The URL can be used to link to this page

2018, 01-09 Regular MeetingAGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING FORMAL FORMAT MEETING Tuesday, January 9, 2018 6:00 p.m. Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers 10210 E Sprague Avenue Council Requests Please Silence Your Cell Phones During Council Meeting CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION: Pastor Al Hulten, Valley Assembly Church PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF AGENDA INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS COMMITTEE, BOARD, LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS MAYOR'S REPORT PROCLAMATION: PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those on this agenda as action items. (Action items include public hearings, and those items under NEW BUSINESS. Public Comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.) When you come to the podium, please state your name and city residence for the record and limit remarks to three minutes. 1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. Proposed Motion: I move to approve the Consent Agenda. a. Approval of claim vouchers on Jan 9, 2018 Request for Council Action Form, Total: $3,637,398.37 b. Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending December 15, 2017: $331,675.35 c. Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending December 31, 2017: $490,492.69 d. Approval of December 12, 2017 Council Meeting Minutes, Special Meeting e. Approval of December 12, 2017 Council Meeting Minutes, Regular Formal Format f. Approval of December 19, 2017 Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session Format NEW BUSINESS: 2. First Reading Ordinance 18-001, Nuisances — Cary Driskell, Erik Lamb [public comment] 3. First Reading Ordinance 18-002, Unfit Dwellings — Cary Driskell, Erik Lamb [public comment] 4. Resolution 18-001 Repealing & Replacing Resolution 17-001, Bank Signing Authority— Chelsie Taylor [public comment] 5. Motion Consideration: Award of LTAC Funds — Chelsie Taylor [public comment] 6. Appointments: Councilmembers to Committees — Mayor Higgins [public comment] 7. Appointments: Planning Commission — Mayor Higgins [public comment] 8. Appointments: Lodging Tax Advisory Committee — Mayor Higgins [public comment] Council Agenda 01-09-18 Formal Format Meeting Page 1 of 2 PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those on this agenda as action items. (Action items include public hearings, and those items under NEW BUSINESS. Public Comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.) When you come to the podium, please state your name and city residence for the record and limit remarks to three minutes. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS 9. Solid Waste Collection Street -Wear Fee - Morgan Koudelka, Erik Lamb, Henry Allen 10. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins INFORMATION ONLY n/a CITY MANAGER COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT General Meetinji Schedule (meeting schedule is always subject to change) Regular Council meetings are generally held every Tuesday beginning at 6:00 p.m. The Formal meeting formats are generally held the 2nd and 41 Tuesdays. Formal meeting have time allocated for general public comments as well as comments after each action item. The Study Session formats (the less formal meeting) are generally held the 1St 3'=d and 5r'—' Tuesdays. Study Session formats DO NOT have time allocated for general public comments; but if action items are included, comments are permitted after those specific action items. NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical, hearing, or other impairments, please contact the City Clerk at (509) 921-1000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made. Council Agenda 01-09-18 Formal Format Meeting Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request forCouncil Action Meeting Date: January 9, 2018 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Following Vouchers: VOUCHER LIST VOUCHER NUMBERS TOTAL AMOU1N"1' 121102017 '13336-13375 $105,222.24 12/15/2017 43376-43409 $170359.55 12/19/2017 7510-7517 $1,156.00 12/21/2017 43410-43466 $964,278.90 12/22/2017 6137; 6146; 6147; 6149; 6151; 3418042 $76,541.26 12/28/2017 43467-43'195 (-43493 and 43494) $429,859.78 01/03/2018 43496-43538; 3450276 $1,889,980.64 GRAND TOTAL: $3,637,39837 Explanation of Fund Numbers found on Voucher Lists #001 - General Fund Other Funds 001.011.000.511. City Council 101 — Street Fund 001.013.000.513. City Manager 103 -• Paths &.. Trails 001.013.015.515. Legal [05—1•-lnte1/Motel Tax 00] .016.000. Public Safety 106 Solid Waste 001.018.013.513. Deputy City Manager 120 - Cen.terPiaace Operating Reserve 001,0 [ 8.014.514. Finance 121— Service Level Stabilization Reserve 001.018.016,518. Humana Resources 122 — Winter Weather Reserve 001.032.000. Public Works 204 — Debt Service 001.058.050.558. CED - Administration 301 REST 1 Capital Projects 001.058.051.558. CED —Economic Development 302 — RF.FT 2 Capital Projects 001,058.055.558, Cl.D — Deve[oprnent Services -Engineering 303 Srreet Capital Projects 001.058.056.558, C'EI) Developrnen4. Services -Planning 309 — Parks Capital Giants 001.058,057.558 CPD — C3a.ai[ding 310—Civic BldgCapital Projects 001.076.000.576. Parks & Ree Adminis[ralion 311 —Pavement Preservation 001.076.300.576. Parks & Rcc-Maintenance 3 E2—Capital Reserve 001.076.301.571. Parks & ltec-Recreation 314 - .Railroad Grade Separation Projec[s 001.076.302.576. Parks & Ree- Aquatics 402 — Stormwatcr Management 001.076,304.575, Parks & Rec- Senior Center 403 — Aquifer Protection Area 001.076.305.571. Parks & Ree-CenterPlacc 501 — Equipment Rental & Replacement 001.090.000.511. General Gov't- Council related 502 — Risk Management 001.090.01)0.514. General Gov't -Finance related 001.090.000.517. General Gov't-Finployee supply 001.090.000.518. General Gov't- Centralized Services 001.090.000.519. General Gov't -Other Services 001.090.000,540, General Gov't -Transportation 001.090.000.550. General Gov't Natural & Economic. 001.090.000,560. General Gov't -Social Services 00] .090.000.594. General Gov't -Capital Outlay 001.090,000.595, General Gov't -Pavement Preseivation RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve attached list of claim vouchers. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda or may be removed and discussed separately.] STAFF CONTACT: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: Voucher Lists vchIist 1211412017 8:22:05AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 9 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43336 12?1412017 004820 A&I DISTRIBUTORS 43337 12114/2017 005272 AIKMAN CUSTOM HOMES 43338 1211412017 003078 ALLWESTTESTING & ENGINEERING 43339 12114/2017 003775 AM HARDWARE 43340 1211412017 005268 ATLAS ADVERT[SING LLC 43341 1211412017 004439 BIRCH COMMUNICATIONS INC 43342 12{1412017 001122 CAMERON-REILLY LLC 43343 12/14/2017 000322 CENTURYLINK 43344 12/1412017 000508 CONOCOPHILLIPS FLEET 43345 12114/2017 000583 DAVID EVANS & ASSOCIATES 43346 12/1412017 000235 DB SECURE SHRED 3044593 3047566 3047721 3050161 3050273 9056891 BLD -2015-1349 85713 40307 1505 1506 25276045 PAY APP 4 NOVEMBER 2017 52218122 411424 2721072015 FundlDept 001.058.057.5 58 001.058.057.558 001.0 58.057.555 001.058.057 558 001.058.055.558 001.058.057.556 001.0 58.059.322 313.000.215.594 001.033,000.518 001.058.051.558 001.058.051.558 001.076,305.575 303.303.141.595 001.090.000.516 001.058.057.558 101.042.000,542 001.090,000.518 Description/Account Amount BULK OIL PURCHASE FOR FLEET I BULK PURCHASE FOR FLET MAR BULK PURCHASE FOR FLEET MAIr BULK PURCHASES FOR FLEET MF TRANSMISSION FLUID FOR 4-008 BULK PURCHASES FOR FLEET M4 Total: REISSUE PERMIT REFUND BLD -20 rotar: 0215 - MATERIALS TESTING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADVERTISING ADVERTISING Total: Total Total : PHONE SERVICE AT CENTERPLAC Total : 0141 -CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT Total : CITY HALL PHONES Total NOVEMBER 2017 FLEET FUEL BIL Total: TRAFFIC SERVICES Total REISSUE CHECK -DOCUMENT DE: 104.32 52.16 52.18 52.16 23.15 254.76 538.71 185.75 185,75 8,607.50 6,607.50 870.44 870.40 3,224.00 6,750.00 9,974.00 433.63 433.63 525.00 525.00 238.73 238.73 1.591.8E 1,591.86 919.50 919,50 156.30 Page: vch list Voucher List 12114/2017 8:22:05AM Spokane Valley Page: 2 Bank code : apbank Voucher Data Vendor Invoice 43346 112114120117 000235 000235 DB SECURE SHRED (Continued} 43347 12/14120117 002604 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC 79273355 79276655 43348 12114/2017 006411 DIENER, GALE F 43349 12114/2017 005315 DrLWON, JACOB 43350 12/14/.2017 004950 EIGHT31 CONSULTING 43351 12/14/2017 003697 ELECTRIC LIGHTWAVE LLC 43352 12/14/2017 001253 GORDON THOMAS HONEYWELL 43353 12/1412017 000011 GREATER SPOKANE VALLEY 43354 12/14/2017 000410 GRIFFIN PUBLISHING INC_ 43355 12/1412017 000692 GUS JOHNSON FORD 43356 12/14/2017 000002 H & H BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC. PARCEL 55073.1755 Expenses 1070 15040110 Novl7 1042 27813 20975 494472 AR54720 AR54721 AR54722 AR54723 AR54724 AR54981 Fund/Dept 001.090.000.548 001.090.000.:48 303.303.123.595 001.01 3,015.515 313,000.215.594 001.090.0 0 0.586 001.011.000.511 001.011.000.511 001.010.013.5113 101,042.000,542 001.011.000.511 001.018.014.514 001.013.415.515 001.013,000.513 001.058,050.558 001.018.01 5.518 Description/Account Amount Total : COMPUTER LEASE 3050 MICRO COMPUTER LEASE: 3 YR WORKS1 Total : CIP 0123 TEMPORARY CONSTRUC Total : REISSUE EXPENSE REIMBURSEM Total : PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INTERNET SERVICE GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS Total : Total Total : DECEMBER BUSINESS CONNECT! Total : HOT TOPICS WINTER 2017-2018 Total : SPECIAL ORDER PART FOR #5-202 Total : COPIER COSTS COPIER COSTS COPIER COSTS COPIER COSTS COPIER COSTS COPIER COSTS Total : 156.30 236.68 2,3117.96 2,554.64 250.00 250.00 11.05 11.05 4,500.00 4,500.00 235.73 235.73 4.681.55 4.681,66 70.00 70.00 10,412.73 10,412.73 53.99 53.99 302,79 44.18 306.02 567,23 221.17 143.66 1,585.05 Page: 2 vcrlist 12{1412017 8:22:05AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 3 Bank code ; apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43357 12114/2017 005191 HALEY. PArvl 43358 12114120/7 003297 HIGGINS_ LEWIS ROD 43359 121142017 006409 HODGSON, \'ERON!CA 43360 1211412017 004926 LE CATERING CO 43361 1211412017 001104 MCCAFN INC. 43352 12J14/2017 002203 NAPA AUTO PARTS 43363 12114/2017 001035 NDM TECHNOLOGIES INC 43364 12/14/2017 005356 NIMRI,AIMEE 03-2017 EXPENSES PARCEL 55074.1 658 Contract #28 Contract #31 1NV0225008 INV0225196 0538-822897 0538-825489 0538-831696 0538-832510 0538-832534 0538-832577 0538-833525 0538-833939 0538-834799 0538-835062 1351-.1421128 1351-142130 26542 20543 Fund/Dept 001.011.000.511 001.011.000.511 303.303.123.595 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.675 303.000.222,595 303,000.222.595 101.042.000.542 101,042.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 001.033.000,518 101.042.000.542 001.058.065.558 001.058.066.558 001.058,056.524 101.042.000.542 00 1.090.000.518 00 1.090,000,518 EXPENSES 001.076.30 5.575 Description/Account Am ount REISSUE 03-20117 CELL PHONE AL Total EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : CI P 0123 - TEMPORARY GONSTRU Total REISSUE CATERING INVOICE: IND REISSUE CATERING INVOFCE: E r. Total : 0222 -SIGNAL EQUIPMENT 0727 -SIGNAL EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES Total Total : EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENA1 EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENAT Total: 135.00 135.00 81.58 81.58 251,00 251.00 153.24 1,085.45 1,238.69 114,108,12 17,168.66 31,278.78 - 19.58 - 10.65 15.45 27.87 -6.42 119.83 15,09 48.25 50.36 66.54 11,72 13,77 344.73 1,197.00 1,197.00 2,394.00 REISSUE EXPENSE REIMBURSE1'1I 10.00 Total : 10.00 Page: 3 vchFist 12/14/2017 8:22:05AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 4 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43365 12114'2017 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC_ 43366 12/14/2017 004621 OREILLYAUTOMOTIVE STORES INC 43367 "2114/2017 002424 PITNEY BOWES GLOBAL 43368 12/14/2017 000019 PURFECT LOGOS LLC 43359 12/14/2017 000031 ROYAL BUSINESS SYSTEMS 006361558001 2862-231152 2562-231199 2862-232505 2862-232523 2862-232525 2862-232725 2882-232727 2862-232732 2862-232839 2862-232921 2862-232931 2862-233687 2862-234482 2862-234575 2862-234612 2882-234999 2882-235026 2862-235050 2862-236682 2862-236684 2862-236726 2862-236743 2862-236753 3304939586 46299 46355 Fund/Dept 001 . 090,0{10.518 001.058.057.558 001.058.0 57.558 001.058.057.558 001.058.055.558 101.000.000.542 001.058.057.558 101.000.000.542 402.402.000.531 001.058,057.558 001.058.057.558 101.042.000.542 001.058.057.558 101.042.000. 542 101.042.000.542 101.042.000.542 101.042.004.542 101.042.404.542 101.042.000.542 101.042.000.542 141.042.0 0 0.542 001.032.000.543 101.042.000.542 001.058.057.558 001.090.000.518 001.013.000.513 001.011.000,511 1N73088 001.0 58.057.558 Description/Account OFFICE SUPPLIES: IT Amount Total : FLEET MAINTENANCE FLEET MAINTENANCE FLEET MAINTENANCE CAM SENSOR FOR 4-004 - 2006 D( FLEET MAINTENANCE FLEET MAINTENANCE FLEET MAINTENANCE FLEET MAINTENANCE FLEET MAINTENANCE BULK PURCHASES FOR FLEET PIP FLEET MACNTENANCE FLEET MAINTENANCE FLEET MAINTENANCE FLEET MAINTENANCE FLEET MAINTENANCE FLEET MAINTENANCE FLEET MAINTENANCE FLEET MAINTENANCE FLEET MAINTENANCE FLEET MAINTENANCE FLEET MAINTENANCE FLEET MAINTENANCE FLEET MAINTENANCE Total LEASE CONTRACT 2969758001 Total CUBICLE/DESK NAMES NAME PLATES Total 87.02 87.02 88.38 -13.03 91.12 27.49 -23.93 24,90 34.44 33.66 7.86 45.12 229.54 11.78 35.92 26.66 63.27 74.42 -62.04 -12.38 123.11 6.35 11.94 38.89 56.39 979.86 1,066,12 1,066.12 935.95 43.52 979.47 NOVEMBER 2417 COPIER COSTS 1,893.84 Page: 4 vchlist 121/412017 8:22:05AM Voucher List Page: 5 Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount Total : 1.893.84 43369 12114/2017 000031 000031 ROYAL BUSINESS SYSTEMS (Continued) 43370 12/14/2017 006410 SCHELLEY, % I! _IAM PARCEL 55074.1667 303.303.123.595 GIP 0123 TEr.1PORARY CONSTRUC 300.00 Tial : 300.00 43371 12/1412017 002835 $CS DELIVERY INC 10363 009.011.000.511 BROADCASTING 100.00 Total : 100.00 43372 12/1412017 003264 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 807428965 001.058.051.558 ADOBE CS SUBSCRIPTION FOR El 519.23 Total : 519.23 43373 12114/2017 002597 TWISTED PAIR ENTERPRISES LLC 11272017 001.011.000.511 BROADCASTING COUNCIL MTGS 854.00 Total : 854,00 43374 12114/2017 000087 VERIZON WIRELESS 9796520580 001,032.004543 NOVEMBER 2017 VERIZON CELL F 2,391.27 Total: 2,301.27 43375 12114/2017 000842 WM WINKLER COMPANY PAY APP 3 311,000,240.595 0240 -CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 13,923.42 40 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 40 Vouchers in this report Total : 13, 923.42 Bank total : 105,222.24 105,222.24 Total vouchers : Paae: 5 vchlist 111512017 2:43:30PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43376 12/15/2017 001 081 ALSCO 43377 1211512017 006402 ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER 43378 12/1512017 000030 AVISTA 43379 12/15/2017 001169 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY 43380 12115/2017 005401 DOG -ON -IT -PARKS INC 43381 12115/2017 000795 EARTHWORKS RECYCLING INC. 43382 12/15/2017 002308 FINKE, MELISSA 43383 12/1512017 001732 GREATER SPOKANE SUBSTANCE 43384 1211512017 000011 GREATER SPOKANE VALLEY 43385 12/1512017 0027/2 GTFX INC. 43386 12115/2017 006414 HALES. DAVID LS PO 1979297 LS P0't 984406 1990461147 1990471633 Nov 2017 1214/2017 12122 356765 Nov 2017 Nov 2017 Nov 2017 2nd QTR 2017 3rd QTR 2017 4th QTR 45349 BLD -2017-1382 Fund/Dept 001,016.018.521 001.016.016,521 001.0 76.305.575 001.076.305,575 101 042.000. 542 001 076.3.0 5.575 001.076, 0 99.576 001.076 305.575 001.076.301.571 001.076.301,571 001.090.000.560 001.090.000.550 001.090.000.550 001.0 90.000.550 001.076.305.575 00 1.058.059.345 Description/Account Amount FLOOR MAT SERVICE FOR FRECIN FLOOR MAT SERVICE FOR PRECIh Total: SUPPLIES AT CENTERPLACE SUPPLIES FOR CENTERFLACE Total: UTILITIES: PW MASTER PASTA Total PETTY CASH FOR PARKS: 15353 Total ; VM DOG PARK BENCHES & SHADE Total RECYCLING COLLECTION AT CP 1 Total INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT INSTRUCTOR PMT Total : 2017 SOC SER GRANT REIMBURSI Total : 2017 ECO DEV GRANT REIMBURSI 2017 ECO DEV GRANT REIMBURSI 4TH QTR ECO DEV GRANT REIMBL Total: SERVICE GREASE TRAP AND SUM Total : PERMIT REFUND BLD -2017-1382 24.12 24.12 48.24 523.55 523.55 1,047.10 28, 563.55 28, 553.55 10.00 10,00 15.543, 80 15,543.80 27.50 27.50 1,215.00 33.75 1,248.75 729.48 729.4.8 4,285.75 4,285.75 4,285.75 12,857.25 164.29 164.29 27.65 Page; vchlist 1211512017 2:43:30PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 7 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 433313 12/1512017 006414 006414 HALES, DAVID 43387 1211512017 000441 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERV CES 43388 12/15?2017 002607 HUB SPORTS CENTER 43389 12/1512017 006407 IDAHO ASSN OF BUILDING 43390 1211512017 000070 INLAND POWER & LIGHT CO 43391 12//1512017 000388 IRVIN WATER DIST, #6 43392 12/15/2017 001635 ISS FACILITY EVENT SERVICES 43393 1211512017 004926 LE CATERING CO 43394 12115/2017 006415 MARMON, TONY 43395 12115120/7 000132 MODERN ELECTRIC WATER CO 43396 12/15/2017 006416 PARKER, SHELLY 43397 12/15/2817 001860 PLATT ELECTRICAL SUPPLY (Continued) Nov 2017 Dec 2017 4574 Nov 2017 Nov 2017 1241201 1241204 1242770 E00465 E00469 BLD -2017-3380 Nov 2017 Nov 2017 BLD -2017-2843 P098813 P099203 Fund/Dept 001,032.000.543 105.000.000.557 001,018,016,518 101.042.000.542 001.076.300.576 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 0 01.076.30 5.575 001.076.305.575 001.058.059.322 001.076.302.576 101.042.000.542 001.058.059.322 001,073.305.575 001.476.305.575 Description/Account Amount Total SUPPLIES FOR PUBLIC WORKS Total : 2017 LODGING TAX GRANT REIMS Total : JOB POSTING FOR PERMIT FACILI Tota[ : Total : Total : L'TILITIES:PW UTILITIES: PARKS & PW EVENT SVCS AT CENTERPLACE EVENT SVCS AT CENTERPLACE EVENT SVCS AT CENTERPLACE Total : E00465: SNAP E00469: SPECIAL ORDER LINENS Total PERMIT REFUND: BLD -2017-3380 Total UTILITIES: NOV 2017 PARKS UTILITIES: NOV 2017 PW Total : PERMIT REFUND: BLD -2017-2843 Tota[ : 27.65 37.73 37.73 1,723.58 1,723.58 25.00 25.00 450.43 450.43 199.00 199.00 147.49 63,21 31.61 242.31 2,7130.48 102.82 2,863.30 52.00 52.00 1,447.42 11,762.88 13,210.34 164.75 154.75 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 36.26 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 786.72 Page: vchlist Voucher List 12/1512017 2:43:30PM Spokane Val[ey Page: -5— Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43397 12/15/2017 001860 PLATT ELECTRCCAL SUPPLY {Continued) P127720 43398 12115/2017 002592 PURE FILTRATION PRODUCTS 43399 12115.12017 000709 SENSKE LAWN & TREE CARE INC. 40328 618538 8210715 8215533 6216177 43400 12/1512017 005012 SPOKANE CO ENVCRONMENTAL Dec 2017 43401 12/1512017 001083 STANDARD PLBG HEATING CONTROLS 56367 43402 12/1512017 002306 TERRELL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, MIC 3087 43403 12115/2017 001472 TESTAC•,IERECA LABORATORIES 43404 1211512017 006413 THOMPSO, LINDA 43405 112/1512017 000295 VALLEYF E ST 43408 12/15/2017 000167 VERA WATER & POWER 43407 121/5/2017 003175 VISIT SPOKANE 59107749 Expenses Dec 2017 Oct 2017 NOV 2017 Nov 2017 Fund/Dept 00 1.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001,016.01 6.521 001.016, 016.521 001,076.3 0 0.576 001.016.01 6.521 0011.076.302.576 001.016.0 16,521 001,090.000.513 001.076.300.576 001,011.000,511 001.090.000.550 001.0 90.000.550 101, 042.000.542 105.000.000.557 Description/Account Amount SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE Total ; FILTERS FOR CENTERPLACE HVA Total ; FALL LAWN CARE AT PRECINCT DE ICING AT PRECINCT CONTRACT MAINT: PARKS NOV 20 MONTHLY SVCS AT PRECINCT: NO Total SPOKANE CO SEWER CHRG$: DE Total NOV 2017 MONTHLY P..1AINT: PREC Total : 17-017 CENTERPLACE WEST LAW Total : J7628-1 MONTHLY DRINKING %NATE Total EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total; 2017 ECO DEV GRANT REIMBURSI 2017 ECO DEV GRANT REIMBL'RSI Total : UTILITIES: NOV 2017 Total 2017 LODGING TAC GRANT REIC•:1B Total 19.11 842.09 281.27 281.27 52.17 299.00 60,343.91 596.12 61,29120 1,785.48 1,78 5.48 642.90 642.90 1,807.44 1,807434 28.50 28.50 62.66 62.66 6.7}.49 3:633.94 10,4119.43 ;3.698.53 3,698.53 2,594.17 8.594.17 P gc: vchfist 12115/017 2143130PM Voucher List Spokane Va!Tey Page;I Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43408 1ZF1512017 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 43409 12115/2017 004961 ZOME INC 34 Vouchers for bank code _ apbank 34 Vouchers in this report 1. the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, ar the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and cert i said claim. Finance director Data Council member reviewed:. Mayor Date Council Member Date 0575577-2681-7 0575483-2681-9 0577249-2681-1 ZD M-33771 Fund1Dept 001.076,305.575 001.016 016,521 001.033,000.518 001.076.305.575 Desc ri ptionf Accou nt WASTE MGMT: CENTERPLACE WASTE MGMT: PRECINCT WASTE MGMT CITY HALL 2017 Total : STAFF SHIRTS AND UNIFORMS FO Total : Amount 767.14 286.31 344.18 1,397.63 282.24 282.24 Bank total : 176,359.55 Total vouchers : 170,354.55 Page: vchlist 1.2119f2017 3:15:58PM Voucher List Page' Spokane Valley Bank code : p'c-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept DescriptionIAocount Amount 7510 12f19i2017 006155 ALBERTS, KRISTY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 COOL CAMP REFUND 205.00 Total ; 205.00 7511 12119/2017 005304 CASCADE LAKES RAGE GROUP LLC PARKS REFUND 001,237,10,99 RE'.SSUE DEPOSIT REFUND; MIRA 300.00 Total : 300.00 7512 12119/2017 006418 DRAPEAU, DARCIA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREAT ROOM 210.00 Total ; 210.00 7513 1211012017 004762 FEAGAN, TASHA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 REISSUE DEPOSIT REFUND IVIISSI 52.00 Total : 52.00 7514 12/1012017 006311 FPI MANAGEMENT PARKS REFUND 001.237.10,99 REISSUE DEPOSIT REFUND: SULLL 75.00 Total 75.01) 7515 1211912017 004341 GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 REISSUE DEPOSIT REFUND: ROOT 52.00 Total : 52.00 7516 12/19/2017 005496 LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF SPOIL. CO_ PARKS REFUND 001.237.:0.99 RE:SSL E #2 DEPOSIT REFUND: R 52.00 Total ; 52.00 7517 12119/2017 005417 LONG, BONNIE PARKS REFUND 001237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: FIRESIDE L01.11 210.00 8 Vouchers for bank code : pk-ref 8 Vouchers in this report Total : 210.00 Bank total : 1,156.00 Total vouchers : 11,15 6.00 Page: vch 1 ist 1212112 017 11:35:14AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: -1— Bank code ; apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43410 1212112017 000958 AAA SWEEPING LLC 43411 1212112017 003563 ACES VALLEY POWER TOOL 60152 60153 295202 43412 122112017 002543 AIR ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT & TOOLS 224564 43413 12/2112017 002931 ALL WESTERN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 105571 43414 1212112017 003775 AM HARDWARE 40344 43415 1212112017 003337 ARROW CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY INC 207312 43416 1212112017 000673 BUDGET ARBOR & LOGGING LLC 43417 12/2112017 000101 CDW-G 43418 1212112017 002572 CINTAS CORPORATION 43419 12/21/2017 000840 CLARY, AARON 43420 12121)2017 002604 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC 11-3521 LCK6442 LCS3127 LCV9034 606292827 606294142 606295443 605295770 Expenses FundlDept 402.402.000.531 101.042.000.542 101.042.000.542 101.0 00.000.542 101.000.000,542 001.033.000.518 101.042.0 00.542 101.042.000,542 001.090.000.518 001.090.000.518 001,090.000.518 101,042.000.543 101 042.000.543 101,042,000.543 101.042 0 00.543 402.402.0 0 0.531 79295578 001.143.70.00 Description/Account Amount STORM DRAIN CLEANING STREET SWEEPING Tota[: SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIP - STF Tota[: SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQU[P. SNO Total SUPPLIES: SNOWPLOWS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SUPPLIES; STREET Total Total Total : REISSUE PMT - TREE TRIMMING Total : COMPUTER SOFTWARE - NON -CA MONITOR REFRESH BROTHER PDS -6044 DOCUMENT 4 Total: SERVICES AT MAINT. SHOP CONT[ SERVICES AT MAINT. SHOP CONT[ SERVICES AT MAINT. SHOP CONTE SERVICES AT MAINT. SHOP CONT[ Total REISSUE EXPENSE REIMBLIRSEM! Total COMPUTER LEASE: 001-892217-00 5,870.92 61,443.56 67, 314.48 13,27 1317 44.97 44.97 151.65 151.65 136.76 136.76 54.03 54.03 12,403,20 12,403.20 329.40 7,913.24 2,909.29 11,151.93 142.78 131.82 131.82 131:82 538.24 11.41 11.41 1,050.24 Page: vch l ist 12/2112017 11:35:14AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page_' Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43420 12/21/2017 002604 43421 112/2112017 000734 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 43422 12.x2112017 000734 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 002604 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC (Continued} 43423 12/21/2017 002920 DIRECTV FNC 43424 12121/2017 001651 DOMRESE, DAN 43425 12121/2017 002157 ELJAY OIL COMPANY 43426 12121)2017 003392 EPICENTER SERVICES LLC 43427 12012017 003274 EXCHANGE PUBLISHING LLC 43428 12121/2017 001232 FASTENAL CO RE 46 JG8457 L009 RE-313-ATB71114093 33001751905 EXPENSES 4269856 2017-22 473988 476187 478188 476189 476191 476809 476810 4765111 476512 476814 476815 IDLEW125603 IDLEW126168 I DLEW 128193 Fund/Dept 309.0 0 0.227.595 303.303.141.595 101.042,000.543 001.018,014.514 101.042.000.542 106.000.000.537 309.0 0 0.237.595 001.013.000.513 001.013.000.513 001.013.000,513 001.058.056.558 001.013.000.513 001.013.000.513 001.013,000.513 001.013.000.513 001.058.056.558 001.058.056.558 101.042.000,542 101.042.000.642 101.042.000.542 Description/Account Amount Total: CIP 0227 - TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSPE Total: CIP 141 - CONSTRUCTION ENGINE Total: CABLE SERVICE FOR MA1NTENAN Total EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : FUEL FOR SNOWPLOW/MAINTE1, Total : PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADVERTISING LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION Toter : Total : SMALLTOOLS/MINOR EQUIP; STR SMALLTOOLS/MINOR EQUIP: STR SMALLTOOLSIMINOR EQUIP: STR Total: 1,050.24 1, 203.15 1,203.15 426.39 426,39 57.99 57.99 230.00 230.00 1,144.68 1,144.68 2,582.18 2,582.16 51.00 35.25 19.50 24.49 80.58 35.25 41.25 75.05 52.14 64.78 56.09 535.38 11.97 7.95 57.39 77.31 Page: veh1ist 12/2112017 11:35:14AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 'Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43429 1212112017 003201 FEHR 8. PEERS 43430 12121/2017 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 43431 1112112017 002975 FREEDOM SALES AND SUPPLY LLC 43432 12121/2017 005474 FREIGHTLINER NORTHWEST 43433 12/21/2017 006423 GRIGSBY, JANET G 43434 1212112017 002043 HDR ENGINEERING INC 43435 1212112017 001944 LANCER LTD 43436 12121/2017 002552 MDM CONSTRUCTION INC. 43437 1212112017 002259 MENKE JACKSON BEYER LLP 43438 1212112017 000293 MORAN FENCE INC. 118649 47990 48062 4$065 48066 48070 48086 2017865 PC001 397475:01 PC001397659:01 PC001398386:01 PC001398859_01 PARCEL 55073.1757 1200087794 0467315 PAY APP 6 462 7230 FuncUDept 314, 000,223.595 309.000.237.595 001.013.000.513 001.013.000.513 001.058 056.5 58 001.013.000.513 001.013.000.513 001.090.000.519 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 303.303.123.595 314.000.223,595 001.0 32.000.543 303.000.251.595 0011.013.015.515 001.033.000.518 Description/Account Amount 0223 -TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ADVERTISING LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIES Total Total : Total : SUPPLIES: SNOWPLOWS SUPPLIES: SNOWPLOWS SUPPLIES: SNOWPLOWS HYDRAULIC RAM FOR MAINTENAN Total CIF 0123 - ROW ACQUISITION/TEM Total : 0223 -PROJECT DEVELOPMENT Total : BUS INESS CARDS Total : 0251 -CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT Total PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Total : 6,505.20 6,505, 20 110.40 44.80 28.90 91.80 184.80 73.95 534.65 23.39 23.39 9.53 7.54 37.99 416.65 471.71 2,123.86 2,123.86 18,796.19 18,796.19 38.09 38.[9 610,084.76 810,084.76 1,376.60 1,376.60 INSTALL FENCE 1,$99,83 Total : 1,599.83 Page: vch1ist 12/2112017 /1 : 3 5:14AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page_ -� Bank code: epbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43439 1212112017 004850 NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS, HRA PLAN 10112860 43440 12121/2017 003090 NORTH 40 OUTFITTERS 43441 12121/2017 040652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 43442 12/2112017 004821 OREILLY. AUTOMOTIVE STORES INC 43443 1212112017 001604 PACIFIC "alb'.! PAPER 43444 12/2112017 000677 PAW 434-45 12121/2017 005049 PEDERSON: MICHAEL ROY 43446 12121/2017 001089 POE ASPHAL T PAVING 3NC. 080246/3 956759700001 987593302001 987594561001 987608500001 987609368001 987609369001 989203396001 989205293001 989205351001 989205352001 2882-236751 2862-236752 2662-236792 2562-236799 2862-236874 2862-236920 2862-238629 185727 1216 NOVEMBER 2017 45.623 45624 Fund/Dept 001 018.016.518 101.042,000.542 001.018.014.514 001.090.000.518 001.090.000.518 001.018.013,513 001.015,013.513 001.018.013,513 001,090,000.516 001.090.000.518 001.090.000,518 001.0 90.000, 518 101.042.000.542 101.042,000.542 001.032.000.543 101.042.000.542 101.042,000.542 001.032.000.543 101.042.000.542 001.032.000.543 001.143.70.00 101.0 42.000.542 141.042.000.542 101,000.000.542 Descriptfon)Account Amount FLEX SPENDING ADMINISTRATION Total ; SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIP - STF Total OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE COMPUTER HARDWARE - NON -CA COMPUTER HARDWARE NON -CAF OFFICE SUPPLIES: OPS/ADMIN OFFICE SUPPLIES: OPS/ADMIN OFFICE SUPPLIES: OPS/AD.MIN 1PAD REFRESH SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIP; IT BATTERIES: IT BATTERIES: IT Total SUPPLIES FOR FLEET REPAIR & M SUPPLIES FOR FLEET REPAIR & M SUPPLIES FOR FLEET REPAIR & M SUPPLIES FOR FLEET REPAIR & M SUPPLIES FOR FLEET REPAIR & M SUPPLIES FOR FLEET REPAIR & M SUPPLIES FOR FLEET REPAIR & M Total : COPY PAPER Total : 2018 PROFESSIONAL MEMEERSHI Total: DEAD ANIMAL REMOVAL Total: 2017 STREET MAINTENANCE WINTER RESPONSE 2017 344.00 344.00 32.63 32.63 25.44 55.47 135.67 110.59 11.17 15.49 1,668.61 119.67 67.06 23.49 2,238.66 14.68 -18.62 46.45 -14.68 9/8 42.86 8.80 89.27 80.51 80.51 450.00 450.00 .600.00 1,600.00 43,631.05 4,483.23 Page: }- vchlist 12/2112017 11:35:1 4AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page. Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43446 12/21/2017 001059 001089 POE ASPHALT PAVING INC. (Continued) 43447 12/21/2017 006421 PSP ENTERPRISES INC 2002-3247 43448 43449 12/2112017 000019 PURFECT LOGOS LLC 46330 12/2112017 000675 RAMAX. PRINTING & AWARDS INC 30131 43450 17112017 403407 RIGHT! SYSTEMS INC 5r-156161 51-155212 43451 12121/2017 000994 SIMPSON ENGINEERS °NC. 43452 12121/20/7 000090 SPOKANE CO INFO SYSTEMS 4345.3 12/21/2017 004131 SPOKANE CO SOLID WASTE MGr-.1T 43454 12121/20117 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 165 111 01 16583-01 50316697 FundlDept 101.042.000.542 001_.41,3.016.518 001.053.056.558 001.090.000.518 001,090,000.518 303.000,259.595 303_00Q.264.595 CO1.011.040.511 20171206-5491-36727 101.042.000.542 110100181 110100182 50316843 50316844 43455 12121/2017 006419 SPOKANE FALLS TROUT UNLIMITED MOU 11-28-2017 43456 12/21/2017 002540 SPOKANE HOUSE OF HOSE INC, 639973 43457 12/21/2017 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 3360716857 101.042.000,5-42 311.000.248.595 001.032.000,543 402.1 43.70.00 303.303.155.595 101.042.0 0 0.542 001.058.057.558 Desch ptionfAcGVUnt ARGONNE STRIPING NAME PLATES OFFICE SUPPLIES Amount Total : Total Total: Total: RUCKUS ACCESS POINT FOR CEN JUNIPER SWITCH SUPPORT RENE Total 0259-SURVEYINGSERVICES 17 -066 -SURVEY WORK Total COUNTY ET SUPPORT NOVEMBER Total TRANSFER STATION CHARGES: P� Total : OCTOBER 2017 ENGINEERING NOVEMBER 2017 ENGINEERING EAGLE WEB ACCESS STORMBILL APPLICATION USAGE Total PROJECT 0155 - MITIGATION FOR Total : SMALLTOOLSIMINOR EQLUIP- ST5 Total OFFICE SUPPLIES; COMM_ DEV. 48,114.28 575.00 575.00 48.96 48.96 73.44 73.44 908.21 7.498.29 8,406.50 4,344.41 7,125.30 11,459.71 11,843.07 11, 843.07 43.89 43.89 49,426.59 35, 807.35 150.130 1,350.00 86, 733.94 18,000.00 18,000.00 27,31 27.31 37.31 Page: vch1ist 12121/2017 11:35:14AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: Bank code : a;,bank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43457 12,21,2017 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 43458 112121/2017 000257 STATE AUDITOR'S OFFICE 43459 1212112017 00E071 TAX RECOVERY SERVICES LLC 43460 12/21/2017 004740 THOMSON REUTERS -WEST 43461 12/21/2017 005732 TNT TRUCK PARTS 43462 1212112017 001108 TRAFFIC PARTS 1NC 43463 12/21/2017 003015 WAASP HALT PAVEMENT ASSOC 43464 12/21/2017 005400 WESTERN PACIFIC SIGNAL LLC 43465 12/21/2017 002363 WESTERN STATES EQUIPMENT CO 43466 12/21/2017 001885 ZAY0 GROUP LLC 57 Vouchers for bank code : apbarl 57 Vouchers in this report (Continued) 3360716859 33607166880 3360716862 3360716865 L123059 1064 837291858 536992 452072 21537 24481 1N000522134 DECEMBER 2017 Dl_CEP,•IBER 2017 Fund/Dept 001.0 58.057, 558 001.0 58.057, 558 00 1.0 58.057.558 001.058.057.558 001.090.000.514 101 042.000.316 001.013.015.515 101.000,000.542 303.000.222.595 001.058 055.5 58 Description/Account Amount OFFICE SUPPLIES; COMti, DEV. OFFICE SUPPLIES; COMM. DEV. OFFICE SUPPLIES: COMM. DEV, OFFICE SLIP PLI ES; COMM. DEV. Total: SAO AUDIT OF 2016 UTILITYTAX AUDIT SUBSCRIPTION CHARGES SUPPLIES FOR #203 0222 -SIGNAL EQUIPMENT Total: Total : Total Total : Total ASPHALT WORKSHOPS & TRA'NIN Total 101.042,000.542 ITS SWITCH 101.000.000.542 Total : CUTTING EDGE FOR CATERPILLAf Total : 001,090.000,518 DARK FIBER 001.090.000.518 INTERNET SERVICE Total: Bank total : 964,278.90 Total vouchers : 964,278,90 80.85 45.72 71,70 31.82 267.40 4.571.58 4,571.58 21,955.91 21,955, 91 797.69 797.69 144.98 144.98 1,599.00 1,599.00 380.00 380.00 2,160,_00 2,1Q6.00 369.38 369.36 253,25 821.02 874.27 Page: I vchlist Voucher List Pager 1212212017 9:10:09AM Spokane Valley Flank code : apba nk Voucher Date Vendor Invoice FundTOept Description/Account ARLOuat 6137 121202017 002227 IDA -10 TAX COMMISSION Ber.77534 101,231.50.0 IDAHO STATE TAX BASE; PAYMENT 1.987.50 Total : 1,967.50 6146 12/20/2017 000448 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS, 401A PLN Len77536 349,231.34-00 4D1A.:PAYMENT 29195.26 TbtaE: 29,795.26 6147 1221X2017 000682 EFTPS Sen775 .R 402.231.13,00 FED PAL TAXES: PAYMENT 35,897.45 Total: 35,897.45 6149 122012017 004145 VANTAGEPOINT TRAMPER AGENTS_ 457 P1) Ben77544 001231.18,00 457 DEFERRED CmPENSATION: PAYI 7,093.55 Total : 7,099-55 6151 12720/2047 000162 VANTAG TRANSFER AGENTS. 401A EXEC PL Den77542 001.231.14.00 401 EXEC PLAN; PAYMENT 637.50 Total: 637,50 3418042 12+20/2017 000210 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Ber,77543 401.231,29.0,7 HEALTH REIMBURSEMENT ACCO LINT 4,150.00 Total : 1,150.O0 6 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 76,541.25 Total vouchers : 76,541.26 6 Vouchers in this rapart Page: vchlist -12/2812017 9:42:06AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: •'1 - Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43467 12/28/2017 006402 ARAr•,1ARK UNIFORM & CAREER 43468 12/28/2017 000030 AVISTA 43469 12/2812017 000101 CDW-G 43470 12/28/2017 000869 EVCO SOUND & ELECTRONICS 43471 12/28/2017 004813 FIRST CHOICE COFFEE SERVICES 42472 12128/2017 005458 FIS1fER; JARED 43473 1212812017 005205 GSC MEALS ON WHEELS 43474 12/26/2017 002607 HUB SPORTS CENTER 43475 12/28/2017 002991 IAVM 1990482177 Nov 2017 KZQ95? 0 30139 193568 Expenses 2017 Dec 2017 00076337 43476 12128/2017 003316 INLAND NVV BUSINESS, TRAVEL ASSOC 2018 43477 12/28/2017 001635 ISS FACILITY EVENT SERVICES 43478 12/28/2017 005472 JOHNSON, JOHN 1245220 1245221 1245222 1245223 Expenses Fund/Dept 001.076.305.575 00 1.076.30 0.576 0 01.076, 099.594 001.076.266.394 001.0 76.305, 575 001.032.000.543 001.090.000.560 105.000, 000.557 001.143.70.00 001.143.70.00 001.076.30 6.575 001.076, 30 5.575 001.076.30 5.575 0 01.076.305.575 001.032.000.543 Description/Account Amount SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE Total : UTIL[T[E: PARKS MASTER AVISTA Total MOM -FORS FOR AV UPGRADE-CE1' Total 0266-PREL1M[NARY DEVELOPMEN Total : COFFEE SVCS FOR CENTERPLAC Total EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total 523.55 523.55 8,482.54 8,482.54 23,303.33 23,303.33 15,250,00 15, 250.00 206.22 206.22 57.72 57.72 2017 S0C SER GRANT REIMBURSI 6,811.32 Total: 5,811.32 2017 LODGING TAX GRANT REIMS Total 2018 MEMBERSHIP DUES: C. CARL Tota I : 2018 MEMBERSHIP DUES; C. CAR - Total: EVENT SVCS AT CENTERPLACE EVENT SVCS AT CENTERPLACE EVENT SVCS AT CENTERPLACE EVENT SVCS AT CENTERPLACE Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 1,165.11 1,'165.11 470.00 470.00 490,00 490.00 52.68 42.14 31.61 6321 189.64 53.86 Page: vch1ist 12/2812017 9:42:06AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page;` Bank code: aobaik Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43478 1228/2017 005472 005472 JOHNSON, JOHN 43479 1212812017 000910 MANTZ, GLORIA 43480 12128/2017 000132 MODERN ELECTRIC WATER CO 43481 12/28/2017 006425 NELSON, DON 43482 12128/2017 002534 PEAK SOFTWARE SYSTEMS 43483 12/28/2017 005238 PHILLIPS, CHAD 43484 12/2812017 001860 PLATT ELECTRICAL SUPPLY 43485 12128/2017 006424 SCHREINDL, JEREMIAH 43486 12/28/2017 000709 SENSKE LAWN & TREE CARE INC. 43487 12128/2017 000.324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST #3 43488 12128/2017 000898 SPOKANE PROCARE INC 43489 12/28/2017 001969 SUNSHINE DISPOSAL i Cor..inusd! Expenses 19374819 19374820 CPA -2018-0002 018857 Expenses P188588 Expenses 8215815 Dec 2017 600655 1239352 43490 12128/2017 000295 VALLEYFEST Dec 2017 Dec 2017 Fund/Dept 001.032.000.543 309.000.227.595 309.000,227.595 001.058.0 58.345 001.143.70.00 001.032.000.543 001.078.305.575 001.0 32.000.543 402 402.000.531 402.402.000.531 402.402.000.531 101.042, 000.542 001,0901.000.550 105.000.000, 557 Desc r1 ption/Acco urtt Amount Total: EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : UTILITIES: APPLEWAY TRAIL UTILITIES: APPLEWAY TRAIL Total : PLANNING REFUND CPA -2018-000: Tota! SPORTSMAN SQL SOFTWARE 201 Total EXPENSE RE[MBURSEMENT Total : SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Tota[ : FLAGG[NG SVC CONTRACT: NOV ; Total : WATER CHARGES FOR DEC 2017 Total : 2017 ROADSIDE WEED SPRAYING Total TRANSFER STATION= FVJ Total 53.88 60.00 60.00 54.97 39.21 94.18 1,850.00 1,850.00 2,847.71 2,847/1 5t07 51.07 3,29 3.29 59.14 59.14 530.94- 530.94 30.94 530.94 79, 48 79.48 2,813.00 2,813.00 798.03 798.03 2017 ECO DEV GRANT RE[MBURSI 6,059.30 2017 LODGING TAX GRANT REIMS 2,263,68 Page: vchlist 12/23/2017 9:42.416AIVI Voucher List Spokane Valley Page:✓ Bank code : ar}bank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43490 12/28?2017 000295 VALLEYFFST 43491 12128/2017 000167 VERA WATER & POWER (Continued) Dec 2017 Dec 2017 005338-007 028004-000 43492 12/28/2017 000098 WA CITIES INSURANCE AUTHORITY 18124 • .�Bfd-CCS 43494 12/20/2017 000036 \'VA 43495 12/28/2017 00G066 VICP SOLUTIONS 29 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 29 Vouchers in this report Fund/Dept 105.000.000.557 105.000.000.557 309.000.227.595 309.000,227.595 001.143.70.00 Description/Account Amount 20/7 LODGING TAX GRANT REIMB 2017 LODGING TAX GRANT REIMB Total: UTILITIES: APPLEWAY TRAIL UTILITIES: APPLEWAY TRAIL Total 2018 LIABILITY/PROGRAM ASSESE Total : 492.32 8:802.85 17r618.15 26.00 62.36 88.36 345.036.00 345.036.00 Total 1,13`.1.24 6,5,64;1,1-7- 29 ,55,64;1 1-7 10425957 10425958 0 011.076, 305.575 001.076.305.575 Teta! : SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE TSI : .Bank -cotta 8,755.29 906.03 2t11 927.14 427,754.31 Total vouchers-: 437,7-431 vch list 01103/2018 11:10: 56AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43496 113(2018 000707 AIR DESIGN INC. 43497 1(3/2018 0105268 ATLAS ADVERTISING LLC 43498 11312018 004231 BELSBY ENGINEERING 43499 1/312018 006429 BROOKS, GERALD G 43500 13/2018 000101 CDW-G 43501 11312018 000322 CENTURYLIN'K 43502 1?312018 000683 DAVID EVANS & ASSOCIATES 43503 1/3/2018 000742 DCI ENGINEERS 43504 11312018 002604 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC 43505 1/3/2018 000044 DELL MARKETING LP 43506 1/312018 000734 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION CSV REFUND 1522 17363 17365 55074-1574 & .1576 LFK3204 DECEMBER 2017 412559-1 412559-2 412559-3 412562 412579 112693 79312661 79314020 10208248484 Fund!Dept 001 ..000.000.321 001 058.051.558 303.000.265.595 001,058,055,558 303,303,123.595 001-090.000-518 001.076.000.576 303.000.251.595 303.303.123.595 001.032.000.543 311.000.248,595 314.000.143.595 311.000.252.595 001-/43-70-00 001.090.000,548 001.032.000,594 RE-313-ATB71114036 101.042.000.542 Description/Account Amount CSV ENDORSEMENT REFUND Total: ADVERTISING Total 0265 -TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Total CIP 0123- RO4ACQUISITIONITEM Total COMPUTER HARDWARE - NON -CA Total 2017 PHONE SVCS; ACCT 509 214 - Total 0251 -ON CALL DRAFTING 0123 -DRAFTING AND DESIGN SER' DRAFTING SERVICES GENERAL 0248 - TRAFFIC PLANS 0143 -DESIGN SERVICES 0252 - ROW CONSULTANT Total : Total : COMPUTER LEASE; 001-8922117-0 COMPUTER LEASE 3050 MICRO - Total : DELL Total: 13.90 13,00 8,492.00 8,492.00 7,349.27 1,787.50 9,138-77 52.800, 00 52,800.00 453.47 453.47 537.79 537.79 330.48 2,149.79 101.56 689.84 37,24222 40,513.89 5,740.00 5,740.00 962.93 23t68 1,094.1 2,517.34 2,517.34 REIMBURSE TRAFFIC SVCS fv/AINI 8,680.72 Page: vchlist 01103/2018 11:10: 5 6AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43505 1.3120188 000734 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION Fund/Dept (Continued) RE-313-ATB71114044 101.042.000, 542 43507 1/3/2018 006327 DEVRIES MOVING PAC14rNG STORAGE 82752 43508 1/312918 003682 EPIC LAND SOLUTIONS INC 43509 1+312018 003274 EXCHANGE PUBLISHING LLC 43510 1/3/2018 003261 FEHR& PEERS 4351//3/2018 001447 TREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 43512 113120118 006426 INITIAL.AEC 43513 11312018 004796 JORGENS, CRAIG 43514 11312018 000864 JUB ENGINEERS INC. 43515 11312018 004632 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS 1117-0614 477415 4774/6 477417 477418 477419 477421 477422 118968 48106 48107 48108 48109 120717_CSV 12-28-2017 0113199 64456078 00 1.013.000.513 303.30 3.123.595 001.013.000.513 001.013.000.513 001.013.900.513 001.058.056.558 001.013.000.513 001.058.0 55.558 001.058.056.558 314.000,143,595 001.013.000.513 001.013,000.513 001.058.056.558 001.013.000.513 001.032.000, X1-3 101.042.000,542 101.042.000.542 00 1.076.305.575 DescriptionlAccount Amount REIMBURSE TRAFFIC SERVICES Total : LABOR FOR r,i1OVING CUBICLE Tota[: 0123 -RW SERVICES LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION 0143 -TRAFFIC ANALYS`S LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION TRAINING Total: Total Total Total : Total : REIMBURSABLE REPAIRS/REMAIN Total: 2017 TIP MAINTENANCE & UPDATE Total: TELECOM SERVICES 446,16 9,128.88 2,083.50 2,083.50 3,658.29 3,658.29 41.25 71.25 49.50 53.25 18.17 70.31 26.07 329.80 19,379.20 10,379.20 129.25 268.80 121.60 25.00 544.65 6,475.00 6,475,00 4,994.62 4,994.82 4,737.87 4,737.87 1,349.71 Page: vchFist 0//0312018 11 ;10' 56AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: Bank code_ apb3rk Voucher Date Vertdar Invoice 43515 11312018 004632 004632 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS 43516 11312018 004164 NETWORKS 2000 INC 43517 113120/8 000652 OFFICE DEPOT IC. 43518 1/312018 000307 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER 43519 11312018 000019 PURFECT LOGOS LLC 43520 11312015 002578 REBUILDING & HARDFACING INC 43521 11312018 006014 RECORDS MANAGEMENT PLUS LLC 43522 1/312018 006427 RETAIL STRATEGIES LLC 43523 113;2018 002616 ROADWISE INC 43524 113/2018 000031 ROYAL BUSINESS SYSTEMS 43525 11312018 000994 SIMPSON ENGINEERS INC. (Continued) 23363 989700752001 990532751001 991715651001 991776356001 991776357001 NOVEMBER 2017 46306 59839 1649 347-1 57026 57027 57028 IN74438 16617-03 16641-01 16675-01 Fund/Dept 001.090.000.518 001.090.000.519 001.090,000.518 001.018.014.514 001,090.000.515 001.090,000,51B 001.016.000,589 001,055.057 558 101 000.000.542 001.058.057,558 001.058,099..558 101.000.000.542 101.000.0 0 0.542 101.000.0 0 0.542 00 1.058.057.558 309.000.227.595 311.000, 253.595 303.303.141.595 DescriptioniAccaunt Amount Total : 1,349.71 HP SUPPORT RENEWAL FOR SV -E 1,148.33 Total : 1048.33 OFFICE SUPPLIES COMPUTER HARDWARE NON -CAF OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE COMPUTER HARDWARE NON -CAF COMPUTER HARDWARE - NON -C/3 Total : STATE REMITTANCE SIGNS FOR CITY HALL SNOWPLOW EDGES 65.52 55.47 19.93 -27/3 27.73 140.92 33,428.91 Total : 33,428.91 Total : 65.28 Total : 8,775.81 65.