The URL can be used to link to this page

2016, 09-06 Study Session AGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION FORMAT Tuesday, September 6,2016 6:00 p.m. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11707 East Sprague Avenue,First Floor (Please Silence Your Cell Phones During the Meeting) DISCUSSION LEADER SUBJECT/ACTIVITY GOAL CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PROCLAMATION: Legislative Delegation Recognition ACTION ITEMS: 1.Mark Calhoun Legislative Agenda [public comment] Motion Consideration 2.John Hohman National Endowment of the Arts Our Town Grant, Motion Consideration Arts Masterplan [public comment] NON-ACTION ITEMS: 3.John Hohman,Mike Introduction of Draft Comprehensive Plan Discussion/Information Basinger 4. Cary Driskell Iron Horse State Park/John Wayne Pioneer Trail Discussion/Information 5. Eric Guth City Hall Update Discussion/Information 6.Mayor Higgins Advance Agenda Discussion/Information 7. Information Only(will not be reported or discussed):2017-2022 Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan 8.Mayor Higgins Council Check in Discussion/Information 9.Mark Calhoun Acting City Manager Comments Discussion/Information ADJOURN Study Session Agenda,September 6,2016 Page 1 of 1 Spokane Valley reclamation City of Spo4ne Valxey, Washington Legislative DeCegation Vcognition WHEREAS, during the 2015-2017 legislative biennium, the City of Spokane Valley was represented by 4th Legislative District legislators Senator Mike Padden, Representative Matt Shea, and Representative Bob McCaslin; and WHEREAS, the Spokane Valley City Council adopts a legislative agenda and meets frequently with the 4th District legislators to discuss issues important to the City and the Spokane Valley community; and WHEREAS, the above-listed legislators zealously advocated for the City's legislative priorities, including advancing a number of issues that helped the City balance its budget without increasing taxes; and WHEREAS, at the request of the City Council, the 4th District legislators sponsored legislation allowing cities to recover the costs of completing nuisance abatements from property owners, thereby reducing costs to a city's budget; and WHEREAS, the above-listed legislators secured funding over the next several years to enable completion of the paved portion of the Appleway Trail, a linear park and pathway through the heart of Spokane Valley; and WHEREAS,the 4th District legislators supported state-shared revenues, an important allocation of funds in the state budget that help fund City services; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the residents and businesses of Spokane Valley are well represented by an engaged,informed, and effective legislative delegation. NOW THEREFORE, I, Rod Higgins, Mayor of the City of Spokane Valley, on behalf of the Spokane Valley City Councilmembers, do hereby recognize and commend 4th District legislators Senator Mike Padden, Representative Matt Shea, and Representative Bob McCaslin for a job well done. Our City leaders, community members, and citizens express their deep appreciation for the legislators' continuing efforts on our behalf. Executed this 6th day of September,2016 on behalf of the City Council. L.R. Higgins,Mayor CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 Department Director Approval: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion consideration - 2017 Legislative Agenda. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: NA. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: At the June 14, 2016 Budget Workshop, Council discussed possible items to include on the 2017 Legislative Agenda; administrative report August 9, 2016 by Mark Calhoun, Acting City Manager, and Briahna Murray, Gordon, Thomas, and Honeywell; administrative report August 22, 2016. BACKGROUND: Following several meetings, the Council has expressed as desire to consider adoption of the attached proposed 2017 Legislative Agenda, comprised of five items. As we have done previously, a meeting will be set up with our legislative delegation, anticipated to be in October. OPTIONS: (1) approve the proposed 2017 Legislative Agenda as drafted; or (2) take other action as appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move we approve the proposed 2017 Legislative Agenda as drafted. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: NA. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun, Acting City Manager; Cary Driskell, City Attorney. ATTACHMENTS: Draft 2017 Legislative Agenda. DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY 2017 LEGISLATIVE AGENDA Support Legislation Clarifying Valley Water Providers'Water Rights The City of Spokane Valley residents and businesses receive water through multiple regional water providers. To ensure adequate water supply for the growing Valley community, current law needs to be changed to clarify these water providers' water rights are for municipal water supply purposes and are not subject to relinquishment. The water providers are using water rights currently designated for agricultural irrigation and dairy purposes,rather than for municipal water supply.Ecology has indicated that agricultural irrigation and dairy water rights held or acquired by a municipal water supplier cannot be considered municipal water supply water rights without filing for a change of use permit. A change of use permit process is slow,costly,and may diminish the overall water right. The City supports legislation that clarifies that the water rights held by water providers serving the Spokane Valley region can be changed to municipal water supply purposes without going through the change of use permitting process. Transportation Funding Request—Barker Road/BNSF Grade Separation Project The City of Spokane Valley respectfully requests that the state invest in Phase 1 of Bridging the Valley by allocating funds to the Barker Road/BNSF Grade Separation project. The Barker Road/BNSF Grade Separation Project replaces an at-grade crossing with an overpass of BNSF's railroad tracks and Trent Avenue (SR 290). The project will eliminate two at-grade crossings, eliminating train/vehicle crash risks. The project will improve train travel through the Spokane region, which is a bottleneck of the Great Northern Corridor. The total project cost is $36 million. The City has already secured $9.8 million. The City is seeking $26.2 million in future funding for the Barker Road/BNSF Grade Separation. Funding Appleway Trail Park Amenities The City of Spokane Valley requests $1,185,655 in the 2017-2019 Capital Budget for park amenities for the first mile of the Appleway Trail. These amenities include a restroom, picnic shelter, play equipment, splash pad, interpretative signage,tables, and benches along with an increased square footage of irrigated turf and trees.The City previously funded,designed and constructed the paved portion of the first mile with over $1 million without these amenities. The state has allocated funding for the remaining 3.25 miles (including amenities), scheduled over the next two years. This funding will bring amenities to the entire 4.25 mil trail,realizing the full conceptual plan and orienting future economic development. Protect the Local State-Shared Revenues The City of Spokane Valley requests that the Legislature preserve and restore local state-shared revenues. These funds include the Liquor Excise Tax Account ($303,724 in 2015), Liquor Board Profits ($806,570 in 2015), Streamlined Sales Tax Mitigation ($572,577 in 2015), Municipal Criminal Justice Assistance Account ($273,160 in 2015), City-County Assistance Account, and Marijuana Revenues ($37,912 in 2015). Specifically, the City supports legislation that removes the 2011 cap on Liquor Profit revenues to restore the 50/50 revenue sharing relationship between the state and local governments. Protect Businesses by Reforming State Regulatory Burden The City of Spokane Valley strongly supports small and large businesses in our City and across the state, because they are the lifeblood of our economy. Unfortunately,these businesses are forced to compete in a state regulatory environment that is increasingly burdensome, making it difficult to compete with businesses in neighboring states. Of most urgent concern is the regressive state business&occupation tax, with the current Labor&Industries program close behind,and both need significant reform before they do irreparable damage to commerce in Washington. Spokane Valley supports rebalancing the state-wide regulatory framework to encourage and support business development and retention. The City supports AWC legislative agenda items that serve the best interests of Spokane Valley. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 Department Director Approval: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: National Endowment for the Arts, Our Town Grant Opportunity GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Admin report August 30, 2016 BACKGROUND: The affects of public art have been shown to help spur economic development, foster a sense of community, increase tourism, and provide a path toward individual enrichment. Done correctly, public art is a vehicle for a community to express its identity. Annually, the National Endowment for the Arts through its Our Town grant program awards a limited number of grants to governmental agencies which are working to integrate public art into communities across the country. Grants range from $25,000 to $200,000 and can be used to fund a variety of projects related to public art planning and implementation. Government agencies are required to partner with a local non-profit art agency for work on the funded project and must contribute a 1 to 1 non-federal match for any funds received through the grant. City staff, with the assistance of the Spokane Valley Arts Council, are interested in applying for the Our Town grant to fund the creation of the City's first Public Arts Master Plan. Arts and culture have been shown to boost economic development, tourism and community identity. An arts master plan would establish a vision for public art throughout the City, determine how the City could use public art to promote the unique identity of our community and establish guidelines for public art projects. OPTIONS: Move to approve staff applying for the grant as noted, or take other action deemed appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve staff applying for Our Town grant to assist in funding an arts master plan. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Staff intends to apply for a$50,000 grant that if awarded, would require a 100% match from the City of$50,000 for a total project cost of as much as $100,000. STAFF CONTACT: Christina Janssen, Planner ATTACHMENTS: n/a CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 Department Director Approval: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Draft Comprehensive Plan GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Growth Management Act (GMA) RCW 36.70A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: Per RCW 36.70A.130(1), every county and city in the state is required to conduct an update of its comprehensive plan and development regulations every eight years. The City of Spokane Valley's update is due no later than June 30, 2017. Staff and the consultants are continuing to develop the Draft Comprehensive Plan. On May 3, 2016, staff conducted a joint workshop with City Council and the Planning Commission to provide direction to City staff and the consultant team on the land use alternatives as well as goal and policy focus areas. On June 7, 2016, staff provided the results from the joint workshop with the City Council and the Planning Commission. Staff received feedback from City Council on the workshop results providing further direction on the development of the land use alternatives and the goals and policies. On June 28, 2016, staff provided a presentation on residential development in our region to offer context for the proposed residential development standards. On July 26, 2016, staff provided an overview of the draft land use map and the correlation to the existing conditions report, with an emphasis on the focused analysis of Medium Density Residential, Mixed Use, Office, and Neighborhood Commercial. On August 9, 2016, staff provided an overview of draft goals and policies. Tonight, staff will provide an overview of the Comprehensive Plan draft and proposed adoption schedule. OPTIONS: N/A RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: N/A BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None STAFF CONTACT: Mike Basinger, Economic Development Coordinator ATTACHMENTS: Proposed adoption schedule PowerPoint Draft Comprehensive Plan (under separate cover) Meeting Planning Commission City Council Presentation of the Draft Future Land Use Map July 26, 2016 Presentation of the Draft Future Land Use Map July 28, 2016 Presentation and discussion of the Draft Comprehensive Plan August 9, 2016 Goals and Policies Presentation and discussion of the Draft Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies August 11, 2016 Presentation and discussion of preliminary amendments to the Development Regulations August 25, 2016 Presentation and discussion of preliminary amendments to the August 30, 2016 Development Regulations Initial introduction of the Draft Comprehensive Plan September 6, 2016 Public Open House- Draft Comp Plan and Regulations September 8, 2016 Kick-off- Beginning of 60-day notice public review of Draft EIS September 16, 2016 Comp Plan and Development Regulations (RCW 36.70A.106)* Study Session of the Draft Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations September 22, 2016 Public Hearing on Draft Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations September 29, 2016 Public Hearing on Draft Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations (Extended) October 6, 2016 Deliberation and recommendation to City Council on the Draft Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations; adopt October 13, 2016 Findings Administrative Report on the Planning Commission's Findings October 25, 2016 on the Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations Public Hearing; 1st Reading of the Draft Comprehensive Plan November 8, 2016 and Development Regulations End of the 60-day public review period November 15, 2016 2nd Reading of the Draft Comprehensive Plan, Development Regulations, and Final EIS November 22, 2016 (Proposed Adoption date) * It's expected that the notice for RCW 36.70A.106 (60-day Notice) will include a SEPA notice of availability and identify public hearing dates for the Planning Commission and City Council as hearings on the Draft EIS, Comprehensive Plan, and Development Regulations. Comprehensive Plan Legislative Update Draft Comprehensive Plan Overview Mike Basinger, Economic Development Coordinator Spokane u� Legislative Update Discussion Topic City Council Meeting Joint Workshop May 3, 2016 Results of Joint Workshop June 7, 2016 Residential Development Standards Comparison June 28, 2016 Overview of Draft Land Use Map July 26, 2016 Policy Overview and Discussion August 9, 2016 Overview Draft Comprehensive Plan September 6, 2016 Spokane 2 Valley Community Vision ■ Increased focus and access to parks and trails ■ Consider a specific focus area around new City Hall ■ Provide for a greater variety of housing types ■ Preserve the character of the neighborhoods ■ Locate housing near amenities like retail, health care, parks, and transit ■ Increase business opportunities and reduce barriers Spokane 3 Walley Council Goals ■ Streamline land uses and maximize flexibility ■ Preserve established neighborhoods ■ Provide for a variety of housing types like tiny homes cottage houses ■ Change the mixed-use designations along Trent ■ Consolidate Office and Garden Office or change to Corridor Mixed Use ■ Expand and designate new areas of Neighborhood Commercial Spokane 4 Walley .......... ........ ...iiim Draft Comprehensive Plan Approach • Economic Development focus Spokane j V ley • Innovative and data driven 0 0 • Easy to navigate with an attractive design a ; • Concise and understandable __ 1� rM • Includes existing studies • Retail Recruitment Spokane Valley • Tourism Comprehensive Plan 2017-2037 • Existing conditions reports Date Adopted • Includes strategic actions ,,. ,�„.. 0.6.„�„�„ , .0.60.61,...../.0.,..,�, ,.M.C. „H, Spokane 5 Valley Approach Continued Ci Land Use GOALS LU-GI. Maintain and enhance the character and quality of life in Spokane • Valleys neighborhoods. Specific section for goals and policies LU-G2 Provide fora balanced mix of land uses essential to Spokane Valley residents.employees and vis(tors. LU-G3 Transform commercial,industrial and mixed-use areas into acces le • Includes strategies in the goals and Ensure thatlandusbratns.radecoons,r activity. LU-G4 Enwrethatland use plans,regulations,review processes and infrastructure improvements support economic growth and vitality. POLICIES policies sectionstrategies LU-Pl €Tornateneighharhood-sca�commercial uses in residential areas. / This isa placeholderthat will LU-P2 Implement strategies that are intended to support unique.high / heusestrategiesin afuture draft. quality and locally owned retail in appropriate locations. LU-P3 Preserve the natural Features that make Spokane Valley attractive to residents and business owners. LU-P4 Encourage the provision of common open spaces in neighborhoods. LU-PS Ensure compatibility between adjacent residential and commercial or industrial uses by regulating height,scale,setbacks and buffers f//.d6Y/0:44IDY/•GIDY//.ID///.IDY//.IDY//.bY//.f/Mer LU-P6 Support neighborhood efforts to wstainablycultivate produce. LU-P7 Protect residential neighborhoods from incompatible land uses and adverse impacts associated with transportation corridors. LU-P8 Ensure that neighborhoods are served by and convenient motorized and non-motorized transportation routes. LU-P9 Provide supportive regulations for new and innovativedevelopment types on commercial,industrial and mixed-use land- LU-P1D Enure that freight-intensive operations have convenient access to designated truck routes and Intermod al terminals. Spokane 6 Valley ''........m... 7............IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Approach Continued Implementation Legend •Economic Development Matrix •Land Use ■ . . •::: ionIncludesa n implementation Thestegieslthe precompiled far For estratementovided asoores • lities& the relationship between strategy and element.designates lead staff for Public Services implementation activities.outlines a time table for completion,and provides a •Housint rough sense of relative priority matrix identifying• This section is forthcoming. •Parks&Open Spaces •Natural Resources •Public&Private Utilities • Strategies PRIMARY ET • Primary Element _RATEGY LEEM T.) LEAD TIMING PRIORITY • 1 Strategy wrR to waned Ilene Economic •• • • ptarr.ng 2f HIGH Related Elements � � rnent • 2 Strategy ranee outgretl Mre • •Land Ve •• • • Planning an 2000( LOW 3 Strategy will Ee rutlirsd hers • • •• Plannng 20n MED • Lead staff Transportation 4 Strategy MI to unlined here Captsl • •• Said Waste 20X( HIGH Facilities 5 Strategy w Le here " • • GE 20)0{ HIGH • Timing 'ng 6 Strategy Miteruthned here Parts&• • • Planing 20XX LOW Spare • Priority Strategy+ali to rutred here • •Narsl rre • • Nannng 2m% HIGH 8 SU-MegytnIIte unlined here • •• Planing 20XX MED llnlmes Spokane 7 Valley ion Approach Continued WHY oTdHE`ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT IS IMPORTANT Economic development is therising tide that lifts all boats.It creates living wage jobs,buildsvakred community amenities and generates additional municipal revenues that can be used to fund new programs and facilities.In order to attract ■ Elements are similarly organized • and retain companies,inc reale their productivity and grow the lural and regional • economy,effective policy from all other comprehensive plan elements is required. In that sense,theeconomic deve€opmentelementis integrative,and depends on effective land use regulations.quality parks and recreation amenities.efficient transportation lure,reliable and Infrastructure,affordable • Why the element is important housing opportunities and sustainable resource managementPut simply. economic development is intertwined i nalf of the Citys services and roles and is reliant on a dynamic and thoughtful approach to land use planning. • Planning Context Though regulations channel market forces toward a coherent vision.proactive economic development efforts are responsible for attracting,recruiting and retaining office.industrial.and commercial and residential uses within acity • Current Conditions This element is therefore focused an harnessi rtg market forces to encouragethe imp€ementationof Spokane Valleys vision.The Economic Development Element therefore provides a comprehensive overview of Spokane Val legs economy.sets Challenges and Opportunities policy dlred prow the economy.[h,and identifies strategies,programs and • prolectsto improve the economy. PLANNING CONTEXT • Best Practices a n d Required Measures Economic development Kone ofthefundamental goals under of the Washington State Growth Management Act.Asa whale.the economic development element attemptsto merge the efforts of the public and private sectors—the public sector has the ability to mold and influence development,but it is often the private sector that implements community visions through private investment.Moreover,the GMAstipulates that the economic development element promote economic oppa tunityfor all citizens.particularly individuals who are unemployed and/ or disadvantaged.Lastlythe statewide economic development planning policies prescribe a balance between economic growth and theefhcient use of land and natural resources.which means that economic development efforts most be based in sustainable planning paradigms. The Spokane County-Wide Planning Policies{CWPPJ build upon the statewide economic development goals by calling for additional cooperation between Spokane 8 Valley Goals and Policies ■ Goals and policies were developed for the following elements • Economic Development • Land Use • Housing • Transportation • Capital Facilities • Utilities • Parks, Recreation and Open Space • Natural Resources Spokane 9 Walley .........m... ........... miiiiin Land Use Map • Created one multifamily designation •�� Imo/+ - ' r,./.......:, / ' F lila I• 1 — 11V—ICI 11■� .1■ 0 q till- EValermayItt i / ,/ / �/�, � I- -:::::,---,1.--\\-11 - [ 1 _ 1 4-i-- -2. I.— i— — r7., w ,.../ M Ippl ar 4 iir Fr 21 r �e mm W.-I �'�,'�'>'1,. Il 1 _ ,hie i • • f/ _ 4p ,j Il1=1 -` 1111//11.1)1 T 1�' 'ri./�'r�. L �_ lzi // ///,-z' ,. r rip ■ , I IL .. .,,,„,1, >> III l , ■■■■ ■ :i•• 1 , 1 ::,.._/;:l Nallgil � - :■ -VIII __ M1111111.11k ■■�■ Spokane 10 Valley ---'"""'" Land Use Map • Designated new areas for parks and open space • Land by Mirabeauit ' • Appleway Trail ROW x I 1°04 :L tI11ii____ _ r ,- ._,._. . ,,,,-- f _,..„___i ■It SIL T■IL 1 ='ArEra , us e l- . ,....-../;57,,,,-,///-/-7 , „ ,x 11■1■ ■1■I ■ ■��■�y►.yyl/�src ■■■.i. J-■1111:�i■■� ■. .s Hi �! li 1■�■■■■111:�� ri■■�11■-. `�i Rsirii 'i6 :l` ■ uiil� 111111 ■��_ m1.1,67.1; 11■1 / 11 ■ 1 II■1■pi:iii/r1 1.! op 1 1L-111.1 mi'•�.■ ■■■■■1■.Fi 11■I 1_=P ir-■ IF p:61. _. I I�mom: C01! i nvi // . 1 i1 _� J 1 11-■-gym... 0 rm • ■ I./ / 1 J. 1111 ■1 c.7y-,rkora[ IEEE= I1�m ==CJS■ .{."'1 ir' ' ■ 1•■ i.i►11yy�J74R11!d�r11 !1�r� 1 1 It 1 i ► !W;110;/ I ■I;II,�I� 1■^�RAS ,�7i9yifil- '• ' I 1 � �Arollsorarommi I7/7;7'. >,r', � r _ / -// fYf J iI -.' Um ro ER5 101111211511"1117.11100, 111-=■:7�III� 1 ISI -=•II•-= 11 I===_ um 7 ... .on. ' ; . Il�un ■■ ■■■ 11� i ILL Rf7 -•■-� 1 ■ ■ .■ I-�-• - IIIIII■11111n ■■■■■■a ■.1 _}_ --- --It . Ri.f3i1i15 if4 i+4 0i®r PE CZ rp��■'� f- •■ L� 'III --11111111111111.-1r1210... ,� .. gri,-Amir 1SjJE Ri on .s�al-... _ Ir�I I I �.... .■■ .. . .-■1■IIII■■1■■■■■■i ■ _ II inunnnii.■1■■ 1111..11111E I !=1a 1 j_':�1�� 1■IIIIIIIIIIIu--�iislfl� '_ Spokane 11 Valley ..........m... ........ iiiiiiiiin Land Use Map — gip od1 . 11161■4 all IrIJ11 �unll 1 iln■■NE a- _ Far -or, .:Iraerre ■11-- 1■mint.:o1� ■■ : ram: .. C �r3 ■ Changed Office corridors to Corridor Mixed Use = "°1ii IFF__ _1- _ Off~ , ■ .■. • Multifamily, office, retail, and light manufacturingNom I iii -: , 1- d Imill =4 IllIIIJI 1■'■■■■m■,-1 mmi - III1 Ike■ Ir■■■■■ n al E __"............__ _,..,'-'4:'' „-.'-3,','.1:'.,:1._"—...t_.X_"'_-.' __' ''q_I 1=.'=4;,,-;,.e.....s.. I�1.!I1N1l .ILS IF i 1- � ,• r� r '% �€ 11P— IIIµ=E111 �ylyf yllmg l. in gi rl Ff ArEJlidirol,';Pi' liAlo ___ -�' _ -- mill !•1 IRV /Ii p �� /j�oPi 11■1111 %J/ ■ # III■ niPmc/.r - .E oI ,=E111 i! ,..h61.! x''111111 -� ■■ f Q ■■■■ 1 YAPS/ " '.1 lis r m ■ yob 11 11■1■1 I■ ,,--1._._1�7 / 1 _ _ ..��ri.PA ti-�� =■■ .I� Sion 11111 �{,.__ �. ��.; ss _ r :i1 1111 7 ot0i:�+mg �t■—� ►t 11 11111 ��■. ►�11�� - .11 C ■ rr Elgin 0 r 5 NA .' %f MM._; . ■/1■1 1 III 1■IH/ i --_ 1. 11 IR' '�' EV Ap, ■■1111■ 11.7:111 -- 9.■ .�r_ 5 ....,,,m,,,,-1r...tir-.a�: ��! ._ ...■11■1■■I■ i■■■t�` 1 f h --iV■=-- = -.F ■ 1-11-illll:ii ■'=.. 1go1 I iE.: ■o.L1 rsr■■■■■111111 1111111■11 1■■11111111 r . Sj, ■ - .E6115 w2I,/i111 I I s�� ■1■■F�'; 11111111■111 ■�■-��=� .-��■�■ � � rte �s f i�� m I 11111111x1 '■■■■1.1..11■��I ' �/1■■1■■11■11■ �� =per�■�. ♦ — �.� i wa /rll■Rilll�i■a 1■1111 11 111 mw. w 5 a■:- �� 1.- _-_==.. ■�.,., ii ■�a ^~v -KM Ji •■■■■1.1.11.1.1 1■■■ ■1■■■■■ I • i1ILiosifr =.- E .11Q:1fi7M ti? ' ,, 1 1 5.1= oor��yos- 1 I 1 in0R ISw/ - - I I I !_ y s ,04 '1,:-.---.:-------b-'- = Spokane 12 Valley ..........m... .......... .iiiiiiin Land Use Map • Designated new areas for neighborhood commercial development at major intersections in close proximity to existing neighborhoods , rrr T ilPll .�e �� I+ 1 1, ani $a * it ""r 6 " ;g 1 s 1 i e i A m gi c FA. l Spokane 13 Valley Land Use Map • Created Industrial Mixed-Use designation along Trent Avenue • Allows for light industrial (contractors and tow yards) • Continues to allow for commercial uses - - I I_Hi •E 8 aad ve V.Z.Z> : - 9 • LI Ali ■ .., .,. .0 1:5 , • •rr1 .. R ■ • E Her4y Ave 4.! frd. �. a ■ ells Ave jr� //moi 0. - {/7/ - . VA" f�• i_ ` .r :///,,.,.,,,5,.`7:(0,:::;) E Rich Ave v f . all E �' ZorweI I Ave '/ ...-....--..-7i rr d j ;' F /•::•.:•0„v.:-. R_ 27.6 f .,-,-„,-,'/-2,-/-7,1 r /r1r 1,_-'‘./.., /f , /' . ',Al . LacrassBLnC- £�fr917 ///1,/ / - fes.,' t E Industri-I ParkA St } Spokane 14 Valley Land Use Map • Consolidated the industrial designations :III-E! I Iillll�l" ',,M71 .-111,mir■■��-" C = 1.11111:Pq■■■i■ e■■t ',.�I �� ■� X` ire.S.'�� OE-1111R— III !ii L. III u. E■IfWin'I:■�!■iw�jli _ Pr Affer/ 4 _ 35{III.f1111�1 ■ � v i■ ■�1 ■IIII�■�Ilf�ti =:..,,,:134.211.11.441...0 F _. r - ryl] a n■E �.. ■ �_ = at. t-. - _ - �� 0-7.00727.,,,,, I ' ..smilialil I...u.. 7 ijAmil fo, _, _ . . ,...,c, _•,-.._-__-__,. --- ,,,_ _,,,,rEmmi,...k......., mw, , . -:69. re rer.41.4. ' { .. WI 0011111- 1111°"' .firinlinj r .4, ,..m..; Ar„.... , _. _ E ..dam.: graP !I f.-4-1,1 I I 4.---ir 11 : alli - 2 miii , --,-,- -/O Are1 . .: 11111111741pAk1-7,, N. r N „„._ _______ i-4 ill a -.ar. g. °--- . - _.„- -,4.-e2 : iliarkaW.- ' . 2iw.xtg Iii will' 7,•• ..,,,,— ; 1,7---i, ,-, ',-: , ,.; i, n . :. ,,,,,„,„,1,10,04... ,...1. ._ ..e, ' s� 'p! '- 111 •1i•1• 71 ■ q . ,, a�i '�miring ■: . " ,' ''''44: ' Y31 pi -<€.- 1 {al" ' IIILint;;;Ziditisim;j'i""' -„di irImmlibhat...... , r 555ff°' ' - ---'-' r .7 y. y,iiiiN rr 1Ilh 4i5ix1 ;. :1"::',__ Afrow. iiir Wil.2,-.-+IF In 7.11.1 .`'..;'i tIl.... , INNW- re�, �.;7=AWL._� r �� lir■1� +11�l� :0,!....;....%.1,,..' '�r- !r I�S f � me g ,,roll j ......- ,- -1.1 . 1111 ;!�■ .. ■ ii III- Fjj! :!is " s 'v .IRI Si okane 15 Valley .........m... ....... ..iiiiiin Land Use Map • Integrated Community Commercial into Corridor Mixed Use and Regional Commercial —14 11/ 22 11 =_ 11111 III - J %G�i1■■�n i�' � 6r31�I- ---1-i-3. Ii J ' ,�.f • ///�/ r III III I I Jam ` f� rri I -- ■■ ■ w■1 r . a. I . - _ P r /. / // / i.. I y II l ,! `; �AJ ,ii, IF BJ►. ! i V' ir, _ , f , l m,k l R E � 1p --T L1 ' r/ ` ' —fi r ;• r ig 1 1 /i / !/- If /rL / I ZA I ifM■ :Lipp i ■ r ■■ C; � ,, 'f/✓'.! 1f:• ' 4 Ell . ///yr, /fr / / f / ��,ff/flp, 1 -JtlpplrrJ t 1fr /� / 4 ' `?/,/- Il � ;, f% ,/// -//-/I /�A/// /// /r /t 7 AL[• fJr , r i !, Add AL, 7///_• , /A.,,, ,,,,,,,, , ,,,,,/,/,,./ , T 4 If. /r ` I — a'l `.7ff/ //5 / I� / //,/` � f /, j '" t i // fH f , i./ {ff // if r'e/ (, . , /-•.///////2_ '`/ 7,—/.7////,/,rs !`JJ_�f / I s7 /Ir / i'`I Ffli . j J/-p J 1 ----I _ ` " J f 1 / // J J Ifl ./ ..--,iv, s Ai I�-],-, Spokane 16 Valley Land Use Map -- —� „ __,,.._ , _ 1 ,,,, m -----___ ___”- .., _. , . ._r----J - \ I ■ New housing opportunities : ago �` :-- r r� • North/south corridors � AL ---..„...s.�'` "'� NiaL is maw • Consolidated R3 & R4 In _ -- "" `•� • .� yi , �- ^ 7�r�iii emn ■c Ara Mil • Consolidated MF zones jii.~''r" -= �i S--- ''''''''''j'j-- • New mixed-use area Iii P AL Housing Designations Community Prosperity Mery or sr,oxa.vs.2076 Comprehensive Pla n Designations _wav,sodv Si ilei Roads _n au X14 M. Spokane 17 Valley ..........m... .......... .iiiiiiiin Land Use Map • 1.__ Spokane MEav Mining , . • Created language in develo ment re ulations -%' , � h , � t. A _ p g } .% 1r'� 4' ....n. to allow existing mining 1' — - . ,_. _— i1. a r R operations to mine } - - 1- ikt within their permitted 1 �' '` wk o rights FQ �, '1.:, I s s y� Y ' A�- L 0 �,�Jp^ r 4. Spokane 18 Valley .........m. ........ ..iiiiim Community Prosperity Proposed Map (9 Designations, 11 zones) Existing Map (12 Designations, 17 zones) I a J16-- _40.... N 11111-„ -1111. J., L AN --.---,.. . - .. FM MOM+ ,„,de -a-.a.rawAragorajlika A 1114i min• ".- 4-2 1 A 4 '''-'-'e- -: It atilf. • iiiii ,- 7tig. la*0 affingli ..... am ,,. ...., ma a gam ilRIMMI=EllillIalikarMft-iiirt SMERP4111tr Nitia_lktiw,... mi-&-` ,...,,,11111: ......11-1 —,---,..-z•M ..- Pr-T-!..a ,lilir, 'M ,:',,, .-...',.-zA•Mob...fkr I a 4allairi'M .111Ir - no" . illi PI, I i lLic\'''-Pjr— Ts' r ABM il . '..1 ' . L . a r fik , .RI Com rnimrly Prosperity Afternative \ ST ...e.e, .......= M Ant.t ere.cl v ,,,,.. .414 ,,,, ,.... — RI...an...A.2017 =,ona,ca,,mencm 4\ Sr gle Film y m......,,c.u w gm..n.....,.. =I m.,,,,Y m.,,.,,m, I=,n.'',.'." EN Parks.Open Si.. .... ../......"—\N--.—....... Skokane 19 .000Valley Schedule Meeting Planning Commission City Council Public Open House September 8, 2016 Study Session September 22, 2016 Public Hearing September 29, 2016 Public Hearing (Extended) October 6, 2016 Deliberation and recommendation to City Council October 13, 2016 Administrative Report October 25, 2016 1st Reading (Public Hearing) November 8, 2016 2nd Reading November 22, 2016 Spokane 20 jValley Questions Spokane 21 Walley DRAFT --es,„,...... S,��o" kane rVa ley e '' 1 4l(' fAt+ •J'k{ , \... .• it•ir. r '+1• `." SIL. tty\` 5 k ,0• P, r5 r r,,.1. ell w r ;j"•. + 1 �,s�'7+�{+"" '�','! }" "'i1" �y'..' .5 r. [.r�• f.:,� r y, +lr• c';' yy+y 4. 1! } �•�i _ i •;}Y .b 6 '.. ,�. A: .Y'1•'�' �k! ".. er 1 r, ., A,' i.'s' . ^ww! �r... `` Iii.',:' t 1 it,rt?7 Li, :� i r 9e r. 3 , •ti f t Ta.1 ,. e''"f 3 1 y 1 i .,, ,. 'M ` C.�r ,. 'kyr LTA, �' 7 y, j,. 1 'ti, 1 F f / S;� ft#d 5 ,. s 1 4101444 : * ' ,,F:• . I l � \f { , 0m r 1 (k' '1 3: } e Plan p 2017-2037 September 2016 / //// // //// /// //////////// ////// / /// // /////// ////// / //// / //////// / ///////////////////////////A Acknowledgements City Council Rod Higgins, Mayor Arne Woodard, Deputy Mayor Pam Haley Ed Pace Caleb Collier Sam Wood Mike Munch Planning Commission Kevin Anderson Heather Graham James Johnson Tim Kelley Mike Phillips Suzanne Stathos Michelle Rasmussen Community and Economic Development Department Mark Calhoun,Acting City Manager John Hohman, Community Development Director Mike Basinger,Senior Planner Lori Barlow,Senior Planner Chaz Bates, Economic Development Specialist Gloria Mantz, Development Engineer Sean Messner, Senior Traffic Engineer Consultant Team Van Ness Feldman Community Attributes Inc. Fehr and Peers AECOM Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction &Vision i-V Chapter 2: Policy Plan & Strategy 2-23 Chapter 3: Economic Development Element 3-39 Chapter 4: Land Use Element 4-57 Chapter 5: Transportation Element 5-71 Chapter 6: Housing Element 6-93 Chapter 7: Capital Facilities Element 7-109 Chapter 8: Private & Public Utilities Element 8-129 Chapter 9: Parks and Open Space Element 9-139 Chapter 10: Natural Environment Element 10-147 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK. i-iv / / / / / / CHAPTER 1 Introduction & Vision ,„„ „ „ \. TRO DJc>TT0 N Spokane Valley is a city of about 94,000 people in eastern Washington,only 10 miles from the Idaho border. It is bordered by Liberty Lake to the east, Millwood to the north and Spokane to the west,and the Spokane River and Interstate 90 bisect the City on an east-west axis; as the ninth-largest city in Washington State, it is an integral part of the greater Spokane region (Figure 1). Though Spokane Valley incorporated relatively recently—in 2003—it is already a major retail destination and a recognized employment center that offers opportunity to visitors and residents alike. Location of Spokane Valley in the Region I''''"' ,i ' 1 ' +' Municipal Boundaries - " + .1 j , 1 r'ii. Q Spo<,re Valley i ' i!. ", ,, ' ,. , r"Ip • t - f • / • SpnancVdlc1Urban Grr,SsthArca',LICA; / r j ,r,' .,'/ ' fr ri ` Parks.Rcre.tio1.SOjm5'/cc � .,f r " + fr c U '4. 4'„. . ' I sr }I C 3r1 '' n' F f I •1 r: : J,• .1 % Ir=. , ( is i . • h' -_ --,(--. 61 ' • • + r .,Y. I, r ,If,, $a / I - •'• ° 1 ! ;r ` e ,i� , i' + � Ra hdum r 5,c1,,,eRi,.=+a� ;,,i /,° . r, r ,, ''r H i - . , 4 1 Post Falls -lf z Slygine ' + f 1P0 I Coeur 'Alene y�,' . l 'Spokane I . i7\... a _ •,` .. i i' Felts.FierdMlllwood I f- i i + ....i...--. r— ii Lrherty Lake t / ,,s , it _ l_Spokane Valley 2 -- -_ -r - 1- 1 ,•, y i, 1 tt` • 7 l� Airway Heights i ° �� , t Fairchild e r 7 _ t J 1 -; ''J ye .`11 Air Force Base SpcOcane International Airport I• <l 1 F l Ftcrer,i 5re,+r} / 'sr r jjr ,, MI l ?', J t;r f MedIcayl Lake"''!'` -' - ? • • r y`�' l `�T� rr.l%r• rt,` r.+ ' oti;', 92) �r S• ` , r +o d \-/ i,s a rtf ' Cheney r ryi. . i ro � %/ 1 ( `t � J/ p Rockford { f/ ,ems ! �,- :tu;r�.>„� Sp,angle /fI `.J ? . 5 10 f 15. i. ee V.c•ex<:., d 1 ! I :• Miles , Figure 2. Map of Spokane Valley and the Greater-Spokane Region Source:Community Attributes inc.(2016);Note:for the purposes of this document, "Spokane Valley”nod"the City”refer to the incorporated City of Spokane Valley.In certain ports of this document,particularly those dealing with the history of the region, "the Spokane River valley"and"the valley"refer to a larger area related to the course of the Spokane River. i-vi As one of Washington's larger and faster growing cities, Spokane Valley is required to regularly update its comprehensive plan. This document includes the required update while referencing several other City plans and policies to guide growth and development for the next 20 years. This chapter, as an introduction to the updated Comprehensive Plan, contains some background about Spokane Valley's past and present, an overview of the comprehensive planning process and relevant legal frameworks, and a statement of the City's vision for the future. About Spokane Valley A brief history of the Spokane region and Spokane Valley is essential to COMMUNITY SNAPSHOT understanding the demographic and economic trends and community priorities that underpin this planning effort. j • Land Area: 38.5mi2 NATIVE POPULATIONS AND EARLY SETTLEMENT • Population: 94,160 The Spokane River valley has been inhabited for thousands of years. The • Total Employment: 50,944 earliest residents of the valley (a geographic expanse roughly stretching from the river's source at Lake Coeur D'Alene to the current location of the City • Key Industries (Employment) of Spokane)were members of the Spokane, Coeur D'Alene and Kalispel tribes > Retail Trade(9,650) of the Interior Salish peoples. These tribes harvested, hunted and fished > Health Care/Social Assistance throughout the area and valued the stock of trout and salmon in local rivers (8,205) and streams.They also traded extensively,which frequently brought them into > Manufacturing(6,848) contact with other tribes from the region, including the Nez Perce and Palouse, • Median Age: 38.4 Furthermore, the valley's topography allowed the Spokane River to run broad and flat, creating a natural corridor for foot traffic and bringing diverse groups • Educational Attainment together. > High School or Higher:91.9% > Bachelor's or Higher:20.9% In 1849, Antoine Plante, a French-Canadian trapper and voyageur, arrived and built a cabin at a popular crossing of the Spokane River. By 1851 he had • Median HH Income: $48,274 opened an outpost of the Hudson's Bay Company and a established a ferry service, marking the first permanent non-native settlement of the valley. U.S. Sources:Washington OFM(2016);U.S. Census ACS(2014);U.S.Census LEHD Army Captain John Mullan came to know Plante while building a military (2014) road through the region, and documented the quality of the ferry operation. j/// //////////////// ?'//// As additional settler's, including Steven Liberty, William Newman, William Spangle,Joseph Moran and Addison Dishman,arrived in the decades following i'vu Plante's settlement, new homes, businesses and infrastructure projects were REFERENCES KEY developed to accommodate the growth. Many of these early inhabitants have 0 Refers to other section given their names to prominent natural features and built landmarks in and 9-114 in plan around present-day Spokane Valley. Refers to other Spokane CV) Valley plans and official documents • Refers to other 0 non-Spokane Valley references for further reading .44161-40 V �fg .-. - 1�' rr�' r! rears) 1 j +r f if 10rw. I. 1' ' ‘,. i y L ,.y rim ', S ► .14010 An 1860 watercolor by James Madison Alden depicts'Plante's Crossing"on the Spokane River, near present-day Spokane Valley. With the opening of the first transcontinental railroad in 1883, the valley received an influx of new settlers, many of whom were miners looking to capitalize on the discovery of silver in northern Idaho. Immigration and settlement took on new tones in 1895,however,when a local water company was formed to irrigate the valley with water from nearby lakes. In 1900,when Albert Kelly dug a deep well, he found an underground river that would later become known as the Spokane Valley-Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer. In short order, the Modern Electric Water Company and the Vera Electric Power and Water Company formed to pump and distribute this newfound and abundant source of water, thereby enabling large-scale agriculture. Apple trees became the For more information on predominant crop and by 1922, there were 1.6 million apple trees growing 0 Spokane Valley's history, & in the Spokane River valley. These trees were so prominent that the primary see: HistoryLink.org road between Spokane and Coeur D'Alene became known as Apple Way—a Essay No. 10,119. precursor to today's Appleway BoulevaRoad ////////////////////////////////////////////// The early agricultural townships that spring up with the advent of irrigation and the maturation of agriculture were called Opportunity, Veradale, Trent, Dishman, Yardley and Greenacres, among others. These communities retain i-viii their unique histories and identities today, with only Millwood choosing to incorporate (in 1927) prior to the larger amalgamation of towns as the City of Spokane Valley in 2003. DECLINING AGRICULTURE, RISING INDUSTRY As apple crops faced increasing competition from Wenatchee and Yakima, the valley began an economic transition. Though the area's orchards were being replanted with other crops or converted to non-agricultural uses as early as 1926, a deep freeze in 1955 sealed the fate of the apple industry in Spokane Valley. Timber harvesting became more prominent as a local industry, and spinoff enterprises like matchstick and paper manufacturing emerged. The rapid growth of the Spokane region continued through the early 20th century, and the expansion of electricity allowed continued economic innovation. When, prior to World War II, the federal government decided to build an aluminum manufacturing facility (the Trentwood Aluminum Rolling Mill) in the valley, widespread industrialization ensued. Government warehousing facilities were constructed as part of an Naval Supply Depot in 1942, anchoring an industrial area that would eventually become the Spokane Business and Industrial Park. Robust growth in the decades following World War II led to concerns about the environmental impacts of new development, especially on water quality in local lakes and the underground aquifer.A waste management plan and sewer system were established by Spokane County in 1983, but concerns about water quality are ever-present and represent a key policy issue to this day. SPOKANE VALLEY TODAY Spokane Valley today reflects its history as a collection of disparate agricultural communities, and the long-lasting drive for annexation between 1963 and 2003 is further evidence of the diversity of opinion surrounding the valley's future. Nevertheless,steady growth continues to push Spokane Valley forward Between 2003 and 2014, Spokane Valley's population grew by almost 11%. Compared to county and statewide annual growth rates during the same time period, Spokane Valley grew at a slightly slower pace: 0.9%, compared to 1.1% in Spokane County and 1.2% statewide. By 2037, the City is expected to accommodate 14,650 new residents. Spokane Valley's economy is intrinsically tied to the larger regional economy, i-ix and despite a major recession that began in 2008,total employment in Spokane County increased by 8,200 jobs between 2005 and 2014(Figure 2). Before the impacts of the recession were realized, the ten-year high was 208,900 jobs in 2007. The Spokane Valley economy, like the County economy, has taken several years to recover lost ground and regain momentum. Nevertheless, the local economy has several strong anchors and is poised for further growth. Figure 1. Total Employment by Industry Sector, Spokane County, 2005 - 2014 250,000 - — 200,000 . • . . I' 4e Ag/Resources Construction 150,000 III FIR E r Manufacturing 1 I 11111111 !I WTO Retail ■Government 50,000 Seiv Services 0 N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 in Q. J Oo 'O Q N N W .. Source:Community Attributes fnc.