods Small/Local business support a vibrant retail market and creates community character Pro -forma Analysis Conclusions • Limited vacant sites at major intersections to support small scale retail development • Residential areas surrounding sites are low density — not enough population to support retail • Pro -forma analysis indicated vertical mixed-use not feasible Policy Considerations • Rezone vacant parcels NC • Rezone intersections as NC for redevelopment • Review parking requirements for NC uses • Consider Rezones Accordingly Residential Zoned Land m_ ■� wimp gill '111db- -= -dial eirimagilibilMIIPft-air--- !Nip i IPA Illg,A_M EL dim idEtni=m, 1MM- int ilill MI 71=11 EMI __0•11111 • 'illi::: ���W_ 7ng, kr L ..i �� r IW r _i__ 1 i �. 7 r ilk Nii Legend 1 Inte rsect io ns 1 - Interstate Highways 2 - State Highways Arteria Is Railroad Zoning Code 7 R-1 Mail R-4 R-2 a MF -1 R-3 - MF -2 Submr.ic FEHR t' PEERS Fehr &Peers 1001 4th Avenue Suite 4170 Seattle, WA 98154 Transportation System Existing Conditions August 2015 Switching Gears 'xisting Conditions - Transportation System Land Uses and Key Destinations Live, work, and play areas are impacted by how a city guides where development occurs. Land Use Element provides the framework for future land use growth in Spokane Valley. Understanding how people travel to work is important to accommodate future modes of transportation . Work commute choices largely depend on where they live, where their job is located, and the transportation options available. Population Density • Population densities - higher south of 1-90 between Argonne and Sullivan Road. • Separation of jobs, housing, and retail results in some traffic congestion around the 1-90 interchanges • Viability of people walking and biking to work or shopping is limited - people are generally uncomfortable walking or biking along busy streets. Population Density (Persons per Square Mile) 1,004 Z000 3,004 4,000 MI 5.004 q JE 1 1. Millwh od se RIM by ' ... reauQrth of I-90 and east of Sulliva Road also hal as vyith dense Opining. Censu is in `these areas are larfer and include parcels of undeveloped land, leading to lower population density area -wide. Existing Conditions - Commute Characteristics Daily Commute Flow 38,800 people commute into Spokane Valley for work. 22,800 city residents commute out of the Valley for work; 13,800 residents stay in the Valley for work Commute Mode to Work Walk 1.1% Transit 3.1% Carpool 10.7% - Bike Source 2011 US Census Bureau's Longitudinal Employer -Household Dynamics (LEND) survey Other Items Considered Pedestrian Facilities Bicycle Facilities Public Transit Facilities Goods Movement and Freight Corridors Motor Vehicles - Traffic Counts & LOS r fcn9 Millwood i M or 1 E y + _' 4r •• • Levu of Service A - C a E F { i11Sx1G'I'. IE.J'. ISpokane I4 Walley --1 E xI 1 1 u(ai6 1 Existing Conditions Challenges Opportunities Many residential streets do not have curb, gutter, or sidewalks — could benefit from enhancements Long blocks and high traffic speeds make it difficult to cross major streets — impedes transit use, walking/biking, etc. Transit service is minimal in parts of the Valley, requiring that people drive to reach destination The regions position on major freight rail corridor increase risk of train delays caused by at -grade - crossings Unattractive streetscape, lack of gateway features, and public spaces on side of streets Streets in good repair — allow opportunities to invest in other city priorities Good Traffic Level of Service Grid system can support a considerable amount of additional economic development Good connections to freeway and railway network support economic development opportunities Strong pedestrian/bicycle plan that is expanding the trail network with regional and federal funding. Next Council Discussion Focus Areas: Goals and Policies Water Resource Inventory Tiny Houses Spokane jValleyu COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE COMMUNITYVISION REPORT APRIL2015 This Page Intentionally Blank \ titr \10111 Siort I Olt Pkl k, LU +1�u.r'r)1, i M L1T99�� Meetrngattendee par trcrpdtri} rrl the "Vision V, 'i"exercise The Community Vision Report has been prepared for the City of Spokane Valley by Van Ness Feldman, LLP in collaboration with ECCNorthwest and Fehr & Peers. Van Ness Feldrnan LLP ECONorthwest ECCNOMICS • FINANCE • PLANNING To learn more about the Comprehensive Plan update process and sign up for e-mail alerts, scan the QR Code: FEHR c° PEERS Or you can visit; www.spolkanevalley.org/CP This Page Intentionally Blank TABLE OF CONTENTS iNTRODUCTION 1-1 ProjectOverview: 1-1 Public Participation Objectives: 1-2 PUBLIC ViSlaNiNG fifiEETINGS 2-1 Public Visioning Meetings - January 28th and 29th 2-1 Community Character Themes 2-4 Economic Opportunity Themes 2-6 Housing Themes 2-8 Transportation Themes 2-10 Vi5i011 Wall Themes 2-12 REPORT -BACK MEETING 3-1 Report -Bark Meeting - March 4 3-1 Community Character 3-3 Economic Opportunity 3-4 Housing 3-5 Transportation 3-6 Conclusion 3-7 Next Steps 3-7 Meeting Materials -January 28 & 29, 2013 Public Visioniriq Niseting5 A 73 March 4, 2015 Report -Back Meeting B-1 Comment iVlatrix C-1 This Page Intentionally Blank !car E. ValItyy wprcii naive I'I„n Lpclaie CorriniLTav Repo: The City of Spokane Valley began the process of updating its Comprehensive Pian in November, 2014_ This periodic update will be conducted in accordance with the GMA, governed by RCW 36.70A. Public engagement throughout the planning process i:5 a: 1"t dall1Cilta I g I of the Washington State Growth Management Act {GMAli. The c,, '::.4 : Lriv to 'r_ncouraoe the involvement of citizens in the planning process and cn:lir.:' c oor;lifl 1LIC}rti iy2t've„At7[?•-t communities and jurisdictions to reconcile conflicts.'” Its. chivt+_tlx.: cJ:b1 I oftitiztn participation, the GMA encourages early and continuow. public peiticipation by statiilg that jurisdictions shall "...establish and broadly disseminate to the public r3 public participation program identifying procedures providing for early and cc_r7tinuOUS public participation in the development and amendment of comprehensive land use plants and development regulations implementing such plans?" The City of Spokane Valley adopted a Public Participation Program (PPP} for the periodic Comprehensive Plan update on January 6, 2015 (the PPP Is available on the project webpage at http://www.spokanevalley.org/CP). The City recognizes the importance of public engagement to the Comprehensive Plan update process and has made a concerted effort to engage the broadest segment of the City's and Region's population to participate in the Comprehensive Plan update. The CommtinityrVision Report provides a summary of the i'ubli[ engagement efforts and input received to this point in the process. It reviews the outreach activities conducted during the public visioning meetings and summarizes themes from public comments received at. the workshops and through other means. The report dine contains a working draft of the public eon -inlet -it matrix, including responses and policy 5..1rJ_ic5tions, which will ultimately be considered by the Planning Commission prior to making a recommendation to the City Council. The appendices include the materials presented to the public and tabulated results. The City cel- 5p t..d. ne Valley is updating its Comprehensive Plan in accordance with the GMA, gcverned 1;, VW 36.70A. The Comprehensive Plan is the City's official staternent concerning its vision for future growth and devebaprnent.The Plan comprises several individual elements, some of which are required and others optional. The City of Spokane Valley amends its Comprehensive Plan on an annual basis as permitted by State law. In addition to these regular amendments, the GMA requires counties and cities to periodically conduct a thorough review oftheir plans and regulations to bring them in line with any relevant changes in the GMA and to accommodate updated growth targets. Spokane 1 "RCW 36-70A.030 Planning Caaa':s' 2 "RCiiV 36.70A.'.4c' Cornprehnnsiue Plans—Ensure Public Participation" 11 .000 Malley Community oaOppor [unify Sp:]k i e valley Cornprene }si}. Pian U:date Co7mi.anity V;sicn R2porl Valley's Comprehensive Plan was first adopted in 2006. SpokaneValley's next periodic update is required to be adopted by June 30, 2017. The City's Comprehensive Plan update process began in November 2014. Public Participation Objectives: The specific public participation objectives for the Comprehensive Plan update are to: 1. Enhance the quality of and support for the Comprehensive Plan through meaningful public and agency participation in the preparation of the Plan update 2. Balance the interests of our community with the interests of the State and region 3. Identify issues early and evaluate options for resolution during the planning process 4. Comply with all state laws and regulations related to public participation Ptibifc visioning meeting Public visioning meeting Public visioning meeting $k ne divoi*Vall COMM Unity cfIJpp 'itJ iCy 1-2 Public visioning meeting Spc knne VIII -y Comprehensive ?Ian U;1dai; COM FA! niCy td I! cil R.ep.ar; PUBLIC VISIONING IV! ":i'.71-41--.:713 As part of the first phase of the Comprehensive Plan update, the City of Spokane Valley conducted two Community Visioning Meetings seeking input from the public on the various topics relating to the Community Vision Statement and the future nfthe City. A main goal of the meetings was to gather input related to the City's vision statement. This input facilitated a thorough reviewofthe vision, ensuring that it is still applicable and appropriate. Additionally, the meetings provided the opportunity to introduce the public to the overall Comprehensive Plan update. This section provides a summary of the meetings and presents comments and input obtained from those attending the meetings, Public tlisior,inci e circ s -January 28th and 29th Two identical public visioning meetings were held in late January; one in the evening of January 28th and the other in the morning of January 29th. Both meetings were held at CenterPlace Regional Event Center in Spokane Valley Approximately 125 members of the public attended the meetings. The City presented topic areas derived from the Community Vision Statement and posed questions to the public to stimulate thoughtful discussion and input. The input received at these meetings has been used to identify themes in responses that are applicable to the Comprehensive Plan update, The themes will be used throughout the update process and provide direction to the City as to how goals and policies should be amended, if necessary, Public uisicrnirag meeting Public visionrng meeting Public visioning meeting 2-1 Public visioning mehermg Sia,. . Camr1irrii! cfOpportundy Sp. I'. c1'y'\f: JIey COri jf 'l'..I',SIVs PIi;ii IJpclatc ..QIr171,.nitVVi5ion Report ,dvertisinca and C�lotlfcatjon The City utilized a variety of outlets to notify community members and stakeholders about the public visioning meetings! including: • Postcard mailing to all households in Spokane Valley city limits • Postings on the City's website • Legal notice in the newspaper • Newspaper display advertisement Posters displayed around Spokane Valley • E-mail notification • Social media (via Spokane Regional Transportation Council [SRTC]) SpokaneValley Comprehensive Plan GET INVOLVED! Come learn about the City's efforts to complete the first major update of the SpDkaneValley Comprehensive Plan Plif}tl G'�+s inn+ng. Meetings January 28 January 28, R015 5'00 to 8:00 FM and January 29, 201 7 30 to 9.30 AM CenteaPlace Regional E=vent Cenrcr 24213 N. Discovery Place Spokane Valley, WA 99215 *waneSign up for e.mail Tru rod get • prolacs upd^gas ac hecruwww.spoionmlie.v.argiCP DID YOU KNO ... Spokane Vadiey became a city on March 3 f, 2003 and is the 10th largest city in the State ofWashirgtant 7.116 Topics include Housing Community Character Transportation Fronomk Devefprnerat Graphic of postcordncticesent to aU househoi'ds in 5paltone Valley Meeting Sunii'11Irj As meeting attendees signed -in at the welcome table, they were asked to participate in a quick exercise. The exercise asked meeting attendees to place a sticky dot in the location of their home and another one in the location of their work place. The results showed that there was representation from widespread areas within Spokane Valley as well as the Spokane region. The City was able to better understand the constituency through this exercise, which helps inform the process of updating the Comprehensive Plan. 111 iY nn� IIS Valley Community ofQppc tutftty 2-2 5pckan '`alley COTprelic:isivt Plan 'JpdE' e Ccriirnil:litw Vision R post "Where do you live and WorkrMap results from both meetings A presentation was shown at the beginning of each meeting to introduce the overall project as well as the planning context (i.e. Washington State GMA) within which the City of Spokane Valley is working. The presentation also explained the intended project phases and gave background information ori the existing Comprehensive Plan. A substantive review of the Spokane Valley Vision Statement was a major element of the publicvisoning meetings. Before the City can move forward in its planning for the Comprehensive Plan update, it is necessary to ensure that the existing vision statement is still a valid representation of the desired future of the community. Spokane Valley has an adopted vision statement, which is: "A community of opportunity where individuals and families can grow and play and businesses will flourish and prosper.'" Analysis of the elements of the vision statement led to the development of four topical areas that are essential to the vision. The four elements include: 1. Community Character 2. Economic Opportunity 3. Housing 4. Transportation Each topic represents ars essential component to the success of Spokane Valley and its progress toward achieving the vision. Exercises were designed around each topic area to gather specific input from the community on how %yell the City has implemented the vision thus far and areas in wh`.ch there is roam for improvement. The exercises allowed members of the public to critically think about issues, opportunities, challenges, and highlights to discuss with other members of the public and/or staff members 1 "Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, 2(45" 2-3 Stibiratte SS ]]. 1e Communrtyof Opportunr Spokane Val iey Cerlir•,hens;v.e f'l,-n Update Corns ryVision Repo. r: who were facilitating the exercises. Specifically, the community participated in both mapping exercises and 'dot voting" exercises at each station. In general, the"dot voting"exercises asked attendees to think about the current state of the City and then haw they would like to see the City grow and improves over the next 20 years, while the map exercises asked attendees to identify areas in SpokaneValley that have challenges or opportunities. Attendees were also asked to submit comment cards at each station, which provided a means for the public to submit open-ended responses, Themes There was significant response to the presentation and exercises, spanning a wide range of comments and input. The input received at these meetings has been used to identify major themes in responses to help inform the planning process for the Comprehensive Plan update. The themes were developed in consideration of the following criteria: • Quantity and similarity of comments • Topic and .Map exercises -- concentration of received dots • Discussions with meeting attendees • Applicability of input to the Comprehensive Plan The following major themes were identified in the responses received from the public at the visioning meeting, including both written and verbal comments received at the exercise stations. Community Character Themes • Focus on the area near the proposed Positive association with the new city hall CentennialTrail • Increased sense of community identity • Increased focus on parks "abulateci Results The following table represents the raw data collected at the Community Character exercise station: Spokane Walley has great places to meet with friends. Spokane Valley community has a clear identity I have the abiity to access and participate 'n community activities 'Yes 17 f+l o 12 Yes 8 No 30 Yes 25 No Community of Oppnrtunitya 2-4 Spoka 32'ialley Coil relsens 're' jiIl Update Cornmuni=y Visicn Public rnptir from the iPorrrmuni'tyChar-caw Station, including pJ5terwdMar Pxercises Fie; Findings Meeting attendees had a strong sense of pride in their community, but they aro identified areas in which the City of Spokane Valley could improve. Specifically, the public noted that they embraced the portion of the Centennial Trail that runs through the City. Comments as well as the concentration of dots on the mapping exercises indicated that the Centennia l Trail is a major amenity in the community and one that the City should continue to embrace in the update of the Comprehensive Plan. The public also identified the area at the intersection of University Road and Sprague Avenue as a location that has opportunity and could benefit from specific focus from the City during the Comprehensive Pian update. This area had a high concentration of dots on the mapping exercise and was also the subject of comments received. Additional Community Character themes that were identified by the public included a desire to have an increased sense of community identity throughout the City and that the City should have an increased focus on parks. The theme of community identity related to a variety of topics, including creating a more beautiful city and emphasizing a stronger neighborhood feel throughout the community. The theme of emphasizing parks related to a general sense that the City could benefit from additional parks, even if on a small scale, such as the concept of pocket parks. 2-5 Sikikane .'0Malleyy C rnrrrunrtynJCpportr.nUy 5pokanh,Aralaey Cunpf i. sivw PI. n LJpc]aw Conirn nf,,.Vi n k- part Economic Opportunity Themes • Desire to create special places in the community • Maintain fiscal responsibility • Leverage community assets • Focus on the importance of existing local cimmerciai and industrial areas • Opportunities exist around public facilities • Concern over external forces and Code Enforcement Publ€t: input from the f"cr+fiornic Opporrunity Statim r71L7 exerc i, ti - 44 Ur, II N6n cn..d ier..��%sirmy..•vd�""� . �•�P `Mui• ' ln`F„-n'ln.,y .., me, Public input from the Economic Opportunity Stotler? "thought cloud" exercise KEN Findings Meeting attendees noted that the City could make progress toward creating areas that reinforce the existing community character while seeking ways to create new residential and commercial opportunities to benefit residents, The public also recognized the importance that existing commerce plays in funding public services and the ability to invest in community assets, Additionally, comments from the public indicated a need to better understand opportunities to leverage Spokane Valley community assets to attract investment. Concerns over external forces were exemplified by questions from the public about how a future US 395 extension and more rail traffic might impact the city (both positively and Spo nen ' 2-6 Community of Qpport um)/ Spokark'aICey C'crxi�rellen5ive Plan Update Corn rr5...i iiy ViSior, Ri2porL negatively}. Meeting attendees also expressed concern over how certain uses might be regulated and enforced. It was also noted that the public feels existing commercial areas are important to the local economy because they provide close proximity to residential areas or unique offerings or experiences. Another theme that emerged from the public visioning meetings was that existing public facilities such as parks, schools, libraries, churches, social services, and community cEnt-r4 are important foundational community assets that anchor the local economy. Simil�a� ly, community development opportunities exist around public facilities like trails, natural amenities like the Spokane River, and under-used/vacant lands like the University Ceoitc he public would like to see the City take .advantage of these opportunities to create great spaces that enhance the community's identity while supporting economic development. For further economic opportunity information, reference Appendix A, which includes information on economic trends in Spokane Valley and the region. The information includes data on job and industry growth, household income, and spending, among others. a Meeting atrerrdeesAortic rpoting in the Ecorronnic Opprftun/ty exercise 2-7 Staane Community of Opp ort uru ry Sonikane Valley ci:,rprehers se Plar Update tar' 11unit'p Vision Repo •I Housing Themes • Housing affordability • Housing for seniors • More and tetter amenities • Preservation of neighborhood character Tabulited Results The following table represents the raw data collected at the Housing exercise station: What type of housing du you live in? Single Family Properties i.5 Acres in 5ie Single Family Properties st].5 Acres in Size Apartments 24 19 3 Duplex Manufactured Home Park 4 1 Other (Accessary CTweaiing Unit,Seriinr blousing, Special Needsi Where wilt you or your extended family Want to live to 10 years? Single Family Properties a0.5 Acres in Size Single Family Properties 50:5 Acres in Size Apartments 21 15 3 Duplex Manufactured Home Park 3 1 Other f Accessory Dwelling Unit, Senior HOU sing, 5peclal Needs) 91. Public Ova from the Housing 5 ration poster exereiSe Co mm Litt fry ofopportunity 2-8 .a a4w5.y. 4Y+1H,..•n.n� I,,a,M ,.rrvi F.. 2 - 5r+Por t+ous=ng 2- {}tiler d i Iti▪ T—i ►pIYy1W, .• Mr'. Y.•wn Spokane Va1ey Comprehensive IJI:cis le L n'.mjni;y Vi=ion Rc:j,767rf Key Findincj The public provided input on the City's existing housing stack as well as the type of housing they would like to see developed in the City over the next 20 years. The key findings that emerged from the Housing exercises were focused primarily on improving housing options and preserving neighborhoods. One theme related to the sentiment that housing needs to be more affordable. A desire for a greater variety of housing types as well as quality hurries at affordable prices was expressed as a way to increase homeownership in the community. Another issue that the public identified is a need to further consider housing options for the senior population. Meeting attendees noted that with an aging population there is an increased need to focus on housing for seniors in the community. Other concerns of the comrnunity included the need to preserve the character of neighborhoods, but also allow for more and better amenities in proximity to neighborhoods. Meeting attendees commented that housing needs to be near retail, health care services, parks, and also provide for the ability to use public transportation. Refer to Appendix A for more detailed information about how the Spokane Valley population has grown and is projected to grow in the future. included in the analysis is also a look at housing reimposition, home ownership rates, and housing costs in the community. Meeting attendees pi rtP opotingln the Hcusony exercise 2-9 SOliane .00%1 ley CarnmuniryPr Ortuniiy op.)lcai VaIIoy Ca-,`,0rehensiv. FIS„i IJI,rl t� Lo 7;711.ii itiVisiof} Report Transportation Themes • Level of Service policy works well • Improve connections for other- modes of travel • Focus ori maintenance and technology • Improve freight movement and safety "• invest in streetscape and Cornmunity Character Taoulacecl ReSLIi The following table represents the raw data collected attheTransportatian exercise station: Issues and Opportunities TfaffirCrrngrsTion Gain.;WCII 8 Ram For Improverrorn 1 Roadway Maintenance (Pavement Condition, Sweeping, Snow Removal) C.aingLCret 12 Hoorn far tml:1054 rnr 17 5idewalks,TraiIs, Bikeways 2 25 Residential Street Design (Curbs vs.Swales,2 Shoulders vs, Sidewalks) Projects to Improve Crossings of Major Streets 11 Freight Movementcan 4 19 Convenient Connections (1 easily get where I want to go using the mode of my'choice) Neighborh,Jevi Tr., I it Calming Pro gr.,,1 9 Other (Write your priority here7 Safety on Neighborhood Streets (Speed ❑f Traffic, Lighting( 3 15 Bus Service 6 13 Safety on Arterial Streets {Speed afTraffic, Crosswa ks} 6 18 Other [Write your priority hero 1 _sr.:mi ni/awn fie Ira rfic lig MI 10 •mkaa7mixing _ungestlun Prioritization Projects to Reduce Ira Mc Congestion (new lanes, new 5trtset5] 1 1 Initiatives to Preserve andMaintain Transportation System (Street Paving. Fre Srdewa Iksr 22 Technologies to Improve T-afftc Flow {rraffai 5.-ig mil Sync?,rortizatibn, IntPIAgt+rtwit TransecrtatIonSy€teams) 25 Upgrading Unimproved Streets to Current design Standards 12 Providing for Safe and Efficient Freight Mcbiity 15 Projects to Improve Crossings of Major Streets 20 Providing a Comprehensive Bike way & Pedestrian System 19 Improvements tv Bus Routing and Schedules 10 Neighborh,Jevi Tr., I it Calming Pro gr.,,1 9 Other (Write your priority here7 • at is and culture 10 more street trees - improvingvisibilityr Community ofOpperritr;, r•, 2-10 ran cporenrlon !swim & Opp* pok ne;Eornprei-icnsieeUpdate Comm Lin l Vision Report Pu bric input frog, the 'rra rrsptr to,ion Station poster exercises Wn'A• 511,1,110 W I�r-�sriciaA 11 Public Input from the tarnsportstion Station paster exercises Kev Fin:i�ncr5 The results of the public visioning meetings indicated that transportation is a high-priority topic for the public_ Specifically, there were five major themes in the responses received, with topics ranging from maintenance and technology to streetscape. Meeting attendees noted that other than the freeway, there is not much traffic congestion in the City. Limited traffic congestion, when combined with the relatively close proximity of services to neighborhoods, led to the theme that the City's Level of Service (LOS) policy works well. The LOS policy dictates that City streets should perform at a certain level during peak travel times, known as LOS D. This ensures that roads may see sorne congestion at peak travel times, but with little congestion the rest of the day. Similarly, the public also noted that there are potential benefits to using technology, specifically related to traffic signal synchronization to reduce traffic congestion. The topic of freight mobility and safety was an important issue far the community and commenters supported proceeding with the"Bridging the Valley"plan and providing better freight access to the Sullivan Road Industrial Area north of 1-90. 2-11 Conon unity of Opporton ity S:lck7ne Plar U d Fite :Irrrlllii'it'.'t` SiOfl R pu`t The public is also concerned about maintenance of City streets. Comments received indicated that the public prefers to prioritize street maintenance to avoid pavement degradation. The final two themes that were identified focus on creating better pedestrian connections and investing in the streetscape to promote a better sense of community identity_ The public wants to see improvements made to pedestrian safety as well, including improvements to pedestrian crossings of major streets, particularly near transit stops. There isalso a desire to identify gateways to the City and invest in landscaping and wayfinding, which would support a stronger sense of community character and pride „hi Wall Themes • Improved Gathering Places • Increased Economic Opportunities • Increased Sense of Community Identity • Transportation Improvements Public input from the Vision WciIJ exercise Key. F-i•-;ii:.(is The Vision Wail was a particularly intriguing exercise far meeting attendees. The open- ended nature of thevisionwall allowed members of the public to expressa wide -variety of highlights and issues around the community. Out of the large collection of comments, there were four main themes, which roughly correlated with the topic areas mentioned above. The public expressed the importance of having great gathering spaces throughout the community to enhance the sense of community identity_ Additional comments focused on the importance of economic development and opportunity, including increased access td opportunities and reduced barriers to opening businesses. Transportation also proved to be a major theme, exhibited by comments that related to pedestrian safety and traffic improvements. The public indicated that they are invested in the long-term success of the City, but also want to see increased opportunities in their community as it grows. There was a general sentiment Spokane .000.15Valley CQrrrmunity aiOppe rtwndty 2-12 Sackaiie'v'aliey CorroreI',? P i.ii �7ddt Com i jIii_y Vis•; 1 that the City offers the opportunity for its residents to "grow and play"with great parks and great schools, but there remains opportunities to improve these and other amenities in the future. Meeting eattendeepudicipating in the Vision Won exercise Vision 5;at rnelli; The input received at both public visioning meetings was reviewed against the existing community vision statement to determine the appropriateness of the statement and whether there was a need to modify and improve the statement. Based on the input gathered from the public visioning meetings and subsequent review of the data, the vision statement is still valid and appropriate for the future growth of the community and no revisions are proposed as part of the Comprehensive plan update. While there is still work to be done to fully achieve the community vision, the indications are that the City remains on the right path, "A community of opportunity where individuals and families can grow and play and businesses will flourish andprosper.2" 2 "spokaneValley Cornprehe ive Plan, 2006" 2-13 Comm unity of Opportunity This Page Intentionally Blank Sochneb` Ile'/ComPlan IxJite Comm Lir VisuiReport M PO s -- 3 f'. C K ,�,r; E77:71C1 The City held a "Report -Back" meeting on March 4, 2015 to present the findings of the first public visioning meetings to the public. The purpose of reporting -back was to ensure that the themes that the City heard from the public were accurate and to determine if there were any additional themes or ideas that should be included moving forward. Advertising aril N� lil ,7!irai� The City utilized a variety of outlets to notify community members and stakeholders about the public visioning meetings, including: • Postings on the City's website - Legal notice in the newspaper • Newspaper display advertisement - Posters displayed around Spokane Valley - E-mail notifications Social media (via Spokane Regional Transportation Council [SRTC]) GET INVOLVED! Come learn about the City's efforts to complete the first major update of the 5palcaneValley Comprehensive Plan Pic Vlsiorr:og, iiieport.oack Meeting DID YOU KNO ., A tato, of 125 members of the public attended the peGfic visioning meering held on far?uory 78th & 29tt'i March 4, 2015 March -1, 20' s 'Min &:OO Cenze*Place Regional 4w'ent Center 3 b N. a31 scrnr• rr' Place 5;ck. rr' Valley. WA 99?'T 6'rr Spkaw S%n up dor tqrtrad 1rr rs sod get prgai 4prhxe5a. ha[xlhvvrw.spukanrril Cy:wgrCP Topics include Housing Community Cliaracter Trctisporfatailn EconorniiC I7evefapmeni Graphic of m eetirrg n o Uce for Repo r C-8oc% Meeting pos tE d to website and around the corrmrrrur Pty Report -Back Meeting - March 4 The Report -Back meeting was held at CenterPlace Regional Event Center in Spokane Valley on March 4, 2015. Approximately 74 members of the public attended the meeting. As meeting attendees signed -in at the welcome table, they were asked to participate in a quick exercise. The exercise asked meeting attendees to place a sticky dot in the location of their favorite 3-1 SPthane Talley Community otCp par runty SiaOlcaoe ': :I 1IaifF'}.al'wl°:+F. r r it .Jpdar. Communityb'i>ion Report place in the City of Spokane Valley. The intent of this exercise was to further identify specific areas within city limits that necessitate specific focus throughout the Comprehensive Plan update process. While favorite places were generally dispersed throughout the City, there were a few noteworthy concentrations. The concentration of dots highlighted the importance of parks and recreation facilities as well as the strength of neighborhoods in Spokane Valley. The Mirabeau Point Park area received a total of twelve dots, which made it the highest concentration at 29% of the total responses. The area contains Mirabeau Point Park, Discovery Playground, Centennial Trail, Center Place facility, and the YMCA. Participants made no differentiation amongst these places. Other areas that were noted include the Spokane Valley Public Library (four dots), Valley Mission Park (2 dots), Sullivan Park (2 dots), University Center (2 dots), and Central Valley High School (2 dots). ' L1/fi re 's Your Fa rorite Place frr Spokane b'alfeyr Map results Once all meeting attendees were settled and hada chance to browse the various stations, the City began the Report -Back meeting. A refresher of the overall project was presented to the public in order to inform meeting attencees who were unable to attend the first public visioning meetings. The refresher was followed by a discussion on what the Comprehensive Plan is (and is not) as well as other pians the City has that relate to the Comprehensive Pian. The City then explained the themes that emerged from the public input and haw that input would be used to inform the project as it progresses. The presentation ended with a description, of the exercises and how meeting attendees can express their thoughts and comments on the established themes. The public meeting was set-up in a similar manner to the previous meetings in January, in which there were four topic stations with posters and maps related to the topic. The topic stations included Community Character, Economic Opportunity, Housing, and Transportation. Each station had a poster exhibiting the main themes from the January public meetings with an example of a comment that was received relating to the theme. Meeting attendees were asked to review the themes and consider whether they were accurate or whether there was X1N kants Community oFOpporturriry 3-2 5;?ol,;t:tevalley CcDrt=hert«'I~data war 1r�l.rili;y'ti.i5icr R.2 -per a major theme that vt'as lacking. Meeting attendees were then asked to write their thoughts on a Post -It Note and then stick that note to an area identified on each poster titled, "New Ideas" These comments were then compiled and compared against the established themes to determine if any needed to be adjusted or any additions needed to be made. The City solicited further input from the public to ensure that the identified themes are accurate and appropriate for how the public desires the community to grow. The public was encouraged to provide additional ideas and input on topic areas that may have been missed, but should be included as part of the project scope. Comments received at the four topic stations both reinforced themes as well as provided additional considerations for the Comprehensive Plan update. The same criteria used to develop the themes from the January meetings was used to assess the need for revisions based on input from the Report -Back meeting, with the exception of removing the criteria relating to topic and reap exercises, as it is not applicable in this scenario. The Criteria include: - Quantity and similarity of comments • Applicability of input to the received Comprehensive Plan • Discussions with meeting attendees All input received at the report -back meeting is summarized, by topic area, below. The input summaries are followed by a discussion on how the new input affected the themes discussed in the previous section. The comment matrix in Appendix R displays comments verbatim. Community _hares: r Proposed Themes: • Focus on the area near the proposed • Positive. association with the new city hall Centennial Trail • Increased sense of community identity • increased focus on parks The Community Character themes elicited a variety of input from the public. Comments centered around topics such as parking, preserving neighborhood character, embracing park assets, such as Iliirabeau and the Centennial Trail, promoting walkable neighborhoods, creating better destination spots in the City, and events such as Valley Fest, among others. The new input generally reinforced the three themes of "Increased focus on parks,""Increased sense of community identity,' and "Positive association with the Centennial Trail: No input (neither positive nor negative) was received in relation to the area near the proposed new city hall. Some input identifying additional items for Community Character fall in the Transportation category and the Housing category and as such, are addressed in those themes, 3-3 i'n' ems`` .+,lley. Community of [7pp,ortunV Spak,m-r r:trlIry nrprel)ert n lJDcl to C.4rr1`rt.r1icy Vis ort .;43ort However, based on specific input related to the Centennial Tail and the proposed Appleway Trail, which highlighted a desire to improve and further embrace trails in the community, it is recommended to adjust the theme of"Positive association with the Centennial Trail"to be more action -oriented and align more closely with the comments received. Therefore, the four themes of Community Character will be amended as follows: Final Themes: • Focus on the area near the proposed new city hall • increased sense of community identity • Leverage community trails to improve community character • Increased focus on parks Economic Opportunitv Proposed Themes: • Desire to create special places in the community • Maintain fiscal responsibility • Leverage community assets • Focus on the importance of existing local commercial and industrial areas • Opportunities exist around public facilities • Concern over external forces and Code Enforcement The Economic Opportunity themes did not prove to elicit much of a response from the community. The comments that were received at this exercise station focused on providing better shopping areas (particularly grocer shopping) in the corrmmunity. Additionally, there was a positive reaction to the theme of"Focus on the importance of existing local commercial and industrial areas, but it was noted that there is concern with how this theme will be included in the Comprehensive Plan update in light of a recent moratorium that prohibits new mining operations in the City. One comment focused on adding business recruitment to the Economic Opportunity themes, specifically creating a more inviting atmosphere for startup companies. However, because it does not directly rela-e to the Comprehensive Plan and was only a single comment on the topic" it does not satisfy the criteria to become a neva theme. Comments submitted at other exercise stations also related to Economic Opportunity. Several comments noted that there is a strong desire that the City remain fiscally responsible in their future decisions as well as ensure that future projects are cost effective, which is already a theme. Based on these comments, the Economic Opportunity themes will remain the same. Final Themes; • Desire to create special places in the • Focus on the importance of existing local community commercial and industrial areas Spokane COMM unrty nFOpportunky 3-4 j,;,}.31:.an Valley Com Ran .JrLiato Community \'is.ri i Report • Maintain fiscal responsibility • Leverage community assets • Opportunities exist around public facilities • Concern over external forces and Code Enforcement Housing Proposed Themes: • Housing affordability • Housing for seniors • More and better amenities • Preservation of neighborhood character The Housing exercise station received a Targe portion of the input at the Report -Back meeting. Two of the top concerns expressed at the Report -Back meeting were that there is a need to preserve neighborhood character and that there is a concern with multi -family housing being built in the City, Other comments centered on providing a better and different variety of housing options (e+g, co -housing), ensuring that there are more amenities near housing and neighborhoods, concerns over the adequacy of existing infrastructure and public services to support new development, housing affordability, and parks in neighborhoods. Many of the comments reinforce the proposed themes above. However, based on concerns over housing types beside single-family (which was a dear preference in the Housing exercises at the January public meetings) there is a need to add a theme to address the i55ue raised and ensure that it is incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan update analysis. Therefore, the themes will be amended as follows: Final Themes: • Housing affordability • Housing for seniors • Evaluate different housing types as an option to single-family residential • More and better amenities • Preservation of neighborhood character Meeting 41trerrdees at Report -Back Meeting 3-5 Cornrrunity &Opportunity SI1. ii :are V5Iie`' r ^.111or:?hensive ?Ian Lipchltp C: illr'I'iinit4.Ji ic7r R'_'DCrt Transportation Proposed Themes • Level of Service policy works well • Improve freight movement and safety • Improve connections far other modes • Invest in streetscape and Community of travel Character • Focus on maintenance and technology The Transportation exercise station received much input during the Report -Back meeting. Comments spanned a variety of topics; some of the top issues raised include a need to focus on increased safety for bike and pedestrians facilities and the need for more parking for Valleyfest. Additional comments raised issues such as the need for increased road and intersection safety, the need for improved sidewalk connections in neighborhoods, and concerns related to railroad crossings, including the "Bridging the Valley" concept. These comments all reinforce the proposed themes. After review of the input received one change was made. The input relating to increased bike and pedestrian safety is intended to be reviewed as part of the theme,"Improve connections for other modes of travel, but there is a need to make that more dear„ Therefore, the theme will be changed to address that particular input relating to safety. Input relating to parking will not change the proposed themes due tri the fact that the parking comments related specifically to one event instead of a city-wide need. While parking issues will be considered in the evaluation to be done for the Comprehensive Plan update, it is nota major theme of the input received. Therefore, the Transportation themes are updated only as follows: Final Themes: • Level of Service policy works well • Improve connections and safety for other modes of travel • Focus on maintenance and technology • Improve freight movement and safety • Invest in streetscape and Community Character Stiokane Cammanfry oropporruniry Meeting attendees at Report -Bock Meeting 3-6 Conclusion The themes have been refined to reflect additional itis the intent to use these themes throughout the refining the approach as the project progresses. In Ccrnmunity Character: • Focus on the area near the proposed new city hall • increased sense of community identity Economic Opportunity: • Desire to create special places in the community - Maintain fiscal responsibiiity • Leverage community assets Housing: • Housing affordability - Housing for seniors • Evaluate different housing types as an option to single-family residential Transportation ▪ Level of Service policy works well • Focus on maintenance and technology • Improve connections and safety for other modes of travel • • Corr pr 1(2.- sive I.f ' 1Jpdare C',1rnrilLI(I VVi5ion keper� input received at the Report -Back meeting. Comprehensive Plan update process, summary, the themes are as follows: Leverage community trails to improve community character Increased focus on parks • Opportuniities exist around public facilities • Focus on the importance of Pxisting local commercial and industrial areas - Concern over external forces and Code Enforcement • More and better amenities • Preservation of neighborhood character • Improve freight movement and safety • Invest in streetscape and Community Character The City will incorporate the input and themes deI/eloped herein and use that information to outline and direct. We Currdpi Tr_ri5ive Plan update. The Community Vision Report closes the Phase 1 public J ilicii:mcini _ir<d progresses the Comprehensive Plan upda Le pros s, into Phase 2, which will inclr.cte rr.ore substantive review of Tic£; s and pokicies in iiia. rxislii u Comprehensive Plan ani development of a draft Plan, ire :I..idiny a leve' of er,viro:irncntJ review. Public participazion v'ill re.!nt:lin a cornerstone of the C ompre,it,ns',ve Fla - upc.i!lc tar cess in Phase 2 and Phase 3. hr' public is encouraged d l e: stay informed of th::, project by ,,;4 nr1y up for e-mail alerts at wv,.w.spol<: n:,.rallcy.orc .'(:l-'_ Spi} .0,00Valley Co imcl,-0,ofQpporrunoty This page Intentionally gunk ap ak:The lkl ey Coin re rNnsiV Pl:i:i J r_I<�k Community iRey.port APP ENDICE5 Appendix A Meeting jVl terials - J :n dtry 23 3129, 2015 Public Visioning Meetings Copies of the materials presented to the public at each meeting Appendix B Meeting Mater` 6s - MM1wch Wit, 2C i ; . 3acEc fs i r' Copies of the materials presented to the public Appendix C Public Cornr«,enc iiilz,;:!;• Matrix of all responses received to date and responses from Staff .0,00Valley Comrnuniry air pportwOry This Page Intentionally Blank 5 `::011-!p rehen sive Plan U;acit,Ce tJ ilnlUnity ViSii)n Rely �.7 r: APPENDIX A Meeting Materials -January 28 & 29, 2015 Public Visioning Meetings Al lrl a ne ■,-Valley, Camr uniryof Crap laver City of SpokaneValley Comprehensive Plan Update PublicVisioning Meeting January 28 & 29, 2015 CenterPlace Regional Evert Center poln' Valley. 1'. 4Pl111.rr!r1f1. flerrrf Part 1: Project Overview Overview of Growth Management Act (GMA) and Comprehensive Plan Update process Agenda Part II: Spokane l alleyVision Overview of Community Visioning Part 111: Community Comment and Input Overview of Exercises Stiokane Walley- Part 1 Project Overview SOlane Valley. ('vteirritrrtin' e1 Cfpp w-frrrrris- Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A The GMA sets planning goals and requirements for local jurisdictions, with emphasis on deference to local planning actions. The GM's fourteen required planning goals include the following: • sprawl reduction • concentrated urban growth • affordable housing ▪ economic development • open space and recreation • regional transportation • environmental protection 115 Valley. ,10.112.111111V ,}fLNJ77J11dL° r.; 0/1/1011101.10, • property rights • natural resource industries • historic lands and buildings • permit processing • aublic facilities and services • shoreline management • early and continuous public participation Comprehensive Plan Basics "The GLIA establishes the primacy of the comprehensive plan. The comprehensive plan is the starting point for any planning process and the centerpiece of local planning. Development regulations (zoning, subdivision, and other controls) must be consistent with comprehensive plans." Source; Alunicfpai Research and Services Center Siiokane Valley. C'l.rirrrrrm2 ni'Clpeartio.w pal rye`' f aJdnderothi.I� :Jown Com.rehensive Plan Basics Washington State Growth ManagementAct RCW 36,70A Spokane County and Cities Countywide Pfonning Policies SpokarieValley Comprehensive Plan Spokane Valley Deve/opr-nent Reulitions SpokaneValley Comprehensive Plan The Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan (SVCP) establishes a vision for the future of Spokane Valley during a 20 -year period and responds to the requirements of the CLIA • The existing SVCP contains the following dements: r3u kane Valley. Land Use Transportation Capital Facilities Housing Private/Public Utilities Economic Development Natural Environment Parks, Recreation & Arts Neighborhoods Bike & Pedestrian inimmo.=--••••=mmenimmumull Update Phases Phase I Public Participation Program Data Gathering CommunityVisioning c) Phase 2 Draft EIS (necessity of EIS to be determined at end of Phase 1) Draft Comprehensive Plan Elements Draft Edits to Development Regulations fzo Phase 3 • Final Draft EIS (if needed) • Final Draft Comprehensive Plan Elements • Final Edits to Development Regulations • Adoption Sifibliane Valley. Update necessary background information, inventories, and existing conditions Implement the Public Participation Program to ensure continuous participatlan Stiokane f' 33h3J33rrrrrri.ref(;. r+rlrrrtrrr Review the vision for the development of the community Update Process Develop goals, pclicics, and objectives consistent with the vision Amend the Zoning Code and other development regulations as needed to ensure consistency with updated Comprehensive plan Update Process Update necessary background information, Inventories, and existing conditions implement the Public Participation Program to ensure continuous participation Review the vision for the development of the community p ikane Valley. Comp If 9r.OAF.' hamiy Develop goals, policies, and objectives consistent with the vision Amend the Zoning Code and other development regulations as needed to ensure consistency with updated Comprehensive Plan Update necessary background information, inventories, and existing conditions Implement the Public Participation Program to ensure continuous participation Spcian ems' i �IIdL.N111117Fi' (j Opp,NYlilllli' Update Process You are here Review the vision for the development of the community Develop goals, policies, and objectives consistent with the vision Amend the Zoning Code and other development regulations as needed to ensure consistency with updated Comprehensive Plan Visioning Process Phase 1 Citizen Amendment "Report Back" Request (CAR) Visioning Meetings Visioning Meetings Meeting* January February! 2015 March 2015 ioliane Valley C'niwlurirrh° 01-C)1,14, lrrruf+ May 2015 Planning Commission Mtg. *Deadline for submitting a CAR application is March 31, 2015 Project Roles and Responsibilities o The Public will provide input that will be considered by the Council, Planning Commission, and Staff ® Planning Commission will be the lead advisory body, which entails receiving public comment and forwarding recommendations o City Council is the decision making authority, and will be involved throughout the process ® Staff and Consultants will facilitate the process by conducting outreach, providing technical expertise, preparing recommendations, and facilitating environmental review Spokane MMxl1ey. ['r.r"j& u in° r1 t'E,"e"1"?1f1' Part 11 Spokane Valle Vision Vie. t'ONNUJJ+ium {q Qpp Iwi rs- What is "Visioning" Community visioning is the process of developing consensus about what future the community wants, and then deciding what is necessary to achieve it. A vision statement: Encompasses what community members most value about their community fi Captures the shared image of what community members want their community to become. inspires community members to work together to achieve the vision. 