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES: COMM. DEV. Tota! : PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Total LIQUID FREEZGARD CI PLUS LIQUID FREEZGARD CI PLUS LIQUID FREEZGARD CI PLUS Total DECEMBER 2017 COPIER COSTS 8,775,81 1,503,60 1,503.60 20:000.00 20,000.00 6,088.56 6.076.12 6,095.67 13,260.35 1,166.89 Total : 1,166.89 0227 -ENGINEERING & ARCHITECT 0253 -ON CALL. SURVEYING 0141 -ENGINEERING & ARCHITECT 750.00 1,800.00 1,000.00 Page: vchlist 01/03/2018 11:10 : 556AM &PI/ Voucher List Page: Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice FundfDept Description/Account Amount 43525 113/2018 000994 000994 SIMPSON ENGINEERS INC. (Continued) Total : 3,550.00 43526 11312018 000230 SPOKANE CO AUDITORS OFFICE DECEMBER 2017 001.058.056.558 RECORDING FEES 702.00 Total : 702.00 43527 113/2018 000308 SPOKANE CO PROSECUTINGATTY NOVEMBER 2017 001.0116.000,589 CRIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION F 485.00 Total : 465.00 43528 1/312018 000459 SPOKANE CO TITLE CO 5-8M5429 311.000.253.595 0253 - PLANT INFO GUARANTEE 978.30 5-SP12428 311.000.248,595 0248 - PLANT INFO GUARANTEE 326.40 5-SP12429 311.000.248.595 0248- PLANT INFO GUARANTEE 326.40 Tota!: 1,631.10 43529 1/312018 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 51504090 43530 1/312018 000093 SPOKESMAN -REVIEW, THE 488062 43531 1/312018 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 3380718870 43532 113/2018 005210 TITAN CHAIN 8. SUPPLY LLC 9642 43533 11312018 000717 TRANSPO GROUP INC. 21197 43534 11312018 006406 TYCO FIRE & SECURITY MGMT INC 41114648 43535 113/2018 000158 WELCH COMER & ASSOC. INC 51043000-008 43536 /13/2018 003210 WEST CONSULTANTS INC, 009818 43537 113/2018 000980 WESTERN SYSTEMS INC 0000034934 001.0116,000,523 DECEMBER 2017 HIOUSING 108,555.55 Total : 108, 555.55 001 013.000.513 ADVERTISINGACCT 42365 1,173.32 Total : 1,173,32 001.076.305.575 OFFICE SUPPLIES: CENTERPLACE 231.15 Total : 231.15 101.000.400.542 TURCK ALLY ROUND TWIST LINK l 1,059.65 Total : 1,059, 65 303.000.259.595 0259-ENG'NEERING SVCS 17,339.56 Total : 17,339, 56 001.090.099.594 LYNX DURESS SYSTEM 15,027.46 Total : 15,027.46 309.000.237.595 16-058: CIP 0237 ENGINEERING S\ 15,091.84 Total : 15,091.84 001.058.055.558 PROFESS[ONAL SERVICES 82.22 Total : 82.22 101.042.000.542 WIRELESS ACCESS POINT, ANTEr 5,885.81 Page: vChIi # 01/03/20118 11:10: 56AM Voucher List Page! Spokane Valley Bank code : apbark Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 43537 1/312018 000980 000980 WESTERN SYSTEMS INC (Continued) Fund/Dept DescriptioniAccount Amount Total : 5:885.81 43538 11312018 002651 WOODARD, ARNE EXPENSES 001.011,000,511 EXPENSE REIMSURSEMEN7 114.50 Total 114.50 3450276 1129/2017 00000"1 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 9290201245 001.016,000.521 LE COt3TRACT BILLING DEOEMBE: 1,469,581.00 Total : 1,469.581.00 44 Vouchers for hank code : aobank Bank total ; 1,889.980,54 44 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 1,889.980.64 1, the undersigned, do certify tinder penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the ser -Aces rendered, or ttie labor performed as described herein and that the Clairn Is just_ due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authen'irate and certify said claire. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed; Mayor Date Counci[ Member Date CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 9, 2018 Department Director Approval : Item: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Payroll for Pay Period Ending December 15, 2017 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: Budget/Financial impacts: Employees Total Gross: $ 274,984.37 $ 274,984.37 Benefits: $ 56,690.98 $ 56,690.98 Total payroll $ 331,675.35 $ 331,675.35 RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to Approve above payroll. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.] STAFF CONTACT: Raba Nimri CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 9, 2018 Department Director Approval : Item: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Payroll for Pay Period Ending December 31, 2017 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: Budget/Financial impacts: Employees Council Total Gross: $ 289,910.19 $ 5,475.00 $ 295,385.19 Benefits: $ 184,702.06 $ 10,405.44 $ 195,107.50 Total payroll $ 474,612.25 $ 15,880.44 $ 490,492.69 RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to Approve above payroll. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.] STAFF CONTACT: Raba Nimri DRAFT MINUTES City of Spokane Valley Special Council Meeting Tuesday, December 12, 2017 4:00 p.m. City of Spokane Valley City Hall, Second Floor Conference Room 10210 E. Sprague Ave., Spokane Valley, Washington Attendance: Spokane Valley Council Mayor Higgins Deputy Mayor Woodard Councilmember Haley Councilmember Peetz Councilmember Pace Councilmember Thompson Councilmember Wood [arrived 4:03 p.m.] Staff Mark Calhoun, City Manager John Hohman, Deputy City Manager Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director Cary Driskell, City Attorney Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney Henry Allen, Senior Engineer Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Legislators: Senator Mike Padden, Representative Bob McCaslin; Representative Matt Shea Others in Attendance: Lobbyist Chelsea Hager, of Gordon Thomas Honeywell Approximately twelve members from the public Mayor Higgins called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present except Councilmember Wood. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to temporarily excuse Councilmember Wood. City Manager Calhoun welcomed everyone and said this is our annual opportunity to communicate Council's legislative agenda to our Legislators; said that during that process, both Briahna Murray and Chelsea Hager of Gordon Thomas Honeywell have been in communication with the three legislators; said the legislative agenda was adopted by Council this fall, and this is an opportunity to discuss those agenda items. 1. Barker Road/BNSF Grade Separation Project. Mr. Hohman distributed copies of two letters from the Washington State Depaitinent of Transportation. Mr. Hohman stated that about this time last year we were looking at this $36 million project with no regional support; that we spent the last year diligently looking at alternatives; said we are working with the consultant team of David Evans and Associates and HDR to go through various alternatives; that we started with five alternatives in collaboration with DOT, and just a few weeks ago we were asked to look at a sixth alternative, for which we have just now received cost information; so we are in the midst of determining what project we will build; he said we gave a presentation last October and will bringing this to Council very shortly. Mr. Hohman said today's focus is the November 13 letter from WSDOT, which highlights the $6 million award for this project from the Federal Highway Program's National Highway Freight Program for fiscal year 2020; and he brought attention to that letter and the highlighted sections on page two and three, and said we are seeking legislators' support, as the letter states: "As a reminder, while our freight plan must account for all of the state's NHFP funding for federal fiscal years 2016-2020, the FFY 2020 funding is still subject to future appropriation by the Legislature;" which he said is repeated on page three of that letter. Mr. Hohman said the current schedule has the design of the project completed in 2018, and Special Council Meeting, State Legislators 12/12/2017 Page 1 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT once we identify exactly the limits of the project from a design standpoint, we want to actively move into the right-of-way acquisition phase to pick up whatever properties to pursue the preferred alternative; and then start construction as soon as the funds are available in 2020. Mr. Hohman said that we started off a year ago with a $36 million project, and through diligently working with various partners including Spokane County, WSDOT, and the SRTC on the alternatives analyses, that has been reduced to just below $19 million; said to -date we have secured along with the $6 million, just below $16 million, which means we are between three and four million below target. Mr. Hohman mentioned that we still have grant applications in to the Federal INFRA and TIGER programs and we hope to hear about that funding next year. Mr. Hohman said staff has considered amending those applications to update them, but were told to leave the applications as they were submitted because if we attempted to make any changes, it could lead to us not being reviewed favorably; and that we can modify those applications later if we receive any funding. Mr. Hohman said staff will continue to look at any other funding possibilities to further close that gap. Mr. Hohman also expressed appreciation to SRTC Executive Director Sabrina Minshall, and to WSDOT Regional Administrator Mike Gribner for their instrumental assistance and support of us obtaining this additional $6 million. Mr. Calhoun said part of the success in getting this project that much closer was the $1.5 million previously appropriated by our legislators; and Senator Padden mentioned it was also a huge help in revising the project and coming up with a more accurate cost, which is almost half the original estimated amount; and mentioned that this is also a critical safety issue. 2. Pass Legislative Responding to Hirst and a 2017-19 Capital Budget: Funding for Appleway Trail Park Amenities In brief, Mr. Calhoun noted that the Hirst decision was regarding water availability in rural areas, and that since the capital budget wasn't passed pending some type of resolution about that Hirst case, and that in that capital budget in both the Senate and the House is a net $540,000 for park related amenities for our Appleway Trail Project between University and Pines, and while the Hirst issue is statewide compared to our local trail project, we recognize both of those issues. Senator Padden stated that they recently saw a list of the number of wells per legislative district, and our district is in the upper third of all districts for the number of wells that could be impacted by this decision. Representative Shea said legislators are hearing that the Hirst issue will be addressed during the early weeks of the session, based on the hearing on that issue which was held in Olympia today; and according to the BIAW (Building Industry Association of Washington) study, this is a $6.9 billion negative economic impact because of this decision which also affects low-income housing; and Senator Padden added that farm worker housing is especially impacted by this decision; and that there will be a property tax shift which has already begun because the valuation of places that have wells is going down, which means people who don't have wells will pay more. Ms. Hager stated that she started her morning in Olympia at the hearing and heard the first half of the hearing before coming out this way, and said there is a new bill under consideration and members of the Senate and House were listening to remarks from the Governor's office, the Department of Ecology, as well as public testimony, and said she feels we are finally seeing some progress on the Hirst issue; and part of the package under consideration is $200 million that would come from the capital budget to go toward water resources and improving the habitat and fish restoration since one of the issues is that there isn't as much water as there was in the past. Senator Padden extended thanks to Council for passing their resolution concerning this issue, and said it was very helpful. 3. Protect the Local State -Shared Revenues Mr. Calhoun stated that in our 2018 budget, we have about $2.1 million of state shared revenues, or about 5% of our recurring revenues; and the two biggest parts of that are the Liquor Board Profits of about $800,000, which were frozen since 2012 so we are hopeful the legislature can find some way to loosen that up; and the other big part is the SST streamlined sales tax mitigation, which for our city amounts to about $570,000 a year. Mr. Calhoun mentioned the Marketplace Fairness Act which was passed in the most recent legislative session, which will phase out the streamlined sales tax mitigation, so we expect that by fall of 2019, that $570,000 a year that we are getting, will phase out down to zero. Mr. Calhoun said in theory we Special Council Meeting, State Legislators 12/12/2017 Page 2 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT will be made whole because there will be more in sales tax revenues, but that is a substantial amount in our city's budget. Mr. Calhoun also mentioned that there is a consortium of cities impacted by this and that first meeting will be held next Friday. Senator Padden asked Ms. Hager if that Marketplace Fairness Act has been legally challenged, and she replied to her knowledge it has not; and said her focus is to ensure that the Department of Revenue and AWC work together that once that Act moves forward, to make sure cities are made whole to make up for that loss of revenue. 4. Protect Businesses by Reforming State Regulatory Burden City Attorney Driskell explained that this item was also on the previous year's legislative agenda; that this acknowledges that the State of Washington has adopted regulations that make it difficult for businesses in Washington to compete with nearby states; such regulations include the B&O tax and the Labor & Industries program; and said this item provides a platform for legislative discussion if an item comes up that would address business regulation reform, and it would allow Council to discuss such issues without the need to amend their legislative agenda. Senator Padden mentioned that he and Representative McCaslin were at a meeting earlier that dealt with problems with the new daycare center requirements. Ms. Hager asked Senator Padden if he would be interested in pursuing some type of legislative fix for that problem, and Senator Padden said that he is new to the K-12 Committee this year, noted that Mr. McCaslin has been working with them for a while and there is some concern with some new requirements for the daycare centers which could drive some of them out of business; and said if legislators can't impact the WAC (Washington Administrative Code) that there could be some legislation to address these concerns. Representative McCaslin agreed that this is a long standing issue, and many daycare centers have closed as a result of regulations and interpretations. 5. Abandoned/Foreclosed Homes Deputy City Attorney Lamb explained that we have an active code enforcement program to address nuisance properties, including junk and junk vehicles; and that a major issue is the "zombie" properties in the midst of foreclosure which are abandoned by the owners because foreclosure is imminent; he said that in the past, the banks had tried to take over ownership and work with us to get the properties cleaned up, keep squatters out and eliminate criminal activity. Mr. Lamb further explained that in 2016, the Supreme Court ruled in Jordan v. Nationstar that the banks cannot do anything until the foreclosure process is complete, which can last several months, which allows squatters to come back, the junk to pile up and the criminal activity to resume; and said we are left in limbo because there is a mix of ownership through the foreclosure process. Mr. Lamb said we have been working with Gordon Thomas Honeywell, and that the banks have been heavily involved with wanting more procedure, as does the community. Mr. Lamb said the City encourages that legislation be adopted in response to the Nationstar case and allow the banks, community and the city to respond to these properties while still protecting the rights of the owner. Senator Padden asked if we have an inventory in our City of the number of these cases, and Mr. Lamb said we have not done an inventory, although he is aware that the City of Spokane brought in an outside company to eventually require registration of foreclosed property which he said is an expensive program, but we do not have such a requirement. Ms. Hager said she feels there will be upcoming draft legislation on this issue and her company will keep our City informed of any bills. Senator Padden asked if there is any discussion about raising that $2,000 lien amount and Ms. Hager said that is not a primary focus with that stakeholder group, although the issue has been raised by Ms. Briahna Murray. Mr. Lamb said we have some abatements each year and that first $2,000 gets in as a priority lien, and the range for our abatements is $1,500 to $2,000; although there are a few properties that could amount from $5,000 to $10,000 to abate. 6. Indigent Defense Funding Mr. Driskell said that in 2013 the State Supreme Court determined that there should be maximum caseloads for public defenders, that caps were set and costs were increased to provide that service; he noted our costs in 2017 were up over 11.4% or $17,000 so we are asking the legislators to consider that impact and rather than have it an unfunded impact, to at least have it partially funded to take that burden off the local Special Council Meeting, State Legislators 12/12/2017 Page 3 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT jurisdictions. Senator Padden said the legislators have looked at this but the unfunded mandate is due to the Supreme Court and despite requests from cities and counties to have some input on the standards, the court refused. Senator Padden said he helped get some legislation through the Senate to have part of these funds go from the Supreme Court's budget to the cities and counties; and he said he has not seen the rationale in how the caseload figure was determined, and agreed it is an unfair situation. Ms. Hager said she and Ms. Murray worked last year to increase the amount of funding that goes to the office of public defense for the purpose of giving grants to cities to improve indigent defense services; and after the new caseload figures became effective, due to traffic fines, an increase of $900,000 was generated annually and that goes to the OPD for those grants; historically it was split counties/cities 90/10, but now it is 50/50; and she said she feels this is one item where we will see forthcoming litigation, as this has been a long priority for the AWC and that it could make its way to the Supreme Court as the state is only funding 5% of indigent defense costs at the county level; and that we will likely see a coordinated effort among cities and counties in the next few years to try to find efficiencies to reduce costs. Representative Shea added that he feels there will be discussions in the judiciary committee, particularly in the House, on the way that indigency is determined. 7. Support Continued Prohibition of Recreational Marijuana Home Growing Deputy City Attorney Lamb explained that last year as part of some amendments to various marijuana regulations, the legislature directed the Liquor and Cannabis Board (LCB) to conduct a study and report on the feasibility of allowing home grown recreational marijuana within the confines of what is referred to as the Cole memo, which is the Department of Justice memo outlining how states where marijuana is legal, that the Department of Justice will not prosecute anyone provided that states have regulations that are effective on paper and that they do not allow criminal activity, guns, access to minors, etc; and the LCB asked for input from the stakeholders; he said the City went through a review process at the staff level, Council provided input, and we ultimately provided comments on the study. Mr. Lamb said it comes down to marijuana is a local issue in terms of local impacts including any crime and law enforcement that may be associated with marijuana. Mr. Lamb said the LCB's report provided three options: a vigorous enforcement or regulatory regime at the state level, a local option, and a continued prohibition; and said we would support the continued prohibition, which is the most effective way to meet the Cole memo; as that would limit youth access as well as additional criminal activity, so we would support that option. 8. Protecting Parental Rights Regarding Decisions Involving Their Children Mr. Driskell noted that over the last six months our Council and community have had some discussions over parental rights and what role the City might have in that regard; and the Council decided that rather than have a conflict with existing state laws, that the more appropriate way would be to point out to the legislators, Council and the community's concerns, and the importance that parental rights have, and ask that the legislature be mindful when it looks to adopt legislation, so as not to unintentionally infringe on those rights, and also consider past enactments whether at the agency or legislative level, and perhaps take another look at those. Attorney Driskell said this is not advocating for any particular change but just a general platform to ask legislators that when they are considering legislation to please be mindful of this important issue. Senator Padden said he thinks there are bills that will come up and he is aware of some; one that has come up before concerns supporting grandparents' visitation rights; but the question is, do you pass a law giving grandparents rights over parents. City Manager Calhoun said that concludes the items on the agenda, and he asked if anyone wanted to speak further on any issue, and mentioned that at tonight's Council meeting, Ms. Hager will be giving a presentation concerning the legislature and what we might expect in the next session. Councilmember Thompson said that the Board of Health passed a resolution to support raising the age to buy tobacco, to age 21, and they are asking other jurisdictions to support that proposal. Senator Padden said this has come up before but the question of the military comes into play, since they are fighting for our country, and some Special Council Meeting, State Legislators 12/12/2017 Page 4 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT don't like the idea then of telling them they can't buy cigarettes. Representative McCaslin said he also thinks the 21 age will be difficult to sell to the legislators. Representative Shea mentioned the Barker Road project and the design for a two-lane round -about in the middle of Trent; he said it is his understanding that a two-lane round -about with a number of potential conflict points would violate the safety standards that are typically looked at when putting in a round -about; but instead, a round -about with an on and off ramp is usually a lot safer and makes more sense un terms of traffic flow; said he spoke to Mike Gribner at the DOT and thinks that is something to look at in the future. Senator Padden said sometimes round -abouts are great, but are not the solution to all problems; and speed would be a key factor there. Mr. Hohman said that as part of the phase 2 designs, they are looking at alternatives now; that phase 2 will begin with an evaluation of a signal versus a round -about; said they have done some of the traffic modeling on the round -about to make sure that it will physically work there; and it does work but said they need to do that intersection control analysis that has not yet been completed. Mr. Hohman said he has many discussions with DOT about the alternatives, and they are leaning more toward the round -about in this location; that it is their facility and one of the things they have pointed out is that signals at intersections are not accident free; and they show the US 2 Flint Road light that went in a couple of years ago; and prior to the installation of the signal they would average three accidents per year, and after the installation of the signal, they were up to 27. Representative Shea said he feels having a round -about with the off and on ramp would take of both issues into consideration instead of leaving it right on Trent. Mr. Hohman noted staff will continue examining this project. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 4:47 p.m. ATTEST: L.R. Higgins, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Special Council Meeting, State Legislators 12/12/2017 Page 5 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT MINUTES City of Spokane Valley City Council Regular Meeting Formal Meeting Format Tuesday, December 12, 2017 Mayor Higgins called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Attendance: Rod Higgins, Mayor Arne Woodard, Deputy Mayor Pam Haley, Councilmember Ed Pace, Councilmember Brandi Peetz, Councilmember Linda Thompson, Councilmember Sam Wood, Councilmember Staff Mark Calhoun, City Manager Cary Driskell, City Attorney Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney Henry Allen, Senior Engineering Morgan Koudelka, Sr. Admin. Analyst John Hohman, Deputy City Manager John Pietro, Administrative Analyst Bill Helbig, City Engineer John Whitehead, Human Resources Manager Mark Werner, Police Chief Carolbelle Branch, Public Information Officer Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk INVOCATION: Pastor Brad Bruszer of Genesis Church gave the invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Council, staff, and members of the audience stood for the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present. APPROVAL OF AGENDA It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the agenda. INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS n/a COMMITTEE, BOARD, LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS Councilmember Thompson: reported that she attended a Board of Health meeting where they passed a resolution in support of raising the legal age to buy tobacco to 21 and said she will bring this up again later in our agenda. Councilmember Haley: said she attended two committee meetings this week on the STA (Spokane Transit Authority) operations; went to the Visit Spokane Holiday House; attended a ribbon cutting ceremony for the grand opening of the Ice Ribbon at Riverfront Park, and said they had the Lilac City ice skaters come skate, and it was a very nice opening. Councilmembers Pace, Peetz and Wood had no report. Deputy Mayor Woodard: said he attended come Chamber of Commerce ribbon cuttings, including the CHAS opening on Indiana; went to the open house at Visit Spokane; attended the Spokane Valley exit audit last Friday and said everything is fine; went to a Government Affairs Committee with the Chamber and said they are trying to finalize their legislative agenda and have incorporated parts of ours into theirs; and met with our State Legislators and lobbyist here this afternoon. MAYOR'S REPORT Mayor Higgins reported that he attended the Naval Reserve Change of Command; went to the Liberty Lake Fire Station Ribbon Cutting; said Spokane Regional Clean Air Board is working through some regulations Minutes Regular Council Meeting: 12-12-2017 Page 1 of 6 Approved by Council: DRAFT dealing with regulating agricultural grows; mentioned the state auditor and the exit audit last Friday and read a brief excerpt from that report showing a "clean opinion" and he congratulated Finance Director Taylor and her staff on a job well done. PROCLAMATION In Appreciation of S.C.O.P.E. After Mayor Higgins read the proclamation in appreciation of S.C.O.P.E., Director Scott accepted the proclamation with thanks; he mentioned some of the S.C.O.P.E. volunteers are here tonight, and he thanked them for their support throughout the years, as well as the support of the Spokane Valley Police Department; and said the goal is community safety, and that they can always use more volunteers, and said tonight's proclamation is an honor and he again thanked Council on behalf of the volunteers and the Board of Directors. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mayor Higgins explained the process, and then invited public comment. Mr. Tim Lape, Spokane Valley: said he attended the legislative meeting earlier and seems that Legislative Agenda was adopted prior to the three new Councilmembers being seated; said that should be a product of the Council that will have to deal with the legislature during their term and he recommends any action on that legislative agenda be delayed until the new Councilmembers have an opportunity to put their ideas into it; said they may or may not agree with this or could have new items to include; and that working from an old City Council agenda doesn't speak well in representing new Councilmembers. Ms. Carol Allen, Spokane Valley: said she understands the health policy for Councilmembers differs from full time employees; said she feels it is important for the community to understand how those policies differ from one another, and whether one policy provides more benefits than others; she also stated that as a nurse educator, she asked Council not to talk about nurses being trained; she said nurses aren't trained they are educated. Ms. Laura Rentz, Spokane: said she represents the Northwest Service Dog Alliance; that she spoke with Councilmembers Pace and Wood on previous occasions and they have given her many fantastic ideas and her organization is now a nonprofit organization; said she appreciated partnering with community leaders, and she wanted to present the Council and the individual Councilmembers with an award of excellence for their time concerning her organization. Ms. Paula Smith, Spokane Valley: said she attended last Thursday's Spokane Regional Health Department meeting and they passed their legislative agenda, which she read (in part): "protect the public from communicable diseases by increasing immunization rates including through restrictions on exemptions to immunization requirements;" said she would expect that to be on their agenda, but to do that in a way of pushing to take away exemptions would be going against what Council passed on their legislative agenda concerning parental rights; said she just wanted to make sure Council was aware that was on their agenda so if they do aggressively start fighting that, said she would expect that our city would be fighting against them on that issue. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed fee Resolution 17-019 — Chelsie Taylor Mayor Higgins opened the public hearing at 6:24 p.m., and invited Finance Director Taylor to explain the proposed fee resolution. Director Taylor said based on changes to the public records act, and as we are making changes based on that act, a public hearing on our fees is required; said she asked each department to review their section and send any proposed changes to her; and she briefly explained the proposed changes in Parks and Recreation, changes initiated by the City Attorney's office, administrative copy fees in association with the aforementioned Public Records Act, false alarm recovery fee changes to comply with Ordinance 17-001 which eliminated the registration fees, and other minor wording changes. Mayor Higgins invited public comment; no comments were offered and Mayor Higgins closed the public hearing at 6:29 p.m. Minutes Regular Council Meeting: 12-12-2017 Page 2 of 6 Approved by Council: DRAFT la. Resolution 17-019 Fee Resolution — Chelsie Taylor It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded to approve Resolution 17-019 amending the Master Fee Schedule for 2018. Since the public hearing on this was just held, no comments were solicited. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. 2. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. Proposed Motion: I move to approve the Consent Agenda. a. Approval of claim vouchers on Dec 12, 2017 Request for Council Action Form, Total: 3,378,686.05 b. Approval of Payroll for Pay Period ending November 15, 2017: $372,952.27 c. Approval of Payroll for Pay Period ending November 30, 2017: $402,131.65 d. Approval of November 14, 2017 Council Meeting Minutes, regular Formal Format e. Approval of November 21, 2017 Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session Format It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the Consent Agenda. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: 3. Legislative Update — Mark Calhoun; and Chelsea Hager of Gordon Thomas Honeywell City Manager Calhoun introduced Ms. Chelsea Hager, Consultant with Gordon Thomas Honeywell Governmental Affairs, who will give a review of the recent legislative session. Ms. Hager went through her PowerPoint presentation explaining when the session starts, the makeup of House and Senate members, and that it is currently a Democratic -controlled Legislature. She briefly addressed the McCleary decision concerning funding for education, and said that this will be the second year of the two-year cycle which means less budget opportunities. Ms. Hager went over a list of recent years' successes such as funding for the Appleway Trail and Greenacres Park, changes in the marijuana lounge regulations, and the nuisance abatement cost recovery. Ms. Hager said this session will be challenging and she encouraged members of Council to travel to Olympia for hearings, to send consistent messages to the legislators, and to make phone calls and send emails when requested as there is of course, no guarantee of success. Ms. Hager mentioned the session begins January 8, the AWC City Action Days are scheduled for January 24 through 25; and the end of the regular session will be March 8, 2018. Council thanked Ms. Hager for her report tonight as well as her input in the earlier meeting today. NEW BUSINESS: 4. Resolution 17-020 Updating Insurance and Health Related benefits — John Whitehead Human Resources Manager Whitehead explained that this was brought to Council at last week's study session when he spoke of the change the Association of Washington Cities is making, to be effective January, 2018, and which eliminates two health plans so this resolution reflects those changes. Mr. Whitehead mentioned there are also changes consistent with past decisions of Council; he said the proposed resolution includes the eligibility for Councilmembers to participate in a health reimbursement arrangement account with contributions that are equal to the deductible for the plan chosen and the number of persons covered on that plan. Mr. Whitehead said that staff would like to amend section 7 to strike references to city employees in that section. Deputy Mayor Woodard asked if the amendment is because we already have it for employees, and Mr. Whitehead said we do already have it for those employees and their benefits are specifically laid out in the agreement between the exclusive bargaining representative. It was then moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded to approve as modified, Resolution 17-020 specifying insurance plans and health related benefits for Councilmembers and staff. Councilmember Pace said, for the sake of the citizen who asked about the health plan, what are the differences, if any, between the health benefits that Councilmembers get and the health benefits that City staff gets. Mr. Whitehead said this change brings together Council and city employees on to the same plans. Councilmember Thompson said she appreciates that there is the Employee Assistance Program as part of the coverage, and she appreciates that our Human Resources Department has done a great job to make sure Minutes Regular Council Meeting: 12-12-2017 Page 3 of 6 Approved by Council: DRAFT we have counselling availability; that it is a good benefit and helps reduce the stigma of needing help; and Mr. Whitehead agreed it is an excellent benefit. Mayor Higgins invited public comments. Mr. Tim Lape, Spokane Valley: said he thinks all of our citizens should have affordable health care and insurance; said he has a problem with this resolution in that be believes that all city employees, whether Councilmembers or other full time employees, should have the exact same heath care and insurance coverage; said he doesn't think anyone runs for a council position hoping they get 100% Cadillac health care insurance; said Councilmembers are part-time employees, and for the Council to approve themselves 100% Cadillac health insurance coverage where full-time employees have less health care insurance coverage, is wrong. Mayor Higgins asked if Mr. Whitehead would care to address Mr. Lape's comments. Mr. Whitehead said that the City has a collection of five plans which are offered to city employees and Councilmembers, and the benefits in those plans are the same depending on which plan they choose; said there is a cost share that is built into employees on those plans, but the plan coverages are the same. Ms. Carol Allen, Spokane Valley: she said in reading the material, that the City shall provide 100% of the premium of either health plan for Councilmembers, and 80% of the premium increases in addition to the amount the City pays, so they may have the same plan, but they don't have the same costs. Mr. Whitehead stated that the plans are the same as far as the health coverage, and will be as of 2018, but through labor negotiations we negotiated a cost share with employees, so you'll see a difference there but the plans are the same. There were no further comments. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. 5. Motion Consideration: CenterPlace West Lawn MasterPlan — Mike Stone It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded to approve the CenterPlace West Lawn MasterPlan. Director Stone briefly went over the materials explaining the plan. There was brief discussion about potential safety problems near the north meadow, and comment from Mr. Stone that we will be able to assess any safety problems once the area is completed and landscaped. Mayor Higgins invited public comment. Nina Fluegal, Spokane Valley: asked about extra parking to accommodate all those people. Deputy Mayor Woodard mentioned that without a master plan, we can't get grants, and noted that we are starting to see private individuals ask about contributions for projects. Concerning parking, Mr. Stone said the area has almost 400 parking spots and to date, parking has been adequate. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. 6. Motion Consideration: Police Precinct Lease Agreement — John Pietro It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the Precinct Lease Amendment. Mr. Pietro briefly explained the reasons for the lease agreement, to extend the term of the lease, and to formally recognize the County's use of 15% of our building as opposed to 44%. Mayor Higgins invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. 7. Motion Consideration: Commute Trip Education Interlocal Approval — Morgan Koudelka It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the Interlocal Agreement Between Spokane County and the City of Spokane Valley regarding Commute Trip Reduction implementation. Mr. Koudelka briefly explained the Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) program, and of our participation in that program; he mentioned that incentives to encourage participation had been proven very successful and increased participation, but he learned last year that those funds cannot be used for that purpose, so there are now no funding for incentives, which he said, resulted in reduction in participation. Mr. Koudelka said that the County has asked all local contributors to contribute some funds for those incentives, that our share would be a few hundred dollars, and that Mr. Calhoun has agreed to contribute that for one year and then get some data to see if it was successful, and to give the County time to try to secure other funding to re-establish that incentive funding program, which Mr. Minutes Regular Council Meeting: 12-12-2017 Page 4 of 6 Approved by Council: DRAFT Koudelka said is separate from this agreement. Mayor Higgins invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. 8. Motion Consideration: Solid Waste Drip Box Contract Deputy City Attorney Lamb said that there have been a few minor modifications to the contracts since the December 5 meeting as staff and the contractors have finalized contract negotiations. Mr. Lamb mentioned that section 3.1.10 addresses recyclables and obvious contaminants and said the previous rate was in the main contract, but the desire was to keep it all self-contained; he said if the hauler has to pick it up as garbage, that $10.00 rate has been included in the contract's Attachment B, which was the same rate as in the main contract. Mr. Lamb said the second change deals with notices in section 6 which had referenced he old city hall; and the third change is in section 7.1 Collection Right; he said previously that stated this was a general non-exclusive contract, which wasn't what the RFP (request for proposal) provided for; said this contract recognizes those who went through the effort, and is a ten-year contract with a limited universe of other competitors; so now there is a provision for two, non-exclusive contractors; that default occurs and we need to bring in another to replace them, it limits it to two to maintain competitiveness; he said that as noted in 7.1, if an emergency exits, we could go outside two providers if they weren't able to meet that need; but Mr. Lamb noted that even during the 2015 windstorm, we would not have had a need to invoke that provision. Mayor Higgins invited public comment. Ms. Nina Fluegal: asked about Waste Management and using all the same garbage cans; asked when does that happen and that it would be nice to have uniformity. Mr. Lamb said that is provided for in the main contract which was approved last May for residential pickup; that Council selected the universal carts and that takes effect April 1, 2018 so there will be uniformity; but tonight's contract is for drop box services, and the large containers don't have a uniformity provision. There were no further public comments. a. — Contract with Sunshine Disposal It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the contract with Sunshine Disposal, Inc. for comprehensive drop -box contained collection services in substantially the form as presented. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. b. — Contract with Waste Management It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the contract with Waste Management for comprehensive drop -box contained collection services in substantially the form as presented. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mayor Higgins explained the process, and then invited public comment. Ms. Peggy Doering: spoke about nuisances and of RVs parked on the street; said she and her husband have seen four RVs that use their street through the summer and fall; she said the RVs have expanded sides, stairs, electrical cords, and said there is also a reasonable amount of concern they could be used as off-site storage. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: 9. Nuisances (yard sales, properties) — Cary Driskell, Erik Lamb Mr. Driskell and Mr. Lamb went through their PowerPoint explaining proposed Municipal Code revisions dealing with nuisances including information on our current provisions, how a case is initiated and subsequent steps, along with minor and substantive revisions. They also talked about chronic nuisances, noise and odor complaints associated with animal keeping, yard sales, and camping/residing in motorhomes located on the public right-of-way as well as on private property. There was some discussion about chronic nuisances and the possibility of a homeowner losing their home, with Mr. Driskell explaining that such outcome would not automatically occur and would likely take six months as the owner, Mr. Driskell's Minutes Regular Council Meeting: 12-12-2017 Page 5 of 6 Approved by Council: DRAFT office, and law enforcement would work to mitigate the problem. While Councilmember Wood said he felt such action might be too harsh or rash, Councilmember Pace said all one need do is talk with the neighbors who are tired of such criminal activity; he said he thinks people will like it but the criminals won't. Deputy Mayor Woodard agreed such action might be rash, but said we can't afford to have these types of activities continue. Mr. Driskell asked Council if they would entertain a motion concerning whether to continue exploring the issue of nuisances relating to urban animal keeping. After further discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Wood and seconded to leave the animal code the way it is today. Mayor Higgins invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Mayor Higgins, Deputy Mayor Woodard, and Councilmembers Thompson, Haley, Peetz and Wood. Opposed: Councilmember Pace. Motion carried. Deputy City Attorney Lamb discussed other noise complaints, specifically as shown on slide 18, that staff recommends in this instance, SVMC 7.05.040(L), to list the entire regulation for clarity, and to add to the state requirements, to exempt organized activities at public parks, playgrounds, swimming pools, schools, etc., during hours of operation, which will exempt things like high-school football games, marching band practice, etc. Council agreed. Concerning yard sales, Attorney Driskell asked if Council was interested in bringing this back for further discussion to include a total cap for the number of yard sales permitted. Councilmembers nodded in agreement. Council also nodded in agreement, as noted on slide #20, to consider prohibiting camping in motorhomes in the rights-of-way. Deputy City Lamb noted likely the more correct term would be "living" and not camping; and said there has been a large increase in the number of complaints about people living in an RV on someone else's property; said there are numerous issues dealing with such activity including the possibility of people squatting and other illegal activity; inadequate fire protection, electricity, water, and means to dispose human waste; and that an RV is not designed for permanent living. Mr. Lamb said staff would like to modify the Code for a clear solution, as currently all that someone need do is simply say they are not living in the RV, then move out and come back later and start the process all over again. Mr. Driskell asked if Council is amenable to looking at a creative approach to address this, and they nodded in agreement. 10. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins Councilmember Thompson asked that Council examine the idea of support to the idea of changing the age to 21 for purchase of tobacco; that she would also like to connect with our young people and encourage them to engage with city government so would like to explore ideas about youth activities to start growing young leaders. Mr. Calhoun asked for Council consensus on these items and Council agreed to add them to the advance agenda. As a side note, Deputy Mayor Woodard mentioned the Wreaths Across America ceremony will be held this Saturday, noon at the Pines Cemetery. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: Mr. Calhoun reminded Council and the community that the December 26 Council meeting has been cancelled. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 8:19 p.m. ATTEST: L.R. Higgins, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Minutes Regular Council Meeting: 12-12-2017 Page 6 of 6 Approved by Council: DRAFT Attendance: Councilmembers MINUTES SPOKANE VALLEY COUNCIL MEETING STUDY SESSION Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers Spokane Valley, Washington December 19, 2017 Staff Rod Higgins, Mayor Arne Woodard, Deputy Mayor Pam Haley, Councilmember Ed Pace, Councilmember Brandi Peetz, Councilmember Linda Thompson, Councilmember Sam Wood, Councilmember Mark Calhoun City Manager Cary Driskell, City Attorney Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney John Hohman, Deputy City Manager Lori Barlow, Senior Planner Mike Stone, Parks & Rec Director Gloria Mantz, Engineering Manager Bill Helbig, City Engineer Marty Palaniuk, Planner Mark Werner, Police Chief Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Mayor Higgins called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll, all Councilmembers were present. ACTION ITEMS: 1. CONSENT AGENDA: consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. Proposed Motion: I move to approve the Consent Agenda. a. Approval of claim vouchers on Dec 19, 2017 Request for Council Action Form Total: $2,894,610.49 b. Approval of December 5, 2017 Council Meeting Minutes, Study Session It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the Consent Agenda. 