(2016) The top three employment sectors in Spokane Valley are retail, health care and social assistance, and manufacturing. In 2014, these three industries together accounted for 48.4 % of employment in the City. Demographic and economic trends that are relevant to future policy in Spokane Valley are further explored in the individual plan elements. i-x The Comprehensive Planning "There is nothing Framework casual, or perfunctory, about a certified Spokane Valley is updating its Comprehensive Plan in accordance with the comprehensive plan as Growth Management Act (GMA), chapter 36.70A RCW. The Comprehensive the statutes require it Plan is the City's official statement regarding its vision for future growth and to set forth a number of development over the next 20 years. The comprehensive plan is a required document for the largest and fastest-growing cities and counties in Washington i specific elements... and State, and these documents must be periodically updated. This 2017 update it serves as a guide to of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan is the first legislative update since the later development 2009. and adoption of official zoning controls." There are several important sources of information that go into the comprehensive plan,including GMA-required elements,linkages to the Spokane Washington State Supreme Court Countywide Planning Policies(CWPPs)and other local plans and policies,input Smith v. Skagit County(1969) from citizens and other stakeholders, and identified best practices based on established knowledge and recent trends. This section discusses each of these /i ////// sources to establish a framework for the comprehensive plan. THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT For more information The GMA was passed into law in 1990 by the Washington State Legislature, j on GMA and the legal It is intended to prevent uncoordinated and unplanned growth, to maintain aspects of planning, sustainable economic development and to protect a cherished quality of life. CD see: "A Short Course The act requires select cities and counties in Washington to protect sensitive i on Local Planning: areas and resource lands, channel anticipated growth into urban growth areas Resource Guide"at (UGAs), prepare and regularly update comprehensive plans and implement www.commerce.wa.gov. them through capital improvements and development regulations. Spokane iiiiiiiii/iii//ilii/i/ilii/i County and Spokane Valley are required to plan under GMA mandates,so this section explores the provisions of GMA in greater detail. The GMA is an expression of the State's interest and investment in local planning decisions. Planning activities—including development regulations— at both the state and local levels are statutorily enabled by the Planning Commission Act, the Optional Municipal Code, and the Planning Enabling Act. The courts in Washington State have, moreover, established that planning activities are a valid exercise of a jurisdiction's constitutionally-protected police power(to enforce regulations that are substantially related to the public health, safety, morals or general welfare of a community). i-xi Required and Optional Elements For cities and counties fully planning under GMA, there are a number of required elements. Jurisdictions may include other optional elements at will, but with greater flexibility. GMA instructs each element to include specific components, including goals, policies, maps and analytics. For cities, the required elements are as follows: • Land Use • I lou • Capital Facilities • l i�iiir s • fransportation • Shorelines • Economic Development • Parks and Open Space In some cases,the inclusion of optional elements allows a city to more fully plan for the vision expressed by its citizens and its various economic development priorities. The Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan therefore includes the following optional element: • Natural Environment {includes Shorelines.above) In this plan, each element is given its own chapter.The chapters are mutually reinforcing, and—individually and in sum—meet the requirements of the GMA. The following section provides specific references to the location of those required components within this document. i-xii Ensuring GMA Compliance Each element included in this comprehensive plan meets all GMA requirements, as catalogued in the Department of Commerce's July 2014 Expanded Comprehensive Plan Checklist. The checklist, which also includes some recommended items and best practices, is reproduced below as a guide to the content in this document, I:LONUMIC DI:VEI.OPMI:N i FI.I:N11-:NT(Recommended) The following required components of the Economic Development Element have been addresses in this plan: I1 Summary of the Local Economy RI Assessment of Strengths and Weaknesses RI Policies, Programs and Projects to Foster Economic Growth LAND USE ELEMENT 121 Consistency with Countywide Planning Policies: Cif Future Land Use Map: Cv] Population Densities, Building Intensities and Growth Projections 121 Urban Growth Area(UGA) Review Cif Accommodation of Buildable Lands Guidelines 11 Planning for Increased Physical Activity D Identification of Public Use Lands l 1 List of Acquisitions: the city has not identified any acquisitions that are neccesary at this point in time. This plan does identify options for acquisition in both the Land Use Element(pg,XX)and the Capital Facilities Element(pg. XX). Current facilities are consistent with the City's choice to outsource service provision in many cases. I 1 Identification of Open Space Corridors: open space corridors are depicted in the future land use map (pg. XX) and are discussed in more detail in the Natural Resources Element(pg.XX -XX). M Airport Compatibility: lands immediately adjacent to the airport (Felts Field) are zoned for uses that are compatible with airport i-xiii operations (pg. XX). Furthermore, the zoning ordinance includes an Airport Overlay to ensure land use compatibility. 2 Military Base Compatibility: this requirement is not applicable to Spokane Valley, as there is no U.S. military base within or adjacent to the City El Stormwater Planning:Spokane Valley has chosen to include required stormwater planning in the Natural Environment Element, and findings from that element are reflected in the land use map(pg. XX) O Designate and Protect Critical Areas O Protection of Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas El Address Natural Resource Lands O Address Forest Resource Lands El Address Agricultural Resource Lands O Designate Mineral Resource Lands O Consistency of Development Outside UGA HOUSING EI.1•:M1iN 1 El Inventory and Analysis of Housing Units O Goals, Policies and Objectives for Preservation, Improvement and Development of Housing El Identification of Sufficient Land for Various Housing Types El Provide Housing for all Economic Segments TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT El Inventory of Transportation Facilities and Services El Regionally-coordinated Level of Service Standards O Plan for Level of Service Compliance CI Existing and Planned Transportation Demand Management Strategies O Pedestrian and Bicycle Component: this comprehensive plan adops by reference the most recent update of the Spokane Valley Bicycle i-xiv and Pedestrian Master Plan. It also includes goals and policies related to multimodal transportation (pg. XX) and a discussion of existing and recommended bicycle and pedestrian facilities (pg. XX). O Ten-year Traffic Forecast O Identification of State and Local Expansion Needs O Multiyear Financing Plan O Discusses Intergovernmental Coordination O Consistency with the Land Use Element CAPITAL.FACILITIES ELEMENT O Use Levels of Service and Concurrency Standards to Guide Decisions O Inventory Locations and Capacities of Existing Public Facilities El Provide Adopted Levels of Service El Forecast Needs to Maintain Adopted Levels of Service El Identify Proposed Locations and Capacities of Capital Facilities El Identify Funding Sources for Six Years of Capital Improvements: this Capital Facilities Element includes identified funding sources, funding priorities, and other available funding mechanisms on pg. XX. Cl Policy to Ensure Future Consistency of Land Use and Capital Facilities Elements El Process or Criteria for Siting Essential Public Facilities El Does Not Preclude Siting of Essential Public Facilities: taken as a whole, the land use map (pg. XX) and the Capital Facilities Element do not preclude the siting of any essential public facility. LI Consideration of OFM Essential Public Facilities UTILITIES ELEMENT O Location and Capacity of Existing and Proposed Utilities PARKS AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT(Recommended) El Goals and Policies to Guide Decisions about Facilities i-xv IA Estimates of Park and Recreation Demand Il Evaluation of Facilities and Services Needs • Evaluation of Intergovernmental Coordination Opportunities: • Consistency with the Capital Facilities Element NATURAL.ENVIRONMENT ELEMENT The Natural Environment Element is not required and the Department of Commerce does not provide a list of required components for such an element. However, counties planning under GMA are required to provide a Rural Element,which should include a definition of rural character and development, language that addresses forestry, agriculture and other resource lands, consistency with other elements and measures that protect rural character. Some of these are addressed in Spokane Valley's Natural Environment Element, along with broad-based goals and policies related to environmental priorities. SPOKANE COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES Because GMA applies to cities and counties, the act places a strong emphasis on regional coordination. Under GMA, counties work with cities to produce population projections and to allocate anticipated population growth to local urban growth areas(UGAs).One of the fundamental duties of cities under GMA For more information is therefore to demonstrate adequate capacity, under adopted development on Spokane County's regulations, to accommodate the growth allocated to their UGAs. O CWPPs, see the 2011 update at Furthermore, counties must adopt Countywide Planning Policies (CWPPs) www.spokanecounty.org that provide direction to cities on how to address certain regional priorities. The cities, in turn, must ensure that their comprehensive plans are consistent with their county's CWPPs. Spokane County's CWPPs, last updated in 2011, includes a statement of principles that asserts the regional importance of continued citizen participation, preservation of neighborhood character, protection of the Spokane Valley-Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer, support for ethnic diversity, differentiation of urban and rural character, sustainable economic growth,and the protection of private property rights. Each element in this plan discusses the planning context for relevant issues and includes reference to applicable Spokane County CWPPs, i-xvi OTHER PLANS AND POLICIES This comprehensive plan update is largely based in the findings of the 2015 Housing and Economic and Transportation System existing conditions reports. These findings are interspersed. as appropriate, in their respective elements. Two other plans that were recently completed also function as guiding documents for the City's economic development efforts and Comprehensive Plan update, and are briefly described below. Retail Improvement Strategy In 2015 and 2016, the City commissioned a retail improvement strategy that Retail Improvement and could provide direction for Spokane Valley's efforts to improve local retail Tourism strategies are options. Key focus areas in the strategy include: maintaining and improving the 0 located on thequality of exisitng retail centers,filling retail vacancies, pursuing differentiation City's website at from competing markets, defining the local retail experience, incorporating innovative retail www.spokanevalley.�rg. projects in catalytic private developments and promoting //////i///ii//i/////// neighborhood-scale retail options that are accessible by walking, biking and driving. These focus areas are reflected in the goals, policies and strategies contained in this plan. Tourism Strategy In 2015 and 2016, the City commissioned a strategic plan to improve existing efforts to drive tourism and support the hospitality industry. Themes from the strategic plan include: participation in regional tourism and event promotion efforts, a focus on outdoor recreation and natural amenities, infrastructure investments that improve the City's "curb appeal", an emphasis on fami- ly-friendly events and amenities and improved branding and marketing of local programs and destinations. RIGOROUS COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Citizen participation in community planning efforts is a valued part of the democratic process, and can include organization and advocacy, political service, event attendance,voting and other practices. The comprehensive plan relies on input from citizens and stakeholders; hundreds of people participated in the engagement process and their feedback was essential. The Following goals for public and stakeholder participation were identified at the outset: • Enhance the quality of and support for the Comprehensive Plan through meaningful public and agency participation in the preparation of the Plan update i-xvii I I i • Balance the interests of our community with the interests of the state and �,/elf f ..*a� region Y 1111,1 r f y'h ". • Identify issues early and evaluate options for resolution during the . .'[ „ ; planning process _a-.. l • �', rr • Comply with all state laws and regulations related to public participation ,; 5 fEngagement activities included three open house workshops to support ' R 4,1 visioning, numerous City Council and Planning Commission meetings, a joint The"Vision Wall'allowed participants to express their vision for Spokane Valley. City Council/Planning Commission workshop to refine draft goals and policies, a thorough process to evaluate citizen-initiated amendment requests (CARs) co m,,,,,j,er oRpa,!i!„nl• and a public meeting to present the draft plan. WORTHY TRENDS AND BEST PRACTICES IC- Planning trends are a natural outgrowth of widespread demographic and ` I, .'" economic phenomena. To the extent that these phenomena are present in li .N i r Spokane Valley, new planning principles will also be appropriate. Some of the ti!i L trends and best practices that are applicable to the country,the region and the a j City are descibed below, and these priorities are present in the goals, policies Map-based activities gave participants an and strategies of this plan. opportunity to offer recommendations for specific places in the city. Embracing Sustainability Ems.,.-, ,. •, . As resource constraints become more apparent and natural disasters become CPR ' `( III ' ' ci "r more frequent, sustainable planning and design becomes more important. _ Effective policy can support voluntary efforts to improve energy efficiency and safeguard communities against drought, flooding,wildfire and other disasters. � � � "=-::::."--'7'..= Embedding Technology _- _ New technologies are connecting residents to their cities in exciting ways that _ j r ir- - I enable increasingly meaningful public participation and improved feedback Stickers were used to track community loops for decision-makers. Technology also exists to make cities "smarter,' preferences on critical ssues. improving resource efficiency and cost-effectiveness, Harnessing STEM The American economy is increasingly knowledge-based, and preparing the workforce requires a focus on science, technology, engineering and math (STEM). Educational opportunities in these areas depend on effective planning and the availability of key facilities; in turn, a well-prepared workforce allows a city to grow and maintain advanced industry clusters. i-xviii Modernizing Infrastructure In a time where budgets are constrained and infrastructure continues to age, it is vital to the competitiveness of American cities that leaders find ways to invest in critical infrastructure. This includes repairing existing facilities, incorporating cutting-edge technologies and funding and constructing new infrastructure projects, such as the installation of high-speed telecommunica- tion lines. Accommodating Demographic Trends The American populace is aging and diversifying,which requires new thinking for transportation systems and housing development. At the same time, planning for a range of incomes has become more important, with apparent impacts on these and other components of urban policy. Incorporating Density, Improving Walkability Density is a necessary component of urban living and a key to creating "Recent futures for our cities and regions. Taking a proactive approach to consumer incorporating new development across a range of densities and intensities can research shows that... enhance neighborhood character,increase available amenities and supercharge thirty to forty % of economic development. households want to live Linking Multimodal Systems in walkable urban places, Population growth and employment growth has created traffic congestion yet only five to twenty at a rate that outpaces our ability to improve and expand transportation % of the housing supply infrastructure.This challenge,along with increasing demand for non-motorized would be considered options, makes it important to ensure that transportation networks overlap %, walkable in most and are well-served by amenities for all users. regions... By adding new ment to walkable development Creating Public Space p urban communities, they Places for people ensure that cities, even as they grow and intensify, remain livable for residents. Governments, whether independently or through thrive—more shops, more public-private partnerships, have a strong role to play in the provision of these street life, increased spaces. property values and tax [revenues],,, Christopher B. reinberger The Option of Urbanism(2008) i i i ////////////////////////////////////////////// itxix Toward a Vision for Spokane Valley The City has an adopted vision statement that guides its planning and economic development efforts. That vision was vetted and reaffirmed by citizens and other stakeholders throughout the community engagement process. Through that process, several key themes related to the vision were also identified, which are listed below and incorporated into the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. A community of opportunity where individuals and families can grow and play and businesses will flourish and prosper. KEY THEMES The vision activities helped staff understand citizen priorities and distill themes to guide policy development.Those themes are presented below. Community Character • Focus on City Hall • Improve Community Identity • Leverage Local Trails • Focus on Parks Economic Opportunity • Creating Special Places • Focus on Existing Commercial and Industrial Areas • Harness Opportunities around Public Facilities i-xx • Leverage Community Assets • Maintain Fiscal Responsibility • Concern over Code Enforcement Housing • Housing Affordability • Housing for Seniors • New and Different Housing Types • More and Better Amenities • Preservation of Neighborhood Character Transportation • Level of Service Policy is Working • Improve Multimodal Connections and Safety • Focus on Maintenance and Technology • Improve Freight Movement and Safety • Invest in Streetscape and Community Character i-xxi THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK. i-xxii l s CHAPTER 2 1,1 11 11 CY I & Si'rat eigy 1 l //r „// 4!/!/!!!!//1//Jf/JJ!/!//J/f!/f✓!J✓//✓///f✓✓/////////✓/!!1!!J/f/!//J/!J/!f/J///J!////JJJlJ1!////J/J/!!l////!✓/J/!/!///J!J//!!1J/JJ!!////////JJ////Jf/////! Policy Plan This chapter presents the goals, policies and strategies that will guide the City's efforts in realizing the community's vision. For the purposes of the Comprehensive Plan, goals are broad statements of purpose, policies provide specific direction to City staff, and strategies represent initial, concrete actions to direct implementation. Strategies are not binding components of the Comprehensive Plan, but rather offer opportunities for action and linkages to other plans and policies. 0:0 Economic Development 2-25 111( `) Land Use 2-27 666-1 Transportation 2-29 (j.fti1) Housing 2-31 all Capital Facilities and Public Services 2-32 ( 0) 6.0 Public and Private Utilities 2-34 _ ___.) Parks and Open Space 2-35 i t 0Natural Resources 2-36 2-24 _47) Economic Development GOALS ED-G1 Support economic opportunities and employment growth for Spokane Valley. ED-G2 Create and cultivate a City brand that supports economic growth and leverages existing community,economic and natural assets. ED-G3 Balance economic development with community development priorities and fiscal sustainability. ED-G4 Collaborate with relevant economic development stakeholders, including the business community, to grow a strong and healthy regional economy. ED-G5 Support and encourage the development of a strong workforce that is globally competitive and responds to the changing needs of the workplace. ED-G6 Maintain a positive business climate that strives for flexibility, predictability and stability. POLICIES ED-Pi Work collaboratively with the private sector to support catalytic development projects that are consistent with the City's vision. STRATEGIES > Undertake a comprehensive ED-P2 Identify and encourage business and employment growth in new branding process to create and and innovative industries and occupations. j market an identity for Spokane • Valley that sells the City's ED-P3 Encourage businesses that provide jobs and grow local markets. % inherent assets to would-be residents,employers and ED-P4 Promote key retail, office and industrial opportunity sites, as visitors identified in the City's economic development studies and other > Explore temporary partnerships planning documents (e.g Certified Sites), • with billboard owners to fill unused billboards with tour- / ism-related content until the ED-P5 Promote Spokane Valley as a great place to work, visit and do i boards are leased business. > Continue participation in ED-P6 Promote the development or redevelopment of vacant and regional tourism-promotion underutilized properties, particularly those with potential to serve as • efforts and increase the City's • presence in regional events a catalyst for economic development. 2-25 ED-P7 Implement strategies that are intended to create new attractions and STRATEGIES events that assert Spokane Valley's presence as a tourist destination. > Publicize retailers and re- tail oriented events ED-P8 Provide and maintain an infrastructure system that supports Spokane Valley's economic development priorities. > Evaluate the ROI of investment in tourism ED-P9 Invest in long-term improvements to make the City a more attractive anchors and allocate available tourist destination. funds according to the findings ED-P10 Enable the creation and retention of home-based businesses that > Promote regional athletic are consistent with neighborhood character. events and attempt to host prominent events at Spokane ED-P11 Leverage federal, state, and regional economic development Valley facilities;focus on developing a niche In faml resources and programs for City economic development purposes. ly-friendly or youth sports ED-P12 Leverage community assets (e.g. trails, natural amenities and > Implement a'night out" facilities) to grow the local economy. program to encourage neighborhood social ED-P13 Implement strategies that are intended to sustain Spokane Valley's • functions and highlight local retailers existing high value and high volume tourism segments. > Leverage natural assets and ED-P14 Pursue opportunities for creating public-private partnerships that amenities for economic will advance the City's economic development goals. development and marketing > Consider using GIS and ED-P15 Pursue technology-based solutions that improve assistance to web-based technologies businesses. to develop a platform that • matches developers with ED-P16 Support local educational institutions in the development of available land and retailers educational and training programs that meet the needs of businesses. with vacant space > Intensify targeted retail ED-P17 Engage local businesses to understand their needs and to assist in recruitment efforts future growth. > Evaluate local interest in positive, City ED-P18 Provide accesible and customer-oriented and public the creation of a Business Improvement District services. > Conduct a market analysis and initial business planning • fora local farmers'market > Use social media effectively to communicate economic development messages • > Work with companies in the wine and beverage cluster to expand,improve and market • offerings ////////!//%//////////////////////////////////// 2-26 mei Land Use GOALS LU-G1 Maintain and enhance the character and quality of life in Spokane Valley. LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees and visitors. LU-G3 Support the transformation of commercial, industrial and mixed-use areas into accessible districts that attract economic activity. LU-G4 Ensure that land use plans, regulations, review processes and infrastructure improvements support economic growth and vitality, POLICIES LU-Pi Enable neighborhood-scale commercial uses in residential areas. • STRATEGIES LU-P2 Support unique, high-quality and locally-owned retail in appropriate > Revise multifamily development locations. regulations and increase density • limits,especially in transit LU-P3 Preserve the public natural Features and amenities that make // corridors and in mixed-use Spokane Valley attractive to residents and business owners. j zones LU-P4 Enable the creation of common open spaces in neighborhoods, ' Permit and encourage cottages, accessory dwelling units and • other high-density single family LU-P5 Ensure compatibility between adjacent residential and commercial f housing typologies or industrial uses by regulating height,scale, setbacks and buffers. > Rezone commercial corridors LU-P6 Support neighborhood efforts to sustainably cultivate produce. to allow a broader mix of uses, including retail and multifamily residential LU-P7 Protect residential neighborhoods from incompatible land uses and rr adverse impacts associated with transportation corridors. > Revise the NC zone to • improve the performance and LU-PEI Ensure that neighborhoods are served by safe and convenient accessibility of neighborhood commercial uses in residential motorized and non-motorized transportation routes. • areas LU-P9 Provide supportive regulations for new and innovative development > Revise industrial zoning types on commercial, industrial and mixed-use land, • designations to allow for and encourage"local production" LU-P10 Ensure that freight-intensive operations have convenient access to • uses and"make-in-back, • sell-in-front"operations designated truck routes and intermodal terminals, ////////rliti/////iriii//ri////rrirririiiiirr 2-27 LU-P11 Support the remediation of environmentally-contaminated sites to STRATEGIES return the land to productive use. r > Streamline permitting procedures based on feedback LU-P12 Maintain a robust supply of productive industrial land from business and land owners, developers,etc. LU-P13 Work collaboratively with landowners and developers that seek to provide mixed-use residential projects. f > Consider land use alternatives for areas already saturated • with retail,especially if current • retailers are underperforming LU P14 Enable a variety of housing types. LU-P15 Encourage development in commercial and mixed-use zones by > Evaluate parking standards and reducing parking requirements. uirements. reduce the amount of required parking if feasible LU-P16 Maximize the density of development along major transit corridors > Allow mixed-use retail and light and near transit centers. / industrial near the Spokane County Fairgrounds and Avista LU-P17 Enable voluntary efforts by local home and business owners • Stadium to improve energy performance and produce or use sources of ▪ > Provide supporting retail and renewable energy. services near the Plante's Ferry sports complex LU-P18 Enable public open spaces. • > Ensure that lodging and LU-P19 Identify and assess opportunities to annex lands within the UGA hospitality centers are that will benefit Spokane Valley. well-served with zoning that • allows the development of tourist amenities(e.g. / restaurants) > Collaborate with the private sector to ensure the succesful redevelopment of vacant land at Mirabeau Point ///////r///////////////////////////////J/////// 2-28 . 666 Transportation GOALS T-G1 Ensure that the transportation system and investments in transportation infrastructure are designed to improve quality of life or support economic development priorities. T-G2 Ensure that transportation planning efforts reflect anticipated land use patterns and support identified growth opportunities. T-G3 Strive to reduce the number of serious injury/fatality collisions to zero. T-G4 Provide for safe and efficient freight mobility. T-G5 Maintain and enhance a comprehensive multimodzil transportation system that promotes, supports and improves the safe,efficient and reliable movement of people,vehicles and goods. POLICIES T-P1 Continue to pursue funding for the Bridging the Valley program to reduce rail/vehicle collisions, improve emergency access, eliminate vehicle waiting times, reduce noise, and improve traffic flow, j STRATEGIES T-P2 Consider neighborhood traffic and livability conditions and address > Coordinate multimodal potential adverse impacts of public and private projects during the % planning efforts with other jurisdictions to ensure that planning, designing, permitting and construction phases. Spokane Valley retailers and neighborhoods are well-served T-P3 Ensure that a robust street preservation program is funded and / > Identify,fund and fix implemented, transportation challenges that T-P4 Support voluntary efforts to beautify local and regional limit accessibility for Spokane Valley visitors,or that decrease transportation corridors. the appeal of Spokane Valley's key gateways T-PS Restrict high-speed traffic from residential neighborhoods. ////////////////////J///////JJJ!//////////// T-P6 Work collaboratively with developers to ensure that areas experiencing new development are well served by motorized and non-motorized transportation options. T-P7 Provide access to sources of current information about transportation options in Spokane Valley and the region. 2-29 T-P8 Support local, regional, state and federal transportation safety programs. T-P9 Provide and maintain quality street, sidewalk and shared use path surfaces that provide a safe environment for all users. T-P10 Develop a City-wide trail system that provides improved access and linkages between Spokane Valley's existing trails, neighborhoods and community amenities. T-P11 Designate appropriate freight corridors to ensure that streets/ intersections are designed to safely accommodate trucks and other modes. T-P12 Provide alternate truck routes to minimize the effects of congestion in major commercial and industrial areas. T-P13 Evaluate opportunities to improve multimodal connectivity in all transportation planning projects. T-P14 Identify and implement opportunities to improve data collection and performance monitoring for transportation in Spokane Valley. T-P15 Encourage all Commute Trip Reduction employers in the city to achieve travel reduction goals, T-P16 Provide a supportive transportation network for expansion of general aviation and freight uses at Felts Field. T-P17 Use transportation demand management techniques and technologies to move people, vehicles and goods safely and efficiently throughout the city's transportation system. T-P18 Invest in infrastructure beautification, including landscaping, art and walking paths. T-P19 Coordinate with SRTC and Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency on actions to reduce vehicle air pollution emissions through regular vehicle inspections and lobbying federal agencies for appropriate air pollution standards that balance public health and economic growth. T-P20 Consider evaluating multimodal level of service for Citywide planning efforts, particularly focusing on the quality of pedestrian, bicycle,and transit facilities. 2-30 Housing GOALS H-G1 Allow for a broad range of housing opportunities to meet the needs of the community. STRATEGIES > Change single family and H-G2 Enable the development of affordable housing for all income levels. multifamily designations to allow a broader range of H-G3 Allow convenient access to daily goods and services in Spokane housing types Valley's neigborhoods. > Provide code language that supports the inclusion of retail POLICIES and neighborhood-serving commercial uses in multifamily H-P1 Support voluntary efforts by property owners to rehabilitate and developments preserve buildings of historic value and unique character. /////////!!!/l!///f11/!/!///!I!!!///2/ • H-P2 Adopt development regulations that expand housing choices by allowing innovative housing types including tiny homes. accessory dwelling units, pre-fabricated homes, co-housing, cottage housing and other housing types. H-P3 Support the development of affordable housing units using available Financial and regulatory tools. H-P4 Enable the creation of housing for resident individuals and families needing assistance from social and human service providers. 2-31 Capital Facilities GOALS CF-G1 Coordinate with special districts, other jurisdictions, and the private sector to effectively and affordably provide facilities and services, CF-G2 Provide public facilities and services necessary to promote Spokane Valley's economic development goals and community priorities. CF-G3 Ensure efficient and cost-effective public safety and emergency services. CF-G4 Pursue a diverse set of capital funding sources. POLICIES 0 STRATEGIES CF-P1 Seek a balance between the quality and cost of providing public > Consult with retailers and other facilities and services, employers in Spokane Valley to identify needed capital facilities CF-P2 Optimize the use of existing public facilities before investing in new improvements that are critical to economic development facilities. > Update wayfinding and CF-P3 Coordinate the construction of public infrastructure with private signage for the entire City, development to minimize costs, and incorporate a consistent aesthetic or theme based on CF-P4 Require adequate emergency vehicle road access and water supply/ the outcome of the City's a g pp branding process pressure for new development within the City. r > Execute a progressive,citi- CF-P5 Coordinate with a fire services provider to disseminate information zen-supported vision for the about fire-wise development to property owners and land redevelopment of the area surrounding the new City Hall developers. > Maintain Spokane Valley as CF-P6 Ensure that facilities and services meet minimum Level of Service a clean and safe city that is enjoyable to residents and standards. inviting to visitors CF-P7 Maintain a comprehensive emergency management plan that meets > Identify and improve new and the needs of the City and coordinates with regional emergency existing access points to the planning efforts. Spokane River /4, //i. i/i/, /s//// CF-P8 Coordinate sewer planning with Spokane County. CF-P9 Support continued planning for domestic water needs. 2-32 CF-P10 Require new development to connect to public sewer and water. CF-P11 Identify opportunities to reduce waste and increase recycling in City facilities and at City sponsored events, CF-P12 Plan and build infrastructure to support the development of high quality retail and commercial projects CF-P13 Coordinate with school districts in land use planning processes. CF-P14 Coordinate with school districts to use school facilities as community centers and public facilities where appropriate. CF-P15 Evaluate a variety of capital funding sources including, but not limited to,grants, local improvement districts,latecomer agreements and impact fees to fund projects and programs. CF-P16 Plan and coordinate the location of public facilities and utilities in potential annexation areas. CF-P17 Coordinate with adjacent jurisdictions in developing capital improvement programs. CF-P18 Ensure that adequate library services are available. CF-P19 Collaborate with Spokane County jurisdictions in determining the best locations for public and private essential public facilities. CF-P20 Prioritize public investments necessary to support catalytic economic development and redevelopment projects. CF-P21 Support the conversation of irrigation water rights to municipal water rights. CF-P22 Support the inclusion of irrigation water rights when evaluating water supply capacity. 2-33 ( o) Private and Public Utilities GOALS U-G1 Coordinate with utility providers to balance cost-effectiveness with environmental protection,aesthetic impact, public safety,and public health. POLICIES U-P1 Promote the efficient co-location of new utilities. U-P2 Promote the development of City-wide communication networks using the most advanced technology available. U-P3 Promote the undergrounding of utility distribution lines. U-P4 Coordinate with utility services providers to prevent obstructions to regional utility corridors. U-P5 Require the placement of cellular facilities, substations and antennas in a mariner that minimizes adverse impacts on adjacent land uses and utilizes existing structures. U-P6 Coordinate with utility providers to ensure that sizing, locating and phasing of utility systems are appropriate for planned growth. U-P7 Participate in regular updates of the Inland Northwest Regional Pavement Cut Policy. U-P8 Encourage the construction and maintenance of utility, communications and technology infrastructure that will help attract business and industry. 