The URL can be used to link to this page

2016, 06-28 Regular MeetingAGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING FORMAL FORMAT MEETING Tuesday, June 28, 2016 6:00 p.m. Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers 11707 E Sprague Avenue Council Requests Please Silence Your Cell Phones During Council Meeting CALL TO ORDER: INVOCATION: Pastor Matthew Larson, Advent Lutheran Church PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: ROLL CALL: APPROVAL OF AGENDA: INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: 1. Representatives from Atlas Advertising —John Hohman 2. Oath of Office: City Clerk Administers Oath to Incoming Police Chief Werner COMMITTEE, BOARD, LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS: MAYOR'S REPORT: PROCLAMATION: n/a PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those on this agenda as action items. (Action items include public hearings and those items under NEW BUSINESS. Public Comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.) When you come to the podium, please state your name and city residence for the record and limit remarks to three minutes. 1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. Proposed Motion: I move to approve the Consent Agenda. a. Approval of claim vouchers on June 28, 2016 Request for Council Action Form Totaling:$3,091,406.04 b. Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending June 15, 2016: $378,171.80 c. Approval of May 31, 2016 Council Meeting Minutes, Special 5:00 p.m. Meeting d. Approval of May 31, 2016 Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session e. Approval of June 7, 2016 Council Meeting Minutes, Special 4:30 p.m. Meeting f. Approval of June 7, 2016 Council Meeting Minutes, Regular Formal Meeting NEW BUSINESS: 2. First Reading Proposed Ordinance 16-010, Marijuana Regulations — Erik Lamb [public comment] 3. Proposed Resolution 16-008 Amending 2016 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) — Steve Worley [public comment] 4. Proposed Resolution 16-009 Adopting 2017-2022 Six -Year TIP — Steve Worley [public comment] 5. Motion Consideration: Bid Award, McDonald Road Project — Steve Worley [public comment] 6. Motion Consideration: 2016 JAG Grant Application Approval — Morgan Koudelka [public comment] 7. Motion Consideration: City Manager Recruitment — John Whitehead [public comment] 8. Motion Consideration: Council Appointments of Interim Councilmembers Positions 2 and 5 — Chris Bainbridge [Note: oath of office administered immediately after each appointment] Council Agenda 06-28-16 Formal Format Meeting Page 1 of 2 PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those on this agenda as action items. (Action items include public hearings, and those items under NEW BUSINESS. Public Comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.) When you come to the podium, please state your name and city residence for the record and limit remarks to three minutes. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: 9. Residential Development Standards Update — Mike Basinger, Christina Janssen 10. Sullivan Road Bridge, Max J Kuney, Centennial Trail Change Order — Eric Guth 11. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins INFORMATION ONLY 12. Department Monthly Reports 13. Fiscal Year 2018 Transportation Improvement Board Call for Projects 14. Washington State Department of Transportation Call for Projects: Innovative Safety Program CITY MANAGER COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT General Meetin,i Schedule (meeting schedule is always subject to change) Regular Council meetings are generally held every Tuesday beginning at 6:00 p.m. The Formal meeting formats are generally held the 21-1 and 41 Tuesdays. Formal meeting have time allocated for general public comments as well as comments after each action item. The Study Session formats (the less formal meeting) are generally held the 1st 311 and 5t'—' Tuesdays. Study Session formats DO NOT have time allocated for general public comments; but if action items are included, comments are permitted after those specific action items. NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical, hearing, or other impairments, please contact the City Clerk at (509) 921-1000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made. Council Agenda 06-28-16 Formal Format Meeting Page 2 of 2 ATLAS ADVERTISING Special Presentation: Atlas Advertising SPOKANE VALLEY KICKOF Meeting Agenda I . About Atlas — Experience — Capability — Expertise — References/Stories 2. The Spokane Valley Story — What We Know — Positioning Spokane Val Iey 3. Project Approach — Strategic Approach rAl ATLAS ADVERTISING Experience le, Capability, Expertise, & References Functional Match and Technical Match �/ Strategic Approach LEA RNi Ni ABOUT YOEJ R TEAM ABOUT ATLAS r.s.:TR LAS a ATLAS ADVERTISING About Atlas 1. We are one of the few agencies in the world that focuses exclusively on the economic development marketing industry as a whole. Our complete attention is on the evolving needs of economic development prospects, stakeholders and staff. 2. Led more economic development marketing assignments than any other firm in the country in the last 10 years. 47State4 6Counfrie4 1 9 1 EXCLUSIVE OJPARTNER IEDC HIGH PERFORMANCE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MARKETING FIRM Comnuuillie4 a ATLAS ADVERTISING Atlas Advertising Key Staff Guillermo Mazier - Partner, Strategic Accounts - Former economic developer and tourism marketer for the Costa Rican Investment and Trade Development Board - Managed economic development and tourism campaign for Tortugero, CR - Industry speaker, strategy and digital marketing specialist Ben Wright - CEO - Founded company in 2001, based on a passion for places - Former Chief Economist, Metro Denver EDC - The industry's leading innovator in linking technology, place marketing and branding, and economic development Tamara Haynes - coo - Former Senior Vice President at Oppenheimer Funds - More then 18 years of operational experience - Focus on client -centric service models - Leading and developing staff toward efficiency and efficacy Atlas Advertising Key Staff a ATLAS ADVERTISING Bradley Hein, Associate Creative Director - More then 18 years of strategic advertising experience marketing places, tourism, and human resources (just to name a few!) - Main objective is to provide and lead effective creative communication that will move people and propel business - Led Wayne County and Richardson, Texas Talent Attraction initiatives Sandy Hazzard, Senior Project Manager - Experience in managing local municipalities to statewide tourism efforts - Managed over $8.6M on an annual basis - Managed Richardson, Texas Talent Attraction initiatives Atlas Experience Nationally ENTERPRI FLORIDA.. Charleston COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT a ATLAS ADVERTISING INVESTN AGARA DEGC Zia SAN FRANCISCO Of (ice of Economic and Woi kiorce Development M\MIDDA DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THE � COLUMBUS REGION We're all business. Greater Phoenix ECONOMIC COUNCIL SAVANNAH Economic Development Authority G R E A T E R OMAHA C HAM B E R choose: newjersey Highly educated, perfectly located. SouthCarolina Department of Commerce A National Perspective on place marketing Tourism Can ¶1ncrecie Commwtiti1j Priperitqj Drives resident oride in the communiy The Role of Tourism in an Economy A visitor's $ im °acts the community's economic Sotto m line 11111 Tourism $ drive ousiness c row -h in I the communis A Visitor Re °eat tourist kl". Move or start a ousiness (I 11 Of Spokane Valley Potential wo rco rce Creates a vibrant and prosperous Spokane Valley CIO ATLAS ADVERTISING ?67ECT 4??6AcU F�*: CITY 6F P6KANE VALLEY 1. PRIMARY MARKET RESEARCH Determine awareness, perceptions among current and prospective businesses. 3. MARKETING PLAN Five year strategic marketing plan that promotes Spokane Valley to target audiences. 2. CREATIVE CAMPAIGN DEVELOPMENT World class creative that highlights the City's assets. From initial ideas to production and placement. 4. ANALYZE AND OPTIMIZE Establish clear goals to measure Return On investment and execute additional marketing. CI ATLAS ADVERTISING Measuring Spokane Valley Project Return on Investment Detailed, real-time metrics for: ❑ Site traffic details and analytics ❑ Total impressions ❑ Click through rate (CTR) ❑ SEM performance ❑ Opt -in conversions ❑ Downloads ❑ Conversions ❑ Leads ❑ Length of sales cycle Monthly Website Visitors Monthly Interactions wdh Ttansacnonal Content Monthly Referrals to Accnmmodntmns & Attractions Taos Tourism Marketing Impact 7,847 18,442.E Total Acbw Note Rooms New Hotels by 2010 2,369 3 Accommodations b Food Service Reredoe • Sept 2015 Entertainment 8 Food Serv,ce Jobs - 03 2015 $124,847 124,847 lodgersTax Revenue Ap,il 2015 March 2015 3,659_-_- 97,249. a ATLAS ADVERTISING Implementation Timeline ATLAS Spokane Valley 2016 Timeline 2016 June July August September October November December 13 20 27 4 11 18 25 1 8 15 22 29 5 12 19 26 3 10.17 24 31 7 14 21 28 5 12 19 26 Client kickoff Receive client initiation document Travel to Spokane Stakeholder survey close Stakeholder survey presentation of results Strategic marketing plan development Strategic marketing plan presentation* Client approval of marketing plan Media pian development Media plan presentation Client approval of media plan Brand storm, logo and tagline development Brand storm, logo and tagline development presentation" Creative campaign development Creative campaign presentation Client approval of creative campaign Media placement** Marketing collateral development*** 'Presentation based on client/council availability "Media placement timeframe dependant upon marketing strategy and client approval "'Marketing collateral to be determined by client and Atlas once marketing plan is approved. Appropriate timeline will follow. YOUR ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS Questions? Comments? Contact Us. Ben Wright 303.292.3300 x 210 1860 Blake St., Denver, CO 80202 benw(a7Atlas-Advertis i ng.com www.Atlas-Advertising.com Linkedln Profile1 Linkedln Group B Slidespace CI ATLAS ADVERTISING CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 28, 2016 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: II4 consent E] old business El new business ❑ public hen ring AGENDA ITEM TITLE: A■proval of the Following Vouchers: VOUCHER LIST VOUCHER NUMBERS 06/0212016 38525-38554; 531160019; 531160044 06/06'2016 5490; 5501-5503; 5515; 38555-38556 06/0612016 38557 06/070016 38558-38584 06./O92116 38585-38607; 603160025 06/1.1.2016 6614-6652 06/15771116 38608 06/15x2(}16 38609 06/16'2()16 38610 06/16.2016 38611-38643 06/16.'2016 38644-38676 06120x2016 38677 \]'.IirEL itLi� TOTAL AMOUNT .i _lri;jll (t $7.857.00 $32,496.55 $7,779.34 $2,1.971.60 $I 3.61: 51 $65.7,4r7 (r $5,700.00 114.. Nl'P TOTAL: $3.091,1,76.0.1 ;rl Fund 1\ i.irroeu,s1, 6 n�i r n ti,'e iiclici` Lists Other Funds 1111 S'r.ctFund 1'P.iFI: 11115 -1 lcirGl i:1,-•icl Wax 106 id W.r.3te 120 - CenterPlacc.: t. )Dern".ing 1..1-Sev<<iei I tiw.rf Stabi]i�rU.it,ll 1��:,cri•c 122 - 1a Tilts Weather 1 t.'k. it 1 ic.ilitFc 1tc171,c� 'nr'ill 2I::I ]l'1•t � ivice 31.11 ]dl•:1:.1. 1 Capital I'ro.j.:c:s 302 - Iti l '1 t.' Ltirdl l'r lj cts 303 - Street Capital Projects 309 - Parks Capital Grants 310 -Civic Bldg Capital Projects 311 --Pavement Preservation 312 -Capital Reserve 402 -- Stortnwater Management 403 -Aquifer Protection Area 501 -- Equipment Rental & Replacement 502 - Risk Management #001 - General Find 001.011.000.511. (lily ('.1:r i it 001.013.000.513. (a:itti' 0101.013.015.515. Legal 001.016.000. Public Safety" 001.018.013.513. Deputy r it}' Maria�:ter 001.018.014.514. 001.018.016 ~13. ]111nnir .tcr.ources 001.032.000. 1'r. I,lic; Works 001.058.050.558, 1.:11) - _\dministratioi:. 001.058.051.558. C111) Development 001.058_055.55S. CED lac°-::cep:ucnl Service:i-1.:n4:ine ring 001.058.056.558. (.1:,1]- 1)elopmcrit servires-PIanninu• 001.058-057.558 CED- 13uiltliii 001.076.000.576. Parks & Ree -Adm i Tit ral iorl 031.076.300.576. Park, & Ree-Mai1,1'I',:if'c� 001.076.301.571. Park r Itcc-Reciva(::on 001.076.302.576. Park; & Rec.- Aqua! 001..076.304.575. Parks & Rcc . n i:ir (.:enter 001.076.305.571. Parks & 001.090.000.511. General C,c'. l Comic iI rd. t,..A1 001.090.000.514. Cleneral (ii>} "1-".' inslnCC r•e..:ated 001.090.000.517, CicnL:1al (r•'4 `t-Lnrn]oyee supply 001.090.000.518. Cirll�r,jl {ir:v''t- :�r'lll li{:id r�'ite5 001.090.000.519. General Gov't-Other::r.,�'�.: 001.090.000.540. General Gov't -Transportation 001.090,000.550. General Govt -Natural & Economic 001.090.000.560. General Gov't -Social Services 001.090.000.594. General Gov't -Capital Outlay 001.090.000.595. General Gov't-Pavernent Preservation RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve attached list of claim vouchers. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.] STAFF CONTACT: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: Voucher Lists vchiist 06/02/2016 10:16:27AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 1 Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 38525 6/2/2016 002931 ALL WESTERN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 38526 6/2/2016 000168 BLACK BOX NETWORK SVC 38527 6/2/2016 002562 CD'A METALS 38528 6/2/2016 000101 CDW-G 38529 6/2/2016 000322 CENTURYLINK 38530 6/2/2016 000683 DAVID EVANS & ASSOCIATES 38531 6/2/2016 002604 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC 38532 6/2/2016 000734 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 38533 6/2/2016 004165 EXPRESS SERVICES INC 38534 6/2/2016 002507 FASTENERS INC 38535 6/2/2016 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 102747 SPO -068408 058999 CXG3585 22=2303 DCT5771 DDB7510 MAY 2016 375845 375846 78504585 FundlDept Description/Account Amount 101.000.000.542 001.090.000.518 101.000.000.542 001.076.099.576 001.090.000.518 001.076.099.576 001.076.099.576 001.076.000.576 101.042.000.542 311.000.221.595 001 090.000 548 RE-313-ATB60516046 101.042.000.542 RE-313-ATB60516052 101.042.000,542 17329227-7 54602980.001 SUPPLIES: PW PHONE REPAIR SERVICE SUPPLIES: PW IT SUPPLIES IT SUPPLIES IT SUPPLIES IT SUPPLIES Total : Total : Total : Total : 2016 PHONE SVCS: ACCT 509 Z14 - Total : SPV TRAFFIC SERVICES 2016-17 0221 -TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS Al Total : COMPUTER LEASE 001-8922117-0( Total : REIMBURSE TRAFFIC SVCS MAINZ REIMB ROADWAY MAINT 001.032.000.543 EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 101.042.000.543 SUPPLIES: PW 45611 311.000.233.595 LEGAL PUBLICATION 45698 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION Total : Total : Total : 334.06 334.06 738.06 738.06 79.56 79.56 128,45 39.03 478.83 456.31 1,102.62 528.15 528.15 7,852.05 10.777.87 18,629.92 1.049.27 1049.27 1 370.57 5.510.88 6.881.45 1.014.00 1,014.00 96.48 96.48 115.20 48.00 Page: 1 vchlist 06/0212016 10:16:27AM Voucher List Page: 2 Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 38535 6/212016 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC (Continued) 45700 001.058.056.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 79.05 45701 001.058.056.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 83.30 Total : 325.55 38536 612/2016 002568 GRANICUS INC 76433 001.011.000.511 MAINTENANCE FOR JUNE 2016 777.16 Total : 777.16 38537 6/2/2016 000002 H & H BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC. 314663 001.058.057.558 COPIER COSTS 19.33 314664 001.058.057.558 COPIER COSTS 2.61 315008 001.013.000.513 COPIER COSTS 278.92 315009 001.013.000.513 COPIER COSTS 30.14 315012 001.013.015.515 COPIER COSTS 91.36 315013 001.013.015.515 COPIER COSTS 13.45 315021 001.058.050.558 COPIER COSTS 187.03 315022 001.058.050.558 COPIER COSTS 38.75 315025 001.018.016.518 COPIER COSTS 105.35 315026 001.018.016.518 COPIER COSTS 8.25 315099 001.076.000.576 COPIER COSTS 482.13 315100 001.076.000.576 COPIER COSTS 22.87 315126 001.058.057.558 COPIER COSTS 5.55 Total : 1,285.74 38538 6/212016 003297 HIGGINS, LEWIS ROD EXPENSES 001.011.000.511 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 102.64 Total : 102.64 38539 6/2/2016 001728 HP FINANCIAL SERVICES CO 600491846 001.090.000.548 SCHEDULE 572DD016 745.84 600492808 001.090.000.548 SCHEDULE 572E3651 830.28 Total : 1,576.12 38540 6/212016 000864 JUB ENGINEERS INC. 0100802 101.042.000.542 2016 TIP MAINTENANCE & UPDATE 8,779.21 0100842-1 311.000.233.595 0233 -ON CALL DRAFTING 2,484.75 0100842-2 303.000.201.595 0201 -ON CALL DRAFTING 595.32 0100842-3 303.000.238.595 0238 -ON CALL DRAFTING 447.26 0100842-4 311.000.235.595 ON CALL INSPECTION & DRAFTINC 4,377.91 Total : 16,684.45 Page: 2 vchlist 06/0212016 10:16:27AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 3 Bank code:: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 38541 6/2/2016 004632 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS 44044836 38542 6/2/2016 000636 MOORE IACOFANO GOLTSMAN, INC. 0044245 38543 6/2/2016 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 839395631001 840272159001 840272170001 841348120001 841353678001 38544 6/212016 000307 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER 38545 6/2/2016 002836 PALADIN DATA SYSTEMS CORP. 38546 6/2/2016 000019 PURFECT LOGOS LLC 38547 612/2016 002520 RWC GROUP 38548 6/2/2016 005038 SCHAEFFER MFG COMPANY 38549 6/2/2016 004535 SHRED -IT USA LLC 38550 6/2/2016 000308 SPOKANE CO PROSECUTINGATTY 38551 6/2/2016 000658 SPOKANE CO SUPERIOR COURT 38552 612/2016 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER MAY 2016 240314 43745 29725N BXW 1435 -INV 1 9410787143 APRIL 2016 3550.273 40100857 Fund/Dept 001.076,305.575 309.000.227.595 001.090.000.518 001.090.000.519 001.090.000.519 001.076.302.576 001.076.301.571 Description/Account Amount TELECOM SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES: IT OFFICE SUPPL;ES: IT OFFICE SUPPLES: IT OFFICE SUPPLIES: PARKS OFFICE SUPPL ES: PARKS 001.016.000.586 STATE REMITTANCE 001.058.057.558 TRAINING 001.013.000.513 SIGN 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 001.090.000.518 001.016.000.586 DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION Total : Total : Total Total : Total : Total : Total : Total : Total : CRIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION F Total : 001.013.015.515 FILE COMPLAINT Total : 1,158.17 1,158.17 17,633.03 17,633.03 152.17 26.78 29.11 27.10 23.84 259.00 46 752.51 46.752.51 800.00 800.00 38.05 38.05 588.89 588.89 463.13 463.13 218.82 218.82 656.28 656.28 240.00 240.00 313.000.215.594 SEWER PLAN REVIEW FEE - NEW 100.00 Page: 3 vchlist 06/02/2016 10:16:27AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 4 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 38552 6/2/2016 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER (Continued) 42000270 38553 6/2/2016 000311 SPRINT 959698810-102 38554 6/2/2016 001885 ZAYO GROUP LLC MAY 2016 531160019 5/31/2016 004324 U.S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION JUNE 2016 280737 531160044 5/31/2016 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 9290200938 32 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 001.016.000.554 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICE JUNE Total : Total : Total : 001.058.057.558 001.090.000.518 204.204.000.592 001.016.000.521 GPS PHONE MAY 2016 DARK FIBER LEASE LTGO REFUNDING BONDS 2014 Total LE CONTRACT BILLING MAY 2016 Total : Bank total : 20,517.41 20, 617.41 70.55 70.55 253.01 253.01 110,050.00 116,050.00 1,467,372.00 1,467,372.00 1,724,376.08 32 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 1,724,376.08 Page: 4 vchlist 06/06/2016 11:07:09AM Voucher List Page: Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 5490 6/3/2016 000165 DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS Ben67399 001.231.15.00 PERS: PAYMEN` 92,340.85 Total : 92,340.85 5501 6/3/2016 000048 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS, 401A PL+ Ben67401 001.231.14.00 401A: PAYMENT 33,395.80 Total : 33,395.80 5502 6/3/2016 000682 EFTPS Ben67403 001.231.11.00 FEDERAL TAXES: PAYMENT 36,585.06 Total : 36,585.06 5503 6/3/2016 000145 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS, 4F Ben67405 001.231.18.00 457 DEFERRED COMPENSATION: I 7.152.89 Total : 7,152.89 5515 6/3/2016 000682 EFTPS Ben67409 001.231.11.00 FEDERAL TAXES: PAYMENT 984.13 Total : 984.13 38555 6/3/2016 000120 AWC Ben67395 001.231.16.00 HEALTH PLANS: PAYMENT 120,942.95 Ben67407 001.231.16.00 HEALTH PLANS (COUNCIL): PAYME 7,817.98 Total : 128,760.93 38555 6/3/2016 000699 WA COUNCIL CO/CITY EMPLOYEES Ben67397 001.231.21.00 UNION DUES: PAYMENT 2538.01 Total : 2,538.01 7 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 301,757.67 7 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 301,757.67 Page: .. vchlist 06/06/2016 1:18:02PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept DescriptionlAccount Amount 38557 6/6/2016 005050 OGDEN MURPHY WALLACE PLLC CONTRACT 001.013.015.515 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3;000.00 1 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 1 Vouchers in this report I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Total : Bank total : Total vouchers : 3,000.00 3,000.00 3; 000,00 Page: vchlist 06/0712016 11:32:04AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 38558 6/7/2016 000197 ACRANET 38559 6/7/2016 000150 ALLIED FIRE & SECURITY 38560 6/7/2016 001081 ALSCO 38561 6/7/2016 000271 BAINBRIDGE, CHRISTINE 38562 6/7/2016 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 1163 001.018.016.518 EMPLOYEE BACKGROUND CHECK Total : IVC1036991 JC1020164 LSPO1762251 Expenses 9753572 50136371 50137406 50137438 50137499 50137533 38563 6/7/2016 000148 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORMS & EQUIP 005390648 38564 6/7/2016 001169 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY May 2016 38565 6/7/2016 003317 COEUR D' ALENE PRESS, SHOSHONE R 4967098 5020683 38566 6/7/2016 000326 CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION #19 38567 6/7/2016 004538 DOWGIN, MATT May 2016 001.076.305.575 001.016.099.594 KEYS FOR CENTERPLACE DELIVERY AND INSTALLATION OF Total : 001.016.000.521 FLOOR MAT SERVICE AT PRECINC Total : 001.013.000.513 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 LINEN SERVICE AND LINEN SERVICE AND LINEN SERVICE AND LINEN SERVICE AND LINEN SERVICE AND LINEN SERVICE AND 001.016.000.521 POLICE EMBLEMS Total : SUPPLY AT C SUPPLY AT C SUPPLY AT C SUPPLY AT C SUPPLY AT C SUPPLY AT C Total : Total : 001.058.056.558 PETTY CASH:13898,13900,14204,0; Total : 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 NORTH IDAHO BUS. JOURNAL AD\ NORTH IDAHO BUS, JOURNALADI Total : 001.076.305.575 UTILITIES: CP AND PARKS Total : Expenses 001.013.015.515 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total 133.00 133.00 85.23 6.343.46 6,428.69 20.39 20.39 165.49 165.49 130,35 26.09 337.73 109.38 298.04 104.29 1;005.88 491.32 491.32 16.98 16.98 271.00 271.00 542.00 829.18 829.18 15.66 15.66 Page: vchlist 06/07/2016 11:32: 04AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 2 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor invoice 38568 6/7/2016 000278 DRISKELL, CARY 38569 6/7/2016 000246 EAST SPOKANE WATER ❑IST #1 38570 6/7/2016 004125 IBEX FLOORING LLC 38571 6/7/2016 001635 ISS FACILITY EVENT SERVICES 38572 6/7/2016 003185 LAMB, ERIK 38573 6/7/2016 001944 LANCER LTD 38574 6/7/2016 004926 LE CATERING CO 38575 6/7/2016 002534 PEAK SOFTWARE SYSTEMS 38576 6/7/2016 004943 SMARTLITE 38577 6/7/2016 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST #3 Expenses May 2016 7947 1038783 Expenses 0459262 Contract #1 Contract #1 Contract #10 17175 152859 154219 May 2016 38578 6/7/2016 001083 STANDARD PLBG HEATING CONTROLS 54464 38579 6/7/2016 003532 STERICYCLE COMMUNICATION SOLUT 8010333158 Fund/Dept 001.013.015.515 001.076.300.576 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.013.015.515 Description/ACCOunt Amount EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : WATER CHARGES FOR EDGECLIF Total : CENTERPLACE FLOORING SUPPL Total : EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLAI Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 001.076.305.575 BUSINESS CARDS 001.076.305.575 001.076.099.575 001.076.099.575 001.076.302.576 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.300.576 001.016.000.521 001.076.305.575 Total : Total : CATERING INVOICE: RIVERSIDE H. CATERING INVOICE: DELTA DENTA CATERING INVOICE: OLSON WEI71 Total : SWIM PASS "KEY FOBS" FOR POO Total : ADVERTISING FOR CENTERPLACE ADVERTISING FOR CENTERPLACE Total : WATER CHARGES: PARKS Total : MAY 2016 MONTHLY MAINT: PRECI Total : ANSWERING SVC CENTERPLACE 39.15 39.15 413.12 413.12 416.04 416.04 184.37 184.37 13.50 13.50 82.06 82.06 306.48 837.57 1,000.00 2,144.05 700.00 700.00 550.00 550.00 1,100.00 144.39 144.39 605.46 605.46 39.44 Page: — 2 ' vchlist 06107/2016 11: 32: 04AM Voucher List Spokane Valley C Page: Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 38579 6/7/2016 003532 003532 STERICYCLE COMMUNICATION SOI (Continued) 38580 6/7/2016 002306 TERRELL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, MIC 2579 38581 6/7/2016 000066 WCP SOLUTIONS 9580700 9595938 38582 6/7/2016 003610 WEST PLAINS CHAMBER OF COMMERC June 38583 6/7/2016 004382 WSAE 38584 6/7/2016 000487 YMCA OF THE INLAND NW 27 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 27 Vouchers in this report 20150582 20150583 April 2016 Fund/Dept 001.076.000.576 001.076.305.575 001.016.000.521 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001 076.305.575 001.076.302.576 Description/Account Amount Total : 14-007B DISC PLAYGROUND SPLA Total : SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE SUPPLIES FOR PRECINCT Total : MEMBERSHIP BREAKFAST FEE Total : 2016 ANNUAL CONVENTION REGI 2016 ANNUAL CONVENTION RESE Total : OPERATING EXPENSES FOR PERI Total : 39.44 907.00 907.00 884.55 518.50 1,403.05 25.00 25.00 305.00 300.00 605.00 4,924.00 4,924.00 Bank total : 23,394.22 Total vouchers : 23,394.22 Page: �3� vchlist 06/0912016 12:32:20P M Voucher List Spokane Valley i65 Page: 1 Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 38585 6/9/2016 002517 BROWN BEARING CO INC 38586 6/9/2016 001157 COUNTRY HOMES POWER EQUIP 38587 6/9/2016 003255 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS 38588 619/2010 002157 ELJAY OIL COMPANY 38589 6/9/2016 003392 EPICENTER SERVICES LLC 38590 6/9/2016 004165 EXPRESS SERVICES INC 38591 6/9/2016 000333 FALCO'S INC. 38592 6/9/2016 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 38593 6/9/2016 002975 FREEDOM SALES AND SUPPLY LLC 38594 6/9/2016 002992 FREEDOM TRUCK CENTERS 38595 6/9/2016 001253 GORDON THOMAS HONEYWELL 38596 6/9/2016 000007 GRAINGER 5173156 541913 580062 4251271 2016-15 17358737-9 BLD -2016-1734 132169 45733 45734 45736 2016368 PC001341180:01 May16 1042 9123483100 Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 101.042.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 101.042.000.543 101.042.000.542 106.000.000.537 TOWER RENTAL Total Total : Total : FUEL FOR MAINTENANCE SHOP Total : PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 001.032.000.543 EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 001.058.059.322 001.018.013 ,513 001.013.000.513 001.013.000.513 001.058.056.558 001.090.000.519 101.000.000.542 001.011.000.511 402.402.000.531 Total : Total : REFUND OF MECHANICAL PERMIT Total : ADVERTISING LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION FIRST AID SUPPLIES SUPPLIES: PW GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS SUPPLIES: STORMWATER Total : Total : Total : Total : 25.74 25.74 354.86 354.86 208.13 208.13 57.20 57.20 816.75 616.75 1,014.00 1,014.00 62.00 62.00 347.5U 29.75 25.00 77.35 479.60 8.81 8.81 42.39 42.39 3,412.54 3,412.54 22.22 Page: vchlist 06109/2016 12: 32:20PM 1/ Voucher List Page: Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 38596 6/9/2016 000007 000007 GRAINGER (Continued) Total : 22.22 38597 6/9/2016 000321 GREATER SPOKANE INC 107622 001.011.000.511 MEMBER REGISTRATION: D GRAFI 25.00 Total : 25.00 38598 6/9/2016 000692 GUS JOHNSON FORD 845170 402.402.000.531 47362D 2009 FORD F-550 SERVICE 647.54 Total : 647.54 38599 6/9/2016 002203 NAPA AUTO PARTS 738775 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES FOR MAINTENANCE SH 14.13 739959 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: MAINTENANCE SHOP 18.85 Total : 32.98 38600 6/9/2016 000239 NORTHWEST BUSINESS STAMP INC. 97020 001.018.16.518 NAME BADGE 16.85 Total : 16.85 38601 6/9/2016 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 838110482001 001.032.000.543 OFFICE SUPPLIES: PW 27.71 840372857001 001.032.000.543 OFFICE SUPPLIES: PW 2.05 840372857002 001.032.000.543 OFFICE SUPPLIES: PW 27.71 840373185001 001.032.000.543 OFFICE SUPPLIES: PW 10.82 841837137001 001.032.000.543 OFFICE SUPPLIES: PW 13.88 843826572001 001.013.000.513 OFFICE SUPPLIES: LEGAL 18.77 843873066001 001.018.016.518 OFFICE SUPPLIES: HR 32.60 Total : 133.54 38602 6/9/2016 000058 DMA A500163 001.018.016.518 NEW HIRE PHYSICALS FOR MAY 200.00 Total : 200.00 38603 6/9/2016 004130 PACIFICA LAW GROUP LLP 6-2-16 313.000.000.592 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 20,727.50 Total : 20,727.50 38604 6/9/2016 000675 RAMAX PRINTING & AWARDS INC 28286 001.011.000.511 PLAQUE & CLOCK 188.32 Total : 188.32 38605 6/9/2016 000065 STAPLES ADVANTACF 3304003960 001.090.000.519 OFFICE SUPPLIES: FRONT DESK 68.47 3304003961 001.011.000.511 OFFICE SUPPLIES 52.30 Total : 120.77 38606 6/9/2016 000335 TIRE-RAMA 8080043367 101.042.000.542 SERVICE: 2008 FORD F150 40209( 42.67 Page: vchlist 0610912016 12:32:20PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 3 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 38606 6/9/2016 000335 TIRE-RAMA 38607 6/9/2016 000295 VALLEYFEST 603160025 6/3/2016 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 24 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 24 Vouchers in this report I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Fund/Dept (Continued) 8080043472 101.042.000.542 SEPTEMBER 2016 001.018.013.513 MAY 2016 001 016.000.512 Description/Account Amount SERVICE: 2007 CHEVY COLORADO Total : BOOTH RENTAL FOR VALLEYFEST Total : SPOKANE COUNTY SERVICES Total : Bank total : Total vouchers : 33.86 76.53 35.00 35.00 146,722.20 146,722.20 175,430.47 175,430.47 Page: vchlist 06/1312016 10:54:12AM I3 Voucher list Page: 1 Spokane Valley Bank code : pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 6614 6/13/2016 005073 ARP, ANN MARIE PARKS REFUND 001.237.10,99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREENACRES 75.00 Total : 75.00 6615 6113/2016 005063 AVISTA UTILITIES PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: ROOMS 110 & 2,104.00 Total : 2,104.00 6616 6/13/2016 005072 BLACKHART, ALLYSON PARKS REFUND 001.237.10,99 DEPOSIT REFUND: TERRACE VIEV 75.00 Total : 75.00 6617 6/13/2016 005070 BUFFKIN, SHELLtE PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: VALLEY MISSIC 75.00 Total : 75.00 6618 6/13/2016 005068 CARD, JENNICA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: VALLEY MISSIC 75.00 Total : 75.00 6619 6/13/2016 001871 CHRIST CHURCH PARKS REFUND 001,237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREENACRES 300,00 Total : 300,00 6620 6/13/2016 005060 CRAIG, TERRY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU ME, 75.00 Total : 75.00 6621 6/13/2016 005079 DELATEUR, RACHEL PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: DISCOVERY PL 75.00 Total : 75.00 6622 6113/2016 005059 FIRZLAFF, CORY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: SULLIVAN PARI 75.00 Total : 75.00 6623 6/13/2016 005055 FORSMAN, JOHN PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: VALLEY MISSIC 300.00 Total : 300.00 6624 6/13/2016 005071 GARCIA, VERONICA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: TERRACE VIEV 75.00 Total : 75.00 6625 6/13/2016 005058 GREEN, ANGELA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: VALLEY MISSIC 75.00 Total : 75.00 6626 6113/2016 005057 HANES. KATHLEEN PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: SULLIVAN PARI 75.00 Page: vchlist 06/13/2016 10:54:12AM '9 _2, Voucher List Page: Spokane Valley Bank code : pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept DescriptionlAccount Amount 6626 6113/2016 005057 005057 HANES, KATHLEEN (Continued) Total : 75.00 6627 6/13/2016 005052 HARMON, BART PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: FIRESIDE LOU 190.00 Total : 190.00 6628 6/13/2016 004345 IBEW LOCAL #73 PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: VALLEY MISSIC 75.00 Total : 75.00 6629 6/1312016 005066 LATIMER, CAMMY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: EDGECLIFF PA 75.00 Total : 75.00 6630 6/13/2016 005078 LEES, MARCUS PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: DISCOVERY PL 75.00 Total : 75.00 6631 6/13/2016 005081 LESTER, JADA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU ME0 75.00 Total : 75.00 6632 6/13/2016 005065 MARCHAND, TINA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREENACRES 75.00 Total : 75.00 6633 6113/2016 005077 MURPHY, AMANDA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: DISCOVERY PL 75.00 Total : 75.00 6634 6/13/2016 005082 NADVORNICK, AMY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU MEI 300.00 Total : 300.00 6635 6/1312016 005053 OLSON, KARISSA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREAT ROOM 200.00 Total : 200.00 6636 6/13/2016 005054 PALMER, ELIZABETH PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 REFUND: SUMMER DAY CAMP 343.00 Total : 343.00 6637 6/13/2016 005051 REVERE, BRANDI PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: FIRESIDE LOU! 500.00 Total : 500.00 6638 6/13/2016 005064 RICHARDSON, TRINA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 REFUND: SUMMER DAY CAMP 117.00 Total : 117.00 6639 6/1312016 004663 SANBORN, DOUGLAS PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: DISCOVERY PL 35.00 Page: �� vchlist 06/13/2016 10:54:12AM Voucher List Page: Spokane Valley r5 _� Bank code : pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 6639 6/13/2016 004663 004663 SANBORN, DOUGLAS (Continued) Total : 35.00 6640 6/13/2016 004363 SCHMLDTLEIN, JESSICA PARKS REFUND 001 23110.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: PLAYGROUND 75.00 Total : 75.00 6641 6/13/2016 005067 SETHER, TIFFANY PARKS REFUND 001.237 10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU ME, 384.00 Total : 384.00 6642 6/13/2016 005074 SMITH, KIMBERLINA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREENACRES 75.00 Total : 75.00 6643 6/13/2016 005061 SPRY, MICHAEL PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU ME, 300.00 Total : 300.00 6644 6/13/2016 005062 STRAtGHTEIGHT FILMS PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU SPF 75.00 Total : 75.00 6645 6/13/2016 005076 TRU GREEN PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: BROWNS PARK 75.00 Total : 75.00 6646 6/13/2016 005069 ULBRIGHT, BRIAN PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: VALLEY MISSIC 75.00 Total : 75.00 6647 6/13/2016 001452 VALLEY BIBLE CHURCH PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: VALLEY MISSIC 300.00 Total : 300.00 6648 6/13/2016 005080 VARTY, PATTY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU MB 300.00 Total : 300.00 6649 6/13/2016 005056 VERNON, LEAH PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: VALLEY MISSIC 75.00 Total : 75.00 6650 6/13/2016 004365 WALL-CARPINTEYRO, SHELENA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: VALLEY MISSIC 159.00 Total : 159.00 6651 6/13/2016 004371 WINDERMERE MARATHON LLC PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU MEQ 300.00 Total : 300.00 6652 6/13/2016 005075 WIYKOVICS, VICTORIA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: BROWNS PARE 75.00 Page: vchlist 06//312016 10:54:12AM Voucher List Page: 4 Spokane Valley Bank code : pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 6652 6/13/2016 005075 005075 WIYKOVICS, VICTORIA (Continued) Total : 75.00 39 Vouchers for bank code : pk-ref Bank total : 7,857.00 39 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 7,657.00 the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: -4-- vchlist 06/15/2016 9:08:48AM Voucher List Page: —ice Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 38608 6/15/2016 000692 GUS JOHNSON FORD 16727 501.000.000.594 2016 FORD F-250 SUPERCAB P1CK 32,496.85 Total : 32,49625 1 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 1 Vouchers in this report the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished. the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that 1 am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Bank total : 32,496.85 Total vouchers : 32,496.85 Page: "r� vchlist 0611512416 12:02:42PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept Description/Account Amount 38609 6/15/2016 002110 TARGET MEDIA NORTHWEST June 14, 2016 001.018.013.513 POSTAGE FOR HOT TOPIC SPRING 7,779.34 Total : 7,779.34 1 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 7,779.34 1 Vouchers in this report 1, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley. and that i am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Total vouchers : 7,779.34 Page: 1 vchlist 06/1612016 8:49:32AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 38610 6/16/2016 004969 CAMP AUTOMOTIVE INC 147321 501.000.000.594 2016 CHEVROLET COLORADO 2 \t 24,974.60 Total : 24,974.60 1 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 1 Vouchers in this report 1, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Bank total : 24,974.60 Total vouchers : 24,974.60 Page: �1 vchlist 06/16/2016 1:38:49PM Voucher List Spokane Valley j7e ) Page: .- Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 38611 6/16/2016 001081 ALSCO 38612 6/16/2016 000334 ARGUS JANITORIAL LLC 38613 6/16/2016 000030 AVISTA 38614 6/16/2016 000841 BCI CREATIVE INC 38615 6/16/2016 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC 38616 6/16/2016 004854 CAMTEK INC 38617 6/16/2016 003300 CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL LSPO1767723 LSPO1773140 INV013553 June 2016 May 2016 12801 9755590 9757583 S0138450 35966 May 2016 38618 6/16/2016 003317 COEUR 0' ALENE PRESS, SHOSHONE N 5090712 38619 6/16/2016 000326 CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION #19 38620 6/16/2016 000795 EARTHWORKS RECYCLING INC. 38621 6/16/2016 000246 EAST SPOKANE WATER DIST #1 May 2016 351849 May 2016 Fund/Dept 001.016.000.521 001.016.000.521 001.016.000.521 101.042.000.542 001.076.300.576 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.016.000.521 001.058.050.558 001 076.305.575 402.402.000.531 001.076.305.575 402.402.000.531 DescriptionlAccount Amount FLOOR MAT SERVICE AT PRECINC FLOOR MAT SERVICE AT PRECINC Total : JANITORIAL SVCS: MAY 2016 Total : UTILITIES: PW MASTER AVISTA UTILITIES: PARKS MASTER AVISTA Total : CENTERPLACE WEBSITE HOSTING Total : LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT C LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT C LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT C Total : SERVICE ON PRECINCT GATE Total SUPPLIES: CD Total : NORTH IDAHO BUSINESS JOURNP Total : UTILITIES: PW Total : RECYCLING COLLECTION AT CP 5, Total : 20.39 20.39 40.78 2,501.87 2,501.87 25,799.69 8,281.93 34,081.62 211.59 211.59 299.11 45.97 15.13 360.21 168.49 168.49 34.97 34.97 271.00 271.00 414.34 414.34 35.00 35.00 WATER CHARGES: PW 2,231.27 Tota! : 2,231.27 Page: ` 1 vchlist Voucher List 06/16/2016 1:38:49PM Spokane Valley Pager r2 Sank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor invoice 38622 6/16/2016 002308 FINKE, MELISSA May 2016 May 2016 38623 6/16/2016 004813 FIRST CHOICE COFFEE SERVICES 38624 6/16/2016 001983 GLOBAL EQUIP COMPANY 38625 6/16/2016 000070 INLAND POWER & UGI IT CO 38626 6/16/2016 002990 INPRO 38627 6/16/2016 000388 IRVIN WATER DIST. #6 38628 6/1612016 001944 LANCER LTD 38629 6/1612016 004926 LE CATERING CO 38630 6/16/2016 000132 MODERN ELECTRIC WATER CO 38631 6/16/2016 000997 OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY 38632 6/16/2016 001860 PLATT ELECTRICAL SUPPLY 38633 6/16/2016 004029 ROSS PRINTING COMPANY 141987 109479911 2301 2016-2017: 31 May 2016 May 2016 0459455 Contract #15 Contract #16 May 2016 SR27470001 .3529816 095604 Fund/Dept 001.076.301.571 001.076.301.571 001.076.305.575 309.000.241.594 101.042.000.542 001.076.305.575 402.402.000.531 001.076.300.576 001.076.000.576 001.076.099.575 001.076.305.575 101.042.000.542 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 Description/Account Amount INSTRUCTOR PMT INSTRUCTOR PMT Total : COFFEE SUPPLIES AT CENTERPL, Total : Total : Total : OUTDOOR PET STATION UTILITIES: MAY 2016 PW ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES FOR Total : UTILITIES: PW UTILITIES: PARKS Total : BROCHURE FOR DISCOVERY PLA' Total : CATERING INVOICE: BATEMAN-SC CATERING INVOICE: ACTION CCA( Total : UTILITIES: MAY 2016 PW REPAIRS TO ELEVATOR Total : Total : SUPPLIES FC)R CENTFRPI ACF Total : 216.00 652.50 868.50 120.06 120.06 705.08 705.08 424.24 424.24 150.00 150.00 232.35 166.00 398.35 545.67 545.67 1,000.00 38.31 1,038.31 8,471.93 8,471.93 483.24 483.24 7261.77 226.77 PRINTING FOR CENTERPLACE 260.88 Page: vchlist 0611612016 1:38:49P M Voucher List Spokane Valley Page:'' Bank code: apbank Voucher ©ate Vendor Invoice 38633 6/16/2016 004029 38634 6/16/2016 000709 38635 38636 38637 38638 38639 38640 38641 38642 6/16/2016 000323 6/16/2016 000324 6/1612016 000404 004029 ROSS PRINTING COMPANY (Continued) SENSKE LAWN & TREE CARE INC. 6647519 6662161 6662174 6662475 6690227 6703790 6857717 7027279 7251974 SPOKANE CO UTILITIES SPOKANE CO WATER DIST #3 June 2016 May 2016 SPOKANE VALLEY HERITAGE MUSEUM June 2016 June 2016 6116/2016 001969 SUNSHINE DISPOSAL 6/16/2016 001832 SWISHER Fund/Dept 001.016.000.521 001.076.300.576 402.402.000.531 001.016.000.521 001.016.000.521 001.016.000.521 001.076.305.575 402.402,000.531 001.01 6.000.521 Description/Account Amount Total : SERVICE AT PRECINCT BLDG CONTRACT MA1NT: PARKS APRIL `e 895 CONTRACT MAINTENANCE SERVICES AT PRECINCT SERVICES AT PRECINCT SERVICES AT PRECINCT QUARTERLY PEST CONTROL AT CI 2016 ROADWAY LANDSCAPING SE MON I HLY SEI -VICES Al PRECINU' Total : 001.076.302.576 SPOKANE CO SEWER CHRGS: JUI Total : 101.042.000.542 WATER CHARGES: PW 105.000.000.557 105.000.000.557 Total : 2016 LODING TAX GRANT RE!MBU1 2016 LODGING TAX REIMBURSEMI Total 1043547 001.058.056.524 TRANSFER STATION 1951805 001.076.305.575 JANITORIAL SL PPLIES: CP 6/16/2016 002306 TERRELL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, MIC 2594 6/16/2016 000167 VERA WATER & POWER June 2016 6/16/2016 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 0285102-2681-5 Total : Total : 309.000.242.594 0242 -LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Total : 101.042.000.542 UTILITIES: JUNE 2016 001.076.305.575 0285103-2681-3 001.016.000.521 Total : WASTE MANAGEMENT: CENTERPI WASTE MANAGEMENT: PRECINCT 260.88 51.09 58.934.26 530.46 51.09 84.73 52.12 353.27 6,430.89 289.09 66,777.00 1,637,69 1,637.69 421.07 421.07 1,599 66 685,00 2,284 66 498.31 498.31 685.36 685.36 253.75 253.75 3,308.46 3,308.46 740.35 283.09 Page: vchlist 06/16/2016 1:38:49PM Voucher List Page —4 Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept Description/Account Amount 38642 6/16/2016 000038 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKAN (Continued) Total : 1,023.44 38643 6/16/2016 004961 ZOME [NC ZDM-24041 001.076.:301.571 SHIRTS FOR STAFF AND CAMPER: 916.45 ZDM-24049 001.076.301.571 SHIRTS FOR RECREAT[ON STAFF 762.15 Total : 1,678.60 33 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 132,612.51 33 Vouchers in this report 1, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered. or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spukai ie !galley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim, Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Total vouchers : 132,612.51 Page: vchlist 06/16/2016 1:49:38PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page r 1 Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 38644 6/16/2016 005084 BARCLAY, PATRICK 38645 6/16/2016 004231 BELSBY ENGINEERING 38646 6/16/2016 004439 BIRCH COMMUNICATIONS INC 38647 6/16/2016 000101 CDW-G 38648 6/16/2016 001888 COMCAST 38649 6/16/2016 000508 CONOCOPHILLIPS FLEET EXPENSES 16224 21489539 LX 09814 JUNE 2016 45641946 38650 6/16/2016 000603 CONTRACT DESIGN ASSOCIATES INC 38572 38651 38652 38653 6/16/2016 002604 6/16/2016 000365 6/16/2016 003261 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC DEPT OF LICENSING FEHR & PEERS 38654 6/16/2016 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 78531591 Fund/Dept 001.058.057.558 001.058.055.558 001.076.305.575 001.090.000.518 001.090.000.518 001.018.014.514 001.018.013.513 001.090.000.548 DOL- 2016 FORD F-250 101.042.000.543 107760 108033 45765 45766 45767 45768 001.058.051.558 001.058.051.558 001.013.000.513 001.058.056.558 001.058.056.558 001.058.056.558 Description/Account Amount EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Total Total : PHONE SERVICE AT CENTERPLAC Total : II SUPPLIES INTERNET CITY HALL MAY 2016 FLEET FUEL BILL TASK CHAIRS Total : Total : Total : Total : COMPUTER LEASE 001-8922117-0( Total : VEHICLE REGISTRATION Total : MIRABEAU SUBAREA TRAFFIC STt MIRABEAU SUBAREA TRAFFIC STt Total : LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION Total : 114.47 114.47 632.50 632.50 212.10 212.10 152.10 152.10 106.15 106.15 1,671.45 1,671.45 5,402.57 5,402.57 1,006.63 1,00 6.63 47.75 47.75 7,697.94 5,983.86 13,681.80 28.90 96.05 96.90 106.25 328.10 Page: vchlist 0611612016 1:49:38PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 38655 6/16/2016 005083 GARCIA, LUIS 38656 6/16/2016 000917 GRAYBAR 38657 6/16/2016 001723 HEDEEN & CADITZ PLLC 38658 6/16/2016 004801 INLAND NW ECONOMIC ALLIANCE 38659 6/16/2016 000288 INT'L CODE COUNCIL 38660 6/16/2016 003190 LUKINS & ANNIS P.S 38661 6/16/2016 003959 MAX J KUNEY CO 38662 6/16/2016 002259 MENKE JACKSON BEYER LLP 38663 6/16/2016 000366 MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE 38664 6/16/2016 001035 NDM TECHNOLOGIES INC 38665 6/16/2016 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. EXPENSES 985410750 8170 8171 INEA 2016 SUPPORT 1000697967 353579 PAY APP 20 492 P0203456 24696 24697 24705 24711 838384412002 842236584001 842756834001 843246006001 Fund/Dept 001.058.050.558 001.090.000.518 001.013.015.515 001.013.015.515 001.058.051.558 001.058.057.558 001.013.0 Description/Account Amount EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : SUPPLIES: IT Total PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Total : INEA MEMBERSHIP INT'L CODE COUNCIL 5.515 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 303.303.155.595 001.013.015.515 313.000.000.592 001.090.000.518 001.090.000.518 001.076.099.576 001.090.000.518 001.076.000.576 001.018.014, 514 001.018.014.514 001.076.304.575 Total : Total : Total : 0155 - SULLIVAN RD WEST BRIDGE Total : PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Total : PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR B, Total : QUARTERLY SENTINEL IPS QUARTERLY SENTINEL EPS WATCHGUARD FIREBOXT10 FOR IT SUPPORT Total : OFFICE SUPPLIES:PARKS OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES:PARKS 77.07 77.07 99.46 99.46 687.50 82.50 770.00 500.00 500.00 1,703.34 1,703.34 70.00 70.00 600,512.04 600, 512.04 78.00 78.00 13.500.00 13; 500.00 1.197.00 1.197.00 1.067.56 1.050.00 4,511.56 1.40 6.84 19.76 65.64 Page: vchlist 06116/2016 1:49:38 P M Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 38665 6/1612016 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. (Continued) 843507890001 38666 6/1612016 005049 PEDERSON, MICHAEL ROY MAY 2016 38667 6/16/2016 000019 PURFECT LOGOS LLC 43735 38668 6/1612016 002193 ASCEND TECHNOLOGES INC 7554 38669 6/16/2016 002835 SCS DELIVERY INC 8551 38670 6/1612016 000230 SPOKANE CO AUDITORS OFFICE MAY 2016 38671 6/1612016 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 3304003962 38672 6116/2016 004740 THOMSON REUTERS -WEST 834112405 38673 6/1612016 000335 TIRE-RAMA 8080043431 38674 6/1612016 002597 TWISTED PAIR ENTERPRISES LLC 5312016-1 38675 6/16/2016 000087 VERIZON WIRELESS 9765627165 9765750043 38676 6/1612016 001885 ZAYO GROUP LLC JUNE 2016 JUNE 2016 Fund/Dept DescriptionlAccount Amount 001.076.305.575 OFFICE SUPPL1ES:PARKS 101.042.000.542 DEAD ANIMAL REMOVAL 001.076.000.576 001.018.013.513 001.011.000.511 001.058.056.558 Total : Total DECALS FOR FLEET VEHICLES Total : DDOS MULTI -LAYER PROTECTION Total : PACKAGE DELIVERY FOR COUNCI Total : RECORDING FEES Total : Total : Total : 001.058.055.558 OFFICE SUPPLES: CD 001.013.015.515 001.058.055.558 001.011.000.511 101.042.000.542 402.402.000.531 SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES SERVICE 2013 FORD ESCAPE 5364 Total : BROADCASTING COUNCIL MEETIN Total : MAY 2016 VERIZON CELL PHONES MAY2016 WIRELESS DATA CARD Total : 001.090.000.518 DARK FIBER LEASE 001.090.000.518 INTERNET SERVICE 97.81 191.45 750.00 750.00 136.96 136.96 600.00 600.00 100.00 100.00 628.00 628.00 49.80 49.80 781.32 781.32 37.99 37.99 1.560.00 1.560.00 1,590.15 -389.20 1.200.95 253.01 560.73 Page: vehlist 06/16/2016 1:49:36PM Voucher List Page: Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 38676 6/16/2016 001885 001885 ZAYQ GROUP LLC 33 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 33 Vouchers in this report I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obliyatiun against the City of Spukaue Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date (Continued) Total : 813.74 Bank total : 652, 027.30 Total vouchers : 652,027.30 Page: �4� vchlist 06/2012016 9:46:43AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 38677 6/20/2016 005087 PARK SPE LLC PARCEL 45016.9051 303.303.141.595 ROW - SULLIVAN EUCLID PCC PRE 5,700.00 Total : 5,700.00 1 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 5,700.00 1 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 5,700.00 1, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 28, 2016 Department Director Approval : Item: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ['new business ['public hearing ['information ❑admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Payroll for Pay Period Ending June 15, 2016 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: Budget/Financial impacts: Employees Council Total Gross: $ 280,470.52 $ $ 280,470.52 Benefits: $ 97,701.28 $ $ 97,701.28 Total payroll $ 378,171.80 $ $ 378,171.80 RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to Approve above payroll. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.] STAFF CONTACT: Raba Nimri DRAFT Attendance: Councilmembers: Rod Higgins, Mayor Arne Woodard, Deputy Mayor Ed Pace, Councilmember Sam Wood, Councilmember Bill Gothmann, Council Pro Tem MINUTES City of Spokane Valley City Council Special Meeting Tuesday, May 31, 2016 Staff: Mark Calhoun, Acting City Manager Cary Driskell, City Attorney Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Mayor Higgins called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present. EXECUTIVE SESSION: It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn into executive session for approximately sixty minutes to evaluate the qualifications of candidates for appointment to elective office [RCW 42.30110(1)(h)] and that action is anticipated thereafter during the 6:00 p.m. regular Council meeting. Council adjourned into executive session at 5:02 p.m. At 5:34 p.m., Mayor Higgins declared Council out of executive session, at which time it was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. L.R. Higgins, Mayor ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Council Minutes: 05-31-2016 Page 1 of 1 Approved by Council: DRAFT Attendance: Councilmembers MINUTES SPOKANE VALLEY COUNCIL MEETING STUDY SESSION Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers Spokane Valley, Washington May 31, 2016 Staff Rod Higgins, Mayor Arne Woodard, Deputy Mayor Ed Pace, Councilmember Sam Wood, Councilmember Bill Gothmann, Councilmember Pro Tem Mark Calhoun, Deputy City Manager Cary Driskell, City Attorney Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director Mike Stone, Parks & Rec Director Eric Guth, Public Works Director Morgan Koudelka, Sr Administrative Analyst Carolbelle Branch, Public Information Officer Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Mayor Higgins called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present. ACTION ITEMS: 1. First Reading Proposed Ordinance 16-009 Avista Electrical Franchise — Cary Driskell After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded that Council place proposed Ordinance 16-009 granting an electrical franchise to Avista Corporation on a future agenda for a second ordinance reading. Mr. Driskell made brief comments about the franchise, and that Avista is one of four electrical utility providers in the City, and that this would be similar to other franchises granted by the City, and would be for a period of twenty-five years. Mayor Higgins invited public comment. No comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. Motion Consideration: Determine Interviews for Council Vacancies — Chris Bainbridge City Clerk Bainbridge explained the process to fill Council vacancies, per the Council's Governance Manual, and she explained the method to determine interviews for the two vacant positions. Ms. Bainbridge also noted that the "public comment" on the agenda was placed there in error, as also per the Council's Governance Manual, there will be no public comments during this entire process as the appointments are strictly up to Council. Ms. Bainbridge said that as noted in the Governance Manual, a second is required in order for the nomination to proceed. The following nominations were offered: Councilmember Gothmann nominated Ben Wick; there was no second so the nomination did not proceed. Councilmember Pace nominated Jonathan Collier; seconded by Deputy Mayor Woodard. Councilmember Wood nominated Pamela Haley; seconded by Councilmember Pace. Deputy Mayor Woodard nominated Michael Munch; seconded by Councilmember Pace. Mayor Higgins nominated Michelle Rasmussen; seconded by Deputy Mayor Woodard. Councilmember Gothmann nominated Frank Hutchison; seconded by Councilmember Wood. Councilmember Pace had no further nominations. Councilmember Wood nominated David Wiyrick; seconded by Councilmember Pace. Deputy Mayor Woodard nominated Patrick Stretch; seconded by Councilmember Wood. Mayor Higgins had no further nominations. Councilmember Gothmann nominated Linda Thompson; there was no second so the nomination did not proceed. Councilmember Pace had no further nominations. Councilmember Wood nominated William Bauder; there was no second so the nomination did not proceed. Council Study Session: 05-31-2016 Page 1 of 3 Approved by Council: DRAFT There were no further nominations. It was then moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to close the nominations. Ms. Bainbridge stated that in order for the applicant to be interviewed, a minimum of three votes are required. The following are the results of the votes to interview, indicated by raised hands: In favor of Jonathan Collier: all members of Council except Councilmember Gothmann. In favor of Pamela Haley: all members of Council. In favor of Michael Munch: all members of Council except Councilmember Gothmann In favor of Michelle Rasmussen: Mayor Higgins, Deputy Mayor Woodard, Councilmember Gothmann. In favor of Frank Hutchison: all members of Council except Councilmember Pace. In favor of David Wiyrick: Mayor Higgins, and Councilmembers Pace and Wood. In favor of Patrick Stretch: only Deputy Mayor Woodard and Councilmember Wood. In favor of William Bauder: only Deputy Mayor Woodard and Councilmember Wood. To recap, Ms. Bainbridge said that the following six individuals will be interviewed for Council Positions 2 and 5: (1) Jonathan Collier; (2) Pamela Haley; (3) Frank Hutchison; (4) Michael Munch; (5) Michelle Rasmussen; and (6) David Wiyrick. City Clerk Bainbridge said that she will notify all applicants of the outcome of tonight's process. NON -ACTION ITEMS: 3. Solid Waste Collection Request for Proposals Update — Eric Guth, Erik Lamb, Morgan Koudelka Public Works Director Guth explained about the history leading up to the issuance of a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a solid waste contract, as noted on his Request for Council Action form; said this RFP is for competitive solicitation for curbside pickup, and tonight is part of the public outreach portion of developing that RFP. In review of the questions for the solid waste survey, Mr. Guth added that this survey will be on our website, can be completed on-line, and will be included in the Hot Topics newsletter which will be mailed to all residents. After Mr. Guth went over the draft survey questions, discussion ensued about recycling and sorted versus unsorted and possible cost savings; the idea of having a local call center for customers; billing frequency, clean green and frequency of pickups. Mr. Lamb added that the ideal is enhanced service with the lowest rates; and that we want to get a feel for what is most important so we can seek those lower rates but retain enhanced services. Mr. Lamb noted the survey will be distributed mid- June and they hope to get comments back by early July. Councilmember Gothmann asked about reduced rates for seniors and universal or mandatory pickup. Mr. Calhoun added that reduced rates can be accomplished by the use of a smaller can. Deputy Mayor Woodard noted that he does not want to eliminate the capability for self -hauling, and it was noted that self -hauling would not be eliminated. The idea of a smaller bin for recyclables was also mentioned. Mr. Lamb explained that we are mandated under the solid waste regulations to include recycling, so we must provide that as part of the curbside collection; but said it is possible to have an option to provide for an alternate program, but that would have to be demonstrated to the Department of Ecology that such alternate plan works as well; he said he spoke with the consultant who advised that no one has been able to achieve an alternate program on the west side. Mr. Lamb said we have two local examples: Airway Heights and Cheney; said he doesn't know how Airway Heights achieved not requiring curbside recycling, and that Cheney has their own recycling drop boxed provided free. Mr. Lamb mentioned that they are looking for proposals that will include recycling at no extra change, and flexible can size. Mr. Lamb said they have not looked at mandatory collection and Council concurred. 4. Public Safety Ad Hoc Committee — Cary Driskell Cary Driskell introduced Mr. Rick Eichstaedt, Executive Director of the Center for Justice, and said that when they last presented this topic April 19 there was discussion about some options for a citizens advisory committee or oversight committee, not just for law enforcement but other contracts as well; and said that Council ultimately determined to just focus on law enforcement. Mr. Driskell said there were some concerns expressed at the April 19 meeting about our ability concerning how much oversight and/or influence we could have over such a contract based on the interlocal agreement, as his concern was if we tried to tell the Sheriffs Office how to do their job, it could raise an argument of interfering with the independent contract relationship; and said he has some very serious concerns about breaching the contract, also concerns from a labor standpoint and workplace for deputies if we argued about how they do their job; and if a deputy got Council Study Session: 05-31-2016 Page 2 of 3 Approved by Council: DRAFT hurt, we could potentially face liability; and Mr. Driskell went over those tasks of appropriate involvement for a public safety advisory committee, as noted in his Request for Council Action. Mr. Eichstaedt mentioned, and the Clerk distributed copies to Council, of the Oversight Review of the Citizens Advisory Review Board, by Kathryn Olson of the Change Integration Consulting firm. Mr. Eichstaedt briefly mentioned some of the content of that report and urged Council to look at the recommendations; he said it is apparent that some changes are needed to address community concerns with the current CAB (Citizens Advisory Board). Mr. Driskell said he too will look through this report and mentioned that next week's Council meeting will include a thorough look at the current contract; he said we already have significant oversight on this contract thanks to the work of Morgan Koudelka and John Pietro. Deputy Mayor Woodard said the report mentioned a paid staff person, and he would assume that would constitute a change in our cost and Mr. Driskell confirmed that the Sheriffs Office would look to us to pay for whatever additional staff we would think necessary. Deputy Mayor Woodard said that after he reads the report, he might want more discussion. Councilmember Gothmann added that since this report was prepared for the Sheriff's Office, he would like to get their response to the report. Mr. Eichstaedt mentioned that he intends to send a letter to the Sheriff's Office asking him to provide a response to these changes, and/or to go forward and implement them. 5. 2016 LTGO Bond Issuance Update — Mark Calhoun After Acting City Manager Calhoun gave a brief explanation of the bonding issue and bid award for the new City Hall; he mentioned that the chart showing the payments for the lease compared with the fixed bond payment, show after thirty years, that we would own the building and save approximately $7 million. Mr. Calhoun said that the bonds are scheduled to close this Thursday. Mayor Higgins extended congratulations to Mr. Calhoun and his staff; and Mr. Calhoun also extended thanks to Finance Director Taylor, Community Development Director Hohman, and City Attorney Driskell and Deputy City Attorney Lamb for a good job from them all. 6. Domestic Violence Advocacy - Chief VanLeuven, Detective Andrew Stockman Police Chief VanLeuven introduced Detective Andrew Stockman. Detective Stockman went through the PowerPoint presentation explaining about the Lethality Assessment Program and domestic violence; how the program helps victims of domestic violence find their voice and their trust in the advocates; about the work with the YWCA and the prosecutors, and how they all collaborate in personally looking over the cases; said this program is an opportunity to prevent serious harm or even homicide. Chief VanLeuven mentioned that this is a very successful program County -wide. 7. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins There were no suggested changes to the Advance Agenda. 8. Acting City Manager Comments — Mark Calhoun Mr. Calhoun noted that as Chief VanLeuven has announced his retirement effective June 30, interviews for the Police Chief will be held next week. He also mentioned the City Hall groundbreaking will be held at the new City Hall site next Thursday at 9 a.m. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m. ATTEST: L.R. Higgins, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Council Study Session: 05-31-2016 Page 3 of 3 Approved by Council: DRAFT MINUTES City of Spokane Valley City Council Special Meeting Tuesday, June 7, 2016 Attendance: Councilmembers: Rod Higgins, Mayor Arne Woodard, Deputy Mayor Ed Pace, Councilmember Sam Wood, Councilmember Bill Gothmann, Councilmember Pro Tem Staff: Mark Calhoun, Acting City Manager Cary Driskell, City Attorney Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney John Hohman, Community Dev. Director Bill Carrie Koudelka, Deputy City Clerk Mayor Higgins called the meeting to order at 4:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: Deputy City Clerk Koudelka called the roll; all Councilmembers were present except Councilmember Wood. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to excuse Councilmember Wood until he arrives to the meeting. EXECUTIVE SESSION: It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn into executive session for approximately one hour, thirty minutes to discuss the consideration of acquisition of real property [RCW 42.30110(1)(b)], pending litigation and potential litigation [RCW 42.30110(1)(i)]; and that no action will be taken upon return to open session. Council adjourned into executive session at 4:33 p.m. At 4:34 p.m. Councilmember Wood arrived at the meeting. At 5:48 p.m., Mayor Higgins declared Council out of executive session, at which time it was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. L.R. Higgins, Mayor ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Council Minutes: 06-07-2016 Page 1 of 1 Approved by Council: DRAFT MINUTES City of Spokane Valley City Council Regular Meeting Formal Meeting Format Tuesday, June 7, 2016 Mayor Higgins called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Attendance: Rod Higgins, Mayor Arne Woodard, Deputy Mayor Ed Pace, Councilmember Sam Wood, Councilmember Bill Gothmann, Councilmember Pro Tem Staff Mark Calhoun, Deputy City Manager Cary Driskell, City Attorney Mike Stone, Parks & Recreation Director Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director John Hohman, Comm. Development Director Eric Guth, Public Works Director Rick Van Leuven, Police Chief Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney Steve Worley, Senior Engineer Morgan Koudelka, Sr Administrative Analyst Mike Basinger, Senior Planner Carolbelle Branch, Public Information Officer Carrie Koudelka, Deputy City Clerk INVOCATION: Pastor Al Hulten of Valley Assembly Church led the invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Everyone stood for the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Deputy City Clerk Koudelka called the roll; all Councilmembers were present. APPROVAL OF AGENDA It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the agenda. INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS n/a COMMITTEE, BOARD, LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS Councilmember Wood said he attended an event at the House of Charity. Councilmember Pace had nothing to report. Councilmember Gothmann said he attended the groundbreaking at Opportunity Elementary school. He said his term expires a week from today and said that due to his country and the government he has had a fortunate life; he went to college, earned degrees, built a house, has flown planes, written books, and has enjoyed many freedoms. He said after retirement he felt he wanted to give back to the community and has done so, first on the Planning Commission and then on the City Council. He thanked Council for the opportunity to serve the City the last several months. Deputy Mayor Woodard said he represented the Valley at the Sunrise Elementary school groundbreaking where he commented on the importance of passing school bonds and education. MAYOR'S REPORT Mayor Higgins said there is money in the bank to build the new City Hall and that he attended a meeting of the Clean Air Advisory Board. He also said Spokane Valley was designated a Well City by the Association of Washington Cities and is one of 112 members to receive the Well City award which allows for a two percent discount on the City's 2017 insurance premiums. PROCLAMATION: n/a Minutes Regular Council Meeting: 06-07-2016 Page 1 of 7 Approved by Council: DRAFT PUBLIC COMMENTS: After Mayor Higgins explained the process and ground rules, he invited general public comments. Jesse Granado, Spokane Valley, said he is the District Manager of Waste Management in Spokane Valley and provided information on their local services, along with a flyer detailing 2016 residential rates for curbside solid waste collection. He said their primary customer service staff are located in Phoenix, AZ, but they have recently opened a new local customer service center at 11321 E. Indiana Ave. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Draft Amended 2016 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) — Steve Worley Senior Engineer Worley said the public hearing is to discuss the amended 2016 TIP and that amending the TIP is done at least once every year. He said this is the second amendment due to changing projects and the need to add three projects to the list for this year. 1) Sullivan Euclid PCC Intersection project: the City received $1.2 million in funds from Spokane Regional Transportation Council for construction of the project. He said we can apply for state funds through a local Call for Projects grant to reduce the City's funds needed for our local match, which he will present to Council on July 12 to get input as to what grants we should apply for. 2) Barker Rd/BNSF Grade Separation project: the City has federal earmarked funds for this project and Council agreed to provide the local match for those funds. 3) Bridging the Valley project: there are funds in this year's budget to acquire property to support an undercrossing at Pines and Trent and those funds used will qualify toward our local match requirement. He said they deleted the Sprague LID project due to a delay in grant funding but he said the project may come back in a later year. Mayor Higgins opened the public hearing at 6:23 p.m. and invited public comment. There were no comments from the public. Mayor Higgins closed the public hearing at 6:24 p.m. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: Draft 2017-2022 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program — Steve Worley Senior Engineer Worley said state law requires the City prepare a six-year TIP every year to plan for transportation projects. He said he presented the TIP to Council at the May 24th meeting and this hearing is to take public comments and answer questions. Mayor Higgins opened the public hearing at 6:25 p.m. and invited public comment: Krisinda Marshall, Spokane Valley, asked if the projects on the TIP can change. Mr. Worley said the TIP is a fluid document and the projects can change. Mr. Worley said he also received a call from someone with a comment regarding the Mission project that errantly shows three lanes and he will correct that to reflect two lanes in the TIP. Mayor Higgins closed the public hearing at 6:27 p.m. 3. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. Proposed Motion: I move to approve the Consent Agenda. a. Approval of claim vouchers on June 7, 2016 Request for Council Action Form, Total: $703,255.62 b. Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending May 31, 2016: $415,138.04 c. Approval of May 17, 2016 Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session d. Approval of May 24, 2016 Council Meeting Minutes, Formal Format It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the Consent Agenda. NEW BUSINESS: 4. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 16-008 Amending 2016 Budget — Chelsie Taylor After Deputy City Clerk Koudelka read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded to approve Ordinance 16-008 amending Ordinance 15-019 which adopted a budget for the period of January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016. Finance Director Taylor said she reported on this amendment at the May 17, 2016 Council meeting and that a public hearing and first reading of the ordinance were held on May 24, 2016. She said she is prepared to discuss the details of the various amendment items previously detailed or entertain comments and questions. Mayor Higgins invited comments from the public; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None Motion carried. Minutes Regular Council Meeting: 06-07-2016 Page 2 of 7 Approved by Council: DRAFT 5. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 16-009 Avista Electrical Franchise — Cary Driskell It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded to approve proposed Ordinance 16-009 granting an electrical franchise to Avista Corporation. City Attorney Driskell said this topic has been before Council three times previously and the franchise will be for a twenty-five year term. Mayor Higgins invited comments from the public: Samantha Johnson asked as to how Avista was selected for the award. City Attorney Driskell said that information provided at previous meetings stated that Avista is one of four electrical franchises in Spokane Valley, along with Inland Power and Light, Modern and Vera, each with an assigned service area. He said this franchise agreement only applies to Avista in their service area. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None Motion carried. 6. Motion Consideration: Bid Award, Broadway Street Preservation Project — Steve Worley It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded to award the Broadway Street Preservation Project, CIP #0233, to Inland Asphalt Company as the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, in the amount of $424,424.24, and authorize the Acting City Manager to finalize and execute the construction contract. Public Works Director Guth said the project is on Broadway from Sullivan to 200 feet east of Moore Road in front of Walmart and that it ties in traffic signals to the Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) networks and upgrades ADA ramps so they are compliant with federal law. He said the City received two bids on May 20, 2016, and that the low bidder was below our engineer's estimate. He said he believes it is a responsible bid and encourages Council to award the bid to Inland Asphalt. He said the ITS consists of fiber optics that link traffic signals and message boards that allows coordination and control of devices. Mayor Higgins invited comments from the public; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None Motion carried. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mayor Higgins invited public comment. Krisinda Marshall, Spokane Valley, asked as to the purpose of SCRAPS because she said she saw a dog hit by a car and when she called SCRAPS to report it she was told to contain the dog. She said she could not contain the dog, she had her children and her own dog with her and she said she left the dog and SCRAPS did not help the dog. She said she would like someone to get back to her with information about SCRAPS and a phone number to call them. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS 7. Council/Planning Commission Comp Plan Follow-up — Mike Basinger, John Hohman Community and Economic Development Director Hohman said he and Senior Planner Basinger will give an overview of the results of the workshop held on May 3rd and update Council on where they are in the process and discuss the items they are contemplating bringing forward. Councilmember Gothmann asked if this information went out to the public. Mr. Basinger said it has gone out to the public and to the Planning Commission before the Planning Commission/Council Workshop. He said staff is drafting the framework and the land use map that will develop regulations. He went through the presentation, stating that with regard to Districts, the City Hall project received the highest support and that participants want barriers removed and no increase in regulation. Mr. Hohman said that they want to begin with a marketing effort based on the results of the workshop. Mr. Basinger said they are concerned that there was moderate support to having districts or overlays and he said they are looking at ways to support those areas. Councilmember Pace said he thought a district would be more restrictive and he said he thinks the City should be more flexible toward businesses. Councilmember Wood said he does not like the idea of districts because it restricts the types of businesses that can be in those districts. He said we could promote an area as a district as long as we do not restrict it with barriers. Mr. Basinger said Corridor concepts received the highest level of support and changing Office designations to Mixed Use received the lowest support. He asked Council to clarify their desire with regard to changing Office designations. Councilmember Pace asked if Mixed Use still allows Office and Mr. Hohman said Mixed Use zoning is the most flexible use and allows office. Councilmember Wood said he likes the idea of reducing the number of zones and giving more flexibility and opportunity which leads to more development. Deputy Mayor Woodard asked if that would help repurpose buildings along Sprague and Sullivan. Mr. Basinger said on Sprague and Appleway they are looking to allow more flexibility throughout Minutes Regular Council Meeting: 06-07-2016 Page 3 of 7 Approved by Council: DRAFT the corridor and it would not interfere with the auto dealerships. Mr. Hohman said they are looking to provide flexibility for companies such as Whites Boots so they could have onsite manufacturing and retail sales in the same facility. Mr. Basinger said staff is trying to identify areas on corridors that can be designated Neighborhood Commercial without impinging on other people's properties and overcomplicating the regulations. Councilmember Wood said he grew up in Perry district and he said he thinks that is a good example of what Neighborhood Commercial can do for revitalizing a neighborhood when it is in the right areas. Deputy Mayor Woodard said he is concerned that if we do Neighborhood Commercial in a residential neighborhood that it does not get rid of the original use. Councilmember Gothmann said Neighborhood Commercial would be Neighborhood Commercial/Residential to allow both uses. Mr. Basinger said he will talk to the consultants now that he has a better direction from Council. Mr. Basinger said Ponderosa and Rotchford Acres are designated Rl and are one -acre lots. He said they are proposing to keep both R1 and R2 designations. He said the R3 designation is 7,500 square foot minimum lot size and R4 is 6,000 square feet. He said the Comprehensive Plan stipulates that properties cannot exceed six units per acre and they are looking to consolidate R3 and R4 with a minimum lot size of 4,000 square feet to allow more flexibility for property owners to utilize their land for development. Councilmember Wood said he noticed that lot sizes and houses are getting smaller so people do not need as much lot size and he does not see a problem with going to smaller lot sizes. Deputy Mayor Woodard asked if this is in residential areas and not PUD's and Mr. Basinger confirmed it does not apply to PUD's. Deputy Mayor Woodard said he thinks it makes sense to utilize some areas of a development with smaller lot sizes but he said there should be places to absorb kids and activity, such as pocket parks. Mr. Basinger said there was high support for character and quality of life, a mix of land uses, efficient regulations and review process and a variety of housing types. He said there was little support for incentives for energy performance and renewable energy and water -saving techniques with new development. Councilmember Pace said he thinks owners should be able to use products based on cost and personal choices and not be restricted by regulations. Deputy Mayor Woodard said it should be up to the property owner to use water saving techniques or zero -landscaping efforts if it is important to them but the City should stay out of it. Mr. Basinger said the Economic Development element received the highest support, transportation received moderate support, and the housing element received the lowest support. He also said Parks and Recreation received moderate support and the Capital Facilities and the Utilities element received high support. Mr. Hohman said they are giving this same presentation to the Planning Commission on June 23rd and hope to have the same type of discussion. Acting City Manager Calhoun asked Mr. Hohman to give an update on the Comp. Plan process and status. Mr. Hohman said they are drafting the land use map and looking to bring it forward to Council in July, depending on the schedule of the meetings. He said staff has met with a number of industry people for feedback on ideas and they are consolidating that information and talking to the consultants on Thursday for refinement; staff will come back to Council with goals, policies and further detail on those items. He said the traffic consultant is working on conditions for traffic to get a baseline started and when the land use map is further along they will have an alternative to model. He said staff will be active with reports to Council over the next couple months and plan to have a draft to Council by the end of summer, probably late August. He said before that stage, staff will need Council feedback on the land use map. Mr. Hohman said staff is working to have the draft Comp. Plan finished by August 31st, and the consultant contract expires on December 31st, but he said it will take time to go through the Planning Commission and Council after August. He said the Development Regulations should be ready a month after the draft Comp Plan. Mayor Higgins call for a break at 7:37 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 7:51 p.m. 8. Marijuana Regulations — Erik Lamb Deputy City Attorney Lamb said the City established a moratorium on marijuana uses in December 2014 and extended the moratorium in late 2015 and that marijuana is regulated by federal and state law and by our local code. He said in 2015, the state tried to reconcile medical and recreational markets and laws, and he said while the state has still not finalized their rules, we have an idea where they are headed. In 2015 legislation allowed medical endorsements for retail stores to sell compliant marijuana. He said "compliant" Minutes Regular Council Meeting: 06-07-2016 Page 4 of 7 Approved by Council: DRAFT marijuana is the term the state uses rather than "medical" marijuana; it has a high CBD (cannabidiol) ratio, no pesticides and high THC (tetrahyrocannabinol) ratio. Anyone over twenty-one can purchase compliant marijuana and he said if the moratorium is lifted, retail stores in Spokane Valley will likely double from three to six. He said staff is seeking a consensus from Council to bring forward to a future agenda for an ordinance first reading for marijuana regulations. Councilmember Wood asked if we have looked at how this impacts the updates to our zoning. Mr. Lamb said not specifically but staff will look at that closely when it comes through, he said we will need to think about where the zones will be and how many there are to see how to respond through the marijuana regulations. Deputy Mayor Woodard said by allowing patients to grow up to fifteen plants per housing unit we are basically giving up on the black market. Mr. Lamb said that the state has not completely closed the loopholes. Deputy Mayor Woodard asked if Butane is a solvent and if hemp is considered a marijuana product. Mr. Lamb confirmed that Butane is a solvent but said hemp is different from marijuana and it is not supposed to contain any THC. Mayor Higgins asked if it is possible to tour a grow operation. Mr. Lamb said he will work with Mr. Hohman to set up a tour of a retail and a production facility before the first reading of the ordinance. 9. Law Enforcement Contract Review — Morgan Koudelka, Mark Calhoun Acting City Manager Calhoun provided a brief background on the topic and explained that the City contracts for many services including public safety services such as law enforcement, jail and public defender. He said we contract with Spokane County for law enforcement services and the contract is a four- year term that auto -renews unless one of the parties gives notice of termination. Sr. Administrative Analyst Koudelka went through the presentation and asked for dialogue with Council to help refine the contract and define the goals of Council that best serve the community. With regard to the length of the term of the contract, Deputy Mayor Woodard said he has been thinking about a four-year contract with a one-year "No Call" and an eighteen -month sliding notification for termination. Mr. Calhoun said he would like to hear if there is consensus any one idea or if someone has another idea. Councilmember Pace said he likes Mr. Woodard's suggestion but without the one year "No Call." Councilmember Wood said he thinks a four- year contract is needed; he said shorter contracts are not as effective, and added that he does not like auto - renewals. Mr. Woodard asked if the termination notification window can slide and Mr. Pace said he, too, would like a sliding window for termination notification and no auto -renewals. He said he would like the contract to come before Council with a performance evaluation for a Council vote before it is renewed. Councilmember Gothmann said he is agreeable to the contract coming before Council every four years for a vote or also agreeable with the contract auto -renewing. With regard to the sliding notification, he said it would be very difficult to make an investment at the beginning of a term to amortize costs if that is done over an eighteen -month period rather than four years. City Attorney Driskell said that if we are looking at no mandatory roll-over we should also look to include a provision for "mandatory meet and confer" at a specific time before the contract is set to expire so there is a deliberative process before the contract expires. He said the eighteen -month termination provision protects the City in the event we need to transition to our own police force, it provides the time necessary to do so correctly. He asked for clarification on what Councilmembers mean by "sliding eighteen months" and "No Call." Deputy Mayor Woodard said by "No Call," he means that for one year from the start of the contract, neither agency can terminate the contract and he said the "sliding notification" is after the one year No Call period has lapsed, notification of termination can be given at any time during the remainder of the four-year contract. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to extend the meeting to 10: 00 p.m. City Attorney Driskell said that the length of the contract and the length of the termination notification seem to be central tenets of the contract for Councilmembers. He asked if, within the scope of negotiating the contract with Spokane County, staff should try to come up with different options for those periods or lengths of time for the Council to consider. Mr. Pace added that no auto -renewal is also a central tenet. Mr. Driskell said that knowing those parameters gives us more flexibility to negotiate a contract that works for both the City and Spokane County. There was Council consensus. Minutes Regular Council Meeting: 06-07-2016 Page 5 of 7 Approved by Council: DRAFT With regard to community identity, Deputy Mayor Woodard said we should let the police department represent the uniqueness of Spokane Valley by their identification. Councilmember Gothmann said since incorporation Spokane Valley has made the decision for our officers to have a separate identity, but as an alternative, he said we have the choice of saving money by not having the separate identity from the Sheriff and if the public wants a separate identity, we should spend the money to do it. In addition, he said if a car fails, another car is put into service and if we do not have a separate identity, we are able to draw from larger pool of vehicles. Councilmember Pace said he thinks it makes sense to look at the whole spectrum from not having our own identity to not having a contract. He said Liberty Lake manages with a small fleet. He also said in our Comp. Plan discussion citizens brought up the importance of a City identity and he said our police force is a part of that identity. Councilmember Wood said "perception is reality" and some people do not care who keeps them safe as long as they are safe. He said we just hired a marketing firm to give us an identity and police are a big presence in the valley and while the "identity" would not make us safer, it would go toward giving us an identity. Mr. Koudelka said identifiers are already in our contract and the County is willing to negotiate those terms. He asked Council if they want to pay to have the patrol cars painted to keep consistent with the discontinued colors, and pay for different uniforms for our officers. Deputy Mayor Woodard said he supports the effort to get cars at a reduced cost and asked if officers have an annual uniform allowance to help pay for the cost of uniforms. Councilmember Pace said our police officers are outstanding, friendly and professional and he is leaning toward having our own identity to enhance the City. He said he thinks we should paint the cars ice blue and have our own municipal uniforms, but he said he would like us to look at the total cost to having our own identity in the contract and the cost to having no City identity. Councilmember Gothmann proposed staff come back to Council with options and look at getting cost estimates lower than $6,500 to paint the patrol cars ice blue. There was Council consensus. With regard to the current "Settle and Adjust" cost methodology, Deputy Mayor Woodard said he does not know how else to figure our cost and payment structure and is happy with what we are currently doing. There were no other comments from Council regarding cost methodology. With regard to overtime, Deputy Mayor Woodard said he would like staff to look into the overtime charges because the Sheriff has brought up to him several times that overtime is an issue. He said there is a risk that if we start to look at paying the true cost of our overtime usage, we may end up paying more than we are currently but he said at least it will be a true cost. There was Council consensus to look into establishing true cost overtime methodology. It was the consensus of Council to look at possible out clauses in the contract and to add a defined deficiency timeline. Mr. Koudelka said that currently we do not contract for a Citizen Advisory Board (CAB). Deputy Mayor Woodard said he would not want to get in the way of the police officers doing their job by having a CAB, and he would want to ensure protection of the innocent and the officers from potential personal damage stemming from complaints and investigations. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded to extend the meeting to 10:30 p.m. Vote by Acclamation: In favor: Mayor Higgins, Deputy Mayor Woodard, Councilmembers Pace and Gothmann. Opposed: Councilmember Wood. Motion carried. Councilmember Wood said he would like a quarterly oral summary report within thirty days of the end of each quarter provided to Council. Acting City Manager Calhoun said we can set that up as part of a study session each quarter. Mr. Wood suggested that SCOPE volunteers contact property crimes victims for support. Mr. Koudelka said staff will look into that to see if follow-up calls can come from volunteers. Deputy Mayor Woodard said he thinks that also helps in establishing our own identity. It was the consensus of Council to look into negotiating for a dedicated staff to the Police Chief and a cost methodology that segregates our true cost that is based on our current year budget and utilizes rolling averages. Deputy Mayor Woodard said he would like clarification on Section 6.8 Capital Purchases of the contract. Mr. Koudelka said that purchases the County makes between the threshold of $5,000 (currently, $2,000 is referenced in the original contract) and $10,000, the City will immediately be charged for and pay; over $50,000 and with City approval of the purchase, the City will pay as the cost is incurred. He said that for Minutes Regular Council Meeting: 06-07-2016 Page 6 of 7 Approved by Council: DRAFT purchases made falling between those two thresholds, the County will pay for and amortize the cost to the City over the useful life. He said the County did not want to float the money themselves, essentially a loan for large equipment, because it hurts their cash flow. However, if they are looking to make a purchase we do not agree with, such as purchasing a training facility, we can say that is unacceptable and cancel the contract. He said the County could still charge us for the purchase over the useful life but after the eighteen months of cancellation notification fulfillment, we are out of the contract and we would no longer be on the hook for the money. He said essentially the County is willing to front a purchase up to $50,000 and amortize it, but beyond that they would like the City to pay for its share up front so as not to hurt them with their cash flow. Councilmember Pace said he would like the contract to reflect that the Police Chief is the spokesperson and face of Spokane Valley law enforcement rather than the Sheriff. There was Council consensus. 10. Advance Agenda - Mayor Higgins Councilmember Pace said it was suggested at one time that we change the oath of office and he would like the item added to the Advance Agenda for discussion. Councilmember Wood agreed. The (11) Seth Woodard Sidewalk Project, (12) State Route 27 and Mirabeau Park Intersection, and the (13)McDonald Road Project were for information only and were not reported or discussed. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS Acting City Manager Calhoun said the ground breaking of City Hall is scheduled for 9:00 a.m. this Thursday at Sprague and Dartmouth; next week the Council meeting is a budget workshop from 8:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. and there is no evening meeting. He said in two weeks Council will interview six candidates for the two Council vacancies reminding Council that the next formal meeting will be June 28th. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 10:29 p.m. ATTEST: L.R. Higgins, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Minutes Regular Council Meeting: 06-07-2016 Page 7 of 7 Approved by Council: Meeting Date: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action June 28, 2016 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First Reading Proposed Ordinance No. 16-010 adopting marijuana - related amendments GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A.106; RCW 69.50 (codifying Initiative 502); RCW 69.51A; SVMC 17.80.150 and 19.30.040; SVMC 19.85; SVMC 19.120.050 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: City Council adopted a moratorium on unlicensed marijuana uses on December 9, 2014, and further extended it on December 1, 2015. City Council adopted a moratorium on licensed marijuana uses on October 6, 2015. City Council adopted regulations regarding zoning and buffering restrictions on licensed recreational marijuana on July 22, 2014. City staff provided numerous updates in 2015 on the 2015 State Legislative amendments to marijuana laws. City Council heard an administrative report on June 7, 2016. BACKGROUND: The City is in the process of developing comprehensive local marijuana regulations, as required pursuant to moratoriums on unlicensed and licensed marijuana adopted pursuant to Ordinance Nos. 14-021, 15-017 and 15-023. The moratoriums were adopted to allow the City to contemplate and respond to extensive State Legislative amendments in 2015 that reconciled recreational and medical marijuana laws. Those 2015 State Legislative changes and the rules being proposed and considered by the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board (WSLCB) and Washington Department of Health (DOH) are described in detail in the staff report, which is attached to this RCA. However, generally, the 2015 Legislative changes eliminate the unlicensed medical marijuana shops and create a single system of licensed marijuana production, processing, and retail stores. Retail stores may apply for and obtain a "medical marijuana endorsement" that allows them to sell "compliant marijuana" to qualified patients and designated providers in greater amounts than recreational marijuana and with an exemption from State and local sales taxes and the marijuana excise tax. The term "compliant marijuana" was developed by the DOH for those types of marijuana that may help alleviate medical symptoms in patients. However, since there has not been sufficient medical research on the medical benefits of marijuana at this time, the DOH has determined it could not call such marijuana "medical marijuana." Notably, anyone may purchase most types of compliant marijuana, but non -patients do not receive the tax exemption like qualified patients. Further, as part of the 2015 Legislation, the State increased the number of marijuana retail stores to be able to meet the demands of the medical marijuana market. Preliminarily, the WSLCB provided no increase in the number of stores within the City due to our ongoing moratorium. However, if the City were to allow additional marijuana retail stores, the number would likely increase from the three existing stores to six total retail stores. All currently unlicensed medical marijuana stores must close or obtain a license from the WSLCB by July 1, 2016. The City currently has three licensed retail stores, 21 licensed producers, and 25 licensed processors. The Planning Commission has been working since October 2015 to develop a proposal in response to the 2015 Legislative changes. The Planning Commission conducted an extensive number of meetings to take extensive public and expert input before developing and considering the proposed marijuana regulation amendments. Initially, On October 22, 2015, the Planning Commission conducted a background study session on the 2015 State Legislative amendments. As part of the session, staff provided an update on the 2015 Legislative changes, background on the City's prior marijuana regulations, and the options available for the Planning Commission to develop marijuana regulation amendments. Those options ranged from leaving the existing regulations as they were (zoning and buffering for licensed marijuana retail, marijuana production, and marijuana processing), to adopting additional buffers between marijuana stores, to adopting a full ban on all new marijuana uses. On November 12, 2015, the Planning Commission took public comment to assist with the development of marijuana amendments. The Planning Commission requested input from the Police, Fire Department, and School Districts, and on December 10, 2015, the Planning Commission received testimony from the Spokane Valley Police and Spokane Valley Fire on the impacts that each respective department had seen with the legalization of marijuana. Further, Central Valley School District provided a written statement regarding impacts it had seen within the school system. As part of that December 10, 2015, meeting, the Planning Commission deliberated and developed a proposal that banned all new marijuana uses. Specifically, the proposal banned new licensed marijuana retail, including any new retail stores seeking a medical marijuana endorsement, new licensed production, and new licensed processing. Further, the proposal banned marijuana cooperatives, which are small four-patient groupings that may grow marijuana in a domicile for medical purposes, and marijuana clubs. Finally, the proposal would have imposed strict indoor-growing standards on any home-growing by qualified patients, which was authorized by the 2015 State Legislative amendments. Staff took direction from the Planning Commission and drafted appropriate amendment language implementing the Planning Commission's proposal. The Planning Commission considered the proposed amendments at study sessions on February 25, 2016, and March 10, 2016. Further, on March 3, 2016, the Planning Commission visited two marijuana production/processing facilities (one as a drive-by, and one as a guided tour) and toured a licensed retail shop. On April 14, 2016, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on its proposed amendments and one interested party spoke. After the public hearing, the Planning Commission deliberated and ultimately decided to consider a modified proposal. Pursuant to SVMC 17.080.150, the Planning Commission conducted a second public hearing on the modified proposal on May 12, 2016. At that meeting, the Planning Commission voted 5- 2 to approve the modified proposal that is now before City Council for its consideration. The amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission and set forth in the proposed ordinance will amend chapter 19.85 SVMC, SVMC 19.120.050, and Appendix A by (1) adding definitions for medical marijuana endorsed retail stores, marijuana cooperatives, and marijuana clubs, (2) prohibiting any new licensed marijuana retail stores from all zones, (3) allowing existing licensed marijuana retail stores to locate within the existing designated zones in compliance with existing buffering requirements, (4) prohibiting marijuana cooperatives from all zones, (5) prohibiting marijuana clubs or lounges from all zones, (6) requiring any home-growing by qualified patients as allowed by state law to be conducted only in single family residential zones in permanent structures that are opaque and not visible by neighbors or from the public rights-of-way, and to clarify that renters may be required, as may be authorized by federal, state, and local laws, to give notice to landlords of their intention to grow marijuana plants in a rental dwelling. Note that the Planning Commission considered an extensive amount of information and had extensive detailed discussions regarding the 2015 Legislative amendments and development of the proposed amendments. Accordingly, copies of all RPCAs and minutes from all Planning Commission meetings on this subject are included as attachments to provide City Council with the full background on this item. At the June 7, 2016 administrative report, City Council requested to take a tour of a marijuana production/processing facility and a marijuana retail store. Staff is currently working on setting up such visits, which will occur after the first reading but prior to the second reading of the proposed ordinance. OPTIONS: Move to advance to a second reading, with or without further amendments. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to advance Ordinance No. 16-010, adopting amendments to Appendix A, chapter 19.85 SVMC, and SVMC 19.120.050 relating to marijuana regulations, to a second reading. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A. STAFF CONTACT: Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney; Christina Janssen, Planner; Jenny Nickerson, Senior Plans Examiner ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Ordinance No. 16-010; and A. Updated Staff Report for May 12, 2016 modified proposal B. Copies of Ordinance Nos. 14-021, 15-017, and 15-023 (adopting moratoriums on unlicensed and licensed marijuana uses) C. Proposed Amendments to chapter 19.85 SVMC, SVMC 19.120.050, and Appendix A D. Copy of RPCA from October 22, 2015 Planning Commission meeting E. Copy of minutes from October 22, 2015 Planning Commission meeting F. Copy of RPCA from November 12, 2015 Planning Commission meeting G. Copy of minutes from November 12, 2015 Planning Commission meeting H. Copy of RPCA from December 10, 2015 Planning Commission meeting I. Copy of minutes from December 10, 2015 Planning Commission meeting J. Copy of RPCA from February 25, 2016 Planning Commission meeting K. Copy of minutes from February 25, 2016 Planning Commission meeting L. Copy of minutes from March 3, 2016 Planning Commission tour M. Copy of RPCA from March 10, 2016 Planning Commission meeting N. Copy of minutes from March 10, 2016 Planning Commission meeting O. Copy of RPCA from April 14, 2016 Planning Commission meeting P. Copy of minutes from April 14, 2016 Planning Commission meeting Q. Copy of RPCA from May 12, 2016 Planning Commission meeting R. Copy of minutes from May 12, 2016 Planning Commission meeting S. Copy of Findings of Fact adopted by Planning Commission at May 26, 2016 meeting T. Copy of minutes of May 26, 2016 Planning Commission meeting U. Police crime tracking information requested at December 10, 2015 meeting DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 16-010 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE APPENDIX A, SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 19.120.050, AND CHAPTER 19.85 OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE TO UPDATE DEFINITIONS, PROHIBIT NEW LICENSED MARIJUANA RETAIL STORES, COOPERATIVES, AND MARIJUANA CLUBS OR LOUNGES, AUTHORIZE EXISTING LICENSED MARIJUANA RETAIL STORES TO LOCATE PURSUANT TO EXISTING CITY ZONING AND BUFFER ZONE REQUIREMENTS, AND TO ESTABLISH REQUIREMENTS FOR HOME PRODUCTION AND PROCESSING OF MARIJUANA AS ALLOWED BY LAW WITHIN RESIDENTIAL ZONES, AND TERMINATING AND REPEALING THE MORATORIUMS ESTABLISHED PURSUANT TO ORDINANCES 14- 021, 15-017, AND 15-023, AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, since 1970, federal law has prohibited the manufacture and possession of marijuana as a Schedule I drug, based on the federal government's categorization of marijuana as having a "high potential for abuse, lack of any accepted medical use, and absence of any accepted safety for use in medically supervised treatment." Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 14 (2005), Controlled Substance Act (CSA), 84 Stat. 1242, 21 U.S.C. 801 et seq; and WHEREAS, Initiative Measure No. 692, approved by the voters of Washington State on November 3, 1998, and now codified as chapter 69.51A RCW, created an affirmative defense for "qualifying patients" to the charge of possession of marijuana; and WHEREAS, in 2011, the Washington State Legislature considered and passed ESSSB 5073 that, among other things, (1) authorized the licensing of medical cannabis dispensaries, production facilities, and processing facilities; (2) permitted qualifying patients to receive certain amounts of marijuana for medicinal purposes from designated providers; (3) permitted collective gardens by qualifying patients whereby they may, consistent with state law, collectively grow marijuana for their own use; and (4) clarified that cities were authorized to continue to use their zoning authority to regulate the production, processing, or dispensing of marijuana under ESSSB 5073 and chapter 69.51A RCW within their respective jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, on April 29, 2011, former governor Christine Gregoire vetoed the portions of ESSSB 5073 that would have provided the legal basis for legalizing and licensing medical cannabis dispensaries, processing facilities, and production facilities, thereby making these activities illegal; and WHEREAS, on November 6, 2012, voters of the State of Washington approved Initiative Measure No. 502 (I-502), now codified in various chapters of the RCW, including chapters 69.50, 46.04, 46.20, 46.21, and 46.61 RCW, which provisions, (1) decriminalized possession and use of certain amounts of marijuana and marijuana paraphernalia; (2) amended state laws pertaining to driving under the influence of intoxicants to include driving under the influence of marijuana; and (3) established a regulatory system licensing producers, processors, and retailers of recreational marijuana for adults 21 years of age and older, and required the Washington State Liquor Control Board (now the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board and referred to herein as the "WSLCB") to adopt procedures and criteria by December 1, 2013 for issuing licenses to produce, process, and sell marijuana; and WHEREAS, on August 29, 2013, the United States Department of Justice issued a memo providing updated guidance on marijuana enforcement in response to the adoption of I-502. Several ongoing federal Ordinance 16-010 Page 1 of 10 DRAFT enforcement priorities were outlined, including prevention of crime and preventing distribution of marijuana to minors. Further, the memo provided that the Department would not seek ongoing prosecution of marijuana providers, users, and local officials in states that authorized marijuana, provided that those state and local governments "implement strong and effective regulatory and enforcement systems that will address the threat those state laws could pose to public safety, public health, and other law enforcement interests. A system adequate to that task must not only contain robust controls and procedures on paper; it must also be effective in practice;" and WHEREAS, on July 22, 2014, the City adopted Ordinance No. 14-008, which established in chapter 19.85 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code ("SVMC") and SVMC 19.120.050 regulations, zoning, buffers, and other limitations on marijuana producers, processors, and retail sellers licensed under chapter 69.50 RCW, but which did not regulate unlicensed marijuana uses under chapter 69.51A RCW; and WHEREAS, on December 9, 2014, the City adopted Ordinance No. 14-021, adopting a moratorium on the establishment of new unlicensed marijuana uses in order to allow the City to consider any marijuana - related legislation adopted as part of the 2015 Washington State Legislative Session and to develop comprehensive marijuana regulations incorporating such changes, and such moratorium was extended on December 1, 2015 pursuant to Ordinance No. 15-023; and WHEREAS, in 2015, the Washington State Legislature adopted the "Cannabis Patient Protection Act," Laws of 2015, ch. 70, and additional comprehensive marijuana -related regulations pursuant to Laws of 2015, ch. 4 and other enacted legislation (collectively, the "2015 Marijuana Legislation"); and WHEREAS, as part of the 2015 Marijuana Legislation, the State (1) reconciled the medical and recreational marijuana markets by establishing a "medical marijuana endorsement" that retail licensees will be able to obtain to sell medical marijuana to qualified patients and designated providers, while also making unlicensed collective gardens illegal by July 1, 2016, (2) expanded the amount of marijuana production that may be conducted state-wide to accommodate the needs of marijuana retailers with medical marijuana endorsements, (3) expanded the number of licensed marijuana retail licenses to "accommodate the medical needs of qualifying patients and designated providers," (4) authorized qualified patients and designated providers to grow up to 15 marijuana plants per residential unit, (5) created "cooperatives" which must be registered by the WSLCB, and (6) created a new license for common carriers to deliver and transport marijuana between licensed marijuana producers, processors, and retailers delivery/transportation and created a new marijuana research license for permittees to produce, process, and possess marijuana for certain limited research purposes; and WHEREAS, on September 23, 2015, the WSLCB issued, effective immediately, its Emergency Rules #15-18 (the "WSLCB Emergency Rules") to amend chapter 314-55 WAC to provide for (1) the WSLCB to begin accepting marijuana retail license applications on October 12, 2015, with the limit on the number of marijuana retail licenses to be set at a later date, (2) the WSLCB to begin accepting applications for medical marijuana endorsements, and (3) the state cap on maximum marijuana production space to be increased to an amount to be set at a later date; and WHEREAS, on October 6, 2015, the City adopted Ordinance No. 15-017, adopting and establishing a moratorium on all new licensed marijuana uses in order to allow the City to develop appropriate marijuana regulations in response to the 2015 Washington State Legislative Session and the WSLCB Emergency Rules; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted meetings on October 22, 2015, November 12, 2015, December 10, 2015, February 25, 2016, and March 10, 2016 to receive public testimony, conduct study sessions, and receive testimony from representatives from Spokane Valley Fire and Spokane Valley Police, Ordinance 16-010 Page 2 of 10 DRAFT and develop proposed amendments regarding marijuana regulations. Further, on March 3, 2016, the Planning Commission visited a licensed marijuana production and processing facility and a licensed marijuana retail store; and WHEREAS, on September 17, 2015, the Washington State Department of Commerce was notified pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, providing a 60 -day notice of intent to adopt amendments to Spokane Valley development regulations; and WHEREAS, on March 25, 2016, and April 1, 2016, notice of the Planning Commission public hearing was published in the Valley News Herald; and WHEREAS, on April 14, 2016, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, received evidence, information, public testimony, and a staff report followed by deliberations and provided an informal recommendation to consider a modified proposal; and WHEREAS, on April 22, 2016, and April 29, 2016, notice of the Planning Commission public hearing on the modified proposal was published in the Valley News Herald; and WHEREAS, on May 12, 2016, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the modified proposal, received evidence, information, public testimony, and a staff report followed by deliberations and provided a recommendation; and WHEREAS, on June 7, 2016 the City Council reviewed the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, on June 28, 2016, the City Council considered a first ordinance reading to adopt the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, on July 12, 2016, City Council considered a second ordinance reading to adopt the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, the amendments set forth below are consistent with the goals and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the amendments below bear a substantial relation to the public health, safety, and welfare and protection of the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley ordains as follows: Section 1. Findings and Conclusions. The City Council acknowledges that the Planning Commission conducted appropriate investigation and study, held a public hearing on the proposed amendments and recommends approval of the amendments. The City Council has read and considered the Planning Commission's findings. The City Council hereby makes and adopts the following findings and conclusions: A. Growth Management Act Policies — The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) provides that each city shall adopt a comprehensive land use plan and development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan. B. Compliance with Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 17.80.150(F): Ordinance 16-010 Page 3 of 10 DRAFT 1. The proposed amendments are consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan: LUP-1.1: Maintain and protect the character of existing and future residential neighborhoods through the development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations and joint planning LUP-1.2: Protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent non-residential uses and/or higher intensity uses through the development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations and joint planning Land Use Goal LUP-10.2: Encourage a diverse array of industries to locate in Spokane Valley. Economic Goal EDG-7: Maintain a regulatory environment that offers flexibility, consistency, predictability and clear direction. Economic Policy EDP -7.1: Evaluate, monitor and improve development standards to promote compatibility between adjacent land uses; and update permitting processes to ensure that they are equitable, cost-effective, and expeditious. Economic Policy EDP -7.2: Review development regulations periodically to ensure clarity, consistency and predictability. Neighborhood Policy NP -2.1: Maintain and protect the character of existing and future residential neighborhoods through the development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations and joint planning 2. The proposed amendments bear a substantial relation to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment: The proposed amendments will allow compliance with state law and allow existing state -licensed recreational and medical marijuana businesses to continue to operate within Spokane Valley while separating such uses from identified sensitive uses and the City's existing and future residential uses. Further the amendment will limit additional adverse impacts from new marijuana uses on other existing commercial uses. Finally, the proposed amendment will protect the residential character of residential neighborhoods. Section 2. Amendment. Appendix A of the SVMC is hereby amended with the following additions and amendments, to be added alphabetically: APPENDIX A DEFINITIONS A. General Provisions. 1. For the purpose of this eCode, certain words and terms are herein defined. The word "shall" is always mandatory. The word "may" is permissive, subject to the judgment of the person administering the eCode. 2. Words not defined herein shall be construed as defined in Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary. Ordinance 16-010 Page 4 of 10 DRAFT 3. The present tense includes the future, and the future the present. 4. The singular number includes the plural and the plural the singular. 5. Use of male designations shall also include female. B. Definitions. Manufacturing, petroleum and coal products: The manufacture of asphalt paving, roofing and coating and petroleum refining See "Industrial, heavy use category." Marijuana club or lounge: A club, association, or other business, for profit or otherwise, that conducts or maintains a premises for the primary or incidental purpose of providing a location where members or other persons may keep or consume marijuana on the premises, whether licensed by the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board or not, or such other similar use pursuant to RCW 69.50.465, as now adopted or hereafter amended. Marijuana cooperative: A marijuana cooperative formed pursuant to chapter 69.51A RCW, as now adopted or hereafter amended. A marijuana cooperative is comprised of up to four qualifying patients or designated providers and formed for the purposes of sharing responsibility for acquiring and supplying the resources, and producing and processing marijuana for the medical use of the members of the marijuana cooperative. Marijuana processing: Processing marijuana into usable marijuana, marijuana -infused products, and marijuana concentrates, packaging and labeling usable marijuana, marijuana -infused products, and marijuana concentrates for sale in retail outlets, and sale of usable marijuana, marijuana -infused products, and marijuana concentrates at wholesale by_ a marijuana processor licensed by the Washington State Liquor Control and Cannabis Board and pursuant to Gchapter 69.50 RCW, as now adopted or hereafter amended. See "Industrial, light use category." Marijuana production: Production and sale of marijuana at wholesale by a marijuana producer licensed by the Washington State Liquor Controland Cannabis Board and pursuant to €chapter 69.50 RCW, as now adopted or hereafter amended. See "Agricultural and animals, use category." Marijuana sales: _Selling usable marijuana, marijuana -infused products, and marijuana concentrates in a retail outlet by a marijuana retailer licensed by the Washington State Liquor Controland Cannabis Board, along with any applicable other use allowed as part of the marijuana sales pursuant to an endorsement associated with marijuana retail, including but not limited to marijuana sales with a medical endorsement, operation of a marijuana club or lounge pursuant to an endorsement, or delivery of marijuana that may require an endorsement, all as provided and pursuant to €chapter 69.50 RCW, as now adopted or hereafter amended. See "Retail sales, use category." Marijuana sales with a medical endorsement: Marijuana sales and medical marijuana sales by a marijuana retailer licensed by the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board that has been issued a medical marijuana endorsement pursuant to chapter 69.50 RCW and chapter 69.51A RCW, as now adopted or hereafter amended. Market, outdoor: A temporary or seasonal location where produce and agricultural products including, but not limited to, pumpkins, Christmas trees and firewood, as well as crafts and other items, are offered for sale to the public. See "Retail sales, use category." *** Ordinance 16-010 Page 5 of 10 DRAFT Section 3. Amendment. SVMC 19.120.050 is hereby amended with the following additions: 19.120.050 Permitted use matrix. Permitted Use Matrix Use Category/Type Residential Zone Districts Commercial and Industrial Zone Districts Supplemental Conditions R- 1 R- 2 R- 3 R- 4 MF- 1 MF- 2 MUC CMU GO 0 NC C RCP/OS I- 1 I- 2 Agriculture and Animal Kennel S S S S S P P See zoning districts for conditions Marijuana production S S S S Chapter 19.85 SVMC Orchard, tree farming, commercial P P Food and Beverage Service Espresso establishment P P PPPPP A PP Marijuana club or lounge Chapter 19.85 SVMC Mobile food vendors S S S S SS S S S S SVMC 19.60.010(L),19.70.010(B)(2) Industrial, Light Manufacturing, light P P P Marijuana processing S S S S Chapter 19.85 SVMC Ordinance 16-010 Page 6 of 10 DRAFT Permitted Use Matrix Use Category/Type Residential Zone Districts Commercial and Industrial Zone Districts Supplemental Conditions R- 1 R- 2 R- 3 R- 4 MF- 1 MF- 2 MUC CMU GO 0 NC C RCP/OS I- 1 I- 2 Plastic injection molding, thermoplastic P P P P P P Residential Dwelling, townhouse PPP P P P P Manufactured home park SSS S S SVMC 19.40.130 Marijuana cooperative Chapter 19.85 SVMC Retail Sales Manufactured home sales P P P Marijuana sales S S S S Chapter 19.85 SVMC Market, outdoor P P PP P P A = Accessory use, C = Conditional use, P = Permitted use R = Regional siting, S = Permitted with supplemental conditions T = Temporary use Ordinance 16-010 Page 7 of 10 DRAFT Section 4. Adoption. Chapter 19.85 SVMC is hereby amended as follows: 19.85.010 Marijuana production standards. A. Marijuana production shall be located or maintained at least 1,000 feet from the nearest property line, measured from the nearest property line of the marijuana production facility to the nearest property line of any one or more of the following uses: 1. Vacant or undeveloped parcels owned by public school districts pursuant toas established in RCW Title 28A; 2. Vacant or undeveloped parcels owned by public library districts pursuant toas established in chapter 27.12 RCW; 3. Vacant or undeveloped parcels leased or owned by the City; provided the following shall be excluded from consideration under this sectionSVMC 19.85.010: a. Any stormwater facility or right-of-way parcels owned or leased by the City and designated or identified as a stormwater facility or right-of-way in any document, plan or program adopted by the eCity eCouncil; and b. The Appleway Trail; or 4. a. Any facility, or building, campus, or collection of buildings designated or identified in any document, plan, or program adopted by the eCity eCouncil as "Spokane Valley City Hall" or other similar term that identifies such facilities or; buildings, campus, or collection of buildings as the eCity's primary administrative and legislative location; or b. CenterPlace. B. Marijuana production in the regional commercial and community commercial zones shall only be permitted indoors. 19.85.020 Marijuana processing standards. A. Marijuana processing shall be located or maintained at least 1,000 feet from the nearest property line, measured from the nearest property line of the marijuana processing facility to the nearest property line of any one or more of the following uses: 1. Vacant or undeveloped parcels owned by public school districts pursuant to as established in RCW Title 28A; 2. Vacant or undeveloped parcels owned by public library districts pursuant toas established in cchapter 27.12 RCW; 3. Vacant or undeveloped parcels leased or owned by the City; provided the following shall be excluded from consideration under this sectionSVMC 19.85.020: a. Any stormwater facility or right-of-way parcels owned or leased by the City and designated or identified as a stormwater facility or right-of-way in any document, plan or program adopted by the eCity eCouncil; and b. The Appleway Trail; or 4. a. Any facility; or building, , : - ... • : designated or identified in any document, plan, or program adopted by the eCity eCouncil as "Spokane Valley City Hall" or other similar term that identifies such facilities; or buildings, campus, or collection of buildings as the City's primary administrative and legislative location; or b. CenterPlace. Ordinance 16-010 Page 8 of 10 DRAFT B. Marijuana processing in the regional commercial and community commercial zones shall be limited to packaging and labeling of usable marijuana. 19.85.030 Marijuana retail sales standards. A. New marijuana sales shall not be permitted within any zone. B. Marijuana sales uses in existence and in continuous and lawful operation prior to the date of these regulations shall not be deemed nonconforming and shall be permitted as a legal use subject to the following: Mmarijuana sales shall be located or maintained at least 1,000 feet from the nearest property line, measured from the nearest property line of the marijuana sales facility to the nearest property line of any one or more of the following uses: 41. Centennial Trail; 42. Appleway Trail; G3. Vacant or undeveloped parcels owned by public school districts pursuant toas established in RCW Title 28A; 134. Vacant or undeveloped parcels owned by public library districts pursuant toas established in €chapter 27.12 RCW; g5. Vacant or undeveloped parcels leased or owned by the City; provided any stormwater facility or right-of-way parcels owned or leased by the City and designated or identified as a stormwater facility or right-of-way in any document, plan or program adopted by the eCity eCouncil shall be excluded from consideration under this section; or 4a. Any facility or, building, campus, or collection of buildings designated or identified in any document, plan, or program adopted by the eCity eCouncil as "Spokane Valley City Hall" or other similar term that identifies such facilities; or buildings, campus, or collection of buildings as the City's primary administrative and legislative location; or 213. CenterPlace. 19.85.040 Other licensed or registered marijuana uses prohibited. Marijuana production, marijuana processing, and existing marijuana sales shall be permitted pursuant to SVMC 19.85.010, 19.85.020, and 19.85.030. All other commercial and non-commercial licensed or registered marijuana uses are prohibited within all zones of the City. This prohibition includes, but is not limited to, marijuana clubs or lounges and marijuana cooperatives. This prohibition does not apply to home growing or processing of marijuana by qualified patients or designated providers in residential zones as set forth in SVMC 19.85.050 and in compliance with state law. 19.85.050 Marijuana production and processing in residential zones. Washington State law authorizes qualified patients and designated providers to produce marijuana and to process marijuana in dwellings, residences, domiciles, and similar housing units under limited circumstances and with limited processing methods. Subject to applicable federal, state, and local laws, any owner, lessor, or leasing agent may request or require disclosure of a renter or lessee's desire to produce or process marijuana within a rented or leased dwelling unit. In addition to compliance with any applicable state or federal laws and regulations, lawful production or processing of marijuana by any person in a dwelling, residence, domicile, or other similar housing unit shall be subject to all locally applicable land use, development, zoning, and building regulation requirements, including but not limited to all applicable requirements set forth in Titles 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 and 24 SVMC as the same are now adopted or hereafter amended, and the following regulations: A. Any home production or processing of marijuana by any person pursuant to state law shall not be permitted outside of the dwelling or accessory structure; Ordinance 16-010 Page 9 of 10 DRAFT B. Any home production or processing of marijuana by any person as allowed by state law in a dwelling or accessory structure shall be enclosed, blocked, or sight -screened from the public right-of-way and from adjacent properties so that no portion may be readily seen by normal unaided vision or readily smelled from such locations. Accessory structures shall be permanent structures enclosed by a roof and walls on all sides and connected to a permanent foundation. For purposes of SVMC 19.85.050, accessory structures shall not include cargo containers, recreational vehicles or other similar types of structures. Accessory structures shall be completely opaque in addition to necessary site -screening; C. Home processing of marijuana shall not involve any combustible method and shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws and rules, including all standards adopted by the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board; and D. Production or processing of marijuana by any person pursuant to state law in a dwelling or accessory structure shall only be allowed in the R-1, R-2, R-3, and R-4 zones. Section 5. Moratoriums Terminated and Repealed. The moratoriums adopted pursuant to Ordinance Nos. 14-021, 15-017 and 15-023 are hereby terminated and such Ordinances are hereby repealed and shall be without any force or effect as of the effective date of this Ordinance. Section 6. Other sections unchanged. All other provisions of Appendix A and Title 19 SVMC not specifically referenced hereto shall remain in full force and effect. Section 7. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provided by law. Passed by the City Council this 12th day of July, 2016. ATTEST: L.R. Higgins, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 16-010 Page 10 of 10 1'ACIiI.u•t A Sfitika .0000Villey COMMUNITY DtvELou 113NTDEPARTMENT PLANNING fIvlSION STAFF REPORT AND R.ECOMMENDATION 10 TILE PLANNING COMMISSION CTA -2U16-0001 STAFF REvoRT DATE: May 12, 20]6 (updated from April t4, 2016 version for pubic hearing based upon modifications sought b}' Planting Comm iss]ort). HEARING DA•tT AND LOCATION: itirlsy 12, 201(. beginning at 6:01 p.m., Spokane Valley City Hall COtincil Chambers, Valley Reclwued Plaza Building, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 101, Spokane Valley,. Washington 99206. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: A city initiated text arnendmient to Spokane Valle} Neiunicipul Code (SVMC) to amend SVNIC 19.85 and Appendix A. to add dlefinitit,rr3 irc1 ,modify the rc.,tllatians to prohibit any additional state -licensed r;:tail Sales of inarijua t:. incl,idin * regulations kr licensed r'elail stoics titi'ith medical) marijuana endorsements, to allow existi -:,. licensed marijuana retail t,117.;: to locate within existing allowable zones in compliance with ex...,t ua ir,:: I.LLluiror-,.!r,r . to narijuarrt cvoperatio'e:, and to add general requirement `'ysl ;+II s, ,rr,t �r,�ti int ".�� :It:alili it I}aticris in residential 7.0US, PROPONENT: City of Spokane Valley Cr} F1 1II1ky 1.:.clt ltrn.nq 1 41tnrctnent, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Suite I OG, Spokane Valley, WA 99206. APPROVAL. CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVNIC) 'Title 17 43i nUr<'lr ?roviMorts. SUMMARY of Ri COMMENDATtO(\: The Planning Divisions rniikr'y ❑o statement of recommendation regarding the proposed amendments other than Lira, LILA iny :,.: , 'irI li ;.iTh City text amendment requirements pursivant to SVMC :7.80.150(F). STAFF PLANNER; Cltr'isli,na Janssen. Planner, Community I.1cl'r=1,\1'.r,t�rir ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Ordinance Na. 14-021. adopting a rnoratoriurn on ::11 rth:l'tIl :hll:; rl:. ; ciherthan recreational production, processing, and retail tr<e 1 ccn.s+:cl t,� rl,� '+:r . h �t,i. '.;h(4.' I ,i�trrrr :roc. Cannabis Board. Ordinance No. 15-02.3, adrrprint, ;u. cxter,tiic)n 011 0'1.. tlr;l.icem.cd nh;rriioana uses. Exhibit 2: Ordinartcc Mo. 15-017, adopting a ntorate•r-rtinm rrrt Inarijuar;a uses RN to be licensed by the Washi von State Liquor and Canti Exhibit 3: Proposed text amendments to S''M1. 19.t S, V1w1t' I 9.120.050, and Appendix A. A. EACKCROIJ1`+I) IN'FORMATIt:)N 1. :'.PPtJc.i.-t'iur'' 1'Izf?cEssi,4:: SVNIC Chapter 17.80, Pcnrrit Processing Procedures. The l`nllnwin.z appli:.ation procedures fur the proposal. Process Ordinance 11O2 passed, adopting interim definitions anti regulations for state -licensed recreational marijuana Date 2/11/14 Ordinance 1.4-004 passed, adopting amendments tU the Mite= regulations for state -licensed recreational marijuoria Ordinance 14-00S passed, adopting definitions- and regulations for state -licensed recreational marijuana and repealing interim development regulations adopted pursuant to ordinances 1'1-002 and 14-004 4/22/14 7/22/14 Ordinance 14-021 passed, adopting a moratorium on the establishment of all marijuana uses other than marijuana producers, marijuana processors, and marijuana retail safes as licensed by the Washington State Liquor :snd Cannabis Board (previorasly Ma "Liquor and Control Board"). Ordiraanee No. 15-017 r•,r.-.sed. adopting, a morale}riurn ctn all marijuana ,i ctiirprred io bt Ila:t•r ..id or registered with the Wash _ on Sr. Ic l.iga.a and l`:.nn:.l,is l3 yard', 12P9/14 10x6/ l 5 Ordinance Ni) 5-02; lJas:,.cl, adoptirti a six-narrnth renewal of the n (:rags:ri;rirr On 'inI Z riIU;I a inD5 originally adopted 1 arrsu..,a 10 (_irlin rnww NO, 1 4-1.}t 1 SF.PA Determination 1211115 April 8, 2016, for current proposal, and June 21/. 2414, for existing regulations Published Notice of Public Hearing Sent Notice of Application for C'pticnal D:terminatiion of Non-Sigaificance slalPagrPncies April 22, '2p16 and April 29, 20I6 February 26.2016 PKo?oS, u flAC: r .;KOLM): hrillgh the rxrursc of meetings an October 22, 2015, 'November 12, 2(}I5, and December 10, 2015, Planning Commission lre;rrd multiple reports front staff, SpokaneValleyfrolic., and Spokane Valley Vire, as well as receiving extensive public comment on the City's regulation of legal nrrarijuana. Staff reports included discussion of existing City regulations, Stale law, ongoing rulemaking by the Washington Liquor and Cannabis Board (`- VSLCB") related to ail licensed marijuana types and. dor Washington Department of Health related to medical marijuana (although the Departnlearl f -Health has since categorized medical marijuana as '`compliant marijuana" due to ongoing questions about its beneficial medicinal qualities), and a rank of options for Planning Commission to consider_ Planning Comrni.ssion also visited a marijuana production.'prticLwsing iveradon and retail store an March 3, 2016. The background of these discussions are included as part of the R.POA for the public hearing on this code text amendment. Planning Commission considered various options and ultimately gave a consensus for staff to draft proposed arrrcralantnt language that would ban nil new mairijiu:rnn uses, allow home growing, require notice bti reriu rs to landlords for home growing, arid ban horn: Ca April 14, 2016, Planning Commission held a public Iir, T L„ ila iia ,a.° , ti. ',N1 -11 d1 generally would prohibit any new marijuana uses- One inlr:res( c. l-a:rr, :.I .•1,,. i]rrrin . 1)1 1,1ri: 17carin�„ As part of deliberations follo'wr-ing the public hearing, Planning Page 2of8 substantial modifications to the propusul as described below. Pursuant re SV: riC: 17.80. I a{rllsl, the Planning Commission is alllowed. to modify a proposal, but must first conduct a public llerriu on 1Iw modified proposal if the modification is substantial. Accordingly, the P1.11tniltp al,rrltitixi::s i; Il::ciin,_ :a public hearing on the modified proposal on May 12, 2016. The modified proposal is to amend Spoknwc Valk, 411'r, l i .:sl Cede (SVMCll chapter 19.120.1150. and Appcndi.r A by (1) Fidciil;L (.1..!11,r.linas for medical marijuana endorsed reiail tva'i 3, marijuana c operrtivcs, and marijuana club6, (i inulribiting any new licensed marijuana from all zones, (3) ulluwi.l r i..tiiig !Icer o.1 marijuana retail stares to locate within tl'r rxislillu designated zones in cotnn:i:1nc,' ,. tI t ,srirr 'lnifering requirements, (4) prchil:riti., :lrl.i_jtr4Lll k cooperatives from all ZO-1IS_ 1.5j prolribilrnl, Irlar, ulurtt clubs cr lounges from all awes, and .;6j r4t;uirirl any home -growing by qualir'ea 11_rlient: as :k11i-iwod, by state law to he conducted only in lint:l;: ratnil\ resideriIi ul tones in penaaneiii siructiI i that Linc opaque and not visible by neighbors or from ll.o lrt_LI,c rights-of-way, and to c.I.l: ill iii.il rcii tors may be requ[red. as may be authorized by federal, state, and local laws, to give notice: Lo lanclord.ls or their iris inion to grow marijuana plants in a rental dwelling_ The trtujar changes laHoe oripinn! p:[,I,.asal were to (1) allow licensed tnarijunna production :rid processing in existint], f, [1 ti :,x U4.-inii-liance. with existing buffering requirements, and (2) allow existing licensed marijuana rc:trni1 stL,cs tea I.Ictr_ atitl:irt ci.isting allowable zones in compliance with existing buffering requirements. Recr ecrt'r'onet! Mor Brre•k};r-c+ui!' Recreational marijuana was le2a1ibc1 within Washington Shite with the: passage of Inili:,rivo ~O2 fl -502) in November 2012. The Stare has; 1.:orkttl ever the last three years to develop extensive r..__',lrl,dinrtis for licensing and permitting of production (vowing), processing, and retail sales of reereali.mal rrarijt:ana, All recreational marijuana facilities must re licensed by the WSLCB. The WSLCI3 be t•i ziceLTIIIT and processing aplplications in November 2013, a.nd issued the first production and process%nE_ I: n e_, within Spokane• Valley in March :ION. As provided by law, the WSLCB developed rales to ailow:u.:. Iinaitc.d number ofretail licenses within titch jurisdiction. The City was allocated three recreat l lt,i1 I .'1 tiro and the WSLCB has issued all three licenses and all strops arc open and operational. 1...ln:te, state 1::Lu, there is no restriction on the number of prod action and processing Facilities allowed. State law provides 1,000 foot buIF: rs between licensed marijuana facilities and several 34titirtive uses, including schools, libraries, and Fub]ic parks, but excludes trails and r.Ir.:. ti's Iped seliool or library property. The ''.,;,/!--;1_.C11c''.,;,/!--;1_.C11 enfoi u the shite buffers through the state iicer wi k lir ;w.e:-';. On Jarl:ary 16, 2014,�1� a 71'ashivi4i.:'ll t. e11.a-,t! n.w5 1"L` l:.l ill iI1:iC prrf5'rd'(l opinion was that luc.tl „carr: not prck;-,rnCc:rl by 1-502 Iron) acl�;l,nns !•„.', L ttl:Iri I ul[I restrictions on stale-liceiii d i_`t'it' ['.1.'ii 1":Iarijuarm a cs. ilii' L ity's `1utfc.r- ,1 r:° in -r[I,lil.imi mandated butlers and are .cr.t'Jrec:c::1ti' k1.i. illi. All rnttrijuann uses remain illegal i:ricI :l Inti Ccd,21.,:1 C:i.rntriillccl ` tthstan.„:cs rlcr, 1 Ic v,o'ci, llrc' t: riitcd State Departlnc'slt r f.lt:s[i' Iia- rdlua-ell :r pt,i cy: 10 Iii}_ Ili ccrit 1ic. ii. eti In1:ri ran;l pr=.:t.idr..I'3 ill slates which have lC:!iilr/.e[1 !nariji.an,t bite L strong L.nlllr4'L';[+-:I11 :II id rc'a.,ul ac' v * llt'ri14. i• b:rr'e?.cerr irti[ri rtfridl[d 13cat:i:C�P•�Jiri7fr,� In 1998, voters approved d10 ntciclii.A1 use of iill:tt{'.1 in SCU�C. In 2011_ the asltirlL,ttoi' Stare i.L!.LsIatrlrL :!,trite i1 :Il•rcr.;'I:,fill::. t,,s .It: ri 1iiL:ul Ir�:il, Iksl;! !.i'•':ti that would have created a state r.,4 istry For paticn n['. lt', :.l i,:ea list}c [ . trI•.::, .11dd .:74.:111!.'.7.11 The Governor vetoed al _L"t'.L711: r-,'.Ifhied La the 4r.lLL :i.i.t 1 l,...1:: " ,1.iN,i,:r:t 11 confusion rind leavirT L_cjl'Lt:L:tiv.2 gftiJc`ns [r`; the :: il.i Ine:ms 16r ;:•r'.i.1trL;['I;s ,ii 1 .i.:: r,,; Irlt ri•_::I marijuana. The City Slid Iri:i reL.j.iintinr.s at Li;:' lr:liti, l -n issued I.I IIL': 1..1':.,..‘,;!1:11::,I , '. collectives, provided the). ‘).•eru located t:t tl LUTIL' V4'' -127t '!CI i:l `'.'.1 ti r;L;IL ;.ttl1'ropri11ate. Ili'I: ;ii-� :,E. 1 I.::l',”: ,' s:.:'1 '.;','CI VL1-y ,1"ti[_n;�r �iiid 5L'1:1r ii rl':.kl k-j.r:911;,. 1-502 and legalization 1)I re�'-c,rti:,n.il rl IA tt,I:l,,:.,- IraF I 1 - regulatory regimes — a licensed. and regulated rzeneaticriztl market and art unregulated and Jitliccstsect rrtl dical market. Lrt 2015, the Washington State L,er,islatiire passed major changes to existing medical rttarijuana laws in an effort to reconcile the medical iiid rccrc:1Li3r•,al marijuana markets_ There were two primary brills pass :d as part of the changes: Second Subsiiautc Scrialte Bill 5052 (Cannabis Patient Protection Act) and Second Engrossed Sccorid Substitute I4lolt,,c Rill ?116. 'rhe major changes included the following: Recrr,rcrle / kdical afrrtRetrealloo 1 Maryiraw +tfrfrkces Estalishes a "medical rttarijttatm endorsement" for licensed niarijtrana retailers. This crndor er[tent allows a licensed retailer to sell rnedicinal marijuana to qualifying patients and designated providers, • -rhe medical nl:ti'ijilati:t endorsement cl[w_, I101 prohibit the licensed retailer from also selling. recreational marijuana_ + QL.talitl/iti,g patients and designated Sr -it ell. Sr: to s marijuana tax when purchasing medical rrr ri tl:l t ' f•r tm ictill..2r with ai Gtiec'.ical rnarrjuatnrt endairsemerai. + Anyone over the age or 21 may 1,•:r -::I1.1!;.7 any of 'Ilc :t-.ar htiatn:r Sold .ata retail store, crirctic:ss of ulictlier it is °ii 1QJical" tiii. ., ,:rt�d ru .is i,'l l:an[ [far:.juuea by the Dtparl1riielr. [ f I I::. IAAi) nr "r� re,ir,ictti,tl"}. rim r'::.?. ;uirho-I/:Ition dill ithase that qualify: r �: nt;,1,:1.:* I:1 1 -1 • ::'.I�'rll, a.:l,_ ''rti. i ISI s its •.,i d_t I: rc tn.�t7iti, , , :t rlti that authorlz.e neem to purchase IIil• I�_ it ttC�1:',IIIItl7,l. It.1SL heopctatiorial by July I, 2-016. must cease operations as °f lluly l 2016. 4r ▪ l.i'1= t',ust t•ec0s)sider• and increase number of retail outlets to accommodate medical tricrst :!ci'ulol, mcri[ based a alica tio:i process for ri::w retail license. !mist Iticdiica`llrtsarijuan. needs. ;� cstrict tial: LLC t:-.In'..`r +..:!', 5 511-[i11r lirl,lr7:1 t ti'ii ictI rt to beady lieuesed marijuana I3rueessurs(It« horic lite' t t�pt}:.3FLrtr;e.5and SliLvent;s). I ctai'- I s Ivo.° tet:.t;Ii iiL t -)r h\ drive -up windows. 1'. [:1:3115 7L:5 ,1 tr°I IiwlltYrl:.CI ,li :ti:t:' C for COM mon b tweert licensed facilities. _'.Scat ]litillCS .i r'tl:; iTjil'.a a I= Ii.`.{,. • Allows Ii 4s,;t:'.1 I.. _:i otters to research este nic; l potency, clinical inVc51.'. L?t'.l•..i;S into arid el Beaty and saat'ety of administering ll,c�l:�,I al . ,Irltl.:il. ,st1:1 ?c'. corriu4t „crtclrni4 car aur li:arid research. ,:..It,lrl :::i;_.rl,''c: ,I'. 1.11t ; r1.`It1! •:.ts of Iger ltcc;ti+`c. processors. and retailers providing Ii;`-crise t;ac Iitc1Iities ars n iiirijuaina producer, processor, cr r�rl�'sltC;T. .i��eJ .1 rf,'� �.r'F.i—i:F:�4', r•.'ftt` ': I,i .r: lst 7, ri.7l IIsi. L.:I,7:11'uC1 '.! I1.;.:t,2C. [I1:rrllHindi ..L',OlrCITiJ. e W _L Flay be , , I1JLL I:_: Ir al 17;:(1I ,"t:'iIt''3'ni'I�;ltte"I.; ,:111-107 I,c !,.0-._;:55_76 .kill::. r, r.7IIC` of [rtarilli•ii a I 't,'_'.{ut' rr reel of ▪ l talar?I.Itgi,t, r:,.t al. JI wrl :`lilts cars „u'.,°I I`ur•I c :µr!:s I';'r I. tr:msil library, cir :i: 1!:..:,al)le gaiii<` arcaiie. Page 4 of • Cooperativc 110crAio11: regisi2rod with the li.k'SLCEI. • 1 I[I• mos..I. i Of the participants and only one .111 9Fl1dV ill-.1.‘,11; 'Ili! C,11.1 tnoly ukit NcLAIlity and traceability requiruments for not considcrcl ilur,e. 11).:,tii o 1),.1:Auess aensc4 or Nt-.-ey not locatcl.VilOTC F:. :1 HT:: .;,yr paTvisiort. rtioaA; child Desiglialee! !-- 101,06altli...5T1 In)111 - reeopition card crib. [c...3 into Ow database are necessary to - .Aillounts of marijuana listed on authorization card. yi) Ii nlant.. in house. • F., [,...2r housing no.it re.p,anicss ir ILL hro--dr4 TI.v.2.(0 pkyht) No bc r lin Cr Iii 1„..:1 11 pii• !L. prop..:7( F. Iift ,v 11 1;y.trwpol1 Fo/ provic:c•r_ 111.0.v hi. ivtic..1. '.11 L!. L,/ And cour-ticiIi i.iiihority to adopt and enforce 1:.!:trij1c11t. _ •L,. rpl iY iiiIiiu for riaticnly, aid designated priders by -3052. - ordilancus rc-tioc;oilf he-v.,::::11Hi1ihc asci recr.tat]on arc.akie' which is 1Hhl: branc..-... P.:11 I thOSC: .L'f.° !rcri 1 1L.1 11 iI.in 100 111:1. fltdCd soC:i distance )....111 not riegalivciy rAiP.:R.1 Ili: L:1 ic) i :.i!3FOry erifoirCerriCrilt, cri'inirial Law hc;1111) 1.,01;0 • Holici.; Lc) L.ciwols state feet. - Subject to any rules adOpted Liy (he WSLCB, And iicl)pt an ordinance ..,..1.1cer or proGossor 1re11 i:2, CL 1 'N11.11111 0.11:05 use Or rural 11.7:€.7 Wi[11 1:11111EILIM,7‘1:,..-feS snia]let. J3Fjj! "i rart of the SrAc. 1 :Iv, State muit ipwrc::•.:-.4c thr.i ntrub..2r ra.:11,1 for the I1hnl,c11 Aricrp.,2.ncyr1II2ciLiiii., tho VtiSLC13Iii5 111c;itci icd t0111 iiIL [:t :1;1N 11:.!i. a[loctiled rutiiller or stores in 1111 ity ao.: ihre:e 011guir !cc lit the evi.T,: 1 nioralor11.311. i 1V.:t1 and the City ailowsliddilionoi retail Niurc:.lIie .to six total stores, On Septeiriber 23, 201:J,. its 1;:aor;:ycli".:•,.. Rtilcs 415-18, ...Nnicti antonz, n [her things„ provided for tLi'NV Si .CEI to begin acLcr r.r.fiall license applications beginning on October 12,2(1 15. Vag,: 5 cfrfa TItc: WSLC'B recently released revised proposed rules implementing the changes from the Cannabis Purtent Pii.rectian Act and Second Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill 2136. Those revised rues in i,rl.. l;ur are not limited to the following provisions: - Expanded definition at` -licensed premises". - Removed requirements far °Mr. Yuk" stickers to be on labels for infused edible and liquid products. A different label will be required. - Added mandatory signs at the point of sale on retail licensed premises. - Modified Fiat enforcement provisions to clarify that persons operating without a WSLCB I icease will u� iss ;:+1.tnnI�:cl. - Added language regarding authority of WSLCB to deny registration for cooperatives that do not the W'LSCB rale raquircrnents. pc:r 7lties so ([oat failure to address rrmnretar - penalties for two or mare violation notices° ire orLL p.riod will result in licensee cam:elkiuoa. . `.}r.i[1,2J ra::naltius fiir producers and processors so that all penalties are monetary; product will not be dos._ 1-0_,„..0.1,1 ;is a pe nal [y, The WSLCB final rulemaking is anticipated to be complete ire late spring/early summer of 20I6. Further, the Washington Department of Health is in the nalemakiing, process, but has provided through emergency rulemaking that in lieu of" medical marijuana", certain types of inrarijt-rna will be "compliant" marijuana that will be subject to certain testing and which:may contain higher CBE) ratios or nigher TIBC rotic s. Other than one particular variety of high TI -[C marijuanta, orayrarie over the age of 21 may purchase any compliant marijuana. In discussions with the WSLCB_ they have indicated they will not consider any differentiation of medical retail stores and recreational retail storks, but will instead simply considered licenser:I retail stares. The Department ofF-iealtlt has adopted Neral ra[Iez. requiring any retail store with a medical inarijttana endorsement to hove a certified medical marijuana cortsnitani on staff Final rulemaking on the other i,spccts of compliant marijuana and the medical marijuana authorization database is anticipated to be complete lay June, 2D16_ City Regula/o y & ckgrottml. In response to I-502, the City adopted perrnaneiit regulations on July 22, 2014. The regulations, as they now exist? arc set forth in SVMC 19.120.050 (pc: pitted use matrix) and SVMC. 19.85 and provide as follows: - State licensed marijuana production is a permitted use in Heavy industrial and Light Industrial zones, and indoor growing only is permitted in Regional Commercial and Community Commercial zone. - State licenser] marijuana processing is a permitted rise in the Heavy Industrial and Light Industrial zones, and packaging ani labeling of ora a.10,1c rrurijunira only is permitted in Regional Commercial and Community Commercial tones. - Both production and processing uses inaa not. I.r Ic. i[kh[I viii? 1,00D feet of City 1-lal1. Centel-PIrtue, vacant City property (other t1. sno, zry'vatcr :arrcf p.rl7li� I i? 'rt, -anal ar ret n library property, and vacant school prcperly Prialtrctic'ira and pror:: sti;r;,; may 'tu 1 rttctl .. iilei:r 1,000 feet of the Appleway Trail, pry,ideci 11. r,. ii is it [Ire :_Iiprcrpriate 7.0 rc ,;it'cre ;are Lcw Regional Commercial and Community Cornnaerci i zones within i1001) beet :71` clic ;%.IapIcv ay Trail). • State licensed marijuana salmi arc permitted in the Mixed Lisa Garter. Coriidor Mixed L;e, Regional Corraratcrcira!, and f.,..:011in-lundy Corrrrnemi l cones. Page 6 of 8 - Licertse:d retail sales may not be located within 1,000 feet of City 1-1211: Cclttc:rl'1ace, vacant City property (other than storinwatcr and public rights-of-way), vacant libt'ury propetlly, vacant school property, the Appleway -frail, and the Centennial Trail. Further, after the passage of 1-502, the City saw an increase an the number or collectives (unregulated medical i iirijttaata] seeking, business registrations. The City passed a moratorium on unlicensed marijuana uses (e,g., primarily medical marijuana) pursuant to Ordinance No. 14-021 uu December 9. 201.4 to allow the City to detenrilte what action the State would take to reconcile the mcdical and recreational marijuuna markets and to develop its own regulations. In response to the WS1.CE's Emergency Rules nn September 23, 21715 (described {shovel. the City adopted Ordinance No. 1,-(.117, which established a moratorium on mari :iw4r1tic11 by the k'SLCB in order to allow Lite City to uornplete the consideration, clr,:><•.:lopire.ro, aii i trloprion or its regulations without allowing additional licenses t0 vest or create pat:r.tr:ill-, silt,! iliconpatilale uses. The moratorium did not impact existing marijuana tisei which Iiud al!LagiIti Li license frcni the 1 'SLC8. t:-iowev'cr, it will prevcnt the City from processing any alt l,IicaIic,nr from _.:1.::'. t ves which wish to receive ;i retail license from the \V S1.C1L- Further, the Inoratori'.tii- cI: 1 ii i i:nl:a t ; l[Ii tiume use or ccinsumptiort, This proposal sterns from a requirement originally adopted pursuant to c.rdiii.ilicc No. lel-021 and subsetlucntly also Ordinance No. 15-017. Pur'silarit to both ordinances. t1l2 _:itr cscabIislied a work plan to work through and adapt permanent regulations for all rriarijuana Uses.'this proposul coirstitates the permanent regulations required pursuant to Section 3 of Ordinance No, I4-02.1 and Section 3 or Ordinance No. 15-017, B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC C -ro THE INIUNI1C.l.PAL CODE TEXT AMENDMENT 1. Cum pliance with Title 17 (General Provisions or the Spokane Valley Mtrrticipal Crile a. Finding: SV;v1C` 1 ;.';'I. i'I 1`:nii,i i!i!tl C:.c10 Mit r'S.r17c't1r.'.t i:rnl ." pprco.71 :`rtcria i°. rhi; i..1mil:111II i ,5i1�:"'EX! iltncllc.lit-cllt. ''. 11 : ir1Lti that (I 1 i li:::: L1xjsed te;•,1 ,11:y:ud!11.;nk :ipillitabk (.'•:?11i'..I.ti:herlSiVe Plan; Staff Analysis: Elie amendment iscorlsistentwith 1.1k-1, L.-iipr, lti.o,i-E I'l.1 i Ir„etecting residential areas, protecting commercial 11S 1. iIiiriurt.r:" 11 i'•}lu and iisi••tent regulatory environment, and promoting ;:;1:1lEtI;I il_,' l,t.'aec11 idjucent Lind uses. Further, the proposed amendments of residential neighborhoods by prohibiting cooperatives alae lirrl:lin;. s;ccorJ.i . irrrpacts on survouncling properties for any medical growing will.io residen_i:11 ,°:,,i,c;• through cotnpliance with land rise and building codes. Relevant Comprehensive Plan goals and policies arr s.1_0wrt below: LUP-1,1: Maintain and protect the character or existing and future residential neighborhoods 'hrough the development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations and joint planning. [:1 `P-1.2: Protect residential areas from ilrl''tict3 ni etijaccrrt n{ori-r4r cl: r,liltl uses .d11rlr01 1111:[1.21- Liit4.11Slt]' '.:illi 11;1' ll ti t1;c ;1t l'c1{1tk1i .:ill !:l;LI 1.:Zit.i2 I_LlrtCllt ..t tI t City'S :1r:il ll:=t reurrlations a t'.oint plinitnt!,. kind USC Ursa! LUI'-1112: Encourage a diverse array of industries to locate in Page 7 o t' Economic Goal EDG-7: Maintain a regulatory environment that offers flexibility, consistency. predictability and clear direction. Economic Foliar IDP -7.1: Evaluate, monitor and improve development standards to promote coiiiputibiIity between adji ceitt hind uses' and update permitting processes to ensure that they are equitable, cost-effective, and expeditious. Economic Policy EDP -7,2: Reviedevelopment regulations periodically I{ ensure clarity, consistency and predictability. hlei.thorhood Policy NP -2.1: Maintain aid 111,': C:r [itr , 1 .1 r„ t1 1" .isting and I-I41111-�> residential neighborhoods through of the L 'i1w' land use regrilations and It7[nt planning. d'':. The prop,oscci aniundrneiit bears a, substantial 1'LI.11.1.'0 1'111111'.. Ilt:.l1:li. : Co.,* 1c'I:1�u, Enid protect kilt or the environment'. •1tia1ysis: 'flit proposed Yini411dltrent will :ltln:'.' collu„Iirutcc with slat,_ I s I rt l' [tiliI'g state-11cepsed ret rentiorial and medical I! -:ir j IR!!1;1 I1ntii[' "tiS :t -,: ciy::rate within the Spokane Valley while 4.:JcI1'altl'{ '-t1t.1'• llse tion, .!i'S11'Itl;.:,i 21lsitive uses and the City's existing and Ifltl.re I'cSidontiiii uses. I urillLr [!: do..c.titnenr will limit additional adverse impacts Irc71u new Mac 01 ,: isting commercial uses. 1^Inully, the propu e4,1 :t1.1&.intik'-lit t+'ill 1]x;.11+'•-[ r -: ,c,,iJc:lti,.l character terIesideritial neighborhoods. 1.,11111:d 11sitill j: rt r• r.,= lut':tl :,'115-i l4.;11 .. r: .0 l ;:. 1'l: '111'?1'[W:Li :::!1 is c ill ,i,l .,.i 'I' Ole SVMC. Fint.li tt; and i,lint:ltlsitrn; DL 11ailL' fl) 1'It.ltl' [.11IYinI .'[1ts a. Findings: No public confluents have been received to duce on the modified proposal, h. Conelusidlnls Adcgu:uc ii11biic r:1IIdUcted for CTA -7015-0006 in accordance with adopted ptdllie, noticing pmceclures Finding and Conclusions Specific t1l Agency Comments _ Findings: No .igeslcy comments have been received to date. b• Comet r.ision( ); No concerns [Ir_ noted. C'. OV.E dA.LL C(}N :i_i SIGN 1 .1c proposed G(ll:' l =il ;111C.11 IS 1 i ,i,l,:;l ;1L:rI: L`.1 1'• HIS; r'['Ir`?prI'.Ilc l'151 ' `�l.lii:1 11i1i+cie and goals. D. STAFF RECoMlI!:NDA i ION Thu ?1.lnninu, I)ivis•t)n, after reviuw and csinsideration of the sub:IY.r.cz. 1-1:1 Id..:11, 11 iuld applicable oprlt'v:il criteria. I711iI,tis 110 rece!'nInL1'dar.lt1ll as to the. approv,ll '11L; r. -dated td) 111oalued,-5:1, ret'tr1 sales a71 stma-licensed recreattt1rr1. marijuana, and land li L' '11101 mice medical mart t.1111a 111'l}ill,'titt'?11 :1111,1 processing within. 1I. ICi'=1111.!1 fi'[1L'ti_ exct:7t tFiTt 17'r'p115•.:t1 :1'11Cnd[ricats inti '1 il.i t.: 11 ,':sill 1.. 11iipreI1ensive Platt nod icie.s rind roals and !T:cC:t the UtI, ri_t .-;12E It1 :11 iIi 8Vt 1C 17.ti: row!, 8 of 8 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, AV ASHINOTON ORDINANCE i'tiO. I4-Il21 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE, COUNTY, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A MORATORIUM ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF ALL MARIJUANA USES OTHER THAN MARTS ANA PRODUCERS, NLARIJ[IANA PROCESSORS, AND PrIAn.IJtA 1A RETAIL SALES AS LICENSEE] BY THE WASHINGTON STATE LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 69.50 RCW AND REGULATED BY CHAPTER 19.35 SPOKANE VALLEY ibivNic1PAL CODE A O SPOICA.NE VALLEY NIUMCZI'IIL CODE SECTION 1.9.120.O50, AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WL-IE:LEAS. since 14741, federal law has prohibited the mdnuFacttrre and possession or marijuana as a Schedule 1 drug, based an the Federal government's catr:;;arizaaion cf marijuana as having tt "bier potential for abuse, lack of any accepted medical use, and absence of any accepted safety far use in medically supervised treatment,' Gorizales ti. Raic/7, 145 U.S.. 1, 14 (2005), Controlled Substance Act, S4 Stat. 124.-2, 21 U.S.C. SOL et Nog; and hllivREAS, Iniliatit'e Measure No. 692, approved by the voters of '.`'..-ir,ingtan Slate on l�c;bci,7h r 3,:' 98, and now codified as chapter .69.5 IA RCW, created un ,:e e•nse For to the charge of possession of near ii uanE; and W1 I RP.AS, in 2011, the Washington State Legislature considers:. c:I.d I.a3s- L.`_ -.;SSB :a `E;' [hat. authorized the licensing of medical cannabis dispe):.0 ics, 11eil1tie5, ..ricl l:;c:,essiuti raiilities, (2) permitted qualifying patients to receive GL'Et.riii .,nra:„{;r r,r Tor n •_l,a.r, cl. I_tirpses From designated providers, (3) permitted c0llectiv, ;,rr.lc ns l,_ rr7 .lit_ i:,t� _, lir ❑ls tl: consistent ',villi state Taw, collectively grown mii.lOarl,! 9',, 'heir rnvr� rise, ('I) t rr,lir l :li,tt r i.iprt were authorized to continue to use their zoning Autl,,; ii :w1q:lapr❑duccior1, disiavrisirrg cif marijuana under ESSSB 5073 and ch?uicr "'l :art RCW their and vv.`t ° i1-i.REAS, on April 29, 2011. former governor ChristineC ..Li: y vetoed tate portions of ESSSI3 5073 that would have provided the legal basis for Legalizing and licensing medical ctitrreabis dispensaries, processing facilities, and production facilities, thereby making these activities illegal: and WiTEItEAS, on No'vernbcr 6, 2012, voters of tate State of Vilu'Irilt:2.1-.on ;:pl,r� ved I•,atiativL Measure No. 502 ("1-502"), n.ow codified in chapters 6' .50, 1G.04, 46.20..1 2I . talo-16.6is„iI Code of Washington ("RCW"), which provisions, (1) decriminalized possession and us;u c,r c rta.r:i sr„ r.}r1nts .7r marijuana and rnarijua.na paraphernalia; (2) amended state laws pertaniiri inherence of into' is eE,ts to include driving under the influence of marijuana; or, r story, system licensing producers, processors, rind retailers of recreational ntarijttan;! ',, �r age and older, and required the ).Vashingiort State Liquor Control Board (lite '`l...:l; ,I A:1u,,.1 Ii.:fu i urns and criteria by December 1,2011'3 for issuing licenses to produce, process, and s::IL ,,e;rr dru, r-.:iiul WHEREAS, an August 29, 2013, tate Lnired Suites Dcp: r:Ekte: of providing updated guidance on marijuana enforcement in response tri tal-, r<1 1 50=. Several ongoing federal enforcement priorities were outlined., inchu.dirrg, Pi,{+w-i.tio[. or ;:rinw :end preventing distribution of Inarijaana to minors_ Further, the rncino provided Dep.=rt,nci,r '..could not seek. ortgoiiag prosecution of marijuana I7rovid tis, u_crs, ar..J local officials in 's:.ire marijuana, provided that those state :enc local governments "implement strong ans.1 crrccrive regulatory and enforcement systettts that trill I.I I[c•.ss. the threat those state laws could pe`s2 rr. 1-ir7liY solety, public Ordinance I4-021 Page 1 of healr11, int_Y 2 (3. A 3yst:m adequate to that task must not only contain robust cpn,1� Ii ;!.I1d 1 rr ;:Laura:. .Y I`;11±".• 1.17 L1t:5t :1 he effective in pract:cc;" and W[-1ED.EAS, the LCf? iri . itil.::F1::;11v 1 a conlprclu:nsive regulatory scheme for the li4ensirY :'lY'�1:'t�•:.`iY' and .vi`•.-'rc•_-,Tne It o tE:1iia production, processing, and retail sales :dor, u!1CILr d,Avter 314-55 WAC; and WHIRJ AS, irl ";:'1 tit; ,''.'J, Iiiiw...+IY !star . 1 .,.•L•;C.::_rILL::':In::i :4;lt;a!, i:u; did not ndC[1L ; SL ]'$Si: that would li." lIi_ cc. n7I:r licrk.iti _` cheme Far mereatienal 11jr1rijUllIial under [-502 and the lack rat 1 t�u`..s.er, ::.e.a>;, i7: „n corirr;ls Over medical marijuana ttndcr E.haptct 69.5IA RCW; grid WHEREAS, the pu_;scs.;icir1 ircitica[ marij'.ianti, operation of collectivegardens, rid provided by daii2natecl :39:11',r'itJ ts; ' c nL:liri ill.12,3I under chapter 69,-51A RCW and Crrr nejr.'L:.•Ir.'el Craal!!:011 v, Oiyt of, rrrt. !NO ti4't'.. App. 455 1261 4i, cert. granted, w.111 suck lcCi''itiC5 only er':tit :ri! rL s:r arfIrntativ'e di Rause; and 'l 1{ER1=r'. R '\1 C.A `iii .145 pr.:3.1iiLiii tlu; C+t _:rlJ1 '! •tet 1 :}r:'::k;•t;e containiEla t77ArCIu Tri `, t15 $E][ti :TlilrLJlia.na, or a rn; ri111;L•11-111[ ;al 1.1 :E+'U I, t'- .:+1115L11i1:5LSC11 Qt Ira:Juana, riquatirc Inarij a1la, r'r r7 ,rlari.9lirina-initr.sect t odiaCt' lvitlur; L it'•'; rsI 191. t.:''I°. .al public,' but t] e5 not otherwise regulate aperaliotl •1l' 3riy fJt'l' tl_" 1S1,Itiivrarta colic-++ 1,1^+tica 1;i iILt: -..-.aping" c'f raurijtJ1^ana extracts Car oils, or outer 'Ir1Iiecilst:rl marijuana Dr. 2t',_t1017S; ;ili WHEREAS, 1Jnlikc recr.,=:t:".... lig:_ ',sod marijuana p;oductia]t, Lader chapter fig `'ti ECI:ti'u. :,I' -,'1. r It' lriit . n:', u545, incLudilzd T:1edic.a1 r1:r j1.1,1:.i 1;u inesses 1'1t_ri; g t]riVBt�" f1[iS'Je1 U:Cri or 5'i'[yrr61' 1C1' .i 111 1:iiaCensed marijuana ;1:-W i:11 -L' 111atdd and al,;; ri4i7 LJFiI CL i:; r':ti'^=':'., .IGyfl.S TY',. ?I '.:,.i '. r4 :'tcilt by the LCB; and y.'t'I ]:-..•;.. L."�4.5. r;Nc Vb:i`l:iiir' IL '17 LeliSlafura. is likely to conSidi.r lid. ;.�l ,l'Yti:.•1Y i'11 ":II;E:rt ',17:Y:'i :i1;I17 Ir: Old upcuminc 2111; I-gis1attv'e session,. but Or. Ciry cannot Clti[LrJiLL17'. '..i i. L11slt !,:.,i;.;:,1•,-, } :t :, . ;,rc•. i• -I a:,r. when or if it will he passed; and ,•J [, 4',i f"r`1 _'i IIY::. ,.I t' i!I :'-iE +L 11 ice: 1' a1I';•v L'alic'u have iitfani i !' ., t•E1vL II',;' --`_it 1':tjlt, 3 L, I.1 :5•'L 1 J'_r 1J.I}1 '. I; it first JO of those 11F: f'.`'TL,' T7C:r ,+.y :`ICI'_r L L Ll:'.r' l,! 2 :Y!iCj Jul) , b _ ,l I rh'' Citi' adapted O:dlnati' No_ 14 I}',,l!i(:tt cs+<:I:,is rcLl in C 1 tI7tE E ;".l L-•1' r1 i:,,:'r ll; , ...1_:; fe:1j1 ,15 a1 Codi.' {"SV[ IC") e'liicl SV v1C : I .a 1 r,;l?I.IlyltiP115, T_tL"li! r, ;.iiI1^rs, and ril 'r HE!' producers, pro' este, r' . '1't., r::1;; 7;4:11'_ I:, '_:r:: it Under ?['lr,'- _an[ +'.111411 <IPar r , -i ".II'..' t''ll "tt marijuana '.r w?: t k:.,.`lwr 7S, to CiIy had at least 18 i i-:[i•.:EI-alarijuana rclat+:d riislnw�sCs rt r' tit <•1 '.�1 1711; rll t.k 'l1'. r} Zti'L11:17 provide marijuana outside of the 1Tet osiI1g, r";;Llatioa, r'riforc.1'_1, cut of [I:;: 1 F 1'i; [10ViC i'I ��41.;1:1L ;?r'v licensed rtoriijuacia pro2w.":ars. Raroccssor,, (}r retai. oL tIC1s utldJwr c!I:1 't r G(1.5 1 I:;'C5V.:lrri 1.E1ne ofh::ich DIVSubjeet to the City's regul:shim under SV),1(' SVh'1i: 19. i 2.1.050;. aa:l \Y[tFRE S, p17 +l.ant 1') Art,cle 11. Er_"'L r r 1 of thr C'ijrysiitllt (r7, the City of S!ul -1.i: ` ;:itlL"r is atrthnri; Ct1 1L. "nihil;' and _n!- w'illii,I i1,; I nli]r :III SLiCS t,:lice ro:;Llati}ns ii irc n•st LI cc3.111ia..1 ',i'I'I "':n rail '.st s �a'i1i'l, incl.Yidcs ilio` ddopticiii cif 5ai, VL l IIin" I CCI. iS:.'s '1.ithi~ tltc C:i13' � ari �- U ki S, RCW 16.7.11,',190 ,:d.• ir1:,t. - 1;y '4'x)vc niTtg IOd. 71!at ,::1•.;1i1:: , G'[�C-lel= �'a.17:c''',� _:, thud. "A G!: m )ratnr:uIl1, iructrin zoning ink), interim zonin crdin nvi , ut Ordironci! 1:1-':]2] interim i)itic .,11 c1111t:-c)I 1ih Jt IY0lt.iii i a 2af5 public hearing on the proposed moratoriums, interim ronitlg map, interim zoning ordinance, or interim official control. shall hold a public hearing an the adopted moratorium, interim zoning itsap. interim zoning ordinance, or interim official control within at ileast sixty days cif its adoption. whether or riot Lite governing body received a recommend;ttion on the matter from the planning cornmission or department. if tho l'4r!r'n body does not adopt findings of fact justifying its action before this hearing, then the c.nv.,::roing body shall Llo 4+,1 immediately alter this public; he.iring. A moratorium, interim zoning map, iut'ariitt ;•:Gillis!, grdin;ilicv, or itlrcriini official control Yidopted r.ride:' section may be eincti~.'e For not ionfr .r than ;i': months, but iiu:ti i.c f tia:: }::; 1 to one year if a work plait is developed for rAleted such a ]cL cr period. A Ln :•r i1 . fi.:llt i it:rlt: !ling Chap; interim zoning ordiiuu1ce or li1i i l�1 C[ c 1 riltiri_ l may i}Y: i ct7e'" (d for tin,: I:l. [ ;i periods if a subsequent public hearing iS held and tlildrrr OL' tact C;}6ltl ['I 'I -.. .,..:'I I•:°° :"•'•'Cil ' a:i ! ]T: r:. "+ .:.!'°..[V _'24 and/or RCW 36.70A.390 is Ll": 5"+".11411 IrY',1I :Lt",W pI ris aid regulations w i flet :C reLndr r -A nic:u' by init:rye n:[[I , d-zvelopi11C:it; ani ;,\-.:, 5.21Q ROW R ;',_ .:w-. `it7 bath authorize the eilactnr[,u of a 111or;i!Ci'''i!rr'. it r rF1:l 'e:',Ji:16ik', Cf:i' 11t':r7,t11 Zvt71C''-. ijrt iiint'spa 0' interim official contrail, prior to lidding a \V:'+,r', ',97-1. 1 • . 1.1w Qr this i rcinatice is oti ail �t Ironr fl:i l'•.. l�,i ll'f ^:r.�,llf:, +": .I 111(�sl':1 '.' chlt.'a'Itlirlo!io11 wider rhi. PQIICV AO... Mid %WHEREAS, the 1•ia l: ,._-i:!-'.LIaatDry 15',er;;.t :ti ?::[1 over lllill t'ii''.CL[ nlarilUFt l:! , medical mini ivi.tlia co11Cci ''C i:id::r..�. de :2:I:ltt!I l;+l-OV::1411'?. aril "prL':cIt [17arlju4.rii1 .':1i'.rki.ei Ilial is Inc'r:tihit_l1[ : l}C1 FCI•Leil b_ '.I.'- t CB ,? I allr u s irsl:l l' .S5 r ac.,.. -3;;;;;;[;? 111,11'Iill:ll!:17+ 171111 71`:, :Lr ;I �} Lri�[.iC"s' .- !:sL lC `.I'.;[ I.uLll.r, I1r;:11ti1, oL Ulu -ack ul i,,,.il;ttiirr 1,':'r'-i;'I[r .l;.il pi,..eillial I .r abuse; ;!rid •.t?I ,' :11 1\;,:r,;:[.1l,trr• , :1114, the Citi' Council ,:idoptr;cl its 21115-20C 7 Legislative tvllcli 11: 11 ,J+_l: Yli 11: i; '-Fait':1: Ll 11lr: ..IL's' {.7,0j/R., , tii•r1C l: ll 'ti'[.'rl li; `-Sktppri the rue il4;11l.itt!)11 tit 111:t aril lflc'i1:4:at devc::npn14'm of one s','sr•Jrii dun i"+`4?L.'I•j [E''_rll;Ii t11''.c;.1 :111':$ 7'.Y-:c:iii:,7rial elintination cci medical rilari,juan[ij, in �wl:'[,','°.11 }e: ',M•.',: LI Y` "St:pport State rq,',cgrulraitionS vii:llL'11 C •;e r°,;'7.ti '•`�It illi ;.0 rr CCII ]r'•ijF}lel:l l'7 ,1` VapLnrg, edibles, oils. and -pi i vale- cu nsii L➢tnliorlffacilitieF; and under Lt d llrSCssirs:i aiid e i itit4I11 pC'C311 WHEREAS, additional time is L"'J- ; r] '7 :''i •'L" 11i {. d!',' L4; l tPii 4:'.LL i '-1 I;:lt`. ",!':(-nrcit Ls uln:ilyc ills allowa 1C `, 3itin , and inecu'S3i1: I:lir:, :,!!` :itl{1115 ft:r ilrlll Itit:'1 Ptt;ll'1�11111'I :;c, iI1:lC' �;?;i li lr'; :i[il l+� 1<'-•.',, ontl to determine what, if an.y, pritiS L:xl l)y the \.-.I".il.�!, It:.l �;,'-t':• Ls:Lrislittur. in Ill:' !Flicrlmi[tg 20l:i. legislative L[I _II i ,1patit ot-S:L..I1 L w; iut on 1 I1—. d marijuana uses within .ii-: City;;�tld l .i.l=.ti :. e moratorium will provide (ha Clay with ;additional time to review and amend ;ts IYu lilt Il ,'.IC'1. :i itt t'. ;gala welfare requirmer1[n artd zoniii am] lain -,1 use regillationa rel itacJ to the 1.`I li,.il Ic. lot :1'.ed (Li E _i i:ian of unlicensed Inaryjualna tees; :Jul !':asltinrttc,n Snug: I:i+�', in 1Llitiii RCN.; 35A.61220 and L C1V 36.21IA,3J'. i111t::"i'i;f"r; =`•',= r.'Iti;i ._l]L;)! 1, I I lrlrt':rli[i 1, p civtdc j i,Ci l i[1' ulriduc.'E a public iie firing on Lha moratorium vIli /111 '1{ :.:1 .•L filo?Ilw U .t'-':! :L1,101..tin +i1 t114` 1!L,.'.r;t4',+I'i'Ir1!, I1Cl WHERf'_AS, [nu iry. has authL)riry innratoriutr, eortcerning the cstabiishi cnt and ur}lrali•;.)11 c:f urtla.:ensL 1 ma iiiLina tiscs as a tlecassary it:,p-LNip !Pleasure: (1) to provide the City tivith fun niiirsirl.CC I4-021 Page 3 ofS opportunity to Study the isst;es associated with siting, and regulating unlicensed marijuana uses, including determining whit, if slily, regulations are passed by the Washington State Legislature its the upconiine 20 i5 legislative session and the impurts n; those laws upon unlicensed marijuana uses, (2) to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the of the City of Spokane Valley by Avoiding and ameliorating negative impacts and unintended consequences of additional unlicensed marijutll't.; Arid (3) to avoid app honors possibly estdbtislting vested rights contrary to and inconsistent with any revisions the City may make for its rules and regulations as a result of 1:ic Lily's 510Lly ,rf this matter; and City Council finds :lis+. ;;i I::ui:.['rrri[;nl :n;rvn,.d ;[nli established by this ;•{tIC'nC 4.", nuc:es arl' :ire..s,_tr. ?11'1.. .-t t:'!C l?I'I1iIa and pi.bLiG peso:_ Tr-ll1 C.?F'f', -1rr: rit;. r.�.:u toil I•titc City crk-:ains rL t :.zhkvti Section Ealjnittar++ l'indllts. The City _cum ;1 adc.p[s I[ findings of fact in support of this Ordinance. Section. hiflratariu Esl orJ. A. The City' Council hereby declares and la�}. c3 a ruuratt✓ri.l It upon the :SLa6inissina, acceptance, processing, modification or approval of any permit applications or licenses by or for unlicensed marijuana use. B, For purposes of this moratorium. °'tnlicensed marijuana use" means the prui7LCtian, growing, processing, rnanutaGtvritig. extraction, infusion into edible solids, liquids dr gummies, allowing consumption on the premises of, sale, distrihwiclrt, or delivery of marijuana, rrturijuatrtrt-infused products, e-htracts, concentrates,. oils.. DT any otl'e' rurlr, of product containing or derived front marijuana and intended for hurnalt use 1.-,y any business,:zsscciation Or Other 5 r. -profit or not-for-profit establishment, including but not Limited to collective gardens, designated providers. medical marijuana dispensaries, ,rn. oriole rr.ar juana "vat+in;;,•' smoking, or consumption clubs, provided, I1owerrer, "unlicensed marl u;ina use" stria I not include a -11r° nt,hrijllarla producer, marijuana processor, or marijuana retailer fust has received and holds a valid i:iarijuana prtlueur, marijuana processor, or marijuana retailer license tool file Washington Liquor Control l '.3rd .pursuant to chapter 69.50 tR.t:W and chapter 314.55 tii''AC:i fiwther, if a building lice":tit or ti4 irli IL'tlll:l'_ I„I<Iri' iS 1 n4uuSJ+t.7 in orclL:r for C to :iht.iin ✓ alid ruarijuana license frnihi fleet V/a Iiir.gton l n,,rcl. ILLI chatirc- 693C [C'. t: c may accept and process such 7enn-. alp its 51aii[y, Liquor Control Board. C. "Unlicensed marijuana use" d,, - I14" ;1:1ti; : ;1:'!; :li:i ii!cIuJk any pc:Nont:LI pos:t?SsiOi1 or LIS; • marijuana, rnarijur"liri:-infused produeis, n1Sr.jl'.:3,•;1 �'.atl-il.;Ls ['it�l 7j 1,1:111;x. 0.1,11.:1;.',IF,Ir'ti, rllairijuana. oils, or other form of product containing or derived ir' i I n,;1 I�L,;sn l .I;rl .11!:,..-.1!:it�:' i1LLI'.i:111 IIS 171' all;a 114r :all pursuant to chapter 69.50 RCV/ or by an'y q,rali , I:r0 l' l';L:1..1 t p. r':.;11.d D. Nulhiliig herein shall affect til 1}r:wce3siit . or consideration •+f any ;sal alc. nLly• submitted complete land -use or built !}e l:e,niit ,1ptica.ions t11:LL -:I>. provridedirnder Washington law_ 5[ ct uLL 3. W 'l}rk Pint). 'I'Itc :aIIoLs ir1 1'r,ar : 1a'.:+' address the issues involving the City's regulartion of. and Lit cs'.ab1ishaLera Lit rtAi rcenSid I:1;Lrlfil:lnii fisc=: A. The City of Spokane Vat'cy P'lattnilig Conaniiss!rin k 'licre il,' ,ilr[linrlr:al ind. dircutCtil tv hold public hearings and public meetings to Rah,. rc ive altrl ce:}r;icicr statenterns, testimony, pusitions, Ordinance 14-021 Pave 1 of 5 curd rather documentation or evidence related to tilt; public Itealtl;, safety, and welfare aspects of unlicensed marijuana uses. B, The City of Spokane Valley Planning Commission Ls 11!:r'by atitharircd and directed to work; with City staff and the citizens uitbe City, as well ull public input received., !..c develop proposals for regulations pertaining to the establishment of unlicensed marijuana tise.t, wlY'c17 rcgutations may provide provisions restricting or limiting unlicensed marijuana use up to and including bates, to be ferwarrted and recommended to the City Council for its consideration. Section 4. Public fearing. Pursuant to RCW 35A.63.22f and 16.70A.390, the City Council shall conduct a ptibiic hearing on January 27, 201.5 at 6:00 p.m., oras soon thereafter as dee nxnner Ia.w be heard, at the City of Spokane Valley City Hall, 11707 Sast Sprague, Spokane Valley, 992'J6. City C.'.'nnci! CLtambers, to hear and consider the comments and testimony of those wishing to speak: at reit` ;sublic hearing regarding rata moratorium set forth in this Ordinance. Scetint] 5, put .tion. The moratorium set ltorth in this Ordinance shall In i:, date of this Ordinance and shall continue in effect for a period of 365 days from ted ! aL r l ilii Ordinance, unt ss repealed, extended, or modified by the City C'nr,neil after subsequent public tet is Esq and entry of appropriate iluditim of Fact, pursuant to RCW 220 and RC W 36.10A.390. Section 6, Ratification. Ar.y act c. n..i L:, ii wi :. ±L.: ant °nrio, ti t Forth `iercin ._nc :mu to the effective data of this Ordinance is hereby roti.i.a.2 Section' 7. any Seur,ii, sen rcitae, c .`LItis. Ord in:;n!'� s:i LI I: held to be invalid ar uncomstitutianal by a court of in.'<ii dit. or unconstitutiuila.ILty shaIl not affect the validity or aortsiii L:i •r li;k .rt ,u1} alter , rtit;IL, sc rti nL . clause, or phrase of this Ordinance:. Section S. S. Deckar'l,�rjon of Pi��__nc:1F F -.r i:tc.'�t' 1-}a:e. Ti.i,; i)idiivince is designated as a • public emergency necessary for the protection of public health, Safety, and S.•=If-are and therefore shalt take effect immediately upon adoption by the City Council, Passed by the City Council this 9111 day of December. 2014, A T V S t Dean rafos,, s vest .. 2 1 ,,l� r --City Clerk, hre u Ageistitiaai t Age ''-- Approved as Fo Office ()CI ie City - ttorr.ey Date o' Pith] ic, tion. Dec etuher 12. 7014 Effectivc Date: December 9, 21014 Ordinance I4-02.21 Page 5 cf J CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO.15,017 AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A (MORATORIUM ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF ALL NEW !MARIJUANA PRODUCERS, MARIJUANA PROCESSORS, mARtit 1.1N.,1. RETAILERS, MARIJUANA RESEARCHERS, ARCHERS, MARIJUANA �l' A'N. {z,4_.t. .5, D DELIVERY USES, AND MARIJUANA COOPERATIVES, LICENSED WI' OR REGISTEEREO WITH THE WASHINGTON STATE LIQUOR AND CANNABIS BOARD, AND OTHER. 1vEAT1EL S !RELATING TIIERETO. WFIEREAS, since 1970, fc:ki r'll Iaw has pithibitcd the manufacture and pJssessiert of marijuana as a Schedule I drug, based Olt the fcc.cr;cl I"54tH! Fl 's categorization of marijuana a$ (raving a "Iligll potential for abuse.. lack of !Aso. rtrd absence of any accepted safety for use in medically supervised Ircatrricnt. " .315 U.S. 1, 14 (2005), Ccilltla lied Substance Mt, $4 Slat. 1242, t L1.S.C. 80: c'. 'r^rt and W1-iE9tfe'4S-1[14iali}"_Mclsi.FL; No,G£r:..byOut vntersD1-t� a:di1I tonSt;u. _I, L:t'iiiibcr itis ,' , LY i, i .k l r +�[:l.l;tlllt°714':' •13tr�^.IIt S"f .�- I �Jt`a. • n':1 114�.f ��1ai;it'r 1l5 cL•�II_t::r G.,`` 1 . I C.1��, .� �cit�c tuY tlfirinatl.•c �i�.�rls� fol' - ti trJ t1Yt of :l1:!tt11i.'i UR; and V11ER..LAS+, in 2011, the Vt, I1iI1 LDr1 Stolle L:,;i_l3lalr ' Oi'iSi 3�rt :.I: i �Jti Wr; C:.55S=, 5;:'. 3 nc�ll, '.u1iJ'1-x �'_.Il1Lr tllll tL,tii i.1) 1111 tor i7i:il t11,C ir�;;lYtil:l.3 it Ilt'=: Ci! ®;rllioOis 'lis! ..!rs'I L::, Ilrl•1111 Lion li :itlt i;:l, t1 [t41 11['JC�4:i311g I�,i. !IitiI , ,11"; l'CCltl:ttO L.".11'r, t''r:r'v; l}illlvlll'1 clJ Ii:4,Ci5'ti Cti:rt Itril[ElV}cl[li::•TT 1111".rla:.r;4[li1 i'.}t tll''-'.fll_71Y:11 pr-.4'iJcrs, [3) 1 011.11:10; '.11-r;[:I';.' 1.:wy 111i'..'v. :')1 I:.;( iIt •:5'11h stL.l: kii tllCiI 0.0,11 115e_. allit yr. Cl:l It.Li [MI CA1C.S ':i[LIt'.II';tl,'I��.Ct lV C'l:[:t',Sli , rn LESv tllCIf Zr)Ili:]+g* ;aLlt:lority to rG�'.IIa[: undue} ESS'~ -t3 54") X11+1 chapter 'i4+ -51.k E.C1k' ,5'i,iiir tI . it r4 pecri r• ;tad 1', ; i lil'.f,.�' 1''i' rl if .'-[' 7'11 1. Flrrner ;11.131:[t. ;-1.: '•.'11't .t',1'ced the portions o �S SU ' :1.17 .:-1)1_Ifl 1'.'t'1. ! [: ; I:I'v:l 116: 1-^ I• ':rs ffi I' :i[i and licensing medical cannabis ill .I I)Itrc:tssiit faCill[l,y::.I!:i.1pr.I„tllcrCbyra.a!digthese activitiesillegal;and WI#L-IikuAS, tl 1111:,:16- a12, voters orth- %iccif 4'lusltington approved Initiative !c. 502 ("I-50211, now ,_:rrlitled in chapters 59,50, 46.04, rI6.20. 46.21, and. 46.6i ICewi;ctil c_'[;cik (l) dzrritninalixed possessinrt and use of certa41 rllllrtu4s 1_4 91Yc9rl�ll:Eu t:llt{I 11E1r11-I rl't j:::I':!13k'.'e'r�',:'li (.,.1 _iL[Ii_':".dedstate laws pertaining to driving under the ilt-liicln_c (if ic•t:' ,I L'II 1s lrr i11c111(1 4'-I l:lfi an11 ,Ile Influence of marijuana; and (3) established a cg1-Ildit::y sf lrl,, prac;t1';crs, pii,,:c.:-:'ra, ..lr.;l rt:r1llees of recreational marijuana for adults 21 hears .Fag Lnd ra.:Itrire.d Ole r: 1,.,ti_Itrt' Control Butird (nuw the Washington State Ligticr and L :Ilt;lail.� Itiir•a71, ;in:1 rel;err d tc:' 11': 1.:-1!1 [: I'ie '•'\1• SI.,CB") to ad:ipt procedures and criteria by December 1, 20.17.1 Lir licenses to produce, Irroc;:s3, -9r.r! c1I Inarijuar;i.: and W1-11.1,117, 15', cL : 1t«llat 2+7, 2013 lll'{17Lc;(.: gtlitlinr21 DTI I[Eikrljll 1118 i:iYlfl1C; 11' :1 I1LI[CL..IP.C11t I1,10r'1lC:S +1'!:1'C i]uLtlnL'il,, r11:31'I_11,i.lrtu L.] ;11.11L1i5_ .lril-�E`t- :Ill: memo of mi-ici_w1n i "11'@vl(li:r.4, SI cis, and (reel: ',LI54'aid .o :ll,.?Cvr.11-111i2tl:5 r trd in;I ,l. 1 SI site IJ lifted St',l1 S F).ir::frtir,entnf.Justice issued ,arnerno providing -.cat ill :t-o1rs'Y to chc J;._ilsptioii on -502. Several ongoing federal rtr.lutliti prk-01.1.0:1011 •ti:- crime and preventing distribution or In[t ' ill4d tl,<it t -x: I)u1Sa: Lrlti nt WOEi ld not seek ongoing prosecution that at.rl1c..rixed marijuana. provided that those scr"Irt. .,13CI •-fI':l lis'•`_ rcguil-E1L:Ly and enforcement systems that will Ptrac I of & ::lrltll' y5 tAc;li r2nL :'.1; ", t:li l t'.v amid Foie to public safety, public health, Land other law enforcement irttr reSt5. A ,tar: cic:`.rut.,. t{i thar rack most not contain robust crantrots nrrd procedures cr paper; it mast also be effscli,,c'. in luat:ri.f ;'. ,arid WL- E.1.11v City adopted Ordinance No, I.4-008, which established in cltamrer 19,85 of the :Spokane t:lley Municipal Code ("SVMC") and SVMC 19.120.050 rcgrrlat ons, wing, buffers, and oilier limitations on marijtta nn producers, proce55rais, and retail, sellers licensed under chapter 169.50 1.CW, but which did not .cgulatte unlicensed rrtarijttatta uses, including medical marijuana; and WHEREAS, the City's regu:attinns ;were premised, in part, upon the laws and regulations then in effect (chapter 69,50. RCW and chapter 314-5a WAC), that allocated a total of threw rnitrijuatta retail licenses within the City and provided a ttlaxitrturi limit on rnarijttana production space; and WHEREAS, on December 9, 201 'l, tale C;ty t dopa d Ordinance No. 14-02I , adopting a moratorium. on the establishment of new unlicensed rtririjuana usLs In order co allay!' the City to consider any mariju ana- related legislation adopted as part of :iti&: 2017 Viinitirtgton State Legislative Session and to detielop comprehensive marijuana rcguIaticxis incorporating iiC:i changes; and W1 -17.R E;AS, the. mwratnrium adopted by the C'iLy can December 9. 2014, did not impact exit licensed cr tinlicunsed ctarij.rana facilities and clyd net prohibit the City from processing ;tltplicttt:,.:rr : rnnrijnsrta p',rducers, processors, and retailers because the City had already adapted f-ar suck ., c;'l.r:r 'Cir prenrisexi, in part, upon the laws and regulations then in e'ffe'ct (chapter 69.`:t: rt.sl c1i:ir r,2 14-:5 \VAC), :hat alloeatcd a rata[ of three retail Iizenscs ;;'itltin the City and in:ixinrum limit on ;marijuana production space: and Wf'1'.Ccl?A5, to date, the City has 19 licensed marijuana producers, 21 'ic:crse.t pr, ccssor,.r.riii thr.'c 1irc,'s ;l ;r,;rrijt:ait:i retailers located within its boundaries. All tiirea lica::et i r,.i iru;:ir r::r;liler, ri:em rrpcn.ti•:te:al :AM at -C .sell.ng marijuana at their locations within tlic City. TL; I11v12 rciated to medical marijuana in 2013 rind 10 business registrations in -i . pri,,r act rlic adepiion of lite moratorium; and WHEREAS. in 2015, th.e Washington State Legislature adopted the 'Cannabis Patient Protection Act, ' Laws of 2015. eh, 70, ai :1 additional comprehensive marijuar.a-related regulations pursuant to Laws of2G15, cit, 4 and ,:t1it: _ 1a° .t4:i 1c ;idatimn(cDilvetivcly. the '2015 Marijunria Lc.7islatitvn"); and WHEREAS, Rs part of the 2015 Marijuana Legislation, the State (1) merle' led the medical and recrz:ttirtnal marijuana markets by establishing at "medical marijuana endorsement" roti[ retail licensees will be able to obtain to sell rnedicai marijuatna to qualified patients and designated providers, *bile also making unlicensed collective gardens illegal by July 1, 2016, (2) expanded the amount of niarij tram production that may be conducted siate-wide to accommodate the needs of marijuana retailers ‘' ith medical marijuana endorsements, (3) created "cooperatives" Which must be registered by the WSLCB, and (4) created a new liat:rlse for common carriers to deliver and transport marijuana between licensed marijuana producers, processors, and r'ctailcrs deliveryrtransport:ttion and created a Mex rat;rivatra research License for perrtiittcs to produce, process, and possess marijuana far certain Iimited resc:a.cli purposes; and WHEREAS, as part of the 2015 t tarijtnan7,r Legislnt:on. etre St,ite reiuir.2d an increase in the mmnl:cr ct il:utijuana retail licenses to 'accommodate tic medical needs cl e +iali';ire': paiiontS: and designated p:.oviticrs" and directed the WSLCB to protnt.1lgara: r.rlcs :end rc ;u.0!, .icr..s For of increased retaii IiccnSCS, accepting new retail license applications ,nes axuptiog for '.71cc!',cal rni;tijt,ana endorsements; and Drdinarrce 15-017 F'ar�y `` of ,IUL1;,Lr1 y on September 23, 2015, the WSLCB issued. , efectiue initttediuLdIy. it I l,',RQS la-l., 1. 4 1'JSLCR Emergency Rules") t4 amend chapter 314-55 WAC to prayidc t1.I ,';i1 1,11 •, : i•�',13 �'; i it i7v r1:1 11L:cepting Lnrtl'ijunna retail license applications c•n OctobL:r 12, 2015 mil it rill r;t.t r. 1iw11'.l On 111 11..1'111i1;:r of marijuana retail licenses Until Et filter date, (2) the WSLCB will begin n ca111[6r1 marijuana ericleisewerlts, and (3) the State cap on 111ilximu[il Ittilr'ljll�Ylly'L nL'='I II',ti_ n. S'S''t :1S i'• •llaL'r date; .uui 1 1 [;R1.:„r\S, on September 2.5, 2015, the WSLCL naso issued its Proposed Rides : 1 1 7 �.illcll 1 lc1 pttbIIC car ri-w•Ir, a[1C pursuant co w11ic11 theW.SUCB h;Ls provided that it '.Vial 1:17L set 1'i'.Irilber of-r;i[irijLl.L;l;l :k.i. 1:1 licenses or a Stat.. capon Marijuana production slliaa° ur111 .1 later da:L:i mai Va'1 'E':Itl ,'w` ,lt[Ir uiL'lt lo Art rc, 1, S .cri1]11 1 ..'thy- Wa:—.111ii :oii 1' }11�tI:llCl..1. lift' ivil'•' l` S;1rlk:ln', is 1111[;'.':11' ll1 "1111'tit .11'.i t::1ti)rC 41'1]11;] r[i 11[1111.7 al'. :3uwI1 IIi ,11 It1)16.'w, ~:1nII;L1 a[l,: Othei In: i11 a 1.r',IL '1 '.4llll , e.aeral laws." winch inci'.[dc5 the noopLk111 L4f :e'-jCl1[1+i(1 `,ri'CI'11111 _T w' I!1:t t.. •. 7 i.I:.Ar 36,7D .39%} 17r17'iwi[_ I.I I1 "r1. c.iiii'..t,,• or city o' . ,lin', I ud ilial adopt:, 1 ;1't}' I.,: ,i„IL .111J1II!1 ,,,,,a Llrlg map, 11X]'11 YC}[1iI ', i.IlEla2L1CC, :11” tli?llh't'i "I 1llihliw ii.::.l II.: La ..6'.ti proposed moratorium, illtcr:lll : '11111+ wan, i:1tcL`irlt zonini, tiir;Il :x11 4ir II't44'II:1 .i]7;L111lold a public hearing fin the acli[iN:111 LTIr 9aLorlllt1-. zn:11lg map., int i4ri .:-tiro: lcc, ;1I' int=rim a1tic control within at 11;[t,t ;i ,wC`1' :IL3'.'t 01" is irdoptinn, whether or not tlx: tgo...:r..1in iz body [ t .'6': L:;1 II ru':1omma'L1(Lation on tale Matter ft:oi1 the: l}It7r11r.11tti commission of Cli pa"tLr1_^:':. A. the govcriliinib.dv'ducs not adopt findings of facr_i,J!,-;r:1"yh 2 AS 3C11011 L`L:tore this lieiring. 1.1::r k7 1ti ±iL'.', cic tii 61n nediatEly after this public l"O ri 1 '4 it'(]l;rtoril1111, interi •. 1;1:iillg map, itllt',i 1. 'U11.1.11:_ or[1.11a[1CC, or i[li^1 i:11 r FCicial c' ntrOI adaptcd '.[rlL:. l :I Ltit`711 111 i!' be 'L'l1 (l' far POI '.01.2...;1' li•t' SL . 1711:-.7:111<, hu 11:a', bc. effective f01' up to one yo;1'' 111;11-. i .:L:: 'd Cioperl Ir}{' le l:'.ic 1 tillC.l a la?ILt eI 11t•.i4'1.1 A moratoriums, interim "!-•.r`i:1!', in:111, i; llt:l:,r. zrrnin nr':11n111.Ci or 'cowl! 21 [1:113. [:.ti 1'G:11evM1:1 Rif one rd. tiior .1 It i.d :711d IIlict are made prior to :....tr:'' WHEREAS, d meratarturn cna.cleL1 undo: 35A.67;:„1-111. and/or RCW isi.; {Jra = 71 ;4 ;1 Ir14>tIi 1 by wllicb local governments may preserve the Strlt ell; } li':.".t new plans arid regulations Will Ii.JI LIE" rendered moot by intervening development; and WHEREAS, RCW '71,1_(') arid RC'W 35.70A.3911 both uil,r: i r'v '111 .eridetermLt of a nli1i'It.1riLILr• (Hitt:riL1 ].'.I##111; 111111, IlitGrL'11 1:I' I:1r. Li11 ti�l:IGI[.1 control 1?n?: 1,] ,r+)Iil!L: a public hearing; and WHEREAS, pllrsuarlt ! ti'.l 197-11-1fic1, the ldopticrr `'I this Crilli14inee is enempt from the reduiri nlLInn of a iiirewlic1d (EOt4`111:LIl1ticlI unite. iI 1::'le 1".Ilti lrilrl',11L:;1•.aI C"<)4'4 ti' Act: anti ✓dF.61t[;'`'1 1 •I1,1, 161 Citi' is ire I.11c sill:cs.r 14. rl ,cdr11-1in, a7llr3'.:n;lt ',.L [�' i If'iL144:4,' � R VO1t17rRI`.L' 1': 14'4'. !L14c11(: ,! '1'10,1 4i'.I-t atio11x1 1113E Ij C,I;hl 1"L L.13t41;:P;. 1"111 .V1:4'L'L': 1;10 1I;il lllln -•]1111111 LS I[?n ar.i^ Cil 'Council +."L11 not Heave X14 L' J [tLlll[ly rO folly consider and tlei.2101) euisiprel!C[L'ai','L: lit..:l1ii.'n:i dee i ri LI1LLL :r„ c. i1 LlL'LiL1:ltu Co11`.i .-..atl£1!1 t'J .' 01 ? '.;[i#}lIIl1`e:l Lt+_[ I: il(1'1, o1' Fl? adopt EIIGI: I. i y I _L1J1:LtL311�, prior LoCketobcr '?0115 When 11W iC &.:1'i 111 q'e 6[1:stCeolii ? [[n ! i:I"Oct'1 in ;r[1.l11L[1Il:5, 1i i :L; 11::;1:1 L1 it ii ketoses; aiul 11EREAS , re>,v proposals ta'r add ili'. r:. I 1i rases that int$• 3111mitind beginning October 12,=0'l]_. pose Ail ir11L11inCnt [.L:e_::1'. L;:• lam: i:•LI:}lig: rt';11. , : !L1 -.11•[_:0:.' 1S Ilty} May l:L'4lIt:: ir-cornpntib-le Ianci uses st.hjent to file City's C`iistil, _ l'-.:ta! :I Lti..r117:. 1 l 11 .:r 1:.'N[r;I ; 1, Irl part, ULi aiotas of Ordinance 15-017 Page 3 oft three marijuana retai I stCL:.S and a 5to.1'c cup on tl►r. ma:jinniil amount of nwri j valla produ Gl ion space, '''i[bout allowing the Citi: to Billy consider the impacts of the 20 i`-':.rilt:.Lria Leg,islatirlil or the VWSLCI3. Erma -gooey Rules. Further, ttllowi►lt an tInkLtown number of 1131 uldWir. retail Iicet7al:s to vest ol! b bleated within the City prior to completion of the City's review and 33cve1oppinc:1tt of its marijuana zening and land 1151 p„2,-ulatici>I►s impairs the City's ability 1;_1) Lo sivefllll cei1SiclEra::'1'. rile 2015 Ii•larijutrnn Legislation, WSLCB Emergency Rules, ,illi" current!}' uncapped incre:I c. n nxti'ijuana retail stares tmd statewide 17naxilnuim marijuana prL dLlwli',:Irl spnoc, (7) tr. develop a : oiLs,.,n,'i ;L;)proar:li Lu the pltblic health, safety, and well'ilrc impacts from the ".til N•li:ijl,rami :1..`;L+::3 lmergettey Rules, and the uncapped increase in the n1iiflI ci c,1 ,t►r:;LrL,r:.: r_t.;il s ttii— a,;,ai .:t_wide maximum marijuana ;)r. 1,1c,i• qi spuicc, ,iiid (3) to adopt app`-C'pria: c;:-'.71)rrI,'liSik"'' 1.::gtilations goyerI1in'_, Il'x.riit ill ;wid %creational marijuana based upon /11 2. 21111', ijrlana Legislation and L,rnergency Rules; And i1V •1 t 1 , acktiti''ci; I1 I1. i- 17C.'.]'l:•'IIt C,7r f LlE .:..,-in5ideration t0 117,-_, 2111 7 'w': t .I,I Y:I:I I S'.'CI'+:c1S in innal't,]Rlltnil LL::i •.i4.r..•; etlt. "ills .,'r la: 'It;'.'+ dzoncd apprt}tich to the 13-: 71i, it allii ,:' f 1 .1 '. tir,;SL(.B En1'irQ rlcy Rules, and the oil!.r'°11?ka, ,llir_-ir; 'l; n.1-;t:,ll`�ti'{[;IE' tl'llltill11W1111 In,!rl Ilh;Lr1:7 1 Y:t hI,L:I r15 rc �,LIIatic i ':' 17'1,7':: n1t:11+:,r1 .sl i I' 21)1.f., 1.:.11 -,1 :'i:.', aii•.,rI'In,l V' 1_'. I� I`.1"u: .'• .. 1' I'I',I r'• LL .I1. ii';L, I.1 i, ':I I:: [I. I.1. CIt'': :.I'a Eli:, I L,) :ti I ii) ° J i9 o:7,I1C l'I�,nli nt, C-=)rn lissiou and City Counc I( ) tc t* we ti .0-13 I°iner'i,:Iicy RUI1Cs1 and currently Li; .11►i'scd .I'r Ptlli i11ariju;:�l:: p7rodttctian1 sp;I tee. (?) tc develop a ! "' t: II[l j ;ll.i'a ;rum the ICI I ?3i'tj'_I,Ln'i'. 1,�e1itil.11inril •:1L,11L;: I`i the number of 11 L]_l.tr1<) I'•;l,!il 34tti1'}5 p.1):.10) tL i741tii9'•: '1ppri;nri:lrt: t_[ t1!IiI:'11+._:igl' e. ;' :111.'1 lir,riiu 1rLu lltt5 it t[1'•tl11 clic iia r,L.l:, li; ,t1 Lllt �tC'kV 35..63.22'),7sal R12W:l6.7D....i9C►.;lllt'1vL'i C5 ia[lllcis W pubIIC heariI14 on the 177'1::atr'rLLrrl7 1.1.2. _',':, l'rL .:.t '' ..::L: l.1 _ ,I::It, r,l .! r,' )1 _itrirfUnl concc.min'the a ,rrl.il is11niertr and nir ,11 -II ,... _. :L :1' t" and 4'41r;'ll:tl1 II11:3171iCC1 `,Ir: r•.',r: , I [1' :1'1111 rl 17 a1 F' . Y. iatl'C .LL a..,. -'. ..._ ni;L':ii ii!n'1 171. IIIGlIIa p7riiilrt:7t''111 7r):1Ce .c -1L I!IL)l) 11 .'Ii'7r;]acl1 :':' 1.11•- 1„1-hll.' I•_'.. III'. `;.:i :l :1 '-`'-:k1: l'4 II:1;);1CLy [R•Ci tilt' y! i i` 1'.Slpl :!17."". .LULSIittl�ll. ' f - L1P., :cri [[IL'I'vai3i, u. lli+_ nu: ".l•c :it it ,1,.j'.t_l:r�.. r._:::il 31;y•.r +, �1 � 1 I r1r:: � ;5',� , ..~<, :; !.I Li.: Lll � I. l :,1: iiiihpt ;IISliCt:!71"lolls:-:,'LtIli7rci :n L.': r"' i Illi z11:11{l IaP!'I'11f1 1.1:-;11 1:::1 -I 1 C1: 1br15{:c; L[1H1 L:•2 nil, R.( • t)c ivic rjn:ini701 aric 4�i 4 'Its .I`."•.il It }.IL `;E_ii. - 17-}r.51.)-1 $191] 15111 1 •.'.1.sii(l dlg'.'Lt5 contra!). to ..irl4: LLiLs=•i11:irk:rl LYlll1 any IC.. isi.1[1S 11." L i;:y :;1:1" :, 1i. Iu'.' its I tiI s 111 C1 (l:_L'UI,$t.t?115: ,i7(l -.1)e tit',' C'r:unc.iI 5:1'.I this Orclln:t[ice i. Ii:scessary for the Mt l;reservilticn aI't 10 plibkir health, I?t f}ii sr, anti p iiblis -1-1117..7Z 1:'z I,,,y .I, r. the Cry I.`co.nc.n...: l nrr1;,'r .s as Follows: :.-7',211A 1 1• Prciirnirmry Fir7,_lin2,5. The ac,..4ts the above re ilals as 1Li:i.irid4 Gr': ti'.C_ 1), _lLl"1'p Set".'rGrl 2, iLi.y1 1L : iutr: f SLal)l,i`tlled- 1 I1:: Cic ,"_'Durres I a moratorium tLpDn the submission, C1I' a171:,,,v1I ,1rL': jar::"L')'t :°p1136114L c1[15 or licenses by or FO_' any rtew i1.':71x1 .-- Pagel of6 i . For purposes or- ibis moratorium, 'licensed or registered Marijuana use" 1tLealls .'Yljy tmiAt'ijtu n ! producL:rs, [lryrtrciu;+1lil processors, marijuana re'ailers, including itRy Iiermsed retailer seeking of medical marijuana endorsement, rtt,arr .serrchcr, marijuana delivery or transportation by common CUL'rier between licensed Facilities, inarijuctia cooperative, ur other use that is required pursuant to chapters 69.50 and 69.5IA RCN and chapter 3 L4-55 WAC to be licensed by or registered with the WSLCR. C, This moratorium shall not affect, and "licensed or registered marijuana use'' shall not include may petSC•nal possession or use 'of- marijuana, niarijLtana-illfu$ed products, n1Llri;,ua L ?';irc'1cts,, marijuana concentrates, marijuana oils, or vtl;er Farm of product containing or derived from marijuana and intended For human use b;, any peLson pursuant to chapter 69.5G (CWN or by any cluaLfyhlg rlaticnt or designated provider pursuant to chapter 69.51, RCW. D. Nnd.11?. i;cl. in Shari ;Ll:cct Llle processing or consideration of any existing and already - submitted ccirnplete lari {•Ll '. Ii1 �!I : I"',,iL ,eplaiicntions that may be Aibjeci to vested rights tis lIl'oviticd under \Vaskiington law, or :._l, I.I;+_';:t.. oc consideration o!• any land -toe or building llzr[T it for a rriarijuaft,`l producer, nlar114 :r.:;, j i'=:.{: I' I'..:'-' IJ ]1311 retniik i— that has, as of the date of this moratorium. already received its limns:. t'r.7111 die :`' _ _ ; ;n:(: 'avlliCll permit application is lora modipiL.antioa or renewal ;1t the ex:stinc, location listed on itizt I;c'.:LI ;'.; Ior tliat.l;lda':juana producer, processor, or retailer. RL'L'tllltl. 3. 4'a�(•.:' 1'r!It. 1IY','. 10i11,` iug okooik 1)1an IS adopted t!7 iLC;;all-'v Lhc is:•;.:iti::`. illiI} s'In ie L.1„t'v's ['c U1a:Li11 r1 ::•F ;1.1L1 of licensed or registered marijuana uses: Valley Planning OQtnmissiOII is hereby aittllnri'r._'d [old YiirCct: ! s:} IC ?ri] ::i11? I.; I'.:' ILL Is!i: ,.•s 0. .'..'1'a ' '. } ir.Lly receive and consider st,'7Li".I tl'"s. -..1:11'1 l.S• `Ills. I'r:'Ia'.I' to the public nealgh, safety, anti ..'C.:fl[-', i al:LCL 9_ The City of' Sll.i'.ane Valley Planlning, Commission is hereby autl.t r;�._.i _ s .li'::•_L . Lite city. I: L i tlr City, as 1 :1s all public input :tiL t i L:rl 7L1 r. +.'c,• l' , r,^pC) II lit I4'!r11'Lr11d'.3 l}LrLainirIC to lite CSI:1.7iislial. t of 1ic<nsed. or re'1sts1'%:e1 17.=1[;1Llt1'i 1 giving full ;;i}11 1cler'1CIC+r. to ell: 701'1 r.,1;':i.i1tiU['r. and ‘V.-;.1.17_13. I11L:C�_l'-Ir:i' 1.1;1 . ;LL'.:: l�.'1kL(:,l feGul ticliy prOVHs2 ' 1L•C't`il7['an4 `.'I: Ir'” 1'f Y:,1161.t1.fl: ,1 SL: lrpJ ;v.L['tj LI ati 1 Lel'UrLIlYI;:Itl.C'L (0 LhL (_I['• ti74-11'::I1 rat' ILS cC iSLCIeratiO11. Section 4. PuLl,i:,_Iill:aein Pur3Lrut t: I r\ iA.6 2?fl and 36.70A 3Q11, the City Council shad; conductpublic hearing cit October 27,201 j.t I rti ls. I :l.': Il t11L :II altcrmay rC hoard, .:1.1 the City of Srinkane Valley City 1-lall, t I tr. l ,L L:' +', li I.:llt•. 'k L Chambers, to hear and consider the CCMIlients ar,.: bc.-L ol .:'l:';K •';i,l:ll::' L(. s11��L ,1[ sucE, :}L:lalic hearing regarding ilie moratorium set forth in this t_tl4:1111J 1'..o. Section 5. Duration. The moratorium set i ilh in this 1..'I ,linolire ;4;1::1' tie in eff.:ct ,tsof the date ef this Ordinance and shall continue i[1 ;:11441 Ile•Y!orl of '56' +: l'1 4 11'C111; I'Ii.2 L i;LL Cil Ci:lti L ;YIii11ncr'. unless repealed, extendt.:(1., cl' rr:r,ef fled by the; Cty"::; L,n i1 3i- r > .l 5r ''u n ;nitIlit: Ila::lr'iitg(5) and s;1rtl'y of apprupria,te findings of fact, pt.r. uant t4 RCW i5.\.5 ._A.:II and (,!.i.:V,/ 1.'..70.A..3'.14.1. Section 6. Ciasitiistellt '.■•It t rriti .:11111. LLQ �:t r L:I'::a a, 11 _'.ill" to t:lC effective date of this Ordinance is 11QL',21.1}' i.iti I iL'1.' and afiiri;u.t.i. Section r,�".--'I':17illt�' rf ;LI'. ` S' llti n, 'LiiLL:LlLL;, L: LO,I. i7 t' I711E:'. :- ;i i,1iy :'.'rein YI' C sha11 be or I111,.:•:yWli[.'l_f+1":11 by a court of L'!`7'11p,aet11 juriSdicti13II, such 1nvNlidity or LL L- II'a.l',.Li+'I::LIIC': `"11:'..11 rl+'d .i1'-','1 11r+. '-' 0, C1, i�tL!i.t1a�L1:111Lb' 1]I ;;r:•` U'lu:r section, `.a',I1t:::1C . ausn, or p:1171'7C (1.111 :S Ordinance 15-017 Page 5 or 6 Section 8, r •Irive Dare. 'fhis Ordinance k dusiviated public etywrgeoey 1teec53m-yIL t' l:•Ib1LI'...`d11111'::1.'.1;_iy, and ,,velfare and therefore silts!! tilt- eflea iminediaely upon ado.--,tien !Alit:. 1. Passed by rite City Council this 60 day of October, 2015. Dean Guafos. Mayor ATTEW Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk ell Approved as to rinrrn: Office pf the City Attorney 4 36 76— liate of Publication: Effective Date: October 6, NI 5 Ordinance 15-017 Flt.ge 6 of- b CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE 1.O. 15-023 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SVOI(ANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ADOPTING THE RENEWAL AND EXTENSION OF THE MORATORIUM ON ALL UNLICENSED MARIJUANA USES, ORIGINALLY ESTABLISHED PURSUANT TO ORD ANCE NO. 11-0211 FOR A PERIOD OF SIX MEONTHS, AND ADOPTING FINDINGS OF TACT JtJSTtFYUNG TME RENEWAL AND EXTENSION OF TEE MORATORIUM ON UNLICENSED iVIA IJIJANA USES, AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING NG TI'IEI ETO. WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 11, Section 11 of the Washington Constitution, the City of Spokane: Valley is authorized ro "make and enforce within its limits all stuch local police, sanitary and Della regulations as aro not in conflict with general laws," which includes the adoption of rezulations governing Land uses within the City; and WHHEREAS, RCW 315.7QA.390. provides that "A county or city governing body that aalpts a moratorium, intsritn zoning map, interim zoning ordinance, ar interim cfliicini control without i c:Iding a public hearing on the proposed moratorium, interim euuinf man, interim A.:n.ing, 4>rdinr,rl[:c, [r iut ri1-1 official control, shall hold a public hearing, on the adopted moratorir:rii. :;ut;';tl r':irun r-onin,g ordinance, or interim official control within at least sixty days n ii t5;i:[i u1.. �.'I,� tri r , :' Il;ft t ,c governing body received a recommendation on :itc matter from the l.iI iii i r1.' ::ti 1.i :lis Ion it err a tm n:. if the governing body does not adopt find'incs of fact justifying i;i action I r hearing. then t: governing body shall do so immediately uftcr this puLrlic hearing. A r:,:•pr a..viiini ,i _cr;1„ 1+:iii!1 ,:loll:. interim zoning ordinance, or interim official cortrral adopted, under I,,,, , he; ctl`Lc.i 4 `. +- 1:r I longer than Six 1Tlontlis, but may be effective fcr Lip to nn' year if a wo1"V Ir'ir stud ie; pr'oviriin,, such a longer period. A. moratorium, iltt-'1i.11 -ronin irtterina Oficial control may be rc:icvred tbi cine or mor! : i`: n r:r.t 1 .._ric.. l'[ it ,. it1A,' • 1'1C 11 lri i� Beed and findings of fact ore made prior to =oh renewal;" WHEREAS, a moratorium emoted under REV; 3 ;A.L3.220 arrtfI:r RCW 3-6 by wIi ch local ;overnrnenrs may preserve the status quo so that rle'4' I,];,1.,•; : tu.l 1 ulruitlrl:i ,k.il not be rendered moot by interw Laing development; and WHEREAS, RCW 5,"i 'i �0 and RCI,' 36. �1: /..,39ir _, ,ell 111°'',orife ren ';."al of a n1Oritrlriiirn, i.ritr::rim zon..n14 ;Imp, interim zoriir'.g ordinance. Or' interim Oftkii.'_l contr'1l tilt month periods it :l ptil,Ilu ; ;:::I'In " i:, I':1='c and findings of fact arc rn:!dL prior to c,rc1; rc'i''r."r..I . Aro:. WHEREAS, pur 311t to RCW 35.A.63.220 and Rl:W ii.7QA.394, on .doptcd Ordinanc'r No, 1''-02V c.;lallli.hirig a I orat•JriLil i upon the Su]I:liLw5i{}u, iitxvl]i,rllls. ,16:•-,.,;1.;L :_ ln�:�,,:lti';n=',';11.�frrc:-uaL of at -:y pi rll1it :!Illpli4iLic'l13:Ji '.E.:et1SeS by kir for urili,ci:ns�ti marijuana 1:i r;,i.ir1t to Section 5 of the. moratorium shall rclirairr i[1 Clia,:YCouncil [a.:,'i:'�dl ,"k '{"'i :1:I�r, front :' I Is, .:1.':: �.",j. :111 Ii:, 1'C ..s1ed exti t{I3d. yr rnodifi d Cit, ;alter si i :;" ,r`11t l I!l7li Il t1 'ttij ; n:: .inLr_.• (:1 ]pproprl:ltc findings of Tacit, pursuant to 'hr 35A.i 3.2?W and ftC:1V '? I-IFRE✓AS. I 1C"',. - _ !' ::..3:. ati: ti:r . , "rl.1 ' +1M .,.I d:,'.'c,i 1: r I fl ?r} 11'. city 'I'v.;a i. i,. r, Call cel candtLoWlCCI ti' ,Neil'.' Il `:.rll'i!'. .1w L;'..: I1lm,:II lii[.J .';xk'I.;ii?r. 1:71, ; I: ll }'iI11Yr i,il 1r1111Cti;tSt'�I IT1 i11.11.1;1':1 r"=4`;, :',I. ;[:rt 1.1.%Ie.lrrar:,,ilc. ]I »... If: fi 1.'I ] :±d r:1.:°; ink:1 atlll Ordinance 15-0'23 WHEREAS, City Camel' l heard testimony horn two interested ad.rries during the public (tearing; and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35A,G3.220 and RCW 36.70A,390, the City Council is required to adopt findings of fact attar conducting the ;public hea-ing and prior to renewing he moratorium. NOW, THE( EFORL, tltie R: ity Council ofthe City of Spokane Valley ordains as follows: Section 1. Findings of `act. Pursuant to RCW 35A.63.22O, RCW 36.70k,390, and Section 5 oVOrdinancc No. 14.021, on 'November 10, 2015, the City Council conducted a public hearing on talc renewal and extension of the moratorium on unlicensed marijuana uses_ originally established pursuant to Ordinance I'Ia. 14-1J21, Far a period of six months. The City Council hereby adopts the fallowing, as findings cf fact in support of the renewal and extension of the moratorium. on unlicensed marijuana in3t:s, orig,inally esa=iblished pursuant to 4.diniince No. 14-621, for a period of six months: Since 197fl, Cederal law has prohibited the mantrfaeture and pi ssessicn of marijuana as a Schedule 1 drug, based on the leder'agovernment's categorization of marijuana as having a "114 01 potential for abuse, tack of any acccpred medical Ilse, and absence of any accepted safety for use in medically supervised treatment," Ceramics 1.. Rehear, 545 U.S. 1,14 (2005); Ccrntrollecl Substance Act, 24 Stat, 1242, 2 L U.S.C_ 201 e! seq. 2. liiitia[ibt' Measure 69 , appro' cd i, tate rltt.'s of ',i.`.u.lt'.n.+-'ren St:stc on Nokvx:;trr 3, 1992, and now codified as chapter. 69.51A R .W. enol., 33 affi'i;x -li•.'. rlc-cuse I:ur "rlrl:]Iil'y`i]i l�r.-ieiti,s to the charge oIFpossession of malt mina_ 3. In 2011, the Washington State LC#,i,l i:.,C° cu,tsiik• d ;Incl passed *rSSSE SC72 that, :unot,g other things, (1) authorized tate licensing sof rri1lk,]1 .. JF1 r.]l,ws orodu trort 1r:cit_rir aril processing facilities; (2] permitted qualifying pat:er,is t{', receive eerrain +ir1711ntr; of IF ir'11'ti177 ler medicinal purposes from ccsigntatcd providers, .; j IIS .itutr,rl colloid t,'lrtile,ts Lw' grr]I ryi t_. whereby they may, consistent with state law, ttsllrci]...I1 _'`r;: .t."ii moat I_,, l7 it 1};wn .r 'And : 1 thrilled that Cities were authorized Lo continue t.r t:r.c ?hal."Ltitlii, ;]clr.-+]']ry to r < u1 :;t: rltfj prouessrnu, or dispensing of marijuana under ESSSB _'it}� °• •:(real 4'li 1:r4r 69 51A I`.e_ '". respective jurisdictions. 4. On April 29, 2011, former governor Christine Gregoire vetoed Mc portions or );S'::.!li i That would have provided the: legal basis for legalizing and licensing medical cannabis processing facilities, and production Facilities, thereby making thus: activities illegal. 5, On November 6, 24)12, voters of the State: of Wrtsltington approved initiative 1%.1e.;stin:.'112o. 502 N-5112"), now codified in chanters 69.50; 46.04, 45.20, 46.21, and 461.61 Revised Code of ;ii:iiii .:.,r ("RCW"), which provisions (i j decriminalized possession and use of certain amounts of marijuana and tiarijuana paraphernalia, (2) amended state Iays pertaining to driving under the influence of int .is ant5 to include driving r:nder t:ie influence. of marijuana; and (3) established a regulator)• s}•s«:n li �usina producers, processo-s, and rciaileis cif recreational marijuana for adults 2.1 years . f tit' tirtc? r cv:r_ r l required the Vitashington State Lic,uor Control Board (now the Washington Liquor .inti Cattrr.ibis•:,, r :I and hereinafter referred to as the "WSL.Cfl"j to adopt procedures and criteria by December 2013 fcr issuing license; to produce, process, and sot! marijuana. 6. On August 2r3, 2013. the: United States Department of Justice issued a mento previdine updated guidance on marijuana enforcement ent in response lc the adoption of 1-502. Several ongoistg Federal enforcement priorities were outlined, including prevention of crime and preventing disiu ibutivn of marijuana to minors. Further, the memo provided that the Department would not seek ongoing prosecution or: marijuana providers. users, and local of iiwials in states that authorized marijuana, provided 12R inriitice 15-11F : Page 2 of 6 that those state and local governments "implement strong and effective regulatory and enforcement systems that will address the threat those: state: laws could pose to public safety, public health. and ether law enforcement interests. A system adequate to Erni: task must not only contain robust controls and procedures on paper; it must also be ercativc in practice." 7. On July 22, 2014, the City adopted Ordirttiriec No. 14-008, which established in chapter 19.55 of Rite. Spokane' alley Municipal Code ("SVIv1C") artd SVMC 19.120.050 regulations, zoning, buffers, ,anti ether limitations on rnarijuana producers, processors, and retail sellers licensed under chapter 69.51 RCW, but which did not regulate urrlicerrscd marijuana uses. S. Unlike recreational licensed marijuana production, processing and retail sales minder chapter 54.5[1 1.0 V, all other marijuana uses, including medical marijuana and businescs offering ''private' rt>,arijtiana consumption e7r "vapirig," remained unlicensed ruurijuau:r uses that were lamely unregulated and were not subject to review, licensing, or enforcement by the WSLCB or other State or laical agency. 9, The City believed ,he Washington State Legislature was likely to propose and consider legislation on medical marijuana in ILLS 2015 Legislative session, but the Citycould not determine what that legislation may have provided or tivl•:cther it would in fact be passed. 10. As !A-October'Jt, :� i 1. I:r: C'i1p had processed business registration endorsements for at least LS medical-marijuan, within the City, all of which provide niarijiiana ectside of the licensing, regulation.WSLCB, noire of which were or are licensed marijuana producers, processors, chapter 69.50 P.CW, and none of which were or are subject to the City's regulatiorti; I 'J.!:-.!3, or SVMC 19.120.050. 11. On DeeernL'::l `.::!; k City ackapted Ordinance No. I4-02 1, adapting a moratorium ori the establishment of new kin licoirsr:d r°.r ri liana uses in artier to allow the City to consider any marijuana - related legislation adapted as put i t CI:. 211I5 Washington State Legislative Session and to develop comprehensive Ina rijuana gulttions ::rw..Q, rttirigsuch changes, 12. The moratorium adopted by the City on December 9, 2014, did riot impact uxisti:t•4 I.�a.rs4-1 yr unlicensed marijuana facilities and did not prohibit time City from processing a151i1ication's rclt�[ccl l licensed marijuana producers, p':ocessors, and retailers because the City hind a1r4,.trJy adopted ru:;ul,iticins fol- such uses that were premised, in part, upon the Lau" ,•incl rc iilatinns tl•:e:1 iii eflcer (ctinl: �r iia'_ RCW and chapter 314-55 WAC), that allocated a total of three retail Beer . cs {.'.ty :,r:rl lirnvicti:C. a rnaxiniurm li niton marijuana production space. l3. Pursuant to Section 3 of Ordinance No. 14-02.1, the Cir•_,' of clic .: ric ': ',Ic I'lU:trsritg Commission was directed to cnttduct prul}lic Ticar: igs and public riteetiii:is to ec,asidcr die uupacrs i unlicensed marijuana uses, arid) to work wit'. City stai`T and citizens of the City to develop proposals fur regulations perIairilag co the establishment of unlicensed marijuana t*.es, which regulations may include provisions restricting or limiting unlicensed marijuana rise up to and including burns, to be Forwarded to the City Council for its consideration. 14. The 2015 Washington Stat: Legislative session bun on January 12, 20 L5, and was extended through a third special session that concluded on July 10, 2015. 15. [n 2015, the Washington State Legislature adopted the 'Cannabis Patient Priorection Act;' Laws of 2015, ch. 70. and additional comprehensive inaryuana-related regulations pursuant to LAWN of 2015, on. 4 and other enacted legislation (collectively, the "2015 Marijuana 1-egislalion"). /6. As part of the 2015 Marijuana Legislation, the Slate (L) reconciled the medical and recreational marijuana markets by establishing a 'medical marijuana endorsement.• that retail licensees- Ordinance icensees Ordinance I5-423 I 3 old will be able to obtain to set', medical marijuana to qutl]ihed patients and designated providers, whilc also making unlicensed co11ici-Rive gardens illegal by July 1, 2.016, (2) expanded the amount of marijuana production that may be conducted state-wide to accommodate the deeds of marijuana re -la c:1.s with tliCdical marijuana endorsements. (3) created °cooperrtives" which must be registered by tiro WSLCB, ;and (4) created a new license Petr common caltricrs to dc:IivL;r and 11`tin5port marijuana between licensed marijuana producers, processors, and retailers d'elively/iiwtsportation, and creEed rL :lett' maa''juana rose1L'Gh license for p'ernrllees to ptLlduCe, priaces,s, ,and I}ossass marijuana for ccraii: 11r1:ts'C1 rt:suacch purposes. 17. ,A p;Lrt or ri[G 7.015 M rijtIana L vis]atictn• the State required an increase in the iiont ic7 c•f lnari,j1111:1a 1 l,'_1. IL+. iI:•'v s '.._i t:`,.:.SaYllli'�IIICI'. tI1l medical needs of qualifying patients and L]C tfi,tlmc:d a:aC p on ilgate rules rir}ri regulations for 5eltirl4 the ii i 1bol c f ttL;••1' ';ul)lic;Llions a .d accepting applt"cMions for medical I111I-I'u:t:1i! Iicl•.y1'x+vrlr�ItC.S. ij, is+[; `ic:k:•t"It .l7L'r 23, 201S_ lilt: LI;CCiivc irnrztediutely, Rtllet' 1 ` i11.2 111 31.1tv11d cliG:pi.Li 314- - 1 .r}'L ' is provide Cllr (1) th:: 7�i Lir; LIc 1. 1>1:11,. nrLrs rI=Lra"rctail icc:7s4 ;al1p i7;r:•ns cn [,''•:1clbcr 12, 2015, with the limit. an Ili Taber ii -111 ii'411:7 '7'I:II lti•:I: 1' tie so. at (2: Illi: 1W'SLCR to begin accepting applic::i1111r5 for il'�rllv;]I ri.lSlrilt:r-n_l •_;:ti.•[_.'Irll:lit}, tLilsi (1) 1112 y:I:I1:: vat, .7)II L1l:: 111rCu1I n1arijLl011a production spiw,tt'r i'1r_I L:,L4ti ,1 [i. a i ;.,.111i?'=S1}t !,1)rI'ile- 1 i. .ji71 .:' ItrcirLt r 23, 21.11,, '.y7.ry L1 51..:.'13 abet sslle;d its Prnpc�;i-u I?. r ' s ; I •ti'II 11. 'L:c: :.ill ;�:.r 11IhI.0 con- w..w. :1d :r'I7'=.1... :i ,7L'Uri",;I + 1:'1,1':'li!rrCl ill; -1 tlti: 11ll;l ,.'n I:I ili.11tl+;I +.I aar'CJ'.I:1G' 0::171 LCCrisej all:. :,! 'a , ;,17011 nia"ljk.rl.'al L' I.CII l'. space .', lI. !f•: ;el ;7.: I'II::1 :__B Emergency Roles, and Itl 1,I1.:tr to, LttlL: :':'I} 111:: staff iS illi I!:aw tit -1 't'I:11lie 201 i M ri a:11,l I;.v.al,;4 :I., WSIJ(. I? I'la.r r. n1:,' kink :•, I r 1• v I.Lk; '�r�ltsid•:r , to -1 ' 11:.s, and rrL'ir ll..l.'rl1.i 'I_".%1. -.'..ti •'IL,`' 1711!1I;!I!.11;1 prCdil'vI+il'. :4:14:2, i2 ngt15It• !}t5;.1 - :I .1,ICI l:'l': 11131'..I.r•; ;t.mr the 11!,5 1V.at°ilildltla L i . al L. ''`L.i'It e I i s'l1.-.'!.; ll:' q„: -.1!--,r1 ru :. , r1'J ',Lc 11 l4clir.kat rltcr•,crs❑ iri rumijliJLla il[el 41ti':i'fi' -k`::�11 :llI(1 1-! ,11;•1:' r 7l'I;a[:..:LrI' Curl}p1t2I1rn avL 1:00ing awl, land IIS„ •1'; '1 �l!'I{ �i�l'+;r-�.1"i IIIt.CICs -? D. ::r 1:1+:l:--: tI i"i l'1 :11e 21) 15 I: -i -1• I2 -I 1 -,ial. li ;r 4 `.�1.+� [� 1_.11 �:r Pl'.•�: i '' _ S. ,. }�; t�Jtil, f'I I -r --,til I .11 ,::: +!4;r .. iV r= 1tabklSllcd i new tic{ , =i t or re4.sti-e(.1, usL:s on () . ob[;r 67 +1 Nu. :.5-017. 21. , ltktouph t1rc: City 1.,F; H:_511Ia rh work 171a1ns _:-iL;:hl1::I1ld ill i::ldli! irrw° 'I,i I'1-07.1 ;Loci is lite; tice No, 15-11',',+`tl l�� lLlllil.1 t ; :nlniaaic7:t aft.; +,_:ily i`trllrcii ti ill rtra: 113'02 ;:t1 ;:l 'ull :l'L-i4!:'.. 117 C! !L4'v»]•;,1 ..CI11:,.`_'ll,.lt`.I' r Irl.arijualt;f policy „1. C 1iLC11[ ilti;t 6 -cc; ;ICILg1lc'7.Z Grins°i1,:raii u to 2015 \':,1•1111'tr:i• '1'hlr;ttioc: :1ior 711 tir.trrtirraticin LI3ratLL'itr 411 0:111C•,:117:'\l. Lrl riiII,ILi !'".IL- ial•11'i,lt..i;-ralnu;1I1 Lc CIr{:1:1[1ncr.: 7`,o. 14-0+21 11,1,0.`5 5l:ch nitiarir:'.`.'IIlI1ri is r•�:;•s'.°. eJ and >-1 :tctCCl 1='r lj Si ❑.I_+Ittl7 ;trrica[1. 22- Pursuant to Article 11, Section 11 [1f lite Vlrasilin 117rt i:nns`tku,i}:1n, the Ci:'a L( Spokane. V..[ILV 1S .111111nr17_CC1 10 r-M.Y.';4 . II+.f LrT•:.'r-c wiLLLilt ;1E, 11GIIIl :ill ;LI211 I0::11 police_ sanitary anti t'lllei g:]Iratt•]Its .ire not in aL}.::II : vLiil '.'I rl.:l I 1}i; 5.' ,"111i:I1 inL:I udc3,-ia i 1•i'.11 I11LF1 1;tnt1 i;suN Olie City. 23 I he ii nt.-•- :il t:C :I`. r'I(ILaor:Llai [.t1S ,71iI :.'SL'_:l:ll s11.L1' G'I•St11 IISc;, C t`ISr,ir1a1 "% CSlrrl'll:.11c41 1pulr;1.1"MHC to Ordinance No. 1-1-417., Hr :1 i ittcl',rtit pciL(1 prnvicl�s CIL. +_:i!; titii[l1 <I,l;tiriL}r::rl dint tot tl°";'••i•..nAe an;i aii crtci i15 ptiltili.c health, .. '_ : iu: tv 'il_1r r4:[ eli nl4 t'4 and -/a+I}I1 1 :LtsJ lar.'I tlaw r�+�tila!iE;la� : lararrl C� the estibli ii rit nt and cp'rl:I1il1I 01 -unlicensed mlriju :i3 USS. Ordi:i a}cG; 1i•f12:1 24. RCW 36,70A.390 provides that "A county or city governing body that adopts :t moratorium, interim zoning map, interim zoning ordinance, or interim. official control without holding rl public hearing on rho proposed moratorium, interium zoning map, interim zoning ordinance, or interim official control, skull hold it public bearing on the adopted moratorium, interim zoning map, interim zoning ordinance, or interim official control within at least sixty days of its adoption, >,vltcther or not the governing bx lyr received a recommendation an tate mortar from the p'.annitm commission or departillent. if the governing body docs not adopt findings of fact justifying its action before this hearing, than the governing boo shall do so immediately af.er this public hearing. A moratorium, interim zoning I'nap, interim zoning ordinance, or interim oftic.ia', control adopted under this section may be effective for not longer than six months, but may be effective for up to one year if a work plan is developed for related studies poviding such a longer period. A moratorium, ictterim zoning trap, interim zoning ordinance or inlerint official control may be renewed f'ar one or more six-month periods if a subsequent public hearing is held orad finding of Fact are made prior to each renewal." 25. A ntaratal•iurl enac:s:d under RCW 35A 61 T"b And/or RCW , , 76p, NO L ;,triad by which local governnit7.i; r:1rLv llres:.rve the siattis [IJ.' }i? i11:.: I1'.\; .11,,111'': .ill-' I'-_',lLiaL; iiI I1Ol b rendered moot by ir,tc.r ,, 11,: 1:..xclopmertt, 3G: RCW 35,x.63.' A trite! RCob' 16.10A.390 both rt_u.',•. I I I ;, 4i1:0ri, ori, ink Ii1r. i111Lr1,a Map.. 1.4t.tla•1L11 :511111:_ .'Lillll.liltiC, ':.},' Ii1(.r611 O`LIrr�cial r c,11'.[.:1 Col 111, I I'1rr:.1 5 :: [nD1rtI1 13;::;iicl5 it putplie huarin} is itf'1, ill."-` c .::1['. tlulde prior Th,: city ;7r ar;er!', l 111 :i l ,: ,.1•aticc firths pLl'..I!c llemrinr 01. LIlc 1:11 :., II -.)r- mu! r- n141rarannLIni on iIIlil4 [Sy Inanjuz.11;', L `L'•; tT ii;;1ih, c`ti'.1:.II;z11.:1 i11 L'Lli",11; I„7 [_ IILf .`; 1 I. I:.L A period :I: 11i1`IIlhs, tri. ''Jt_•`,:=1-J-, :r i 1 i 7:: r'::1:,•+.: r +t:rc:lt,'_ 1 ltr+l 1: .:Ll pLI}]lic ,tic li. Counc Ptrstltlnl_ U::r li[.:1�,' >; �...+'I.r.''2C' ;,n41. .CW 36,70A.390, on Nov'an7:xer O. 2015, the City Council con.JC1. o :1 illtl}I.c 17tnr,112. 1:11 t11.2 rr:Ilt;1`Z. and exter15iot1 of ale tl'P ir;Litiri11n'1 Lill III' licensed 111:71T11.1.LI1:+ 11 .C•;, S71"I�'.I1JII pLil':ti111IlI to ?:'WIIIli111L;E'- -No_ 14-02..1, for a P,'.`I•I;CI 1:1; si:. [i1JIIt!14• ?cF. t11 City Council rvt'1= vCci I_t'Stirl7;}n I,IQi11 partiuS wI;a Spoke at the public tlL,lri;[p_ TY1c Ci L}• t:ounl:il lL„s {;iktn Ju.: ral i:iL;aLion to all pot Ilc: Lestimony received. 30. Pursuant to WAC 197-11-8$0, the renewal and extension of the moratorium on unlicensed marijuana uses, originally established pursuant to Ordrtlance No, 14-021, for a period of six months is exempt from the requirements ora threshold detenninrztion under the State i;nvir amental Policy Act. 31. The renewal and cxlension of the moratorium on unlicensed marijuana uses. originally established pursuant to Ordinance No. til -02.l., for a period of six months 1,5 {:Orlskteill •vc.ith the goals and polkies of the City's Comprehensive Plan. 31 The City Council t'illds that the renewal and extension r?l' Lh' rid: ;:tlaillt sl t[nlic ,lsYtl marijuana uses, originally established pursuant to Ordinance No. l4 -r),. 1 Hi. ri'li L l si:; 1:1:11:11.;. is necessary for the immediate presr=rdation or Elba public health, public „1I t,, I,L;11.:. pidiFJ ll, peace. Suction 1., Renewal arld erI io;1. The moratorium on unlicensed marijuana uses, originally established pursiant to Or-dinaitce No. 1 is hereby renewed and extended fora period of six months from December 9, 2015, unless repealed. extended, or modified by Ilse City Council after subsegLLentpublic hearings) and entry or tlppropriate findings of fact, pursuant to RCW 35A.63.220 and RCW 35.70A.390, As part of the renewal and extension of the moratorium, the City shall continue to work through the work plan estab tisil.erl pursuant to Section 3 ar Ordinance No. 14-021. Ordinnam 15.023 Pae 5 of6 Section 3. Ratitic?hon. Any act tciisisieut with the authority set forth herein and prior to the effective date of this Ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 4.. Sevei bility. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any outer section, sentence, dame, or plu-nsc or this Ordinance, Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in frill force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provided by law. Passed by the City Councii this I ' day of December, 2011 ATTES Christine Bainbridge City Clerk to Forth: Of tjof the City Attorney Date of Publication: 12)04/2015 Effective Date; 12/09)2015 ® uan Grafas, Mayor Ordinance 15-023 Pep 6 of 6 AltaeLirnent C PROPOSED AMENDMENTS 1, Definitions APPFNDIN A DEFINITIONS A. General lirovisi©ns. 1. For the purpose of this Lal .rode, certainwords and teats are herein derined. The word "shall" is always mandatory. Thc word ''may" is permissive, subject to the judgineni of the person administering, the ei 'ode. 2. Worlds not defined herein shall be construed as defined in Webster's New Coi egiare Dictionary. 1. The present tense includes the future.. and the future the present. 4. Thc singular number includes the plural and the plural the singular. 5. llse of male designations shall also include female,. 13, Detiniticns, #*k it nufttctrlring, petroleum and coat products; The manufacture of asphalt paving, ruing and coating. and petroleum refining, See `industrial, heavy use category " :al'I 111911'1 CILI . lll' 111114) L.'111k,. . ,'- ._ IIl1'. ";5. "y, L 1.11PQ ` l`L: a'IL .:LW �} II +' .'1n1,21 ,. j, II 1 17 LIlIlI:1r115 :1 ofrt.11ll+l._. f!, ;,14.0 IL`IIS�7 1' Ii 11 h :] _... ._ 111 _ ., ,-� L, 1 :I l '+`..,, 1411" 1t _�,a1 1' a. Y11 I.1f l.' -.I I I 1,111.1 II I I. I 11 II L11 _�I 111. II - I. Li[III. L;.kll ,Li1,Y t I 11 1, 1 Ile'4, iI, .ILw1 L11114_'r .wi 1,:r :Iwti ] ; h11.4111 I. L1,1IL'III. . 1. :11;1#'1LLll[#ll ClitfpL"C'LIttVC": 611911 :.`BI:L i"''I',l .1;: 1...2 I,1L]II LI ill''1;.11li Fa" '.4:Ii41i_E r+[I ' l..- •111.)[-v.1 ..'1111-I[-v.l Ill L:1:! I'11.-:'111L'.L 1'. ,;0111Ii41-4L'1.1 Yl 111' 1' • 'eaLI. .jtl.11I `. I1 I 1 L1 ..I IrI!.t'L1 ,11•0ti 1;.!I:I11,:x1 110>r 1 'l_ 11,11 } I l ,IL'.11111 4 ,' ,lnwiIli I. I' I.}1LIII'1114 .1'., .Its ?]� ]11 111ti .'�ktLIII ri.4111y1 I I'"11I:141uy J'Yll ] rn�L'�vlll'�" i.1,.1"xtl,lli.._ �. • I. '.t 'L1. 1'ti.'I• ail 111e 111;'.IIjIY:t1-:p �III,111,tC'�t'1'L'ti; Marijuana processing: Processing marijuana into usalbl'e marijuana, marijuana-i1'>tvsed products, and marijuana concentrates, packaging and labeling usable n111rijLLlnJ, rnarijunna-infused products, and marijuana concentrates for sale in retail outlets, and sale closable marijuana, marijuana -infused products, and marijuana concentrates at wholesale by -a marijuana processor licensed by the w` r l; i 4+ tI .State Liquor CoLntre1-:i_1 "'I L1;',i„K. Board andI I ;`.; ' Echaptcr 09.501 RCW, as Roy.. adopted or hereafter amended. See "`industrial, light use category." Attachment C Marijuana praclaction: Production and sale of marijuana at wholesale by a marijuana producer licensed by the ' State liquor n4Ral_e * t'.anib _„ Board and pIl_r.li_il_d �ti G,ktapter 69.51) Rt,W, as now adopted or hereafter amended. See "Agricultural and animals, use category," ll arijuona sales: _Selling usable ;rlarijuana, rnarijutata-infused products, and marijuana concentrates in a retail outlet by a marijuana retailer licensed by the '.i1ll' 1.11.,Sta€e Liquor c3rrz el,n1�" �'a117E4:1Ik1, Board, abr1 \\ltl: .1114 '.Ir7,�l:.<1111,` .1C�Y.'t' :1,L' .11 ,+1•t.11 "Yti 9;k1' .1t 1i1� 116I11i71 Lh. :61� LI.': 11 1 '. Cl7 1.17 .211.101,C11,1141 :1.4ti,IL6;liLl'. Y till Fl1.lilil.I:I::.Y Iv1,71�. II1•:� ..11l'L; 1116.: 1101 11411!1;•1 ltr 111,1ripllml ,'tiaIc. ;t l.Ii 1.9.11:L•:,1ti•!:S�•I 6' Til 6aI, 11.1 11 c;4111 of 1111111"+_ 1 $1.11•nlillll 11 :III ..11.1,.1.-;c 1-1%' •'i' ,L: 1. 1'! i III;IIIJIGPI!:I 1H1:1t G14;It. 1'4ti.t1111'a,• :_17 c IllIt'1''iLrl 11"111_ .1 4 1;11:ini .1 C._haptcr ilk) RCW, as now adopted or hereafter amended. See "Retail sales, use category." 1�a1'1�trortrt 1111 a IILLIl14'.II l'Fk111INL'JX6t'11t: 0;14'41,1::pl:1 114 ;L !1.1k''It•iI:L ..:111114';` 1U:41I .d b :Il: t Gl �.11 _ ,17. X1.:16. l_IS' I+ :' ;tll.l I_IU113:11ht•. 1„.., r.. flu.: 11 4tI,C4'i -11'_1IL'J 61l:.1"I �I:'.'.t •.Ilal'll ._.19';116 1'111 1,411! '.�4tll`i:'' 11tt -tp� l:1 ':' .1;11,1 ...j1 1. fly .% [Itlµ7J`C:1" !) Market outdoor: A temporary or seasranal location where produce and agricultural products including, bill. not limited to, pumpkins, (Christmas trees and firewood, as well as crafts and °t1 ur items, are offered far sale to the public. See "Retail sales, use cat :t or}',' Anachtnent C u. SVNIC 19.120.050 19120.050 Permitted use matrix. Permitted Use Matrix Use CategaryIType Residential Zone DiSirict5 Cotnmerciaf and Industrial Zone Districts Supplemental Conditions Agriculture and Animal 11 R_ 4 MUC CO 0 11 RC ' i 1- Kennel S S S See Zoning (110105f -or rnndetions Marijuana production Orchard, Tree farming, commercial Food and Gave€urge Service Chapter 19.85 SVMC 11 III 1111 P Espresso establishment P P PPPPP A P P Ofiariilrana club. or icungc II IIIII : izAptcr .1•T255.- SV MC Attach neat C_: Permitted Use Matrix Use Category/Type Residential Zone District s`'fi ch•lr R -IR - 1 i2 3 R- 4 MF -MF - 1 2 Commercial and Industrial Zone Supplemental Conditions Districts CMU GO 0 NC RC 2 Irirlustrial, Light M2rurar',w ir1g, light Mariiucana processing S S S S S s S S SV C 19_60.010(L).19.7O.01O( )(2) S 5 S S Chapter 19 85 SVMC Plastic injection molding, thermoplastic P P P P Residential Dwelling. townhouse Manufactured home park P S P S P P SVMC 19,40.130 mites hrnent C Permitted Use Matrix Use Category"Type Residential Zone Districts Commercial and Industrial Zone Distrlets Supplemental Conditions R- 1 R- 2 R- 3 R- 4 MF -MF- 1 2 MUCCMI!GD 0 NC C RC PADS I- 1 I- 2 I. ii1i r F VOi 'Cr nti dc ;i., -9 :.1.-..:r t.1 t4 `,ViL Retail Sales Manufactured ?some sales P P Y Marijuana sales S S S S = Chapter 19.155 SVMC Market, mitdtlrr P P P P P 9 A = Accessory use, C = Conditioral use, P = Permitted use R = Regional siting, S = Permitted with supplemental conditions T -• Temporary use Attachment C 1It. SVNMC 19.85 A. Marijuana production shall be located or ritaintained at Fast 1,430 feet from W': ilcatusR prcperty lute, measured from the nearest property line oldie nnarijuana production facility to the nearest prcDerty line of any one or more of the following uses: 1. Vacant or undeveloped parcels awned by public chorwl districts Iii _,s-estbtrisltei RCW Title 18A; 2. Vacant or undeveloped pur=ls owiad by public libz.ay districts 1, ,rs ectal shed win t= irapter 2f.L2 RCW; 3. Vacant cr undeveloped plruels 1ased or owned by the City; provided the thllowing shall be excluded Frorn consideration under #{ait~-e esti ar, ` F I a. Any storitv.vater facility or right-of-way parcels owned or leased by the City and designated or identified as a storinwtater facility or .i.,ht-ofway in any document, plan or program adopted b. the aunci1; and b. The: App1L"r,r:, `l -rail; ar 1. a. Any buildirtig; oni - 41 -a -p designated or identified in any docurne tt, plant, or program adopted by the: city council as "Spokane Valley City Hall" or other sirilai '.LL l that identifies such facilities ,; buildings, ii . .' ` eildin as the city's primary administrative and legislative location; or b. CcnterPlace. B. Mari.juana production in llrc regional commercial and community commercial zones shall only be permitted indoors. A. Marijuana processing shall be located or maintained at least i ;00U feet from the nearest properly line, measured from the nearest property line of the marijuana processing facility to the nearest property Linc of any one or more or the following uses: 1, Variant or undeveloped parols owned by public school districts I,u ',.:siir 1, -es-e•ttakaltsheel-i-ri RCA, Title 28x4; 2. Vacant or undeveloped parcels owned by public library districts r�.,-u,�nti t tel lislacd as G7,;hapter 217.117 RCW; 3. Vacant or undeveloped parcels leased or owned by the City; provided the following shall be excluded from consideration under E.14-ii-aeviensv a. Any stornnwater Facility or right-of-way parcels owned or leased by the City and designated or identified as a sturmwoter Facility or right-of-way in any document, pian or program adopted by the=t_auncil; and h. The Appleway Trni1: or 4. a. Any facility ,.: bttitcling- a npus. designated ur identifit l [n any document, plan, ctr Fragrant adopted by the city council as "Spokane Valley City Hall" or other Attachment Q similar terns that identifies such latcilities, cr`' I- i as the City's primary administrative and Ic,islatiY.i location; ur h. CenlerPlacc. E3. Marijuana processing in the regional corsllncruiffI 'uid COillilltiriity commercial zones shall be limited to packaging and label Frig of LIb1 marijuana. _ •. _ �1+_1i1,'1,1'i Ll,tll•I .,,IY, ti:k,III 11_'' I`: tiL•:'1111t11::1 15 h11111 til' ik'eLd, , I1 :u'll,hzll,! ti. [L+ Lt, , d'k ;',I, tll'.0 117,_E :I° lltll'_tIF1 - :I:`:,I Iwo .111 c9,:s1!1 ,I L,_ .1 Jot' III 'Ih_'wo_ Ct c_I II: -I I,.IILti ri Cl[. I:.'. IIV ;,.tilltllil •I,IL'1:^' I.'i' I, 11'" .I,' ..:1;11 h P74 I',CI .I, ,! l:'.:L1I 41,c wl.k!}Iti t' Il,kti I•,1111 ',5 iIITT E~tlilarijuana sales shall he bloated or maintained at [cast 1,000 feet from the nearest property line, measured from the Dearest property in of the marijuana wales facility to the nearest property line of arty one pr more or the Fol luwitl uses: . Centennial Trail; 131.. Appleway Trail; Vacant or undeveloped parcels owned Ey I'Sublic school districts RCW - "Isle 28A; ? t. Vacant or undeveloped parcels awned by public 'bra*. districts •`I •YI.l111 t. + :.uhIizlled ist €"Jtapier'", [' RCW; Vacant or tintfc,,c"!,lied parcels leased or !owned by the City; providod any storinwater fa^ility+ or right-of-way parcels (45A•]ii d or leased by the City and designated or idcsitifaed as a storrnwatcr facility or right-of-way in any dc.-.LImellt, plan or program artoplLucl by the *=. -iCy ouncil shall be excluded from consideration under thiS Section; far ",. a. Any facilityi'! bLliilding, eun:gt , r cal -e-4-14 -t?-1= F.-il;Einos designated cr identified in any decumcnt, plan, or program adopted by the city council as "Spokane Vallay City I1ai1" or other similar term that identities such facilities; I as the City's primily administrative and legislative location; or lh. CenterPlace. II?.!ii.t>•-tl ()II1c•t- IL L•IIscift if f• rd^.Iitl I"L't1 IIl:lri'tl:lts:1 Il,red YrtifLi:ai[t'tl. ``.IIllil Li�lti_a I.l:11 1;, III 1. ..I,Y ['• ;I1 tn.f ti',Lti ' :l1°,II'Ik1:,1 :: ,,;.11 •. ,IL! 1 ,'„_ I1L`r111114LI I:1LI 1I,ull l„ ▪ "tiSEt_ 111 tell l!.; sliLl '�rti t!}1 d. -.I llIIi- ILI iL i tor '.L ..l Irr'`L,:�[ LC;L I`l l;:°I:.1 Il+l'ti it" h1�117115:[L I tl�h ill 111 L,'�1 +�L .Ii_ t IL' I. I• 7,'1 tiIIIl119 1I,.! 111 Maly ti_ I',Ili , I1>Iil hi 7iiIL't1 i,i. i11:I1'Ijl1:111:1 L itl.l5w L`d' IL"I.II11S• ,111:[ ill... Iltla k _.?5'l!C ails i .. IV" roy,lll'_" I}IL11_tr 4.15 d1t Inat'1 11.111:1 �, L Ll:iiii:.11 1 L I.II1 •1.' alt L il.!ILI [til ,5'I:I_i til 11:`IIIL'llll;'.I 16ilhr i9ti til'. I'L=1'911 111 5• \IE" I')_alY5.I}+,dly L; lit I:1 L: Iii13 '.iii..W �'.lil'h wl:kl: I:IS` , I9.:45.0:51) ilturi)uan:1 i7kr1ltuLtlu l :Aries resld' nti;tl Llally'+. `-i;11.. [,14, alit1iL riFer ,..lLlaiklltif] Li:111ents' I.1I1i1 d.,...,;ktimicd�y1.'�", ICI.' ti I '71'x`1 11��' Ill._,9Ilii1 M I a IL[ 1�1 AnLi ell I411`l llll'_'ti, CL ItI�.n4'k'+. 71,11111!,1 L I11L". >,'111I,1 111.1 rl� ' tI11Lf tII'IJer �II11_ilvi`, e irL:!'llltil:Ii1L a :ind tti,;1L 111!`l Lk) :II'1°'I:u:EI°Iti iltiltr.11. +illi'*, :1'3L1 :I;l\ 1ii511�1`. I<:ti:•t11. Ldr L :ill•' Ll'': 11 111'.ti. I':tl':iLI '.1 i' L'.LLir: Ltlticll.%+ill°�' y1I ;t i•L<.ilc'1 1111' [,:y',+ ,: 1,:;•;i11: '..I t J.,C :'r'yt 15�; •11:IE IFL,1:::�L. tllt'I :h rL1]ILLI or [i:Sw[LI omit lit 1l 11b 1! "ai tl+ colifulialf,crc151tl1 .! 15 .Y !l 1..41ii4 ,t to 1k 14'L: IJ1 I;I',5 :lI1L, I 'S•ll,ilt iii,^ !:I` -k �ltl 111,ti4I ciLLI} .}r' 1lj'L7iE'S:"711�'�' .': 9tlilr..ju,iiit [tib .115 } :t'il! .1.1:111 tyL slll ;4l ki l�[ IL1� 111. lY�+S1, 1 l ,1 111tiy l.li�. tiWl,'tiil_°Lr', LI, }rllt:ilt', L I 51t11�1 41ni1,IM1 11 t1,�t,„_11 Attachmcni C IEP: I Ili r -11 110iJ 11 1;.K111 ir1 18, ' _111,. 21. '2 arjLI 2-1 -•;‘.\ 1,k; aro o, mi....1 111,2 10111.0,v,i11,1 0,2U111C1110111ti: .111%- 1111:1V 11:10.11.1.21'111 111;111i11,a 111 I 11111 111:1,-,111 1"1411\1011 i 1`A 1101 111. L'Ill in! Ll 13.. ij III.; IT: 111'2 ptirtiOti 1111.1 [114,' rfii111i,L 1 .:11.1.. itorc,r11 or ,11; 11 : . PO" 1)'1)._ NCIP4S0r5 IJI•-Ji 1 riC,11011%11: 10:1,0,1.0.111:11 i 01111,1. 1%.1%127, 2-1n_kaurcs. :11.111 ;11 11%11110011 10 1 101'.1;_n2...g.<.""1:•111122.111111,. ;'.1 -.1.1 11 1101 iii [°02 :11x 420011‘11:,:lili;,.: ;1 ;(1 110i% '011'11 Z1111 !il 1.1L111 1,1%%ti 11.i1I1liI",1-: 111%1 1..;14111111).1, 1111%1 ifl .1" 1%1111.X.,N1 lig:Hu:41a 111 ::111% 1..,J71,11 1.. 'dal,' 11111'.1.1, • 111 ;,11;'11L:11.1.11L' 11111,111% 1.%' .1110%%.'e. . k•- '1:141 /111/LA. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Planning Commission Action Detecting Bute: October 222.20 [5 Item: Cheek all that :apply: ❑ public hearin3 ❑ consent ❑ old business E❑ new business ❑ information 0 admin. report ❑ pending legislation FILE N U M.BER: CTA --2015-0006 AGENDA iTFI"t TITLE: Study sessiolt— Recreational and Medical Marijuana Regulations DESiCRIlPTION OF PROPOS 2'1 L: Providing nn update and bcacki'ri?LJ:lLI i::i l 11rC' ll1 recce tT,onai ant:, Lily:h A. 111211;,j ii is lir .`o .i, ineiud nig recent 2015 Slate Legislative amendments an" lllti (its ti u7 Lnt marijuana regulations. Discuss poSSihl options for amendments to City regulations. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70,4-106; RCW 69.50 (c:adik)ng Initiative 5021: RC' .' 69.5 LA; SVMC t7.130. 150 and 19,30.041d; SVMC 19,&5; SVMC 19.120.050 PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: City Council Lias adopted regulations as set forth in SV MCl'),I"_t},p lJ and SVMC 99.85 for the zoning and buffering of :recreational marijuana and Further adopied rriaratoriurn an all new marijuana uses which are nor licensed by the Washington State Liquor and Catna+ais Board (primarily rnedic:tl ruarijuana). On October 6, 2015, City Council :aclflptLd LI rrillra[slriurn an marijuana uses licensed by tate Washington Liquor and Cannabis Board. BACKGROUND: In December of 20:14,, the Sp ,ane Valley City Council adopted Ordinance Nc. 14- 021 which established a moratorium on the establishment ornll marijuana rises other than rip 'aim. producers, marijuana prrrcessors and marijuana retail sales as licensed by the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board (WSLCB). This included all medical marijuana establishments, which at the time cvere net regulated by the: State or WSLOB. Pursuant to Ordinance No. I4-021. the City established a work plan to work through ar.d adopt puns:a: m:ru regulations for such medical marijuana uses. On October 6, 2015, the Spokane Valley City Council adopted Ordinance No. 15-017, which established a moratorium on all marijuana uses licensed by the WSLCE. Pursuant tro:Ordinance No. 1.5-017, the City established a work plan to ‘vorkthrolugh arid adapt permanent regulations for al! lria.'ijuana use licensed by the WSLCB. This study session will provide background material on the development of marijuana Taws. Further, staff will outline three types of possible options in order to initiate Planning Comm i5sie n discussions an City marijuana regulations. Once Planning Commission has given ("section on what type of regulations, City staff will return at a later meeting with proposed amendment language for further Planning Commission discusSii r and a public hearing J"Lfcrcadrnfra1 Marijuana BackrrouJx1: Recreational rrtarijuana: was legal zed yitbii Washington State with the passage of 'initiative 5D2 (1.542) i11 November 2012. The State has winked over the last three years to develop extensive regulations for I ic2nsir.g and permitting of production (growing), procc43jng, and retail sales of recreational marijuana. Ali recreational marijuana facilities must be licensed by the WSLCL3. The WSLCB began accepting and processing applications in November 2013, and issued the first production and processing licenses 4witltin Spokane Valley in 7viarch 2014. As provided by law, the WSLC13 developed rule to!1 lil number of retail licenses within each jar,risdiction. Th City wrr,9 Ellecaied three recreational r:i• li_c1--•=, and the W LCB has issued all three licenses and staff understands that all three retail shops arc , :: 1 :;r•,i operational. Under state law, there is no restriction on the number of prodx tiara and processin :e ili[ia allowed, although there was originally a cap on the told amount of matte' ion space statewide. Currently, tip:. City has 19 licensed production and 21 licensed processing facilities. State law provides 1,000 tbot buffers between licon ed marijuana facilities and sc�. x:,11 ell t -J ;ti including schools, libraries, and public parks, but excludes trails and undeveloped ;cl,,�,tiC a,r lil rlr. property. The WSLCB enforces the ~lite buffers through the state liccnsfng process. Or; i ri ar'.• l`!. 2014, a WasltivaF,ton Attorney General Opinion was released that provided that the Attorney Lrenc:af opinion was that local jurisdictions were not pf•cempted by 1-502 from adopting local regtllat1I-J.1)(1 restrictions on. state -licensed recreational rnarijLI tIKa uses. `Che City's buffers are in :icldrtirlrl r,:, -he of rr mandated buffers aanJ are enforced by the Ciry. All marijuana uses remain illegal under the federal Controlled Substances Act. However. the United State Department o Justice has released a police to not prosecute licensed marijuana. providers in stiles which. have legalized mar juuna %nd which have a strong enforcement and regulatory scheme. Medico/Marijuana a a Brtckgrvarrd.• Crt 199%1, voters approved the medical use of marijuana by initiative, though approval was liii[nitrd 111 scnl1.C. in 2011, the Washinctcn State Legislature adopted amendments !o the medical ntarijuzann laws that would have created a state registry for patients and legalized dispensaries and collective garde as. Governor Gregoire vetoed all sections related to the state registry and dispensaries, creating a laryc ~amount of confusion and leaping collective gardens as the sole legal means for producing and pi -c :Lorin medical marijuana- The City did not adopt regulations at that time, but issued business registrations for collectives, provided they were located in a zone where retail sales were appropriate. With the passage of 1-502 and legalization of recreational marijuana,. them developed two very distinct and separate marijuana regulatory regimes — a licensed and regulated recreational rnarket and an unregulated end tu-:1icew:ed medical market.. In 2015, the \Vash[ragtun State Legrslat.rrc passed major changes, to existing medical marijuana laws in an effort to re ii':.iIc the =din] and re::rcratio..litI marijuana mar.:ki:ts- There were print iy bills passed aS part of tic c:Iran«c's'; Sccortd Sub.itif-tre Vie:°r:rtr f3:1i 4057. (Citi :mils Patient Pre recon» '.c.1) and Seeand E agr used Second Substitute House 3111 2136- `I I,a major cr,:t11.,e.. ii e ud d rli4 %:mooring: Ree.. inetle Me'd{1cal and RPC!'Lrtiiralal A'ial'lj!far3:7 beta! cci f ,311 hei -27cdical lntrriiu;.rr er•rlVrscntenr' I,: r is ,::i:,i ; "F; . i +l;nl.'; retailers, This erakirJaJineat rallr'wtis r1 li4rll-A;I:i r'ctAller pakient5 slid dei i`.r-.4a:r- d I:ri.l': niers. • I•hc r°rw:tli: t. min -9,13;1U t;dvi.se.ln :nt does not tlae licensed retailer from also rt:l,il,i' I[..I'CKit:Dr:lt m,trijriana. • Qualtl� in;; r.:6Lflrs and designated prcm,ider-- r.iav rtce~i'.e an exemption from the State's 7:•r':j1L;i i:t t:::, 0:11 1) ,:}otchaeing medical rst[rrijuiir3.1 ir0.1m a 1ircnscd retailer with a medical ;ti,ir'.I�ra a,1 call: e ntr,r!.. C'rta:r> :l:cdica. r, :l ".jug rl. :r,.1il;:rir.;2';ir ra I tabasc that qualifyine patients Lnd designated 1}r{14'.liLl' r" -L'S. be cniereel ill 'Cr, rs I':t.i nt5 and I�rc,ti i,itr' ll •:,ht,li:t ,.r:.a !,1i[i I. :trig tit if ie ilkarirt. utero to purchase a 'I hs' :t;1,;l1 ;s .0 r'lu t be; lerariti sal ibv Jul). '.,''t1 6 ; zrcE,_llti roust c:a<e aTet';1tiOF :is r1r'.lrtl,. Changes la Licensing - WSLCB must reconsider and increase number of retail outlets to accommodate medical marijuana nods. WSLCB must develop merit based application process Far new retail licenses. - 'WSLCB must increase canopy limits For produzers to account for incdirlll Irlurijuana. needs. - Restricts the use el butane or other gases 1 ' mar i t;!;;A .'rrrl3Ct11.1:1 L. ', ,LI].11`• licensed marijuana processors (no home extraction with those - retailers may not Belk them Ih vrndin4 - Establishes a transportation on license for iorrtrnon - Establishes a research license. • Allows licensed researchers to re :l':I.', 1t i1 :I ;}c tcnc'r, c:i,3, :=_1 ,r1VCSti^atir:1 into marijuana -derived drug products, and ciliL:E)V ;ell.; :1e1111inimerirly_ rrlilriIi:ana as medical treatment, and to conduct !?�I, :Ilii �r,,rlt9 ll.r,,ll resc:�rc41 - RuqulreS Signage at the remises of j1Y'",•'.''==CI't I1I'O1]LY r r:i, 13,1*L'uti4 +" -, ;111[1 1' Cit:'.Lr 11"i?5'12IIrig notice to the public of the intent to license ti7e trei]ities as a marijuana producer, proc sst r, or retailer. Allow for troaperalNes '(N: = a:,..'.r r!l 1 20.16. e - , Iltr., ti l`or the cre31ire1 "l:til,?pL' Lives'` that may l''v Fbrniei1 by up to four qualii.ii1_ I; tlitlltr 1: • : t1'° Cia:1L'S Ci-iRlt'.'. 1' IC•...'1r..Li "s`.%i1:;1 i Cr i;tllt el ula:.I=i.. ',:7 r.'.I :I C;S ,'I' ti'1t111R 1.4O) feet of playground,. 1 r.°,I.i+'11 -:'els :r , child care: cent,: 1%4. 1°I :tic packs, public transit Ceutess, library, O1' :Ell'liL.1.' t: :'. 111ti ilrt:lt1Cs. • CQupt'l'clti'. IDt`;Ilairl1 l t l r; l':,` :;.L"' `il v.'!tl'r elle '1'.1.1.:13.. • The location of ;; LL )pvl':1tI\'L Iiiu 1 II'll• I,` a olle ofthc participants and only one cooperative:11..071' Ii_ r c:11a:1 oil :3 Aingic I'tr)pc -I.} • Cooperate ='v5 111)1.0 :, IIIR:tillrt'J,11 .1E ...oh • The WS -LCI 111'tLV olid L I';:lvti i'+ Iil'.I:l :i> ".C' Il:r .lila i.'=arr:.it' 10..0:.lt'Irlent for cooperat1 VCS . • Cooperatives are not considered busirli ew f:,,tl ' riw ,• only distribute to tete four members), so rio basin:: s licenses or taxes. • May rloi locate where prohibited by a c it county wring provision. ` nrr.r!"ir Poi lolls and Designated Providers - C.'lu C ruccive authorization from health ore prr-l-L sicirrill Authorization and recognition cud i '.1111''1 Iti`. darab;3Se are necessary t0 receive arrest protection. - May keep amounts of (marijuana listed on authorization card - May grow up to 15 plants in house. • lal} more than 15 planes per hiiltsir:g unit regardless r11ow many patients reside in the housing unit (except for cooperatit:::s, +ti'll.c i 111 .i (lilt c 6.0 it I:lelc.9. - i 1d prodllctic n I 11rnccssin: if any portion can he seen irl,nl 11,Y'�i 11[1 1'.-iI711 Lel s_t11 Iii: I'ronl a e't'i1°ti: ;7111+-:'Y co k'r ivc'ite property of arioncQr hi7!.Itiin4. ul'IlL- - cd,T.0 4i]I adopt rules allowing no ii-eenOtisti h le exalt;lion k ti gtii:l1H:LI p;Itic•rllti i : rce'i- alti de i,!2luteti pro) -i. ;eCS- Local .-f rrthor•ity - Repeals RCW 69.51A.140, which granted cities and counties the 0:: ..I L.srl'++:-•;4 requirements related to medical marijuana, including zoning. Cities are authorized to adopt civil penalties for patients and designated play�+tL growing/keeping plants outside the limits set by S13 5052. - Cities may adopt ordinances reducing the buffers between licensed facilities nnd rccrcatinn ccntr.;rs, child care centers, public parks, public transit centers, libraries, or game arca.e which is not restricted to those over 21 from 1,000 feet to not less than 100 feet, provided uely clisrmnce reduction will not negatively impact the 7turisdicti,on's Civil regulatory enfarcernenl, criminal law enforcement interests, public safety, or pudic health. • Buffers to schools and playgrounds may riot be reduced below the state required 1,000 feet- - Subjcet to any rules adopted by the WSLC:B, cities and counties may adopt an ordinance prohibiting a marijuana pradueer or professor from operating or locating a business within ;meas zoned primarily fc'r residential use or rural arc with a minimum lot size of five acres or smaller. A$ part of the changes, the State must increase the number of retail stores to account for the medical marijuana market. The fiscal note indicated an cstirnotc that approximately 400 new retail quires would be licensed, which would effectively double the number ortrliowable retail stares througho!:r The WSLCTfd is currently in its rulemaking process as discussed in further detail below. City Regulatory Background: In response to 1-502. the City adopted permanent regulations on July 22, 2014. The regulati.i .:. now east, are set fort}, in SYNC 19,120.05 D (permitted use matrix) ami SVMC 1,983 and [my.- i t.r' :1; follows: - State licensed marijuana production (outdoor and indoor growing) is a permitted use ire Heavy Industrial and Light ladustrial zones. Indoor growing only is permitted in Regional Comrnercial and Comm unity Comrtercial zones. State licensed snarijunrta processiu , (131.-eling and pack -aging, and chemical or other extraction) is a permitted use in he Heavy Industrial and Light Industrial tones. Packaging and labeling of useable niar Juana only is permitted in t e�:iunuI Commercial and Community Commercial zones. Both production and processing uses may not he located within 1,1]O0 feet of City Halll. CenterPlace, vacant City property (other than stonnwater and public rights-of-way'), vacant library property, and vacant school proper:v. Produe ion and processing may be located within 1,000 Feet ref the Applewny Trail, prcvid:,l !I7,r! the location is still in the appropriate zone (there are few Regional Commercial and C.:!rr,:rrnity Commercial zones within 1.000 feet of the Appletvay Trail). - State licensed marijuana retail sales ore permitted in the Mixed Use Center, Corrido, Mi ted Use, Regional Cornrricrcirrl, and Commu:iity Commercial zones, - Licensed ri tail sales may not be !anted within 1,060 feet of City flail, CerrtcrPlace, vacant City property (other than stormwater and public rights-of-way), vacant library property, vacant school property, the Appleway Trail, and the Centennial Trail. Further, anter the passage of 1-502, the City saw un increase in the number of collectives (unregulated :r)edical marijuana) seeking business registrations_ The City passed a moratorium on unlicensed :rtarijuarta uses (e.g., primarily medical marijuast$) pursuant to Ordinance No. 14-021 on December 9. -.IA 14 rcr allow the City to determine what action the State would take to reconcile the medical and recreational marijuana markets and to develop its own regulation$. In response to the WSLC13's err r,�ency Rules on September 23, 2015 (described in detail below), the City adopted a moratorium on marijuana uses lictnised by the WSLCFF in order ro allow the City to comp the consideration, development, and adoption of its regulations without allowinp additional licenses to vast or create potentially inconsistc l- or incompatible uses, The tnoratoriulsl did not impact existing: marijuana uses which had a]rettdv received a License from the WSLCR. 1-1nwever, it will prevent the City from processing any applications from collectives which wish to receive a retail ticensc From the WSLCI3. Further, the moratorium did not inn pact any home use or consumption. Thus, as it stands, the City has three existing licensed retail stores, 19 licensed producers, and 21 licensed prccessors, with two moratoriums that elTectiv'ety prohibit any further licensed retailers, producers, or processors until the City adopts its regulations, I wSLC!3 20)5 Rrrteraki,v Or. September 23, 2015, the WSLC13 issued, effective inin ediately, its Emergency Rules ar I5-I &, which removed the cap on the number cif marijuana retail stores, with the cap to he set at a later date, ar,d provided for the WSLC13 to begin accepting and processing marijuana retail license -applications beginning on October 12, 2015. Ft'rther, tl'te.,inergeney l .0 les specified procedures for marijuana retail licensees to apply for medical marijuana endorsements and removed the statewide cap on the total amount of ntarijniraa production space, with the total amot i t to beset at a letter da1:c.'. Concurrently with the F mergency Rules, The WSLaCI3 issued is proposed Rules 15- I 7- Those rules implement the new laws aduotird in 2015. Telt; rules include the following: Specifics the priority w iI. t4rini1'.k,: Iii 4-.➢rderi11 which nlarijuana retailer:: arc �i4Ciliid!. • First pri ri"1' i t[� tL1[1tiL' l,�rll .C•iii ',-11•:? I_ l ;7r Y1.'1"r2 iitCl[IIi�' S : I : 11'SC11<C.-[.;. collective r'.rckii 1ir:. r 1l", January . -C ° } (.'_F tpplirLi 11)1 °�":1r1 1ii.. it t°-S;1 Ilr 'i,VSLCB, (31 live maintair.t rl state ane lul~al business liceas' , and (4) aro cul r:,21u required ta:e., • Second prior iter is to those applicants who {1) owned or were m4mbers c,i a marijuana collective garden prior to danuaxy 1, 2013,(2) have maintained stare arc' local husi;less license, and (3) are current in all required tuxes. • Third priority is tu ail other applicants. m[11 .11,25 slate laws and allows applicants to locate 11:i1:1 :il] ,..r 'rill i lv2 Sr.: (0111(.. LI'Uile SC',I —.:-o ti arid play rC.17rrnCIS) it'.11C La::a CIL`, II<r p:!,t.rt'w' `:EI w'r'(I1:1'ull,'L°;sll..w`aar'_ wta:ll illl. 4'l r•-•d r:tl,:!I - Prov'dos that outdoor grows C:arinot .;] • ltic,;:t1'-4'- :11 ILC347 20 tic: trout cad)L Lh z -;a'1..5 mLxirnunl prod t;t'tion space ;11 .',1`.:11'3 7tli 1 lir• :t. ties :IY.6:li.;1 :t1 !.i:t,l'i::1.tt, i7rc}'r i sIythe Mil\I[17'.r111 till k 5'. :LS L.1 I?:: ?CC by r",ahtiC up 1,i 11,i!Lionkt�LJJ t' pewee. - Provides that a producermas atdaa proccssor [Mit -;,u114 Isr+ erl. - Sets rules for applying for, receiving, and tnainteiliiug a mtd:cal ma.rii•.raItn endorsement. • At least 25% of the inventory must be medical marijuana to maintain the medical marijuana endorsement. - Specifies that the WSLC13 will accept retail lict:nse applications during tele time fr.sti- , sat Furth on their website. Further. specifics that, tete maximum nernbl:'r 1 f i.ctaiI lit.t nRc per Lt1urt.' w il. he set at a lat:r date. - Expands requirements for certain types or pr-ocessirlg exir:rd tarn s seems• - Allows two retail advertising signs (up from one). Each sigh may tic 1,600 square inches, Sell ruts fc}I' l: I�ly'i't!' Iti;, 1C'C'L:I',i11C"„ :anal nldina3it1.::,4 .1 il',Ir'a}.'r1;it.R''1. !.ali•,4. • Iransparinti.In'.i'iiic1; must be tJIC purnitiL41 s -° Si: rc;Ic� €i r zr..cperitti,ves. I:1c 1IL!l:lti l"ca, .Ii::tic_'n :'L:au:ran-ar.ta, }I:;tlt Haar wall I rouianor ?rola, and reao;'4I-kc. pili a Na &amen, eairaction. City Raga/al/on Options. Planning Commission may consider a r�.nue afoptions for the City. The options range from ataint; iirina current regulations to adopting some hurdler limitations (float would allow a limited i,icrzttr•.t: in 1ioc;tsed marijuana uses) to adopting a han on additional licensed marijuana uses. Staff presented puteraial concepts to City Council at its .August 18. 20'5, meet . I7urina that meeting, Couneil indicated a desire restrict maryuana uses to their oi.trrent levels at to rttiniltTi x increasing the number of stores. State law would likely preclude the Ciro from expressly setting the number ofstories to be allocated within the City, but the City may adopt reasonable land use regulations go4'erning the nml location of such stores. One option Council discussed was possibly including an additional buffer prcveining retail stores from locating within 1,000 Feet of any other licensed a e. Option 1: Rely on existing regulations. This.ipproaclt would leave the existing City regulations in pima.: to deal with any additional retail, production, and processing licenses. boder this option, Plann;ng Commission should consider whether there should be arty additional regulations for cooperatives (which can only be located in residential zones). This would allow a potential increase in the number at retail, production. and processing stores within the existing acmes and subject ccs tate buffers. Thu lunate evould ultimately be set by the Stare. Underthis option. staff would recommend minor changes lo exiatiitia definitions to ac'el ant Fur retail steres With medical marijuana cnricrsements, Cinder chi; option, there are 727 available parcels for retail stores. However., not all are available due to market constraints and (alto: commercial operations that take up asignificant number of those parcels. Opiicre 2: Adapt additional limitations, such as buffers 1-etween licensed rrtatuarta uses, cooperatives, or further limiting the allowable zcnr a licensed uses may locate. For ex:zt-ral.a if Planning Corninission wished to further limit stul , , a.-Jouial adopt a 1.000 fona buffer betwaaa halls-La! retail stories and all other licensed marijuana uses. This wrnild limit the number ofavatlable p'::'.:lo I However_ this docs not take into account any existing commercial stores occupying those parcel! market-factor limits ori those parcels. Further, stnee thele are licensed stores and due to potentla.1 nuisance-type impacts on neighborhoods, Planning Commission could consider prohibiting coal: :raai•.'c4 (Hoene grows of up to GO plants). I.fice:lscd marijuana cues arc currently allowed in (`our zoi " l P. MLC, RC, and C. This could Ix tilr'thcr restricted to limit tete areas where additional licensed wIulps a.m.]IiI locate by either reducing the available -Lancs or adapting, an overlay zone limiting where licensed rra:%juarta may be located. Existing stores that might otherwise be impacted by any new regulAlt-i4 II; would become legal non-conforming uses mid X41 wrnuld not be adversely impacted. Option 3: Adopt a prohibition an e n w: ;!1 lel type al licensed marijuana uses. Existing licensed 111 !s would become legal more -can forming and so would nut be required to stop operation: haaa?t'cr, [rah ibition, WtDu1d prey Itt :my addia.ali. l !ivenscd uses. Note that while .7staff believes a prohil-itiat valid, there ;lava LailC'i4 u1 elle^.t!' .,'.'a.i"• +',:4'1=1or v il•.lo'tit1! ciry"ss authority to ban I Ice ISL:d IIIA r:j,ia:ii Itilti. and su4[ 1.1 4:,111➢1 I �ti.lall''I','e'I` t II.( \'�',it i 4;t' ur i Il'I:ty, tl.' 11 Ille 4 i'.y were ehallen; ed on a LiiI:ition.. `\(},i.iCF- 'untie: u1 ...rtN. lar 1Itc,;1•:i ;i:tli:.iclments~.ill be provided in a timely manner to comply with Tolie.1111:. pi ti.. APPROVAL CRITERIA: SVIWIc Section 17.80.15')(F) pravidus appruuttl criteria for text amendments to the SV MC. The criterion stipulates that the proposed amendment(s) must be consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive. Plan and bear a substantial relation to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection cfthe environment_ RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Staff is peeking Planning Commission development of and consensus on an option. Once art option is +nevveIcpcd and approved in concept, staff will draft appropriate proposed amendments based upon that concept for Further Planning Commission car�sidc:: tttio�t. STAFF CONT'4CI: Christina Janssen — Planner !entry Nickerson — Senior Plans Examiner Erik Lamb — Deputy City Attorney A TTACEMENTS: r1, f rescntation B. Maps of exiitiri ; :Mores and potentlal additioiral buffers APPROVED Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers — City Bald, October 22, 2015 Chairman Stay called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. Ms. Horton took roll and the following members and staff were present: Kevin Anderson Heather Graham Tim Kelley [Mike Phillips, absent - excused Susan Scott Jac Stcy Sarn Wood Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney Lod Barlow, Senior Planner Jenny Nickerson, Sr, Plans Examiner Christina Janssen, Planner Deanna Horton, Secretary oFthe Commission Hearing no objections, CommiS=cusedrormm the October 22, 2015 meeting. Commissioner Graham move:r r,� t!t f :.,� . ?;r�: October 22. 2015 crgendet as presented. The wale on the motion was six in favor, Posses. Commissioner Anderson moved to o,_c opt the September 24, 20)5 rain:rtes as presented The vote on the motion wars six in favor, zero against, motion passes. COMMISSION REPORTS: Commissioner Kelley reported he attended the Traders Club Meeting. Commissioner Wood reported he attended the City Council meeting on October 20, 2015. The other Commissioners had no reports. AIME0STRAT IVE REPORT: No administrative report. PUBLIC COMMENT: No public corn ments_ COMMISSION BUSINESS: Study Session: CTA -2015-04:106 Marijuana Regulation$ Deputy City Attorney Erik Lamb began the evening explaining to the Commissioners the current status of marijuana in the City and the state changes in the law. • A moratorium on new medical marijuana uses (unlicensed marijuana uses) was established by the City Council en Dec. 9, 2014. • A moratorium on new marijuana uses licensed by the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board (WSLCB) was established by the City Council on Oct. 6, 2015. • Both moratoriums require the City to develop appropriate local regulations giving effect to the 2015 State Legislative amendments. City zoning and buffer restrictions cn recreational marijuana were adopter! July 2014: • Production permitted in heavy and light industrial zones — indoor and outdoor, indoor growing permitted in Regional Commercial and Community Commercial. • Processing permitted in heavy and Tight industrial zones — packaging and extraction; packaging and labeling only allowed in Regional Commercial and Community Commercial.. • Local buffers for production and processing -- cannot be Iocated within 1,000 feet of City Hall, CenterPlace, vacant City property, vacant library property and vacant school property. • Retail sales permitted in Mixed Use Center, Corridor Mixed Use, Regional Commercial, and Community Commercial. 10.22-15 Planning Commission Minutes Page 1 ct 5 • Local buffers for retail sales — cannot be located evithiti 1,000 feet of City Hall, CenterPlace, vacant City property, vacant library property and vacant scktoot property, the Appleway Trail and theCentennial Trail, Prior to 2015 there were two different regulatory schemes for recreational marijuana and medical marijuana. • Recreational Marijuana (Initiative 502), evdified primarily in chapter 69,50 RCW. a I-502 passed in Nov. 2012. o Decriminalized possession and use. o Established a regulatory system for the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board (WSLCB) to license producers, processors and retailers of recreational marijuana. o August 29, 2013: US Dept of Justice issued its response to I-502, stating no prosecution in States with legalized marijuana if there are strong regulatory systems on paper and in practice. The federal government still considers marijuana a Schedule I controlled substance. o Possession and use of marijuana legal for people over 21 years of age o WSLCB went through extensive rulemaking pro: est in 2013 and began issuing licenses far production and processing in Spring of 2014, issued first retail license in July of2014, o There are three types of marijuana licenses: Producer — indoor and outdoor growing, Processor pulling marijuana into useable form, e.g.: packaging making marijuana extract and using it in edibles or as a concentrate. Retailer — a person licensed by the WSLCB to sell useable marijuana, marijuana -infused products, and marijuana concentrates in a retail outlet. o WSLCB rules prohibit any state licensed marijuana facility from being within 1,000 feet of the perimeter of any elementaper or secondary school, playground, recreation center or facility, child care center, public park (excluding trails), public transit center, library, or game arcade open to persons under the age of 21, this is administered solely by the state through the state licensing process, • Medical Marijuana — codified in chapter 69.51 A RCW. o Originally approved by initiative in 1998- o Amendments in 2011 resulted in confusion, lack of regulation, and left collective gardens as means of producing and procuring medical marijuana. • City issued business registrations for collectives, provided the collective garden was located in zone where retail sales were appropriate. There were no medical marijuana specific regulations at that time. Reconciling Medical and Recreational Marijuana -2015 Legislation. • State Legislature passed bills to reconcile medical and recreational marijuana markets • Maintains same licensing system through WSLCB • Adds "medical marijuana endorsement" for licensed retail stores. allows licensed retailer to sell medicinal marijuana to qualified patients and designated providers: qualified patients and designated providers may receive an exemption from the State's marijuana tax. • Eliminates collective gardens effective July 1, 2016. • Establishes cooperatives, which consist of up to four patients. Tile, neee 1 : in a Jrmitif. cannot be located within one mile of licensed retailer, must be re,* _.:r. _l v ia:: I.lry may contain up to a maximum of 60 plants. • Specifically allows cities to prohibit cooperatives. • Cities may reduce the buffers to 100 feet, except around schools and playgreerick - • Establishes transportation license. 10-2245 Planning Conmisslon Minutes • Establishes research license. • Allows qualified patients to grow up to 15 plants per housing unit. • WSLCR must increase number cf allocated retail locations to accommodate medical marijuana needs, fiscal note estimated 400 additional retail stores, but the number will be determined later. • WSLCB issued emergency rules effective Sept. 23, 2015: c Specified WSLCB would begin accepting retail license applications en Oct. 12, 2015 o Specified the total number of retail stores would be set at a later date o Specified maximum production space would be set at a later date • WSLCB concurrently issued draft rules at the same time as emergency rules, which will go through the public process and will be adopted in late 2015/early 2016: o Also specified the total number of retail stores and max. production space would be set at later date, o Specifies priority in which retail applicants will be licensed. o Set rules for applying for, receiving and maintaining medieal marijuana endorsement. r� Set rules for applying for, receiving and m aint aining a transportation license. o Set rules for cooperatives, which must register with WS LCB. Mr. Lamb stated the nroratcriums direct the City to develop regulations. Staff discussed possible options with the City Council on August 18, 2015, at which time Council indicated a desire to limit further retail stores, possibility with a buffer between stores rather than outright prohibition. Council also discussed limiting cooperatives. Mr, Lamb explained staff would like to discuss with the Planning Commission what their thoughts are for possible apticns to changing the marijuana regulations before they brought forward any proposed changes. It was also suggested if the Commissioners would like to hear from the public before making any decisions it would he possible to have a public comment session where the Commissioners could talk to people regarding the subject before. The Commissioners agreed they would like to do that and have a presentation from the police department as well as the fire department. Commissioners asked Mr. Lamb several questions in regard to marijuana regulations, either in the City or state. Current retailers will be able to get a medical endorsement. The moratoriums did not affect any of the current businesses. Because of the way the medical dispensaries were brought into existence, it is difficult to say how many there are currently, however based on the new laws, if they cannot be converted to a retail shop with a medical endorsement they must stop operations by July 1, 2016. Although the state has said it will later determine how many more additional retail shops it will allow, previously the original number was determined by a population allocation calculation by the Office of Financial Management. In the initial allocation Spokane County was allowed 18 retail. stores, the City was allowed three. Mr. Lamb felt the state would probably turn to something similar to this to determine a limit in the future. The Commissioners discussed individual medical patients. 1 -low many marijuana patients are allowed to grow for themselves, up to l5 plants per person, they must not pose a nuisance for the neighbors (sight, height, smell). Were landlords allowed to restrict growing on their property, it would be up to the landlord to enforce the terms of a ease, which would be a civil matter between the two parties. In regard to processing the marijuana, chemical proeessing is not allowed in some of our less intense zones because of the processes used to extract the THC. Some processes can be dangerous which is why they are not allowed in the less intense zones. The extracted THC can then be used in edibles or in other concentrated forms. Commissioners asked if the Health Department inspected the processing ©f the food made with marijuana. The Department of Agriculture is the agency overseeing food preparation. There was a question if there was a limit on how many cooperative$ there could be. There is not, but they do have some limitations. They can only consist of a rria'irnum of four qualified patients, must he in a domicile, the patient must have the medical authcariratioe It:rsr, a doctor, and they must register with the WSLCB. 10.22-15 Planning Commission Minutes Page3 of 5 To generate further discussion, staff brought up tin possible directions the ? ttions could take. Option 1) Ivlaintttin existing regulations • Add definitions regarding retail stores t4•it'i mtiiedical endoisenieiit • Allow cooperatives • Clarify permitting requirements for any modifications for home grci.vs • Would allow 727 parcels for retail, though not all available due to market and existing ether commercial uses Option 2) Additional regulations • Additional buffer, the possibilities could be 1,000 feet from retail store use. this results in 61 allowable parcels • Additional buffer could be 1;004 feet from a residential zone • Limit allowable zones • Overlay, limit areas where allowed, e.g. just along west Sprague area • Limit or prohibit cooperatives • Clarify permitting requirements for any modifications for home grows Option 3) Prohibition • All license types or just particular ones e.g. ban retail but allow production or processing • Cooperatives • Clarify permitting requirements for any modifications for home grows • Potential issues with challenges, ongoing appellate cases, with no decisions yet, so result is uncertain Under all options, existing licensed stores become legal nonconforming uses to the extent they may not comply with the new regulations. Commissioner Anderson stated he had come up with another option. 1 -le said he felt recreational use of marijuana was going to stay_ He said he felt medical marijuana will not be allowed to be blocked by cities, his goal would be to have the minimum number of retail Outlets as allowed bV law, to control the co-ops, and eliminate processing other than growing in any residential facility but not eliminate the availability of the infused products for medical purposes, Mr. Anderson offered the following as possible options for marijuana regulations. • Medical marijuana must be sold only at recreational retail outlets, maintain the existing retail outlets but require them to obtain a medical endorsement. • Maintain the current buffers, but possibility restrict under age people from entering the stores. • Allow cooperatives under the same zoning rules as recreational growers and with the state cooperative requirement that one must be an owner dale property. • Allow medical marijuana growing in private residence for personal use assuming approval is received from the property owner in the case of rented or leased facilities. • Do not allow any solvent extraction within any residence/domicile or property. • Require all infused product or concentrate to be purchased froth medicaifrecreational retail outlet. Commissioner Stoy suggested changing the allowable retail outlets to ten. There was a discussion regarding limiting the number of plants allowed in a residence to keep it below the number which would trigger a sprinkler system. It is possible that growing the plants could damage a home from the moisture required to grow them. The question carne tip as to how enforcement would work if you don't know who is growing. to any other licensed 10-2215 Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 ors The Commissioners came to a consensus they would like to take public input regarding this subject before making any suggestions about which way to go with the regulations. They would also like to have a presentation prior to the public input from the fire and police departments, as well as they would like to have input from the schools. Ms. Nickerson will also return with information about the restrictions for single family housing if purple want to grotiv in their homes. GOOD OF THE ORDER: There was nothing for the Good of the Order ADJOURNMENT: There being no other business the meeting was adjourned at 8:02 p.m. toy, Chairperson e: a Horton, Secretary Date signed 10-22-15 Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of5 CITY OF SPOL:ArslE VAILEV Request for Mar ninc Com mis:siott Action Meeting Date: Novlari1x21- 12, 2015 (tam Cheek all that apply: 0 consent 0 old business D public hearing E information admin. report FILE NUMI:WR: CTA -2015-0006 o new bwines$ ID pending legislation AGENDA 111.,N1 I 11 Slidv session — Corn nreliensi vo %.Iarijuana Ftegulations DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Providing An update and background on current iriarijnana lawsincluding recent 2015 State Legislative amendments and the City's cumin marijuana regulations. Discuss possible options for amendments to City iegtslat1ons. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCA' :36.70A.:06;, RCW 69,50 codifying Initiative 502); RCW 69.51A; SVMC [7.30.150ml I9.3O.O4O SVMC S'Vretr: 19.120.050 PREVIOUS. ACTION TAKEN; City Council 1111:4 rivr.lii Sly'V1C and SVMC 19.85 for the Zoning Jrd burfering 11.FirijIIPX.1. Dcccia..2r Council adopted a moratori urr CPP.mxi "JS.CS 0:1 6, 2015, City Council adopted a moratmiunt 011 :no ji..111:1,1 1icerna.1 Cannabis Board (IWSLCB''), Planning Cornrnis5l iii ober 22, 201c, BACKGROUND: The City is in Ii rot' '1 ev.Lopir ompreEen4.nv Ari.. our. ons, as required pursuant lo moratoriums cieNcrihml chw. The Piinc. Cornini,s1, F, study 1- ., session on October 22, 216[5 and requested to take public tommulit ;Lidon - Po/ice and Spokane Volley Fire before deliberating and deveinpiaL2. ; Commissior vb.111 take public comment on 1.4oventber 12, 2015. Spo:.'.or1o. t.'0:et, and Spokane Valley Fire will present information at Planning Commission's Decernbcr ;"!.11 mooting. Mforonveionfroor WSLCB, Since October 22, 2615, the r..,-.,!..2.(1 some ackEtional infontation regarding, its ongoing rulemaking process. First, .`•.t indicated Li hr.-; bcen .iNorking with a consultant to determine tke appropriate number of additional retail stoit•t-i. l.)4„ith jLifl5dictL�Tt- by-jurisdi.tior Ilte NV,SLCB anticipates having the nuinbers by 1,...l.,..11.,e(rporeited into the proposed rules. Thus, while the proposed rules currently prcivitit an •.11.;..:•tint ddertilined later, by adoption there Will be either a set amount or rpcthoc1310.0. ••]Ic vAnu. number will be allocated by the State as was done in the first rot.r.d of . [. I once the rules arc adopted with the increased ittimber of retal L;ic !ic,Inse that ni.mbor of additional stores, reuarcit fie numbe: yIid, As of',...yeember 2, 2015, :i 1d rcc2ivcc1 100 V4IT 7 i1,1 cLirinr. its frow PiaPue;N:,.; frs Oc-tolior 22 201!q ' 131r wi 11 r_4;. :It Lb 2 Ncvuirluzi 201.5 me oOno ismie that hos b.cun braiught tu stairs attterirititt since the October was clarification on what the van'iatis terms nitii': - specifically "r::71}c iye— k°L'r;iis "medical dispensary'" Vi rSUUS `'Cooperative" versos medical marijuana store. e,a Lioii ir. a Lein that was originally in chapter RCW fi II referrcc! to a group of 10 ur.ltti d ptuie;:tti tit llt5 could grow and distribute marijuana amongst tktr:irt However. there were no restrictions on the how patients could enter or lent the a:tillcetive. atnd sa in nianyy cases they tieveJope d into de 1'apto dispensaries. A medical marijuana dispensary was contemplated in 301 I. by the Slate, but ultimately vetoed by the Governor. Accordingly, a medical i i rijt.ana dispensary is not a legal use under chapter 69.51A. 1T ouult technically collectives were the means under cIi tpter 69.51A RCW for patients to obtain medical rntlrijrr:tna (outside of growing it themselves), the tcri:is "collective," "dispensary," and "medical ntarijttana store," are often used interchangeably to refer to the existing medical mari[Liana collectives ht operation Rettardless of term, all such unliconsed medical marijuana uses mast cease operations as 3' July I, 2415.. Auer that time, only (1) licensed recoil stores and .;2) registered cooperatives will be allowed to continue to operate. A new medical marijuana store is simply a licensed rciail store that obtains its medical rmarijuann endorsement, where it imwv'heal sell rnuediCal marijuana to patient=. tax-er;empt. A cooperative is a completely new term (}° t refers to a group of up to .our patient wuhn cache together to grow marijuana for elems elves only. They cannot sell or distribute the tnarijtrr3na they grow to anyone other than tau four patteirls in the. Coope :tt va. They may only have, a cooperative in a domicile and cannot be located within one mile ufa licensed retail facility. Car purposes olcomparison, most likely retail stores ttith medical marijuana endorsements wilt be the most likely analog use to today'ollccti • s" Or -dispensaries". Options Cry Rc.gulatin?r Options Planning Ccrtnmission May K.:Vnsid2r a range of options For the C!ty. Tilti.. option.; rarrge front ma niain;jw.. current riegulatians to adopting some further limitaiticits ..that .epotr1Ci ;.1I,.e,. a •ill ii •rl its-.r.:l iii :i•_l:nsxd marijuana uses) to a dopL?n.g a ban on additional licensed itwrijuart: concepts to CIry i= tiuelt'.k ,v irs August 18 2015, in,2e ing. Outing that meeting, C xtitrcil indicates! a dc:!,.ire restrict marijuana uses to their Current levels or Ra• ;n;nimize increasing the x,!nil,.-.71. of steres, law would likely preclude the City from cxpreSsly seetti iL file ntirn.ier ofstores t .:),L7 ;, ciciIlt2 I V:1111-11 tIrr' C'ii nut the City may adopt reasonable lard use regulations governing the siting and Iu.- ui.?n One option Council discussed was possibly including an adc'itional lxrai't;r prev:ntin� retail ,steer€.; h.ont locating within 1.000 feet or any tither licensed use. Oprrcui f- Rely on existing rc {ulations. This apprioach would Leave the D ist nT City- regi�l.,°its:rr in place to deal with any additional retail, production, and processing licere s. Lnt'.er rh' Planing Commission should consider whether there should be any additional rcgulrili(Hi r ,e.lt)�ra:ri'.e3 °�ti'11iGkt can only be located in residcn:ial zones) This would alloiw a potential ioc:.rea;0 number of::a°l, production, and processing stores within the existing zones uric subject .ar ;, svraild ultimately be seer Igy the State. Under this option, staff would rccornmeuc irinor enai,tL4L•i; :;~<isting definitions to account for rattail stores with medical marijuana cndorsomc-iis. _.hiderlilis:rfrtic�rr, tlicp:: arc 727 available parcels for 'eta] stores_ 1•Cta ".ever, not all are available dui: tri r!raiket constrain, acid other commercial operatiritts thtrt talcs tip a significant number of those parcels. Option 2- Adopt additional Eirnita[ioris. suc:i :is bathers between licensed uKtrilutma,scs, rirolcil-,ti,: cooperatives, or further limiting the allow ble zones where liceased it PJanr,in,g tromrnissiora wisi~ed to i'urther lirtiit stores, ii could adept a 1,0OO fns l .:ii': r s itt°-ti, t lie;ns:d retail scores and all other licensed marijuana uses. 'l his wi.auld limit the numl1:T4': I'r.r :al ;l: i7;: !* :a C.,]. However, this does not take into account any existing commercial steres aar_c.- i.;; ;I r" ;°. °.ir.. rl nr otly.tr market -factor limits on those parcels. Pitt -they, since there are licensed stores and clue to potential nuisance -type impacts on neighborhoods, Planning Commission could consider prohibiting cooperatives (home ;rows of up to bit plants). Licensed marijuana uses Lire currently allowed in four zones — CUP, MUC, RC, and C. This could be further restricted to limit the: areas where additional licensed strops could Locate by either reducing, the available zo:ies or adepring an overlay zone Lit -railing where licensed marijuana may be Lovated. existing stores that might otherwise be impacted by any new regulations would become legal non -conforming rises and so would rat be adversely impacted. 0priorr 3: Adopt e prohibition on sone or all types of licensrd marijuana uses. Existing licensed uses would become legal non -conforming uses and so would not be required t'. stop operations. I`tow-ever, a prohibition would prevent arty additional licenseduses. Notes that ',sidle staff believes a prohibition is valid, there have ben no appellate court deoisiens validating a city's authority to ban licensed marijuana uses, and so staff cartnot definitively state what a court ratty do if the City were challenged on a prohibition. Option 4 (prow ted at ()ember 22 orating): • Allover only minimurll number required by lay. • medical marijuana must be sold only at recreatioival ;etaii outlets, maintain tl,:: :: tin,- retail outlets but re:quiriz them to obtain a medical endorsement. • Maintain the current buffers, but possibility restrict under age people iron enteric Et i;),• • Allo�n- caoperat.ves under the same zoning rules as recreational growers and i:li the state cooperative requirement that one !nay only have a cooperative is: a domicile. • Allow medical marijuana growing in private residence for personal nal use 1•:;tatii:t_: .;71:1L7',11 is received from the properly owner in this case of noted or lee -eel i tr,il iti t ti. • ❑tl riot alloity any solvent extraction within any ICS t{ lira tacitchile Lir prep:rty. • Require all infused product cr concentrate to be purchased from medical/recr_;tti.-r-T L retail n:itict. A. cope, 00he proposal is provided as pan of this pac,kcr_ GcncE.:d ititernl,ll:c,n regarding the background actions by the City and state law requirements are rrr� i,ir.rl i:`. he RFCA from the October 222. 2{115 meeting, which is attacired, Ol'1(11.: Noticc of the opportunity for public comment was provided through a publication in the the City's website, by media release, and by distribution through the Planning ?_ }nuc, •aIii clistriiautierl liiyr I~urthur; staff=visaed known industry advocates and citizen groups the opportunity to provide public comment. r�.l'l'Idi.)l'r11. CRiT'l!,RIA,: SV MC Section 17.20.150(F) provides approval criteria for text 3rlertdri to rhe Svtt•',c. The criterion stipulates that the proposed amendmertt[s) roust he consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plaza and 'near a substantial ro]a:icn to the public health. safety, welfare, and protection of the environment, RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Staff is. seekirlq Planning Commission devclupu wnc of and consensus on: an option. Once an option is davcloped and approved in concept, staff will draft appropriate proposal amendments based up I ibat concept for further Maiming Commission consideration. STAFF CONTACT: Christina Jriii - Pial Jenny Nitlurson EI tans Exam i ncr Erik Lamb — Deputy City Ammo)/ ATTACHMENTS: A, Presentation 13, Ploposal *oil- 1 oroi )1,-jon.ur An, C, Copy u j 112111 I D. Map ofexIstino APPROVED Minutes Spol-tane Valley Planning Commission Council Omni hers - City Holl, November 12,2i115 1t.rirnaarl Aricior,on called the mc2tir.g to order at 6:1X4 p,m. Commissioners, stair and audience stood For •lir: pledge. c-.I'atl.egirnnce, Iris. Beath! tank roll and the Following members. and stafTwcre present: exctisccl Erik Cramb. Deputy City Attorney Lori D rie , Scnior Planner Jenny Nick Jrson, Sr, Plains Examiner Chtistina _Lannert, rimier Kanctt Kendall, Plun:tcr Elisha hl4:atli. So'_r_r,:: e, ti c :•rai.5i -•1} i.M".!, lf;j!r!•. ,? j II iLI e.Yc:rsedfrom the ,Vol f.';i:'ii-, dO Cdi r;''!:1., (he amended November 12. .20 :ir lt.Fl. {!.'` !i!''.: .ice':.. ivrt n of:L..; rhe motion passes Wood' i,:cwt?d to accept the October 22. 2015 rrrhrrrrces as presented. Commissioner Scott Fa•!-ected the ;' rcft'ss otr page fire, line three to acid the words card "school rli.srricis Commissioner ! ri'LJ .,c;n' r,rr ,Net to accept the corivetedmrinutes from fOctobttr 22, 2015. The vote on ilre mwiian was six in ;[, r'ur, zero Jt?oik t,Hr,ses. COOMMISSION REPORTS: Commissioners had nothing to report.. I}MINISTRATIIVE REPORT: Senior !=Tanner Loi Barlow reputed that the City Council determined ",I: tt they would be appointing the new Planning. Commissioners at the liar rgzular City Council meeting in! Januay rather t.lmn the Danninbcr meeting. Asa result there will not be za 1'Iannins2 Cnrnrnission aneet.ing January 14. 2016. ranc the January 28, 2016 mating will be Et 'raining meeting iu +1rd -r ki bri::g the new Planning Co rnutiis;iutt fllelnbers up to speed. Ms Barlow stated that the al ta.:al Comprehensive Plan Cycle was opened and one amendment request was received. The Docket Ito; been pre4ented w the City Council For approval. The Planning Commission will likely begin its review cycle in 1:c•-3ruar . She also gave an update on the population :allocation PTAC prnc ss for the Comprehensive Lion UpJate, The Steering Conulaittee of' Elected Officials met on November 4i'' and forwarded the Spokane Courtly Planning Technical .Advisory Committees reco mnendatiou to the Board of County Commissioners- Tlie reeotr uncrrdation was to use Office of Financial Management's medium range population f'vrceeisl fear the 21 -year planning period. PUBLIC COMMENT: No public comments. COMMISSION BUSINESS: Study Session= STV -2015-000I, street v-acation of 3' Avenue Planner Karen Kendakt presented the street vacation request of 3`I Avenue located between Appleway Trail and 4' Avenue just west of Skip -word] Rci; d adjacent to six parcels. The request is for an area approximately 34C feet in leragttli and ranging in tv idth from 40 to 50 feet, Thr northerly three parcels are proposed to he consolidated into one. South of 3' Avenue the two weltsr1y parcels will be consolidated into one and access will be by an existing easement from 4'1' Avenin. The final remaining parcel will be unchanged. Ms. Kendall presented five reasons identified by the applicant for the request 1. The area proposed to be vacated is unimproved and not maintained 2. Location of road limits maximum tiso of abutting properties 3. All six parcels abutting 31`1 Avenue (northtsouth) etre owned by the same property owner 4. The stntctut-es along the west property line hinder future right of way connection 5, No parcels lure 3'd Avenue for access, k 1 -k? -t5 P1a.rtrtirtg Carnmission 1.1inulws Kap 1 or The Pub. he Hearing date i,s set rot December I. 0, 2015. commissioner Ander. ,i asked 'if the process filr changing the fat lines was already underway, crnd if they 1 r','r'e° got rhea, why The Iwo pr racc_s rcr', chaaging the tot Pins and the street vacation, were not eaot rrc,'tcrrl Siniuflartcawl{y. Ms. Ken da',I e`cplaitLcd that not knowing how the pareelw are going to end up and that this application has six pare:ets. there. is potential for a parcel to beJecmc land locked and we da not runt that to happen. The property owner has presented how he would orient tl'.; parcels so that all of them would have direct access to a public sL1tet, Currently, the parcels are not proposed to be c ,[soli 1nicd ur adjusted. Thitt will be proposed going, forward at ;lte time 4-1. the street vacation is beim: finalized. Typically, the lot linin adjttsrrcnt is handled by the record c51 sun ew ih,it lira rliruti the titI°tre:t vacation'. Commissioner Anderson asked flare CJky can ptouruc_' ,I l•'i:;ll?r .-00:1 or: i.' I 2 fr1r.'i c'.',.712tYi h'1. Ms. Kendall replied that it is an existing easement that does provide legal access to cul existing home, `float easement will not change- Coprrrrrissioner Plriliip,s stated that it did nrir make 5't.'f LSI! trt gC11 roc' qf VIVO al,hem! One parce! he ra'1r,`rr'! fit a 12 jraat easerneJ7r, He asked what the J i'1 r r ' ti�'` r ;r. "f' I.;fr; !%,:' r.roPertY. stated that the property owner has not dig use of the ircperty. Ili ad:liiiort site clarified that the ea,RcI:i4'-"t°. l: :, I F..:41 .i Ila.: '.. i Jr!! tiiir7t[''...2' serves aS access foi- n -. ':idence. The two parcels will be La:•111 i,r1•:'. ` 1 ,. ti 1111 'I i i6 a:. 1' Is4iia_ 1 -Ai 7 l,I_r! 1•-I 1 the 12 foot CLl',12111',:i0 :i access. Cfao..a; r'r. klner Stott asked if the Crfy :.`herr gets il'l,en it uacaies right of wu4.. K.:21-0.12,11 stated that the City Council mould determine what they would like to do for compensation of the v1CaLian fthe Street_ ('+'Irrrrrrissioner .Andersrm asked if ROW is not ri-srti .4+' the C fl+ rr rtci ria lru. !+I !!1 c' F'! rip,:rev fU i ►!{'r. f,.17. 'Lamb stated there is a provision for plan, l:'I.i'.l'_i. 1903 tl;.-'il.':1t :51 5•;.'f ;li',I 1:;•C t ,11111 11 °I it Avert bark to the owner. For all other rf'CIiL —Cil-wjy, '.h rll'11'-i"°t-'., ]`.' 1'L'[al::lrl t i. ;IA' .1;7,' if 1I , (iperi or riot. COMM c:...c.la e • c rahain asked rthotrt the access fcrr- rr•, three- r': rr : c'r,• ir. ,. < r1, !"lir, iMs. ...:,C1< II ;i:ii,.:tl 'heli the property' ov.r:er lids spoken with the Developr,lt:1.: provided rot. [`.:111,:L s traveling down Skipl!'otth I::, ;!11. 11 is ...Yid: dedication R.:7. chicles to turn around, and it wou:d 1 c 15ai11Lic. C"fXiritrar :°rrsritr' Graliain Cakef;' 11 r;rr+ct Web' (1,..) .'.yarn'['.! 1'01.14,7P-0';7ri' + f",4 Mil;: ;V15• 1<_CII,L:.l:,Lr,,It [hal11 "'1'.Ir.,h ;.,I1r�11rm ii '.[1��f1 .,`.\-if:ler t. e1'. fr "f :r.'. i.. A._'{'/ #''..ri' fire ;../4-rrrrr.+. .. 11i. Kcndu11 ,-2I:irii-wd the lin s14: �:: :a �•J:r .:Ilii:°1'�r l''1e.1• '.,chicic-t- `I 1114_ .'Ill :1 .111 ': Re' w I.1!11'I L1.r1>I,1,c.i1Ls;1; the: i„,roceA i,',;:Ifr,�+'ri1!,. lc1,1:1rri:mil. (ioe:i l �`[ 1, i. or-! 1.2(1: Y 1'C'C�rU+•f1 rrr�'i �,'i . 1fJJ- r`! Or' rt'J1Z". 1'. Ir+f'r:.tif Irl and 1t_ci;te: IIII'cii;-114 1.,r ;1 .I'Licr1Liun end 11 c 61 6:.• ("1.A-211 1 Otho n 741.iriiiian a I2.e2lel<lt'ions Alio Il, l' Erik _..!1111: . ;:;IIB tl 1 ,_.'.Iii1' ex;7L11Si#1L' ICi ih ~ C.f]rriui tori ".i ih c ciLrrcnC St;!tli3 .,'1 Ir,LI:iirulii:l Ai Ilk! Cit' nr-.{1 !I-• ▪ A li:,..'r.uoruJiii ctrl !I1..;di ..7.1 itmttrijuana u.,i :: (unlicensed marijuana uses) was established by the City C ou:..' :1 ' r.: >cc. 9, N1141, • A Ir$1r,riorl;Jrr1 loll new marijuana uses licensed by the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Ri,Irr: c 5:4' I C13) wa established by the City Council on Oet, G, 20:5. 13.711, 1 1 , +t:'1 niters require the City m develop appropriate local regulations giving, effect to the �.1 • = t,lt< 1.4::=illative amendments. 4r$0l'd Cr clan:6)4,17g ifue 'tkrnr o 7 tilt.' tno7'ctoriwn cu' crew uteri jr it7120 Wes licenses r;',:rt Q ilrlecl 111 ! �ir.'5°r currently llcerrses recrcatr'crrra! marijtrati i shops and crrr•rerrth licensed Jrrr tr':ti.,,1 rf:_rr j:rera'Ja sfira;;., ,++,;rrr applying for a medico! marijuana errdrat'. eJitcml Mr. Lamb stated the i''spl'lri na Coralmtssion `.i:Irutes rage f of 9 moratorium will. prohibit any new licenses from sontcotte who ct:rrently does not have a license. Far the current Three retail stores, the maratoriurt will not affect their seeking a medical marijuana ends rsernertt. The WSLCB will trot be isseing those endorsements until July 312016, Mr. Lamb presented the geestions posed at the October 22, 2015 meeting: Couto we require individuntl qualified patients ei license or register with the City? The full legal review has not been completed, however there appears there arc scverti problems presented with this: HIP PA requirements, which requires the City to keep chat information confidential and private which does against our mandate, under the public records act. to he a transparent government. Secondly, there could bc some preemption issues given how the state has set out ilia law for patients tar be gealifed patients and receive their authorizations. Filially, there are cenccrnw from a Fifth Amendment standpoiat, irr terms of requiring a patient to register icor what is still illegal under federal law. Requiring patients to notify landlords Again it raises similar issues, with the Fifth Amendment. It also would be difficult from an aiif+,src r„�,rt strrndpiaiirt. It reaa.Ily is a private issue and the landlord would be able to pursue that thele;*: thcir.vc3intract with i[2 tenant. Cairlarrisrrorrcr Graham .fie.atfr rr fitr aj ra cooperative bad to have a signed deeicralied from the tc-m.010rri. Mr. 1_,:ea e tItat when using the term patients he is referr.tig to individuals. Commissioner :hid: a :,.r : ,i::.r;. R:.' ;°4r was on issue virlt lclrrdlnrds plating.stip7t?citrons within their contracts to be ..fro*iaag or rrandrfy rag lftC r sfrlettce_ or growing. Mr. Lamb stated that he is not aware E-' ii Lk landlords are not his clients and he is not able to give them legal advice, Clarification rrcgardirrt terns used for medical marijuana., kiediaal collective, medical dispensary, and rneetica; shop all refer to an unlicensed medical facility, under prior RCW 69.51A, A dispensary was originally slated to be a legal use back in 2011, however the state through the Governor's veto eliminated the "diepensary_" Medical collectives, are a grrrttp or 10 patients coming together and growing the marijuana amongst those 10 patients Fur the same 11} patients. From a practical standpoint, since there is no ettforccuu rot of those cellactives, marc f shags nisi npomo as do facto dispensaries. The City has riot regulated them or looked at them and treats them a: collectives. Those are the unlicensed medical shops that we had register prior to our ntoratorittnt, •wc do not know how many are iri operation now, those are the ones war) will be seeking the license from i4'SLCI3 to become a retail shop. A cooperative i5 a group of people taking the place of the collective. They are required to be in a domicile..A eaciperativc is up to four qualified patien:4 corning, together tr grow marijuana themselves. Cooperalivae are required to be registered with the WSLCB but they do not obtain a license and they are FIN a retail shop. Only allow medical marijuana? Preemption will prevent the City from breaking this up into medical and retail, The licertssc that is obtained is a retail license. it: is solely up to the owner if they wish to seek the medical endorsement.. Thu question was raised can the City require a location early sell recreational or medical snarijualt;r. Mr. Land) stated that the challenge would he there is no requirement at the stator level that a shop bc just a medical sloop or just a recreational shop. Commissioner Scott rrxkecl if to City cora be Stricter than rice Dote, Mr. Lamb Slated that the City can enact laws that are riot in conflict -wills the state laws. Front a land use standpoint the City cors determine where land users are appropriate, coning and buffering requirements for marijuana. From a licensing standpoint and the products a shop is selling is a highly regulated State activity, Mr. Lamb presented that there are Outer types of uies that the City coli In want to regulate for example a marijuana club. Currently. there is one considered a 420 friendly lot ngc where you are able to consume marijuana but not purchase marijuana. Discussion returned to the collective and medial dispensary. Mr. Lamb explanted that some up.! under the definition of collective since they are taking a donation from a rnemher. Others have expanded and operate ELS rt business. Between 2013 and 2014 fifteen business licenses Ltd listed services for medical marijuana. However, that does not include these who applied under t.it;i i viva. medicine. If they do not get their license by July 2016 it does become an illegal ,aciivit W:.1.(.73 1 1.1 —1 i Hurling Commission Minutes 3 d Lt stated in rr wsbinar that they will not be in the enforcement business against those unlicensed collectives or dispensaries. it will be upto the Ioca1 1eue1 Jnr' natifcatian or policing. Coarrrrfixsirarter Grethen asked about ale consult= retrurred by the WSLCB to be present t (.? loPed?cat endorsed retail shopx, that the regulations for !hem would ,Jul be available tile' Jut' 1. 2(;16- Mr. Lamb slated that he would have to research that further and that the Stag is working with the Department of Health ort those regulations. Corrtrnissioner Anderror marked f the Cily had banned recreational marijuana a lrc!,,. {,<- rcday an the subject of medical N?u l:tha is? Mr. Lamb staged that we would be in a s;r iLar terms of defining terminology, co one wouId he able to obtain a marijuana license, sea ,+'0001d 11,e no marijuana. (Discussion from the Commission turned to the City choosing to Inose ahead 1t'iib i ,nii'z 1;0 new liccrwsing, what issues the City would face with rrredital marijuana. The existinj,t stores only entities that w a:ld be able to apply l'or th+ rrv4diCA1 endorsement. Under 11iis 0:dir4n rnl.ili::al dispensaries would not be able to (rbtaiii ti license within the City and would another city or county. Cormmissioner Graham clarified that the cooperatives would nil, 1111%2.2 t:, leave, since they are for private patients in a domicile. Mr. Lamb stated that is u distinction that could be made, the cooperatives are called out in the State law in terms of a city zoni'r., aridup to prohibiting. Mr. Lamb presented information from rhe WSLCf on the process they are undcrtakinu 'u determine i he number of retail locations. One of the primary things the WSLCf3 ,11'4 Wu rt:itl. wvith a consultant to determine elle: approl:•rialte +1llmher of r t:.;il :IE1res. 'They IcIC i. •,s: ; ,Inks i .,hrl ::. get the lice.-n5ing process going, which is why t1ley 1, 114 i up the Cctobcr 12. 2i1l:; However, similar to how they did before rap•tilauciin number for retail stores for the statewic.e: bt'; ccn clowni:, nnh ;. nl ire in ":he Hopefully will be detaniiiiitd by December. Based inn that WC :. submitted, however, a\,liatcver number the \'SLCS .i t _dial is 1'h. II Mr. Lamb continued with the presentation on the bickgrouw. 01, -V11111 it lla + City zoning and buffer restrictions on recreational marijuana o Adopted in July 201,1 o Applied to licensed retailers, producers. aril I,at:Less:7r o Have used for siting of 19 producers, 21 prerccssurs. alr. 3 rel li!e!� o Note that previously State limit ct (:i.ty" to 3 rt' ailur kLyti'.4" khl':IsllOa` I; l3alll,",fir C.11a.:l ti • Marijuana Production: Permitted iri iheavy and lii:jit indus;ri,11 feriae:. u„t1'i'�I1. 1 11 I till1 an,l outdoor); permitted in limited iiianner (inuothh s,rt' i!hL only in ILC aid :).511.0s. + Marijuana Processing; Permitted in !heavy ancl i:idusCrial extraction); perilhircd in Iiinited manner i;15,1,1t rijii ir,,, RC and C zones. • Local buffers for both marijuana produutit't1 w).; , 1':l r:,siru=: 4:tn1mq+1 ht 10.:atcci wk it l:i:t 1,000 fcct of City Hall, CcnterPlacc, vacant City prof- (c 1her than wtor:nwat.:r and public Ci4111-ot-i.vay}, vacant library propeity,, and vacant school property. Retail sales: permitted in the Mixed Uise Center, Corridor Mixed Use, l{cgional Commercial, and Cumin LI111i ly Cutat]h72;Cjai zones. • Matra! ti af1L1-s for 1't! it rte. c.mi ni l: Cc,c;ated within 1.1100 fc:t of City Hall. CcriteiPlcL:I, vac:inn. t.l'.'' ly:`fiptilt:+ ii,k I 'h' :hdri 6i ....Ihl1ti":'!IL:' :IIid public illt.i'-:.' vacant school propel -t;', t1l� l?p1u,4.1y .l`r.yi I. t'c•,tanni•i1 1 r:iiL Christina Janssen, Planner presented the options ,lir I, Op'k'ii 1) Maintain L'ki cin',_ rt"!ulaltiU'ns • •del retail stories with reed `iiI endorsement 11-12-13, ' u,ir.;^ n.r uu.:iy r. ilii items �•..11I'.. t-_il .an' Lw'ak17 the rcgiliarioiii, • Allow cnu.r1 Lratives • Clarify pcIYi1YT'II`.!" I'::lLIIR:'T"e 1 l;ir crny Y_-.i:i:llli`.:lti0it5 ti`I I1!kr1YC • 41.'ptrld allow 72J rut: Lk hi Itvt::i It'111rI1 AO... ,ill ;nail m:IIk. rind kis.iri otltwr' commercial uses Option 2) Additional regulations • Additional l)llfThr. the passtilrlitlti-• w:.x';]:1 kir use, this results in 61 allowable l).lrr-u Iti • Additional buffer could be 1,Qtil! feet from a residential zoite • limit allowable zones • Overlay, limit areas wheve allowed, el. just along wet Sprague urea • Limit or prohibit cooperatives • Clarify permitting requiremen's for arty modifications for horns: grows Option 3) Prohibition • All .i[mrise types or just particular Cgs e.g. ban retail but allow production or' processing ▪ Cooperatives • Clarify permitting requirements for any modifications for horse grows • Potential issues with eliallenge.s, laligoin appellate cases, with no decisions yet, so result is uncertain Option 4) Provided at the October 22, N13 rnectinp. • Allow minimum aunrbr:rrequired by law • iedicsl sold at retail outlets — existing ti7re. oiY1al;n niett/caI endorsement • Maintain current buffers, possibly restrict under age • Allow cooperatives but only in same zones its producers • Allow qualified patients le Thome grown, assuming approval from the property owner if a rented or teased property • No solvent extraction within any residlerrce/'dutni_ile • Require all infused prodael. or concentrate to be pal chased from a retail snare Discussion on the tax bersctits of having a rota proL: ssing facility and prcductittn facility in the City. Mr, Lamb slated that the City does not see much ui lax revenue from the processing or production facilities since they are wholesale, The retail storc the City ,'eccive die standard sales tax, the additional benefit is a portion ot"the thirty-seven percent tax imposed by the State. Public Comment: Marilyn Miller, 2124 S. Harold Road: Ms Miller stated the was new to Planning Commission meetings, and ttniess your w•.'a1i to work on this till the end of your lives which you would if you adapt option 1, ? or 3. 1 think prohibition is the best way Logo. i do not believe you are going to i,c denying any patients the right or ability to get their medical marijuana, Time is access in very close localities. 1 don't think Spokane Valley needs Io indulge in this. Tara Harrison, 513 N. Locust Riad: Ms. Harrison stated that she is the itatcrim admits far the Collation for Cannabis Standards and Ethics (CCSE). Her involvement with the CCSE , began last year when she was working for an unregulated medical marijuana dispensary. She realized there was a lack of einninurtic i1ion on this side of the Slate, Many business owners were unaware of the legislation that was ming, on. In efforts to close the cornmunica1ion and information gap she sought nut the CCSE, One projecr that they are working on is the Washington Cannabis Commission through the Department ak Agriculture. Ms. Harrison staled that while prohibition may soiirtd great, but no amount: of prohibition is going to keep drugs out of school.. Ms. Harrison stated that she is a mother of a child in a Valley School District. Fier child does witness drugs dealing at school each clay. The programs that are being utilized in school ata ineffective. She has taken the time as a parent to educate her child as to what is medicine and what is not and why. Her child is Rot interested in partaking, she sees it as a medicine. That is a parent's Pageof 4 11-I2•15 Planning Commission Mirulcs { responsibility and no one else's. Ms. Harrison st ted you have to teach your children. When it tomes to something like this, the real~ n Ibis. Harrison is involved abet ti,.hy it is so intportattl k the patients. The patients that she has meet tri the last two years leave imelted her lire ill a wvay she could never have imagined. Slie stated that she did not seek out this, carter, It Iicr ththcr could have had this option she may not Have lost hien at nitre. Tans °f her flintily hay!: ddie1 from cancer. she hes Mir people with that, theircaiiccr is gone. There are medical studies that prove thew, we know there is a very valid opportunity here. In order to hest take care ref public Itetiltll, whet is important to the City and how you want to reflect. ''L1 want to embrace the health, ofpeoplc, Not cvcrycnc has access to transportation, public transit is 5' 1iet they rely on. So having ate option for medical lmee in the Valley is very important. That may be their rily option.. Luckily with the way tealsiatien happens people do have, options. They can choose not to re istcr at all and pay extra taxes, they have the ability to gel '.he produets that the Department of Health .. ill not he overlooking. M5. Harrison stated that you can have a producer that ;.;rows medical and recreational in the future, the erawer curt state that he is or lv growing one: Strain, ones deemed medical o ic:s; deemed recreational. The one that is deemed medical under Mies inure testing and regulations. 1?;.:;:ei w have that is very, very important_ People are seeking this titre in droves, the people that Comte .is patients eighty percent are fifty-five plus. That means a lot, this is growing. need to embrace that this k happening, this is a movement. In my opinion it will be rescheduled in ten years: if we look at what's happening in the iutiirc and ~where this is going we are going to be left with rr: eratoriums trying to scramble tci pelt in regulations to keep the dangers away. That's all we want to keep th c.'en ;ars at hay. it's something that is new and fresh and people are scared. There is also very beautiful der; e-; heii e bent out of this and en turn a blind eve on it time you don't want to have anything to do with t of .:licit. We treed to take care of our city and our health and our wellbeing,. We make r? Hews, retake sure flint everything is pesticide tested, Laid you knew than right now our laws do not reel i Iitedicine on the reerreationaI shelves to be tested for pesticides? Tliat is appalling to me. As a City you may be utile to require that everything on the shelves within City limits is teeuired to have those e.rids of tests. Then yow; can boastabout liaw healthy and viable your city i5 because you are taking care erannd makinu sure:hat your City and the people are getting theee medicines. and that it is gtl.'aranteed to healthy mr;dicine. The tar benefits, public education, only three schools. 1 believe, ir. Spokane County ;rre receiving any kind of benefits for drug education and prevention. Three in the whole county -that's horrible. One of the tax bene Fits is to be able to give education and prevention to OW youth. it is very important that we do that. Ori the Moratorium. I understand why because of the unregulated businesses, there are a few businesses that have given the Valley a black cyc. Ms. Harrison staled that she trndeisturd why the moratorium exists. it is important that everyone followed the rules and goes by the b:1, When art eighty year old wwotnan walks in to get her medicine, she does not walk irttp something that she may get shat over. She doesit't need to walk in, not ror her reeds, she does not need to see someone hieing u bnngnr trimming their product on the table in front of ever:one in the lobby. Certain things liter' thee would never want my mother in a place like that. We need to have standards. You have recent i.: r ;:! see in the Valley that already have their medical endorse:mer.t. So in July they can open their doors ;l reedy. So we do have options -or medical here in the Valley. She stated tient having; morel}r: a .:..ti preeessore is not ruing to hurt anything. People work behind the seencs, they bring in income;; :mmre spronding money within the Vr,lley. They are buying their preducts here they have employees [Rile taxes all of that is very viable for our City and our economy, There is a Inedical research lieentee someone to grew specifically for research purposes, ALI oftheir product goes through the bane traceability system but its turned over to a school or university that is going! to do specific medical tests. We should allow that. It does not hurt anyone or anything. This isn't something that interacts with the public what -so -ever. Blake Alverts, tStil S. St. Charles: Mr. Alvcrts stated his problem is the ainoure of medical shops popping up, We scare). to have more o[ these than we have eseressa stands. He s'..;:c that bu diel rrr�l 1: iI .i they contribute ter the taxes that we collect in Valley, the revenue that could cone ire. ] :. :., ,.tel :rr l:•:.:,,:,;i when he read in the Spokesman Review that lletillwood is ttie isnring. their i i+,.: I ,in ; Lee marijuana in the hundreds of thousands, lettere we are. it tens c,fthousands Wel- •:o'..r ere Its r it irl:'lst and Liberty Lake, we should be kieking leti I lweref eutt. Bring in muc : Ii es :e -e...11.34: 111 , Alvcrt su_ ested that decrease the number of purely medical, they should all h4 rLt.:iI ib ineil. the tiske.d For a reasonable number of recreational shops. that three is not eel -melt 11-12-15 f Iaainir, Carnrnission Minutes ; `) Jahn Miller, 2124 S. Herald: Mr. Miller stated that he k a child of the sixties, he grew up and went to school ut Berkley, F -ie knows n little bit about marijuana, not because he uses k but because he's scut it abused. The question tame up about the amount of money that is taming into the City of Spokane Valley over and above the sales tax, he believed he read it was above $18,OOO and he also road that, that money is used to enforce the laws concerting marijuana, Sot if we arc bringing in money just to enforce the laws, not sure if that is a win-win rat anyone. He stated that he did not vote for marijuana in this state, and reels it is a mistake. Flo asked that the Commission consider Option 3, adopt .a p icrt icy of prohibitirin. Medical marijuana is a little different, he asked why ifitledical marijuana is considered to be a medial= wiry isn't a prescription written by a doctor, perhaps it is. Matt why is that prescription riot taken to an established drug store? The marijuana delivered to those folks could be tested, certified, safe for the intended use and that would take care of that problem. He stated that recreational marijuana makes no sertsc to him what so ever. He would like the Conrunissiort to Consider Option 3 at the least, maintain the moratorium and make it permanent. Commissioner Anderson ask l the erau{iratcc" if anyone rata a medical rrrarijr' is ctikne.Osar;ta, One member °lithe audience used to wort: at one. Another audience member stated that they run a recreational shop art ati'ou Id he available to answer any questions. C:nrr}rrtis,viemer- Kelley asked if the retail owner settee challenges taking the medical endorsement and seeparating:he recreational rraeu'ijuurarx time is nzred,ftarrr the medical marijuana ttahaieh is trrrtca'ecl Doug Peterson, 16104 E. Ricky Top Lane: Mr. Peterson stated that he did riot sot: a problem Neparutirts, the taxed from the untaxed- He has rout with the Department of Flcalth t •Bich will be bringing r i, r; stctns in the spring which his business will help beta test, His business is cmbracing it. ()rte survey a t;.'cl i ti,c business would train its people in more of consulting role for the medical, if they would pia, _. r rr, l would like everyone in his store to be trained medically through the stat;. Revenue C',lristi+'rt Ill tsri ci that his business has only been open for three months. it's I10t going t.. :,r ,. Iib:• , -a..a• i;r- i a. _i stores open on Trent in lvliILwcod. Part of the challenge k that the iraliL:': [ici a i:: ii;_rlt:-r :r:,i:n, a ;;.',• s 1 c worked with the City and with Christina Janssen. Origina]Iy there were thrc_ I tar t.'.:.: ".'H It_, . l .,w April away [rail and other trails made it tough to find a.Iccati,rn. When the Sane revamped v,.ir[1 `::r7"_ - chalk m ittg as a business owner. who just opened_ since r:e ju t got opened unto rite old la':'. ;. Mr Peter,oit stated one of his concerns as a business owner. the restrictions were difficult and ib.. iiaa. licenses may have Tess restrictions. He's heard dia. die zones are going to drop down to 500 Rita 10011 and that the licenses are not zone specific. You lawn "a" amount of licenses for the Valk_, bt;i ih- C n be from anywhere. The original licensing process .vas you were lieenscd Jab the Valley iF .i ha(' :! valid location_ As a business eavncr hu embraced the ellerages and will continue TO meet the star•:Ian-l4 the state. He invited the Commission to visit his shop, it .s professional envirnnrnent they take a ai- seriously". it is a nicL place, he stated that h is not like what you might think is is like. Mr. Peeter•,ar: that he does not o to the medical shops, he understands that tiro regulation process need to t.al3,' pl:y.:,:. ! l addressed die earlier comment on pestieitks, growers have a state issued list of pesticides arca ars: approved: the marijuana that is going through recreational stores is tested pretty exterrsivelyjtr.;t Irot specifically pesticide tested. There are labs that will test it. He is in talks with labs to putt` a:.aahh marc if their products that have been tested more. Cormttssioner Kelley compared business who still to cusrrarmrrs as well as whole stile, ret niat erd as t7 cauiparrs'orr io rrmrlrccrl marijuana Arad retail marijuana war'l? there he any prablenn? Mgr. Peterson stated that it's about building the lrcccss in the stare and makirig it logistically make sense. Need to he ?ry cicar with patients and regular recreational uses. There would need to be Iogisties in place, he '.': iI ..v'c rk I, the WSLCl3 to see what kind of process ,would meed to be in place, Mr. Peterson ,ci,iaxl .1 1 ;icer, civ. nor Thai: process is important, the cxpericrcc of the customer is important, regulation is 14,:err:int, A.; you t.r i w retail marijuana is one cf the most regulated processes in the uvarld. There is se. laud l ilial z stca.c has to tic to be open, we gladly =can: -13; t challenge. ff i r f.i;'� +�'.r;ti±['_i !„ 11:�: '}rl'i 1.'i 4i r C�rarrrritis'it.�rro.r° ��r.{r.+�trrxr irskecl�far•clarre�acuir}rr on r}r¢CDrr.-rrrra: . i'gdfP1':tE17rL'nf. orf! rilvr'errr~G' ra fxraEierad,s mould imply drat they .rc't-n}I},, i -r maedi arior', 1 ri' pf:arrrrrcru!' :,} r1=J!'iCcd?y whem yob' think .mete• 4 r d+l:'r�fc .. +:. :,P.�:.1, .' r` !fiat r _a.'t I, 11-12-15 t'larn_ng Cornrr,i$•siun \ rr}utvs } if you know 14 tae Departinva of !leach looking u! then! would Find, Chep person acting GS a ccrMWiFarra.jrOM offthring medical advice? Mr. Peterson stand it is goirig to he very strict. i-ie wvas in a meeting last week that was dcfiining what a consultant means. A person is not gong to be able to sake a two week course on marijuana tnedical and become a physician. He believes there will be'rahaittE opt how and what you can tell a patiettt, It will not be a position of giving medical advice rather explaining the product and what potential the effects arc of the product. Commissioners had questions about the eorwceutratiatt levels of medical verses recreation r arijtiana. Mr. Peterson confirmed that there is not a difference in concentration levels. Discussion continued on packaging and labeling differences for medical and recreation marijuana. It is the same product but regulated and taxed differently:. Commissioner Anderson declared a 10 minute break. Commissioners cantirmed w,^ith cCiscussioti. Commissioner Anderson suggested narrowing down the discussion :o tour subjects: who should get a retail license with a medical endorsement; should wc make regulations beyond the state in regards to home grew; extraction and where it should he allowed; finally should we allow cc•ops. Concerns about commercial rentals renting lo marijuana retail affecting the surrounding businesses. Mr, Peterson addressed that it is very dit`ticuit tc, find a location as well as higher rates are being charge for this type ofbusiness. Additionally marijuana businesses are having issues with banks being willing to accept funds, Mr, Peterson also kart}twg17t up the Fact that since it is federally illegal that the biwsiness;s are riot allowed to take any tax write-offs For operating their business. Dis:.us inn moved to the Opticns 2 of increasing buffers and the locations of co-ops. Interested in the l l}rt[} font buffer between stores and the residential zones and to look at !tow to allow cooperatives., CoLnnilssioners asked what happens to a business that beentnes legal. nnncauforming. Mr. Lamb stated drat if a legal, nonconforming use abandons their use for a year they y are done.. If there is damage up t' righty percent they can continue that use. Ms, Janssen stated that the legal, noncouforlltiryg had to resume operations within twelve niontlis. The question was raised as to whether a business may move locations and 5611 be maintain that legal, nonconforming, status. Mr. Lamb stated that the noncanroan ing use allows them to continue operating in that location with that use. [f they moved they would be subject to the new rules, Commissioners asked about nta.int°ainitwg the status quo of eurr-ent retail, producer. artd processor would that be considered prohibition. Further they asked if it would be pcssib[c to allow: the current retail shops tllc option of moving locations and maintaining license, Mr. Lamb stated he would heed to think about this further. The issue was raised that maintaining the three retail locations and that only one of these shops is located on a bus line. This may eau transporration and accessibility's For medical marijuana patients. The issue of capacity was raised, Mr. Lrsinb explaiitec[ that there will be a three tier structure related to square Footage ataci this will remain the same size, but allow more stores, he will confine. Di. ussian turned to the possibility of regulating, the ctlncertrltion of marijuana as well as the paraaging. Ms. Harrison returned to further discuss the different compounds within maryuann. Commissioners asked about controlling signage and promotion ofthe rn:lrijt.ran . Mr. Lamb stated that the State regulates the signage as it relates to the location. The City Joes not allow off site signage. Jenny Nickerson, Sr. Plans Examiner, presented an update or a proposal before the State Building Code Council to limit the number of plants to 15 in a buildings other than a Moderate Hazard Industrial Occupancy building. It-any entity wanted to grow more than 15 plants it wvould have to be in a Moderate Hazard Industrial Occupancy huik tins, a residential use would typically not be allowed in this zone without a fire sprinkler system. For the most part a large number Of our 'existing buildings that house residential rises wvould not lac appropriate for the gtooilw of any more than 15 plants. The. Commission asked why growing marijuana plants is considered to be a fire hazard. Ms. Nickerson stated that it is not necessarily afire hazard. However a iirttitation needed to be seal to determine if it would be a Factory occupancy ora standard garden. Acct-op which is able to grow up to 60 plants would aced to bean F 1 occupancy. She further explained that the types of operation in a building and size of the building would determine when tiro sprinkler systems would be required. If an extraction system is iii place that include chemicals thew can trigger a fire sprinkler system requirenwcnt at a much lower threshold. Mr. Lamb Pose g aft L 1-I2-13 Planning Commission tvtisrutcs Y`� it ti�tti :sir .villi clariftc ation that a co-op would be limited to 15 plants if located in a domicile, unless 1•i• were Ii -ated in an industfial rove_ i [w. Barlow reminded the commission ',1131, at the nextrneeting they will be hearing frorn the police and d .pnrirncnt. AUkrlc'r's0,1I ashy/ ►lahnl a MariitleMer s eciadlu cdrrrli is. M. F1arriSan explained that A s1icciaity dirk is a rotating clinic that have doctors who do authorizations for medical marijuana. are allowed Lo write thirty authorizations a month after that they have to report the number to ;i10 Stem.. ADJOURNMENT: There being no other business the meeting was edjaursaed at 5:39 pan. Datestgrted i�4l►t.o. Sectary 1 1-12-15 1'!:mrnn CurimiiS.",irill Minutes hoc 9 cf 9 CITY OF SPOKANE E VALLi'=Y Request for Planning Commission Action Meeting Date: December 10. 2015 'Ruin: Cheek .it1 that apply: 71 consan IJ. old business U flet+ bti iil:sti 1:; L1L1.11i:' '1a;lri:ri ir13t1r:YlrltioI L ail,f11111 7cport 17.I}.'1Yi. la i_' lit i 1;1ti4ii 1. IF I'' i"41..111"41.1.11.k: J\-i'r11 g.t1'JIJ � FIT )•t TITLE: Study session - Comprehensive Mariju,lna Regulations 10. SCItlPTIC)N OF IRr P 0.ti.AL: IrL-r1 '.;.LiEL :I.1 111'c ;! :2 .[td I, ckgruund on ciriwlnt a;r'; r1i melt , :rl1t: 1c City's current T11Z1'16'.i:•ui I rL!'11l.1Iions. CI1"I0I1: 1•1214t1IaLl(1L18. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 331.70A.106; RCW 69,50 (codifying initiative 502): RCW 69.51A; SVMC 17.80.150 and 19.30.040; SVMC 1915; $VMC 19.120,050 PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: C;'ir1, Council has adopted regulations as set forth in SVMC t9.L24,050 and SVMC 19.85 for the zoning ;Ind bulT ring :jf recreational marijunnu_ On December tuber 9. 2014, City Council adopted a moratorium on urrlrC.:rtsed marijuana uses (prirrtatiIy medical marijuana), On October 6, 201 5, City Council adopted a inOr:l1 •riuln on marijuana us©s licensed by the Washington Liquor and Caannnabis. Board t.-WSLCB"j. conducted a study session on October 22, 2015 and v_ic:o"cnib 07 1 2 2015, 13ACKGROiIJND: The City's in the process of developing comprehensive Local marijuana regulations. as required pursuant to moratoriums described bcic,v.'. Tian Plur riing Commission conducted a study ,'f 5;001 on October 22, 2015. On Novertiher 12. 2111:S, Piallnirl mmissin-1 zonducted a second study �� inr1 4111t# receive:. public comment regarding de,,dopmcit 01i_::ty marijuana regulations. l'Lannine. (:c1i'nhission has algia requested to hear from Spokane vn&,,,, ,!-.4.7,014.mic Valley Fire, and local 3+2L1c01 districts b4L'carc clisr.ussing and da4eiapiPl IIC.;l rc ulaticns. P1anring C'onnnlission will hear from Spokane Valley Police and Spokane Valley 174e [111 I Jh.:einbur 10, 2015. Statilia3 invited Central Valley Scanol District, East Valley School District. and \ vst Valley School District to participate or provide comments as well. Oitleslraajunr Pki.Iuring Cuiriijr ssicw i1t its Arut+cni/T.7 22 261.7i r„rc'ri►rr, DUI-iltf the Novernbet 12, IC:' I meeting„ there were several questions from Planning Co!rtrlli:tiion I a[rdinga variety of issues. .1.1;.1 anSwcr t11osc Issues at the December 10. 2015 meeting. L)11(.; iisue that 4t'a drsk;ut ed "! 1 ,11 ,'I ':I1L City could allow'medical-only- reca.t .•1..'11 111 ILr.0 (1 ci,,,,t,:iloci teere ;tion tl-mek.I1 '..11 't°I:iI1 note Chat the State sy5r :111 is set tell : I1 Erar Leii iit or rc•:.-ail stores. rct..U1 an option ofthcn :_•eking ar.d rccci-virlp.nlarijttml ond. -sari:ani. in 1 r;;e1 ',ta :• ItY.r-iiu,lrii: t:a qualified pm ° t'.l .!L .1 1a .—t til"111111 !':11•,' ,,'I;I.it[t ;It llll7E' i I1_ tlisl'::lC1ioil ]11 ;,;Lir Iti ' klith'L'l:cll stores" and 1.‹cfc:iti-: iuil tiCi1f1 S .i, :'1 ti.I!:.:` 'rLr.: .:.i 111, tea l sties. al)1'a t[ tiT,1 'T1iTr'.Ld]il'i; tax-exempt to C :r u1:1 L AC o1 'iw,j[e;c1;L!!11;11 '" :+. Llll [1iL.,l ' i5 ;i li ell=:r1g ci11C s 1 the State level much more so than can be parsed out from a land -use plain ir ; standpoint at the local level. Further legal and praelical aspects c1this issue will be discussed at the Di cemher 10, 2015 meeting. After hearing froth. Spokane Valley Police and Spokane Valley Fire, staff will be looking for direction From Planning Commission on what tltc City's marijuana regulations should accomplish. After receiving that direction, staff will draft proposed amendtncnts to match Planning Commissions direction and Planning Commission will conduct. a Further study session on the proposed amendments a5 well as a formal public heurirtgen the proposed amendments. As a reminder, there are numerous options tlunt Planning Commission. may ;:onsider as to what the City's marijuana regulations should accomplish, Stag has provided examples at prior meetings and the examples are included again below. Opf fret s City ReAralorkm Options Planning Commission a.2, consider a range of options far the City. The options rank From i,7, ri,::, il;n�a sa m current retul4I.eii. to adopting conte further limitations (that would allow a limited i,rcre.Vs :I licensed marijuana uses) to adopting a ban on additional licensed marijuana arses. Staff pri. ernuE. potential concept's to City Council ;at its August l, 201S, meeting. During that. meeting. Council iitdic i.:d ,i (b_ sire restrict marijuana uses to their current levels or to minimize increasing lite ,lumber or stores 'i.iie_ iaw would likely preclude the City -From expressly setting the number of stores to be a!Ionated tivitl:ln ir: tire,, but the City may adopt reasonable land use regulations governing the siting and location of s"t :' suras. One option Council discussed wus possibly including an additional buffer preventing retail s..07.cs from locating within 1,004 feet of any other licensed use. Option d; Rely on existing regulations. This approach would leave the existing City regulations in place to deal with any additional letail, production, aiid processing licenses, Under this option Commission should consideF whether these should be any additional regulations for cooperELLi". Vit; ILe t can only be located in residential zones). This would allow a potential increase in thy r`rirlIll4, aw,:fir prod tint ion. and process int,' stores within the ex.sting zones and subject to the buffers, "lite I Uri it ultimately be set by the State. Under this option, stag would re;onrttend minor change:+ i 4 -ink definitions to account for retail stores with rnvdic:tl marijuana endorsements. Under this option. Ir4r aro 727 parcels that would allow retail steres. i-lowevei•, not all are available due to market cows.. other commercial operations that take up a significant number of those parcels. Opiion 2: Adopt additional limitations, such us buffers between licensed marijuana uses, prohibiting cooperatives, or further limiting the allowable zones where licensed arses may locate. Far example, if Planning Commission wished to further limit stores, it could adopt a 1,000 foot buffer between licensed retail stems and all other licensed marijuana uses, This would lituit the number al -allowable parcels to 61. I-lawever, this does soot rake into account any existing commercial stores occupying those parcels or other market -tactor limits on those parcels. Further,. since there are licensed stores and due: to potential ri iisancc-type impacts on neighborhoods, Planning Commission could consideer prohibiting ccoperativcs l.L7rr,i rows of up to GO plants). Licensed marijuana use are currently allowed in four ones CUP, RC, and C. '1`11°ti could be further restricted to limit the areas where additional licensed shops could ].,)care by either reducing the mailable, zones or adopting an overlay zone limiting where licensed r.rc l ijuarla Amy located. Existing srcires that might otherwise he impacted by any new regulations SIC:IL! hcci ••roc Tlilri-crit :1ri'Tlinst owes and so would not he adversely impacted. Ad :iii ;1 I)';:1hillit-iii Lm scum: 1; ty"pes of licensed ntitl'i i imi L isi 110. Ill nse'I .ISIS t-C:c,1nh::�"::;.1 non-c.-ynf-oi-mirin uses and :Lo would not he required lc stop uIl rotioili. 'I 11^,L'?'.\-er. W any addition:1i iicctl; d Uses_ Note that Whi] o If l elf ' 'es prohiliiic.Lt is valid, lure have been no al}pellote ...ieurt decisions validating a city's mithcrity to b,in licensed marijuana uses, and so staff cannot definitively state what a court may do if' the City were challenged on a prohibition. Option 4 (provirlerfa:ti Qciober?2 meeting): • Allow only rnllilnurn number required i.t law. • Medical marijuana must be sold only at t•wcn2Ali-.);)al 1'tita l L'ILtki,. maLril;Lirt the exlS11r1u re«lil outlets but require them to obtain n medical. l id L 41111:1tt • rvlaintalrt thle current buffers, hitt possibly ell1C1!11! • +lllotiv cooperatives under the same 7.0niiii rxtIc cooperative requirement that one may only 11avc..1 cooperative in a (tom iIC. • Allow medical marjuarla growing in privaic 72sidenve fir personal use. a;7y:1 r, .l ; .1;'1+ •',li r ;ceived Limn the property ntaner in the case ot .t:nu:LI n ltiasec: !`aicilitics • Do not allow any solvent extraction within:lrl; 1'esiduric.f;d llaticile or 1]r,11,�rL}. • Require all inFitsed product or content -rale to hey purchased from inedicalireereariona. " tail outlet. A copy of the proposal is provided as part of -this Packet. Genera! Backgr°urrrrd General iril`rrmati•:Al regnethr!2 11.E b.ttl.«reiultc.. PL1iCris h%r iFi City ;inti state law requirements are provided ;_n t'7e Iti1'CA from 1:13 October 22, 21015 Ltice[ing, whit 1 is att welic'd. NTOTTCE.: Sraff contacted Spokane Valley Police and Spokane Valley File to present information. Staff SL:11L7i+1 cll�, :lit_'l� [4.: pl['l1C1 pate or provide comments. ..PPR€)\•'- i CIHTF.IZI.t: `1 1(° - cli[ n 1 7_E;i_150(I ), 7rr;wielcs :i.,prov ar. crit•.ri t for tee,..:uni dmeuis c Illi 'tC tll� er:terio:lS[I� uI itt:, LE:il t,llw �!I'C� l='tiC'l= i=1,?�.ILLI'.li'Cll(5) CIll15r I'0 c4'.•1;ISCtil1- v: 1111 1110 :!;til lictl:]le prsraiit'r13 i III,: and 1•t-c:r a ;1111.-[ nvi;11 r:.1:'.lion. tel ;ltc public I'.ealtl�. sclfety, .Welfare, and (}rt,[•. i [i ilk e 1ht:: 4 ll rctirll rii. RECCI1VNIE DED] _k€'1'Ii)w ss'orl :1Ca. Lcnise lSus on an option_ Cii:c ;ill ..-viioIl lr- C1 -'11::G1}1, tib:"t :'•I I tl"'.'.11 2pirepriatc proposed amendments based upon ;itis; Lu:i p It,l' llll'!i'.w[ 4.::315IClCratiL;n. STA1r CONTACT Christina Janssen — Planner fermi., Nickerson — Senior Plans Exalr,iner lir-''• Deputy City Attorney ti1..IA{ ttNIF'N'C; Cort nissiener Anderson B. ''...:i R, (71 1&11C..-\ from October 22, 2015 . C t::. '-. i Itl'c.•\ from November 12, 20. 15 ,11 41I 1; C. Copy 1,l .11 -Ili minutes From November 12, 21J 1 .-_- E. E-. 111:]1; licensed marijuana facilities Minutes $ptiltane Vnlley Pluming Commission Council Chambers — City Hall, 1.1ecembo.. 101.2015 Chairman Anderson called the meeting to order at 6!I:10 p.m. Corninissioli. -,:tatr Lid Cur Li .A-..:111egianc,c M. Horton took DIA and the FoLlowing member,. ;1:11: ,,L_Zi.c.^.'CL'e Kevin. Reather Graham Tim Kelley Mike Phillips Susan Scott Joe Stoy, absent -excused Sem Wood Cornrni.urioner Ptrocia to •'•q•:,1,!!!'t Coo; Gr(tinCtirt '.vas J.fxiJltr•ft'.:C.,,P, Zera John Cornir.t.nn.v Eiik City Lori PLI'ir.•:':r .1 Sr. 1-1um ?Laiiicr Ken PLaiiei Sectctary of tric ComirnigSibil Joe .5,roy f,rom the rpp.1..i.r.T. Tirg retre on this motion '11,a5 a in rssed. /O. Commissioner Suit 1.4.11 said on Page 3,secon.... Elitrawapb, I iu (111:_:1 - types of ifle.; ri::. regieLve considered; 421) " tr;1:5ktirige WherC yr"? piaNjuatia." 11 was deLmnined the at.' in frorc. d other correctivas to the utinmes. os cpprended. The yore pm al? dnoriodif we...! 0 i 1'01,01% COMMISSION R EP 0 RTS: regarding marijuana usage, [n2 ADIVIENESTRATIVE REPORT: Cmm ounit) Nlopmcni kiln Hui- rcpoi:cet ,:k:litl for Planning Commissi,un Ciputiirkgs AS 2(.r i\1r. W110 ViMilid he 'Leaving at the exc. 0." LIN and Mr, ilollrnan also reported :he first meeting of [he F I 1111111.1 1 .7: . 