2018, 02-20 Study SessionAGENDA
SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
STUDY SESSION FORMAT
(with some action items)
Tuesday, February 20, 2018
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
10210 E Sprague Avenue
(Please Silence Your Cell Phones During the Meeting)
6:00 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
ACTION ITEMS:
1. First Reading Proposed Ordinance 18-005, Spokane Housing Authority Reauthorization- Erik Lamb
[public comment]
2. Mayoral Appointment: Councilmember to Board of Health — Mayor Higgins [public comment]
DISCUSSION LEADER
SUBJECT/ACTIVITY
GOAL
NON -ACTION ITEMS:
3. Henry Allen, Deanna Horton, and Saltese Floodplain Update
Spokane County Water
Reclamation Engineer Ben Brattebo
4. Mike Basinger,
Colin Quinn -Hurst
5. Erica Amsden, Gloria Mantz
6. Gloria Mantz, Rob Lochmiller
7. Morgan Koudelka,
John Pietro
8. Mayor Higgins
9. Mayor Higgins
10. Mark Calhoun
ADJOURN
Functional Classification of
City Streets
Sprague Avenue Preservation Project:
Sullivan to Corbin
Wellesley Sidewalk Project Update
False Alarm Code Amendment
Advance Agenda
Council Check in
City Manager Comments
Discussion/Information
Discussion/Information
Discussion/Information
Discussion/Information
Discussion/Information
Discussion/Information
Discussion/Information
Discussion/Information
Study Session Agenda, February 20, 2018 Page 1 of 1
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: February 20, 2018 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ['consent ❑ old business ® new business ['public hearing
['information ❑admin. report ['pending legislation ['executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First reading of proposed Ordinance No. 18-005 reauthorizing the joint
Spokane Housing Authority.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Chapter 35.82; Resolution 03-047.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adoption of Resolution 03-047 authorizing creation of
joint Spokane Housing Authority. Council heard an administrative report on February 6, 2018.
BACKGROUND: The Spokane Housing Authority (the "Authority") is a joint housing authority
established pursuant to chapter 35.82 RCW to provide affordable housing opportunities within the
entire Spokane County region, including within the boundaries of the City of Spokane Valley
(City). The Authority was initially created in in 1971 within the City of Spokane, and was expanded
in 2001 to include the entire County. After incorporation, the City adopted Resolution 03-047
establishing the Authority as a joint housing authority within the City limits.
The Authority has worked since establishment to provide safe, sanitary, and affordable housing
opportunities to low -to -moderate income and senior citizens. It operates a number of affordable
housing facilities and provides other types of assistance as well. The Authority operates
independently from the City and no City funds or staff are used in Authority business. However,
the City appoints two members to represent the City on the Authority commission. The City's
current representatives are Gretchen Campbell and Keith James.
Recently, the Authority determined that a number of the specific requirements set forth in the
original authorizing documents, including Resolution 03-047, were burdensome and inflexible.
These included specific designation of personnel, meeting times, and other operational
requirements. These requirements make it difficult for the Authority to conduct its business in the
most efficient manner. Accordingly, the Authority approached the City, Spokane County, and the
City of Spokane to request that each re-establish the Authority and to allow more operational
flexibility with things such as meeting times and specific personnel that are required to run the
Authority.
Staff from the Authority, the City, Spokane County, and the City of Spokane have worked to draft
an appropriate Ordinance for each jurisdiction to adopt to re-establish the Authority with the
flexibility it desires. The proposed Ordinance maintains the same mission and goals for the
Authority and the Authority will continue to provide the same type and level of service and
opportunities that it has provided historically.
Staff from the Authority have included a more detailed memo regarding the proposed changes.
During the administrative report, staff from the Authority provided an update on the proposed
Ordinance as well as Authority operations.
OPTIONS: Move to advance to a second reading, with or without further amendments.
Page 1 of 2
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to advance Ordinance No. 18-005 reauthorizing
the joint Spokane Housing Authority to a second reading.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A.
STAFF CONTACT: Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney.
ATTACHMENTS: (1) Proposed Ordinance No. 18-005; (2) Memo from SHA; (3) Spokane Valley
Resolution 03-047
Page 2 of 2
DRAFT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 18-005
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, CONFIRMING THE FORMATION OF THE SPOKANE HOUSING
AUTHORITY AS A JOINT HOUSING AUTHORITY; PROVIDING FOR MATTERS REQUIRED
PURSUANT TO RCW 35.82.300; REPEALING CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS; AND OTHER
MATTERS RELATING THERETO.
WHEREAS, the Washington Legislature, by enactment of Chapter 23, Section 4, of the Laws of
1939, as amended (currently codified as RCW 35.82.030), created in each city and in each county of the
State a public body corporate and politic a housing authority of such city or county, as applicable. Such
statute further provides that no such authority shall transact any business or exercise its powers under
chapter 35.82 RCW until or unless the governing body of the city or the county, as the case may be, declares
by resolution that there is need for an authority to function in such city or county. Pursuant to a resolution
adopted by its City Council on December 13, 1971, the City of Spokane (Spokane) declared a need for a
housing authority to function within Spokane, and named such housing authority as the "Housing Authority
of the City of Spokane;" and
WHEREAS, there are unsanitary and unsafe inhabited dwellings located in the incorporated cities
and towns within Spokane County (County), and in the unincorporated area of the County, as well as a
shortage of safe and sanitary dwelling accommodations available at rents affordable to persons of low to
moderate income and to senior citizens. These conditions constitute a threat to the health, safety and welfare
of the residents of the County. It appears likely that substandard housing conditions cannot entirely be
relieved by the private sector; and
WHEREAS, RCW 35.82.300 authorizes cities and counties to form joint housing authorities. To
do so, the legislative authorities of one or more counties and the legislative authorities of any city or cities
within any of those counties or in another county or counties must authorize the joint housing authority by
ordinance, which ordinance is required to prescribe: (1) the number of commissioners of the joint housing
authority, (2) the method for their appointment, (3) the length of their terms, (4) the method for their
removal; (5) the election of officers of the joint housing authority; (6) the allocation of all costs of the joint
housing authority; and (7) any other matters necessary for the operation of the joint housing authority; and
WHEREAS RCW 35.82.300(4) provides that a "joint housing authority shall have all the powers
as prescribed by [chapter 35.82 RCW] for any housing authority" and that "[t]he area of operation of a joint
housing authority shall be the combined areas, defined by RCW 35.82.020(6), of the housing authorities
created in each city and county authorizing the joint housing authority;" and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 01-83, adopted by the Spokane City Council on September
24, 2001, and Resolution No. 1-0752, adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on August 14, 2001,
Spokane and the County authorized the formation of the "Spokane Housing Authority" (Authority) as a
joint housing authority within the boundaries of Spokane and the unincorporated portions of the County.
Pursuant to Resolution No. 03-047, adopted by the Spokane Valley City Council on September 23, 2003,
the City of Spokane Valley (City) authorized the formation of the Authority as a joint housing authority
within the boundaries of the City. The Board of County Commissioners and the Spokane City Council
have further adopted resolutions delegating to the Spokane Valley Mayor the authority to appoint two of
the Authority's commissioners, and increasing the number of Authority commissioners from five to six;
and
WHEREAS, the Spokane City Council, City of Spokane Valley City Council, and Board of County
Commissioners have determined there remains a continuing need for a housing authority within the
Ordinance 18-005 SHA Page 1 of 5
DRAFT
Spokane region. There exists a need to update the ordinances and resolutions authorizing the formation of
the Authority to provide for the efficient governance of the Authority and to allow expansion of the
Authority to areas not currently served by the Authority; and
WHEREAS, the City Council hereby declares there remains a continuing need for a housing
authority to function in the City, and hereby reaffirms each and every previous declaration of such need by
the City Council. The City Council hereby determines it is necessary and desirable to adopt an updated
ordinance to provide for the efficient governance of the Authority and to allow expansion to areas outside
of the City, Spokane, and unincorporated areas of the County.
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County,
Washington, ordains as follows:
Section 1. Finding of Necessity. Upon review of the information before it and in consideration of material
provided to it, the City Council of the City makes the following determinations:
A. The City Council hereby adopts the recitals set forth in this Ordinance;
B. Access to safe, secure, and affordable housing is important to the residents of the City, Spokane,
and the County, collectively "the Community;"
C. Access to this type of housing is increasingly difficult to many residents of the Community; and
D. The Spokane Housing Authority (the "Authority"), with support from the Community, has
successfully undertaken many initiatives to provide more housing opportunities, but there is still an unmet
need that can best be addressed by the collective approach of the Community.
Section 2. Authorization of Authority. A joint housing authority (within the meaning of RCW 35.82.300),
to be known as "Spokane Housing Authority," is authorized by the City Council to be formed within the
boundaries of the City.
Section 3. Commissioners. The powers of the Authority are hereby vested in the Authority's commissioners
in office from time to time. The commissioners in office from time to time shall be referred to as the
Authority's "Board of Commissioners" (the Board).