2-34 , \ Parks and Open Space GOALS P-G1 Develop, grow, and maintain a diverse and accessible park, recreation, trail and open space system that enhances community character. P-G2 Recognize and support local artists. POLICIES P-P1 Support performing arts, community events and relevant facilities. STRATEGIES P-P2 Acquire land for the development of parks or the preservation of 0 > Leverage the Appleway Trail open space within the City's boundaries and adjacent UGAs. to improve adjacent business opportunities and create P-P3 Using the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, periodically assess spillover effects recreational facilities to identify potential gaps and improvements. j > Find appropriate locations to improve north-south trail P-P4 Implement innovative strategies for park maintenance, park safety, connections between key and park accessibility to reduce operating costs. j east-west corridors(including Sprague Blvd.and the Appleway P-P5 Design parks and community facilities to provide easy access for j Trail)and amenities on the north side of town(e.g.the pedestrians, bicycles,autos and public transit. Spokane River,Centennial Trail, Mirabeau Park) P-P6 Seek grants, private land donations, and other funding sources for land acquisition and recreational facilities development. / > Evaluate the feasibility and potential impact of constructing P-P7 Identify and protect regional open spaces and natural areas to form j a whitewater course on the Spokane River a connected network of active and passive recreation areas. > Collaborate with the Hub and P-P8 Plan for access to parks, trails and other open spaces in all � other local and regional sports neighborhoods. � facilities to improve and expand facilities and options P-P9 Support the inclusion of artwork from local artists in public places. > Evaluate the feasibility and potential impact of developing a P-P10 Support the voluntary inclusion of common open space and public % riverfront park or public space art in new development. / > Support the creation of an arts P-P11 Partner with public and private entities to encourage, sponsor venue in Spokane Valley and support a range of public activities and special events within > Identify opportunities to appropriate open spaces. incorporate public art in new developments or City facilities P-P12 Identify opportunities to transform land located in neighborhoods i/ // // into pocket parks. ��/i��/��iiii�� 2-35 Natural Resources GOALS NR-G1 Pursue flood hazard reduction while providing predictability for landowners. NR-G2 Protect the Spokane Valley Rathdrum Prairie sole source aquifer from contamination and maintain high quality groundwater. NR-G3 Ensure that Natural Environment regulations are based upon best available science and are consistent with required environmental policy. NR-G4 Regularly update stormwater management plans for sensitive riparian areas. NR-G5 Enhance riparian and large wooden areas throughout the City on public lands. NR-G6 Review, as appropriate and based on changing circumstances, the need for mineral resource land designation within the urban setting the City. STRATEGIES POLICIES > Communicate the significance NR P1 Model and delineate floodplain/floodway boundaries to correct of protecting natural resources inaccurate delineations. to economic development efforts that rely on natural NR-P2 Prepare and/or regularly update watershed plans for Chester Creek, amenities Glenrose Channel, and Saltese Creek. / // // // // /////�� NR-P3 Prepa re an accurate,updated map of areas expected to be inundated by a 100-year flood, particularly in the Spokane River, Forker Draw, and Glenrose Channel areas. NR-P4 Work with state agencies to improve natural resource inventory data within the City. NR-P5 Coordinate with regional collaborators to protect and improve regional water quality. 2-36 NR-P6 Ensure that emergency response resources are available in the event of a spill. NR-P7 Educate the public about the aquifer and River's susceptibility to contamination. NR-P8 Maintain compliance with state underground injection control and the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit. NR-P9 Update the City's Critical Areas Ordinance and Shoreline Master Program to ensure that planning for the City's natural environment is based on the best available science. NR-P10 Maintain stormwater plans to include inventory and maintenance of stormwater facilities. NR-P11 The City has determined that a mineral resource land designation is not appropriate at this time, but the City will enable existing mineral extraction and mining operations that are currently in lawful operation within the City. 2-37 1 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK. 2-38 / I__ / / / iiiii CHAPTER j` {� J' / I �d' ;t } ' Ecormc rl / 1f '/� il Deve © pmd / /.0/ /0/ i / ./ ,/ / / / / / / . ./ / / / / / / .. / ./ . . _ , / , // / i / ./ / / / i , r / / / / // /fiJ%i/if%%fr%///r/!j%.;%i)/%2/T%% "7' Introduction ,' 0 . WHY THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT * ! IS IMPORTANT Economic development creates living wage jobs, builds valued community amenities and generates additional municipal revenues that can be used to maintain service levels,infrastructure and facilities.In order to attract and retain companies,increase their productivity and grow the local and regional economy, effective policy from all other comprehensive plan elements is required. In that sense, the Economic Development Element is integrative, and depends on effective land use regulations, quality parks and recreation amenities, efficient transportation infrastructure, reliable utilities and infrastructure, affordable housing opportunities, sustainable resource management, and responsible fiscal policy. Put simply, economic development is intertwined in all of the City's services and roles and is reliant on a dynamic and thoughtful approach to land use planning. Proactive and innovative economic development efforts are responsible for attracting, recruiting and retaining office, industrial, and commercial and residential uses within a city. This element is therefore focused on harnessing market forces to encourage the implementation of Spokane Valley's vision.The Economic Development Element therefore provides a comprehensive overview of Spokane Valley's economy, sets policy direction for economic growth, arid / identifies strategies, programs and projects to improve the economy. REFERENCES I<EY PLANNING CONTEXT c Refers to other section Economic development is one of the fundamental goals under the GMA. As 9-114 in plan i / a whole, the economic development element attempts to merge the efforts Refers to other Spokane of the public and private sectors—the public sector has the ability to mold jSV Valley plans and official and influence development, but it is often the private sector that implements documents community visions through private investment, Moreover, the GMA stipulates that the economic development element promote economic opportunity for Refers to other all citizens, particularly individuals who are unemployed and/or disadvantaged. 1 0'�� non-Spokane Valley Lastly, the statewide economic development planning policies prescribe a references for further balance between economic growth and the efficient use of land and natural reading resources, which means that economic development efforts must be based in 4/ ///// sustainable planning paradigms. 3-40 The Spokane Countywide Planning Policies (CWPP) build upon the statewide economic development goals by calling for additional cooperation between regional stakeholders, including adjoining Eastern Washington and northern Idaho counties.Engagement with the widespread community fosters economic development in central business areas,and facilitates collaboration in planning for housing and regional transportation facilities. In the 2009 Comprehensive Plan, the City acknowledged that the local economy is largely dependent on retail and service sectors. That iteration of the plan focused on the diversification of the City's economy and increasing economic stability.Continued efforts are needed to achieve these goals and to create positive externalities in housing, transportation and other related areas. Current Conditions Spokane Valley has a diverse economy with a robust retail sector.Understanding this economy is essential to identifying challenges and opportunities for economic development in the City. SPOKANE VALLEY'S ECONOMIC DRIVERS Spokane Valley's share of jobs by sector is comparable to Spokane County as a whole (Figure 3). Both the City and the County economy are dominated by services,accounting for 54%and 56%of jobs in Spokane County and Spokane Valley in 2014, respectively.The City and the County also had similar shares of jobs in the wholesale trade, transportation, utilities, and construction sectors. Compared to Spokane County overall, Spokane Valley had a notably larger share of retail jobs in 2014-15%versus 20% in the City. 3-41 Figure 3. Share of Jobs by Sector, Spokane Valley and Spokane County, 2014 100% IMIIMMR71111..11 90% 80% E + i+Ag/Resources 70% 11110 "T. t�'i;• ■FIRE 60% ►+Manufacturing 50% Construction 40% r WTU 30% �., ;; Retail Trade 20% Services 10% 0% Spokane County Spokane Valley Source:Bureau of Labor Statistics QCEW, 2014 Note:Above employment is delineated by 2-digit NA1CS,where'FIRE'represents Finance, Insurance,and Real Estate activities and'WTU'represents Wholesale Trade, Transportation,and Utilities activities.The 'Services'sector encapsulates 13 different 2-digit NA/CS that include services industries related to transportation,warehousing, and utilities as well as professional, educational,and healthcare services, among others. Looking at the County as a whole, which provides important context for local data, the number of jobs in Spokane County remained steady despite some minor fluctuations between 2005 and 2014(Figure 4). The difference between the nine-year high and low-2008 and 2010, respectively—was about 13,000 jobs. In 2014, the County had a total of 205,700 jobs. 3-42 Figure 4. Total Employment by Industry Sector, Spokane County, 2005-2014 200,000 • - . -11" i Ag/ r ConstructionResouces 150,000 FIRE i Manufacturing 100,0001 11 1 1 1 1 11 1 Man Retail ■Government 50,000 Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 so ' v Co O N N W A Source:Bureau of Labor Statistics QCEW, 2014 In addition to minimal fluctuation in the number of jobs in the County. the mix of employment also remained relatively constant between 2005 and 2014. During the nine years represented in the data, the number of services jobs increased by more than 9,700 and government jobs increased by 1,400, In contrast, countywide manufacturing and construction jobs decreased by 2,000 and 1,700, respectively. Focusing on Spokane Valley, the top three employment sectors in the City were retail, health care and social assistance, and manufacturing, In 2014, these three industries together accounted for 48.4%of employment in the City. 3-43 Employment gains and losses is an excellent regional economic indicator and provides a sense of the region's economic trajectory. Unemployment in the U.S. Census-defined Spokane-Spokane Valley metropolitan statistical area (MSA) mirrored many regions of the state over the last decade,with a dramatic loss of jobs starting in 2008 and a steady if not consistent recovery beginning around 2011 {Figure X), At the peak of the recession, 27,300 individuals were unemployed (in 2010), accounting for an unemployment rate of 10,4%. In 2015, the unemployment rate was comparable to the 2004 rate-6,6% in 2015 compared to 6.8%in 2004. Figure 5. Average Unemployment by Year, Spokane-Spokane Valley MSA, 2005-2014 300002720 0.11 25710 125249.83333 25000 t 123670 0.09 21060 20000 17660 0.07 16560 16140 15140 15000 1416014340 0.05 10000 0.03 5000 0.01 0 -0.01 N N N N N N NN N O O O O O Q O O O O O O OV sO O Y N W A I -. Total Unemployment Unemployment Rate Source: Washington State Employment Security Deportment, 2015 3-44 Spokane Valley has a major retail presence in the region, which includes a diverse range of establishments. In terms of the number of establishments within the City, the largest percentage (19%) of retail offerings in Spokane Valley are food service and drinking places (Figure 5). Miscellaneous store retailers (representing a broad mix of typically smaller-footprint retailers) and motor vehicle and parts dealers also accounted for sizeable portions of Spokane Valley's retail mix-13 and 12 %, respectively. Figure 6. Retail Establishment Mix, Spokane Valley, 2015 m Food Services&Drinking Places 4030.02 0.02 Misc.Store Retailers Motor Vehicles Parts and Dealers l Performing Arts,Spectator Sports& 0 r 0 19 Related Industries 0.04 Food&Beverage Stores 0,04 Clothing&Clothing Accessories Stores •Building Material&Gardening 0,05 Equipment Supplies Dealers ®Sporting Goods,Hobby,Book& 0.06 0.13' Music Stores L.(Furniture&Home Furnishings Stores 0.06 •Electronics&Appliance Stores ▪ Accommodation HUG PT Health&Personal Care Stores nAiw 0.08 Nonstore Retailers I General Merchandise Stores Gas Stations Source Hoovers,2015 Another valuable economic indicator is taxable retail sales, which is not only a good measure of a City's retail environment. but also in municipal revenues. Motor Vehicles and Parts is the largest retail spending category in Spokane Valley measured by retail sales per capita (Figure 7). General Merchandise stores are also a major spending category within the City, representing purchases made at national-brand and big-box retailers like Target and Fred Meyer. These two categories combined represent two-thirds of all retail sales 3-45 in Spokane Valley. For comparison, General Merchandise stores also generate significant taxable retail sales in the City of Spokane. However, the largest spending category in Spokane is Food Services and Drinking Places,while trails Spokane and Spokane County in per capita spending in this category, thus illustrating a stark difference in terms of retail offerings between the two cities. Figure 7. Retail Sales per Capita by Retail Type, Spokane Valley, Spokane, and Washington State, 2014 (2014$) Retail Type $4,20/1 Motor Vehicle and Parts - $3,130 General Merchandise Clothing and Clothing I $940 Accessories .1 Sporting Goods,Hobby.Book tddroM14 5604 and Musk Building Material and Garden $1,086 Equipment 01 Spokane Valley Gasoline Stalions �� $246 Spokane Miscellaneous Retailers, $ 6 i Washington State Nonstore Retailers p AMIN Electronics and Appliance $540 t- I $1,51"1 Food Services and Drinking Places Furniture and Home $294 Furnishings am Accommodation l $323 $471 Food and Beverage Stores Ped ormingArts,Spectator $78 Sports $172 Health and Personal Care v; 'g b9 69 b9 69 un b+ 6 § § § o § S §d Taxable Retail Sales Per Capita Source:WA Deportment of Revenue, 2014 3-46 REAL ESTATE MARKET CONSIDFRAHONS Between 2007 and 2016, commercial square footage in Spokane Valley increased by roughly 700,000 square feet(Figure X). Industrial square footage has increased nominally, with development in retail and office-zoned space driving the commercial growth in the City. Figure 8. Commercial Square Footage by Type, Spokane Valley, 200T2016 Millions ■Office -w I idustrial rr Retail 12 10 9.19.2 9.4 9.4 9.5 9.5 9.6 9.7 9.7 9.8 87 la ■ II El III 119 IP 1 6 4 — 2 - 2007 2000 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2.015 2016 Source:CoStar Group, 2016 Office Historically, office rents in Spokane Valley have been higher compared to Spokane County (Figure 9). In the first quarter of 2016, however, the City's average office rent was slightly lower than in the County—roughly $14 compared to about$16 per square foot. Similarly, the vacancy rate for office buildings in Spokane Valley has been much higher and more volatile than the countywide vacancy rate for office property. Immediately after the 2008-2009 recession, the Spokane Valley office vacancy rate jumped from about 20% to over 32% and remained at that level until the third quarter of 2009. Since then, the office vacancy rate has fluctuated between 17% and 25%. Conversely, the office vacancy rate across the County has generally remained between 10%and 13%. 3.47 High vacancy indicates there may be an oversupply of office space in Spokane Valley. To address this oversupply, the City's existing areas zoned exclusively for office may be modified to allow a broader range of market-driven uses. Figure 9, Office Rents and Vacancy Rates, Spokane Valley and Spokane County, 2007-2016 Rent per Rate Vacancy $25 Countywide Rent 0.4 'ipo ,in°Valley Rent Countywide Vacancy Rate 0.35 $20 Spokane Valley Vacancy Rate 4 0.3 $15 0.25 0.2 $10 / 0.15 $5 0.1 0.05 $0 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Source:CoStor Group,2016 hidustrial Industrial vacancy in Spokane Valley has been volatile compared to the County overall. (Figure 10). Between 2009 and 2012, the vacancy rate in the City was subject to considerable seasonality—the rate peaked in the first two quarters and dipped in the final two of the year.Additionally, between the latter half of 2012 and the end of the 2015,the industrial vacancy rate in the City dropped from 15% to 5%. In the first quarter of 2016, the rates countywide and in the City were 3% and 5%, respectively. Industrial rents have historically been lower in Spokane Valley compared to the County. Between 2013 and 2015, industrial rents in Spokane Valley and Spokane County remained within $0.50 of each other per square foot. By the first quarter of 2016, the countywide rent was a little over a $1 per square foot higher than in Spokane Valley. While still low compared to the County, industrial rents in Spokane Valley have generally been rising incrementally since 2010,with the exception of a drop in early 2015. Despite indications of demand, with rising rents and dropping vacancy, Spokane Valley has seen little new industrial development since 2008. This may indicate that current new demand is utilizing excess existing space, and 3-48 that now industrial development may occur if these trends continue. There is a significant quantity of vacant and underutilized industrial land, concentrated The Capital Facilities mostly in areas formerly designated exclusively heavy industrial. Vacant land Element identifies in both industrial designations accounts for 46.4% of Spokane County's % specific improvements 7-XX total commercial and industrial capacity, climbing to 68.2% when including j slated for industrial underutilized industrial land. By updating industrial designations to be more areas. flexible, the City can be more competitive in attracting new businesses that //2///// may have previously been limited in finding space appropriate for their needs. Figure 10. Industrial Rents and Vacancy Rates, Spokane Valley and Spokane County, 2007-2016 Rent per Rate Vacancy $6 0,25 $5 A 0,2 villa Jj 0.15 $3 Countywide Rent Spokane Valley I{ent 01 $2 Countywide Vacancy late Spokane Valley Vac ancy Rate $1 0.05 $0 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Source:CoStar Group, 2016 Retail Spokane Valley features several major retail centers along Sprague Avenue and 1-90, including the Spokane Valley Mall, with additional retail space spread throughout the city along arterial streets. Although the City is home to a number of larger format retailers and major national brands arc well represented, the most prevalent type of retail in terms of locations and space are smaller scale restaurants, bars and other miscellaneous retailers. Almost half of Spokane Valley's food service establishments are considered fast food restaurants. Between 2007 and the first quarter of 2016, the rent associated with retail space was lower in Spokane Valley than it was in Spokane County as a whole (Figure X).At its lowest, in the first quarter of 2007, the retail rent in Spokane Valley was roughly $2.50 per square foot cheaper than in Spokane County overall, From 2007-2011, retail vacancy rates in Spokane Valley were higher 3.49 than the County overall. However, after spiking at 11% in 2012, vacancy has dropped to 6%, below the Countywide vacancy rate. Retail rents in Spokane Valley have also been climbing since 2013, and while they remain slightly lower than the Countywide rate, the Countywide rate has been relatively flat. These two points in tandem indicate a demand for more retail space within Spokane Valley. Despite this demand, there are areas where retail space is underdeveloped or in poor condition. Figure 11. Retail Rents and Vacancy Rates, Spokane Valley and Spokane County, 2007-2016 Rent per Rate Vacancy $14 0.12 $12 0.1 • $10 0.08 $8 0.06 $6 � V Countywide Rent 0.04 $4 Spokane Valley itont Countywide Vacancy Rate $2 Spokane Valley Vacancy Rate 0.02 $0 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Source:CoStar Group, 2016 The retail sector in Spokane Valley employed more than 9,600 individuals— almost 19% of total employment—in 2014, making it the largest industry by employment in the City (though not all of these emplyees are Spokane Valley residents). Spokane Valley's retail is spread throughout the City's major travel corridors where larger clusters are anchored by big-box retailers, such as Target, Costco, Fred Meyer, and Home Depot as well as the Spokane Valley Mall (Figure 12). 3-50 Figure 12. Map of Retail Land Use Concentrations & Trade areas, Spokane Valley, 2016v_7_,ey, -, „,- . .... . rti /4-,,,-7; l',1 HI , ii,:://, .t.',,./„.<.( _ _ _._ ' n f r'41' ., HitIwo. z z /J Atbertsons r• I • • ,--. Felts Field ri r' . - r; trv:b I ' V Argonne Viicge ' } i I ,a ,- ..Spekorevo'feyMall ShoppingCon ler ti,�r 90 - s_g,' I _ o E Mission Are ' �, I • •� rf 4�~ . � EI'1i5519n Ave '—'I La I s\ i`,� Walmorl Supercenter/ Liberty Lake y r -, '_.Safeway z �'_ ��- Lowe's S.oka . s y r E Qreadoay Ave ,n' LL.-.tee_.-.ice. -a”�� '2 -. — ,r. . - - r•-� ,iy i''''------ ,'� LLEKmarl f� �``z 1 z e VlincaFaod6 r{iis E vv '/ ,/ Z Fred tne•er _. �,t ESPrag reAa nc F s Iw�r .1-.r / r ,.y r-y . -r r E-. / r r _ � N -�'i-:Fp--T f` _, I'._ '"'� M--- l 5,0 _, Un}versity Target //// f' Costco/wp!rnorl/ r r� 'r' • Q .Shopp'ng Center !1 Fred Meyer - v.'• ,'r-' . � J y Home Depat/Lowe's 7� F i 1 q ElblhAve ¢ 1 i ♦ VV."- a ‘), /./I.-/- J A E -IN E32ndAve _ 4 J may Municipal Boundaries -- — 05ynK1nrVallry 'r1 � rr is E / f' ' - L2_Iw4sreVaIlLylhbrrtGre.diiArl:mlLJGA1 �dsh�,, —,-'. ----4-/41 1 Park,R.- .-al inz B OIx'n5j e �M. :f' i K Retail Uses _ i 'Rv 7/4/r lrrgd,[lcstaara�ts ' f ' Alin f ' r L_rr Ret.aiiAnr}i4rrcr M1Si;or rruanl, C.s a _ f�`/) tr.nrn fr: 0 0.5 1 2 3 0 C r, .1 s r r.m•ao::' _ Miles I Previous trade capture analyses (which measures the ability of local retailers to capture local spending power) indicate that Spokane Valley's retail establishments draw shoppers from throughout the region, and demand for retail space is strong. At the same Lime, the local retail market is dominated by centers anchored by big-box tenants, and retail sales have been relatively slow to recover from the recession. The community also desires more small scale, neighborhood retail establishments, which may struggle to compete with existing national chains. Generating "more rooftops" through increased residential density near commercial areas can help support neighborhood retail by increasing local demand. 3-51 I Oi.111S11'1 Spokane County has a significant tourism industry and tourism represents a major component of the regional economy. For example,direct visitor spending in Spokane County in 2015 was $947 million, generating $322 million in earnings, 10,040 employees, $23 million in local taxes and $41 million in state taxes. Although many well-publicized tourism amenities and events are associated with the City of Spokane, the City of Spokane Valley's ability to attract visitors and outside spending is an important component of the local economy. In Spokane Valley, employment in sectors related to tourism and visitation accounted for a larger share of overall employment than in the City of Spokane or Spokane County-31% compared to 23%and 26%, respectively(Figure 13). Figure 13. Tourism and Related Employment, Spokane Region, 2014 Employment 250,000 26% All Other Employment Tourism-Related Employment 205,680 200,000 23% 161,820 150,000 161,760 100,000 124,140 t 31% 50,000 21,980 15,120 .y;t.1.{r d 0 +.1t;r.10' ! NMI d Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane County Jurisdiction Source:Washington State Employment Security Deportment, 2015 3-52 Overall employment in tourism-related sectors is much less in Spokane Valley than in Spokane and Spokane County (Figure X), However, the share of total employment is much greater. In Spokane Valley, this is due to a thriving retail trade sector, representing more than 18% of total employment in the City. Additionally, the food and drinking services sector is also a larger proportion of overall employment in Spokane Valley than in Spokane or Spokane County. Spokane Valley's environment and natural resources are some of the most valuable tourism assets the City has to offer. Critical recreation amenities include the Spokane River, mountain bike parks at Camp Sekani, hiking trails in Dishman Hills,the Appleway and Centennial Trails,Mirabeau Park,and more distant features such as Mt.Spokane and Lake Coeur D'Alene.These recreation amenities draw numerous visitors each year, and provide a distinctive identity for Spokane Valley destinations(Figure X). The Spokane River/Centennial Trail corridors provide a major recreational opportunity for regional visitors,and the new ApplewayTrail extensions present opportunities to link recreational amenities with businesses along E. Sprague, the City Hall site, the Heritage Museum, and other community resources. Additionally, there is a significant amount of meeting space at CenterPlace, which is utilized for conferences and major gatherings. Many amenities and facilities lack connections,a notable example being the lack of lodging facilities within a walkable distance of CenterPlace or the Spokane County Fairgrounds. 3-53 Figure 14. Map of Community Assets and Tourism Opportunities )—,._— 1. ''''.;4°: F>/:////1/1 , - „ --"Ylir -1-1 :- . .. Nit i - / ,,/ -'"-I '\- Spokane Business rC E Emplr.:W: ' &Industrial Park ' - Felts Field 'I t ,.--'41; y .L 51 CenterPlace -.� 1. wk Event Facility 4a z La ç:: son A•e ;;L; I ane z1. n :— __-Eflc dway.4r:e R r J ._—.__ .a,� _ t =0 ez I �� Z Spokane Valley Library �j r 1.F.° . �" ` ' �� z J, ayalvtl ESpraaueA:e / CityHa71 /fr liu �� [Apo,- f Spokane Valley�HefitageMuseum I - .� S r Q r err ,....,..• al. °p O, r "_r... ;'....'5 ` ' i I — ',. t r a 1 rr/ , ,3 '',I s► EtSnAres 45;j _ r ,/, :///',/ ,,1 u— t 7 27 l N Spokane Valley Assets&Opportunities f' /f/ E Mundcipal Boundaries [ _ E32ndA,e ' / 1%4Slxt..”Wilk:et/0.mGrc,%thArca 0.1G41 s••' 0, .p6 l r'</ IP..i,Cng Shrc0 U.,,,,,['AI -•Prtg „cri 4harrrlllo Path '`anM' / //jtf gPriv. c.Srhanl1.35) L r r rza 5l).1:.,z1.•VaII.-y Rrtall Centrrs ,r tA Par1..5 Recreation.&Ort n5p.ce 10 therAss_:r{LabS:-J1 `"c.,. ':'„i"• 0 0.5 1 2 3 r. •..+ rx.a Miles 1 Spokane Valley's restaurants and retail offerings are essential amenities for visitors.Visitors seeking convenience or a more curated experience turn to the clustering of retail and services around other tourist draws. The geographic distribution of these amenities can provide insight into successful existing concentrations as well as areas that may be in need of amenities for tourists and residents alike. The Spokane Valley Mall is a major retail draw for the region, and has a wide capture area that draws visitors to the community. The E. Sprague corridor offers a significant number of retail options, including a notable number of locally-owned businesses. The restaurants located near the highway, particularly on N Sullivan Road, focus on limited service options that are co-located with an array of lodging options. 3-54 I I Challenges and Opportunities COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES Improve Tourism Offerings Detailed market data indicate that there is an opportunity to improve capture of Spokane Valley's existing high-volume and high-value tourist segments while expanding to reach new customer bases. This requires investment in local amenities and the development of new attractions. Ongoing strategic planning for tourism in Spokane Valley can complement this update of the Comprehensive Plan and provide suggestions for targeted investments with high return-on-investment for the City and its residents. Capitalizing on Outdoor- Recreation The prevalence of outdoor recreation options should be an economic advantage for the city, in addition to a quality of life feature. The area's vast hiking, hiking, climbing, fishing and skiing options should drive overnight stays in the City, and strategic investments in recreation infrastructure, as well as marketing of local assets, can bolster economic development efforts. Leverage and Grow the Retail Cluster Retail is a leading sector for Spokane Valley, but many residents feel that the City lacks smaller, neighborhood-oriented and locally-owned retail and dining options. Updates to the development regulations will provide retailers with additional flexibility, but the City can and should increase its efforts to grow and attract new and unique retail options that differentiate Spokane Valley from other cities in the area. Leveraging Interstate 90 Access Spokane Valley has strategic access to Interstate 90, as well as proximate air and container freight and rail terminals. Furthermore, the City has an ample supply of industrial and commercial land, some of which is located within a 325,000 square foot Foreign Trade Zone (FTZ) in the Spokane Industrial Park on SR 290. Spokane Valley should continue to leverage these assets when recruiting businesses to the City and should compete strongly for regional industrial development. 3-55 Support Commercial Growth The City of Spokane Valley serves as a major regional employment center and should continue to do so.There is opportunity to capture regional growth and to encourage development of high quality industrial, flex and office space to attract new companies looking for more affordable and strategically located space to grow and expand in. The City should focus on positioning itself as a cost effective alternative in the region and identify areas where office and commercial development can complement each other and take advantage of the City's unique suite of amenities. BEST PRACTICES & REQUIRED MEASURES • Promote economic opportunity for all Spokane Valley citizens, especially for unemployed and disadvantaged persons. • Promote the retention arid expansion of existing businesses and recruitment of new businesses. • Recognize impediments to economic development opportunities, and encourage growth in areas experiencing insufficient economic growth. 3-56 .j ,„ s CHAPTER 4 Introduction Mi WHY THE LAND USE ELEMENT IS IMPORTANT Land use regulations determine what can be built, at what density, and in which location. In considering Spokane Valley's anticipated growth over the next 20 years, the Land Use Element provides a framework to accommodate future development while enhancing the community's quality of life. In many ways, the recommendations of the other elements in the comprehensive plan depend on effective planning in the Land Use Element. PLANNING CONTEXT The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) establishes the Land Use Element as the required foundation to the comprehensive plan. Without first determining the capacity of local [ands to support different types of development, no other planning activities can take place. Under the GMA, cities are required to regulate the location arid intensity of land uses, and to establish a framework that can accommodate 20 years of anticipated growth within a specified urban growth area.Though specific regulations are included in the Spokane Valley Municipal Code rather than the Comprehensive Plan, those regulations must be consistent with the Land Use Element and other elements in this Plan, The City's previous Comprehensive Pian focused on encouraging more REFERENCES KEY compact, diverse forms of commercial and residential development. This goal signaled a transition from a purely suburban, auto-oriented development Refers to other section pattern to one that fosters more diverse, mixed-use neighborhoods. At the 9-114 in plan same time, this goal has not been fully realized; an economic recession and Refers to other Spokane continued market support for single family housing has slowed the transition. SV Valley plans and official However, community members reaffirmed a desire for more compact and documents convenient residential and commercial centers, where diverse amenities are located nearby. To continue moving toward this vision, this Comprehensive jRefers to other Plan update streamlines zoning and development regulations to allow greater sn non-Spokane Valley +�,J flexibility in commercial and mixed-use zones and maximize responsiveness to references for further the local market. reading dill//i. r//rri// //Art iriiiiiir 4-58 Current Conditions Modern Spokane Valley, which was incorporated in 2003, began as a diffused collection of agricultural communities. Residential areas were characterized by large lots,and commercial areas cropped up along highways and major arterials that connected residents to other towns in the Interstate 90 corridor. This original rural development pattern persists today,with single family homes and auto-oriented commercial uses predominating. Though development patterns in the City are changing,future land use patterns evolve from this historic point of departure. Typically, private development creates these more abstract development patterns, and development is constrained by land use and zoning regulations. "The concept of the These regulations balance the need to protect the health, safety and public / public welfare is broad welfare of residents with the constitutional duty to maintain individual liberties. j and inclusive... The In the U.S. Supreme Court case Berman v. Parker, 328 U.S. 26 (1954), Justice William O. Douglas indicated that the public welfare was broadly defined, j values it represents and that governments could use land use regulations to tackle a number of are spiritual as well .77 challenging urban issues. as physical, aesthetic j as well as monetary. Spokane Valley desires a safe,clean and vital community,and its residents also / IL is within the power value fiscal responsibility, economic growth and flexibility for the business community.These preferences very clearly inform the changes to the land use of the legislature to code that are advanced in this update of the comprehensive plan.Nevertheless, determine that the changes must first and foremost accomplish the mandates of the GMA, which COIT1I11unity should relies on the concept of channeling expected growth into existing urban areas. be beautiful as well healthy,as CONTINUED POPULATION GROWTI I as well ysclean, well Development in the Spokane River valley predates Spokane itself, beginning balanced as well as thousands of years ago with people of the Interior Salish tribe. In the 19th carefully patrolled./I century, several fur trading settlements also grew along the Spokane River. After the area was irrigated in the early 20th century,Spokane Valley's orchards Justice William 0. Douglas, thrived, and the population grew, creating townships like Opportunity, j Berman v. Parker, 32.8 U.S. 26 Veradale, Greenacres and Dishman. Several of Spokane Valley's current (1954) neighborhoods take their names from these early communities. //////////////J/////////////!///////f//////J In years when agricultural production waned, local farmers began to sell land for housing development. When population growth rapidly accelerated following World War II, the majority of Spokane Valley's remaining orchards were replaced with housing and low intensity commercial development. This 4-59 Figure 18. Figure x. Current decentralized suburban growth pattern continued through incorporation in Land Use by Acreage, Spokane 2003. Valley Today, the City offers a mix of residential and commercial uses, including 100% office, retail and industrial properties. Commercial uses are located primarily along major arterials,particularly Sprague Avenue,Argonne Road,Mullan Road, (,,I4✓:;, Sullivan Road and Pines Road. The residential neighborhoods between these 80% corridors consist largely of single family dwellings. At the same time, the city is poised to become more urban,with a growing stock of multifamily housing. • Single family residential is still the City's dominant land use, encompassing 60% 18.2% 49.7% of its area. Almost 15% of the City's land is characterized as vacant. 40% Figure 17 provides a breakdown of land use by acreage for major land use 11 categories. Spokane Valley has experienced steady, but modest population growth since 20% its incorporation, growing at a rate of about one % per year. Its estimated 2016 population was 94,160 according to the Washington State Office of Financial Management(OFM), making Spokane Valley the ninth-largest city in 0% Washington. Exempt/Utilities Multi-family Under the GMA. Spokane County makes a projection of the total countywide Industrial population and employment in 2037, and allocates anticipated population Vacant Land M General Commercial growth to its incorporated cities.The cities,in turn,must then adopt regulations that can accommodate this allocated growth.The County's current population Source:Spokane County Assessor,2015 allocation assumptions anticipate Spokane Valley's modest growth pattern to continue, resulting in a 2037 population of 109,913 in Spokane Valley. Growth may occur steadily over time or in concentrated bursts;annexation, for example, often accelerates overall growth. DEVELOPMFN [ [RENDS As noted earlier, private actors are typically responsible for the financing and construction of the development projects that execute the City's land use vision. Therefore, there are several market-based factors that affect the way a city grows. As Spokane Valley sees renewed interest in development opportunities after the Great Recession, these factors become increasingly important in understanding how land use regulations affect development opportunities. Generally, new real estate products have infiltrated many cities in the United States over the last several years.These products,which are less challenging to finance and build now than they have previously been, require that regulations 4-60 offer flexibility to developers that hope to create innovative projects. The following sections describe some of these innovations for each major use category, though additional real estate data is located in the Economic Development Element. Residential Many Spokane Valley residents have expressed a desire to maintain a stock of large-lot single family homes, and adopted zoning and development regulations ensure that this typology will continue to be available within the City. However, the largest shift in housing over the last decade has been renewed interest in multifamily development. This shift is a response to demand for apartments from young and old alike. Often, young people value the flexibility of rental agreements (compared to the long-term commitment of a mortgage); older individuals increasingly seek to downsize to minimize property maintenance requirements. Both populations have developed a well-documented preference for living in close proximity to amenities like arts and entertainment, restaurants, parks and open spaces, public transportation and even employment centers. This requires higher-density housing in central- ly-located areas, Multifamily housing doesn't meet the needs of every consumer, however. For individuals and families that require the space of a single family home but still want some of the neighborhood amenities mentioned above, new housing products offer a compromise. Specifically, troditional neighborhood or new urbanist development styles have increased in popularity. These styles are characterized by well-connected streets that are safe for pedestrians, cyclists and vehicles, varied housing types at moderate densities and robust public spaces, In Spokane County, Kendall Yards offers the most prominent example of this type of development, though Spokane's Perry District also illustrates some of these concepts. To improve access to amenities and affordability for residents, detached single family products like cottages and tiny homes are also on the rise. These small units typically offer a private space that shares a yard and are designed to increase densities in existing single family neighborhoods while belnding in with the architectural scale and character of the neighborhood. These increased densities, in turn, improve the feasibility of small-scale, neighbor- hood-serving retail projects like coffee shops and corner stores. 4-61 Retail Retail uses are also changing in response to some of the trends described above. As consumers increasingly prefer to live close to certain amenities, retailers are rewarded for embracing more urban models. This trend is visible across all retail scales, from the corner store to the regional mall. In fact, many shopping malls across the country have undergone extensive remodeling efforts to create a network of internal, pedestrian-oriented streets and to acid housing opportunities. The Spokane Valley Mall is still a retail anchor for the region and is very effective in its current form, but anecdotal evidence from malls in other cities suggests that, over time, some of the city's retailers may look to find spaces that are more easily accessible to consumers. Land use and zoning regulations must offer the flexibility to accommodate this range of retail development styles. Office Office development is increasingly shaped by two conflicting trends: many employees want to work in lively, connected areas that offer nearby food and entertainment,while others are using advances in telecommunications to work outside of and away from their offices. The market has responded by building offices in concentrated mixed-use hubs, where workers can meet social and professional goals, but also by developing new typologies, like co-working spaces, that provide a place for telecommuting workers to gather and share the use of conference facilities, printers and other expensive equipment.Again, providing flexibility in the land use code will allow landowners and developers to respond to these emerging market demands. Industrial For many reasons, industrial uses still remain less integrated into the fabric of surrounding neighborhoods. However, many modern industrial uses no longer resemble the smokestack-adorned factories typical of 20th century industry, and industrial employees also have many of the same desires as their office-bound peers. One way that new industrial development has responded to these changes is through the development of self-contained industrial campuses. These campuses offer a well-maintained and landscaped environment that rewards workers and attracts prospective tenants; noxious and unsightly economic activities are well-screened, and workers are provided with some retail amenities so that they don't need to leave the campus to meet their daily needs. 