2009, 07-07 Study Session
AGEND.f7l
C.1.~~ ~~OKANE V L'7LL.~`_t~
~~UNCIL YT' ORKSHEET
Sk UDY SESr7IO.lY
TlIeSdiYyy JTldly 7,20'O'9 6.00 p.m.
C.~~Y H.`LLL 1...'O4JNC-EL CHA1M1 BEi~S
11707 East Spi•ague Avenue, Fii•st Floor
(P'lease Silence Yaui- Cell Phon~~ ~uring the Meeting)
DIScUSSIOnr LEADER sUMECTrACTIvITY - GaAL
1. Carl. Otterstroni, STA Spokane Ti•ai7si.# ALLtl~ori.ty Planning Di=scussionIInfonnatuon,.
T~irector of Plan11.:111.c, Cor:rido.r Studies
2. Kathy McClu:ng ULTR.A-.~~x; Ua~ban LODg Term Di.scussioa7[frafoi7nation
Researe}i. A:a-ea .Explara.tQry A~ard.s
Natio:nal Science FaLi:nda.tion
3. Rick VanLcuven; rail Issues Disci.xssionlIn.farrnation
Slaex-iff Knezovi.cEi
4. Scott Kuhta, Ia:n Van Essep7 5ite Selcctor Agreemezit Cliscussi.onll:nfor-maldon
5. Mayor Munson Cou.nci~ Vaca.ncy Procedure I7iscussi~IVIDfarnaation
6. Mayor Munson Advance f1genda Discussianf[:nformatiazi.
Cotanci1iiiembers Courrcil E~xten7a1 CQZn~iiii:ttee R.epor°ts DiscussionlInform atio.ei
Inorn2atian OnIy (wilI not be discussed or rej-?orted): E, a,senier~~~~r Privatc Sewer Liiies
9. Mayo:r Munsoti ~Council Check in Discussiotll.Tnfornatnoiz.
:l (3. M:ifte Jackson City NIana.ger Cammetlts DiscussioiilTrifoarmation
A.Dr~OURN
Note: UjtCess othe¢-►wEse noted abotifc, tlacr•e wi8'1 kae no pul~lic comments :st CounciB Study SesSisans. I~owever, Cuuncil always;
reserves t}ac right tQ request infmrmation fm-oin the public rdnd stafff as appa-e~priate. During meetinbs held by Cfic City of Spokane
Valley Caunc.il, tihe'Cotii«ciIl reserves f:he right t~ take ::action" or,p any item Iistecl or sttbsequent~~ added to the ageiida. The terrnn "action"
meai7s to deEiberate, di~cuss, review, cozisider, evaluate, ar iizcske a coll'ective positive or negaCive cIecisiQn..
NQ"]'IC'E: Iiidividuats planniiig to attend the i-ncct'irig tivhcs require specia.1 assistance fio accommodate yafiysical, hearing, ar oCher irripairments, please .
contact the City Cierk at (509) 92 1 -1000 as soan as possible so that arra€1gements ma3+ be made.
Study Session Agenda, 7uly 7, ,2009 F'age 1of l
I
'
~
anc
~ -
i ~
~
~
~
for a
NetworlK
~
1
ans~
nn
7,
~
J
~
..r~-
i
;
Why Plan.?
Increasing demand for transit
ridershi highest riders~i' since 1
➢ zooS
~ ~ 953
➢Qver 200,ooo rn.ore residents in Spokane
County since 1950s
➢Forecasts indicate between 100?000 tO 250'000
new Spokane County residents by 2030
Environmental ~
)01, Economic and N-eeds
;;;--Transit has clear rale in urban 21st Century
)
d
I
Performance Transit Network
High
. .
➢ Performance as lby riders:
H1
➢ Comprehensive multiple corridors
ervice
➢All-daY, two-wa-y s
➢Reliable
➢Frequent
➢Improved amenities and appeal
➢Competitive Speed
➢Desired connections
~
ewn
i
Network.?
Why a
dispersed nd land use patterns
a
Existing travel ➢ Serve more people than a single c o rridor
➢ History supports networks
➢ Interstate Highway System is a network that
connects the nation's econom
Y
➢VISA-"It's everyWhere you want to be"
➢ Internet proved more popular than Microsoft first
thought; better than software alone
Part of s olutl 'on to making a great region
➢
m N I ' `wA cap
~
~
.
botit "19ki
f~`~~''~ t
Nihat Oak ~ h~
~ IOU ~
~
.
out I
g based ~ C~ ~3~~ ~nd
~
latIs 3 Sat osP~,,~re
ca c~d, ~ t'ind the
e IOU , to
\Nherttie
re you en-01
.
~,th
t'he se~
. ,
~
9 . . a' :..r- .
• : *
,
~
ry .
, r.
i , . 1 4 R _...y .
. . : . ' .
. . . ~
, . ,
~
. i C
~ ~i~ . . ' ~ : . . . . i ' .
. ` 4, . , .1 • „ .
' ~ ~
3 . , y . .
, . .
}
7_
a
. ~ ,
•~"K~,..~ j , ~ q -h '
r-
4.~-
,
.
. ~r
. . , t
. ~ ~
~ 4. ~ I - ~ ~
i
Factors
Demand
);;o- Travel needs
Existing Use Land patterns
)w-N Planned growth
);;;o- Cost of other travel alternatives
i
• Factors of
Attraction (Utility)
➢ Primary
)Oo, Access (where does it go)
➢ Frequency (when does it eome
➢ Speed (how fast)
➢ReliabiIity (is it eonsistent day to day)
➢ Secondary
~ Appea-ing design and features
~ Comfort
~ Safety
p Ease of use
I
Factorsc~ Accommodation (Supply)
)~o Park-and-Ride sta s
parking Seating capacity
ewaiting areas
eroadway and facility space for
transit .
Ve 1cleS
~~Affordable
;
i
Sample Networks
San Francisca
s ,
IIW HwNINr
Propvsed "Rapid
~ #awW
Netwvrk"
0
Improve frequency,
_ ~
sp+eed and relrability
1 ~M ! •
y
k i`~~ !y an 1ines served b
~
■Streetcars
r *
oLi`Jht Rai I
AM~ fN~RN ~ ~ f ~ w
~ ~
"DIeSeL' BuSeS
: .
l
` goo~
t I uTrvlley Buses
Mf~ ~
/K1411~1
r ~
Pwa/rc r
!1. tl(rrfr~. 116*
~F~ r 4
~~cr nnw f~
w~
yM.wxm q~ .
~lx.n yw.r }'i
~ YqhW~ 116fF~ .Y 4
~ iyM PIII~bIM+~N
_ ~
i
Networks
Sampple
i s-bustirrjer . .
- Copenhagen uS
guses„
Regional bus rvutes
with h'rgh firequencY,
~ ~ - .
I+ ~m~ted stops as part
,
r~
af multimadal transit
netwvrk of urban,
~
intercity arrd regional
r..,.w...
.
S@NICe
;
~
~
f R
~ <P movia
~ wrwwr.~.ttxaaw
-
sample tAetNNOfj~s
-
ue~,,,~t
F'~'~'~
,~~~rr~ ' f1,~"~
.
~ 1I an'~ bUs
~
~ ~ith ►
rt~~t~~"~ • ~,c~s~
r~
6,ute serv
t,~~~~ day ~
~ ~ er we~~
dal~ ~
r►
~
I
~ • .
Major Planning Steps
D- -op
. o
orrido
ri g
Plan
Impleme • o
i
• •
Proposed Vision for a High .
Trans*lt Network
Performance
. comprehensive system v public r~h~.r~ STA's transportation ar~d servlces there is a products
that,
k
~re~~ror a hi"gh p
erformance corridors, when taken as a
whole, provide all day, frequent
ar~d lacal mass transit serY i'~e to the
rapid greatest number of people while it helps sustain
e~canor~Y c~ r~c~ ir~prove the
and c~
~f~e regional grow environmental quality of the Inland Northwest.
~
I
• • ~ !
Proposed Guiding Principles
i
i
•
Transit Network
High Per for ance
C
should.
Serve the most number of peoPCe possib-e to the most
.
number of destinations possible.
. Connect the regian's cities and centers as much as possib- e.