A. Number. The number of commissioners of the Authority shall be seven. Upon formation, one
of the Authority's commissioners shall be designated as the "Assisted Commissioner", two of the
Authority's commissioners shall be designated as the "Spokane Commissioners", two of the Authority's
commissioners shall be designated as the "Spokane Valley Commissioners," and two of the Authority's
commissioners shall be designated as the "County Commissioners."
B. Method for Appointment. The Authority's commissioners shall be appointed and re -appointed
in the following manner
1. Assisted Commissioner. The Assisted Commissioner shall be an individual who is
directly assisted by the Authority (e.g. a resident of a housing project owned by the Authority, a
recipient of Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher administered by the Authority) at the time such
individual is appointed as the Assisted Commissioner. The Assisted Commissioner shall be
appointed by the Authority's Board. Such appointment shall be evidenced by a resolution of the
Board, which resolution shall be retained by the Authority's Executive Director (as defined herein).
Such resolution shall be conclusive evidence of the due and proper appointment of the Assisted
Commissioner.
2. Spokane Commissioners. Each Spokane Commissioner shall be an individual who, at
the time such individual is appointed or re -appointed as a Spokane Commissioner, is a resident of
Spokane Each Spokane Commissioner shall be appointed by the Mayor of Spokane and confirmed
by the Spokane City Council. Such appointment shall be evidenced in writing by the Mayor and
Ordinance 18-005 SHA Page 2 of 5
DRAFT
the Spokane City Council (or by the Spokane City Clerk reflecting action by the Spokane City
Council), and transmitted to the Authority's Executive Director. Such writing(s) shall be
conclusive evidence of the due and proper appointment of the Spokane Commissioner to which the
writing pertains.
3. Spokane Valley Commissioners. Each Spokane Valley Commissioner shall be an
individual who, at the time such individual is appointed or re -appointed as a Spokane Valley
Commissioner, is a resident of Spokane Valley. Each Spokane Valley Commissioner shall be
appointed by the Mayor of Spokane Valley and confirmed by the Spokane Valley City Council.
Such appointment shall be evidenced in writing by the Mayor and the Spokane Valley City Council
(or by the Spokane Valley City Clerk reflecting action by the Spokane Valley City Council) and
transmitted to the Authority's Executive Director. Such writing(s) shall be conclusive evidence of
the due and proper appointment of the Spokane Valley Commissioner to which the writing pertains.
4. County Commissioner. Each Spokane County Commissioner shall be an individual
who, at the time such individual is appointed or re -appointed as the County Commissioner, is a
resident of Spokane County (regardless of whether such individual resides in an incorporated city
or town or in the unincorporated area of the County; however, they may not reside inside the City
of Spokane or the City of Spokane Valley city limits). The County Commissioners shall be
appointed by the Board of County Commissioners. Such appointment shall be evidenced in writing
by the Board of County Commissioners (or by the Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners
reflecting action by the Board of County Commissioners) and transmitted to the Authority's
Executive Director. Such writing shall be conclusive evidence of the due and proper appointment
of the County Commissioner.
C. Length of Terms. Each commissioner shall be appointed (or re -appointed) for a term of office
of five years from the date such commissioner is appointed (or re -appointed, if applicable). At the end of a
commissioner's term of office, the commissioner shall hold office until his or her successor has been
appointed, unless sooner removed according to this Ordinance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a person
appointed as the Assisted Commissioner may serve in that position only as long as he or she is directly
assisted by the Authority.
D. Method of Removal.
1. The Assisted Commissioner may be removed for neglect of duty, or misconduct in
office. Any such removal shall be evidenced in a resolution of the Board. The Assisted
Commissioner shall be removed only after he or she shall have been given a copy of the charges
by the Board Chair. Removal of the Assisted Commissioner requires a majority vote of the Board.
2. The Mayor of Spokane, with confirmation by the Spokane City Council, may remove a
Spokane Commissioner for neglect of duty or misconduct in office. A Spokane Commissioner
shall be removed only after he or she shall have been given a copy of the charges by (or on behalf
of) the Mayor of Spokane
3. The Mayor of Spokane Valley, with confirmation by the City of Spokane Valley Council
may remove a Spokane Valley Commissioner for neglect of duty, or misconduct in office. A
Spokane Valley Commissioner shall be removed only after he or she shall have been given a copy
of the charges by (or on behalf of) the Mayor of Spokane Valley.
4. The Board of County Commissioners may remove the County Commissioner for neglect
of duty or misconduct in office. The County Commissioner shall be removed only after he or she
shall have been given a copy of the charges by (or on behalf of) the chairperson.
Ordinance 18-005 SHA Page 3 of 5
DRAFT
E. Vacancies. A mid-term vacancy resulting from the death, resignation or removal of a
commissioner shall be filled by the appointment of a replacement commissioner. The replacement
commissioner shall be appointed in the manner set forth in Section 3(B). The replacement commissioner
shall serve for the remaining stated term of the replaced commissioner; however, if the remaining term of
the replaced commissioner is less than one year at the time the replacement commissioner is appointed, the
replacement commissioner shall serve for a full five-year term (measured pursuant to Section 3(C) of this
ordinance).
F. Quorum. Four commissioners shall constitute a quorum of the Board for the purpose of
conducting its business and exercising its powers and for all other purposes Action may be taken by the
Board upon a vote of a majority of the commissioners present at the time such action is taken, unless in any
case the bylaws of the Authority shall require a larger number.
G. Officers of the Board. The Board shall select from among its commissioners a Chair and a Vice
Chair of the Authority, each of whom shall serve in such capacity until the Board appoints a successor.
H. Compensation. A commissioner shall receive no compensation for his or her services for the
Authority, in any capacity, but he or she shall be entitled to the necessary expenses, including traveling
expenses, incurred in the discharge of his or her duties as a commissioner.
I. Existing Commissioners. The commissioners in office on the effective date of this Ordinance
shall continue to serve the respective terms, subject to removal pursuant to Section 2(D) of this Ordinance.
Section 4. Bylaws. The Board may adopt, and from time to time, may amend or restate, bylaws and
other rules of operation for the Authority. Bylaws of the Authority shall include provisions for annual,
regular and special meetings of the Board. The Bylaws shall be consistent with this Ordinance and chapter
35.82 RCW.
Section 5. Officers, Agents and Employees. The Authority may employ an Executive Director of the
Authority. If an Executive Director is employed, that individual also shall be Secretary of the Authority.
The Authority also may employ technical experts and such other officers, agents and employees, permanent
and temporary, as it may require, and shall determine their qualifications, duties and compensation. For
such legal services as it may require, the Authority may employ its own counsel and legal staff. The
Authority, acting through the Board, may delegate to one or more of its agents or employees such powers
or duties as it may deem proper.
Section 6. Allocation of Costs of the Authority.
A. The Authority is and shall be solely responsible for all debts and operating expenses incurred
in the operation of the Authority. No costs of the Authority shall be allocated to Spokane, Spokane Valley
or the County. The obligations of the Authority shall not be a debt of Spokane, Spokane Valley, the County,
the State of Washington or any political subdivision of the State of Washington (other than the Authority).
Subject to Section 7(B) of this Ordinance, neither Spokane, Spokane Valley, the County, the State of
Washington nor any political subdivision of the State of Washington (other than the Authority), shall be
liable for the obligations of the Authority, nor in any event shall obligations of the Authority be payable out
of any funds or properties other than those of the Authority.
B. Nothing in Section 7(A) of this Ordinance shall prevent Spokane, Spokane Valley, the County,
the State of Washington or a political subdivision of the State of Washington from providing assistance to
the Authority, financial or otherwise, under the Housing Cooperation Law (chapter 35.83 RCW) or any
other applicable law, or prevent the Authority from using any such assistance to pay obligations of the
Authority.
Ordinance 18-005 SHA Page 4 of 5
DRAFT
Section 7. Assumption of Responsibilities. The Authority assumes all of the contractual and financial
liabilities for the Housing Authority of the City of Spokane, as such liabilities existed on the date the
Authority became a joint housing authority under RCW 35.82.300.
Section 8. Deactivation of the Authority. Upon deactivation of the Authority as provided by law, the
assets of the Authority shall be applied and distributed pursuant to RCW 35.82.325. However, if the
Housing Authority of the City of Spokane is reactivated at the time the Authority is deactivated, it shall be
entitled to the return of all assets held by it prior to the organization of the Authority, and the Housing
Authority of the City of Spokane shall assume all debts encumbering and/or associated with said assets.
Section 9. Repeal of Certain Prior Acts. The City intends for this Ordinance to replace all prior
authorizing actions and hereby repeals all prior official acts related to authorizing the Authority that are
contrary to this Ordinance, including Resolution No. 03-047, and those actions shall have no further force
and effect other than to evidence that the Authority was duly organized as a joint housing authority pursuant
to RCW 35.82.300, and has operated as a joint housing authority at all times since September 24, 2001.
Such repeal shall not be effective until the date this Ordinance and the other substantive provisions become
effective.
Section 10. Ratification of Past Acts. All acts heretofore taken by Spokane, Spokane Valley and the
County to organize the Authority as a joint housing authority under RCW 35.82.300 are hereby ratified,
confirmed and approved.
Section 11. Severability. If any part of this Ordinance is declared unenforceable, invalid, or
unconstitutional, such unenforceability, invalidity, or unconstitutionality shall not affect the enforceability,
validity, or constitutionality of the remainder.