4-62 More discreetly, existing industrial areas have also begun accommodating non-industrial uses that are compatible with industrial operations. For example, breweries require on-site production,but often have a tasting room that offers retail sales; small, independent furniture manufacturers may choose to sell directly to customers out of a workshop or warehouse;a garment manufacturer may consolidate repair, distribution and retail in one facility. Though these changes are already occurring in an ad-hoc manner, it is becoming increasingly important to address mixed-industrial districts in land use regulations. FUTURE I.ANI) USE PATTERNS The changes described above may or may not be visible in Spokane Valley, but many are consistent with the themes espoused by City residents during the stakeholder engagement process. Therefore, the City is revising its land use regulations to increase flexibility for landowners and developers and to respond to market trends. The changes are discussed in detail in the following section. Changing Designations, Increasing Flexibility The revised land use regulations will provide a physical framework for the City's goals of expanding housing choices and enhancing neighborhood character while minimizing barriers to development. Some previous designations have been merged, and additional land uses have been allowed in new areas of the City. The Comprehensive Plan is required to include a future land use map, which depicts these land use patterns(Figure 15). 4-63 Figure 15. Future l.ou d Use Mop ' 1 -1 L — —Y` L, i \F '\lh— \I .- - [, Teti Field .,/-1 Ir _-- a ` t 4c,u •hf d f - - lllik, ]- s El ese,h,e � af- �� :: I v` —^ i`�� I; ^rt I *ir _13 Liberty Lake Soked� I _ -- — I a�` i - _fir et a.:..:,,166,1 " ;✓: 4 � 1�� Tom ar x•, ', I L� , _, . 1_ .,_6 Sp ate Are I 1 s• _1 G90 u4rrerg 1 -----I - "11 ai IF i� 1' 1 .I 1i1.. . ;NI ii iT1 i % \ti I i ' 1 1 I ;'� 1 4 4 r �, f Land Use :14x,, ] I _' kr-s<4' Alonlci�312cvr>ants 1�,- 5,2—u•1: f( J_— - ._-, UrdUse D€-ignati;n I --- _ Zy0 - - ` �.1. J 0 0-6 1 2 3 r 1-‘ riles __3 1 C-1 / ti ,,n T 4-64 The designations depicted in the map,above,are also described in detail in the table below(Figure 16). Figure 16. Figure X. Future Land Use Designation Descriptions, Spokane Valley DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION Single Family Residential(SFR)addresses a range of single-family residential densities from one dwelling unit Single Family Residential(SFR) per acre up to and including six dwelling units per acre.This designation would be implemented through a series of zoning districts that would allow a range of minimum lot sizes. Multifamily Residential IMFR)allows for multifamily development.Generally,this designation is located near Multifamily Residential (M FR) business and commercial centers,the arterial street system,and public transit.The implementing zone would protect the single-family designation through transitional standards. Neighborhood Commercial(NC)designates areas for small-scale neighborhoods serving retail and office uses. Neighborhood Commercial Neighborhood business areas should not be larger than two acres in size,and should be located as business (NC) clusters rather than arterial strip commercial developments. Regional Commercial(RC)allows a large range of uses.A wide range of development types,appearance,ages. function,and scale. It covers the"strip"retail areas along Sprague Avenue which includes the automobile Regional Commercial dealerships located along the western end of the Sprague Avenue corridor and the'big box"retail area found in the Sullivan Road area from Sprague Avenue north to the Interstate 90 interchange,and includes the Valley Mall and Wal-Mart. Corridor Mixed-Use(CMU)allows for light manufacturing,retail,multifamily,and offices along major Corridor Mixed-Use(CMU) transportation corridors.CMU recognizes the historical low-intensity,auto-dependent development pattern.It is primarily used along Sprague Avenue,and the north-south arterials. Mixed-Use(MU)would allow for two or more different land uses within developments under this designation. Mixed-use developments can be either vertical or horizontally mixed,and would include employment uses Mixed Use(MU) such as office.retail and/or lodging along with higher density residential uses,and in some cases community or cultural facilities. Industrial Mixed-Use(IMU)allows for light manufacturing,retail,offices,and lighter industrial types of uses Industrial Mixed-Use(IMU) such as contractor yards. Industrial(I)would allow all types of industrial development like manufacturing,processing,fabrication, assembly,disassembly,and freight-handling.Those industrial uses that may have significant noise,odor or Industrial(I) aesthetic impacts,are subject to buffering and transitional provisions. Non-industrial uses should be limited to preserve industrial land viability hut ancillary uses should be permitted to serve the industrial uses. Parks, Recreation, and Open Parks,Recreation and Open Space(POS)is intended to provide area for parks,open space,and other natural Space(POS) physical assets of the community Ccrlculcitiiig L.clrlcl Capacity To meet GMA requirements, Spokane Valley must demonstrate that there is sufficient capacity within its Urban Growth Area(UGA)to accommodate future development. To assess the City's theoretical development capacity, a Land Capacity Analysis (LCA) has been completed. The table in Figure X details the results of the LCA, providing calculations of buildable land, dwelling unit capacity and population capacity for each of the zoning designations that will change with this comprehensive plan update. 4-65 Figure 17. Figure x. Residential Land Capacity, Spokane Valley NET POTENTIAL POTENTIAL ZONING DEVELOPABLE NEW DWELLING POPULATION ACRES UNITS INCREASE Corridor Mixed Use 1,073 502 753 Industrial 3,456 1 3 Multifamily 717 3,062 6,124 Mixed Use 169 575 863 Single Family 6,891 5,643 14,109 Total 13,199 9,784 21,852 Source:City of Spokane Valley,2016 Spokane Valley has estimated capacity for 21,852 residents and 9,784 homes, giving it sufficient capacity to meet its 2037 growth target of 14,650 additional residents. The Land Capacity Analysis(LCA) is performed by first identifying developable parcels - vacant, partially-used, and underutilized. Next, parcels which cannot be developed due to physical, environmental, or social reasons are removed. After applying a safety factor, the capacity is estimated, and is shown in "Net Developable Acres" in Figure 17. However, out of total development capacity, partially-used and underutilized parcels may he more expensive or otherwise less feasible to develop than vacant land. A significant portion of Spokane Valley's current capacity is in underutilized and partially-used land. Spokane Valley currently has 4,349 acres of commercial and industrial land capacity, with the greatest concentration in its Industrial designation. There is a higher portion of vacant land across these designations compared to residential designations. 4-66 MANAGING LAND USE COMPATIBILITY Streamlining the land use regulations will,at times,allow different development types to locate in close proximity to each other. The City recognizes that without proper planning, this could create the potential for incompatibility between adjacent parcels. To manage this challenge and facilitate integration, the City is advancing a series of transitional standards that require development to respond to nearby properties. For example, an apartment building that is built near single family homes may be required to maintain additional setbacks from the property line, reduced building heights on sides that face affected neighbors, or improved landscaping to insulate the project. Though these are just examples, the specific transitional provisions are included in the revisions to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. These standards will ensure that Spokane Valley's neighborhoods and commercial corridors continue to demonstrate quality and character. Challenges and Opportunities There are a number of challenges and opportunities that have shaped goals and policies for land use in Spokane Valley. These provide some reasonable limits as to what the market can be expected to provide moving forward, as well as some opportunities to improve performance. Encouraging Neighborhood-Scale Comrnercicrl Development Spokane Valley currently lacks small scale,walkable neighborhood commercial areas,and the community has expressed a strong desire to encourage this type of development, but it faces significant barriers. First, Spokane Valley's commercial areas are dominated by national "big box" chains which draw regional shoppers. Small, independent retailers may not be able to compete with these larger retailers, and will depend upon local shoppers, often on foot or on bike, instead of the regional shoppers driving in to the national chains. This requires a greater density of households in the immediate proximity of small retail areas,and Spokane Valley's residential areas near commercial corridors do not yet have this density. In addition to making sure there are sufficient people living near retail areas, the streetscape should provide enjoyable places for people to walk and gather. With wide street widths and large parking areas oriented on the street side, Spokane Valley's commercial areas are often not pedestrian friendly. Planning for neighborhood retail should work in concert with planning for open space, 4-67 pedestrian, and bicycle improvements. The City's 2016 Retail Improvement Strategy provides a number of effective strategies for expanding the types of retail provided in Spokane Valley. Attracting New Development in New Areas In several areas of the City, parcels are underdeveloped and redevelopment has been slow to occur, particularly along Sprague Avenue. In certain industrial areas there is a good supply of vacant land, but very little new development. In all of these cases, there are certain economic realities preventing new development at this time. By allowing greater flexibility in its zoning, and allowing more mixed-use development along commercial corridors, the City is laying the groundwork to unlock the potential of these underperforming neighborhoods. Creating Catalytic Development The development of a new City Hall for Spokane Valley represents an opportunity to generate additional private development. Development regulations must allow for the appropriate mix of uses and the intensities that would create unique and diverse place surrounding City Hall. Furthermore,the City has other large developable sites that offer opportunities to advance the City's vision and spur economic development. Land use regulations should provide the flexibility needed to find partners to lead private development that is consistent with the City's vision, particularly on these large, strategically-located sites. COMMUNI YANU ECONOMIC PRIORITIES Supporting Economic Vitality and Diversity • Support neighborhood retail.The market trend indicating demand for more retail space is mirrored by the community's desire for an increased number of neighborhood amenities. Spokane Valley residents reported significant demand for walkable retail options within the community, both to enhance the quality of life and develop distinctive neighborhood identities. • Support a mix of land uses. Spokane Valley's industrial areas are an important economic resource for the City, and should be supported. At the same time, land uses should be flexible to allow for changes in market demand and innovative development approaches. 4-68 Maintaining Strong Quality of Life • Enhance local identity.The community has expressed a desire to develop more unique neighborhood character.This includes encouraging the types of development that support small, independent businesses, including mixed uses and greater density of housing in certain areas. At the same time, the quality of the City's single family neighborhoods must be preserved. • Celebrate valued public spaces and facilities. The Centennial Trail, which runs through the city, is a treasured local amenity. Improving access to and amenities on the trail and other public facilities will help strengthen a sense of community, along with encouraging physical activity. New open spaces are welcomed,and create a more beautiful city.The Spokane River, and other natural features,are important to the community. BEST PRACTICES & REQUIRED MEASURES The following best practices and GMA-required policies aim to ensure that land use in Spokane Valley goes beyond meeting basic needs to enhance quality of life, both within and beyond the 20-year planning horizon: • Provide sufficient land capacity for development to accommodate Spokane Valley's allocated housing target and projected employment growth, including necessary supporting uses such as medical, governmental, educational, industrial, and commercial facilities. • Utilize urban planning approaches that promote health and wellness, including physical activity. • Provide for protection of the quality and quantity of groundwater used for public water supplies,as well as other critical natural resources. • Plan for sufficient densities in transit corridors to support ridership and give residents and workers several motorized and non-motorized options for their daily commute. • Explore potential annexation areas and proactively plan for the expansion of the City's boundaries. 4-69 THIS PAGE 1S INTENTIONALLY BLANK. 4-70 o 0 f \\ CHAPTER 5 (-'4615 ' -r-'cTr; p . t #: hen r .. ., 1 . , „1 i .. Z t. Introduction 6143 WHY THE TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT IS IMPORTANT As Spokane Valley updates its Comprehensive Plan, an evaluation of existing conditions is being performed across a variety of topics from housing, to land use, to economic development. This chapter summarizes the existing state of the transportation system, This analysis is a required component of the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan and identifies how the transportation network and the surrounding land uses influence the way people travel and how convenient that travel is for commuting, shopping, recreating, and other needs. Based on this analysis and an extensive public outreach component, challenges and opportunities for the transportation network are identified that will be addressed as part of the ongoing Comprehensive Plan update. PLANNING CONTEXT The Transportation Element is shaped by several important state and regional laws and policies,as described below: • Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) identifies transportation as one of the required elements of a Comprehensive Plan. The GMA encourages efficient multimodal transportation systems that are consistent with the land use assumptions in the plan, identify level of service standards, forecast future transportation growth, identify new REFERENCES KEY identify and coordinate with other Comprehensive Plan elements to identify a feasible financing strategy. 0Refers to other section • Countywide Planning Policies are defined by Spokane County,the Spokane 9-114 in plan Regional Transportation Council, and local jurisdictions. Related to Refers to other Spokane transportation, the Countywide Planning Policies require that jurisdiction $W Valley plans and official plans be consistent with each other, include roadway, pedestrian, bicycle, documents rail,and air facilities.Additionally, the Transportation Element shall identify a transportation concurrency standard to ensure growth and transportation Refers to other investments are synchronized. Cnon-Spokane Valley references for further • SRTC Congestion Management Program (CMP)identifies several corridors reading of regional importance in Spokane County, including the Interstate 90, Argonne/Mullan, and Sullivan Road corridors in Spokane Valley.The CMP airrrriririri�ririisrrirrririiriiriiiiiiririiir defines a set of strategies to address and manage congestion on these major corridors. The intent of the CMP is to encourage economic vitality, 5-72 maximize the use of existing infrastructure, improve travel choices and access for all residents, and improve safety. • Horizon 2040 is the Metropolitan Transportation Plan developed by SRTC. Horizon 2040 is a long-term, multimodal "blueprint' for transportation aimed at meeting the mobility needs of the area through 2040. It is based on projections for growth in population, housing and jobs and considers all mode of transportation, such as private vehicles, public transit, bicycling, walking, freight movement, rail and air travel. As this Transportation Element update was prepared, close attention was paid to these overarching laws and policies to ensure that Spokane Valley's transportation system and vision are integrated and coordinated with the regional transportation network. Current Conditions TRAVEL PATTERNS IN SPOKANE VALLEY AND THE REGION Since incorporation in 2003, the City has witnessed significant growth in population and employment. With more people living and working in the city, there are also more people traveling to and from Spokane Valley on a daily basis. On face, these general trends emphasize the importance of investing in transportation infrastructure and transportation demand management (TDM) strategies, but understanding how people currently travel to and through the City is also important to establish planning frameworks that can responds efficiently to future transportation challenges. One of these frameworks relates to the arrangement of uses throughout the City, and is represented in the City's land use map. For example, clusters of commercial land uses are likely to generate higher traffic volumes during peak morning and evening travel times, while retailers may attract additional trips on weekends, when many workers use their discretionary time for shopping, dining and entertainment. Residential uses, at the other end of the spectrum, may prefer to be located away from major transportation corridors, or may have infrastructure needs that scale with residential densities. In this way, there is a dynamic relationship between land use patterns and transportation networks, with each affecting the development of the other. Other planning frameworks detailed in the elements of the Comprehensive Plan (e.g. capital facilities planning, economic development strategies) also espouse a similarly dynamic relationship with transportation. 5-73 Based on current land use patterns,population densities in Spokane Valley tend to be higher south of Interstate 90 and between Argonne Road and Sullivan Road However, some areas north of Interstate 90 and east of Sullivan Road have areas with dense housing as well. In some cases, these areas are part of larger Census tracts that include parcels of undeveloped land, leading to lower population density area-wide: Employment-generating uses in Spokane Valley are generally concentrated at major Interstate 90 interchanges, in the Spokane Business and Industrial Park and industrial areas south of Felts Field, and in and around the Spokane Valley Mall. The jobs in areas north of Interstate 90 tend to be more industrial in nature while south of Interstate 90 office and retail jobs are more prevalent. The map in Figure 19. illustrates the relationship between residential and commerical land use patterns. Figure 19. Map of Employment Density vs. Housing Density, Spokane Valley, 2015 � ' .. t ., , • . 1, i.i Ase'!. r^I 1 ':`,..ail.„. i y- ',ice ;,e:r- ', ,f' 1 i { r o • 1it, f y .U, • • r r r ,7, I ` 'I - fia� .. EEnWrreWri t •iyy` - - 1 v ..1. �=- �•1� . _sem �I � i �•f Fells F181d :-..--1:"!'111-'-- I' 7-•,.;r°` I t t .'1,�4? ..t1 • �•'' ii a r/ t�f- l ,.; t ,'- °�1I gp, --- ¢ ', Iff.! •i `' a roc .' . EM'ss;an Ave • :` ;.' `' J' ,7 ._•14� y nli EMlssian Ave • = II. I, l .I I �� ibe[�y Lake 4010010 '� r'1 I EBrOMteay Ave , M Lbp . , •• T• I r! slM . ccyQ' • z • I i ■1f5aa'weA,.e - I f' r i 1111. r i1 �x � I•.t I. a !'_ r— ._ � `� t4' 'i-a--'47:1—at I..�,�tr ,� ----'1114 ' A s , e, . it•. - -11,t1=_._-- 11'1 i ,,,'=IL l �4> r ;, Jt41r a I 1 E'i ,tr, y i >l ft-T. 1vI4 L.+ r • :jer71. . Er II Yi I \ Housing&EmploymentDensity �" p �— 3 t �� 1 1' t ( j �; / r/1 !�_ Municipal Boundaries iii �(/ " '-,,;/';) • trtr 04mFain^Vrllr-� • _.'�._ i`;:_In` �`v • !7`.1,71. �.• \. e"..''' .11;':.14'-',1';';:.y IP r/As,plane Valley llrl�a 1 Grci:.tEl Arc 1 llUGAI • ••• a • •{I�.''� itgiiii,i r I r '•. l ` l Pari,;.kccre.tic n.&Open Sp,cc .�r 'i 'f' +'•• a YJ Housing Type r:1 .erenhe.o \,\ , FI- 1 I t •illi J /1[,,,/. /.. ? }� Teo]to Foor Unit '• ` irk a-.LM. 44 r ._ .j•. 4 • F,c Ffu lh it giii ii& 'q ya ck i S i• •• • . • moirlo1L' � PJri.. f. 1 i^ � '. ,� /Il .r;tr .y i•, 1 • oti cr„,..:, ..„dE j4 1l1#� ,t , t*[1�p },; , ••. • Employment Density ' 1 , ' jr•' ... ..:,14,.. '1-k • „ ,1� • ail^ a 1 �r'.. I Ilya •• :i� � 7 .. . 1 FPI • CO L} .. .. r rir: •' • , ` ti{r• tr.•.r..Hn.; 0• 0,4 ;1' .. .2_ 3• • ' .r �4 rf t-n,f. p{ile�. Sources:WA OEM(2015);WA LSO(2015);Community Attributes Inc.(2016) 5-74 The map in Figure 19 provides some context for how land use patterns affect travel patterns in Spokane Valley, and it implies that transportation challenges may he alleviated when there are opportunities to live and work in transit-ac- cessible or other concentrated mixed-use clusters. However, many residents live outside Spokane Valley but commute to jobs within the City and vice versa. For these residents and workers who need to make regular trips into and out of Spokane Valley, the locations that they travel to and from are important context for decision makers as they prioritize improvements to transportation infrastructure. The maps in Figure 20 and 21 represent data from the U.S. Census Bureau's Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) dataset, and illustrate the number of all Spokane Valley residents that commute to jobs in other places, as well as all Spokane Valley workers who live in other places. In 2014, about 38,800 people commuted into Spokane Valley for work, approximately 22,800 City residents commuted out of the City for work, and about 13,800 residents stay in the City for work. Where clear transportation corridors emerge for these commuting workers, effective transportation planning is particularly important. To understand how well current transportation infrastructure responds to these land use patterns, this element will explore and assess the various components of Spokane Valley's transportation network. 5-75 Figure 20. Journey to Work: Where Spokane Valley Employees Live, 2014 • Employees'Plate of Residence \ r, fr r .a t , ; t :ss J .groi " rC��.� •)ii•, 7R/ I, t J' 1 1 1 /::. ' ; ij $ , ak / r /11 t.iunicip'I Bo Y1nelaries 4}':'''' .C .' 0( � a t y Ratntlrum Qi, [Y'f'.f t! ,.C1'-" #*. F . * - __ t 3 11~ i I i �� . ®i;:[f'f".9'Y:J•:f'�•:.t•%+•ef'J..:',"3,,,, — * ' 1 / f `` .4 • ,r 3 . t jI Li ;5:.3.?c-_3_: .LCT:i•i;±,-;.e F *` - , Hayden "t.JJ i `:it - *le, .4t- i*` . . ' - - # :' *PortFalls ' -�' s 1 n r1 • f' . 1 - �•`� . 1u" State . ^+ :PP • - I * * �* t �;®� 1. f _ r ;; rf*jYl1 •i•' ti Pf' Caeir Alene l.'• (,.� Spokane• s,�'Ir*r Ol0}}p! i'r I4*t* t:sv-= - \. J �� Ea MIIN3 ft * \ !° re�f1 #� +� rrii +1 B i i a, f ,_ �,J � I <t�* ,f1* r< � kale Ile itiN 1 r�kti i f , • ' ,ter�� L=, (( y �f _'i a _AirwayEE�ights r• f MtMll+{ ty� ( � j'4�1� 1r _t 7f .41,� Fairchlkl I �: ,�I t 1 * -1 * ,r !� V 0 , /,J . xf 7. Air Force Base=ao< n Inurotani_I'a:rPon „Alpej ,> .u+ � < • Y,. I r ,, 1 .. 1 i ''. .--1.!-,;;,, s 1F • r -a �+ ? 1` — _ l l 4 f- 44"6' * * . t r l' t f ' e J �♦ • i e1' A t , Yr .I �t Me,dkalak�e ?! I. J t 'v fl•. `1 �� l,t J • •" * .1f4rE ! + 'i{IiF' : ss a i I' f kill 1 R kford _ _ Re - i� y� ri a , °yet /J' ingle a _ �5 10 t is 1, .liifY „.s c,istt .� f G? I �h'.iLas` Sources:U.S. Census Bureau(2014);Community Attributes Inc. (2016) 5-76 Figure 1. Journey to Work: Where Spokane Valley Residents Go to Work, 2014 . \ Residents'Place of Work . . p .4) l• (...../Ratinkuna .{- , ' iii . , ,.7-, .„,...1,- t5:,• , I t Stlbi/1. ---"."11.-•.' ,....C.:vr adore '''', , ,,f- iis,40. • ,,,04,-140bs ii.J.,mil . It AM.112f.„1_ _ke I 1 ..., .. , Me\didA LA; - i' -.- ' 1.414! . id i\it' 4.,.,,,,i ., .if ' , ,f. . - . -s.,„, 10,. .. ,• 0 i 0 / 11 .,.."'" . :irif \ 'R Mord Sources:U.ICensus Bureau(2014);Community Attributes inc. (2010 Spokane Valley's Transportation Network A transportation network includes infrastructure to support several modes of tmospo,hdoo, including motor vehicles like cars, motorcycles and buses, as well as bicycles and walking. For the network to function efficiently, investments must be targeted to ensure that residents and workers have mUltiple transportation options that oiler affordable and effective ways to get around the area. The U.S. Census Bureau tracks how Spokane Valley residents travel to work—a statistic known as mode share.As shown in Figure 22,80.4%of Spokane Valley s'/, residents drove to work alone while an additional 10.7% carpooled. 3.1% of Spokane Valley workers rode public transit to work. Of the remaining 5.8% of workers who reside in Spokane Valley, most worked from home while others walked, biked, took taxis,rode motorcycles, or used other means. Figure 22. Figure X. Spokane Valley Mode Share 1,1% 0.4% \ \ill • 80.4% SOV -HOV Other -Transit -Walk • Bike Source:U.S. Census Bureau(2014) FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF ROADWAYS Streets function as a network.The efficiency of a street network is dependent upon how the streets are able to complement each other to serve different trip types.A griclded network typically provides improved connectivity for all forms of transportation by reducing the distance necessary to travel and providing alternative routes. Streets are described by a functional classification, which is a system of categories for streets and highways based on the character of service they are intended to provide. A proper balance of road classifications is necessary to effectively serve a mix of land uses and modes of travel. Spokane Valley currently classifies its roadways into principal arterials,minor arterials,collector arterials, and local streets. Descriptions and examples of these classifications are located in Figure 23. 5-78 Figure 23. Functional Classification of Roadways ROADWAY TYPE DESCRIPTION / PURPOSE EXAMPLE Interstate/ Highway Provide high speed,free flow travel between regional destinations. • 1-90 • E Trent Ave Principal Arterial A roadway that serves through trips and connects Spokane Valley with the rest of the area. • Pines Rd/SR 27 • E Sprague Ave Minor arterial streets provide inter-neighborhood connections,transit access,and serve • E Broadway Ave Minor Arterial both local and through trips.Can accommodate pedestrian and bicycle travel if there are • 5 Evergreen Rd sidewalks and bike lanes/paths. • E 16th Ave • Vista Rd Collectors distribute trips between local streets and arterials.Can be good for pedestrian Collectors Arterial • E 4th Ave arid bicycle travel if there are sidewalks and bike lanes/paths. • E 24th Ave Local streets provide circulation and access within residential neighborhoods,Good for • E Valleyway Ave Local Streets bicycle and pedestrian travel. • Long Rd In general, the roadway network in central and south Spokane Valley is composed of gridded streets, a reflection of the urban form typical during Spokane Valley's early development. Outside the major commercial corridors, the network is primarily connected via principal and minor arterials,with large gaps between streets and many unconnected residential cul-de-sacs and loop roads. This layout of large blocks creates a less friendly environment for walking, bicycling, and public transit since it can greatly increase the distance between a home and a destination or transit stop. The map in Figure 24 depicts Spokane Valley's roadways by classification, as well as other critical transportation infrastructure. 5-79 Figure 24. Spokane Valley's Transportation Network 4-h-. I _T, t eR^s rr.. - -- --'-- ----j_,' -:tri �....—,- " F __ 'i 1(0sotid ^ 11 0-- 2'' }Felts field t ;� j tE•EYr,.1-r ....-.-11 :w5 :'-rr i i 1 �� "-?" _ii E.!.!tC,A,t �,.— a ..� ..`— p - - '*K� _fr-- -- -- Lf6etry Lake I Y r e, _ —1 IL -- j ,,,,7":, ll• e o . , y—a_,-;.- --: cor - 90t — !{ - — �— l . i i 5P.'ar] '''j LI 1 1:i ) , .1 4 • r.%,:.,,,,t_r-- -l 1 Spokane Valley Transportation Network I 27 •.i 14 1 - -1 oiunicipal euundarie; ! 1 0 =<_-e.E _. III--- t` L--_t4rTr II ..._lA ,,.. n<partationbyClass ` — _ _ _j _ u�.c•AI3 I. �_,v J_ /_- ¢ I e 4j O _ K'•Eu �` 1._ •.-. ,1 �er-w Fei 0 0:6 1 2 ri3 acr,_,a E_ �,ait a ties f I 1 V.11- L Sources:City of Spokane Valley(2016):Community Attributes Inc. (2016) PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES Residents and visitors in Spokane Valley walk as part of their daily travel for many reasons. Children attending school, commuters taking the bus or connecting with a carpool to get to work, and senior citizens making midday trips all require safe pedestrian amenities. Sidewalks, crosswalks, curb ramps, and small curb radii are all key features in creating a safe and welcoming environment for people to walk. Furthermore, research suggests that people are more likely to walk to their destinations when those destinations are within a reasonable walking distance and when the trip offers an engaging and aesthetically pleasing, strolling environment. To that end, providing buffers between sidewalks and lanes of traffic, such as landscaping or on-street 5-80 parking, can also increase safety and comfort for pedestrians, particularly on arterial streets. The images in Figure 25 show some of these features on Spokane Valley streets, Figure 25. Photos of Existing Pedestrian Facilities in Spokane Valley Sidewalks are present on both sides of most principal and minor arterials in Spokane Valley as well as some collectors. The City has also prioritized providing sidewalks near schools, libraries, transit locations, and trailheads. While quiet residential streets may not require sidewalks for a safe pedestrian environment (with the exception of key routes to schools), some arterials lack sidewalk coverage, such as Mission Avenue, 4th Avenue, and Adams Road. Plans for adding to the sidewalk network generally focus on filling existing gaps on arterials. In addition to sidewalks and crosswalks along streets, Spokane Valley also has paved shared-use paths for pedestrians and bicyclists. The Centennial Trail provides a dedicated east-west connection along a shared-use path. The trail is part of a regional connection through Spokane and to the Washington-Ida- ho state border. The new Appleway Trail provides an additional east-west corridor for pedestrians and bicyclists along the former Milwaukee Railroad right-of-way. Spokane Valley is actively working on extending the Appleway Trail, and the City has also identified other opportunities for shared use paths along former and active rail lines. 5-81 Spokane Valley has a well-developed grid of arterial streets spaced roughly one-half mile apart, which is typical of communities built in the post-World War II era. While this system is efficient for vehicle travel, crossing major streets like Sprague Avenue or Pines Road can be difficult on foot or hike since signalized crosswalks are spread far apart. Additionally, crossings of Interstate 90 and Trent Avenue are limited and are often located at busy interchanges or intersections. These gaps in safe crossing locations isolate parts of Spokane Valley and lead to people driving for short trips that they could typically make on foot or via transit. The map in Figure 26 illustrates a range of pedestrian facilities in Spokane Valley, as well as recommended improvements. Figure 26. Map of Existing and Recommended Pedestrian Facilities � �zso 1_-- a .y — 1.ils5ood r• I _ /� -FdtsField " 4 - t --.:, j I _ _ _� _ I fj 7Ti _-E_,„:11 I t i1 .. EF'ssc•... � '�� .: - �- _ _ ..J _AP - [C\jiE- t),iic•A.t .,w��"' Ia_c r a -` ----— l , - 1 1, i'd-^1.T,_ ' - Erb .� s liberty Lake Sdokane _ ] -- = na.a.ri - I t 11. Ll. _ t> ' —1 dC - `) f _I . 1 7 li_3z-c'.3 I i.. � . I 11 .1- rt •• .,•• ., .31 .r' I 1, •,\ 1,4-..:.. (Spokane Valley Pedestrian Network IJf— r Iunicip?I EoundariesrriV a. ! 7 Ped-striantletvr7rks r --_,__ -».r _ ._ e.txv i. 1 ,. ,cmv r�, 0 17.6 1 2 3 ,, CVZSAdV,1,11 [ ".'t ,• ♦_1.1,17; FAles '/,r I l'./.1- ''` Sources:City of Spokane Volley(2016};Community Attributes loc. (2016) 5-82 EXISTING BICYCLE FACILITIES Similar to sidewalks, bicycle facilities are an important element in the transportation network that provide a safe and identifiable bicycling environment. Bicyclists in the City of Spokane Valley can utilize a variety of facilities, including shared-use paths, bike lanes, and bike friendly mutes to reach their destination as shown in Figure 27. However, gaps in the network create an environment in which cyclists must navigate through vehicle traffic or difficult arterial crossings to complete their journey, decreasing safety for motorized and non-motorized travelers alike.While the City has trails and bike lanes that form a spine of north-south and east-west connections, some of these facilities are not continuous and require bicyclists to merge in and out of traffic. Figure 27. Figure X. Map of Existing and Recommended Bicycle Facilities L ' '''4./- ?' \F-1--")—L-rali'- 1 • a .."-''' '..- ' . '. ,, ' ,•„:...„,„,' 44 0'' , r P _ j `' P. 'moo r•i 4 i ,,Y (:' 'Felts Field AX I t '' �-' -____��-"rte cv"r,er,,; i _ --- — ' y Efts C'AAt r- i ,,,a,-�"`.- _ [ _ ; "•`. _ Liberty Lake Spokane _.__--- - — - - _.... .x --- --- - /77_2 �,/- ll "'). S d « I :+er Ass i ! nl ,.(-- ''''1/44.4 '-] I Existini&Proposed Bikeway Network i I ,„, L_ - r•lunitipal Boundaries 1 d'u\I1,A!:3 lyBikeway Elemental N ' 2':-= t-_ a e=- ll r • sae■ -,-_ = -=_ 1. ., ;' •I --_.- •A -61+::%11.-61+::%11. - _ / z,1• D 06 t 2 3 4%R5 'tl tides I v. , r E..',.,. hide Sources:City of Spokone Volley(2016);Community Attributes fnc.(2.016) 5-83 The existing roadway geometry in many parts of Spokane Valley includes wide lanes, on-street parking, and a high number of driveways, which make many bicyclists feel uncomfortable riding in the street. Sonie corridors, such as Sprague Avenue and Mission Avenue, have striped bike lanes but also high vehicle speeds and volumes. PUBLIC TRANSIT Public transit, provided by Spokane Transit Authority (STA) via buses and vans, serves as a key component of the transportation network that connects residents with employment centers, public places, and regional destinations. Many Spokane Valley residents and employees use public transit for trips around and outside of the City. Figure 28 highlights the route and stop coverage of STA in Spokane Valley. Additionally, the map highlights the Pence-Cole Valley and Mirabeau Point transit centers and park-and-ride facilities that provide links to the regional transit system. STA operates one frequent bus route between Downtown Spokane and Spokane Valley that runs every 15 minutes during weekday peak and day times. This route, number 90, is the second busiest route that STA operates, with nearly 3,300 passengers on an average weekday. STA also has five basic routes serving Spokane Valley and providing connections to Spokane, Millwood, and Liberty Lake. Two express routes provide direct, high-speed connections between Downtown Spokane, the Valley Transit Center, and Mirabeau Point Park-,and-Ride. These routes serve 7,000 riders per day during the week and cover most of Spokane Valley's major destinations, including the Spokane Valley Mall, the University Shopping Center, the Valley Hospital Medical Center, the Argonne Village Shopping Center, the Spokane Industrial Park, and many area schools. 5-84 Figure 28. Map of Existing and Recommended Transit Facilities '.--"h__ f Ii� L' / {li �. I� }r 338 — r • ��.. • Spokane _ -,v,.x`3' �� _ '� i, er FHpField ..... I x—=a, '�h =k 1 3' .iI !fl,TTw1tL . hr+ iE� . I L Liberty r � «� "�90�isF. - Per- 'Pk" ,,._,,_,,r11111 4 LLL 1 r u L N: . II`L C i '.�,` rt E t o l.,a • F—•--f — 1 27 f - 1 ,. - r r . 'r-.. it . 41 - 1 }4577 .1 i L_,• `l J CE-ii O�,•A� ' , I . Spokane Valley Public Transportation !+ l... Municipal Boundaries -` o== _--_ , .. • 2. ,.: Sources:City of Spokane Valley(2016):Community Attributes fnc.(2.016) MOVEMENT OF FREIGI-IT Freight and goods movement is a vital element of the transportation network. Everyone is directly impacted by how goods are delivered to distribution centers, stores, and homes. Spokane Valley is central to a high volume of freight movement owing to the City's major retail and industrial properties. Trucks move millions of tons of freight via Interstate 90 and Trent Avenue throughout the region and across the state. Several arterials in Spokane Valley also support high levels of freight traffic, including Argonne Road, as well as portions of Sprague Avenue,Appleway Boulevard., Sullivan Road, Faucher Way and Broadway Avenue. 5-85 These corridors are all rated at T1 or T2 based on the annual freight tonnage they support. Enough freight travels over many other arterials and some collectors to qualify them as T3 freight corridors. These classifications are based on the following amount of goods: • T-1: More than 10 million tons per year • T-2:4 to 10 million tons per year • 1-3: 300,000 to 4 million tons per year The Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway (BNSF) and Union Pacific Railroad (UP) operate the primary rail lines within the City. Both companies have connections to the Washington-Idaho border while BNSF's route represents the company's main transcontinental line connecting the West Coast to Chicago and the Midwest. These rail lines help form the industrial corridor north of 1-90 that supports many jobs in Spokane Valley, in addition to the UP line that runs north of Sprague and along Dishman-Mica Road south through the City limits. To support freight mobility and improve safety at railroad crossings, the SRTC developed the Bridging the Valley (BTV) project in 2006. The ultimate goal of BTV is to separate vehicle traffic from train traffic in the 42 mile corridor between Spokane, WA and Athol, ID. The separation of railroad and roadway grades in this corridor—which includes 75 railroad/roadway crossings— is intended to promote future economic growth, improve traffic movement, and traffic safety. BTV is integrated into the Horizon 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan. AVIATION Most air travel in the Spokane Region is handled through the Spokane International Airport, located between Spokane and Airway Heights. Felts Field, a general aviation airport, is located at the north end of Faucher Way at the western edge of Spokane Valley. Felts Field currently handles about 59,000 annual take-offs and landings and is served by a number of charter services. MOTOR VEHICLES Most Spokane Valley residents (about 90%) use motor vehicles as their primary mode of transportation to work. Moreover, many non-resident travelers pass through the Valley via Interstate 90 or park at the Pence-Cole Valley Transit Center or Mirabeau Point Park-and-Ride and take public transit into Spokane. 5-86 The analysis of Spokane Valley's congestion for motorists is based on traffic counts collected in 2014. Each of the major roadways in Spokane Valley was evaluated based on its ability to accommodate PM peak hour demand with its existing width and lane configuration. Figure 28 displays annual average daily traffic counts. Figure 29. Annual Average Daily Traffic, Spokane Valley, 2014 _ ( cti:iL7A•A,a , ., , r, _ _ L. ,a f"{<< _� 'rl I`� `pix °'="h Spokane P -- �-- Ff '.sa I { 140? I - 445 L : r 1117 1 111 + • /.' Fells Field `'0 3 J4$ %. Mit a@4 .3:'R ,l� r .. .. 4 .. r - r i r iL44 c 5J Pl etiF.. '- x137 if Y t _ i !'fi.:.11 �' Y•}spf� SC, 131: 1 5575 4517 1131 El•!E<'A,k ). E,v ( f CIZ]GfFie 7.. - SF R ? G �� .,, x Ica.ti - c'�3_.1,h.t" s y77; t tn) 11311 i1J3 117E 2 37Oi >])i !sv J C 5 e � 5 - 4,71s� ya. -,--- 1 S 'C i i 5^E5:'t2 tic 27 ±S)„ '� ^ F 0.;a .. ,€r Jii.:17 7�.'.t z 5:' F Z F 1 17:95 ,,,. Y'51 1i;43 10173 1E7TP N 31J3 �i• _ ]ST{11'1�.Yi^'�r_..R �i L. 1 r�R ? �e7 11f q ty A 11L3 a it 1571 1:11 1351 nil Y 3637 ^ - tt_ I A J'1 5471 -f *1'n'. k77 nig `al raI j; ]717 L� S:ti . ..,, _' S 7' t '.X.'1 l'!! en .---i. 44 ,y , 9�E1tI3 Elm' F L .. y`13:•A.k h! ,...t SOME En A'.! Xi /. I, RI U74 19:j E bt1 v r--, �7 'pyi it113 x {sr+e s17: Spokane.VarlayAverage Doily Traffic ci-.;..,a \ {^' Car4i': M 'A71 r`{. lduniupal Eaund3ries �,1`• • — O c.e _'.a g} Z ,+ ' ter, s 17 '� F7]4=ce--,_c.U-_z-c-.•t-�:f':E= r % S -' - Average Daily Trafficr .1163 7 •33 :21.2x:_ rj} •j. d—;:.'1 le 4:11.. 