'p ikan Source: Municipal Research and Services Center Valley. r 1: ,iJ"� m ,F trrrrrw Spokane Valley's Vision "A community of opportunity where individuals and families can grow and play and businesses will flourish and prosier." Source: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan `paokane alley. C;(4iu11Mliih' c,,: "A Community of Opportunity' SOokane Walley ( `.4mmrni+1a' n! Ci fpori11IUFv Economic Opportunity • Commercial • Office • Industrial • Manufacturin. Housing • In -fill • Neighborhoods • Multi -Family Community Character • Community Facilities • Parks • Public Services Transportation • Corridors • Trails • Transit Spokane Valley's Vision "A community of opportunity where individuals and families can grow and play and businesses will flourish and prosier." Source: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Spokak a a11ey- f.dilL1MIJI9' rN Opp,: fu+u Part I11 Community Comment and Input SfYokar<e\' Valley ('.��oiniui�rn' r'C];1JMr114wn• Community Input Exercises i. Vision Wall 2. Visioning Topics (4) General guidelines: The exercises are informal and intended to stimulate discussion about the future of Spokane Valley. Please make sure that you visit each station (five total) before leaving. Each station has its own objectives and instructions. Staff is available to answer questions or discuss specific issues. akar C'ouioip,v iw i c.!YJpf,,,rP,Wrr,n- "Opportunity means...,, Vision Wal Table 4 Think about today's discussion and your participation in the different exercises. At this station, you will translate that insight into a statement (or more) on the "vision wall" The vision wall is meant to be an informal way of sharing your input. Consider. o Explaining what"opportunity" means to you and your community. Sharing 3 issues and 3 highlights around the community Writing your version of SpokaneValley's CommunityVision f How do you communicate with your neighbors? What do you like about your neighborhood? 0 What would you like to change in your neighborhood? c) What type of housing does the City need more of? Why? Record your comment(s) on the poster for everyone to see and discuss. SOOkane Valley- rrwrzwrrn'rrf l7pfrrrrYr1rrrn' Members of the Public: Review the Citizen -initiated Amendment Request application and determine if you will be submitting a request (submittal deadline March 31, 2015) o Attend the second set of visioning meetings, which will take place between February and March Next Steps Staff tasks: Compile input gathered at the visioning meetings Prepare a CommunityVision Report ® Prepare an Existing Conditions Report Spokane Miliey- i 5 rrruur,uh• „J Oi.7.4rrlwLl R' Thank you! Thank you for spending your time with us, your input is appreciated! Continue to stay informed by signing up for e-mail alerts at: www.spokaneva!ley. orglcp %Hey. 4'urirrrdrrr7Jm n/ 01,01.,eu a run' Community of Opportunity Public Visioning Meeting— January 28 and 29, 2015 city or Lib riy Lake 0 ti "Where Do You UvelWhere Do You Work?" Lexrir4 "F'" - Nita ethwrin p RR., Ki=m F. Mahn RHY6id 80.14 - cenlemwa Trak Ilkiwy Wm./Myers LIG Vision Handout SOoliane Va_lley. 1 :uar�: ri �araA r iF� Orpahuniody The 5pokaneValley City Council and Planning Commissron held a series of joint workshops in the spring of 2004.The objective of these joint workshops was to draft aVision Statement for SpakaneValley which forms the basis of the Comprehensive Plan.The resultingVision Statement is_ Spokane Valley: "A community of opportunity where individuals and purifies can grow and piay and businesses will flourish and prosper." In the summer of 2005, the City Council adopted a series of core values designed to guide policy decisions in the City.Those core values are: Community Identity and Pride. Spokane Valley promotes an environment that supports the home and family, and job and education opportunities. Highlight areas: • A friendly, wholesome, safe place to live and raise a family, • Preservation of neighborhoods. Focus on the Future, Spokane Valley is a visionary city encouraging its citizens and their government to look to the future beyond the present generation. and to bring such ideas to public discussion, enhancing a sense of community identity. Highlight areas: • A balanced approach to growth and development; • Stewardship of land and resources, such as park, recreation and natural areas; • Preservation and growth of the economic and commercial job base of the community. Open, Collaborative Government, Spokane Valley values a "user-friendly„ government, in which governance practices and general operations consider- how citizens will be served In t:iu-: rr:c.st responsive, effective and courteous manner. Highlight areas: • Citizen participation in the decision-making process; • Strategic use of public/private and other partnerships; • A Can -Do attitude on the part of City employees, and fair and consistent interpretation and implementation of regulations. Public Visioning Meetings I January 26 & 29, 2015 Community of Opportunity Public Visioning Meeting — January 28 and 29,20!5 Cio awvoa rAWEitilkom vague F Liberty L,ke .411 °111 0_y MiE afar.. r..°o.n d... °.a,.Y..,. d..l. H...,.. �.. 1I4.4. —i .riahrY. inni rmNnn ILI i,a�a ...arm r..�rtr�a Fa-� 11-3 C Pedestrian Transportation in Spokane Valley Cernor II.0rr0•.r1 ME w-- I. .Emma. ,s nning.110. i.. .... r .,e L Pan ....,. Rep., Yea .1 Lei. R.vai.0 Sr4.404.-Ann a Fyrp.igyi. - EadaL.aar Community of Opportunity Public Visioning Meeting January 28 and 29, 2015 [. } hili l} a. `bp [3, i.al.t' • J Tr+ansportotron Ito Spokane Voney reRat •ammr. I s,wsA.. An AMI- Ries AAA Ps lam 77 m -2-Ys W... 37.1near 14 Ltr4 Mr r. auw S-11•WedinalaWd a..e'••••r}w•• ,•••••••.4®ter«-...,,.. Transportation Issues Opportunities What works well and what can be improved in Spokane Valley? indicate your top three issues by placing a sdcky dot next to them. Place aac Here Place Lot I -{ere Traffic Congestion GoingWell Room for Improvement Roadway Maintenancu (Pavement Condition, Sweeping, Snow Removal) Going Weld Room far Irnprovement Sidewalks,Trails, Bikeways Residential Street Design (Curbs vs. Swales, Shoulders vs. Sidewalks) Freight Movement Convenient Connections (I can easily get where I want to go using the mode of my choice) Safety on Neighborhood Streets (Speed cif Traffic, Lighting) Bus Service Safety on Arterial Streets (Speed ofTraffic, Crosswalks) Other (Write your priority here) • Public Visioning Meetings f January 28 & 29, 2015 How Should We Prioritize? What projects or strategies should be the highest priorities for funding? In clI Ca[e your top three priorities by placing a sticky dot next to them Place Dat Hare P[aLe dot Her Projects to Reduce Traffic Congestion (new Ianes, new streets) Initiatives to Preserve and Maintain the Existing'firartsportatiDn System (Street Paving, Fix Sidewalks) Technologies to lmproveTraffic Flow (Traffic Signal Synchronization, Intelligent Transportation Systems) Upgrading Unimproved Streets to Current Design Standards Providing for Safe and Efficient Freight Mobility Projects to Improve Crossings of Major Streets Providing a Comprehensive Bikeway & Pedestrian System improvements to Bus Routing and Schedules Neighborboo dTraffie Calming Program Other (Write your priority here) PublicVisioning Meetings 1 January 28 & 29, 2015 pokaneValley Housing What type of housing do you live in? Race a s[icl4ey dot ka the span below. Place not Here Place Dot Here Single Family Properties 0,5 Acre in Size Duplex Single Family Properties c 0.5 Acre in Size Apartments Manufactured Home Park Other (Accessory Dwelling Unit, Senior Housing, Special Needs) Where will you or your extended family want to live in 10 years? Place a sticker dot for you AND all your extended family a [hr. ep,aer b Single Family Properties > 03 Acre in Size Duplex Single Family Properties < 0.5 Acre in Size anufactured Home Park Apartments -111.-11-11.111 Other (Accessory Dwelling Unit, Senior Housing, Special Needs) PublicVisioning Meeting 1 January 28 & 29, 2015 Hou in Vi ion li17cane Spokane Valley Neighborhoods and Housing Washington Stag Growth Management Act (GIM) planning goal for housing: "Encourage the availability of afordabfe housing of all economic segments of the population of this state, promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage reservation of existing housing stack." The City is conducting a required update of its 2006 Comprehensive Plan to stay consistent with state and regional planning frameworks. The update focuses on changes to policies concerning key topics. Spokane Valley's Comprehensive Plan (Plan)Vision Statement describes a desired future for SpokaneValley over the next 20 years. Thinking ahead 20 years, are the themes from the below Land Use Goals (LUG), Housing Goals (HG) or Neighborhood Goals (NG) still important? Have your priorities and preferences changed? • Preserve and protect the character of residential neighborhoods. (From Goal LUG -1 & NG -2) • Preserve and protect the quality of life of residential neighborhoods. (From Goal NG -1) • Encourage a variety of housing types and densities. (Frorn Goal LUG -2) • Improve vehicular and pedestrian connections with infill development. (From Goal LUC-3) • Encourage diversity in housing. (From Goal HG -1) • Utilize proven affordable housing initiatives of regional organizations. (From Goal HG -2) • Accommodate the housing needs of special populations. (From Goal HG -3) • Maintain consistency between adapted plans. (From Goal NG -1) • Encourage neighborhood planning to enhance the quality, vibrancy, and character of commercial, industrial, and minced use properties. (From Goal NG -3) • Strengthen methods for communication between the City and its citizens. (From Goal NG -4) Public Visioning Meetings 11 January 28 & 29, 2015 Community of Opportunity Public Visioning Meeting — January 28 and 29, 2015 Areas that Mow Resadent/a1 Uses Community Character What is "Community Character"? Community character can be difficult to define. Often. it it miide op of p r_emhInatlart of Community Facilities Po -rip in Nitu,-tl Development Environment Pattern( *nd Nrighhnrhnnd densities +I� What does"Community Character" mean to you? Cornn unirr character c_an mean dif ere,t things to different people. When you think aoutwhat Community char`acetr meant to you, you might conifer factors like - Hew wDUlli I describe SpokaneValiryto an outsider: - What is my eorroni i.ty"l Identity? - DDI lige in a cpmmunitythaf offers the amenities that I wane - Art there sufficient community acdwlties co particlpate In? - Do 1 have easy access to parks/ - Art there distinct nelghboncoo- t within the Chid' - Dv 1 hart a strong connection to my neighborhood anal members of my community? - nrr there places that I regularly gather with friends' - Po I enjoy going fon a ,walk in my community? Comprehensive Plan Themes Continue thinking about the conn uhity char:wren of t pn IranoVal ley and what makes it distinct. Then, read each of th0 thrt.c questions belOW, Prate a Sticiff fi6t in tot CQPirnn char you most agree with. Housing PU hlir Services such as Police and Fire PArW'e BAR Lihr.lrira Schools "Because community character encompasses physical, social, and economic elements, the approach can halo to structure plan elements in a way that land use cannot" Source: A Guide to Pionning for Community Character 1 feel that SpokaneValley has great places to gather and meet with friends. SpokaneValley has a clear community identity. I have the ability to easily access community facilities and/or participate in community activities. Yes No was No Yes N n Exercise Instructions Now that you have hada chance to generate snmc ideas and formulate some thoughts related to eonmmunitycharaetor, yon wan he *Mr to put that discussion into action. At this station there If r rrup nn the t..hrw that hEehleghtc the various community facilities in the City flibratyf parks. a nnnrnunity (militias, etc). Thn map is meant to he P you ri.n li.•- I ..,o,ir< ..f"Cswonrunity Character'. inn *pnti1 I ennreue. /intone she map and then fellow these steps: I )Think about the areas of Spokane Yaiieyr that have a strong sense nt community character. Piaci: the gee.. anti in the areas where you feel this- exists. 2 Think about whoro the City should focus future effort to enhance community character, Place the yon— dots in areas whefe yon ant this to happen. 3) Fill out the comment cans with additional thoughts on this topic and give It to theeavrrse I IEt tor. Consider explaining your answers to the Quetttone aeawe. If you antworcd"tion co any of the three questions, what wound you suggest the City do to imprnre upun that 1PublicVisiontng Meetings 1 January 28 & 29, 20.1 5 Community of Opportunity Public Visioning Meeting — January 28 and 29, 2015 berry art Community Character irxarrd o Novas! rubric '-- hsylar I{yk+layy o Pulkm .TAW Vomer - klerieb ❑ aim swum Tedi Gey± r ...,_ - Rafts!!! :[^Pd Pmts Csracnr4al Trail • Lia! --47 IJ ▪ Tr3a:4C94aaV, I @LakcsfRhwrs Community Character SpokaneValley Community Character The City is conducting a required update of its 2006 Comprehensive Plan to stay consistent with state and regional planning frameworks, The update focuses on changes to policies concerning key topics. Spol ane Valley's Comprehensive Plan (Plan)Vision Statement describes a desired future for SpokaneValley over the next 20 years, Thinking ahead 20 years, are the themes from the below Capital Facilities Goals (CFG), Parks and Recreation Coals (PRG) or Bike and Pedestrian Goals (BPG) still important? Have your priorities and preferences changed? - Provide public services efficiently and cost effectively to SpokaneVailey residents. (From Goal CFG-3) ▪ Promote efficient and cost effective library service to SpokaneValley residents. (From Goal CFG-7 ) • Promote facilities and services that benefit Spokane /alley residents regardless of location. (From Geral PRG -1) • Provide a vDriety of opportunities for community involvement. (From Goal PRC -I) m Develop and main:ain a system of parks that provides a broad range of recreational opportunities and access to natural resources. (From Goal PING -2) - Develop and maintain a trail and bike system that provides opportunities for walking, bicycling, skating, and Horseback riding to meet SpokaneValley residents' recreation, fitness, and commuting needs. rFrorn Goal PRG -4) • Implement comprehensive education and encouragement programs targeted at all populations in the City. (From Goal l3PG-3} PubIkVisianing Meetings I January 28 & 29, 2015 What are some population trends in Spokane Valley? Population Growth - Indexed to 2003 In l814, itis estimated that there ant approx i matrty 92,666 people living iat SpokaneValloyt Thls Ii: 19% of the total population In the county. Since about 2008. population growth in the rityr has stewed relative to hie county and state trends. County Population Change Over the last 10 yeats,the County has seen a net positive annual papulation growth.The natural rate of growth (births Fess deaths) has been 54-A Mr and growing over the past decade_The primary driver Of papulation growth (anti Ions) has been m[gratian into the County. Most of the migration has been cycl Ical, iol l owing th c Broader business cycle, with people moving rn the. County during times of econnmir evpansinn and leaving it during recessions. The 2616 law in population migration (more peopTc left than caarto] to County has seen positive growth in recent years. GMA Population Allocations for SpokaneValley r x .^.,...^RRA Sp ne Waller Pop i Mon – – 2001 BCC r ord ton Raodtion la®Ld2036j MIA Err P-raiatIne.koranMtan1.00711– 71111FCC aWm/2bnat,ratNnWm/imp Sir,, a st* int urpor:rtipn, the City has received three G 4A required future population aIle cations that serve as targets for City land use planning -A 2013 dec:siorr has alhlcated an additional 1i1.500 pee pia to the City—targeting a total 2031 papulation of 1015,5 CtO. Spokane County Population Projections Boo 404 1.2.nefA "thrir 3612 200 100 0 ¢ _.r g glERREUIRRA Counts Over the past 2S years, dee County has grown at a rate of 1.12%a year. Future projection of growth prowl Merl by the Office of Ftrrnnrinl t#anagrmrn# (OFM) for Growth Management planning purposes provides a range of potential population forecasts in order to bookend potential futures—these "high"' and "low" projections are supplemented with a "medium" forecast. At the high fnrrrasr, the growth rate inrera set over the historical rate to 11,1%.aoth the medium (0.77%) and low {0.2190 have the County growing more slowly over time, PublicVisikning Meetings 1 January 28 & 29, 201S SSA 210.0 1059 • 109.9 95AI xt.] - 2603 2041 1006 1604 -- •Stale 2067 3001 1049 ..Spokrne Cannly. 1360 1011 Spokane Yen, 2011 2013 3414 In l814, itis estimated that there ant approx i matrty 92,666 people living iat SpokaneValloyt Thls Ii: 19% of the total population In the county. Since about 2008. population growth in the rityr has stewed relative to hie county and state trends. County Population Change Over the last 10 yeats,the County has seen a net positive annual papulation growth.The natural rate of growth (births Fess deaths) has been 54-A Mr and growing over the past decade_The primary driver Of papulation growth (anti Ions) has been m[gratian into the County. Most of the migration has been cycl Ical, iol l owing th c Broader business cycle, with people moving rn the. County during times of econnmir evpansinn and leaving it during recessions. The 2616 law in population migration (more peopTc left than caarto] to County has seen positive growth in recent years. GMA Population Allocations for SpokaneValley r x .^.,...^RRA Sp ne Waller Pop i Mon – – 2001 BCC r ord ton Raodtion la®Ld2036j MIA Err P-raiatIne.koranMtan1.00711– 71111FCC aWm/2bnat,ratNnWm/imp Sir,, a st* int urpor:rtipn, the City has received three G 4A required future population aIle cations that serve as targets for City land use planning -A 2013 dec:siorr has alhlcated an additional 1i1.500 pee pia to the City—targeting a total 2031 papulation of 1015,5 CtO. Spokane County Population Projections Boo 404 1.2.nefA "thrir 3612 200 100 0 ¢ _.r g glERREUIRRA Counts Over the past 2S years, dee County has grown at a rate of 1.12%a year. Future projection of growth prowl Merl by the Office of Ftrrnnrinl t#anagrmrn# (OFM) for Growth Management planning purposes provides a range of potential population forecasts in order to bookend potential futures—these "high"' and "low" projections are supplemented with a "medium" forecast. At the high fnrrrasr, the growth rate inrera set over the historical rate to 11,1%.aoth the medium (0.77%) and low {0.2190 have the County growing more slowly over time, PublicVisikning Meetings 1 January 28 & 29, 201S What are some housing trends in SpokaneValley? Housing Unit Growth - Indexed to 2003 us ev +4 lunrOVNIAMOin MP MI4 An 7W. nn pe. eft 7.R RFC ,Mar tan 31,11.4 Prior to 2006. SpolraneVallcy was adding housing unto at rate faster than the state or -County_ After a lige tag, housing units are growing again. Since Z003. the City has added about 5,000 hoa+sing units. Housing Unit Composition sACO 1. 173201 IA9t0 nano 7.450 e $ , • There are .10,000 housing units in the city. Single family housing males up thr± malorlty of the housing stock (66%). However, the city has added multifamily housing units at alrnas_t three times the rate of single Family homes In tete last decade. Spokane County Multifamily Housing Development l • r Most of the eines multifamily housing is over a decade old and arc In mostly mid-size suuesure (50-100 units) --however, there have been recent new apartment developments as the national- economic situation has i mprored. The location of these structures are in the city'. zones that allow dente h8using. Renter Occupied vs. Owner Occupied Rtnter Occupied xo..ping 2049 2610 SpokaneValey 35.756 36.354 Soo -lane Count., 34.5% 35.6% 2.011 36.5% am% 2012 36.6% 35.7P 2013 376% 36i4 Owner Occupied- Housing 2069 201.0 7623 Spokane Valley Spokane County 64.396 63.7% 53.996 63.4% 62.4% 65.:% 65..O9{ 69.794 64..3% 63.43% City residents are more likely to he owners rather than r6nter6. Huw4ver, renter households (both houses and apartments) make up the majority of new households (including single. and muldfamlly) in the city.The city has fel I(mud broader county {and suitewide and nationalli trends in this regard. Housing Costs Exceed 3O% of Household Income Renters in the city pay a larger ware of their income on housing. Renter households tend tO earn leas than household; that awn their homes -following broader national trends, renters have seen more of their it rnrn gn toward hnusing in the recent years. PublicVisioning Meetings 1 January 28 & 29, 2015 What are some economic trends in Spokane Valley? Service Jobs Growing Servictaproducdng lndustrics are over 70% of the region's grass domestic product, And services are growing faster than goads -producing industries or govemment output.The State Employment Security Department projects 5ervica industry lobs to grow the roost. with half of all job growth by 2011. Jobs Growth and Composition The health care, governmen , and education secaars are the largest employers in the region. Health care and education aro also the fastest growing sectors and are mare cgnttttrated in the Spokane region than the statewide average. Where SpokaneValley Residents Work rv5 .175.15:5•5555f w, c`.-. 3.I,, -k 1 e1F e er. re. The Map shows the relative locations of where city reside/Its wnrk. • 4er4 Mahn ��.—"LLL• Maturractwing and conetrurtion accounted fareuogt of -the decline In employment resulting from the recession stsrtl n` In 20Gl, Overall, employment has Only Increased sI ghtty since the employment kw In 1010, Commute Flow Abput 3-6,888 people commute into Spokane Valley for work. About 22.000 city residents leave the city for work elsewhere, white about 14,000 city residents stay In the city for work. Industry Growth and Composition Thc Chart ahove Shaves the size, concentration, and growth of each employment sensor. The larger the urdc, the more jabs it represents.The higher on the y xis, the more concentrated the se€tor,and the farther to the right o,ti the x.axisethe faster employment grew over the ten-year period. larger circles In tate upper right of the chart Identify sectors that aro significant drivers of the laud economy, Median Household Income sss Ss $15,994- 344;1)34. Sx.000 53.990 21109 9410 9611 2012 3417 gmespeeavalky •Spekane Geunry Medan household Incomes have been flat in recent years reflecting a longer-term trend toward income. sugYatio s. Median intorno; in Spokane Valley are sliglkdy less than the County as a whale. PublicVisioning Meetings 1 January 28 & 29, 2015 How much spending occurs within SpokaneValley? ? Inflation Adjusted Taxable Retail Sales by Sector 52,544.000.060 g2,ao0.6110,000 $1.500,004.004 a $1.0o0.00 OOD $soo 000.odo J I Ii.i.iT I I 1 2603 2004 2005 2006 2047 2008 24129 7910 291E 2012 2013 2014 ■ Other Cnnstna[S1En N Servkes • Retail Retail purchases account for the largest share of taxable retail sales in Spokane Valley, The City realized a sharp increase in retail spending from 2003 to 2006. The City has been rebounding from the recession in 2008; spending in the City is almost back to the pre -recession high How does spending in Spokane Valley compare to other places? Service Jobs Growing • SpokaneValley = $14,744 per person • Spokane County = $9,71 2 per person • Statewide = $9,61 I per person For every person in Spokane Valley the City realizes almost $15,004 in retail spending. This is sizeably larger than the average for Spokane County or the State ofWashington, which is less than $I0,000.This figure indicates fair number of people from outside the City are spending their money there. Retail Sales — Percent Change from 2003 Percent Charge from 2043 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 096 - Spolrine Valley • Spokane Ca.±nty Statewide 21703 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2004 2010 2011 2012 2013- Retail 013 Retail saps in Spokane Valley saw a large increase from 2003 to 2004. Sa es also decreased more during the recession tornpared to Spokane County or Statewide.Sales are still 35% higher in 2013 than they were in 2003. PublicVisioning Meetings January 28 & 29, 2015 Community of Opportunity Public' Visioning Meeting — January 28 and 29, 2015 1 Areas that allow Commercial or inch/stria/ Uses Sa,ermr14444.44 Laird mac Uik LYI,rLY 1 MI Elm MY Crud LINA 0 4 ��mG� PM Mee 0 Pik., B4ril, — P«te ca or, Me 0 rlre Steam ea co+w.e+y _ Senear El ,lrtd ▪ 1-.M,,IUNiren Irdavalk • E,-u,..va, mg 14M NelwroetY - Neu[rial Tlai i ve.xr This Page intentionally Blank Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Update CommunityVision Report APPENDIX B Meeting Materials - March 4, 2015 Report -Back Meeting B-1 CammIrony ofappart lty City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Update PublicVisioning Report -Back Meeting March 4, 20 15 CenterPlace Regional Event Center rie c W .indn, Agenda Part I: PublicVisioning Refresher o Overview of Project Part 11: Purpose of Comprehensive Plan and other related City Plans o Overview of Purpose Part 111: Public Visioning Results o Overview of CommunityVisioning Results Part 1V: Community Comment and Input >\i11ey0 Participation Guidelines Cornrrnnnih of OppwTmiha Part PublicVisioriing Refresher Valley rt,NA Update Phases Phase • Public Participation Program • Data Gathering • Community Visioning ® Phase 2 * Draft EIS (necessity of EIS to be determined at end of Phase I) Draft Comprehensive Plan Elements Draft Edits to Development Regulations ® Phase 3 • Final Draft EIS (if needed) • Final Draft Comprehensive Plan Elements *am' 6 Final Edits to Development Regulations .'tel` o Adoption CRPA:w t}'Qt' p 7rrirn Update Process --1.411.1 Update necessary background information, inventories, and existing conditions Implement the Public Participation Program to ensure continuous participation Stiokane Valley ec+rmminrny of Opponunav Review the vision for the development of the community Develop goals, policies, and obj ectives consistent with the vision Amend the Zoning Code and other development regulations as needed to ensure consistency with updated Comprehensive Plan Update Process Update necessary background information, inventories, and existing conditions Implement the Public Participation Program to ensure continuous participation Review the vision for the development of the community Spokane Valley. Ci -UTE rrrrrrh qJ 0.1vOrrrrrh- Develop goals, policies, and objectives consistent with the vision Amend the Zoning Code and other development regulations as needed to ensure consistency with updated Cornprehensive Plan Update Process Update necessary background information, inventories, and existing conditions Implement the Public Participation Program to ensure continuous participation Sfrokane eO rrnin• You are here Review the vision for the development of the community Develop goals, policies, and objectives consistent with the vision Amend the Zoning Code and other development regulations as needed to ensure consistency with updated Comprehensive Plan Visioning Process "Report Back" Visioning Meetings Visioning Meeting January 2015 Spokane tel'. CampurmilygrOpponwrity Phase 1 Citizen Amendment Request (CAR) Meeting* March 2015 May 2015 Planning Commission Mtg . *Deadline for submitting a CAR application is March 31, 2015 Part 11 Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan and other related City Plans ffikany c� alle - Corun r40oi n• of Opport nr{4. Comprehensive Plan --6-".11411 SOCA The Comprehensive Plan Is implemented by: For example: How these impact you: valley. C'mroaniTL. a}`€ ppormairu Community Goals and Pol icies 1 Regulations 1 1 Determines what can be built where Parks and Recreation Master Plan Plant for funding p arks f Safe Sidewalks to School 1 Im proved pedestrian connections Comprehensive Plan Whatitis Framework of goals and policies influencing SpokaneValley's growth Long-range, general plan Code Enforcement Short-term plan Preparation for future growth Development proposal Reflection of community involvement Stagnant POlcane Valley' C mnoruotvofOpparnwi;ity Other Applicable City Plans City Department Parks and Recreation Master Plan Business Plan Transportation Improvement Plan Capital Improvement Plan Shoreline Master Program Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan nnn pone C,w,fn��,,mry Parks and Recreation City-wide Public Works Public Works Community and Economic Development Community and Economic Development Part III PublicVisioning Results SiZkane Valley. Your Participation How themes were determined ▪ Quantity and similarity of comments received ® Discussions with meeting attendees ® Topic and Map exercises — concentration of dots ® Applicability of input to the Comprehensive Plan vmrro��+n-R. gf l ppeulunifv LFII r" t 1;.v VON kit tr, 11 i': Your Participation Vision Wall Improved gathering places • Increased sense of community identity • Transportation improvements o Increased economic opportunities Your F�articipation Community Character • Focus on the area near the proposed new City Hall ® Increased sense of community identity • Emphasis on parks ® Positive association with the Centennial Trail Spokane dL'aYdrdlffti" I iI Cenrm V�diy O� ��Aor[unjpy . G � Your Participation Economic Opportunity a Desire to create special places in the community ® Maintain fiscal responsibility o Leverage community assets o Concern over external forces and Code Enforcement o Focus on the importance of existing local commercial and industrial areas CD Opportunities exist around public facilities Sgikane �,«. Your Participation Housing Themes 10 Housing affordability o Housing for seniors ® More and better amenities o Preservation of neighborhood character Stiolcane Valley. Currrnrrunr¢•g1'Oppnourrr L Valley Housing Your Participation --.1"..11411 Transportation o Level of service policy works well ® Focus on maintenance and technology o Improve connections for other modes of travel o Invest in streetscape and community character ® Improve freight movement and safety 41er �i id Woi PriorMal SpokaneValley'sVision "A community of opportunity where individuals and families can grow and play and businesses will flourish and prosier." Source: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan "kane Valley. Part IV Community Comment and Input Sffikane CoHri11111111y rOpprrrr i y Community Input Now that you have heard the themes that emerged from previous public input, Staff wants to hear your thoughts on the accuracy of the themes and whether or not you believe that there are additional important and applicable topics that should be included. Visit the four topic stations and review the themes Provide written comment on the themes Discuss with Staff any questions you may have Spaan Valley CnN aJ dolliy g(OppnPfehlin-' Next Steps Members of the Public: • Review the Citizen -initiated Amendment Request application and determine if you will be submitting a request (submittal deadline is March31,2015) Next meeting is anticipated to be held in April, 2015 and will include exercises based on the themes discussed today, with a focus on goals and policies • Sign-up for e-mail alerts at www.spokanevailey.org/CP Staff tas Ips: • Compile input gathered at the report -back meeting • Prepare a CommunityVision Report ® Prepare Existing Conditions information *Wane Walley. CaHfrrrirrPIJ4• r4 Op/J[NTHn n' Thanl<Y�uF Thank you for spending your time with us, your input is appreciated! Continue to stay informed by signing up for e-mail alerts at: www.spokanevalley. orglcp Sifokar's#:'e\' onlunlnitI o Oppa+i'unihy Project Status SPOKANE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE The Comprehensive Plan update is currently in Phase of a three-phase process. The first phase of the project includes milestones such as: • Data gathering and interpretation • Adoption of Public Participation Program (PPP) • Review of Spokane Valley's vision statement • Public visioning meetings and public engagement • Application period for Citizen -Initiated Amendment Requests (CARS) • Development ofa Community Vision Report • Initiation of SFPA review process • Preparation of existing conditions information The information and data gathered during Phase 1 will inform Phases 2 and 3 and determine the general sc=ope of the Comprehensive Plan update. Next Steps Near -terra tasks that Spokane Valley and its consultant team are working on include; • Compile input gathered at the report -back meeting to further inform the planning process and adjust as needed • Prepare for upcoming meeting in April, which will focus on new exercises tail red to these themes • Prepare a Corr munity Vision Report to summarize the public engagement efforts anti input received Upcoming dead! nes and events: • Citizen -initiated Amendment Request (CAR) application submittal deadline is March 31, 2015 • Next meeting will be held in April, 2015 and will include exercises based on the themes discussed today, with a focus on Comprehensive Plan goals and policies Coming Soon—A Community Vision Report with all of this informotiion and more! THANK YOU! Your participation in the development of the Cornprehensive Plan Update plays an important role in the future growth dour City. We appreciateyourtime and effort. Please remember to visit the Comprehensive Plan Update webpage to sign-up for e-mail alerts and get important project updates at: www.spokanevalley.org/CP or by scanning the QR Code with your srnartphone polane .000Valley Sign up for a -maul alerts and ger.' project updates at httpAiwffiw spolaneral Iey orgrCP Public Visioning Meetings Summary Report -Back Meeting March 4, 2015 CenterPlace Regional Event Center Spokane Valley 1 ,CP" Je 1A1 i I NIC9LIkVt err 1 01 tlRL *ILIAt Ctil klAki.IT)! Vi41{Ii,•e;14,41 wo identical public visioning meetings were held in late Jr uary: one in the evening ofJanuary28th and the other in the morning of January 29th. Approximately 125 --Members of the public attended the meetings. The intent of the meetings was to present topic areas derived from the Community Vision Statement and pc se questions to the public to stimulate thoughtful discussion and input. The topic areas included. the Vision Statement, Community Character, Housing, Economic Opportunity, and Transportation. The input received at these meetings has been used to identify major themes in responses to help inform the planning process for the Comprehensive Plan update. The themes were developed in consideration of the following criteria: - Quantity and similarity of comments received - Discussions with meeting attendees - Topic and Map exercises - concentration of dots - Applicability of input to the Comprehensive Plan The following major themes were identified in the responses received from the public at the visioning meeting, including both written and verbal comments received at the exercise stations. Vision Wall Themes • improved Gathering Places - increased Sense of Community Identity • Transportation Improvements • Increased Economic Opportunities Community Character Themes - Focus on the area near the proposed new city hall • Increased sense of community identity • Increased focus on parks ■ Positive association with the Ce ntennial Trail Tabulated Results The following table represents the raw data collected at the Community Character exercise station: Srwe.et4:zr hat‘Owe, 1, 1 ,nee.I with fiends Yes 17 N© 12 4.wiw4,449 w baso claw r. �ity:lL..eAY res 8 30 1 nava uroao#ry maomu.aa,a licW�r• Inrereewilgraes.idat 25 •w 6 Housing Themes • Housing affordability • Housing for seniors • More and better amenities • Preservation of neighborhood character Tabulated €i!e5ults The following table represents the raw data collected at the Housing exercise station: What type of Maim Eo you Ilveln7 Ur* Fare@JhopnnYf ..H.i.c�s on S,ec 24 4 r A.pt,nia OS Ayes Mize i�S 19 po....a.... mloot 1 1 Aperameres 3 Dime i WI , *awn tP. W rewhi 0 Whew .id1t•e •-,...-.•.F••dI wbra ffiIlltsen Tnyuet rle 1, Paapelks Sae x4.5 Arms ms 21e Im1donyMalrreenrrce 112 3 e 17 15 i5aoufarlwedJlwnehai 1 Aranrwraa 3 OYnor stare .rrnwmag•tra .r I k.tlV `AK4e WA3 2.9.r.w 5'. rtiwlrnwn Economic Opportunity Themes • Desire to create special places in the community • Maintain fiscal responsibility • Leverage community assets • Concern over external forces and Code Enforcement • Focus on the importance of existing local commercial and industrial areas • Opportunities exist around public facilities Transportation Themes • Level of Service policy works well • Focus on maintenance and technology = Improve connections for other modes of travel • invest in streetscape and Community Character • Improve freight movement and safety Tabulated Results The following table represents the raw data collected at the Transportation exercise station: Issues and Opportunities Tri1Sc C,•gestla,8 C,-", rdl Via. I 13 Im1donyMalrreenrrce 112 `"- e 17 S4iewalke.lra"=l� AliletvalT 1 25 atesietenhel Sheet ei,l&{Cu � Ix11211. 2 11 F1440 1 1 hiVMNtuS{en (Z.V.Oeln.Cww'u W on t 1I ealgyi et rrtlere l WJfl6 loge the mode of 14 5 Safety on IhiOballcad Streeel!Speed arr•Ife. 115 Bul52Moe 6 13 Soci Wino r,a Ar Mal 5,,CCUPprolog rsaf . ChalsrmlYe7 p 6 I to er L 1t M' t.r..rP,lo.IR' l'...0 1 .Nrel Stint. 10 .,,.mam., Prioritization A*pecesto lie,e3[eTurTt Cdtitiliht !new Doer. ne.v sleeenI 11 r�larr� wr�a.c arrtiotar Natal ate EahHr.� Transplarrain, *Fe. 22 l u.L re ingles !Dinner 11,1fit Flow ill .. ifi im.Lrrlgcm 'M1r.rortrucim•irlwmi Prmid nits Sai Vag Efkien l Fret hM M»Wi.4r Pratdi g a {nmfnitereire gi4ewar P•e•lblln Warn HalghlandreodTrahic Cairn in.9 Pre9rarn 25 15 19 9 Improvements nn Bus IadulirtydM S€hedtfrr 12 20 10 Community of Opportunity PublicVisioning Meeting — March 4, 2O l S — iborry Like ley====.7,==. ` . Whrrr is your fuvorite place in Spokane Valley? 4i 6 HoiDloal - MAIN Ntfwats p pare54.,mn -k .ass IF -4. Guts` - 296n113 • *NA - C.nlmxAl-Tiad II 111. 41. 1-1 LOC AZtnr5 ® Tia localim Ndo. L ^..4 Community Character Public input Themes Focus on the area near the proposed new City Hall ; rPt- • d S , km hnm,mu.Rr.Mc+bI. Comrnent received : "University/Sprague area could use more community development for residences in that area!' Increased Sense of Community Identity Comme:... Received : "There Zeds to be more emphasis on creating a more beautiful, more recognizable city." Emphasis on Parks Comments Received : "Need pocket parks." and "Stress more environmental amenities — parkslrnore natural areas" Positive Association with the Centennial Trail Comment Received : "The portion of the Centennial Trail that passes through SpokaneValley is very scenic and well -kept. My favorite portion of the trail!" New Ideas: �M�wwtiwM PublicVisioning Meeting 1 March 4, 2015 Community of Opportunity Public Visioning Meeting — March 4, 2015 i iiyof k.iasrry Lake r L ElAreas of Community C haracier V Areas that could he Enhanced Co mmulnity Character !-r5rnrl o r 0 Poke Farman o Fire: St,uon Schml ▪ libuary ® Transit Lttatum Putt. /LAM misty imSwam. Valley Ta i Comer � PPM; uGn F7i._+rc./i«,.er: { — LL pr FLS^wY' -�-�• NaiFwu --•� Gerrtzuva I TraiI Economic Opportunity Public lnputThemes Desire to Create Special Places in the Community Comment Received: "Spoicarralley lacks a strong identity—no gathering place." Maintain Fiscal Responsibility Comment Received: "Budget surplus not a deficit." Leverage Community Assets Comment Received: w do we leverage the trails for economic development" Concern over External Forces and Code Enforcement Comment Received: "How does the north/south freeway affect SpokaneValley?" Focus on the importance of Existing Local Commercial and Industrial Areas Comment Received: "What can we do at the incaustrial park?" Opportunities Exist Around Public Facilities Comment Received: "Ei-zough land around [proposedl new city hail for public market." New ideas: Public Visioning Meeting I March 42015 Community of Opportunity PublicVisioning Meeting - March 4,2015 Ce01ilLwood -- tynf i belly Lake Ecanamk OpparcednilioN Natad at Vision Meeting _Air mhadt... sr ,•••• Lerent 1 -1.4e -g ma Park ▪ nava MAP = cry nal. niECKM ▪ I trail! - - AIWA ▪ Latta L seats. - CtenterkasiTna Housing Public Input Themes Housing Affordability Comment Received:"Location & availability of low cost multi -family residential" & "The availability of good quality homes at a goodffair price." E.. 7L1121-3 Housing for Seniors Comment Received:"No doubt that the need for senior housing, including those with disabilities, shall grow" and "With the aging population the need for more low income housing, as it is currently, will increase." More and Better amenities Comment Received: "Must be proximate to varied transportation alternatives as well as shopping (including pharmacies), health care and other services." & "Proximity to parks, transportation to work" Preservation of Neighborhood Character Comment Received:"l believe we need to stop urban sprawl build up not out. This will heap condense our city and make a more prosperous environment." & `{Keeping old home areas from being neglected. Encourage people to move into them instead of taking more land for new houses in our best natural areas". New Ideas: Public visioning Meeting I March 4,2015 Transportation Public lnputThemes Level of Service Policy Works Well Comment= received: "Everything is close by; not a lot of congestion" Focus on Maintenance and Technology Comment. Received: "Fill potholes; don't let our streets look like Spokane's" Improve Connections for Other Modes ofTravel Comment Received: "More frequent bus service would be nice" "Please add sidewalks on the roads to my neighborhood school." Invest in Streetscape and Community Character Comment Received: "You don't know when you enter theValley - develop some gateways" "The streets look barren - plant more street trees" Improve Freight Movement and Safety Comment Received: "Proceeding with Bridging theValley." New Ideas: �ti'11�"tii' �a ��.—.rte✓-r Publicvisioning Meeting! March 4, 2415 This Page intentionally Blank APPENDIX C - Public Comment Matrix C-1 Spa ka ne Valley Comprehensive PIa n U pda#e Community Vision Report COMMUrrkyof 3ppo,Foray COMMENTS AND RESPONSES PUBLICViSrONARY ME INX JANUARY -28, 2G15 & JANUARY 29, 21115 Spokane Valley PublicCornnient Matrix 1 January 28& 29 PublicVisianing Meetings VNF 59963 1 3J23/201S COMMUNLTY CHARACTER STAFF RESPONSE 1. Spokane Valley is givirlg the impression that al they are interested in is developers & their making money. Where is the emphasis on natural elements Comment noted; the Natural Environment Element will be reviewed as part of the update process 2. The portion of the Centennfai Trail that passes through Spokane Valley is very scenic and well kept. My favorite portion of the trail! Comment noted 3. I love the portion of the Centennial Trail through the Valley. If they could separate it on Upriver Dr. and through Millwood to make it safer and more usable_ Comment noted 4. NE corner of Pines/Sprague-conderrin the old Albertsons store- either develop it or turn it into something nice. Comment eotcc; '_u ,E,cstinri s outside of scope of Corevehensive Plan update 5. Favorite Places - Spokane County Library- for all a mind can absorb. (:ninnier :: i .o rd 6. Stress more envirorevientaI amenities - parks/mare natural areas. Cpm merL i.°lled; the Parks, Recreation, and the Arts and Lre'tiatura' Environment Elements will be reviewed as part c` the uprate process 7. Love the Centennial Trail, the library resources, the family orientation & safety of the Valley. New park in Greenacres n a pias. Recycling program. Issues; - Trains need better regolatior's re: how long they block an Intersection & need more overpasses between Sullivan & Newman Lake_ - Marijuana shops - we have two in Greenacres walking distance to Greenacres Middle School. Why? - Vacant buildings -way too marry -take them down or discount them to promote urban growth. Continue to support a bicycle friendly city. - Set dear standards for businesses - Greenacres Auto is ugly - the north fence is in pieces & there are no clear standards - fix it. - Restaurants - we need to encourage small business to set up great food places similar to Spokane not box restaurants. Rental vacancies - What are they? Where is the data - We need to set same standards for vacancy rates beforewe build more multi -housing. - Developers - need standards to widen streets & add traffic lights clear to the freeway before building multiple houses. Could use a TraderJc es in the Valley. Comments noted; m1 ley of these iopirs will be revic.weTi .,.!; m,r' a' the update process B. Yellow dot Bowdish & Sprague -seems Ilke a natural economic gathering area. Comment noted 9. i would like to see the city get more involved with small business. I see them doing very little to nurture existing businesses. Comment noted; the Economic Development Element will be reviewed as part of the update process Spokane Valley PublicCornnient Matrix 1 January 28& 29 PublicVisianing Meetings VNF 59963 1 3J23/201S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STAFF RESPONSE 19. [Diagram] I would like to see the River "Canyon' preserved ase natural hiking camping area on the North side of the'River between Plants Ferry or (Trent Rd and Sullivan Road) to the brow of the canyon (about 1,00D feet from the river as the land rises) to the North or East. This area on the north side of the river is a tiny wildlife preserve. it has the graves and foundations of the home of the early settlers. It is largely covered in bunch grass and has a peaceful and magical atmosphere due to facing the sunset anti being its own little col t::r.wood ecosystem — this area has been horse pasture land for the past 75 to 100 years. People could wal!L across Trent Bridge to access it. You could call it the Bridge Recreational Area. It would Comment noted Spokane Valley Public Comment Matrix !January 28 & 29 ikiblic /isio-ning Mr t�-,a VNF 5995:I2,1 COMMt1MTV CHARACTER STAFF RESPONSE 1C. I weuld like more retail shops at the Old U_ City, next tie the future City Hall. Comment noted; this area has ben identified as a theme, deserving specific focus in the update process 11. There needs to be more of emphasis on creating a more beautiful, more recognizable city. Streets would have more trees and more pedestrian friendly. There would be gateways to show when you enter the City of Spokane Valley. Neighborhood development would be more like Liberty Lake in the sense that they promote community, biking/walking, parks, etc, I'm tired of the big bvx development and sea of asphalt that is our current identity. Let's beautify our city i. Comment noted; increasing the sense of community identity is a theme of the update process and will be reviewed in the Housing, Land Use, and other Elements 12. Bridge the Valley Barker, Pines, Park > Over Trains Comment noted; freight mobility is a theme of the update process and will be reviewed as part cf the Transportation Element 13. Railroad crossings — work with all partners like police, bre, residents to get funding for crossings, Cam+rnent noted; freight mobility is a theme of the update process and will he reviewed as part of the Transportation Element 14. *Bridging the Valley at Barker & Trent — hazardous intersections now and will be much worse with increased Comment noted; freight mobility is a theme of the update process and will be reviewed as part of the Transportation Element train use. Thanks! 1S. The YMCA area is a great area — allows for gathering by bus, car, bike, etc. iii if expanded, could draw more community. • University/Sprague area couId use more community development for residences in that area. Comment noted 16. Need pocket parks? Dues not seers to be many per the map. Comment noted; increased focus on parks is a theme of the update process and will be reviewed as part of the Parks, itecreation, and Arts Element 17. 'Sense of place' Continuation of Central Gathering Place Opportunity (1) in city; (7] Pines & Sprague. Miraheau is our jewel. Comment noted 18. West entry area; south of freeway to Park more foot traffic— neighborhood feel Comment noted ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STAFF RESPONSE 19. [Diagram] I would like to see the River "Canyon' preserved ase natural hiking camping area on the North side of the'River between Plants Ferry or (Trent Rd and Sullivan Road) to the brow of the canyon (about 1,00D feet from the river as the land rises) to the North or East. This area on the north side of the river is a tiny wildlife preserve. it has the graves and foundations of the home of the early settlers. It is largely covered in bunch grass and has a peaceful and magical atmosphere due to facing the sunset anti being its own little col t::r.wood ecosystem — this area has been horse pasture land for the past 75 to 100 years. People could wal!L across Trent Bridge to access it. You could call it the Bridge Recreational Area. It would Comment noted Spokane Valley Public Comment Matrix !January 28 & 29 ikiblic /isio-ning Mr t�-,a VNF 5995:I2,1 Spokane Valley Public Comment Matrix 1 January 28 & 29 Public Visioning Meetings VIaF 59963 1 3/23/2015 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STAFF RESPONSE be a shame to build factories there Trail. & building there would ruin the most beautiful part of the Centennial Ell i 1J In as LL EC .ES 1a ,y 4.d i.. L4 EX Y. � Ela L2 t Y 20. Favorite SV Places& Whys • Centennial Trail — especially infnear parks and by the river_ o Why? Beauty and outdoors setting • River o Why? Natural beauty Comment noted 21. We need tournament quality complexes for soccer. softball, baseball, Lacrosse, cross country in the Valley, These will draw large crowd from out of town & help motels, restaurants, and retail. Comment rioted; the Parks, Recreation, and Arts Element will be reviewed as part of the update process 22. Work or bridging the Valley; form a group consisting of fire, police, business owners & residents to lobby the legislature for the project. Comment noted; freight mobility is a theme is a theme of the update process and will be reviewed as part of the Tra nsportation Element 23_ Focus on efforts to develop a 'downtown' core that will function & be recognized As an area of commerce, services Si vitality, Comment noted; desire to create special places in the community is a theme is a theme of the update process and will be reviewed as part of the Land Use, Economic Development, and other Elements 4. Accessibility_ Comment noted 25. Your Economic Development Questions? • How will oil trains impact us? • How about overpass and grade separation from trains? o "Barker,. "Pike, etc_.," + Haw does the north/south freeway affect Spokane Valley? Comment noted; freight mobility is a theme of the update process and will be reviewed as part of the Transportation Element 26. Spokane Valley's Biggest Economic Issues? • Quality education (and affordable) • What do we do about Sprague (Appleway) Ave, "sorriest street west of MI," o And Argon Mullet Couplet area? • What can we do at the industrial park? • Protecting the integrity and well-being of our workforce. • Positive "brand" and reputation_ Comments noted; many of these topics will be reviewed as part of the update process Spokane Valley Public Comment Matrix 1 January 28 & 29 Public Visioning Meetings VIaF 59963 1 3/23/2015 Spokane Val ley Public Carurnent Matrix 1 January 28 & 29 Public Visioning Meetings VNF 599G3 1 3/23/2615 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STAFF RESPONSE • Spokane Valley lacks an identity—nogathering place. • Find ways to create more income and investment. • lack a community identity. • Make it easier to open a business. • Barker Road —trains and decay and overpass. • Focus on retail development, • Housing capacity and growth. • Housing affordability and price points. • How do we get mare infill (housing}? • How_ can we get better performance from our economic sectors? 