2016. This will allow for the delayed pror2-2Ns ILL Courim:sioners. Li January 28 meeting will be training which is rerpiNd icI rnr Cor Contiii.s.s,o(t,-A'$, PUBLIC COMMENT: No public. comments. COMMISSION BLIS I. 71/41 VSS: Public Hearing: STV -20(5-11011!„ Street k'n-un (in pcvLion of 3" rtikvcunc Karen Kenthdi pIi.il1JJ 11 icdik ;"•1 and 4111. Av.-..nue ti5t 'ad 141:L:111 1.1`112 340 NO ia length and innr,i.L,L ..7,0 t;2:c[. -Au; i);.r.;e!E :471 cni2o1idated lac onc. Scud] or. 3' Av2.rui •)Nrce!.F. CAC LI:id iiccess will be by an existing cas:rnclii: tr..)m 1'' renctiniK, Ms. Kendall prnented[iv EdruiIie 1i' the niinilictird l'or the recitvast: 1_ 111e area proposed to be vacated is Lull Ho_ ; 1;1c 11 2. Location of road limits ninKirnuirt use of.t.iittmg 3. All six parte b abutting 3'4 Avenue (north:10'AI oreLI K. t.;[in,,, Ily ty,xnc.-,r 4. The structures along thc wcst proneril ri itth II.Nuy cuiiiii1iOfl, and 5. No parcels use 1`.6 Avenue for access. Commissioner Scott. said the staff report nicrni)ii.cd a1)uttii4,2, pl-Qptity along 3'd were notified riLly.5.111,2[1 11H on the City's noticing bit r ;vas nnone on 4' Avenue slot" ricd. \ Kctb:.11..'11 scntenc,.: 12, •iii-7ar. .22.-A.11,01C 6' WO.' 1,7; brri. rt:pl,Lcv: an 12, 20 II1E Jruf10 Cnnim:ssioner Kelly rpoPcd Iic [Wended a -1:11.11'2, a: C -:n.,211' -'.1e2 :_:iirnmitislnti Minima Pala2et a the properly owners who were rtbutting :7"1 Avenue wcrc notified. Commissioner Scat[ ti'4tl ti_ r.rt: ,Iii I:ermori with the easement was not notified. Cowan ia ns ked about the noticing on the property and Ms. Kendall explained the pnstin , requiremenla fl:Ir a street vacation and the location of the signs which had beim posted on the properly- Mr. Woad mentioned the sign hanging on the fence was difficult to see. Commissioner Anderson asked why the southern Tots were not combined into one parcel. itis. Kendall asked for clarification, Mr. Anderson said the rorthcrn parcels were proposed to be combined into, one parcel. The southern three parcels are being proposed as two parcels instead of one as is being done on the north side of the right-of-way (ROW). Mr. Anderson ~unloved a reason why the parcels were being aonftgured as proposed. Ms. Kendall suited [hare are t'vc single f hilly[ rc3idences nn tIi 131-id and in order for each residence to have its own parcel this is how the configuration u=1; ;i-c>iiosed. Mr. Ander_aon said he thought the goal was to develop the property into muttifam' iv I; .a:I'-- l.• -int. Ms, Kendall stated staff was not aware of any future development plan for the property. If in the future, the parcel configuration did nut work for the property owner, them steps could be tCilit.ii at the time of development to realign diem. Commissioner Scott stated she was co treaded about the size of tllc eeisernents- One ciftharn is a IMoot driveway easement which was granled in 2002. to serve as a driveway for one of the homes on the Applicant's properly and an easement which Will be granted to the City fora path to the Appleway Trail which is drown to he 15-feet wide. Ms. Kendall stated as part or the proposal, adjacent parcels with .It:ccas are not haul:ad at. Ms. Kendall said only daring Future development would acc:s.s to the parcels ie:nrl C''' be 14idres:,tsd. Ms. Scott vas concerned thewedtc the wcs., with 111e coli:tl4.l :;i.,anicitt'vas ltii. i)oLi 14[: 01 Tx: street vacation. senior Planner Lori Barlow Cep:a4I1 : the notraiiiig 1:11 :ikk_S to tate i.c�ltillliSs {11L ^s. 'Hie noticing requirements tier a proposed street iI' 1:'toJ tlst` :;lr, ':treat 't! comment. Ms. Ba1-1ol' sand the property- to winch tile. Scan a a.. i; ,i.- 1s aft :Kit bti [hu of the street. Ids. Barlow said the noticing e.rpui'c ilCr1'. her.•'.: _::1 :n't; ['tier;' discus-;:on ra .hi i1t.;:�1 t':,. 1L:iire access v.'alild be taken up irfurther develupine COinni:ssit,ti. ..tinder}on opened the public hearing at 6:30 p.in. Conines-;ict1e ,Anderson asked the applicant if he would Like to spc=:'I, Ilic (lie audierIL: 1iv d 1 not really+ have anything to say. Commissioner Andel cii as'.,.LL Ilii ft• [cp ttyi I1 the podium to ;pea': because he wanted to question hien. Dain Fdultquist, 14,502 N. Freya: Mr. I-lultguist stated Inc had 111S} ectu"iiissionea Anderson asked to clarity whether the: driveway easement, which serves one of the Mouses on Mr. L1u]tquist's property, wank' Ifo an easement as it is. Mr. L-Itlttgrrist said it was just a driveway to the ]louse on his property, Calx nlissi4lr:er .Anderson asI:cc i F tic had to leave it as an easement. Mr. Hultquist stated he did net understand tlic question. Commissioner Anderson asked irbeticveloped the property in the future, if the easement would change. Mr 1-itiltgtlist stated it would he 1ifi,rd to say[, he didn't know what else it would be. He had been planning on developing stir: property fur 20+ years now and it still looks lite same. 1-Le said icer could, root at till time, anticipate what would Kapp rl to the property. He would not want to give up the easement since it scrums his rental property. Commissioner Anderson aSked Mr. Hultquist if [he easement w.ns :is it is, where it is and would not change:. Mr. Hultgaist again stated Iie was net sure NNW,: ivt ?w,nd.: h en was asking, but it wins .4 II easement tc'the rental prcperty. IVIS, Barlow clarif ad that iii this ;:,tic ;:, sl1C casement will remain as it is. Mr. Anderson stated he was (tying to look out for the property ownci lint invehhed in this process. Having no one else who wanted to testily, Commissioner Andersoli closers the ptabl[c ]rearing at 6:33 P. m. Commissioner '~Vood stated Iie had no issues with ti'ris proposal. Camsr.issiorter Deily said lie did not have a problem with it either. Corttmissiouer Philips was only concerned there ti"ould not be a landlocked parcel, Commissioner Anderson said lie had no problem with the street vacation, hut be was fixated on Lhc easements. He was concerned the easeinelits for the property would not he sufficient for future deveiopment. Contlmissioner Scott asked if ti3e property had been inveslilalod to be one which the ROW would go back to the propee y owner. Deputy City Attorney Erik Lamb stated, although he did not look up to see if lllis plat was dared previously to 1904, if it had been then the land would have reverted IzIO-ii Planning Csanunissiuii MinnIcs I'agc3 of9 back to the property owner. Ms. Scott wondered irate City would have to buy back the ROW 1rih;re WAS future development. Ms. Barlow stated if there tions future development, the ROW v.muuld be dedicated to the City. Ms. Scott was concerned the increase. in the amount of square footage or the properties would increase the density allowed in the arca. Ville' property was developed, CoutitiisSfoner Graham mooed era approve ST V -20.1.5-000L The vote on f!nr +aroiion wrts six in fraior. zero against artdthe Nrolioft paia'.sed Nanning Outrun Issiort Findings: STV -2 H5 -40b1, Street Vacation of portion of 3'1 Avenue Ms. Kendall stated the City preferred process is to raring the findings back at lair' r meeting after the l,uhlte hen-ing However because of the holidays and the Planning Commission's next available meeting for business would riot be until February, staff :s bringing the findings forward now. Ms. Barlow stated the proposed findings reflect the decision made at the public hearing- C'oiaraaissorterr. Cia'rrlro as waved& crppi'U, ,. retie Prcitinraa ; CUHrriris,Crdra firrclirags for STV -2015-11061, the vote on the enc3tioer rine SO: in AMP, _Lara agaiirsi and e!te wain' prase d. CTA -2015-0006 Marijuana ijuana Regutiations Commissioner Anderson asked the Commissioncrs if they ikv+anted to proceed with the study session or to defer the discussion lentil new Commissioners are appointer:! die New Year. Deputy City Attoriiey Lamb said this ~would be up to the Commissioners, mini LIP.A ,..ert people in .dteudanee who came to speak to ilea: sribject and there would be at written record o Itr . ir,_eti acs for tiro tees, rncrniters to review, There was consensus to continue with the study sessio s <rt ', listen eta the people who carate to share infer imilian regarding marijuana in the City anut related fire codes Lt. Khris Thompson, Spokane Valley Police Dettar'tnuint (SVPD): L.t, Thompson stated it had been long process in clianging the regulations regarding the Iegislartion of rtiarijuana, Senate Bill 5452 brings together how medical at compliant marijuana will be handled. The C;ty's numbers since lite passing of 1-502, which is when the police department stated tracking marijuana related driving under the influence (DUD. In tlirr 'first period aFte.• law ,aras enacted the police made 13 arrests, Econ of which were minors. In. 2013, there were 43 arrests with 20 being miners. Ix Thompson clarified the law reads a `rnirtor would be anyone 21 years of age or younger. Commissioner Kelley asked if these went: just marijuana arrests, or all DUI arrests, Lt. Thompson stated Meese were. all intoxicants, including alcohol, marijuana and other intoxicants. He continued in 20! 4 there were 62 total incidents, with 22 of theme being; under age:. So far this year there have been 50 D'.„11 arrests with 15 of them being under age Thml were DUI, by drug, specifically rrturijuana. Comnrissic ner Wood asked if there was a blood lest associated with the DL'1 arrests, t.t. Tlwinpgon said there are many methods used to confirm the use of drugs. He said there are peap* trairi.d specifically to determine if sorneoate is using drugs at the Linc they are pulled ever. In 2013/14. when rite SVPD StFirisd tracking marijuana rain ted calls there were ;.1 calls related to Inarijuanti. These could be burglary, thefi, properly crimes and so on. lit 2015 tl-_er2 been gS inc.-id:Nits so far. He stated about Lialt-of the arrests were minors and ihcre was a trend trf but:nit becoming involved int these crimes. Commissioner Graham asked if Lt. Thompson was aware of any increase in funding to support the po]ic,: departments. Lt. Thompson said he was not aware, but this would t;,. question for administrative staff. Commissioner Kelley asked how the police department handles cis .s where plants were involved if the person owning the }prints stated they were for medical gegen. Lt. Thompson stated there were different levels of enforcement between Ilse different police cicpatrtrnents and tlic Liquor rind Cannabis Board (WSLC13). A medical patient is required to keep paperworl: ;irc to show if there is ever tan issue with prams being grown in a (tome. Lt. Thompson stated laatien.;, who wished to grow their own, would need to he licensed in order to avoid potential prosecution. Commissioners had questions regarding cooperative grow. Lt. Thompson stated the rules for n cooperative grow have changed, from allowing 10 people to participate to four, it also reduced the number of plants which will be allowed. Registration would assist officers in knowing where authorized growing, ,.vonld happen, but it is voluntary for individuals. However the nle'ditr71 card r ived from the doctor would state how ninny peones lite patient needs, C.nnamissinner KeF!e.' asked if the increase in crimes could be pin -pointed to c act:rring around schcots, siting the Commission has been tasked to consider new regulations including new possible buffers around certain facilities. Lt Thompson stated he did not have hmt detail of information with him, but it might be possible to fund the 12•10-I$ Pinning Com nrissiois IMtirsutis Pale 4nr9 information at a later time. Commissioner Scott asked about enforcement from the WSLCB Lt. Thompson stated there are different levels of enforcement and Cite W5i,Cf enforces the licensing, rice police enforce the crisninul virrlarions. She also asked if the information regarding un in-home grow MIS supposed to be posted on the door of the room containing the plants. Lt. Thompson stated the patient is required to have the information readily available, it should be posted but this is not always thv case. Commissioner Wood asked if there was a portion of the City getting more criminal incidences than another. Li 'Thompson slated it was all over the City, not in any one pine. Commissioner Ston also ast:cd if, in his personal opinion, the ofncer could see the trend continuing Lt. Thompson said he could see the trend continuing with the availability eafthe product. 'reg Rogers, Spokane Valley Eire Dept. Fire Marshall: Mr. Rogers stated he did swot ham the numbers, like the police department does because they do not associate these brings with their response with the chemical components which are used. They have seen an increase in call volume, mainly from older adults whin are experimenting, !wised cn people thinking they are leaving symptoms of larger issues such as a passible heart a.tttck. Said lac bars seen the call volume increase in the last month, of rinaulhrsri-r-ecl bt.rn of harvested plants and feels this is in part the to fewer extraction processors in the county. In these incidents, the fire department is required to turn these incidents over to the Cle=an Air Agency, and they are responsible for the enforcement. Tracy Harvey, Spokane Vrtlley Fire Dept_ Fire Protection Engineer: Ms. Harvey stated she has become involved in the mart, uana re¢uIations tltrot[gh the trading permit process. She his noted a need Tor regulations to make stiru the growing and piocessingof the marijuana are done salol:!. She has been involved with the international Fire Cone 2015 amendments. She t[:1• -'t uteri Hive lacca some emergency umen'Jnments to address some of the extraction processes. `aisry st,;d I3W participating. in a Cannabis Technical Advisory Group for the Siete Building Cock reNi 4cor• : ',i .gate the Fire department is learning From the growers and proeessers mile! li, .+Y in regulate these businesses. CantmissionerGrtis;un about the extraction i ro ±,s -'s Find ;lee ,Flt.iic:l I`:iciCities which are licensed to do business, but are net licensed to operate ES a riw. :::N i,.:;::[v:; `• Cs. 't,��,. y explained as the new rules take fNct and 'iucdicaF' marijuana gets rot: -.!C irltr. stores the regtrireniet is for the rccrcationa: will apply. A new permit, which hay h:cr- :,c:o:licd by the Fire Code. stales any new extraction processes most bo reviewed) by the local tiro :3c11.:7.[1l1 [it. There 111 be inspections of the processes, fneilities grad an annual review will be re gSrir::cl- r tt;iii ,r3' tier Greiran. asked if the fere department had responded to any MIN at ant wrf tiro C ty`[•:3r tlrc:dUCCLZ, Mr. Rogers stated they had not. He mita the processor's and growers ha'. r tirc depar1sucat to look at what they are Going so they are tante aware of what is going on a; tlac, I1,-cal);:r[y H Cas--, 471I'tlac need response. Mr. lagers said he was Aar] Ilte medical would Iiavc Iu Follow the wars: regwI[1(zia, as. recreational, wlhicli means they will rrat be able to open business nnlcE;s they i are; been thrbu,ia department permitting„ process. Ms. Harvey explaincd cL:rr[ Fitly lli :;: i :101 ;I 17 •;:i .t sior- in the City which is using a chemical extraction process. Soine are using a CO2 system, bi i riot a chemical rxtr:[c:irrr - Commissioner Anderson asked if harvested plants can be taken to the `c:lean roe=[l" i„ .rt,.A the transfer station. Ms. Harvey stated there 15 a process where the plaints mast be taken to ncrgy Plant for destruction. Mr. Lamb offered theme are; also stow regulations which r::Ei',ir:: the addition afnon-edible materials in with the plants so there is no useable material, Commissioner Wood asked if y, on have a cooperative wow of two to four people, acid LIk can grovr. up to 6o plants, aren't they using halogen lights to grow the plants, which could be a tire !wnfarel. Harvey stated nanny are using LEI) lights now. Commissioner Wood said he felt this type ofcl:rratior. could cause trouble for the fire department. Ms. Harvey stated a couple of yews ag,o. thele Wei ra ti'e 1 :1 garage; which had a grow operation in it Tlic two minors running the operation had Fisc :ichl sl:;. 1?.at this was seldom. Commissioner Wood asked if using so [mach imam to those kinds of llatngs, wouldn't ibis be a concern to the fire department'? ;,.:. Harvey . [ :rt .l [ 1ivrnsiz would be needed to [make any changes to the (tome. Changes to the cli:c-i, 1:.II [. a -; Labor tend Industries, which the City does riot have a hand in. Ccinn>!i r:i,:ie'i 1 it nett a way to make suggestions requiring these types o changes Lind tl,;.-.;r, have to meet a certain stnnr and to be safe. Ms. Harvey stated the re6iski ins ;ilr.:ad . :,.11, i - :e .,'I1r.isl _ w•: occupancy to an h.-1 occupancy, which would require iL pertniL and City r..;°::, ,.s 1' 4. e ,. e: izt ,s rectory industrial moderate-[tazurd out:opaU y In :in F-1 ocenpil1Cy (were °.; i 12.10.15 Planning Commission tvliuuiw:s Page 5 or') minimum at whielt the building is required to have sprinklers. Most cooperative, grows ww'oule nal trigger this rcquircment, Sprinklers aro based on the size and square footage of a building, nor on hew many plants might be growing in a home. Jenny Nickerson, Senior Plums Examiner. Ms. Nickerson responded to a question from Commissioners regarding the ability to require sprinklers in a cooperative. Ms. Nickerson pointed out some or sults being discussed are proposed, and have not been adopted by the State Building Code Council, and are not currently requirements. She s: id in theory if`ttn in-home grow Bart 17 plains, was classified as F -I occupancy, there would be miniirrum life safety rtquirsuse.nts in plaec. Sprinkler thresholds arc generally at 12,O00 square feet for ort F-1 ucctkprrncy. I -Lo xe i. on F-1 occupancy of ark size is going rn he subject to certai.: fire sensitivity, egress in an emergency situation, including address and posting measures which would allow the lire departirment to respond adequately in an emergency. Coittrnissioner Kc1Lcy asked if a daycare with 7,00 square feet would nnl rceltiire a sprtrkler system. Ms. Nickerson stated a dnyarre k r different occupancy and the requirement wcutd be based on ti:e age of the children, number of exits, and the number of children which would be oceontrnndated in that building. Ms. Nickerson felt a 7,000 square foot daycare would probably be a sprinkled I uilding. Commissioner Kiley asked if the Commission could suggest lowering the limits for a home grow npertItion. NIs. Nickerson said canopy space could be something which could be considered. Site said it could be considered, tighter sprinkler thresholds for !lose types of uses. Commissioner Graham asked if a co-op has 17 plaints, have registered with the state its u co-op, do they need to apply for A change of occupancy. Ms. Nickerson said, assuming the proposed regulations are adopted, whicb would trigger tltc F-1 occupancy requirement, a single Tinnily dwelling would not be consideree an C' -I occupancy classifications. She said what had been discussed al the previous meeting was ifa grow kavas hatred in a building which has an F-1 occupancy and a person decided to I;va in the building, that would trier the fire sprinkler requirement, no matter what the square tentage was. Sprinklers are only gain; to be required ifa person is living in the same building. A detached garage would need to maintain et least 20 feet of separation. Their tame a question regarding a domicile, which is in the state code as a regluirement for a co-op, but. Mr. Lamb stated it would not fit the City's regulations for residential zoning. Coiixinissioner Wood stated he e,1, riot understand a cooperative very well. Ha offered a likely suggestion of a person with a ni(c! c-.' :.,rr:i for marijuana. That person wanted to grew 15 marijuana plants iti their home, a person could do thin-. Mr. I.anah stated unless that person wanted to modify their borne in a wet' which would trigger a standard buildings permit, there would be no my anyone would know about the ;plants. Commissioner Wood confirmed no one in the City tv"culd know abvul the growing plants, ifa patient decided to do so. A cooperative is i.rp to Farr individuals who decide to grew plants to,getlter, Mr. Lamb slid tliis would he Icgal under current local waning rides_ However, there are proposed changes to tttc bni.dirag code, where once a person is growing gwcr 15 t,l;ln_s there would be a requirement far a chain;+t in occupancy. Currently zoning does not allow Coy :tu irluatrial' building irk a residciatial zone. A c:rt•*i:' Inas It, register with the state, however there k no mechanism wvltich shales that iffinrrnation with the jurisdiction. MT. Rogers stated once ai permi' is applied for 1i change of occupancy and is approved, then it would irigger annual inspections Front the Fire department. itwould Pc considered part of n twine business and al Inv; for the inspections, Commissioner Kelley asked lithe City liad the power to require anyone who applies for a medical marijuana card to register with the City. Mr. Laura stated he did not kol this would be possible based on the ;teed to protect an individual's medical records accordine to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountabilitt. Act 1 [?P.'\A). and k could be a possible violation of an irtdividtutl"s rights. Commissioner Wood asked 1f inc sug«cstiort of riot allowing cooperatives in the City would be a problems. Mr. Lamb stated it was in theRev,- state law to allow the prohibition oft5aoperativ'es if jurisdiction chose. Mr. Lamb stated the earrperatiw'e was allowed 1713T more rural areas, wlsere some patients [night not ice able to gel to a store to purchase what they reed. Mr. Lamb said he felt ti•e City could site other stores in ;lsv areas in the county as well as a person could grow for themselves. Lt. T1sontpson added regarding, medical ,rutlierization charges. patients do not need to enter into a registration, they can purchase marijuana at retail amounts. and pay the extra tax. If a patient does voluntarily register, then they are able to purchase a higher quantity than a tegular retail customer and they will not have to pay the totes, Lt, Thompson said he would try and get more information for the Commissioners regarding property crimes around within a quarter mile around a retail store. 12-10-15 Plaraninf Cuii,ii iwsic r kliuulufi !'ase G ai 9 Commissioner Graham asked if there were regulations in place where if u person went into a retail location and they :appeared to be `intoxicated' dens the retail store trade the riuhl to refuse service to them, and Lt. Thompson said he gild not know. Mr. Lnanb then stated he would Tike to address some of the questions which were raised al the last meeting. • Qr>ecstion: How much mutiny in taxes is the City getting from marijuana? The taxes being received are a 371% »cine tax but also general sales taxes. Producers acrd processors are considcn d wholesale and so they gencra:e na knees. Said wa do see secondary benefits of employees who work for these operators void would live or shop in the City, l'[r. i.r,-tel.' said rr- least once laroduceripracessor employees l.t7fi people. The Cit 's distribution in 20!6 of the c vise tax is $75,000, hosed ori the S7% tart collected at rhe point of sale. The remit [:i1 rations tin gerter.tt ing a Fairly good business and the sales tax for this year should b4 in the arca of F 2.OQd. The stAtc must usi a prrrtivan or the revenue generated for education and enforcement. The distribution fb the City has not been lied to this. WSLCF3 reported for their fiscal year ending June 30, 2015 ir fill QrSpokaii C41:nty, who were allowed 13 retail shops total, from producers Leas. St31 6,000, S14.000,000 from processors and 537,001.1,00 in stiks from retailers. • Question Can the City restrict retail outlets to be medical only? Mr. Lamb said after looking at rise law there eauld 1r4 significant legal questions From :a preemption stand point, primarily based on the way than3tut lits set the licensing or the ret:.il stores. l`hc City would no[ be 1.-arcking at it from a land use basis, but It the clo their b:isiix,s and that is +;e., rued by t:ru licensure. scheme. Cased on this the City would he trying to sr,2r, two tl12 stat is rc,l _ There were questions reg:rr°clin2 the health Department. The Health L:.p:trlia:..it[ It:iz [''°<nr:til [iE;rd then_ could be some beneficial propt:rties in marijuana. They can't n7:ric ii :7 13r tiwrih 1 a aliciae so what people are commonly referring to as -riedicat marijuana is ivi lr n I'c[:•.7ds°:, }<:''. b.; the Dep;rrtrnei r of Health as -medical" marijuana. The terra used is ec.muli::nt`° n7:trija,:u:a. 1l7 ry will bc three different types of compliant marijuana. Tilw:• ., 1 lee :;e:rr��c;i rrr;!riu,r marijuana wlriclt [y sarfc Handling and litnhs use ofpe:s.iric�c milligrams of THC, this will lead to patients having a cleaner pi::11:_.. "l r. n: ;r :! compiiale this cannot be [n loud form, it roust be in caps.:1,.:•i a'.°: t .:: 1ai�lt THC compliant has a hit her Ti-1C than is allowed for recreational, the i I l l i l . l , Board ; 0 milligratms per serving and is only available to gtiwlified p 3tic[7::.. r.. 1 to r+ i It_ h CBD compliant" which i3 similar to the high THC but the ratio of tit°_ :,i',. I ,.,r°.r than the EHC. This marijtiniltt has more lain relieving affects, big is allowed .7y ;11Y buyer. Only the high TI4C compliant will require a medical card for ptercitase. The hlealtt C)t3partnunl tivill nut be regulating the marijuana more than this at this time. This would be why it WDcld 7a difficult for the City to separate the two types of stores. Cnirainissioiter Wood asked if the City could regulate growing in homes. Mr. Lamb said it would 'taut to come from a healtlifsafc: standpoint which would roguire talking about any gardener and what they want to grow, Commissioner Kelley .asked if the City had the right to make a prohibition uta medical marijuana lwtne grows. Mr. Lamb coni' cted saying the City could !limit the cooperatives, but the individual patient w.'hc wants to ,grow up to 15 plants, there would be a very difficult time in prohibiting thorn. if it was done there was a health/safety standpoint wwhith ‘,..cold apply to all plants being grown. Commissioner Anderson said Iic felt the Health Department supported his theory of it being a public health/salty issue for !laving segregated facilities. Mr_ Lamb said the Department of Health has made different clasfiiFicatlons for cofltpliaai :r3:7rijunna. Commissioner Anderson said the only thing common about the two types t stores is the word marijuana. 1-Ic feels there would be different inventories, there should be a separate wall between the two facilities ir order to keep the public safe from the sales of the wrong product to the. wrung person. Ile offered that he ..would be willing to take the chr:rice in :i court robin on itis idea. Mr. Lam!; said I.:2 (isl 1.J1 know from an enforcement standpc int, how this could bc done. Compliant marijuana kw:ira t,r trlr!. to anyone. The only time a sale would meed to have a thee: for a medical card witty:! Lac if a p..rson wanted to. 1) buy in hither than recreational amounts, 21 buy risc high Tl [C marijuana or 3) didn't want to pay the sales lax. Mr- Anderson conLiniac1 he st [1 f2.1i tlt:it medical and recreational should not be in :he sarrac building, then there could be mow a4do .�I shops aftd we could get away from alLowitag MOM recreational shops, Mr. Lamb said the 12-10.15 Planning Commission Minutes L'ri of 9 L 11.1 U.r;;r E:- t1. C' ty would be trying to enforce the limit that a retail store would not be selling I+:cre[itiau ni .i5 well as :l medical store. Commissioner Graham asked Mt. Lamb to L:,:) a:n this, A. a retail marijuana store ,any person eon go in and buy any kind ofmorijIYana they E Xi. E?['l' for high 'roc compliant marijuana. Mr, Ltinib said if the City were to only r ° a:,l_:i:. iilitrijuanti stores, tinyone over the age of 21 Nv'ould be able to go in and buy any of 111,s Izroduct<, except the high TI'iC complialit marijuana. Conilxiissioner Graham asked whit i' IAdd he tiie problem with this proposal. Mr. Lamb asked what the goal wallet be in trying to do this. Mr, Anderson asked if inct ical inti. ijuana wouldn't be more expensive, have to have trainin„ a consultant is mviired, t:glrter product regulations, tighter packaging regulations, itt general a recreational user would want to go somewhere else and bey their product. Comri'issioner Kelley said many businessci sell rota'ilfwltofesale in the same phot.. Ms. Janssen asked the Commissioners to clarity why they would want to separate the two businesses. Commissioner Anderson said to keep the number of major retail stores from growing and medical has a legitimate paint, and the state is saying we have to have more outlets. The Commissioners Said they are frustrated the rules kt.cp chats irig while we are trying to make the rules. Commissioner Graham said as orluly 2016 all of fbc unlicensed dispensaries will have to be aut of business or 'loved to a retail stow She asked if it was far to these business owners. She asked if the City ;k:tooted something, like Commissioner Anderson was proposing, couldn't tEiose businesses appy o_l b one of those places. IT would protect their business, thcyv are used to p}'r,vrdinq medical Inariju.;L.a. Mr. Lamb said :Vey could and it would be up to the brit t}clti,l':: t'LOV'ill+, IIi .virr,I Iii ,•+uuld like to ii Il ir`ht frl's' [;Erlii,lr ii they :'r: 4rc l:1y [lD 11: they are g 'rn i tc} pr :ii,:il St res t i,}” cistdd rc!.II LuIneS in a( Itli:; ti:i1 .-e::orid lie leis tr':: 1:I11:".' tlliw C1 iSi{Si" would iaa slltliect :41 4 CII ll :1+ f119' xl"irllt a i.: :II i r4iiti. mil:v : I roil not r ut to Sill Int Ii..111. it l..tll{I ''= ;')j_ct LY, Cir.11:','""' I aLI ' 'l:'S d Ll� lti. r Ill .p",}l . 11 :' cot 1nCCI1Call {:I'ii3L . lil.'S iiud 44E1 -Jim! li.r_Il: .11. :.t'."cnue 1CM cuntinue then i,Il iIIi::;ti ,'. i11{• YI. ;i icr.t'Ir'1; filly" !7.701•C rt ['4fItIC [' 11 r II i 1C it I.r.n1h x171 r1 the tr] is �[:ir';c Ir' .t . ti,.li. :: II1c City man' !Hy 11cc:.l r71 'i'.r c;itilrn.Yn'.(V. 1.1c 5r3ir theft: is nl: {�t1..Ir:::1.;: 1 I. i tllv44 tC ?=l t Ii:'_ .>'iltC ta'Cztt.:C :", '1.1:'Lrl xi tCtl[ IIl k.11l I1 is t:; rIC = '::L,' .'.t ;l;i' i3r'tiL I 5i t fir t I1, rrwrul;;1':.1 t'.'1 11:111' tho ;illi 7•,'{t'.il ]lrl}'l bel' pt .;. -Iti•ti, .-.5.1'Ci .1'13Q �cl. Jawi 1:3;4r:J tli'r91:§ ',L'[I'. n:-.. 1 LI, tollrtive t,l If.. ;,;: 111:,: Ir:l:'1' tiiI ,nlalw[npritq'° ,Ir,+_u ne.,rc grir,ll in order ;•> nr:i 1Y' v':.rs a'.vay LI) I.r4'I1L!i a 1 IILI_I-l: i1C, -.:' L 1 11:Z Lay u,l[iI '°l'.l: 1'u t SSA' ['li: °' is ',} d <' l]l:t'tet. daiined rotes=e.!7,[irdil1 tiiC s IIIiY,� C+ lttadjt ;lit-, 1.tr. Lanni) 3tsz[I ti.l; w+,rILI_+_ [ •_', c:lr: opt ion.. + If the City prohibited any rztw new stores could c.4isrin1; ;tomes be t'rrnir+l 1 t:11 nonconforming uses earl be allowed to move around tete City. -I•Iic:rl; is ri ails for tiff. Ice billboards, There is no statutory rule which would prohibit it. Mr. Lamb cautioned ilii rc i [i. outer business in the Cit' which would be allowved to do that andel' cur non -conforming use provisions. Calntiossioner Scott wondered if :his would not 6e : problem because v.>^ cr3 clot allow otjier businesses to iso this. She said lltese businesses have already said they know this is a high risk latlsine s and A112 did not reel obligated to allow special accornrnodations. Mr. Lamb said the City's current nonconforming regulations would take care of these concerns. • Signage restrictions: Mr. Lambsaid he has concerns about the First Amendment and l:'�ili hw regulate the content of signs. 1 -le sait_' there was a question atom. comparing it cr. ci uu'r'tt advertising. He said this kiwi.• was written wvith extensive studies on how long a minter ;t•cs advertisement can directly affect their likelihood Lising that product. There ww:i.S serol. , factual basis for those laws. If the City were to cevelop a I'aetual record, we might he able :r develop a regulation along those lines,. TIhere was a recent court case (Coed vs_ tbrLL. Gilbert) wl}io1i has strengthened First Amendment protections and further rt'Stric.l' ti" c;i' authority for their sign codes„ The state has significant restrictions on signs. The s1;it:: l:r,c 9107. allow~' mare than two signs on site, tend signs arc limited o 1440 square niches. code does Clot anew any off-site signage. Tlie WSLC8 also does not allow the s.:gns appealing to chi#dren- They have stated, but [t is not in the miles, they will not allow signs +.with cannabis leaves in than. I 1- I I 5 Phannietz.CuntimissianMinutti Pap 8of9 Coltirtaissiimer Wood Said his opinion moving rorwtard would beta allow the three existing retail stores to become licensed i,sedic tl inarljuana stores. He said he felt the three retail toilets were enough, the number of pr3eecsstirs and producers was sufficient. He stL I we should allow a private individual patient the right to grow up to 15 pu'aits, but not to allow cooperatives in the City. The City should maintain ail of the current buffers around schools, parks ald city land. Commissioner Scott said she tagre:ul with Commissioner Wood and would make the three existing stores n legal nonCOIaforrnilat'• use. Commissioner Phill:las said he agreed with Contrnissiouer Wood, he would like to reduce the ones we already have but did not feel that tia'as possible. Commissioner Anderson said he did not see any reason why the City would change or expand its przcessing and producing regulations. He is in favor of eliminating cooperatives. He would like to require the home owner be aware when someone is growing plants on their property for medicinal purposes. He feels all the boundaries should remain the same. lie did not foci the City should Ebe allowing home extraction. He would allow more: steins if they could be medical only, even though lie fee is it would Wort, but if not then he would riot allow any mare stares in the City. COromiss]oner Kelley said he agrees with [ate all the guidelines proposed, but he would inc:case the bugs. Commissioner Wood said some orate retail stores came in and said their landlords were not going to allow thein to continue their leases, wti1Lch would be no fault of their own, and be Vaarrted to tallow the noncollfbrminl; laws to tit,,:' -E2 with the store, to allow thele to continue on if they were a business in ;rod standing. Then Ih:: ❑t, discussion r,gardin, legal nonconforming lases and of the ultilnaLe goal at' the Ccmmissic>'atw:s. i:-, ,you have to make the three retail shcps nonconforming? Cc,t,lmissicncr :A:tde~rson said nc 1111t77.:.'trr, lite three eiit!:;t5 without making their. I a! nonconforming LI$CS, WI k -Ii %b'[Jllit: Iaruhtbit IILj ll; i:; i.i,ir'i,3 i `t: !ISCS. QGt:L:I E)f the State licensing rt: itte"e isn't way toILLst restrict three La our City, Sr, I,•L.,: to prralliltii' ..:tai use Ell!: Mill x,:1i:-'nttit:',_ 'w.;e1l tai':'7i5. Mr. Laid s nttmarircri tiro! 3:nr.1i::, •.,Il'. c] sir.:ddjrcuti 'rl t.: • r: i-,J3ua, I :.II:L'i:' is • • 1i more It".:Lrij lira I'wt<Lrl;:t?, I+I'".ciLLL_er5 OT 1}rocC550r$ • :o clubs ▪ ,',1 I10n i.'.1 :,:, [AIL look at the passibili[y+ of requiring the grower be the hoarse owner ▪ ] 1CI1iC4'X1'1AC:',ti;lj. C': I..,Ilis• Ltnet- SL;{}t' :I:.I;..1 if it was passible to restrict chemical extraction in alit Ci._,". Mr. t_21Lr:13 .:•LII : l: a+ H.0:7 i r.: sl,cak tC 1114 5t. bjccL, brit i❑ mined rheic ;irL oth•rr prc:c2sses .vi1l,:ll LIQ,::, t._'-:.n_:'I_, ••; li'.:I::.;;. :,�:'r. r.-.1.7tted tc mar.ltiiaz. girls. L-larv'c • said the :t:' rt r.;:tiana,le amount Allo `:nl.l'c ;•.Iii. h pr??ceEs 111 tial`.:r airy. ITflfl1 in control •vl' au: l:l]•::iriic:11:; Lt .I 'tili.l pirol'leatl$. t'.tilractiocn F.\tea, Ctio s at 'i trlti �Lrti LISI r.p. r11k}ting alcohol wli.'2lt is not likely' to be a but rlicrc ILS v.h.1 Lit a probletn with the ;r1: I=rr3k r 1,L:r,311C. Mot are using a 002 prUC,..73s Slat soH it was iii heti onti ely to SCC One of these tilcnis in a Iwuto bcc.tusu thol„..are expensive systc ns.:'csn lris::inu r :;L:11".ani .;cd clic would like tic see. Itt etc I:r;.LY 1,.. iii , L I,Ll;' iir2 a ad that they ct.n't :rc .Ca ti -Jin sI ricigltliLsr'S old. How 'r conic! I`ur'ic:ncr:l of this ilc:pIse:li. ()Illy after they were rei orrtt•' .I rltj: lint it was ;igrc:ed staifi will begin to draft regulations based on lilt Conlin agrueing this wt r1u directtoa they wanted the regLalali':,n6 hi move. Cunlrltimsici er graham asked abnur accomn:ntl,lilnt, the current business owners threicl llt_1 I LiI_. :It'.tl '.1r :ilr:[. s4ui14LI ;111 CCitlId be Cr :t • c[ keit chili ;:I?ul zoning woUkl not be allow:cr 4"ilii[":1!ti4i:iti .r ‘Vc.: I 01J...}t3t r -i l::'r5 vi'I had I,3`rr1issii ra 1• glow, and it was clarified this Weiler. be ;Wowed.rIir. Fc' l'.'�.Lti cuL'SL;li:L.S nott tiiC'I`.'L back 4vill, :_ .-_uuir:E .illuriitative to be able to tallow :Ls Ltrlst1flg me:diL::11 :,tor(.s (elis ��L,a:IriL: it. .a : r�rtin i erltt r.. it a inarj.'laar1Li Trow, or fl tedcrallt illegal activity,. was sornetliing which woL:lel 1.,::a [ t t;',: ;ii:mrl ::,. ; ', IIL n sclli11 ra'building_ Cori tissicuer Wood said he would say no,. but he felt 'IL',:', .:r:; ;kiln!) :.;::I .. ula9 4.'r.tr:le blain. mold ;'rIti.:h tvould he required to be disclosed. f„�:11Il111i-.:i rt'.'L --..� 1'_;' �'.:I'�l•: �l 1,L, I1�;: `,'r ]k tltc CE1, .c.oti I[i Iilsll;.r: :1 is requirement to inforltt or al liontc grow. I I .',I rr iIri' Sri tlttr rt. 12-1(1-15 L'Initning commission Wotan 1'9ni9 GOOD OF T[iE ORDER; Tlttre was a discussion regarding Planning Commissioners motes. Do they to be timed in to staff at the end of the year. These were their own nates, but Commissioners need to be aware they were subject ton public records requests. They should probably be destroyed at the end of each subject. ADJOURNMENT: There beim, co other business the meeting was ndjontriacd gat 8:53 a.trt. Kevie; ridetson, rperson :411; Deanna Horton. Secretary r� Date signed CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Planning Commission cion Meeting Date: February, 25, 2016 Tierra: Check ;all that .'apply': El consent. ❑ old :11rsilu:s,s Ej new ❑ publi4 hearing r?»nrt ❑ l cndi,::_ t},i l;l i, l', Fi l.F. CTA -2015-0t706 �t„;EtNDA ITEM TITLE: Study session - Comprehensive °iarijuankI 1Zq.a:l1:U•c•ii; 1.)1.; CR1PTtc}iti OF' PROPOSAL: text amendment to the Spink: r1 'S' i I4 y iunicipeal C:)dC 050, and Appendix F lo ad{. :LC1lt'it1C111s rcgarding, marijuana usc..:, : liro.1:1'iI ;111 1:'rll ll?I;l.`,.1 11h k, tncluciiii production, processing, .:oop:2Talives, rind 4'.1x1Ir( 111 i1.}, and tea provide additional regulations for :Indi ty}' qualified patierltsand designated providers for iiC l:{'•r::l Its 11. r_.LA14_11CR11 GOVERNING LEG1ISLATION: RCVk' 69.51A; SVMC 11.80.I5O and 19.3(1040; SVNIC 19.55_ SVMC PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: City Council has ,1Joprcd in n".:C I9.12o.Oi1 and SVMC 14.55 for the zcrling and bu fcritlr, l7:" rccrcatio ial rnarijur.na. Ori 1'.ccclnhcr 9, 24'.4, Council adopted a moratorium on unlicensed marij1od..mt Li: c ("prin1t111Iv 1114x11 .r 111:1ri1ut1:1'! Y_ C` rt ~'i.rsll 'r 5. 2015, City Crooned adopted a moratorium or. '1'.n1'lllraIEI 1 Il;'.tl}r 111[1 Cannabis foam (`WS1.C13"). P]anr:ing ColtlniisskOn coltducrcd study sessions on Odtc ltc7 2`', 2013, November 11, 2015, and December 10. 2015. BACKGROUND: The City is in the pmcess of developing comprehensive lacai rnariju tra regulations. as required pursuant to moratoriums as described in the Staff Report. The Planning Commission conducted study sessions on October 22, 2015. November 12, 2015, end December 10, 2015- At those study sessions, Cornmissit ri receiver. information from staff regarding recent changes iv State lau.•, ongoing rulcniaking by the Washington Liquor and C:aonabis Board (WSLCB) and Vtieshingtari Department of Health, testimony from the public, information from Spokane Valley Police and Spokane Valley Fire, and a range of various types of available options. Further, Planning Commission considered various options and ultimately, gave a consensus for staff to draft proposed amerldinent language that would ban all new mariivana. U&Es, allow hams: growing, require neliee by renters to landlords for home growing, and ban home extraction. Planning Commission will now be uori i wring draft ,amendments that would ,mend chapter 19.85 SVMC, SViv1C 19.120.050, and Appendix A by (1 ) adding definitions Ibr nitcl,c,il 11t'rriji ane endorsed retail stores, marijuana cnoperntivcs, and marijuana clubs, (2) prohibiiiinz ftny 110k 11i'Cr1 0'd na riju$na production, processing, Or retail stores from al] acnes, (3) prollihitin marijuana tiou"p, r: lives from all zone;, (1) prohibiting marijuana dubs or lounges from all zones, and (5) requiring qualified parients as allowed by state law to be conducted only in single fanlil: r :.1 1. nr1.31 ,1 tie": i1t permanent structures that are apaquo rad not visible by neighbors or from the p11h}i : l; i t, :y1 w l?,' ,: ,,i 1,, ;:kl,'l ir',cil nonce iu Lt iL ;}r 'C' '4 r0. `.k' 111Ji ij i li'a pl311Tti in i rondo' dwc1L11'.a. 4:Ic:r LllnS14 '.1!! iri 1)1 ti;l: (,;rr l.r.li ,1[s11 + i?i canc'-u _t ri x111'7111' he',Lr111', L111 ,'�i ch 24. 2016. For informational purpcsc , From the prior study sessions have been included as attaclianents to this RCPA NOTICE. Notice for the proposed amendment; will be prcvkkd to the Spokane Valley Netia }feratti in accordance with the requirunents or Title 17 SVMC. APPROVAL CRITERIA; SVMC Section 1.7.8O.15' (F) I,ro% cri'erL. for text amendments to the SVMC, The criterion stipulates that the prronn,;u;l ;117::;11.11[1:!111.[:;i• iii.. b.' : •i iti: st. w. lith t r_ applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan niid 'hi 1r ,; ..klHisrnriaJ NI,itRAI safety, welfare, and protection or the environment. RECOMIVIEI DEI) ACTION OR MOTION: No aciiol'I rccorincndcd at this time. lite P•.kinniii Commission will conduct a public 1ivring and consider the P1'LF1'}c sed iitiicaciment Lirt ? 1:irLli 24; 2016. STAFF CONTACT: Christina Janssen — Planner Jenny Nickerson — Senii r Plans Examiner Erik Lamb -- Dt:lauty City Attorney ATTACHMENTSi A. Staff Report, including copes of Ordinari Nos. 1,1-021 and 15-017 B. Proposed amendments to chapter 19.85 SVNIC, SVMC 19120.050_ acid Appendix A C. Copy of RSPCA from C letob::r «', 2015 D. Copy of RPCA from November 12.. 2015 meeting E. Copy of FPGA, from December 10, 2015 meeting F. Copy of minutes from October 27, 2015, November 12, 2015, and December 10, 2015 meetings G, Police crime tracking information requested at December 10.. 2015 Meeting Chair Graham called pledge of allegiance. staff were present: Kevin Anderson Heather Graham Junes Johnsoin Tim Kelley Mike Philips Suzanne Statins Joe Stoy &PP RQV El) Minutes Spokane Valley Plaaning Commission Council Chambers — City hall, February 25, 2016 the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Commissioners, staff and audience stood fur the Administrative Assistant Deanna Horton took rail and the following members aad E ril; Lamb, IDep1:r,:„.C i t .+I tr +ley Senior 1$Er:ns'.er C I21':7tllt:f .I211.SSC71, Planner Kar_rr L.. ndu'.I. 131a:trier Deanna Horton, Secretary of the Commission Corrrertr,5stoner , fn , erdr'e'i! f,-; tiiC ;7; !rat i:(2,1).,./1(12) =01+ td''r'.' : is ::r,Ypm.yenled. The vote G}! the 330t'ron it'as favor, zero cr eiri:•st : r �a+ 1'11t,2 u'r ' cJlr PL.'..i 7c1 Commissioner Roy moved i ' e,:pptove the '"n 'r.un i J. 2'] i o.ti they were pre.c '.; 7ft'd. The vote On the Th,101/012 5t'CdSYei£r7 1q f(r4'Oa'„ zcrf) tt&°'JP.V.'1 COMMISSION REPORTS: Cemmissi•.mer Kelly rept*.tt:;: Esq; 411ty;iilci t}:. TraRr's CIA1 meeting The other Commissioners had no reports. A 131r'IT14lIST RAT1 REPORT: Staff ]tiad no re. poris. PUBLIC COivlg'IENT: No public comments. COMMISSION BUSINESS: A. Public Hearing: CPA -2016-1001, A privately propm-:cd Comprehensive Plan Amendment, near Elizabeth and Utah, requesting a change frr'rrl Low Density Residential to Light Industrial. Chair Graham opened the public hearing at 5:07 p.m. Planner Karen Kendall gave a presentation regarding the privately proposed CDrnprchensivse Plan amendment;. CPA -2016-0001. That proposal is to change seven parcels otimed by Avi•sta located along Elizabeth Road from Low Density Residential (LDR) b Light Industrial (LI). Arista owns the parcel to the west of the request, on which they have a natural gas equipment yard. Avista proposes to expand their natural gas storage facility in this area. Ms. Kendal! noted she had received one comment letter from Ivlark Zink, 2420 N. Elizabeth. Ms. Kendall said she had some answers to gileStiCILS from die study session_ She slid one queslian was the width of the right-cr--way (ROW) the avhitlt of Utah is approximately 30 feet wide, Elizabeth is appro: imatcly 40 feet wide with 3C feet of pa'ernct t, N1.s. Kcttcall grid auuthrcr question was regarding appronchcs. The City's street standards WaLld apply at the time of development, but each parcel could have a maximum of two approaches but would need to meet the standard. Ms. Kendall said tht: parcels may be small cnaugh they could only ::ave one approach. Only if access was taken off of Elizabeth would floatage improvements be aaeceE;ary including curb, sidewalks and swales. Ms. Kendall contacted the Spokane Valley File raTt.. regarding response times, they indicated when a call conies in they notify the closest true; for any emergency response call. This would he any emergency call which came into the departmvl:t. The department cocks have a ha.z-mat response unit, but it for larger spills. Commissioner Johnson asked if there were rto approaches installed along Elizabeth, that a,1.;i' l.incE of improvements would be required. Ms. Kendall responded she could not tell at this would be something whet would Lie determined at the time of future development in depend on what was being aroposcd by the applicatu, Commissioner Stcy asked if would have to be enreMg:rted into one. Ms. Kendall stated it would not be :ariaiced. 02.2546 Planning ComtnbsianlvIinutcs Pae ofd Eton Staten, Avista Facilities Manager: Mr. Stators said Avista purehr<scd the property which fronts Dollar Road in the mid 90's and began :ransiticnting the natural gras storage to this Facility because of ower -crowding rat the Mission location. lig 2008 and 2009 Avi5tt1 purchased the adjoining properties ottd built a fleet maintenance briiiding. in 24]4 and 2015 Avista scat letters to the property owners along Elizabeth to ingatire if they 'Cr' interested in selling. Seven of the lots were sold to Avista along Elizabeth Road, one property ipwrier was not interesting in selling. Avista also purchased a triarialc shaped piece in the mien; of their property. Avista is proposing to change the zoning to Light industrial. They aregoing to use the property or storage of natural gas pipe. Mr. Staten said this was a norlaprojecc related request, meurting Avista docs not have a specific project corning up in which they need a place to store extra pipe. Aw.is!a is out of room in their Mission Avenue storage area and need more room to grow their operations. They need more morn to be able to store. all the pipe, aliow for e,ontraotors to came and m2ateaiver iaa the yard with room to grow for future growth. Mr. Stator said Avista was not apposed to all of the properties in the roti., including the one they did not purchase being Wined the same, Mr. Seaton saki Avista works with thr; building and planning departments to be a good neighbor and make improvements which arc requircd when developing a property. iNtr. Station commented on tlae intpra emettts Avista had made on latah. Mr. Staten said one of the properties had a dump site on it, which Avista 5puit S65,+000 to r;1_nra up. Mr. Staten said Avista is a quiet neighbor, the crews came in and leave the yard around 7:]0 in the morning, the,a room around 3:30 in the afternoon, and there are is nothing wing on a: tate property at night. L -k said Avista has no desire to build along Elizabeth Road. All or the trucks exit the current facility out of Utah or Dollar and travel out of the neighborhood on those roads. Crary mi... si iier ,Grder;sdrt asked if there is ire projzcr wiJear aril) happen to the property, Mr. Staton replied the purchases came about because the site was running out or acorn to store natural ;as pilOin . Avista would like to install some asphalt and begin to store additional pipe on it. They are going to acquire the proper permits and do whatever is necessary to make this possible. Commissioner Almon asked aka:rt the soil resliiPg and lead levels. Mr. Station responded Avista had removed IA dump truck loads of old_ hike parts, washing machines, car parts and other old metal painted items, along with a lot of other debris. Mr. Staton felt the lead levels were from the old lead based pints fro -n the old parts in the 'neighborhood dump.' Cortrr><rissioner• Saoy c keel if there wasenough wooer oil the site for Avrsrcr's needs. Mr. Stator, said they fel: this should be enough storage space for the next 20. years. there is no natural gas stored on the site, only pipe, meter assembly sets, meter repair, gas lines. Commissioner. Berthas risked y. they wound continue to only store pipingo+r rirepr•vpnr•.ry. Mr. Stators replied Avista has an internal environmental department and it is very important to them to bz in compliance with all the required standards. Co rtrrrisrirmer Graham asked (hoar a curvy pwperry ti„c herr,,o.car rig flee! rrrurrrter.ulrce facility oral Me Elizabeth Road properties, and were METE' rimy ethCr ;31ac :°,i r;�rar ar Ainsta was staring rcrrrural gcrs piping, Mr, Stators said the curvy litre is a pi as ut protta'ra purchased from the railroad, there arc nothing other natural gas pipe storage facilities t arra ].a northern Idaho. Chair Graham then :i.kred for testimony from the public. Mark Zink, 2420 N ta'Iii;ibilli Road: Mr. Zink said he was concerned about what would happen along Elizabeth Road, but that Mr. Staton had answe:ed most of his questions, He raid he was aware raf the improvements which had occurred on Utah and lie was happy with that. He wandered what kind of al timeline there would be for the improvements. [Via rk Shalleoiberger, 2205 N Bradley Road: Mr. Sho1Ier taerget said the only acres: would be on to Utah and down Dollar Road. He said that is not true, that every morning ana every night, the trucks are coming down Bradley, Dollar Read is backed up and so they use Bradley to get around the problem. Mr, Shollcnberyer said he bed brought this up when the SCRAPS facility was being proposed. He said there used to be a sign which said no trucks allowed, however someone hit it and the county came out and instead of putting it back up, they just took it away. He says he has ci Iled Inde enforcement andthey have done nething about the many dead cats, dogs and squirrels caused by the tracks coming down the road. He is concerned that this will just increase itte number of trucks corning Frnrn Avista, along with ,'4lutual Materials and Standard Battery. 0--2546 Planning Commission %Chutes Page 3 of 4 Buddy Meaglen 2 014 11 Elizabeth Road: Mr, Meagley stated his daughter was buying the property whiryh was the pie piece. AViSIu did not own. His vrtrs concerned the rezoning '..mild make the property taxes go ❑p. 1 l also stated he would net be very happy if he had to look oat the yellow pipe all the time. Rots Statnn, Avisia Facilities Manager: Mr. Staten said he would be calling the facility ininui and hove the strivers stop dri'ir.a down Bradley. He would support the repeating of the `tic trrlcks' sign on Bradley as well. Mr, Staten said he will be happy to comply with whatever standards' Tiro necessary' as they move forward. They do net have tti; large project !braving forward, adieu than replacing old pipe which was put dawn in the 7O's, ale also said there is a brick hvu5c an the comer and there will be scrrteene living in it until May. During the study session the sale ari the corner property was not final, Mr. Statan said lie sale was completed this day and all the cars lata been removed from the property, hawing iw one aisa wrlio wished ur (nab, Cha). Graham Ciesed the ,public teserttrarty al 6:35 p.m. CarrrrnfssPortcr Srap moved ra revoornenalappa°ovai ofCAsl-2016-0001_ Commissioner Graham asked if the flea maintenance property was bought and improved in 2009 why wasn't a fence put along the properties en Elizabeth. Planner Christina Janssen explained that at the time of the development, the `curvy' piece of property between the Eli zabela. Road properties and the neut. mrtir3tc:nuncc property was owned Ihv the rail road and so it was no: regtaircd a that time_ CommissionerJohnson said, if this were not approved for Light industrial but was combined for residential, there could he 23 homey btelt upon the same around and that would be verse than what Avesta wanted to do to it, Conunissiorte, Julaisan said he felt that the recommendation should be b straight line the recommendation anti not lag around the one parcel. Commissioner Phillip said, if the zoning was different on the one parcel, Avista would have to fence around k, if it was the sante zoning„ thea they ..+-ould not. Commissioner Stoy asked Jr the zoning was changed to be a straight line for alt Ells lots, wotiid the landscaping buffers and setback apply because it was a residential use on the praperty. Ms. Barlow said the code protects the zones, not the individual uses. Commissioner Phillips said he would ordinarily be in favor of including the extra lot it the request but in this case he wculc prefer to go around it to protect the buffers Would apply. Commissioner Kelley said he would be in favor of including the other parcel ie the request. Comrnissiorw Graham said she was not in favor of blanket zoning, and would rather leave the miler lot as R-2. She said she had concerns about the project but would support it if the other commissioners did, She said she was glad to hear ,5,vista was willing to put up a fence, but knows they need a place to store the pipe. Commissioner Johstsor, said he would support the one lot remaining residential. Commissioner Kelley said he had char,gied his rnirrd and he. would support the one lot remaining residential. The rote on the mrwinnr 1 •a saiasn lrrfe21 or', tern aguinsr, tfre ruoilaa passed.. B, Study Session CTA -2015.0006 proposed amendment to Strrak:arre Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 19.85 Marijuana 'Uses, 19.120.054 Permitted Use Matrix and Appendix A Definitions Deputy Criyr Attorney Erik Lamb stated the Commission had discussed Ilio oranges to the state marijuana regulations in order to bring the medieval marijuana businesses under regulation. The state has aligned the regulations for `medical' to be more iii line with. those of the r:creatinnal rrt arij u aha, Commissioner Anderson said he understood that there will be no `medical' marijuana., there will only by compliant and non-compliant marijuana. Fie offered the retail stores will rcyuire a spacial license, utaining, labeling and tracking for the compliant marijuana. Commissioner Cita:ham confirmed the five collectives currently selling `medical' marijuana can apply for a retail license or they must stop doing business as of .iuly t this year. Mr. Lamb also confirmed with the current moratorium in place, the state did not issue the City any new retail opportunities. Bassa' 011 the way the state was allocating new Zona around the state, Mr, Lamb said he expected without the rrtarntariurn, the City would probably have been given three more r e: oil ;: }r :: Go aoeammodate the D] -25•i6 Planning Con nigsfonMirLacs t'age4oE1 change in regulations for the compliant marijuana. People could apply for the new licenses, however priority would be given to those who have been running* collective. The ettrr❑tit recornrnendatica from the Planning Commission was to not allow any additional retail stores o any more producers or pr censors and to ban any kind or club. Corninissioncr Kelley confirmed the Commission also wanted to expand the &oilers to the maximum allowable between retail stores, should in the induce the state say the cities cannot prohibit marijuana stores. Th:rc was discussion of' t}:e taxes collected from the marijuana; the City last year received $75,GDo in exoise taxes from marijuana, along with any sales taxes. Thcsc t'urtds are not car -marked For any specifically, except lll% at the stage level is to be used for education. Commissioner Anderson asked if there was anything in the state bring looked at fake this related to home grown alcohol, Mr. Lamb was not aware of any. Commissioner Anderson said 13e would consider allowing additional compliant marijuana shares, but no more recreational marijuana stores, He also felt that the compliant marijuana should be required to be separated from the recreational by a physical barrier. Commissioner Johnson said Mr. Lamb explained there would be no legal basis for the. City to require an operation to be: compliant cn1y or to require a retail store to separate their complaint and non-compliant operations with a physical barrier, i.Ir. Lamb said .f the Commissioners }vantod t4 allow additional `medical' or compliant stores they would need to allow more retail operations which allowed recreational as well. Commissioner Johnson said this would be a tine way to help with control of younger patients, but people 4f age were going to be able to go into a stare and purchase whatever they would want tc, 1 -le feels prescription drugs were a la:l er problem and there should be a clear perspective en •.uhat is trying to be accomplished. Commissioner Kelley commented the state of Massachusetts is trying to develop a presc.ription drug puncam. Commissioner Graham stated that a.5 a school nurse she feels there is a transition rram marijuana to other drugs. She feels there is a transition taking place now from marijuana hapin. She Feels the mistake being made is not providing enough education. S}te said she is seeing an upswing in children using e -cigarettes and underage drinking. Ms, Barlow stated there is art opportunity, if the Commissioners would like to take it, for the Commission to tour a producin&processing facility es well as n retail operation. If there is interest staff can set up a special meeting and make arrangements to facilitate this field trip. Thursday March 3, 2016 at 5:34 p,ri. has agreed upon for the field trip. GOOD OF THE ORDER: There was nothing for the good of the order. ADJOURNMENT: There being no other business the meeting was adjourned at b: 1.7 p.m. Chair Graham Deanna Horton, Secretary 0/L Date signed Chair Graham called pledge of allegiance. staff were present: Kevin Anderson Heather Graham lames Jollcison Tim Kelley Mike Phillips Su:win-Le Stathas Jae 5toy APPROVED Minutes Special Meeting Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers — City Hall, March a. 2016 the meeting to order at 5:32 p.m. Commissioners, stuff and audience stood for the Administrative Assistant Deanna l -Corton tool: roil and the Following members and Erik Lamb, Deputy Cir•: Attorney Lori BnrIow, Senior Ptanner Chr.stin . Janssen, Planner Jenny Nickerson, Senior Plans Exatni ier Deanna 'Horton, Secretary of the Commission CO 14 MISSION BUSINESS: Y The meeting was recessed while the Cidik411L ICi;1 and Sz.\•• 1 I ;Iicrnla 3' .1 ;I 1..11 'i:io :if the Following marijuana facilities: • grow Op Farm located at 2 L i N Woodruff. This Facility tiva.,: ;;: •L a ..,..eind:.:;HLI i=..:: ` 7, the site. It was commented this is the highest-producihQ, facility in doth} �Iic Er. a shir z ton but very nondescript from the exterior • Toured L riftboat production/processing Facility located at 15141 E L uclirl ::,l lie , Manager Stan Fong and property owner Pail IE ielec discussed the operations loLatu cl at this facility ▪ Visited Locals ettruta House retail facility located at 9415 F., Spraizuc Avenue where we were immediately asked for our identification and spokc to 1 -sip owner lou Pederson about his operations. • Connnissioners and staff then returned to City I-lk11- ADJOURNMENT: There being no other business the eteecririg was adjourned at 7:55 p.m. 1/i_kkfrrTh' ',PIN `-',e!,W1--) I co Chair Graham Date signed ')("02 Deanna Horton, Secretary CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Planning Commission Action :Flection Dine: March 10. 21116 !tern.: check an that apply: FILE NUMRER: CTA -20I,6 -(0I1 I L. 1 k'•rt it .,. (p...w. .. new basilic:is rt.:i Clilt:_ I is1.16i�tir° AGENDA Pl'Ei t 'TITLE: Study session — Comprehensive Mairijuana Regulations (continued from i-drruary 2=t: 2016) DESC'1ZJPTf4k initiated code lex: amendment to the Spoltane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) chapter 19.85, SVMC 19.120.0511, and Appendix A to add definitions regarding marijuana uses, prohibit all new r::1.irijuana uses, including production, proccsbin. retail, cooperatives, and clubs from any zones within =.112. City, and to provide additional regulations for pn.duction and processing c'f home-grown rnarjuana by qualified patients and de ig,nated prnviders for personal use in residential zones_ COYER1NING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A.136: RCW 69,50 (codifying Initiative 502); RCCW 69.51A; SVMC 17,80.150 End 19.30.040; SVMC 19.85; SVMC 19.120.050 PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: Cite Crarrrtcil has aioptal regulations as set forth in SVMC 19.120,050 and SVMC 19.85 for die zoning arid buffering or recreational marijuana. On December 9, 2014, City Council adopted a attnratorirarn on unlicensed marijuana uses (primarily medical marijuana). On October 2015, City Council adopted a moratorium on mar.juar.a rises licensed by the Washington Liquor and Cannabis Board (:{W'SLCE"). Planning Commission conducted study sessions en October 22, 2013, November 12, 2015, December 10, 2015, and February 25, 2016 . Planning Commission visited a prnductioniprocessing Facility and retail facility on March 3, 2016_ BACKGROUND: The City is in the process of developing comprehensive local marijuana regulations, as required pursuant to moratoriums as described in the Staff Report. The Planning Commission conduced study sessions on October 22, 2015, November 12, 2015, and December 10, 2015, At those study sessions, Planning Com"' icion received information troll staff regarding reccrlt changes to State law, ongoing reternaking h. tile Washington Liquor and Cannabis Board (WSLCR) and Washington Department of Health, testimony from the public, inforriltf n from Spokane Valley Police and Spokane Valley Fire, and a range of various types ofavailable options, Further, Planning Commission considered various a.1 -icons and ultimately gave a consensus for staff to draft proposed arnendment language that would bars all new marijuana .rses, allow home growing. require nolite hy renters to landlords for borne growing; and bun bonne extraction. Planning Commission will now be considering draft amendments that would amend chapter 1955 SV 1C, SVMC 19,120.050, and Appendix A by (1) adding definitions for medical marijuana endorsed retail stoles, marijuana LTOperatives, and marijuana clubs„ (2) prohibiting any new licensed marijuana production, prucessing, or retail stores from all zones, (3) prohibiting marijuana cooperatives From all Lodes, (4) prohibiting marijuana clubs or lounges from all zones, and (3) requiring any home -growing by qualified patients as allowed by s*.ate law to be conducted only in single family residential zones in permanent structures that arc opaque and not visible by neighbors or from the public rights-of-way, and to clarify that renters may be required, As linty be authorized by federal, state, and local laws, to give notice to landlords or their intention to grow marijuana plats in a i etnt,atl dwelling. A copy of proposed amendments were distributed at the February 25, 2016 meeting. Staff has updated those amendments for grammatical issues, consistency with the existing Spokane Valley 1'lunieipal C-.0de, and to incorporate. legislative proposals that aro: not moving forward this session (specifically, the "marijuana lounge definition was deleted), The changes are highlighted in yellow. After consideration ofthe study session, Planning Cotnnlission will conduct a public hearing on April 14, 2al6. Por int'nrrnationat purpcasc t, all innformation provided as part of the packet for the Fehruary 2i study scion lvts been included with this RCPA.. NOTICE: Notice for the proposed ametrclments will be provided to the Cf: hylic, !-riNc•-• _Vc.w•s . ra! d in accordance with the requirements of T tle 17 SV MC, APPROVAL CRITERIA: SVM.0 Scution 17.84.I5D(F) provides appr•t-Aal crim—il. f`ta- tic'!':t :1:;rzndmcins to the SV.MC. The criterion stipulates tltnt tl c prr,pc sed 7mendmerr.(] t tri , he consi ent +s.itlt tl ti: applicable provisions of the Contlarellensive Plan ;rid bear a substantial ?elation to :lte 1tii,` li I1e:111h.. safety, weifate, and protection f the env irc>nn-.e:tt. R-ECO14M-ENDED -AC ION OR MDT TON:No acs_ NI recommended al tliis time. The FIffrrat,a Commission will conduct a public Lluaring and consider tl,ie proposed amendments ort April I.1. x(11 i,. STAFF CONTACT: Christina Jansen — Planner Jenny Nickerson — Senior Plans Examiner Erik Lamb — Deputy City Attorney AT'1fACHM1 NTS: A. Staff Report, including copies of 'idistance 1.1-0121 encs 15-017 0 Proposed updated amendments to chapter 19.85 V NtC, SVMC 19,120.050, and Appendix A 13. Copy of RPCA from October 22, 2015 C. Copy of RPCA from November 12, 2015 meeting D. Copy orRPCA from December 10, 2015 meeting E. Copy of R.1'CA from February 25, 201 nxucting E. Copy, of minutes from October 22, 2015, November 12, 2015: rind December 10, 2015 rneelinss F. Police crime tracking information requested at December 10, 2015 meeting APPROVED D Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Com mi;siinn Connell Charubtrs -- City Hall, I Larch 10, 2416 Chair Graham called the rieeti:r4 to order at 6:00 p.m. Commissioner$, Staff and audience stood far the pledge of allegiance. Administrative Assistant Deanna 1 -lira took roll and the following members and staff were present: Kevin Anderson Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney 1-1eather C'irahaar7 Lori Barlow, Senior Plattner James Johnson Karen Kendall, Panner I'iin Kelley Mike Phillips S:aranne Stathos .ins; Sray, absent excused LT)eaiiw.1 E l;rrr: i . Secretary attic Commission ln) ',(MH;:a+".'. r ";�'• .';1 7S LYtraC"{i rrv19d r!le c1 rCai' "+d JO, 0,16 mii'a,2fln . Yr, ,.r:..r, :rtr + .; .) :FCs •; r?ar` A14-'a'i..k 1 2.4)16 itrtia'YxrCJ ers „•.'.:.'!.!; .. .'r;.. e("ro :rr': a?!�� LVI ,fir?''!(.oed { .I'arYYrfs.s on r.4YMf<'i'.S'r1+ "i ...°.i lv (li' "f•'. _.' (rid' ' Yd?r1Y): 7 , 20) 0 4,1irral/i'?' '+1' t£i'v fir''.re f'!' 1'li.j(?, '.'r+1r• r111 the motion was sfx fav 1=r -OI', ve)"r! '_ :;';:ir rsf, !ht 9106011 faxfa.pc'if CO:MNIISSIOM REPORTS: 'i'he Comm: iG" 's hurt m. reports. ADMINISTRATIV.F REPORT: SeniorPlannerLoti Barlow reporlecl the cite -f I i1 cri . a Planning Short Courst on _l i i1 27, 201,6. She said ii'aray'of the Cointninsion '3 a;'.::rtir,r_ to let. Ms. I-lorto'Z know and S:tti: would assist them in their rc _isirarion. PUBLIC COMMENT: ]here were no public GC.r`.am_nts. COMMISSION BUSINESS: A. Planning Ctam>aissiora Findings: CP'A-2016-00011, A privately prrrpnsed Cornprehen ii{" I't,an Amendment, near Elizabeth and Utah, requesting a ch:ran c from Low' Density' Re'irti ntiat to Light Industrial. Planner Karen Kendall reviewed the Planning Commission's roan igs from the public hearing held February 25, 2016. on the priivaLely proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment, CPA -2t115-]]001. The Planning Commission rounds the proposed amendment was consistent with the approval criteria in the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 17.30.140(H), it is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, and will promote .he health, safety, welfare and protection °fate environment. Cominiysioner Anderson moved w approve the Nanning Ccundnissinttfindings for C.T4-2616-0OO.1,. The vole on the rraoriaa+r was- in favor, zero against, the motion passed. B. Study Session — CTA -2415-11006 proposed amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Cade (SVMC) 19.35 Marijuana Uses, 19.120.050 Permittedd-Use Matrix and Appendix A Definitions Deputy City Attorney Erik ].arab stated the Commission had previously discussed the changes co the slate marijuaiaa regulations in order to bring the medical marijuana businesses under regulation. The state has aligned the regulations for `medical' to be more in ]inc with those of the recreational marijuana. Mr. Lamb rev icwed the proposed changes to the SVMC. The definitions have been updated ro rel"leet the current state RCtW's. Also, they will he cur.•era when the state updates its definitions as curs will be op -dated by reference. Section 19,1 r . i 1 Form hied Use M atrhas been updated to remove any S' which means permitted with supplemental conditions. These uses are no longer permitted, but the reference to SVMC 19.85 in the `=supplemental conditions' will still exist to direct users to SVMC 19 R5 far rererenco talc additional marijuana regulations. Also, existing lawful tiSeS wall be legal nonconforming uses which will still be allov,td to continue. 03-1(1.16 ntnnninggCwnriBsion Minutes Naga. 2 ar 3 Section 19.85 hats been, updated to reflect the Ccarnntission's desire to prohibit any new prodLLdli«n, processing and retail sales in the City. A section has been added to address the collectkncs which allows home grows fur ineividuals with a medical endorsement. There is a resirictioi �'c• combustible type of processing in a home grow situation. Rutile grovvie . is limited to re:cirlerttial 14- through R.4 zones only. Mr, Lamb said the public hearing is set for April 14, 2016. Commissioner Anderson raised a question regarding taxes. Mr. Lamb explained the etiLisW t.rx on marijuana sales is 37%, which does not ittciticle sales tax. The City is allocated an aattnial 1rr the excise rax based on the number 4it retail stare; the City has. Last year the City renzived approximately $75,O00 from the marijuana sales. An authorization card gives Kt patient relief iiom those taxes. Commissioner Anderson asked if hat included the sales tax is well, Mr. Lamb said he would have to check into that. Commissioner Kelley shared an article from the Seattle Times, written by Bob Young, from Monday February 15, 2016. He said ht; had read this arrticle and it acitiresaed the use of unacceptable pesticides so rue growers have been using en marijuana plants. Commissioner Kelley said he brought tie article because lie herd brought up pesticides during the tour and varied to bring the information and share it v,itlt the rest of the Commission. Commissioner Kollo" said there is no way to know right noi. whiwh pestiei(le5 are safe, and he feels V:iere should be a 'slow go' philosophy, He said until these safery issues can he worked out the City should not rush into allowing more businesses before the safety issues are: kno...4m. Commissioner Anderson shared a spreadsheet he created after tory ing to understand the compliant vs. recreatioital and when :an authorization card was needed. Commissioner Graham, said ,she was surpriistd ai ]rove close elle retail shop, which Ole Commission visited on March 3, 2016, was to a bar. Slty w uiiccl t{, kr-r~w `i, it 1ki .. possible to place a restriction an horn close a retail store was to :t marijuana retrai shop. Ske a.su WLrtt d to know ifa retail shop was required to "not sell" to someone 1.aho Jim:e ared to lir impaired, Mr. Lamb confirmed it was possible to restrict the location of a retail shop, but he V.or.ld need to check regarding selling lc: someone who was impaired, Commissioner Juhuvcan titikeci why it would be a prcblena if a retail shop was next to a bar, Mary times there is a bar rrtxt to a i5.ar, incl this is riot much different, except you can't consume the product on site. I -le offered clic of the sites viaited was employing just over 100 people and they would like to doable; than figure, but they can't because of our current moratorium_ They also would not be able tta do i: with the way the regulations are currently drafted. He Felt that cigarettes and alcohol were more gateway to harder things and much easier to gel than marijuana, The companies which wcra visited wore clsan, generating jobs anti revenue for the City, He fel this was important as well. Commissioner Jnlioson acknowledged Commissioner Graham, being a school nurse, probably saw worse issate:s ire the schools' Stem than he did- But funds to provide education, education materials, teachers, and nurses, s, was under high demand all around the state. Corninissioner Kelley said just because the state approved marijuana doesn't •mean we Should Open the floodgate. He said the people in the community can make a I ivirig, people can hu5 it here, but he felt there 31iould be no more allowed in the City until there is a better understanding of it. Tho Commissioners askew] about chemical extraction, Ms. Jenny Nickersort. Sr. Plans Examiner, said currently there have been no requests for chemical extraction in the City. Chemical extraction would not be allowed in a residential zone. els. Barlow asked if the Ccnnmissianers felt there was benefit from the field trip which toured a marijuana producerfpn::Ce nr and retail shop, Tile majority of the Commissioocr.5 agreed they found some benefit in the tour, t1'. v Ie.i-,-red thin! li. ; had i-anndered about, i.e.: size al plants. how they ere processed, and howti, LI is pac,:a LPJ under ttltuding o1' the use as a business, However, C._ rir:r:is •iLu_r I . I.v r-rli.. rl s l Ii;:• was di appoiriteci in ;he eAperitnce+- GOOD OF THF ORDER: There' is notI' icsi th,s• , JOURNt' LENT: There 1r)c , :rte other husines :Ir: i;ix:L c lett 4":;:. _ 4it' urned at 7:02 p.tn. 43 -I4 -I6 Planning Commission lfiauh�:; PAQC 3 of Chair Graham • Deanna Florton, Secrccary ke 7(4 Date simud (ITN SI°fKANkr_ f eqttcsst l pr 1'Iatarlin r C,CMnaijiission Action !Lite: Ape I 11.x, Item: Cheek all Shat apply; J li."t',' 17 r, tilt :ti 11c3r'llig 14 ri I Cr1RlC 1. r relf:r; Icvi l:ui•. FILL NUMBER: CT ,\ ="ll t-t.s}t, AGENDA. ITEM TITLE. Public I Ic {. omprrhen;iae 1V(arijuana Regulations D€SC'TION OF PROPOSAL: City initiated code text amendment tiac Spokane. Valley Municipal Crate SVMC 14.120.050, and r'tp cndir A t+, add ti l��iiii�latis regarding nt,atijeiann lytic , pr lri!:'i' .L1.1 nc•t, marijuana uses, including production, processing, retail, cooperatives, art cltihs from .tlttic7 the City, and to provide additional regulations for production kind processlog at L'i roe•-s.i :r •+ n nal IIuan;: by qualified patients and desigmatcd providers for personal use in residential comes, GOVERNING LF.GI LAT1Q\. RCW 36.7iA.106; KCW 69.50 (oodifyiii lrtiii4Ci, i1�7�. I C''A' 69.51A; SVMC 17.80.150 and 1930,040; SVMC 19.65; SVMC 19.120.05D PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: City Council leas adopted regulations us sof forth in SV 41C l9.I20.0,', 1 and SVMC 19.85 for the zoning and bufferirtg of rccrcatioiial marijuana. On December 9, 2014, Cite Council adopted a Moratorium on unlicensed marijuana uses (primarily- medical marijuana). On October 6, 2015, City Council adopted a moratorium on marijuana uses licensed by the Washington Liqu:ir and Cannabis Board ("WSLCi3"), Planning Commission conducted study sessions on October 22, 21)15. November 12, 2015. December 4, 2015, and February 25, 2016. Planning Commission visited n procluc.til n/processing facility and retail facility on March 3: 2016. Planning Cttmtnissioct conducted subsegment study session or. March 10, 206. BACKGROUND: The City is in the pros of developing comprehensive local marijuana regulations, as required pursuant to moratoriums as described in the Staff Report. The Planning Commission conducted background study sessions on October 2,7, .70': 5. November 12, 2015, and December 10, 2015. Al those study sessions, Planning Commission received information from staff rc irding recant change to State Law, ongoing rulernakin, by the Vi+ashing,ten Liquor and Cannabis 13raurd (WSLC13) arid Washington Department of Health, testimony from the public, information from Spokane Valley Portico and Spokane Valley Fire, and a range of various types of available options. Planning Commission also visited a annrijuarta production/processing operation and retail store an March 3, 2016. Planning Commission considered various options and ultimately gave a consensus for st.iI'f TO draft proposed Amendment language that would lima rt:1 new rnarij.inna uses, allow home growing. require notice by renters to landlords f, r llortic i,rcwirtg, and nan horrre extraction. Vol 4.ie, the recommendation from Planning Con -mission, 3t tff has drafted proposed antendmerrts, '. iL k1 were discussed briefly at the meeting or, l"1:b1'uar-r• 25, 2016 and again during, a study session on March 10, 2016. Planning Commission Will row be considering draft arrterldments that would artrend chapter 19.85 SVMC, SVMC 19.120.050, and Appendix A by (1) adding definitiions for medical marijuana endorsed iv..:irijunna cooperatives, and marijuana club; (2) prohibiting any new licensed marijuana P:CduCtiern. 1 !:`mss 5sittg, at retail stores from, all ooncs, (3) prohibiting marijuana cooperatives frim all ..}rics, (4) prohibiting marijuana cltihs or lounges from all zoites, and (5) requiring any home -growing by tiir,iliFied patients as allowed by state law to be conducted only in single family residential roues in permanent structures that are opaque and not visible by ne:ghbers or From the public rights-of-way, and ti clarify that renters may be required, as Wray be authorized by Federal, state, and local kiwis, to give notice to landlords of their intcntittl, to grew marijuana plaints in a rental dwelling. l'I,nse note that the staff report from February 25, 2015, has been updated to (L) conform to the change. to the amendment project number (ter CTA 2016-0001), C2) update dates of publication of'the public hearing ural SEP& and (3) update the discussion of proposed rules by the Washington Liquor and Cannabis Planning Commission. is conducting a public hearing an the proposed amendments, after which it will deliberate and ultimulely vote on a recommendation to forward to Cit Council. Note tliat all information taken mJ received since the beginning of this process is incorporated into the Planning Comrt1ission'S consideration of these antcndmonts and is part of the record and basis for Planning Commission's recommendation. For informational purposes, all information provided as part of the prior meetings has been included with this RCPA. NOTICE: Notice kir the herring on the proposed ;tet 4:tr.117.o':aL Inti bc-c,i provided to lite Spokane raft Aims Herald in accordance with the ter] ii run tents of Title i + S APPROVAL CRITERIA: SVMC Section l?.K }.'1 :'!0(F) Fat-oviel+ ;3p1,r'it‘;:! fbi' text amendments to the SV1viC. The criterion stipulates tliat ilii: anic°tidrtwrit(3) mast il:.! v.ith the applicable provisions of the Crintpreiicnsil,•c Plnri b;.ar :a sobs tctt ii:il 1-21a60r1 1_ Lre l ul]lic Iic a.tlt, safety, welfare, and protection of the environmeril. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: The: ['Li -inning Gi'.ivi:wi: aakv:s no statement or Nv..1mmendation reg irdiind, the prop..]>;L(I-oraetidrirerttl. C3 IlCr Ell;lre C1'.:ta Mirr!I :lti"Lr,ni lllu w`li h 'it1 tet r+rtiOndttn nt requirements p,.,r s,e;ittr r;:. ,....•i(_ 17 2i) 1;Q{F'j. STAFF CONTACT: ..'In isti rri kusiscn — Planner Jenny Nickerson — Senivir Plans Examiner Lamb — Deputy City At.o .w y ATTACHMENTS: A. Staff ReporOnclidiirn copies of Ordil:etrlCi; Nk.is. 14-021 artd 15-017 B. Proposed amendments re, Lir:,t,l: . k. ;: 'rvi+:. '4'',1C. r� [2ii.O50, clink: ApE:Aldk A C. Copy of RPCA from C)ct: l::r .':', ::(31 D. Copy or RPCA from .;,_ e�lt•,:r - 'rl I nlc tits E. Copy of RPCA A `.`ir-rt IJLccuil:cr , "+'e ; .. r:ra.,tiri2 F. Copy of I I'Li f lie, l^:1nv;:i t G. Copy of RPCA &crni d'.ia t -1e 1 t?, 'L . i, ii /1:.t H. Copy of minutes iiront i.}..--robcr 22, 2015. 2015. December 10, 2015_ February 2.5, 2016, and March 10, 2016 meetings. 1. Police crime tracking information requested di Ue,, ,n:4! !1, 2015 meetiii J. Document regarding "medical" marijararta rule rrurri Le e'tirii'.:is r;.r .\:.I.: ori trurn \lard' 2016 meeting -i.l'I:1-tf]\1]) Minutes r; p. Fk:rnc 1r':rllc:e ISI:La[I11rlQy Commission (•4,1111Cil U ;tribers--City Hall, April 14, 2016 Chair Graham coiled r : t 6:00 p.m. Cottamigsionet•s, staff and andiettcc stood fcrr the pledge of Administrative Deanna Morton took roll and the t'r'llcgv'inL [numbers and staff were present: Kevin Anderson Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney U[altom Lori Barlow, Senior Planner Jaren:, Johnson Christina Janssen, Planner Tim 1;elIcy Jenny 1tir,el+erson, Senior Plans Exaarni,ner 'like Phillips Saitinne Eiisha I-1eath, Office Assistant SL.,• Deanna Horton. Secretary of the Commission ' it °,':' j r . u .' :°' ?'r : k:lr� 14. 2016 agenda as preSei ttd The Vole mr the ra'raticn %was r/1J -Sti ii PI lrr jcra'ui', ;cm irtitllfr5-J Lili4r flit r1 f.J�!tJ ti {1[r5_S LY{. ,Jr,frrrtir +. 017f:1V 1.fo f.rr1i ^:vis'Ire .49crr'ch 16, 2016 ►Biomes as they were presen?ted. The tole on the rt'2i t! Jpl Kr sJti K: '1' Lip' au in'. MO lire inalicni pass CUM flSSION REPORTS; The Commissioners had no reports. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Senior Plattner Gori Barlow reported there is n Dior sturty se 5 on schedule for May 3, 2016, between the City Connell and the Plannirp, Conimisginn to dismiss draft;pals and polices which could be inclladed in the City's Comprehensive Plan. PUBLIC COMMENT: There were no public comments. COWITVIIISSJON BUSINESS: Public Rearing: CTA -2015-0006 proposed amendments to Spokane Volley Mrenecitml Code (S' C) 19.57 Marijuana Uses, 19.120.950 Permitted Use Matrix nod Appendix A, Del -Indians After rcadin, the rules for a public ]1c:]ring Choir Graham opened the puhlrc hcurire at 6:08 p.m for CTA -20] 001167 proposed amendments lo Spokane Valley Municipal Code (S' MC) 19.55 Marijuana Uses, 19.1':0,058 ?emit:cd LJsa r+lc.lri`ti and AppcndixA,,, Definitions. Deputy Cit..,- Arlarnc r::-ik Land) ,t.r. the Commission ar1cl aud1 t'.c' ar pres4niition outlining the preccs.5 of rrn,tn.:li:Ig the eurrc:nt ra.ri . :iia regulations and the current moratoriums which are in place. Rwcrra[ti:In:11 7n1.;IrijL1tt111: i • le!!.:11 •:ast' 1'rl" 1.V.i )ington and uses arc licensed by the Washington sr3tc 1.ir rI,r and C;rnnal s , i3,, .rci t`,`' i ,-':i;r.:1i:rrrtLiana use is gvrernrrd by numerous lass and codes: 1'Lrl r°rl_ tir:r;t` aar:d City. i hw passaoc Ut ]- �.i [dill Il[.}[ a11411+'y5 how the State would regulate the medical n1arljuan:] 1't v of industr'y°. ▪ in 2015 the State Legislature passed biLLs to rec=oncile medical and recreation marijuana markets c, IVlaintairts the carne licensing system through the WSLCB co Adds `medical marijuana endorsement' for licensed retail stores o Eliminates collective gardens effective July 1, 20l6 o Establishes cnoperatives for up to four patients a Cities may reduce the slate bulfekrw io I DO feet except ar.ound schools and playground's o Establishes a t' ansportaii:'n o Establishes a research tical. : o Allows qualified patients to r i, 1:. ; tal;�n[s per housing unit c WSLCB must increase the r,ui,r`' r i .:ri c7:.1[ed retail locations to accommodate trr.%ciical marijuana needs rr. 1-gC!ir:}' Mules in Oct. of 2015 04-14-161'',UI nine CLion nissi(W1 inu €s Vas of • Proposed final rules should be complete by mid -2016 • Sets the number of'retails stores statewide at 556. Still three for Spokane Valley, but ]f the moratorium were lifted, would likely go to six. • No limit an. number of producers acid processors ■ Sets rut= for cooperatives, which must register with the WSLCB Mr. Lamb explained the Dept. of Health Pias been coxed with developing rules for `medical' marijuana. Since marijuana is still acontralled substance it cannot btested for !Led inal qualities. • Emergency rules in 2015 ▪ Proposed final rules should be co !up el, [lid 7,1.11 r>' • Designates `compliant' marijuana, rc;lst.e.1 • Mx exempt for qualified patients • ,.n) -Cotte over21, and certain minor r°I;I r [It 1'C t.;*k' -til r hillli 111 .!:ll l`. i�n'[l, ▪ Only qualified patients may purchase: a High THC compliant marijuana o Higher volumes of marijuana o Receive a tax exemption Mr. Lamb covered the current status of the marijuana nlorat 1 LUni5 in the City: • A moratorium on new medical marijuana uses, unlicensed marijuana uses, was established December 9, 2014 • A moratorium on new marijuana uses licensed by the licensed by the WSLCl3 was established October 6, 2015 • Both moratoriums require the City to develop approl:' ::1,c .:,-::'i r .]. f,.iii }k .�;• i17: effect to 2415 State legislative arrumdtrtents, • Prior to the moratoriums: • The City had established zoni 1 , (:' iC,trt`,11 •.71'i ]'4::-1;':1L1i'1lel. [":U11.1 which were adopted in July of • The adopted regulations applied producers, and • Marijuana production is permittcL. -.11 lt: I II1:,:r,,trial and tlic t, -llt lnllll;;c zones outright and is permitted in a litt,'It4cr mannLr in tlhc Regional Cornmcr•nia] and Community Commercial zones • Marijuana processing is permitted in the Heady Industrial and the LiJlii latcl1,rstrial zones outright and is permitted in a limited manner in the Regional CLrimII,:rc.ial and Community Commercial zones • The Inca t buffers for both production and processing are these facilities cannot he located within 1,000 feet of City Hall, CenterPlace, any vacant City property (other than stnrtnwater and public rights-of-way), vacant library property and vacant school property • Marijuana retails sales axe permitted in the Mixed Use Center, Corridor lrlixed Use, Regional Commercial and Community Commercial zones. • "file local buffers for retails sales are. these facilities cannot be located within 1,004 feet of City Hall, CenterP]ace, p .-perty (other than stortuwater and public rights-of=way), vacuo'. '.il r,:_ ;�ropilcy and vacant school property, the Appleway Trail and the Center -;-,1,11 Mr. Lamb explained the Planning Cuntr::is.,;..1.1A k7;,d been through an extensive process ro develop the proposed draft changes to the'i. i,, . v�:41r ]i17g the marijuana regulations. There had been moetings ori (noted by staff oiler n�L :i,r , E I r:r-nber 24), October 22, Novernl:c:r 12, December 10, 2015, February 25 and March ; I:: ell , .the Planning Commission took a held trip in which they: U414.16 Planning Cam Fru , %1inutvs Page, 3 of S • Did "vwindshiold tour" CI Ltirowu Op Farm located at 26 I N Woodruff, wwlhcre i1 wits trnec'i this is the highest-producing facilitp in dollar value in Washington but vert no nd2..;crr wt from the exterior Toured [ riftlxrar production/processing facility located at l.S1{It E Euclid Avenue. Manager Stan Fang rind property owner Paul I3ielec the opernticns Il+cxe~d at this facility • Visited Loc415 Carina Louse retail facility healed Lit 9610 I where stat" and Coni iTiissidr7ars spoke k shop owner Doug Pederson e1:;!t.r :ii : zt:eratinns Mr. L. rnb commented the Planning Commission has also receivdc,:l I•i :m rrdffi_ frog; the, pulblie:, irom the. police and fire departments. Based on previous discussions with the Planning Commission stabdrafied proposed amendments to the,: marijuana regulations which in short: • Do not allow for any view marijuana processors • Do not allow for anw irewti marijuana producers • Do not allow for any irew marijuana retail stores • Do not allow for any cooperatives Appendix A, the definitions ;rave been amended to be updated with the correct langlrngc t new definition for a marijuana club or lounge has been added and a line in the Farmirted Us•c. l'vlti,rix has been added showing it: is not allowed in any of the City's zones. The Permitted l_,se !dal ;t !ra^; 1 4n amended to show the line items on the matrix lrn.e been charmed from an `S' wrhich ref :., ro Supplemental regulations, to being struck out meaning that use is not allowed in any zore. iIcrme grows arc allowed in a]1 low density residential (ones, hut the residence must comply wii ;:11 lea a! building cedes, the grow must be indoors in a permanent structure„ no smell, no :ability to ;4i; it Eto,: outside. Language has been added regarding rental property and disclosure is required is ihe,e..:1)cr.r-: for it. Processing, is allowed at home, but no chemical processing is allowed in a reiieicrac . The SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance for t]tis amendment will be, issued April 1 5. _rC Mr. Lamb wanted to address the questions from the !gist greeting_ fhe first question was Lite; Lax_ excinption Applies to qualified patients. Mlariju na sales are charged a state exci t along with applicable state {ale. aind use tax. All of these taxes would be exempt to a qLL. I I iw:: piitit. Mr. Lamb clarified that -qualified patients' are onLy patients who had been lo i di .ch r" authorization card and rr ister with the sate s':stent. The next question was it :lir:re ;:1i$ regarding prohibiting the selling of rnarijusna to impaired purchasers* There is ! I, ) prohibits selling marijuana to a marijuana impuiri.d purchaser. Commissinner Anderson clarified only 15 plants are allowed per housing unit, but they are not allowed in a multi-family zone. CommisSiOT1er OrnhauT1 didn't remember eliminating cooperatives from the regulations. Mr. Larnb confirmed it being part oldie proposed ducted language based an Commission discussion and was in the draft regulations sent in the most recent packet. Commissioner Anderson asked Low the nonconforming, regulations would work il`the lease of one of the retail shops should not continue to work well for the owner. Mr. Lamb said based on the current noncantot ing regulations, a retail store would not be able to move from their current location, Tile provision for abandonment is I2-months, but tal that location, so it doesn't allow for the business to change locations. Only billboards are allowed to be able to change locations. Commissioner Anderson commented however we don't restrict the nun/bet of other businesses. Commissioner Stathos asked if another business of the stitne type could move into the same Io ration. Mr. Lamb responded if it was done within a 12-month period. Commissioner Allinson asked Witte license was in a joint name and the partnership dissolved, could one of the partners then tr eve the business. Mr. Lamb said the nonconforming regulations go with the use and arc not tied to an owner. CDmm:ssioner Stathos asked how a smell would be enforced. Mr. Larnb said it currently is difficult to enforce, and explained the process. Under the new provisions, enforcement would be easier. Current nuisance, ordinance sues a smell to a reasonable person. The proposed changes would make any smell a code enforcement issue. Commissioner Phillips asked hew the nonconform ir rules could be changed to allow the retail shops to move. Mr. Larrnh said the t04-1 d-16 tintrizs Pap 4 orb Planning Commission ccuid make that request, but he would need to c 1Tti'Lr •�a•iiI :-:r.:tt the change was substantial enough to require an additional pubii= 1,trini.! Chair Crrahtrn continued the Commissioners had no other qucstLor, iryr ,::.r i .:nd 111pi I l testimony, PaulBit<Iec, 911 S Valley View, Post Falls: Mr. Bielec I5 the Pres idl ei ,til 1 Li...ice.r, .,l i i c.; ......'trade owns the northwest cooter of Euclid and Laden, the place which rlie 1.1t:r : getting a blessing from the City for 1-502 production and processing in 201,1, rklr. It c;uc 4.e:dl ilii k.vas able to lease a good amotant of his property to a new lie ensees with the idea they would <,dd infrastructure in the future to obtain more tenants. Since then he and his tenants have added hundreds of thevsands of dollars for tenant improvements. Mr, Biielee said the Commissioners iorrers saw what was inside the building but there is more that is not seen. Due tr.; the moratoriums, he is no longer able to obtain any new tenants far his v+acartt space. He said this may seem .rivinl lo the Commission, however to him it is devastatiztg, He said they arc new restricted from leasing any additional space to any processors/growers, and more important we are not able to replace any of the tenants. F a tenant goes out of business, if they change business plans he cannot replace these tenants. In recent months he has turned away several potential tenants who wanted. to Icuse from hire, which could have resulted in 20- 100 jobs for the City. He asks the Commission ID please consider separating the grcwingiprxessora from the retail. He said Ile realized this had not been brought up before and he feels they are two different animals, 1-1e said he has attended many of the planning meetings and most ol'the ciscussion has been but retailers. Growers in the Spokane Valley sell their product either to existing retailers `n the City or to any other retailer across the state. The product will be gown regardless of the location through any licensed 1-502 grower any place in the state. Prohibiting additional growers ill the City does not accomplish anything other then moving; jabs out of the Spokane Valley to another tuning jurisdiction. Mr. Bieiee offered that licensed growers have a huge amount invested in their businesse.s. The product is tracked from seed to sale. The product is tested for quality, meld, fungus, bugs and hopefully soon pesticides. If meld, fungus or pesticides arc round it wi11 not pass testing and cannot be sold as is. It built out Facilities 5uch as his site, it is a controlled environment %%hick helps to eliminate the lit, :d, bugs and fungus. Many growers are ewcn $xarting to utilize organic methods of controlling the aur,$. He believes this will eertintre into the future ataa>,use oldie pesticides. He offered the Black Markel dues not care if they selL to minors. if they use pesticides, fungicides, they de not pay LAI, or payroll taxes for employees, They do not track their product from seed to sale, they do not test their product for mold, fungus or quality_ They do not pay sales or excise L x to educate the public He said this goes for flat: home grows as well, saying there are some home grows that don't know what they are doing. He reiterated his request to separate the grower/processor from the retaiiers when, snaking the recomlt ndation to the City Council. They are comp:etcly different with different Gcncerns. He said he could understated the: cancunes %vitt' additional retailers in the City. However growers ship product outside the area as well as selling is in the area. He asked what harm is there to support employees who work hard tc support t=heir Families in a legitimate business Mate City of Spokane Valley in a first class secure environment, Commissioner Stoy asked if there were limits on producers and processors. Mr. Lannb said there was a tom] cancpy limit statewide. There is a limit on how big each production rucility can be in terms cf now much canopy they arc allowed. There arc three different levels %with a matt of 30,000 square Feet of canopy. Th.e state max is 8,0O0,000 square feet of canopy space, he thought. There could come a time when they start to limit the production but the state is nowhere near that at this time. Commissioner Anderson asked if Mr. Bielee's current tenants could expand under the moratorium, if their License allowed more canopy space. There was discussion with Mr. Bielec regarding his un ented space, how he can only expand the tenants lye already has if tleey have a license which a1tows for more canopy space, how the moratorium is for the grower;/processors as well, he is a property owner not a license holder_ Having leo one else who wished to testy5i Choir Graber closed the, public hearing at 6:51 „p.m. Commissioner Graham confirmed the taxes are oriy collected at the paint of sale. Mr. Larnb reminded the Commission because the producing and processing .'arc wwholesa.Ie b}uyinesses, nes taxwes are gained from the producers/processors, Commissioner Graham confirmed there would be income collected on .,11-16 I':itnnine Cnmlrtissiun Minutes Pap s of b1 the larnperry used by the growers/processors bul secondary income would be frons the employees working in the facilities. COM rtais5ionnr discussed some information he shared with tic Commission. I1c said page 1 of his Imliclout states that in 2009 tate American Medical .r' wsociation (AMA) requested that cannabis be removed from the Schedule I; controlled substances, ill carder for it to he studied properly. Without this requested being honored, which it hasn't, there will be no studies and therefore no support. So eery time someone says there is no AMA suport, it is because they can't study it. Without it being removed from the list of Schedule i drugs, tl.c AVIA won't study it. He said while A`,IA as a body doesn't support medical cannabis as a valid treatment, numerous independent surveys are indicating medical professionals around the Mabe are corning out in support_ ivcn the Food and Drug Administration is wanting to `get going' on the approval o'fcannabis. Colnsnissiura i .It 1insort .said that another misconception of cannabis k that it is a gateway drug. He quoted from the oldest report he could find h his research, which was from 1999. but other reports he round were similar. He said that the report said that while roost people Aire use harder drugs usually used cannabis First, there isnnthing which links cannabis to moving on le stronger drugs_ It is more ofa middle step, in a progression which cornrnonty starts with tobacco, then alcohol, then cannabis and then whatever the harder drugs are that someone would experiment with. Cannabis when not available, is more often replaced with. prescription drugs found in an adolescent's hone. Commissioner .iohn.son said so cannabis being labeled a gateway drug is often inaccurate, 1-te said another argument everyone has heard is that legalizing cannabis sends the wrong message to youth. He said pace 3 ofhis irirndont shows an excerpt from a study which says that legalizing cannabis does not increase use in adalesceatts. He said his impression 1.114g that the age group we are talking about does not to adults. They listen to their peers. They don't care what message the City Council might be sending, or any government body for that matter. He said anyone who has pare Fled a teeito erundersrands that commonly a par11L's message is considered an anti -message by the teerttr er. 'I`hcre. was a study that showed in states which legalized cannabis use by adolescents, that it was higher before and after passage. There are other factors at play and those factors need to be discovered and addressed and blasting, cannahis is actually zt :el herring, Mr. Johnson discussed the tax revenues which would be rained by t:te City from the sale cannabis. Ile offered the $75,000, which had been mentioned in a previous meeting, did not seen. iike a lot. however there are news reports about the growth of the industry. Mr_ lohnson said he fell that last year's $75,000 would be $1 50,0Drt next year, and S30G,000 the next. I -]c said you can look r_t Ulu graph which boas on the VV'SLl~A's website and sec It has increased 7D% in 10 months, most likely to double in a year. By the time late slate fiscal year ends it have doubled. Also on the WSLC.13 website there was research on how the legal sales are impending on the illegal sales. Fie last referenced an artick from Time magazine, from April 2015, which states there has been a 2.5% drop 0f caru1bis confiscated by CIS Border Patrols and a 32% drop by Mexican aauthoritie€, relating chis to the legalization in sortie. US states. Commissioner Johnson said he did not think rhe Commissioners would drop the moratorium on retail, but he hoped the other Commissioners would consider drooping it for the producers and processors. He said the City is leaking at the loss or lobs, ~'(ages, and millions of dollars a year. He said there is one property owner who is here, and another property owner, which the Commission drove by that business, which had 200 ad time jobs, which is a lot of wages. he said he hoped the Commission would take a serious look at the proposed arnendment as it was written. Coiiimissioner Anderson stated he never considered the moratorium on the proclucersiprocessors since most of the conversations had centered on the retail_ hie said the best outcome wvnuld probably bp produce it here and sell it someplace else and he would consider that over selling to locals. Commissioner Anderson said the prcducingJpracessiag was nota problem iii Iris mind over the three retail outlets. He said he did not remember having a conversation about how rimy acres should be allowed, he thought it was State controlled. I -le would allow the productionprccessing. Commissioner Kelley- said the discussion is about how fast the City moves forward. Commissioner Kelley said there area lot of businesses in die State of Washington we'reich have trouble with regulations. He said there are u tat of associations which spend a lot of time fighting ni capital bill to get rid of regulations, welcome to the small business world in the State of Washington. He continued suyi:i4 there are associations like :he Elomc Builders Association, the Association or General Contractors, the Associated Builders and Contractees Association that are getting regulated every day. Every one :1 O4-I4-16 PlanningCarnmission Minutes Pegs 6 orb them ]las invested a great deal of money, maybe net the trillions yeti have, nue a great deal of money to them. They are getting regulated out of business and they are moving out of state all the tune. This is a cletitenge, this is something that needs to be addressed, hut he did not see where the marijuana industry should get special privilege just because they are a drug operation. Join the other associations that trrc. fighting the regulations. Find people who are on your side, that have common causes 7 rel get involved in them turd stop asking for the king to anoint your industry. Ccmii issio:ter Phillips said he felt that the nonconforming regulations should be changed to allow the retailers to mood l-lc said he did not Iikc placing anyone at the mercy of a landlord, He said the landlord should trot leave the right to trod over the lease the fact they can't move and they would be able to raise the rent. He feels, we should craft the regulations to ai:luw for the movement of the three retail shops. Commissioner Phillips said he was not opposed to allowing more prodeetioniperreeseurs, Commissioner Graham said she felt that some °Fere iuformatie}n was from a time when marijuana still held u stigma and that the gateway aegureent tori because it wasn't as readily available as it currently is, Commissioner Graham said she thought ahem the producers+'pracessors, where they are located and whar little impact they had on the surrounding areas. F r thoughts are rncrrc iii lime with lifting the nloratorienr On die pioducersiprocessors, She thinks it zooid bring as many jobs as Commissioner ,ir.I ii on I'iopcs, which is always geed. She has some conmerns abnur the Department of l iealih and how they are going to entbrce pesticides. She also agrees with allowing the current licensed retailers to move under nonconforming rules. Cornmissiaaers Stoy agreed that the mailers should be allowed tee nttrve. He also agreed with allowing the moratorium producers and processors to be hied. Commissioner Stathos said in all the discussions she. slid not realize the moratorium was affecting the producer'processors. Sile eornmertted on the visit, said the site was secure, there was no smell on the outside, it was clean andjobs are being created. She spoke to Commissioner Kelley's statements about fighting to create less regulations and she said we arc creating another layer of it because of our moratorium. She said Hs options now are so narrow there is no room for growth, even for someone who has already created a facility. She said she felt that the regulations needed to he reviewed_ Commissioner Kelley said he agreed a retailer should be allowed to move and not be bound to a location if they could not work cut a geed lease with a property owner. He else felt the- City should not allow for more than the three which lead already been established, Commissioner Kelley said regarding the production Facilities, he said he Felt the City should move cautiously. There was no data on what would happen to the employees working in the facilities now, there. is no data un, what kinds of eliallenires the Industry would face, he is more its favor of putting the brakes on a Attie bit, lettieg people op.rate as they are, but he is not in favor oF opening the flood gates. Chair Graham stated she felt the Commission had :r ticnseilsus on the following items: ■ Lifling the moratorium on the prochuc rr't,rcaeGs.: errs • Drell: regulations which evould allow 11 Lsrre~ rllrti.rtt[', slirps to change locations Commissioner volley requested an informal vote on the two items. c}ml°YI;;sin .e: Stc,v asked ifthere was consensus to limit the numbers of produccr..processors in order to aline. C:;] n r: i til .nor KeIIe to be more condonable. Mr. Lamb responded the Stare controls hew those lice-i es kr:. chis+ °,I ii_i. d and they are not given out based on a rtuniher of outlets, but on amount of cancioy sl ac... 1.'L} ,inlissio ler Anderson discussed how the State is controlling the canopy space and it is a sink... ice rauit:lhrr. a lel t1wi5 could be a floodgate in Spokane Valley, however this is occurring all Quer the state. Ile f :i the restrictions and eliallcngesto starting this type of business would not allow torr just anyone to I-c :ii]lc to do it. Com:nissir3rter Kelley comteented that just because cvcrw one else in the State is dai.t'!. it ridiculous. In response to Commissioner Ser iIi s' comment about the requirements For licensing a producer/processor, Mr, t,an b explained the State requires they knee a property in mind, Iic.wcwer he was unsure to the extent they must demonstrate they have: u lease; tion the npplicurit must have an opt:reline plan for that location, whit.h mitst include ull the rtecessory security features, the cruor iitine 04-14-16 Nanning Cammirsinv helin ACE. ['ageoFS area, Gamirras, how many employees, Until the applicant has a site pinned dom n, which includes zoning at the Iectal level, any teuari i trlpravemerit s which might be necessary! they must cpntbrrn to all building code requirements. All of tllis must occur before taey arc allowed to have a WSLCB license. Sr, [Mans Examit:cr Jeutty Nickerson discussed site had been working with some applicants for possibly a year and a half or uirwc As they work turuugh identifyirtg u !gcntioir, securing a least:*, identifying sr+ttnt type of modifications would be necessary, applying fat the permits, eomplhiiig with the 'permits, Following the inspection process, applying fora husine.ss license and moving forward with W"SLCB. She said some applicants have nc problems with the process when they find property which is zoned properly. the building doesn't need many inodifications to meet Etre?safely requirements. The City will mi approve a business license without [herr, having applied for airuilding permit completed, The 1' ;[.C'I would look to make sure that the building and tire codes have been mut before issuing a prac"sIL license. She noted she has had applicants who have done work, invested money only to learn they v.ill not be aprirowrcd. The Commissioners hod a cullsensus irate co modify th propasad draft; language to allow. • Marijuana Production — Perrrritted in heavy and light industrial zones outright (indoor and outdoor); permitted in limited manner (indoor growing only) in Regional Commercial and Community Commercial zones. ■ Marijuana Processing Perrnirted in heavy and light industrial zones uu.Gright 'packaging and extraction); permitted in limited manner {pack...:`in1., a,rtl 1:)"oclitt� t i. useable marijuana only) in Regional Commercial and t.. .!'11tu::it4 C rn1:lcr::i: I .renes. Local rafters f'nr both rnariauant p:'r iu-l7c"r1 pi::,c.,, :n - C1 r.nnor be located within l.nr..0 1._.r:. i t';", p i.tI I,, Centc-place. vacant City propery (otlher [1131] : L in iwater and public piTTL tyr and vacant st:hciuL propel':y. Cor11111iSSicwr Kelley Rota[ once this was dime. tilers 0...ould be no limit on the number of production facilities which could open in the City, 176re oor (hi .ti' propcsaf. wrrs SOX in favor, one against. Commissioner r Kelltra r}is.h'eiitiirg. The Commissioners hits u conwnsus Grote ILO Modify the sar'oposee drank language to • Allow only the three; retail marijuana stores, but to modify the nonconforming rules to allow the three stares to change locations as long as they Maintain all the previous requirements. ▪ Permitted in the Mixed Use Canter. Con -id it Mixed Use, Regional Cammercaal, and Con? mu nity Cont trier[ ial :wanes. F Local huffers fcir retail sales: Cannot be located within 1,000 feet of City Hill, Centel -Place, vacant City property (other than storrnwater and public rights -cif -way), vacant library property, vacant school property, the Appleway Trail, and the Centennial Trail. Commissioner Kelley asked if the language could be crafted to only allow the shores w move, if they were experiencing lease negotiation issues. There was discussion about how the City would not be able to acco r.plisli this. Commissioner Johnson wanted it noted his vote on this would reflect his desire to not restrict lite retail stores to only three in the City. The vote on this proptlscl wars sLrr lar aw '. one ❑ Tea znst, with COnarttassr nner Johrasour dissenting. Mr. Lamb noted staff would draft up a now proposal and notice a new public hearing. This would not be happening at the next meeting based on,. statutory requirements. c4-1,4-16 Pianryitis Cornanissien minutes Poge s of 8 GOOD OF THE ORDER: Ms. Barlow explained how the new gads and polices for the newtupdated Comprehensive Plan had been developed and there was a possibility that there would not be a direct comparison to the old Comprehensive Plan. ADJOURNMENT: There being no other business the meeting was adjourned at 7:02 p.m. Chair Heather Graham .