1 • "ci;m¢e 0 0.0 1 2 3 0 ,A%IR r-s ,J ''.,).nA=_ Flies �!1! I ('/r s Sources:City of Spokane Volley(2016); Community Attributes Inc. (2016) The corridors were scored into one of six level of service (LOS) categories based on the volume of traffic they support during the PM peak hour compared to typical volume thresholds for urban arterial roadways. Levels from LOS A to LOS F correspond to a range of completely uncongested to highly-congested conditions. Figure 30 describes the LOS definitions laid out in Chapter 16 of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) (Transportation Research Board, 2010), which is the methodology applied to Spokane Valley's transportation network. 5-87 Figure 30. Level of Service Definitions LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTION A Free-flowing conditions. B Stable operating conditions. Stable operating conditions, but individual motorists are C affected by the interaction with other motorists. D High density of motorists, but stable flow. Near-capacity operations, with speeds reduced to a low but E uniform speed. F Over capacity,with long delays. Source:2010 Highway Capacity Manual. The LOS standards that must be met within the City are as follows: • LOS D for major arterial corridors: > Argonne/Mullan between the town of Millwood and Appleway > Pines Road between Trent Avenue and 8th Avenue > Evergreen Road between Indiana Avenue and 8th Avenge > Sullivan Road between Wellesley Avenue and 8th Avenue > Sprague Avenue/Appleway between Fancher Road and Sullivan Road • LOS D for signalized intersections not on major arterial corridors • LOS E for unsignalized intersections(LOS F is acceptable if the peak hour traffic signal warrant is not met) For the arterial corridors, individual intersection LOS results will be monitored, but intersection LOS will not for the basis for evaluating transportation concurrency or SEPA impacts. Rather, the corridor LOS along its entire length will form the basis for evaluating the performance of these congested corridors. The rationale for evaluating corridor LOS is to align with the SRTC CMP and to acknowledge that while some intersections along the corridor may operate at LOS E or F conditions, the overall corridor performance will be improved to be LOS D overall. This approach avoids the severe cost and property impacts associated with some intersection improvements,when other more cost-effective approaches could be employed elsewhere on the corridor. The LOS for major arterial corridors should be analyzed using the methodology defined by the SRTC as part of the CMP or similar method approved by 5-88 Spokane Valley staff, WHY NOT REQUIRE As highways of stotewide significance (HSS), Interstate 90, Pines Road (SR 27), and Trent Avenue (SR 290) have LOS standards set by the Washington State f LOS D OR BETTER ON Department of Transportation. The City's LOS standards do not apply to these j ALL STREETS? state facilities. A key question that often comes up is why the City's While the City's LOS standards are based on intersection operations, it is • Transportation Element would impractical to calculate intersection LOS for the hundreds of intersections reduce the LOS standard in around the City. Therefore, as is typical for many Comprehensive Plan /✓ some places.The answers Transportation Elements, LOS is summarized at the street-segment level. aren't simple.While Spokane In general, the intersections along the street segments can be expected to operate at the same LOS as the segment. Valley is committed to mobility 1,1 for all, there are practical Spokane Valley's roadways generally operate with moderate congestion on considerations related to some arterials during the PM peak hour, Interstate 90 can be congested during cost constraints,right-of-way peak hours, and some motorists may choose to take city streets instead of % limitations,and additional Interstate 90 to avoid congestion. This overflow can lead to congestion on multimodal requirements that roadways that serve interchanges, such as Argonne Road, Mullan Road, Pines • the City may not be in position Road (SR 27), Sprague Avenue, Sullivan Road, and Barker Road. Except for j to provide. these few instances of more severe congestion, most roadways operate within Spokane Valley's LOS standards. GMA REQUIREMENTS j The State's concurrency These congestion levels around the City are fairly common for suburban j arterials during the PM peak hour. The delay will be disruptive for a brief requirement means that the portion of the day, but is also indicative of a well-used roadway network. j City must be able to maintain Principal arterials that operate at LOS A through C during the peak period its stated LOS policy in order may be a sign of an overbuilt system, which can be costly for a community j to allow for development. to construct and maintain. These large, underutilized streets also can be a Setting an LOS standard that deterrent for other modes because of high speeds,perceived safety concerns, f is unrealistic for the above and difficulty crossing. reasons puts Spokane Valley in jeopardy of being able to permit development,which would • be counter to the economic development goals outlined in this Comprehensive Plan. 5-89 Challenges and Opportunities In the spring of 2015, Spokane Valley hosted a series of public meetings to solicit feedback from the public on a variety of topics, including the performance of the transportation system. During this public feedback period, the City collected considerable feedback on what parts of the transportation system is working well, transportation problems/concerns, and what Spokane Valley's transportation future should look like. This feedback, combined with the results of the existing conditions analysis, highlights challenges and opportunities for the transportation system,as listed below. IMPROVING TRANSIT ACCESSIBILITY STA provides public transit in Spokane Valley. However, transit service is minimal in parts of the City, requiring that people drive to reach their destinations. Several members of the public expressed a desire for more extensive transit coverage. INCREASING BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY Many residential streets do not have curb, gutter, or sidewalks. While some streets are low-volume and may not need these features, key access routes to schools,transit stops, and civic buildings could benefit from enhancements. Spokane Valley has a strong pedestrian and bicycle plan. The City has been aggressively expanding the trail network by leveraging regional and federal funding. Long blocks and high traffic speeds can make it difficult to cross major streets like Sprague Avenue or Sullivan Road. This makes traveling by transit difficult,walking/biking to stores, or traveling to parks and schools difficult. RELIEVING TRAFFIC CONGESTION The public identified concerns over traffic congestion in some corridors, including Argonne Road, Pines Road, Sullivan Road, and Barker Road, particularly around the Interstate 90 interchanges. Despite some traffic congestion around freeway interchanges, many residents consider the Valley's LOS policy to be working well - successfully balancing traffic congestion, access needs,and costs to build and maintain the system. 5-90 ENABLING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT The city has a robust grid of major streets and can support a considerable amount of additional private development. Good connections to the national freeway and railway network also support economic development opportunities. The city's economic development initiatives requires a transportation network that is efficient and safe and that reflects desired development patterns. ACCOMMODATING FREIGHT OPERATIONS The region's position on a major freight rail corridor increases the risk of train collisions and delays caused by at-grade crossings. Continuing to invest in rail infrastructure, especially where train and other freight operations interact directly with other travel modes, is essential. ENHANCING STREETSCAPES Several members of the public identified desired improvements to the City's "streetscape," which includes landscaping, building frontages, medians, etc. Suggestions to improve the streetscape included more street trees, building frontage improvements/more private landscaping, and "gateway" features in medians and public spaces on the side of streets. MAINTAINING COST EFFECTIVENESS Compared to other cities in the region, residents highlighted the good state of repair with respect to street maintenance.This results in lower overall costs to reconstruct streets and more opportunities to invest in other City priorities. 5-91 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK. 5-92 f/' " "\ CHAPTER 6 II 1( II I Ei II ;i ' .1 ) : ( 1� � i111 , C [ oh Introduction f� `1 WI IY .F1 IL- I I{)USING_; FLFME.NT IS IMPORTAN I. Ti , I 'I !1 I ) r� Housing is an important component of the economic infrastructure of a community because it ensures a balance of land uses and complements em- ployment-generating uses by providing opportunities for workers to live near their jobs, The availability of housing types that match Spokane Valley's job profile and enhance the livability of local neighborhoods is therefore an important competitive advantage for economic development. The Housing Element leverages key data to inform the development of goals and policies, which will set a course toward the city's vision of quality, affordable housing for all Spokane Valley residents. PLANNING CON I LX The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) stipulates that the housing element serves to encourage the availability of affordable housing to residents of all economic backgrounds, promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage the preservation of existing neighborhoods. Spokane County's Countywide Planning Policies (CWPPs) for housing are consistent with these requirements and place additional emphasis on promoting accessibility for residents to commercial and transportation centers. REFERENCES KEY In previous planning efforts, the City of Spokane Valley acknowledged the Refers to other section abundance of single family housing, and focused on expanding housing 9-114 in plan options for residents while increasing the availability of multifamily housing units centrally located to employment centers and commercial amenities. Refers to other Spokane Additionally, Spokane Valley aimed to increase the prevalence of mixed-use SV Valley plans and official retail and residential throughout the City's neighborhoods with the overarching documents goal of limiting auto-dependency and improving housing affordability. Refers to other The Housing Element works in tandem with other elements in this V non-Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan. It includes a data-rich narrative to document existing references for further conditions that affect housing availability, cost and quality. These include reading demographic trends and market conditions. The findings indicate challenges and opportunities for housing in Spokane Valley, and ultimately anchor the //////////////////I////I////////////////// goals and policies presented in the Policy Plan, 6-94 Current Conditions Spokane Valley has a similar demographic composition as Spokane County overall. The population in the City will continue to grow in size, and it is anticipated that the population will continue to "age"—meaning that the share of the population aged 65 and older will increase disproportionately compared to other age segments. Both the average household size and the proportion of households with children are decreasing in Spokane Valley. Additionally, the apartment vacancy rate in the City and County are comparably low,and lease rates for apartments are steadily increasing. Taken together, these recent trends indicate that demand for single-family dwellings is decreasing in relation to demand for multifamily units. The key data from this section are summarized below. • The majority (60%) of housing units in Spokane Valley are single-family dwellings built prior to 2000. • Spokane Valley's housing growth has been modest, but steady since it incorporated in 2003, growing at a rate of about 1% per year. About 6,000 new residences were added to Spokane Valley's total housing stock between 2003 and 2015 • Spokane Valley's population is aging. Between 2005 and 2014, the proportion of the population over the age of 75 increased by 2%, from 5% to 7% (Figure X).The city's aging trend parallels that of the county—the share of the population aged 65 or older totaled 15% in 2014 in both Spokane Valley and Spokane County. • Compared to Spokane County as a whole, the number of households with children is decreasing more rapidly in Spokane Valley.The percentage of the city's households with children decreased by 5.6%—from 35.6% to 30%— between 2005 and 2014, while the proportion of households with children in the county dropped by 1.5%during the same time period. • The median household income in Spokane Valley was over$2,000 less than the average countywide annual earnings. Additionally, almost a third of Spokane Valley's residents earned between $25,000 and $50,000 annually in 2014. • Residents in both Spokane Valley and Spokane County are cost-burdened, meaning that their housing costs account for more than one-third of their income. Renters and homeowners are notably cost-burdened, however, there is a much larger proportion of cost-burdened renters than homeowners. 51% 6-95 of renters and 26% of homeowners in both locales spend a third or more of their monthly budget on rent or mortgage payments, • The vacancy rate for apartments in the city is low and rents are increasing. According to an apartment market survey executed by the Runstad Center for Real Estate Studies at the University of Washington, the average rent for apartments of any size in Spokane Valley was $827 per month. Furthermore, the average rent for a one-bedroom, one-bathroom apartment was$812 per month.The overall vacancy rate for apartments in Spokane Valley was notably low-0,8%(Studies, 2016). Demographic Characteristics The demographic makeup of an area informs the market demand for housing size, type, location, and mix. For example, cities with large numbers of households with children will have high demand for single-family housing near schools. Similarly, housing demand in locations with higher proportions of single, young adult populations will be skewed towards smaller, multifamily units proximate to employment centers. As the population of an area evolves over time, the housing market must also adjust to match the needs of its residents. INCREASING I'OPUI.AHON & CONTINUED GROW I-II The population in Spokane Valley is growing at a slightly slower rate than the countywide population. Spokane Valley experienced almost 11% growth between 2003 and 2014 compared to the county's 13% population increase during the same time period. By 2037, the City is projected to have 14,650 additional residents. Though increasing population is clearly linked to demand for housing, population trends are only briefly summarized in this element,and more detailed data is contained in the Land Use Element on page 4-58. Cities,counties and regions can grow through natural increases(i.e.when births outstrip deaths) and by in-migration. Countywide, births and deaths remained stable between 2005 and 2015 (Figure 31). Therefore, recent fluctuations in population are largely attributable to people moving to and from the county. These "non-natural" fluctuations are referred to as net residual migration, and have been the driving force behind population growth and loss within Spokane County since at least 2005, 6-96 Figure 31. Population Change by Natural Increase and Net Residual Migration, Spokane County, 2005-2015 9'500 in Net Residual Migration 8,500 - e Natural Increase(Births-Deaths) 7,500 6,500 ii -500 1=1-462 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Source:Washington State Office of Financial Mortogerttent,2015 AN A(lIN(; POPUI_Al ION Overall, Spokane Valley's age segmentation closely resembles that of Spokane County.One notable trend in both the city and the county is that the population is aging. The share of the population aged 65 or older totaled 15% in 2014 in hoth Spokane Valley and Spokane County(up from 10%and 12%,respectively, in 2005) (Figure 32), This trend is reflected in younger age segments as well, with the residents aged 19 or younger dropping from 31% (2005) to 26% (2014)in Spokane Valley. 6-97 Figure 32. Distribution of Population by Age Segment, Spokane Valley and Spokane County, 2005 and 2014 100% Hi 796 6% 90% 8% 9% 75+ 80% 65-74 70% 59b ';0 (, 60% 1-10 40-49 50% 13% 13% 1390' C:v;' 30-39 40% 15°x6 30% 13°x6 .150„ 20-29 5-19 20% 22% 20% 2196 19% Under S 10% 0% 6% 6%_ 6% 2005 2014 2005 2014 Spokane Valley Spokane County Source:US Census American Census Survey, 2005-2014. The decreased prevalence of children in Spokane Valley brings the city in line with the larger county,where 25%of the population is 19 or younger.The city, therefore, does not have a significantly larger family presence than the county as a whole. These trends suggest decreasing demand for large, detached single family homes and increased demand for the types of housing that are both desirable and affordable to smaller households, including empty nesters that may be less inclined to maintain larger properties. Nevertheless, the city will still need to provide excellent facilities, such as schools, for families with children. Figure 39. Average Household Even with increased demand for smaller and attached housing products, Size, Spokane Valley and new single family homes will continue to he developed throughout the Spokane County, 2005-2014 county. However, data suggests that even as all of Spokane County ages, AREA 2005 2014 Spokane Valley's population is aging at a particularly fast rate. Multifamily Spokane Valley 2.47 2.44 units and smaller, attached single family housing products may therefore be Spokane County 2.39 2.45 comparatively attractive investments in Spokane Valley for housing developers that are active in the greater Spokane region. This finding is also supported Source:US Census American Census Survey, 2014 by the fact that while Spokane Valley's average household size has slightly decreased since 2005,the average household size throughout Spokane County has increased(Figure 39). 6-98 Market Constraints In 2005, the median household income in Spokane Valley was roughly Figure 40. Median Household $4,000 lower than that of Spokane County as a whole (Figure 40). In 2014, Income, Spokane Valley and that difference narrowed—there was just over a $2,000 difference in median Spokane County, 2005-2014 household income between Spokane Valley and Spokane County. $60,000tft co o Median household income has therefore grown at a faster rate in Spokane '4T y�q A H R1 Valley than in Spokane County. Despite this trend, median household income $50,000 i 0 N in Spokane Valley is still lower than in Spokane County as a whole by about $40,000 $2,200. The share of residents within each income bracket has also remained j I consistent during this time period in Spokane Valley, while in Spokane $30,000 County there has been a marked decrease in the percentage of households $20,000 making less than $25,000 (from 36% to 25%) and a significant increase in the number of households making $50,000 or more (from 38% to 51%) (Figure $10,000 33). This may suggest that residents of the county are experiencing increased $0 , upward mobility, or that the county has seen an influx of wealthy residents. 2005 2014 2005 2014 This change could also be attributed to the City's older population retiring, Spokane Spokane and subsequently not growing their annual income. In any case, the fact that Valley County increases in median household income in Spokane Valley have not lifted a Source:US Census Amer/can Census Survey, significant number of households into higher income segments indicates that 2024. Spokane Valley's housing must remain affordable to a wider range of income levels. Figure 33. Income Distribution of Households, Spokane Valley and Spokane County, 2005-2014 100% r nd 90% $100,000+ 80% V. '''' I V I { 'f' 70% ''!+ :,':' n$75,000- 60% $100,000 50% '/-,6');:".. 5 40% YZ ir,=, [2i;ir. PC b 7. ./44 5,00,000 30% 20% $25,000- 10% $50,000 0% 2005 2014 2005 2014 k'Less than Spokane Valley Spokane County $25,000 Source:US Census American Census Survey,2014. 6-99 I IOUSING AR:{)f:l)A[ Il_I !Y AND COST 131JRf)I IN One of the goals of the GMA is to provide Washington residents with affordable housing options. According to federal and state guidelines, a household is considered cost burdened when 30% or more of its gross income is spent on housing(including rent or mortgage and utility costs). Renters and homeowners in both the City and the County are notably cost- burdened-36% and 35% in 2014, respectively (Figure 34). The percentage of cost-burdened households in Spokane Valley increased by 1% between 2005 and 2014,while the proportion in the County rose by 3%during the same time period. This suggests that other locales in Spokane County are disproportion- ately driving the increase, but that affordability challenges persist within the city. In both the City and the County, there is a much larger proportion of cost-burdened renters than homeowners. In Spokane Valley, however, the share of cost-burdened renters decreased from 54% in 2005 to 51% in 2014 while the percentage of cost-burdened homeowners remained constant. The opposite occurred on the county-wide scale—the share of cost-burdened renters increased slightly, from 50% to 51%. The proportion of cost-burdened homeowners countywide also increased by 4%. Given that median household incomes are increasing throughout the County, this indicates that the average home price is increasing in Spokane County at a faster rate than in Spokane Valley. Figure 34. Cost-Burdened Households by Type, Spokane Valley, 2005-2014 60% 54% 51% 50% 51% 50% 35% 36% 35% 40% 26% 26% 32% 26% 22% n Overall 30% 20% I u Owners 10% I Renters 2005 2014 2005 2014 Spokane Valley Spokane County Source:US Census Arnericon Census Survey(2014) 6-100 Though renters are disproportionately cost-burdened, data suggest that Spokane Valley and Spokane County residents are increasingly more likely to rent than buy their housing unit. In the city, the share of renter-occupied housing increased from 35% to 40% between 2005 and 2014. This trend is visible countywide (34% to 38%), as well as nationwide. Several demographic and economic factors—not least the Great Recession—have shifted consumer preferences toward renting, particularly in urban areas. Figure 35. Owner and Renter-Occupied Housing, Spokane Valley and Spokane County, 2005-2014 100% 90% 60% ['Owner 70% (401;'' GYOccupied 60% Housing 50% 40% 30% 20% `.s.' w Renter 10% Occupied 0% - . Housing 2005 2014 2005 2014 Spokane Valley Spokane County Source:US Census American Census Survey(2014) The Supply Of Housing In Spokane Valley While demographic and economic characteristics of Spokane Valleys population provide insight into the demand for housing products in the city and the region, the existing supply of housing in the area is essential to identifying challenges and opportunities facing current and prospective Spokane Valley residents. The city currently contains about 50,700 total dwelling units. Almost 30,000 of those dwellings were built prior to 19130 (Figure 36). Roughly 15%, or 7,845 units, of the total housing stock was built after 2000. 6-101 Figure 36. Housing Units by Type and Year Built, Spokane Valley, 2013 20,000 18,000 17,604 Mobile Homes L+2+Units 16,000 14,000 13,363 u 1 Unit 11,916 12,000 10,000 7,645 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 — -_r - - Built Before Built 1960 to Built 1980 to Built 2000 or 1960 1979 1999 later Source:US Census Americon Census Survey,2005-2013. Spokane Valley's housing growth has been modest, but steady since it incorporated in 2003,growing at a rate of about 1%per year.About 6,000 new residences were added to Spokane Valley's total housing stock between 2003 and 2015. This is consistent with the aforementioned data illustrating the age of housing units,which reports a limited number of dwellings built after 2000. REAL ESTATE CONSIDERATIONS Though the Great Recession negatively impacted the feasibility of real estate development projects throughout the country, financing for new development is once again available and development activity is again increasing. Macroeconomic conditions will always affect local development trends,and are important since private development will drive any new additions to housing stock in Spokane Valley and the region. Multifamily units, in particular, were difficult to finance in many market areas, and the graph in Figure X illustrates this difficulty,as there were no multifamily units constructed in Spokane Valley between the third quarter of 2009 and the second quarter of 2012. Since the third quarter of 2012, however,the multifamily development pipeline has been relatively robust. 6-102 Figure 37. Multifamily Housing Units Delivered by Quarter, Spokane Valley, 2005-2016 350 324 n Units Delivered r. 300 256 • 250 250 1 200 ` 188 176 I 150 144 11 135 135 t + � 100 66 1 50 0 • 28 27 26 26 o ii 0lOrf-+i 0 0 A .O 0 0 IH '8 !JH U 00Hill nO ' O0` Source:CoStar Group, 2016 Market data also show that, though multifamily vacancy rates are more volatile in the city than in the county, rates in both geographies are quite low.Vacancies spiked to almost 15% in Spokane Valley in 2009, but have since decreased and have remained between 4% and 6% since mid-2010 (Figure 38). Spokane County, as a larger geography, is more insulated from the volatility found in smaller markets; still, vacancies increased during and immediately after the recession, but have since stabilized at about 4%, These rates indicate a tight rental market regionally and potentially suggest unmet demand for multifamily products. Even the aforementioned spikes in vacancy appear to be attributable to concentrated periods of multifamily development, rather than insufficient demand; though vacancy increased by two percentage points in Spokane Valley in early 2015, several hundred units had been delivered in the months prior, and the rapid return to 4% vacancy suggests healthy absorption of the units delivered. 6-103 Figure 38. Apartment Rent and Vacancy Rates, Spokane Valley and Spokane County, 2000-2015 $900 Countywide Rent 16% $B00 Spokane Valley Rent Countywide Vacancy Rate _� 1496 $700 Spokane Valley Vacancy Rate y 12% $600 10% $500 $400JA °. 8% $300App,41111j 6°10 $200 4% $100 2% $0 0% N N N IV N N N N N N N N N N N F') O O 0 O 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y N N H N p N N Cil A In en V CO '0 0 N N CO A Ln Source:CoStor Group, 2016 The average apartment rent in Spokane Valley was roughly $100 lower than Spokane County's average rent between 2000 and 2008. Since early 2009, the average rent in Spokane Valley and Spokane County have been generally aligned. As of the first quarter of 2016, the average apartment rent for both areas was approximately$800 per month. Challenges and Opportunities Several challenges and opportunities arise from a careful analysis of these housing data. The following summarize obstacles and impediments to quality, affordable and diverse housing options, as well as arising opportunities to improve housing in Spokane Valley, and underpin goal and policy development in the Housing Element. l'roviclin, For Cost-Burdened Resick :its While the proportion of cost-burdened Spokane Valley renters decreased between 2005 and 2014, more than one-third of all residents—owners and renters together—qualifted as cost-burdened in 2014. This suggests a substantial need for more affordable housing units in the City, with a focus on affordable rental units. Smaller multifamily units are less expensive than stand-alone single-family units, and an increase in their availability could alleviate some of the cost-burden Spokane Valley residents are currently facing. More than 50% of Spokane Valley households earned less than $50,000 in 2014. For households earning $25,000 per year, rent and mortgage expenses should be less than $694 per month; at $50,000 annually, housing costs must 6-104 be less than $1,389 per month. According to an apartment market survey executed by the Runstad Center for Real Estate Studies at the University of Washington, the average rent for apartments of any size in Spokane Valley was $827 per month in 2016, though two and three bedroom units likely exceed this cost by a significant margin. Moreover, when affordable housing units are located further from employment centers and daily needs, like grocery stores, pharmacies, gas stations, restaurants and other retailers, transportation costs for residents increase significantly through car ownership, insurance requirements and gasoline purchases. These facts point to the need for affordable housing within walking distance of retailers, employers and transportation hubs. {:reaLing Options For Nora-Family I louseliolcls As the number of households with children decreases, the demand for smaller housing options will likely increase in Spokane Valley and the county overall. Quality higher-density housing products, such as apartments, condominiums, townhouses, tiny homes or backyard cottages, would be viable opportunities for residents without children and retirees and may offer the added benefit of increasing affordability for workers in retail and services. Acconiinoclabng An Aging Population Aging individuals experience a decrease in mobility--many are unable to drive or don't feel comfortable operating a vehicle as their reflexes and eyesight worsen. As a result, aging populations are more reliant upon transportation services and shorter commute times to amenities and health services. Additionally, increasing age often requires homeowners and renters to downsize because of health concerns, physical mobility restrictions, and/or reductions in income (University, 2014). Taken together, the aforementioned forces urge consideration of denser housing opportunities in close proximity to jobs, retail amenities like grocery stores and banks,and public transportation. RespOndii3 -in Corrnnunity Preferences The housing stock in Spokane Valley is weighted toward single family units (61%). Low apartment vacancy rates and high rents indicate market demand for more multifamily units. Residents echoed the market status with a community desire for innovative types of multifamily housing, such as cottage housing, tiny homes and accessory dwelling units. 6-105 COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES ! lousing !)iver-si!y (uid AffordohiliLy ENCOURAGE THE CREATION OF MIXED-USE DESTINATIONS Regionally, Kendall Yards in Spokane has aroused interest as a relatively new style of development that embraces many of the tenets of a movement called new urbanist». Residents, as well as investors, have indicated interest in this type of development,which could anchor new regional retail, attract overnight visitors,amplify positive publicity and create new mixed-use housing options. IMPROVE I IOUSING AFFORI)AIZII.I"IY Substantial portions of the renter and homeowner population are cost-burdened by rent and mortgage payments.An increase in multifamily housing options would reduce the average rent for these units countywide, improving the livelihood of cost-burdened residents. Furthermore, providing housing options that meet the needs of local employees is critical to ensuring that local companies continue to have access to capable workers, ENSURE A RANGE OF I IOU SING OPTIONS FOR RESIDENTS As the city's population ages and the proportion of households with children continues to decrease, the demand for smaller housing options will increase. During conversations with Spokane Valley residents, the desire for new housing typologies--including cottages and tiny homes—repeatedly arose. From an economic development standpoint, these typologies densify existing single family neighborhoods while enhancing neighborhood character,and therefore provide a captive audience for neighborhood-serving retailers that create new jobs in the community and draw visitors from nearby towns. Neighhorhooc! Chcrma ter ENHANCE DISTINCTIVE NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER The Spokane Valley community expressed a strong desire for more neighborhood amenities,such as non-chain restaurants, boutiques, and local entertainment.These commercial features thrive in walkable, high density residential communities and may best be provided through mixed-use development,where multifamily units can improve the financial feasibility of the development project. BEST PRACTICES & REQUIRED MEASURES The following best practices and GMA-required policies aim to ensure housing supply meets the needs of Spokane Valley's growing and changing population, 6-106 enhance quality of life by maintaining housing affordability, and foster development of livable neighborhoods. These measures also acknowledge the robust relationship between housing and economic development and are important considerations in developing housing policies for the comprehensive plan. • Make periodic assessments of housing needs. • Enable a supply of housing affordable for all income levels and coordinate with regional organizations on affordable housing initiatives. • Ensure housing options to meet the needs of special populations, such as housing for low-income families, group homes, foster care facilities, or senior housing. • Ensure there is sufficient land and capacity for affordable housing to he located with convenient access to Spokane Valley's employment centers and direct development of higher-density housing to areas of close proximity to amenities, public facilities and transit centers/corridors to help create place and identity,reduce commuting expenses,and encourage physical activity. • Promote homeownership by supporting initiatives to increase ownership opportunities and providing information on programs to residents. • Recognize the important role housing plays in social services and coordinate with human service providers assisting individuals and families. 6-107 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK. 6-108 CI DAP-E 7 Cairm, -I(‘‘A L & int ! i O O 0 PRixo [1c ervres ' • „;,;„;;,;,,;;;,,,,,,,,,;„;,,,,,,,,,,,,,;; ";,,,,,,,;,,,,,,;;,;,,;,,,,; ,,,,,,,,,,;,,;;,,,,;,;;,,,;; ,;;,,;,;,,,, } Introduction 7/ {' . WI IY THE CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT IS 11if 1111 IMPORTANT The Capital Facilities Element helps the city manage its investments related to facilities needed for growth, and responds to specific Growth Management Act requirements. The element relies on a Capital Facilities Plan (CFP), which helps the City use its limited funding wisely and efficiently, and ensures that facilities are in place when growth occurs. The CFP includes a six-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) with estimated costs and proposed methods of financing. The plan also anticipates needed investments to support the City's economic development initiatives. PLANNING CONTEXT The Growth Management Act (GMA), specifically RCW 36.70A.070 (3) (a), identifies public facilities that are required to be inventoried.WAC 365-196-415 provides guidance as to which capital facilities should be included in the inventory. At a minimum, they should include water systems, sanitary sewer systems, storm water facilities, reclaimed water facilities, schools, parks and recreational facilities, police and fire protection facilities, Identified facilities must have a minimum standard Level of Service (LOS), include an inventory and needs assessment and include or reference the location and capacity of needed facilities, Transportation standards are the only facilities required to have a concurrency mechanism, although a local government may choose to adopt a concurrency mechanism for other facilities. REFERENCES KEY The Countywide Planning Policies(CWPP),originally adopted in 1994,contain / f) Refers to other section a number of goals and policies regarding capital facilities and the provision of • 9-114 in plan urban services. This element is consistent with the CWPP and the adopted % Refers to other Spokane regional level of service standards, / s $V Valley plans and official This element acts as a reference to all the various capital facility plans, ///, documents comprehensive plans, capital improvement and investment programs, / inventories, and studies that together represent the planning and financing Refers to other mechanisms required to serve the capital facility needs for the City of Spokane O non Spokane Valley Valley. Y references for further t reading The City's approach to Capital Facilities Planning is unique in that special purpose districts and other private utilities provide many of our services. //f/fJ/,r!///rf////////////f/////. /////// The City, however, provides capital facilities for municipal buildings, streets, 7-110 parks and recreation, and stormwater.This Capital Facilities element therefore provides information about the city's facilities, but also references the functional plans of each external service provider. The element contains an inventory of capital facilities and service providers, and existing and future level of service (LOS) for each type of capital facility. Current Conditions The City of Spokane Valley owns and manages a number of capital facilities including roads, parks, a police facility, a regional event center, a city hall and a street maintenance facility.There are a number of capital facilities that serve the City of Spokane Valley that are managed by other entities(see table below). In these cases, the City coordinates with the responsible governing bodies and organizations to ensure consistency between capital facility plans. This collaborative review covers the construction of new facilities, improvements to existing facilities, the levels of service provided by those facilities, and the sources of revenues and financing of needed facilities. EXISTING FACILITIES The following is a summary inventory of capital facilities providing services within the City of Spokane Valley and references corresponding functional plans and maps. Capital facilities belonging to privately-owned utilities serving the City(electrical, natural gas, liquid or other gas pipelines and telecommuni- cation)are discussed in the Utilities Element of the Plan. FACILITIES INVENTORY DESCRIPTION FUNCTIONAL PLAN AND MAP The City of Spokane Valley does not own or operate a public water supply system. Spokane Valley residences and businesses receive water from special purpose districts,associations,and public and private corporations. The Coordinated Water • Spokane County Coordinated System Plan(CWSP)identifies service boundaries,establishes minimum design Water System Plan Water standards and promotes the consolidation of regional water resource management. • Map 4.2 Water Districts and The Board of County Commissioners or the Washington State Department of Health Wellheads (DOH)provide updates to the CWSP. Spokane Valley supports regional water supply planning,water use efficiency programs and plans,watershed planning,wellhead protection plans,water quality plans,and planning for reclamation and reuse. Spokane County Environmental Services provides sewer service in Spokane Valley. • Spokane County Comprehensive in 2009 an interlocal agreement was adopted which established a wastewater Sewer Wastewater Management Plan management advisory board and gave Spokane County the exclusive authority to • Map 4.5 Sewer Service provide sewer service to the City of Spokane Valley. 