2.Motion Consideration: Change Order Euclid Ave. Reconstruction Project—Gloria Mantz, Craig Aldworth It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded to authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute Change Order No. 8 to MDM Construction in the amount of $17,766.46. Engineering Manager Mantz explained the background of the project and the previous change orders, of the amounts the City pays and the County pays, and that the purpose of tonight's change order is to pay for work needed to temporarily open Euclid Road to the public during the winter suspension, and grant thirteen and a half working days for the winter suspension. Mayor Higgins invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. NON -ACTION ITEMS: 3. Open Space Requirements for Residential Projects in Mixed Use Zones — Lori Barlow Senior Planner Barlow explained that this came up as a request from Councilmember Wood to discuss section 19.70.050(g) of our City code dealing with the open space requirements for residential projects in mixed use zones. Ms. Barlow explained that the open space requirement in the mixed use zone has been in existence since 2007 with essentially the same language; she mentioned that part of the requirement states that projects with residential components shall provide 210 sq. ft. of open space per dwelling unit; that the requirement does not apply to development of less than ten new dwelling units and does not apply to residential development located within 1,300 feet of a public park, and that a fee in lieu of land dedication Council Study Session: 12-19-2017 Page 1 of 3 Approved by Council: DRAFT may be assessed for the development of public parks but that option has never been used. Via her PowerPoint she explained what types of uses trigger the requirement, what zones permit residential uses, exceptions to the open space requirement, and our standard compared with the City of Spokane, Spokane County, and Liberty Lake. Deputy Mayor Woodard asked if Council were to make a major change and take out the 210 sq. ft. or fee in lieu of requirement, would this have to go before the Planning Commission. Ms. Barlow said this has not been to the Planning Commission, but if Council direction is for a text amendment, it would follow that process and go to the Commission. Ms. Barlow also noted that we do not have anything in place to dictate how a "fee in lieu of" would occur or be implemented. Deputy Mayor Woodard said he would like to see this go to the Planning Commission and get some input from the public and developers. Councilmember Wood said that he and Councilmember Pace met regularly and went through the City Code and building regulations, and came across this; that although 210 sq. ft. is a small amount, they didn't see the benefit; said he contacted the Home Builders and they would like to see this go away as they don't like the restrictions; and he would also like to see this go before the Planning Commission. Councilmember Thompson said she would also like to see more study on this and get more information, as she feels we need more open space; and she would like to explore that and have this go through the process. There was Council consensus to move this through the Planning Commission. 4. Shipping Containers — Marty Palaniuk Planner Palaniuk went through his PowerPoint presentation explaining about shipping containers, the proposed regulations, and the outcome of the Planning Commission's study, public hearing, and findings, in that they voted six to one to recommend that Council not make the amendment. Mr. Palaniuk mentioned that the Commission discussion included the requirement to place the container on paved surface, whether there was a public need, building permits for structural changes to the containers, and the industry standards to ensure safe containers; and he mentioned some of the Commission's Findings, including that there is no industry certification, containers may be contaminated or hazardous to the public and the environment, and that the previous container content and use cannot be verified. Councilmember Wood asked who the one vote was on the Planning Commission, and it was mentioned that was Commissioner Phillips, and that the minutes were included in tonight's Council packet, and Councilmember Wood said he would also look up that information. Councilmember Haley asked for confirmation that the Commission vote was six against moving the regulations forward, and one vote not to move it forward, and Mr. Lamb acknowledged that was correct. Except for Councilmember Pace, there was Council consensus to not move this forward. 5. Small Cell Regulations — Cary Driskell, Erik Lamb Via his PowerPoint presentation, Deputy City Attorney Lamb explained about the proposed small cell deployment regulations, including an explanation of existing laws, and briefly explaining small cell technology; and said if we were to move ahead with implementing this, it would be via a franchise agreement, which would come to Council in the form of an ordinance. City Attorney Driskell stated that he has been working with Verizon and are almost in total agreement to bring a draft franchise forward, which would set out how to do what they want to do in our rights-of-way. Mr. Lamb added that some cities have a long process and require each structure to have a permit, but we would recommend thirty sites per permit. Councilmember Wood asked about snow covering those boxes on the ground, and whether we would have any liability. Mr. Driskell said he assumes the boxes are waterproof; that it is the right-of-way and there are meters on the ground now, so it hasn't been an issue and feels we would not have any liability. There was Council consensus to move this forward to the Planning Commission. 6. Unfit Dwellings — Cary Driskell, Erik Lamb Deputy City Attorney Lamb went through the PowerPoint presentation explaining about unfit dwellings and our City code enforcement issues dealing with public nuisances; and that with state law chapter 38.80 RCW, which relates solely to unfit dwellings, buildings and structures, that provision allows the City to recover all costs of abatement as a priority lien of equal rank with state and local taxes; he showed some photos of examples of unfit dwellings, and went over the required procedures as stated in RCW 35.80.030. Councilmember Haley asked who would enforce this ordinance and Mr. Lamb explained that this would go through the code enforcement division, with the building official signing off on the complaint; and that Council Study Session: 12-19-2017 Page 2 of 3 Approved by Council: DRAFT the fire department or code enforcement would likely make us aware of these structures. City Attorney Driskell added that to address code compliance, we can only do what our code says we can do, and throughout time, we have found gaps; said these nuisances can represent a substantial investment to abate but with this ordinance, we could actually recover costs for fixing a problem, which helps us help the neighborhood. There was Council consensus for staff to move this forward for a first ordinance reading. 7. Police Department Monthly Report — Chief Werner Chief Werner went over some of the highlights of his monthly report, again extending thanks to S.C.O.P.E. for their great effort, and thanking Council for recognizing S.C.O.P.E. last week with a proclamation. Chief Werner mentioned that various scams are continuing, and he reminded the public if someone calls for banking information or to fix your computer that you have not previously contacted, it is a scam, and he cautioned members of the public not to give out important banking information, or purchase gift cards in response to these scams. Chief Werner also noted that the property crimes unit has been extremely busy over the last week weeks and issued numerous search warrants, made numerous arrests and charged about twenty-seven people with over 500 charges, including fraud, vehicle theft, and other crimes. Councilmember Thompson asked if he is seeing an increase in packages being stolen off people's porches, and he replied that it has been occurring, but there has not necessarily been an increase. 8. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins There were no suggested changes to the Advance Agenda. 9. Department Reports These were for information only and were not reported or discussed. 10. Council Check-in — Mayor Higgins Councilmember Pace mentioned that as tonight is his last Council meeting, he wanted to thank everybody; said it was a privilege to serve the City and he thoroughly enjoyed his term, and is proud of his term and of his perfect attendance; and he thanked staff for doing a great job of running the City; and ended by wishing the new Councilmembers all the best, and encouraging Council to keep up the good work. Deputy Mayor Woodard applauded the public for their work on clearing the sidewalks of snow, particularly the Safe Routes to School; and applauded the plows for their work as well; and also extended thanks to Councilmember Pace for his service. Mayor Higgins wished everyone a merry Christmas, and said Council will return January 2. 11. City Manager Comments — Mark Calhoun City Manager Calhoun reminded everyone that there is no Council meeting next Tuesday, December 26, and the next meeting will be January 2, at the regular 6 p.m. time, but on that same day at 5 p.m., we will have the swearing in of the five new Councilmembers. Mr. Calhoun also acknowledged Councilmember Pace's last meeting; said Mr. Pace was successful in the election of 2013 and served a four-year period from 2014 through 2017, and served on the Finance Committee, Governance Manual Committee, Wastewater Policy Advisory Board, the STA (Spokane Transit Authority) Board, the Health Board, and SRTC (Spokane Regional Transportation Council), so he has been a very busy man and was fully engaged in his role. Mr. Calhoun said it has been a pleasure working with Mr. Pace and will miss his dry sense of humor; he presented Mr. Pace with a commemorative plaque and everyone thanked him for his service. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 7:29 p.m. ATTEST: , Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Council Study Session: 12-19-2017 Page 3 of 3 Approved by Council: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 9, 2018 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ['admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First Reading — Proposed Ordinance No. 18-001 regarding chronic nuisances and updating chapters 7.05, 17.100, 17.110, and Appendix "A" SVMC related to nuisances. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Chapter 7.05 SVMC; chapter 17.100 SVMC; chapter 17.110 SVMC; Appendix "A" SVMC; chapter 7.48 RCW. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adoption of chapter 7.05 SVMC, relating to nuisances, in 2003; amended in 2005, 2006, 2008, 2012, and 2017. Chapter 17.100, relating to enforcement, was recodified in its entirety in 2016 as part of the Comprehensive Plan update with minor changes. City Council heard an administrative report on the proposed changes on December 12, 2017. BACKGROUND: The City adopted chapter 7.05 SVMC relating to nuisance properties shortly after becoming a city in 2003. The most common types of nuisances we have dealt with over the years have involved accumulations of trash, junk vehicles, and accumulations of broken machinery or equipment. Less frequently, we deal with other types of nuisance violations such as illegal structures, encroachments on sidewalks (vegetation, debris), fire hazards, noise, dust, graffiti, and excessive yard sales. Chapter 17.100 SVMC contains the administrative enforcement provisions for the Code, including nuisances and various land use violations. Chapter 17.110 involves fees and penalties, including fees related to appealing code enforcement violations. The City has altered and refined the nuisance provisions over the years to make them more effective, or to address new items as appropriate. The current Code Enforcement Officer is Nicole Montano, who recently joined us from Spokane County Regional Animal Protection Services (SCRAPS). On average, the City handles 330 new compliance cases annually. Of that number, the Office of the City Attorney has been forwarded an average of 30 cases per year since 2013 to pursue potential legal action. A nuisance case may be initiated in one of several ways, including observation by City staff, on referral from another agency, or through receipt of information from citizens. When Ms. Montano initiates a code compliance investigation, she will generally engage in the following process: - visit the property in person to determine whether there is a likely violation; - if so, attempt to make contact with the owner or occupant in an effort to get compliance through the easiest means possible, voluntary compliance; - if it cannot be cleaned up immediately, a warning notice would then likely be issued to provide specific information on the nature of the violation, as well as what is necessary to cure it including applicable timeframes; - most people are interested in executing a Voluntary Compliance Agreement (VCA) with the City, which spells out what will be done, including timeframes, to come into compliance. Successful completion of the terms of the VCA results in suspension of the penalty; Page 1 of 4 - staff would follow up after the time for compliance in the warning notice had expired. If the violation was taken care of, the City would issue a letter to that effect; - if the violation had not been eliminated, the City would issue a Notice and Order, which if not appealed, assesses a minimum penalty of $500 and identifies the time by which the violation must be abated by the property owner or occupant; - if the Notice and Order is not appealed, and the violation not cleaned up, then the case would get referred to the Office of the City Attorney for further enforcement action; - the Office of the City Attorney attempts to contact violators as well in an effort to get compliance instead of filing suit in Superior Court. If we are successful, then the City will issue a letter that the property is in compliance; - if we don't get a sufficient response, we file suit and seek an abatement order from the Court which will order the owner/occupant to remove the violations and, if they fail to do so, authorize the City to enter the property after 20 days to abate the violation. After such an abatement, the City is authorized to get a lien against the property in the full amount, however only the first $2,000 of that amount is a high priority lien on par with County and municipal taxes. We generally have to wait until the property transfers before we get paid the rest of the money we spent on abatement. There are some cases where the City never gets paid, however, the City was able to assist the neighborhood in removing a blight that was likely reducing their property values. Staff has become aware of the need to consider several revisions to chapters 7.05 and 17.100 SVMC. In addition to substantive revisions, staff looked at both entire chapters in an attempt to update language as appropriate, or correct minor issues that may exist and make the language more accurate. Staff discussed six substantive issues with City Council at its December 12, 2017 meeting. The issues and points of discussion from Council are as follows: (1) Chronic Nuisances. This would add provisions for chronic nuisance properties. Chronic nuisances involve numerous, on-going criminal activities, including search warrants, arrest warrants, active commission of crimes such as drug crimes, burglary, etc. These impacts occur not only on the subject property, but also for blocks around in the form of residential burglary, car prowling, vehicle theft, graffiti, and vandalism. We worked with Spokane County to draft new provisions to address these chronic nuisance properties. We would rely primarily on our Police Department, staffed by the Spokane County Sheriff's Office, to provide the relevant background information on chronic criminal activity for certain properties. Staff from the County, Sheriffs Office, and Spokane Valley agreed it would be helpful to use a very similar approach across the two jurisdictions since Deputies would be doing the bulk of the evidence gathering to support pursuing these types of cases. The proposed new Code provisions define what kind of criminal activity qualifies as a chronic nuisance, but specifically excludes domestic violence charges so we don't re -victimize the victims of domestic violence. If a property has either four qualifying criminal events, plus at least one regular nuisance (garbage, junk vehicles, noise, etc) in a 12 month period, we would be able to proceed with imposing this violation. Alternatively, if a property has five qualifying criminal acts in a 12 month period, we would be able to proceed. If Spokane County Superior Court agrees that it meets the criteria, we would seek an abatement order from the Court that precludes the bad behavior, and can include an order that the premises be vacated for up to one year by the owner or occupant if lesser remedies are insufficient. Page 2 of 4 Council gave consensus to include the proposed chronic nuisance provisions in the proposed ordinance for first reading. (2) Noise and odors relating to urban animal keeping. The Council and Planning Commission have engaged in considerable discussion about urban animal keeping. One of the impacts of these activities is increased noise and odors for neighboring properties. Increasing the number and types of animals allowed in an urban environment will undoubtedly result in increased complaints from adjoining properties about increased noise, increased odor, loose animals, and likely flies. This is not to say that these impacts should be the determinative factor for the Council on whether it moves ahead with expanding the areas where such animals will be allowed, including the types and numbers allowed, but it should be at least part of the Council's consideration. The City of Spokane expanded its urban animal keeping in recent years. They report that this has resulted in increased calls for service by their code compliance office to deal with issues like noise, odor, setback of pens from property lines, etc. These impacts are separate from dealing with animals on the loose, which Spokane contracts with SCRAPS to handle. This is a separate contract from Spokane's contract regarding dogs and cats, and Spokane Valley would need to enter into a separate contract with SCRAPS as well to respond to animals other than dogs and cats that are loose. At the December 12, 2017 meeting, Council moved to keep the current animal keeping regulations. The motion passed 6-1. With this motion, no changes were made to odor and noise provisions related to urban animal keeping. (3) Other noise complaints. There are several additional items relating to noise staff wanted to bring to Council's attention. Primarily, this amendment would bring our Code in line with the statutory requirements, with a minor addition, and state the requirements directly in our Code rather than relying on a citation to state law without including all of the language. The additional provision (SVMC 7.05.040(L)(2)(o) relates to an issue that has come up several times involving calls from neighbors of schools where events occur outdoors that generate significant noise. Examples are sporting events like high school football games, or marching bands practicing. The proposed revision makes such events exempt from the nuisance regulations because they cannot effectively be muffled or eliminated. Council gave consensus to include the proposed noise provisions in the proposed ordinance for first reading. (4) Yard sales. SVMC 7.05.040(0) currently limits yard sales to no more than seven consecutive days, or no more than two consecutive weekends. These were the limits imposed by Council a number of years ago in an effort to try to balance the various interests. Several Councilmembers noted this year that there are a number of properties that appear to be having yard sales throughout the spring and summer months. This impacts neighborhoods by increasing traffic when people are trying to enjoy the weekend in their yards. Some properties have yard sales so often it appears they are operating a commercial business in residentially -zoned areas. The Council may amend the language to further limit the holding of yard sales by putting a cap on the total number that may be held at a property during a calendar year. The draft suggests a total of two, but the Council may change that. Council gave consensus to include the proposed yard sale provisions in the proposed ordinance for first reading. Staff have included the proposed language with various options Page 3 of 4 for the limit on the number of yard sales that may be had each year. Staff will seek Council direction on the limits for the number of yard sales each year. (5) Dwelling or camping in the rights-of-way. Currently, there are no prohibitions on people living in motorhomes or travel trailers in the rights-of-way unless they are there for more than 30 days. As such, it is not uncommon to see motorhomes or trailers in the streets, particularly in residential areas, with long extension cords running from them to a building. Similarly, staff has noticed in a number of places steps and slide outs extending into the street, sometimes into or near the lanes of travel. This creates a hazard to the driving public and to those who are in the motorhomes and trailers. It is presumed that many of these are related to seasonal visits from relatives, although others are pretty clearly long-term stays extending several months or more. The City has received some complaints from residents about both of these types of situations. Council gave consensus for staff to come forward with proposed language governing living in RVs in the public rights-of-way. Staff will come forward in the near future with specific provisions for living in RVs in both the ROW and on private property. These provisions are not included in the proposed ordinance for first reading. (6) Camping on private residential property. The City has received a number of complaints or comments over the years from citizens in residentially -zoned, property concerned about somebody in the neighborhood staying long term in a motorhome or travel trailer in the driveway or rear of the property. Under current City Code, a person is permitted to stay in this fashion for up to 30 days. Council gave consensus for staff to come forward with proposed language governing living in RVs on private property. Staff will come forward in the near future with specific provisions for living in RVs in both the ROW and on private property. These provisions are not included in the proposed ordinance for first reading. OPTIONS: Move to advance to a second reading, with or without further amendments. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to advance Ordinance No. 18-001, amending the Spokane Valley Municipal Code related to chronic nuisances and other nuisances, to a second reading. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Unknown. STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney; Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney. ATTACHMENTS: (1) Draft proposed Ordinance No. 18-001; (2) PowerPoint presentation. Page 4 of 4 DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 18-001 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 7.05 OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING CHRONIC NUISANCES AND OTHER UPDATES, AMENDING CHAPTER 17.100 OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE CODE ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES, AMENDING CHAPTER 17.110 OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING WAIVER OF CODE ENFORCEMENT APPEAL FEES, AMENDING APPENDIX A OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO NUISANCES, AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35A.11.020 and RCW 35.22.280(30), the City of Spokane Valley (City) is authorized to "declare what shall be a nuisance, and to abate the same, and to impose fines upon parties who may create, continue, or suffer nuisances to exist; and WHEREAS, pursuant to chapter 7.48 RCW, the City is authorized to obtain an order for a warrant of abatement of public nuisances that may exist within the City; and WHEREAS, pursuant to chapter 7.43 RCW, the City is authorized to determine and abate drug nuisance properties that may exist within the City; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted chapter 7.05 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) to declare what conditions shall be public nuisances within the City, which conditions include, but are not limited to garbage, junk, machinery parts, and other materials improperly stored on property, junk vehicles, excessive dust, excessive noise; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted chapter 17.100 SVMC to provide administrative procedures for enforcement of code violations, including public nuisances; and WHEREAS, there exist within the City a number of properties that are creating significant adverse impacts on the surrounding neighborhood due to the high amount of drug and other criminal activity occurring at the property; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that eliminating chronic nuisances where a high amount of drug and other criminal activity occurs is in the best interest of the public health, safety, and welfare; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the applicable nuisance provisions in the SVMC to allow the City to address and eliminate chronic nuisances and to provide necessary updates to other provisions for the public health, safety, and welfare. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, ordains as follows: Section 1. Purpose. The City Council hereby finds that there exist within the City a number of properties with a high amount of drug and other criminal activity occurring at the property and that these properties create a significant adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood. The City Council further finds that eliminating such chronic nuisances is in the best interest of the public health, safety, and welfare. The City Council hereby finds it appropriate to amend the Spokane Valley Municipal Code to provide for provisions Ordinance 18-001 Regarding Nuisances 1 DRAFT related to chronic nuisances and to update other appropriate Code provisions related to nuisances and nuisance abatement procedures. Section 2. Amendment. Chapter 7.05 SVMC is hereby amended as follows: 7.05.010 Purpose and intent. The purpose and intent of this chapter 7.05 SVMC is to create and maintain a safe and healthy environment for the citizens of the City by identifying and reducing eliminating the conditions that contribute to injury, illness, devaluation of property, and the incidence of crime through the existence of nuisance conditions on public and private property. 7.05.020 Definitions. In addition to any definitions contained in Appendix A, the following words shall, for the purposes of chapters 7.05 and 17.100 SVMC, be defined as: "Abate" means to take whatever steps are deemed necessary by the cmManager city manager or designee to ensure that the property complies with applicable Spokane Valley Municipal Code nuisance ordinance requirements. Abatement may include, but is not limited to, rehabilitation, demolition, removal, replacement or repair. "City" means the City of Spokane Valley, Washington. "Code compliance officer" means a regular or specially commissioned officer so designated by the c mManagercity manager or designee for the City. "Days" will beare counted as business days when five or fewer days are allowed to perform an act required by this chapter 7.05 SVMC. "Days" will beare considered calendar days when more than five days are allowed to de -perform an act required by this chapter 7.05 SVMC. "Days" are countedt a computed by excluding the first day, and including the last day, unless the last day is a holiday, Saturday, or Sunday, pursuant to RCW 1.12.040, as now adopted or hereafter amended. "Determination of compliance" means a written determinationstatement from by the City Managercity manager or designee that evidence exists to determine that the violation(s) stated in the warning, voluntary compliance agreement, notice and order, stop work order, or other applicable order haves been sufficiently abated so as to comply with the SVMC. as to the nuisance violation(s) stated in the voluntary compliance agreement or notice and order. "Director" means the city manager for Spokane Valley, or his/her designee."Found in violation" means t 1. A notice and order has bccn issued and not timely appealed; 2. A voluntary compliance agreement has been entered into; or 3. The hearing examiner has determined that the violation has occurred and such determination has not bccn stayed or reversed on appeal. "Graffiti" means an unauthorized marking, symbol, inscription, word, figure, designmarkings, inscriptions, words, figures, designs, or other inscribed material visible from premises open to the public, that haws been placed upon any property through the use of paint, ink, dye, or any other substance capable of marking property. "Hearing examiner" means the City of Spokane Valley hearing examiner, as provided by Chapter 18.20 SVMC as adopted or hereafter amended. Ordinance 18-001 Regarding Nuisances 2 DRAFT "Impound," for the purposes of this chapter, means to take and hold a vehicle in legal custody pursuant to law. "Inoperable" means incapable of being operated legally on a public highway, including, but not limited to, not having a valid, current registration plate or a current certificate of registration. "Junk vehicle" means a vehicle substantially meeting at least three of the following criteria: 1. Is three years old or older; 2. Is extensively damaged, such damage including but not limited to any of the following: a broken window or windshield, or missing wheels, tires, motor, or transmission; 3. Is apparently inoperable; 4. Has an approximate fair market value equal only to the approximate value of the scrap in it. "Mitigate" means to take measures, subject to City approval, to minimize the harmful effects of the nuisance violation where remediation is either impossible or unreasonably burdensome. "Nuisance" means a person'sthe unreasonable or unlawful use by a person of real or personal property, or the unreasonable, indecent, or unlawful personal conduct or omission of conduct which materially interferes with, obstructs, or jeopardizes the health, safety, prosperity, quiet enjoyment of property, or welfare of others, offends common decency or public morality, or obstructs or interferes with the free use of public ways, places, or bodies of water. "On-going criminal activity related to the premises" means that (1) criminal activity is or has been occurring at the premises; or (2) criminal activity is or has been occurring near the premises and such activity has a reasonable and proximate connection to the premises, whether by owners, occupants, or persons visiting such owners or occupants. Examples of conduct or actions that constitute criminal activity occurring at or near the premises of the subject property include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Service of a search warrant by law enforcement personnel; or 2. Arrest of one or more individuals by law enforcement personnel during any 24-hour period; or 3. Commission of a misdemeanor, gross misdemeanor, or felony at or near the premises and where there is a reasonable and proximate connection between the crime or criminal and the premises, including those visiting the owner or occupants of the premises; or 4. Visits by law enforcement personnel which occur based upon a reasonable belief by law enforcement that a crime is occurring or has occurred, but which do not result in any of the actions identified in (1)-(3) above; provided that visits alone may not form the sole basis for determining a premises to be a chronic nuisance premises. For purposes of this definition, service of warrants, arrests, or commission of misdemeanor or felony domestic violence shall not be considered criminal activity. "Person" means any public or private individual, sole proprietorship, association, partnership, corporation, or legal entity, whether for-profit or not-for-profit. public or private, and the agents and assigns thereof.e€ such individual, association, partnership, corporation or legal entity. "Person(s) responsible for a nuisance violation" means the person or persons who caused the violation, if that can be determined, and/or the owner, lessor, tenant, or other person(s) entitled to control, use, and/or occupancy of the property and the abutting public rights-of-way.,including any public rights of way abutting a person, firm, or entity's property where the nuisance violation occurs. Ordinance 18-001 Regarding Nuisances 3 DRAFT "Person(s) responsible for a junk vehicle nuisance violation" means any one or more of the following: 1. The land owner where the junk vehicle is located as shown on the last equalized assessment roll; or 2. The last registered owner of the vehicle, unless the owner in the transfer of ownership of the vehicle has complied with RCW 16.12.101state law; or 3. The legal owner of the vehicle. "Remediate" means to restore a site to a condition which docs not pose a probable threat to the general public health, safety or welfare. "Vehicle," for the purposes of SVMC 7.05.040(PN), includes every device capable of being moved upon a public highway and in, upon, or by which any persons or property is or may be transported or drawn upon a public highway, including bicycles. The term does not include devices other than bicycles moved by human or animal power or used exclusively upon stationary rails or tracks, pursuant toas set forth in RCW 46.04.670. 7.05.030 Compliance, authority and administration. In order to discourage public nuisances and otherwise promote compliance with this chapter 7.05 SVMC, the City Manager or designee may, in response to field observations, determine that violations of this chapter 7.05 SVMC have occurred or are occurring, and may utilize any of the compliance provisions set forth in contained in Gchapter 17.100 SVMC. 7.05.040 Nuisances prohibited. No person, firm, or entity shall erect, contrive, cause, continue, maintain, or permit to exist any public nuisance nuisances within the City including on the property of any person, firm, or entity or upon any public rights-of-way abutting a person, firm, or entity's property. Prohibited public nuisances include, but are not limited to: A. Vegetation. 1. Any vegetation, or parts thereof, which hang lower than eight feet aboveover any public walkway or sidewalk; or hang lower than 14 feet aboveover any public street; or which are growing thereon in such a manner as to obstruct or impair the free and full use of anythe public walkway, sidewalk, or street by the public„ or violate City clearview triangle policies regulationsadopted by the City. The City shall be responsible for maintaining all vegetation placed by the City adjacent to a public walkway, sidewalk, walkway, or roadwaystreet. 2. Any growth of noxious weeds or any toxic vegetation shall be subject to Gchapter 16-750 WAC as currently adopted and hereafter amended. B. Buildings, Structures, Fences. �. Buildings or portions thereof which are deemed dangerous or unfit pursuant to the Spokane Valley building codoSVMC (including all building and property maintenance codes and regulations as currently adopted and hereafter amended). currently adopted International Property Maintenance Code and the International Existing Building Code); provided, that such conditions or defects exist to the extent that the life, health, property or safety of the public or the structure's occupants is endangered. 2. Any fence that obstructs or obscures the view of traffic or traffic control devices, pursuant to clearview triangle policies adopted by the City. C. Sidewalks. Ordinance 18-001 Regarding Nuisances 4 DRAFT 1. Any protrusion, awning, or overhang that inhibits or obstructs use of a public walkway or sidewalk. 2. Any object, construction, or damage that inhibits or obstructs the surface use of a public walkway or sidewalk. 3. Snow or ice not removed from a public sidewalk within a reasonable time. 43. Accumulations of dirt or debris not removed from a public sidewalk. D. Unauthorized Signs. Any sign not in compliance with the City's currently adopted sign code. €D. Accumulations of Materials, Garbage, Recyclables, Furniture, Machinery. 1. Building and Construction Materials. Any accumulations, stacks, or piles of building or construction materials, including but not limited to metal, wood, wire, electrical, or plumbing materials, not associated with a current, in -progress project including metal, wood, wire, and electrical or plumbing materials, and not in a lawful storage structure or container. in disarray or exposed to the elements on the property. This provision does not apply to a designated contractor's yard, as defined in the currently adopted Spokane Valley zoning code. 2. Garbage, Recyclables, Compost, and Infestations. a. Garbage or recyclables not kept in a properly stored in a receptacle with a tight -fitting lid. b. Any accumulationccumulations of broken or neglected items, litter, salvage materials, oro junk not in an approved enclosed structure. c. Recyclables not properly stored and regularly disposed of. 4c. Creating or maintaining any accumulations of matter, including but not limited to foodstuffs; or dead vegetation (excluding properly maintained residential compost piles) that harbor or are an attraction for the infestation of insects or vermin; failinging to eliminate such infestations;; or or ffailinging to eliminate intrusive insects. 3. Furniture, -ate Appliances, Furnishings, and Equipment. a. Any4ll broken or discarded household furniture, furnishings ef-equipment, or any applianceappliances not in an approved enclosed structure. b. All accessible refrigeration appliances not having the doors secured or removed, or any enclosure that can entrap humans or animals. Any enclosure which may entrap a human or an animal, including accessible refrigeration appliances that have not had the doors secured or removed. 4. Machinery and Equipment. Any broken or inoperable; accumulation of, or part of, accumulations of, or parts of machinery or equipment not in an approved enclosed structure. SVMC 7.05.040(D)(4)This subsection does shall include such machinery and equipment as boats, let -skis, snowmobiles, aircraft, and the like, but shall not include junk vehicles, which that are regulated pursuant to SVMC 7.05.040(N) by subsection LPA of this section. EE. Fire Hazards. Any gstacks or accumulations of newspapers, dead vegetation (excluding properly maintained compost piles), overgrown vegetation, cardboard, or any other paper, cloth, or wood products left in a manner that could poses a substantial risk of combustion or the spread of fire, as determined by the €Fire fcrMarshal. QF. Toxic or Caustic Substances. Improper storming or keeping of any toxic, flammable, or caustic substances or materials. lG. Smoke, Soot, or Odors. Allowing the escape or emissionThe escaping or emitting of any eeeeeessa y er—harmful smoke, soot, fumes, ei-gases, or odors which are offensive or harmful to a reasonable persons of ordinary sensibilities. IH. Bodies of Water. Ordinance 18-001 Regarding Nuisances 5 DRAFT 1 All stagnant, pooled water in which mosquitoes, flies, or other insects may multiply, excluding any City -approved structure related to storm drainage systems. 2. The polluting of any waterway, well, or body of water which is not subject to the jurisdiction of the Spokane Regional Health Districtanother federal, state, county, special purpose district or city agency. K. Holes, Pits, and Excavations. Anyft excavated or naturally occurring uncovered holes, pits, or excavations, which are -not marked, guarded, or otherwise secured, and which constitute a concealed danger_ that arc in excess of 10 or more inches in width at the top and four feet or more in depth. KJ. Attractive Nuisances. Any accessible nuisance which is attractive nuisance to children including, but not limited to, unattended machinery or equipment, unsecured abandoned or vacant buildings, open and unattended vehicle trunks, or other unguarded conditions or situations that could injure or trap a child. liK. Noise 1. Any noise or sound that, originating within a residential zone, intrudes into the property of another person that exceeds the maximum permissible noise levels pursuant toas established in chapter WAC 173 60 81-0173-60, as currently adopted and hereafter amended. Such noise or sound may include, but is not limited to, noise or sound created by use of a radio, television set, musical instrument, sound amplifier, or other device capable of producing or reproducing noise or sound; or in connection with the starting, operation, repair, rebuilding, or testing of any vehicle, off-highway machinery or equipment, or internal combustion engine. 2. The following shall be exempt from the provisions of SVMC 7.05.040(K)(1): a. Normal use of public rights-of-way; b. Sounds created by motor vehicles when regulated by Chapter 173-62 WAC; c. Sounds originating from aircraft in flight and sounds that originate at airports which are directly related to flight operations; d. Sounds created by surface carriers engaged in commerce or passenger travel by railroad; e. Sounds created by warning devices not operating continuously for more than five minutes, or bells, chimes, or carillons; f. Sounds created by safety and protective devices where noise suppression would defeat the intent of the device or is not economically feasible; g. Sounds created by emergency equipment and work necessary in the interest of law enforcement or for health, safety or welfare of the community; h. Sounds originating from officially sanctioned parades and other public events; i. Sounds created by watercraft, except to the extent that they are regulated by other City or state regulations; j. Sounds created by motor vehicles licensed or unlicensed when operated off public highways, except when such sounds are made in or adjacent to residential property where human beings reside or sleep; k. Sounds originating from existing natural gas transmission and distribution facilities; 1. Sounds created in conjunction with public work projects or public work maintenance operations executed at the cost of the federal government, state or municipality; m. Sounds created in conjunction with the collection of solid waste; n. Sounds created in conjunction with military operations or training; o. Sounds originating from organized activities occurring in public parks, playgrounds, gymnasiums, swimming pools, schools, and other public facilities and public recreational facilities during hours of operation; p. Sounds originating from agricultural activities. Ordinance 18-001 Regarding Nuisances 6 DRAFT 3. The following shall be exempt from provisions of SVMC 7.05.040(K)(1) between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m.: a. Sounds originating from residential property relating to temporary projects for the repair or maintenance of homes, grounds, and appurtenances; b. Sounds created by the discharge of firearms on authorized shooting ranges; c. Sounds created by blasting; d. Sounds created by aircraft engine testing and maintenance not related to flight operations; provided, that aircraft testing and maintenance shall be conducted at remote sites whenever possible; e. Sounds created by the installation or repair of essential utility services. 4. The following shall be exempt from the provisions of SVMC 7.05.040(K)(1) between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m., or when conducted beyond 1,000 feet of any residence where human beings reside and sleep at any hour: a. Sounds originating from temporary construction sites as a result of construction activity; b. Sounds originating from the quarrying, blasting and mining of minerals or materials, including, but not limited to, sand, gravel, rock and clay, as well as the primary reduction and processing of minerals or materials for concrete batching, asphalt mixing and rock crushers; c. Sounds originating from uses on properties which have been specifically conditioned to meet certain noise standards by an appropriate City hearing body. 2. Sounds within a residential zone created by use of a radio, television set, musical instrument, sound amplifier, or any other device capable of producing or reproducing sounds, which emanates residential area, and which annoys or disturbs, or interferes with the peace, comfort, or repose of a reasonable person of reasonable sensitivity. 3. The creation of frequent, repetitive or continuous sounds within a residential zone in connection with thc starting, operation, repair, rebuilding or testing of any motor vehicle, motorcycle, off highway vehicle or internal combustion engine within a residential zone, and which annoys, so as to unreasonably disturbs, or interferes with thc peace, and comfort, or repose of a reasonable person of owners or possessors of real property. 'I. Any other sound occurring frequently, repetitively, or continuously which annoys or, disturbs the peace, comfort, or repose of a reasonable person of reasonable sensitivity. ML. Dust.