Improve the environment and the sustain,ability ofthe
transPortation system.
spc~ nsib-e and scaled apPropriately tc~ t1~e
Be fiscally re
regian's eurrent and ^ ong term needs given cornPeting
demands for scarce resources.
public
I
Develop a Service Typology
'
ns of class' ~ n,g patterns like a
o1vgy ls a mea'
~
menu at a restaurant
Planning tool for identifying opportunities not
previously considered
Potential wa-xy for branding similar services
Means to moving rn ode discussions to a~~ropriate
phase af corridor planning
eed? Access and Frequency are maj' or elements
S
~
for Hi g h Performance Transit Network
~
~
1
~
Proposed Service Typology
Average
Service Average Access Frequency
Type Sp~eed 1nterval Of Service Application
Appropriare in
Green 10 mph 0.25 miCes 6-12 minutes can5trarned urban
1f1- 2 mpll enurrnnmen€ wrfla
Lines high Eaca1 demand
' ApA'roprrate in
Red o. 5- 2 urban carridors
2 0mp h 10 ~ 15 m i nufes with exclusrve or
'
Lines c+,- 3~'p,l ~1Ies semi exclusrrre
rrghts of way
- - - - - _ k 4_
~
; -
I
I
• •
Define Network Corridors
Design principles
➢Multiple destinations on each line
➢Look for opportunities to make better
connections than existing road network
➢Support land use goals and plans of cities and
coun
)OP, . .
Definition process should consider
.
different corridors and combinations
.
before selecting preferred network
~
~
I
Corridors
• • Proioritize
Corridors that offer
➢ Greatest rl 'dershl 'p potential
ortunities
➢Grant o
pp
o
➢ Partnership pp ortunities
➢Econornic Development
);o- t at can e reasonably
Corr'l'dors , .
implemented in the near term
,
.
r
/
~ ChoIces
~
Am i ~ street~rs
~
~ tAotOT Bus
Electric -TxOlteybus
.
~
RapW Streetcars ~~riBuswaY~
~ id Tra~sr ~t (A
.g~~ ~ ~
F -TroIle'~'~'`
, lectri+c F~~i~id
Rail
,
. comrrruter RaiI
~ A., + Hea,,,y Rai1 qwaY/H~''"''~
~ ~ id ~'ra"s. ~t
• res
Regir~~►al E~
r
Sample Mode Choices for Green Lines
~ , ~ ~ ~
~
_ _ _
, , .
~r.~,r. ► r~.n,~
i
~ i y~r r~~~ .d~• ~ I
P P
j
r
~
'I
1 5
3f
I
w n,l
;
i
•i4~ . ' _
~t~
. o
eo ~
_
e Choices
Sample 1f ~w ~
.
~
. , ~
~ ' y • ~
~ . r
i
. • -
„ . .
1 , - - ,:"s __....f•. - °
~ ~ - NI
-
a.
t _
i
~
' it
t , S
a1- "
~
~
' ~ 1._.,.~ ~ . ~ .
sample Mode Choices for Blue Lines
,
~
,
~
,
,
4~'II"~1
Ilt If- ,11 ~ . . ~
I ; e , V
t {1
pp-
t ~
~
i
Outcomes
~ ~ ~ ~ - ,
~
y - -
This is a concept only of what a high perfvrmance transit
network cauld laok like.
- CITY OF SPOKANE V►4LLEY
- Request for ~~uncil Actian
. Meeting Date: July 7, 2009 City Manager Sign-off:
Itert't. Check al1 that apply: 0 consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑public hearing
El Anformation 0 admin. report El pending feg`sfation
~~ENDA fTEM TITLE: ULTRA (Urban Long Term IResearch Area Exiploratary Awards)
GOVERNIi1VG LEG'~SLATICrN; NIAr
RFtEVIOUS +CC]UNCIL ACT[C]N T►4KEN: NDne
B►~CK~ROUND: Representatives form the UnoVerscty mf Idaha and Washington State Universoty
have ap,pr+oac'hed the - city a'bvut agrant t!hey have appCied for regarding the ecnpacts of
urbanizativm mn water qualify and quantify and ~ir quality. They are working with a number af
jurisdictipns arlvng the SpokaneICaeur d'Alene area. The grant will be awarded in fhe faIF. If
successful, the ULTRA tea~m would like cgmmitment fram the Cifiy for staff support to supp[y
existing in°~orrnation, staff and posscbly cgty council saapporfi tm aftend up #0 7 community
stakehalder meetings over a two-year pereod and the possibilify of using city facilities for al'1 or
part oF those meetings. In refurn, the City will be pravided all infarmation data and analysis from
the prvject which rnay be infmrmati+on useful Qn creating policies in the Camprehensive Plan
Updates and otiher city or regconal ,po@icy decisions. Larry Braunen, Associate Vice Presrdent
friom the lJniversity of edaha will be here to make a presenfation and ansvver questians. ,
OPT1ON5: The City of Spokane U'aIley can participate fu6fy, partially or nvt at all in this study-
RECOMMENDE[3 ACTION O~R MC]TION: Council Consensus vn the leve9 0f c4mmitcnent ta
the praposed study, shaurd the grant be awarded far this project..
BLJDGETJFlNANCIAL IMPACTS;
STAFE CC]NTACT: Kathy McClung, Community Development Director
ATT►~CHMENTS fVlA
~
t
~
vices Project,
Detention er
,
i
~
Council o
F~ Governments
f',z
y_'?~''A~~•
, r, ~;,'~an`.'
~ , 3 k ~..f7,:~} I t .,r,.. . .
~ ~ .:r.,. .
_ June, 2009
. .
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
c
~
! ~ *
♦ ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~
~ ~ ~
• ~ ~
! ~
~ .
s
~ ~ ~
~ ~
~r ~
~ ~ ~ ~
i
~
i ~
~ ~
onol~-09'1"C%al H~`i!~to'-
2000
Apprvached the National Institute of Corrections (NIC) for assistance in determining
aur needs for jail expansion. As a resuft, Cunniff recommended fhat we hire a
criminal justice analyst to determine what was driving the demand for adult jail beds in
Spakane Cvunty.
❖ 2002
PowerPaint presentation tv BaCC requesting a Jaif Analysis
;
2003
The Board ofCvunty Commissioners (BOCC) approved the hiring of Lookinglass
Analytics to determine growth trends which drive the demand for adult jail beds. The
analysis anticipated that Spakane Caunty would require an addifiivnal 65 beds per
year until 2015.
❖ Z00►4
The Cvrrectivns Alterriative Review Board (CARB) tv Ivvk at alterriatives tv jail
incarceration.
❖ 2005
Lf, Rvhrscheib, Sgt, Sparber and aon Covn attended thc NIC cvurse, Managing Jail
d'esign and Construction, in Lvngmont Colorado.
The Jail Expansian Team (JET) was fivrmed
Chronologic I Huistory ont
.
2006
Jail Expansion Project gained mamentum, the BoCC authvrized $20,000 for travel in the state vf
Washingtan fvr best practices.
lssued RFQ for Jail Planners and Architec#s
~
2007
Selected Integrus, Dennis Liebert & Assoc, David Bennett, Jim Kalva, CH21VIhill as jail planning
team.
Natianai Institute of Cvrrections (NIC) fechnical assistance trip to Hi(Isbarv FL.
Attended Planning af New Institutions (P4N1) in Denver Cv.
Created Master Schedule toward bond in November, 2008
.
~ zoos
~ Completed EPF, Draft Master plan, an bricks side
Completed "Snaps,haf" data instrument, formed Criminal Justice Committee, Early Case
Resolution (ECR) program, Community Carrections Center Pilot Program, 2411 Pre tria1 Services
vn non-bricks side.
Pastpvned bond to rcduce prvject cos#s
.
2009
Changed design of jail from direct supervisivn to in-direct supervisivn
Explored Private Cvrrections
Reduced praject costs vf operational & canstruction
Explared partnering with SPD for new police station and relacation of CCC in Public Safety
Buifding
Evaluating the comparative cost between a horizvntal V.S. verfiical jail
I
+ , I
• Time Schedule
Original
RX3k2w S kane Coanty • Detentlon Facifit~rr Planning and Cvnstmcfion Tim Une ~
2M7 2008 2009 201 a 20+, 2012 2D13
~ iVtIJFM MJJASQNDJFMA JJAS NDJF JJ 30NDJF A JJAS JF 1J ' J JJ J J1 S
~
. f
.