7-111 FACILITIES INVENTORY DESCRIPTION FUNCTIONAL PLAN AND MAP Transportation capital facilities include streets,bridges,pathways and sidewalks. Spokane Valley is responsible for about 439 miles of public roads. Overall,there are approximately 125 miles of major roadways(arterials and collectors}and 314 miles of local roadways,encompassing over 81,000,000 square feet of asphalt and concrete • Transportation Improvement Plan surfacing. • Map 3.1 Arterial Street Plan The Six Year Transportation Improvement Program(TIP)lists all the transportation projects the City of Spokane Valley plans to pursue over the next six years. Spokane Valley coordinates with other agencies,including Spokane County and the Washington State Department of Transportation when developing the TIP. Stormwater runoff in Spokane Valley flows to a combination of public and private facilities.In developed areas,runoff infiltrates into the ground or flows to drywells in public road rights-of-way,drywells on private property and grassy swales with overflow drywells in easements on private property. • Spokane Regional Stormwater Stormwater The Spokane Regional Stormwater Manual provides design and maintenance criteria Manual to serve the current and future stormwater needs of the Spokane region.The criteria are intended to enhance and promote future development in a way that reasonably protects the health,safety,and welfare of current and future property owners,while at the same time preserving or enhancing the existing natural drainage systems. The Spokane Valley Police Department provides a safe environment for the citizens,businesses,and visitors of the City of Spokane Valley through a contractual Law Enforcement agreement with the Spokane County Sheriff's Department. • Interlocal agreement or contract for services This unique contracting relationship allows for the sharing of resources,allowing both agencies to operate at peak efficiency without duplicating services, The Spokane County Library District(District)provides library services in Spokane Valley.The District is a municipal corporation established by voters in 1942 under • Spokane County Library Capital Libraries provisions of RCW 27,12.040. This independent special purpose district provides Improvement Plan public library services to the unincorporated county and affiliated municipalities. The Spokane Valley Parks and Recreation Department provides for a wide range of Parks and recreational opportunities available to residents and visitors. • Spokane Valley Parks and RecreationRecreation Master Plan City parks,school play fields,trails,County parks and conservations areas are all within close vicinity to Spokane Valley residents. Private haulers licensed by the Washington Utility and Transportation Commission • Spokane Valley Solid Waste Solid Waste (W.U.T.C.)through franchise agreements provide solid waste services in Spokane Management Plan Valley. 7-112 FACILITIES INVENTORY DESCRIPTION FUNCTIONAL PLAN AND MAP Spokane Valley Fire Department(SVFD)and Spokane County Fire District No,a provide Fire protection,rescue,and emergency medical services(EMS)in the City of Fire and Spokane Valley. • Spokane Valley Fire Department Emergency Strategic Plan ServicesSVFD serves over 90%of the City,while District 8 serves a few small areas in • Map 4.2 Fire Districts the southern part of the City.Both districts serve the City with a full range of fire suppression and EMS services. Four public school districts provide service within Spokane Valley:East Valley, • CVSD Strategic Plan West Valley,Central Valley and Spokane School District 81.Spokane Valley must • coordinate with each district to ensure consistency between the City's plan and EVSD Strategic Plan Public Schools school districts'plans. • WVSD Strategic Plan • Spokane Public Schools Strategic Specific information on school district facilities including.but not limited to, Plan enrollment.classroom size,service standards,and financing.is contained in each • Map 4.4 School Districts school district's strategic plan. The City of Spokane Valley maintains other capital facilities including a satellite police City-Owned • City of Spokane Valley Capital precinct,a regional event center,a city hall and a street maintenance facility(see Facilities Plan Facilities descriptions below). CITY-OWNED FACILI1 INS This section of the CFP includes civic buildings such as government offices, community centers, and entertainment facilities. As a relatively new city, incorporated in 2003, Spokane Valley does not have a significant inventory of community facilities. CenterPlace Regional Event Center CenterPlace is located at 2426 North Discovery Place, near Mirabeau Park, It is a 54,000 square foot regional event center and houses the Senior Center, as well as the Parks and Recreation Office. There are no recommendations for improvements to this facility at this time. Street Maintenance Facility The City of Spokane Valley Street and Stormwater maintenance facility is located at 17002 East Euclid Avenue. The facility houses plow trucks, storrnwater and traffic signal parts, liquid and granular deicing material and other street maintenance equipment. Police Precinct The Police Precinct is located at 12710 East Sprague Avenue. The building is approximately 21,779 square feet in size. The District Court operates a courtroom out of the building, using 2,503 square feet. The County pays a lease and maintenance charges for this facility. The building also contains office space, a kitchen, a locker room and bathroom, a maintenance garage, 7-113 a gym, a court ticket counter, a police counter, a conference room, and roll call room. There is also a shop and garage in a separate structure. Dedicated Spokane Valley personnel and some support staff are housed at the Precinct Building. Most of the investigative personnel and support staff are housed at the Public Safety Building in Spokane. The old jail holding area is now used for breathalyzer tests, probation meetings, recorded interviews, and additional office space. Ongoing Projects The City Hall site is 3.38 acres located at the southeast corner of Sprague Avenue and Dartmouth Street. The total square footage of the structure is 65,172. The building will he three stories above grade totaling 47,485 square feet. The first floor will be 18,553 square feet, the second floor will be 15,155 square feet and the third floor is 13,777 square feet. The building will have a full basement of 17,687 square feet. The construction of City Hall will be complete by August 31, 2017. The City will move in to the new building in September 2017.The total project cost for City Hall is approximately $14,150,000. The City is using $6,300,000 from the general fund and $7,850,000 in net Limited Tax General Obligation(LTGO) bond proceeds. The bonds will be repaid over a 30-year period in roughly equal annual installments. The average annual bond repayment is $399,888, which is $34,712 less per year than the City's current annual lease payment for the current City Hall space at the Redwood Plaza located at 17707 East Sprague Avenue. MEETING AND EXCEEDING STANDARDS Level of Service(LOS) is the adopted standard used to measure the adequacy of services. LOS relates to the types of services rendered. For capital facilities, LOS standards determine what improvements or new facilities are necessary to support anticipated growth. These standards inform the public, developers, and decision-makers about the quality or quantity of a facility or service. An LOS standard is a tool to measure the performance of a capital facility. A capital facility operating at or above the established LOS indicates no need for improvements or new facilities.A facility operating below the established LOS is an indication that there may be a need for improvements,or new facilities,or evaluation of the LOS. The following table below provides the regional LOS for water, sewer, transportation, stormwater, law enforcement, libraries, parks, street cleaning, public transit,fire and schools. Local jurisdictions may choose higher standards. 7-114 FACILITIES REGIONAL LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD Domestic Water Supply-Minimum Levels of Service for storage capacity and flow shall be consistent with the Washington State Department of Health requirements and the Spokane County Coordinated Water System Plan requirements(where applicable). System Design-Minimum Levels of Service for pipe sizing,flow rate,and systematic grid development shall be Water consistent with the Washington State Department of Health requirements and the Coordinated Water System Plan requirements(where applicable). Fire Flow-Fire flow rate and duration as well as fire hydrant specifications and spacing shall be consistent with local fire authority requirements or the Fire Code,whichever is more stringent. Incorporated areas will be provided with tivastewater collection and transport systems in accordance with the adopted sewer concurrency requirements of the jurisdiction.Unincorporated urban growth areas will he provided with wastewater collection and transport systems in accordance with the requirements for sewer concurrency as set forth in Spokane County's Development Regulations. Collection systems and transport systems will be designed for peak flow conditions so that overflows,backups, and discharges from the system do not occur under normal operating situations,Specific design criteria shall conform to the requirements of the Washington State Department of Ecology and local regulations.Wastewater collection and transport systems will convey wastewater to centralized wastewater treatment facilities.Centralized Sewer wastewater treatment and effluent disposal facilities will he planned,designed,and constructed to provide effluent that does not adversely impact the quality of surface or ground water of the State of Washington. Planning and design for wastewater treatment and effluent disposal facilities will he based on 20 year projections of population growth and current water quality criteria as established by the Washington State Department of Ecology. (Centralized wastewater treatment facilities shall be a part of a sewage system owned or operated by a city,town,municipal corporation,county,political subdivision of the state or other approved ownership consisting of a collection system and necessary trunks,pumping facilities and means of final treatment and disposal and approved or under permit from the Washington State Department of Ecology.) Transportation Maintain travel corridor time as established by Spokane Regional Transportation Council. Flooding of property outside designated drainage ways,de facto drainage-ways,easements,flood zones or other approved drainage facilities during the design precipitation or runoff event prescribed in the standards of the governing local agency or jurisdiction shall be prevented within the reasonable probability afforded by such standards.Impact to buildings and accessory structures shall be avoided to the maximum extent practicable by Stormwater evaluating the effects of a 100-year rain event,and implementing measures to ensure that the runoff attendant to such an event is directed away from such buildings and accessory structures.Any stormwater discharge to surface or ground waters must meet federal,state,and local requirements for water quality treatment,storrnwater runoff and infiltration. Each jurisdiction shall specify in its Comprehensive Plan a level of police protection that addresses the safety of its Law Enforcement citizens. Libraries Each jurisdiction will specify its own level of service. 7-115 FACILITIES REGIONAL LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD Parks Each jurisdiction will specify its own level of service. Solid waste processing will meet Federal and State regulations,including maintaining any required facilities Solid Waste licenses, Each jurisdiction within the non-attainment area shall develop and use a street cleaning plan,coordinating with Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority(SCAPCA)as the oversight agency,to meet mandated Particulate Matter dust standards,Each jurisdiction's street cleaning plan will describe the programs and methods to be used to reduce particulate matter emissions from paved surfaces. Each plan shall address but not be limited to the following: Street Cleaning 1)Street sweeping frequency and technology to be employed, 2)Factors for determining when and where to initiate street sweeping following a sanding event,with the goals of expeditious removal when safety and mobility requirements have been satisfied. 3)Sanding reduction goal. 4)Sanding materials specifications to be employed. 5)Locations,application rates and circumstances for use of chemical de-icers and other sanding alternatives. 6)Identification of priority roadways(over 15,000 average daily traffic count). Jurisdictions within the Public Transit Benefit Area IPTBA)shall have policies consistent with the level of service Public Transit adopted by the Spokane Transit Authority Board of Directors. Urban areas jurisdictions in excess of 5,000 population,or once a population of 5.000 persons is achieved,shall be served by a Fire District with at least a(Washington Survey and Rating Bureau of Insurance Services Office)Class 6 Insurance Rating or better.For the purposes of GMA minimum Levels of Service,Class 6 or better shall be based on the ISO Grading Schedule for municipal fire protection,1974 edition,as amended,by using the fire district, fire service communication,and fire safety control portions of the grading schedule.The total deficiency points identified in these portions of the ISO or Washington Survey and Rating Bureau schedule shall not exceed 1,830 points. Fire and Emergency All jurisdictions,regardless of size,shall ensure that new development has a Fire Flow and hydrant placement per Services the International Fire Code adopted by that jurisdiction.Urban areas must be within 5 road miles of an operating fire station that provides service with a"Class A"pumper,unless structures are equipped with fire sprinkler(s)that are rated in accordance with the edition of the International Fire Code adopted by the jurisdiction,and is located within 5 road miles of an operating fire station that provides service with a Class"A"rated pumper.Urban areas shall be served by a state certified basic life support(BLS)agency.Urban areas should be served by an operating basic lifesaving unit within 5 miles;and an operating advanced life support unit within 6 miles or 10 minutes' response time for those jurisdictions with urban areas in excess of 5,000 in population:and basic life support and advanced life support transport service. Public Schools To be determined by individual school district CFP. 7-116 The City of Spokane Valley has adopted the following LOS standards, which in some cases exceed the regional LOS standards described in the preceding table. FACILITIES SPOKANE VALLEY LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD Water Meet the minimum Regional LOS Sewer Public Sewer required for new development LOS D for signalized intersection Transportation LOS E for Un-signalized intersection Stormwater Meet the minimum Regional LOS Law Enforcement No minimum LOS adopted Libraries Library District to set LOS Parks 1.92 acres per 1,000 residents Solid Waste Meet the minimum regional LOS Street Cleaning Meet the minimum regional LOS Public Transit Meet the minimum regional LOS Fire and Emergency Services Meet the minimum regional LOS Public Schools School Districts to set LOS Notably, the City does not apply LOS standards to the city-owned facilities described in an earlier section of this Element. Instead, the finance department is developing an asset management system that will allow the City to produce recommendations for the maintenance of city-owned facilities. FUNDING FUTURE PROJECTS The Growth Management Act (GMA) requires that budgeting decisions be consistent with the comprehensive plan. The 6-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is a significant component of the Financing Plan. It includes a list of projects, when they will begin, how much they will cost, and how they will be funded. Both the Transportation Improvement Plan, Parks and Recreation Master Plan are adopted by reference and each identify capital improvements and the financing for those improvements. The building of new City Hall is the only other capital improvement proposed within the next 6-years and the financing for that project is identified under ongoing projects. For all other facility types, the City will continue to coordinate with relevant service providers identified above. These providers are responsible for maintaining adopted levels of service and the financing of improvements. The improvements and financing for those providers are not repeated here. 7-117 CURRENT FUNDING SOURCES The City is limited in its ability to finance all desired capital facility projects. Options must be available for addressing funding shortfalls or adjustments to lower the levels of service for public facilities. In deciding how to address a particular shortfall, the City will need to balance current needs versus future growth requirements and existing deficiencies versus future expansions. If funding shortfalls occur, the City will have the following options available to balance the budget: • Increase revenues, • decrease level of service standards, • decrease the cost of the service or facility, • decrease the demand for the service or facility, • or some combination of the above. Frequently used sources of funds for the maintenance or expansion of capital facilities in Spokane Valley include current revenues, bonds, federal grants, state grants and loans and others. Those sources are included, with added detail, in the following table. 7-118 FUNDING CATEGORY FUNDING SOURCE • General Fund(sates tax,fees,property tax,State shared revenues,etc) • Utility Tax for Street Maintenance Current Revenues • Real Estate Excise Tax(REST) • Impact Fees • Non-voted General Obligation • Voted General Obligation Bonds • Revenue(payable from a particular utility or enterprise) • Local Improvement District(Assessment Bonds) • Surface Transportation Program • Bridge Replacement Funds Federal Grants • Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program(CMAQ) • land and Water Conservation Fund • Community Development Block Grants • Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account(ALEA) • Transportation Improvement Account a Centennial Clean Water Fund • Public Works Trust Funds • Resource and Conservation Office(RCO) State Grants/Loans • Arterial Street Fund(Motor Fuel Tax) • Urban Arterial Trust Account(UATA) • Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account • Hazardous Bridge Replacement • Community and Economic Revitalization Board • Water Pollution Control Fund • Developer Contributions Other • Donations • Local Improvement Districts IDENTIFIED NEEDS While the City can finance its six-year capital improvement program, revenue projections beyond six years show a funding gap, The forecast revenues are less than necessary to support the City's desired future capital projects. The City relies heavily on sales tax revenue to fund capital facilities, though this is somewhat problematic considering the fact that sales tax revenues can fluctuate with changes in the local, regional and national economy.This makes 7-119 it imperative that the City consider new funding and financing sources that can be dedicated to capita! facilities to ensure they can meet their future capita! improvement priorities as required under GMA. Challenges and Opportunities Ensuring Street Mointencmce The City of Spokane Valley has the challenge of maintaining the quality of the existing street system.The City of Spokane Valley has approximately 439 miles of paved roadways within its entire network, Overall, there are approximately 125 miles of major roadways (arterials and collectors) and 314 miles of local roadways,encompassing over 81,000,000 square feet of asphalt and concrete surfacing. At an average replacement cost for a typical roadway approaching $859,000 per mile, not including the value of the land, the City has over$375 million invested in its paved roadway network. Preservation of the existing street systems has become a major concern for the City due to the shortage of funds. In an effort to identify solutions for maintaining the City's street infrastructure, the City hired a consultant to analyze the condition of the streets and provide solutions for pavement management. Pavement management is the process of planning, budgeting, funding, designing, constructing, monitoring, evaluating, maintaining, and rehabilitating the pavement network to provide maximum benefits with available funds. The consultant provided the following comments to the City of Spokane Valley as an output from the pavement analysis. The City should adopt a policy statement identifying the desire level of service and acceptable amount of backlog, including deciding on an acceptable Overall Condition Index (OCI) level for City streets. Establishing the target OCI will allow the City to decide on the appropriate annual budget for street maintenance expenditures. The financial impact of allowing the network OCI to drop by allocating fewer resources toward preservation efforts will increase costs in future years when streets need to be fully restored.Deferred maintenance can save some money in years of significant financial constraint; however, that deferred maintenance usually comes at a higher cost later on. Deferring needed maintenance can also reduce the lifespan of the investment. Essentially, every year the City underfunds street maintenance it ultimately costs more to rehabilitate in future years. 7-120 Coordinating Water Districts The City of Spokane Valley does not own or operate a public water supply system, Spokane alley residences and businesses receive water through special purpose districts, associations, and public and private corporations. The Coordinated Water System Plan (CWSP), identifies service boundaries, establishes minimum design standards and promotes the consolidation of regional water resource management. All future development must demonstrate that there is adequate water and fire flow for the proposed use, The City relies on groundwater from the Spokane Valley-Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer for its water needs. Groundwater rights determine the pumping capacity. Currently, some water purveyors serving the City are close to or exceeding their allocated water rights. The City is collaborating with water districts to derive solutions such as adjudication, the formation of a water authority, the conversion of irrigation water rights to municipal water rights, or the inclusion of irrigation water rights when evaluating water supply capacity. The City will need to continue to coordinate with the water purveyors arid DOH to ensure there is an adequate supply of water for current and anticipated demand. On the capacity side, the City will continue to coordinate on the development of strategies to ensure there is adequate water capacity to serve anticipated levels of development. Managing Coal and Oil Transportation Most of the coal delivered to U.S. consumers and For foreign export is transported by railroads. Citizens and local governments in Washington State are concerned about the impacts of increased rail traffic going through their communities and the impacts of proposed coal arid oil export facilities. In Washington State, new oil terminal facilities are proposed in Vancouver and Grays Harbor, and the state's five existing refineries from Tacoma to Ferndale are planning to expand. The five coal export terminals proposed for Washington and Oregon could add dozens of trains per day to Northwest railways. The new terminals and increased transport can obstruct and delay vehicles at rail crossings, extend the travel tines of emergency responders, and block access to hospitals, schools, businesses, and neighborhoods. Heavy coal trains damage rails with their pressure and clog the pores of gravel under tracks, reducing wet ballast permeability and stability increasing the risk of derailment of other hazardous and explosive freight. 7-121 Currently, approximately 150 to 175 trains move through the Northwest daily. If all of the proposed coal export terminals are built, as many as 47 coal trains could he added to the daily total over the next two decades. Half of the trains would he full of coal heading to the ports,The other half would be empty going back to Wyoming and Montana to pick up more coal from the Powder River Basin. This increase in rail traffic further necessitates Bridging the Valley (BTV), The Bridging the Valley project will separate vehicle traffic from train traffic in the 42-mile corridor between Spokane, Washington and Athol, Idaho. The separation of railroad and roadway grades would improve safety, reduce congestion, assist in eliminating whistle noise, improve air quality, and enhance economic development. The City should continue to pursue strategic investments today to avoid costlier investments in the future. Siting Essential Public Facilities The Growth Management Act (GMA) requires the Comprehensive Plan to include a process for identifying and siting Essential Public Facilities (EPF), According to the GMA, no local comprehensive plan may preclude the siting of essential public facilities. The GMA defines essential public facilities as those that are typically difficult to site, such as airports, state education facilities and state or regional transportation facilities as defined in RCW 47.06.140, state and local correctional facilities, solid waste handling facilities, and in-patient facilities including substance abuse facilities, mental health facilities, group homes, and secure community transition facilities as defined in RCW 71.09.020.' The regional process provides for a review process with a location analysis. Public involvement takes place throughout the process with public comment periods as well as public hearings. The review process requires the applicant for an EPF to assume responsibility for the bulk of the analysis and processing of the proposal.The analysis includes two parts. First, an analysis of functional criteria of all potential sites is conducted to select the highest-ranking ten (10) semi-finalist sites.Second,these ten semi-finalist sites are analyzed using more qualitative criteria and resulting in selection of at least three(3)preferred sites. Both analyses include public comment periods. Next, the Board of County Commissioners (BoCC) conducts a public hearing on the preferred site List to allow for further public comment, identify strategies to address any issues associated with particular sites, and rank the 7-122 finalist sites,The BoCC ranking is advisory to but not binding on the applicant. Last, the applicant, after selecting a specific site, will work directly with a local jurisdiction and its regulatory requirements to permit construction and operation of the EPF. The regional siting process is based on a coordinated inter-jurisdictional approach, which in combination with consistent development regulations among the jurisdictions will implement the requirement of equitable distribution of EPF of a statewide or regional/countywide nature. Funding New Facilities and Services New growth creates a demand for new and expanded public facilities and services, and the City must find ways to pay for these facilities and services. Impact fees may represent one opportunity to raise the necessary funds, The GMA authorizes local governments to impose and collect impact fees to partially fund public facilities to accommodate new growth, and these fees can be used to pay for new or expanded facilities (but cannot be collected to address existing infrastructure deficiencies),The GMA allows impact fees to be assessed on the following: • Public Streets and Roads • Public Parks • Schools • Open Space • Fire Protection Facilities • Recreation Facilities Impact fees provide an opportunity for the City to fund future facilities by distributing the costs of new development proportionally as development occurs. Many builders and developers are impact fee proponents because they know that impact fees add predictability to the development approval process and create a "level playing field" between them and their competitors. They also know impact fees replace less fair negotiated exactions, According to recent national surveys,about 60%of all cities with over 25,000 residents and almost 40%of all metropolitan counties use some form of impact fees. The City should consider enacting impact fees to add predictability and a more balanced funding mechanism for capital facilities, • 7-123 Sustaining Investment In Trails The City Fias invested in the development of the Appleway Trail. The first phase constructed a shared use path along the abandoned Milwaukee railroad corridor. The corridor parallels Sprague Avenue, approximately 2 blocks to the south, through the heart of Spokane Valley's commercial district, In 2008, the City constructed 1.2 miles of this path from Corbin Road to the east city limits. The City is scheduled to construct Pines to Evergreen and Sullivan to Corbin in 2017, The project will provide a route for non-motorized travel along Spokane Valley's principle east-west commercial arterial, connecting Pence-Cole Valley Transit Center, business districts, schools, and multifamily housing. The pathway will connect to Sprague Avenue by way of signage, side street routes, and connections directly to businesses. The path will include arterial crossings with pedestrian HAWK beacons, medians and pedestrian rapid flashing beacons at the higher traffic volume locations. Connecting the Appleway Trail to Sprague Avenue and the commercial assets along the corridor is a great opportunity and can generate a range of expected benefits for the local community. The City should continue to make connections to the businesses along the Sprague corridor to the Appleway Trail. The City will benefit from increase sales taxes and nearby retail businesses will benefit from increased spending. COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES Providing Infrastructure For Industrial Development The role of government and the relationship with business has changed considerably since the recession. Policymakers have begun to focus many of their efforts on understanding and supporting business development. The City recognizes that industrial development is necessary to increase economic prosperity in our community. Industrial Improvement Area The City has identified an area located in the southeast portion of the City that is appropriate for quality industrial development. The City is coordinating infrastructure improvements,and continued planning for relevant facilities and services is essential to achieving the city's vision. 7-124 To date, the City has coordinated with economic development partners at the state and local levels to facilitate a new Union Pacific spur just east of Barker Road and north of Euclid Avenue. The spur will allow for rail access to approximately 500 acres of industrial land. The City is also working with Spokane County to facilitate the expansion of sewer service to the same area. Ultimately, the City would like to work with the property owners to create certified sites for new industrial development. Barker Road Grade Separation The existing intersection at Barker Road and Trent Avenue has a LOS of "F" due to high traffic volumes and proximity to the at-grade crossing. This failing level of service rating restricts development of 500 acres of nearby industri- al-zoned land and 75 acres of residential-zoned land. Without improvement, the crossing will experience continued increases in vehicle and rail conflicts, eroding the quality of life in nearby residential areas and impeding economic growth. This project proposes an overpass over BNSF's tracks an Trent Avenue, as well as other roadway access improvements. The Barker Road crossing is one of 57 high priority crossings targeted for improvement as part of "Bridging the Valley,"an important initiative for eastern Washington and north Idaho. BNSF's tracks currently carry approximately 55 scheduled trains a day,a figure that will increase substantially to serve a projected expansion in agricultural production, natural resources and other sectors.The estimated project costs are 36 million dollars.The city is not currently able to pay these costs. The investment in infrastructure will allow the land to support economic development at a much higher intensity. The economic and tax impacts of that higher level of development are estimated as follows stemming from the construction and occupation of industrial developments. • $2 billion in total economic output in the state ($980 million in direct impacts) • 9,800 new jobs supported in the state(3,300 direct job impacts) • $12.3 million in new general fund taxes to the city(25-year present value at 4%) • $50.8 million in new general fund taxes to Washington State (25-year present value at 4%) 7-125 Pines Road Improvements This $18 million project proposes to reconstruct Pines Road to pass under existing E3NSF tracks.To accommodate this,Trent Avenue will also be lowered. This project will allow the City of Spokane Valley to request closure of the University Road railroad crossing one mile to the west, The closure would further improve public safety by reducing the possibility of rail-vehicle collisions at this intersection. BNSF's tracks currently carry approximately 55 scheduled trains a day, a figure that will increase substantially to serve a projected expansion in agricultural production, natural resources and other sectors. In 2016, the project cost is estimated to cost 18 million dollars. Supporting Retail Districts The City's capital investments often set the stage for and entice private investment. There is a significant amount of retail space in Spokane Valley,with retail uses clustered along Sprague and Appleway,as well as many of the City's north-south corridors like Argonne and Sullivan and the area near the Spokane Valley Mail.The City recognizes supporting current retails and future, catalytic development projects requires continued investment in local infrastructure. The City should prioritize capital projects with input from retailers, investing in the appearance of key gateways and planning for multimodal access to retail centers. Furthermore, the City should consider infrastructure improvements in areas with higher housing densities, especially those lacking public infrastructure that would support neighborhood-scale retail development. Ongoing city-funded projects, such as the City Hall,also offer opportunities to create the conditions for new retail development. 7-126 BEST PRACTICES AND REQUIRED MEASURES Capital facility plans are blueprints for the future, they identify economic, land use, and infrastructure development and/or redevelopment, which may include transportation, housing, and public facilities. These plans include broad community participation to ensure the City is planning and identifying the jurisdictional needs for the future. Regular updates are imperative to determine development and infrastructure needs as local conditions change. Establish Criteria For Project Prioritization The City should further develop a process of prioritizing projects based on capital improvements to support economic prosperity in our community. This could include identifying projects that can be grouped together to gain economies of scale (e.g. replacing water lines before or when street improvements are made). Emphasize Preventative Maintenance Another important area that the City should pay particular attention to is preventive maintenance. A component of effective maintenance typically includes preventative maintenance requiring regularly scheduled intervals to prevent premature failure to maximize the useful life of our facilities. The City should have an established baseline for a comprehensive preventive maintenance program. Account For Lifecycle Costs The City should budget resources based on highest need and costs for deferring the maintenance (e.g. streets). Establishing a Facilities Condition Index (FCI) to provide information for planned maintenance with set priorities and cost estimates.The index would assist the City in determining the life cycle costs to help determine whether it is more cost effective to replace or repair components or replace the entire facility. 7-127 7-128 CHAPTER 8 co, t i n + a , , • . UtilNities fes. Introduction WHY THE UTILITIES ELEMENT IS IMPORTANT •V�Y 4 Spokane Valley residents rely on facilities and services that help define their quality of life. These facilities include those provided by several privately owned utilities in the region. Although these utilities are privately owned and regulated at either the state and/or federal level, coordinated planning at the local level is essential to ensure that adequate utility service is available to all citizens. Sanitary sewer and potable water are typically considered "utilities"; however, for purposes of the City's comprehensive plan, sewer and water are addressed in the Capital Facilities Element of this Plan.This element addresses electrical service, natural gas and telecommunications utilities. The Utilities element is an opportunity to identify ways of improving the quality of services provided within the City. The City will use this element to identify priorities and develop implementation strategies to ensure that provision of utilities is properly coordinated with land use. PLANNING CONTEXT The GMA requires cities to prepare a Utilities element that generally describes the location of existing and proposed utilities, and the related capacity. This element must be internally consistent with all other appropriate elements of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan. At a regional level the Countywide Planning Policies(CWPPs)provide a regional policy framework to achieve the overall goals of GMA. The CWPPs were REFERENCES KEY coordinated by the Spokane County Steering Committee of Elected Officials (SCEO) and adopted by the Spokane County Board of County Commissioners. Refers to other section // oA Regional Utility Corridor Plan was prepared by the Spokane County Regional 9-114 in plan Utility Technical Committee and adopted in 1995 by the SCEO to insure the Refers to other Spokane CWPP's were met. SV Valley plans and official Many utilities that operate within the region are planned and regulated at documents higher levels. Privately and publicly owned electrical, natural gas, and land line Refers to other telephone utilities are regulated by the Washington Utilities and Transportation Onon-Spokane Valley Commission (WUTC). Wireless telephone communication companies are references for further licensed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Cable television reading companies are regulated by the FCC and the Communications Acts of 1934 and 1996. Utilities must have a franchise agreement to place utilities in the public right of way. Franchise agreements give each utility the non-exclusive //////////////////////////// right to provide its category of service within the City. 8-130 Current Conditions This section provides information related to the current providers of electrical service utilities and telecommunications utilities in Spokane Valley. ELECTRICAL SERVICE UTILITIES There are currently five providers of electrical services serving Spokane Valley. These include the Bonneville Power Administration,Avista Utilities,Vera Water & Power, Modern Electric Water Company and Inland Power and Light. This section introduces each company and provides an overview of services. Bonneville Power Arltlrinistrcrl.iotr The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) is a federal agency under the U.S. Department of Energy that markets wholesale electrical power and operates and markets electrical transmission services in the Pacific Northwest. Although BPA is part of the U.S. Department of Energy, it is self-funding and covers its costs by selling its products and services. BPA markets wholesale electrical power from 31 federal hydroelectric projects in the Columbia River Basin,one nonfederal nuclear plant and several other nonfederal power plants, The dams are operated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Reclamation. BPA manages over 15 thousand circuit miles of transmission lines and owns 261 substations. The hydroelectric projects and the electrical system are known as the Federal Columbia River Power System. About 28 % of the electric power used in the Northwest comes from BPA. BPA's transmission system accounts for approximately three-fourths of the high-voltage grid in its service territory and includes major transmission links with other regions. BPA's service territory covers 300,000 square miles and includes Idaho,Oregon,Washington,western Montana and small parts of eastern Montana, California, Nevada, Utah and Wyoming. BPA operates a 500 kV line just north of the existing city limits. Additionally, BPA operates the Trentwood substation and 115kV transmission lines within the City of Spokane Valley. Avisto Utilities Avista Utilities is involved in the production, transmission and distribution of energy. Avista provides energy services and electricity to 369,000 customers in a service territory that covers 30,000 square miles in eastern Washington, northern Idaho and parts of southern and eastern Oregon, with a population of 1.6 million. Avista Utilities is an operating division of Avista Corp.and is the principal electiricity provider in the City of Spokane Valley. 