- Any dl3isturbanceing the topsoil of any land area, or permitting the same, without taking affirmative measures to suppress and minimize the blowing and scattering of dust, by any person by any person without taking affirmative measures to suppress and minimize thc blowing and scattering of dust so as -which unreasonably disturb or interferesinterfere with the peace, and comfort, or repose of owners or possessors of real propertya reasonable person. This provision does not include permitted agricultural activities as legal nonconforming uses or permitted agricultural activities in general agricultural zones. N. Nuisance Premises. Any premises or structures allowing or maintaining prostitution, lewd behavior, underage consumption of alcohol, the harboring of juvenile runaways or wanted persons, or where there is the use, sale, manufacturing or distributing of any narcotic or controlled substance, or at which there is a pattern of criminal activity, arc prohibited nuisances. QM. Yard Sales. The holding or permitting of either: 1. Aa yard sale on the same real propertylot for (i) more than seven consecutive days;; er (ii) more than two consecutive weekends fMore than [two/three/four] separate yard sale events in one calendar year. Ordinance 18-001 Regarding Nuisances 7 DRAFT PN. Junk Vehicles. All junk vehicles, or parts thereof, placed, stored,. or permitted to be located on private property within the City limits.- SVMC 7.05.040(N)are public nuisances to be abated as provided in this chapter. This chapter does not apply to: 1. Any vehicle or part thereof that is completely enclosed within a lawful structurebuilding in a lawful manner, so thatwhere it is not visible from the street or mother public or private property; 2. Any vehicle or part thereof that is stored or parked in a lawful manner on private property in connection with the business of a licensed dismantler or licensed vehicle dealer, and the private property is fenced pursuant toaccording to the provisions of RCW 46.80.130; 3. A junk vehicle does not include a vehicle which is in the process of being repaired, as evidenced by the good faith efforts of the vehicle owner. This exception shall include having up to one "parts" vehicle, from which parts are being salvaged concurrent with the repair process for the vehicle being excepted from compliance in this section. Good faith efforts of repair mayc-ae include producing invoices showing work or parts purchased for repair or renovation within 30 days prior to issuance of the notice of violation, or a declaration under penalty of perjury that the vehicle is in the process of being repaired and has been worked on within 30 days prior to issuance of the notice of violation. This exception allows up to 60 days for good faith repair. Upon good cause shown, the city managerCity Manager or designee shall have the discretion to grant one additional 60 -day exception period pursuant to SVMC 7.05.040(PN).this chapter. Under no circumstance shall any good faith efforts of repair extend for more than 120 days, after which time this exception shall no longer apply. This exception shall apply to one vehicle and one parts vehicle per parcel of land per calendar year; 4. There shall be allowed as exceptions to SVMC 7.05.040(PN)this chapter up to two junk vehicles in R-1, R-2, and R-3 and R 1 zones, so long as they are completely sight -screened by maintained Type I or II landscaping, a maintained landscaped berm, or fencing, as may be required in the currently adopted zoning codeallowed pursuant to any currently adopted SVMC landscaping, berm, or fencing requirementsJunk vehicles allowed by this exception arc restricted to only the R 1, R 2, R 3 and R 1 zones. QO. Graffiti. All graffiti upon public or private property is deemed a nuisanceAny graffiti on public or private property. RP. Development Code Violations. Any violation pursuant to Titles 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, and/or 25 SVMC. 7.05.045 Chronic Nuisances. A. The City Manager or designee may declare that a parcel or lot of real property, a building, including but not limited to the structure or any separate part of portion thereof, whether permanent or not, or the ground itself, or a e -unit within a building, constitutes a chronic nuisance when any of the following conditions occur: 1. During any continuous 12 -month period, the property in question: (a) a final determination has been made by the City that conditions on the property constitute a nuisance pursuant to chapters 7.05 SVMC and 17.100 SVMC; and (b) has four or more occurrences of on-going criminal activity related to the premises; or 2. During any 12 -month period, the property in question has five or more occurrences of on-going criminal activity related to the premises. B. Defenses. It shall be a defense against a declaration of chronic nuisance if the person alleged to be responsible for the nuisance (1) affirmatively engages in reasonable and ongoing efforts to remedy the nuisance and/or on-going criminal activity; and (2) is not the perpetrator nor allows the perpetration of the nuisance or on-going criminal activities. Ordinance 18-001 Regarding Nuisances 8 DRAFT 7.05.050 .Repealed. A. Upon receipt of a complaint, field verification of nuisance conditions should be made if possible prior to, concurrent with, or shortly after notifying the person responsible for the nuisance violation or alleged nuisance violation. B. Advising Interested Parties of Apparent Violation. The person responsible for the nuisance violation should be advised of any apparent violation, which may be by personal contact, phone, posting, or regular mail. The letter should state that a violation may have occurred, but has not been verified, and should ask the recipient to contact the City staff person issuing the letter. C. The city manager or designee will record all violations in a database system, including a list of all actions taken on the complaint. D. Staff undertaking field investigations shall comply with the provisions of this chapter_regarding right of entry. 7.05.060 Procedures when probable nuisance violation is identified. The City shall follow procedures pursuant to chapter 17.100 SVMC to identify nuisances, enforce the provisions of, and to remedy and abate any of the nuisances prohibited under chapter 7.05 SVMC. A. The city manager or designee shall determine, based upon information derived from sources such as field observations, the statements of witnesses, relevant documents and data systems for tracking violations document the violation and promptly notify the person(s) responsible for the nuisance violation. B. Except as provided in subsection D of this section, a warning shall be issued verbally or in writing promptly when a field inspection reveals a violation, or as soon as the city manager or designee otherwise determines a nuisance violation has occurred. The warning shall inform the person determined to be responsible for a nuisance violation of the violation and allow the person an opportunity to correct it or enter into a voluntary compliance agreement as provided for by this chapter. Verbal warnings shall be logged and followed up with a written warning within five days, and the site shall be reinspected. C. The guidelines set forth for warnings, notifications and reinspections are not jurisdictional, and failure to meet them in any particular case shall not affect the City's authority to enforce nuisance provisions with regard to that case. D. No warning need be issued in emergencies, repeat violation cases, cases that are already subject to a that is not likely to be corrected within 72 hours, or when the person responsible for the nuisance violation E. Notice and orders should be issued in all cases where the city manager or designee determines that the violation is unlikely to be fully corrected within 72 hours. F. If the violation is not corrected, the city manager or designee shall utilize the enforcement provisions contained in Chapter 17.100 SVMC as adopted or hereafter amended to obtain compliance with the applicable code provisions. Section 3. Amendment. The following sections of chapter 17.100 SVMC are hereby amended as follows. Any section of chapter 17.100 SVMC not identified herein shall remain unchanged. 17.100.030 Enforcement, authority, and administration. A. In order to discourage public nuisances and otherwise promote compliance with applicable code provisions, the City may, in response to field observations, determine that violations of SVMC Titles 17 through 22 and 24 SVMC and chapter 7.05 SVMC have occurred or are occurring, and may: 1. Enter into voluntary compliance agreements with persons responsible for code violations; 2. Issue notice and orders, require voluntary compliance, assess civil penalties, and recover costs pursuant toas authorized by Gchapter 17.100 SVMC; Ordinance 18-001 Regarding Nuisances 9 DRAFT 3. Require abatement by means of a judicial abatement order, and if such abatement is not timely completed by the person or persons responsible for a code violation, undertake the abatement and charge the reasonable costs of such work pursuant toas authorized by Gchapter 17.100 SVMC; 4. Allow a person responsible for the code violation to perform community service in lieu of paying civil penalties pursuant to as authorized by €chapter 17.100 SVMC; 5. Order work stopped at a site by means of a stop work order, and if such order is not complied with, assess civil penalties pursuant to as authorized by Cchapter 17.100 SVMC; 6. Suspend, revoke, or modify any permit previously issued by the City or deny a permit application pursuant toas authorized by cchapter 17.100 SVMC when other efforts to achieve compliance have failed; and 7. Forward a written statement providing all relevant information relating to the violation to the office of the city attorney with a recommendation to prosecute willful and knowing violations as misdemeanor offenses. B. The procedures set forth in Chapter 17.100 SVMC are not exclusive. These procedures shall not in any manner limit or restrict the City from remedying or abating violations of SVMC Titles 17 through 24 and Gchapter 7.05 SVMC in any other manner authorized by law. C. In addition to, or as an alternative to, utilizing the procedures set forth in cchapter 17.100 SVMC, the City may seek legal or equitable relief to abate any conditions or enjoin any acts or practices which constitute a code violation. D. In addition to, or as an alternative to, utilizing the procedures set forth in cchapter 17.100 SVMC, the City may assess or recover civil penalties accruing pursuant tounder €chapter 17.100 SVMC by legal action filed in Spokane County district court or superior court by the office of the city attorney. E. The provisions of Cchapter 17.100 SVMC shall in no way adversely affect the rights of the owner, lessee, or occupant of any property to recover all costs and expenses incurred and required by Gchapter 17.100 SVMC from any person causing such violation. F. In administering the provisions for code compliance, the City shall have the authority to waive any one or more such provisions so as to avoid substantial injustice. Any determination of substantial injustice shall be made in writing supported by appropriate facts._ For purposes of SVMC 17.100.030, substantial injustice maycannot not be based exclusively on financial hardship. G. The City may, upon presentation of proper credentials, with the consent of the owner or occupier of a building or premises, or pursuant to a lawfully issued court order, enter at reasonable times any building or premises subject to the consent or court order to perform the duties imposed by the SVMC. It is the intent of the city council that any entry made to private property for the purpose of inspection for code violations be accomplished in strict conformity with constitutional and statutory constraints on entry, and the holdings of the relevant court cases regarding entry. The right of entry authorized by Cchapter 17.100 SVMC shall not supersede those legal constraints. H. The City may request that the police, appropriate fire district, Spokane Regional Health District, or other appropriate City department or other non -City agency assist in enforcement. 17.100.050 Procedures when probable violation is identified. A. The City shall determine, based upon information derived from sources such as field observations, the statements of witnesses, relevant documents, and data systems for tracking violations and applicable City codes and regulations, whether or not a violation has occurred. As soon as the City has reasonable cause to Ordinance 18-001 Regarding Nuisances 10 DRAFT determine that a violation has occurred, the violation shall be documented and the person responsible for the code violations promptly notified. B. Except as provided in SVMC 17.100.050(C), a warning shall be issued verbally or in writing promptly when a field inspection reveals a violation, or as soon as the City otherwise determines a violation has occurred. The warning shall inform the person determined to be responsible for a code violation of the violation and allow the person an opportunity to correct it or enter into a voluntary compliance agreement pursuant toas provided for by Gchapter 17.100 SVMC. Verbal warnings shall be logged and followed up with a written warning within five days, and the site shall be reinspected within 14 days. C. No warning need be issued in emergencies, repeat violation cases, cases that are already subject to a voluntary compliance agreement, cases where the violation creates or has created a situation or condition that is not likely to be corrected within 72 hours, cases where a stop work order is necessary, or when the person responsible for the code violation knows, or reasonably should have known, that the action was a code violation. D. Notice and orders may Ghould be_ -issued in all cases in whichwhen a violation has been found and a voluntary compliance agreement has not been entered. When determining whether to issue a notice and order, the City may consider a number of relevant factors and criteria, including but not limited to the severity of the public impact of the nuisance violation, the time and cost to abate the nuisance violation, the likelihood to recover any costs of abatement, and the available City resources to abate the nuisance violation. E. The City shall use all reasonable means to determine and proceed against the person(s) actually responsible for the code violation occurring when the property owner has not directly or indirectly caused the violation. F. The warning shall specify a reasonable time frame for abatement of the violation, which may be modified based upon abatement progress; provided, however, that the initial amount of time for abatement shall not be longer than 30 days. A notice and order or stop work order shall be issued in the event the violation is not corrected or a voluntary compliance agreement is not entered into in the time period specified in the warning. If the violation is not corrected, or a voluntary compliance agreement is not entered into within 30 days of notification by the City, a notice and order or stop work order should be issued. Stop work orders should be issued promptly upon discovery of a violation in progress. 17.100.060 Service — Notice and Order and §Stop wWork eOrder. A. Service of a notice and order shall be made on a person responsible fora code violation by one or more of the following methods: 1. Personal service of a notice and order may be made on the person identified by the City as being responsible for the code violation, or by leaving a copy of the notice and order at the person's house of usual abode with a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there. For corporations and business entities, in-person service shall be on the registered agent as listed in the records of the Washington State Secretary of State; 2. Service directed to the landowner and/or occupant of the property may be made by posting the notice and order in a conspicuous place on the property where the violation occurred and concurrently mailing notice as provided for below, if a mailing address is available; or 3. Service by mail may be made for a notice and order by mailing one copy, postage prepaid, by ordinary first class mail to the person responsible for the code violation at his or her last known address, at the address of the violation, or at the address of the registered agent as shown in the records of the Washington State Secretary of State for corporations and business entitiesplacc of business of the person responsible for the code violation. Except for corporations and business entities, Tthe taxpayer's address as shown on the Ordinance 18-001 Regarding Nuisances 11 DRAFT tax records of Spokane County shall be deemed to be the proper address for the purpose of mailing such notice to the landowner of the property where the violation occurred. Service by mail shall be presumed effective upon the third business day following the day upon which the notice and order was placed in the mail. B. For notice and orders only, when the address of the person responsible for the code violation cannot be reasonably determined, service may be made by publication once a week for two consecutive weeks in an appropriate regional or neighborhood newspaper or trade journal. Service by publication shall be deemed complete at the expiration of the time prescribed for publication. A notice and order served by publication shall be signed by a code compliance enforcement officer, shall include the dates of the publication, and shall contain a brief statement of the nature of the action and how it can be remedied. C. Service of a stop work order on a person responsible for a code violation may be made by posting the stop work order in a conspicuous place on the property where the violation occurred or by serving the stop work order in any other manner permitted by Chapter 17.100 SVMC. D. The failure of the City to make or attempt service on any person named in the notice of violation, notice and order, or stop work order shall not invalidate any proceedings as to any other person duly served. 17.100.250 Civil penalties — Assessment schedule. A. Civil penalties for code violations shall be imposed for remedial purposes for violations identified in a notice and order or stop work order, pursuant to the following schedule: Violation Penalty Amount First violation $500 Second separate violation within $1000 three year period (may be same type of nuisance as initial violation) Each subsequent separate $2,000 violation within three year period (may be same type of nuisance as previous violation(s)) Violation which is likely to 10 000 result in an economic benefit to the person responsible for the violation Chronic nuisance violation $2.500 pursuant to SVMC 7.05.045 Notice and orders and stop work orders basic initial penalty: $500.00. B. Additional penalties shall be added where there is: 1. Second violation: $500.00. 2. Each subsequent violation (three or more): $1,000. 3. Eeconomic benefit to the person responsible for violation: $5,000. C. Civil penalties shall be paid within 20 days of service of the notice and order or stop work order if not appealed. _Payment of the civil penalties pursuant to assessed under cGhapter 17.100 SVMC does not Ordinance 18-001 Regarding Nuisances 12 DRAFT relieve a person found to be responsible for a code violation of his or her duty to correct the violation and/or to pay any and all civil penalties or other cost assessments issued pursuant to Echapter 17.100 SVMC. D. The City may suspend civil penalties if the person responsible for a code violation has entered into and fulfilled all requirements of a voluntary compliance agreement pursuant to SVMC 17.100.100.- E. Civil penalties which are assessed create a joint and several personal obligation in all persons responsible for a code violation. may file for record with the Spokane County aAuditor to claim a lien against the real property for the , civil penalties, and costs of suit assessed pursuant to under Cchaptcr 17.100 SVMC if the violation was reasonably related to the real property. Any such lien can be filed under Chapter 17.100 SVMC if, after the expiration of 30 days from when a person responsible for a code violation receives the notice and order or 17.100.300 Cost recovery. A. In addition to the other remedies x ursuant toavailable under Echapter 17.100 SVMC, upon issuance of a notice and order or stop work order, the City shall charge the costs of pursuing code compliance and abatement incurred to correct a code violation to the person responsible for a code violation. These charges include: 1. Reasonable Legal Fees and Costs. For purposes of SVMC 17.100.300, "reasonable legal fees and costs" shall include, but are not limited to, legal personnel costs, both direct and related, incurred to enforce the provisions of Echapter 17.100 SVMC as may be allowed by law; 2. Administrative Personnel Costs. For purposes of SVMC 17.100.300, "administrative personnel costs" shall include, but are not limited to, administrative employee costs, both direct and related, incurred to enforce the provisions of Echapter 17.100 SVMC; 3. Abatement Costs. The City shall keep an itemized account of costs incurred by the City in the abatement of a violation under Echapter 17.100 SVMC; and 4. Actual expenses and costs of the City in preparing notices, specifications, and contracts; in accomplishing or contracting and inspecting the work; and the costs of any required printing, mailing, or court filing fees. B. Such costs are due and payable 30 days from mailing of the invoice. C. All costs assessed by the City in pursuing code enforcementeompliance. and/or abatement create joint and several personal obligations in all persons responsible for a violation. The office of the city attorney, on behalf of the City, may collect the costs of code compliance efforts by any appropriate legal means. D. In addition to, or in lieu of, any other state or local provision for the recovery of costs, the City may, after abating a violation pursuant to Chapter 17.100 SVMC, file for record with the Spokane County auditor to claim a lien against the real property for the assessed costs identified in Chapter 17.100 SVMC if the state law. E. Any lien filed shall be subordinate to all previously existing special assessment liens imposed on the same property and shall be superior to all other liens, except for state and county taxes, with which it shall Ordinance 18-001 Regarding Nuisances 13 DRAFT share priority. The City may cause a claim of lien to be filed for record within 90 days from the later of the date that the monetary penalty is due or the date the work is completed or the nuisance abated. The claim of lien shall contain sufficient information regarding the notice and order, a description of the property to be charged with the lien, the owner of record, and the total of the lien. Any such claim of lien may be the period as provided for by state law. 17.100.310 Collection of civil penalties, fees, and costs. A. The City may use the services of a collection agency in order to collect any civil penalties, fees, costs, and/or interest owing under Cchapter 17.100. SVMC. B. In addition to, or in lieu of, any other state or local provision for the recovery of costs, the City may, after abating a violation pursuant to Cchapter 17.100 SVMC, file for record with the Spokane County Auditor to claim a lien against the real property for the civil penalties, fees, and costs assessed pursuant to Cchapter 17.100 SVMC if the violation was reasonably related to the real property, in accordance with any lien provisions authorized by state law. C. Any lien filed shall be subject to priority pursuant to state law, including but not limited to RCW 35A.21.405, as now adopted or hereafter amended. Any such claim of lien may be amended from time to time to reflect changed conditions. Any such lien shall bind the affected property for the period as provided for by state law. 17.100.320 Abatement. A. Emergency Abatement. Whenever a condition constitutes an immediate threat to the public health, safety, or welfare or to the environment, the City may summarily and without prior notice abate the condition. Notice of such abatement, including the reason for it, shall be given to the person responsible for the violation as soon as reasonably possible after the abatement. B. Judicial Abatement. The City may seek a judicial abatement order from Spokane County superior court to abate a condition which continues to be a violation of SVMC where other methods of remedial action have failed to produce compliance. C. The City shall seek to recover the costs of abatement as authorized by Cchapter 17.100 SVMC. 17.100.325 Abatement — Chronic Nuisances. A. Chronic Nuisance Judicial Abatement Order. The City may seek a judicial abatement order from Spokane County eSuperior eCourt to abate a condition deemed a chronic nuisance pursuant to ehaptefSVMC 7.05.045 SVMC where other methods of remedial action have failed to produce compliance. This abatement order, in addition to the remedies outlined in the remainder of chapter 17.100 SVMC, may seek abatement of the chronic nuisance as follows: 1. Direct the removal of all personal property subject to seizure and forfeiture pursuant to RCW 69.50.505 from the property, building, or unit within a building, and direct their disposition pursuant to the forfeiture provisions of RCW 69.50.505. 2. Provide for the immediate closure of the property, building, or unit within a building against its use for any purpose, and for keeping it closed for a period of up to one year unless released sooner pursuant to chapter 17.100 SVMC. :. . . - .. • ; and Ordinance 18-001 Regarding Nuisances 14 DRAFT 3. State that while the order of abatement remains in effect, the property, building, or unit(s) within a building ... .. }shall remain in the custody of the court. n order for abatement ofa granted 12 B. The City shall may seek to recover the costs . • ., chapter 17.100 SVMC. 17.100.340 Judicial enforcement — Petition for enforcement. I of abatement pursuant to A. In addition to any other judicial or administrative remedy, the Cityoffice of the city attorney, on behalf of the City, may seek enforcement of the City's order by filing a petition for enforcement in Spokane County eSuperior eCourt. B. The City shall petition must name as a respondent each person against whom the City seeks to obtain civil enforcement. C. A petition for civil In seeking Superior Court enforcement, the City may request monetary relief, declaratory relief, temporary or permanent injunctive relief, and any other civil remedy provided by law, or any combination of the foregoing. Section 4. Amendment. Chapter 17.110 SVMC is hereby amended as follows: 17.110.010 Master fee schedule. All fees and penalties for development permits, code interpretations, violations of provisions of SVMC Title 17 or allowed appeals shall be set forth in the City master fee schedule. A copy of this schedule shall be available from the City Clerkat the department. 17.110.020 Waiver of code enforcement appeal fee. A. A person, on the basis of indigent status, may request, in writing, a waiver of the appeal fee of any code enforcement decision made pursuant to chapter 17.100 SVMC if such indigent status exists because: 1. The person is currently receiving assistance under a needs -based, means -tested assistance program including, but not limited to, the following: Federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families; State -provided general assistance for unemployable individuals; Federal Supplemental Security Income; Federal poverty -related Veteran's benefits; and food stamps programs; or 2. The person's household income is at or below 125% of the federal poverty guideline; or 3. The person's household income is above 125% of the federal poverty guideline and the applicant has recurring basic living expenses (as defined in RCW 10.101.010(2)(d)) that render the person without the financial ability to pay the appeal fee; or 4. There are other compelling circumstances that demonstrate the person's inability to pay the appeal fee. B. A person seeking a waiver of the appeal fee of a code enforcement decision shall include written proof of indigent status in the written request to waive the appeal fee. C. The City Manager shall consider and make a written determination of the waiver request prior to the appeal hearing. The City may schedule a hearing while the waiver request is being processed; provided, however, the City shall not conduct the hearing if a waiver request is denied until payment is made. Ordinance 18-001 Regarding Nuisances 15 DRAFT Section 5. Amendment. Appendix A of the SVMC is hereby amended as follows: A. General Provisions. 1. For the purpose of this code, certain words and terms are herein defined. The word "shall" is always mandatory. The word "may" is permissive, subject to the judgment of the person administering the code. 2. Words not defined herein shall be construed as defined in Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary. 3. The present tense includes the future and the present. 4. The singular number includes the plural and the singular. 5. Use of male designations shall also include female. B. Definitions. AASHTO: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Abandoned: Knowing relinquishment by the owner, of right or claim to the subject property or structure on that property, without any intention of transferring rights to the property or structure to another owner, tenant, or lessee, or of resuming the owner's use of the property. "Abandoned" shall include but not be limited to circumstances involving tax forfeiture, bankruptcy, or mortgage foreclosure. "Abate" means to take whatever steps are deemed necessary by the City Manager or designee to ensure that the property complies with applicable SVMC requirements. Abatement may include, but is not limited to, rehabilitation, demolition, removal, replacement, or repair. Section 5. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase in this Ordinance. Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provided by law. Passed by the City Council this day of , 2018. City of Spokane Valley ATTEST: L.R. Higgins, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 18-001 Regarding Nuisances 16 Code Compliance Update and Proposed Ordinance No. 18-001 Cary Driskell City Attorney, City of Spokane Valley Erik Lamb Deputy City Attorney, City of Spokane Valley January 9, 2017 City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney r Background • The City adopted its nuisance provisions shortly after incorporation in 2003. Prior to incorporation, Spokane County had done very little code compliance. As a result, there were many properties with junk vehicles, trash, accumulations of broken machinery, etc. These provisions have been revised over time as needed to address new or different situations. The primary provisions are in chapter 7.05 SVMC (nuisances) and chapter 17.1oo (enforcement). City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney History and Background City staff gave background on code enforcement process on December 12, 2017. Proposed several revisions to code enforcement process, with primary focus on chronic nuisances and necessary updates to general code enforcement provisions. Include revisions to update based on changes in law, for consistency with the Code, or for clarity. Council provided input on six substantive areas and gave consensus for staff to come forward with a proposed ordinance for a first reading. City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney Previsions— sUs ar�tiv�revisions City council discussion and decisions regarding the topics during the December 12, 2017 meeting were as follows: Chronic nuisances; Consensus to include provisions in proposed Ordinance for first reading. Noise and odors relating to urban animal keeping; Motion approved 6-i to keep existing animal keeping regulations. No provisions or changes necessary or included in proposed Ordinance. Other noise complaints; Consensus to include provisions in proposed Ordinance for first reading. City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney 4 sed revisions —coat. City council discussion and decisions regarding the topics during the December 12, 2017 meeting were as follows: Yard sales; Consensus to include provisions in first reading. Council will need to decide the limit for the number of times someone may have a yard sale annually. Proposed draft has multiple options or Council may direct a different option. Camping in motorhomes/travel trailers in the rights-of-way; and camping in motorhomes/travel trailers on residential property. Council gave consensus for staff to come forward with proposed provisions governing living in RVs in the ROW and on private property. Staff will come forward in the near future with specific provisions for living in RVs in both the ROW and on private property. These provisions are not included in the proposed Ordinance. City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney PropesdOTdTha n ce 1 Section is Purpose Section 2: Amendments to chapter 7.05 SVMC Includes minor revisions, updates, clarifying language, chronic nuisances, noise, and yard sales. Section 3: Amendments to chapter 17.1oo SVMC Includes minor revisions, updates, clarifying language, specific procedures and remedies for chronic nuisances. Section 4: Amendments to chapter 17.110 SVMC Update to waiving code enforcement appeal fee Legal requirement to allow this. Section 5: Amendments to Appendix A related to nuisances City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney Questions of staff? City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney 7 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 9, 2018 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ['admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First reading of proposed Ordinance No. 18-002 to adopt proposed unfit dwelling regulations. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Chapter 35.80 RCW PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council heard an administrative report on December 19, 2017. BACKGROUND: The City is seeking City Council action on another nuisance abatement tool. The City has several existing code enforcement provisions for dealing with public nuisances. These include chapter 7.05 SVMC, which outlines specific public nuisances including junk, garbage, junk vehicles, noise, odor, and dust; Titles 19 through 24 SVMC, which provide development, land use, and building safety regulations; and chapter 17.100 SVMC, which provides the administrative enforcement procedures for identifying and remedying nuisances and violations of development, land use, and building codes. Remedies include authority to obtain court orders and warrants authorizing the City to enter private property and abate the violations through removal of the garbage, or through requiring the responsible person to comply with the court order. Further, chapter 17.100 authorizes the City to recover costs related to any abatement action through the court system. Once a court judgment is obtained, it is recorded against the property and becomes a lien which is then paid once the property is sold. Further, the City works with owners on payment plans to recover costs prior to the transfer of property. However, cost recovery for nuisance abatement is limited under State law, which provides that liens are subject to all prior liens that are recorded before them. These include State and local taxes that are still owing and prior mortgages. Thus, if a property is in tax default and has several existing mortgages, those must be paid off before the City's cost recovery lien will be paid. The City worked with our local legislators to obtain a change to State law, and now the first $2,000 of the City's nuisance lien is a priority lien that is of equal rank of State and local taxes, so it is paid first along with those taxes. However, the remainder is still subject to the "first in time" rule and may not be paid depending on the other outstanding liens. Although the City's priority lien is limited to the first $2,000, it generally works for normal nuisance abatements, as costs typically run from $1,500 to $2,500. The City has had very few above $5,000. However, for abatement of unfit dwellings and structures, the cost recovery process becomes problematic. Abatement of unfit dwellings and structures often involves demolition of the structure, which can cost tens of thousands of dollars. Unfit dwellings and structures are often caused by fire or through long-time abandonment. State law option — Chapter 35.80 RCW State law provides an option for the City to maximize cost recovery on abatement of unfit dwellings, buildings, and structures. Chapter 35.80 RCW allows the City to recover all costs of Page 1 of 2 abatement of unfit dwellings, buildings, and structures as a priority lien of equal rank with state and local taxes. Notably, it is limited solely to abatement of unfit dwellings, buildings, and structures, so it cannot be used for normal nuisance abatement. However, it requires the City to adopt an ordinance to provide specific procedures for making determinations of unfit buildings and providing an opportunity for owners to respond. These procedures are similar, but still different from existing City code enforcement procedures. Thus, staff is proposing an ordinance adopting a new chapter 17.105 SVMC to comply with the requirements of chapter 35.80 RCW to allow the City to utilize the cost recovery for abatement of unfit dwellings, buildings, and structures. As part of the requirements of chapter 35.80 RCW, the City must create or designate an improvement board or officer. This officer conducts preliminary investigations and issues complaints identifying that a dwelling or building is unfit for use. There are extensive notice requirements for distribution of the complaint, including mailing, posting, and filing a copy with the county auditor. The officer must conduct a hearing on the complaint and must allow the owner an opportunity to respond. After the hearing, the officer may issue a final order. Again, there are extensive notice requirements for distributing the order. The order must also specify the required action to remedy the issues, which will include repair or demolition of the dwelling or structure, and the time period for such action to occur. Further, defendants may appeal an order within 30 days. The proposed ordinance specifies that the City Manager or designee will be the improvement officer. Staff have identified that the Building Official will be the likely designated improvement officer. The City must also create or designate an appeals commission to hear any appeals of an officer's order. The proposed ordinance specifies that the Hearing Examiner will act as the appeals commission. Further, the proposed ordinance includes the necessary appeals procedures for any Hearing Examiner appeal. Additionally, RCW 35.80.030 authorizes the City to create minimum standards for use and occupancy of dwellings, buildings, and structures, including when such dwellings, buildings, and structures are unfit for use. Further the City is required to create standards for when an unfit structure may be repaired versus when it must be demolished. Proposed section 17.105.040(A) SVMC includes the minimum standards for determining when a structure is unfit for use. Proposed section 17.105.040(C) SVMC includes the criteria for determining the appropriate remedial action. Finally, as discussed above, pursuant to RCW 35.80.030, the proposed ordinance also includes authority for the City to abate unfit dwellings, buildings, and structures when voluntary compliance is not achieved, and to recover all abatement costs it incurs. The City is authorized to assess its costs against the property as a lien that is of equal rank with all state and local taxes. OPTIONS: Move to advance to a second reading, with or without further amendments. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to advance Ordinance No. 18-002 adopting chapter 17.105 SVMC for unfit dwelling, building, and structure regulations to a second reading. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Unknown. STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney; Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney. ATTACHMENTS: 1. PowerPoint presentation; 2. Draft Ordinance for Proposed chapter 17.105 SVMC. Page 2 of 2 DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 18-002 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER 17.105 OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATING UNFIT DWELLINGS, BUILDINGS, AND STRUCTURES, AMENDING SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE 17.90.010 FOR UNFIT DWELLINGS, BUILDINGS, AND STRUCTURES, AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, unkempt, unsafe, unsanitary and otherwise improperly maintained dwellings and structures that are not fit for human habitation or other uses pose hazards to the public health, safety and welfare; and WHEREAS, these conditions also adversely affect the value, utility and habitability of property within the City as a whole and specifically cause substantial damage to adjoining and nearby property; and WHEREAS, there exists unkempt, unsafe, unsanitary and otherwise improperly maintained dwellings, buildings, structures, and premises that are not fit for human habitation or other uses; and WHEREAS, it is the responsibility of property owners to properly maintain their properties and dwellings, buildings and structure thereon. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, ordains as follows: Section 1. Purpose. The purpose and intent of this Ordinance is to establish a regulatory framework pursuant to chapter 35.80 RCW to inspect, repair, and demolish unfit dwellings, buildings, structures, and premises that are unfit for human habitation or other use and which are a hazard and threat to public health, safety and welfare within the City of Spokane Valley. Section 2. Adoption. That SVMC Title 17 be amended by adding a new chapter, to be designated "Chapter 17.105 Unfit Dwellings, Buildings, and Structures" - as follows: 17.105.010 Findings; Purpose. It is found that there exists in the City of Spokane Valley dwellings, buildings, structures, and premises which are unfit for human habitation and which are unfit for other uses due to dilapidation, disrepair, structural defects, defects increasing the hazards of fire, accidents, or other calamities, inadequate drainage, overcrowding, or due to other conditions which are harmful to the health and welfare of the residents of the City. This chapter is adopted pursuant to chapter 35.80 RCW and is intended to clarify and strengthen the City's procedures for abating such unfit dwellings, buildings, structures, and premises. This chapter shall only be used for those purposes specified in chapter 35.80 RCW and shall be in addition and supplemental to the powers conferred by any other law, including but not limited to chapter 7.05 SVMC and chapter 17.100 SVMC. Ordinance 18-002 Regulating Unfit Structures Page 1 of 16 DRAFT 17.105.020 Enforcement authority and powers. A. The responsibility for administration and enforcement of chapter 17.105 SVMC, unless otherwise provided, is vested in the City Manager or his or her designee(s). All references to City Manager herein shall include his or her designee(s). The City Manager is designated as the City's "improvement officer" pursuant to RCW 35.80.030 for purposes of chapter 17.105 SVMC. B. The Hearing Examiner is hereby designated as the "appeals commission" pursuant to RCW 35.80.030 for the purposes of chapter 17.105 SVMC and shall have all rights and responsibilities for hearing appeals of administrative orders issued by the City Manager. C. The City Manager may exercise such lawful powers as may be necessary or convenient to effectuate the purposes and provisions of chapter 17.105 SVMC. These powers shall include, but are not limited to the following: 1. To determine, pursuant to standards proscribed herein and by the residential, property, and building codes adopted pursuant to chapter 24.40 SVMC, as the same now exist or are hereafter amended, which dwellings within the City are unfit for human habitation; 2. To determine, pursuant to standards proscribed herein and by the residential, property, and building codes adopted pursuant to chapter 24.40 SVMC, as the same now exist or may hereafter be amended, which buildings, structures, or premises are unfit for other use; 3. To administer oaths and affirmations, examine witnesses and receive evidence; 4. To investigate the dwelling or other property conditions in the City and to enter upon premises to make examinations when the City Manager has reasonable grounds to believe such dwellings, buildings, structures, or premises are unfit for human habitation or for other use; provided such investigations shall comply with all applicable constitutional, federal, state, and local laws and shall be made in such a manner as to cause the least possible inconvenience to the persons in possession; 5. To obtain an order from a court of competent jurisdiction for the purpose of entering premises to make such examinations, after submitting evidence in support of an application which is adequate to justify such an order in the event entry is denied or resisted; 6. To conduct all necessary hearings related to a determination of unfitness and to impose and require such remedies and penalties as may be appropriate to vacate, improve, repair, remove, or demolish unfit dwellings, buildings, structures, or premises; 7. To take all such actions as necessary to collect or assess any allowable costs, fees, or penalties as a result of actions taken pursuant to chapter 17.105 SVMC as allowed by law; and 8. To take such other action as may be reasonably necessary and related to administer, enforce, and carry out the requirements of chapter 17.105 SVMC. 17.105.030 Procedure to abate unfit dwellings, buildings, structures, or premises. A. Complaint. Ordinance 18-002 Regulating Unfit Structures Page 2 of 16 DRAFT 1. If the City Manager, after a preliminary investigation, finds that any dwelling, building, structure or premises is unfit for human habitation or other use pursuant to SVMC 17.105.040, the City Manager shall cause a written complaint to be served either personally or by certified mail, with return receipt requested, upon all persons having any interest therein, as shown upon the records of the Spokane County Auditor, and shall post the complaint in a conspicuous place on the property that is the subject of the complaint. 2. If the whereabouts of any such persons is unknown and cannot be ascertained by the City Manager in the exercise of reasonable diligence, and the City Manager makes an affidavit to that effect with the complaint, then service may be made by: (a) personal service, or (b) mailing the complaint and affidavit by certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to each such person at the address of the building involved in the proceeding, and mailing a copy of the complaint and affidavit by first-class mail to any address listed for each such person in the records of the Spokane County Assessor or Spokane County Auditor. 