$acre ry Deanna Harton Dat s ed (_f1\ 0U. POK.1':I.. VA. L1;\ Request for Planning Commission Action Meeting !sate: May 12, 2016 Item: Cheek all that apply: [i m . isent E] or, Ej ;Dublin 11earing r 2.r:•di1t6 legislatiOn FiLE NUMBER: CTA-2016-c10O I GEND:\. ["CFAITITLE: Public I Ica 1.1:7i1.:;i11;. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: City ^ �initiated /ycode text arno.ralniciii to the Spokane - Valle} it]un ip tl ':��i r � Ir1C) cI 'L:ler 19.85, SVMC 19.120.050, and 'ti.pp,iiid;x to adt1 4LILLLIIL&iii izgarlr'::1!! Is".iA::':':!Ir<I ':LSCS, Ali. new marijuana retail Lyses, cooper...i '. i .:Ind Clubs from any zones Ikithii' °`•:' i Il',', I: :'1 .0.......txtsting retail us' to locate within existing :irl:i subject to existing bufferiiu2: Ill 1)4 Ide af:l1.1".1 71131 regulations for production and lrrc.lccss.ine of home-grown ui,i:ijuanar by enol:I ... l 1.°Ilit..s::<;:nd ri1 igit;-!°uCi providers for personal use in residential zones, GOVERNf°G LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A.106: ftCW 69,50 (LoLJi]ii:l II61:dti't.4 *;':'I; Rif* 69.5IA; SVMC 17.80.150 and 19.30,010; SVMC 1935;.SVMC 19.120.0311 PREVIOUS ACI ION TAKEN: City Council has adopted regulations' as st;t 1."::d1 in SVMC 19.120.05° and SVMC 19.E5 for the zoning and buffering of recreational marijuana. CLx December . 2CI'i:I. City Council adopted a moratorium ort unlicensed marijuana uses (primarily medical niariii.<Luti). On 'October 6, 2015, City Council adopted a moratorium! 1.711 marijuana uses liccn5cd by tlri Liquor and Cannabis Board ("WSLCB"). On April 14, 2016, Planning CommissioL 11 iL1 a pu'alic 1.eLirir,6 and approved a modified proposal fog• consideration. BACI<GROUNT: The City is in the process of developing ectraprehensive focal niarijuana re4LL;aticus. as required tlursttaut to moratoriums as described in the Staff Report, rile Planning C:L,mrrlissi.I1 conducted background study sessions on October 22, 20:5, November 12, 2015, and December 10: 7.1 tl At those study sessions, Planning Cc iomissiLan reocived information from staff regarding recent tihanucs to State law, ongoing ruiernokittg by the W"ask,9ngtort Liquor and Cannabis Board CO.'SL(._:13) ;mit Washington Department of ] ii alth, testimony from the public., information from Spokane Valle; I i iiu and Spokane Valley lire, and a range of .urious types or:availablle options. Planning, Cc.nirnisior: also visited a marijuana production/processing operation) and retail store on March 3, 2016, Planning Commission considered various options and ultimately gave a consensus for it:!,':1 to draft proposed amcndLzlent language that would ban all new marijuana uses, allow home le notice by renters to landlords for home; growing, and ban home Ii1L: recommendation from Planning CoLn:nission, staff drafted proposed amendments, whit:I: ',•, _r 2.11 briefly at the meeting on February 75, ?f}1 6 and again duringa study session on March 10, 20 i u. On April 14, 2016, Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amertiii7LAiiiti, t•.hi;:l, generally would prohibit any new marijuana uses. One interested party spoke during the pub'.ic 11L -sing. As part of deliberations following the public hearing, :Tangling Commission approved a subsi.zr.tialiy modified proposal as described below. Pursuant to SVIWIC 17.80.150(K.), the Planning Cormnission is required to conduct a public hearing an the modified propesil if the ria odific.ation is snbsianti:rl. Accordingly, the Planning Commission is holding a public hearing on the modified proposal on Mdy° l2. 2016. The modified draft amendment. proposal will amend chapter 19.85 SVMC, SVMC and Appendix A by (1) adding definitions for (medical marijuana endorsed retail stores, marijuana cooperatives, and marijuana clubs, (2) prohibiting any new licensed marijuana retail stores from all zones, (3) allowing existing licensed marijuana Mail stores to locate within the existing designated cones in conzpliiance with existing buffering requirements. (4) prohibiting marijuana cooperatives from all %OaiC,, (5) prohibiting marijuana clubs or lounges from all z;orllf;s, (6) requiring any home -,growing by qualified patients as allowed by state law to be colid;IL`•,'d only in single family residential zones in. permanent structures that arc opaque acid not visible by nci_libura or front the public rights-of-way, and to clarify that renters may be require -d, as may be antlinrir d by federal, state, and local Taws, to give notice to landlords or their intention to grow Imrijil r: t plants in a rental dwelling. The major changes to the original proposal were to I l) altow licensed marijuana production and processing in existing zones in .:olnp:lance with existing buftcring requirements, and (2) allow existing licensed. marijuana retail stares to lot we within existing allanwabl2 zones in compliance with existing buffering requirements. Please note that the staff report has been updated to conform to the modilied proposal. I?laratni i Commission is conducting a public hearing wi the proposed modified amendments, one. Aida it deAcrate and ultiniaiely vote on a r'ecomm:ndarion to forward to City Council. Note that: all infaorm:Akiri I;rkcn find received since the beginning of this process is incl -(rusted into Planning Commission'; cor, ideration of these amendments and is part cf tlic reLcrd ;Irr,_! 6:1 I'1;irlr; rr Corniiiission'> recommendation, FC: I' I'1iirnla`II14111'.Il l;llrposes, all infarniaficri prcrvieeiI ;I p;':rr et the prior 11r4CtL: l;r",:. Imar. If`: .ijdcd with (111 RC'PA. (t't'IC'E: lit t= : (.;r the public hC:ting c} t rltir prc}l!I;sL arn�rliF I.!I1i 'I:rS h �tl )rtivitlLLl h::'tu .5;•rnd:ar+cr `: i l , cordancc with the' rC'.gLllrc:]i eats IJC ILI0 17 S\'i IC. APPROVAL i.. C'RI"T f'-R.fA: SVMC Section 17,80 15O(r) pr:wid1 , : lv..v:al crilcria for tet am en:lincr,ts tc7 the SVMC. ,:riterion stipulates that. the PTrai)trscci :tirendirem(s) rnt.`;t I:rc: cransist;:lat -.villa t':1 applicable prov'isionti of the Comprehensive flail L.ari br:rr <, uh l_lr li;tl rel€;ti;'i I[; r1r falllrli. hculll., 5u1'ety, aw•e.Jiare, pry+.cation ofihc environment. RECOMMENDED ACTION ORMOTION: "I hi f}f.ln_r nl l?ivisicrn RI;IIke no st:tlencrit tr;` rccon;nicndxtion regardin!4 flaw proposed amendment.; oth.;r IIi;iLe propo!.:,111 c,.irtrplies City ie' ;Illtenilment requirements pursuant to SV1v1(' 'wvl:ashinpion Siat.c L w. STAFF CONTACT: Christina Janssen — Plattner Jenny Nickerson—Senior ?lens Examiner Err,( Lamb — (Deputy. City Attorney ATTACHMENTS: A. Updated Staff Report on modified I,..� I+, h.11 :: c Iu+lIII t .: iw ; i C rr, in;ince Nos. 1.4-021 and 15- 017 3. Proposed modified amendments to chapter i{F ',t la Appendix A C. Cstpy of RPL'A from October 22, 2015 Ccpy of RFC from November 12. 2015 meet E. Copy of RPCA floor Deeernher 10, 2015 nrcrlinfr F. Cepa of RPCA i`rom l cbruat'y 25, 2016 mcetintx G. Copy of lt.p'C, from March 10. 2016 met n Fi. Copy of RPCA rrom April 14, 20 id meeting L. Cope of minutes from October 22, 2015, Notienbcr 12, ?0'i 5, December 10, 2015. February 25, 2016, Mardi le, 2016, meetings and April L4.20 G public item inn and meeting, J. Police crime tracking information requested at December 10, 2(I 5 meeting K. Document regarding "medical" marijuana rule from Commissioner Anderson from Merck 10, 2016 meeting Chair Graham called pledge of allegiance_ staff were present: Kevin Anderson Heather Graham James Johnson Tim Kelley Mike Phillips Suzanne Stntho; Joe Stay APPROVED ilelinutes Spuknuc Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers— City halls May 12, 21116 the meeting to order at 6:02 pen. Commissioners, staff ;arid audierce stood For the Administrative Assistant iJeanna Horton took roll and rhe fallowing mensltus tsnd Erik De.rwry City Aticrnty ',11 t Janssen. Planner Leel r.r.:: 1-lerton, Secretary of the Commission Commissioner Siry moved to accept s)te ,l f ry 12, 2016 agwi'da aq presented. The vote was seven ; r: frtlro,r, zero against and rhe motion passe el. Cnrurrris,5/Air r &toy PI OVVar approvc the Apr it28, 2OJ6reinuiesas• presented. The vote Wenseven r"xrfavor, aero againstanddle= reeliun passed. C'rrratrotjnion r• Stay mover! to approve the May _T, 20,16 minutes as they were presented. Commissioner Graham She wanted to clarify something which was said tai the May 3, 2C lb joint meeting. She read a prepared statentertt saying she took exception to s:utcrnent made by the Community and Economic Development. Director John Rahman at the May I'd hint CourirFiIiCoinmissian meeting- She said during the opening, of the meeting Mr• Flolirnan made a conenent that tlic Plarming Curnanission had somehow diverted its attention away fmrn the Comprehensive Flan. to Focus en tate marijuana issue. She said she would like to remind City staff the Comr7iwsinners work at the behest of the staff, us they sat the Commission's agenda. Interruption in the Comprehensive Plan was not because the Commission Wtws so focused on the marijuana issues nor was it because they Lensed to ignore the Comprehensive Plan, as a matter df Fact we spent many meetings address ire: Sevr2r r1. of the items on the Comprehensive f 1adt. until st fell off the Commission agenda in June (2O 5). She said thea were several meetiti!ge canceled ie the summer and the fall, xyhen the Commission resurnatf in 2016, i5 when the marijuana issues Came forward and the Commissions heard nothing more about the Comprehensive Plan until thejairtt meeting. She stated she cannot speak for all the Cornnlissioners linweve- 'hr ch.tirnran .7f this Commiseen, sane felt as ifthe integrity of their work had been questioned. She see' ,h. ;cti i ,,,,; ri+.rst importent re brute this forward and ask for an a .pole froth City sulfa.Carttnti., :: �}. i<. ii t. .-;Grid he did net ger that Feel from the statement. He said he felt it was more as if Mr. 11:)l1rr,.r._ 4415 ,inssi1y4' explaining the Commission has had other work as well, such as this marijuana subject, which 11, 1., ':sten consirlerrhlii 'tirnc. The other Commissioners said they steed by Commissioner Ji a!ett,m' r:,•i; 9i„ �Et The vote n„ rhe runtish wos seven in laver zero against, incl the urotion passed COMMISSION ISSION REPORTS: The Co mrxaissioners't::si no r,:port. A.DMLNISTRJ.TIVE REPORT: There wa_s no :tdtto:rikirari'.,c tepee:, PUBLIC COMMENT: "There were no public comments. COM MTSSION BUSINESS: A. Public Hearing -- CTA -2016-01I111 proposed amendment to Spokane "Valley Municipal Cnde (SVMC) 19..5 Moria ea ea Uses, 19.120.060 Pea'rriitted Use Matrix and Appendix A Definitions Commissioner Graham opened the pub lie hearing at 5;4 p.m_ Deputy City Attorney Erk 1arub gave an overview of the revised proposed amendments to the SVMC regarding the marijuana regulatiors. PPrevieesly a public hearing had been conducted on April 14, 2016, Al that hearing the Commission was contemplating a complete ban or; arty new retail marijuana stores, tiny new marijuana prodii ers or processors. After the public hearing the 05-12.16 I1:! n rsi ¢ I6 Cori r! tis i o n Minutes Page 2 or 5 rn i e an informal decision to modify the proposal for consideration. Staff determined die modifications were substantial encu;h to warrant another public hearing. The pec:nosed modified amendments are: • A definition for a marijuana club or lounge has been added • A definition fora marijuana cooperative has been added • The name of the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board has hewn '.1.I+c'.1tcd ilj Ti definitions • A definition for marijuana sales with P. medic it endnrerncnt has been ritldc.c • The definition for marijuana sales Eii 1.- the medical ':-ndorscpi `nt • Mearijuann production has Lieun reLLIrncd 1'7 1" zrnilt ti:.ii wilt ',I1,il' erroenia1 CI: is i�li 14�r1 •-1:T: ..I; in the Permitted i.J..e MatriM • Marijuana processing has been rL°?r r : ci a,' I::rmitted 9, 41- iipp.einentai conditions-.t:uus in the P+:rmitted Use Matrix • The regulations for 19,85.010, hvfarijuana production has be added back, with updates to the language regarding. City Hail • The regulations firer [0.85.0 20, r\-LLriJal.r,l., I ;;4 added back, with updates to the laug a.ee regardin City Hall. • Thr; re,gnlatinns for 19 5.630 Marijuana reiai: s.,i] ; h, °; :e :r rttinditi:rt re ::trate in ri:w marijuana. retail sr:]CS4:no(1 allOW til le L.! E1 I• 11:t•v:: iii lain the City afi lcngaw they can dill conform witli rl,e. I'• i2ti it+els :)°;ice • 19.85.040 are rile rc!e) .ro!.ioi' I.E. r,1,:rkItlrina uses ��'Irl� ! sr: I;rr.IIii:iic,i .r!�11.xIi i , cli�lxs, 1ourigi ari[I L _ F[tE I lti' '• . ,I_;I .It,L:;. [li'r :apply Lo I1 Ciril I lr :: • I9.$5.050 IIL 11'x' t'1 Ill:::1: ,y;1:r--'arl]u: ria Eiicti is Irt n _r.'1,; I(,I. qr. 1 11.: I I,..ril., ES: {:CITE'. ]: ss.CI[-.Cr (r311C''!1- 1! IL: Ii R1'i11" n resicii:l Iieiig 1.;nn4r 14i'I]ec1 t.le SI:_iL- had ti:: :t4t`I ;7'.11 .CI }- '..Ir'1 .` [7l.! I'=1:i 3'r'L[' ITt adc;r;l'.1r1 to adtlraNs L ii1 cluE s a roti itt'. ii r _7t 0111Y lIk' City's buil also -1.11,Z h ;il4.2 .; r.7 well, C:urk,rrri..poner Graham c!l1Scc? the public blic hearirl} at 6:23 p.m.. Commissioner Stay moved r, approve CTA-2P16-6OO1 as presented. Commissioner Johnson said he le conlirruing with the moratorium on any new mai[ business is not going to have the :rnpnct the Cuituiiik',uiri is hoping for. He feels more retail establishments will open immediately outside the City's borders with than revenue going to another jurisdiction. In the end will be just as much canruibi: inside the City as if we elbowed the mark t factors to control the business. He did sppreci:rte tlltd support the Commission's evolution on production and process and Said the supports Conunis: neer Phillips amendment from the last meeting to allow the current retail outlets tc move should they need to, but he would be voting against the arnclidtnent feeling it needed to allow more than the three current retail dreams. Commissioner Kelley- said he also would he voting against the amendment, saying not enough is known about how this would work. I -le feels the current amount of -producers, processors and retailers are sufficient. I -le would rather have the City wait five year and see how things have turned cut before allowing any more marijuana businesses. He would not be supporting the amendment for this reasons. The other Commissioners had no comments. Chair Graham called for the question. The gore on the remotion Was five iii favor, two against, with Commissioners Johnson and Kelley B. Study Session: Coiuprehensive Plan — £cor,oniic• l>crtielopnnent Retail Improvement Report Economic Development Specialist Chaz Bates l,r w€ :L I;r:scnt itinn on a recently completed economic development study, this one regarding rc.tr r il:'I ,1 :1 I;ilrr;. '.'.Rich will be incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan. The inforrnatio in .:.c ;ll -. i; 1r:3:[.:015. This will be used 10 [ruck retail growth in the City, this will also provide. steam _i., :,w.I ria; it' tltc 1_'ity to be able to use in the future. Staff conducted an inventory with the consultr,rel;, vt 'ke rut: ,tt retail in the City and the consultants :15••12• 16 ['limning Crtnintih.wi a Page 3 cf5 were surprised 41 haw tunny big liQX SUDIVZ the Ciiy already had, This helped them to identify the key retail anchors, define the retail trade areas, demographics and tho retail demand. This report will be used at a tool to assist in attracting bus:ncsscs and facilitate growth in the City's retail lbctpriiii. This report assisted in identifying the primary (rude area, which is a five minute drive front a major retail iccntion. This primary trade area is generally the City's boundaries. The secondary trade area is generally a 10 minute drive from a major retail location, which reached out beyond the City's herders. The demographics of the trade arca for the City had a wide range of irtctiines. Mr. Bates dater that relatively speaking the City has a more households earning between $30,000 and $75,000 than the City of Spokane. There werie higher pockets of Moraine north and south of the City but these people were driving through the City to shop The City has almost 36% of our households spending. more than 30°%a of their income on housing costs, which reduces the amount of income for discretionary purchases. ConamissionerJohnson asked about the demographics of these statistic. Mr. Bates said he die not have that information with hire this evening, however this inforniatiurt was corning frlonti the 2015 American Community ttunity Survey data. The greatest number or retail establishments are Pond ;er ices and drinking at 19%, small to mid-size retailers at 131% and motor vehicle/part dealers at 12%. Big box 5lares only account for 2% of the market, hut have a large influence on the retail sales. While the food services account for 19% or the market, they are limited service, not sit down restaurants. The largest spending category was motor ',Aide sales and part; which is followed by general sales which is the big hex story,. This is 66% of I the retaiI sales in the City. The City c rpttucs marc than 100%01 the rpeadine p w.er 1st rtt.)st retails L terroties iii tl:t• prinic.ry ritde area, The categories where the city captures 1c.ti;; thar 10IM art: sLcL,;0Inn1.;1.1atinn:,, fr)Chd and beverage ;e stores, performing arts, anti spectator sports. Pias Ictiv themes which carpe frarrt this study are ▪ Regiora1 iiraw I Ft' sl, peers throughout the rri ion Few nem:lyorhood retailers • Retail is diidw red by bitr bore 13i2 box st3re3 represent significant perti:;ni ul-sit!Qs • Spokane Valley Mall is a major retail draw • Few full-service restaurants • Higher incomes outside City to the north and south • Ara of retail are underperforming ar underutilized SN: r*rail improvement goals came from the report, along with passible supportive actions: • Leverage reoinnal rail k cal assets tr, drive local _ar�rtmerec o Identify potential projects that could spur tourism and prioritize city investments o Consider implementation of u 'might out' program o Ccrllsider implementation of a 'Taste of Spokane Valley' or ' i. staurant week' event • Support and expand existing retail centers o Offer financial incentives For voluntary physical irnpro,-riiirri. o ivl.atch businesses to available space o 1ritvnsity recruitment efforts o Provide flexibility for allowed uses and development types • Support catrr1vtia. transformative. or innovative retail prctjccts o Encourage high duality° retail and supportive uses at Mirabcau Paint o Participate in suhnrea planning process for the City Hall naso o Market analysis for a Farmer's market • Craft policy to support goad retail in the right places o Rezone commercial corridors c Expand andlor create neighborhood commercial overlay zone o Permit 'local production' uses • Plan 1d arid intiatstructure to support retail development o Identify capital improvements to existing retail centers o Invest in .1ppcarance or key gateways in Spokane Valley O5-12-Ici iaarlfling Omni -miss idrr Min Lik [ i nr' a USS Applevav i'r-n] 1: ;Tr.!' nearhy rets:] developnicn: pan r.carby parcels, ■ Strenntlien Spokane ValieN's Minix its rjta:btiernir.,tli::t O Promote retail sewrrients o Promote SptrkancValley's prioritic' r.: i irlErr":ctirl!i In r T niarketingefforts o nub licirc retailers and events Mr. Bates stated the next steps are to integrate this i;a:o i irricirl Alto [he x_ c march unsivn t'Ir:iii ni ;1111L`I1:i the development regulations to support these suggestion. Explore ret:til connections to the Appl'cvrdv Trail. Develop marketing materials which support our retail trade, coordinate with out rceion.tl partners, develop a list orfretail vacancies, and coordinate with developers to fulfill eottGmit; pr.Uriiiew. Commissioner Anderson vsked for clarifi:ation ors r part of the report which said `critical moss business versus limited rnix,' which is in lrjbit 4. Mr. Bates said there is usually a tipping noint'A'l'.er it comes to retail. Commissioner Anderson ri asked of thea was a list of the things tlte' City ��tr Irllssla'r in its retail, naming specific stares. Mr. Bates stated this ‘vas not this consuitann,i" tai':ti Information that specifics would cute from a retail recruiter, Commissioner Anderson said one of the sporting events missing from the list was a vol;cyi iiII tournament ever year, which usually is 12,040 rooms per year. Commissioner Stay commented on a large soccer tournament which also happens every year at Plante's Ferry Park. Commissioner Johnson 4vcndered how the Planning Commission would be able to impact these goals. Mr, bates and Ms. Janssen explained the information would assist in °reining policy in the Comprehensive Plan which would guide the staff in tlx: work they do. Commissioner Johnson also said he felt there should be more social media interface in order to reach out to the younger people in the community. The subject of a mixed rise development in the City of Sim-lkane lead herr, 1r critroped .md Commissioner Anderson has shared he did not feel the City shiul. brt -I1.111L2 iIE IIS I .:Ir 711 l -.I:, i'1Liw... w'. Con]I1lL. ic, J .ihiltitil:l :ti:al l ht felt a development or this type would l,t alit• ii i ,,.1; ',1C.C.11.i -L worked into I!1 plait. Cnr-Linis41[''1U1' Si Loin: said the joint tweeting hod tionllict Ir.n points in it. For cx; hill '.hl rti '�"inti gLICtitiOri. r t \'::stir C0i1 CrVati0n but In also then l' a1uIIrICrilrain nl tIiL C::3 ,1'1!11 Lrvos :111[1 lkhieh, require watering.. She said the exercise V"1.s 'P1 111E.. 1 i..t 1: seemed Lo,.', sit. Certain tl'rll'4'? Irl certain areas but not the same in all areal. Mr. Rates ;tang! Mr. Basinger would be returning to the Conurtission to share the results at'the workshop +.hide was held May 3, 2016. He said this report did not deal with I:ctISerVator. She said she would like to see some of these things addressed, hiring a specialist, but she was waking to find out where the money would come from other than raising tares. Commissioner Anderson said from a Planning Commission position and the, Comprehensive Plan the only thing the Planning Commission could do to assist retail sales tax improvement wound be to let zoning restrictions or zoning changes where more bbt.sinesses could locate. He said a City can't make retail sales happen. He said the City could facilitate it by not restricting business, He said return on investment (ROI) was mentioned in the report several times, but what did we spent to get it, the City did not. invest a penny to get it. He did iiot know what eke the City could do other than change Pic zoning structure, or cut hack on our restrictions to allow more businesses. Mr. Bates said the rclurn on investment was referring to hiring a marketing firm w help us develop a marketing program -and making sure if we are going to invest in capital improvement it would generate a return on that investment. Commissioner Anderson contmented the report discussed investment in infrastructure. Commissioner Johnson ommissioior- Johnson asked hew niui h of an impact the Planning Commission would have on the development of iat#-i•as-ructure. Ms. Janssen said the Comprehensive flan is a road wrap to statrs ~work, it guides the pry graltls which are implemented, if implementing infrastructure vasa goal & policy in the Com \,ehensivc Plan then staff would work to towards programs or decisions which supported those mails and polices. Coramissicner Kelley said he felt it was more like a bit; picture, broad brush so when changes 'rune forward the Commission would know why things would be a certain way. 5-12-16 Planning Commission Minuias Raga 5 of S GOOD OF THE. ORDER: I .,cry uas nothing for the good of the order_ ADJOURNMENT: Ccrnmissior: Johnson tno+vec to adjourn the, tweeting at 7;U5 p.m. The mW on the motion was unanimous in favor, r:,4atoo passed. Chair Heather Graham Date signed Secretary Deanna 1-kurtort FEN011 GS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF TUE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING coteassior FOR CTA -21:11G -000t May 26, 2016 The following itndings are consistent }vith the Planning Commission's decision to recommend approval. Background: I. Spokane Valley development rcgulaticms were adopted in September 2007 and became effective on October 2S, 24 7. 2 Ci'A-2016-0001 is a city initiated text One rtdntent proposing the arncnd chapter 19..85 Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC), 19.l2C .050, arid Appendix A Iy (1) adding definition sfor medical marijuana endorsed retail stores, marijuana ijuana cooperatives, and marijuana clubs, (2) prohibiting any new licensed marijt:tutts retail stores from all zones. (3) allowing existing licensed marijuana retail stores to locate within tile exist ingdesignated zee incompliance with existing buffering requirements, (1)prohih ting marijuana cooperatives from all zones, (5) proh biting marijuana clubs or lounges from all zones, +:6j requiring any home -growing by qualified patients as allowed by state law to be conducted only; in single family residential Zones in permanent structures that are opaque and not visible by neighbors or from the public rights-of-way, and to clarify that renters may be required, as may be authorizers by federal, state, and local laws, to give notice to landlords of their intention to €;raw marijuana plants ir. a rental dwelling. 3. The Planning Commission held a public hearing and conducted deliberations on May l2, 20:6. The Planning Commission voted 5-2 to recommernd approval to City Council. Planning Commission Findings: 1. Compliance with SV71'MC 17,80.1150E Approval Criteria a. The proposed city initiated carte taxi amendment is consistent with the applic:,rblct provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. tr indtns(s)t LUP-1.1t : Maintain and protect the character of existing and future residential neighborhoods through the development and enforcement (tithe City's land w e .uggulirtions and joint planning. LTU -1.2: Protect residential areas frons impacts of adjacent non-residential uses and/or higher intensity uses through the development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations and joint planning. Land Csc Gaal LUP-10.2: Encourage a diverse array of industries to locate iin Spa atse walls}'. .toner is Cana1 EDO-7: 7: Maintain a regulatory environment that offers tlexihi lite, consistency, predictability and clear direction. Economic Policy EDP -7.1: Evaluate, monitor and improve level opiiser.t standar] . to promote compatibility between adjacent land uses; and update permitting proCcsses to CCSUre :1 -at ti:Cy are equitable, cost-effective, and expeditious, Economic Policy EDP -7.2: Review development regaldt'ors periods al]} to Ln 4ire cl:lrit'r, ccrisistc:ncy and predictability. Hann inc Commission Find ingsand Recornmen dations CTA -2.0 1 -DO P.11 •1 :.r Neighborhood Policy NP 2.1: liriaint; in and protect the character of existing and future residential neighborhoods through the develop:nem3t and enforcement cf the City's Innd rise regulations and joint planning. h. The proposed City -initiated amendment hears a substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. Cinding(s): The proposed amendment will allow compliance with state law and allow existing state - licensed recreational and medical marijuana businesses to continue to operate within the Spokane Valley while separating such uses from identified sensitive uses and the City's existing and Future residential uses. Further Ilio amendment will limit additional adverse impacts from new marijuana uses on other existing commercial uses. Finally, the proposed amendment will protect die residential character of residential neighborhoods. 2. Cuticlusion(s): a. The proposed text amendment is consistent with iii 'r,-:-' ; ,:ci ii:: d Comprclicnsk.c Pan and the approval criteria contained in SVMC l 7.S[). l Ib_ Tit The Growth Management. Act stipulates tl;:t the '.ret �I I:ti°rz i�c rani'. Aso ltl2n 3:.d ::c :IOpmenC re ulatioirs shall be subject to continuin,i .iivi Recommend The Spokane Valley Plan -tint. Commission aiL...;rr t y4 ,rj^r .:cl 2ily- initla[L'cd conic text amendments to chapter 19.8.:1 ' 'i':If.. i int ' 9,i'+1t1�1 tilt. AI 7e:Iaix A. Approved t itis 25th day of May, 201 G FLeather Graham, Cbainean Deanna Horton, Planing Commission Secretary Planning Commission Findings and Rena mnierdationsLTA-2016-AO01 fuze ofl Chair Graham called pledge of allegiance. staff were present: Kevin Anderson Heather Graham James Johnson Tim Kelley Mike Phillips Suzanne Stathos Joe Stcy Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers — City Hall, May 26 2016 the meeting to order at 6;03 p.m. Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the Administrative Assistant Deanna Horton took roll and the following members and Jahn Holman, Community & Economic Development Director Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney Gabe Gal linger, Development Services Manager Mike Basinger, Economic Development Coordinator Henry Allen, Development Services Engineer Adarn Jackson, Development Services Asst. Engineer Chat Bates, Economic Development Specialist Deanna Horton, Secretary of the Cornniis,.ion Cotrtutissionrer Stay moved to accept the May 26, 2016 agenda as presented_ ale was seven irr favor, zero against cold the motion passed. Commissioner 5toyr uroved to approve tire May 12, 2016 minutes as presented TIJ, twice isua .)e i•err in favor, zero against and the notion passed. COMMJSSION REPORTS: The Commissioners had no report. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Community & Economic Development Directcr John Hohman said he wanted to clarify what he had said the night of the May 3, 2016 joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting. Mr. Holtman handed out a transcript of what he said at that meeting, "I would like to remind the City Council, we have actively been working on the Corarprehensive Plan. This is the 126' visit we have had since the begiiming of the year_ If you remember errrber• We have had the retail improvement study, st•e talked abut fottrisrn. we talked about water districts, we have talked (tore/ number t+f things. The Planning Commission has beer: a bit &ehi!td fir Haat regard, (m receiving rhe presentations regarding completed studies) but we do intend to bring all of those presentations forward (to thelia). Bert the Plararring Con mraissIIan had some very important legislation that they were working on in relation to taaarrfurnna uses, so they have been preoccupiedfar the fast several months on that. But once that has (movedfari.rar•d, next Tue.sdtay alight you will have a presentation an the retail improvement, their the water districts �widl folloiv. So anything that we have had with council, the Planning CtImmissiorr will receive as nelf. It will be just a little bit offset, but l think we con catch up pretty quickly here." Mr. Hallman said the words in parentheses had been added for clarifcativn. Be said staff have been working an Comprehensive Plan, taking presentations to City Council, but have not Itad the same presentations made to the Planning Commission. Staff will be bringing those forward so that the Commission has the same information as the Council does. Mr. Hohman said the staff and Planning Commission are a team, they provide support to each other, and he would never disparage the work the Ccmrnis$ionwas doing. if ever in the rutins anyone Itas a question about something he has said, or any other staff member has said, please free to call him at any time and talk to him. He said this evening's meeting is more ageing back to basics to understand the Comprehensive Plan and where it came from, what is in it and where it is going, because when it starts to conte before the Commission it will be a neo document instead of a redlined version of the old Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Graham later thanked Mr. Hahman for addressing the concerns expressed at the previous meeting. She said she did not understand why the Comprehensive Plan had been moving along but then had stopped. She appreciated the information and understanding where the Comprehensive Plan was now. Mr. Hohman said again, if any of the Commissioners have a question about anything which is going on, they should not hesitate to contact him and talk to him. PUBLIC COMMENT: There were no public comments. 05-26-16 Planning Commission Iwlinuics Page 2 of5 COIVIMISSION BUSINESS: A. Planning Commission Findings for CTA -2016-0001 - Proposed -amendments to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SV1VMC)19.85 Marijuana Uses, 19.120.050 Permitted Use Matrix and Appendix A Definitions Deputy City Attorney Erik Lamb explained the background leading up to the recommendation which the Planning Commission is forwarding to the City Council. The Planning Commission worked for several months on this subject to develop the proposal. A public hearing was held April 14, 2016 and the Commission informally agreed to modify the original proposal. On May 12, 2416 a new public hearing was held which produced the current recommendation.. Commissioner Stoy moved to approve the PlanningCeinrnission findings of fact, The vote on this motion was six in favor, one againstwith Commissioner Kelley dissenting. B. Study Session: Comprehensive Plan — Compre1rensive Planning Mr, Holman explained he was going to talk about the basics, talk about the cun-ent plan, and where the plan is are going_ Through tiie work the Economic Development division Inas been working on, including the retail improvement plan, the tourism study, and the marketing plan, the topic of land use continued to cone to the top. After speaking to several focus groups, we have reinforced what we already knew, office zones aren't working, Medium Density Residential isn't working, and this is crossing over to the City's ecotrornic development. The new Plan wiIl be a wholesale rewrite in a completely different format from the old one. It will be more user friendly, with more basic language, but people will not be able to compare the old and new side by side. Economic Development Coordinator Mike Basinger explained to the Commissioners how the City's first Comprehensive Pian was developed, the background, the Growth Management Act (GMA) requirements, Comprehensive Plan basics and what is currently in the City's plan and why it must be updated. Mr_ Basinger clarified there would be many €rpportrmities for the public to comment on the new Plan. Commissioner Johnson asked why the City CotineiI was asking, to have the Plan completed before the end of the year, as this only allows for foyer months to review, take public comment and forward a recommendation to the Council. Mr. Hohman explained the Council hard actually asked to have it done before the end of 2015. However in the middle of last year the work eame to a stop because the City was waiting for a population allocation for growth from Spokane County. This number is generated by the Spokane County Commissioners. In 2013 the Board of County Commissioners (BoCC) issued a number, however the methodology they used came into question. In May or June of 2415 the BoCC lost their challenge regarding their methodology. Froin June to October 2015 an effort was made to generate a new number. In early November 2015 the Planning Technical Advisory Committee (PTAC) worked with Department of Commerce to come tip with a good number. The PTAC presented it to the Steering Committee of Elected Officials (SCEO), which all BoCC Commiseiorrers are members. The SCEO voted to recommend the number from the PTAC. The BoCC feelsthis number does not allow for enough projected growth, and the BoCC has not approved a number. After speaking to the Department of Commerce, to our attorneys, to special council the City decided to rrrove forward with the number which was approved by the SCEO. We feel this number would be defensible. Commissioner Johnson asked what number the BoCC eras sugoesting. Mr. Holtman said it was the Office of financial Arfanagement medium population plus 12 percent. The County is still in discussions regarding this number. Mr. Basinger explained the Comprehensive Plan basics. The GMA requires certain elements and a land use map. The included elements must be consistent with the land use map. GMA requires a public participation process, and they look for that process. The City will turn to the document to guide where development should go, it is a tool to support grants. ]f the City has certain language in its Plan which will support certain elements and projects types this, in turn will support this as a framework for capital improvements, including Public Works Transportation improvement Plan, which would support certain grants, among others. Grants far street improvements are hew we get our share of the gasoline taxes back, for example. Q$.2$ -le Planning Commission Minute- Page 3 ors The required elements are: • Land Use — Where the projected population would be accomrrrodateci, land use designations, potential annexation areas, historic and cultural resources. The land use element is supplemented land use trap. Commissioner Graham asked where tura poreneia1 annexation areas would be considered raid Jraw would it be handled, MT. Basinger offered they would most likely be to the north or south of the City since east and west are impacted by other jurisdictions. The State does have a defined process for annexation. It would need to be incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan and then development regulations would need to be written for how it would be handled, Coii rYlissioner .412 erso. asked about the meed for annexation. Mr. Basinger said over time there will be a need for space to provide for future development, it also gives the City more e'er trul over the development. Commercial areas pay for themselves. Mr, Hohman offered the legal team is currently working on a presentation regarding annexation, which stafwill bring to the Commission after it is presented to the Council. • Transportation - Provide for the movement of people and goods, classification of streets and concurrency_ The classification determines our level of federal funding. The rnodes of transportation which are planned for are important. There are concems with some rail traffic, which drives the Bridging the Valley requests but then for economic development it is important to get a rail spur to bring in manufacturing. We must plan for transit and we are working with Spokane Transit Authority (STA) so that the timing of routes is better, and to provide shelters along Sprague. We must provide choices for people to commute, car, bike, walk, bus, however people want to get around. Capital Facilities — Public facilities and services to support future growth. Since the City does not own any of its own facilities, water, sewer, fire, we contract for these services, we make sure the other provider's goals are lining up with ours. The City has level ofservice standards for each of these providers and we review each of these standards and their plans to make sure these levels of standards are able to accommodate our citizens and the projected growth. • Housing, — Planning for housing to accommodate different demographic and socio- economic groups. Encourage housing near services, provide a variety of housing options, and provide techniques to ensure efficient use of land. Commissioner Stathos questioned the statistics of younger people not wanting a home and yard, feeling more multifamily housing is not good for the area. She said there is not enough available affordable housing the area. Mr. Basinger stated the studies show younger people leave the area but return in later life. The median age in the City is about 40 years old. There was some discussion regarding the economy of home ownership, the supply of housing, the change in mindset of home ownership over Living in inuitiwamily developments, younger people movingavuay after school and returning later to raise families, the housing stook in the Valley being more expensive due to larger lots, and density bonuses for affordable housing, ▪ Lid Iities — Knowing the location of existing utilities, working with the City's providers to have as much data as possible. Working with the electrical and gas providers to have as much inforniation as they are willing to share with the City. The water and sewer are maintained iri the Capital Facilities chapter. Economic Development —The City realizes this chapter was weak and in the new Plan will be developed to support many of the new strategic platforms the City will embark on, This will drive all of the new marketing, branding, and economic development strategies which the City is currently developing. • Natural Environment — Many of the plans the City has already put so much work into and developed will be referenced, smell as the Shoreline Master ?Ian, Parks Master Plan, and the same consultant who helped develop the Shoreline plan is helping to work on this chapter. • The Neighborhood chapter will be incorporated into the land use chapter. The City has not been in a positon to be able to assist in developing subarea planning for the neighborhoods. There needs to be some careful consideration before any more planning can he done in these areas. QS-2G-16 Planning Comrnisston Minutes page 4 ci S • Bike and Pedestrian Plan —TJiis is a great plan with some great ideas. The City Nrrs rho first to provide buffered bike lanes, people want to use thein, this plan has enabled the City to go after wants and enabled people to look at the City differently, but this plan belongs in the transportation element. Next generation Comprehensive Plan (Comp Plan) will be unique to the City, offer flexibility, be understandable, action oriented, it will drive the City work program, focused on analytics, drive economic development. It will be a streamlined document, and will not loot: like the old Comp Plan at all, After the Comp Plan has been approved, staff will be reviewing the development regulations to make sure they support the Comp Plan. Some of the thoughts moving forward regarding the Comp Plan are to consolidate some of the zoning districts: Cfftce/Garden Office/Commu.nity Commercial into Mixed Use, combine Medium Density Residential with High Density Residential, combine R-2/R-3/R-4 and consider a 5,000 square foot lot minimum, combine Light and Heavy Industrial zones. When the Commissioners asked the rationale behind reducing the minimum lot size in the residential areas, Mr. Basinger responded that Spokane County is developing at 5,000 square foot lots right outside of the City borders. This would be consistent with development in the area, the stakeholders have said that anything larger does not make it "pencil out." Mr. Basinger said in a development it difficult to tell the difference between 5,000, 6,000 or a 7,500 square foot lot, hut to someone who is trying to make some money it could mean one or two nacre lots. Many of the rezones the City Lias processed have been changing from R-2 to R-3 or R-4, mostly R-4. If the property is adjacent to the R-4 zone, the Hearing Examiner has to allow it based on the current regulations.. Commissioner Stoy commented 5,030 was a standard city lot size. Some of the other Commissioners had comments regarding the lot size, saying the Valley is known for `larger lots," were we going to go through and take the Homes off a 10,000 square foot lot and turn it into two lots? Mr. Basinger said, the reality is the larger lots are not going to get rezoned; the majority is already zoned for 10,000 and this will not change, this was designed more for infill lots. C. Study Session: Water Districts Discussion Development Engineer Henry Allen explained to the Commission that for the Comp Plan update the question arose as to what are all of our water districts doing, how important our water resources and water quality and quantity are to the City_ Do the water purveyors have the ability to keep adding development and capacity, so the City decided to look into this information, Development Engineer Adam Jackson stated that there are 16 water districts which serve the City. Eight of them are contained within the City, while the boundaries of the others reach outside the City limits. Three only serve a particular area and cannot be expanded; Kaiser, Pinecroft Mobile Horne Park and Holiday Mobile Horne Park. Mr. Jackson provided the statistics for each water district for their service population, annual water rights capacity, residential ]and capacity and water service area. One of the water districts seems to be at their capacity and others have plenty of capacity. It is impotent this information is in the Comp Plan, but staff is still working to determine what level of detail will be placed in the plan. Although this is a planning issue which we can't control we do need to know what is out there and what the City's limits are, if there are any. Mr. Hohman added there has been a bill in the state legislature, which did not pass the last session but is expected to pass in the future, to allow the water districts to convert their irrigation rights into municipal rights. There will have to be a study to determine Iiow much water is available, and where it is corning from but it must be adjudicated with Idaho. This is a touchy subject and a much discussed topic between the water districts and the Department of Ecology_ Mr_ Lamb explained ane of the reasons for collecting this information is a requirement for development concurrency and without it, development can't move forwvard. It was an issue for the City to know what the different water districts are doing, 05-26-16 Planning CommissE n Minutes Page Sas GOOD OF THE ORDER; Mr. Hohmun shared the ground breaking for City Hall would be Thursday Jure 51, 2016 at the site of the new City Flail, located at the corner of Sprague and Dartmouth. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Kelley moved to adjourn the meeting at 5:16 p.m. The vote on the motion was unanimous in favor, motion passed. ("I ale Chair Heather Graham Date signed EilYkrino Secretary Deanna Horton Spokane County Sheriff's Office Regional Intelligence Group 9 8.0 Selected Incodenta Withi.n 112 MIlc of Canna Hous@ (9615 E Sprague) Opened C7/01/2015 Jul 1.201.4- 0c~20,20114 Al 1.2015- 0dc20,2005 pmc21,2014- D0C31,1014 lan1,2018. Juin 310.2015 rata) 911.A 9a in 5 SS 313 2 15 58 ALMIC 3t1 19 AL MH 3 S 0 1 10 ALMR 2 5 G 10 ALMU 2 1 0 5 AA^UE 43 38 1 25 104 A5L7 13 g ] 23 018 E3URGC 13 11 1 7 7.8 9urtGG 0 3 0 3 6 BURGA 14 13 0 13 40 33 52 2 27 114 C1IKEV 10 101 0 20 44 pGSpi}p 11 13 3 12 39 nc)n 0 1 0 0 1 OOMST 6 4 O 15 awes 6 15 0 7 28 DUI 20 l7 1 21 59 DV 23 94 1 11 90 OVOAS $ UP 1 16 35 OVOPV 12 9 {} 6 27 DVW 2 2. 0 1 5 =IGHT 2 0 22 16 =HALM 1 5 0 1 7 HAHA55 1 2 0 7 5 HALMS 5 11 0 8 25 PUNIC 2 13 6 3 19 SE33607 11 35' 0 2A 70 mum (retrod; 12,';1/2t15 1uI1,7ASC= C& 21# 2014 Ju11,21315- ?ec 20, 210ti X431,2011- Utc 21, 2014 Ian S,2015- Pun 34, X115 Toth PE RF 4 0 1� 0 1 12 PER'S' 2 PROWL 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 3 RAPE 1 1 RECICOR 31 44J 2 50 '32 RO'3 1 0 0 2 SEXCA1 U 1 SHOUT 9 5 0 2 16 SHOPL 23 38 3 46 110 STAR 0 2 o 0 3 STALK 2 1 4 1 a STP ROP 1 1 0 2 a SU ICA fi 9 0 3 1.8 SUSCI4 26 :'3 2 Aft 10 30 6 37 246 SUPER T3 43 91 4 58 1K, 5115VEH THE' 5 18 0 18 45 THREAT 3 8 1. It 10 TR8IU' d 9 0 S 2.1 TRESP 20 24 0 18 52 TS 525 433 30 479 1,467 JGUEST 6 0 2 12 ."EHPRO 5 fi 0 9 20 VE1-181:C 10 11 0 15 36 VEITFT 12 1.9 0 23 is WAfRNT 3 8 1 12 24 Tail 1,184 1,127 G8 1.261 1,841 mum (retrod; 12,';1/2t15 Spokane County Sheriffs Office Regional intelligence Group 9 CAD Selected Incidents WiN11r►1I2 Mile Or Cinder I1421 N MulIar�l opened 1610,i/2014 Or -1,2011- Sop 30,2014 Oct 1-2014- Sep X. PdtS OCT L.'•15- acc2+J,2015 "Mal 91.1A 103 2.2.7 75 25.. 1 0 at3l5uC 1 ARMC -1 23 3 57 ALMIH 4 ] n 17 ALMR 73 1 AL Mu 1 6 {} 1. ARGUE -08 61 11 120 ASLT 23 33 8 54 BuRGC 6 5 0 12 suxGG 3 tl d 3 RuacR 17 18 7 42 78 71 14 163 CHKEV 16 1S 9 43 DISQRL1 25 34 2 67 [ICA 3 1 3 7 5 3 13 CCntST 5 rr,UGS 24 2B 2 S4 ;LII 9S S6 13 2I7 5e 43 14 105 DVDPS 7 14 0 21 ACP,/ 10 {, 1 17 DW 1 1 1 3 FIGHT 8 7 0 15 FCRGER 0 1 0 1 FRAUD 2 3 1 5 HARASS 1 0 0 1 la' AWE. 14 7 0 21 PE01�1;7 PER0IT PE RF. PE RW FROST PROW L RAPE RECO RLIS R:[3C SLxC 11 SHOOT 5 HO Pl STAB STALK STP ROE' SU CA, SUSCFEE SIJSPEEI 3LJS4LH THEFT THRLAT ?RESP fGHPRC V.HTFT WARRNT Tw+ul Oct 1.20:3 - Sen 30, 2014 Oct 1. 2014 • Scp 34, 2025 Oct 1, 29:3 - Tatal Dec IC, 2015 1 $ 2 1.1 :1 .9 3 3$ 1 0 1 2 $' 7 11 15 0 0 2I T 1 12 3 2 L 6 3U0 350 75 725 4 0 10 1 2 1 2 6 0 1$ Ld 441 01 0 i 16 11 SS 58 58 j 6122 63 121. 49 223 59 15$ 20 264 65 47 6 L1$ 11 9 1 21 6 10 3 19 13 27 el d 46 535 i39 1.345 9 5 4 18 11 7 a 18 17 7 5 39 19 9 SE3 14 14 3 31 1,53 2,15E 449 4.570 Pure 2 612 hport Crea:ad: 17111/:111 Spokane County 5heriff'S Office Regional Intelligence Group 9 mow almiremembeek CAI) Serected Incidents Within 1/2 Mlle ofTreehau se 44421 E Tr 00 °paned 12/01/2014 9114 AIMC ALMA ARCU ASLT BUOG0 BURG:9 CC CAKEV ')I50PD LOA RJGS ]UI DV3PV 6VW FIGHT FRAUD cec1,EU13• IN or 30. 2014 0ec1,2014• 'I o++ 34, 2015 Dec 1,2015- Dec 20, 201S Tetal 61 75 3 L11 3 U 9 1 0 4 1 26 LZ 1 38 9 L(1 3 22 4 6 1 11 1 0 DI t 0 6 9 16 33 24 1 5a 1 2 d 3 5 2 0 13 1 2 , 3 7 6 C1 15 11 6 0 1.7 16 9 4 25 46 33 1 3C 5 9 0 LA 7 6 0 1 3 Z 0 e 0 0 5 HAR4$5 4 MALM5 14 PE MAO 5 PERBOT 1,3 PERF 1 Pact 7of7 Repan Crered: 12/2.1/ C15 Oe: 1, 2013 - NW, 20, 2114 Dec 1., 2314 - Nov 34, 2015 On 1.2015 - Trotz1 0e4 IA 2015 PEW 5 3 a 8 PROWL 2 0 0. 2 RAPE 0 1 0 L RE.NDR 27 35 5 69 RQRC 0 1 1 2 SEKC10 3 0 0 3 SHOOT S 1 0 6 SKIM 3 1 0 F 5TA@ 0 1 0 1 STACK ,1 1 0 1 STISROP 2 z 0 4 SLA CA 10 3 4 33 5USCI R 31 23 3 57 SUS P` R 41 33 1 75 SUSVEH 24 10 2 5E THEFT 31 I 22 2 SE TW1£AT 7 3 1n TRBI) 3 4 2 e TM SP 14 2 L, 1€ TS 1ES 211 4 3A1 u4UFST A 2 0 5 WEN PRL7 3 2 0 r^ VEHkEEG 4 4 4 8 VEHTFr 5 7 0 12 WARM T 10 T 1 1.8 Tram 670 655 33 1,368 Pact 7of7 Repan Crered: 12/2.1/ C15 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 28, 2016 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. Report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed Resolution 16-008 Amending the 2016 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council Adopted the 2016-2021 Six Year TIP on June 23, 2015, Resolution #15-005; Adoption of the 2016 Budget on November 10, 2015, Resolution #15-019; Adoption of the 2016 Amended TIP on February 9, 2016, Resolution 16- 005; Approved Motion Consideration, Allocation of federal earmark funds for the Barker Road/BNSF Grade Separation Project on April 5, 2016; Info RCA 2016 2nd Amended TIP, May 10, 2016, Admin Report RCA and discussion, May 24, 2016, and a Public Hearing on June 7, 2016. BACKGROUND: Council adopted the Amended 2016 TIP based upon information staff had at that time relative to grants received, available city funds and how these funds could be utilized for transportation projects. Added Projects: Sullivan Euclid PCC Intersection project: Since the adoption of the Amended 2016 TIP, the City received federal funding from SRTC for the Sullivan Euclid PCC intersection project. As Council may recall, back in April, 2014 the City applied for federal Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds through SRTC for the Sullivan Euclid PCC intersection project. At that time the project application did not get scored well enough to be funded but was placed on the STP contingency list. The contingency list was established so that in the event additional funds became available, projects on this list could be selected for funding. Surplus funds became available and SRTC designated $1.2 million for the Sullivan Euclid PCC intersection project. Barker Road/BNSF Grade Separation project: Back in 2009 WSDOT received an allocation of federal earmark funds for the "Development of highway -rail crossings in Spokane Co. WA & Kootenai Co, ID". In 2010 SRTC awarded these same funds to Spokane Valley for the Barker Road/BNSF Grade Separation project. This year the USDOT advised that any local earmark funds that were not spent would be repurposed to fund new projects. Rather than lose these earmark funds, Council approved moving forward with the final design phase of this project. Bridging the Valley - Pines Road Grade Separation; Pinecroft Property Acquisition project: This project was included in the 2016 Budget and is, therefore, being added to the 2016 TIP. This is an advanced purchase so that the property is acquired and protected from being developed to allow for the realignment of Pines Road to cross under the BNSF railroad. City funds will be used for this right-of-way acquisition. However, this acquisition has been structured such that City funds used will qualify as local match on future federal grant funds awarded for the construction phase. Deleted Project: Sprague LID (Low Impact Development), Park to University project: This project has been removed because the grant funding has been delayed by the Department of Ecology for at least a year. Since the City uses Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) monies as matching funds for state and federal grants, this amendment to the current -year TIP is necessary to meet the state law that requires REET funds to only be used on projects that have been identified in an adopted plan. OPTIONS: 1) Adopt the 2nd Amended 2016 TIP with or without additional changes; or 2) take further action deemed appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to Approve Resolution 16-008, adopting the 2016 amended TIP. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: There are sufficient REET funds to meet the local match requirements for these projects. STAFF CONTACT: Steve Worley, PE, Senior Capital Projects Engineer Eric Guth, PE, Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: Draft 2nd Amended 2016 TIP Resolution 16-008, Draft 2nd Amended 2016 TIP DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 16-008 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE 2016 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, the Spokane Valley City Council Adopted Resolution No. 15-005, the 2016-2021 Six- Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), subsequently amended by Resolution No. 16-005 with such program acting as a guide for the coordinated development of the City's transportation system; and WHEREAS, changes in certain funding sources and project schedules have occurred; and WHEREAS, the attached 2nd Amended 2016 TIP incorporates said changes for year 2016; and WHEREAS, the amendments to the 2016 TIP are consistent with Spokane Valley' s adopted Comprehensive Plan. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, as follows: Section 1. The City Council hereby adopts the attached 2nd Amended 2016 TIP for the City of Spokane Valley for the purpose of guiding the design, development and construction of local and regional transportation improvements for the year 2016. Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Section 2. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect upon adoption. Adopted this 28th day of June, 2016. City of Spokane Valley L.R. Higgins, Mayor ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Resolution 16-008 Amending 2016 TIP City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works 2nd AMENDED DRAFT 2016 Transportation Improvement Program Resolution 16-#44#, (6.28.2016 ) Proj. # Project From Primary City Total 2016 To Source Amount Project Costs 1 0155 Sullivan West Bridge 2 0123 Mission Ave Improvement Project (PE/RW Only) 3 0222 Citywide Reflective Signal Backplates (PE/CN) 4 0221 McDonald Rd Road Diet 5 0234 Seth Woodard Elementary Sidewalk Imp 6 0205 Sprague / Barker Intersection Improvements (PE Only) 7 2016 Street Preservation Projects 0233 Broadway Preservation 0235 Sullivan Rd. Preservation (NB Lanes) 0229 32nd Ave Preservation 0240 Saltese 8 0226 Appleway Preservation 9 0227 Appleway Shared Use Path (PE) 10 0236 Fancher/BNSF RR Overpass Joint Repair (PE/CN) 11 0238 Pines Road (SR27) Mirabeau Parkway Intersection 12 0221 McDonald Rd Preservation Project 13 0239 Bowdish Sidewalk Project 14 0207 Indiana/Evergreen Transit Access 15 0166 Pines (SR-27)/Grace Intersection Safety Project 16 0167 Citywide Safety Improvements (Bike/Ped.) 17 0201 ITS Infill Project (CN) 18 0237 Appleway Trail (PE) 19 0141 Sullivan Euclid PCC (RW & PE) 20 0143 Barker Rd - BNSF Grade Separation (PE) 21 0237 BTV - Pines Rd Grade Separation; Pinecroft Property Acq. (RW) Sullivan Flora Various locations 16th Mission Sprague @ Various locations Sullivan Spokane River Dishman Mica Houk Park Pines Fancher @ Pines @ 8th 12th Indiana @ Pines (SR 27) @ Various locations Various locations Sullivan Sullivan @ Wellesley Mirabeau Pkwy @Spokane River Barker Mission Park Barker Moore Flora Pit Road Pines 24th Dishman Mica Evergreen BNSF RR Mirabeau Pkwy Mission 8th Evergreen Grace Ave Corbin Euclid Trent (SR 290) BNSF RR BR $ STP(U) $ HSIP $ HSIP $ CDBG $ Developer $ City $ 1,010,000 43,000 9,000 3,000 11,580 12,000 3,050,000 $ 6,980,000 $ 273,000 $ 81,000 $ 574,000 $ 358,790 $ 50,000 $ 3,050,000 STP(U) $ 11,000 $ 83,000 STP(U)/TAP $ 31,000 $ 145,000 City $ 201,000 $ 201,000 TIB $ 28,149 $ 446,338 TIB $ 7,100 $ 1,244,730 TIB $ 222,912 $ 506,342 STA $ - $ 85,000 HSIP $ - $ 562,000 HSIP $ - $ 154,000 CMAQ $ 35,790 $ 265,115 State $ 57,500 $ 383,000 STP(UL) $ 10,850 $ 80,300 Fed Discr $ 150,000 $ 510,000 City $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 5,393,881 $ 16,532,615 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Funded Projects Added Projects \\svfsl\Public Folders\Public Works\Capital Projects\CIP-TIP Funding\2016-2021 TIP\2016 2nd Amended TIP\Public Hearing\Draft 2nd Amended 2016 TIP.xlsx 5/31/2016 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 28, 2016 Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ information ❑ admin. report Department Director Approval: ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed Resolution 16-009: Adoption of the 2017-2022 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010, Perpetual advanced six-year plans for coordinated transportation program expenditures. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Draft 2017-2022 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Information Only RCA to Council on May 10, 2016; Administrative report and discussion May 24th, 2016, public hearing June 7, 2016. BACKGROUND: The City is required by RCW 35.77.010 to prepare and, after holding a public hearing, adopt a revised and extended comprehensive transportation program for the ensuing six calendar years. This plan must be submitted to the Washington State Department of Transportation by July 1st each year. This year's TIP continues an emphasis on street preservation projects pursuant to adopted Council goals. Street preservation projects are included for each year in this six-year TIP. Staff reviewed historical funding levels for federal, state and City funds from the past five years to estimate projected funding levels available during the next six years. The Six -Year TIP is required to be financially constrained and reflect realistic expectations of annual funding levels. OPTIONS: 1) Adopt the 2017-2022 Six -Year TIP as presented, or 2) Adopt the 2017-2022 Six - Year TIP with revisions. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Resolution 16-009, adopting the 2017-2022 Six -Year TIP as presented. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The City's match on federal and state funded projects is typically between 13.5% and 20%. Projected REET funds through 2022 indicate that there are sufficient funds to provide the City's match for the recommended projects. STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Worley, PE — Capital Improvement Program Manager Eric Guth, PE - Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: 1) Resolution 16-009 2) 2017-2022 Six -Year TIP 3) Project Summary Sheets 4) Map of 2017-2022 Six Year TIP Projects DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 16-009 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE 2017-2022 SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, AND OTHER MATTERS RELATED THERETO. WHEREAS, to provide for the proper and necessary development of the street system within the City of Spokane Valley, the City shall, as required by State law, develop and adopt annually a Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program ("Six -Year TIP") with such program acting as a guide for the coordinated development of the City's transportation system; and WHEREAS, the Six -Year TIP of the City shall specifically set forth those projects and programs of both City and regional significance that benefit the transportation system and promote public safety and efficient vehicle movements; and WHEREAS, the Six -Year TIP shall be consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan and be adopted following one or more public hearings before the City Council; and WHEREAS, a draft copy of the Six -Year TIP was submitted to the Washington State Department of Commerce and has been reviewed and approved prior to the scheduled adoption of the TIP in accordance with RCW 36.70A.106; and WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing on June 7, 2016, for the purpose of inviting and receiving public comment on the proposed Six -Year TIP. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, as follows: The City Council hereby adopts the attached Six -Year TIP for the City of Spokane Valley for the purpose of guiding the design, development and construction of local and regional transportation improvements for the years 2017 through 2022. The City Clerk is directed to file the 2017-2022 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program with the Washington State Secretary of Transportation before July 1. The TIP shall be reviewed at least annually for the purpose of determining the work to be accomplished under the program and the City transportation requirements. Adopted this 28th day of June, 2016. City of Spokane Valley L.R. Higgins, Mayor ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Resolution 16-009, Adopting Six -Year TIP Spokane .Valley City of Spokane Valley Public Works Department, "DRAFT" 2017 - 2022 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program June 28, 2016 Resolution No. 1'6-00# Funding Sources: • ARRA • BR • City • CDBG • CMAQ • Developers • EECBG • FHWA • FMSIB • HSIP • HUD • REET • Other Fed • Other RR • Other State • SP • SRTS • SW • STA • STP(E) • STP(U) • TA • TIB • UAP • UCP • WSDOT • WTSC • WUTC City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works 2017 — 2022 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Glossary & Abbreviations American Recovery & Reinvestment Act Bridge Replacement Program City Funds Community Development Block Grant Congestion Management/Air Quality Private Developer Funds Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Federal Highway Administration Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Program Highway Safety Improvement Program Housing & Urban Development Real Estate Excise Tax Misc. Federal Funding Sources Railroad Funding Misc. State Funding Sources TIB Sidewalk Program Safe Routes to School City Stormwater Funds Spokane Transit Authority Surface Transportation Program (Enhancement) Surface Transportation Program (Urban) Transportation Alternatives Transportation Improvement Board TIB Urban Arterial Program TIB Urban Corridor Program Washington Department of Transportation Washington Traffic Safety Commission Washington Utilities & Transportation Commission Spakane .Valley Funding Status: • S Project Funding is Secured • P Project Funding is Planned. The Most Probable Funding Sources have been Identified. Project Phases: • PE Preliminary Engineering • RW Right -of -Way • CN Construction Construction Type: • PCC Portland Cement Concrete • HMA Hot Mix Asphalt • ITS Intelligent Transportation System (Integrated Traffic Signal Control Systems) • S/W Sidewalk Street Functional Classifications: Urban: • 14 • 16 • 17 • 19 Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Collector Arterial Local Access Spokane Valley Project / Description / Current Status 2017 - 2022 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Length PE RW CN Total Funding Sources 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total 1 Appleway - Park to Dishman Mica Preservation S Grind and Overlay, ADA Upgrades Funded with STP(U) funds. 1.1 0 3 1,068 1,071 City 144 144 STP(U) 927 927 Project Total 1,071 1,071 2 2017 Street Preservation Projects P Pavement Preservation Projects: Fund 311 Ongoing, yearly 0 176 0 2,024 2,200 City 2,200 2,200 Project Total 2,200 2,200 3 Sullivan / Euclid Concrete Intersection (RW/CN) S Reconstruct intersection in concrete pavement Funding secured for PE & RW, (SRTC #09-06); City Project #141 0 0 0 2,082 2,082 City 323 323 STP(U) 1,199 1,199 TIB 560 560 Project Total 2,082 2,082 4 Appleway Trail - Sullivan to Corbin S Shared Use Path along Old Milwaukee R/R ROW Moved forward to 2016 1.33 0 0 1,853 1,853 City 302 302 RCO 708 708 COM 843 843 Project Total 1,853 1,853 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an, are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/15/2016 Page 1 Spokane _Valley Project / Description / Current Status 2017 - 2022 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Length PE RW CN Total Funding Sources 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total 5 North Sullivan ITS Project S Extend ITS conduit and controls along Sullivan Corridor CMAQ Funded 1.75 105 5 804 914 City 15 109 124 CMAQ 95 695 790 Project Total 110 804 914 6 Argonne - Broadway to Indiana S Pavement Preservation - Grind and Overlay Funded with STP(U) funds. 0.8 65 0 570 635 City 9 77 86 STP(U) 56 493 549 Project Total 65 570 635 7 9th Ave Sidewalk, Raymond to University P New Sidewalks on the north side of 9th Ave, Raymond to University Awaiting Funding 0.125 40 0 200 240 City 8 40 48 Other- 32 160 192 FTA Project Total 40 200 240 8 Sullivan -Wellesley Intersection Imp Project S Traffic Signal or Roundabout 0.25 198 120 1,052 1,360 City 34 8 142 184 CMAQ 218 48 910 1,176 Project Total 252 56 1,052 1,360 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an, are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/15/2016 Page 2 Spokane _Valley Project / Description / Current Status 2017 - 2022 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Length PE RW CN Total Funding Sources 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total 9 Sprague - Sullivan to Corbin Preservation S Pavement Preservation, ADA upgrade Funded with STP(U) funds. 0.85 265 0 1,502 1,767 City 36 203 239 STP(U) 229 1,299 1,528 Project Total 265 1,502 1,767 10 Barker Road / BNSF Grade Separation Project P Construct Grade Separation at Barker/BNSF RR/ Trent (SR290) FY09 Federal Earmark for $720K, 20% of CN (up to $10M) received from FMSIB 0.5 2,473 2,418 31,144 36,035 City 62 81 290 729 243 1,405 Other 710 935 3,410 8,577 2,859 16,491 Fed Other 32 41 149 374 125 721 State Other- 15 10 79 224 75 403 RR Other 781 1,007 2,271 5,045 1,682 10,786 Fed FMSIB 1,246 3,737 1,246 6,229 Project Total 1,600 2,074 7,445 18,686 6,230 36,035 11 Park Road #2 - Broadway to Indiana (RW & CN) 0.75 0 150 2,877 3,027 City 20 388 408 p STP(U) 130 2,489 2,619 Reconstruct to a 3 -lane section with curb, sidewalks, bike lanes and stormwater facilities PE Funding 6/2009 Project Total 150 2,877 3,027 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an, are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/15/2016 Page 3 Spokane _Valley Project / Description / Current Status 2017 - 2022 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Length PE RW CN Total Funding Sources 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total 12 Pines (SR27)/ BNSF Grade Seperation Project 0 1,200 3,000 15,565 19,769 City 68 68 270 584 990 p Other 810 810 3,235 7,004 11,859 Fed Other- 68 68 270 584 990 RR Railroad underpass at Pines (SR -27) / BNSF / Trent TIB 405 405 1,618 3,502 5,930 Project Total 1,351 1,351 5,393 11,674 19,769 13 Sprague / Barker Intersection Improvements P Intersection capacity improvements. Pending Barker Road Corridor Study Developer + City Partnership 0 39 12 422 474 City 237 237 DEV 237 237 Project Total 474 474 14 Appleway Shared Use Path - Pines Rd to s Evergreen Rd Construct Shared Use Pathway along abandoned RR R -O -W Funded with STP(U) funds. 1 0 0 1,926 1,926 City 414 414 STP(U) 921 921 TAP 591 591 Project Total 1,926 1,926 15 2018 Street Preservation Projects P Pavement Preservation Projects: Fund 311 Ongoing, yearly 0 176 0 2,024 2,200 City 2,200 2,200 Project Total 2,200 2,200 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an, are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/15/2016 Page 4 Spokane _Valley Project / Description / Current Status 2017 - 2022 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Length PE RW CN Total Funding Sources 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total 16 Coleman Road Sidewalk, 4th to 2nd Ave's P 0.125 25 0 145 170 City 5 29 34 Other- 20 116 136 FTA Sidewalks on one side of Coleman from 4th to 2nd Ave. Transit Access to STA bus stops. Awaiting Funding Project Total 25 145 170 17 Argonne Road Concrete Pavement - 1-90 to p Montgomery 0.25 512 0 3,211 3,723 City 102 642 744 TIB 410 2,569 2,979 Reconstruct pavement in concrete; OCI Mullan to Knox 24, OCI Knox to Montgomery 35 (2014 Rpt) Project Total 512 3,211 3,723 18 Appleway Trail - Evergreen to Sullivan S Construct Shared Use Pathway along abandoned Railroad Right -of -Way 1 110 0 1,535 1,699 City CMAQ 22 207 229 142 1,328 1,470 Project Total 164 1,535 1,699 19 Citywide Sidewalk Infill Project 1 140 30 830 1,000 City 40 40 40 40 40 200 P CDBG 40 40 40 40 40 200 SRTS 40 40 40 40 40 200 Infill gaps in Sidewalks and add sidewalks to access completed portions of the Appleway Trail. TIB 40 40 40 40 40 200 Other - 40 40 40 40 40 200 FTA Project Total 200 200 200 200 200 1,000 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an, are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/15/2016 Page 5 Spokane _Valley Project / Description / Current Status 2017 - 2022 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Length PE RW CN Total Funding Sources 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total 20 Evergreen Resurfacing - Mission Connector to 0.7 66 0 591 656 City 4 84 88 s Indiana STP(U) 28 540 568 Grind and inlay HMA, Bike Lane Positive Guidance thru the 1-90 EXIT 291-A Project Total 32 624 656 21 Sullivan -Trent (SR -290) to Wellesley Corridor 0.3 90 50 600 740 City 12 62 74 p Lighting HSIP 104 562 666 Street lighting, ROW Project Total 116 624 740 22 Appleway Trail - University Rd. to Balfour Park 0.5 110 120 520 750 City 102 102 S TAP 198 198 CMAQ 450 450 Extend Shared Use pathway to Balfour Park Project Total 750 750 23 2019 Street Preservation Projects P Pavement Preservation Projects: Fund 311 Ongoing, yearly 0 176 0 2,024 2,200 City 2,200 2,200 Project Total 2,200 2,200 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an, are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/15/2016 Page 6 Spokane _Valley Project / Description / Current Status 2017 - 2022 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Length PE RW CN Total Funding Sources 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total 24 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan Concrete p Intersections (CN Only) Reconstruct intersections in concrete pavement ROW Obligated 11/2013 0 0 0 1,703 1,703 City 230 230 STP(U) 1,473 1,473 Project Total 1,703 1,703 25 Mission Ave. - Flora Rd. to Barker Rd. (CN) P 1 0 0 3,969 3,974 City 536 536 TIB 1,719 1,719 STP(U) 1,719 1,719 Widen existing rural roadway to an urban street section to include bike lanes, curbs, sidewalks, and stormwater swales. Project Total 3,974 3,974 26 Broadway Improvement Project - Flora to p Barker 0 543 500 4,163 5,206 City 159 883 1,042 TIB 634 3,530 4,164 Extend Broadway arterial to Barker Rd, Realign Broadway connection east of Barker 3 -Lane Urban Section Project Total 793 4,413 5,206 27 Evergreen & Broadway ITS P 2 206 80 1,584 1,870 City 36 217 253 CMAQ 230 1,387 1,617 ITS along Broadway from Pines Rd (SR -27) to Evergreen, along Evergreen from Sprague to 16th Ave. 2018-2020 CMAQ Grant Application funding Project Total 266 1,604 1,870 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an, are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/15/2016 Page 7 Spokane _Valley Project / Description / Current Status 2017 - 2022 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Length PE RW CN Total Funding Sources 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total 28 2020 Street Preservation Projects P Pavement Preservation Projects: Fund 311 Ongoing, yearly 0 176 0 2,024 2,200 City 2,200 2,200 Project Total 2,200 2,200 29 Barker Rd - Euclid to Trent Road P Reconstruct Barker to 3 -lane urban section 0.75 471 100 3,613 4,184 City 114 723 837 TIB 457 2,890 3,347 Project Total 571 3,613 4,184 30 Barker Rd Improvement Project - Appleway to 1- p 90 0.28 382 1,146 2,397 3,629 City 167 324 491 STP(U) 1,065 2,073 3,138 Widen and improve to 5 -lane urban section, Roundabout @ Broadway, Realign east leg of Broadway Project Total 1,232 2,397 3,629 31 Barker Rd Improvements - South City Limits to 0.81 326 25 2,502 2,854 City 46 340 386 p Appleway TIB 293 2,175 2,468 Widen and Improve roadway to 3 -lane urban section Project Total 339 2,515 2,854 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an, are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/15/2016 Page 8 Spokane _Valley Project / Description / Current Status 2017 - 2022 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Length PE RW CN Total Funding Sources 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total 32 2021 Street Preservation Projects P Pavement Preservation Projects: Fund 311 Ongoing, yearly 0 176 0 2,024 2,200 City 2,200 2,200 Project Total 2,200 2,200 33 Pines 1-90 IC, City Intersection Imp Project P 0 250 300 1,300 1,850 City 54 196 250 CMAQ 346 1,254 1,600 Intersection Capacity Improvement for City Intersections along Pines @ Indiana, EB Ramp & Mission Project Total 400 1,450 1,850 34 Mirabeau/Mansfield Intersection Improvements 0 110 100 560 670 City 15 76 91 P CMAQ 95 484 579 Intersection Capacity Improvements Project Total 110 560 670 35 Argonne Rd &I-90 IC Bridge Widening P Widen Argonne Rd Bridge to 3 Lanes, SB. New 12' sidewalks. 0.1 900 0 5,760 6,660 City 122 144 266 FMSIB 634 634 STP(U) 778 4,982 5,760 Project Total 900 5,760 6,660 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an, are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/15/2016 Page 9 Spokane _Valley Project / Description / Current Status 2017 - 2022 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Dollars in Thousands Length PE RW CN Total Funding Sources 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total 36 Barker Rd Improvement Project - Spokane p River to Euclid Reconstruct and widen to 3 -lane urban section Developer Funds Rec'd 6/2014, $29,500 0.53 378 25 2,899 3,302 City 52 580 632 TIB 322 2,319 2,641 DEV 29 29 Project Total 403 2,899 3,302 37 2022 Street Preservation Projects P Pavement Preservation Projects: Fund 311 Ongoing, yearly 0 176 0 2,024 2,200 City 2,200 2,200 Project Total 2,200 2,200 Totals: 10,060 8,184 111,091 129,335 12,965 10,280 28,380 45,331 18,968 13,069 128,993 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, an, are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/15/2016 Page 10 S`pokan``�' 4" F Valley 2017-2022 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Totals Secured Projects Planned Projects Totals Year Federal State Other City Total Federal State Other City Total Federal State Other City Total 2017 $2,724 $2,111 $0 $863 $5,698 $2,463 $437 $83 $2,358 $5,341 $5,187 $2,548 $83 $3,221 $11,039 2018 $4,217 $0 $0 $837 $5,054 $3,156 $896 $315 $2,785 $7,152 $7,373 $896 $315 $3,622 $12,206 2019 $2,098 $0 $0 $328 $2,426 $13,136 $7,975 $349 $4,494 $25,954 $15,234 $7,975 $349 $4,822 $28,380 2020 $1,328 $0 $0 $207 $1,535 $25,687 $11,933 $808 $5,368 $43,796 $27,015 $11,933 $808 $5,575 $45,331 2021 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,953 $6,798 $104 $4,113 $18,968 $7,953 $6,798 $104 $4,113 $18,968 2022 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,840 $2,993 $0 $3,236 $13,069 $6,840 $2,993 $0 $3,236 $13,069 Total $10,367 $2,111 $0 $2,235 $14,713 $59,235 $31,032 $1,659 $22,354 $114,280 $69,602 $33,143 $1,659 $24,589 $128,993 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/15/2016 City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Projects Listed by Category for the 2017-2022 Six -Year TIP Dollars in Thousands Arterial Improvements Project Name Sullivan -Wellesley Intersection Imp Project Park Road #2 - Broadway to Indiana (RW& CN) Mission Ave. - Flora Rd. to Barker Rd. (CN) Broadway Improvement Project - Flora to Barker Barker Rd - Euclid to Trent Road Barker Rd Improvement Project - Appleway to 1-90 Description Traffic Signal or Roundabout Start Year 2017 Reconstruct to a 3 -lane section with 2017 curb, sidewalks, bike lanes and stormwater facilities Widen existing rural roadway to an urban street section to include bike lanes, curbs, sidewalks, and stormwater swales. 2019 Extend Broadway arterial to Barker 2019 Rd, Realign Broadway connection east of Barker Reconstruct Barker to 3 -lane urban 2020 section Widen and improve to 5 -lane urban 2020 section, Roundabout @ Broadway, Realign east leg of Broadway Barker Rd Improvements - South City Widen and Improve roadway to 3 - Limits to Appleway lane urban section Barker Rd Improvement Project - Spokane River to Euclid Reconstruct and widen to 3 -lane urban section 2020 2021 Total: City Cost Total Cost $184 $1,360 $408 $3,027 $536 $3,974 $1,042 $5,206 $837 $4,184 $491 $3,629 $386 $2,854 $632 $3,302 $4,516 $27,536 Bridge Projects Project Name Barker Road / BNSF Grade Separation Project Pines (SR27)/ BNSF Grade Seperation Project Argonne Rd & 1-90 IC Bridge Widening Description Start Year Construct Grade Separation at 2017 Barker/BNSF RR/ Trent (SR290) Railroad underpass at Pines (SR -27) 2017 / BNSF / Trent Widen Argonne Rd Bridge to 3 2021 Lanes, SB. New 12' sidewalks. Total: City Cost Total Cost $1,405 $36,035 $990 $266 $2,661 $19,769 $6,660 $62,464 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Wednesday, June 15, 2016 Page 1 of4 City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Projects Listed by Category for the 2017-2022 Six -Year TIP Dollars in Thousands Congestion Improvements Project Name Sprague / Barker Intersection Improvements Pines 1-90 IC, City Intersection Imp Project Mirabeau/Mansfield Intersection Improvements Description Start Year Intersection capacity improvements. 2017 Pending Barker Road Corridor Study Intersection Capacity Improvement 2021 for City Intersections along Pines @ Indiana, EB Ramp & Mission Intersection Capacity Improvements 2021 Total: City Cost Total Cost $237 $474 $250 $1,850 $91 $670 $578 $2,994 Pedestrian/Bicycle Program Project Name Appleway Trail - Sullivan to Corbin 9th Ave Sidewalk, Raymond to University Appleway Shared Use Path - Pines Rd to Evergreen Rd Coleman Road Sidewalk, 4th to 2nd Ave's Appleway Trail - Evergreen to Sullivan Citywide Sidewalk Infill Project Appleway Trail - University Rd. to Balfour Park Description Start Year Shared Use Path along Old 2017 Milwaukee R/R ROW New Sidewalks on the north side of 2017 9th Ave, Raymond to University Construct Shared Use Pathway along 2017 abandoned RR R -O -W Sidewalks on one side of Coleman 2018 from 4th to 2nd Ave. Transit Access to STA bus stops. Construct Shared Use Pathway along 2018 abandoned Railroad Right -of -Way Infill gaps in Sidewalks and add sidewalks to access completed portions of the Appleway Trail. 2018 Extend Shared Use pathway to 2018 Balfour Park Total: City Cost Total Cost $302 $1,853 $48 $414 $34 $229 $200 $102 $1,329 $240 $1,926 $170 $1,699 $1,000 $750 $7,638 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Wednesday, June 15, 2016 Page 2 of4 City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Projects Listed by Category for the 2017-2022 Six -Year TIP Dollars in Thousands Safety Program Project Name Description Start Year Sullivan -Trent (SR -290) to Wellesley Street lighting, ROW 2018 Corridor Lighting Total: City Cost Total Cost $74 $740 $74 $740 Street Preservation Projects Project Name Appleway - Park to Dishman Mica Preservation 2017 Street Preservation Projects Argonne - Broadway to Indiana Sprague - Sullivan to Corbin Preservation 2018 Street Preservation Projects Evergreen Resurfacing - Mission Connector to Indiana 2019 Street Preservation Projects 2020 Street Preservation Projects 2021 Street Preservation Projects 2022 Street Preservation Projects Description Start Year Grind and Overlay, ADA Upgrades 2017 Pavement Preservation Projects: 2017 Fund 311 Pavement Preservation - Grind and 2017 Overlay Pavement Preservation, ADA upgrade 2017 Pavement Preservation Projects: 2018 Fund 311 Grind and inlay HMA, Bike Lane 2018 Positive Guidance thru the 1-90 EXIT 291-A Pavement Preservation Projects: 2019 Fund 311 Pavement Preservation Projects: 2020 Fund 311 Pavement Preservation Projects: 2021 Fund 311 Pavement Preservation Projects: 2022 Fund 311 Total: City Cost Total Cost $144 $2,200 $86 $239 $2,200 $88 $2,200 $2,200 $2,200 $2,200 $13,757 $1,071 $2,200 $635 $1,767 $2,200 $656 $2,200 $2,200 $2,200 $2,200 $17,329 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Wednesday, June 15, 2016 Page 3 of4 City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Projects Listed by Category for the 2017-2022 Six -Year TIP Dollars in Thousands Street Reconstruction Projects Project Name Description Start Year City Cost Total Cost Sullivan / Euclid Concrete Reconstruct intersection in concrete 2017 $323 $2,082 Intersection (RW/CN) pavement Argonne Road Concrete Pavement - Reconstruct pavement in concrete; 2018 $744 $3,723 1-90 to Montgomery OCI MuIlan to Knox 24, OCI Knox to Montgomery 35 (2014 Rpt) Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan Reconstruct intersections in concrete 2019 $230 $1,703 Concrete Intersections (CN Only) pavement Total: $1,297 $7,508 Traffic Operations and Maintenance Project Name North Sullivan ITS Project Evergreen & Broadway ITS Description Start Year City Cost Total Cost Extend ITS conduit and controls 2017 $124 $914 along Sullivan Corridor ITS along Broadway from Pines Rd 2019 $253 $1,870 (SR -27) to Evergreen, along Evergreen from Sprague to 16th Ave. Total: $377 $2,784 Overall Total: $24,589 $128,993 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Wednesday, June 15, 2016 Page 4 of4 City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 2017 - 2022 Dollars in Thousands 2017 Item # Project Name 2 Appleway - Park to Dishman Mica Preservation 3 Appleway Shared Use Path - Pines Rd to Evergreen Rd 4 Appleway Trail - Sullivan to Corbin 5 Sullivan / Euclid Concrete Intersection (RW/CN) 6 Sullivan -Wellesley Intersection Imp Project 7 2017 Street Preservation Projects 8 9th Ave Sidewalk, Raymond to University 9 Argonne - Broadway to Indiana 10 Barker Road / BNSF Grade Separation Project 11 North Sullivan ITS Project 12 Park Road #2 - Broadway to Indiana (RW & CN) 13 Pines (SR27)/ BNSF Grade Seperation Project 14 Sprague - Sullivan to Corbin Preservation Primary Source STP(U) STP(U) COM STP(U) CMAQ City Other - FTA STP(U) Other Fed CMAQ STP(U) Other Fed STP(U) City Amount 144 414 302 323 34 2,200 8 9 62 15 20 68 36 Total Amount 1,071 1,926 1,853 2,082 252 2,200 40 65 1,600 110 150 1,351 265 2017 Totals: $3,635 $12,965 2010 Item # Project Name 1 Sprague / Barker Intersection Improvements 6 Sullivan -Wellesley Intersection Imp Project 8 9th Ave Sidewalk, Raymond to University 9 Argonne - Broadway to Indiana 10 Barker Road / BNSF Grade Separation Project 11 North Sullivan ITS Project 13 Pines (SR27)/ BNSF Grade Seperation Project 14 Sprague - Sullivan to Corbin Preservation 15 Sullivan -Trent (SR -290) to Wellesley Corridor Lighting 16 2018 Street Preservation Projects 17 Appleway Trail - Evergreen to Sullivan 19 Argonne Road Concrete Pavement - 1-90 to Montgomery 20 Citywide Sidewalk Infill Project 21 Coleman Road Sidewalk, 4th to 2nd Ave's 22 Evergreen Resurfacing - Mission Connector to Indiana Primary Source DEV CMAQ Other - FTA STP(U) Other Fed CMAQ Other Fed STP(U) HSIP City CMAQ TIB Other - FTA Other - FTA STP(U) City Amount 237 8 40 77 81 109 68 203 12 2,200 22 102 40 5 4 Total Amount 474 56 200 570 2,074 804 1,351 1,502 116 2,200 164 512 200 25 32 2018 Totals: $3,208 $10,280 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Added Projects are shown in Green Funded Projects are shown in Blue Wednesday, June 15, 2016 Page 1 of 3 2010 Item # Project Name 6 Sullivan -Wellesley Intersection Imp Project 10 Barker Road / BNSF Grade Separation Project 13 Pines (SR27)/ BNSF Grade Seperation Project 15 Sullivan -Trent (SR -290) to Wellesley Corridor Lighting 18 Appleway Trail - University Rd. to Balfour Park 19 Argonne Road Concrete Pavement - 1-90 to Montgomery 20 Citywide Sidewalk Infill Project 21 Coleman Road Sidewalk, 4th to 2nd Ave's 22 Evergreen Resurfacing - Mission Connector to Indiana 23 2019 Street Preservation Projects 24 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan Concrete Intersections (CN Only) 25 Broadway Improvement Project - Flora to Barker 26 Evergreen & Broadway ITS 27 Mission Ave. - Flora Rd. to Barker Rd. (CN) Primary Source CMAQ Other Fed Other Fed HSI P CMAQ TIB Other - FTA Other - FTA STP(U) City STP(U) TIB CMAQ STP(U) City Amount 142 290 270 62 102 642 40 29 84 2,200 230 159 36 536 Total Amount 1,052 7,445 5,393 624 750 3,211 200 145 624 2,200 1,703 793 266 3,974 2019 Totals: $4,822 $28,380 2020 Item # Project Name 10 Barker Road / BNSF Grade Separation Project 12 Park Road #2 - Broadway to Indiana (RW & CN) 13 Pines (SR27)/ BNSF Grade Seperation Project 17 Appleway Trail - Evergreen to Sullivan 20 Citywide Sidewalk Infill Project 25 Broadway Improvement Project - Flora to Barker 26 Evergreen & Broadway ITS 28 2020 Street Preservation Projects 29 Barker Rd - Euclid to Trent Road 30 Barker Rd Improvement Project - Appleway to I- 90 31 Barker Rd Improvements - South City Limits to Appleway Primary Source Other Fed STP(U) Other Fed CMAQ Other - FTA TIB CMAQ City TIB STP(U) TIB City Amount 729 388 584 207 40 883 217 2,200 114 167 46 Total Amount 18,686 2,877 11,674 1,535 200 4,413 1,604 2,200 571 1,232 339 2020 Totals: $5,575 $45,331 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Added Projects are shown in Green Funded Projects are shown in Blue Wednesday, June 15, 2016 Page 2 of 3 2021 Item # Project Name 10 Barker Road / BNSF Grade Separation Project 20 Citywide Sidewalk Infill Project 29 Barker Rd - Euclid to Trent Road 30 Barker Rd Improvement Project - Appleway to 1- 90 31 Barker Rd Improvements - South City Limits to Appleway 32 2021 Street Preservation Projects 33 Argonne Rd &I-90 IC Bridge Widening 34 Barker Rd Improvement Project - Spokane River to Euclid 35 Mirabeau/Mansfield Intersection Improvements 36 Pines 1-90 IC, City Intersection Imp Project Primary Source Other Fed Other - FTA TIB STP(U) TIB City STP(U) TIB CMAQ CMAQ City Amount Total Amount 243 6,230 40 200 723 3,613 324 2,397 340 2,200 122 52 15 54 2,515 2,200 900 403 110 400 2021 Totals: $4,113 $18,968 2022 Item # Project Name 20 Citywide Sidewalk Infill Project 33 Argonne Rd &I-90 IC Bridge Widening 34 Barker Rd Improvement Project - Spokane River to Euclid 35 Mirabeau/Mansfield Intersection Improvements 36 Pines 1-90 IC, City Intersection Imp Project 37 2022 Street Preservation Projects Primary Source Other - FTA STP(U) TIB CMAQ CMAQ City City Amount 40 144 580 76 196 2,200 Total Amount 200 5,760 2,899 560 1,450 2,200 2022 Totals: $3,236 $13,069 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Added Projects are shown in Green Funded Projects are shown in Blue Wednesday, June 15, 2016 Page 3 of 3 1. Appleway-Park to Dishman Mica Preservation Appleway - Park to 054 Dishman Mica Preservation a Project Description: This pavement preservation project along Appleway from Park to Dishman Mica is a 4 -lane principal arterial and is a part of the 1-90 Business Route through Spokane Valley. Appleway is an eastbound one-way road section making up one half of the Sprague/ Appleway Couplet. This project will resurface and strengthen 1 mile of the existing pavement with a new thick asphalt overlay (2.5-3.5 inches). It will remove existing ruts and provide a sealed road surface to re-establish positive drainage. In addition to the road surface, all sidewalks will be field reviewed to verify that they meet current ADA requirements. Sidewalk and sidewalk ramps not meeting these requirements will be upgraded to meet the current standards. The project will also in- clude some stormwater treatment upgrades. Benefits of Project: This project was identified in the City's 2014 Pavement Management Analysis Report as Marginal. Marginal streets that display high amounts of load associated distresses are selected as a priority for rehabilitation as they provide the greatest cost benefit to the City—that is the greatest increase in life per rehabilitation dollar spent. This project extends the life of this street by replacing the surface pavement and strengthening the road, improving the ride, and upgrading the stormwater drainage for many years of service. Estimated Project Cost Right Of Way (RW) = $3,000 Construction (CN) = $1,068,000 Total Project Cost—$1,071,000 This project is fully funded using City and Federal STP Urban funds. 2, 15, 23, 28, 32, & 37. 2017-2022 Pavement Preservation Projects City of Spokane Valley 2017- 2022 Pavement Preservation Projects rh8on[Samery- Daynouth to Un mars Mrssor-.9c ,,,sh o PineE Euclid -SL I ea to Flora E6waw.ay-Sulliran m Cin 6 •iidw3y-HEr31d 1 MI to universy i• ■ 1' ■ ififtaiAllii Lin YE:m7VM3n ii r V. I -'"S.: ` .. i ' Er=rare ; y *- Ir =MIvenr tnMl z ''` 'kg mrrPSpT�ue m4 !' _ta AoEleAsal'. Dishnur.-Mica- Bth to 18th ,xeeenaores5m m R[P --.1� .'. i .. Hurtle Creek 3reenacres-9e.ge. Enei 113th -Herald r r 33W#JvmarMii®.�_ 2017 2018 .I -i 2019 l19C.McGenaldd m Everp e, tiO shmanca-Thorpe,` 6mWi,h 2020 ElarkerApplearay Do 9oa /way em-Earker m Flows 2017-2022 Preservation Projects Overlay P•oear.Artedals and Col ...tors SSLr`aoe TreatRkxt Frcjecm ' Dashed Lees aro Condngercq Projects 2021 2022 Project Description: Beginning with the 2011 budget, the City established Fund 311 — the "Pavement Preservation Fund". This fund sets aside funds each year to build pavement preservation projects. The fund is broken into these categories: Arterial and Collector Street Overlay Projects — 80% of the Pavement Preservation Fund, and Residential/Local Road Overlay and Reconstruction Projects — 20% of the Pavement Preservation Fund. Pavement Preservation Projects will be determined for each of the program years using the results of the Pavement Management Analysis Report, site visits, further geotechnical engineering and pavement studies, and citizen complaints. A project list will be developed each year and included in the City's yearly budget. Benefits of Project: Pavement preservation projects when constructed at the right time is one of the most cost effective uses of City transportation funds. Monitoring and strategically spending the City's resources on its streets using a pavement management program, field sur- veys, additional geotechnical testing—coupled with experience, achieves perpetual pavements that have been shown the most cost effective method to manage an agency's transportation system. Project Cost Estimate: These projects are paid for using City Funds established in Fund 311. In the 2017-2022 TIP the Pavement Preservation funds avail- able have been estimated to be $2.2 M per year. S„ okan�``` _Val ley 3. Sullivan/Euclid Concrete Intersection Su!livan/Euclid Concrete ,intersection (RWICN) Project uclldAve. = : 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Project Description: The existing intersection is experiencing severe rutting, pavement raveling, and longitudinal cracking. Heavy truck traffic contin- ues to destroy the pavement. Preservation of the existing pavement is not an option in that the existing pavement section does not have the structural integrity to support the heavy turning trucks. This project will reconstruct the intersection of Sullivan Rd and Euclid Ave by removing the existing asphalt pavement and replac- ing the roadbed with new base, steel reinforcement, and Portland cement concrete. Benefits of Project: To reconstruct this intersection using PCC Pavement at a designed depth to support the type of traffic using it will provide a long lasting intersection. This is the most cost effective solution and the least expensive over the long run for the taxpayer. The project also updates American's with Disabilities Act (ADA) upgrades at the intersection corners to comply with the requirements out- lined in Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act. Project Cost Estimate: Construction (CN) = $2,082,000 Total Project Cost—$2,082,000 IThis project is fully funded using City and Federal STP Urban funds. 4. Appleway Trail -Sullivan to Corbin Spokane Valley 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Project Description: This project will build 1.3 miles of the City's Appleway Trail beginning at Sullivan Road and extending to Corbin Road. The Trail will be a 12' hot mix asphalt shared -use path. The Appleway Trail project will be landscaped and include trees and an irrigation system. The trail will include lighting, benches, architectural features and stormwater facilities. Where the trail crosses Sullivan, a High intensity Activated crossWalK (HAWK) traffic signal is proposed. The HAWK signal is a safe- ty device that signals vehicles to stop allowing pedestrians to cross the roadway and then permit drivers to proceed as soon as the pedestrians have cleared the intersection. Benefits of Project: The Appleway Trail provides transportation choices that allow bikers and walkers to access services such as banking, postal and government services, retail services such as drug stores, supermarkets, office supply stores, and restaurants. In addition, the trail provides access to multi and family housing and schools along the corridor. Employees now have a safe choice to walk and bike to access jobs. The Appleway Trail provides facilities for healthy lifestyles giving people the opportunity to walk and ride bikes in a safe urban environment. Trail projects saves valuable fuel and eliminates green house gasses. Project Cost Estimate: Construction (CN) = $1,853,000 Total Project Cost—$1,853,000 5. North Sullivan ITS (Intelligent Transportation System) North Sullivan Road :. 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Project Description: 2022 North Sullivan is a principal arterial serving one of the City's major industrial areas. North Sullivan Road connects a State Highway on the North (SR -290) and 1-90 to the South. North Sullivan Road directly accesses the Spokane Valley Industrial Park which ac- cesses the BNSF and UP mainline tracks. This street carries a high volume of freight. The project installs the necessary infrastructure to establish a real time communications and control system to efficiently move traffic through the North Sullivan Corridor. The project includes new conduit , junction boxes, fiber optic cable, and communica- tion hardware. This system will tie directly into the traffic signals at the intersections at Central Pre -Mix, Marietta, Euclid, Kiernan and Trent Ave(SR-290). The project also installs cameras along the corridor for real time traffic observation. Benefits of Project: This project benefits the City by giving the City a powerful tool to monitor and implement traffic control to efficiently move traffic. Efficient traffic movement through a corridor results in lower dust levels (PM -10), reduced travel time, and less green house gas emissions. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) Right of Way (RW) Construction (CN) Total Estimated Project Cost = $105,000 = $5,000 = $804,000 = $914,000 This project is fully funded using City and Federal STP Urban funds. 6. Argonne -Broadway to Indiana Project Description: Argonne Road from Broadway to Indiana Avenue is a 3 -lane principal arterial. As identified in the City's Pavement Management Analysis Report, the pavement through this section is ready to receive a moderate depth hot mix asphalt overlay (1.5 to 2.5 inch- es). This project will review all existing pedestrian facilities and where deficient in terms of ADA will be updated. All broken side- walks will be replaced or restored. Benefits of Project: This project will apply a new pavement surface extending the life of the road. In addition to the road surface, all sidewalks will be field reviewed to verify that they meet current ADA requirements. Sidewalk and sidewalk ramps not meeting these requirements will be upgraded to meet the current standards. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) Construction (CN) Total Estimated Project Cost = $65,000 = $570,000 = $635,000 tken'' e�`�' Val ley 7. 9th Ave Sidewalk, Raymond to University 9th Ave Sidewalk Project Raymond l:r University . 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Project Description: The 9th Ave Sidewalk, Raymond to University Project will place 2 blocks of new sidewalk from the Sunshine Gardens residential care facility to University Road where transit access is available. Existing stormwater facilities will be upgraded to account for the installation of new curb. New ADA ramps will be added at the corners at the intersecting streets of Raymond, Oberlin, and Uni- versity roads. Benefits of the Project: This project will extend sidewalks from the Sunshine Gardens residential care facility where many long term patients live. Several patients are restricted to wheelchairs. Walking and transit are the only form of transportation these people have. Providing a continuous sidewalk to transit stops at University Road gives people the facilities to safely walk in the neighborhood. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) = $40,000 Construction (CN) = $200,000 Total Estimated Project Cost = $240,000 8. Sullivan -Wellesley Intersection Improvement Project RcA17 E:K'a'6.'Ao. A 0r sem SULFA VAN VYELLESLY INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT'.' �.-...-mow. a... .. INOU�I 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Project Description: A traffic signal or a multilane roundabout is needed at the intersection in order to provide safe and efficient traffic movement. Currently, during certain times of the day, traffic volumes at the Sullivan -Wellesley intersection exceed the capacity of the all -way stop -controlled intersection. Spokane County is moving forward with its Bigelow Gulch Road project which is scheduled to con- nect to Wellesley at Sullivan in 2019. When that occurs, the Sullivan Road intersection will not be able to accommodate the add- ed traffic and motorists will experience excessive delay and congestion. Benefits of the Project: 1) Reduces delay and efficiently moves traffic along the Sullivan & Wellesley corridors 2) Reduces serious, high speed crashes 3) Allows for the added traffic volumes expected with the future connection of Bigelow Gulch Road Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) = $198,000 Right of Way (RW) = $120,000 Construction (CN) = $1,052,000 Total Estimated Project Cost = $1,360,000 9. Sprague -Sullivan to Corbin Preservation Valley Sprague - Sullivan to Corbin Preservation Project (;- N., • •y 117 '. 1• + 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Project Description: Sprague Road between Sullivan and Corbin was identified in the City's Pavement Preservation Analysis Report indicates that this section of Sprague needs a 3 inch hot mix asphalt overlay. Building this project in 2018 will extend the life and serviceability of Sprague Road. This project will also evaluate sidewalk, sidewalk corner ramps, and stormwater facilities and make upgrades and replacements as required. Benefits of Project: Sprague Road is the 1-90 Business Route through the City and provides access to services, commercial retail and office space, and access to high, medium, and low density residential development. Sprague allows good east and west movement of people and goods and is a vital link in providing economic vitality along one of the City's major arterials. Bus Service runs in both directions at a frequency of 15 minutes during most of the day and evening. This project is a good use of the City's money in that it provides an extended service life to a very important piece of the City's transportation infrastructure. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) = $265,000 Construction (CN) = $1,502,000 Total Estimated Project Cost = $1,767,000 10. Barker Rd/BNSF Grade Separator KEY DESIGN FEATURES: • Barker Rd orarpaes et BNSF and Trent Ave • Sidewalks and bicyele lanes en Barker Rd - Interchange rearms between Barker Rd and Trent Ave .. Closure of Wetiesley Ave bridge over Trent Aar and BNSF • Closure of Rare Rd/BNSF at•grade crue■ng to the wit . ---ter ii dRAN4E DR Spokane �,.sVa1ky. RAIL UNE LEGEND - Existing mainllile Future mala ne Future siding GENERAL LEGEND Future bridge Future roadway Future retaining wal 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Project Description: The Project builds an interchange for Barker Road over the BNSF tracks, adds on- and off -ramps from Barker Road to Trent Avenue (SR -290), incorporates a realignment of Wellesley Ave, and provides safe passage for bikes and pedestrians across both the BNSF rail line and SR -290. Benefits of Project: Benefits of the Barker Road/BNSF Grade Separation Project : • Overall project benefit -cost ratio is 5.1 using a 3% discount rate, • Decrease transportation costs and improve long-term efficiency, reliability, and costs in the movement of workers and goods, • Enhance the access and reliability to close to 600 acres of prime, buildable industrial -zoned , • Generates approximately $2 billion in state economic output, including 9,800 new jobs (3,300 of those in Spokane Valley) and new general fund taxes ($12.3 million for City and $50.8 million for State), • Eliminates the growing risk of conflict between roadway users and trains by separating uses, would eliminates train -vehicle con- flicts, removes automobile delays, and improve the LOS for the intersection from "F" to "A", and • The addition of bike and ADA compliant pedestrian access on the overpass encourages alternative modes of transportation to nearby businesses, residences and schools. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) = $2,473,000 Right of Way (RW) = $2,418,000 Construction (CN) = $31,144,000 Total Cost =$36,035,000 11. Park Rd #2—Broadway to Indiana (RW/CN) Spokane �� Valley Park Rd #2 -Broadway to Indiana (RWICN) Project Description: This project will reconstruct the existing minor arterial to a three lane urban section. This project will also include curb, gutter, sidewalks and bike lanes. New stormwater facilities will be included in the project to capture and treat stormwater. The project also includes American's with Disabilities Act (ADA) ramps at the intersection corners to comply with the requirements outlined in Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act. A right-of-way phase is planned for in 2017 in order to show the funding agencies that the City fully intends to pursue completing this project. The initial funding for this project for Preliminary Engineering was begun in June, 2009. Benefits of Project: The project will provide needed safety and capacity improvements to accommodate the anticipated increase in traffic between Trent (SR -290) and Broadway Ave. The traffic volume on this section of Park Road is anticipated to increase from the existing 7,200 vehicles per day to approximately 21,000 vehicles per day in 2040 according to the most recent SRTC regional traffic model. Also, Park Road is an 1-90 crossing that has adequate width to meet bike and pedestrian standards. As the bike system develops in the City, the Park Road interstate crossing and eventual Bridging the Valley BNSF Railroad and Trent Ave (SR -290) crossing, will make Park Road a more attractive bike way. Park Road bike lanes will access the Millwood Trail to the north and Sprague and Appleway Trail on the south. Project Cost Estimate: Right of Way (RW) = $150,000 Construction (CN) = $2,877,000 Total Estimated Project Cost = $3,027,000 Spokane Val ley 12. Pines (SR27)/BNSF Grade Seperation Project KEY DESIGN FEATURES: - Pines Rd underpass of BNSF - Lowering of Trent AvelPines Rd intersection and lane capacity addition - Sidewalks and bicycle lanes on Pines Rd - Closure of University Rd!BNSF at -grade crossing to the west GENERAL LEGEND — Future bridge Future roadway Future retaining wall , RAIL LINE LEGEND Existing mainline Existing siding Future mainline r • Future siding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Project Description: Proposed solutions for the Pines Road/BNSF Railway part of the project include: • Grade -separation so that Pines Road passes under the BNSF railway • Add sidewalks and bicycle lanes to the Pines Road underpass • Lower the Pines Road/Trent Avenue (SR 290) intersection and add lane capacity • Close the University Road/BNSF at -grade crossing Benefits of the Project: • Overall project benefit -cost ratio is 5.1 using a 3% discount rate, • Decrease transportation costs and improve long-term efficiency, reliability, and costs in the movement of workers and goods, • Enhance the access and reliability to close to 600 acres of prime, buildable industrial -zoned and 170 acres of mixed-use and commercially -zoned land, • Generate approximately $1.2 billion in state economic output, including 8,700 new jobs (4,300 of those in Spokane Val- ley) and new general fund taxes ($8.2 million for City and $101.9 million for State), • Eliminates the growing risk of conflict between roadway users and trains by separating uses, would eliminate train -vehicle con- flicts, remove automobile delays, and improve the LOS for the intersection from "E" to "A", and • The addition of bike and ADA compliant pedestrian access on the overpass encourages alternative modes of transportation to nearby businesses, residences and schools. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering Right of Way & Construction Construction (CN) Total Estimated Project Cost = $1,200,000 = $3,000,000 = $15,565,000 = $19,769,000 13. Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvements Spokan``' _ Va11ey lipplewa y Ave Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvements 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Project Description: Barker/Sprague intersection is a unsignalized 4 -way stop controlled intersection. Barker Road accesses large tracts of undevel- oped residential land. Now, after several years of slow growth during the sluggish economy the area is beginning to see strong increases in building activity. As traffic volumes increase due to development, traffic analysis indicates that a roundabout or traffic signal will be needed at this intersection in the near future. In 2018, during the design phase and during a public process a preferred solution of either a roundabout or traffic signal will be built. Benefits of Project: The Barker/Sprague intersection improvements project will install a traffic control device that will accommodate future growth for many years to come. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) Right of Way (RW) Construction (CN) Total Estimated Project Cost = $39,000 = $12,000 = $422,000 = $474,000 This cost for this project will be a combination of City and Developer funds. 14. Appleway Shared Use Path - Pines to Evergreen sj orala:\ - 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Project Description: The City's goal is to complete the Appleway Trail across the City from Balfour Park east to Liberty Lake. The length of Trail, when complete will be about 6 miles. This project continues the Trail another mile to the East from Pines to Evergreen. The Trail will be a 12' hot mix asphalt path. The Appleway Trail project will be landscaped including trees and an irrigation system. The trail will include lighting, benches, architectural features and stormwater facilities. Where the trail crosses the highway at Pines, a High intensity Activated crossWalK (HAWK) traffic signal is proposed. The purpose of a HAWK is to stop vehicles to allow pedestrians to cross the roadway and then permit drivers to proceed as soon as the pedes- trians have passed. At Evergreen Road where the trail crosses, a Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacon (RRFB) is proposed. Including RRFBs traffic control devices increases driver alertness for pedestrians. Benefits of Project: The trail accesses services such as banking, postal and government services, the City police department, retail services such as drug stores, supermarkets, office supply stores, and restaurants. In addition, the trail provides access to multifamily housing and single family housing along the corridor. Employees now have a safe choice to walk and bike to access jobs. The Trail provides facilities for healthy lifestyles giving people the opportunity to walk and ride bikes in a safe urban environment. Project Cost Estimate: Only the construction phase for this project remains. The estimated construction cost is $1,926,000. 16 Coleman Road Sidewalk, 4th to 2nd Avenue ale' Coleman Sidewalk Project 4th to 2nd Avenue Existing Transit Stops Eagle Peak School, Old Pratt Elementary 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Project Description: The Coleman Sidewalk project will fill a gap in the sidewalk system from the Eagle Peak School to transit facilities on Appleway Boulevard and Sprague Avenue. Eagle Peak School is a special needs school staffed by over 30 professionals serving approximate- ly 100 students. This project will install about 430 lineal feet of sidewalk, curbing, and ADA compliant sidewalk ramps between 4th and 2nd Avenues along Coleman Road. Installing 430 lineal feet to fill this gap will provide more than 1,350 lineal feet of continuous sidewalk from the Eagle Peak School to permanent transit stops on Appleway Boulevard and Sprague Avenue. Benefits of Project: The absence of a safe accessible route discourages many students from non -vehicle transportation alternatives. Wheelchair bound residents in particular must travel along the edge of the roadway which increases potential vehicle -pedestrian conflicts. The transportation plan identifies sidewalk improvements for increased accessibility and installing sidewalks on streets that do not currently have any are goals of the plan. Eagle Peak School provides services to high-risk children with autism, behavior disorders, learning disabilities, and developmental delays. The staff has four mental health therapists and is a licensed mental health facility. Many of students attending Eagle Peak School use transit at Appleway and Sprague Avenue to get back and forth to school. Providing continuous sidewalks to perma- nent stops allows safe access to transit services. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) Construction (CN) Total Estimated Project Cost = $25,000 =$145,000 =$170,000 17. Argonne Rd Concrete Pavement: I-90 to Montgomery CITY kane Valley rgonne Rd Concrete Pavement, -90 to Mont• ome North 2017 2018 2019 2020 1 2021 N 2022 Project Description: Argonne Road from Indiana to Montgomery Avenues is about a 1/4 mile (1400'), 7 -lane asphalt concrete pavement that has ade- quate capacity for the traffic that is there today and expected traffic that will use the facility over the next 20 years. But the road is quickly failing and has gone past the point where pavement preservation is an option. A full reconstruction is required. The solution is to fully reconstruct this roadway by rebuilding the base and constructing a thick structural reinforced Portland ce- ment concrete pavement surface. In addition, all pedestrian sidewalks and wheelchair ramps will be upgraded to meet ADA re- quirements. Benefits of Project: The City of Spokane Valley's Pavement Management Analysis Report (PMAR) allows staff to be good stewards by providing up-to- date roadway condition information when selecting projects. The PMAR has identified Argonne Road as a reconstruct. With the high amount of traffic on this street and the high maintenance dollars being spent to maintain this roadway it makes sense to invest in reconstructing this roadway using concrete rather than continuing to spend scarce resources trying to preserve it. Pav- ing this street with concrete will provide a long design life. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) = $512,000 Construction (CN) = $3,211,000 Total Estimated Project Cost = $3,723,000 18 Appleway Trail - Evergreen to Sullivan Spakan'� ey�`�` Valley I Appleway Trail - Evergreen to Sullivan fe rr 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Project Description: The City's goal is to complete the Appleway Trail across the City from Balfour Park east to Liberty Lake. The length of Trail, when complete will be about 6 miles. This project continues the Trail another mile to the East from Evergreen to Sullivan Road. The Trail will be a 12' hot mix asphalt path. The Appleway Trail project will be landscaped that will include trees and an irrigation sys- tem. The trail will include lighting, benches, architectural features and stormwater facilities. Benefits of Project: The trail accesses services such as health care, banking, postal and government services, retail services such as drug stores, super- markets, office supply stores, and restaurants. In addition, the trail provides access to multifamily housing and single family hous- ing along the corridor. Employers such as the Numerica Corporate Offices, Monaco Enterprises, H & H Molds, and various retail services will allow walkers and bikers to access jobs. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) Construction (CN) Total Estimated Project Cost 1 = $164,000 =$1,535,000 =$1,699,000 19. Citywide Sidewalk Infill Project 1 r - u SjOkan' a Valley SPRAGUEAV Railroad • • • • Centennial Trail i School © Library em Transit Location • Trallhead Legend Pedestrian Network - Prcesed Sid e•.vall._ - Eaisiiry Shared Use Path Pr[ii:csed Shared Use Pa - Ped/Bike Bridge Proposed PedJBlke Bridge 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Project Description: This project will continue the City's effort to fill in sidewalk gaps and improve transit access at selected locations throughout the City. The project segments will focus on improvements within the walking radius of schools, high density housing, commercial districts and transit facilities. Benefits of Project: The project would enhance non -motorized transportation with the goal of increasing transit ridership, walking and biking trips, while reducing the need to drive. Sidewalks improve the accessibility of services, public facilities, and jobs. The project expands the choices for non -motorized travel between schools, recreation, commercial districts and residential areas. This is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan to develop a balanced, integrated, multi -modal transportation system, which serves the existing and future needs of the area and provides convenient choice among modes for trips into and out of Spokane Valley: for work, school, shopping, personal business, and recreational purposes. Project Cost Estimate: Several funding sources are available for sidewalk projects. The City will pursue grants as they become available. The City match for these type of projects are from 0-20%. 20. Evergreen Resurfacing- Mission Connector to Indiana Evergreen Resurfacing - Miission Connector to Indiana Mission Ave 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Project Description: This preservation project will resurface and strengthen the existing pavement by grinding the existing surface down below the existing ruts and cracks and apply new asphalt overlay to the surface. This project provides a sealed road surface and reestablish- es roadway slopes for good drainage. This project will improve bicycle facilities on Evergreen Road over 1-90. There are bike lanes through this section of Evergreen Road but the bike lanes start and stop at the various ramp terminals and turning pockets. One of the desires for this project is to provide positive guidance for bicyclists both from the standpoint of the bike user for better wayfaring and to make it clear to the motorists to expect bicyclists and to give them the right-of-way required to negotiate such a high-speed, large roadway. Benefits of Project: This project was identified in the City's 2014 Pavement Management Analysis Report as needing a thin to moderate overlay. Streets requiring minimal treatment at the right time are selected as a priority for preservation for they provide the greatest cost benefit to the City—that is the greatest increase in life per rehabilitation dollar spent. This project benefits the City by using our limited dollars to preserve a key roadway that provides the greatest benefit for the least cost. Updating Bike Facilities over the Evergreen IC will provide positive guidance for motorists and bicyclists over 1-90. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) = $66,000 Construction (CN) = $591,000 Total Project Cost =$656,000 21. Sullivan - Trent (SR -290) to Wellesley Corridor Lighting Trent (SR -290) to Wellesley Corridor Lighting 4 Trent (SR -290) [ 2017 Project Description: 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 This project installs street lights along Sullivan Road beginning at Trent (SR -290) north to Wellesley Avenue. This project was iden- tified in the recently completed North Sullivan Corridor Study that saw increased night time crashes through this section of Sulli- van Road. Street lights have been shown to reduce nighttime crashes anywhere from 12-30%. Benefits of Project: By adding streetlights, this project will reduce the number of nighttime crashes along Sullivan Road between Trent and Wellesley Avenue. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) = $90,000 Right of Way (RW = $50,000 Construction (CN) = $600,000 Total Estimated Project Cost = $740,000 22. Appleway Trail - University to Balfour Park SSpokan'e� Valley I 2017 1 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Project Description: The City's goal is to complete the Appleway Trail across the City from Balfour Park east to Liberty Lake. The length of Trail, when complete will be about 6 miles. This project continues the Trail another 1/2 mile from Balfour Park to University Road. The Trail will be a 12' hot mix asphalt path. The Appleway Trail project will be landscaped that and include trees and an irrigation system. The trail will include lighting, benches, architectural features and stormwater facilities. The Appleway Trail from University to Balfour Park connects the University City Mall, Balfour Park, and the City's future City Hall to the Appleway Trailhead at University. Benefits of the Project: This project is probably one of the most important components of the entire Appleway Trail project in that it connects walkers and bikers to shopping, a park, municipal government, and possibly a County/City library. Also, this portion of the trail would con- nect people to the Spokane Transit Authority's Transit Center, giving people the option to use the bus to work, shop, play, and conduct their business here in Spokane Valley. The Trail provides facilities for healthy lifestyles giving people the opportunity to walk and ride bikes in a safe urban environment. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) =$110,000 Right of Way (RW) =$120,000 Construction (CN) =$520,000 Total Estimated Project Cost =$750,000 24. Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan Concrete Intersection (CN only) Spokane �� illey 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Project Description: This project will reconstruct the intersections of Broadway Avenue at Argonne and Mullan Roads with a reinforced Portland ce- ment concrete pavement and provide ADA upgrades as necessary. Benefits of Project: The existing intersection is experiencing severe rutting, raveling and longitudinal cracking. Significant truck traffic continues to destroy the pavement. Preservation of the existing pavement is not an option in that the existing pavement section does not have the structural integrity to support the heavy turning trucks. To reconstruct this intersection using PCC Pavement at a de- signed depth with adequate base to support the type of traffic using it will many years of service This is the most cost effective solution and the least expensive for the taxpayer. Project Cost Estimate: This project has been designed and right-of-way is being purchased in 2016. The construction cost for this project is estimated to be $1,703,000. 25. Mission Ave -Flora Rd to Barker Rd e Valley Mission Ave- Flora to Barker Road E-lull=5 len-Aire-.. F z • v- Boa ,e J - Greenac•res�� — - N E-8raadway A've , 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Project Description: Mission Ave from Flora Road to Barker Road will be constructed to a 2 -lane urban section with bike lanes in each direction. Mission is a minor arterial that connects the major commercial districts along Sullivan and Indiana to the North Greenacres Neighborhood and Liberty Lake. The route currently carries approximately 2,700 vehicles per day, but this is expected to significantly increase to a 20 -year projected ADT of 11,400. Benefits of Project: The project will accommodate the rapidly growing neighborhoods surrounding the project. Greenacres Park has recently been built on the south end of Long Road and a new elementary school is proposed for the SW corner of the intersection of Mission and Long. The school and the park will generate significant pedestrian traffic from the surrounding neighborhood along Mission Ave. The pro- ject also improves access to two trailheads for the Centennial Trail along the Spokane River at the north end of Flora Road and the west end of Old Mission Ave. Project Cost Estimate: The design and right-of-way is being completed for this project in 2016. The estimated construction cost for this project is $3,969,000. 26. Broadway Improvement Project -Flora to Barker Flora Rd Broadway Improvement Project - Flora to Barker Barker Rd 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Project Description: The Broadway Improvement Project between Flora and Barker Road will connect Broadway between Flora and Barker Roads and improves Broadway Avenue to a 3 -lane urban section with bike lanes, curb, gutter, sidewalks and swales. Benefits of Project: The project will provide access to large vacant parcels that have limited access because the current Broadway Avenue does not go through from Flora to Barker. Also, this project will allow those traveling east on Broadway to Barker and the interstate unre- stricted travel east of the Flora and Broadway roundabout. This project will give drivers, bikers and walkers direct access to Bark- er Road. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) = $543,000 Right of Way (RW) = $500,000 Construction (CN) = $4,163,000 Total Estimate Project Cost = $5,206,000 27. Evergreen & Broadway ITS Note: Blue Line indicates the extent of Communication and Traffic Signal Corridor that will be completed with this project. AMILC�S��3F�h_irc' 2019 2020 Project Description: This project installs an ITS (Intelligent Transportation System) communication system to improve traffic flow, reduce congestion, and reduce emissions on Evergreen from Sprague to 16th Avenue and along Broadway from Pines Road (SR -27) to Evergreen Road. Benefits of the Project: The Project will reduce travel time and stops along Evergreen and Broadway. In addition, the project reduces emissions along corridors keeping the air clean in Spokane Valley. The project increases economic development by reducing delays to freight trav- el, reduces fuel and maintenance costs for freight carriers and the public, reduces the operational cost for traffic signal manage- ment, and improves the monitoring of the traffic signal system to enhance efficiency (emergency situations and operations). Project Cost Estimate Preliminary Engineering = $206,000 Right of Way & Construction = $80,000 Construction (CN) = $1,584,000 Total Estimated Project Cost = $1,870,000 29. Barker Road- Euclid to Trent Valley Barker Rd - Euclid to 0.1 mi S of Trent Ave (SR -290) L 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Project Description: Barker Road from the Spokane River to Euclid intersection will be widened to a 5 -lane roadway with 2 lanes in each direction and a middle turn lane, and will include bike lanes, sidewalks and swales. Benefits of Project: Barker Road accesses the heart of the city's industrial area and traffic is expected to grow by 38% by year 2040. Widening the road anticipates future growth and will be in place as the industrial land is developed. New bike lanes and sidewalks will extend access to Trent Ave (SR -290) and neighborhoods on the north side of the highway and east to Otis Orchards along Wellesley Avenue. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) = $471,000 Right of Way (RW) = $100,000 Construction (CN) = $3,613,000 Total Estimated Project Cost = $4,184,000 30. Barker Rd Improvement Project-Appleway to I-90 Barker Rd imp Project - Appleway to 1-90 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Project Description: Barker Road will be widened to a 5 -lane urban arterial section from Appleway to the Barker Road 1-90 interchange (IC). The east leg of Broadway Avenue will be realigned to match Broadway on the west side of Barker Road. The new intersection will either be a 2 -lane roundabout or traffic signal. Barker Road will include new bike lanes, sidewalks, and swales. Benefits of the Project: Barker Road between Appleway and the Barker Road 1-90 IC is an important arterial link. Appleway is the east end of the 1-90 Business Loop and accesses the heart of the commercial district in the City of Spokane Valley. New sidewalks and bike lanes will connect to the Appleway Trail on the south and provide a link over 1-90 to the Centennial Trail along the Spokane River. This area is ripe for development and redevelopment and this upgrade will provide good transportation facilities to facilitate that growth. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) = $382,000 Right of Way (RW) = $1,146,000 Construction (CN) = $2,397,000 Total Estimated Project Cost = $3,629,000 31. Barker Rd Improvements -South City Limits to Appleway Barker Rd Imp, S City Limits to Appleway 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Project Description: The Barker Road Improvement project from the South City Limit to Appleway is about 0.80 miles long and will be widened to a 3 - lane urban section that will include bike lanes, curbs, sidewalks, and swales. Barker Road traffic is steadily increasing due to significant housing development in both the City and the County. The existing road was constructed when this section of the City was primarily rural and Barker Road was a farm to market road. In most places the road is one lane in each direction, narrow, with gravel shoulders. The drainage facilities are at a minimum with few swales. Crash rates are slowly increasing and as the area becomes more developed, crashes are expected to increase. Benefits of Project: This project will upgrade the existing road to urban standards. A new center turn lane will provide left turn refuge out of the mainline traffic. New bike and pedestrian facilities will be installed to give residences more options in transportation. Rebuilding and widening the road is expected to reduce crash rates. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) = $326,000 Right of Way (RW) = $25,000 Construction (CN) =$2,502,000 Total Estimated Project Cost =$2,854,000 33. Pines I-90 IC, City Intersection Improvement 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Project Description: The Indiana & Pines (SR -27) Traffic Signal project installs a new double left turn lane for eastbound left turning traffic. The left turn bays will extend east beyond the 1-90 eastbound offramp. Two traffic signals will be updated to include the added lane. In addition, new lanes will be added to the Mission and Pines intersection for east and westbound traffic. Benefits of Project: Adding new lanes and upgrading the traffic signals along Pines near the 1-90 Pines Road interchange will reduce delay and provide added capacity will reduce the bottleneck that is beginning to develop at this key interchange in the City. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) = $250,000 Right-of-way (RW) = $300,000 Construction (CN) =$1,300,000 Total Project Cost =$1,850,000 34. Mirabeau/Mansfield Intersection Improvements Mirabeau Parkway Mirabeau/Mansfield Intersection Improvements Project 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Project Description: The Mirabeau Pkwy & Mansfield Traffic Signal project installs a new traffic signal at the intersection. New commercial develop- ment along Mirabeau Pkwy and potential development along Mansfield Avenue will increase traffic volumes at the intersection. Benefits of Project: Installing a new traffic signal at Mirabeau Pkwy & Mansfield Avenue will increase the level -of -service at the intersection from LOS "F" to "LOS" B during the AM & PM Peak Hour. A failing LOS places the burden of mitigating this condition on new development which is oftentimes cost prohibitive to new development. Installing a traffic signal at this location will encourage business to lo- cate and develop along Mirabeau Pkwy and Mansfield Avenue. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) = $110,000 Right -of -Way (RW) =$100,000 Construction (CN) =$560,000 Total Project Cost =$770,000 35. Argonne Rd & I-90 IC Bridge Widening WIDEN BRIDGE TO 3 -LANES, ARGONNE WSDOT EXIT NUTABER 287 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Project Description: Argonne Road north and south of the interchange is three lanes, except over the interstate, where Argonne Road travels over a 2 - lane bridge. This creates a bottleneck and significantly adds delay and congestion in the peak travel hours. The City recently completed the University Overpass Report that recommends adding a third lane and a sidewalk to the bridge. According to the report, adding an additional lane would significantly reduce delay through the 2040 design year. This project will add another 12 foot travel lane, a 6 foot wide shoulder and a 10 foot sidewalk to the Argonne Road bridge over I- 90. Benefits of Project: The project relieves corridor congestion and significantly reduces travel time. By 2040, according to traffic modeling, if no lane were added, the time to drive south from Trent to Mission would take about 7 minutes. By adding another lane to the bridge the same trip would take just under 2 minutes. The project supports future plans for STA's "Fly -over" Stop at Argonne Interchange when they implement the High Performance Transit Network (HPTN). Widening the bridge and adding a new 10 foot sidewalk and widened shoulder provides improved pedestrian facilities per the City's Comprehensive Plan. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) = $900,000 Construction (CN) =$5,760,000 Total estimated project cost =$6,660,000 36. Barker Rd Improvement- Spokane River to Euclid pokan' ems``' Valley Barker - Spokane River to Euclid 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Project Description: Barker Road from the Spokane River to Euclid intersection will be widened to a 5 -lane roadway with 2 lanes in each direction and a middle turn lane, and will include bike lanes, sidewalks and swales. Benefits of Project: Barker Road accesses the heart of the city's industrial area and traffic is expected to grow by 38% by year 2040. Widening the road anticipates future growth and will be in place as the industrial land is developed. Adding bike lanes and sidewalks will ex- tend access to the Centennial Trail along the Spokane River, STA bus stop Route 98, and to various commercial businesses. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) = $378,000 Right of Way (RW) = $25,000 Construction (CN) = $2,899,000 Total Project Cost =$3,302,000 City of Spokane Valley 2017 - 2022 Six Year TIP =el-lesleey Sullivan -Wellesley Intersection Improvement ent Project SullivanMENEM" Warm 1111 - Trent to Wellesley Corridor Lighting Sullivan/Euclid Concrete Intersection Barker Roatl Euclitl toirent Barker Road Spokane River to Euclid iral _�� Argonne Roatlad & 1-90-90 j11 I/ IC Bridge Widening IN\I,, Mirabeau/Mansfield Intersection Improvements Argonne Road Concrete 1-90 to Montgomery Pines 1-901C City Intersection Improvement Project Broadway/ Argonne S. Mullan Concrete Intersections ■ EMaralPill Barker Road Improvement Project Appleway to I-90 mr�� Sprague Ave n 1r�� 7 Sullivan to Corbin Paement Preservatio � _�■L��lI'i- Appleway Trail University to Balfour Park F'y ••__ ■ 0 ••__ .JiJt•fltw�� • •P M- -P.rrrrrrrrrrt�I.___ _71E•LCole an Roatl Sidewalkl_M =lb& 4th to 2nd Ave I_� Appleway Park to Dishman-Mica Preservation MUM Appleway Shared Use Path Pines to Evergreen Appleway Trail Evergreen to Sullivan Barker Road —7 I �.� i SOUR, CBy Limits to Appleway uIIII ii ■.�.�=_.�■��_-__• SII ui . II 9m Ave Sidewalk• �� % • •0 Raymond to University - ry� �'11111� ' --- -� ;IIiI.!4? —�`,==kt/A r.=='wee . 1� 11 ___IS inlillinifer �_ �lisc - Ill - � ��_71Alial ��1Yr��liu�.a ttc 1111 1 x.41 or 1 purr l r *Wane Walley May 19th, 2016 Legend Project Year 2017 2020 2018 2019 2021 2022 Projects Not Shown: Sidewalk Infill Project 2017 -2022 Street Preservation Projects CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 28, 2016 Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ information ❑ admin. report Department Director Approval: ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Bid Award: McDonald Road Project: Mission Avenue to 16th Avenue CIP# 0221 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 3.35.10 — Contract Authority PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Information RCA on HSIP (Highway Safety Improvement Program) call for projects on June 10, 2014; Admin. Report on HSIP projects on June 24, 2014; Information RCA on City Safety Program Call for projects on January 20, 2015; HSIP portion of project was added to adopted 2015 TIP on March 24, 2015; Information RCA on upcoming TIB projects on June 30, 2015; Admin. Report on TIB call for projects on July 7, 2015; Motion approval to allow the city manager to apply for TIB grants on July 14, 2015; Council approved adding the TIB portion of this project to the Amended 2016 TIP on February 9, 2016, Resolution No.16-005; Info RCA on June 7, 2016. BACKGROUND: The McDonald Road Diet project will place a two-inch asphalt overlay on McDonald Road between Mission Avenue and 8th Avenue. The pedestrian ramps will also be updated and storm water facilities will be improved. McDonald will be restriped from Mission Avenue to 16th Avenue and traffic signal modifications will be completed. The project is funded by a HSIP grant, TIB grant and city funds. Public works staff designed the project and received permission from the funding agencies to advertise for bids. Bids were advertised on May 27 and were to be opened on June 17, 2016. OPTIONS: Award the contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder or take other appropriate action. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to award the McDonald Road Diet Project #0221 to Inland Asphalt in the amount of $1,728,000.00 and authorize the Acting City Manager to finalize and execute the construction contract. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The McDonald Road Diet Project budget is $2,524,104. It is funded with a $608,900 federal HSIP grant, a $1,237,630 TIB grant, local matches of $7,100 (Fund 301 REET), $292,380 in Street Preservation funds (Fund 311) and $378,094 in Stormwater funds (Fund 402). There are sufficient funds to cover this project. STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Worley, PE — Capital Improvement Program Manager Eric Guth, PE — Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: Bid Tabulation, Exhibit BID TABULATION McDonald Rd Diet Project CIP No. 0221- Bid Opening Date 06/17/2016 Spokane` Val ley WSDOT # Item # Units Quantity Engineers Estimate Inland Asphalt Halme Construction Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Schad A • TIB Grant - Overlay from Mission to 8th Ave 0002 100 MOBILIZATION L.S. 1 $140,000.00 5140,000.00 597,380.00 597,380.00 $176,000.00 5176,000.00 101 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING L.5. 1 510,000.00 510,000.00 527,000.00 527,000.00 518,000.00 $18,000.00 7736 102 SPCC PLAN L.S. 1 $500.00 5500,00 $650.00 $650.00 $520.00 $520.00 103 EROSION CONTROL L.S. 1 520,000.00 520,000.00 58,580.00 58,580.00 54,500.00 54,500.00 6971 104 PROJECT TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL L.S. 1 5140,000.00 5140,000.00 5112,000.00 5112,000.00 535,000.00 535,000.00 6993 105 PORTABLE CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN HR. 672 53.00 52,016.00 53.75 52,520,00 $4.15 52,788.80 6980 106 FLAGGERS HR, 170 560.00 510,200.00 549.00 $8,330.00 551,00 58,670.00 7728 107 MINOR CHANGE CALC. L 510,000.00 510,000.00 510,000.00 510,000.00 510,000.00 510,000.00 108 SAWCUT ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT LF -IN 2290 50.50 51,145.00 50.30 5687.00 50.30 5687.00 0120 109 REMOVE ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT S.Y. 1170 54.00 54,680.00 $18.00 521,060.00 515.00 $17,550.00 0110 110 REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE CURB L.F. 2150 510.00 521,500.00 $6.00 512,900.00 $5.00 510,750.00 111 REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE CUR8 WALL L.F. 170 $11.00 $1,870.00 $13.80 52,346.00 53.60 5612.00 0100 112 REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK / DRIVEWAY APPROACH S.Y. 1100 512.00 $13,200.00 $22.00 524,200.00 57.60 58,360.00 113 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE, 2IN. DEPTH S.Y. 100 560.00 56,000.00 54.00 $400.00 $11.45 51,145.00 114 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE, 4 IN. DEPTH 5.Y. 1600 520.00 532,000.00 $7.50 512,000.00 512.60 520,160.00 115 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE, 6 IN. DEPTH 5.Y. 1150 540.00 $46,000.00 $10.40 $11,960.00 513,90 515,985.00 5711 116 PLANING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT, 2 IN. DEPTH S.Y. 6350 $3.00 519,050.00 52.35 514,922.50 $1.40 $8,890.00 117 PLANING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT, TAPER GRIND S.Y. 13000 53.00 539,000.00 52.10 527,300.00 52.60 533,800.00 118 PLANING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT, 3/8 IN. DEPTH S.Y. 18500 51.00 $18,500.00 50.90 516,650.00 50.67 512,395.00 119 HMA CL. 1/2" PG 70-280,17 FT. DEPTH S.Y. 38000 810,00 5380,000.00 $8.30 5315,400.00 59.60 5364,800.00 120 HMA Cl.. 1/2" PG 70-28 0.33 FT. DEPTH S.Y. 1000 550.00 550,000.00 518.65 518,650.00 521.60 521,600.00 121 HMA CL. 1/2' PG 70-280,50 FT. DEPTH, PATCH 5.Y. 150 580.00 512,000.00 558.00 58,700.00 $66.00 59,900.00 122 JOINT ADHESIVE L.F. 9000 51.00 59,000.00 50.80 57,200.00 51.40 512,600.00 5830 123 JOB MIX COMPLIANCE PRICE ADJUSTMENT CALC 1 $1.00 51.00 $1.00 $1.00 51.00 51.00 5835 124 COMPACTION PRICE ADJUSTMENT CALC 1 51.00 $1.00 51.00 $1.00 $1.00 51.00 125 CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 EACH 53 51,200.00 563,600.00 51,925.00 5102,025.00 $1,300.00 568,900.00 126 SPILL CONTROL SEPARATOR EACH 52 5300.00 515,600.00 $188.00 59,776.00 5135.00 57,020.00 127 PRECAST CONCRETE DRYWELL TYPE A WITH SOLID COVER EACH 1 52,000.00 $2,000.00 $3,200.00 53,200.00 53,600.00 $3,600.00 128 PRECAST CONCA£TE DRYWELL TYPE El WITH SOLID COVER EACH 2 $3,000.00 56,000.00 $4,825.00 59,650.00 $4,100.00 58,200.00 6701 129 CEMENT CONCRETE TRAFFIC CURB L.F. 1900 $20.00 538,000,00 817.50 $33,250.00 521.90 541,610.00 6700 130 CEMENT CONCRETE TRAFFIC CURB AND GUTTER L.F. 280 521.00 55,880.00 $25.70 $7,196.00 530.00 $8,400.00 6707 131 CEMENT CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN CURB L.F. 1350 518.00 $24,300.00 514.90 $20,115.00 $18.30 $24,705,00 132 CEMENT CONCRETE CURB WALL L. F, 170 555,00 59,350.00 527.20 54,624.00 535.00 55,950.00 7055 133 CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK S.Y. 260 530.00 57,800.00 537.00 59,620.00 $38.00 59,880.00 7059 134 CEMENT CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APPROACH S.Y. 4 5100.00 5400.00 543.00 5172.00 $42.00 5168.00 7058 135 CEMENT CONCRETE CURB RAMP TYPE SINGLE DIRECTION EACH 8 51,000.00 $8,000.00 5765.00 $6,120.00 5770.00 56,160.00 7058 136 CEMENT CONCRETE CURB RAMP TYPE PARALLEL A EACH 28 $1,200.00 $33,600.00 5990.00 527,720.00 51,000.00 528,000.00 137 CEMENT CONCRETE CURB RAMP TYPE CUSTOM PARALLEL A EACH 13 51,500.00 519,500.00 5760.00 59,880.00 5770.00 510,010.00 7058 138 CEMENT CONCRETE CURB RAMP TYPE PARALLEL 6 EACH 15 51,100.00 $16,500.00 5940.00 514,100.00 $950.00 514,250.00 139 CEMENT CONCRETE CURB RAMP TYPE CUSTOM PERPENDICULAR A EACH 7 51,600.00 $11,200.00 5645.00 $4,515.00 5553.00 $4,571.00 140 ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE EACH 27 5750.00 520,250.00 $400.00 510,800.00 $400.00 510,800.00 141 ADJUST EXISTING GAS VALVE EACH 7 $500.00 53,500.00 $400.00 $2,800.00 5160.00 51,120.00 McDonald Rd Diet Project CIP No. 0221 - Bid Opening Date 06/17/2016 WSDOT # Item tJ Units Quantity Engineers Estimate Inland Asphalt Halme Construction Unit Price Total Cost UnitPriceTotal Cost Unit Price Total Cost 7.045 142 ADJUST EXISTING WATER VALVE EACH 73 5450.00 532,850.00 $400.00 529,200.00 5160.00 511,680.00 7045 143 MONUMENT CASE AND COVER EACH 2 5350.00 $700.00 5430.00 5860.00 $590.00 $1,180.00 6555 144 SOD INSTALLATION 5.1. 270 520.00 $5,400.00 517.00 54,590.00 $19.00 55,130.00 145 TOPSOIL, TYPE C S.Y. 270_ 510.00 52,700.00 53.80 51,026.00 54.00 $1,080.00 146 BARK MULCH S.Y. 25 540.00 51,000.00 $8.60 $215.00 $10.00 5250.00 147 IRRIGATION SYSTEM REVISION EACH 26 5400.00 510,400,00 5860.00 $22,360.00 $950.00 524,700.00 148 FRACTURED LANDSCAPE ROCK SALVAGE S.Y. 30 520.00 $600.00 540.00 $1,200.00 514.00 5420.00 149 DELINEATOR AND CORE HOLE EACH 1 $400.00 5400.00 5106.00 5106.00 5172.00 5172.00 513,500.00 6890 150 PERMANENT SIGNING L.S. 1 510,000.00 510,000.00 58,700.00 58,700.00 513,500.00 Total Sched A - TIB G ant - Overlay from Mission to 8th Ave 51,336,193.00 51,104,657.50 51,106,170.80 Sched B - 0002 200 MOBILIZATION LS. 1 $33,000.00 $33,000.00_ 512,000.00 512,000.00 $28,000.00 528,000.00 201 TRENCH EXCAVATION SAFETY SYSTEM L.S. 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 5535.00 5535.00 $500.00 $500.00 7728 202 MINOR CHANGE CALC. LF -IN 1 7500 52,000.00 $0.50 52,000.00 53,750.00 52,000.00 $0.30 52,000.00 52,250.00 52,000.00 $0.30 52,000.00 52,250.00 203 SAWCUT ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT 204 STORMWATER PATCH REMOVAL S.Y. 1100 54.00 54,400.00 522.00 524,200.00 515.40 516,940.00 0110 205 REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE CURB L.F. 780 $10.00 57,800.00 $6.00 54,680.00 54.00 $3,120.00 206 REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE CURB WALL L.F. 55 512.00 5660.00 514.00 5770.00 $4.00 5220.00 0100 207 REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK / DRIVEWAYAPPROACH S.Y. 470 512.00 $5,640.00 522.00 510,340.00 57.60 53,572.00 0116 208 REMOVE INLET EACH 17 5300.00 55,100.00 5320.00 55,440.00 512.00 5204.00 209 ABANDON EXISTING ORYWELL EACH 5 $800.00 54,000.00 5475.00 52,375.00 5250.00 51,250.00 210 REMOVE STORM DRAIN PIPE L.F. 220 $12.00 52,540.00 521.50 54,730.00 54.50 5990.00 211 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE, 2 IN. DEPTH S.Y. 12 $60.00 $720.00 $4.00 548.00 512.00 5144.00 212 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE, 4IN. DEPTH S.Y. 640 520.00 512,800.00 57.50 54,800.00 $12.50 58,000.00 213 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE, 6 IN. DEPTH S.Y. 1100 540.00 544,000.00 510.40 511,440.00 514.00 515,400.00 214 HMA CL. I/2" PG 70-28 0.50 FT. DEPTH, PATCH S.Y. 1100 560.00 566,000.00 $58.00 563,800.00 $67.00 573,700.00 215 JOINT ADHESIVE L.F. 410 51.00 5410.00 50.80 5328.00 51.50 5615.00 5830 216 JOB MIX COMPLIANCE PRICE ADJUSTMENT CALC 1 $1.00 51.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 51.00 5835 217 COMPACTION PRICE ADJUSTMENT CALC 1 $1.00 51.00 $1.00 $1.00 51.00 51.00 3773 218 DUCTILE IRON STORM SEWER PIPE 10 IN. DIA. L.F. 580 560.00 534,800.00 565.00 $37,700.00 $45.00 526,100.00 219 CONNECTION TO EXISTING DRYWELL EACH 46 5600.00 527,600.00 51,050.00 $48,300.00 5620.00 $28,520.00 220 REPLACE EXISTING CONE EACH 33 $450.00 514,850.00 5830.00 527,390.00 $881.00 529,073.00 221 ADJUST EXISTING CATCH BASIN OR DRYWELL EACH 5 5600.00 53,000.00 5400.00 52,000.00 5400.00 52,000.00 222 TYPE 4 FRAME AND SOLID COVER EACH 38 5400.00 515,200.00 5700.00 526,600.00 5550.00 520,900.00 6701 223 CEMENT CONCRETE TRAFFIC CURB L.F. 221 $20.00 54,420.00 $17.50 53,867.50 522.00 54,862.00 6700 224 CEMENT CONCRETE TRAFFIC CURB AND GUTTER L.F. 600 521.00 512,600.00 525.70 515,420.00 $30.00 518,000.00 225 CEMENT CONCRETE CURB WALL L.F. 55 555.00 $3,025.00 527.20 51,496.00 535.00 51,925.00 7055 226 CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK S.Y. 260 530.00 57,800.00 537.00 $9,620.00 537.00 59,620.00 7059 227 CEMENT CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APPROACH 5.Y. 140 $50.00 57,000.00 543.00 56,020.00 543.00 56,020.00 6555 228 SOD INSTALLATION S.Y. 40 520.00 $800.00 517,00 5680.00 519.00 5760.00 229 TOPSOIL, TYPE C 5.Y. 40 510.00 $400.00 54.00 5160.00 54.20 5168.00 230 IRRIGATION SYSTEM REVISION EACH 8 5380.00 53,040.00 $860.00 56,880.00 $1,000.00 58,000.00 231 BARK MULCH S.Y. 8 540.00 $320.00 $8.60 568.80 57.50 560.00 Total Sched 6 - 5328,777.00 5335,940.30 5312,915.00 McDonald Rd Diet Project CIP No. 0221 - Bid Opening Date 06/17/2016 WSDOT # Item # Units Quantlty Engineers Estimate Inland Asphalt Halme Construction Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Sched C - 0002 300 MOBILIZATION L.S. 1 1 533,000.00 53,000.00 533,000.00 53,000.00 512,000.00 53,000.00 512,000.00520,000.00 53,000.00 ` 53,000,00 520,000.00 $3,000.00 7728 301 MINOR CHANGE CALC. 302 SAWCUT ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT LF -IN 1400 $0.50 5700.00 $0.30 5420.00 $0.30 5420.00 0120 303 REMOVE ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT S.Y. 150 $4.00 5600.00 518.20 52,730.00 515.50 52,325.00 0110 304 REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE CURB L.F. 340 510.00 53,400.00 55.90 52,006.00 53.00 $1,020.00 0100 305 REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK/ DRIVEWAY APPROACH S.Y. 180 512.00 52,160.00 $2.40 5432.00 57.50 51,350.00 306 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE, 4 IN. DEPTH S.Y. 220 $20.00 54,400.00 57.50 51,650.00 513.00 52,860.00 307 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE, 6 IN. DEPTH S.Y. 150 $40.00 56,000.00 510.40 51,560.00 513.00 51,950.00 308 HMA CL. 1/2" PG 70-28 0.50 FT. DEPTH, PATCH S.V. 150 580.00 512,000.00 558.00 58,700.00 566.00 59,900.00 309 HMA CL. 1/2" PG 70-28 MISCELLANEOUS AREAS S.Y. 10 5100.00 51,000.00 541.00 5410.00 548.00 5480.00 5830 310 JOB MIX COMPLIANCE PRICE ADJUSTMENT CALC 1 51.00 51.00 $1.00 $1.00 51.00 $1.00 5835 311 COMPACTION PRICE ADJUSTMENT CALC 1 $1.00 51.00 51.00 51.00 $1.00 51.00 6701 312 CEMENT CONCRETE TRAFFIC CURB L.F. 160 520.00 53,200.00 517.50 52,800.00 522.00 53,520.00 6700 313 CEMENT CONCRETE TRAFFIC CURB AND GUTTER L.F. 150 521.00 $3,150.00 525.70 53,855.00 $30.00 $4,500.00 6707 314 CEMENT CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN CURB L.F. 100 518.00 51,800.00 515.00 51,500.00 518.00 51,800.00 7055 315 CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK S.Y. 70 530.00 $2,100.00 537.00 $2,590.00 537.00 52,590.00 7058 316 CEMENT CONCRETE CURB RAMP TYPE SINGLE DIRECTION A EACH 1 51,000.00 51,000.00 5765.00 5765.00 5770.00 5770.00 7058 317 CEMENT CONCRETE CURB RAMP TYPE PARALLELA EACH 5 51,200.00 56,000.00 $990.00 54,950.00 51,000.00 55,000.00 318 CEMENT CONCRETE CURB RAMP TYPE CUSTOM PERPENDICULAR A EACH 1 51,500.00 51,500.00 $645.00 5645.00 5652.00 5652.00 6555 319 500 INSTALLATION 5.Y. 115 520.00 52,300.00 $17.00 51,955.00 519.00 52,185.00- 320 TOPSOIL, TYPE C S.Y. 115 510.00 51,150.00 53.80 5437.00 54.00 $460.00 321 BARK MULCH S.Y. 12 540.00 $480.00 58.60 5103.20 510.00 $120.00 322 IRRIGATION SYSTEM REVISION EACH 3 5380.00 51,140.00 5860.00 52,580,00 5950.00 $2,850.00 6942 323 CONDUIT PIPE 1 IN. DIA. L.F. 70 513,00 5910.00 518.00 51,260.00 512.00 $840.00 6944 324 CONDUIT PIPE 11/2 IN. DIA. L.F. 390 $15.00 55,850.00 515.40 $6,006.00 516.00 56,240.00 325 JUNCTION BOX, TYPE 2 EACH _ 8 $800.00 56,400.00 5715.00 55,720.00 5860.00 56,880.00 326 INDUCTION LOOP, TYPE 3 EACH 3 5800.00 $2,400,00 5640.00 51,920.00 5625.00 51,875.00 327 TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM MODIFICATION L.S. 1 560,000.00 560,000.00 563,000.00 563,000.00 577,000.00 577,000.00 328 REMOVING PLASTIC LINE L.F. 640 $5.00 53,200.00 53.20 52,048.00 53.00 51,920.00 6806 329 PAINT LINE L.F. 100 51.00 $100.00 50.85 585.00 54.00 5400.00 6807 330 PLASTIC LINE L.F. 37500 $1.00 537,500.00 $1.80 567,500.00 $3.00 5112,500.00 6827 331 PAINTED WIDE LANE UNE L.F. 5000 $0.50 52,500.00 $0.28 51,400.00 50.60 53,000.00 6828 332 PLASTIC WIDE LANE UNE L.F. 14220 55.04 571,100.00 $4.30 561,146.00 55.60 579,632.40 6857 333 PLASTIC CROSSWALK LINE S.F. 800 514.00 511,200.00 $9.80 57,840.00 512.50 510,000.00 6859 334 PLASTIC STOP LINE L.F. 110 518.00 51,980.00 514.70 51,617.00 525.00 52,750.00 335 GROOVED PLASTIC STOP LINE L.F. 70 520.00 $1,400.00 527.00 51,890.00 553.00 53,710.00 6833 336 PLASTIC TRAFFIC ARROW EACH 40 5225.00 59,000.00 5120.00 54,800.00 5208.00 58,320.00 6867 337 PLASTIC BICYCLE LANE SYMBOL EACH 32 5200.00 56,400.00 5190.00 56,080.00 5493.00 $15,776.00 Total Sched C - 5310,022.00 5287,402.20 5398,597.00 TOTAL (All schedules) $1,974,992.00 $1,728,000.00 51,817,682.80 DBE Confirmation from WSDOT MIN OEM 1111u. in Elmum Irmo liliuil 1 MUM u rlail NIMIN rali 1p ami MN OM INI 'II 7 u ii il gum is mum sum El ... El II II III memo em immiow iiiii ar'llEA sgli I IIIum IN alIli In BOLINMillII MI111 MISSION BROADWAY McDONALD ROAD MISSION TO 16TH HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP) PROJECT LOCATION SW BL LANE SW TWLTL CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY LANE BL SW LANE SPRAGUE 16TH AVE LANE LANE LANE "t" EA SECTION NTS SW BL LANE SW LANE LANE BL SW LANE SW IB SECTION NTS NOT TO SCALE SW NEW -{ EXISTING NEW EXISTING Spokane .Valley HSIP McDONALD ROAD FIGURE 1 VICINITY MAP DRAWN BY: RPB CHECKED BY: RJW DATE: 7/15/2014 DATE: 7/15/2014 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 28, 2016 Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ information ❑ admin. report Department Director Approval: ❑ • new business ❑ public hearing ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: MOTION CONSIDERATION: Justice Assistance Grant 2016 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: N/A BACKGROUND: The City of Spokane Valley has been allocated $25,628 as part of the 2016 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program. These funds are designed to support all components of the criminal justice system. Spokane Valley staff has relied on recommendations of the Spokane Valley Police Chief to identify proposed projects to be funded with the grant. The Police Chief and the Acting City Manager have recommended spending the funds on purchasing a three-dimensional laser scanner that is utilized to quickly scan the scene of an incident, capturing all objects and distance data, and use accompanying software to create a "fly -around" 3d representation of the scene. OPTIONS: 1.) Authorize application for the JAG grant. 2.) Request amendments to the application. 3.) Deny authorization to submit grant. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to Authorize the Acting City Manager to Apply for the Justice Assistance Grant. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: $25,628 in grants funds, no match required. Spokane County will provide the additional funding for the remaining cost of the equipment ($16,325.81 out of $41,953.81 total cost) plus additional costs for training and support equipment. The County funds are Traffic funds generated by DUI fines. STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Koudelka, Senior Administrative Analyst ATTACHMENTS: JAG Solicitation, Program Narrative, JAG Abstract Review Narrative, Budget Worksheet, Budget Narrative U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Assistar?ce OMB No. 1121-0329 Approval expires 12/3112018 The U_S_ Department cf Justice (DOJ), Office of Justice Programs (OJP) Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) is seeking applications for funding under the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program. This program furthers the Department's mission by assisting state, local, and tribal efforts to prevent or reduce crime and violence. Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program Fiscal Year (FY) 2016 Local Solicitation Applications Due: June 30, 2016 Eligibility Eligible applicants are limited to units of local government appearing on the FY 2016 JAG Allocations List. To view this list, ao to vi/ww.b'a. allacations.html. For JAG program purposes, a unit of local government is atown, township, village, parish, city, county, borough, or other general purpose political subdivision of a state; or, it may also be a federally recognized Indian tribal government that perform lav enforcement functions (as determined by the Secretary of the interior). Otherwise a unit of local government may be any law enforcement district or judicial enforcement district established under applicable state law with authority to independently establish a budget and impose taxes. In Louisiana, a unit of local government means a district attorney or parish sheriff, Deadline Applicants must register in the OJP Grants Management System (GMS) prior to submitting an application for this funding opportunity. Registration is required for ail applicants, even those previously registered in GMS. Select the "Apply Online" button associated with the solicitation title. All registrations and applications are due by due by 5:00 p.m. eastern time on June 30, 2016. For additional information, see Flow to Apply in Section D. Application and Submission Information. Contact Information For technical assistance with submitting an application, contact the Grants Management System Support Hotline at 888-549-9901, option 3 or via email at CMS .HeIoDe. k cr usdoi,goy. The GMS Support Hotline hours of operation are Monday — Friday from 6:00 a.m. to midnight eastern time, except federal holidays. Applicants that experience unforeseen GMS technical issues beyond their control that prevent them from submitting their application by the deadline must email the contact identified below within 24 hours after the application deadline and request approval to subrnit their application. Additional information an reporting technical issues is found under "Experiencing Unforeseen GMS Technical Issues" in the How to Apply section. For assistance with any other requirement of this solicitation, contact the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS) Response Center: toll-free at 1-800-851-3420; via TTY at 301-240-6310 (hearing impaired only); email grants ncirs.00v; fax to 301-240-5830; or web chat at httos:/'webcontact,ncLrs.00vincichatichat.isp. The NCJRS Response Center hours of operation are 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. eastern time, Monday through Friday. You may also contact your State Policy Advisor. Release date: May 16, 2016 EdA-2016-902D A. Program Description 4 Overview 4 Program -Specific Information 4 Goals, Objectives, and Deliverables 7 Evidence -Based Programs or Practices 7 B. Federal Award Informatton.. ............ ................ ............... .......... .... 8 Type of Award Financial Management and System of Internal Controls. 9 Budget Information 10 Cost Sharing or Matching Requirement .......... ....... .... .......... ................ 11 Pre -Agreement Cost (also known as Pre -award Cost} ........ _ 11 Prior Approval, Planning, and Reporting of Coriference/Meetingaraining Costs 11 Costs Associated with Language Assistance (if applicable) 12 C. Eligibility Information 14 Limit cn Number of Application Submissions 14 D. Application and Submission Information 14 What an Application Should Include 14 How to Apply 22 E. Application Review Information .................................................... ReviewProcess....................................................................................................................24 F. Federal Award Administration Information 25 Federal Award Notices. 25 Administrative, National Policy, and other Legal Requirements .25 General Information about Post -Federal Award Reporting Requirements 26 G. Federal Awarding Agency Contact(s) 26 H. Other Information. 26 Provide Feedback to OJP 26 Application Checklist 28 3 BJA-2016-9020 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program: FY 2016 Local Solicitation (CFDA #16.738) A. Program Description Overview The Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program (42 U.S.C, § 3751 OD is the primary provider of federal criminal justice funding to state and Iocal jurisdictions. The JAG Program provides states and units of local governments with critical funding necessary to support a range of program areas including law enforcement; prosecution and court programs; prevention and education programs; corrections and community corrections; drug treatment and enforcement; crime victims and witness Initiatives; and planning, evaluation, and technology improvement programs_ Program -Specific information JAG funds may be used for state and local initiatives, technical assistance, strategic planning, research and evaluation (including forensics), data collection, training, personnel, equipment. forensic laboratories, supplies, contractual support, and criminal justice information systems that will improve or enhance such areas as: • Law enforcement programs, • Prosecution and court programs, including indigent defense. • Prevention and education programs_ • Corrections, community corrections and reentry programs. • Drug treatment and enforcement programs. • Planning, evaluation, and technology improvement programs_ • Crime victim and witness programs (other than compensation). Additionally, 1,1A rernidrids applicants that the JAG program allows funding for broadband deployment and adoption activities as they relate to criminal justice activities. JAG Priority Areas BJA recognizes that there are significant pressures on state and local criminal justice systems. In these challenging times, shared priorities and leveraged resources can make a significant impact. In light of this, it is important to make State Administering Agencies (SARs) and local JAG recipients aware of several areas of priority that may be of help in maximizing the effectiveness of JAG funding at the state and Focal level The following priorities represent key areas where BJA will be focusing nationally and encourages each state and Iocal JAG recipient to join us in addressing these challenges as a part of our JAG partnership: Reducing Gun Violence Gun violence has touched nearly every state, local, and tribal government in America. BJA continues to encourage states and localities to invest valuable JAG funds in programs to combat gun violence, enforce existing fireamns laws, and improve the process for ensuring that persons prohibited from purchasing or owning guns are prevented from doing so by enhancing report°ng to the FBI's National instant Criminal Background Check 8 stern (NICS1. 4 B.CA-2016-9020 While our nation has made great strides in reducing violent crime, some municipalities and regions continue to experience unacceptable levels of violent crime at rates far in excess of the national average. In 2014, as part of F JA's Longstanding commitment to support effective strategies to reduce violent crime, BJA launched the Violence Reduction Network (VRN). By the end of FY 2016, 10 VRN sites, working with a broad network of federal, state, and local partners, will be implementing data -driven evidence -based strategies to reduce deeply entrenched violent crime in their communities. States and localities can support VRN sites by investing JAG funds in technology, crime analysis, training, and community-based crime reduction programs in VRN communities. For information on VRN, see www.bia.aov/Proarams/VRN.html. Bodo -Worn Cameras, Storage, and Policies Law enforcement agencies across the country are equipping their officers with body -worn cameras (BWCs) to increase transparency and build community trust. The important benefits of BWCs, and the challenges in implementing BWC programs, are highlighted in several recent publications: see the Office of Justice Programs' Diagnostic Center report Police Officer Body - Worn Cameras' Assessing the Evidence, and the COPS Dfflce and Police Executive Research Forum paper, fmplernentrr,q A Bodv-t lfom Carrera Pragrarrr_ Recommendations and Lessons Learned. JAG funding is an important potential source of funding for law enforcement agencies implementing new BWC programs or enhancing existing programs. JAG funds may be used to purchase BWCs and for costs associated with the BWC program, such as storage and policy development_ Similarly, SAAs are encouraged to use either their Variable Pass -Through (VPT) or their "less than $10,000" funding that is added into the state award to set aside funds to assist small departments in implementing BWC programs, Grantees who wish to use JAG fonds to purchase BWC equipment, or to implement or enhance BWC programs, roust certify that they or the law enforcement agency receiving the BWC funding have policies and procedures in place related to equipment usage, data storage, privacy, victims, access, disclosure, training. etc. A copy of the required BWC certification can be found at www.b`a.ov/FundinAlorrLarrieraCe rt. df. The BJA BWC Toolkit provides model IWC policies, resources, and best practices to assist departments in implementing BWC programs. National Incident -Based Reporting System ( IBRS) The FRI has formally announced its intentions to establish NIBRS as the law enforcement (LE) crime data reporting standard for the nation. The transition to NIBRS will provide a more complete and accurate picture of crime at the national, state, and local level. Once this transition is complete, the FBI will no logger collect summary data and will only accept data in the NIBRS format and JAG awards will be based on submitted NIERS data. Transitioning all law enforcement agencies to NIBRS is the first step in gathering more comprehensive crime data. State and local JAG grantees are encouraged to use JAG funds to expedite the transition to NIBRS in their jurisdictions. Justice System Reform and Reentry There is growing bipartisan support for Justice Systems Reform and Reentry. A prom ising approach to justice systems reform is the Justice Reinvestment Initiative WI), a public-private partnership between BJA and the PEW Public Safety Performance Project_ Currently, 30 states have used the justice reinvestment process to control spiraling incarceration costs and reinvest 5 BJA-2016-9020 in evidence -based criminal justice programs and strategies. Strategic investments of JAC funds to 'implement JRI legislation and policy changes in JRI states can augment federal funds and achieve greater cost savings and reinvestments in programs to promote public safety. For state - by -state information on JRI, please visit the JRI Sites web page. Over the past seven years, DOJ has partnered with state, local, and tribal agencies and national organizations to support hundreds of reentry programs across the country to provide job training, healthcare, housing, treatment, and other services to individuals returning to our communities from prisons and jails. The demand for effective reentry services remains high. More than 600,000 men and women leave our prisons every year and more than 11 million people cycle through our jails. Investments of JAG funds to support reentry efforts at the state and local level will pay dividends for returning citizens and for public safety in America. A surnmary of research -based reentry strategies is available on the National Reentry Resource Center's What Warks in Reentry Clearinghouse along with a map identifying federally funded Second Chance Act Reentry programs at the state and Inca! level. (See https:flcsgiusticecenter,oro/nrrc). Public Defense Another key priority area is support for improving public defense delivery systems. To support this priority in November 2015, BJA established the Right to Counsel National Consortium (www.rtcnationaicarnpaien.ora ) to spearhead a national conversation on how to ensure the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel for every individual. BJA continues to encourage states and SAAs to use JAG funds to ensure that no person faces the loss of liberty without first having the aid of a lawyer with the time, ability, and resources to present an effective defense. Currently, across the nation public defense reform is being supported by governors, state legislators, chief judges and local communities. Research shows that early appointment of counsel can decrease jail and prison stays and produce better outcomes for defendants and communities. Many of these successes are guided by the American Bar Association's Ter Principles of a Public Defense Delivery System. which are recommendations for government officials and other parties who are charged with improving public defense delivery systems (htt+:flwv+rUv.americanbar.or.icontentJdarnfaba administrativelle.al aid indi*ent defendantslls sclaid def tenprinciplesbooklet-authnheckdarn ndf). Improving Mental Health Services Many people with mental illness enter the criminal justice system without a diagnosis or with untreated mental illness. Screening and assessment is critical to identify and provide appropriate referrals to treatment. This is an issue that impacts numerous facets of the criminal justice system. BJA encourages states to utilize JAG funding in support of programs and policy changes aimed at identifying and treating people with severe mental illness to divert when appropriate, treat during incarceration, and engage in appropriate pre-release planning for the provision of community treatment (see Jr.lHCP Resources). BJA provides training and technical assistance (TTA) to grantees and non -grantees (states, jurisdictions) to increase enrollment in health care plans (increase linkages to health care providers) that can increase access to treatment for improved meatal health outcomes. Information can be found at www.biatraininq.org. DOJ Universal Accreditation w!Forensic Service Providers In 2015, the National Commission on Forensic Science (NCFS) announced recommendations an strengthening the field of forensic science. There are a number of key principles, which include promoting universal accreditation and finding ways to improve upon medical -legal BJA-2016-5020 investigative processes. For additional information an these recommendations, please review the New Accreditation Policies to Advance Forensic Science. The JAG program provides broad- based support to stetes and local jurisdictions across the nation in order to strengthen aur criminal justice system, including the forensic sciences. As such, BJA encourages investments of JAG funds for programs and activities related to forensic work. including accreditation of forensic labs. Goals, Objectives, and Deliverables The Chief Executive Officer (GEO) of an eligible unit of local government or other officer designated by the CEO must submit the application for JAG funds. A unit of local government receiving a JAG award will be responsible for the administration of the funds including; distributing the funds; monitoring the award, submitting quarterly financial status (SF -025), performance metrics reports, and semi-annual programmatic reports; and providing ongoing oversight and assistance to any subrecipients of the funds. Evidence -Based Programs or Practices OJP strongly emphasizes the use of data and evidence in policy making, program development_ and program implementation in criminal justice, juvenile justice, and crime victim services. OJP is committed to: • Improving the quantity and quality of evidence OJP generates • Integrating evidence into program, practice, and policy decisions within OJP and the field • Improving the translation of evidence into practice OJP considers programs and practices to be evidence -based when their effectiveness has been demonstrated by causal evidence, generally obtained through one or more outcome evaluations. Causal evidence documents a relatiortship between an activity or intervention (including technology) and its intended outcome, including measuring the direction and size of a change, and the extent to which a change may be attributed to the activity or intervention, Causal evidence depends on the use of scientific methods to rule out, to the extent possible, alternative explanations for the documented change. The strength of causal evidence, based on the factors described above, will influence the degree to which OJP considers a program or practice to be evidence -based. The OJP CrimeSalutions.cou website is one resource that applicants may use to find information about evidence -based programs in criminal justice, juvenile justice. and crime victim services_ 1. A useful matrix of evidence -based policing programs and strategies is available through the Center for Evidence-daeeed. Crime Police at George Masan University. BJA offers a number of program models designed to effectively implement promising and evidence - based strategies through the BJA "Smart Suite" of programs including Smart Policing, Smart Supervision, Smart Pretrial, Smart Defense, Smart Prosecution, Smart Reentry and others (see httcs.iiwww,bia,gavfpragrarnsicrppeismartsuite.htm). BJA encourages states to use JAG funds to support these "smart on crime strategies, including effective partnerships with universities and research partners and with non-traditional criminal justice partners, FOIA Success Stories The BJA Suess Stare web page was designed to identify and highlight projects that have demonstrated success cr shown promise in reducing ci intie ari:1 positively impacting communities_ This web page will be a valuable resource! 'or localities, territories, tribes, 7 BJA-20190.20 and criminal justice professionals who seek to identify and learn about JAG and other successful BJA-funded projects linked to innovation, crime reduction, and evidence -based practices. BJA strongly encourages the recipient to submit annual (Dr more frequent) success stories. If you have a Success Story you would like to submit, sign in to your My BJA account to access the Success Story Submission form. If you do not have a My BJA account, please rectister. Once you register, one of the available areas on your Myr BJA page will be "'My Success Stories. "Within this box, you will see an option to add a Success Story. Once reviewed and approved by BJA, all success stories will appear on the BJA Success Story web oacie. B. Federal Award Information BJA estimates that it will make up to 1,161 local awards totaling an estimated $86.4 million_ Awards of at least, $25,4)]0 are four years in length, and award periods will be from October 1, 2016 through September 30, 2019. Extensions beyond this period may be made on a case-by- case basis at the discretion of BJA and must be requested via GMS no less than 30 days prior to the grant end date_ Awards of less than $25,000 are two years in length, and award periods will be from October 1. 2015 through September 30, 2017. Extensions of up to two years can be requested for these awards vi:i GMS no less than 30 days prior to the grant end date, and will be automatically granted upon request_ All awards are subject to The nv ilalelity df appropriated funds and to any modifications or additional requirements tirai rTiay be imposed by law. Eligible allocations under JAG are posted annually on BJA's JAG web page: www .bia.00v,PrecramDetaiis.aspx?Program lD 59. Type of Award' BJA expects that it will make any award from this solicitation in the form of a grant_ JAG awards are based an a statutory formula as described below: Once each fiscal yrr's. overall JAG Program funding level is determined, BJA partners with the Bureau of Justico 5tatiatic. (r;JS to begin a four -step grant award calculation process which consists of: 1. Computing an initial JAG allocation for each state and territory, based on their share of violent crime and population (weighted equally), 2. Reviewing the initial JAG allocation amount to determine if the state or territory allocation is less than the minimum ("de minimus") award amount defined in the JAG Legislation (0.25 percent of the total). if this is the case, the state or territory is funded at the minimum level, and the funds required for this are deducted from the overall pool of JAG See gerrerarly 31 U.S.G.. §§6'30a. -6305 (Defines and describes various forrns of federal assistance relations hips. inclUtiing grants and cooperative agreements [a type of grantit. 8 BJA-2013-9020 funds. Each of the remaining states receives the minimum award plus an additional amount based on their share of violent crime and population. 3. Dividing each state's final award amount (except for the territories and District cf Columbia) between state and local governments at a rate of 60 and 40 percent, respectively. 4. Determining local unit of government award allocations, which are based on their proportion of the state's 3 -year violent crime average_ If a local eligible award amount is Tess than $10,004, the funds are returned to the state to be awarded to these local units of government through the state agency. If the eligible award amount is $10,030 or more, then the local government is eligible to apply for a JAG award directly from BJA. Financial Management and System of Internal Controls Award recipients and subrecipients (including any recipient or subrecipient funded in response to this solicitation that is a pass-through entity) must, as described in the Part 200 Uniform Requirements set out at 2 C.F.R. 200.303: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the recipient (and any subrecipient) is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by thu Comptroller General of the United States and the "Internal Control Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (0080). (b) Comply with Federal statutes, regulations: and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. (c) Evaluate and monitor the recipient's (and any subrecipient's) compliance with statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of Federal awards, (d) Take prompt action when instances of noncompliance are identified including noncompliance identified in audit findings. (e) Take reasonable measures to safeguard protected personally identifiable information and other information the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity designates as sensitive or the recipient (or any subrecipient) considers sensitive consistent with applicable Federal, state, local, and tribal laws regarding privacy and obligations of confidentiality. In order to better understand administrative requirements and cost principles, applicants are encouraged to enroll, at no charge, in the Department of Justice Grants Financial 'Management Online Training available here, 2 For purposes of this solicitation (or program announcement), "pass-through entity' includes any entity eligible to receive funding as a recipient or subrecipient under this solicitation (or program announcement) that, if funded, may make a subaward(s) to a subrecipient(s) to carry out part of he funded program. 9 BJA-2018-9420 Budget Information Administrative Funds — Grant recipients may use up to 10 percent of the JAG award, including up to 10 percent of any earned interest, for costs associated with administering funds. Administrative funds (when utilized) must be tracked separately and recipients must report on SF -425s those expenditures that specifically relate to each grant number and established grant period. Additionally, recipients and subrecipients are prohibited from commingling funds on a program -by -program or project -by -project basis. Mcre specifically, administrative funds under JAG arc utilized for the same purpose each year (Le., the administration of JAG funding) and therefore not considered separate programs/projects (commingling is not occurring) when utilized across all active JAG awards, Disparate Certification —A disparate allocation occurs when a city or municipality is allocated one -and -one-half times (150 percent) more than the county, while the county bars more than 50 percent of the costs associated with prosecution or incarceration of the municipality's Part 1 violent crimes. A disparate allocation also occurs when multiple cities or municipalities are collectively allocated four times (400 percent) more than the county, and the county bears more than 50 percent of the collective costs associated with prosecution or incarceration of each municipality's Part 1 violent crimes. Jurisdictions certified as disparate must identify a fiscal agent that will submit a joint application for the aggregate eligible allocation to all disparate municipalities, The joint application must determine and specify the award distribution to each unit of local government and the purposes for which the funds will be used. When beginning the JAG application process, a Memorandum of Understanding (PMOL) that identifies which jurisdiction will serve as the applicantlfiscal agent for joint funds must be completed and signed by the Authorized Representative for each participating jurisdiction. The signed MOU should be attached to the application. For a sample MOU, go to www.bja.gov/Funding/JAGMOU.rdf. Supplanting — Supplanting is prohibited under JAG. Applicants cannot replace or supplant 'non- federal funds that have been appropriated for the same purpose. See the JAG FAQs on 5JA's JAG web page for examples of supplanting. Leveraging of Grant Funds — Although supplanting is prohibited, the leveraging of federal funding is encouraged For example, a city may utilize JAG and Homeland Security Grant Program (-ISGP) money to fund different portions of a fusion center project. In instances where leveraging occurs, all federal grant funds must be tracked and reported separately and may not be used to fund the same line items. Additionally, federal funds cannot be used as match for other federal awards. Trust Fund — Units of Local Government may draw do'Nn JAG funds in advance. To do so, a trust fund must be established in which to deposit the funds_ The trust fund may or may not be an interest-bearing account. If subrecipients draw down JAG funds in advance, they also must establish a trust fund in which to deposit funds, This trust fund requirement does not apply to direct JAG award recipients or subrecipients that draw down on a reimbursement basis rather than in advance. 10 BJA-2115-91720 Prohibited and Controlled Uses – The JAG Prohibited and Controlled Ependitures Guidance represents a combination of BJA-controlled items and those controlled under the Executive Order on "Federal Support for Local Law Enforcement Euuiprnent Acquisition" that was signed on January 16, 2015. The guidance contains: 1. Table of all prohibited expenditures (strictly unallowable expenditures under JAG). 2. Table of all controlled expenditures (expenditures which require prior written approval frorn BJA under JAG, including LAV guidance checklist). 3. Controlled Expenditures Justification Template (must he completed and submitted fo- any JAG controlled expenditures request to be considered for approval by BJA). 4. Overall Controlled Expenditure/Equipment Guidance (should be reviewed in conjunction with the template prior to controlled expenditures request(s) being submitted to EJA) 5. Standards for State, Local and Tribal Law Enforcement Agencies for the Acquisition of Controlled Equipment with Federal Resources. Additional information an JAG controlled and prohibited expenditures, along with the process for requesting prior approval from EJA to expend funds on controlled items, can be found within the JAG FAs. Cost Sharing or Matching Requirement This solicitation does not require a match. However, if a successful application proposes a voluntary match amount, and OJP approves the budget, the total match amount incorporated into the approved budget becomes mandatory and subject to audit_ Pre -Agreement Cost (also known as Pre -award Cosh Approvals Pre -agreement costs are costs incurred by the applicant prior to the start date of the period of performance of the grant award. OJP does not typically approve pre -agreement costs; an applicant must request and obtain the prior written approval of OJP for all such costs. If approved, pre -agreement costs could be paid from grant funds consistent with a grantee's approved budget, and under applicable cast standards. However, all such costs prior to award and prior to approval of the costs are incurred at the sole risk of an applicant. Generally, no applicant should incur project costs before submitting an application requesting federal funding for those costs, Should there be extenuating circumstances that appear to be appropriate for OJP's consideration as pre - agreement costs, the applicant should contact the point of contact listed on the title page of this announcement for details on the requirements for submitting a written request for approval_ See the section on Costs Requiring Prior Approval in the Financial Guide, for more information Prior Approval, Planning, and Reporting of Conference/Meeting/Training Costs OJP strongly encourages applicants that propose to use award funds for any conference-, meeting-, or training -related activity to review carefully—before submitting an application—the OJP policy and guidance on conference approval, planning, and reporting available at WW1V.04r.qovffinancialquidefDOJlPostawardRequirementslchapter3.1aa.ntm. OJP policy and guidance (1) encourage minimization of conference, meeting, and training costs; (2) require prior written approval (which may affect project timelines) of most conference, meeting, and training costs for cooperative agreement recipients and of some conference, meeting, and training costs for grant recipients; and (3) set cost limits, including a general prohibition of all food and beverage costs. 11 BA -2016-9020 Costs Associated with Language Assistance (if applicable) If an applicant proposes a program or activity that would deliver services or benefits to individuals, the costs of taking reasonable steps to provide meaningfur access to those services Of benefits for individuals with limited English proficiency may be allowable. Reasonable steps to provide meaningful access to services or benefits may include interpretation or translation services where appropriate. For additional information, see the "Civil Rights Compliance" section under ''Solicitation Requirements" in OJP's Funding Resource Center. Other JAG Requirements Compliance with Applicable Federal Laws Applicants for state and local JAG formula grants are required to certify compliance with all applicable federal Taws at the time of application, In that regard. Members of Congress have asked the Department of Justice to examine whether jurisdictions with "sanctuary policies" (Le., policies that either prevent law enforcement from releasing persons without (awful immigration status into federal custody for deportation, or that prevent state or local law enforcement from sharing certain information with Department of Homeland Security [DHS] officials), are in violation of 8 U.S.C. section 1373, All applicants should understand that if OJP receives information that indicates that an applicant may be in violation of any applicable federal law, that applicant may be referred to the DOJ Office of Inspector General (01G) for investigation; if the applicant is found to be in violation of an applicable federal law by the OIG, the applicant may be subject to criminal and civil penalties, in addition to relevant OJP programmatic penalties, including suspension cr termination of funds, inclusion on the high risk list. repayment of funds, or suspension and debarment. Law Enforcement Agency Training Information Any law enforcement agency receiving direct or subawarded JAG funding must submit quarterly accountability metrics data related to training on use of force, racial and ethnic bias, de- escalation of conflict, and constructive engagement with the public that officers have received. Any grantees that fail to submit this data will have their grant funds frozen. Accountability Metrics reports must be submitted through BJA's PMT, available at www,biaeerformancetools.org, The accountability measures can be found at: http:lewww.biaperformancetools,oroihelpilagdacs.html_ Body -Worn Camera (BWC) purchases Grantees who wish to use JAG funds to purchase B1NC equipment, or to implement or enhance 13WC programs, must certify that they or the law enforcement agency receiving the BWC funding have policies and procedures in place related to equipment usage, data storage, privacy, victims, access, disclosure, training, etc. A copy of the required BWC certification can be found at www. bio.govIFunding;BcdVWornCarneraCert.pdf, Any grantees that wish to use JAG funds for BWC-related expenses who do not have BV'C policies and procedures in place will have funds withheld until a certification is submitted and approved by BJA. 12 BJA-2016-0020 The BJA BWC Toolkit provides model BWC policies, resources, and best practices to assist departments in implementing BWC programs. Badu Armor Ballistic -resistant and stab -resistant body armor can be funded through two BJA-administered programs: the JAG Program and the Bulletproof Vest Partnership (BVP) Program. The BVP Program is designed to provide a critical resource to state and local law enforcement through the purchase of ballistic -resistant and stab -resistant body armor. Ajurisdiction is able to request up to 50 percent of the cost of a vest with BVP funds. For more information on the BVP Program, including eligibility and application. refer to the BVP web pace. JAG funds may also be used to purchase vests for an agency, but they may not be used to pay for that portion of the ballistic -resistant vest (50 percent) that is not covered by BVP funds. Unlike BVP. JAG funds used to purchase vests do not require a 50 percent match. Vests purchased with JAG funds may be purchased at any threat level, make. or model from any distributor or manufacturer, as long as the vests have been tested and found to comply with the latest applicable National institute of Justice (NIJ) ballistic or stab standards_ In addition, vests purchased must be American-made. Information on the latest NIJ standards can be found at: v ww.nii.aovftopicsltechnclogvlbody-armor/safetorinitiative.htm, As is the case in BVP, grantees who wish to purchase vests with JAG funds must certify that law enforcement agencies receiving vests have a written "mandatory wear" policy in effect FAQs related to the mandatary wear policy and certifications can be found at virww.bia. ovJFundinc/JAGFAQ-pdf This policy must be in place for at least all uniformed officers before any FY 2016 funding can be used by the agency for vests. There are no requirements regarding the nature of the policy other than it being a mandatory wear policy for all uniformed officers while on duty. The certification must be signed by the Authorized Representative and must be attached to the application. If the grantee proposes to change project activities to utilize JAG funds to purchase bulletproof vests after the application period (during the project period). the grantee must submit the signed certification to BJA at that time_ A mandatory wear concept and issues paper and a model policy are available by contacting the BVP Customer Support Center vestsCa.usdoi.dov or toll free at 1-877-758-3787. A copy of the certification related to the mandatary wear can be found at mom. bia_gpvfFundinalEodiArmerMandatervWearCert.odf. DNA Testing of Evidentiary Materials and Upload of DNA Profiles to a Database If JAG Program funds will be used for DNA testing of evidentiary materials, any resulting eligible DNA profiles must be uploaded to the Combined DNA index System (COD'S, the national DNA database operated by the FBI) by a government DNA lab with access to CONS. No profiles generated with JAG funding may be entered into any other non-governmental DNA database without prior express written approval from I3JA. For more information, refer to the NIJ DNA Backlog Reduction Program, available at w,w.nij.gov/topics!for+ensicsliab-operationslavidence- backloQ.siPaaeslbackloo-reduction-prop ram-aspx. In addition, funds may not be used for purchase of DNA equipment and supplies when the resulting [SNA profiles from such technology are not accepted for entry into COMIJIS- 13 BJA-2015-9020 Int"_ _ eroperabre Communications Grantees (including subgrantees) that are using FY 2016.JAG Program funds to support emergency communications activities (including the purchase of interoperable communications equipment and technologies such as voice-over-internet protocol bridging or gateway devices, or equipment to support the build out of wireless broadband networks in the 700 MHz public safety band under the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Waiver Order) should review FY 2016 SAFECOM Guidance. The SAFECOM Guidance is updated annually to provide current information on emergency communications policies, eligible costs, best practices, and technical standards for state, local, tribal, and territorial grantees investing federal funds in emergency communications projects. Additionally, emergency communications projects should support the Statewide Communication Interoperability Plan (SLIP) and be coordinated with the full-time Statewide Interoperability Coordinator (SVVIC) in the state of the project. As the central coordination point for their state's interoperability effort, the SWIC plays a critical role, and can serve as a valuable resource. SWICs are responsible for the implementation of the SCI P through coordination and collaboration with the emergency response community, The U,S. Department of Homeland Security Office of Emergency Communications maintains a list of SWICs for each of the 56 states and territories. Contact OEC, hp_dhs.00v. All communications equipment purchased with grant award funding should be identified during quarterly performance metrics reporting. In order to promote information sharing and enable interoperability among disparate systems across the justice and public safety community, O.JP requires the grantee to comply with DOJ's Global Justice Information Sharing Initiative guidelines and recommendations for this particular grant. Grantee shall conform to the Global Standards Package (GSP) and all constituent elements, where applicable, as described at: wwoveitojp:eovfgsp grentcondition_ Grantees shall document planned approaches to information sharing and describe compliance to the GSP and appropriate privacy policy that protects shared information, or provide detailed justification for why an alternative approach is recommended. C. Eligibility Information For eligibility information, see the title page. For additional information on cost sharing or matching requirements, see Section E, Federal Award Information. Limit on Number tyf Application Submissions if an applicant submits multiple versions of the same application, BJA will review only the most recent system -validated version submitted. For more information on system -validated versions, see How to Auply. D. Application and Submission Information What an Application Should Include Applicants should anticipate that if they fail to submit an application that contains all of the specified elements, it may negatively affect the review of their application; and. should a decision be made to make an award, it may result in the inclusion of special conditions that 14 BJA-2016-9020 preclude the recipient from accessing or using award funds pending satisfaction of the conditions. Applicants may combine the Budget Narrative and the Budget Detail Worksheet in one document. However, if an applicant submits only one budget document, it must contain both narrative and detail information_ Please review the "Note on File Names and File Types' under How to Applvto be sure applications are submitted in permitted formats.. OJP strongly recommends that applicants use appropriately descriptive file names (e.g., "Program Narrative,'' 'JAG Budget and Budget Narrative," "Timelines," "Memoranda of Understanding," "Resumes') for all attachments. Also, OJP recommends that applicants include rAsumes in a single file. Failure to submit the required information will result in an application being returned in the Grants Management System (GMS) for inclusion of the missing information OR the attachment of a withholding of funds special condition at the time of award. 1. Information to Complete the Application for Federal Assistance (SF -424) The SF -424 is a required standard form used as a cover sheet for submission of pre - applications, applications, and related information. GMS takes information from the applicant's profile to populate the fields on this form. Intergovernmental Review: This funding opportunity is subject to Executive Order 12372. Applicants may find the names and addresses of their state's Single Point of Contact (SPCC) at the following website: www.whitehouse.govirrnb{grants spool. Applicants whose state appears on the SPOC list must contact their state's SPOC to find out about, and comply with, the state's process under Executive Order 12372. In completing the SF -424, applicants whose state appears on the SPOC list are to make the appropriate selection response to question 19 once the applicant has complied with their state's E.U. 12372 process. (Applicants whose state does not appear on the SPOC list are to make the appropriate selection in response to question 19 to indicate that the "'Program is subject to E.O. 12372 but has not been selected by the State for review.") 2. Project Abstract Applications should include a high-quality project abstract that summarizes the proposed project in 400 words or less. Project abstracts should be • Written for a general public audience and submitted as a separate attachment with `Project Abstract' as part of its file name. • Single-spaced, using a standard 12 -point font (Times New Froman) with 1 -inch margins • Include applicant name, title of the project, a brief description of the problem to be addressed and the targeted area/population, project goals and objectives, a description of the project strategy, any significant partnerships, and anticipated outcomes_ + Identify up to 5 project identifiers that would be associated with proposed project activities. The list of identifiers can be found at www.bia_aovlfundingiJAGldcntifiers.pdf. As a separate attachment, the project abstract will not count against the page limit for the program narrative. 15 BJA-2016-9020 3. Program Narrative Applicants roust submit a program narrative that generally describes the proposed program acl:ivities :or the two or four year g•ant period. The narrative must outline the type of programs to be funded by the JAG award send prcivide a brief analysis of the need for the programs. Narratives must also identify anticipated coordination efforts involving JAG and related justice funds_ Certified disparate jurisdictions submitting a joint application must specify the funding distribution tc ca ch disparate unit of local government and the purposes for which the funds will be used. A plan for collecting the data required for this solicitation's performance measures should also be included. To demonstrate program progress and success, as well as to assist the Department with fulfilling its responsibilities under the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA), Public Law 103-62, and the GPRA Modernization Act of 2010, Public Law 111-352, applicants that receive funding under this solicitation must provide data that measure the results of their vtork done under this solicitation. Quarterly accountability metrics reports must be submitted through B,)A"s PMT, available at vnvw.bjaperformancetools.arq. The accountability measures can be found at: httrelly n.bieoerformance-aals.cretheloljagdocs.hte I. BJA does not require applicants to submit performance measures data with their application. Performance measures are included as en alert that BJA will require successful applicants to submit specific data as part of their reporting requirements. For the application. applicants should indicate an understanding of these requirements and discuss how they will gather the required data, should they receive funding. Note on Project Evaluations Applicants that propose to use funds awarded through this solicitation to conduct project evaluations should be aware that certain project evaluations (such as systematic investigations designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge) may constitute "research" for purposes of applicable DOJ human subjects protection regulations. However, project evaluations that are intended only to generate internal improvernents to a program or service, or are conducted only to meet OJP's performance measure data reporting requirements likely do not constitute "research.' Applicants should provide sufficient information for OJP to determine whether the particular project they propose would either intentionally or unintentionally collect andfor use information in such a way that it meets the DOJ regulatory definition of research, Research, for the purposes of human subjects protections for OJP-funded programs, is defined as, "a systematic investigation, including research development, testing. and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge" 28 C.F.R. § 46.102(d). For additional information on determining whether a proposed activity would constitute research, see the decision tree to assist applicants on the "Research and the Protection of Human Bubiec;s" section of the OJP"s Funding Resource Center. Applicants whose proposals may involve a research or statistical component also should review the "Data Privacy and Confidentiality Requirements' section on that web page, 4, Budget Detail Worksheet and Budget Narrative Applicants must submit a budget detail worksheet and budget narrative outlining how JAG funds, including administrative funds (up to 14% of the grant award) if applicable, will be used to 1S BJA-2©15-9D20 support and implement the program. Please note that if an applicant submits only one budget document, it must contain both narrative and detail information,. a. Budget detail Worksheet A sample Budget Detail Worksheet can be found at www.oip.eovifur etailWorksheet.pcff. Applicants that submit their budget in a different forrnat should include the budget categories listed in the sample budget worksheet. The Budget Detail V/orksheet should be broken down by year. b. Budget Narrative The budget narrative should thoroughly and clearly describe every category of expense listed in the Budget Detail Worksheet. OJP expects proposed budgets to be complete, cost effective, and allowable (e.g., reasonable, allocable, and necessary for project activities) This narrative should include a full description of all costs, including administrative costs (if applicable) and how funds wit! be allocated across the seven allowable JAG program areas (law enforcement, prosecution, indigent defense, courts, crime prevention and education, corrections and community corrections, drug treatment and enforcement, planning, evaluation, technology improvement, and crime victim and witness initiatives). Applicants should demonstrate in their budget narratives how they will maximize cost effectiveness of grant expenditures. Budget narratives should generally describe cost effectiveness in relation to potential alternatives and the goals of the project. For example, a budget narrative should detail why planned in-person meetings are necessary, or how technology and collaboration with outside organizations could bo used to reduce costs, without compromising quality. The narrative should be mathematically sound and correspond with the information and figures provided in the Budget Detail Worksheet. The narrative should explain how the applicant estimated and calculated all costs, and how they are relevant to the completion of the proposed project. The narrative may include tables for clarification purposes but need not be in a spreadsheet format.As with the Budget Detail Worksheet, the Budget Narrative should be broken down byyear. For questions pertaining to budget and examples of allowable and unallowable costs, see the DOJ Grants Financial Guide at www.oic,caovffinancialquidelindex.htm. c. Non -Competitive Procurement Contracts In Excess of Simplified Acquisition Threshold if an applicant proposes to make one or more nor -competitive procurements of products or services, where the non-competitive procurement will exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (also known as the srnall purchase threshold), which is currently set at $150,000, the application should address the considerations outlined in the Financial Guide. d. Pre -Agreement Costs For information on pre -agreement costs, see "Pre -Agreement Cost Approvals' under Section R. Federal Award Information, 17 BA -2016-9020 6. Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (if applicable) Indirect costs are allowed only under the following circumstances: (a) The applicant has a current, federally approved indirect cost rate; or (b) The applicant is eligible to use and elects to use the "de minimis" indirect cost rate described in the Part 200 Uniform Requirements as set out at 2 C.F.R. 2C0 4(1) Attach a copy of the federally approved indirect cost rate agreement to the application_ Applicants that do not have an approved rate may request one through their cognizant federal agency, which will review all documentation and approve a rate for the applicant organization, or, if the applicant's accounting system permits, costs may be allocated in the direct cost categories. For the definition of Cognizant Federal Agency, see the "Glossary of Teras" in the Financial Guide. For assistance with identifying your cognizant agency, please contact the Customer Service Center at 1-800-458-0786 or at ask_ocfo usdokiov. If DOJ is the cognizant federal agency, applicants may obtain information needed to submit an indirect cost rate proposal at vasw_oja.ctovlfundinaiApolviResnurcesrindirectCgsts.odf, In order to use the "de minim's"' indirect rate, attach written documentation to the application that advises OJP of both the applicant's eligibility (to use the 'de minimis" rate) and its election. If the applicant elects the "de minimis" method, costs rnust be consistently charged as either indirect or direct costs, but may not be double charged or inconsistently charged as both. In addition, if this method is chosen then it must be used consistently for all federal awards until such time as you choose to negotiate a federally approved indirect cost rate_3 6, Tribal Authorizing Resolution (if applicable) Tribes, tribal organizations, or third parties proposing to provide direct services or assistance to residents on tribal lands should include in their applications a resolution, a letter, affidavit, or other documentation, as appropriate, that certifies that the applicant has the legal authority from the tribe(s) to implement the proposed project on tribal lands. In those instances when an organization or consortium of tribes applies fora grant on behalf of e tribe or multiple specific tribes, the application should include appropriate legal documentation, as described above, from all tribes that would receive services or assistance under the grant. A consortium of tribes for which existing consortium bylaws allow action without support from all tribes in the consortium (Le., without an authorizing resolution or comparable legal documentation from each tribal governing body) may submit, instead, a copy of its consortium bylaws with the application. Applicants unable to submit an application that includes a fully -executed (i.e_, signed) copy of appropriate legal documentation, as described above, consistent with the applicable tribe's governanee structure, should, at a minimum, submit an unsigned, draft version of such legal documentation as part of its application (except for cases in which, with respect to a tribal consortium applicant, consortium bylaws allow action without the support of all consortium member tribes), If selected for funding, BJA will make use of and access to funds contingent on receipt of the fully -executed legal documentation. 1. Applicant Disclosure of High Risk Status Applicants that are currently designated high risk by another federal grant making agency must disclose that status. This includes any status requiring additional oversight by the federal agency due to past programmatic or fir ancial concerns. If an applicant is designated See 2 C.F.R. § 200.414(f). 1s BJA-2016-902O high risk by another federal grant making agency, the applicant must email the following information to OJPCorrulianceReeortinQCa usdoj.gov at the time of application submission: • The federal agency that currently designated the applicant as high risk • pate the applicant was designated high risk • The high risk point of contact name, phone number, and email address, from that federal agency • Reasons for the high risk status OJP seeks this information to ensure appropriate federal oversight of any grant award. Disclosing this high risk information does not disqualify any organization from receiving an OJP award. However, additional grant oversight may be included, if necessary, in award documentation_ 8. Additional Attachments a. Review Narrative Applicants must submit information documenting that the date the JAG application was made available for review by the governing body of the state. or to an organization designated by that governing body, was not less than 30 days before the application was submitted to BJA. If the 30 governing body requirement cannot be met before the application deadline, a withholding special condition will be placed on the award until the governing body requirement can be met. The attachment must also specify that an opportunity to comment was provideo to citizens prior to application submission to the extent applicable law or established procedures make such opportunity available. Below are notification language templates that can be utilized in completing this section of the application. The (provide name of StateiTerritary) rnEde its Fiscal Year 2015 JAG application available to the (provide name of governing body) for its review and comment on (provide date) or intends to do so ori (provide date). The (provide name of State!Territory) made its Fiscal Year 2015 JAG application available to citizens for comment prier to application submission by (provide means of notification); or the application has not yet been made available for public review/comment. b. Memorandum of Understanding (if applicable) Jurisdictions certified as disparate must identify a fiscal agent that will submit a joint application for the aggregate eligible allocation to all disparate municipalities. The joint application must determine and specify the award distribution to each unit of local government and the purposes for which the funds will be used. When beginning the JAG application process, a Memorandum of Understanding (MCU) that identifies which jurisdiction will serve as the applicantlfiscal agent for joint funds must be completed and signed by the Authorized Representative for each participating jurisdiction. The signed MOU must be attached to the application. For a san ^ler PACiLI (Ar, to www.bia.Ciov/ForidinodASMOLfpdf. 