8-131 Avista has a number of substation facilities and 115 kV transmission lines in the City of Spokane Valley. Map XXX indicates those facility locations for that portion of Avista's transmission system that covers Spokane Valley. To determine how to best meet the future electric needs of its customers, Avista produces an Electric Integrated Resource Plan. The plan looks ahead 20 years to identify resource strategies and portfolios that will cost effectively meet customers' long-term needs, The plan is refreshed every two years, on even years, as required for both the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission and the Idaho Public Utilities Commission.The IRP and additional information on the process are available on Avista's website at www.avistautilities.com/irp, Avista Corp 2015 Electric Integrated Resource Plan indicates that the company has adequate resources, combined with conservation and market purchases, to meet peak load requirements through 2020. In 2021 resources acquired to meet projected winter deficiencies will provide capacity in excess of summer needs. Avista's first energy deficit is anticipated in 2026. The electric grid is nearly the same as when it was built over a century ago. In order to maintain reliability and meet growing demand Avista must invest in updating poles, wires and technology in the system. it's critical to update the aging grid to be smarter and to support technologies of today and tomorrow, A smart grid is a more efficient and effective electricity infrastructure that can help contain costs, reduce emissions, incorporate renewable energy, increase power grid reliability and provider greater flexibility for consumers. It will modernize the traditional, one-way power delivery system to an automated, two-way exchange of information and multi-directional power flow. Avista has several projects, funded with federal stimulus moneys from the Department of Energy and matching funds from Avista and cost-share partners, that will prepare our region for a transition of the electrical grid to a "smart grid"by: • Upgrading electrical facilities and automating the electrical distribution system to support digital, intelligent devices and two-way communication between the utility and all parts of the grid • Developing our workforce with training programs for building and implementing smart grid technologies • Building local and regional partnerships as we build our energy future 8-132 Vern Water& Power Vera Water and Power is a publicly owned utility that supplies water and electricity to the Veradale area. Vera currently operates three substations in Spokane Valley. A new substation located on the corner of Sullivan Road and 16th Avenue is under construction with a target energize date of 2016. Approximately 3,000 customers will be moved to the new substation to ensure the district's electric system is safe and reliable. Vera purchases a majority of its power from the Bonneville Power Administration (DPA) which is then distributed to its customers through an underground and overhead electrical distribution system. Vera takes delivery of power from BPA at the substations indicated above.Vera serves over 10,500 electric customers in the City of Spokane Valley. In June 2016 Vera introduced a Community Solar Project to customers choosing to purchase "blocks of power"and share in the cost of building a solar electric project. Community solar participants are eligible to receive Washington State production credits through June 2020. After 2020 the renewal of the state incentives is up to the legislature.Additional information on services and processes can be found on Vera's website at www.verawaterandpower.com, Modern Electric. Water Company Modern Electric Water Company (MEWCO) is a nonprofit, customer-owned corporation that provides water and electricity to approximately 10,000 customers in the Opportunity neighborhood of Spokane Valley. MEWCO purchases power from BPA and currently is in an agreement to purchase all its electrical power from BPA through September 30, 2029. MEWCO's mission is to provide reliable,economical and safe electric and water distribution services. Their goal is to make the City of Spokane Valley more attractive to businesses looking to locate and expand here by offering the lowest rates in the area. MEWCO's electrical supply system consists of three substations including the Locust station, located south of Interstate 90 on the west side of Locust Street; Nelson station, located south of 4th Avenue east of Walnut; and the Opportunity station located at Modern's main office site on Pines Road, north of Broadway. Additional information on services and processes can he found on MEWCO's website at www.mewco.com. Inlanc! Power& Liffht Inland Power & Light (Inland) serves electrical customers in 13 counties in eastern Washington and northern Idaho and is the largest electric cooperative 8-133 in the state. Inland currently purchases all its power from BPA. Inland's customer base has grown to over 39,000 customers with a relatively small number located in the southern portion of the City of Spokane Valley. Inland is a member owned company focused on providing safe, reliable electricity at affordable rates. Additional information on services and processes and the most recent IRP can be found on Inland's website at lifts:// www.inlandpower.com. NATURAL GAS SERVICE /histo Utilities Avista Utilities also operates and maintains the natural gas distribution system serving Spokane Valley,and is the only provider of natural gas in the city.Avista provides natural gas to 329,000 customers in a service territory that covers 30,000 square miles in eastern Washington, northern Idaho and parts of southern and eastern Oregon,with a population of 1.6 million. Avista Utilities is an operating division of Avista Corp. (NYSE: AVA), For more information, please visit www.avistautilities.com. The Pacific Northwest receives natural gas from various regions of the United States and Canada. Natural gas is transported throughout the states of Washington, Oregon and Idaho via a network of interstate transmission pipelines owned and operated by Northwest Pipeline Corporation, Natural gas delivery from Northwest's Williams Pipeline is via Avista's distribution system. To determine how to best meet the future natural gas energy needs of its customers, Avista produces a Natural Gas Integrated Resource Plan. The plan looks ahead 20 years to identify resource strategies and portfolios that will cost effectively meet customers' long-term needs.The plan is refreshed every two years as required for both the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission and the Idaho Public Utilities Commission.The IRP and additional information on the process is available on Avista's website at www,avistautili- ties.com/irp. Avista Corp 2014 Natural Gas IRP forecasts an annual growth rate of 0.7 % and a 0.6 % compounded growth rate in peak day requirements from 2014 to 2033. In the Average Case demand scenario, using Avista's existing supply resources, analysis showed no resource deficiencies in the 20-year planning horizon. Anticipated low customer growth has eliminated the need for Avista to acquire additional supply-side resources. 8-134 Telecommunications tit-UN-les Telecommunications is the transmission of information in the form of electronic signals or other similar means. The telecommunications section focuses on telephone,wireless communications, Internet and cable television. Landline Telephone System Telephone service is offered through two main providers, although service is available through various cable companies. CenturyLink Communication, Inc. provides telecommunication service to the Spokane Valley planning area as regulated by WUTC. Century Link's facilities may be aerial or buried, copper or fiber. Comcast also offers wired phone service to the Spokane Valley area. Comcast utilizes existing telecommunications infrastructure for this service. Comcast is regulated by the WUTC. It is anticipated that additional upgraded facilities will be needed to handle the growing demand. However,due to advances in technology,additional capacity is easily and quickly added to the system. Wireless telephone System The City is served with a number of wireless communication service providers. Currently, these services rely on ground-based antennae and often co-located. Expansion of the wireless system is demand driven; therefore, wireless providers maintain a short response time and a tight planning horizon. Providing wireless service involves adapting to changing technologies, which may make current forms of receivers obsolete. Cable Television and Internet Service Internet service is available through multiple providers. CentruryLink and Comcast are the primary cable television and Internet providers. CenturyLink provides Internet service via telephone lines and Comcast provides Internet service via cable, However, numerous cable providers serve the area, and generally, include Internet access service options. The city supports increasing the availability of improved telecommunica- tions services throughout the city. The city encourages new telecommunica- tions technology that balances the costs and benefits of health and safety, aesthetics, the environment and the economy. In most cases, telecommuni- cations services will use existing utility corridors and public rights-of-way, and will be able to provide services to all parts of the city.The City encourages the shared use of space for telecommunication infrastructure projects within the 8-135 street right-of-way and for telecommunication infrastructure opportunities. The City's infrastructure investment and aesthetic quality should be protected from unnecessary degradation caused by the construction of telecommunica- tions infrastructure. Challenges and Opportunities Developing aril Supporting New Tchriologies New technology offers new opportunities to bring high speed Internet access to the city. Ensuring that quality, affordable Internet connectivity is available will further the city's goal of economic growth. The community will need to work to ensure that there are not excessive visual impacts and that access is not limited to select areas of the city. A balanced permitting process will help encourage deployment of high speed telecommunications infrastructure while protecting neighborhood character. Maintaining Utility infrastructure Some of Spokane Valley's utilities infrastructure is aging and will require repairs and replacement over the next twenty years. The costs of replacing utility infrastructure may be substantial for each utility and may take years for planning and implementation. Each utility has strategies and plans for funding and building the necessary improvements Accommodating Future Demand Increased demand will require investment to build new facilities. As demand increases, which may be a likely outcome of continued population and employment growth, non-city utility providers will need to plan for new or improved facilities and residents may turn to providers for expertise in energy efficiency. Protecting Neighborhood Character It is important to ensure that new and expanding utility facilities are sensitive to neighborhood character. Some utilities have the potential to create significant incompatibilities with Spokane Valley neighborhoods. Such sensitivity factors as proximity to residential neighborhoods, visual access, and expansion within or beyond an existing facility border should be considered in identifying potential incompatibilities. 8-136 COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES Utilities are involved in several community and economic development priorities. Accommodating New Development Ongoing economic development efforts will lead to new private development projects in Spokane Valley. For these projects to be viable, utilities must ensure sufficient capacity and reliable deliver for future tenants, Spokane Valley's focus on catalytic projects also involve development at scales that may require explicit utilities planning. Investing In Key Corridors Economic development relies on selling Spokane Valley to potential business owners, employees and residents. The aesthetic appearance of gateways and corridors is one component of these marketing efforts. Substations, overhead wires and other quotidian components of utilities infrastructure can affect the experiential quality of Spokane Valley's neighborhoods and commercial areas. Therefore,to the extent possible,the city should support efforts by private utilities to locate infrastructure in practical but unobtrusive areas. This may involve the continuation of current efforts to limit the placement of telecommunications facilities with rights-of-way. BEST PRACTICES AND REQUIRED MEASURES What do you typically see as best practices by private utilities? Should language regarding undergrounding be placed here? Or Is this where franchise agreements are discussed? Can we discuss? Uncler3roundirrg Utilities Undergrounding utilities is a best practice in utilities planning and the city is interested in this process. In many cases, underground is covered in franchise agreements between the city and the utility provider, so the city should support efforts by private utilities to underground utilities infrastructure and should include underground in future franchising negotiations. Evaluate Life Cycle Costs In making decisions about both public and private investments in utilities infrastructure, the city should encourage decision makers to assess the life cycle costs of the proposed improvements. Life cycle cost analysis will ensure that decisions are based on a long-term assessment and will help the city maintain 8-137 Fiscal responsibility. Encourage Sustainability tracking Increasingly, private utilities are providing tools to customers to track usage and make informed decisions about their consumption. This can save money for individual consumers, but also improves the long-term sustainability of the city's available resources. Support Use Of Renewable Resources The Energy Independence Act applies to utilities providers with over 25,000 customers and requires covered companies to obtain 15% of their electricity from qualified renewable resources by 2020.Many providers have incorporated these targets into their integrated resources plans (IRPs), and the city should support these providers in their efforts to meet and exceed renewable energy standards. 8-138 i • 01 • f' c `) �A CHAPTER 9 Parks & Oper • _ . • .• •• i/fiifiiiiiiii�i�iiii/�iii�iiiiiiiii/iiiii✓ii�ii/r.�ri��iii/ir/i�iiiiiiii�/iiii��iiiiiiii�i�ii�il��i 'i i li��//�riiiiii�iii/,riiir --,.. • Introduction ...(.., \ WHY THE PARKS, RECREATION, OPEN SPACE, AND ARTS ELEMENT IS IMPORTANT The parks element provides the backbone to building formal and informal public spaces that support resident and visitor leisure time. The element provides a formal statement of the community's priorities as they relate to parks, recreation, open space, and art. Parks add to the quality of life for residents and to the value of nearby neighborhoods. The parks element in conjunctions with other elements of the comprehensive plan provide the full range of urban living. PLANNING CONTEXT The City has an adopted Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Plan (PROS).The PROS plan was developed to comply with the Washington Recreation and Conservation Office's planning guidelines in order to maintain grant eligibility. The plan was also based on an extensive public engagement program that included stakeholder interviews, workshops, an open house, and a survey.The PROS plan provides the direction,goals,policies,and implementation measures for parks and recreation within the City of Spokane Valley.The Spokane Valley Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Plan is adopted by this plan by reference, and is included as an appendix of this document. Washington State's Growth Management Act (GMA), RCW 36.70A.020.040, requires cities to consider as part of the development of their comprehensive plan the goal to "Retain open space, enhance recreation opportunities, REFERENCES KEY conserve fish and wildlife habitat, increase access to natural resource lands and O Refers to other section water,and develop parks and recreation facilities." 9-114 in plan The GMA, in RCW 36,70A.070 (9), also requires a Parks and Recreation Refers to other Spokane element be included in comprehensive plans. Specifically, the GMA requires ' Valley plans and official the element to include: documents • Estimates of park and recreation demand for at least a ten-year period Refers to other • Evaluation of facilities and service needs 0 non-Spokane Valley references for further • Evaluation of intergovernmental coordination opportunities to provide reading regional approaches for meeting park and recreation demand 9-140 However, the requirement to include a Park, Recreation, and Open Space element in the comprehensive plan is conditioned on the State Legislature providing funding. As of 2016 the Legislature has not provided such funding, so the City opts to include as an appendix to this plan the City of Spokane Valley Parks and Recreation Master Plan as amended, which meets GMA the mandates listed above. Current Conditions The City of Spokane Valley's parks system consists of developed formal parks, undeveloped natural areas, and trails. Throughout the City there are a mix of park types available for residents and visitors, including neighborhood, community, and large urban parks, and special use areas like pet parks, equestrian facilities, and a dance hall. The City also has a very small number of undeveloped sites to meet future recreational need. The City's adopted PROS plan provides a full accounting of the City's park system, levels of service standards,park users,and improvement priorities.The PROS plan also includes a financing plan that identifies how to pay for the improvements. Figure 41 provides a summary of the park system, identifying the park type and available amenities. The PROS plan provides additional detail about each park and/or area. 9-141 Figure 41. Summary of Park Conditions LEGEND V. Y Park Component Exists +� p d - Component Not Present N —o° in a10i o d c ccu 0 P Swimming Pool u E aoo m as au -TaC E `L° m g 0 C S Splash Pad s a N 0 n o m Q 0 Q " LL +° y N u O 3 '^ to -0 'L E U 1 00 ++ , y L U 0 C d N ea U -6 ti 2 in cn O t- m m a m a ce a Z a° E < w NEIGHBORHOOD PARK Balfour Park(2,8 acres) - - - Y - Y - Y - Y Y - - - - -- -- Browns Park(8,2 acres) Y Y - Y - Y - Y Y Y Y - - - - Castle Park (2.7 acres) Y - - Edgecliff Park(4.7 acres) Y Y - Y Y - Y Y Y Y Y - - - - - - Greenacres Park(6.3 acres) - Y S Y - - - Y Y Y Y Y - - - - - Terrace View Park(9.2 acres) Y Y P Y - - Y Y Y Y Y - - - - - - COMMUNITY PARKS Sullivan Park(16.1 acres) - - - Y - - - - Y Y Y - Y - Y - - Valley Mission Park (24 acres) Y Y P Y Y - Y Y Y Y Y - - - - - Y LARGE URBAN PARKS Mirabeau Point Park(42.0 acres) • Discovery Playground - S Y - - -- Y Y Y Y Y Y Y -- Y - • Mirabeau Meadows • Mirabeau Springs SPECIAL USE FACILITIES CenterPlace(13.6 acres) - Park Road Pool(2.0 acres) Western Dance Hall(Sullivan Park) - - - - Y - - - - TRAILS AND LINEAR PARKS Centennial Trail - - Y Y Y Appleway Trail - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - NATURAL OPEN SPACE AREAS Myrtle Point Park(31.1 acres) - UNDEVELOPED LANDS Valley Mission Park South(7.2 acres) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Balfour Park Extension(BA acres) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9-142 The PROS plan not only identified the exiting physical conditions and inventory of park facilities within the City, it also used an extensive public process to identify park needs.Some to the key findings from the PROS plan are identified below to illustrate the support the community has for parks, recreation, and open space. • Partnership - The City Parks and Recreation Department maintains an excellent relationship with schools and private sports program providers. The Department should continue these mutually beneficial relationships and work towards developing joint use agreements with the schools. • Spokane River - The Spokane River is an asset to the community and while there are a number of access locations, additional access should be considered to realize the full potential. Consideration for increased connectivity between parks via the river and water trail is important. • Neighborhood Parks - Providing park access to neighborhood kids should be the Parks Department's "highest calling." Ensuring that all areas of the community have park land accessible should be an important priority. • Economic Development - Access to parks or trails provides development and investment incentives, and most people like to live and/or work near parks.The City should consider taking advantage of sports related tourism by providing tournament quality facilities such as artificial turf and lighting. The City should also consider creating a set of park sign standards to help "brand" the Parks and Recreation Department. • Facility Types - Generally the type of facilities available are adequate. However, some facilities such as the horse arena at Valley Mission Park and the Western Dance Hall may be under-used and some modern facility types such as skate parks and pet parks are unavailable. The City should consider new modern facility types and perhaps repurposing older facility types. • Acquisition -As the City becomes more urban, there will be an increased need for park land especially to underserved areas, The amount of park land available is inadequate to meet present and future needs, especially as it relates to open space and athletic fields, but also important is park land with unique natural features or natural resources. • Management- Parks managed by the Spokane Valley Parks and Recreation Department are highly satisfactory to Spokane Valley residents. Residents 9-143 also felt the parks are clean and well-maintained, • Design- Park design should be flexible and be able to adapt to foreseeable changes in recreating needs and/or desires. Challenges and Opportunities The PROS plan does not specifically identify challenges and opportunities; however, based on the public process used in developing this plan in conjunction with the needs analysis and goals of the PROS, several challenges and opportunities can be identified. Enhance Outdoor Recrent-ion The City of Spokane Valley offers unmatched access to the Spokane River. The majority of the nearly 10 miles of shoreline is publically owned, most this ownership is by Washington State Parks. The Centennial Trail offers a paved shared use path that is grade separated for most of the River's path through the City. Increased formal access points to the Spokane River, like at Myrtle Point near CenterPlace, as well as increasing opportunities for north-south connections to the River and Centennial Trail is an important opportunity for this plan. Support Sports And Leisure Activities Youth sports is important to the City of Spokane Valley. There are two major youth sports activity centers near the City of Spokane Valley, Plante's Ferry and The Hub. Plante's Ferry offers outdoor sports with soccer and softball fields and the Hub offers indoor sports volleyball and basketball. Additionally, the City owns and operates eight sand volleyball courts and uses its established relationships with local school districts to support and supply youth sports activities. While some opportunities exist to provide additional fields locally, the City also supports improvements and expansions of regional sports centers like Plante's Ferry and the Hub. Develop Tourist Attractions The City of Spokane Valley owns a few unique recreation assets that are underused or undeveloped, like the horse arena at Mission Park, vacant property adjacent to Balfour Park, or vacant shoreline lands. Identifying opportunities for these sites is a priority and each could help expand the City's tourist attractions like a visitor's center, farmers'market, or a whitewater course with associated park. 9-144 Make Recreation Space Accessible The City of Spokane Valley was developed at suburban densities an important feature loved by residents. While the City has a number of neighborhood scale parks, there are areas that don't have access to park land, especially in the north part of the City. Opportunities for neighborhood scale parks are limited, so smaller scale park facilities may offer park space to residents.Additionally, the non-motorized travel network is limited and providing non-motorized access to parks will continue to be a challenge in the future. COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES Parks are often an immediate top-of-mind thought when residents think of services the City provides, and improving and maintaining them are typically a priority for residents. Parks and recreation are often an introduction to the community for visitors, and these amenities encourage visitors to stay longer. Thus, parks, recreation, open space, and the arts play a key role in being both a community priority, from a resident's perspective, and an economic development priority,from a tourist perspective. Improve the City's Image and Identity Parks and recreation facilities can be a sales pitch for the community to visitors, and the quality of these facilities and inherent recreation assets can therefore improve the image of Spokane Valley and build its brand. The following priorities represent opportunities to use parks, recreation and open spaces to strengthen the city's image: • Strengthen and improve the Valley's image and identity improve the City's key gateways,similar to the improvements made at Sprague and Appleway near 1-90. Take advantage of public property to create a sense of place, letting visitors and residents know they've arrived in the City of Spokane Valley • Leverage local and regional assets like the Centennial and Appleway Trails, the Spokane River, and community parks. Ensure that the goals and policies take advantage of assets regional recreational assets that visitors and residents use, and find ways to enhance their use and extend visitor stays. • Expand the City's role in existing events, regionally and locally. Look for ways to increase exposure for local destinations that are overlooked or 9-145 underused. Promote expanded athletic events held in and around the City • Grow Spokane Valley's market share of tourism by investing in new tourist attractions that support the recreational and open space assets and values of the community. • Enhance and develop opportunities to support the local and regional arts. BEST PRACTICES AND REQUIRED MEASURES The update of this comprehensive plan identified both best practices and required measures.These best practices and required measures, include: • Coorctinate with other recreation providers to ensure efficient service where possible • Ensure PROS plan projects are consistent with the Capital Facilities Plan • Use the PROS plan to provide equitable distribution of park facilities • Use multifunctional infrastructure to minimize maintenance and operating costs 9-146 ( ) Introduction WHY THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT ELEMENT IS IMPORTANT The Natural Environment Element combines several environmental- ly environmental topics, including critical areas (wetlands, aquifer recharge areas, fish and wildlife habitat areas, frequently flooded areas, and geologically hazardous areas),surface water quality and quantity, shorelines,and air quality. The diversity of Spokane Valley's natural environment is illustrated by ecosystems that range from the foothills of Mt. Spokane to the low-lying Rathdrum Prairie floodplains along the Spokane River. This diversity supports a broad spectrum of wildlife, from the moose of Mt. Spokane to the interior red-band trout in the Spokane River. Throughout the region, lakes, rivers, wetlands, and associated riparian areas provide linkages and corridors for wildlife. Spokane Valley's natural environment also includes the Spokane Valley/Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer, one of the most productive aquifers in the United States. Spokane Valley's economic development success in recent years is partially attributable to natural amenities that make the area beautiful and supply it with an array of recreation opportunities.The purpose of this chapter is to coordinate planning efforts to protect,preserve and enhance this unique natural environment. By ensuring the availability of clean air and water and preserving critical areas and natural features, Spokane Valley will continue to grow as a healthy, sustainable and inviting community. REFERENCES KEY t3 Refers to other section PLANNING CONTEXT 9 114 in plan Balancing the conservation and protection of the natural environment with population growth, economic development goals, and increasing recreational •!.' Refers to other Spokane access is a key purpose of statewide planning rules and regulations. Direction SV Valley plans and official is provided through statewide planning goals, the Growth Management Act documents (GMA), and the Shoreline Management Act(SMA).Statewide Planning Goal 10 Refers to other (RCW 36.70A.020) instructs jurisdictions to "Protect the environment and enhance 0 non-Spokane Valley the state's high quality of life, including air and water quality,and the availability of references for further water." reading The GMA requires local governments to adopt ordinances that limit • development in and near environmentally sensitive areas, which it refers to as //////////////////////////rI///////I///f//// critical areas. Critical areas include wetlands, aquifer recharge areas, fish and 10-148 wildlife habitat, frequently flooded areas, and geologically hazardous areas. During municipal incorporation in 2003, the City adopted Spokane County's Critical Areas Ordinance(CAO)as an interim measure to regulate development in and near critical areas and thereby comply with the GMA. The City has prepared an updated CAO to provide regulations that are specific to the City's unique natural environment. This Natural Environment Element of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan (SVCP) provides the foundation for the CAO and other municipal plans and regulations, and provides context for the establishment of goals and policies related the City's Natural Environments. Pursuant to the GMA, the City is required to designate natural resource lands and critical areas. Critical areas are discussed in more detail below. With regard to natural resources, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.170, the City is required to designate "where appropriate...[a]gricultural lands...[f]orestlands...[andj [m] ineral resource lands that are not already characterized by urban growth and that have long-term significance for the extraction of minerals...." Further, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.060, the City is required to adopt development regulations to ensure conservation of mineral resource lands designated pursuant to RCW 36,70A,170. During its first update, the City did not designate any mineral resource lands and, further, it has not designated any mineral resource lands since 2006. However, the consideration of mineral resource land designation is an important one for the City,as the City currently has several existing active surface (sand and gravel) mines. These take up significant acreage and even with appropriate reclamation planning, create long-term impacts that can limit or preclude future industrial, commercial, or other productive use of the site, even after the mine closes. Although the City has existing mines and desires to allow those uses to continue, the City has determined not to designate any mineral resource lands at this time as such designation is not appropriate due to the extensive urban characteristics surrounding the mines and the wide availability of the gravel within the region as described further below. Current Conditions The majority of Spokane Valley is developed for residential, commercial or industrial uses. Above ground, undeveloped natural areas within the City are generally located along the Spokane River and local streams, including associated riparian areas and wetlands, Natural, undeveloped areas are also found on forested cliffs and steep slopes, open areas between the Spokane River and Trent Avenue east of Millwood, and public parks such Mirabeau Point Park and Sullivan Park. These natural environments provide important 10-149 recreational and scenic amenities to the City, as well as habitat for fish, birds, and terrestrial wildlife. Additionally, the majority of the City is underlain by a shallow aquifer that provides high quality drinking water and groundwater inputs to the Spokane River. The aquifer moves through coarse gravels deposited by historic flood events, These gravels provide mineral resources, which are actively mined at various gravel quarries within the City. Natural areas are protected by various federal, state, and local plans or laws. This section describes the current condition of natural areas in the City within the context of these laws, which regulate critical areas, surface water, air quality,and shoreline areas. MINERAL. RESOURCE LANDS The City has undertaken an extensive review process to determine the availability, need, and appropriateness for mineral resource designation and protection within the City. It has conducted interviews with stakeholders; reviewed mineral resource needs due to estimated future construction utilizing information obtained from USGS, Department of Natural Resources, stakeholders,WSDOT and Spokane County; reviewed access to and availability of mineral resources through materials provided by the Department of Natural Resources and has analyzed the current urban characteristics surrounding the existing mines within the City. Based on data from the Department of Natural Resources, the City currently has 18 permitted surface mines with 5 of them having an active status and the remainder an inactive status. The permitted area of the active mines totals 465 acres. The mined sand and gravel is used extensively in construction projects around the region. Reclamation for the closed mines generally consists of landscape planting and some reshaping of the slopes. Several of the mines have deep excavations that have exposed the Spokane Valley - Rathdrum Prairie (SVRP)Aquifer. The areas around the open mines generally consist of urban areas with developed industrial and heavy commercial uses, although one newer mine (Eden Pit No. 55-06) has open land to its north that is currently zoned for industrial use. All but one (Eden Pit No. 55-06) of the existing active mines have been in operation since the City's incorporation. Other than permitting mining in the heavy industrial zone, the City has not had additional protective regulations for the mines as it did not designate any mineral resource lands in the 2006 Comprehensive Plan. Due to the urban growth immediately surrounding the mines, additional protections for mining could likely negatively impact other existing industrial and commercial uses. 10-150 The mines within the City are but a small part of the extensive approximately 73 active mines within the County. Mining is common throughout the region due to the extensive deep flood deposits of high quality sand and gravel and similar alluvium that compose SVRP Aquifer which are easily accessed due to the typically very thin overburden. Additionally,there are numerous rock mines within the County. These flood deposits extend from Lake Pend Oreille on the east to the West Plains west of Spokane on the west. Accordingly, there are adequate options for gravel mining outside of the City and indeed such mining has and is already occurring. CRI TICAL- AREAS Per the GMA, jurisdictions are required to protect critical areas through the adoption of policies and regulations. Critical areas include: (a) wetlands; (b) areas with a critical recharging effect on aquifers used for domestic purposes; (c)fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas;(d)frequently flooded areas;and (e)geologically hazardous areas. Spokane Valley recognizes the importance of protecting the ecological functions and societal values provided by critical areas. These natural systems play valuable roles in stormwater disposal, flood prevention, and water quality preservation, as well as provide recreational opportunities. Protection of critical areas makes economic sense because the alternative is development of expensive engineered systems for protection from floods and geological hazards and for purification of drinking water,or regulations that are restrictive and expensive to implement, as necessary to restore declining populations of sensitive species. 10-151 WETI ANDS There are few wetlands in the City (Figure X); however, each plays a valuable role in providing aquatic habitat, preserving water quality and maintaining water storage.Wetland types in the City include marshes, prairies, shrublands, forests,and vegetated ponds. By storing floodwaters,wetlands reduce flooding and downstream erosion, trap and absorb sediments, and help protect water quality. Furthermore, wetlands discharge water to aquifers and streams, help replenish groundwater, and maintain base flows of surface water systems. In addition to these water quality and water storage functions, wetlands also provide habitat that is locally limited for birds, mammals, amphibians, reptiles, insects, and occasionally fish. Most wetlands within the City are associated with streams, Shelley Lake, or historical mining.They tend to be most affected by runoff from adjacent roadways and developed residential and commercial lands. Wetland quality is assessed by a wetland rating system developed by the Washington State Department of Ecology in 2004. In planning for development in or near wetlands, the City strives to ensure that the critical functions of wetlands are not impacted, or, if impacts cannot be avoided, that they are compensated for elsewhere as part of the development project. AQUIFER RECI TARGE AREAS The Spokane Valley/Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer supplies potable water to most of the residents of Spokane County. The aquifer and associated recharge areas underlie the entire City of Spokane Valley (see Map 8,2). The aquifer begins in northern Idaho between Spirit Lake and the south end of Lake Pend Oreille.The aquifer flows south and west under Spokane Valley and downtown Spokane.The aquifer then turns north and discharges into the Little Spokane River.Aquifer deposits range from 150 feet to more than 600 feet in depth. 10.152 Due to concerns regarding the maintenance of water quality of the aquifer, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency designated the Spokane Valley/ Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer a "Sole Source Aquifer'in 1978.The aquifer was only the second in the nation to receive such a designation. Although the aquifer provides high quality drinking water, it is highly susceptible to contamination due to the underlying geology of the area, which consists of sandy, gravelly glacial outwash that allows surface water to infiltrate rapidly. The aquifer is dynamic, with close to 1 billion gallons of water flowing into and out of the system each day.The Spokane River provides about 49 % of the aquifer inflow and 59 % of the aquifer outflow. The Spokane River stretch through Spokane Valley is primarily a gaining reach where the river gains water from the aquifer) Since 1977, fifty monitoring wells in Washington and twenty-eight wells in Idaho have been installed to monitor the impacts of land surface activities over the aquifer. The primary concern in the aquifer has been nitrate, which may cause health problems above certain levels in drinking water. Septic systems, fertilizer, and stormwater are typically major contributors to elevated nitrate levels in the aquifer.Ongoing programs,including stormwater management and installation of sewers, have decreased nitrate levels in the aquifer. Monitoring efforts indicate that contaminants have reached the aquifer; however, the aquifer water quality remains very good.' Spokane County.2009.The Spokane Valley-Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer Atlas.Available at:http:// www.spokanecounty.org/data/utili deswgmp/aquifer_atlas/Aquifer%20Atlas%20W E B%20res.pdf. 10-153 FISI I AND WILDLIFE I IABI [Al Fishing and the observation of wildlife are valued recreational activities that contribute to the local economy and quality of life in Spokane Valley. Priority Fish and wildlife habitat areas, as designated by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (Figure 42), are considered critical areas and are necessary for both native resident and seasonal migratory animal species, Habitat conservation areas may include open areas with species richness, breeding habitat, winter range, migration corridors, and habitats that are of limited availability or high vulnerability to alteration, such as cliffs, talus, and wetlands, Chester Creek and Saltese Creek do not fall within the state's shoreline jurisdiction, but they contain valuable riparian habitat that provides shade, food,and cover for fish and wildlife species.The Washington State Department of Natural Resources Water Typing maps identify these streams as containing fish. These streams, and other unnamed drainages generally infiltrate into the ground before reaching the Spokane River above ground,This means that they provide important aquifer recharge functions and that, if contaminated, they could contaminate the aquifer. Urban landscaping, parks,and open spaces supplement fish and wildlife habitat areas by providing cover, food, or nest areas for a wide variety of wildlife. The loss of natural wildlife habitat to urban development can be partially offset by landscaping that includes a variety of native plants that provide food and shelter for wildlife. 