..,i - I
3 Cetlrar AFfl MoI A'IlNoti
,i k
4 , -JL
II ~ , ~ fi! ! i~ {
4 %)6k 4bbm' FL
3 Wue Ondl RFQ !oT rorfw ' - • - ~ - - ~ ~ J._. ~ , ; i , ~ ~ _
, e POm Nm Nbqtb ~ I _ ' . ; ~ I ' ~ ~ •
~ ~ra and fte Delenft Plowo RFQ
~ e Se(ed l~tii 0rf(Anw(5bI"apte) "
i I~on ~mi~ ~
I~a Re~
~ttRe**Rnm SeW &FNre,fd PtnW I -f ' ~ ; V I II i I I I ; l
.
12 IdWM Pm and aig pie.
. ~
.
- ~
~
~
~
Proma~on
lss~►e a~► r
13.Pu6k ~euatlair8~nd ~
;
14 G6N1lId 0W40m Owd 16m I JJ ~ - - - ~ - ' + ~
r _ _...t.. , ,
. i . - _..F,.. .
; _ . .
! I ~ _ . I
,
,
:
_ _I -j ~ L,_ T - ' - ~ - I~ =L _ .
,
~
_ F--
~
' 1 IsEI~ ~FQ kX AI~ SBfYIn - _ _
~ ' . . _ , , . . . _ ;
, . 1 {
y .,z.__~..f .f _ ~ ;
~ 2 R ect~re ~ .
,
3 51~ a ~le F~'d~IDereR ~ ~
~
~ ~ • doam~ : ~ , ! , ~ ~
Doisenbi (4zmcr~} i , I ~ . ;
, I
._~a I ! ;I
~
~ s Ca~tlo n Ca~d A~wrd I
i
7 (24 I I , ~
.r
Ta~m 5G~lf r
,
I rrar~ reffrs~r
I-~- -
H. ~ ' • I ~
1 ~
~-r-
,
. , . ~
• - -
Purpose and Need s Summary
~~e Jai was bui t for a 472 inmate capacity- now housing 675 but
overcrvwded at 600 - the popu atian has peaks af near y 710
The current faci ity was overcrowded within 10 years vf being bui t
1986
4• To contra popu ativn, imitations are p aced on booking affenses, sv
.
crimina s go ree
I~ ttakes SCJ &Geiger to manage vur inmate popu afiion of 1178
Geiger is aging faci ity and was designed as a work
re easelprograms faci ity, now housing vur medium inmate
popu ation
The airport has requested that Geiger be c osed by 2013, we need
to find housing for 400 to 600 inmates currenty housed there
The Spokane County Jai has be Gited for numerous A►DA viv ations
arrd renvvations wi be necessary but can be satisfied in a new
faci ity
i
i`yni }
• 'I ~ i1
Purpose and Needs Summary Cont.
l
- t:• [nappropriate use of the design of the current facility. Tnis increases
secudty and rnanagement prvblems because of poor line of sight '
issues.
i
•:4 The demagraphics of the offender is changing to more serivus offenses, with 15-26% gang pvpulativn be hvused at the jail and 10 -
15°fo haused at Geiger. ;
According to the Lovking Glass Study and Bennett, vur inmate
papulation is grawing between 40 to 65 beds per year depending on ~
~ length of stay
❖ The jail vperates 365 days a year, 24 hours a day, making it vne of
' the mvst staff-intensive functions of the Ivcai government and
resulting in a high level ofwear vn the facility and its equipment,
fixtures, and furnishings.
.
I I
.
Facmilmity Development Process.
r
I
. I
Architectural Design
717~~' Construction
Site Selectio . & Plannin ~
_ t~ - hases
5 Ma~ te s
~6 S
;
_ Occupancy
~
K.
Pre-arc itectural lannin
h Best case scenario = 26 months
~ Normal case scenario = 52 months
~1~
David Ben--nett'8 R~.
Callectin Data -Creation of Snapshot and Trend Dat~
2114108 Symposium
Established Criminal Justice Committee
24~7 PI"L'-TrIal SeI"VICeS
Established Early Case Resolution
. ,
Began pilvt Cvmmunity Cvrrections Center
Building Risk Assessment Tvals tor CCC &Pre-Trial
~
Criminal iulsti,ce Counci~l~
, i
❖ Superior Court Judge - Maryann Moreno (Chair)
❖ District Court Judge Richard White
City Court Judge -Mary Logan
❖ City Probation - Donna McBride
County Commissioner - Mark Richard
❖ Mayor Munson - City vf Spokane Va e
Y
❖ Mayor Verner - City ofSpokane
I= ,
Sheriff Ozzie Knezovich
Jai Commander -Jvhn McGrath
Pre-Tria Services - Chery Tofsrud
Detention Services Project Mgr. -Michae Sparber
Ti,m-,e t.o Disposi'~tton
'MM
inc~icat~ed an averageof 4.5
~he data appearances (touches) occurred between
0
arraignment to disposition in Superior Court
•'••EarlY Case Resolution is designed to minimized
I
this figure both vr~ the frvnt an+d k~ack end of the
process
w
I
I y,
j:~r•
'•M^y:.
I~
II
ECR began tn Aprif 1 at", 2049
Cases Completed =141 (one tvuch instead 4 on average 2007)
Ongoing cases = 37
.
Of the compieted cases
87 in 30 days ar less
❖ 54 in 31 + days. (Working toward shvrting the length af stays)
s y.
I
. Community Corrections Pi'lot Program
-
Pilot Program Focused on:
1. IOP Drug I Alcoho- ~reatment
2. MR""'m training
3. Community Re-entry
~ 4. Work Search
" 5. Responsib e Renters Program
' 6. Housing
Mana.qed by: t. Aarvr~ Andertar~ 1~Geiger ,
~
CO.PW
■
~
~
t
~
~
• ~
t d, ~
~
~
~ bave
1
a~►
.0mpleted p
~ ~1 heal~'~ '~o~r~
k~
.
MR
. ed nt
. a me
A bave omplet
nts Ih
1~► . e
~
2 are ~ ~ sing-
09 ID ol bou
. ~
~o~
~
t~
~,~d , ~~r~~
5 are tawing
► ~
~
~
~ e
S 4
.
~ 0ju'n
d~►~
~
Gr
~ ~
. ~
June 22nd
i1
~
~
t4e)
~ Predict'ii,,ons
lnm,ate Opening.. 2013
0 1,419 secure
o 200 CCC beds
a ~ata 1,619 Beds
;
By 2035
o 1,783 SeCU re
o 250 CCC beds
,
,
o Tota 2,033 beds
a •
Potential Inmate ■op • o
Outstanding Municipa Outstanding District
Warrants Warrants
47462 57067
10,977 Total
; Outstanding Superior US Marsha Pre-
Ad'udicated
Fe vnJI Warrants .
19248 Popu-ation
200
AM=
09tion of 09tion 2
,
-
S kanc Caun Campus Site OPtiD11 A _ r~
_ Ska~e Coevty~ Daket~ fiwEllly CsmpwwNw J~Ne Crb
~po{cane Conn#y Campas +Conceptua1 Sectian
Ez»png M New JaN Tc+wet (6 Lew*)
C~ I mrm
4a mm L
F~!un F~~cm ~+MM4
r56 ' ~ mAE06
L E*63 Cft ~ I ~e~ei li~'~p • -1
EW" Caft--
zmi
~ir.rw Fi*LfYr ~ . ~ ~
ft" Bm+wa ~ w6:sm~ rSL
i
~"kane County Campus Conceptaal Pfan
~
~
i vwAwmft "
pa"tw~o~~MILO 0( NM At,TO*VI
~ ?