Section 12. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect on the latest of (A) the date
an ordinance substantially similar to this Ordinance takes effect as to Spokane under Article III, Section
19.B, of the Spokane City Charter; (B) the date an ordinance substantially similar to this Ordinance is
enacted by the County, or (C) five days after the date of publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof
in the official newspaper of the City as provided by law.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley this day of , 2018.
City of Spokane Valley
ATTEST:
L.R. Higgins, Mayor
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
Office of the City Attorney
Date of Publication:
Effective Date:
Ordinance 18-005 SHA Page 5 of 5
Spokane
Housing
Authority
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 29, 2018
TO: Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney
City of Spokane Valley
FROM: Pam Tietz, Executive Director
SUBJECT: Spokane Housing Authority
Joint Ordinance
Background
The Spokane Housing Authority was originally established in accordance with RCW 35.82 on
June 13, 1982 by a City of Spokane Resolution 255-1. For a Housing Authority to exist and
operate, the RCW requires a declaration of need by local jurisdictions.
SHA was later expanded as a Joint Housing Authority in accordance with RCW 35.82.300. This
was first to include unincorporated areas of Spokane County and then adding the City of
Spokane Valley in 2003. The City of Spokane Valley, City of Spokane and Spokane County then
adopted one additional resolution to approve the expansion of the board from five (5) members
to six (6) members to allow for one new board member, who must be a participant of SHA
services or "Directly Assisted Commissioner" and to establish that the City of Spokane Valley
had the authority appoint two of the six Commissioners (one slot ceded from Spokane County).
The original resolutions adopted by each jurisdiction included provisions that ideally would be in
agency bylaws or that periodically change. An example of this would be when regular meetings
will be held, the order of business on the agenda, what will be on a consent agenda, and who
the existing board is. This can create issues from an operating perspective and some confusion
as the board changes.
In addition, Spokane County has long held that they should have equal representation on SHA's
board and that there was some confusion when one of their two slots was ceded when the
updated resolution added a Directly Assisted Commissioner. The addition of this Commissioner
also took SHA's Board to an even number when ideally we should have an odd number of
Commissioners in the case of a tie.
Proposal
SHA has proposed a new Joint Ordinance for each of the three jurisdiction's consideration. The
changes are not substantial; however would simplify things from an operating standpoint; give
Spokane County an additional Commissioner position on SHA's Board; and make the total
number of board members 7 (an odd number).
The proposed ordinance has been vetted by each local jurisdictions legal counsel and the
proposed ordinance has been agreed to in principal. It is my recommendation that the updated
Joint Ordinance be adopted.
END OF MEMORANDUM
1
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. 03-047
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE
VALLEY, SPOKANE. COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PROVIDING FOR
APPOINTMENT, MEMBERS OF THF.. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AND
OPERATIONAL RULES FOR THE SPOKANE HOUSING AUTHORITY; AND
PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATING THERETO .
JOINT C1TY/COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Spokane County, Washington
BE FF RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, of
Spokane County, Washington:
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley, Washington ("CITY"), is a noncharter code city duly
organized and existing under and by virtue of the Constitution and the laws of the State of Washington;
and
WHEREAS, the Council of the CITY ("COUNCIL") recognizes the public interest in sustaining
affordable housing for the residents of the city and the surrounding community; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution dated May 13, 2003, COUNCIL recognized the need for tow -income
housing; and
WHEREAS, the Spokane Housing Authority ("AUTHORITY") has provided services within the
city limits of the city of Spokane Valley; and
WHEREAS, recognition of such geographical service area was recognized by Resolution of both
the City of Spokane and Spokane County deferring appointment to CITY, one member of the Board of
Commissioners of the AUTHORITY ("BOAR.D") who works or resides within the city of Spokane
Valley; and
WHEREAS, every housing authority in the State of Washington is authorized to do any and all
things necessary or desirable to secure the financial aid or cooperation of the federal government in the
undertaking, construction, maintenance or operation of any housing project by such authority pursuant to
RC\V 35.82.800; and
WHEREAS, AUTHORITY has in the past and will in the future, secure the financial aid and
cooperation of the federal government and is solely responsible for all debts and operating expenses
incurred in the operation of AUTHORI'T'Y.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY FOUND DETERMINED AND ORDERED as follows:
Section I: FINDING OF NECESSITY
Upon review of the information before it and after consideration of material provided to it,
COUNCIL makes the following determinations:
Rcsolunion 03-047 Page 1 of 6
(a) The affordability of adequate housing for a number of residents within the boundaries of
the city of Spokane Valley is an increasing problem;
(b) AUTHORITY has entered into a number of agreements with other municipalities within
Spokane County to assist. with this problem and has had success providing more housing opportunities
for low income individuals, but the problem of adequate housing for low income residents of this
community still remains;
Section 2: AUTHORiTY
(a) Name of Authority. The name of the Authority shall be and remain "Spokane Housing
Authority."
(b) Seal of the Authority. The seal of the Authority shall be in the form of a circle and shall
bear the name of the Authority and the year of its organization as a joint city/county housing authority.
(c) Office of Authority. The office of the Authority shall be at such place in the County of
Spokane, Washington, as the Authority may from time to time designate by Resolution. The official
office of the Authority is presently located at 55 W. Mission, Spokane, Washington.
Section 3: APPOINTiVIENT AND TENURE OF COMMISSION
A board of five (5) Commissioners (BOARD) composed of the following shall govern
AU`i'HORI'I'Y:
(a) Membership of the BOARD.
One (1) individual who is directly assisted by AUTHORITY, jointly appointed by the Mayor of
the City of Spokane, the Mayor of the City of Spokane Valley, and the Chair of the Board of County
Commissioners;
Two (2) individuals who work or reside within the city limits of the city of Spokane appointed by
the Mayor and confirmed by the Council of the City of Spokane;
One (1) individual who works or resides in unincorporated Spokane County, Washington,
appointed by the Board of Commissioners of Spokane. County; Washington;
One (1) individual who works or resides within the city limits of the city of Spokane Valley,
appointed by the Mayor and confirmed by COUNCIL of CiTY of Spokane Valley;
(b) Existing BOARD.
The term of each appointment shall be for five (5) years on a rotating basis in concurrence with
provisions under RCW 35.82.040. With the establishment of the joint city/county housing authority, the
following Commissioners and terns shall be certified as follows:
Julia Rahman — SHA -assisted Representative 3/15/2006
William Zeck —City of Spokane Representative 3/15/2004
Terri Symbol — County of Spokane Representative 3/15/2002
Resolution 03-047
Page 2 of 6
Richard Brittain — City of Spokane Representative 3/15/2005
Janet Bastine — City of Spokane Valley Representative 3/15/2008
Any seat vacated prior to the expiration of the term shall be filled by the appropriate jurisdiction
and shall be for the unexpired term of that Commissioner's seat.
(c)
Removal of Commissioner.
For inefficiency or neglect of duty or misconduct in office, a Commissioner may be removed by
the Mayor (if a City appointee); the Chair of the Board of County Commissioners (if a County
appointee); and the Mayor of Spokane and Chair jointly as SHA -assisted representative appointee. A
Commissioner may be removed only after having been given a copy of the charges at least ten (10) days
prior to the hearing thereon and after having an opportunity to be heard in person or by Council. In the
event of the removal of any Commissioner, a record of the proceedings, together with the charges and
findings thereon, shall be filed in the Office of the Secretary.
Section 4: OFFICERS
(a) Officers. The officers of AUTHORITY shall be a Chair, a Vice -Chair and a Secretary
who shall be the Executive Director.
(b) Chair. The Chair shall preside at all meetings of the BOARD. Except as otherwise
authorized by Resolution of the BOARD, the Chair shall sign all contacts, deed, and other instruments
made by AUTHORITY. At each meeting, the Chair shall submit such recommendations and information
as the Chair considers proper concerning the business, affairs and policies of AUTHORITY.
(c) Vice -Chair. The Vice -Chair shall perform the duties of the Chair in the absence or
incapacity of the Chair. In case of the resignation or death of the Chair, the Vice -Chair shall perform the
duties as are imposed on the Chair until such times as BOARD shall elect a new Chair.
(d) Secretary. The Secretary shall be the Executive Director of AUTHORITY and as such,
shall have general supervision over the administration of its business and affairs, subject to the direction
of AUTHORITY. The Executive Director shall be charged with the management of the housing projects
of AUTHORITY.
The Secretary shall keep the records of BOARD, shall act as secretary of the meetings of
BOARD and record all votes, and shall keep a record of the proceedings of' BOARD in a journal of
proceedings to be kept for such purposes, and shall perform all duties incident to the office. The
Secretary shall keep in safe custody, the seal of AUTHORITY and shall have the power to affix such seal
to all contracts and instruments authorized to be executed by AUTHORITY.