27, City Government's Economic Development Priorities? • Budget surplus not a budget deficit 011. • Focus on mixed-use — activity center—like Perry St in Spokane. • How do we leverage the recreational trails? • Enough land around new city hall for public market. ■ Medical marijuana regulation enforcement (Al ■ Prioritrze people over dollars. • Don't turn back on the river — San Antonio River walk. ■ Leverage trails. • Create a beautiful place tar people and residents. • Codc cnforccncrt [weed control]. • Need better cies.-y-i 4uidelines, • Fair share of tourism tax. o Need marc regional equity. • Iviuseurn needs parking. • Focus on community scale/neighborhood scale commercial development. ■ Focus an sense of place—gathering places. • Can we put more housing around good schools? • Improvements to river access. • Waterfront regional "destination" park. • Take pride in the community. o Clean up code violations. Be progressive in city improvements to clean up Sprague. Comments noted; many of these topics will he reviewed as part of the update process 28. Questions about Spokane Volley's Economy? • Now is the city recovering from the recession? • How has the mall performed over time? Comments rioted Spokane Val ley Public Carurnent Matrix 1 January 28 & 29 Public Visioning Meetings VNF 599G3 1 3/23/2615 Spokane Valley Public Comment Matrix 1 January 2a & 29 Public Visioning Meetings N F 59963 1 3/23/2915 TRANSPORTATION STAFF RESPONSE 29. Need traffic speed enfnrc meet an N. Conklin to preserve and protect residential neighborhoods. Comment noted; preservation of neighborhood character is a theme of the update process and will be reviewed as part of the Housing Element 33. Better visibility at major intersections —Sullivan & Saltese — other Comment noted 31. I would like to see more "staple" bicycle racks in the Valley. The ones in Spokane [diagram] are very attractive and lend a feel of statuary and cla55. The "normal" bike rack seems to add little beyond functionality, A mechanism in the Comprehensive Plan might moble businesses and our city to increase availability_ Thanks. Comment noted 32. Streetscaping, please! This would help in many ways; including • Community beauty = community pride • Friendlier for pedestrians • Makes you feel like people care about the place • Makes the community attractive for people looking to move here Comment noted; invest in streetscape and community character is a theme of the update process and will be reviewed as part of the Transportation Element 33. 3 lane University Road 4th to 32'd 3 lane. McDonald Hawk signal vic. Of Chas Health Finish ,4 ppleway Trail North/South Connector in between Vista & Park on Sprague/,4ppleway 3 lane Dishman Mica ifs{h to Univ. a -site Comments noted 34. Transportation movemei•t ;: r: v r g traffic) seems to be lagging immensely behind technology. When I am sitting at traffic lights wac:,;r =i me & resource when there is no cross traffic, I'm asking the question, why? Can't we have in tel trric r, ntroF? The technology is here- I'm sure part of the issue is $ but it seems we could bernovint in Thaldirection. Comment noted; focus an maintenance and technology is a theme cf the update process and will be reviewed as part of the Transportation Element 3S. Enforce or change code regulations to disallow out -of -proportion storage barns, workshops, etc. in residential zones, especially planned communities. Several Large (larger than the actual houses) have moved Into my neighborhood. Along with that, they park their business trucks, trailers, equipment in the street, totally changing the character of the neighborhood_ Comment noted 36. Engage and educate citizens of the effect of leaving months of trash bags on your porch, old furniture and appliances in front of homes. Encourage pride of home ownership by maintaining property and yard, That way others will be encouraged to move and/or visit our city. Comment noted 37. 1. Bridging the Valley 2. Traffic light at Pines & NIirabeau Pkwy 3. Sus service on Mirabeau Parkway Comment noted; freight mobility is a theme of the update process and will be reviewed as part of the Transportation Element 3$. 1. More access to public transportation 2. Clearing off bushes/trees around intersections Comment noted Spokane Valley Public Comment Matrix 1 January 2a & 29 Public Visioning Meetings N F 59963 1 3/23/2915 TRANSPORTATION STAFF RESPONSE 3. Reflector an til stop signs like at enwdish & 16th 39. Privatize public transportation m jorly. Only a few arterial routes mar need frequent stops and be serviced by"traditional buses-" - - However, create an opportunity for most of public transportation to be accomplished by indeperid ent small business (individual or sm. size business/Ilmlt # mini -vans a business can operate).. These vans corse to the site, home, apt, business etc., provide small amenities a$ needed. This provides the 'comfort' & convenience Americans, certainly WA pop}ilation appreciate. Therefore more• using, movability. This increases jobs! • • This Greatly decreases city expense of purchasejrent -naintenance.of standard laig city buses., And is easy on roads. Other cities have added this service to their communitiesiivith g!reatsuccetS. The policy and procedures for such a service may already be in existence_ If•not, regulations need to be made for liability insurance, competence to be a driver, etc. Thank you for thinking about this!l Today we have huge, noisy, (umbering (mostly empty) buses cruising along infrequen IN; people getting wet or too hot or too cold waiting, etc. These buses are a great expense for a city to have. If we have city transportation system, let It be servicing only arterial and major areas! Comment noted; suggestion is outside of scope of Comprehensive Plan update. Spokane Transit Authority (STA) is the operator of bus service throughout Spokare County 40. Public transportation —from University west are every 15 min & Sat. —going east every half hour every hour Saturday. Not frequent enough especially to the mall. No benches -shelters. Comment noted HOUSING STAFF RESPONSE Qi: Over the next 2,0 years, the most important housing need will be; 41. I believe we need to stop urban sprawl build up not out. This will help condense our city and make a more prosperous environment. Comment rooted 42 Ilousing for young fmi lie. Comment noted 43. 1. Affordable senior housing. 2. Keeping the feel of the Valley- some open spaces & valuing families- Comment noted; housing for seniors is a theme of the update process and will be reviewed as part of the Housing Element 44. Affordable housing—smaller lots Comment noted; housing a[fcrLai: y and housing options are themes of ;he Jpda`7. process and will be r:•- a<-, part of the Housing Element 45. The availability of good quality homes at a goodjfair price. We need to encourage more home ownership. Comment noted; ho;,- ,,^ a;-nrrir1:-'it/ and housing o torls ar_- t'errr c_ ; ;.:.. nriate process a - d -F-'i 1 be rcvh- •._••:•,-- ,- -.-. of the hous;r. E-1—rent 45. With the aging population the need for more low income housing, as it is currentIy, will increase. Apartments & manufactured home parks will be a much needed help. Hoping MH Ps will be an included Comment noted; hear•,•,_2•=-i6-::ry:, !:'•. ,.nd housing options arc =,-..21-ie-]- c,t 7.r.0 a :ci Spokane Valley Public Comment Matrix I January 23 & 29 PuD• ' • 51,2ni n rrlaaiieas UNF 199,53 , HOUSING STAFF RESPONSE option in the coming pian. process and will be reviewed as part of the Housing Element 47. Proximity to park, transportation to work Comment noted; amenities near housing is a theme of the update process and will be reviewed as part of the Housing Element 43, Next 20 years— Housing: No doubt that the need for senior housing, including those with disabilities, shall grow. Must be proximate to varied transportation alternatives as well as Shopping (incl, pharmacies), healthcare and other services. Comment noted; housing for seniors is a theme of the update process and will be reviewed as part of the Housing Element 49. Respect the right of single family housing. Do not rezone forcing out the single family. Comment noted: preservation of neighborhood character is a theme of the update process and will be reviewed as part of the Housing Element 50. Disability: • affordability • transportation • jobs/employment + traffic lights • accessibility Comment noted HOUSING STAFF RESPONSE CO: What 3 housing issues are important to you? 51. • Preservation of neighborhood character— Planned Community • Don't allow large shed bldg. • Don't allow non-residential uses— business equipment Comment noted; preservation of neighborhood character is a theme of the update process and will be reviewed as part of the Housing Element 52. Keeping old home areas from being neglected -- Encourages people to move into them instead of taking more land for new houses in our best natural areas Comment noted 53. = Provide a variety of housing types to accommodate different populations. Comment noted; housing options is a theme of the update process and will be reviewed as part of the Housing Element Comment noted; suggestion does not directly relate to Corn pr el.Lrir,ive Plan uprate 54, Concerned about the burned out duplex on the NW corner of Broadway & M irparette and the mess that is the backyard. It has been there for over a year. Itis in ri, nei 'Hboriiuud.. v2 or Id love to see it cleaned up. 55. . Location & availability of low cost multi -family r5sider.:al - micro shopping areas associated wl larger hoL slrg areas • Revitali2ation of western valley areas Comment nolo.l; housirr aft'ordabiiity and housing options are VIemes of the update prod,,S and will be reviewed as part of the Hpuirg EI,Rment Spokane Valley Public Com nit rrt Matrix 1 January 28 & 29 Public Visioning Meetings VN E 59963 1 3/23/2015 HOUSING STAFF RESPONSE IZ; What 3 housing issues are important to you? 56, 3 housing Issues: • Availability of affordable land; properly zoned for multifamily and/or mixed use. • Flexible development resource tools: a Density bonuses c� TDRs (Transfer of Development Rights) a Infrastructure (Tax) Finance Tools: T1Fs, LIFTS, etc. • Education about/incentives for: o Mixed income cornrnunitles/nelghborhoc s Comment notes[; housing affordability and housing options are themes of the update process and will be reviewed as part of the Housing Element HOUSING STAFF RESPONSE Q3: Thinking ahead 20 years, are the themes from the below Land Use Goals [LUG), Housing Goals (KG} or Neighborhood Goals ANG) still Important? Have your priorities and preferences changed? 57. 58. What percent of the population are under 20? Over 60? Whom are we planning for: kids or retirees? Shopping hubs integrated with entertainment {restaurants, pubs, theaters) integrated with apartments (above the retail) look at Riverstone in [illegible] Comment noted Comment noted; amenities near housing is a theme of the update process and will be reviewed as part of the Housing Element 59. Themes/P rioritlesf Preferences: • Just a concern that the first 2 "bullets" (and goals LUG -1 & NG -2) be carefully addressed to not foster "Nimby-ism." • As population & population density grows—and especially if light-rail is actually developed — add cols to encourage & incentivize "transit -oriented" residential develo went Comment noted POST -VISIONING MEETING COMMENTS (RECEIVED AFTER JANUARY 29, 2015) Spokane Valley Public Camrnent Matrix I January 2g& 29 Public Visioning Meetings VNF 55353 1 3/23/2015 Spol4ale Valley Public Comment lvlatrix 1 January 28 & 29 Public Visioning Meetings VNF 59963 1 3123/2015 CP CHAPTER CP Go rS POLICIES COMMENTS STAN- RESPONSE 60. Track the public's input and "official" responses to each input item in a chart/spreadsheet format from beginning through the consultant/staff review, planning commission action, and council decision. And, of course, publish the chart as a final feedback to the public. Most of the work involved would be done anyway in the course of sorting, recording, and addressing the individual contributions. it might even facilitate the whole process, It would certainly add a level of credibility to the process. Comment noted 61. CHAPTER 3: TR.SNSPORTATIO Mission a minor arterial Indiana Extension splits our community in half with high volumes of traffic. Comment noted 62. TP -9.11 See Spokane Valley Bike Map. Mission is a straight proposed shared use path to the Trail — it does not weave to the CP development, Why isn't city's plan consistentwith the bike path on city map? Comment noted 63. CHAPTER 8: NATURAL ENVIRDNMENT NG -3 Certainly more conflicts than compatibility. Comment noted Spol4ale Valley Public Comment lvlatrix 1 January 28 & 29 Public Visioning Meetings VNF 59963 1 3123/2015 CP CHAPTER CP GOALS POLICIES COMMENTS STAFF RESPONSE 64. CHAPTER 8: iJATURAL ENVIRONMENT Concerns regarding tie open pits in the area that expose the aquifer: environmental, safety, and even economic concerns are obviouS. The other is that Spokane covered its open drinking water reservoirs decades ago. The problem is not limited to the borders of the Valley City and a full consideration of the situation should involve all the water districts and bodies politic in the region. that overlay/utilize the aquifer and its uvatershed together with state agencies that have oversight/regulatory jurisdiction. Some issues to be considered include: 1) Identification of risks/worst-case-scenarios, degrdations, remediations associated with open air water sources. 2) Whether the aquifer should be exposed in the first place and limitations on future extractive operations. 2) Whether the current procedures for, and the actual progress in, covering or reclaiming economically abandoned pits is adequate. 4) Verification/clarification of who bears the costs of coverrngjreclaiming and strengthening financial responsibility stony 5) Whether direct diversion ofaquifer water should becontinued or who=her above d •c t uoirs should be enristr ucted to provide an indirect/i;ola;ed/detensill ie source of community. water. 6) Costs. Comment noted 65. CHAPTER 9: PARKS, RECREATION AND THE ARTS Project interfered with current use of Mission roadway that dead ends into trail and put undue burden on community by permanently detouring traffic through couplet to return east to Flora. Na opportunity for public involvement of this park or our park system PRG -1 Comment noted Spokane Valley Pub Ire Lau -vent Matrix 1 January 28 & 29 Public visioning Meetings VNF 59963 1 3/23/2015 66. 67. 68. CHAPTER 9: PARKS, RECREATION ANJD THE ARTS PRP -2.5 The Centennial Trail -Spokane River is a natural resource — conceptual design offered by city. For project shows structures across roadway. Limitation of access built into design and had to be mitigated with more money to return bikes to Flora with a trail at the Bid stage. Comment noted PRG -3 . City staff acquired money that ignored community interest in Mission Trailhead-mitigation instructions by Council is considering meeting this identified need. Thank you Council. PRP -5.1 PRP -5.3 Comment noted . Public Works should have contacted State Parks as an adjacent property. Comment noted Spokane Valley PAUL CamrnentMatrix iJanuary28&29Public Vi5iuningmeetings 'IMF 59953 3/23/2015 COlv1MENT5 AND RESPONSES REPORT -BACK PUBLIC /MEETING — MARCH 4, 2015 ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY COMMENTS STAFF RESPONSE 69. I arra heartened to see the city emphasizing the importance of local, existing commercial and industrial areas as well as the need for increased economic opportunities. The City's recent ruining moratorium, however, is a step in the opposite direction and sends the unfortunate message that some interests are more special than others. Is this really how the plan process is supposed to work? Comment noted 70. Add: 71. ✓ Business commitment • Create a "startup friendly" atmosphere eed another grocery store in place of the old Safeway. Co nn rent noted Comment noted; amenities near housing is a theme of the update process and will be reviewed as part of the Housing Element 72. Put a Trader.oes where the Safeway closed on Argonne. Comment noted; amenities near housing is a theme of the update process anti wili be reviewed as part of the Housing Element Spokane Valley Public Comment Matrix I March 4 Report -Back Meeting VN F 59953 1 3/23/2015 COMMUNITY CHARACTER COMMENTS I love the idea cf more parks;; parks large and small within the neighborhoods to allow children to play and STAFF RESPONSE Comment noted; amenities near housing is a theme of the update process and will be reviewed 73. nelghhers to come together. At the same time, make them cost- effective to build, maintain, & keep updated as neighborhoods grow. If they are not cost-effective, they will not be updated & maintained as needed_ as part of the He using Element 74. Would like to see firm cash forValleyfest and arts. Comment natcc; sub„cstion is outside of scope of ComprchereiPlan update 7S. Assure parking spaces relative to the size of the park such as M€rabeau Park and a groaning Valley Fest public annual event held at Mirabeau Park and Centerpiece Regional Event Center. Comment noted 76. Lack of hard funds for Valley Fest and parking. Comment noted; suggestion is outside of six pe of Col-iprcheesive Plan update 77. If you want community character get those semi -trucks out of our neighborhoods. C4mn:ent noted Spokane Valley Public Comment Matrix I March 4 Report -Back Meeting VN F 59953 1 3/23/2015 Spokane Valley Public Comment Matrix [ March 4 Report -Back meeting 1/NF 599.83 1 3f23f21715 COM MUNITY CHARACTER COMMENTS STAFF RESPONSE 7& Protect the character and integrity of the neighborhood. Quit allowing down zoning in established neighborhoods. Comment Hated 79. More parking at Mirabeau Park. Don't turn back to river. More river vistas. Maintain greenbelt along river behind Best Buy. (Green it up) Community uses taking advantage of river view. E.g. Red Lion [Ripple), Comment noted 80, Walkable neighborhoods with destinations to walk to. Comment noted, amenities near housing is a theme of the update process and will be reviewed as part of the Housing Element Comment noted 81. Create a "north" side of the centennial trail from Plants Ferry Park to the Sullivan bridge to create a loop with the existing trail on the south side of the river. 82. Build a park On the old Painted Hals Gott Course. Comment noted 83. Create opportunity on city awned land for businesses additional recreational use an or near the Centennial Trail such as bike rental, kayak park and coffee stands. Comment noted; leverage community trails to improve community character is a theme of the update process and will he reviewed as part of the Land Use, Parks, Recreation, and the Arts, Bike and Pedestrian, and potentially other Elements 84. Offer more things to do in Spokane Valley for visitors and residents to visit and go to. Comment noted, desire to create special places in the community is a theme of the update process and will be reviewed as part of the Economic Development Element 85. Build a theatre of arts. Entertainment venues. Expand our down town maturity. Comment Hated; desire to create special places in the community is a theme of the update process and will be reviewed as part of the Economic QeveFoopment Elemer t 85. What is the status of Appleway Trail Trail? Comment noted 87. Emphasis on parks and open spaces is not being adopted in the south part of the Valley. We are in danger of losing the GoIF Course site to a high density development that will completely change the nature and feel of the current neighborhood. Comment noted 88, Semi -trucks should be kept in industrial areas not in the residential neighborhoods_ Too many blind spots. They are too big and they run at odd hours, Our children are M risk with them in the neighborhoods, Safety & children should be first. Comment noted Spokane Valley Public Comment Matrix [ March 4 Report -Back meeting 1/NF 599.83 1 3f23f21715 HOUSING COMMENTS STAFF RESPONSE YE • The infrastructure for roads k not adequate for Painted Hills to be developed es NAI Biack requests In the preliminary plat. Comments noted Spokane Valley Public Cornrne nt Matrix I March 4 Report -Back Meeting VNF 59963 1 3/23/2015 TRANSPORTATION COMMENTS STAFF RESPONSE 89. I need improvements in Valleyfest Parking areas during the crunch. Vets— have trouble with City, Comment nested 90. In making reads and sidewalks prettier," please consider costs & the costs to maintain, as it impacts future generations based on our decisions today. Roads and safety for bikes and pedestrians is the main focus, with cost-effectiveness in mind. Cornment noted 91, Transportation around proposed new developmentComments Safety an sidewalks—especially around schools. zones in regard to decreased traffic and new bar/tavern an Thorpe Road Clubhouse for Painted Hills proposed development. noted 92. Who is expected to pay for these railroad bridges? Comment noted S3. More parking at Mirabeau. Comment noted 94. At rancher change the west bound left turn signal at rancher acid Sprague to be triggered 1.)y bicycles_ Change the sensor in the asphait to be triggered by bikes or motorcycles_ Comment noted 95. 96. Whenever possible, can traffic flow be optimized for bike routes? This would include stop signs and signals to favor the bike route travel, Comment noted The Applewaytrail would connect the town east to the west and offer a sense of community. What is the status/timell ne/and funding? Comment Hated 97. Indiana/Pines; improve? Railroad crossirig; improve? When will bridge for railroads be built? Comment noted; freight mcbility is a theme of the update process and will be reviewed as part of the Transportation Element HOUSING COMMENTS STAFF RESPONSE YE • The infrastructure for roads k not adequate for Painted Hills to be developed es NAI Biack requests In the preliminary plat. Comments noted Spokane Valley Public Cornrne nt Matrix I March 4 Report -Back Meeting VNF 59963 1 3/23/2015 HOUSING COMMENTS STAFF RESPONSE • 10 acre park is not acceptable next to a bari every environment; • Flood plain, CARA and wildlife area are not in line With homes in the area; • This creates bottle -neck trar'f:c sit:;at:ons in Painted Hills; • Is a high wildfire areaaccordir3 to district # DNR; • New schools will create additional park rrg space. 99 - am interested it co -housing. NUr.y cern ri:nities aCrnF 5 the country have ce-ho using as an option. People awn independent space and share Space, iike craft areas, cooking, community gathering -- garden. This is different than a retirement home; it can have residents of all ages. 100. Comment noted, housing options is a thence of the update process and will be reviewed as part of the Housing Element Preservation of neighborhood character is rot being adhered to: • Development in the South of the Valley is not maintaining current neighborhood feel/character; • There are new high -OP nsity apartment hr Tidings behind Albertsons on 32nd and a proposed high-censity units/leve:opment on the Painted Hills Golf Course site; • The infrastructure is not in place to sustain these developments. Before any approval, theee should be a full amenity review on schooling and availability for approximately 1,000 additional students. A full fire safety review for emergency evacuation for Painted Hills must be done, as this is a real concern for current residents who lived here during Valley View fire. Comment noted; neighborhood preservation is a theme under Housing and will be reviewed in the Housing Element 101. Pee pie living in the Valley have Seen many changes aver the years — goad and bad. Multi -family and single- family areas should be separated. Single level versus multi-level is also a major item that should be a factor in allowing new development. Diversity is important, and I hope housing diversity is increased, but current neighborhoods should be considered. Density areas should be kept intact. Parks with newer amenities that are cost-effective to maintain would be great in order to bri rg c❑;rn rnunities together. Comment noted 102. Alarming amount of apartment complexes being built. Comment noted 103. • Develop housing along the Sprague/Appleway corridor to take advantage of puhlic transportation. • Consider mandatory inclusionary housing to ensure affordability. • Preserve manufactured home parks. Ccmment noted; housing affordability and more and better amenities are themes of the update process and will be reviewed as part of the Housing Element 104. I fear the impact of mufti -family housing upon existing neighborhoods. We must preserve the community and not force our town to fit the artificial idea of a modern urban sprawl. Let our community develop naturally with our particular character intact, not fitting the cookie -cutter image of what we see in other Comment noted; preservation of neighborhood character Is a theme of the update process and will be reviewed as part of the Housing Element Spokane Valley Public Comment Matrix I March 4 Reoor~`-Back Mee:inE VN; 599C3 l 3/23/2315 Spokane VaIley Public Comment Matrix 1 March 4 Report -Back Meeting VNF 59963 1 3/23/2015 HOUSING COMMENTS STAFF RESPONSE cities. 105. Slaw the growth of mufti -fancily housing. Itis taking over the City. Imperative schools and infrastructure. Comment noted 106, More housing options. Cc -housing. Comment noted; housing options is a theme of the update process and will be reviewed as part of the Housing Element Spokane VaIley Public Comment Matrix 1 March 4 Report -Back Meeting VNF 59963 1 3/23/2015 Existing Conditions Housing and Economic TrencIs September, 2016 Prepared for: City of Spokane Valley E ONorthwe t ECONOMICS • FINANCE • PLANNING The Seattle Tower 1218 Thi rd Aven ue Suite 1709 Seattle, WA 98101 206.388.0079 This page int,enticnally blank ECONarthv»est it Acknowledgments For over 40 years ECONorthwest has helped its clients make sound decisions based on rigorous economic, planning, and financial. analysis. For more information about ECONerrni.•. est: www.econw.com. ECONorthwest prol::,1-1A1 [111! 1-1. E:, [ [Pt'.,, City of Spol ine Valley. It received substantial assistant.: ITI',It o4°;i!Aancenotwitlhstanding, ECONorthwest isre21,1,1r-;1]N1.•iorthe content oi .11k rp1ort. For more information about this report; t•1or-,,arl Shook shoo k.r4cc 1w corn r Seattle 1 ovwar 12'18 Third Avc•luc SJI:e 1709 Sea -die. tib, d J This page intentionally blank ECCN¢rthwest TaU !Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 OVERVIEW 1.2 REPORT ORGANIZATION 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS SUNMMARY 1 1 2.1 POPULATION AND DEMOGRAPHIC'MEN DS 2 2.2 HOUSING TRENDS 3 2.3 ECONOMICTRENDS 3 2.4 LANE) BASE 3 Present Land Use 3 Present Land Capacity 4 2.5 DEVELOPMENT TRENDS O Residential Developn:cr,t 6 Camrinercial Development 6 Industrial Development 7 3 FOCUSED ANALYSES OF ZONING' ISSUES 8 3.1 MEDIUM DENSITY RES[DE'NTIAL LL', JINt; 8 Results 8 Policy Considerations 9 3.2 MIXED USE ZONING 10 Results 10 Pc [icy Considera'tans 11 3.3 OFFICE ZONING 12 Results 12 Policy Considerations 14 3.4 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONING 15 ReSu lts 15 Policy Considerations 15 4 TECHNICAL APPENDIX 4.1 POPULATION AND DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS 18 4.1.1 Population Growth 18 4.1.2 Demographics 19 4.1.3 Educational Attainment 20 4.1.4 Income 21 4.2 HOUSING TRENDS 22 4.21 Housing Tenure 22 4.2.2 Household Size 22 42.3 Households with Children 23 4.2.4 Housing Affordability 23 4.3 ECONOMIC TRENDS 25 4.3.1 Gross Domestic Product 25 4.3.2 Employment 25 4.3.3 Taxable Retail Sales 27 4.3,4 Commute Patterns 28 4.4 LAND EASE 29 4.4.1 Present Land Use 29 ECO' or.hwest L' 4,4.2 Residential Land Quantity 30 4.4.3 Commercial arid Industrial Land Quantity 31 4,5 DEVELOPMENT THIENLS 32 4.5.1 Residential Development 32 4.5.2 Commercial and Industrial Development 36 Office 36 Retail 39 Industrial 41 4.6 PRO FORMA ANALY5115 SUMMARY 43 Apartment in MF -1 Zone -13 Mixed Use in _hU Ct.1Ll Zane 4,-. ECONorthwest 1 Introduction 1.1 The City tr.,t at updating its Coinpreheilsive Plan in accordance with the Growth Mana eiiirnen L:Llp Ler 36.70A RCW. Thc Comprehensive Plan i lii c.t-it\i's official for Future grov,:th rid development. With thkup..iate, the City i reviewein. (..,Amprehenive Finn mid development reoltlti[iiei the plat and regal curtipti,' ii..(1.1ininients and to rnakc any cr:tli:ir pc cv charges the City determim: 171ti.:L.'6+Al IC) help sha;:rt• in the ensuing ''i pliiiii iiig horizon. The City began the Ir & Ir1L j Cniepitd-A-nsive FL.i ir November, 2014. To (late, the City Ii rtipleiod A siih.sirtieti.til portion of tr'rr... pi:171k- eng.,7geIrrioniirit irid has also received Lind aetrilryx.c..i.1 vitAH1R.• webiraft .11-H the City's t.urisultarit hay-. compleit.ct it t, pcI.vralicia resulkd 111 L-L;:ri irt:id ::in to rebtri-A vi,:rcifikr goals and policios in order to ii I.11 - `Nis r:,•liorir provides. hiic,-174Tro_ind. Arid crelina Mary analysis Lite hake 011 y;:•."•,`H i I 1,,,:1;111, Of Hp.E'iw • TI1V: NCTOrk V.111] 11121p the Clay iiiii better how tlae City's IT has perfrirmed aim.] iL1 perform. It will also hc kv.rivs that the City Can hanging iirb (1ornprettensive Plan — nncl 11-1conorr11iL 1.1revcItTrrient, Lise Flements, specifically —to best.iide City's grov.itli oycir He r 20 VI i With `,.11(' GNI:\ and. the City's policy i.71 -t4. The Report provickf•-• :!..1.1,11,:;!lot of the City's ciirrient lane uses, clemog,raph ics and zon describes developnic-1it. trends frit -m.1 the I ras t years. Tlic P.I.00 includes core detailed a naly:-...s of specific iues and tiro:11:7:s iclentific-d h.; this nalysk.. public coriumt'illis.. or staff input, rhal. additional an,t1i.,,-.5-is (7..xiilori.s 'the impact.Li Iii, land use pnlicies tind 70ning have. on Hie identified 10.11-,e7t. Report also identifies potentiawsulatory and pnlicy opticri,-; thai. t1-1 Ctiry Lri :ortsider ii :Iti..71.1i.Niatc. prot-c,.is a.ddresyr, I lowever, it is L.-pportant to note thai any piril lawstions in this documorii re preliminary. Any changes the Ci makes to its Comprehensive Ilan and. developinent regulations will be into:irined by additional data and information that sill!. being gathered through the update process, including the ]irid Li pacity analysis. 1.2 Report Organization The remnincI(-1- r th:- i.iiiirnized into ihr 'ctions1 including a technical appendix. ■ Existing Conditions Summary: This section summarizes the key findings of the existing conditions analysis- MONorowest I Portland 1 Seattle 1 E1)gene 1 Boise 1 econw.com • Focused Analysis of Zoning Issues: This section assesses four issues that have been identified in existing conditions and thr: tr;. Ih. public comment to better explore how the City's existing y..oning is performing where trends suggest insufficient development of uses anticipated by that zoning diArict. • Technical Appendix: This appendix provides more detailed findings of existing demographic, economic, land use and development conditions and trends. 2 Existing Conditions Surrnmary This section provides a summary of the existing conditions by topic. Ii c;;ttiblishts a baseline and common i..::�,.erstanding of the conditions and trends affecting housing needs and economic growth in Sia: on! sle Valley hy summa ,:zirig the most current data an Spokane Valley demOti,rrip]114': , i1()a -. a ', :4'1�wFh, ecoi':cln7ic growth, current land use, and real estate developn 1 IL l .,iterii :. Wien' Doss] blc' and a vAi'a•ble, we sought to identify trends from that inforrnarit;n h i I t,!r ,ears of data. Ad to provide context, we have compared data and rc•nLl - from Spokane Valley to dint or5p❑kine County, more generally. The sections that follow provide a summary of key findings. More detailed information is included in the technical appendix of this report. 2.1 Popu tion and Demographic Trends Spokane Valley has a similar demographic composition as Spokane County overall- The papulation will continue to grow in size and it is anticipated that the population will continue to "age," meaning that the percentage of the overall population that is over 65 years of age will continue to increase. • Spokane Valley has realized modest but steady population growth since it incorporated in 2003, growing at a rate of about one percent per year. • Generally, the City Is similar in demographic and household composition to Spokane County. • Howesvon Spokane Valley currently has _t ht ;I7cr percentage, of rersons over thea ,e of 65 ec anparc'4i to die t nu.:i-tin (14 pc iron t to 1.3 percent; n o has _i slightly older ,median a e khan ti,c. County, at 39.8 years old (Spokane County median age is 37.2 years old). • 21 pe'; cni +,i .I F1: i'i. Valley residents have a bachelor's degree or higher, compared to hpok ne C::rur.tti;. • 5p:,i., ].t•. `'•':i1.ey's median lhni H.-i.c i~I ire erne of nearly $48,000 is lower than the median 1110,:ne of the nolo, which is approximately $49,200. ECONarthwest Existing Conditions: Edon orn ic arld Housing Trends 2 2.2 Housing Trends Based on housing data from OPM and C1c°i;7i. -:.' F:'}i,: d i., indicate decreasing demand for Irlrge: single-:�1v ii!�, Spokane Valley is multi -family 1ti1'.ising and hou5 'r!ult.l childr n iritis clticre-r sed over Jinc.. 'lolil. Cehsus, recent trends 4. "•. 1,1%or •r share of housing built in r.l' :Ind Imo 'her of households with. • Like 1t517C7p.4alat:cill''?F`C}Vdt't'1, �+_ C1l;c.:11' 3+:'.:i1,i",' .:- h(11isi1.-.' _?l'C74'4 tl') lla hi i ii 1 LIL [. but stead .mitt'. it 1;1'_01 porated in 21::'..::a. '.'i'(7b.-11i _ L a rate o: just. ove:' 011;2 percent perye,ar. • Spokane \' ille.v , la.c}i.i ::'ig characte I� I ii <1r c,fiJnL,i:7g: More rnul' -F inii1 -11,5x1 5ingle- fari7ily units zrc' l -i n built, the share oil •-onhers iti inc:reLtsin , averagL' lu}r:sehold size is d creasin . o7i1:1 r11;' -,h.r^Wilt of huuseholc., L•rith cliliLiren is dec-easing. • is an it;p-dig•; E* FCrs:; or all Spokane V,11.,;: 17ti,I,;s'-liold.:. :r4' corisicic-rud cost -burdened, 1 'I.i,l 1:, rs tc . rn defined 1.-3v:17 L _-. k•1,:, ';:sR'1 cl ni 1t i+1':;11-;_; and Urban, Development (HUD) .;. "Families who ply rnorp t`1:711 ;f l,, sa : ;1' .`i Cwir income for housing." • The majority of renters in Spokane Palle, are east -burdened 02 2.3 Economic Trends The regional economy is increasingly a service -based economy providing commercial, professional, and retail services. The region and Spokane Valley has been slow to recover from the recession starting in 2008. • Service industries have accounted For most of the region's gross domestic product and job growth since 2001. • The Spokane Valley employment and taxable retail sales have been slow to recover from the 2008 recession. • The Regional Commercial and Corridor Mixed Use zones account for the largest share of retail sales in the city. These zones also realized the largest decrease in sales during the recession, 24 Land Base Present Land Use fused upon the GIS analysis of the County Assessor's present use designation, much of the City's land is used for just a fc4v different uses, particularly single-family residential and general commercial uses, while industrial uses represent a fir smaller portion of the City's land base as shown in Exhibit 1 below. ECDNarthwest Existing Conditions: Economic and Housing Tren ds 3 Exhibit 1. Land Use by Acreage Land Use Category Acres F}4;cent Single-family General Commertial Va,i]nt Land Industrraf Multi -fa rrihy Exempt/Utilities Total 1l:,021. L9,7% 2,657 18.2% 14.8 1..306 .2r ..123 5. L••'rS 5.2% 70,1.4.] 100.0% source; Spokane County Assessor Residential Lands • Half of the City's land base is used for single-family housing, which is indicative of a suburban community. • Multi -family housing accounl, Enr .''.f, i ' rcent of the City's land base with 1,123 acres. Commercial Lands General commercial prop :l i, :; , t rll l !.^^ the second largest share of land uses with 13 percent of land area. Industrial Lands • There are 1,306 indu°-':ri21 lands, accounting for approximately 6.5 percent of ail land uses in the City°. Present Land Capacity Under the City's current zoning, rnuch of f11.= 1.., ,._,' for f:.lttire ?_ tt S (R-3 and R-4 for residential and 1-1 and 1:1 j!r 4,•iun l e[I,li 1I1±i ,rlll[I`_'1:_ci land) is Exhibit and Ex1bi 3. Th Exhibit 3. The {:a}x.:c:it} or i:`I. rl:l:iied Lig,• iclenti i, Ir: partialll,F-used, and Landeruti1i; cd lard that u..n him IDt'rai`Iirig the land that is i.ln..levelol,}.able (cid It' r c. 114 eny'.r( [lion Lally arnica dt C:ICiit:{7'1 for public ptrrpi.>st4, or Slt: r;'Vis.c' L;r':,'Jlttlble fur i''.'i1u17u lt'!. To dctl::'I'r.i im totaI h (Ins Ing u.ntt and :7optl1a'.ion c1 .lf iI . of t.i housing unit density and 11i3i -it.1-,rld sir..: is ialrlltapl etl 1,,: iii,• ,tl'.1[!!Ir t r: ] iiI l h~I,: Lind Iri 1,1ili re,3:ctentia1l zoning catCgouy. ECCNorthwest ExistingCon€titIans: Economic and Housing Trends Residential Lands Exhibit 2, Residential Land Capacity Net Share of Buildable Unit Population Population Zone Acres Cnp.icity Capacity Capacity R-3 653 :3,787 9,468 47.4% R-4 151 1107 2,751 13.8% MF -2 51 :1..1."2,1 2,2"7 11.3% MF -1. 87 Di.=! " 7 '_1..C.'; MUC 165 -,C017 1.,'525 7.6 %,' R-2 101 40 1,C05 1/2 _i7`•a CMU 74 651 976 4.?% R-1 15 =' 9 1V-1:..;", .I ocal 1,207 9,076 19,9s,I1 1.00,0% S.: V;.i: • [_ Y.r' . Ili I',' 11'x'` (..LI''' i'.,.I'-. Lhe r+ ;iltltlltl it icll.Li t,il1L3LYty 10 accommodate over 19,98D Tk: 2037. • l'. i I, I I: r n it i ly r..: rc:s (MF -1 and MF -2) account for nearly 21 percent of residential land capacity. Commercial Lands Exhibit 3. Buildable Commercial and Industrial Land Net Net Underutilized Net Buildable Acres Acres Zone Vacant Acres Share 1-2379 1-1 201 MUC 105 RC 44 CMU 37 C 28 0 25 GO 9 NC 3 Total 831 206 65 4 52 47 29 7 5 2 419 5$7 45.79% 266 21.3 4 109 d.7% 96 7.7% 84 6.7% 57 45% 32 2.5% 14 1.2% 5 0.4% 1,2617 100.0% Source: City of Spokane VaIley • Most of the commercial areas in Spokane Valley are located along transportation corridors, apart from residential areas. Spokane Valley currently lacks small-scale, neighborhood -oriented commercial areas within walking distance to many of the residential areas in the City. ECCNorthwest Existing Conditions ECO ncan lc and Housing Trends Industrial Lands • The 1,1-.:.;‘,s.I ) 7,urcvn! lk I L-153 acres) of the City's commercial and industrial land capi.ciiy is in twt iiiclustrial zones, I-1 (266 acres) and 1-2 (567 acres). • Spokane Valley has 580 acres of vacant industrial land in the 1-1 and L2 zones, of which the I-2 zone accounts for 379 acres 2.5 Development Trends Spokane Valley has realized a marked chang{:?.Lii developrr.ent ..100. Residential developrnent ha.s been the most coit4Istent cfLnr 1 Ile CiLv increasingly realized more multi -family hotts-toclevelopilyiti, ck-lai.e....'er'.7.ed by new apartment cornple.e.es lau_.-erinsize. til aparin-wat Int. same time, Sp 'ii cornotcrcial and ridustre.,..! I 2008, w4-iich indicates11iiii :1 1.:k d.ro\yr.11 i,y..,•Iierating a need or more space. Of the commercial grov,-.K i that i:1-(1 1;-)Fi.-11 iL Iu Lwri. iirtilirtd or Tierth. of 1nterstate-90. More detailed trends by use arc outlined bclow and ii 11,ippendix. Residential Development ▪ Multi -family housing has increased ab. a .sI1:L 11 Lui. 1I 1' :Jill over time, iird has been strong since 2008 as vacant.y !ow perci!ril iii7C.11'7;. Typically, ri vacancy rate of 5 :>,.2.[.t.~i'r t k; •L.ti roirmal, and a tL J 1)._.1c.ct1 indicates new units may need to bE. ii i Ii L 1.1, -.,LA demand. • The MUC an d CMzone.F4 have ex perien ced the rnatority of multi -family housing development w'niiie M1°-1 Hi since 2012. • Sin1e-fnrrii!y h st1.1 co.er,111 h011cillg type, but multi -fan ii!ri I itn a pc, • ILE- ;V C of recent nous.; ig development indicating the denlan.d .i. housing types in Spokane Valley is changing. Redevelopment has been ,;low throLiiLLL 1 Ci y, partienlarly in the Corridor Mixed Use (CIVIL)) zone along Sp 1.11P A 11]..A1 11,-ks not ri.,..:):1:zE,(1 oriv Flew multi -family development over four years. Commercial Development • Retail sales in Spokane V.1! rpi.:(p.-..r in, )11 1 Ilt• in the City's larg-e.st safe, L1\ rroducin:.; ;11J CMU). • 1")•reb..% mei ;in, sp. i:e, wThIi I v,Li...!ricy rate f.,ver 2 F&nL1l 01.11v blow 10 ilcrc.,-.17. 11.c:i.ifl indicAl ion that ;AIR' riy I4' Based on. pn oversupply oi 1..41Lce space. or., particularly ECONDrhwest Existing Conditions:: Economic and Housing Trends 5 ■ Retail vacancy rates in Spokane Valley decreased from over 10 percent in 2012 to about 6 percent presently, • Conditions have begun to i nlprr,y :, nye:- X17[' IA -.t ypdr 'r 1 rc`!.nii ` 77.ce 1 ; 1'71{-;!!“.•' has decreased and rents have inti Industrial Development • Spokane Valley has red Li�.Y.,:.,1o: ,ment since 200B. • However vacancies have c rc a eel su'oSi)tnii:aily !mull S0 -(°I 20 percent to less than 10 percent today indicating +21,..k, ck r..and is ulilizirig 1lii!,:,c; space_ ■ As the economy continues to recover aric the on grows, rpt'+'4 uidu5trial or light industrial space may need to be developed to meet growing d�-rnand ECONorthwest Existing Conditions' Economic and Housing Trends 7 3 Focused Analysis of Zoning Issues Several of the existing conditions and trends illustrated above raise questions about the performance of existirtg policien and regulations that prompted further analysis: • Multi-frui iv zon...n7.; (,M1 nd I.] l2) account nearly 21 percent of residential land capacity in Elie V- 1 ;one hiL, c\:pprie 711.0CI little development in recent years. Are then. 1.,...!rrit.i.s development in this zone? • To diversify the pplv in SpOk,a ne Valley, are mixed use development projects feasible in the Corridk)r ..%,•;1›..cd Use • In recognition of high vacancy rates in office zones. are the -re barriers to development in the office zoning idesignation.-7.;c: Harden Unice and Oitice)? • Based on cornm,:.nis woughout the publ!,..- origa-,,ernent prices. it clearih IIfl!I11iI, Jesires „I—ill-scale retail uses in ni..l:.....1•11..11•1100L1,... I ihLrt-2 pcaenti..71 for small-scale retail uses in. the City, especially in the Neighborhood Commercial zone? To address these ws, we combination Of coveral il-ifferynt methods incluc'ing devcjol-n-A•T:. pro 1:!1.1.1-!;.-1 ono ,,Ysis of deve'ciptn...-ni projects, evaluation of and i iIvi 11 i rids and p,.u.,..Tot The surnimirizecl Ji• • i:i..ortant to note 1 I 1I1ly.i IS Of existing ZD11: on current demographic in :A, ;dorm subsoqueilt by Ile City Council in this update prece, 3.1 Medium !Density Residential Zoning The MF -1 zone has not realized much development since 2C12. Anecdol.illy, the City lias heard thal ru1i 1..uv1v pre*vhs are not feasibli, [his zone, Ovci- r.he same time the h: riiIL2,2d an average oI 1 It per \Ta1. ille same average is bPtni-e A..! recessiori in 21 hi:: .1 id .cites that the MF -1 -1;y 'Live for ncw re!,•Idetttia] development wt ; :n in its post -recession recovery. To assess whc71-ter there are issues will. 1 Iv NIF-1 zone thEit restrict deve:opmcnt 1isib.Li :y, LCUNoiLtwest evaliimed building perJ.rii p.iiLlI i 11 In the MF -1 zone to deternine now many projects. were proper or the /v1F-1 to other zones. The anitlysisIso conducted a pro or[n] analysis of a hypottci :1 p, r r 1 project based on thc e). -.1st ing regulations. Results The MF -1 zone has realized little i,'t Iti Iii mi I y development fz.itice 2012. The lar:,:;c,,,! :-•iiare permitted units (70%) were in mixed 11:-:e zone. Just one permit 101- 12 units was isylod in the MF -1 zone from 2012 to 2015, and the project applicant later submitted a CAR p p:ica tion requesting an increase in the density allowed on the site. ECONorthwest DA-di-Igo:notions:Economic and Housing Trends 5 lel' sense of the reasons for thy Ii •„4.1'-1 .one despite the increasjng cleci 1.1 of a Itypc)1.11efic,11 A .-.111-:-H-1,11 old cis5..titn;)(io.:15. C1M be 1.1......14....penchx, 111.....;icates ,;p.iiinitmt devpinp-nurt not 0Am:11...Iv feasible in the Mt. -1 rur-ent reLrpuhtion.,.; he cost excLecis. the • For a one-acrc lot. the hypothetical apariniunt projLr wciiilj i„vc 12 units zd 14 surfAce park::i spot.i. • trLr ccoun LE.% forth- lot. over 28 percent of the lot is e 12 per acre denHt..„.. Iiiii1. r.r( vonii!Lg full utilization of the site and li ii t ninci I Iii1'7 on the project. This y luiijl PIS() prevents any pou 11ILLI I niii11 .411-1ly elopment from reachir,,A 11-i /one's 60 percent lot hrnii. • Ba...cd oil Ow pro 'forma analysis, with current reni 10,...-c-11-; and density limits (12 acrt-.) in the .1\111,-1 zone, development cost:IuiiiL. land acquisition) wni 1 Id 110I 10 111_- 30 1)12 rccnt or more lower tlyin currunt ccsls for an ap.ictrn 1 .11:7, fea.ible in the MF -1 zone, in Exhibit 38 in tft- Ti•ch!iit .11 • To improve the financial 1.2as1i..-.../ far rew 11,,..v1Oprno ri development needs to ie abc i..1 1,1 thc! Luh ia -:Icy Considerations For an individual project's costs and t.., n levels in the near-term. As a result, t' b L112 dir !).il reducing costs. Options include: ▪ The City could consider rxp-Ali I L'1 LiflS of medium rh,11.it,,..)nuLling that are less expensive to construct, but tILAt allowed kV 111 I ! 1 M F-1 zones. Such housing typologies could be ill the Mr -1 because they are &riser than inle-Family dwelling units and provide a transition lower density and 11i, -her density zones. • The City could consider rezoning some areas currently zoned 1%.4F--1 to zoning designations that aliow higher density residential uses. • To support additional housing types, the City could consider adjustments to the rnin[rnum lot size, setbacks, lot width, and other development standards in the MF -1 zone. • The City could consider using the multi -family tax exemptions (MFTE) for medium density housing hypes (which may include affordable housing provisions). ECCiNnirthwest Existing Conditions: Econ0Mt end Ha..iSing Trends 3.2 Mixed Use Zoning The Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) 2orie i zed IkLIe new d.Ioprricii i any type), both along Sprague Avenue and TrnLA vellue_ 1 c, LIS he devel:Tnicnt :Aptc.ntial wiIi LI this zone, ECONcrthwest conducted a pro forn to analysis of a hypothetical ential tixid project on Sprague Avenue 1,-)a.:;4.d C;q1 tIt' L1\T1J _evri 1e.opment ii rein : ik‘,iysis compared land values throughout tilt' City. Ari LVit hig ht.‘r land value :Avothsitate hig.11: density development to offset the higlier devlopnwrit Results Overall, the ]ack of red+-,...1mon: •RI to prod k'COrk.,illiC:'.,..11Vre anticipated rents do not support more cc \ ic I i I 1::V+210.13)T,1 ";Ili11.11.1 .111 Hue with the zone regulations, specifically. • A.!: explained in tEit IiI.r 1 h /1.1„•,!1,1„1 e !kir!. IWO Sill ?I The project 1-1a,....."•?..2 dv.,•(..1.111ig uniL; 2 root ol Area, and tuck-unch:r, parking,. TI1-4, '0:01_1 Id hove bi total. • Due to lho fc,IP rn:•o,:il use development, F.xi-..yaL.ki. rL1iIl n1.II hivi to Increase 25 pcivcr: or more for feasible, as shown in 1. ri H- r I Appendix. • Property Trent Avenue are lower than alonp, Avon H., or oticr corridors_ Lower land vd.tio is likely di prDximity inc.luArial uses, proxiIIIIIT t he railroad track., -11-1%1 El 11-7 transportation rc.ute:',„ such as Into.:.Thilo a result, retlevolori.rwi H L.:A as competitive here relative to otller loca'.ions in the City due to the less -di.. -;i1.,.11-6., ECONorthwest Exiting conditions: Economic and l-ousing Trends 10 Exhibit 4. Assessed Land Value per Square Foot 1�7 i I I .voa ci Assessed Land Value/SF 52.00 52.47 -;4.40 54.01 18.00 $0.da • sacra $8A4 Source: City of Spokdr+e Valley Spokane County Spokane Valley o 2 ml r r+ I I Policy Considerations • Targeted incentives; such as a Multi -Family Tax Exemption for housing, may help new developments reach project feasibility. ▪ The City could consider reducing parking requirements, including for carnrriercial uses. Lower parking requirements for residential and commercial uses could provide more flexibility in site development and reduce construction costs, potentially increasing project feasibility. • The City could consider focusing mix -used zones in areas and corridors where multi- family development is more feasible and served by transit. • The City could consider reducing setback standards or reducing open space rr'{1;,i:hien -. 11, .he mixed-use zones to allow property owners greater ability to develop Inrir ;;r�,l�c Lv. ECGNarthv:cst Existing Conditions: Economic and Housing Trends 11 3.3 Office Zoning Recent office development in the City has c1L,stc t 1 t,"callllc'I II'l r:•l,tiL: °+1;, �L, ::itlr' (II 1.4., L; zoning districts Specifically clesic',]ir_'tI to supi:orl ,,shit"c' {rl?C1':l:l?',,. 111i, `.i :.rc,'1:', li"I '.vlli:'l'. office dez:{>:oprl5{ nt has occurn,1 I1 lL'' good partici r'ly in tllc £ IL I(, of the l two ()dulled toiry..:ri (1iiice do ', elapl- nt lack tht. t' .ILLI it>.Itr Speciti( the Garden Office (CO) ilial C)ffiL:,„ (0) /:4111{':5 L'; Licerltrated along major no, -11--Li , t ill-rid:ors (Argonne, Iin,,:s anC and much n.eNr oft i40 c:c-v' koprnent ';Ince 2004. Curt r'I,My. a mikLi.tn. t`I '.1:;1'5, i:iciuCI:ii retail ai...' `..1r;;1: i ,flil5 domes. The Zone is n Iso cf. lr,Ic crizecl ' 1 :'l l 111', �`.',,. :Han 0.75 it hard to assomhielmcl office de':: l apmc':its. ECONorth'west conducted additional an�+alysis to tty to icer] f;, p titr'r.l-h:l :ai.l:ses of the lack of dffl C' cll'.k l._'[apriiCrir in ilii (1 t14'i• 'R"{711 L'.:a_ Spec11:.:..,;I _4, v' t7:lit}-:!t'd rot. L.1` :aI icC' •.]i:"k':.' S1,.}Cil{ 'l l:, 19! Spokane Valley to asst.!.; -, void' ti land is sii: ab:c or de„ . .. i! tiw+Crce doh) a! ;�sssed development. tl4..li1t, 1+.`t Iltilll'I'll"li;". t$ ..i:r�::la In these ZC. if they could acconulit.,.l iia i°..& Is Iat' t)= trt.i{ Id:, 1C,11i7.cd recent' -v. Results Currently, ll-.er{. i,, Ir'','; Space cycr 2>!) F't'r{ cr.t L small amt Lint of of'i(1. ten years has occurt.11 the map beio w'. Ll+: rrl,lr•d for 0FFicc ' -:LOC n:; indicated by a current vacancy rate for office .:iJ iliac the Cil (i.e. space leased less space vacated) only a over the 1m' t couple years. Most new office space built in the last and/or in the Mixed Use Center zone, as can be seen in ECONarthwest Existing Conditions: EconomiC and Housing Trends 12 Exhibit 5. Office Development in Spokane Valley • 0 Source-: Ce5Car P•1iilwaod, • 4 Office Development Rentable Building Area <10,00C 10,000-25,000 25,000.50,000 50.0o0- 100,000 >100,000 Bun!. before 2004 Buill betwreer. 