9paWir
spep~r Ca~M ca~r,aJw Me eLE►tFiB Wuc
~ i ~ ;
_ C&MIftFrTY W ce~ ro i ~
GORRt 1...... ~
V
~#p~'fA10 JAiI
9AFtTY Bl.m
Aer~r
wMl,w cgo* NwTewtlw 4RAM
oEarrm t+u F Hwd cwft 1 cORMNOFw 4a ears
i ~ ~ ~
e coM eaWczKM u,ara in Pe minly rMW4 m em
TO"GL 1T12 lED6
0 WINJA1.110W 3 Aldlia+d IiewMiO Uf& Tap'Fieer m AEb6
I°~A~n1~aY~~+N~bor
T4TAC dlAl6Off CQACITY tAE M06
a '
Rural Site 44e Ac.•~ Uption E
SpsknK Com1v Iktc"NdmA Rtefly Ce"*ffelhe wk Cmh
Spokane Codnty Campas Conccptnal 5ection
E*" Jai New M E*wtslorti lA#dMon (1 UwW)
eM4 C*
:..'~ca
U" FW UwW ~ -
Raral Site Conceptual Plan
FGl~n 6~~faa
~ 0~
~
❑
+N C0rt+
~ ~ SUP~O c INO
RutatLtrto6pi Luwhhy O F6-14" fm
a~oaooao~aa~[~~~~t~~~ oa~oaaa c~xx
. ~~~~~I Chrx ~
a a
~a
u~ut 9fu sN
1r~+ ❑ a
~
!&Pam" Cotor C++nv+w. rt..woM biOM JW Md P~ar
NAw JON C"* IddAbnbrE,pr~d~dlneMYg
A EfA6TIME3JAlL-CdunNlCrnpN F.~840111lOwn1biK 462 sm
• K!W JAR • Rrd'dM AiM1cN f ftMnip'nwt NrwMq 2D6 dED6
0 MM JAR •fivr191M Ndrig T!1 lfUS
p NEW JAL • Fww Ybwiq Heirwp 316 6EOfi
a CGiI. CQRVCTINrM6 lrowd N Ilril 3Ai SM dlD6
1dTk tNA A6D6
~
auesfjot4s?
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY _
. , Request for Council Act'iQn
Meeting Qate: JUIy 7, 2009 City Manager Sign-W
I#:eI'Yl: Gheck all that apply: El Consent 0Old business El New business ~ Pub[ic Hearing
El lnfarmatEan ~ Admin. Report 0 Pending Legislafivn
AGENDA ITEM TlTL€: Spakane Regional Site Selector Update -Agreement fo partiGipate as
member af Site Selector Cansortiurn.
GOVERNIN'G LEGISLATION: N'!A
PREVIVUS COUNCIiL ACTION T►4KENp City Counci0 provided funding for the Sife Selector
web site in 2009.
6ACKGRC)UND: See atfached memo.
OPTIONS: See attached rr~emn.
,RECC]MMENDE[3 AC_ TION OR MOTION: Prauide direction to staff. BUOGET1FINANCIAL IMP►4CT5: Gvuncil allncated $16,500 in the 2009 budget to the
Regiona[ Site Selector pr~jipct.
STAFF CONT►ACT: ScQtt Kuhta, SeniQr Planner
~CA`~' C~~' _ fie '
V11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 El Spokane Walfey WA 99206
509:921.1000 0 Fax: 509.921.1008 ❑ cityhall@spokanevalley.org
.
Memorandum .
To: David Mercier, City Managerp Gety ~ouncil
From: Scott Kuhta, Senior Planner .
GC: Kathy NicClunga C❑ Director; NIike Jacksan, Deputy City Manager
Date: July 7, 2009 Re; ~Regional Siite Selector Agreement
BAC.KGROUND
The Spokane Regional Site Selectvr web sife is an econornic deuelopmenf tool that.
prouides awealth of informatAon far anyorre interested srr researchong camcnerciall
property for saPe or lease in the Spokane region. The web site aIiPaws users to view
property sistcngs, generate ecanomic and census reportsr provides data on cQmpetitave
_ businesses and vncludes interactive maps that display gevgraphic infor mation such as
the location of stireets, wateir bodies, parks and other points of interest.
In fhe fall of 2007, Spokane ValTey sigr~~d an agreement to parficipate as a member of
the Spokane Regional Site 5elecfar Consartiurrw, which uncludes Spokane County, the
City of Spakane, Liberty Lake, Avista and Greater Spokane Inc. The Ca~~ortium is
working on adding more citfes which will resiult 6n evwer costs for all members. The
vrAginal agreement terrriinated on Deee~~er 31, 2008, but was extended by all parties
unti9 August 2009. The Cansor#ium members are wvrking an a new, mare permanent
agreemenfi that will renew annually upan approuaf vf the Spokane Regronal Site
5elector Consor-tium Oveirsight +Committee, provided that sufficient funding is secured to
keep it ~running foc° th~e 'next year.
The Site Selector agreerraent sets.fvrth #he respansibilities nf fhe Consortium members
and esfabTishes the financial commitrraent of each member. It specifies that members
are eifher "PubCic" or "private " enfities. lin order tfl host 9and managerrrent iinfarmation on
the Site Selector vveb site the agreement startes that "an agency must be a member of
the Consartium." This Agreement is with WSU Spokane and is apPraved by all
participating organizateans. fn turn, V115U-SpQkane adrninis#ers acQntract with GIS
Planning, the cantracfor responsi~le for the Si#e Selector web site.
f~~SUE.
In November 2008, the 5ite Selector Consartium vuas %nformed that they waufd be
_ considered an "ou#side agency„ for budgetary purposes -during Spokane UaIIey's 2009
; budget preparations and hearings. During budget hearings, ConsQrtium members
preserrted a request for funding alvng wifh other vutsid'e agencies. City Council decided
to cvntribufe $16,500 tv cantinue funding 56te Sedectvr in 2009,
Treating the Consortium a$ an vutsade agency has c_ reated acanflict that calfs for
Councif directrvn. Qutside agencies are required to sign a contraGt wifh the City as a
cmndition v~ fund'ing. If the City continues fo treat the Consortium as an vutside agency
#hen the City should require the same cvntract consistent with alI other outs7de
a~encies. Further, fhe City shou[d not segn ar~ agreem ' ent to parkicipate as _a m+eimber of
the Consortium. This, however, would GauSe significant prvblemS. The current
agreement does nvt inelude a pravision tv contract separately with an agency that wants
°ta ,participate financialfy but does nat vuant to be a mernber nf the Cansvrtium.
As amember of the Consortium the City has a direcf say in haw decisions are ma+de and
hovv maney is spent. This is the mvst obviaus difference when cvmpared tv Qutside
agerrcies vuhere the City has no say in prpgrarru or budgetary matters. If the City
disag~~~s with decisions of the autside agency, thenu the Cety has the optuon tv not
prouide funding the next tirne araund. In the case vf Sufe Selector, Cdty staff participat~s
on the Consortium Oversight Committee and directly parficipates rn all decisions.
Wifhin the lasf couple of marrfhs staff had direc# input into how several thousa-nd dvBlars
would be cut frarra fhe prvpased 2009-2010 Siite 5elecfar budget, the result of which wilC
reduce Spokane IIaIIey's con#ributivn by 25°IQ. Staff assists the Consortium in making
decisians on datasets thafi are inc7uded in the 5ite Selector da#abase. Recently, staff
Frelped promvte the creation and inclusion infv the Sste Selector web applicativn a new , .
layer thaf highlights Inaustrial Parks, the majarity of which reside within 5pokane VaIIey, -
Co nsvrtiram mem'bers afsv h~ve a+direct say as ta vvhich brokerlse!Ilers of real estate
data is included within the site selectvr sy►stem. Fvr example, the Consortium decided to
arlvw FSBQ (fvr sale by mwner) fistings on the web site. To make this happen,
Consortium members actlualCy uploa+d the sales informatoan %nto the web appAicatavn. If
Spokane 1r'alley decides to withdcaw farm #he CQnsork6urn, FSBO Bistings in Spakane
VaIley may nv# get visibility on the Site Selectvr web site (unless anather Consortium
member decides fo fake on thc respnnsibility far Spvkane Va11ey).
COUNCIL QIRECTION
Staff seeks Council directivn with regard to cantinued participativn wrth the 'R+egional
Site Serector program. Optivns are as fallows:
1. Authorize City M'anager to sig~n new multi-yeair agreement to contsnue participateon
as aRegional Site SeIectvr Consortium member. Appriave fundang alevcativn during
ann_ual budget process, 2. Requi re Co nsortium. to present fund i n g request as an aufside agency, S pvkane
Valfey vuvuCd not participate as a member of the Gansortium.