The Secretary shall have the care and custody of all funds of AUTHORITY, and shall deposit the
same in the name of AUTHORITY in such bank or banks as AUTHORITY may select. The Secretary
shall sign all orders and checks for the payment of money and shall pay out and disburse such moneys
under the direction of AUTHORITY. Except as otherwise authorized by Resolution of BOARD, all such
orders and cheeks shall be countersigned by the Chair. The Secretary shall keep regular books of
accounts showing receipts and expenditures and shall render to BOARD, at each regular meeting (or
more often if requested), an account of all AUTHORITY transactions and the financial condition of
AUTHORITY. The Secretary shall give such bond for the faithful performance of these duties as
BOARD may determine.
Resolution 03.047 ['age 3 of 6
The compensation of the Secretary shall be determined by BOARD, provided that a temporary
appointee selected from among the Commissioners of AUTHORITY shall serve without compensation
(other than the payment of necessary expenses).
(e) Other Duties. The officers of AUTHORITY shall perform such other duties and
functions as may from time to time be required by BOARD or the by-laws or rules and regulations of
AUTHORITY.
(t) Election of Appointment. The Chair and Vice -Chair shall be elected at the annual
meeting of AUTHORITY from among the Commissioners of AU'T'HORITY, and shall hold office for
one (1) year or until their successors are elected and qualified.
The Secretary shall be appointed by AUTHORITY. Any person appointed to fill the office of
Secretary, or any vacancy therein, shall have such term as AUTHORITY Fixed, but no Commissioner of
AUTHORITY shall be eligible for this office except as a temporary appointee.
(g) Vacancies. Should the office of Chair or vice -Chair become vacant, AUTHORITY shall
elect a successor from its membership at the next regular meeting, and such election shall be for the
unexpired term of said office. When the office of the Secretary becomes vacant, AUTHORITY shall
appoint a successor as aforesaid.
Section 5: MEETINGS
(a) Annual Meeting. The annual meeting of AUTHORITY shall be held on the third
Monday of October at 3:30 p.m. at the regular meeting place of AUTHORITY.
(b) Regular Meetings. Regular meetings shall be held without notice at such time and place
as may from time to time be determined and given public, legal notice.
(c) Special lviectings. The Chair of the BOARD may, when deemed expedient, and shall,
upon the written request of two (2) Commissioners of AUTHORITY, call a special meeting of the
BOARD for the purpose of transacting any business designated in the call. The call for a special meeting
may be delivered to each Commissioner of AUTHORITY to either the home or business address at least
two (2) days prior to the date of the special meeting. At such special meeting, no business shall be
considered other than as designated in the call, but if all of the Commissioners of AUTHORITY are
present at a special meeting, any and all business may be transacted at such special meeting.
(d) Quorum. The powers of AUTHORITY shall be vested in the Commissioners thereof in
office from time to time. Three (3) Commissioners shall constitute a quorum for the purpose of
conducting its business and exercising its powers and for all other purposes, but a smaller number may
adjourn from time to time until a quorum is obtained. When a quorum is in attendance, action may be
taken by AUTHORITY upon vote of the majority of the Commissioners present.
(e) Order of Business. At the regular meeting of AUTHORITY, the following shall be the
order of business:
1. Convening of Meeting
Action on proposed Resolutions and Motions
Resolution 03-047 Page 4 of 6
3. Consent Calendar
Approval of minutes of previous meeting
Review of month-end Financial Reports
Department reports
Resident Group reports
News & Notes
4. New Business
5. Unfinished Business
6. Adjournment
All Resolutions shall be in writing and shall be copied in a journal of the proceedings of
BOARD.
(f) Manner of Voting. The voting on all questions coming before AUTHORITY shall be by
voice vote, and the Ayes and Noes shall be entered upon the minutes of such meeting, except on the
election of officers which may be by ballot.
(g) Sub -Committees. Sub -committees may be established by the Chair as a standing or ad-
hoc committee. Sub -committees shall consist of two (2) Commissioners. At the request of the sub-
committe, AUTHORITY personnel may be assigned by the Secretary.
Section 6: AUTHORITY FOR OPERATION
(a) Statutory. AUTHORITY shall have the legal authority and the complete obligations as
set forth in the laws and Constitution of the State of Washington. Nothing set forth herein is intended in
any way to limit this authority or AUTHORITY'S ability to operate.
(b) Assumption of Responsibilities. AUTHORITY assumes all of the contractual and
financial liabilities for the Spokane Housing Authority.
(c) Professional Services. BOARD of AUTHORITY shall have the authority, from time to
time, to appoint the necessary professionals to assist it, including but not limited to legal counsel,
underwriting and financial services and other professional assistance deemed necessary.
(d) Bylaws.. BOARD may adopt, and from time to time amend, bylaws and other rules of
operation.
(e) Financial Responsibility. AUTHORITY shall be responsible for its own financial and
other obligations. Absent specific action by COUNCIL, CITY shall have no financial or other
responsibility for the operation of AUTHORITY.
Section 7: GENERAL, AUTHORIZATION
The Mayor, Chief Administrative Officer and the City Attorney, as agents and representatives of
CITY are hereby authorized and directed to do everything necessary to accomplish the acts set forth in
this Resolution.
Rexduiiun 03-047 Page 5 of 6
Section 8: RATIFICATION OF PAST ACTS
All acts as heretofore taken by CITY officers, staff, attorneys and agents consistent with the
terms and purposes of this Resolution are hereby ratified, confirmed and approved.
Section 9: SEVERABILITY
If any one or more of the covenants or agreements provided in this Resolution to be performed
on the part of CI'T'Y shall be declared by any court of competent jurisdiction to be contrary to law, then
such covenant or covenants, agreement or agreements, shall be null and void and shall be deemed
separable from the remaining covenants and agreements of this Resolution and shall in no way affect the
validity of the other provisions of this Resolution.
Section 10: REPEALER
All Resolutions or parts thereof in conflict herewith are, to the extent of such conflict, hereby
repealed, and shall have no further force or affect.
AT -
Section 1 I: EFFECTIVE DATE
This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
ADOPTED this 23`I day of September, 2003.
ristine Bainbridge, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
War
'tat ey Sch Iv Interim City Attorney
Resolution 03-U47
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Michael DeVleminayor
Paec 6 of 6
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: February 20, 2018
Check all that apply: ['consent ❑ old business
['information ❑admin. report
Department Director Approval:
® new business ['public hearing
['pending legislation ['executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Confirmation of Mayoral Appointment of
Councilmember to Board of Health
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Various ordinances, resolutions, and state statutes.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Annually, the Mayor makes appointment
recommendations to place Councilmembers on various regional boards and committees. The
appointments for the calendar year 2018 were confirmed by Council at the January 9, 2018
Council meeting. Since that time, Councilmember Peetz' schedule prevents her from attending
the Health Board meetings, and she has therefore resigned from that appointment. Mayor Higgins
intends to appoint Councilmember Arne Woodard to that board for the remainder of 2018.
The following are the Mayor's recommendations for each Councilmember's committee
assignments which were confirmed by Council at the January 9, 2018 Council meeting:
1. Spokane Clean Air Agency: Rod Higgins
2. Emergency 9-1-1: Brandi Peetz
3. Finance Committee: Rod Higgins, Pam Haley, and Ben Wick
4. Governance Manual Committee: Arne Woodard, Sam Wood, Linda Thompson
5. Greater Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce: Arne Woodard
6. Growth Management Steering Committee: Rod Higgins, Sam Wood
7. Greater Spokane, Inc. (GSI): Rod Higgins
8. Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee (HCDAC): Arne Woodard
9. Health District Board: Linda Thompson, Brandi Peetz
10. Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC): Sam Wood
11. Mayors' Association of NE Washington: Rod Higgins
12. Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC): Ben Wick
13. Spokane Transit Authority (STA): Pam Haley, Sam Wood; and Arne Woodard as alternate
14. TPA (Tourism Promotion, Hotel/Motel Association): Sam Wood
15. Visit Spokane: Pam Haley; and Linda Thompson as alternate
16. Wastewater Policy Advisory Board: Arne Woodard, Rod Higgins
OPTIONS: Move to confirm the Mayoral appointment of Councilmember Arne Woodard to the
Health District Board.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move to confirm the Mayoral appointment of
Councilmember Arne Woodard to the Health District Board for the remainder of 2018.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
COUNCIL CONTACT: Mayor Higgins
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: February 20, 2018 Department Director Approval: ❑
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Spokane County Saltese Flats FEMA Floodplain Restudy
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: CFR 44.65 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
BACKGROUND: In October of 2011, staff from Spokane County Utilities and the City met to discuss
the County's ongoing wetland restoration project and proposed restudy of the floodplain between the
wetland restoration area and Shelley Lake. On July 30, 2013, staff gave Council an update on the
wetlands restoration, which had been proposed in part to review possible ongoing sewer needs. The City
retained WEST Consultants to complete a comprehensive review of the Saltese Creek/Flats Floodplain
Study. This included review of floodplain submittals in order to assure the methodology was sound,
FEMA requirements were met, and the validation and calibration of the model matched the historical
data. WEST Consultants and the City have completed the review of the Spokane County submittal to
FEMA. Spokane County indicated they will send the FEMA required notification letters to affected
property owners in the County and in the City. Spokane County will then submit the map change package
(analysis, reports and proposed floodplain maps) to FEMA for formal review and approval.