3. The complaint shall state in what respects such dwelling, building, structure, or premises is unfit for human habitation or other use pursuant to SVMC 17.105.040, the applicable remedies that will be sought, notice of any penalties, and notice that if the City is required to abate the conditions, it may seek all costs, fees and expenses and such costs, fees, and expenses may be assessed upon the property and collected as allowed by law. 4. The complaint shall contain notice that a hearing shall be held before the City Manager at a place specified in the complaint, not less than 10 days nor more than 30 days after the serving of the complaint, and that all parties in interest have the right to file an answer to the complaint, appear in person, or otherwise, and to give testimony at the time and place in the complaint. 5. A copy of the complaint and any supporting affidavit shall be filed with the Spokane County Auditor, and the filing of the complaint shall have the same force and effect as other lis pendens notices provided by law. B. Hearing. As specified in the complaint, the City Manager shall conduct a hearing to determine if a dwelling, building, structure, or premises is unfit for human habitation or other use. All persons identified in the complaint shall have the right and opportunity to file an answer with the City Manager and appear at the hearing in person, or otherwise, and give testimony concerning the preliminary determination set forth in the complaint. The rules of evidence prevailing in courts of law or equity shall not be controlling in hearings before the City Manager. At the conclusion of the hearing, after taking all testimony and reviewing all submitted evidence, the City Manager shall make a determination as to whether the dwelling, building, structure, or premises is unfit for human habitation or other use pursuant to SVMC 17.105.040. C. Findings and Order. 1. Upon a determination that a dwelling, building, structure, or premises is unfit for human habitation or other use pursuant to SVMC 17.105.030(B), the City Manager shall make written findings of fact in support of such determination, and shall issue and cause to be served upon each owner and party in interest as identified in the complaint, either Ordinance 18-002 Regulating Unfit Structures Page 3 of 16 DRAFT personally or by certified mail with return receipt requested, and shall post in a conspicuous place on the property, an order that: (a) requires the owner and other parties in interest, within the time specified in the order, to repair, alter, or improve such dwelling, building structure, or premises to render it fit for human habitation or for other appropriate use, or to vacate, close, and secure the dwelling, building, structure, or premises, if that course of action is deemed lawful and reasonable pursuant to SVMC 17.105.040; or; (b) requires the owner and parties in interest, within the time specified in the order, to remove or demolish the dwelling, building, structure, or premises, if that course of action is deemed lawful and reasonable pursuant to SVMC 17.105.040. If a complainant has made a written request to be notified of the City's response to the complaint filed by the complainant, the City shall mail, first class with postage prepaid, a copy of the order made by the City Manager. 2. An order may require the owner to take effective steps to board up or otherwise bar access to the structure or premises, if deemed necessary for public safety, pending further abatement action. The order shall include any appropriate penalties or remedies available to the City pursuant to chapter 17.105 SVMC or other applicable provisions of the Code. 3. If no appeal is filed within 30 days from the date of service of the order, a copy of the order shall be filed with the Spokane County Auditor, and shall be a final order. 17.105.040 Criteria for determination of unfit dwellings, buildings, structures, or premises. A. Determination. The City Manager is hereby granted authority to determine if a dwelling, building, structure, or premises is unfit for human habitation or other use if he or she finds that one or more defects or conditions exist in such dwelling, building, structure, or premises which are dangerous or injurious to the health and safety of the occupants of such dwelling, building, structure, or premises, the occupants of neighboring dwellings or buildings, or other residents of the City as follows: 1. The defects or conditions meet one or more of the following: a. Whenever any door, aisle, passageway, stairway or other means of exit is not of sufficient width or size or is not so arranged as to provide safe and adequate means of exit in case of fire or panic; b. Whenever the walking surface of any aisle, passageway, stairway or other means of exit is so warped, worn, loose, torn or otherwise unsafe as to not provide safe and adequate means of exit in case of fire or panic; c. Whenever the stress in any materials, member or portion thereof, due to all dead and live loads, is more than one and one half times the working stress or stresses allowed in the Washington State building code, as now adopted in chapter 19.27 RCW and Title 51 WAC or hereafter amended for new buildings of similar structure, purpose or location; d. Whenever any portion thereof has been damaged by fire, earthquake, wind, flood or by any other cause, to such an extent that the structural strength or stability thereof Ordinance 18-002 Regulating Unfit Structures Page 4 of 16 DRAFT is materially less than it was before such catastrophe and is less than the minimum requirements of the Washington State building code, as now adopted in chapter 19.27 RCW and Title 51 WAC or hereafter amended for new building of similar structure, purpose or location; e. Whenever any portion or member of appurtenance thereof is likely to fail, or to become detached or dislodged, or to collapse and thereby injure persons or damage property; f. Wherever any portion of a building, or any member appurtenance or ornamentation on the exterior thereof is not of sufficient strength or stability, or is not so anchored, attached or fastened in place so as to be capable of resisting a wind pressure of one half of that specified in the Washington State building code, as now adopted in chapter 19.27 RCW and Title 51 WAC or hereafter amended for new building of similar structure, purpose or location, without exceeding the working stresses permitted in the Washington State building code, as now adopted in chapter 19.27 RCW and Title 51 WAC or hereafter amended for such buildings; g. Whenever any portion thereof has wracked, warped, buckled or settled to such an extent that walls or other structural portions have materially less resistance to winds or earthquakes than is required in the case of similar new construction; h. Wherever the building or structure, or any portion thereof, because of: (i) dilapidation, deterioration or decay; (ii) faulty construction; (iii) the removal, movement or instability of any portion of the ground necessary for the purpose of supporting such a building; (iv) the deterioration, decay or inadequacy of its foundation; or (v) any other cause, is likely to partially or completely collapse; i. Whenever, for any reason, the building or structure, or any portion thereof, is manifestly unsafe for the purpose for which it is being used; j. Whenever the exterior walls are not anchored to supporting and supported elements; are not plumb and free of holes, cracks or breaks and loose or rotting materials; or are not capable of supporting all nominal loads and resisting all load effects; k. Whenever the foundation systems are not firmly supported by footings, are not plumb and free from open cracks and breaks, are not properly anchored, or are capable of supporting all nominal loads and resisting all load effects; 1. Whenever roofing or roofing components that have defects that admit rain, roof surfaces with inadequate drainage or any portion of the roof framing that is not in good repair with signs of deterioration, fatigue or without proper anchorage and incapable of supporting all nominal loads and resisting all load effects; m. Wherever a building or structure, used or intended to be used for dwelling purposes, because of inadequate maintenance, dilapidation, decay, damage, faulty construction or arrangement, inadequate light, air or sanitation facilities, or otherwise, is determined by the building official, in consultation with the appropriate agency, to be unsanitary, Ordinance 18-002 Regulating Unfit Structures Page 5 of 16 DRAFT unfit for human habitation or in such a condition that is likely to cause sickness or disease; n. Whenever any building or structure, because of obsolescence, dilapidated condition, deterioration, damage, inadequate exits, lack of sufficient fire -resistive construction, faulty electric wiring, gas connections or heating apparatus, or other cause, is determined by the fire marshal to be a fire hazard; or o. Whenever any portion of a building or structure remains on a site after the demolition or destruction of the building or structure or whenever any building or structure is abandoned for a period in excess of six months so as to constitute such building or portion thereof an attractive nuisance or hazard to the public; or 2. The defect or condition otherwise substantially violates the standards and requirements set forth in the residential, property, and building codes adopted pursuant to chapter 24.40 SVMC, as the same now exist or may hereafter be amended. B. Nothing herein shall require the City Manager to determine a dwelling, building, structure, or premises is unfit for human habitation or other use or to require any particular remedy or abatement unless otherwise required by law. C. Standards for Determining Appropriate Remedial Action. 1. Once the City Manager has made a determination that conditions are such that a dwelling, building, structure, or premises is unfit for human habitation or other use, the City Manager shall determine the appropriate remedy for the dwelling, building, structure, or premises. The City Manager is hereby authorized to require any appropriate remedy determined necessary to eliminate the hazardous, injurious, or dangerous conditions or defects and to bring the dwelling, building, structure, or premises into compliance with the residential, property, and building codes adopted pursuant to chapter 24.40 SVMC, as the same now exist or may hereafter be amended. Remedies may include but are not limited to requiring repair, renovation, restoration, removal, demolition of, or requiring the person to vacate and close or secure the dwelling, building, structure, or premises. For purposes of this section, "secure" means boarding all door, window, and other entry points or, if boarding is not possible due to damage, causing the property to be secured by completely fencing off the property or defects or dangerous conditions with at least a six-foot tall fence. When determining the extent of the remedy required, including demolition, the City Manager shall give consideration to: (a) whether the conditions create an immediate or imminent threat to public health, safety, and welfare for the subject property and/or adjacent or nearby properties; (b) the cost of available remedies versus the value of the property. This factor shall weigh more in favor of demolition as the cost of the remedy increases in relation to the value of the property; (c) the length of time the condition has existed; and Ordinance 18-002 Regulating Unfit Structures Page 6 of 16 DRAFT (d) previous efforts by the owner or parties in interest to remedy the conditions. 2. Except as otherwise provided herein, a dwelling, building, structure, or premises that has been determined unfit for human habitation shall be demolished whenever the estimated cost of repair, renovation, restoration or other remedy exceeds 50 percent of the value of the dwelling, building, structure, or premises. 3. When a dwelling, building, structure, or premises has been determined to be unfit for human habitation or other use pursuant to SVMC 17.105.040(A) and has been ordered to be repaired, renovated, or restored, it shall be vacated and demolished if it has not been repaired, renovated, restored, or otherwise abated to such a degree to receive a written determination of habitability from the City Manager within six months after the date specified for completion of the required repair, renovation, or restoration, provided such date shall not exceed 18 months from the date of the final determination of unfitness, including any appeals of such determination. 4. The City Manager shall specify the timeline for (a) demolition of the unfit structure, if the structure is required to be demolished, or (b) other abatement required for structures in the determination of unfitness. 17.105.050 Right to Appeal. A. The following parties have standing to appeal an order of the City Manager to the Hearing Examiner: 1. The party in interest or owner of property subject to the order; and 2. The complainant if a written request is made to be notified of the City's response to the complaint filed by the complainant. B. An appeal of the City Manager's order may be filed within 30 days from the date of service. An appeal shall not be considered filed unless accompanied with the appropriate appeal fee and a complete appeal submittal. 17.105.060 Contents of an appeal to the Hearing Examiner. A. Each appeal to the Hearing Examiner shall include: 1. The case number designated by the City and the name of the parties in interest and owner of the property subject to the order; 2. The name and signature of each appellant or their authorized representative and a statement showing that each appellant has standing to file an appeal pursuant to SVMC 17.105.050. If multiple parties file a single appeal, the appeal shall designate one party as the contact representative; 3. The decision and specific portions of the decision or determination being appealed, and the reasons why each aspect is in error as a matter of fact or law; 4. Evidence that specific issues raised on appeal were raised during the hearing on the complaint or were timely submitted while the record was open if such issues could have Ordinance 18-002 Regulating Unfit Structures Page 7 of 16 DRAFT been raised; provided issues that were not ripe (such as issues raised in decision) need not have been raised; and 5. The appeal fee pursuant to chapter 17.110 SVMC, unless otherwise exempted. The fee may be refunded, either wholly or partially, if: (a) the appellant requests withdrawal of the appeal in writing at least 10 calendar days before the scheduled appeal hearing date; or (b) the appellant(s) successfully appeals the City's order, which refund shall occur within 45 days of the Hearing Examiner's decision. B. All complete appeals submitted and allowed pursuant to chapter 17.105 SVMC shall be scheduled for hearing before the Hearing Examiner. The hearing shall be scheduled to allow the Hearing Examiner to issue a final decision on the appeal within 60 days from the date of filing of the appeal. Hearings on an appeal shall be open to public view. C. Notice of the appeal hearing shall be provided at least 10 days in advance of the hearing, by first-class mail, postage prepaid, to the appellant(s), the other party in interest, or other owner of the property subject to the order, and complainant, if the complainant made a written request to be notified of the City's response to the complaint, and the Department. 1. Failure of a person entitled to receive notice does not affect the jurisdiction of the Hearing Examiner to hear the appeal when scheduled and render a decision, if the notice was properly mailed. 2. A person is deemed to have received notice if the person appears at the hearing, or submits written comments on the merits of the application, or if the person fails to object to the lack of notice promptly after the person obtains actual knowledge of the hearing date. 3. If required notice is not given and actual notice is not received, the Hearing Examiner may reschedule the hearing or keep the record open on the matter to receive additional evidence from the party or parties who did not receive notice. D. The filing of the appeal shall stay the order of the City Manager, except for temporary measures of an emergent nature that are required, such as securing the building to minimize any imminent danger to the public health or safety. 17.105.070 Hearing Examiner appeal procedures. A. The format of the appeal hearing shall be organized so that the testimony and written evidence may be presented quickly and efficiently. The format will generally be as follows: 1. A brief introduction of the matter by the Hearing Examiner; 2. A report by Department staff including introduction of the official file on the order and its procedural history, an explanation of the City Manager's determination, including the use of visual aids, and the recommendation of the Department on the appeal of the order; 3. The submittal of testimony and documents by or on behalf of the appellant(s), who have the burden of proof at the hearing; Ordinance 18-002 Regulating Unfit Structures Page 8 of 16 DRAFT 4. The submittal of testimony and documents by the Department and opposing parties; 5. Rebuttal; 6. Questions or requests for clarifications by the Hearing Examiner, and closing arguments; 7. Closure of the hearing; 8. Closure of the record and continuation of the matter for final decision. B. All reasonably probative evidence is admissible by the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner may exclude all evidence that is irrelevant, immaterial or unduly repetitious. The judicial rules of evidence are not generally applied, but may be used by the Hearing Examiner for guidance. The Hearing Examiner shall accord such weight to the evidence as he/she deems appropriate. C. Documentary evidence may be received in the form of copies or excerpts, or by incorporation by reference, at the Hearing Examiner's discretion. The Hearing Examiner may require that the original of a document be produced. A party submitting documentary material at the hearing shall make copies available at the hearing for review by the opposing party. D. The Hearing Examiner may take official notice of judicially cognizable facts; federal, state and local laws, ordinances or regulations; the City's Comprehensive Plan and other adopted plans or policies of the City; and general, technical and scientific facts within the Hearing Examiner's specialized knowledge; so long as any noticed facts are included in the record and referenced or are apparent in the Hearing Examiner's final decision. E. All testimony taken by the Hearing Examiner in an appeal pursuant to chapter 17.105 SVMC shall be under oath or affirmation. F. The Hearing Examiner may allow the cross-examination of witnesses. The Hearing Examiner is authorized to call witnesses and request written evidence in order to obtain the information necessary to make a decision. The Hearing Examiner may also request written information from or the appearance of a representative from any City department having an interest in or impacting the order on appeal. G. The Hearing Examiner may impose reasonable limitations on the number of witnesses to be heard and the nature and length of their testimony to avoid repetitious testimony, expedite the hearing or avoid continuation of the hearing. H. The Hearing Examiner may cause the removal of any person who is being disruptive to the proceedings, or continue the proceedings if order cannot be maintained. The Hearing Examiner shall first issue a warning if practicable. I. No testimony or oral statement regarding the substance or merits of an application is allowable after the close of the appeal hearing. No documentary material submitted after the close of hearing will be considered by the Hearing Examiner unless the Hearing Examiner has left the record open for the submittal of such material and all parties are given an additional time to review and rebut such material. Ordinance 18-002 Regulating Unfit Structures Page 9 of 16 DRAFT 17.105.080 Hearing Examiner appeals — reopening or continuing hearings. A. The Hearing Examiner may reopen or continue a hearing to take additional testimony or evidence, or other compelling cause, provided a final decision has not been entered. B. If the Hearing Examiner announces the time and place of the continued hearing on the record before the hearing is closed, no further notice is required. If the hearing is reopened after the close of the hearing, all parties shall be given at least five days' notice of the date, time, place and nature of the reopened hearing. C. Motions by a party for continuation or to reopen a hearing shall state the reasons therefor and be made as soon as reasonably possible. The motion shall be submitted in writing unless made at the hearing. The Hearing Examiner may continue or reopen a hearing on his/her own motion, citing the reasons therefor. D. If the decision of the Hearing Examiner rests upon issues of fact or law not raised by any party at time of hearing, the Hearing Examiner shall continue and/or reopen the hearing to a later date to allow the parties an opportunity to comment and/or present evidence on those issues of fact or law. 17.105.090 Hearing Examiner appeal — record of hearing. A. The Hearing Examiner shall establish and maintain a record of all proceedings and hearings conducted by the Hearing Examiner, including an electronic recording capable of being accurately transcribed and reproduced. Copies of the recording and any written portions of the record shall be made available to the public on request for the cost of reproduction or transcription, as determined by the Hearing Examiner. B. The record shall include, but is not limited to: 1. The City Manager's order and appeal submittal; 2. Department staff reports; 3. All evidence received or considered by the Hearing Examiner; 4. The final written decision of the Hearing Examiner; 5. Affidavits of notice for the hearing; 6. The electronic recordings of the hearings and proceedings by the Hearing Examiner; and 7. The departmental file for the order and appeal, if incorporated into the record by the Hearing Examiner. C. The Hearing Examiner may authorize a party to have the proceedings reported by a court reporter and have a stenographic transcription made at the party's expense. The Hearing Examiner may also cause the proceedings to be reported by a court reporter and transcribed. Ordinance 18-002 Regulating Unfit Structures Page 10 of 16 DRAFT D. The Hearing Examiner shall have custody of the hearing record and shall maintain such record until the period for appeal of the Hearing Examiner's final decision has expired or the record is transmitted to court pursuant to an appeal of the Hearing Examiner's final decision. 17.105.100 Hearing Examiner appeal — decision. A. The decision of the Hearing Examiner shall be in writing, include findings of fact and conclusions based on the record to support the decision, and shall bear the same legal consequences as if issued by the City Manager pursuant to SVMC 17.105.030. B. The Hearing Examiner shall render a final decision within 10 business days following the closure of the record, unless a longer time period is mutually agreed to in writing by the appellant and the Hearing Examiner; provided, the decision of the Hearing Examiner shall be issued within 60 days from the date of filing of the appeal. C. The Hearing Examiner shall report and provide notice of the decision by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the appellant(s) and to all parties and the Department by first class mail, postage prepaid. Any final order in the Hearing Examiner's decision shall be posted in a conspicuous location on the property that is the subject of the decision and appeal. A copy of the Hearing Examiner's decision shall be filed with the Spokane County Auditor. A transcript of the Hearing Examiner's decision, findings, and orders shall be made available to the appellant upon demand. D. The Hearing Examiner may affirm, modify, reverse, or return with directions, the City Manager's appealed order in the event he or she finds an error of law or the record is not supported by substantiated evidence. E. The Hearing Examiner's decision shall be subject to further review only in the manner and to the extent provided in SVMC 17.105.110 and 17.105.120. If it is not timely and correctly appealed pursuant to SVMC 17.105.110 or 17.105.120, the Hearing Examiner's decision shall be a final order. 17.105.110 Hearing Examiner appeal — reconsideration, clerical errors. A. Any aggrieved party of record may file a written petition for reconsideration with the Hearing Examiner within 10 calendar days following the date of the Hearing Examiner's written decision. The petitioner for reconsideration shall mail or otherwise provide a copy of the petition for reconsideration to all parties of record on the date of filing. The timely filing of a petition for reconsideration shall stay the Hearing Examiner's decision until such time as the petition has been disposed of in writing by the Hearing Examiner. B. The grounds for seeking reconsideration shall be limited to the following: 1. The Hearing Examiner exceeded the Hearing Examiner's jurisdiction; 2. The Hearing Examiner failed to follow the applicable procedure in reaching the Hearing Examiner' s decision; 3. The Hearing Examiner committed an error of law; Ordinance 18-002 Regulating Unfit Structures Page 11 of 16 DRAFT 4. The Hearing Examiner's findings, conclusions and/or conditions are not supported by the record; or 5. New evidence which could not reasonably have been produced and which is material to the decision is discovered. C. The petition for reconsideration shall: 1. Contain the name, mailing address, and daytime telephone number of the petitioner, or the petitioner's representative, together with the signature of the petitioner or of the petitioner' s representative; 2. Identify the specific findings, conclusions, actions, and/or conditions for which reconsideration is requested; 3. State the specific grounds upon which relief is requested; 4. Describe the specific relief requested; and 5. Where applicable, identify the specific nature of any newly discovered evidence or changes proposed. D. The petition for reconsideration shall be decided by the same Hearing Examiner who rendered the decision, if reasonably available. The Hearing Examiner shall provide notice of the decision on reconsideration the same manner as provided for a decision in SVMC 17.105.100. Within 14 days the Hearing Examiner shall: 1. Deny the petition in writing; 2. Grant the petition and issue an amended decision in accordance with the provisions of SVMC 17.105.100; 3. Accept the petition and give notice to all parties of record of the opportunity to submit written comment. Parties of record shall have five calendar days from the date of such notice in which to submit written comments. The Hearing Examiner shall either issue a decision in accordance with the provisions of SVMC 17.105.100, or issue an order within 10 days after the close of the comment period setting the matter for further hearing. If further hearing is ordered, the Hearing Examiner's office shall mail notice at least 10 days in advance of the hearing as provided in SVMC 17.105.060 to all parties of record; or 4. Accept the petition and set the matter for further open record hearing to consider new evidence, proposed changes in the application and/or the arguments of the parties. Notice of such further hearing shall be mailed by the Hearing Examiner's office at least 10 days in advance of the hearing as proved in SVMC 17.150.060 not less than 15 days prior to the hearing date to all parties of record. The Hearing Examiner shall issue a decision following the further hearing in accordance with the provisions of SVMC 17.105.100. E. A decision which has been subjected to the reconsideration process shall not again be subject to reconsideration; provided, that a decision which has been revised on reconsideration from any form of denial to any form of approval with preconditions and/or conditions shall be subject to reconsideration. Ordinance 18-002 Regulating Unfit Structures Page 12 of 16 DRAFT F. The Hearing Examiner may consolidate for action, in whole or in part, multiple petitions for reconsideration of the same decision where such consolidation would facilitate procedural efficiency. G. Clerical mistakes and errors arising from oversight or omission in Hearing Examiner decisions may be corrected by the Hearing Examiner at any time either on the Hearing Examiner's initiative or on the motion of a party of record. A copy of each page affected by the correction, with the correction clearly identified, shall be mailed to all parties of record. This shall not extend the appeal period from the decision. 17.105.120 Appeal to Superior Court. Any person affected by an order issued by the Hearing Examiner may, within 30 days after the date of service of the Hearing Examiner's order, appeal the Hearing Examiner's order to Spokane Superior Court or may petition the Superior Court for an injunction or other appropriate order restraining the City Manager from carrying out the provisions of the Hearing Examiner's order. Pursuant to RCW 35.80.030, in all such proceedings the court may affirm, reverse, or modify the order and the review shall be de novo. 17.105.130 Abatement. A. The order of the City Manager or the Hearing Examiner may prescribe times within which demolition or other abatement shall be commenced or completed. If the action is not commenced or completed within the prescribed time, or if no time is prescribed within the time limit for appealing, the City Manager may commence the required abatement action after having taken the legally required steps, if any, to gain entry. If satisfactory progress has been made and sufficient evidence is presented that the work will be completed within a reasonable time, the City Manager or the Hearing Examiner may extend the time for completion of the work, subject to immediate summary revocation at any time without further hearing if satisfactory progress is not being made. B. If the owner is unable to comply with the City Manager's or the Hearing Examiner's order within the time required, and the time for appeals to the Hearing Examiner or petition to the court has passed, the owner may, for good and sufficient cause beyond his or her control, request an extension of time in writing supported by affidavit. The City Manager or Hearing Examiner may grant a reasonable extension of time after finding that the delay was beyond the control of the owner. There shall be no appeal or petition from the denial of an extension of time. C. Any work, including demolition, construction, repairs, or alterations required pursuant to SVMC 17.105, shall be subject to all permitting requirements of the City. 17.105.140 Abatement by the City. A. If the parties of interest or owner, following exhaustion of his or her rights of appeal, fails to comply with a final order issued pursuant to chapter 17.105 SVMC to repair, alter, improve, vacate, close, remove, or demolish the dwelling, building, structure, or premises, or fails to take other required action, the City Manager may direct or cause such dwelling, building, structure, or premises to be repaired, altered, improved, vacated, and closed, removed, demolished, or to abate such other conditions which render the dwelling, building, structure, or premises unfit for human habitation or other use as identified in the order and to take such further steps as may be reasonable and necessary to prevent access to the structure or premises, for public health or safety reasons, pending abatement. Ordinance 18-002 Regulating Unfit Structures Page 13 of 16 DRAFT B. The City may seek a judicial abatement order from Spokane County superior court to abate a condition which continues to be a violation of chapter 17.105 SVMC, or which, pursuant to a final order or Hearing Examiner decision issued pursuant to chapter 17.105 SVMC, has been determined to be a dwelling, building, structure, or premises that is unfit for human habitation or other use. 17.105.150 Abatement Costs. A. The amount of the cost of any abatement conducted pursuant to SVMC 17.105.140, including actual abatement expenses, reasonable legal fees and costs, administrative personnel costs, penalties, all other related expenses and costs, such as costs of notices, contracting, or inspections, costs of appeal of any decision pursuant to SVMC 17.105.050, and court costs, shall be paid by the parties in interest or owner of the property. If the parties in interest or owner of the property fail to timely pay such costs, the costs shall be assessed against the real property upon which such cost was incurred. The costs of abatement shall be certified by the City Finance City Manager to the Spokane County Treasurer as an amount due and owing to the City, pursuant to RCW 35.80.030, to be entered by the Spokane County Treasurer as an assessment upon the tax rolls against the property for the current year and shall become a part of the general taxes for that year to be collected at the same time and with interest at such rates and in such manner as is provided in RCW 84.56.020 as the same now exists or may hereafter be amended, for delinquent taxes, and when collected to be deposited to the credit of the City's general fund. B. If the City removes, or demolishes a dwelling, building, structure, or premises pursuant to SVMC 17.105.140, the City shall, if possible, sell the materials from the dwelling, building, structure or premises. The proceeds of the sale of any materials shall be credited against the cost of removal or demolition, and if there is any balance remaining, such balance shall be paid to the parties entitled thereto, after deducting the costs incident thereto. C. The assessment shall constitute a lien against the property which shall be of equal rank with state, county, and municipal taxes pursuant to RCW 35.80.030(h). D. For purposes of this section, the cost of abatement shall include the amount of any relocation assistance payments that were advanced by the City pursuant to RCW 59.18.085 and which have not been repaid and any and all penalties and interest that accrue as a result of the failure of the property owner to timely repay the amount of these relocation assistance payments pursuant to RCW 59.18.085. E. The City Manager may modify the time or methods of payment of such expenses as the condition of the property and the circumstances of the owner may warrant. In cases of extreme hardship, such expenses may be waived pursuant to an appropriate written finding by the City Manager. 17.105.160 Supplemental Chapter. Nothing in chapter 17.105 SVMC shall be construed to abrogate or impair the powers of the courts or of any department of the City to enforce any provisions of its ordinances or regulations or to prevent or punish violations of such ordinances or regulations; and the powers conferred by chapter 17.105 SVMC shall be in addition and supplemental to the powers conferred by any other statute or ordinance. 17.105.170 Nuisances: Powers reserved. Ordinance 18-002 Regulating Unfit Structures Page 14 of 16 DRAFT Nothing in chapter 17.105 SVMC shall be construed to impair or limit in any way the City's power to define and declare nuisances and to cause their removal or abatement by summary proceedings or otherwise. 17.105.180 Appeal to Superior Court. A. A decision pursuant to SVMC 17.105.100 shall be considered an "order" for purposes of this chapter. B. An order issued pursuant to this chapter 17.105 SVMC may be appealed to Washington State Superior Court solely as allowed by law. 17.105.190 Emergencies. The provisions of chapter 17.105 SVMC shall not prevent the City Manager or any other officer or agency of the City of Spokane Valley from taking any other action, summary or otherwise, necessary to eliminate or minimize an imminent danger to the health or safety of any person or property. 17.105.200 Discrimination. All proceedings under chapter 17.105 SVMC shall be subject to the anti -discrimination provisions of RCW 35.80.040 as the same now exists or may hereafter be amended. Section 3. Amendment. SVMC 17.90.010 is hereby amended as follows: A. Appeals and Jurisdiction. All final decisions shall be appealed pursuant to SVMC Table 17.90- 1. Specific procedures followed by the Planning Commission, Hearing Examiner, and City Council are set forth in Appendix B. Table 17.90-1— Decision/Appeal Authority Land Use and Development Decisions Appeal Authority Type I and II decisions Hearing Examiner (SVMC 17.90.040); further appeal to superior court (Chapter 36.70C RCW) Building permits Hearing Examiner (SVMC 17.90.040); further appeal to superior court (Chapter 36.70C RCW) Type III decisions except zoning map amendments Superior court (Chapter 36.70C RCW) Type III zoning map amendments City council (SVMC 17.90.070); further appeal to superior court (Chapter 36.70C RCW) Type IV decisions Superior court Matters subject to review pursuant to RCW 36.70A.020 Growth Management Hearings Board Shoreline substantial development permits, shoreline conditional use permits, and shoreline variances Shoreline Hearings Board (RCW 90.58.180) Ordinance 18-002 Regulating Unfit Structures Page 15 of 16 DRAFT Table 17.90-1— Decision/Appeal Authority Land Use and Development Decisions Appeal Authority Compliance and enforcement decisions (Chapter 17.100 SVMC) Hearing Examiner (SVMC 17.90.040); further appeal to superior court (Chapter 36.70C RCW) Order of dwelling, building, structure, or Hearing Examiner (SVMC 17.105.050) pursuant to the premises unfit for human habitation or other appeal procedures set forth in chapter 17.105 SVMC; further use (Chapter 17.105 SVMC) appeal to superior court (SVMC 17.105.120) Section 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase in this Ordinance. Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provided by law. Passed by the City Council this day of , 2018. City of Spokane Valley ATTEST: L.R. Higgins, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 18-002 Regulating Unfit Structures Page 16 of 16 Proposed Regulations for Abatement of Unfit Dwellings, Buildings, and Structures Cary Driskell City Attorney, City of Spokane Valley Erik Lamb Deputy City Attorney, City of Spokane Valley January 9, 2018 City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney r City Nuisance Process for all types of nuisances. • Primary goal is voluntary compliance. • But if needed, City will abate nuisances and seek full cost recovery. Requires Court Order finding nuisance and authorizing abatement and collection of costs. City collects costs through lien placed on property. First $2,000 is priority lien of equal rank with state and local taxes. Remainder is subject to any prior liens, including mortgages. Current process makes it challenging for recovery of costs in large abatements, such as demolition of unfit structures. City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney Sfate law option —chapter 35.80 RCW Alternative abatement process for unfit dwellings, unfit buildings, and unfit structures. Solely relates to unfit dwellings, unfit buildings, and unfit structures. Primary benefit - Allows City to recover all costs of abatement of unfit dwellings, buildings, and structures as priority lien of equal rank with state and local taxes. Requires specific procedures. Procedures are similar, but still different from current City enforcement process. Requires City to adopt ordinance specifying the procedures. City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney mpies City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney 4 Examples City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney Pictures from Spokane Valley Fire Department 5 Ordinance 1\1-0:1-8'-=002 Tracks requirements of RCW 35.80. Creates new chapter 17.105 SVMC. Designates City Manager or designee as the "improvement officer." • Building Official likely designee. Conducts preliminary investigation to determine unfitness, issues complaint, conducts initial hearing on determination, and issues final administrative order finding structure unfit for use. Designates Hearing Examiner as "appeals commission" with authority to hear appeals of the improvement officer's final order. Provides procedures for conducting appeals. City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney Proposed Ordinance No. 18-002 Specifies criteria for determining when dwellings, buildings, and structures are unfit. See proposed section 17.1o5.o4o(A). Largely tracks building codes. Specifies criteria for determining the appropriate remedial action. See proposed section r7.1o5.o4o(C). Ranges from repairs to securing structures to demolition. City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney Proposed Ordinance No. 18-002 Authorizes City abatement of unfit dwellings, unfit buildings, and unfit structures where voluntary compliance is not achieved. Authorizes City to recover all costs for abatement of unfit dwellings, unfit buildings, and unfit structures. All costs recovered for abatement of unfit dwellings, buildings, and structures may be assessed against the property and the assessment constitutes a lien against the property which is of equal rank with state, county, and municipal taxes. City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney Questions? City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney 9 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 9, 2018 Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ information ['admin. report Department Director Approval: ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed Resolution #18-001: Authorization of qualified public depositories the City may conduct financial transactions with, and Councilmembers and City officers with signing authority. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 3.55.010. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: No action has been taken. BACKGROUND: SVMC 3.55.010 requires that the City Council authorize by resolution which qualified financial depositories (banks) the City may use to make payments on claims or obligations, and who has authority to sign checks for the City. OPTIONS: Adopt Resolution #18-001 by motion; request additional information. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move to approve Resolution #18-001 declaring which qualified public depositories the City is authorized to conduct financial transactions with, and declaring which Councilmembers and City officers have signing authority on behalf of the City. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: This action will result in no additional out-of-pocket costs to the City. STAFF CONTACT: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: Resolution #18-001 DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 18-001 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DECLARING WHICH QUALIFIED PUBLIC DEPOSITORIES THE CITY IS AUTHORIZED TO CONDUCT FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS WITH, DECLARING WHICH COUNCIL MEMBERS AND CITY OFFICERS HAVE SIGNING AUTHORITY PURSUANT TO SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE 3.55.010; REPEALING RESOLUTION 17-001, AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, the City Council has authority, pursuant to Spokane Valley Municipal Code 3.55.010 to declare by resolution which qualified public depositories the City may use to pay its claims or obligations, and to declare three Councilmembers and those City officers who are authorized to make payments on claims or obligations of the City; and WHEREAS, it is necessary from time -to -time to update which qualified financial depositories the City does its banking with, as well as to update those Councilmembers and City officers who are authorized to sign checks on behalf of the City at those depositories or otherwise conduct the financial affairs of the City. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, as follows: Section 1. Authorized Qualified Public Depositories for Making Payments on Claims or Obligations of the City. The City of Spokane Valley is authorized to use Banner Bank, Mountain West Bank, Umpqua Bank and other public depositories as listed on the Washington Public Deposit Protection Commission listing of approved banks, for public deposits, checks, and making fund transfers to and from accounts. Section 2. Councilmembers Designated to Have Signature Authority at Qualified Financial Depositories for Making Payments on Claims or Obligations of the City. Pursuant to SVMC 3.55.010, the following Councilmembers are given signing authority on behalf of the City to make payments on claims or obligations of the City: L.R. Higgins Pam Haley Arne Woodard Section 3. City Officers Designated to Have Signature Authority at Qualified Financial Depositories for Making Payments on Claims or Obligations of the City and Investing Public Monies. Pursuant to SVMC 3.55.010, the following City Officers are given signing authority on behalf of the City to make payments on claims or obligations of the City, to invest its public monies with the Local Government Investment Pool, and make all appropriate transfers related thereto: Mark Calhoun, City Manager Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director Dan Duffey, Accounting Manager Resolution 18-001 Declaring Banking Authority Page 1 of 2 DRAFT Section 4. Repeal. Resolution 17-001 is hereby repealed in its entirety. Section 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. PASSED by the City Council of Spokane Valley, Washington this 9`'' day of January, 2018. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY L.R. Higgins, Mayor ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Resolution 18-001 Declaring Banking Authority Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 9, 2018 Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ information ['admin. report Department Director Approval: ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Lodging Tax Funds. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: State Law RCW 67.28, and Spokane Valley Municipal Code 3.20 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: During 2017 the Council was presented with information pertaining to lodging tax on four separate occasions: • July 18th where we discussed: o Lodging tax in general — what it is and how it may be expended. o The Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC) — what it is and its role in the process. o The Council's role in the process. o Council goals and priorities for the LTAC. • August 8th — where Council discussed and reached consensus on the goals and priorities that should be included in the lodging tax grant application and also communicated to the LTAC. • November 14th — where Council heard an administrative report on the 2018 recommended lodging tax grant allocations from the LTAC. o At this meeting, Council approved a motion to conduct an independent review and develop its own proposed distribution of lodging tax revenues. • November 21st — where Council passed a motion to approve its own proposed distribution of lodging tax revenues which was then forwarded to the LTAC for review and comment. BACKGROUND: In 2003 the City implemented a 2% hotel/motel tax, the proceeds of which are used to promote conventions and tourist travel to our City. The organizations to which the tax proceeds are distributed are ultimately determined by the City Council which receives a recommendation from the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC). The LTAC is comprised of five members who are appointed by the City Council. The LTAC membership must include: • At least two representatives of businesses that are required to collect the tax, • At least two people who are involved in activities that are authorized to be funded by the tax, and • One elected city official who serves as chairperson of the LTAC. The LTAC makes its recommendations based upon a combination of written application materials and a presentation that is made to them by each applicant. On October 19, 2017, the LTAC met to consider application materials and presentations from applicants seeking a portion of the $572,000 appropriated in the City's 2018 Budget. Prior to applicant presentations, the LTAC passed a motion that $250,000 be deducted from the available Lodging Tax funds for distribution in 2018 and have those funds moved into the 1.3% Lodging Tax Fund account dedicated for a large sports venue or venues for tourism facilities that generate overnight guests and recommended that this motion be provided for the Council's approval. This left $322,000 of the $572,000 available in the 2018 Budget to be recommended for awards to the applicants. 1 Presentations were made by the City of Spokane Valley Parks and Recreation Department, Spokane Oktoberfest, Crave NW, Spokane Valley Heritage Museum, Spokane County Fair and Expo Center, Spokane Sports Commission, HUB Sports Center, Valleyfest, Valleyfest Cycle Celebration, and Visit Spokane. Following applicant presentations, the LTAC discussed both the merits of making particular awards to various applicants and how they felt revenues should be allocated. Ultimately, the LTAC recommended the following awards be advanced to the City Council for consideration: 1) City of Spokane Valley Parks and Recreation 238,000 0 2) Spokane Oktoberfest 20,000 4,200 3) Crave NW 50,000 2,000 4) Spokane Valley Heritage Museum 25,000 4,400 5) Spokane Co Fair and Expo - Interstate Fair 60,000 50,000 6) Spokane Sports Commission 200,000 136,800 7) HUB Sports Center 54,000 48,400 8) Valleyfest 150,000 3,000 9) Valleyfest Cycle Celebration 25,000 1,400 10) Visit Spokane 282,830 71,800 1,104,830 322,000 At times some organizations apply for funding through both the Outside Agency and the Lodging Tax award processes. Valleyfest and the Spokane Valley Heritage Museum both applied for Lodging Tax Funding for 2018, as well as for 2018 Outside Agency funding, and were awarded $28,1225 and $3,500, respectively, in Outside Agency funding at the October 24, 2017 Council meeting. In previous years the HUB has at times availed itself of this option. Other issues: Since the LTAC meeting on October 19, the City has received questions from a member of the public regarding the recommendation process, and alleging that there may have been violations of the Open Public Meetings Act (OPMA) (chapter 42.30 RCW) by the LTAC. The OPMA requires all meetings of the LTAC to be conducted in public. City staff has conducted some cursory investigations into the questions raised, but has not done an extensive review of what may have occurred. Three Options for City Council: The Washington Legislature amended RCW 67.28.1816 in 2013 to provide that "the municipality may choose only recipients from the list of candidates and recommended amounts provided by the local lodging tax advisory committee." With this change, the options for City Council action have been viewed as primarily being limited to either (1) approving some or all of the listed recipients and amounts recommended by the LTAC or (2) not approving any recipients and having the LTAC revise its recommendation for further City Council action. 2 Amount LTAC Applicant Requested Recommend 1) City of Spokane Valley Parks and Recreation 238,000 0 2) Spokane Oktoberfest 20,000 4,200 3) Crave NW 50,000 2,000 4) Spokane Valley Heritage Museum 25,000 4,400 5) Spokane Co Fair and Expo - Interstate Fair 60,000 50,000 6) Spokane Sports Commission 200,000 136,800 7) HUB Sports Center 54,000 48,400 8) Valleyfest 150,000 3,000 9) Valleyfest Cycle Celebration 25,000 1,400 10) Visit Spokane 282,830 71,800 1,104,830 322,000 At times some organizations apply for funding through both the Outside Agency and the Lodging Tax award processes. Valleyfest and the Spokane Valley Heritage Museum both applied for Lodging Tax Funding for 2018, as well as for 2018 Outside Agency funding, and were awarded $28,1225 and $3,500, respectively, in Outside Agency funding at the October 24, 2017 Council meeting. In previous years the HUB has at times availed itself of this option. Other issues: Since the LTAC meeting on October 19, the City has received questions from a member of the public regarding the recommendation process, and alleging that there may have been violations of the Open Public Meetings Act (OPMA) (chapter 42.30 RCW) by the LTAC. The OPMA requires all meetings of the LTAC to be conducted in public. City staff has conducted some cursory investigations into the questions raised, but has not done an extensive review of what may have occurred. Three Options for City Council: The Washington Legislature amended RCW 67.28.1816 in 2013 to provide that "the municipality may choose only recipients from the list of candidates and recommended amounts provided by the local lodging tax advisory committee." With this change, the options for City Council action have been viewed as primarily being limited to either (1) approving some or all of the listed recipients and amounts recommended by the LTAC or (2) not approving any recipients and having the LTAC revise its recommendation for further City Council action. 2 Since the amendments in 2013, the City Council has not approved the amounts and required the LTAC to revise its recommendation once (for the 2015 fiscal year awards) and otherwise approved the recipients and amounts recommended by the LTAC every other year. However, given the questions raised by the public and the desire to ensure that the integrity of the process remains intact, City staff believe a possible third option exists. Under RCW 67.28.1817, a municipality may propose "a change in the use of revenue received under [RCW 67.28]," but must submit the proposal to the LTAC for review and comment. Then, the LTAC must be given at least 45 days to review and provide comments prior to final action by the municipality. Specifically, the LTAC should provide comments that "include an analysis of the extent to which the proposal will accommodate activities for tourists or increase tourism, and the extent to which the proposal will affect the long-term stability of the [lodging tax fund]." Since RCW 67.28.1817 must be read in harmony with RCW 67.28.1816, staff believes that after the LTAC makes its recommendation, the City Council may conduct its own review of the materials submitted, including the minutes and recommended amounts by the LTAC, to come up with its own proposed distribution of the revenue for any of the applicants, which may be the same or different from the LTAC recommendation. If it is different, the City must give the LTAC 45 days to review and provide comments on the proposed revised distribution before taking final action. City Council Review and Proposal: At the November 14, 2017, Council meeting, Council approved a motion to pursue option three and for Council to conduct an independent review and develop its own proposed distribution of the lodging tax revenues at its November 21, 2017 meeting. The following process was followed to develop Council's proposed distribution at that meeting: 1. Council reviewed written application materials from the applicants included as part of the LTAC recommendation, minutes from the LTAC meeting on October 19, 2017, and the LTAC recommended award allocation and withholding of $250,000 for capital purposes prior to the November 21, 2017 meeting. 2. During the meeting on November 21, 2017, Council made various motions for a proposed distribution of lodging tax revenues. City staff recorded the motions on an excel spreadsheet during the meeting. 3. There was opportunity for discussion of the motion, including public comment, once a motion received a second. 4. Once Council reached consensus on a motion and the motion was passed by a majority of Councilmembers, City Council was required to provide the LTAC 45 days to hold a public meeting in the City Council Chambers where they will review and comment on the proposed distribution of lodging tax revenues prior to final action, since the proposal was different than the LTAC's recommended allocation. As the City Council proposal was different than the LTAC recommendation, the earliest point for final action is the January 9, 2018 Council meeting. This process concluded with Council passing a motion to approve the following proposed distribution of lodging tax revenues: 3 1) City of Spokane Valley Parks and Recreation 2) Spokane Oktoberfest 3) Crave NW 4) Spokane Valley Heritage Museum 238,000 20,000 50,000 25,000 0 4,200 2,000 4,400 0 10,000 30,000 13,000 5) Spokane Co Fair and Expo - Interstate Fair 60,000 50,000 50,000 6) Spokane Sports Commission 200,000 136,800 80,000 7) HUB Sports Center 54,000 48,400 48,400 8) Valleyfest 150,000 3,000 18,600 9) Valleyfest Cycle Celebration 25,000 1,400 2,000 10) Visit Spokane 282,830 71,800 70,000 1,104,830 322,000 322,000 Proposed Transfer to Fund #104 250,000 250,000 Total Available in 2018 Budget 572,000 572,000 The LTAC met to review and provide comments on Council's proposal on December 19, 2017, at a public meeting held in Council Chambers. The minutes from that meeting are included as an attachment to this agenda item and serve as a record of the LTAC's comments on the proposal. OPTIONS: The City Council may approve the applicants and the amounts from Council's proposed distribution of lodging tax revenues or take other action if deemed appropriate. If changes are made to the proposal, it would require another 45 days for the LTAC to provide additional review and comment. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move to deduct $250,000 from the available Lodging Tax funds for distribution in 2018 and move those funds into the 1.3% Lodging Tax Fund account dedicated for a large sports venue or venues for tourism facilities that generate overnight guests; and to make the following allocation of Lodging Tax funds for calendar year 2018: Spokane Oktoberfest - $10,000 Crave NW - $30,000 Spokane Valley Heritage Museum - $13,000 Spokane County Fair & Expo - Interstate Fair - $50, 000 Spokane Sports Commission - $80, 000 HUB Sports Center - $48,400 Valleyfest - $18,600 Valleyfest Cycle Celebration - $2, 000 Visit Spokane - $70,000 BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The 2018 Proposed Budget includes total revenues of $581,000 including $580,000 of lodging taxes. Total expenditures are budgeted at $602,000 including $30,000 to offset advertising at CenterPlace and up to $572,000 to be allocated 4 Amount LTAC Council Applicant Requested Recommend Proposal 1) City of Spokane Valley Parks and Recreation 2) Spokane Oktoberfest 3) Crave NW 4) Spokane Valley Heritage Museum 238,000 20,000 50,000 25,000 0 4,200 2,000 4,400 0 10,000 30,000 13,000 5) Spokane Co Fair and Expo - Interstate Fair 60,000 50,000 50,000 6) Spokane Sports Commission 200,000 136,800 80,000 7) HUB Sports Center 54,000 48,400 48,400 8) Valleyfest 150,000 3,000 18,600 9) Valleyfest Cycle Celebration 25,000 1,400 2,000 10) Visit Spokane 282,830 71,800 70,000 1,104,830 322,000 322,000 Proposed Transfer to Fund #104 250,000 250,000 Total Available in 2018 Budget 572,000 572,000 The LTAC met to review and provide comments on Council's proposal on December 19, 2017, at a public meeting held in Council Chambers. The minutes from that meeting are included as an attachment to this agenda item and serve as a record of the LTAC's comments on the proposal. OPTIONS: The City Council may approve the applicants and the amounts from Council's proposed distribution of lodging tax revenues or take other action if deemed appropriate. If changes are made to the proposal, it would require another 45 days for the LTAC to provide additional review and comment. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move to deduct $250,000 from the available Lodging Tax funds for distribution in 2018 and move those funds into the 1.3% Lodging Tax Fund account dedicated for a large sports venue or venues for tourism facilities that generate overnight guests; and to make the following allocation of Lodging Tax funds for calendar year 2018: Spokane Oktoberfest - $10,000 Crave NW - $30,000 Spokane Valley Heritage Museum - $13,000 Spokane County Fair & Expo - Interstate Fair - $50, 000 Spokane Sports Commission - $80, 000 HUB Sports Center - $48,400 Valleyfest - $18,600 Valleyfest Cycle Celebration - $2, 000 Visit Spokane - $70,000 BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The 2018 Proposed Budget includes total revenues of $581,000 including $580,000 of lodging taxes. Total expenditures are budgeted at $602,000 including $30,000 to offset advertising at CenterPlace and up to $572,000 to be allocated 4 through this award process. The $572,000 includes the $322,000 of recommended awards by the LTAC as well as $250,000 the LTAC recommended for the Council to deduct from the available funds for the award distributions for 2018 and transfer that amount into the 1.3% Lodging Tax Fund account dedicated for a large sports venue or venues for tourism facilities. Total expenditures are expected to exceed total revenues by $21,000 and this will be offset through the use of a portion of the fund balance. The fund balance at the conclusion of 2018 is expected to be $145,290 which should be adequate to cover cash flow needs. STAFF CONTACT: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director; and Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney ATTACHMENTS: • Minutes of December 19, 2017, Lodging Tax Advisory Committee meeting. • E-mail with comments from Bill Ames, LTAC member • LTAC Recommendation and Council's Proposed Distribution 5 VIINt1TI-:4 Spokane 'Valley Lodging Tax Advisory Committee 'Thursday, I) ece in her 19, 2017 8:30 a.m. Spokane Valley City I Iall Council Chambers 10210 1 -:ash. Sprague Ave uc ttendance: Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Members: Chair: Corrncilmenber Sam Wood Ler; Cameron, Mir beau Park Hole( Scott Peterson, Spokane County Fair Board Colleen Heirs elman, Hampton Inn Suites rttrsr'rrf: Pill /Imes, the. HUB Others in attendance, about .15 in the audience Stair ChcLsie 'Taylor, !finance Director Sarah Farr, Accounting Technician Erik Lamb, ,t tepid a City Attorney Mike Stone, P& R Director Tian Crrcgcr-,xrur, Adrian- A,sSki61111 Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk (:uitnc:ilmembcr Wood opened the meeting at 8:30 a.m., welcomed eveiyone, and then turned the meeting over to Finance Director Taylor and Deputy City Attorney Latish- Via their PowerPoint presentation, Director Taylor went over the October 19, 2017 recommended alloeatious from the LTAC, followed by Deputy City Attorney Lamb explaining about the public question regarding the integrity or the LTAC process and the Open Public Meeting Act, and the three options for City Council. Mr. Lamb went over those options fir Council: (1) In approve all or seams oaf the listed recipients recommended by the ',TAC; (2) deny the entire recommendation and require the LTAC to re -review and develop new allocation recommendation; and (3) that. Council review all submitted materials including the LTAC minutes and LTAC recommended allocation, and develop its own proposed distribution, which may be the same or different from the 1.'1 AC recommendation. Ma-, lamb said Council choose option 3, Mr. Lamb further explained that RCW 67.28.1817 allows municipalities to make a "change in use (If revenue" but to dos so must allow the 1,TAC 45 days to review and provide continents; that it must be read in harmony with the requirements of RCW 67.28.1816, and that Council may make an independent review nr idl the relevant materials, then rnaakc its own proposed distribution. Mr, Lamb stated that at its November 14, 2017 meeting, Council determined to go with option three to unsurr: transparency in the process and public conficience, and at that November 14 meeting, Council determined a new proposed allocution. Mr. Lamb said that the 45 -day tinning wilt he met counting from November 22 to January (w, and that Council will consider the LTAC comments from today's meeting, as well as the other materials, at its January 9, 2018 meeting, where e it is anticipated Council will take. final action on their proposed allocation, and at which time public comment will be permitted. Director Taylor went over the proposed allocations as shown on slide 8, and said tile main changes were to Oktoberkest, Crave, the Museum, Sports Commission, Valleyfest and Cycle Celebration. Mr. Lamb noted that today's LTAC meeting is for the. LTAC members to review Council's proposed distribution, but is not intended to be an opportunity for a new recommendation from LTAC; but is more about problems or benefits with Council's proposal as opposed in the original proposal; and if [.-I'AC members want to vote an a message to provide Council, that is also an option. Ms. Taylor noted that Mr. Ames was not able to attend today's meeting, hut she met with hint and he provided her with ointments, which she will include in Council's packet material 1 -or their Januar- 9 meeting. Chair Wood opened the floor for comments from committee members. Mr. rmhers- Iver- Cameron said he would prefer the option that they get In re -allocate as opposed lo, fust comment, but given the. position of the Council, he would be happy to comment. IIe said he feels the distribution LTAC provided, including his allocations, represent a well -thought out and sincere reconunendation to Council; LTAC Meeting Minutes December 19, 21)11 Page 1 of 3 said( :o uncil needs to keep in mind the set aside of `1250,0{10 and the 1.TA[' comments over the last several years regarding the importance of a sports complex and/or other tourism related facilities that would benefit the aortic. Community; Tram a lodging perspective and others in tourism, Iii said a spores fi ility is probably the largest market segment we benefit from in the valley, and we are losing some of that market share to other venues, and the hoteliers will see some drop in the zrycrvw room rates as well as occupancy; said we would then start fighting over the same pieces of pie without a great deal of economic itnpact development; said that many years have seen the idea discussed of a major sports complex in the valley, but we are running out of time.; said he's a member of number of hoards and he hears urgency regarding the development of sports facilities; said the set aside is an opportunity for Council to work closer with the and other committees to use the studies recently concluded; Bald there has also been the issue that a. complex could include a number of activities with school districts, and said that all the valley school districts support tFrc concept and would benefit from such a complex and would have an opportunity to use these facilities as opposed to one being located downtown; he said the infrastructure quality of our city gives opportunity to develop facilities where people went to he; that we are. a I imily-olientcd community; and if we don't continue down that path, we will all regret it and we need to elevate the time frame; and he encouraged Council to continue with the set-aside when they take up their next vote. Regarding the allocation of C'ounci I, Mr, {'arnernn said he is not sure if he needs to cn itinient except that he felt the original allocation was the proper one and he hates to see things done in a political or business environment where people have ler move off a position when its well thought out and provided sincerely, without there really being any violations. Ms. Heinse[rnaa said she agrees with Mr- Cameron in the desire to keep the S250,000 which Council also agreed on; said she spent hours the weekend before Lhc presenlatinn last. I.irne trying to decide on the numbers, and she thought those numbers were justified, and said she sticks with her original recommendation. Mr. Peterson said he spent a lot of time trying to understand the process and how it carne together, and he believes the allocations he provided and suhrrritted is what he will stand hy today; said he looked at Council's re -allocation and spent time again this morning,, and understands the LTAC is not able to re- allocate; said the only re, -allocation he disagrees with Council on is Val[eyfest; and stated again he believes LTAC made tate right decision; said he will support Mr. Cameron's comments as they relate to rite 5250,000 transfer to Fund 104, and will. support Council's recommendation as it stands. ChairWood said he also agrees with the S250,0O[] scat -aside; said he compromised on a couple of the allocations he made when this came before Council; said he supports Va[[eyfest more than this committee; and agreed with Council on a couple other adjustments and feel they are good allocations, Mr. Wood said he is. a little sad this process had to he re -dune and he appreciates the due diligence and respects the work of this committee; but there were some citizen concerns so Council needed to review this; .said he hopes that is now remedied with the acijusimcnL, and he thanked the Committee members for their work; that he is sorry this had to come back again without any further changes, which he said in his opinion, they have 49 right to make, but this is the proecss they have to live with; said htrpendly the citizens will be satisfied with the due process and everything in the open. Mr. Wood said personally he hopes the power of this committee is respected going forward and lhirt any problems that may have occurred have been remedied, ciI.herwk-e, said we will undermine this committee and the people will likely be reluctant to serve on it; said a sports facility is very important. in the valley; that Garth 9Bronks generated millions of dollars lire Spokane as a result of his concerts, and if we had some sort of facility to compete, he believes we could do the same dying; but you need money; said he personally would not object to putting more money in that fund. Mr, Wood said that Valleyfest offers a community spirit even if not ]reads in beds, and creates a great environment, which is one of Council's objectives and that needs to be weighed as well.. LTAC Meeting Minutes December 19, 2017.Page 2 of 3 Mr. Lamb again wont over the next steps; that Council will take this matter up during their January 9 meeting, at which there will be oppottLuiity for time public comment; said the sports facility or use of the fiord for a capital facility is at the Iorcfnmt of many minds, and he would anticipate working to bring something forward to discuss this more with the LTAC and Council togcthor; and that there well likely be meetings earlier in 2018 rather than the normal process iti the fall- Director Taylor added that if committee members have questions, to feel free to contact her, Mr. Lamb, or Ms. Fart. Ms..Hcinsclman said she understands that Valleyfest is a local festival; but the biggest thing that cats at her, is holding them accountable; said they were tole] they would have support and that they should become self- sullicient, aincl said she would like to see them move in that direction and quit looking at other people for help; said she thinks Valleyfest could be great if they take into cxmwidcratiift, the tithe of year, and get a board to help it become something Lhait could bring heads in beds; said there is growth potential but valley rest has been stagnant for a long time. it was moved by Mr. Carerora, , ecoaded and unanimously agreed to adjourn, The meeting adiourncd apt 8:55 a.m. Respectfully subrillcd, (In -is Bainbridge, City Clerk LTAC ivIccling Minutes December 19, 2017 Page 3 of 3 Chelsie Taylor From: Chelsie Taylor Sent: Tuesday, January 2r 2018 12;46 PM To; 'amesbballkacomcastrict' Subject: RE Confirm Communication to LTAC for Dec. 19th Meeting We spoke on the phone prior to the December 19th LTAC meeting regarding my email below, and you were in agreement with the statement 1 made in the below email. Unless I hear back from you otherwise, I will include this email string as your statement as a member of the LTAC regarding Council's proposed allocation, and it will become part of the public record. Thanks, aleIsle Taylor, CPA 1 Finanen Dirnotar 10210 E. Sprague Avenue 1 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 720-5040 1 ctavloiltapokonevalleu-ori n .M..1I Jr This email and any attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to Washington State's Public Record Act, chapter 42-56 RCW. Frorrim, Chelsie Taylor Sent: "Thursday, December 14, 2017 1;59 PM To! 'ameshball0 comcast.net'.amesbbaI1 comcast.nct> Subject; Confirm Communication to LTA: for Dec- 19th Meeting I just wanted to confirm the statement I would provide on your behalf. I know you had provided some different allocation numbers when we met on December but the LTAC will not be providing back a different proposal or Changing the allocations as part of the meeting on the 15th. I generally heard from you that in retrospect you would provide a larger allocation to Crave and Valley -fest —Cycle Celebration by adjusting down what was allocated to the Sports Commission and Visit Spokane. Does that sound correct? Could you please respond to this email verifying my understanding? Thanks, Chelsie Taylor, CPA 1 Finance DireoLor 10210 E. Sprague Avenue 1 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 720-5040 i ctaralbr s kanevallev�arg '1.#4746' This email and any attachments may be subject to disclosure pur1uant to Washington Stale's f ubllc Record Act, rhaptar 12.56 RCW- 1 HABudget\2018\Lodging Tax\2018 Requests and Awards Oct 2017 CEP( OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA City Council Awards of 20118 Lodging Tax I 11114;20117 11;21;2017 1 j City of Spokane Valley Parks and Recreation 2) Spokane Oktoberfest 3) Crave NW 4) Spokane Valley Heritage Museum 5) Spokane Co Fair and Expo - Interstate Fair 6) Spokane Sports Commission 7) HUB Sports Center 8) Valleyfest 9) Valleyfest Cycle Celebration 10) Visit Spokane 238,000 20,000 50,000 25,000 60,000 200,000 54,000 150,000 25,000 282,830 0 4,200 10000 2,000 30,000 4.400 13000 50,000 50.000 136,800 80.000 48,400 48400 3,000 18600 1,400 2,000 71,800 70:000 0 1,104,830 322,000 322,000 Proposed Transfer to Fund #104 250,000 250.000 Total Available in 2018 Budget 572,000 572,000 Council Amount LTAC Council Applicant Requested Recommend Proposal 1 j City of Spokane Valley Parks and Recreation 2) Spokane Oktoberfest 3) Crave NW 4) Spokane Valley Heritage Museum 5) Spokane Co Fair and Expo - Interstate Fair 6) Spokane Sports Commission 7) HUB Sports Center 8) Valleyfest 9) Valleyfest Cycle Celebration 10) Visit Spokane 238,000 20,000 50,000 25,000 60,000 200,000 54,000 150,000 25,000 282,830 0 4,200 10000 2,000 30,000 4.400 13000 50,000 50.000 136,800 80.000 48,400 48400 3,000 18600 1,400 2,000 71,800 70:000 0 1,104,830 322,000 322,000 Proposed Transfer to Fund #104 250,000 250.000 Total Available in 2018 Budget 572,000 572,000 Council CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 9, 2018 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ['consent ❑ old business ® new business ['public hearing ['information ❑admin. report ['pending legislation ['executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Confirmation of Mayoral Appointments of Councilmembers to Boards and Committees GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Various ordinances, resolutions, and state statutes. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Annually, the Mayor makes appointment recommendations to place Councilmembers on various regional board and committees. The following are the Mayor's recommendations for each Councilmember's committee assignments: 1. Spokane Clean Air Agency: Rod Higgins 2. Emergency 9-1-1: Brandi Peetz 3. Finance Committee: Rod Higgins, Pam Haley, and 4. Governance Manual Committee: Arne Woodard, Sam Wood, Linda Thompson 5. Greater Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce: Arne Woodard 6. Growth Management Steering Committee: Rod Higgins, Sam Wood 7. Greater Spokane, Inc. (GSI): Rod Higgins 8. Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee (HCDAC): Arne Woodard 9. Health District Board: Linda Thompson, Brandi Peetz 10. Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC): Sam Wood 11. Mayors' Association of NE Washington: Rod Higgins 12. Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC): Ben Wick 13. Spokane Transit Authority (STA): Pam Haley, Sam Wood; and Arne Woodard as alternate 14. TPA (Tourism Promotion, Hotel/Motel Association): Sam Wood 15. Visit Spokane: Pam Haley 16. Wastewater Policy Advisory Board: Arne Woodard, Rod Higgins OPTIONS: Move to confirm the Mayoral appointments of Councilmembers to the committees and boards as modified or listed above. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move to confirm the Mayoral appointments of Councilmembers to the committees and boards as listed above. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: COUNCIL CONTACT: Mayor Higgins ATTACHMENTS: List of committees 1. Clean Air Agency, Spokane Regional Some functions include coordinating activities with others in the community to carry out comprehensive policies for air pollution control; establish policies to achieve the board's mission. Delegates serve 4 years (or run with council term) 2. Emergency Communications Board 911 Purpose is to provide rapid public access for coordinated dispatching of services, personnel, equipment and facilities for police, fire, medical or other emergency services. Term generally runs in perpetuity as long as individual retains prerequisite for position, or until their appointing body designates a new representative. Meetings generally held at the 911 Center, 7:30 a.m. last Thursday of each month. 3. Finance Committee, Spokane Valley See Spokane Valley Municipal Code 2.50.120(a) and (b): "The responsibility and authority for developing, adopting, modifying and monitoring the travel policies and procedures for reimbursement of expenses incurred while on official business of the COSV, is delegated to the finance committee." The City Manager may also request meetings to discuss matters of financial interest with the Finance Committee. Finance Committee also has authority to approve certain change orders on short notice. 4. Governance Manual, Spokane Valley Works toward reviewing, refining, clarifying, or changing Council policies and procedures, to bring forward to full Council for further discussion/consideration. 5. Greater Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce Board The Chamber is a nonprofit 501(c)(6) organization; it serves businesses & organizations; they are committed to fostering relationships between members and the community to improve the economic climate and quality of life in Eastern Spokane County. Annual meeting held November; and other meetings throughout the year. Term usually Sept 1 to Aug 31 — but they are OK with us having an annual appointment. We are permitted 1 — ex -officio non-voting member. 6. Growth Management Steering Committee of Elected Officials Operates under the GMA Joint Planning Interlocal Agreement; responsibility is to specify standards for defining urban growth areas, minimum levels of service for UGA, distribution of future growth, negotiating UGA designations, and making recommendations regarding UGAs to the Board of County Commissioners. Meets the 3rd Wed of each month, 10 a.m. Spokane Transit Authority Board Room. One-year term subject to reappointment. 7. GSI (Greater Spokane, Inc.) According to bylaws, delegate must be Mayor 8. HCDAC (Housing & Community Dev. Advisory Committee) Authority: Spokane Co Housing & Comm Development Advisory Committee By -Laws. Purpose: provide citizen representatives of Spokane County the opportunity to participate in, comment on, and review all funding proposals for the HCDAC Division. Regular meetings 2nd Thurs of the month, 4-5 p.m. Community Service Bldg. Term Period: 3 years. Appointment Process: Mayor writes to BoCC requesting ok of appointment. 9. Health District Board Serves at discretion of appointing Mayor but not to exceed 3 years. Serves as governing body of the Health District; works to unite the municipalities & the county in a cooperative effort to supervise all matters pertaining to the preservation of the life and health of the citizens within its jurisdiction. Typically meets last Thursday of the month at 12:30. Two elected officials from Spokane Valley. 10. Lodging Tax Advisory Committee, Spokane Valley Committee consists of 5 members: Two members who represent businesses required to collect tax and; two members involved in funded activities; and one councilmember to act as chair. 11. Mayors Association of NE Washington —representative is Mayor 12. SRTC (Spokane Regional Transportation Council) Purpose: facilitates such appropriate coordination and cooperation of transportation planning and provides for continuing area -wide transportation planning program in association with powers & functions as noted in interlocal. Meets monthly, 2nd Thursday at 1 pm, downtown Spokane Per interlocal agreement, term is 3 years or the tenure of office of the representative in their jurisdiction, whichever is the lesser time, subject to reappointment. We are permitted one voting position: appointed by each governing body, who shall be an elected official. 13. STA (Spokane Transit Authority) 1 year subject to reappointment. Board meets 3rd Thursday of the month. 2 delegates plus one alternate for Spokane Valley. Board provides policy and legislative direction for the Corporation and its administrators. 14. TPA (Tourism Promotion Area) — Hotel/Motel We have one representative. 15. Visit Spokane One year term, subject to reappointment. Purpose is to market the Spokane region as a preferred destination for all visitors. 16. Wastewater Policy Advisory Board Per interlocal: 2 Spokane Valley Elected Representatives. 4 year term or until any such elected official ceases to be an elected official. This Board generally only meets once or twice a year. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 9, 2018 Department Director Approval: ❑ Check all that apply: ❑ consent n old business ®new business n public hearing ❑ information n admin. report n pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Planning Commission Mayoral Appointments GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Spokane Valley Municipal Code 18.10. BACKGROUND: Two Planning Commissioner terms expired December 31, 2016: Michael Phillips, and Heather Graham. Heather Graham decided not to apply for re -appointment consideration. According to SVMC 18.10, members of the Planning Commission shall be nominated by the Mayor and confirmed by a majority vote of at least four members of the City Council. Planning Commissioners shall be selected without respect to political affiliations, and shall serve without compensation. A vacancy announcement was posted on the City's webpage, and was published in the Spokesman Review, in the Valley News Herald, and in the Exchange. The deadline to submit an application was 4:00 p.m. Monday, December 18. Six applications were received within the deadline and were previously distributed to each Councilmember. Mayor Higgins will announce his nominations for these appointments at tonight's meeting. OPTIONS: Confirm or not confirm, the Mayor's recommendations for appointment to the Planning Commission. If the Mayor's recommendations are not confirmed by Council, the Mayor may either make another recommendation, or the matter can be postponed. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: "I move to confirm the Mayor's nominations for appointments to the Planning Commission, of and each for a three-year term beginning January 1, 2018 and ending December 31, 2020. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: n/a STAFF/COUNCIL CONTACT: Mayor Higgins ATTACHMENTS: Applications for openings Spokane Application Form for Com m itteeslBoardslComm issions 12'15-/7P02:29 RCVD Return Completed forrn to City Clerk at City Hall, 10210 E. Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, WA 99206 509-720-51102 phone; 509-720-5050 fax POSITION APPLYING FOR: I"; /un r F,74 40._.; 5 5 Applicant's name (please print): F,, 4J Applicant's Resfdertce Address: 4 Street5;:pk-44 tie I‘JA 4 City / Zip Code Applicant's Mailing Address(if rilff rHnk arum bEri [:Face addr sj: S.treet Applicant's Email` _.._._ _ .. ` F ee, c "iTt- C Home Phone; 0 b7 `e.Work Phone: 5, City Zip Code Cell Phone: 54f--'-(e- Length of time continuously lived within Spokane Valley City Limits; f� .*eater-' `'I NOTE; You must be a resident of the City of Spokane Valley to participate on most boards, committees and commissions. Gender: Femalel'Ef. Male [ 'L1.S. Citizen? ye., Wa. State Roistered voter? /v) EMPLOYMENT HISTORY: Present or last employer: � ' i jLcie- II�..� 2/1. Position e]d r. , c,�1 �. S ii --- Dates of Employment: '°I ee � •a Address: /903 J ' yr' r Phone: ' Previous Employer: Position tfeld; Dates of Employment: 02"1 — AL). Address: adiek. ittAk Phone; co..2_.. k EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: High Se ,aol: 1'^ " el.', A 514" City/State Address"n,, car /i CG -4 Diploma: Yes f No ,r1 rpt rnn.+ College/University: 2 (( H Degree Earned: 51714\ City/State Address: #14 mord- ont College/University: 1 9:4-74 _ is--ers4`47 City/Stateddress: !^',•`� Degree Earned: rr1.,4e-ur City c'fSpokane Valley Application fur CotnmitteesflloardslConimissions [912017] Pagc of 2 COMMUNITY RELATED AC1'IVIT`IES, PAST & PRESENT: (attach additional sJ)c i;ts i F necrssary} ,MN u - V hAp4 A55 pc-. ! n.w L -a a' 'f VOLUNTEER EXP RIENGES, PAST SE PRESENT: oar Cr1 r /w arta i ele- , �� , l_- C. --`r Ieb 3* �► 'e A,,��( # f��'�` /"C.rt� Q,._,r: x`.-�r� ,,r jti P 1-5 114,510 d ( e ft re a 2 4 • cc 4- •. },ti.. rr. , [ SPECIAL SKJLLS,/TNTIERFSTS: %7 l l A4)./c. rti-t r 7n^ f .- - Sid r` -- �ac. ! t7 n �`.� fi/�tll + ` c+ Ys4 r`�e +c 4 d e. p PAST OR PRESENT MEMBER OF THE FOLLOWING PROFESSIONAL, CP IC ORGANIZATIONS OR GOVERNMENT BOARDS, COMMITTEES, OR COMMISSIONS: rL GLV fS Committee Nano Arc/,r+ ttn,e Committee Name /144 Committee Name City/State (4..• I /4-5 City/State City/State What do you feel you can contribute to the community that may not be evident from information already furnished? ! (ogrqe cods =f� Why do you feel you are qualified to act as a member of the Board, Committee or Commission for which you are applying? ✓ /11,54-e.- L_ ap e { c + 6-I : a r..,a . e J/vc>rr.{ rtia. - � 5c S Would your appointment to this pe`tion create a conflict of interest or an appearance of a conflict of interest? / Signature Today's Date City of Spokane 4'alley Application fur Committeesilloard0C:oinmissions [9/2017) Page 2 of 2 SOL'olane Valley a5In Form for Committees/Boards/Commissions RECEIVED CL8 1011 City of EC pOT a:e VaUey City perk Return Complete for1rto ity Clerk at City Hall, 10210 E. Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, WA 9920G 509-720-51102 phone; 500-720-5080 fax POSITION APPLYING FOR' ,_v,r\ r Q. .C3r rtic-:-7.--.1„„cLIA Applicant's name (ploaso prink); 1 l.\l Applicant's Residence Address: C JL L.4 C�\ -*,+ C 1 \ ._ Street City ( Zip Code Applicant's Mailing Address OF different from Residence address): Zip Code Street City Applicant's Email: Home Phone; Warm Phone: Cell Phone -,\' k'`11.� Length of time continuously lived within Spokane Wiley City Limits: NOTE; You must be A resident of the City of Spokane Valley to participate on most boards, committees and commissions_ Gender Female Male L.I.S. Citizen 4 _.` s d. State -Registered voter? EMPLOYMENT HISTORY: Present or last employer: Position Held: s\ Dates LAF.mploytnent: 2.0oo — - , 11r) Address. ,.lir ca.. ) L _ r ' Phone: e Previous Employer: Position Held: \, . _ _ Dates of Employment: - Address: —......_ .� e`er .cz r.F .� VAS.' Phone: EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: High. School; �,,wtt Diploma: Yt.„ No City/State Address-.tik_,,(,x. Col lege University: -,.C:,tti, Degree Earned: . s City/State Address: College/University: Degree R n ned: City/State Address: City of -Spokane Valley Application for Comma vssiunis F9/2017I Page 1 aft COMMUNITY RELATED ACTIVITIES, PAST & PRESENT: (attach additional sheets if Iaccessary) C 01A VOLUNTEER EXPERIENCES, PAST & Pte: 116 ii. SPECIAL SKILLS/INTERESTS: r, , 1%, f( i,v,,,r \w. c � 1c;� \C C t`c k 0 _ 3i5, PAST OR PRESENT MEMBER OF THE FOLLOWING PROFESSIONAL, CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS OR GOVERNMENT BOARDS, COMMITTEES, OR COMMISSIONS: .R)lA Committee Name Co Torniltee Name Committee Name City/State City/State f ity/Sl a6.e What clo you feel you can contribute to the community that may not be evident From information already furnished? n ) c-+ tax e r Why do you feel you are qualified to act as a member of the Board, Committee or Commission for which you are applying? Would your appy to this posidiou create a conflict of interest or an appearance of a conflict of interest? Signa Today's Date City of Spokane Valley Application for Committees.Th:,ards.+Conumissions 9/20171 Page 2 of 2 *akane Valley Application Form for Committees/Boards/Commissions Return Completed form to City Clod( at City Hull, 10210 E. Sprague At+r.rit.ie Spokane Valley, WA '-1920r 509-720-5102 phone; 509-720-.5090 fax POSITLONAPPLYING' 1 tv.,nr\i,(}C3 C vyt> s( n ,'1irplis`,aas flame tpl ,,c; piirit}. ChrtS-i-op er 10, 1son AppIit•,;:lrlr; iRe iCla 114r? f'4 dre$5. Street City Applicant's Mailing Address .r df�:Ui.t ii itL}it Li v� J�rtas : .. .,`10.7 Zip Code Stre City Zip Code Applicant's Email, C �}r;, 4u n rw ? 1C iDf)ycAcV,,St)r1 oti . core) Home PhoneWork Phone: CeII Phone: Length of time continuously lived within Spokane Valley City Limits: _� _ - NOTE: You must be a resident o` the City of Spokane Valley to participate on most board:=, committees and commissions. Gender: Female [1=1 Male [M] U.S. Citizen? \'4''a State Regisccred voter? 'ICS EMPLOYMENT HISTORY: Pr'escant or last tmploycr., `;' : KC t i , Position Held: • `Eci,Jr Dates of Employment: } - (E'S t t-1' t'horac: (5 ) Previous Kmployer: 41.) ft, Clef in,,-'" • ' ::I'Jc \ Y Or n'tizok "lD r o1ChcAn 1e (i F 1 pc) Posuion Hr..ld: .aro to f -c,0 Cod, ex Dates of Employment: 04 ] 20[ - 1 V 2 / C11'I Address' •:J :� IL'i_l4 I 4i oS po K` 4 n Phone: L', -)C 1 - 3 / CIL; EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: High School: f\ \(e -Y. 5"i 4 4 i 1 3c hoo Diploma: Yes 1.1 No City/State Address 1-L-120 L 3 2. nai FSU o Cr ne ' c i 1 V/ F $ L f College/University: 1;*",,:, "uf n* fir C -r. Degree Earned: City/State Address: 5',(,o Hi t 'r , 13,e1; r t ttf�, \+ '51.'6225 College/University: U1 f11,) (k LJi Degree Earned: CiLyiState Address: 2 S+a i7' 'rpt' 'r [ � Ni City of Spokane Valley Application for Cominitfees&l3oards/Commi sioris 191201'71 Page 1 oft COMMUNITY RELATED ACTIVITIES, PAST & PRESYNTt (attach additional sheets if necessary) FO r oebovi-e, L0(1k)e) cif E -1.,)Jto 0-1-E, 5cA e rice, Fts-h void n vc t 5 Vo e Fv3) e.V.) r) cirtc,111 n 2r"\/3 V cA 1 el Fe 5+ VOLUNTEFR MCPERIENCES, PAST & PRESENT: De\Do-i-E SPECIAL SKILLS/INTERESTS: Dair&N Ook\ 11.5't')) C.0 nn M U6+ ic cy e, e, n4eGiLd-6 ni re Or, iflThc1-1- (41 d e r 1 c‘ (A ((Alec iU L irC CCr i) 1:11E2:220r LA±LQ IJflPt; C\. rAc ck.rceCA -)s" PAST OR PRESENT fvLEMBER OF THE FOLLOWING PROFESSIONAL, CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS OR GOVERNMENT BOARDS, Gwyn/n][7ms, OR COlyIEWSSIONS: OUrcktpkc) )-IcIrk"t.C5 Committee Name BC -c\ o UCrihe, „c,:)±knrie,5 Committee Name Co nun. te c Name City/State D_L-)nt 1 r-1 NI/ City/State CirtAducA4e, SC,10,00,1 CC.) d 3v) okrn ) City/State What do you feel you can contribute to the community that may not be evident from information already furnished? Ti nThe c4--0 k vo r4- er Ck 5,ne. \IY Wliy do you reel yu .lie qugific Li to it as a luellib el jfti.ic roaid, Comeco Counidssiaa fth:wlikh you ai aPPIYing? ha • mot CA. rti LA/9011-'1' 41) -orAi --D p c 5 LP -1-s \\ ILD'as e 5,5e. 5, Would your appointment to this position create a conflict of interest or an appearance of a conffict of intere9t7 N f iccerv Signature 1 2 / [ Today's Date City of Spokanc V1iy Application for Committees/BonixisiCormissions [9/2017] Paw 24.312 _Valley Application Form for Committees/Boards/Commissions DEC z 4 2G17 City of Spokane Valley City Clerk Return Completed form to City Clerk at City Hall, 10210 E. Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, WA 99206 509-720-5102 phone: 509-720-5080 fax POSITION APPLYING FOR: 1 -)Ii an (''C'pm iN i.) P( Applicant's name (please prink)' \it' Applicant's Residence Address: 1 \ x CCA G\ ‘- Nlokctoe \k\\Q.� c1 City Zip Code Street Applicant's Mailing Address (if different From RosIdence address); Street Applicant's Email: City Zip Code Home Phone: 5 - `1- At'cf Work Phone -.5 -. - �`t Cell Phone: 11 1 - 79 Length of time continuously lived within Spokane Valley City Limits: c 4 NOTE: You must be a resident of the City of Spokane Valley to participate on m st boards, committees and commissions. Gender: Female M Male M] U.S. Citizen? Wa. State Registered voter? _C EMPLOYMENT HISTORY: Present or last e-mployer: OC.CfiThii QQ(`S Posh ion. Held: ?