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
- Requ~~~ for Council Action
Me+eting Date: July 7, 2009 City Manager Sign-Qff:
ltem: Ch+eck all that apply. ~J corasent ~ old business ❑ new business public hearing
~ iraformation 0 admin. report E] pending Iegislatian 0 other
AGENDA ITEM T!TLE: Council Vacancy
GOVERNING L~GISLATION: RCW 35A. 13.020, RCW 42. 12.070
BAGKCSROLJND: As a result of Cauncilmember Taylor accepting a staff position with the City flf
Connell, Washingtan, Cauncil:member Taylor provided notice tQ Council an Jume 16, 2009, that he would
be vacating his office effectiVe midnight June 30, 2009. Staff has drafked a pasitian vacancy
annvuncement vvhich wi11 be pubiished for several weeks x:n b❑tla the VaIIey News Herald and the
Spokesman Review, will be on the City's we6site, and will be distrpbuted via our Public Inforrrratian
C3ff cer's nortnal distribution list. Applications w'ril be a.vailable from the City Clerk, or can be found on
the City's webpage.
The tnruuosecl s+chedule is as folZaws:
June 19, 26, Tuly 3, and 10, 2009: PrablicatiQn af the notice of vacancy
Juty 17, 2009, 4:U0 p.m. ApplicatiQns must be received by the +City Cterk
July 21, 2009, 5:00 p.m. Executive Sessian ta review applicatiDns
A. rulV 21. 2009: 6:00 mm. Determine list af those aDnlrcarits to interview (anen sessiam)
Note: Council will need to determine the process for deciding wha to interuiew; or perhaps if
there are a minimum number o~ applicants (such as 7 or Iess), tQ interview everyane; all vf which
is Council's pxeference, Council may a1sv want ta consider whether to have a set list of questions
for the interview, and if sa, vvhat questions vvould be used.
B. JulV 28. 2009: 6.00 n.m. Interviews of selected aoolicants (in anen session)
Note: Council may want to consider the process here a1sa, to interview applicants alphabetically,
or by anvther rnethad.
August 4, 2009, 5:00 p.m. Executive Sessian to d:iscuss applicant interviews
C. August 4. 2009: 6:00 D.M. Regular studv se5sion: aDnotntmenti of aonlicant (otaen sessinn).
Some optians to consider far the Hugust 4open session ta make the actual appointment include
1. rraaking nominations, with ar without a required second: then vating on the nominatioras with the
candidate receiving the most vates as the new councilm~ember
2. makii7g a mation with a t'equired second, for ane candidate with a majority Vote required ta appaint.
3. if the first Fnation fails, tnaking a motiora with a required second, far a different candida~e wrth a.
anajority vote required to appaint; and sa on until a majorzty vote is obtained.
. 4. other options at council discretion
The law does not indicate whether a majority ar plurality Vote is su~'ficient, nor daes it explain the exact
pracess of appointment. Rather, it is a decisiQn the Council should make before sfarting an appaintment
z process. MRSC Staff member Jixn Doherty stated that a1thQUgh the RCW's statutory language does nat
indicate whether a majority Dr plurality vate is sufficiezat for appointing a persan to the Council, the best
advice far a city council that must fill a va.cancy is to establish the ground rules beforehand. Blaek's
Lcxw Dictionary def nes plurality as "fihe greatest number (esp. of votes), regardless of whether it is a
simple ar an absolute majority," This means that if there are three or mQre candidates and one candidate
has mare vates than any vther, that candidate has the plural majority of the votes.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Position Vacancy Annvuncement
2. Application farrn
COLTNCIIs MEN.BER POSITION VACANCY
The Spokane Valley Ci°ty Council 'rs accepting appiications from individuals interested xn serving as an interim
Councilmember to fi1l tne vacancy of City Council Position Z. The person appointed ta this interrm position will
serve fram the date of appo'tMtment umtil the person elected in the Navember 2009 gerreral election takes office an.
November 24, 2009, which is the date the eleetian a-esuYts are expected tQ be certified. State law reouires that a
councilmembea- be a resident of Swokane Vallev fvr at leas# avear prior tu aiDpoantmenf, and he a re2istered
yoter at the time of aiDulicaEion. Cvuncil positions are at-large pQSitions.
The E;ity of Spokane Valley is a non-chartear code city, aperates under a ccruncil-managcr farrn of gorrernment, and
is gvverned uncler the optionai municipal code of the RevBSed Cade of Washington (RCW) Title 35A. T_Jrader this
fQrm of gavernment, 1egislative authority is concentr-ated in the elected City Council, which h:ires a profiessianal
administratar, a City Manager, to imple,ment policies. T'he Council is eomprised of seven mernbers, all of wham
haue an equal vate, with the MayQr chosen every tvva years fram among fel1aw CouneiImembers. As the legislative
body, the City Cauncil establishes IQCaI laws and policies, and has general oversight and contrcal over the City's
finances, primarily through the budget process. Regular Cvuncil meetings are held the second and fQUrth Tuesdays
at 6:00 p.m., and iCauncil study sessians are generally held the f:xst, third, and acGasiQnally the fifth Tuesdays at
6:40 p.m.
Submittal wrocess: A..pplications must be recei~ed hy the City Clerk no later than 4:00 p.m. Friaay, July 17, 2009.
Late arrividg anail will not be accepted. Appli.cations may be hand-deIivered or mailed ta: Chris Bainbridge, City
Clerk, Spokane Valley City Hall, ] 1707 E. Sprague Avenue, 5uite 106, Spakane Valley, Washington, 99206.
Question.s may be directed to Chris Bainbridge, Spokarae Valley City Clerk, 509-688-0177, or e-mailed to
cbainbrid~4ea,spokaneVallev.orsz. Please do not e-maxl your application. Applications can be found on the city's
vvebsite at w~vw.spQka.nevallev.or2; or by calling the City C1erk's o~fice. Tnterviews are tentatively scheduled for
the evening of July 28. Selected applicants w311 be noti .fied of the exact date and time of the interview once all
appiicatians have been received. The formal appaintment is tentatively set for the August 4 Council Stu:dy Session.
Meeting
e ,
Vailey ~
+CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
11707 E. 5prague Avenue, Suite 106
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
(509) 921-1 000
ApPLaCATION FaR cITY COvNcIL MEn~~ER POsITIoN # 2
Thank you for your interest in serving the Spokane Valley community as a member of the Spakane Valley Cit-y
Cauncil. Tm be cvnsidered, applications must be completed, signed, and received at the City C1erk's ❑ffice, 11707
E. 5prague Avenue, 5uite 106, na later than 4:00 p.rn. Friday, July 17, 2009, (late arriviag mail will nat be
accepted). A.pplicatiQns may be hand-delivered or ma'rled.
Name:
(Last) (MiddIe) (First)
Complete Home Mailing Address:
If you have lived at your current address less than one year, please lis# your previaus addresses and state haw long
you lived at those residences.
Cornplete Prewaous Address Lengfh of'Fime at this Address
Home Phane: { ) Fax:
. ,
Business Phane: Cell:
E-imail:
Occupation: (if retired, please indicate former c►ccupation)
Business Address:
Educatianal Background:
1. Registered voter in the City of Spokane Valley? Yes [ ] No [ ]
2. Have you continuously resided within the city lirnits of the City of Spokane Valiey for a year or more? (5tate
law requires acouncilmernber to be a resident Qf Spokane Valley far at least a year prior #o appointment, and to be
a registered voter at the time of application.) Yes [ ] Na [ ]
3. Haue you ever been convicted for anything ather than a rninor traffic uivlatian? Yes No C ]
4. If yvu answered "YES" to #3 above, please explain:
5. 17o you or your spouse or any irnmediate family mernber (spouse, children, sibl'rngs, parents) have a f nancial.
intexest in, or are you an employee or officer of any business oar agency which does business with the City of
Spokane Valley? YE5 [ ] NO Tf yes, please explain:
6. Is any member of yauc immediate family currently employed, either full tirne ❑r part time, by the City of
Spokane Va11ey, or currently perforrn any volunteer work for the City of SpQkane Valley? YES NO
If yes, please explain:
7, Wo u ld yau r appaintrnent create a confl ict of interest ar aa~ appearance of a co nflict of interest? YE S Nt3[ ]
IT yes, please explain:
8. P1ease list yaur employme~t far the past ten years:
NAME OF EMPL(]~R P(]SrTTON ItELD DATES OF EMPLOYMENT
9. Please list the prQfessional affiliatioiis, c1ubs, socia1, ar frater:nal arganizatians to whieh yau belong or hQld
o f'f, ce;
14. Please list your speci,al ski1ls and1or interests:
11. Please list your valunteer experIlence, and include any vaYunteer ❑r paid positions he1d on any governmenfial
baard, co.m:mittee ar coanrrrissian:
FRL7M. TO:
FR(]M: TO:
FROM: T'O:
FROM: TO :
12. Why are you interested in serving in. this interlrrh position as a Spaka,ne Va1ley City Councilmernber?
~
13. 'V4What are the three highest privrities you believe the City need~ to address? How vvauld you prQpasc t:o address
theseissues? -
.