The 100 -year floodplain within the City is an unnumbered A zone which means it was set without
performing a detailed flood study to determine a Base Flood Elevation (BFE). Based on this new
information derived by the County's detailed study, the floodplain area decreased on some properties,
increased on others, and a few properties were taken out of the floodplain. In addition, there were a few
properties that were previously outside the floodplain that are now touched by the floodplain. City staff
will work with all of these property owners to help them understand the implications of this designation
and assist the ones in the floodplain to prepare any necessary paperwork should they be able to qualify for
a Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA), which would remove the structure from the floodplain if the home
is elevated above the BFE.
OPTIONS: Discussion only
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A
STAFF CONTACT: John Hohman, Deputy City Manager; Henry Allen, Engineer; Deanna Horton,
Certified Floodplain Manager
ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint Presentation
Saltese Creek/Flats Flood Hazard Re -study
Photo date: May 1, 2013
Spokane County
Spokane County Environmental Services
February 20, 2018
Presentation Overview
• Saltese Flats wetland restoration project
• Reasons for the flood hazard restudy
• Flood hazard restudy results
Watershed Overview
• South of Spokane River and 1-90
• West of Liberty Lake
• East of Spokane Valley
• 14,000 acre watershed off Mica Peak
• 1,200 acre former lake bottom
• County owns 580 acres on Flats
Spokane County
it
Shalm
Lalc-
-
`4
_�
F
_
�1!k
J f
7.
Saltese Flats Wetland Restoration
• Project: Wetland restoration of 580 acres within an historic lake area
• Objective: Create site to provide:
• A functioning wetland system;
• More natural hydrology, in part to help improve low stream flows in the
Spokane River;
• Increased wildlife habitat;
• Public access and education; and
• Possible location for wetland enhancement with water reuse.
• Reclaimed water: Discharge not included in Phase 1
• Future discharge is probable, but not yet scheduled
Flood Hazard Analysis
• Needed for flood hazard restudy recognized prior to proposed
wetland project
• Wetland restoration is not allowed to increase flood hazards
upstream or downstream of Saltese Flats
• Significant questions about existing flood mapping
• Increased elevation moving downstream
• Current mapped topography doesn't match actual topography
• Current 1% flood elevation reached at Saltese Flats in 2011, 2012, and 2017
Existing Saltese Flats 1% Flood Map
• Increased elevation moving downstream
Spokane County
6
Existing Saltese Flats 1% Flood Map
• Increased elevation moving downstream
Spokane County
Existing Saltese Flats 1% Flood Map
• Increased elevation moving downstream
Spokane County
Existing Saltese Flats 1% Flood Map
• Current mapped flood area doesn't match actual topography
• Project area
Spokane County
Existing Saltese Flats 1% Flood Map
• Current mapped flood area doesn't match actual topography
• Project area
• Current flood area (red)
• Mapped elevation =
2042' NAVD88
Spokane County
10
Existing Saltese Flats 1% Flood Map
• Current mapped flood area doesn't match actual topography
• Project area
+
• Current flood area (red)
• Mapped elevation =
2042' NAVD88
+
• Actual 2042' elevation line
(green)
Existing Saltese Flats 1% Flood Map
• Current 1% flood elevation reached in 2011, 2012, & 2017
• Project area
• Actual 2042' elevation line
(green)
Photo year — 2011
Spokane County
12
Existing Saltese Flats 1% Flood Map
• Current 1% flood elevation reached in 2011, 2012, & 2017
• Project area
• Actual 2042' elevation line
(green)
Photo year — 2012
Spokane County
Flood Hazard Analysis
• County Environmental Services, in coordination with County Public Work and
City of Spokane Valley has:
• Completed a draft restudy of existing flood hazards in the watershed;
• Intends to notify property owners near or inside special flood hazard areas;
• Will submit the draft analysis for FEMA review; and
• Community appeal period will occur after FEMA review.
Proposed Flood
Hazard
Mapping
within
Spokane Valley
Spokane County
117
ettrt
,72
_,:l,,,/'
CI,rtt7lOPIt
',39
3, Shelley Lake
(STATIC 2027 3)
6, Flood Storage Area
76
1
ea
Effective Zone A
f'ecivn Zone AE
r ✓cf Annual Chow Flood Hazard
Reposed 02 PCT Anneal Chance Floed NazaN
Aerial Imagery: 2015 NAIP
Created by: T. Bean Date: 10/132 017
Parcels- City of Spokane valley
0 225 450
1:6,000
900 / /� \
Feet (\�fj I�/I
Map # 1
RESPEC
15
Proposed Flood
Hazard
Mapping
within
Spokane Valley
Spokane County
tkviRaNnrNTAI sEnvicts
Effective Zone AE
Proposed Medway
Frovoveo 1 POT ai uti .inye F vani Hazord
Aerial Imagery: 20153.310
Created by: T. Bonn Date: 10/1312017
Parcels- City ot Spokane Valluv
--- County Boundary
0 155 310
1:4.200
620
Feet @
Map # 2
RSC
Proposed Flood
Hazard
Mapping
within
Spokane Valley
Spokane County
Effective Zone AE Parcels- City of Spokane Valley
Proposed Medway --- County Boundary
Frau .. 1 POT Ai -ual Gan. Fvoo Placard
Aerial Imagery: 2015 NAI.
Created by: T. Senn Date: 10/132017
0 155 310
1:4,200
620 / /� \
Feet (\�fj I�/I
Map # 3
R✓PEC
17
Some Parcels are not affected
purple is the existing, red is the proposed
Spokane County
18
Parcels where the floodplain narrowed in places
but increased in others, existing in purple, proposed in red
Spokane County
19
Parcels where floodplain increased,
existing in purple, proposed in red
Spokane County
20
Parcels where the floodplain narrowed in places
but increased in others, existing in purple, proposed in red
Spokane County
21
Questions?
Spokane County
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: February 20, 2018
Check all that apply: ['consent ❑ old business
['information ® admin. report
Department Director Approval:
['new business ['public hearing
['pending legislation ['executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Functional Classification of City Streets
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Not Applicable
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None
BACKGROUND: The City of Spokane Valley follows state and federal guidelines to classify
city streets according to existing function and purpose as well as planned future conditions and
function. This process allows city -maintained streets to be planned, designed and constructed
to accommodate appropriate traffic volumes, modes, and speeds; to meet land use and access
needs; to program maintenance resources effectively; and to qualify for applicable design and
construction resources from state and federal funding agencies.
In the past ten years, the City of Spokane Valley submitted five reclassification applications to
the Federal Highway Administration, via the Washington State Department of Transportation.
The City submitted these applications to appropriately match changes in the function of key
streets. This reclassification enabled efficient allocation of maintenance and construction
resources to these streets according to traffic volumes, speeds, and land access functions.
Tonight's presentation describes the functional classification hierarchy, the definitions of each
classification, the process of classifying streets, and recent examples of reclassification.
OPTIONS: Discussion
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None
STAFF CONTACT: Mike Basinger, AICP, Economic Development Manger
Colin Quinn -Hurst, Senior Transportation Planner
ATTACHMENTS: Functional Classification of City Streets Presentation
SPOKANE
VALLEY
ECONOM9C DEVELOPMENT
1
City of Spokane Valley
1
1
Collector
111 1.
II1IIU
;11:11 111
iIi■D!
damp
MEW
iN
■ ■■■
MION
- Niiili
Minor Arteria
Local Access
mil —===.2
ry--
ME
g1551" _
1nom ddEs= 104-
11 iN•
suit
LIMAIL'amp.inW1
maL73"mm Emsni
-p--iMEP
Y1=��1ns=y1mm
... -:IIMESEEML.
4.
Villi p r
C!a■i
+ A 1
SPOKANE
VALLEY
- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Ii_se- �'�a 5 b
i r - CO
..114,111
2
Functional Classifications
va
SPOKANE
VALLEY
- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Purpose:
■ Match road design with
mobility and access needs
■ Match road function with
land use goals
■ Prioritize maintenance funds
■ Qualify for federal funding
3
FHWA
Roadway
Classification
Hierarchy
SPOKANE
VALLEY
- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Federal Categories
All Roads
Arterial
Principal
Full Control
Interstate
Other
Freeways &
Expressways
Minor
Partial /
Uncontrolled
Other
Principal
Arterial
Non -Arterial
Collector
Major
Local
Minor
iourcc.° _s_ / _ #J)1t l
4
Federal Functional Classifications
Non -Arterials Arterials
• Local Streets • Minor Arterials
■MinorCollectors ■Principal Arterials
■Major Collectors lnterstates +
Freeways
SPOKANE
VALLEY
- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
5
City of Spokane Valley Classifications
Local Access
Collectors
_.
inor Arterials
SPOKANE
VALLEY
ECONOM9C DEVELOPMENT
6
Composition of Spokane Valley Streets
MinorArterial 15%
Collectors 7%
Funding Eligibility
Principal $$$$
Minor $$$ IGRANTS
Collector $$
Local Access $
Few Grants
RSPOKANE VALLEY
- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
*Streets must be functionally classified to be eligible for federal funds.