{;; ,: :�r f Dates of Employment: .2O i 1p - Cu crPn Address! l C- ( k I L O0 oy_c r) 16 t Plronc; I'rrevia Ernplo}qtr: —y(.`k k o:.. Enc3 6 PQx n 7J 0 ()l; r..(. ; n141.- L I'n ytiorL field: 'i ,r Kx.11-0 ;,,;;) (IO :..;) ic?Ck -C.( Dates of Employment: f_ ',f - 3 011, - OCi- 00 l E DUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Is .1 5n1,; c�1 \AI 0 CLLy Statc` i4,tiic:SS CD11cge:'l vgiver`iiLy- V 17!'1��i it' V7 14.15' h9! -{'.h' C1i ; S rite Address; ecoVan ti Lk) Diploma: Yes M No Degree Earned: College/Uniiversity:.I*1� 1� � Degree Earned; 1-1 d f"C` c Ltr '(YiG�l�4s� city/Stste Address; S �CICi 9 1 oil. c V n Crl -` e Qomr-n l Col\e_e City of Spokane Valley Application for C;omrnillees/Boards/Commissions [9/20171 Page 1 oft COMMUNITY RELATED ACTIVITIES, PAST & PRESENT: (attach additional sheets if necessary) Tc - c rsy ,--tC\G C . C - .n F. +� • Soy rnpzet P-kir)tx r�^c k aT, try .1-3fi;t 1 .0 ; e . • _Le VOLUNTEER E}PERII?NCES PAST & PRESENTS \SGsarr ra Me), r. 1\Clksc c '000 iiil C rt 10U-S)q rrnee r n mt d , LC )k 01, CA O --}“+A 1 on 16rn r\¢+LES.�. _ ,'r �cc pr�i r� �a c Clo t SPELL siuu RESTTS: : ,' = 6 [k� ( "k.+rY1Ct'l1 PON e__J ci.:-)r)inn } (,''r''r'li cctii k r`t' 1x"fay,\ r.rrrt51 Qrtfl'ki4FC' G }tier - `7`k '+ ::-e Ca\ nj CiC` t1.s, n'r J Onlr W-1 r (-)t\\ *Cr Q'ti e.s u` 1lcxrk 'ti \CA' r I x .1or le n PAST OR PRESENT MEMBER OF THE FOLLOWING PROFESSIONAL, CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS OR GOVERN -MEN -I-. BOARDS, COMMITTEES, OR COMMISSIONS: . v L S" p'-) r- l"- \F -ti ( `t-1 Committee Name City/State 71-001(1:\ 0,5A e_7c c_2,1106cn c, Committee Naive City/State St .. l .sg_ 'Peri`), II, 0) est--ilsel --tk!- \1 c M-:-rt-,.n .. r rlrti-, 2 Slcar L.. (1 Committee Name - 5 `c STA -5: C rrt r fikE - City/State What do you feel you can contribute to the community that may not be evident from information already furnished? 11 Ick., lNvrtoll. 5 1.+.xorltc_c 1 Y)00 V26. 1 ra\. Qtr T`i tI1 C.V\1\ ck r9O and Yrc ec'n r.1/40.7+70. --f_ s,-, ,-14-...1,_ _ (Cr v"t tr lky o � r- x-Aw V'ck\\ct . r, -\ ,� gC 1 is x eS S-tafr-i ') O_4 , CC L , . 1 k,C1 11 t_ cikictArc e uk- C I . . Why do you feel you are qualified to act as a member of the Board, Committee or Com for with you are aPPIYine Vides &Yr., cAri e l C\ an,d (AM e s,c r c t , c . j1(. 1 n,c ICc3 r rj Is YID i 4 1 ..-A)"(11011- 7 ti So+;,q' ', fl1Vv''> -P (I deep ordL7— (, nd c- b0&'It ess )(i. la ' e. ' ho. ; a`-) c 4 Ac Jr.,i 1 e t c) C c19:17t t cm t; r_ 1!,.t'C 14.( - Would your appointment to this position create a conflict of interest or an appearance of a conflict of interest? Signature Todas Date City of Spokane Valley Application for Comm ittees/Boards/C'ominissions [9/22417] Page 2 oft Spokane .001.l ley; Application Form for Committees/BoardsiCommissions Return Completed form to City Clerk at City Hall, 11707 E. Sprague Ave. Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 509-720-5102 phone; 509-688-0194 fax POSITION APPLYING FOR Planning Commission Applicant's name (please print): Michel C Phillips Applicant's Residence Address 8925 E Cataldo Avenue Spokane Valley 99212 Street City Zip Code Applicant's Mailing Address (if different from Residence address); Street Applicants Email: rnikeo simpsonengineers,com Home Phone: 594-928-1028 Work Phone:509-926-1322 Cell Phone: 509-688-3751 City Zip Code Length of time continuously lived within Spokane Valley City Limits: 40 Years NOTE: You must be a resident of the City of Spokane Valley to participate on most boards, committees and commissions. Gender: Female 1 Made 1.:.5. C:it.i'Len's VES Wa, State Registered voter? YES EMPLOYMENT HISTORY: Prewenior last employer: Clarence E Simpson Engineers, Tnc. Position ITeld: Land Surveyor Dates of Employment: 1970 to Date Address: N 909 A rgonne Road, Spokane Valley, WA 99212 Phone: 509-926-1322 1'rcviottis Employer: Foss Launch and Tug Position Held: Deck ITand / Oiler Dates of Employment: 1969 till February 1970 Address: Seattle WA Phone: EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND; High School: Central Valley High School Diploma: Yes City/State Address Spokane Valley, WA College/1.1n iversity: EWU Degree Earned; _BA- Accounting City/State Acidreiis: Cheney, WA College/lin iv F. r 1ty: City/State Address: No Degree Earned: COMMUNITY RETATED AC:"TIVITIES, PAST & PRESENT; Volunteered at FIoopl'est for several years. Volunteered for Habitat for Ilurnanity. Taught Spokane County Emp]oyees the Principles of Legal Descriptions. Served of Spokane Valley. Planning Commission. Spokane Valley, WA VOLUNTEER EXPERIENCES, PAST & PRESENT: Scout Master — Boy Scouts of America, Spokane County Storm Water Committee, H oopfest, Spokane Valley P1iann i ng Commission SPECIAL S CLLS/JNTERESTS: Licensed Pro1essicanal Land Surveyor PAST OR PRFST?;STT MEMBER OF THE FOLLOWING PROFESSIONAL, CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS OR GOVERNMENT BOARDS, COMMITTEES, OR COMMISSIONS: Past President of Inland Empire Chapter of the T,and Surveyor Association of Washington Spokane, WA Secretary for Hutchinson Irrigation District #16 for 35 years Spokane Valley, WA Secretary for Carnhope Irrigation District #7 for 32 years Spokane Valley, WA Spokane Valley Planning Commission since 2013 Spokane Valley, WA What do you feel you can contribute to the community that may not be evident from information already furnished? With my experience presenting various Projects before the City of. Spokane & Spokane County Planning Commission in. the Past and currently serving on the Spokane Valley Planning Commission I feel I can bring a vast knowledge to the Corry m ission. Why do you feel you are qualified to act as a member of the Board. Committee or Commission for which you are applying? I have worked for 48 years with Land Related Issues_ Would your appointment to this position create a conflict of interest or an appearance of a conflict of interest? Possibly, IV our iirrn waq working on an item that was corning before the commission ] could excuse myself from that item. Signature Today's Date *Wane . . Valley= Application Form for Committees/Boards/Commissions F1ECEIVED 7PCK.-4rLLk. VALLEY COM r;1lJ,'. r DEVELOPMENT Return Completed form to City Clerk at City HIL, 10210 E, Sprague A'. onue Spokane Valley, WA 9920 509-720-5102 phone; 50-720-5080 fax POSITION APPLYING FOR: V 'C}I ., e.., t Applicant's name (please print): Applicant's Residence Address: 17 : 1J74'r �oi Street City p C 6 Applicant's Mailinro Address (if diffErentham Rosid❑neo- address): y�treet City Zip Code Applicant's Email: 1' i_ _ ' +`r�' cisry -L.� teal Horne Phone: 5 -St - - ' 7/ Work Phone: Coil Phone: Length of tine continuously lived within Spokane Valley C]ty Llmits: NOTE: You must be a resident of the City of Spokane Valley to participate on most boards, committees and commissions. Gender; Female= mak csiI.LS, Citizen? \'4'a. State Regiscererl votee tiv EMPLOYMENT 1-IISTDRY: Preseiit or last employer: F LC J1ositii3)7 1E• 1d; Y Et?. r i C Address: Phone; ' '3 --. rt r " Dates o1 Employment: 44 7-4iN Previous Employer; 611,14fOril+j UILV Position Held:* 1 , e_hiQ tict2tue Adclre.98; ' , c ie:irynne Phone: w— ., 4 1T)1EDIJCATIONAL AACKGRDt]N : Dates of Employment: Acle.,?-. ,, 4 Ori 7V0.--) High School: 31,11,1 11, _ (i4,LILT rQi(3541, City/State Address riekrAy',t +i #' College,1inivez ity: City/State Address:' a fI1r rY . College/University: _Libor Liiiilvc4.5t.kj ictPctic5 Unkte..f M City/State Address: Diploma: No DTA Degree Earned:. ' ' i r; " t5 Degree Earnee "C: t) ' l y (6-6;51 - eAU t L'r16144u Lectcltr H (1)05-1 CeiratitrAte c m'er c>c J u1 P thr Cuk 'p foe: City of Spokane V a11oy Application for CommittedsiBci rds{Cnrrani.sstc ns 19x'2017 CONN 'Y RELATED ACf V1TIES, PAST & PRESENT: (Hunch addition& iI ems if necessary) it if 17, Ckt5I, ftr 1 [37x,5 MILX:Wer Ian> 7,1 k . et9r, VOLUNTEERpiPERIENOS, PAST & PRESENT: d n t. .'� :' 4 e t click — ret i+ri C'eiv 'rj ; 41 + ' t11 t ' '. �� , Y .. p Icka i.4e, c}i Cco i'.`t.0 - Y -V X — 'L "t . i {A 5J1 . s 44%1p•../,,I. SPECiAI, Millie ,,c..441 `c..-I:HIr. , -ti 64.. rev" ',-^ 1;11d PAST PRESENT MEMBEROFATHE FOLLOWING PROFESSIONAL, civic ORGANIZATIONS OR GOVERNMENT BOARDS, COMMITTEES, IRES! OR COMMISSIONS: Committee Nance Committee Name Cornrniaee Nairc rite City/State City/State City/State What do yon feel you can contribute to the community that may not be evident from information slzeady furnished? 4 � t,uz fry,.- e r ') e. • +-vP � c c L r'Ireq'-# r Why do you f 1 you are qu is ied to act as a uteintet of the Board, Co::ii:,ittee or Comm r kiica. for which you aye applying? ,x voLd Aricidoieczbi ver, V` 'Lt i5 i. C-. et. Would your?ppointmeut to this position create a conflict of interest or an appearance of a conflict of interest? t a kj City of Spokinc Valley Application for Commit#e oards}Conirnissions [9120171 Today's Date Page 2of2 4C1-- SUPERIOR COIJII' of WASHINGTON for SPOKANE COUNTY In the Matter of NOTICE Planning Commission Openings City of Spokane Valley STATE ofWASHINGTON County rrfSpokane AFFIDAVIT of PUBLICATION NO, LEGAL NOTICE MICHAEL HUFFMAN being first duly sworn on oalh deposes and says that he is the EDITOR of the Spokane Valley New: Herald, a ;weekly newspaper. That said newspuper is a legal newspaper and it is now acrd Inas been for niorc than six months prior to the da.:. o:' publication hereinafter referred to, published in the f ,riz}lish language continually us n weekly 11.81'sp aper in Spokane CLiunly, Wilshirvon, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication ot'cad newspaper,. which said newspaper had bean approved as a legal newspaper by order nftlic Superior Court of the Slab in and for Spokane County- That the following is a !roe copy of a Legid Notice as it was published in regular issue commencing on the 1711i day of November, 2017, and ending on the 15th day or December, 2017, all dines inclusive, and lhal newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers dursag all of said ]weried: crnr0FSP0NLANE VALLEY MANNING COMMISSION OPENINGS the Cllr uI Spokane eake trete fma ba:5 1u salve. or My uI Spokane Valleys. Alxunlrp Cornrninniu,i. Terme are 10r Lhrrc ybar6. two inruinbsid6' terms areeY;1iri!ig December $1,2017. 01 thea Iwo a•kiarls, one •a':11 Exp noe'ung reep- p Inir iir:d. The cornmi nnieii v4udlea end makes ieeonyiyerkle11;n5 kn ihu City Cculcil raP 1011:.e plaimeC growth an diir:le3 by the cit,' Cnuuu#- ❑Ie91111Ca1i n irt�u a .having an Inleiest In plenrng, Iard use., Li F S IOr- IalIon, cap11a1 InlreeLnJvlunr, and bullding; and, la naps deelgn as rriderie d aW training, e i ileme, or.nlerest In Me Cit 01 Spokaiab valley. C:ommsemon members are iominaled by Lhe Skeymr and oomennad by a mainrily yule 01 CItj Canirw!kItlembera ThappainkineiflBELIOtenlatimelyseieduled Lo be nad..akllib,7ammy*.2L 1e Council reeehng. Meivbere are aerated k1M111 uk respect to pau11ca1 aflllielinns and aerMe without rnmpensalloa: Numbers muai reside. w1Lh1n the elly ttml!■ of Spokane Valley, The cxurn.LsaRonfignnrally meela al 6:00 p.m. oi,!I1e 2nd end 41h Tburankays:, Apps lixrn may tie ote.alnrxl Iron sLhb C1ty'a w eb81le al Lilp:rW,�w,eppkaucxa+lay.or{6' ✓ alor ee[ nr Ixp wi di :111117 Chun Oaiiibuldge, Cry dells, fr;: 172.7-51 M. A - iIc aliane mu& be recei4nd by I7ie Spol;enr. VaII89 (Ity Clerk r6 !aim lIia;i 4:00 P,r^-, Monday, December 19, 2017. Tho torn lur Mese aoeltons wII begIn upon apioi,lkulenL al Ilse JanLnry 9. 201B maeiirg, Chri the Rainb.hige, MMC Spokane VaIk!y oily Clerk PUeLt6N: November 17, 24, Dec 1, 6 and 15, 2017 f 11BSCf acrd SWORN to before me 111;s Iitlt'dsly of December, 2017 'ac:: of Washington County of Spokane certify that I now or have satisfactory t videtioe that Michael 11ut'lirran is clic person who appeared before me, and said person. acknowledged that he signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the illstrumen Jolene Rae "env Title: Notary Public My appointment expires: 05-116-2019 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 9, 2018 Department Director Approval: ❑ Check all that apply: ['consent ❑ old business ® new business ['public hearing ❑ information ['admin. report ['pending legislation ['executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Mayoral Appointment: Lodging Tax Advisory Committee GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 67.28.1816; Spokane Valley Municipal Code 3.20.040 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: n/a BACKGROUND: Per state statute, the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee shall consist of five members: two representatives of businesses required to collect the tax, two members involved in activities authorized to be funded by the tax, and one City Councilmember. A vacancy exists for a member involved in activities authorized to be funded by the tax, and for an entity which collects the tax. Ads announcing the vacancy ran in the Valley News Herald, the Spokesman Review, and the Exchange, and notice of the openings was also placed on the City's website. The deadline to receive applications was 4:00 p.m. December 27, 2017. As of 12-31-2017, the committee consists of Councilmember Wood as Chair and: Entities which collect the tax Lee Cameron, Mirabeau Park Hotel (current term expires 12-31-2018) Colleen Heinselmann, Hampton Inn Suites (current term expired 12-31-2017) Entities Involved in Activities funded by the tax Scott Peterson, Spokane County Fair Board (current term expires 12-31-2018) William Ames, the HUB (current term expired 12-31-2017) OPTIONS: Confirm or not, the Mayor's recommendation for appointment. If the Mayor's recommendation is not confirmed by Council, Mayor Higgins may either make another recommendation or the matter can be postponed. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to confirm the Mayoral appointments to the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee, of Colleen Heinselman from the Hampton Inn, representing a member authorized to collect the tax; and Gregory Repitti with the HUB, representing a member involved in activities authorized to be funded by the tax, with each appointment's term beginning immediately upon appointment, and expiring December 31, 2019. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: n/a STAFF/COUNCIL CONTACT: Mayor Higgins ATTACHMENTS Applications for openings. ll 4 .000Valley q Iication Form for Committees/Boards/Commissions RECEPVED DEC 19 20J7 City of Spokane efrosT �• •eeior to City Clerk at tr ,II. 10210 E. Sprague Avenue Spo ane Valley, WA 99206 509-720-5102 phone; 509-720-5080 fax POSITION APPLYING FOR:[, Applicant's name (please print): LC` ve4/1 (74.)/e''1l Sofpi/Icy Applrcant's Residence Address: / c' c}f g -u, _i___1/./_ qe/ Street City 1 Zip Code Applicant's Mailing Address Of (JIifnrent from ResldenrA address); QS61-111_0 1_0 eet Applicant's EmCCail: f/e&v �fJl ill-LeiM ? St Ce fl . ce City Zip Code Home Phone: J - — Work Phone: J q -q '` ?C r) Cell Phone: gcic,,_ f77 Length of time continuously lived within Spokane Valley City Limits: iavitA s IA as 1- i att./ NOTE_ You must be a resident of the City of Spokane Valley to participate on most boards, commiite s and commissions. Gender: Female Male =I U.S. Citizen?,► C Wa. State Registered voter?S EMPLOYMENT HISTORY: Present or last employer:{� Position Held: 4�J ^IQj,jiJ 04 Phone: cCQ ,qQ2-teief 061 Dates of Employment: yl__l c J saF-► " Address:LV Previous Employer: -moi'',. Position Held: Alia fx /Po..otiniXates of Employment: aati.- - Address: Phone: EDUCA'ITO)* High School: CKGROUND,44 !,c _J City/State Address Diploma: Yes Nor College/University: Degree Earned: C41I� City/State Address. Col l ege/University: City/State Address: Degree Earned: City of Spokane Valley Application for CornrnittccsfBoards/Commix ioo (9/20171 faze 1 of 2 COMMENT -EY RELATED ACTIVITTFS, PAST & PRESENT; (arta at additional sheets if necessary) VOL , ER E PERIENCES, PAST & PRESENT; NLtiaTipto, Vtit.,-444 ,ALLULP_AA SPECI. SKILLS/INTERESTS; PAST OR PRESENT MEMBER OF THE FOLLOWING PROFESSIONAL, CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS OR GOVERNMENT BOAR DS, COMMITTEES, OR COMMISSIONS. Committee Name Committee Namel Committee Name Str,,t4 City/State . - -1 City /State City/StaLc t da you feel you can contribute to the community that may not be evident from information already furnished? Why do you feel you are gnAlified to act as a member of the Board, Committee or Comrni Won for which you are ition create a conflict of interest or an appearance of a conflict of inter- t city of Spokane Valley Application for Conlinittces/B oards/C.oEntnissiotas [9/20 [ 7] Today's Date Page 2 of 2 Siitikane Valle Application Form for Cormittees!BoardslCommissions 'DEC 2 2.2017 City of Spokane Valley City Clerk Return Completed form to City Clerk at City hall, 10210 E. Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, WA 992DB 509-720-5102 p1one, 509-720-5080 fax POSITION APPLYING FOR: Applicant's name (please print): Applicant's Residence Address: iff.O. 3ii /77 CT Street City Zip Code Applicant's Mailing Address OF different from Residence H:i(li ss)' City Street Applicant's Email: � `010CArit • car Home Phone') tct.$+ Work Phone:&09') L/73-5405 Cell Phone:1-0jJ 71.1 //3 Length of time continuously lived within Spokane Valley City Limits: Z NOTE: You must be a resident of the City of Spokane Valley to participate on most boards, committees and cammissioas. Zip Code Gender: Female talc U,S. Citizen? '1/4-A.C.11 Wa. State Regi u red voter? EMPLOYMENT HISTORY: Present. or last err? toyer: lir \ C../ t ,' 4---\ Position Held: ifiDates of Employment: 6-J / `i Address: 1 Z CC ,L. E. , l''',,'-'1 : &5 c.... Sps l ,!-s ,c {gritty 1_4 . e. Phone:, rJ- Previous ]Employer:� Position Held: 4 c . .- It nc\ CIFC•c_ Dates of' Employment: - 1 6-3/ Address: f._), 1'' v'.z Crac phone: (509 3- 5(4206 EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: High Scliool:'r1,,,1s r*_r� 1\,c Sono I7iplorna: Yes J` No D City/State Address COPg4 C41.e-ry.f r' fdic Coilege[L.rniversity: )(/),L* Uri; VA _._ Degree Earned: E.S /a re, City/State Address; ,' e_) /44 ✓fir' T ltegc{University: C7SrIt Linn! -.s• City/State Address: Degree Earned: �i 4- �/T dr,i; r City of Spokane Valley Application for Committees/Boards/Co missions 0/2017] Piga 1 oft COM UNI Y RELATED ACTIITITIES, PAST & PRESENT (attach additional sheets if necessary).. Oat `c!`1. S viz VOLUNTEER EXPERIENCES, PAST & PRESENT SPECIAL SKILIS/I TE{ RESTS: F pflff4-1 PAST OR PRESENT MEMBER OF THE FOLLOWING PROFESSIONAL, CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS OR GOVERN -KENT BOARDS, COMMITIIES, OR. COMMISSIONS: Gr\eprr,\ Conunitree Naive a ),L.\ ,- Crefliel 41e L,-,1/ ,i c-,- City/State P4U13 5 fes. � 2 .� , � t4E L-44. City/ tate Committee Name Cz, $.? Committee Name City/State What do you feel you can contribute to the community that may not be evident from information already furnished? " int '' f 1 7 ocJ 6,4-4-7,/, `. Why do you fed you are cr isli fled to act as a member of the Board, Committee or Commission for which you are applying? (rcJtklae' r seri Itep.es rb} 1 . " 16P6+- (//y)(el Would your appointment to position create a conflict of interest or an appearance of a conflict of interest? 72A1; 7 Sigrkt re Today's Date City of Spokane Valley Applicat[oui for Co rain itteealioards/Colnlnissions [9!2017] Page 2 oft V REGOR G. H P TTL HI, FA CH 2311 South Illagnolia Court Spokane, HA 99203 509.315.8326 — Home 509.991.1132 — Cell gregrepetti@yahoo.00111 SENIOR HEALTHCARE LEADER Results driven, high energy executive with a successful track record in healthcare management. Leads organizations to strong financial performance by decisively leading growth and change. Excellent people skills at all levels of the organization and the community at large, PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: President MultiCare Valley Hospital Spokane, Washington Chief Executive Officer (2014 -Present) CEO responsible for leading a 123 bed not-lbr-profit Hospital (hospital is owned by Multicarc Health System). The organization has 5,750 adtnissions, 10,500 surgical procedures annually, 560 FTEs, net revenues of $125 million and an EBITDA of approximately $24 million. • improved financial performance to by 50% in one year from an EBIDTA of S15 million in 2013 to $22,5 million in 2014 and 2015, $24 million in 2016, and $23 million in 2017, EB1TDA margin of 19.5% or greater in each year. • Improved labor productivity by 7% to 93 roan hours per adjusted patient day. • Recruited, in conjunction with Rockwood Clinic, new sports medicine orthopedic specialist and started regional sports medicine program which is currently producing over 50 surgical cases per month after one year of operation. • Expanded service oiTerings in Cardiology including the beginning of a diagnostic cardiac catheterization program. • Completed a $2.0 million facility renovation for the Women's Center. • Recruited Internal Medicine and OB/GYN physicians for independent medical practices affiliated with the hospital. • Achieved reaccreditation by The Joint Commission in November 2015 with the highest composite score in Community Health System. • Recognized by The Joint Commission as a Top Performer on key Quality Measures in 2011, 2012, 2013 & 2014. • Achieved Gold Seal reaccreditation by The Joint Comi3lission for both the Knee and Hip Joint Replacement programs, • Achieved Chest Pain Center accreditation from the Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care. Gregory G. Repctti,111 Page 2 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE (Continued): CHS Rockwood Clinic: member of Rockwood Health System Chief Operating Officer (2013-2014) COO responsible for the day-to-day operations of a 300 provider multispeciaity group practice (practice is affiliated with Community Health Systems). The organization has over 50 locations in Eastern Washington and Northern Idaho. The organizations has over 850,000 clinic visits annually, 1200 FTEs, and net revenues of over $160 million. • Improved financial performance by 43% in one year, from an EBITDA loss of $13.7 rnillion in 2012 to $7.8 million in 2013. • Improved labor productivity 5% from $122 per patient visit to $116 per patient visit. • Increased patient access and revenue through expansion of primary care provider contact hours to 37 for full time providers resulting in $1.4M in unproved. EBITDA. • Implemented balanced scorecard based upon financial, growth, quality, patient service, safety and human resource metrics to provide transparency to all constituents within the organization. • Assisted in the recruitment and start-up of 18 physicians and 2.4 non -physician providers in 2103. • Completed the transition of Clinic owned GI Ambulatory Surgery Center to new hospital partner owned facility to increase reimbursement, • Completed the transition of outpatient infusion services from two hospital partners to a Clinic owned facility increasing Clinic EBITDA $2.0M in 2013. • Implemented plan to reduce outside lease costs by approximately $175,000 annually through better utilization of available clinic space. • Developed plans for 3 new and opened one new primary care facilities to expend the geographic footprint and patient capture in markets currently underserved by Rockwood providers, CIIS )deaconess Medical Center: member of Rockwood Health System Chief Operatiini Officer (2010-2013) COO responsible for leading a 388 bed tertiary investor-owned hospital (hospital is owned by Community Health System). It is the central hospital in a developing regional Integrated Delivery System along with Valley Hospital—a 123 bed partner hospital, and Rockwood l nic—a 300 provider multispecialty physician group with over 50 locations. The organization has 12,000 admissions, 14,000 surgical procedures annually, 1450 FTEs, net revenues of $2.82 million and an EBITDA of approximately $20 million. • Improved financial performance from annual Ei3ITDA of zero in 2008 to EBITDA of almost $20 million in 2010. EBITDA for 2011 is $24 million and projected acted S 1 million in 2012, • Spearheaded effort to improve productivity without a reduction in force. Results to date are 20% improvement in productivity from the year ending 2009, Gregory G. Repetti, III Page 3 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE (Continued) • Integrated Rockwood Clinic into the organization by relocating 60,000 square feet of office space and a four -room Ambulatory Surgery Center on to the Deaconess Campus in 120 days, Worked with other senior leaders to complete contract negotiations with SEIU for the technical and support. services personnel and SMEA for the plant and maintenance personnel. • Developed a comprehensive facility master plan to address the ten-year growth needs of the organization. • Developed a partnership with Ohstctrix for the provision o Fmstcrnal/fetal medicine coverage and for the development of on obstetrical hospitalist program. • Completed the contract negotiation and acquisition of neurosurgical practice as part of strategic development plan fbr necuroscience& • Completed restructuring of hospital -owned physician practices in partnership with Rockwood to reduce costs and increase reimbursement. ▪ Coordinated over $20 million in construction and renovation projects including the fit out of over 20,000 square feet of medical office space, as well as remodeling the operating room, patient rooms and various life safety improvements. REPETTI HEALTHCARE CONSULTING Edwards, Colorado President (2008-2010) Founded and operated a small boutique health care consulting practice. Projects included: senior, management team development, physician practice ownership, physician compensation, practice management operational improvement and strategic service expansion, VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER Vail, Colorado President & Chief Executive officer (2005-2008) CEO responsible for leading community hospital with nine remote ambulatory locutions, a coramunity Cancer center (Shaw Regional Canoer Center), a joint ventured ambulatory surgical center (Vail Valley Surgery Center), and the clinical home to world-renowned Steadman Hawkins orthopedic clinic. The organization has 2,600 admissions, more tlian 8,000 surgical procedures, 600 FTEs, net revenues of $170 million and a consolidated gain of over 10% annually. • Improved financial performance of all entities, increasing hospital net revenue by 25% and ambulatory surgical center net revenue by 100% in three years, generating annual cash flows of 19 million in FY 2006 and FY 2007 and a projected cash flow of $24 million in FY 2008. • Improved relationships with the medial staff by working to promote win-wiu partnerships. These included the creation of a joint ventured imaging program with orthopedic surgeons, performance-based Gregory G. Repetti, III Page 4 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE CE (Continued): leases with the primary care physicians, hospital employment for selected sub -specialists and the inclusion of` medical staff leadership in decision-making processes. • Unproved the provision of cancer care by establishing an affiliation between the Shaw Regional Cancer Center and the University of Colorado Cancer Center dor access to clinical trials, recruiting a full -tune Medical Oncologist, restructuring the contract of the full-time Radiation Oncologist, achieving accreditation from the Amei.iean College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer, establishing multidisciplinary clinics for breast and prostata cancer, establishing a genetics screening program, creating an affiliate location in partnership with the Aspen Valley Hospital and working with the community raise the funds and to construct a. cancer caring house. • Established a formal Quality improvement pi-ograrn which included the creation of a Board of Trustee committee on quality, the development of quality indicators and a balance scorecard for monitoring progress and working with the medical staff to develop revised peer review process. Developed and implemented a mandatory critical cars consult service to improve the care of patients in the intensive care unit and both an adult and pediatric hospitalise program to improve the care in the remainder of the hospital. • Created a service-oriented culture, which focused on the patient experience throughout the organization. This included the hiring of a patient experience coordinator, the development of annual service training programs for staff and volunteers, the establishment of the patient concierge, arts in healing and pet partners programs. The results of these efforts were to raise patient satisfaction from the 43`1 percentile to the 82nd percentile in the Avatar data base, the winning of Avatar's Innovation awards in 2007 and 2008 for MR1 ultrasound and breast imaging, and the winning of Avatar's Exceeding Expectations Award in 2007. • Developed and implemented a comprehensive information technology strategic plan with an end goal to create a community health record. The first steps included the installation of the Cerner Millennium patient information system, Athena practice management system, the Kronos time and attendance system, the GE PACS system and several other smaller support systems. • Acquired and expanded several specialist practices and created a medical service organization to manage these and several other practices. Practices acquired included urology, cardiology, OB/GYN and plastic surgery. • Expanded service offerings throughout the communities served by developing and constructing a 35,000 square foot ambulatory building in a community 30 miles west of the hospital, opening an urgent care center, opening four new outpatient physical therapy centers throughout oentrai Colorado, and expanding the Eagle Care indigent clinic to meet the organizational service mission. Gregory G. Repeal, Ill Page 5 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE (Continued): SILVER CROSS HOSPITAL Joliet, Illinois Executive Vice ('resident &. Chief Operating Officer (1996-2005) Vice President, Operations (1993-1996) Senior Executive responsible for leading a progressive 304 bed community hospital named by Solucient in March 2006 and 2005 as a 100 Top Hospital, and in March 2004 as a 100 Top Hospital: Performance Improvement Leader, and recipient of a 2004 American Alliance of Healthcare Providers Choice Award witli 15,500 annual admissions, 1200 FTE's, $200 million in revenue and operating profits of % annually. • Reduced operating costs per adjusted discharge by more than 20% from 1996-2005. Hospital operated in the top quartile of Solucient database. • Coordinated quality improvement and utilization management program resulting in a reduction in Medicare length of stay over two years by 2.0 days. • Developed a strategic balanced scorecard, which captured financial, productivity, clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction and human resource data, This scorecard was used to focus initiatives and communicate results to all levels of the organization, • Led the effort to improve patient satisfaction, which improved scores to the top quartile of the Press Ganey database. • Established. Centers of Excellence by partnering with regional leaders in Neurosurgery, Orthopedics, Pediatrics and Oncology resulting in increased admissions and market share. This strategy was recognized as a best practice by the Heald,care Advisory Board. • Expanded cardiovascular services including the establishment of a joint ventured outpatient cardiac catheterization laboratory, Catheterization volume tripled over a three year period, • Planned and implemented facilities development, which included the construction oi'more than S120 million in improvements over 10 years. Projects included a 100,000 square foot patient care pavilion, a 70,000 square foot medical office building, major internal patient care unit renovations and other major infrastructure construction projects. PA LI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL — MAIN LINE HEALTH, INC. Paoli, Pennsylvania .Associate Vice President (1988-1993) Member of the Senior Leadership team at a 200 bed coininunity hospital, which was a member of Main Line Health. Led operational management of all service and several clinical departments, and directed over 225 FTEs. • Co-chaired the work redesign initiative resulting in increased patient, physician and employee satisfaction and reduced costs by $800 per patient day. Gregory G. Repetti, Ill Page 6 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE (Continued): • Completed the development of the outpatient cancer treatment facility in partnership with Fox Chase Cancer Center. • Managed all major construction projects including MR1, cardiac catheterization laboratory, two medial offices and a parking facility. THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Associate Hospital Administrator (1986-1988) Assistant to the Administrator (1984-1986) Administrator. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (1982-1984) EDUCATION tasters of Health Administration Bac]Zelor o i' Science. Biology The Ohio State University -1982 Yale University — 1980 PRESENTATIONS: • "CO() Boot Camp", ACHE Congress with Connie Curran, March 2003 • "Using PEERnext Data to Improve Performance", 2003 Solucient Client Conference, April 2003 ■ "Morph ng the Organization Quantum Strategies of Business Development", Voice of America Internet Radio, May 2003 ✓ "COO Boot Camp", ACHE Congress with Chuck Stokes, February 2004 • "Strategic Balance Scorecards", ACHE Audio/Web Conference with Chuck Stokes, October 2004 • "CO() Boot. Camp", ACHE Congress with Chuck Stokes & Robert Chappell, March 2005 • "Walking the Tight Rope: COO Strategies for Success", ACHE Program with Chuck Stokes and Robert Chappell, December 2005 • "COO Boot Camp", ACHE Congress with. Chunk Stokes & Robert Chappell, March 2006 • Leadership Boot Camp: Essential Skills for Executive Development", University of Alabama Birmingham Center of Health Services Continuing Education National Symposium For IIealthcare Executives with Chuck Stokes and Robert Chappell, July 2006 • "Leadership ; Challenges for the New CEO", Colorado School of Mines Engineeri n g and Technology Management Executive in Residence Program, October 2006 ▪ "Walking the Tight Rope: COO Strategies for Success", ACHE Program with Chuck Stokes and Robert Chappell, October 2006 • "COO Boot Camp", ACHE Congress with Chuck Stokes and Robert Chappell, March 2007 • Leadership: Challenges for the New CEO's, Colorado School of Mines Engineering and Technology Management Executive in Residence Program, November 2007 • "Walking the Tight Rope: COO Strategies for Success", ACHE Program with Chuck Stokes and Robert Chappell, December 2007 • "COO Boot Camp", ACHE Congress with Chuck Stokes and Robert Chappell, March 200 Gregory G. Rep a tti, III Page 7 • "C00 Strategies for Success", ACHE Program with Chuck Stokes, Robert Chappell and Florence Spyrow, December 2008 • "000 Boot Camp", }AHE Congress with Florence Spyrow and Robert Chappell, March 2009 • "Walking the Tight Rope: C'00 Strategies for Success", ACHE Program with Chuck Stokes and Robert Chappell, December 2009 AFFILIATIONS • Fellow, American College of Healthcare Executives • Life Member and Former Executive Committee Member, 'The Ohio State University Graduate Program in Health Services Management and Policy Alumni Association • Former Chairperson, Greater Philadelphia Health Assembly COMMUNITY SERVICE • Chairperson, Greater Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce. Spokane Valley, Washington • Board Member, Greater Spokane Incorporated, Spokane, Washington • Board Member, Visit Spokane, Spokane Washington • Board Member 8z Treasurer, Hub Sports Center, Liberty Lake, Washington • Advisory Board Member, College of Health Science &. Public Health, Eastern Washington University, Cheney Washington • Honorary Base Commander 92nd Air Refueling Wing, Fairchild Air Force Base, Airway Heights, Washington. • Member, Pastoral Advisory Committee, St. Augustine Parish, Spokane Washington • Member, Yale Football Association • Event Co -Chairperson, American Cancer Society, 2016 Coaches vs. Cancer Gala Spokane Washington • Former IVfember, Pastor Advisory 'rnrnittee, St. Clare of Assisi Parish, Edwards, Colorado • Former Board Member and Former Chairperson, The Vail Valley Partnership, Vail, Colorado • Fonner Board Member and Vice Chairperson, Mail Christian High School, Vail, Colorado • Former Board Member, Vail Valley Soccer Club, Vail, Colorado • Former Board Member, VHA Mountain States • Former Advisory Board Member, Eagle Air Alliance, Eagle County, Colorado • Former Board Member and Chairperson, Joliet Region Chamber of Commerce and Industry • Former Board Member and Board President, Joliet Area Historical Museum • Former Member, Council of Regents, Lewis University, Romcoville, Illinois • Former Board Member, Will County Center for Economic Development • Farmer Board Member, Yale Club of Chicago • Former Member Pastoral Council, Chairperson Architectural Design Committee, Holy Spirit Catholic Gornmunity, Naperville, Illinois Stamm .0•01FMHH€-. Application Form for Committees/Boards/Com missions azo }, Dc sof? /of t p° 'ie. Return Mori , Clerk at City Ha 10 E. Spr. sue Avenue Spakan- e WA 09205 509-720-5102 phone; 500-720-5080 fax POSITION APPLYING FOR U i 60 Fri .i r're? Applicant's name (please print): LL. 1 YL Applicant's Residence Address:+' rY . it►[sJ+ c� 4,- -5,0Q City y l / Street Zip Code Applicant's Mailing Address (if d:rfferenl rrcm Re9idPnre address); Street City Zip Corfe Applicant's Email: ekx /61 t i ,, C. C 11% Horne Phone; -.561 ` - 9 i 1- 10 L Work Phone: f -' Cell Phone: 710— 3 4, f Length of time continuously lived within Spokane Valley City Limits: 1 674i,- f er' a NOTE: You must be a resident of the City of Spokane Valley to participate an most beards, committees and commissions, Gender Tcmale I] Male MI U.S. Citizen? 9 e 5 a. State Registered voter? V 5 EMPLOYMENT YMENY TRYA Present orlast employer: Oi! t -c 4 t'' Position Held: to Dates of Employment: if ' Address: /dice n x Spok tit e UAL iff Q y /t Phone: 9i4 V.- 3 41 Sri 4,011 t iy,Li 44 et. S r' 1 f F t! 1 S o k - Previous Employer: Vit 6. Position Held: Address: Dates of Employment: Phone: EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: High School: IA! r l/ 'JL y gf Diploma: Yes 1Vn M City/State Address .. Collegef[Tniversity: dtr 7 f'rot "rt f e, r 5 0,` City. State Address: n y W J fA College/University: City/State Address: Degree Earned: Degree Earned: City o.fSpokane Valley Applicalion for Corm[ttees/BoardslCornu i [912017] Page 1 oft COMMUNITY RELATED ACTIVITIES, PAST & PRESENT: (attach additional r,l:c.c t s if necessary) it 'i 0 4 r Ceti, .s '';firty ICVOLUNTEER EXPERENCES, ' T & PRESENT: c r LI I/ iti Ldi-tart, e_ l rr~ j C OM /? f /- i 13 5p,,,, t r eFL Y" L"L" e -t f' SPECIAL SKILLS/INTERESTS:Y/ 4.55 e. ,• 1r S. Lt re /0 y es, PASTOR PRESS MEMBER OF THE FOLLOWING PROFESSIONAL, CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS OR GOVERNMENTBOARDS, COMMITTEES, OR COMMISSION& &tit! Jr 1t y_ { .o ck o tj' 5 } f a 5 J l" rdY r+ Committee Name City/State V I, p ettitt. }� r rl a csr Committee Na111C an; titial Fru e1 S li # ; Committee Name 1Cr , .iLy7Statc ty/State What do you feel you can contribute to the community that may not be evident from information already furnished.? q h t5 Grl ►'1 td • e vele- nkn o& ) {yam of a. -... 4 rr _ ca./ ley • Why do you feel you are qualified to act as a member of the Board, Committee or Cornmission for which you are applying? 114.41 dt r aC 541,L.36Wi u /f r ,t „ / E- r')\ + Cyr} )a- 11 Would your appointment to this position create a conflict of interest or an appearance of a conflict of interest? P1,10 e SIgt�.ture ci7 'Today's Date City of Spokane Valley Appliculiori it r Co ces!Boan! srC'oz-iroissio ris [9/2017] Pagc 2 oft {L15ilF Mune 40,0:Ualley� Application Form for Committees/Boards/Commissions x POSITION APPLYING FOR: Lodging Tax Advisory Committee -19-17Ari8; 0 RCVD Return Completed form to City Clerk at City Hall, 10210 E. Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, WA 99206 509-720-5102 phone: 509-720-5080 fax Applicant's name (please print): Tom Stebbins Applicant's Residence Address: 12428 N West Newman Lake Drive Newman Lake 99025 Street City Zip Code Applicant's Mailing Address (if different /tom Residence addres-s): PO Box 85 Newman Lake S9025 Street City Zip Code Applicant's Email; torn ovision-marketin .net Home Phone: none Work Phone: 5Q9.621.O125 Cell Phone: 509,869.0343 Length of time continuously lived within Spokane Valley City Limits: not required, NOTE: You must be a resident of the City of Spokane Valley to participate on most boards, committees and commissions. Gender: Female I1=1 Male U.S. Citizen? Yes Vi,ra, State Registeied voter? Yes E vIPLOYME T HISTORY: Present or last employer: sei F employed Position Held: Address: same as above _ Phone: 509.621.0125 Dates of Ernployment: 1/1/97 to present Previous Employer: Washington State & Michigan State Athletics Position Held: Asst. Athletic Director, Mktg Protnas Dates of Employment: 8/10/36 to 7/31/95 Address: Phone: EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: High School: Capital 1jigh School Diploma: Yes - No City/State Address Helena, M'1` College/University: Montana State University Degree Earned: BS, :business Finance City/State Address: Bozeman, MT C;ollege/I : r1 [versify: St. Thomas University Degree Earned: MS, Business Admin_ City/State Address: Miarrtl, FL City of Spokane Valley Appli atk n for CauunitteesiBeards/Cammissions [9(2017] I .'A Page 1 oft COMMUNITY RELATED A FI k' 11lES, PAST & PRESENT: • Member of Spokane Downtown Rotary Club #21 since 1995. o Member- or the Youth Services Committee o Chair, Program Committee 2002 - 2008 o Past Board Member 2002 & 2003 • Leadership Spokane class of 1997. • Hoopfcst Marshall 1999 to 2009. • Sports Leadership Ministry Board Member, 2007 to 2011. • Involved in securing Funding/grant .from Paul Allen fund in the late 90's to improve irrigation and grading at Camelot Park in N Spokane when I lived nearby. • Newman Lake Flood Control Zone District Board member, 2012 - 2016 • ACTTON for Newman Lake committee, {binding member, 2016 to current, • Greater Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce member, 2017 to current. VOLUNTEER EXPERIENCES. NCES. PAST & PRESS': ■ Past: Hoopfest, Habitat for Humanity, Sports. Leadership Ministries, NLFCZD board. ■ Current: Rotary. Newman Lake Property Owners clean-up days & other activities SPECIAL SKILLS] NTERESTS: As a small business owner I'm exposed to the entire spectrum of what a business takes from accounting, sakes, marketing and execution. Specifically, over a thirty year career I've produced hundreds of events and solicited over fifteen million dollars in sponsor or donation support. PAST OR PRESENT MEMBER OF THE FOLLOWING PROFESSIONAL, CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS OR GOVERN . BOARDS, CONa111'1'EES, OR COMI1,IISSIONS: • Spokane Rotary #21 board member 2002 & 2003 • Spokane Rotary #21 chair, Program Committee 2002 — 2008. • Newman Lake Flood Control Zone District Advisory Committee member-, 2012.. — 201.6 What do you feel you can contribute to the community that may not be evident from information already furnished? T have a desire to serve and become part of the community in which I work. My professional skill set and business activities provide a unique perspective to provide value to the City of Spokane 'Malley and the lodging tax committee. Why do you feel you are qualified to act as a member of the Board, Committee or Commission for which you are applying? 