2004 and 201z, LiP]w:•':y r i<C_ The absorption (space leased less space vacated) of office space since the recession has been negative, indicating more vacancies thart before the recession. last two bears the City has absorbed less than 10,000 square feet of office space a +i:ar i'Ii, xyrragk.. ■ A tyl,;r ..I tThi,.I I ,>i 'ic c` built since 00,1 had at least 20,000 building square feet ;.1.1&.ice that this tl;rr'tihold of building and parking space reflects rr: 1-iLlcr.rli. r. ; for develops c°:i it l rrriects, this translates to need/riga development r 4 :; r)A.:td 35,tIO10 square feet or :1;< we to accommodate a new office developmer,l ,), r_ • The Office (01,,ad Garden Office (( ;0) zones only have a few well si it .i ,i l ; 1:5,ri;'n square or InrAvr- rmir could support simil s. 1-10.w office de.), '100ents. The map below shell... !-, F:F:driii,11 cr!iice developrnc'.;t silc:'. in ilii.` C.).imd. C4 ) :.(`i' - 11:ii developed for tlrl'; Ly!:' srndLl office building b.:tied on size +'",rl {l: ':,.'I )pment sit l l Ii.E i.Ither Vacant or reds,,,,Acipabi:']- Vacant and redevelopable parcels ale in green, Dark ECONvrthwe-st Existing Conditions: Edcxromic and Housing Trends 13 acre or larger (good development potential) and the lighter green are half an acre to one acre in size tscin-lo votential). Exhibit 6. Developable 0 and GO Zoned Sites 3pulciria Mite Slte Pete riti& 5God Potential Zoeiftg Type 4 Si GO p3kan V:111 ceii t 2nI Policy Considerations • The N4UC and other area [0 Lcr,qa rE-911II11111, V be he Vier suiId future office development when thf-7 71;1 r [ i nip roves. Ti nro.isIivc good rrIilon access and development sites large enough Lo suppo7t sizo b Le office • Medical offico 1.1SL!ii may be a use likely 4) ;Al.! more demand due to the areas 4.ing populallon ii.d iI A 11.01:1abie Care P.C7'S iphaSiS on outpatient care. Due to sm.,.11 Ant] distance 1,.01/1 Interstate -90 most of '1.1.e existing vacant lancl in the OCrice and ( ;rifiler. Office zories aro unAkcly t bL deSirablc to: 7ieW office development, laked on sites used for past off'ico cluyelopmeit preieei. • Vacant areas in the 0 and GO 7nrip (r!specia Fly [ho.so .1:.c,F1!-; lon,,z, major corridors with good Ira nsit servtce) are suitable for uses for which there is demand., such as additional. multi -family housing. ECONorthwest Existing Cinntiition$! Economic and Housing Trends 14 Accordingly; Llle City could coAsider policy or regulatory changes that would provide opportunity for dr.velf}p,',6i'.,t i .'tilt', types of U 5 fo' 'e','lrl�'� there is higher d ntand,. li resident Loki Id. be in r't-p: i•.:m of _i it:i:iotial p'rinit eduses in tilrese office !{lrii or rezones, where appropriate, to opr.rl uta more development options. ,4 Neighborhood Commercial Zoning Spokane Valley lacks small-scale, neighborhood -oriented comm a rc i to l ci i-C'ia s within •� ea l k i rtg distance to many of the residentio! areas :n tl,.c City. Based on coninieritk received throughout the public engagement process, it is t'.r':tl 11111 =110 c;ataltlllltaity desin'- more small -scaly rch=.il uStS in neighborhoods. Additionally, small and local busirac sa:5 can hull) to achieve a vi..Drant retail market, especially with increasing competition from online options, warehouse retail stores, and established regional shopping centers. To assess what oppur;11 Ilities exist for adding new retail uses in residential ;lrt'.i:• (either stand- alone retail tl; t t: p,:,•, its or as part of a mixed ',se the number of vacant or I-'.,rrtally-vacar.l rce15 for !:::11 .k,..i,. retail uses at-nriior ilii...'rsections in residentia'. ar';1 : rir:d t'k:Flilzit!'d the f !c'i ht-.)orhood r. ;}Iti ait•rci,a! Tile analysis also references (I',i` j`.11kd`i`, „Ise prl: I(. rLiltl ,'stir -Inti ill {" ] i1 l l •1 Illi'' :'1' ;l''l:'i't` �C�I 1:11';;`;1 t se redevelopment. Results Based on the pa' -cc'] analysis,. nl,Frsrtulaiaes fad: aa.all-sc ;r', nc•4:,hborhood-oric>nted cs:==till[°r ial are fairly limited, • There are only two to three vacant or buildable sites of major intersections in rebidcntial areas that are large enough to srlpport even a small-scaak: • The residential use-:= surrounding thcsc sites are charocl;..r'rr•.:i housing. While further ar1Gi1ysis Mily be n.ec€a: lr� to euniirr', we 1'11'. t' -,'a1 torsi'-c°rti L]tat the low density development pattern may lirni: market demand for tl;t.:se neighborhood scale uses. ■ However, the horiThui of home in residential areas of the City away represe:lt 111, r.t den -I. -lid 1i r s:ii 0:I die coni,-.i•;c::ial spaces nearby. ■ As discussed above° and in the apps r=.11 . 'llrh pro l+li ad'w:j vertical mixed use. redevelopment is poi ic':i:.i`.lc in ;1te near -turn, Policy Considerations • The City could consider ensuring that the few 11 till ;i I ": rr :'..!W retail uses are appropriately zoned to allow neighborhood co ,i;:•., : 4i,al • yes. ECONirthwest Existing Conditions: Economic and l -'using Treads 15 ■ The City could (,r. .i i 1 ,11'i l policies and zoning in appropriate commercial corridors (or adj :allo commercial uses in close proximity to exis;i,+:.; rfc•si.+.ential rieigliboncoods, • Long-term. the Cit' could L„• ":1w0. groundwork for new neighborhood nodes by allowing small, nei hi:aa 11oc i tic apt, rt tail ,And itiixed use buildiT7t 4 :it iiitljor intersections (or blocks), even if the i' ..irtWs arcs t:.l r -i-& i-t1v built Frith rcsiticnc°t' . Uvcr time, these residences may be c:onver fed tc, c care i.i rcial rr., s, i { t iT „ l{it citiori for more intense home businesses, or ot1 rwifie redevti aped for mixed .1 7,i'. projects. ■ Parking requirements are often a constraint for small retail businesses. The City may want to review its parking requirements to ensure they are not a barrier for new small- scale retail uses in those areas. ECCNorthwes ExistingContiitions: Econcrnac and HaaysingTrends 16 4 Technical Appendix The Technical Appendix provides detailed numbers and finding for the existing conditions analysis by each of the five sections: • Popnlati,an and Demogral-laic l'reilci : 1 his :tit -•[:tion local<sat pc11'11:alion and Lf�'teii g 1pi>i.c ll_lr;i4:.c.[i Li�'4 ul Spoi..•Iin comparison. to Sl?r;Lime. Co,iniy. • Housing Treurls: Thi: section look: :il in-ncis related to household characteristics of Spokane Valley in Comparison t•.>:a] i,I;:ain County. • Economic Trends: This ,-cticln looks ,lt ",-.iployment by sector, retail sales and commuting patterns in Sp,:!.;.1 • Land Base: This Section l rr•I•: - .11 Lyn _ r[ l n i usi_. it ;11, r: run: growth, • Development Trends: This i-ccii[h:l 1cok4 at Ho fedi isiate ma`l:el :'1.lncizlrrl n1tals for multi -family, office, retail, and industrial 17 -Cs in •-.;po1c i11L' rillc}r. Data Sources used i[1 the existing conditions analy is include: • Population and I)t'rrloi raphicTrends: USC•, el.titlw Bureau and the Washington Office of Financial'lanasTI:i iii • Housing Trends: C;`; C `[:iasis ];I rtY.:'..1 :.roi °h l',i .l in =t[51l (1ff1 •c of r+I`'l lnfia1 lNA:1 na ge men t • Economic Trefid. ,r i.irC:: l'. iif 1:A'i1rir :C'IC' 17c:1};"i::Llllcsll, �'�;;`:] illCStj`1: Lj!a-L[I* 1[ tr .wt'lt"l:[. .[il;i s,Ilt.';.. !l1' i!1 `;`'i'L.il'll` �. ;'•1.;". Land Base: City of Spokane Valley parcel data, land €luantiiy analysis, and permit data. Development Trends: Washington Office of Financial Management,. US Census Bureau, ar.d CoStar'. Pero Forma Analysis: Costar and RS h+ieans2. CaStarisanati.lnaleomn1LT.1.11 r_'dJ iI•'• I 2 RSivieans iS.0pr:,c L.: •, :.,at.+.i, it [' l:'.015 I .S T.0❑:n ECONorthwest 1 Portland I `- .sac 17 41 Population and Demographic Trends 4.1.1 Population Growth • In 2003, shortly after its incorporation, Spokal, Valley hada population of 82,985 people. • From 2003 to 201,, Spokane Valley grew ::i;htl Hp ok.,.[tc c_:oLw l.Ly, and Washington at 0,9 percent per year or 10.9 percent over li,>> i IL i a•_i ]} a I it reached a population of 92,050 people. ■ During this period, Spokane Valley accounted for 16.3 percent of total population growth in the Spokane County. Exhibit 7. Population growth. Spokane Valley, Spokane County, and Washington State, 2003-2014 Population Change 2003 to 20/4 Area 2003 2014Number Percent AAGR -,2,985 92,050 9,065 10.9%i 0,9% Spo';ane is:l':Ir l'..' ;. s;,.3'3;t 484,500 i11 '.3.0% 1.156 Wt]96,=..'.170 8:F1 •:..: -s -3.796 1.2% SiYuri :1^:a ;1 ; i;=) :.i I?If.:. ;,1 • LA t-1 �i'. a . f :1 '.:sr 1 I '^,, J1.01 i.!'rrt.:r' ECONorihwest Existing Conditions: Economic anc Mousing Trends 18 4.1.2 Demographics ■ Overall Spokane Valley and Spokane County have a very similar demographic composition, ■ In 2013, Spokane Vr3licy Ii;d n incdLa71 age 47f 39.8, which is slightly older population than Spokane County wish a r,priial, e of 37.2. In addition, 14 percent of Spokane Va11cy's popliLalli.)u is over age C-)5. ■ Both geographies are aging and had a higher proportion of individuals 65 years and older in 2013 as compared with 2005. Exhibit 8. Papulation distribution by age, Spokane Valley and Spokane County, 20051-2013 100°6 ■ 60% 59% 40% 20% 0% 149E 60% 6 1''n Wim• 61% ■ 65+ 24-64 110-19 2045 2413 2.005 2D13 Spokane Valley Spokane Cordy Source: US Census ACS 1 year gi.i rata: , 7'J 5 SD101 arc 200-;).2.c.—y_Tar e i l(: 1. ECONcrihwest i),15d rid°, Condi •:ini7s! Economic and Housing Trends 1,9 4.1.3 Educational Attainment Frorn 2005 to 2013, the percentage of individuals in Spokane Valley decreaAed by twO percentage points to 3 1 pert' i.1 ��I nil, .yI-Ials over age 25. • Both geographies saw a decrease in the proportion of the popu i;J1. )n .ti ttl. I.:::; than a high school degree over the period. • Overall, Spokane County has a greater rate of eclucAtional attainment in 20 °.i cis compared with5pokane Valley. Exhibit 9. Educational attainment of the population age 25 and older, Spokane Valley and Spokane County, 2005-2013 100% 8096 6D% 4D% - 20% 67% 71% 1 8496 2005 2013 2005 2013. Spokane Valley Spokane County • Bachelor's Degree or higher High School, Associate's Degree, or Some College w Less than a. High School Degree &Sime: US Census ACS 1 year estimates, 2005 Table 51501 antl ACS 5 yrear estimates, 2009.2013 Table 51901 ECONartl-ow:'st Existing Ccnditibns: Economic and Housing Trends 20 4.1.4 Income • Between 2005 and 2013, [median IhiIL: ;r•Il,,IhI in,. 11,11L. r t, by more than $14,0D0 ii Spokane Valley but it is st;:l belay ';l, I:; i ,pit,. ['r,,iitty median income. • Despite this positive houselp.ild.t:: ir„ the tar L,ck.4 (tlros,e making less than ` ...;.C1DQ) conshitr.l ,,i 7:: rl w c•_et -J Lird of 1-iidr is;cliuldk in Spokane Valley in 2013. ■ 59 percent of :t :,110 L ic Valley made less than $511,{]r) H 2:113 ns cnririnr.•cl 'with 51 perivni oI 7s},.t .c h ILlti LEI Spokane County. Exhibit 10. Median H:nusulto ld Income, Spokane Valley and Spokane County, 2005-2013 $50,000 1 $50,000 $40.000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 Spokane Valley $49,233 $41,667 Spokane County Spume: US Census ACS 1 year esti.nates. 2C05 Tabit 50101 and ACS 5 }ter estimates, 21309.2013 Table 5010:. Exhibit 11, Income distribution of households, Spokane Valley and Spokane County. 2005-201,3 Spokane CCu my Spoke ne Valley 2005 2013 2005 2013 MEM 21% 25% 26% 19% 12% ME 13% 36% 20% 31% 06 20% 40% 00% 9% Ell 5096 100 ■ Less than $25,0*0 $25.000 -S50,000 $50,000 - S75,000 $75.000 •5100,000 ▪ $100,0004 Et;4Norxhwe$t Existing 0or•ditions: Economic and Housing Trends 21 Source: U5 Census ACS 1 year estimates, 200 Table 819001 and ACS 5 year estimates, 2009-2C La Table CP03, 4.2 Housing Trends 4.2.1 Housing Tenure • Spokane Cuu i .'° .?ter and m.vricr ,;,ccL l,i. 1 h remained consistent with only a one pcii i=�,: [: iii i7iLroase over In i>othgeographies, renter- occ ;ped sli: fitly aver a tiu:%, of al Arousing units_ • Renter occupied housing units in. Spokane Valley increased by four percentage points from 2005 to 2013. Exhibit 12. Housing Tenure, Spokane Valley and Spokane County, 2005-2013 Spokane County tans 2013 2005 2013 35` 36% 34% • Renter Occupied Housing Owner Occupied Housing 0% 20% 40% 60% BO',G, 104% source: US Census ACS 1 year estimates, 2005 Table 825CO2 and ACS 5 year estimates, 2009-2013 Table 825003, 4.2.2 Household Size ▪ In 2013, the average household size of both geographies was sirnilar at just over 2,4 persons per household. • Average household size slightly decreased in Spokane Valley by 0.04 persons from 2005 to 2013. In the County average household size increased by 0.05 persons. Exhibit 13. Average Households Size, Spokane VkIiey and Spokane County, 2005-2013 Average Household Size Area 2005 2013 Spokane Valley 2,41 2.43 Spokane County 2.39 2.44 EC0Nk rthwes# Existing Conditions: Economic anc Housing Trends 22 Source; Census ACS 1 year estimates, 2065 Table 51101 end ACS 5 year estirnntm 2oce-2013 TableS11OL 4.2.3 Households with Children In 2013 approximately 31 percent of both geographies' households had children. .r The percent of households with children decreased in both Spokane Valley and Spokane County between 2005 and 2013, ■ rzi calk:iiLt, Valley saw a decrease of nearly five percerit.7gv poi„t fruttt 3171. .{ ll[ I,&°rc ; : rl: while Spokane County experienced a sinal df,c1 a,Is ' in Llla 111111 E1,0r' 1 iK , r r -. 1101d5 with children. Exiiilt,it 14, Percent of households with children, Spokane Valley and Spoki_we County, 2005-2013 0.0% 35.696 30.7% 2005 2013 Spokane Valley 3]..35 30,6% 2005 2013 Spokane County Source. LLS Census ACS 1 year estimates, 2005 Table 51101 n4 .nCS 5 year estimates. 2009-2O13Ta:1. 1)1- 4.2.4 Housing Affordability • For sale housing has become more affort.,,7117 cieciv:c.e in housing prices and mortgage rate; an index 1 ..,] ii .l i _, l _: ltc>> i :.ii ,. is more affordable. ECONor1J west Exi3ti1gCcnditions: Economicarid Musing Trends 23 Exhibit 15. Housing Affordability (Mortgage 225 200 175 150 t' 125 n 43 104 r 75 54 25 Payment to Median income) Index $250,000 $ZUU,pDO $150,000 $50,1706 0 Spokane County Statewide —Median Price Source: Rurrstad Center for Real ease, University+ of Washington $0 Mediar Price ■ Overall, 36 percent of all households in Spokane Valle} are cons.icicrra1 i1 both Spokane Valley and Spokane County the percentage of cost-:aiirid ['ti ed households with a mortgage increased the most between 2005 and 20113 compared to those renting. However, in both jurisdictions, over half of renters are cast burdened. The share of renters who were cost -burdened remained relatively consistent from 2.005 to 2013, and actually decreased in Spokane Valley. Exhlblt 16. Cost -burdened households by type, Spokane Valley and Spokane County, 2005-2013 Spokane V�Iley Spokane County 35% 2005 26% 35% 2013 35% 2005 22% 2013 32% 35% 34% 54% 52% 509 b 54% 096 20% 40% 64% Overall ■Gwnerswith mortgage Renters ECQNarthwest Existing Conditions: Economic and Housing trends 24 source: LIS Census AC51 year esti ma cos, 2005 Table B25100 and ACS 5 year estimates.. 20C'9-2013 Table E251(}0. 4.3 Economic Trends 4.3.1 Gross Domestic Product • The Spokane reg, on's economy has ste~aclfly grown with gross domestic product irw ,1° ir< at an ,le : I' 1:;1 ,: ui r1.11 :: t. .. i 2_75 in inflation adjusted dollars. • l_r7:w : Ali i of :,conopnc it service providing industries, as wt �rrl :t':i to r,„.0.'•1l1 ingoods-producing industries or government Exlliliit 11. Spokane ri1etroporitrii Statistical Area, Real Gross Domestic Product (2005$) Total GDP Per „x.:00 Capita $35,000 y r 530,000 Private strrvices- $25,000 {�r�,uiding indu :t.ri: s GDP per Cap iia $20,000 $15,000 f ri.v. t[: goods procuring $10,000 iricuStriuG $5.000{ - Gavcrrirrlent 11- rile Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis 4.3.2 Employment • Employment in Spokane County betwer~'n 2002 and 2014 reflects the broad economic trend of the past (I, trade: jol, 1, r., 4k, t l i:lc 'cased steadily until the financial crisis in 2009 and has slowly ber•I.II1 LL) • The County's job n11x has rc':1..iineed consis`.t n1 over the twelve-year period- • Sr`r!';'.cs., such. ,11- I°';1LLcat� }I'I, ti[.:alth care, and')bill, :,ricin 11 :i11`cchnical service,.. �'1':1�'�•,�. e tht' l;ii;. est share of 'r ie pm to t171s.•11 t ,16 percPrt r' t'llk` Ii i1. The sL r vicc st ci,)r also exp2i ll,;: ,h itL:.-;t gra'. il. Lit jest over tour percent. ECDNorti+west Existing Conditions: Economic and KausingTrends 25 Exhibit 18. Number of jobs by sector, Spokane County, 2002-2014 1 • .1 i••I lFt l. 1.1 .1111....1 mow 2i0oa 2074 202,5 2017$ RgQ7 2003 2149 2010 2011 70d2 :!GELS MIA • conota P • Nbnuh Xudr ✓ hYTU kumil SUMUS Source: Washington Emprayn lit 5mcirity Department, Quarterly Census of Employment and wages 2002-2014 Note: At the time tns chart. was made, fourth quarter estimates for 2014 were unavailable. Employment numbers for 2014 are the average of quarters 1"3. • There were 2544 home employment permits issued between 2008 to 2015 in Spokane Valley, averaging over 400 permits a year. • The number of these home employment permits still active is not known, however. Exhibit 19. Home Employment Permits. Spokane Valley, 2008-2015 Mi ll•o�ci Spokane valley ECONt rthwest Existing Conditions: Economic and Housing Tye nds 26 source:City+ of Spokane valley 4,3.3 Taxable Retail Sales ▪ Similar to job, taxable retail sales in Spokane Valley decreased during the r: f i':;' -ii, after a period of strong growth and are slowly beginning to grow again, bui °IiLaavC not returned to the 2007.peak, ▪ The recession's impact on taxable retail sales was significant with taxable retail sales in the region dropping by about $50D rnillion from 2007 to 2010. ■ Rc I,, 1 -c r'tt r c .'L Ic ;. .)nstituted pen on t of all taxable retail sales in 2013. Exhibit 20. Irlf Iiitioal-adjusted taxable retail sales In sector, Spokane Valley, 2004-2014 Taxable Retail Sales $2,000 51,500 51,000 $500 $0 —w 2004 i 1 2005 2005 2002 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Source: WasdiingtLan Daaertment‹if Revenue, Taxable Retail Selma, 2000.2014 111 Other Construction Services • Retail In 2013, t! L•.: Region::1 Com, -l: r4-i:ll ..t int., :tccounted for 40 percent of Spokane Valley's to[,!. 1xx:.:1'Ie retail :,:ales, i' . ;,r'r:doi- Mixed Use and Community Commercial zones aCi'�,.`hl:•ii,��; for 15 L,, -..cent of L1 .. int:hl. ■ In :' 907, Eh L. I . .iL,lIL:i ( L;mrni:•rL"I7.0ues LA.d for 43 percent of total TRS, and most or the h 21.1:17 -LL 2010 occurred in the Regional Commel'l I[il :(n u. ilr,,i 2d0 , ieL it Dales in tl'I L,`. l3:l iNetL :'.,.)0,...I1,a'•JC more than doubled. ECDNorthwest Existing Cenditions: Economic and Housing Trends 27 Exhibit 21. Inflation-adjusted taxable retell sales by zone, Spokane Valley, 2004-20.3 ,,,, $2,500 - 0 Woo j I Taxable RetaIISafes II1 11 «'a mfr 2004 2005 2006 2007 20175 21X79 20W 2011 2012 2013 ZD74 Source: Washington One amen t of Revenue, Taxable Rel. iI S€,Irk, 2D00 -2O14 4.3.4 Commute Patterns in MIX AoRGa ■Other C & CMJ A RC •1': 1 :i!'.e' :l:]".,t'! . i.. -is[ rrl lr.n,l I )r!: l+, I,: s'_�e with t11e 3Itnost $0 percent of 11',' °tl'(: tI f. it1' 01 Sr, ECONorthwest Exist iig Condition,,: +' '.,...iii. and Housing Trends 2B WHERE SPOKAI4L VALLEY REST*ENTS WORK Numhcr of Jobs yr iii{,:5 urban 4rowdrArea amid ary • Law 0 2 a It41�s Source: US Census On The Map Data, 2011. 4.4 Land Base 4.4.1 Present Land Use • Single-family housing constitutes the largest share of land use within Spokane Valley making up 50 percent of all L]:nd anu,i. ▪ General ccrrinzti r4 -il properties coinp«s42 the econd largest share of land uses with 18 percent of land area, • At almost 3,000 acres, vacant Valid is :hey third higliew° kind use category ilt the City.A sizable shore of this land is in inn. northeastern par,. of [hp City. • Public facilities and multi-tohaus in.g has the-:fn.xllest witii just five and six percent tf totaJ .t,rtd area, respi ciiveIy,. • 90 percent of all rR sidonti l'1 la:� l is o11(', 5ir7;;lc -f y and 10 percent is zoned multi- family. ECQNorthwest L i tin r, 1, :iilic;r s: Economic and Housing Trends 29 Exhibit 22. Present Land Use, Spokane Valley. 2015 I—J q,bn.• 11111 8114 .ri tT , 1�h• Lid `J J1 ■f ! • •, �' Land Use Nh or $engl a-lami Mul[d r, n,ilq Gencr:W. crmr,. rc,7 Inpus1rial Vac@rlLan: EANTINel,VIC C8 .1 --ti ,7P ' Luka . r ami Source: City of Spokane Valley GIS. Exhibit 23, Land Use Land Use Category 1 -r by Acreage, Spokane Valley, 201.5 Acres Percent Single-family General commercial Vacant Land Industrial Multi -family ExempltjUtilitles Total 10,021 3,667 2,979 1,'306 1,123 1,054 20,150 49,7% 18,230 14.8% 6.56 5.6%p 5.21SF 100.0% Sour: City pF Spokane Valley GIS. 4.4.2 Residential Land Quantity ■ Tinder current zoning, Spokane Valley has capacity for over 9,000 units and over 19,980 people based on density and household size • The largest share of the City's capacity is in the Residential 3 (R-3) of the residential land capacity. The R-4 zone has the second most additional housing asslin ipu ns. zone with 47 percent capacity. EC 1 North west. Existing Corditivns: Economic and HousingTrends 30 • The multi -family zones (MF -1 and MF -2) also have sizable share of the City's residential capacity. Exhibit 24. Residential Land Capacity Net Share of Partially Used Underutilized Buildable Unit Population Population Zone Parcels Vacant Acres Acres Acres Acres Capacity Capacity Capacity R-3 1.214 197 455 0 553 3,787 9,4€8 47.4% R-4 207 123 27 0 151 1,101 2.751 1.3.890 MF -2 140 26 25 0 51 1.129 2,257 1.1.395 MF -1 193 39 48 0 37 958 1,917 9.6' MUC 181 163 0 1 165 1,017 1,525 7.6% R-2 198 51 49 0 101 402 1.005 5.0795 OM 316 56 0 18 74 651 976 4.9% R-1 27 13 3 0 15 32 79 04% Total 2,476 669 608 20 1297 9,076 19,980 100.0% Source; City of Spokane Valley 4.4.3 Commercial and Industrial Land Quantity ▪ The City's industrial zones (I-1 and I-2.) have the most buildable acres of all commercial and industrial zones. • Vacant industrial land in the 1-1 and I-2 zones accounts for 46 percent (5S0 acres) of the City's commercial and industrial capacity. • The Mixed Use Center zone also has a sir.iHe .1rr1: i :!.t of. y; c oni ID15d toilEl 105 acres. Exhibit 25. Buildable Cornmerclal and Industrial Land Net Net Underutllized Net Buildable Zone Vacant Acres Acres Acres snare 1-2 379 208 581 46.9% 1-1 201 65 256 21.3:6 Iv= 105 4 109 8.7% RC 44 52 95 7.7% CMU 37 47 84 6.78 0 28 29 57 F: _5% ,M'� /'0 25 7 32 :.5`� GO 9 5 14 1.2% NC 3 2 5 0.4% Total 831 419 1,250 10+0.0% Source; City of Spokane Valley ECCNor.hw+est Exist ngConditions: EC❑nernin and Housing Trends 31 4.5 Development Tren 4.5.1 Residential Development ▪ Overall, the number of housi:,s uiriLS w `nokane Valley int-rc tr;a i.: r,i ,Rid ,y I rr,:r. 2;11:•1 2015 when it reached approxiatit c-ki. 40,600 I t,i'. lin: -. • However, -the mix of housing unik i„ shirtecl frn;i, ?.iiI,.i lo 2 i1 1; 1.;14,1.1( homes fell by half (four percent to two percent i I pori{,til; ,s, list :,ult i rr 1, iini increased slightly and single family homes stayed • Over the last 10 years a majority (60 percent) of new and nui]ti-family housing units have been multi -family (two or more) units. • In the lett FiVe years, 76 percent of new single-family and multi -family housing units have been multi -Family,. Exhibit 26. Total housing units by type, Spokane ValieN, 2004-2014 45,000 40,0001 35,000 _ .-.. ® llll �. Mobile Hames 30,000 I 11121- Units 25,COD 0 20, 000 15,cao 10,0 DO 5,0D0 4 LO lr' LCA "b ,SCS 1, 19 4 4' -P 5aures7Washington Wiener Fins nein! Mnra,ernent, Housing Units by Tyne with Annexations Added, 2004,2014 ▪ The housing stack in Spokane Valley is older with the majority of total housing units built before 1978.Only 14 percent of the City's total housing stock was built since 2000. • The majority of multi -family housing has been built since 1980. During this period it composed a larger share of total housing built accounting for 40 percent of new units. ECDNorthwesk Existing Conditions: EeOnarnic and Housing Trends 32 hxhibit 27. Housing Units by Type and Year Built, Spokane Valley, 2013 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 Lictile Homes 2+ Units 1151 Unit Built before Built 1960 to Built 1980 to Built 2000 or 1959 1979 1999 later Sauree: US Census ACS 5 year estimates, 2009-O13Tsble B25127 • Apartment rental rates (not adjusted for inflation) in Spokane Valley have grown steadily at 3S percent per year from 2004 to 2015. ▪ Stiirbng in 2009, Spokane Valley rental rates surpassed Spokane County and have remained siig itly. IiiFher ever since. • Vaca ni1 AL hive varied considerably, ranging between 4 and 13 percent during this pei i.,1. ▪ SI11w2 20! Ili-, ilLla1"1.",;L:11UCi Law of i'4' i i.rr:r E,}crcer1t_ • Vacancies increased in Spokane Valley in 2014 to over seven percent and rent increases slowed during this period. • Regionally, vacancy rates are still at a 1 -year low. ECONarthwest ExistingCorlditions: Economic and Housing Trends 33 Exhibit 28. Apartment Rents and Vacancy Rates, Spokane Va'icy, 2000-2015 Average Unit Rent $900 $ 800 $100 $600 ¢ $500yy� $400 $300 $200 $100 ,AmiSpokane Valley Rent --• Countywide Rent -Spokane VfalLey Vacancy -- -• Countywide Vacancy Y ti 4% 2% So 0Ur m ,,,,1,,,,,F,,,,, Source: Ca4tar ▪ ttltT' �a1T1111` c(voi: p[1lenL' ]I: Spokane. Cnuril ' Inaii {:orts 4[idlll}� �'llil bofore 2004, es ped.a 1..1y in the urban core of Sp1 k:in: and ` polca7rlr 'v' 111 Sr. ■ Newer mtillli-familybuiidings tend. to be over T51) units per corn piex and are concentrated on outskirts of Spokane and: Spokane Valley, ECONa rthwest xistI lgConditions: Economic and Housing Trends 34 Exhibit 29. Multi -family Development ir the Spokane Valley Area, 2014 pok ring 1 2 rni 1 1 1 Source: CoStar. Multi -family Development rIUMISer un[ia .c 25 2-75 76 - 150 151 -KO 301 - 517 guilt before 2004 Ruin. between 2(104 a no 2014 sI C}II NI:111(T Lili L' 1-ake ECONorthierest Existing Conditions: &orlon iu anti Housing TrencIS 35 4.5.2 Commercial and Industrial Development • Commercial and industrial development has not changed significantly from 2008 to 2015 in Spokane Valley. • Office space has experienced the greatest change, growing from 24 percent to 28 percent of total commercial space. Exhibit 30. Commercial 10,000, 000 9,0000,000 8,000,000 7,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 0 Source: CcStnr and Industrial Building Square Feet, Spokane Valley,. 2008-2015 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 • Office • industrial Retail Office • Vacancies in thc: City are rely tit°e1}r high, but have decreased from a high of 35 percent in 2C'09 to about 23 percent in 2015. • Office vacancy rates in the County were lower at just (,vei 1 i t rta.:nt. Vacancy rates below 10 percent indicate thai the existing supply is :'1Ii,i , L . :1 Vii i d and new supply may be needed. • Office rents in Spokane Valley and 'nu mt.,. dollars per square foot per year from 2008 to 20 k,':, yUi iJ ct•covuJ. ECONorthwest Existing Conditions: Fcorionnic and Housing Trends Exhibit 31. Spokane Valley Office Rents and Vacancy Rags. 2008-2015 $ 20.00 $ 9.8.00 $16,00 $14.00 11.1 $12.00 03X ✓ $8.0-0 4 $6.00 $4.0 $2.00 $0.00 Source: CoStar - SpokaneValley Rent -----Countywide Rent - Spokane Valley Vacancy ----Cauntwwide Vacancy 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 40.0% 35.0% - 30.0% - 25.4% 131 20.O% E 15.0% 10.0% - 5.f6 0.0% ■ Similar to 1h i, o;orii-y of office development in the area was built before 2001. • More recent off;.. -4' 4;v.vciopine t T1 s tende d o be over 0,tJ{lt1 square fl ['l and concentra led in &inv.'maim, cl F tiIM Yl'l{' '.`.`1 i'.1. Spok...111ong 111 t. -94 . ECONarthwest Existing Conditions: I conornic and Housing Trends 37 Exhibit 32. Office Development in the Spokane Valley Area, 2014 Office Development !Rentable SullellneArea c 10000 10,000- 25,000 25,000 -50.000 50,000 - 100,000 100,000 Built before 2004 S Built between 2004 and 2011 1 NI i I h r 1 Od • ti i Serilke'lyilli:e: 6" III • . ....,▪ .- • • 0 1 2 nni 1 1 Source: CoStar • 4 ar• lkikt! LIliay • L._ • EGONortftweSt Existing Conditions: Economic and Housing Trond5 38 Retail ■ Retail rents in Spokane Valley reached a high of $11 per square foot per year in 2010 before dropping below $8 per square foot in 21114_ • Rents in the County followed a similar trend though they were consistently $2 to 13 higher per square foot. ■ Retail vacancy rues peaked in 2012 and have decreased since. By 2015 the City's retail vacancy rale was about 6 percent, • As, vacancies have decreased, rental rates have begun Lo increase again in the 1Tot year. Exhibit 33. Spokane Valley Retail Rents and Vacancy Rates, 2008-2015 514.00 $12.00 _ r - $10.D0 co ▪ $8_00 $4.00 $2.00 $0.00 Source: CoStar Spokane Valley Rent ---"countywide Refit Sppkine Volley Vacancy --- Countwide VEcancy 2005 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 12.0% 10.0% $.0% 6.0% 4.O% 2.0% 0.0% Vacancy Rate • The majority of retail di . c1opinent is along major corridors, especially developments before 2004. ■ More rc•rr,„t cirvcilnl1r:u:r,t is generally more dispersed, but tends to be ccnicentrated along major roei[i. i_iel t: ,-der in scale. ECONertttwest ExtstingConditions; Ecer n,ir.and Housing Trends 39 Exhibit 34. Retalt Development in the Spokane Valley Area, 2014 7 2 Retail Development enahle Building Area < 10,040 10,000- 25,000 25..000 -50,000 Q,000 - 100,000 100.000 Bulit before 2004 • Built )Detween 2004 and 2014 ' • .• • ry • Lake 0 1 2 ml 1 Source; CoStar • • a • ECOIVorthwest Existing Concliticas: Economic and I -I &using i reridS 40 Industrial • Spokane Valley and Spokane CounI\ ,L I,i:;ir;.-:1 t :tts have hi. 200 and 2015. • Industrial vacancy rates in 2015 are less than halt of 'IL in. 2010. Spokane Courtty vacancy rates are tar lower ;it. 'Valley but are also far less volatile_ Exhibit 35. Spokane Valley Industrial Rents and Vacancy Rates, 2008-2015 $0.00 $5-00 it $4.00 LL $3.50 - re to $2.00 $1.00 $0.00 -. scurre: costar 613C40 De Valley Rent ---- Countywide Rent p-.$0okarie Valley Vacancy - -- -- Countwide Vacancy ------------- 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 25.0% 20.0° 9, 15,0% C 8 lad% % 5.0% • New ;i d..i Ir:;il, :-lr'vr•iopmen In the Spokane Vall& y area Spokane City and en Hu, n,rtcr • Only 60,00G square feet of ne ii mris11 ccs,. L L: Il a `,rik)L..,tni! ,'.,1Ley 2008. • However, from 2004 to 2008, much of the new industrial development in the region was in Spokane Valley as shown in the map below_ ECONorthwest Existing CanditiensT Economic and Housing Trends 41. Exhibit 36. Industrial Development in the Spokane Valley Area, 2014 Industrial! ©evelopment Hemmer ®utiedri A L { 16.440 10.044 25.004 25,000 - 50.000 50,400- 1oo.4,1)0 > 144,004 Built to-for4 2441 • 9ui1( between 2004 and 2914 0 1 2mi I I I SourCb: costa ECONcrthwest Existing ccnditiot s: onor Ii~ a rid Housing Trends 42 4.6 Pro Forma Analysis Summary The pro forma analysis provides an initial high-level financial fr ,si1,ilitti+ assessing, t of redeveloping properties m 5p k ,ne Valley. The analysis used 1 ,. ;.; i i 1-Irc, for ri),A ilri ."ysis tQ assess the financial feasibility A static pro forma , 01 4-r,ii!;l:ruclirrg a new building and the potential re^vl.Thery4 1-11e new vvocllC ,..'rir:r.1[r7 ir. iI - first year. The analysis .:ssumcs that Ole nlilriini; i, -: 1 ' ir, ill ,_ Ears and cornpar,:,4 tEic total Cost to construct ar ill, llo:t r.leic.I1 il' l.would .•a:l, lirr in the current market. L 11c°Aiu-mted c<:1l ''; price is high enough To cnvr r the r:ost cif cc:c.._i'_i6 i ilrn, the rlt'veloper'r- 15ro:o LL and buying tk property" the project is consideruci fe a This analysis analysis subtracts the cost of , (rn:t: r.rtirn and developer's profits from the c' .ti:l,;rleLl s:',lc price to determine how much a di 5.".`.6l:w w oulii be willing to pay for the prop', rt.,. li'4' 1-c : rciir-iI land value), It is assumed the developer would keep fin of the sales price as profit. Apartment in MF -1 Zone Building Program ▪ The analysis assumed a hypothetical one acre parcel zoned. MF -l. • Based on the zoning code, a developer could build 12 units (eight one -bedroom units and Four two-bedroom units) on the parcel- • Parking requirements dictate a minimum of 14 parking spaces, which was assumed to be all surface parking. Financial Assumptions • Total cost of the project (excluding the cost of purchasing the property) would be $1.49 million, $13665 on a per square foot basis- • Ti' .,,, ,9 t sir= ::; ;rl :77..d a one-holi mom unit rents for about $800 per month and a two- bedroom L1r1,t :! :1t'i 101 ilrclil ' i,14 -[f per month. ■ Assuming a 7.f1'"; 6 1},it; [I, i-iclrt •.ite, the total project would be valued at $1.30 million. EGONorthwest ExxstingCord Wens: Eoonamic and Housing Trends 43 Exhibit 37. Apartment Financial Performance Summary MF -1 Apartment Lot Size Total Building Area Floor Area Ratio llr:J Pr 1ar':] Sf. oi.s Fiasn.7. i.-1 I Summary Cost Cost F.i..?I 43.560 10,89'0 D. 25 12 14 Total Per Unit $1,488123 $1n6.65 sf $1,417,783 $130.19 sf 570,000 $5,000 pace 591,347 $9.81 sf Tut... A V.:11J : ResiciL..s1 Lond Val.me $1,304,962 $119.83 -$313,317 -57,19 Sosrrce: ECONarthwess, RS Mvans, CoSter,City ofSpokaneVolley Total t -c)!— c x.vc'LI projucte.d value. ,As a result a SIJ.°v` •]pili'. W]11:11AticSS t.) pay for this I -y othotic.li proEx'r hy i4 J-egLatik^e. making the prorci. finasoociall}' unfeasible. Ayuming conARK-Lipp 01:41- 30 pOt Cent wer, a developer's willingness to pay for I iypothetical property 4.'ould close to $95,0110, which is getting close to being financially feasible in the current market. Exhibit 38. Apartment Financial Performance Summary, ewer Cost MF -1 Apartment Lot Size Total Building Area Floor Area Ratio Units Parking Spats Fianarial Summary lied nr9 .GL Parking Coss NOl Total Value Residual Land Value 43,560 10,390 025 12 14 Total Per Unit S1,O84,5971` ` F .f Si,G10,257 $70,000 ", ,;t...J .,•:.Lr•: 91,347 S'1,301 Th? $9=1,248 S2__16 Source: ECDNorthwest, RS h1°ari . CoStar, Gityof Spokane Valley ECONo rt hwest Existing Conditions: Economic and Housing Trends 44 Mixed Use in the CMU Zone Building Program • The analysis assumed a hypothetical one acre nt1rl Cl 'MICA CMU on Sprague Avenue. ■ 3.i-od on the zoning codr, r .: c ' c l c r couldb u i I.H ='::..iii' = to mix of studios, one - bedroom, two-bedroom, ;. 11.:::1tr v L.,%!room unit:,) -:ri the parcel. ■ The building footprintco4, :: ti .}.ii half of the pWy�v'.I, GrC�r r di , :l iro_I.:r1 > ,4,[]4C} square feet of retail, 4,600 shall c tcc t of common area, and 2,30C ';41L1,11 I,. c:l L? tris E; - under parking_ • Parking requirements dictate a minimum of 67paxl uig space.,, which was assumed to be mostly surface parking. Open space accounts for about 5,000 square feet. Zoning dictates a minimum of 4,.600 square feet or 210 square feet per unit. Financial Assumptions Total cost of the project (excluding the cost of purchasing the property) would be $5.75 million. Per square foot costs are higher given the higher cost of constructing a concrete podium for the first floor. The analysis assurned a one -bedroom unit rents for about $80{1 per month and a two- bedroom unit rents for about $1r0D0 per month. • Assuming a 7.0% capitalization rater the total project would be valued at $5.07 million_ Exhibit 39. Mixed Use Financial Performance Summary Lot SIM Total Building Area Floor Area Ratio Units Parking Spots Fianatiai Summary Ir irvj Gait r.71 CMU Mixed -Use A3, 560 39,518 0.91 22 67 Total Per Unit �,? ,• ifs 5135.09 5x0-2,166 $6.153 5355,344 $11.2.5 sf sf space sf Total Value Residual Land Value 55,076.340 -$1.178,977 $126.46 -$27117 Source, ECONarthwest. RS Means, t tsr, City of Spokane Valley Total costs exceed projected value.i...- ;i r{,!:1.1 It a developer's willingness to pay for this hypothetical property is negative, makin , in:- project financially unfeasible. ECOrlorthwest Existing Conditions: Eccnom is and Housing Trends 45 Assuming rents are 25 percent higher, a developer's willingness to pay for the hypothetical property would be a little over $100,0130, which is getting close to being financially feasible in the current market, Exhibit 40. Mixed use Financial Performance Summary, Higher Rents CMU Minced -Use Lot Size Total Building Area Floor Area Ratio Units Parking Spots Fianacial Summary Total Cost Building Cost Parking Costs NOF 43,S60 39518 0.91 22 67 Total Per Unit $5,748,023 5145.45 st $5,338.518 $135.174 sf $409,166 $6,"53 space 5455,126 $14.41 sf Total Value Residual Land Value $6,501,801 $164.53 $143,938 $2,39 Saurpe: ECONarthwsst, PS VeOrs CoSTor, City of Spokane Valley ECONorthwest Existing Conditicn5: Economic and Housing Trends 46 FEHRt PEERS Fehr & Peers 1001 4th Avenue Suite 41 20 Seattle, WA 98154 Sicokane DRAFT REPORT Transportation System Existing Conditions st 2015 .00. Valley_ INTRODUCTION As Spokane Varey updates its Comprehensive Plan, an evaluation of existing conditions is being performed across a var ety of topics `rCm housing, to land use, to economic development. This document summari .t, ° t'_ nx'sting state of the transportation system. This aria 1p• i; _; required component of the Transportation Element otthe Comore hen alar] a{![i identities how the transportation network and the surrounding lar;+j usc°s influence the way people travel and how convenient that travel is for con-i:ruting, shopping, recreaLiriy, :rd other needs_ Based an this arwt l,]5is and an ext.,sive public outreach compcnent: challenges and cr,)portunities far the transportation network are iter t`iied that will be addressed as part Df the r,n y' ir3 Comprehensive Plan update. LAND USES AND KEY DESTINATION'S Since incorporation in 2003, the City of Spokane Valley has grown significantly, with approximately gz,000 residents currently living in the Valley as compared to 76,800 in 2000. Spokane Valley also added a total of approximately i0,coo jobs between 2000 and toy. Approximately Sa,000 7E'001,7 Work in Spokane Valley today, compared to under 4o,000 in 2000. FiyurQ ...,•1 irriarizes these trends. Respite its reputation as a bedroom community, Spokane VaI.ey :]FIs a relatively high jobs -to -housing ratio, with about 2.3 jobs per household, This ratio is higher than the Countywide average of 11, indicating that the Valley is a regional jobs center. The places where people live, work, and play are impacted by how a city and surrounding communities guide where development occurs. The Land Use Element of this Comprehensive Plan provides the framework for future land use growth in Spokane Valley. Understanding haw people currently travel to work is important to help accommodate the different ]nodes of transportation in the future. The way people commute to work largely depends on where they live, where their job is located, and the transportation options available. Figure 2 and Figure 3 highlight the existing population and employment density in the Valley. As shown in Figure 2, populati ❑n densities tend to be higher south of 1-90 and Figure 1 Existing Spokane Valley Job and Population Growth Spokane Valley Job and Population Growth ioo.aoU SDAQt} 60,04 30 40,4ao 20,000 2000 2002 2007 2011 2014 Source: LIS Census iitunen LI, 2015 PupuldLiu iulrs between Argonne and Sullivan Road. It should be noted that the areas north of I -go and east of Sullivan Road have some areas with dense housing as well, Fite Census tracts in these areas are much larger, though, and include parcels of undeveloped land, leading to lower population density area -wide. Employment in the Valley is generally concentrated along I -go, the 5v^!lar e Business and industrial Park, the industrial areas adjacent to Felts Airfield, •r ;: he Spokane Malley Mall, as displayed in Figure 3. The jobs in areas north of t-90 . nd to be more industrial in nature while south of I -go commercial and retail are more prevalent, It is importantto consider the differences in the retail and industrial areas adjacent to I -go as compared with where the majority of Valley residents live. The I -go corridor and areas north of it supporta high density of jobs but the residents predominantly live in the central and south parts of Spokane Valley. This separation off jobs, huusirsg, and retail results in some traffic congestion around the I -go int&.changes arid lints the viability of people walking and biking to work or shopping since people are generally uncomfortable walking or biking along busy streets. 7 Figure 2 Existing Population Density Spokane *Wane .Valley 1 7 1 MiLlywood • • — I — • F A. „ . . • z• .., 1 . - 1 1- c. L -ir - - 1 .1 • -.' • -, •• '''' 1- -. 1 ....- r ....... .I. 1 I.V.1:1!r'Str..'... fv., I I 1 1 ........ .,. ,. ".%.‘" i 1 I , - II i I ; 1 1 .i... 1 i I 1 i i -1 - i a, Lib-erry ..,.. t. ' 2 I 1 Lake -sir _..i 1 ...., - -..: --. i 1 _ _ I 111:As L I • ""“rtryn 1 .4.-.1 Av . 1 , ... 7, 7] r 'Clielli .-.........-r 1 ro ;', -..1 ... ...I I '`...1111•1101 , , 1 - 9:n A.c 1 , r.-. ?•7 1 .t.k. A, „.....,.. -.— r- F.-- 1 ,,.• iii 7.. t - I %. '2 -1h;5e 6 - 1 c_...airitir7.3 ...:- - - .... _ 1 .:. N. 1. spokane Lk/alley' NEM Population Density (Parsons per Square Mtte) 1,000 2.000 3,0014 4.000 5,000 ' 3.10, 1' 1: 1 t I a." 5. •11I Av 1172. 1 1 I c 3 Figure 3 Existing Employment Density Spokane Spinokane - J -.61 1 am' , 11011A0, --„2e,,, IhierrikiET _;110-dInviftkci—m Liberty Lake mai 11111iiii nag ark 11111WIFIT2.111PRME kill I Wilt Ili aim Ilt7VE-1F winu- 4•Lvit,1irli pir.•0 mfalmiivklictim *rag, Ay d z Nemo if it Po. ." r I.' i "--1 i =.7 6- 41 I - A, $ I v -." 4- 5 r 1.761..5., 1 -- .. - - 1:6_ _ _ _.... _../- - J Employment aprisity ()ribs per Square Mile) 250 500 1,000 3,000 22 =PM ralArj Sifitril‘111411Mii =17.7Ari o' -0E2 6.11•6 I =al =WE. rraboolors, F. 6_,.......... ..vir-nomenvaiie amon rig mr. ai. iliq.. NW at -c Jo ok. :a mas of_ ... k 1, --al *6 IN zrgh-liin .... „._ z -, 1\1 i Iv tEi rt: '..."1" I2thea....T , .2.1 ‘ I ITA ri I Eilli til I NA Mill = a 1,--111111114 1.0:1LIN i66.,;•" f i .._ _ . E,I, •;', ii.„., rt t .71 72 rid 64. n 2 girl PA. 7441, ,7.v - )16rh 2,1h ;66., nnt 1741) ek, J.--4 • 4 *Wane Valle TRANSPORTATION NETWORK OVERVIEW Spokane Valley's street system carries a variety of transportation modes that move people and freight throughout the Valley and surrounding Spokane County. While driving a car is the primary way that people get around in Spokane Valley, the street network accommodates many ,nodes of travel, including walking, bicycling, public transit, and freight. A gr€dried network provides improved connectivity for all farms of transportation, particularly walking and biking, by reducing the distance necessary to travel and providing alternative routes. In general, the roadway network in central and south Spokane Valley is composed of gridded streets, a reflection of the urban form typical during Spokane Valley's early development. Outside the central core, the network is primarily connected via principal and minor arterials, with large gaps between streets and many unconnected residential cul-de-sacs and Inop reads. This layout of large blocks creates a Tess friendly environment for walking, bicycling, and public transit since it can greatly increase the distance between a home and a destination or transit stop. Based on 2011 dab from the US Census Bureau's Longitudinal Employer - Household Dynamics (LEND) survey, about 38,800 people commute into Spokane Valley for work. Approximately 2;800 city residents commute out of the Valley for work, while about 13,800 residents stay in the Valley for work. These data are summarized in Figure r_ Figure 4 Corrnmute Flow in addition to collecting information on where Valley residents work, the Census Bureau also tracks how Spokane Valley residents travel to work—a statistic known as mode share. As shown in Figure 5, F n.r,% of Spokane Valley residents drove to work alone while an additional zo.74/r carpooled. 3..% of Spokane Valley workers rade transit to work. of the remaining 5.8% of workers who reside in Spokane Valley, mast worked from home while others walked, biked, took taxis, rode motorcycles, or used other means. These mode shares are typical for an auto - oriented suburban community. € iqure 5 Commute t.,+1 ode to Work Walk 1.1% Tiaiisit 3.1% Carpool 1,0.7% Bike O.4% Other 4. 3% 5 *Wane Valley FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF ROADWAYS Streets function as a network. The efficiency of a street network is dependent upon how the streets are able to complement each other to serve different trip types. Functional classification is the process by which streets and highways are grouped into classes, or systems, according to the character of service they are intended to provide. A proper balance of classes is necessary to effectively serve a mix of land uses and modes of travel. Spokane Valley currently classifies its roadways into principal arterials, minor arterials, collector arterials, and local streets, as shown in Table 1. Functional Classification of Roadways are displayed in Figure G. Additionally, there are state and federal highways within the Valley. Examples of each roadway type and their major characteristics are described below. Table 1 Functional Classification of Roadways Roadway y Description i Purpose Type interstate/ Provide high speed, free flow travel between Highway regional destinations. -go Principal Arterial A roadway that serves through trips and connects Spokane Valley with the rest ofthe area. Minor Arterial E Trent Ave Fines Rd (SR 27 E Sprague Ave Miner arterial streets provide inter - neighborhood connections, transit access, and serve both local and through trips. Can accemrrrcdate pedestrian and bicycle travel if there are sidewalks and bike lanes/paths. Collectors Arteria i Local Streets Collectors distribute trips between local streets and arterials. Can be good for pedestrian and bicycle travel if there are sidewalks and bike lanes/paths. Local streets provide circulation and access within residential neighborivods. Good for bicycle and pedestrian travel. E Broadway Ave S Evergreen Rd E 16th Ave Vista Rd E 41" Ave E 24.t" Ave E Valieyway Ave Long Rd Figure 6 Roadway Network and Funitiona Classification z u4— lig.a,. W.c lrl islet Cittyot! rtSpokan6'VfaI Iey 1 1 SRTC FEDERAL Ft FICITION ['r)1 1Off'SNf)A_i.vl: L`-ILIJ:) either ray a furs t Ikrw.rdury r}I fxlw4wr.1r ray fS,pdamn 1.rr1ev l.urp.sar+,ctrr,IFr. 6 SO114R .0001/alley EXISTING PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES Residents and visitors in Spokane Valley walk as part of their daily travel for many reasons. Children attending school, commuters taking the bus or connecting with a rarpnnl to get to work, and senior citizens making midday trips all require safe pedestrian amenities. Sidewalks, crosswalks, curb ramps, and small curb radii are all key features in creating a safe and welcoming environment for people to walk. Buffers between sidewalks and lanes of traffic, such as landscaping or on -street parking, can also increase safety and comfort for pedestrians, particularly on arterial streets. Figure 7 shows examples of sidewalks and trails in Spokane Valley. Sidewalks are present on both sides of most principal and minor arterials in Spokane Valley as well as some collectors, as shown in Figure B. The Valley has also prioritized providing sidewalks near schools, libraries, transit locations, and trailheads. While quiet residential streets may not require sidewalks for a safe pedestrian environment with the exception of key routes to schools), some arterials Pack sidewalk coverage, such as Mission Ave, 4th Ave, and Adams Rd. Plans for adding to the sidewalk network generally focus on filling existing gaps on arterials. in addition to Sidewalks and crosswalks along streets, Spokane Valley also has paved shared -use paths for pedestrians and bicyclists. The Centennial Trail provides a dedicated east -west connection along a shared -use path. The trail is part of a regional connection through Spokane and to the Washington -Idaho state border. The new Appieway Trail provides an additional east -west corridor for pedestrians and bicyclists along the former Milwaukie Railroad right-of-way. The Valley is actively working on extending the Appleway Trail. Spokane Valley has also identified more opportunities for shared use paths along former and active rail lines_ Typical of communities built in the post -World War II era, Spokane Valley has a well-developed grid of arterial streets spaced roughly a half -mile apart. While this system is efficient for vehicle travel, crossing major streets like Sprague Avenue or Pines Road can be difficult on faot or bike since signalized crosswalks are spread far apart. Additionally, crossings of ago and Trent Avenue are limited and are often located at busy interchanges or intersections. These gaps in safe crossing locations isolate areas of the Valley and lead to people driving for short trips that they could typically make on foot or via transit. Figure 7 Existinc Pedestrian Facilities in Spokane Valley F Figure S Existing Pedestrian Facilities Spokane r L 1 F^'y:yrl,, I____ T _ I Mil1W©lad 5 1 1 _ t ! c ■ 1 ! 1rvJ.! s 51 TI II k pokane Nancy P., I" I1_ - r rf lanoolOO _41C ti , IR of — J Z,!.1.1 .4v stn n. I: — l 'Yl, AV T t Ei 17 ell I, 1 I - rr-- Ap 1' la.1 V _— I ► _. I. a� 111?1,1or 1 I._ -.1 t �r r =3rd —1 Alki•W _ p i ,a �i e4A•: Sl 1'r - $f Sidewalks Existing Sidewalks Pedestrian Facilities Existing Shared Use Path PedfBike Bridge r e f 0. ra +�4 I— v 'I Liberty Lake 8 pin a1 ey EXISTING BICYCLE FACILITIES Similar to sidewalks, bicycle facilities are an important element in the transportation network that provide a safe and identifiable bicycling environment. Bicyclists in the City of Spokane Valley can utilize a variety of facilities, including shared -use paths, bike lanes, and bike friendly routes to reach their destination as shown in Figure 9. However, gaps in the network create a less safe environment in which cyclists must navigate through vehicle traffic or difficult arterial crossings to complete their journey. While the Valley has trails and bike lanes that form a spine of north -south and east -west connections, some of these facilities are not continuous and require bicyclists to merge in and out of traffic. The existing roadway geometry in many parts of Spokane Valley includes wide lanes, on -street parking, and a high number of driveways, which make many bicyclists feel uncomfortable riding in the street, Some corridors, such as Sprague Ave and Mission Ave, have striped bike lanes but also high vehicle speeds and volumes. PUBLIC TRANSIT Public transit, provided by Spokane Transit Authority (STA)via buses and vans, serves as a key component of the transportation network that connects residents with employment centers, public places, and regional destinations. Many Spokane Valley residents and employees use public transit for trips around and outside of the Valley. Figure 1.0 highlights the route and stop coverage of STA in Spokane Valley. Additionally, the map highlights the Pence -Cole Valley and Mirabeau Point transit centers and park -and -rides that provide links to the regional transit system. Spokane Transit Authority operates one frequent bus route between Downtown Spokane and Spokane Valley that runs every 15 minutes during weekday peak and day times. This route, number go, is the second busiest route that STA operates, with nearly 3,300 passengers on an average weekday. STA also has five basic routes serving Spokane Valley and providing connections to Spokane, Millwood, and Liberty Lake. Two express routes provide direct, high-speed connections between Downtown Spokane, the Valley Transit Center, and Mirabeau Point Park— and-Ririe. These routes serve y,o©a riders per day during the week and cover most of Spokane Valley's major destinations, including the Mall, the University Shopping Center, the Valley Hospital Medical Center, the Argonne Village Shopping Center, the Spokane Industrial Park, and many area schools. 