8
Local Access
■ Provide direct access to adjacent land
■ Carry no through -traffic movement
■ Connect to higher -class systems
Source: FHWA
SPOKANE
VALLEY
- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
9
Local Access Per Street Standards
LA
SPOKANE
VALLEY
- ECONONMC DEVELOPMENT
Example Cross -Section
10
Collectors
■Serve land access and circulation
■ In higher density residential and commercial
■ Channel trips between local roads and arterials
■ Often include signalized intersections
Source: FHWA
SPOKANE
VALLEY
- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
11
Collector
6'
Sidewalk
40' Paving
7'
Planting
12'
12'
6'
Sidewalk
10'
Swale
21
=16
LA
SPOKANE
VALLEY
- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Example Cross Section
12
Minor Arterial
■ Carry moderate -length trips
■ Distribute trips to small geographic areas
■ Connect to principal arterials
Source: FHWA
SPOKANE
VALLEY
- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
13
Minor Arterial
6'
Sidewalk
48' Paving
7' 6' 12' 12'
Planting I . �� ►�
12, rt
-I
12' 6'
•
W. .
6'
Sidewalk
7'
► I * Plantin
"rtt 2'
1)
1111111111111
SPOKANE
VALLEY
ECONOM/C DEVELOPMENT
Example Cross Section
14
Principal Arterial
■Serve major activity centers
■Carry highest proportion of urban travel
On minimum of mileage
EServe travel between commercial core and outlying areas
Source: FHWA
LA
SPOKANE
VALLEY
ECONOMIC
15
1 6'
Sidewalk
1
5'
pi,
2'
68' Paving 6'
Transit Sidewalk
6' 12' 12' 12' 12' 12' 6'
J
t�1 1 1
y
MIN
1 1
LA
SPOKANE
VALLEY
- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
xamp e ross ec ion
16
Principal Arterial
Spokane County
■ SRTC
• WSDOT
■ FHWA
City Incorporated
SPOKANE
VALLEY
- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Classification History
Classification Process
SRTC WSDOT WSDOT H
1 week
City Application
Eastern Region 2 — 4 weeks
1 week
SRTC WSDOT WSDOT HQ
Eastern Region
FHWA
2-4 weeks
SPOKANE
VALLEY
- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
2 — 4 weeks
18
Reclassifications
Since Incorporation:
Reclassifications
1i.iil
State Pal I.
Mansfield Ave.
Indiana Ave.
Valleyway Ave.
Downgraded
Evergreen Rd.
Minor Arterial
Mission Ave.
)ishman
Collector
Local Access
Vista Rd.
Conklin Rd.
D4shman
Hing
Schafer Rd.
Downgraded
Sullivan Rd.
ands Rd. Downgraded
SPOKANE
VALLEY
44th Ave. Downgraded
Stree
Fro
1
Mansfield Ave. Pines Rd. Mirabeau Pkwy.
Indiana Ave. Sullivan Rd. Flora Rd.
Mission Ave. Flora Rd. Barker Rd.
Conklin Rd. 4th Ave. Sprague Ave.
4th Ave. Sullivan Rd. Conklin Rd.
Schafer Rd. 44th Ave. Dishman Mica Rd.
Sullivan Rd. 16th Ave. Saltese Rd.
44th Ave. Schafer Rd. Sands Rd.
Sands Rd. 44th Ave. Dishman Mica Rd.
Vista Rd. Appleway Blvd. Sprague Ave.
Evergreen Rd. Sprague Ave. Indiana Ave.
Valleyway Ave. Park Rd. Flora Rd.
Reclassifications
Previous Class.
Local
Proposed Arterial
Collector
Local
Local
Minor Arterial
Minor Arterial
Minor Arterial
Minor Arterial
Local
Minor Arterial
Collector
Current Class.
Collector
Minor Arterial
Minor Arterial
Collector
Collector
Collector
Principle Arterial
Collector
Collector
Collector
Principal Arterial
Local
Year
2015
2012
2012
2011
2011
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
•
r 4A
fi—. r
1,. per'
NenAk
SPOKANE
VALLEY
- ECONOM9C DEVELOPMENT -
}
•
•
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: February 20, 2018 Department Director Approval: ❑
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. Report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Sprague Avenue Street Preservation Project — Sullivan to Corbin
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010, Perpetual Advanced Six -Year plans for
coordinated transportation program expenditures.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
• 6/28/2016: Council passed Resolution 16-009, adopting the 2017-2022 Six Year TIP,
which included this project.
• 2/7/2017: Admin report for amending the 2017 TIP
• 05/23/17: Council passed Resolution 17-011, adopting the 2018-2023 Six Year TIP, which
included this project.
BACKGROUND: The Pavement Management Program identified the segment of Sprague
Avenue between Sullivan Road and Corbin Road as a priority project. This road segment shows
numerous areas of pavement stress such as cracking and potholes.
In 2017, the City submitted a grant application and was awarded Surface Transportation Program
(STP) funds. The initial, 2017, project budget was:
City Match (311) $ 208,950
CMAQ Grant $ 1,531,050
Total estimated costs $ 1,770,000
Since the project was awarded, the stormwater division identified needed stormwater
improvements that can be done in conjunction with the project. These improvements include
replacing failing structures and providing sediment control to improve stormwater treatment.
These improvements are estimated to cost $207,273 and will be paid from Fund 402. With the
stormwater improvements, the total expected project cost is estimated at $1,977,273.
This project will grind and inlay 2.5 inches of hot mix asphalt; update some pedestrian ramps,
make stormwater improvements and modifications to the signal system at the Flora Road
intersection.
City staff designed the project plans. The project is expected to be advertised on March 2, 2018
with bids opening on March 23, 2018. Council consideration for the award of this bid is currently
scheduled for April 3, 2018.
OPTIONS: Discussion only
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion only
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The total project budget is $1,977,273. There are sufficient
funds to cover the cost for this project.
STAFF CONTACT: Gloria Mantz, PE, Engineering Manager
Erica Amsden, PE, Project Manager
ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint Presentation
Spokane
Valle
February 2Q,2Oi
Gloria Mantz, PE, Engineering Manager
Erica Amsden, PE, Project Manager
Presentation Agenda
February 20, 2018
Project Location
Existing Conditions
Project Design
Temporary Traffic Control
Project Cost & Funding
Next Steps
Spokane
.000 Valley
Project Location
February 20, 2018
Spokane
3
Existing Conditions
February 20, 2018
Existing Conditions
Pavement in Need of Resurfacing
Heavy Commuter Traffic — Morning &
Afternoon
Numerous Business Entrances
Several Residential Entrances
4
Existing Conditions
February 20, 2018
Pedestrian Ramps — Majority Do Not
Meet Current ADA Requirements
Flora Intersection Requires Signal
Modifications
Roadway Requires Stormwater
Upgrades
5
Project Design
February 20, 2018
2.5" Grind and Inlay Drive Lanes
Replace Failing Drywells & Provide Sediment Control
Modify Signal at Flora
2' LANE
14' NO WAY LEFT TURN LANE
12' LANE
LANE
7'
7
SPRAGUE AVE
TYPICAL SECTION
Temporary Traffic Control
February 20, 2018
Night Paving to Minimize Business Impacts
Driveway Access to Businesses will be Maintained Except for
Temporary Closures while Paving
Temporary Sidewalk Detours
Sprague Avenue Traffic Restrictions
Single Lane Closures for the Majority of the Project
Two Eastbound and One Westbound Lanes for Two Weeks
One Lane in Each Direction from late July to Mid August
Temporary Intersection Closures and/or Turn Restrictions at Flora,
Conklin & Corbin SP "ok
7 ane
Bus Stops may be Temporarily Relocated Valley �`
Budget and Funding
February 20, 2018
Project Estimated Cost
Preliminary Engineering
Construction Engineering
Construction Contract
Total Estimated Cost
Project Estimated Budget
City Fund 311
City Fund 402
Federal Grant
8 Total Estimated Budget
$ 181,335
$ 108,185
$ 1,687,753
$ 1,977,273
$ 238,950
$ 207,273
$ 1,531,050
$ 1,977,273
Spokane
.000 Valley
9
Public Outreach
February 20, 2018
Community Meeting on February 6, 2018
Approximately 20 Attendees
General Response to the Project — Positive
Started Contacting Business owners Prior to Construction
Email Construction Updates
Contractor will Provide a Public Liaison
Spokane
.000 Valley
Tentative Schedule
February 20, 2018
March 2
March 23
April 3
June 18
Mid August
Bid Advertisement
Bid Opening
Council Bid Award
Construction Start
Project Completion
Spokane
.000 Valley
Questions and Next Steps
February 20, 2018
11
Spokane
.000 Valley
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: February 20, 2018
Check all that apply: ['consent ❑ old business
['information ® admin. report
Department Director Approval: ❑
['new business ['public hearing
['pending legislation ['executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Wellesley Avenue Sidewalk (McDonald to Evergreen)
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010, Perpetual Advanced Six -Year plans for
coordinated transportation program expenditures.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
• 6/28/2016: Council passed Resolution 16-009, adopting the 2017-2022 Six Year TIP,
which included this project.