1 am applying for the opening of a member involved in activities authorized to be funded by the tax" Professionally 1 have worked in tourism for over twelve years and events for over thirty years with experiences locally, regionally and nationally from producing events, to ownership and soliciting funds to support events. Would your appointment to this position create a conflict of interest or an appearance of a conflict of interest? Only as_ described directly above m . " vol ed in activities authorized to be funded. by the tax), ifrfir Signature / Today's Date (c7,48/7 Cit}' ot-Spokanc Valley Application for Cownmittees/Boards/Comnissious [9/20171 Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 9, 2018 Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ information ® admin. report Department Director Approval: ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Solid Waste Collection Street -Wear Fee PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council approved the solid waste main collection contract with Waste Management on May 23, 2017 and the solid waste drop -box contracts on December 12, 2017. BACKGROUND: In early 2016 the City began a competitive process for solid waste collection services. On April 4, 2017 the staff evaluation of the proposals received were presented, with Council choosing the service option of a single exclusive hauler providing single-family, multi- family, and commercial solid waste service (known as the main contract), and multiple haulers providing drop -box collection service (known as the drop -box contracts). These new contracts have been authorized by Council and are set to begin April 1, 2018. The estimated savings achieved by the competitive process for both the main contract and drop -box contracts was approximately $1.5 million annually over the then -current solid waste rates. Since that time, the existing rates have been modified three times for (1) an adjustment to the recycling commodity credit by the state, (2) an adjustment to the disposal rate component, and (3) a CPI (inflation) adjustment to the collection component. The difference (or delta) between the old rates and the new rates has remained largely intact. Through the last two budget cycles, staff and City Council have had ongoing discussions regarding appropriate funding for street maintenance and street preservation. Council included in its discussion that the significant savings between the new and existing solid waste collection rates could be a potential source of street maintenance funding. Accordingly, staff has researched potential options for City Council to consider and focused on a street -wear fee through the main solid waste contract since it specifically addresses uses that have significant impacts on the streets — repetitive use of streets by large garbage trucks. Revenues from a street -wear fee would be required to be used to mitigate and address the impacts giving rise to them, which in this case would be street maintenance to repair impacts from the garbage trucks. Staff decided to focus on the main contract for the following reasons: (1) the drop -box contract has multiple haulers with different rates that are capped but not fixed, making administration of the street -wear fee more difficult; (2) the drop -box contract has much less annual revenue, $600,000 versus $11.5 million for the main contract; and (3) a savings delta was not achieved through the competitive process for drop -box service. The capped rates did not come in lower than the existing rates but the haulers may set rates that are lower than the capped amounts but we will not know that until after the contracts begin. The main contract for solid waste collection presented a challenge in applying a street impact and administration fee. The savings were greater for some service lines than others. The goal for staff was to identify an option that allows the City to capture as much of the delta as possible while keeping rates at or below the current levels. Applying a street -wear fee as a percentage of each service line amount that captures all of the delta would cause some service line rates to increase over current rates. Applying a street -wear fee that would keep all rates at or below existing levels would leave much of the delta uncaptured. To remedy this problem, Waste Management agreed to shift some revenues between service lines to allow the City to apply a consistent fee percentage, capturing most of the delta while maintaining the service rates at or below existing rates for almost all service lines. The end result was a maximum street -wear fee of 12.5% that captures approximately $1.5 million annually while keeping rates at or below current levels for all customers except for 81 commercial customers with detachable containers who will see a slight increase. Some fees for extra pickups and extra services will also see a slight increase. In addition, approximately 2,500 customers that currently use their own cans will be required to switch to Waste Management carts and will likely see an increase of about $1 per month as they switch to other service lines if the full 12.5% fee is applied. One note for these customers is that even with the maximum 12.5% fee, they will still have lower rates than unincorporated Spokane County for similar sized collection. In addition to the street -wear fee applied to collection, staff has also begun looking at applying the same fee to self -haulers at the transfer station. As this does not have the same time constraints as the collection contracts, this concept will be discussed later in the year when the larger discussion regarding street maintenance and preservation occurs. Further detail on the 12.5% street impact and administration fee is provided in the attached spreadsheet. If Council determines to move forward with a street impact and administration fee, it will require a contract amendment to the main contract, which would be subject to Council consideration and approval. Staff is looking for Council direction on whether to proceed with a contract amendment to incorporate a street -wear fee into the rates, to pursue other options, or to do nothing further at this time. OPTIONS: Council consensus for staff to prepare and provide a contract amendment for a street impact and administration fee in an amount determined by Council, for Council Consideration at a future meeting; take other action deemed appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Council discretion. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Street impact and administrative fee revenues of $1.4 - $1.5 million annually (with annual CPI adjustments) with 12.5% fee. STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Koudelka, Senior Administrative Analyst; Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney; Henry Allen, Senior Engineer: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint and (3) Rate Comparisons Solid Waste Collection Street -Wear Fee January 9, 2018 Morgan Koudelka, Senior Administrative Analyst Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney Henry Allen, Senior Engineer Competitive Solid Waste Collection Process ► Request for Proposals issued in late 2016 ► Four proposals received in early 2017 ► Staff evaluated and scored proposals ► Council selected the Status Quo service option with Waste Management providing exclusive service to single-family, multi -family, and commercial subscribers utilizing standard containers (main contract), and multiple haulers providing drop -box service to any residential or commercial property (drop - box contracts). ► Approximately $1.5 million in annual savings were achieved through this process, primarily through a reduction in the main contract service rates. Street Maintenance and Preservation Funding Issues ► The City is currently re-evaluating its approach to maintaining and preserving City streets but continues to be challenged to find revenue sources that will maintain streets in satisfactory condition. ► A full garbage truck can weigh over 50,000 pounds and have the same impact to a street as 1,340 passenger cars (IMS Study for Spokane Valley, the heavier a load the more damage it does). At the request of Council and the Finance Committee, staff evaluated the ability to capture the total annual savings in solid waste collection rates through a street- wear fee while maintaining the service rates at or below current levels. The new collection contracts take effect on April 1, 2018 and the main contract currently contains a provision for a 1.0% administrative fee but does not currently anticipate any recovery of costs associated with impact to the streets by garbage trucks. 3 Challenges ► Reductions achieved through the competitive process varied by service lines, with different percentage reductions for different service options. ► Applying a straight percentage fee to all revenues may cause some rates to be greater than current rates or cause some savings to go uncaptured. Waste Management agreed to shift revenue between service lines in the main contract to satisfy the City's goals. Revenue captured at different fee rates. ► 12.5% = $1,460,878 (Captures full delta) ► 6% = $700,069 (Stabilizes rates for can users and MW commercial) ► 5% = $584,874 (Stabilizes rates w/o revenue shift) Impact to Rates with 12.5% Street -Wear Fee Most garbage customers (approximately 26,000 total) would have rates that are at or below current rates. 81 commercial customers with detachable containers that are picked up multiple times per week would experience a slight increase. ► 61 will have an increase of 1% or less ► 18 will have an increase of 2.1% ► 1 will have an increase of 2.5% ► 1 will have an increase of 3.3% ► Yard waste customers will have rates increase $.09 per month ( .8% ) Some charges (extra garbage and extra carts) and some extra services (carry out and lock/unlock) will have a slight increase. Customers that Currently Use Own Can ► As part of the selection process, Council selected as a service alternative, universal ► All curbside subscription residential customers are now required to use Waste Management carts instead of customer -owned cans ► Reasons for making switch R More efficient - drivers no longer have to exit vehicle ► Safer - Driver not injured lifting cans (automated truck lift) ► Fewer complaints - Most complaints are from can customers with lost or damaged lids and cans ► Savings - All residential customers have rates reduced by $.17 per month ► Approximately 2,500 customers currently use their own cans. Most customers would experience an increase of approximately $1 per month to switch to carts if a 12.5% fee was assessed. There would be no increase if the fee was 6% and the revenue shift by WM was still in place. If there was no revenue shift then a 5% fee would result in no increase for can customers. With a 12.5% fee, the rate for a 35 gallon cart would still be $.90 less than in the unincorporated County. 7 Why are the drop -box contracts excluded? No delta to capture - Rates came in at or higher than current rates Multiple haulers and different rates make administration and verification more difficult Rates are caps and can fluctuate frequently Revenue at 12.5% fee would be only $75,000 vs. $1.5M for main contract Fee at Transfer Station on Self -Haulers ► A street -wear fee on self -hauler loads at the transfer station will be included with the larger street maintenance discussion later this year. Comparative Costs ► A Spokane Valley customer that has weekly service on a 35 gallon cart, including recycling and the state refuse tax, will pay $2.67/per month less than a customer receiving equivalent service in the unincorporated County. ► With a 12.5% street -wear fee, the Spokane Valley customer will pay $.90 less per month. Why now? ► The new solid waste collection contract begins April 1, 2018. ► If the delta is captured now the impact to customers will be minimal. ► If the new rates go into effect without the street -wear fee but a street -wear fee is applied later, then it will result in an increase to rates. Next steps ► Council provides direction to staff on whether to pursue a street -wear fee. ► Should Council desire to pursue a street -wear fee, staff will prepare a contract amendment to the main collection contract with Waste Management and present to Council at a future meeting. Benefit ► Utilizing a solid waste collection street -wear fee leverages savings achieved through a competitive service delivery selection process to secure additional funding for street maintenance and preservation without an additional cost to citizens and business owners (in most cases). Admin Fee & Rate Modeling for the City of Spokane Valley 5% Street -wear Fee December 1, 2017 Disposal Rate per ton, not including Refuse Tax: 4 98.24 6 & O Tax Rate. 1.9% (A) (DtE=F) (G) (F -G=11) (1110) (AxCx12) (AxEx12) Page 1 of 3 Service Level Customer Counts Adjusted WWI Rates as of 4/1/2019 WITH New Admin Fee Current Rates AFTER the pi$ppsal Change effective 1211!2017 5 Difference of Adjusted Rates vs. 121112017 Rates Lower (Higher) %D110515 ce of Adjusted Rates vs. 12/112017 Rates Lower/ (Nigher) Total Annual Admin Fee Calcu fated Monthly' One 35 gallon Garbage Cart 269 6 11.78 $ 12.64 $ 0.86 6.6% 5 2,034 Weekly' Residential Curbside Garbage Service Andes Recycil One 10113 gallon Micro-Can/Cad $ 14.07 $ 15.00 $ 1.02 6.8% $ - One 20 -gallon Garbage Cart 1,766 $ 14.96 $ 16.05 $ 1.09 6.501 5 16,318 1 35 -gallon Garbage Cart 12,711 $ 17 90 $ 19.19 $ 1.29 7.0% $ 735,753 i 45 -gallon Garbage Cart - 5 21.61 -0.0% 5 - 1 54 -gallon Garbage Cart 6,562 $ 24.74 5 26.53 $ 1.79 7.2% 5 94,493 1 95 -gallon Garbage Cart -1362 5 31.59 $ 3388 $ 2.29 7.4% 5 31.716 Additional 35 Gallon Carts {weekly svo) - $ 5.92 0.0% $ - Extras (32 gallon equivalent) 1.006 6 4.22 $ 3.67 $ (0.55) -13.0% 15 2.414 Yard Dobris Curbside Service Subscription Yard Debris Service - 20 -gallon Cart - $ 7.09 0.0% 15 - Subscription Yard Debris Seance -32-35 gallon Cart • 5 7.62 0.0% 3 - Subscritp5on Yard Debris Service-64•gallon Cart - $ 9.01 0.0% $ - Subscription Yard Debris -96 -gallon Cart 10,395 $ 10.41 $ 11.07 $ 0.56 6.0% 3 58528 Extra Yard Debris (32 gallon) 132 $ 3.15 $ 3.03 $ {0.12) -3.8% $ 237 ''Additional Yard Debris Cart -Any Size - $ 6.30 $ 5.35 $ (0.95) .15.1% $ - hAlscellaneous Fees Return Trip 25 $ 5.30 $ 8.69 $ 2.39 37.9% $ A9 Recycling Only (510 Garbage Service) $ 9.08 $ 5.53 $ (3.40) .37.4% $ Additional Recycling Cart $ 1.54 $ (1.84) -100.0% $ - Oversize Container (per unit) $ 3.98 $ 3.88 $ (0.10) -2.5% $ - Carry Out 5 to 25 feet $ 0.53 $ 0.51 5 (0.02) -3.8% $ - Carry Out over 25 feet $ 0.32 $ 1.81 5 0.31 $ 1.75 5 (0.03) $ 03.65) -3.1% -2.8% $ - $ - Distance Drive In: Over 125 and less than 250' Distance Drive In: Over 250 and less than 1110 mile $ 2.34 $ 2,25 $ (3.66) -2.5% $ Distance Drive in: Each 1110 mile aver 1/10 mile. $ 3.50 5 3.41 $ (6.09) -2.6% 5 - Roll out Charge, per 25 feet, parsed, per lime $ 3.15 5 2.38 5 (0.77) -24.4% 5 - Drive in Charge per month $ 5.30 5 7.61 5 1.31 20.8% $ - Overweight/Oversize container per pfu 9 $ 3.15 $ 10.51 If 3.88 6 17.58 $ 0.73 $ 7.07 23.2% 67.3% $ - $ 57 Redelivery of one or more containers Cart Cleaning $ 10.51 $ 12.53 $ 2.02 19.2% $ - Weekly Cpmmercial Can and Cart One 20 -gallon Garbage Cart - 5 13.27 0.0% $ - 135•gallon Garbage Cart 348 3 15.72 $ 18.93 $ 1.21 7.7% $ 3,174 1 45 -gallon Garbage Cart - 5 18.98 $ - 0.0% $ - 1 34 -gallon Garbage Cart 46 $ 22.18 $ 20.72 $ 7-54 34.0% $ 591 1 96 -gallon Garbage Cart 71 $ 28.40 $ 42.53. $ 14.13 49.8% $ 1,157 Extras (22 -gallon equivalent) 357 $ 4_22 - 1 (4.22) -100.0% $ 857 Weekly 96 -gallon Gart Yard Debris 23 $ 9.59 $ 3.15 $ 11.07 5 3.03 $ 1.38 5 (0.12) 14.2% -3.8% $ 130 $ - Extra Yard Debris (32 gallon) Return Trip $ 6.30 $ 13.86 $ 7.55 120.0% $ - RolloutCharge.per 25 feet, percart, per time 5 1.58 $ (1.58) -100.0% 5 - Oversize Container (per unit) $ 5.99 $ 3.88 $ (0.10) -2.5% $ - Gamy Out 5 to 25 feet $ 0.53 $ 0.51 $ (0.02) -3.8% $ - Carry Out over 25 feet $ 0.32 5 0.31 9 (0.01) -3.1% 5 - Distance Drive In: Over 125 and less than 250' $ 1 81 $ 1.76 5 (0.05) -2.8% $ - Distance Drive In. Over 250' end less than 1/10 mile 5 2.34 5 2.28 $ (0.05) -2.6% $ - Distance Drive In: Each 1/10 mile over 1110 mile. $ 3.50 5 10.51 $ 3.41 $ 17.58 5 (0.09) $ 7.07 -2.6% 67.3% 5 - $ Redelivery of Containers Cart Cleaning $ 10.51 $ 12.53 $ 2.02 19.2% $ - Weekly Commercial 1 Cubic Yard Container, 1 piekup/EOW week $ 60.96 1 (60.96) -140.0% $ - 1 Cubic Yard Container. 1 pickupfweek $ 121.93 $ (121.93) -100.045 $ - Page 1 of 3 Admin Fee & Rate Modeling for the City of Spokane Valley S% Street -wear Fee December 1, 2017 Disposal Rale per ton, not including Refuse Tax: 98.24 6&0 Tac Rate' 1.5% (A) (D.E=F) (0) (F -0=H) (H/0) (AxCx12) (Ax&x12) Page 2 of 3 Service Level Customer Counts Adjusted MI Rates as of 4!1!2816 WITH New Ad min FEe Current Rates AFTER the Disposal Change effective 1211/2017 $ Difference of Adjusted Rates vs. 12/1/2017 Rates Lower/ (Higher) % Difference of Adjusted Rates vs. 1211/2017 Rates Lower! (Higher) Total Annual Admin Fee Calculated Detachable Container (compacted) 1.5 Cubic Yard Container, 1 picksplEOW week $ 87.03 $ (87.63) -100.0% 5 - 1.5 Cubic Yard Container, 1 pickuplweek $ 175.27 $ (175.27) -100.0% $ - 2 Cubic Yard Container, 1 plekuplEOW week $ 111.93 $ (111.99) -100.0% $ - 2 Cubic Yard Container, 1 pickup/week 4 $ 225_97 $ 340.49 $ 116.52 52.0% $ 519 3 Cubic Yard Container, 1 pic&op/EOW week $ 159.20 $ (159.20) -100.0% $ - 3 Cubic Yard Container, 1 pickup/week 5 $ 318.40 $ 493.56 3 175.16 55.0% $ 923 4 Cubic Yard Container, 1 pic10EOW week $ 200.87 $ (200.87) -100.0% $ - 4 Cubic Yard Container, 1 pickuplweek 4 $ 401.72 $ 638.41 $ 236.69 58.9% $ 931 6 Cubic Yard Container, 1 pickupIEOW week 3 $ 285.12 $ 570.23 $ 928.15 3 (295.12) $ 357.92 -100.0% 62.8% $ - $ 991 6 CublcYard Container. 1 pickup/week Commercial Detachable Container (loose) 1 Cubic Yard, 1 pickup/EOW week $ 32.93 $ 36.31 $ 3.38 10.3% $ - 1 Cubic Yard, 1 pickup/week 309 $ 65.86 $ 72.61 $ 6.75 10.2% $ 11,7991 1 Cubic Yard, 2 pickupslweek 18 $ 151,73 $ 138.32 $ 6.59 5.0% $ 1,374 1 Cubic Yard, 3 pickups/week 1 $ 197.60 $ 205.03 $ 7.43 3.8% $ 114 1 Cubic Yard, 4 pickups/week - $ 293.47 $ 271.24 $ 7.77 2.9% $ 1 Cubic Yard, 5 pickups/week - $ 329.34 $ 337-45 $ 8.11 25% $ - 1.5 Cubic Vent, 1 pidcup/EOW week 61 -$ 46.09 $ 92.16 $ 50.84 $ 101.67 $ 4.75 $ 9.51 10.3% 102% $ - $ 3.257 1.5 Cubic Yard, 1 pickup/week 1.5 Cubic Yard. 2 pickups/week 1 $ 184.33 $ 196.43 $ 12.10 6.6% 5 107 1.5 Cubic Yard, 3 pickups/week - $ 276.49 $ 291.19 $ 14.70 5.3% $ - 1.5 Cubic Yard, 4 pickupslweek - $ 36867 $ 385.95 $ 17.28 4.7% $ - 1.5 Cubic Yard, 5 pickups/week - $ 460.83 $ 480,71 $ 19.58 4.3% $ - 2 Cubic Yard, 1 pidiuplEOW week $ 57.21 63.17 $ 5.96 10.4% $ - 2CubicYard.1 pickups/ eek 298 $ 114.42 $ 126.33 $ 11.91 10.4% $ 19,775 2 Cubic Yard, 2 pickups/week 22 $ 226.85 $ 244.53 $ 15.68 6.9% $ 2,917 2 Cubic Yard, 3 pickups/week 1 $ 343.28 $ 362.73 $ 19.45 5.7% $ 199 2 Cubic Yard, 4 pickups/week - $ 457.70 $ 480.93 $ 23-23 5.1% $ - 2 Cubic Yard, 5 piekupe/week - $ 572.12 $ 590.13 $ 27.01 4.7% $ - Commercial Detachable Container (loose) 3 Cubic Yard, 1 plokuplEOW week $ 75.19 $ 86.42 $ 8.23 10.5% $ - 3Cubic Yard, 1pickuplweek 131 $ 156.37 $ 172.83 $ _ 16.46 10.5°% $ 11,869 3 Cubic Yard, 2 pickup&week 8 $ 312,75 $ 335.71 $ 22.96 7.3% $ 1,451 3 CubicYard, 3 pickupshneek - $ 469.13 $ 498.59 $ 29.46 6.3% $ - 3 Cubic Yard, 4 pickups/week - $ .625.50 $ 661.47 $ 35.97 5.8% $ - 3 Cubic Yard. 5 pickups/week - $ 781.87 $ 824.35 $ 42.48 5.4% $ - 4 Cubic Yard, 1 pickup/EOW week $ 94.34 $ 104.41 $ 10.07 10.7% b - 4 Cubic Yard, 1 pickup/week 262 $ 188.67 $ 206.82 $ 20.15 10.7% $ 28.642 4 Cubic Yard, 2 pickups/week 42 $ 377.36 $ 408.66 $ 29.30 7.8% 5 0,188 4 Cubic Yard, 3 pickups/week 8 $ 566.04 $ 604.50 $ 38.46 6.8% $ 2,625 4 Cubic Yard, 4 pickups/week - $ 754.72 $ 802.34 $ 4762 6.3% $ - 4 Cubic Yard, 5 pickups/week - $ 943.41 $ 1,000.18 $ 56.77 6.0% 3 - 6 Cubic Yard, 1 pickup/EOW week $ 127.45 $ 141.26 $ 93.81 10.8% $ - 6 Cubic Yard, 1 pickup/week 259 $ 254.88 $ 282.51 $ 27.63 10.8% $ 37,816 6 Cubic Yard, 2 pickups/week 82 $ 509.76 $ 550.29 $ 40.53 8.0% $ 24,226 6 Cubic Yard, 3 pickups/week 11 $ 764.64 $ 818.07. $ 53.43 7.0% $ 4,875 6 Cubic Yard, 4 pickups/week - $ 1,019.53 $ 1,085.85 $ 66.32 6.5% $ - 6 Cubic Yard, 5 pickupsNmsk 1 $ 1,274.41 $ 1,353.63 $ 79.22 6.2°% $ 739 6 Cubic Yard, 1 pickup/EOW week $ 15291 $ 169.79 $ 16.88 11.0% $ S Cubic Yard, 1 piokuprWeek 178 $ 505.83 $ 339.57 $ 33.74 11.0% $ 31,549 Page 2 of 3 Admin Fee & Rate Modeling for the City of Spokane Valley 5% Street -wear Fee December 1, 2017 Disposal Rata per ton, not including Refuse Tait 5 94 24 R & 0 Tax Rate: (A) 1.5- (D+E=F) (F-G=H) (91/D) (AxCx12) (AxEx12) Total $ 584,874 Page 3of3 Service Fes Revenue Shift Service Level Customer Counts Adjusted WAN Rates as of 411/2016 WITH New Admin Fee Current Rates AFTER the Disposal Change effective 12f152017 $ Difference of Adjusted Rates vs. 12/112017 Rates Lower! (Higher) % Difference of Adjusted Rates vs. 121112017 Rates Lower! (Higher) Tota€ Ann ua.l AdinIn Fee Calculated 8 Cubic Yard, 2 pickups/week 60 $ 611.67 $ 660.52 $ 48.85 8.05S $ 21,259 8 Cubic Yard, 3 pickups/Week 17 $ 917.50 $ 981.47 $ 63.97 7.0% S 9,939 8 Cubic Yard, 4 pickups/week 1 $ 1223.35 $ 1,302.37 $ 79.02 6.5% $ 799 8 Cubic Yard. 5 pickups/week 5 $ 1,529.19 $ 1,623_37 $ 94.16 8 2% $ 4.432 airs loose cubic yard in container, per pickup 101 $ 10-62 $ 18,57 $ 7.95 74.9% 8 619 Extra loose cubic yard on ground, per pickup 361 $ 21-13 $ 18.57 $ (2.56) -12.1% $ 4,423 Multifamily Recycling Fee (per cubic yard per pickup) 312 $ 1.36 $ 1.12 $ (0.24) -17.8% $ 202 Compactor Connect/DisconnectService $ 25.55 $ 25.86 $ (0.69) -2.6% 8 - Gate Service 35 46 $ 12.43 $ 12.43 $ 12.11 $ 12.20 $ (0.32) $ (0.23) -18% -1.996 $ 249 $ 331 Lock/Unlock Service Roll Out Fees 5 $ 2.45 $ 2.38. $ (0.97) -2.9% $ 7 Rall Out Fees Each Additional 5 ft over 25 ft $ 0.58 $ 0.56 $ 10.02) -3d% $ Stand-by Time $ 1.68 $ 11.88) -100.0% $ - Container Cleaning $ 10-51 $ 12.53 $ 2.02 19.2% $ - Redilivery of Containers $ 21.02 $ 29.27 $ 8.25 39-2% $ - Return Trip $ 10.51 5 13.88 $ 3.35 31.9% $ - Temporary Collec5an Hauling 2 Yard detachable Container, per pick up $ 30.11 $ 40.72 $ 10.61 35.2% $ - 4 Yard detachable container, per pick up $ 46.66 $ 59.09 $ 10-43 21A% $ - 6 Yard detachable container, per pick up $ 64.86 $ 75.25 $ 10.39 16.0% $ - 8 Yard detachable container. par pick up $ 76.70 $ 87.53 $ 10.83 14.1% $ - Temporary Collection Container Rental and Delivery 2 Yard detachable Container, daily $ 1.45 $ 1.34 $ (0.11) $ (0.17) -7.6% -7.2% $ - $ 4Yard detachable container, dal€y $ 2.35 $ 2.18 6 Yard detachable container, dally $ 2.57 $ 2.38 $ (0.19) -7.45‘ $ - 8 Yard detachable container, daily $ 3.12 $ 2 90 $ (0 22) -7.1% $ Delivery Fee $ 54.15 $ 45.71 $ (8.44) -15.6% S - Event Service Delivery, provision, collection, set of 2 cerin. garbage and recycling $ 26.27 061% 5 - Hourly Rates Roar/Ride-load packer -t driver $ 78.83 $ 70.74. $ (8.09) -10.3% $ Front -load packer+driver $ 78.83 $ 78.83 $ 70.74 $ 70.74 $ (8.09) $ (8.09) -10.3% -10.3% 8 - $ - DropBoxTrudt - Driver Additional Labor $ 78.83 $ 70.74 $ (8.09) -10-3% $ - Total $ 584,874 Page 3of3 Service Fes Revenue Shift Admin Fee & Rate Modeling for the City of Spokane Valley 6% Street -wear Fee December 1, 2017 Disposal Rate per ton, not including Refuse Tax: 6 & 0 Tar Rate - 5 00.24 1,518 (A) (D+E=F) (Gf (F-G=N) (HID) (AxCx11) (A xEx12) Page 1 of 3 S (20,132) 5 173,215) 3 5 (8,300) $ 11,629 Service Level Customer Counts Adjusted WM Rates as of 41112016 WITH New Adm in Fee Current Rales AFTER the Disposal ei#ect��e 12/112017 $ Difference of Adjusted Rates vs. 1211/2017 Rates Lowed (Higher) % Difference of Adjusted Rates vs. 121112017 Rates Lower/ (Higher) Total Annual Admin Fee Calculated Monthly' One 35 gallon Garbage Cart 269 $ 11.90 $ 12.64 $ 0.74 5.6% $ 2.453 Weekly' Residential Curbside Garbage Service dudes Recycli One 10/13 gallon Micro-Can/Cart $ 14.20 $ 15.09 $ 0.89 5.8% $ - One 20 -gallon Garbage Cart 1,766 $ 15.11 $ 16.05 5 0.94 5.9% $ 19.497 1 35 -gallon Garbage Cart 92,711 $ 18.05 $ 19.19 $ 1.13 6.1% $ 161654 1 45 -gallon Garbage Cart - $ 21.82 0.0% $ 1 64 -gallon Garbage Cart 6,562 $ 24.98 $ 26.53 $ 1.55 6.2% $ 113,391 1 96 -gallon Garbage Cart 1,762 $ 31.59 $ 33.88 $ 1.09 6.3% $ 36059 Additional 35 Gallon Carts (weekly svc) - $ 5.97 0.0% $ - Extras (32 gallon equivalent) 1,006 $ 4.26 $ 3.67 $ (0.59) -13.8k $ 2,897 Yard Debris Curbside Service Subscription Yard Debris Service - 20 -gallon Cart - $ 7.16 0.0% $ - Subscription Yard Debris Service - 32-35 gallon Cart - $ 7.69 0.0% $ - Subscritptlon Yard Debris Service-64-gallonCart - $ 9.11 0-0% $ - Subscdlption Yard Debris - 98 -gallon Cart 10,395 $ 10.55 $ 11.07 $ 0.57 5.8% 9 69,854 Extra Yard Debris (32 gallon) 132 $ 3.15 $ 3.03 $ (0.15) -4.7% $ 205 Additional Yard Debris Cart - Any Size - $ 5.37 $ 5.35 $ (1.02) -16.0% S - Miscellaneous Fees Return Trip 25 $ 5.57 $ 8.89 $ 2.32 36.4% £ 110 Recycling Only (No Garbage Service) $ 9.17 $ 5.68 $ (3.49) -38.1% S - Additional Recycling Cart $ 1.86 $ (1.85) -100.0% 5 - Oversize Container aper unit) $ 4.02 $ 3.88 $ (0.14) -3.5% $ - Carry Out 5 to 25 feel $ 0.53 $ 0.51 $ (0.02) -3.8% $ - Carry Out over 25feat $ 0.32 $ 0.31 $ (0.01) -3,1% 9 - Distance Drive in: Over 125' and less than 259' $ 1.82 $ 1.76 $ (0.06) -3.395. 9 - Distance Drive In. Over 259' and less than 1/10 mile $ 2.37 $ 2.28 $ (0.09) -3.895. 9 - Distance Drive In: Each 1/10 mile 0ver1110 mile. $ 3.53 $ 3.41 $ (0.12) -3.4% $ Roll out Charge, per 25 feel, Ferrari, per time $ 3.18 $ 2.38 $ j0.80) -25.2% $ - Drive In Charge per month $ 6.37 $ 7.61 $ 1.24 19.5% $ - Overweighl/Oversizecontainerperp/u $ 3.18 $ 3.88 $ 0.70 22.0% $ - Redelivery of one or more containers 9 $ 15.61 $ 17.58 $ 6.97 65.7% $ 68 Cart Cleaning $ 10.61 $ 12.53 $ 1.92 18.1% $ - Weekly Commercial Can and Cart One 20- allonGarbageCart - $ 13.40 0.0% $ - 1 35 -gallon Garbage Cart 348 $ 15.87 $ 15,93 $ 1.05 6.7% $ 3,800 1 45 -gallon Garbage Cart - $ 19.16 $ - 0.0% $ - 1 6A allon Garbage Cart 46 $ _22.40 $ 29.72 $ 7.32 32.7% $ 712 1 96 -gallon Garbage Cart 71 $ 28.68 $ 42.53 $ 13.85 48.3% $ 1,406 Extras (32 -gallon equivalent) 357 $ 4.26 5 (4.26) -100.0% 0 1,028 Weekly 98 -gallon Cart Yard Debris 23 $ 9.78 $ 11.07 S 1.29 13.2% $ 755 Extra Yard Debris (32 gallon) $ 3.18 $ 3.03 $ (0.15) -4.7% $ - Retum Trip $ 6.37 $1 13.86 $ 7.49 117.6% $ - Roll out Charge, per 25 feet, percart, per tirne $ 1.59 $ 3.88 $ {1.59) $ (0.14) $ (0.02) -100.0% -3.5% -3.8% - $ - $ $ - Oversize Container (per unit) $ 4,62 Carry Out 5 to 25 feet $ 0.53 $ 0.51 Carry Out over 25 feet $ 0.32 $ 0.31 $ (0.01) -3.1% $ - Distance Drive In: Over 125' and less than 250' ' 1.82 $ 1.76 $ mos) -3.3% $ - Distance Drive In- Over 250' and less than 1/10 mile $ 2.37 $ 2.28 $ (0.09) -3,8% $ - Distance Drive In: Each 1/10 mile over 1/10 mite. $ 3.53 $ 3.41 $ (0.12) -3.495 $ - Redelivery of Containers $ 10.61 $ 17,58 $ 6.97 65.7% $ - Cart Cleanirr$ $ 10.61 $ 12.53 $ 1.92 18.1% $ - Weekly Commercial 1 Cubic Yard Container, 1 pickup/EOW week $ 81.55 $ (61.55) -100.0% $ - 1 Cubic Yard Container, 1 pickupfweek $ 123.11 $ (123.11) -100.0% $ - Page 1 of 3 S (20,132) 5 173,215) 3 5 (8,300) $ 11,629 Admin Fee & Rate Modeling for the City of Spokane Valley 6% Street -wear Fee December 3, 2017 Disposal Rale per ton, not including Refuse Tax' $ 96.24 B.6 0 Tax Rate' (A) 1.5% (a+E-F) (0) (F-G=H) (H/0) (Ax Cx12) (AxEx12) Page 2 of 3 Service Level Customer Counts Adjusted VW Rates as of 411/2010 WITH New Admin Fee Current Rates AFTER the Disposal Change effective 12/1/2077 $ Difference of Adjusted Rates vs. 1211120/7 Rates Lower! (Higher) % Difference of Adjusted Rates us. 1211/2017 Rates Lower! (Higher) Total Annual Admin Fee Calculated Detachable Container (compacted) 1.5 cubic Yard Container, 1 pickup/EOW week $ _88.48 $ (88.48) -1000% 3 - 1.5 Cubic Yard Container, 1 pickup/week $ 176.95 $ (176.664 -100.0% $ - 2 Cubic Yard Container, 1 pickup/ECM weal/ $ 113.07 $ (113.07) -100.0% $ - 2 Cubic Yard Container, 1 piekupMeek 4 $ 226.13 $ 340.49 $ 114.36 50.6% $ 623 3 Cubic Yard Container, 1 pickup1EOW week $ 160.74 $ (160.74) -100.0% 8 3 Cubic Yard Container, 1 pickup/week 5 $ 321.47 $ 493.56 $ 172.09 53.5% $ 1,107 4 Cubic Yard Container, 1 pickup/EOW week $ 202.81 $ (202.81) -100.0% $ 4 Cubic Yard Container. 1 pickup/week 4 $ 405.69 $ 638.41 $ 232.81 57.4% $ 1,117 6 Cubic Yard Container, 1 pickup/EOW week $ 287.85 $ (287.88) -100.0% $ 8Cubic Yard Container, 1 pickup/week 3 4 575.74 $ 928.15 $ 352.41 61.2% $ 1,190 Commercial Detachable Container (loose) 1 Cubic Yard, 1 pickup/EOW week $ 33,25 $ 36.31 $ 3-06 9.2% $ - 1 Cubic Yard, 1 pickup/week 309 $ 85..50 $ 72.61 $ 6.11 9.2% $ 14,165 1 Cubic Yard, 2 pickups/week 18 $ 133.01 $ 138.32 $ 5.31 4.0% $ 1,650 1 Cubic Yard. 3 pickupslweek 1 $ 199.51 $ 205.03. $ 5.52 2.896 8 137 1 Cubic Yard, 4 pickupsh eek - $ 266.01 $ 271.24 $ 5.23 2.0% $ 1 Cubic Yard, 5 pickups/Week - $ 332.52 $ 337.45 5 4.93 1.5% $ - 15 Cubic Yard, 1 piokup/EOW week $ 46.53 $ 50.84 $ 4.31 9.3% 0 - 1.5 Cubic Yard. tpickuplweek 61 $ 93.05 $ 101.67 5 8.52 9.3% 3 3,909 1.5 Cubic Yard, 2 pickupsMeek 1 $ 186.11 $ 196.43 $ 10.32 5.5% $ 128 1.5 Cubic Yard, 3 pickups/week - $ 279.17 $ 291.19 $ 12.02 4.3% $ - 1.5 Cubic Yard, 4 plckupslweek - $ 372.23 $ 385.95 $ 13.72 3.7% $ - 1.5 Cubic Yard, 5 pickups/week - $ 465.28 $ 480.71 $ 15.43 3.3% $ - 2 Cubic Yard, 1 pickupIEOW week $ 57.77 63.17 $ 5.40 9.3% $ 2Cubic Yard, 1pickupslwack 298 $ 115.52 $ 126.33 $ 10.81 9.4% $ 23,709 2 Cubic Yard, 2 pickups/ eek 22 $ _ 231.06 $ 244.53 $ 13.47 5.8% $ 3.501 2 Cubic Yard, 3 pickupsM'eek 1 $ 346.60 $ 362.73 $ 16.13 4.7% $ 239 2 Cubic Yard, 4pickupslweek - 9 462.12 $ 48093 $ 1881 4.1% $ 2 Cubic Yard, 5 pic8opslweek - $ 577.85 $ 599.13 $ 21.48 3.7% $ - Commerclal Detachable Container (loose) 3 Cubic Yard, 1 pickup/EDW week $ 78.94 $ 86.42 $ 7.48 95% $ - 3 Cubic Yard, 1 pickup/week 131 $ 157.88 $ 172.83 8 14.95 9.5% S 14,242 3 Cubic Yard, 2 pickups/week 8 $ 315.77 $ 335.71 $ 19.94 6.3% 5 1,740 3 Cubic Yard. 3 pickupstweek - $ 473.66 $ 498.59 $ 24.93 5.3% $ - 3 Cubic Yard, 4 pickups/week - $ 631.54 $ 661.47 $ 29.93 4.7% 5 3 Cubic Yard, 5 pickups+week - $ 789.43 $ 824.35 $ 34.92 4.4% $ - 1 Cubic Yard, 1 pickuplEOW week 8 95.25 $ 104.41 5 9-16 95% 5 4 Cubic Yard, 1 pickup/week 262 $ 190.50 $ 208.82 $ 18.32 9.8% $ 34,395 4 Cubic Yard, 2 pickups/week 42 $ 381.90 $ 406.66 $ 25.66 6.714 $ 11.022 4 Cubic Yard, 3pickupslweek 8 $ 571.51 $ 604.50 $ 32.99 5.8% $ 2,150 4 Cubic Yard, 4 pickups/week - $ 762.01 $ 802 34 5 40 33 5.3% $ 4 Cubic Yard. 5pickupslweek - $ 952.52 $ 1,000.18. 5 47.66 5.0% $ - 6 Cubic Yard, 1 pickup/EOW week $ 128.66 $ 141.26 5 12.58 9.8% $ • 6 Cubic Yard, 1 pickup/week 256 $ 257.34 $ 282.51 0 25.17 9.8% $ 45,373 6 Cubic Yard, 2 pickupslweek 82 $ 514.69 $ 550.29 $ 35.60 8.9% $ 29.077 6 Cubic Yard, 3 pickups/week 11 $ 772.03 $ 818.07 $ 46.04 6.0% $ 5,850 6 Cubic Yard, 4 pic u}pslweek - $ 1,029.38 $ 1,085.85 $ 56.47 5.5% $ 6 Cubic Yard, 5 pickups/weak 1 $ 1,286.72 $ 1,353.63 $ 96.91 5.2% 3 886 8 Cubic Yard, 1 pickup/EDW week 5 154.38 $ 169.79 $ 15.41 10.0% 5 0 Cubic Yard. 1 pickup/week 178 $ 308.79 $ 339.57. $ 30.78 10.0% $ 37,871 Page 2 of 3 Admin Fee & Rate Modeling for the City of Spokane Valley 6% Street -wear Fee December 1, 2017 Disposal Rate per ton, not including Refuse Tax' $ 90.24 R&OTax Rate. (A) 1-5% (D+E=F) (G} (F-G=H) (HID) (AYC*12) (RxE i2) Total Service Fee Revenue Shift $ 700,069 $ 125 009e 3 013 Service Level Customer COl1Elty Adjusted WM Rates as of 414!2018 WITH New Admin Fee Current Rates AFTER the 01990551 Change effective 1211!2017 $ Difference of Adjusted Rates vs. 12/112017 Rates lower( {Higher) 93 Difforenco of Adjusted Rates vs. 121172017 Rates Loweri {Higher) Total Annual Admin Fee Calculated 6 Cubic Yard, 2 pidwpslweek 00 $ 617.58 $ 660.52 $ 42.94 7.0% $ 25,524 8 Cubic Yard, 3 pickupshveek 17 $ 926-37 $ 981.47 $ 55.10 5.9% $ 10,846 8 Cubic Yard, 4 pickups/week 1 $ 1,235.16 $ 1,302.37 9 67.26 5.4% $ 851 8 Cubic Yard, 5 pid to ek 5 $ 1,543 96 $ 1,623 37 $ 79.41 5.1% $ 5,318 Extra loose orbic yard in container, per pickup 101 $ 10.73 $ 18.57 $ 7.84 73.T% $ 751 Extra loose cubic yard en ground, per pickup 361 $ 21.33 $ 18.57 $ {2.76) -12.9% $ 5,290 Multifamily Recycling Fee (per cubic yard per pickup) 312 $ 1.37 $ 26.81 $ 1.12 $ 25.86 $ {0.25) $ (0.95) -18.2% -3.5% $ 300 $ - Compactor Connect/Disconneet Service Gate Service 35 $ 12.55 3 12.11 $ (0.44) -3.5°k $ 299 Lock/Unlock Service 45 $. 12.55 $ 12.29 $ (0.35) -2.895 $ 397 Roll 001 Fees 5 $ 2.47 $ 2.36 $ (0.09) -3.6% $ R Roll Out Fees Each Additional 5 ft over25 ft. $ 0.58 $ 0.56 $ (0.02) -3.495 $ - Stand-by Time $ 1.70 $ (1 709 4000% $ - Container Meaning $ 10.61 $ 12.53 3 1.92 18.1% S Redi€ivery of Containers $ 21.22 $ 2927 $ 8.05 37.9% 5 Return Trip $ 10.61 $ 13.86 $ 3.25 30.6% $ - Temporary Collection Hauling 2 Yard detachable Container, per pick up $ 30.41 $ 40.72 $ 10.31 33.9% $ - 4 Yard detachable container, per pick up $ 49.13 $ 59.09 $ 9.96 20.3% S 6Yard detachable container, per pick up $ 65.49 $ 75.25 $ 9.76 14.9% 5 - 8 Yard detachable container, per pick up $ 77.45 $ 87.53 $ 10.08 13.0% $ - Temporary Collection Container Rental and Delivery 2 Yard detachable Contalner, daily $ 1.46 $ 1.34 $ {0.12) -8.2% $ 4 Yard detachable container, daily $ 2.38 6 2.18 $ (0.20) -8.4% $ - &Yard detachable container, daily $ 2.60 $ 2.38. $ (0.22) -8.5% $ - &Yard detachable container, daily $ 3-15 $ 2.95 $ (0.25) -7.9% $ Delivery Fee $ 54.67 $ 45.71 $ (8.96) -16.4% $ - Event Service Delivery, provision, collection, set of 2 carts, garbage and recycling $ 26.52 0.0% $ - Hourly Rates RaarlSide-l❑ad packer +driver $ 79.59 $ 79.59 $ 70.74 $ 70.74 $ (8.85) $ (8.85) -11.1% -11.1% $ $ Frentdoadpacker +driver Drop Box Truck 4 Driver $ 79.59 $ 70.74 $ (8.35) -11.195 3 Additional Labor $ 79.59 $ 70.74 5 (8.95). -11.195 5 Total Service Fee Revenue Shift $ 700,069 $ 125 009e 3 013 Admin Fee & Rate Modeling for the City of Spokane Valley 12.5% Street -wear Fee Deoomber 1, 2017 Disposal Rate per ton, not including Refuse Tax= E 98.24 13 & 0 Tax Rate: 13% (A) (D*E=F) (0) (F-G=H) (14/D) (AxCx12) (AxEx12) Pagel of Service Level Customer Counts Adjusted MA Rates as of 4/1/2018 WITH Now Admin Fee Current Rates AFTER the Disposal Changs effective 12/1/2017 $ Difference of Adjusted Rates vs. 122112017 Rates Lower/ IHigher) % Difference of Adjusted Rates vs. 1211/2017 Rates Lower/ (Higher) Total Annual Admin Foe Calculated Monthly" One 35 gallon Garbage Cart 259. 3 12.64 $ 12.64 $ - 0.0% $ 5,100 Weekly= Residential Curbside Garbage Service :lodes Recycli One 10/13 gallon Micro-Can/Cart $ 16.09 $ 15,09 $ - 0.0% $ - One 20 -gallon Garbage Cart 1,756 $ 16.05 $ 16.05 $ - 0.0% $ 49689 135 -gallon Garbage Cart 12,711 3 19.19 $ 19.19 $ - 0.0% 6 338,621 1 45 -gallon Garbage Cart - $ 23.15 0.0% $ - 1 64 -gallon Garbage Cart 6,562 $ 26.53 $ 2633 $ - 0.0% $ 236,232 1 96 -gallon Garbage Cart 1,762 $ 33.86 $ 33.85 $ - 0.0% $ 79,290 Additional 35 Gallon Carts (weekly svo) - $ 6-34 0.0% $ - Extras (32 gallon equivalent) 1,006 $ 4.53 $ 3.67 $ (6.86) -19.0% $ 6,157 Yard Debris Curbside Service Subscription Yard Debris Service - 20 -gallon Cart - $ 7.61 0.0% 9 - Subscription Yard Debris Service - 32-35 gallon Cart - $ 5.17 0.0% $ - Subscrliptiion Yard Debris Service - 64 -gallon Cart - $ 9.57 0.0% $ - Subscription Yard Debris - 98 -gallon Cart 10.395 $ 11.16 $ 11.07 $ (0.139) -0.9% $ 145.946 Extra Yarm Debris (32 gallon) 132 -5 3.38 $ 3.03 $ (0.35) -10.4% $ 6/11 Additional Yard Debris Cart - Any Size - $ 6.76 $ 535 $ (1.41) -20.9°% $ - Miscellaneous Fees Return Trip 25 $ 6.76 $ 8.69 $ 1.93 28.6% $ 226 Recycling Only (No Garbage Service) $ 9.74 $ 5.68 $ (4.06) -41.7% $ - Additional Recycling Cart $ 1.97 $ (1.97) -1070.0% $ - Oversize Container (per unit) $ 4.27 $ 3.88 $ (0.39) -9.1% $ - Carry Out 5 to 25 feat $ 0.56 $ 0.51 $ (0.05) -8.9% $ - Carry Out over 25 feet $ 0.34 $ 5.31 $ (0.03} -3.8% 9 - Distance Dnve In: Over 125' and less than 250' $ 1.94 $ 1.76 $ (6.18) -9.3% $ Distance Drive In: Over250' and less than 1/19 mile $ 2.51 $ 2.28 $ (0.23) -9.2% $ Distance Drive In: Each 1/10 mile over 1/10mile. $ 3.75 $ 3.41 $ (0.34) -9.1% $ - Roll out Charge. per 25 feet permit tier time $ 3.38 $ 2.38 5 (1.00) -29.6% $ - Drive In Charge per month $ 6.76 $ 7.51 5 0.85 12.6% $ - Overweight/Oversize container per p/u $ 3.38 $ 3.88 $ 0,50 14.8% - $ - Redelivery of one or more containers 9 $ 11.27 $ 17.58 $ 6.31 56.6% $ 141 Cart Cleaning $ 11.27 $ 12.53 $ 1.26 11.2% $ - Weekly Commercial Can and Cart One 20 -gallon Garbage Cad - $ 14.23 0.0% $ - 1 35 -gallon Garbage Can 348 .3 16.86 $ 16.93 $ 0.07 0.4% 9 7,934 1 45gaiion Garbage Gad - $ 20.35 $ - 0.0% $ - 1 64 -gallon Garbage Cart 46 $ 23.79 $ 29.72 $ 5.93 24.9% $ 1.479 1 66 -gallon Garbage Cart 71 $ 30.46 $ 42.53 $ 12.07 39.6% $ 2,822 Extras (32-gaklon equivalent) 357 $ 4.53 $ (4.53) -100.0% $ 2,185 Weekly 9B -gallon Cart Yard Debris 23 $ 10.39 3 i 1.07 $ 0.68 6.5% $ 323 Extra Yard Debris (32 gallon) $ 3.38 $ 3.03 3 (0.35) -10.4% $ - Return Trip $ 6.76 $ 13.86 $ 7.10 105.0% $ - Roll out Charge, per 25 feet, percart, per time 0 1.69 $ (1.69) -100.0% S Oversize Container (per unit) $ 4.27 $ 3.88 $ 0.51 $ (0.39) $ (0.05) -9.1% -8.9% 5 - $ - Carry Out 5 to 25 feel $ 0.56 Carry Out over 25 feet $ 0.34 $ 0.31 $ (0.03) -8.8% $ - Distance Drive In: Over 925' and fess than 250' $ 1.94 $ 1.76 $ (0.18) -9.3% $ - Distance Drive In: Over 250' and less than 1/10 retie $ 2.51 $ 2.28 $ (0.231 -9.2% $ - Distance Drive tn: Each 1/10 mile over 1/10 mile. $ 3.75 $ 3.41 $ (0.34) -9.1% 3 Redelivery of Containers $ 11.27 $ 17.58 $ 6.31 56.0% $ Carl Cleaning $ 11.27 $ 12.53 $ 1.26 11.210 $ - Weekly Commercfal 1 Cubic Yard Container, 1 pickup/E©W week $ 65.38 $ (65.38) -1010% $ - 1 Cubic Yard Container, 1 pickupnveek $ 130.76 $ (130.76) -100.0% $ - Pagel of Admin Fee & Rate Modeling for the City of Spokane Valley 12.5% Street -wear Fee December 1, 2017 Disposal Rate per ton, not including Refuse Tax: $ 99.24 B & O Tax Rate i.5"i (A) (p+E=F) (0) (F-G=ff) (H/0) (AxC x12) (AxEx12) Page 2 of 3 Service Level CustomerRates Counts Adjusted WM as of 411/2019 WITH New Adm in Current Rates AFTER the pisposaf Cha a Chan g°.ve effectFee 12/1/2017 $ Difference of Adjusted Rates vs. 12/112017 Rates Lower/ (Higher) % Difference of Adjusted Rates vs. 12/1/7017 Rates Lower/ (Higher) Total Annual Admin Fee Calculated Detachable Container (compacted) 1.5 Cubic Yard Container, 1 pickup/EOW week $ 93.98 $ (93.98) -100.0% $ - 1.5 Gubic Yard Container. 1 pickup/week $ 187.96 $ (187.96) -100.0% $ - 2 Cubic Yard Container, 1 pickup/EOW week $ 120.10 $ (1200.10) -100.0% 9 - 2 Cubic Yard Container, 1 pickup/week 4 $ 240-19 $ 340_49 $ 100.30 41.8% $ 1,298 3 Cubic Yard Container, 1 pickup/EOW week $ 170.73 $ (170,73) -100.0% S - 3 Cubic Yard Container, 1 pickup/week 5 $ 341,47 $ 493.56 $ 152.09 44.5% 5 2,307 4 Cubic Yard Container, 1 pickup/EOW week $ 21542 $ (215.42) -100.0% $ - 4 Cubic Yard Container, 1 pickup/week 4 $ 430.83 $ 638.41 $ 207.58 48.2% $ 2,320 6 Cubic Yard Container, 1 pickup/EOW week $ 305.78 $ (305.76) -100.0% $ - 6 Cubic Yard Container, 1 pickup! eek 3 $ 611.54 $ 928.15 5 316.61 51.6% $ 2,479 Commercial Detachable Container (loose) 1 Cubic Yard, 1 pickup/EOW week $ 35.32 $ 36.31 $ 0.99 2.8% $ - 1 Cubic Yard, 1 pickup/week 309 $ 70.63 $ 72.61 9 1.98 2.8% $ 29479 1 Cubic Yard. 2pickupslweek 18 $ 141.28 $ 138.32 $ (2.96) -2.1% $ 3,437 1 Cubic Yard, 3 pickups/week 1 $ 211.92 $ 205.03 $ (6.89) -3.3% $ 286 1 Cubic Yard, 4 pickups/week - $ 282.55 $ 271.24 $ (11.31) -4.0% $ - 1 Cubic Yard, 5 pickupslweek - $ 353.20 $ 337_46 $ (15 75) -4.5% $ - 1.5 Cubic Yard, 1 pidkupJEOW week $ 49,42 $ 59.84 $ 1.42 2.9% $ - 1.5 Cubic Yard, 1 pickup/week 61 $ 98.84 $ 101.67 $ 2.83 2.9% $ 8,147 1.5 Cubic Yard, 2 pickups/week 1 $ 197.69 $ 196.43 $ (1.26) -9.6% 0 267 1.5 Cubic Yard, 3 pickups/week - $ 295.53 $ 291.19 $ (5.34) -1.8% $ - 1.5 Cubic Yard, 4 pickups/week - $ 395.38 $ 385.95 $ 480.71 $ (9.43) $ (13.50) -2.4% -2.7% $ - $ - 1.5 Cubic Yard, 5 pickups/week - $ 494.21 2 Cubic Yard, 1 pickup/EOW week $ 61.36 63.17 $126.33 $ 1.91 2.9 .6 $ - 2 Cubic Yard, 1 pickups/week 298 $ 122.71 $ 3.62 3.0% $ 49,420 2 Cubic Yard, 2 pickupsNreek 22 $ 245.43 $ 244.53 $ {0.90) $ {5.42) -0.4°% -1.5% $ 7,294 $ 497 2 Guhic Yard, 3 pickupslweek 1 $ 368.16 $ 362.73 2 Cubic Yard, 4 pickupsMmek - $ 490.86 $ 480.93 $ {9.93) -2.0% $ - 2 Cubic Yard, 5 pickups/week - $ 613.57 $ 599.13 $ (14.44) -2.4% $ - Commercial Detachable Container (loose) 3 Cubic Yard, 1 pickup/ECM/ week $ 83.85 $ 6.6.42 $ 2.57 3.1% $ - 3 Cubic Yard, 1 pickup/week 131 $ 167.70 $ 172.83 $ 5.13 3.1% $ 29,079 3Cubic Yard, 2pickups/week 8 $ 335.40 $ 335.71 $ 0.31 0.1% $ 3,625. 3 Cubic Yard, 3 pickups/week - $ 503.12 $ 498.59 $ (4.53) -0.9% $ - 3 Cubic Yard, 4 pickups/Week - $ 670.82 $ 661.47 $ (8.35) $ (14.17) -1.4% -1.7% $. - $ - 3 Cubic. Yard, 5 pickups/week - _ $ 838.52 $ 824.35 4 Cubic Yard, 1 pickup/EOW week $ 101.17 $ 104A1 $ 3.24 3.2% $ - 4 Cubic Yard, 1 pickup/week 262 $ 202.34 $ 208.82 $ 6.48 3.2% $ 71,620 4 Cubic Yard, 2 pidcupsfweek 42 $ 404.69 $ 406.66 $ 1.97 0.556 $ 22,962 4 Cubic Yard, 3 pickups/week 6 $ 607.05 $ 604.50 $ (2.55) -0.4% $ 6,562 4 Cubic Yard, 4 pickups/week - 0 809.40 $ 802.34 $ 1,000.18 $ (7.06) $ (11.57) -0.9% -1.156 $ - $ - 4 Cubic Yard, 5 pickups/week - $ 1,011.75 6 Cubic Yard. 1 pickup/EOW week $ 136.68 $ 141.20 $ 4,58 3.4% $ - 6 Cubic Yard, 1 pickup/week 256 $ 273.35 $ 282.51 $ 9.16 3.4% $ 94,556 6 Cubic Yard, 2 pickups/week 82 $ 546.69 $ 550.29 5 3.60 0.7% $ 60,565 6 Cubic Yard, 3 pickups/week 11 $ 820.04 $ 818.07 S (1.97) -0.2% 9 12,186 6 Cubic Yard, 4 pidcupsfweok - $ 1,093.40 $ 1,085.85 5 (7.50) -0.7% S - 6 Cubic Yard, 5 pickups/week 1 $ 1,365.74 $ 1,353.63 $ (13.11) -1.0% S 1847 8 Cubic Yard, 1 pickup/ECM week $ 183.98 $ 189.79 $ 5.81 3.5% 5 - 8 Cubic Yard, 1 pickup/week 178 $ 327.99 $ 339.57 $ 11.58 3.5% 9 78,882 Page 2 of 3 Admin Fee & Rate Modeling for the City of Spokane Valley 12.5% Street -wear Fee December 1, 2017 Disposal Rate per tan, not including Refuse Tax- $ 98 24 6 & 0 Tax Rate: 1.5% (A) (Dse=F) (0) (F-c3=H) (HID) Cx12) (Ax&,r12) Total 5 1,460,878 Page 3 of 3 Service Fee Revenue Shift 315 Service Level Customer Counts Adjusted WM Rates as of 411/2018 WITH New Admin Fee Currant Rates AFTER the Disposal Change effective 12/1/2017 5 Difference of Adjusted Rates vs. 12/112617 Rates Lower! (Higher) % Difference of Adjusted Rates vs- 1211/2017 Rates Lower! (Higher) Total Annual Admin Fee Calculated 6 Cubic Yard, 2 pidwpslweek. 60 $ 655.99 $ 60052 $ 4.53 0.7% $ 53,179 8 Cubic Yard, 3 pickups/week 17 $ 083.98 $ 981.47 $ (2.51) -0.3% $ 22,861 8 Cubic Yard, 4 pickups/week 1 $ 1,311.98 $ 1,302.37 $ (9.61) -0-7% $ 1.773 8 Cubic Yana, 5 pickups/week 5 $ 1,639.97 5 1,623.37 5 (16.60) -1-0% $ 11,078 Extra loose cubic yard in container, per pickup 141 $ 11.39 $ 18.57 $ 7.18 63.0% $ 1.551 Extra loose cubic. yard on ground, per pickup 361 5 22.66 $ 18.57 $ (4.Q $ (0.33) -18-0% -22-8% $ 11,057 $ 599 Multifamily Recycling Fee (per cubic yard per pickup) 312 5 1.45 $ 1.12 Compactor ConnethDisconned Service $ 28.48 5 25.86 $ (2.62) -9.2% $ - Gate. Service 35 $ 13.33 $ 12.11 $ (1.22) -9.2% $ 623 LocklLlnlock Service 46 $ 13.33 $ 12.20 $ (1.13) -5.5% $ 827 Roll Out Fees 5 $ 2.63 $ 2.38 $ (0.25) -5-51/4 9 1 n Roll Out Fees Each Additional 5 ft over 25 11. $ 0.62 $ 0.56 $ (0.061 -9-7% $ - Stand-by Time $ 180 $ (1_80) -1000% $ - Container Cleaning $ 11.27 $ 12.53 $ 1.26 11.2% $ Redilivery of Containers $ 22.54 $ 29.27 $ 6.73 29.9% $ - Return Trip $ 11.27 $ 13.86 $ 2.59 23.0% $ - Temporary Collection Hauling 2 Yard detachable Container, per pickup $ 32.30 $ 52.19 $ 40.72 $ 59.09 $ 8.42 9 6.90 26.190 13.259 Si - 5 - 4 Yard detachable container, per pick up 6 Yard detachable container, per pick up $ 69.55 $ 75.25 $ 5.69 8.2% 5 - 8 Yard detachable container, per pick up 5 82.25 $ 87.53 $ 5.27 6,455 S - Temporary Collection Container Rental and Delivery 2 Yard detachable Container, daily $ 1.55 9 1.34 S (0.22) -14.1% $ 4 Yard detachable container, daily $ 2.62 5 2.18 5 (0.34) -135% 5 - 6Yard detachable sontainer, dally $ 2.76 $ 2.38 5 (0.38) -13.8% $ 8 Yard detachable container, daily $ 3.35 $ 2.90 $ (0.45) -13.4% $ Delivery Fee $ 58.07 $ 45.71 $ (12.36) -21.3k $ - Event Service Delivery, provision, collection, set of 2 carts, garbage and recycling $ 28.17 0-0% $ - Hourly Rates RearlSide4oad packer +driver $ 84.54 $ 70.74 $ (13.80) -16.3% $ - Front -load packer 1- driVSi' $ 84.54 $ 7074 $ (13.80) -16.3% $ - Drop Box Truck + Driver $ 84.54 $ 70.74 $ (13.85) -16.3% $ - Additional Labor 5 84.54 $ 76.74 $ (13,80) -16.3% $ - Total 5 1,460,878 Page 3 of 3 Service Fee Revenue Shift 315 To: From: Re: DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA as of January 4, 2018; 10:30 a.m. Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative Council & Staff City Clerk, by direction of City Manager Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings January 16, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue, Jan 91 ACTION ITEMS: 1. Second Reading Ordinance 18-001 Regarding Nuisances — Cary Driskell, Erik Lamb (15 minutes) 2. Second Reading Ordinance 18-002 Regarding Unfit Dwellings — Cary Driskell, Erik Lamb (15 minutes) 3. Motion Consideration: Bid Award Appleway Trail Project, Sullivan to Corbin — Lochmiller/Mantz (10 min) NON -ACTION ITEMS: 4. Water Banking — Henry Allen, and Mike Hermanson, Spokane County (15 minutes) 5. Annexation — Erik Lamb, Mike Basinger, Chaz Bates (20 minutes) 6. Advance Agenda — Mayor (5 minutes) 7. Information only: TIP Amendment [*estimated meeting: 80 minutes] January 23, 2018, meeting cancelled Councilmembers attend AWC City Action Days (Jan 24-25), Olympia January 30, 2018, Study Session (w/action items) 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Admin Report: Barker Grade Separation Project Update — Gloria Mantz, Bill Helbig 3. Admin Report: Spokane Housing Authority Re -Authorization — Erik Lamb 4. Advance Agenda — Mayor 5. Info Only: Dept Reports [due Tue, Jan 23] (5 minutes) (20 minutes) (15 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 45 minutes] February 6, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue, Jan 30 ACTION ITEMS: 1. First Reading Proposed Ordinance Amending Street Standards — Henry Allen, Micki Harnois 2. Motion Consideration: Barker Grade Separation Contract — Gloria Mantz, Bill Helbig NON -ACTION ITEMS: 3. Proposed Amended TIP — Colin Quinn -Hurst 4. Functional Classification of Streets - Colin Quinn -Hurst 5. Advance Agenda (25 minutes) (20 minutes) (15 minutes) (20 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 85 minutes] February 13, 2018, Special Meeting, Winter Workshop, 8:30 a.m. — 3:00 p.m. [due Tue, Feb 6] Tentative agenda items include: Outside Agency Funding Level February 20, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda 2. Info Only: Potential Grant Opportunities (FMSIB and CSP) [due Tue, Feb 13] (5 minutes) February 27, 2018, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue, Feb 201 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed Amended 2018 TIP — Colin Quinn -Hurst (15 minutes) la. Proposed Resolution Amending 2018 TIP 2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes) 3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance Amending Street Standards — Henry Allen, Micki Harnois (15 min) 4. Admin Report: Potential Grant Opportunities (FMSIB and CSP) — Adam Jackson (20 minutes) 5. Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 6. Info Only: (a)Dept Reports; (b) Potential grant Opps (SRTC, SRTS, PBS) [*estimated meeting: 55 mins] Draft Advance Agenda 1/4/2018 11:52:24 AM Page 1 of 2 March 6, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. Accomplishments Report (2017) 2. Advance Agenda [due Tue, Feb 27] (— 60 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 65 mins] March 13, 2018, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue Mar 6] 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Motion Consideration: Potential Grant Opportunities (FMSIB and CSP) — Adam Jackson (20 minutes) 3. Admin Report: Potential Grant Opportunities (SRTC, SRTS, PBS) — Adam Jackson (20 minutes) 4. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 50 mins] March 20, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda [due Tue Mar 13] (5 minutes) March 27, 2018, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. Idue Tue Mar 20] 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Motion Consideration: Potential Grant Opportunities (SRTC, SRTS, PBS) — Adam Jackson 3. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) April 3, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. April 10, 2018, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) April 17, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. April 24, 2018, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) May 1, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. *time for public or Council comments not included OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: Donation Recognition Governance Manual Police Dept Quarterly Rpt (April, July, Oct, Jan) Police Precinct Lease Renewal (Nov '18) Retail Recruitment Follow-up Sign Ordinance Street Illumination (ownership, cost, location) Tobacco 21 Resolution Transportation & Infrastructure Utility Facilities in ROW [due Tue Mar 27] [due Tue April 3] (5 minutes) [due Tue April 10] [due Tue April 17] (5 minutes) [due Tue April 24] Draft Advance Agenda 1/4/2018 11:52:24 AM Page 2 of 2