9 Figure 9 Existing Bicycle Facilities Spokar t4 dv Silekane �Mi11ey g L I =- . _ I 1 t \ '...._1, Fear Iflf fff4 , JYF ..1 1 -.„, r - : .yds,:' 1 1 'Millwood y I tia .L , _ 1 -.JP • F ~ x x 1 .lv.ICSIe'a PV': T ar t - P.L, 3rd ?..-wrpt Fs V i e afh R4 .. k ;; 1. vp — ▪ 91e,;. . L P . n k! rh ,3y % —r—_# rk i , 1 • t 4 1 1714 f., i Bicycle Facilities — e=xisting Bike Lane - Existing Shared Use Path - Pee/Bike bridge ..:hr. dta;ry y1 Spokane f Valley' " '"'`! r 1 1 5 liberty Lake 1 r raa ,L_ Y � rd :Sf"F,v i 21mA°, . tFi�d �f. r�tn��.r _ sl1rnv iv..n I %3'r;ty A'. I a L + S P �� jfjj —P r21-1-411.1.,.. 1 z_ k = s —7 - 14 . Stiehrt•, L� ter* f � s - 10 Figure it) Existing Transit Facilities Spokane t 54,14i::, - J �y 6 1M1 I Q,...,..:.". __ I z I Millwood , I I , tira.`" 1 .3r6 51^ Iti: r — ` }pence C[Y14 1aIr5y til 1 — r--1 1 • f w y 5 Ttenii[ Center k= k � r ` J ti �tuiv I 5oer�c r'v. 131h.:, FV Mirabeau Point Park and Ride Spokane Val key 1 ma. 7[15 • rJ 221-11 lith 11+; 1 y 7b:ri n. Transit Rautos Bus Stop Desk (32,66,94,96,97,98) Express (173,171) Frequent 434,93) zu:lf6 f:e x.:Eiu,.4,. _+7 Liberty 1 Lake I = r 1 S� r ? 1-h h,r_ • 14 r 11 SOOKane ,Walley GOODS MOVEMENT Freight and goods movement is a vital element of the transportation network. Everyone is directly impacted by how goods are delivered to distribution centers, stores, and homes. Spokane Valley is center to a high volume of freight movement owing to the Valley's major retail ane industrial properties. Trucks move millions of tons of freight via I-90 and Trent Ave throughout the region and across the state. Several arterials in Spokane Valley also support high levels of freight, including Argonne Rd, and portions of Sprague Ave, Appleway Blvd, Sullivan Rd, Fancher Way, and Broadway Ave. These corridors are all rated at Ti or T2 based on the annual freight tonnage they support, Enough freight travels over many other arterials and some collectors to qualify them as T3 freight corridors. These classifications are based on the following amount of goods: • T -a: More than so million tons per year • T -x: Oto 20 million tans per year • T-3: 300,000 to 4 million tons per year The Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway (BNSF) and Union Pacific Railroad (UP) operate the primary rail lines within the City of Spokane Valley_ Both companies have connections to the Washington -Idaho border while BNSF's route represents the company's main transcontinental line connecting the West Coast to Chicago and the Midwest. These rail lines help form the industrial corridor north of I -go that supports many jobs in Spokane Valley, in addition to the UP line that runs north of Sprague and along Dishrnan-Mica Rd south through the City limits. Figure 11 displays the freight network, 13 pian .000 Valley Figure 11. Existing Freight Corridors Spokane rC v LA 1IIIMPF .� r 3�'I Ja *F.+ ,- + Millwoid , � k ,xns.cy i.. _f--1 g t. L _ �y f I Liber Lake 1 V IT. 1 3 1- s.r A. I 7 11[na,. "t/" -1- - - r Y F 1 li41:;5v r J t1 1 � in ILA, I +r } M11 4 .. 1t 22.0.! •'1••• u Route r las5ificatiun - T-1: > 70 million tong year — T-2: 4-10 million tong{year — T-3' 300,000.4 million tons/year Railroads t irF ILA I .0.,01.k:--01 r - - J J # 13 *Wane .000 Valley MOTOR VEHICLES Most Spokane Valley residents (about go%) use motor vehicles as their primary mode of transportation to work. Moreover, many non-resident travelers pass through the Valley via I -go, or park at the Pence -Cole Valley Transit Center or MIra beau Point Park -and -Ride and take public trar sit into Spokane. Analysis of Spokane Valley's congestion for motorists is based On traffic counts collected In zone. Each of the major roadways in Spokane Valley was evaluated based an its ability to accommodate PM peak hour demand with its existing width and Zane configuration. Figure xz displays enr,ual average daily traffic counts. The corridors were scored into one of six level of service (LOS) categories based on the volume of traffic they support during the PM peak hour compared to typical volume thresholds for urban arterial roadways. Levels from LOS A to LOS F correspond to a range of completely uncongested to highly -congested conditions. Table z describes the LOS definitions laid out in Chapter I6 of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM} (Transportation Research Board, zolo), which fs the methodology applied to Spokane Valley's transportation network. Table 2 Level of Service Definitions vel of Service Descripeipn Free-flowing conditions. Stable operating conditions. Stable operating conditions, but individual motorists are affected try the interaction with other motorists. High density of motorists, but stable flow. E Near -capacity operations, with speeds reduced to a low but Jniforrn speed. F Over capacity, with long delays. Source: 2020 Highway Capacity Manual. The LOS standards for the City of Spokane Valley are as follows. ■ LOS D for signalized intersections • LOS E for unsignaiized intersections As highways of statewide significance (HSS), I go, Pines Rd (SR 2.7)and Trent Ave (SR eco) have LOS standards set by the Washington State Department of Transportation. The Valley's LOS standards do not apply to these state facilities. While the Valley's LOS standards are based on intersection operations, it is irnpractical to calculate intersection LOS for the hundreds of intersections around the City. Therefore, as is typical for many Comprehensive Plan Transportation Elements, LOS is summarized at the street -segment level. In general, the intersections along the street segments can be expected to operate at the same LOS as the segment. Figure 13 shows the calculated LOS on Spokane Valley's major streets daring the PM peak hour. Spokane Valley's roadways generally operate with moderate conpest'cn on some arterials during the PM peak hour_ I -go can be congested during the _ eak hour, and some motorists may choose to take city streets instead of I -go to avoid congestion. This overflow can lead to congestion on roadways that serve interchanges, such as Argonne/Mullan Rd, Pines Rd (SR et, Sprague Ave, Sullivan Rd, and Barker Rd. Except for these few instances of more severe congestion, most roadways operate within Spokane Valley's LOS standards. These congestion levels around the 'Valley are fairly common for suburban arterials during the PM peak hour. The delay will he disruptive for a brief panic of the day, but is also indicative of a well -used roadway network. principal arterials that operate at LOS A through C during the peak period may be a sign of an overbuilt system, which can be costly fora community to construct and ,maintain. These large, underutilized streets also can be a deterrent for other modes because of high speeds, perceived safety concerns, and difficulty crossing. se „ci ane .000Milley. Figure 12 Annual Average Daily Traffic City of Spokane Valley All -Day Traffic Counts (By Year) 1w' b12UL 7 31.2674 Legend Year of Most Recent Count - 201 (2) 2D12 (35) - 2613 (13D) 2014 1134) 15 Figure 3.3 Auto LO5 Sp:liana ._ J) ' • F Millwood 4 • ''. ...• ,=...... .... ''' I I ,;:-r, i !-...s*n . ... .., ........ E 1 11 ,,-.5 Ii p: App 117 1 .- _1_r_. 1 - . . i : lth Stri —1 [ 1...p % I -5. 11 _ i ..„.__./.-.7..- .... 1 F 11. I 4 I1 I I 1.::::. I7.;,------. .... ' -, c. % d %,... Level of Service AC E =MI= F Spokane Valley •••••••,. — 1 ;raw Euclid f ur..1_113 r Liberty Lake l I iD radi.ai 4 g - - a6 SOlane .000 Valley CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES to the spring of eon;, Spokane valley hosted a series of public meetings to 5a1 lot feedback from the public on a variety of topics, including the per,"erneenre of the transportaticn system. During this public feedback period, tyre project team collected considerable feed bac on what parts of the transpor':atian system is working well, transportation problems/concerns, and what the Valley's transportation future should look like. This feedback, combined with the results of the existing conditions analysis, highlights challenges and opportunities for the transportation system, as listed bel aw. CHALLENGES ■ Many localkesidential streets do not have curb, gutter, or sidewalks (a relic of development prior to Spokane Valley's incorporation). While some streets are low-volume and may not need these features, key access routes to schools, transit stops, arid civic buildings could benefit enhancements. • Lona blocks and high traffic speeds can make it difficult to cross major streets like Sprague or Sullivan_ This makes traveling by transit difficult, walking/hiking to stares, or traveling to parks and schools difficult. • Transit service is minimal in parts of the Valley, requiring that people drive to reach their destinations. Several members of the public expressed a desire for mere extensive transit 'coverage. • The region's positort or a major freight rail corridor increases the risk of train collisions and delays caused by at -grade crossings. • Several members af the public ideetifiecl the Valley's "streetscape," which includes landscaping, building frontages, medians, etc. as unattractive and lacking in character. Suggestions to improve the streetscape included more street trees, building frontage improvernentslmore private landscaping, and "gateway" features in medians and public spaces on the side of streets. • The public identified concerns over traffic congestion in same corridors, including Argonne, Pines, Sullivan, and Barker, particularly around the I -go interchanges. OPPORTUNITIES • 'Compared to other cities in the region, residents highlighted the good state of repair with respect to street maintenance. This results in lower overall costs to reconstruct streets and more oppar-1:G 1-sitie s to invest in other city priorities. • Despite some traffic congestion around freeway interchanges, many residents consider the Valley's LOS policy to be working .veil — successfully balancing traffic congestion, access n Beds, and costs to build and maintain the system. • The city has a robust grid of major streets and can support a considerable amount of additional economic development, • Good connections to the national freeway and railway network which support economic development opportunities. • Spokane Valley has a strong pedestrian and bicycle plan and has been aggressively expanding the trail network by leveraging regional and federal funding. NEXT STEPS The next stage it updating the Transportation =lee -Fit of the Comprehensive Plan involve, =precasting future transportation network needs, defining updated goals and polices, and identifying a fiscally balanced long-term transportation project list. As we move forward, the challenges and opportunities identified above will serve as guideposts to ensure that we are addressing current concerns and leveraging existing assets. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: February 23, 2016 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ['consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ['public hearing ['information ® admin. report ['pending legislation ['executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Spokane County Regional Animal Protection Service (SCRAPS) Update. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Interlocal Agreement for Animal Control Services in the City of Spokane Valley. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: In January 2013 Council approved an Interlocal Agreement with Spokane County for the provision of animal control services. BACKGROUND: In 2012 the City issued a request for proposals (RFP) for the provision of animal control services and received responses from two local providers. After considerable research and deliberation SCRAPS was ultimately selected and staff set about negotiating an Interlocal Agreement that was approved by the City Council in January 2013. At about the same time, Spokane County also entered into similar agreements for services with the City of Spokane and a number of smaller surrounding jurisdictions. In summary, the Interlocal Agreement contains the following provisions: Term: Became effective on January 1, 2014 and runs for a term of 20 -years, expiring December 31, 2033. Cost: The annual cost of service includes two components: Operating cost: Fixed at $242,081 in 2014 and may increase by a measure of the consumer price index (CPI) each year. Debt Service: In 2014 the County issued $5.9 million in general obligation bonds to acquire the building where SCRAPS is now located as well as make substantial renovations to meet operational needs. The portion of the bond issue attributable to the City of Spokane Valley's use was set at $900,000 and the City will reimburse the County at the rate of $45,000 per year through 2033. O&M Debt Service Total 2014 Fee 242, 081.00 45, 000.00 287, 081.00 2015 cpi increase - % x 1.30% 2015 cpi increase - $ = 3,147.05 2015 Fee 245,228.05 45,000.00 290,228.05 2016 cpi increase - % x 0.40% 2016 cpi increase - $ = 980.91 2016 Fee 246, 208.96 45, 000.00 291, 208.96 1 Cost for animal control services since incorporation are as follows (and noteworthy here is the cost containment achieved through competitive bidding, contract negotiations and contract management): 2003 288,120 2004 399,555 2005 403,770 2006 426,633 2007 327,582 2008 332,839 2009 335,537 2010 314,255 2011 306,923 2012 284,926 2013 295,556 2014 242,081 2015 245,228 2016 246,209 0 288,120 (Apr - Dec 2003) 0 399,555 0 403,770 0 426,633 0 327,582 0 332,839 0 335,537 0 314,255 0 306,923 0 284,926 0 295,556 45,000 287,081 45,000 290,228 45,000 291,209 Animal Control Services: Specific services are categorized between Field, Shelter and Educational including hours of operation and days of service. Regional Animal Control Advisory Board: A Regional Animal Advisory Board of Directors is called for and is composed of five members including two from Spokane County, two from the City of Spokane Valley and a fifth representative that is jointly appointed. Each member of the Board is expected to have financial or budget experience and be available to meet at least quarterly to review operations and discuss budget matters. Approval of Annual SCRAPS Budget: • An annual budget shall be submitted by the SCRAPS Director to the Board of Directors by September 1 of each calendar year. • By October 1 the Board of Directors will consider and make a written recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners. • By November 1 the Board of County Commissioners will respond to the Board of Directors in writing either in agreement with the recommendations of the Board of Directors or suggesting changes. • The Board of Directors has until December 1 to respond to any changes proposed by the Board of County Commissioners. • The Board of County Commissioners ultimately makes the final decision on the budget. SCRAPS Budget • Revenue sources include income from contracting cities, animal licenses, shelter services and contributions. Revenues in 2016 are projected at $3,525,339. • Expenses reflect the cost of operations including shelter operations and animal pick-up. Expenditures in 2016 are budgeted at $3,797,178. • 2016 Expenditures are expected to be $271,839 greater than revenues which will in -part be covered by $116,070 transfer from other designated fund balances accounted for outside 2 Debt Year O&M Service Total 2003 288,120 2004 399,555 2005 403,770 2006 426,633 2007 327,582 2008 332,839 2009 335,537 2010 314,255 2011 306,923 2012 284,926 2013 295,556 2014 242,081 2015 245,228 2016 246,209 0 288,120 (Apr - Dec 2003) 0 399,555 0 403,770 0 426,633 0 327,582 0 332,839 0 335,537 0 314,255 0 306,923 0 284,926 0 295,556 45,000 287,081 45,000 290,228 45,000 291,209 Animal Control Services: Specific services are categorized between Field, Shelter and Educational including hours of operation and days of service. Regional Animal Control Advisory Board: A Regional Animal Advisory Board of Directors is called for and is composed of five members including two from Spokane County, two from the City of Spokane Valley and a fifth representative that is jointly appointed. Each member of the Board is expected to have financial or budget experience and be available to meet at least quarterly to review operations and discuss budget matters. Approval of Annual SCRAPS Budget: • An annual budget shall be submitted by the SCRAPS Director to the Board of Directors by September 1 of each calendar year. • By October 1 the Board of Directors will consider and make a written recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners. • By November 1 the Board of County Commissioners will respond to the Board of Directors in writing either in agreement with the recommendations of the Board of Directors or suggesting changes. • The Board of Directors has until December 1 to respond to any changes proposed by the Board of County Commissioners. • The Board of County Commissioners ultimately makes the final decision on the budget. SCRAPS Budget • Revenue sources include income from contracting cities, animal licenses, shelter services and contributions. Revenues in 2016 are projected at $3,525,339. • Expenses reflect the cost of operations including shelter operations and animal pick-up. Expenditures in 2016 are budgeted at $3,797,178. • 2016 Expenditures are expected to be $271,839 greater than revenues which will in -part be covered by $116,070 transfer from other designated fund balances accounted for outside 2 the SCRAPS enterprise fund. This leaves SCRAPS with expenditures exceeding revenues by $155,769. They currently have a sufficient fund balance to cover this operating deficit. License Revenue & Other Items: • 2014 Animal License Budgeted Revenue was $1,450,862. • 2014 Actual License Revenue was $1,125,758. • City of Spokane was estimated to have $800,000 in annual pet license revenue in the regional model cost estimate but had less than $500,000 in revenue in 2014. • Total SCRAPS revenues were more than $600,000 under budget in 2014. • Debt Service Reserve Fund intended to be funded annually to a maximum of $300,000. No contributions have been made to this point. Service Workload Indicators and Performance Measures: Request for Service Impounds Investigations Emergency Calls Trapping Total 14,815 9,939 1,290 541 265 26,850 2014 Licensed Animals Dogs 41,297 Cats 15,768 Total 57.065 Total Live Release Rate Dogs 89.8% Cats 58.4% OPTIONS: N/A RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: This is simply an update and no Council action is required. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The City of Spokane Valley's 2016 Budget includes an appropriation of $295,133 to cover SCRAPS expenses which we now know will actually be $291,209 including $246,209 for operations and $45,000 for a debt service reimbursement. Through the balance of the Interlocal Agreement, the cost may increase by no more than the CPI assessed against the operations component. The debt service portion is fixed through the 20 -year life of the agreement. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun, Deputy City Manager, and Morgan Koudelka, Senior Administrative Analyst ATTACHMENTS: Interlocal Agreement for Animal Control Services in the City of Spokane Valley. 3 rw./V I. 1.7- 00 errta INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES IN TIM CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at 1116 West Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington 99260, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY" and the City of Spokane Valley, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane, Washington 99206, hereinafter referred to as "CITY," jointly hereinafter referred to as the "PARTIES." The COUNTY and CITY agree as follows. SECTION NO. l: RECITALS AND FINDINGS (a) The Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County has the care of COUNTY property and the management of COUNTY funds and business under RCW 36.32.120(6). (b) Counties and cities may contract with each other to perform certain functions which each may legally perform under chapter 39.34 RCW (Interlocal Cooperation Act). (c) Pursuant to the provisions of 36.32.120(6) and RCW 36.32.120(7), Spokane County, through its Board of County Commissioners, may enact ordinances dealing with animal control within the unincorporated area of Spokane County. (d) Pursuant to the provisions of RCW 35A.11.020, the City of Spokane Valley may enact ordinances dealing with animal control within its boundaries. (e) Spokane County intends on acquiring and improving property ("Regional Animal Control Facility") from which Spokane County will provide certain animal control services to itself, the City of Spokane Valley, and other governmental jurisdictions. The cost of acquiring and improving the Regional Animal Control Facility will be financed in part through the operational savings realized by the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County and other governmental jurisdictions contracting with Spokane County to receive animal control services from the Regional Animal Control Facility. Spokane County desires to enter into an agreement with the City of Spokane Valley wherein the City will contract to receive animal control services from the County for a term of twenty (20) years thus providing the County with operational savings to finance in part the County's acquisition and improvement of the Regional Animal Control Facility. (f) The City of Spokane Valley desires to utilize the services of Spokane County for the purpose of performing certain animal control services within the boundaries of the City of Spokane Valley for a term of twenty (20) years. Page 1 of 22 SECTION NO. 2: DEFINITIONS (a) Agreement: "Agreement" means this Interlocal Agreement between the CITY and COUNTY regarding animal control services. (b) City: "CITY" means the City of Spokane Valley. (c) County: "COUNTY" means Spokane County. (d) Services: "Services" means those services identified in Attachment "1" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. (e) Annual Fee: "Annual Fee" means that annual amount of money which the CITY will pay the COUNTY to provide Services. The annual fee shall be comprised of debt service costs and operating costs as further addressed in Section No. 5. (f) Uncontrollable Circumstances: "Uncontrollable Circumstances" means the following events: strikes, riots, wars, civil disturbances, insurrections, acts of terrorism, fires and floods, weather conditions, volcanic eruptions, lightning or earthquakes or other acts of God at or near where the Services are performed and/or that directly affect providing of such Services. (g) Consumer Price Index: "Consumer Price Index" or "CPI" means the percentage change between the current year index and the previous year index as determined by United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, West -Size Class B/C, Consumer Price Index, All items for all urban consumers (CPI -U), Base year Annual Average. See Attachment "2". For example, as shown on Attachment "2" the CPI for calendar year 2012 is 3.0%. It was calculated by determining the difference in the CPI -U for 2010 and CPI -U for 2011, dividing this number by the CPI -U for 2010 and rounding the number to the nearest 1/10 of 1%. (LE. Difference between 133.778 and 137.748 = 3.97/133.778=2.96 rounded up to 3.) (h) Regional Animal Control Facility: "Regional Animal Control Facility" means that entire property acquired, improved and owned by Spokane County from which the County will provide Services. SECTION NO. 3: PURPOSE The purpose of this Agreement is to reduce to writing the PARTIES' understandings as to the tenns and conditions under which the COUNTY will provide Services on behalf of the CITY. Page 2 of 22 SECTION NO. 4: DURATION/WITHDRAWAL This Agreement shall commence on January 1, 2014, ("Commencement Date") and run for a term of twenty (20) years. In the event the COUNTY for any reason whatsoever is unable to commence providing Services on the Commencement Date, it will provide the CITY with at least six (6) months advance written notice which shall state the date upon which the COUNTY will provide Services. This twenty (20) year time frame shall be referred to as the "Initial Term." The PARTIES acknowledge that the Initial Term is necessary in order for the COUNTY to realize operational savings which it will use to acquire and improve the Regional Animal Control Facility. At the conclusion of the Initial Term, this Agreement may be renewed upon mutual agreement of the PARTIES. All renewals shall be subject to all terms and conditions set forth herein unless otherwise mutually agreed upon. If the COUNTY does not mutually agree to a renewal, or terminates the Agreement as provided for herein after during the renewal time frame, then the COUNTY shall pay the CITY an amount of money equal to the unamortized value of the Regional Animal Control Facility as of the date of nonrenewal or termination. The value of the Regional Animal Control Facility for the purpose of the provision shall be based on the original acquisition cost plus improvements less the COUNTY's up -front contribution of $900,000 multiplied by 22.9% depreciated over fifty (50) years from the date of occupancy. Once effective, this Agreement can only be terminated by: (1) mutual agreement of the PARTIES; or (2) with respect to all obligations of either party except the CITY's obligation for debt service costs, the CITY may terminate upon 6 months written notification to the COUNTY in advance of January 15t of any calendar year. In the event of termination under this provision, the CITY shall still retain responsibility for its share of the debt services costs through the remainder of the term of the Agreement. At the COUNTY'S option this amount may be paid by the CITY over the remaining term of the Agreement or in a lump sum amount. Upon termination, the CITY will have the right to purchase any vehicles and/or equipment used to provide Services which the COUNTY determines are surplus to it needs. The price shall be mutually agreed upon by the PARTIES. Subsequent to the Initial Term, either party may terminate this Agreement for any reason whatsoever upon a minimum of six months advance notice as provided for in Section 7 to the other party. After the initial term, no depreciation or building use fees attributable to the original acquisition and improvement of the Regional Animal Control Facility shall be charged to the CITY for the remaining useful life of the Regional Animal Control Facility. SECTION NO. 5: COST OF SERVICES AND PAYMENTS The CITY shall pay the COUNTY an annual fee for Services provided under this Agreement. The annual fee for Services contemplates Services commencing as of January 1St of each year and Page 3 of 22 running through December 31st of each year. The annual fee shall be comprised of debt service costs and operating costs. Debt service costs shall remain fixed through the life of the Agreement or until the debt service costs have been retired, whichever occurs first. The annual debt service costs will be FORTY-FIVE THOUSAND AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($45,000.00). The operating cost for the calendar year 2014 will be TWO HUNDRED FORTY TWO THOUSAND EIGHTY ONE AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($242,081.00). For each subsequent year, the PARTIES agree that the annual operating costs shall be determined by the Board of County Commissioners based on a written recommendation from the Regional Animal Control Advisory Board of Directors and process as provided for herein after, not to exceed limitations contained within Section No. 5(C)(6) In the event the term of this Agreement commences at other than the beginning of any calendar year, the annual operating costs will be prorated on a daily basis for that year. A. Establishment of Regional Animal Control Advisory Board There shall be established a Regional Animal Control Advisory Board of Directors ("Board of Directors") for the term of the Agreement. The Board of Directors shall consist of five (5) members, two (2) representatives to be appointed by each party and a fifth representative to be jointly appointed. The appointees shall have financial or budget experience. A majority of the Board of Directors shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of any business so long as both the COUNTY and the CITY are represented. The number of representatives may be modified by recommendation of the Board of Directors and agreed to by the PAR i'ihS The Board of Directors shall meet at the call of the Spokane County Regional Animal Protection Service Department Director at least quarterly and more frequently, if necessary, during the adoption of the annual budget. The Spokane County Regional Animal Protection Service Department Director or his/her designee shall attend all Board of Director meetings as a non-voting member. B. Responsibility of the Board of Directors with regard to the annual budget of the Spokane County Regional Animal Protection Service Department Services will be provided by the COUNTY through Spokane County Regional Animal Protection Service Department ("SCRAPS"). SCRAPS shall be operated as an enterprise fund. For the purposes of this Agreement the terminology "enterprise fund" shall mean a fund that provides goods and services for a fee which makes the entity providing the goods and services self-supporting. An "enterprise fund" complies with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Page 4 of 22 The SCRAPS Director shall prepare an annual budget for SCRAPS. The annual budget shall minimally include all revenues, including Regional Animal Control Facility revenues and grant revenues, by source anticipated by SCRAPS for the following calenda budget year and shall additionally include: (i) debt service to acquire and remodel the Regional Animal Control Facility, (ii) debt service / building reserve fund, (iii) cash reserve of 10% of annual budgeted operating expenditures, and (iv) operating costs for SCRAPS providing Services including, but not limited to salary/wages, benefits and other annual operating costs. The anneal budget shall be submitted by the SCRAPS Director to the Board of Directors on or before September 1st of each calendar year for the following year. The annual budget will include indirect costs calculated in accordance with the COUNTY's Countywide OMB A-87 Cost Allocation Plan. No costs billed directly to SCRAPS will be included in the indirect costs._On or before October 1st each calendar year, the Board of Directors shall consider and make a written recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners on the annual budget for SCRAPS. On or before November 1st of each calendar year the Board of County Commissioners shall in writing acknowledge and agree in writing with the written recommendation by the Board of Directors or suggest changes to the written recommendation. If the Board of County Commissioners suggests changes to the written recommendation, the Board of County Commissioners shall not take formal action on the adoption of the annual budget until it receives a written response from the Board of Directors on the suggested changes. The written response from the Board of Directors on the suggested changes must be received by the Board of County Commissioners on or before December 1st. In the event the Board of County Commissioners does not receive a written recommendation from the Board of Directors on or before October 1St as provided for herein or a response to suggested changes by *December 1St as provided for herein, the Board of County Commissioners shall adopt the SCRAPS annual budget taking into consideration the financial goals set forth subparagraph (C) hereinafter. The Board of County Commissioners' decision on the budget shall be binding on the PARTIES. C. Financial Goals In conjunction with the preparation of the annual budget by the SCRAPS Director, recommendation(s) on the annual budget by the Board of Directors and adoption of the annual budget by the Board of County Commissioners, every effort will be made to increase efficiencies, enhance revenues and control costs. Additionally, the SCRAPS Director, Board of Directors and Board of County Commissioners shall take into consideration economic conditions, revenue forecasts for the PARTIES and other participating jurisdictions as well as any state wide initiatives or legislative actions that would impact the PARTIES or other participating jurisdictions. Also, the following financial goals shall be considered: 1. Annual debt service for acquisition and remodeling of the Regional Animal Control Facility must be paid. Page 5 of 22 2. Maintaining a reasonable cash reserve of 10% of annual budgeted operating expenditures. Provided in conjunction with this financial goal, the PARTIES shall identify a time line and method for establishing the cash reserve. The time line and method of accumulating the cash reserve shall consider, but not be limited to, utilizing special assessments, and/or utilizing revenue(s) from other SCRAPS programs, and/or utilizing short term borrowing. Upon termination of the Agreement, the CITY shall receive 22.29% of the cash reserve balance existing at the time of termination if the City of Spokane has contracted for Services with the COUNTY by January 1, 2014. The 22.29% was determined as set forth in Attachment "3" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. If the City of Spokane has not contracted for Services with the COUNTY by January 1, 2014, the CITY shall receive 46.16% of the cash reserve balance existing at the time of termination. The 46.16% was determined as set forth in Attachment "4" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Any amount due shall be refunded within thirty (30) days of termination. 3. Maintain an optimum level of Service relative to available financial resources of participating jurisdictions which is reflected in the annual budget operating costs which includes, but is not limited to, salary/wages, benefits and other operating cost items, based upon the recommendation of the SCRAPS Director. 4. Any amount in the enterprise fund in excess of funds to satisfy financial goals (1), (2) and (3) shall be placed in a debt service / building reserve fund at a targeted amount of up to Sixty Thousand Dollars ($60,000.00) a year or until the debt service / reserve fund reaches the amount of Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000.00). The debt service / building reserve fund will be utilized as a reserve fund to pay delinquent debt service costs and/or to repair the Regional Animal Control Facility as needed. The Board of Directors will approve the use of these funds to pay delinquent debt service costs and/or repair of the Regional Animal Control Facility except in the case of emergency repairs, in which instance the Board of County Commissioners will authorize the use of these funds with notification to the Board of Directors as soon as possible thereafter. Upon the use of the debt service / building reserve funds, the Board of Directors will replenish the fund in the manner described at the beginning of this section. The Board of Directors may recommend an increase in the debt service / building reserve fund amount in their annual written recommendation but otherwise the balance will not exceed Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000). Upon termination of the Agreement during the Initial Term, or at the end of Initial Term, or any renewal thereof, the CITY shall receive the amount it contributed toward the debt service/building reserve fund. Provided, however, if the termination is during the Initial Term, the CITY shall not receive the amount it contributed toward the debt service/building reserve fund until the end of the Initial Term. Any amount due shall be refunded within thirty (30) days of termination, except when the termination occurs during the initial term, in which instance it shall be due thirty (30) days after the end of the Initial term. 5. Excess monies in the enterprise fiznd after financial goals (1), (2), (3) and (4) have been satisfied, may be rebated as recommended by the Board of Directors and approved by the Board of County Commissioners. 6. Under no circumstance can the proposed annual budget by the SCRAPS Director, recommendation thereon by the Board of Directors, or adopted budget by the Board of Page 6 of 22 County Commissioners cause the CITY's operating fee to exceed the previous year's annual operating fee plus the CPI. 7. The intent of this Agreement is to allow the CITY to participate in SCRAPS, a regional animal control system, in which all participating cities, towns and other governmental jurisdictions share equitably in the costs and revenues. If any city, town, or other governmental jurisdiction is offered more favorable terms than those offered to the CITY in this Agreement, excluding debt for governmental jurisdictions with a population of less than 20,000 inhabitants and excluding start-up costs, then those same terms shall also be offered to the CITY at the same time. If any jurisdiction receiving Services from SCRAPS as of January 1, 2013 cancels its agreement for Services, the level of service provided by SCRAPS may be reduced accordingly and neither the COUNTY, nor any other remaining jurisdiction receiving Services, shall have any responsibility to backfill any reduction in revenues. D. Billing / Payments The COUNTY shall advise the CITY in writing of its annual fee for Services on or before the first Monday of December for the subsequent calendar year. The CITY' s annual operating fee shall not exceed its previous year's annual operating fee plus the CPI. The City's anm,al capital fee shall remain fixed. There shall be no annual settle and adjust reconciliation with regard to any Services provided under this Agreement. However, variances between actual revenues and expenditures and the budgeted revenues and expenditures shall be taken into consideration when preparing the subsequent years' budgets. With regard to operating costs, in the first year of the Agreement, the COUNTY will bill the CITY for the cost of Services in seven payments. The first payment shall be due on or before January 5th. The first payment will equal one-half of the annual fee for that year. The following six (6) payments shall be in equal installments of 1/12 of the annual fee. Each installment shall be due on or before the July 5th, August 5th, September 5th, October 5th, November 5th, and December 5th. In subsequent years, the COUNTY will bill the CITY for the annual operating costs in twelve equal payments, each due by the fifth of each month of the calendar year. The COUNTY will bill the CITY by the 15th of the month immediately preceding the month when the payment is due. With regard to debt service costs, the COUNTY will bill the CITY on April 1st and October 1st each year for payments of one-half of the annual debt service costs (1/2 of $45,000.00 = $22,500.00). Each payment of TWENTY TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($22,500.00) shall be due by May 1st and November 15t of each calendar year respectively. The COUNTY, at its sole option, may charge interest on any late operating costs payments or debt service costs payments calculated on any lost interest earning had the amount due been invested since the date due to the date of payment in the COUNTY's investment pool. Page 7 of 22 SECTION NO. 6: RELATED RESPONSIBILITIES IN CONJUNCTION WITH PROVIDING SERVICES The COUNTY or its designee agrees to attend staff meetings as requested by the CITY. The COUNTY or its designee agrees to meet upon request by the CITY or its designee to discuss any Service provided under the terms of this Agreement. The CITY agrees the COUNTY may use the COUNTY's stationery in conjunction with providing Services under the terms of this Agreement. The Spokane County Regional Animal Protection Services Department Director or his/her designee will immediately notify the CITY of any animal caused injuries to humans, any animal abuse and/or hoarding cases, or any injury to an owned or stray animal occurring within the CITY and caused by an employee of SCRAPS while on duty. SECTION NO. 7: NOTICE All notices or other communications given hereunder shall be deemed given on: (i) the day such notices or other communications are received when sent by personal delivery; or (ii) the third day following the day on which the same have been mailed by first class delivery, postage prepaid addressed to the COUNTY or the CITY at the address set forth below for such party, or at such other address as either party shall from time -to -time designate by notice in writing to the other party: COUNTY: Spokane County Chief Executive Officer or his/her authorized representative 1116 West Broadway Avenue Spokane, Washington 99260 CITY: City of Spokane Valley Manager or his/her authorized representative 11707 East Sprague, Suite 106 Spokane Valley, Washington 99206 SECTION NO. 8: RECORDS REVIEW The CITY shall be allowed to conduct random reviews of the records generated by the COUNTY in performance of this Agreement. The CITY will provide the COUNTY with reasonable advance notice of the records reviews. The PARTIES agree that they will make best efforts to achieve a resolution of any potential records confidentiality issues, including entering into confidentiality agreements or other similar mechanisms that will allow disclosure of the necessary information to accurately conduct a records review. Page 8 of 22 SECTION NO. 9: COUNTERPARTS This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which, when so executed and delivered, shall be an original, but such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same. SECTION NO. 10: ASSIGNMENT No party may assign in whole or part its interest in this Agreement without the written approval of the other party. Provided, however, this does not prohibit the COUNTY from contracting for any euthanasia or cremation services. SECTION NO. 11: COUNTY EMPLOYEES The COUNTY shall hire, assign, retain and discipline all employees performing Services under this Agreement according to applicable collective bargaining agreements and applicable state and federal laws. The COUNTY agrees to meet and confer with the CITY with respect to staff that is assigned to provide Services. Issues of discipline or performance will be specifically handled according to COUNTY policies. SECTION NO. 12: LIABILITY (a) The COUNTY shall indemnify and hold harmless the CITY and its officers, agents, and employees, from any and all claims, actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, and damages of any nature whatsoever, by any reason of or arising out of any negligent act or omission of the COUNTY, its officers, agents and employees, relating to or arising out of performing Services pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that any suit based upon such claim, action, loss, or damages is brought against the CITY, the COUNTY shall defend the same at its sole cost and expense; provided that the CITY reserves the right to participate in said suit if any principle of governmental or public law is involved; and if final judgment in said suit be rendered against the CITY, and its officers, agents, and employees, or jointly against the CITY and the COUNTY and their respective officers, agents, and employees, the COUNTY shall satisfy the same. (b) The CITY shall indemnify and hold harmless the COUNTY and its officers, agents, and employees, from any and all claims, actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, and damages of any nature whatsoever, by any reason of or arising out of any negligent act or omission of the CITY, its officers, agents and employees, relating to or arising out of performing Services pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that any suit based upon such claim, action, loss, or damages is brought against the COUNTY, the CITY shall defend the same at its sole cost and expense; provided that the COUNTY reserves the right to participate in said suit if any principle of governmental or public law is involved; and if final judgment in said suit be rendered against the COUNTY, and its officers, agents, and employees, or jointly against the COUNTY and the CITY and their respective officers, agents, and employees, the CITY shall satisfy the same. Page 9 of 22 (c) If the comparative negligence of the Parties and their officers and employees is a cause of such damage or injury, the liability, loss, cost, or expense shall be shared between the Parties in proportion to their relative degree of negligence and the right of indemnity shall apply to such proportion. (d) Where an officer or employee of a Party is acting under the direction and control of the other Party, the Party directing and controlling the officer or employee in the activity and/or omission giving rise to liability shall accept all liability for the other Party's officer or employee's negligence. (e) Each Party's duty to indemnify shall survive the termination or expiration of the Agreement. (f) The foregoing indemnity is specifically intended to constitute a waiver of each Party's immunity under Washington's Industrial Insurance Act, chapter 51 RCW, respecting the other party only, and only to the extent necessary to provide the indemnified Party with a full and complete indemnity of claims made by the indemnitor's employees. The PARTIES acknowledge that these provisions were specifically negotiated and agreed upon by them. (g) The COUNTY and the CITY agree to either self insure or purchase polices of insurance covering the matters contained in this Agreement with coverages of not less than $5,000,000 per occurrence with $5,000,000 aggregate limits including professional liability and auto liability coverages. SECTION NO. 13: RELATIONSHIP OF THE PARTIES The PARTIES intend that an independent contractor relationship will be created by this Agreement. The COUNTY shall be an independent contractor and not the agent or employee of the CITY. The CITY is interested only in the results to be achieved and that the right to control the particular manner, method and means in which the Services are performed is solely within the discretion of the COUNTY. Any and all employees who provide Services to the CITY under this Agreement shall be deemed employees solely of the COUNTY. The COUNTY shall be solely responsible for the conduct and actions of all employees under this Agreement and any liability that may attach thereto. Likewise, no agent, employee, servant or representative of the CITY shall be deemed to be an employee, agent, servant or representative of the COUNTY for any purpose. SECTION NO. 14: MODIFICATION This Agreement may only be modified in writing by mutual written agreement of the PARTIES, and approved by the respective legislative bodies. SECTION NO. 15: PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT The ownership of all property and equipment utilized in conjunction with providing the Services under this Agreement shall remain with the COUNTY unless otherwise specifically and mutually agreed to by the PARTIES. Page 10 of 22 SECTION NO. 16: ALL WRITINGS CONTAINED HEREIN/BINDING EtFECT This Agreement contains terms and conditions agreed upon by the PARTIES. The PARTIES agree that there are no other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement. No changes or additions to this Agreement shall be valid or binding upon the PARTIES unless such change or addition is in writing, executed by the PARTIES. This Agreement shall be binding upon the PAR I'1r,S hereto, their successors and assigns. SECTION NO. 17: DISPUTE RESOLUTION Any dispute between the PARTIES which cannot be resolved between the PARTIES shall be subject to arbitration. Except as provided for to the contrary herein, such dispute shall first be reduced to writing. If the COUNTY CEO and the CITY cannot resolve the dispute it will be submitted to arbitration. The provisions of chapter 7.04 A RCW shall be applicable to any arbitration proceeding. The COUNTY and the CITY shall have the right to designate one person each to act as an arbitrator. The two selected arbitrators shall then jointly select a third arbitrator. The decision of the arbitration panel shall be binding on the PARTIES and shall be subject to judicial review as provided for in chapter 7.04A RCW. The costs of the arbitration panel shall be equally split between the PARTIES. SECTION NO. 18: VENUE STIPULATION This Agreement has been and shall be construed as having been made and delivered within the State of Washington and it is mutually understood and agreed by each party that this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington both as to interpretation and performance. Any action at law, suit in equity or judicial proceeding for the enforcement of this Agreement, or any provision hereto, shall be instituted only in courts of competent jurisdiction within Spokane County, Washington. SECTION NO. 19: SEVERABILITY The PAR I'1ES agree that if any parts, terms or provisions of this Agreement are held by the courts to be illegal, the validity of the remaining portions or provisions shall not be affected and the rights and obligations of the PARTIES shall not be affected in regard to the remainder of the Agreement. If it should appear that any part, term or provision of this Agreement is in conflict with any statutory provision of the State of Washington, then the part, term or provision thereof that may be in conflict shall be deemed inoperative and null and void insofar as it may be in conflict therewith and this Agreement shall be deemed to modify to conform to such statutory provision. Page 11 of 22 SECTION NO. 20: RECORDS All public records prepared, owned, used or retained by the COUNTY in conjunction with providing Services under the terms of this Agreement shall be deemed CITY property and shall be made available to the CITY upon request by the CITY subject to the attorney client and attorney work product privileges set forth in statute, court rule or case law. SECTION NO. 21: HEADING The section headings appearing in this Agreement have been inserted solely for the purpose of convenience and ready reference. In no way do they purport to, and shall not be deemed to define, limit or extend the scope or intent of the sections to which they pertain. SECTION NO. 22: TIME OF ESSENCE OF AGREEMENT Time is of the essence for this Agreement and in case either party fails to perform the obligations on its part to be performed at the time fixed for the performance of the respective obligation by the terms of this Agreement, the other party may, at its election, hold the other party liable for all costs and damages caused by such delay. SECTION NO. 23: UNCONTROLLABLE CIRCUMSTANCES/IMPOSSIBILITY A delay or interruption in or failure of performance of all or any part of this Agreement resulting from Uncontrollable Circumstances shall be deemed not a default under this Agreement. A delay or interruption in or failure of performance of all or any part of this Agreement resulting from any change in or new law, order, rule or regulation of any nature which renders providing of Services in accordance with the terms of this Agreement legally impossible, and any other circumstances beyond the control of the COUNTY which render legally impossible the performance by the COUNTY of its obligations under this Agreement, shall be deemed not a default under this Agreement. SECTION NO. 24: FILING The CITY shall file this Agreement with its City Clerk or, alternatively, place the Agreement on the CITY's website. The COUNTY shall file this Agreement with the County Auditor, or, alternatively, place the Agreement on the COUNTY's web site or other electronically retrievable public source. SECTION NO. 25: EXECUTION AND APPROVAL The PARTIES warrant that the officers executing below have been duly authorized to act for and on behalf of the party for purposes of confirming this Agreement. Page 12 of 22 SECTION NO. 26: COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS The PARTIES shall observe all federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, to the extent that they may be applicable to the terms of this Agreement. SECTION NO. 27: DISCLAIMER Except as otherwise provided, this Agreement shall not be construed in any manner that would limit either party's authority or powers under law. SECTION NO. 28: ANTI -KICKBACK No officer or employee of the CITY, having the power or duty to perform an official act or action related to this Agreement shall have or acquire any interest in the Agreement, or have solicited, accepted or granted a present or future gift, favor, service or other thing of value from or to any person involved in the Agreement, or otherwise violate the requirements of RCW 42.23.030 SECTION NO. 29: NON-DISCRIMINATION No individual shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefit of, subjected to discrimination under, or denied employment in the administration of or in connection with this Agreement in violation of state or federal law. SECTION NO. 30: NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES Nothing in this Agreement is intended to give, or shall give, whether directly or indirectly, any benefit or right, greater than that enjoyed by the general public, to third persons. SECTION NO. 31: ANNUAL REPORT The SCRAPS Director shall prepare annual report. The annual report shall include, among other matters, performance measurements/indicators and a twelve (12) month Activity Study. Performance measurements/indicators will include: • Statistics regarding annual number of pet licenses sold/issued • Annual live release rate — animals returned to owner, adopted and/or transferred to other facilities/rescue groups • Where applicable, industry statistics for the same measures will also be listed for the above two (2) bullets The Activity Study will include monthly statistics regarding: • Requests for service Page 13 of 22 • Emergency calls • Animal impounds • Investigations • Trapping The Activity Study will be sent out monthly as part of the reporting process. SECTION NO. 32: INSURANCE During the term of the Agreement, the COUNTY shall maintain in force at its own expense, each insurance noted below: A. Workers' Compensation Insurance in compliance with RCW 51.12.020, which requires subject employers to provide workers' compensation coverage for all their subject workers and Employer's Liability or Stop Gap Insurance in the amount of $1,000,000; B. General Liability Insurance on an occurrence basis, with a combined single limits of not less than $10,000,000 each occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. It shall include contractual liability coverage for the indemnity provided under this Agreement. It shall provide that the CITY, its officers and employees are additional insureds but only with respect to the COUNTY's services to be provided under this Agreement; and C. Automobile Liability Insurance with a combined single limit, or the equivalent of not less than $15,000,000 each accident for bodily injury and property damage, including coverage for owned, hired and non -owned vehicles. D. Professional Liability Insurance with a combined single limit of not less than $5,000,000 each claim, incident or occurrence. This is to cover damages caused by the error, omission, or negligent acts related to the professional services to be provided under this Agreement. The coverage must remain in effect for two years after the Agreement is completed. There shall be no cancellation, material change, reduction of limits or intent not to renew the insurance coverage(s) without thirty (30) days written notice from the COUNTY or its insurer(s) to the CITY. Written evidence of insurance shall reflect that the insurance afforded therein shall be primary insurance and any insurance or self-insurance carried by the COUNTY shall be excess and not contributory insurance to that provided by the CITY. As evidence of the insurance coverages required by this Agreement, the COUNTY shall furnish acceptable insurance certificates to the CITY at the time it returns the signed Agreement. The certificate shall specify all of the parties who are additional insured; and include applicable policy endorsements, the thirty (30) day cancellation clause, and the deduction or retention level. Insuring companies or entities are subject to CITY acceptance. If requested, complete copies of insurance policies shall be provided to the CITY. The Page 14 of 22 COUNTY shall be financially responsible for all pertinent deductibles, self-insured retentions, and/or self-insurance. SECTION NO. 33: RCW 39.34 REQUIRED CLAUSES A. PURPOSE: See Section No. 3 above. B. DURATION: See Section No. 4 above. C. ORGANIZATION OF SEPARATE ENTITY AND ITS POWERS: No new or separate legal or administrative entity is created to administer the provisions of this Agreement. D. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES: See provisions above. E. AGREEMENT TO BE FILED: See Section No. 24. F. FINANCING: Each party shall be responsible for the financing of its contractual obligations wider its normal budgetary process. G. TERMINATION: See Section No. 4 above. H. PROPERTY UPON TERMINATION: See Section No. 15 above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES have caused this Agreement to be executed on date and year opposite their respective signatures. DATED: / jo243fr,CJ-' ATTEST -Clerk of the Boar BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS P OUN WASHON , Chair Daniela Erickson Page 15 of 22 AL FRENC , Vice -Chairman Kms' 0-044 TODD MIELKE, Commissioner DATED: I 13 City Clerk li-- ./49-t -4`1,ilyivN - Approved as to fo1,,,,,o, F„401_,,,, Cii~v"Atto Y Page 16 of 22 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY ATTACHMENT "1" The COUNTY through the Spokane County Regional Animal Protection Services (SCRAPS) will provide Animal Control Services to the CITY within the CITY's boundaries. The CITY agrees to specially commission any SCRAPS staff which may be necessary for them to carry out such Services so long as such staff meet the requirement(s) necessary for such commission. For the purpose of this Agreement, Animal Control Services shall include: ITEM 1: ITEM 2: ITEM 3: ITEM 4: Enforcement of the CITY'S Animal Control Ordinance presently in effect and/or as hereafter amended by the City consistent with this Agreement; Enforcement of chapter 16.08 RCW (Dogs); Enforcement of chapter 16.52 RCW (Prevention of Cruelty to Animals); and Enforcement of chapter 16.54 RCW (Abandoned Animals). Enforcement includes field services, shelter services, educational services, the licensing of dogs, cats and appearing before all administrative and judicial hearings in conjunction with such duties and functions. FIELD SERVICES Field Services include those provided during normal hours of operation as well as emergency services provided only after normal hours of operation. Normal hours of operation will be determined by the COUNTY after consultation with the Board of Directors. Field Services provided during normal hours of operation include: (1) Dog at large complaints; (2) Cat at large on private property; (3) Dog barking; (4) Dog or cat — no license; (5) Dog or cat — no rabies vaccination; (6) Dog threatens person; (7) Dog threatens domestic animal; (8) Dog or cat bite; (9) Injured dog or cat; (10) Sick dog or cat; (11) Agency assist; (12) Abandoned animal; (13) Animal cruelty; (14) Dead on arrival dog or cat; (15) Confined dog or cat; (16) Trapping dog or cat; (17) Vicious dog; (18) Kennel inspections; (19) Dangerous dog inspections; and (20) Others as deemed necessary by the SCRAPS. Field Services provided after normal hours of operation, referred to as Emergency Services, include: (1) Injured or sick dog/cat; (2) Dog/cat bite — dog/cat is still at large; (3) Dog bite — severe dog bite (victim is in hospital and dog will need to be quarantined immediately in the county shelter); (4) Vicious or threatening dog — dog threatens persons or domestic animals and is still at large; (5) Animal in our humane trap that is making a disturbance or injuring itself; (6) Other law enforcement agency requests for assistance when animals are involved; (7) Other emergencies such as extreme cruelty or pet dying in a hot vehicle; and (8) Multiple calls on same problem — animal control officer on call will evaluate and make a determination on whether to respond. Page 17 of 22 SHELTER SERVICES Shelter Services are provided Monday, Wednesday and Friday from noon to 5:30 p.m.; Tuesday and Thursday from noon to 6:30 p.m.; Saturday and Sunday from noon to 5:30 p.m. closed holidays. Shelter Services include the following: (1) Housing dog/cat — occasional other animal; (2) Pet license program; (3) $ ; (4) Animal redemptions; (5) Adoption program; (6) Volunteer program; (7) Dog training program; (8) Trapping program; and (9) Crematorium. Shelter Services hours may be adjusted by the COUNTY after consultation with the Board of Directors. EDUCATIONAL SERVICES Educational services include: (1) Dog bite prevention program — elementary schools and service workers; (2) School career fair participation; (3) Specialty presentations available upon request; (4) Public service announcements — newspaper, radio and television; (5) Community outreach such as fair booth, license clinics, special events; and (6) Website. The COUNTY may conduct surveys within the CITY for unlicensed dogs and cats. ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE / LICENSES/ FEES / PENALTIES In conjunction with the enforcement of the CITY'S Animal Control Ordinance, the CITY shall adopt and keep current by appropriate legislative action an Animal Control Ordinance substantially identical to that adopted by the COUNTY as it presently exist or as it may hereinafter be modified/amended, to include all licenses/fees/penalties. This responsibility shall not be deemed a restriction upon the CITY's legislative power. The City may enact ordinances dealing with animal control within its boundaries. Provided, further, the CITY may add a surcharge to its license fee ("City License Fee Surcharge".) All revenues from licenses/fees/penalties collected (not including City License Fee Surcharge) shall be retained by SCRAPS and applied to the cost of providing Services. Any such City License Fee Surcharge shall not be retained by SCRAPS. The COUNTY shall remit to the CITY all such City License Fee Surcharges collected under the terms of this Agreement semiannually on or before or before July 31St for the time frame from January 1st through June 30th of each calendar year this Agreement is in effect and January 31St for the time frame from July 1St through December 31St of each year this Agreement is in effect. The COUNTY shall provide the CITY with a copy of its Animal Control Ordinance presently codified in Chapter 5.04 of the Spokane County Code and all subsequent modifications/amendments thereto. The CITY shall provide the COUNTY with copies of its adopted/amended Animal Control Ordinance substantially identical to chapter 5.04 of the Spokane County Code. Page 18 of 22 The CITY shall provide legal counsel to prosecute any citations/complaints issued by COUNTY in enforcement of Items No. 1 through 4 herein above in any court of lawful jurisdiction except if the enforcement constitutes a felony. In performing the above Animal Control Services, the COUNTY will provide such personnel, as it deems necessary as well as any and all vehicles and materials of any kind or nature whatsoever. The COUNTY will provide additional Animal Control Services above and beyond those set forth herein to CITY at cost negotiated between the CITY and the COUNTY. Animal Control Services provided by the COUNTY under the terms of this Agreement, absent subsequent negotiation and agreement will not include: 1. Picking up dead wildlife or livestock on CITY streets, roads or alleys. 2. Providing emergency service for dead animals at any time or for dead dogs/cats after normal hours of operation. 3. Providing traps to the public for wildlife. 4. Responding to calls pertaining to dead or injured wildlife threatening the safety of other animals or the public. 5. Holding licensed dogs/cats in the Regional Animal Control Facility for a period of more than five (5) business days. Provided, at sole discretion of the COUNTY, holding periods may be extended. 6. Holding unlicensed dogs/cats in the Regional Animal Control Facility for a period more than seventy-two (72) hours. Provided, at sole discretion of the COUNTY, holding periods may be extended. 7. Holding any wildlife at the Regional Animal Control Facility. 8. Providing Hearing Examiner Services. CITIZEN COMPLAINT PROCESS • Written complaints may be filed via an email help request or complaint form available on the SCRAPS website or through the mail. Verbal complaints, whether submitted telephonically or in person, shall be documented in writing by SCRAPS staff receiving the complaint. • All complaints will be handled by SCRAPS Management Team within five (5) business days unless the complaint is related to an ongoing active investigation. • Unresolved complaints will be referred to the Board of County Commissioners and will be resolved within ten (10) business days of receiving the complaint from the SCRAPS Management Team. The COUNTY will notify the CITY's representative in writing of the Board of County Commissioners' decision. • The COUNTY will provide the CITY on a monthly basis a report listing any complaints received within the CITY by SCRAPS staff for the preceding month, which shall include at least the following information: Page 19 of 22 o The nature of the customer complaint o The location of the incident o Response times to customer complaints The COUNTY shall work with the CITY to develop a system for mapping the locations of any complaints received. SERVICE GOALS • Emergency/high priority calls responded to within 24 hours — immediate response when a person and/or animal is at immediate risk (safety/health). • Routine calls responded to within 48 hours — nuisance calls such as barking, dogs not on a leash, etc. • Licensed/identified animals impounded by animal protection officer in field will be returned directly to the owner if someone is home to receive the animal. Otherwise owner will be notified via phone and mail that their animal was impounded within 24 hours of impounding. • Dedicated emergency phone line — no voice mail. All emergency calls for service will be answered by a person — either SCRAPS staff or answering service. • Convenience for citizen with online pet licensing (new/renewal) and online request for service option. • Current list of impounded animals updated every two hours on website — helpful for owners who are missing their pet. • Animal Protection Officers have 24/7 access to pet license data and animal control records via laptops in the field. • All impounded animals scanned for a microchip at the time of impound, given a health exam and vaccinated (unless vicious and threatening safety of staff). • All SCRAPS staff are trained in customer service through the Spokane County Training Program and are required to follow the Spokane County Behavioral Standards. SCRAPS STANDARDS • Guidelines for Standards of Care in Animal Shelters published by The Association of Shelter Veterinarians 2010 - the guidelines were developed to provide a tool that would allow communities and animal welfare organizations, to identify minimum standards of care, as well as best and unacceptable practices. • Animal Control Management A Guide for Local Governments published by the Humane Society of the United States — a guide to establish effective animal care and control Page 20 of 22 • National Animal Control Association Training Guide — a guide to training today's professional animal control officer • American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Professionals website — animal welfare tools and resources Any CITY concern for nonperformance shall be forwarded to the SCRAPS Board of Directors for consideration at their next scheduled meeting. Failure to resolve the CITY's concern by the SCRAPS Board of Directors at their next scheduled meeting shall result in the concern being immediately forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners for resolution. If the CITY is not satisfied by the decision of the Board of County Commissioners, it may resolve the issue pursuant to SECTION No. 17. Page 21 of 22 ATTACHMENT "2" Copy of U. S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS CPI (ON FOLLOWING PAGE) Page 22 of 22 la :D,B'Aftm' 1 NTC OF LABOR, BU.IU3AU OF LABOR STATISTICS Western Information Office, 90 7th St., Suite 14-100, San Francisco, CA 94103 Information Staff(415) 625-2270 / Fax (415) 625-2351 WEST • Size Class SIC 05/11/12 Consumer Price Index, All Items, December 1996=100 for All Urban Consumers (CPI -1.1), YEAR JAN FEB MARCH 1993 1994 1995 1996 1897 100.4 1998 102.3 1999 103.6 2000 105.7 2001 109.8 2002 111.9 2003 113.8 2004 116.0 2005 119.5 2006 122.9 2007 126.2 2008 131.328 2009 130.682 2010 133.366 133.513 133.863 2011 134.917 135.826 137.200 2012 138.465 138.997 140.235 Table of over -the -year percent increa APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC 100.8 101.2 101.4 101.5 101.3 101.3 101.5 101.8 102.1 102.4 102.3 102.3 102.2 102.4 102.3 102.3 102.5 102.7 103.0 103.5 103.8 104.1 105.1 104.8 104.5 104.9 105.2 105.2 105.5 105.5 106.2 107.1 107.2 107.3 107.7 108.1 108.3 108.8 109.0 109.2 110.1 110.7 110.6 111.1 111.2 111.4 111.2 111.7 112.1 112.0 112.4 112.8 113.7 112.5 112.2 112.5 113.0 113.1 113.3 113.1 114.5 115.4 114.9 114.7 114.4 115.1 115.5 115.6 115.5 114.9 117.0 117.9 117.8 118.2 117.9 117.9 118.1 118.4 119.2 119.3 119.8 120.4 121.4 121.3 121.1 121.3 122.0 123.1 123.6 122.8 123.7 124.2 124.9 125.7 125.6 125.6 126.2 125.9 125.5 125.1 126.8 127.8 128.8 129.1 129.3 129.1 128.9 129.1 129.9 130.6 131.538 132.896 133.694 134.023 135.283 136.021 135.207 134.834 133.795 131.440 131.636 131.775 131.912 131.990 132.952 132.774 132.756 133.128 133.618 133.335 134.133 133.889 133.635 133.685 133.704 133.544 133.745 133.930 138.174 138.598 138.269 138.128 138.171 138.564 138.696 138.411 140.619 ses. An entry for Feb. 2006 indicates the percentage increase from Feb. 2005 to Feb. 2008. 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 1.9 1.5 1.1 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.8 2.3 2.2 2.5 2.6 2.4 2.4 1.9 2.0 2.3 2.9 2.0 2.4 3.1 3.1 2.9 3.4 3.3 3.5 3.9 3.7 3.4 3.2 3.5 3.2 3.1 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.6 1.9 2.1 1.9 2.8 1,3 0.9 1.0 1.6 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.7 1.9 2.3 1.1 2.0 2.0 2.3 2.2 2.2 1.9 1.6 1.9 2.2 2.2 2.5 3.1 3.1 2.4 '2.3 2.4 3.2 3.8 3.0 2.2 2.1 3.1 2.6 2.7 . 2.9 3.3 4.0 3.7 2.9 2.8 3.4 3.2 2.9 3.6 3.7 3.5 3.4 2.3 1.5 1.9 2.7 2.5 2.9 3.2 2.7 2.9 2.8 2.2 2.5 3.5 4.4 4.0 3.7 3.9 3.8 3.8 4.7 5.4 4.9 4.5 3.0 0.7 -0.5 0.1 -0.8 -1.3 -1.5 -1.7 -2.4 -1.8 -1.3 -0.1 1.4 2.1 1.4 1.6 1.7 1.4 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.4 1,2 1.7 2.5 3.0 3.5 3.5 3.3 3.3 3.8 3.7 3.3 2.6 2.3 2.2 1.8 100.0 102.0 103.4 105.7 108.9 111.6 113.1 115.2 119.0 121.8 125.0 130.5 129.725 133.132 134.328 138.017 2.0 1.4 2.2 3.0 2.5 1.3 1.9 3.3 2.4 2.6 4.4 -0.6 2.6 0.9 2.7 ATTACHMENT "3" With City of Spokane (Not including "other" Revenue) Estimated Percent of Services based on 2010 Activity Study (Excluding Investigation) Cost Spokane County 23.84% $258,914 Spokane Valley 22.29% $242,081 Millwood 0.43% $ 4,670 Cheney 0.96% $ 10,426 Liberty Lake 0.78% $ 8,471 City of Spokane 51.70% $561,488 TOTAL: 100% $1,086,050 ATTACHMENT "4" Without City of Spokane (Not including "other" Revenue Estimated Percent of Services based on 2010 Activity Study (Excluding Investigation) Cost Spokane County 49.36% $258,912 Spokane Valley 46.16% $242,079 Millwood 0.88% $ 4,670 Cheney 1.98% $ 10,426 Liberty Lake 1.62% $ 8,471 TOTAL: 100% $524,558 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: February 23, 2016 Check all that apply: ['consent ❑ old business ['information ® admin. report Department Director Approval: ['new business ['public hearing ['pending legislation ['executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Administrative report — Discussion on removal of snow and ice from public sidewalks. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 7.05.040(C). PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adoption of nuisance provisions in 2003, amended over the years, most recently in 2012. BACKGROUND: Questions have arisen regarding what options the City has with regard to getting public sidewalks cleared of accumulations of snow and ice. The accompanying PowerPoint presentation is a general discussion on the various aspects of this issue. Following Council discussion and direction, staff will identify a future action plan for further Council discussion. This incremental approach is likely to take several meetings as the Council and staff discuss various options. OPTIONS: NA. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: NA. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Unknown. STAFF CONTACT: Cary P. Driskell, City Attorney ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint presentation discussing options. SNOW AND ICE ON SIDEWALKS - DISCUSSION POINTS Cary Driskell City Attorney, City of Spokane Valley Erik Lamb Deputy City Attorney, City of Spokane Valley February 23, 2016 City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney i Broad topic discussion tonight The City has an interest in having snow and ice removed from public sidewalks. We are raising this now so we can address this early and then implement any changes well in advance of the next snow season. Accumulations of snow and ice can make pedestrian use of sidewalks difficult, including use of assistive -mobility devices. Accumulations of snow and ice on sidewalks can significantly limit access to businesses, affecting their profitability. City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney Types of accumulations of snow and ice 1. Natural accumulations. These result from snowfall and the normal freezing that occurs in winter. 2. Accumulations from other sources. These result from activities such as snow plowing by City crews, or plowing by private contractors from parking lots onto public sidewalks. City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney Responsibility for removal Every jurisdiction I could find places responsibility for removal of snow and ice from sidewalks on the adjoining property owner, which includes snow and ice deposited by city snow plows. Doing so is within a city's authority under the police powers pursuant to the Washington State Constitution, Article ii, Section ii, and pursuant to RCW 35A.ii.o2o (powers vested in legislative bodies of non -charter and charter code cities). Spokane Valley already places this responsibility on adjoining property owner pursuant to SVMC 7.o5.o4o(C) as a nuisance. As discussed below, this has not been wholly effective in addressing this issue. City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney SVMC 7.05.040(C) SVMC 7.05.040 states as follows: No person, firm, or entity shall erect, contrive, cause, continue, maintain, or permit to exist any public nuisances within the City, including any public rights-of-way abutting a person, firm, or entity's property. Prohibited public nuisances include, but are not limited to: (C) Sidewalks: 3. Snow or ice not removed from a public sidewalk within a reasonable time. City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney Treating snow and ice as a nuisance Addressing snow and ice removal from sidewalks through the nuisance code seemed to be a logical approach, and the City has increased its use of this over the past year, but it has not proven as effective as we would have liked. It is not written for these types of conditions. Snow and ice to be removed "within a reasonable time". Self -abatement process for any nuisance allows up to 3o days. Civil penalties associated with a nuisance violation are $500 per event, which is not proportionate with this type of violation. City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney Consider using infraction citation An enforcement option that various jurisdictions use is to issue a civil infraction, which is then handled in District Court like a speeding ticket. If this option is chosen, we could classify a violation as a Class 4 infraction, the lowest level under Washington's infraction system, and carries a base penalty of $25, plus mandatory court costs of 1o5% of the base penalty, totaling $51.25. A repeat violation (for instance within 12 months) could result in the same penalty, or categorize any additional violations as a Class 3 infraction ($5o base, $52.5o costs = $io2.5o total). City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney Alternatives for enforcement - summary Continue using SVMC 7.05.o4o(C). 2. Implement infraction system with chosen infraction level. City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney 8 Educational program Regardless of the approach adopted, the City will want to continue to broadly distribute an educational program to inform residents and businesses of what the expectations are, including why it is important to comply. City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney Existing educational program Annual letter to all registered Spokane Valley businesses Brochures distributed at i6 community locations Included in all SnowInfo updates sent to Media Release and SnowInfo email lists Distributed via RSS feed Included in recorded SnowInfo line message Posted to website City News and Snowlnfo pages Featured in Winter HotTopic newsletter mailed City-wide Covered by print, broadcast and online media '�Aokane K dspfoalk°cue�co om s . Unit),Gsines k"eP siJpq to th y_ o. ' as(Xj or o, IS're bark lth� pa rm tts. afj/e4d p akY� CITY OF SPODE V Lore appreciation try rvt St 4s/ City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney Mikes Additional considerations The City will want to clearly communicate several additional things: Snow and ice deposited on public sidewalks by City snow plows is the responsibility of the adjoining property owner to remove. This is unquestionably unpleasant, but the adjoining property owner is in the best position by far to perform this task both from the standpoint of physical location and timeliness. It is a safety hazard and illegal to move snow from sidewalks, private driveways, and private parking lots onto the roadway, which can in certain circumstances result in a criminal charge under state and local law. City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney Council discussion At this point, staff is interested to hear what discussion the Council has on the issues raised in tonight's presentation. After considering those discussions, staff will begin to put together more refined options for additional Council discussion, including citizen input. City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney To: From: Re: DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA as of February 18, 2016; 9:00 a.m. Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative Council & Staff City Clerk, by direction of City Manager Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings March 1, 2016, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Feb 22] 1. Accomplishments Report (Legislative & Executive, Ops & Admin; Public Safety; Parks & Rec; Community & Economic Development, and Public Works) — Mike Jackson (90 minutes) 2. Code Text Amendment -Administrative Exceptions — Lori Barlow, Christina Janssen 3. CDBG (Com. Dev.Block Grant) 2016 Funding, Blake Sidewalk — Deputy Mayor Woodard 4. Public Safety Oversight/Advisory Committee — Councilmember Pace 5. Advance Agenda Mayor Higgins (20 minutes) (10 minutes) (30 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 155 minutes] March 8, 2016, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Motion Consideration: Bid Award, 32nd Ave Preservation Project — Steve Worley 3. Admin Report: 2016 LTGO Bond Ordinance (City Hall) — Mark Calhoun 4. Admin Report: Retail Improvement Study — John Hohman, CAI 5. Admin Report: Tourism Enhancement Study — John Hohman, CAI 6. Admin Report: Spokane Regional Law & Justice Commission Update — Cary Driskell 7. Admin Report: Uncovered/unsecured loads — Erik Lamb 8. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins [due Mon, Feb 29] (5 minutes) (10 minutes) (20 minutes) (25 minutes) (25 minutes) (25 minutes) (15 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 130 minutes] March 15, 2016, Workshop, 8:30 a.m.- 4:30 p.m. (no evening mtg) Council Chambers [due Mon, Mar 7] March 22, 2016, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. First Reading 2016 LTGO Bond Ordinance (City Hall) — Mark Calhoun 3. Admin Report: Solid Waste Collection — Eric Guth, Morgan Koudelka, Erik Lamb 4. Drug Enforcement Update — Rick VanLeuven 5. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins [due Mon, Mar 14] (5 minutes) (20 minutes) (25 minutes) (20 minutes) (5 minutes) 6. Info Only: (a) Dept Reports; (b) WSDOT Call for Projects (Bicycles, and Safe Rts to School) [*estimated meeting: 75 minutes] March 29, 2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due 1. Fire /Police Depts Rescue Task Force — Captain Chris Cornelius & Chief Rick VanLeuven 2. WSDOT Call for Projects (Bicycles, and Safe Rts to School) — Eric Guth 3. Comp Plan Goals and Policies Discussion — Lori Barlow 4. Comp Plan Water Rights/Districts Discussion — Adam Jackson 5. City Hall Update — John Hohman 6. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins April 5, 2016, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Comp Plan Tiny Homes Discussion — Micki Harnois 2. Port District Update — John Hohman 3. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins Mon, Mar 21] (30 minutes) (15 minutes) (60 minutes) (20 minutes) (15 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 145 minutes] [due Mon, Mar 28] (15 minutes) (15 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 35 minutes] Draft Advance Agenda 2/18/2016 3:44:43 PM Page 1 of 2 April 12, 2016, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: WSDOT Call for Projects — Eric Guth 2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 3. Motion Consideration: Approval of WSDOT Call for Projects — Eric Guth 4. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins April 19, 2016, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins [due Mon, Apr 4] (10 minutes) (5 minutes) (10 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 30 minutes] April 26, 2016, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Second Reading 2016 LTGO Bond Ordinance (City Hall) — Mark Calhoun 3. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins 4. Info Only: Department Reports May 3, 2016, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins May 10, 2016, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins May 17, 2016, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins May 24, 2016, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins 3. Info Only: Department Reports May 31, 2016, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins June 7, 2016, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins June 14, 2016, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins *time for public or Council comments not included OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: Avista Electrical Franchise AWC Conference (June 21-24) Blake Street Sidewalk (CDBG) Domestic Violence Advocacy (Police) Economic Development Marketing Plan Emergency Preparedness Greenhouse Gas Emissions Policy [due Mon, Apr 11] (5 minutes) [due Mon, Apr 18] (5 minutes) (10 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 20 minutes] [due Mon, Apr 25] (5 minutes) [due Mon, May 2] (5 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Mon, May 9] (5 minutes) [due Mon, May 16] (5 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Mon, May 23 (5 minutes) [due Fri, May 27] (5 minutes) [due Mon, June 6] (5 minutes) (5 minutes) Intelligence -led policing Ord 15-023 Marijuana Ext/Renew (expires 6/9/16) Ord 16-003 Mining Ext (expires 8/21/16) Pavement Preservation SRTMC Agreement (June/July 2016) TIP 2017-2022 (May/June) Draft Advance Agenda 2/18/2016 3:44:43 PM Page 2 of 2 Spokane ..+ric Valley City of Spokane Valley Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2016 - 01/31/2016 Page Title 1 Cover Sheet 2 Pre -Application Meetings Requested 3 Online Applications Received 4 Construction Applications Received 5 Land Use Applications Received 6 Construction Permits Issued 7 Land Use Applications Approved 8 Development Inspections Performed 9 Code Enforcement 10 Revenue 11 Building Permit Valuations Printed 02/01/2016 07:34 Page 1 of 11 Spokane .000 Valley Pre -Application Meetings Requested Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2016 - 01/31/2016 A Pre -Application Meeting is a service provided to help our customers identify the code requirements related to their project proposal. Community Development scheduled a total of 11 Pre -Application Meetings in January 2016. �I,+Uili�;l,lib�;l,lib�;l���11,�2�(;1ib�;l,lil��;l,lib�;l,lib�;l�iJ,U'�i�9�r,X41/,fv��l�'1,,,lib�;l,lib�;l�Wl/ih;l„/4�PffliPtfJf�PffliPrfJiltfPfitrfJfltfPfilUliii Stu tl�X Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial Pre -App Land Use Pre -Application Meeting Monthly Totals Annual Total To -Date: 11 Land Use Pre -Application Commercial Pre -App Meeting Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Se 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oct Nov Dec 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Printed 02/01/2016 07:34 Page 2 of 11 Spokan' ems``` 41111.y Online Applications Received Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2016 - 01/31/2016 Community Development received a total of 105 Online Applications in January 2016. 150 100 50 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Trade Permit Sign Permit Right of Way Permit Reroof Permit Pre -Application Meeting Request Demolition Permit Other Online Applications Approach Permit Approach Permit Demolition Permit Other Online Applications Pre -Application Meeting Request Reroof Permit Right of Way Permit Sign Permit Trade Permit Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 105 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 02/01/2016 07:34 105 Page 3 of 11 Spokan' ems``` 41111.y Construction Applications Received Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2016 - 01/31/2016 Community Development received a total of 329 Construction Applications in January 2016. 400 2.00 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial - New ELII Commercial - TI Residential - New ® Other Construction Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial - New Commercial - TI Residential - New Commercial - Trade Residential - Trade Residential - Accessory Demolition Sign Other Construction Permits 4 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *109 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *144 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 329 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 02/01/2016 07:36 329 Page 4 of 11 *Includes Online Applications. Spokane ....IF Valley Land Use Applications Received Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2016 - 01/31/2016 Community Development received a total of 33 Land Use Applications in January 2016. 40 20 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary gm Long Plat Preliminary Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary Long Plat Preliminary Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits Monthly Totals Annual Total To -Date: Printed 02/01/2016 07:36 33 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 Page 5 of 11 L Spokane 4,00.0 Valley Construction Permits Issued Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2016 - 01/31/2016 Community Development issued a total of 296 Construction Permits in January 2016. 400 200 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial - New Commercial - TI Residential - New ® Other Construction Permits Commercial - New Commercial - TI Residential - New Commercial - Trade Residential - Trade Residential - Accessory Demolition Sign Other Construction Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 296 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 02/01/2016 07:36 296 Page 6 of 11 Spokane ....IF Valley Land Use Applications Approved Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2016 - 01/31/2016 Community Development approved a total of 29 Land Use Applications in January 2016. 40 20 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary gm Long Plat Preliminary Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary Long Plat Preliminary Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits Monthly Totals Annual Total To -Date: Printed 02/01/2016 07:36 29 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 7 of 11 Spokane .000 Valley. Development Inspections Performed Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2016 - 01/31/2016 Community Development performed a total of 758 Development Inspections in January 2016. Development Inspections include building, planning, engineering and ROW inspections. 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014 2015 2016 Jan Fe Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 758 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 801 974 1,063 1,241 1,421 1,756 1,626 1,146 1,053 1,058 934 777 601 633 996 1,281 1,322 1,295 1,414 1,225 1,311 1,481 971 1,027 0 0 Printed 02/01/2016 07:37 Page 8 of 11 Totals Spokane ...sic Valley Code Enforcement Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2016 - 01/31/2016 Code Enforcement Officers responded to 18 citizen requests in the month of January. They are listed by type below. Please remember that all complaints, even those that have no violation, must be investigated. 20 10 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Complaint, Non -Violation Environmental General Nuisance Mi Property Complaint, Non -Violation Environmental General Nuisance Property Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To -Date: 18 Printed 02/01/2016 07:37 Page 9 of 11 Spokane 1_..0 Valley Revenue 2016 Trend 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 Community Development Revenue totaled $213,319 in January 2016. 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2016 - 01/31/2016 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -•- 2016 2015 - Five -Year Trend Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 1 Nov $213,319 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $77,272 $72,713 $144,159 $149,274 $188,707 $202,096 $153,853 $116,015 $132,681 $131,066 $97,315 $75,414 $1,540,565 $74,775 $108,328 $161,174 $187,199 $123,918 $117,453 $162,551 $162,864 $99,587 $181,791 $99,627 $102,195 $1,581,462 $74,628 $66,134 $198,571 $160,508 $282,086 $152,637 $117,776 $127,540 $153,838 $149,197 $84,442 $97,689 $1,665,046 $158,912 $51,536 $102,538 $106,496 $184,176 $409,592 $277,553 $102,021 $129,174 $133,561 $98,386 $66,559 $1,820,504 $34,204 $60,319 $177,737 $173,932 $268,672 $223,888 $123,137 $103,703 $113,731 $112,542 $108,948 $51,745 $43,842 $77,247 $80,774 $118,237 $84,684 $106,909 $88,247 $83,949 $167,076 $78,237 $95,172 $58,881 Dec $0 Totals 19 Printed 02/01/2016 07:37 Page 10 of 11 1,552,558 Spokane .Valley Building Permit Valuation 2016 Trend 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2016 - 01/31/2016 Community Development Building Permit Valuation totaled $7,958,420 in January 2016. 20, 000, 000 15,000,000 10, 000, 000 5,000,000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -+•- 2016 2015 Five -Year Trend Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals $7.96M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $7.96M $6.76M $4.80M $6.38M $9.26M $18.09M $18.98M $11.21M $7.48M $10.66M $9.92M $4.89M $3.48M 111.90M $2.93M $10.71M $8.07M $18.60M $6.73M $7.53M $5.05M $8.06M $5.15M $14.42M $5.86M $5.07M $98.18M $3.18M $2.45M $9.90M $8.92M $34.58M $7.44M $6.37M $9.47M $12.01M $7.74M $3.60M $6.30M '. 111.96M $25.49M $1.92M $3.59M $7.30M $22.22M $41.88M $32.91M $6.52M $8.11M $14.22M $7.25M $2.54M ' 173.95M'' $0.72M $2.95M $5.29M $5.32M $24.39M $33.08M $7.91M $9.89M $6.47M $8.78M $3.76M $1.66M p110.22M'. $1.46M $5.95M $5.03M $6.15M $2.53M $4.98M $3.83M $3.45M $21.54M $4.46M $3.97M $1.85M Printed 02/01/2016 07:37 Page 11 of 11 S6k!;s%U.. Valley 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 + Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 i Fax: 509.921.1008 $ eityhall®spokanevalley.org Memorandum To: Mike Jackson, City Manager From: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director 6 ci Date: February 17, 2016 Re Finance Department Activity Report — January 2016 Following is information pertaining to Finance Department activities through the end of January 2016 and included herein is an updated 2015 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures through the end of December. For the next couple of months we'll focus our financial analysis on 2015 rather than 2016 because "how" 2015 wraps up will largely guide our decision making process as we progress towards the 2017 Budget development process. 2015 Yearend Process January of any year involves the process of shutting down one year and getting started on another. The workload includes processing separate batches of invoices related to either 2015 or 2016 and ultimately issuing 10995 to the variety of vendors from whom we make purchases throughout the year. Payroll work includes setting up new wage, health insurance and tax rates for 2016 and issuing W -2s for 2015. January is also when we begin the work of dosing the books for 2015 and we hope to have this process complete by the end of March. This process typically continues through March because we continue to receive additional information pertaining to both revenues and expenditures (particularly construction related activity). Following the closing of the books we will begin the process of preparing our annual financial report which will be finished by the end of May. We hope to have the State Auditor's Office on site by early June to begin the audit of 2015. Budget to Actual Comparison Report A report reflecting 2015 Budget to Actual Revenues and Expenditures for those funds for which a 2015 Budget was adopted (and amended on October 27) is located on pages 5 through 18. it`s important to keep in mind that the figures included are preliminary and we anticipate they will continue to change as a result of the fact we continue to receive invoices related to 2015 expenditure activity as well as some additional revenues. We will follow-up with Final 2015 figures once the books are closed. We've included the following information in the report: • Revenues by source for all funds, and expenditures by department in the General Fund and by type in all other funds. • A breakdown between recurring and nonrecurring revenues and expenditures in the General Fund, Street O&M Fund and Stormwater Fund. • The change in fund balance including beginning and ending figures. The beginning fund balance figures are those that were reflected in our 2014 Annual Financial Report. P:IFinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201612015 01 31 - 2015 12 PRELIMINARY No 2.docx Page 1 • Columns of information include: fl The amended 2015 Budget as adopted. a December 2015 activity. o Cumulative 2015 activity through December 2015. o Budget remaining in terms of dollars. o The percent of budgeted revenue collected or budgeted expenditures disbursed. A few points related to the General Fund #001 (page 5): Recurring revenues collections are currently at 102.60% of the amount budgeted with 100.00% of the year elapsed. • Property tax collections have reached 11,280,147 or 100.03% of the amount budgeted. Receiving more revenue than wan actually assessed is a result of the assessor collecting delinquent taxes from previous years. property taxes are paid to Spokane County in two installments each year on April 30 and October 31 and are then remitted to the City primarily in May and November with lesser amounts typically remitted in June and December. In January we received one final payment related to 2015 collections that is reflected herein. • Sales tax collections finished the year at $18,209,568 which was $581,168 or 3.30% greater than the amount budgeted. • Gambling taxes are at $334,769 or 75.08% of the amount budgeted. Gambling taxes are paid quarterly with fourth quarter payments due by January 31. At this point we've not received and booked all 2015 revenues, but once received we anticipate that 2015 revenues will approximate budgeted amounts. Effective July 1, 2015, the gambling tax rate on card games was reduced from 10% to 6%. • Franchise Fee and Business Registration revenues are typically received in the month following a calendar year quarter. These revenues reached $1,210,692 which was $64,692 or 5.65% greater than the amount budgeted. • State shared revenues are composed of State of Washington distributions that include items such as liquor board profits, liquor excise tax, streamlined sales tax mitigation and criminal justice monies. Most of these revenues are paid by the State in the month following a calendar quarter. These have collectively finished the year at $2,011,629 which is $242,729 or 13.72% greater than the amount budgeted. The balance in excess of the budgeted amount is primarily due to shared liquor revenues that were restored during the 2015 State Legislative session as well as shared marijuana taxes. • Fines and forfeitures revenues are composed of monthly remittances from Spokane County with payments made in the month following the actual assessment of a fine and false alarm fees. These have finished the year at $1,360,910 or $146,190 or (9.7%) less than the amount budgeted. • Community Development service revenues are largely composed of building permit and plan review fees as well as right of way permits. These revenues finished the year at $1,479,949 which is $154,849 or 11.69% greater than the amount budgeted. • Recreation program fees are composed of revenues generated by the variety of parks and recreation programs including classes, swimming pools (in -season), and CenterPlace. They have finished the year at $659,156 which is $95,656 or 16.98% greater than the amount budgeted. Recurring expenditures are currently at 94.88% of the amount budgeted with 100.00% of the year elapsed. Investments (page 19) P:IFinancelFinance Activity ReportslCouncil Monthly Reports1201612015 Of 31 - 2015 12 PRELIMINARY No 2.docx Page 2 Investments at December 31 total $48,512,577 and are composed of $43,506,574 in the Washington State Local Government Investment Pool and $5,006,003 in bank CDs. Total Sales Tax Receipts (page 20) Total sales tax receipts reflect State remittances through December and total $20,581,821 including general, criminal justice and public safety taxes. This figure is $874,145 or 4.44% greater than the same 12 -month period in 2014. Economic Indicators (pages 21 — 23) The following economic indicators provide information pertaining to three different sources of tax revenue that provide a good gauge of the health and direction of the overall economy. 1. Sales taxes (page 21) provide a sense of how much individuals and businesses are spending on the purchase of goods. 2. Hotel / Motel taxes (page 22) provide us with a sense of overnight stays and visits to our area by tourists or business travelers. 