14. Have you ever atte~~ed a meeting of th.e Spakane Valley City Cou:ncil? YES[ a N'~
If yes, give an estirna~~ of haw many meetings you hav~ attended i:n the past year:
15. Appointment to the City Council wi[I requize your attendance at numerous regularly scheduled and special
meetings, which generally accur on Tuesday evenings. Council:members are a15o expected ta representi the C'►ty of
SpQkane Valley by serving an various regiona:1 camm.issians, committees and boards. Are yQU able to commit your
tdme and energy to participate ful1y as a merrYber of the Spokane Valley City CouncaL YE5 NO
16. Refierences: Please l.ist name, address and phone number:
1.
2.
3.
Once submitted, applicatians and related materials becQme a putal'ic record suhjeet to public disclosure, and wi11
appeax in the Counci:l agenda packet fvr the August 4, 2009 City Cauncil study session meeting. Interviews are
tentatively scheduled for the evening of July 2$. Selected applicants will be natified of the exact date and tiane of
the anterview once al:l applicatiQns have been received. Final action appoxnting a candidate to elective office will
take place in the apen pu:blic meeting, vvhich is,anticipated to c~~cur August 4, 2009. Na City elected afficer sha11.
hold any a~~er off ce or employmer~t withi:n the 5pakane Valley City govermnent.
Signature: Tociay's Date: ~
DRAFT
ADVANCE AGENDA
Far Planrung Discussion Furposes Only
as af July 3, 2009; 8:44 a.m.
Flease note this is a work in progess; items are tentative
T'a: Council & Staff
From: City Manager
Re: Dra.ft Schedule for Upcoming Council TVleetings
Julv 14,2009, Regular Meeting,, 6.40 p.m. [due date Moaday, July 6]
1. Consent Agenda: Payroll, Claims, Minutes [5 minutes]
2. First Reading Proposed Ordinance False .Alaxm - R.ick Va.nLeuven [10 minutes]
3. Proposed RESOIution Declaring Itenas Surplus - Ken Thompson [10 minutes]
4.Motivn Cansideration: Brvadway Rehab Phase 2 Bid Award - Neil KerstenlSteve Worley [10 minutes]
5. Motion Consideration: Wastewater Treatment Plant Interlocal Agreement - Mike Cvnnelly [15 minutes]
6.1Vlotio❑ Gansideration: Private Sewer Easement -Neil Kersten [10 minutes]
7. Mvtian Consideration: Shflreline Inyentary Contract - Kathy McClung [20 minutes]
Admin Report: Fanhandling Ordinance Cary Driskell [20 minutes]
EXECUTNE SESSIUN: Land Acquisition [*estimated meeting: 100 minu#es]
Julv 21, 2009, 5tudv Sessivn, G:aU p.m. [due date Monday, July 131
1. Council Cansensus fvr Draft Legislative Agencia and 2010 Council Goals - Mayor Munsvn (20 minutes)
2. Cam Plan Quarterl U date - Greg McCormick 15 minutes
.
;
m
4. Governance 1Vlanual Changes - Mike Connelly, and committee members (30 rninutes)
5. US Census Bureau 20 10 Census - Duane Waikan (15 minutes)
6. Council External Committee Reports - Counciimembers (15 minutes)
[Total Meeting; 115 minutes]
Tfrur, Julv 23. 21I09; 3-5a.m. Joint CauncilJSnakane Citv Mte; S,nakane Citv Council Brferine Certter
Tentcrtive agenda items rrtclude: waste water challenges; rnunicipa°I caurt ehallenges,• regional transportatran
plcxnning/solutrons; crnd GMA policies and implementation,r,,
Julv 28, 2009, Regular Meering 6:00 p.m. [due da#e Monday, July 2{}1
1. Cvnsent Agenda: Payroll, Claims, Minutes [5 minutes]
2. First Reading Proposed 4rdinance re Development Agreement (CPA 0I-09) - Mike Connelly [15 minutes]
3. Mation +Consideration: OFD Grant Authori , Cammuni Re-Licensia -Cary Driskell 10 mtnuets]
lz~~ s
5. Admin Report: Winter Raad Maintenance - Neii Kersten [30 minutes]
6. Info Only: Department Reports [*estimated meeting: 120 minutes]
Au Y ~i~ : _ .
3rist~,~. 2009, 5p0Q>).rr~~:~~'~,ecu~~4=on: I3iscxiss C6fin'cil - )plicani: int+e=iews
A- Pg~~~t ~?009, Sturlti Sesszon, 600 p.m _ due date Monday, July 27
tion ite°~~ ~'~~7~~ointr~ieiit: ~`d'6iici1
August 11. 2009, Regular Meetiaer, 6;00 p.m. [due date 1Vlonday, August 31
1, PUBLI+C HEARiNG: 2010 Budget Hearing -Ken Thampsvn [10 minutes]
2. YiTSLIC HEARIlYG: Cable Franchise - Nivrgan Koudelka [10 minutes]
3. Consetit ,~-~ilcla; Pa~-roll, Clai►iis, I~~itliites [5 iiiinutes]
4. SeGOild Rt;adEIIcTx`opCISed:OCd ltitttlce I"e Develc+prneiit A'areem~.~tar (CPA' 0 I-09) --Mike +Coriiielty [10 minutes]
EXECUTIVE SESSx+QN: L.abox• Negvtiations Nstimated meeting: minutes] ,
Draft Advance Agenda 712/2009 8:05:44 AM Page I of 3
AuLyust 18. 2009, Skudv Session. 6:00 p.m. [due date Monday, August 101
Act~on Item:
1. Mation Consideration: SettFng P~~lic Hearings 5ept $ and 22 - Ken ThampsQn (5 _minutes)
2. MQtion Cansideratian: Winter R.Qa:d NTaintenance - TVeil Kersten {15 minutes} ~eLyular Studv Sessian Ztems:
3. ResidentiaI Lighting -Kathy IVTcClu:n.g (20 minutes)
4. PTanrLed AGtion C)rdinance (SET'A) - Cireg Ilr[cCorrraick • (20 minutes)
5. Bat:ch Code Amendrraents Report - Karen Kendal.1 (20 minutes)
b. Pandemic Respanse Flan - Mike Jacksan (30 minutes)
7. Council Exfemal CQmmittee Reports - Councilt~embers (IQ minutes)
[Tatal Meeting; 120 minutes]
A u2ust 2 5, 2 0 0 9, Reau 1ar MeetinLy 6:00 p.m. ~due dafe NIo~nday, August 171
1. Cansenfi Agenda: Payra11? Cla2ms, Minutes [5 minutes]
2, Admin Report: Qutside Agencies Presentatian [45 minutes]
3. In.fo Ora ly: Department Reports [*estimated meeting: 50 minutes]
Seiitember 1. 2009, Studra Sessimn, 6:00 a.m. [due +dafie Mvnday, August 24]
1, Federal Delegatpon Reports - Mayor Munso:n [50 mPnutes]
2. Caun.cii Exteraa.al Carn:mittee Reports - Councilrnernbers [15 minutes]
[Tvtal Meeting: minvtes]
September 8, 2009, Regular Meetine, 6.00 p.m. (due date Monday, August :31] :
1. BUDGET HEARING: 2010 Budget - Ken `I'ho:rn~pson [10 minures]
2. Consent Agenda: PayroXr, Claims, 1N.[i:nutes . [5 mirlutes]
3. Second Readirag Froposed Oxdinance Farse Alarm - Rick VanLeuven [10 minutes]
4. Mation Consideratian. Qutside Agenc.ies Funding Allocations - K,en ThQmpson [15 minutes]
5, Infa Only: Aquatics Contract - Mike Stone
6. Infa Only: Park Main.tenance Contract - Mike Ston.e . [*estirnated meeting: minutes]
Sep~~~~er 15. 2049. Studv Session, 6;00 a.m. [due date MondaY, Sep~t 71
1. Aquatics Cantract - Mike Stone (15 minutes)
2. Park Maintenance Contract - Mike Stone (15 minutes)
3. Fall Batch Cade Amendments (inelud.es `4ss. Dwe11.i~g Units & Qrd 08-006)- K,athy McClung (20 minutes)
4. Cauncil Extemal Committee Reports - CauncFlrnembers (I 5 mIlnutes)
[Tota1 Meeting: 55 minutes]
September 22 2009, Reeular NxeetinLy 6:00 p.m. [due date Manday, Sept 14[
1. BL~~ET REAMIlNG: 2 0 10 B udget - Ken Thomps nn [10 minutes]
. 2. Consent Agenda: Payroll, Claims, M'mutes [5 minutes]
3. Motion Consideration: Aquatzcs Contr-act - Mxke Stane [10 minutes]
4. Motzon Considerati.on: Park Mazntenance Contract - Make Stane [10 minutes] -
5. Infv Only; Department Reports [*estimated rraeeting: minutes] . :
Draft Advara.ce Agenda 7f2f2009 8;05:44 AM . Pace 2 of 3
September 29, 2009, Studv Session, 6:00 p.m. [due date Monday, Sept 211
.1. Council External Committee Reports - Councilmembers
October 6, 2009, Studv Session, 6:00 p.m. [due date Monday, Sept 281
1. Council External Committee Reports - Councilmembers
October 13,'2009, ReLyular 1VleetinLy, 6:00 n.m. [due date Monday, Oct 5]
October 20, 2009, Studv Session, 6:00 p.m. [due date Monday,.Oct 121
OTHER PENIDING AND/OR YTPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS:
ADA Plan
Affordable Housing Participation
Alternative Analysis (contracts)
Budget Ordinances: Prop taac; tax confirm; budget City Center Report to Council City Hall Sales Purchase Agreement
Comp Plan Qrtrly Update (Oct, Jan, April, July)
Concurrency
Congress of Cities (NLC) Nov 10-14, San Antonio
Contracts - 7-year renewals (pros/cons)
Court Services Alternative Analysis
East Gateway Monument Structure #
Fee Resolution - Oct 27
Hearing Examiner Ordinance Amendment (Planning Commission)
Impact Fee Request Central Valley School District
Lexipol Policies - Police Dept Lodging Tax Northeast Housing Solutions City Membership #
Overweight/over size vehicle ordinance (2009)
Small Works Roster
Stimulus, Phase 2
Strategic Transp. Financial Plan - Dave Mercier
. Street Standards (and UDC Title 42)
TPA Interlocal Agreement
Transportation Benefit Dist (2009) a. Establish ord.; (b) set public hearing; (c) draft resolution; (d) ballot language
Transportation Impacts _
Use Agreement (Cary Driskell) .