• 2/28/2017: Council passed Resolution 17-006, amending the 2017 TIP
BACKGROUND: The Wellesley Avenue Sidewalk Project (McDonald to Evergreen) will provide
a sidewalk on the north side of Wellesley from McDonald to Evergreen.
In 2016, the City applied for, and was awarded, a Safe Routes to School Program grant. The
project budget, utilizing the grant, is:
City Fund 301
City Fund 402
Safe Routes to School Grant
Total estimated costs
$ 38,700
$ 6,000
$ 402,300
$ 447,000
The grant application states that the project will provide curb, gutter, sidewalk, and ADA
compliant ramps at crossings.
Wellesley Avenue is a minor arterial. Per the City street standards, the minimum travel width for
minor arterials is 44 feet. To the east of the project, Wellesley Avenue is 44 feet wide with
adjacent sidewalks on both sides of the roadway. This segment of Wellesley is striped as a two
lane street, with bike and parking lanes on both sides. Within the project limits, the pavement
width is approximately 36 feet with two, 12 -foot lanes and five-foot paved shoulders on both
sides. A pavement widening on the north side will be required to provide the required travel
width and to match the street section to the east of the project. Unfortunately, the initial
estimate for this project did not anticipate pavement widening.
Staff has explored several alternatives for providing pedestrian access along this project. The
following alternatives will be discussed with Council.
Alternative #1: Improve Wellesley per the Street Standards by widening the pavement
approximately 3.5 feet, install curb and gutter and an adjacent sidewalk on the north side of the
roadway. Separated sidewalk cannot be accommodated within the existing right-of-way.
Estimated cost for these improvements is $576,000. If this alternative is selected, there is a
funding gap of $129,000.
Alternative #2: Provide left turn lanes at the intersections with McDonald and Evergreen.
Provide curb and gutter and a separated sidewalk when right-of-way is available. This
alternative would preclude parking on Wellesley but will provide snow storage between the
sidewalk and the back of curb. The estimated cost for these improvements is $546,000. If this
alternative is selected, there is a funding gap of $99,000.
Alternative #3: Leave the pavement as is and install a separated asphalt path along the north
side of Wellesley. This alternative has been approved by Safe Routes to School if "No Parking"
signs are installed as part of the project. This alternative would allow pedestrian improvements
to Wellesley without having to remove curb and gutter. The estimated cost for these
improvements is $390,000. If this alternative is selected, there are sufficient funds in the budget
for the project.
Alternative #4: Do not construct the project and return used Safe Route to School funds,
approximately $3,500. Total expenditures for this project are approximately $21,000 to date for
preliminary engineering design and surveying.
OPTIONS: Discussion only
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Various impacts depending on selected alternative.
STAFF CONTACT: Gloria Mantz, PE, Engineering Manager
Bill Helbig, PE, City Engineer
ATTACHMENTS: Power Point Presentation
Project Update
Spokane
Valle
February 2O2i
Gloria Mantz, PE, Engineering Manager
Bill Helbig, PE, City Engineer
Presentation Agenda
February 20, 2018
Project Location
Project Scope
Project History
Existing Conditions and Alternatives
Project Cost & Funding
Next Steps
Spokane
.000 Valley
Project Location
February 20, 2018
•
•
•
Wellesley Ave
E Vkie.i•o ley_Ave
14.
Hero/ Ave
X18
Alt
a -111
cirfc.A. Corpora r. C 2:18 Di : 24)18, ,�•Uki_i7
.t.
40,
E'r1leue7
'hU 1)18 10"
3
S` `"ohne
P
.0.10Va11ey
Project Scope
February 20, 2018
Safety Project —Wellesley Avenue (McDonald to Evergreen)
Sidewalk
Curb & Gutter
ADA Ramps
Marked Crossings
Spokane
.000 Valley
Project History
February 20, 2018
Project Estimated Cost — 2016
Engineering
ROW
Construction
Total Estimated Cost
Project Estimated Budget
City Fund 301
City Fund 402
Safe Routes to School Grant
Total Estimated Budget
$ 34,667
$ 5,000
$ 407,333
$ 447,000
$ 38,700
$ 6,000
$ 402,300
$ 447,000
Spokane
_ Valley
Existing conditions
February 20, 2018
6
Wellesley Avenue — Minor Arterial
Minimum 44 Feet of Travel Width
(Street Standards)
Fully Improved East of the Project
Pavement Width 32 to 34 feet within
the Project Limits
Grant Application Assumed No
Pavement Widening
Spokane
_ Valley
Alternative # 1
February 20, 2018
Improve Wellesley Avenue - Widen Pavement North Side
Adjacent Sidewalk with Curb & Gutter (North Side Only)
Existing ROW cannot accommodate separated sidewalk without
significant expense and delay
Project Estimated Cost
Preliminary Engineering
Construction Engineering
Construction Contract
Total Estimated Cost
Funding Gap - $129,000
$ 48,000
$ 48,000
$ 477,000
$ 576,000
Spokane
.0,0s Valley
Alternative # 1
February 20, 2018
8
6'
CONC. SIDEWALK
1.5'
EXISTING ROW
30'
5'
22'
TRAVEL WIDTH
EXISTING BIKE
LANE
ASPHALT PATCH
CONC. CURB AND GUTTER
12'
EXISTING WB LANE
Spokane `
ii Valley
Alternative #2
February 20, 2018
Left Turn Lanes on Wellesley at Intersections with McDonald and Evergreen
Pavement Width Remains Unchanged Otherwise
No Parking on Roadway
Sidewalk on North Side (Separated when ROW is Available)
Project Estimated Cost
Preliminary Engineering
Construction Engineering
Construction Contract
Total Estimated Cost
Funding Gap - $99,000
9
$ 45,500
$ 45,500
$ 455,000
$ 546,000
Alternative # 2
February 20, 2018
1.5'
6'
CONC. SIDEWALK
a
10
EXISTING ROW
30'
5' 110.• --
BUFFER BUFFER
17'
- 5'
TRAVEL WIDTH
EXISTING BIKE
LANE
ASPHALT PATCH
CONC. CURB
12'
EXISTING WB LANE
CONCRETE SIDEWALK DESIGN
(CROSS SECTION - NTS)
Alternative #3
February 20, 2018
Asphalt Path on North Side (Separated when ROW is Available)
Pavement Width Remains Unchanged
No Parking on Roadway (Including Signs)
Project Estimated Cost
Preliminary Engineering
Construction Engineering
Construction Contract
Total Estimated Cost
Sufficient Funds in the Budget
$ 32,500
$ 32,500
$ 325,000
$ 390,000
Spokane
_ Valley
Alternative # 3
February 20, 2018
12
6'
ASPHALT TRAIL
EXISTING ROW
30'
6'
GRAVEL SHOULDER
5'
17'
TRAVEL WIDTH
EXISTING BIKE
LANE
12'
EXISTING WB LANE
S` `"okane
P Va11ey
�s
Alternative #4
February 20, 2018
Do not construct the project and pay back reimbursed Safe
Routes to School (SRS) funds.
Expenditures
Staff time $ 7,000
Surveying $ 14,500
Total Estimated Cost $ 21,500
Reimbursed SRS are roughly $3,500.
13
Spokane
.000 Valley
Questions and Next Steps
February 20, 2018
Discuss Options with Council
Host Community Meeting
Council to Select an Alternative
Design Project in 2018
Spokane
.000 Valley
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: February 20, 2018
Check all that apply: ['consent ❑ old business
['information ® admin. report
Department Director Approval: ❑
['new business ['public hearing
['pending legislation ['executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: False Alarm Code Amendment
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council approved the False Alarm Program contract
C09-163 on October 13, 2009, which became effective January 1, 2010, and ended December
31, 2012, and which included up to three additional, one-year contract renewals. Council
extended the contract for one additional year on December 29, 2015. Council provided
consensus to move forward with an internal false alarm program and amended ordinance on
October 18, 2016. Council approved an amended False Alarm Ordinance 17-001 on January
10, 2017.
BACKGROUND: The City started the current false alarm program in 2010 in order to reduce
the number of false alarms, improve police response times, increase officer safety, and create
more time for proactive policing.
Spokane Valley Municipal Code 7.20.010.A states, "The City regulates security alarm
businesses to assure that responses to false alarms do not diminish the availability of police
services to the general public and to assure that citizens who cannot afford or do not choose to
operate security alarm systems are not penalized for their condition or choice."
Spokane Valley Municipal Code 7.20.130.A. states, "Causing police to engage in a false alarm
response constitutes an appropriation of public police services for private purposes and is
subject to a cost recovery fee."
In 2015, staff conducted an evaluation of the program, costs and revenues, and dispatch
records. Council approved several changes to the program based upon that evaluation,
including lowering the cost recovery fees.
In October of 2016, Council approved a new in-house false alarm reduction program that
reduced costs further, simplified administration, and reduced government regulation and
intrusion. This program does not require registration of an alarm system and makes police
response to an alarm trip voluntary for the alarm system owner. The customer may opt -out of
that service with the alarm monitoring company.
The accompanying draft code amendment language presented will clarify the duties of the
alarm administrator, including the ability to mitigate a cost recovery fee up to 25% if he believes
the facts and circumstances warrant it.