3. Real Estate Excise taxes (page 23) provide us with a sense of real estate safes. Page 21 provides a 10 -year history of general sales tax receipts (not including public safety or criminal justice) with monthly detail beginning January 2006. • Compared with calendar year 2014, 2015 collections have increased by $769,485 or 4.41%. • Tax receipts reached an all-time high in 2015 at $18,209,568, besting the previous record year of 2014 when $17,440,083 was collected. Page 22 provides a 10 -year history of hotel/motel tax receipts with monthly detail beginning January 2006. • Compared with calendar year 2014, 2015 collections have increased by $31,969 or 5.82%. • Collections reached an ail -time high in 2015 of $581,237, exceeding the previous high set in 2014 of $549,267. Page 23 provides a 10 -year history of real estate excise tax receipts with monthly detail beginning January 2006. • Compared with calendar year 2014, 2015 collections have increased by $564,149 or 35.99%. This increase is unusually high due to a state remittance of real estate excise tax of greater than $100,000 that is included in the April 2015 activity and an unusually high amount received in June 2015 (nearly $350,000 as compared to under $150,000 in the several years prior for that month). • Tax receipts peaked in 2007 at nearly $2.6 million, decreased precipitously in 2008 and 2009, and are slowly gaining ground. Debt Capacity and Bonds Outstanding (page 24) This page provides information on the City's debt capacity, or the dollar amount of General Obligation (G.O.) Bonds the City may issue, as well as an amortization schedule of the bonds the City currently has outstanding. • The maximum amount of G.O. bonds the City may issue is determined by the assessed value far property taxes which for 2016 is $7,748,275,097. Following the December 1, 2015, debt service payment the City has $6,375,000 of nonvoted G.O. bonds outstanding which represents 5.49% of our nonvoted bond capacity, and 1.10% of our total debt capacity for all types of bonds. Of this amount: o $5,250,000 remains on bonds issued for the construction of CenterPlace. These bonds are repaid with a portion of the 1/10 of 1% sales tax that is collected by the Spokane Public Facilities District. P:1Finance\Finance Activity ReportslCouncil Monthly Reports1201612015 01 31 - 2015 12 PRELIMINARY No 2.docx Page 3 o $1,125,000 remains on bonds issued for road and street improvements around CenterPlace. The bonds are repaid with a portion of the real estate excise tax collected by the City. Street Fund Revenue Sources (pages 25 and 26) The last two charts reflect a history for the two primary sources of revenue in Street Fund #101. These include: • Page 25 provides a 10 -year history of Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax collections with monthly detail beginning January 2006. o Compared with calendar year 2014, 2015 collections have increased by $65,318 or 3.48%. The increase is due primarily to increased motor vehicle fuel taxes that were approved by the State Legislature in 2015 and were effective beginning in August 2015. ❑ Tax receipts peaked in 2007 at just approximately $2.1 million, and subsequently decreased to a range of approximately $1,857,000 to $1,940,000 in the years 2011 through 2015. • Page 26 provides a 6 -year history of Telephone Utility Tax collections with monthly detail beginning January 2009 (the month in which the tax was imposed), ❑ Compared with 2014, 2015 collections have decreased $203,877 or 8.28%. o Tax receipts peaked in 2009 at $3,054,473 and have decreased each year since due to what we suspect is the reduction in land lines by individual households. ❑ The 2016 Budget was adopted with a revenue estimate of $2,340,000. We will watch this closely as we progress through the coming months. P:LFinancelFinance Activity ReportslCouncil Monthly Reportsl201612015 01 31 - 2015 12 PRELIMINARY No 2,docx Page 4 P: 1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports201612015 12 31 - 2015 12 PRELIMINARY No 2,xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2015 #001 - GENERAL FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Budget Year Elapsed = 2015 100.o% 2015 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget December December 31 Remaining % of Budget Revenues Property Tax 11,277,100 Sales Tax 17,628,400 Sales Tax - Criminal Justice 1,468,700 Sales Tax - Public Safety 820,100 Gambling Tax and Leasehold Excise Tax 445,900 Franchise Fees/Business Registration 1,146,000 State Shared Revenues 1,768,900 Fines, Forfeitures and Penalties 1.507,100 Community Development 1,325,100 Recreation Program Fees 563,500 Miscellaneous Department Revenue 95,900 Miscellaneous & Investment Interest 131,200 Transfer -in - #101 (street admin) 39.700 Transfer -in - #105 (him tax -CP advertising) 30.000 Transfer -in - #402 (storm admin) 13,400 760,029 11,280,147 3,047 100.03% 2,929,528 18.209.568 581.168 103.30% 249,564 1,523,588 54,888 103.74% 138,782 848.665 28,565 103.48% 3,129 334,769 (111,131) 75.08% 298,225 1,210,692 64,692 105.65% 538,213 2,011,629 242,729 113.72% 196,488 1,360,910 (146,190) 90.30% 108,748 1,479, 949 154,849 111.69% 41,670 659,156 95,656 116.98% 5,173 112,232 16,332 117.03% 25,039 140,919 9,719 107.41% 3,308 39,700 (0) 100.00% 30,000 30,000 0 100,00% 1,117 13,400 0 100.00% Total Recurring Revenues 38,261,000 5,329.014 39.255,323 994,323 102.60% Expenditures City Council 513,114 28,888 367,280 145.834 71.58% City Manager 688,363 67.805 665,170 23,193 96.63% Legal 461,839 44,723 458,766 3,073 99.33% Public Safety 24,153,492 2,332,144 23,338,673 814,819 96.63% Deputy City Manager 691,303 73,970 672,801 18,502 97.32% Finance / IT 1,203,879 91.837 1.062.292 141,587 88.24% Human Resources 243,317 20,389 235,600 7,717 96.83% Public Works 921,914 64,524 738.727 183,187 80.13% Community Development - Administration 261,094 20,162 250,570 10,524 95.97% Community Development - Econ Dev 298,276 24,081 238,902 59,374 80.09% Community Development - Dev Svc 1.424,944 135,791 1,385.124 39,820 97.21% Community Development - Building 1,380,902 103,925 1,193,446 187,456 86.43% Parks & Rec- Administration 271,372 20,024 261,255 10,117 96.27% Parks & Rec- Maintenance 844,642 131,144 834,344 10,298 98,78% Parks & Rec - Recreation 226,174 18,338 237,342 (11,168) 104.94% Parks 8, Rec - Aquatics 496,200 4,783 488,288 7,912 98.41% Parks & Rec - Senior Center 91,985 7,771 85,376 6,609 92.81% Parks 8, Rec - CenterPlace 824,997 86,781 811,547 13,450 98.37% Pavement Preservation 920.000 76,667 920,000 (0) 100.00% General Government 1,710,200 317,728 1,422,409 287,791 83.17% Transfers out - #502 (insurance premium) 325,000 27,083 325,000 0 100.00% Transfers out - #310 (bond pmt>$434, S tease pr 67,600 5,633 67,600 0 100.00% Transfers out - #310 (city half o&m costs) 271.700 22,642 271,700 0 100.00% Total Recurring Expenditures 38,292,307 3,726,834 36,332,210 1,960,097 94.88% Recurring Revenues Over (Under) Recurring Expenditures (31,307) 1,602.180 2,923,113 2,954,420 Page 5 P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201612015 12 31 - 2015 12 PRELIMINARY No 2.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2015 #001 - GENERAL FUND - continued NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Budget Year Elapsed = 2015 100.0% 2015 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget December December 31 Remaining % of Budget Revenues Transfers in - #106 (Repymt of Solid Waste) 40,425 0 40,425 0 100.00% Total Nonrecurring Revenues 40,425 0 40,425 0 100.00% Expenditures Transfers out - #309 (park grant match) 115,575 8,333 115,575 0 100.00°Io Transfers out - #107 (move PEG cash) 267,300 0 267,333 (33) 100.01 °Ao General Government- IT capital replacements 120,000 8,343 97,455 22,545 81.21% General Government - City Hall Remodel 23,300 0 12,842 10,458 55.11% City Manager (2 scanners) 3,000 0 3,000 0 100.00% Public Safety (const offices for unit supervisors) 25,000 0 0 25,000 0.00% Community & Econ Dev (comp plan update) 250,000 1,943 206,704 43,296 82.68%° Parks & Rec (upgrade dial-up modem at pools) 10,000 0 1,955 8,045 19.55°1° Parks & Rec (replace CP lounge carpet) 8,000 8,000 8,000 0 100.00°/° Parks & Ree (CenterPlace 10yranniversary) 7,400 0 7,938 (538) 107.28°/a Parks & Rec (CenterPlace Roof Repairs) 36,000 2,512 13,883 22,117 38.56°/ Parks & Ree (Windstorm Park Clean-up) 0 38,045 38,045 (38,045) 0.00% Police Department - CAD/RMS 309,700 0 210,343 99,357 67.92% Police Department - (gate motor replace) 4,300 0 4,253 47 98.90% Police Department - (radar recorder) 4,600 0 4,600 0 100.00°1 Transfers out - #312 ('13 fund bal X54%) 1,783,512 0 1,783,512 0 100.00% Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 2,967,687 67,176 2,775.438 192,249 93.52% Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (2,927,262) (67,176) (2,735,013) 192,249 Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues Over (Under) Total Expenditures (2,958,569) 1,535,004 188,100 3,146,669 Beginning fund balance 24,573,898 24,573,898 Ending fund balance 21,615,329 24,761,998 Page 6 P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201612015 12 31 - 2015 12 PRELIMINARY No 2.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2015 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS #101 - STREET FUND [RECURRING ACTIVITY Budget Year Elapsed 2015 100.0% 2015 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget % of December December 31 Remaining Budget Revenues Motor Vehicle Fuel (Gas) Tax 1,859,900 333,702 1,935,629 75,729 104.07% Investment Interest 3,000 742 3,212 212 107.05% Insurance Premiums & Recoveries 0 0 4,319 4,319 0.00% Utility Tax 2,565,100 175,235 2,073,712 (49'1,388) 80.84% Miscellaneo+,s Revenue 10,000 0 9,647 (353) 96.47% Total Recurring Revenues 4.438,000 509,679 4,026,518 (411,482) 90.73% Expenditures Wages / Benefits 1 Payroll Taxes 877,297 94,230 739,186 (61,889) 109.14% Supplies 111,500 6,565 119,014 (7514) 106.74% Services & Charges 2,122,808 298,774 2,074,994 47,814 97.75% Snow Operations 520,000 219,679 465,232 54,768 89.47% Intergovernmental Payments 748,000 141,555 743,127 4,873 99.35% Interfund Transfers -out - #001 39,700 3,305 39,700 0 100.00% Interfund Transfers -out - #501 (non -plow vehicle 12,077 1,003 12,077 (0) 100.00% Interfund Transfers -out - #311 (pavement preserv= 206,618 17,215 206,618 (0) 100.00% Interfund Transfers -out - #502 (unemployment) 0 3 0 0 0,00% Total Recurring Expenditures 4,438,000 782,336 4,399,948 38,052 99.14% Recurring Revenues Over (Under) Recurring Expenditures 0 (272,657) (373,430) (373,430) NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Grants Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 11.200 11,200 11,200 0.00% 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Revenues 0 11,200 11,200 11,200 0.00% Expenditures Capital 45,000 20,312 110,878 (65,878) 246.40% Pavement marking grinder 8,000 0 6,019 1,981 75.23% Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 53,000 20,312 116,896 (63,896) 220.56% Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (53,000) (9,112) (105,596) (52,696) Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues Over (Under) Total Expenditures (53,000) (281,769) (479,126) (426,126) Beginning fund balance 1,705,244 1,705,244 Ending fund balance 1,652,244 1,226,118 Page 7 P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports) Council Monthly Reports1201612015 12 31 - 2015 12 PRELIMINARY No 2.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Twetve-Mo nth Period Ended December 31, 2015 [SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS • continued #103 - PATHS & TRAILS Revenues Motor Vehicle Fuel (Gas) Tax Investment Interest Total revenues Expenditures Miscellaneous Capital Outlay Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning fund balance Ending fund balance Budget Year Elapsed = 2015 100.0% 2015 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget December December 31 Remaining % of Budget 7,800 1,407 8,164 364 104.67% 0 17 62 62 0.00% 7,800 1,4255 8,226 426 105.46% 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 7,800 1,425 8,226 426 29,828 29,828 37,628 38,054 #104 - TOURISM FACILITIES HOTEL/MOTEL TAX FUND Revenues Tourism Facilities Hotel/Motel Tax Investment Interest 178,700 0 54,526 182,236 3,536 101.98% 76 111 111 0.00% Total revenues 178,700 Expenditures Capital Expenditures 0 Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning fund balance Ending fund balance #105 - HOTEL / MOTEL TAX FUND Revenues Hotel/Motel Tax investment Interest 54,602 182,347 3,647 102.04% 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 178,700 0 54,602 182,347 3,647 0 178,700 182.347 550,000 83,885 581,237 3'. ,237 105,68% 300 125 484 184 161.35% Total revenues 550,300 84,012 581,721 3',421 105.71% Expenditures Interfund Transfers - #001 30,000 30,000 30,000 0 100,00% Interfund Transfers - #309 (Volleyball Cts) 68,000 0 68,000 0 100.00% Tourism Promotion 502,000 141,243 484,968 17,032 96.61% Total expenditures 600,000 171,243 582,968 Revenues over (under) expenditures (49,700) (87,231) (1,247) Beginning fund balance 209,949 209,949 Ending fund balance 160,249 208,702 Page 8 17,032 97.16% 14,390 P.IFinance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2016\2015 12 31 - 2015 12 PRELIMINARY No 2.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2015 SPECIAL- REVENUE FUNDS - continued #106 - SOLID WASTE Revenues Sunshine Administrative Fee Grant Proceeds Total revenues Budget Year Elapsed 2015 1OD. Ce. 2015 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget December December 31 Remaining % of Budget 125,000 31,250 125,000 0 100.00% 26,800 13,883 13,883 12,917 51.80% 151,800 45,133 138,883 12,917 91.49% Expenditures Interfund Transfers - #001 40,425 0 40,425 0 100.00% Supplies 0 0 153 (153) 0.00% Services & Charges 111,375 0 30.377 80,998 27.27% Waste to Resources Activities 0 8,924 18,511 (18,511) 0.00% Total expenditures 151,800 8,924 89.465 62,335 58.94% Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 36,210 49,418 (49,418) Beginning fund balance 7,339 7,339 Ending fund balance 7,339 56,757 #107 - PEG FUND Revenues Comcast PEG Contribution Transfers in - #001 92,000 19,876 81,806 10,194 88.92% 267,300 0 267,333 (33) 100.01% Total revenues 359,300 Expenditures PEG Reimburse - CMTV 12,000 PEG COSV Broadcast 68,400 Total expenditures 80,400 Revenues over (under) expenditures 278,900 Beginning fund balance 0 Ending fund balance 19,876 349,139 10,161 97.17% 0 0 12,000 0.00% 5,443 47,957 20,443 70.11% 5,443 14,432 47,957 32,443 59.65% 301,182 (22,282) 0 278,900 301,182 #120 - CENTER PLACE OPERATING RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest Interfund Transfer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Total revenues 0 0 0 0 0.00% Expenditures Operations 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over (uncer) expenditures 0 0 0 0 Beginning fund balance 300,000 300,000 Ending fund balance 300,000 300,000 Page 9 P:\FinancelFinance Activity ReportsCouncil Monthly Reports\2016\2015 12 31 - 2015 12 PRELIMINARY No 2.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2015 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS - continued Budget Year Elapsed 2015 100.0% 2015 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget % of December December 31 Remaining Budget 4121 - SERVICE LEVEL STABILIZATION RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 8,200 2,543 8,590 390 104.76% Interfund Transfer 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total revenues Expenditures Operations Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning fund balance Ending fund balance 4122 - WINTER WEATHER RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest lnterfund Transfer 8,200 2,543 8,590 390 104.76% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 8,200 2,543 8,590 390 5,453,199 5,453,199 5,461,399 5,461,789 800 247 833 33 104,15% 0 0 0 0 0.00% Subtotal revenues 800 247 833 33 104.15% Expenditures Snow removal expenses 500,000 0 0 500,000 0.00% Total expenditures 500,000 0 0 500,000 0.00% Revenues over (under) expenditures (499,200) 247 833 (499,967) Beginning fund balance 504,020 504,020 Ending fund balance 4,820 504,853 #123 - CIVIC FACILITIES REPLACEMENT FUND Revenues Investment Interest Interfund Transfer - 4001 1,300 271 1,323 23 101.74% 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total revenues 1.300 271 1,323 23 101.74% Expenditures Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0.00% Transfers out - #311 (pavement preservation) 616,284 51,357 616,284 0 100.00% Total expenditures 616,284 51,357 616,284 0 100.00% Revenues over (under) expenditures (614,984) (51,086) (614,961) 23 Beginning fund balance 1,174,070 1,174,070 Ending fund balance 559,086 559,109 Page 10 P:IFinancelFinance Activity Reports}Council Monthly Reports1201612015 12 31 - 2015 12 PRELIMINARY No 2.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2016 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS Budget Year Elapsed = 2015 100.0% 2015 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget December December 31 Remaining % of Budget #204 - DEBT SERVICE FUND Revenues Spokane Public Facilities District 373,800 274,400 373,800 0 100.00% Interfund Transfer -in - #301 82,150 6,846 82,150 0 1.00.00% Interfund Transfer -in -#302 82,150 6,846 82,150 0 100.00% Total revenues 538,100 288,092 538,100 0 100.00% Expenditures Debt Service Payments - CenterPiace 373,800 38,305 374,083 (283) 100.08% Debt. Service Payments - Roads 164,300 14,014 164,017 283 99.83% Total expenditures 538,100 52,319 538,100 0 100.00% Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 235,773 0 0 Beginning fund balance 4,049 4,049 Ending fund balance 4,049 4,049 Page 11 P:1Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201612015 12 31 - 2015 12 PRELIMINARY No 2.xisx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2015 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS #301 - CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues REET 1 - Taxes Investment Interest Total revenues Expenditures Interfund Transfer -out - #204 Interfund Transfer -out - #303 Interfund Transfer -out - #311 (pavement presera Total expenditures Revenues over (uncer) expenditures Beginning fund balance Ending fund balance #302 SPECIAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues REET 2 - Taxes Investment Interest Budget Year Elapsed = 2015 100.0% 2015 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget December December 31 Remaining % of Budget 800,000 71,477 1,065,789 265,789 133.22% 1,000 503 1,654 654 165 36% 801,000 71.983 1,067,442 266,442 133.26% 82,150 6,846 82,150 0 100.00% 569,413 7 554,916 14,497 97.45% 251,049 0 251,049 0 100.00% 902,612 6,846 888,115 14,497 98.39% (101,612) 65,134 179,328 251,945 1,426,957 1,426,957 1,325,345 1,606,285 800,000 216,313 1,065,789 265,789 133.22% 1,000 492 1,662 662 166.23% Total revenues 801,000 216,805 1,067,451 266,451 133.26% Expenditures Interfund Trrisfer-out -#204 82,150 6,845 82,150 0 100.00% Interfund Transfer -out -#303 413,2.71 0 200,227 213,044 48.45% Interfund Transfer -out - #311 (pavementpresen 251,049 0 251,049 0 100.00% Total expenditures 746,470 6,846 533,426 213,044 71.46% Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning fund balance Ending fund balance 54,530 1,325,144 209,959 534,025 1,325,144 1,379,674 1,859,169 Page 12 53,407 P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201612015 12 31 - 2015 12 PRELIMINARY No 2.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2015 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-ti:ontinued 4303 STREET CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds Developer Contribution Miscellaneous Transfer -in - 4301 Transfer -in - 4302 Transfer -in - 4312 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Investment interest Total revenues Budget Year Elapsed = 2015 100.0% 2015 Actual Actual thru Budget % of Budget December December 31 Remaining Budget 10,321,343 81,780 6,365,562 (3,955,781) 61.67% 364,378 51,213 352,563 (11,815) 96.76% 0 0 50 50 0.00% 569,413 0 554,916 (14,497) 97.45% 413,271 0 200,227 (213,044) 48.45% 500,000 0 8,222 (491,778) 1.64% 0 11 38 38 0.00% 12,168,405 133,004 7,481,578 (4,686,827) 61.48% Expenditures 060 Argonne Rd Corridor Upgrade SRTC 06-31 1,214,829 14 1,245,166 (30,337) 102.50% 123 Mission Ave -Flora to Barker 252,570 5,209 37,956 214,614 15.03% 141 Sullivan & Euclid PCC 10,000 330 9,848 152 98.48% 142 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan 120,494 4,230 17,771 102,723 14.75% 149 Sidewalk Infill 93,190 0 8,177 85,013 8.77% 155 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement 7,846,931 2,116,180 6,482,244 1,364,687 82.61% 156 Mansfield Ave. Connection 1,172,716 7,986 712,689 460,027 60.77% 159 University Re /1-90 Overpass Study 40,852 0 2,842 38,010 6.96% 166 Pines Rd. (SR27) & Grace Ave. Int. Safety 101,110 3,991 82,166 18,944 81.26% 167 Citywide Safety Improvements 260,576 106,850 317,653 (57,077) 121.90% 177 Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study 55,556 0 19,332 36,224 34.80% 191 Vista Rd BNSF Xing Safety Improvements 300 0 190 110 63.29% 196 8th Avenue - McKinnon to Fancher 400 0 396 4 99.11% 201 ITS Infill Project Phase 1 (PE Start 2014) 56,056 30,049 37,884 18,172 67.58% 205 Sprague/Barker Intersection improvements 51,428 6,461 13,132 38,296 25.53% 206 Sprague/Long Sidewalk Project 357,714 3,215 304,933 52,781 85.24% 207 Indiana & Evergreen Transit Access 85,000 3,225 3,345 81,655 3.94% 211 Trent Lighting Replacement 96,535 34,989 100,649 (4,114) 104.26% 220 Houk-Sinto-Maxwell St Presentation 18,473 0 15,555 2,918 84.21% 221 McDonald Rd Diet (16th to Mission) 56,800 7,229 7,229 49,571 12.73% 222 Citywide Reflective Signal Backplates 4,500 0 0 4,500 0.00% 223 Pines Rd Underpass @ BNSF & Trent 10,000 0 2,000 8,000 20.00% 224 Mullan Rd Street Preservation 162,375 0 133,069 29,306 81.95% 234 Seth Woodard Sidewalk Improvements 0 6,204 6,204 (6,204) 0.00% xxx N. Sullivan Corridor ITS Project 0 0 0 0 0.00% Contingency 100,000 0 0 100,000 0.00% Total expenditures 12,168,405 2,336,162 9,560,431 2,607,974 78.57% Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 (2,203,158) (2.078,854) (7,294,801) Beginning fund balance 72,930 72,930 Ending fund balance 72,930 (2,005,924) Note: Work performed in the Street Capita! Projects Fund for preservation projects is for items such as sidewalk upgrades that were bid with the pavement preservation work. Page 13 P lFinancelFinance Activity ReportslCouncil Monthly Reports1201612015 12 31 - 2015 12 PRELIMINARY No 2.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2015 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS - continued Budget Year Elapsed 2015 100.0% 2015 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget % of December December 31 Remaining Budget #309 - PARKS CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 90,000 0 453 (89,547) 0.50% lnterfund Transfer -in - #001 115,575 8,333 115,575 (0) 100.00% Interfund Transfer -in - #105 (Brown Volleyball CI 68,000 0 68,000 0 100.00% Interfund Transfer -in 40312 (Appleway Trail) 554,650 0 0 (554,650) 0.00% Investment Interest 500 241 813 313 162.56% Total revenues 828,725 8,574 184,841 (643,884) 22.30% Expenditures 176 Appleway Trail - University to Pines 540,600 483 524,569 16,031 97.03% 203 Browns Park Volleyball Courts 244,200 0 241,481 2,719 98.89% 208 Old Mission Trailhead Parking Improvements 0 0 68 (68) 0.00% 212 Edgecliff Park Restroom Sewer Project 0 0 (6,923) 6,923 0.00% 217 Edgecliff picnic shelter 106,450 0 104,257 2,194 97.94% 225 Pocket dog park 98,975 100,358 108,436 (9,451) 109.56% 227 Appleway Trail - Pines to Evergree 104,050 919 1,803 102,247 1.73% 231 Mission Trailhead landscaping 47,100 41,465 47,066 34 99.93% 232 Shade structure at Discovery Playground 38,000 36,341 36,341 1,659 95,63% xxx. City entry sign 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 1,179,375 179,567 1,057,096 122,279 89.63% Revenues over (under) expenditures (350,650) (170,993) (872,255) (766,163) Beginning fund balance 451,720 451,720 Ending fund balance 101,070 (420,535) #310 - CIVIC FACILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Investment Interest 1,200 577 2.113 913 176.11% Interfund Transfer -in - #001 339,300 28.275 339,300 0 100.00% Interfund Transfer -in -#312 58,324 0 58,324 0 100.00% Total revenues 398,824 Expenditures Capital (City Hall Land Acquisition) Professional Services 12,100 28,852 399,737 913 100.23% 1,128,200 0 1,128,118 82 99.99% 0 8,621 3,480 71.24% Total expenditures 1,140,300 0 1,136,738 3,562 99.69% Revenues aver (under) expenditures (741,476) 28,852 (737,001) (2,648) Beginning fund balance 1,919,550 1,919,550 Ending fund balance 1,178,074 1,182,549 Note: The fund balance includes $839,285.10 paid by the Library District for 2.82 acres at the Balfour Park site. if the District does not succeed in getting a voted bond approved by October 2017 then the City may repurchase this 'and ar the original sate price of $839.285.10. Page 14 P:\FinancelFinance Activity ReportslCouncil Monthly Reportst201612015 12 31 - 2015 12 PRELIMINARY No 2.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2015 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS -continued Budget Year Elapsed = 2015 100.0% 2015 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget December December3l Remairing % of Budget 4311 STREET CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 2011+ Revenues lnterfund Transfers in -#101 206,618 17,218 206,618 0 100,00% Interfund Transfers in -#123 616,284 51,357 616,284 0 100.00% Interfund Transfers in -#301 251,049 0 251,049 0 100.00% Interfund Transfers in -#302 251,049 0 251,049 0 100.00% Interfund Transfers in- #001 920,000 76,667 920,000 0 100.00% Grant Proceeds 971,032 0 871,266 (99,766) 89.73% Investment Interest 0 1,004 3,390 3,390 0.00% Total revenues 3,216,032 146,245 3,119,656 (96,376) 97.00% Expenditures Pre -Project GeoTech Services 50,000 41,432 41,432 8,568 82.86% Pavement Preservation 2,565,050 0 0 2,565,050 0.00% 179 2013 Street Preservation Ph2 0 0 2,851 (2,851) 0.00% 180 2013 Street Preservation Ph3 0 0 209 (209) 0.00% 186 Adams Roac Resurfacing 0 0 388 (388) 0.00% 187 Sprague Ave Preservation Project 0 0 2,915 (2,915) 0.00% 188 Sullivan Rd Preservation Project 0 466 888,634 (888,634) 0.00% 202 Appleway Street Preservation Project 0 0 226 (226) 0.00% 211 Sullivan Trent to Wellesley 0 20,613 454,799 (454.799) 0.00% 218 Montgomery Ave Street Preservation 0 303 308,223 (308,223) 0.00% 220 Houk-Sinto-Maxwell Street Preservation 0 513 294,057 (294,057) 0.00% 224 Mullan Rd Street Preservation 0 5,140 361,004 (361,004) 0.00% 226 Appleway Resurfacing Park to Dishman 0 6,959 6,959 (6,959) 0.00% 229 32nd Ave Preservation 0 11,806 34,660 (34,660) 0.00% 233 Broadway Ave St Presery - Sulliv to Moore 0 2,626 4,051 (4,051) 0.00% Total expenditures 2,615,050 89,859 2,400,408 214,642 91.79% Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning fund balance Ending fund balance #312 - CAPITAL RESERVE FUND Revenues Transfers in - #001 Investment Interest 600,982 1,922,013 56,387 719,249 1,922,013 2,522,995 2,641,262 (31 ,018) 1,783,512 0 1,783,512 0 100.00% 0 3 0 0 0.00% Total fever ues 1,783,512 3 1,783,512 0 100.00% Expenditures Transfers out - #303 - Sullivan Rd VV Bridge 500,000 0 8,222 491,778 1.64% Transfers out - #309 - Appleway Trail' 540,600 3 0 540,600 0.00% Transfers out - #309 - Appleway Trail (Pines to `. 14,050 0 0 1,1,050 0.00% Transfers out - #310 - City Hall Land 58,324 3 58,324 0 100.00% Transfers out - #313 - City Hall Constr 5,162,764 0 5.162,764 0 100.00% Total expenditures 6,275,738 0 5,229,310 1,046,428 83.33% Revenues over(under)expenditures (4,492,226) 0 (3,445,798) (1,046,428) Beginning fund balance 8,581,715 8,581,715 Ending fund balance 4,089,489 5,135,917 #313 - CITY HALL CONSTRUCTION FUND Revenues Transfers in - #312 Total revenues Expenditures Professional Services Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning fund balance Ending fund balance 5,162,764 0 5,162,764 0 100,00% 5,162,764 0 5,162,764 0 100.00% 702,400 113,821 352,138 340,263 51.56% 702,400 113,821 4,460,364 0 4,460,364 (113,821) Page 15 362,138 4,800,627 0 4,800,627 340,263 51.56% (340,263) POinancelFinance Activity Reports'Council Monthly Reports1201612015 12 31 - 2015 12 PRELIMINARY No 2.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2015 ENTERPRISE FUNDS #402 - STORMWATER FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Budget Year Elapsed = 2015 100.0% 2015 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget December December 31 Remaining % of Budget Revenues Stormwater Management Fees 1,880.000 156,251 1,861,368 (18,632) 99.01% Investment Interest 1,500 727 2,455 955 163.65% Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total Reci.rring Revenues 1,881,500 157,018 1,863,823 (17,677) 99.06% Expenditures Wages / Benefits / Payroll Taxes 488,101 38,821 396,799 91,302 81.29% Supplies 15,900 619 30,240 (14,340) 190.19% Services & Charges 1,097,168 156,705 1,0864479 10,989 99.00% Intergovernmental Payments 27,000 1,200 15,291 11,709 56.63% Interfund Transfers -out - #001 13,400 1,117 13,400 (0) 100.00% Total Recurring Expenditures 1,641,869 Recurring Revenues Over (Under) Recurring Expenditures NONRECURRING ACTIVITY 198,461 1,542,210 99,659 93.93% 239,631 (41,443) 321,613 81,982 Revenues Grant Proceeds 389,674 0 380,857 (8,817) 97.74% lnterfund Transfers -in - #403 120,000 0 120,000 0 100.00% Developer Contributions 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total Nonr=curring Revenues 509,674 0 500,857 (8,817) 98.27% Expenditures Capital - various projects 875,340 0 230,247 645,093 26.30% VMS Trailer 16,000 0 15,546 454 97.16% 188 Sullivan Rd Preservation 0 0 50,680 (50,680) 0.00% 193 Effectiveness Study 0 0 192.638 (192,638) 0.00% 198 Sprague, Park to University LID 0 0 10,453 (10,453) 0,00% 199 Havana - Yale Diversion 0 0 4,887 (4,887) 0.00% 200 Ponderosa Surface Water Diversion 0 0 3,540 (3,540) 0.00% 206 Sprague/Long Sidewalk Project 0 0 25,967 (25,967) 0.00% 211 Sullivan Trent to Wellesley 0 464 143,255 (143,255) 0.00% 218 Montgomery Ave. St Preservation 0 0 87,314 (87,314) 0.00% 220 Houk-Sinto-Maxwell St Preservation 0 0 77,361 (77,361) 0.00% 224 Mullan Rd Street Preservation 0 0 16,427 (16,427) 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 891,340 464 858,315 33,025 96.29% Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (381,666) (464) (357,458) 24,208 Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues Over (Underi Total Expenditures (142,035) (41,907) (35,845) 106,190 Beginning working capital 1,933,564 1,933,564 Ending working capital 1,791,529 1,897,719 Note: Work performed in the Stormwarer Fund for preservation projects is for stormwarer improvements that were brd with the pavement preservation work. Page 16 P 1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\ Council Monthly Reports1201612015 12 31 - 2015 12 PRELIMINARY No 2.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2015 ENTERPRISE FUNDS - continued Budget Year Elapsed = 2015 100.0% 2015 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget December December 31 Remaining % of Budget #403 -AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA Revenues Spokane County 500,000 236,677 533,593 33,593 106.72% Grant DOE - Broadway SD Retrofit 1,260,000 0 433,773 (826,227) 34.43% Grant revenue 0 0 602.830 602,830 0.00% Total revenues Expenditures Interfund Transfer -out - #402 197 Broadway SD retrofit Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning working capital Ending working capital 1,760,000 236,677 1,570,196 (189,805) 89.22% 120,000 1,080,000 0 120,000 0 0 530,308 549,692 100.00% 49.10% 1,200,000 560,000 1,773 0 236,677 650.308 549,692 54.19% 919,887 (739,496) 1,773 561,773 921,660 Page 17 P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reparts1201612015 12 31 - 2015 12 PRELIMINARY No 2.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2015 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS #501 - ER&R FUND Revenues Transfer -in -#001 Transfer -in -#101 Transfer -in - #402 Investment Interest Total reverues Expenditures Vehicle Acquisitions Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning working capital Ending working capital Budget Year Elapsed = 2015 100.0% 2015 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget December December 31 Remaining % of Budget 19,300 1,608 19,300 0 100.00% 12.077 1,005 12,077 0 100.00% 4,167 347 4,167 0 100.00% 1,000 429 1,449 449 144.91% 36,544 3,391 36,993 449 101.23% 30,000 0 23,790 6,210 79.30% 30,000 6,544 1,235,794 0 3,391 23,790 13,203 1,235,794 6,210 79.30% 1,242,338 1,248,997 (5,161) #502 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND Revenues Investment interest 0 2 8 8 0.00% Interfund Transfer - #101 0 0 0 0 0.00% Interfund Transfer -#001 325.000 27,083 325,000 (0) 100.00% Total revenues 325,000 Expenditures Auto & Property Insurance Unemployment Claims Miscellaneous Total expenditures Revenues over (uncer) expenditures Beginning working capital Ending working capital 27,086 325,008 8 100.00% 325,000 0 284,112 40,888 87.42% 0 1,105 14,722 (14, 722) 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 325,000 0 168,209 1,105 298,834 26,166 91.95% 168,209 25,981 26,174 (26,157) 168,209 194,383 SUMMARY FOR ALL FUNDS Total of Revenues for all Funds 74,208,705 7,375,724 69,706.487 Per revenue status report 74.208,705 7,375,724 69,706,487 Difference 0 (0) 0 Total of Expenditures for all Funds Per expenditure status report 78,056,137 7,819,075 70,040,387 78,056,137 7,819,075 70,040,387 0 (0) 0 Total Capital expenditures (included in total expenditures) 20,048,270 2.753,972 15,998,895 Page 18 P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\201612015 12 31 - 2915 12 PRELIMINARY No 2.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Investment Report For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2015 Beginning Deposits Withdrawls Interest Ending 001 General Fund 101 Street Fund 103 Trails & Paths 104 Tourism Facilities Hotel/Motel 105 Hotel/Motel 120 CenterPlace operating Reserve 121 Service Level Stabilization Reserve 122 Winter Weather Reserve 123 Civic Facilities Replacement 301 Capital Projects 302 Special Capital Projects 303 Street Capital Projects Fund 304 Mirabeau Point Project 307 Capital Grants Fund 309 Parks Capital Project 310 Civic Buildings Capital Projects 311 Pavement Preservation 312 Capital Reserve Fund 402 Stormwater Management 403 Aquifer Protection Fund 501 Equipment Rental & Replacement 502 Risk Management *Local Government Investment Pool 2/11/2016 $ 44,184,763.71 $ 3,003,008.62 $ 2,000,000.00 $ 49,187,772.33 2,298,092.10 0.00 0.00 2,298,092.10 (3,000,000.00) 0.00 0.00 (3,000,000.00) 23,717.99 2,994.78 0.00 26,712.77 $ 43,506,573.80 $ 3,006,003.40 $ 2,000,000.00 $ 48,512,577.20 matures: 6/28/2016 rate: 0,40% 11/4/2016 0.50° Balance Earnings Budget Total LGIP* BB CD 2 BB CD 3 Investments $ 44,184,763.71 $ 3,003,008.62 $ 2,000,000.00 $ 49,187,772.33 2,298,092.10 0.00 0.00 2,298,092.10 (3,000,000.00) 0.00 0.00 (3,000,000.00) 23,717.99 2,994.78 0.00 26,712.77 $ 43,506,573.80 $ 3,006,003.40 $ 2,000,000.00 $ 48,512,577.20 matures: 6/28/2016 rate: 0,40% 11/4/2016 0.50° Balance Earnings Budget Current Period Year to date $ 31,833,139.23 1,518,133.87 35,573.63 155,319.48 257,110.76 300, 000.00 5,201,470.20 504,534.77 553, 880.18 1,029,220.28 1,006,549.11 22,895.29 0.00 0.00 492,150.21 1,181,086.10 2,052,592.76 0.00 1,486,399.44 0.00 877,410.86 5,111.03 $ 18,704.82 742.22 17.39 75.94 125.70 0.00 2,543.01 246.67 270.79 503.19 492.10 11.20 0.00 0.00 240,61 577,44 1,003.52 0.00 726.71 0.00 428.97 2.49 $ 73,378.47 3,211.5E 61.94 110.81 484.05 0.00 8,590.23 833.23 1,322.61 1,653.57 1,662.31 37.81 0.00 0,00 812.80 2,113.36 3,389.87 0.00 2,454.80 0.00 1,449.05 8.44 $ 65,000.00 3,000.00 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 7,300.00 700.00 1,700.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500.00 1,900.00 0.00 0.00 2,500.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 $ 48,512,577.20 $ 26,712.77 $ 101,574.91 $ 85,900.00 Page 19 P1FinancelFinance Activity Reparts\Council Monthly Reports\2016\2015 12 31 - 2015 12 PRELIMINARY No 2.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Sales Tax Receipts For the Twelve -Month Period Ended December 31, 2015 Month 2/1112016 Difference Received 2014 2015. February 1,891,031.43 1,962,820.56 71,789.13 3.80% March 1,324,975.84 1,358,307.78 33,331.94 2.52% April 1,357, 736.39 1,401,618.35 43, 881.96 3.23% May 1,636, 894.44 1,655,903.08 19, 008.64 1.16% June 1,579,545.34 1,557,740.48 (21,804.86) (1.38%) July 1,653, 343.86 1,886,262.22 232, 918.36 14.09% August 1,751,296.73 1,944,085.56 192,788.83 11.01% September 1,772,033.14 1,894,514.58 122,481.44 6.91% October 1.754,039.63 1,765,807.42 11,767.79 0.67% November 1,802,029.08 1,836,885.94 34,856.86 1.93% December 1,619,010.52 1,683,925.38 64,914.86 4.01% January 1,565,739.35 1,633,949.35 68,210.00 4.36% 19,707,675.75 20,581,820.70 874,144.95 4.44% 19,707,675.75 20,581,820.70 Sales tax receipts reported here reflect remittances for general sales tax, criminal justice sales tax and public safety tax. The sales tax rate for retail sales transacted within the boundaries of the City of Spokane Valley is 8.7%. The tax that is paid by a purchaser at the point of sale is remitted by the vendor to the Washington State Department of Revenue who then remits the taxes back to the various agencies that have imposed the tax. The allocation of the total 8.7% tax rate to the agencies is as follows: - State of Washington 6.50% - City of Spokane Valley 0.85% - Spokane County 0.15% - Spokane Public. Facilities listrict 0 10% - Criminal Justice 0.10% * - Public Safety 0.10% * 2.20% local tax - Juvenile Jail 0.10% *: - Mental Health 0.10% * - Law Enforcement Communications 0.10% - Spokane Transit Authority 0.60% * 8.70% * Indicates voter approved sales taxes In addition to the .85% reported above that the City receives, we also receive a portion of the Criminal Justice and Public Safety sales taxes. The distribution of those taxes is computed as follows: Criminal Justice: The tax is assessed county -wide and of the total collected, the State distributes 10% of the receipts to Spokane County, with the remainder allocated on a per capita basis to the County and the cities within the County. Public Safety: The tax is assessed county -wide and of the total collected, the State distributes 60% of the receipts to Spokane County, with the remainder allocated on a per capita basis to the cities within the County. Page 20 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Sales Tax Collections - December For the years 2006 through 2015 January February March April May June July August September October November December Total Collections Budget Estimate Actual over (under) budg Total actual collections as a % of total budget % change in annual total collected P:LFinancelFinance Activity ReportslTax Revenue\Saies Tax12015isales tax collections 2015 - December.xlsx 2006 ] 2007 2008 1 2009 1 2010 1 2011 2012 1 2013 1 2014 015 1,572,609 1,068,743 1,072,330 1,371,030 1,392,111 1,362,737 1,555,124 1,405,983 1,487,155 1,526,910 1,369,940 1,366,281 1,759,531 1,155,947 1,196,575 1,479,603 1,353,013 1,428,868 1,579,586 1,516,324 1,546,705 1,601,038 1,443,843 1,376,434 1,729,680 1,129,765 1,219,611 1,423,459 1,243,259 1,386,908 1,519,846 1,377,943 1,364,963 1,344,217 1,292,327 1,129,050 1,484,350 1,098,575 1,068,811 1,134,552 1,098,054 1,151,772 1,309,401 1,212,531 1,227,813 1,236,493 1,155,647 1,070,245 1,491,059 963,749 1,018,468 1,184,137 1,102,523 1,123,907 1,260,873 1,211,450 1,191,558 1,269, 505 1,139,058 1,141,012 1,460,548 990,157 1,015,762 1,284,180 1,187,737 1,248,218 1,332,834 1,279,500 1,294,403 1,291,217 1,217,933 1,247,920 1,589,887 1,009,389 1,067,733 1,277,621 1,174,962 1,290,976 1,302,706 1,299,678 1,383,123 1,358,533 1,349,580 1,323,189 1,671,269 1,133,347 1,148,486 1,358,834 1,320,449 1,389,802 1,424,243 1,465,583 1,466,148 1,439,321 1,362,021 1,408,134 1,677,887 1,170,640 1,201,991 1,448,539 1,400,958 1,462,558 1,545,052 1,575,371 1,552,736 1,594,503 1,426,254 1,383,596 1,732,299 1,197,323 1,235, 252 1,462,096 1,373,710 1,693,461 1,718,428 1,684,700 1,563,950 1,618,821 1,487,624 1,441,904 16,550,953 16,002,000 548,953 17,437,467 17,466,800 (29,333) 16,161,028 17,115, 800 (954, 772) 14,248,244 17,860,000 (3,611,756) 14, 097,299 14,410,000 (312,701) 14,850,409 14,210,000 640,409 15,427, 377 14,210,000 1,217,377 16,587,617 15,250,000 1,337,617 17,440,083 16,990,000 450,083 18,209,568 17,628,400 581,168 103.43% 99.83% 94.42% 79.78% 97.83% 104.51% 108.57% 108.77% 102.65% 103.30% 10.02% 5.36% (7.32%) (11.84%) (1.06%) 5.34% 3.89% 7.52% 5.14% 4.41% Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of December 2/8/2016 2015 to 2014 Difference 54,412 26,683 33,261 13.557 (27,246) 230,903 173,376 109,329 11,214 24,318 61,370 58,308 769,485 3.24% 2.28% 2.77% 0.94% (1.94%) 15.79% 11.22% 6.94% 0.72% 1.53% 4.30% 4.21% 4,41% Page 21 December u: November 20,000,000 18,000,000 16,000,000 MIN14,000,000 ea October - - L Septemhe a August 12,000,000 1D,000,000- A_ .. a July 8,000,000 Lii lune 6,000,000 • May 4,000,000 alia n April 2,000,000 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 1 2015 m March ■ February 0 Page 21 1 P:1Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax RevenuelLodging Tax\2015\105 hotel motel tax 2015 - December.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Hotel/Motel Tax Receipts through - December Actual for the years 2006 through 2015 2006 1 2007 1 2008 1 2009 j 2010 1 2011 2012 1 2013 1 2014f2015 January 20,653.49 February 20,946.09 March 24,308.48 April 34,371.82 May 32,522.06 June 34,256.71 July 49,744.62 August 45,916.16 September 50,126.53 October 38,674,17 November 36,417.11 December 29,147.15 25,137, 92 25,310.66 29,190.35 37, 950.53 31,371.01 36,267-07 56,281.99 51,120.70 57,260.34 43,969.74 36,340.64 31,377.41 28,946.96 24,623.06 27,509.99 40,406.02 36,828.53 46,659.88 50,421.37 50,818.35 60,711.89 38,290.46 35,582.59 26,290.11 23,280.21 23,283.95 25,272.02 36,253.63 32,588.80 40,414.59 43,950.26 50,146.56 50,817.62 36,784.36 34,054.79 27,131.43 22,706.96 23,416.94 24,232.35 39,463.49 34,683.32 39.935.36 47,385.18 54,922.99 59,418.96 41,272.35 34,329.78 26,776.84 22,212.21 22,792.14 24,611.28 38,230.49 33,790.69 41,403,41 49,311.97 57,451.68 58,908.16 39,028.08 37,339.36 32,523.19 21,442.32 21,548.82 25,654.64 52,130.37 37,478.44 43,970.70 52,818.60 57,229.23 64.298.70 43,698.90 39,301.22 30,432.13 24,184.84 25,974 98 27,738 65 40,979.25 40, 560.41 47,850.15 56,157.26 63,816.45 70,794.09 43,835.57 42,542.13 34,238.37 25,425.40 26,013.62 29,383.93 48,245.81 41,122-66 52,617.63 61,514.48 70,383.93 76,099.59 45,604.07 39,600.06 33,256.28 27,092.20 27,111.00 32,998.14 50,454.72 44,283.17 56,975.00 61,808.87 72,696.67 74,051.29 49,879.71 42,376.17 41, 509.90 2/8/2016 2015 to 2014 Difference 1,667 6.56% 1,097 4.22% 3,614 12.30% 2,209 4.58% 3,161 7.69% 4,357 8.28% 294 0.48% 2,313 3.29% (2,048) (2.69%) 4,276 9.38% 2,776 7.01% 8,254 24.82% Total Collections 417,084.39 461,578.36 467,089.21 423,978.22 448,544,52 457,602.66 490,004.07 518,672.15 549,267.46 581,236.84 31,969,38 5.82% Budget Estimate 350,000.00 400.000.00 400.000.00 512.000,00 380,000.00 480.000.00 430,000.00 490,000.00 530,000.00 550,000.00 Actual over (under) budg 67,084.39 61,578.36 67,089.21 (88,021.78) 68,544,52 (22,397.34) 60,004,07 28.672.15 19,267.46 31,236.84 Total actual collections as a % of total budget 119.17% 115.39% 116.77% 82.81% 118.04% 95.33% 113.95% 105.85% 103.64% 105-68% % change in annual total collected 7.54% 10.67% 1.19% (9.23%) 5.79% 2.02% 7.08% 5.85% 5.90% 5.82% Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of December 700,000.00 600,000.00 500,000.00 400,000.00 300,000.00 I 200,000.00 -1 100,000.00 0.00 - 2006 ■ 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 December November v October September • August m July u June • May R April m March is February • January Page 22 P:\Finance\Finance Activity ReportstTax RevenuelREET120151301 and 302 REET for 2015 - December.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 1st and 2nd 114% REET Collections through December Actual for the years 2006 through 2015 2006 1 2007 1 2008 1 2009 1 2010 1 2011 1 2012 1 2013 1 2014 1 2015 January 243,894.16 February 172,154.72 March 182,065.71 April 173,796.61 May 306,871.66 June 226,526.64 July 2,104.30 August 451,700.06 September 188,066.23 October 211,091.20 November 141,729.09 December 161,285.23 228,896.76 129,919.79 263,834.60 211,787.08 222,677.17 257,477,05 323,945.47 208,039.87 165,287,21 206,442.92 191,805.53 179,567.77 145,963.47 159,503.34 133,513.35 128,366.69 158,506.43 178,202.98 217,942.98 133,905.93 131,240.36 355,655.60 147,875.00 96,086.00 55,281.25 45,180.53 73,306.86 81,155.83 77,463.58 105.020.98 122,530.36 115.829,68 93,862.17 113.960.52 133,264.84 71,365.60 59,887.08 64,121.61 86,204.41 99,507.19 109,624.89 105,680.28 84,834.48 72,630.27 75,812.10 93,256.02 72,021,24 38,724.50 64,128.13 36,443.36 95,879.78 79,681.38 124,691.60 81,579.34 79,629.06 129,472.44 68,019.83 61,396.23 74,752.72 65,077.29 46,358.75 56,114.56 71,729.67 86,537.14 111,627.22 124,976.28 101,048.69 106,517.19 63,516.73 238,094.79 104,885.99 74,299.65 56,898.44 155,226.07 72,171.53 90,376.91 116,164.91 139,112.11 128,921.02 117,149.90 174,070.25 117,805.76 78,324.02 75,429.19 61,191.55 67,048.50 81,723.70 105,448.15 198,869.74 106,675.77 208,199.38 172,536.46 152,322.59 123,504.75 172,226.74 117,681.62 96,140.79 103,507.94 165,867.91 236,521.17 165,748.39 347,420.87 217,374.58 202,525.05 179,849.27 128,832.69 129,869.62 157,919.41 l 2/8/2016 2015 to 2014 Difference $ oda 34,949 57.11% 36,459 54.38% 84,144 102.96% 131,073 124.30% (33,121) (16.65%) 240,745 225.68% 9,175 4.41% 29.989 17.38% 27,527 18.07% 5,328 4.31% (42,357) (24.59%) 40,238 34.19% Total distributed by Spokane County 2,461,285.61 2,589,681.22 1,986,762.13 1,088,222.20 962,304.07 960,751.16 1,185306.65 1,321,650.07 1,567,428.95 2,131,577.69 564,148.74 Budget estimate 2,000.000.00 2,000,000.00 2.000,000.00 2,000.000.00 760,000.00 800,000.00 950,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,200.000.00 1,600,000.00 Actual over (under) budget 461,285.61 589,681.22 (13,237.87) (911,777.80) 202,304.07 160,751.16 235,706.66 321,650,07 367,428.95 531,577.69 Total actual collections as a % of total budget 123.06% 129.48% 99.34% 54.41% 126.62% 120.09% 124.81% 132.17% 130.62% 133.22% % change in annual total collected (1.19%) 5.22`0 (23.28%) (45,23%) (11.57%) (0,16%) 23.41% 11,47% 18.60% 35.99% Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of December 3,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 1 1 2,000,000.ao --- 1,500,000.00 i — 1,000,000.00 500,000.00 0.00 i 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 35.99% December ,, November October September ■ August a July • June • May ■ April al March • February • January Page 23 H:\Finance Activity Re ports12015\d'ebt capacity.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Debt Capacity 2/17/2016 2015 Assessed Value for 2016 Property Taxes Voted (UTGO) Nonvoted (LTGO) Voted park Voted utility 1.00% of assessed value 1.50% of assessed value 2.50% of assessed value 2.50% of assessed value 7,748,275,097 Maximum Debt Capacity Outstanding as of 12/31/2015 Remaining Debt Capacity Utilized 77,482,751 116,224,126 193,706,877 193,706,877 581,120,631 0 6,375,000 0 0 6,375,000 77,482,751 109,849,126 193,706,877 193,706,877 574,745,631 0.00% 5.49% 0.00% 0.00% 1.10% Bonds Repaid Bonds Remaining 2014 LTGO Bonds Period Ending CenterPtace Road & Street Improvements Total 12/1/2014 12/1/2015 12/1/2016 12/1/2017 12/1/2018 12/1/2019 12/1/2020 12/1/2021 12/1/2022 12/1/2023 12/1/2024 12/1/2025 12/1/2026 12/1/2027 12/1/2028 12/1/2029 12/1/2030 12/1/2031 12/1/2032 12/1/2033 225,000 175,000 135,000 125,000 360,000 300,000 400,000 260,000 660,000 185,000 190,000 230,000 255,000 290,000 320,000 350,000 390,000 430,000 465,000 505,000 395,000 300,000 245,000 225,000 180,000 130,000 165,000 130,000 130,000 135,000 140,000 140,000 145,000 150,000 155,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 315,000 320,000 365,000 395,000 430,000 465,000 500,000 545,000 430,000 465,000 505,000 395,000 300,000 245,000 225,000 180,000 130,000 165,000 5,250,000 1,125,000 6,375,000 5,650,000 1,385,000 7,03 5,000 Page 24 P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\MVFT120151motor vehicle fuel tax collections 2015 - December.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Motor Fuel (Gas) Tax Collections - December For the years 2006 through 2015 2006 1 2007 2008 2009 1 2010 1 2011 1 2012 2013 1 2014 1 2015 January 157,910 February 145,663 March 144,867 April 158,729 May 152,049 June 166,506 July 162,989 August 183,127 September 187,645 October 178,782 November 177,726 December 159,974 172,711 162,079 156,194 175,010 173,475 183,410 178,857 183,815 191,884 180,570 181,764 159,750 165,698 149,799 159,316 165,574 162,281 176,085 166,823 171,690 176,912 165,842 193,360 142,230 133,304 155,832 146,264 161,117 156,109 173,954 169,756 179,012 175,965 163,644 167,340 144,376 161,298 145,869 140,486 161,721 158,119 168,146 164,221 176,869 175,067 164,475 168,477 143,257 154,792 146,353 141,849 165,019 154,700 158,351 165,398 153,361 173,820 158,889 160.461 124,714 159,607 135,208 144,297 153,546 144,670 159,827 160,565 164,050 171,651 153,022 162,324 138,223 146,145 145,998 135,695 156,529 151,595 167,479 155,348 173,983 195,397 133,441 164,303 142,140 152,906 148,118 131,247 156,269 156,850 161,965 157,805 172,308 173,299 160,539 165,871 141,298 152,598 145,455 140,999 157,994 156,259 164,872 168,205 186,277 174,505 161,520 181,771 153,338 218/2016 2015 to 2014 Difference $ 0% (308) (0.20%) (2,663) (1.80%) 9,752 7.43% 1,725 1.10% (591) (0.38%) 2,907 1.79% 10,400 6.59% 13,969 8.11% 1,206 0.70% 981 0.61% 15,900 9.59% 12,040 8.52% Total Collections 1,975,967 2,099,519 1,995,610 1,926,673 1,928,005 1,857,707 1,846,990 1,868,053 1,878,475 1,943,793 65,318 3.48% Budget Estimate 1,753,000 2,000,000 2,150,000 2,050,000 1,900,000 1,875,000 1,897,800 1,861,100 1,858,600 1,858,600 Actual over (under) budg 222,967 99,519 (154,390) (123,327) 28,005 (17,293) (50,810) 6,953 19,875 85,193 Total actual collections as a % of total budget 112,72% 104.98% 92,82% 93.98% 101,47% 99.08% 97.32% 100.37% 101,07% 104.58% % change in annual total collected 9.57% 6.25% (4.95%) (3.45%) 0.07% (3.65%) (0.58%) 1,14% 0.56% 3.48% Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of December 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 December November October September ✓ August rs July ✓ June m May ▪ April ® March ■ February Page 25 P:IFinance\Finance Activity Reports1Tax Revenue\Teiephone Tax120151te]ephone utility tax collections 2015 - December.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Telephone Utility Tax Collections - December For the years 2009 through 2015 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2/10/2016 2015 to 2014 Difference January 128,354 234,622 241,357 193,818 217,478 210,777 177,948 (32,829) (15.58%) February 282,773 266,041 230,366 261,074 216,552 205,953 212,845 6,892 3.35% March 230,721 264,175 245,539 234,113 223,884 208,206 174,738 (33,468) (16.07%) Apri! 275,775 254,984 238,561 229,565 214,618 206,038 214,431 8,393 4.07% May 242,115 255,056 236,985 227,469 129,270 210,010 187,856 (22,154) (10.55%) June 239,334 251,880 239,013 234,542 293,668 210,289 187,412 (22,877) (10.88%) July 269,631 250,593 244,191 226,118 213,078 205,651 190,984 (14,667) (7.13%) August 260,408 246,261 349,669 228,789 211,929 205,645 185,172 (20,473) (9.96%) September 249,380 240,111 241,476 227,042 210,602 199,193 183,351 (15,842) (7.95%) October 252,388 238,500 237,111 225,735 205,559 183.767 183,739 (28) (0.02%) November 254,819 247,848 240,246 225,319 212,947 213,454 175,235 (38,219) (17.91%) December 368,775 236,065 236,449 221,883 213,097 202,077 183,472 (18,605) (9.21%) Total Collections 3,054,473 2,986,136 2,980,963 2,735,467 2,562,682 2,461,060 2,257,183 (203,877) (8.28%) Budget Estimate 2,500,000 2,800,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 2,900,000 2,750,000 2,565,100 Actual over (under) budg 554,473 186,136 (19,037) (264,533) (337,318) (288,940) (307,917) Total actual collections as a % of total budget 122.18% 106.65% 99.37% 91.18% 88.37% 89.49% 88.00% % change in annual total collected n/a (2.24%) (0.17%) (8.24%) (6.32%) (3.97%) (8.28%) Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of December 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 I 2015 December • November r October September IN August 1July • June • May • April ® March IN February Page 26 Rick VanLcuvca Chk1'o}'Police Spokane Valley; Police Department Accredited Since KOI 1 f wr'rl1': d t'C iii JC'1'f!7[a1',t'f7? fJ with thw t.17Pl...4co'?s' f.iJdin.n . hL'rif] .i• ondih<. CrJ)d'if;77.inJfy, L)c';.