Water rights
Winter Retreat: January 9, 2010 (tentative) = Awaiting action by others;
doesn't allow for time for public comments]
Draft Advance Agenda 7/2/2009 8:05:44 AM Page 3 of 3
~F SPO NE VALLEY
- Request f~~ ~ouncil Action
Meeging Date; July 7, 2009 Gity Manager Sign-off:
ltern: Gheck all that apply: ❑ consent old business new business Qpublic hearing
information ~ admin. report 0 pending fegislation
►4►GEND►4 ITEM TITLE: Council External Commit#ee Reparts ,
GOlIEFt1VING LEGISLAT1ON:
PREVI(]l!S COUNGIL ACT1ON TAKEN:
BACKGROUND: Gify Councilmembers serve an variQUs facal andlnr regional Gommittees. The
purpose of this item is if any cDrnmi#tee ar board that Council cS involWed with has significant
palicy questions that are being posed and vuhfch nee+d Gouncil feedback, this is fhe ❑pportunity
fflr" GvunciE to gather that feedb~ck so fhat aCouncil posEtion cauld be registered on any given
item.
OPTIONS;
REGOMMENDE❑ ACTION OR M4TION:
BuDGEl"IF1NANClAL 1MPACTS:
STAFF1COUlVGIL CONT►4CT: Councilmembers
ATT►+4CHMENTS: .f
, Cl-TY OF SPOKANE VALLEi
Req~es7t for ~ouncii Action .
M-eetihg Date: July 7, 2009 Ci#y Manager SOgn-off:
atlb s~o. Chec'k all that app!y: ❑ cansent oId business ~ new business ❑ public hearing .
~ infarmation ❑ admin. report❑ pending Fegislation
►AGENDA ITEM TITLE; Easement fm~ private sewer 7in~~
GO'U'ERNlIVG LEGISLATION:
PkEVIOUS COUNCIL ►ACTION'Ti4KEN; ,
BACKGROU~NC): There are two resi+dents, Charles Benage: vn the Southeast corner vf 48th and
Fe1ts and Lynn 111lhiting on the 5outhwest corner vf 48 th and Felts that have difficult sewer
cannections o ut #o th+e nevtir sewer rrtain on ~~th Street, M ar~k Stiltz, project manager fQr the
County utility prvject has been working with them and has requested that we consider granfFng
them an easement aiang Fe1ts ❑ut fo 48th to aClaw them to malce thear connectiQn to the back of
their houses. At#ached is a map with the appraximate ivcation of thedr private connections and a
copy of the propvsed easement document. -
OPTIO'N5: Place the easement on the next agenda ar give staff further direcfion.
RECOMMEMDE❑ ACTlON OR MOTiC~N-:
BUDGET/F➢N►4NC114L 1MP►4CTS: STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten
ATTACHMENTS: Map and Easemen#
Page 1 vf 1
Nell Kersten
Frorn: Stiltz, Mark [mako:MStiltz@spokanecotmty.Gro]
Sen#: Thw`5day, May 14, 2049 14;19 AM
To; NeR Kersten
Cc: Cooke, Ktvin
Subjact. Passslble sokUvn far servkV B&age & W'F~tlnp
Neil,
This la about the sewor aervicx ak 48th & Felta 1o [N. gonage and Dr.1Mhiting. They hare difkuk connesions, W 1 may have came
up whh a qossib'le so1utiarr, Howewr my idea reclrlres the appraval ofi ge +City. Thse Cvunty oaurd k►stal aS" slub kct>m aur:ewder
rnain in 48th Avenue ftt wauld krra up with the paved shaulder on Feb Rd along Dr. W"hftgs touse.
From hece, W"ing ancf Benage coutd erctend the stua along the shcrOder mroa arad ek ft aPP{oPOate Iocatian, spt off iMo #+wo d"
Pipes to titeir reapective hvmes. &ee the blue Nne In the piclure beiow.
I have not yet men#oned ihis btrem bacauas thw Ciiy would have to agree fo sfranchise pernkft their privsle stubs in the Cityy
Ft-+U-W.
if the City wauid be ngreeabfe to tNs opproach, Let ma know and ! wilf discuss it vvitfa Ihern.
,x ;
~ i, + , ~ ' . , ~
•a
.
t-
P ~ 1
! ~ - , - y : • ~ ° ~ + ,gu• y,;,f:
` ~i~
`
:f,
'
~p
~
i
' . r.~M' ♦ .I- 'YIr 1
~ F ~
~
~
y '
x
~ ~ ~ .
* 4 ~
, . ~r 'r^','~~t'c~• . < - , W`, - r
s s .
MI3i'k Sti1tz
Project Managtr
Spcrkune Cbunty Div. qf Utgfties
Fet: (509) 477-9469
Fax: (509) 477-4715
613U120Q9
Filed at the Request af:
City of Spakane Va11ey, VVashington .
11707 East Sprague, Suite 106
Sgakane Valley, WA 99206
. GRANTOF EASEMENT
F~R CONSIDERAT~ON [3F THE ACTUAL BENE'~ITS HEREIN I~ERrVED
by the parties, the undersigned ~~~tor hereby grants an easement to Grantee for the
placement of a water pipe in Grantor's n'ght-of way,
The easernent for placement of a watex pipe is described as fol~ows:
~
Sitaaated irn the Couln:ty of Spakane, ~~~~e of Wash:ingtvn
Par+cel No.:
Said easement shall be sub~~~~ ~o the fmllowing conditions:
1 , Recov~~ of Casts. Grante~ shall be subi ~ect ta alX permit fees assocxated with
activities undertaken thxaugh the authvrity granted in this Easement or under
ordinances of the Crty. VWhere the City incurs cQsts and expenses for review or
inspeGtion of activiti~s undertaken~ through the a~thority granted ir~ this Easement ar any ardinances relatin,g to the subject for which apea-rnit. fee is nat established,
Grantee shall pay such costs and expenses directly to the City. In additian ta the
abave, Gxantee shal:l promptly reimburse the City far any a:nd all casts it .