10-154 Figure 42. Map of Critical Areas FREQUENTLY FLOODED AREAS Frequently flooded areas are lands in the floodplain subject to a one % or greater chance of flooding in any given year. These areas include, hut are not limited to, streams, rivers, lakes, sink areas, major natural drainageways, and wetlands. They are natural physical features of a watershed that play an important role in stormwater storage and disposal. Maintenance of the natural function of these areas protects residences, structures, and infrastructure and reduces the need to construct flood control facilities. These areas are designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as the 100-year floodplain and are shown in Figure 43. The City supports improved modelling of floodplains and floodways that minimize constraints on affected land uses. The City actively works to facilitate floodplain mapping updates. The City regulates floodplain development in accordance with Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC) Chapter 10-155 21.30 Floodplain Regulations. Any development on a parcel located within a special flood hazard area requires a Floodplain Permit. Areas with known floodplain issues include Forker Draw and the Glenrose drainage area.Spokane County is actively working to reduce flooding in the Glenrose Watershed, which presents an opportunity for coordinated flood hazard reduction. Figure 43. Map of Regional Water Features GEOLOGICALLY HAZARDOUS AREAS Geologically hazardous areas are areas that because of their susceptibility to erosion, sliding, earthquakes, or other geological events are not suited for development, Geologically hazardous areas include both erosion and landslide hazard areas where one or more of the following exist: • A slope of 25 %or greater 10-156 • Soils identified by the Natural Resource Conservation Service as having a severe potential for erosion • Hydraulic factors such as existing on-site surface and groundwater or changes in hydraulic factors caused by proposals that create a severe potential for erosion or landslide hazard • Areas that historically have been prone to landslide,which include active fault lines, areas adjacent to lakes, streams, springs, or any one of the following geologic formations: alluvium, landslide deposit, or Latah formation • Areas of uncompacted fill • Areas that are unstable as a result of rapid stream or stream bank erosion Figure 44 depicts the location of geologically hazardous areas within and adjacent to Spokane Valley. Figure 44. Map of Geological Hazards 10-157 SLi:;Ewc:c w\T F•R Water quality and quantity influences the domestic,economic,and recreational quality,and maintains the natural environments of Spokane Valley. Historically, clean water has been taken for granted. As growth and development have increased, so have problems associated with maintaining water quality and quantity. Industry, business, agriculture, and commercial and residential development all contribute to reduced water quality and quantity. To ensure that water quality and storage capacity are maintained as the City continues to grow and develop, a comprehensive approach must be taken to ensure future water quality and quantity. Spokane Valley has a limited number of surface water bodies, which include the Spokane River and Shelley Lake. The Spokane River provides the region with significant economic, recreation,wildlife habitat,and aesthetic value.The Spokane River is included in the State's "303d" inventory as having impaired water quality for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodiben- zo-p-dioxin, lead, and zinc within Spokane Valley. To address these issues, the Washington Department of Ecology and other agencies have ongoing water quality improvement projects in the Spokane River, and the Spokane River Regional Toxics Task Force was established in January 2012. There are currently Total Maximum Daily Load projects for dissolved oxygens, dissolved metals,and PCBs." The use of the Spokane River as a receiving water for sewage effluent discharges and stormwater runoff makes it an important resource for waste assimilation. Pumping from the Spokane Valley/Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer has a direct effect on the Spokane River,primarily by reducing the flow in the river.The increased impervious area resulting From development changes the amount and the quality of runoff water. If left unmanaged,discharges of stormwater can cause flooding and water quality degradation, especially in water bodies like the Spokane River that are already impaired. Increases in impervious area may also adversely affect groundwater recharge, which is important for sustained base flow support in the Spokane River. This happens when precipitation that would otherwise be stored in the ground and gradually drain to the river during the summer months is, instead, intercepted by impervious areas and delivered directly into the river via stormwater infrastructure. Long-term solutions to stormwater problems require creative problem solving ii Ecology.2012.Spokane River Water Quality Improvement Projects.Available at:http://www. ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/tindl/spokaneriver/. 10-158 on a case-by-case basis. In areas where development has already occurred, much of the natural stormwater system may be altered so that it no longer functions effectively. In these areas, stormwater regulations should target redevelopment, voluntary treatment enhancements, wetland conservation, and capital improvements in City treatment facilities. In areas where wetlands are filled or natural drainageways are altered, the cost of replacing natural water quality treatment functions with engineered stormwater treatment facilities can be substantial. In currently developing areas where stormwater disposal has not yet become a problem, it is important to preserve the natural drainageways and pervious characteristics of the landscape to prevent problems from occurring as a result of future development.In addition,studies have found that incorporating low impact development (LID) features to manage stormwater often result in higher property values compared to development without those features, and LID sites can often have reduced costs over the long-term."' `;I-IORE.LINES Waters with a mean annual flow of greater than 20 cubic feet per second(in the case of flowing water) or an area greater than 20 acres (in the case of standing water) are considered Shorelines of the State and are subject to the Shoreline Management Act(SMA).Within the City,the Spokane River and Shelley Lake are the only two Shorelines of the State managed under the City of Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program (SMP). The extent of SMP jurisdiction includes the body of water together with an adjacent strip of land 200 feet wide, measured landward from the ordinary high water mark(common high water line of stream or lake). Note that other waters within the City, including Saltese Creek and Chester Creek, although not regulated under the City's SMP, are important water resources and are protected under the City's CAO regulations as fish and wildlife habitat, The GMA(RCW 36.70A.480) requires that cities include the goals and policies of the adopted SMP in the comprehensive plan. The City's comprehensive SMP update was approved by Ecology in August 2015, The update revised the existing shoreline program, including the goals, policies, regulations, shoreline environment designations(SEDs),and administrative procedures and definitions. Due to the length of the SMP goals and policies, they can be referenced on Ecology's website (See Chapter 2) and are not reproduced in detail here. However, this section describes the overarching goal of the SMA, and the SEDs in an effort to summarize the plan for managing the City's shorelines. Ecology.2016.Municipal 5tormwater Low Impact Development(LID)Resources.Available at: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/stormwater/rnunicipal/LID/Resources.html 10-154 The overarching goal of the SMA is to prevent the inherent harm in uncoordinated and piecemeal development of the state's shorelines.Shorelines are among the most ecologically productive and fragile of environments in the City. The intent of the City's SMP is to foster reasonable and appropriate use of the shorelines while protecting their natural character, preserving the ecology and resources, improving public access, and increasing recreational opportunities for the public. The SEDs developed for the SMP are based on existing land use patterns, the biological and physical character of the shoreline, and the goals and aspirations of the community. SEDs are analogous to zoning designations for areas within the shoreline jurisdiction. SEDs provide a uniform basis for applying policies and use regulations within each designation and are intended to encourage appropriate uses and activities while providing for protection and restoration of shoreline ecological functions. It is anticipated that reasonable standards, restrictions, and prohibitions on shoreline developments will be instituted as shoreline regulations, This is necessary so that shoreline development will reasonably protect existing uses and shoreline character and ensure "no net loss" of shoreline ecological functions is achieved, Characteristics and general management policies for each of the designations can be found in the SMP. Spokane Valley is unique in its application of shoreline regulations with regard to riparian setbacks. Rather than applying generic shoreline setback widths as other cities have done, riparian setbacks in Spokane Valley are based on existing or potential high-quality shoreline resources that should be conserved to ensure no net loss of shoreline ecological functions. AIR QUALITY Air quality in the Spokane Valley region is affected by both human and natural causes. Human activities, including automobile use, wood stove use, and industrial and agricultural operations generate airborne substances that can affect air quality. In addition, the entire region has been affected substantially by windblown dust from the central portion of the state. The Spokane Valley is also a natural basin in which air pollution is trapped and concentrated by an occasional temperature inversion (a situation in which lighter warm air overlies heavier cool air). A variety of air pollution control strategies have been employed across the region. The strategies include auto emission inspections, restrictions on open burning, wood stove certification and restriction on wood stove use 10-160 when pollution levels are high, oxygenated fuels for cars, road paving, use of chemical deicers as an alternative to road sanding,and others.These measures combined with cleaner-burning cars have significantly improved the region's air quality. However, traffic volumes continue to increase, which could lead to degradation of air quality in the future. Air quality is inextricably linked to land use and transportation patterns. The challenge presented to the region is to balance land use, transportation, and air quality in such a way that the community can continue to grow and prosper without compromising quality of life. Challenges and Opportunities The primary challenge for Spokane Valley is to protect the City's natural environment while allowing for human use and economic growth. Without established codes and policies for the designation and protection of important natural resource areas,developers may not see the benefit of protecting natural resources, incorporating LID measures, and preserving valuable ecological functions such as water storage and treatment. Challenges specific to the City include: • Maintaining water quality and flows in the Spokane River • Preventing contamination of the City's high quality groundwater and providing for adequate aquifer recharge • Managing stormwater to minimize flooding and the impairment of surface waters • Ensuring adequate protection of natural resources while supporting new development • Developing resource conservation plans based on limited or inaccurate natural resource inventory data layers • Maintaining air quality as the population increases • Mineral resource challenges TMD Conservation land uses provide opportunities to benefit both humans and fish and wildlife. For example, protecting wetlands and natural habitats will benefit fish and wildlife as well as human recreational opportunities. Managing stormwater runoff, aquifer recharge areas, and geologically hazardous areas will also help reduce the potential for property damages and protect drinking 10-161 water quality. A protected and healthy natural environment can also attract new businesses by offering desirable aesthetics and recreation opportunities. Specific opportunities include; • Partnering with county and state government partners to pool watershed and stormwater planning resources • Mineral resources are sufficiently abundant within the region such that the industry can continue to prosper within the City without the need to designate lands solely for this land use • The City has the opportunity to develop updated data inventory layers, including wetland and stream mapping,and hsh presence assessments • Incorporating low impact development strategies into the City's development code can minimize harm to the City's aquifer and natural areas. • Planning for habitat conservation and restoration in public parks and open spaces can improve aesthetics and habitat quality for local native wildlife. • Improved floodplain delineation mapping may free up developable land uses that are no longer constrained by the cost of floodplain insurance COMMUNITYAND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES Leveraging Natural Assets The community and economic development priorities can be strategically linked to natural environment protections. A healthy, robust natural environment can improve the quality of life, which will attract new businesses and residents. Development should not be allowed to encroach into critical areas, and LID measures should be encouraged to minimize impacts to water quality and quantity. BEST PRACTICES & REQUIRED MEASURES Incorporating Stormwater Best Management Practices Incorporating best management practices in stormwater is cost effective and good for water and habitat quality. In the upcoming years, local codes and ordinances will need to incorporate these practices, including low impact development measures, in order to receive a municipal stormwater permit from the Department of Ecology. 10-162 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Administrative report — request for resolution supporting John Wayne Pioneer Trail. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: NA. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Request from Councilmember Wood to consider adoption of a resolution supporting the continued existence of the John Wayne Pioneer Trail. BACKGROUND: The John Wayne Pioneer Trail is a "rails-to-trails" project that connects with several other similar trails to form a nearly continuous trail system that runs from Washington's border with Idaho near Tekoa, to North Bend, approximately 300 miles. A map is attached for more information on the entire system. Spokane Valley City Councilmembers received an email from Ted Blaszak, a Councilmember in Tekoa and also the President of the Tekoa Trail and Trestle Association, asking for the City's support for the Trail. Several jurisdictions in Washington have adopted resolutions very similar to the draft resolution included in this packet. Washington State Parks has been studying issues relating to this trail system, as set forth in an August 8, 2016 story in the Spokesman-Review. There are differing views on whether the Trail system should be maintained and enhanced. OPTIONS: (1) Schedule the draft resolution for motion consideration; (2) Request additional information from staff. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Staff will look for direction from the Council. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Unknown. STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney. ATTACHMENTS: (1) Draft resolution supporting the John Wayne Pioneer Trail; (2) Map of the John Wayne Pioneer Trail, along with connected trails; and (3) Spokesman-Review article dated August 8, 2016. DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 16-00* A RESOLUTION REGARDING THE PRESERVATION OF THE JOHN WAYNE PIONEER TRAIL AS A RECREATIONAL AMENITY FOR CITIZENS ACROSS WASHINGTON,AND OTHER MATTERS RELATED THERETO. WHEREAS, the John Wayne Pioneer Trail is a 300 mile long stretch of former railway roadbed that runs from the western slopes of the Cascade Mountains to the Idaho border, and is the longest rail trail in the United States; and WHEREAS, the Washington State Parks Department and the Washington State Department of Natural Resources own the land the trail sits on; and WHEREAS,in 2002,the John Wayne Pioneer Trail was designated a National Recreational Trail by the federal government; and WHEREAS, the John Wayne Pioneer Trail is used by cyclists and horse riders, including the John Wayne Pioneer Wagons and Riders Association for their annual "Ride Across Washington" event; and WHEREAS, Fish Lake Trail,which turns into the Columbia Plateau Trail near Cheney,provides a direct connection from the City of Spokane to the John Wayne Pioneer Trail for recreational enthusiasts in the greater Spokane area; and WHEREAS, the City of Spokane has spent more than $3 million on improving the Fish Lake Trail, and long term plans anticipate spending another $4 million for the final phase of improvements; and WHEREAS,there have been recent discussions and suggestions regarding potentially closing the John Wayne Pioneer Trail east of the Columbia River; and WHEREAS, the closure of the John Wayne Pioneer Trail would decrease recreational opportunities for the citizens in the entire area, including Spokane Valley, and close a critical connection to Fish Lake Trail/Columbia Plateau Trail, and forfeit the right-of-way for any possible future rail transport connection; and WHEREAS, adjacent landowners have brought forward concerns about ongoing maintenance of the John Wayne Pioneer Trail. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County,Washington as follows: Section 1. Support for Preservation of the John Wayne Pioneer Trail. The City Council of the City of Spokane Valley expresses its support for the preservation of the John Wayne Pioneer Trail so that it can continue to serve as a recreational amenity for the residents of the state, including Spokane Valley, and so that it can continue to provide economic development opportunities to the communities adjacent to and near the Trail's route. Resolution 16-00* -John Wayne Pioneer Trail - 1 - DRAFT Section 2. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. Adopted this day of September,2016. City of Spokane Valley R.L. Higgins,Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Resolution 16-00* -John Wayne Pioneer Trail -2 - • r North F3erti 11 i 014 f e Cheney Trailhead _d ifjc lir _ , ' 1 Fish Lake Trail (City of Spokane) _f " "• i. Martin Road Trailhead t — er:„.es.:_fp.,, Tei�� ...:,..,„,,,,N, \----\-i---'\-\\_,54 Ra airden Lind I Malden I Vont age Rop al City , Junction Othello PuIllrnan ? . i Kehlotts Trallhead �1_ _ I, 1 ‘))). Trl Citi:'� Iii, ._ , ,• r' �l Legend Iron florae State Park Trair E Milwaukee Road-INR Section -__ nc Milwaukee Road-Active Rail ai oa Columbia Plateau State Park Trod N Klickttat State Park Trail w E - Spokane River Cameo mai State Park Trail 0 15 30 60 Miles — CountyLioe s I 1 I I 1 I I I I • -Train-lead John Wayne Trail gets vote of confidence from State Parks panel r { 14. = k '7, Nilej r ,' , k4:4 ,, . .: , — — , . . r w 51. , j Pr k a7 7 s M �.� ria .•�: •� Pat Sprute, left, and Chip Andrus of Spokane cycle on the abandoned railway called the John Wayne Trail near Rosalia. (Rich Landers/The Spokesman-Review) TRAILS -- Development of the John Wayne Pioneer Trail was backed by the Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission last week. The citizen panel adopted policy to move ahead with developing the cross-state trail system along abandoned railways. Meeting in Clarkston, the commission also approved land classifications and long-term boundaries for the Iron Horse State Park Trail between the Columbia River and Malden in Eastern Washington. The Iron Horse State Park segment from the Columbia to the Idaho border was acquired from the Milwaukee Railroad and named the John Wayne Pioneer Trail by the Washington Legislature in the early 1980s but has never been developed. The actions followed months of working group meetings and public meetings for a John Wayne Iron Horse State Park Trail Plan to address issues such as noxious weeds, vegetation management and trespass and fencing concerns expressed by property owners who live and work adjacent to the trail. The plan identifies needed support facilities, including trailheads, bridge and trestle repairs and future camping opportunities. A 12-member advisory committee was appointed late last year to advise park staff in the planning. The committee includes adjacent landowners, hikers and equestrians, as well as representatives of tourism bureaus and heritage organizations. The advisory committee met five times in Moses Lake between December 2015 and late June 2016, and State Parks additionally held four public meetings in Cheney, Ellensburg, Preston and Ritzville to gather public feedback for the plan. The plan considers acquiring or developing agreements to manage existing gaps in land ownership, including about 4 miles of private property and 40 miles managed by the state Department of Natural Resources. The 2006 Washington Legislature directed State Parks to manage the portion of trail east of Lind. One element of the plan will have State Parks working with the advisory committee to settle on a new trail name that is broadly recognizable and establishes a marketable identity for the trail. Currently the trail is called by two names—John Wayne Pioneer Trail and Iron Horse State Park Trail. "The resolution adopted by the Commission highlights State Parks' commitment to long-term development and operation of Washington's cross-state trail system, including completing development on the entire length of the Iron Horse State Park Trail Corridor between Rattlesnake Lake and the Idaho border and highlighting the importance of connecting to a national network of long-distance rails trails," State Parks officials said in a statement. "All over the country, trails like these provide significant health, tourism and economic benefits," said Commission Chair Steve Milner of Chelan. "We look forward to more effectively responding to the interests of both adjacent landowners and the recreating public. "My reading is that rural economies want the trail as a tourism and economic development tool. Recreation users want to experience the natural and cultural history of Eastern Washington. And trail neighbors want the trail corridor to be kept free of noxious weeds, safe from trespassers and managed in a manner that doesn't impede the agricultural activities on their land. I think we can be successful on all fronts by working together." About the Iron Horse State Park Trail Iron Horse State Park Trail parallels 1-90, running 287 miles along the defunct trestles, rail beds and tunnels of the Old Chicago Milwaukee Saint Paul and Pacific railroads. The trail starts just east of North Bend and runs east to the Idaho border. About 110 miles of trail on the west end have been improved for use by hikers, bicyclists and equestrians. The terrain varies from the evergreen forests and subalpine lakes of the western Cascades, to the shrub steppes and channeled scablands of eastern Washington. The corridor was acquired by the state of Washington in 1981. In 2006, the State Legislature directed State Parks to manage the portion of the trail that lies east of Lind. The Iron Horse trail is part of a developing statewide network of Washington rail trails that also includes the Columbia Plateau Trail, Spokane Centennial Trail and Klickitat Trail in Eastern Washington and the Willapa Hills Trail in Southwest Washington. The state's cross-state trail system is part of the national trails movement. According to the Rails-to-Trails Conservancy, more than 21,000 miles of rail trails are used by tens of millions of Americans each year. Posted Aug. 8, 2016, 8 a.m. in: bicycling, John Wayne Trail, outdoors, rail trail, trails CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: New City Hall — Project Update GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Multiple meetings, Council retreat 02-17-15; Administrative Report 03-17-15, Motion Consideration 03-24-15, Study Session 09-15-15, Motion Consideration 09-29-15, Interior Discussion 11-18-15, Heating and Cooling Discussions on 12-1-15 and 12-15-15, Interior and Exterior Discussion 12-29-15, General updates on 01-19- 16 and 02-02-16, Final design discussion on 02-16-16 and Approval of City Hall Plan authorization to proceed with bid process on 02-23-16; Admin report on bid results at Council's 4-26-16 meeting; Bid Award on May 3, 2016; Admin Report on Project Update on August, 16, 2016. BACKGROUND: City Council and staff have been working since early 2015 on the design of the New City Hall building. Construction of the project began on May 31, 2016. Staff will give a brief update on the current status of the project. OPTIONS: Discussion RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The City Hall construction project is anticipated to cost $14.4 million including land acquisition, design services, and construction. This project will be funded through a General Obligation bond which will be authorized by City Council through a separate motion. STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Worley, CIP Manager Eric Guth, Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint Presentation Spokane Valley �C • t H all u dae „.„„ri.,;:„.„..,„„,_„::_i:,:;ii..f„!,,_;,,,._,,_4 � , _ „ , ,,,,, _______._ ,_ L.,,ai .,,,.:,..,..___,, , _. _.___,_____ ,4,‘„,,,,_„_,,,, __. -_,„----- ..„ ..,,:,,,,„,,,,:,,,i;:„._„.,:: , .,.: ,,,,,,,„,,,__„, , ._ „ _ _______.„ _.._,.. .,„_,,_.-14,-, A r - cnrlw1gC i% _try r�av ups 1- 4 Spokane `valley Schedule • Construction Began May 31 , 2016 • Groundbreaking " �- r - LI :- Ceremony - June 9 , 2016 im • Substantial Completion Y tii i 1 August 31 2017 i ,A 1, • Final Completion September 30 , 2017 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Spokane Valley- Progress - Week 12 , _. „:.,„''''....t, ,,,---,,,,,,,W,i,iE 01,47....77:1-',.4,4, I 0 iA S - . .4011j1„E ? - ?r L !. ' wiz s ! mob'& Ts' P: Foundation Backfill PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Spokane a valley Progress — Week 12 _._..,...„.„..,_... __,..______ __._ __, „._ ., • A a -- --!---.1----, a" .a- (I f f T 9 r tea . @� t �� ;,,-,:----7—:—.:,--'-.4--.:-.E .`?'r '.r-.;;:;: _ ..�' j,�,_ <J'ar% sdr :v im. ._ r .,.. .. -. _,,-:‘,-,10:::'.:; ay -_$ �a;..,-. ' 1st Floor Steel DeckingSlab on Grade . rep South Wing North Wing PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Spokane valley Progress — Week 13 ,, ,____.. ,. _ . _ _ ______________,_ ____, , _ _ . . _ _ ... , • . 1 groPPw -i, I' wi ge. ,......._ -- -t s _., , _.,, ii el - , . • , 1 ,,,,... : . . , „ ,.,,. , , __ . .._-_- , . . „, ... _,.. , ____ ._. .. • ,.. ....... . __, . ,. . . , „,„ „ s . ,..._ , __. _ .. .., I e. j ..-.511W,„ ',....- -=I”7,, '....-- -----',;1414146.---. - -__-__„..:. . P .. R w_ 7- =ate, Basement Slab Prep & 1st Floor Structural Steel Erection PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Spokane valley- Progress - Week 13 ., -;,, 1 , 4 1: _:_li ; j ' -- --- _-- 3 :71-: '-' = , _ _ ------.,- - _ .____._,-„ , „_ _ i -144,... --- wk,- _ --- _,-.„70-----.„ -;,--„, _ ,._...:,. 7,--_,,,-, - ---- ___....-,-„,..., ---17,,,,„,...,- . _ -_,.:.- .. .--7, ..„, ,.,,,..„--_,,,.,,,,,,- �� 7 • 1St Floor South Slab on Deck PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Pro ress - Buildingvalley to: — , . .,,,'--' ki .,.. _. ..., _ - ,--' -'-A\\'\ ��„�` 9, J \ ' . • \ ) z . . litit 47., lifr:-.2-i-.-....r.-:.-_- _:'-‘4 ' <-1::7. .--...41,,,- -_,••,:-4A. . , \ \, ,'-,-,T,„ '._ '* 4,,Allit 4,4.-, / :,-1-.-- --.::7:A ' ,;-i.. w e \\ .-.. , / \z,‘\,,, ,,,: . - : „ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Spokane Valley Progress - Site ..__ _ _. v . _ _ _____________ __ i _ ,;.: -i-T.- 1 ' ' "---.... ' ' s W :-/- ., PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Spokane Additional Information • 20% Schedule Completed • $ 1 , 042 , 756 paid to Contractor ( 10 . 7% ) • 47 Requests for Information ( RFI ) Answered • 152 Submittal Packages Reviewed PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Spokane Additional Information • Pending Change Orders : — Hazardous Material Removal — Site Electrical Additions/Deletions — Delete Under Slab Plumbing/Reduce Slab to 4" — Under Slab Plumbing Additions — Mechanical Chase Revisions (credit anticipated) — Top of Basement Wall Insulation Addition PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Spokane Additional Information • Upcoming Activities — Continue Structural Steel Erection — Backfill North Wing — 1st Floor Decking & Concrete — North Wing — 2nd Floor Decking — North & South Wing — Form & Pour Shear Walls PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Spokane Additional Information Additional Activities ✓ Move-in Committee Established ✓ Furniture Vendor selection in process ✓ ITS Conduit — Appleway to City Hall Site PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Sp .....----"N...,_ t, l'okane .....Valley Questions • „/II if .,... - is,' ..,._ _...'-_, . ,-,-,--,_-_- fe --,':- -. - ' • . - - . . .-72-rr.7.c,- ” ..,_ •. -•- ,*" .:• -,"''.'-,-----------' ' - . - -' ,''''' -1,._,-.,.-_ ,--_,...r.; -..,,i,__,, , , I z,,,, iiiiHr . ..., ---,, _ .E.--:-- -,_-_-- - -4,-, --- ,..-:-.--, ;;'t--,c,A:. ,.:.:_-_---_ ,-.„*.,_,,,•-•_ __ .,.. . ._ , _.:,..„, A` .„.. . --,.. . 4- g. i'l_ 1,. • _ __ ,,,,,,,-' , t.,-,-:_'..- --- „„ .4.,..-,-7,!.__ , :ris_ , ... . . 1111,4Wallinliki • ,s,„____::, .....211 . .:. .• . . , _ ..._ ----___ -----,--, x...I.! i -- •: . __.i.g ---,-' - -'=-----e.-' __ , ,,, -:•._;• ,. ,,,,7., ,..._,-„, .:____ .„...,v•:- .. „ ----. .--'.___.7.--_-__---...-. ..._ , ....--- , --.,-J ,---.....--ra,,irimormr- r .., _..... ., ,r re -- --- ---__ _ _ _. __ - I'/ii, . . -,...R.,..1....-- • ..,-AL-- - .- -e,m1 I I i - ..-- 1 4-.,_. __._•• __ - elk ,i•''':_ __,..,---- 4' f_40e-- ENT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTM DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA as of September 1,2016; 8:30 a.m. Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative To: Council& Staff From: City Clerk,by direction of City Manager Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings Special Meeting,Friday, September 9,2016; 10 a.m. — 12:30 p.m. (Opening Ceremony: 9:30 a.m.) Spokane Regional Council of Governments. Spokane Co.Fair&Expo Ctr, Conf.Facility,404 N Havana Street Sept 13,2016,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue, Se tt66] Proclamation: Constitution Week 1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2017 Budget Revenues including Prop Tax—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes; resolution setting budget hearing) (5 minutes) 3.Mayoral Appointment: Lodging Tax Advisory Committee —Mayor Higgins (10 minutes) 4. Solid Waste Collection Services RFP Development Update 2—Eric Guth,Erik Lamb,M.Koudelka(60 min) 5. Admin Report: Snow and Ice Removal—Cary Driskell (20 minutes) 6. Admin Report: 2017-202 Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan—Eric Guth (15 minutes) 7. Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 125 minutes] Tuesday,Sept 20,2016 meeting cancelled Wed, Sept 21,2016,Special Meeting- Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue, Sept13] 1. Outside Agency Presentations: Social Service &Economic Dev. Agencies—Chelsie Taylor (—60 mins) 2. Property Tax Revenues—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 3. Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 80 minutes] Sept 27,2016,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue, Sept 20] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Motion Consideration: 2017-2022 Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan—Eric Guth (10 minutes) 3. Admin Report: Aggressive Solicitation Amendments—Erik Lamb,Kristopher Morton (20 minutes) 4. Admin Report: City Manager Presentation of 2017 Preliminary Budget—Mark Calhoun (30 minutes) 5. Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) 6. Info Only: (a)Dept Reports; (b) Ecology Stormwater Grants FY 2018 [*estimated meeting: 70 minutes] Oct 4 2016, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue, Sept 27] 1. Emergency Preparedness—Cary Driskell,Ed Lewis(Dept Emergency Mgmt) (—60 mins) 2. Ecology Stormwater Grants FY 2018—Eric Guth (15 minutes) 3. City Hall Update—Eric Guth (10 minutes) 4. Budget Amendment,2016—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 5. Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 105 minutes] Oct 11,2016,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue, Oct 4] 1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2017 Proposed Budget—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3. First Reading Proposed Ordinance re Property Tax—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 4.Motion Consideration: Fund Allocations to Social Service &Economic Dev Agencies—C.Taylor(25 min) 5. Motion Consideration: Ecology Stormwater Grants FY 2018—Eric Guth (10 minutes) 6. Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) 7. Info Only: (a) Sullivan/Euclid PCC Intersection Project; (b) CenterPlace Catering [*estimated meeting: 65 minutes] Draft Advance Agenda 9/1/2016 8:12:13 AM Page 1 of 3 Oct 18,2016, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue, Oct 11] 1. CenterPlace Catering—Mike Stone (15 minutes) 2. Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: minutes] Oct 25,2016,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue,Oct 18] 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed 2016 Budget Amendment—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance re Property Tax—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 4. First Reading Proposed Ordinance,2016 Budget Amendment—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 5. First Reading Proposed Ordinance Adopting 2017 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 6.Motion Consideration: CenterPlace Catering Contract—Mike Stone (15 minutes) 7. Admin Report: Periodic Review Draft Comp Plan,Planning Comm. Findings—Mike Basinger(45 minutes) 8. Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) 9. Info Only: Department Reports [*estimated meeting: 115 minutes] Nov 1,2016, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue,Oct 25] 1. City Hall Update—Eric Guth (10 minutes) 2. Draft 2017 Fee Resolution—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 3. Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 30 minutes] Nov 8,2016,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue, Nov 1] 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Draft Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations (20 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance,2016 Budget Amendment—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 4. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance Adopting 2017 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 5. First Reading Proposed Ordinance Comp Plan&Dev. Regulations—Mike Basinger (20 minutes) 6.Motion Consideration: Sullivan/Euclid PCC Intersection Project Bid Award—Steve Worley (10 minutes) 7. Admin Report: LTAC Recommendations to Council—Chelsie Taylor (20 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 100 minutes] Nov 15,2016,Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue,Nov 8] 1. Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) Nov 22,2016,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue,Nov 15] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance Comp Plan&Dev. Regulations —Mike Basinger (20 minutes) 3. Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) 4. Info Only: Department Reports [*estimated meeting: 30 minutes] Nov 29,2016—No Meeting— Thanksgiving Holiday Dec 6,2016, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue,Nov 29] 1. City Hall Update—Eric Guth (10 minutes) 2. Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: minutes] Dec 13,2016,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue,Dec 61 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Proposed 2017 Fee Resolution—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 3. Motion Consideration: Funding Allocation,Lodging Tax—Chelsie Taylor (25 minutes) 4. Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 50 minutes] Draft Advance Agenda 9/1/2016 8:12:13 AM Page 2 of 3 Dec 20,2016, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue, Dec 13] 1. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 2. Info Only: Department Reports(normally due for Dec 27 mtg) [*estimated meeting: minutes] Dec 27,2016—No Meeting—Christmas Holiday January 3,2017, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue,Dec 27] 1. Mayoral Appointment: Two Planning Commissioners(3-yr.terms) (5 minutes) 2.Mayoral Appointment: Two Members for Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (1 or 2 yr.terms) (5 minutes) 3.Mayoral Appointment: Councilmembers to Various Board and Committees for 2017 (10 minutes) 4. Advance Agenda [*estimated meeting: minutes] January 10,2017,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue,Jan 3] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: minutes] January 17,2017, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue,Jan 10] 1. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: minutes] January 24,2017,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue,Jan 17] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) 3. Info Only: Department Reports [*estimated meeting: minutes] January 31,2017, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue,Jan 24] 1. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) *time for public or Council comments not included OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: AWC Citizen Action Days(Feb 15-16,2017) District Court False Alarm Program GSI Contract follow-up Library District NLC City Summit(Nov 16-19) SRTMC Interlocal Agreement Term Limits TPP Discussion Undergrounding Draft Advance Agenda 9/1/2016 8:12:13 AM Page 3 of 3 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 6, 2016 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ® information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2017-2022 Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 90.48, Chapter 173-200 WAC, Title 33 U.S.C. 1251-1376; Storm and Surface Water Utility: SVMC 3.80. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Approval 2016-2021 SW CIP June 9, 2015. BACKGROUND: Staff is working on updating the City's 6-year Stormwater Utility Capital Improvement Plan (SW CIP), from last year's 2016-2021 plan to a new 2017-2022 SW CIP. The formulation of a project list is central to the development of the SW CIP. The draft project list reflects public requests for service or improvement, and the identification of needs by staff or management. The projects are prioritized and listed by year based on available local funds, projected grant funding, anticipated grant funding, flood mitigation need, regulatory requirements, opportunity for cost sharing and savings with other community projects, or as a long-term cost savings measure. In this proposed approach, staff would seek to apply for outside funding in upcoming years based on this list. Obtaining outside funding for listed projects leverages and maximizes local funds to allow the City to do more work with the same amount of local funding. If the City did not receive grants in the amounts requested for certain projects, the City could then decide if it wants to proceed with the project with additional local funds or wait on the project to a future date. Staff anticipates bringing a draft 2017-2022 SW CIP containing the draft proejct list, as an admin report to Council at the September 13 meeting and a motion consideration on the September 27 meeting. OPTIONS: n/a. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: n/a BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Impacts include 2017 budget requests and discussion for future budget years in the 402 and 403 funding accounts. STAFF CONTACT: Eric Guth, Public Works Director Art Jenkins, Stormwater Engineer ATTACHMENTS: none