°lc:Clef to Your Sa/e }. O. c J<r]C2o''ich TO: Mike Jaelo,on, City Manager FROM: Rick 'w anLeuven, Chief of Police DATE: February 15, 2016 RE: Monthly Report December 2015 ldinllai 2016: Januar'', 2015: CAI) 5,134 Reporis Liken: Traffic stops: 1,443 Traffic reports: 344 CAD incidents; 4,918 R°,,,parts taken: 1,936 1 :-,i Mc stops: 1,099 1... f fie reports: 283 (.\i) irr;t:ic ca'its indicate ells for service as well as self -initiated officer contacts. 1-1ot spot maps are aiki.clicd showing January residential acid stolen vebi •.\1:,?i attached are trend -line graphs kir '201 _ . `(11-1. 2015 and ?(} 1(-: C'ii:i:i, 1: ` pL kane �valfiti. 1))::-;m11.:hJ:2d Calls, Self Initiated Calls, Col'is=orfs, Persons Crimes, Property C il]1c ::rn:f Sox Crimes, Also included is the January Crimes by ('itEti*; tats report. This report reflc t:; inHclents -that occurred in a specific city to which a deputy i`I�.,�: Spokane County took the courtesy repo,:. For ;In1111 an individual may have had his car sto!cr1 in airway Heights, and he waited until he 'Our nod home in the Newman Lake arca to make ycport. Ire '2011_ 1. 1. e switched from UCR to NIBRS classification. As a result, certair crimes were broken tac}k n i i 1 i it viul;ttion parts for NIBRS and each pori i:, : , coutied, i.";J1:;..clncnily, comparing �tl'it:il't riH11cti 1),:in c 2011 to cr"ERies durin+. , r r`.t t' 2011_ k rLsc )°1',inclicI Ll uslnL. the raph4. 1111,' crin]L'- ihiit art` impacted, h'v Jic iitli be Compared ki prior ltll�l1 inL!,r.Lcic:.Adult 1 app, .„\S!.3,111.: E, l ,. rt;c rs' and '1 [IClt. :\.i}4111 1S1'R_ .'l`1\''E: ( 11ic'I` \ 1LLtcr,en attended Quarterly Leadership Training in mid-Janu?r y :it the Shcri:..:'s,1' �iiri,t:l tten.dees were given a presentation on fhe Rain iu: "i:2ncltil in ! os ,-4r.ti-,c2L2s, .0;11101 '..•a- (Ic•scribed as "One of the InnOSl debilitating pnlicc Cril]'rl:lltiilil S'r'iS I11 Los f n!!..,!es Page 1 history." The presentation took an in-depth look at the causes, cvents and ciretinv.-i.unces loading op to, surrounding, and beyond the scandal. The dialnime was held by the Captain t ho \N the Commanding Officer of the LAPD Rampart Divisi{31! ;Ind CRASI-I i..lnit ditri11' the intense and tutnoltuous three years when the problems occurred from 1995 to 199S. The I?ra.'s:A- et provided Et candid, rto holds barred, personal accmr•ni of rhL lti:,:-El rsllip issues, which he continually `: c .} duriniLZ and for years beyond that time. I-II gavc a view into the LAPD culitit•c which existed at rbc tir..e, t114 incremental stcps and specific case studies of arrests, shootings [(Lid incidents that led to corruption, the dI wntal1 and narcotics arrest ol:Rafael Perez; the aftermath, its; .:Ell and consequerie�k iI. t. -r -ns of careers, reputations and family. life. And most importantly, the pi -e• -;enter held a discus.,ic1t1 on the 1c<tctcrship insi �,l-�tti. tiIllicsand lessons learned to impact, deter and IlotenLirtl coiruI):I,)n- ',,as held at Rivcrparlc Scuare in mid-January for Human Trot"4kil}i.' ViC•tin1s, whip. 3 ChM' t.tr er attended along with r1LI1C1-s from the Spokane Co. S1 -i1'`. Office. 1'he ev.2tit •4tts sponsored by l utF}eran Community Services NST SA 'eT Respt'rsc Cerwr. Ivlcmhcrti eniorccnmcllt were a.40cl t{, artenc as it sends a. strong message of support to victims :4iid shows our dedication to accountability of offenders. Chief Vanl_.etl en also attc-lded numerous ontlt'§ Inectings such 111x. J..Alership ronin -L, meeting, Lutheran Community Ser}ices NW SAl'eT AcIv'i ;ory Board ' L cl it i. Citizens Board meeting. BlireJt-inr. liar ReforlliI.a.' & Justice ('ominittee} \iceting, Spokane Regionala 1.7e Streets t Hand Northwest Law 1..!In1oreenieut Leadersh'p GroLip 1i1Cti 1It01 S11110 FPS CO.\1I1I UNITY ()RI Ls:Tl'_•D Poi ACING EFFORT (SCOPE): 111 tl7c month of January. S.C.(-►-I'. F:. participated in: r • ,,.114 Kids t.'wjrI1ition f'}e,'411r11 ▪ (.ioodGuicic- \.lenfcrinp, WV I IS o Irvtil7t 'Illi` -(..OI171'lrrllltV Coalition Meeting • Crin1k' St(1ppct'`; • t. J174`.rerr1u11 1'rl:Ilily IL) .1anluar} 2016 Volunteers Hours per Station `trlw!uci. s csrirmtcd vnhir.Le r sL-.rvic) hours that are provided in the City of Spokane Valley, These two locations cover bet i spok inc 1'al1ty Unci clic- ur1-ncorl-orrated porr:c7n of the county_ Location Centra_ Val 1(7Y East Valley} EdecLiff Trentwood Niolunt ens 7 Atlinir, Hour: 79.0 LE. Hours ;5.5 23 179,0 Total Hours 114. 181.0 423,5 7 173.0 University West Valley* TOTALS 23 345-5 360.0 L 5. 98.0 66.5 439.0 271.0 412.0 20 580.5 0 584.5 100 1,780.5 396.5 2.177.0 Page 2 Volunteer Value (x,2.14 per hour) 548,198.78 far January 2016 S ul;,rne Valley Graffiti Report 1013 2 May June uly ;"1Lig. Spr-. Nov. 1)e.c , of 1I 2012 0 2014 2015 2016 3 5 5 7 13 16 11 7 9 30 14 4 4 10 9 13 5 7 12 4 22 6 10 4 12 6 257 7 6 6 2 4 7 10 S.C.0 .P.F. lrrcldcnt Response Team (SIRT) volunteers contributed rli or1••sccne hours (including travel time) in .1 irin:m, responding to critt,.: �,a,�s motor vehicle accidecll.pi-o idin , trt flit Control.; 7 hours `cte for incidents specified 1) in S1114: i.1 -1C Valley, There were no Special Events in Spokane Valley in January. Total January voic...tce: r i7wir; contributed by SIRT, incl.rc:irg training, revoiisc and special events i.s 526. Abandoned Vehicles tagged by S.C.O_P.F, voluricers impoundment. in Spokane Valley iii December totaled 25 and in January 22 11 vehicle...!-; irr December and 8 in January, respectively, eventually cited and towed. Six hulks wcrc processed irr Deeemhi r and 12 hulks processed int .January. During the month afJan nary, a total of 70 vehicles •. e c pro,,.:essgid. SCOPE LATENT PRINT STATS SCOPE DISAELED PARKING ACTIVITY REPORT TRAINING HOURS SCSO SVPD Tr L AL January 0 29 36 b:. YTD - TOTAL 0 29 36 65 SCOPE DISAELED PARKING ACTIVITY REPORT City of S nkane Valley # of Vol. # of Hrs. 4 of Disabled infractions Issued 6 of Warning', Issued 01 bion - Disabled Infractions Issued Januar 2 11 2 0 0 YTD Total 2 11 2 0 0 Spokane County # of Vol. 4 of lirs. # of Disabled infractions Issued # of Warnings Issued # of Non - Disabled Infractions Issued January 2 26.5 2 0 0 YTD Total 2 26.5 2 0 0 Page 3 OPERATIONS: Drugs and Stolen Vehicle Recovered — In Carly January at ::rlrp:- eertiately 9:45 p.m., Spokane Valley Sheriff's Deputy Jeff Thurman observed a maroon Toyota I{,i`. ; ili an alleyway near Their and Sprague. Knowing numerous stolen vehicles have beer) recovered iii [:, rrti<t_ 1). putt' Thurman also noticed 1hc passenger rear window was broker, out and rect,grae..%1 tee \etiiele as a rci.nrt.: l stolen vehicle. 1k piny Thurman activated his emergency lights to slap the vehicl4. 1-n.I c'.ac° 11-ywLIr- old inale driver :.1lternpted to accelerate and 11 e. With the tires or it e Tov°oli spinning on the coml„etre ii r.. and ick, the driver put the vehicle in reverse, causing 11 Le slide t i _i stop and almost strik4 .1 rc ii.l,:n e The male driver then jumped out of the vehicle as I ).21-roty .1 Heenan ordered him rki SIerp ;grid erirrice K.:11 I ,ado would be deployed if he didn't. The n1uk, stopped, then jumped back the ete.1 begun reaching around the passenger's side floorboa:,,l area, With the hands out of vicw and not knowing his intentions, Deputy Thurman kepi his distance and crelet Lei the male saspcct out of the vehicle; the male complied and was taken into custody without incident. Duriry :t eeircla, Deputy Thurman located a glass pipe with a burnt white crystalline substance irtsidc-take suspect's lei:, front pocket. After being advised ()Lire, H.e.. ee the suspect said he wanted to he honest since Deputy Thurman had treated him well in :lie pass. Ile admitted he hid sonic niethan:l1Iir°r.:rlriiiie on the front passenger's side of the vehicl.:, 1Ie also said he knew the vehicle was stolen, but maintained that he did not steal it. Deputy Tlmiteen located a baggie on the passenger's side floorboard of the vehicle; the white crystalline contcli:4. t,: the bala.t;ie was later field tested, which showed a pres:,iriII *.•,_7 positive result :Or ITlcth,llnpC :taratine, Thu suspect was transported and booked into C'cwn1 v Jail for Pos. e.sion of a Stolen Vehicle and Possession of a Controlled Substance Mciheinpl et ainine, The vehicle, reported stolen earlier in the r eaering,'4 a rete 1 .'.. to ilie CANTICr, Suspect Claims the .Packet lle's Wearing 'Isn't His In eerie January, just after midniEehe Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputy irlre s Wang raotice•JJ ci rii I w.r.kirirr in the griddle of C,i[,ilile Road near Vista ir,;Iirikane ' ` ,1i.:4.. Deputy W4'tirae r.olitacted the antic, :cl}.'i r li Bien why li being contactcc, ltncl a l.e.i for id ratification. The 24 year-old male was identified by a W i:;hr,il";.er. State driver's ]ieclise. Deputy \kei.ria checked the moles in Con ri tion and learned the suspect. had a confirmed misdemeanor warrant for his arrest (Di-1,,iiig \V'1iile License Suspended Degree). Deputy Wang advised the male suspect Ii. -eras under steer,_ :red placed him in handcuffs. Deputy Wang located a white bottle, coii imirily used to conr;rEn Advil, in the male suspect's right front outer coat pocket. Inside the hotllc, Deputy Wang t1„en .1 -lve small baggies containing a white crystal substance along with marijuana and lull l' - ci:aiular pill with no identifying marks. The substance was field towed and showed a l res1I!r pti 4.: _lositive result for methamphetamine. The male suspect was advised if his rights and ..a row,rl to ;rnswer questions; he said he didn't know what the white crystal substance was, He also sertCL1 the jacket he was wearing wasn't his and he borrowed it from his brother's friend. The male suspect waw unable to provide the name of the person who owned the jacket he stated he borrowed. tic was tratiseo ted and booked into the Spokane County .bail for his misdemeanor \ °arrant and for a new charge of Possession of a Controlled Substance -Methamphetamine. Major Crimes Detectives l rive iil2:ming Shooting - Spokane County Sheriff's Office T\•ltlier 6 ':1i11CS Detectives investigated a re•1iureet shoreline. elf rr -esi{'lenge located in the 14100 blod.: o, I:.:r;r Si111ii Avenue in Spokane Val...ti_,-. Ir: rrlid-January :r'. approximately 9:45 a.r-n-, a male called 911 and reported his wife had been .sllr: t- l lig° Leeetle vets transported to a local heseitttl fir treatment prig to the arrival of Spokane V;Iley 11L:iffs 1kr mics. The .;gena: was secured and Mtjer- Crimes Detectives and members or the Forensic Unit'<'c'rc c'_1lleCI t0 the location, hill i...[ information tro:1-, til. husband, who cooperated with investigators, said the shooting. was accidental, but this i -as not l}cctt Page 4 con n t Iw nnnnwtinators. At the hoapital, the female succumbed i1i tier injury and was nr]tiru unci'._ is an ongoing invcstig ion and no additional information is available at 1I 1. ti inn, the husband has not been arrested. Deputies, t':3ptrrli+L- Fleeing Bicyclist — In mid-Tanuary. at 11:15 p.m., Spokiiic Valley 5hcriff's Dnputics D.21 -.2k 1V1.c N'.:tll and Andrew Richmond were patrolling in the arca of 2''d 1-lanaim as a two-man patrol unit. Deputy M Nal] noticed a 22-year-ulc1 mule riding a bicycle 1.vitiwr,ut reflectors and a front light as required. Deputy NlcNall activated the vehicle's emergency lights in an attempt to stop the male suspect, but the suspect continued to travel northbound en Havana before (timing east on Sprague. Even after the deputies activated their siren, the suspect continued to flee down the, middle lane of Sprague. As the deputies continued to follow the male, they noticed what appcarcd to be a weapon in the suspect's right waistband area. Deputy Richmond yelled out of his window and told the suspect he was under arrest and to stop, but he did not comply. The suspect turners. ins.; 1l -in Maple Tree parking lot, followed by Deputy Tyler Kullman who had arrived to assist. 1)cp lrti McNall drove his vehicle around to 2"d Avenue to try and out off the mate's escul e. ?'II tr la c t crashed his bike into a wooden fence. Deputies McNall and Richmond caught up to Ui ni:tl t:4 _,c tried to flee on foot. They again ordered him to the ground and the suspect complicit. \ hi t ii ground, the male began reaching for his waistband and would not bring his hands ou: in:.n1 under iris body. Both deputies struggled and foi 1 t with Incmale and eventually gained control of Iii.- hands, secL:u'ilu2 hillt ir; rote (cuffs. 11 ler.'._ in a siwr'Itlh. wns dorsad in the suspect right waistband 1 iTLIOCS also 104.;ckUcc,1 9',I:I.i:- tll °. lLnmol�l�' LisiX1 to smoke rn'ihainphetan iiri.. and a siv:I11 I111ti!1ti t't'n t.,.11i111 a white crystal int: .1]I}:miInce on thC' 41: p. 1:1. The substance S Iatt i field tcti1.d and sluro.iCl tl presL niptive positivc "x.:1111 ror rrwilia ]11711c.ar-,i ie. The malt= suspent was p7i .idcd LnedI..Ll irL`nnini:]IL at the scene befdil' I7 C' i 11-:tnsportcLi ._1114 bo ked into the Spokane G:1_t11L + Jail for 1',ts:ses.sion of a Controlled Silk;,!lone+_.'..ln1 1ll:ttnn1Lena :i . 0.)hSo-twang a Peace C)Ineer and Resisting Arrest. !'it Bulls Attack Deputy and K9 — in late January, at approximately 12.20 ann., Spokane Valley inn it's deputies responded to a residence located in the 2000 bloc_: u1 Last AIki :fs they ::-tternpt.'cL it: locate a 48 -year-old reale suspect who is well known to dcputics and had a confirmed Ieiony I ), purtment of Corrections (DOC) no bail warrant for his arrest. Deputies set up a perimeter around :hc- residence to block any attempt to flee as Deputy Thurman, joined by his partner K9 Laslo who 'nt, on a leash, knocked on the side door of the residence that led to the carport. The front yard of 111c. residence was enclosed with a chain link fence, but the gate was open. As a male answered the doer. Deputy Thurman could hear dogs inside the residence. He told the male to keep the dogs inside the residence since he had 1(9 Laslc outside. The male exited the residence keeping the dogs c(untairaed inside. Deputy Thurman advised the male of the warrant for the male suspect and that the kr.tipc.ct needed to surrender. As the reale started to go back 1i. ide the residence, Deputy Thurman iLetin reminded him to keep the dogs inside, <\. ic~ n initl.c!: I:ItL•I•. the male and wanted suspect exited Lltn residence while keeping the dogs cont tin,°cl irrsidc..."t 1)cputy Garza began to take the wanted male into custody, a 21 -year-old female exited the front dexo nrthe residence leaving the front door :fide open. Deputy Thurman yc:lcd for her to close the door, but she failed to follow his cc]Inmands. Two dogs, v,•hicli appeared to be pit bulls, e -xi -.cd the residence and charged toward Deputy Thurman and .K 1..I Ire. l)L.puty Thurtrt'tr, tried to rear ::11 i:itlt Laslo to avoid a confrontation, but the dogs continued ti'.clr cl1.1rp.c and viciously began attj].l:ia., The deputies tried to separate and even kick the.di" s `_n stop tIn_ ainfcic, hut the two clogs ceniitit:i.:d to try and bite Laski around his neck and Sid 1~sic tll't:!]Iii:lly exited 11-.L. ',1{.=c1 to Separate the dogs. but was unable to control aces. td one point, K9 1,asio tell to the :ri.otaid on his back with both pit bulls on top of him. Deputy ilium -Lan tried to pick Laslo up, but the pit bulls continued their Page 5 attack. Deputy Thurman pulled 1.)warr. him as onc of die do.LJ:-. 1Ut hlni on the lower leg while the second cominued to around neck trying to scpar:L',e the dos without success, and Laslo's life was in dar ;Is ',veil as his own personal sLifety, 111.2outy Thurman (trey,: lii 90._:apon and tired ane shot. trikirri21 Lite pit bull Lit Wati attacking Laslo's The dog ceased rlic iLinlek, ran off and later Lil,2,1 oil kis injury. Tie continued iiLukng Laslo, but :11;1:2 'Lliorri the residence gained control or the dog_ Deputy Thurman chcc.1:.cd Hislo and found no visible injuries, fie believes the ballistic vest. 'A,earing pi.cvented Laslo from being seriously injured. Deputy 'Thurman received i.lc puncture \.vourd [ower leg during the incident. The female suspect had a confirmed rni.LderilLnnor kvaITLLil IA her L'it and she was transported and booked into the Spokane Count:: trial( transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for Ills folony 1X(' Speed, Alcohol Believed Factors of Serious Injury CiIIkiui - Spokane V:illey SlteriTs Deputi.,-;s and Traffic Unit Investigators responded to a siitg[e vet-icl ! coilb-don on th 1.)01-te:1!-fl. coilicr of 8"1 Avenue and University Road just after 1:00 a.m. '..rt late Ji i.ir in Spokane Wi;iic.-ses told investigators that the Buick Skylark was on ,S1 1 /..t'eriii Li L Ih rate (11 pLL1J as it approached University Road. The vehicle sEti I the intei,scoiun Lird ciL.y.lied ink, a retaining wall on the southeast comer. Both of the aduli fcrtml.t. c.ici:upants recL,ivecl el -11:)[[7. Curing the collision. Investigators believe alcohol and soced voLA-c edntributine. factors. dvi vci faces pending criminal charges, which may include vehicular 111 hill RI1u-L 'Wanted Folort's Attempt ii Flee. Unsuccessful — In late .Ianuary at appr()xiiimich.. 1 0:30 p.m., Spokane VL-n'y l 1)eputk.; Andrew Richmond and Clay 1 illton were p.:111-011 ioLciller in z:vea of .-in1 and HvEjr11 hiii L ic bs-(-1-ved a Nissan S2 [-IL: Accc,Icralc: 11).,7 and 1)i1 to .-;top at the stop i.1 Ii€ deplaie. 1-K:hind 1IR1-1Latira, the J8-y.,...ar-o'd male driver slammed du his an quickly Lurucd. north on 11orld;,1 and aLccicrtit:cl. 1-bc deputies activated en-ILI-gel-revlI ts uid iren. but the male continual io drive rcekles-dy as lie hicd tu flee. ll -e pursuit, LEL_ male driver drove Lti speeds reaching up to 60 11c tried to evade eaptird With very light -vehicle and pedestrian traffic in the .area, Deputies lichmond and Hilton conf iitiLAL the pursuit. As the male approached a dead-end on Ferry, west oC Haven, he ran the vchiLd.e into a large dirt hill and became high centered. Both deputies exited their vehicle and Deputy \vith his weapon drawn and in a low but ready position, began ordering the male suspect to ..-diow his hands. Instead of following the commands, the male suspect quickly exited the vehicle, fac,...d the deputies and quickly reached into his front waistband, appearing to move toward or possibly draw a weapon. The male suspect began to back away before turning and fleeing ori foot, ignoring repeated commands to show his hands and to get on the ground. The deputies chased the male suspect on foot as they told him he was under arrest and to stop, The suspect reached toward his waistband several times as he fled through a large field. Not knowing if he was armed, the deputies decided to stop the foot pursuit and wait for a K9 Unit to assist. A short time later, Deputy Thurman and K9 Laslo, along with severaL other deputies and Spokane Police Officers, arrived in the area to assist. During the K9 search for the male driver, a Spokane Police Officer noticed a mak matching the suspect's description in the area of Haven and Sprague. Afler another foot pun -Alit, SPD Officers took the male suspect into custody at Lacey and Sprague. Aller being advised Iiii ulghts, the male suspect told Deputy Richmond that Moralise he knew he had warrants lor hi. arrest and didn't want to go back to prison. The male raisspect i,Leitowledged his actions t -11s in cLin.:•r. but his freedom was more important. When asked :L.Lboiri id I i ng toward his waistband di. Id of the pursuit, the suspect admitted his actions .woi.c: cow;i..4cni rcaciiinp. -For a weapon, hut 111(..u!,11l his actions would stop the deputies from chating him. A v,LLLipiiit not Waled in t11c waistband, however a krffe was found in his pocket after he was Likeil into custody. Tlic juvL.T,i1c Page () female passenger in the vehicle was not charged and was uninjured, The realer suspect was transpoitcil. °_;ki hooked irLlO the County Jail for tht'- t3Atl l Cliilnv Possession of a Controlled Sul? iane *arrant,alit' new charges of ;1112l,ll}'.iap to E'iuJL , ()b tcui.:141:i._ <ina ReSiStirig AI'rCSt. Murder Suspect Identified - 51,E}k inn Valley SlIcrills Major Crimes Detectives -),artlied .a 3S -year- old male into the Spokane Couitiv ,liai1 in late JEarnaary. The Mak suspec-1 k -Ti.; h.uy'cs_I ;.arith 151 Degr:2e Aggrcavi'acrt h'[urd r, D anie LIC Violence,. stertirt:il:,,t noin .Itc death of a 29 -year-old female victim the previous nij !tt_ [n January, ,just Lbcfor. 7:00 pill., Spokane Valley Sheriff's Deputies responded to a c10rne..-4: viclence c ul. vith <t wcapon I "re r,t)O block of South Bowe in Spokane Valley. \.-.1R.1I deputiet iirnved, they found tlic female victim bleeding acrid unresponsive. They intruccliricly ],..L:gan I[i avirtg eff; ris and were assisted by additional first responders as they a>ri .ci. t_inik.ounutely, t1a`ia cIfur.s were unsa ccc.sul and the victim was pronounced deceased at the scene. The male s,ispti:.I, '4'.n ::Tell on foot, was located. hiding under a. trailer a shorttime later by D'eptitv Hunt and his parnter t und:Lir. The suspect die] not follow commands and hacl to be Ilh s <_;lll} acs•=iaified. He was transported to r loc, l hospital for medical attention and arrested after h'' t'4as released. pot::arty Valley Major Crines Deteco ves and members of the Forensic Unit were out and rcnnainoe; scene throughout t:1L° night. As this is an active investigation, no 't..iiiher information is aV:iil;i'S':a'_ Deputies Save Newborn's Life — In late January at approximately 1:15 a.m., Spokane: `:'alley Sheriffs Del}. iieN Derek lvlcNall and Clay Hilton responded to a medical call nt' a 1icor D.-1 n(11 bre aI iaL i!! tli. a_o�a of the 12900 block of East Mansfield in Spokane Valley. DepuL . l I.Ntlll, Mill. ill [mini; I4, and hip; Field Training Officer, Deputy Hilton, just cleared a call for servie close to the ]Ey 'ration. The deputies responded immediately and were the first to arrive at residence, contacted the obviously worried and panicked parents holding a two-month old infant ,...'ho. ,+,-;,< not breathing, unresponsive and blue in the face. Deputy McNall cittic!tiIy asscs.sed the inIli:at .incl 11 craving efforts while Deputy Hilton attended to the infant's parc1,1.;. Dcput%. \lcNlail's actions, the infant began breathing and crying. Deputy Christopher C3nl:,:,1. also in trainin:,_ rtl d his Field Training Officer, Deputy Justin Palmer, arrived at the scene Its acs '_. along with medics. The infant, who was choking while being fed, appeared unharmed front this terrifying incident. The parents were extremely thankful for the quick rospolis .s and actions; of Deputy McNatl and ]Deputy Hilton that saved their infant's life. Citizens Academy Is Coming Up — The next Citizens Academy takes place. April 41h through the; 27th, meeting every Monday and Wednesday evening from 6-9 p.m. at 2302 N 'Waterworks St. in Spokane. Registration is FREE. Attendees will have the opportunity to discus Officer-II1 n1 id Shooting incidents,. asking the deputies who have been there. about these trrtwie incidents, learn tlae tools your deputies carry, includes like -fire cleino .s1r LtiorLs, participate in hands -oat Iti::lltiiic defensive tactics training, learn about the laws that govern criminal procedure and which sill justify the use of lethal force, and meet and hear l rnrn the investigators that make up the Investigative Regional Response (S.I,R.R.) Team. Class ;i c. is limited so sign up soon by cal Inv_ Deputy Chris Johnston at 477-2592 or entail hien at Ch.Icnhnlslatae taokaneSherilf,or , Comments from former Leff,L'ackes: Dennis Snyder: I have attended an 2 week course eilizeni5 academy and a crime prevention seminar with one of the hosts heing T)c:r uLy Johnston and he is a very. knowledgeable and dedic:ateJ member of DIA. Sheriff's Department as are all the deputies that I have had the pleasure of meeting. Page 7 Jimmie Stutzman: The Citizens Academy was otic i f the BEST forms of Community interaction/education I have ever attended. A vc y informative overview of how these Gallant People Serve our community and The 8 weeks went by far too quickly. Well worth the time spent!! Sheriff's Office Explorers Recognized for I;:suc1Ience - Two of the Spokane County Sheriff's Ogee Explorers returned from the Washington Smite Winter Academy with high praise and awards. The Winter Academy is a week-long training academy for Explorers from across the State of Washington. Approximately 250 Explorers participated in this year's Advanced and Basic Winter Academy hosted in Yakima, Washington, Explorer Bryson Trautman was assigned to the Academy Police Department (APD) which is run like an actual law enforcement agency. The Explorers respond to several different "calls for service" all week long. These calls are designed to have the Explorers put their training to use in a realistic and practical way. The calls span the spectrum of real calls for service, from llamas on the roadway to murder investigations, they may face when they start their careers in law enforcement. Due to Explorer Trautman's professionalism, leadership and outstanding work, he was selected as one of the two Sergeants assigned to APD and he did a great job leading his squad throughout the week. During the academy, Explorer Bryan Hutchins was assigned to the Advanced Academy, which is for more experienced and senior Explorers_ He competed in Firearms Qualifications, Physical Fitness and Academics_ Explorer Hutchins' performance during the academy was exceptional. He was awarded 1 Place for Advanced Male Physical Agility, PI Place for Advanced Firearms end at the completion of the Academy, he was awarded lit Place Overall for the Advanced Academy. '1 Ile Spokane County Sheriffs Office is extremely proud of Explorer Trautman, f xplorer I 1 _,t :h ia.h. tind. our entire Explorer Post. Their dedication to serving our Community while lo lJ' Ci;[HC hart of our law enforcement family should serve as an example for ali of the young leen and wornen in our community. Want to know more about or Explorers Program? Plc ee: i ,i [ their website at http:l/www.sppkaneexplorers.com for information. ********1*********** Page 8 sv Crime Report Date Range: I/1/2016 to 1/31/2026 Year To DateTolals: Ful Year Tonic Regional in.elllge nce Group 9 January- January- Z016 -YTD 2015 -YTD 26i5 1016 21715 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 BURGLARY FORGERY MAL rIMISC1-11EF NON -CRIMINAL PROP OTNL.2. R_RVD VEIi STLVLII THEFT VEH OTHER VEH PRQWL TOTAL PROPERTY CRIMES 71 85 71 85 999 1,167 1,079 1.,030 397 918 60 48 60 48 533 558 693 627 515 341 14D 161 140 161 1,676 1,545 1,624 1,763 1,548 1,177 14 20 14 20 134 151 100 105 160 913 122 132 122 132 1,595 1,449 1,463 1,355 1,114 855 74 28 74- 18 4D9 464 531 433 407 293 71 30 71 30 515 573 596 570 515 478 265 248 1.65 248 3,084 3.096 3,105 2,753 2,407 2,359 21 26 21 26 201 279 ME 2137 294 3 100 134 100 134 1,189 1,196 1,215 1,160 1,48$ 1,195 938 912 939 913 10,437 10,678 10,670 10,031 9,345 8,731 ASS ALILY 51 100 81 100 1,072 1,087 902 391 955 885 DOA,'SLIICIDE 36 2? 36 27 275 222 218 250 208 188 %7V 65 52 65 52 695 485 386 402 498 1,141 HOMICIDE 3 0 3 0 7 3 2 2 3 3 41014Ar 3 4 3 4 28 41 24 15 14 16 MENTAL 38 41 38 41 381 307 268 270 252 289 V,P 15 13 15 13 190 139 156 154 124 128 PE,F?a cTIII:Ti 272 313 272 313 3,494 3,203 2,976 2,901 2372 1,603 R0:1RE R'V 3 13 3 10 90 94 d$ 74 59 57 '-EL; FIARASS 15 12 15 12 11: 132 148 212 162 153 TOTAL MAJOR CRIMES 532 572 532 571 6,335 5,712 5,158 5,177 4,6417 4,464 ADULT R."•r _ 6 7 6 7 60 70 64 75 62 44 0.11 LC ABUSE 3 2 3 2 30 42 26 27 56 115 (1,..:,.r INTFER 14 24 14 24 197 237 236 190 184 206 111E".1ritrI, 2 2 2 2 25 2.g 20 27 17 $ NIDI =S/I-HIL-, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 47 E1.i,[„C.IIL0 47 1 0 1 14 13 13 13 23 23 r,',1LI(o6'lAY 19 32 19 32 409 406 397 530 310 4913 SEX OTHER 7 3 7 3 66 69 45 37 56 215 SEX EGIS r 0 0 0 a 2 0 4 13 2 1 5TA1.N-kk-,c, 1 CI 1 0 16 24 21 24 19 18 SUSP ,'F r5c''•1 52 63 52 63 602 604 440 423 340 215 TOTAL SEX C811,485 104 134 104 130 1,441 1,494 1,266 1,354 1,187 1,387 DRUG 32 35 32 35 379 336 314 424 511 534 15U OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 2 2 TOTAL ITC 32 35 31 35 379 336 314 4244 513 536 TRAFFIC 344 283 344 283 3,476 3,216 3,525 3,957 3,569 3.051 7'DTALTRAFFIC REPORTS 344 283 344 283 3,47 3.216 3,525 3,957 3,569 3,061 TOTAL REPORTS RECEIVED 1959 1,936 1,950 1,936 22,071 71,436 20,943 20,995 19,361 18,199 printed 2„,12/2086 127.43:0 PM RptE111 Page 1 n' 1 CAD Incidents by Cities (Only incidents handled by Spokane County Sheriff's Office Date Range: 1/1/2016 to 1/31/2016 Regional Intelligence Group 9 AH U1 DP FC FF LAI -I LL ML MW RF SCO SPA SPK 5V WAV TOTALS CAD Incidents Self Initiated Incidents Drug Self Int (Patrol) Traffic Stops Traffic Stops (ARST/CIT/IN) TS (Werrants) Calls for Service Alarms Accidents Accidents (ARREST/CIT] Drug calls DV DUI Dill (ArreStj Pursuits Suspicious Activity Vehicle Recovered 911 Abandon Lines Shoplifting All Arrests IARREST/CIT/IN) Crime Check Reports 33 162 217 3 4 3 28 114 83 18 3,102 4 739 5,134 0 9,544 31 43 125 0 2 1 21 74 27 4 1,003 1 661 2,168 0 4,165 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 2 0 12 Fi 15 52 0 0 0 8 30 17 2 393 0 261 L443 13 2227 1 6 20 0 0 0 4 1 5 0 140 0 83 728 0 992 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 1 0 11 33 0 45 2 119 g8 3 2 2 7 40 55 14 2,099 3 '6 2,966 0 5,479 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 30 0 0 84 0 171 0 1.6 2 1 1 0 1 2 6 2 302 0 16 247 0 596 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 22 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 1 0 9 4 1 26 0 37 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 3 3 5 124 1 8 201 0 351 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 11 1 0 56 0 3 42 0 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 37 n 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 6 11 24 0 0 0 2 15 16 4 358 0 57 537 0 1,030 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 6 47 0 70 0 28 11 0 1 2 0 3 4 1 161 0 8 244 0 463 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 57 0 60 6 5 22 0 0 0 4 7 10 3 234 0 120 387 0 1,399 0 0 12 1 2 0 0 5 14 3 461 2 5 553 0 1,459 Printed 2[12/2010 1:54:00 PM VIM] rage 7 pf '[ RMS Crimes by Cities (Only incidents handled by Spokane County Sheriffs Office) Date Range; 1/1/2016 to 1/31/2016 Regional Intelligence Group 9 AH CFI OP FC FF LAH LL ML MW RF SCO SPA SPK SV WAV EOTALS BURGLARY FORGERY MAL MISCHIEF NON -CRIMINAL PROP OTVER RCRVD VEH STL VEH TIIEFT MI OTHER VEH PROWL TOTAL PROPERTY CRIMES O 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 64 0 3 71 0 141 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 57 1 1 60 0 123 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 L 1 1 121 1 2 140 0 269 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 a 0 14 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 67 1 27 127 0 314 Cr n 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 7 74 0 106 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 6 71 0 106 O 0 5 1 a 0 0 1 2 2 125 0 3 265 0 407 O 0 0 d i 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 21 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 104 0 1 100 0 210 0 0 10 1 2 0 0 4 13 5 61S 3 45 938 0 I,636 ASSAULT 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 3 1 57 1 10 R1 0 158 DOA/SUICIDE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 30 0 0 36 0 56 DV 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 97 0 1 65 0 107 HOMICIDE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 KIDNAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 i 0 4 MENTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 21 0 1 38 0 5] MP 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 19 0 0 15 0 36 PERS OTHER 0 0 13 a 1 0 0 4 5 4 196 1 31 272 0 526 RO BERY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 4 TEL-HARA55 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 5 0 0 15 0 24 TOTAL MAIOR CRIMES 0 0 18 0 1 0 0 11. 9 5 355 2 4.4 532 0 990 ADULT RAPE 0 0 a a 0 0 0 0 0 u 7 0 2 6 0 15 CHILD ABUSE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 CUSTINITER 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 1 0 0 20 1 0 14 0 36 IND LIBERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 4 RAPE/CHILD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 RUNAWAY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 33 0 1 19 0 54 SEX OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 7 0 11 STALKING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 SUSP PERSON 0 0 2 0 a 0 0 1 2 1 25 0 7 52 0 95 TOTAL SEX CRIMES 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 3 1 95 1 12 104 0 221 DRUG TOTAL IIF TR RF FJC TOTAL TRAFFIC TOTAL REPORTS RECEIVED O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 12 32 0 53 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 0 a 0 5 0 12 32 0 53 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 164 0 74 344 0 591 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 164 0 74 344 0 591 0 0 35 1 3 0 0 19 15 11 1,251 6 187 1,950 0 3,491 PrInted 2/12)2016 1:55:51 PM RRaloa,. Page 1 of 1 Uly !S M.IeS i b e Map Produceth 12 Feb 2C 16 2016 anuary Commercial Burglary Hotspots Commercial Burglary Low 1. Medium 1.11 High L- 1 [2 2 0 3 C 4+ Prep red By; Regional Intelligence Group 9 Spokane County Sheriff 10 49th z$ 475 1.5 Miles � i I Map Produced' 12 Fch 2016 January Residential Burglary Hotspots Residential Bill -glary Low Medium 1pgh o 4+ Prepared By. Regional In[ellige n€e Group 9 Spokane County Sheriff 0 4.75 la Miles 1 Map Produced: 1 1 Feb 2016 2015 December & 2016January Stolen Vehicle Hotspots Stolen Vehicles NMI Low =Medium High (I 1 c"'_ 2 _) 3 C 4+ Prepared By: Re&ionaI InteIligente Gria up 9 Spokane County Sheriff Vehicle Prowling Low nu Medium High "• 7 C. 2 0 3 C� 41- n F o a Ars I.s 'Ot:s 11 I Map Produced: 12 Feb ]{] 16 2016 January Vehicle Prowling Hots p ots Prepared By: Regional InutIligerwe Group 9 Spokane County Sheriff Fi`cis +fiP_ SlSeslev� Frcierekk 3rd to Traffic Collisions 6 Low ®Medium Low =. Medium H kgh t7 th 1 2 0 3 Q q+ 15 Mdr, Map Produced: 12 Feb 2016 2016 anuary Traffic Collision Hotspots Prepared By: Regional Irttelligerrce Group 9 Spoke C€ unty Sheriff Selected Data for Comparisons R M5 5talaCharts - Spokane Valley Spokane Valley Dispatched Calls Regional Intelligence Group 9 February January March April May June August September October December November :0 2013 — 2014 — 2015 mem 2016 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2013 2746 2383 2882 2978 3165 3795 3491 3529 3127 3016 2753 2773 2014 2702 2550 2992 2935 3369 3291 3847 3593 3279 31169 2715 2584 2015 2995 2658 3209 2971 3473 3639 3929 3917 3852 3675 3104 3029 2016 2966 Printer] 211 212016 12139.013 PM Rpt007 PAge 7 of 28 Selected Data for Comparisons RMS Stats/Charts - Spokane Valley 350 — 300 - 250 200 150 100 50 RegionaI InteIligence Group 9 Spokane Valley Person Cranes January Fat vary r4 Drch Apri May Jena July August September October Novernter t7ecembar 2013 2014 - 2015 - 2015 lamely February March April May June July August September October November Decomhor 2013 223 180 213 256 246 255 278 275 249 243 251 243 2014 270 225 255 273 280 274 335 3311 373 2F 290 279 2015 X1 248 285 261 316 330 346 313 272 272 263 318 21]16 X6 Printed 211'2_P2U1b 12;3W:U5 FM Rta1007 Pagc 15 of 28 Selected Data for Comparisons RMS Stats/Charts- Spokane Valley 1000 800 600 - 400 200 Regional Intelligence .iraup 9 Spokane Valley Property Crimes January February March April tykay June July Augii Ottebar September November December 2013 _ 2014 2015 MEM 2016 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2013 717 599 729 671 634 634 697 710 695 617 71C 689 2014 632 576 758 665 717 7136 727 865 755 683 671 776 2015 706 675 644 566 633 638 686 709 700 733 603 787 2016 707 Panted 211212016 12:39:05 PM fipt647 Page 17 of 29 Selected Data for Comparisons RMS Stats/Cha its - Spokane Valley Spokane Valley Self Initiated Incidents Regional Intelligence Group 9 February January March April May ,ine July August September 4clobar Bova rrhsr Dimember 2013 2{}14 �+ 2[}15 - 2015 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2813 1634 1881 2015 1606 1639 1745 2094 1682 1477 1766 1660 1512 2014 2126 1707 1821 1763 1899 1903 2095 1863 1826 1802 17c74 1723 2015 1923 1795 2038 2001 1606 1638 2073 2003 1958 2072 1715 1G02 2616 2168 Pr i i lied 2/1212015 12:39:05 FM Rpi0Q7 Peg' 20 0128 Selected Data far Comparisons RMS Stats/Cha rts- Spokane Valley 8000 6O41:} - 4000 - 2000 Regional lrite' Iigen ce Group 9 Spokane Valley Total Incidents Jori Ary February March April May Jona July August September October November Dwinii nbGir January February March April May June July August September Oeteber November december 2013 4384 4264 4697 4524 4305 4940 5595 5211 4644 47$2 4413 4285 2014 4528 4257 4823 4696 5258 5194 5403 5486 5105 4871 45E19 4600 2015 4918 4453 5247 4972 5079 5477 6001 5820 5610 5747 4319 4631 2016 5134 2013 2014 2015 2016 Printed 211212016 12:39:05 PM Page 21 of 28 Selected Data for Comparisons RM5 StatsfCharts - Spokane Valley 50 — 40 30 20 -- 10 Regional Intelligence Grou;z 3 Spokane Valley Crime Sex Crimes February January March Apnl May June July August September octane, Iovornber December .- 2013 2014 - 2015 +--� 2016 January February March April May June July August 2epternber October November December 21113 24 23 20 21 44 41 36 37 32 29 33 38 2014 26 38 41 43 42 25 25 33 34 36 39 33 2015 36 36 26 23 42 27 45 32 22 25 21 29 2016 26 Printed 2112x2316 1 r_3y_.Th I'M Rp1067 rage 22 or 28 SpUk ine 1 .� Val ley PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT January 2016 AGREEMENTS FOR SERVICES ADOPTED AND IN OPERATION Contract Name Contractor Contract Total % of Expended as Contract Amount of 1/31/16 Expended Street Maintenance Poe Asphalt $1,366,663.00 $0.00 0.00% Street Sweeping AAA Sweeping $490,200.00 $0.00 0.00% Storm Drain Cleaning AAA Sweeping $189,990.00 $0.00 0.00% Snow Removal Poe Asphalt $140,000.00 $7,328.07 5.23% Roadway Landscaping Senske $57,878.00 $0.00 0.00% Emergency Traffic Control Senske $10,000.00 $0.00 0.00% Litter and Weed Control Geiger Work Crew $60,000.00 $4,147.00 06.90% State Highway Maintenance WSDOT $265,000.00 $0.00** 0.00% Traffic Signals, Signs, Striping Spokane County $632,000.00 $0.00 0.00% Dead Animal Control Brad Southard $20,000.00 $1,865.00 9.32% * Budget estimates ** Does not include January 2016 — waiting on invoices Citizen Requests 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Citizen Requests for Public Works I Total Citizen Requests: Public Works • Submitted 66 Misc Requests 1 uuu°uum IlL Dead Animal Removal 16 16 Roadway Hazard Street Sweeping Sign & Signal Requests 11 1 22 • In Progress 2 0 0 1 1 0 • Resolved 64 16 16 10 0 22 *Information in bold indicates updates 1 WASTEWATER Status of the process can be monitored at: http://www.spokaneriver.net/, http://www.ecy.wa.gov/geographic/spokane/spokane river basin.htm, http://www.spokanecounty.orq/utilities/WaterReclamation/content.aspx?c=2224 and http://www.spokaneriverpartners.com/ STREET MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY The following is a summary of Public Works/Contractor maintenance activities in the City of Spokane Valley for January 2016: • AAA Sweeping began arterial maintenance sweeping. • Snow and Ice operations. • Pothole patching is ongoing. • The Geiger crew completed miscellaneous projects and removed 10,930 lbs of debris from our right of ways. STORMWATER UTILITY The following is a summary of Stormwater Utility activities in the City of Spokane Valley for January 2016: • Worked on updating Stormwater Utility Fee Rolls. • Began work on updating swale inventory and information in GIS, as well as entering stormwater structure information into the GIS system for new 2015 developments and projects. • Assessed stormwater retrofit possibilities with several 2016 pavement preservation projects. • Assisted with Windstorm 2015 response including providing maps of trees down and extension of contracted sweeping services. • Completed work on service contract renewals for Storm drain Cleaning and Street Sweeping Services. • Continued work on service contract renewals for Roadway Landscaping and Weed Control Services. • Continued work on an internal review of the City's Stormwater Program to prepare for probable future audit by the State. • Continued work on various capital improvement projects, (see below). Worked on negotiating grant agreements with Ecology on several projects including, Sprague LID, University to Park; Decant Phase 3; and Stormwater Retrofits with Pavement Preservation Projects. *Information in bold indicates updates 2 CAPITAL PROJECTS ,.1i11ey Public Works Projects Monthly Summary - Design & Construction January -2016 Street Projects 0155 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement #4508 0166 Pines Rd. (SR27) & Grace Ave. Int Safety 0201 ITS Infill Project- Phase 1 0207 Indiana & Evergreen Transit Access Imp 0221 McDonald Rd Diet (16th to Mission) 0234 Seth Woodard Sidewalk Improvements 0236 Fancher Road Bridge #3502 Joint Repair 0237 Appleway Trail - Sullivan to Corbin 0239 Bowdish Rd & 11th Ave. Sidewalk Street Preservation Projects 0226 Appleway Resurfacing, Park to Dishman Mi 0229 32nd Ave Preservation Project 0233 Broadway Ave Street Pres-Sulliv to Moore Saltese Road - Houk Rd to 24th Ave Traffic Projects 0167 Citywide Safety Improvements 0222 Citywide Reflective Signal Back Plates 0228 Transportation Management Center Parks Projects 0227 Appleway S.U.P. - Pines to Evergreen FHWA - BR HSIP FHWA - CMAQ STA - FTA/NF HSIP CDBG COSY COSY TIB - SP FHWA - STP(U) COSY COSY COSY HSIP HSIP COSY FHWA- STP(U) 06/27/14 04/22/16 03/25/16 03/11/16 04/22/16 05/13/16 02/26/16 03/03/17 06/03/16 07/18/14 05/13/16 04/15/16 03/25/16 05/13/16 05/27/16 03/11/16 03/24/17 06/17/16 01/02/17 01/02/17 02/12/16 02/26/16 02/19/16 03/11/16 04/22/16 05/06/16 07/31/15 08/21/15 tbd tbd Local agency work 100 54 09/30/16 $ 15,833,333 95 0 10/01/16 $ 733,086 95 0 12/31/16 $ 327,562 5 0 12/31/16 $ 85,000 O 0 12/31/16 $ 1,853,630 5 0 12/31/16 $ 389,987 100 0 06/01/16 $ 160,000 O 0 12/31/17 $ 2,130,000 O 0 12/31/16 $ 506,342 10 0 12/31/17 99 0 12/31/16 O 0 12/31/16 O 0 12/31/16 $ 1,190,000 $ 1,450,000 $ 450,000 $ 1,090,467 100 80 07/31/16 $ 503,424 O 0 03/01/19 $ 81,000 100 96 02/29/16 $ 45,000 01/12/18 02/02/18 0 0 12/31/18 $ 1,899,252 Design & Construction $ 28,728,083 Design Bid Estimated Total Project Proposed Open % Complete Construction Project # Design & Construction Projects Funding Ad Date Date PE I CN Completion Cost Street Projects 0155 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement #4508 0166 Pines Rd. (SR27) & Grace Ave. Int Safety 0201 ITS Infill Project- Phase 1 0207 Indiana & Evergreen Transit Access Imp 0221 McDonald Rd Diet (16th to Mission) 0234 Seth Woodard Sidewalk Improvements 0236 Fancher Road Bridge #3502 Joint Repair 0237 Appleway Trail - Sullivan to Corbin 0239 Bowdish Rd & 11th Ave. Sidewalk Street Preservation Projects 0226 Appleway Resurfacing, Park to Dishman Mi 0229 32nd Ave Preservation Project 0233 Broadway Ave Street Pres-Sulliv to Moore Saltese Road - Houk Rd to 24th Ave Traffic Projects 0167 Citywide Safety Improvements 0222 Citywide Reflective Signal Back Plates 0228 Transportation Management Center Parks Projects 0227 Appleway S.U.P. - Pines to Evergreen FHWA - BR HSIP FHWA - CMAQ STA - FTA/NF HSIP CDBG COSY COSY TIB - SP FHWA - STP(U) COSY COSY COSY HSIP HSIP COSY FHWA- STP(U) 06/27/14 04/22/16 03/25/16 03/11/16 04/22/16 05/13/16 02/26/16 03/03/17 06/03/16 07/18/14 05/13/16 04/15/16 03/25/16 05/13/16 05/27/16 03/11/16 03/24/17 06/17/16 01/02/17 01/02/17 02/12/16 02/26/16 02/19/16 03/11/16 04/22/16 05/06/16 07/31/15 08/21/15 tbd tbd Local agency work 100 54 09/30/16 $ 15,833,333 95 0 10/01/16 $ 733,086 95 0 12/31/16 $ 327,562 5 0 12/31/16 $ 85,000 O 0 12/31/16 $ 1,853,630 5 0 12/31/16 $ 389,987 100 0 06/01/16 $ 160,000 O 0 12/31/17 $ 2,130,000 O 0 12/31/16 $ 506,342 10 0 12/31/17 99 0 12/31/16 O 0 12/31/16 O 0 12/31/16 $ 1,190,000 $ 1,450,000 $ 450,000 $ 1,090,467 100 80 07/31/16 $ 503,424 O 0 03/01/19 $ 81,000 100 96 02/29/16 $ 45,000 01/12/18 02/02/18 0 0 12/31/18 $ 1,899,252 Design & Construction $ 28,728,083 Street Projects 0123 Mission Ave - Flora to Barker 0141 Sullivan & Euclid PCC 0142 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan 0205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvement 0223 Pines Rd Underpass @ BNSF &Trent 0238 Pines RD Mirabeau Parkway Intersection Stormwater Projects 0193 Effectiveness Study 0198 Sprague, Park to University LID 0199 Havana -Yale Diversion 0200 Ponderosa Surface Water Diversion FHWA - STP(U) FHWA - STP(U) FHWA - STP(U) COSY COSY TIB - UAP Dept of Ecology Dept of Ecology Dept of Ecology Dept of Ecology 08/15/15 12/31/17 08/31/16 12/31/16 tbd 04/15/16 06/30/15 03/01/16 10/31/16 10/31/16 15 80 90 5 0 0 100 30 35 35 $ 517,919 $ 175,260 $ 276,301 $ 51,619 $ 10,000 $ 446,338 $ 300,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Design only $ 1,837,437 *Information in bold indicates updates 3 Design Bid Estimated Total Project Complete Open % Complete Construction Project # Design Only Projects Funding Date Date PE Completion Cost Street Projects 0123 Mission Ave - Flora to Barker 0141 Sullivan & Euclid PCC 0142 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan 0205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvement 0223 Pines Rd Underpass @ BNSF &Trent 0238 Pines RD Mirabeau Parkway Intersection Stormwater Projects 0193 Effectiveness Study 0198 Sprague, Park to University LID 0199 Havana -Yale Diversion 0200 Ponderosa Surface Water Diversion FHWA - STP(U) FHWA - STP(U) FHWA - STP(U) COSY COSY TIB - UAP Dept of Ecology Dept of Ecology Dept of Ecology Dept of Ecology 08/15/15 12/31/17 08/31/16 12/31/16 tbd 04/15/16 06/30/15 03/01/16 10/31/16 10/31/16 15 80 90 5 0 0 100 30 35 35 $ 517,919 $ 175,260 $ 276,301 $ 51,619 $ 10,000 $ 446,338 $ 300,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Design only $ 1,837,437 *Information in bold indicates updates 3 TRAFFIC CIP Projects Staff continues to coordinate with traffic related design and study items as part of CIP projects. The installation of countdown pedestrian timers at traffic signals is on-going (weather permitting). The sign upgrades and bicycle route installations are planned to start in February/March (weather permitting). Specific Studies Staff is coordinating with WSDOT on the Henry Road IJR and the North Spokane Corridor (NSC) IJR. Development Projects Reviewing traffic impact studies and letters for several projects and assisting Development Engineering with the Comprehensive Plan Update. PLANNING AND GRANTS STA Call for Projects, FTA 5310 Grant On December 24th, 2015, STA issued a call for projects for using FTA 5310 grant funds for use on projects that enhance mobility for seniors and for individuals with disabilities. Total funds available for capital projects are about $400,000. After reviewing the grant criteria, staff presented two projects for Council consideration: Sunshine Terrace: 9th Avenue Sidewalk Project, Raymond to University $170,000 Eagle Peak School: Coleman Road Sidewalk Project, 4th to 2nd Avenue $240,000 Council supported these projects and requested that staff pursue these grant funds. The City match on these projects is 20% and applications are due on February 1, 2015. Blake Road Sidewalk, 8th to Appleway Trail Public Works and Community and Economic Development conducted an information meeting on the Blake Road Sidewalk project on January 20th, 2016, to hear neighborhood concerns of people living along Blake Road. People living adjacent to the project are against having sidewalks fronting their property fearing that sidewalks will rouse crime and encourage drivers to speed. There was some confusion as to where the sidewalk would land in relationship to people's front yards and it was concluded that the next step should be for staff to follow up by meeting with the individual property owners in the field. Staff will schedule these meetings with homeowners once the weather improves. The City is pursuing CDBG grant funding for this project for a total project cost of $348,655. If the County funds this project and the City decides to move forward, the project will be constructed in the summer of 2017. *Information in bold indicates updates 4 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: February 23, 2016 Check all that apply: ['consent ❑ old business ® information ['admin. report Department Director Approval: ['new business ['public hearing ['pending legislation ['executive session AGENDA ITEM: 32nd Ave.Preservation Project, Dishman-Mica Road to Pines Road #0229 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council adopted the 2016-2021 Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan on June 23, 2015, Resolution #15-005; Informational Request for Council Action on January 26, 2016 and Admin. Report on February 2, 2016 for the Amended 2016 Transportation Improvement Plan, which included this project. BACKGROUND: The 32nd Avenue Preservation project will place a two-inch asphalt overlay on 32nd Avenue between Dishman-Mica Road and Pines Road. The project includes installation of ADA compliant curb ramps and Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) conduit the length of the project. This project is funded with City Street Preservation funds. Public Works staff designed the project. Bids were advertised on February 12th and are scheduled to be opened on Friday, February 26th. A copy of the bid tabulation will be provided at the March 8th council meeting for award consideration. OPTIONS: Information Only RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Information Only BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The total project budget is $1,570,000. Of the total, $435,000 will be paid out of Fund 301 for the ITS work and the remaining $1,135,000 will be funded from the Street Preservation Fund 311. There are sufficient funds in Funds 301 and 311 to cover the cost for this project. STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Worley, PE — Senior Capital Projects Engineer Eric Guth, PE — Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: Vicinity Map VICINITY MAP f ' 1r SPOKANE RIVER SRO( C0110,6 MTY COLLEGE r—LE MIN 1 F'} PROJECT LIMITS LIBERTY LAK J