19 BJA-2016-9020 c, Applicant Disclosure of Fending Applications Applicants are to disclose whether they have pending applications for federally funded grants or subgrants (including cooperative agreements) that include requaestsfor funding to support the same project being proposed under this solicitation and will cover the identical cost items outlined in the budget narrative and worksheet in the application under this solicitation. The disclosure should include both direct applications for federal funding (e.g., applications to federal agencies) and indirect applications for such funding (e.g., applications to state agencies that will subaward federal funds). OJP seeks this information to help avoid any inappropriate duplication of funding. Leveraging multiple funding sources in a complementary manner to implement comprehensive programs or projects is encouraged and is not seen as inappropriate duplication. Applicants that have pending applications es described above are to provide the following information about pending applications submitted within the last 12 months: • The federal or state funding agency • The solicitation name/project name 9 The point of contact information at the applicable funding agency Federal or State Funding Agency Solicitation Name/Project Name NimeJPhone/Email for Point ct Contact at Funding Agency DOJ/COPS COPS Hirinc P'ac'am Jane Doe, 202/000-COIJi, jane.dae usdoj.gov HHS/ Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration Drug Free Cor~it7unitie3 k1entorina Program/ North County Ya.rth Mentoring Program John Doe, 202/000-0000; john.doe@hhs.gcv+ Applicants should include the table as a separate attachment to their application. The file should be named "Disclosure of Pending Applications." Applicants that do not have pending applications as described above are to include a statement to this effect in the separate attachment page (e.g., "[Applicant Name on SF - 424] does not have pending applications submitted within the last 12 months for federally funded grants or subgrants (including cooperative agreements) that include requests for funding to support the some project being proposed under this solicitation and will cover the identical cost items outlined in the budget narrative and worksheet in the application under this solicitation."). d. Research and Evaluation Independence and Integrity 20 BJA-2016-9020 If a proposal involves research andlor evaluation, regardless of the proposal's other merits, in order to receive funds, the applicant must demonstrate research/evaluation independence, including appropriate safeguards to ensure researchlevaluation objectivity and integrity, both in this proposal and as it may relate to the applicant's other current or prior related projects. This documentation may be included as an attachment to the application which addresses BOTH i. and ii. below. i. For purposes of this solicitation, applicants must document research and evaluation independence and integrity by including, at a minimum, one of the following two items: a. A specific assurance that the applicant has reviewed its proposal to identify any research integrity issues {including all principal investigators and subrecipients) and it has concluded that the design, conduct, or reporting of research and evaluation funded by 13JA grants, cooperative agreements, or contracts will not be biased by any personal or financial conflict of interest on the part of part of its staff, consultants, andlcr subrecipients responsible for the research and evaluation or on the part of the applicant organization, OR b. A specific listing of actual or perceived conflicts of interest that the applicant has identified in relation to this proposal. These conflicts could be either personal (related to specific staff, consultants, andlcr subrecipients) or organizational (related to the applicant or any subgrantee organization). Examples of potential investigator (or other personal) conflict Situations may include, but are not limited to, those in which an investigator would be in a position to evaluate a spouse's work product (actual conflict), or an investigator would be in a position to evaluate the work of a former or current colleague (potential apparent conflict). With regard to potential organizational conflicts of interest, as one example, generally an organization could not be given a grant to evaluate a project if that organization had itself provided substantial prior technical assistance to that specific project or a location implementing the project (whether funded by OJP or other sources), as the organization in such an instance would appear to be evaluating the effectiveness of its own prior work. The key is whether a reasonable person understanding all of the facts would be able to have confidence that the results of any research or evaluation project are objective and reliable. Any outside personal or financial interest that casts doubt on that objectivity and reliability of an evaluation or research product is a problem and must be disclosed. ii. In addition, far purposes of this solicitation applicants must address the issue of possible mitigation of research integrity concerns by including, at a minimum, one of the following two items: a_ If an applicant reasonably believes that no potential personal or organizational conflicts of interest exist, then the applicant should provide a brief narrative explanation of how and why it reached that conclusion, Applicants MUST also include an explanation cf the specific processes and 21 B.JA-2016-9020 procedures that the applicant will put in place to identify and eliminate (or, at the very least, mitigate) potential personal or financial conflicts of interest on the part of its staff, consultants, and/or subrecipients for this particular project, should that be necessary during the grant period, Documentation that may be helpful in this regard could include organizational codes of ethics/conduct or policies regarding organizational, personal, and financial conflicts of interest. bR b. if the applicant has identified specific personal or organizational conflicts of interest in its proposal during this review, the applicant must propose a specific and robust mitigation plan to address conflicts noted above, At a minimum, the plan must include specific processes and procedures that the applicant will put in place to eliminate (or, at the very least, mitigate) potential personal or financial conflicts of interest on the part of its staff, consultants, andtor subrecipients for this particular project, should that be necessary during the grant period. Documentation that may be helpful in this regard could include organizational codes of ethicsfconduct or policies regarding organizational, personal, and financial conflicts of interest. There is no guarantee that the plan, if any, will be accepted as proposed_ Considerations in assessing research and evaluation independence and integrity will include, but are not limited to, the adequacy of the applicant's efforts to identify factors that could affect the objectivity or integrity of the proposed staff and/or the organization in carrying out the research, development, or evaluation activity, and the adequacy of the applicant's existing or proposed remedies to control any such factors, 9. Financial Management and System of Internal Controls Questionnaire In accordance with the Part 200 Uniform Requirements as set out at 2 C,F.R_ 200.205, federal agencies must have in place a framework for evaluating the risks posed by applicants before they receive a federal award. To facilitate part of this risk evaluation, ail applicants (other than an individual) are to download, complete, and submit this form. 10. Disclosure of Lobbying Activities Any applicant that expends any funds for lobbying activities is to provide the detailed information requested on the form, Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (SF -LLL). How to Apply Applicants must submit applications through the Grants Management SvstemJGMS), which provides support for the application, award, and management of awards at OJP. Applicants must register in GMS for each specific funding opportunity. Although the registration and submission deadlines are the same, OJP urges applicants to register immediately, especially if this is their first time using the system. Find complete instructions on how to register and submit an application in GMS at ww ww,oip-govlgrnscbtf. Applicants that experience technical difficulties during this process should email GMS,HeIoDeskusdoj lav or call 888-549-9901 (option 3), Monday—Friday from 6:DO a.rn. to midnight, Eastern Time, except federal holidays. OJP recommends that applicants register promptly to prevent delays in submitting an application package by the deadline. 22 BJA-2D15.9020 Note en File Types: GMS does not accept executable file types as application attachments. These disallowed tile types include, but are not limited to, the following extensions; ",cem," ",bat," ".exe," ".v'bs," ° cfg," "_dat," ".db," "„dbf," "sill," ".Inl," ".log," ".ora," " sys," and ".zip.,. OJP may not make a federal award to an applicant organization until the applicant organization has complied with all applicable DUNS and SAM requirements.. Individual applicants must comply with ail Grants.gov requirements. If an applicant has not fully complied with the requirements by the time the federal awarding agency is ready to make a federal award, the federal awarding agency may determine that the applicant is not qualified to receive a federal award and use that determination as a basis for making a federal award to another applicant, All applicants should complete the following steps: 'l. Acquire a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS} number. In general, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) requires that all applicants (other than individuals) for federal funds include a DUNS number in their application for a new award or a supplement tc an existing award. A DUNS number is a unique nine -digit sequence recognized as the universal standard for identifying and differentiating entities receiving Federal funds, The identifier is used for tracking purposes and to validate address and point of contact information for federal assistance applicants, recipients, and subrecipients. The DUNS number will be used throughout the grant life cycle. Obtaining a DUNS number is a free, one-time activity. Cali Dun and Bradstreet al 866-705-5711 to obtain a DUNS number or apply online at wuwr.dnb.cor_ A DUNS number is usually received within 1-2 business days. 2. Acquire registration with the System for Award Management (SAM)- SAM Is the repository ftar standard information about federal financial assistance applicants, recipients, and subrecipients. OJP requires that all applicants (other than individuals) for federal financial assistance maintain current registrations in the SAM database. Applicants must update or renew their SAM registration annually to maintain an active status. SAM registration and renewal can take as long as 10 business days to complete. Information about SAM registration procedures can be accessed at www.sarr1.pov. 3. Acquire a GMS username and password. New users must create a GMS profile by selecting the "First Time User" link under the sign -in box of the GMS home page, For more information on how to register in GMS, go tow vvr.oip.ocatgmsc t. 4. Verity the SAM (formerly CCR) registration in GMS. OJP requests that all applicants verify their SAM registration in GMS. Once logged into GMS, click the "CCI claim" link on the left side of the default screen. Click the submit button to verify the SAM (formerly CCR) registration. 5. Search for the funding opportunity on GMS. After logging into GMS or completing the GMS profile for username and password, go to the "Funding Opportunities° link on the left side cif the page. Select BJA and the FY 16 Edward Byrne Memorial Local Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program. 6. Register by selecting the "Apply Online" button associated with the funding opportunity title. The search results from step 5 will display the funding opportunity title 23 BJA-2016-9020 along with the registration and application deadlines for this funding opportunity. Select the "Apply Online" button in the "Action" column to register for this funding opportunity and create an application in the system. 7, Follow the directions in GMS to submit an application consistent with this solicitation. Once submitted, GMS will display a confirmation screen stating the submission was successful. Important: In some instances, applicants must wait fcr GMS approval before submitting an application. OJP urges applicants to Submit the application at least 72 hours prior to the application due date. Note: Duplicate Applications If an applicant submits multiple versions of the same application, BJA will review only the most recent system -validated version submitted. See Note on 'Fide Names and File Types" under How to Apply. Experiencing Unforeseen GMS Technical Issues Applicants that experience unforeseen GMS technical issues beyond their control that prevent them from submitting their application by the deadline must contact the CMS Helo Desk or the SAM Help Desk (Federal Service Desk) to report the technical issue and receive a tracking number. Then the applicant roust email the BJA contact identified in the Contact Information section on page 2 within 24 hours after the application deadline and request approval to submit their application. The email must describe the technical difficulties and include a timeline of the applicant's submission efforts, the complete grant application, the applicant's DUNS number, and any GMS Help Desk or SAM tracking number4s). Note: BJA does not approve requests automatically. After the program office reviews the submission, and contacts the GMS Help Desk to validate the reported technical issues, OJP will inform the appllc.antwhether the request to submit a late application has been approved or denied. if OJP determines that the applicant failed to follow all required procedures, which resulted in an untimely application submission, OJP will deny the applicant's request to submit their application. The following conditions are generally insufficient to justify late submissions: • Failure to register in SAM or GMS in sufficient time (SAM registration and renewal can take as long as 10 business days to complete) • Failure to follow GMS instructions on how to register and apply as posted on the GMS website ▪ Failure to follow each instruction in the OJP solicitation ▪ Technical issues with the applicant's computer or information technology environment, including firewalls, browser incompatibility, etc. Notifications regarding known technical problems with GMS, if any, are posted at the top of the OJP funding web page at http: lnip.govffundinglindex.htm. E. Application Review Information Review Process OJP is committed to ensuring a fair and open process for awarding grants. BJA reviews the application to make sure that the information presented is reasonable, understandable, 24 BJ,A-2016-91720 measurable, and achievable, as well as consistent with the solicitation. BJA will also review applications to ensure statutory requirements have been met.. CJP reviews applications for potential awards to evaluate the risks posed by applicants before they receive an award. This review may include but is not limited to the following: 1. Financial stability and fiscal integrity 2. Quality of management systems and ability to meet the management standards prescribed in the Financial Guide 3, History of performance 4. Reports and findings from audits 5. The applicant's ability to effectively implement statutory, regulatory, or other requirements imposed on award recipients Absent explicit statutory authorization or written delegation of authority to the contrary, the Assistant Attorney General will make all final award decisions. F. Federal Award Administration Information Federal Award Notices OJP sends award notification by email through GMS to the individuals listed in the application as the point of contact and the authorizing official. The email notification includes detailed instructions on how to access and view the award documents, and how to accept the award in GMS. GMS automatically issues the notifications at 9:00 p.rn. eastern time on the award date (by September 30, 2016). Recipients will be required to login; accept any outstanding .assurances and certifications on the award; designate a financial point of contact; and review, ign, and accept the award. The award acceptance process involves physical signature of the award document by the authorized representative and the scanning of the fully -executed award document to OJP. Administrative, National Policy, and other Legal Requirements If selected for funding, in addition to implementing the funded project consistent with the agency -approved project proposal and budget, the recipient must comply with award terms and conditions, and other legal requirements, including but not limited to OMB, DOJ, or other federal regulations which will be included in the award, incorporated into the award by reference, or are otherwise applicable to the award. OJP strongly encourages prospective applicants to review the information pertaining to these requirements prior to submitting an application. To assist applicants and recipients in accessing and reviewing this inforn><ation, CJP has placed pertinent information on its Solicitation Requirements page of OJP's Funding Resource Center website. Please note in particular the following two forms, which applicants must accept in GMS prior to the receipt of any award funds, as each details legal requirements with which applicants must provide specific assurances and certifications of compliance. Applicants may view these forms in the Apply section of O.JP's Funding Resource Center and are strongly encouraged to review and consider them carefully prior to making an application for OJP grant funds. • Certifications Regarding Lobbying; lJebarment. Suspension and Other Resgonsibility Matters; and Drug -Free Workplace Requirements 25 BJ4-20-15-9020 • Standard Assurances Upon grant approval, OJP electronically transmits (via GMS) the award document to the prospective award recipient. In addition to other award information, the award document contains award terms and conditions that specify national policy requirements" with which recipients of federal funding must comply; uniform administrative requirements, cost principles, and audit requirements: and program -specific terms and conditions required based on Applicable program (statutory) authority or requirements set forth in OJP solicitations and program announcements, and other requirements which may be attached to appropriated funding, For example, certain efforts may call for .special requirements, terms, or conditions relating to intellectual property, data/information-sharing or -mess, or information security; or .audit requirements, expenditures and milestones; or publications and/or press releases. OJP zalo may place additional terms and conditions on an award based on its risk assessment of the applicant, or for other reasons it determines necessary to fulfill the goals and objectives of the program. Prospective applicants may access and review the text of mandatory conditions OJP includes in all OJP awards, as well as the text of certain other conditions, such as administrative conditions, via OJP's Mandatory Award Terms and Conditions page of OJP's Funding Resource Center. General Information about Post -Federal Award Reporting Requirements Recipients must submit quarterly financial reports, semi-annual progress reports, final financial and progress reports, an annual audit report in accordance with the Part 200 Uniform Requirements, if applicable, and Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reports through the FFATA Sub -award Reporting System (FRS) as necessary. Future avrardis and fund drawdowns may be withheld if reports are delinquent. Special Reporting requirements may be required by OJP depending on the statutory, legislative or administrative requirements of the recipient or the program, G. Federal Awarding Agency Contact(s) Por Federal Awarding Agency Contacts) see title page. For content information for GIS, see title page. H. Other Information Provide Feedback to OJP To assist OJP in improving its application and award processes, we encourage applicants to provide feedback an this solicitation, the application submission process, and/or the application review process. Provide feedback to GJPSolicitatianFeedback{a usdoi.gcv. See generally2 C.F.R. 200.300 (provides a general description of national policy requirements t;+aicatty applicable to recipients of federal wards, including the Federal Funding Accountability anti Trasspe rency Act of 2006 [FFATA)). 26 EdA-2C 1 u-_c:1D20 IMPORTANT: This email is for feedback and suggestions only. Replies are not sent from this mailbox. If you have specific questions on any program or technical aspect of the solicitation, you must directly contact the appropriate number or email listed on the front of this solicitation document. These contacts are provided to help ensure that you can directly reach an individual who can address your specific questions in a timely manner_ If you are interested in being a reviewer for other OJP grant applications. please email your resurrie to olppeerreviewpirnsolas.com. The OJP Solicitation Feedback email account .vi l :Mct forward your resume. Note: Neither you nor anyone else from your organization can bca riser reviewer in a competition in which you or your organization have submitted an applicat un Application Checklist Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program: FY 2016 Local Solicitation This application checklist has been created to assist in developing an application. What an Applicant Should Do: Prior to Registering in GMS: Acquire a DUNS Number (see page 23) Acquire or renew registration with SAM (see page 23) To Register with CMS: For new users, acquire a GMS username and passwords (see page 23) Far existing users, check GMS usernarne and password* to ensure account access (see page 23) Verify SAM registration in GMS (see page 23) Search for correct funding opportunity in GMS (see page 23) Select correct funding opportunity in GMS (see page 23) Register by selecting the "Apply Online" button associated with the funding opportunity title (see page 23) Read OJP policy and guidance on conference approval, planning, and reporting available at Post Award Requirements (see page 11) if experiencing technical difficulties in GMS. contact the NCJRS Response Center (see page 24) *Password Reset Notice —GMS users are reminded that while password reset capabilities exist, this function is only associated with paints of contacts designated within GMS at the time the account was established. Neither OJP nor the GMS Help Desk ufill initiate a password reset unless requested by the authorized official ora designated point of contact associated with an award ar application. General Requirements: Review Solicitation Requirements web page in the DJP Funding Resource Center, Scope Requirement: The federal amount requested is within the allowable hmit(s) of the FY 2016 JAG Allocations List as listed on EBJA's JAG web nage Pligibility Requirement: StateiTerritory !fisted as the legal name on the application corresponds with the eligible StatetTerritory listed an BJA's JAG web page 28 BJA-2016-9020 What an Application Should Include! Application for Federal Assistance (SF -424) (see page 15) intergovernmental Revievw (see page 15) Project Abstract (see page 15) Program Narrative (see page 16) Budget (see page 17) Budget Narrative (see page 17) Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (if applicable) (see page 18) Tribal Authorizing Resolution (if applicable) (see page 18) Applicant Disclosure of High Risk Status (If applicable see page 18) Additional Attachments (see page 19) Review Narrative (see page 19) Applicant Disclosure of Pending Applications (see lenge 20) Research and Evaluation lndependenoe and Interirbt (so. page 20) Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (SF -LLL) (if applicable) ';isc: 2 larrcJu 22) Financial Management and System of Internal Controls O.]^stiti: r'°7 :ire (see page 22) 29 BJA-201 fi-902 C JAG 2016 Program Narrative for City of Spokane Valley; WA. .IM.; A- ,tM.; 111 tx ( rant Proposal h2 ('i'--,: c4E-Spok.tlic- Vallcy 2.)16 F1d'vr'c1 Byrne Memorial. Justice Assistance Grant (JAG), The City of Spokane Valley will act as fiscal agent for the JAG. This is the seventh year the City is eligible to apply as a ten -disparate single jurisdiction. The City's Grant Accouraanr awl H ;llicr:AIlalyst will be rc.s.1>t:r bie for gr,illt administration details as they relate t+7 and collecting and subrnitiir .; tiri .nc :Al aid performance itLE'tl llTt [t:p its of th.; J.A(i 'finding. 177,7pc-odil 11-C'ti are trackot.1 tl`r()l, ; 11 1 id_L•ltdii 1 hrid!'e.t 1 incl -s !O!...:atAt !4.`t't2rzli grant rt'wL 1VCCI. Ci/y of Spokane Valley Projects t]1C I ::,ti:l[til' t"cLi1 j I'1➢tit Dcpa'LLncl]L_ oll 3 `]1C1s1 O .Ill {. ltl' wli puI rli7 tti'aIILP. I-i-o1,ose. tc? otic their allocation c1,6f1G funds (11'7, r)--)::") 1fti r ll't' rrllit 11M21•Aln ar ',71s ()flaw c'rccmclit. prosecution and court, and technology improvement. The entire award of $25,628 will ✓ e combined with Traffic funds provided by the Spokane County Sheriff's Office to purchase the laser scan station. This equipment will insure the entirely of an incident scene is ,..d[ lul'wd a?LLI I1 1i:ltitincc:•Cl ti's ic]. Li.i . i 11]1 c. i:i!?. -1�! {; I lt.'tw 1�'. t•?.j ._Jiting ticalli. i:1\'CS1ig,atiO:7?.. c bpcdltint. hour! of a scene, and enhancing the accuracy of evidence captured. Page 1 of 1 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant City of Spokane Valley, WA. SVJA016 Project Project Abstract 1leeri ti on: prop.Hed project for the C77.11 vn11ey's 20] 6 Justice Assistance Grant in the Lin 1of '7;7:5,628 is ('') narolinc Sc,r) ',-:iation that 1.-)rov ides an Eic curate three - d s tu 1 l'oprcse I it sccre: by quickly scanning the scene environment iFirocdiuLely after the has (Jo:L[12d and before UK-. scnc has been disturbed. This equipment will aid tbrciic i ni nd benefit tieentire criminal justice setri Goalsancl Ohicctives • Reduce! pen,oinnel needed rLeonstruet the scene, orii pitii Li%. poi11 • Eiltunce the auera,_:ynI 111L. ease information visual re-:.;resc.m.ation for ju,1;2.os, iurors_ and atLorne:,,s. that measurinent ard a fly -around 31) t.-.11‘.. + Rcduci 1 osts by .anning objects, eliminating the riced ogtor e them. • Ccnnpletu Icion orevidence for future considerazAm., el irninatin2., the need for an iilvc!,[iLr.ator to decide what is important at the time of the incidcnt. Project Strate.,zv: ▪ Develop ease -type protocol far use of the scan !-Aai ion, instil -it -4_4 that with spreL:iiic caw. types all visual (lain vvil] he collected. Parinership: + The Ci.ty will partner with Spckanc County and the Spokane County Sheriff's Office_ Thc: \\HI I provide the- n.:11.11Ln lk:Eliyjiig traffic funds ;,icqui red throu-glt DLJI Jil1LS.1. 1(1'..J111:, '. iI inIn joint US t agreeinety: for the equipment, Ant icipate4 Outcomes: + Complete scene scannirT 1IIICL L cot. rot- '1[1 ca: -2 M7c,'-, and traffix: accidents meeting the Project Identifiers + Equipment: Audio/video and Forensic: l'rovideS video representation of incident scene in a three dimensional IcTinat providing an accurate depiction (If the incident scene. + Officer safety: Allows ()film; to quickly re -open roadway after .1c.c.idents and remove themselves from harm's %.1...ay. JAG 2016 Cily U Spokane Valli:2y The City of Spokane Valley made its Fiscal Year 2D16 JAG application available to the City Council for its review and comment on June 28, 2016. The City of Spokane Valley made its Fiscal Year 2016 JAG application available to citizens for comment prior to application submission by posting on the City's website from June 24 through June 28. The application was also presented to Council on June 2$ and public comment was allowed at that time. c:;!ET1p_It':)1 111q1'111CtiOrls 1 VAL. NL m21-ott2St not6 I t lc,c1 [tom Ve'prl,..-,htzit (I) Pin post:: 1)cpi I Vrt:z;bcct pLu...trk..,1 for voir tt the prupw....;itm 1.-11 L1tr bLi..1.,j,G.1 orri recta i 1 LAI :a rn ;I . r1i12. b., r!pci nal- 11 L1SL bp:Cok'idCd, •AnyCCJr. of =tints:: nol :ippl:ct_th ra your budget FI1EY I• IL blank. ItLiiiczac: nultch .r. tIiL dapf, (2) For L:Ich budget category, you can sc.e a sample by clic','..117.p (FC. Vieli• an Eyoropte, Click Hien) at the end of each description. (3) There sne various bat iink;..; trt.:471. Thu yin_ provide additional information via cloEuricilb, (4) Rec•nril Retention: En accordance With the rqL1ILLnn[.5 set rorLb Lo .2 CFR Part 200,333 . _tic mn± 1 7.i.:corc'....;„ s-jxn1 aai all other ivcorels periit: D t:ic award shall b retained by tach oi giLn: zAioti for at: least rIrr, years following Lite lt.iie uf L1. idit report covcriri:g. C`IC .;;:;111.. period_ The informaicn .1iNctosoi tilts form is sub)...nt k tnc. Freedom of Information A.zr. 512. A. Ppm] nmol— List each position by tit a and namC of employee, if i<veitabIC. Show the annual salary tam and the percentage o. time to he devotc.i Comperanitoo paid for employees engage instmtartiviti•_smustbeconsistentwiththeapaidfarsimiiarworkwithinlite Applicant organization technic a I s.riptiou:±:;nc sesponsilulities ar.d duties of ea ch potiliers itt ralatiaaship to ruff lIins 1bs pmajeci goals sod objectives" (Aare: Use rrhok rvrr,nlrars in the pervanagr v+'onr. cm }..F7 f : is 75.0794 Mcni:llhe shown its 13.30 To 'kw an tissinpk. Click ticrq PEXSON N13 L (FEDERAL) Native Computation Salary Basis Ppttatuge of1ime LenghofTittle Cos: Yam- FEDERAL TQTA.L rERSONNEI, NAAR ATL U!ErU 1RAI.l PERSONNEL (NON-FEDERAL) Name Position Computation C' ct Salary Basis Percentage of Time LentofTime Year SD NON-FEDERAL TOTAL S4 TOTAL PF,RSON1 L SO E. Fringe lientf,Ls— Fringe tenet -us should be based on acrid' known coals or anrpproved neealialed rt by a 1 i a n an a;:t:rove] negotiated rate, fist the comp:ssitiot1 cf the fringe benefit package Fringe benefits arc far the persunnai (A) and only :ar the peacentage crf time dnvoled la the project, Fringe EaenefiCs an avaclimc hauu3 art 11mi:eel to FICA, ' ' 1•t 1..1, and Unemploymenl Comzpensalian. (Nate Use rkeiurel ejuuahela far theft%inge be iefif rem, nn txmple it 7,6S9f .•- ,'r':'! 'I :kr PC.11111, k, (11:1: 11 r11: FRINGE 131.i1.'I YITs (FEDERAL.) l3escripLidn C)ehp.r..01 i 0 Floc cos. FEDIsRA[_'TOTAL lliLNGF R7 h'EFI'I',S NA It;l'I'074l' I,;DEIt lT:} FRINGE BENEFITS (NON-FEDERAL) Description CooputatWI Celt Baas Rate SO NON•E ED RAL TOTAL $0 FRIXCEE 8RM1JRIFITSNARRAT1VF,INON•F}DERALt TOTAL ! BJNGE BENFFT TS 4j C. Trrvrl— Ilemixe travel expenses of stoff personnel by purpose (e.g., staff tc 'raining, field ilkr(ewa. advisory group meeting, e1e.), Ars the purpose of each travel expend Iure in reference io M. project objectives, Show ttx beats of computation (c.g., six people to 3 -day training or SX airfare. 53C lodging, Ste subsistence), In trailing projects, trayal and meals far trainees should b: listed separately. Show the number of trainees and the user nears irvuI &L fdertify the location of rr44, if known: or if unknown, indicaie "Iccatk' i to Le. de1etmired." L:,dicete scarce o Travel Politics applied Applicant or Feder.0 Trace] Regulations. Nate, Travel expenses for car.sultants should the "Can rracmaltt~onsultanf eat agory.Trt!'ii i R+;nntltlo. Click Linc TRAYS L. FEDERAL) Ptisl,oscUt1:,iMeI Location Carnpuia Lion Coal [tem Cos[ Basis for Qu i Rate Nranberof Feople "urmberof Trips CASs SC Lodging Night SO OC Meals Day SO OC Mileage Mile SC DC Trarspari talon: Rou,:nd-tet, SO OC LccaL Travel SO OC O'.hcr S0 GC Subtotal SO :JC FEDERAL TOTAL SO TRAVEL, NAB ATFVE 1FE1 ERAL} TRAVEL (NO N-FEDERA ) Pt:vposc aF'Ira vel Location Computalivn Coat B sis for Cosi Ra1c FON "' 11Uty Number of People ['Wilber of Trips cog 3C Luis i:i t 50.49 Meals Day SO.DO• Aleoge . 1 Mile SILK! T ear sportntion: Rnurd•1ri . sa,Ko Local Travel S11.00 Other SO.00 SutntuI SO_K! NUN-FEDEICAL TOTAL .EC _4 l t: U. ▪ — .1ti! HO' Wale: L.6411 cdpi1icIiii cIc. fI up' ipriseat Amid tre vgcci). EvuerwiRble hin 1112 ru Puii ciij hi1iGEIS:items and .diese l In fil!HI ▪ Iii C LI RiviliL c. LI 140 bi:: j:'itEil in Om "C`jr......T411,01- ter[Cy. Explain hUVOiIiC1,111111Ellbl Li is necessary for iht SUCCP-53 r.:1;i4Ct dc tic ril:u 1,:nent iihd Tat iid k I ter F.Q1FIVNIENT ii 11 Item Quantity PARC 3D Scone Laser Scanner (*nsi 1_11 1.1A11:.11.1',1 LL1 11k1. XOtr1P.1fNT NoVtli ACME 4,F EDERA DIM The Se n ration II b..1..isre for invitalip;aior (didccplIkior, liorni tide and officer ['aro lity promo; g4$1;2.: 1.6[11 many .a.:.\ontli;e,; 1,7 all I 11CI CII. lI[ccI. C:ficca s cmc c1:1121.: t;:2S prise:curchu Jc JULIE.C`; i:rLd jurors. The item will he procured utilizing the ( ..711.-°;. Ft! Nv.,.L1 clines and rciT:LIrtl Sruki!lio r.,rIJnL tvtl1 reiobutse thpcL itt excess ol .1 funds. EQ"UIPMEN'T(1/001-FE Elf -R-4.1-) Item Computation CbSI Qu2n LI tp Cost FARO 3D Scene Laser Scanner 1 S16.3'26.44, 41,024 NON-FEDERAL TOTAL $16,724 Sean Stotler' will be used for irwestigoilers sraious injury and fatality Co111sioas. horwide laid ohc r irrve1YCd fatality prolate! eases with mArilf adventag .r to a'.i Involved le include victim, sus.Pez15, Qfl19Crr cilleoling evidence. case deleetives, piesec:ltors, defense artorneYS,jLIL1 e:S and ullimatlyjurors. The- item will ho procured utilizing the City's pureh ging guidkltees aud recorded as a Cit/ asset Sp4lanr Cou,itw wll: reinih:irsc the City for the cast hi exec s of the JAG Cuild5. ='OTA:. HQUII'1QJbNl 5.11.44 E. Supplies — List items by type (Waite supplies, postage, training mean alt,copying paper. and s'xnenduttl equipment items calling less than 55,1100, such as hmks, hcnd held tape recorders) and show the bans fur eeropuIstroal. GeneraIIy, sarpplies :Delude any romerials that are expandable Dr consumed during the acurr vPlhe pro}ect, T6 VEi w a ar E r m m ple, C7irrt Miers SUPPLIES (FEDERAL) Supply I'en:s CompMatte n Cass Quantity/Duration Cosi 50 FEDER-a.L TOTAL SD 4i 1'E 1.[V" NAItRAT I i*I L1 :4u I; 1.4.11r STFPPIJF NAIIPAT1VF (N{1*I-PKIA1tA1:I 1 oc:.o d.Ciiw 1 P >I TOTAL SUPPLIES $0 It. Constrvcllon — Provide a deseriptiart or rennvat%animay be al towable_ Minor repairs of Elle ConStrWt:tir<n VI)] del and an estimate of the costs As a Mc, construct:crl cszsrs are nok ollgtrchle,. la sane cases, nnitfor tepAIrS and renovations should he c[assified in .ro "otter" category. Consult with the program office heron lindi :iag funds in this category, To Vier an F%:Imola. Ciisk F1erq CONSTAUCTIOY (FEDERAL] Purpose Deaeripliaa 01"0101}; Gast FEDEIL\L TUTAL i0 CONSTRUCTION NARRATIVE tEEDERAIII 1 CONST'RUCTIONI (NON-FEDERAL) P rpase Dcsccipiioo of Work Cast NOH-FEDERAL TOTAL CON8TRIICTION I ABRAT[VF [NOM-FED RAJA TOTAL CQ`JSTRVCT[Or 5[ G. Co motto utsiC:ontracla—Indicatewhether ::ialalicam's rarrnnLwrilenPeocurcrnsn:Poli yorllseinnIolutikulonsarefullawed. Consultant Fees: For each censuharat anter the raw, ' f kr.s. ri, to he provided, hourly er daily fee (8 -hour day), and esdmalcd time on t he project Corisuhtanl Fats in excesrof5650 per day or$S1.25 perheur requirt Rdlii°crul iLILY_;fcrsric_: PIA pnnrapproval from9iP.Tn ViRw arra tixamltle, .lickFicrc CONSULTANT rE S (FEDERAL) Name ofCansuitont Sor Lee Provided Computation Corsi Fee [iasis Quantity S Hour Day $P SUBTOTAL. $t CONSULTANT FEES. NARRATIVE (FEDE RA CONSULTANT FLES (NON-NL11E1 AL) Name of CaRsuilant Service Provided Odtntratation Cost Fee BOSis Quantity S 1IBTO7AL $11 °C iULT,it 7' 1•'[?I?.S iVARP fflT L+f•F Llt Consultant Expenses: List Ell expenses to he paid from the &rant10 the inttividual eonStiltOrnS iit tiildiilon to their fees OA., ttuve!, meats, lodging, sit.). This includes i revel expeuel5 sof 8frr4ire who j5 trot an employee of the applicant le FL As panieipestts, volunteers, pa niters, etc. CONSULTANT EXPENSES (FEDERAL) Purpa9c of1rrVel Letatian Computation Cosi HemCoot Hem Cos! Rite Basis far Rare Quanti � Number c:C Peepre Number of Trips Lcd 1 N' t E0.00 lvieals Da}' I Mile E11,011 $1100 Mileage lrensporroGion' Routed4d . St1.44 SP Leen' Travel 50.04 Other 50.04 Subs t0.1 5n,o4 SUBTOTAL 30 FEDERAL F0Tnl. S4 COTVSU LTANT EXPENSES NARRATIla f h'F AERAL''i CONSULTANT TN [NON-FEDEILAI ) Purpose of Travel Locution Computation Cot [tem COdt)tntt`Re Basis for lc Quantile Number of Pcar]e N'umbreof Trill Cast 30 LoLiging - Night 50.41 Meals Day So. li:l Mileage Mile .50.01 TriesR tabor: Rnund-ed . 50.01 LacelTrue! SO. 0.5 Othcr Sb.01 Sub Mita! 50.01 SUBTOTAL 50 NON-FEDERAL TOTAL $p kVVt.]'Aice'Ejj7J:NSESNARBA'i1.ibi[]N•FEDERAL5 TOTAL CON111.TANTS CmmtrAeps :Pvovidt a description orrhe rr„Iur...,r 5;1'11:C2 to be pronrrned by contract and an eatim Le otthe cosi. App I,cants ,rE: c:r_cr;:'tI i 1::1•11'.01:'_tc, and n :ta compe;itian in awarding o u>,trauls. A sopsf:i'n j LINO ;!.c provided Car sale sourer cen1raers in excess vr$L54.0100, a1 sale sauce contract my no Ee zwarder ro s enrnmercial OrganizMiCa1dust isineligible ! i,cacLiu.;7t.Yard. Nose: This bud get category rimy includesubawarde. CONTRACTS (FEDERAL) [tern Cost EERrii. TOTAL CONTRACTS (NUN-VEDSRA.L) ]tem Cost NUN -FEDERAL TOTAL SJR •.-'11 C�. TOTAL CUFC D_A(.7C SO C11r4.L'1.TA.NTOVIRA( [S SO 11. 011ier Oasis — List item (e,g, rent ( nes-krigth inarrsecticut nnly ), reproduction, Icic phone, jnnitoriel co' security serviarA, and it eestigative a: ceadirlardi funds) by rcU:t,r ty, ]r,l ih:; h = u Far example, provide the aqui;r: ffptnSe and the cost per square Foal for rent or provide a monthly r u iI cost and haw marry morn`s to cent. :cxl hull 10 desrribe the quantity such as siquure iaawge, rnomiss, etc. '1'n Y .Ftamyrlc. Click Here OTHER COSTS (I^E:1) .n.J.) l7cscriptinn Campulntton L,n is Quantity 8s5i5 Cost lengthaffiiru: $0 FEDEP,AL TO1AL1 5:t OTHER COSELNA$RATR'E (FEDERAL1 OTHER COSTS (NON-FEDERAL) Drspriptivi1 Conuyeakion Oast arm El Das CuSI Lcn hof`l`ime 5G NON -FEDERAL TOTAL $0 OTHER COSTS NARRATIVE INON-FRDERALIN 1. ladlrert Costs — ]ndirecl costs Are allowed i f the applialmt 1= a Fede"ally uppraved indirect cosi relc, A copy afthe rate appro tial, {e iuJty c eclIc t nc c,. ,t::l_ erg 4!: i nil 1. roust he attachul Iftha (pplieant des nat have on sppruvec'• rate, cite can be re,gw steel iny+ contacting the applicant's got aizanl Peettrn1 alaecd , or then; licna r n-.: �. cicc' to clrs: e Ll dciiii.niniizLaic_of10%ofmodifiedtotaldirecttosrsashudxatedCFR Pert 200.414C If the applicant's acco uitlgsystempe:mita.costsramI---,iII led_TI t�"_di-rC',:�is• 4..L"VO-ics (17z,,: whole mud Off asrfirirudercr,trare. on exoorpl'elsmt)arllrsctraft of 15,73%440rddbesitawr714a13.739 To View nn ls`xttNsjlei-CIieg I 1:.11.0Idl":crcos-Ts itrEti RAL) Dena:041 Computation Cast Moe Rote VI FEDERAL TOTAL $0 INDIRECT COSTS (NON-FEDERAL) Description Cvri-Lpv ation Cog Bat Rata 8,7 NON-F LTIFR1tL Torm_. sl INDIRECT COSTS NARUATTI'FINON-FEDERAla l TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS Sd Bud!pet Stumm' ry — \\ikon oli have cornpk{t:Ct Cie ht1d1zd_t lvcrizs,°ic 1, irAnsd,!r tiles [r,h1s liar c'u h category to EH spfLG.�S Ii.;lov... i.r?11_r.LiL Lk.. 1.7till d C1 E.-1 CC1.s1$ :,`--I1ti the 1ilt,1 D ICtl•C,,; costs, Indio:11.o I1 C iirt1(ttit1,i; PF fin Lig rigUeSt(tt .1iid t-"E relOL..flt of non -Federal funds that will support the project. Budget C:ltcgory Federal Request Noll-Fcdfiral Amounts Total P b -so rtin el $ ${1 LO 1i, .Fringe Benefits C I-Ni +l $0 50 30 1). Lgt.iprlwnd S25,626 St6,326 541,951 C. Supplies $0 SO Sq F. Canstructitlrl A0R � $� Cr. Con i,-1J1LnlsiC'r lneI, ....;.0Lrii� $� $Q H. l) rlw r SO SO $0 1 �I l; Direct Costs S25,618 $16,326 $41,954 I. Indirect Costs.} TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $75,62R $16,326 S41,954 Fe lentil Request $25,628 Null-Federa1 Arnatrnt 3lM26 'Mita' Project Cost $41,954 Public Reporting Burden PopeJ'lt'irrkReduc+rr.9r.•dc! evi . Under the Paperwork ReductioAct, a person is not required to respond to a coliectrc+11 o,1tt fret.tnutifrr, unless it displays a current valid OMB contra! nwnber. I4re try to create firms ms and u-1 rt'lterions then' are accurate, can he easiiy sinderstand. and which impose the least possible burden ,: n yplr 16 provide pts with tr-or•nrution. Th estimated average time to complete cndf le this application is four (4) hours per application. If you,frcrve comments regarding the accuracy of this csiirslate, 0. suggestionsfar making his forth simpler, you can write the Office of Justice Programs. Office ofthe Chief Financial Ofcer, 810 Seventh Street, AV, I'YashingtPri, DC205i1: redid iothe P2rbil1ISE? Riponed Project, 1121-OP SB, Office ofInfor+nation and Regrr1ataiyAffairs, Office r; Ma,lyd,:ermi?! roti Budget, 170shtngtorl, DC 20505. City of Spokane Valley Budget Narrative The 2016 JAG funds will be used to enhance the City's law enforcement, prosecution and court, and technology improvement programs by purchasing and utilizing a 3D scene laser scanner to record a H visual information including objects and distance and create a fly -around 3D recreation of high priority incidents. A competitive bidding process vrill be used, ensuring that the best value will be receives and JAG dollars maximized. No overhead or administrative costs will be charged against the project and all funds will be used to purchase the equipment and associated installation. The full JAG amount of $25,628 will be used for this project and additional costs will be covered by the City. The City will also pay for all administrative and overhead costs. All funds are expected to be eKpended in the year 2015_. Training costs and additional supporting equipment casts wrll be purchased by Spokane County. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 28, 2016 Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ information ❑ admin. report Department Director Approval: El ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: City Manager Recruitment GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35A.13.050 "City Manager — Qualifications"; RCW 42.30.110 "Open Public Meetings Act — Executive Sessions." RCW 35A.11.010 "Rights Powers and Privileges." PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: May 17, 2016, vote by acclamation designating Mark Calhoun as Acting City Manager until such time as a permanent City Manager is selected or November 18, 2016, whichever comes first. BACKGROUND: The attached material provides a general overview of a process to fill the City Manager position with the assistance of an outside recruitment firm. Council has the option of designating a committee comprised of staff and one or two Councilmembers to review and select an organization that would conduct this recruitment. Alternatively, the City could conduct an in-house recruitment led by City staff. Under either option, the Council would identify which candidates it would like to interview. OPTIONS: (1) Designate a recruitment committee to solicit and analyze qualifying recruitment firms and choose the firm the committee feels is most qualified to conduct this recruitment and, upon the committee's selection, authorize John Whitehead, Human Resources Manager to execute an agreement with the designated firm; or (2) Authorize staff to lead an in-house recruitment process to fill the City Manager position by means of an in-house recruitment committee. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Either: Alternative One — I move we (1) utilize an external firm to lead the recruitment process to fill the City Manager position, (2) which would include the appointment of a small committee comprised of Councilmember and Councilmember , Mr. Whitehead, and Mr. Driskell to analyze options from qualifying recruitment firms and to make day-to-day procedural decisions relating to the recruitment for expediency purposes, (3) to choose the firm the committee believes is most qualified for fulfilling the needs of the City in this recruitment, and (4) to directly authorize John Whitehead, Human Resources Manager, to finalize and execute a services agreement with the recruitment firm chosen by the committee. OR Alternative Two — I move we (1) authorize staff to lead an in-house recruitment process to fill the City Manager position, (2) which would include appointment of a small committee comprised of Councilmember and Councilmember , Mr. Whitehead, and Mr. Driskell to make day- to-day procedural decisions relating to the recruitment for expediency purposes. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IM PACTS: It is estimated that the recruitment of the City Manager by an external organization would cost approximately $35,000. STAFF CONTACT: John Whitehead, HR Manager ATTACHMENTS: City Manager Recruitment Overview Spokane _Valley City Manager Recruitment Process Overview The purpose of this document is to provide information to the Spokane Valley City Council regarding the recruitment process to fill the City Manager position. Employee recruitment can use many different components that reflect the unique needs of the organization and position being filled. Below is a list of stages generally found in most recruitment efforts that can be modified or eliminated depending upon the strategy of the employer. As a starting point in recruiting for the City Manager position, the Council may consider the use of an independent recruitment firm to conduct this recruitment. The majority of Cities in Washington state use external recruiters rather than staff of their organizations when filling City Manager positions in order to eliminate possible perceptions of bias during the recruitment and selection process. Forming a small work team composed of Councilmembers to work with the chosen recruiter on tasks may also be considered to provide efficiencies during the process. Stages of Recruitment: Defining Needs In this stage a profile or job description is created that describes the duties of the position. From this description, skills, abilities and competencies can be identified to create the yardstick that candidates can be measured by. Examples of these are: Fiscal Management Policy Development Community Understanding Dedication to the City Management Experience City Manager Credentialing (ICMA) Reliability/Honesty Time management and organization Policy Development Communication Skills Strategic Planning Leadership Energy Customer Service Other Identifying specific challenges the City Manager will face in the future may also help shape the description. This job description typically will show the level of education and experience that is required or preferred for a candidate to be considered. Compensation This stage identifies all the compensation elements of the position. Many of these are identified during the job description development. Salary surveys can be used to determine what similar organizations in the area use as the elements of compensation for like positions. Some examples of compensation elements are: Base Salary Health related benefits Personal Leave Retirement Contributions Car Allowance Other 2 Identifying Application Requirements This part of the recruitment cycle determines those materials the Council will use to identify candidates that move forward for further consideration. For example: Resume Cover Letter References Transcripts Budget Documents from Current and/or past employers Pre -Interview Questionnaire{s) Other Advertising/Sourcing Generally this part of the recruitment process looks to market the position to candidates. It accomplishes two tasks: to advertise our City as a great place to live and work for, and to compel candidates to apply. Many tools can be used to inform potential applicants of the vacancy and encourage them to apply. Some examples in the recruitment for the City Manager may include: Development of a recruitment brochure Print advertising Nation-wide or local advertising Professional networks Defined recruitment period Word of mouth Internet based advertising Social media (Facebook, Linkedin) Pre -Screening In recruitments that yield a great number of applicants, using a pre-screening process can save time and effort by eliminating candidates who clearly are not qualified. Using the needs identified in the job description, pre-screening could be conducted by the work team. Usually, this is a skimming process that uses very specific levels of experience and/or education. Criminal history checks may be performed at this level to give the team more information about candidates. Screening More in-depth than pre-screening, this stage identifies those candidates that will be offered an interview. At this stage all qualified applicants are assessed using a qualitative analysis in addition to the basic qualifications of the position. Education and Experience are looked at from the perspective of how closely they compare to the skills, abilities and competencies identified when the job description was developed. Designing the Interview Probably the most critical part of the selection process is the interview. The Council may consider as an initial step in developing the interview process, determining persons that will comprise the interview panel(s). These persons, in addition to the Council could be other community leaders. Once a panel is identified, questions would be developed that reveal the qualifications of the candidates, their ability to comprehend the questions and their performance in a potentially stressful situation. Staff can provide several question development techniques to measure a candidate's ability to perform the duties of the City Manager position. A second, more informal interview may also be used as a manner to educate the remaining candidate(s) about the City as well as measuring their follow up to their responses during the formal interview. Reference Checks Past performance is typically a strong predictor of future performance. Speaking with and asking job related questions of former supervisors and other references helps to provide a clearer picture of what the candidate's performance will likely be if hired by the Council. It is important to link the concerns 3 raised about the final candidates to the questions used in order to dismiss or confirm those concerns. The chosen recruiter would be able to provide assistance to the Council in the development of reference checking/work history questions. Conditional Job Offer Conditional job offers allow employers to seek out additional information, usually of a physical or mental nature, to assess if the candidate is able to perform the duties of the position. This information may not be considered prior to this offer as it may open the City to challenge in violation of the American's With Disabilities Act (ADA). The physical and/or mental information collected can still eliminate a candidate for consideration, but only if it shows the candidate's inability to perform any essential functions of the position. For a conditional offer to be valid, it should be offered to only one candidate and the City would appoint the candidate in the absence of information determining the Candidate's inability to perform an essential function of the position. Contract Development The City Manager contract should clarify what is expected of the City Manager and list the City's interests and the terms and conditions in which the City Manager would complete their duties. This component can be completed at other times in the overall recruitment timeline depending upon the Council's preference. The Council may consider developing a general outline of the eventual employment contract with the City Manager earlier in the recruitment process, however, some components of this contract may be specific to the individual who has been selected and may be most appropriate at the point when the conditional or final job offer is made. The contract should address the total of all compensation that will be provided to the employee to include one-time expenses such as those for moving to our community, temporary housing, etc. Job Offer Prior to a formal offer of the position is made, the Council may decide specifically what they are willing to offer a candidate to accept the position. This offer may lead to a negotiation phase which the Council may want to plan for before the initial offer, setting a range that the Council person delegated to offer the position may use to gain acceptance of the position. During recruitment, some candidates attempt to contact the hiring official, in this case the Council, to campaign for their appointment. Others may also contact the Council to express their advocacy for a particular applicant. The Council may want to come to agreement about how those situations are to be responded to in order to ensure consistent treatment of applicants. The Council may also consider to what extent they prefer City staff be involved in the recruitment process for the City Manager. Below is a sample of how staff and council roles and responsibilities could be assigned. Council Staff/Recruiter Job description development Provide sample job descriptions Compensation Provide salary survey information Determine required application documents Draft recruitment brochure Develop interview questions Provide sample questions Interview candidates Schedule interviews Conduct employment checks Provide sample employment check Make the hiring decision questions Negotiate employment contract Make travel arrangements Provide sample employment agreements Provide City information to candidates 4 Successful recruitment is one that first defines what is wanted in a person to fill a particular position, is consistent with the application of the components of the selection process, orders them in a way that best demonstrates the quality differences between candidates, and most importantly arrives at hiring an employee who performs exceptionally and is a good fit for the organization. Recruitment of the City Manager is estimated to take 120 days from the point at which the Council provides direction to staff to begin. City staff are prepared to assist the Council in filling the City Manager position in the manner chosen. The following process will be followed first for Position #2, then repeated for Position #5 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 28, 2016 Department Director Approval: n Check all that apply: nconsent n old business ®new business n public hearing n information n admin. Report n pending legislation n executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Appointment of Candidate to Interim Council Positions #2 and #5 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 42.12.070 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council previously approved the procedure for filling a council vacancy as noted in the Council's Governance Manual, adopted via Resolution 15-007. Six Candidate interviews were held during the June 21, 2016 Council meeting: Jonathan "Caleb" Collier, Pamela Haley, Frank Hutchison, Michael Munch, Michelle Rasmussen, and David Wiyrick. BACKGROUND: Once Council makes the appointment, the newly appointed Councilmember's term would begin immediately and end once the November 2017 general election results are certified, which is expected to be about ten days after that election. Approved Process to Appoint Interim Councilmember: 1. Nomination process: (Note: Councilmembers may not make more than one nomination unless the nominee declines or there is no second to the nomination.) • Councilmember makes nomination - must be seconded. • If no second that applicant shall not be considered further unless no applicant receives a second. If no nominated applicants receive a second, all applicants may be re -considered. • Once all nominations are given, the Mayor will close the nominations and Council will proceed to vote. 2. Voting process: Written ballots distributed by the City Clerk. • Vote shall be by written ballot (except if there is only one nominee). • Each ballot shall contain the name of the Councilmember who cast it. • The vacancy may only be filled when a majority of the remaining Council (whether present or not) affirmatively vote for the applicant. Since there are four remaining Councilmembers, this would require at least three Councilmembers voting for an applicant. • The City Clerk publicly announces the results of the election. • Once an applicant receives a majority of votes, if the appointed applicant is at the meeting, the City Clerk shall administer the oath of office and the new Councilmember shall be officially seated as a City Councilmember. If the appointed applicant is not at the meeting, such action is not official until the applicant takes the oath of office. 3. Subsequent Voting Rounds: If the result of the first round of voting produces no applicant with the majority of affirmative votes, then • The three applicants receiving the most affirmative votes would be considered in a second round. • Round two proceeds the same as Round One. • If one of the three applicants still fails to receive a majority of the affirmative votes, then the two applicants of the three who received the most affirmative votes would be considered in a third round, or • If there are only two applicants and they receive tie votes, a third round shall be taken • There may be discussion between voting rounds and Councilmembers may change their vote between rounds. • Round three: proceeds the same as previous rounds. • If after this round the vote of the two applicants results in a tie, then • The City Manager, with concurrence of Council, shall flip a coin to determine who shall fill the vacancy o Coin flip: the applicant whose last name is closest to A is heads; the other person is tails o If both applicants' last name begins with the same letter of the alphabet, the person whose entire last name is closest to the letter A shall be heads. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: 1. Nomination and second of candidate: "I nominate to fill council position #2." [for each nomination] as the Interim Councilmember 2. Once all nominations taken, the Mayor closes nominations. 3. Vote for candidate (by ballot). 4. Clerk Administers Oath of Office to new Interim Councilmember. 5. Councilmember takes position at the dais. Process is repeated for nomination and second of candidate to fill council position #5. STAFF/COUNCIL CONTACT: Mayor Higgins, City Clerk Bainbridge CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 28, 2016 Department Director Approval: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Comprehensive Plan Update — Residential Development Standards GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Growth Management Act (GMA) RCW 36.70A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: Per RCW 36.70A.130(1), every county and city in the state is required to conduct an update of its comprehensive plan and development regulations every 8 years. The City of Spokane Valley's update is due no later than June 30, 2017. Staff and the consultants are continuing to develop the Draft Comprehensive Plan. On June 7, 2016, staff provided the results from the joint workshop with the Council and Commission. Staff received feedback from Council on the workshop results providing further direction on the development of the land use alternatives and the goals and policies. To broaden the understanding of residential development in our region staff, will provide the standards for residential development in Spokane County, the City of Spokane Valley, the City of Spokane and the City of Liberty Lake. OPTIONS: N/A RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: N/A BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None STAFF CONTACT: Mike Basinger, Economic Development Coordinator and Christina Janssen, Planner ATTACHMENTS: Regional residential standards comparison Residential Standard Comparison Mike Basinger, Economic Development Coordinator Christina Janssen, Planner Spokane _Valley 1 Single -Family Residential (SFR) City of Spokane Valley R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 City of Spokane Residential Single -Family Residential Single -Family Compact Residential Two Family Spokane County Low Density Residential Plus Low Density Residential Liberty Lake Single Family Residential Spokane _Valley 2 Minimum Lot Size SFR City of Spokane Valley Zone R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 Minimum Lot Size 40,000 sq. ft. 10,000 sq. ft. 7,500 sq. ft. 6,000 sq. ft. Spokane County Zone Low Density Residential Plus Low Density Residential Minimum Lot Size 43, 560 sq. ft. 5,000 sq. ft. Spokane _Valley 3 Minimum Lot Size SFR City of Spokane Zone Residential Single- Family Residential Single- Family Compact Residential Two Family Minimum Lot Size 4,350 sq. ft. 5,000 sq. ft.- minimum 10,000 sq. ft. - maximum 1,800 sq. ft. Spokane _Valley 4 Liberty Lake Zone Residential Single -Family Minimum Lot Size 5,000 sq. ft. Spokane _Valley 4 Setbacks SFR Spokane _Valley 5 City of Spokane Valley Spokane County City of Spokane Liberty Lake Front Yard 15 ft. -House 20 ft. -Garage 15 ft. -House 20 ft. -Garage 20 ft. 10 ft. — House 20 ft. — Garage Side Yard 5 ft. 5 ft. Lot width greater than 40 ft. = 5 ft. Lot width less than 40 ft. = 3 ft. 5 ft. Rear Yard 20 ft. 5 ft. plus 1 ft. for each add. ft. of structure height over 25 ft. to a maximum 15. ft. 5 ft. 15 ft. Spokane _Valley 5 Minimum Lot Dimensions SFR City of Spokane Valley Spokane County R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 80' X 100' 80' X 90' 65' X 90' 50' X 80' Low Density Residential Plus 90 ft. of frontage Low Density Residential 50 ft. of frontage City of Spokane Liberty Lake Residential Single -Family 40' X 80' Residential Single -Family Compact 36' X 80' Residential Two Family 36' X 40' None Spokane _Valley 6 Proposed Regulations SFR ■ Consolidate R-3 & R-4 ■ Lot Size of 5,000 sq. ft. minimum ■ No width or depth restrictions ■ Rear yard setback of 10 ft. Spokane _Valley Multifamily Residential Standards Spokane _Valley 8 Multifamily Residential (MFR) City of Spokane Valley Spokane County MF -1 MF -2 City of Spokane Residential Multifamily Residential High Density Medium Density Residential Plus High Density Residential Liberty Lake Mixed Residential Multi -Family Residential Spokane _Valley 9 Minimum Lot MFR City of Spokane Valley Zone MF -1 MF -2 Minimum Lot Size 3,600 sq. ft. 2,000 sq. ft. Spokane County Zone Medium Density Residential Residential High Density Minimum Lot Size 4,200 sq. ft. 1,600 sq. ft. Spokane _Valley 10 Units per Acre MFR City of Spokane Valley Spokane County City of Spokane Liberty Lake 22 None Limited only by building height, setbacks and parking requirements None Spokane _Valley 11 Building Height MFR City of Spokane Valley Spokane County City of Spokane Liberty Lake Medium Density High Density Medium Density High Density Residential Multifamily Residential High Density Mixed Residential Multi -Family Residential 40 ft. 50 ft. 40 ft. 50 ft. 35 ft. 35 ft. 35 ft. 35 ft. Spokane _Valley 12 Proposed Regulations MFR ■ Consolidate MF -1 and MF -2 ■ Allow increased density ■ Provide transitional provisions to protect adjacent zones Spokane _Valley 13 Spokane _Valley Footer 14 Jurisdiction Zoning Designation Density Requirement Minimum Lot Size-SFD Minimum Lot Size -Duplex Front Yard Setback Side Yard Setback Flanking Street Setback Rear Yard Setback Acc. Unit size & height. Minimum Lot Dimensions Lot Coverage Bldg. Hgt. Density Bonus Spokane Valley R-1 1/40,000 sq. ft. N/A 35 ft. 5 ft. 35 ft. 20 ft. 10% of lot sq. ft. / 35 ft. 80' X 100' 30% 35 ft. None R-2 1/10,000 sq. ft. N/A 15' - house 20' - garage 15 ft. 10% of lot sq. ft. / 35 ft. 80' X 90' 50% 35 ft. R-3 1/7,500 sq. ft. 1/12,000 sq. ft. 15' - house 20' - garage 15 ft. 10% of lot sq. ft. / 35 ft. 65' X 90' 50% 35 ft. R-4 1/6,000 sq. ft. 1/10,000 sq. ft. 15' - house 20' - garage 15 ft. 10% of lot sq. ft. / 35 ft. 50' X 80' 50% 35 ft. MF -1 1/3,600 sq. ft. 1/3,600 sq. ft. 15' - house 20' - garage 15 ft. lO ft. 10% of lot sq. ft. / 40 ft. 45' X 80' 60% 40 ft. MF -2 1/2,000 sq. ft. 1/2,000 sq. ft. 15' - house 20' - garage 15 ft. lO ft. 10% of lot sq. ft. / 50 ft. 20' X 80' 65% 50 ft. Spokane County Low Density Residential 1-6 units/acre 5,000 sq. ft. 10,000 sq. ft. 15' -house 20' - garage 5 ft. 15' -house 20' -garage 5 ft + 1 ft. for each add. ft. of structure height over 25ft. to a maximum 15 ft. Lot size less than 30,000 sq. ft. = 1,000 sq. ft. or 10%, whichever is greater 30,000 sq.ft. -1 acre = 3,000 sq. ft. 1 acre -2 acres = 4,000 sq. ft. Greater than 2 acres = 10% of lot size 50 ft./frontage 55% 35 ft. None Low Density Residential Plus 1 unit/acre 43,560 sq. ft. N/A 15' -house 20' -garage 5 ft. 90 ft./frontage 55% 35 ft. Medium Density Residential 6-15 units/acre 4,200 sq. ft. 8,400 sq. ft. 15' -house 20' - garage 5 ft + 1 ft. for each add. ft. of structure height over 25ft. to a maximum 15 ft. 50 ft./frontage 65% 40 ft. High Density Residential 16+ units/acre 1,600 sq. ft. 3,200 sq. ft. 15' -house 20' -garage 5 ft + 1 ft. for each add. ft. of structure height over 25ft. to a maximum 15 ft. 20 ft./frontage 70% 50 ft. City of Spokane Residential Single- Family 10 units/acre-max. 4 units/acre-min. 4,350 sq. ft. N/A 20 ft. Lot width 40 ft. or wider = 5 ft. setback Lot width less than 40 ft. = 3 ft. setback 20 ft. 5 ft. 15% of lot size/20 ft. 40' X 80' Lots 3,000 sq. ft. - 4,999 sq. ft. = 1,500 sq. ft. + 37.5% for portion of lot over 3,000 sq. ft. Lots less than 3,000 sq. ft. = 50% 35 ft. When lot shares a side lot line with anon - residential zone, may build one additional dwelling unit beyond what is allowed by base zone. Residential Single- Family Compact 10/units/acre-max. 4 units/acre-min. 3,000 sq. ft. N/A 15% of lot size/20 ft. 36' X 80' 35 ft. Residential Two Family 20 units/acre-max. 10 units/acre-min. 1,800 sq. ft. 4,200 sq. ft. 15% of lot size/20 ft. 36' X 40' 35 ft. None Residential Multifamily 30 units/acre-max 15 units/acre-min 1,800 sq. ft. 2,900 sq. ft. Accessory structure not to exceed 15% of lot sq. ft. and included in total lot coverage/20 ft. 25' X 25' 35 ft. Residential High Density No maximum 15 units/acre-min None None 25' X 25' 35 ft. Liberty Lake Single Family Residential 6 units/acre-max 4 units/acre-min 1/5,000 sq. ft. 1/2,000 sq. ft.- min 1/7,500 sq. ft.- max 10' - house 20' -garage 5 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft. Accessory structure size included in total lot coverage/35 ft None 40% 35 ft. None Mixed Residential 12 units/acre-max 6 units/acre-min 1/5,000 sq. ft. - min. 1/10,000 sq. ft. -max 1/7,000 sq. ft- min 1/12,000 sq. ft.- max Accessory structure size included in total lot coverage/35 ft None 50% 35 ft. Multi -Family Residential No maximum 12 units/acre-min 1/4,000 sq. ft. - min. 1/8,000 sq. ft. - max. 1/5,000 sq. ft.- min. 1/10,000 sq. ft. - max Accessory structure size included in total lot coverage/35 ft 40 ft. lot width 60% 35 ft. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 28, 2016 Department Director Approval: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Sullivan Road W Bridge Replacement Project #0155 — Max J. Kuney, Centennial Trail Change Order GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Admin report on revised De Minimis determination on impact to the Centennial Trail related to Trail realignment work on October 6, 2015; Motion to Approve on October 13, 2015 regarding the revised De Minimis Determination on Impacts to the Centennial Trail; City Manager comments and Council agreement on October 20, 2015 for City Manager to execute Centennial Trail realignment change order based on Finance Committee approval; Info RCA regarding Centennial Trail realignment change order for soldier piles on November 10, 2015; BACKGROUND: On October 6, 2015, staff informed Council that it was discovered that the vertical clearance between the surface of the Centennial Trail and the bottom of the new Sullivan Road Bridge wouldn't meet minimum standards. As a result, the vertical and horizontal alignments of the Centennial Trail needed to be revised. Council was informed on November 10, 2015 that the Centennial Trail realignment effort would involve three change orders. The first change order (No. 7) authorized contractor Max J. Kuney Company (MJK) to purchase the steel piles that would be needed to construct a retaining wall along the north side of the realigned Trail. The second change order (No. 8) authorized construction of the first phase of the Centennial Trail realignment design, including the soldier pile and rock retaining walls, earthwork, temporary and permanent paving, drainage improvements, and other Phase 1 work. The third change order (No. 11) covers the final Phase 2 of the work, which includes a cast -in-place concrete retaining wall with decorative finish, lower stairway, walkway, railings, and related earthwork. This last phase connects the previous stairwell and sidewalk to the relocated/lowered Centennial Trail. Change Order No. 7 increased the Contract amount by $24,783.60. Change Order No. 8 increased the Contract amount by $381,138.07 and added 20 working days to the Contract time. Staff has been negotiating with the Contractor the terms of Change Order No. 11 related to Phase 2 of the Centennial Trail realignment effort. Staff has reached agreement with MJK on the prices for nine of the ten pay items listed in the change order. These nine items are valued at $36,365.59, including applicable sales tax. Staff has not been able to reach agreement on the South Overlook Lower Stairway pay item. This item includes a cast -in-place concrete retaining wall with decorative finish, lower stairway, walkway, and related earthwork. Where agreement on price cannot be reached, the Contract allows for work to proceed and be paid for on a time and materials (force account) basis. Staff recommends this lower stairway work proceed on this basis. The estimated value of the South Overlook Lower Stairway pay item is $67,650.53, including applicable sales tax. Payment to MJK for this item will be based on the actual documented cost of the work, which is anticipated to be lower than the estimated value shown in the executed change order. Based on the agreed upon prices and the estimated price for the South Overlook Lower Stairway item, the total Phase 2 change order value is $104,016.12. (Reference Change Order No. 11 — Draft, attached). The attached Change Order Log provides a summary of the Sullivan bridge project change orders through Change Order No. 11. We anticipate requesting formal Council action on this Change Order No. 11 to MJK's Contract at the Council's Study Session meeting on July 5, 2016. OPTIONS: Discussion. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: None. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The project budget includes funding to sufficiently cover the Change Order No. 11 cost. This work is eligible for grant reimbursement. The following table provides a summary of the costs associated with the Centennial Trail realignment effort and anticipated cost sharing based on the existing allocation of project funds. Cost Share: FHWA (44%) $ 226,472 TIB (19%) $ 99,081 FMSIB (9%) $ 42,492 City (13%) $ 65,677 CH2M (15%) $ 76,216 Total Funding $ 509,938 Centennial Trail Realignment Costs: Change Order No. 7 — Steel Piles Change Order No. 8 — Trail Phase 1 Change Order No. 11 — Trail Phase 2 Total Estimated Costs $ 24,784 $ 381,138 $ 104,016 $ 509,938 Following is a current summary of the overall project budget, including the above costs for the Centennial Trail realignment effort: Funding: Expenditures: FHWA $ 8,000,000 PE $ 1,824,835 TIB $ 3,500,000 RW $ 81,503 FMSIB $ 1,588,086 Phase 1 CN $ 181,145 Utilities $ 367,782 Phase 2 CN (Estimate) $13,793,376 City* $ 2,380,834 Total Estimated Expenditures $15,880,859 CH2M $ 76,216 Total Funding $15,912,918 *Includes estimated revenues from Fund 311 for added northbound lane preservation work. STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Worley, P.E. - Senior Capital Projects Engineer Eric Guth, P.E. — Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: Change Order No. 11 — Draft Change Order Log Spokane il■OValley DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DRAFT CHANGE ORDER NO: 11 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT NO: 14-039 PROJECT: Phase 2 - Sullivan Road West Bridge Replacement Project PRIME CONTRACTOR: Max J. Kuney Company CONTRACT DATE: 8/8/2014 CIP NO: 0155 DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES This Change Order pertains to: Schedule C - Work on State -Owned Lands The Contractor shall perform Phase 2 of the Centennial Trail realignment work as shown and specified in Attachment A (Drawings), Attachment B (Technical Special Provisions), and Attachment C (Assumptions and clarifications stated in Contractor's November 5, 2015 serial letter 028.), which were issued as part of Change Order No. 8. In general, the Phase 2 work includes revisions to the stairway connection between the South Overlook and the Centennial Trail and the 54 -inch high Type 6 vinyl coated chain link fence along the North Retaining Wall, Payment will be made for the Phase 2 Centennial Trail Realignment work according to the unit price list below and actual field measurements. The South Overlook Lower Stairway (Pay Item CO -11.8(C)) work shall be performed per Section 1-09.6, Force Account, of the Standard Specifications. Item No. Description CO -11.1(C) Cement Conc. Sidewalk CO -11.2(C) Rock for Rock Wall CO -11.3(C) Backfill for Rock Wall CO -11.4(C) Structure Excavation Class B CO -11.5(C) Shoring or Extra Excavation Class B CO -11.6(C) Coated Chain Link Fence Type 6 CO -11.7(C) End, Gate, Corner, and Pull Post for Chain Link Fence CO -11.8(C) South Overlook Lower Stairway CO -11.9(C) Single Rail Railing at Stairway CO -11.10(C) Pedestrian Railing at South Overlook and Stairway Unit Quantity Unit Price Total SY 84 $ 110.00 $ 9,240.00 Ton 13 109.00 1,417.00 Ton 3 138.00 414.00 CY 2 166.00 332.00 SF 30 19.00 570.00 LF 240 31.00 7,440.00 EA 2 286.00 572.00 FA 1 Estimate 62,236.00 LF 10 51.00 510.00 LF 54 240.00 12.960.00 Subtotal $ $ 8.7% Sales Tax (applicable only to Bid Schedules C, D, and E) 95,691.00 8,325.12 Total Amount of this Change Order (incl. Tax): $ 104,016.12 PHYSICAL COMPLETION Original Contract Working Days: 484 Revision By This Change Order: 0 Revisions by Prior Change Orders: 31 Total Revised Contract Working Days: 515 CONTRACT AMOUNT THESE CHANGES RESULT IN THE FOLLOWING ADJUSTMENTS OF TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT TOTAL PRIOR CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER AMOUNT (through CO #10) TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT PRIOR TO THIS CHANGE ORDER NET THIS CHANGE ORDER TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT INCLUDING THIS CHANGE ORDER $ 12,307,560.31 $ 454,990.03 $ 12,762,550.34 $ 104,016.12 $ 12,866,566.46 CONTRACTOR ACCEPTANCE: DATE: The contractor hereby accepts this adjustment under the terms of Section 1-04.4 of the original contract. RECOMMENDED BY: APPROVED BY: DATE: Project Manager DATE: Page 1 of 2 COSV Form 9/5/2014 Spokane il■OValley DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DRAFT CHANGE ORDER NO: 11 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT NO: 14-039 PROJECT: Phase 2 - Sullivan Road West Bridge Replacement Project PRIME CONTRACTOR: Max J. Kuney Company CONTRACT DATE: 8/8/2014 CIP NO: 0155 APPROVED BY: Public Works Director City Manager DATE: ATTACHMENTS: None Distribution: ORIGINAL TO: City of Spokane Valley Clerk's Office COPIES TO: Contractor, PW Project File, Project Inspector, Finance Department, WSDOT ER Local Programs Page 2 of 2 COSV Form 9/5/2014 Phase 2 - Sullivan Road West Bridge Replacement Federal Aid No.: BRM 4103(007) Contract No.: 14-039 City Project No.: 0155 CHANGE ORDER LOG CO # Description Total Cumulative Total Approved By 1 Shop Coat Temp. Sidewalk Brackets in Lieu of GaIv. $ (4,000.00) $ (4,000.00) PWD 2 Centennial Trail Traffic Control $ 10,839.00 $ 6,839.00 PWD 3 Spokane County Flora Pit Road Sewer Connection $ 51,343.36 $ 58,182.36 CM 4 Traffic Control Revisions $ 1,180.00 $ 59,362.36 PWD 5 DBE Subcontractor Substitution $ - $ 59,362.36 PWD 6 Pay Item A-15, A-48, A-49, and A-62 Deletions $ (39,280.00) $ 20,082.36 PWD 7 Centennial Trail Realignment - Phase 1, Furnishing Soldier Pile - W12 x 53 $ 24,783.60 $ 44,865.96 Council 8 Centennial Trail Realignment - Phase 1 $ 381,138.07 $ 426,004.03 Council 9 Removal and Disposal of Asbestos Material $ 1,342.00 $ 427,346.03 PWD 10 Street Lighting and Pedestrian Lighting Circuit Revisions $ 27,644.00 $ 454,990.03 PWD 11 Centennial Trail Realignment - Phase 2 $ 104,016.12 $ 559,006.15 Council CHANGE ORDER APPROVALS: City Council City Manager Public Works Director Change Order Total Original Contract Amount Change Orders as Percentage of Original Contract Amount $ 509,937.79 $ 51,343.36 $ (2,275.00) $ 559,006.15 $ 12,307,560.31 4.54% To: From: Re: DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA as of June 23, 2016; 8:30 a.m. Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative Council & Staff City Clerk, by direction of City Manager Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings July 5, 2016, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue, June 28] ACTION ITEMS: 1. Motion Consideration: Sullivan Rd. Bridge Max J. Kuney Centennial Trail Change Order — E. NON -ACTION ITEMS: 2. Review LTAC Council Goals and Priorities — Chelsie Taylor 3. WSDOT Call for Projects: Innovative Safety Program — Steve Worley 4. Law Enforcement Contract Update — Morgan Koudelka 5 Mining Moratorium, Second Extension — Erik Lamb 6. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins 7. Info Only: SRTMC Interlocal Agreement — Eric Guth [*estimated meeting: Guth (10 min) (25 minutes) (15 minutes) (30 minutes) (20 minutes) (5 minutes) 105 minutes] July 12, 2016, Special Meeting 5:00 p.m. Council Chambers Executive Session: Evaluate Qualifications of Candidates for Appointment to Elective Office (position 7) July 12, 2016, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. PUBLIC HEARING- Mining Moratorium, Second Extension — Erik Lamb 2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance, Marijuana Regulations — Erik Lamb [due Tue, July 5] (15 minutes) (5 minutes) (20 minutes) 4. Motion Consideration: To Determine Interviews for Vacant Council Position 7 — Chris Bainbridge (20 min) 5. Motion Consideration: Seth Woodard Sidewalk Project #0234 Bid Award — Steve Worley (10 minutes) 6. Motion Consideration: SR 27 and Mirabeau Parkway Intersection Bid Award — Steve Worley (10 minutes) 7. Motion Consideration: WSDOT Call for Projects: Innovative Safety Program — Steve Worley (10 minutes) 8. Admin Report: FY 2018 TIB Call for Projects — Steve Worley (15 minutes) 9. Admin Report: SRTMC Interlocal Agreement — Sean Messner/Eric Guth (20 minutes) 10. Admin Report: Annexation Discussion — Lori Barlow/Matt Dowgen (legal intern) (25 minutes) 11. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) 12. Info Only: 2017 Stormwater Mgmt Program [*estimated meeting: 155 minutes] July 19, 2016, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [length of meeting dependent upon number of interviews] Please note that this meeting will only consist of councilmember candidate interviews 1. Interim Councilmember Interviews (position 7) — Mayor Higgins July 26, 2016, Special Meeting 5:00 p.m. Council Chambers Executive Session: Evaluate Qualifications of Candidates for Appointment to Elective Office (position 7) July 26, 2016, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue, July 19] 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes) 2. First Reading: Ordinance # Mining Moratorium, Second Extension — Erik Lamb (15 minutes) 3. Motion Consideration: Approval of Stormwater Management Program — Eric Guth (10 minutes) 4. Motion Consideration: Approval of SRTMC Interlocal Agreement — Sean Messner/Eric Guth (5 minutes) 5. Motion Consideration: FY 2018 TIB Call for Projects — Steve Worley (10 minutes) 6. Last Action Item: Council Appointment of Interim Councilmember (#7) — Mayor Higgins (appointment immediately followed by administering Oath of Office) (15 minutes) 7. Admin Report: Consensus on LTAC Council Goals and Priorities — Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 8. Admin Report: Comp Plan: Draft Land Use Map Discussion — John Hohman, Mike Basinger (30 minutes) 9. Admin Report: GSI Contract Discussion — John Hohman, Mike Basinger (25 minutes) 10. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) 11. Info Only: Department Reports [*estimated meeting: 135 minutes] Draft Advance Agenda 6/23/2016 1:31:30 PM Page 1 of 4 August 2, 2016 — No Meeting (National Night out) August 9, 2016, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Second Reading Ordinance # Mining Moratorium, Second Extension — Erik Lamb 3. Admin Report: 2017 Budget Estimates Revenues & Expenditures — Chelsie Taylor 4. Admin Report: Comp Plan Draft Goals and Policy Discussion 5. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins 6. Info Only: Stormwater Management Program August 16, 2016, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Stormwater Management Program — Eric Guth 2. Council Training: Open Public Mtg Act; Public Records Act — 3. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins [due Tue, Aug 2] (5 minutes) (15 minutes) (20 minutes) — John Hohman, Mike Basinger (30 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 75 minutes] [due Tue, Aug 9] (15 minutes) Cary Driskell/Erik Lamb (60 minutes) (5 minutes) August 23, 2016, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Motion Consideration: Stormwater Management Program Plan — Eric Guth [due Tug, Aug 16] (5 minutes) (10 minutes) 3. Admin Report: Comp Plan Draft Development Regs Discussion — John Hohman, Gloria Mantz (30 minutes) 4. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) 5. Info Only: (a) Department Reports; (b) Pines & Grace Intersection [*estimated meeting: 50 minutes] August 30, 2016, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins Sept 6, 2016, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Introduction of Draft Comp Plan — John Hohman, Mike Basinger 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins Sept 13, 2016, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2017 Budget Revenues including Prop Tax — Chelsie Taylor 2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes; resolution setting budget hearing) 3. Motion Consideration: Pines Road & Grace Intersection Bid Award — Steve Worley 4. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins [due Tue, Aug 23] (5 minutes) [due Tue, Aug 30] (60 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue, Se tt66] (10 minutes) (5 minutes) (15 minutes) (5 minutes) Sept 20, 2016, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue, Sept 13] 1. Outside Agency Presentations: Social Service & Economic Dev. Agencies — Chelsie Taylor (— 60 mins) 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) Sept 27, 2016, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. City Manager Presentation of 2017 Preliminary Budget — Mark Calhoun 3. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins 4. Info Only: Department Reports Oct 4 2016, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Budget Amendment, 2016 — Chelsie Taylor 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins Oct 11, 2016, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2017 Proposed Budget — Chelsie Taylor 2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 3. First Reading Proposed Ordinance re Property Tax — Chelsie Taylor 4. Motion Consideration: Fund Allocations to Social Service & Economic Dev Agencies Draft Advance Agenda 6/23/2016 1:31:30 PM [due Tue, Sept 20] (5 minutes) (30 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue, Sept 27] (15 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue, Oct 4] (10 minutes) (5 minutes) (10 minutes) — C.Taylor (25 min) Page 2 of 4 5. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) 6. Info Only: Sullivan/Euclid PCC Intersection Project Oct 18, 2016, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins Oct 25, 2016, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed 2016 Budget Amendment — Chelsie Taylor 2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance re Property Tax — Chelsie Taylor 4. First Reading Proposed Ordinance, 2016 Budget Amendment — Chelsie Taylor 5. First Reading Proposed Ordinance Adopting 2017 Budget — Chelsie Taylor 6. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins 7. Info Only: Department Reports Nov 1, 2016, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Draft 2017 Fee Resolution — Chelsie Taylor 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins [due Tue, Oct 11] (5 minutes) [due Tue, Oct 18] (10 minutes) (5 minutes) (10 minutes) (10 minutes) (15 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Nov 8, 2016, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance, 2016 Budget Amendment — Chelsie Taylor 3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance Adopting 2017 Budget — Chelsie Taylor 4. Motion Consideration: Sullivan/Euclid PCC Intersection Project Bid Award — Steve Worley 5. Admin Report: LTAC Recommendations to Council — Chelsie Taylor Nov 15, 2016, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins Nov 22, 2016, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins 3. Info Only: Department Reports Nov 29, 2016 — No Meeting — Thanksgiving Holiday Dec 6, 2016, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins Dec 13, 2016, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Proposed 2017 Fee Resolution — Chelsie Taylor 3. Motion Consideration: Funding Allocation, Lodging Tax — Chelsie Taylor 4. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins Dec 20, 2016, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda 2. Info Only: Department Reports (normally due for Dec 27 mtg) Dec 27, 2016 — No Meeting — Christmas Holiday Tue, Oct 25] (15 minutes) (5 minutes) Tue, Nov 1] (5 minutes) (10 minutes) (15 minutes) (10 minutes) (20 minutes) [due Tue, Nov 8] (5 minutes) [due Tue, Nov 15] (5 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue, Nov 29] (5 minutes) [due Tue, Dec 6] (5 minutes) (15 minutes) (25 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue, Dec 13] (5 minutes) Draft Advance Agenda 6/23/2016 1:31:30 PM Page 3 of 4 *time for public or Council comments not included OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: Carnahan and 8th Intersection Emergency Preparedness Greenhouse Gas Emissions Policy Hearing Examiner Report Legislative Agenda Library District Discussion Open Public Meetings Act Training Sidewalk/snow removal SVMC 2.45 Review/Discussion Term Limits Undergrounding Draft Advance Agenda 6/23/2016 1:31:30 PM Page 4 of 4 Spokane Walley City of Spokane Valley Community & Economic Development Monthly Report 01/01/2016 - 05/31/2016 Page Title 1 Cover Sheet 2 Pre -Application Meetings Requested 3 Online Applications Received 4 Construction Applications Received 5 Land Use Applications Received 6 Construction Permits Issued 7 Land Use Applications Approved 8 Development Inspections Performed 9 Code Enforcement 10 Revenue 11 Building Permit Valuations Printed 06/01/2016 06:59 Page 1 of 11 Valley Pre -Application Meetings Requested Community & Economic Development Monthly Report 01/01/2016 - 05/31/2016 A Pre -Application Meeting is a service provided to help our customers identify the code requirements related to their project proposal. Community & Economic Development scheduled a total of 10 Pre -Application Meetings in May 2016. 15 10 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Land Use Pre -Application Commercial Pre -App Meeting Commercial Pre -App Land Use Pre -Application Meeting Monthly Totals Annual Total To -Date: 57 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 6 6 6 11 6 0 0 0 Oct Nov Dec 0 0 0 0 5 7 3 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 13 9 14 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Printed 06/01/2016 06:59 Page 2 of 11 Spokane ,valley. Online Applications Received Community Development Online Applications Report 01/01/2016 - 05/31/2016 Community Development received a total of 231 Online Applications in May 2016. 400 200 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec NM Trade Permit Sign Permit Right of Way Permit Reroof Permit Demolition Permit Approach Permit ME Seriesi Approach Permit Demolition Permit Reroof Permit Right of Way Permit Sign Permit Trade Permit Monthly Totals Annual Total To -Date: Printed 06/01/2016 07:03 951 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 101 101 102 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 30 47 45 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 55 69 54 114 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 105 189 222 204 231 0 0 0 Page 1 of 1 0 0 0 0 r��a.Il .000 Valley Construction Applications Received Community & Economic Development Monthly Report 01/01/2016 - 05/31/2016 Community & Economic Development received a total of 519 Construction Applications in May 2016. 600 400 200 0 4. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial - New Commercial - TI Residential - New ® Other Construction Permits J Commercial - New Commercial - TI Residential - New Commercial - Trade Residential - Trade Residential - Accessory Demolition Sign Other Construction Permits Monthly Totals Annual Total To -Date: Printed 06/01/2016 07:00 2,416 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 4 2 17 6 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 10 10 15 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 19 44 27 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *28 *25 *36 *17 *46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *109 *113 *144 *128 *135 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 8 11 22 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *3 *4 *7 *3 *2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *8 *13 6 *10 *14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *144 *246 *321 *304 *252 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 329 440 596 532 519 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 4 of 11 *Includes Online Applications. I��Ol.ile 4000 Valley Land Use Applications Received Community & Economic Development Monthly Report 01/01/2016 - 05/31/2016 Community & Economic Development received a total of 60 Land Use Applications in May 2016. 100 50 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary l Long Plat Preliminary Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits oundary Line Adjustment • hort Plat Preliminary ong Plat Preliminary inding Site Plan Preliminary inal Platting r oning Map/Comp Plan Amendment tate Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) dministrative xception/Interpretation ther Land Use Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 3 5 3 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 53 68 65 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 onthly Totals 37 65 7 '117 0 Illr Annual Total To -Date: Printed 06/01/2016 07:00 309 Page 5 of 11 .0•00Valley' Construction Permits Issued Community & Economic Development Monthly Report 01/01/2016 - 05/31/2016 Community & Economic Development issued a total of 501 Construction Permits in May 2016. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial - New Commercial - TI Residential - New ® Other Construction Permits Commercial - New Commercial - TI Residential - New Commercial - Trade Residential - Trade Residential - Accessory Demolition Sign Other Construction Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2 4 14 16 9 8 19 17 27 25 20 34 104 113 125 2 6 12 2 4 6 6 12 6 120 181 291 2 18 0 10 13 0 22 20 0 19 32 0 122 145 0 18 26 0 3 2 0 10 14 0 282 231 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 296 366 523 488 501 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 06/01/2016 07:00 2,174 Page 6 of 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I��Ol.ile 4000 Valley Land Use Applications Approved Community & Economic Development Monthly Report 01/01/2016 - 05/31/2016 Community & Economic Development approved a total of 50 Land Use Applications in May 2016. 100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary )I Long Plat Preliminary Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary Long Plat Preliminary Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits M 2 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 50 70 64 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 onthly Totals 29 51 74 66 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 06/01/2016 07:00 270 Page 7 of 11 Siiokane Ma11ey° Development Inspections Performed Community & Economic Development Monthly Report 01/01/2016 - 05/31/2016 Community & Economic Development performed a total of 1452 Development Inspections in May 2016. Development Inspections include building, planning, engineering and ROW inspections. 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016 2015 2014 2014 2015 2016 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals 764 959 1,334 1,388 1,452 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 801 974 1,063 1,243 1,421 1,761 1,624 1,145 1,053 1,060 934 777 601 633 996 1,281 1,323 1,296 1,415 1,225 1,310 1,486 972 1,027 Printed 06/01/2016 07:01 Page 8 of 11 ��a.Ile 4,0Mal1ey, Code Enforcement Community & Economic Development Monthly Report 01/01/2016 - 05/31/2016 Code Enforcement Officers responded to 31 citizen requests in the month of May. They are listed by type below. Please remember that all complaints, even those that have no violation, must be investigated. 60 40 20 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Complaint, Non -Violation Environmental General Nuisance ® Property Complaint, Non -Violation Environmental General Nuisance Property 1 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 21 33 37 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 13 14 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 18 23 46 51 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To -Date: 169 Printed 06/01/2016 07:01 Page 9 of 11 .010 Valley Revenue 2016 Trend 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 Community & Economic Development Monthly Report 01/01/2016 - 05/31/2016 Community & Economic Development Revenue totaled $371,319 in May 2016. 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -} 2016 2015 rM.-• Five -Year Trend Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct $213,319 $191,658 $383,912 $196,705 $371,319 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $77,272 $72,713 $144,159 $149,274 $188,707 $202,096 $153,853 $116,015 $132,681 $131,066 $97,315 $74,775 $108,328 $161,174 $187,199 $123,918 $117,453 $162,551 $162,864 $99,587 $181,791 $99,627 $102,195 $1,581,462 $74,628 $66,134 $198,571 $160,508 $282,086 $152,637 $117,776 $127,540 $153,838 $149,197 $84,442 $97,689 $1,665,046 $158,912 $51,536 $102,538 $106,496 $184,176 $409,592 $277,553 $102,021 $129,174 $133,561 $98,386 $66,559 $1,820,504 $34,204 $60,319 $177,737 $173,932 $268,672 $223,888 $123,137 $103,703 $113,731 $112,542 $108,948 $51,745 $43,842 $77,247 $80,774 $118,237 $84,684 $106,909 $88,247 $83,949 $167,076 $78,237 $95,172 $58,881 Nov Dec Totals $0 $0 ,356,913 $75,414 $1,540,565 Printed 06/01/2016 07:02 Page 10 of 11 1,552,558 ��a.Ile ,,Malley Building Permit Valuation Community & Economic Development Monthly Report 01/01/2016 - 05/31/2016 Community & Economic Development Building Permit Valuation totaled $36,759,030 in May 2016. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016 Trend 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec $7.96M $28.14M $55.62M $10.09M $36.76M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $6.76M $4.80M $6.38M $9.26M $18.09M $18.98M $11.21M $7.48M $10.66M $9.92M $4.89M $3.48M $2.93M $10.71M $8.07M $18.60M $6.73M $7.53M $5.05M $8.06M $5.15M $14.42M $5.86M $5.07M $3.18M $2.45M $9.90M $8.92M $34.58M $7.44M $6.37M $9.47M $12.01M $7.74M $3.60M $6.30M $25.49M $1.92M $3.59M $7.30M $22.22M $41.88M $32.91M $6.52M $8.11M $14.22M $7.25M $2.54M 173.95M'! $0.72M $2.95M $5.29M $5.32M $24.39M $33.08M $7.91M $9.89M $6.47M $8.78M $3.76M $1.66M p110.22M'. $1.46M $5.95M $5.03M $6.15M $2.53M $4.98M $3.83M $3.45M $21.54M $4.46M $3.97M $1.85M Totals $138.57M 111.90M $98.18M 111.96M Printed 06/01/2016 07:02 Page 11 of 11 SO6kane � jUalley 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ ci.tyhail®spokanevaltey.org Memorandum To: Mark Calhoun, Acting City Manager From: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director (,-f Date: June 17, 2016. Re: Finance Department Activity Report -- May 2016 Following is information pertaining to Finance Department activities through the end of May 2016 and included herein is an updated 2016 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures through the end of May. 2015 Yearend Process The 2015 books were closed during April and the annual financial report was completed in May. The State Auditor's Office will be on site by mid-July to begin the audit of 2015. 2015 Windstorm Costs and FEMA Grant Reimbursement The total 2015 costs related to the response and cleanup of the 2015 Windstorm Iast November came in at about $169,000. Additional costs necessary to repair City parks to their prior condition are expected to be about $100,000 during 2016, and we expect these costs to be included as a budget amendment to the 2016 Budget. Of the total windstorm related costs, $60,381 was expended out of the Winter Weather Reserve Fund #122. The City is eligible to participate in a FEMA grant reimbursement program related to the 2015 Windstorm, and we expect the City to recover a portion of the total amount expended on the windstorm. We plan to replenish the Winter Weather Reserve Fund #122 for the $60,381 spent once we receive reimbursement from FEMA. Through the end of May 2016, the City has received $119,717 in grant proceeds through this program. Moody's Investors Service Review of City Bond Rating As part of the issuance of the 2016 LGTO Bonds, the City went through a bond rating update with Moody's Investors Service. With the aid of our Financial Advisor, Bond Counsel, and Underwriter, staff from the Deputy City Manager, Legal, Community and Economic Development and Finance departments put together a presentation for Moody's review. On April 28th there was a phone conference with Moody's that involved the Deputy City Manager, Deputy City Attorney, Director of Community and Economic Development and Finance Director. This effort culminated in a May 10th Moody's rating update for the City that confirmed our rating at Aa3. P.iFinanceFinance Activity ReportslCouncil Monthly Reports1201612016 05 31.docx Page 1 City Hall Bond Process — 2016 LGTO Bonds The total City Hail project cost will be $14.15 million with $6.3 million covered with cash set aside specifically for this purpose plus an additional $7.8 million in net limited tax general obligation bond proceeds that will be repaid over a 30 -year period in roughly equal annual installments. The $14.15 million covers the cost of the land acquisition, design, construction, furniture and fixtures. In order to issue bonds, the City Council considered and adopted a bond ordinance authorizing the issuance, sale, and delivery of the 2016 LTGO Bonds. The bond ordinance came before Council on the following dates: • March 22 • April 19 • May 10 Administrative report on the 2016 LTGO Bond Ordinance 1st reading of the 2016 LTGO Bond Ordinance 2nd reading of the 2016 LTGO Bond Ordinance 2017 Budget Development The 2017 Budget development process began in the Finance Department in early March and on April 6t'' we sent detailed budget requests to all departments to complete by mid-May. By the time the budget is adopted on November 8th the Council will have had an opportunity to discuss the budget on seven occasions including two public hearings. June 14 August 9 September 13 September 27 October 11 October 25 November 8 Council budget workshop Admin report on 2017 revenues and expenditures Public hearing #1 on the 2017 revenue and expenditures City Manager's presentation of preliminary 2017 Budget Public hearing #2 on 2017 Budget First reading on proposed ordinance adopting the 2017 Budget Second reading on proposed ordinance adopting the 2017 Budget Budget to Actual Comparison Report A report reflecting 2016 Budget to Actual Revenues and Expenditures for those funds for which a 2016 Budget was adopted is located on pages 6 through 9. Because we attempt to provide this information in a timely manner, this report is prepared from records that are not formally closed by the Finance Department at month end or reconciled to bank records. Although it is realistic to expect the figures will change over subsequent weeks, 1 believe the report is materially accurate. We've included the following information in the report: • Revenues by source for all funds, and expenditures by department in the General Fund and by type in ail other funds. • A breakdown between recurring and nonrecurring revenues and expenditures in the General Fund, Street O&M Fund and Stormwater Fund. • The change in fund balance including beginning and ending figures. The beginning fund balance figures are those that are expected to be reflected in our 2015 Annual Financial Report. • Columns of information include: a The 2016 Budget as amended. a May 2016 activity. a Cumulative 2016 activity through May 2016. c Budget remaining in terms of dollars. o The percent of budgeted revenue collected or budgeted expenditures disbursed. P:1FinancelFinance Activity ReportslCouncit Monthly Reportsl201612016 05 31.docx Page 2 A few points related to the General Fund #001 (page 5): Recurring revenues collections are currently at 39.40% of the amount budgeted with 41.7% of the year elapsed. • Property tax are paid to Spokane County in two installments each year on April 30 and October 31 and are then remitted to the City primarily in May and November with lesser amounts typically remitted in June and December. Property taxes received thus far in 2016 are $5,360,856 or 46.70% of the amount budgeted. • Sates tax collections represent only 4 -months of collections thus far because taxes collected in May are not remitted to the City by the State until the latter part of June. Collections are currently $6,199,120 or 33.54% of the amount budgeted. • Gambling taxes are at $105,170 or 31.58% of the amount budgeted. Gambling taxes are paid quarterly with second quarter payments due by July 30. • Franchise Fee and Business Registration revenues are typically received in the month following a calendar year quarter. So far in 2016 we have received $331,829 or 28.75% of the amount budgeted. • State shared revenues are composed of State of Washington distributions that include items such as liquor board profits, liquor excise tax, streamlined sales tax mitigation and criminal justice monies. Most of these revenues are paid by the State in the month following a calendar quarter, Through May we've received remittances totaling $558,517 or 27.59% of the amount budgeted. • Fines and forfeitures revenues are composed of monthly remittances from Spokane County with payments made in the month following the actual assessment of a fine and false alarm fees. Through May 2016 we've received remittances through the month of April with receipts of $466,976 or 32.35% of the amount budgeted. • Community Development service revenues are largely composed of building permit and plan review fees as well as right of way permits. Revenues are currently at $1,314,153 88.11% of the amount budgeted. • Recreation program fees are composed of revenues generated by the variety of parks and recreation programs including classes, swimming pools (in -season), and CenterPlace. Currently, revenues total $295,462 or 48.58% of the amount budgeted. Recurring expenditures are currently at $14,085,173 or 35.49% of the amount budgeted with 41.7% of the year elapsed. Departments experience seasonal fluctuations in activity so they don't necessarily expend their budget in twelve equal monthly installments Investments (page 20) Investments at May 30 total $52,036.831 and are composed of $47,025,336 in the Washington State Local Government Investment Pool and $5,011,495 in bank CDs. Total Sales Tax Receipts (page 21) Total sales tax receipts reflect State remittances through May and total $7,006,415 including general, criminal justice and public safety taxes. This figure is $627,765 or 9.84% greater than the same 4 -month period in 2015. P:1FinancelFinance Activity RepartsCouncil,Monthly Reports1201612016 0531.docx Page 3 Economic indicators (pages 22 — 24) The following economic indicators provide information pertaining to three different sources of tax revenue that provide a good gauge of the health and direction of the overall economy. 1. Sales taxes (page 22) provide a sense of how much individuals and businesses are spending on the purchase of goods. 2. Hotel / Motel taxes (page 23) provide us with a sense of overnight stays and visits to our area by tourists or business travelers. 3. Real Estate Excise taxes (page 24) provide us with a sense of real estate sales. Page 22 provides a 10 -year history of general sales tax receipts (not including public safety or criminal justice) with monthly detail beginning January 2007. • Compared with calendar year 2015, 2016 collections have increased by $572,150 or 10.17%. • Tax receipts reached an all-time high in 2015 at $18,209,568, besting the previous record year of 2014 when $17,440,083 was collected. Page 23 provides a 10 -year history of hotel/motel tax receipts with monthly detail beginning January 2007. • Compared with calendar year 2015, 2016 collections have increased by $8,885 or 6.45%. • Collections reached an all-time high in 2015 of $581,237, exceeding the previous high set in 2014 of $549,267. Page 24 provides a 10 -year history of real estate excise tax receipts with monthly detail beginning January 2007. • Compared with calendar year 2015, 2016 collections have increased by $56,948 or 9.46%. • Tax receipts peaked in 2007 at nearly $2.6 million, decreased precipitously in 2008 and 2009, and are slowly gaining ground. Debt Capacity and Bonds Outstanding (page 25) This page provides information on the City's debt capacity, or the dollar amount of General Obligation (G.O.) Bonds the City may issue, as well as an amortization schedule of the bonds the City currently has outstanding. • The maximum amount of G.O. bonds the City may issue is determined by the assessed value for property taxes which for 2016 is $7,748,275,097. Following the December 1, 2015, debt service payment the City has $13,650,000 of nonvoted G.Q. bonds outstanding which represents 11.74% of our nonvoted bond capacity, and 2.35% of our total debt capacity for all types of bonds. Of this amount: o $5,250,000 remains on bonds issued for the construction of CenterPlace. These bonds are repaid with a portion of the 1/10 of 1% sales tax that is collected by the Spokane Public Facilities District. a $1,125,000 remains on bonds issued for road and street improvements around CenterPlace. The bonds are repaid with a portion of the real estate excise tax collected by the City. o $7,275,000 remains on bonds issued for construction of the new City Hall building. The bonds are to be repaid with Genera! Fund revenues. P.1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201612016 05 31.docx Page 4 Street Fund Revenue Sources (pages 26 and 27) The last two charts reflect a history for the two primary sources of revenue in Street Fund #101. These include: • Page 26 provides a 10 -year history of Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax collections with monthly detail beginning January 2007. ❑ Compared with calendar year 2015, 2016 collections have increased by $42,750 or 7.16%. a Tax receipts peaked in 2007 at just approximately $2.1 million, and subsequently decreased to a range of approximately $1,857,000 to $1,940,000 in the years 2011 through 2015. • Page 27 provides a 6 -year history of Telephone Utility Tax collections with monthly detail beginning January 2009 (the month in which the tax was imposed). o Compared with 2015, 2016 collections have decreased by $74,845 or 9.60%. ❑ Tax receipts peaked in 2009 at $3,054,473 and have decreased each year since due to what we suspect is the reduction in land lines by individual households. a The 2016 Budget was adopted with a revenue estimate of $2,340,000. We will watch this closely as we progress through the coming months. a The City is in the process of hiring a consultant to perform an audit of providers who pay the telephone utility tax. The audit will assess whether providers are accurately remitting all taxes owed to the City, and the consultant will be paid on a contingent basis out of revenues recovered from the telephone providers_ P.1Finance1Finance Activity ReportslCouncil Monthly Reports12016\2016 05 31.docx Page 5 P;IFinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports12D1612016 05 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Five -Month Period Ended May 31, 2016 #Q01 - GENERAL FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Budget Year Elapsed = 2016 41.7% 2016 Budget Actual May Actual thru Budget May 31 Remaining % of Budget Revenues Property Tax 11,479,200 4,566,861 5,360,856 (6,118,344) 46.70°/° Sales Tax 18,480,500 1,640,913 6,199,120 (12,281,380) 33.64% Sales Tax - CriminalJustice 1,556,400 136,149 518,869 (1,037,531) 33.34% Sales Tax - Public Safety 867,40075,525 288,426 [578,974) 33.25% Gambling Tax and Leasehold Excise Tax 333,000 4,317 105,170 (227,830) 31.58% Franchise Fees/Business Registration 1,154,000 8,272 331,829 (822,171) 28.75°/° State Shares• Revenues 2,024,528 0 558,517 (1,466,011) 27.59% Fines, Forfeitures and Penalties 1,443,500 86,319 466,976 (976,524) 32.35% Community Development 1,491,500 363,797 1,314,153 (177,347) 88.11% Recreation Program Fees 608,200 47,010 295,462 (312,738) 48.58% Miscellaneous Department Revenue 95,900 11,834 50,154 [45,746} 52.30% Miscellaneous & Investment Interest 104,200 16,781 144,480 40,280 138.66°% Transfer -in - #101 {street admin.) 