Additionally, after suspending the false alarm reduction program while an in-house program and
accompanying database were developed, the program is scheduled to restart on approximately
March 15, 2018.
The City is sending letters out to all known alarm companies and publishing an article in the Hot
Topics Newsletter to inform people of the program reinstatement, lower costs, and fewer
requirements.
OPTIONS: Proceed to First Reading or request more information.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consensus to proceed to a first reading of the False
Alarm Code Amendment.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Approximately $500 in cost for online payment services. All
costs are included in the cost recovery fee.
STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Koudelka, Senior Administrative Analyst, John Pietro Administrative
Analyst
ATTACHMENTS: False Alarm Code Amendment Draft Language
7.20.170 Mitigation and Appeals.
(A) Mitigation of Fees. False alarm response cost recovery fees may be mitigated in lu-certain
circumstances as follows:an alarm owner who is assessed a false alarm cost recovery fee may
accept the determination of a police response to be a false alarm but may wish to present mitigating
circumstances to the alarm administrator.
(1) The mitigation process shall be initiated by the alarm user contacting the alarm
administrator, either in person, by mail, or by phone and identifying anyreguesting that the
alarm administrator consider mitigating circumstances pertaining to the incident resulting in
the false alarm cost eeevery fee. This request shall be received by the alarm administrator
within 30 calendar days after mailing of the initial invoice to the alarm owner. Failure to
comply with this 30 -day requirement shall render any mitigation request untimely and
therefore void. A request to mitigate the fees shall not toll the 30 -day appeal period pursuant
to SVMC 7.20.170(B).
(2) The alarm administrator is authorized to mitigate the false alarm response cost recovery fee
by up to 25% if, in the alarm administrator's discretion, the facts and circumstances warrant
mitigation. If mitigation is approved, the alarm user waives any further right to appeal.
(B) Appeals of False Alarm Response Cost Recovery Fees. False alarm response cost recovery
fees may be appealed to the alarm administrator, as follows:
(1)4. The appeal process shall be initiated by the alarm user sending a letter to the alarm
administrator requesting that the false alarm response cost recovery fee be waived, and
specifying the reasons for the appeal. This letter shall be received by the alarm administrator
within 30 calendar days after mailing of the initial invoice to the alarm owner. Failure to
comply with this 30 -day requirement shall render any appeal untimely and therefore void.
W(2) False alarm response cost recovery fees may be appealed only on the grounds that the
incident cited as the basis for the false alarm vielati-encost recovery fee service fee was, in fact,
not a false alarm response or that the alarm was activated due to an extreme weather event or
a natural disaster. Human error or mechanical/electronic failure of the security alarm system
are not valid reasons for appeal. The alarm user shall, in his letter requesting an appeal, describe
detailed, credible evidence in his possession that supports the assertion that the incident was a
valid alarm pursuant to SVMC 7.20.130(C) or (D) an alarm activation due to an extreme
weather event or natural disaster.
(3) The alarm administrator may reject requests for appeals that are not supported by
detailed, credible evidence of criminal activity or extreme weather events or natural disasters.
Notice of rejection of a request for this initial appeal shall be sent to the appellant in writing
within 10 calendaPaczer4Eing days following receipt of the appeal request by the alarm
administrator.
ft(4) The alarm administrator may affirm or, waive, cancel, or modify the false alarm response
cost recovery fees or actions that are the subject of the appeal. A record of the determination
on each appeal requestany modification of the false alarm cost recovery fee shall be recorded
and forwarded to the police chief and the city manager on a monthly basis.
(C) If the alarm administrator affirms or modifies the amount of a false alarm response recovery
fee due, that amount becomes immediately due and payable. A record of the determination on
each appeal and mitigation request shall be forwarded to the police chief and the city manager on
a monthly basis.
F(D) The official decision of the alarm administrator shall be final and not subject to further
appeal.
To:
From:
Re:
DRAFT
ADVANCE AGENDA
as of February 15, 2018; 10:00 a.m.
Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative
Council & Staff
City Clerk, by direction of City Manager
Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings
February 27, 2018, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue, Feb 201
Proclamation: Developmental Disabilities Awareness Month
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes)
2. Second Reading Ordinance 18-003 Amending Street Standards - Henry Allen, Micki Harnois (15 minutes)
3. Second Reading Ordinance 18-004 Updating Subdivision Regulations - Marty Palaniuk
4. Second Reading Ordinance 18-005 Spokane Housing Authority, Re-Auth. -E.Lamb
5. Admin Report: Potential Grant Opportunities (FMSIB) - Adam Jackson
6. Admin Report: Crave Contract - Lesli Brassfield, Mike Basinger
7. Admin Report: Appleway Trail Update - Mike Stone, Gloria Mantz, Mike Basinger
8. Admin Report: Advance Agenda
9. Info Only: (a)Dept Reports
(10 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(20 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(15 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 90 mins]
March 6, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m.
ACTION ITEMS:
1. First Reading Ordinance 18-006, False Alarm Code Amendment - Morgan
2. Motion Consideration: Appleway Trail -Mike Stone, Mike Basinger
NON -ACTION ITEMS:
3. Proposed Amended TIP - Colin Quinn -Hurst
4. Code Text Amendment, Small cell Facilities - Erik Lamb
5. Accomplishments Report (2017)
6. Advance Agenda
March 13, 2018, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed Amended 2018 TIP - Colin Quinn -Hurst
la. Proposed Resolution Amending 2018 TIP
2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
3. Second Reading Ordinance 18-006 False Alarm Code Amendment - Morgan Koudelka
4. First Reading Ordinance, 18-007, Small Cell - Erik Lamb
5. Motion Consideration: Crave Contract - Lesli Brassfield, Mike Basinger
6. Motion Consideration: Potential Grant Opportunities (FMSIB) - Adam Jackson
7. Admin Report: Potential Grant Opportunities (SRTC, SRTS, PBP, CSP) - Adam Jackson
8. Admin Report: GSI Contract - John Hohman, Mike Basinger
9. Advance Agenda
Koudelka
[due Tue, Feb 271
(10 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(20 minutes)
(15 minutes)
(- 90 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 150 mins]
[due Tue Mar 61
(15 minutes)
March 20, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m.
1. 8th Ave. Sidewalk - Thierman to Dickey - Erica Amsden, Gloria Mantz
2. Painted Hills Update - John Hohman, Cary Driskell, Erik Lamb
3. Street O&M Payment Preservation & Street Construction - Adam Jackson, Mike Basinger
4. Advance Agenda
(5 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(15 minutes)
(15 minutes)
(20 minutes)
(20 minutes)
(15 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 120 mins]
[due Tue Mar 131
(10 minutes)
(25 minutes)
(60 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 100 mins]
March 27, 2018, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue Mar 201
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes)
2. Second reading ordinance 18-007 Small Cell - Erik Lamb (15 minutes)
3. Motion Consideration: Potential Grant Opportunities (SRTC, SRTS, PBP, CSP) - Adam Jackson (10 mins)
4. Admin Report: Outside Agency, Allocation History/Discussion - Chelsie Taylor (20 minutes)
Draft Advance Agenda 2/15/2018 1:39:00 PM Page 1 of 2
5. Admin Report: Economic Analysis of Tourism Related Venues & Events — Chelsie Taylor
6. Advance Agenda
7. Info Item: Department Reports
(45 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 100 mins]
April 3, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue Mar 27]
ACTION ITEMS:
1. Motion Consideration, Sprague Ave. Preser. Project -Sullivan to Corbin — E.Amsden, Gloria Mantz (15 min)
NON -ACTION ITEMS:
2. Airport Update — Larry Krauter (15 minutes)
April 10, 2018, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
April 17, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m.
ACTION ITEMS:
1. Motion Consideration: 8th Ave. Sidewalk, Thierman to Dickey- E. Amsden, G.Mantz
NON -ACTION ITEMS:
2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins
April 24, 2018, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. Info Item: Department Reports
May 1, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda
Mav 8, 2018, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
Mav 15, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda
Mav 22, 2018, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. Info Item: Department Reports
Mav 29, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda
*time for public or Council comments not included
OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING
Animal Control Regulations (SVMC 7.30)
Camping in RVs
Citizen Recognition (city keys)
City Hall Generator
Donation Recognition
Duplex/Single Family Dwellings Definition
Governance Manual
ITS/SRTMC Discussion
Legislative Remote Testimony (Chambers)
Naming City Facilities Protocol
Neighborhood Restoration Program
Police Dept Quarterly Rpt (April, July, Oct, Jan)
[due Tue April3]
(5 minutes)
[due Tue April 10]
(10 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[due Tue April 17]
(5 minutes)
[due Tue April 24]
[due Tue Mav 11
(5 minutes)
[due Tue Mav 81
[due Tue Mav 151
(5 minutes)
[due Tue Mav 221
ISSUES/MEETINGS:
Police Precinct Lease Renewal (Nov '18)
Retail Recruitment Follow-up
Sign Ordinance
Street Illumination (ownership, cost, location)
Tobacco 21 Resolution
Transportation & Infrastructure
SV Youth Voices
Utility Facilities in ROW
2018 Budget Amendment
Draft Advance Agenda 2/15/2018 1:39:00 PM Page 2 of 2