~
- reasonably incurs in response to any emergency invalving Grantee' s facilities.
' -l-
2. Non-Exclusiv~itv. This Easemerat sha.ll. in no wav. Drevent or ta~~~~~t the
Cifiv from ~~~~a anv of its right-of-wavs, raads. streets or other vulblic proDerties or
affect its iurisdiction over them -or aavLW of them. T'he ~itv her+ebv retains ful1
~ower to ma:ce al~ ~~~np-es. relocatioras. re-Dairs, ma.intena~~~~ ~stablishments.
JmDrovements. dedicatians ~or vacatian of same as the Citv mav deem fit. including
the dedication. establishment, mairnt~~ance. and xmDxovement of all new riizhtsrof-
wav. streets, avenues. thorou~hf~es a.nd c~ther public prO~ae~ies of everv tvDe ~:nd
~iescriDti~aca,..
3. Non-Interfere~~e with Existi~g Facilities, The City sh~l have priar and
superiar right ta the use of its raads, streets, and alleys, an+d public pxvperties for
installation and maintenance of its faci1ities and vther ,governmental purposes, and
should in the sale discretion of the City a Gvnflict ari~e- with the Grantee's
facilities, the Grantee shaYl, at its own expen~e and cost, con~orm to the City's
facilities and other gavernment purposes of the City.
Th~ owners of all utilities, public or private, installed in or an such public
properties prior to the installation of the lines and facilities of the Grantee, sha1l
have preference as to the pasitianing and locatian of such utilities sQ i.nstalled with
respect ta the Grantee. Such preference shall contiraue in fihe event of the necessity
of relocating or changing the grade of any such public properties.
Grantee's system shall be construct~d and maintained in such ma.~er as not ,
public us~~~er-s, wn4o~pes,-~
to interfere with anv
Gity, or with any other pipes, wires, conduits or other facilities that may have been.
laid in the rights-,of -way lby or under the City's au~thority..
4. Ri2ht to Roads Not 5uperseded. The Gity, in the granting af this Easern.ent,
does nat waive any rights which it now holds or may hereafter aequire, and this
Easement sha11 not be canstrued sa as to deprive the City of anY powers, rights, or
privileges which it now has, may hereafter acquire, i:ncluding the right of
eminent domain, to regulate the use and eontrol of its roads e~vered by this
Easement, or to go upon any and all ~ity'roads and highvvays for any purPose
including constructing, repairing, or improving the sane in any such man.ner as the
City, vr its representatives may elect. The City shal1 retain full authoritative powcr
in the sa.me and 1~~ manner as thou~~ this Easement had never been granted.
Nothing in this Easement sha1l be cans#raedl to prevent the City fxom.
constructing facilities, grading, paving, repairing andlor altering any street, or
laying dawn, repairing or removing facilities or cor~struc#ing oX establrshing any
other publie wQrk vr improvemient. A11 such wark shall be done, insafar as
practicable, so as to n4t obstruct, injure or prevent the unrestricted use and
operation of the facilities of the Grantee u:nder this Easement. If, hawever, a.ny of
~e Grantee's facilities interfere with City prajects, Grantee's facilities shal1 be _
removed vr replaced. Any and all such remova.l or repracement sha.ll be - at the sole ;
expense ❑f the Grantee. Should Grantee fail to rernove, adjust or relocate its
-2-
facilities by the date established by th:rouah{ " - ' written notice to the ~'`irantee, the City may cause aadlor effect such remaval, adj ~sttnent ar relc~cation,
and the expense thereof shall be paid by.Grantee. . .
5. Restora~ion After Ca~~truction. Grantee shall, ~~r installation, ~~~struction.
relocation, ~ain~enance, or ~e-pair of facilitLes within the :area of t:his Easement,
.restox~ the surface of t1~~ ~ aht-af wav or nubl:ic propertv to at Ieast the curr~~~ ~
ad0Dted Ci~ ~tandards or as reauired by the ~~tv Pub1ic Works DeDarkment
thrvugh a ri aht-a~ ~~v r)errr~it. depending uvon special circumstances. Graatee
~grees to Dr~mt)tlv complete all r~~~~~~~~~n work anei to ua~mi)t~~ ~epair any -
damasae caused by such work within the area of this Easement _or othe~ ~~~ct~~
~~a ~t i~~ ~ole cost gnd ex~ense.
C. Dan~an and Nan-Compliance. Any and al1 danaagea or injury, done oar
~ caused ta City right-of- ~way, ~ity facilities, ~r any partion thereof in the
constxuctian, operation, maintenarice or repair of Grantee's facilities shal1 be
~mmediately repaired and recc~~stiructed ta the satisfaction of the City
' , .Public War~~ ~~~artment; and in the event the Grantee shall fail, neglect,
or refuse to initmediately repair and reconstruct said damage or injury ~ity
right--:of~1-,way or facilities, the same may be done by fihe City and the cost ar1d
expense shall be inrnediately paid by the Grantee to the City.
If it is discovered by the ~Ci~y that Grantee has damaged, injured4 ur failed to
- restare the right-of =way in accordance v+ifxi this Easement, the City shal1 provide
the Grantee with wxitten notice including adescript~on of actions the City believes
necessary to restore the right --:of--way. If the right _of way is nvt restored within
ten (10) days' from written notice, the City, or its autharized agent, may restare th~
~~ghtrof =way and faczlities, The Gra.ntee is respvnsuble for all costs and ~xpenses
incurred by the ~City to repakr a.nd restore the right-of- ~way and facrlities in
accordance vvith this Easement.
7. Inss)ections and Fees. A1~ ~erfarrned by ~rantee sha11 be su'bject ta
inspectian by and apprvval of tfie City, The (~rantee shall reimburse the ~City for
a1l ~expenses incurred by the City xn the examination, inspecfion, and approval of
Grantee's work. Such reimbursem.ent sha11 be in additivn to any other fees ar
charges levied by the City.
8. +Citv OrdinanGes and Regulations. Nothing h~~ein sha11 be deemed tQ dixect or
restxict the City's a.bility to adapt and enfvrce all nec~~sary and appropriate
ordinances regulating the performance of tkae conditians of fihis Easement,
including any reasonable ort~~nances r~ade in the exerclse of its police pmwers in.
the i.nterest of publi~ ~~ety and for the welfare of the public. The City shall have
the autharity at aTl ~imes to control by appropriate regalations the location,
elevation, and man:ner of canstruction and maintenance of any facilities by
Grantee, and Grantee sha11 promptly cQnfor~ ~ith al1 such regulations, unless
- camplian~e wouYd cause C-rrantee tv violate Qther requYrements of law.
. -3-
~"]a#ed #:his day af Juzae, 2004, ~
Grantor:
CITY +QF SPOKANE VALLEY:
BY. -
DAVID MER+CIER
City Manager
At'test: .
CARY. P. DR~SKEY.L,
Deputy City Attva-ney
STATE +C)F WASHTNGTON )
~ ss. .
Cvunty of Spokane }
C]n this day of ,2004, before me, the undersigned, a
N~tary Public in and for the State Washingtflng persQnally appeared David
Merciex and Cary F. Driskell, ta a~e known ta be the individuals wha exeGUted the
vuithin and foregoing instrument, and acknawle+dged the said instr-ument to bc t,heir
fxee and vvluatary act and deed fmr the uses and purpases therein mentioned.
IN WITNESS WHEREUF, I have hereuntv set my hand and official seal fihe
day and year ~'irst aboUe written.
- No$ary Publie in and for the 5tate of
Washingtan, residing at Spcakane Val1ey. My ~ommission expires
: . -4- .
, Grantee: Opportuaity Cemetery AssociatYVn.
BY:
WALLACE PLOWMIAN
President
STA~~ ~~SI-II~GTON ~
) ss.
County af Sp~kane ~
On this day of ,2004, befare me, the undersigned, a
Notary Publie in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared Wallace Plawman, to me known to be the irrdividuals who ex~~~ted t.he within and
foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrumenf to be their free and
valun~~ act and deed for the uses and purpases therein mentioned.
IN WITNESS =WW~IEREOF, I have hereurnto set my hand a.a~ ~ficia1 seal the
day and year first abave written.
Notary Publ'rc in azd for the State af
Washin,~on, residing at Spokane Va11ey.
My commission expires
-5-