39,700 0 13,233 (26,467) 33.33°/0 Transfer -in #105 (hIm rax -C.' advertising) 30,000 0 0 (30.000) 0.00°% Transfer -in - #402 (storm admin) 13,400 0 4,467 (8,933) 33.33°/0 Total Recurring Revenues 39.721,428 6,957,777 15,651,711 (24,069,717) 39.40% Expenditures City Council 506,869 24,719 191,200 315,569 37.72% City Manager 717,303 36,095 252,776 46,527 35.24°% Legal 479,951 42,790 207,326 272,625 43.20% Public Safety 24,703,749 1,901,599 9,083,563 15,620,196 36,77% Deputy City Manager 737,002 48,540 271,790 465,21,^ 36.88% Finance f IT 1,253,080 101,393 479,374 773,706 38.26% Human Resources 255,694 21,284 100,513155,181 39.31"% Public Works 966,870 54,323 331,741 635,129 34.31% Community Development -Administration 272,107 21,144 113,991 158,116 41.89°% Community Development - Econ Dev 545.157 31,769 148,005 397,152 27,15% Community Development- Dev Svc 1,486,637 107,156 575,514 911,124 38.71°/0 Community Development -Building 1,344,165 104,189 534,203 809,962 39.7496 Parks & Rec - Administration 281,871 19,119 104,127 177,744 36.94% Parks & Rec - Maintenance 832,043 187,467 262,091 569.952 31.50% Parks & Rec - Recreation 241,197 11,859 71,063 170,134 29.46°% Parks & Rec - Aquatics 461,200 1.444 11,221 449,979 2.43% Parks & Rec - Senior Center 95,781 7,207 35,990 59,791 37.58% Parks & Rec - CenterPlace 882,223 58,061 304,391 577,832 34.50% Pavement Preservation 943,800 0 314,600 629,200 33.33% General Government 1,617,500 171,496 415,297 1,202,203 25.6896 Transfers out - #502 (insurance premium) 325,000 0 108,333 216,667 33.33% Transfers oui - #309 (parr, caprtar projacts) 200,300 0 53,333 146,967 26.63% Transfers out - #310 (bond prat>$434.6 lease pmt) 72,500 0 24,167 48,333 33.33°I° Transfers oul - #310 (city hair o&m costs) 271,700 0 90,567 181,133 33.33% Transfers out - #204 ("16 LTGO bond debt service) 198,734 0 0 198,734 0.00% Total Recurring Expenditures 39,692,433 2,951,653 14,085,173 25,607,260 35.49% Recurring Revenues Over (Under) Recurring Expenditures 28,995 4,006,124 1,566,538 1,537,543 Page 6 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Gouncil Monthly Reports1201612016 05 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Five -Month Period Ended May 31, 2016 #001 - GENERAL FUND - continued NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Budget Year Elapsed = 2016 41.7% 2016 Budget Actual May Actual thru Budget May 31 Remaining % of Budget Revenues Transfers in - #106 (Repymt of Solid Waste) 40,425 Transfers in - #310 (Lease in excess of bond pyi 198,734 0 13,475 (26,950) 33.33% 0 0 (198,734) 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Revenues 239,159 0 13,475 (225.684) 5.63% Expenditures. General Government - IT capital replacements 108,000 0 87,949 20,051 81.43% Community & Econ Dev {comp plan update) 350,000 0 669 349,332 0,19% Parks & Rec (upgrade dial-up modem at pools) 15,000 1,976 2,209 12,791 14.73°/° Parks & Rec (additional catering secs) 0 0 16,583 (16,583) 0.00% Parks & Rec (Windstorm Park Clean-up) 0 0 38,088 (38,088) 0.00% Parks & Rec (CenterPtace Roof Repairs) 52,000 0 0 52,000 0.00% Police Department - CAD/RMS 140,281 0 0 140,281 0.00%° Police Precinct (security camera upgrade) 6,400 0 0 6,400 0.00%° Police Precinct (office construction) 25,000 0 0 25000 0.00°Ie Transfers out - #312 ('14 Fund Bat' 50%) 1,828,723 0 0 1,828,723 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 2,525,404 1,976 145,498 2,379,906 5.76% Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under) Nonrecurring, Expenditures (2,286,245) (1,976) (132,023) 2,154,222 Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues Over (Under) Total Expenditures (2,257.250) 4,004,148 1.434,515 3,691,765 Beginning fund balance 26,067,102 26,067,102 Ending fund balance 23,809.852 27,501,617 Page 7 P:IFinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201612016 05 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Five -Month Period Ended May 31, 2016 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS #101 - STREET FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Budget Year Elapsed = 2016 41.7% 2016 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget ° of May May 31 Remaining Budget Revenues Utility Tax 2,340,000 171,770 705,118 (1,634,882) 30.13% Motor Vehicle Fuel (Gas) Tax 2,004,900 166,601 637,108 (1,367,792) 31.78% Multimodal Transportation 0 0 47,756 47,756 0.00% Investment interest 3,000 572 2,007 (993) 66.91% Insurance Premiums & Recoveries 0 0 2,854 2,854 0.00% Miscellaneous Revenue 10,000 0 16 (9,984) 0.16% Total Recurring Revenues 4,357.900 338,943 1.394,858 (2,963,042) 32.01% Expenditures Wages 1 Benefits f Payroll Taxes 734,604 62,432 351,352 383,252 47.83% Supplies 111,500 30,570 40,235 71,265 36,08% Services & Charges 2,132,754 174,480 425,121 1,707.633 19.93% Snow Operations 430,000 19.944 218,604 211,396 50.84% Intergovernmental Payments 771,000 50,014 205,735 565.265 26.68% Interfund Transfers -out - #001 39,700 0 13,233 26,467 33.33% Interfund Transfers -out - #501 (non -plow vehicle 71,000 0 23,667 47.333 33.33%❑ Interfund Transfers -out - #311 (pavement preserve 67,342 0 22,447 44,895 33.33% Total Recurring Expenditures 4,357,900 337,441 1,300,394 3,057,506 29.84% Recurring Revenues Over (Under) Recurring Expenditures 0 1,502 94,464 94,464 NONRECURRING .ACTIVITY Revenues Grants Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 56,035 56,035 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Revenues 0 0 56,035 56,035 0.00% Expenditures Capital 0 40 1.765 (1,765) 0.00% Signal Detection Equipment Upgrades 20,000 0 0 20.000 0.00% Maintenance Facility Storage Unit 5,000 0 0 5,000 0.00% lnterfund Transfers -out - #303 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 25,000 40 1,765 23,235 7.06% Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (25,000) (40) 54,271 79,271 Excess (Deficit) of -otal Revenues Over (Underi Total Expenditures (25,000) 1,462 148,735 173,735 Beginning fund balance 1,431,496 1,431,496 Ending fund balance 1,406,496 1,580.231 Page 8 P:1Finance\Finance Activity ReportslCouncil Monthly Reports1201612016 05 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Five -Month Period Ended May 31, 2016 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS - continued #103 PATHS & TRAILS Revenues Motor Vehicle Fuel (Gas) Tax Investment interest Total revenues Expenditures Miscellaneous Capital Outlay Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning fund balance Ending fund balance Budget Year Elapsed = 2016 41.7% 2016 Budget Actual May Actual thru Budget May 31 Remaining % of Budget 8,500 703 2,687 (5,813) 31.61% 0 12 48 48 0.00% 8,500 715 2,735 (5,765) 32.17% 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% o 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 8,500 715 2,735 (5,765) 38,054 38,054 46,554 40,789 #104 - TOURISM FACILITIES HOTELIMOTEL TAX FUND Revenues Tourism Fac cities Hotel/Motel Tax Investment Interest Total revenues Expenditures Capital Expenditures Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning fund balance Ending fund balance #105 - HOTEL / MOTEL TAX FUND Revenues Hotel/Motel Tax Investment Interest Total revenues 357,500 0 34,158 94,942 (262,558) 26.56% 85 296 296 0.00% 357,500 34,244 95,238 (262.262) 26.64% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 357,500 34,244 95,238 (262,262) 182,347 182,347 539.847 277,585 550,000 52,551 146,541 (403,459) 26.64% 300 100 333 33 110.90% 550,300 52,650 146,873 (403,427) 26.69% Expenditures Interfund Transfers - #001 3U,000 0 0 30,000 0.00% Tourism Promotion 499,350 13,638 88,572 410,778 17.74% Transfers out - #309 (Browns Park volleyball Court. 60,650 0 0 60,650 0.00% Total expenditures 590,000 13,638 88,572 501,428 15.01% Revenues over (unCer) expenditures (39.700) 39,013 58,301 (904,854) Beginning fund balance 208,702 208,702 Ending fund balance 169,002 267,003 Page 9 P:1FinancelFinance Activity ReportslCouncil Monthly Reports1201612016 05 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Five -Month Period Ended May 31, 2016 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS - continued #106 - SOLID WASTE Revenues Sunshine Administrative Fee Grant Proceeds Total revenues Budget Year Elapsed = 2016 41.7% 2016 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget % of May May 31 Remaining Budget 125,000 0 31,250 93,750 25.00% 53,500 0 15,415 38,084 28.81°1 178,500 0 46,666 131,834 26.14% Expenditures Interfund Transfers - #001 40,425 0 13,475 Education & Contract Administration 138,075 11,445 13,960 26,950 33.3314 124,115 10.11% Total expenditures 178,500 11,445 27,435 Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 (11,445) 19,231 Beginning fund balance 42,874 42,874 Ending fund balance 42,874 62,105 #107 - PEG FUND Revenues Comcast PEG Contribution 151,065 15,37% (19,231) 90,000 0 19,984 70,016 22.20% Total revenues 90,000 0 19,984 70,016 22.20% Expenditures PEG Reimburse - CMN 117,000 0 11,817 105,183 10.10°/a PEG COSV Broadcast 37,500 0 11,637 25,863 31.03% Total expenditures 154,500 0 23,453 131,047 15.18% Revenues over (under) expenditures (64,500) 0 (3,470) (51,030) Beginning fund balance 301,182 301,182 Ending fund balance 236,682 297,712 #120 - CENTER PLACE OPERATING RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest Interfund Transfer Total revenues Expenditures Operations Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning fund balance Ending fund balance 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 Page 10 P;IFinance\Finance Activity Reparts\Council Monthly Reports12016t2016 05 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Five -Month Period Ended May 31, 2016 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS - continued Budget Year Elapsed = 2016 41.7% 2016 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget % of May May 31 Remaining Budget #121 - SERVICE LEVEL STABILIZATION RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest Interfund Transfer Total revenues Expenditures Operations Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning fund balance Ending fund balance #'122 - WINTER WEATHER RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest Interfund Transfer 6,500 0 1,622 0 6,534 0 34 100.52% 0 0.00% 6,500 1,622 6,534 34 100.52% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 6,500 1,622 6,534 34 5,461, 789 5,461,789 5,468,289 5,468,323 600 157 634 34 105.62% 0 0 0 0 0.00% Subtotal revenues 600 157 634 34 105.62% Expenditures Snow removal expenses 500,000 0 0 500,000 0.00% Total expenditures 500,000 0 0 500,000 0.00% Revenues over (under) expenditures (499,400) 157 634 (499,966) Beginning fund balance 444,472 444,472 Ending fund balance (54,928) 445,106 #123 - CIVIC FACILITIES REPLACEMENT FUND Revenues Investment Interest. Interfund Transfer - #001 700 173 696 (4) 99.39% 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total revenues 700 173 696 (4) 99.39% Expenditures Transfers out - #311 (pavement preservation) 559,786 3 186,595 373,191 33.33% Total expenditures 559,786 0 186,595 373,191 33.334 Revenues over (under) expenditures (559,086) 173 (185,900) (373,195) Beginning fund balance 559,108 559,108 Ending fund balance 22 373,209 Page 11 P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Repartst201612016 05 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Five -Month Period Ended May 31, 2016 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS #204 - DEBT SERVICE FUND Revenues Spokane Public Facilities District Intel -Fund Transfer -in - #001 lnterfund Transfer -in - #301 lnterfund Transfer -in - #302 Total revenues Budget. Year Elapsed = 2016 41.7% 2016 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget %p of May May 31 Remaining Budget 380,300 97,650 97,650 (282,650) 25.68% 198,734 0 0 (198,734) 0.00% 83,400 0 27,800 (55,600) 33.33% 83,400 0 27,800 (55,600) 33.33% 745,834 97,650 153,250 (592.584) 20.55% Expenditures Debt Service Payrnents - CenterPlace 380,300 97,650 97,650 282,650 25.68% Debt Service Payments - Roads 166,800 18,400 18,400 148,400 11,03% Debt Service Payments -'16 LTGO Bond 198,734 0 0 198,734 0.00% Total expenditures 745,834 116,050 116,050 629,784 15.56% Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 (18,400) 37,200 (1,222,368) Beginning fund balance 4,049 4,049 Ending fund balance 4,049 41,249 Page 12 P:IFinance\Finance Activity ReportslCouncil Monthly Reports1201612016 05 31.xisx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Five -Month Period Ended May 31, 2016 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS Budget Year Elapsed = 2016 41.7% 2016 Budget Actual May Actual thru Budget May 31 Remaining % of Budget #301 - CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues REET 1 -Taxes 800,000 80,495 307,161 (492,839) 38.40% Investment Interest 1,000 308 1,223 223 122,31% Total revenues Expenditures Interfund Transfer -out -#204 83,400 9 27,800 55,600 33.33% Interfund Transfer -out - #303 222,503 0 2,599 219,904 1.17% Interfund Transfer -out - #311 (pavement preseri 365,286 0 0 365,286 0.00% Total expenditures 671,189 9 30,399 640,790 4.53% Revenues over (under) expenditures 129,811 80,803 277,984 (1,133,406) Beginning fund balance 1,594,088 1,594,088 Ending fund balance 1,723,899 1,872,072 801,000 80,803 308,384 (492,616) 38.50% #302 SPECIAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues REET 2 - Taxes 800,000 80,495 307,161 (492,839) 38.40% investment Interest 1,000 346 1,377 377 137.66% Total revenues 801,000 80,841 308,537 (492,463) 38.52% Expenditures Interfund Transfer -out - #204 83,400 0 27,800 55,600 33.33% lnterfundTransfer-out-#303 922,816 0 4,778 918,038 0.52% Interfund Transfer -out - #311 (pavement presen 365,286 0 0 365,286 0.00% Total expenditures 1,371.502 0 32,578 1.338,924 2.38 Revenues over (under) expenditures (570,502) 80,841 275,959 (1,831,387) Beginning fund balance 1,728,297 1,728,297 Ending fund balance 1,157,795 2,004,257 Page 13 P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201612016 05 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Five -Month Period Ended May 31, 2016 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS - continued Budget Year Elapsed = 2016 41.7% 2016 Budget Actual May Actual thru Budget May 31 Remaining % of Budget #303 STREET CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 5,797,263 0 503,005 (8,294,258) 5.72% Developer Contribution 314,700 0 0 (314,700) 0.00% Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0.00% Transfer -in -#301 222,503 0 2,599 (219,904) 1.17% Transfer -in -#302 922,816 0 4,778 (918,038) 0.52% Transfer -in -#312 Pines Underpass 500,000 0 0 (500,000) 0.00% Transfer -in -#312 Sullivan Rd W Bridge 1,010,509 0 90,114 (920,395) 8.92% Investment Interest 0 7 29 29 0.00% Total rever.ues 11,767,791 7 600,525 (11,167,266) 5.10% Expenditures 060 Argonne Rd 'Corridor Upgrade SRTC 06-31 0 0 4,355 (4,355) 0.00% 123 Mission Ave -Flora to Barker 332,566 1,087 16,897 315,669 5.08% 141 Sullivan & Euclid PCC 1,981,060 8,058 11,068 1,969,992 0.56% 142 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan 0 9,514 17,459 (17,459) 0.00% 149 Sidewalk Infill 5,000 0 105 4,895 2.10% 155 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement 5,237,650 131,153 986,705 4,250,945 18.84% 156 Mansfield Ave. Connection 5,000 3 513 4,487 10.27% 166 Pines Rd. (SR27) & Grace Ave. Int. Safety 491,331 464 87,038 404,293 17.71% 167 Citywide Safety Improvements 228,127 13,091 35,471 192,656 15.55% 201 ITS Infill Project Phase 1 (PE Start 2014) 271,357 8,645 32,619 238,738 12.02% 206 Sprague/Long Sidewalk Project 5,000 3 235 4,765 4.71% 207 Indiana & Evergreen Transit Access 0 823 17,807 (17,807) 0.00% 221 McDonald Rd Diet (16th to Mission) 559,200 1,224 69,489 489,711 12.43%❑ 222 Citywide Reflective Signal Backplates 40,500 3 0 40,500 0.00% 223 Pines Rd Underpass @ BNSF & Trent 500,000 0 0 500,000 0.00% 234 Seth Woodard Sidewalk Improvements 361,000 7,210 14,072 346,928 3.90% 238 Pines RD Mirabeau Parkway intersection 0 4,505 31,347 (31,347) 0.00% 239 Bowdish Rd Si 11tH Ave. Sidewalk 0 2,651 5,883 (5,883) 0.00% xxx Maribeau Pkway & Pines 350,000 3 0 350,000 0.00% xxx Bowdish Sidewalk 8th to 12th 400,000 0 0 400,000 0.00% Construction - Small Works 0 0 0 0 0.00% Contingency 1,000,000 0 0 1,000,000 0.00% Total expenditures 11,767,791 188,428 1,331,064 10,436,727 11.31% Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 (188,421) (730,538) (21,603,993) Beginning fund balance 75,538 75,538 Ending fund balance 75,538 (655,001) Note: Work performed in the Street Capital Projects Fund for preservation projects is for items such as sidewalk upgrades that were bid with the pavement preservation work. Page 14 P:1Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201612016 05 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Five -Month Period Ended May 31, 2016 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS - continued Budget Year Elapsed 2016 41.7% 2016 Budget Actual May Actual thru Budget May 31 Remairing % of Budget 4309 - PARKS CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 90,000 0 443 (89,557) 0.49% Interfund Transfer -in - #001 200,300 0 53,333 (146,967) 26.63% Interfund Transfer -in - 4105 (Browns Volleyball Cc. 60,650 0 0 (60,650) 0.00% Interfund Transfer -in #312 (Appleway Trail) 14,050 0 0 (14,050) 0.00% Investment Interest 500 153 618 118 123.64% Total revenues 365,500 153 54,395 (311,105) 14.88% Expenditures 176 Appleway Trail - University to Pines 0 0 872 (872) 0.00% 225 Pocket dog park 0 0 379 (379) 0.00% 227 Appleway Trail - Pines to Evergree 104,050 4,823 8,681 95,369 8.34% 237 ApplewayTrail - Sullivan to Corbin 0 1,150 3,039 (3,039) 0.00% 241 Valley Mission Dog Park - Phase II 81,300 150 5,550 75,750 6.83% 242 Browns Park Splashpad 116,500 6,652 6,652 109,848 5.71% 243 Browns Park Volleyball Court 60,650 5,416 5,416 55,234 8.93% 244 COSV Park Signs - Phase II 20,500 0 284 20,217 1.38% xxx City entry sign 70,000 0 0 70,000 0.00% Total expenditures 453,000 18,191 30,873 422,127 6.82% Revenues over (under) expenditures (87,500) (18,038) 23,522 (733,232) Beginning fund balance 98,461 98,461 Ending fund balance 16,961 121,982 #310 - CIVIC FACILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Investment Interest 1,200 368 1,484 284 123.63% Interfund Transfer -in - #001 - Future C.H. Bondi 72,500 0 24,167 (48,333) 33.33% Interfund Transfer -in - #001 - Future C.H. O&M 271,700 0 90,567 Total reverues 345,400 368 116,217 (48,050) 33.65% Expenditures Transfers out - #001 (Lease pymt in excess ofbonc 198,734 0 0 198,734 0.00% Professional Services 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 198,734 0 0 198,734 0.00% Revenues over (under) expenditures 146,666 368 116,217 (246,784) Beginning fund balance 1,182,548 1,182,548 Ending fund balance 1,329,214 1,298,765 Note: The fund balance includes $839,265.10 paid by the Library District for 2.82 acres el the Balfour Park site. If the District does not succeed in getting a voted bond approved by October 2017 then the City may repurchase this and at the original sale price of $839,2,35.10. Page 15 P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201612016 05 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Five -Month Period Ended May 31, 2016 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS - continued Budget Year Elapsed = 2016 41.7% 2016 Budget Actual May Actual thru Budget May 31 Remairing % of Budget 4311 - STREET CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 2011+ Revenues interfund Transfers in- #001 943,800 0 314,600 (629,200) 33.33% Interfund Transfers in- #101 67,342 0 22,447 (44,895) 33.33% Interfund Transfers in -#123 559,786 0 186,595 (373,191) 33.33% Interfund Transfers in -#301 365,286 0 0 (365,286) 0.00% Interfund Trnsfers in- #302 365,286 0 0 (365,286) 0.00% Grant Proceeds 0 0 7,129 7,129 0.00% Investment Interest 0 640 2,578 2,578 0.00% Total revenues 2,301,500 640 533,349 (1,768,151) 23.17% Expenditures Pre -Project GeoTech Services 50,000 0 0 50,000 0.00% Pavement. Preservation 3,000,000 0 0 3,000,000 0.00% 188 Sullivan Rd Preservation Project 0 0 144 (144) 0.00% 211 Sullivan Trent to Wellesley 0 0 299 (299) 0.00% 218 Montgomery Ave Street Preservation 0 0 120 (120) 0.00% 220 Houk-Sinto-Maxwell Street Preservation 0 0 45 (45) 0.00% 221 McDonald Road Diet 0 4.243 16,056 (16,056) 0.00% 226 Appieway Resurfacing Park to Dishman 0 6,499 25,294 (25,294) 0.00% 229 32nd Ave Preservation 0 2,101 14,278 (14,278) 0.00% 233 Broadway Ave St Presery - Sulky to Moore 0 3,490 21,678 (21,678) 0.0D% 235 NB Sullivan Rd Pres 0 140 1,174 (1,174) 0.00% 240 Saitese Road Preservation 0 0 15,557 (15,557) 0.00% Total expenditures 3,050,000 16,472 94,646 2,955,354 3.10% Revenues over (under) expenditures (748,500) (15,832) 438,703 (4,723,504) Beginning fund balance 2,605,219 2,605,219 Ending fund balance 1,856,719 3,043,922 #312 - CAPITAL RESERVE FUND Revenues Transfers in - #001 ('14 Fund Bar a 50%) Investment Interest Total rever ues 1,828,723 0 0 0 (1,828,723) 7 0 0 0,00% 0.00% 1,828,723 3 0 (1,828,723) 0.00% Expenditures Transfers out - #303 - Sullivan Rd W Bridge 1,010,509 3 90,114 920,395 8.92% Transfers out - #303 - Pines Rd Underpass 500,000 0 0 500,000 0.00% Transfers out - #309 - Appieway Trail (Pines to E 14,050 0 0 14,050 0.00% Total expenditures 1,524,559 0 90,114 1,43L,445 5.91% Revenues over (under) expenditures 304,164 D (90,114) (3,263,168) Beginning fund balance 4,576,597 4,576,597 Ending fund balance 4,880,761 4,486,483 #313 - CITY HALL CONSTRUCTION FUND Revenues 2016 LTGO Bond Proceeds - Par Value 2016 LTGO Bond Proceeds - Premium 7,275,000 671,088 0 0 7,275,000 0 0 671,088 0.00% 0.00% Total revenues 7,946,088 0 0 7,946,088 Expenditures Capital Outlay - City Hall 12,649,405 112,966 484,401 12,165,004 2016 LTGO Bond Issue Costs 96,515 0 0 96,515 0.00% 3.83% 0.00% Total expenditures 12,745,920 112,966 484,401 12,261,519 Revenues over(under)expenditures (4,799,832) (112,966) (484,401) (4,315,431) Beginning fund balance 4,800,627 4,800,627 Ending fund balance 795 4,316,225 Page 16 3.80% P:1FinancelFinance.Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201612016 05 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Five -Month Period Ended May 31, 2016 ENTERPRISE FUNDS #402 - STORMWATER FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Budget Year Elapsed = 2016 41.7% 2016 Budget Actual May Actual thru Budget May 31 Remaining % of Budget Revenues Stormwater Management Fees 1,870,000 707,420 861,205 (1,008,795) 46.05% Investment Interest 1,500 463 1,867 367 124.47% Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total Recurring Revenues 1,871,500 707,863 863,072 (1,006,428) 46.12% Expenditures Wages / Benefits 1 Payroll Taxes 514,132 33,450 176,576 337,556 34.34% Supplies 15,900 1,225 6,566 9,334 41.29% Services & Charges 1,113,683 85,441 263,993 849,690 23.70% Intergovernmental Payments 67,000 0 14,885 52,115 22.22% Vehicle Rentals -#501 11,000 0 0 11,000 0.00% Interfund Transfers -out - #001 13,400 0 4,467 3,933 33.33% Total Recurring Expenditures 1,735,115 120,115 466,487 1,268,629 26.89% Recurring Revenues Over (Under) Recurring Expenditures 136,385 587,788 396,586 260,201 NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Grant Proceeds 175,000 0 0 (175.000) 0.00% Developer Contributions 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Revenues 175,000 0 0 (175,000) 0.00% Expenditures Capital - various projects 751,100 55 0 751,100 0,00% Maintenance Facility Storage Unit 5,000 0 0 5,000 0.00% 193 Effectiveness Study 0 6,190 7,299 (7,299) 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 756,100 6,245 7,299 748,801 0.97% Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (581,100) (6,245) (7,299) 573,801 Excess (Deficit) of -otal Revenues Over (Under] Total Expenditures (444,715) 581,522 389,287 834,002 Beginning working capital 1,896,925 1,896,925 Ending working capital 1,452,210 2,286,212 Note: Work performed in the Stormwafer Fund for preservation projects is Ibr stormwater improvements that were bid with the pavement preservation work. Page 17 P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201612016 05 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Five -Month Period Ended May 31, 2016 ENTERPRISE FUNDS - continued Budget Year Elapsed 2016 41.7% 2016 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget % of May May 31 Remaining Budget #403 - AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA Revenues Spokane County 500,000 0 0 (500,000) 0.00% Grant DOE - Sprague Park to University LID 1,500,000 0 0 (1,500,000) 0.00% Grant revenue 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total revenues Expenditures 198 Sprague Park to University LID Tota[ expenditures 2,000,000 0 0 (2,000,000) 0.00% 2,000,000 0 0 2,000,000 0.00% 2,000,000 Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 Beginning working capital 921,660 Ending working capital 0 0 0 2,000,000 0 (4,000,000) 921,660 921,660 921,660 Page 18 0.00% P; 1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201612016 05 31.xisx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Five -Month Period Ended May 31, 2016 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Budget Year 2016 Elapsed = 41.7% 2016 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget % of May May 31 Remaining Budget #501 - ER&R FUND Revenues Transfer -in -#001 24,000 0 8,000 (16,000) 33.33% Transfer -in -#101 31,000 0 10,333 (20,667) 33.33% Transfer -in -#101 (plow replace) 40,000 0 13,333 (26,667) 33.33% Transfer -in -#402 11.000 0 3,667 (7,333) 33.33% Investment Interest 1,000 274 1,102 102 110.21% Total revenues 107,000 274 36,435 (70,565) 34.05% Expenditures Vehicle Acquisitions 105,000 26,271 26,271 78,729 25.02% Snow Plow Replacement 225,000 0 0 225,000 0.00% Total expenditures 330,000 26,271 26,271 303,729 7.96% Revenues over (under) expenditures (223,000) (25,998) 10,164 (374,293) Beginning working capital 1,248,997 1,248,997 Ending working capital 1,025,997 1,259,161 #502 - RISK MANAGEMENT FUND Revenues Investment Interest 0 2 6 6 0.00% Interfund Transfer - #101 0 3 0 0 0.00% Interfund Transfer - #001 325,000 0 108,333 (216,667) 33.33%Q Total revenues 325,000 2 108,340 (216,660) 33.34% Expenditures Auto & Property Insurance 325,000 Unemployment Claims 0 Miscellaneous 0 Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning working capital Ending working cap tal 0 0 277,298 47,702 85.32%a 2.012 (2,012) 0.00% 0 0 0.00%a 325,000 0 279,310 45,690 85.94% 0 194,383 194,383 2 (170,971) (262,350) 194,383 23,412 SUMMARY FOR ALL FUNDS Total of Revenues for all Funds 76,892,423 8,354,901 20,517,942 Per revenue status report 76,892,423 8,354,901 20,517,943 Difference 0 0 (0) Total of Expenditures for all Funds Per expenditure status report 86.258,267 3,920,932 18,848,378 86,258,267 3,920,932 18,848.378 0 0 (0) Total Capital expenditures (included in total expenditures) 31,317,077 362,424 2,068,607 Page 19 P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201612016 05 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Investment Report For the Five -Month Period Ended May 31, 2016 6/1012016 Beginning $ 44,889,995.93 $ 3,008,993.33 $ 2,002,501.62 $ 49,901,490.88 Deposits 2,119,143.57 0.00 0.00 2,119,143.57 Withdrawls 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Interest 16,196.83 0.00 0.00 16,196.83 Ending $ 47,025,336.33 $ 3,008,993.33 $ 2,002,501.62 $ 52,036,831.28 001 General Fund 101 Street Fund 103 Trails & Paths 104 Tourism Facilities Hotel/Motel 105 Hotel/Motel 120 CenterFlace Operating Reserve 121 Service Level Stabilization Reserve 122 Winter Weather Reserve 123 Civic Facilities Replacement 301 Capital Projects 302 Special Capital Projects 303 Street Capital Projects Fund 304 Mirabeau Point Project 307 Capital Grants Fund 309 Parks Capital Project 310 Civic Buildings Capital Projects 311 Pavemert Preservation 312 Capital Reserve Fund 402 Stormwater Management 403 Aquifer Protection Fund 501 Equipment Rental & Replacement 502 Risk Management `Local Government Investment Pool matures: 6/28/2016 11/4/2016 rate: 0.40% 0.50% Balance Earnings Budget Total LGIP* BB CD 2 BB CD 3 Investments Beginning $ 44,889,995.93 $ 3,008,993.33 $ 2,002,501.62 $ 49,901,490.88 Deposits 2,119,143.57 0.00 0.00 2,119,143.57 Withdrawls 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Interest 16,196.83 0.00 0.00 16,196.83 Ending $ 47,025,336.33 $ 3,008,993.33 $ 2,002,501.62 $ 52,036,831.28 001 General Fund 101 Street Fund 103 Trails & Paths 104 Tourism Facilities Hotel/Motel 105 Hotel/Motel 120 CenterFlace Operating Reserve 121 Service Level Stabilization Reserve 122 Winter Weather Reserve 123 Civic Facilities Replacement 301 Capital Projects 302 Special Capital Projects 303 Street Capital Projects Fund 304 Mirabeau Point Project 307 Capital Grants Fund 309 Parks Capital Project 310 Civic Buildings Capital Projects 311 Pavemert Preservation 312 Capital Reserve Fund 402 Stormwater Management 403 Aquifer Protection Fund 501 Equipment Rental & Replacement 502 Risk Management `Local Government Investment Pool matures: 6/28/2016 11/4/2016 rate: 0.40% 0.50% Balance Earnings Budget Current Period' Year to date $ 34,764,122.24 $ 10,913.96 $ 47,272.74 $ 45,000.00 1,838,145.65 572.14 2,007.18 3,000.00 38,962.88 12.13 47.62 0.00 277,584.53 86.40 296.33 0.00 320, 569.81 99.78 332.69 300.00 300, 000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,209,534.43 1,621.50 6,533.51 6,500,00 505,316.99 157.28 633.74 600.00 554,738.91 172.67 695.73 700.00 989,177.55 307.89 1,223.13 1.000.00 1,111, 547.93 345.98 1,376.60 1,000.00 22,930.79 7.14 28.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 492,913.22 153.42 618.18 500.00 1,182,917.24 368.19 1,483.56 1,200.00 2,055,775.05 639.87 2,578,24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,488,703.93 463.37 1,867.06 1,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 878, 771.18 273.52 1,102.11 1,000.00 5,118.95 1.59 6.42 0.00 $ 52,036,831.28 $ 16,196.83 $ 68,103.60 $ 62,300.00 Page 20 P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201512016 05 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Sales Tax Receipts For the Five -Month Period Ended May 31, 201E Month Received 2015 6/10/2016 Difference 2016 $ ala February 1,962,820.56 2,109,906.28 147,085.72 7,49% March 1,358,307.78 1,488,699.93 130,392.15 9.60% April 1,401,618.35 1,555,221.97 153,603.62 10.96% May 1,655,903.08 1,852,586.82 196,683.74 11.88% 6,378,649.77 June 1,557,740.48 July 1,886,262.22 August 1,944,085.56 September 1,894,514.58 October 1,765,807.42 November 1.836,885.94 December 1,683,925.38 January 1,633,949.35 20,581,820.70 7,006,415.00 7,006,415.00 627,765.23 9.84% Sales tax receipts reported here reflect remittances for general sales tax, criminal justice sales tax and public safety tax. The sales tax rate for retail sales transacted within the boundaries of the City of Spokane Valley is 8.7%. The tax that is paid by a purchaser at the point of safe is remitted by the vendor to the Washington State Department of Revenue who then remits the taxes back to the various agencies that have imposed the tax. The allocation of the total 8.7°/° tax rate to the agencies is as follows: - State of Washington 6.50% - City of Spokane Valley 0.85% - Spokane County 0.15% - Spokane Public Facilities District 0.10% - Criminal Justice 0,10% - Public Safety 0,10% * 2.20% local tax - Juvenile Jail 0.10% - Mental Health 0.10% - Law Enforcement Communications 0.10% * - Spokane Transit Authority 0.60% * 8.70% Indicates voter approved sales taxes In addition to the .85% reported above that the City receives, we also receive a portion of the Criminal Justice and Public Safety sales taxes. The distribution of those taxes is computed as follows: Criminal Justice: The tax is assessed county -wide and of the total collected, the State distributes 10% of the receipts to Spokane County, with the remainder allocated on a per capita basis to the County and the cities within the County. Public Safety: The tax is assessed county -wide and of the total collected, the State distributes 60% of the receipts to Spokane County, with the remainder allocated on a per capita basis to the cities within the County. Page 21 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Sales Tax Collections - April For the years 2007 through 2016 January February March April P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Tax RevenuelSales Tax120161sales tax collections 2016.xlsx 2007 1 2008 1 2009 2010 1 2011 { 2012 1 2013 2014 1 2015 1 2016 1,759,531 1,729,680 1,484,350 1,491,059 1,460,548 1,589,887 1,671,269 1,677,887 1,732,299 1,155,947 1,129,765 1,098, 575 963,749 990,157 1,009,389 1,133,347 1,170,640 1,197,323 1,196,575 1,219,611 1,068, 811 1,018,468 1,015, 762 1,067,733 1,148,486 1,201,991 1,235,252 1,479,603 1,423,459 1,134, 552 1,184,137 1,284,180 1,277,621 1,358,834 1,448,539 1,462,096 1,863,225 1,316.682 1,378,300 1,640,913 5/24/2016 2016 to 2015 Difference 130,926 7.56% 119,359 9.97% 143,048 11.58% 178,817 12.23% Collected to date 5,591,656 5,502,515 4,786,288 4,657,413 4,750,647 4,944,630 5,311,936 5,499,057 5,626,970 6,199,120 572,150 10.17% May 1,353,013 1,243,259 1,098,054 1,102,523 1,187,737 1,174,962 1,320,449 1,400,956 1,373,710 0 June 1,428,868 1,386,908 1,151,772 1,123,907 1,248,218 1,290, 976 1,389,802 1,462,558 1,693,461 0 July 1,579,586 1,519,846 1,309,401 1,260,873 1,332.834 1,302,706 1,424,243 1,545,052 1,718,428 0 August 1,516,324 1,377,943 1,212,531 1,211.450 1,279,500 1,299,678 1,465,563 1,575,371 1,684,700 0 September 1,546,705 1,364,963 1,227,813 1,191,558 1,294,403 1,383,123 1,466,148 1,552,736 1,563,950 0 October 1,601,038 1,344,217 1,236,493 1,269,505 1.291,217 1,358,533 1,439,321 1,594, 503 1,618,821 0 November 1,443,843 1.292,327 1,155.647 1.139,058 1,217,933 1,349,580 1,362,021 1,426,254 1,487,624 0 December 1,376,434 1,129,050 1,070,245 1.141,012 1,247,920 1,323,189 1,408,134 1,383,596 1,441,904 0 Total Collections 17,437,467 16,161,028 14,248,244 14,097,299 14,850,409 15,427,377 16,587,617 17,440,083 18,209,568 6,199,120 Budget Estimate 17,466,800 17,115,800 17,860,000 14,410,000 14,210,000 14,210,000 15,250,000 16,990,000 17,628,400 18,480,500 Actual over (under) budg (29,333) (954,772) (3,611,756) (312,701) 640,409 1,217,377 1,337,617 450,083 581,168 (12,281,380) Total actual collections as a % of total budget 99.83% 94.42% 79,78% 97.83% 104.51% 108.57% 108,77% 102.65% 103.30% n/a % change in annual total collected 5.36% (7.32%) (11.84%) (1.06%) 5.34% 3.89% 7.52% 5.14% 4.41% n/a % of budget collected through April 32,01% 32,15% 26.80% 32.32% 33.43% 34.80% 34.83% 32.37% 31.92% 33.54% % of actual total collected through April 32.07% 34.05% 33.59% 33.04% 31.99% 32,05% 32.02% 31.53% 30.90% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of April 7,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 0 i 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 April 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 a April March rE February January Page 22 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Hotel/Motel Tax Receipts through - April Actual for the years 2007 through 2016 January February March April P:1FinancelFlnance Activity ReportslTax RevenuelLodging Tax120161105 hotel motel tax 2016.xlsx 2007 1 2008 f 200s 1 2010 f 2011 2012 J 2013 1 2014 1 2015 1 2016 25,137.92 28,946.96 25,310.66 24.623.06 29,190.35 27,509.99 37,950.53 40,406.02 23,280.21 23,283.95 25,272.02 36,253.63 22,706.96 22,212.21 21,442.32 23.416.94 22,792.14 21,548.82 24,232.35 24,611.28 25.654.64 39,463.49 38.230.49 52,130.37 24,184.84 25,974.98 27,738.65 40,979.25 25,425.40 26,013.62 29,383.93 48,245.81 27,092.20 31,887.27 27,111.00 27,773.00 32,998.14 34,330.23 50,454.72 52,550.60 Total Collections 117.589.46 121,486.03 108,089.81 109,819.74 107,846.12 120,776.15 118,877.72 129,068.76 137,656.06 146,541.10 May 31,371.01 36,828.53 32,588.80 34,683.32 33,790.69 37,478.44 40,560.41 41,122.66 44,283.17 0.00 June 36,267.07 46,659.88 40,414.59 39,935.36 41.403.41 43,970.70 47,850.15 52,617.63 56,975.00 0.00 July 56,281.99 50,421.37 43,950.26 47,385.18 49,311.97 52,818.60 56,157.26 61,514.48 61,808.87 0.00 August 51,120.70 50,818.35 50,146.56 54,922.99 57,451.68 57,229.23 63,816.45 70,383.93 72,696.67 0.00 September 57,260.34 60,711.89 50,817.62 59,418.96 58,908.16 64,298.70 70,794.09 76.099.59 74,051.29 0.00 October 43,989.74 38,290.46 36,784.36 41,272.35 39,028.08 43,698.90 43,835.57 45,604.07 49,879.71 0.00 November 36,340.64 35,582.59 34,054.79 34,329.78 37,339.36 39,301.22 42,542.13 39,600.06 42,376.17 0.00 December 31,377.41 26,290.11 27,131.43 26,776.84 32,523.19 30,432.13 34,238.37 33.256.28 41,509.90 0.00 Total Collections 461,578.36 467,089.21 423,978.22 448,544.52 457,602.66 490,004.07 518,672.15 549,267.46 581,236.84 146,541.10 Budget Estimate 400,000.00 400,000.00 512,000.00 380,000.00 480,000.00 430.000.00 490,000.00 530,000.00 550,000.00 550,000.00 Actual over (under) budg 61,578.36 67,089.21 (88,021.78) 68,544.52 (22.397.34) 60,004.07 28,672.15 19,267.46 31,236.84 (403,455.90) Total actual collections as a % of total budget 115.39% 116.77% 82.81% 118.04% 95.33% 113.95% 105.85% 103.64% 105.68% nia % change in annual total collected 10.67% 1.19% (9.23%) 5.79% 2.02% 7 08% 5.85% 5.90% 5.82% nta % of budget collected through April 29.40% 30.37% 21.11% 28.90% 22.47% 28.09°l0 24.26% 24.35% 25.03% 26.64% % of actual total collected through April 25.48% 26.01 % 25.49% 24.48% 23.57% 24.65% 22.92% 23.50% 23.68% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of April 160,000.00 140,000.00 120,000.00 100,000.00 80,000.00 60,000.00 40,000.00 20,000.00 0.00 2007 2008 2009 2010 April 6/12/2016 2016 to 2015 Difference 4,795 17.70% 662 2,44% 1,332 4.04% 2,096 4.15% 8,885.04 6.45% 3 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 • April March • February ■ January Page 23 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA lst and 2nd 14% REET Collections through April Actual for the years 2007 through 2016 January February March April P:1FinancelFinance Activity RepartslTax RevenuelREET120161301 and 302 REET for 2016.xlsx 2007 2008 2009 2010 1 2011 2012 1 2013 f 2014 2015 L 2016 228,896.76 145,963.47 129,919.79 159, 503.34 263, 8 34.60 133,513.35 211,787.08 128,366.69 55,281.25 45,180.53 73,306.86 81,155.83 59,887.08 64,121.61 86,204.41 99,507,19 64,128,13 36,443.36 95,879.78 79,681.38 46,358.75 56,114.56 71,729.67 86,537,14 56,898.40 155,226.07 72,171.53 90,376.91 61,191.55 67,048.50 81,723.70 105448.15 96,140.79 103,507.94 165,867.91 236,521.17 104,446.46 83,583.39 265,301.85 205,654,44 6/12/2016 2016 to 2015 Difference 8306 8.64% (19,925) (19.25%) 99.434 59.95% (30,867) (13.05%) Collected to date 834,438.23 567,346.85 254.92447 309,720.29 276,132.65 260,740.12 374,672.91 315,411.90 602,037.81 658,986,14 56,948.33 9.46% May 222,677.17 158,506.43 77,463.58 109,624.89 124,691.60 111,627.22 116,164.91 198,869.74 165,748.39 0.00 June 257,477.05 178,202.98 105,020.98 105,680.28 81,579.34 124,976.28 139,112.11 106,675.77 347,420.87 0.00 July 323,945.47 217,942.98 122,530.36 84,834.48 79,629.06 101,048.69 128,921.02 208,199.38 217,374.58 0.00 August 208,039.87 133,905.93 115,829.68 72,630.27 129,4 7 2.44 106,517.19 117,149.90 172,536.46 202,525.05 0.00 September 165,287,21 131,240.36 93,862.17 75,812.10 58.0.-w .83 63,516.73 174,070.25 152,322.59 179,849.27 0.00 October 206,442.92 355,655.60 113,960.52 93,256.02 61,396.23 238,094.79 117,805.76 123,504.75 128,832.69 0.00 November 191,805.53 147,875.00 133,264.84 72,021.24 74,752.72 104,885.99 78,324.02 172,226.74 129,869.62 0.00 December 179,567.77 96,086.00 71,365.60 38,724.50 65,077,29 74,299.65 75,429.19 117,681.62 157,919.41 0.00 Total distributed by Spokane County 2,589,681.22 1,986,762.13 1,088,222.20 962,304.07 960,751.16 1,185,708.66 1,321,650.07 1.567,428.95 2,131,577.69 658,986.14 Budget estimate 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 760,000.00 800,000.00 950,000.00 1,000,000.00 1.200.000.00 1,600,000.00 1,600,000.00 Actual over (under) budget 589,681.22 (13,237.87) (911,777.80) 202,304.07 160,751.16 235,706.66 321,650.07 367,428.95 531,577.69 (941,013.86) Total actual collections as a % of total budget 129.48% 99.34% 54.41% 128.62% 120.09% 124.81% 132.17% 130.62% 133.22% n/a % change in annual total collected 5.22% (23.28%) (45.23%) (11.57%) (0.16%) 23.41% 11.47% 18.60% 35.99% nla % of budget collected through April 41.72% 26.37% 12.75°% 40.75% 34.52% 27.45% 37.47% 26.28% 37.63% 41.19% % of actual total collected through April 32.22% 28.56% 23.43% 32.19% 28.74% 21.99% 28.35% 20.12°1 28.24% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of April 900,000.00 800, 000.00 700,000.00 600, 000.00 500,000.00 400,000.00 300,000.00 200,000.00 100,000.00 0.00 April 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 ra April r March • February *January Page 24 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Debt Capacity\201.6\debt capacity 201G.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Debt Capacity 2015 Assessed Value for 2016 Property Taxes 7,748,275,097 Voted (UTGO) Nonvoted (LTGO) Voted park Voted utility 1.00% of assessed value 1.50% of assessed value 2.50% of assessed value 2.50% of assessed value Maximum Outstanding Remaining Debt as of Debt % Capacity 12/31/2015 Capacity Utilized 77,482, 751 116,224,126 193,706,877 193,706,877 581,120,631 O 77,482,751 13,650,000 102,574,126 O 193,706,877 O 193,706,877 13,650,000 567,470,631 0.00% 11.74% 0.00% 0.00% 2.35% Bonds Repaid 2014 LTGO Bonds 12/1/2014 12/1/2015 225,000 135,000 360,000 175,000 125,000 300,000 0 360,000 0 300,000 400,000 260,000 660,000 0 660,000 12/1/2016 185,000 130,000 315,000 75,000 390,000 12/1/2017 190,000 130,000 320,000 150,000 470,000 12/1/2018 230,000 135,000 365,000 155,000 520,000 12/1/2019 255,000 140,000 395,000 160,000 555,000 12/1/2020 290,000 140,000 430,000 165,000 595,000 12/1/2021 320,000 145,000 465,000 170,000 635,000 12/1/2022 350,000 150,000 500,000 175,000 675,000 12/1/2023 390,000 155,000 545,000 180,000 725,000 12/1/2024 430,000 0 430,000 185,000 615,000 12/1/2025 465,000 0 465,000 195,000 660,000 12/1/2026 505,000 0 505,000 200,000 705,000 12/1/2027 395,000 0 395,000 205,000 600,000 12/1/2028 300,000 0 300,000 215,000 515,000 12/1/2029 245,000 0 245,000 220,000 465,000 12/1/2030 225,000 0 225,000 225,000 450,000 Bonds 12/1/2031 180,000 0 180,000 235,000 415,000 Remaining 12/1/2032 130,000 0 130,000 240,000 370,000 12/1/2033 165,000 0 165,000 250,000 415,000 12/1/2034 0 0 0 260,000 260,000 12/1/2035 0 0 0 270,000 270,000 12/1/2036 0 0 0 280,000 280,000 12/1/2037 0 0 0 290,000 290,000 12/1/2038 0 0 0 305,000 305,000 12/1/2039 0 0 0 315,000 315,000 12/1/2040 0 0 0 330,000 330,000 12/1/2041 0 0 0 340,000 340,000 12/1/2042 0 0 0 355.000 355,000 12/1/2043 0 0 0 365,000 365,000 12/1/2044 0 0 0 375,000 375,000 12/1/2045 0 0 0 390,000 390,000 5,250,000 1,125,000 6,375,000 7,275, 000 13,650,000 5,650,000 1,385,000 7,035,000 7,275, 000 14,310,000 Page 25 6/12/2016 Road & LTGO Bonds Period Street 2016 LTGO Grand Ending CenterPlace Improvements Total Bonds Total 12/1/2014 12/1/2015 225,000 135,000 360,000 175,000 125,000 300,000 0 360,000 0 300,000 400,000 260,000 660,000 0 660,000 12/1/2016 185,000 130,000 315,000 75,000 390,000 12/1/2017 190,000 130,000 320,000 150,000 470,000 12/1/2018 230,000 135,000 365,000 155,000 520,000 12/1/2019 255,000 140,000 395,000 160,000 555,000 12/1/2020 290,000 140,000 430,000 165,000 595,000 12/1/2021 320,000 145,000 465,000 170,000 635,000 12/1/2022 350,000 150,000 500,000 175,000 675,000 12/1/2023 390,000 155,000 545,000 180,000 725,000 12/1/2024 430,000 0 430,000 185,000 615,000 12/1/2025 465,000 0 465,000 195,000 660,000 12/1/2026 505,000 0 505,000 200,000 705,000 12/1/2027 395,000 0 395,000 205,000 600,000 12/1/2028 300,000 0 300,000 215,000 515,000 12/1/2029 245,000 0 245,000 220,000 465,000 12/1/2030 225,000 0 225,000 225,000 450,000 Bonds 12/1/2031 180,000 0 180,000 235,000 415,000 Remaining 12/1/2032 130,000 0 130,000 240,000 370,000 12/1/2033 165,000 0 165,000 250,000 415,000 12/1/2034 0 0 0 260,000 260,000 12/1/2035 0 0 0 270,000 270,000 12/1/2036 0 0 0 280,000 280,000 12/1/2037 0 0 0 290,000 290,000 12/1/2038 0 0 0 305,000 305,000 12/1/2039 0 0 0 315,000 315,000 12/1/2040 0 0 0 330,000 330,000 12/1/2041 0 0 0 340,000 340,000 12/1/2042 0 0 0 355.000 355,000 12/1/2043 0 0 0 365,000 365,000 12/1/2044 0 0 0 375,000 375,000 12/1/2045 0 0 0 390,000 390,000 5,250,000 1,125,000 6,375,000 7,275, 000 13,650,000 5,650,000 1,385,000 7,035,000 7,275, 000 14,310,000 Page 25 6/12/2016 P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Tax RevenuelMVi=T12016\motor vehicle fuel tax collections 2016.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Motor Fuel (Gas) Tax Collections - April For the years 2007 through 2016 January February March April 2007 1 2008 1 2009 [ 2010 2011 2012 1 2013 1 2014 € 2015 1 2016 172,711 162,079 156,194 175,010 165,698 149,799 159,316 165,574 133,304 155,832 146,264 161,117 161,298 145,869 140,486 161,721 154,792 146,353 141,849 165,019 159,607 135,208 144.297 153,546 146,145 145,998 135,695 156,529 152,906 148,118 131,247 156,269 152,598 145,455 140,999 157,994 163,918 163,037 145,537 167,304 6/12/2016 2016 to 2015 Difference 0,4 11,320 7.42% 17,582 12.09% 4,538 3.22% 9,310 5.89% Collected to date 665,994 640,387 596,517 609,374 608,013 592,658 584,367 588,540 597,046 639,796 42,750 7.18% May 173,475 162,281 156,109 158,119 154,700 144,670 151,595 156,850 156,259 0 June 183,410 176,085 173,954 168,146 158,351 159,827 167,479 161,965 164,872 0 July 178,857 166,823 169,756 164,221 165,398 160,565 155,348 157,805 168,205 0 August 183,815 171,690 179,012 176,869 153,361 164,050 173,983 172,308 186,277 0 September 191,884 176,912 175,965 175,067 173,820 171,651 195,397 173,299 174,505 0 October 180,570 165,842 163,644 164,475 158,889 153,022 133,441 160,539 161,520 0 November 181,764 193,360 167,340 168,477 160,461 162,324 164,303 165,871 181,771 0 December 159,750 142,230 144,376 143,257 124,714 138,223 142,140 141,298 153,338 0 Total Collections 2,099,519 1,995,610 1,926,673 1,928,005 1,857,707 1,846,990 1,868,053 1,878,475 1,943,793 639,796 Budget Estimate 2,000,000 2,150,000 2,050,000 1,900,000 1,875,000 1.897,800 1,861,100 1,858,600 1,858,600 2,004,900 Actual over (under) budg 99,519 (154,390) (123,327) 28,005 (17,293) (50,810) 6,953 19,875 85,193 (1,365,104) Total actual collections as a % of total budget 104.98% 92.82% 93.98% 101.47% 99.08% 97.32% 100.37% 101.07% 104.58% n/a % change in annual total collected 6.25% (4.95%) (3.45%) 0.07% (3.65%) (0.58%) 1.14% 0.56% 3.48% n/a % of budget collected through April 33.30% 29.79% 29.10% 32.07% 32.43% 31.23% 31.40% 31.67% 32.12% 31.91% % of actual total collected through April 31.72% 32.09% 30.96% 31.61% 32.73% 32.09% 31.28% 31.33% 30.72% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of April 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 April 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 a April March in February sr January Page 26 P:1FinancelFinance Activity ReportslTax RevenuelTelephone Tax120161telephone utility tax collections 2016.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Telephone Utility Tax Collections - April For the years 2009 through 2016 January February March April 2009 2010 1 2011 1 2012 1 2013 1 2014 1 2015 j 2016 128,354 282,773 230,721 275,775 234,622 266,041 264,175 254.984 241,357 230,366 245,539 238,561 193,818 261,074 234,113 229,565 217,478 216.552 223,884 214,618 210,777 205,953 208,206 206,038 177,948 212.845 174,738 214,431 182,167 173.971 177,209 171,770 6/9/2016 2016 to 2015 Difference $ 4�4 4,219 2,37% (38.874) (18.26%) 2,471 1.41% (42,661) (19.89%) Collected to date 917,623 1,019,822 955,823 918,570 872,532 830,974 779,962 705,117 (74,845) (9.60%) May 242.115 255,056 236,985 227,469 129,270 210,010 187,856 0 June 239,334 251,880 239,013 234,542 293,668 210,289 187,412 0 July 269,631 250,593 244,191 226,118 213,078 205,651 190,984 0 August 260,408 246,261 349,669 228,789 211.929 205,645 185,172 0 September 249,380 240,111 241,476 227,042 210,602 199,193 183,351 0 October 252,388 238,500 237,111 225,735 205,559 183,767 183,739 0 November 254,819 247,848 240,246 225,319 212,947 213,454 175,235 0 December 368,775 236,065 236,449 221,883 213,097 202,077 183,472 0 Total Collections 3,054,473 2,986,136 2,980,963 2,735,467 2,562,682 2,461,060 2,257,183 705,117 Budget Estimate 2,500,000 2,800,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 2,900,000 2,750,000 2,565,100 2,340,000 Actual over (under) budg 554,473 186,136 (19,037) (264,533) (337,318) (288,940) (307,917) (1,634,883) Total actual collections as a % of total budget 122.18% 106.65% 99,37% 91.18% 88.37% 89.49% 88.00% n/a % change in annual total collected n/a (2.24%) (0.17%) (8.24%) (6.32%) (3.97%) (8.28%) are % of budget collected through April 36.70% 36.42% 31.86% 30.62% 30.09% 30.22% 30.41% 30.13% % of actual total collected through April 30.04% 34.15% 32.06% 33.58% 34.05% 33,76% 34.55% nla Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of April 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 2009 2010 2011 April 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 April March ■ February u January Page 27 Rick V nLeuven Chic of Police Spo De Spokane Valley Police Department r' c a'L'rl]Ledt SItir.. .S'e?Ti:;cr.spr•OVicfer fr7 f.artiit'l.'.: ria ,.i ,rfr the Spokane ('(:P (nr the (a')Nwriiltfiv. Dedicrrfrrr CJT.I.ic KIICY_O i icJ, Sheriff TO: Mark Calhoun, Deputy City IIr] im.gcr FROM: Rick VanLeuven, Chief of Police DATE: June 20, 2016 RE: Monthly Report May 2016 May 2016: May 2015: CAD incidents: 5,fl ' I CAD incidents: 5,079 Reports taken: 1,800 Reports taken: 1,816 Traffic stops: Pr, Traffic stops: 848 Traffic reports: .'r} Traffic reports: 269 CAD incidents indicate ca115 Cor sc.rv'ice as well as self -initiated officer corti;t, ts. Hot spot maps are attached showing May burglaries, txaffic collisions, vehickt prowlings, and stolen vehicles, Also attached are trend -line graphs for 2013, 2014, 2015 and 20l r): ('i'; iHoa;is. Spr}kane Valley Dispatched Calls, Self -Initiated Calls, Collisions; Persons Crimes, Crimes, and Sex Crimes. Also included is the May Crimes by Cities stats report, This i el,Ort reflects incidents that occ i red ira a specific city to which a deputy from Spokane County (oI: the c ark :v roport. For cxarzi:)lc, an individual may have had his car stolen in Airway Heights, and he waled until he honk., in the Newman Lake area to make a report. In 2011, we switched from UCR to NIBRS classification. As a result. certain crimes we: -c. _'rokcn down to their violation parts for NIBRS and each par-( is now counted, irup triii certain crimes before 2011 to crimes during or after 201 i is n;;t reCOmt-nc3 cicC tbc _:t1'1 ;. 1 hi crimes that are impacted by the NIBRS classification changes that Hor i:v carat,),rrrL-d r::. l:{,r graphs include: Adult Rape, Assault, l'argory ADMINISTRATIVE: In early May, Chief VanLeuva:n traveled to Seattle to attend the MINA I.ti'te�nti :;trot. ci Conference. The guest speaker was Retired Newtown Police Chief Mike ICehoe who presented a detailed synol-'-:i.s of the tragic events that took place at Sandy Hook Elementary, which left 20 first Page 1 graders 1! :1 `1\ 5t 7 f 11I.17i1't".r I;la;li�� :i>l L:t1 l �'l l'13ilh:i 1-tl, 2012. Chief} _elic'' iilltit'!15 t'il i•fler_ttloi.rt[ challenges, how they dealt k ith the atternia[h el` the ieee '. _.. in -Learing for mass ; t: n elli.ti_ end strategics for 3z7Lt-t.31 I:c i[th preparcdness hefare and alter a criLi . Chief VanLeuven along with others from the Spokane r,llcy Police Depareneei .tt[ net:l the Annual Law Enforcement Appreciation Break:"asI ;r[ Faith Bible Churcle 110s•ecl he the Shie-iI s Chaplain's Office_ Later in the. morning, hie attendle t the 2.1Y1 Annual Memorial Service for Law Enforcement at the Courthouse Courtyard - Chief A:Artl_t:oven gave opening remarks at the Northwest Gang Investigators Nee ion Annual, Conference held at Northern Quest. The conference covered a wide range of crenne: l ,y.EL:L :. nl�°,ltt by recognized experts in the field of street gangs and related topics. The third week of May, brought the Annual Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs S1 PC) {:onlieen:e, held in Kennewick, WA!zl:il- tr}n- Chke-t:iI.ettven and Sheriff Knezovich attended the evert. l'he Accreditation Con-irriiltec; Oi Whielt t.in�° �:n7l.cLi et7 is a member, met during the conference to consider a handful of law eriforcemeni to became accredited. Spoleaue 'Valley Police earned their accreditation in 2011 and retic cceditiitic•n in 2015. Greater Spokane Emergency Management (GSEM) hosted the Naval Post Graduate School in Spokane as part of the Homeland Security Executive Education program in mid-May, which Chief VanrLeuven attended. In coordination with members of the Emergency Manageenzent Operations Group, the four-hour seminar focused on a Bakken Crude railcar accident, addressing aspects of notification, response, and recovery. The GSEM is the coordinating agency during major emergencies and dieters for citizens, response partners, and elected and senior officials. This includes synchronizing communication flow between federal, state and local governments, including local agencies and the citizens of the Greater Spokane area. In addition, GSEM helps facilitate community preparedness, response and recovery efforts, and provides public education on a vatiety of emergency related topics. SHERIFF'S COMMIJNTTY op. IEATED POLICING EFFORT (SCOPE): In the month of May. S.C,O.P.E, partici! a1,24 in: • Spokane Val i,c °, t.`ity "[ell :' the Mel. • 'Walking School Bus -- Seth` ooddrd Elementary Sch'.H'I • QCD Build a Bike �' •R2nt • Fire District 8 — Opcer House • Safe Kids Campaign __ University Elementary School 4 1,aw Enforcement Appreciation y I r::.al w fast • Ti Scouts Bike Rndce —Hope I.,.ul,_e-seri Church • kii.e.ele' safety Training at Rro. clway ['.1..!13L1].::n-y School Page 2 • • 6 4 b a Bicycle Safety Training at Green Acres Elementary School National Bike to School Day — Broadway Elementary School Safe Kids Coalition Meeting (ic}odGuides Mentoring 4 'VI -IS Fast !galley Cornmunii',' Coalition \-leeting Crime Stoppers 11••'It't`13:-w. C ,:+:t1ieiot3 l .uiri I,Y' 11 ) May 2016 Volunteers Hours per Station *Includes servici :LJ._r:, l:i1t are provided in a -le City of Spokane Valley. Tlicst two locations cover both Spokane ', .il' ey ,iiid L1,.: •_mi,i..r,r ;,,rik:ci portion of the county. Location # Volunteers 10 trentwood 1 [rii�cr'i[4 \Fest VFa[ c 17 7 tut :iclrrrirt flours L.E. Hours Total Flours (-.2. 9 f1 156.0 308.0 23:.0 5 1.0 789.0 21.0 310.0 0.5 R9.0 289._ 3914. 68.0 439.0 771.07 71.0 7r1.0 0 2 504m5 7.376.5 4. \ .rlu ! { 2=-i 4 per Iinur) $55,936.71 for May 2016 2012 0 2016 5 2 t _ Feb. 19arti Apcil May .1urte July Aug. Sept- Oct. Nov Dec. 7 13 9 4 16 [i 5 8 1 7 7 30 14 3 4 10 9 7 13 5 12 4 fir Total 257 6 1 12 6 7 2 7 92 97 1) f, 1 i tl *l,Ytl;iv l!:1,h S.C.OEP.E. Incident Response Team (SIRT) volunteers contributed 50 on -scene hours (including travel time) in May, responding to crime scenes, motor vehicle accidents and providing traffic control; 5 hours were for incidents specifically in Spokane Valley. There were no Special Events in Spokane Valley in May. Total May volunteer hours contributed by SIRT, including training, stand- by, response and special events is 652; total for 2016 is 2,696, Abandoned vehicles tagged by S.C.O.P.E. volunteers for impoundment in Spokane Valley it April totaled 27 and in May totaled 19 with 6 vehicles in April ,<rl i 6 in May, respectively, c 'entually cited and towed. Fourteen hulks were processed in April :in•:.:3 hulks processed in May. I)Llring the month of May, atotal o!' I :.{ hic.l .,.`ere proces,a.' : total '016 is 400. Page SCOPE LATENT PRINT STATS SCOPE DISABLED PARKING ACTIVITY REPORT TIINING HOURS SCSO SVPD TOTAL Jai ivary" 0 29 36 65 February 4.5 21 39 60 March 0 23 20 43 April 0 29 37 66 May 0 29 35 64 YTD - TOTAL 4.5 131 167 298 SCOPE DISABLED PARKING ACTIVITY REPORT City of Saokarie Valley # of Vol. 4 of Vol. 4 of Hrs. # of Disabled Infractions Issued ff of Warnings Issued # of Non - Disabled Infractions hsued January 2 11 2 0 0 February 2 1.5 2 0 0 March 2 53 4 0 0 April 3 60 $ 0 0 May 2 53 7 0 0 YTD Total 11 178.5 23 0 0 Spokane _Conn # of Vol. 4 of Hrs. 4 of Disabled Iufracrions issued 4 of Warnings Issued 4 of Non - Disabled Infractions Issued January 2 26 .5 2 0 0 February 2 18 0 0 0 March 1 16 1 10 0 April 2 115 0 0 0 May 2 15 1 0 0 YTD Total 9 190.5 4 10 0 OPERATIONS; Deputies Serve Search Warrant to Locate Wanted Felon — In early May at approximately 9:30 p.m.; Spokane Valley Sheriff's Deputy James Wang learned a 45-year-o}lei male had a valid felony warrant for his arrest and. he was inside a residence located in the 500 block of North Dartmouth in Spokane Valley. Additional deputies arrived at the location to set up a perimeter while Deputy Wang contacted a male who lures at the residence. The male would not allow deputies to enter his residence and search for the wanted suspect. Several K9 announcements for the male suspect to surrender went unanswered. Deputy Wang requested a search warrant to enter the residence, based on his probable cause to believe the suspect was inside. At approximately 11:00 p.m., deputies (Page 4 ~Fayed the signed search warrant at the residence. A deputy stayed with the roommate, who was unable to leave the residence, as deputies began searching for the suspect with the assistance of K9 1.510 and Corporal Thurman. As the search reached the basement, an additional K9 announcement was made informing the male suspect that K9 Laslo would be used to locate him if he did not l Lrrendc_, and, if located, K9 Laslo would bite him. This time, the suspect announced himself and surrendered without incident. He was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for his felony warrant for Promoting Prostitution 2"s Degree. Hieo Armed Robbery Suspects Arrested — In raid -May, at approximately 3:40 a.m., Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputies responded to an Armed Robbery at Hico Village located at 1201 N. Barker Road in. Spokane Valley. Witnesses stated two while males entered the store with handguns and demanded cigarettes and money. The suspects, who had their faces covered, fled the location on foot after the employee complied with their demands. Suspect 41 was described as a white reale, 5'11", wearing a grey "hcodie", shorts and possibly has reddish, :`frizzy" hair. Suspect #2 was described as a white male, 6'00", approximately 220 lbs, wearing a black shirt, vest and cowboy hat, blue jeans and dark boots. Initial reports were that the suspects fled on foot, but may be associated with a dark colored SUV, possibly a dark green or black Jeep Cherokee or Ford Explorer. During this robbery, the suspects displayed and pointed their weapons at the employee and were considered dangerous. In late May, Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputies, Major Crimes Detectives and SWAT Team served a search warrant at a residence in the 17500 block of East Indiana in Spokane Valley. The search warrant was granted after Major Crimes Detective Darin Staley developed information to identify one of the suspects as an 18 -year-old male. Detective Staley, working with the store owner, and with tips received after the media coverage of the surveillance video was aired, pieced together the information to identify and arrest the male suspect. At approximately 5:45 a.rn., SWAT Team members served the search warrant at the male's residence on Indiana and successfully took him into custody without incident_ At approximately 10:20 a.m., the second suspect in the robbery, a 13 -year- old male juvenile, was taken into custody without incident at a residence in the 18600 block of East Bridgeport, by Major Crimes Detectives. Detectives recovered multiple firearms, to include a Ruger ,44 Magnum Super Blackhawk and a Clock 32 .357, believed to be used in the robbery as well as clothing the suspects wore. The adult shale suspect was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for Robbery 1s' Degree. The juvenile was transported and booked into the Spokane County Detention Facility for Robbery 15` Degree. A total of five adults and two children were successfully removed from the residence, unharmed, including the suspect. One male suspect, who is a convicted felon and unable to lawfully possess a firearm, was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for two counts of Assault 2'd Degree and l.'7ilaww ftil Possc;w ior, of a Firearm. Intoxicated, Armed Driver Leaves Scene after Colliding with a Mailbox and Fire Hydrant - In mid-May, at approximately 230 a.rn,, Spokane Valley Sheriff's Deputies responded to a vehicle collision with a mailbox and fire hydrant in the area of the 200 block of South Custer in Spokane. Valley. The 31. -year-old male driver reportedly left the vehicle while it was still rolling and was walking away from the scene. Sergeant Justin Elliott located the abandon Cadillac STS the male was driving in the 4800 block of East 3rd. Deputy Clay Hilton contacted the male suspect, who appeared to be intoxicated, walking on 2nd near Chronicle. Deputy Hilton checked the suspect's name through the computer and was informed he had a confirmed felony, Department of Corrections (DOC) Escape warrant for his arrest. When Deputy Hilton took the male; suspect into custody for the warrant, he located a loaded omen handgun in the suspect's right shorts pocket and a Cadillac key fob, money and marijuana in his left. A further check of the suspect's criminal history showed he is a convicted felon (Assault 1s' & Burglary 2"`t) making it illegal for hire to possess a firearm. The key Page 5 lob wen later determined to be from the involved Cadillac. Deputy Todd Milan r ineesagetad die hit and run culle;inn scene and confirmed the suspect was the only person in the eel.. 1 ie dcacrriia_ccl the Cadillac veaa tee e chu ug the wrong way on 3'd, hit a mailbox, drove tlhe:me,l i a yard and hit a lire hydrant cousin_, . (7 Ir:siderable amount of damage. The suspect was treneeoreel and booked into the apcikarie Creamy Jai! for Unlawful Possession of a Firearm 1'1 Degree, I ruder the Influence Alcohol/Drage 1 lit ATI LI Run -Unattended and his felony DOC warrant. Male Shot after Suspect Asks about Gang Affiliation — In late May, at approximately 1:45 a.m., Spnkarie Valley Sheriff's Deputies responded to Valley Hospital's Emergency Room for the report o ! a patient who was reporting he was punched and then shot in the leg while he was walking, in the area of 600 North Vista Road in Spokane Valley. 'file 47 -year-old victim stated he was walking eel La on Dick Road when a male dressed in all red approached him. The victim said the suspect him if he was affiliated with a gang. The victim denied being in a gang, but believes he was targeted because he was wearing all blue clothing. The suspect hit the victim a couple times, knocking his blue Seattle Mariners baseball cap off. The victim was able to gel away from the suspect who tried to get him to return for the baseball hat. The victim refused and continued to walk away. The victim heard the suspect whistle, which led the victim to believe the suspect was summoning additional people. As the victim continued walking, a vehicle pulled up and he heard gunshots. The victim said the suspect who hit him was a passenger in the vehicle and was now shooting at him. The victim said he fell to the ground after being hit in the leg as the vehicle fled the scene. Deputies made centact with the occupants of a residence in the area they believed the suspect may have come from, but the victim could not identify anyone as being involved. The victim was treated and released after receiving treatment for the wound to his lower leg. The incident is being investigated by the Spokane Regional Safe Streets Task Force, which is comprised of investigators from the Spokane County Sheriffs Office, Spokane Valley Police Department, Spokane Police Department, Washington Mate Patrol, Washington State Department of Corrections and the FDI. The SRSSTF is an FSI -sponsored task force working to alleviate the criminal activities of gangs, violent criminals and upper-level drug traffickers. Crime Stoppers of the Inland Northwest is offering a cash reward of up to $1,000 for anyone providing information leading to an arrest in this shooting. Persons with information can call the Grime Stoppers Tip Line at 1 -800 -222 -TIPS, or submit the tip via the Internet website http:/?www.crimestoppersinlandnorthwest.org. Tipsters do not have to give their name to collect the cash reward. Crime Stoppers of the Inland Northwest is a civilian organization that promotes public safety by paying cash rewards for information that solves crimes It is not affiliated with law enforc.cment. Full Disclosure of reward requirements is available at http:Jwww.crirnestoppersinlandnorthwestorg. K9 Gunnar Nabs Suspect after He Crashes Stolen Motorcycle - Spokane Valley Sheriff's K9 Deputy Hunt and his partner IC9 Gunnar located a suspect who fled on a stolen motorcycle and later on foot after he crashed in the area of the 6800 block of East 4(h Avci i Lie in Spokane Valley. The 36 - year -old driver was booked into jail for Attempting to Elude Law lt:nI..'recnicni and Possession of a Stolen Motor Vehicle. In late May, at approximately 7:15 p.m., Spokane_ Valley Sheriff's Deputy K9 Deputy Jason Hunt observed a motorcycle weaving in and out of traffic without using a turn signal as it traveled south on Argonne from Indiana. Deputy Hunt caught up as the motorcycle traveled east on Mission from Mullan. When the suspect turned south on Locust, he looked back over his shoulder at Deputy Hunt's marked patrol vehicle before rapidl'r ztccelerating to approximately 7D mph_ Due to the suspect's reckless driving, Deputy Hunt actin tctl his emergency lights and siren, but he continued to flee; he continued to try and evade capterc he traveled between 50-70 mph only, slowing as he approached intersections. As the stuspeet attempted to negotiate a turn from 41h Avenue Page 6 to go northbound on Elizabeth, he lost control and crashed. The male suspect stood up and began running west through yards with Deputy Hunt, K9 Gunnar and Deputy Hairston giving chase_ Several K9 warnings were made infommang the suspect that if he didn't stop, a K9 would be used. The male suspect fled down the alley and turned north on Bradley out of view. With the suspect's continued effort to evade arrest, Deputy Hunt released K9 Gunnar. K9 Gunnar contacted the suspect who was partially concealed under a parked SUV, trying to hide. The male suspect , 1cm ted to get K9 Gunnar to release his hold by hitting K9 Gunnar, but quickly complied with 7.•puty I-Iunt's commands to show his hands_ He was taken into custody without further �n:ident. Deputies checked the motorcycle and learned it had been reported stolen. The suspect later said he fled because he thought he had a misdemeanor warrant for his arrest. He claimed he didn't How the motorcycle was stolen, saying that some `dirt bag tweaker" male left it at his house and he 'bought it would be fun to ride. The male suspect was booked into the Spokane County Jail for : tlempting to Elude Law Enforcement and Possession of a Stolen Motor Vehicle. Suspect Flees and Tries to Ram a Deputy's Patrol Car - During a pursuit in late May, a 42 -year- old male suspect tried to ram a Deputy's patrol car as he fled from a traffic stop. After the vehicle pursuit, he fled on foot and later surrendered after K9 Laslo tracked him to a residence in the 200 block of South Chronicle in Spokane Valley. The ir,ale suspect was charged with two felonies, three misdemeanors, and a Department of Corrections Community Custody Hold. In late May, at approximately 11:15 p.m., Spokane Valley Sheriff s Deputy Justin Palmer stopped a vehicle occupied by a male driver and female passenger in the area of McKinnon and 3`d Avenue for expired license plate tabs. The male driver, initially verbally identified himself using his brother's name, stated he was waiting for an emissions test before getting a current registration. Deputy Palmer checked the name the male initially provided and found that person's driving status was suspended_ Deputy Palmer re -approached the male suspect and informed him he was under arrest for DWLS 3'd and told him to exit the vehicle. Instead of exiting the vehicle, the suspect quickly put the vehicle into drive, spinning the tires as he fled. With no pedestrian and very little vehicular traffic, Deputy Palmer and Deputy Getchell, who arrived to assist, pursued the male suspect. At one point, the suspect turned into a dirt, dead-end driveway in the 4700 block of East 1st Avenue. The male stopped the vehicle before reaching the dead-end, shifted into reverse and drove directly at Deputy Palmer's vehicle. Deputy Palmer quickly maneuvered his patrol car out of the way of the suspect's vehicle, avoiding a collision. In the arca of 3rd Avenue and Chronicle, Deputy Palmer attempted to try a NT (Pursuit Immunization Technique) maneuver to safely end the pursuit but as he moved into position, the suspect swerved sharply toward the patrol vehicle causing Deputy Palmer to swerve to avoid another collision. The male continued to try and evade both deputies before stopping his vehicle in the middle of the road on 2"d Avenue, leaving his female passenger in the car as he fled an foot. A perimeter was quickly established and K9 announcements were made as Corporal Thurman and his partner K9 .Laslo arrived to attempt to locate the suspect. K9 Lada began his track at the suspect's last known location and led Corporal Thurman to the backyard of a residence in the area of the 200 block of South Chronicle and straight to the backdoor. PA announcements where given advising the male suspect to surrender, which he eventually followed. He was taken into custody without further incident; he was not injurcJ dui Lliis incident. His adult female passenger stated she had neck and hack pain due to the susp. 1 ` i e(e less driving. The suspect was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for Attcirupt-r,, to Elude, Assault 3rd Degree, Resisting Arrest, Obstructing a Public Officer, Driving While uspended and for a Department of Corrections Community Hold. Page 7 Deputies Called to an Assault where a Shot was Fired —Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputies res15ended to a report of an assault where one shot had been fired at an apartment complex in the -eelp.e block of East 411. in Spokane Valley. The suspects fled the scene and the ..iiLtiei sustained minor injuries during the altercation. In late May, at approximately 1:25 a.m., Spy:kzttiw Valley Sheriffs Deputies arrived at the apartment complex and contacted the victim who hid soinc cuts and aberrations, hutdeclined medical assistance at the scene. The victim stated he heard someone pounding on the door of his apartment. He looked through the peephole and could not see anyone so he opened the door. Immediately two black males rushed the door and tried to push the victim back into his apartment. The victim pushed back and all three ended up falling down the stairs. A fight ensued and the suspects fled the scene toward the parking lot. The victim said he heard one gun shot from the area of the parking lot as the suspects left. The victim said the suspects were wearing masks and doesn't believe he has seen there before. He told deputies he doesn't have any enemies and doesn't know anyone who would have done this, He described the suspects as black males, wearing dark clothing with dark masks covering their faces. A search of the area by a K9 Unit was unsuccessful. A small silver sedan was seen leaving the area at the time of this incident but it is not. clear if the vehicle was involved. Spokane Valley Major Crimes Detectives are investigating this incident. Anyone with information regarding this incident is urged to call Crime Check at 509-456- 2233. Suspect Arrested for Four Counts of Indecent Exposure; Sexual Assault Detectives Believe .°1 cl ditional Victims Possible — In late May, Spokane County Sheriffs Office Sexual Assault t :lit Detectives arrested a 46 -year-old male for four counts of Indecent Exposure. Detectives be, investigating several reports of lewd conduct where an older white male was exposing I,i n. Lf and masturbating in front of juveniles and adults over the past several months in okane Valley and Spokane City_ Investigators developed enough evidence to charge the male :s:o: pect in four of these cases, Detectives believe there may be additional victims who have not reported incidents or have not been identified. Detectives are releasing his photo with the hope i;iv additional victims or witnesses will come forward as they continue to investigate these incidents. No specific vehicle description will be provided as the male has access to several (MIL UCTIt vehicles and may have used any one of them. Anyone with information regarding this investigation. 01 anyone who has been victimized by the male suspect, is urged to contact 1)otevtive Stre.lt :o fat (509) 477-3218. ******************** Page 8 sv Crime Report Date Range: 5/1/2016 to 5/31/2016 Year Te Date 'totals: Full Year %tab: .eiarral Intelfgeiiaz Group May -2016 May -2015 2016 -YTD 2015-5171 2015 2014 2013 2012 1511 2010 608GLARY F0RUERY MAL MISCHIEF r,ON,CAIMIN AL PROP OTHER RCRVD VEH STL VEH THEFT VEH CTFIER VEH PROWL TOTAL PROPERTY CRIMES 72 74 390 370 999 1.167 1079 1,030 997 915 44 55 276 253 633 65S 693 627 515 341 141 130 703 681 1.674 1,045 1,624 1,753 1.54a 1,17? 11 9 73 59 134 151 106 108 260 913 116 125 618 626 1,595 1,449 1,463 1,355 2,214 855 39 48 746 165 409 464 531 438 407 293 41 53 254 192 515 573 596 570 515 478 223 236 1,201 1,245 3,089 1096 3,105 2,753 2,407 2,358 19 13 83 84 201 279 268 287 194 3 113 85 499 5413 1,183 1,1% 1,205 1.160 1,433 1,395 819 826 4,343 4,178 10A37 10,678 10,670 10,891 9,345 8,731 ASSAULT 112 101 455 455 2,072 I 067 952 891 955 388 D0A/SUICID€ 19 20 119 118 275 222 215 250 208 388 'r4i 73 5B 325 247 696 485 346 402 498 1,141 ,{OMlcIDE 0 0 5 0 2 3 2 2 3 1 K I I) Na 11' 2 1 14 10 28 41 24 16 14 16 h.1FrN1r,. 19 3D 132 151 381 307 258 270 252 289 ha 20 19 76 63 194 138 156 354 124 128 I QRS OTHER 304 312 1.471 1448 3,494 3,203 2,976 2,901 2,372 1,603 rotal!:.l,v 6 4 28 38 9a 94 88 74 59 57 TCL -4-',P SS 8 6. 50 54 111 132 148 212 162 153 TOTAL MAJOR CRIMES 585 553 2,585 2,594 6,338 5,712 5,168 5,171 4,647 4A64 ADULT RAPE 11 6 39 33 60 7C 64 75 62 44 CHILD ABUSE 2 4 14 16 30 42 26 27 56 115 CUSTINTFER 12 21 58 89 197 237 236 190 164 2C6 IND LIQERTY 2 4 7 7 25 29 20 27 17 8 MOLES/CH ID 11 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 18 47 RAH/CHILD 1 4 5 9 14 13 13 13 23 28 RUraawAY 43 41 172 181 449 406 397 510 520 490 5EY O HER 7 1 30 20 66 69 45 37 56 215 SEX REGIS F 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 8 2 1 5.TALIC.N-, 0 3 9 9 16 24 21 24 14 18 SLISPPERSON 50 56 265 259 502 544 440 423 140 215 TOTAL SEX CRIMES 118 140 599 623 1,441 1,494 1.266 1,354 1,287 1,387 13Ru a 27 2.6 133 142 379 336 314 424 511 534 FSU OTHER 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 2 TOTAL 17F 27 26 133 142 379 336 314 424 513 556 RAF'IC 251 269 1,435 1,369 3,476 3,216 3,525 3,957 3.569 3,081 TOTAL TRAFFIC REPORTS 261 269 1,436 1,329 3,476 3,216 3,525 3,957 1569 3,081 TOTAL REPORTS RECEIVED 1,800 1,816 9,196 8,926 72,071 21,456 20,943 20,998 19,361 1.8,199 rbnteti ,31101.D1.6 11:54:17A4M Rpt011 Fa4. 1 al RMS Crimes by Cities (Only incidents handled by Spokane County Sheriff's Office) Date Range: 5/1/2016 to 5/31/2016 Regional lute ligerlce Group 9 AH CH DP FC FF LAH LL ML MW RE SCO SPA SPK 5V WAV TOTALS BURGLARY FORGERY MAL MISCHIEF NON -CRIMINAL PROP OTHER RCRVD VEH STL VEH THEFT VEH OTHER VEH PROWL TOTAL PROPERTY CRIMES o 0 5 C1 1 0 0 2 1 3 90 0 2 72 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 41 0 1 44 O 0 4 0 0 1 0 4 6 2 121 0 1 141 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 3 11 O 0 1 4 0 0 0 7 5 1 81 1 37 116 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 30 0 2 39 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 33 1 5 41 O 0 10 1 0 1 0 4 7 1 163 0 1 223 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 19 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 81 0 0 113 O 0 24 5 3 2 0 17 27 12 662 2 49 819 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 176 89 280 17 253 75 84 411 35 2202 1,622 ASSAULT 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 14 2 0 64 0 14 112 0 208 DOA/SUICIDE 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 34 0 1 19 0 56 DV 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 47 0 1 73 0 126 KIDNAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 4 MENTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 24 0 0 19 0 48 MP 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 ❑ 13 0 0 20 0 36 PERS OTHER 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 14 4 1 229 0 29 304 0 585 ROBBERY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 8 0 12 TEL -HARASS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 8 0 12 TOTAL MAJOR CRIMES 0 0 8 0 0 2 0 37 8 1 421 0 45 565 0 1,087 ADULT RAPE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 11 0 14 CHILD ABUSE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 4 CUST INTFER 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 1 0 12 0 22 IND LIBERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 2 0 6 RAPE/CHILD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 3 RUNAWAY 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 1 43 0 64 SEX OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 7 0 12 SEX REGIS F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 STALKING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 SUSP PERSON 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 36 0 3 50 0 92 TOTAL SEX CRIMES 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 75 1 11 128 0 222 DRUG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 4 27 0 45 TOTAL ITF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 4 27 0 45 TRAFFIC 0 0 3 4 2 0 0 2 9 0 145 0 61 261 0 487 TOTAL TRAFFIC 0 0 3 4 2 0 0 2 9 0 145 0 61 261 0 487 UIBOC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 TOTAL OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 TOTAL REPORTS RECEIVED 0 0 38 9 5 4 0 57 47 13 1,317 3 170 1,801 0 3,464 'rinl"i (:I I(/14]]6 11:1575] A.1.21 Rpt()(Y3 CAD Incidents by Cities (Only incidents handled by Spokane County Sheriff's Office) Date Range: 5/1/2016 to 5/30/2016 AH CH DP FC FF LAH LL ML MW Regional Intelligence Group 9 RF SCO SPA SPK SV WAV TOTALS CAD Incidents 33 197 219 17 7 2 20 249 110 19 3,799 4 629 4,924 0 10,229 Self Initiated Incidents 28 60 119 7 2 0 16 173 29 3 1,218 2 545 1,440 0 3,642 Drug Self Int (Patrol) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 4 0 9 Traffic Stops 8 29 35 1 0 0 6 53 13 2 500 0 196 768 0 1,611 Traffic Stops (ARST/CIT/IN) 0 7 9 0 0 0 3 22 5 0 160 0 60 267 0 533 TS (Warrants) 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 12 0 10 17 0 41 Calls for Service 5 137 100 10 5 2 4 76 81 16 2,581 2 84 3,484 0 6,587 A€arms 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 121 0 2 102 0 233 Accidents 1 4 4 1 0 0 0 0 8 0 147 0 12 200 0 377 Accidents (ARREST/C1T) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 8 0 13 Drug Calls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 15 0 0 40 0 56 DV 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 11 3 1 146 0 5 190 0 362 DUI 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 2 3 0 64 0 2 87 0 163 DUI (Arrest) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 19 0 24 Pursuits 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 Suspicious Activity 5 15 31 0 0 0 1 20 14 2 538 0 35 651 0 1,312 Vehicle Recovered 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 2 29 0 58 911 Abandon Line 0 25 4 4 0 0 0 12 10 0 204 0 10 259 0 528 Shoplifting 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 47 0 49 All Arrests (ARREST/CLT/IN) 5 8 12 3 1 1 3 31 7 1 292 0 82 511 0 957 Crime Check Reports 0 0 13 1 0 0 0 16 18 3 443 1 7 516 0 1,018 Printed 6/10/2016 11:22:20 AM 1. )c,):11 Page 1 a6 1 ilver rick E Bucke e lid WO r 111 Wellesle 'anal 00 Mirabeau Indiana fission a u to S Hartson 29t 4th 6t 370 Io 0.75 1.5 Miles I i I Map Produced: I 0 Jun 2016 'Broad - .1111" 1 v 6th lo.MOM Ein.32nd siI1.ncy rrr, w 40t1 Be11e -rerre 44th orpe i 2016 May Commercial Burglary Hotspots E Eirlid iberty Lake Mission E v Cata1 aa•wa u�tr Vista Sprague 8h Commercial Burglary Low Medium High 1 2 0 3 0 4+ Prepared By: Regional Intelligence Group 9 Spokane County Sheriff Francis lumbia orkg 1st to rpe Residential Burglary Low =Medium High 1 2 0 3 0 4+ 1t 0 0.75 1.5 Miics I r I Map Produced: 10 Jun 2016 2016 May Residential Burglary Hotspots Prepared By: Regional Intelligence Group 9 Spokane County Sheriff Eu�lld riberty Lake 29 I0 37th ] 0.75 1.5 Miles I � i Map Produced: 10 Jun 2016 2016 April & May Stolen Vehicle Hotspots Stolen Vehicles Low Medium -High C; 1 2 0 3 0 4+ Prepared By: Regional Intelligence Group 9 Spokane County Sheriff 32nd 0.75 I r 1 Map Produced: 10 Jun 2016 5 Mild 2016 May Vehicle Prowling Hotspots Vehicle Prowling Low Medium _ Nigh l 2 n 3 Q 4+ Prepared By: Regional Intelligence Group 9 Spokane County Sheriff F5 antis 7 E v �olumbla - , �1 Catalda ntr Esta o 0.75 Map Produced: 10 Jun 2016 1.5 Maes 2016 MayTraffic Collision Hotspots Traffic Collisions x Low Medium Low _ Medium EMI High 2 0 3 C 4+ Prepared By: Regional Intelligence Group 9 Spokane County Sheriff Selected Data for Comparisons RMS Stats/Charts - Spokane Valley 4000 3000 2000 — 1000 Regional intelligence Group 9 Spokane Valley Dispatched Calls January February March April May June July August September October November December 2013 -- 2014 2015 ..�. 2016 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2013 2746 2383 2882 2928 3166 3195 3491 3529 3127 3016 2753 2773 2014 2702 2550 2992 2935 3369 3291 3847 3593 3279 3069 2715 2884 2015 2995 2658 3209 2971 3473 3639 3819 3817 3652 3552 2997 3110 2016 2966 2871 3230 3363 3600 Printed 6110/2016 11:31.38 AM Page 7 of 28 Selected Data for Comparisons RMS Stats/Charts - Spokane Valley 350 300 250 200 150 - 100 50 Regional Intelligence Group 9 Spokane Valley Person Crimes February January March AprrI May June July August September October November December 2613 .--_. 2014 - 2015 - 2016 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2013 223 180 213 256 248 255 278 278 249 243 251 243 2014 270 225 265 273 280 274 335 331 323 286 290 279 2015 301 248 285 261 316 330 348 313 272 272 263 318 2016 306 299 342 275 325 Printed 6/10/2016 11:31:38 AM Rptt}117 Page 16 of 28 Selected Data for Comparisons RMS Stats/Charts - Spokane Valley 1000 800 600 400 200 Regional lnte Iigence Group 9 Spokane Valley Property Crimes January February March April May June July August September October November December 2013 - 2014 ..... 2015 *--•• 2016 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2013 (17 599 729 671 634 634 897 710 095 817 710 689 2014 632 578 758 665 717 706 727 665 755 683 671 778 2015 706 675 644 586 633 636 686 709 700 733 603 787 2016 707 595 651 736 634 Printed 6110/2016 11:31:38 AM l tpt007 Page 17 of 28 Selected Data for Comparisons RMS Stats/Charts - Spokane Valley Spokane Valley Self Initiated Incidents Regional Inteligence Group 9 February January March April May June July August September October November December 2013 ,2014 — 2015 �+ 2016 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2013 1638 1881 2015 1696 1639 1745 2094 1682 1477 1766 1660 1512 2014 2126 1707 1831 1763 1899 1903 2096 1863 1826 1802 1794 1723 2015 1923 1795 2038 2001 1606 1838 1995 2003 1958 1965 1682 1699 2016 2168 1898 1858 1501 1480 Printed 6)10/2016 11:31:38 AM l pt007 Page 20 of 28 Selected Data for Comparisons RMS Stats/Charts - Spokane Valley 50 - 40 30 - 20- 10 0 Regional Inteiligence Group 9 Spokane Valley Crime Sex Crimes February April June August October December January March May July September November January February March April May June July August September October November December 2013 24 23 26 21 44 41 3G 37 32 29 33 38 2014 26 38 41 43 42 25 25 33 34 36 39 33 2015 36 36 26 23 42 27 45 32 22 25 21 29 2016 26 22 27 29 28 2013 2014 2015 2016 Printed 6110/2016 11:31:38 AM kpl007 Page 22 of 28 Selected Data for Comparisons RMS Stats/Charts - Spokane Valley 200 150 100 50 Regional Intelligence Group 9 Spokane Valley Traffic Collisions February January March April May June July August October September November December 2013 2014 W.M. 2015 2016 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2013 120 69 82 79 90 107 87 98 97 76 114 128 2014 100 105 83 65 103 82 93 90 105 112 116 95 2015 105 76 110 102 106 127 100 103 124 90 129 158 2016 132 76 110 111 108 Printed 6/10/2016 11:31:38 AM Rpt007 Page 27 of 28 Selected Data for Comparisons RMS Stats/Charts - Spokane Valley 2000 1500 1000 500 Regional Intelligence Group 9 Charge Count from Tickets: Spokane Valley February January March April May June July August October September November December 2013 — 2014 2015 Rma 2016 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2013 901 1086 1136 995 978 1226 1290 970 757 1078 948 827 2014 1216 1000 917 959 1130 1110 1242 998 1054 843 868 881 2015 985 895 1006 1054 762 843 985 1019 1124 954 825 866 2016 1547 1006 846 672 688 Printed 6110/2016 11:31:38 AM Rpt0O7 Page 28 of 28 Spokane �,. Valleyk PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT May 2016 AGREEMENTS FOR SERVICES ADOPTED AND IN OPERATION * Budget estimates ** Does not include May 2016 — waiting on invoices Contract Name Contractor Contract Amount Total Expended % of Contract Expended Street Maintenance Poe Asphalt $1,366,663.00 $181,505.24 13.28% Street Sweeping AAA Sweeping $490,200.00 $201,471.60 41.10% Storm Drain Cleaning AAA Sweeping $189,990.00 $12,099.68 6.37% Snow Removal Poe Asphalt $70,000.00 $22,444.34 32.06% Landscaping Senske $57,878.00 $15,514.08 26.80% Weed Spraying Spokane Pro Care $19,400.00 $0.00 0.00% Emergency Traffic Control Senske $10,000.00 $508.71 5.09% Litter and Weed Control Geiger Work Crew $60,000.00 $9,325.60 15.54% State Highway Maintenance WSDOT $265,000.00 $111,259.04 41.98% Traffic Signals, Signs, Striping Spokane County $632,000.00 $168,738.99 26.70% Dead Animal Control Brad Southard $20,000.00 $5,115.00 25.58% *Information in bold indicates updates 1 Submitted 100 80 Citizen Requests for Public Works - May 2016 III In Progress Resolved — 60 40 20 0 I M • uuuu •_ Graffit i On City Proper ty _ LI_ _ ■ ■ 1 1 ■ ■ _ _ I_■ Total Reque sts Misc Dead Anima I Remo val Gravel Should ering Illicit Discha rge Landsc aping ROW Report A Pothol e Roadw ay Nazar d I Sign & Signal Reque sts Storm Draina ge/Ero sion Street Sweep ing Traffic Weed contro I Submitted 79 5 6 2 1 2 14 3 8 12 7 4 12 3 In Progress 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Resolved 75 5 6 2 1 2 12 3 8 12 7 4 10 3 *Information in bold indicates updates 1 WASTEWATER Status of the process can be monitored at: http://www.spokaneriver.net/, http://www.ecy.wa.qov/geographic/spokane/spokane river basin.htm, http://www.spokanecounty.orq/utilities/WaterReclamation/content.aspx?c=2224 and http://www.spokaneriverpartners.com/ STREET MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY The following is a summary of Public Works/Contractor maintenance activities in the City of Spokane Valley for May 2016: • AAA Sweeping continued with arterial maintenance sweeping and residential street sweeping. • AAA Sweeping began vectoring drywells, swale inlets and catch basins on arterials. • Geiger Work Crew began mowing dryland grass areas and continued with litter cleanup. • Poe Asphalt continued with shoulder grading, asphalt patches and made numerous concrete repairs throughout the city. • Cracksealing began on arterial and residential roadways. • Pothole patching. STORMWATER UTILITY The following is a summary of Stormwater Utility activities in the City of Spokane Valley for May 2016: • Bid work for small works project located in and around the neighborhood of Bates Road and Rego Ct. • Continued design support of stormwater retrofit possibilities with several CIP street and trail projects. • Continued work on an internal review of the City's Stormwater Program to prepare for probable future audit by the State. • Continued work on various capital improvement projects, (see below). • Continued negotiations with Ecology for the following Grant Agreements: o EW Effectiveness Study Development Phase 2 & 3 ($300,000) o 2015-2017 Biennial Stormwater Capacity Grants ($25,000) *Information in bold indicates updates 2 CAPITAL PROJECTS Olatie ..•" Va11ey Public Works Projects Monthly Summary - Design & Construction May -2016 Street Projects 0141 Sullivan & Euclid PCC 0155 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement#4508 0166 Pines Rd. (SR27) & Grace Ave. Int Safety 0201 ITS Infill Project - Phase 1 0207 Indiana & Evergreen Transit Access Imp 0221 McDonald Rd Diet (16th to Mission) 0234 Seth Woodard Sidewalk Improvements 0236 Fancher Road Bridge #3502 Joint Repair 0239 Bowdish Rd & 11th Ave. Sidewalk Street Preservation Projects 0226 Appleway Resurfacing, Park to Dishman Mi 0229 32nd Ave Preservation Project 0233 Broadway Ave Street Pres-Sulliv to Moore 0235 NB Sullivan Rd. Pres (Spo Rvr-Flora Pit) 0240 Saltese Road Preservation Project Traffic Projects 0167 Citywide Safety Improvements 0222 Citywide Reflective Signal Back Plates 0228 Transportation Management Center Parks Projects 0227 Appleway S.U.P. - Pines to Evergreen 0237 ApplewayTrail- SullivantoCorbin FHWA - STP(U FHWA - BR HSIP FHWA - CMAC STA - FTA/NF HSIP CDBG COSV TIB - SP 01/27/17 06/27/14 04/22/16 06/24/16 03/18/16 05/27/16 06/10/16 02/25/16 06/10/16 FHWA - STP(U 01/02/17 COSV 02/12/16 COSV 05/06/16 COSV tbd COSV 08/05/16 HSIP HSIP COSY 02/17/17 07/18/14 05/13/16 04/15/16 04/01/16 06/17/16 06/24/16 03/10/16 07/01/16 01/02/17 02/26/16 05/20/16 tbd 08/26/16 07/31/15 08/21/15 tbd tbd Local agency work 80 100 95 95 100 99 30 100 60 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12/31/17 10/05/16 10/01/16 12/31/16 12/31/16 12/31/16 12/31/16 06/01/16 12/31/16 90 0 12/31/17 100 0 12/31/16 75 0 12/31/16 33 0 12/31/16 15 0 12/31/16 100 0 100 80 0 96 07/31/16 03/01/19 12/31/15 $ 2,330,475 $ 15,833,333 $ 733,086 $ 327,562 $ 85,000 $ 2,524,104 389,987 160,000 506,342 $ 1,190,000 $ 1,570,000 450,000 65,834 920,000 $ 503,424 $ 81,000 $ 45,000 FHWA - STP(U 09/16/16 10/07/16 90 0 12/31/18 $ 2,134,057 COSV 03/03/17 03/24/17 0 0 12/31/17 $ 2,130,000 Design Bid Estimated Total Project Proposed Open % Complete Construction Project # Design & Construction Projects Funding Ad Date Date PE I CN Completion Cost Street Projects 0141 Sullivan & Euclid PCC 0155 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement#4508 0166 Pines Rd. (SR27) & Grace Ave. Int Safety 0201 ITS Infill Project - Phase 1 0207 Indiana & Evergreen Transit Access Imp 0221 McDonald Rd Diet (16th to Mission) 0234 Seth Woodard Sidewalk Improvements 0236 Fancher Road Bridge #3502 Joint Repair 0239 Bowdish Rd & 11th Ave. Sidewalk Street Preservation Projects 0226 Appleway Resurfacing, Park to Dishman Mi 0229 32nd Ave Preservation Project 0233 Broadway Ave Street Pres-Sulliv to Moore 0235 NB Sullivan Rd. Pres (Spo Rvr-Flora Pit) 0240 Saltese Road Preservation Project Traffic Projects 0167 Citywide Safety Improvements 0222 Citywide Reflective Signal Back Plates 0228 Transportation Management Center Parks Projects 0227 Appleway S.U.P. - Pines to Evergreen 0237 ApplewayTrail- SullivantoCorbin FHWA - STP(U FHWA - BR HSIP FHWA - CMAC STA - FTA/NF HSIP CDBG COSV TIB - SP 01/27/17 06/27/14 04/22/16 06/24/16 03/18/16 05/27/16 06/10/16 02/25/16 06/10/16 FHWA - STP(U 01/02/17 COSV 02/12/16 COSV 05/06/16 COSV tbd COSV 08/05/16 HSIP HSIP COSY 02/17/17 07/18/14 05/13/16 04/15/16 04/01/16 06/17/16 06/24/16 03/10/16 07/01/16 01/02/17 02/26/16 05/20/16 tbd 08/26/16 07/31/15 08/21/15 tbd tbd Local agency work 80 100 95 95 100 99 30 100 60 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12/31/17 10/05/16 10/01/16 12/31/16 12/31/16 12/31/16 12/31/16 06/01/16 12/31/16 90 0 12/31/17 100 0 12/31/16 75 0 12/31/16 33 0 12/31/16 15 0 12/31/16 100 0 100 80 0 96 07/31/16 03/01/19 12/31/15 $ 2,330,475 $ 15,833,333 $ 733,086 $ 327,562 $ 85,000 $ 2,524,104 389,987 160,000 506,342 $ 1,190,000 $ 1,570,000 450,000 65,834 920,000 $ 503,424 $ 81,000 $ 45,000 FHWA - STP(U 09/16/16 10/07/16 90 0 12/31/18 $ 2,134,057 COSV 03/03/17 03/24/17 0 0 12/31/17 $ 2,130,000 Street Projects 0123 Mission Ave - Flora to Barker 0142 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan 0143 Barker Rd/BNSF Grade Separation 0205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvement 0223 Pines Rd Underpass @ BNSF &Trent 0238 Pines RD Mirabeau Parkway Intersection Stormwater Projects 0193 Effectiveness Study 0198 Sprague, Park to University LID 0199 Havana -Yale Diversion 0200 Ponderosa Surface Water Diversion FHWA - STP(U 08/15/15 FHWA - STP(U 08/31/16 FMSIB tbd COSY COSY TIB - UAP 12/31/16 tbd 04/15/16 Dept of Ecology 06/30/17 Dept of Ecology 03/01/18 Dept of Ecology 10/31/16 Dept of Ecology 10/31/16 *Information in bold indicates updates 3 15 90 0 5 0 90 50 30 35 35 $ 917,700 $ 276,301 $ 720,000 $ 51,619 $ 10,000 $ 446,338 300,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Design Total Project Complete % Complete Project # Design Only Projects Funding Date PE Cost Street Projects 0123 Mission Ave - Flora to Barker 0142 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan 0143 Barker Rd/BNSF Grade Separation 0205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvement 0223 Pines Rd Underpass @ BNSF &Trent 0238 Pines RD Mirabeau Parkway Intersection Stormwater Projects 0193 Effectiveness Study 0198 Sprague, Park to University LID 0199 Havana -Yale Diversion 0200 Ponderosa Surface Water Diversion FHWA - STP(U 08/15/15 FHWA - STP(U 08/31/16 FMSIB tbd COSY COSY TIB - UAP 12/31/16 tbd 04/15/16 Dept of Ecology 06/30/17 Dept of Ecology 03/01/18 Dept of Ecology 10/31/16 Dept of Ecology 10/31/16 *Information in bold indicates updates 3 15 90 0 5 0 90 50 30 35 35 $ 917,700 $ 276,301 $ 720,000 $ 51,619 $ 10,000 $ 446,338 300,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 TRAFFIC CIP Projects Staff continues to coordinate with traffic related design and study items as part of CIP projects. The installation of countdown pedestrian timers at traffic signals is on-going (weather permitting). The sign upgrades and bicycle route installations are underway (weather permitting). Specific Studies Staff is coordinating with WSDOT on the Henry Road IJR and the North Spokane Corridor (NSC) IJR. Staff is coordinating with WSDOT on the Pines/Grace intersection analysis and the Pines/Mirabeau Parkway design report, and is collecting data for the signal warrant analysis at Pines/Appleway Trail. Development Projects Reviewing traffic impact studies and letters for several projects and assisting Development Engineering with the Comprehensive Plan Update and the Mirabeau Sub -Area Study. PLANNING AND GRANTS Pedestrian and Bicycle Program and Safe Routes to School Applications City staff submitted five applications this month to WSDOT for their call for sidewalk and bike projects. WSDOT "Call for Projects" Pedestrian and Bicycle Program (May 6, 2016) Indiana Ave Sidewalk Project, Pines (SR -27) to STA Park & Ride Safe Routes to School (May 13, 2016) Wellesley Sidewalk Project (north side only), McDonald to Evergreen 16th Ave Street Lighting Project, Dishman Mica to University Mission Ave Street Lighting Project, McDonald to Sullivan Citywide School Zone Crossing Beacons (10 Locations) Safe Routes to School program solicits projects that address school traffic safety, access and mobility within two miles of a school and/or local transportation safety program servicing children in grades K-12. The purpose is to increase the number of children walking and biking to school safely. Pedestrian and Bicycle Program. This program solicits projects that reduce pedestrian and bicycle collisions and increase the number of people who choose to walk and bike for transportation. Upcoming Grant Opportunities Staff has been notified that two grant opportunities are fast approaching. The Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) will conduct a TIB Workshop on June 6, 2016 for their Urban Programs grant. These grants will be for FY 2018 with an application deadline of August 19, 2016. A new safety grant program entitled the "2016 Innovative Safety Program" is being offered by WSDOT who will administer Federal Safety Funds. Staff is reviewing the grant criteria for this new program and is developing projects that would provide the highest safety benefits. Grant applications are due on July 31st, 2016 and results will be available in October, 2016. `Information in bold indicates updates 4 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 28, 2016 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ® information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: FY 2018 Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) Call for Projects GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adoption of 2016-2021 Six -Year TIP, June 23, 2015; Approval to accept federal STP grant funds from SRTC for the Sullivan/Euclid PCC Intersection project and recommending pursuit of additional grant funds from TIB, February 16, 2016. BACKGROUND: The Washington State Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) issued a Call for Projects on June 1, 2016 for allocation of funding for the Urban Arterial Program (UAP) and Urban Sidewalk Program (SP) for FY 2018. Approximately $75 M is available statewide for funding the Urban Arterial Program (UAP). The anticipated funding level for the Urban Arterial Program in the Northeast Region is about $8.2 M. The East Region Urban Sidewalk Program is expected to be about $1.05 M this year. Project applications are due Friday, August 19, 2016. Staff evaluated the TIB grant criteria and identified several projects that are anticipated to score well and have a high potential to receive funding. Staff reviewed the adopted 2017-2022 Six - Year TIP, the Pavement Management Program, accident hot -spots, and other elements of the City's transportation network. Staff will also coordinate project ideas with the Community and Economic Development Department staff and TIB staff. Based on a preliminary evaluation, the following draft list of projects was developed for consideration. Project Name Total Estimated Cost Grant Request Estimated City Match FY 2018 Urban Arterial Program (UAP) ($'s in 1,000's) Sullivan / Euclid Concrete Intersection (CN) $2,325 $660 $165 Euclid Ave. Reconstruction, Flora to Barker* $1,800 $1,440 $360 Mission Pavement Preservation, Pines to Evergreen $1,600 $1,280 $320 FY 2018 Urban Sidewalk Program (USP) ($'s in 1.000's) 32nd Ave Sidewalk Project, SR -27 to Evergreen $540 $432 $108 * Includes a widened shoulder or asphalt path Estimated project costs are planning -level preliminary estimates and are anticipated to change as more information becomes available and the grant applications are finalized. OPTIONS: Information only RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Information only BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The City's match on TIB funded projects is typically 20% of the total grant request. As the proposed TIB applications are developed, staff will coordinate with the Finance Department to ensure there are sufficient City funds to provide the needed match for the proposed TIB projects. Right-of-way is not an eligible cost for sidewalk projects. STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Worley, PE — Capital Improvement Program Manager Eric P. Guth, PE — Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: Project Summary Sheets SR)'li a ...0.sVal ley Sullivan/Euclid Concrete Intersection Sullivan/Euclid Concrete intersection (RWICN) Project Project Description: The Sullivan Road and Euclid Avenue intersection is experiencing severe ruttng, pavement raveling, and longitudinal cracking. This intersection serves the Spokane Valley Industrial Park and accommodates heavy truck traffic. The pavement is nearing the end of its useful life and needs to be replaced with portland cement concrete (PCC) pavement. The intersection sidewalk ramps will be upgraded to current ADA standards. The design and right-of-way phases are complete. These phases were funded with a federal transportation grant. The construction phase is scheduled to be completed during the 2017 construction season. Benefits of Project: Reconstruct this intersection using concrete pavement to support heavy industrial truck traffic so as to provide many years of ser- vice. A service life of 20 plus years can be expected with minimal maintenance. This project also removes obstructions to pedes- trian and transit users by upgrading the sidewalk ramps for better accessibility. Planning -Level Cost Estimate: Construction (CN) = $2,082,000 Total Project Cost—$2,082,000 This project is partially funded using City and Federal STP Urban funds. Euclid Reconstruction Project - Flora to Barker wal il nip 1- s 1 T i it 11 ODI ..43.NDEMIMi 011.111 11111111 •1 rive 3 St Eil L. 1 1 ria; , Iii 1 t 4'1 Hu� u Euclid Reconstruction Project Flora - Barker Project Description: Spokane County is planning to install a new 18" sewer line from Flora Pit Road along Euclid Avenue to Barker Road. The new sewer line will run under the existing road in City right-of-way. The average pipe depth in Euclid will be about 10 feet deep and will be a significant impact to the road when installed. Based on the City's Pavement Management Program and field review the road needs to be replaced and there are benefits to doing this when the sewer line is installed. This project will reconstruct a 1 mile section of Euclid Avenue from Flora to Barker Road. The roadway will be 28' wide, with one 12' lane in each direction and two foot shoulders along both sides. The project is antici- pated to provide new gravel shoulders and a 10 foot wide shared -use path on one side of the street. Benefits of Project: A new sewer line provides sewer service to large tracts of developable industrial zoned land and a new road provides good access to these tracts for many years to come. New bicycle and pedestrian facilities provide good east -west transportation choices for people living and working north of the Spokane River near the Cities northeast city limits. Planning -Level Cost Estimate Preliminary Engineering = $146,000 Right Of Way (RW) = $264,000 Construction (CN) = $1,390,000 Total Project Cost - $1,800,000 Mission Ave Preservation - Pines (SR -27) to Evergreen Mission Ave Pavernent Preservation Pines (SR -27) to Evergreen Mission Ave Project Description: This project will place a thick overlay (2.5 - 4 inches) on Mission Avenue from Pines (SR -27) to Evergreen Road. In addition, sidewalk ramps at intersecting streets will be replaced to comply with current ADA re- quirements. This project will also upgrade the current stormwater system. Benefits of Project: This project was identified in the City's 2015 Pavement Management Program as needing a thick overlay. Placing a new overlay on Mission Avenue extends the life of this roadway for many years. Mission Avenue provides accesses to I-90 through the Pines (SR -27) interchange on the west end. It also provides access to professional services and Valley Hospital along with low and high density housing. Additionally, Mission Ave provides access to the Spokane Valley at the Mission Connector at Evergreen Road. New sidewalk ramps will remove obstructions for pedestrians. Project -Level Cost Estimate Preliminary Engineering = $175,000 Right Of Way (RW) = $15,000 Construction (CN) = $1,410,000 Total Project Cost— $1,600,000 32nd Ave Sidewalk - SR -27 to Evergreen Spokane Valle 32nd Ave Sidewalk Project Pines (SR -27) to Evergreen Project Description: This project proposes to construct new curb and sidewalk along the north side of 32nd Ave from Pines Road (SR -27) to Evergreen Road. New drainage facilities will be installed to catch and treat stormwater. New ADA compliant sidewalk ramps will be placed on all street corners. Benefits of Project: A continuous sidewalk along 32nd Avenue removes obstructions for pedestrians and transit users. 32nd Av- enue ramps up to the Pines Road intersection on each side of the state highway. Sidewalk at the northeast corner of the intersection provides better visibility by removing the guardrail sight distance obstruction and placing them in the driver's view. New double depth drywells, SPC catchbasins and swales will be added to the project to correct drainage deficiencies. Planning -Level Cost Estimate Preliminary Design (PE) = $40,000 Right Of Way (RW) _ $ 0.00 Construction (CN) _ $500,000 Total Project Cost $540,000 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 28, 2016 Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® information ❑ admin. report Department Director Approval: ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: WSDOT 2016 Call for Projects - Innovative Safety Program GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: N/A BACKGROUND: The WSDOT (Washington State Department of Transportation) has issued a call for projects for the 2016 Innovative Safety Program. The purpose of the program is to reduce fatal and serious injury collisions on public roads using innovative safety improvements. The WSDOT call for projects is specific to four project improvement categories. This grant program focuses on high friction surface treatments at sharp curves, intersection conflict warning systems, projects to increase traffic signal operations or visibility, and compact roundabouts. WSDOT considers these four improvements/countermeasures to be low cost, able to be delivered quickly, and have a high potential to reduce fatal and serious injury collisions. In 2014 the City was awarded Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant funds to install retroreflective borders on traffic signal backplates at 10 signalized intersections that had the highest crash rates. Staff has reviewed the grant criteria for this call and has determined that the City can continue its effort to install reflective traffic signal back plates at several more intersections. Staff would recommend pursuing these funds to improve the safety at the signalized intersections. According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the use of backplates with retroreflective borders may result in a 15% reduction in all crashes at urban, signalized intersections. City staff has not had an opportunity to review the crash rates at the City's remaining 80 plus signalized intersections to determine the best candidates for this grant opportunity. City staff will evaluate the crash data and present a list of intersections to pursue at the City Council's July 5t", 2016, study session. Preliminary engineering/design, right-of-way, and construction phases of projects are eligible for funding. Project phases that start by August 31, 2017 are each eligible for 100% federal funding (no local match required). Staff would intend to begin all phases of this project prior to the August 31, 2017 deadline to receive the 100% federal funds. Applications are due on July 31, 2016. OPTIONS: Information Only RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Information Only BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: No financial match is required for this project if the project is under construction before August 31, 2017. STAFF CONTACT: Sean Messner, P.E., Senior Traffic Engineer Eric Guth, P.E., Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: Slide from 2014 Council Presentation showing Reflective Backplate Recommended Systematic Project •Yellow Reflective Backplates •Adds additional awareness to traffic signal indications •Recommended at signals per MUTCD 1 Slide from 2014 City Safety Program Call for Projects Presentation June 24, 2014